HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL LIONSHEAD FILING 3 BLOCK 1 LOT 8 LION SQUARE NORTH COMMON 4,t
t
.
::r: .
;...::'.
't :': t'
:,:.:,,r.,l
':,:t:',:
:-.1.:,.'
i"..::;..:!
:.'.i l'
.r-: .:
.:':. :.
::-::,,:
..':';
:.:',r'
:,+.,::
la.';.'.i
_. .:l:,
ir'i....:
ra.
j.:'
,,.-.
::::::"
:.a..
I Attachmenr F
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Councilof the Town of Vailwill hold a public hearing in
accordance wilh Section 12-3-3, Vail Town Code, on Tuesday, August 1, 2006, at 6:00 PM in the
Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of:
ITEM/TOPIC:
An appeal, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, of the Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission's approval, with condilions, of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to
SeCtion 12-7H-7, Major Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the
renovation of the Lion's Square Lodge North, localed at 660 Wesl Lionshead Place/Lot 8, Block 1,
Vail Lionshead Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC06-0019)
Appellant: Vail Town Council and Montaneros Condominium Association, Inc. iPlanner: Bill Gibson
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Depanment, 75 South Frontage
Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public
hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2'138tor
additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Gx
*tl,!
*
L
E N i{AliC E il v
SKI YARC :
I
qru;
\d-.. kJ
I rF'
,ll
L_l_!t....
4,.
J'
SHEA&''- G' ,,6I,Ttr*i
+'1
i,htri.
/ do" \.*i* &l
, { f "?:, -:.. /
Ea*" G
. j .a:t:/
r,f gL i o. I, r-
',trtl- tc*r'..'tll -YI , :I --),f;L1- .' IE: 'f
irL.*.
;_',
t
4t
_1_----_1-_
2.1
Crnsrrn2 Iurnonucrrou
CHAPTER 2
Introduction
Purpose of the Master Plan
This master plan was lnitiated by the Town of Vail to encourage redevelopment and new
development initiatives within the Lionshead study area. Both public and private
interests have recognized that Lionshead today lacks the economic vitality of Vail
Village, its neighboring commercial district, and fails to offer a world-class resort
experience. Lionshead's economic potential has been inhibited by a number ofrecunent
themes: lack of growth in accommodation units ("hot beds"), poor retail quality, the
apparent deterioration ofexisting buildings, an uninteresting and disconnected pedestrian
environment, mediocre architectural character. and the absence of incentives for
redevelopment.
Redevelopment is critical for Vail and Lionshead if the community is to remain a
competitive four-season resort. Other resorts are spending millions of dollars to upgrade
their facilities in order to attract more visitors year-round. Growth in the number of
skiers annually has slowed to one to two percent, intensifying competition for market
share. Skiers are spending less time skiing and more time shopping, dining out, and
enjoying other off-mountain activities. As a result, the demand for quality retail
shopping and a greater diversity ofexperiences has dramatically increased. All ofthese
are sorely in need of improvement in Lionshead. Vail, and specihcally Lionshead, will
fall behind if the community fails to upgrade the quality of its facilities and correct the
existing flaws in its primary commercial nodes.
This master plan, developed over a period of two years and with extensive involvement
by the community, is a comprehensive guide for property owners proposing to undertake
development or redevelopment of their properties and the municipal oflicials responsible
for planning public improvements. The plan outlines the Town's objectives and goals for
the enhancement ofLionshead and proposes recommendations, incentives, and
requirements for redevelopment and new development of public and private properties.
It also recommends specific public improvement projects that are strategically important
to the future success of Lionshead.
The master plan is intended to provide direction over the next [5 to 20 years.
LrottsHpen RcDEVELopMENT MASTER PLAN PAGE 2-I
CHapreR2 lNrRooucnoN
2.2 Definition of a Master plan
In the development of the Lionshead Master Plan, the following definition has been usedas the basis for this work
A master plan is a guide, a flexible framework for future action. It articulates acommunity's fundamentar rand use poricies, pri".i;i;;;; g'ot, in a broad and' general *il_]lnl1; fol t{e frturg ptrvsicai rr*"rop*l* oJrldeveropmenr of anarea of the community, including itsfunctional
""A."irt"l"l#systems and itspublic facilities.
The land use policies in a master plan are gencrary impremented through zoningordinances. Existing zoning and iand useiodes;;til;f"d and newprovisions enacted in orderio conform to the master pr;;;;"rry out the pran,sobjectives.
A master nln doe3
:rot.convey apprwal for particular development proposals orconcepts, nor can it be implemented in a short time tame. eter adoption of theLionshead Master pran, every deveropment proposal wi, have to go through theapplicabre development review and upp-uui p.b""r., withits attendant publicnotices *1!l_blj" hearings.. A proposal's uori"."n""io'ir," por].i", contained inrhe adopted master pran wi' be'one of.th3 fagols """ry"J ['v ,off, the pranningand Environmental commission (pEC), the Design n""i"*-rio*a (DRB), and theTown counc'(as applicable) in ieterrnining whether to approve or disapprovethe specific proposal.
2.3 Policy Objectives
The Town councir fon19o six poricy objectives on November 4, 1996 to outrine theimportant issues to be addressed i" tri" *'^i"r plan and to provide a policy frarnework forthe master planning process.
2,3.1 Renewal and Redevelopment
Lionshead can and shourd be renewed and redeveloped to become a warmer,' more vibrant environment for guests and residents. rionrrr"uJi."ds an appealingand coherent identity, a sense Jfph"", a personality, a purpose, and an improvedaesthetic character.
2.3.2 Vitality and Amenities
we must seize the opportunity to enhance guest experience and communityinteraction thr6ugh Jipuno"a uno ua-aitionar activities and amenities such asperforming arts venues, conference facilities, i"".in*", rti"*rl"p", purtsunaother recreational improvements.
I
I
t
t
t
I
t
Ptcn2-2 Lroxssnao RponvsropMENr Mnsrpn p'ifil
CHAYTER2 INTRODUCTTON
2.3,3 Stronger Economic Base Through Increased Live Beds
In order to enhance the vitality and viability of Vail' renewal and redevelopment
in Lionshead must promotJ itip'on"Jottup*"y rates and the creation of
additional bed base C'riu" irJJJot "warm beds'i) through new lodging products'
Improved Access and Circulation
The flow of pedestrian, vehicular, bicycle and mass transit raffic must be
improved within and through Lionshead'
Improved Infrastructure
The infrastructure of Lionshead (streets' walkways' tansportation- syst€ms'
ililililt,t"s' toading and deiivery systems' snow removal and storage
i"p".iojl""a its public *J p'iuatt*it"b*,T":lb^: upgraded'o tul-!:-T,^--
-
redevelopment and revitaiization efforts and to meet thJservice expectations of our
guests and residents.
2.3.6 Creative Financing for Enhanced Private Prolits and Public Revenues
Financialtycreativeandfiscallyrealisticstrategiesmustbeidentifiedsothat
adequate dir"t;;il; ,"irJ'ft'"t" uiip".riui-" sources to tund desired private
. and Public imProvements'
2.4 Ground Rules for the Master Planning Process
onNovember4,lgg6,theTowncoungi_ra{optedthefollowinggroungrulesforthe
master planning 6;.;-i; ooo., to ctariry ttre'iiitiuipurunl.tto and rules under which the
master Plan would be develoPed'
.l.ThemasterplantobedevelopedforaltpublicandprivatelandsinLionsheadwillserveas
the policy fr;;;J i* uiin'*" at"iiioi-tnuting on specific development and
redevelopment proposals in Lionshead. ii. t*J.ipf.n will be based on the Lionshead
policy objectives adopted by the Town councit to reflect the community's interests'
l.TlreTownofVailwillworkco|laborativelywithVailResorts,Inc.onthemasterplanfor
Lionshead and will i"";i;.;;rh* int.r"i"O citizens, business owners and property
ownersinthemasterplanningprocess.Themasterplanultimatelyrecommendedmayor
may not reflect devetopii"nt"uipto""r'"' currently bling explored by VRI'
3. Proprietary information of any private p':p"q owner or developer will remain private
andconfidentialuntessitbecomespartofapublicrecord.
4. There will be no net loss to the vail community of either tocals' housing or parking
- ;;; i;;irt *a private) now existing in Lionshead'
5.Collaborativepublic/privateredevelopm€ntandfinancingventures,includingurban
renewal authorities anddowntown development authoritGs, will be considered'
l,
I
I
LtoNsnreo REoevpLopvlENT MASTER PLAN PAGE 2.3
oo
Cnarrsn 4 MASTER PLAN Rncouwr.nerroNs - Ovpnet l SruDy AREA
CHAPTER 4
Master Plan Recommendations, Overall Studv Area
This section ofthe master plan addresses issues that affect Lionshead as a whole. These issues -
and recommendations to address them - should be considered in all planning and policy
decisions as Lionshead redevelops.
4.1 Underlying Physical Framework of Lionshead
' The Lionshead resort area (that portion of the study area north of Gore Creek) is a mixed-
use urban environment with several discernible land-use sub-areas, or "hubs" (see Map
N). Although the hubs overlap somewha! there is no consistent and comprehensive
pedestrian connection between them. The primary goal of the master plan is to create a
visually interesting and functionally efficient pedestrian environrnent that connects the
hubs to create a cohesive and memorable resort environment.
4.1.1 Lionshead Master Plan Concept
Two primary pedestrian streets form the backbone of Lionshead's physical plan:
an east-west corridor connecting Dobson Ice Arena with the west end of
Lionshead and a north-south corridor connecting the proposed north day lot
transportation center with the ski yard. The circulation system and new retail and
lodging components will follow the underlying pattern set by these corridors (see
Map T) and the entry portals associated with them.
4.1.2 East Lionshead - Civic IIub
The civic hub of Lionshead is comprised of Dobson Ice Arena, the Vail public
library, the Lionshead public parking structure, and the proposed Vail Civic
Center site on the east end of the parking structure. Although this area also
contains several lodging properties and may support o{Iice or retail development
in the future, all planning and design decisions here should be respectful ofand
. compatible with these civic components.
4.1.3 Resort Retail and Commercial IIub
This are4 also known as the Lionshead pedestrian core, is the heart oflionshead
and the epicenter of pedestrian and retail activity. A mixed-use environment, this
area is comprised of retail shops, skier services, offices, residential units, and
restaurants, but it has no coherent identity. More people access the mountain
from here than from Vail village, yet the.area experiences low retail sales and
weak evening activity. Non-retail businesses in what should be a high volume. retail environment further erode its retail potential.
LIoT.ISHEAD RJDEVELoPMENT MesTnn PIAN ,PAGE4-I
CHApTER 4 M,qsrEn Pr,aN RpcourrlnNoATroNs - OvnRall Sruny Anre
The priority for this area is to reinforce and enhance the idetuity of a premier
destirtation resofi. This requires higher quality retail activity, an active pedestrian
environment, greater diversity ofpublic spaces, and a focus on lodgings that
reinforce activity. All planning and design decisions should further Jhis goal.
A priority need identified by the master plan is a high quality resort hotel in the
Lionshead core to provide the dynamic infusion of people that will support a
vibrant retail district. A corollary need is a more identifiable pedestrian portal
into the Lionshead core from the west; the absence of a well-designed gateway
from this side is a significant obstacle to the capture ofthe west Lionshead bed
base by core area retailers.
4.1.4 Resort Lodging Hub
This area ofLionshead is located just west ofthe Lionshead retail core and is
comprised almost €xclusively of higr-Aensityresidential and lodging products.
All future planning and design decisions in this area should work to reinforce the
residential nature ofthe neighborhood and retain the sense ofprivacy desired by
individual properties. New development in this area should aim for quieter
pedestrian streets, well-defi ned pedestrian connections, more intensive
landscaping and higher quality streetscape development.
4.1.5 West Lionshead - ResidentiaU Mixed-Use Hub
The western end of Lionshead, currently undeveloped, is home to parking lots, the
Vail Associates service yard, the Vail sanitation plan! the old town shops, and a
gas station. Uses proposed by the community on this site in the past include
increased parking, employee housing, office space, mountain service access, and
an eastbound I-70 on- and oFramp.
The master plan recommends that this hub become a residential/ mixed-use area
with an emphasis on meeting the needs of the local communrry. Appropriate uses
could include high-density real estate development, lodging, community based
office and retail space, employee housing and parking. The opportunity exists for
a significant locals or seasonal housing development in this area. To the extent
possible development pattems in this area should reflect north-south orientation
ofbuildings; visual penetrations to the mountain, and a pedestrian oriented
environment. In addition there is the opportunity foran underground public
parking facility. All service and delivery demands created by development in this
area shall be accommodated on-site.
The site will continue to accommodate the existing and potentially expanded
functions of the Vail sanitation plant. The mountain service yard will be reduced
in size, as some functions can be moved to less central locations. However the
area develops it is critical that new uses be connected to the primary pedestrian
corridors and that they be served by the Town of Vail in-town transit system.
4,2 Connection to Vail Viltage
l
I
I
t
Pnce4-2 Lrolisnelo RsnsvpLopMENT Mnsrsn pleN
o
4.3
CHASTER 4 Masren Pr-aN REcoMIV{ENDATIoNS - OvERerr. STUDv AREA
The lack of connection between Lionshead and Vail Village was identified early in the
master planning process. Although both West Meadow Drive and East Lionshead Circle
connect the village to Lionshead, the pedestrian systems along this corridor are poor and
the streetscape has no consistent visual character. The eastern entry to the Lionshead
study area is at Middle Creek (at the Vail public library and Dobson Ice Arena), but the
true entrance to the Lionshead retail core is at the westem end ofthe Lionshead parking
structure. Pedestrian connections should be sensitive to the residential uses on West
Meadow Drive and East Lionshead Circle. It is also important that they be continuous
from the intersection of Vail Road and East Meadow Drive in Vail to the west endbf the
parking structure in Lionshead. The Town of Vail Streetscape Master PIan
recommendations for West Meadow Drive should be implemented in a way that is
consistent in design and character with the entire Vail Village/ Lionshead connection.
Connections to the Natural Environment
One of the outstanding characteristics of Vail Village is its spectacular visua[ connection
to Vail Mountain, particularly the protected view corridors up Bridge Street from the
village parking structure and toward the Gore Range from East Meadow Drive' Over the
years the village has also strengthened its physical connections to the natural
environment by improving creekside parks and trails and by integrating landscape into
the built environment at every opportunity.
Lionshead has no similarly strong connection to the natural environment even though it is
situated even closer to the base of the mountain. To remedy this critical deficiency, the
following recommendations are made:
4.3.1 VisualConnections
As development and redevelopment occur in Lionshead, it will be vital to protect
visual connections to the ski mountain. These visual relationships strengthen the
identity oflionshead as an alpine resort and provide a visual reference that helps
Lionshead visitors to find their way through the core. Visual connections to the
natural environment should be established utilizing the following techniques:
4.3.1.1 View Corridors
Creating and establishing view comidors is an effective way to link the
urban core of Lionshead visually to the natural environment of Gore
Creek and the mountain. The master plan is recommending the
creation of several dedicated pzDlrc view conidors. In addition, all
private development and t'edevelopment should endeavor to create
visual connections from and through their pioperties.
View corridors do not have to be expansive to be effective. In many
cases, a slender but well targeted view corridor can bejust as effective
as a broad view. Nor do visual connections have to be continuous;
they can reoccur, providing intermittent views from different angles'
LIoNSHEAD R.EDEVELoPMENT MASTER PLAN PAGE 4.3
o
CHepren4 Masrrn Prar.I RBcorarasNDATroNs - OvERALL SruDy AREA
4.3.1,2 North-South Orientation of Buildings
The predominant east-w€st orientation of buildings in Lionshead acts
as a visual and physical barrier, interrupting the c6nnection to the
naturar environment. It should be a priority in fufure deveropment andredeveropment to orient verticar building masses along a north-south
axis whenever possible. This wil help to accomplishihe foilowing
objectives:
a. Sun Access
During thewinter months, the sun is low in the southem sky,providing the greatest sorar exposure to the soutrr faces ofbuildings
arid to streets and spaces open to the south. A north-south orientationof building m1"ses will increase the amount of sun reaching the
Lionshead pedestrian core andthe buildings to the norttt
--1
b. Viewsfrom New Buildings
In double loaded buildings oriented on an east-west axis, units on thesouth side of the buirding get greatviews of the mountain, but units onthe north side do not. orienting the buirding mass on a nort'*outrr
line creates angled southern viJws for Dori Iides ofthe building, andunits on both sides will get direct sun sometime during the day.
c. Viewsfrom Existing Buildings
Public input throughout the masier planning proc€ss indicated thatexisting property owners in Lionshiad are ioncemed that new
development will block their private views to the mountain. Byorienting new buildings on a north_south axis, the potential visual
impact on existing buildings is reduced.
d. CreationofStreets
A strong view corridor in the Vail Villageis Bridge Street. The
orientation ofthe street toward the.ountuin proiides a constant senseofdirection and draws peopte to the destination at the top oithe street.
Likewise, the proposednorth_south orientation of buiruiigs-in
Lionshead will help to create streets oriented to the viewisomething
that is almost completely lacking today.
4.g.2 Physical Connections
Physical connections to the natural environment are essential to the experientialquality of a mountain resort. There are several ways to achieve
"
pr,vr,'i.rr
connection in addition to creating north_south oriented streets:
43.2.1 Landscape and Greenbelt Corridors
wherever possibre the naturar landscape of the Gore creek corridor
should be alrowed to penetrate into th; more urbaniJportioo, or
I
I
PAGE 4-4
I
I
I
I
L rorsnrno REDEvELopMENT MA;#i-Fili
cnePren 4 M,c,sre n PLaN RscotvtvtsxDATroNs - Ovrnet-l Sruoy Annn
Lionshead (see Map O). This will open up access points to the Gore
Creek conidor, enhance the quality of individual properties, and
improve the image of Lionshead as an alpine resort.
4.3.2,2 Skier Bridge
The skier bridge is the primary existing connection between Lionshead
and the south side of Gore Creek. It is too narrow and enclosed, anc
could be much more dramatic in design. The replacement of the skier
bridge, as both a skier and a pedestrian connection, should be a
priority. This is a major opportunity to replace a weak architectural
element with a significant landmark.
4,3.2.3 Access to the South Side of Gore Creek
In addition to the skier bridge, one additional footbridge connects the
Lionshead core to the south side of Gore Creek. An opportunity exists
to create a significant conn€ction between the ski yard and the
beautiful lowland area south of Gore Creek. Regarding this area, the
following recommendations are made:
a. Presemation of Narural Character
Any recreational use in this area must be subordinate to the
preservation of the nafural environment and its inherent character.
b. Creation of a lnw-Impact Trail System
A consolidated trail system to prevenl further degradation ofthis area
by social trails is needed. Asphalt paving or other, more urbanized
paving systems are environmentally and visually inappropriate.- Interpretive signage and educational opportunities should be
considered as part of any recreational improvements. Trail systems
should have provisions for seating and waste disposal.
. c. 'Connection to the Riparian Environment
The extension of low-impact trails to the water's edge is encouraged,
creating safe, designated areas for adults and children to get their feet
wet and interact with the creek. The safety of users must be a primary
concem in design.
LToNSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN Pacr 4-5
cHAprER 4 MasreR plen RecoMMsNDATroNs - ovnRen srunv Anpa
4.4 Public View Corridors
on May 20,1997, recognizing the importance of visual connections, the vail rowncouncil approved the use of the existing Town of lail view conidor ordinance to
designate the flrst protected public view corridors in Lionshead. In order to qualiry for
protection under the Town's ordinance, a view corridor must meet the following ciiteria:
a. Is the view critical to the identity, civic pride, and sense ofplace oflionshead? A
nice view is not sufficient.
b. Is the view seen from a widely used, pubriciy accessible viewpoint? views from
ryiuate property cannot be recognized or protected by this ordinance.c. Is the view threatened? Is there a possibiiity that development on nearby property
would block the view?
It is critical to note that the following recommended public view corridors will create a
development constraint that will workwithall other appticable development and
regulatory guidelines and standards. The suggested location and outline ofany viewconidor is not intended to create a "build-to'; iine fo{ a vertical architectural edge that
would not be allowed under other applicable guidelines and standards.
According- to these criteria and following an intensive public input process, protection of
the following public view corridors is recommended (see Map O): '
Masrsn PLaNPAGE 4.6 Lrot'lsHpep RsnBvetopMENT
o
Crnrrpn 4 MASTER PLAN REcouueuoenoNs _ OvpneLL SruDy AFsA
4.82
4.83
anticipated that the employee base utilizing this surface lot will
decrease; therefore., ail the cunent parking (approximately 160 spaceslwill have to be replaced
4.8.1J Charter Bus parking Lot
The charter bus parking area on the east end ofthe Lionshead parking
structure is the proposed location for a future vail civic/communitv
center. The prgp"tty is extremely valuable to the community, *O"it,
cunent utirization as a parking lot is not its highest and best use.
Alternate locations for charter bus parking include the Ford park
parking lot and a down-valley site. A drop-offpoint for the buses wilstill be necessary and is recommended,rs a component of the proposed
transit center on the north dav lot.
Residential Properties
As a policy, all residential properties shourd provide their own parking withintleir grogertr according to existing Town of vail regulations uno tt
" larametersdescribed above.
Public Parking
Public parking in Lionshead today consists ofthe Lionshead parking sfructure,which has a capacity of approximately 1200 vehicles.
4.8.3.1 ExistingparkingShortfall
The l99l Vail Transportation Master plan suggested a town-wide
peak period parking shortfall of 500 spaces. Overflow volumes are
experienced approximately 20-30 days psr year.
4.8.3.2 Potential New parking Demand
See appendix A, traffic impact study.
4.8.3.3 Potential New parking Sites
To respond to the projected parking demand increase discussed in the
. traffic study, it is strongly recommended that all town-wide parking
opporturities be examined or re-examined prior to any f'oat planning
or parking constuction. Specific public parking opportunities in
Lionshead include:
a. Lionshead parking Structure
The existing Lionshead parking structure is a logical location for
gxpanded public parking because it is already owned by the Town ofVail- Also, the structure is conveniently located betrveln the proposed
civic center on th€ east and the main portal to the Lionshead pedestrian
mall on the west. No other location offers visitors such ease'of access.
Lroxsrmeo RronvELopMENT MASTER PLAN Pecn 4:35
o
4.9
Crnyrpn 4 MesrBn Preu RscoMMENoArroNs - OvERALL Sruov Anne
4.8.4 Parking for f,mployee Housing
The unit-to-parking space ratio for employee housing should be reduced to
maximize the housing opportunities in west Lionshead. During the master
planning process, the Vail Town Council toured several employee housing
complexes in Keystone Resort that averaged .25 cars per bed (one parking space
per four-bed unit). Most of these complexes at Keystone are removed from the
core and depend on a bus transit system to cany employees to and from work.
Yet, Keystone property managerc have not observed a parking shortage.
Likewise, at the Rivers Edge employee housing project in Avon, a parking ratio
of.75 cars per bed has been more than adequate and the parking lot is
underutilized.
Housing
Recent community surveys and grass-roots planning efforts such as Vail Tomonow have
identified the lack of locals housing as the most critical issue facing the Vail community.
Early in the Lionshead master planning process, west Lionshead was identified as an
opportunity area to implement some of the community's housing goals, particularly
relating to employee housing. These opportunities and associated issues are outlined
below.
4.9.1 No Net Loss of Employee Ilousing
Ground rule number five of the master plan states that there shall be no net loss of
employee housing in Lionshead as redevelopment occurs.
4.9,2 Visual Issues
The financial realities of affordable housing often require cost rcducing measures,
generally involving the quality ofdetailing, planning, and architectural design.
Given the strong desire to make these housing projects feasible, it is
recommended that some.latitude be granted to affordable housing developers.
However, it is also important that financial realities nol be used as an excuse to
produce unsightly, poorly designed, substandard products. Employee housing
does not need to match the architectural sophistication ofa five star resort
development, but it does need to be good quality construction and design. Rivers
Edge in Avon is a good example of an attractive yet affordable employee housing
project.
4.93 Policy Based Housing Opportunities
The first means of implementing housing goals in Lionshead is throughpoi'cy
6aned requirements such as the employee generation ordinance currently being
pursued by the Vail Town Council. As required by a future ordinance, all
development and redevelopment projects, ai a prerequisite to project approval,
should provide housing for employees generated and to the extent possible this
housing should be located in the Lionshead area.
LIONSHSAD REoEVELoPMENT MASTER PLAN PAGE 4-39
Crnprrn 4 MASTER PLAN RECoMMENDATIoNs - oveReII Srupy Anre
4.10.1.1 VehicularGateways
Because the majority of people coming to Lionshead anive by vehicre,
it is important that the vehicular arrival points announce and help
establish the identity of Lionshead. The two primary vehicular. gateways arg the east and west boundaries ofthe studv area on South
Frontage Road (see Map R). Landscaping signage, *a tn, adjacent
buildings should all communicate to motorists that they have entered
the Lionshead resort area. secondary vehicular gateways include all
ofthe cross-streets that access Lionshead from the frontage road.
These intersections should have a consistent landscape heatnent and
visible directional signage. A consistent signage package announcing
the lodging destinations on each street should be an integral
component of South Frontage Road improvements.
4,10.1.2 Pedestrian PortalV Gateways
Four primary pedestrian portals are oitical to establishing the
character and identity of Lionshead (see Map T): l) the pedestrian
entry on the west end ofthe parking structure; 2) the top ofthe grade
transition from the north day lot into the retail mall; 3) the intersection
of west Lionshead circre and Lionshead place at the western end of
the retail mill; and 4) the hansiti'on between the ski yard and the retail
mall.
4.L0.2 Landmarks
A landmark is a significant architectural element that all the visitors to Lionshead
can identify and remember. Landmarks signiS important points of entry, turning
points and critical intersections in the pedestrian network, as well as destinationJ
and visual reference points. The single landmark in Lionshead today is the
Gondola clock tower,'which will be replaced with the Vail Associates core site
redevelopment. Appropriate locations for new landmarks in Lionshead are the
east pedestrian Portal, the central retail mall adjacent to the main pedestrian plaz4
and the west pedestrian portal adacent to the intersection of wesi Lionshead
Circle and Lionshead Place. In addition" the potential civic center complex at the
east end of the parking structure should function as a significant architectural
landma* for the east end oflionshead.
LroNsHBao RTDEVELopMENT MAsTER PLAN PAGE4.43
CHemsn 4 MASTER PLAN RecoMMENnATroNs - Ovnnru.r, SruDy AREA
4,ll Public Art
Through the Art in Public Places board, thc Town of vail has long recognized the
importance of public art in pedestrian envifonments. Future development and
redevelopment projects in Lionshead, especially projects impacting the retail mall and
primary pedestrian environments, should seek to incorporate public art according to the
Town of Vail Art in Public Places Master Plan (not adopted as of the writing of this
document). Pedestrian circulation systems, portals and gateways, landmarks, pedestrian
plazas and architecture all present opportunities to incorporate public art.
4.12 Youth Recreation
Throughout the masterplan process there was public input regarding the need for both
indoor and outdoor non-skier related recreation opportunities for chitdren and youth.
Since the rdmoval of the playground south of Gore Creek in 1995, the only such activities
include the Vail Associates putt-putt gotfcourse and the open play field ofthe ski yard.
As fhe redevelopment of Lionshead progresses the creation of a programmed children's
play area should be a community priority. programmatic components of such as play
area could include "tot-lot" play equipment, a volleyball cou6 swing sets, and creative
play structures. Landscaping, benches, and picnic tables shoutd also be integrated into
the design such a play area The location ofsuch a play area wil need to be readily' accessible from the Lionshead pedestrian mall area and the Gore Creek recreation path,
and will require good southem solar exposure
In addition to the play area described above, the potential ofintegrating children's play
areas into the Lionshead pedestrian retail mall should be considered when improvements
to the mall are made. Good examples of such play areas can be found in the Aspen,
Breckenridge, and Boulder pedesftian retail dishicts.
Pece 4-44 LtoNsHnao Rponvet,opMENT Mlsrpn Pr,eN
'il: :r
,,f.',
;;- -j
yt.'
,.4
'F.: i
:*1$l:
+-.-
l::{;l; -tL
CH -PTER 5 DETAILED PIAN RTcouMENDATIoNs
CTIAPTER 5
Detailed Plan Recommendations
This section ofthe Lionshead Master plan examines individual parcels and groups of parcelswithin the Lionshead study area, excluding the residential properties on theiouth side of Gorecreek. The intent of this chapter - 1ng t!. Master plan as a whole - is to identifr importantfilnctional relationships and visual objectives within the district and to propose a framework forthe long-term redevelopment of Lionshead. The document does not intend to limit or eliminateideas relating to specific parcels; any proposals consistent with this framework should beconsidered even if they are not anticipated in this document. The parcels uao."r566ir"i"-u."organized generally from east to west, staning with the civic hub on the eastern end of theparking structure.
5.1 Vail Civic Center
The proposed Vail civic- center complex is comprised of the Vail public library, DobsonIce Arena, and the existing charter bus parking iot at the eastern end ofthe Lionsheadpublic parking structure (see figure 5-r). At this time, municipal priorities for thedevelopment program on this site are uncertain, but potential altematives are described
below.
5.1.1 History of Vait Civic Center
The vail civic center site was acquired in the mid 1970's by the Town of vail,
after the Town Council rejected a proposal to build a civic center at Ford park. It
was determined that a civic center required a locrition adjacent to a major parking
structure with walking distance of both the Vail Village and Lionshead. Since the
acquisition ofthe property there have been several proposals considered and
rejected for the site. There have been three attempts to Uuita a convention center
on the charter bus lot site, one including a performing arts center. All three
proposals were rejected by the electorate. To date, no proposal has met the grand
vision for the completion of the Vail Civic Center.
5.1.2 Potential Development Scenarios
Uses suggested during the master planning process include a performing arts
center, a conference facility, a community recreation and service center
(potentially including the town govemment offices), a second ice rink connected
to Dobson Arena, and a high-tech convention center. Community participants
expressed a strong preference for a locally relevant development'serving ihe local
community as well as destination visitors. With a potentiai of 50,000 square feet
per floor, this site could accommodate a variety of uses, provided they are welt
designed and integrated. It will be the responsibility of tire Town of Vail Council
to decide upon the development program for use ofthe civic center site.
LlolgsHeeo RpppveropuENT MASTER PLAN PAGE 5-l
o
CTTnpTen 5 DETAILED PLAN RECoMMENDATIoNS
5.11 Ski Yard
Improvements recommended for the Lionshead ski yard are as follows:
5.11.1 Relationship to the Lionshead pedestrian Mall
There is a significant grade change between the ski yard and the retail mall. As
suggested in figure 5-15, a better grade transition could be designed at the north
edge of the ski yard to make it a more usable public space and to articulate a
strong linkage between the urban environment of the retail mall and the open
environment of the ski yard.
5.11.2 Skier Bridge
The existing skier bridge is a landmark but needs to be replaced. The new bridge
should be visually compatible with the desired character of Lionshead and wide
enough to separate skiers and pedestrians.
5.11.3 Connections
As depicted in flrgure 5-15, pedestrian path connections should be provided from
the north end of ski yard and the gondola terminal to the Gore Creek recreation
path, the skier bridge, and the southeast corner ofthe Lion Square Lodge
(location of the KB Ranch Restaurant).
5.11.4 Screening and Landscaping
Lion Square Lodge should be involved in planning enhancements in the ski yard.
Landscaping is desirable to screen the building at the west edge of the yard, but in
the central area would conflict with skier operations and the yard's potential to
function as a village green for community gathering and summer recreation.
5,12 Lion Square Lodge
The Lion Square Lodge, located at the end oflionshead Place, occupies two parcels.
The main parcel (phases 1,2, and 3) borders the ski yard and the Gore Creek recreation
path. The north parcel (phase 4) is located north ofthe Lionshead Plabe cul-de-sac.
Several issues arise because ofthis split configuration.
5.12.1 Tralfic Concerns
The primary concem of the Lion Square Lodge properfy owners is the existing
and potential volume of traffic ftoth lodging vehicles and delivery vehicles) that
accesses the Vail Associates core site. The current access into the core site passes
between Lion Square's main and north properties, resulting in an unsafe and
poorly defined connection between the buildings. When the Vail Associates core
site is redeveloped the mitigation of lodging and service vehicle impacts on the
Lion Square Lodge will be essential. Service vehicles should not be allowed to
stage outside of the core site or to cause visual, audible, or air pollution impacts.
Lroxsrreao RTDEVELopMENT MASTER pLAN PAGE 5-3I
Cserren 5 DsrA,u,eo pran RBcouMENDATToNs
SffifrfmffigrtoNcFAcE
FOTINILIL DIIIER COURTYATD
AND ARnIVAI FOIMT
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
*- -.: I
ffiE?;ffiffis.*^"
PEDSSTRIA}iAft $cLE coNNEnolti oFLrofisQuArfi LODCE .TXD Ug.:gQU*RE -\r*fl"
pED$STXITMSKTCLE co,lNECTrg$ Trl Rs n-conr
FOrErnl! NE$' OEVELOFrfE,rr pno!.tDfs "erict rr, grner
I+
uo}{SHE,tD pr,.tcE FEDesr Atr qJNNsCtXn{ lo sKl y,ttD
ftlxtt t't6 - Lot S!l!el'E ladFe
PAGE 5-32 LrowsupRo nr t
I
CsesreR 5 DETATLED pleu RecovuENDATroNS
5.12.2 Pedestrian Connection between the Main Building and the North Building
Potential redevelopment must address the need for a clear pedestrian connection
and defined vehicular conidor betrveen the main Lion Square Lodge property and
the north building on the other side oflionshead place (iee figure s-io).
5.12.3 Ski Yard pedestrian Access
The pedestrian path around the north end ofthe Lion Square Lodge shoutd be
upgraded to prbvide an attractive and safe pedestrian connection from Lionshead
Place into the ski yard. Because the path is close to the residential units in the
northem end ofthe Lion square building randscaping and other screening
methods will be needed. It is rpt recommended that this pedestrian access be
emphasized, but only that it be of better quality. The west Lionshead'pedestrian
portal,is more important as the western point of entry into the core area.
5.12.4 Potential I)evelopment and Redevelopment Scenarios
Lion Square Lodge is in need ofmajor exterior renovations or redevelopment.
Figure 5-16 presents a scenario by which the Lodge could add significant density,
enabling the creation of a strong architectural edge to Lionshead Place, a direct
connection between the main and north Lodge properties, and a screened parking
and arrival area. Another redevelopment scenario (not illustrated) entails
relocation of the existing core site access road to a new dedicated access on the
north side of Lion Square's no*h building. This would enable redevelopment to
connect the primary Lion Square Lodge building with its north property. Is*"t
associated with this scenario include the proximity of this new intersection to the
adjacent West Lionshead Circle intersection and the potential for noise and visual
irnpacts on the south side of the Montaneros properly.
5.13 The Marriott
With approximately 320 rooms, the Marriott is the only supply of hot beds in Lionshead.
The single largest structure in Lionshead, it is also very visiLle, especially from the west.
It is consequently a high priority renovation project, and all reasonable measures should
be taken by the Town of Vail to encourage and facilitate its enhancement. Specific issues
regarding this property are as follows:
5.13.1 Redevelopment or Development of the parking Structure
The best opportunity for new development on the Marriott property is the existing
parking structure (figure 5-17). Ifthis site is developed, attention shoutd be given
to the relationship between the developmen! Gore creek, the Gore creek
recreation path, and the west day lot. Vertical development should step back from
the recreation path, and there should be a clear separation (most likely a landscape
buffer) between the public space ofthe recreation path and the private space of
the residential units.
LToNsTTeeo RTDEVELoPMENT MASTER PLAN PAGE 5.33
CHAPTEREIGHT
DESIGI{
s
CuerreR 8 ARcHrrEcruaL DesrcN Guneu,Nps UPDATEDFEB 06
Cunpmn 8
Architectural Design Guidelines
8.1 Vision Statement
. The Lionshead neighborhood in Vail presents the opportunity to establish a dynamic and exciting
community within one of the premier resorts in the world. Lionshead's momtain location, proximity
to the ski slopes, and ample residential base evokes the vision of a truly special placq full of vitality
and intercst. This vision can be achieved through redevelopment of the community by addressing
site and architectural issues; and tluough consistent and effective transitions from existing to new
buildings.
The pedestrian experience ofthe public spaces within Lionshead is the most critical issue for
redevelopment. Many ofthe existing spaces are static and uninteresting, due to a prevailing gdd
organization and lack of animation and architectural coherency within the spaces. One of the most
effective ways to intensifr this orperience is through careful design of the architecture which defines
the public spaces. Visually dynamic variation at the pedesfian level can help avoid a monotonous
streetscape, and judicious use of ornamen! detail, artworlq and color can reflect individuality and
establish a variety of experience.
The architecture of Lionshead is envisioned as a unified composition ofbuildings and public spaces
based on the tirneless design principles of form, scale, and order, made responsive to their setting and
environment. It is not envisioned as a str.ict dictation of a specific "style" or "theme." Many existing
buildings within the community are built of monolithic concrete slabs and lack any sense of order or
personality. The new image for Lionshead should move towards the future-using historical alpine
references and Vail Village as antecedents. This design framework will allow individual property
ownen freedom of expression within the personalities of their buildings while establishing and
maintaining an overall uniffing character and image for the entire community. In addition, it is
paramount that the redevelopment effort address specific design considerations generated by the
location, climate, and surrounding environmen! such as addressing views, using indigenous building
materials, and reflecting the alpine heritage.
Designing in response to our regional heritage, adhering to a consistent architectural order, and
enhancing the public experience will enable Lionshead to define its own identity-.-+naking it a
distinct and special place not just within the context of Vail, but within kindred mountain
communities around the world.
LroNssrao RnoevnLopMENT Mesren PLaN Page 8-l
t:
I
{o
UPDATED SEFTOs
trg I- /.
8.2 Organization, Purpose and Scope
Crnprnn 8 Ancrurpc'ruar, DEsrcN GuDsuNBs I
I
I
I
fi
I
r.
I
I
i
i
f.
I
t.
f:
I
fi,
The organizatioir of the Lionshead Architectural Design Guidelines is based upon describing the
"big picture" of $re redevelopment effort firs! and then studying the more detaited aspects. Sections
8.1 and E.2 begid with the *big picture" and offer the'tision' for Lionshead, and provide
explanatory infoimation regarding organization, purpose, and scope. Section 8.3 contains special
provisiom for n$w and existing structure$, including redevelopment priorities, higgers, and
transition tools. ,This Section addresses how flexibility in the application ofthe Guidelines should be
applied to devel{pment applications under consideration by the Town's Boards and Commissions.
Section 8.4 contriins the Guidelines themselves, but begins first with the "big picture" of planning
considerations wfirich may overlap with the Lionshead Master Plan, Prospective developers and/or
designers should] shrdy this portion of Section E.4 carefully, to see what design criteria must be met if
their project occypies a special site relative to building roles, pedeshian sheets, or transition spaces.
The latter portioit of Section 8.4 deals with the architectural principtes of the Design Guidelines,
stading first witli overall issues such as building form and massing, thon moving into more detailed
issues such as diinensional criteria for architectural cornponents, materials, and colors. Section 8.5
provides a "quick glimpse" of the quantitative values outlined in the Guidelines.
The purpose of lthe Lionshead Architectural Design Guidelines (ADG) is to work io concert with the
Lionshead Mastfr Plan to enhance the existing experience within the communlty, improve the
quality of life, fcicus direction for fuhre grorrrrth, create visual harmony, and improve property values
for buqinesses at1d homeowners. This document constitutes a design philosophy for the community,
which when int{rated with the Lionshead Master Plan, helps to establish Lionshead as a cohereng
,llh4niF rrilla-- l."i+t , r-r- sd.--- ^t-l^^^ t, .r't ^-^ n .:,{^l:--- ^-^ :-r--l-r .- r!-^^r .L-dynamic village lwith a true'sense of place." These Guidelines are intended to direct the growth of
Page 8-2 LrousHpeo REoevnlopMENT Masten PleN
Cnerrnn 8 ARcrurecrual, DesrcN GuDer,rNss UPDATED FEB 06
the community through distinct levels of perception, from views ofthe neighborhood tom the
mountain and the highway, to perceptions within its pedeshian streets, to the detail level ofartistry
and omamentation on the structures thernselves.
f rg f .-' /'rrrroLr i,lir U.a,rtut thr, lirst ot.ltn:f, . tht con./|,vni,l', ttt lud..jxnaus.
