HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL POTATO PATCH FILING 1 BLOCK 2 LOT 6 (2)I .. .'., "-?J/, --. ', ')
414163 B-517 F-991
JOHNNETTE F'HILLIPgi
45 pc 1uF3
CLERK, CBL0RnDO
to 30 pl
use as
REC
15. AA
DOC
o.oo
, ..{. )
{,-\'*
ORDI NANCE #39(Series of 19B1)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING'ORDINANCE #30 OFI977; CHANGING THE MAXIMUM ALLOl'|ABLE DI^IELLING
UNITS ON LOT 6, BLOCK 2, POTATO PATCH, FROM A
MAXIMUM OF 30 UNITS TO A MAXIMUM OF 31 Dl4lELLING
UNITS; PROVIDING THAT ONE SUCH Dt,lELLING UNIT BE
RESTRICTED TO AN EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT; SETTING
THE STANDARDS GOVERNING SUCH EMPLOYEE HcJUSING
UN IT; SETT ING THE PERMI SSI BLE GROSS RESI DENTIAL
FL00R AREA ("GRFA") F0R SAID 31 UNITS; AND
PROVIDING DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO.
l{HEREAS, Ordinance #30 of I977 zoned Lot 6, Block 2' Potato
Patch to a maxjmum of 30 dwelling units; and
the al I owabl e number of un'i ts
restri cted to empl oyee housi ng
l.lHEREAS, the Planning and
}'lHEREAS, the current owner of the property wishes to amend
us 1 uni t whi ch woul d be
a caretaker faci I i tY; and
Envi ronmental Commi ssi on has recom-
mended unanimous approval of this amendment; and
l,lHEREAS, the Town Council considers it important to obtain
dwelling units restricted to employee housing; and
d
ri
tIHEREAS, the Town CounciI is of the opinion that this amendment
is in the interest of protecting the health, safety and welfare of
the inhabitants of the Town of Vail;
NO}J, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOl,lN COUNCIL OF THE TO!'lN
OF VAI L , COLORADO, THAT:
Sect i on 1 Exhibit A of 0rdinance #30, Series of I977 , fifth
paragraph from the top,'is hereby amended to read as follows:
Lot 6, Block 2, Potato Patch shall be zoned Medium DensityMulti-Family (MDMF) with a maximum of 31 units with one unitof the 31 which shall be restricted to employee housing
accordi ng to the fol Iowi ng restri cti ons :
1. That the Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) of the site
as determined by the Commun'i ty Development Department
under MDMF zone standards not be exceeded on the site.
That fifty percent of the required parking be enclosed
The archi tectural des i gn of the structure and the materi aland colors must be visually harmonious with the remainderof the site.
Access to the unit must not adversely affect the privacy
of adjacent structures.
The applicant shall agree in writing:
a. That the employee housing unit shall not be sold'
transferred'or- conveyed unit for a period of not'less than the'life oi Tr.ent l'lilliam Ruder' a lifein being, Plus twenty one (21) years fro-m date that
the Ceriificate.of 0ccupancy is issued for said unit
and
b.That the employee housing unit shall not be leased
or rented fbr iny period-of less than thirty (30)
consecutive days-, bnd that if it shal'l be rented ' it
shal I be rentei on'ly to tenants who are f u'l'l time
empl oyees i n the Upper Eag'l e Val l ey. - Ihe "Upper
Eabt e- Val l ey" sha'l i be deemed to incl ude the Gore
vailey, Miniurn, Red cl iff, Gilman, E9g_lg:vgjl ' and
Avon ind thei r surroundi ng areas ' A "ful l -time
employee" is a person who works an average of thirty
(30) hours per week; and
That the employee housing unit shal I not be divided
into any foi^m bt timeshares, interval ownership or
fractional fee, and
c.
d. That a dec'laration of covenants and restrictions shal
be filed of record in the 0ffjce of the Eagle County
Clerk and Recorder in a form approved by the Town
Attorney for the benefit of the Town to insure that
the resiri cti ons herei n shal I run wi th the I and '
Section 2.If any part, section, subsection' sentence, clause
or phrase of this ordjnance is for any reason held to be invalid, such
decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of
this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it wou'l d have
passed thi s ordi nance, and each part, secti on, subsecti on , sentence '
clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or m0re
partS, SectiOns, SubSeCtion, Sentences, Clauses or phraSes be deClared
inval id.
Section 3. The Town Counci I hereby finds, determines and declares
is necessary and proper for the health, safety and
of Vai I and the inhabitants thereof.
Section 4.The repea'l or the repeal and reenactment of any
provision of the Vail Municipal Code is provided in this ordinance
shal'l not affect any right which has accrued, d[Y duty imposed' any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, itrJ
prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as
commenced under or by virtue of the provis'i on repealed or repealed
c!
rlr?
lro
OJ
o
LL
ul$i
-tr
o6
r-
oo
Itr
F
n
I
cq
rq
'A$
{t
that this ordinance
welfare of the Town
-2-
ONCE IN FULL TH
THIS ORDINANCE
OF THE TOl^lN OF
1981.
and reenacted The repea'l of any provision hereby sha'l I not revive
any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded
un'l ess expressly stated herein.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
IS 20th DAY OF OCTOBER, 198I, AND A PUBLIC HEARING ON
SHALL BE HELD AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE TOt^lN COUNCIL
VAIL, COLORADO, ON THE 34/_ DAY OF - .
f
ATTEST:
INTRODUCED, READ APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBL I SHED IHIS -f,44_DAy 0F
ATT EST :
I
c.]
ui
4L4L63 B-517 tr-991 It/t7/Bg l4:48 trG 3 OF3
-3-
IJJo
J
olo
9
z
a
=FIDoA
': r ! a a.:tz = ='! -t 2 ? E t2a L tl e'
"t?nii,ii;€r; E i
=2;:22'!.2-lc-5: ; i ;:r a -. ;= E:E€;;;,i j i = j.=
'-- '?.i:*.'ii?i:E 2.. ..€ i€i;ii:! =i:: - x -€355:;
+zEEC.j-.,Fi iE; r:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.lal
.:-1
=-l(l+rlirtlo-l
ol+rlrol+rlol'lOIF\l
^l
€
Pt=
Fl@o
z
.U
+t
o'o
IAo&.
()
f
.rJ kl ^n!\urH
:1 t--f>xt-l '.' v
lzz:{<3rt
CEP2t-tuf,<i
Fsiq-i{r1 lrl 1.,-(.-fR:GYAd5s{%caS=oort ztL: l- i-
-!{<F:ioiIl{z!\>Qe9
-\rF3Er.r^a5trIX
,A -; \ r.,l
'..r- * O )B:FP:,-;vF39sdFxoto<xizu:fii=treSXS
r,', I-Y-
i53S
{-fF
-6f
F'
+ff{
+{
:tO.tl
trnP-IFa
.Fl+
t{t
-lf llra
Elr.rFrt
fH
€,
frfFFr
-ciFtLt|e
}F\alf-|F.ta:a+ttt}|rFl
"-HLrrfr\E
if{aqLr+
ArrFl
t+<,t-)
..Jtd-a
rF)rFthAr
IEilv
Lo
./,
o!
]
(,,
z
rOu f=,(u
318/e0
phone call from 770 condo President;
please notify him of any proposals for
77 0:
MR BORIS }IOMIROFF
770 POTATO PATCIT IIL4
vArL c0 81657
fte- >1)7
o
p*{[&,
April 27, 1982
Mr. Peter Patton
Town Planner
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage RoadVail, Colorado 81657
RE: 770 Potato Patch Drive
Dear Peter:
Re: your recent "red tag" of the above job and our subsequent
conversations, I am informing you by this letter that we arein the process of doing preliminary road work (etc.) at Potato
Patch and will conform strictly to the engineering plans sub-
mitted to and approved by the Design Review Board.
Thank you for your he1p.
Si ncerely,An nn/
Xlfu /J,-'7+qPx
/ /ohn Thomas
(/._Jt:rg
The above has been
the Department of
Deve'lopment and
received by
Conmunity
e conditions
P.O. 8ox 696, Vai , Colorado 81658 . 303/a76-0250 . Anolher exclusive resodr developmenl ol Vail Investments & Developmenl, Ltd.
lll(J
J
o
z
(J
<(
z
tn
o,
'= ? | a a ilE = a ':. -v , a = Z=c ! F.!. -
13; i.4 ai..,.zz..?;;i: E i: e;:: !
5 i : : ::
,i+':it;i r. :.= i=E c'- ::,:6?iE:272;.12
*ii?i.:. =E : X -Ei i s::
1-a = = -,
i i != !-*:
00
=l
=l
';
!
(J
F
@
z
(Y)
Id,
(u
+,
(UE
0)
U
kJ .tJ
^AtYo F-'-orH9t)::5
lzz:s<a,r-jx=6):, A :\2utt:<E
tsEou:
iE=|lJ \ --1*s=
{t4caS,"oor zl{ I- i-
-tr:<r-:iF<}Jcllf=z
?385L{F3E"rl!SFTXKJ,a * lr- -:dto>Bsil9
=<!Q
HFtX
+*oXAE=;;u=x3,.'l-Y*
FESE
i-eil-
-O.tsa{
rFffr
+4,
X.A.
FR
rnF-.i-a
IF
a.'"
ffl
-ffl-:a.Ua,trF+
rF.
--,,v
i-t+:(F+F{FILa|e
ap'FaaHF.
-t,tt<,
*lrrFaLfL*fn\.F,lv
rF.E
A.\trl
fr+'14,LI.fJt{-l
flJrFtt{A.F)\t
)z
chen and associates
CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS
SSiO.rt GrlxrooD lpnDact coloR^oo fiaot $!/eG-ra3l
,nonf[y
lt. Jotn ltrcrms
P.O. Box 696
Vail-, @ 81657
Dear Sir:
Jure 15, 1982
Subject: For:rdation b<carration Obserration
Proposed ltrlti-fardly DeveloFrent,
Loiu 6, Block 2, VaivPotato
Patctr, Vai1, @lorado
Job lto. 23,029A
-Jre subsoil onditions e:resed in the for:rdalion elrcavations for tlnits13, 14 ard 15 ut(fr0,j:ffi"bDrive, vail, 6lorado. Itb previously
condugled a soil ard fcn:rdaLion inrrestigaticrr at t|re subject site issr:edu'der or:r Job llc. 23,A29 dated Decsnber 3, 1981.
At the tine of our site wisrt, the o<carration had been ccrpleted to
proposed fourdaLion bearing elqrations. Cut depths mried frcm 4 feetto 14 feet belq^r tlre adjacent grade. Ttre bearilg elerzations step rp ilI to 6 fot inesrents parallelirrg the surface grade.
the subsoil onditions eposed in ttre open e>(cavation consistpredordrantly of sardy grravels w:Lt} oc.casional cobbles ard boulderssimilar to tlpse encountered. in or:r previous irvestigation. ltre erposedsoils stcutd be suitable for sup6nrE of the recennrlnded 2,500 psf Uea:lingpressure. SeveraL local areas of disturbed soils to a depttr of 4 to 5
i-nches rrcre ncted. Ioose or distr:rbei soi.ls stpul-d be eittrer curq:acteatc 1009 stardard P:.octor density or rsrpvred prior to tJle placenent ofccncrete. A11 pertinent design or construcllon recrcnnerdations crcntajnedir the original report shou-Id be observed..
l^Je renain available for additional observation and testirq at vourrequest. If any guestiors or if rlle can be of fr:rther service,
pr ease call
Very truly yours,
cllni AltD ASscTArEs, rNc.
IrUB/dc
Rev. By: S.L.P!c!: E1&rado DngineeringAttn: Ben Elnpre
Snovder tbpkins
OIf|CE3: CASPER . COtOnaDO SpntNGg . DENVER
As reqr:estpd, r.e rrisited t}re subjec,t site for tte purlnse of evatuating
. SAI,T LAXE CITY
PETER COSGRIFF
JOHN W. OUNN
ROBERT H. S. FRENCH
STEPH EN C. WEST
TIMOTHY H. BERRY
ARTHUR A. ABPLANALE .JR.
JOHN B.WOOO
FREDERICX E. S KILLERN
LAw OFFTcES
CoscRrrn DUNN & FnerucH, P C.
P. O. Box 34o
VarL,CoLoRAoo e1658
t303t 476-75s2
June 11 | L984
LEAOVILLE OFFICE:
P. O. AOX !l
LEAOVILLE, COLORADO AO4E,
(303) 446-lAas
BRECKENRIDGE OFFICE:
P. O. AOX 5AA
BRECKENRIOGE, COLORADO 8O444
(3 03) 453 -290 |
Mr. Gary MoranBuilding Inspector
Town of Vail75 S. Frontage Road WestVail, Colorado 81657
Re: 770 Potato Patch Drive
Dear Gary:
I enclose a copy of the report which I have
received from Tyree/Associates related to the HBF units at
770 Potato Patch Drive. I will appreciate being advised byyou of your position as to what steps must be taken before afinal Certificate of Occupancy will- be issued to HBF.
CertainJ-y, I would want to know if you have any contact from
Silverado in regard to Certificates of Occupancy for the HBFunits, which are unj-ts 3, 7 and 12.
Yours very truly,
JlilD:kem
Enc.
cc: Mr. Lundy (w/o enc.)Mr. BeLl (w/o enc. )
75 south frontage rosd
Yall, colotado 81657
(303) 47$'2138
(303) 479-2'139
Decenber 4, L989
S incerely,
A. Peter Patten Jr.Director of Cornrnunity Development
APPIpp
ofllce ol communlty develoPmenl
Mr. Abe StrapiroP.O. Box 1448Vai1, co 81658
Dear Abe:
upan researching the comnunity Developnent Departnent files, I've
dlterrnined that-our records indicate the following for 770 Potato
Patch:
No. of dwelling units allowed = 30 plus l- enployee unit'
No' of dwell'in! units existing = 16 plus 1 enproyee unit'
No. of dweJ.ling units allowed but unbuilt = 14
Sq. Ft. of GRFA allowed = 55,410
Sq. Ft. of GRFA existing = 32 'L94Sq. Ft. of GRFA allowed but unbui}E = 24,2!6
The community Development Department believes these to'be accurate
iig"i"r "" tiri" date. We reserve the right to confirrn the existing
,rrib.r of units and their square footage upon application for any
additional units.
I
t
p
\ATES
-J [e
Jl-!,t-9
-d.DING CODE CONSI'LTANTS
41524 EOUTH TWENTY FTRST STREET,- COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO 8O9I'4
PHONE (303) 535.3055
May 29, 1984
Mr. John DunnAttorney At LawP. O. Box 34OVail, Colorado 81658
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
INSPECTION CRITERIA:
OCCUPANCY CLASS IF ICATION :
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:
CODES IN FORCE:
UNIT 12
Field Inspection, May 16 & May 22, Igg4
770 Potato Patch DriveVail, Colorado
Per Vail Building Department
Group R, Division I
V-N
Assume 1979 Uniform Codes
iiv
Exterior:
1:. Front steps into entry vary in riser height from 512 inches to7J[ inches.
6rK z. There appears to be untreated rumber in direct contact iriththe soil.
0r 9. Exterior grade should be adjusted to drain surface \^rater awayfrom the building at the northeait corner of the front entry area.
-t*g€n .a: _ Exte-rior stucco application has been patched on the north-ab'sLde of the building. perimeter insuration is stitt visible.
Ak5: on th-e east and south sides of the building the exteriorU) stucco work has not been completed.
^,r-6. ..fhe first froor main deck has a double 2x6 (16,, on cenLer)
@\v cantilever spanning approximately 6 feet. Appears to beoverspanned. ,r E f_
? 7 . Fireprace frue is ,rot z'!..! J"". portion of the buildingSL within 1O feet. Secrion 912(a) of the ur-lE.---
ever on vtest end not \teathered in.
ie no insulation in exterior wall at storage room by
oFF Ylcu6 ra /C66f Ftur- F&zt"b'
O. Gap under first riser at entry.
J
}Vqt. Hole in built up roof on north side over entry.
.az
UEL2. We are unable to locate dryer vent termination outside.
Abt. We are unable to locate oven exhaust termination.
0(,r+. Flashing at weat end of top deck is not secure.
$l(t5. Door at upper deck needs flashing at botLom of the threshold.
ALL6. Brick walkway at front entry is loose and moves. Should bev- grouted to rnaintain stability.
Interi-or s
r-ll
?$vt1 L7. The northeast corner of the dining room aPpears to have- excessive defLection in the floor sheathing.
W 18. Overflow roof drain from upper deck deposits water to lower- deck.
Jlfl$*tg. Glass door from kitchen to exterior deck has not been proper-
'f'' ly identified as safety or laminated glass.
trafrq 20. Kitchen cabinete are only 16 inches above the stove cookingWc; surface. ( SO inches requiredl .
*a6! Zt. Handrails throughout the unittro proper height. (30":34").
6t 22. Door from upper deck swings over a landingI2 inch lorrer than the threshold of the door.
23. Exterior stucco at upper deck window is not
trave not been installed at the
which is more than
complete.
installed in
roofed with ahas not been donerecognized stan-
ulft
rt&'z+. Built-up roof does not appear to have beenv" accordance tiri th recognized standards.
rttlff8\(25. The flat roof section of the unit tras beenw'r single-ply membrane assernbly. The installationin an approved manner. Should be installed $tith
ag,
dards.
26. The skylight frame is missing scre$rs in various locations and
some are not tightened.
'27. water closet on first floor does not flush properly.0(
-2-
25.
7&a zs.
vffiL,' '' "o( s.
N'+.
o(4' s.
there is no closet flange.
6
0{; t3o-. -Duct- for thermador stove exhaust should be provided with arat.eo enclosure as per Section L9O2 of the UMC.
UNIT 7
Water cl-oset in lower bathroom does
Water closet in east lower bathroom
not flush.
still not installed and
pipes under stairs to second floorthe one-hour integrity.
exterior GFI outlet because sidinq is
water from
"{*
f,+o!
Exterior:
1. on west side of buirding under the deck there is a hore inthe wall that shoutd. be filled.
6.
7.
area
It appears that ungalvanized staples have been used to applyexterj.or siding, particularly on the southrdest corner.
Siding is cracked on the west side of the unit.
We are unable to locate the dryer vent to the outside.aptu{rfl g//E
We are unable to locate the oven exhaust to the outside.ri(, *,urps t oe
The fireplace flue is dented.
The parking rot is grade so Lhat drainage goes under the deckand not to culvert.
Interi-or:
S'9. _Handrair has not been provided on stairs to second froor,rPt- IeveI.
^Ul, ?:_. _!"lf:. in garage have not been anchorecl to foundation byo-{f6 anchor bolts. Need to confirm what was used to anchor thesl
4.trt6v walls.
,,r.},t f O. Penetration of jacuzzi
tY l' should be filled to maintain.ll
f\ry, 11. Unab1e to open cover onr 0( to tight against outlet.r\
t{*tr, Bottom.of patio door should be sealed to prevenrenterlng unl_t.r,*En
{Stj. skylight. grass in tiving room is cracked.
S,b 14. Kitchen cabinets are onry lg inches above stove cooking sur-tqS face. (30" required. )
-3-
0u
/15. Duct for thermador stove exhausL should be provided withrated enclosure as per Section L9O2 of the UMC.
16. Lo\.ter west bedroom appears to be short of natural ven-tilation. Only one operable window has been provided.
6\LfZn A hole under the stairway frorn the basement should be filled.
EO
6fft4. No ventilation has been providecl in underfloor area6.
\ 19. Glass in door from patio to upstairs bedroom tras not been. specified as tempered or safety glass.
dL 20. Doors from deck into upstairs bedroom and(Jnt lanaing more than I inch b-elow the threshold
lrl$&2I. Exterior deck carpeting not installed. in
t{Y" manner.
ru/ tW'ZZ. Single-ply membrane roof above tiving room poorly installed.Insufficient ballast has been provided.
roftfZg. No handrail at lower bedroom where there are t\.ro risers.
{fiUNIT 3
Exterior:
1.. Door from upper deck swings over a landing which is more than\b inch lower than the threshold of the door.
2. No roof jacks have been installed on plumbing ventspenetrating roof.
3. The single-ply mernbrane roof on theroof is not complete and is not installedspecifications.
4. Roofing on the flat portions of theconstructed. The built-up roof has usedrock ballast.
5. No flashing or counterflashing hasroof on the h/est side of the unit.
6. Floor drain in garage is missing a
Interior:
7. Broken plaster in ceiling of livingroom appears to be causedby walking on the roof.
g. No handrail has been provided to the upstairs bedroom fromIanding.
bath open over aof the door.
a good workmanlike
sloped portion of theto the manufacturer's
unit are not properly
a plastic membrane with a
been provided on sloped
cover.
-4-
9. Cleanout cover missing on cleanout in east lower bathroom.
10. T'lxe eaat bedroom stairs ?rave riser dimensions that vary from4 to 6 inches in height and handrail.
11. Water valve on the hot water heater is improperly installed.
tt
12. Insufficient ventilation in lower west bedroom only oneoperable windovt has been provided.
13. L,or^ter bath on west end does not have required 30 inch $tidthat lvater close!.
14. Electrical outlet plate missing in lower west bedroom.
15. Duct for thetmador stove exhaust should be provided with arated enclosure as per Section 1902 of the UMC.
To the best of our knowledge this reflects our findings in the fieldinspection conducted on the aforementioned dates and the actual con-ditione of the units. If any of these observationa appear to be outof order please let us know.
tfully,
David P. Tyree
Code Coneultant
DPT/RMC: cm
\\FJ A
,--': '\-j "
,u/.' --"*-- s*-=s-
€,e
+\,
-v
'Plan
vatv(
. cAdIruEr PREPARATION
the installation of the unil so that the gas shut-oft
re regulator are accessible from lheand
side, and 2 KO.O back (see Fig. 19).
Three power suppi-y'pigtaits" are proa/ided in "J" box -one
black one while, and one red. NOTE that the red wire rs
""ooeO. Do nol remove lhis cap as only the black- and
J'JIi". rnir". are used for the 120 volt circuils of the
:oral Blower (CV2536) is employed, incoming
tSlv wires should be connecled black lo black
io'white. Incoming ground wire should be con-
oreen colored hex head sctew located inside
'e-e wiring diagram Fig. 22 or 23' Leave circuit
)FF until-cooklop is connected.
so inside "J" box is a small black "capped" wire.
is only to be used for conneclion o{ CV2336
entilatbr (see Fig. 19). Otherwise, do nol remove
r Remote Blowei (Cvzgs6) is emploved' bling '11
while wire f rom the Remote Blower into the "J"
oh anv convenient K.O. and connect the black
6 "smitt' black wire in the "J" box. Connect the
e lrom the Remote Blower lo the white wire in
ox together wilh the while from the incoming
ppry.
counterlop. drive nails or screws through de-
'of ei "O" (see f ig 17 and 18) located in the end
)l the rough-in box and lighten lo pull slde
roainsl corf nlerlop taking care nol to damageollket around bottom lip of rough-in box."and gasket not shown.)
countertop is particle board construction or tile-wnicn prevdnts fastening through the de'
roles the unit can be fastened to the countertop
r nails or screws through holes "E" (see Fig'-1.7
ito the edge of the countertop, taking care not lo
oorcelain finish on rough-in box.
I
1
'alve ano gas pressure reg
ront of, cabinet. -fii6G'it has been Design Certified for installation\
)ountertop near adjaqenl walls and proiecting surfaces\
:onstructed of combustible material. The minimum
rorizonlal dislance(s) from the side and back edge of
)ooktop to adjacent vertical combustible walls extending
r minimum oi 30 inches above cooking sur{aces; left hand
;ide wall 5 inches; right hand side wall 5 inches; and q
nches from rear wall. I
i4inimum horizontal dislance from tront edge of counler
o f ront edge of appliance: 1 inch. Minimum horizontal dis-
ince beiween 'overheat cabinets to eilher side of
rppliance: 46 inches.
\4AXIMUM DEPTH OF CABINETS INSTALLED ABOVE
rHE COOKING SURFACE OF THE COOKTOP IS 13
NCHES. MAXIMUM DEPTH OF DRAWER UNDER UNIT
S 16 INCHES.
fhis appliance is equipped with an intermittent ignition
levice.
IOUNTERTOP OPENING - Size this opening to the
limensions indicated by the asterisks shown below (see
Fig. 17).
Droo in CV2236 Vent Intake (Fig. 1) and allach ducl and
malie electrical connections (see Fig. 19).
Powersupply, 12Ovolts, 1 Phase,60 Hz. connectstojunc'
tion box f'i"i'Uot locat6d al bottom right hand corner of
vent intake (CV2236) unit (see Fig. 19).
Knockouts are provided in "J" box for % tradesize conduit
l7s" diameler K.O.'s) - 2 K.O.'s at bottom, 2 K.O.'s at right
capPed. Do 1
while wlres
gas cooktop.
When lntegri
power suppl)
and white to
necled to grl
"J" box. See
breaker OFF
NOTE: Also i
This wire is
Remote Vent
cap. When Rt
black and wh
box through
wire to lhe ":
white wire lr
the "J" box
power suppr
To fasten co
pressed hole
f langes oi t
spacers aga
silicone gas
(Spacers ant
NOTE: lf cou
sudaced, w
pressed hol€
by driving n:
and 1 8) into '
damage por
0tscilnl0t CUI||UI ' FtG. 17 ..1
it', )/,/,/l
I = llilinlr 0islr.rt trolt Conb3rlill! illr |ldl l|
! = iliiift!|n 0islan.t froil C.trbuslibl! L!lt Sid! wrll l0 51i"
C = li.inu'n orslrnc! ttoir Conhllibl! 8ie$ Sid! Y.ll l. | 5h-U///,,'t
%,'MN.@
;.,,N*'-w
+f" MlN. 't
FLAT AREA
//', )ou /
4 u' 3"r| --.---) FRoM| '=4./ couru6,, ,/
ffi)l,",.W/./ffi,/'ffiNY/ './ .,
W' /"'"1u"'./,/'./ //
%" MIN-
FLAT AREA
.l
-4
box 100
Yail, colorado 81657(3031 476-s613
department of community development
July 19, L982
El Dorado Engineering Co.P.0. Box 669
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 RE: 770 Potato Patch
Attn:. Ben Elmore
Dear Sir:
Plans for the above project have been checked and may be picked
upon for corection at the Build'ing Department office, 75 South
Frontage Road, Vail.
Comnents and corrections are noted in red on the p1ans.
Please return two sets of corrected plans alons with the checked set.
Upon approval of pl ans 2 sets will be stamped approved, l for the job
and 1 for our fi] es.
If there are any questions regarding this p'l an check, please contactthe undersigned between 8 and 9 a.m. or 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. Monday thru
Fri day.
Si ncerely,
Chet Horton
Building Inspector
CH:df
ELDORADO ENGINEERING-MPANY
823 Blake Avenue BoxE69
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLO. 81607
(303) 94S8596
,no vNV ?at1tb ?XCA CoAoos+t{t,t-19
""..r-". {O o, L
"or"rr^r.o., ?& oerc Z'22'bZ
CXECKEO 8Y
riosrcri!+t i-#, tlt- ?d!., rh. 0t|l1.
E LDoRADo ,5[X'*:ff ' T{ru en trv
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLO. 8160I
(303) 945€596
JOB
sft€ET No.
CALCULATED SY
CHECKED BY OATE
OFL
oxe 2i!t'Dl
s6s;p N aNE
mEraai 6)rq G|ra4 rb, 0lrll.
,1;/'
Sincere'ly,
,<r^-
(ooto
@
,i,tIc)o
O\.E93EEco-tov)251d
O(Jga;fi9FAF
t^ al-frt o(rO\oo6i=uJz2s6oz\.lll oD23E5:)oozoao-
-.{
=ulE?
=ul6=2dER
tr@z6z
UJoo
EooJ
uJ
0ctober 15,'1982
Town of Vail
P.0. Box 100Vall, C0 81657
ATTN: Chet Horton
RE: 770 Potato Patch
Dear Chet:
Enclosed ane our calculations for the balconies
calculations for the caretaker un'lt. l.|e do not
with either one.
Please cal'l if you have any questions.
Ben Elmore, EIT
BE|Jlw
Reviewed by: ,rRH
of the D unitsfeel there is and wind
any problem
OFFICES:'GLENWOOD SPRINGS ' RIFLE ' DURANGO
rnA vELDoRADo:[1]::I'TGflnnnv .,..,..o r ^ or !
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLO. 81601 cALcuLArEo ., BdE o^IE lo 4-b2
(303) 945-8596
CHECKEO BY
l.la FJ E
:
ntlrrJa ?a zlA J C-461,.L n N]T eA'-Ez'fA (Pl 1
L"?lor.IAF 1t,\t- ot 4z tlJ 6r{f.oZ 1+a.a-,z ta:]g-z oF a JTAvFt o J'
-:
li
:
$,n ,{Rfi
3IEI !i2 l:,.^
eb t,o It l-"*
\)-et.'c-r
-l e..!,{,:l/1 n :{
i\.I
a n,r1 J,-
I ?.pli Se vo \.3r:p.-T\-
//\\h";9F tp..t*et !r-
//\\
'l)/\r'
Norc A LLC FA T€ZlaR /3 La\'&6;1>w.,k looP
ntaa rDE
4-l-4
'tv
;ID rt' 'lc
VD (lro it42'4 00
F.t e.-Yr.^oot v.l't UtL L
l^JoC!-1 I l.la;.!",rl
t a4
F 4
AJA.I . Drl 1*{'Wt tJ
6
1)-nE Ar!!ulu
4V
Pi0q.n ?!al / \-iEs.'rlt . ldF iaE olall.
75 soulh lronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000 ottlce of communlly develoPment
February I , .l984
Duddy-Vie'l e ConstruCtion
Box 331Vail, Colorado 81657
Gentl emen,
I would like to remind you that your ternporary certificate of
occupancy on 77A Potato Patch expires as of this date.
Please make arrangements to ca'l I this office fof,a final inspection.
The temporary certificate of occupancy was issued on December 8, 'l 983,
stating that a vacuum brakers are needed on the hose bibs. Also'
a pocket door is needed on the bathroom downstairs, and the hot tub is
not in.
We would appreciate your inrnediate attention to this matter.
Building Inspector
GM/rme
lnun
box l(Xl
Yail, colorado 81657
l:rr3l 476€613
department of community development
TO: Silverado Savings and Loan
FROM: Steve Patterson, Town of Vail Chief Building Official
DATE: June 28, 1982
RE: Perrnit Issuance for 77O Potato Patch
Gent L enen :
The building pefltrits wilL be issued in each phase of construction at
770 Potato Patch in accordance with Town of Vail ordinances andregulations concerning construction and zoning when they are
requested and approved. The first phase (17 units) have only to bepaid for at this tiure and perrnits would then be issued.
- *** rnn,nrrr,r*t,,PANY
823 Blake Avenue Box 669
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLO. 81601
(303) 9.5€506
CHECKED BY
,oa I
gHEET NO,
CALCULATEO BY DATE
t(,er l i11
.\
l./'\trN ts\T rx e tT-
o
chen and associates
CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGI NEERS
lato. tta orlxuooo t ttxot coloiaDorr@t !t/r.&7a5a
AnqrJst 26, L982
s'bject: ffi3ffi*ffiffi*ffi
Obsenration, Pro;nsed D4>le><,
Units'5 ard 6,' Multi-Fanily' Der/elogrentl I-oL'6, Block 2,
Vail'&otato Patch, Vail,. Colorado.
Jd No. 23,O2gA
Mr. John Tbnas
P.O. Bo< 696
VaiL, @ 81557
Dear !,1r. Itsms:
As rcqr:ested, r,e nnde serreral site visiLs during tlre period of
Augr.st J.l to Ar$rst 23, L982 to errafi:ate site drainage ard general
subqrade qdiEiss for foundaticn $ryFort. !'ile praliotlsly stducted asoil ard fcnmdaticsl inrrestigation at the subject site reported uder o:r
Job I.b. 231029 dated Decelnber 3, 1981.
the sr.rbject dusrlex is located in te area previo:sly identified as
shallo,,l ground wat-er ard reqLliring sr:bsurface drainage to allcn for
develoEnent. Dring cur August LL, L2 and 16 site visits, drainage
alter.rra._tives ard reccrnrendaLions were discr:ssed. Gr Argu.st 12, ue net
with repnesentatives of the arctritect, engineer, crrner arvf ocavatorat ttrc site. l,le agreed tlrat constnrction of deep intercept draixs
as reccnnerded jr qr ciginal- report hautd be an effectirc 1og tern
reans of lcnarcring qround urater level. Hc[,rever, due to the proxirnity
of existing viater and sover rnains ard building Units 1 through 4 to
tlre poposed str:rrtrre, onstructiqt of deep drains does not appearfeasi-ble. The buifdinq wiff be nu/ed slightly do,vnslope ard aray fr.crn
$te utility eassent to Fro\ride addieional area for the tnrilding erccavation
and redr:ce the risk of urdenni:rirg the adjacent water and serner mains.
V*e reccnnrended tJrat a sr:bdrain be constnrcE€d along the entire Whillside of t}re excawation to htercept growd water seepage and preverrt
wetting of adjacent lorer lenrels. Since tlre drairr will be constructedfolloriag er<calntior, cqrsiderable pr.oblens with ds,,atering ard subgradestabilization stpuld be opected. the grarrel bacidill strould be placed
to wittrin abctrt 2 feet of tlre grcud surface. ltre bottcrn of the drain
stpuld elcterd appro<inately 2 feet belcw the lcnest adjacent flmr slab
or crer,fl space grade ard be a di-stancE laterally away frun the edge of
the footirg equaf to or greater t}an tlre depth belor the bottcttt of t}te
l
tlti
OFRCET: CAatEn o COLOnAOO lPnt OS . DENvEn . SALT LAXE CtTv
i,lr. Johr thcrnas
Aigust 26, L982
Page 2
fmting. PlacsrEnt of interior lateral trendl drains,r.rtrich sossfotirq lires at a relatively petperAncufar angl-e will probably a]ca
be required to der^rater tlre rgnainder of the er<ca\raLiqt. hterj-ordrains should be kept. asi rtarrcr,.r as praotsLcal to reduoe dish:rlcance ofadjacent bearirq so+s.
DJrinq. the LiJrE of o.tr Aug\tst 18 ttuqrgh 23 site visits, er<carraticnto fmti-rry ifade, placerent of sr:bdrains ard stabilizatiqr of softsub$ade areas v.las perforned. Ort dept}rs belqr,r t}re adjacent grornd
surface to footing grade ranged fnn 9 to 10 feet along tlre rprttr sj-deof tte occavation and to about 3 feet alcrg ttre south sj-de. An e.r^iticural
4 foot deprth of topsoil ard soft clayery sard was rsrpved frqn the eeqtand sotrtlrcast portiors of Unit 5. eu.stred r"ock, about 3 to 5 ilctldiareter, was placed ard ccnpacted within this area arul otber strallcw
subexcavated arees to stabilize and elsrate tne subgrade to for:rdatiqrlevel. I'finus l- jrntr size qushed rocJ< was tfren used to €p tlre J-argerrcd<. Ihe final surfaae was vjbrated witi a cqpactor. Ite nattrral soils
e<posed witiin the ranaining o<carratiqr and wittdn portj.ons of tJre
o<cavaticn obsewed pnior to ral< placerent onsisted of sitty to clayery
sandlz gravels with occasimal c&bles arul snall bor:fders. The naturalgranular soils ard crushed rock cbserrred aL footing grade strcnrtd besuitabl-e for the recomerded 21500 psf allcnable bearing pressure.
. Other resnrendaUiors preserrted in tln origirnl retrprt rrrtrich are
applicabJ.e strldd also be cbsenred.
If }rou have any questicns or if rte can be of firrtler senrice,
Very tnrly yours,
GItsi AND ASSMATES, INC.
please
SAD/dc
Rev. By: S.L.P.cc: eaig Snoden
Ben ElnDre
6Y..ij:Z
#p;*tt'tffi3 15222 .3!- ^a
l&*,,^',,,$fti'ii"ii'ds
q chen and associates
CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS
l0sio. rta o|-lruooo ttitraot.coloiaDo arto, st/t 5_7.51
D'".-',t-frr-"r,r*.l' ' ""iii
,' sEP 2 nlz ll
Subject: Fourdaticn D<cavaLior
Cbsenratiqr, Hrolrcsed MrlLi-Far[ly Oevelogrent , IclE 6,
BIoc* 2, vaiL/Fotato patrh,
Vail, Colorado.
Job No. 23,029A
I't. Jolnr ftcrnas
P.O. Bo< 695Vail, 6 81657
Dear Sir:
As requested, r,ure &senred tte o<cavalion for nrildinq unit 25A ada caretalcer ltrrit at the s:bject site on Au$:st 30, 1992 ti eratuate trresubsurfae cqrditicns exposed for fondatiqr swport. vfie preyiouslycdtducted a soil ard fondatior iwestigaLicnr aCtrre sr:bjeit, site rEportedunder our J& I\b. 23,029 dated Decsnber 3, l9gl.
At tl|e Lfurc of otrr site visit, erccarratisr for the prr:posed uritswas essenLially orplete. c'ut depths ranged fisn g to g teet uercrn'adjacent qrcnnd surface at t}le upfriff side arui 3 to I feet at tlle dcrml|.illside of the excarraulon. a naximln ctrt depth of about rr feet was cbsewed
iJl ttte central ponticur of tlre er<carration Ltrere t}ere was a 2 fot stepdcnm.rn the soutlreast oorngr, wtrere cut deg$rs ranged 7 T/2 rD r0 feet wefsubsoirs were observed. ltre qrtract6r had aiparently stabilized thisarea w:ittr about 5 b 12 inches of 3 to 6 furch-arushed-rock. rhe coaiserod< was caFped with 3rl4 irntr crrushed rock. Dauateing of the o<cavationwas appa:entIy not perfomed and free grourd water was about 6 to 12j.trdles belq,r fmtirg el-evation iJr the south{est @rner. A strean located4 to 5 feet a'qt of ttre ercatration rvas pnobably contributing to ttregE otlnd wa@r onditiqts in tl"is area. The rsnairder of the e<carraLiqrwas relatirrery dI:/ witll only an occasionar minor wet area ssenred..
ryr?ad footings 24 tD 36 i-nctres wide were befuq fo*ned dr:rjng o:ryisit.
