Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 7 TRACT B GOLDEN PEAK BASE 1993 LEGALftiT HlAi7 -A^/ W6 cdasrs MrA fu ffiss1,ef€ FTI PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSIOf 'L E f;OP Y September 13, 1993 MINUTES MEMBERS ABSENT 1. A reouest to amend the G.trfgrl Peak 8f{ t}ara development plan and a reguest for a landscape variance for Tract F, Vail village Sth Filing/458 Vail Valley Drive. MEMBERS PRESENT Greg Amsden Bill Anderson Jeff Bowen Diana Donovan Kalhy Langenwalter Allison Lassoe Dalton Williams Applicant: Planner: STAFF PRESENT Kristan Pritz Mike Mollica Andy Knudtsen Shelly Mello Vail Associates, Inc. Andy Knudtsen Andy Knudtsen made a presentation per the staff memo. He stated that VA was proposing this design foi one year and that they would be presenting a permanent parking s-olution neit year. He said that the parking plan required a variance because inere *as no perimeter landscaping. Andy stated that this proposal would increase the net parking toi tnis area by thirty-seven spaces' He said the proposal would also require an amendment to ihe CbtOen Peak Development Plan. He stated that staff was recommending approval of this request with three conditions' Tom Allender of Vail Associates, lnc., stated that the Town of Vail and Vail Associates were trying to jointly address problem areas within the Town and that this project was an exampie of this iype of effort. He stated that he would like to hear comments from the neighbors of the Golden Peak Ski Base area. Greg Amsden asked staff how they would insure that Vail Associates would resurface the tennis courts by June 1, 1994. Kristan Pritz stated that if Vail Associates did not comply with the June 1, 1994 deadline, that the Town could issue citalions until the work was completed in a worst case scenario. She emphasized that Vail Associates understood the responsibility to repave and that they were willing to post a letter of credit. Diana Donovan wanted to know if the Town had any documents showing the relationship of Vail Valley Drive, Mill Creek Circle, All Seasons Condominiums and the Golden Beak Ski Base. She asked the applicant why the fire turnaround needed to be widened. Planning and Envlronm€ntal commlssion September 13, 1993 Tom Allender responded that the fire trucks needed to be able to reach all parts of the Golden Peak Ski Base area within 150 feet of a truck staging area. Kristan Pritz provided an aerial photo to answer Diana's questions about the vicinity. Jim Lamont stated that Monica Benderly, President ol the Manor Vail Condominium Association and Sara Newsam, Acting General Manager of the Manor Vail Condominiums were present for this hearing. He stated that VA and the Town should pursue incentives/disincentives that would discourage people to park at.the Golden ireak Ski Base area on high volume days. He stated that the issue of the bus-stop should be studied closely this ski season. Jim said that he would like to see the Town of Vail better manage the traffic situation in this area. He said that he felt that the Town of Vail should address day{o-day traffic problems. He stated that adiacent property owners are concerned with the effects that this proposal will have on traffic congesiion and ingress-egress lor this area. He stated that the existing situation is not worling well. He itateO tnat adiacent property owners are most concerned with increajing.the traffic at the Gold-en Peak Ski Base area. He stated that increasing parking in this area would be contradictory to the underlying zoning for the area and the development plan. Monica Benderly stated that the she was concerned with the additional parking from a safety point of view and in particular, the safety of the children. She stated that they were'in favor of seeing a change in the existlng situation but that they did not feel this current request was the best solution. Diane Milligan, representing the Ramshorn Condominium Association, stated that they were concerned about lhe current traffic congestion. She stated that parking belongs in a parking structure. She stated that this proposal currently before the PEC would not elimina'le the existing traflic problems and may further increase traffic congestion in this area. Dave Schreiner, Manager of the All Seasons Condominiums, stated that increasing the parking in this area would only add to the existing traffic problems in the area. He stated that there are safety concerns for this area already' Bill Anderson stated that he supported a solution to the bus turnaround at this location. He stated that he was against parking on the tennis courts. He stated that the tennis courts are on land that is currently used for recrealional purposes and that parking on this property would be a change in use lhat may not be consistent with the area. He stated that he felt addilional tfrought needed to be given to find a solution for this site. Diana Donovan stated that she felt there were problems with this proposal. She stated that she felt that the proposed bus exit point had too many conllicts with existing drop- off points. She stated that the loss of landscaping was a concern' She added that the substantial increase in traffic lo an already congested area was a concern. Plannlng and Envlronmental commlssion September 13, 1993 2 Greg Amsden stated that he felt that the addition of parking at the Golden Peak Ski Base area will increase traffic on Blue Cow Chute. He stated that this proposal seemed piece meal and that it was not a good solution to the existing traffic congestion problems at this location. He stated that the landscaping was a concern' He iaid thai tne south side of this site needed to be lighted and needed a gutter and curb. Jeff Bowen stated that he felt that additional studies need to be conducted regarding what the alternative solutions for this location are. He stated that snowplowing the tennis courts all winter could damage the tennis court surfaces to a greater degree than what Vail Associates may be ftanning on repairing. Jeff said that he agreed with the idea of reversing the direition of the bus routes. He said that if the tennis courts are used for parking, he would like to see the deadline for resurfacing the tennis courts moved forwaiO to May of 1994 so that they may be used during the spring season. He said that he would like to see Vail Associates produce a master plan for future projects. Allison Lassoe stated that she was abstaining from this item. Dalton Williams stated that changing the bus route may help the traffic congestion problems in the area. He stated that he was not in favor of using the tennis courts as a parking area. He said that the parking that is now used (the first row of parking aring v;it Valley Drive) should be removed and landscaping be installed and the sideialk at thisiocation to be widened. He stated that he felt that the solution Vail Associates proposed has not been designed thoroughly. Kathy Langenwalter stated that the proposed exit for the parking is too close to the bus turnaround and should be moved. She stated that she likes the idea of a sidewalk being placed along Vail Valley Drive. She said that she was not in favor of adding parking in this area. Mike Rose stated that if the flow of the bus traflic is reversed, that people would have to be dropped in the parking lot which would not enhance safety in this area. He said that the separation of tne Ouses from olher traffic was positive. He stated that he feels comfortable with the parking exit which Vail Associates was proposing' Chris Ryman of Vail Associates stated that the intent of this proposal is to address the safety and tralfic issues in this area. He stated that they realized that parking on the tennii courts would be a sensitive issue. He stated that Vail Associates' intent is to make this area better. He stated that they are not trying to increase traffic in this area but rather, to manage the traffic flow. He stated that this plan may not be the right solution but that it was a first attempt to address the issues. He stated that Vail Associates would like to further research the issue to see what modifications could be made keeping in mind the feedback they have heard today. Planning and Environmental Commission September 13, 1993 2. Tom Sheely of the Vail Police Department stated thal the Police Department receives more compaints about this area than any other part of town and that some sort of solution needs to be created to manage ihe situation. He stated that enforcement was not the solution. Kathy Langenwalter asked Tom what his comments were concerning the workability of the currently ProPosed Project. He stated that it seems like it could work lor this location but that it may not be sensitive enough to lhe surrounding neighborhoods' Joe Macy stated that Vail Associates appreciated all of the input from the PEC as well as tne public and that they would like to come back in two weeks with a proposal that more adequately addresses the concerns that have been raised' Jim Lamont stated that he would like to see the Town ot Vail pursue some long-range studies addressing the traffic patterns in this area to see the traflic problems in this area addressed. Diana Donovan stated that she would like to be involved in the discussions that take place before this item comes back belore the PEC as a citizen and resident of this area. She stated that she would like to see the buses give people the best drop-off at this location in order to encourage the use of the bus system' Bill Anderson, Greg Amsden and Jefl Bowen stated that they had no further comments. Dalton Williams inquired about the trash dumpster and whether Vail Associates plan to clean up this area. Chris Ryman stated that this trash dumpster would be addressed' Jeff Bowen made a motion to withdraw the request as it relates to the parking and to table the bus stop realignment request until September 27 ' 1993. Dalton Williams seconded this motion anO a e-O-t vote tabled this item to September 27, 1993 with Allison Lassoe abstaining. A request for a minor subdivision, a request lor variances for wall heights, construction in an area with slopes in excess ol 4c,h and parking in the front setlac! and an amendment to the approved development plan for the for the Briar Patch development located at 1398 Buffehr creek RoadiLot F, Lionsridge subdivision Filing No. 2. Applicant: Planner: Briar Patch Condominiums Shelly Mello Planning and Envlronmental Commlsslon sept€mber 13, 1993 Apun ') , , F ,'L*,<avrf . q /-.-dt,.- r3# )nro S, L.= ' &4 5<- <r rr' __2b _&tj '..-rr- d- L- " ( t,- "/^4 15,._.o .-f a, o f^r s ' LnlJ H, ,w datr Jl h-, {ln +-rca.-<- (r-(, fu/,- a.r.\.r-d <-Lw {r*t o o"-*- I nuF . | / / t z- / //t ' --t ft."L g fu l; <A d--a (r' fd{. .i'u''+(z ln o At//41I \ loa r* : ,.. t." h 11 la-r ,u ,, /',* ,l .u re-ra t -s , I ' '/ / "t L /,t//ttl/taw- ./t.-f 6-'1. /n*-. g-lo"u-( ,l 4- o , / 4 llt i ' ' t ? | ,/t Df *-* rrr'rr. J -r? \|v/Aru 2*<-' lt /fo+ b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. VII. STAFFRECOMMENDATION Statf recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Gold Peak development plan as it meets the criteria and the parking lot landscaping variance with three conditions. 1. This approval is valid for one year only. Prior to June 1, 1994 Vail Associates is to remove all temporary improvements and return the site to the condition that it is in today. The Town of Vail recommends that Vail Associates evaluate the success of these changes in the latter part of this ski season and submit plans for a permanent alignment no later than June 1, 1994. The bus stop may continue to be used during the summer months at the Gold Peak Base Area buildings as long as the new permanent proposal is received by June 1, 1994. 2. Vail Associates is to record a fire lane at the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's Office which meets the standards of the Vail Fire Department prior to utilizing the tennis courts for parking. Vail Associates is responsible for posting no parking signs along the fire lane after the site modilications are made. 3. Vail Associates is responsible for resurfacing the tennis courts to a standard acceptable to the Vail Recreation District no later than June 1, 1994 or as otherwise agreed by the VRD. 4. Vail Associales shall add two planters on either side of the parking lot entrance lo match the planters to be installed on either side of the bus stop drop-off. Staff is recommending this approval based on the criteria discussed above as well as the findings. Specifically, staff believes that finding B1 is met in that the proposal does not constitute a grant of special privilege and that linding 82 is met in that the proposal will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare. Finding 83 is met in that there are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances applicable to the site in that it was cited in the Vail Transportation Master Plan and that the proposal is improving the safety of the area' Please note that under Section 18.62.080 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, the approval of a variance shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and construction not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion within two years from when the approval becomes final. cpec\memosVagoldpk.9l 3 B. Staff believes that for this trial basis, the relationship of this proposed use to the surrounding areas will be acceptable. Though larger, lhe parking lot will be operated much the same as it has been in the past. lf, in the future, Vail Associates decides to make the improvemenls permanent, staff will require V.A. lo substantially screen the proposed uses and meet the landscape standards of the zoning code. lt will be particularly important to buffer this use from the residences on Mill Creek Circle and Vail Valley Drive. Staff received three letters lrom neighbors and they are attached to the end of this memo. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretatlon and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibitity and unilormity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the oblectives ot thls title without grant of special privilege. Staff believes that there is not a grant of special privilege with this request since it is limited in the duration it will be in effect. Given that Vail Associates will need to provide permanent solutions in the future that meet the landscaping standards, staff believes that it is reasonable to allow them to proceed on a one year basis without meeting the standards. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportatlon and traffic facilities, public tacilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff believes that there will be a positive impact on transportation and traffic facilities if this project is approved. As discussed above, the delineation of three different turnaround areas for three different purposes will enhance the efficiency and safety of all three different types of uses. The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followino findinos before orantino a variance: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical ditficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. G. H. One of the changes that will occur as a result of this project is that the pedestrian area between the bus stop and the stairs going up to the lifts will be regraded. By putting in curb stop on the edge of this pedestrian area and leveling it out with asphalt, Vail Associates plans to make this a much safer area to walk through. The parking lot layout provides pedestrian walk ways within the project which align with sidewalks across Vail Valley Drive at Manor Vail and All Seasons. Building type in terms of appropriateness to density, site relationship and bulk. This proposal does not impact the criteria referenced above as there are no buildings in the proposal. Landscaping of the total site in terms of: purposes, types, maintenancet suitability, and affect on lhe neighborhood. Staff has worked with the Vail Associates representative, Tom Allender, regarding the amount of landscaping that should be provided. On the perimeter of the site at the entrances and exits into the parking area and bus turnaround, staff has requested that Vail Associates provide timber planters with spruce trees. During the review of this project, staff and Vail Associates agreed to use jersey barrier only on the interior of the site. Both the Town crews and Vail Associates crews which will operate snow plows have requested that jersey barrier be used as it will stand up to plowing during the winter. However, it is intended that it not be seen from outside the parking lot. In general, staff believes that the landscaping is adequate for a one year trial basis. It IV. ) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Staff believes that the project has many positive aspects; however, one negalive side to the project is the increase in automobile trips through Blue Cow Chute. Staff believes that keeping the cars on the Fronlage Road and in the Lionshead and Village Parking Structures is much better than bringing them into core areas. The approximately thirty-seven additional spaces are not enough, in statf's opinion, to outweigh the benefits ol the new alignments for the bus stop. Staff understands that Vail Associates cannot alford to lose the parking spaces that will be removed due to the new bus stop alignment without providing the additional parking on the tennis courts. In summary, staff believes that the additional trips are a negative aspect but that they do not outweigh the benefits of the revised drop-off and bus stop alignments. V. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060 of the Vail Municipal Code, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the requested variance based on the following factors: A. Consideration of Factors: 1. The relatlonshlp of the requested variance to other existing or polentlal uses and structures in the vicinity. C. Functional open space in terms of: optimum preservation of naturalfeatures (including trees and drainage areas), recreation, views, convenience, and function. Of the criteria listed above, staff believes that recreation is one that should be considered in this proposal. Staff believes that the tennis courls are a recreational amenity and need to be available for use no later than June 1, 1994 or as agreed to by the VRD, assuming the courts will be available for summer use. A condition of approval regarding the resurfacing is listed at the end of this memo requiring it to be completed by this date. Staff would like to emphasize that the tennis courts, as a recreational amenity, should be considered in the long-term design solution for this area. lf a permanent proposal is to be made by Vail Associates next year, staff would like to undersland from the vRD what the importance of these courts are in their program. Resurfaclng these courts each spring for summertime use is an option that should be considered. Maintaining these courts as an amenity for this area is a point that staff wants to emphasize and would like to see discussed in detail if this plan becomes a permanent solution. D. The variety in terms of housing type, densilies, facilities, and open space. Statf believes that the applicant's request will not impact the criteria listed above. E. Privacy in terms ot the needs of: individuals, families, and neighbors. Stafl believes that if this solution is determined lo be effective, that longlerm solutions will need to be provided lo insure the privacy of residents along Mill Creek Circle and the developments across Vail Valley Drive. For the trial year, staff believes that additional screening to address this requirement is not necessary. F. Pedestrian traffic in terms of safety, separation, convenience, access to points of destinatlon and attractiveness. Statf believes that the pedestrian safety, convenience and separation from other modes of transportation will improve as a result of this proposal. As discussed in an earlier criterion, separating out the different uses should improve the pedestrian access. A.The developer witl provide a buffer zone in areas where the Skl Base\Recreation District boundary is adlacent to a residential use district boundary. The butfer zone must be kept free of buildings or structures, and must be landscaped' screened to protect it by naturat features so that adverse effects on the surrounding areas are minimized. This may require a buffer zone of sufficient size to adequately separate the proposed use from the surrounding properties in terms of visual privacy, noise, adequate light, air, air pollution, signage' and other comparable potentially incompatible factors. The proposal will abut residential zone districts by Mill Creek Circle as well as the residential developments across Vail Valley Drive such as Manor Vail, Ramshorn and All Seasons. Staff believes that if this plan is successful in alleviating congeslion, and Vail Associates proposes a permanent solution, that the parking lot/tennis courts adjacent to the residences on Mill Creek Circle should be heavily screened. ln the interim, for this first year, staff believes that the existing siluation will be acceptable. The two planters adjacent to the bus turnaround will improve the appearance of the area. Each will contain three spruces. Similarly, the landscape buffer between this area and the developmenls across Vail Valley Drive will need to be improved, if the design becomes permanent' The Code calls for a 15 foot wide landscape barrier around parking lots such as these. In the future, the Town believes that it would be imperative to create this buffer of landscaping around the parking lot. For the lirst year, which is a trial year, staff believes that it is reasonable to allow Vail Associates to continue to operate the parking area as it has in the past. The clrculation system designed for the type of traffic generated' taking into consideration, safety, separation from living area, convenience, access' noise' and exhaust controls. Private internal streets may be permitted if they can be used by potice and fire department vehicles for emergency purposes. Bicycle traltic shall be considered and provlded when the site ls to be used for residential purposes. The purpose ol this proposal is to improve the safety and reduce the congestion of the circulation system in the Gold Peak Base Area. With lhe additional turnaround area, Town stafl believes that the shuttle bus will be able to move much more etficiently through this bus stop. One of the problems in this area, according to Vail Associates, is that parents using the drop-off area for ski school daycare take longer than the five minutes allowed for parking in the drop-off. Creating a turnaround area specifically for parents will allow more time and will improve the safety for the children. This will in turn free up a third turnaround area specifically for day skier drop-off. Town slatf believes that the proposal will improve the current situation for this area. Staff would