Thc scope ofthe Design Guidelines includes all criteria related to the architectural design ofnew
and redevelopment projects within Lionshead, along with site and planning criteria which relate
. directly to architecture. Other site and planning criteria may be found in the Lionshead Master Plan,
and should be reviewed concurrently with these Guidelines. Structures which have been reviewed
and approved by regulatory agenoies for Lionshead prior to the endorsement date ofthis document
may pr€sent special circumstances with respect to the criteria cited within these Guidelines, and will
be handled per Section 8.3.
Ei New and Existing Structures
8.3.1 SpecialProvisions
While these Guidelinec offer a roadmap for the redevelopment of Lionshead" they are not
intended to limit ttre efforts of developers and/or desigrrers involved with new and existing
structures. It is understood that many of the buildings within the community or may be
unable to comply with some of the criteria described in the ApG. Many existing buildings,
for instance, may already exceed the height criteria identified. Some existing roof pitches
within the community may not meet the numerical values described. And many of'the
existing pedestrian streets may fall well short ofthe "ideal" proportions depicted. These and
similar issues will be handled oo a case-by-case basis, with determination of compliance
based upon whether the building meets the general intent ofthese Guidelines and the tenets
described herein.
Ltousneeo RSoEvBLopMENT MesrsR Pr,aN Page 8-3
UPDATED SEm 05 Crrerrsn 8 ARcIilTEcTUAL DEsIGN GuneLnns
Similar to existing shuctures, it is also understood that from time to time the Town may
determine that it is desirable to alford flexibility in strict application ofthe Guidelines to new
development projects. In these instances, the reviewing body shall rely upon the stated
review criteria for deviations to the Architectural Design Guidelines outlined in sub-section
8.3.3.A contained herein.
Proposed renovations oi additions which meet the general intent of the ADG will be offered
more latitude with respect to specific non-compliant items than those which shay ftom the
overall vision of Lionshead as described within-variances will be granted from the detail of
the Guidelines if the overall intent is met. In addition, any meaningful efforts to enhance
existing stuctur€s will be recognized as positive progress, and strict compliance with the
"lettert'of these Guidelines is not meant to discourage potential improvements.
Dwelopment Master Plans
Since many of thb shuctures within Lionshead are pre-existing, Development Master plans
are highly encouraged to define long-range goals for buildings within individual parcels.
These Plahs should be presented to the Design Review Board @RB) for review when
applyinC for initial building design approval, and should include information such as:
r Overall architectural 'aision" for all buildings within the site. Design strategies for maintaining consistent architectural language between
renovations and new construction within the site. Proposed phasing plans
Redevelopment Prioritization and (Triggers,
Consistent with Section 8.3.1 above, existing properties are encouraged to renovate and
rehabilitate, to the greatest extent possible, tbe exterior of their buildings according to the
param€ters of the ADG. It is recognized, however, that a single, complete, and
comprehensive exterior renovation may not be economically possible for all existing
structures, and incremental improvemerrts must be allowed. Having said this, the following
potential exterior improvements should be considered as priorities by both private property
owners and the Town of Vail. All reasonable efforts to encourage, provide incentives; and
facilitate these improvements should be made.
Renewed and expanded retail frontage. For properties fronting the Lionshead
retail mall and retail pedestrian streets, the renovalion and expansion ofthe ground
floor retail level is perhaps the most critical element in revitalizing the Lionshead
retail core.
Rqofs. As outlined in the ADG the roofscape of Lionshead is a critical component
in "knitting" together the built environment and providing visual cohesion to the
urban fabric of Lionshead.
Planning considerations. All buildings in Lionshead, both existing and new
development, should seek to fulfill the roles of landmarks, portals, turning points,
and other roles as outlined in the Master Plan,
f'
I
I
I
rrI
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
It.
f1
i
fr
I
8.3.3
criteria.
Page 8-4 Lrousupeo REpnvpr,opMENT Mesrpn PleN
CseprBn 8 ARcsrrpcruar. DBsrcN Gutoer,Nes UPDATED FEB 06
. Building surface treatment- walls, doors, windows, signag€, etc.. All other components ofthe architectural design guidelines.
A critical qqestion regarding the renovation of existing shucfures is when compliance with
the architectural design guidelines is "triggered'l or required. Regarding this, the following
guidelines should be considered:
r To the greatest extent possible, renovating properties should endeavor to make
significant and meaningful improvements to their properties as opposed to small,
insignificant improvements. This does not dlscount the importance ofany
improvement to a properties exterior.
r Any single incremental improvement to one building element will not necessarily
trigger compliance on all remaining building elements. However, any portion of the
building being improved should do so according to thp parameters ofthe
architectupal desigh guidelines, For example, ifa property applies to resurface the
walls oftheir building, this resurfacing should be done according to the ADG, but
will not in and of itselfalso require the replacement ofthe roof, or another major
modificatioru at the same time
c Any proposal to add significant volume or mass to a property may trigger fult
compliance to the Master Plan and Architectural Design Guidelines. Deviatibns
from this requirement shall require demonstration of compliance with the procedures
and review criteria outlined in Subsection E.3.3.A herein.
8.33,A Review Criteria for Deviations to the Architectural Design Guidelines for New
Development
Similar to the implementation policies of the ADG prescribed for existing structures, the
Town has determined that there may be instances where flexibility in requiring strict
compliance with the Guidelines for new development maybe in the best interest of the
community and the furtherance of the goals and objectives stated in the Lionshead
Redevelopmint Master Plan. That said, however, it is acknowledged that such instances are
rare and extraordinary, and shall be considered on a case-by-case basis. To aid in
determining when flexibility shall be afforded to new development fiom strict compliance
with the Guidelines, review criteria have been established. The degree ofdesign deviation
flexibility afforded to a development project shall bear proportionately to the extent of the
improvements proposed. For example, a development application that proposes the
construction ofa new structure which includes the demolition ofan existing structure or
adds sigoificant volume or mass to a property, shall more fully comply with the prescribed
Architectural Design Guidelines outlined in the master plan than an application which
propos€s a renovation or addition to an existing building
The following criteria shall be used by the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental
Commission and Design Review Board to determine if deviations to the Guidelines should
be granted:
It shall be the burden ofthe applicant to demonstrate to the saiidfaction ofthe Town of Vail
Planning & Environmental Commission following a recommendation from the Design
Review Board that:
Ltor.isHBen RsppvpLopMENT Mesren Plau Page 8-5
UPDATED SEPT 05 CneptrR 8 AncslrpcrueL Dnslctr Guper.rxes
r flhe request for design deviations are in compliance with the purposes ofthe zone
district; and
. Thp proposal which includes the design deviations is consistent with applicable
elements of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan; and
{he proposal which includes the design deviations does not have a significant
negative effect on the character of the neighborhood and
o The proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail
cgmprehensive plan; and
. The design deviation meets or exceeds the intent ofthe specific design standards as
ptescribed in Section 8.4; and,
. Aipublic benefit is achieved as a result ofthe desigq doviation; and,
. o Tlre design deviation furthers the goals, objectives and purposes as stated in Sections
2-1,2.5 and 8.2 of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. (Res. 18, Series of
2004)
8.3.4 Transition Tools
Transitio{r tools used to revitalize Lionshead are generally outlined in the specific
design criteria within these Guidelines, but are important enough to merit their own
subsections.
.i
I
I
I
t
ti
I
I
r''
1
1
t
t
f:
I
I
Page 8-6 Ltor{sHsen RpoBver,opMENT Masren PraN
o
CHayren 8 Ancurrpcruel Dpslcx GuroBr,rues UPDATED FEB 06
8.3.4.1 Build-to Lines
Build-to lines can be used to better define the existing public spaces, and to create
new ones. Delineation of these build-to lines is illustrated within the Master Plan.
When using these planning parameters to define public space, designers should give
careful consideration to the "ideal"
pedestrian street width-to-height
relationships illustrated in Section
8.4.1.3. Design of new building
edges within approved build-to
lines should be carefully evaluated
to make maximum use of the new
retail space, and how the added
building mass adds to the overall
pedestrian experience.
rtttril'1,'v.,i t'-'lonquiLs. ttctt .tLoliiuttts. tittor uncl rtnciot triu.
.ukl Qll,t,\ttt .' J.'|.]t||ut'
together within the community.
8.3.4.3 Door and Window Enhancements
8.3.4.2 Roof Replace-ments
The replacement of flat roofs with
pitched roofs can greatly improve
the image of Lionshead, and
roofing projects for existing
structures which incorporate the
criteria desqibed herein should be
considered whenever possible (see
criteria for existing roof compliance
in Section 8.4.2.7). Roofing
projects which are part ofplanned
building maintenance programs
should be used as opportunities to
add life and interest to buildings,
through the addition of pitched (or
mansard) roofs which meet the
form, pitch, material, and color
criteria identified within these
Guidelines. These retrofitted roofs
will greatly enhance the image of
the individual structures, and will
also act to tie dissimilar sfuctures
Enhancements to doors and fenestration can also serve to add vitality and
interest to otherwise uninspiring buildings. Doors at primary entries and
retail. frontages should be improved whenever possible, to encourag€
pedestrian interest and add to the vitality ofthe streetscape.
Etrslilt
LroNsHeep ReoevsLopMENT MAsren Prer'l Page 8-7
UPDATED SEPT 05 CHeprsn 8 AncurrBcruaL DesrcN Guropr,rNss
8.3.4.4
8.3.4.5
Modifications to overall building fenestration and window detailing (at
lintels, trim, jambs and sills) can be used to articulate the notion of base,
middle, and top on buildings, and to introduce mountain-friendly
windows to the community in terms of energy efficiency and views.
Building Finishes
Simple improvements to building finishes, such as covering drab,
monolithic precast concrete panels with textured stucco, or applying
stone veneer to tie buildings to their sites, can act as successful transition
tools, with relatively minimal costs. New finishes add to the aesthetic
appeal ofbuildings but can also be used to provide tangible, value-added
improvements to strucfures, such as installing exterior insulation and
finish systems (EIFS) to increase thermal performance of buildings, or
stone ven€er to protect lower levels from impact damage during snow
removal.
Detail and Ornamentation
And finally, the addition of omamentation and other detail appropriate to
Lionshead-used in conjunction with on€ or more of the previously
mentioned strategies----can greatly refine the quality of architecture
throughout the community. Well-crafted retail fronts will entice passers-
by into shops and other commercial areas, while careful detailing at eave
lines on new roofs will interlock roofs with building masses and tie new
roofs to the overall building language. Custom lintels over doors and
windows will also add visual interest, and detail on building finishes-
such as articulated bands on stucco or finely-crafted stone caps on stone
veneer-will add to the overall quality of structures within Lionshead.
LtoxsHEno RBoBver.opMENT Mesren PraN
I
t
r'
I
i
Page 8-8
CseprBR 8 Ancrurecruel DesrcN GuDrLnGs UPDATED FEB 06
8.4 Design Guidelines
8.4.1 PlanningConsiderations
8.4.1.1
8.4.1.2
Introduction
As noted earlier, most criteria governing site issues relative to Lionshead
redevelopment may be found in the Master Plan. However, some site
issues relate directly to the architecture of the community and are
therefore described within this section. Issues such as special "rol€s"
buildings may play within the community, comfortable proportions for
pedestrian streets, and the notion of domain are crucial concepts which
rely heavily on the architectural entities which define them, and are
therefore described in detail on the following pages.
Building "Roles'
Certain building sites within Lionshead occupy special locations within
the urban o'fabric," or'texture" of the community. To make best use of
these special sites and energize the pedestrian experience, buildings on
the sites will be required to meet the criteria that immediately follow, in
addition to the general criteria described throughout the rest ofthe
document. The locations ofthe special sites are identifred within the
Lionshead Master Plan. This section outlines specific architectural
requirements for buildings which occupy these critical sites, based upon
the types of buildings, or building "roles" most appropriate to the sites,
including portals, edge definers, space definers, and landmarks.
Portals
Portals act as the "front doors" to communities or urban spaces and
therefore often present the first images to pedestrians. Buildings which
are located.on key sites need to act as inviting and "friendly" portals to or
within Lionshead. Stand-alone structures can act as portals through
appropriately-scaled, large openings and significant mass, while multiple
structures can accomplish this through proper siting and relationship to
one another. Human scale can be achieved with portals by introducing
horizontal architectural components which relate to the sunounding
context, such as retail frontage heights and other critical eave heights.
This can also be achieved through careful design of detail which is
considerate ofthe human form; that is, detail which relates to dimensions
people are most comfortable with, such as railing heights, head heights,
story heights, and similar proportions. Portals within Lionshead can be
effective ifthey present enough mass
LroNSueen REosvet,opMENT MesreR Preu Page 8-9
o
UPDATED SEPT 05 Crnprnn 8 AncHrrecruel Desrclq GuDer,Nss
to enclose the spaces they are
defining, with enough open
area to present the sense of
entry needed for a community
of its size and complexity.
They may serve additional
functions as well, such as
living areas, bridges, or
enclosed connectors, which can
help to further animate the
portals and provide additional
income-generating space.
!\t,\.i ll'i tttt ltondls. Jtltt,tl tut ltalp uL.hicr.c
Edge Definers
Whereas portals act as the "front doors" to urban comrnunities, edge-
, defining buildings act as the "exterior walls" for communities. Where the
edges of Lionshead meet areas exterior to the community such as Vail
Village, the Core Creek Conidor, and the highway, buildings must
present appropriately-scaled, welldefined edges to contain Lionshead or
act as distinct transition zones from one neishborhood to the next. The
form, massing, and
height guidelines
identified in Sections
8.4.2-2 and, 8.4.2.3 will
direct much of the
design ofthese edges,
but additional
considerations such as
building siting, scale,
and architectural image
should be taken into
account as well.
i,
Fig ll-h Bttildin{ qfttss Lstd to ilEJi e tttlgt.
Page 8-10 LtoNsspeo ReoevplopMENT Mesren Pleu
Cnerren 8 AtcurrBcruel DBsrcN Gurosr,rNns UPDATED FEB 06
Building siting shoutd allow for openings to occur between structures
which make up the community edge, to en€ourage passers-by to take
inviting glimpses inside Lionshead. In addition, buildings along edges
shotitd be scaled according to nearby structures. Architectural language
should be used to ofler a consistent image of Lionshead from the
outside-proportions of buildings and the ways in which they are detailed
need to reflect the overall image found within the community, and
"loud," self-promoting buildings which reference only themselves should
be avoided.
Public Space Definerc
To continue the analogy,
sfiuctures which define
public space act as the
"interior walls" of
Lionshead. These buildings
should address public spaces
with their primary facades,
and should not "turn their
backs" to the spaces.
Buildings which define
public space should have
distinct wall planes, with
relatively minor plan and
elevation offsets. Building
footprints which are basEd
upon rigid grid layouts
should be avoided; instea4
designers are encouraged to develop more inviting, irregular public
spaces which offer surprises to travelers as they proceed through
Lionshead. Definition of the corners of public spaces is critical to contain
those spaces, and can be accomplished through significant massing at the
corners. In addition, important heights such as tops ofshopfronts and
prominent eave lines should be reinforced on buildings which define
public space, because they encourage the eye to follow the "walls" ofthe
public space around its perimeter, thereby strengthening the sense of
enclosure.
Landnurks
A landmark provides a sense of orientation for the community, and
reinforces its "sense of place" or image. As such, it must be visible from
key locations within the community, such as portals and major public
spaces, and must offer an image consistent with Lionshead. As
lig J" -: ( rzruurg -rri ls ttound sPttce
LroNsHpap RBoevelopMENT Mnsren Pleu Page 8-ll
UPDATED SEPT 05 Cuesrpn 8 Ancsnecruel Desrcw GuDsuNes
!
I
t"
I
a unique architecfural element, a landmark
should be designed to clearly stand out
from the rest ofthe community, while still
presenting a consistent design language.
Care should be taken to provide a clear
hierarchy between the village landmark and
other, secondary landmarks. Landmarks
are most successful when they serve special
functions such as bell towers, clock towers,
monuments, or public art, rather than being
self-serving. Furthermore, they should be
carefully scaled to the buildings adjacent to
them, as well as to the overall scale of the
urban village.
lircruc .'l I.ionsllzo
Pedestrian Streets
Widt h-to-Heig ht Relatio ns h ips
lRatios of width to height at pedestrian streets and other outdoor spaces
pre crucial to the success of those spaces. While ideas of comfortable,
inviting scale differ greatly between cultures and individuals, for the
purposes of these Guidelines, European mountain antecedents--
lntegrated with our Colorado resort location---trave been used as the basis
for determining "comfort." With this h mind, pedeshian streets shall be
flesigned with cross-sections exhibiting l;ll2to l:1 % width-to-height
ratios.
.A.pproved cross-sections for pedestrian sheets will be calculated using the
fiearest walls whiqh line the streets. Walls which are 16' high or less (to
the eave) from ground level will not be considered as part of width and
tieight calculations. Walls greater than 16' high (to the eave), however,
iptemrpt pedestrian site lines from sheet level, and offer a strong sense of
0nclosure for pedestrians. Ther€fore, these walls wil/ be included as part
df street width and height calculations. The sketches shown in this
sbction illustrate.some examples of acceptable ratios, using both "shorf'
ahd "tall" walls.
I
t
.
8.4.13
I
tl
I
I
I
l
Page 8-12 LroNsHeeo REDEVELopMENT MesrpR Pr"aN
CHApTER 8 ARcHrrEcruAL DEsrcN GuDeLrNEs UPDATED FEB 06
.l(i'Widrh
f r.q.v"9 ; l.) rutrot) higlt w lst.Iig.s-/ii I ll ] n:ttit,l lu.t:h ']rellsr.
The intent of the width-to-height principles is to direct the development
ofcomfortable, human-scaled Bedestrian streets. However, all other
criteria identified within the Lionshead Master Plan and the rest ofthis
document, such as build-to lines, form and massing criteri4 and height
restrictions, take precedence over the ratios identified herein. Within
these parameters, exceptions to the listed ratios may be considered if the
intent has been met.
['-iy x- I I . (',ttttiottlhb lnlrs rttn lron l'uhln u, Setr-
ljuhl/(' ,l.rnuirs I rtft lrt)ttl
Pablic and Pfivate Domain
Proper understanding of the
notion ofpublic and private
domain presents the
opportunity to introduce
another level of pedestrian
movement through
Lionshead----one in which
haffic flows laterally across
outdoor spaces, rather thar.
simply along them. This
lateral flow also reinforces
the concept ofweaving the
sides ofoutdoor spaces
together, through
psychological, visual, and
LroNsneen RepevuopMENT Mesrpn Preu Page 8-13
o
UPDATED SEPT 05 CneprnR 8 AncHrrscruel DesrcN GuDer,rNEs
physical ties.
Specific levels of domain can
range from public, semi-
public, semi-private, to
private. Designed properly,
the varying relationships
between these levels can act
to strengthen the ties within a
village, and add to the spatial
interest--rcr quality level-of
the outdoor spaces. These
additional "layers" of space
4long public ways add
excitement and vitality by
presenting varying strategies of design and detailing to pedestrians as
they travel through the layers from public to private space, or vice-versa.
In addition, they provide comforAble transition spaces from public to
private, rather than presenting an abrupt experience from one domain to
the next. However, poor design of domain and the ways in which the
diflerent levels interact can lead to psychological, visual, and physical
segregation of the levels, leading in turn to empty a4d monotonous public
spaces rather than active and interesting ones.
The aim ofthese Guidelines is to reinforce the concept of transparency
between pubtic and semi-public, or street and shop. Segregation of these
levels of domain shatl be avoided whenever possible. To this end,
colonnades, arcades, porticos, and other covered ways along shopfronts
shall be designed to invite-raJher than repel-pedestrian traffic. This
may be accomplished through thoughtful design of visual and artistic
elements such as signage, window displays, shopfront lighting, and the
like, and physical elements such as columns, planters, and artwork. As
visual and physical baniers are removed, psychological ones will follow
suit. Design of street-edge sidewalk cafes, patios, and colonnades are
described in Section 8.4.1.4 of this document.
Frg ,t- /-'. .lruarles- /r.rggics. trn(i ttt i,ilrr. (,r,rias
-thouizl rcmain n'{ns|il.rc! l') rd(lc-$(r.t.Jrt llrcdts.
t
l
Page 8-14 LroNsHBao RponvstopMENT MAsTER Plehr
Cueprpn 8 ARcHrrEcruAL DEsrcN Guroer,Nss UPDATED FEB 06
8.4.1.4 Trunsition Spaces
Generul
For the purposes ofthese Guidelines, tansition spaces are defined as the
architectural components which line pedestrian sfieets and other public
spaces. With this in mind, all structures which form transition spaces
shall be designed with the transparency and other characteristics
described earlier in this document along with the dimensional criteria to
follow. The intent is to create a layer of frontage with interest and life,
rather than the typical homogeneous shopping center so common today.
To this end, great latitude is permitted for the design oftransition spaces.
Outdoor Dining/
Sidewalk Cafes
Semi-public arbas
such as outdoor
dining and sidewalk
cafes offerthe
opportunity to
engage pedestrians
with dining
activities and serve
to animate the
public spaces with
the presence of
people. As
'butdoor rooms"
themselves, these
types ofspaces
create a high level
oftransparenca
between public and semi-public domains. Minor grade changes ean
actually be very elfective in these areas, and planter walls, guardrails, and
th€ like can act to define the spaces and add another level ofdetail to the
public ways. However, the subtle awareness and interaction of people
from the public spaces with people inside the dining areas or cafes'is
important, and therefore severe physical or visual barriers should be
minim ized whenever possible.
/'l.C 8- /-t a)ntdou' rnons ,rl4ir rr.r onlthxr utng unti
( {,/a,J (.r,| (,&(.l.qc tltt lwLl!lri t.
LroNsspeD ReorveropMENT Masren PLeN Page 8-15
UPDATED SEIrT 05 CHerrnn 8 Ancurrncruer, DesrcN GuropI,Nes
Streetfront Patios, Coufiards, snd Gadens
As semi-private spaces, patios, courtyards, and gardens which serve
hotels, residences, and other private uses must maintain the solitude for
which they were designed, while at the same time allowing for sorne
interaction between resident or hotel guest and the pedestrian traveler. [n
addition, as components which contribute to the fabric of public spaces,
patios, courtyards, and gardens with street frontage must work in concert
with the street and add to its dynamic nature, through careful attention to'scale,
materials, and detailing.
These semi-private amenities should be scaled small enough to avoid
competing with significant public spaces, to maintain the hierarchy of the
outdoor rooms, and make clear distinction between the public, semi-
public, and semi-private domains. Moreover, the materials which define
the ground plane (such as pavers or tiles), the walls ofthe space (such as
stucco or wood), and the ceiling of the space (such as wood trellises),
must work in harmony with the architectural language of the building
itself, and with the materials used along the street fiontage. Details used
to articulate these areas can also contribute to the overall imaee of the
public space and reinforce to its "sense ofplace."
Co lo nnades, Lo gg ias, and Arcades
Architectural features such as colonnailes or loggias--comprised of
columns supporting one edge of a roof and often called arcades-offer
yet another way to provide successful transitions from public space to
semi-public space. To maintain transparency, however, the components
which make up these features-such as columns, piers, and planter
walls--should be designed to allow unencumbered pedestrian movement
around and through them. A minimum clear space of 6'shall be kept
between building faces and streetfront columns, piers, and planter walls.
This clear space will encourage two-way circulation along retail fronts,
and foster comfortable mov€mont. In additioq the ratio of solid mass
(expressed by the column or pier width) to open area (expressed by the
widths of the openings between the columns or piers) should be designed
so it does not act as a barrier which prevents pedestrians from haveling
along or through the colonnade. Changes in ground plane between public
spaces and colonnades, loggias, and atria can also hinder freedom of
pedestrian movement, and should therefore be generally limited to 12" or
less. The overall intent of this section is to direct the careful design of
architectural entities so they do not act as barriers between public spaces
and the buildings those spaces serve. Within these principles,
t'
Page 8-16 LroNsueeo ReoevrropMrNT Mesrnn Pr,eN
Cnepren 8 AncrnrscrueL DBslctt Gutopt nres UPDATED FEB 06
other factors such as elegant proportions, appropriate scale, and
accessibility must also be considered.
8,4,2 Architecture
8.4.2,1 Introduction
The architectural portion of these Guidelines is intended to provide a
unified, conceptual framework using historical alpine references. It is
imperative that the redevelopment effort address specific architectural
design considerations generated by the location, climate, and surrounding
environment-such as addressing views, using indigenous building
materials, and reflecting the alpine heritage. However, within this
framework, the architectural language of buildings within Lionshead
should strive to reinterpret its heritage and look to the fufure, instead of
simply mimicking the past.
Building Form and Massing
Building form and massing-as design determinants----are especially
critical to the success oflionshead as an interesting, inviting resort. The
forms of buildings and the ways in which they are massed offer
opportunities to present a comfortable, pedestrian scale to the Lionshead
traveler, and to strengthen the continuity ofthe streetscape throughout.
Other vital corridors within Lionshead which are not along primary
pedestrian/retail routes-such as the Gore Creek Coridor-tan also
benefit from well-designed massing which relates to the scale of those
conidors. Form and massing act to marry a building to its site, whether
the site is part of a paved plaza or sits within natural topography, and
serve to "break down" the scale of the village fabric when viewed from
the ski hill.
The overall design strategy ofbuilding form and massing shall relate to
the horizontal organization found within Lionshead (such as shopfront
heights, important floor lines, and critical eave lines), and to the planning
considerations outlined in the Lionshead Master Plan (such as build-to
lines, sun pockets, and view corridors). The intent ofthis section is to
guide the creation of a village which is appropriately scaled through the
use of segmented forms and masses. The underlying fabric shall be
constructed ofstructures which rise out ofthe ground gradually, rather
than being vertical blocks set on the ground plane. At the pedestrian
scale. the street level should be
LtoNsHee,o ReosvnLopMENT Mlsrpn PraN Page 8-17
o
UPDATED SEPT 05 CnnprBn 8 AncHtrecruer Desrcx GuDer,n+ss
8.4.2.3
dynamic and interesting, by varying forms and masses at the bases of
buildings. These building "skirts" should not be uniform one- or two-
story masses, but rather fragmented forms which offer interest and
diversity.
Building Height
General
The following building height and massing criteria shall appty to the
Lionshead Master Plan study area, excluding all residential properties
south of Gore Creek.
Primary Retail Pedestrian Frontfages
On any property edge fronting a retail pedestrian street or mall (see site
design guidelines for definition and locations), at least 50% ofa building
face shall have a maximum 16' initial eave height, at which point that
face must step back a minimum of l2'. The remaining percentage of
building face may have a maximum 36' initial eave height, at which point
the building face shall step back a minimum of l2'. Eave height is
defined as the distance from finished grade tq the initial primary eave of
the structure. Gable faces of buildings are also measured to their eaves,
excluding the actual wall area which comprises the gable. The intent of
this retaiVpedestrian street requirement is to present a dynamic,
fragmented streetfront to outdoor spaces, ratherthan uniform blocks of
building mass (see Section 8.4.2.2).
I rq
^-
l J .lt ratutl.
.,,((./a'ia'r.i.! strcr'A.,/rc
trtltnl t, lt) h)fttl
r!{tIt'tItJ tt..'tt-
lt'1, a. r,\rt\ 11, d ri
-a () - t<1.\Ittiut,t u\'l
i'r'Nlnt dhi i) ir"'!r
/t lt {.r {
I
I[;
Page 8-18 LtoNsuEeo REDEvELopMENT Mesren Pr,eu
CHerrsR 8 Ancnrrpc"runl Desrcx GuDer,Nrs UPDATED FEB 06
Shi Yard and Open Space Frontages
This paragraph applies to the portion ofany property not meeting the
criteria ofthe Primary Retail Pedestrian Frontages section above, and
fronting on the ski yard or the Gore Creek corridor. Due to the unique
and highly visible nature ofthese areas, building faces fronting them shall
be limited to maximum initial eave heights of 48', at which point those
faces shall step back a minimum of 12'.
It is critical to note that the 48' maximum initial eave height does not
.allow for an unarticulated flat building face from grade to 48'. The
horizontal and vertical maximum unbroken building face requirernents, as
well as allother guidelines contained in this chapter and the Master Plan,
shall apply.
Remtining B uilding Fruntage
Building faces that do not meet the special site criteria of the sections
above may have a maximum initial eave height of 60', at whioh point
those faces must step back a minimum of l2'. To the extent possible, all
new and redeveloped buildings in Lionshead should avoid "tuming their
backs" on other buildings or important pedestrian corridors. However, it
must be acknowledged that very few buildings have prime frontage on all
sides and almost all buildings will have different programmatic
requirements and visual characteristics on their different faces. Toward
that end, a building's greatest vertical mass and "back of house" funotions
should occur on the frontage with the least volume of pedestrian traffic.
In addition, components of a building with the greatest vertical mass
should be oriented north-south to minimize ttre blockage of southern
views and sunlight.
It is critical to note that the 60' maximum initial eave height does not
allow for an unarticulated, flat buitding face from grade to 60'. The
horizontal and vertical maximum unbroken building face requirements,
all other guidelines contained in this chapter and the Master Plan, and
DRB review and approval, shall still apply.
l;l/all S urface Criteria
Notwithstanding the previous height and setback requirements, there shall
be no vertical wall face greater than 35' on a building without a
secondary horizontal step in the building face (the horizontal step may be
a cantilever or a setback). This requirement is intended to prevent large,
unbroken planes in the middles of building faees, to further
LroNsHeRo Rrouvpr,opMENT MesrBn PI"aN Page 8-19
UPDATED SEPTO5 CseprBn 8 Ancnrrecrunr, DesrcN Gurobrrbles
mitigate the visual impact of building height, and to provide for higher
qualrty and more interesting articulation of structures. While many
instances will necessitate a distance of at least 24" for this movement, it
shall be incumbent upon the developer to demonstrate that the intent of
this requirement has been met.
Abs o I we Maximum Heig hts
Absolute Maximum Height is defined aS the vertical distance from
existing, finished or interfolated gmde - whichever is more restrictive -
to the ridge of the nearest primary roof form to that grade. With this in
mind, the Average Maximum Height of any building shall not exceed 7l
ft. Notwithstanding the notion of Average Maximum Height, the
Absolute Maximum Height of any building shall not exceed 82.5 ft.
Within any building footprint, height shall be measured vertically from
ithe ridgeline ofthe primary roofform on a proposed or existing roofto
jthe interpolated or existing grade directly below said point on a proposed
ior existing roofto the imaginary plane oreated by the interpolated grades
,(see
Figure 8-l5a+)
palculatian of Average Maximum Height
flhe intent of implementing an Average Maximum Height for buildings is
to create movement and variety in the ridgelines and roof forms in
f,ionshead. Toward that en4 the Average Maximum Height ofa building
fhall be calculated based upon the linear footage ofridgeline along
ftimary roof forms. Any amount of primary roof form ridgeline that
gxceeds 71 ft. must be offset by at least an equal amount ofprimary roof
{orm ridgeline falling below 7l ft., with the distance below 7l ft.
(quivalent to or greater than the distance exceeding 71 ft. The average
lalculation shall be based on the aggregate linear footage ofprimary roof
fprms across an entire structure, not separate individual roofforms (see
Figure 8-l5c)
l
y'vemge Maximum Height Calculqtion
Average
Marimum
Ifeight = [Prlnrcy niage kngtlr (A) X Average Height of Ridge (AI + lPdma{y Ridge
i lcngth (B) X Av€rage Height of Ridge @)J +[Prinary Ridgc Length (C) X Average
Height of Ridge (C[ +[. . .]
[Primuy Ridge Length (A) + Prtunary Ridge L,ength @) + Primary Ridge kngth
(c)+(......r
t
t.
'r'
I
I
t-'
Il.
I'I
I
I
t'
I
t
t:I
[,
t
i
I
i
r"It[;
Ir
f'
L.
Page 8-20 LTONSUnan REDEvELoPMENT MesrBn PI,aN
Cnnprnn 8 AncrurscrueL Desrcx Guro*rNes UPDATED FEB 06
A dd it io n a I Re q u i r e me nts/Exc ep t io ns
All buildings, regardless of permitted building heights and massing
principles, shall conform to all estiblished Public View Corridors (see
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan). Speoial "landmark" building
elements, such as chimneys, tow€rs, or other unique architecfural forms,
may exceed the Absolute Maximum Height, subject to approval by the
reviewing board. This provision is intended to provide for architectural
creativityand quality of building form, and shall not be used as a means
or circumventing the intent ofthe building height limitations. In addition,
regardless of final building heighg buildings shall avoid monotonous,
unbroken ridge lines, and shall provide visual interest through the use
varied peak heighps, roofforms, gables, and other appropriate
architectural techniques. (Res 8, Series of2003)
Lloussenn RBnEvnlopMENT MesreR Pr-eN Page 8-21
o _
Cnepren 8 Ancrutpcruat Drstcx Gulnelrves
a
UPDATED SEPT 05
qlt!l
F'
^ar
s
FIE
I\t
.l
T
if
t'! Z
E
PageS-22 LToNs gpno RepBvnI"oPMENT MnSreR PI,aN
o
CHeprsn 8 AncrurpcrueL DnsrcN Guortwns
o
UPDATEDFEB 06
2z
,s
a &,.Ic)o
T&
n\'s!(
I€
.5
PIot9E\
:,5
oI
:"J5n
6z
tii
'ii
i(
-----+--l
*-'="-r'--{
|
I ----l
lb - tl--- --
-*: +:j+lg
^l !"j.fi
.l,/:r
I
I
I
I
) HE I3t I I
__ Ht . r-l__
-lit;; -:::-_J
I?,trri{
aA
TF;
$s
az
fid
2e*
Ltonsnpeo ReneveLopMENT Mlsren PreN PageS-23
UPDATED SETT 05
fr
(l
e
I'z
.i t1
FgJ
fiI
C 'rir:l
CHapryen 8 AncHTrecTUAL DesTcN GUIDELINES
+-
LrotrsHseo RnnevBlopMENT Mn sren PLIN
s
€
5
s
|lq
€s
E
I
E
clt;tfp\
iIx;'
at
2
Et
3
A{
o
3
,l!
sI
z
x
6
E
o
2
*
€
' Page 8-24
o
CgaprBn 8 AncsnecrueL DBstcu GutopLmes UPDATED FEB 06
8.4.2.4 Exterior Walls
General
Exterior walls within Lionshead shatl be designed with clear definition of
base, middle. and 19p. This organizing principle will weave the separate
pieces of the community into a consistent fabric. The tripartite strategy of
base, middle, and top will establish key datums, or special horizontal
layers, within the community which reinforce the form, massing and
height guidelines
described earlier. To this
end, the three-part
definition of buildings
shall relate directly to
organizing principles
such as existing datums,
architectural elements
such as storefront
colonnades and awnings
(where applicable), and
massing strategies such
as building setbacks and
maximum heights. This
strategy can relate to
form and massing
principles through the
development of street-
level setbacks defining the bases ofbuildings where appropriate, and
minor setbacks relating to the middles and tops of buildings.
The bases of buitdings should be visually dynamic to heighten the
pedestrian expeiience. In addition, their interface with the topography of
the site is crucial, as they act as the fiadsition zones between man-made
structures and natural grade. Visual dynamics at street level are most
effectively accomplished through the inhoduction of secondary forms, .
materials, colors and detailing.
. I"iu l-!h ( ltor delinttttttt ry harc. rnilcllt. tolt
LtoNsHeap RenevsLopMENT MesrBn PlRr.l Page 8-25
UPDATED SEPT 05 CrnptnR 8 AncHttecruer. DEsrcN Gutorln'ies
,f rrr '\.1_ /r'trrrtrrrt tttris p'tl t,r rL,ti,*. i.ur' rrrrrlr1lr. lrrl, di. r;lrrrr! rr!-i;j/i1rrr
However, the use of indigenous
materials at the primary elements (see
following sections for definitions) is
critical in tying buildings to their sites.
Rhythm and order should be
introduced to guide the traveler
through the streetscape, and offer an
enhanced sense ofmovement through
Lionshead. To reinforce this intent
street-level walls shall not span more
than 30 feet horizontally without
significantly varying at least 2 of the
following 5 characteristics:
I rt,ti-/A- lirrrl.r y,,,,1,1,,.r.rnI i'1, 11tt1!
It) r'alutu.I i:trttitirr:,Js ra, trcir :r_t{c-r.
Massing or Height
Material, Fenestration, or Color
I'
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
I
t'
a
a
l-rrsfi|tf
Page 8-26 Ltor.rsHEA.o REDEVELopMENT MnsrnR PreN
o
Cneyren 8 AncurrecrueI, DestcN Gutper,nms UPDATED FEB 06
When massing or height are varie4 buildings with street-level walls may
vary material, fenestration, or color to meet the 3O-foot span requirement;
however, if massing or height are not varied within 30 feet, material,
fenestration, azd color must be varied.
I.I v.:tt (' lnt\k:ttlt ,tud slrtl4rrtttt \r L,tt.t
Existing buitdings may disregard the 30'-mancimum horizontal wall
guideline iftheir structural bays or other organizing elements exceed 30',
provided that the distance over 30' falls within reasonable limits. An
existing building with 36' structural bays, for instance, is not required to
fiuther divide those bays; however, an existing building with 48'
structural bays may be required to divide those bays into 24' sections,
depending upon the nature ofthe pedestrian street frontage.
The middles of buildings within Lionshead shall read as "quiet" masses
when compared to building bases and roofs, and should act as a unifying
background throughout the community. This should be done through the
use of simple materials, such as stucco, and more consistent, repetitive
fenestration and detailing (see Sections 8.4.2.5 and 8.4.2.9). Building
middles should not be designed as less important, banal elements, but
rather as elements which present interest and articulation through subtle
detailing-through fenestration, shutterc, trim, and the like-instead of
massing. The tops of walls shall be designed to comfortably engage their
pitched roofs, without the abrupt changes in form and massing so
commonly found in struotures with primarily flat roofs. Walls should
also be used to
ma\ it hcisht ,\ '
LTOT{sHeeo REDEvELoPMENT Masrun PIaN PageS-27
o
UPDATED SEPT 05 CHnpren 8 AacHrrecruel DesrcN Guropr,rNp,s
rr
'
(
I
!
visually reduce roof heights, through the careful design of lowered plate
heights and integrated dormers, which help to merge wall planes with
roof forms and interlock building masses with roof masses.
The tops of buildings shall be capped with well-proportioned, pitched
roofs, acting as the uppermost uniffing image within the architectural
fabric of Lionshead. Roofs viewed from pedestrian streets should nearly
disappear from view as travelers approach, due to their pitches relative to
ground-level sightlines. However, viewed from a distance, roof forms
within Lionshead should offer a consistent roofscape to the observer
within the community or on the mountain adjacent to it. Guidelines
which direct the design of the roofscape are described in Section 8.4.2.7.
Materials (General)
As mentioned earlier, building materials should be carefully selected to
recall the heritage ofour alpine antecedents, yet look forward to the
vision of Lionshead as a modem resort community. The specific
requirements and limited palette of major building materials described
herein are intended to reinforce the visual harmony envisioned for the
community and act as additional uni$ing thread for the resort.
Materials used at primary building elements--defined as those which
exceed 500 square feet (SF) in wall surface area-shall recall and relate
to the indigenous materials ofthe area and enhance the sense ofour
Colorado mountain resort heritage. They are described below according
to their most appropriate locations within the tripartite order of individual
structures. Secondary building elements, or those which cover an area of
500 SF or less, may be comprised of varying materials to add design
flexibility, encourage individual expression, and enhance visual interest-
They are not specifically listed within these Guidelines, but may include
materials such as painted steel, canvas and similar textiles, colored unit
masonry, and the like. Within this framework, creative use of materials is
encouraged, but "patchwork" designs of inconsistent material locations or
patterns should be avoided. All secondary building elements will be
approved at the discretion of the reviewing body.