Ttg.:9if" o<posed at ttre bottcrn of tlre e><cavatior, eccl*ting ttregravel fill, wrsisted of siler to clay€V sads and gravels, witi o"UUfesand oc€asidtat snall banldens. ttpse soils are sirnilar to ttpse errcurteredin our prariors investigati.ur ard inclr$.jng the rock fiLl strould be suitable
August 3I, 1982
OFRCET: CAtPCn . COLOnADO tpnt}|o!' . OEtaVEn o SALI ! XECtTv
for sqport of t}le reccnnelded 21500 psf bearirg pressr:re.
fhe sdrject e:<carratiqr is laated in tne area prerrior:sly identlfiedas haviry shal-Lcra' grourd rdater requirirg subsurface drainage to allcn fordeveJogrent. 'Ihe ct:rrelrt grcnmd water leveI should be o<pected to rise durfuqseascmal rr.noff. I{e reccnnend an rmderdrain systsn be bstalled toprotect tlle lorcr revels of tjre buildi:rgs fron wettirq. other appricabtedFsis" ard cqrstnrcEicm recsnnendatims presented in or:r original- reportshonld also be obcen/ed.
If lDu harre any questions or if rre can be of fr:rtlrer senrice,please ca]1.
't'ir. lotrn thcrnas
Auqust 31, 1982
Page 2
Rev. B1z: S.L.P.cc; Srsrden & HcpkinsAttn: Gaig Snorden
Eldorado EqineeringAttn: Ben Elmne
Very truly yarrs,
CHEN AI\ID ASSGUIIES, Il.lC.ffi3;!1-Bffilt*"'";d$r! 1s222 i:l^ ^ a
futt',,,$
chen and associates
CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS
$f. nO. 15/a OLENWOOD SPRI|{GS.COLORAOO !1!t't 30tga3.?i158
Jrne 2I, 1982
Subject: For:rdation DccavaLion Observatior,
Proposed larlti-fanf Iy DenreIotrxrent,Iot 6, Block 2, Vaivlr>tato
Patch, Vail, Colorado
.Iob No. 23,O29A
I\4r. John Thdnas
P.O. Bcx 695vall, @ 81657
Dear Si::: .,
As reguested, we observ-ed the foundation occavations for Building UnitsI0, 11 and 12 at the subject site on Jr:rre 21, 1982 to deternrine the general
subgrade conditions for foundation suplnrt. lde previously conducted a
soil and fourdation investigaLion at the subject site reported under our
Job Nc. 23,029 dated Decsrrber 3, 198I. Ad<tiLiona1ly, we ;:erforned a
preli:ninarl' soil and for:ndation irrvestigation f-or tlds site and the
adjacent Tcl; 34 of Block I, repoz'ted under cul Job No. 14,059 dated
January IO, L977.
At t}re Line of orr site visit, the e)<cavation had been cut irrto the
southerly facing, noCerately steep sloping tr:illside. Cut depths belotl grourd
surface varied fr.om an approxirate ndnimun of 3 feet at the south edgeof the excavation to a rnaximtm of about 15 feet at tlte north edge. The
bearinq elevations st-ep tp at several locations and are generally less
than 4 foot jn height w'ith a ma:<irinnn step of about 7 foot. Relatively
rninor gror.:rrd water seepage was cbserved within the deeS:er cut porEions of
the e{-ca\E--ion. As previously recrncrended, a forrrdation drain systern
slrould be ilstaLled to der,v:ater ttre excavation and protect all trele: grad:
levels of the trrilding fr.cm wetting. tlee urrderdrain shcuJ.d oonsist of a
perforated drain pipe, insta[ed in a gravel fifled trenctr placed at leastI foot belcnrr ]orpest adjacent grade a:d sloped on a rtinjrmm Ie; grade to
suitable gravity outlet. Ttre gravel beneattr tlre floor sl-abs should be
corurected to the underdrain systsn.
The soils o'posed at foundaLion level irl the occavation consist
\
a
'/ - ,8.
Jr:ne
Page
Jol'n Thonas
2L, L982
2
Any loose or disturbed soils at fou-rdalion bearing lerrel should beeither ocnpa.cted to 100? standard proctor density or renoved prior toconqrete placarent. Applicable design and construction reccnrendationspresented in the original report should be obsenred.
I{e will be avai'lable for additionar obsenration ard tesLirg at yourreguest. If you have any questions or if roe can be of further ser',r-ice,please call.
Very truly lpurs,
cr{EN AND ASSrcIATES, INC.
S/rDldc
Rev. $z: S.L.P.oc: Eldorado ErgineeringAttn: Ben ELrDre
Snc&'den llcpkins
NOWDON AND HOPKI
ARCHITECTS
201 Gore Creek Drive
vArL, coLoRADO 81657
WE ARE SENDING YOU XAttacneA tr Under separate cov€r via
LETTil@F TRANSNNITTAL
TO
the following items:
O Samples ! Spociticationstr Shop drawings
Y Copy of letter
tr Prints
E Change order
tr
tr
----vfl]F7 l*'"" fi1t'/AnENtlon' '/zntt ///ttwnn
FE:(
-/ifl /'#ft, 4ou"lfuo tlrU
i,ll,,i'h / -4
coPtEs OATE NO.DESCRIPTION
/il I t6 ifi?a //rA4 1 //q/N// {fi/i r,?//e,f - tlN+trt /'4
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked belw:
E For approval
!( For your use
( As requested
tr Apprcved as submitted
O Approved as noted
D Returned fror corr€ctions
E Resubmit-copies for apprwal
tr Submit-copies for distribution
E Retum
-corrected
prints
El For reviaw and commcnt tr
tr FOR BIDS DUE 19- tr PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
Pioflf,l2a+2 @/tr" sd., h, orrl.la .Ddo4ttat rrr aot ., nod:td, klndt, n&lrtt ua at onca.
q chen and associates
CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS
$a to. $a oLlrfooo ltn|xcl,coloeloo tttor l0N/9.] tasr
JuIy 15, 1982
Subject: Fourdation Ercarration Observation,
Proposed l.tulti-Family DEvelofrent,
I-oL 6, Block 2, VaivPotato
Patch, VaiI, Colorada
Job tto. 23,029A
1,1r. .john ltpnas I
P.O. Box 696Vail, O 81657
Dear l,tr. ItEmas
Centlqen:
As rrequested, r,e obseled tlre o'cavation for Rrilding urits 1
through 4 at the subjecE. site on July 2 ard July 6' 1982 to evaluate the
srJbsoil onditions eposed for fcundatiqr suporE. I€ p!:eviol-lsly ondwted
a soil- ard for:rdation invesLigaLion at tlre subject site relnrted
rrder our Job lib. 23,029 dated Decsrber 3, 1981.
At tlxe tjrre of or:r initial site visit, tJre ontrastor had @an
exca','ation in the rnrttreast corrrer of Unit 4 ard noved to the rprthwest
@rner of t}'rit I after encourtering slnllo,r gr:or:nd water conditicns in
t}at area. Ttre excarration at Unit 4 was about 6'feet deep and aboutl0 feet x 20 feet in dinension. Clayqrr sands and gravels r^ere erqnsedin the e<cavation belorp about 3 feet of topsoil ard free g:rourd lrater
1evel '"as obsenred at about deptfr 4 feet belovu tlre surrourrding gr:ound
s.rrjace. In tle rprth/Est @rrrer of Unit 1, an atr4rroxirnate 25 feetx 35 feet ercca',ation had been cut. Cut depths ranged fircrn 7 l/2 tD I0
feet in the rprttern uphill area to 3 to 4 feet at the lqoer southern
e':C of ttre t.rdt. tlo fnee hrater was observed and the soils e<posed
!p-re a silty sarui ard gravel. TLre csrtrastor ras advised to install
t:errCres or drains for trnrnranent devraterilg of the site as neecied.
Depth of drains r,,as suggested at 2 feet belon sxca'ralion level andat least 2 feet qtside of footing areas.
At ttle tine of qr site visit on July 6, tlre rrestern tuo t}'irds of
the erccavauion for ttnits I through 4 had been oopl-eted. Ort depths
OFFrcEs: CA3PER . COIONADO SPRIXG3 . OEIIVER . STLT LAXE CITY
o
I4r. John Thqrns
July 15, lttt
Page 2
ranged frqn 7 L/2 tD 11 feet at the northern r-phi}I side and frsn 2 U2to 5 L/2 feet at tte lover dorruntrill side. A stepdoln of I to 2 feet r,ras
obsenred jn the central portion of the brildings fo[ot,rring tle rntural
slope dorarrlr-ill. Ftee gror:rd v.rater seepage r,eias obsetr\/ed jl the north
c€ntra1 portion of tle e><cavation against the phill cut at
approxj.nately 8 to l0 feet belcn tlre growd swface. At the nortlrcast
@rner of Unit 4, free grornd vrater !€s still observed at about a 4 fot
depttr. A de\^rat€ring drain systen hErd alTr:rerrtly not beerr j.nstal-led.
The contractor vlas advised ttnt a penranent drajn qgstem r^ould be neededto protecL all belcn gacade levets of tlie building f:un r,'etting. Interior
laterals nray b required to drain belcrr flcor areas and stprten the drainrIo.v path. Ttre trendres slpuld be sloped to draj.n to a gravity outleL
and grarrel beneath the floor slabs shoul-d be cqrrected to tlre u'rderdrain
qrsten.
soils eposed at for.rdation level jrr ttre o<carrations onsisted
predcrnhantty of silty to clayey sands ard gtrarrcIs, cobbles and ecasiornlgnall bulders, similar to tbcse encountered in our prerrious investlgaticn.
ltese soiLs are suitabLe for st4ryort of tle reccr(Erded 2,500 psf bearing
paessure. IlriJsrrer, due to tlre presence of seepage, re reccnnend filal
obserration of tle s<cavation follcming der^atering. I-mse or disturbedsoils below tlre footilgs should be rsrorred prior to @tcete placenent.
Soft areas stnutd be renpved and replaced w'iti a structural fill ccrrpactedto at least 100E standard Proctor density. A thin layer of washed rocl<
can be r:sed at tlE bottcfir of trenches to facilitate drairage and cqrcreteplacenent. Applicable designr ard crcnstnrction recremendations presentedjn our origilal report should also be obsenred.
I{e vdll be available for :rlditional obsenraticn arul testirg at lpurrequest. If you:have any questions or if ue can be of fi:rther senrice,
please cal1.
Very truly yours,
GiEN N{D ASSOCT.FffES, rNC.
DAY/dc
Rev. B1z: S.FIE$cc: Caig Snowderr
ffir\.if$,i. 1s222 !,
@
Ben Elnore
chen and associates
CONSULTING GEOTECHNIGAL ENGINEERS
tolto,rta olEltooo tt xct ocoiloo ataot live.tr.sa
July 20' 1982
Sr:bject: For.rrdation Dcaration Obsenration,
koposed ltrlti-fardly De\reloFlEnt'
Io,t 6, Block 2, VailAotato
Patch, vail, olorado
Job No. 23'029A
It. John Ttlsnas
P.O. Eox 696v'ail, @ 81657
Gentlsten:
As requested ty R.D. Ocanrford, r.'e obsenrcd ttre er<cavaticn for
Brildtrg UELts 1 through 4 at tfe subject site on July 15' 1982 to
evaluate sr:bsr:rface orditions oposed in tbe er<carraticn for foundation
stmorE. lie proriosly ordrrted a soil ard fourdation imrestigation at
ttre sr:bject site reported r:nder our Job llo. 231029 dated Decsrber 3,
l98t ard r"eported prenriors obsenratims of tle ercavation for Hrildingtldts 1 th::ouqh 4 jn a letter dated July 15, 1982.
At t}re tirre of the qur-ent site visit, tlre o<carration for Buil4ilgttrits 1 tlrrouqh 4 bad beer ccnpleted. lbudations for Llnits I and 2 had beAn
ccnstructed and tlre contJiaettr had beqrn fonning the foudations for
tldts 3 and 4. c\rt depths for tlnits 3 ard 4 ranged tucllt 6 to 7 feet jn
tlre rprthern Wfrill side, 3 to 5 feet jn the dolvnslope porfim of tte
e:<canation. A stetrdorvn f:rcnr I tD I L/2 feet was observed jn tte sout}rern
U4 o'.,- tlre occavation. $srporarT lateral ard e*terior drair trenches
haC apparently been instalted to der^,ater the area of UrLits 3 and 4 in the I
easterrl portion of t}re excaration. Scrne water flovr r^ras ncted at ttp 2 drain
exits dcl^rnhilI frqn tte c€ntral and southeast areas of the units. lte
:nalority of the excavalion v,as cwered with 3/4 inch crusted rock. Average
depth of the rock les about 5 to 12 inches w"ith a naxint'Jn depth of about
24 jnches rsithin ttre eastern portion of Ixrit 4. Itre crusted roclt apparently
r:sed to irte:cept g::orndtater seepagert€s outletted to tt{c drairr trenches
frcnr the southern excarraticn perineter. The creel< Iocated about 6 to 8
feet east of Unit 4 sLill had a npderate flcntr.
the natural soils observed in tlre er<cavation rrrere essentially tJe
sarrE as previously reported although ttey r"ere nasked in npst areas due
to the eushed rod<. !4inor seepage was observed ir Whill portiots
of tlre excavation about 1 to 2 feet above t}le bott€rn of t}te er<ca',ration.
SerrcraL soft r,et areas r€re observed ard free rrater levef was found
to be withj-n about 6 irntres of footing elerration at serreral locations.
oFflcES: caStEn o coloi^oo sPnNos o DELy€R r saLT llrE clTy
1, I't. John Thsnas' Juty 20, L982
Paqe 2
Ttre subsoil orditions developed in the o<carntion are solEtrhat
rrariable but stpuld generally $ryFort tJre 2,500 psf reonrerded bearing
pressure. Iocalized higher settlerEnt potential- slDuld be opecbed.
Ihe contractor r,as advised to additicnally rorcnre aU soft areas ard
pLace 3/4 inch cn:shed rock. Dewaterilg of ttre e>(cavaticn has generally
r|ct been jn acordanoe with previous correspcndence . A pennanent
r-rrderdrain system stroufd be jnstalled at least 2 feet belont lolvest
adjacent finished grade and sloped to gravity outlet.
, the close proxirnity of 'tlre existing creek to tlte stnrctr:re IIBy b
contrjJcuting to the ground\€ter pr.oblans jn t}le area. @rsideraticn
should be given to eittrer J-ininq of the ditch or use of a culvert-
Applicable desigrr ard construction recqnrerrdations lxesented jn our
original report and subseqrrcnt letters stpuJ-d also be obsenrcd.
$Ie witl be arrailable for additional obsenration ard testing at )'ourreguest. If yctr have any questions or if r*e can be of firther service,
please ca1l.
Very truly yours,
CIIEN A}ID A,gSOCI{IBS, I}iC.
DAY/dc
cc: Snowden & IbpkinsAttn: fraig $roriCsl
Eldorado ErgineeringAttn: Ben ELprre
Crawford EKca\rati:lg
P.O. bx 2003vail, @ 81657
fr Y*l4d
ft-Ii;5;;;;:o<l*r61a:' "oli
tr: 15222 .3
?<r "c3
:#:or,^,'rr.-kai'[r'l
chen and associates
CONSULTING GEOTECH NICAL ENGINEERS
lu to. tta ol[xuooo ttitxot.coloiat)o ataot !o!,/ta!.ta5a
August 2, L982
Subject: Foundation E<caraticu:
Obsenraciqr, Proposed l,lu,lti-fanily Developrent, LoE 6,
Blod< 2, vaivPotato Patclr,vail, colorado
Job No. 23,029A
I'8. John $gnas
P.O. Box 695vail, @ 81657
Dear Sir:
a.s requested, rre observed ttre er<cayation for Buildilg Units 7, 8
and 9 at the sulcjecE, si@ qr July 26, 1982 to e\raluat€ tlp subsurface
orditions e4osect. lE trxarior:.sly orrdrrted a soil- and foundatiqt
innestigation at tlre subject site reported under or Job No. 23'029
dated December 3, 1981.
At the tine of our site visit, tfie erccavation had reportedly
been ocnplete to design fowrdation beariJq elevaLiqrs. Crrt d€pt]ts into
ttre sotrttrerly sloprng hillside ranged f:sn a rrrudJnrn of 12 feet irlr the
rprthwest @rner to about 2 feet in the southeast corner. The er<cavation
had nwercr:s stepdcnns generally folloudng ttre noderate slope of the site.
Seraeral areas of topsoil rtere obserrred in tie shallor cut areas of tlte er<carration.
These areas rere approxirnately 2 feet deep jJr the central garage, 5 inches in
tlte rprtlreast @rner ard rp to 2 feet jr tlre central- slab bearing area. The
@ntrastor was adrised ttnt tte topsoil should be rensred prior toonstrnrctiqr of footjngs or slabs. Duing our site visit, rsrpval of
topsoil jJr tle gcrrage area ard the northeast @rner was jnitiated.
Sgtreral areas of seepage r,'er.e observed in the e<cavatiqr with free
vater level within about 6 inctres of foundation level in several locations.
A I inctt anrstred rock ms being used as bad<fill irr apparently softer r,tet
areas for stabilization. trlo attergt in daratering was observed in ttreseareas. A trendr drain was collecting scre free ruater frcrn the rprthv'est
and rryestern portion of tte e<cavatim. @ntractor was advised of several
r€lleiniJrg soft areas wtridr should be renoved ard stabilized.
OFFICES: CA3P€R . COLORADO SPR|I|OS . DE VEn o
'ALT
l.lXE C|TY
I't. Johtr ltsras
Algtrst 2t L982
Page 2
the natural soils eposed in the erccarration be1cry the t psoil consistof silty to clayey sands ard grarrcls witJr occasionaL obbLes and srallboulders. these soils are sjmilar to those encountered in our previor:s
invesLigation and genaally suitable for spport of tlre r.eccnnended
21500 psf bearing pressure. eoLlnd vrater seepage has apparently carrsed
serreral soft areas which stould be renoved. 9{e reccnnend a positivemderdrain sllstsn be jnstalted to faeilitate da*atering of t}le e:<cavatiqr
and protcct, the lcr'Er levels againsL r,vetting. The drajn slpuld be placedat least 2 feet belorrr lcrrest, adjacent firristr grade. I-oose or distr.rbed
sojJ.s belor the footjngs sficuld be renoved prior to consre@ placanent..
Other applicable design ard cqrsUr:cCion reccnnendatiqrs presented inour origjrral report slnuld also be obsened.
Itle d-It be available for ed4itiqr observaLion and testing at yourreguest., If you have any questicns or if r,.le can be of firrther senrice,please cr"]l.
Veqg truly yours,
CHEN AIID A.SSOCIAIES, INC.
DAY/dc
Craig $rorden
Ben Elrore
Crapford DccarraLino
ffis;frh
i, 15222 I
fu'-'.$$
t
chen and assoclates
CONSULTING GEOTECHNTCAL ENGI NEERS
l0! RD. tla ottiuooo lpirxos,coroR^oo tr6or tor/ra}rasl
r -t ll
rli
u
Septenber L0, L982
Subject.: FourdaUion D<cavation
Observaticn, prcposed !,trlti-
Family Dqzelogent, Lot. 6,
Blocl< 2, Vailpotato patctr,
Vai1, Colorado.
Job No. 23,029A
5[P
I{r. Jotm ltsnas
P.O. Bol< 696Vail, @ 81557
Dear Sir:
As requestedr we cbsenred, tl:Ie e:<cavation for a proposed bati hcrJse
$jacent to tlre proposed srr,imring pool at the subjecl site on sepeenber8, L982 to q/ahnte the sr:bsr.:rface conditicns e><posed for prrpose offoundaLion sLpIDrt. hle previously corducted a s6il ana to'unoiticrnirnrestigaticn for t}e subjecE site reported rrrder our Job No. 23,029dated Decsrben 3, ]981.
At the tfue of our site visit, er<cavatsLqr for ttre proposed stJrrshlrewas essentiarly ccnplete. ort deptlrs ranged f:sn g to g rbet belcn tlree:<rslirlg gronxd rever at tne rryLritr side and frcnr 6 to 7 feet on tltedsrmhirl side. A trenctr, aboul 2 feet deeper ttnn the occavation bottcnrarri 5 foot w'ide, extended south frcrn tlre rniddre of $re o<cavation t}upughthe proposed srrinrdng trnol area. Itris cut, about 9 feet deep, was tor isq,trer and drain Une leadiJrg dcr^TntLilt frcnr ttre structure. Giavel fitledtrendres leading to the drain rine had been ixst-alled in the rniddle oftie battr house erccarration to facil-itate daratering. scne standing waterwas still existent in tlre bottcrn of the excavation. Gr:ound water r,rascbsenred to be frcrn 0 to 5 inclres belo,rr fmtiag g'rade irr npst of thee:<cavalion. witldn previorrs soft arvl wet areas of the buildingo<cavaLior, 3/4 inch cnrshed rock had been placed to about nrocimndw$r, 2 feet. Several otlrcr soft, rret areas were obsenred in tlrebottsn of the excavatim arrl the qqltractor was advised that additiqraldel^raterjJg ard subgrade stabilization sho.tld be perforned. rn ttrerernairdry areas, $re natr.ual soils erposed onsisted of sildr to clayeysands and gravels wittr scne cobbles, sirnilar to ttrose encountered h ourPfeviotls investigaticn. these natural soils aryl adeqr:ately stabilized areasshourd be sitable for suppon! of ttre recrcnnended. z,sbo psi bearirrgpressure.
OFFlClt: CAIPER . COLOnAOO gpnt OS . DENVER . SALT LAXE C|TY
-t /,-
t"tr. John Tfsnas
Septanner 10, 1982
Paqe 2
The subject elcavation is located jJr tfle area proriously idenLifiectas having sha1lcrt ground lvater condiLions requi-ring subsurface drainageto allcrr for daneJ-otrnent. Ttre q:rrent SEorlrd water level strcul-d be
expecteA to rise a:rilg seascrnf luoff. $b resnrend a permanentuderdrain q/stsn be instal-led 2 fee.L belqrr footing grade cornecCingwith the erdtiJq drain under constn:ction to protect ttre lcner slab
lerrel frcrn wetting. Other appllcabJ-e design ard co'rstrustion reccnnendaficns
Sxesented in our original reporC shor:Id al.so be cbsenred.
If you have any questiors or if r.rc can be of ft:rther serrice,please call.
Very tnrly Itours,
GInl AilID ASSOCIATES, INC.
DIrY/dc
Rev. By: S.L.P.cc! Sncx,vden & Horplsi-nsAttn: Craig Snqpden
Eldorado ErgineeringAttn: Ben Elrore
Cralyford DccarratjngAttn: R.D. Crar^rfo!:d
ffi,h3R
ffi.ri"."'";{.-"'"\! tszzz i'-h edjh,,^-.,-$ffi?t'd'!S
75 south lrontage road
vall, colorado 81657
(3qrl 479.21(x)
FAX PHONE TRANSIIITTAL SIIEET
TO:
colrpANy ualcr (cor# Tr- l<> F{ol "SFN( PTToNE NuIsER. L{ 4 L[ 33??
l-arnou: Lr tSJsax_- ?.,n{-z_-.al.^oern: 1l t-7---. rnre; 4 :Z{
tNO. oF *AGES IN DOC.'IENT (NOT INCTJTDTNG CO\'ER SIIEET) , 1
RESPONSE REQUIRED?:--
snNr sv: f r?lr -€l ExtENsroN Nuuenn: L{^)? z(z\
TOWN OF VArL FAX PHOIIE M'IIBER:303-479-2L57
March '16, '1984
Building Department
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road WestVail, Colorado 81658
Re: 770 Potato Patch
Gentl emen:
Si'lverado Banking is the lender for the project
you be so kind as to instruct your staff to copy
notices affecting or relating to the development
in advance for your cooperation.
David C. Nilges
Vice President
DCN/si
cc: D. Gordon
V. Miller
listed above. l.lill
this office with
'l i sted.
tle
Ve
SilvdadoBanlinS .Crlorado Blvd. at t-25 . 3900 E. Mc:dco Avenuc .Dcnvcr, Coloredo 80jll0 . (303) ?59-5225
(opfi
a'r .ixs>'i'rr c.)
(,) .._o61zo<(oJ6o,-.
H#ao
=JUR
E\J-.- cia(tEZlu=uJ*z6oozo
r.lJ oo=zzq55o(/J ..-ZaR3-x,-- o26<,^i(L:
o)o--a2Z, UJ
EeLlJ llJzYo5z6llt c)
8$
ooJlrJ
tF.t-A-
July 13, '1982
City of Vail
Bullding Dept.
75 S. Frontage Rd. l'lestVail, C0 81657
ATTN: Bil'l Andrews
RE: 770 Potato Patch - Units 14 and '15
Dear Mr. Andrews:
The purpose of this letter is to verify the design of the s'lab under
the stair area for Units 14 and '15 for 770 Potato Patch.
Deslgn was based on the UBC, 1982 Edition, Section 2907 b): Bearlng
Wal'ls. Bearing wa1ls shall be supported on masonary or concrete
foundations or piles or other approved foundation system which shall
be of suffJclent size to support al'l 'loads. This was done in place
of following UBC, 1982 Edition, Table No. 29-A, where it states, the
minimim depth in this situation shall be 8".
Attached you will find the verifying ca'lculations to this design.
Sincerely,
/r"- fur-rl,
Ben Elmore, EIT
BE/ilw
Encl osure
Reviewed by: JRH, P.E. & L.S.
OFFICES: GLENWOOD SPRINGS. RIFLE. DURANGO
st{Efr N(J.oF__3-*
*4e- 6,;.s. ll-11' %iLCAICULATEO. BY
CH€CXEO BY
,ri,i,' l;,;:- i";r:i3*,':,:'!
J-\
Et DORADO ENGINEERHOOHPAHY
823 Blake Avenue Box 669
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLO. 8T60I(303) 9.+8590
$c -77o +2TAro PATC-4
v1SHEET NO,
CALCULATEO.AY w.g otre ll-11-lbL
CHECXEO BY OATE
llal
vail, colorado 81657
1303) 476.5613
July 1, 1982
Snowdon and Hopkins - Architects
201 Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Attn: Craig Snowdon
Dear Sir:
department of community development
Subject: 770 Potato Patch
Plans for the above project have been checked and may be p'icked
up for correction at the Building Department office,75 South Frontage
Road, VaiI.
Corrnents and correctjons are noted in red on the p1 ans.
Please return two sets of corrected pl ans along with the checked set'
Upon approval of plans 2 sets will be stamped approved, l for the iob
and 1 for our fi I es .
Since this project has started you are hereby advised that no framing
inspections will be made without an approved set of plans on the job.
If there are any questions regarding this plan check, please contact
the undersigned between 8 and 9 a.m. or 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. Monday thru
Friday.
Si ncerely,
4,r4-Z*-
Chet Horton
Bui ldin9 Inspector
CH:df
lSry fuH*
Ben E'lmore, EIT
BE/itw
(ooP
YgllrJ ;,>Y'(Et?
(n{
O6;zo<(c)JE
p6
F*aogd
E r!,
___ uiaA(EZilF
=6oozouJooBzz
F- u]
5ccU) :.zo,
8E
'Htr9
8i
tJZ
ZUJ
$eu,l l!zY65z6lJl er)
8$
trooJ
uJ
o,u*
,lu]y 27, '1982
Toum of Vail
75 S. Frontage RoadVail, C0 81657
RE: 770 Potato Patch
Gentl emen:
This letter is to inform you that I am aware of the fact that the
truss Joint system has been changed to a llood-I system. John Becher
of Diamond International has informed nre that he has a manufacturer'sletter stating they are equlvalent.
If you have any questions concernlng this matter, please call me at
this office.
Sincerc1y,
OFFICES: GLENWOOD SPRINGS o RIFLE. DURANGO
ELDoRADo ENGrNEERrNdi"ro*,
823 Blake Avenue Box 669
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLO. 8I60I
(303) 945-8595
$e ?rm*to - ?$t co$>oLl t tJ t ouu
SHEET NO.
cALcuLATED ev WE , E.,IT oarc-Z:-?&&-
CHECKED 9Y
..:.
LDAD 1N4 .HA
10?l
|I.F
,IF
bb
llo
ttr-t
t/er
NtrL ofl'4nitl
vtu.B.|:.-:
NA
r.4r a,u tl 1*IL o5E tfl -J 't,el 6tL
{,,4{Y,.?J 1.b,,")la,^r -12 ft c?:o
),o L)Aj lt z ?,12 Rl ,ar)aCl 2?-5*l 7At
24 Lb nld It o(n \fo 'B\
(
2t(rToo
VAu
.--.1 (,,:.L t,O/,*Nt^Jl4 4\d
1"\/
6,4+,4 ,,+t2.)r
bo *)?B 4et lt -21 |L e4,*/t rye t,,IE D
l\1 rr)(2>l 1l-
H !iz;,
::ia 'di t4 V:..
tJr
t+
_aT,q ,tA ..;:Y.icoi-"-tl*'
llltr
?r0Qft A+l /^-E ej:/ lr . e4bi. $a olrrt.
@(D9CU9t;6x>.i.q86:oorzo<@J5
-8cH#ooEdEo-- td@AEZr.rJ F
2E(9oz.ouJoo3zzE35o(/) .-Zo)R3
5a26fq
=o-8D
22-
E?UJ UJzY65zcDLrj (r)
8s
!EooJ' lrJ
August 17, '1982
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road l,lestVail, C0 81657
RE: 770 Potato Patch
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed are existing elevations for Buildings 10 - 15. More
elevations will be submitted as they are obtained.
Unit l0
l. Roof elevation above master bedroom:2, Roof elevation above sitting room:3. Deck elevation outside sitting room:
Unit 'l'l
'l . Roof elevation above master bedroom:2. Deck elevation outside master bedroom:
Unit 12
508.96
507.08
497.40
l.
2.
3.
'13
Roof elevation above master bedroom:
Roof e'levation above sitting room:
Deck e'levation outside sitting room:
510.85
513.48
s03.78
509.69
497,65
534. 39
5'n .63
532.42
512 .65
Unit
Unit
l.
2.
'14
Roof elevation above master bedroom:
Garage e'levati on :
Roof elevation gbove master bedroom:
Garage elevatlon:
l.
2.
OFFICES: GLENWOOD SPRINGS. RIFLE. OUnANGO
Tom of Vall
Page Two
August 17, 1982
Unlt 15
l. Roof'elevation above master bedroom:2. Roof elevatlon above sitting room:3. Deck elevation outside sittinq room:4, Deck elevation main level:5. Garage elevatlon:
I!_Vou have any questlons concerning this matter,offlce.
Slncerely,
s35.46
538.04
528.27
518.83
513.35
please call thls
.fu1€ *o<
Ben Elmore , EIT
BEIJlw
(o
trfreuE+EP
r, IO61zo<@J5
fiq
H#aO
Fd''- C'jaAEZ
ii: trzb('ozourorc3zzq55o(/) .-Z6)
8E:526to.=d
8g-
2z
E?UJ [!
6Tz6lu a)
8$
trooJuJ
August 17, 1982
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road WestVail, C0 81657
RE: 770 Potato Patch
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed are existing elevations for Bui'ldings '10 - 15. More
elevations will be submitted as they are obtained.
Unit l0
1. Roof elevation above master bedroom:2. Roof e'levation above sitting room:
, 3. Deck elevation outside sitting room:
Unit 11
'l . Roof elevation above master bedroom:2. Deck elevation outside master bedroom:
Unit 12
Roof elevation above master bedroom:
Roof elevation above sitting room:
Deck e'levation outside sitting room:
Unit
Roof e'levation above master bedroom:
Garage elevation:
Unit
Roof elevation above master
Garage elevation:
s08.96
507.08
497.40
l.
2.
3.
't3
510.85
5't3.48
503.78
509 .69
497,65
534.39
s'l'l .63
l.
2.
l4
l.
2.
bedroom:532.42
5'l 2 .65
OFFICES: GLENWOOD SPRINGS. RIFLE. DURANGO
/
Town of Vall
Page Two
August 17, 1982
Unlt 15
l. Roof e'levatlon above master bedroom:2: Roof elevatlon above slttlnq room:3. Deck elevatlon outside sltting room:4, Deck e'levatlon main level:5. Garage elevation:
If,you have any questions concerning this matter,offl ce.
Slncere ly,
535.46
538.04
528.27
5t 8.83
513.35.
.
please call this
/€*2/,*o*
Ben Elmore, EIT
BEfilw
dro6noo .nn,nrr*,nnC.
P. O. Box 669 823 Blake Avenue
GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 8160T
E2-LtrTTT OF TRANSNflOTTAL
TO
(30:r) 94$8s96
Eu4 oF //t//-
Attached ! Under separate cover vaa
Prints I Plans E Samples
Change order
OATE IJOB NO.b-t7-/z | $,tzzn
ATTEN]ION '?7o PorATe 72'raH
the following items:
! Specifications
ARE SENDING YOU tr
! Shgl drawings
6og of letter
!
tr
COPIES DATE NO.OESCRIPTION
I 'e ' l oa'"ol lAtezJcArtotls FDQ .ANTILEUF-R SECTTAJ
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
v6 ^ppror"t
For your use
As requested
n Approved
tr Approved
n Returned
as submitted
as noted
for corrections
n
n
tr
Resubmit-copies for approval
Submit
-
copies for distribution
Return
-corrected
prints
!
tr
n
!
For review and comment n
FOR EIDS DUE 19- ! PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKSp\^Yrbe T, ve?a loEr-e*1. Wc6l9-s MLw aAGF..s MoF\?rlt>$S <orAJ-L-l
L.Lptl^JLt .t^r-tE,ti1i,,tJg. t".llo|-/'eF\T l*rJD 3++Eg, C,\?,*tL-tTtE3 3OPA-,E> A
F&-Ivo r'P a*epaY nF r'tt^^OaT A t\tJt'Ez- T*e 6lAZ2.1 4O$E>IT)O\J1 M.'l
DWthA .WLb beee oA TJT. c^6!4?.b(,t$13 AAp r-'q.trL;eai|tptsg vte€
f2 cA'<R/ vffi/c4L A/D 4pz/Fr /J4p.S
COPY TO
SIGNED:
It encrogurcs aar rot ra notad, kindly totify us tt oace.pn0qjc'I 2as2
-A€€3l
tr.. G,!dl. ts. otlt)
oEr/q^f
. lLar;'.
'i.:
Loaos .
75 P'F
/O PfrE
Lrcl€ (z4D .paD Lo40 -
ffii"fitrJ'i=#!:'%.1 .T
45r/br,&
],i
t\tl^
'h l-
i,
Lrt/€ (aaa40 Psrt ,85 7Ar TbrAL .
',B- E5x4xt.o?=6p/h.' ,lJ = 55 x. /'4? a ?e ntftr.
ftoF
R, ,1t- 7t/z''
rs! I /z',
F. . ELDORADO ENGINEEHNO.
P. O. Box 669 823 Blake Avdue
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
- .- ---=}. /n r= q=LETTEB @F TRANSNflITTAL
oarE lJoE No'
8- 17 - 92 | SEza
-77o Pa+4'+o Po-loh
(303) 94s.85e6
TO Chcl ilo,/on
C,& o/ I,/*,/
WE ARE SENDING YOU !
f Shop drawings
D Copy of letter
Attached I Under separate cover via
v6in "tr Plans E Samples
the following items:
! Specifications
E Change order tr
coPtEs DATE NO.DESCRIPTION
2 B-t1-zz Ka.t\+e) f.o'je.,-4
2 A-t1-97-Ar^iliz-l ,
Canias b-u
2 9^-11-e.2-R.,ti-c) a),,^1-9
2 C,-11-ZL RotiqA I(-ooies to-t2
2 A-11-*Ratod,I
Cooiee tz-6
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked,/.{f or approval
E For your use
E As requested
D For review and comment tr
tr FOR BIDS DUE
REMARKS
below:
E Approved
D Approved
D Returned
as submitted
as noted
for corrections
tr
tr
tr
Resubmit-copies for approval
Submit
-copies
for distribution
Retu rn
-corrected
prints
19- tr PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
stGNEot /<.e-*) u-v412 2lT
Pn00u ?a0? /^r-ersl rE G.6r Ia 0l{50 ft aarcrolrr.as ara not ,t aot d, hindly notily us al onc..
,ELDO,RADO Efi GTNEER|COil PANY JoB Porxro tj4*
SHEET NO,
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLO. 81601
(303) 94'8596 c^,-cu,.^reo. sv-ECE o^fE z-3-%z
CXECXEO AY
SCALE
,ELDORADO ENGINEERIEOMPANY
823 Blake Avenue Box 669
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLO. 81601
(303) 945-8596
at WE, E,lT 2.?2-b2- _DATE
DATE
JOB
SHEET NO
CA LC ULATE D
CHECKED BY
PRouf,r2oll ,1@ ric. G'd.i 16.01t71
box 100
vail. colorado 81657(3031 476-5613
department of community development
this plan check, please contactor 4:00 to 5:00 p-m. Monday thru
September 15, 1982
Snowdon and Hopkins, Architects201 Gore Creek Dr.Vail, Co'lorado 81657 Subject: Potato Patch 770,
Dear Craig and Pam:
Plans for above.project have been checked and may be picked up forcorrection at the Building Department office, 75-soutir Frontage Rd.,Vai I .
Comments and corrections are noted in red on the p1ans.
Please return two sets of corrected plans along with the checkedset upon cornpletion of corrections.
Upon approval of plans 2 sets will be stamped approved, l for theJob and 1 for our fi'l es.
If there are any questions regardingthe undersigned between 8 and-9 a.mlFri day .