like to reemphasize that this problem has been identified in the Master Transportation Plan and this proposalconforms to the diagram in the plan. The Fire Department has requested that Vail Associates provide a fire lane easement which is to be defined and recorded prior to any sile work. The fire lane will also need to be posted with signs so that it can be enforced this winter. Currently, this waiting o@urs in Vail Valley Drive. In previous ski seasons, Vail Associates has parked approximately one hundred and forty{ive cars in this lot. The proposed plan, based on 9 foot wide spaces, will increase the capacity to one hundred eighty-two spaces. The proposal results in an additionalthirty-seven spaces. A variance to the parking lot landscaping slandards of the zoning code is required because the parking area would be expanded but the landscaping requirement for parking lots would not be met. Section 18.52.080 states that: "not less than 10% of the interior surface area of unenclosed off- street parking areas containing fifteen or more parking spaces shall be devoted to landscaping. In addition, landscape borders not less than 10 feet in depth shall be provided at all edges of parking lots containing more lhan 15 parking spaces. Landscape borders not less than 15 feet in depth shallbe provided at all edges of parking lots containing more than thirty parking spaces. A landscape berm, wall, or fence not less than 4 feet in height of the same architectural style as the building may be subslituted for the landscape border, subject to the Design Review Board approval." Of the two standards for landscaping in parking lots, this proposal meets the requirement for interior landscaping. The existing planters next to the tennis courts provide 10.2% landscaped area, which exceeds the code requirement of 10%. The requirement for perimeter landscaping, which should be 15 leet in depth, is not met with this proposal. The Vail Recreation District (VRD) reviewed this proposal in their meeting on September 8, 1993. They tabled the discussion. Board members expressed concerns about impacts to neighbors and wanted to know if the neighbors would attend the PEC hearing and discuss the project. The other concern involved the affect this proposal would have on the status of their lease. The VRD has a ninety-nine year lease from Vail Associates for the tennis courts. Staff believes that it is imperative that the tennis courts be resurfaced prior to June 1, 1994. III. DESIGNSTANDARDS/CRITERIAFOREVALUATION The development plan for the Ski Base/Recreation Zone District shall meet each of the following standards, or demonstrate that either one or more is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved: The lurnaround area is designed so that the buses will drop off passengers in front of lhe Gold Peak Base buildings. A new ramp located on the east side of the buiHings will be installed which meets ADA access requirements. On the north side of the bus stop will be a parking lot for Vail Associates supervisors. There will be twenty-one spaces in this area. The supervisor parking area will be lined with jersey barriers on the west and south sides. This will facilitate snow plowing as plow drivers will be able to identify the edge of the parking lot. The other sides of the bus drop-off area and parking lot will be identified with curb stops and bollards connected by rope. Though not as efficient as jersey barriers, this delineation will occur at the edges of the lot which are more visible to the public. Staff was concerned with the amount of jersey barrier that will be used with this proposal and believes that pulling it away from the perimeter is a reasonable compromise with Vail Associates. There will be two new landscaping areas as part of this project. The planters will be constructed out of timbers and will contain three spruce trees each. They will be located on either side of the bus entrance to the turnaround area. Staff believes that if this proposal is approved, that all of the temporary improvements should be removed from the site no later than June 1, 1994. This would include the curb slops, the jersey barriers, the timber planters and any other temporary improvement. The Town believes that these types of improvements would detract from the appearance of this area during the summer months. Another important factor in the consideration of this proposal is the Vail Transportation Master Plan. This Master Plan was adopted in January of 1993. On Page V, under the short-term recommendations for the in-town shuttle, it states that the third priority is to "relocate the turn-around at Gold Peak to separate auto/bus conflicts." On Page 53, it says "in addition, new turnaround areas should be provided at the Gold Peak Area as shown in Figure 12." This diagram is attached at the end of this memo. The proposed plan is consistent with the diagram shown in the Transportation Master Plan. As stated earlier, the proposed reconfigurations would be approved for the 1993-1994 ski season only. The approval would expire one year from the date of approval. lf the new alignment is successful in facililating the in-town shuttle and improving the children's ski school drop-off area, Vail Associates will proceed with a permanent solution. B. Parkino Plan A second major component of this proposal is to enlarge the parking area. This would be done by allowing people to park on the existing tennis courts during the winter and resurfacing them next spring. Portions of the fence around the tennis court would be removed. The fencing along the norlh and south sides would remain during the winter. A portion of the existing planter on the north side of the courts would be removed to allow for an entry but a majority of the planter area would remain. The entrance into this parking area would be significantly changed from the way it currenlly operates. The entrance and exit lo the lot would be shifted to the west end of the parking area. In addition, there would be a 70 foot driveway from Vail Valley Drive into the parking lot. This would allow approximately three to four cars to wait in line to get into the lot. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: o, ,l Ev-*-l i"'\ MEMORANDUM Planning and Environmental Commission Community Development Department September 13, 1993 A request to amend the development plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base Area to allow for a realignment of the bus stop drop-off and an expansion of the parking area located on Tract F, Vail Village Sth Filing/458 Vail Valley Drive. Applicant: Planner: Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Tom Allender Andy Knudtsen I. INTRODUCTION Vail Associates is requesting to realign the inlown shuttle bus drop-off and expand the parking area at the Gold Peak Base Area onto the existing tennis courts. This proposal 7 involves two requests regarding the Zoning Code. The lirst is an amendment to the Gold Peak Development Plan and the second is a variance from the Zoning Code standards for parking lot design. The request is limited to a one year duration, and lhe approval will expire one year from lhe date of this hearing, if approved. Vail Associates will be using temporary l materials for this trial period. lf the realignment of the bus stop is successful, Viit nssociates 'w will return and propose permanent improvements (landscaping, paving and curbs, lighting, etc.) On December 7, 1983, Ordinance No.45, Series of 1983 imposed the Ski Base\Recreation Zone District on this site. Vail Associates, Inc., has submitted an application to amend the Development Plan. The criteria that were adopted by this Ordinance will be addressed below, in addition to the variance criteria. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUEST A. ln-town Shuttle The first part of this request involves a realignment of the in-town shuttle bus drop-off. Vail Associates and the Town of Vail have identified the need for a clear delineation of turnaround areas at the Gold Peak Ski Base Area. Currently, there are two turnaround areas: one for the shuttle bus and the other for day skier drop-off/children's ski school drop-off. The proposed bus turnaround would be located to the northwest of the current turnarounds. With the new alignment, the existing turnarounds would be used seoaratelv for day skier drop-off and children's ski school drop-off. $ i 'i t.i: .. :," :'}.l-\ :" t!. 1r: Best copy Available Bs- Crzrrt.rf \ \ct \€l(/.', I ral: 5l! {l(oq G I'I ll{: it YI 1l '1 i XIt Ei { ii z{ G' 'tl .,../ ,':'l \'j: 'iri',':!ii'rn. E;T =rrlz ri , .. ,,i\"".:..;,ir. -t'.3 l.i i' r'' ,'. t .. .t t ;]il*# ,.t: Va Tnnsoortation Mastr Plan Chapter lV ft'Bus Loading A rea No Stalrs Raquired Pedestrian Area Pedestrlan \lalkway I I IF Legend E Sf LandscapedAreas * Bus lral{ic FIow -> General Traffic Flow I * I ' Figure 12 Golden Peak Area Short Term Concept N\\\TiNNN.N Tenais Courts ll^ i$$ Golden Peak Ski Basa Golden Peek Children's Ski Town ol Vail Page 54 'i'Y-'d T1lljFRANK H. WYMAN A75 P EII AV€NUE NEw YoFX. N' Y. IOO22 l:l lr?5t 4!58 Town of Vail Plannirrg & Ertviroruucntal Commission 75 South Fronnge Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Att: i{r. Kristan Pritz September 9, 1993 Gentlemen: Re Vail Associates Colden Peak hoposal Bus Stop- fennis Court/Palking [-ot I am a homeowner tn Vail and liye at the All Seasoru Condominiums Apartruetrt 8-6, which is across the srreer from the Golden Peak Ski area, Iam also President of ttre All Seasons Condominium Association and Iam wridng this lctter on behalf of the Board of Govcrnon of the Condominiurn Association. tlhas Jusr come to our ar@ntion thal yuur Cournrission will bc askcd by-Vail Associaros. to appto*i" the use of the tcnnis courB to rhc north of rhe Golden Peak Ski arca as a puking lot during the Winrer months.. We would like ro sb'ongly objcct to this plan and urge your Commission to void it. Itis surely the worst kind of planning ro establish a large parting area in rhe view shed of some oi the mosl exper,sive real estate in Vail. In addition, ic closa proxlmiry ro rhis rcal estatc wilt rlean drat thc noisc and gasolinc fumcr will advcreely affect the quality of life of all residents in the area. Funhermore., the propcrserl parking facility will conrribute to unmanageable rraffic.iami ard wilt result in unacceptable hazards to pcdestrians and skicrs in the area. Forward looking communities, such as Beaver Creek organize iheir parking facilities atsome distance from residenrial areas and transpon skiers to the slopes by shunle buses. The Town of Vail shrrrld not go hackwards in town ptanning and permit residential areas of the town to be soiled and choked by auomobile ',raffic. Surely the interests of the homeownerg of rlre Town of Vait who havo lived thcrc sinoo Vail's inception should be considered aheid of those of day trippers who come to Vail to ski but who are tlo luy !o walk a few blocks fmm outlying parking areas. Sincerely yours, ?Y4kh,1,'', Frank H. w{1"" :rL " lu 'J!, ltJllii ,rfufo WEafVait .September f q 1993 The Town of VaiI Plaffting and Environmental Crrmmis<ion Attu: ltistan Pritz 75 South Prontage Road, Wesr VaII, CO 8i652 Monica Bcndedn Prcsidcnt Eoard of Manrgen; o dv^rL Lb!65T)rivc- Vaif. Cofsraf,o et6r/ I t{rJn tiHilul{ uh I L Ltrlr0l-nAoc . sa I (J.6)) 476-tbrt trax (,o)r 17s-19g2 7"1 ,,r, R-E; Vail Associates, Inc.fl'own of Vafl Golden PeaL Bus Stop Relocation and Tennis Court Parking proposal on behalf of the Manor vat! coadonlniurn Assgaarion rve hereby protert the vail Asociates, lnc./t'a'w'n of Vail- proposal regardiqg tire relocation of thl 6r:s ,top and thupro-pos4 parkirU on the teonis courts. \Ye wirh to raise coDcerns regarding put Uc s"f"ty and traffic flow with regard to tle proposed location end design of ihe bt "'.top. Furthcr, we are concenred widr thc cuoversion clfrecreationel open space ro parking, based on -potendal trafic flow and ptblic safety conflicts that rvould resUt fon iafreast1g parHng at Golden Peak. YIe believe that this is an inappropriate and incompatible use di public recreational open space- \{'c do nocbclictc C:atrt= hay-e b-e.o sufi.i.,ltlf infonlterl as (u 1f,s dgr},ilq of this proposal and, fterefore, we bave aor had dme to inform our Board as to the consequeicd and implications of rhis proposal. Sincerely, T\4ANO R VAIL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATiO N4 Acting Gcncral M'natrr cc: Board of Managers Tcm Coostaatine '1. 'F TOTRL- |reCC.Oal r(4( r",ful ," Rfl: Vail Assr:ciat.esl ttr+n of Vai! Gal'Jerr Feak buE st'op relocation & tenni.s c'rurt parlr ing prrrpr,sel . Ag alr a,J.iacerrL Frr.rf,F-'erty 'f({l1ef I wlsh to prot,est" tlre proposal tn Iocate psrlt 1n1:; ,rn t.lre 6,r l,,J Peak tetrtri gr c€'ul't!i. I br:leave it to L'e irrc'ltrtPatable UEr?rf,frecre$l'i,]il;1!r;rpehEpace.Furtfrerrit'willirlcrLiaset'resspaec'ingtri, tfre pul,l:c olr nry 6.ri.r'gr.:"iy. Further, by p-,rnvideirrg ad'-'liti'rnal pankirrg iL r*,ill crrrtjeEt traffic arrct itrcreaEe ha=ands t'r pe'Jestfians in t'he neirJhh|-f rt-rDn{l . Trrwrr Of Veri I Planning tr Envi r'':'ntrle rl t.a I ALtrr: l{ris!tsrn 15ri.tn 7$ S'r Frontage ftd. Uest'Vail Co gl6[i7 I I.a (i I etrtg:nt eurflet. :.'S5 l'{i I1 Cnet:k Ci rc le StSIt StP r 1 \99I Tr)wn Uf Veri I Flann j. 11,1 3t Et"lvi l" ':,nrrierr ta .1. C':'nt At.tn I l'::l. i$tifrr"t Pri.t.;: 7.5 .i;':, l- rrrtrt.arf* R'l . lJe=t (,1::i I / ,-, :::1t--.q.-7 RH: (,rai 1 Ags'trc iat.ss,/ t.,:'sn ':f V;:iri I 6,:Ldsn F*s[,: t,Us st.,f,F, t'e1':'rst i'f,I-l |1 + i:r'lr1 i q r,-'r tra+ r,:r.L'i rr,r r, r.,_,r,.-,e = I Ag atr sil.iacent. pr"rrFEl. ty ,:rr,+t-ts t' I wish t ':, pr':t.*:;t t.he pr'':p'*sal t{' 1*rate psr[,: itrg ,: t-l the G,:1d Feg!,: tsntri.r; c':,ul*t.s . I hs l*:r'.,,* i t. t.,: L'e i rr c,:ttipa t aL, .L e uc-e ':'f recreat i*n:tl 'rpen EFace. Fr,rrtfrel. . it. wi 11 incre$se t reespa=sitrg L,y tl-re p'uL,i ic '::,i1 rriy pr':;:ert.i.r. f:urt.Frer, ['y p'r':vi':l* j.l-lg :irldi tir:naI parl"': ing it,*il1 c':'njest. tr*ef f ic eir'l incr,::asel haeerrds t* p*dest.r'iatrl; itr the 11* i gl-lh',f t. h':"f 'l . Dr*tl1e t' ::,55 l,li11 Cree[,: Cj.rcle C 1 errr*n t /l4Axr,,tr.-, Pa<xruo Oa.r€ uJ,tY T<AFFt< Vgv Lt..zrq -Go- Szo<aqe -<k-* 4 |"= zo' P4qpt,;tG SF4<€J TA|FF|< Fcowt PostrBt€ p/9<)<tNc SpA<eS Row. -----/ --- __ _--.--. *- \ \ I t I I Ir I 1 I I Nh rl l, I I I I I l I I |t ? N{ l.l 6 INNl"* l"' i\ / / C<:tsg-t I 1o+'AT 7 t ll V4ucr 4 r qz6"- #/ /' t -'/ '/ / -\- --{---/ /--/ r ll - -.-r\it6u €p6e oF pAVeTnO{T P4eKtxt6 S ,o,f €e S -------+ lR+rrtc- Fcoi.nt z7zz7 No oBsTR<t<7/o^/ ,4 ed 5 \-\__=-___.-.-..- --- __\-- '\,-r.__s ___ i l'AQ*tcec ! Z)n,€ ru,9V 4oeoua-€ P4ar<tu c 'Tr?AsFt c J^o,",, Sroaece 6:f__s._* t-< ty: -.--_--_--.-O,i-\ r3 ir il) ulo ..\i\.--- V^,, Vnrrn Dc,,o- @ l2qntmurn Prle*,-e, {Z-t^:av T<a ret < IZt,nt---=lt S^o*, S:ro*+Cri I NI I ) 6."."" a ^.-- -ti-KN- 53yf -..--*-- l^ = zo/ N€u ccr''f oF Plv€r'€^tT P4R.KING sP,tc€5 ;} RAFn< Fzot -t e-- PosstELE PApr,i,,6 !Pr*c€5 o \\ \ \ ---i--.r-..i.i--r-- \\\----/ :.: I C<rv*-T I C-ovAT ? Vn,, Vnrro -----*_\_.*\--\.\___ @ - - N€xt VzV No /n =zot €pe€ or Pavelll,at 8gs-er>cT/oN AeCfl No Pne*r,.,c { €.'rtezoextel 4c.ess O^'.7 I fiOeq,:nre Suo.^., SfoeAe€ | N I I ,) 6oa! a ^\ -- '-'e€1 .-< tU€___ \ N Iil tfl til iil iI rl 1l: It tj r$ \. \ \ . .t\ i J ,'l \'l \ ^..1 ,'J :'l )l i'l Ir,, il!,ot \\ \ \ \\ I 1 I I I I I I t) / \ /./ -\---a/--z- ^---.r\1)o,, ,"- .- \*----==.--___.-==--__ | ll Vn,, Vnrrn-__ /"=zo' --t,=_r-\\-_ K - t-< lLrf -, * N€!.J €oCG 6p ptEv*rt€NT 2o' ,( c.<€ss €4 S€4NT 4 TRAFF\: Fcot^) /tttt Ap(t. Zo G{ ,jd/*oa,r,d-, .-__=rr-.-__...- \ \\ )\ \\ \ \ \ I t I I I ,L'-J \l -/t\. \- -tr_ -- / _.__. _ ,_ _ \, -_r -- -_ - -_-______.___ ______ V,+,, Vn rr*Q4 t ve- ,lfirrl-oa\hlr S0.lSep i J',:iJ 5eF tusrVai(Vatbg Drive- Vait. Co[orado gt6r| (oo)) 176-%rl Fax (30]) 476- 4992 September 10, 1993 The Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission Attn: Kristan Pritz 75 South Frontage Road, West Vail, CO 81657 RE: Vaii Associates, Inc.Aown of Vail Golden Peak Bus Stop Relocation and Tennis Court Parking Proposal On behalf of the Manor Vail Condominium Association we hereby protest the Vail Associates, Inc./Town of Vail proposal regarding the relocation of the bus stop and the proposed parking on the tennis courts. We wish to raise concerns regarding public safety and traffic flow with regard to the proposed location and design of the bus stop. Further, we are concerned with the conversion ofrecreational open space to parking, based on potential traffic flow and public safety conflicts that wouid result from increasing parking at Golden Peak. We believe that this is an inappropriate and incompatible use of public recreational open space. We do not believe that we have been sufficiendy informed as to the details of this proposal and, therefore, we have not had time to inform our Board as to the consequences and implications of this proposal. Sincerely, MANOR VAIL CONDOMINII.IM ASSOCIATION Acting General Manager cc: Board of Managers Tom Constantine Monica Benderly, President Otc'DStP 151t"'' Cnenr,rs A. Mnvnn 135 SOUTH LASALLE STREET cHtcAco, rLLlNols 60603 3r2/ 5,AO-a623 Sepember 9,1993 Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 Attention: Kristan Fritz RE: Vail Associates proposal to relocate Golden Peak Bus stop and convert tennis courts to parking Dear Sir,&ladam: As adjacent property owners, we raise objections to the conversion of recreational open space, cunently being used as tennis courts, to surface parking. We further object to the implication of increased traffic and congestion resulting from the parking lot. We have been provided with insufficient evidence to make any further objections with regards to the merits of this proposal. We ask that the matter be tabled or rejected until further information is available to us. Sincerely yours, Lt*a-" ft1'.".,.,r- I l- l'f f La't Gc.r'- c'av ./^-, , \CAlWsc " / FRANK H. WYMAN 375 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK. N. Y. 1OO22 (212) 7s9.6355 Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Att: Mr. Kristsn Pritz Gentlemen: September 9,1993 Re Vail Associates Golden Peak Proposal Bus Stop. Tennis Court/Parking Lot I am a homeowner in Vail and live at the All Seasons Condominiums Apartment 8-6, which is across the street from the Golden Peak Ski area. I am also President of the All Seasons Condominium Association and I am writing this letter on behalf of the Board of Governors of the Condominium Association. It has just come to our attention that your Commission will be asked by Vail Associates to approve the use of the tennis courts to the north of the Golden Peak Ski area as a parking lotduring the Winter months.. We would like to strongly object to this plan and urge your Commission to void it, It is surely the worst kind of planning to establish a large parking area in the view shed of some of the most expensive real estate in Vail. In addition, its close proximity to this real estate will mean that the noise and gasoline fumes will adversely affect the quality of life of all residents in the area. Furthermore, the proposed parking facility will contribute to unmanageable trafficjams and will result in unacceptable hazards to pedestrians and skiers in the area. Forward looking communities, such as Beaver Creek organize their parking facilities at some distance from residential areas and transport skiers to the slopes by shuttle buses. The Town of Vail should not go backwards in town planning and permit residential areas of the town to be soiled and choked by automobile traffic. Surely the interests of the homeowners of the Town of Vail who have lived there since Vail's inception should be considered ahead of those of day trippers who come to Vail to ski but who are too lazy to walk a few blocks from outlying parking areas. s Sincerely yours, // L-"'l / / 4 /,(* f,u"v - Frank H. W1;ilan z$<.." gq: 'ruz v3X 3n;rrz co) cr) CO o =F =E UJ.L Ln.ir \' ct .tr |. a UJ UJlr- tr =E uJ.L $+ K tb nffach nq $ Q.2tos #-tltt Ic I +a rl l-',J l?rlk roilo c"1r o\{)l l'i?l\' Ct\| 'lrl I,l- r, -13.,V d;i? s2r: q= rE g3 :lo lz lr= e= utl!F z(,z J € 4z Julo l! (r o E Fz o E. tEutz =o rl- ltr.rl F Itlz3 lr| F z $dfi ..i 6: cc> $ ts HH U2 z F-l -i- o c i;* :c E!Eit € qE 'g:&:IEiEii;Fc iEEiE E;Ee: x.;ge€ o:-o"(! P o-o f E ="gIY(a'voo Heg EB ieE e; E=o(,Eiei Ee:,$!= c -9?=oJ E ia;g gBiEE .i |-\l C\ co CO \' ro e{ c7) ca \f e{caN cr.l + !a c. e F UJ z l x =z J aFo J uJ 2 tr] = J z ll,,tu z tr uJ C)uJ 3g uJ z 6 uJo F6oc uJo o-fz luJ X F llJ U' (n uJult|- ==E uJ o- J F F (9z oJ :f CO (J ul ul z6 = o- ) 2 gJt NOtlVn'lVA c,.) uJl- o (t) lrq, Ji (,)o F{ !<E(ri.r =iZ Z tL lJP ^ 993q 5 5 etr E 3 o 8,.) tt> O GnZ '' C)FIo o 9?. ao z xol! <(oqio lU :i tY t-4: E :'i * N o- =>E ,-to CJ& I +.1 o .lJ Hd 0, +.1 ..irt lr (H o lr }{ a) FI r-l o.A .Fl J. b0 .''l +Jq .r{ X OJ z tr ,; = uJ F E t XX >< z Eoo z EE UJF =ujz ll I I t:zlzO <rtEu,K()o< =.ilPa6o<z Illtllt Lz 9-4IF "io3trOI z tr Jf z f) a zY O I I __l -l_l l 5 O t JI -l zl zl .. >l UJ ululz (nF CE uJ(L J z Eoo I i -"f -i >lUIol 1H c'l ca z lt, @ -T I I I zlat<l tl I ulFo @o? zo FIL uJY uJo oF F E u.l o- lto o-oo I ul Foz z ,NQz2coO>z O- LL ,^<5 =F== t!;dd= tr t!IL o Eo E<olo9 B9vcr 5:-FL* =uJ-EF=Q u,i a : >(I E 66 9 \utE XO_r x>o=Fo. "1er-E- LI' d) oF --- E =E,l!o-zIFq) fEFazoo klr,ru lltll!IItllltlttYI co |rll'lr'l Flt>l+f> HQ'l otz v=Jl! o t{ .Jo(,./. ItrloJ Itp.'.l l: I la,l€li V lurl>l<lzl/n L-a ! du.f =z t\ X UJ o = \t arl I I o- n d F C) = € (, o o.'{ FJ o ) o.n \C I \c i o- =C) +J +Ju 4 E l! I o a oz IJJ J u- z3v (.i .i I .i d) uJ I I I +'s r+ q, qliloJ=. #.Ht*JFCel>trl-lolzd3qo cr) .ir Iol-i Or ui IJJF r-{ao..1 d (.) 0, v =c z uJ -J l! z3 q E E Ec oz ul J l!oz3ots IJ,JJlllF = E z |lt J (L o z 3 F uj uJF t-Otu =() <F LJ.i <ZE r.Zo() <oOF ES ;iF =z^ih ,n*ZY =<f>(r d6 O ix:<F =?+E Y,Z =g E ir (JZ J<Oo?. :a nEiu ooeO rt)<f .--{ \ attrl ozI-6Jfo .! tlH''l $1fr-\.i J vi$ L ulo. =5 GoFo G 2oo o .cvr= .d (J(Jo.o6.2vl .n +J a6 +) a ts u,I!lo CrD 3 d oE o ttc6 ottooa5It @ E o =Ef o o CIoc 'o o qIoot Ootto(, ceg:.ttoJo ttCo .oc 'oF o! o CDg Poot)6 E: o: o Ic =o o Itc6 cl '6 d:9c6g =O, siE EEg €sE lis€5=c9o-aG d63 EE-e-ooiEos;eF5ii=s. $Ea €Ei !E€ E3; gEE 'E>O6=trP= E;E EEg -()6 aDu,u,t! E =GgJ o- Fo ]Jq- L 9- vlI -:z I q '-+) c, ;ao3ttozo Ec() u,o c. UJzqJo g o,!:1 -r?lr) Ettt3 =9 9 zzoog3: e;5i :g tn l- L v, (J .. >lo UJou,g,2o =E UJ J z 9 tsoo ul J IE aoul2Yo F !J 2 oz o,u,o Jc |E z Irl(\J F 4 F E \ \ 3 f'. ( F ,tsL\- o = ;v s ":T..J Er33 JJ a!o?zo 'F lllY uJ ID o ;Jl "'liu?3rj :uJt6 E-IorJJ CIf. F-r DD z,r9 =er00 =z dP oC)za 3b =uJ.oLU tr:GgJ G o uJoz l anIoFaI Jl-UJ i-h= dEIOO|!90Rurxc:> ul Jl! ll,ooF Eo F E Egt E E o E E Ea! / -r\&-t\| )-Ae \'<-4llE\.//lrb\/JJ=f\t l!=IL , E =EutA'zoF(Jf E, 6zoo Iz o IJJ = u- -c {J = o =lr I I J to "l E g q +J A J .g(u Eo oC' Iu =zo xo co 8 uJE J I c c+- (; UJ =z <f (f, Iol F- () s-q) L co L., L c., N {J 't- tAuutEd q J t I I I I ri, i'?vo._ u,(.E t rf,olz Hi $\ It\s\\ !lu CJz (t ut .EriIi1:d6EF I rl d 7ctt{'5 t3tl.lq dE ui l! oz d,u,E J l!ot2E}go|rJH = =g. E ct- ctIIG 2 s\ozt ll, u, e uJz '$. I o lrJF oc, E -rO<FEq)u., <zEIIJ Fe5 (t I e, o UJ uJ a 2 J( E )I gF 3E rdE -toz C'llJ = zl J I )) EoFb =+Go2 o c.) <oqEEl! ,'\>N-t.Ni \-\ ,,.1 dL ,i n > i;/,4< { t .ioo oo t I a 75 soulh lrontage road Yail, colorrdo E1657 (303) 479-2L38 or 479-,?