Base Matefials
Materials selected for the bases of buildings must balance the
transparency required at retail shopfronts with the strong, anchoring
I
f'
Page 8-28 LtottsHBao RnoevrropMENT Mesren Pr,nN
CHagreR8 ARcgtrBctuer, DBstcttGutoELINES UpDArEDFEBo6
elements needed to tie buildings to their sites. That is, they must
successfully integrate the notions of mass wall and frame wall. In
addition, they should offer both large- and small-scale texture at the
ground plane, to add varying levels ofinterest and heighten the pedestrian
experience. With this in mind, building bases shall be primarily
constructed of individual pieces or unit materials such as stone veneer.
When using stone, veneers should be selected which lend authenticity to
mass walls-thin veneers or lhose which appear as mere surface applique
should be avoided. Battering may be used as an additional-but
optional--design tool to visually strengthen the bases of structures. As
mentioned earlier, secondary elements within building bases may
incorporate accent rnaterials, but these materials should be carefully
selected to act in concert with the rest ofthe architecture. Shopfronts and
other special streetlevel amenities have the most latitude with respect to
material selection, but can be very successful if constructed of hand-
crafted, durable materials. These types of materials can hold up to the
careful scrutiny of the streetlevel observer, along with the physical abuse
common to public ways. Acceptable accent materials include-but are
not limited trwood, wrought iron, forged or formed metals, and etched
glass.
Middle ll/all Materials
The middles of buildings shall be constructed of neutral field materials
such as true stucco,.ElFS, or wood. These types of materials help to
establish the "quief'or "background" vertical surfaces necessary at the
major wall planes which typically make up the bulk of structures. In
addition, they offer an interesting difference between the dynamic nature
of building bases and the more repetitive, subtle pattems ofbuilding
walls above street level. Materials such as stucco Fhould be designed as
an expression of mass, rather than infill between structural members.
Where building walls meet roofs, materials which successfirlly integrate
the tops of buildings to their middles, such as wood in the form of
bpckets, rafter tails, and the like, are most effective.
Approved materials for use on building roofs are described in Section
8.4.2.7 of these Guidelines.
Colors
Building colors for struoturas within Lionshead should be chosen to blend
structures with the mountain environment, while offering visual and
psychological warmth to observers. To this end earth tones and other
low-intensity colors derived directly from the sunounding mountains
should be used on primary building elements, defined as those which
Lrolsunen REDEVELopMENT Mesrpn PlaN PageS-29
o
CHepren 8 Ancurrncruel DpsrcN GuroelNesUPDATED SEm 05
cover more than 500 SF. Earth tones include hues such as oflwhites,
beiges, tans, and light grays, introduced in shades slightly darker than
their natural counterparts. Colors inherent to the materials used, such as
natural stones and naturally-weathering woods, generally offer the hues
and textures most desirable within Lionshead, and such materials should
not be painted. However, integrally-colored concrete, stucco, and semi-
transparent.wood stains are acceptable as well. In an effort to limit the
palette ofcolors used on buildings and avoid the "patchwork" effect, no
more than three colors should be used on primary building elements.
Secondary building elements (500 SF or less in area) may be clad in
accent colors to add visual interest to the overall streetscape. They
should act as highlighting elements at storefronts, primary entries, and
signage, and are most appropriate at lower levels to engage pedestrian
interest. Upper levels, in an effort to act as the more "quiet" fabric of
Lionshead, should avoid brighter colors and remain true to the earth tones
listed above. When used, accent colors should reflect the natural
mountain environment of Lionshead, with golds, oranges, reds, and
shades ofgreen, blue, and purple used most often. Colors foreign to the
mountain settine should be avoided.
['Ii
E.4.2.5
I
Trim i
Trim colors, generally used on elements to eiptess structure, door and
window openings, significant floor lines, fascias, and the like, shall act in I
concert with field and accent colors. This is most effectively i' .
accomplished through the selection ofdeep or vibrant colors having the
same or similar hues, but using different shades or tints. At street level,
accent colors may be used on trim to express storefronts and reinforce the t
rhythm of the streetscape.
Exterior Doors and Windows
General
In the tradition of mountain antecedents, openings for exterior doors and
windows in buildings within the Lionshead community shall be heated as
recessed elements in mass walls of stone, concrete, or stucco, rather than
flush surfaces on them. Within frame walls, they shall be expressed as
infill material between structural members. and
t,
I
t.
Page 8-30 Lror.isHeao Rpopvnr,opMENT MasteR PraN
CHesren 8 Ancrnrecruel Desrcr.r GUTDELTNES UPDATED FEB 06
recessed from those members. This treatment lends itself to the image of
shictures comprised of significant mass or structure, instead of curtain
walls clad over lightweight frames. Given this general approach,
however, door and window sizes, shapes, types, materials, and colors
should relate to the tripartite order established through development of
base, middle, and top.
Exterior Door Sizes, Shapes, ond
Types
Door sizes should be appropriate to
their materials, with rustic, "heavy"
doors generally used in stone or
concrete to accentuate mass, and
glazed, "light" doors used in field
materials such as sfucco and wood
siding, or at window wall assemblies
(see couimercial front exceptions to
follow in this Section). Entry doors
located along retail streets and other
public ways offer the first true
glimpse of buildings when
/-r.e,\-.'rt. l't n lo<n't <tt t'tkttl apprOaChed frOm thOSe SpaCeS, and
sl'llpt siu,uki L'\r,r'.r.(./.:forl {r,r/ ShOUld thefefOfe be designed WithL''rtfts't'{tt'shi' hand-crafted quality and attention to
detail. These doors should be
oversized when possible, but in proportion to the frontage of which tlrcy
are a part. Entry doors for large retail centers or hotels should be
significantly larger than those found in smaller, more intimate shops.
Olher doors for structureq regardless of location, should be designed as
part of an obvious hierarchy, with primary entry doors the largest
secondary entry doors somewhat smaller, and private or egress'only
doors smaller yet.
Shapes ofdoors should relate directly to their locations on the building,
with rectangular shapes being the most prevalent. Specially-shaped doors
and double doors are encouraged at primary entries along retail frontages,
or as custom portals for private residences, while the middles of buildings
should be characterized by more standard shapes. Special shapes should
not be overused or used in a random, ad-hoc fashion; shapes such as
arched heads or square, overhead doors should relate to the overall
bui tding architecture.
LtotrsHelp ReoevelopMENT Mnsrrn PleN Page 8-31
a
UPDATED SEPT 05 Cnepren 8 Ancrurecruel Dpsrcl GuDerrNes
i
t,
i
I
I
I
L
t'rr,!--'/ llc//^e rdltrd dNu.'t'{rul li'ons hi!,' t0 (rtr ri, rt.' i/i. rr,f i(,ti lilrr
d,ttl ttt't r,s itt|I|tttg |orrd|s ld'!r.'tit:st,.tdtt.r.
Exterior Door Moterials and Colors
All exterior doors within Lionshead shall be constructed of high-quality,
durable materials such as woo4 metal-clad wood, or metal; doors at
primary hotel, condominium, or retail entries may also include large areas
of glass to attract pedestrians. Glass doors should relate to building
orientation, views, or functions, with large areas of glass generally
avoided in locations other than those notod. Mdintenance-free materials
such as copper, baked aluminum, and naturally-weathering woods are
encouraged-painted metals and woods should be avoided whenever
possible. Copper cladding and wrought iron doors may be left to patina
naturally, while industrial metals such as steel and aluminum should be
baked or anodized with frnish colors to match building trim.
Commercial Aonts and private entries offer the unique ability to introduce
hand-crafted, custorn-built portals for businesses and private residences,
and must also have the ability to display shop wares. They are therefore
permitted more latitude with respect to malerials, colors and amounts of
glazing. Aluminum storefronts may be used on commercial structur€s,
provided they ary finished in factory finish. All-glass doors are permitted
as well, with no limits set on the amount of glass permitted at retail level.
Etched glass is encouraged to bring a level ofdetail to special storefronts.
Doors which are part of window wall assemblies may also have large
glass areas, to take full advantage of mountain views. All exterior door
glazing shall be non-reflective, to minimize off-site glare, particularly
from the ski mountain.
J'
I
L,
{
Page 8-32 LroNsseao RnopvnlopMENT Mesren PreN
Crnprpn 8 AncrurrcrueL Desrcx GurpBLrNes UPDATED FEB 06
Exlerior Door Hardware
Variations in designs and materials for exterior door hardware at primary
entries are encouraged to bring a level offine detail and creative
expression to buildings within the community. Approved materials
include brass, copper, wrought ir.on, wood, and industrial metals such as
aluminum or steel. Industrial metals should be prefinished in colored or
clear factory finish systems to reduce maintenance problems. Door
hardware in areas other than primary entries should complement the
surrounding materials and details.
lllindow Sizes, Shapes and Types
As with exterior doors, window sizes should be appropriate to their
surrounding wall materials, with narrow, relatively tall windows used in
stone or concrete, bnd larger, more expansive windows used in field
materials such as stucco and wood siding, or in window wall assemblies.
Fenestration within field materials should be desimed with decorative
ffim and sills, or heavy structural
frames, so they do not appear as
"punch-outs" within those materials.
Windows located along retail streets
and other public ways offer locations in
which to display goods to pedestrians,
and should therefore be designed with
particular care. Window walls should
be designed in proportion to their
associated frontages, with windows at
large retail c€nters or hotels
significantly larger than those found in
.smaller, more intimate shops. Other
fenestration, regardless of location,
should be designed as part ofan
obvious hierarchy, with lower-level"
retail street openings the largest, and
windows above somewhat smaller.
!rq .'r --'-' ( l*n'rrr't'kn in. ntr, ltt
i,.r.h<tst. rtttttk. rtttti ttrt. Shapes of windows should also relate
directly to their locations on the
building, with rectangular shapes being the most prevalent.
Fenestration located within the middles of buildings should be shaped and
organized into fairly regular patterns, to establish rhythm and continuity.
Specially-shaped windows are encouraged at walls atong retail frontages,
n
Lronsupen REDEvELopMENT Mnsren Pr,eN Page 8-33
UPDATED SEFTOs CHeprsR 8 ARcsrrncruer DpsroN GumBlnqps
'i
.t'
I
;I,
or as custom openings in distinct areas ofprivate residences. They are
also appropriate at dormers and other special roof elements. As with
doors, specially-shaped windows should relate to the overall building
architecture. And as a general rule, the variety of geom€tric shapes used
should be limited to 3 on any given building.
Acceptable window types include high-quality fixed, double-hung,
awning, and casement units. Sliding windows and multiple-opening unir
such asjalousie are generally lesser-quality units not conducive to the
mountain environment and should be avoided. At retail levels, bay, box
and bow windows are encouraged to animate the pedestrian street and
integrate public and semi-public domains. All windows should strive to
add visual interest through careful design ofmullions, muntins, and
divided lites. The intent of the Guidelines is to recall the regional
heritage through the thoughtful design of fenestration and how it relates
in scale, proportion, and materials, to the tripartite order of structures
within the community.
{'
I
t
I:
f
t,
/'r.(,\--'-l ,t i,f.J{lr: sfuu d ht thtaghtft lr
;lcsiqnel 'nl rL'ltttt to rlt.'r'.til n.rr.,t'i.tls
rrltrch surntuttd llrl rt
l{indow Materiuls and Colors
Windows within Lionshead shall be
painted or stained wood, or clad in
maintenance-free metals such as
copp€r, or aluminum and steel with
baked finishes. Copper cladding
may be left to patina naturally, while
baked enamel colors for aluminum
and steel cladding should be similar
to trim colors, and in similar
complementary hues to wall colors
or stained wood colors. Factory
finishes should be selected to
withstand the intense ultraviolet
radiation found at higher elevations,
and prolonged fade-resistant
warranties should be considered. [n
addition, glazing shall be non-
reflective, to minimize off-site glare,
particularly from the ski mountain.
Decorative shutters are permitted within Lionshead only if they are
designed to operate or appear to operate. When use4 they should be
constructed of wood and finished with durable stains or paints. Their
design and placement should be consistent and should not take on a
Design freedom is within
Page 8-34
random or
LIoNSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT MISTNR PLAN
Crnprpn 8 Ancumecrulr DrsrcN Gurnelnms UPDATED FEB 05
these parameters, and within the context of the other architectural
elements found on the building, including handrail designs, omamental
iron, and similar detailing.
8.42.6 Balconies, Guardrails, and Ilandrails
Location and Siu
Balconies should be carefi.rlly located with respect to their orientation to
the sun, involvement with public spaces, and snow and watershed from
structures above and onto structures or passers-by below. They should be
sized as outdoor rooms, with ample space for outdoor fumiture and other
amenities, or merely as small, private parapets used as "step-outs" to
allow fresh air into the adjacent room. False balconies and balconies
which straddle these two roles should be avoided, as they tend to lack the
/'-r.gr,\.-rJ (( .l- -'-i ( irstotf,
guardnuIs,!n.l b.tl.' tn' dtJlLttit
(rr? erc{rtri1rgr,.I1 u [h!n .'sIK,l
benefits ofeither and are often left unused. Proper location and size will
ensure that balconies become animated spaces, rather than outdoor
storage areas. As animated spaces, their placement in public plazas and
pedestrian streets--straddling the semi-private and public domains-will
infuse those spaces with the vitality needed to draw visitors to Lionshead.
Balconies which face service alleys or are located within other socially
"dead" spaces, or are susceptible to water or snowshed are generally
unsuccessful spaces and should be avoided in Lionshead. The intent of
this Section is to infuse public spaces with the energy of oscupied
. balconies, and encourage designers to avoid the design of lifeless
balconies which remain unoccupied and therefore detract from public
spaces.
LroNssBeo REDEvELopMENT MestBR PLeu Page 8-35
UPDATED SEPTOs
E.4.2.7
CnevreR I ARcHrrEcruaL DssIcN Gutpsln{es
Materials and Designs
Custom designs for balconies, gqardrails, and handrails offer the
opportunity for truly creative expression within these Guidelines, and
unique design solutions are encouraged. Approved materials for primary
elernents such as guardrails, handrails, posts, and support brackets
include stucco-covered walls (for guardrails only), naturally wealher-
resistant woods, wrought iron and other decorative metals, and steel.
Materials such as glass, plastic, pipe rails, and metal panels are strongly
discouraged. Secondary elements such as pickets and srnamental
detailing may use other materials not listed above but will be reviewed on
a case-by-case basis. Materials which m€et th€ intent of the Guidelines
and work in harmony with the architectural language of the building can
lead to positive solutions, but all secondary building materials will be
approved at the discretion of the reviewing body.
Drainable balconies.<r those which shedwater ofthem via waterproof
membranes as opposed to letting water trickle through thern-shall be
designed whenever other balconies, pedestrian streets, or other public
ways Eu€ exposed to water or snowshed from those balconies. Placement
of the drain systems should be carefully considered to avoid passers-by
below. Non-drainable balconies may be used in all other locations and
should be constructed of weather-resistant woods or omamental metals.
Within these general parameters, balcony, guardrail, and handrail designs
should be patterned after a rational order of structure and detail. Primary
structural or decorative members should be in proportion to the balconies
they are supporting which in tum should relate to the overall buitding
scale. An honest, straight-forward expression ofstructure should be
sought whenever possiblg avoiding designfaux pas such as stucco-
covered beams or grossly undersized brackets.
Generul
In keeping with the spirit of the
area's mountain architecture,
primary roofs within Lionshead
are to be predominantly gables
and hip+ with sheds or flat roofs
permitted at smaller, secondary
roofs. Primary roofs are defined
as roofs which cover more than
500 SF of roo/area, while
/'ti: .\-16 /'.,flc rttt:r,llrrrs -rlrrlrl.J l.r. rrr//r
.rr r.lr'. t,ryl < tdilti ttt rei tl r tlrc rtst t,i
I hc hurIthnt' t tu't'h ur.:t t urul lat rynugt.
.['
I
I
t'
I
t
I
t'
I
;
i
t,
I
t
f.:
I
L:
FiI
['
VELOPMENT MESTEN PINU
Crnpren 8 Ancsrrpcruel DssrcN Guoer,Nes UPDATED FEB 06
secondary roofs are those which cover 500 SF ofroo/area or less.
Secondary roofs which occur at logical breaks in building massing may
exceed 500 SF ifthe general intent of fragmented forms and visual
harmony is met. Free-standing sheds and butterfly roofs are not
permitted. Mansard roofs are permitted on buildings where pitched roofs
would be impractical, if the mansards are of similar form, pitch, material,
color, and detail to other roofs within the community (and identified
within these Guidelines). If used, these types of roofs should be
considerate not only ofviews from the pedestrian street, but also those
from the ski mountain. To this end, areas of flat roof within the slopes of .
the mansard shall be limited to the practical minimum, and the materials
for the flat roof shall be black or in a color to blend with the sloped roof.
In addition, rooftop equipment within the flat areas shatl be painted to
blend with the roof material (see "Miscellaneous Equipment" Section to
follow). The overall image for Lionshead takes its cue from the simple,
fragmented, gabled roof forms of European alpine villages, wherb views
ofthe roofscapes from the mountains are paramount.
All new construction shall comply with the following roof criteria.
Substantial expansions and renovations shall also adhere to these
Guidelines, along with the remaining portions of the building which are
not being expanded or rgnovated (see exceptions above, in Sections 8.3.1,
8.3.4.2, and later in this Section). Roof framing shall be expressed
wherever possible, particularly through exposed ridge beams, outriggers,
rafter tails, and fascia boards.
D ime ns io nal G uidel ines
Roofs should be constructed with 30" minimum eave and rake overhangs,
with dimensions dependent upon overall building size. Secondary roofs
may have overhangs as small as 18", but should work with the overall
scale of the roofscape. Ridge beams and outriggers should be of visually
sturdy members (6x or 8x material for wood, and equivalent sizes for
other materials), sized to support rafters and overhangs; decorative end -
cuts or pattems are encouraged. Rafter tails shall also appear sturdy (2x
or 3x material for wood) and be exposed to express structure. Eave and
rake fascias shall be wide enough to screen end profiles at metal roofs,
and to offer a consistent image with r€spect to structural roof members.
Pitch
Roof pitches for primary
roofs shall be from 6: 12 to
12:12, inclusive. Pitch
breaks are permitted when
I';g,\ '- .'1,,,,rr.; r ,:., lencl lL'rlrra t.t tltr
r)r ff(]il rrfr)^(r{x, Ltl l.i,usircud.
LroNsuren Rrpn Page 8-37
UPDATED SEPT 05 CuerreR 8 AncHrrecruet- DesrcN GuDeLNes
they occur at architecturally appropriate locations such as plate lines,
changes in plane, etc. To add variety to the Lionshead roofscape,
secondary sloped roofs may have pitches ranging from 4:12 to l2:12, and
flat roofs may have limited use as secondary forms. Existing structures
with especially large footprints may deviate from the pitch requirements
ifthey meet the overall intent ofthe roofguidelines and are responsive to
views from both the pedestrian street and the ski mountain. Steep
mansard roofs which exceed the 12:12 maximum pitch criteria are not
encouraged, but may be necessary in certain instances when excessive
building dimensions make the 12:12 pitch requirement impractical.
These buildings will be handled on a case-by-case basis, and
evaluated on intent rather than quantitative criteria.
f,
Page 8-38 LIousHeen REDEVELopMENT Masrsn PLIN
CHeprsn 8 AncnnBcrunl Destcr'r GuDeLrNrs UPDATED FEB06
Materials and Colors
Primary roofs shall be covered with a limited palette of unit materials to
present a coherent image for Lionshead. Approved materials for primary
roofs include-but are not limited to-metal shingles, cementitious
shingles, concrete tiles, wood shakes or shingles, and hieh-qualiW asphalt
shingles which offer acceptable colors and depth. Metal shingles may be
of copper (16 ozlSF minimum weight), teme metal, or other materials
with natural patina. Secondary roofs may be covered with metal panels,
in conugated, rolled, or standing seam profiles, Primary roofs shall be in
neutral, earth-tone colors, with brown or gray tones-bright colors or
reflective materials are not permitted. Roofs may incorporate blends to
achieve desired colors---on-site mock-ups are required when blends are
proposed. At retail levels, accent colors are permitted for secondary roofs
to add vitality to the streetscape. Changes in roof materials or colors
shall take place in logical locations, such as changes in pitch or changes
in plane.
Dormerc
Dormers are considered secondary roofelembnts, and as such are
permitted some latitude in terms of form, pitch and material. Dormers
may be gables, hips, or sheds, with pitch as identified previously for
secondary roofs. When designed as an extension ofupper-level walls,
they should be constructed in the more traditional manner, above broken
€avos on both sides ofthe dormers, as opposed to continuous eaves up
and over the dormers. Design freedom is encouraged, and dormers with
non-compliant forms or pitches will be considered if the overall roofscape
provides the image intended.
/ i11 ,\--lri -lrrarr.grarl dt'lrttl-; shnniti t'.'i t( t(l
t,rhtt t ircl!!1..r'!ut'ttl (i.'ul4JtrIt tu rh,'iuldiuy
Snowg uards, Gutters and
Downspouts
Snowguards or snowclips
shall be used wherever
significant amounts of
snow may accumulate over
occupied areas, such as
pedestrian streets, entries,
patios, decks, balconies, or
uncovered parking areas.
Pitched roofs which face
north are particularly
susceptible to snow and ice
accumulation, as are lower
roofs to the north of+nd
therefore in the shadow of--their higher neighbors. In these cases
I,ronssBen RBppvrlopMENT MesrBR Pr-eN Page 8-39
UPDATED SEP'T 05
o
CgeprnR 8 Ancgtrncrunl Destctg Gutopltttns
several rows of snowguards or many snowclips may be necessary. Snow
and ice accumulation on metal roofs-which heat quickly during sunny
winter days-is especially dangerous to unsuspecting persons or
equipment. Metal roofs which face south or are located significantly
higher than adjacent, lower roofs shall be equipped with snowguards or
snowclips to prevent inj ury to people or damage to lower roofs.
Outdoor gathering areas which face south and are not completely covered
may be exposed to water drip from the roofs above them. These
locations-which may include heavily-used public spaces such as sun
pockets or pocket plazas-are ideal candidates for gutters and
downspouts. Where roofs are in constant shadow or have northern
exposuros, gutters and downspouts used in conjunction with heat tape
may work well. Gutters used below snowguards should be designed to
take the load of the accumulated snow and ice which snowguards
frequently release.
Approved materials for gutters and downspouts within Lionshead include
aluminum or steel with baked finish, and copper or lead-coated copper.
Gutter sections may be traditional or half-round. Snowguards shall be
constructed ofpainted platd steel vertical supports (painted black, or to
match roof or building trim color) with horizontal members made of
materials which recall the structure of the building, such as timbers, logs,
or fube steel . Large structures, where snowguards are not readily visible
from street level, may use the more utilitarian expanded metal or mesh
dams, welded to steel horizontal sections and vertical supports. All
exposed steel shall be painted.
M kcellaneo us Eq uipment
All miscellaneous rooftop equipment, including roof vents, antennas and
satellite dishes, shall be painted to blend with the roofs to which they
relate. Major pieces of equipment on commercial buildings shall be
strategically located to conceal them from view, or hidden in cupolas or
other structures----exposed equipment is not permitted. All flashings
shall be copper or painted metal to match those found on exterior walls.
The intent ofthese provisions is to pres€nt a well-blended roofscape
throughout the community, ab seen from the public spaces as well as from
the mountain.
['
t
Page 8-40 LroNsHeeo REDEVELopMENT Mesrsn PLaN
o
CHeprs,R 8 ARcHrrncrual Dpsrcx Gunnnqes UPDATED FEB 06
8.4.2.8
S ky lights/S o lar Panels
Skylights and solar panels are permitted within Lionshead if they are less
than 3 feet higher than the sunounding roof. Both elements must be
included in maximum roof height calculations, and shall be well-hidden
from street level and the mountain.
Fireplaces and Chimneys
F irep lac e Req uire me nts
Fireplaces shall be designed to meet all applicable Codes, including the
restriction on wood-buming units within Lionshead. Exposed flues and
venls for gas-operated fireplaces or other equipment such as fumaces
should be hidden from primary views, and painted to blend with the
nearest building materials-
I ig fi-Jl) I)L,.,oruttry L'hr ttl(.r' (:ults
t.titt L,ltl tr L'f.'st ttt llv rorllslupc
Chinney Sizes and Shapes
All flues 6" diameter or greater which
penetrate roofs shall be designed with
chimneys. The sizes of chimneys
should be in scale with the architecture
of the building-not small enough to
be lost in the massiveness of the
structure, but not large enough to
overwhelm the structure. Chimneys
should.be designed with relatively
slender proportions when viewed from
at least one profile, with height greater
than width, and in rectangular shapes.
Heights of gas-burning chimneys or
boiler flues shall be designed to proportionally match their wood-buming
counterparts, to lend authenticity and consistency to the overall
roofscape.
Chimney Materids
Chimneys within Lionshead shall be covered in stone veneer (to match
building veneer) oi stucco, to express the alpine heritage ofthe area.
Wood or metal-clad chimneys are permitted at small, residentially-scaled
buildings only.
LroNsueao ReoevnLopMENT MnsrEn Preu Page 8-41
UPDATED SEFT 05 CHnpreR 8 AncHrrecrueL DrsrcN Gutoer.tNps
r'ri
-l
'f '
I
I
t-'
I
t
Chimney Caps
Chimneys may terminate in decorative caps of stone, stucco, or metal.
Creative designs, such as arched openings within caps, barrel or pitched
metal roofs, and the like are encouraged to lend interest to the building
roofscape. Chimney caps should act as elegant crowns to nicely-
proportioned chimneys, and should not seem bulky or top-heavy. When
flat or pitched stone caps are used, they shall have a minimum thickness
of4". All chimney caps shall be designed to screen spark arrestors and
other utilitarian equipment as much as possible.
Detail
Detail should be introduced to the architecture of Lionshead to infuse
heritage, culture, and artistry to the Lionshead environment. Well-
designed ornamentation can serve to complement and perhaps intensiff
the other architectural principles discussed in these Guidelines, but
should be designed to work in harmony with-and not again'st-the basic
architecture. The design of signage, brackets, lightposts, and the like
should present a hand-crafted quality, particularly at street level. Detail
at the middles of buildings should rely more upon pattem or carefully-
designed repetition to visually connect parts ofa building together or
separate buildings to one another.
lits '\--i/) 1,fu11 5-.i-' irL,r,ril tirnltl rL'ilti t |t r:r/rlgc' rztrl
''.r3r
ty trt i i,ttt:tyl
t
8.4.2.9
Fl
t
f
i
Page 8-42 LroNsgrao ReonvpLopMENT Mnsrnn PleN
;'
CnnprBR 8 Ancmrpcruer, DpsrcN GuroelnqBs UPDATED FEB 06
8.5 Summary Tabte of Quantitative Criteria
8.4. 1.3 Pedestrian Street Width-to-Height Relationships
8.4.2.3 Bldg Eave Height at RetaiyPedesrrian Srreets
8.4.2.3 Bldg Eave Height at Ski Yard/Gore Cr Conidor
8.4.2.3 Bldg Eave Height at Remaining Areas
E.4.2.3 Wall Surface Criteria
8.4.2.3 Maximum Ridge Heights
8.4.2.4 Exterior Horizontal Wall Spans
8.4.2.4 PtimwylSecondary Bldg Material Delinitions
8.4.2.4 Primary/Secondary Bldg Colors
8.4.2.7 Pimary/Secondary Roof Defi nitions
Compliance Criteria for Existing Roofs
8.4.2.7 RoofDimensionat Guidelines
8.4.2.7 Roof Pitch
The following table offers a "quick glimpse" ofthe quantitative crit€ria established within these Guidelines, by
SOction number. However, it is not designed to act in lieu of a thorough review of this document. The values
listed in the table should be evaluated in conjunction with the actual Sections which they pertain ro,
particularly in light ofthe explanations ofdesign intent, clarifications, possible exceptions, and other notes not
identified within.
Sect Descrlotion Criteria
l:l/2 to l: I %
50% wall face @ 16' rnaximum height
50% wall face @36' maximum height
12' minimum step baok
48' maximum eave height
12' minimum step back
60' maximum eave height
12' minirnum step back
35' maximum vertical face
Horizontal step required
7l' average maximum height
82.5' absolute maximum height
30' maximum span at street level
Primary: exceed 500 SF area
Secondary: 500 SF area or less
Primary: exceed 5@ SF area
Secondary: 500 SF area or less
Primary: oxceed 500 SF roof area
Secondary: 500 SF roof area or less
Substantial expansion/renovation
30" min eave and rake overhangs
18" overhangs at secondary roofs
Primary: 6:12 to 12:12
Secondary: 4: l2 to 12:12 (or flat)
LroNsHpep ReopvnLopMENT Mnsrs,n Pleu Page 8-43
<=n H'i"'JllL,,,,*
February n,2W6
a
illnJff****,
Od'ttr, Cobr&
Town of Vail Public Works/Transportation ru
1309 Elkhom Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Atbr: Thomas E. Kassmel
Re: LionSquareLodgeNorth
Lionshead Village, Vail, Colorado .
'
Dear Mr. Kassmel:
Tl-l^:T:l3r beenprepared ro document the resulb of a traffic impactanarys* 0t tutlre traffic conditions associated with the proposed expansion
{_l: Y"" Selarg.Iodqe_ North. The Lion Square Lodge'North ir'fo""t Jarong the east side of Lionshead prace h Lionshead Vilage in Vail,
f""1":9::3" expansion of the existing site ie anticipated ro inilude up torr new condominium/ townhome units and 650 square feet of additional
::tuil ry". Thg v-icinity map illustrating the project locarion is shown inFigure 1, attached,
The purpose of this lefter is to identify hip generation characteristics todetermine potmtial traffic relatea impacts on tte ro""t "tr*iyrl-, JI to
$ev$op-rritigation measures at muy te ,,"."rsary as a result of Lion SquareLodge Norttr Condominiunr.sproject impacts, n* st rdy ius t;" pref,;;in accordance with rown of vaii standLds and indudes tever of tvice
lt--O,?]^11ry::for study.area intersecrions. This study specifi."Uyirr"f"al,
evaruation of the folrowing key intersections that wiri provide tra?fic accessto the project from the South Frontage Road:
. South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (east portal)
r South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle fvest portal)
l:._,!:]::-l is,currently proposed to include development of up to 13conoonuruum/ townlnme units and 650 square feet of ierail use on the siteof the existing Lion Square Lodge. A conceptual site plan.is attached.
For. analysis pulposes, it is assumed that the Lion Square Lodge Northproject will be complete aroun d year 2007, and was therefore arnly-zed witlr
I
rEr 36 26 Am
FM 3S 446 8678
o
Mr. Thomus E, Ikssnrel, February 21, 2006, page Z
I Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Gcneratiott: Att I nftrnntiort Report,
Seventh Edition, Washington DC, 2003.
V-fl Kimlev-Horn\"IZ-J anoAssocrares.rnc.
this- horizon' The analysis of a long-term 2025 horizon is arso included
f$gnis study, as required by theCilorado Deparhnentof Traruportation(cDor).
Regislal access to the Lion Square Lodge North is provided by l-70.
Primary access will be gained from the sou-th Frontage Road. Drect"access
1o th.e3roiect will be provided by rwo driveways aiong Lionshe"d il;;.
South F-rontage Road is a cDor roadway (classification F-R) with one travellane in each direction. It runs along the south side of Interstate 70.P-lTdy: the frontage. road is located-north of Lionshead Vilfage. The
:g."dyly has aspeed limit of 25 miles per hour through the projEct area.west Lionshead Circle serves as a collecior roadway with one lane of traver
in each direction. Both east and west portal intersecions of west uonsheadGrcle with the South Frontage Road ire stop controlled on the minor streetapproach with free flow movements arong tire Frontage Road. Existing taneconfigurations and haffic control at the ke]r intersections studied are shownin Figwe 2, attached.
To a_ccurately determine the impact of the Lion Square Lodge North project,
|{lk r?lyT: expected at the time of project buildout were necessary. The
2007 and ZaE background pre development traffic vorumes were obiainedhom the Rifz-carlton Residencesat v;ir Traffic Impact study completed inoctober 2005 by Kirnley Hom and Associates, lrc. ihe total taffic vorumesfrom the Ritz-carlton Residences at Vail study were obtained from the VailResorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Mastei pran Traffic lmpact stuJy,Kimley-Hom and Associates, September 15, 2003. These volumes *"r" *"das.the background traffic volumes for this sfudy. Background trafficvolumes for 2007 are shown in Figure B. Background traffic volumes for
ZQ?S are shown in Figure 4
Site-generated traffic estimates are determined through a process known asbip generation. Rates are appried to proposed land uses to estimate traffic
generated
_ by_ developments during - a specific time interval. The
acknowledged source for trip gmerati6n rates is the current edition of the
Trrp .c*turation Reporfi published by Institute of rransportation Engineers(lrE). ITE has established trip rates in nationwide studies of similir land
:"":.. th"- I]E TCp Generation Report average bip rates that apply toResidential condominium/Townholse (230) w-ere uied to estrmate Laffic
generated by the condominiunsa Trip geneiation for the retail ,pu." *",
determined using ITE Land Use Code: Sfecialty Retail (g14) for the'pM peakhour. ITE does not provide trip generatibn rates for this land use for the AM
o
<=n x#'flJl',l,*,,Mr. Thonas E, Kassnel, February 21,2006, pege 3
Table 1 - The Lion fruare Lodge North proiect Tralfic Generation
2 Transportation Research Board,, Higlrway Capacity Mnnuol, SpeaalReport 209,
Washington DC,2000.
peak hour. Therefore, T?Ting bip generahion rates provided in theLionshead RedevelopmenilururtJrpru'" f3, Sf*i"ity n"t"il were used.
Table I summarlzes the estimated. traffic generation for the Lion square\dgg worth' The hip generation worisheets are attached. Thesecalculations
'lushate
the rates used and directional disbibution of trips.
Distributionof site baffic on the sbeet systemwas based on the distribution
*:tryO pd lnfrovga.previously riitf,i" tf,. U""rf,"ad Village Traffictmpactshrdies' Finrre 5 iliustrates tire expecteJpro;ecttrip dishibution forthe LionSquare Lo-ctee North T;"fil;;ffi;-"-i;,; obrained by apptyingthe distributions tJ the esrimated
""?ri. 1"""i"o"". project trafficassignmentfor the Lion Sq,,are_Lodge North fii"i*i i, shown in Figure 5.1?:1i:": Lodge Nortrr tr"ri" uoi"io *"Iulil.a ," th; b""-#;;;
::j:T.r to. repre-sent--esrimated baffic conditions for fuX "p-i".t
oevelopment. Torar traffic volumes are ilr'shated in Fi*i z1* ,hTiti,ihorizon and Figure g for the 20ZS horieon.
Kirnley-Hom's anarvses
".f ogji. operations in the site vicini$r wereconducted to determine potentiar capacity deficiencies in the 2007 and2'Edevelopment horizons. ihetackground.,(pr";;;;-l r;"renr) traffic volumes
l1l:_9:f *d::d previously * h. t"r"i'O;&f"ilo pr"" project) harficvolumes in the Ritz{arrtonResidences atVar t lni. irnpu.tstudy. Resultsfrorn this.analysis are showrr for infor*uuorrai;;;**. f?rese horizonswere studied with the addirion of Lio" E";il;;;North project haffic.The.acknowledged source for a.t"r"*rlig ;r.*ffLp".iry is the currentedition of the Hr'glnua11 &pncity lvlanuap.
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ln Out Total In Out Total
Condominium
(12 units)1 J 4 2 6
Retail
(650 square fee9
Total
0 0 0 1 1 2
1 4 J 3 8
K=n x;l'i"JliL*,,,Mn Thomas E. Kassmet, Fehnnry 21, 2006, page 4
capacity anarysis results are listed in terms of lever of service (Los). Los isa qualitative term describing operuting condiUlr,-, u ariu", _ill experience:l*::::\g:" " fl'l"trli,u*t il;;;;;;t curar rime intervar. rtranges rrom A (verv [nl" g:By) to F (loniaeiays and congesu"il -ff,"
Town of Vail recommends LOS'i
"i u.ti"i
""r
ii"luur,rr. or desirabre levelof service and LOS D as acceptable levuf ol re*lc" during the peak hours.
The. intelle$on operations at key intersections were analyzed using theunsignalized analvsis methodologies found i i *" urgt"rr, ffir, *f";;
{{cYJ ":Tc ry Highway capaci'ty s.il; ii.ds 2000) program, Retease
1 1 Th: Ioxgwing piovidis a aiscusrio. oi u,Jl"ilr or r"*ice results on anintersectio*by-intersection basis (calcurations
"tt".rr"al. Lever of service isshown for both of t'e s|fy -t t*.t.-*-""t"g ,Le existing intersectiongeomety as well as with irnproved geome*y. It; inportant to note that thecritical gaps were modified to dfionstaie tl" neua"a gap acceptancedif,erences created by the installation of lefr t*" accereration lanes at thesubject intersections. fhl.criUlal gap for l"ffi; eriting from the sidesheets was matched with those rotini t*to-s utioirrgr-* thefrontasel.* frg: gaps would be similar.ir,"" tf,"* i"rf,.r?*ri.r" "*ri"ffijhaffic. This was done to Erost accuratefy moaef intersections withacceleration lanes.
South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (west portal)The West Uonshead Circle (west portal) approactr to this uruignalizedintersection of the south Frontage ni"iir-"p.cted to operate atunacceptable level of sew_ice in thI short,"r* ifbz fotor. pio, io tfr"-
iddtdo"- ol t-i-gns Square Lodge N"rE prq".iiJir.. rfr* is due to theexpected traffic volume_inleases ;"i.ip";; by the LionsheadRedeveloprnent projects. The results t"a""t* tlt the northbound lefttuming vehidesmav find itdifficuttto e.te, tt esouih rronrage Road due to
$1 rusn $uoystr voiumes "ront.l,;1";il;;;;; in improvementto theintersection that is needed base-d on the uJnsheal Reae.relopment proiectsand prior to the additiol o{ rrions E;;;; il;. N""t 'pr"l".ii,"iii"
includes the construcrion of a,t"n ty f""-_"r*.1*!if;i Solr*, frontage Road.Construction of this left t!
improve op.'utio* J?- ;Id;:iif."lf#fj:f;"#"j,.,,n:.*e."**
vehicles to enter the Frontage Roud more eailiy iflru_g u a"signated Ianeor retuge area to tum into ftfore **ging;itil tl,";gh westbound traffic.In additioru per the State_Access CoaeiUott "uJiou'a right turn andwestbound left turn ranes from the south rto"tut" no"a are warranted atthis intersecfion. With these i*pro""*.",i"1[. *olr.rrr"r,t, at thisinterspction are expected to operate acceptabry in the near term and loneterm horizons, with or without the addidon oi pr.l".t t ufn;l;ilil:right-of-way is availabre, the Town .r v"ii ti"i irrr, .r-.""r"a.11ir"designation of separate left and ,igtt t"r"-i"";,J rro* thu minor srreet
Mr. Thotws E. Kass aI. Fslrrusry 21, 2006, prye S
Table 2 - South Frontage Road/west Liorshead circre (west portar) Log Resurts
aPproach to this intersection. This irnprovement is not needed based uponI:^"]:t.:"*t: Tdldr, $.t wgurf irnprove tf," o"irarf operations ofrherntersection' Tabre 2 provides the leveltf s"tui.a rorrrc ut this intersection
South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (east portal)A westbound left tum lane was found to be required at this intersection in2007 prior to project devetop_ment il;;;;;;t Highway Access Coderequirements for cateeory -F-R
roaa-uysl -
wiil--,r,i, i-prorremmt, thisunsignalized east porti inters-rtion of tf,e soo*, r-rrt"g" noad with westLioruhead Circle is anricipated-to.""Hr;; r;;;;te with an acceptablelevel of service in 2007with and *rrfr"* ,f,-.lajiU* of project haffic
Pdor to the addition of project traffic in 2025, separate northbound left andls^lj*: T:.atong west Lionsh;.d-d;';';icipatea to be needed rmantarn acceptable level of service. In addition, a right turn d..;i;;;;lane is anricipated to be warranred by 2025 b"";; ;;; redevelopmmt of theNorth Day Iot asidmtified in tt
"
ut*t ."-a-riJa"iliopment rraffic ImpactStudy. Tabte 3 provides tr," rur"r oi s"r;; ;J;; this intersection
Scenario
Without Proiect With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay
(eeqtueh)LOS Delay
(aeqfueh)LOS Delay
(seqlveh)LOs Delay
(oeqfteh)LOS2oo7sho.rrefr---
Without Improvementg
Westbatnd Approadt
Northhund Awoaclt
9.2
79.6
A
c
9.1
47"
A
F
A
B
F
B
D
9.2
19.5
9.2
15.1
10.3
46.5
10.3
76.5
A
c
9.7
6E.6
A
lirOOf Shorirefr--
With Improvements
Wsthomdkft
Northbound AWoadt
9.2
15,0
A
c 9.1
,1n A
c
9.1
8.1
A
DI zu5 Long Term
I Without Lnprovements
Westbound ApnoadtWu
With Imprcvements
Westbound Left
Northbound. Aryotch
10.3
46,5
10.3
16.5
B
B
c
10.7
522e
10.7
8.7
B
E
70.7
5At B
f
B
c
1.0.7
25.8
B
D
o
<=n f'T'i'**',i,,',,.,Mr. Thomns E. kxrnet, Fcbruary 21, 2006, page 6
Table 3 - South FronFage Road/ West Lionshead Circle (east portal) LOS Resulb
Based on the analysis oresented in this report, Kiurley_Hom believes theLt31 fu""t" t glgi I'I9'rth project haffic *itt lu ,o."rrfully incorporatedwithout any additional improvements needed beyond wha,il, ;;;;;;i;been identified with the Lioruh."d R"d;;;il;;ilfrq"o. If you have anyquestions relating to this analysis, please cali meatiaOSl n*i3}4-.'-'-'',
Sincerely,
KTYLE,-H9RN AND AssocrArEs, rNc./ffi 27*(
Curtis D. Rowe p,E., PTOE
Associate
Scenario
Without Project With Projcct
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay
(seq/teh)LOS Delay
(sedveh)LOS Delay
(segtueh)LOS Delay
(Eec/veh)LOS
Zxl7ShortTern
Existing Roadway
Weslbound Approech
Northbound Approactt
E.9
20.7
A
c
8.9
A
A
D
E.9
n.3 c
8.9
35.7
A
E2007 ShorT;fi-
With Improvemento
Westbounil ltft
Northbounil Approaclr
8.9
t7.l c 8.9
m,4
11.1
592.7
A
!.