Si ncerely,
,.. .z , -/ ,/'
'2nY /slah-
Chet Horton' ' e-
Building Inspector
CH: df
uni ts 25 &
.Ttl
rt
lumn delillmsnt nf pilics
box 567 . vail, colorado 81658 . 303-476-567i
October 26, 1982
John Thomas
Reference: Illega) Parking at 770 Potato patch Drive
Dear Mr. Thomas:
It has been brought to my attention tjme and time again that theconstructjon unrkers employed at your construction site areil1ega1ly parking on Potato Patch Drive. I have also received
numerous complaints about cement trucks, drywall trucks, etc.
b1 ocking off Potato Patch complete1y. This, of course, istotally unacceptable as to our previous arrangements.
To clarify once again what arrangements are acceptable, the vehicles
may park on Potato Patch Drjve as long as they are off the traveledportion of the road. In other words, they can park on the shoulderand not on the pavement. They nay park only on the south side ofthe road, and no parking will be allowed on any curve. Also, Iask for your cooperation in contacting your sub-contractors andexplaining to them that they are not allowed to park on Potato Patchfor the purpose of loading or unloading.
I am sympathetic to your park'ing situation on Potato Patch, and amwilling to work with you to the best of my capabilities, but we must
have that road clear for the residents that live there and for
emergency vehicles.
This wri tten letter will serve as a fjnal notice or warning, and if,in the future, any vehicles are il1ega11y parked or blocking theroad, they will be ticketed and towed without any further notices.
If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to contact
nB at the Vail Pol ice 0epartment.
Si ncerel y,
F VAIL
Curt Ufkes
Ass'i stant
CU/msj
HI
Chief of Police
TO
I
SNOWDON and HOPKINS
ARCHITECTS
201 Gore Creek Drive P. O. Box 1998
vAtL, coLoRADO 81657
------\
LETTER @ F ]TRANSNfl [TT'AL-
"^"/o /4/tf, l'"''"51c!
^rrENi'o.n Chtrk -\\or{on"'' ?rlr lc\rnn i4nrnrLf,ic' rrnl| lb - lb
GENTLEMEN:
WE
D
D
ARE
Shop
copy
SENDING YOU
drawings
of letter
Attached tl
Prints
Change order
Under separate cover via
E Plans
the following items:
n Samples /Specifications!
D !
(303) 476.2201
coPrEs DATE NO.DESCRIPTION
\l}ll'l
\dblat .1n\s Pirn+'l _Y
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
I For approval
!1rfor Your use
VAs requested
! Approved
D Approved
E Returned
as submitted
as noted
for corections
tr
tr
D
Resubmit-copies for approval
Submit
-copies
for distribution
Return
-corrected
prints
tr
tr
For review and comment tr
FOR BIDS DUE 19- ! PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO
SIGN
FOAI, !4+2 - Ay.ilall. hom @ Torr..ra, M.!.. Oi.Sg tt ancroarrrcr tra 'lol aa aotad, kindly nottlyt ua ta
TO
SNOWOON and H/ ,.lNS
ARCHITEC', :
?Ol Gore Llreek Drnre P. O. Box 1998
vAtL coLoRADO 81657
LETTER @F TRANSNfl IT-TAL
the tollowing items:
Plans y tr Samples /Specifications
GENTLEMEN:
WE
!
tr
ARE SENDING YOU
Shop dnwings
Copy of letter
tr
u
D
D
oATE. . ; .- lJoa No. | ,--,,,:Ltlrt.i | ''.1 ,arrENitoN ft
.f r rrif" , t-(-i r ;
,/ ,*
EI Attached- [ Under separate cover via
Prints \
Change order
COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION
-r Jt \ .-1 r l-t-
-T
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked
E For approvaliE for your use
V As requested
E For review and comment D
tr FOR BIDS DUE
belo'/r:
D Approved as submitted
fl Approved as noted
! Returned for corections
Resubmit-copies for approval
Submit-copies for distribution
Retum
-corrected
prints
tr
tr
tr
19- D PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO
FOFta zaGZ - Ay.IrU. tcn @TotrE rd. M!r!. ora00 ,t Gncrosuros ata not aa aot.d, kindly notiry u. ea onca.
p. o. Box il. "r" lm""J"Y:lt ""o*" l-o""-,",")ti'
I
{'Jho-fu/"q-fla/7/
4 tl
d P-i^l4/,
BY
Wr*-t*4k /-K/*;-
O , #zt #frJJ.
(oa9.E. ><a\;;9uJ ;,>.i.q36l
O 611zo<@J6
Ro
li'i <trccu>O
s2dEo-- </i@AEZ
HF46OozouJoo=zzq55o(/) ..-Zo,o!P
--{
>6tr9
6qa>zt)E>
UJ uJzuo5z6uJ c)a'r c\J6co
IEooJl!
August 17, 1982
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road WestVail, C0 81657
RE: 770 Potato Patch
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed are existing elevations for Buildings l0 - '15. More
elevations will be submitted as they are obta'ined.
Unit l0
'l . Roof elevation above master bedroom:2. Roof elevation above s'itting room:3. Deck elevation outside s'itt'i ng room:
Unit '11
I. Roof elevation above master bedroom:2. Deck e'levation outside master bedroom:
Unit 12
Roof e'levation above master bedroom:
Roof elevation above sitting room:
Deck elevation outside sittine room:
Roof e'levation above master bedroom:
Garage elevation:
Unit'14
Roof elevation above master bedroom:
Garage elevation:
l.
2
?
s08.96
s07. 08
497 ,40
509.69
497.65
5'10.85
51 3. 48
503. 78
534. 39
511.63
Unit l3
't.
2.
t.
2.
532.42
512.6s
t
DUTIANOFFICES: GLENWOOD SPRINGS . NIFLE.GO
Town of Vail
Page Two
August 17, 1982
Unlt 15
l. Roof elevation above master bedroom: 535.46Z, Roof elevation above sitting room: 538.043. Deck elevatlon outside sitting room: 528.274, Deck elevation main 'level: 518,835. Garage elevation:513.35
If,you have any questlons concerning this matter, please call thlsoffi ce.
Sincerely,
,<*f€ *on
Ben Elmore, EIT
BE/jlw
o
170\Arr, Vrt-r--qcb Ixx
Village Inn Plaza Condomiruums e
A"
\0-
July 2, 1987
Mr. James J. Co111ns
777 Potato Patch DrlveVall, CO.81657.
Dear J.J.:
Thank you very much for copyJ-ng me on your letter to Peter Jamar.
Thls is the firsc tlme I have heard about a proposal of addltlonal
unlEs at 777 Potato Patch Drive.
Let ne start by saying Ehat I 1002 agree wlth the contents of your.letter of June llth to Peter Jamar. I was servlng as Councilman
clurlng the time that properEy was zoned, and it was then the
recommendation of the Town staff and Plannlng Commission that all
the property on Potato Patch should be zoned residentlal. It was
only after Vail Assoclates threatened not to annex the property that
Che Councll reluctantly agreed to nu1tl-fam11y zoning on variousparcels, lncluding the 777 Potato Patch proJect.
To lncrease the number of unlts would only make an already intolerablesltuation worse, Keeping ln mlnd that the area is a long way frorn
belng bul1t out and thaE Ehe road ls narrow and dangerous, r.r'e should
do everythlng that we are capable of to prevent addltlonal unitsnot yet zoned from belng allowed in the neighborhood,
P1ease let me know lf Lhere ls anythlng furEher I can do other thanraising rny strongest objectlons to the Town of Vall by copy of this
lecter.
Slncer y yours,
Josef taufe r
JS3
Peter Patten, Town of Vall
.. Pator J.!ar
Copy to:
100 East Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 476-5622
o
WESTEF]r| ?ELE.CC'MMCTN|CAI.ICUUq !NC.
LAF|F|Y ROMFIELL
EXECTJTIVE VEE PFI€SICENT
OIFECTOFI
May 27,1987
Peter Jamar Associates, Inc.Suite 308Vail National Bank Building
108 South Frontage Road WestVail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Janar:
fn response to your May 22rd nremcrandum concerning your plans to seek
approval of 20 additional units aE 770 Potato Patch Drive, f have tbe
foJ.lowing comentss I vould be very cpncerned about any increased
density to 770 Potato Patch Dri\re. In addition, it is my opinion that
770 has had a dramatic negative effect on all property values near and
above it on Potato Patctr Drirre. Your menrorardum refers to people
attractecl to Potato Patctr because of "panoramic views and sunny
exposuresn - 770 Fotato Patch colpletely destroyed the views for manyof the qper residenc€s. It is not arcjhitecturally consistent nith
the existing hqnes and has curpletely changed tbe feeling of a rather
exclusive, lovr-profile area to a poorly constructed, low cost, high
densiQr housing comunity.
I definitely would appreciate receiving
information as it becomes available.
specific developrenE
Rcrnrell
799 Potato Patch Drive
r8,/srn
cc: City Planning Ccnrnission
Garv Bossow
GENERAL OFFICES . PAFIK PI-AC€ . I'€I9O OTC BOULEVAFIO . SU]TE !'CE
P.O. 8OX 4117 . €I{GI-E\^/C,OO, Cq.OeAOO Elolsl' . (:D 7g6.et@
Sincerely,
PETER IAMAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
PLANNING, OEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS, RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
perty OwnergTo: Potato Patch PAbFrom: Peter .lamai(JDate: llay 22, 1987
RE:'/7O Pot at o Patch Drive
Seeond Phase Unimproved Land
Durlng the fal-I of L984, I was retained to asslst in aneffort to revige the currently approved development pLan asit relates to future phase deveJ.opnrent at 77O Potato PatchDrive, Our strbmittal requested the approval of twenty (20)
conparatively smaller condomj.niums ranging ln size from 1,1OOto 1,50O square feet for two- and. three bedroons respectivelyrather than the currently approved fourteen (14). Noteworthyfeatures would include designer kitchens, expansive masterbedroom sui.tes, upgraded landscaping and oversized garages.Even erith the additional condominiuns, the overall aitedensity remains with j.n the medium density multi-family aoningdesignation currently in place. The Town of Vail's Planningand Envj.ronnental Comrnission approved our request citing animproved site plan, 7X less Gross Residential Floor Area(GRFA), less building site coverage, concealed overfl-owparking, no requested variances, and that the lessened sizeof the newly proposed condominiums wouJ.d '.result in lesgdirect sales compet j-tion within the gubdivision. Swayed byvar:.ous political considerataons, the Vail Town Council optedagainst our request; thus the site renains in disarray.
The property owner has agai.n asked me to approach theTown and restrbmit our original request which would tikelyallow for f j-na1 completion of the project within two tothree years. My client f eel-s that each Potato Patch
homeowner would be best served if we were abLe to modify thecurrent design and develop a product which does not directlycompete $rithin the exj.stj-ng spectrum of Potato Patch
condomini.umg and residences.Further,they feel itadvantageous to encourage and create interest from aqualified market participant which may not be interested inacguiring one of the expansive condominiums or residences,
Suite 308, Vail National Bank Building
108 South Frontage Road Wesl . Vail, Colorado 81657 . (303) 476-7154
a
but which is attracted to Potato. patch
panorami c ' vi:ers", anQ. gunny ex.posures.
Arguably, constructj.on would nean additional traffic on analready dangerous road and the nuisances associated with on-going constructi-on. In support, however, it can mean nelrexc j.tement atrd life for a property constant.ly perceJ"ved asdistressed.
In order to modify the current development parameters,vre nust first submit the proposal to .the Town Council fortheir review and approval. As you may be aware, the Townplanning staff and Council will be quite interested in theresponse fron surrounding property owners.To conpensatesurrounorng property owners for the nuigances associated withfurther development, my client is willJ.ng to estabJ.ish a fundof 93O,OOO.O0 to be adrninj-stered by a Homeowners, committeecomposed and for the benefit of property owners locatedabove the Piney Lake turn on Potato Patch Drive should oursubmittal of 1984 be approved largely intact.My cI ientwould not seek part j.ci.pation on the committee.
It j.s my opinion that the $3O,OOO.OO might be just thecatalyst necessary to establish an upper Potato patch
honeor.rner's committee which could be instrumental inpetitioning the Town for much overdue subdivi.sionLmprovenents such as road repair and street lighting whichare purportedly financed by property taxes.Expendituresfor such items as recreational amenities, signage to <lissuadesightseers, a landscaped entry and perhaps a security gatecould also therr be considered.
As a longtime Vail resident and past' member of theTown's Community Development Department, it is my feelingthat substantial damage ha_s been dorre to the surroundingproperty values by the current development plan and that the
n mplemerrta !:icn of that pJ.an was less than optimun. However,I also believe that responsible conpletion and maturity of77O wj-J-I enharrce surroulrd:i.ng property values if future
o
developnrent is; bet terimplemented.planned anrl
because of the
more responsibl y
fn conclus j-on, enclosed is a guestionnaire that whencompleted and returned wj.lI allow t-ts to sample your rea<:tionsto our proposal prior to formally submitting the revised plan1:o the Toern of Vail .Shor"rLd the enclosed ouestionnaireindicate that this proposal is Ii}<eIy to receive a poorreception f ronr a s j.grrif icant; nunber of homeowners, it isunlikely that the revised deveJ.crpmerrt- plan r*oulcl beresubmittecl to the Town.
Thank you ln advance for your cooperation and timelyassistance and please contact me j.f you have any guestlons.
PJ /nh
enclogure ( s )
oz
E
=tLI.L
oro(\,
ooo
ooooo
C'
UJuJtr-
E
=EuJo
tn
s
(f)
c}
tl)
c.')(o
oo
o(flr)(\l
oo
cOo
o
"':(o
F)ro
(\j
oo
o
(f)
oO
orr)
wld
F
=EuJo-az
!
to
YogJ
()z
c
IEFoUJ
u,
o2
ao
==d
J
9z
ouj
=
u,u,u-zI
u,lE(tu,E
oE
oo3g
uJGz
-v,
UJo
tsu,ocu.loA
2
uJ(,
x
FulU'l
q>ulr!|r
=E.
o
J
FoF
0z
I
o
9
F
UJ
u,
(Jz
=)Jo-
Iz
C)lr,T
NOrrvnlv^
:;o
=uJdi=.oN
zzoo
F-ltq5:E? O
.tt O5b<)zu-<o\uJ:<gUFOj(\i
YGo
=ozoFL
G()<tttct
EUJzqJo
rl'lol
rf)l*l
roi
.h+,.E
5
]AtU(Utl-l6lo
zlol
FI<l
-,1<l>l
F
oo
Lf,oEo
UJ
c
c
c
(.
/-ryv,rr//'-="tJk*r
, /,,-_4 */ ?r'"_s/ g/J
m-rf/ /=-PQy%
-*rv? mHrsz7z;/ &fr"o'-*lO7Y(vry4
/#ry4-
c(Y
at
Id
oE
o
.;
f
.;
o
Eg
co
.!C)
CLo
UJF
o
ulFaoo?zo
Fo-ut:<r!ooF
ts
=(rulG
tl.o
Go.o
I
ulFoz
E
=Euto.t!or,U,tro'12 zE<cLf93o-a9
=.8tr.F t>
=Ul-E F=Q 1EedulE 6tE 90g =tutrxc! ;IXu'
-J;#
u,(o0F
d
',1.:
v4
-/
zo9zeloo
=zlfJOLt+
E[-ln
o.a
!r, c.=(oJCo';:EEai.(dC...' '.6.o.ltF-'i=o6o5
5 r.'t >.a6=
EPoo\E()'-oo?lti
-6o.o.
-al
(\,1cfIF
It\
F la
=liG I'lrl r-
o-zoFo
:)
E,Fazo()
/(--.\/.x=\'{lE\rJJ=
L;
J<o59
=Ezo!:-JY(-)A;E
ElEi. .
/ryry4ryou4
-r.4r4*7"a-n.n/*fu %
t'fuv--f'**t 4-ry-?ry2.%&4,1,--,TJry.,E
zru-'rra'w/ r32to1tj,ry "TVa?a-t,a.//, I -ry
f J/tt // .,m
ryry'*f,ryV'%
luatulredag luaudoloraq rt3unuruo3
".'4 ,tr
'o/fry
"ww/'7w '6os
-4{TL
1' .-,t t\
D ,-
,l .-.l----il
5oLO TO
l--Vail- Investments &
P.O. Box 596
1 Vail, CO 81658
I
9-23-82 | To date lDelivered I Contract
'-'rY='T_-F-
6541 SOUTH trOLLEGE AVENUE o FORT COLLINEi, CtrLORADO BBSZ5
PHBNE (3O3) 226-2657
SH IPPED TO
Development Co, _l
770 Potato Patch Drive
Vail, CO 81658
I
Total ContracE Amount
completed up thru concrete
and spa.
Total amount due this invoice
Work
pool
placement on swirmti
004038
6 ,000. 0l
33, 600. 0(
33, 600.01
Jobsite
|((l ,[lt-,1r,i
@
|''|J
z
UJ
Y
J
g
c,
Jo
U)oz
U)
o
o3zl!Jo
o)@
@Xo(D
o
o.
a(ro
f
U'oz
Jo
IIJ
ulF2
I.IJaf
actU
UJz
z
uJoztrJf,
z
O
28 December ]982
ilob #81229
LEGAL DESCRIPTI0N - Drainage Easement
A strip of'land'10 feet wide lying 5 feet on each side of the
following described centerline, situate in Lot 6, Block.2 of
Vail/Potito Patch as recorded in the office of the C'lerk and
Recorder's office of Eagle County, Colorado, being more
particularly described as fol lows:
Beginning at a point on the northerly boundary of sai.d..Lot.6,
wh6nce tFe northwest corner of Lot 5, Block 2 of sajd Vail/
Potato Patch, said point also bejng on the southerly boundary
line of said Lot 6lnd the northerly right-of-way line of
Potato Patch Drive, bears South 29 degrees 14 minutes 44 seconds
East a distance of-401.86 feet, with ill bearings contained herein
being relative to the final plat of said Vail/Potato Patch; thence
South a distance of 7.55 feet; thence South 35 degrees 50 minutes
'f 5 seconds West a distance of 22.2A feet; thence South 10 degrees
29 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 54.92 feet; thence South
64 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East a distance of 35.34 feet;
thenc6 South 19 degrees 26 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of
36.06 feet; thence-South 77 degrees ll minutes 44 seconds East a
distance of 22.56 feeti thence South a distance of 58-00 feet;
thence South 23 degrees 42 minutes 09 seconds West a distance
of 44.78 feet; thence South 14 degrees 32 minutes 04 seconds
btest a distance of ?7.89 feet; thence South 4l degrees 38 minutes
00 seconds l'lest a d'istance of 36.12 feeti thence South 04 degrees
05 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 40.3'l feet to the terminus
of the above described centerljne and the souther'ly boundary'line of said Lot 6, whence the northwest corner of said Lot 5
bears South 82 degrees 39 minutes 04 seconds East a distanceof 186.74 feet.
The
of
N
z
z
ul
uJz
z
u,l
il
above described easement is subiect to change upon completion
an accurate field survey.
OFFICES: GLEN!VOOo SPRINGS. RIFLE. DURANGO
o
28 December 1982
Job #81229
LEGAL DESORIPTION - Drainage Easement
A strip of land'10 feet wide lyjng 5 feet on each side of the
fo]lowing descrjbed centerline, situate jn Lot 6' Block.2 of
Vail/Potito Patch as recorded in the office of the Clerk and
Recoi'der's 0ffice of EagIe County, Colorado, being more particu-
lar'ly described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the southerly boundary line of said Lot
6,-sald [oint aiso being on the northerly right-of-way line of
p6tato Pitch Drive, whence the northwest corner of Lot 5 of said
Vail/Potato Patch, said corner also being on the southerly
boundary line of Lot 6 and the northerly right-of-way line of
Potato Fatch Drive, bears South 6'l degrees 5l m'inutes l4 seconds
East a distance of 5.49 feet, with all bearings contained herein
being relative to the fina'l p'lat of said Vai'l/Potato Patc-h; thence
ItortF 44 degrees 40 minutes 07 seconds East a distance of'120.49
feet to the-terminus of the above described centerline; thence
South 42 degrees 07 minutes 57 seconds Hest a distance of 119.04
feet, to said northwest corner of Lot 5.
The above described easement is subject to change upon completion
of an accurate field survey.
o
@
@
L)
@
!orirI
o(r)o.\
oo
96(ro
loA
zOj'o
oonJ .,i
Fa-oEtr6lrO.>o
o"d. 3uJzutu1 JO(,z-\tll O,.i@zi- ><
=of,tI)
zOOn
\;'-z
==urxY
ojz
l|CoLUz
z
uJ
o
ooJ
UJ
oFFtcES: cLENWOoD spntNGS . RtFLE. DURANGO
trwn
75 soulh lrontage rd.
Yall, colorado 8'1657
(303) 476-7000
department of community development
Decenber 27, 1982
John ThonnsVail Investments and Development, Ltd
4558 East Meadow Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear John, *tt 770 Potato Patch Drive
Recently, upon the review of the Phase I condo plat for 770 Potato Patch Drive'
we djscbvered a nunber of variations from the approved DRB plans. The most
significant change is the new floor'l evel below the "lower level" of units 5
ani O. As I expiained to you in the office last week, the ceil ing height and _the existence oi a pernnnent ttoor in this area qualify it as Gross Residential
Floor Area (GRFA) aird we must count it toward the overal'l allowable in the project-
I real ize tliat there is only a sma'l I access via a 'ladder to th_is space, but
Steve Patterson has explainLd that the area still cannot be called a crawl space.
There wou'l d be no problem in improving the access to this area along with other
improvements as Ioirg as you obtain the necessary approvals for doing so from
our departrnent.
There are a nunber of other minor changes in Phase I which increase the GRFA
on the project. A11 the changes are noted below in the chart, along with the
new figures for your rennining GRFA in Phase II.
The bottom I ine figure of 998 square feet must be taken out of
the project into the allowed overall GRFA. We wil] be happy to
and Craig on accomplishing this previous to issuing a building
Hope you have a nice holiday season.
Phase II to fit
work with you
permit for Phase II.
As
A. PETER PATTEN, JR
Sen'ior Planner
APP:bpr
Enc'|. table of GRFA Analysis
a
ER 1982770 POTATO, PATCH DECEI'IB
UN IT
GRFA ANALYSIS FOR
DRB
GRFA
I 955
1863
1863
1955
1833
I 955
1833
1863
1896
1955
I833
1896
.l833
1863
1896
1800
817
EX ISTING
GRFA DI FFERENCE
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
'10
ll
t2
t3
't4
t5
25
Ca reta ker
1955
1863
1863
t 9s5
2874
218'l
1833
't863
1896
't9s5
1848
1896
1848
1863
t'896
1800
805
32,194
24,247
56,44]
NA
NA
NA
M
104'l
266
NA
NA
NA
NA
t5
NA
l5
NA
NA
NA
-12
'1325PHASE I TOTAL
PHASE II BALANCE
TOTAL ALLOI.IED
TOTAL BUILT (PHASE I) AND PLANNED (PHASE ri)
GRFA TO BE TAKEN OUT OF PHASE II
57,439
998
ir.-
Date hlrlrr
-7-7-
APPLICATION FORM FOR A CONDOMINIIJM/TOWNHOUSE PLAT REVIEW
A. Nane of Applicant
Address
,/),'€p
-oae
Address
c.Authorization of
Signature
Mdress
D. Locat
Lot
ion
O
of Proposal
ilocy 2 Filins
E. Fee $100
F. !,bterials to be submitted shall include:
1. on9 conplete set, of the plat including site nap, floor area nap, elevationsand sections, This can be in nylar oi print rbirn upon subnittii. Dea;iirequirenents for a condoniniurn/townhouse plat can be found in Sectionof the subdivision regulations,
2. One nylar copy of the site map t.o be retained by the Torin of Vail for records.
3. A copy of the declarations and covenants to show that landscaping provisionsare included.
4. Any other infornation requested by the zoning administrator or Town engineer.
G. The plat shall include a signature block for the Town of Vail with a line desig-nated for the senior planner/zoning adninistrator for his signature along witha date line for said signature.
H. Review Period:
Within l0 days of neetin$ subnittsl requirements as hcrein listed, the plat
shall be approved or disapproved by the Public lrforks Dcpartment and the
Conmunity Developncnt Dcpartment. If disapproved, the plat shall be rcturned
along with a writtcn description of the reasons for disapproval . The plat
shall not be revicwed again until corrections or rnodifications are nade cs
they relate to the recsons for disnpproval . Every timc a plat, is subnitted
or resubnitted, thc l0 day review pc'riod will apply. Thc plat shall bc tlccnred
approved by the Town of Vail if no action is takcn within l0 days of a corrcct
and valid subnittal .
I
Profect Application
Proiect Name:
\
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Addr€ss and Phone:
b , r,o"*
., " 'i.*lt',.igr*ri*l, li*
^ .; 'l ,: i:'i'
f" . '*.,riF7l'
,u^n 7F/{ ,t'^"y'JQy''/F
Design Review Board
Date
DISAPPROVAL
. xFtr-rt/Ell
---
5rA9
q9V
nfu 6e+
--Z -/?5s/e //#cc tasy'
D t ?ss/E /ssslD / gssl
E /zsz/a tsefC B?6f fiswr6 /ltr/.E /833 FD t??a Y?'@d -,€ | 733'6'c 18es Y! /sf6f'l/0Es+r /7211#
I7o
e
//*' bf 6l
ful ,/ar/
6cK 'z/ ftttYa e/
hrsra 3,?z 4err4
Buc4re-.4aaea ,3,2o ,UJS
tr^-
QSpsr t {)
Qu,,tzl $)
{6t qlo / ,/Jo + /F* u.vt@y2"a
uNtr+ /
tftl
23'-q
I zs{ tzsv ,
L eo + l7c. 6
7
8.7)/o*,{ L /lrtL+ri I /gl /Y
.<r. llo ItgL/r
+qi /6
U{rts:
'-'Z-
/7
/g
/7
7/
7t
7z
L3vl7s
eb
272/u
3o
FeltlS6P '
/68 |
/6el
/6rl
/ 83s
/a6l
1zt/
a
wn lTfr GzF'A7 Wvfr lcu{lnaqrg /88vA ftoo(2?rc,ts /88rB /96'/A ts'of /rW*6 /xsvA6
6
6
Q€
€
earx4
*6
C
2r
6
-- 4x
Tx
_- fltx
lgn
/ trsq
1/63ET
/89elx fl4
4 x /6st
7w
4'rzo
7fZtrfif{k -i,ffi':;os'7/6f
/7L(
674#t >t7
ryfun.{6 t?6-'leY
.:.
tuwn n
75 soulh tronlage rd.
vall, colorado 81657
(303) 475-7ooo
o
department of community development
November 3, '1982
Mr. John Thonns
P.0, Box 696
Vai'l , Colorado Bl658
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Re: 770 Potato Patch Changes
It has come to the Town's attention that several changes have been made
to the 770 Potato Patch project since the Design Review Board approved
the project. These changes are out1 ined in detajl in Craig Snoldon'sletter of September 13,'1983. (See attached letter.)
The significant changes are:
I ) Flip flopping unit 252) Revision of caretaker floor p'l an3) Revision of GRFA as fol'lows:
. a. Unit 6 f 30 square feetb. Unit 5 +285 square feet
Th;ORFA revisjons bring the tota'l built a4d p'lanned square feet to 56,44'l
square feet, 3l square feet over the a'l'lowed GRFA of 56,4.l0. Thjs 3l squarefeet must be taken out of the second phase of the project.
The other changes as outl ined instaff approved.
Sincerely,
Snowden's 'l etter of September I3 are
,]IM SAYRE
PI anner
JS : bpr
Encl .
cc: Craig Snowdon
Snowdon and HoPkins o Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive
P. O. Box 1998 Vail, Colorado
Sepfember 13, 19Bz
303 476-2201
81657
Tom of Vail Planning DePb.
75 South Frorrtage Road
Vail, C0 81657
ALtention: Peter Jamar/Jim SaYre:
As per our discussion Augu-st 6, 198,2r-I am sutxnitting a J'ist of
modifications to tnJfi"!l-pr,u"" of irc Potalo Patcl Drive (Units 1-15,25'
caretaker and pool house) as you requesteci. These changes were due to site
conditions and TOV Suif.lj-r,g Department requesls which occurred during the
;;i;ai;, of the wo"r.ine 5"u"ing". As we had dlscussed, because the
Developerrs timetaOil *! u""y grgftt, it was our unCerstanding that minor
changes and some ,*l;"";"n,cl! t"! in grl" case of unit 5 and the caretaker
rinit) could be brought bo the Tor,rn staff's attention for review and then
incorporated into Lte Drar,rings without goir:g Lhrough_t,he DRB process every
time a ehange o""r"r"o. nt Ine comptetlon of Ph"se 1 we then could review
all changes ,r.i. *a-Jecj.de if' DRB notificali,on and presentation was
necess"ry. 'Because Phase 2 will not begin until next year and our
. tjrneLable wiII allow us to conptete bire remainder of the working Drawi-ngs
prior to beginning construction' i^,e can.present "i{ g:::}?le modifications
to the DRB before proeeedirtg. I appreciite your cocperation in this matLer
over the past months, and hope the project ,uill b" an exciting assel' to the
corrnunityrs design.
Follorving are Lhe list of changes beirg subnritLed ori a per building basis:
Units 13-15i. Additional window (bedroom 3) to 1or"'cr tevel Unj"t 14'
2. Beorganization of ba'iroom 3 plan atrd vtindows 1'o accommodate
grades better at lower leve1 Unit 15'
3. Addibional winclows added to western dinir4l rocm-ural-l at main
level Unit 13 (reorganization of inLerior spaces)'
4. Ilevised configuration of main 1evel deck to accommodate
cantilever design at ctlning room of tJrrit 15'
5. Modification of--entry couri walls of Units '13 and 1it '
6. Subsbitubion of swinging patio doors instead of slicliruI glass
doors and adclitional windows at the upper level of Unj'ts 13'
14, and .15.
7. Relocation of sPa unit and
Unit 13.
deck access door to uPPer lerrel
Units 10-121. No|es 2 & 4 above for Units 10 and 12'
,ti.T
o
2. Note 3 above for Unit 11.3. Notes 5 & 6 above for UniLs 10, 11, and 12.4. Note 7 abdve for Unit 11.
Units 7-9 (same as 13-15)1. Notes 'l , 5 & 6 above for Unit B.2. Notes 2, 4 & 6 above for Unit 9.3. Notes 3, 5, 6 & 7 above for Unit 7.
unl_Is 5 and b1. Relocation of windows i.n bedroom 3 lower leve1 Unit 6.2. Change in garage slab elevation from $St-grt Lo 87'-11 rtand
lowering the living/dllirrg/kitchen level (which also lowers
bedroom and sit,ting room levels) from B7t-6t' to B4r-5".
3. Revising entry access to Unit 6.4. Revision in total G.R.F.A. for Unit 6 from 2000 s.f. bo 2030s-f.5. Due to minor shifts in building locat.lons for Units 1-4 and
Units 7-9r Unit 5 required major design mo^lifciafion to alf. levels to keep unit within required property setbacks (see
plans and elevatlons).6. Revision iI total G.R.F.A. from 1845 s.f. to 2050r s.f.7. Change in garage slab elevation fron $$t-gtt to 87'-11".
Units 1-41. Additional windows in lower level bedrooms - Un.its 1,2 &3.2. Reorganization of bedroom 3 plan and windows to accommodate
grades better at l-ower level Unit lt .3. Revised configuration of mai-n level deqk to accommodate' cantilever' desi,grr at dining room of Units 1 and 4.4. ModificaLion of entry courL walls at all units.. 5. Additional storage baystogarage of Uni-ts 3 and 4.6. Reverse of J-ivi.ng room cantilever and firepJ-ace structtire oftlnit 4 to improve unit vie',vs.7. Substitution of swinging patio doors inslead of slidirrg glass
. doors and additional windorvs aL upper leve1 of all units.
Unit 251. Revising unit orientation by flip-flopping unit (living roomis located to the west ) and allor.rirrg Lower portion of unit
design to be on the most exposed I'acade.2. Additionalrvi-ndows added to west elevatj-on of living room
kitchen and naster bath.3. Relocai:ion of caretal<er unlt t,o allow for additional winclows
n north and easL l,alls of master bedroon a:rd bath.
' Caretaker Unit,1. Revision of flocr plan to accommodate UniL 25 re-orientation
and connection to poofhouse.2. Ilevision of loLal- G.R.F.A. from 775 s.t. fo 805* s.f . (with
revised entry vesLibule).
t'
Poolhouse1. Revlsion of floor pJ-an with reduction in s.f. and sj.ze.2. Revision irl south elevatlon window and door configuration.
f would like to sit down and revlew this lisb wlth you at your convenience,
and answer any questlons you may have. Vle could then decide if apresentation to the DRB is necessary. Please let me loow when roe can get
tOgether, and agag ttrank you for your cooperation on this matter.
Sincerely,
CNS/ncc
cc: J. Thcmas
....:- .,., -,-.- .!_,-_-.-.- .. _.'".G!lI
,t
Snowdon and Hopkins r Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive g0g 426-220,1
P. O. Box 1998 Vail, Colorado 81657
September 13, 1982
Toun of Vail Planning hpt.
75 South Frontage RoadVait, CO 81657
Attention: Peter Jamar/Jim Sayre:
As per our discussion August 6, 1982, I an subnitting a List of
modifications to the first phase ot 770 Potato Patch Drive (Units 1-15, 25,
caretaker and pool house) as you requested. These changes were due to slte
conditions and TOV Building Departrnent requests which occurred during the
completion of the Working Drawings. As we had discussed, because the
Developerfs timetable i^ras very tj€ht, it was our understandllg that minor
changes and some major changes (as in the case of uni-t 5 and the caretakerunit) coul-d be brought to the Town staff's attention for revlew and then
lncorporated into the Drawings without going through Lhe DRB process every
tjme a change occured. At the completion of Phase I we then could reviewall changes made and decide if DRB notification and presentation wasnecessary. Because Phase 2 will not begin unt11 next year and our
timetable will allow us to complete the remainder of the l/orking Dnawingsprior to beginning construction, we can present any possible modificationsto the DRB before proceeding. I appreciate your cooperati-on in this matter
over the pa.st months, and hope lhe project will be an exciting asset to the
conrnunityrs design,
Following are the list of changes being submitted on a per building basis:
Units 13-151. Additional window (bedroom 3) to lower level Unit 14.2. Reorganization of bedroom 3 plan and vrindows to acconmodate
grades bet,ter at lower level Unit 15.3. Additional windows added bo western dining room wall at main
1evel Unit 13 (reorganization of interior spa.ces).4. Revised configuration of maln 1evel deck to accormnodatecantilever design at dining room of Unit 15.5. Modification of entry court r,ral1s of Units 13 and 14.6. Substitution of sr.,ringing pa.tio doors instead of sliding glass
doors and additlonal r,,rindows at the upper leve1 of Units 13,t+, ano t).7. Relocation of spa unit, and deck access door to upper levelUnit '13.
Units 10-121. Notes 2 & 4 above for Units 10 and 12.
,r.tfr,
t'
2
2. Note 3 above for tlnit 11.3. Notes 5 & 6 above for Units 10, 11, and 12.4. Note 7 above for Uni.t 11.
Unlts 7-9 (same as 13-15)1. Notes 1, 5 & 6 above for Unit 8.2. Notes 2, 4 & 6 above for Unit 9.3. Notes 3, 5, 6 & 7 above for Unit 7.
Units 5 and 61. Relocation of wi.ndows in bedroom 3 lower 1evel Uni.b 6.2. Change 1n garage slab elevation from $$t-6tt to 87t-11rrand
Iowerlng the livirg/dining/kitchen level (which also lowers
bedroom and sitting room leve1s) from 87t-6" to 84t-5t'.
3. Revising enbry access to Unit 6.4. Revision in tobal G.R.F.A. for Unit 6 from 2000 s.f. to 2030
5-r -5. Due to minor shifts in building locations for Unils 1-4 and
Unlts 7-9, Unit, 5 required major design modifciation to all
levels to keep unit within required property setbacks (see
plans and elevations).6. Revi-sion in total G.R.F.A. from 1845 s.f . to 2050t s.f .7. Change in garage slab elevation from 86t-0u to 87t-11tt.
Units 1-41. Additional windows in lower level bedrooms - Units 1,2 &3.2. Reorganizatlon of bedroom 3 plan and windows to accornnodate
grades better at lower level tlnit 4.
3. Revised configuration of main level deck to acconrnodate
cantil-ever design at dining room of Units 1 and 4.4. Modification of entry court walls at aII units.5. Additional storage baystogarage of Units 3 and 4.6. Reverse of living room cantilever and fireplace structure of
Unit 4 to improve unit views.7. Substitution of swinging patio doors instead of sliding glass
doors and additional windows at upper level" of all- units.
Unit 251. Revi-sing unit orientation by flip-flopping unit (living roomis located to the west) and allowing lower portion of unit
design to be on the most exposed facade.2. Additionalwi-ndowsadded to west elevation of livlng room
kitchen and master bath.3. Relocati-on of caretaker unit to a1low for additional windows
on north and east walls of master bedroom and bath.
Caretaker Unit1. Revision of fl-oor plan bo accorrnodate UniL 25 re-orientation
and connection to poolhouse.2. Revision of total G.R.F.A. fron 775 s.f. to 805t s.f. (with
revised entrv vestlbule ),
Poolhouse1. Revision of floor pLan ruith reduction in s.f. and size.2. Rerrlslon in south elevation wlndow and door configuration.
I would like to sit down and r"eview this list wlth you at your convenience,
and answer any questions you may have. We could then decide if apresentation to the DRB is necessarJr. Please let me hnow when we can gettogether, arrt again thank you for your cooperation on this natter.
Sincerely,
CNS/ncc
cc: J. Thomas
@ ?:|-. 1
/."\ 'i'-v;?EP
=(>o61Zo<@J=
urgFrraDO(t^ulx
..- ciaaEZ
zV)(,ozouJoo=zzF u.l
5o(/') --zao9
--- f;>6<,..i(LY
=Lo:()=o;ziJF>il<Ltl 111zYolz6lIJ d)o*
cooJlrJ
August 17, 1982
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road l.lest
Vail , C0 8'1657
RE: 770 Potato Patch
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed are existing elevations for Buildings l0 - '15. More
e'levations will be submitted as they are obtained.