\39 otllce of communlly devclopmcnl BUILDING PERl'iIT ISSUANCE TIME FMME _T , rr4 It lnis permi.t requires a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval ,Engineer"s (Public Wopks) reyiew and approval, a planning'Department revjew or Health Department review, and a review by the Builiing Department, the estjnated tjme for a total revjew may take as longas three weeks. All commercial (large or small) and all multi-family permits will have tq follow the above mentioned maximum requirements. Residential and.small projects should take a lesser amount of t'ime. However, ifrest'dential or smaller projects impact the various above mentioned departments with regard to necessary review, these projects mayalso take the three week period. Every attempt will be made by th'is departnent to expedite thispermit as. sgon as possible. I, the undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time frame. (o,'ro=- 8-2a -qsDate Work Sheet was turned into the Communi ty Development Department. oo J 75 3outh lronlage road Yail, colorado 81657 (303) 479-2138 ot 479-2L39 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Read and acknowledged by: b* 2e -nz offlce of communlty developmenl ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED WIIH IHE TOWN OF VAIL TOWN OF VArL PUBLTC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT l,tARCH 15, 1988 CONSTRUCTION PARKING & MATERIAL STORAGE rn suuunary' ordinance No. G states ttrat it is unrawful for anvperson to litter, track or deposit any soil, rock, sand, debrisor rnaterial, including trash dunpsters, portable toilets andworkmen vehicles upon any street, sidewalk, alley or public Pl1ge or any portion thereof. The right-of-way on afl Town ofVail streets and roads is approxirnately 5 ft. 6ff pavernent.This ordinance will be strillty enforced by the Town of Vailey!]ic works Department. persons found viotating this ordinancewill be given a 24 hour written notice to remove-said material .In the event the person so notified does not comply with thenotice within the 24 hour tirne specified, the pulfic WorksDepartment will remove said nateiiat at tbe expense of personnotified. The provisions of this ordinance sfr-aff not beapplicable to construction, naintenance or repair projects ofany street or alley or any utilities in the right-a-way. To review Ordinance No. 6 in full, please stop by the Town ofVail Building Departnent to obtain a copy. tfrank you for yourcooperation on this matter. $ Ka*ee- lvtlOra.<g!2- Date Project (i.e. contractor,owner) ol PIan Review Based on the 1991 Uniform Codes NAME: GOLDEN PEAK RESTROOMS DATE:9-9-93 ADDRESS:45SVAILVALLEYDR CONTRACTOR: VAIL, COLORADO ARCHITECT: FRITZ-EN"PIERCE OCCI.JPANCY: B-2 ENGINEER: KIM MCGHEE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-IHR PLANS EXAMINER:DAN STANEK CORRECTIONS REQUIRED The items listed below are not intended to be a complete listing of all possible code requirements in the adopted codes. It is a guide to selected sections of the codes. The following is not to be construed to be an approval of any violation of any of the provisions of the adopted codes or any ordinance of the Town of Vail. 1. BATHROOMS TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 3105 OF TT{E 1991 UBC. 2. LrGHT AND VENTTLATTON REQUTRED AS pER SEC.705 OF TTrE 1991 UBC. 3. FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. 4. FrELD TNSPECTION REQUIRED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. 5. FOUNDATION MAY NEED TO BE INSPECTED BY A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER BEFORE BEING APPROYED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. 6. WALLS AND FLOORS OF RESTROOMS TO MEET SEC 510 OF THE 1991 UBC. 7. WATER IIEATER TO HAVE A PAN IJNDER M AND A PIPED TO EXTERIOR OF BT]ILDING. 8. E)flTS DOORS AND EXIT SIGNS TO COMPLY WTITI CHAPTER 33 OF TI{E 199I I.JBC. KRM COHEULTAI{TSr IHC.P.g? G f.lNf,f- Iw6' 2 'G"- I:opt, lgatw 4fiht fr ur! q -{ .tr*'+ t wt Lft.'+ ? l'a.(4hatwe): -: . ". lzl - ltt,e cnV|log , :*f-Qottot+" ..-- ifrtft ?. rtol.-'V/Vr'- fl.rilaP '' irtl--- g- :6s'iq;t6- .e ot Qvail.@ Vail Associates, Inc. Creators and Onerators of Vail and Beaver CreelP Resorts May 21, 1993 Ms, Kristan PritzDirector of Comnunity Developnent Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Roadvail, co aL657 RE: Golden Peak Base facility Publie Restroom Facilities PROPOSED REPLACE!,TENT OF EXISTING FACILITY tF"ft ) Please clarify the necessary approval convenience as it is our i-ntention to upcoming L993-94 ski season. Sincerely, process at your earliest replace this facility prior to cc: Chris Rynan Booie Alward Susie fjossern Tin Kehoe ,on^'\ "d Dear Kristan: VaiI Associates, Inc. is currently planning the replacernent of the existing public Eeglfegn facilities which are located below the adult ski sch5ot sates'-aGT-a, accessible on the north side of the Golden Peak Base facility. As I am sure you are ahrare, these facilities are outdated, undersized and in no way rneet the current requirements for accessibility. It is for these reasons that we are motivated to replace these public restroom facilities in a new, free standing hglfdilrg in close proximity to the existing buildinqs. The space, ciiiEntiy occupied-by the public restroons, would be used to expand ski school locker iacilities. The purpose of this correspondence is to seek clarification from the Town of VaiI with regard to the necessary approval process in order to proceed with this project. Because the proposed improvements represent a replacement of an existing taclfity currently allowed in ttre Special Developrnent District zoning, it is our interpretation that the project would not necessitate an anendment to the Special- Developnent District zoning and would only require Design Review Board approval as weil as a buil<iing permit. , Director Developnent GPBF.7 Post Office Box 7 r Vail, Colorado 81658 . USA - (l0l) 476-5601 6-r-uall fO I /7)I r,/ ,/'^/4 1L,-./ @ n-\t:./,h/-u /v?yt1-J /r.'.,-'y' L. .g,"- ,n;,^- D{hrr'z /.. .-,-'--.-1 ,z{ 4 tl s. L.,r/ ,1, s *^ . /rr1 b,*-Z/r /C/^i// (n1.. /'/t df.' -&"5 c,-t/^J ,=,..'-n-,/ b.*;ll , ,,..,-,c/ {* : 4.4 z.'.*..-Ar,^-.--f fu F [.*- dtl' rt-a^q'^.'1t, 72,t rtn+,'t *'L^*il o-/r--t 6.- './'1 /^ *; / ../. ,/6z-:t/,h6 (^/ 2.4 ,-L--,n .,/*) a u 'oto-'' J oo t66tszlvl!o't|)t Qvail.@ Vail Associates, Inc. Creators an.l Operators of Vail and Beaver Creel€ Ylay 2L, 1993 Ms. Kristan PritzDirector of Comnunity Development Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Roadvail, co 81657 RE: Golden Peak Base Facility rd- Lift Departnent Operations/Locker Building PROPOSED REPI,ACEI{ENT OF EXISTTNG FACILITY Dear Kristan: VaiI Associates, Inc. is currently planning to replace the existingbuilding, located irnnediately east of tne base of Chair 12 at coldenPeak. The purpose of this correspondence is to seek clarification fronthe Town of Vail with regard to the necessary approval process in orderto proceed with the project. The existing 6in9f!*s'98$ building is approximately 16 | X 24r andcontains the lift operator facilities, lift departnent storage asas locker facilities for lift department personnel. our proposal replace the facility with a slightly larger above grade buildingfull basement below. Enclosed please find one (1) copy of thepreliminary plans for the proposed replacement facility for your consideration. Because the proposed improvements represent a replacement of an existingfacility currently allowed in the special developnent district zoning,it is our interpretation that the project would not necessitate an arnendment to the SDD zoning and would only require Design Review Boardapproval as well as a building perurit. Please clarify the necessaryapproval process at your earliest convenience as it is our intention toreplace this facility prior to the upcorning L993-94 ski season. Sincerely, cc: A1 ColbyBill Pierce Chris Rynan Dave Larson Tim Kehoe I/j^:f-* welLis towith a('.--/ -/ )| - l*r"-J J TJ ,4** lr'') t 5 c+t'z )F _+_a 7 f'' :i" { li\ r' I 1 Development Post Office Box 7 o Vail, Colorado 81658 o USA - (301) 476-5601 .,,#i^li1tl'fi16ir!,Ui'&;?;:il*,3s':1*31i'""i$"#,ril .eq1 srlels ropeva p9!6'ap:9-!"t"-=9* 3Xl-..-,.,-..-,""",-rrcerruurs progt'f rbEi2- orthree 3" caliper aspens. lo_replace the 4" caliper aspen - the applicant should provide two2.5" caliper aspens; to replace the two iarge honeysuckle shru.bs - the applicant should provide one-or Mo d, evergreens and/or honeysuckle shrubs. Also, the attached site/landscape plan shows the new large ptanter to be approximatety 350square feet in area. staff recommends that this planter c-ourb oe eniargro "n additional 5 to10 feet to the north to accommodate the replacement landscaping. tn6 intent or tnissuggestion is to create a landscape area that will positively imbait m" ir"". Small Planter: v.STAFF RECOMMENDATION Large Planter: Small Planter: Staff recommends approval of the request to amend the development plan at Gold peak SkiBase to-allow the proposed building that will accommodate locker room and restroom facilities.The staff believes that this application meets the Design Stanoaros/Criieria lor Evaluationdiscussed in Section lV of this memorandum. As discussed above, the staff is requesting that any approvals given to this project beconditioned on the trees, and shrubs surviving tr,vo growing seaJons or that they be replacedwith species of similar size (or combination tiereofi. Tnirefore, tlie toiio*ing is a suggestionas to how these treegshrubs should be replaced: tlTo( to repl.ace the 12" cariper dogwood - the appricant shourd provide four Q" caliper trees; to replace the 6', caliper aspen _ the ,r .> ,, appliiant should provide two g,' catiper aspens; io,eptac" tne + two 4" caliper aspens - the applicant should provide iour 2,, or z 3" three 3" caliper aspens. 3 3, !o r_eplace the 4" caliper aspen - the applicant should provide two -,..*!2.5" cafiper aspens; to replace the two large honeysuckle ('/u' shrubs - the applicant should provide one or two 5' evergre ens_+__2.t"_and/or honeysuckle shrubs ,^, Also, lhe attached site/landscape plan shows the new large planter to be approximately 350square feet in area. Staff recommends that this planter c-out'o oe "niirg"o an additional 5 to10 feet lo the north to accommodate the replacement landscaping. TnE intent of tnissuggestion is to create a landscape area that will positively impait tne irea. A,lT' jh.. staff is investigating as to whether or not there is currenfly an easement to the Townof Vail lor.the existing bike path that traverses the southern portion of the subject property. lfresearch finds that here is not an easement, the town would like to have a ui[<e pitn'easement granled and would recommend that this be a condition of approval also. c:p€cvn emosvagoldpkT26 Post-lt'" brand fax transmitgl ttrnoi6z oa *--. at 'z/a {2,&;. ,/t o^,. 4'rh3 ' Project Application Z.ren kt tt Proiect Name: Project Descriplion: Contact person and phone ZzsT, r _---___,l i lf o*n"r. Address and phone;.;,a"rlZ:'t,c /a //t/tt /?,4/ /.44 .(r/zr ') /'3/,/< Architect, Address and phone:7t7/ar''l/al,'r,t-V Legal Description: Lot /7+ ktcz y',tz l//t.zq[ t-//Ezra,i- B lock Filing 'zlz /-ZoneCom ments; Design Review Board Motion by: Seconded by: Su m mary: r'/4/6 Dale 6-c ..i',/n ? ,t p_!s4ee8a!4! '5 ZZurzfD Oq A/t [> -] <:. 4t ,(Zrr,'y*rz>f?77_Un, ----*__p<* r/-r n/d{Ut - V/1' le --- - , - O Sratr Approvai oa r.J.^! , uJir Urtl.t\" -:)rJl ao =-64Tim KehbeProject Manager TK/na TKI'{ISC. 4O Oran@ Vai[ Associates, Inc" Creators and Operators of Vail and Beaver CreekG Resorts Septernber 9, 1993 Mr. Dan Stanick Town of VailBuilding Department 75 South Frontage RoadVail, CO AL657 RE: Golden Peak Restrooms Dear Dan! This letter is to confirn that the two offices in the loft will be relocated to the o1d public restrooms that are being convertedto the new ski school locker spaces and offices. Sincerely,cc: Jack Hunn Booie AlwardBill Pierce Post Office Box 7 r Vail, Colorado 81658 o USA - (303) 476-5601 INSPECTION REQUEST TOWN OF VAIL DATE READY FOR LOCATION: PROJECT INSPECTION: ft JOB NAME CALLER TUES I WED? BUILDING:PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATER FOOTINGS / STEEL tr tr tr n tr tr tr FOUNDATION / STEEL FRAMING ROOF & SHEER PLYWOOD NAILING D GAS PIPING INSULATION SHEETROCK tr POOL / H. TUB FINAL ELECTRICAL: B TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr FINAL O FINAL tr APPROVED CORRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED DATE INSPECTOR PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT DATE READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION: JOB NAME N OF (,. 4 REQUEST VAIL '/- I t,z<r' CALLER "/ , 'THUR . FRY )tt -v N,sPECTI ptittotttc:\i,----- .- - E FOOTTNGS PL o tr tr o tr tr UMBING: tr FOUNDATION / STEEL UNDERGROUND ROUGH / D.W.V. ROUGH / WATERO FRAMING - ROOF & SHEER " PLYWooD NAtLtNG GAS PIPING tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB D SHEETROCK NAIL o ! ntr FINAL FINAL I ELECTRIGAL: tr TEMP. POWER t MECHANICAL: tr HEATING n RouqA D EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDTJIT D SUPPLY AIR tr FINAL tr o FINAL '/ffi-ssvEs ]BRECTIONS: E DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED DATE INSPECTOR / 2--=- nA 2--zw INSPECTTON REQUEST,, TQrovN oF vArL/t, - tj,rk-- @ _4;^D RO Ir BE PROJECT Q -r-I r JoB NAME READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION:MON t ,l a CALLER TUES ST_EEh /1_*)t#tr BUILDING:PLUMBING: tr tr UNDERGROUND ROUGH / D.W.V. ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING tr D tr tr tr tr - ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr SHEETROCK POOL / H. TUB NAIL tr tr FINAL .FINAL ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL: tr n tr tr TEMP. POWER tr o tr tr HEATING ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR tr FINAL tr FINAL yrovED CORRECTIONS: ./']', ) D DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED DATE ?- tz-?t INSPECTOR it 2'3o F PROJECT INSPECTION TOW,fiI OFf REQUEST VAILPERMIT NUMEER DATE READY FOR LOCATION: JOB NAME CALLER TUES WED THUR FRIt; ( t { t., $, 1i.r"r.,.eJ BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: EI UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. D ROUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING r-r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr FINAL tr FINAL ELEGTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER ') tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT //)tr SUPPLY AIR ^ 1<'''" tr FINAL O DISAPPROVED ,/.t a'.DATE '7 "/tP 'v :' lNSPEcroR il SPEIN CTION TOWN OF REQUEST VAILF PROJECT INSPECTION: JOB NAME MON WED THUR FRIREADY FOR LOCATION: '- (', BU!LDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLI 'Vr trl trl Ntrl tr UMBING: UNDERGROUND tr FOUNDATION / STEEL ROUGH / D.W.V. tr FRAMING ROUGH / WATER r_.r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING "9&-SZnfio tr INSULATION tr SHEETROCK POOL / H. TUB NAIL tr E]FINAL tr tr FINAL ELEciHl;AL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: O HEATING tr ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr o SUPPLY AIR - tr tr FINAL .1 FINAL D DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: DATE INSPECTOR t INSPECTIONTOWN OF I , )' REQUEST VAILPERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT DATE READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION: JOB NAME CALLER TUES iWED THUR FRI 'L i / 't*'i l--OVED CORRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED BUILDING: D FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEE- tr FRAMING - ROOF & SHEEBu PLvwooD NAILTNG F tr tr tr o GAS PIPING tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL E tr FINAL FINAL ELECTRIGAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: o D tr EI HEATING O ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR tr tr FINAL tr FINAL ('; INSPECTOR PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT oo-r. q /DT JoB NAME ECTION:MONREADY FOR LOCATION: -@WED CALLER' INSPECTION REOUEST TOWN OF VAIL ',,-:F;'rr{',i' ;*.t.,.,,,iri*;r, j}"' LPM"ITHURFBI BUILDING: E(FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH/WATER tr tr tr tr tr tr t] FOUNDATION / STEEL FRAMING ROOF & SHEER PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING INSULATION SHEETROCK tr POOL / H. TUB NAIL tr B trFINAL FINAL EL€GTF[GAL: tr TEMP.. POWER iIEGHANICAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr tr O FINAL tr FINAL D tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: ,o're /- Zf,-f3 . rNsPEcroR ffis{oP e'INSPECTION REQUEST. TOWN OF VAIL/,^.i.' . /.-', , | .,)r,,,t,L lt .,r/rl,,{/ .\./ oare " J/ / JoB NAME READY FOR INSPECTION: LOCATION: CALLER ..'_:- TpES WED, -THUR F RI BUILDING: ' PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATER TINGS / STEEL o tr tr tr D o tr FOUNDATION / STEEL ROOF & SHEER PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING INSULATION SHEETROCK I] POOL / H. TUB tr FINAL ELEGTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: O HEATING tr EXHAUST HOODS CONDUIT.tr SUPPLY AIR tr FINAL OVED tr DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: .-.,.: s/ ;i DATE INSPECTOR 2-.,) l=,lt) OFUMTNPERMI DATE OJECT REQUEST AIL Q7I '--4OB NAME CALLER INSPECTION:MON TUES ^4{weCr" THUR -ffi--",PMr-t-.---,_ ._-READY FOR LOCATION: BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLU OU YA ,enFOP o_ UMBING: UNDERGROUND tr FOUNDATION / STEEL OUGH / D.W.V. OUGH / WATERtr FRAMING D tr ROOF & SHEER PLYWOOD NAILING AS PIPING INSULATION POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAII tr FINAL O FINAL ELECTRICAL: B TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: o tr tr tr HEATING tr tr tr ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR tr FINAL tr FINAL tr APPROVED CORRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED nffisxop oarc f r) - /5 QJ rNSPEcroR IN t SPECTIONTOWN OF ,if'1';1 REQUEST DATE READY FOR LOCATION: i -/1 J C':;' ! JOB NAME CALLER INSPECTION:MON TUES THUR ,;* BUILDlNG: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr UNDERGROUND faoucni D.w.v. ffioucnl wArERtr FRAMING ,- BOOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NA|LING D GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB tr P N. NAIL tr tr trtr FINAL FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER u MECHANICAL: O HEATING tltr ROUdH.tl O EXHAUST HOODS =++tr coN tr tr tr SUPPLY AIR tr- drr FINAL t . , I tr' IiAPPHOVEDil ;ORRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED o REINSPECTION REQUIRED INSPECTOR P,Es,e I PECb?3D /i I',( '7"''.- l ''" 1,i (t'u- e o1 . etls "f ?(".r.1i) ," I rNs TION REQUEST OWN OF VAILPERMIT NUMB R OF PROJECT (-\t-- /Q-z-! -'' / '-- JoB NAMEDATE READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION:MON CALLER TUES e.-f ED a {, co RRECTIONS: THUR -,) BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL Ftultlgtttc: D UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W,V. D ROUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEE- tr FRAMING - ROOF & SHEEB " PLYWOOD NAILING D GAS PIPING tr INSULATION D POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL O FINAL tr FINAL ELECTRIGAL: D TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING ffioucu ) tr EXHAUST HOODS tr tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR N FINAL tr FINAL APPROVED .,...2/',B DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED INSPECTOR niFsuop PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT DATE READY FOR INSPE TION: JOB NAME CALLER TUES*(, /" a)( INSPECTION " z'TOWN ,OF REQUEST VAIL (./- /z I AM PMT a FRI LOCATION: D FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATEB tr FOUNDATION / STEEL FRAMING ROOF & SHEER PEYWOOD NAILING D GAS PIPING INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL ELECTRICAL: n t'eup. PowER O HEATING tr EXHAUST HOODS tr SUPPLY AIR tr FINAL tr APPROVED CORRECTIONS: PPROVED EINSPECTION REQUIBED INSPECTOR NFsgop PERMIT NUMBE INSPECTION, ; TOWN OF :,r{y'* REQUEST VAIL (JDATE READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION: BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND O ROUGH / D.W.V. .FfiOUGH / WATER O FOUNDATION / STEEL tr tr tr tr tr tr FRAMING /4 ,-, 1ifUf GAS PIPING tr POOL/H TUB ROOF & SHEER PI-YWOOD NAILING INSULATION SHEETROCK NAIL FINAL tr tr FINAL ELECTRICAL:MECHANIGAL: tr tr tr tr tr TEMP. POWER o tr HEATING EXHAUSTRyGH CONDUIT HOODS tr SUPPLY AIR - /1 / , ,w:;Jl,r'tZl '( ttrjAL D FINAL ORRECTIONS: O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED r t/' D^rE / t/ '/ /'- / ./ tNSPEcroR ll M ER OF PROJECT READY FOR INSPECTION: LOCATION: b lq-t JoB NAME ':.' /) i..(t, INSPECTION QUEST ilOWN OF IL 4'r'l.%t, ____$1)'"hr>] t2r)RuIT NU luI PEBM DATE CALLER Ives..WED THURIl,,,FRI a BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PL c tr tr tr tr tr tr UMBING: tr FOUNDATION / STEEL UNDERGROUND ROUGH / D.W.V. ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING - ROOF & SHEERu PLYWooD NAILING - GAS PIPING tr INSULATIOiV POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETBOCK NAIL tr_ T] FINAL El FINAL ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL: tr TEMP. POWER Y EATING tr tr tr tr ROPGH {CONDUIT - D EXHAUST HOODS tr SUPPLY AIR FlNAL,, EI tr FINAL rtrtmcxrco fonnecrtorus, tr DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION HEQUIRED oerc /'?-/f, 9) rNSPEcroR I JOB NAME MON INSPECTION REQUEST TOWN OF VAIL CALLER I I a READY FOR LOCATION: SPECTION: ER OF PROJECT BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr FOUNDATION / STEEL ROUGH i D.W,V. tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER tr tr BOOF & SHEEB PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr tr tr FINAL tr FINAL tr FINAL D FINAL APPROYED '/-J'tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED CORRECTIONS: : DATE INSPECTOR t ER OF PROJECT INSPECTION REQUEST TOWN OF VAIL 6n pM JOB NAME READY FOR LOCATION: CALLER BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr tr tr tr tr tr o UNDERGROUND ROUGH / D,W.V. ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING ,- ROOF & SHEER " PLYWooD NAILING GAS PIPING tr INSULATION POOL / H, TUB tr FINAL tr FINAL tr SHEETROCT ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL: B tr tr tr tr TEMP. POWER D HEATING ROUGH tr tr tr tr EXHAUST HOODS CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR FINAL FINAL rdnoveo HRECTIONS: O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED INSPECTOR n!fi*e ' / n J- a,/ll. lJ - ) ,'\J t INSPECTIONTOWN OF REOUEST VAILPERMIT NUMBE OF PROJECT DATE JOB NAME READY FOB INSPECTION:MON \ ..' FRt_i LOCATION: .i BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PL tr tr tr tr tr D tr UMBING: tr FOUNDATION / STEEL UNDERGROUND ROUGH / D.W.V. ROUGH / WATERF,{:RAMTNG tr tr ROOF & SHEEF GAS PIPINGPLYWOOD NAILING INSULATION POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr FINAL O FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: O HEATING tr tr tr ROUGH -: tr EXHAUST HOODS CONDUIT O SUPPLY AIR tr tr FINAL tr FINAL PPROVED tr DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REQUIBED CORBECTIONS: /Lt --z'z -13 prlFsnop -J INSPECTION REQUEST TOWN OF VAIL JOB NAME 1. -x' -, READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION: .. /t'., CALLER TUES THUR FRI .,.