B
.F
8.9
77.4_
103
143.4
A
c
8.9
20,8
A
cems rong T-rm-
Exicting Roadway
Westbotmd Approadr
Northbounil Awrmch
ZdE tonsTtrm--
wlth Improvetnents
Westbounil Left
Northbound Lcft
Northbwnrl Right
10.3
7n.4
B
F B
F
11.1
6?f.1
B
.F
103
u.8
n.6
B
D
c
11.1
26.3
22.0
B
D
c
10.3
28.4
n.8
B
D
11.1
26.8
22.9
B
D
c
oo
l|Ts oedoar.o@
;@*w
;cfii-+ xtrS"i!2y'
r::ffitrinr,*-1
LION SQUARE LODGE NORTH
SITE LOCAT]ON FIGURE 1
<=n ]f;ffffi*,*
oo
ffi:,#i/@ ,.'.. '.-.-.'
'r, trat8-.
,'tt*"t^ ,., \' , i ;J'+-.).i ./': \.."'.-l't,'! | *l*..r rcjgL
i;"{:--i---'
*;;'li.;' "l r-- r'!--1
il'.-,., ',:--
a
q.9
tEllgl
LEGEND
Study Arle Key Intonection
Slop Controlled Apprwctr
Roadway Speed Limit
LION SQUARE LODGE NORTH
EXISTING LANEAGE AND CONTROL FIGURE 2
<=n :fit#[,*,,
oo
#G''<6r* t*
// ,.r\/ ...,-"'u \ ."49r/ .;'"*i"l\"''^i o\:t
/ 1..'1 l, 1.Jr_fJ'CjE5_
r€sr trffi".:-.'
\"
LEGEND
a Study Arsa Key tnbrsecion
XX(XX) AM(PM) Pes& Hour Traffic Vorum€s
LION SQUARE LODGE NORTH
2OO7 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 3
K=n l#'itl?lt*,,*
oo
,#6@'*,**
55%
***o^t to
!' ,',t'..|qd-1!'5
i. ggls*"Ji--t"'l,r-.1
.l-,''"-.
Ii'r I\ -*' i r.*..) J ,l r-*--*-*rt .d ''I' l''
..r' -' -.sf- .J I
.'eS-" -*' | "o"t*
FIGURE 5
.\Y)ia -*- | -',rre7 i Lr
,ir ' ins urnaPrr
a- ""
I""T I
",.*^" t.. - -"t,
\
LION SQUARE LODGE NORTH
PROJECT TR IP DTSTRIBUTION
LEGEND
O Study Aroa Key lnteBedjon
XX%(XXo/6) Entsring (Extdng) frip Diskibutbn
ZlfTf Ktmtey.Hon
L-rI/ I ano Assoqarcs, rnc
ot
i -."--:". -"
I "'--- "-: "J,"-** *"*:T
LEGEND
O study Area K€y Intersection
XX(XX) AM(PM) P€sk Hour Trafic Vou.rE6
LION SQUARE LODGE NORTH
PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSTGNMENT FIGURE 6
664€;":,
'.,."'n^
',.
\.
.; ^"-. \ ljlP-.
,'' v$ser ,,, \, . . i Xf n|[ ,t,i )" 't \.' .t.r'r /.' -.i.-;r_.r".; blRCtEii'{ffi
<=n j#'l'"f#,,,,,n,
oI
t{Il @6arar.000
,;;Lo'-
.i *---"'--
CONE.sEA
-J
i
'
ire urnnPrt
I ffn
I r---------- .f L---*--)
LEGEND
O stJdy Aroa lGy Inters€ction
XX(XX) AM(Pil) FeEk Hour T.amc Votums!
LION SQUARE LODGE NORTH
2OO7 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 7
ftl KimlBpHom
17 \ and Associates, Inc,
oo
Ciln $['tffi,*,*
Lion
Deslgned by
Checked by
EAG.February
Sreef No. -T o--l--
ITE Trio Generation Manual 7th Editlon, Averge Rate
Land Use Code - Residential Condominiumrfownhouse (230)
Independant Variable - Dwelling Units (X)
l= 12
T = Average Vehide Trlp Ends
(I) = 0.44 (X)
(T) = 0.44 *
Directlonal Distribution :17% ent. 83Yo exit.
12.0
l= 5
1 entering
Average Vehicle Tdp Ends4 exiting
=5
O) = 0.s2 (X)
(T) = 0.52 *
Directional Distribution: 670/o ent. 38%T =. 6 Average Vehide Trip Ends4 entering 2 exiting
exit.
12.0
Lion G
Kimiey.l.lo.n
andAssodates, lnc,
Proj@t
Su0ecf
13.2m6 JobChecked by Sreetruo. -T--f--T--
ITE Trio Generatlon Manual 7th Edition, Average Rate Equations
Land Use Code - Specialty Retait Cenrer (814)
lndependant Vafiable - 1000 Sq. Feet cross Leasable Area (X)
f, = 0.65
T = Average Vehide TriD Ends
Average Weekclay
enlering ff,n) = 0.11 (R fi)=
(Trn) =
fl'r) =
0
0
0
exiting O"J = o.o7 (X)entering
aritingenterlng CfiJ=O.tt" (0.7)
exitirE fi6) = 0.07, (0.7)
Average Weekday
A=2.71(X)
(Tl=2.71 '
Directional Distributionr 43% ent. ST%J = 2 . Average Vehicle Trip Ends1 enterlng 1 exiting
exit.
(0.7')
(T) = 4.432 (X)
(F) = 4.432'(0.7)
Dlrectional Distribution: S0% entering, SO% o(iting| = 2 Average Vehicle Trip Ends
'peah hour of g*aatff ql Satutday assumcd to ba 1 Ot6 of ddty
1 entering
1+1
1 e,(iting
=2
TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNT
rcf Generator. Saturda
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
senerat Inlormation Site lnformation
-
Analyst EAeAgency/Co. Kjmtey-Hom
Date Performed 2/19/06
Anafysis Time period Totat AM
lntersection FrontagelW. Wes/. Lionshead
CirJurisdiclion Town of Vall
Anafysis Year 2OOz
_ . _t__. ____,,t w.t L.v,, st4uatv Lv{r(JG| Ilo ,molovemcnts
Eopvvyt,ur orree(: uouln F/Dntene Raert
lnlgfseclfon ()riFnlati^n. E-61 lAt^Rt lqlh/soun Street W,t,yestl,o7s;;m
v"hi"r"voror""ffi
Major Street Easbouncl I _ Westbound
1 2 3 4 5 o
L T t L T RVolume (veh/h)0 .Ul 181 25 416 0P9etslsqjqctor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95nsuny rtorrv KaIe (vg h)0 464 190 26 437 0Proportion of heavy
vehicles, Pru 0 11
Median tvoe
RT Channetized?
I lnliwidarl
0Lanes010010ConfigurationTRLTUpstream Signal 0 0Mlnor Street Northbd rn.l SouthboundMovementII1011 12
L T R L T RVolume lveh,lhl v 23 06^^r- L-- .- r-0 0gqNlr(,ur ractf|rr rHF o.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.s5Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)35 o 24 o 0 oProportion of heavy
vehicles, Pru I 0 9 0 n 0
Percent grade (%)0 0Flared approach N N
$qrage 0 0RT Channelized?0 0Lanes000000ConfigurationIR
Approach EB WB Northbound
'
r'' ' .': ,i't:'
I SouthboundMovemenl14aII101l 12Lane Configuration LT LR
Volume, v (vph)26 59
9gryity, c, (vph)892 305
v/c ratio 0.03 0.19
Queue length (95o/o)0.09 0.70
Control Detay (s/veh)9.2 19.6
LOS A
Approach delay (s/veh)79.6
Approach LOS c
HCs:ooorM Copyrigh O 200J Universuy of Floridr. All Rigirs Rcscry€d Vcaion 4.ld
:'
'_ rWo-wev srolienerarrtrrbrmanbF
rc()NTROL SUMMARY
Analyst EAGAgency/Co. Kinley_Hom
Date Performed 2/13/06
Analysis Time period . Toiat pM
I tntenection Frontage/Vll. West Lionshee
CirJurisdiclion Town of Vail
Analysis Year 2007
-
td
--lI
UoL S.'rterc I nrlna. nn ima^,.^^^-.^
tntersection One"taU l
Vbhiclq Volumes an lnoiuctn,anG:_Maior Street
lllovement 1 2
T
454
3 4
Westbound
I 5 6
y'olume lveh/h\R L T R
Peak-hnr rr fantnr ouc 0.95
124 ,t4 612 0
--:::= '_-.-'l ru
Houdy Flow Rate (veh/h)
0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95o47713046Proportion of hearry
v€hicles. PHV 0
644 0
t1 t-L
0
Median tvoe
RT Channelized?
t l^a!,.tJ-r
-anes 0 1Confinlrratinn 0 0 1 0
Upstream Signal 7iR LT
0 0Minor Street Norlhhorrnd SouthboundMovement7I
tr^t..-- r.__L L
:
T
10 11 12
R L T RvrJtutt|li lYt ltln I
|ir^-r. L^-- r t
114 0 12 0 n 0rsa|\-t tuul lixjlor, IJHF 0.95 0.95 0.95
12
0.95
0
0.95Hourly Flo\i, Rate (vehftr)t?n I
n
0.95
Proporlion of heavy
vehicles, Pru 12
0
12 0 0 0
Percent grade (%)0 0Flar€d approach N /vStorago00RT Channelized?0Lan€s 0
o
0 0 0 0 0C,onflgurat'on IR
rtiitl Ddlav.l.:tl
Approach EB WB Northbound
Movement I
loulhbound
4 7 I I 10 11 12Lane Configuralion LT TRr'olume, v (vph)46 132
Capacity, c" (vph)929 r77
v/c ralio 0.05 0.75
Queue length (9Eyo)0.16 4.76Control Delay (s/veh)9.1 68,6
LOS A r
Approach detay (s/veh)
68.6Approach LOS F
HcsJf@rM Copyiight G 20ol Univcrsiry of Ftorids. A Rights Reslrved Vcrsion 4.ld
o
TWO.WAY STOP GONTROL SUMMARY
t:enerar Intormatton Site Informatich
Analyst EAGAgency/Co. Kmley-Hom
Date Performed ZJ13/06
Anafysis Time Period Total AM
-
Intersection F rc nta geAA/. West Lion shead
CirJurisdiclion Town of Vait
Analysis Year 2007
rf uJ Ul uEucrf p on Lron Jquare Lodge: With impfovem1nts
East/Weslstreet: Souffi North/South Sheet: W. Wqst Lbnshead CircFtntgrsection orienta Study Period (hrs): 0.2i
Malor Steet Eastbound WestboundMovemenl12345 6
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h)0 441 181 25 416 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)0 464 190 26 437 0Proporlion of heavy
vehlcles, Pru 0 1l
lEldian type Two Wav Left Tum Lane
RT Channelized?0 0Lan€s 0 0 I 1 0ContlgurationrRLTUpstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound SoulhboundMovement7II1011 12
L T R L T Rvorurn€ (ven/h)u 0 23 0 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Hoqrly Flow Rate (veh/h)35 0 24 0 0 0Froponton oT n€avy
vehicles, Pru I 0 I 0 0 0
Percent grade (7o)0 0
Flared appmach N ru
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized?0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0ConfigurationLR
CorifollDelaV. Gitubue
Approach EB WB Northbound -.ar.-.r-ir..:--Southbound
Movement I 4 7 I o 10 11 12
Lane Configuratlon L tR
Volume, v (vph)26 59
Capacity, c, (vph)892 417
v/c ratio 0.03 0.14
Queue length (95%)0.09 0.49
Cqntrol Delay (siveh)9.2 15.1
LOS A c
Approach delay (s/veh)15.1
Approach LOS
Hcs2odM Copyright O 2003 UniErsiry of Ftori&, Alt Right, Rescrved .Version 4.ld
TWO.WAY STOP C(
General lnform
)NTROL S
lQi.^ r-3^;,
iUMMARY
mation
Analyst EAGAgency/Co. Kimley-llom
Date Performed ?J1g/06
Analysis Time Period Total pM
Intersection
Jurisdiction
F rontagerW. We st Lion sh ead
Cir
Town of Vail
lAnalysis Year 2007
"r:o+e# uf s:ietPn
=
uA squarc ,9r4|'
Lquu rreer eu EUL Doufr, ,-tt)nlaoa Hoeft
fntefsecnon t)rianlrli.rh. E^-t rtt^.t NgrtilSouttr Street ty. tyestZpnGIEffi
Major Street _|. Easibound WestborrndMovemenl12345 6LTRLTRVolume (veh/h)0 454 124 tH 612 0Peak*pqrfactor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Hourly Flow Rate (vefy'h)0 477 130 46 644 0Proportbn of heavy
vehicles, P*0 11
Median type I
RT Channellzed?0 0-anes 0 .l 0 1 ,]0uonflgural|on IR L TUpstream Signal 0 0Mlnor Street Northbound SouthboundMovement7II101'l t2LIRLTR/orume Iven/n)114 0 12 0 0 0Peak-hour fqctor, PHF 0.95 o.95 o.95 0.s5 0.95 0.95Hourly Flolv Rate (veh/h)120 0 12 0 0 0Proportion of heavy
vehicles, Pru 12 0 12 0 o 0
Percent grade (%)a 0Flared approach N NStorage00RT Channelized?o
0
0
0
L anes n 0 0 0ConfigurationLR
l: Dehv, QiiSue Eehiflh:rLevot of,S;Elca
Approach EB WB Northbound SouthboundMovementI4tII1011 12Lane Configuration L tR
Volumo, v (vph)46 132
Capacity, c, (vph)9m 309
v/c ralio 0.05 0.43
Queue length (95%)0.16 2.05
Control Delay (s/veh)9.1 25.1
LOS A
Approach delay (s/veh)25.1
Approach LOS
Hcs2ooorM Copyritht O 2ml thivcrsiry ot Florkl., All Rifhrs Rescrvcd V€rsion 4.ld
_ , TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
.r=aaoroa,,r,arr,,
Analyst EAcAgency/Co. Kmley-Hom
Date Performed 2/19/06
Analysis Tjme Period Total AM
I Intersection FrontageM. West Lionshead
Cir
I
Jurisdiction Town of. Vail
lAnalysis Year 2O2S
Lion Snttata I ndna. aa Jaa^.,^-^-.-
tnt"t*"ti"n Ott"rt"t l
North/South
Sfudv Perlor
-
ureet: Y!1 W6st LiorrsDead Crcle
| (hrs): 0.?sii ii,rYerIstE Ygtulneg anl r Adtus rtnerits ,.rr--
EaslboundMalor Street
Movement 1 2 3
rvcr!ruuu u
,-r. ,-^ ,. -- L rL
L
I 5 oTRLIRvvru rit tvt ltrll U 695 189 ZJ 618 0Peak-hour factor, pHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 ?.95 0.95 0.95nquny rrow Kare (veruh)0 731 198 26 650 0Proportion of heavy
vehicles, PHv 0 11
LMedlan Vpe
-
I laA rdded
RT Channelized?t--0Lanes0I0o10L;Onrtguratio!IR LTUpstream Signal 0 0Minor Street Northbound SouthboundMovement1oI1011 12LtRLTRr'olume (veh/h)44 0reak-hqut factor, pHF 0.95
23 0 0 00.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95{ourly Flow Rate (veh/h)46 24 0 0 0Proportion of heary
vehicles, P*I 0 9 0 0 0
Percent grade (7o)0 0Flared approach N N
9lglqse 0 0RT Channelized?0 In
anes 0 0 0 0 0ConflgurationIR
I'
Approach EB
o,
w6 Northbound SouthboundMovement148I1011 12Lane Configuratioh LT LR
Volume, v (vph)26 70
Capacity, cm (vph)701 154
v/c ratio 0.04 0.45
Queue length (95%)0.12 2.09
Control Delay (s/veh)10.3 46,5
LOS B E
lprygach detay (s/veh)46.5
Approach LOS E
Copyright O 2tl0J Unircr:iry of Florida. AllRighB Rcs€rvcd
HCs]ooorM
Veaion 4,ld
'a
TWO.WAY ST()P CONTROL SUMMARY
tJenerat Intormataon
Anatyst EAGAgency/Co. Kimley-Hont
Date Performed 2/15/06
Analysis Time Period Total pM
Prniont Flocrri^ri^^
ite Information
fnterseclion FrontageAA/. West Lionshead
CirJurisdiction Town of Vail
Anafysis Year ZO2S
tnlFfita! tt.\tt t trra North/Souttr srreet W. West Zlbnsh-6ffi
Vehicle Volumes and Adiubim
uruoy Period (hrsl: 0.25
Major Stseet Eastbound WestbounCMovement12345 oLTRLTRVoluryg (veh/h)0 765 135 a 834 0Peak{rour factor, pHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Hourly Flonr Rate (veh/lr)0 805 142 oo 877 0Proportion of heavy
*hld9g,P-0 1t
Median Upe
RT Channelized?
Undt
0lr
-anes 0 U 0 IConfigurationTRLTllstream Signal .0 0llllnor Street
Southbound '
7 I o 10 11 12LTRLTR/olume (veh/h)121 0 12 0 0 0!941-hourfactor, pHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95ld r.h' El^-, lt^.^ /..^Lr!)127 12 0 0 0Proporlion of heavy
vehides, PHu 12 0 12 0 0 0
Percent grade (%)0 0Flared approach ,v ,vStorage00RT Channelized?0 0anes0o0000ConfigurationLR
ilani 4..-..-
B.e:
Approach
t: LeJg! o'.-:,.....:,"1 : -..lll= i -EB WB Northbound SoulhboundMovement1478I1011 12Lane Configuration LT LR
Volume, v (vph)56 139
Capacity, c; (vph)689 74
v/c ratio 0.08 1.88
Queue length (95%)0.26 12.35
Conlrol Delay (s/veh)10.7 534.4
LOS B
Approach delay (s/veh)5U.4
Approach LOS F
Copydght @ 2003 Univcrsiry ofFlorida. All Righr, RclenldHcE2o@rM
Ve6ion 4.ld
v sror corur*ol SUMMARY
Ltenorat tntormation
n
Site Informatio;-
Analyst
Agency/Co.
Date Performed
Analysis Time Period
EAG
Kmley-llot
2/13/06
Total AM
lntersection Frontagel1t/. West Lbnshead
CirJurisdic{ion Town of Vail
Analysis Year 2O2S
Lion sntt4ra t ^d^a. i';+h i--^.. ---.^
Lfehlgle Vdludes am Adjustnents,
ilajor Street I Easbound Weslborrndrvr(,vEt Ittt'|I 't 2 3 4 5 IITRLTR
0
votume (vehih)0 695 lAO 25
0.95
618Pea!<{ourfuctor, pHF 0.95 0.95 0.95Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)0.95 0.95U731198266500Proportion of heavy
/ehicles, PHv 0 11
Vledian type I
Two Wav Lefr,lf--o*-]_-'um LaneRT Channelized?
0anesoI0t1Configuraliono
IR L TUpstream Signal 0 0Mlnor Stieet . Norlhbound SouhboundMovement7I9
L
IU 1^l 12
T R L T R[r^1,,E- /.,^LrL\r vrer rre t vst utt,
E'^aL |.^..- 3^J-- 6r rF 11 0 23 0 0 0rqull t. FnFil;:E:::;0.95 o.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95I rv\.rrt r tr.rw r\<lru (yetun,46 o 24 0 0 0Proportlon of healy
vehicles, P*9 0 9 0 0 0
Percent grade (%)0 0Flared approacfi N N
9!9raq"0 0RT Channelized?o 0Lanes00000or,unt[]utalton tR
srLqtttdllfiOEue .el
Approach EB WB I Northbound
.i . , .'..;,..t.r' .... r1_'.:!.,. ,
I SouthbormdMovement147II1011 12Lane Configuration L LR
Volume, v (vph)28 70
Capacity, c, (vph)701 382
v/c ratio 0.04 0.18
Queue length (95Yo)0.12 0.66
Controt Delay (s/veh)10.3 16.5
LOS B c
Approach detay (s/veh)16.5
Approach LOS
ncszoNN Copyright c 2003 UnivcEiry ofFlori\Ca. A Righb Rslcrv€d VeEion 4. I d
o
!
@unffi*rton
TWO.WAY STOP CI
-
)NTROL I
lQ:.l^. r-3--
Analyst EAGAgency/Co. Kimtey-Horn
Date Performed 2/13/06
Analysis Time period Totat pM
r F
I Intersection Frontage/W West Lionshead
CirJurisdictlon Town of Vai!
Analysis Year 2025
-
rr,"^*l*pr*ori*t rr"ffivihhim
Malor Street Fasthnr rnd WestboundMovement12345 6
R
o
L T R I T
8UVolume (veh/h)0 765 135 54Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 u.95 ooF 0.95 0.95 0.95Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)0 805 142 56 877 0Proportion of heavy
rehicles, P*u 0 11
Median type
| | ,wo way Len lum LaneRT Channelized?
Lanes 0 I
0 0
0 1 0
TR
nal L T
0 0Mlnor Street
SouthboundMovemenlI8I1011 12LTRLTRv! ur I rrt tv(ilt/n,
O^^L l.^.,- r^r^-
121 0 12 0 0 0I sq|\-t trrur tctutul. rnr
LI rrlr, El^... Frr- ,r..-L
0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Lrrrurry I tvw rlcnt (vgrull,127 0 12 0 0 0Proportion of heavy
vehicles, P*12 0 12 0 o 0
Percent grade (%)o oFlared approach N /vStorage0a
0
RT Channelized?0
Lanes U 0 0 0 0 0ConfigurationLR
ii.l:i.o;;ffi i,
Approach EB WB
'. ,. . : : .'.:Northbound I
' : : i,i ri .i.-lt. ,: :.'
SouthboundMovement1478I1011 12Lane Configuratlon L tR
Volume, v (vph)56 139
Capacity, c, (vtrh)689 309
v/c ratio 0.08 0.45
Queue length (957o)0.26 2.22
Control Delay (s/veh)10.7 25.8
LOS B D
Approach delay (stueh)25.8
Approach LOS D
Hcs:ooorM Copfight O 2001 Ltniv.$ity offlorkla. A Righrs Reservcd V.Bion 4.ld
o
"c,)NTROL SUMMARY
e€nerat tntornataon Site Information
Analyst EAcAgency/Co. Kmtey-Hom
Date Performed 2/19/06
Analysis Time Period Totat AM
-
P"/ua r|.r6.^d^r,^-
lnlersection FrontagelE, l/r'etst Lionshead
CirJurisdic{ion Town of Valt
Analysis Year 2OO7
. q,-i., -""i ,y.,v,, ; no ntFro!€ments
EQ444est Street: South Ftontaoe Roart -------------1
North/South Sheet: E lVesl Lrbnshead C,irclettt"rc"ati"r Or".It,lgy_PeEL (E9L_9.?0
WestboundMovement234o 6ITRLTRVolume (veh/h)429 35 86 404 0leak-hourfactor, PHF 0.95 o.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Hourly Flour Rate (veh/h)
[t, -^r:^-
v 451 36 90 425r rwPvr uvt I ut ltiavy
vehicles, P*0 16
Median type Undlvitlad
RT Channelized?l--o-0Lanes0I000ConfiguraiiorlTRLTUpstream Signal 0 0
Mlnor Street Northbound SouthboundMovement7891011 12
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h)37 0 155 0 0 0Peak-hour facto, pHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Hourty Flol Rate (vch/h)-38 0 163 0 n 0Proportion of heavy
i/ehicles, PHV 22 o 22 o 0 0
Percent grade (7o)0 0Flared approach N NStorage00RT Channelized?0 0Lanea000000uon!guratton tR
Delav,, QUeue.Length; Lev
Approach EB WB Northbound
' | ,i : tl..j:j: rl
SouthbarndMovementI47II1011 12Lane Configuration LT IR
Volume, v (vph)90 201
Capacity, c, (vph)1007 418
v/c ratio 0.N 0.48
Queue length (95%)0.29 2.54
Control Delay (siveh)d.Y 21.3
LOS A
Approach delay (sfueh)21.3
Approach LOS
Copyrighr @ 2003 Univcrsiry ofFtorida, AI Righrs Relcrwducszoofv
Versio[ 4.ld
_ TWO-WAY STOF
General ln
Analyst ;-Agency/Co. Kmley_Hom
Date Performed A8/06
Analysis Time Period Total pM
,ct }NTROL SUI
lSib lnfnrrha
I,IMARY
-
fiah
Intersectior
Jurisdiciion
Analysis Ye
, FrontryeE, West Lbnsheact
Cir
Town ot Vall
raf 2007
-
rrofeq UeSCnOtOn Lion fuuare I rvtaa. na i^^^,;;=.-
rlclg volumas anl I Adiuetm
malor Street
Weslbound
l516Movemenl1234
L T R L T Rvuruflrc (vgn/n,0 4N 37 98 600 0
0.95
Peak-hour factor, pFF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.s5 0.95Hourly Flow Rate (vehitr)0 451 38 103 631 0Proportion of heavy
vehicles, P*0 11
Median type
--r.-_1---IO 0
RT Channelized?
Lanss
Cnnfiar ralia.n
0 ,0 0 I 0IRLTglllg arr| ptgnal 0 0Mlnor Street
vruvetnenl 7 I I
L
lu 11 12TRLTRvvrut,|C| tv€r[t/Jt I
DaaL L-..- a^^.^- ^.
56 0 139 0 0 0t Ervlt ,. rrtr
l-lourly Flou/ Rate (veilh)
0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95
0
e,gg
0
58 0 146 0Propordon of heavy
vehicles, P"u 17 0 17 0 0 0
arcent grade (%)o 0Flared approacL N
Storage N
0 oRT Channelized?0
0
g
0
Lanes o 0 0 0ConfigurationtR
rv, QueuC Length, Levat of Sm
Approach EB WB Northbound SouthboundMovement14
Lane Configuralion
E I 10 1l
I 12
LT tR
Volume, v (vph)103 204C"p".,ty, c, (vph)1029 313
v/c ratio 0.10 0.65
Queue length (95%)o.33 4.27
Control Delay (s/veh)8.9 35.7
LOS A
Approach detay (s/veh)35.7
Approach LOS E
HCs2owm Colvrighr @ 2001 Uni|crsiry of Florira, All Righrs Rcscrwd Vcrsion 4.1d
i
TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUiiMARY
geneial Information ,
Analyst EAGAgency/Co. Kmtey-ttorn
Date Performed 2/13/06
Analysis Time Period TotalAM
o. ,a^r n^-^.,^$:; ----;=:--:l
lnterseclion
Jurisdiction Town of Vai!
Analysis Year 2OO7
I tvlv. vs-wttvt|vtt L,etr 9qua e L(,{EJe: no tmDnc rvetnet?ls
tra$Uvvesl Dlfeell 5Ol.r
lnlanaali^^ n -:^-.^!,'- -
En ,-rcnrf'ge Roacl
: E€sf.l,Yasl
NortlVSouth Street E. Wes, lionsiead Clhcle
Vghlcl
.fvr | \.rr tEr trauutl Sludy Period (hrs): 0.2S
e'-v.citqries:afid,t[slusttfirihtir , ..: . ,;' r:
Mdor Stre€t
-
EasDound WestboundMovement12345 6LTRLTRv9tuIItB [ven/n,0 429 35 86 404 0reaK-nour raclor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 o.95 0.95 0.95Hourly Flol Rate (veh/h)0 451 36 90 425 0Proportion of heavy
vehiclss, PHv 0 16
Median type Two Wav Left Tum Lana
RT Channelized?
0Lanes0I0II0onfigurationTRLTUpsfeam Signgl 0 0
Mlnor Str66t Norfrbound SouthboundMovement78I1011 12
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h)37 0 155 0 0 0Peak-hour fastor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)38 0 163 0 0 0Proportlon of heavy
vohicles, PHV 22 0 22 0 0 0
Percent grade (%)0 0Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized?0 oanea000000ConfigurationLR
v; aI|i'#l-6fitilfi t loridt i ser$;;,E]F .. t::.,iri,-.'
Approach EB WB Northbound SouthboundMovement147I91011 12Lane Configuration L LR
Volume, v (vph)90 201
Capacity, c, (vph)1007 490
v/c ratio 0.0s o.41
Queue length (95%)0.29 1.98
Control Delay (s/veh)8.9 17.4
os A
Approach delay (s/veh)17.4
Approach LOS
Hcs2ooorM Copyright O 2001 UniveEiry of Florila, A Righrs Rcscrved Vc6io|l 4, I d
Anafyst EAcAgenry/Co. Kmtey-Horn
Date Performed 2/1A/06
Anafysis Time pefiod Totat pM
Inlerseciion Frontaga/E. West ttonsneil
CirJurisdlctlon Town ot Vait
Anafysls Year 2AO7
rroJeq uescflolon
EastMest Sbeet: So
Intergection Orientatiorffi
Lion Sotnte I ndna. nn inaa,^^^^t^
uth
n:
Frontage Roa
East-West
-
t
z=s]'gEPJ?:!+,'.t!rl|xlt
Malor Street
ll.l:t . r: ir,j.-r L f ;itYt.,. i-
tsasttlo||nd I i i,' -' l -l' ,r.:.i
. :r1' : i.f:r :J -;.1: -: ::lf-T
;i 4 ,,-i i:. !,r.!.j. '.
,OUndMovement123
L
+c
T F'L T Rr'olume (vety'h)0 4N
Peak*rourfactor, pHF 37 98 &0 0
0.95
0.95 0.95 /1 0r 0.95
103
0.95Hourly Florr Rate (veh/ht 0 451 38Proportion of heavy
vehlcles, PHv
Median tlpe
0
631 0
11
,___ , Tvrc Way LeftTum LaneRT Ghannelized?0
1
0Lanes0101Configuratlon
I l^Gl'aah Cl^-^l
0IRLT
0 0Minor Strs€t N.tnhhor |n.l SouthboundMovement=_-r
I
L T
tv t1 12
R L T R/olume (veh/h)
faal,-h^' '- t^^.^- Frr rF
56
0.95
58
17
0 139 0 0 0
Jar rrkr Eta., Ear^ /..^Lrlr 0.95 0.s5 0.95 0-95 0.95+j=:lLlgr€ lvsr ur utrooatrtinn af haavw I
0
146 0 0 0t
vehlclos, PHv t7 0 0 0
Percent grade (%)0 0Flared approach N NStorage00RT Channelized?0
0
0Lanes0
Configuration 0 0 0tR
e hntrth.'l
;:"iApproachEBWB
7
Northboundf:--T-,SouthboundMovement1!
LLane Configunation 10 11 12
LR
Volume, v (vph)103 2U
Capacity, cm (vph)1029 428
v/c ratio o.10 0.48
Queue length (95%)0.33 2.51
Control Delay (s/veh)8.9 20.8
LOS A cApprgach detay (s/veh)20.8
Approach LOS c
ttcs2wow Copyright O 2003 Unir/crsiry of Florlta, All Rithts Reservcd Venion 4.ld
Qqneral ,nrormarF )P Cl )NTROL I
lG:4^ r-a^ -
TUMMARY_--
mationAnalyst EAGAgency/Co. Kmtey-Hom
Date Performed ?J1gO6
Anafysis Time period Total AM
ti,tlrt tltt{t,r
Inlersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
Cir
Town of Vait
2025
r I uJvr,r( Lrcscfiplfon UOn SeUArc Lodae: na itnnz,,,,o^^-t-
n(
Major Street --=-.=--:tsestbor rn.,l "j .:i .t .
Westbound
t5omentI34LT
654
6
Volume (veh/hl 0
R L T R
64 112
0.95
590
0.95
0reaK-nour laflor, }JllF 0.95 0-95 0.95Hourlv Flow Rala /rrah,lh\0 688 0.9567U7 | ozr 0Froponton of heavy
vehicles, Pru 0 16 t*I
0
l\ilodian type
RT Channelized?
tnes 0 U 0 1 0lonfiouration
Jpstream Signal TR LT
o 0Minor Street ffi
Movement 7 ff a'l
Uouthbound
L I
o
R
175
tu I1 12
Volume (velr/h)57
L T R
Peak-hour faclor, pHF o 0 0noa0.95 0.95Hottrlv Flnw Para /v-xHr 60
22
0.95 0.95 0.95--::;:4::-:l::l:!l
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, PHv
I
0
184 0 0 0
22 0 0 0
Percent grade (%)n 0Flared approach N
ry
0
Storage n
RT Channelized?0 0Lanes00o00vun gurauon rR
.t.ti^ri,?vrtu rr! rrlrlqv.
rpproach EB WB I r,rorrnfiund-T SouthboundMovement1478I1011 12Lane Configuration LT LRVolume, v (vph)117 244Capacity, c, (vph)796 218
v/c ratio 0.15 1.12Queue te!9rh (9S%)0.51 11 .33Control Delay (s/veh)10.3 143.4LOSB
Approach delay (s/veh)
143.4Approach LOS
F
HcstwrM Copyrighr @ 2003 Univeilily ofFlorida. Alt Righ{s Rcscrved Vcrsion 4, td
+'
I
OO
_ TWO-WAYSTOP
General lnformat
Analyst EAGAgency/Co. Kmley-Horn
Dato Performed A13/06
Analysis Time period Total pM
El-^i^-1 6^
!ertrr |l||L'rlnauon
I fntersection FrontqelE. WestI CirJurisdiclion Town of Vait
Analysis Year Z02S
Lionsh.ead
| | vlsr.r r.reuulptfgn uon Uquarc Ldde: no lmnrnwar'.oit^
Movement --f 1 2 g
R
!
L
5 6LT/^h,-^ r..^LrL\T Rvvrt tItq I yiit l/|| |0 AAN 117 178Peak-hour fnclnr pr.lE o.95 816 ou.t c 0.95 o.95 0.95 0.95rrvur ry rluw F(aIe (ven/n)0 694 123 187Proportlon of heavy
yehicles, P*0
858 0
Median type
Und,
I
RT Channelized?f-(Lanes 0 0
Confiouration
I 0 0 I 0
TR LTupsueam Slgnal 0
Mlnor Street n
-
Nnrihhnr rnd
[rovement 7 I I ,*--q?-12LTRTRuturr|e lverun 76 0 171 0reak-hour faclor, pHF 0.95 o 0
0,95
o.95 0.95 0.95 0.95loudy Flow Rate (veh/h)RN I
0
180)roportion of heavy
rehiCles, Psv 17
0 0 0
17 n 0
t)
0,ercent grade (%)0;lared approach N NStorage00RT Channelized?
0 0LC|| tlt!0 0 0:onfiguration 0 0IR
Appro rch
l;l o i€
Nnrlhhar rn,EB WB
. ! r :,". rt. i :" i, r, .i ,,,
SouthboundMovem€nt ,|4
Lane Confiouration I I 10 11 12LTLRYu|rrr||E, Y (VPt t'187 260Capacity, c, (vph)773 118
v/c ratio 0.24 2.20\r(seue rsr tgu | [YJ-/o,
l.t^-...|h.|-.,,.
0.95 22.15
\,r.,r [r ur utrtay (s/ven)I 1.1 628.1LOSB
Approach delay (s/veh)F
628.1Approach LOS F
ttcstoofM Copyrighl O 2003 Lhirersity ofFloridq, A RighB RescNed Vcrsion 4. I d
,r
lt l-J
I _ TWO-WAY STOP Cl
Generallnform
}NTROL I
lcir^ r-r^-
-U
IUMMARY
manon
Analyst EAGAgency/Co. Kmley-Hom
Dale Performed 2nAO6
Anafysis Time period Total AM
rra ug tt ltrvt
Intersection FrontagelE. West Lionsheact
CtrJurfsdiction Town of Vail
Anafysis Year ZO2S
frgeq!/escnpilon liofi
Easwvest Street Sor/t r
Intersection Orientatim::
Vehicle Volum'bs anr
' 9rye LodW; w ith I rnp rov e ne
rrontaEe Road
-
I Adiustmantr
,,.J
Major Stroet I Eastbound WestboundMovcmanl
1 2 3 4 5 oLTRLTR
0
Volume (veh/h)0 6&t u 112 590Peak-hourfactor, pHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
621
0.95
0
Houfly Flo , Rate (vet/h)0 688 67 117Proportion of heavy
vehlcles, P*0 16
Median type Ttta Want I tR Tttm t
RT Channelized?r---Lanes 0 0I0I1oConflgurationIRLTUpstream Signal 0 0Inor sreet Northbound Southbound
z
L
I 9 10 11 12
T R L T RVolume (veVh)57 0 175 0 0
0.95
0
0
0.95
Peak*rourfactor, pHF o.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
0
Hourly Flovv Rate (veh/h)60 0 1AProportion of heavy
vehicles, P*22
0
0 22 0 0 .0
Percent grade (%)0 0Flared approach ,v NStorage00RT Channelized?0 0anes101000vur |ltgllrauo{l L R
y, eutuo Leiigth, LeveLo ---""""_.-?::F'-?-
Approach EB WB Northbound SouthboundMovement14I
L
I I 10 11 12Lane Configuraflon L RVolume, v (vph)117 60 184Capccity, c, (vph)796 213 395
v/c ralio 0.15 0.28 0.47
Queue length (95%)0.51 1.11 2.40Control Detay (s/veh)10.3 28.4 21.8LOSBDcApproach delay (stueh)23.4
Approach LOS
ncs:ooorM Copyritht O 2003 Universiry of fbrik. A Righrs Rcscrv€d Vcrsion4.l(l
/{'TWO.WAY STOP CONTRQL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst EAA
Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn
Date Performed 2/13/06
Analysis Time Period Total PM
lntersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead
Clr
Jurisdiction Town of Vail
Analysis Year 2025
Proiect Description Llon Square Lodge: with lmprovements
EastMest StreeL South Fronta ga Road North/Soulh Street: E West Lionshead Circle
lntersection Orientation: Easl-Wesl Study Period hrs): O25
Vetrlcte Volumes,and AdiustnrOnts,
Maior Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement I 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)0 660 117 178 816 0
Peak,hour faclor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flour Rate (veh/h)0 694 123 187 858 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, P*0 11
Median type TwoWay Lefr Turyylqry
RT Channelized?0 0
Lanes 0 0 1 I 0
Conffguration 7'iR L T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 I I 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)76 0 171 0 0 0
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Ftoriv Rate (veh/h)80 0 180 0 0 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, Pru 17 0 17 0 0 0
Percent grade (%)o 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized?0 0
1 0 t 0 0 0
Configuration L R
v. qiittu'C'
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 I 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L L R
Volume, v (vph)187 80 180
Capacity, c, (vph)773 244 385
v/c ratio 0.24 0.33 0.47
Queue length (95%)0.95 1.37 2.41
Control Delay (s/veh)'t ,, ,l 26.8 22.3
LOS B D c
Approach delay (s/veh)23.7
Approach LOS
ucszQodM Copyright O 200! uni\€6iry olFloride, All RiEhls Resc|cd Vr6ion 4.ld
o
V-fl Kimley'Horn
\I7 \ ano Assoctales, Inc,
June 15,2006 T
sulte 1050
S0 Sevsaonh gcel
Dfivor, C&rado
M2Town of Vail Public Works/Transportation
1309 Elkhorn Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Atbn: Thomas E. Kassmel
Re: Lion Square lodge North
Lionshead Village, Vail, Colorado
Dear Mr. Kassmel:
Thig letter has been prepared to document the results of a traffic impact
ar]alysis of future traffic conditions associated with the proposed exparuion
of the Lion Square Lodge North. The Lion Square Lodge North islocated
along the east side of Lionshead Place in Lionshead ViJlage in Vail,
Colorado. Specifically, this study provides an update to the February 2006
analysis that included development of up to L2 condominium/ towhnhome
units, The expansion of the existing site is currently anticipated to include 9
new condominium/ townhome units and 550 square feet of additional retail
use. The vicinity map illustrating the project location is shown in Figure l,
attached.