Unit'10
'1. Roof elevation2. Roof elevation3. Deck elevation
Unit I I
'1. Roof e'levation2. Deck elevation
Uni t '12
Roof e'levation
Roof elevation
Deck elevation
above master bedroom:
above sjtting room:
outside sitting room:
above master bedroom:
outside nnster bedroom:
above master bedroom:
above sitting room:
outside sitting room:
1.
2.
3.
13
508. 96
507.08
497.40
509.69
497.65
51 0. 85
51 3. 48
503. 78
Uni t
1.
2.
'14
Roof elevation above master bedroom:
Garage elevation:
Roof e'levation above master bedroom:
Garage e'levati on :
534. 39
5't 't .63
Unit
l.
2.
532.42
5'12.65
OFFICES: GLENWOOD SPRINGS ' RIFLE ' DURANGO
Tovn of Vail
Page Two
August 17, 1982
Unit 15
l. Roof elevatlon above master bedroom: 535.462. Roof elevatlon above slttlng room: 538.043. Deck elevatlon outslde sltting room: 528.274. Deck elevation maln level: 518.835. Garage elevatlon: 513.35
If you have any questlons concentlng this matter, please call thls
office.
Slncerely,
/fu12 -oz<
Ben Elmorc, EIT
BE/ilt{
box lfl)
veil, colorado 81657
{3031 47es613
department of community development
June 7, 1982
Craig Snowdon
201 Gore Creek Dr.Vajl, Colorado 81657 RE: DRB
Dear Craig:
0n June 2, 1982 the Design Revjew Board approved the pool
the caretaker's unit, and temporary site development sign.
wall height should be lowered to a maximum of six feet in
and no lighting for the temporary sign is included in the
approval . The entrance gate is to be approved at a later
Si ncerely,
Submittal of 6-2-82
house,
The
hei ght,
Board 'sdate.
t1 '/,7--
Jim Sayre
Town Planner
JS:df
Prolect Application
Project Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
; tkl{4tr< u/tr
M{,t
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architecl, Address and Phone:
/ .-,
Legal Description: tot {P , Block -/ , Filing
Coroments:
1
Design Review Board
DISAPPFOVALAPPROVAL
BE$TCOPY
hwn
75 south tronlage rd.
vall. colo.ado 81657
(303) 476-7000
January 25, 1982
Craig Snowdon
201 Gore Creek Dr.
Vai l, Co'lorado 81657
Dear Craig:
This letter is to confirm that my
gross residential floor area for
Condominium Project comprised of
caretaker's unit show a tota'l of
I
department of community development
calculations of the ProPosedthe 770 Potato Patch Drive
30 units plus one on-site
56,126 square feet.
I would also like to remind you that the final Design Review Board
approval is still pending the submittal of a title report for theproperty. It is understood that the design of the pool house'
iooi area, and entry gate will be reviewed by the Design Review Board
prior to the issuance of any building perm'it for that area.
If you have any questions, p'lease contact me.
Peter Jamar
Town P'l anner
PJ:df
t'o
chen and
CONSULT
a ssociates, i nc.
ING ENGINEERS
SOI L & FOUTIDATI (T{
CIIIGINEERI G
j
5080 RD. 154 .GLENWOODSPRINGS,COLORADO 81601 r 303/945-7458
SOIL AND FqJilDTiTICb{ I}I\ESTIGATIOI{
PROPOSD MULTI-FAI,ILY DE1/ffiOPMEI\II
IC{' 6 Bi-€i( 2, \IATLIPCrIATO PASGI
\AIL, @IORAM
kepared For:
It4r. John Thcrnas
P.O. Box 696Vail, CO 81657
Job Nc. 23,029 Decsnber 3, l98l
OFFICES gENvEn. COt3EADO I COIORADO SPRINGS. COLOnAOO .' CASPE R. WYOtlrtNG / SALT LAI(E CITY, UTAH
o o
{
IAS.,.E @ Q\IIENIS
mrcx!slors
S@PE
moPGED CO\SITI,CTIOI{
SIIE CCTIDITICNS
g.rBsort @iDrrrchts
GRCXJIID I'AftR CCDiaAOL
FC[.i:iDHCiCEi Rffi.FEIOATICUS
SOPES AI{D REfAINITG SIFjCTI'RES
I;NUERDRAE.{ Sl'Si5!,i
:IMR SI,ASS
SI;FA3E DRTI}GG
ll.lTlitICX.lS
]ICTIRE 1 - IClflICbI G IES'I PrIs
fIGJRE 1A - GRCJ}D ISIIIER.
:IGJRE 2 - I.MS OF'TEST PIIS
rIGIiE3.LreD&}DIE
!'IGJRES 4&5 - SI{ELITONSOI,IDAIICN IE9I RESIjLTS
FIGJFE 6 . GRADATICII lEgT RESULTS
TABLE I - Sul,Itli'SY 0F IASRAIORY TES'I RESUIf,S
I
2
2
2
3
4
4
6
I
8
8
€[iT.,,uslols
(1) Su.lcsoj-l conditicns are erratic ard gnerally consist of lcr,'rer
bearing sards orrerlying coarse granular sulcsoils. ShaIIcm grourd
water exists c'ver al-out 508 of t}le site.
(2) The proposeJ structu.e should be fcnrdeal with spread footings
extended through aU, tpper softior rret silty sards ard designed
for a rnaiilua soil bearing pressure of 2500 psf. Ccrpact€d stn:stural
fill nay be req'uird in areas of sh,al1o" grot$d !,ater. In dr:f areas,
q>read footilgs rnay be placed on the upper sands and designed for a
-.-.: I r ----_:.- . ----l,r(.lJi'-s!.t|lri s(Jrl. !€<rr-L lg iJl.Csb|jrC 9t rVrJU P!jt.
(3) Derratering dulng crrilstrustion and installalion of pe::ranent drairnge
si'stes=.rs v,'iil be re'qi:iled irr shallcpr gr.or-uld r.ater areas. Other
design details and precautj-ons are discr:ssed belcw.
-2-
SOPE
Ttris report presents tJre results of a soil ard forsdation investigation
for tlre proposed developrent on Iot 6, Block 2, Vail/?otato Patch, Vail'
Eagle Ccr:nty, oolorado. Tire report presents tte reccrmended forrdation
type, allo,rabLe soil bearing pressures. subsoil alrd grot:nd water conditions
i,and other qeotech.nical related d,esiqn and constrrrLion details.i'' Ciren and lrssociates previcusly onducted a preliminarl soil and
iorr-rdation irrvestigation for the subject develognent reported unCer our
Job }tc. 14,059 ard dated Januaq/ L0, 1977. Inforrnation contajled !'tithin
+j:at report has be--r: utiLized as back-gr:o:rd infor:rn+-ion and to -c'-4p!-erent
thi s repor-t.
?RC?CS:D CC];STFJCIION
lle ulde::steni that t-he proposed cons'iJ-.Jctior'.,,'i-11 co:rsist of 2 to 3
sto{', nuLtj--fanil,1' frare rnite- Fowrdation loaij-ngs e-re assurcd to be
relat:r'el1' light. Retaired cut depttrs belcw tle groutd surface are
e*?ectei *-o i= on tlre order of 8 feet rna-\cilrnlr. Slab-o:-graCe censtruction
is p:cp:seci for lornrer- floors arrd in parking ar@s. If Cesign plans are
sigaifica::tly differerrt frcrn tbose descrjled, tJrj-s cffice shoufd be
rctified for re-eraLultion of reccnnendations.
SITE M}DITIOTiS
At the tfue of our field inrrestigation, tlre lot was undeveloped and
apparal in si"rilar crcni.liLioa to that rnten previonsly :.rircstigatai.
'"'cr;'c-ralir:il sovc.i: '-on5lstal of l.f,tj.i'e gl?sses, rrrels a:''c 93.q3 i::JEh.
Scattered Aspen trees and heaqy' bnrsh r,rere located prinarillz along ttrc
o
-3-
soutlern border of tle lot wittdn a drairage area. Tte drairnge dranrel
itself ag)ears to harre been relrcated 80 to 90 feet rr,rest of its natural
lo,;ation on ttre r4per portion of tte lot. lrtater was flor^rirlg at tlte tirre
of tte field investiqation. Occasional boulders to about I0 foot size r,'ere
rcted h t}re area.
Topographically, tlre sj-te slopes dqon to the soutfi wtere a very
*eep, 2:l (tnrizonta-l- tc \rertical) grade, or steeper exists along the
south border of ttre lct. fne site is surrorsrded to the north, west ard
south by Fotato Pairch trrive and to the southeast by hew mrlLi-fanrily
'.rnits. A 20 f@t wide utility eassrcnt transects the 1ot frcra the east
to tne rtest near '.-ne south centrai mrtion <.rf the site.
Is-i.soi], coNDrfrcNs
I
The subsoil ccncii-tions '^€re in,'estirrated b1' er:carlatrng 6 e.rplcratory
pits at the appro.':irate focatj-cns slror,:r on F igure I. Previous test
pits axcavated for our prelimila:i' i:rvestigation are also shc'rrn on
:igure 1. Graphic logs of tle s':L-'soil profiles ar:e presented on FiEure
?. In general , dre subsoil profiJ.e r,arieC sl:gh-tli'. kl-o,s a tol:scil layer,
ioose si1t1, or clai.el- sands, to a na*ilu: Cepth of B feet, r\:cre encgunterd
.lri:rerily w"ith-in tlre north and central poticns of the lot. Dense silty
sards and g:r:a','els rnere found to r.r'rderlie the upper sands and were enc.or:ntered
near surface (about 4 feet or less) or,'er tfre rsrainder of the site.
Cobb1es and boulders to a rr:_-jrun 48 inch size r,rere encountered in the
test pits and becane nDre nunerous u'ittr depth. The crcarse granular subsoils
b€re enoountered in all pits to the maxinam depth a'plored, 12 feet. SvEtl-
consolidation tests perfoi:rr,ec on tlpi.cai sirriJ>ies of thc t:ppcr sancs and sanci
rn:trjx are presented on Figures 4 arxl 5 ard ildicate tJre imterial to
-4-
possess a roderate to }r.igh settlsent potential r47on loading ard uetting.
Frgure 6 presents tlre results of gradation analyses perforned cl.r tte rninus
3 tc 5 ilch fractj.on of the underlying @trse granular deposit, A
s'JrrriEry of laboratory tes-uing is preserrteJ on Tabie I.
Free r.later was en@L!'rtered in Test Pit 4 at tlp tirrc of ttre field
i:ivestigation. Previous wcrk irr l;tre area indicates that growd wa@r
i:ay be wittr-in 2 feet of tlre gro'und surface jn the central portlon of the
site. Figr:re 1A', stum tle approxirrete area of shallcr'r grrowrd water. In
I
general, ij:e sr:csoils encouni€refl jl i;he pits outsicle the ljmits of tllis
aea toere sliqhtlv trcist to n:ist,
G?C-nrD leER CO'ITFOL
i
Shal-l-o.v g:ouni l'=,te: d.epth occ-lrs within abcut 50i cf Lie site-
a\tens i'"'e tnierC:aina;e rrill .o:oirabl-y Lc required to penrii- t builcii::g and
:ca**a! construction i-:r rlis area. A seri.es cf *.:::erc!: Craj:rs cormectd
iith slotted pige ItEi'prc"e xrf,st feasible. l€ reccx;.rrend the systan be
;-^!^1r^^ -- ^--r" i'1 tle constructicn ses,uence as possible tc facilitate
-:DeG-IE\,-
qli: (:CLL l-Y .r-l I L- s \-\Jr ri' (J- U\- !.JU. r Jt -
:f-\'Ii. trr. in aCCition to '"he --:ench q'stet, bLan::et Cra:-.-:s or lntcri c:'
:ui!.eng lateraLs IrB)' be re.:r.:ired. A1 L drairs shouid d:1'lighc b1' gravitl'
ilo.,r. lb will be at'ail-able to revis.nr &:airage plans upon reguest.
.:!{"\DATI ON Rrcq\$MJDINIONS
Considering tfle soil t14:es ercrcu'rtered in tie anploratory pits, we
re'qmend the proprosed structures be fourded v:itJ, spread footings e-xtended
th:o.:qh the upper organic topsoils arxl placed on ttre Lonaer sands ard
gravels or ccr -maeted str.rctura]- fiII. In crry Areas ' tirc f-ooLinqs nay be
placed on t}le rppe:: siltlz sands. Settler{Ents are estirnated at I inch n"raxirrurn.
(8)
(e)
-6-
A soil engireer stpuld inspect ttre footing e:<caration to verify tle
above reco.nerdalions.
A11 exterior footirrgs should be provided with adeguate soil crcver for
frost protection.
SIOPES At{D RETAI]']N}3 SIFUCTIJRES
Heights of r:nretajled q,rt and fill slcpes should be kept as lor^r as
possibie. Gerrerally, any rannade slopes exceeCilg about 15 vereical
feet sho'ui-C be stuclied on an ildil'i<1i:a1 basis. Slopes should be prctected
frcrn surfacre \aater nnroff anC seepage by constructj.on of berlns' diversion
. :----.,r ---l(JldlUIej-S UI. LlId-U rb. iid5 LS [J<lL t.e UJCLI- rv !l+!l. |.d]IL L-r 1I U(1YI l{-ru L Ll lc
ce:tral pcrtr-on of the site r,r*rere sirallo* grrcunC water and surface flow can
pe opected.
T:. c*or=ry>r ql.^r-t'-^--j,ng a::eas, we rec?n.F:ld the use of retaining stJuctt:res
-"o :ira-:rtai:r a nra-r,im.ri sJ-o1e i-rchiation of 2 : i (irori zontal- "o
verticai ) .
Retaining walls rrtrich can lrrdergo a noderate afiplxtt of iptiorr shculd be
Cesigned tc resist lateral ea---uh pressures based on an eguivalent fluid
r..eignt o5 35 pcf. Buili-ng foundation walls should be designed for 40
pc:. These pressures assurTe granular bad<fil-l havjrg a near horizontaL back'
slope a::C dra-inage of fr-ee wat--r to pre!'ent buildup of hltirostatic
pressures. Drairnge can be acconplisheci by constrr.rcting urderdrails irt
tl're badcfili- and placing a free Craining material irl a zone at least 2
feet tlLiC< irrrirediatel)' bahind tlre rnel1 or by construcb.ing the walls with
cobles sucfl as for crib wal-ls or gabions. Any surclrarge trxessures frcrn
srol loads, slopilg backfiil, parking, builoings, stad<ed retaining walls
etc., must ip a&it-<i io ij re aix.l,e ciesigr r plessules.
-7-
Base friction on the footings of 0.3 tj:rcs t}e rprnral force and
passive earth pressures based on an egu:ivalent fluid ueight of 400 pcf
can be used to resist sl. idilg ard overtuming. Passive eart}r pressure
strould be reduced by 50'5 if a lxrcyant ordition exists.
L'\9ERDP.AT\- SYSTEI4
In addition to gro'.:nd water contrbl as previously discussed, rrle
:
reccnr,end a for-rrdation drain systen be'utilized to protect all belcur
grade levels of the brrj-1di-ngs. Tte rnderdrail shcu.J-d consist of a
perforated drain pipe installed irt a grarrel filled trench. The trench
shr,''r:ld be at_ l_east l_ fo,lf be ldt,/ l cr!.Fst ad_'iaeent finished level. Tre
drain U-ne stpuld slope on a nr-inirnnr iB grade to a suitable g=avity outlet
or pui:3.
FI.I]OR SLr"gS
Tne natr:ral soi-1s at the site exch:sive of the upper orga:ric soils
ani,/or soft silty sa:rds are capabl-e of srppor-+-ilg lightly loaded floor
slabs. Slabon g:raCe floors shoulC be separatel fron Lcaring r.ernbcrs
v,j-tl'l a positive expansion jolnt and shouLd be adequat€l-v rreinforceC.. A
nd-nj-mLl,l 4 inch layer of free drainirg gravel should be pJ-aced beneath
the slabs to distri-bute floor loads and aici jr subsurface dralnage
if reguired. Ttris underslab gravel should be ocnnected to the underdrain
Sj"st€ln.
uFper soft silty sards or sardy silts enocuntered at slab grade
shoul-d be rs:or,'cd anC replaceC mnpcted to 95t standard Pre-tar density
.-:1. :.r :.:v-,ri.:.1-tr:r. rrrn1-nnl- nn:rr a,.i-iv'rn rTt}.r.r lrry-.q i !-1r i,;r;19* Ui-a:fUl a:: SOiIS ffge
of oversized rock can also be use<l as backfill. organic soils should be
cfirpletely rsroved.
-8-
g.]RFAG DRAI}GG
Ite follcning drailage precautions shoul-d be obsenred durirrg constnrctiqt
ard rTaintained at aII tinr:s after tlre struetures have been ccrrpJ.eted:
(f) S<cessirie wetting or dryjng of the fouedati-on e<cavation stpuld be
avoidoC durirg oonstnrction.
(2) l'liscellaneor:s backfill arourd, tlre structures should be nrristenecl
I
lEnd copacted Lc at least 90* of stardard Proctor density.
(3) fne grould surface surrolrdJrtg tJre exterior of the strustures
shcul<i be slo1:ed to drain away in all directicns. A rni"nJrn-m slcpe
of 6 inches il tlre first 10 feet is reccsmerded.
(4) Rmf dora:spouts ard drahs sbo'.rld cischarge r"e.11 beyond tlre lirrLits
of ali badrfill-,
r.:iGTio\s
This repot nas been prepared in accordance w'itfi generally accepted
scil anC foundation engi::eering practices il tris area for +-he use b1'
'.-he client fcr oesign p'urposes. The cc:clusions and recrcnnendatio;rs
s'.ibritted j-n this report are Lnsed upon the Ceta obtained frcrn the test
pits et:cav'ated at the locatic::s indicacal c:: the test pit plan. the
natrire and e}teat of valiations betr,'een tl,e test pits ney not beconE
evident rnlil excar,ration is perforned. If during oonstruction, soil and
grorrxi water cpnCitions appear to be different from those descri-bed
-...-t o
-9-
herein, this office should be ad\rised at q'6:e so that rrernluaLjon of
tle reocnnendations rnay be nade. I€ resurrerui qFsite obsenraliOn Of
exca'lrations and fouondation bearfuq stxata by a soil engineer.
GIB:I AIO ASSCIAIE9, Il.lC.
Revielrcd By
Rfrldccc: SncnpCer & itcpkirs
u-
i'
IF
t.
itnll:jrF
t..lcrt-.
-IFt'a
n
*z
ttt c
F
o
c<t
.,-r srt ol+J ta
oo -
r(Ji
F
*t
o
xtl
AF{
z-
g.l/i/F,
Lo4Fc-
t-
,ut"l
I
o
J
o
*r
F
Fa-
!<o
or,1e
<1
to.r{
I
F
c)
qr Q)OP
c=
a)ti 1,<g
C,OP $.1
F.A 7ixoOF.tr Fr
<.n
oo
tt, o
..r Oc, ia
F
tr<
..< r.t 0rpu)(! co(J c.,
JLJ-.
o+)
F
z-o t, tlo
O- -rA<t
a.l
Fo4FCL
F"""a
kro
/i
,/ i,
/t ,r'J:,%t".
o
tl
rrl
u(fF
F
Fo
ll i;
i
,ll\
' ,];I
EI,EVATION'- FEET
{.tr,tr
C)Nta
rm
6ttl
Ut
@(rl@U1
(,r
ltl :F't!t!Favr -l
olt F
F'FtvOo FlUr F,
h)t, z\)
j
Ffll.*OIJrNN
t.Nootl
ul
,58f;o$ tloroSll 5.N. {,\t t^
:Fg*Irlts(rlFiOlnNF.JJ-{
.tt
-|
tl
oulN. lrr
@l''rNC)
@tl
(n
@tl
o
@l/lo(n
It
-|
!
!
.l
tr
!
{
o\
'
-t
s
J
1.'
.{
an
I
T
f.J
l:,..r 'i'tl
i,r j l;
EI,EVATION - FEET
EI,EVATION - FEET
-,Fl'oo'ot'
fiiflSand (SM), silty, occasi<inal gravels and cobtrles, clayey sand layers, loose,
_tfflslightl)'noist to net, dark bmvn.
f.QtGravel (GM-SM), sandy, silty to clayey, occasional cobbles or boulders to l4
ffi foot size, nediun dense, slightly mist to ret,'dark brown.
'l
b t ndisturbed tland Drive Sanple iti
ll
n Disturbed Bulk SanpleL'_l
r-,,,a.1,!- =- Depth at nhich free water vas encoutered at the tine of excavation.
:
!.IOTES:
- l) Test pits nere excavated on october 8, l9gl with a backhoe.
, ?:::r;i;ltrit"
approximate and were estinated for contours on plan provided
3) h'C = ltiater Content (e;)
DD = Dr), Density (pcf)
-200 = Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve '
LL = Liquid Linit (',")
PI = Plasticity Index (lo)
t2s,oje LEGEND q'-iidfui' Fig. 3
percanl
pcl
feet
tfrr attu aJJt Ll.lr.,ri rlrL. O
gcistura Content . 4.7
Ory Unit weight ' 94 . 5
S.mple ol: silty sand .
ti
rronr: Test Pit 2 at
. dp .0
I
coqat_ _ -',lU,ot'o-Fto..(J
3
4
5
6
7
8
Fig. .. .4 -
--
SWELL.CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
9
l0
ll
12
15
14
15
16
#23,O29
APPLIED PRESSURE - KSI
cfrr at., 's:i,criltcsr tlc. O
t.0 t0
APPLIED PRESSURE - KsI
$
nfv
t
trO1+llctulotr?z.o (J
J
4
5.
6
,7
I
9
l0
0.r 100
Hoisttrro Content = 9.1 gorcont
Dry Unil WGight 'l l1 . 7 gcl
S.mpl6 ot: clayey sand ,,
From: 1gs1 Pit 2 at 7 feet
fi
r
I
)
r2s,0z9 SWELL-CONSOLIDATION T€ST RESULTS Fig r
cA-2-7g'
a
o
hen and associates, inc.
HN. 7 HR.tN 15 MlN.
0z
A.
z()culc
o
=
zul|Jat
o.
60 MtN. t9 Ulll.r MtN. I MtN
CLAY TO SIIT
GRAVEL 36 %
LIOUID LIMIT
SAMPLE oF silty
'rm '50 'ao'r
u2
OIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILrJ|/|ETERS
o
z
FUJarFz
oGul
70
80
90
127 |
r52
sANo 49 % s{-r ANo GLAY 15
J,o %PLASTICITY ]NDEX
I
sanci G' eravel FFroNl Test Pit I
%
at l0 feet
'IME7HRl5 Mltr 60 M'I 19 MrN I MIN
r S STANCARO
2aa5
ltB.'5o '.0 '33 '16
a r49 .297 | 590 1.19
z
F
50.EF
60()
A
70
u2
DTAMETER OF PABTICL€ IN MILLIIETERS
CLAY TO SILT
G8AVEL 38 * seno Sii rr s[-r ANo cLAt 24
LreurD LtMrT 2? cb PLASITCTTY llro€X 5
s^nPL€ oF silty sand.6 gravel rrnr Test Pit
n
5 at l0 feet
#25,029 FigGRADATION TEST RESULTS
127 |
r52
ir
I
t
6l
dE.E
a
a,
(!h
D.
ar5
cC'ul
+J
o
EGrt
.F
v.
c(6o
0)
o
q)
lr
sJ
c0o
.J
th
B!-
EEg'
t!E.:
J
atI
a3
'
F(, |||=;9Ua-Jf
rn ln
O;,
g:E c{to e.lt\I
lsEe;'frieo la F-s(..1
z
;
o
a.'
;d 6r
=r4
Jis
o
r4 oo14
i=rc
ln
€
F-
r{
-rP r-<=r
;3:E:1 .,
tr-
s
2;
I
cI
J'
!!o r.l F-
I
I
III
L
F c\I |n
c|t\lo
Irtel
oz,
o
a,
F
:)
ct)
liU
E
rl.'
6,
ul
F
z
ala
o
E
o
(l
:)
U)
o
chen and
C O N S U LT I
tolt & touxornoil t6 s. zuNl . oEilvER. colon^oo t0223
lxG lxll lllG 102tt casr FlRsr srnEET . castEn, wYoulllc 12601
PREL II{ IITARY
s0l t AND FoUNDATrolt rNvEsTlGATl0N
FOR A XULTI-FA}tILY OEVELOPhENT
LoT 34, 8L0CK I Al,tD Lor 6, BLoCK 2
POTATO PATCH SU8OIVI SION
VAIL, COLORADO
Prcparcd for:
PIERCE, ERIIIER AND FITZHUGH SCOTT
vArL, coLoRADo 81657
associates, inc.
NG ENGINEEFS
303/r.a-t105
307t23/.2124
Jenuary lO. 1977Job t{o. | 4059
oo
TAILE 0F C0irTfxTs
. coilclusloNs I
SCOPE 2
PROPOSID CO}ISTRUCTION 2
stTE coltDlTlor,ts
suBsott coNDlTtofls 3 .
FOUNDATIOII RECOI{XENDATIO}IS 3
'I
RETAINIHG STRUCTURES : II
| ,,r, n*o,un ; q
I
SuRFAcEDMTNAGE I : j
UNDERDMIIIS 5
' lrfscELLANEous 6
FIG. I - LOCATION OF TEST PITS
rj
FIG. 2 - LOGS OF TEST PITS I
,l
FIG. 3 - LEGEI{D AIID IIOTES
FIGS. ,I THROUGH 6 . SI{ELL.COTISOLIDATIOII TEST RESULTS
F|GS. 7 THROUGH ll - GMDATloll TEST RESUTTS
TABLE I . SU'II{ARY OF LABOMTORY TEST RESULTS
coilclus | oils
(l) The arca ls sultablc for thc proporcd constructlon of multi-frmlly
dnell Ings.
(2) Thc subsolls gcncrally conslst of 0 to 6 fcct of loosc, sllty sand
overlylng medlum densc sllty sand and gravcl. Bcdrock was not cncoun-
tcrcd In any of thc tcst plts.
(3) The most sultabte foundatlon typc would bc sprcad footlngs placed on
thc sllty sand and gravel solls and &slgned for naxlmum soll prcssures i
, ,n thc range of 1,500 psf to 21500 psf.
I (tt) Frcc water wer cncountercd In 3 of our tcst plts Indlcatlng thc nced
for shallo{ Gonltructlon and/or undcrdraln systcns In thcse rrcas.
-2-
SCOPE
Thls report prescnts thc results of a prcl lmlnary soll and foundatlon
Invcstigatlon for proposed multl-famlly dwelllngs at Lot J4, Block I rnd
Lot 6, Block 2 of the Potcto Patch Subdlvlslon,. Val|, Colorado. ltost
ssitablc foundat lon types, a range of allo+rable soll pressures, lratcr tablc
conditions and other soll related dcslgn detalls are dlscusscd.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
lle understand that the resldentlal unlts in thls area src to bc of tno
to three-story f ranre @nstructlon wfth partlal garden lcvel concrcte bascmcnt
parkl.ng structurcs. ltodc ra t€ col urnn loeds typical of such constructlon arc
anticlpated. Slab-on-grade constructlon for lower floors and parklng arcar
ls antlclpated. Intcrlor rctalnlng wal I typc structurcs of one story and
as hlgh as 2 storlcs are antlclpatod on the uphlll sldc of sonrc of the
bulldings.
SITE CONDITIONS
At the tlme of our Invcstlgatton, both lots $,crc vaclnt. Soll covcr
conslsted of grass and r*ccds wlth aspen grovcs. The ground surface slopcs
down moderatcly to stceply to thc southeast, The maxtmum dlffcrcnce
lcross the slte ls about 90 fcet end betwecn 8 and 30 fcct across any onc
structure. A small knoll oqcurr In thc castcrn part of Lot 34 and thc
rlopc ls rnore gcntlc herc and to thc cest. Thls gentlc slope on thc r',cst
sldc of Lot 6 has. swampy rrea wlth standlng watcr and a smell crcek.
Potato Patch Drlvc and sonc utllltlcs had bcen conttructcd. Road cuts
havc created stecp stopes. Sonr retalnlng walls had bcen constructcd for
thcrc. A hourc lr to 5 yGtrl old occurt on Lot l0 to thc ccrt. lt rppcerl
to bc In good condltlon frqn r foundetlon polnt-.oJ vlcr.
-3-
suBs0tL coNDtTt0N
Thc subsoll condltlons rcross the sltc wcrc falrly unlform end conslstcd
gcnerally of 0 to 6 fect of loo.rc, silty sand overryrng mcdrum dcnsc silty
sand and gravel wlth numerous cobblcs ond some bouldcrs. Bedrogk was not
cncountcrad In any of our tcst plts, Test plts g and ! ln Lot 3t, Block I
Ihavc a thln lgycr of topsor r ovcrlylng thc medium dcnsc aravcls. LocatlonI
.nd Logs of thc Test plts lre shown In Flgs. 1,2 and J. Srvell-consolldatlon
tcsts on typlcal samplcs of thc sllty sand and gravet arc shoryn ln Flgs. 4
through 6. Thc rcsults of thcrc tcstr lndlcete that thc matcrlrl docs not
gossess a sr*ell potcntlal, but rathcr_consolldatcs on loading end wcttlng.
Gradation tcst rcsults on typlcal sarytes of the sllty sand and gravel erc
rhorrn In Flgs. 7 through ll.
Free watcr xas cncountcred In 3 of our test ptts durlng our Invcstlgatlon
rt dcpths of ll to 6l fcet. Thcsc 3 tcst plts 6re locatcd ln thc wcstcrn
portlon of Lot 6, Block 2 In thc swlmpy !rca.
FOUNDAT ION RECOI{HENDAT I ONS
Eascd on thc prcl lmlnary tcst lnformatlon, we bel feve thc Dost deslrabls.
and. safe typc foundatlon r.rould bc sprcad footlngs placcd on thc lorer sllty
sind and gravel solls and desrgncd for soil pressurcs In the range of
2'000 to 4,000. psf. Pleclng thc footlngs on thc lovrer coarsc araincd solls
rhould bc fcaslble glnce molt of thc foundatrons wilr rcqulrc cut3. lf lt
ls ncccssary to place footlngs rt a hlgher clcvetlon, thcy may bc placcd on
r nlnlmum of thrce fcct of ccnpactcd flll. Thc flll may consfst of thc
uppcr loose sllts rcnrovcd rnd rccompactcd to l00t standard proctor dcnrfty.
Footlngs placcd dlrcctly on thc uppor loosc rllt rhould bc dcrlgncd for lon
prcssurct - on thc ordcr of |,000 prf.
o
-q-
Contlnuous foundatlon wrlls should bc rclnforccd top and bottom to
3pan rn unsupportcd lcngth of l0 fect. Foot Ings should be placcd belout
frost depth. Frost dcpth of 48 to 60 Inchcs ls corrrcnly used.
RETAIN ING STRUCTURES
The uphlll walls of the structures should be deslgncd as retainlng
xalls to retaln carth of an equivalent fluld rvelght of 35 pcl . lf thc toc
of thc wall is morc than 3 feet belorv the ground surface, passlve eprth
prcssure can bc consldercd effcctlve and should be calculated on the basls
of rn equlvalcnt flutd nclght of 400 pcf. The r.relght of thc Aranular
backfill wlll bc approximately 130 pcf. A hosc draln ls nccessary behlnd
such walls.
i
I
S ITE GRAD ING
Extenslve site gradlng is proposcd, although excesslvc depth of cut
end flll ls not expectcd. As wlth any hlllslde sltc, lt ls vcry lmportant'
to cxcrclse caut ion In pcrformlng cxcavations. Temporary slopes on the
order of l:l should bc stablc. Permanent slopes whlch are not rctalncd
should bc no steeper than 2:l and prefcrably flattcr to facllltate revegeta-
tlon. lf seepage ls encountercd In thc cuts' such condltlons should be
Inspectcd by a cornpetcnt soll cnglnecr to determlne what rcnredlal measurcs
mlght be requl red to Insurc slope stablllty. Shal low groundwatcr €ncountGrGd
In Tcst Plts l, 4 and 5 Indlcatcs that such scepagc can bc expccted In
thcsc arcas and cutr should not bc dcep herc.
Cautlon should bc.uscd In pleclng fllls. Thc around surfacc should bc
3trlppcd of vcaetrtlon.nd should bc bcnchcd prlor to placlng thc flll.
-5-
All flll should bc ccnp.ctcd'to at lcast 9Ot standard Proctor dcnrlty.
Flll bclou the f loor rfab arcrs In partlcular should bc wcll conpacted to
prcycnt futurc scttlqrnnt. Prlor to placlng flll bclovr floor slabs, the
natural solls should be scarlflcd, nolstcned and compacted. Placenent of
flll should not block natural dralnage ways.
SURFACE OMINAGE I
Thc natural drainage on thc cxlstlng hlllsldc is good to fair In the
swampy arca. lt ls vcry |rportolt that after construction all dralnage bc
dircctcd away from the bulldlngs. Sonre of thc solls arc susccptlble to
rplsturc changes and lt l: hnportant to provldc aood surfaec dralnage. In
addltlon, thc follovlng deslgn and constructlon dcttlls should be obscrved
both durlng and aftcr constructlon: i
I
. (l) Exccsslvc rrrettlng or drytng of the foundation cxcavatlon should be
avoided durlng construct lon.
(2) Eackflll around thc bulldlngs should be nolstcnsd and cornpacted to rt
lcast 853 standard Proctor dcnslty.
(3) The ground surface surroundlng thc cxterlor of the bulldlngs should bc
sloped to drtln away fron thc bulldlngs In all dlrectlons.
(tt) Roof downspoutr and drrlnr should dlscharge wcll bcyond thc llmlts of
all backflll.
UIIDERDM INS
Shallor frcc watcr ryas cncountercd In Tcst Plt I and lbovc bascmcnt
lcvcl In 2 othcrs. lf thc lorpr floor lcvcl of . structurc Is to be
rfthfn 2 fcct of thc Aroundwatcr trblc, an undcrdrlln rystcm rhould bc
Inrtrllcd rround thc p.rln3tcr of thc bulldlng to ProtGct thet lo|tcr
lcvcl.
o
-6-
il I SCELLANEOUS
Thls rcport ls prcl lmlnary ln nature. lt ls posslblc that crratlc
subsol I condltions may cxtst bctwccn thc wldely spaced tcst plts. ue
recommend that furthcr Investlgrtlon bc pcrfornred by thc dl99 lng of addltlonrl
test plts Prior to excavatlon or the lnspcct lon of the foundatlon'excavatlons
aftcr they have becn.opened. Any ptaccment of flll should be tcstcd for
;'proper conpactlon. ve wlll be ovallablc to perform such Inspectlons or to
'discuss thc results of our rcport lf thcre are any questlons.
CHEN Al{D ASSoC IATES , I lrc.
RcvIa.rcd
JDF/mbr
!- E6 !ilD:
t*
si lty, with so,.:re cobb lesdark b rown.
-o
and bou l ders, r.,ediu:l dense,
gravel, fine t; coarse sand,moist, b rntrn to dark brown.
T.r2sci l, send,
sl ight ly :rcist,
Sand (S9-Sil) , clean tclocse ic nred ium dense,
sllty, occaslonat
s I ight ly mei st t.,
Sand and G rave IgradeC, loose tc
( Sl.t-Gfl), with bouldersnediun dense, moist to
and c bblcs, silty, sand wellsaturoted, brown.
b I nd icetAs drlvc samplc.
I
P I no i cstes bag sample.
i
-F lndicctes depqh to free water at thc tlnE
}TTiS:
(l) Tesi oits were axcavated on Dece,rbcr ZO,
(:) !levat icng are approximate and r,vc re takcn
(3) 'r/C = r,.'atcr Content (/,);t? = :11. Density (pcf);
-ZCC = :ercent lassini lio. 200 Sieve;i-L = Li:uid Limit (%) ;Pi = Fl;:sticity lndex;,llp = licnclost ic.
of excavatlon.
1976 with a backhoc.
from contour map furn I shed.
hend
L3G E$D A}ID iiCTES Fig- 3
|?
I
-E|tnl)
e
It,
0
2
4
6
8
t0
0
2
\
5
8
l0
l2
r3h
,l { ,059
CHEN AND ASSOCIATES
Al?LICO "rCtgulC - r.t
Srol l-Conrcl i&tion Tcrt Rerultr
tt
tuL
.JA
I
6
tto(,LAI6IJ
?{olurol Dry Unrt Wrrght - 75.3 Dcl
l{olu;ol Yoralura Conltnr - 40.8 Darct^r
pressldnuddcrl tlllr
ure du{ to iwettlTrg. 1 i i
i i I l!,ii;iiii:i!,:i
iiiii;
| !t
i I t, ilr;,i:ii
Typ I cja I
lolurol 0ry Uart l1re it . 87.7 cct
Loturot lorttera Coatrr,i . 6.0 9c'cr::?
PPLI gD FRESAUR E
Fle. 4
fxrN AND AssocrATEs O
o.0
a
E3rrtlyl
o,L9^6zL'
APPLI O PR E 36UF E - lrl
l{olutol 0rt Unrl
t{otutol Io' rt u?a
ress I od under I
ture due lto trcttlng. i
li
ln
W.'9rrt. 130.8
Conrr. i . 7.2
ress I on
ure d
Tvp I
de
wg
ap0
I
cJr
l)a^t'L'
t.ua??LlcD ttc ttulI
t0
- lr?
llolurol 0ry Unrl W.rght ' | 17. I oct
l{otu.ot Iorltrr?a Contanl ' 10.3 o.'ctnr
Slrrl l-Cmrcli&tion Tert Rcrullr Flg.5
|} HEN AN D Assoc tAr ES o
or to ro
APPLIE0 PiESSUnE ' lrt
Typlcal ramplc of rrnd frql Tcst Plt 8 at depth 6'-6".