@ PM t I a / r', ' ' ,^'/ .-, ^.,4,i )\-[-'-]*t'--. PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT ILDING:PL tr tr tr D o D tr UMBING:BUI trF UT trF l- att tJD tr_ UNDERGROUND ROUGH / D.W,V. ROUGH / WATER FOOTINGS / STEEL FOUNDATION / STEEL FRAMING ROOF & SHEER GAS PIPINGLYWOOD NAILING INSULATION POOL / H. TUB SHEETROCK NAIL tr FINAI-tr FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: o o tr tr tr HEATING tr D tr ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS CONDUIT SUPP.LY AIR "oJ^.FINAL L&!^orro )ORRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED fr i { \ t INSPECTOR *iRs"* -- t INSPECTIONTOWN OF DATE ]b IZK JOB NAME INSPECTION:MON CALLER TUES THUR REQUEST VAIL -"\.AM (-ry I I a WEDREADY FOR LOCATION:<,".?'-, ! I.' tr tr tr o tr x tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND O ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATER FOUNDATION / STEEL FRAMING ROOF & SHEER PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING INSULATION _tr POOL / H. TUB SHEETROCK NAIt tr FINAL tr FINAL tr TEMP. tr ROUGH tr HEATING tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED CH;;;";;. INSPECTOR t .1-. -Z- PERMIT NUMB R ROJECT 4t DATE READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTI JOB NAME INSPECTIO REQUEST TOWN VAIL ,/ -') CALLEB t I I PM OF :c) BUILDING; ) - __,::*-'*..-PLUMBING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL UNDERGROUND ROUGH i D,W.V, ROUGH i WATER D FOUNDATION / STEEr- FRAMING ROOF & SHEER PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING INSULATION POOL / H. TUB SHEETROCK NAIL tr FINAL tr FINAL ELECTRIGAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING D tr tr ROUGH o tr tr EXHAUST HOODS CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR tr FINAL O FINAL tr REINSPECTION REQUIREDVEDtr DISAPPROVED INSPECTOH 'ir' /^zznW-/./u rNs PECTION REQUEST OF VAIL 7\ tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED F PROJECT JOB NAME READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECT t I I M neeaov=o { 'coRREcIoNS: z tr DISAPPROVED PERMIT NU tl BUILDING: D FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: O UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING ,_ ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr POOL i H, TUB O FINAL tr FINAL ELECTRTqAt:. i tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING tr EXHAUST HOODS tr SUPPLY AIR FINAL CONDUIT DATE INSPECTOR e 23. PERMTT Nu-MEen or pno.lecr INSPECTION REQUEST TOWN OF VAIL oere Il/ Z JoB NAME INSPECTION:MON CALLER TUES ,-ttii7, (l/'--<- LrelREADY FOR LOCATION: BUILDING: O FOOTINGS / STEEL PL o tr tr tr tr o tr UMBING: tr FOUNDATION / STEEL UNDERGROUND ROUGH i D.W.V. ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING D tr ROOF & SHEER PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING INSULATION POOL / H. TUB D SHEETROCK NAIL tr tr FINAL tr FINAL fLECTRICALT \\4-*---/" O TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr ROUGH D HEATING tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR A tr FINAL tr APPROVED )RRECTIONS: DISAPPBOVED { nerruseecroN REeUTRED hiisror D^rE //* 3-9: rNSPEcroR z- r' ,. .: ,.,1 '-' \.,-INSPECTION REQUEST VAILPEBM DATE BER OF PROJECT INSPECTION:READY FOR LOCATION: rT Nr..l lt /" /02t, I / JOBNAME h BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr FOUNDATION / STEEL - tr tr tr o tr UNDERGROUND ROUGH i D.W.V. ROUGH / WATERO FRAMING r-r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr SHEETROCK POOL / H. TUB ELECTRICAL: O TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: O HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr FINAL INAL .'. tr APPROVED CORRECTIONS: DISAPPROVED REINSPECTION REQUIRED INSPECTOR 673d INSPECTION REQUEST TOWN OF VAIL B REINSPECTION REQUIRED PERMIT NUMBEB OF PROJECT IUWN UI- VAIL / t- 4 JoB NAME &Pttt ^OO DATE 3 CALLER } READv FOR TNSpECTON: MON rUES @O) "'r" FRI - AM @"LocArloN. tt. < ? t/ U trt 'J .Fnppnoveo O DISAPPROVED BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: D UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH i D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION O POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr FINAL tr FINAL MECHANICAL: D HEATING tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR \ Lg' I ORRECTIONS: DATE INSPECTOR 'r((!') 3 PERMIT NUMqER PF PROJECT .'i TOWN OFt/'' /./ lt c'' t / . 6 //:......--DATE ii JOB NAME INSPECTION:MON CALLER TUES WED i READY FOR LOCATION:) lt!;L l'/qL INSPECTION REQUEST VAIL t'/ (#uR'' FRI tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D,W.V. tr ROUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEE- D FRAMING r.r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING D GAS PIPING tr POOL / H. TUB ELEGTBICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: O HEATING -ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS tr SUPPLY AIR tr FINAL tr APPROVED CORRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED INSPECTOR DATE JOB NAME -.Iv .INSPECTION i - ,r-\ i. , , \ ''ir (- REQUEST var,L i',' ,1 L-4 TION: CALLER TUES. (.s_+-READY FOR INSPFP LOCATION: n MON ,)G;J' Eg!!!49.--) tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: D UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING r-r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING D GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL 11 /\f.l il r tr F'NAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: D HEATING tr tr tr ROUGH tr tr tr EXHAUST HOODS CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR F f,{{AL tr FINAL ,PROVED RECTION tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED b:ONS: - DATE /J' 3- r1 INSPECTOR -f-o . ;'' Pldect Application i /r,/tt/q zl'\^to / -t t / Projecl Name:{t', &t Proiect Oescription: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone:rtf Architecl, Address and Phone: t/?4 lJ77 klcz I (tz t//Lt,/q'r <al fi z , ,r,,1 BIock F ilingLegal Descr Comments: iption: Lot 1b &*r K< Zone - Design Review Board Date '' Motion by:,/zttm- Brar,rzPP 6-C; DISAPPROVAL lwA Atr rVt/ -* SzZi ./4ztn> summary: '/r oc' y'a PPn' E statt Approval o TOWN OF VAIL 75 Sortb Frontage Roail Vtil, Colorado 816J7 3 0t-479-21 I I / 479-21 19 D e partment of Communi4l Deo elo pmcnt M fult t.f,t FAx PHoNE NUMBER: /7V'725{/a- t--FRIM: '///h / /.42/ //one; 4/a/71 nue' # oF PAGES rN DOCUMENT(S) (NOT TNCLUDTNG COVER SHEET): RESPONSE REQUIRED? SENT BY: TOWN OF VAIL FAX PHONE NUMBER: {303) 479-2452 TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PHONE NUMBER. (303) A79-2138 SPECIAL NOTES: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT l np COMPANY NAME:t/4 frf 72fz-/47rtz,d Return to INTER.DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT: It1' // (- tlTtttDEu ItLPL [t=TEata /,2ltz DATE SUBMITTED: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARI COMMENTS NEEDED BY: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: 2r"*) 7e*z ,o-/t 1^./*/ fht FIRE DEPARTMENT Reviewed by:-4c;'-n-Date:7' ': c' '23 comments: z*.*-.,-r)7-? o, -:o"7 ,:' -.n:'o';14a1r.3.- ,-ti) '--*'Z- "t'na';f-s- e+''4'' < z '4' ':t'zo--- -:ZZu/ t')-z-'"-<'zay' '';lt/e /"/ ,,,t17ary2-,.' {}12,..;';;21-,.. -7i>*-/ 2f ,''5f '42-';<:' {; r/ z-. --Z <:.,--z-.A2a',z.,el An$ € y'.+zt" /4-a /.'r ,i' < "'-t'4 f,\"r'el;z r /lrr //ft./71-2257)) )\__ Town Planner rvri..d l lrYl2 fO'${r 7/z-t- O /)i /-. // /,", t./ t tl / Return lO t ,//z Vt-tl v Town Planner INTER.DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW /) .-,-)///tL /(r<-i'ot.rn ,/nc,1i/-&n,rk,''t DATE OF PUBLIC HEAR COMMENTS NEEDED BY: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: 2zr, ) Vl*z C/t-t*./-u./ /bt ,t/ /'tB /'/s ' M.i,l ./- rl Il Reviewed by:61nrr, H'..lt Pds3-l Comments: I ) ftI"1W f r". J" c |,.o,t- (\u r,c.r- I T+ .,, J* t", ''L,,, 4^-t /"n J s"uo,,., or .J-t , '- /.I s"-/"ff t*.yrov(t".-<.-J'> l^;A i7,,,.-l v{'-i/-/ A,l'<- c^-t o,.-t I J r-u )J--s-z( J/t-.--'-- , 1,,", 1.- af f |',\'\' (\ , S) A,-'.,'4hr, "-(r,svt".'r'tJs {,r-* Q, l) 'Pn,.L h ),,,t,n )., r *'1,',--1, r'''u l'l L'' L "'" C [""], j 'PunJ c.5 z'. r,., : a) *h^ { 6u.- ) l"q p1".," J)n (, v r,y.\ I /,6nho,- y^tc.,- Fr I tz | €rn P i.rE|| Er I nrr 39C4?64991 Y ErltzlennerceArtnc? ARcfltIECTURt pLAIl ]t0 lNtlRroRs T0r 'ft1 ftLrr{ FR0M: @U4i. dP/FB DATE: 'l'ltt'7\ FI)(! PEOIE: PAoEtor 5 PAoEE P.Ot W'. 6ot-l;dl$ t,mr{lEAl!>l\ ZEl.ryAt+la- eJVlo*lC{ 1000 Lto$RrD€€rotr vAt c0t0n D00t050PA$T ofFfcE BO( 57 !03 476 5642 tA)( totr {76 4901 lilSfiosle StU9whms'lr0wflllo.lltltl t,rDultlllr Vrr Eirttkl Fr i iz len P iercr 6E | 40Pt'1 Br i ner 3e34?64991 o 5g392SlE4lr36I 4"9 . JUL gI '83 H5ILIBPII EEH?. EVI! F I EF NEFEN F,rftffittr 9a2 h,(wE 4 bxbx? iraf 't ! tltlrtrcO FlOlt in lear. blonlnj Fr0vent c0NlrAIurr.-gNoLoEUtE REQUIT$$I{T8 l. boor openlrS turt tll0 tr:t tct0flr 7. Truolc lpprcrch duEt br 40 lcet atrrtght ln end l€vcl, . 3. &qet canacr hevr lron? lvr ln ttdtr to DEtillt dlrrct Eruch llptccth, 4, f,oo! uurt br 4 fcrt ht5hrt tl'trn coilEllnsr ld ftottt and 3 lmt htgtrr J, Drrcru rurr br rblc to tc* lr tbc olln Depltlott to Frrvgnc winC frou, toorr ehut. 0. loEtofl cf rnglcrrrrc dccue nuot le ot lceaC 18 {nchrt abovo 6rounrl to coorr fros pucltlnS fnor. P.ch. 7, B.ch 0t encloturs shall br { fcet llctper 0, ltood trt ot oonclrt. ftlrrd netrJ" porcr gnclorura to larvr rt b10k!to!. thtn oottalnlu. REquitrErnBr r.nt tst Bltr lfurlo Byrtrnr VrlI frclllcy Drlrr rhall Ds plrcrtl rt thl rcrr..g{*!* 6Fr br.rr- brand ru ,,r,#(&fr{lf nn $ ...J \ \ ,{ :r I t:t. I I' i ;i i ;' !' !, i, l. li li it. I ! I:.i: o J3u! Jg .tJa!d rJalrl! Jl o 'EgE \il TLf vl \ \ fr SL *Nd ='dr$ =N:- hfi -\ie $ $s*F o tEett J.u ! JII aaJs!d ualzl ! Jl . .irFllt.;. $. TI t/t -\ R t$.,, il $ H $ il' 'r$$ $ {* y l*_$ R ,l i t Ii I I Irl l$tl I o ubtryJ, ",1. g | \{{ o 'e ,)i, Oi ,. / ,, ilfE,o'ANpuir L '/^lil,rn fklll " ,r"{," ., -r t pranning and Environmenrar commission ' 'ffi, / W /rt ( CommunigDevelopmentDepartment , - : / / -t July26, lees k/iYlnt{/ u/" k 'il& u' 'ii41 ila"( " A request to amend the development plan for $e Golden Peak Ski Base Area to allow a building for restrooms and locker rooms located at Tract F, Vail Village 5h Filing/458 Vail Valley Ddve. Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Tim Kehoe Tim Devlin I. BACKGROUND On December 7, 1983, Ordinance No. 45, Series of 1983 imposed the Ski Base\Recreation Zone District on lhis site. Vail Associates, Inc., has submitted an application to amend the Development Plan of the Ski Base\Recreation Zone District, in order to allow the construction' of a new two story building that will accommodate locker room and restroom facilities. . II. DESCRPNON OF THE REOUEST Vail Associates, Inc. is proposing to construct a new two story building that will accommodate restroom facilities on the upper level and locker room facilities on the lower level. The new building will be directly to the east of the existing tennis coults at Golden Peak, and directly north ol the existing two story ski school building. The new building will have a total area of approximately 1984 square feet, with approximately 992 square feet on each of the two levels. The proposed building will match the existing structures in materials and color (i.e. cedar siding, stucco, built-up roof). The new building is proposed to be connected to the ski school building on the south by a second level metal grate walkway that will allow for circulation between the two buildings. Please see the attached site plan. As part of this proposal, the applicant is proposing to remove two existing railroad-tie planters that are in the general area of where the new building is to be constructed. One of these existing plantea is approximately 135 square feet in area, and contains a 12" caliper dogwood, a 6" caliper asipen, and two 4" caliper aspens. The other planter, approximately 95 square feet in area, curently contains one 4" caliper aspen and two large honeysuckle shrubs. The applicant is proposing to redace tnth of hese planten wih new planters of equal or greater area, and all of the o<isting trees and shrubs are proposed to be replanted in the new planters. Please reference the attached site plan for a better understanding of his description. /ul /** - E/lrrt v7'u*/ 6z/- n"*, L' 6 4/44'v-( '44' (u, "' lrrl '/ "1n)/.2 - +> FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Applicant: Plannen /f,4 - *1"/,' Ju/ /i*'- *'L,,y' L ?xs/"T t"/ /)i%e ,(F- a"/r/ -^"/' Dr't/ -r,Vrr'rJ . Dr//^-s/a/rr; raa fuaftr,,, ,1,i,,- - /t-t'rtt,-n-t/t s;rtzt'</ .*.//. t'"-' r-1"j /^r.- V/ -)/ avo5,/n ,'/ ,/dt/'*rrt ",,"'+/t'^s A"'// 'o4/z'(z t7t'74+s4kz- o''fYJ il. zoNrNG coNsrpERAnoNs Ski lockers/employee loc-ker rooms are a permltted use within the main building, aocording to the approved Development Plan in he Ski Base/RecreaUon Zone District. Statf considers the public restrooms to be an acoessory use that is incidental to the ski base area. An amendment to the Development Plan ls required in order to allow the construction of this new building. lt is he stafi's opinion that the prcposed building does not change the substance of the apprwed future plan nor the curenl dwelopment plan. The size, l@ation, and uses witrin the new building do not depan from the intent of the ski base development plan or the purpose of the zone districl whidt states: "The ski base recreation district is intended to prori@ for the base lacililies necessary to operate a ski mountain and to allow multi-family residential dwellings as a secondary use if ceiain criteria are met. In addition, summer recreational uses and facilities are encouraged to adrieve multi-seasonal use of some of the facilities and prwide efficient use ol the facilities." (18.39.010 - Purpose) The Ski Base/Recreation Zone Distdct is more closely associated with the Special Development District than any of the other zone districts in the Town of Vail. The approved Development Plan for the Ski Basey'Recreation District, in conjunction with the design standards/criteria for evaluation, establish fte requirements for development and uses for the property. IV. DESIGN STANDARDS/CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION The development plan for he Ski Base\Recreation Zone District shall meet each of the following standards, or demonstrate that either one or more is not applicable, or hat a practical solution consistent with public interest has been achieved: A. The developer will provide a butter zone in areas where the Ski Base\Recreation District boundary is adjacent to a resideniial use distlict boundary. The buffer zone must be kept free of buildings or structures, and must be landscaped, screened to protect it by natural teaturEs 30 that adverge effects on the surrounding areas ane minimized. This may require a bufbr zone of sufficient size to adequately separate the propoced uge from the surrounding properties in terms of visual privacy, noise, adequde light air, air pollution, signage, and other comparable potentially incompatiblc lacton. The proposed new structure is to be located directly east of the existing tennis courb and approximately 150 feet soufr of Vail Valley Drive. Statf does not beliwe that this new building will impact the adjacent residential neighborhood. Statf also believes that the applicant has proposed adequate landscaping to replace he landscaping that will be removed, This landscaping includes two planters, and is shown on the attached site plan. Staff believes hat the new building will be screened adequately by the existing buildings to the east and south, and by the proposed planters. B. The circulation 3ystem desigrcd for the type of traffic Aenerated, taking into consideration, safety, separation from living area, convenience, access, noise, Lr+o end exha$t controb. Private intemalrreet3 may be permitted it they can be used by police and fire department vehicles lor emergency purposes. Bicycle traffic shall be congidered and provided when the 3ite is to be used for regidential purposes. Section 18.52.100(C8) of the Municipal Code shtes that the amount of required parking lor recreational facilities (public and pdvate) is to be determined by the PEC. The new building will contrain restroom and employee locker room facilities that are accessory and incidental to the ski base area. The stafl does acknowledge that the l new employee locker rooms will probably bring more employees to his area. For this / reason, the stafl recommends that the existing parking remain as guest parking and ) ttrat tne additional employeas be required to car-pool or use the bus system lo access \ the area. The new building is to be located directly adiacent to an odsting parking area, and staff believes that police and fire department vehicles will have acoess to the structure in case of an emergency. Aside from this ooncem, statf believes that the proposed structure will have no impact on the criteria listed above. Functional openlpace in terms of: optimum pre3ervation of naturalfieatures (including trees and drainage areas), recreation, viewg, convenience, and function. Although the applicant is proposing to remove two existing planters, hey will be replaced by planters of fte same or of larger size. The applicant is proposing to replace the landscape materials that exist in the planters to be removed with species of comparable size in the new planters. In terms of views, staff does not believe fiat the proposed two story structure will negatively impact views since it is located between two existing buildings. Staff does believe that the proposed locker room and restroom facilities are being provided in response to the increased public demand for these facilities. The variety in terms of housing type, densities, facilities, and open spaoe. Since the new building will be located on an area lhat is currently covered by asphalt, and since housing is not proposed, the staff believes that the applicant's request will have no impact on the criterion listed above. Privacy in terms of the n€eds of: individuals, families' and neighbors. Since the proposed structure is located between two buildings, the tennis courts, and a parking area, the staff believes frat the applicant's request will have no impact on the criterion listed above. Pedestrian traffic in terms of ssfety, separation, convenience, acoe83 to points of destination and anracti\reness. 4z/Zfv c. D. F. G. o +d Statf believes that the pedestrian circulation s)rstem that is being proposed will actually improve the situation at Golden Peak. The applicant has designed exterior stairs that will provide more direct access to the ski mountain, which will be more convenieflt to the users ot the builclings in the complex. Staff believes hat the new building is compatible with the o<isting structures, and is attractive in appearance. Statf does not beliane that the proposed building will have an adveee lmpact on any safety issues. Further, staff believes that the new building does not conflict with any pedestrian traffic and is sited conveniently between the facilities at Golden Peak. Building Upe in terms of approprlatcncrc to demity, site relationshlp and bulk. Staff believes that the proposed building is appropriate in terms ol density, site relationship and bulk. The proposed building has a footprint ol approximately 992 square feet, is appoximately 1984 square feet in area, and is 24 feet in helght. Staff beliares hat the new building would be in scale with the adjacent two buildings, which have heights of 36 feel (east buildingl and 24 feet (south building). Staff also believes that the architecture and materials will be compatible with the existing structures. Landscaping of $e total 3ib in term3 ot: purposes, types, maintenance, suitability, and affect on the neighborhood. Section 18.39.210 (Landscaping) states hat "all areas within the area(s) of disturbance in the landscape plan not ocqJded by building, ground level decks or patios, or parking shall be landscaped." As pad of tris proposal, the applicant is proposing to remove two existing planters that are in the general area of where the new building is to be constructed. The planters, although relatively small in area, provide much needed greenery for the site. One of these existing planters is approximately 135 square feet in area, and contains a 12" caliper dogwood, a 6" caliper aspen, and two 4- callper aspens. The other planter, approximately 95 square feet in area, cunenty contilns one 4" caliper aspen and two large honeysuckle shrubs. The applicant is proposing lo replace both of these plantes with new planters of equal or greater area, and all of the existing trees and shrubs are proposed to be replanted in he new planters. Please note that stiaff has reviewed the existing landscape proposal with Todd Oppenheimer, the town's landscape architect. Todd is of the opinion that the odsting root system of the dogwood tree in the large planler is too extensive to allow it to be transplanted. Also, he is not be sure that the aspen trees nor the honeysuckle shrubs that are proposed to be tramplanted will survive. The statf is requesting that any apprwals given to this project be conditioned on the trees and shrubs suruMng two growing seasons or that hey be replaced with species of similar size (or combination thereof). Therefore, the following is a suggestion as to how these trees/shrubs should be replaced: to replace the 12" caliper dogwood - fte applicant should provide four 3" caliper trees; to replace he 6" caliper aspen - the applicant should provide two 3" caliper aspens; to replace the H. Large Planten o\l+ Small Planten two 4" caliper aspens - the applicant should provide four 2" or three 3" caliper aspens. to replace the 4" caliper aspen - the applicant should provide two 2.5" caliper aspens; to replace the two large honeysuckle shrubs - the applicant should provide one or two 6' evergreens and/or honeysuckle shrubs. Also, the attached site/andscape plan shows he new laqe planter to be approximately 350 square feet in area. Staff recommends that ftis planter could be enlarged an additional 5 to 10 feet to the north to accommodate the replacement landscaping. The intent of this suggestion is to create a landscape area that will positively impact the area. V. STAFFRECOMMENDANON Staff recommends approval ol tre request to amend the dwelopment plan at Gold Peak Ski Base to allow the proposed building that will accommodate locker room and restroom facilities. The staff believes that this application meets the Design StandarddOriteria for Evaluation discussed in Section lV of this memorandum. As discussed above, the strafl is requesting that any approvals given to this proiect be conditioned on the trees and shrubs sulviving two growing seasons or that hey be replaced with species of similar size (or combination thereof). Therefore, the following is a suggestion as to how these trees/shrubs should be replaced: ,\4at Large Planten Also, the attached site/landscape plan shows the new large planter to be approximately 350 square feet in area. Statf recommends that fiis planter could be enlarged an additional 5 to 10 feet to the north to accommodate the replacement landscaping. The intent of this suggestion is to create a landscape area that will positively impact the area. Also, the statf is investigating as to whether or not there is currently an easement to the Tovwt of Vail for the existing bike path that traverses the southern portion of the subject property. lf research linds that there is not an easement, the town would like to have a bike path easemenl granted and would recommend that this be a condition of approval also. c:p€cvndnosvagoldpkT26 SmallPlanter: to replace the 12" caliper dogwood - the applicant should provide lour 3" caliper trees; to replace he 6' caliper aspen - the {, t " appliiant should provide two 3" caliper aspens; to replace the : - two 4" caliper aspens - the applicant should provide four 2" or z- ) three 3" caliper aspens. 