The purpose of this letter is to idenfify trip generation characteristics to
determine potential traJfic related impacts on the local skeet system, and to
develop:nitigation measures as may be necessary as a result oj Lion Square
Lodge North Condominiums project impacts. This study has been prepared
in accordance with Town of Vail standards and includes Level of Service
(LOS) analysis for study area intersections. This study specifically includes
evaluation of the following key intersections that will provide haffic access
to the project from the South Frontage Road:
South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (east portal)
South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (west porhl)
t
o
The project is currently proposed to include development of 9
condominium/ townhomeunits and 650 square feet of retail use on the site
of the existing Lion Square Lodge. A conceptual site plan is attached.
I
TEt 303 26 m
FAX 3m 4,{6 8678
V-n Kimley-Horn
LJI/ \ ano Assocrargs. rnc.
Ml Thomas E. I(assmel, lune 15, 2005, Page 2
I Institute of rransportation Engineers, Trip Generation: An Infonnation Report,
Seventh Edition, Washington DC, 2003.
For analysjs purposes, it is assumed that the Lion Square Lodge North
project will be complete around year 2002, and,was therefore anatv""a "rihthis horizon. The analysis of a long-term 2025 horizon is also included
within this study, as required by the cbbrado Department of Transportation
(cDoT).
Regional access to the Lion Square Lodge North is provided W l:20.
Primary access will be gained from the south Frontage Rbad. Direciaccess
to the lroject will be provided by two driveways along Lionshead place.
south Frontage Road is a cDor roadway (classification F-R) with one bavel
lane in each direction. It ruru along the south side of Interstate 70.
Primarily, the frontage road is located north of Lionshead Vilage. The
:,o-udry1y has a speed timit of 25 rniles per hour through the projict area.
west Lionshead Circle serves as a collecior roadway with one lane of travel
in each direction. Both east and west portal interdtions of west uoruhead
circle with the south Frontage Road ire stop controlled on the minor street
approach with free flow movemmts arong the Frontage Road. Existing lane
configurations and kaffic control at the key intersections studied are shown
in Figure I attached.
To accurately determine theimpact of the Lion square Lodge North project,
5{!i. "g!M expected at the time of projectbuildoutwere necessary. The
2007 and212ibackground pre developmint traffic volumes were obiained
from the Ritz-carlton Residencesat vail rraffic Impact study completed in
october 2005 by Ki*ley Hom and Associates, Inc. The total irafficiolumes
from the Ritz-carlton Residences at vail study were obtained from the vailResorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Mastei plan Traffic Impact studp
Kimley-Hom and Associates, September 1g 2003. These volumes *ur" ,r*d
as_the background balfic volumes for this study, Background traffic
volumes for 2007 are shown in Figure 3. Background traffic volumes for
2025 are shown inFigure 4.
site-generated traffic estinates are determined tfuough a process known as
trip generation. Rates are applied to proposed land uses to estimate trafficgenerated by developments during a specific time interval. The
acknowledged source for trip generation ratei ir th" .*t"r,t edition of the
Trip .&neration Reporfi published by tnstitute of rransportation Engineers
(lrE). ITE has established bip rates in nationwide st'dies of similir land
1""?- Th. ITE Trip Generation Report average trip rates that apply to
Residential condominium/Townhouse (230) were used to estimate tratfic
generated by the condomigyms, Trip generation for the retail space was
determined using ITE Land use Code: specialty Retail (E14) for the'pM peak
o
Mr. Tlnmas E. Kasstnel, Jutrp 75, 2N6, Page iV-fl xrmrttt''H^rn
\lIZl andAssociates,lnc.
hour, ITE does not provide trip generationrates for this land use for the AM
peak hour. Therefore, moming hip generation rates provided in the
Lionshead Redevelopment Masterplan for Specialty Retail were used.
Table 1 summarizes the estirnated traffic generation for the Lion Square
Lodge North. The trip generation worksheets are attached. These
calculations illusbate the rates used and drrectional distribution of trips.
Table 1 - The Lion Square Lodge North hoject Traffic Generation
The February 2006 trafficimpact analysisassumed developmentolup to f2
condomium/ townhome units on the site. This analysis found that the
project would be accommodated on the existing zurrounding street network
without any improvemmta. Since the current proposal contains 3 less units
than the original study, it is believed that the analysis presented herein is
conservative. Therefore, the analysis was not revised per the current
development plan and resultant hip generation.
Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the distribution
developed and approved previously within the Lionshead Village Tralfic
Impact-Studies. Figure 5 illustrates the expected proiect trip disiihtio,nfor
the Lion Square Lodge North. Traffic assignmentwas obtained by aPPlylng
the distributions to the estimated baffic generation. Proiect traffic
assignrnmt for the Lion Square Lodge North project is shown in Figure 5.
Lion Square Lodge North traffic volumes were added to the background
volumes to represent estimated traffic conditions for full project
development. Total haffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 7 for the 2007
horizon and Figure 8 for the 2025 horizon.
Kirrley-Horn s analyses of baffic operations in the site vicinity were
conducted to determine Potential capacity deficiencies in the 2007 arrd2025
development horizons. The background (pre development) traffic volumes
have been studied previously as the total (background plus project) traffic
volumes in the Ritz{arlton Residences at Vail traffic irnpact study' Results
from this analysis are shown for informational purposes. These horizons
AMPeakHour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Totd
Condominium
(9 units)1 3 4 3 2 5
Retail
(650 square feet)0 0 0 1 1 ,
Total 1 3 4 4 3 7
Tlffl Niilrey-notn
\I/ \ anoAssocnres.rnc.
Mr. Thontas E. Kassnel, June 15, 2006, Page 4
were studied with the addition of Lion Square Lodge North project traffic.
The acknowledged source for determining overall capacity is the current
edition of the Highzoay Capacity ManuaP,
Capacity analysis results are listed in terms of level of service (LOS). LOS is
a qualitafive term describing operating conditions a driver will experience
while traveling on a particular sheet during a particular time interval; It
ranges from A (very little delay) to F (long delays and congestion). The
Town of Vail recommends LOS C or better as the measur'e of desirable level
of service and LS D as acceptable level of service during the peak hours,
The intersection operations at key intersections were analyzed using the
unsignalized analysis methodologies found in the Higlnuay eprcity lvInruulz
(HCM) using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS 2000) prograul Release
4,1, The following provides a discussion of the level of service results on an
intersectio+by-intersection basis (calculations attached). Level of service is
shown for both of the study intersecfions using the existing intersection
geometry as well as with improved geometry. It is important to note that the
critical gaps were modiJied to demonstrate the needed gap acceptance
differences created by the installation of left tum acceleration lanes at the
subject intersections. The critical gap for left turns exiting from the side
streets was matched with those for the left tums entering from the frontage
road. These gaps would be similar since these both cross the eastbound
traffic. This was done to most accurately model intersections with
acceleration lanes.
South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (west portal)
The West Lionshead Circle (west portal) approach to this unsignalized
intersection of the South Frontage Road is expected to operate at
unacceptable level of service in the short term 2007 future prior to the
addition of Uone Square Lodge Northproject traffic. This is due to the
expected traffic volume increases anticipated by the Lioruhead
Redevelopment projects. The results indicate that the northbound left
turning vehicles may find it difficultto enter the South Frontage Road due to
the high through volumes along the frontage road. An improvementto the
intersection that is needed based on the Lionshead Redevelopment projects
and prior to the addition of Uons Square Lodge North project traffic
includes the construction of a left turn lane along the South Frontage Road.
Construction of this left turn Iane along the frontage road is anticipated to
improve operations of the minor street approach by allowing left turn
vehicles to enter the Frontage Road more easily by having a designated lane
2 Transportation Research Board, Higlnoay Crpacity Mawnl, Special Report 209.
Washington DC,20fr).
o
Mr. Thomas E. Kassnel, Juru 15, 2006, Page 5
or refu€e area to turn into before merging with through westbound traffic.
In addition, per the State Access Code, both eastbound right turn and
westbound left fum lanes from the South Frontage Road are warranted at
this intersection. With these improvements, all movements at this
interspction are expected to operate acceptably in the near terrr and long
term horizons, with or without the addition of project traffic. If adequati
right-of-way is available, the Town of Vail may wish to considei the
designation of separate left and right tum lanes from the minor street
approach to this intersection, This improvement is not needed based upon
level of service analysis, but would improve the overall operations ofthe
intersection. Table 2 provides the level oI service results at oris intersection,
Table 2 - south Frontage Road/west Lionshead circle (west portal) Los Resulb
South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (east portal)
A westbound left turn lane was found to be required at this intersection in
2007 prior to project development based upon State Highway Access Code
requirements for category F-R roadways, With this irnpiovemen! this
ynslgJral=e{east portal intersectionof the South Frontage Road with West
Lionshead circle is gticipated to continue to operate *ith un acceptable
Ievel of service in 2007with and without the addition of project traffic
Prior to the addition of project traffic in 2025, separate northbound left and
right turn lanes aloag west Lioruhead circle are anticipated to be needed to
maintain acceptable level of service, [r addition, a right tum deceleration
lane is anticipated to bewarranted by 2025 based uponiedevelopmentof the
7t-fl Nrrsr-flofllL"IZ-I anqAssocnres,rnc,
Scenario
Without Proiect With hoiect
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay
(seq/teh)LOS Delay
(seqtueh)LOS Delay
(seq,/veh)LOS Delay
(geqtueh)LO9
2007 Short Term
Without Impmvementg
Westburul Approach
Northbound Approach
9.2
19.6
A
c
9.1
67.7
A
F
9.2
19.5
A
c
9.7
ffi.6
A
F
2007 Short Term
With Improvements
Westbound Lefl
Northbounil Approadt
9.2
15.0
A
c
9.1
25.0
A
c
9.2
15.1
A o1
?5.1 D
2025 Long Term
Without Improvement8
Westbound Approadt
Northbounil Approadt
10.3
46.5
B
t1
70.7
52L3
B
F
10.3
46.5
B
E
10.7
534.4
B
F
2025 Long Term
With Improvementg
Westbound l-eft
Northbound Approadt
10.3
16.5
B
C
10.7
8.7
B
D
10.3
16.5
B
C
70.7 .
25.8
B
D
7,.-fl rrmrsy-Horr\IZ_l anqAssocff€s.rnc.
Mr. Thonas E. Kre*ncl, lune 15,2006, Page 6
North Day Lot as identified in the Lionshead Redevelopment TraIIic Impact
Study. Table 3 provides the level of sewice resuls at this intersection-
Table 3 - South Fronhge Road/West Lionshead Circle (east portal) I.oS Results
Based on the analysis presented in this report, Kimley-Horn believes the
Uon Square Lodge North projea traffic will be zuccessfully incorporated
without any additional improvements needed beyond whathas previously
been idmtified with the Lionshead Redevelopment project If you haveany
questions relating to this analysis, please call meat (303) 22en04.
Sirrcerelp
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOSATE9, INC.
/ o't-,./',',lu L/ /(z.tI alwv'( -. t-'(
iurtis D. Rowe, P.E., PTOE
Associate
Scenario
Without Proiect Wlth Ptoject
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay
(sey'veh)LOS Delay
(se{veh)LOS DeIay
(seq/Veh)LOS Delay
(seqlveh)LOS
2ID7 Short Term
Existing Roadway
Westbound Approach
Northbound Awroach
8,9
m.7
A
c
8.9
u.6
A
D
8.9
n.3
A
c
8.9
35.7
A
E
2007 Short Term
With Imprwementc
Watbound Izfi
Northbound Approach
8.9
77.1 c
8.9
25.4
A
c
8.9
77.4
A
c
8.9
20.8
A
2025 Long Term
Exleting Roadway
Wutbwntl AVproadr
Northbsund Apfioach
10.3
!4.4
B
r
11.1
5927
B
f
10.3
143.4
B
tr
11.1
6n1
B
I
Z)25 Long Term
With IBprovements
Westbound l-eft
Northhund lcfi
Northbouttil Risht
10.3
27.8
n.6
B
D
c
11.1
?53
20
B
D
c
10.3
7l.4
21.8
B
D
c
11.1
26.8
22.3
B
D
oo
xls 096o20,oQ0
j------*""-
ir::sw
t_"_._
_.if i-'--i fl\l r;.r-.i i*:j ii.# *''t --j /vul8 Ir'- ""1 ii r-i
\",1? r,i.; i
"" I i *-j
! "o*'*"^ I ,_."_ lj
l;..::;.. ii--,-'.,/ '-,' ," -'"*
',,
I,
..* I I
FIGURE 1
iid6strl
LION SQUARE LODGE NORTH
SITE LOCAT]ON
K:;:,*
,,'rA,..;:i,ffi$
'i1""'
,
il-'-::---'-''t
i relrNs@tr il$r:i;ti1r-... i\,,
n-fra Kimtey-Hom\f Z-l ano Assocnres, nc.
oo
$#J$'"*
---':': ': : '
o
r(".)
E
LEGENET_
Sludy Area Ksy lntersBclign
Stop Cantrolled Approoch
Roadway Speed Limil
LION SQUARE LODGE NORTH
EXISTING LANEAGE AND CONTROL FIGURE 2
d
ZlITl Kimley.Hom
\lI7 \ aM Associates, Inc
o o
ffi
/ ..i'\.
/ ....-..: '.. $n{D!\.
,,i vrr"s"^,,,,. .,...
,.,,,
.;, Atit.,
1 ,.\ i: i ; ,l', r itRcue'{'i ,b-
LEGEND
a Study Arsa Koy IntsrEectlon
XX(XX) AM(PM) Peak Hoo. Tramc Volurn6
LION
2007
oo
LEGEND
O Study Area Key Intersgclion
XX(XX) AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volurn€s
LION SQUARE LODGE NORTH
2025 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 4
r\loFl-T-H
".,;''
vNr 8P,.,4,,"i
"-ri l,
l-ti'.,9
V-F| Kimtey-Horn
\'I7 \ and Associares. Inc.
I o
a\oR-rFl
NTS 0S6020.000
coRa |afl
!i
ii.
iiti1i
I
A'r
"/,
LEGEND
O Study Ares Key Intersection
XX%(XX%) Entering (Exiting) Trip Disldbution
LION SQUARE LODGE NORTH
PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 5
-,t vltt sA -, ..
,1' ..;" -1 .,,"'
i.,r'i i+ - l..it. i.!tiii.q
I7I Kimley+lorn
f Z \ and Associates, lnc.
o
t\of=-rH
}{Is oaSogto@
S,fSS'"^' '
LEGEND
O Study A.sa l(ey Intersection
XX(XX) AM(PM) Peak Hour T|'affic Votumag
LION SQUARE LODGE NORTH
PROJECT THAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
FIGURE 6
, ,**
-... -r't \ ,e*4pr....
,.,'^vr,tr'an,,,,,.
t'., .,.'' i iit ;
.i1 iJ' ',,,'cW
:;'g:,-ri -i
7lIJl KimlerHom
\jI/ \ and Associates.lrrc.
"\t o
htoFr-rH
t{rs 006020.0@
ffiffi',,,K,ii Vir.ivii
,.t-"!l' !__1 -. .-..r j
,l rx[e's . f !-' -' -'
I
.i
LEGENQ
a Stuay Are€ Ksy Int€rsection
XX(XX) AM(PM) Pssl lbur Trafiic Vqlunes
LION SQUARE LODGE NORTH
2OO7 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 7
,#6@'*,r*i,1
\n
ZlITl Kimley-Hom
\I/ \ am Associaies. 'mc
o
Kimloy'Horft
and Assoclabs, lnc
Trip Gsnslatign
June 15.2006 096020000
Checked by
rRtp GENERATTON MANUAL TECHNTOUqS
ITE Trip Generalion Manual 7th Edition, Averue Rate
Land Use Cocle - Residential CondominiunyTownhouse (230)
Independant Variable - Dwelling Unib (X)
[= I
T = Average Vehicle Tdp Entls
Directional Disfibution; 67010 ent. S'% exit.
(T) = 0.52 (X) J = s Average Vehicle Trlp Ends(T)=0.52t 9.0 3 enterlrE 2 exitirE
3+l=5
Lion
Peak Hour of Adlacent streot rBtflc. on€ Hour Botween 7 and g a.m. (paoe 368)
Directional Distribuflon: 17yo ent. 8it% edt.
[D = 0.44 (X) f = 4 Average Vehicle Trip Ends
[t)= 0.44 * 9.0 1 entering 3 ar<itirB
1+3=4
Peak Hour of Adlacent street Tramc. ono Hour Botwsen 4 and 6 o.m. (paoe 3091
G:1
ftfl KirnW.HomL-nf \ andAisociates, hc.
Prcject
Subject
Lion
|flD eneration br at Lion
Designecl by
Checked W
February 13,2006 No. 096020000
Date Sheet No. 'l ot 1
TRIP GENERANON MANUAL TECHN]QUES
ITE Trio Generation ManuAl 7th Edition, Averege Rate Equations
Land Use Code . Specialty Retrail Center (814)
Independant Variable - 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area (X)
X = 0.65
T = AverageVehicle Trip Ends
AM Peak Hour of Adiacent Street Traffic. trates fiom Llonshsad Masterplant
Average Weekday
entering (T6) = 0.'l1 (X)
exiting (To,,J = 0.07 (X)
entedng (T'n) = 0.11 - (0.7)
exiting (Tod = 0.07 " (0.7)
O)= o
(Tin) = 0 entering
(T.,J = 0 exiting
Peak Hout of Adlacent Street Tmffic. One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. loaoe l33gl
Average Weekday
O) = 2.71 (X)
A=2.71.
Directional Distribution: 43a/o ent. 57%| = 2 Average Vehicle Trip EndsI entering 'l exiting
exit.
(0.7)
Peak Hour of Generator. Saturdav {oaoe 1338}r
ff) = 4.432 (X)
(T) = 4,432'(0.7)
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50o/o exitingf = 2 Average Vehicte Trip Ends1 entering 1 exiling
'peak hour of gonerator on Salurday assumed to b 10% of dally
TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY,':
lSite Information 'General lnformation
Analyst EAG
Agency/Co. KimleY-Horn
Date Performed 413/06
Analysis Time Period Total AM
FrontagaMl' West Lion sheact
f ntersection Cir
Judsdiction Town of Vail
Analysis Year 2007
F*i*r oescriotion Lion Sluare Lodge: no inproyqrngntj-
treet: W. West Lionshead CircleEastMest Street: South Frontage Road Nnrth/Sortth S
Studv Period (hrs): 0.25lntersectionOrientation: Easl-l' esl
Vehi ^l- rr^l'.aaa anrl A,r.ili rralrnanf,cliltt Y lrl lla afva, 911ts
Maior Street Eastbound vvli)lvt ul llr
Movement 1 z 3 4 5
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)0 441 181 25 416 0
Peak-hour factor, PHf 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourlv Flow Rate (veh/h)n 464 190 26 437 0
Proportion of heavY
veh'tcles, Pru 0 11
Median type Undi ictect
RT Channelized?
0
Lanes 0 'l 0 0 1 0
Configuration IR LT
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 I 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (vehi h)u 0 23 0 0 0
Peak-hourfactor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (vehi h)35 0 24 0 0 0
Proportion of heavY
vehicles, PHV
I 0 9 0 0 0
0Percent grade (%)0
Flared approach N N
SI
0
RT Channelized?0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 u
Configuration IR
^^-..^r n^tov tllriiiiiii l..anirrth I eve I ol. SeiViCe
ADDroach I EB WB Northbound Soulhbound
Movement | 1
.,8 Y 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
votume,v(vph) | | 26 59
Capacity, c,.(voh) I I Age 305
v/c ratio 0.03 0.19
Queue length (95%)0.09 0.v0
Controt Delay (s/veh)9.2 19.6
LOS A
Approach delaY (s/veh) I -19.6
Approach LoS I -
HCs]oootN copyflghlC) 1003 Unircrsity of Florida. All Rights Reserved Version 4.ld
oo
TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Site Information
Analyst EAGAgency/Co. Kimtey-Hom
Date Performed pl13/06
Analysis Time Period Total pM
Intersection FrontageM. West Lionshead
CirJurisdiction Town ot Vail
Analysis Year 2007
rrqjecr uescnprloll uon ttquare Lodge: no imorovements
EastMe"tStreel: Soffi NorthiSoulh Street: W. West Lionshead CircleInteFectiol Orientation: Easf-Wosl Study Period (hrs): 0.25
VEhicle Volumes anr
]U|alor Dlreef Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 o
L T K L T KVolume (veh/h)0 454 124 44 612 0Peak+lour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 o.95 0.95 0.95Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h )0 477 130 46 &4 0Proportion of heavy
vehicles, P"u 11
Median type Undlvlded
RT Channelized?0 0LAnes0o010ConfigurationrRLT
Upstream Signal n 0
Minor Street Northbound SouthboundMovement'a B 10 't1 12
L T R L I RVolume (veh/h)114 n az 0 UPeak-hour factor, PHF U.YC u. vo 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)120 0 12 0 0 0Proportion of heavy
vehicles, Pru 12 0 12 o 0
Percenl grade (%)0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized?0 0Lanes0000a0ConfigurationLR
iot oetav, Queu6 [rin-qth, t_evet OfEEwice
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movemenl 1 A 7 8 o 10 11 12
Lane Configuration ta
Volume, v (vph)46 132
Capacity, c, (vph)929 177
v/c ratio 0.05 0.75
Queue length (95%)0.16 4.76
Control Delay (s/veh)9.1 68.6
LOS A F
Approach detay (s/veh)68.6
Approach LOS F
HCy0O0rNl Copyright 6 2003 Unive[srty ot'floridt. All Righb Rcscryed Vcrsion 4.ld
TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst EAGAgency/Co. Kimley-Horn
Date Performed 2J13/06
Anafysis Time Period Total AM
f nterseclion F,rontagerW. West Lionshead
CirJurisdiction Town of Val!
Analysis Year 2007
rl et ur Lrescrlpuo! uon 5quare Lodqe: With imDrovementsg".VW"st Sir"Norlh/South Street: W. West Lionshead CircleInljrsection Orient st-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehiile Volumes and,AdiqstrnenG
lU4[or ,$treet WestboundMovemenl12J45 o
L T rt L T RVolume (veh/h)0 441 181 25 416 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 u.y3 0.95 0.95 0.95 noF
Hourly Flow Raie (veh/h)n 464 190 26 437 0Proporlion of h€avy
vehicles, P*0 11
$edian type Two Wav Left Tum Lane
RT Channelized?0 0Lanes0I01I0ConfigurationIRLT
Upslream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound SouthboundMovementI891011 12
L T R L T r(Volume (veh/h)34 0 23 0 0 0
leak-hourfactor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)35 0 24 n 0Proportion of heavy
vehicles, Pru v 0 I 0 0 0
Percent grade (o/o)0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized?0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 U 0ConfiguralionLR
)ontiolD lpqqe Length;:;LeVel of Service,
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movemeni 1 4 8 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L tR
Volume, v (vph)26 JY
Capacity, c, (vph)892 417
vic ratio o.03
Queue length (95%)0.09 0.49
Control Delay (s/veh)9.2 15.1
LOS A
Approach delay (s/veh)15.1
Approach LOS
LJC52000tEl Copy.rghl C 2001 Univcrsrry of Florida, Alt Righls Rescrvrd Versaon 4.ld
TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Site Information
Analyst EAG
Agency/Co. Kimley-Hom
Date Performed 213/06
Analysis Time Period Tatal PM
f ntersection FrontageM. West Lionshead
Cir
Jurisdiction Town of Vail
Analysis Year 2007
Proiect Descriplion Lion Square Lodge: with improvements
EasUwest Street: South Frontaoe Road North/South Street: & West Lionshead Circle
Intersection Orientation: Easf-Wesf Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Votufies and, Adiugtments
Maior Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 o
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)n 454 124 44 612 0
Peak-hour factor, PHF 4.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourlv Flow Rate (veh/h)477 130 46 u4 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, Pnu 0 ,l
Median type Two Way Left Tum Lane
RT Channelized?0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 1 I 0
Configuration 7tR L T
Upstream Siqnal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbouncl
Movement 7 I 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)114 0 12 0 0 0
Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h 120 0 12 0 0 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, Pru 12 0 12 a 0
Percent grade (7o)0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized?0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 n
Configuration tR
iervice
Approach EB WB I Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 c 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L LR
Volume, v (vph)46 132
Capacity, cn'' (vph)929 309
v/c ratio 0.05 0.43
Queue length (95%)0.16 2.05
Control Delay (s/veh)9.1 25.1
tr\a
Approach delay (siveh)-- I 25.1
Approach LOS D
Cbpyr)ght @ 2001 Unr!c|sity of Florida. All Rights R€s€ryed Velsion 4. 1dItcsloootM
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst EAG
Agency/Co. Kimley-Hom
Date Performed A13/06
Analysis Time Period Totat AM
lntersection FrcntageM. West Lionshead
Cir
Jurisdiction Town of Vail
Analysis Year 2025
Proiect Descripiion Lion Square Lodge: no improvements
EasVWest Street: Soulh Frontage Road North/South Slreet: W. West Lionshead Circla
lntersection Orientation: Easl-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments
Maior Street Easlbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 o
L T R L T R
Volume (vehih)0 695 189 25 618 0
Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 o.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)0 731 198 26 650 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, Pru 0 11
Median type Undivided
RT Channelized?0 0
Lanes 1 0 0 I 0
Conflguration rR LT
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Norihbound Southbound
Movement 7 I I 10 11 12
I T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)44 23 0 0 0
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)46 0 24 0 0 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, PHV I 0 I 0 0 0
Percent grade (%)0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized?0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration to
Control'Detiy, Queue Lensth, Leiiel of Servlce ' .' :
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 7 I o 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT tR
Volume, v (vph)to 70
Capacity, c,n (vph)701 154
v/c ralio 0.04 0.45
Queue length {957o)0.12 2.09
Control Delay (s/veh)10.3 46.5
LOS B E
Approach delay (s/veh)46.5
Approach LOS E
Copyri!ht O Z(Dl Llnivcisiry of Florida. All Rights ReselvedHCStoodM V€Jsron 4, ld
o
TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst EAGAgency/Co. Ktmley-Horn
Date Performed A13/06
Analysis Time Period Total pM
lntersection FrontagerW. West Lionshead
Cir
Jurisdiclion Town of Vail
Analysis Year 2025
Project Description Lrbn Sguare Lodge; no rmprovemenfs
EastMest Sheet: Soufh Frontage Road North/South Street: l/V. West Lionshead Ckcle
lnlersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and- AdiustOents
Major Stre€t Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 3 4 5 o
L _r
R T R
Volume (veh/h)765 135 54 834 0
Peak-hour iactor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)0 805 142 56 877 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, P"u 0 11
Median type Undivided
RT Channelized?0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 I 0
Configurqtion IR LT
Jpstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 I 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)121 0 12 n 0 0
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)127 12 0 0 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, PHV 12 12 0 o
Percent grade (0/6)0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0
RT Channelized?0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Approach'EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 A I n 9 10 11 't2
Lane Configuration L'tR
Volume, v (vph)56 139
Capacity, cm (vph)689
v/c ratio 0.08 1.88
Queue lenglh (95%)u-zo 12.35
Control Delay (s/veh)10.7 534.4
LOS E
Approach delay (s/veh)534.4
Approach LOS F
Copyfight O 2001 Unrverciry of Ftofida, All RigIts Rcsen"dacszoofM V.fsioo 4.ld
o
TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General lnformation Site lnformation
Analyst EAG
Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn
Date Performed 2/13/06
Analysis Time Period Total AM
Intersection Frcntage/W. West Lbnshaad
CirJurisdiction Town of Vail
Analysis Year 2025
Projecl Description Lion Square Lodge: with improvements
EasVWest $treel Soulh Frontage Road North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle
Intersection Orientation: Easi-Wesl Study Period (hrs): O25
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement ,|I 5 o
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h )0 695 189 25 618 0
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0-95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)0 731 198 zo 650 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, PHV 0 11
Median type lw9 Way LelTurn Lane
RT Channelized?0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 I I 0
Configuratlon TR I T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement I I 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)44 0 ZJ 0 0Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 no4 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)46 0 24 0 0 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, Pnu I 0 9 0 n
Percent grade (%)0
Flared approach N
Slorage 0
RT Channelized?0 0
Lanes n 0 0 0 0
Qonfiguration LR
Movemenl 'I 4 7 8 I 10 11 't2
Lane Conftguration I LR
Volume, v (vph)26 70
Capacity, c, (vph)701 382
vlc 'atio 0.04 0.18
Queue length (95o/o)0.12 0.66
Control Delay (s/veh )10.3 16.5
LOS B
Approach delay (s/veh)16.5
Approach LOS
t.tcs2ooorM Copyrighr @ 2001 Universily otFtorida. All Rights Rsserved version 4.ld
TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eenerat lnfo
Analyst EAGAgencyiCo. Kmtey-Horn
Date Performed 213/06
Analysis Time Period Totat pM
lntersection FrontagefoV. West Lionshead
QirJurisdiction Town of Vait
Anafysis Year ?025
rrolecr uescflp(on uons Sguare Lodge: with imDrovement:
EasvwestStreet: So@ North/Souh Slreet: W. kyest Lionshead CircteIntersection Orientalion: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25
V€hicle Viilumes€nd
Major Strelt
Movernenl 1 I a 4 5
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h)0 765 135 54 8A 0Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95HourlyFlow Rate (veh/h)0 805 142 56 877 oProportion of heavy
vehicles, Pru 0 11
Median type TwoWav LefrTum Lane
RT Channelized?0 0LAnes0I0710ConfigurationTRLTUpstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound SouthboundMovement7I91011 12
L T R L T RVolUme (veh/h)121 0 12 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF o.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Houdy Flow Rate (veh/h)127 0 12 0 0 0Proportion of heavy
vehicles, PHv 12 0 12 0 o 0
Percent grade (%)0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage o 0
RT Channelized?0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0Configural'ron LR
avlAleui i ,f Setftce l
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement I 4 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LR
Volume, v (vph)56 135
Capacity, c, (vph)689 309
v/c ratio 0.08 0.45
Queue length (95o/o)u.ztt 2.22
Control Delay (s/veh)10.7 25.8
LOS B r)
Approach delay (siveh )zc.6
Approach LOS D
ucszaMrM Copyrigh O 2001 U.|iversiry ol'ftorita. Alt Righrs Rcscrvcd VersioD,J.ld
o
TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site lnformation
Analyst EAG
AgencylCo. Kimley-Horn
Date Performed A13/06
Analysis Time Period Total AM
lntersection F rontag e/ E. West Lion sha ad
Jurisdiction Town of Vail
Analysis Year 2007
Proiect Description Lion Square Lodge: no imprcveme\t
EasUWest Slreet: Soufi Frontage Road North/South Street: E West Lionshead Cicle
lntersection Orientation: Easl-Wesf Study Period (hrs): 0.25
iicle Volumes and Adi,ustmenB
Maior Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 'l z 3 4 5 o
L 'l-R L I R
Volume {veh/h)0 429 35 86 404 0
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)0 451 JO 90 425 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, Pru 0 16
Median tvoe Undivldec!
RT Channelized?0
Lanes 0 0 0 1 o
Configuralion IR LT
Upstream Signal a 0
Minor Street Northbound Soulhbound
Movement 7 8 I 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)37 0 155 0 0 0
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (vehi h 38 0 163 0 0
Proporlion of heavy
vehicles, Pru 22 0 zz 0 0 0
Percent grade (%)0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage n 0
RT Channelized?o
Lan es 0 0 0 0 0
configuration LR
Coitrol Dr ueue Lehqth. Level of Sditlce . , ,'t.,
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement I I I 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
Volume, v (vph)90 201
Capacity, c, (vph)1007 418
vic ratio 0.09 0.48
Oueue length (95o/o)0.29 2.54
Control Delay (s/veh)8.9 21.3
LOS
Approach delay (s/veh)21.3
Approach LOS
Hcs2ooorM CopyrSht (0 2001 Universiry ofFlorda, All Rights l{es€rved Version 4.i d
o o
TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
Analyst EAGAgency/Co. Kmley-Horn
Date Performed 2/13/06
Analysis Time Period Total pM
lntersection FlgntagelE. West Lionshead
CirJurisdiction Town of Vait
Analysis Year 2007
Proiecl Description L/bn Sqaare lodge: no improvements
EastMest Street: South Fronlegs Bo€td North/Soulh Streel: E West Lionshead Circte
Intersection Orientation; Easl-wesf Sludy Period (hrs): 0.25
itricle volumes and AOjustmi l]tl
Maior Street Eastbound Wesibound
Movement 1 2 3 5 o
I T R L T RVolume (vehi h)0 429 37 98 600 0
Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)U 451 38 103 421 0Proportion of heavy
vehicles, P"u 0 11
Median type Undivided
RT Channelized?0 0
Lanes 0 I 0 0 1 0
Configuration TR LT
Upqtrqam Signal 0 0
Minor Sheet Northbound SouthboundMovement7I91011 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)56 0 139 0 0 0Peak-hour factor. PHF o.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Houfly Flow Rate (veh/h)58 146 0 o 0Proportion of heavy
vehicles, PHV 47 0 17 0 0 0
Percent grade (%)0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized?a
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Contiguration LR
y, Queue Lengtb, Level bf Seav&
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 v 10 14 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
Volume, v (vph)103 204
Capacily, c, (vph)1029 3t3
v/c ratio 0.10 0.65
Queue length (95%)U.JJ 4.27
Control Delay (stueh)8.9 2X7
LOS A E
Approach delay (s/veh)35.7
Approach LOS E
Hcs2oooN ( opyright 6 2003 Unrvlrsiry offlorid., All Righrs Rcscrved Version 4.ld
I
HCS2000
rwd-wRy srop cl
Q.enGrallnfo
)NTROL SUMMA
F;iElri6r,iri6n
Analyst EAcAgency/Co. Kmley-Horn
Date Performed 2/1y06
Analysis Time Period Total AM
I
I lntersection FrontageE. West Lionshead
CirJurisdiction Town of Vai!
Analysis Year Z0OZ
I ian Snttara I aAaa. ^^ ;^^
Major Stregt ,,%
Eastbound WestboundMovemenl12345 6LTRLTRVolume (veh/h)0 429 35 86 404 0Peak-hgur factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 | 0.95 0.95Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h )0 451 36 90 425 0Proportion of heavy
vehicles, Pru 0 16 t-Median type Two Wav I aft Ttrn I ano
0
RT Channelized?
Lanes 0 I o I I 0ConfigurationTRLTUpstream Signal 0 0'Minor Street Northbound SoulhboundMovement76I1011 12LTRLTR
o
Volume (vehih)37 n 155 0 0PqaK-hourfactor, pHF 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)
0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Jd0163000Proportion of heavy
vehicles, P*u 22 0 22 0 0 0
Percent grade (yo)0 0Flared approach N NSlorage00RT Channelized?0 oLanes000000ConfigurationLR
:... L _ar,_rri;i..;:_. .:: ':.:lar.:. : :Approach EB w8 Northbound SouthboundMovemenl147891011 12Lane Configuration L LR
Volume, v (vph)90 201
Capacity, c, (vph)1007 490
v/c ratio 0.09 0.41
Queue length (95%)0.29 1.98
Control Delay (s/veh)8.9 17.4
LOS c
Approach delay (s/veh)17.4
Approach LOS c
Copyrighl O 2001 Uniwrsity ofFlorida, All Rights Rcs.rved Versron 4.ld
o
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
I
Analyst EAeAgency/Co. Kmley-Hom
Dale Performed ?113/06
Anafysis Tlme Period Total pM
Intersection FrontqaE. West Lbnshead
CirJurisdiction Town of Vai!
Analysis Year ZM7
EastMest Sireet: Soulfi
Intersection Orientation:
Major Str€et Eastbound
Movement 1 2 3 A
L T R T E
Volume (veh/h)0 429 37 on
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 o.95 noa I nor
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)451 38 103 871 n
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, P*0 II
Median type Two Wav I eft Trrn I ana
RT Channelized?
Lanes 0 l'tl1
Configuration
lpstream Signal
Minor Sfreet Northbound SouthboundMovement7891011 12
L I R L T Rlglq4e (veh/h)56 '0 139 0 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)58 0 146 0 0 0Proportion of heavy
vehides, PHV 17 0 17 0 0 0
Percgql grade (%)0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized?0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0ConfigurationLR
tilffiffijdF$uel
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 I v 10 11 12
Lane Configuration I LR
Volume, v (vph)103 204
Capacity, cm (vph)1029 428
v/c ratio 0.10 0.48
Queue length (95%)0.33 2.51
Control Delay (s/veh)8.9 20.8
LOS A c
Approach delay (s/veh)20.8
Approach LOS U
HCS2o@fM Copyright @ 2003 Univcrsity of Florida, Alt Righrs R6erved Version 4.ld
tt \t o
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General lnformation Site Information
Analysl EAG
Agenry/Co. Kmley-Hom
Date Performed 413/06
Analvsis Time Period Total AM
fntersection FrontagelE. West Lionshead
Cir
Jurisdiction Town of Vail
Analysis Year 2425
Pmiect Description Lion Square Lodge: no improvements
East/West Skeet: South Frontaee Road North/South Streei: E West Lbnshead Circle
lritersection Orientation: East-Wesl Studv Period (hrs): 0.25
Maior Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 3 4 5 o
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)0 654 64 112 590 0
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourlv Flow Rate (veh/h)0 688 67 117 621 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, P*0 16
Median type Undivided
RT Channelized?0 0
Lanes I 0 0 ,,0
Configuration TR LT
Upslream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 I I 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)57 0 175 0 0 0
Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 o.95 0.95 4.95
Hourly Flo\w Rate (veh/h)60 0 184 0 0 0
Proporlion of heavy
vehicles, Pru 22 0 22 0 0 0
Percent grade (7o)o 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized?0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 -f I 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT IR
Volume, v (vph)117 244
Capacily, c,o (vph)796 218
v/c ratio 0.15 1.12
Queue length (95%)0.51 11.33
Control Delay (s/veh)10.3 143.4
LOS B F
Approach delay (s/veh)143,4
Approach LOS F
Copyright O 2003 tlniversity ofFlorida. All Righ$ Reservedttcs2ooorM verion 4.ld
t
.:L
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General lnformation Site lnformation
Analyst EAcAgency/Co. Kimtey-Horn
Date Performed 2/13/06
Anafysis Time Period Total pM
lntersection F ro ntage/E. West Lion shead
CirJurisdiction Town of Vait
Analysis Year Z02S
Frojecr uescrfptlon Lion s-guafe Lodg6: no improvements
EasvwestSkeei: SouEl, Frontage Road North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle
Intersection Orientation: Easl-Wesf Sludy Period (hrs): 0.&
i/leior Street . Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L I R
Volume (veh/h)0 660 117 178 816 0Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)n 694 123 187 858 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, Pru U 11
!&taqUpe Undivided
RT Channelized?0 U
Lanes 0 t 0 0 1 0
Configuration IR LT
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 I 10 't1 12
L T.R L T R
Volume (veh/h)76 0 171 0 0 0Peak-hourfactor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
llolrly Flow Rate (veh/h )80 0 180 0 0 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, P"u 17 0 17 0 0 0
Percent grade (%)0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized?0 o
Lanes n 0 0 0 0
Configuratiqn tR
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 R I 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT tR
Volume, v (vph)187 260
Capacity, c, (vph)773 118
v/c rauo 0.24 2.20
Queue length (957o)0.95 22.15
ontrol Delay (s/veh)1 1.,1 628.1
LOS B
Approach delay (s/veh)628.1
Approach LOS F
Copyright @ 2003 []nrversily ofFloridE, AllRighrs ReservetlucslooorM Vclsion 4.ld
TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Inforqation Site lnformation
Anafyst EAeAgency/Co. Kmtey-Horn
Date Performed 2/13/06
Analysis Time Period Totat AM
Intersection F rontage/E. We st Lion sh ead
Cir
Jurisdiction Town of Vai!