Srcll - Con so li do I ion --Tcit.-*
Resulls
r.0
I
-ttor!|
,o
82(,
roo
Fle.6
Iolurol Dry Unrl Wrrglrl : lll.5 pct
NoturOl UorrluTt Conlrnl: l. I paf ccat
{dd I lo ta €sslon t rdc r
(t
qon 3 an rr 5 c due tr $et ln
(
\
\
, I l,o5g
lrr* rxo AsrocrlTrs O
Coruultira Soil ond foundotion Eng inooo
tcar a-r .rl rt
cr,tv rr.al'.c, to ltLt ra(l"ttallrcl
cravGL ll %
L rOulO Ll.a I r
saMrL: ot f Ine
wl th
otr ot0rrta t lt ot ,al !l ll Ir!!t(rl
t^f.o 59 % srLl aND cLAY 20
% tLlarrc I rY rigEx
to coarse tand ?roM Tcrt Plt I
occarIona| gravc l
coaa!tt
.7ci:Q
I.t depth 6t-0"
v I llrr0lr0 llr'10 lll__l r r tvtr!I I Cif.a louril ortirnOl..@ .!O ..dto ..
-::_-_:+ _- {
a.,l
lo
c
!a
I
I
Ia
I
a
!a
I
I
a
a
Ja .l tt
I
,.
at
It
I
ciavEr
L I oUlo
5AM?LI
2l % rr.xo $t %3rLr axD CLAY l7 7o
Lf r{f r 27.1 % rLA!rrcrry ri{orx 10.6 A
o. flnc to coar3c rrnd TroM Tcst Plt 2 et depth 8r-0"
wl th occ.r laral gravel
GRAoATIoN TEST. REST L-T+-* Fls. 7
C^
xt0l0rlrlr ltltYll vt I I lrvll
Di a r,a .(a- a- alr '-
v t tutDr.O ll.,llqc I Clfra leelt @(tr-ac .!@ .lJ..o.tc .a_ Fr .. _ \. !: t' t Jf
-i---F--+-+-l_ -- +_ _+ _.r.F:> -..--+--_, r ,-..+__.4l---- rF - Y -----.+ - -r
F-.-r---. -5 |.-{_-_
- ---r ---- -- +- -l-- -- -t-- -- -___1-_- --'----+-----.---+- ---_.+r_ .-l -'. r -::t--a:------r a*- -
:--1-= a----- 1 ----. + --F::-=:i:f -- .t- + .1
.--l
=*j-z:-:-i :--=::-li:{:-.-:I-=_ -l-
- i':- '.- .F'. -.-i:: l- ---- t''--I - -J_
- ---l -.-./a
-J--
--t.- .A'/7 |t - t.t- - t tt- -? .i-
- -- --t
'-_- -1--- _--1 '__t-__
f - -l
- -l
- 'f ' _1 - t
-'.-..t--:1 --+, -- 1
-_-'1. --i
il
_ it
'--'t
--:_=l
----+--:=-='.-' -. ,l ..J-
' -t-:._l;']-'- rl - -- t-- .---J.-{'
n 3oa @r o.r oti c'. ,.a ttr ^l-t o ,r ^ilr. .tr tta ,r t. rrt ,iiT r,o'rltltr or rtrlitlt r: r'(lfritrf rr rI
C!ty ttr.at(r t0 lrL? |rq-.!.lt.Ct colaL I I
,t4,o5g
HTN
Corurltirp
ArsocrAr:3
FernJotion Enginom
ANO
Soil and
Cra ra lOu
a.d .aa a- a at ' -.r .,@ .ro..o.r
slxo .52 % 3rL?
% :raatrc t ?Y
Ito coarSe Sand 7roM
occailonal gravcl
I lt oln
%
Plt 3 rt
cOllrtl
!
at
It
I
a
!it
I
I
a
a!
at
It
C!lV tr.atrCr ?O lt!l tE-rLalrrCr
G.av€L 3\ %
L]OU I O !laat r'
saMFLr ot flnc
irl th
A'|.O CLAY
I rao: r
Tes t depth 8t-6"
C!lr t...tr'(l ?O llLt lE-t\.tr cl raaa! t I
orAvGL 32 % s^"o t6 tL trLr axo cusv ll %
lrouto LlLtY '/l ,LAlTlc.lYY lrtDEx *
sar.rLr or grtval ly rend TroM Tcct Ptt 4 rt dcpth 8r-0tt
Fl9. I
C ,
0'rrtrtr !a tl IrL!
u ! trri0rro ltr,ttt I c(lr. tcvata orftr-l.t(a r5 .rd tc .. 3 .. \' \' I r t. tla lar ala r-
q q o o't olr ct. ..a ttt l. s ' .a .illa .t all .4. I taa rator..ata.9r rrr ?itl t rl r'r!fJttt.r
,t{,059 GRADATION TEST RESULTS.-_ .*..
Cr exo AsrocrATrs
C-on&rlting Soil ond Fo.rndotion Erpinom
llr
ra. t.a I rrl!.1 aa.a tar
:
a
a
It
a
r3 !_- _- +__
=:-:l_:--, F--. ?
-a r-- a<b
- ---.,a F-- -'._ -a '' _ . 'l.--_ _ - --, ; :.
i rL--. -t---i l. :-"
I f -- - . ..-x_i-
---
li--. -.{- -
l- i
rol.--r-F-- .F 'l.- - + --.o[-:-- *:]'&@r
I
to
ao
t!|
F
a
ta;
IriI
I
Or^rt t t a
C\lt rtrrlr( tO lrLl '.O.trall,Ct
6FAV€L 36. Vc saxo 50
LfGf{J|o !f Mf ' %
!ar.tLt or !favel ly Sand
! I ll IrL!rtal
.[ srLr aro curv 14
Plaa Ttct rY txofx
..oM Test Pl t
%
%
5 et depth 9r-0"
Itr,tl Loo,
.l
I xY0r0JIfa, lilLytr!5 -;;-vEFrn6nat-
a
!a
I
I
a
a
Orl AVf L
(. loul o
zt 7,
LIr,IY
rer.o f,g %frLt ^,r.o cLav t9 %
% ,Ll3rrcrrY ixoe x A
07 flnc to coarlc tlnd 7ror. Tert plt 7 ct depth 6r-6r'yl th occarlonal grrve I
GRAOATION TEST' RESUL'TS_'Flg. 9
Ca ?
I xY0rOJlrat lilLYtr!5.-;;-Y'ErTn6nr-rr a a.a a. .. a-. g traiorl.,@ .to ..o. !a
t!ll
.flq.C\a rr tov.aa O.ar'-r -\'\'r'r'.J_ -t---
:=z.
LTJ 2:'- -:t, : -.:
a-_ .
r--F_-
e--- f ---..--.'.t- -.- . - .--4. --:--:'L:.--+ -,:--{*-*-._-'. ]' i - I ..- - .--t ___ .r-_r._- 'T_
f-i::: ::i::F:::-::i---J-j --J
--J:--.t-a---,1 --1- -: 1--- { .ir-.I. _.
T.[ -Ji -.
-l '1
'' 1
1..
- +----.
-=f::-:--=i't
-t -I -.- .t
:-=-t: -r ::::'.':--t.qa &a c! ctr ol0,rt1,,.'"o, rTCdf ,.',1..|X,'i...f " I I'r!t
c(tt:, ra'.(, to I !t .o,....tr.c,corlrtt
,l4,o5g
|c*tx exo Asso.,^r* O
Coruulliry Soil qd Foun&tim Eaginom
a
aa
I
I
a
a
a
IaI
I
I
I
t!
al
It
I
t:
aI
I
a
o.Av:L 56 7,
LtcUlo Ll14t r
sali.tt: or s!fidY
29 % srrY axo cLAV 15
tLat ttc I tY tiaDEx
rnoM Test Pl t
7o
%
7 at dcpth lr-Qrt
%
g rave I
CIAVI,L
LIoU'D
SAr.tLi
,l4,o59
6t % ra|r'
Lf xlt %
or 3andY grrvc I
GRAOATION
,0 % 3tLt axo cLAY 7 %
?LA!'ICI TY INO: I A
t.ot Tcst Plt 8 lt dcPth !t-6"
TEST RESULTS-* FlS.t0
c^ I
llo ' 't -Lla .l ll .1. I,DrrrtrCr Or 'rtfltLa rt rrL!fJ(rtrl
HYBtOttr I ltlt-Y!l trtvI lllLYlrl
.a. l.a I |tr .(.(,r.ilDl aa'a tc.- a- aDr ?ai s ! ttriDarD l(r'll.\cr) .r(p .to..a.r .a li Cr,lrr toerla O.ft'raaJ SJ[ :-:.
--+---.-J--._+::t:t=f-J--:--=I ---l+a-'-a----|-+.t-._-tJ==__{__ ,-_+_ _- -- F - - --+-- ----?- - '-
:_:a_.-_i
t - ---:+-r
_-:L
-l-l''---1 -: -! f-
-a .-- y _..
----.a + ''-- 11 -__
._r-.-'f:. l:L
_--E 4:'l-:::l ____l !__--:::--l=1 -a :t-l .- _l }- . ,lt-:'l -t-- -t - | - --{ -----{- -+ +.-
- t --- J----f-i *-
to-.:----l _: :l - --F:--l---l--t: t-- I tTt
t -- -r
tr-- --
.._ _+_ |'- ---1---- |
7_ t- lr r'r_rl
-r-{-t_-l - .-l
--_'!-.-_:
- !_
- -?':tl t_I
- 0,1 Olt OlOrlt
. I t''^l.'lF ,'l -ilra .i lI 'l' l' taa rarl a'!tt. ot trrfrtr.t 'r r'Lrlftrt.r 'rgtav rt .lr'<' tO ltll !rc-rr.tr,Cl @llrtl
a a'l
o
IrlI
I
I
o
!
I
I
Ii
a
!at
a
,t
a
I
a
a
3
a
@laral
orav€L
!lorJlo Lltal ?
5AM'LI c|F
7,%r%
% 3tLr a.ro cLAY
PLAirtctrY lr{of x
' 7lot.
Qr,* AND Asso.Ar* O
Corlulting Soil and foun&rion Enginom
ra- a rr 'lt
Ctlr tr..lr(r tO lrLl rro-a!.!t'Cl
GFAVEL. 65 % sa,.o 25
lfcfufo Lfrrrr $
3aMFLr or Sindy g rave I
% sr.-? axo cLAY
tLAa ?tc I TY txoEr
rroM Tcs t
lo%
%
Plt 9 at dcpth !r-0r'
Fl9. | |
c^ 7
0r.ra l C r ,T:?hf ,.',1..1 a rtfl
t{ YDro |' I t a trtLY!r!l!t Y_L !!l!!9!trl tll I i-|' .a.|;'rtata|| rai loar tt art L ! t traiolao lta at.\cc .,tD rF..dto .. Fa
frr
-
--a__--.F-
:- ---=-F:==-:F,-- -rt -- -.__ -l _-__ -r__r-l-::-j f--f-- -
t- -,r:=
.:-:
F:-::_T
- -- -F- - --._ !__._- -.-f
ts
ao
--+.--L
+---t
I
-_'t'-:r=
-1-'- ,l_-.-t-an @a ooa o.l ott or
or al lr..to, flffhf ,- ''l.,.lr!."rr.." ttr 'r' r' rrT-'-ir
c!ar ,, rt'.i ' r0 l'!t .o r\.tt c @aO! I I
, | 1r.059 GRADATION TEST RESU[T5
a!)
o: oto>: >l>at alaLILIL.el.e i(,.al.ol.att1rl!J!
vri u.,v,
cr clco ata
ol a>t >3l aLI LL!'i c,Cll t a:,
,"1 .
!l !cl ca!a6l u,
FCIOZ=Orrl|l,-Gl>g tt,Evt .ur<Oa3-z
|9 tJzt^
.=3rZs-oa(, o,
c93c;s!u urtct
: E E3
-l*l*l^l-. .l .t .r .r,\' Gt I O I f\r ctt\i -: cJ l€i -i-r-li-
4
3
q
oFJlo
u,c
F
FNIF:XE;-oo utF
: irt Fo
(AJElruo
tr
IIfo
lt.
\
r---)
( /'/
\\-I )"\
ryt/
m-t
K
o
ie
)
I{tI
I
I
II
l/!
,rffi/Tffil, \, \,; i\ i\ l=-<- \\r;l ih'.,\\\ ,.)
)
-, )t))f )rr) --T;i i7..../..J{ft(ry'\i,/J
\/'
\:fi1_q
\\
\
\
\
IIrl
O
\
oa)_ \(lotl(J:
t/.t _o\
cr
.;:
o
?:cr\.)
ct
F\
cf.r
aIl
(c
041 -.IItt c,Tc)(r(\l.-fl
rn c,.T\ Or\'l' -?cc <n
t .r^F o\Cril.- ..'\ t \-.OnF\ . . !tt\-ocJd) t"f\ oI ||oI i I o(J .:GI-J. LtN
=Cr | -l(l =
|
C)C)rncn
cn..c)
N- a-{ Sttri(rO.-t->c|.Je.
or-
cu
o|.\
@
F
t-
g,
F
Ir.:
No\h.:l€n+, ll
o.-trt
-tq)\O.$co+., u
lr,
.+\o-- t/\ .3cotl
o-Fl!
- () oJ
lt\ tt o- F\ !
-o:: Foxol ,o(Jt\r - t) Ga3rc-lsl
or.r\.:f@
tt\
..'o)
13l.J - 1.10 lIvA3'll
rtrr\
q)
tt\t\
-jl('r',
C)(o..t(Y)
(o
(o
oo\
co
rort\ocr('rr-'.\ tr\ JCOOco
,. <)()(O .|Y\F.ll .L .ll.no:: - <,llo ll ll c)!r (\l -,. |', (\l:r | fi-' :i I
o
at\@
r(no . - f.r 1\l t'\.O .Irn O\ {-- ClOI r I [oc) ct (J cf Lr (\l
=o =6 > |
qJrri . .-t.N O\O-o_ .o tl( -oI ll llos) r., L)oN36 ><) |
O.\r\ r ir-r$O . \O(>F.l\ .-- ll hoY'ii TT 8t?(JC:) (J C-l c\t -J ->: nr = r:r | -J aL
o\..-a (\t N.f.\Ns38 9A
Jt /13 ,1 F].:fr,.-t
,r\
L'ors., !
L-
r\.o
-- d)a, ll
IJ
coo.^s
.J ll
o-;
o\o
'@
+r ll
:tl
@-r3
.J ll
a.;
\oo\
(o
.J ll
tr I
O \ONCO a'\'.! c.t .c)O ..c{N .OO rtr O- ll. J c.,l5 l\ --o--rtll ll 00llll(J rt a-l a r (\l (.) rr> b ;J (-) | :': (r
o
-'t'(,J
.l
<)(t'l.-t(U
(r\-t'(rl
oorJ\q,
(o
(o
Itl
o
q,
()
rr\(u,. I
L-:-r-, , -Lr-r-r--t--li*r-r-r -.-l -, -r.*,-..r . l. r-. t- r .
lr" lil ll'Alll
t.tt.t..llrlo'
E. A. SM ITH
aoo HDUlTox ||AtlJla|. EA! !|-De .
HOUETON, TEXA3 A''OOZ
CTlll a l4.aolE
October 26, L98L
. Tonn of VaLl
75 South Frontage RoadVaLl, Colorado 81657
AtteDtlon! llr, Peter Patten
Gentlemeu:
Thle le to adviee that I am the owner of
vaLl Poteto Patch, vail, colorado.
0cT 3CRffB
Ipt 6, Block 2,
I hereby authorlze Janes E. Sbeahan of Vell Investment
& Developmentr Ltd. to act tn rny behalf on matterepertalnlag to zooLag, deeip and developnent of theproperty.
Thaak you for your cooperatLon.
EAS:nm
o
i
,I
J0HN P. HALL and SHERRIE HALL whose street address issherrie,tohn Manor,_Town or rqecr,inicsbu"s, cJ'itv';i=L'"il*1."1and State of Pennsylyulia fo.-iiie consideration of TW0MrLLr0N sEVEN HUNDRED AND Firri iHo[5Ail0-ili,i6olooo.ootgqL!ARS, in trand paid, hereby seit ano coiv-y'io'ioenn n.splITH, JR. , TRUSTEE oi ttre Siri iI Trust z:, wioie it"""taddress is 800 Houston Natural -das guir diig, ciiy'of Houston,county of Harris and State oi rJi.r, the f6irowi-ng.reat propertyin the county of Easle and State"Ji'c;i;r;;;,-io"i,r,
WARRANTY DEED
(short Statutory Forn)
Lot 6
Bl ock 2
VAI L/ POTATO PATCH(Torvn of Vail )
ts appurtenances and warrant the t.i tlc0venants , condi ti ons , easements and
with all isubject toof rcco rcl .
PENNSYLVAItTA ),/? ) ss.f,Taaedeub )
foregoing instrument was$day of Vrrr. , l9gl ,
t,litness my hand and official sea
lly Commission expires :
e to the same,restri cti ons
acknowledged before me
by J0HN P. HALL and SHERRIE
S i gned th i s 41D day of J"r.
STATE OF
County of
The
rhis -ff.D
HALL.
lArltcl^ I cuRREY, ilOTARY PUEUC
I-OWER PAXION IWP,, DAUPHIN COUIITY
My co tsst0tt EtptRES SEpr. 3. t984M"mber PBnrlyFrnn lbiooelron ol llotarirs
'l--
"lt
urft
(*
PLANNING AND INVIRONI'll:N'lAL COII}'IISSION lilli[']'ING
0ctober I2, 19BI
s fAFl.-PRESF.NT
Gerry White
Scott lldwards
Dan Corcoran
Duane Piper
Wil l 'l'rout
Roger Ti I kcnre ier
Jim Morgan later
Di.ck llyan
Peter Pattcn
Peter Jainar
Betsy Roso lack
Larr:y lJskni th
COUNC IL
Ron Todd
1. Apprgval of JLifr!!S:_€ Septernber 28, 19-81..
l,/i11 Trout pointed out that item 7, requesting a rear setback for lot 1, resub
of Lot 14, Block 4, Bighorn Srd, did not include a request for a variance flom
a setback fron a watercoursc. With this coucction, Scott moved and Dan seconded
that the ninutes by approved. The vote was 5-0 in favor.
2, Apolication for a 58 square foot Gross Residential Floor Ar:ea
'r'ariance for unit #304 Vorlaufer Condorniniums.
Peter Janar explained the memo adding that the applicant had also subni-tted
two alternate schenes which would not require a variance, and that the st-aff
could not see that the applicant had unnece-ssary physrcal liardship.
Tim Clark, architect for Beck Associat-es, said that the appli-cant di.dnrt have
enough roon in this condo (which he had receivgd in an exchange) ' Iie added
that there was not enough height roon in the loft at present for anything else.
[{e explained that to use the alternate plans would mean havi.ng to go through
the bath roon to the dressing or storage area. Roger stated that perhaps if
the plalr were a better one, that was reason enough to grant a. variance.
Dick Ryan remindecl then that a sinilar request in l{est Vail recently was
denied. Peter Jarnar read part of the code, 18,64.0i0 regarding nonconfornting
uses and structures being limited in enlargcment or alteration if it would
increase the discrcpancy rvhich the Pickens request did (nade it more non-conforn-
ingy' Roger felt that each case should be judged on its own rnelit. Duane felt
thai inconvenience did not sound like a real hardship. Will felt that the
archi-tect couldnrt achierre the same thing with the alternate plans. Scott
stated t'hat he didntt have any problem wi.th the bathroorn as proposed, but that
in order to follow the ordinance, didntt scc how they could approve the t'equest.
Gerry rnoved and Dan secondcd to deny the reqtrcst because thcre was no real
herdship shown, and because with thc alternatc plans, the applicant could
have a bath rvithout the variance. 'l'he votc was 4-2 in favor: of denial.
Roger and Will voted against, Rogcr stotjnll thxt the applicant net all but
the hardship cri.teria, and l{ill had stated his rcason.
PEc I rc/n/sl
3, !"$lg:! rq" a condrl*i el9_ljje,pgrryl_t_ _in ordcr t.o I if t t.lrc restrict ion
to linrit thc studcnt Lrody of the Vail Ir{ounta i.n School
Dick Ryan gavc facts fron thc mcrno and stated that the school had bccn a good
neighbor in thc Booth Cr:eck area. lle addc:d that two agcncics lr'ould havc control
ovcr the number of studcnts in the school: The State Dcpartncnt of Eciucation
of Colorado and thc Board of Directors of the school.
Joe Stauffcro chairman of the board of the Mountain School explained that
the reason the school wanted to have largcr classes was a social one, that
the classes of 6 children were too snal1. He addcd that the school has fulfilled
al I the prorniscs made to work on the log cabin, pave thc parking lot, and
landscape. lVith the addition of students " t}r.ey would not increase the size
of the school buildi-ng, and that the present facilj.ties are adequate and can
handle rnore students.
Discussion followed concerning whether or not to set a top limit of students
in the conditional use permit. Joe felt that without a top set nunber, that
the -school would use good judgement with safeguards also from the State. He
added that if the classes were too largc, rnary parents would conplain. If
the nurnber of students became too much for the present facilities, they would
have to come back to the PEC to increase the size or nunbcr of buildings.
Dan spoke in favor as a neighbor, as did Nancy Miller', anotJrer neighbor.
Scott felt that if'they removed the student 1imit, it was likely that the
next request would be for an increase in the size of the building. Joe said
that the present board was not planning on increasing the size of the building,
but that later they r,rere planning on coming in to ask to put in a custodial
apartrneDt in the loft area.
Roger was involved in the original application process with Vail Associates
to use the land for the school , and remenbered that the biggest concerll was
to restrict bhe,number of students for the benefit of the neighbors adjacent,
and felt that he had no objection to the increase if the students could be '
kept h'ithin the present bullding.
Itlill Trout wanted to know the precise nunber of students per square foot of
building limit the State would have on the school . Joe wasnrt able to anslver
this, but stated that 12 students per class was thc ideal class size in their
opinion. Scott felt that he would personally prefer a limit, even if it were
beyond the boardrs expectation. Duane agreed with Scott, but also agreed
with Dan that the school would be using the State guidelines and also that
.the school had been a good neighbor.
Roger noved and Dan seconded to approve the request for a conditional use
pennit in order to. lift the restriction to limit the student body for the
reason that the State would restrict the number of studcnts. The vote was
6-1 in favor with l'Iill voting against. Will r.ras not opposed to expansion
but fclt he couldn't vote without knowing, exactly what the State restrictions
were in terns of nunbers. The request was granted.
PEC
a
10/12/8t
+._-!,.Llgg:t _For a var'ilnrc from sidcat 1763 Shasta" lot 12" Vail Villacc, lot 12" Vail Village l!('st lliling #2. Applicant:
lrntl front sc ti) il ck s for a residencc
Gottlrr icd Ang) ei.tncr.
Petcr: l)attcn cxplaincd thc meno adding tha.t the st;rf f rccorurcndcd denial or
tabl irig to let the architcct arrive at ir better solution to the site.
John Perkins, architect for the applicrlnt, stated that the issue is thatIlr. Artglcitncr desired to build a.n Europcan style ch.riet, and that the house
woulcl have to be rcctangular. Outside dirncnsions would be 30 x 40, feelingthat 24(10 sq ft rvas a necessary size for a fanily of 4, lle explained thatthe lot faced south, and also the views are to the south, so they wanted toput thc garage in the back and out of thc way.
Dan stated that after being out on the site, that he would agree that it
was possl.ble to have a. better design. Ije was nore in favor of putting thcgarage in the front, Johnrs reply was that he didntt hant to show the garage
doors on the front elevation. Roger suggested putting the girlage on t'he otherside, and Peter replied that this would move the house rvithin 5 feet of thepropel'ty line, and that those neighbors had already disapproved of the plan
as it existed.
John said that he has a letter from the owner to thc west and that this ownerdid not have any problern with 1t
Gottfried Angleitner, the olner, stated that he had bought the lot before
annexation and didnrt r:ealize the rest::ictions. IIe felt that the i\ortheast
corner was not buildablc. Dan pointed out t.hat the neighbor to the rvest hadsold the lot to Angleitner, Gerry felt that building the house as prcsented
would overclorvd the ncighbors. Duane said he did a hzrsty check on squarefootage and found that with 1100 sq ft footprint, wi.th height, could allowthe structure to be cl osc to the requircd size. and that thcre still couldbe a 'Ilrol ean styl e.
John explained that the lot was 4 to 5 feet lower in the back, and wantedto work with Iittle excavating or fill. More suggestions regarding steppingthe living spaces dorr'n, trying to adjust the building shape to fit the lot,
and the south exposure fol I owed, Roger mcntioned that the PilC is concer.-nedwith energy conservation, and that the south exposure was lnportant. Perhapsshifting the house to the east was discussed, though a letter had been receivedfron the property owner to the east protcsti-ng the setback requests.
The otrner requested tabling until the next regular PEC neeting.
The members voted in favor of the reauest to table.
.5. Request for.a conditi.onal. usc pcrmit to hcve a rcal estatc office in srracc'ff;f tF-v icaiiffi
Peter Patten explained the nemo, adding that this nal1 would be sirnilar tothe rnall s in Lionsheacl and Vail Village and should be trcated the sane way.
Jacobson, reprcsenting thc applicant, statcd thct the location was idcaloffices rather than rctail shops--tlr:rt it was locatcd tow;rrd the back.
Jin
for
-4- ro/12/81
lkr addcd that onc would havc to go down stairs anci that it didn't fit intothc traffic prttcrn arrcl was not on the stlect levcl , llc acldt:d that if thcrc
r.Jelc to bc a nix of rctlrj I spacc, thj.s would be as closc to lct:ail as nlany
thin11s. About thc pa r-li j.ng issuc as stntcd in the nr:mo, Jacob.son felt thatthc r';hole idca of nrl ls i,s to gct peoplc in, and clitlntt sce how a real estatooffice could gcncratc nore traffic than a-liurnitut'c: store. ('l'he staff inthe ncno statcd that rvi.th 12 sales peoplcr, the rcal cstate office was boundto conrpound the parking situxtion,)
Gerry rnentioned that this was to be a peclestrian rrrall, ar-rd that if all the
retai I spaces becamc of f ices, tlre mal t- Th-ilrfc tGi worrld bc Iost. The rcal
estatc office could be on the 2nd floor as well, he added. Ile felt that the
whole village should be treated the sanrc.
Dick llyan explained that one reason the new ma1l had a connection toward
Crossroads was to conncct to the opening in Crossroads to the r.rest. lle agreed
with Gerry that the idea rvas to have a pedestrian, shop oric:nted ma11 to tryto tie together the whole vi11age.
Jirn Jacobson rnentioned that there was already a par:king problem on the backof Crossroads and r,/ondered how that c.ould be a good place for people to walk.
Dan felt that this connection was better than the tine in frorrt of Crossroads
where there were 50 or 60 cars.
Gerry White said that the pedestrian level should be a nore active shoppi-ng
center or dining, rather than office, Peter P. added that the uses should
tre visjtor oriented. Dan pointed out that the visitor is already goj-ng tobe on foot aftcr parking in the parking structute, and so r,,'ould not generatetraffic as a real estate office would.
Scott stated that back when real estate offices l{ere a real threat-=when they
were naking lnor'e noney than the retail shops-, it rnade sense to legislate then
out of the core areas, but that people do brorvse through rea.l estate offices
looki.ng at the pictures and brochures. llowever, hc added that a real estateoffice on the ground floor does become very valuable space,
Roger agreed that it made sense to legislate real estate offjces out of BridgeStreet or malls, but didnrt thi-nk it made sense to con{)are this mall wj.thVail Village and Lionshead, He felt that each particular applicant shouldbe decided separately. Danrs concern was rvith the idea of just how many norereal cstate offices were going to want to be on the ground floor if one wasallowed at this time?
Peter repeated that this rnal I was desiglicd for an intercsting commerci.al,
shop-oricnted atnosphere, similar to Conunercial Cores 1 ald 2, designed forhigh traffic and was planned to be a prinro- nall as stated in the neno.
Jacobson said that the developer had designated business or professional usefor that spot and for another spot also. lte added that thEre were no rcal
estate offi.ces in the Crossroads area. llc felt that the envi.r:onnent shouldbe looked at each time, and didntt feel thcy were setting a precedent.
a l,ric -s- t0/12/8r
Dan rncntiorrcd that hc had just cone flonr a vacation in Durango and as he r.'lr I lied
through the totvn, didn't like all the real estate officcs on the rnain strcot,
and that thcy were n o-t'- looki.ng for rcal cstate off j-ccs. I:ric Bachman fclt
tirat i.f Dan hacl be en f ron D;r1l as, pcrhrLps, they m j glrt have bcen looking for
real estate offices. IIe a.clded that thcy intended to have thc office veryattractive with lots of modcls.
Jinr suggestedlimiting the nurnber of rcal estatc offices in that mall. Gcmy
replied that therc rvould be no way to linit otlter real.to::s fron asking for
conditional uses. Dick ltyan nentioned that peoplc had talked to hin about
changing the fi.rst floor of the Kiandra to real estate offices. Jim wondercd
about using a deed restriction.
Wil 1 Trout wanted to know what percentage of the area the real estate office
would be taking. Scott saw no di-fference if Gorc Range Propcrties asked to
be in that building than i.n thc mug sirop area. Jin Morgan felt that nnybe
horizontal zoning should be talked about with the whole area in nind,
Ji.m Jacobson suggested looking at having only one real estate office in the
building with a non-competing lease in the deed restriction. Dan rernindedhin that they couldn rt gct around the parking and traffi-c. Jacobson wantedto see stuclies showing that it'.would indeed genel'ate traffic. Gerry felt
that the parking was not the issue, for if there was any par:king at all, peoPle
would use it. Roger felt that there were nany unanswered questions.
Scott and Duane felt that if there werc already 42 spaces short, what the
developer put in the spaces would have nothing to do with the fact that
there were already too few parking spaces. Roger stated that he would vote
agai.nst the project now, but with more infornation might vote for it.
Jacobson asked if the only additional information needed was with regard to
parking and deed restrictions, and a-sked also for a po1l of opinion fron the
nemb ers .
Jim stated that if the appl icant coulcl come back
eirse his concet'n of the parki.ng, he nrj-ght vote in
Duane felt that he did not want the applicant to
Dan felt that what was needed was a clarification
parking and he was concerned with traffic.
Gerry felt he would vote no notv, because who knew
how many real estate offices were too nany?
with a deed restriction and
favor .
show a deed restriction.
of restrictions concerning
the magic nunber of
ltlill would like to see a real estate office there with a lease agleement.
Scott was in favor of the real estate office without a lease,
Rogcr was concerned about the parking program for the whole progrant.
Jacobson askcd to table till the next regular nceting. The ncnbers votcd7-0 in favor: of tab)ing.
(t. Rcqrrcst for t1 atrlcndrn()nt to tlre 'lowrt of Vlril Zort irrg 0rtlinrrrtcc No' 30iA
"
r-?i'i g z7l-fo ?r.i-tr -orrc iinliffi c'i,'i i t 6u to-t! .'t' r uit'- f -tou,-rc-
Appl icant: Vail Illvcstment and Devcl oPlncnt, Lt d.--.--
t
I)cter Pzrttcn explaincd and listed tho restrictions in the ncno. Craig Snowdon,
architcct for the appl icant, statcd t-hat tl're applicant agrecd to the restrictions
and addccl that thc-s-e would bc l1xut'y unj.ts with a s ii-n glr-;r c c css onto thc
Potato l)atch Drive, Petcr s;tated that he had rcceived :l letter from John
Ha11 stating that hc approved the rerlucst. Craig expl:rincd the access fr:otn
Potato Patch Drivc an<l also thc visabil ity. Ger:ry stressed that the total
allowable GRFA wouldltt be exceeded. lle was concerned l"'ith the growing
need for crnployee housing. Jirn Sheehan stated the plan was to incorporate
the employee unit with the cabana neat: the pool .
I{oger moved and ltrill seconcleci to recorrurrend to Town Counc j.1 approval of thc
amenclment wlth the conclitions of approval listed by staff. The vote was 7--0
in favor, unanimous,
7. Reque_st for exler:ior alteratj.on ar1d nodifiTtlon ,to.ihJarnourrtofofficespaceondeck.APp1icants:
Carlos Agostoni and James J, Sprowls.
Rick Baldwin of PierceBaldwin Associates, alchi-trects for the ploject stated
that Dick Ryau rcconmended they come bcfore thc PIIC that day'
Dick Ryan said that the Council had approved the Casino rcquest with changes,
and that lulrs, Hill had sent a letter shorving no real objcction wi-th the extension
to the r{est. Rick added that the briclge was a dead issue at present--
that other external factors had forced this decision.
Dick felt that the PEC nust concentrate on the issue.
fol lowed concerned liking the proposal .
Dan noved and Roger seconded to approve the exterior
The vote was 7-0 trnanimously in favor.
The neeting was adjourned at 5:40.
-6- 10/12/81
The di'scossiorr which
alteration of the deck area.
oa
PI,ANN ING A\iD ENvlll0l'lllliN't Al, C0M|"!ISS ION
Monday, 0ctobcr 12, l9B1
3:00 P.n.
l. Approval of minutes of Septenrber 28, 1981.
2. Request for density control vatiance to extend existing loft area
on unit ll304 of the Vorlaufer. II,JI. Pickens.
3. Request for a conditional use pernit in order lift the restriction
to limit the student body of the Vail Mountain School.
4. Request for a variance fron side and front setbacks for a residenceat 1763 Shasta, Iot 72, Vajl Village ltest Fi)ing #2, Appli"cant:Gottfried Angleitner.
5. Request for a conditonal use perrnit to havc a real estate officein space #7 of the Vai-l Village Inn, Phase III. Applicant: P.
Van Ewing, III.
6. Request for an amenclment to the Town of Vail Zoning Orcliriance No.
30, series of L977, to add the allorr'ance of one enployee rmit,
on Lot 6, Block 2, Potato Patch. Applicant: Vail Investment and
Developnent, Ltd.
Publishcd in the Vail lrail Octobcr 9. 1981.
MEI'40RANDUII
TO: Planning and Environnerrtal Cotrunission
FROM: Departnent of Community Developurent,/Peter Patten
DATE: October B, 1981
SUBJECT: Proposed anc:ndment to Ordinance No. 50, Series of 1977 as it relates
to Lot 6, Block 2, YaiL Potato Patch Fjling No. I to allorv 30 unit-s
plus an enployee ::estricted ca.retaker unit, Applicant: Vail Invest-
nent and Devel oprncnt, Ltd.
BACKGROIJNI)
Ordinance No. 30 of 1977 was the down zoning ordinance resulti.ng fron the
Growth lUaragement Stucly. One of the donn zoning-s was a nulti-family parcel
in Potato Patch--Lot 6, Block 2. The PEC and Council voted to zone thj-s perr:el
to a naxinun of 30 units with Mediurn Density Multi-Fanily Zone District develop-
ment standards (i.rrcluding GRFA).
REQUE9T
The request is to arnend that ordinance to allol another unit rvhich would be
used to house a caretaker/ security person near the entrance to the project.
The applicant has stated that he would agree to the applicable restrictions
of Ordinance 22, Series of 19Bl to the unit (restrictions for the secondary
dwetling unit for lots under 15,000 sq ft). Also, he has agreed that no additional
GRFA witl be requested (other than that allowed for tire original 50 units)
for this caretaker unit.
RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Cornmunity Developnrent reconrnends aPProval of this ordinance
amendment. I{e feel that not only does this tyPe of unit selve a valuable
pulpose for the future residents of the project, but it allows the project
to provide housing for the enlployee(s) it is gencrating.
Conditions of Approv:rl
I, That thc restrictions contained in Section
18.13,080 (B) 3, 5, 6, and l0 bc applied and
executed as it relates to the caretakcr -unit.
2, That the total allowable 6RI:A for thc oriSj-nal
30 units not be cxceeded on the prolcrty.
I p,r( c'i E
" ,tct/ ttl
department of community development
October 8, 1981
John Thornas
Vail Investrnent and Developnentr LTD.
P.0, Box 696
Vail, Colorado 81658
Re: Lot 6, Block 2, Potato Patch
Dear John:
Itve received the new topographic nraps fron Eldorado Engineering'
Irve also spoken with t'tiihiel Heinbulk, the surveyot, and he has
confirrned tirat there is substantially less area of 402o sloPe in
the southwestern Portion of the site' He also agreed that the
40% slope that did exist in this area is due to the road cut' and
not the natural sloPe of the land.
withthisrevisedsubnittal,IrverecalculatedtheallowableGI.FA
on the lot. My figures are as follows:
Acre s
r70,755
9,583
76r,L72
APP:bpr
luwn n llil
box 100
vail. colorado 81657
(303) 476-5613
Total site area
Area over 40eo sl oPe
Buildable site area
MDMF GRFA area
Allowable GRFA
.-'1'I
Sincerely, ./; .)_ --
, t /1.'iJJi2-
A., PETER PATTEN, JR
Senior Pl anner
3,92
. zz
3.70
!q40
sherrie ,fohn Manor
Mechanicsburg, FA 17055
october 1, 1981(dictated Septeqber 28, 1981)
Town of VaiI
Department .of Corununity Developrnentettn: A. Peter Patten, .Tr', Zoning AdninistratorVai1, Colorado 8l-657
n.
D lt-a I I
c: Mr. James Sheahan
Vail- Investment and Development Ltd.
JPH: chs
Wn
Gentlemen
Recently I received a public notice which, inter alian
refertred to I request for air anendment to the Town of r/eil
Zoning Ordinance-#30, Series of L977t to add the allowance of
one eiployee unlt on Lot 6, Elock 2n Vail Potato Fatch, firstfiling, to bring the total of units to 31.
May this Letter please confirm tfre approval of my wife and
myself is owners of the adjacent Lot 34 and of a duplex lot
higher on the hill of this r-equest by Vail Investment and
oeielopnent Ltd. We believe it woulh be good planning to permit
the addition of an employee unit so that the 30 condominium units
may be better cared t6r Lnan by absentee mai,ntenance personnel .
In fact, it is our suggestion that you consider an amendment
po:mitting the adalition of an employee unit to al - such develop-
itents tn ftre va1ley, where requested, so that on trand, on site
management is available as a giood investment to the 1on9 term
mainienance and stability of the growing Vail conmunlty.