3 3" to replace the 4" caliper aspen - the apdicant should provide two 2.5" caliper aspens; to replace the two large honeysuckle shrubs - the applicant should provide one or two 6' evergreens 7 2,5' and/or honeysuckle shrubs. z- tt dl ';{g 't.*t t. ia..rii. '!.'r :- "i,i ::' r' ::tr;:,..1. :r{.x; 't,:i i-{:,:;:i :irt,S,' $iqt:;<N'- ;t?-i'ii,: ) , r i ..': ;' .ii'.: *,'.+it,. \,d s r 'r:! ':,.-r., .. .) i iii$1i;: .;; i#*,,j .-#iii*t*+ l.'}'*.,,,,t" i,.' :1'.. {. :i.l,t-' i,:r: , t1r;-;;r,"1.., ' ,i ,...r,1. l. _.-.i . . , ;::t - ";"i 1;... 1,''j' l. '': ;.j. '! i.,". J'. . r+i'ffi; l*'ii?,-s*" Wffi s fl.\i z<- - - - - - -- -.1 I I I I .lr \ HJ:rF.TfrA;Ellj,Il\-_.j t H$ il5 I[i Fli i*q t( a' ''?i-' iql-''" tr'f ' - -' fr;- *'/'l- w *f { /4';/' D/E- s/'r? /tr-" U5* ./4 ,/-A fl n, rLsl /ue .@ ffi? ,/,A t ) 2*rrr-</ n/*u l7/2.-s +.*< ,h4 ,a-./"t /ryf:*/-,-'".<l-r*//, p-ts . A- aJ /4- ,/*/- p /*' t'"/6ft n ?y' / % /""*>'/ 5/r// t-b"1 z'7L# fu- tL"/ *- ("'(/ t/'h' UZ /t'r'-| "l/n I *'l*l /Lil /'^ Ln- Pfs sil aZ faL' t* ?"h s /*i //'*at/d/ /rl/,, ,-t p/'2 - s/-'2-/ & ,?Zrt ,e'+ . /rr*- e/ ,'/ /*/ fr^*- ?td-i / kL ffi'r"/' /, /L- o'*4/A' 'f *2/ J*L- /e ; rv/'w# A, ilol^- &* P '/6//4.'z/t{zs ,to-l*-HV /tn /t4, 5lferT + /ilAatce-- t-tt-.*fu. 44 ?+ta*'s- Yrt * /i'/4 2 tu. ,/ -'o ,4 firtr'e - fusi ^/*---'* *f4 ,t<s tV/*',b 4A /h( tA- tr- f au- /o ' k A/et ''/-o IPPPVD>' lr TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: o MEMORANDUM Planning and Environmental Gommission Community Developmenl Depanment Applicant: Planner: o F tLE t?opv July 26, 1993 A request to amend the development plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base Area to allow a building for restrooms and locker rooms located at Tract F, Vail Village 5h Filing/458 Vail Valley Ddve. Vail Associates, Inc., reprcsented by Tim Kehoe Tim Devlin I. BACKGROUND On December 7, 1983, Ordinance No. 45, Series of '1983 imposed the Ski Base\Recreation Zone District on this site. VailAssociates, Inc., has submitted an application to amend the Development Plan of the Ski Base\Recreation Zone District, in order to allow the construction ol a new two story building that will accommodate locker room and restroom facilities. II. DESCRIPNON OF THE REOUEST vail Associates, Inc. is proposing to construct a new two story building that will accommodate restroom facilities on the upper level and locker room facilities on the lower level. The new building will be directly to the east of the existing tennis courts at Golden Peak, and directly north of the existing two story ski school building. The new building will have a total area of approximately 1984 square feet, with approximately 992 square feet on each of the two levels. The proposed building will match the o<isting strustures in materials and color (i.e. cedar siding, stucco, built-up roof). The new building is proposed to be connected to the ski school building on he south by a second level metal grate walkway that will allow lor circulation between the two buildings. Please see the attached site plan. As part of this proposal, the applicant is proposing to remove two existing railroad-tie planters that are in the general area o{ where the new building is to be constructed. One of these existing planters is approximately 135 square feet in area, and contains a 12" caliper dogwood, a 6" caliper aspen, and two 4" caliper aspens. The other planter, approximately 95 square feet in area, currcntly contains one 4" caliper aspen and two large honeysud<le shrubs. The applicant is proposing to replace both of these planters with new planters of equal or grealer area, and all of the existing trees and shrubs are proposed to be replanted in the new planters. Please reference the attached site plan lor a better understanding of this description. o IJ III. ZONING CONSIDERATPNS Ski lockerVemployee locker rooms are a permltted use within the main building, according to the approved Development Plan in he Ski Base/Recreation Zone District. Statf considers the public restrooms to be an aooessory use that is incidental to the ski base area. An amendment to the Development Plan is required in order to allow the construction of this new building. lt is the staff's opinion that the proposed building does not change the substance ol the approved futurc plan nor the cunent derrelopment plan. The size, location, and uses within the new building do not depart from the Intent of the ski base development plan or the purpose of fie zone district whidt states: 'The ski base recrealion disttict is intended to prwide for the base facilities necessary to operate a ski mountain and to allow multi-family residential dwellings as a secondary use if certain criteda are met. In addition. summer recreational uses and lacilities are encouraged to acfiieve multi-seasonal use of some of the facilities and prwide etficient use of the facilities." (18.39.010 - Purpqse) The Ski Base/Recreation Zone District is more closely associated with the Special Development District than any of the other zone districts in the Town ol Vail. The apprwed Development Plan for the Ski Basey'Recreation District, in conjunction with the design standards/criteria for evaluation, establish the requirements for development and uses for the property. IV. DESIGN STANDARDS/CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION The development plan for he Ski Base\Recreation Zone District shall meet each of the following strandards, or demonstrate that either one or more is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with public interest has been achieved: A. The developer will provide a buffer zone in ateas where the Ski Base\Recreation District boundary is adjacent to a rcridential use district boundary. The buffer zone must be kept lree of buildings or structures, and must be landscaped, screened to proEct it by natural ieatures so urat adverse effects on the surrounding ar€as ere minimized. This may rcquire a buffer zone of sufficient size to adequately separate the propGed use from the surrounding properties in terms of vicual privacy, noise, adequate light, air, air pollution, signage, and other comparable poEntially incompelible factor. The proposed new structure is to be located directly east of the existing tennis courb and approximately '150 feet south of Vail Valley Drive. Staff does not believe that this new building will impact the adjacent residential neighborhood. Staff also believes that the applicant has proposed adequate landscaping to replace the landscaping that will be removed. This landscaping includes two planters, and is shown on the attached site plan. Staff beliares that the neur fuilding will be screened adequately by the existing hrildings to the east and south, and by the proposed planters. B. The circulation 3yrtem decigned for the type of traffic generated, taking into coneideration, 3!f?ty, 3eparation from living area, convenience, accegs, noise, Ir o and exhaust controls. PrivaG intemd 3tr€ets may be permined if they can be used by police 8nd fire department vehicle3 for emergency purposes. Bicycle trettic ahlll be considered and provided when the sile is to be used for residcntial purposes. Section 18.52.100(Cg) of the Municipal Code stiates that the amount of required parking for recreationalfacilities (public and private) is to be determined by the PEC. The new building will contain restroom and employee locker room facilities that are accessory and incidential to the ski base area. The staff does acknowledge that the new employee locker rooms will probably bring more employees to this area. For this reason, the staff recommends that the odsting patking remain as guest parking and that the additional employees be required to car-pool or use lhe bus system to access the area. The new buiEing is to be located directly adjacent to an odsting parking area, and staff believes that police and fire department vehicles will have access to the structure in case of an emergency. Aside from his @ncem, statf believes thal the proposed structure will have no impact on the criteria listed above. Functional open Space in t6rms of: optimum preservation of natural features (including trees and drainage areas), recreation, views, convenience' and function. Although the applicant is proposing to remove two existing planters, they will be replaced by planters of fie same or of larger size. The applicant is proposing to replace the lanGcape materials that exist in the planters to be removed with species of comparable size in the new planters. ln terms of views, staff does not believe hat the proposed two story structure will negatively impact views since it is located between two existing buildings. Staff does believe that the proposed locker room and restroom facilities are being provided in response to the increased public demand for these facilities. The variety in terms ol housing type, densities, facilities' and open spaoe. Since the new building will be located on an area that is cunently covered by asphalt, and since housing is not proposed, the staft believes hat the applicant's request will have no impact on he criterion listed above. Privacy in terms of the needs of: individuals, families, and neighbors. Since the proposed structure is localed between two buildings, the tennis coults, and a parking area, the staff believes that the applicant's request will have no impacl on lhe critedon listed above. Pedestrian trdfic in terms of eafety, reparation, conrrenience' acoess to points of destination and attractiveness. c. D. E. F. H. o Staff believes that the pedestrian circulation system that is being proposed ,riff aduaify improve the situation at Golden Peak. The applicant has designed exterior staia that will provide more direct a@ess to the ski mountain, which will be more convenient to the users of the buildings In the complex. Staff believes hat the new building is compatible with the existing slructrres, and is attrac{ive in appearance. Staff does not believe that the proposed building will have an adverse impact on any safety issues. Further, statf believes that the new building does not conflict with any pedestrian tratfic and is sited conveniently b€twe€n the facilities at Golden Peak. Building type in terms of eppropridcno$ to density, site l?ldaonship and bulk. Staff believes that the proposed building is appropriate in terms ol density, site relationship and fulk. The proposed building has a footprint of approximately 992 square teet, is approximately 1984 square feet in area, and is 24 feet in height. Staff belierres hat the new tuilding would be in scale with the adjacent two buildings, urhich have heights of 36 feet (east building) and24 feet (soutr building). Staff also bellerres that the architecture and materials will be compatible with the existing strustures. Landscaping of the total 3ib In isrms of: purposea, types, mainienance, suitability, and affect on the neighborhood. Section 18.39.210 (Landscaping) states that "all areas within the area(s) of disturbance in the landscape plan not ocorpied by building, ground level decks or patios, or parking shall be landscaped." As pad of this proposal, the applicant is proposing to remove two existing planters that are in the general area of where the new buiEing is to be constructed. The plantea, although relatively small in area, prwide much needed grcenery for the site. One of these odsting planters is appro<imately 135 square feel in area, and contiains a 12" caliper dogwood, a 6" caliper aspen, and two 4" caliper aspens. The other planter, approximately 95 square feet in area, cunentfy contains one 4" caliper aspen and two large honeysuckle shrubs. The applicant is proposing to replace both of these planters with new planters of equal or greater area, and all of the existing trees and shrubs are proposed to be replanted in the new planters. Please note that staff has reviewed the existing landscape proposal with Todd Oppenheimet the town's landscape architect. Todd is of the opinion that the existing root system of the dogwood tree in he large planter is too extensive to allow it to be transplanted. Also, he is not be sure that he aspen trees nor the honeysud<le shrubs that are proposed to be tEnsplanted will suruive. The staff is requesting that any approvals given to this project be conditioned on the trees and shrubs surviving two growing seasons or that they be rcplaced with species of similar size (or combination thereof). Therefore, the following is a suggestion as to how these trees/shrubs should be replaced: to replace lhe 12f caliper dogwood - he applicant should provide four 3" caliper tr€€s; to replace tie 6" caliper aspen - the applicant should prwic|e two 3" caliper aspens; to replace the Large Plantec o It lwo 4" caliper aspens - the applicant should provide four 2" or three 3" caliper aspens. Small Planter: to replace the 4" caliper aspen - the applicant should provide two 2.5" caliper aspens; lo replace the two large honeysuckle shrubs - the applicant should provide one or two 6' evergreens and/or honeysuckle shrubs. Also, the attached site/lanGcape plan shows be new large planter to be approximately 350 square feet in area. Staff recommends that this planter could be enlarged an additional 5 to 10 feet to the north to accommodate the replacement landscaping. The intent of this suggestion is to create a landscape area that will positively impact the area. V. STAFF RECOMMENDANON Staff recommends approval of the request to amend the development plan at Gold Peak Ski Base to allow the proposed building that will accommodate locker room and restroom facilities. The staff believes that this application meets the Design Standards/Cdteria for Evaluation discussed in Section lV of this memorandum. As discussed above, the staff is requesting that any approvals given to this project be- conditioned on the trees and shrubs surviving two growing seasons or that they be replaced with species of similar size (or combination thereof). Therefore, the following is a suggestion - as to how these trees/shrubs should be replaced: Large Planter: to replace the 12" caliper dogwood - the applicant should provide four 3" caliper trees; to replace the 6" caliper aspen - the applicant should provide two 3" caliper aspens; to replace the two 4" caliper aspens - the applicant should provide four 2" or three 3" caliper aspens. Small Planter: to replace the 4" caliper aspen - the applicant should provide two 2.5" caliper aspens; to replace the two large honeysuckle shrubs - the applicant should provide one or two 6' evergreens and/or honeysuckle shrubs. Also, the attached site/landscape plan shows the new large planter to be approximately 350 square feet in area. Staff recommends that this planter could be enlarged an additional 5 to 10 feet to the north to accommodate the replacement landscaping. The intent of this suggestion is to create a landscape area that will positively impact the area. Also, the staff is investigating as to whether or not there is currently an easement to the Town of Vail lor the existing bike path that traverses the southem portion of the subject property. lf research finds that here is not an easement, the town would like to have a bike path easement granted and would recommend that this be a condition of approval also. c :pec\m€mosvagoldpkT26 :-*,"$?.: j-4. : {i: 1i i:.' .,i:.' . iis nra : -Y'-:itt i.,.a ':ri.#l :. t:? r'1'.'iij :. i i'.-ll " ;.'. i^ ': ;';-,i4'itii -':,'i ,{. '.,:., . I ri i,.."- ,1,i, .tr j :s \i"g-,iji$$ s, sz+Li /.t fi. ..t :|) r:-ra:{. -ii ll tt h$il\ lEi [ri i$r ( ....-- -tir- , t$ zx. F4a9. ,fztrl-@rJqri flrlil . @ ntaaetz ?J+]fEP l,.l^r-r: Ajqtv. W? (Vt4itr\. ' I ' ' ,.,,,,.,'. ,.:... .:. l;:.llt^:l,i:i.lli]jI : ,,' r,r. ;."1 :....i..t, t,..t,;,,ij1 .r,:.tl;r1i;.:,'g ,t o*" 0"rc^rro' J ronr or'*ro, DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: DATE oF Dns ugntrNc: e;;'"";!,'j;:, uzggg:i / bV-'?t'r' tt*ttttl*t TEIS APPI.IC,f,IIOII T|IIJT'. NOI BE ACCEPIED t NTrL AI..L REoU!R!D tNtoniltlroN rs sItBr.trTTED***tl*rt** I.PROJECT INFOR}4ATION: A. DESCRIPTION: .Fl TYPE OF REVIEW: Neh, Construction ($200.00)Minof Afteration. (920.00) F.LOT AREA: If required, stamped survey showing G.NAI.,IE OF APPLICANT:Mailin NA},IE OFMailing APPLICAI.IT' Address:_ H. I. , - )rsrclrAtuRE(sli,--#Mailing addreeb:l NA},IE OF OWNERS: INIU. BE X aooition ($5o.oo)Conceptua] Review ($0) C. ADDRESS: D. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:W Btock Subdivision ff property ls described by a meets and bounds legaldescription, please provide on a separate sheet and att.ach to this application. zoNING , O [a? ,t. C<indominium Approval lf applicable. K, DRB FEE: DRB feesr as shown above, are to be paid atthe tine of subnittal of DRB application. Later, wben applying for grbutldlng permit, please ldentify. the accurate valuation of the proposal. lhe Town of Vail .wiII adjust,the fee according to the table below, lo , ,tln! ; ";"i ;!. "Ii:i" iE=r;-i; ;;i o : "_:_ =_ : : - - ^- =;; b. - / (;to6 b 6{L / nMl' * DESIGN REi\tIEtf BOARD,IIPPROVI! E)@IRES ONE IEAR trlER FINAL APPSOIIAIr UNLESS A BUILDING PERIIIT I8 ISSIIED AltD CONSTRUCIION STTRTED. *TNO APPI.ICAIION a FEE SCFEDVLE: VA],UATION$ o-$'101000.9 10,001 - s ,,.50,000$50,001 -$ 1501000 $150,001 - $ 5001000 $500,001 - $1r 000,000$ over $1r 0001 000 EEE I $ 20.00 $ s0.00 $100.00 $200.00 $400.00 s500 .00 PROCESSED WITEOUT OT{NER'S SIGNATI'8E L applicant must provide a currentIot area. ENIATIVE: / .1 . .,r!_tt NA}IE 0F PRO,fECT: o SUBDIVISIONLEGAI, DESCRIPTION: STREET ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF PRO-IECT: fteu.. 7u,ri" The following informatlon is Review Board before a final A. BUILDING MATERIAIS: Roof Siding Other wall Mat,eriaLs Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Ralls FIues Flashings Chinneys Trash EncLosures Greenhouses Oth6r LANDSCAPING: Name required for submittal to the Design approval can be given: TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR Ftru,- . , t,. fu'[ttre"# &,teT tnnttt .. linr+;\ I I r/ y (',r'1.-, ,t,". ll / X F/r::-tl B.of Designer: Phone: PLAIIT I.'IATERTA!S;,-, Pg!-@. comnon Name ouantitv Size* PROPOSED TREES ' ,' lj . EXISTING TREES TO' ': BE REMOVED declduous trees.Minimum caliper for height. for coniferousIndicate .. PLAlilT MATERIT: 'Botahical Nane .o**oR"*" PROPOSED ,:_ EXISTING SHRUBS TO BE REMOVED h *Indicate size 5 qalLon. GROUND COVERS s0D SEED TYPE OF IRRIGATION TYPE OR EROSION ouantitv Size* \.: Minimum size of shrubs is Sguare Footaqe o&l'EJ-,;ttvr"es and I'ocations on a separate ly,each fixture from the lighting plan rovlde the wattage, height above ES (retaining walls, fences' ipecif,y. Indicate heights of swJ.mm:-ngretainlng lt",iof. waL:.s within the front setback is 6. oo lo Datton witliams seconded this motion and a 4-0 uot" "pprouJllt"Hr".$ 0 P V A request to amend the development plan for the Golden Peak Base to allow a building for public restrooms and employee locker rooms located at Tract F, Vail Village Sth Filing/458 Vail Valley Drive. Applicant: Planner: Vail Associates, lnc., represented by Tim Kehoe Tim Devlin Tim Devlin made a presentation per the staff memo. He said that Public WorK is investigating whether the Town ol Vail has a bikepath easement through the southem part of the aite. He stated that staff was recommending approval of this request to amend the development plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base Area per the staff memo with the suggestion conceming how the trees/shrubs should be replaced, and that they should survive more than two growing seasons or be replaced. Tim then read a letter which he received from Jim Lamont (East Vail Homeowners Association) to the PEC members addressing the concerns that the Homeowners Association has regarding this proposal. Jack Hunn stated that he believed that Vail Associates had granted the Town of Vail an easement for the bikepath at the southem part of the site. Dalton Williams stated that he was concemed with safety and that he would like to see snowmelting in the asphalt area between the new and existing buildings. He stated that this could create hazards on the site. Dalton stated that he would like to see the redevelopment completed property. He would like to see public safety and public welfare issues addressed, and that doing a Site "piecemeal" development was a concern to him. He wanted to allow for access to the tennis courts around the west planter Jack Hunn stated that the redevelopment of ihe Golden Peak Ski Base would not occur this year but that they were looking at it seriously for future years. Jack Hunn stated that ne fen tne revised development plan they were proposing would reduce the amount of traffic in this area. Bill Pierce, architect for the project, stated that he had consulted with Ted Rysack and that he had said that bobcats could help control snowmelt concerns. Diana Donovan stated that a small cluster of trees should be added by the stairs leading to the tennis courls. She said that lhe doors on the trash area were positive. She said that it was her feeling that parking needed to be more thoroughly addressed. Bill Pierce stated that parking is assigned at Golden Peak and there are seventy persons who have lockers in the lift operators locker room' Jack Hunn stated that there would be few additional employees as a result of this request. Planning and Envkonmental Commission July 26, 1993 15 oo He said that they do not feel that they are adding a significant amount of employees that would warrant increasing the on-site parking. He emphasized that this was a temporary solution and that in the future they were hoping to propose parking that would enable more effective skier droP-off. Diana Donovan stated that if a bobcat is used for snow, that the asphalt needs to be leveled out. Kathy Langenwalter stated that the planter needs to be brought further away from the fence and lennis courts so that access and circulation are not etfected. She would like to see the asphalt between the existing and proposed buildings removed so that landscaping could be placed in this area. Diana Donovan stated that she was concemed that people might drop their possessions through the grate on the upper level. Jack Hunn stated that this area would be used mainly by Vail Associates Ski School employees, and that the holes in the grate were relatively small. Dalton Williams stated that he felt uncomfortable with this request without snowmelting in the asphalt area between the buildings. Jack Hunn stated that they have always strived to maintain a safe environment and that ultimately the liability of any accidents rests with Vail Associates. Also, it is certainly in Vail Associates best interest to keep the area safe. Kathy Langenwalter slated that the DRB should look closely at this area and devise a sotution w1h tandscaping and circulation. Kathy stated that the asphalt would need to be removed and the new design should address safety and appearance. Diana Donovan made a motion per the staff memo for approval of this request to amend the development plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base Area to allow a building for public restrooms and employee locker rooms, with the recommendation to the DRB that they look at the safety and aesthetic concerns regarding this request. Greg Amsden seconded this motion and a 4-0 vote approved this request. 