Anafysis Year 2025
Project Description Lrbn Sguare Lodge.- wjlh i;mprovernenfs
EastMest Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E West Lionshead Circle
Intersection Orientation: Easf-Wesl Study Period (hrs): 0.?{
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 J 4 5 o
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)u 654 64 112 594 0
Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly FIow Rate (veh/h )0 688 67 117 621 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, P*0 16
llqqlqn type Tyo Way Left Tum Lane
RT Channelized?0
Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0
Configuration TR L T
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 I I 10 11 12
t T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)57 0 175 n 0 0
Peak-hour factor, PHF o.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Houdy Flow Rate (veh/h)60 0 1U 0 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, P*22 0 22 0 0 0
Percent grade (%)0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage
RT Ghannelized?0
U
onfiguration
;qntrot PeFY"r Queuelo
Approach EB WB Northbound Soulhbound
Movement .l 4 I o 10 11 12
Lane Configuralion l R
Volume, v (vph)117 60 184
Capacity, cm (vph)796 213 395
v/c ratio 0.15 0.28 0.47
Queue length (950/6)0.51 1.11 2.40
Control Delay (s/veh)10.3 28.4 21-8
LOS B
Approach delay (s/veh)23.4
Approach LOS
Version 4.lrlHcs:ooorM Copyright € 2003 UniVc|.sily ofFlorrdr All Righrs R€served
t_'aJ r C-o
TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General lnformation Site Information
Analyst EAc
Agency/Co. Kmley-Hom
Date Performed 41Y06
Analysis Time Period Total PM
lntersection
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
F ro ntag e/E. West Lio n sh e ad
Ch
Town of Vail
2025
Project Description Lion Square Lodge: with improvements
EasVWest Street: Souffi Frontage Road North/South Slreet: E West Lionshead Circle
Inlersection Orientation: EasFWesl Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Major Strsot Easlbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 o
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h)0 660 117 178 816 0
Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0-95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)0 694 123 187 858 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, Pru 0 11
Median type Two Way Left Tum Lane
RT Channelized?0 0
Lanes o 0 1 1 o
Configuration IR L T
Upstream Sisnal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 I 10 11 12
L T R L .T R
Volume (veh/h)76 o 171 0 0 0
Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)80 0 180 0 U 0
Proportion of heavy
vehicles, PHV 17 0 17 0 0 0
Percent grade (%)0 0
Flared approach N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized?0 0
Lanes I 0 0 0 0
Cgnfiguralion L R
iohtrol Delay, Queue l-ength;:Level d
Approach EB WB Northbound Soulhbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L R
Volume, v (vph)187 80 180
Capacity, c, (vph)773 244 385
v/c ralio 0.24 0.33 0.47
Queue length (95%)no<1-37 2.41
Control Delay (s/veh)11.1 zo.tt 22.3
LOS B D
Approach delay (s/veh)23.7
Approach LOS (-
ncs:QoorM Copyright G Z00l Univc$rty ofFlorida, All Righrs R(s(r(cd veNion 4.Id
l"
.t l ELlc K ASSOCIATES INO
tION SQUAN.E TODGE - NOR.TH
PROJECT COMPLIANCE - Lircnsheod RedwCopment lrtosicr Plon
3/13/06 Submittol io Communify Development for the PEC ond DRB opprovol proae$l
CIIAFIER 5 - IION SAUARE LODGE
Troffic Concerns -
The vehiculor circulolion wos primorily deolt with by Voil Resorts during lhe opprovol process {or
the Arobelle proiecl. Silre occess vio Lionsheod Ploce wos reoligned lo qccommodote bofh
surfoce ond sub l,errqin occess to the Arobelle prpiq:t for borh lodging vehicles ond delivery
vehicles. A new curb cul wos odded olong rhe {eur}of lionsheod Ploce lo sewe os the new
fronf door to the Lion Squore Lodge providing goJe-ed ond porking occess for the focility. A curb
cuf hos been odded olong the raCltr ppperty line of lhe Norfh proiect to provide occess lo lhe
new lower level of porking. The exislin!' curb cui olong lhe wesf property line of lhe North
project hos been moinloined ond shifted lo fhe properly line lo the norlh lo provide occess lo
ihe surfoce porking. Service vehicles will use this entry poinl, fo the north of the building. lo
service lhe building.
A troffic impoct sludy hos been provided by Kimerly Horn lo sfudy lhe troffic impocls of odding
nine new condominium units fo fhe North proiecf. They olso provided the lroffic impoct study
for the Arobelle so lhey ore fomilior with lhe surroundings. Their report sloles fhot no
infrosiruclure upgrodes ore required due to fhe qddition of the new unils.
Pedestrion Connection belween the Moin Building ond the North Building -
Pedesirion occess between the Moin Building ond lhe North Building wos primorily deolt with by
Voil Resorts during lhe opprovol process for the Arobelle proiecl. A cross wolk hos been
provided ocross Lionsheod Ploce belween lhe two properties fhot lies into the sidewolk olong
lhe north side of the reoligned Lionsheod Ploce. The primory pedesfrion enfronce fo fhe North
proiect is fhe eosl lobby enfronce in lhe eosl tower olong the eost side of the property. This
provides o cleor pedestrion conneclion ond defined vehiculor corridor between the Moin
Building ond the Norfh proiect.
Ski Yord Pedestrion Access -
Ski Yord Pedesfrion Accss wos primorily deolt wiih by Voil Resorfs during ihe opprovol proc€ss
for fhe Arobelle proiecl. Access lo lhe ski yord is obloined from norlh ond soulh of the Eost
Building. The North building projecl does not impocl ski prd pedestrion occess.
Polenfiol Developmenf ond Redevelooment Scenorios -
The North prolea is underloking moior exterior renovolions with the oddition of two new
condominium lowers lo the eosf ond wesl of fhe otisling building. This odditionol densily hos
been designed within the ollowoble requiremenls of lhe Lionsheod Mixed Use I (tMU-l)
District.
\'t
25I07 GENESEE IRAII. ID
A R,C H IT E CI U T,E SUIIE ONE HUNDRED ONE
I N T E I I O R S GOLDEN CO 8O,'OI
P LA N N I N G TEI 303.534.1930
www.MEucK.cor FAx 303-534. | 931
j
t o
CHAFTER 6 - S]IE DESIGN GUIDETINES
Primorv Pedesfrion Moll - nol opplicoble
Secondory Pedesfrion Moll - nol opplicoble
Primorv Pedeslrion Wolk -
Voil Resorls is providing lhe snowmelted sidewolk olong the norlh edge of Lionshesd Ploce os
porf of ihe Arobelle proiect. The North proiecf will be providing o londscope buffer befween the
sidewolk ond the unils io the norfh. This londscoping will be ochieved with o mix of deciduous
ond evergreen lrees lo protecl views ond sun exposure. Ornomeniols, perenniols ond onnuol
flowers will be provided for o wide voriely of lexlures ond seosonol color. The londscope
moieriols will nof inferfere with fhe pedesfrion wolk or snow sloroge requiremenls ot mofure
growlh.
Secondory Pedestrion Wolk - nol opplicoble
Vehiculor Podeslrion Retoil Slreet - not opplicoble
Pedestrion Poth -
The Norfh proiect is odding o pedesirion pofh for occess to fhe first floor unils thof will not be
snowmehed. The moteriols will be iniegrolly colored stomped concrole consislenl wilh lhe
surfoce finishes being used ol lhe Moin Building pool deck. The width of this secondory
pedostrion wolk will be five feel. Lighting long fhis polh is provided with low polhwoy bollords
consistenl wilh lhe orchileclurol design guidelines. A lown will be provided lo lhe south of lhe
poth os o lronsition lo fhe bermed londscoping to the soulh olong Lionsheod Ploce. This zone
will be defined by o low slone woll.
Fences ond Enclosures -
Service funcfions for lhe Norfh proiect ore being ochieved wifhin the building foofprinf ond
lherefore will nof require supplemenlol funcing, The ouldoor hol tubs will be screened ond
privotized wifh the use of ferroced sfone wolls softened with londscoping lo the soulh of lhe
wesf fower. A new lronsformer will be locoted lo lhe wesl of lhe wesl lower ond will be
screened ond soflened wifh lhe use of londscoping.
Complionce wilh Town of Voil Slreekcope Mosler Plon -
C}IAPTER,7 - DESIGN STANDANDS
LondscoEe Arco -
A minimum of 20% of the site will be londscoped os required. (see colculolions otlochedl
Sife Coverooe -
A mqximum oI TOVo ol the sife will be covered by sfructures os required. (see colculolions
ottoched)
Setbocks -
A minimum of o ten fool sefbock will be provided os required. There is o prescripiive eosement
olong lhe north property line lo fhe eosl end ihot ollows for o one slory slruclure lo be locoled
olong lhe property line os currenlly exists opposile lhe pool deckof Monloneros. (see
colculofions oifoched)
Gross Residentiol Floor Areo lGR,FAl -
The GRFA will nol exceed 250 sf of GRFA for eoch 100 sf of buildoble sife oreo. (see
colculolions ond drowings depiaing limif otoched!
t
Densilv -
The density will nof exceed 133% of the exisling number of units. (see colculotions oftoched)
Nerrr Unif Definifion - not opplicoble
Buildinq Heioht - olso see Chopter 8
The building heighl will not exceed 7l feet (oreroge) ond 82.5 feel (moximum).
CFIAPTER 8 - ARCHIECruRAI GUIDETINES
Arch iteclure -
The form ond mossing of the building provides for o comforlroble pedestrion scole ond olso
breoks down fhe scole of the building utilizing o bose, middle ond top.
Buildino Heioht -
The building height fits wilhin the moximum ollowoble of 7l fuet (cverogel ond 82.5 fuet
(moximuml. The rnoximum initiol eove heighf folls within the ollowoble fior'remoining building
fronloge'. Tha verficol woll foce dimensions ors broken whh horizontol sfeps, chonges in
moledol ond color lo breok down lhe mossing of the building in order lo provide for o higher
quolity ond more inleresling orticulolion.
Exterior Wolls -
The exlerior wolls ore designed with o bose, middle ond iop. The rhythm ond order of lhe
renoroled o<ferior on fhe exisling building ore dictoted by the o<isting condifions. An effort hos
been mode fo breok lhe roof lines ond decks. Goble roof forms hove been odded ot the dack
elemenfs to breok lhe continuous horizonlol liie on the building ond to provide on A, B rhythm.
fhis is olso enhonced with the use of poinled mefol roilings ond bolusiers ol lhe bolconies. A
monsord roof elemenl hos olso been odded olong the perimeler of the building, be{rveen the
goble roof forms over fhe decks, to soffen ond provide detoil fo the new elevotions. The eosl
ond wesl ends of the existing building 016 olso defined wifh o higher roof forms ond differenl
yet compotible orliculolion. This orticulotion ond vocobulory of moleriols ond lreolmenl qre
whot define fhe eosl ond west towers lo provide for o uniform treotment of the building
exlerior.
Moteriols ond Colors -
The bose is defined either wifh o differenl dorker slucco color or sfone, os well os o breok in
plone. The middle is defined by o lighfer color of sfucco. The top is defined by o chonge in
moteriol ond lexfure wifh verlicol siding ihe some color os the 'middle' slucco olong with fhe
roof ond chimney form. All trims, eoves, rokes, lrims. doors, ond limber elemenk ore while.
Wndow clodding is bronze. Tlre colors were chosen to blend with lhe surrounding slruclur*
while providing o visuol ond psychologicol worrnth to pedestrions.
Window Sizes, Shopes ond Tvpes -
All windows hove o consislency of size ond proporlion lhroughouf the elerrolions, Operoble
windows will be cosement. The windows will be oluminum clod, bronze. All windows will be
frimmed, the color white.
Bolconies, Guqrdroils qnd Hondroils -
The bolconies hove been locofed to provide functionol ouldoor spoce ond olso to provide
oeslheiic benefit ond daoil to ihe building exterior. Where bolconies ore not procticol, lhey
hove been odded to the building o<lerior os o 'romeo ond iuliel' bolcony fo provide visuol detoil
ond inleresl io the building exlerior. The moferiols lo be used for the hondroil, pickets ond
posh will be poinfed metol. The design of fhe roiling syslem is potlerned ofier fhe onder of the
building exferior elevolions.
',
Roofs -
Tte roof forms being used include monsord roofs ol lhe exisfing flot rooft, goble roofr over
existing bolconies, ond hipped roofs wilh gobled roofs copping lhe new slruclures. The
monsord roof form on the exisling building is o procticol meons of tying the exisfing sfrucfure
inio fhe new design elemenls of the renovoled exterior ond new lowers. The slructurol copocity
of the existing building will not iolerote the oddition of o full pitched roof. Adding o full pikhed
roof lo ihe exisling building would olso greolly diminish lhe vierr corridor being moinloined
behreen the two new lowers for the properties lo lhe norlh. The predominonl goble roof forms
being used loke fheir cue from the simple, frogmenled, goble roof forms of Europeon villoges.
Roof overhongs will be consfrucled with fhe minimum 30 inch eove ond roke overhongs olong
with the minimum of l8 inches ot secondory roof forms. Ridge beoms ond oulriggerc will be
visuolly slurdy membens of 6x or 8x minimums. Rofter loils ore not porl of the exlerior building
vocobulory ol fhis time, The roof pirch will be o 12:12 occept os noled olherwise on the
drowings. Snow fences ore being provided in locotions to prolect pedesfrions below from
folling snow ond will be poinfed metol. Gutters ond downspouts ore plonned fo be integrol lo
lhe roof forms with interior downspouts.
Fireploces ond Chimnevs -
Sfucco chimneys with open metol cops lo promole oir flow ond screen spork orreslors ore being
provided for fireploce chimnep.
Porkino -
Porking Structure Designl. Surfoce Porking - 22 surfoce porking spoces 1116 provided with occess from lhe romp
olong lhe north properly line.2. Porking Decla - 34 porking spoces ore provided in lhe lower porking level with occess
from the romp from fhe south opposif,a the Anflers curb cul. The decks ore primorily flot
orcepl for whol is required fo properly droin tha decks,
3. Sfructured Porking
o. Porking Spoces - The enclosed porking spoces ore 90 degrees to the drive oisle
ond 9' x 19', with 8' x l6' compocl porking spoces not exceeding 25% of the
totol of the lotol required porking spoces,b. Height Cleoronce - The heighl cleoronce of the porking structure will be o
minimum of 7' cleor,c. Drive Aisles - The drive oisles ore fwo woy ond 24' wide.
d. Romps - The romps belween levels ore 24'wide with l2% slope.
1. Porking Needs Assessmenl ond Vehiculor Circulolion Porkingo. Porking Counl
Moinioin Existing 31
New for New Condos l3 (l .4 spoces for eoch unit)
Extro Sooces 9 (jncluding h.ondicool
Totol Porking Count 56
5. Circulotiono. Existing curb cul ond romp locolion lo remoin bosicolly the some.
b. New romp inlo lhe new lower level porking slruclure is locoled opposite the' curb cul lo lhe Antlers.c. 24' wide two-woy drive oisles occommodole 90 degree porking stolls.
Grodino -l. Moximum Finished Grode - The moximum finished grode does nol exceed o 2:l slope.
The nolurol slope of the sile is relolively flot. New groding lo occommodole droinoge
will be blended into the nolurol lopogrophy.2. Conslruction Fence - The conslrucfion site will be properly surrounded by o non-
removoble conslruclion fence during lhe consiruclion proc€ss.
Dt
3. Erosion Confrol - Erosion conlrol meosures will be ufilized using fhe besf monogemenl
proctic€s. The eroaion confrol plon will be prepored by o registered Colorodo
Professionol Engineer.
Retoining Wolls -
I . Ttr. r"t"ining wolls will be designed ond stomped by o licensed P.E. Terroce londscope
wolls will be within fhe .4' - 6' moximum height mnge. Due to lhe relotively flot noture
of fhe site retoining wolls will'not exisl on slopeo orceeding 30%. These wolls will be
veneered with sfone.
Geologic/Environmentol Hozords -
f . ftne tfe aoes not contoin snow ovqlonche, debris flow, rock foll, unstoble soils or slopss
or wetlonds.
llE L tc K A S S O C I A t: S ,No
tION SQUARE TODGE - NORTH
PROJECT COMPLIANCE - Lionsheod RedeveloPmeni Moster Plon
6/2/06 Submittol lo Communify Developmenf for the PEC ond DRB opprovol process
CHAFTER 5. LION SAUARE TODGE
Troffic Concerns -
The vehiculor circulofion wos primorily deoll wilh by Voil Resorts during the opprovol process for
fhe Arrobelle proiecl, She occess vio lionsheod Ploce wos reoligned lo occommodote bofh
surfoce ond sub lerroin occess to the Arrobelle proiecl for both lodging vehicles ond delivery
vehicles. A new curb cul wos odded olong lhe south of Lionsheod Ploce to serve tls lhe new
front door to the Lion Squore Lodge providing goted ond porking occoss for lho focility. A curb
cul hos been odded olong fhe soulh property line of the North prolect to provide occess lo ihe
new lower level of porking. The existing curb cui olong lhe wesl property line of the North
proiecf hos been moinfoined ond shifted opproximotely five feet to the north lo provide occess
io ihe surfoce porking. Service vons will use lhis eniry poinl, under the west building, to service
the building.
A troffic impoct study hqs been provided by Kimerly Horn lo study the troffic impocts of odding
nine new condominium units to the North proiect. They olso provided the froffic impoct study
for lhe Arrobelle so they ore fomilior with fhe surroundings. Their reporl sloles fhol no
infroslructure upgrodes ore required os long os no more thon l3 unils ore odded to the proiecl'
Pedesirion Conneclion between the Moin Buildino ond fhe Norfh Buildino -
Pedesrrion occess befween the l'{oin Building ond lhe Norlh Building wos primorily deolf wifh by
Voil Resorts during the opprovol process for lhe Arrobelle proiect. A cross wolk hos been
provided ocross Lionsheod Ploce belween the two properti€s thol lies inlo fhe sidewolk olong
the north side of fhe reoligned Lionsheod Ploca. The primory pedesfrion enlronc€ to fhe Norlh
proiect is the eosf lobby onlronce in lhe eosl lower olong the eosl side of the property. This
provides o cleor pedeslrion conneclion ond defined vehiculor corridor between lhe Moin
Building ond lhe North proiect.
Ski Yord Pedeslrion Access -
Ski Yord Pedeslrion Access wos primorily deolt with by Voil Resorts during the opprovol process
for lhe Arrobelle prolect. Access lo the ski yord is obtoined from norlh ond soulh of the Eost
Building. The Norfh building proiecl does nol impocl ski yord pedeslrion occess.
Potentiol Developmenf ond Redeveloomenl Scenorios -
The North proiecl is underloking moior exterior renovolions with the oddition of lwo new
condominium towers to lhe eosl ond wesl of the existing building. This oddhionol densily hos
been designed within fhe ollowoble requiremenk of the [ionsheod Mixed Use I (uvtU-l)
Distria.
25I07 GENESEE TRAII RO
ARCHITECIURE SUITE OI.IE HUNDNED ONE
I N r E t l o l5 GoLoEN co 80.o I
PLAN NrN G TEt 303.53,r.r930
www.MELtcK.coM FAx 303.534. | 98 1
o
CHAfTER 6 - SITE DESIGN GUIDEUNES
Primorv Pedestrion l'{oll - not opplicoble
Secondorv Pedeslrion lv{oll - nof opplicoble
Primorv Pedeskion Wolk -
Voil Resorfs is providing fhe snowmelied sidewolk olong lhe north edge of Lionsheod Ploce os
port of the Arrobelle proiect. The North proiecf will be providing o londscope buffer belween
the sidewolk ond fhe unifs to fhe norlh. This londscoping will be ochieved wifh o mix of
deciduous ond evergreen trees to protecf views ond gun expoSure. Omomenlols, perenniols
ond onnuol flowers will be provided fior o wide voriely of terdures ond seosonol color. The
londscope moleriols will not interfere with lhe pedesfrion wolk or snow slorogc requiremenls ol
moture growth.
Secondory Pedestrion Wolk - noi opplicoble
Vehiculor Pedeslrion Reloil Sfreet - nof opplicoblc
Pedeslrion Polh -
The Norlh proiecl is odding o pedeslrion pofh for oceess io the first floor unils fhat will not be
snowmehed. The moleriols will be integrolly colored stomped concrele consistent wilh the
surfoce finishes being used ol the Moin Building pool deck. Tlre widfh of this secondory
pedestrion wolkwill Lc five feef. Lighting long fhis polh is provided wilh low pothwoy bollords
ionsisfent with lhe orchileclurol design guidelines. A lovrn will be provided lo fhe soulh of the
poth os o tronsition to fhe bermed londscoping lo the soufh olong Lionsheod Ploce. This zone
will be defined by o low slone woll.
Fences ond Enclosures -
Service functions fror the North proiecl ore being ochieved wifhin fh€ building footprinl ond
fherefore will nol require supplemcnfol fencing. Tfie ouldoor hot lubs will bs screcned ond
privolized wifh fhe use of lerroced slone wolls soffened with londscoping to the soufh of lhe
wesf lowar. A nerv lronsformer will be locoted to lhe wesf of the weol lower ond will be
ecreened ond soflened with the use of londscoping.
Complionce with Town of Voil Slreetscooe Mosler Plon -
CHAMR 7 - DESIGN STAhIDATDS
Londscooe Areo -
A minimum of 20% of the sife will be londscoped os required. (see colculotions otfoched)
Sile Coveroge -
A moximum of 7096 of the site will be covered by drucfures os required. (see colculolions
ottoched)
Setbocks -
A minimum of o ten f,oot selbock will be provided os reqpired. The o<isling one sfory sfruclure
in the Prescriptive Eosemenl olong lhe noilh property line will be left in ploce ond reclod wifh
stucco to be in keeping with the new design.
Gross Residenfiol Floor Areo (GRFA) -
The GRFA will nol exceed 250 sf of GRFA for eoch I O0 sf of buildoblc sile oreo. (sec
colculotions ond drowings depicling limits ofiroched)
Densilv -
o
The density will nol elaeed 133% of lhe odsting number of unils. (see colculotions otloched)
New Unit Definifion - not opplicoble
Buildino Heighl- olso see Chopter 8
The building height will nol exceed 7l feel (cveroge) ond 82.5 feet (moximum).
CTIAPTER. 8 - ARCHTTBCruRAT GUIDEUNES
Architedure -
The form ond mossing of the building providee fior o comforf,oble pedestrion scole ond olso
breoks down fhe scsle of the building ulilizing o bosg, middle ond top.
Buildino Heioht-
The building heighf fits within the moximum ollowoble of 7t fuei {overoge) ond 82.5 feet
(moximum). Ihe moximum initiol eove height folls within lhe ollowoble for'remoining building
ironloge'. 'The verticol wolt foce dimensions ore broken with horizonfol sleps, chonges in
_
mourill ond color lo breok down lhe mossing of rhe building in order lo provide for o higher
quolity ond more inleresting orticulolion.
Extrarior Wolls -
Thi exterior wslls ore designed wilh o bose, middle ond lop. The rhylhm ond order of lha
renovoled oderior on fhe existing building ore dictolod by lhe existing condifions. An effrort hos
been mode to breok the roof lines ond decks. Goble roof frorms hove been odded ot the deck
elements to breok fhe conlinuous horizoniql line on lhe building ond lo provide on A" B rhythm.
This is olso enhonced with lhe use of pointed melol roilings ond bolusiers ot fhe bolconies. A
monsord roof elemenl hos olso been odded olong lhe perimeler of fhe building, befireen the
goble roof forms over lhe decks, to soften ond provide detoil fo lhe new elevofions. The eosl
ond west ends of the otisfing building ore olso defined with o higher roof forms qnd different
pl compofible orliculolion. This orticulotion ond vocobulory of moleriols ond lreolmenf ore
whot define lhe eosl ond wesf towers to provide for o unifrorm treqtmenl of the building
exlerior.
Moteriols ond Colorc -
The bose is defined either with o diffurenf dorker stucco color or stone, os well os o breok in
plone. The middle is defined by o lighter color of stucco. The fop is defined by o chonge in
moteriol ond texture with verlicol siding tha some color os lhe 'middlc' slucco olong wiih the
roof ond chimney form. All trims, eoves, rokes, trims, doors, ond limber elemenls ore whilc.
Window clodding is bronze. The colorc were chosen to blend with lhc surrounding sfruclures
while providing o visuol ond psphologicol wormlh lo pedeslrions.
Window Sizes, Shooes ond Tvpes -
All windows hove o consistency of size ond proporlion throughoul lhe elevolions. Operoble
windows will be cosement. The windows will be oluminum clod, bronze. All windows will be
frimmed, fhe color white.
Bolconiec. Guordroils ond Hondniils -
The bolconies hove been locoted to provide funclionol oufdoor spoce ond olso f,o provide
oesthelic benefit qnd detoil to the building otterior. Where bolconies ore nof proclicol, they
hove been odded to the building exf,erior os o 'romoo ond juliet' bolcony lo provide visuol detoil
ond inierest fo the building exlerior. The mof,eriols to be used for fhe hondroil, pickels ond
posts will be pointed metal. The design of fhe roiling system is potlemed ofter lhe order of fhe
building eld,erior elevofions.
Roofs -
The roof {orms being used include monsond rooft otthe exisling flol roofs, goble roofr over
exisiing bolconies, ond hipped rooh wilh gobled rooft copping the new sfruclures. The
monsord roof form on lhe exisling building is o procticol meons of tying fhe exisfing slruclure
into fhe new design elements of lhe renowfed exlcrior ond new lowers. The slrucfurol copocily
of the existing buiHing will nol iolerote the oddilion of o full pitched roof. Adding o full pikhed
roof lo fhe exisling building would olrc greolly diminish the view corridor being moinloined
befween fhe fwo new towerc for lhe properlies lo the north. The predominont goble roof forms
being used foke lheir cue from lhe simple, frogmenled, goble roof forms of Europeon villoges.
Roof overhongs will be conslrucfed wilh the minimum 30 inch eove ond roke overhongs olong
wiih fhe minimum of l8 inches ot secondory roof forms. Ridge beoms ond outriggerc will be
visuolly sturdy members of 6x or 8x minimums. Rqfter foils ore nol port of fhe exierior building
vocobulory of lhis time. The roof pifch will be o 12: t 2 occepf os noled otherwise on the
drowings. Snow fences ore being provided in locolions lo proiect pedestrions below from
folling snow ond will be pointed mefol, Gullers ond downspouts ore plonned fo be infegrol fo
lhe roof forms with inlerior downspoub.
Fireoloces ond Chimnens -
Sfu*" .hl-*yr *lth 6p"n meiol cops fo promolo oir flow ond screen spork orrostors ore being
provided for fireploce chimneys.
Porkinq -
Porking Sfruclure DesignL Surfoco Porking -22 swloce porking spoces ore provided with occess from lhe romp
olong lhe north property line.
2. Porking Decks - 34 porking spoces ore provided in lhe lower porking level wilh occess
from lhe romp from the soulh opposile the Antlers curb cul. The decks ore primorily fol
excepl for whal is required to properly droin fhe decks.
3, Slrucfured Porking
o, Porking Spoces - The enclosed porking spocos dre 90 degrees lo lhe drive oisle
ond 9'x 19', wifh 8'x l6'compocl porking spoces nol exceeding 25% of fhe
fofol of lhe tolol required porking spoces. Volet porking (13) spoccs ore I' x I 8'
ond do nol exceed 50% of lhe required porking.
b. Height Cleoronco - The heighl cleoronce of the porking struclure will be o
minimum of 7' cleor.
c. DrivE Aisles - The drive oisles ore lwo woy ond 24' wide,
d. Romps - The rompa befween levels ore 24'wide wifh l2% slope'
1, Porking Needs Assessmeni ond Vehiculor Circulotion Porking
o. Porking Count
Mointoin Existing
New fior New Condos
38
l3 (l ,4 spoces for eoch unit)
Refoil 2 (2.3 spoces Per 1000 s0
Totol Porking Count 53
5. Circulotion
o. Exisfing curb cut ond nimp locolion lo remoin bosicolly the some.
b. Nor romp into lhe new lower level porking slrucfure k locoled opposile the
curb cuf to lhe Antlers,
c. 24'wide lwo-woy drive oislee occommodole 90 degree porking stolls.
Groding -
l. Moximum Finished Grode - The moximum finished grode does nol exceed o 2:l slope.
The nolurol slope of the sile is relolively flof. New groding lo occommodote droinoge
will be blended inlo the nofurol topogrophy.
2. Conslruclion Fence - The conslruclion site will be properly surrounded by o non-
removoble construclion fence during lhe conslruclion process.
o
3. Erosion Control - Erosion conlrol meosures will be utilized using lhe beof monogemenl
proctices. The erosion conlrol plon will be prepored by o registered Colorodo
Professionol Engineer.
Refoinino Wolls -
l. The refoining wolls will be designed ond stomped by o licensed P.E. Terroce londscope
wolh will be within lhe 4'- 6' moximum heighl ronge. Due to lhe relofively flof noture
of the site reioining wolls will nol exisl on slopes exceeding 3O%. These wolls will be
veneered with stone.
Geolooic/Environmenlol Hozqrds -
l. The site does nol contoin snow ovolonche, debris flow, rock foll, unsloblc soils or slopes
or wellonds.
oo
ror .
E
t*
aroN ;:l'ff '.:?ifi,!";!o
*'" o
3/13/06
36
27I
36
Allowable Units
Existing Units
Proposed Units
Total Units
105,223 sf
24229st
49,620 sf
29,4ts2sf
16,649 sf
5,812
6,9S2
29,453
Alloryable
Existing
Proposed Nerv Building Footprint
Proposed Parking Structure Footprint (be1or grade)
8,417 sf
11.100 sf
34
't3
47
Existing
New Required
I
43
4
56
25%,8x16
757o, 9x19
Compacts
Full
HC
Total Provided
12'min. steo back
Prepored by: Melick Associotes
td
Jo* i:"''ll'.:?ifi,il^!o*" O
3/13/06tl
e; mary feconO ary B u i ld i n g M aterial Def Primary: exceed 500 sf area
Secondary: 5fi) sf area or less
conforms with intent
conforms with intent
Primary Secondary Building Colorc Primary: exceed 500 sf area
Secondary: 5(D sf area or less
conforms with intent
conforms with intent
Frimary Secondary Roof Deflnitions Primary: exceed 500 sf roof area
Secondary: 500 sf roof area or less
conforms with intent
conforms with intent
FootoimensionalGuidelines 30'min. eave and rake overhangs
18" overhangs at secondary roofs
conforms
conforms
Roof Pitch Primary: 6:121o 12'12
Secondary: 4:121o'12:12 (or flat)
12:12
conforms
conforms
Prepored by: Melick Associotes
tr^:lf cK Asso crltr, , r..f
tune2,2006
Bill Gibson, AICP
Town Plonner
Town of Voil
Voil, Colorodo 81657
RE: Lion Squore Lodge - North
Deor Bill,
I om submifting this letler olong with the PEC ond DRB pockoge doted 6/2/06
for the purposes of responding to your 5/24/06letler on o ifem by item bosis.
ll is our opinion thot we hove provided the requesfed informotion or mode ihe
oppropriofe chonge to our documents, Our response is os follows:
Firp Demrlment
I hove reviewed this projecl o number of times wirh Mike McGee ond he hos
ogreed on the locolion of the stoging, onnunciolor ponel, siomese connecfion
ond sprinkler volve room. These locotions ore shown on the drowings ond hove
been reviewed with you. Once the proiect hos received lown opprovolwe will
hire Shoner tifia Sofety lo work out the remoining design issues. Prior lo
beginning work on this port of fhe proiecl we will hove onother meeling with
Mike ond Debbie Shqner to review Mike's expectolions moving forword ond to
develop o plon for design review.
Pu blic Works Dcporlment
Per Tom Kossmel's outhorizolion, we ore proceeding wiih the design of the
"performonc€ ohemolive" to the porking slrucfure sight distonce issues ot the
soufh romp. Peok Lond Consuhonts hos enlisted the ossislonce of PBS&J, troffic
consuhonts, fo design the signoling s)6lem for the soulh romp. Pleose see lhe
ottoched norrotive describing fte solvobility of Public Work's concem with the
south romp ond some design solulion systems. We plon on setting up o
meeting with Tom Kossmel nexl week fo review PBS&J's design options ond
opprooch to finding on oppropriote solution. We plon on hoving this system
odequotely designed ond described to sotisfy Tom Kossmel for his opprovol by
lhe June 26th PEC meeting,
355 SOUTH TEUER STREET
Atc HI TECTURE grlEltlEfthHosa/Efif
tNTERtORS IATEWOOD CO 80226
PLANNTNG r€l 303.53a. | 930
www.r cltcK.coM FAx 3 0 3. 53 a. I 9 3 1
'i' Generol Commenls
l. South romp sight distonce - discussed obove under Public Works
Deporlmenf.
2. 8% cross slooe - Peok Lond Consultonts hos come up wifh o soluiion thot
in concept is occeploble lo Tom Kossmel. PLC hos reworked the roodwoy
grodes ond the curb cul to Antlers in their civil drowings.
3. Concrele pons oi enlronces - Peok lond Consuhonts hos come up with o
solution thot in concepf is occeptoble io Tom Kossmel which is included
in the civil drcwings.
4. Sight distonce on londscope plon - The sight dislonce is shown on the
londscope plon os requesled.
5. Lighting Plon - We do nol hove the Arrobelle lighting plon. lt hos been
difficult getting CAD files for the Arrobelle proiect. ls lhere ony olher
woy to meel your requiremenf short of showing their lighfing on our
drowings? We hove provided our lighting loyouls, luminence
colculotions ond cut sheels os previously requesled.
6. Volet spoces - The porking loyout hos been modified. The volet spoces
shown on our drowings ore cleorly morked.
7. Volet spoces - The porking loyout does nof block ony dumpslers or
mechonicol rooms.
8. Prescriplive eosemenl - A copy of the prescriplive eosement hos been
previously provided for your review. However, it is no longer our inleni
io rebuild the axisting one slory structure but to leove il in ploce ond fo
simply re-clqd the strucfure in sfucco lo be more in keeping with ihe
surrounding plonned exlerior finishes.
9. Holv Cross eosemenl - This proposed eosement for the tronsformer is
shown on dur plons.
lO.Troffic Report - The troffic report dolad 2/2'l /O6 will be updoted to show
the octuol number of proposed units being odded to the proiecl prior lo
finolopprovol.
Generul Commenlg fior Aoorovol
l . Town of Voil Generol Notes - Once the Town of Voil Generol Notes
ore provided we will include lhem on our documents.
2. Ufility Signoture Block - lt is my underslonding thof oll utility
componies hove signed off on the prolecl os requesfed.
. 3. Consfruction stoging issues - These will be resolved prior lo
conslruclion.
1. Public Wov permit - This will be obtoined ond opproved prior to the
storf of construction.
5. TOV Revocoble ROW permit - This will be recorded for oll privote
property improvements locoted within public woys.
6. Permonent ond lqmporory eosements - Prior lo the opprovol of o
building permil, these will be recorded with Eogle County.
7. Shoring ond excovotion plon - Prior to the opprovol of o building
permil, this plon will be submified lo show excorrolion phosing,
engineered shoring, profile ond cross seclions, ond existing utilities.
8. Excovotion shoring methods - lt is the plon of the developer lo shore
lhe excovotions wilhout encrooching on odiocenl properties to include
rhe ROW.
9, Stormwoter ond dewolerino - A CDPHE permit, slormwoler
monqgement plon, ond oll opplicoble ACOE permits will be submitted
prior lo conslruclion.
10. Civil construction drowings - The finol civil construction drowings will
meet Town of Voil stondords ond will be issued prior to fte building
permit being opproved.
I l. North setbqck - All encroochmenls within fhe norlh property line
setbock hcve been removed.
12. Porking colculotions - All porking colculotions, to include retoil, ore
included in lhe revised colculolions.
13. Employee Housing - The developer hos confocted Nino Timm
regording the employee housing requiremenls. This requirement will
be mel off-site.
14. Exterior liohlino - The requested fixfure specificotions ond luminqnce
colculotions hove been previously provided os requesled.
15. Roof heighi plon - The roof height plon hos been revised to include
interpolofed grodes with revised roof height colculotions.
16. Mechonicol screeninq - The plons ond descriptions hove been
provided os requested.
17, Color ond somple boord - The exferior color ond somple boord olong
with exterior renderings hove been presented to DRB ond PEC. These
ore being revised for the 6/26/06 PEC heoring.
18. 3D model - A 3D model hos been presenled fo PEC ond is being
modified per their commenls to better show the building in contod lo
the height of the surrounding buildings.
Plonnino Deportmenl
I . Prescriolive eosemenf - As sfofed obove, it is no longer our inienl lo
rebuild the existing one slory slrucfure but to leqve it in ploce qnd to
simply reclod lhe slruclure with slucco lo be more in keeping with the
surrounding plonned exlerior finishes. This should negofe your
requiremenl fo provide o writlen documenf lhot demonstrofes our
outhority to occess, demolish, ond reconsirucl improvemenls.
2. Site oreo - The site oreo of 12,089 wos colculoled bosed on digitizing the
meels ond bounds of the property. However per your requesf, Peok Lond
Consultonts is confirming this number os compored to the 41,513 thot
occurs in lhe Town's historicol records.
3. North l0' Setbock - The porking slrucfure hos been removed from the
len foot setbock.
A-' 4. Sile coverooe colculolions - These colculolions hove been revised to
include the underground porking
5. Porkinq colculotions - The porking loyoul hos been revised ond therefore
the colculotions lo reflec this chonge. The colculotions for required ond
provided porking spoces ore os follows:
38 Existing Units
13 New Units
2 Retoil
53 Totol
6. Employee Housing - The developar is coordinoting this with Nino Timm.
7. Roof heiqht plon - The roof height plon hos been revised io show both
nolurol ond proposed grodes.
Pteose conlocl me if our underctonding on ony of fte items listed obove is nol
lhe some os yours or if we ore not toking oppropriote oction. Pleose confocl me
with ony queslions or comments.
Sincerely,
Chip Melick
MELICK ASSOCIATES
cc:
Dovid Viele - Viele Construction
Shelly Mdo - Viele Consfruction
Bill Anderson - Lion Squore Lodge
Honk Krouse - Peok Wesl Associoles
Mork Luno - Peok Lond Consultonis
JonNson & RBpuccr LLP
ATTORNEYS ANp CoUNSELORS AT LAw
252 I BRoADWAY, SUITE A
Bour"DB, CoroRADo 80304
TEL-EPHoNE 303442-l 900
TEI-EFAX 303-442-0 I 9l
wwwj-rlaw.com
BOULDER
WINTER PARK
VAIL
Alexander d Preiser
April2l,2006
VIA ELECTRONIC MAILAND
HAND DELIWRY
Bill Gibson
Planner II
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
I';e: A requestfor afnal review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section I2-
7H-7, Major Exterior Alterations or Modifi.cations, Yail Town Code, to allowfor the
renovation of the Lion Square Lodge North, located at 660 West Lionshead
Place/Lot 8, Block I, Vail Lionshead Filing 3, and settingforth details in regard
thereto. (PEC06-0019)
Dear Bill:
As you are aware, this firm represents Montaneros Condominium Association, hc. (the
"Association"), whose individual members are all of the owners of the units located in
Montaneros Condominiums ('Montaneros'). Montaneros is located in Lionshead immediately
north of Lion Square North Condominiums ("Lion Square'). Consequent$, the Association has
a strong interest in the proposed redevelopment ofLion Square currently under consideration by
the Planning and Environmental Commission ("PEC").