Snowdon and Hopkins r Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive
P. O. Box 1998 Vait, Colorado
303 476-2201
81657
Sepfember 17, 1981
1,1r. Peter Patten
Town of Vail Planning Administrator
75 South Fnontage RoadVaiI, Colorado 81657
Dear Peter:
The applicant, Vail Investments and DevelopmenL, Lfd. is requestlng a
modification to the Town of Vail Zoning Ordinance No. 30, Series of 1977(as it effects Lot 6, Block 2, Vail/Potato Patch) at your October 12, 1981
PEC meeting.
As the applicant's representatj.ve and archltect for the project, we are
requesting a modification to Section 10, Exhibit A (Lot 6, Block 2
Vail,/Potato Patch) to allow 30 dwelling units plus one employee housingunil (as restricted under Town of Vail Ordinance 22, Series of 1981),in lieu of the 30 dwelling units as noled in lhe ordinance.
Enclosed is a completed application and list of adjacent property owners
and addresses.. ff you need further informalion or f can be of any further
assJ.stance, please let me know.
Snowdon
CNS: js
Enclosures
t
FORM FO
Petititate@
I.
PETITION R AMENDI4ENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
OR
REOUEST FORIN DISTRICT BOUNDARIESA CHANGE
This procedure is reguired for any amendrnent to the zoning ordinanceor for a request for a district boundary change
A. NAME OF PETITIONER-___V4&-JNYEST'1EIIT AND DEVELOPMENT, LTD.
ADDRESS r.0. gox 696, Vail ,PHONE476-0250
B. NAME OT PETITIONER]S REPRESENTATIVE SNOWDEN AND HOPKINS ARCHITECTS
ADDRESS ZOi Core Creek Driv HONE4T6-2201
c.AUTHORIZATI PROP
SIGNA
ADDRESS Box 696 lt^.3 1V C'IJ Colorado 81658 pHONE 476-0250
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAT,
ADDRESS 760 - 762 - 770 PoLaLo Patch Drive
. '.r
:l
I
ori/l
E.
LEGAI DESCRIPTION lot 6 block filing Vail/Potato Patch
$f00.00 plus 184 for each property owner to be notified.
F. A list of the names of owners of a1l property ad.jacent to thesubject property, and their mailing addresses.
SEE ATTACHED SHEET
PeJition form for Aneto zoning ord or Requesr | "n.r,ne in roli3:ri."
rr. Four (41 copies of the forrowing inforrnation:
A- The petition sharr incrude a srunmary of the proposed revisionof the regulations, or a_comprete dEscription oi ttre proposeachanges in district boundarils and ;-r";- itai""li"g-tf,e-Lxistingand proposed district bound,aries. .tppri"*t nust subnit rritten and/orgraphic materials stating the reasons for i.iqueit.
ffI. Time Requirements
The Planning and Environmental commission meets on the 2nd and 4tl'Mondays of each month. A petitio" ritrr-trt"-rr."""r"ry accompanyingmaterial must be submitted four _ r..i" pii". to the date of the meet_ing' Following the Pranning and snviro;rnenlar comnission meeting,alr amendments to the zoning ordinance or district boundary changemust 90 to the Town Council for ii"ii-_"1i"".
BLock 1 Lot 33 tfalker, Douglas !{.
Box 1'177
Vail , Colorado 81658
BLock 1 Lot 34 Hall , John P. & Sherrie
Sherrie John Manor
Merchanicsberg, Pa. 17055
Block 1 Lot 24 Damson, Barrie M. & Joan S.
366 Madison Avenue
New York, N.Y. 12210
Block 1 Lot 25 Gray, Hadley l{.; Duddy, William
Box 331
Vai1, Colorado 81658
Block 1 Lot, 26 Haerther, Uitl.ian W. Jr.
844 Sunset Road
Geneva, Illinois 60134
Block 1 Lot 27 TraYlor, C.T. Jr.clo 'lsL Mortgage Co.
Box 1413
Houston, Texas 77001
Block 2 Lot 3 Oberlohr, RuPert P. & Conrad
Box 146VaiI, Coj.orado 81658
Block 2 Lot 4 Christenson, Gyneth Ruth
6129 Leesburg Pike. APt. 1204
FaIIs Church' Virginla 22041
Block 2 Lot 5 Sumaru CorP.
c/o Bossow, GarY R.
2800 A AsPen Lane
Vail , Colorado 81657
Block 2 Lot 10 TaLham, Thomas P.
1200 Milan
Houston, Texas 77002
I t
>^4Jth
Cill I hlze
ttrttlgaLl t/f34
abcL I bl z4
6lrJ /Aza
--t 6 I t IwLlbf2h
Wt bl zt
-tttl6tul / (if O
btuL2 bl4
,d*r
//Uk(,futEbn /0,
tux A7/Uql,h hlpS 7/// ,,John P t' 4/wna
4lvrlre Jtw trruarl/lardeulnfu, fz, i/oF
Cvnaan , b*rb l( i "JuAtho ffld*n ftunar
fbpfuil, il// /42/0 .
4o/,''lldb'/. l0' L)//,*t'fuX',ryti 0
Usl
lwrrL',f , thill*^ /D k,
b44 e/",st ru
4rnrae r lllupiE AO1A4
ftp.t/ar, c,f ,k,
flt! hqilft& 0, fur /4/a
llnaelm , ftrKps 770o1
&nnr/l
dnrrctnwt , &wrh U,lil4
klel tazeb.,rd( fl/a , /d 1zo4
tCla Uwal, o Up Zzo4/
lun*il- fup,
o/n fugwp, Cgru{.
'frgt ,^*rdffihe
f,wt/ Utr
flmlt
t
l0 74hr* t%wua P
//0 ffir/*t
hfuBfw, F6rn 77mz
Snowdon and Hopkins o Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive
P.O. Box 1998 Vail, Colorado 300 47&2201
81657
Septemben 17, 1981
Mr. Peter Patten
Town of Vail PLanning Administnator
75 South Frontage RoadVail, Colorado 81557
.Dear Peter:
The applicant, Val1 Investments and Development, Ltd. is requesting a
nodification to the Town of Vail Zoning Ordinance No. 30, Series ot '1977
(as it effects Lot 6, Block 2, Vail/Potato Patch) at your October 12, 1981
PEC meeting.
As the applicant's representative and architect for Lhe project, we are
requesting a modification to Section 10, Exhibit A (Lot 6, BLock 2
Vail,/Potato Patch) to a1low 30 dwelling units ptus one enployee housingunit (as restricted under Toun of Vail Ordjrance 22, Series of 1981),in lieu of the 30 dwe1J.ing units as noted in the ordinance.
Enclosed is a completed appl-ication and lj.st of adjacent property owners
and addresses. If you need further information or I can be of any further
assj.stance, please let me know.
Cl{S : js
Enclosures
Snowdon
I
FOR
retitiofate September 1?, 1q81
:
AMEN'DI'IENT
OR
REQUEST FORIN DISTRICT
PETITION TORI{
A CHANGE
I. This procedure is reguired for any amendment to the zoning ordinanceor for a reguest for a district boundary change
A. NAITIE OF PETITIONER
ADDRESS P.0. Box 695. Vail,PHONE476-0250
B. NAII{E OF PETITIONERIS REPRESENTATIVE SNOWDEN AND HOPKINS ARCHITECTS
NDreSS 201 core, Creek Dri HONI:4?6-2201
C. AUTHORIZATI PROP
SI
ADDRESS Box 696 Vail Colorado 81658 PIIoNE 476-0250
D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
TO THE ZONING ORDTNANCE
BOT'NDARIES
ADDRESS Patch Drive
LEGAT DESCRIPTION lot block z.filinq Vail/Potato Patch
$f00.00 ptus 18f for each property owner to be notified.FEEE.
F.A list of the names of owners ofsubject property, and their nailing
SEE ATTACHED SHEET
all property adjacent to the
addresses.
petition form for A**'.1 zoning ord or Reguest r$r,.nse in uo[i8:ri""
rr. Four (4) copies of the folrowing information:
A- The petition sharl incrude a sruunary of the proposed revisionof the regulations, or a_conplete d-escription oi trr" pi"por"achanges in district boundarils intl ;-;;- indicaiing-tfre-'cr*istingand proposed district boundaries-. appricint nust subnit rritten and/orgraphic naterials stating the reasons fo, '_'"qr"it.
IfI. Time Requirements
The Planning and Environmental commission meets on the 2nd and 4thMondays of each month- A petitio" "itrr-irr.-rr""""r"ry accompanyingmaterial must be subrnitted four _ *'""i" pii"r to the date of the meet-ing' Forlowing the Planning and nnviioirmental comnission r""tirrg,all arnendments to the zoning ordinance or district boundary changemust go to the Town Council-for ii""i-".1i"".
ll
PROPERTY ADJACENT TO.LOT 6 BLOCK 2 VATL/POTATO PATCH
Block 1 Lot 33
Block 1 Lot 34
Block 1 Lot 24
Block I Lot 25
Block 1 Lob 26
Block 1 Lot 27
Block 2 Lot 3
Block 2 Lot 4
Block 2 Lot 5
Block 2 Lot 10
Ua1ker, Douglas ll.
Box 1177Vall, Colorado 81658
Hall, John ?. & Shemie
Sherrie John ldanor
Merchanicsber8, Pa. 17055
Danson, Barrie M. & Joan S.
366 l,tadison Avenue
New York, N.I. 12210
Gray, Hadley U.; DuddY' Will'ian
Box 331Vail, Colorado 81658
Haerthen, I{illian U. Jr.
844 Sunset Road
Geneva, Illinois 60134
Traylor, C.T. Jr.
c/o lst Mortgage Co.
Box 1413
Houston, Texas 77001
Oberlohr, RuperL P. & Conrad
Box 146Vail, Colorado 81658
Christenson, Gyneth Ruth' 6129 Leesburg Pike. APt. 1204
Falls Church, Virginia 22041
Sumaru Corp.
c/o Bossotf, GarY R.
2800 A Aspen Lane
Vail , Colorado 81657
Tatham, Thomas P.
1200 Milan
Houston, Texas 77002
Snowdon and Hopkins o Architects
201 Gore Creek Drira
P. O. Box1998 Vail.Colorado
{g 47elaJ1
81857
September 17, 1981
Mr. Peter Patten
Town of Vail Planning Adrninlstrator
75 South Frontage Road
Vail , Colorado 81657
Dear Peter:
The applicant, Vail Investnents and Development, Ltd. is requesting a
modification to the Tonn of Vail Zoning Ordinance No. 30, Series ot '1977
(as it effects Lot 6, Block 2, Vail/Potato Patch) at your October 12, 1981
PEC neeting.
As the applicant rs representative and architect for the project, we are
requesting a nodification to Section 10, Exhibit A (Lot 5, Block 2
Vail,/Potato Patch) to allow 30 dwelling unlts plus one employee housingunit (as restricted under Tonn of Vail Ordinance 22, Series of 1981),in lieu of the 30 dwell5ng units as noted in the ordinance.
Enclosed is a conpleted application and list of adjacent property ouners
and addresses. If you need further jnformation or f can be of any further
assistance , please Let ne lirrow.
CNS: js
Enclosures
Petititate Se.plember 17, 1s81
PETITfON FORI'I
OR
REQT'EST FOR
A CHANGE IN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
I. This procedure is required for any amendment to the zoning ordinanceor for a reguest for a district boundary change
A. NAIttE OF PETITIONER Vlfr. INVES$8NT AN
ADDRESS P.O. Box 696, Vail , Co PHONE476-0250
B. NAI'18 OF PETITIONERTS REPRESSNTATM SNOWDEN AND HOPKINS ARCHITECTS
ADDRESS PHONE4?6-2201
C. ATITHORIZATI
SI
ADDRESS Vail Colorado 81658 PHONE 476-0250
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS ?60 - ?62 - ?ZO Potato Patch Drive
LEGAT DESCRIPTION lot
FOR AI{ENDI.{ENT TO THE ZONING ORDINAI{CE
E. FEE $100,00 plus l8f for each property owner
D.
to be notified.
F. A list of the names of owners of all property adjacent to thesubject property, and their rnailing addresses.
SEE ATTACHED SHEET
Colorado 816
filinq Vail/Potato Patch
Petition form for Ar,""+ zoning ord or Request tf"n.r,s. i' uoli3:ri""
II. Four (4) copies of the following information:
A. The petition shatl include a srunmary of the proposed revisionof the regulations' or a-complete d-escription oi trre pioposeachanges in district bor:ndariis and ;-r;- inaiciiing-tfie-"existingand proposed district boundaries-. lppricint nust subnit written and,/orgraphic naterials stating the reasons fo" i'uq""st,
IfI. Time Reguirements
?he Planning and Environmental cornmission meets on the 2nd and 4thMondays of each month- A petitio" "itrr-{rt"-rr..."".ry accompanyingmaterial must be submitted four _ r""i" piiot'to the date of the meet-ing' Following. the- Planning and nnviioi:mentar comnission rneeting,all amendments to the zoning_ordinance oi-aistrict boundary changemust go to the Torln council for ii""i-".1i"i.
tlPROPERTY ADJACENT TO.LOT 6 BLOCK 2 VAIL/POTATO PATCH
Block 1 Lot 33 Walker, Douglas ll.
Box 1't77Vail, Colorado 81658
Block 1 Lot 34 HaII, John f. & Sherrie
Sberrie John ltanor
Merchanicsbergr Pa. 17055
Block 1 Lot 24 Darnson, Barie M. & Joan S.
366 Madison Avenue
Neet lork, N.I. 12210
Block 1 Lot 25 Gray, Hadley tt-; Duddy, lJilliarn
Box 331Vail, Colorado 81658
Block 1 Lot 26 3?i'Si:;.ti::i- tl. Jr.
Geneva, Illinois 60134
Block 1 Lot 27 TraYIor, C.T. Jr.
c/o 1st Mortgage Co.
Box 1413
Houston, Texas 77001
Block 2 LoL 3 Oberlohr, Rupert P. & Conrad
Box 146' Vai1, Colorado 81558
Block 2 Lot 4 Christenson, Gyneth Ruth' 6129 Leesburg Pike. APt. 1204
Fal1s Church, Virginia 22041
Block 2 l,ot 5 Sumaru CorP.
c/o Bossow, GarY R.
2800 A AsPen LaneVaiI, Colorado 81657
Block 2 Lot 10 Tatham, Thomas P.
1200 Milan
Houston, Texas 77002
I
Snowdon and Hopkins o Architects
201 Gore Creek Driw
P. O. Box 1998 Vail, Colorado
n3 47&2201
81657
Septenber 17, 1981
l,tr. Peter Patten'
Town of Vail Planning Adnlnistrator
75 South Frontage Road
Vai1, Colorado 81657
Dear Peter:
The applicant, Vail Investnents and Developnent, Ltd. is request5ng a
modification to the Town of Vall Zoning Ordinance No. 30, Series of 1977(as 1t effects Lot 6, Block 2, Vall/Potato Patch) at your October 12, 1981
PEC meeting.
As the applicant I s representative and architect for the project, we are
requesting a modification to Section 10, Exhibit A (Lob 6, Block 2
Vai1,/Potato Patch) to allow 30 dwelling unlts plus one employee housingunit (as restrj.cted under Tovn of VaiL Ordinance 22, Series of 1981),ln lieu of the 30 dwelling unifs as noted in the ordinance.
Enclosed is a conpleted application and list of adjacent property owners
and addresses. If you need further information or I can be of any further
assistance, please let me know.
Si.ncerely,
CNS: js
Enclosures
Snowdon
Petitiolate September 17, 1q81
PETITTON FORITI FOR AI'{ENDI'{ENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
OR
REOUEST FORA CHANGE IN DISTRICT BOI'NDARIES
A. NAITTE OF PETITIONER
ADDRESS PHONE476-0250
B. NA}TE OF PETITIONERIS REPRESENTATIVE SNOWDEN AND HOPKINS ARCHITECTS
NDruSS 201 core.Creek Dri HONE4T6-2201
C. AIITHORIZATI PROP
SI
ADDRESS Box 596 Vail Colorado 81658 pHONE 476-0250
LOCATION OF PROPOSAT
ADDRESS
I.This procedure is required for any amendment to the zoning ordinanceor for a request for a district boundary change
ER
Colorado 81558
D.
Potato Patch Drlve
LEGAT DESCRIPTION 1ot block 2 filinq Vail./Potato Patch
E.FEE $100.00 plus 18C for each property owner to be notified.
F. A list of the names of owners of arl property ad.jacent to thesubject property, and their nailing addresses.
SEE ATTACHED SHEET
petition form for A.""O zo.nins. ord or Resuesr f+h.,rg" in UoIiS:ri."
rr. Four (4) copies of the forrowing information:
A. The petition shal1 incrude a sururary of the proposed revisionof the regurations, or a_complete alsciiption oi trre pioposeachanges in district boundariis and ;-r*;- inaici-inj-tfie-"existingand proposed district boundaries_. eppricant rnust subnit written and/otgraphic naterials stating the reasons fo, i'"q"est.
fII. Time Reguirements
The Planning and Environmental commission meets on the 2nd and 4tJ.Mondays of each month- A petitio" ritrr-trt.-r".""rury accompanyingnateriar must be subrnitted four _ ,o.ei" pii"r' to the date of the meet-ing' Fortowing trre pra"ning and snviro;;entar commission meeting,all arnendments to the zonini-ordinance or aistrict boundary changemust go to the Town Council-for ii"ii-""1i"".
Block 1 Lot 33 Walker, Douglas ll.
Box 1177I vail, Colorado 81658
Block 'r Lot 34 SillijohnnP. & sherrie
Merchanlcsber$, Pa. 17055
Block 1 Lot 24' Damson, Barrie M. & Joan S.
365 !{adison Avenue
New York, N.Y. 12210
Block 1 Lot 25 Gray, Hadley W.; Duddy, I{il]ian
Box 331Vail, Colorado 81558
Block 1 Lot 26 Haerther, tfillian lI. Jr.
844 Sunset Road
Geneva, Illinois 60134
Block 1 Lot 27 Traylor, C.T. Jr.
c/o 18t Mortgage Co.
Box 1413
Houston, Texas 77001
Block 2 Lot 3 Oberlohr, Rupert P. & Conrad
Box 145
VaiL, Colorado 81658
Block 2 Lot 4 Christenson, Gyneth Ruth' 6129 Leesburg Pike. APt. 1204
Falls Church, Virginia 22041
Block 2 Lot 5 Sunaru CorP.
c/o Bossow, GarY R.
2800 A AsPen LaneVail, Colorado 81557
Block 2 Lot 10 Tatham, Thomas P.
1200 Milan
Houston, Texas 77002
corot.da 0t65t
?31
Peter paiten
Seqror Plannoa
Departmcnl ol Communrty Ocvelopment
departmbnt of community developnrent
February 12, 1981
box 100
vail. colorado 81657
(3031 476-s613
John P. HaLI
Sherrie John Manor
Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055
Dear Mr. Hall,
This is a
guestions
history of
response to your;ext6G;;;;>f 9BI concernins zoning
on 1ot 6, Blocf.4, VaiT Potato Pe-t.c\.-!!, Irve itrt'estigated the
iaft€r-Eiiilhave discussed it with La::ry
Rider, Tovrn of Vail attorney.
At the Novernber I, Lg77 meeting of the Totrn of VaiI Council , it was agreed
that the above lot would be allowed 30 drvelling units ott. tire Property(also, they grante.l yo]| J-un1!:-pll-fgt 34). However, there was no contract
en tered int o c onc ern lne-6ell' I orG5-rdT6's s Re s id en t ia I l.l I o or Ar ea (GRFA)
of the property. The lrledium Density lr{ultiple Family (l'lD}fF) Zone District
was designated as the appi.icable developnent standards (setbacks, height,
etc. ) for the lot.
Subsequent to this neeting, in May 1978, a llazard Orditlance was passed
by the Tov,l Council whj.ch further affected cicns.ity and GiiFA on all propertie
(except Single Farnily and Duplex) in the Tot'rn. It is the Town attorney's
opinion that the 40% slope restTictj.on unde:: this ordinance rvould apply
to your propert), with regard to youl' allowable GRFA.
Thus, the 30 unit figure wj-ll remain in effcct, but the alloruable GRFA
can only be determined try the subnission of a toPographic map stamped with
the seal of a liccnsed surveyor, so that a1l areas of 40% or nore can be
subtractcd out. l.{y cornputations frorn the rrnoff icial (unstanrpcd) topo nap
you subnitted in Septernber of 1979 shorv this figure to be in the area of
51 ,000 square feet.
Please note that you nay apply to the Departn:ent of Corrununity Development
for a GRFA variance which rvould Lre dcterrnirled b1'thc PIanning atrd Envirort-
:- nental Conrnission. If I can be of furthex assistarlcc., Please call--encloscdis ny card.
Sinccrely,
et&"-l
A. PDTIR PATTI]N,
Senior I,l anncr
APP: bpr
?#
cc Larry Ri.dcr
r-ioLl1 IrI CAT I Oll AGI':UUi'iuliT
\r-P-( ,-ryv 1
0t c(ttt
THIS AGREEI:EIiT l'rade t-his lst dav of l"air ' 1915 beiv"een
VAIL ASSOCIATEST Ir'NC' ' a Colorado corporation (hereinafter
called ,,vAr') and JoHN P' I{ALL and sIIERRTE HALL (hereinafLer
callecl "Ha1}s" ) '
RECITALS:
I. on April .22' Lg15' VAI as Seller and John P' HaII
as Purchaser entered into the following four Agreernents:
. a' Agreement for the purchase and saLe of real estate
covering Lot I' Block 2' VAIL/POTATO PATCH' Eagl-e County'
Colorado; whic]- real property !s hereinafter referred to as
"Lot 1" and which Agreenrent is hereinafter referred to as
the "Lot 1 Agreernent";
b' Agreenent for the purchase and sale of real estate
covering Lot 5' Block 2' LAIL/PoTATo PATCH' Eagle county'
Colorado; which real ProPert)z is hereinafter referred to as
'Lot 5" and which Agreement is hereinafter referred to as
t
the "Lot 6 Agreement";
cr Agreement for the purchase and sale of real estate
ccvering l,ot 34' Block I' VAIL'/POTATO PATCH' ""n-t" ":"::t:-
Coloradoi which real property is hereinafter referred to as
"Lot 34" ancl which Agreement is hereinafter referred to as
the ,,Lot 34 Agreement"; and
d' option Agreement covering LoL 25' Block 2'
VAIL VILLAGE THIRTEEIiTH FILING, EA9IC COUNTY. COIOTAdO; WhiCh
realproPertyishereinafterref-erredtoas,,Lot25..andr'lhich
Agreemen!ishereinafterref.:rredtoasthe.,Lot26Agreernent''.
2' Pursuant to the above-described four Agreements' John
P. HaIl acquired ti"le to I'ot I ' LrtL 6 '''nd Lot 34 rrd acqrtir'=C
anoptiontopurchaseLot25fromVAl.JohnP.}iallsubseguent-]1'
conveyed Lot 1' Lot 5 ancl Lot 34 to the Halls and assigneil
aII interests in the Lot 26 Agrcenent to the llalls' The Halls
and VAI are the only parties.having any interest under the four
Acrr-,c;.c; tg Ccscr :?'A
3. VAI and the
1, terrninate the Lot
Lot 5 and the Lot 34
is to accomPlish the
,tl rgr''tg
Halls wish to rescind the ourchase of Lot
26 Agreement and modify and amend the
Agreements. The purpose of this Agreement
foregoing objectives'
of this Agreement bv both Parties '
$9,480. 48 (rePresenting Payments
the Lot I Agreement, which PaYments
in the sum of $7,164'23 after
1975 in the sum of 52,316'25) as
AGREEI,IENT
IN CoI{SIDERATToN oF the Recitals and for other good and
valuableconsiderationrVAlandtheHallsagreeasfollows:
l-. Recission of Lot I Purchase'
a- UPon execution of this Agreement by both parties'
the Halts shalI "*".",lt", have acknowledged and deliver to VAI
a General FlarrantY Deed conveying their interests in Lot I
subject only to those matters as set forth in rxhibit A
attached hereto and by reference made a Part hereof'
b- Promptly after detivery of the above-described
Warranty Deed, VAf shal1 mark the Pronissorlt I'lote dated April
22,1975 from Joh,n P' Hall payable to the order of VAI in the
original principal amount of $143 '754'00 "Paid" ' shall obtain
the. Release of Deed of rrust securing such promissory Note and
describetlonExhibitA,andreturnthecancelledPromissory
Note, Deed of Trust and Release to the Halls' Both such
Promissory l\'lote and Deed of Trust were given in connection with
the purchase of Lot 1'
c- UPon execution
VAf shatL credit the sum of
made b1z the Hal1s to VAI on
were made on APril 22, 1975
adjusiments and on JuIY 15,
foIlo-":s:
(i) S3, €'66' 00 shal1 be creCited aqainst the
prin ^pal payment of S3,656'00 due ApriI 22' 1976 on the
Prorn-:;soryNotefromJohnP.HalltovArdatedAprl-t.22,L9T5
in t]:r sum of $69,654-00 relabing to the Lot 34 Agreement; and
' (ii) The balance against the princigal Payment
of9l,7l8-00dueApril22,lgT6onthePromissorvNotefrornJohn
-2-
P. Hall to V/rI ,loO i"rtri! ?2, 1975 in tn,Qut of
relating to the Lot 5 /rgreement.
C. Upon execution of this Agreement by
both VAI and the Halls sha1l be releaseci from all
under the Lot 1 Agreement and all rights of boLh
Halls thereunder shaI1 terrninate.
2. Termination of Lot 26 Agreernent. UPon execution of
this Agreement by both parties, both VAI and the Ha1ls shall
be released from atI obligatj ons under the Lot 26 Aoreernent
and all'rights of both VAI and the Hal1s thereunder sha1l be
terminated. UPon execution of this Agreement, the Halls shatl
execute, have ackndwfedged and deliver to VAI a Quit CLaim
Deed convefing their interest under the Lot 26 Agreement'
together with their copy of the original- option Agreement markec
"Cance1Ied".
3. I'lodification of Lot 5 A@ reement.
Upon execution of this Agreement by both parties, the Lot 6
Agreement and Lot 34 Agreement sha11 be modified and amended
as follows: I
a. A11 references to the Lot I Aqreement and the
LoE 26 Agreement as contained in Seclion 10 of each Agreement
shal1 be deleted;
b.AllreferencestofourAg.reementshallbeamended
to reacl two AgreerTlents in Section t0 cif each Agreementi
c. Section L2 of each Agreernent shall be amended
to read as follor'''s:
12. Construction of Recreational 'A-nenitiee' Seller
I=-tr't v-Pofntd PATcH'
As part of the consideration for this Agreenent,
Purthaser shall have the opoortunitY to construct
recreational amenities on Tract B and on a comPact 'rectangular parcel of land containing a maximurn of
tr,,o coitigruous acres of Tract c as :equested bv
Purchaser and as apcroved bv Sel-1el (which lands
are hereinafLer referred to as Lhe "recreationaL
lands") in connection with his dev lopmcnt of the
ft"ri="t, in accordance wj'th this ction 12' Prior
io taking advantage of the oPportur,ity to-construct
recreati5nal amenities on the Recr'. -'tional Lands'
purchaser shalI submit to seller Di.;ns and documents
evidencing aPProval by the Town of ':ail for the
construction- of recreltional ameni les such as tennis
$171,5oo. o0
both parties,
obligations
VAI and the
-3-
O !-^ ^h-'lr'cr'd) ' " t'u'i'-'i:ri Pool'ccurts (u:': ch ti(-l)' be enclc.,scd)
a par three noii"oi'';;":!-::l::.'l-lli,.[r:";]:l:'.ii;"
::::"""1;:' r,l = i,1,?i"il^;;";,i,il;i - ; "ou i' i s i or and'"he
ordinances an'J : I''cgulations of tht"t""'t :l ^::i t;*=il:|"'
plans must arso' ;;;;i;" -that-the recreatlonat
iirt ue madc a'vailabIe for.use--by the general-public'
and Purchu"ot "i"ii"uJ ""frt1ed
-to. :1":::^" "31t"r,.""t
discrimin.toty'itt for the use of the same' r
aqrees to submii";";;-Pl-als t" ii't-r"wn 9f vair by
N6vember 1, 19i6 and witt'in =i"it"a"vs after'approval of
such planr uv iIrl"i, setler "iip"t-"r'u=:: =:h:11 enter
into a Lease which will cont-ilil ;;;g other provisions'
lrt" fofro"ing Provisions :
a- Purchaser must cornrnence const:::tt^?l of such
recreatio".'' iiiiiti'll-*iit':-""I1''"t irca:s after the date
of the Lease tna to'pfete the t"*"-*itnin a reasonable
period of time'
b' Purchaser may use the Recreational l'ands onllz
for the "or,"ar.,r"iion
-ana
^-irri..rli"" "r the recreational
ameniiies """;;;;-;y suctr app'roved plan'
c' The recreational- amenities must be available
fot t-tf" UY tfte general Public'
d. The term of the Lease sha1l be for a period
of 99 Years'
e. The rent under the Lease shall not be in
excess of $100'00 Per Year'
f. The Lease shall be.a "net" Lease; i'e"
purcr,-aser =n"ii-ilv-;ii,::::l *:::'l::t":i:l lli ""r.?Tffii::':""l.lt"nl:;::i;'::ii';-;;;ri{v'r''ries' I
and -..he "o=tt-Jf'rei'"ir= and naintenance'
If the Town of VaiI has not approve'd such-pl"t't= as above
described ttiii"-li"'-!""t rt"^-Lrre aate of their
submissio", !"i"i-i"Ii'6-p"t"rtl="t has not pursued
attempting to obtain approv"i";; t""n'!t3l:'uttigentlv
within t''t"i' i"ii"a-"r ti*"' 'Purchaser's right to
construct t":;;-.;;'i-r-'*"";-;i;; ;" the Recreational
Lands shall ;;i;;;i"anv teiii""t"' H:YeY:r' If
Purchaser'";;;;;;-'!aitio''.i"'ii*t-t" :b:i:? aperoval
from the toti"li-i-tl'-t''a tl Purchaser'shall have been
diligently p"tJii'-'; ii" attempt to obtain such
approval, tnen ver agrees-"of-io ""ttu'onably
withhold
granting .t'l'="*i"''=i6"" of [i*" to P-:Tcha??tni?ln"t"t
ih"_p,,'po:: ::r::lirH3:,'t;: ;:*?:irr: ;i any of
shall be rn
the Notes d";;;i;;; i" s""ti""'io or this Asreement
at any tl,n"'"i^"i;;;t";'s rioht to construcc
improvsne''t= oi-Ir'" n""r""ti""ul Lands shaII also
;;i;;il;;iiy";";!:1.:, ..TiT:":""?'.il: ;::;l:: ll' "'
!l:;.':::'::'13''ill".fi"xl;;;"''t' "''i'i:.?"d at the
closing or iiiit'r'ul sr'arr it'steaa survive the closing
of title-
d' Section 13 of each Agreement shall be amended
to read as follows:
13- qeeeprs " i3)l"itt;nln"owner of Tracc u' "::"/:" -'i^:^:* p,rr.haser shallconsiderati;;-for this Agreernentr Purchaser
have the ",'i^i'il"i;t -i:-i:J:;!i:l';":n:":"i::i:li::'
::"*;::*ll3"'-;"i::"i?Id'"-;;;";;]u''" svstem" ) on
Tract C in connection with-his develbpment of the
premises, in accordance *itii-Li'is section 13' Prior
io tal:ine '-;";;;;;;-oi *'"-oplott""itv to construct
o ..o_,_.,the Conve)tance Svstem, Purchatscrr 5h;iLl- F\rl-,mr t plans
and documents e;idencing aporolral bY the Town of
Vail- for tne'"onstruction of t-he Con"'e"'ance Sl'sten on
Tract c. such plans shall be-in "'opliott"e-with
the
Protective covenants for veri/l'orero -PATCH-SUBDr\tlSIoN
and the ordinances and n"g"fl'--iont of the Tovrn of vail'
Such plan''.jil";i=1..|'""iae-itr"t the Conveyance system
will be made available for use- bY tle- general public'
Howeverr Purchaser sha11-f'"t'"-thl righl to make such
charges as h;";;;*=-iit rot lr't t'tse lnd operation of
such conv"y-""E=ivJt"r-r"-r"ig-"r- iuctr chlrges and fees
are non-discriminatory agarr,"i trr-" general public'
se'ler shall apProve or aittiit;;; ;i such -plans within
sixty a.y= uri!;-;;; I"l^itiitn of such plans bv
Purchaser to seller, which approval shall not be un-
reasonabrv ti;;;;ia: it s"rilt does not disapprove
of such pr.,,i';rilt; """i' tio"l suctr plans-shalI be
ieemed to naie"i"""--"ppt"ved bv setlei ' rf seller
disapprov." oi """rt pi^""s' puilhaser sha1l revise
such pIan" tt'a re-sulmit t""i-iltti=ea p1ans. to Seller
for sellea's approval in ttre"mannet t"i forLh in this
Section 13' I]pon apProval of such plans bv seller'
Se1Ier shal-1 ionvey such non-exclusive oerpetual
oedestrian easements over,. above and across 'Tract C as
rnay be t.q,'iili" [o-t"""*piittt-tr'" ' instal]-ation of the
approved Conveyance-system'
-'-fi is understood and agreed
that purchaser shall have unt*ii aptlL ??'-L977 in which
to submit such plans to the'i"t" tr Vail- for its approval'
rf the Town of Vail has ""t "pploYtd t::l ?1""= rvithin
one year from-the date of subirission' and if the
Purchaser has not diligently trursued his attempt to
obtain such approval duri"nttIli"i"ir"a' then iurchaser's
right to consiiuct the Conve;-ance System on Tract C
shall automatically termi-"u[L. If, however, Purchaser
has dirig.,'iiy-pt"'=""a r'is -aitemDts to obtain such
approval tto#d;';;; "i-v"i1 durinq such period'
then upon Purchaser'" t"g""!i-vni-agreesito extend '
such peri"d';;";i;" ut tiy be necessary in order to
obtain the necessary aPprot"I fto'n the Town of Vail'
rf Purchaser shall te in a"Il"it under the^provisions
of any or tie-ilo!t=-a"""tiu"J-i" section r0 of this
Agreement -i--"y tirne' Purchaser's right to construct
the conve.,ti""- -sy=tem-on- Tt;;;-' irt"ri ars-o automatically
terminate' -ti*"- is of tnt !J=""ce under- this section
13. rne proii;";; oi tt'it section 13 shall not merge
with the documents exchanged";I-$; closing of title but
shall insteal i"rtit'e the closing of title'
e- Except as modified by subsections 3 a' b' c' d
of this Agreement, the Lot 6 Agreement and the Lot 34 Aqreement
shall remain in full force and effect'
Misce l laneous.
a. This Agreement shall be binding uPon and inure
to the benefit of VAf and the Halls' their respective heirs'
personal rePrcsentativcs' successors and assi-cns'
b- This Agreement' together with the Exliibit attached
hereto, contains the entire agreement betr'ieen the parties and
rnay not be further modified or amended in any manner excePt by
-5-
-! ii '?t"' sisned bY vAr "'a t"?:ral}s'
an instrurnent 1n
c' T5e Section heailings are inserted only for
convenient reference and t" l"'-:l:::-':"H'"t"';t"'
*''
:onvenient rer=--"
^-.F nr ttrg Exhibit attayfr-e.-a. herec.r'
- l : _- _,
""on"
of this Agreeme-nt "t tn-:-:,.
*- -.,r,rti.i"il in-accordance - -.scoPe e! ";.
rnr= on;.ement
-shal-} be constr"9"
"" l- ::'--- ''
r.,irh rhe raws or *" t:"_:",::r""rr:;t"-;"", wrirten.
ExEcuTED the day and year
rNc. rVAIL AssoclATE-:1*
"
*ii tl"t""iI corPor at ion
ATTEST.:
{
6Eret
-5-
E_IllrBrT A
(attached to and forming f Part of Agreement
between vair Associatesl rn9-., a colorado corPora-
tion, and John-"]-i"ii-ind sherrie Ha11 dateo--""'i y /'Le75)
I"TATTERS TO WHICit TITLE IS SUBJECT
1.
2.
3.