7. A request for a minor exterior alteration to allow an expansion to a residential unit at the Red Lion/Lots E, F, G and H, Block 5-A, VailVillage 1st Filing/3O4 Bridge street. Applicant: Aagje Nourse Plannen Jim Curnufte Dalton Williams made a motion per the statf memo to approve this request for a minor exterior alteration to allow for an 11 square foot expansion to a residential unit at the Red Lion with Greg Amsden seconding the request. A 4-0 vote approved this request. Planning and Envkonmenlal Commission July 26, 1993 16 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: .luly 26, 1993 SUBJECT:' A request to amend lhe development plan lor the Golden Peak Ski Base Area to allow a building for restrooms and locker rooms located at Tract F, Vail Village Sth Filing/458 Vail Valley Drive. Applicant: Planner: Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Tim Kehoe Tim Devlin I. BACKGROUND On DecemberT, 1983, Ordinance No.45, Series of 1983 imposed the SkiBase\Flecreation Zone District on this site. Vail Associates, Inc., has submitted an application to amend the Development Plan of the Ski Base\Recreation Zone District, in order to allow the construction of a new two story building-that will accommodate locker room and restroom facilities. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST Vail Associates, Inc. is proposing to construct a new two story building that will accommodate reslroom facilities on the upper level and locker room facilities on the lower level. The new building will be directly to the east of the existing tennis courts at Golden Peak, and directly north of the existing two story ski school building. The new building will have a total area of approximately 1984 square feet, with approximately 992 square feet on each of the two levels. The proposed building will match the existing structures in materials and color (i.e. cedar siding, stucco, built-up roof). The new building is proposed to be connected to the ski school building on the south by a second level metal grate walkway that will allow for circulation between the two buildings. Please see the attached site plan. As part of this proposal, the applicant is proposing to remove two existing railroad-tie planters that are in the general area of where the new building is to be constructed. One of these existing planters is approximately 135 square feet in area, and contains a 12" caliper dogwood, a 6" caliper aspen, and two 4" caliper aspens. The other planter, approximately 95 square feet in area, currently contains one 4" caliper aspen and two large honeysuckle shrubs. The applicant is proposing to replace both of these plantec with new planters of equal or greater area, and all of the existing trees and shrubs are proposed to be replanted in the new planters. Please reference the attached site plan for a better understanding of this description. III. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS Ski lockerVemployee locker rooms are a permitted use within the main building, according to the approved Development Plan in the Ski Base/Recreation Zone District. Staff considers the public restrooms to be an accessory use that is incidental to the ski base area. An amendment to the Development Plan is required in order to allow the construction of this new building. lt is the staff's opinion that the proposed building does not change the substance of the approved future plan nor the current development plan. The size, location, and uses within the new building do not depart from the intent of the ski base development plan or the purpose of the zone district which states: "The ski base recreation district is intended to provide for the base facilities necessary to operate a'ski mountain and to allow multi-family residential dwellings as a secondary use if certain criteria are met. In addition, summer recrealional uses and facilities are encouraged to achieve multi-seasonal use of some of the facilities and provide efficient use of the facilities." (18.39.010 - Purpose) The Ski Base/Recreation Zone District is more closely associated with the Special Development District than any of the other zone districts in the Town of Vail. The approved Development Plan for the Ski Base/Recreation District, in conjunction with the design standards/criteria for evaluation, establish the requirements for development and uses for the property. IV. DESIGN STANDARDS/CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION The development plan for the Ski Base\Recreation Zone District shall meet each of the following stiandards, or demonstrate that either one or more is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with public interest has been achieved: A. The developer will provide a buffer zone in areas where the Ski Base\Recreation District boundary is adjacent to a residential use district boundary. The buffer zone must be kept free of buildings or structures, and must be landscaped, screened to protect it by natural features so that adverse effects on the surrounding areas are minimized. This may require a buffer zone of sufficient size to adequately separate the proposed use from the surrounding properties in terms of visual privacy, noise, adequate light, air, air pollution, signage, and other comparable potentially incompatible factors. The proposed new structure is to be located directly east of the existing tennis courts and approximately 150 feet south of Vail Valley Drive. Staff does not believe that this new building will impact the adjacent residential neighborhood. Staff also believes that the applicant has proposed adequate landscaping to replace the landscaping that will be removed. This landscaping includes two planters, and is shown on the attached site plan. Staff believes that the new building will be screened adequately by the existing buildings to the east and south, and by the proposed planters. B. The circulation system designed for the type of traffic generated, taking into consideration, safety, separation from living area, convenience, access, noise, c. and exhaust controls. Private internal streets may be permitted if they can be used by police and fire department vehicles for emergency purposes. Bicycle traffic shall be considered and provided when the site is to be used for residential purposes. Section 18.52.100(CB) of the Municipal Code states that the amount of required parking for recreational facilities (public and private) is to be determined by the PEC. The new building will contain restroom and employee locker room facilities that are accessory and incidentalto the skibase area. The staff does acknowledge that the new employee lock:- '^^-.^ "'irr p::ltl';'*-l:3 .^:': ::;':'.,'::: l: ilis area. Forthis reason, the staff recommends that the existing parking remain as guest parking and that the additional employees be required to car-pool or use the bus system to access the area. The new building is to be located directly adjacent to an existing parking area, and staff believes that police and fire department vehicles will have access to the structure in case of an emergenry. Aside from this concern, staff believes that the proposed structure will have no impact on the criteria listed above. Functional open space in terms of: optimum preservation of natural features (including trees and drainage areas), recreation, views, convenience, and function. Although the applicant is proposing to remove two existing planters, they will be replaced by planters of the same or of larger size. The applicant is proposing to replace the landscape materials that exist in the planters to be removed with species of comparable size in the new planters. ln terms of views, staff does not believe that the proposed two story structure will negatively impact views since it is localed between two existing buildings. Staff does believe that the proposed locker room and restroom facilities are being provided in response to the increased public demand for these facilities. The variety in terms of housing type, densities, facilities, and open space. Since the new building will be located on an area that is curently covered by asphalt, and since housing is not proposed, lhe staff believes that the applicant's request will have no impact on the criterion listed above. Privacy in terms ol the needs of: individuals, families, and neighbors. Since the proposed structure is located between two buildings, the tennis courts, and a parking area, the staff believes that the applicant's request will have no impact on the criterion listed above. Pedestrian traffic in terms of safety, separation, convenience, access to points of destination and attractiveness. D. E. F. G. Staff believes that the pedestrian circulation system that is being proposed will actually improve the situation at Golden Peak. The applicant has designed exterior stairs that will provide more direct access to the ski mountain, which will be more convenient to the users of the buildings in the complex. Staff believes that the new building is compatible with the existing structures, and is attractive in appearance. Staff does not believe that the proposed building will have an adverse impact on any safety issues. Further, staff believes that the new building does not conflict with any pedestrian traffic and is sited conveniently between the facilities at Golden Peak. Building type in terms of appropriateness to density, site relationship and bulk. Staff believes that the proposed building is appropriate in terms of density, site relationship and bulk. The proposed building has a footprint of approximately 992 square feet, is approximately 1984 square feet in area, and is 24 feet in height. Staff heliprrps that thc ncrrrr hrrildinn urnrrld he in scale with the adjacent two buildings, which ,r^..^ r...\;^lar^ ^f oe r^^r /^^^+ r.,,:rri,tg) and24 feet (south building). staff also believes that the architecture and materials will be compatible with the existing struclures. Landscaping of the total site in terms of: purposes, types, maintenance, suitability, and affect on the neighborhood. Section 18.39.210 (Landscaping) states that "all areas within the area(s) of disturbance in the landscape plan not occupied by building, ground level decks or patios, or parking shall be landscaped," As part of this proposal, the applicant is proposing to remove two existing planters that are in the general area of where the new building is to be constructed. The planters, although relatively small in area, provide much needed greenery for the site. One of these existing planters is approximately 135 square feet in area, and contains a 12" caliper dogwood, a 6" caliper aspen, and two 4" caliper aspens. The other planter, approximately 95 square feet in area, currently contains one 4" caliper aspen and two large honeysuckle shrubs. The applicant is proposing to replace both of these planters with new planters of equal or greater area, and all of the existing trees and shrubs are proposed to be replanted in the new planters. Please note that staff has reviewed the existing landscape proposal with Todd Oppenheimer, the town's landscape architect. Todd is of the opinion that the existing root system of the dogwood tree in the large planter is too extensive to allow it to be transplanted. Also, he is not be sure that the aspen trees nor the honeysuckle shrubs that are proposed to be transplanted will survive. The staff is requesting that any approvals given to this project be conditioned on the trees and shrubs surviving two growing seasons or that they be replaced with species of similar size (or combination thereof). Therefore, the following is a suggestion as to how these trees/shrubs should be replaced: to replace the 12" caliper dogwood - the applicant should provide four 3" caliper trees; to replace the 6" caliper aspen - the applicant should provide two 3" caliper aspens; to replace the t-J Large Planter: Small Planter: two 4" caliper aspens - the applicant should provide four 2" or three 3" caliper aspens. to replace the 4" caliper aspen - the applicant should provide two 2.5" caliper aspens; to replace the two large honeysuckle shrubs - the applicant should provide one or two 6' evergreens and/or honeysuckle shrubs. Also, the attached site/landscape plan shows the new large planter to be approximately 350 square feet in area. Staff recommends that this planter could be enlarged an additional 5 to 'l0 feet to the north to accommodate the replacement landscaping. The intent of this suggestion is to create a landscape area that will positively impact the area. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staft recommends approval of the request to amend the development plan at Gold Peak Ski Base to allow the proposed building that will accommodate locker room and restroom facilities. The staff believes that this application meets the Design Standards/Criteria for Evaluation discussed in Section lV of this memorandum. As discussed above, the staff is requesting that any approvals given to this project be conditioned on the trees and shrubs surviving two growing seasons or that they be replaced with species of similar size (or combination thereof). Therefore, the following is a suggestion as to how these trees/shrubs should be replaced: Large Planter: Small Planter: to replace the 12" caliper dogwood - the applicant should provide four 3" caliper trees; to replace the 6" caliper aspen - the applicant should provide two 3" caliper aspens; to replace the two 4" caliper aspens - the applicant should provide four 2" or three 3" caliper aspens. to replace the 4" caliper aspen - the applicant should provide two 2.5" caliper aspens; to replace the two large honeysuckle shrubs - the applicant should provide one or two 6' evergreens and/or honeysuckle shrubs. Also, the attached site/landscape plan shows the new large planter to be approximately 350 square feet in area. Staff recommends that this planter could be enlarged an additional 5 to 10 feet to the north to accommodate the replacement landscaping. The intent of this suggestion is to create a landscape area that will positively impact the area. Also, the staff is investigating as to whether or not there is currently an easement to the Town of Vail for the existing bike path that traverses the southern portion of the subject properly. lf research finds that there is not an easement, the town would like to have a bike path easement granted and would recommend that this be a condition of approval also. c:pec\m emosVagoldpk.T26 ,? ,.1 s {z+s3 .i: r',j f ri. a*.' 'r r':jrl. rT:. ,i.i-.t|. iii.:rrr, -- --1.,.--l.l L\,t llrrll.,, \l;',,1 ,k$.!t- : dr1,rrJii( r ;h -1 c +-{ E$i IU* -.. !J; S-J Rsoi\J\ 12 \993 THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTTCE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on July 26, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. Consideration of: 1. A clarification of the subdivision process regarding payment of taxes. Planner: Mike Mollica 2. A request for a minor amendment to SDD #4, Cascade Village for the Waterford parcels in area A, described as follows: Thst F.4 ol rhc SW 'tl,{ N€ 1A. S€cdon 12, To}vnshlp 5 Souih. Rang€ 8r W6t ol lh€ Slxth Prlnclpej Moddls^, Torvn of V8,l Ea9l€ Counry. CrloEdo. d€scdb.d ss tollorvc: BcClnnlne at r polnt oo the eouhedt dght.ot-way line ot hlerslltc thhway No. 70 whence an lroo pln wlft a daslic caP na*ine lha canbr ot said Seclbn t2 bars S 33"10tf W 14,t7.03 f€€t; henc€ alone sald eourherly dehlrl-way line two cours6 tl N 52"5O2f E 229.66 toet 2) N 7a381f E t6O.7O bet rhenoa deF ring sstd sourh€dy riehtd.wsy lne N 88.455f E t38.93 leet: thenc. S 4f45'14'W 9a.32 te.t lh.nce S 'l8! lE36i W 5a.08 feeli thoncr S 0l'2136. W 2O5.O2 tcat; henc. S i 2:o73f W tlO.25 teef lhsnc. S 28"2836'W 161.18 te€t: $.nc. N 40'lfoa'W 2t l.16 t€€ti thonc. N 49'4255' E 97.80 tect: thenc. N 3fo931'W 95.59 fert; thenc. S 5f5O'29'W 55.'lO t€et: hance 69.4t t€ot rlong th€ arc ol a non- lar9ont cuwe b the bi hsving a ladius ot 65-@ t€et e c€nt|8t .nglo ot 61'la?f 8nd a chod thal beas N 58' 55'5S W 56.22 leeq thenca N 3?Slt'Wf 18,50t otToTha True Polnt ol B€glnnlng. Counly ot Eagle. Slslc of Color.do; Applicant: MECM Enterprises represented by Eustaquio Cortina and Commercial Federal Savings.Planner: Shelly Mello 3. A request for a minor exterior alteration to allow an expansion to a residential unit at the Red Uon/Lots E, F, G and H, Block 5-A, Vail Village 1st Filing/304 Bridge Street. Applicant: Aagje NoursePlanner: Jim Curnutte 4. A request for a modification to the conditional use for lhe snow dump lo allow an expansion of lhe road located at 1309 Vail Valley Drive/an unplatted parcel located west of the Town of Vail shops. Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Andy Knudtsen 5. A request for a variance to allow a deck to encroach inlo a setback for a residence localed at Lot 14, Bighorn 2nd Filing/3876 Lupine Drive. Applicants: Eric and Susan SipfPlanner: Andy Knudtsen w A request to amend the development plan for the Gold Peak Base to allow a building for restrooms and locker rooms located at Tract F, Vail Village 5th Filing/458 Vail Valley Drive. Applicant: Vail Associatcs, lnc., represented by Tim Kehoe Planner: Tim Devlin 7. A request for a tolnt worksesslon with the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board for the establishment of a Special Development District to allow the expansion of the Vail Athletic Club, located at 352 East Meadow Drive, and more specifically described as follows: A parcel of land in Tract B, Vail Village, First Filing, To,vn ol Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, mote parlicularly described as follows: Comm€ncing at the Nonheast corner of said Tracl B; lhenc€ N 79'46'00'W along lhs Nottherly line of Vail Village, First Filing, and along the Nonhorly line of said Ttacl B 622.86 fe€l; th€nce S 0626'52'W a disrarce of 348.83 fe€t lo the Soulhw€st corner of lhat patcel of land described In Book 19.| at Page .|39 as recorded January 10, 1966 and liled in Receptlon No. 102978 in the Eagle County Recotds, said corn€r also belng th€ True Polnt ol Beglnnlng; thencE S 79oO{'08' E and along lhe Southetly llne ol said parcel 200.00 leEt to lho Sourheast corner thereof; thence N 62'52'00' E and along the North€rly line of that parcel of land described ln Bcr,k ?22 at Pag€ 513 as recorded ln 1971 in the Eagle Cotnry Records, a distance ol 66.78 teel to the Northeasterly cornsr of sald parcel of land; said corner belrp on the W€sterly dghtof-way line of Gore Creek Road, as planed In Vail Village, Fitth Filing; thsncs N 27'13'37'W a dislarce ol77.37 teel along said W€sterty dght-ot-way line of Gore Creek Road; thence N 89'29'22'W a dislance of 12.80 fe€t to the North€asterly corner ol lhal parcol of land describ€d in Book 19't. Page 139 as recoded January .|0, i966 and liled in Receptlon No. 102978 In the Eagle County Records; thEnce Northwesterly 26.5'l feet along the arc of a 37.50 leet radius curve to lhe lett having a cenlral angle of 40'30'00' whose chotd bears N 53o40'OO' W a distance of 25.96 teel ro a polnt of langercy; lhence N 73o55'00' W and abng said tangent i 66.44 feet; thence N 85.10'21' W a dislarre of 50.40 fe€t lo rho Northwesterly corner of the ^ runlain Haus Parc6l; thenc€ S 0f18'0O'W and along the easterly line of said l*runlaln Haus Parcel a distance of 1oo.m feet lo the Sourheasterly corner thereot; thenc€ S 45'13'53' E a distance of 38.70 leEt to lhe True Point ol Beginning, contalnlng 30,486 square l6et, more or less. Applicant: VailAthletic Club Planner:Shelly Mello 8. A request for a major exlerior alteration to allow for a retail expansion at the Sunbird Lodge, located at 675 Uonshead Place/Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing. Applicant: Vail Associates, lnc. Planner:Tim Devlin 9. A request for the establishment of an SDD to allow the redevelopment of the Cornice Building and a request for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of three Type lV employee housing units, located at 362 Vail Valley Drive and more specifically described as follows: A part of Tracr'B' and a parl of Mill Creek Road, Vail Village, Fitst Filing, County of Eaglo, StalE of Colorado, more partictlarly described as lollows: ":Tl"*lT "l 'Ti:"T:i -'*: :' u:l :1n:",,,.T':' oo*i :l:*: "li:.]:'':::" 1':i il::' l!:, thence Soulh 10"14'00'West along the EastErly line of said Ttacl "B'; a dislance ot 198.31 fe€l lo lho Southeast€rly 6rn€r of sald Tract ;8'; thence North 79.46'00' West along the Southerly line of sald Tract 'B'a distanco of l OO.Oo f€€t to rhE true point of beginnlng thence Nonh 09'10'07'West a di$ance of 41.67 feet; lhence South 88.27'fi'Wesl a distanc€ of 75.21 fe€t; thEnce Soulh 27'13'37'East a dislanc€ of 7]7.37 teet; thenco Nonh 57.24'OO' East a distancE of 55.11 feer, morg or lEss to ih€ true point of beginnlng. Applicant: David SrnithPlanner: Jim Curnutte 10. A request for a conditional use permit and a landscape variance to allow an expansion of the Vail Associates vehicle maintenance shop located at the NW 1/4 NW 1/4 Seclion 7 and the SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 6, Township 5 South Range 80 W of the 60lh P.M.A/ail Associates. Applicant: VailAssociatesPlanner: Jim Curnutte Application D, ,' '{ a IECE?T- Thc Town of Vril ,o "1' N9 46666 LLARS $ / Jlr t. I i' rt. I !: ".1 'ali:ratU1!t ,-l 5 =(rrl norEl0' 1'l"'r rl i! c,l.tr'l Lnf') f $i H {tl E t. "t r::ir j.-1 lii :f., .:il, :1- :r 'll -i f-r rTlii, ,rt n rt i. i-i ii:r ,.:' r: rn |::l '-'-i rll '' rt l{ .- = :;l a-l . -Ir! i+ i+ i{'-i F. tl |:+ l-rrlr 1...1 S r:, lr1 l+ + ,:,J':F.!|:j-7. : . | -r 'jt u 4, f..-l ' 7 ::! ,:' F. - :tt Lrl+ il, ,', Cr. rt Fl r-tl,-r n a l.i- i.'r ,-t i.,lu.' | 'l ii '-!!?3:r {. ijr*rF ft'ir r"r :-f t.r-, -,, F:;N T EEi: Fi rr r-c a-l! = U g -lt..ll- r-r F.r F.