For the reasons more particularly described in this letter, the Association is opposed to
the current proposal for redevelopment of Lion Square. Tbe Association acknowledges and
agrees with the stated policy objective of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan (the
"Master Plan") relating to renewal and redevelopment, providing that Lionshead can and should
be renewed and redeveloped to become a warrner, more vibrant environment for guests and
residents. (See Master Plan, Section 2.3. I .) However, tlte proposed Lion Square redevelopment
fails to satisf, and is actually contrary to, a fundamental design objective of the Master Plan: to
enhance and strengthen the physical and visual connections to the natural environment ofGore
Creek and Vail Mountain (See Master Plan, Section 1.2.) In addition, as cunently proposed, the
Lion Square redevelopment plan violates tle provisions of the Lionshead Mixed Use I zone
district ("LMU-I") and certain private agreements of the parties.
l. Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. The Town Council adopted a set of
urban desigrr principles to guide the development of tlte Master Plan, which include "connect
{00038696 / 2}
o
Bill Gibson
April2l,2006
Page2
Lionshead physically and visually to the mountain landscape." (See Master Plan, Section 2.5.)
This guiding principle is reiterated throughout the Master Plan. For example, Section 3.10 of the
Master Plan identifies the lack of visual connection with the natural environment amons the
biggest concerns in Lionshead.
ln making its recommendations to address the various issues described in the Master
Plan, the Town Council recognized that "as development and redevelopment occur in Lionshead,
it will be vital to protect visual connections to the ski mountain." (See Master Plan, Section
4.3.1.) To that end the Master Plan directs that "all private development and redevelopment
should endeavor to create visual connections from and through their properties." (See Master
Plan,Section4.3-1.1.) TheMasterPlansuggestsanorth-southorientationofbuildingmassesto
meet this goal and to accomplish several objectives including sun access and views from existing
buildings. (See Master Plan, Secfion 4.3.1.2.)
A review of the Lion Square PEC/DRC submittal reveals that the foregoing objectives of
the Master Plan will not be achieved. In particular, the December sun shade analyses prepared
by Lion Square illustrates that while the existing Lion Square building casts little shadow on the
Montaneros, the proposed building will virhrally engulf the Montaneros building in shade.
Copies ofthese analyses are enclosed herewith for your convenience.
2. Zonins Regulations: LMU-I Zone District.
- (a) Pumose. Montaneros acknowledges and agrees with the stated goal of the
LMU-I zone district to cr€ate an economically vibrant lodging, housing and commercial core
area. However, this goal is to be achieved within the parameters provided by the zone district.
Specifically, the Zoning Regulations note that the LMU-I zone district'ls intended to ensure
adequate light, air, open space and other amenities." (^9ee Town Code, Section l2-7H-1).
(b) Setbacks. Section l2-7H-10 of the Town Code provides that the minimum
building setbacks shall be teq feet (10') unless otherwise specified in the Master Plan as a build-
to line. ln accordance with Section 5.8 of the Master Plan, build-to lines are located primarily in
the Lionshead retail core, and Map S, attached to the Master Plan, confirms that the setback for' the Lion Square properfy is ten feet (10').
The existing Lion Square building extends to the property line of tle
Montaneros and Lion Square properties, and the deck on ttre east end of the Lion Square building
encroaches into the Montaneros property with the benefit of a written easement deed given for
this purpose. (See Section 3(b) below.) However, the east tower of the proposed Lion Square
building actually crosses the property line, without the benefit of an easement therefor, and
violating the setback requirements of the Town Code. Nevertheless, there is no indication in the
materials acquired by the Association that Lion Square has requested a variance to allow the
setback encroachment, and, as described below, Lion Square cannot establish the necessary
criteria to obtain this variance.
{00038696 / 2}
Bill Gibson
Apnl2l,2006
Page 3
(c) Variance. In considering an application for a variance, Section 12-17-6.A.
of the Town Code directs the PEC to consider:
(i) The relationship ofthe requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
(iD The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation
and enforcement ofa specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of heafinent among sites in tle
vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of
special privilege.
(iii) The effect ofthe requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
(iv) Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable
to the proposed variance.
In addition, Section 12-17-6.8. directs the PEC to make the following findings before granting a
variance:
(i) That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of
special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other
properties classified in the sams district.
. (ii) That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfate, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(iiD That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following
reasons:
1) The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the
specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or
unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of this title.
2) There are exceptional or extraordinarycitcumstances or
conditions applicable to the site ofthe variance that do not
apply generally to other properties in the same zone.
3) The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the
specified regulation would deprive the applicant of
{00038695 i 2}
Io
Bill Gibson
April2l,2006
Page 4
privileges enjoyed by the owners ofother properties in the
same district.
Liqn Square cannot satisfy the above criteriajustifying the granting ofa
variance to allow its proppsed building to be constructed within the setback area. In particular,
the location of the propoqed east tower of the building would have a detrimental effect on the
Montaneros, due in part {o the negative effect on the light and air available to the Montaneros
owners. Moreover, there is no compelling reason that cau be given to support the issuance of a
variance. "Cost or inconrvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation
shall not be a reason for granting a variance." (See Town Code, Section 12-17-1.1.)
(d) Cbmpliance Burden. In accordance with Section 12-7H-8 of the Town
Code, Lion Square has t$e burden to prove to the PEC ttrat its proposed redevelopment
(i) complies with the pufposes of the LMU-I zone district, (ii) is consistent with applicable
elements of the Master Flan, and (iii) does not otherwise have a sigrrificant negative effect on the
character ofthe neighbcirhood. As described above, the proposed Lion Square redevelopment
plan fails to demonstratf compliance with any of these imporrant factors. On the contrary, the
location of both the eas! and the west towers of the proposed Lion Square buildings violate the
regulations of the LMU| I zone district, and both the east and west towers have a significant
negative effect on the npighboring property.
(a)
The Covenants were adopted for the benefit of all owners within the Vail/Lionshead Third
Filing, which includes both the Msntaneros and Lion Square properties, in order to establish and
maintain the character rand value of property in the Vail/Lionshead, Third Filing area. The
Covenants require the bpproval of an architectural contol committee of any proposed
improvements. Weur$etheTownofVail,asapartywithenforcementrightsunderSectionl9.l
of the Covenants, to taile into consideration the criteria for approval of development plans, which
criteria include "the effect of anyproposed improvement on thgoutlook of any adjacent or
neighboring property."
(b) iEasement. As referenced above, the Association granted an easement to
the Lion Square Nort$ Condominium Association" which easement allowed encroachment of the '
existing deck of the I lion Square building into tle Montaneros property. Lion Square has
utilized this for this sole purpose for approximately 30 years, and during that time the
y used tle area under the Lion Square deck for storage ofits pool
Upon its recent receipt of the plans for the proposed Lion Square
redevelopment, the ion first leamed that Lion Square intends to construct the east tower
of the Lion
permission for this u$e, and does not agree to this use.
{00038696 / 2}
t
Bill Gibson
April 21,2006
Page 5
As you may be aware, the Association recently completed a substantial renovation to the
Montaneros building. The Montaneros owners are supportive of the redevelopment of
Lionshead, as encouraged by the Master Plan, and they look forward to the continued
improvements to Lionshead. However, the Association respectfully submits that the
redevelopment oflion Square, as currently proposed, should be denied by the PEC.
Alternatively, the Association requests that the PEC table tlis application indefinitely to allow
the Montaneros and Lion Square owlers to work together on this project, continuing a dialog just
begun between the parties.
On behalf of the Association, we thank you for the opportunity to comment and be heard
on this matter'
very truly yours,
/s/ Alexander Preiser
Alexander A. Preiser
Enclosures
cc: Matt Mire
Rick Travers
Montaneros Condominium Association
Town of Vail Ptanning and Emironmental Commission
{00038695 / 2}
VIELE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
1000 S. FnoNrAcE RoiD WEsr, SturE 202
Veu"Coroneno 81657
Tclcphone (t0) 476-3m2
rax (to) 476-3423
July 24, 2005
Vail Town Cormcil
75 South Frontnge Rd. W€st
Vail, Colorado 81557
RE: Aaspoase to Montaaaw Appeal t?EC 060053, llron Squarc Loilge ll,Iaiot bnaiot ll4otion
Dear Council Members:
Please accep this correspondence as a formal response to the appeal of the approval of Planniqg anil
Environmental Commission Applicetion #060053 ffled by the Montaneros Condominium
Association.
The Major Exterior Alteration of Lions Square North received approval from the Plannlng
Commission on Jrme 26, 2006 by a vote of 5- I (Cleveland apposed). In approving tle apphcation,
the cammission formd, as &d the staff in their memo, that the project complied with zoning at
every level and met the intent of tle Lionshead Master pla::. Both the Commission and the Staff
went so far as to say that the desigrl, as approved, was more sensitive and respectfrrl to adjacent
prgpert,' owners to ttre Nort! than llkely zoning mmpliant altematives.
The HOA of the Lion Square No.rth anil the derelopment team have been nindfirl of the i-Pact
t}fs project wtll have on adjacent prop€rgr owners from the begirming oftle design process and
have taken great elforts to p,reserve ar mu& of the crrreut character of the ueigb'borhood qs the
economics of tbe project allow. TLc approved design amounts to 477o of tbe dlowable GRFA on
tle site anil 7370 of the avenge raxinr.rn height. Assuming tlat redevdopnent of this property is
' inevitable, it is the opinion of the HOA anil thc devdopcr that the proposed deolg' is a best-cage
scenario for the aqacent property ormers: All other reilevelopnent options iliscussed resuh in a
near maximization or total maximizatiob of the vested pnoperty r€hts of the Li,ou Square North
HOA,
The fionshead Master Plau was seated in an effort to stimulate redevelopment in the Lionshead
core area. As a result ofbuilding being granted aildidonal development rights, buildings in
Lionshead will get bigger and aone ploperty owncrs will lose t[eir unprotected views, as has been
the case with the numerour properties in the Lionshead Master Plan area. The Appellarrt's
properry beneffted from t}re implementation of thc master plan as did other properties in r[e
Master Plan area. Based on language in the Master Plan, thc Appellant was dlowed to increase the
height of the portion of their building tlat encroaches into the setbac&. kior to the Lionshead
Master Plan, the Appellant woutd have been required to obtain a variance and provcn a physical
l6rlshiF in order add pitched roof scu*ures on their building which by the de8nition in the zoning
code, increased tle height of a nonconforming sEucture. Tbe Lion SErare North re
will rmdoubteilly have an impact on tLe adjacent property owuers, jirst as the redevelopment of tbe
o
VIELE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
tOq) S. FnoNmcs Roeo \Mnsr, Surru 202
Verq Coroneno 81657
Telephoner (t0) 476-3082
Fax(970)a763a23
Montaneros bas had a negative irnpact on the Lion Square North. However, it is the opinion of ttre
Lion Sgpare Ncth HOA, rhe develo,per, and by virtue of tLeh meuro and vote, the Town of Vail
Planning Stalf and tbe PEC, tlat this redevdopmeirt is to ttre benefit of the toym and to Lioshead,
I mut that you wi! cone to the same conchrsion. The apped by ttre Montaneros raises a number of
issues that are addressed below:
Tnr APPzu-qNr |/,|s Nor DrxyIED trs Rrclrr ro a FIIII AND FAIR HEARTNG
Following a series of conceptual reviews of the project by the PEC, the project was tabled on May
22, 2006, for a Final Review to take place on June 26, 2006. The Appellant was present at that
meeting and spoke in favor of moving tle meeting to that date. On June 2, 2006, the development
team submitted ffnal plam to the town, Wbile it was not a reguirement of the developer to do so,
said plans were simultaneously distributed to the Appdlant as Dumerous nhanges to the design were
a result of discourse between the two parties. No changes to the strusture of the buildings were
made from that 6ro" 91hgr tha"r to shorten a roof overbang at the suggestion of the towu gtaff.
Further, said minimal c"hanges to the plans were di"cussed with the Appdlant prior to tle meeting,
Any sbteinent that tbe Appellant was unaware of the dcsign changes is a deliberate misstatement of
fact. Fur.tLer, the chariges had no impact on the buililing structure location or massing of the
proj ect.
Follovine ttre approval of the project by the Planning Comurission, the Appellant requested a copy
of the developer's proprietary computer model of the project. Said reguest was denied as ttre
developer had no obligation to provide the model to ttre Appellant, In no instances in tle Town of
Vail Code is an applicant regpired to p,rovide any materid to an adjacent ProP€tty owner. Rather,
adjacent propertl owaers are notiffed tlat informetion related to applications potentidly alfeciug
theL property are ou 6Ie with the Town of Vail. All doctrments reguired by the Torrn of Vail
related to this application heve been submitted to the town. The Town did not require tle
applicant to proviile the computer model nor docs the Town require an applicant to submit a
plysical model for tte record.. Tte approved plans for ttre projec were ou ffIe as prblic record
with &e Town of Vail, to which tle ippellant had full access and from whicl the Appdlant could
build a model of their own.
THE EAST TowER oF TTTE LION S'QIIARI IODGE - NORTH BUII,DING, AS AFROVED BY THE PEC' Is
NOT AT.T IMPERMISSABII E CANSION OF A NON-CONFORIIING STRUCTURE
The east tower coDstsuction will occur outgide of the setback anil €asement. As sudl, it is
permitted by zoning and no variance is required. There will be no increase or chaoge to the beight
or footprint of the existing noncouforming sruslure located in the setbac!. The ercisting b"ildlttC
will receive new e<terior ffrrishes in kecping with tLe renovatiou of the building and the Design
Guidelines. The towu stalfand PEC botl found tbat no variance was required beca,use the
noncorming portion of Lions Square North Building will only receive maintenance wttb this
proposal .
2 of6
I o
VIELE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
1000 S. Fnovrn cE RoAD WEsr, SurrE 202
If.liilf,Hif-,?1fi1
Eax(no\$6-3423
Please note that while previous iterations of the design contemplated inoeasing tle height of t.he
portiur of the Lions $gparc Nortb building located in ttre side setba&, which is an enisting tlre non-
conforming structure, the app,rovcd d.esigu does not..
THE PARKTNG STRucruE DoEs NorYrol^arB ANy SETBASKS
The PEC and the Staff both ageed tf,at the partially covered surface parking does not violate any
setbacJ<s and as zuch is zoning compliant, The surface parking located in the setba& is allowed by
the zoning code aad oceurs on numerous properties tlroughout the Town of Vail. No variances.are
requireil and no variances bave been requested.
Please note that previous iterations oftlre design contemplated building a endosed parking
sEucture to the pro'perty line in an e{fort to ceate a courtyard, as identGed in the Master PIan.
The design was modi6.ed to comply witb setback etanderds and ttrerdore does not require a
variance,
THE WFsr Towxn Dors j\tor VIoLATE THr SPIRIT oF TI{E SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: RATHER,
THE AIPEU.ANT ENCRoACHES INTo THE SETBACK
The construction of the west tower is 20 feet from the propcrty line. The exit stairway extends 4
to 6 fiom the face of the west tower, thereby making it 14 to 16 Get from the property line. The
side setback for this area is 10 feet.
It should be noted that portions of the Alpdlant's hrililing encroar:hes as nuch as 9 feet into t,he 10
foot side getback, The non-conformity was <reated by the developer of the Appdlauts property
when lot 8 was arbdirided and soLl to the develryer of the Liolr Square North Buitding. The non-
conformlng condition was approved by the tov,'n at the time of tLe subdivbion. No additiond
restdcdons were applied to the Lion Square North to mair:tain the tpirit of the setbadd As guch,
any tszuer relating to building proximity are by tle Appellants own doing, The olrent developer
should not be held responsible for the non-conformity of the Appellant.
Staff Commene on page 14 of their me'.o to the PEC, that the impact of the redevelopment is
conpormdeil by ttre Appellant's own non-confomilr.
".,.Howev€r, the non-confior:ning, close pro:cimity of the Monwreros building to the Lion
\uare North property line (ess tban 1 foot) and the location of t[e Montaneros swimming
pool patio (6 feet &om the property line, 3 feet from the easement) exacerbate the shading
elfect of ttris proposal. Staffbdieves tle applicant's two ntower likeo elenents will bave
less impad to srm/shade and private y1q6 thrn s1f,6r desip altematives all,owed by zoning
and the Town's Comprehensive Plan."
3 of6
o
VIELE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
lfi)O S. FRoNracE RoAD WEsr, SrtrTE2o2
VA[,CoLoRADo 81657
Telephone (90) 476-3082
Eax(970) 476-3423
THE PI,ANNING COMMISSION AND THE TOWN OF VAIL STAFT FOUND THE REDEYELOPMENT PLAN
TO BE IN KEEPING WIrI{ fiII IIONSHEAD RDEVH.oPME\TTMA$TN, PI.{N
The staff and tle PEC were in agreement that the aFproved project is h keeping with the Lionshead
Master Plan. On page 12 of the stalf memo delivered to the PEC, Staff coroments Ge project
complies witl the Master plan.
"Stafr believes the applicant has addressed this plan recommendation by designing 'tower-
like' additions to the west and east ends of the existing Lion Sggare North building, The
existing building bas an east west axis orientation which can not be re-oriented without lhe
demolition of tte existing building. Stalf believes the proposed "tower-like" additions ivill
have much less impact to sun access or view than a zoning compliant ilesign adding
bulk/mass and height over a larger area, or the entire area, ofthe existing building'"
THE PI.ANI.ING CoMMIssIoN AND TowN oFYAIL STAFF BoTH oPINED TIIAT THE DEYELOPMENT
PROVIDES SUFFICIENT PIIBUC BENEflTS SUCH THAT THE IMPACTS OF ITS DEYELOPMENT ARE
MITIGATED
The staff and the PEC both opined that tte e'n enities provided by the development mitigate any
development activity. Plgase refei to "Attachment A" of this letter for a detailed description of
development mitigation. A summary of the pubtc beneffts is as follow
e New Reail Use- No retail use curendy exists on the pro'perty
r Parking Garage - The current parking coudition does not meet ttrc zoning stanilar&: This
redevdopment bri4gs the parking conditioa into donpliance
o Enployee Housing
. Streetscapelmprbvements
o SubstantidlandsEaping
o Pedesrian Access
I Sreet aud Site I+htirg
o Trafrc tnpact Fee (Amount to be determined by the Town of Vail)
o Aesthetic and Functional Upgrade to the property
. Upgraded, code-compliant Fire End ljfe Safety System
. Increased tax basi by 24,00O sguare feet
o thder - Utilizedl developmeut potential
THr PJ.,aNNING CoMMrssloN AND TowN oF VAIL PIAI.n IING AND PIDIIC woRI6 STAFF AII
IOUND THE PARKING PI.ANTO BE SI.EFICIEI{T
o
4 of6
VIELE DEVETOPMENT, LLC
1000 S.IRor,rracE RoAD WEsf,, SurrB 202
YArr, CoroRADo 81657
Telephone: (970) 476J082
Fax(97O)176-3423
The Tou'n of Vail Public works Staff, the Planning staff and the PEC all found the parking plan to
be acceptable. It should be noted tlat the clu:rent parking condition ir not zoning compliant. The
redevelo'pm.ent brings the prop€trty into compliancc.
THE PRoPosED REDEYELoPMEI\TT wLLNoTREQUIRE A SINGIT EASEMTNT FROMT}IEAFPHJ.ANT
The construction of the Dew towers and the parking structure will not require the applicant to coss
the property line onto the Appellant's property either dr:ring construction or in perpetuity, As
sucb no construction or p€rmaneat easeutents will be required
hevious iterations of the design contemplated a structure tlat would require soil nailing on ttre
Appellants property. The design of tie structure has been modi.ffed such that structural support
will be proviiled t}rough pilings, thereby negating the need for soil nailing. Therefore, no
easements will be required from the Appellant.
THx pRorEcTIyE CovB.lAMS Anr apRrvATE MATTER THAT Is Nor rHE pERvIElw oFTHE TowN
Couxclr
Any issue related to covenants governing this propcrty or any other in Lionshead Filing 3, are.
private in natr:re and are not the juris&ction of the Town of Vajl.
However, for the edification of the Council; The Covenants referred to by the Appellarit are set
forth in ttre original subdivision of the Vail Uonshead Third Filiug, Eagle Cormty, recorded oo
October 15r197L. The covenants pre-<late the establisbment of the Design Review Board and the
Comprehensive Zoni4g Regulations set forth in Ordinance No. 8, 1973. hior to tlat &te, d""i8p
control and zouiug cortol was achieved tlrough covenant. Since tlat tine, design review bas been
contolled by the Tovm of Vail DRB.
The Appellant's OWN recent renorntion friled to conveue or enlist the participation of the
Architectrrd Control Commlttee, as reqrtred by tle coveDants referred to in thcir appeal. As
su&, one can either Eurmise that the Appellant is in violation of the very covenant tLey now wish to
' enforce, or the covenant, as it rclates to dasign control, is obsolete.
THE EMpr.oyE Housnrc Pnoposer,DoEs SATrsryTlu,E 12, CHATTER 13 oFTtIE CoDE
'flre proposed eruployee housing soludou meets the current requirements goveming errployee
housing in t ionshead. While it is desirable to have the EHU on site, it is uot required by tle zoning
code nor bas it been required of other recent building renovadon/construction projects. It should
be noted tlat prior to design modi$cations tbat were requested by the Appellant, the EHU was
provided on site, Dcsign modiffcations lntended to mitigate the proximity of the appdlant'r
building resulted in the modiEcation ofthe entance to the upper level parking deck. The eotrance
5 of6
I o-
VIELE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
1000 S. FRolrrAGE RoADwEsr, SurrE 202
VarrrCoLoRADo 81657
Telephone: (t0) 475-3082
Fax (970) 47C3a23
moved &om north of the west building, ailjacent to the proporcy line, to under the west tower and
1f,s1'6\ alirvrinated the space aontemplatcd for and EHU. The developer is more than vjlling to
accommodate ttre employee housi4g regufoenent on site provided ttre Cormcil is arnenable to
moving tle entrance to the secord dec.k of parking back to its original location.
It should be noted that Commissioner Cleveland indicated tbat tbe only reason he objeced to the
project was his desire to see employee housing on site.
Suiuru-env
The design as proposed rip"esents a fraction of tle square footage that the current zoning allows
and complies with all zoning regulations. The Town of Vail Planning stalf and the Planning and
Environrnental Commission have con6:.'med ttre compliance by their actions, The Appellants basis
for appeal is inconsistent with the current intelpretation and application of the zoning standards as
they are administered by the TOV Staff. The applicant has strived to meet and exceed the
requirements of the Town of Vail zoning code. We have designed auil planned this project to be
100 % use by right and have modi$ed initid designs whose conformity would have been sublect to
debate. We rust t}at ydu will ffnd the same to be true,
We look forward to the Ppportunity to present this project to the Torvn Council. Thank you for
vour time and consideration.
Best Regards,
5:{{,tr(
David Viele
Manager
6 of6
1
I
Colorado SNOTEL Snowpack Qrmparison Update Report
O
Page I of4
@
Partnerships i Contact UsNWCC Home , About Us . Products I Publications News i
Colorado SNOTEL Snowpack Comparison Update Report
Based on Mountain Data from NRCS SNOTEL Sites
'i*Provisional data, subject to revislonr*
Data based on the flrst reading of the day (typically 00:00) for Tuesday, May 23, 2006
Basan
Site Name
Elev(ft)
Snow Water Equivalent
Current a6
Percent of' 2005
Cuffent as
Percent of
Average
.2OOS as
Percent of
Averag€
Curfent
(in)
2005
( in)
Average
(iil)
GUNNISON RIVER BASIN
BUTTE 10160 0.0 4.0 3,9 0 n 103
COCHETOPA PASS 10020 o,2 0.0 N/A
COLUMBINE PASS 9400 0,4 0.0 2.0 20 u
IDARADO 9800 nt 0.0 2,L 5 0
MC CLURE PASS 9500 0.0 0.0 3,9 o 0
MESA LAKES 10000 0.3 14,6 7,4 2 4 197
OVERLAND RES.9840 0.2 5,1 3,3 4 6 155
PARK CONE 9600 0.0 0.0 0,5 0*0*
PARK RESERVOIR 9960 9.3 41.3 24,1 23 39 t7L
PORPHYRY CREEK 10760 0,3 5.4 7,3 6 4 74
RED MOUNTAIN PASS 11200 6,8 20.6 20.r 33 34 102
SCHOFIELD PASS 10700 .M 34.3 25.9 132
SLUMGULUON 11440 1.2 8,8 6,9 74 L7 128
Basin-wide percent of average t9 23 t25
UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN
ARAPAHO RIDGE 10960 13.5 17.7 21,7 76 62 82
ARROW 9680 3.7 6.0 5 3 62
BEAVER CK VILLAGE 8500 0.0 0,0 0.0
BERTHOUD SUMMIT 11300 7.9 12.8 16.6 62 48
BISON LAKE 10880 21,9 26.9 27,r 81 81 99
BUFFALO PARK 9240 u.z 0,0 0.9 22*0*
COPPER MOUNTAIN 10550 1.5 4.5 33 '2L 53
FREMONT PASS 11400 18.6 13.7 19.2 136 97 7t
GRIZZLY PEAK 11 100 1.3 10.0 46 6 13
HOOSIER PASS 11400 3.9 7.5 9.0 52 43 83
INDEPENDENCE PASS 10600 0.3 2.6 J.l l2 5 46
IVANHOE 10400 n?5.3 7.5 6 4 7l
JONES PASS 10400 9.9 8.4 4.9 118 202 L7L
KILN 9500 0.0 0.0 1,8 0 0
LAKE IRENE 10700 EC 13.1 20,9 42 26 63
LYNX PASS 8880 0.1 0.0 1.6 6 'l
MC CLURE PASS 9500 0.0 0.0 3.9 0 0
hnp://www.wcc,nrcs.usda.gov/reportsAJpdateReport.html jsessionid=EE05578D4283152... 05123/2006
a
Colorado SNOTEL Snowpack Comparison Update Report Page2 of 4
MCCOY PARK 9480 o 0.10.2 0
MESA LAKES 10000 0.3 14.6 7.4 2 4 t97
MIDDLE FORK CAMP 8940 0.1 0.0 0.4 25,0l
NAST LAKE 8700 0,3 0,0 0.6 50*0.
NORTH LOSTTMIL 9200 0.1 ?q 3.0 3 3 130
PHANTOM VALLEY 9030 0.1 0.0 t.4 7 0
SCHOFIELD PASS 10700 -M 34.3 25.9 132
STILLWATER CREEK 8720 -M 0.0 0.0
SUMMIT RANCH 9400 0.0 0.0 L,4 0 u
VAIL MOUNTAIN 10300 10,0 11.6 L9,2 86 52 60
WILLOW CREEK PASS 9540 L,4 10.4 7,4 13 19 141
Basin-wide percent of average 6t 4S ao
SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASTN
BEAR LAKE 9500 4,3 tL,4 t2.2 38 35 93
BUCKSKIN JOE I 1150 2.5 2E 5,9 7l 47 59
COPELAND LAKE 8600 0;2 0.0 0.0
DEADMAN HILL t0220 8.6 13.3 15.4 65 56 86
ECHO LAKE 10600 0.1 4,6 5,9 2 2 78
HOOSIER PASS 11400 3.9 7.5 9,0 52 43 83
JACKWHACKER GULCH 10950 1.1 5,1 58 22 37
JOE WRIGHT 10120 12.4 17.6 21.4 70 58 82
LAKE ELDOM 9700 0.0 0.0 1.8 0 0
LOVELAND BASIN 11400 16,2 14.0 18.8 116 85 74
MICHIGAN CREEK 10600 2,5 3.7 4.6 62 50 80
NIWOT 11300 o.2 4.3 5.0 5 4 86
ROUGH AND TUMBLE 10360 0,1 0.0 2,4 5 0
UNIVERSITY CAMP 10300 11, 1 12,4 15.7 90 7l 79
WILLOW PARK 10700 0.8 7.3 11.8 11 62
Basin-wide percent of average 63 47 7S
LARAMIE AND NORTH PLATTE RIVER BASINS
AMPAHO RIDGE 10960 1? q 77.7 21.7 to 62 82
COLUMBINE 9150 0.3 0,0 7.2 4 0
DEADMAN HILL 10220 8.6 13.3 15.4 65 56 86
JOE WRIGHT 10120 t2,4 L7.6 2t.4 70 58 a2
LAKE IRENE 10700 f,.5 13.1 20.9 42 zo 53
NEVER SUMMER 10280 13.4 19.3 20.3 69 66 95
RABBIT EARS 9400 5.5 9.1 20.3 50 27 45
RAWAH 9020 0,0 0.0 8.5 0 0
ROACH 9700 0.3 8.0 9.7 4 3 82
TOWER 10500 40.7 37.3 48.7 109 84 77
WHISKEY PARK 8950 18.9 21.0 21.3 90 89 99
WILLOW CREEK PASS 9540 L,4 10.4 7,4 13 19 141
ZIRKEL 9340 2.6 6.6 7.4 39 35 89
Basin-wide percent of average 7L 53 ?5
http://www.wcc,nrcs.usda.gov/reports/lJpdateReport.htrnl jsessionid=EE05578D4283152... 05/23/2006
Colorado SNOTEL Page 3 of4
AMPA AND WHITE RIVER BASINS
BATTLE MOUNTAIN 7440 0.3 0.0 0.0
BEAR RIVER 9080 0.1 0.5 N/A 20
BISON LAKE 10880 21.9 26.9 27.L 81 81 99
BUFFALO PARK 9240 0.2 0.0 0.9 22'0.
BURRO MOUNTAIN 9400 0.3 0.0 6.9 4 0
COLUMBINE 9160 0.3 nn 7.2 4 0
cRosHo 9100 0,1 0.0 1.9 0
DIVIDE PEAK 8880 0,0 4.7 8.1 0 0 58
DRY LAKE 8400 0.0 0.0 5.4 0 0
ELK RIVER 8700 0.0 0.0 3.8 o 0
UTTLE SNAKE RIVER 8915 4.8 13.1 N/A 37
LOST DOG 9320 1.5 L4.6 28.8 10 5 51
LYNX PASS 8880 0.r 0.0 tA 6 0
MBBIT EARS 9400 5,5 9.1 20.3 60 27 45
RIPPLE CREEK 10340 15.3 16.2 19.4 94 79 84
SANDSTONE RS 8150 0.6 0.0 1.5 40 0
TOWER 10500 40.7 1.'t a 48.7 109 84 77
TMPPER LAKE 9700 0.0 0.0 12.1 0 0
WHISKEY PARK 8950 18,9 21.0 21.3 90 89 99
Basin-wide percent of average 77 t9 60
ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN
APISHAPA 10000 0.0 0.0 o.2 0*0*
BRUMLEY 10600 0,0 0.0 3.3 0 0
FREMONT PASS 11400 18.6 13.7 L9,Z 135 97 7L
GLEN COVE 11460 0.1 1.9 N/A 5
PORPHYRY CREEK 10760 0.3 5.4 7.3 6 4 74
SOUTH COLONY 10800 0.4 1't a 10.2 2 4 t70
WHISKEY CK 10220 0.1 o,7 4*14*343*
Basin-wide percent of average 48 47 95
UPPER RIO GRANDE BASIN
BEARTOWN 11600 -Il 24.6 18.0 137
COCHETOPA PASS 10020 0.2 0,0 N/A
CULEBM #2 10500 0.0 5.4 1,5 0 0 360
CUMBRES TRESTLE 10040 -M 19.4 tt. v 218
GRAYBACK 11620 0.1 1.3 N/A 8
LILY POND 11000 0.2 5.1 5.1 4 4 100
MEDANO PASS 9549 0,0 0.0
MIDDLE CREEK 11250 o.2 L4.7 13.9 1 1 106
TRINCHERA 10860 0.1 0.0 0.4 25*
UPPER RIO GRANDE 9400 o.4 0.0 0.0
UTE CREEK 10650 0.3 4.0 0.6 8*50 667'
WOLF CREEK SUMMTT 11000 15.4 48.0 33.2 32 46 145
Basin-wide percent of average 22 30*t49
http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/reportsAJpdateReport.html jsessionid=EEOs578D4283152... 05n312006
Snowpack
fnnarison :**.
RePort
; Colorado SNOTEL SnouPack Comparisona Update Repot Page 4 of4
MIGUEL, DOLORES, ANIMAS AND SAN JUAN RIVER BASINS
CA5CADE 8880 0.0 0.0 0.3 0*
COLUMBUS BASIN 10785 nn 30.1 18.0 0 0 t67
EL DIENTE PEAK 10000 o,2 0.0 ?1 o 0
LIZARD HEAD PASS 10200 0.1 3.3 RC 3 1 39
LONE CONE 9600 0,0 0.0 1.3 0*0*
MANCOS 10000 0.0 0.0 4.5 0 0
MINERAL CREEK 10040 0.3 3.8 4.6 I 7 83
MOLAS I.AKE 10500 -M 9.4 9.9 95
RED MOUNTAIN PASS 11200 b.d 20.6 20,1 33 34 102
SCOTCH CREEK 9100 0.0 0.0 0.0
SHARKSTOOTH L0720 0.0 17.0 N/A 0
SPUD MOUNTAIN 10660 0.0 21.8 17,2 0 0 127
STUMP LAKES 11200 .M 25.9 t7.o t52
UPPER SAN JUAN 10200 0.2 38.9 18.2 I I 214
VALLECITO 10880 0.2 t7.o 6.2 3 274
WOLF CREEK SUMMIT 11000 15.4 48,0 33.2 32 46 145
Basin-wide Percent of average L2 L7 135
-M = Mlssing data'
t = Analysis may not provlde a valid measure of condltions.
N/A = No average avallable'
The sNow WATER EQUIVALENT represents the depth of water In the snowpack, if the
snowpack were melted, expressed in inches.
contact your state water supply staff for assistance.
Reference period for average conditions is 1971-2000'
Provislonal data, subject to revision.
^ Back to Top Site Map I Contact I Webmaster I NRCS I USDA I Firstcov
http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/reports/tJpdateReport.html jsessionid=EE05578D4283152... 05/23/2006
t
,'
PEAK LAND CONSULTANTS, INC.
PEAK I.AND SURVEYING, INC
PEAK CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC
1000 LtoN's R|DGE LOOP, VA|L, CO 81657 .
PHONE 97S47&8644
FAX 97G476{616
MEMO
FROMz L. Mark Luna. P.E.
fOB No.z 1257.1
DATEz 05-08-06
(dfu?\-4.
TOz Town of Vail Public Works
ATTN: Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer
RE: Lions Square Nortb - Sight Distance Issues
The following is a summary of all the sight distances and issues for both driveway locations.
The criteria used are 3.5' eye and object heights and a design speed of l5 mph.
WEST DRMWAY: This driveway has been relocated to the north approximately 30'.
Looking Right: There is clear sight distance ofthe entire intersection of Lionshead Circle
and Lionshead Place.
Lookine Left: The existing configuration allows for 90' of sight distance. By moving
the driveway to tle north, we have increased the distance without changing the line of
sightto ll7'.
SOUTH DRMWAY: New Driveway location.
Looking Right: The sight distance as shown on the DRB submittal is 87'. According to
AASHTO criteria, this distance is calculated to be 170' plus a l.l factor adjustment for
grade, resulting in I 87'. This criteria can not be met with the proposed configuration.
Looking Left; The sight distance as shown on the DRB submittal is 8l'. Site constraints
such as the pathway along the top of the wing wall down to the tunnel; restrict the
possibility of increasing this distance. According to AASHTO criteria, the sight distance
is calculated to be 145'. AASHTO does not show a reduction factor for grades over 6010,
but interpolating from the tables it appears a 0.9 reduction factor would apply; resulting
in a 130' sight distance.
In order to mitigate the sight distance issue on the south driveway it is proposed to install
a detection system alerting vehicles leaving the driveway to vehicles approaching from
the tunnel. At a minimum, the detection would be located at the distance equal to the
sight distance. The warning would either alert stopped vehicles to approaching traffic or
alert the driver when a right tum is safe. Specific recommendations on signage and
detection location would be provided by a traffic engineer specializing in signal design.
If the mitigation sgems like a viable opion, we would proceed on a more detailed proposal. If
you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to call.
Ptl200-lnAr257.l\docs\1257.1 - Sight disianoa 2.doc
PEAK IAND CONSULTANTS' INC.
PEAK LAND SURVEYING' INC
PEAK CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC
1000 LloN'S RTDGE LOOP, VAIL co 81657
PHONE Src'476{644
F$( 970-47S8616
MEMO
TOz CommunitYDweloPment
ATTNz Bill Gibson
FROLIz L. Mark Luna' P.E.
JOB No.z 125'l.l
DATEz 04'24'06
RE:LionsSquareNorth-PublicWorksComment#5(8'ConcretePan)
The following addresses item #5 of the Public works comm.ents datd April 13, 2006
r"f.o*"iog tie proposed 4' pan and its ability to carry the 1O&year flows'
Peak is proposing 4' pan widths across both driveway e1rtances inst€ad of ttre required 8'pan for
****riai/*"ffr-family dwelopmslts. Frs! we are confident a 4' pan will be adequate due to
the proximity of a ilrainige inletis' above thc north entrance. Lions Square North
Lopror,..**tr will also ooa to install an additional inlet just south-of the north etfranse
Oo"for" reducing the drainage area con&ibuting to thesaflows to the south enh'ance' We are in
tlr. *;r of obiining the d"ainug" teport for this roadway to confirm or:r desip.
Also, our desip provides for a 4' across the driveways as well as a 5' sidewalk with a 2% cross
,fop". Witfr tfr*'*ongr]rution, there is almost n9 -disruption
of pedestian 1affic flow' If an 8'
pan we"e instatled, we would not be able to provide a sidewalk and pedestians would have to
cross the drivewaYs in the Pan.
If indeed the numbers do not support our assertion" we will provide th9 8' pan as requested but
*" fr"t *" -uy not be able to pto.'ia" the sidewalk due to tle pedestian t.affic flow issue'
TUII}I0rult
ffi/ffifr * ks & Trans Port at ion
1309 Elkhorn DrNe
Vail, CO E1657
97M79-2158
Fa:t:970-479-2166
www.vailgov.com
MEMO
To:
CC:
From:
Re:
Date:
Bill Gibson
Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer
ii;;t Sfi" Loage No'itt Redevelopment Plan PEC Review
3l2l106
The Town of Vail Public Works Department has reviewed the Lions Square Lodge North Plans dated 3113106'
Thefollowingcommenlshallbeaddressedpriortoapproval.
General Comments
l.Provideengineeredanalysisofstoppingsitedistance.Theanalysismustatminimummeetcntena
set forth in the AASHTO design guide'
,, square Lodge North with a grade_
2. The Anabelte ;t;;;;;t;#d"ing the walk in front'of Lion
separation from the foad/access a,iu" i,, o,a., to maintain u"""puut. slopes on the walk. The newly
proposed access by Lions Square r."ag" u*"t' this grade '"p*u'ion'
thus possibly resulting in walk
slopes and ur."r"Liu" crosi slopes "ilii"ilpf'""tE ;h;* ;*il;inthis area' The walk should be
maintained at the approved Arrabelle pil ;;"d"t and the u"""tt &iu" cross slope shall be no more
3, $3"1f;"" above two comments.starr**ry::!; 1"H:*:J;TT::i:lt:t;tnthe
northwest'
4. Show the installed and proposed "tild;, ;;;;po."a on trt" uppto*a attuu"lle plans' specifically
s. ffil:t#J:.'Jffi#JJ,lJ:,tr"ryl,li* ** 2,, invert unless proven thar a 4' pan with r" inverr
can carry 100 Yr flows'
6. Show drivewaycross slope grading onboth access points'
7. Grading in east altey is siigntty diff;;;;;;tt" upprou.a proposed Anabelle plans' Please
modifY'g. show sight distance triangle on landscape plan as well as on site plan' All landscaping shalt comply
with sight distance triangle requirements'
g.CoordinatelightingptanwithAnaue,lle"ptun'st,o'Anabellelightingonlightingplan'
11. iruru;m:lx.t;',ru:li','i"Hfr"#"1,'J'lu"il,"rn,thane'inwidth.