4.
rhe lien of real propertv tti:t^,,::? 3:'":::^""ts
for LeTs'
i'jttii""tl-:'gzs' ^"na' for subseguent vears'
Riqht:of the Proprietor gf 3 vein or lode to extrict and
r"mo.," his ore Jil;;";;;*l-tnotri"ti" s.'ne be found to
oenetrate ot t"t"ttect the pt"titlt-hereby ?:l"ttd' and
iigr,t of way ror aitcnes or ttnlil-""nstr-ucted' by the
adthority o, .r,. united states li-t"r"."ed, in.,uni-"ed
stares parents -;J;;;;; r.aay_? , ^lgoa in Book 48 at pase
so3, and recor":;-;;;;-ril'rsig'i"-"""x 123 at paee 517'
Restrictio'':^1: ;::t:'.";:nl"rltlt'ument
recorded March
5, 1974 in Boox
utility and drainage easemerrts as shown-g".th: Prat of
Vair/pora.o nu.iiil'i"Iota"a-uttli l''- t97q il-lo"* 233 aE
oaqe 629, ano -I"lut"tted in -i;;;t;"nt recorded March
'ri"'rt1l- in-sook 233 ax Page 528'
i::"1 l:; :: ",,€4" fu:1 i ; *i:i: !"i!:'#: :, liil' ?ilu'
from Jofrn P' "uii ffi'tr't p"uric truEEce of 'E1:9le
county, coforadl-rot the use "i v"ir Associates' rnc'
qiven to secu." a promisrory ,,1a" in the originar
Siit"itr.t-"^o"''t of $ra3' 7s4' oo'
o rffi'
VNIL
JOHN
AGREEMENT FOR THE
ptincinsn AND SALE oP
REAL ESTATE
THIS AGREEI'IENT dated lpriL 22' 19?5 is -between
ASSOCIATES, INC'I a Colorado co::poraticn ("Sel1er") and
P. HALL ("Purchaser")'
1. Purchase and SaIe' Seller agrees
convey anC Purchaser agrees to purchase and pay
described real ProPerty:
Lot6,Btock2'
VAIL/POTATO PATCH
;;;i! -ountY' colorado
The above described real ProPertY
,,Premises'. The Premises are sold
and conditions and subject' to the
agreenent The purchase price for tbe
2' PurcheJe-Jrlse'
Premises is $2 14 ' 3?O ' 00 payable as f oIlor'rs:
(a) $17I'500'00 shall be paid by Purchaser exe-
cu-,ing and delivering to Seller at the closing of title Purchaser's
-promissory note substantially in the form of Exhibit A attached
.heretoinsuc}rprincipalamountandbearirrginterestattherate
of 8t per year' Such promissory note strall be secured by a
deed of jgrlst to the Public Trustee of Eagle county' colorado
for the use of Seller constituting a first lien on-the Premises
'substantially in the form of Exhibit B attached h'-'reto'
(b) Thc balance of the .purchasc
i': ic'e ' subjecc
toadjustmentassctforthinSection3,shal}b:paidtoSel}cr
at the closing of title in cash or by a certifie'l or bank cashier's
check PaYabIe to Se}ler
to sell
for the
and
f ol torring
is hereinafter ca1led the
anil Purchased on the terms
matters set forth in this
- Price' The f ollor"'ing
3. I'a,
items shaIl be adjustments to the purclrase Prlce:
(a) Real- property taxes and assessment: ":-:":
premises for the year of the closing of titte payable in the fol-
lor'ring year, with the amount of such taxes and assessments baseil
upon the amount of such taxes and assessments for tbe year pre-
.ceding the closing of title' sha1l be apportioned b'etween Seller
and Purctraser as of the date of the closing of title'
t"' ^t the.closi ng of title' Se]Ier shall pay the
premiun for the oh'ner's title insurance.n"t::".,to be issued to
PurchaserPursuanttosubsection4(a)(i)..Atthec}osingof
titre, purchaser sharl pay the premium for a mortgageer s title
insurance policy to be issued insuring the deed of trust des-
crib'ed in subsection 2 (a) and shall also pay all recording and
documentary fees clue at the crosing of title. Each party shall
Pay any other costs and expenses incurred by such party in
. connecrion wi-.-lr the transactions conternplated by
::t:r:t^^.:",:onnectroJr w..urr u"-
'.r_i ar +o or on the date of
4' Title Evidence' (a) Prior to o:
closing of title' Se11er shall .deliver to Purchaser at Seller's
exPense the following title evidence:
(i) A prelininary title insurance conmit-
'mentissuedbyTransamericaTitlelnsuranceCompanyshowingthe
.statusofrecordtit}etothePremises.Suchprel.iminarytitle
insuranceco;imitmentshallcommittoinsuretitl'JtothePremises
- the arnount of the purchase price subject to the
in purchaser an ErrE arrrv-"- - r^: ,. orbro and to the standard
matters set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto
printecl exceptions appearing in title conmitrnents issued by said
insurer witlr respect to real property in Eagle County' Colorado
uPcn Pa)'r'ent of the policy prcmium by Se'l-Ier' a;rd the reco::ding of
'a cor)veyance from Se1ler to Purc)raser'
.' (ii) A certificate of taxes due prcpared bY
the Treasurer of Eagle County' Colorado'
'-2-
(b) If Purchascr asserts the cxisterrce of any
encumbrance, encroachment in'or defect in or objection to title
other than those set forth on Exhibit C which renders title to
any portion of the Premises unmarketable and which Purchaser does
not \taive (any of which are calJed "defects of title"), Purchaser
shall give written notice of any such defect of title to Se11er
prior to or on the date of the cLosing of tit1e. If Purchaser
does not give seller written notice of any such defect of title
within such time, Purchaser shall be deemed to have waived any
such defect of title. After receipt of such notice, Seller may,
but shall not be obligated to, remove or cure a1I such defects.
If Seller elects Lo attempt to remove or cure aII such defects,
Seller shall be entitled to an adjournment of the closing of titl-e
for a period of up to 30 days in which to. remove or cure such
defects. Se1ler shall be entitled to use the proceeds from the
closing of title to cure or remove any defect of title which may
be removed by payment of an ascertainable sum of money. Seller
shall also be entitled to provide Purchaser with title insurance
protection against any defect of title and such title insurance
shall be deemed to satisfy Sel]errs obligation to Iemove or cure
such defect of title. If Seller does not elect to remove or cure
aI1 defects of title prior to the date of closing of title or if
Seller is unable to remove or cure all defects of title prior to
the adjourned date of closing of title, Purchaser may efect to
rtaive such defects or to terminate this agreement in which event
neither party shal1 have any further obligations hereunder. If
Purchaser does not give Se1ler written notice of termination on
the clate of closing of title or, if sel ler has elected to attempt
to cure all r]efects of title, on the acjourned date of closinq of
title, Pu::clraser shaIl be deemed to ha.'e waived such defects.
5. l'larranties of Sel-1er- i,r) As of -April 22 ' ] 975 ''
Seller warrants and represents as follt..'s:
r
I
:
iI{i
::
{
I
!t
I
;
['
ln Lhe VAIL/PoTATO
(i) Natural gas mi ..ns have been
PATCH subdivision a( :ording to the
insta lled
speci fi ca t ions
-3-
O i.' o !!,"-"),:';*,';,ir'i;:t)i'!" {i''"'f
::: :.? Y:' i^','u Tn' ii.si' "'' Y 6 a s e 6Ed t s L o c- a\ €'
of public Serr'lce cc)n?en)' of Coloradorl Tl'e availability of oFIJt^t""t
naturalgasforthe'useofsuchsubdivisioni-s,}tor':ever'
subjecttothediscretionofPublicServiceCompanyofColorado.
(ii) No Portion of the Premises is
covered by water a-t any time during the year' or is subject
to floods, trurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, avalancheSt
-volcanic erruPtions or any other natural hazard' except that
thePrenisesiSsubject.toanornal-"hieat.,offorestfiresfrom
naturalorhulancauses.Noneoftheforesteillandwithinor
adjacent to the Premises has been burned by forest fires in
modern times. Nc Federal, state or local agencjr'has formally
identified the area in rvhictr the Preirises is l0cated as subject
to a special forest fire hazard' iurther' the Premises is not
affecled by a flood plain, including a 100 year flood plain'
nbr is it in an area designated to be flood prone as identified
bv the Federal t"1::;"
,:li::"":"'"",=". the Zonins Adminisrra-
tor of the Tor':n of Vai1, Holy Cross Electric F-ssociation and
Vail l.,'ater anc Sanitation District to Pro\'ide Purchaser with
lettersrelatingtothezoningofthePremises,theavailability
ofelectricservicetothePremisesandtheavailabilityof
\,JaterandserverservicetothePremises'respectively'Further
sell-er has provided Purchaser with a 9eo1o9icaI report Pre- '-
paredbyl.loodr.;ard-ClevengerandAssociatesofDenver,Co}orado.
Seller makes no rePresentations or warranties as to the
accuratcness or reliabirity of such letters or geological report
or as to their contents'
(iv) AII rvor)< rvhich has been performed in
or about ,-he irc;ni j;es or natcrial s f r-rrnislrcd thereto ""'hich might
itr any circuinstanccs give rise to a nrechallic t s or materialmen t s
lien )ras been paid for and aIJ nccessdrll '',''.u.rs of rights to
a mcchanic's or materiallnenrs lien have been obtained'
(v) Seller has no knorvlcdge of any pending
actions by any governmental auLilority having
overthePrcmiscsaffcctinqtheuscsofortitle
or tlrrcatcncd
jurisdiction
tt\-. -'- . -' _/;e s u !.Dt tttt toJltAY FoL '!'- 7
-r
-,
OOr\)
(b) rn addition ro havine the opport"ll:1 . =y'tr,)\
to review the material ref erred to in subsection 5 ttt
:'^'^:' tfui
Purchaser has had the opportunity to inspect t'5eJ'=.r;:=i-*s' 0U-
the zoning of the Premises ' and the availability of utilities
to serve the Pren''ises' Except for the obligations of Seller
underSection14ofthisagreement,PurchaseraccePtsthePremisesfl . !'Vr:i\
as is in its Present condition
(c) purchaser acr-,nowledges tha-u he has t:t
- ,rrrrr)fW
relieduPonanyrePresentationsorwarrantiesofSel}er'"nt.'ltLt]w_
decision t" ""';:;'"r:""",'."r,r""=""r"::r:'r:::r::':"'::::*J"if!::iice4re lr.fLal
' \s'-'
^*- ^-,-".'"*tttt exchanged at the closing of d€^€orJes'
merge into the various documencs ei'!\/'u,-?
title but shall instead survive the closing of title'
6' Closing of Title' (a) The closinq of title
shall take place at 3:00 p'm' Denver' Colorado time on
at the offices of Sellerrs couDs€lr Holme
Roberrs & owen, suite loro, 1700 Broadwalr Denvel:-:":r^":""
' (o) The fo1lowing shall occur at the closing of
titl-e, each being a condition precedent to the others and a1l-
being corsidered as 6ccurring simultaneously:
(i) Sel-Ier shall execute' have acknowledged
-^--':- = oeneral warranty deed to the Premises
and deliver to Purchaser a 9€
subject to the matters set forth in Exhibit c and to any defects
oftitlewaivedbyPurchaserPursuanttosubsection4(b)above.
(ii) Purchaser shall pay to Seller the portion
of the purchase price payable Pursuant to subsection 2 (b) '
' (iii) purchaser shall €xecute' have ackno"r-
ledged as rec;uired 'and deliver to Se1ler the promissory note
' and dced of trust provided for in subsec-'ion 2 (a)
' 1iv) Each ParLy sha11 deliver to tlre other
- 'f icates' opinions of counsel i::d the
i: .1"., ". ,"""r:* ;::"r" or as mav be necessarv 'or i erPrul
to carry out their'obligations under this agrcement'
(v) Seller shall deliver to Purcha$r : pos-
scssion of the Prcmiscs' Purclraser shall be cntitlsfl !6' ful}
enjol'mcntoft-hePrcmiscsasofthedaLcofposscssion:''l)ject
only to thos'c maLters 'set forth or referrcd to lrercin'
-- : )'-
7' Fir;l'' of Loss' If betvleen the date of this agree-
m?n! and the date of ttre closing of title' dnY Part of the
Premises is taken in condemnation or under the right ef eminent
domain, Purchaser shall have the right by written notice given
to Seller prior to or on the date of closing of titte to terminate
this agreement in which case neither party shart have anY further
obligations hereunder' Seller shatl promptly notify Purchaser of
each occurrence of the l-,ind specified above. rf Purchaser shall
not terminate this agreement because of any such occurrence' Seller
and purchaser sharl perform their respective obligations under this
agreementandthereshallbet.lo.diminutionorabatementofthe
purchase price; provided' however' that Seller shall on the date
ofclosingoftitledelivertoPurchaseranYcondemnationawards
receivedbySellerandassigntoPurchaseralfofSeller'sright,
title and interest in anil to any condemnation awards not yet
received as of such date; and Seller shall refrain from' without
. purchaser's prior rvritten consent' accepting or 'agreeing upon
lhe anount of any Pa)'ment of any such avrards arising out of
such occurrence rrred
B' Brokers' If either Seller or Purchaser has rncr
any obligation' contingent or otherwise' for brokerts or finder's '
feesvrithresPecttothemattersprovidedforinthisagreement.
the party incurring any suctr obligation shall be solely responsible
therefor.Eac}rPartyagreestoholdtheotherPartyharmless..fron
and against any and all costs' exPenses' claims' losses or damages'
including reasonable counsel fees, resulting from violati'ons of the
agreenentccntainedinthisSection.sdAggJoJ|-rA,{,c0rl,n.'o....',1 \N
- ---^xi ar't r"re.s- Sel1er lle* Ptovide/j Purchaser \)lgpg":-"o!jcal l:'iaPs' >errc'rre
/ + l''- '\ I 'i t"")^r ..r-^ Dr-r,.ni s.'s slrot.'i nq '-fe- ^9o.1'-',9''ltr"9f.i i..h Lopos: - r r ica r "'i'^i: f,,f drri'ii:l;f.";iiii.-ir:t_*flrt.i :i' ;ij.,,2,.- ay A t!€ettrEFr.).':-' .Li-*ishes to har.e Os f e.".
the premisr:, at two foot intervals^ -rf Purcnast h,Jtr;'eac|,
a topograpl:ica' map of the premises showing the contour of the:j:;;:7;!
Premisesalonefootinterva}s,.-SeIlersha}lprovidePurchaseruith,]A"JD
such a Lop -rraphical maP at a cost to Pur'chaser at thc lcsser of ao"
tJr sg d
of s500.00 rr sellcrrs cost of labor and materials incurred in 'i;:::'
prcpari'rg ;::ch l-oPographic'el maps plus I5 perccnt of suclt toottt/a'
I,l' Lll ttMr-a:i,
-6-
lrs c'-.r!-Li 1:( J '--. , -!,,.: , 1:'; 5r:llr:"
'the right to obtain a '.oi->oq raphical rrap of ti-re Premises sho\':ing
thecontourofthePremisesatonefootirrtervalsvrithint\.Jo
years after the date of closing of title by delivering a written
request to Seller for such map vrithin such time' If Purchaser
shalt not request sucb maP vtithin such time' Purchaser's right
to obtain such a nap shal1 terminate' Seller shall provide
Purchaser r^rith such topographical map within 90 da1'5 after
Purchaser'srequesttherefor'TheprovisionsofthisSection'9
shall not merge into the virious documents exchanged at the
closingoftitlebutshallinsteadsurvivettreclosingoftitle.
and Purchaser have on this date entered into Agreement for the
Purchase alrd Sale of Real Estate relating to Lot 1' Block. 2'
vAlL/PoTAToPATCH,AgreementforthePurchaseand.SaleofRealEsta-.e
relating to Lot 5, Block 2, :VAIL/POTATO PATCH' Agreement-for the
Purchase ancl Sale of ReaI Estate relating to Lot 34' Block 1'
vAILlPoTATo PATCH, and Option Agreement relating. to Lot 26'
€1ock--1, VAIL VILLAGE THIRTEEiT*TH FILfNG' Each of these four
agreements prcvide that a portion of the purchase price for the
real property covered by each such agreement shaIl be paid by
purchaser delivering to se11er a promissory note to the order
of. SeIIer secured by a deed of trust to the Pubtic Trustee of
EagleCounty,ColoradoforthebenefitofSel}erontheProPerty
sold under the provisions of each such agreement' 9"-9:l"J:'
:lg't 5, s e I I e r sh a r I d " r iY=I-lgjgr =
j't 11"1q- s en-e r a l I" tt-11!y--9" ei
for Lot 30,.Block 1, v4rry.lgrlTo PATcHJree and clear of a1l
liens and encumbrances "*"ept as stt fotth in Exhi
hereto. purchaser sharl not be required to pay any ":l:]91taticn
for the Purchase of such Pr:oPert)' in adcition Lo the consiclerat:cn
;a* -,- .-eer:rents icscribec (-lb?i'e. 1f bct\"'ecn -'-he c'i.'-ue of
thisagreernentandJunel,IgT6Purchaserslra}Ibeindefault
under the provisions of any of the prornissory notes given in
connection }'ith the four agreements described above, Purchaser':
right to obtain a convcyance of such ProPerty shall autoriratical
terminate. Seller agrecs to execute a rnenlorandum of the pro-
visions of tlris Scction 10 for recording at thc rc<1uest of
:..''-:.-l ;.-i' c:. ;
-7-
oo
oraftcrtheclosingoftitleprovidedforinthisPurcbaser on
this Section 11
e:ichanged at -'-he
sha1l not
closing
merge with
of title but
agreement. UPon termina'-ion of Purchascr's right to obtain a
co4veyance of such ProPerty' Purchaser shall execute and deliver
to. Se1ler a recordable document in a form satisfactory to
Seller,scounselreleasingand'guitclairningtoSellera}lof
Purchaser's rigtrt, title anil interest to obtain a conveyance
of such proPerty' The provisions of this Section 10 shall
not nerge rvith the various documents exchanged at the closing
of.titte but shall instead survive the closing of title'
11. Construction of Improvements on the Premrses'
PurchaserisacquiringthePremisesforthePurposeofconstructing
improvements on the Premises at some future date' Prior to the
construction of any improvements on the Premises ' Purchaser agrees
c\
to obtain rhe approvar- of arr regulatory authorities having -\Y--F
jurisdiction over the Premises including but not limited to / \
/t -- .r','. /
the Town of Vail and any Architectural Control Committee'
. Th€i Provisions of
the rrarious docuinents
sha1l instead survive the
closing of title'
L2. constr"ction of @' Seller
is the owner of Tracts B and C' VAIL/POTATO PATCH' As part of
the consideration for this agreement ' Purchaser shall have the
opportunity to construct recreational amlitt": :"
t:tc_:-.:i:
on a compact, rectangular parcel of land containing a ma>:lmum
of two contiguous acres of Tract C as requested by Purchaser and
as aPProved by SeIler (which Iands are hereinafter referred
to as the,,Recreatio:'ral Lands") in connection v"ith his develoPt"tt.'$
of Lhe Prc;:,ises, in : ccordance with this Section l-2 ' ' F::ior to
taking advantag€ ef ihe opportunity to construct recreational
anenities on the Re<'i-eational Lands' Purchaser shaII subnity'o
. i'
' ' L/''a t
St tce e-
plans and docum6.n!5 ,rVidencing approval by the Town of vair for I
the constrtrction of -ecreational amenities such as tcnnis courts'
a swirn-'ning pool, a 'r thrce golf course or othcr similar
facilitjcs. Such p"ins shall bc in compliance with the 1>lotectivc
covc:nal)ts for VAIL,/:'TTATO PATCII subdivision and Llre ordilrirllccs
-n*
S-?-frd resuPmr
and Purchaser shalf enter into a lease which will contain' among
other provisions, the following provisions
colr'tclcl .'ron EF-
(a) Purchaser *"t;;;;;;]""CPt"th recreational
amenities within 3fu -o'-o'r€ .after the date
ofthelease;;N')cot\'lLG-r€THetapt€u)tttltx)rt/fcd'oNAgLePcatob
only for
amenities
s
ar rrrF
MJ/
/' '>.
!'
(b) Purchaser may use the Recreational Lands
the construction and maintenance of the recreational
covered bY such aPProved Plan;
(c) the recreationaL anenities rnus'" be availabLe
general Public;
(d) the term of the lease shall be for a Perloo
(e) the rent under the lease shall not be in
excess of $100.00 Per Yeari ano
I (f) the lease shall be a "net" lease; i'e''
i.|,PurchasershalIpay.al-l.costsassociatedwiththeov,nershipof
| :'-^-." ^^r- i^."lrrFino but not limited to real property
I the Recreational Lands including but not
l' and the costs of repairs and rnainLenance'
'y'.; 'tu"u", utilities charges
.l '!'/ Plt?lhtl4 t!rs No.T tl!n!''/'r? 7t?a^fjj" ;-';-',:e As iescribed-'l .! $. f';i.:;;-- j--' c::ci:=1---'-.--: -;i:'--:-':'i;-1""' :^-
fi,,,,^J". ,r^'3.:;i:1;1'rrrro, purctrascr's righi to consLruct recreatio:"ar
N" amenities on the Recreational Lands shalr auLomatically terminate'
R ;;";:,";"="; ,;,r, be in deraurr under rhe provisions or anv or
I ' " ection 10 of this agreement at any time 'I tn" notes described in s'
I
t purclrascrr s riglrt to construct improvcincnts on the Recreational
\ -'-! ^*-r'i ^:'''l I rr ternj natc ' Tilne is of the csscnce
I Larrds sh'el-I also automat-icaIIl' tcrnj nat(
\\ un(rcr Lhis section 12. Thc provisions of Lhis scclion 12 slrall
and regulations of rhe Town of Vail.. Such plans must also t[
tDU/
provide thar rhe recrear io""t ?lil;;,'.T rli ll |"' x,?:"";li:i,jt t:ff:;.,,
and regulations of the 'r'own ol \
for use by the general eublici i F6€t'
:_
-t-
not mcrge with the
but shall instead
documents exchanged
survive the closing
at the closing of title
.iof titfe.
SelLer
is the owner of Tract C' IALL/POTATO PATCH' As Part of the
consideration for this agreement, Purchaser shal1 have the
opportunity to investigate the feasibility of installing a con-
veyance system for the mechanical transportation of people
(the "Conveyance System") on Tract C in connection with his
dtevelopment of the Premises, in accordance with this Section 13'
Prior to taking advantage of the opportunity to construct the
Conveyance system, Purchaser shalt submit plans and documents
evidencing aPproval by the Town of Vail for the construction
of the Conveyance System on Tract C' Such pIan.s shall be in
cornpliancerviththeProtectivecovenantsforVAaL/PoTAToPATCH
subdivision and the ordinances and regulations of the Tovrn of
VaiI. Such plans must also provide that the Conveyance System
r^rill- be made available for use by the general public' Se1ler ffr,t,r/I V'iv
sha}l approve or disapprove of such plans within sixty uu'Sr,rrff-.l' '
after the subrnission of such plans by Purchaser to Sef feja t171fi:;:,:'.
l-xjr-y ur,"',
Seller does not disapprove of such plans within such time' \
such plans shall be deemed to have been approved by Seller'
If Seller disapproves of such plans ' Purchaser shall revise
suchplansandresubmitsuchrevisedplanstoSellerforSeller's
approval in the manner set forth in this section 13' upon apfroval
of such plans by Sel}er, Sel1er shall conve)' such non-exclusive
perpetual pedestrian easements over' above and across Tract C
asmayberequiredtoaccomplishtheinstallationoftheapproved
Conveyance System' If Seller does not convey such easements as
'describcdaboveby/lpri122,:-977,Pur-ci.as,cr.Srigir.;tocon-
struct':reConveyances)'s'iemonTractCsl'rallautonatically
termina:'...IfPurchasershallbeindefau}tunr]ertheprovisio:rs
ofanyt-itlrenotesdescribedinSectionl0ofthisagreementat
an1l tim,, Purchaserrs right to construct the Conveyance Syslcm
onTracCshallalsoautomaticallyterminate.Timeisofthe
cssencc :nder tl.ris scction 13. T)re provi sions of this section 13
sh.-r].IItrItl.|Cfgewiththedocuments..exc)tatrgedattheclosingof
of titl l>ut shall insteail survive thc closing of title'
-. I r) -
14 . Cor)sLluc-t j c,n-olJro-3(la:--l€!-j!gLi!g' - iit -oi -o? -
before Octc'bcr l, Lg76, Seller shall causc to be constru:J;ed
pav_cd roads as shov.rr on the plat for VF-IL,/POTATo PATCH sub-
Civision according to the standards of the Town of Vail for
acceptance of paved roads for maintenance by the Town of Vail
inalIportionsofYAIL/PoTAToPATCHsubdivisionnecessaryto
provide access to Lots 30 and 34' Block I' and Lots l and 6'
Block 2, VAIL/POTATO PATCH-
(Ol on or before october l' i-g75' Seller sha1l
:s of ttre perimeter of the Premises to be 'staked
with steel pins in accordance with the recorded' plat for the
subdivision in which the Premises is locateil'
(c)' Sell-er shall use its best efforts to cause
its obligations under subsections 14 (a) and (b) to be completed
by the date set forth j.n each subsection; horvever, each such
date sha1l be extended for delays because of weather, strikes,
inability to obtain materials, labor shortages' acts of God'
h'ar, aggression, destruction, contractor l s breaches of contract'
^^!,6*..*..=-!> t r.rc'''r ar-'i ^h r.nrrr'l- decrees or orders or any other
IUvg- rr..r'-:-. eG-L ruv U-lcl LI!'rr,
occurrence or. condition beyond se11er's control occuri'ng in
connection with each such obligation'
(d) The provisions of this Section 14 shal}
not nerge with the various documents exchanged at the closing of
title but shaft instead survive the closing of title.
15. overPass. SelIer has been negotiating with the
Tor'rn of Vail for the construction of a Pedestrian. overPass across
fnterstate Highway I-70 from the Vail/Lionshead area to the
vicinity of the Premises. Seller agrees to cooPerate b'ith the
?o'.in of Vail in these negotiations by offering lanCs o"'ned by
Sellerforeast't'i3]ltgtobeuscdfortheterminuspointsofthe
pedestrian overPass -
-.-'_......16.SubstituteSecurity.(a)--Toiacilitat.*the
thereof)
TCH (the
f anY
is agree-
financing of construction on the Premises (or a portio:'
Seller agrees to acccPt Lot 30, Block I, VAIL/PoTATo P
'LoL") as partial substitutc security for the Payment
of thc promissory notes refcrrcd to in SecLion I0 of t'
r,{,lrt on the f oIlowing colrditions:
Qt, Purchascr ov"ns tlr<: O t" iee si;irirl'e:
absolute free and clear of aII liens and encumbrancee elrcePt
those matters set forth in Exhibit D hcreto; and
(ii) Purchaser may obtain a release of any
one of the deeds of trust securing the promissory notes referred
to in Section 10 of this agreement (but only if Purchaser is
not in default under any of such deed
::"-t
or the promissory
notes secured by such deeds of trust) by the Payment in full of
all Principal and interest then due on the promissory note secured'
by such deed of trustr less 935'o0o' upon the tendering of a
recorclable instrurnent in a form acceptable to Seller vrhich' vrhen
recorded,wi}lconstituteavalidfirstlienontheLotinfavor
'of se'Ier'
(b) Purchaser may tender to serler such other
substitute security to obtain a release of any of the deeds of
trust securing the prornissory notes referred to in Section l0;
provided that seller' in its sole anil "Ot"tr1:: discretion'
shaIl have the absolute authority to determine the acceptability
' of such substitute security and sha}l not be reguired to accePt
anY of such substitute security'
I?' Igt:lggg' A1I notices' deliveries and other
cornmunicationsrequireilunderthisagreementshallbegivenby
handl delivery or by registered or certified mail' Postage Pre-
Paid' directed
:t :"::t"'": "' serrer' to "trer
at:
Sherrie John l'lanor -'---nia I?055
"
i""n""i"tbur9' PennsYrvat
with a coPY to:
tf
tt""il'?:]l :":31:?^3:;'"";!' s'' i ra i''g
*xil"::t";3i:'3o1o-"^"' Ese'
intc'nied for Purchls€!1 'g9 pur-ci":'ser at:
P. O. Bo>: ? - 6.,.E-t
i*ii;:l:'"$:"3::?1* '' oL'Lo' Ese'
I{ith coPY to:
$lT" "l::E'-li
"'SIi?
^1
o' o
Denvcr, t"t"i;:-,:i il'il'"t"h, Dss.I\ttcntion:
-12-
An1' notice, detivery or other communication madc in connection
with this Section shatl be deemed to be effective when delivered
and receipted for. Either party by notice given as above may
change the address to which future notices may. be sent'
18. Assignment. Neither Selferts nor Purchaserts
rights and duties under this agreement may be assigned or
delegated vrithout the prior written consent of the other Party,
which consent may be wiihheld in the soLe discretion of the party
vrhose consent is reguested.
- 19. Default and Termination. In the event of default
by either seller or- Purcbaser hereunder prior to the date of the
closing of title, tbe remedies upon default are as set forth below
unless otherwise provided in this agreement- rf Purchaser shall
default in performing Purchaserts obligations hereunder prior to the
date of the closing of title, this agreement sha11 terminate' upon
. such termination, Seller shall- have no right to an action for specific
performance or money darnages or to any other remedy. If Seller
- shalI default in performing its obligations hereunder prior to
. the closing of tit1e, Purchaser shal1 be entitled to elect to
(i) seek specific performance of this agreement or (ii) to
terminate this agreement. Upon termination of this agreement
under this Section or any other provision of this agreement,
neither Seller nor Purchaser sha11 have any further obligations
hereunder.
20. lliscellaneous. (a) Subject to the provisions of
section 1,8, this agreement shal1 be binding upon and inure to
the benefit of Purchaser and Selter and tneir respective heirs,
persona1 represcntlt-i-r,'c3,- succisi:ors .r.nrl 153-'i-11i.
(b) This agreement, togetiier with the e>:iribits
a.,tached hereto, contains the entire a$rt :nent bctr,'een the parties
and rnay not be modified in any manner ex,'-Pt by an instrument in
.r.rriting signed by Seller and Purchaser-
. (c) The section headings rre inserted only for
convenient reference and ao not define, i mit or Prcscribe the
-r3-
'.4-- -a-----. - -'
scoPe of this
Colorado Law.
agreemcnt or any exhibit attachrd hc:reto'
(d) This agreement shall be construed under
EXECUTED AS of the date first set forth above'
SELLER:
vArL ASSOCTATES, rNc., a
Colorado corPoration,(sEAr)
ATTEST:
SecretarY
-14-
o
E)IIIIBTT A
(Attached to and forming a part of Agreement
for the Purchase and SaLe of Real Dstate
betr.,'een Vail- Associatesr Inc., a Colorado
corporation, as SelLer, and John P. Hall , as
Purchaser, dated APril 22' f975.)
PROI{ISSORY }JOTE
$171.500 . o0 Denver. Colorado
April 22, ?-975
OR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby promises
to pay to the order of VAIL ASSOCIATES' fNC' ' at P' O' Box 7'
Vail, Colorado 8155?, or at such other pI ace as may be
designated by the holder of this note in vrriting' the princS'-
pal sum of $171,500.00 tcEether with simple interest on the
unpaidprincipalbalancesofthisnoteatanannualrateof.6.92
percent from the date hereof until paid. Accrued in'r-erest to
ttre date of payment shall be payable guarterly on the fifteenth
da1, o1 each July, october, January and April of each calendar
year beginning with the calendar year of the execution of this
note until this note is paid in full. Accrued interest to the
date of Payment shal1 also be payable on the date of payment
of the entire unpaid principal balance of this note' The
principal amount of this note slraIl be payable in, installments
as foffows:
g tO,7IB.00 shall be payable on ApriL 22, L976i
S 10,7I8.00 shall be payable on April 22, 19772
S 10,718.00 shall be pal'able on APriI 2)' L973;
.(.")
(d)
(a)
(b)
S I0,718.00 shall be payable on April 22' 1979i
and
Pir<1c ( r: of 'flrrcc Pagcs
Io
(e) the entire unpaid principal balance of this
. note shall be payable on ApriL 22' 1980
. The principal or interest to become due under this
note may be prepaid in whole or in Part at any time without
notice, penalty or premium- Prepayments of principal shall
be applied to installments of principal due under this note
in the reverse order of approaching maturities, and prepal'ments
of interest shall. be applied to instal-Iments of interest next
becoming due under this note. Unless designated otherwise by
the party liable for the payment of this no!e, all amounts
received under this note shall be applied first to accrued
interest hereunder as of the date suih amounts are received
and then to the reduction of the outstanding principal balance
hereunder
'UPonpaymentinfultoftheprincipalamor:ntofthis
note and all interes_t due hereon either through regular pay-
ments or through prepayments, the party liable for the Paf'ment
of this note shalt be enti-"led to a discount in the amount
of $6,200.00. The party liable for the payment of this note
shall be entitled to ileduct ttre amount of the discount froro
the last payment of principal and interest made under this
note. rf the amount of the discount shall exceed the amount
ofsuch1astPayment,theho1derhereofsha11paytheParty
liable for the payment of this note the difference between
the amount of the discount and the amount of such last payment
upon reguest of the party 1iable for the Pa)rment of this note'
In no event shall any discharge of this note in any manner
other than pai'nent in ful'l of the principal amount of this
note and all interest due hereon through Iegular payments or
through prepayments entitle the Party liable for the pa)'ment
of this note to the discount provided for in this paragraph.
Ifthisnoteisnotpaidwhendueordeclareddue
hereunder, the unpaid principal balance and accrued interest
Page Ttvo of Three Pages
o
thereon shall draw interest at the annual rate ot L2 percent-
Failure to make any payment of principal or interest when due
or any default under any encumbrance or agreement securing
this note shall cause the whole note to become due at once
at the option of the holder of this note; provided that the
holder of this note shall not declare a default hereunder
until the holder shaI1 have first gi.ven the Party liable for
the payment of this note written notice of any a11e9ed default
by certified mai1, return receipt requested directed to the
iast address of the party li'able for the payment of this
note known to the holder of this note (the date of the giving
of such notice sha1l be the date of delivery shown on the
receipt returned to the holder of this note) and such alleged
default shall not have been cured r,sithin 30 days after the
date of the giving of such notice. The maker and any endorsers
hereof severally waive presentment for payment, protest, notice
of nonpayment and of protest, and agree to any extension of time
of paynent and partial payments before, at or after maturity,
and if the principal- or interest on this note is not paid when
due, or suit is brought, agree to pay all reasonable costs of
collection, j-ncluding a reasonabfe amount for attorneys' fees.
This note is secured by and entitled to the benefits
of a deed of trust of even date herewith from the maker hereol,
to the Public Trustee of Eagle county, colorado and covering
Lot 5, Block 2,
Colorado.
VAIL/POTATO PATCH
EXECUTED as of the date first
Joirn P. HalI
, Eagle CountY'
set forth above.
Page Three of Three Pages
J
3i c ut , lr-t
Sherrie John l{anor
Mechanicsburg, PA. 17055
FebruarY 2, 1981
Mr. Peter Patten, Zoning Qfficer
Town of VailVail, Colorado 81657
cerely yours,
Ke"t .*.(
1'/r,
Dear Mr. Patten:
It has come to my attention that you have, rePresented to
certain inquiring patiies recently that the allowable GRFA on my
iot g, e1o6k 2, ia'i-l- Potato Patch-parcel may.be less than the
59,706 SF grantea-Uy Zoning Admini'strator, biana Toughill,.in-1975,
and as affirmed in lwo letters received from Jay Peterson in L977 '."pla= of which three documents are enclosed herewith'
ThelettersfromMr.Petersonareunequivocalthattheallow-able GRFA as a result of Planning Commissi6n and Town Council meetings
i" SS,706 sF ana i would appreciite and request with this letter a
response from you "l-v""t L'arriest opporturiity 1" to the amount of
perrnissible cR1'A-yo., i.r""ive for f,ol- g, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch'
The topography of that Lot has not changed since l.975 ' I have
in hand a 20 page engineering report as a reiult of the diggilg of
seven test pits on r,5t 6 affirming th9 very stable and suitable nature
of the soil on that lot for standird form Lonstruction, and my sche-
matic developme"[-p:-""=, tt i"f, were shown to you in September of -1979 '
show that ,ro p.ofo!"a Uoifaing is sited upon any portion o! l-,9t 5 which
might exceed 30t'in sJ-ope, alfhough I haslel to.add that the degree of
slope should not be " rll".rarrt fa6tor in determining lot usage' I have
represented to several parties recently the allowable GRFA of 59,706 SF
on Lot 6, Block 2, Vail potato p-i.tt, ind would.appreciate your clarifi-
.itio' on this rnatter at your earliest opportuni-uy.
hn P.
JPH: Pbc
cc: Stewart H. Brown, Esg.
Enc.
Y
Ha11
-/l
LNoJ+
lown n
ryi:f
l|fll
bor 10O
vail, colorado 81657
(3031 47e5613
Apri'l '19,'1975
olf ice of the tonryt manag€r
tlr. John P. Hal I
Vail, Colorado
Re: Lots 't and 6, Block 2 and Lot 34, Elock 'l' Vaj'l Potato Patch
Dear llr. Ha I I :
At the request of Hr. Fred 0tto of vail Associates, I have.inade a pre-
liminary zoning review of the subiect sites and the following are general
restrictions of densities on the sites.
Lots 6 and 34 are zoned Medium Density Multiple Family whlch allcws a
iange of 15 to 30 units per acre and total gross-residentia'l floor area
ot i4,gZO square feet. i have circled the definition of GRFA in red
in thi attached zon'ing ordinance. Lot 6 wou'td al'low 59,706 square feet
and Lot 34 43,465 square feet of GRFA.
Lot I is zoned High Density Multiple Family which would-a'llow a range
of ZS to 50 units per acriand a total grols residential floor area of
f.t.t8te square feet.
The enclosed envjronnrental impact report nust also become a part of the
possible restrictions on the subiec'u sites. To my knowled-gg'.there are
no other contracts between Vail Associates and the Town of Vail which
would further restrict building.
If you have further questions, please feel free to contact our departnent'
Yours truly,
Hand Delivered to Fred 0tto
ELOPMENT ,
i ana S. Toughill
Admi n i strator
o I
riaotntcr 3. oTto
JAv t. ?crfaSox
JOx.. t. a L'SH
Orro, PernRsox & BrlsH
ATTOFNEYS AT LAW
POSr 0a rrc € eor 3,.9
vAIL, COLORIDo {Jt667
l'lovember 2, I977
Sincerely yours,
By:
-/4/
VAr L Ptrof f,S3,OnAL 3 Ut! gr rrc
430:l .;3 - OO9?
waarri E F| P,to.cssror{a! DUtt.otho(1O3, 9.9 - 5l€O
llr. John p. HaItSherrie John ManorI':echanicsburg, pA
Dear John:
The Town Council.met-last night at which time I pre_sented a compromise down-zoning for Lot O anj iot :n,Vail Potato patch. The followlng was passed by theTown CounciL for your two Lots:
1) The Medium Density Multi. Family Zonewas kept for both Lots.
2', 30 units will be allowed on Lot 6 and8 uni ts wi 1l be a I lorved on Lot 3 4 .
3) The allowable G.R.F.A. on LoL 6 willbe 59,706 sguare feet and 15,212 square.feet on Lot 34.
4') I have a_oreed to give up your recre_ational amenities and ybur cramway onTract C. After this down_zoningr fouwill have no further interesr on Tract C.
The next meeting for the second reading will be oniJovember L5th, I977. however, I foresee no furtherdifficulties.
If you have any questionsr please contact my office.
JKP: pf
Peterson
I
Project Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Cot+Do
Project Application
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legat Descripti on rct A , arccx ? , riting
Comments:
l/
,^," lfa B Il/
-,,.-\ -t,r
Design Review Board
APPROVAL
+Sr;--
(tlot RccePtaute)
I
I
Subd'ivi s'i on
Lot
B'lock
Filing
r. subrd!!rl-ll4!
Agrebment (if aPPlicalrle) ----
z - Enqi neeri ng-Erglllsme4!