-rLE,=mi-:- '=' 'A '=' -rJ11 ,:n 'ar ,9 [| ':, m '5 13' F. Er.' -T1 F ? m PLEASE MAKE TOWN OF VAJL D EPA RT;\{ENT OF COII;VITJNITY DEVELOP}IENT' S^LES ACTION TOR:\{ . 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, COLORADO 8L657 ZC|\T\G .d\D A DDRESS TiA'S0l q*110 4l J40 UMTOL\{BUILDI\G CODE UMFOR.V PLUTG[\IC CODE 0l ct\10 421t5 0t o)00{2415 0l 000042.il5 .l UMFoL\'t:lfEcHl}'lcLLcoDE UNIFOfu\' FIRE CODE0t 00c0 42{15 N,\TIONAL ELECTRJCAL CODE0l 0000 {2{ t5 oTltER coDE500Ks0t a?00.t2415 SLUE PRDfiS oIYLAR0t 0000.11543 >:ER,OX COPIES / STUDIE50l cw-tl {2112 0t 00co {2371 PENA I.TY FEES / RE.I.,..^'SPECTIONS ol o0c0{t332 i pL,r"t nr.vtErvRE.cHEcxFEE ts.(oFER }iR.l 0t mco 42323 OFF HOURS L\.SPECTION FEES CONTL\CTO RS LICL\S ES FEES0l 0000.{{12 SIGN APPL]CAT]ON FEE 0t 0000{1330 .0t 0000414r3 ADDITION^I. 5IGNAGE FI,E ISI.OO PFR SO.I;T. lTC ART PRO'ECT DONATJON 0t cn004l{t3 0l 00001?.rr0 0t 0000.tt33t PRE PiJD DESICN RE\INV IOARD FEE 0t 000042412 BUILDING-CONSTRUCTION PERMIT COMPUTER DI IO1O TAX 01 0000 42371 rNvEsTrGATroN FEE (BUTLDTNG) I rorAl ous, 0r 0000 .il 330 0t 00004t3 0l 0m0!l:lio rsPECLAL D 0l 0000 4 t3 0l 0000{t530 ;vA 0l 0)00 .r 1330 | zoMNo coDE * * * * * * * * * PLEASE MAKE TOWN OF VAIL DEPA RT;\{E}iT OF COM:VITJNITY DEVELOP}TENT . S.ILES ACTION FON},! SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD I'81657 li,tltE 0t 00004t540 ZC\T\G .fu\D ADDRESS [{APS 0t cs00424t5 IINTFOL\{ B UILDh*G COD E 0t 0000{24r5 UMFOR.\{ PLUVA L\''G CODE 0l 000042.il5 UM FOR}.I TTECHAh']CAL CODE 0l 00c0{2415 UNITOR,\{ FIRE CODE 0t 0000{2415 N,\TIONAL ELECTR'CAL CODE 0t 0000.{21t5 OTIIER CODE DI)OKS 0 t co00 .il 519 BLUE PRDITS OIYLA 0l 0000 {24 12 | >:raox copEs / s'tuDtEs 0r 00c04237t PENA I,TY FEES / RE.L..-'S PECT]ONS 0t 00c0{r332 PL,L\ REVIE1V RE.CHECK FLE IS,(O FER, HR. OFF I.:OURS NSPECTION FEES 0l co00.il{r2 CONT:L\ CTORS LICL\SES FEES 0t 0000{r330 SION APPLICAT'iON FEE.01 0000 414t3 0r 00004!4t3 ADDITION^L SICNAGE F'E ISI.OO PER SO.IT. 0l 00c€ 421.10 lTC ART FRO'ECT DONAT]ON 0t 0c004t33t PRE PAJD DESIGN REVIE1V BOARD FEE 0r 000042412 BUILDING-CONSTRUCTION PERMIT COMPUTER DI IOIO TAX 01 0000 42371 rNvEsTrGArroN rEE (BUTLDTNG) 0l 00004t330 ERIOR ALTIIRATION IIiORE THA"\ lCrO SO.F| 0l 00cndl3i0 rsPEcLA DISTRTCT llr u:.^OR Al\{ EVD 1000041330 lsuBDtvl * * * ttc * * * * * o Tt---|frlt-l fiF Ltl:l I t- 'rli=cel1;neoug f,ash ' il!ll;l:'il i:i_,r . r..l i.' :r,. :l , l:l-_' ' ' ,'''-. :.rl .L ,i -.'.- ., r :l . i1::'! !'[ L'Ft Ft-t- .ir r ri r';..rl', ' r':: I i[:tF ' tjtlt I terri !'3id gri'loun i Paid ,::.i:ir':ili':i "-:'ilir!r'i ;'i:lu' i:i* .-:" TH'1t-tti \-.rllJ GatFeri \-}-n<TbLe. Bt-vrta,s /r, U'S' fut-sr ?e. 9e* .fwrcruW) *tun2a tao Qlo. \lp-ic frt6+5 ?tc ,7 UWu+ Y-ra;-c Vn roT u$)z-e- 4 9^*ireriorr O4A fapa-sr papfi 7-1-?s '/ 'l , r/ s)'1, -lZ,-w ee Vpiu '7f Sas,rff Fn-ot'tt}4,o ?P. \l-T-sr Etcrz Anrrrr ; -Tin' D, ,Fn-N: Bri.r_ Q)eD Dyr-yr-,<r Iwqp+i?r@ AfffJv ', l"u*z;pr,l $ect 4tsverz+,t lvbwe-a a Tvaui tL-Dq> 3gO *a4tsaar Vtir-, 'trTTIio V.egnt [Zuoataul<o8:, _ I _ 6149r-l^* Ntmtx,ea. Qau-* *at 65 7 o T,)R*-s - ff-p-g L-Dqe C-oI\Do rnt tN't 9 fl^--r 4?, 5tE AVE. N e-r,-r Yafi+ i N.7, t oa r'7 /,: /rt ("L Pq1-1t I IJa*x d Dw+tz tJ^'ic- Vu-cgr-,*rion Pisrrr-'.cr #rrN: -lae )o. Fvt-a<eu.z (L,*v Eaar BA, psvE V*re , Ot 6r? M *+arz Vetr- Loqe lryrw r - , q ,' EArsr VettVntz1 ?o.'- 5 A"?F Nau'$'t V*i' 4 ta v+r u Vpu--? >lL. t\*ttt-4 tc'*^r V+iu ,t,r6t7 / /\alu C.) L^r"-s - f+-^^t Lo>qL Groayt'.(rurA A5> oC r , fl+-c-tz t<"re 11 uq=e AarN i Nafz-t,aA.fl (UW+ (O-u-9or.*'r Q+-^g,-Halo.r la+t- CArlT>at''A tvn hSY g lcTtl o Ceroaytc^-t.L,'{^^ A5> oC r f Ls-c-tz- r*tre 11 uwr + 4 7, Tg AVE, Ne-r--z ?ayz* / N.7, I AA I'7 ("L A<TN T t]ar+or d DeluL fra.trJ- rar*^t Fr-rN I Natz-t',!Ar1/ (UWe (ezsor.tr (La-^5,-l\a1ut L+q,E- (-e\ttDav.,t\tv>1 A,j.Y AT'N ] BI, PotlE jzrw r _ 5rrep- /c) / ,,t Upil -7ao VAi.e , M *+tarz 7qr' V*i' T,)Rx-s-*q-u L-Pqe <-O|\De nn rJ'!'r (/ f\Ji 4ta V+ru V*ur-? D4. V+iu ,fl a>t Q**'",t-s - ltanr I-o>qV-- Vz c rzar+ri o ru Pi srrrj.c r >o, Fvz-"*vez'z-.s (L*> Fa'sr ot 6,r'? V^,r-l-+.qz EA,-sr Va,tV*u*t ?e., - a l6ut Natrz$rr / to) /,, , ,/,rs o o 0?, 3 S* t Cuue V/"- f-a, EoY ;(V 0,+ie 6(6rZ n itt'YtNdS 'Y€-L ||atztZ- ffrrrr' l.a. f4a< ea Jasrt-'( l1'ez- rl I a-tVAte W'/ SESa ' ' +zo'%oe A-Tro{; Ef<rry 5i pp>+, l/ #*,,Q)Nett-n+ U.x/D= Gveouttt,v}r +t54. 6oa Vn,ie \l+-i-ea Ptz, V+ic gtteTg 176'37Co , A.,* 7v*sang Q"wn.,.,rvp. E>>c' fu'Q) 43+ 6oea Cr,g* 9a., VArr- g7t6T b ^@ry,,ffi:n *1:w# 4 L*sTs a'/"1'LT4-'-S na*irir(, | \.t IL r'' frl__ixe Sus I t9 t4 IS (, {7 t6 I7 r- 4 V y-t-.e<e l+r TP.$q 'e .A',/'-\).X- Vtri (aE It A o(tot-Qp',v ?uo u i. Vtsir, Vt*-e,e t €r 'len.€ Va-g,Qe,* Frctiq Lrt:rs o 4 ? /r/z,t3,t!r1 rc, r'J, ta, i7 ffi-# I S) | L4/&lrI,/-T Rr ,, p t+c-nDELg rrrp..., Po lq P7- L-r-t M. V5a7t ?g t ., Mp":... r'., %, @-7Pr- u)qtv ,:-\i'- '|i ' l?at.t-ar C ]R.Ht6aie (Goct. Opel;u\^/t4< 5+ S.r,ic Ztoo De"n vvLl C-.a QO?zL l&-r\n* L. 9a*u | 6 oo . . .}tt'c+<> r/'>Y- Dt-tuvvL). C. 5vtt-.Aoe fioLoz- o / C-+-ra+zt-r-s F.tr.wrr. to- t 9to N- 5# Pl'lLrol,rx (Lr' l-p(E Farz_r->l tL, 6u+; .tV J--Df) 11'7 al ..9n"-n I b,/Q;'?$Jvr Ct-*t""ttrz-+rT' .9vceuz*\ Afi{a=N ra ) , S-nr- lAl-TX, TAkq ?o 9a* Q-o cts-Y t'1., C-418sffi4 gL+) Iaoe uT- N,C, - I 2'76 o.gtL34 {Lvt'zYvtt Q r',p*, /,*n u- Fo EF u- E @ LrJ(9 J J J s8-IEo -Fsz =<H> ftli9 --ill$l lls'lllfi [J' td N J ,Q\ ^r-o\J otrjFF Jo-zl s \ \gu t-.i1 A l-"J\JN>€\c -l ,s Q? [-FF tl F(n td E.ou- Jl<-2.oF z. t l-rJ E, .t!F :f = of'- UJF- F:a*E= H!z,E. Oz. om s LLo o ;@ 9o. :-6 .F g{ Fzfo.C' ItrFJ(0 lrJ F = g F (9zf L i F- lt,(9 J J l{, lrJ(9 JJ J42 z85e dE; l! Fo G, F. JJ J S-JST . *,o THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUB PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vailwill hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on July 26, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. In the Town of Vail Municipal Building. Consideration of: 1. A clarification of the subdivision process regarding payment of taxes. Planner: Mike Mollica 2. A request for a minor amendment to SDD #4, Cascade Village for the Waterford parcels in area A, described as follows: That Fn of the SW tt4 NE 1A, Section 12, Torynshtp 5 South, Range 6t W€st ol rho Slxrh Prlncipal M€ddlar\ To|fn ot V8ll, Eagl€ Counry. Colorado, d€scribe d sr lollowr: Beglnnlng rt a polnt on th. Gouierly righl{l-way line of Intersrat€ tlghwey No. 70 whonce a|l lron pln wllh a dasth c3p matftrng lhe conlg| ot Grld Secllon 12 b€a|s S 33P10'19 W t4,{7.03 leet; hence alono sald souherly rlght{t-way line $vo couls€s ll N 5250?f E 229.68 h€l 2l N 7438't r E 160.70 bsr; rhqrc. dcF nng sald southody ,tghr{l-way lne N 8S.455f E 138.93 leot 0l9nce S 4(,"45'14' W 91.32 t€et th€nce S l8' 183d W 54.08 le€l; rhc.rc. S ot'2t3d W 2o5.O2 f.it berEa S l ?o7f6. W tlO.25 bd; rhcncc S 28"28s'W 1o{.4E t€d: trnce N 40'ttiol'W 2t1.16 bsl th.ncaN49..t25ciE97.80to€q0rnc€N3rt'31'W95,59f3€Uth3ncoS5?5029W55.10tu€$tl€rc€69.48feet8h|!thaalcolenorF tangonl curve lo lhe l€tt havim a rad'5 ot 65,00 teot, a Godrat angle ot 6t'"tialf snd a clp.d hal be8ts N 5a' 55'53' W 56.2 lcat lh.nc. N 3f0911' W 116.50 bet To The Trur Polnl ot B€ghr ng. Coonly ot Er9le. Slalc of Crlorado; Applicant: MECM Enterprises represented by Eustaquio Cortina and Commercial Federal Savings.Planner: Shelly Mello 3. A request for a minor exterior alteration to allow an expansion lo a residential unit at the Red Lion/Lots E, F, G and H, Block 5-A, Vail Village 1st Filing/3O4 Bridge Street. Applicant: Aagje NoursePlanner: Jim Curnutte 4. A request for a modification to the conditional use for the snow dump to allow an expansion of the road located at 1309 Vail Valley Drive/an unplatted parcel located west of the Town of Vail shops. Appllcant: Town of VailPlanner: Andy Knudtsen 5. A request for a variance to allow a deck to encroach into a setback for a residence located at Lot 14, Bighorn 2nd Filing/38T6 Lupine Drive. Applicants: Eric and Susan SipfPlanner: Andy Knudtsen o #A request lo amend the development plan for the Gold Peak Base to allow a building for restrooms and locker rooms located at Tract F, Vail Village 5th Filing/458 Vail Valley Drive. Applicant: Vail Associates, lnc., represented by Tim Kehoe Planner: Tim Devlin 7. A request for a lolnt worksesslon with the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board for the establishment of a Special Development District to allow the expansion of the Vail Athletic Club, located at 352 East Meadow Drive, and more specifically described as follows: A parcel of land ln Tract B, Vail Village, First Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle County. Colotado, more parlicularly described as follows: CommsncJng al th€ Northeast mrner of sald Tract B; lhenc€ N 79"4600' W alorB the Nonherly llnE of Vail Village, First FilirE, ard along the Norlherly line ol said Tract B 622.86 teet; therrce S 06?6'52' W a distance of 348.83 f€et to the Southw€st corn€r of thal parc€l of land described ln Book ,|91 at Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1966 and liled in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records, sald corner also belng th€ True Point of Beginnlng; thenco S 79'04'08' E and alorE th€ Sltuthedy line of said parcol 200.00 l€et lo lhe SouthEast corner th€reof; thsnc€ N 62'52'00' E and along th€ Northorly line of that parcel of land described ln BooR 22 at Pag€ 513 as recorded In 1971 in lh€ Eagle County Records. a distance of 66.78 test to the Northeasterly corner of said parcel ol land; said corner being on lh6 W€sterly dghtol-way line of Gore Creek Road, as platted in Vail Village, Fitth Filing; therre N 27"1337'W a dislanco ot 77.37 leel along said W€sterly right-ot-way line of Gore Creek Road; thence N 89"29'22 W a dlslanc€ of 12.80 feet lo th€ North€asterly corner of that parc€l of land doscribEd ln Book 191, Page 139 as record€d January 10, 1966 and liled in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records; lhence Northw€sl€rly 26.51 fe€t along the arc of a 37.50 test radius curve lo the lEft having a central angle of 40'30'00'whose chotd bears N 53o40'0O W a distanc€ of 25.96 te€l to a point of tang€ncy; thenca N 73"55'00' W and along said tangent i 66.44 f€€l; rh€nc€ N 85"10'21' W a distance ot 50.40 te€t to tho Northwest€rly corner of the firountaln Haus Parcel; thence S 02:18'00'W and along the easl€rly llne of said lrountain Haus Parcel a dlstance ot 1OO.OO feEt to the Southeasterly corner thereof; thonc€ S 45''13'53' E a distanc€ ot 38.70 teet to tho True Point of B€glnnlng, conlalnlng 30,486 squate feet, more or less' Applicant: Vail Athletic Club Planner: ShellY Mello 8. A request for a major exterior alteration to allow for a retail expansion at the Sunbird Lodge, located at 675 Uonshead Place/Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Uonshead 3rd Filing. Applicant: VailAssociates, Inc. Planner:Tim Devlin 9. A request for the establishment of an SDD to allow the redevelopment of the Cornice Building and a request for a conditional use permit to allow the conslruction of three Type lV employee housing units, located at 362 Vail Valley Drive and more specifically described as follows: A part of Tract'B' and a part of Mill Creek Road, Vail Village, First Filing, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, mor€ partlcularly described as follows: Commenclng al the Northeast corner of Vail Village, Fifsl Filing; thence Norlh 7s'46'00'West along the lh€nco Sourh 10.14'00'West along the Easlerly line of said Tract'B'; a distance of 198.31 leot lo th€ o Southeaslerly corner of sald Tract 'B'; therrce North 79c46'0C W€st along the Southerly fine of said Tmcl 'B'a distarre ot 1oo.oo te€t to th6 tru€ polnt ot beglnnlng thence Nodh 09"10'07'West a distafre of 41.67 teet; th€nce South 88.27"11' West a distanc€ ot 75.21 teet; th€nce South 27"13'37' Easl a distarce of 77.37 leati thence Nonh n.24'OO'East a distance of 55.11 feet, mor€ or less to the tru€ pcfnt of bsginnlng. Applicant: David SmithPlanner: Jim Curnutte 10. A request for a conditional use permit and a landscape variance to allow an expansion of the VailAssociates vehicle maintenance shop located at the Nw 1l4Nw 114 Section 7 and the SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 6, Township 5 South Range 80 W of the 60th P.M.A/ail Associates. Applicant: VailAssociatesPlanner: Jim Curnutte ,, LAND titi"" cuARANTEEO""ItPANY Representing Title Insurance conpany of Minnesota THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER October OL' L992 our order No.: V19465-5 r,t Lr /("'/L BIIYER/OWNER: l. '!r- '- - BEAVER CREEK ASSOCIATES' INC., A COLORADO i\ ',,,l I CoRPoRATION (AS TO PARCELS 15, 18' 20 AIID 221 Tv BE.AVER CREEK HOTEL COUPANY' INC., A COLORADO coRPoRAlroN (As TO ttNrrs l'l-14 Ar{D U-17 PARCEL 33), AND VAIL ASSOCTATES, rNC., A COLORADO CORPORATTON (AS TO THE REX'{EINDER) SELLER: ADDRESS 3 VAIL ASSOCTATES LEGAL DEPT. P.O. BOX 7 vArL, co 81658 1 AttN: GERRY ARNOLD DAVIS, POLK & ARDEI,L 450 LEXINGTON AVE. NY, NY 10017 1 AttN: JN,TES P. MCINTYRE AL .C O I.T M I T IiI E N SCHEDI,'LE A our order No.v19 4 65-5 Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective datehereof vested in: BEAVER CREEK ASSOCIATES, INC., A18, 20 AND 22) sEAVSn CREEK HOTEL COI{PANY, INC., AND M-17 PARCEL 33), AND VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION (AS TO THE RH{AINDER) The land referred to in this Cornnitment is described as follows: PARCEL 1: TRACT E, VATIJ VILI.AGE, TIFTH FILTNG, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, COI'NTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO. (CHAIR 16) PARCEL 23 PARCEL 1, GOLDEN PEAK SKI BASE AND RECREATION DISTRICT PARCEL, ACCORDING TOTHE PLAT RECoRDED JANUARY 15' 1987 IN BooK 455 AT PAGE 934, cottNTY OF E.AGLE, STATE OF COLORADO. EXCEPTING THEREFROI,I, THE EXISTTNG LEASE PARCEL DESCRTBED AS FOLLOWS: A PART OT TR,ACT I' AND A PART OF GORE CREEK ROAD. CI'L-DE.SAC VAIL VTLI,AGEFIFTH FILING, COI'NTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, UORE PARTICUI,ARLY - DESCRIBED AS FOLIOWS: BEGINNING AT THE I'TOST WESTERTY CORNER OF TRACT F, SAID POINT BETNG ALSO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 19, BLOCK 1, VAIL VTLLAGE FIRST FILINGT. THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTIIWESTERTY LINE OF SAID TRAST F AND AIONG AcuRvE To THE RIGHT HAVTNG A RADTUS OF 161.92 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28 DEGREES 43 MTNUIES 00 SECONDS, AN ARC DTSTAIICE OF 81.15 FEET TO A pOrNT OF REVERSE cItRvEi THENCE Ar,oNG sArD NoRTHWESTERLY rJrNE AND ALoNG A cuRvE ToTHE LEFT HAVTNG A RADIUS OF 156.05 FEET, A CEIITR.AL ANGLE OF 03 DEGREES 11urNUTEs 13 sEcoNDs, AN ARc DTSTANCE oF 9.24 FEET To A PorNT oF TANGENT; THENCE AI,ONG SATD NORTIIWESTERIJY I,INE AND ALONG SATD TANGENT NoRTH44 DEGREES 58 MTNUTES 13 sEcoNDs EAST, 84.80 FEET To A PorNT oF CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHI{ESTERLY LINE AND AIONG A CI'RVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2O.OO FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 80 DEGREES 36 }IINIITES 13 SECONDS, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 28.14 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE ct'RvE; THENcE ALONG THE NORTITERLY LINE OF SAID TRAqT T AND AI.,,ONG A REVERSE CURVE lt,O TTIELEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 22s.OO F8ET, A CENTRAL N{cL8 OF 30 DEGREES 41 PAGE 2 oTA 4. coLoRADO CORPORATION (AS TO PARCELS 15, A COLORADO CORPOR.ATTON (AS TO UNrTS H-14 5. oTAAL COMI'TITUENT SCHEDT'T-,E A Our Order No. V19465-5 MINUTES 09 SECONDS, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 120.50 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENT; THENCE AI.,ONG SATD NORTHERLY LINE AND AIONG SAID TANGENT SOTITH 84 DEGREES 29 UINLIIES 09 SECONDS EAST 209.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 18 UINIIIES 42 SECONDS WEST , L96.09 FEET' THENCE NORTH 85 DEGREES 41 lIfiflIrES 18 SECONDS WEST, 277.t7 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSEeTION WITH THE SOIIIHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT Fi THENCE NORTH 13 DEGREES 50 l,tINUrES 18 SECoNDS WEST AND ALONG SArD SOUIIHI{ESTERLY LINE 51.52 FEET' THE}icE NORTH 70 DEGREES 30 MINUTES OO SECONDS WEST AND ATONG THE SOIIT}TWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRAST F 161.92 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, PARCEL 3: coNDoMINIW ttNIT l!-1, ONE VAIL PLAC8, ACCORDTNG TO THE CONDOI{rNrW MAP THEREOF RECORDED UAY 29, 1980 IN BOOK 303 AT PAGE 4O9 AND AS DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOI{rNrW DECI_,ARATTON RECORDED MiAy 29, 1980 rN BOOK 303 AT PAGE 4O7, couNTY oF EAGL8, STATE OF COLORADO. (VAIL VILLAGE TICKET OFFICS) PARCEI.T 4: A PARCEL OF r.AND THAT INCLUDES ALL OF r,OT 4, BIOCK 1, AND PARTS OF TRACT C AND TRACT D OF VAIL/LIONSHEAD FIRST FILING, A SI'BDIVISION RECORDED I'NDER RECEPTION N1IMBER t]-326O, IN BOOK 2L7 Ar pAcE 576, AND CORRECTTON OF pr.AT RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 1970 rN BOOK 218 Ar PAGE 9OO OF THE EAGLE COnNTy CLERK AND RECORDERS RECORDS, SAID PARCEL OF I.AND BEING I.IORE PARTICUI,ARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, VATL/LIONSHEAD FIRSTFILING, THENCE THE FOLLOWING THREE COI'RSES ALONG TH8 EAST BOIJNDARY OF SAID LOT 4; 1) SOUTH 4 DEGREES 35 !,!rNUTES 58 SECONDS EAST A DTSTANCE OF 59.15 FEET 2) SOUTH 85 DEGREES 24 DITNIIIES 02 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 12.06 FEET 3) SOUTH 4 DEGREES 35 I.IINIIIES 58 SECONDS BAST A DISTANCE Or 190.90 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; TEENCE CONTTNUING SOUTH 04 DEGREES 35 I.IINIIIES 58 SECONDS EAST FOR A DTSTANCE OF 102.81 FEET, ACROSS TRACT C, AND INTO TRACT D VAIL/LIONSHE.AD FIRST FILING; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 24 UTNUTES 02 SECONDS WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 187.21 FEET TTIROUGH SAID TRAST D AND ACROSS SAID TRACT C TO A POrNT ON THE WEST BOITNDARY OF TRACT C; fHENCE NORTH 12 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 23 SECONDS WEST AI,ONG THE WEST BOI'NDARY OF TRACT C FOR A DISTANCE OF 103.85 FEET TO THE SOUTH!{EST CORNER OF LOT4i THENCE THE FOLLOWING SEVEN COURSES AI,ONG THE I{EST AND NORTH BOT'NDARY OF LOT 4: (1) NORTH (2) NORtH DEGREES DEGREES MINIITES MINIITES OF2343L2SECONDS WEST A DISTAI{CE SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE 16.70 52.02 FEET PAGE 44 50 09 OF FEET ooALTA COI{MTTUENT SCHEDULE B-2 (Exceptions) Our Order No. V19465-5 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to thefollowing unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction ofthe Conpany: 1. Standard Exceptions 1 through 5 printed on the cover sheet. 6. Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special assessments not yet certified to the Treasurerrs office. 7. Any unpaid taxes or assessnents against said land. 8. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any. 9. UTILITY EASEI,IENT FIVE FEET TN WIDTH AIONG THE WESTERLY AI{D SOTIIHERLY LOT LINE AS SHOWN ON THE RECORDED PLAT OF VAIL VILI,AGE, FIETH FTLING. io. nrcnr oF pRopRrEToR oF A vErN oR LoDE To ExrRAqr AND RElfovE Hrs oRE THEREFROM SHOT'LD THE SAI'IE BE FOT.'ND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PRB,TISES. AS RESERVED fN IJNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED May 20, 1905, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 511. 11. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANAI.S CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNfTED STATES AS RESERVED IN IJNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED May 20, 1905, fN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 511. 12. RESTRTETTVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTATN A FORFETTURE OR REVERTER CI..AUSE, BUT OMITTING RESTRICTIONS, IF.AI.IY, BASED ON RACE, COI,OR, REI-,IGTON, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRIJUENT RECORDED Novemlrer 05, 1965,IN BOOK 187 AT PAGE 353 AND AS AI'IENDED IN INSTRUIIENT RECORDED Augrust 30,L97L' IN BOOK 22L AT PAGE 495 AND AS AI.{ENDED IN INSTRI'IIIENT RECORDED }.T.ARCH3, L977 IN BOOK 253 AT PAGE 48, AND AI'IENDMENT RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1984 IN BOOK 393 AT PAGE 492. 13. A PERPETUAI RrGHT AllD E.ASEilENT OF LIGHT, ArR, pROSpEqf, INGRESS Al{D EGRESS, UPON, OVER AND ACROSS SI'BJECT PROPERTY AS GRANTED TO CIIRISTIAI.IIA-AT-VAILINC. IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED JULY 10, 1963 IN BOOK 1?7 AT PAGE 127 AND AS DESCRTBED rN AGREEI-IENT RECORDED JrrNE 5, 1968 IN BOOK 212 AT PAGE 878. (ITEXi!S 9 TIIROUGH 13 AFFECT PARCEL 1) II. RTGHT OF PROPRTETOR OF A VEIN OR I,ODE TO EXTRAqT AND REITIOVE HTS ORE THEREFROI.T SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETR,ATE OR INTERSECT THE PRB{TS8S AS RESERVED IN IJNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED July 12, 1899, IN BOOK 4g AT PAGE 475 AND IN TNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED Uay 20, 1905, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 511. PAGE L7 AL oTA coMt{r?}IE NT Our Order No. V19465-5 SCHEDT'LE 8.2 (Exceptions) 15. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THEIINITED STATES AS RESERVED IN ITNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED July t2 , Lggg IfN BOOK 48' AT PAGE 475 AND RECORDED ttay 20, 1905, IN BOOK 48 AT eAGE 511. 16. TERI.IS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF LEASE I{TTH VAIL METROPOLTTAN RECREATIONDISTRICT RECORDED TBD IN BOOK 215 AT PAGE 296. 17. TASE,TENT AND RIGHT OT WAY FOR UIIJJ CREEX. 18. RESTR,ICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CI.,,AUSE, BUT oMITTTNG RESTRIeIIoNS, IF ANY, BASED oN RACE, coloR' RELIGToN, oR NATIONAL ORTGfN' AS CONTAINED IN fNSTRWENT RECORDED Decenber L7, 1965, IN BOOK 187 AT PAGE 515. 19. RESTRICTIVE. COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITT'RE OR RE'UERTER CI,AUSE, BUT OI.IITTTNG RESTRTqTTONS, IF ANY, BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, OR. NATIONAL ORIGIN, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRU{ENT RECORDED November 15, 1965, fN BOOK 187 AT PAGE 353. ?0. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS I{HICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CI,AUSE,BIrr oMTTTTNG RESTRICTIoNS, IF ANY, BASED oN RACE, coloR, REIJTGIoN, oR NATIONAL ORIGIN, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRWENT RECORDED January 15, 1987, IN BOOK 455 AT PAGE 933. 21. EASEI'IENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THE PI,ATOF GOLDEN PEAK SKI BASE AND RECREATION DISTRICT PARCEL RECORDED JANUARY 15,1987 IN BOOK 455 AT PAGE 934. (ITB.!S 14 THROUGH 21 AFFECT PARCEL 2) 22. RIGHI OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REX'!OV8 HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOT'LD THE SA},!E BE FOt'ND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREI,TISESAS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECoRDED July 13, L899, IN BooK 48 AT PAGE 475. 23. RIGHT OF I{AY FOR DITCHES OR CANAIJS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AIITHORITY OF THEIINITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECoRDED July 13 , LB9s,IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475. 24. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTATN A FORFEITI'RE OR RE|YERTER CIJIUSE,But OMITTING RESTRICT]oNS, rF Al{v, BASED oN RACE, COIJoR' RELIGToN, oR NATIONAL ORIGIN, AS CONTATNED IN INSTRWENT RECORDED August 10, 1962, IN BOOK 174 AT PAGE 179. PAGE 18 Vv.{. ,/l .(,*-_ / J "4-^ C.^ l,', I a INTEH-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT:rk,d,'fi/.-|"^u DATE SUBMITTED: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS NEEDED BY: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:c/l<-4./.-n<,c 1" ft,a_a VWa-'w L".r."- /---.L , s hV ^t ddz-/..^- PUBLIC WORKS 14 r:-'--r-o-'<-JReviewed by:Date: Comments: z'-z"uz , / ^.*' ,, ,.-+ it-T b._nl Sln -t ^./,tt , t/ P r.?_^) r b,y_, t/t'U ( L4),/ .'IruN''tr'/*. ..1 ( /"'- ,-" 7 ''r-o -1 ,r-,J ,c a,- l. , - 1rflJ tii..d I lr:Ym D 'st {, Pw 4 f{"'*l t3 al Retum to INTER.DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT:lk,./, 6r.-4"-^- DATE SUBMITTED: DATE OF PUBUC HEARING COMMENTS NEEDED BY: BHIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: VlLar'tv- 1""^,.- /"*. s fry' ^j h tI,"_ Al/-^- PUBLIC WORKS Reviewed by:Date: Comments: I fr D,so- {, Pw 4 B* nt M t? Qr4i1.@" try/* ril Associates, Inc. s and Opr:mtors of Vail atrd Bcavcr Crcclto Rc,grrrs t Office Box 7 . Vail, Colondo 81658 - \g:lltl ' hil Associates, Inc. tors ilnd Ot^-{ato.s of Vail anJ Bcavcr Crccko Rcsorts ost Officc Box 7 ' Vai[, Colondo 81658 &\ait.@" hil Associates, Inc. tors and Opcrators of \Ail and Bcavcr Crcck@ Rcsorts ost Officc Box 7 . Vail, Colorado 81658 ffi-:SN #&r Qat-nn'u -,Kw ,J^H.u lu"--"* Vail Recreation District 7q0 S. Frontage Road Eastvail, co 81657 Attn: B.J. Rowe Manor Vail Lodge 595 Vail ValleY Drive vail, co 81657 Attn: Ms. Sara Newsam Pinos Del Norte P.O. Box 69VaiI, Co 81558 Attn: Jerry Kube Qw.@ ril Associates, Inc. rs an,J Opcrators of Vail and Bcavcr Crcck@ Rcsorts ;t Office Box 7 r Vail, Colondo 81658 o Ski CIub Vail P.O. Box 518vail, co 81658 Attn: Erin Sirnpson OraiL@" ril Associates, Inc. s and Opcrators of Vail and Bcavcr Crcck@ Rcmrts t Office Box 7 . Vail, Colorado 81658 Northwoods Condoniniun Assoc. 600 Vail Valley Drivevail, co 81658 Attn: General Manager Q\ait"@" ril Associates, Inc. rs and Opcrators of Vail and Bcavcr Crcc,ko Resorts ;t Office Box 7 r Vail, Colorado 81658 A11 Seasons Condoniniun Assoc. 434 Gore Creek DriveVail, co 81657 Attn: General llanaqel Q.tail. Vail Associates, Inc. Crcaton and Opcraron of Vail and Beavcr Crceko Rcsons Post Office Box 7 o Vail, Colorado 81658 Tivoli Lodge 386 Hanson Ranch RoadVail, Co 8L657 Attn: Mr. Kern Rudolph &thit"@ Vail fusociates, Inc. Creaton and Operaton of Vail and Beavcr Creeko Rczurts Post Office Box 7 r Vail, Colondo 81658 Upper Eag1e VaIIey Sanitation District 846 Forest Roacl vail, Co 8L657 Attn: Mr. Warren Garbe &rai"@. Vail Associates, Inc. Crcators and Opcraton of Vail and Bcaver Crccko Rexrrts Post Office Box 7 o Vail, Colondo 81658 U.S. Forest Service P.o. Box 190 Minturn, CO 81645 ATTN: BiII l{ood, District Ranger --..Z]I L:.f-/ vl{I, Vail Associates, Inc. Creators and Olxrators of Vail and Bcaver Crccko Rcsorrs Post Office Box 7 o Vail, Colondo 81658 Rams-Horn L,,odge Condominiurns 416 Vail Valley Drivevail, co 81657 Attn: John & Diane Milligan O,\ail.@ Vail Associates, Inc. Crcators and Opcraton of Vail and Beavcr Crccko Rcsorts Post Office Box 7 o Vail, Colorado 81658 Rams-Horn Lodge Condoninium Assoc.Flack & Kurtz 475 sth Ave. New York, N.Y. 1001-7 Attn: Mr. Norman Kurtz ,9 \anl, .{fi trff*i:ifiif,ii',}ilf,' A'l 1 seasons condominium Assoc' lli E"i" creek Drive v.ir, co 8L657 Attn: General uanager i :ullY OC ,TTEA xog 'o'd Teo souTd uesAeN ?IBS 'sl{ :u1lv 4S9I8 oC :ITEA a^Trc rIa11e6 ITeA 969 a6poT TT?A roueld g59lg opEtoloC.llril . l:(og eq#O lsod srJoso1 oleer3 ra Bcg pus llq{ ro trolstadq pur ss 'f,ul .salslcoery IIE/ '@]lgl$ Bgglg op?roloC'UqA ' I xoq arUO rsod arocrg .1aer3 l*rtr€ pr! lm ro rtoretedg gn oor 'cul rselsleo0ry I.rEl e.d!\ lsEg pEou lcTrlsTo oriou .f.g :ul1v aggTg oc ,TTtii a6e1uo.r,g .s 004uoTlrarcau TTEA 89918 oppJoloC ,ltu[ r l, xog arg0 ls suoseu olaar] .ta^€eg pus l!q^. Jo sJorBDdO puB s('rul .serqeossv Fu '@'ITqAO a \ THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERW4 puBLtc NoTtcE{.J NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vailwill hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the MunicipalCode of theTown of Vailon Septemberl3, 1993, at2:00 P.M. intheTown of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: 1. A request for an amendment to SDD #4, Area D, to allow an expansion to the Glen Lyon Office Building located at 1000 South Frontage Road WesULot 45, Block K, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Paul M. DeBoer, representing Calumet FederalSavings and LoanPlanner: Shelly Mello 2. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District, a CCI exterior alleration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Hoad/Lots A, B, C, Block 2 and Tract E, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc.Ar'ail Associates, Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.Planner: Mike Mollica 3. A request for a density variance and a setback variance to allow for an expansion to a residence located at Lot 198, Block 9, Vail Intermountainl2S54 Snowberry Drive. Applicant: Millie Hammer, Chris and Mary Ball Planner: Jim Curnutte 4. A request for setback and site coverage variances to allow for a new residence on Lot 18, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing/S25 Forest Road. Applicant: Timothy DdskoPlanner: Andy Knudtsen 5. A request for a minor subdivision, a request for variances for wall heights, construction in an area with slopes in excess of 4Ooh and parking in the front setback and an amendment to the approved development plan for the for the Briar Patch development ' located at 1398 Butfehr Creek Road/Lot F, Uonsridge Subdivision Filing No. 2. Applicant Briar Patch CondominiumsPlanner: Shelly Mello 6. A review of a request to lift a deed restriction for the Todger Anderson residence focated at Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Lionsridge 4th Filingl1775 Sandstone Drive. Applicanl: Todger Anderson, represented by Tom Braun, Peter Jamar Associates Andy KnudtsenPlanner: 7. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District to allow the expansion of the Vail Athletic Club, located at 352 East Meadow Drive, and more specifically described as follows: A parcel oJ land in Tract B, Vail Vilhg€, First Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Commencing al the Northeast corner of said Tract B; thence N 79"46'00' W along thE Northerly line ol Vail Village, First Filing, and along th€ Northerly lin6 of said Tract B 622.86 fe€t; th€nce S 06'26'52" W a disiance ol 348.83 teet to the Soulhw€st comer of thal parcel of land described in Book 191 at Page 139 as recorded January'10, 1966 and liled in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County R€cords, said corner also being the True Point ol Beginning; thence S 79"04'08" E and along th6 Soulherly line of said parcel 200.00 feet to the Southeasi comer thereof; th€nc€ N 62'52'00' E and along the Norlh€rty line ol that parcel of land described in Book 222 at Pag6 513 as recorded in 1971 in the Eagle Counly Records, a distance of 66.78 teet lo the Northeasterly comer of said parcel of land; salj corner being on lh€ Westerly right-ol-way line of Gore Creek Road, as platted in Vail Village, Fiith Filing; thence N 27'1937' W a distance 0177.37 teel along sairJ West€rly rightof-way line of Gore Creek Road; thence N 89oag'22'W a distance of 12.80 feet to the Northeasterly cornor of that parcel of hnd described in Book 191, Pags 139 as recorded January 10, 1966 and tiled in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County R€cords; thence Northw€sterly 26.51 fegt along the arc ol a 37.50 fe€t radius curve to the lott having a c€ntral angle of 40"30'00' whose chord bsars N 53"40'00'W a distancE ot 25.96 feet to a point of tangency; thence N 73055'00'W and along sau tang€nt .|66.lt4 leet; thence N 85'1O21' W a distance of 50.40 lest to the Norlhwestorly corner of th€ Mountain Haus Parcel; thenco S 02o18'00'W ard along the east€rly linE of said Mountain Haus Parcel a dislanca ot lOO,OO te€t to the Soulheasterly comer lhereol; thence S 45013'53' E a distance ol 38.70 t€el to the True Point ol Beginning, containing 30,486 squar€ teet, more or less. Applicant Vail Athletic Club Plannen Shelly Mello 8. A request for a density variance and a setback variance to allow for an addition to Unit 28, Tract B, Bighom Townhomes/4718 Meadow Drive. Applicant Jerald and Mary Lou Kocak and John and Julie Mork Plannen Jim Curnutte . A request to amend the Golden Peak Ski Base development plan and a request for a landscape variance for Tract F, Vail Village Sth Filing/2158 Vail Valley Drive. Applicant Vail Associates, Inc. Planner:Andy Knudtsen 10. A request for a minor subdivision for Lot 1 , Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing/38l Beaver Dam Circle. Applicant: Leo PaYne Planner: Jim Curnutte Tour^r oF*;;;L Hiscel laneor.rs Cash E8_1?*s3 1€,;l?:iff Eeceipt # ltFErSF Hctroun t * Ug IHC',e0t.tIltG CCIIE HntoLrnt tende re,J ..r Irem paid 610SgB4tSSFB8EI u=hange returne,J l THFh|l< \|C}I.J V,fur cashier REHTHF TII.IEHIII,IEHT FEE HF t56.8s fuqrnt paid ?5[r. Erff R. Erff t;1 DATE. RDCETVEDFROM ADDRBSS N9 451t7 " r? -\l PLEASE TOWN OF VAIL D EPA RT|\,I El. T O F CO M :VItJN ITY D EVELO P }IENT . S.ILES ACTION FOR;\{ 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD vArL, CoLoMDO 81657 DATE 0t 0000 4 t5{0 ZC\T\G .fu\D A DDRESS T{APS 0l 0000 424 t5 IINII OL\{ B UILDf, '''G CO D E 0l 0000 { 24 IJ UMFOR.\{ PI.UMBDIG CODE 0l 000042.r15 .l UMFOR\'!j\tEcHrI'tCALCODE 0t 00co {2,r l5 UNIFOfu\' FIRE CODE 0t 0000 {2415 N,\TIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 0t 0000 .{24 t5 OTIJER CODE BOOKS 0t c'000.1t543 BLUE PRINIS T:\IYLAR 0t 0000 {2412 ):ER,OX COPIES / STUDTES 0t 00co J2371 PENA l.TY FEES / R E-l,-'S PECIONS 0t 00c0{t332 PL,L\ REVIE1V RE.CHECK FEE IS<O FER, HR, 0l 0000 42321 I OFF I{OURS |\--SPECTION FE,i-s 0t 0000.11{t2 coNTir..\ cTo Rs LlcE\s Es FEI:.S 0t cr0004t330 SIGN APPLICATION FEE.0t cpoo 4t1r3 0r 00co4l{t3 ADDTNON^I. SIGNAGE t;E ISI.OO ''gR, SO.IT. 0l 0000 424-10 VTC ART PROJF.CT DONAT]ON 0t 0c90.1r33r PRE PA'D DESIGN REVIE1V BOARD FEE 0r coo0424l2 BUILDING-CONSTRUCTION PERMIT COMPUTER DI 0 41010 T x 0i 0000 42371 TNVESTTGATToN FEE (BUrLDlNc)TOTAL DUE: ONAL USE R ^LTERAT]ON ITIORETH^N ICOSO.FT. !1330 rsPEcLA EVELOPT'ENT DISTRICT I},IINOR AT{ .il330 tzoNINc co * * rb * * * * * i rctorrl Pet0on Dato fln.-. PETMON FORII FOR AIIET{DilENT TO ofr- R8OUEI;TTOR Thls plocedure b roquired lor any amendmgnt to the zonlrp ordlnance or for a request for a dlstrlcil boundary change. A. NAMEOF PHONEltT_:j121 B. ADDBESS P4 B"x 7 Vail Ca NAME OF OWNER or typo I Vail A ttoa,ttu,t T,r. SIGNATUR ADDRESS PO. Bax 7 Vaii D. L@ATION OF PROPOSAL: ADDRESS PHONE 17 ? -3137 c. PHONE E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:LOT FEE: Zonlng Amendmentg: $250.00PAID CHECK # BLOCK- FlLtNc Y Y 5rt fi l,nqI Rezonlngs: $200.00 DATE ilt. F. Stamped, addressed envelopes and list of fie names ol owners of all property adiacent to the su[iect propedy. Four (4) copies of the following information: A. The petition shall include a summary ol the proposed revision of the regulations, or a complete description of the proposed changes ln disctrict boundaries and a map indicatlng th€ existing and proposed disctrict boundaries. Applicant must submit written ancuor graphic materials stating the reasons for request. Time Requirements The Plannirq and Envlronmontal Comission meets on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. A petition wih the necsssary accompanying material must be submitted four weeks prior to th6 date of the meeting. Following the Planning and Environmental Commission meeting, all amendments to the zoning ordinance or district boundary change must go tot the Town Councilfor linal action. Your proposal will be reviswed for complainace with Vail's Comprehensive Plan. lf this application reguires a separate review by any local, State or Federal agency other than the Town ol Vail, the applicaffon fee shall be increased by $200.00. Examples of sucfr review, may include, but are not limited to: Colorado Department of Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, stc. The applicant shall be responsible for paying any prUishing fees which are in exoess ol50% of the application fee. lf, at the applicant's rsquesl, any matter is posponed for hearing, causing the matter to be regDlished, then the entire fee for such re- tv. v. hearing, causlng the matbr to be re-publlshed, then he entre fee lor sucfi re- publicalion shall be paid by the appllcant. Applications deemed by he Community Development Department to have signilicant desBn, land use or other lssues wtridr may have a sbniftcant lmpacl on the community may requlre rcvlew by consulhnts other than town statt. Should a detsrmlnatlon be mde by the town staff that an outslde consultant ls needed to revieu, any appllcation, thg Community Development Department may hire an outside @nsuttant, lt shall €Urnate the amount of money neoossary to pay hlm or her and this amounl shall be foruarded to lhe Town by the applicant at he tme he filas hls application with tho Community Development Deparlrnent. Upon completion of the revlew of the applicaUon by the @nsultiant, any of the funds forwarded by the applicant lor payment of the consultiant whidr hav€ not been paid to the consultant shall be retumed to the apdicant. Expenses incuned by the Town in excess of the amount lorwardod by the +pllcation shall be pau to tha Town by the applicant within 30 days of notification by the Town. Golden Peak Development Plan Amendment August 16, 1993 This requested amendment to the Golden Peak Development Plan contains the following elements; 1. Utilize the existing Gold Peak tennis courts as paid public parking. 2. Utilize the eastern third of the existing parking lot as a Town of Vail Bus turn around and drop off. 3. Utilize the existing Gold Peak bus stop as a drop offpoint for the Children's Center. 4. Continue utilizing the current skier drop off as it now exists. 5. Utilize the interior ofthe bus turn around and drop ofas controlled parking for Vail Associates, Inc.'s supervisory staff. This proposal is of a temporary and trial nature, 93-94 ski season, it represents an attempt on the part of Vail Associates and the Town of Vail to segrcgate the various vehicular functions that take place in the Gold Peak area. By providing the bus system with a separate and gated turn around and drop offthe current conflicts with private vehicles should be reduced or eliminated. A separate drop offfor the Children's Center will help alleviate the high level of visitor dissatisfaction with the cunent drop off. Parking on the tennis courts is seen as a method of financing the improvements necessary to the proposal. In combination, all the elements of this proposed amendment should improve vehicular circulation in the Gold Peak area, reduce conflicts between the Town of Vail buses and private vehicle, reduce the manpower required to manage traffic in the area for both Vail Associates and Town of Vail, and should generally improve public safety. a r€vised L0/5/92 Application PEC MEETING DaEeE-14-- DArdli:" -i'ilgtl I. APPLICATTON This procedure is requiredvariance. The application information is submit.ted. FOR A VTIRIA}ICE for any project requesting a will not be accepted until all a 4 taT/ ADDRESS P,A, Bar 7 VaiI .4. PHONE 4 71 - 38 q B. NAME OF APPLICANT'S FEPRESENTATTVE ADDRESS PHoNE +71- 3131 OF OWNER(S) (type or print) OWNER(S) SIGNATURE (S) ADDF{EiI P n. BaY -7 V);1, C 2 g/65A PHoNE q7q -3/37 D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:LEGAL DESCRIPTI ON : t+r-fn a 212[ BLOCK FILING ADDRESS 4lle"/a" FEE $25o. oo ,oroWr^ u l-. The relationship of the requested variance toother existing or pot.ential uses and structures inthe vicinity. THE FEE MUSE BE PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WILL ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL. F. Stamped, addressed envelopes of the names of owners ofall property adjacent to t.he subject property INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS STREETS, and a list. of their names and mailing addresses. THE APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILTNG ADDRESSES. IL A pre-application conference with a planning staff nember isstrongly suggested to determine if any additionalinformation is needed. No application will be acceptedunless it is complete (must. include all itens required bythe zoning administrator). It is t.he applicantrsresponsibility to make an appointment h'ith the staff to findout about additional submittal requirements. III. PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION WILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR YOUR PROJECT BY DECREASING THE NUMBER OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION (PEC) MAY STIPULATE. :IIL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE COMPLIED WITH BEFORE ABUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED: A. A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTED AND THE REGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS: t z. Jl: ""gf. E.o wnrcn rerrei =ro* crrf.rlcc o.rl-iteral i.nterpretation and enforceme-nt of aspecified regulat.ion is necessary to achievecompatibility and uniformity of treatment amongsites i-n the vicinity or to attaj-n the objectivesof this title wit.hout grant of special privilege. 3. The effect of the variance on light and air,distribution of population, transportation,traffj-c facilities, utilitiesr and public safety. 4. How your request complies with Vailts Comprehensive Plan. A topographic and/or improvemenL survey at a scale ofat least 1rr : 20t stamped by a Colorado l-icensedsurveyor including locations of all existing improvements, including grades and elevations. Otherelements which must be shown are parking and loadingareas, ingress and egress, Iandsclped aieas and utility and drainage features. A site plan at a scaLe of at least Lr - 20, showingexisting and proposed buiLdings. A11 preliminary building elevations and floor planssufficient to indicate the dinensions, general appearance, scale and use of alL buildings and spacesexisting and proposed on the site. A prelininary title report to verify ownership and easements, If the proposal is located in a mul-ti-family development which has a homeowners, association, thenwritten approval from the association in support of theproject. must abe received by a duJ-y authorj-zed agentfor said association. Any addit.ional material necessary for the revj-ew of theapplication as determined by the zoning administrator. For interior modifications, an improvement survey andsit.e plan may be waived by the zoning administrator. IV. TIME REQUIREMENTS The Planning and Environmental Commission meets on the2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. A completeapplication form and all accompanying material (asdescribed above) must be submitted a minimum of four(4) weeks prior to t.he date of the PEC public hearing.No incomplete applications (as determined by the zoningadministrator) will- be accept.ed by the planning staffbefore or aft.er the designated submittal date. ALl PEC approved variances shal_I J_apse if constructionis not commenced within one year of the date ofapproval and diligently pursued to completion. ff this application requires a separate review by anylocal, State or Federal agency other than the Town ofVai1, the application fee shall be increased by$200.00. Examples of such review, may include, but arenot limlted to: Colorado Department of Highway AccessPermits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc. The applicant shall be responsible for paying anypublishing fees which are in excess of 50E of theapplication fee. Tf, at the applicantrs requestr dnymatter is postponed for hearing, causing the matter tobe re-published, t.hen, Lhe entire fee for such re-publication shall be paid by the applicant. B. D: Ft 9. A. R Av. 3*:n:i:";,ofr:T:o"?Lll:.::ll::l;":"I:i3nil3l'o, - other issues which may have a significant impact on the q", community may require review by consultants other that town staff. Shoufd a determination be made by the town staff that an outside consultant is needed to review any application, Community Development may hire an out.side consultant, it shaLl estimate the amount of money necessary to pay him or her and this amount shall" be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at Lhe time he files his application wit.h Lhe Corununity Development Department. Upon compLetion of the review of the application by the consultant, any of the funds forwarded by the applicant for payment of the consultant which have not been paid to the consultantshall be returned to the applicant. Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of the arnount forwarded by theapplicant shall be paid to the Town by the appJ-icant,within 30 days of notification by the Town. Golden Peak Landscape Variance Request Submitted August 16, 1992 Itr A The variance requested is for relieffrom the required landscaping that would normally be required in conjunction with the development or re-development of a parking area. As a one year experiment, Vail Associates, Inc., with the Town of Vail, wish to re configure the circulation in the Golden Peak area. The parking lots and bus and skier drop offs would be change, and parking would be instituted on the tennis courts. As this is a trial of a new circulation scheme controlling cost is of utmost importance. In the event that the trial is successful and becomes a long term arrangement, a more complete landscape plan would be implemented. IIIA I The requested variance is related to a situation, potentially temporary, that would leave virtually all the existing landscaping in place. As such, this variance from the required landscaping should have no effect on existing <ir potential uses and structures in the vicinity. IIIA 2 As this is a trial arrangement, that may not become permanent, it would be unreasonable to require the installation of what could be temporary landscaping for a winter season. As such the granting of this request would not constitute a granting of special privilege. IIIA 3 The granting of this request for a variance from the required landscaping would have no effect on light and air, distribution of population, transportation, traffic facilities, utilities, and public safety. The re configuring of the circulation of the area may have a quite positive effect on fiansportation, traffic facilities, and public safety. IIIA 4 Technically this request for a variance from the required landscaping is not in conformance with the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan. However, this non conformance should be balanced against the temporary nature of the proposal and the improvements to vehicular circulation and enhanced public safety it could produce,