(r.e thetotar
width for the 9 adjacent parking ,p";;ilffiU" gr', iiscales at 80'5'') Please veriff' Also show
tz. fm::l;nru;i,ffi";t"tffirt'"t#f t'Jfff:ill-Ti 'n"
site pran, prease update the
aPProPriate Plan'
13.Showhowthesurfacepu'Gspaces5'6'Ttumaroundandget""'fUshowhowtheparallel
space 4 gets in and oul
elease piouide copy of prescriptive encrbachlen] easement'
provide easement for any public utilitie, on p.inut"-il|
-ii'"'
it the transformer on the NW corner for
Holy Cross?)
il"#$*ltlltJi[i;- samse structure is- shown ro be removed. How w'l this grade separation be
,"roln"d? If by wall it can not be greatet than o' '
How will the excavation be shored'. Is an easement required from. adjacent properfy owners?
The traffic report dated Ziiiniiiarc^t", op to ri uaaiiional condo units and 650 SF of retail space
is proposed. prior to r*ufupprorut the nattrc.snrdi-strall -q" "nd.*d,,:
reflect the most updated
plans and a traflic i*pu"t-f"i'Jall be assessea to ea"tt additional peak hour generated trip'
boes this development require a loading bay?
14.
15.
16,
t7.
18.
19.
20.
L please add the Town of vail General Notes. (Notes can be e'mailed upon request)
2. please add Utility sie""t*" ur""t -a nou" uiittiiitl* ttg"l"t""*t*gtle..**fryt: {:1IY design'
3, AII construction u"riiiu firlrrr"rn;u'u" t.r"w"a prior to c--onstruction including staging, phastng' access'
schedules, taffic control' emerg€ncy access' etc" '
4. A public wuv p"*ii-rr,uri u" Jttuin"a and approved by the Town of vail prior to cornmencrng any
, fTiffit:?irl$:*:"lri:tff#1"*,n shau be recorded for all private propertv improvements located
within public ways. ,-^--^--ii o-,r +ernnnr.arv easements are recorded
6. prior to approval of a Building permit all necessary permanent and temporary easements are rec
,. #TrTtjf,rf;j#fl"f a Building permit a shoring and excavarion plan shall be submitted including;
excavation phasing, engineered shoring g]*t'frt;1-|;ffi1" lnJ "rott
sections' cross sections and
pf"* tft"ff inctuae an &itting conflicts-(i'e' utilities)'
g. Any excavation shoring methods used.that;;;;;;;p"t adjacent public or private property shall have
approval uv *,. upprop?i*, o*", *g Br:-";;;;a"il"r"ti"tr prior to construction' cunentlv cDoT
does not allow any shoring within their ROW ii"ftaitg soil nails-without approval and a permanent
lease and an environmental assessme"t. If td;;;;;considered.contact bbOf as soon as possible'
9. A cDpHE permit, a copy of the ,ror,n*ur", **u!l*?"ipr-, -a all applicable ACOE permits (i'e'
- ;";;*itg) shall be tuu*itted prior to construction'
10. provide tull civit "orrrt
u.tion drawings .""d;?-;; of Vail standards prior to building permit
submittal.
o o
Couuuttrv DeveLoPMENT Rourlruc Fonnrt
Routed To:TuUtic Works
Date Routed:03/14/06
Routed By:BillGibson
Date Due:09t22106
660 West Lionshead
Status:
I Approved n Approved with conditions 3 Denied.
Comments:
Fire lssues. Need addIlonqllevigl!Fire
Date Reviewed:
- fi95,,;,w- It .- fa--- 4M--.9
- Slnt--- Lo^,.r- s" {--C- I
-r.n
t .?
- Lr,-.,€-t(1 / c t-z .-"--At'
VIELE DEVETOPMENT, LLC
I 000 S. FRoNTAcE RoAD WEsr, SlurE 202
VArL, CoLoRADo 81657
Telephoae: (97 o) 47 6?0S2
Fax (97o\ 17(.?4zt
luly 24,2006
Vail Town Council
?5 South Frontage Rd. West
Vail, Colorado 81557
RE: Sarpoase ro Cauncil Call-up oJPlanning and Ewtuonmutal C-ommission (PEC) Applicotioa #060053
Dear Council Members:
This correspondence shall serve to ad&ess concerns raised by various Town Council members in
their cail up of PEC application # 05005 3; A major exterior alteratiou to the Lion Sguire North
Building. Please note that the Project was approved by ttre PEC by a vote of 5-1 (Cleveland
apposed).
IJYEBEDS
The Lion Square Nort[ Buiding is cunendy comprised of 27 one and two bedroom condominium
units. Each and every unit is currendy the rental pool, whie.h is maqged by the Resort Company.
15" xio4l lgilrling bas generated and average of $999,668 in annual taxable rental i:rcome.over the
The approved plan includes nine new units of varying size. While it will not be a requirement of
purchase, eadr new unit will olfe.red participation in the rental pool. We expest ttrat bt a ",ini'nr,"'
half of tle units will opt for participation.
previous tlree yeats,
EMPIpYEHoUSING
The approved plan produces one additional employee per the Town of Veil employee generation
rates. (Please refer to the stalf memo along with a letter from tle Devdoper inc]uded as
"Attaclunent A" to this correspondence for a breakdown of t}is calculatiou) The approved plan
meets the employee housing requirement as deffned by current town code tlrough an offsite unit
with a minimum of 700 sguare feet. This proposal was fotmd to be accepable by the Employee
Housiug departrnegt and by ap menbers of tLe PEC wirtr the excq)tion of Commissioner
Cleveland. In his commentary on the project, Commissioner Cleveland stated that the only reason
he was voting against the project was his desire to see employee housing on site.
It should be noted for the record that the origind derign of the project included an employee
housing unit on site, Subsequent iterations of the desigr removed tle employee housing trnit as
mo&ffcations to the design to accommodate requests of adjac€nt property owners altered the
design.
E
VIELE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
I 000 S. FRoNTAGE RoAD WBsr, SrrrE 202
VArr, CoLoRADo 81657
Telephoner (nq 47€3082
Fax(%0)a7e3+23
The developer is reluctant to include employee bousing in the current design, First and foremost,
at the time the application was submitted, on site employee housing was not a reguirement. Any
maudate to indude such a use at this tine would constitute spot zoning. However, the developer is
"-endable to an adlusment in the desigo of the building tLat woulil result in the iaclusion of
employee housing on site. As you may be ai,v-are, ttre current proposal amounts to only 47% of the
allowable GRFA and can me mo&Eed to include ad&tional space. Our current design is ained at
maintaining as much of a view corridor through the property as possible, however we aie amenable
to adjustbg ttre view corridor to accommodate employee ho''"i''g
SUMMjRY-
The Lions Square North project, as approved, is 100o/o use by right and amounts to a.&action of
what could be deve\ed on ttre site. Various design iterations were investigated by this developer
as well as others to determine the best solution for a redevelopment of this site. We believe, as
does the HOA and the Staff and PEC by virtue of tleir recommendation and apprornl of the
proJect, that tle project is a net posidve for Lionshead and the Town of Vail. It will increase tle
bed base in Lionshead, provide anew retail use tlat currendy does not exist, provide 1 deed
. resFicted EHU withia the town bormdaries as well as provide new landscaping and sreetscape
improvements arou:rd.ttre project. Most imp.ortantly, the econorn-ics of this project allow a needed
upgrade to a tired, aest$etically unappealing bulding that rvill preserve a significant portion ofan
un-protected view corridor.
We loolc forward to discussing these issues as well as the project as a whole at t.be Town Council
meeting on August I't, 2006.
Kind Regards,
s:-(&(
David Viele
Manager
2 of2
YIELE DEVELOPMENT, tLC
1000 S. Fnox'recs RoaD WEsir, Sunr 202
VHr,rCorouoo 81657
Telephoner (Y/0) 47G3082
E x(n0r4763{23
Jure 20, 2006
Bill Gibson, AICP
Planner II
Town of Vail Planning Deparuacrrt
75 South Frontage Rd. West
Vail, Colorado 81657
RE: Mitigation of Developad Inpacrs
Dear Mr. Gibson:
Per the request of the Towi of Vail Planning and Euviroruueual Commission and per Sec$on 12-
7H-18r Vail Town Code, the follolrdng list represents the proposed measures to be taken by our
development tean to mibgate $lE.impact'of the re-development of the [,ioa Square North Building:
MrrrcATroN oF DEVELoPMENT IMpAcrs
New RetarJ Us
650 square feet of retail space will be ad&d to the North-East corner of tbe East Tower. TLe
current building does not have a retail or commcrciil usc on tLc.property, This aeni use will'provide
lncreaied vitality to t.he west end of t[e Arebdle Hotel. Th9 space will be situated asoss
from tle wegtern pedestriaa nrnnel of rie An:belle, thcneby extending the retail nrll,
Employee Houfrng
An off site employee housing rmit will be pur&ased and decd restricted by the developer. The r.rnit
will have a ninimum of one bedroom and 700 square feet and will be located in tbe town of Vail.
Parking / SoiI Roofed Cowqrctit
The redevelopment of t[e Lion Sqgare North Building will bring t]re curent parking situation lnto
compliance with the Lionsbead Mast€r plan and LMU zoniug. At ourent,. the property has 29
functioning parking spaces where J8 are required. The building bas been non-compliant since
initial occupancy of the building in 1974. The redevelopment will provide the required 38 parking
spots for the exisdng brrilding in addition.to the 15 new spaces required by tle incemental increase
in deosity and reail use ou tlt property. The parking will consist of onc level of rmder-ground
puking and a level of surface parking to bc covered by a sod roof, to the extent allowed by the
zoning sta.udar&, wbich ivill integrate with the adjacent property to the Nortb tbereby ceattng a
landscaped courtyard between the two buildings.
EGEIVE
JUN 212000
vIEtE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
1000 S. Fnon-racr RoeD WEsr, SurrE 202
VATL,CoLoRADo 81657
Telephone: (nqg6-3082
Eax (970) 476-3a23
Pedestrian Access
In 2005, an access eas."'ent was gfantcd to Vail Resorts by the Lion Square North Builrii.g HOA
to allow for vehicular antl pedertrian tra$c across tlre south side of the Lion Seuare North
Property. This easement was granted with {he expectation that the redevelopment of the Lion
Sguare North Building would be occurdng in the near future and the pedestrian access asoss the
Lion Square North property would add vitality to tle area and provide greater access to ttre new
Arrabelle Square.
Landscaping
In au elfort to provide a pedestrian experience in keeping with &e natural environment ltrat
surrounds our village, ttrd pedestian access through the south side of the Lion Sguare North
property will be heaviJy landscaped and will have a berm to.provide for separation from the ijon
Square North Building arrd the pedesrian way. On the North side, a sod roof will be built over the
. ffrst level parking deck to dre exent allowed by zoning, thereby aeati:rg a landscaped plaza that
integr.ates into the adjacent property's laridscaping.
Streetscape and Street Lighting
' The pedestrian access aro-und the south side of the Lion Scluare Norttr property will have a
streetscape consistent witb ttre streetsbape built by Vail Resorts for ttre Arrabelle project. In
adilition, the sidewails will bave site lights in keeping witl tle Lionshead Maiter Plan.
Tiafic Impact Fee
The devdoper will provide the Town with improvemints to ttre adjacent roadways and streetscape
equal to dollar amount deffned by Town of Vail plarming stalf and consistent with tralhc impact
fees of other approved projects.
Benelts proviileil to Vizil Resort.to Enable Arrabelle.and lionshead Redevelopment:
Numerous easements aud access agrecments were provided to Vail Resorts to allow for pedestian
an<l vehicular circulation, conseuction staging, yat€r retenFon and utility upgrades throughout the
core of Lionshead. All were granted with the oigectation and understanding tbat the
redevelopment of Arrabelle was in and of itself a beneflt to the community and tiat each easement
anil favor granted would in turn benefft the community of Lionshead as a whole.
2 of4
T#yT?:Ii13^:S,H**t:
Fax(nqn;t423
CoRoulny BENEFrrs or LJoN SquARE Nonrn Rrorvxormmn
Under Utilization of Development Potential
After substantial evaluation, the Uon Squarc North HOA and the developer c.hosc not to maximizc
redevelopment to the e:<tent PossiUe by zoning standards in an effort to maintain.as mu& of the
curent charicter of the neigbborhood as posdble. The Uonshead Master plan allows for
considerable bulk and mass: .the re-development plan, as proposed, amounts to a fraction of whit
could be,built on the property nnder current zoning. The proposed project has less'than 47% of the
GRFA allowed on the site and is 73% of the average heigbt allowed. WLile developmert optionsI remain for the property, current design m"ku,
"
rid"neiop*ent beyond tbe propor"d ,"op"
unlikdy.
Great care and attention was paid to respecting the acale .rri "ho."to of the neigbborhood,
specilically wit} regard'to adjacent property owners. The design as contemplated ensures the
majority of views from the North will be mdntained and preserved.
Aesth:etic and Functiond lfpBrade to the Prcperty
Whlle the direct benedt of the proposed redevelopment will acsue to the property owners of the
Lion Square North Building, tle plan provides for a needed upgrade to an old and architecturally
unrppealing building. The Lionshead Mastcr Plan xras created with the intcntion ofproviding
owners and developers with the incentire to upgade and improve thcir propcrties ruih tbat the
eatire comnr.nrity of Lionshaad and Vail as a whole would benefft. We feel thc proposcd design
a&ieves that goal and will providc a substantial upgrade while ceating addidond economic vitality
to the area.
lfpgtaded Ftue anil IiJe SqfeE S.ystem..
We recognize that tJre beneftt of an improved and code comphant systein will accrue to the owDer
and is rnandated by the Towu of Vail. However! it is import nt 1o trsls thal thic redevelopment is
allowing that to bappen in,a timely manner, with a mtnimal impact to the surrounding areas.
Siraply put, the economics of the proposed plan allow for this upgrade, Given tle inseasing ffre
danger in our region and tbc ability of a 6re to spread quickly in our Valley, each and every upgrade
can be viewed as benetting t[e whole
3.of 4
o
VIELE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
1000 S. Fnor.rracE RoAD WEsr, SurrE 202
VAu., CoLoRApo 81657
Tqlephoner (970) 476-3082
. I?x (970) 176-1121
sumrvrenv
'The proposed development plan represents over ffvc years of planning and numerous iterations of
development proposals investigated by the Lion Sguare North HOA. The plan as proposed was
recendy voted on by each of the individual owners of the Uou Square Nortb Building. Tbe project .
received urranimous support from owners, with 100% of the 27 owners voting in favor of the
project.
The currerit plan complies with tfie Lionshead Master Plan and exceeds tbe requirements set forth
for development irnpact mitigation elforts. We have included a retail use ttrat currendy does not
exist on thb property, have covered the parking to the extent zoning orrrendy allows, we have
developed less than half of the GRFA we are allowed under crurent zoning and are 30% below the
average height reguirements. In suimar1r, we have gone to great lengtbs to be rrindi:l of adjacent
property owners and have made mdjor modi.ffcations to our design in an elfort to address some of
tbe concerns that they have raised. Most irnportandy, we have rnaintained a view corridor thro"gh
the Lion Square Norttr property.
We look forward to the opportunity to present this project to the Planning and Environmeutal
.Commission, Thark you for your time and consideration.
Best Regards,
J4tu=
David Viele
Murager
4of4
:!
II
vIEtE DEVELOP,MENT, LLC
1000 S. FRoNTAGE RoAD WEsr, SUITE 202
Yerr,CotonaDo 81557
Telephone: (n0) 47 6-3082
Iax(n\a75-3a23
Juue 23, 2006
BiIl Gibson, AICP
Plarurer iI
Town of Vail Planning DeparEoent
75 South Fqontage Rd' West
Vail, Cblorado 81657
REz Sumnbrsr oJ efo* made tt comotunicdte with adiaccnt p)opeft/ owners
Dear Mr. Gibson:
Per your recommendation, tbe following list highlights the ellorts tlat have been made by our
development teairrm and the.Lion Square North Horoe Ownets Association to communicate our
plans for redevelopment with adjacent propertl owners'
EIFoRTS AT CO,IVIMUNTCATION WITH ADJACE"YT PROPERY O\Y]'|ERS
r Prior to the involvernent of the current development team, numerous meetings were held
between the Lion Square North HOA and owners of adjacent pro. perty,
. Upon the engagement of the current development team, an initlal meeting between' represcntatives of tlle Lions Square Nortb HOA, the dcvelopment tean and adjacent
l*p.tty owners was hdd.
. . Upon completion of the initial design submitteal to the Town of Vail Planning Staff for
review, the development tuim placed a call to tte president of the adjac€nt property's
HOA whereby the project was explained in detail and an olfer of fiirther communications
was made.
r Follou,ing tbe initial review of tlre project by the PEC, members of the development team
and (he Uon Sguare Lodge initiated a conferencb call with a designated cosrmittee
representing adjacent properry owners. Thc tlesign was dissussed in detail.
r hnmedjatdy after a revision to ttre plans was completed (6/2/05) and forwarded to the
Town of Vail Planning Staff, said revision was sent to represeutatives ofthe adjaceot
property owners. Said revision rellected a number of changes to the building suggested by
tle adjacent proPertY owners.
JUt{ 23 An6
ryN PF VAIL
0
VIELE DEVELOPMENT,'LLC
1000 S. FRoNTAGE RoAD Vfxsr, SUITE 202
VATLTCoLoRADo 81657
Telephone: (970) 4793082
Fax (97O) $6-3123
At the time of distribution of tle plans to the adjacent ProPerty owners, the development
team expressed an interest in disorssi.ng the plans with the adjacent ProPerty owners.
A conferencr call was conducted on 6 / 22 /06 wi$representatives from the developmeat
.team, the Lion Square HOA and adjacent property owners. The revisions to the plans
we.re discussed and explained.
RBvIsToNs To THE DEsIcN RELATED To CoMMUNICATIONS WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
Numerous design concepts were considered by t}lis development team and otliers prior to the
decision to move forward with the current design concept. It should be noted that one of the
primary reasons tle currmt model was sdected was tie limited impact t]e project had on the
adjacent property owners, as represented by thi substantial amount of density and heigk that will
The foliowing design modiffcations have been a result of communications witJr adjacent property
owners:
The entrance to the 6rst ievel of parking has been moved to under the West torver' This
&ange allows lor a landscaped separation between the proposed North tower and tfie
ailjacent property, which sits within 4 feet of the property line.
The llon Square North Buildlng curently extends onto an adjacrlnt property through au
easement. The portion of the buildnrg tlat curre.ndy exten& onto.the easement as wdl as
the portion of tie building tbat is curreutly in the setback will reloain in place with no
modi.tcation to tle sEr,rcture of the building otter thrn material applicahon to its erderior.
A sod anil lan&caped deck/terrace has been designed tlrat will cover the parking on the
ground level adjacent to t}e property Lir:e to the extent possible by surrent zoning'
The West tower was initially designed 10 feet olf the setback, or 20 feet from the property
line as a consequence of tlrc adjacent property's close proximity (within 4 feet) to the
property line,
The mechanical units,on the roof of the building have been covered by a mansard roof'
2 of3
'
I
I
I
VIELE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
1000 S. FRoMTAGE RoAD WEsr, SurrE 202
VRrr,,CoLoRADo 81657
Telephoner V10, 47 6-3082
Fax(vtor47Ut+23
Sumu.mv
The design.as proposed represents a .&action of wbat the current zoniag allows aad complies with
zoning aJ every level. The HOA of the Lion Square North and rlre devdopnent terun have been
mindfr:l of the impact tJris project will have on adjacerit property owaers .from the beginning of the
design. process and have ta.ken great efforts to preserve as much ofthe cuJrent charaster ofthe
neighborhood as the economics of tbis project allow, h addition, tbe dwelopment team and die
Lion Sguare North have been proactive in initiating a discourse with adjacent property owners and
have made nr:merous design dranges in an effort to Iimit tbe impact of ttre devdopment on adjacent
ProPerty ou'ners.
We'look forward to tle opporhnity to pres€nt this project to the Planniog and Eryironmerrtal
Commission. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best'Regards,
\----.- 17 / ,/_))j-t'&)/-
David Vicle
Manager
3 of3
YIELE DEVETOPMENT, LLC
1000 S. Fho}{rAcERoAD'msr, SrxrE 202
VArL, CoLoRADo 81657
Telephoue: (970) 4'1 63082
Fax(n\u631ts
Jme 15,2006
Bill Gibson, AICP
Planner tr '
Town of Vail Plaming $epartnent
?5 South Frontage Rd, West
Vail, Colorado 81657
RE: Iion Square Lodge - $onh: Eaploye Hoasitg
Dear Mr. Gibson:
Per our discussions witl]the Town of Vail Planning Sta.ff and with tbe Town of Vail FlousiDg
Departrnent regarding die Employee Housing Requirement for the redevelopment of tfie Lion
Square Lodge North building, we propose to provide an ofr-site solution to meet our employee
housing requirement. Orr int€rpretation of the employee bousing regulations for the Town of
Vail, speciffc to the Lionfhead Master Plan, is as followsr
EMPLOYEE GENERATION:
Multi Family Requiroment:
Mo&ffer = 15% as the pFoject complies wiih Zonlng
Employee Housiug Requirement for Condominium Uses: 3.6 * .15 = .54 Beds
.4 per unit
* 9 units
= 3.5 Employees Genemted
5-8per 1000SF
8/1000
,t 650 SF of Commerciel Space
= 5.2 Employees Generated
Modiffer = 157o as the ppoject complies with Zoning
Enployee Housing Reqr.iirernent for Retail Uses: 5.2Enployee Housing Reqr.iirernent for Retail Uses: 5.2 * .15 = .78 Beds
Aequirement: Proviite pne Eaployee Bed
Per the above calculatio'1c, we have determined that the dcvdopment, as proposed, will require an
employee housing unit {ith two beds. Wc propose to provide an off-iite qpe III or IV Employee
I
VIELE DEVELOPMENT, ILC
1000 S. FRoNTAGE RoAD WEsr, Surrt 202
YArL, CoroRADo 81557
Telephone: (97 0) 47 (-.3082
hxpm){t&312?
tleusi.g tlnit $'itli one bedroom, wit$h the town of Vail. The unit will be a miaimum of 700
sguare feet.
Please call with auy qucstims rclatcil to thir proposal.
Best Regards,
o-
EMPLOI'I{E}IT GENEfuTT]ON n"ATEI
an expansion, whictr would then bewill be.submined b| each lodging property requesting
evaluated on a case-py-case basis.
'(
h, y(,cf f-v4 liof
SuccpsrdpEr,cLovl{El{t Ctrrconss alo Rlr.tcas Fon V,lrr,
. ExXREssED As EMpLoy:EEs PER 1000 Squaxe Fligr
RRC RESEARCII
OVERAlJ.
AVEMGES
SUGGFJTED
RANGE
Bar/Restaurant 5.7/1000 s.f-5-8/1000 s.f.
Retail and Service Commercial 5.9/1000 5:8/1000
Retail: Grocery/LiquorfConvenience . 1.8/1000 1.5-3/1000
Office: Real Estate 7.611000 6-9l1000
Office: Financial 3.1./r000 2.5-411000
Office: Professional/Ofier 6:6/1000 ,5-8/1000
Conference Cgnter NA 1/1000
Health Club NA 1-1.s/1000
Lodging+1.3/room .25-1.25lroom
Local Goveriui,rent 5.5/1000 5-8/1000
Construction (Offices,nterior Storage, etc.)10.6i1000 9-13/1000
Multi-Family N/A 0.4/unit
Single Family N/A 0.2/unit
Other: To be determired through the SDD
process, upon submissibn of adequate
documentation and a rdview of the application
malDrials.
* lodging/accommod
upon factors such as
The standards prese
ions has particularly large vaiiation of employees per toom, depending
ize of facility and level of service/support facilities and amenities provided.
: a wide range of employment, but it is anticipated that a definitive repon
tf 'A 1 nr
4b
ME,Lrcr'Ass oc tArE s tNo
From:
CC:
Re:
MEMORANDUM
Project: 'Lion Squore todge - North BuildingDqle: April2l ,2006To: Bill Gibson - Town of Vqil
Town Plonner
Chip Melick - Melick Associotes
BillAnderson - Lion Squore Lodge
Plonning Deporimenl Review
The following list serves os o ilem by item response fo the preliminory
commenls from ihe plonning deporfment dofed April 13, 2006.
l. The setbock ond eosemenf oreos hove been cleorly morked on both the
orchileclurol hoor plons ond the civil site plons.
2. The oulside foce of the eosl woll line currently lies oufside of the requiredl0'-0' setbock. The only proposed consiruclion shown within the setbock
is o deck which proiec{s over the entronce odiocent to fhe refoil spoce
ond onofher deck locoted fo fhe eosf of the existing condo unit I ilO.
There is o prescriptive eosemenl for fhe current one slory porlion of
building thof lies within the north setbqck. The eosr rower will moinfoin
the some one slory footprint ol lhis oreo ond subsequent floorc will step
bock to be l0'-0" from the norlh border of the eosemenl. See fhe
ottoched documenfolion.
The porking requiremenl for the 650 s.f. reloil spoce bosed on section
l2-10-lO is 2.3 spoces per 1,000 s.f.. This wodld require 3 retoil porking
spoces which we hove provided on the surfoce porking lot (spoces
indicoted by on 'R').
Dovid Viele will contocl Town of Voil Housing Division to coordinole
complionce wifh fhe town employee housing requiramenis.
Pleose see the ottoched luminonce cqlculotions.
3.
4.
5.
6.
355 sOUTH TETI"ER STIEET
AtCHITECTUIE S,rErnEH O@SEtB\afy
rN T E r I Ot S LAXIWOOO CO 80226
P LA N N I N G TEL 303.53/a,tt3O
www.MELtcK.coM FAx 303. 53,a. r t3 |
o o
7. The roof height plon hos revised to include exisling ond proposed grodes
underneolh oll roof lines. Averoge moximum height colculolions ore
oftoched.
8. Elevolions which define the mechonicol equipmenf screening hqve been
odded to the exlerior elevolions sheet.
9. A moteriol somple boord ond colored renderings will be provided ot fie
presentofion.
10. A digitol model hos been creoled ond views from severol locoiions will
be ovoiloble of lhe presenlolion.
The following list serves os o ilem by item response fo the preliminory
commenfs from the public works depcrtmenl doted April 13, 2006.
l. See otfoched response letler from Peok Lond Consultonts.
2. See ottoched response letter from Peok Lond Consultonls.
3. See ottoched response letier from Peok Lqnd Consulionls.
4. See otfoched response letler from Peok Lond Consullonis.
5. See ofloched reponse letter from Peok lond Consultonts.
6. See sttoched response leilerfrom Peok Lond Consuhonls.
7. See oltoched responsE letlerfrom Peok Lond Consuhonls.
8. See otloched response lefier from Peok Lond Consultqnts.
9. We ore in the process of obtoining the Arrobelle lighting plon ond will
odd their lighting on our plons.
.O
10. The porking spoce configurotion hos been revised for improved occess.
Pleose see ottoched lower level porking plon.
I l.The printed copy of this drowing wos incorrecily scoled which resuhed in
the porking spoces oppeoring lo be smoller fhon the required width. This
hos been correcled ond o rypicolfullsize ond compocl spoce hos been
dimensioned. See otloched floor plon.
l2.The civil plon hos been updoted lo reflect the current porking loyout.
13. The surfoce porking plon hos been revised to provide beiter occess ond
the tuming rodius hos been shown for the spoces requested.
l4.A copy of fhe prescriptive encroochmenl eosement is included with this
memo.
l5.See ottqched response letler from Peok Lond Consulfonls.
l5,See offoched response letter from Peok Lond Consultonts.
17. The grode difference will be resolved with o sfone woll. Any portion of
the woll exceeding six feet will hove o four foot bench.
18. An eosem€nl from odiocent property owners is not requirej.
l9.Ihe troffic siudy will be updoted to reflect lhe mosl updoted plons.
20.The developmenl does not require o looding boy.
lf you hove ony questions obout ihese items or need ony'hing odditionol ot
this lime, pleose give us o coll:
Thonks.
o
TO:
ATTNI
PEAK LAND CONSULTANTS, INC.
PEAK LAND SURVEYING, INC
PEAK CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC
l(xx) LtoN's R]DGE LOOP, VAIL, CO 81657
PHONE 97M7G8644
F$(97$47&8610
MEMO
FROMT L. Ma*LuoaP'E.
JOB No.z 1257,1
DAIET 0il-20-06
RE: Liono Square North - Publlc Wort! Conmentr
Thc following addrcsscs the comnctts datd April 13,2(X)6 by the To*r of Vail Public Wo*s Oeparmnt
for tbe above refarcnced projoot. .
General Comrncnto
l. Enginocring Analysis of Stoppiog Sigbt Distmco: Peak is ourreirtly wo*ing with Tom Kassemol to
a*ernlne vrtat tte Town will distance tho Town will reguire leaving the south aoooss whore it is'
2,3. South Acccse crors*lopc & ridcualk gradc: A poesiblo solution to these is to regrade Lionshead
Circlo and loave the access wher€ it is. Peak is currentty q/orkhg with Tom l(6gsomcl qa thir irsuc
as it tiee into the stopping sigbt dishno€.
4. Show tbe installed and propose.d utilities from Arrabolle plans: Thc utilities will be shovm oo ths
plan
5, E' concrete pans: Peak will provide a letter that sbows a 4' pan will be adequato to handlo the 100-
y€ar evetrL
6, Driveway Crors-Slope: Once thc drivewny issuc has bceo rcsolvcd, t$e grades will be labelcd aDd
will be a naximum E%'
7 , East property grading and ArabeUe Gradiog: Peak wil veriry the Arrabelle gradbg is concct on
the plms.
8.t-aodscapingandSightDistarc€:once&esightg'irnSleghav€leelrdetermine'd6eywillbeshoum
on thc londscaping plm.
15. Public eotity utility casemc,nts: Once tho final location of the Holy Cross fansformer is
determined, an e8scm€fi cdll bc provided. No other public utilitiee are present
16. WaU Heigbts: Wall heights will be labeled-
Melick Associates, lnc
Chip Melick, Chris Cooper
PEAK LAND CONSULTANTS, INC.
PEAKLAND SURVEYING, INC
PEAK CMIL ENGINEERING, INClm uoN's RTDGE L@P, VAI- CO 616/
PHONE 97C4/6-Al,l
FN( 97t}{/e6t€
MEMO
70: Tovrn of Vail Pnblic \ brks
AfiV: Tom Kassrel, Tovrn Engineer
FROM. L. Mark Luna, P.E.
JOB No.| 1257.1
DATE: 06-20-06
Lionr Square North - 4' Pan J$tlftatlon
The Town req u irerrcnt for rulti-fanily cross pans is 8'. Vl/e are proposing he
installation ofa 4'crosspan wifi a 1" deph flowline.
Alpine Engineefing ha provided us wit fie drainage report; bofi $e soutt d rivamy
and uest drivarwy are part of tre safiE dminage basin. The 100-year flowathe loucst
end of tris basin is 0.4 cfs.
A su nnaly of fte resulb:
Fhw Dephs lorl' Pan 1" Deep
Looa$on Crors-Slopo Flow Depth
\Aftst Drivamy 4.8 % 0..08' (1)
Soutr Drivalay 8.00/6 0.07' (0.8")
The calculations fromhe above chart are 0n he athched sheeb. Tha pen capacity will
handle he .|o0-year flow.
We6t Rar||P
Workheot ftr T&ngubr C hannel
Pqiect File
VVat6tEct
Floiv ElerfEna
i/lettEd
Sdve Fs
V\ftstt)ti\rsy
TrlEngdr Ctand
MrrirE:8 Fqrnla
DbotEg6
Clldr|d Slope 0.0484n fr/fr
Dedh O.17 fi
|lfisi&SloF 12.qXXm H:V
RstrsideS@ laqe@-!j-Y-
Resdtg
Disdsg e 1.6E ca
Flo,r, At€g o35 tr
\ Hted P€rirnder 4.09 fl
Top t ldh .1.08 ft
Critld D€dh 0.6 ft
Cdlkd Slope 0.fl1.1876 fi/fr
V€holy 4.E4 ffs
VdodryHd 0.36 fr
Specific Ersgy 0.53 ft
Frude t'ltrrter 2.S
FloJv b sL?e|tl icd .
061200.
ll:lli35 Al,H.6rtrd l.thorL, bc. 37 Br€trld. Ro.d rrAi.tbury, CT 670t (2fi11 75&rc!t
Fb{I..rt v6.tt
PaeD I olt
[krrin$ Cdide,r oO13
Souh DriveaY
Workshesl br Trbrgubr C hannel
Prilcl Fil€ PUAD-1ffii125 7.l\tlofl llBlctlp'' ca|anu
l/lu|(ElEt Sdfh ffv€rvtY
R(rvElcnEnl Ttlr€dtChild
tt/l€thod itrrirEfs Filnt€
Solve F* Cturrrl Deilh
ClsrEl Slop€o(gxm ft/fl
|.€ft Slde sleo 24.(IID00 H : V
R(tt Sbslope 24.0qm H:V
Disehrge 0.lo cfs
D€ilh
Flo,Y AI€9
V!€tl€d P€rimeter
Top\ ldlh
critlcd Defih
Crithal slqe
Vdoaity
Velodil Heal
Spedfn Eugy
F qd6 l,lmF
Fl6,u b $ntuitcd.
0.12 tr3.34 fi334 fr0.11 fl
o.flF4ff] flrfi3.4 fi/3o18 fto25 fr
325
0420,06llll:2C Al.
Flow[..b, v5.16
P.g. I otl
Ma'Ii|€Bcodid€.i 0.013
H...hd ta.thod.. hc. !? Brcotd& Ro.d Wtbrb|'t, Cl0Ct06 (2o3) 7t&ll€t
T0m{0rIIAIL
Department of Public Work & Transportation
I 309 Elkhorn Drive
Vail, CO 8 1657
970-479-2 t 58
Fax: 970-479-2166
www.vailgov.com
MEMO
To:
CC:
From:
Re:
Date:
Bill Gibson
Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer
Lions Square Lodge North Redevelopment Plan PEC Review
5n6/06
The Town of Vail Public Works Department has reviewed the revised Lions Square Lodge North Plans dated
4124/06. The following comment shall be addressed prior to approval.
General Comments
l. Provide engineered analysis of site distance. The analysis must at minimum meet criteria set forth in
the AASHTO design guide. As discussed a performance alternative may be proposed.
2. Access grading shall be no more than 8% cross slope.
3. Concrete pans at entrances shall be 8' wide with 2" invert unless proven that a 4' pan with l" invert
can carry 100 yr flows.
4. Show sight distance triangle on landscape plan as well as on site plan. All landscaping shall comply
with sight distance triangle requirements.
5. Coordinate lighting plan with Anabelle Plan. Show Anabelle lighting on lighting plan.
6. Are First Floor level spaces 14-19 valet? Ifnot they must be accessible and not blocked.
7. Spaces 17,18,19 block acces to the dumpsters and mechanical room. Access must be maintained.
8. Please provide copy ofprescriptive encroachment easement.
9. Provide easement for any public utilities on private lot. (1.e. is the transformer on the NW comer for
Holy Cross?)
10. The traffic report dated 212l/06 indicates up to l2 additional condo units and 650 SF ofretail space
is proposed. Prior to final approval the traffic study shall be updated to reflect the most updated
plans and a traffic impact fee shall be assessed to each additional peak hour generated trip.
General Conditions of Approval
l. Please add the Town of Vail General Notes. (Notes can be e-mailed upon request)
2. Please add Utility Signature block and have all utilities sign acknowledging acceptance of utility design.
3. All construction staging issues shall be resolved prior to consffuction including staging, phasing, access,
schedules, traffic control, emergency access, etc...
4. A Public Way permit shall be obtained and approved by the Town of Vail prior to commencing any
construction within the Public Wav.
, r.,5. .A Town of vail Revocable Rf nermit shall be recorded for all nrivaToperfy improvements located
within Public waYs'
6. prior to approval of a Building permit all necessary permanent and tempoYrary easements are recorded
with Eagle County' .. .,- --:..- ^-r -*na'arin', nlan shall be submitted including;
7'PriortoapprovalofaBuildingpermitashoringandexcavationplanshallbesubmittedincludinl
excavation phasing, ""'gii."r"?
rr,"ri"g plans $ffihniofliil'uno ttott sections' cross sections and
, ;ff::1.l1ilTtrJ"."#:ilil:115'L9;J:"1;::Prr:g1"-1T.H:lf""J":il:''"0"':t"ffis'$H'
"
"plit"*iry
the appr.op-riut" o*tt T9 l3::.i recorded easement pnor
does not allow any #;;;;rhh trreir now. incl.dttg;;tl nails without approval and a permanent
tease and * rn ri.o#"ffi;;;;;. if thi; i;;;considered.contact bbot ari soon as possible'
9. A cDpHE permit, a copy of the sr:rmwater #;;"r;;prr"' *a all applicable AcoE permits (i'e'
t,nY*:tiii*lin:Xnlff iffi:lHHfi f ;"J-'orva'standardspriortobu'dingpermit
submittal.
TUHI{OFI/I{II
Deparlmenl of Public Worles & Transportation
I 309 Elkhorn Drive
Vail, CO 8 1657
970-479-2 158
Far: 970-479-2 166
www.vailgov.con
MEMO
To:
CC:
From:
Re:
Date:
Bill Gibson
Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer
Lions Square Lodge North Redevelopment Plan PEC Review
6l12106
The Town of Vail Public Works Department has reviewed the revised Lions Square Lodge North Plans dated
6/2106. The following general comments shall be addressed prior to approval.
General Comments
L As discussed, provide location, specifications and rendering ofproposed video/warning sight
distance devices. The development shall also agree to install, operate and maintain the approved
sight distance system.
2. The proposed modifications to the Lionshead Place vertical alignment are unreadable in the received
copy please provide clem copy.
3. Conciete pans at enffances shall be 8' wide with 2'invert unless proven thata4'pan with l" invert
or equivalent can catry 100 yr flows.
4. Show sight distance triangle on landscape plan as well as on site plan.All landscaping shall comPlY
with sight distance triangle requirements.
5. In ordei to obtain as much sight distance as possible can the electrical transformer be moved to the
North west comer of the site.
6. The valet configuration does not seem to function well. We suggest relocating valet spaces l7&21
to be perpendicular to and in front of space I 1. This would require noting space I I as valet. Also
move valet spaces 12,13,14,15,16 -7.5 feet to the east.
7 . Please note valet drop-off area. Is the space just north of the elevator a valet offrce?
8. There is a column placed in the ADA parking clear area on both parking levels, Does this meet
ADA requirements, I will defer to building for comment.g. The traffic report dated 2/21/06 indicates up to 12 additional condo units and 650 SF of retail space
is proposed. Prior to final approval the traffic study shall be updated to reflect the most updated
plans and a traffic impact fee shall be assessed to each additional peak hour generated trip.
General Conditions of Apnroval
I . Please add the Town of Vail General Notes. (Notes can be e-mailed upon request)
2. Please add Utility Signature block and have all utilities sign acknowledging acceptance of utility design.
''. :.. All construction staging issqahall be resolved prior to construction ]ding staging, phasing, access'
, schedules, traffic coirtril, "*Vg"n.y access, etc,..
+. R pubtic Way permit shall be obtained and approved by the Town of Vail prior to commencing any
construction within the Public Way.
5. A Town qf Vail Revocable ROW permit shall be recorded for all private Property improvements located
within public ways.
6. prior to approvaiof a Building permit all necessary permanent and temporary easements are recorded
with Eagle County
7. prior to approval of u nuitaing permit a shoring and excavation plan shall be submitted including;
excavation phasing, engineerfr-shoring plans with plan, profile and cross sections. Cross Sections and
plans shall include all existing conflicts (i.e' utilities)'
8. Any excavation shoring methids used that encroach upon adjacent public or privatg properbi shall have
approval by the appropriate owner and have a recorded easement prior to construction.
9. A CDPHE Permii, a copy of the stormwater management plan, and all applicable ACOE permits (i'e'
Dewatering) shall be submitted prior to construction.
10. provide full civil construction diawings meeting Town of Vail standards prior to building permit
submittal.