[t]3lll:*r'l',iorru-''";-0rc"'r-=rc:tq-zz-
' - ,rr:1:+jeS3. Sourqi- il-g!t-:=-
a
r
D
L
EI
--;;-'*M=-
(AccePtabl e)4
itt**hr
tr
El ectri c
Gas
Se'rter
l,later
Tel ePltorie
T.V.
Connetrts:
:W=9.
i'i e t t.r.t t iiliogJlnqtr-t-l
ApProved:
Di saPProved:
BilI Arrdre:':s
a.r o
Mountain Bell
.Roon 113
427 E. Colorado Av.
Colorado Sprlngsr' Co. 80903
November 161 1981
Barney FixEI Dorado Engioeerlng
823 Blake Av.
Glenwood Sprirys, Co. 81601
Dear Sirs:
As requested in our telephone conversatiou oa Friday, November 13r 1981t
the lofomation requlred by Eagle Gouaty follows.
Tfre 770 Potatoe Patch ProJect belng bullt at 770 Potatoe Patch ln
vai1, Golorido wtll be provlded telephone service from tbe. vall excbange
offlce of Mouatain BelI Telephoae CoBPany.
Mountaln Del1 is a public utility subject to regulatloa by the colorado
Publie Utilities Cormrission and the Federal Coumunlcatlons CosmissLon.
Telephone facilities have not been exteaded !o this Development rror can
any comitmeut be made as to rdren they will be available. Extension of
our plaot loto ttris area depends uPoo nuterous factors, such as our
capital requireoents aud ablllty to raise capital. Thl's would also
depend on the avallablllty of maapower and supplles, potential use of
the feclllties, and the econmic feasibility of provldl'ng setvLce. Most
of our constructl.on work Ls sdreduled in the spring and stmer months.
Since the 770 Potatoe Patch ProJect is wlthla close proxlmlty of
telephooe faclllties, construction charges w111. not aPPly.
If additional information is needed, please call Barbara Galloway at
636-4806.
Yours truly,g.u&'ry
B. Galloway /
Suoervisor Residence
luwn n
75 loulh trontage rd.
Yail, colorado 81657
(303) '176-7000
lltl
e'T
department of community development
July 'l ,
,|982
Jennifer Lowel I
EI Dorado Engineering
823 B'lake
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 8l 601
Re: Unit I
Dear Ms. Lowel I :
The staff approves the retain'ing wall and roof overhang encroachnentinto the setback for un'it one, 770 Potato Patch. The reta'ining
wall and overhang should not go beyond four feet into the setback.
Thank you for your concern.
S i ncerel y,
,%fiM SAYRE
Pl anner
JS: br
,'770 Potato Patq
Li
i /\
l;rlitf tv l:;lor'l 770 Potato Patch
.rolr NAHt:
t,o'r lll,offi 2 F il..tNG Val'l Pot$o Patch
,ruirtrnss 770 Pdtato Patch Drlve
Tlre loca t i.on
I irr es, ltnrst
accompanying
of utilitics, wltcthcr thcy bo lnlj.n trunk
bc approvcd and vcrificd by thc llollowing
sitc plan.
Authorized
-SiSnatttra
l-tountain llel l
lrlesterrr Slope Gas
Public Scnricc Company'
lloly Cross Electric Assoc.
Vail CabIe T.V.
Upper Eagle VallcY rratcr
and Sanita-t ion District
li.ncs or proposedutilitics for thc
Dato
tru/
r tr 6-t//
/-/!z*/
.: t
NOTE: These verifications do not relieve the contrac.tor of his
responsibility'to obtain a street cut Permit from the
Town .of Vail, Departnient of Public lVorks and to.obtain
of-way or easement in the Town of Vail . A building pernit
is not a street cirt pernit. A street cut Pernit nust be
obtained separately.
.,This fonn is to vcrify senrice availablity.and location.
This should be used in conjunction with preparing your
utility plan and scheduling installatlons.
; i'l r'l .l
llr,... r ..
lri:: | , ll'lI'
tl
rrl'l'l' '1.
r(il 4'ruA'rcrl
31 rrnifs
llfi I Vlrj
2 | lr l ,,
at,tached horne
.!'l'l(l
rl
vnrrzrpln'lo!['crr
development
'l lrt' l',r|1,,1.in:i ilrl,,:ir:rl irrrr i..
llo t'tl lrr'!rr: r. it I irr,rl ;rgr;rlrrt,;r I
A. l;llll.!r I;;r; iii' l'l:llli'l,Ji
lloo ll
Sj rl ing
Othcr l'iirl I i'lat cri u I s
l:ascia
Soffi.ts
lVindor.rs
l{indovr 'I'rinr
Doors
Door'l'rim
l{and or: Dcc}. llai I s
Flues
Flash j ng,s
Chinneys
Trash Enclosurc!
Grccnhorrs es
0ther
_l,lt:q: ..,: l,_.ll''. t .''' i j'.!_
lr.r1ttirr.rl l'or' ::ttlrr;,itt;rl I'y lltr: :rgr;rlii';1q11 to lltc l)rr:; ir:rr lir.f i1 ,,.;
t rr rr lr(: 11 i v<:tt:
.(:t,j-t't
brownt..-e$-geyg_l
1 x redwood sealed
8. LANDSCAPING
Name of Designer:
Phone :
PLANT MATERIALS
TREES
h7 6- 17 OL
Botanical Name
see landscape plan
Synthetic stucco beige
rough sawn plywood sealed
wood dark brown
wood. - dark brown
' sealed
wgod-re.dwgod seale.9 -
melal" lipe rail dark brown
metal beiSe or dark brown
n/a
anodized aluminum bronze or dark brown
Conmon Name Si zeQuanti ty
thetic stucco
SIIRUBS
nlqlliln. ,
covLt(5
see landscap€plan sau/O toor^.r;l:
s0D see landscape Plan
TYPE see landscape plan
SQUARE FOOTAGE
SQUARE FOOTAGESEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD
OF EROSION CONTROL
see I andsr:ane nlan
C. 0ther Landscape Featur.es (retainlng walls, fences, swlmmlng poolsr etc.) P'lease specify.
retaining walls to enclo'se project - stucco or wood
pool - see plans
water course
bridge - see plans
B' lltIl.Iililinll"o."p"g iri'teriats incrrrdinly 'rl'c,r.':., l,rrr, a'<r G;.ot,rrr covci^)
Ilotanical Nane Common Namc
Plcea Pungens Col . Spruce
Plnus Latlfolla'contorta' Lodgepole plne
Populua Treguloldee 4spen
Rosg-$oqgell -__.-
Rlle_glrpIqup_
Rubus Dellclosue
Potentllla I'rutlcosa
Potentllla Frutlcoaa
'lft';!ve1.egt l._-_-'
Betula Occldentalls
llal-ue Dolga
an'18
11
74?
----Ug4-B.eee ---. - .14
_Alplne _gqeg!* .l? ____
_ . Thlnble.bgtly___ _3-2 __
Clnquefoll 85
48 12,-14'
30 -ljr';16'
52 2 'r-3" cal .t? j"z.h" ca]-.
#5__
#5_ _
t5__-
#5
Si zc
14'- 18'-T2t:16,
14'-16'
Mt. Everlet 42
' *--€lnqrcfoll. .-- -." "
t$eatern Bed Blrch
Dolga Crabapple
#5
t7
l2
#5
Zr-Ja cat-
\j
be Hlgh Altltude nlrture as supplled by
ir\:lj. rrl- l;
l,l.(;i i, !..
lriii;( :l' I l''l l{
r'.t,
ill;'.. i.it
,lj l'l!o., 1.(: i
ttoutoT PATCH DNIVE
;.'1, 2 lll.t.:i,t,VAlL/POT ATCH
.. -.31. Unifs-atiached houre dev.el.opuenl-- -
'llrc' fol lr'1;l11f ittt 'rlt::rrl irrrt i.,
lloarcl lrt'l,rrt: it J itlr I ;t;t1l1t;vir I
A. littll,l,li;r; l.l4l'l;ltll.l,J;
lloof
Siding
Othcr liall ivlal crials
Fascia
Soffits
Windovrs
llindovr 'I'rirr
Doors
Door l'rin
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chirmeys
Tra sh Encl osures
Greenhous es
0ther
B. LANDSCAPING
Name of Designer:
Phone :
PLANT MTERIALS
TREES
rr.rlrtirt'tl l'or s;r.tlrr;rit Llr I lry l lt<: irppl it':rnl. to thc J)t::;i11rr li,r.v.i t.,rr
crr rr Ilc lliv(ln:
1;-.pe o f_il'r t I ..l.,rjf I (ioIor
@- - ure!s1@'gt--ulr+.'rr.9-
-I!0-EOggoq_--No. 1.--_ seale4-
Synlhelic stucco - ST0 B5B7 beige * grey
rough sawn plywood seafed
wood clad dri-ftwood by Peachtree
wood clad driftwood bv Peachtree
wood sealed
r'rnnd-r'c4r^reod _ . - . .qealffl _
.r"f "'l ni n" t ai 'l - wood
Urefal -dark brgwn , - -
rne tql _ _ . beipe Erev or dark brown to natc
wall
srrnthetic stucco STO.B58J Leiee Arev
n/a
.anodized +lumlnum - b.ronze or dark brylrn
Aq!'aAe doors painfed fo Etch stucco - beige grey
wall screens - painted to match stucco beinge grey
Si.vertson anC ,Ass
Ir16-1'rCL
Botanica'l Name Common Name Quanti ty Sl ze
^see 'l andscrFc fr'l en
see landscape p1-anSHRUBS
6i:01rrtn . .$ee.funqurg;1lpfeo -cOvLRs
sQunPrr,rrrnl: -_---- . -
s0D see I rndsr-enc Dlanvvv +qrrsvvsPv I SQUARE FOOTAGE
SEED TYPE see ra,-'d=eaf,,e lra.' SQUARE F00TAGE
TYPE 0F underground sprinkl-es system
IRRIGATION
TYPE 0R METHOD see landscape plan
OF EROSION CONTROL
C. 0ther Landscape Features (retaining wa1'ls, fences, swimming poo1s, etc.) Please specify.
I"piaifl-ing w: l l< to ann] Oqa projaet - ctUCCn nl. r.'nnd
-----Sgteining
wa] | s heiwecn ctr'l dpsr.s - <f r\na fAaing
- FcnL--sce Flans
__ cv r sr.r ng werer collr,_qe - see p t,ans _
__ hnidge - stone facing-
TO
sNOwDoN and HOPKIO
ARCHITECTS
201 Gore Creek Drive P. O. Box 1998
LETrtro@F TRANSnnITTAL
the following items:
GENTLEMEN:
WE ARE SENDING YOU
tr Shop drawings
X Copy of letter
X Attached
,!i erints
n Change order
D Under separate cover via
.! Plans E Samples tr Specifications
C
VAIL COLORADO 81657
f303',t 47F.22OL
coPlEs DATE NO.DESCRIPTION
4 Ft/j4/4/r
0 'ltafihl n ,rft fwu|ffln{ lhrrrla r
?/nia'fgytat/a 'i,trr
c 9I/7/qlh /
/I a fu.trzrufarhn-W tf;,/,,rz
T
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
E For approval
I For your use
E As requested
tr Approved as submitted
E Approved as noted
E Returned for corrections
Resubmit-copies for approral
Submit-copies for distribution
Return-corrected prints
n
D
tr
O For revie\ry and comment D
O FOR BIDS DUE 19- C PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
COPY TO
SIGNED:
FOnM 2||{>2 - Av.lhblr tron /@ Iom..f'dl Mr.. Ol4Og la ancroasrlt aaa rot aa ,rot.d, klndlyt noliflt ua tt onca-
o Project Appllcatlon
Proiect Name:
Project Description:
Contacl Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
h'*
*'".
s
fIl
i atocx ? , riting
Design Review Board tl
n.,A lz/z t/
DISAPPROVAL:-o
Summary:
lt
1..'! ::. t
I l'.. . i .
! ; i , : : r . , ' i | ' I | , . : ;
PorAoPArcH
. l' : i
31 units
DRIVE
.2. lti.t.',
allached home
I tv
.,;
ri
VAIL/IOTATO PATCH
development
'l lrr,. f',rll,'l;i1jl itrl',1i:::rt i,rt| i..
lkritrrl lrci'lr',. tr t irr:rl ;tIPttry;1 |
A. l:illl.lri;:r; i.ii'fl:l:1.,'tl,l;
lloo f
Sj <lj ng
Othcr l',itl I i'lu1 cliul s
l:ascia
Soffi t s
l{indor.rs
Ittindor.r 'I'rinr
lloors
Door'l'rirn
llancl or Dcck llails
Flues
Flashi ngs
Chinncys
Trash Encl osures
Glecnhorrs es
0ther
lr.riuif('rl l'or' ::trlrr;,iltir I lry llrt: r r ; r 1 r I i ,. ' : r r t t ltl tltc l)t::; ir:rr llr'1'j11,'
t'l r rr b(: ,l iv(:tt:
tg_"1.{-_ry9-u--"_}
1 x redwood
f:1,_l-1t1
brown
Synthetic stucco beige
rough salrn plywood sealed
wood dark brown
r.rnnrr dark brown.-gtlyL-_-_
r.z'',.rrl SeaIeO%
q90d-re.dw993- --egaleg----
metal pi!e--rail- -- - --dark brown
.-metal - Slark brown
metal beige or dark brown
n/a
anodlzed aluminum bronze or dark brown
Q'i rrorl <nn and Asenni af e<
L'?6-1?OL
Botanical Name Cormon Nanre Quanti ty Si ze
_-see_le!3-E!g-E_[an
-_-p e.9._!eg3 gg.qe_-plan
sealed
B. LANDSCAPING
Name of Designer:
Phone :
PLANT MATERIALS
TREES
tic stucco
SIIRUBS
Gt:0tiiln
cOvr-t(5
s0D
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGAT ION
see Landscape prt s0u rcr(lrLf.iJ:
see ]andscape plan SQUARE FOOTAGE
see landscape Plan SQUARE F0oTAGE
rrndangnolnd spr"i nklens s:rstem
TYPE
see I andscaoe olanTYPE OR NETHOD
OF EROSION CONTROL
c.Other Landscape Features (retaining walls,
netainine walls to enclose project -
fences, swlrmlng pools' etc.) P'lease specify.
stucco or wood
pool - see plans
water course
t2,-^
t
-/ -I
4/,77o fu kla
fufl,|
v'M.S/E: ,3,72 4a /46e.at
fitlafut&Z F+' /%,ez-s, eUr o/stucr: Oiln'r
fr.A^mA * e U/Y/Z.S; <b * /Atar, oNlT
44afi$
,h%cln r e?7'fu rSr&le
,SE aa/%€ . /f.4m:3o2,
AaF,Sf',&.nF
76t 837/
4
.f/4a49tZ &e4r
sez<ss #
6ptlr
-
ir
I'
g4- -e2-e' Ze,
A/Y,
lNrA /?%d XGa /?6r( nt. Y?c /sqi / xC9 /7F3F X;F /7t6 4 YZr /7<7d xz
= //p76
T tee
//,6{
?7tse7/6
Sst t
E tt,
?e
6lt
€/a?,
- 2-
- - r --z-
v
/777Nt x 2 =/ft/ qb X -i =
0.{t7i 6@ C
sEsv
4Lgs
Gee@
k{a:
* ttttT- 2 ,C : lz
O u't//r -zxl =8
C c4t7-?)(6 =/Z
O u,tftT - zxt
E ortr - z,fz
f u,ftT _ ?xz e gTEt {
6 tJrt/l -L X?- = V
114)r-/tr ez x3 = 6
betl
6t
: &'& ,-yQs!
766444;: /t-/fr7r6 ?zzz
6-t€lot vV 417L
c - 7aa7 Y6 6fzz
u/a/r- 7{r t - 7f/ Y€ -/Q7o
?z-s 6 - /2oz YZ 2ft1/
/t6o p- Tfzy? /a/1
4 - //Of Yz 22 to €8,s7 7ft-/7o3 x3 stuf
=
7-
ENGINETRING CHEEK LIST
o
(Acc
Subdivision
Lot
Bl ock
Fi1in9
1. Submittal Items
(A) Topo llaP(B) site Plan(c) utility Plan
(D) Title llePort
(E) Subdivision Agreement
2. Enqineering Requirements
Arn o &rot
62_
(tiot Acceptable)eptabl e)
(if applicable)
(n) cu'lvert Sjze
i s i o il v e\r'ay G ra d e--t 87-, nlax f-[ETuel)
3. Source of Utilities
l.
(A
(Blr
ln
(E
(F
El ectri c
Gas
Se'rler
l,la ter
Tel epl:crie
T. V.
4.':corrunents : @-fuue,y-.< e p o2tuetryE 62oeo-Luzx-OK
Approved:
Di sapproved:
Der,artn::ni of Publ i c l'Jorks
Bi I I Arrdre:'rs
Vail Investments
evelopment, Ltd.
&
DNovember 10, 1981
Town of VailMr. Peter PatEen
Conmunity Development
Box l-00Vail, CO 81658
Dear Peter:
Pursuant to our telephone conversation this after-
noon, please be adviied that revegecatiol-wilL b-e
done on Lot 6, Potato Patch by May 1, L982, in the
event Ehat we do not develop the property next
spring.
If you have any quesEions, please do not hesitate
to contacu me.
Sincerely yours,
VAIL INVESTMENTS & DEVELOPMENT, LTD.
^li,a.W---.r
i JoUn B. Thomas
lGeneral Partner
/ar
///bk/
Box 696 / Vail, Colorado 81657 / (303) 476-0250
.'.
i:r.
:;rJlrt) IV l:;l of.:770 Potato Patch
.r0t] I'rAi,il:
l,o'f RI,O(K
rtuiutt:ss 770 Pdtato Patch Drive
FTI"ING Vai'l Potato Patch
Tlrc locat i.on of util j-ties,
lines, llust irc irpprovcd and
acconpanyi.ng sitc plan.
l'lountain pel l
h'estern Slope Gas
Public Senrice Company'
lloly Cross Electric Assoc.
Vail Cable T.V.
Upper Eagle Valley flater
and Sanitation District
r,rhcthcr thcy bo nt:.r.in trunk
vcrificd by the following
Authorized
Sicnattlre...r-.:_
lincs or proposedutilitics for the
Dato
--:
1m//
/t-t63/
//:/ 4 Y/
r
. NOTE: These verifications do not relieve the contractor of his
responsibility to obtain a street cut permit from the
Town.of Vail, DePartment of Public ltlorks and to obtain
t utility locations before digging in any public right-
i - . rr^!'r a r-..:r -' of-way or easenent in the Torm of Vail . A bttilding permit
is not a street clt permit. A street cut Permit nust be
obtained separately.
.,Thir form is to verify service availablity and location.
This should be used in conjunction rvith preparing your
utility plan and scheduling instaLlations.
)7
a Project Appllcation
Project Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPBOVAL DISAPPROVAL
;;ti
'l
r-ir,* .-
Town Planner E Statl Approval
tnwn
department of community development
November 5, 1981
Mr. John ThomasP.O. Box 696
Vail, CO 81658
Dear John:
since you,ve installed your access road and culverted the
drainage on Lot O, notaio Patch, at tbis late date, we would'
li.ke you to re-vegetate the exposed dirt areas that you've \
distuiUed in the process- I[e are requiring many proJects :to revegetate their disturbed areas ihis time of year so
that we wonrt have serious erosion control problems next
spring. This becomes especially important if you don't
start-construction first thing in the spring.
You should have ample time in the next week or so on that
slte to throw some seed down and put hay matting over it
before we get snowed in. Appreciate your cooperation, as
always, John.
Jr.
box lfl)
Yail, colorado 81657
(3{r3) 476€613
Peter Patten,
Senior Planner
c{rrordo €165t
?31
box 100
vait, colorado 81657
{303} 476-5613
John P. Hall
Sherrie John Manor
I'techanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055
Dear Mr. Ha1l,
Peter paiten
Solror plannet
Ocpartment of Communrly Developmenl
department of community developnrent
Fcbnrary 12, 1981
This is a
quest ionshistory of
response to your_)-efr€t of February 2,
on lot 6, BIscK'2, Vail Potato Patcly!)). ltve investigated the
Rider, Tom of Vail attorney.
At the November l, lg77 meeting of the Torr'n of Vail Council , it was agrccd
that the above lot would be allowed 30 dwelling units on the PrcPerty(also, they granted you 8 units on lot 34). However, there was no contl:act
entered into concerning tIE-ETTolv56I6T-ross Residential Floor Area (GRFA)
of the pl'operty. The l'ledi-un Density [ftrltiple Fanily (uDl'{F) Zone District
was designated as the applicable developnent standards (setbacks, height,
etc. ) for the lot.
Subsequent to this meeting, in May 1978, a lhzard OrcU.nance was passed
by the Tourr Cou:rcil whj.ch further affected rlcnsity and GIIFA on all propertie
(except Single Family and Duplex) in the Tor'm. It is the Town attorneyrs
opinion that the 40% slope restriction under this ordj-nance rvould apply
to your property \./ith regard to your allowable GRFA.
Ihus, the 30 unit figure l,til1 remain irr effcct, but the allowable GRFA
can only be determined by the subnission gf a topographic rnap stamPed wj-th
the seal of a licensed suxveyor, so that a1l areas of 4oga or more can be
subtracted out. luly computations from the trnofficial (unstan4red) topo nap
you subnitted in Septenber of 1979 sirorrr this figure to be in the area of
51 ,000 square feet.
n lot 6, BIocK-2, Vail Potato Patcll-fi. Irve investigated the
th' have discussed it with LarrY
PIease note that youfor a GRFA variancc
:- hental Conunission.is rny c:rrd.
Senior Irlanner
APP:bpr
may apply to the DePaltnent of Corrunr"rnity Development
which t.rould bc dctcrnrincd by the P) a:rning and Environ-
If I can be of furthcr assistance, please call--enclosed
cc Larry llidcr
, Jll
o
RonERT H.\TtlsoN
221 NoRTFT LA S,.\LLE STREET
CHrc,\co, ILLINoIS €o60l
3t2 -236 -E245
Decernber 18, 1979
It{r. Craig Snor,rden
Chairman, Design Review Board
c,/o Snowden & Hopkins, Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vai1, Co lorado 81657
Dear Mr. Snowden:
Re: Iot 34, Tract B, BLock 1
Iot 6, Block 2
Vai l,/Potato Patch Subdivision
I understanil that a plan has been subndtted to your Board for the
development of the above captioned lots. From the information I
received, it appears that a request for a change in the purpose use
of some of the land, particularly in Tract B, may be in the offing.
If a change of use is requested, I hope that a hearing will be helctto a1low all property owners in the subclivision to express their
opinions and recomnendatlons.
I worked closely with the Vail Associates representatives and was
assured both with documentation and verbalJ-y that the restrictions
would be enforced and that we could rely on the type of deve lopment
that the City of Vail and Vail Associates wish to see rnature in Potato
Patch.
I purposely sold rny condominium in Lions Head to get arniay from the
concrete jungle that was allowed to develop there. The trade for the
inconvenience and nnre difficult rnanagenent responsibilities was the
acguisition of greater privacy and quietness. It is nry understandingthat the uppe r tier lots in Potato Patch nere to be single family with
duplexes allowed although many of the buye rs prefer not to builil
duplexes.
I feel strongly whether I Live afl year around in VaiI or live part
time -- I pay the same real estate taxes as people who live al1 year
around. I must pay for the sane services to rnaintain qa property,
driveways, etc., as if r liveil there full time.
o
l{r. Craig Snowden
Page Trro
Deceober 18' 1979
As a prcperty o$ner I eqtect I wltl be dluly notifiecl of any rieetings
andt tlrat there will be a public hearing on any proposed change of
exlstLng zoning regulations, city policies andl,/or covenants of record.
Sincerely,
Robert H. wllson
cc: ltr. ChrLg Sivertson
li!r. Tom Hollis
ur. Fritu Glade
Ur. ECl Drager
-t r. ilim Rrbin
l{r. Ctrud< Donally!tr. Peter Patten
-.
-
BARRIE M. DAMSON
366 MAOIEiON AVENUE
NEW YORK, N, Y. IOO|7
Decenber 4, 1979
Mr. Craig Snowden
Chairngn, Design Revlew Board
c/o Snowden & Hopkins, Archltects
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Lot 34, Tract B, Block I
Lot 6, Bl-ock 2
Vail/Potato Patch SubdLvisl-on
Dear Mr. Snowden:
With regard to Mr. John llallrs proposed development of the subject
propertl.es, rre are specifically concerned about che plans for incorpor-
ating trto tennls courts, picnic tables, a pavilion and pathways in the
development of Tract, B referenced above. It is our understandLng that
Mr. Hall- was directed by the Design Review Board to revise his originaL
plan and that at this tine no specific proposals are avallable for re-
vlew by any of the l-nterested parties, including the Design Review
Board, the Town of Vall staff and the property ovrners.
Any developrnent of Tract B, and especially the uses proposed in
Mr. I{a11ts plan, could have a dlrect effect on the proPerty value and
present seclusion of adJacent properties. Therefore, because of our
coDcern and that of other property or^tners rtith whon we have discussed
the matter, Lt. would be appreciated if you would notify us' as well as
the other property orrners in the Potato Patch subdlvision, of the date
on which the next review of John Hallrs proposed plan will take place
since ne believe that cornments from aLL oarties who will be affected
should be taken into consideration.
cc: Chris Sivertson,
Torn llol-llsFrltz Glade
Ed Drager
Jim Rub ln, Town
Design Revlewtt tl
tt rl
It tt
of Vail- Staff
Mr. and Mrs.
Board
tl
ll
tl
rrie M. Damson
m**lluue* High Prupenilr$, il*d,
Robert Serofin
7310 lslond Circle
Boulder, CO 80301
303/530.0892
cc: Larry Mullin
Craig Snow:len
Chris Sivertson
lorry Mullin
P.O. 1604
Voil, C0 81557
303/476.30e4
7 December 1979
Mr. Luc Meyer
813 Potato Patch Road
Vai1, Colorado 81657
Re: Lot 34, Tract B, BLock 1
Lot 6, Block 2
ValL/Potato Parch Subdiviston
Dear Luc,
Thanks very much for your letter of November 9 apprising us ofthe status of proposed development of the above referenced property.
Larry Mullln and I, as general partners of llountain High Properties
which owrrs Lot 21, Block 2, were shocked to hear of the proposal for
developrnent of portions of Tract B for the exclusive use of a select
subset of the property owners in the Potato Patch. lloreover, it was
disrnaylng to learn that this proposal, made without infonning Potato
Patch ovmers, would be considered by the Design and Review Board.
It is our belief and desire that Tract B should remain as
undeveloped green belt ia perpetul-ty for the enj oym.ent and use of all
Potato Patch propelty onners. If the deveLopers of l,ots 34 and 6
trrish to have private tennis. courts, picnic areas, or extra parkingit seems that these amenities should be placed on Lots -34 and 6 and
.not . on . greenbelt land which has been lntended. for the general use. ofall residents in the subdivision.
I agree w'ith you that- defaeing of Tract B as proposed would havea detrlmental affect on the'general quiet atmosphere now enJ oyed by.Potato Patch resi.dents and lrould adversely affect property values 1nthe area. I,Ie don?t need a tennis court, paddle ball court, swirmningpool, pavillons, etc., on every square foot of open space in Vall.Letts leave some to Mother Nature.
If I can help you further in roatters related to this issue Iwill be happy to do so. Again, thanks very much for acting in ourinterests and those of other owners in the Potato Patch.
Torn llollis
Fritz Glade
Ed Drager Peter Patten
Rogenr H.'J/tlsoN
221 NoRTFt L,.. .SALLE STREET
cr{rc,1co, ILLrNors 6060l
312 -236 - 82 a5
December 18, 1979
!lr. Craig Snor^7den
Ctrairmal, Desigm Revi ew Board
c,/o Snowden & Hopkins, Architects
20I Gore Creek DriveVail, Oolorado 81657
Dear Mr. Snowden:
Re: Iot 34, Tract B, Block 1
Iot 6, Block 2
vail,/Potato Patch Subclivision
I unilerstand that a plan has been subnitted to your Board for the
development of the above captioned 1ots. From the information I
received, it appears that a request for a change in the purpose use
of some of the land. particularly in Tract B, may be in the offing.
If a change of use is requested, I hope that a hearing wilL be helilto allow all property owners in the subdivision to express thej.r
opinions and recornnendations.
I worked closely with the vail Associates representatives and was
asstrre tl both with documentation and verbally that the restrictions
would be enforced and that we could rely on the type of deve loprnent
that the City of Vail and Vail Associates wish to see mature in Potato
Patch.
I purposely sold my condominium in Lions Head to get away from the
concrete jungle that was allowed to develop there. The trade for the
inconvenience and rpre difficult management responsibilities vtas the
acquisition of greater privacy and quietness. It is ny understanding
that the uppe r tier lots in Pot.ato Patch were to be sLngle family with
duplexes allowed although many of the buye rs prefer not to build
duplexes.
I feel strongly whether I live all year around in Vail or live part
time -- I pay the same real estate taxes as people who live all year
around. I must pay for the same services to maintain ny property 'driveways, etc., as if I lived there full time.
a o
!8. Cralg Snosden
Page '[\do
Decernber 18, 1979
AE a pnoPerty oryner I sq)ect I wilt be duly notifieal of any neetings
and that ttrere will be a public hearl'ng on any proposed change of,
eristlng zoring regUlations, city policies and/or covenants of recorrdl.
SincerelY,
Robert H. wilson
cc: litr. Chrls SLvertson
l,!r. Tom Hollie
!,tr. ISritz Glade!{r. Ed D!.ager
!,tr. atin tbbin
-.!,tr. Chuck Donally
!tr. Peter Patten
)
29 October 1979
Mr. Craig Snowden
Chalrrnan, Deslgn Revlew Board
c/o Snowden & Hopklns, Architects
201 Gore Creek Drlve
Val1, C0 81657
Cltizen lnput, we belleve, ls nost
every effort Eo see to lt that you
matter. Flnally, please notlfy us
has been requested by Mr. Hall.
Block 1
Subdlvlsion
important ln thls case. Again, please make
recelve as much lnput as posslble regardlng this
by telephone as soon as a review hearing date
Re: Lot 34, Tract B,
Lot 6, Block 2
vall/Potato Patch
Dear Cralg:
Recently we have become ar^rar e that Mr. John Hall has proposed a development plan
for the above referenced properties. 0f speclal lnterest and concern to us ls
the proposed developnent of Tract B incorporating 2 tennis court.s, picnic
tables, a pavilion and pathways. In conversations with several other property
_owners and residents of the area, our concern seems to be shared. However,
because Mr. Hall was dlrected by the Deslgn Review Board to revise hlsorlglnal plan, no speciflc proposals are presently available for review byeirher the Towrr of Vall staff, the Design Revi ew Board or property or,tners '
For several reasons, lncludlng Ehe Townrs comnitment t.o preserve and acqulre
narural open space, the uncertalnty regardlng Mr. Hallrs proposed use of Tract B'
the poEentlal problems assoclated wiEh the development and use of Eennis courts
and plcnlc facllltles, and the concerns of adjacent property ovrners as to ho\^t
these proposals may tffect the value and enj oyrnent of their properEy, we ask that
you make every effort to notlfy the other owners 1n the Potato Patch Subdlvislon
as to the date of the next review of Mr. Hallrs proposed plan so that you may
receive sufficient citlzen lnput.
The lrnpact of this plan to develop Tract B may have substantlal effects on other
property owners ln the area. The orlglnal prot.ectlve covenants of the Potato Patch
Subdlvlslon call for revlew of all proposed lmprovements ln the subdlvlslon by
an architectural revlew comrittee. It ls our underetanding that that review
conmltteers responsib llitlee have been aeslgned to the Town of Vall Design Revlew
Board.
We wlll apprecLate your tlmely response and Lrmnedlate attentLon to this matter.
cc. Chrls Severson, Tom Hollls, Jlm Morgan,
Enc losure
Georges Boye
Frltz clade
f{6
29 0ctober 1979
Mr. Cralg Snowden
Chalrrmn, Deslgn Revlew Board
c/o Snowden & Hopkins, Architects
201 Gore Creek Drlve
Va1l, C0 81657
Re: Lot 34, Tract B, Block 1
Lot 6, Block 2 lVall/Potato Patch Subdlvlslor}/
Dear Craig:
Recently we have become aware that Mr. John Hall has proposed a development plan
for the above referenced propertles. 0f speclal l-nterest and concern to us ls
the proposed developnent of Tract B incorporatlng 2 tennis courts, plcnlc
tables, a pavllion and pathways. In conversatlons with several other property
o\rners and resldents of the area, our concern seems to be shared. However,
because Mr. Hall was directed by the Deslgn Revlew Board to revise hlsorlglnal plan, no speclflc proposals are presently avallable for revlew byeither Ehe Town of Vall staff, the Deslgn Revl-ew Board or properEy owners.
For several reasons, lncludlng Ehe Townrs commicmenE Eo preserve and acqulre
natural open space, the uncerEalnty regarding Mr. Hall's proposed use of Tract B,
the potentlal problerns assoclated \rlEh the development and use of tennls courts
and plcnlc facl1ltles, and the concerns of adJacent property or^rners as to how
these proposals may affect the value and enJ oymenr of thelr property, we ask that
you make every effort to notlfy the other ounera Ln the Potato Patch Subdlvlsion
as to the date of the next revlew of Mr. Hallrs proposed plan so that you may
recelve sufflclent citizen lnput.
The lmpact of thls plan to develop Tract B may have substantial effects on otherproperty o\rners in the area. The orlginal protective covenants of the Potato Patch
Subdlvlelon call for review of all proposed lnprovenents in the subdivlslon by
an archlEectural revlew comlt.tee. It ls our undersEanding that that review
commlcEee's respons Lb lL it ies have been asslgned to the Town of Vail Design Revlew
Board.
Cltizen lnput, we belleve, is mosE
every effort to see Eo 1t thaE youmatter. Flnally, please notify us
has been requested by Mr. Hall.
important ln thls case. Again, please make
receive as much input as posslble regardlng Chls
by telephone as soon as a review hearlng date
We will appreclate your ti.nely response and lmnedlace attention to chis matEer.
cc. Chrls Severson, Ton Hollls, Jim Morgan, Fritz Glade
Enc l-osure
Georges
tiF
#$Jlounleln S0igh Prop
a
erlles
Roberl Serofin
7310 lslond Circle
Boulder, C0 80301
303i530.0892
cc: Larry Mullin
Craig Snowden
Chrls Sivertson
Ton llollis
Frirz Glade
Ed Drager
, [$d,
lorry Mullin
P.0. 1604
Voil, C0 81657
303/476-3094
7 December 1979
Mr. Luc Meyer
813 Potato Patch Road
Vail , Co1-orado 81657
Dear Luc,
Thanks very much for your l-etter of November 9 apprlsing us of
the status of proposed development of the above referenced property.
Larry Mullin and I, as general partners of Mountaln High Propertiesvhich owns Lot 21, Block 2, nere shocked to hear of the proposal for
development of portions of Tract B for the excluslve .use of a selectsubset of the property owners in the Potato Patch. Moreover, it wasdisnaying to learn that thls proposal", made wi.thout informlng Potato
Patch owners, would be consldered by the Design and Review Board.
It ls our belief and deslre that Tract B shoul-d remain as
undeveloped green be1-t in perpetuity for the enj oyrnent and use of all
Potato Patch property or^rners. If. the developers of Lots 34 and 6
wLsh to have private tennis.court.s, picnic areas, or extra parkingit seems that these amenities should.be placed on Lots.34 and 6 and. .. :'
not oa greenbelt Lan{ which has.been Lntended for the general .use ofall residents in the subdivislon.
I agree with you that defacing of Tract B as proposed would havea detrimental affect on the general qulet atmosphere now enjoyed byPotato Patch residents and would adversely affect property val-ues inthe area. I{e dontt need a tennis court, paddle ball court, swimming
poo1, pavilions, etc., on every square foot of open space in Vail.Letrs leave some to Mother Nature.
If I can help you further in matters related to this issue fwill be happy to do so. Again, thanks very much for ac tI-ng in ourinterests and those of other o$rners in the potato patch.
k Donnally
PeEer Patten
L J
c.TRAVIS TRAYI,OR, JR.
CHAIRMAN OF THE EOARO
FIRST MOBTGAGE COMPANY
oF TEXAS, lNC.
52s-7000
P. O. BOX 1413. HOUSTON, TEXAS 77OOl
November 26' L979
DIRECT LINE
525-7't 60
I
I!
!1r. Craig Snowden
Chairnan, Deslgn Review Board
c/o Snowden & IloPkins, Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vall, Colorado 81557
Ref r,ot 34, Tract B, Block t \\ Lot 5, Block 2 \
\ vat1/rotato Patch subdlvlsion]\_t
Dear Cralg:
I understand that a plan has been submltted to your Board for
the developrnent of the above captioned lots. Fron the informa-
tion I recllved, it appears that a requesL for a change in the
purpose use of some of the land, partlcularly in Tract B' may
be in the offing.
If a change of use is requested I hope Lhat a hearing wlll be
held to ailow all proPerEy owners in the subdlvision to exPress
their opinlons and recouurendations '
Prior to my purchaslng Lot 27, Block I in the PoEato Patch
Subdlvl,sion, I personall-y uade at l-east 5 trlps to Val-l' DurLng
those trips I lnspected every vacant lot for sale in the entire
town of ValI. I eonsulted with a number of real estate agents t
bullders, archltects and knowledgable buslnessmen ln the com-
munlty to ascertain whether Potato Patch was in fact a Flrst
RateDevelopnentandlftherestrictionslJeresuchthatthe
property values would be protected'
oneofmyprlmerequisitesl'astofindanareawlthlowdensity
restrictio;s. The development of vall wlth hlgh density construc-
tion \ras of alarm to me and I was concerned that the Village of
Vailmaybeulttmatelycompl-etedasa''concretejungle''.Ihope
thle rtill not haPPeo.
I arn in the mortgage banking buslness and full-y aPPreciate all
ofthefactorsthataffectPropertyvalues.Iama]-solnthe
:
;
!1r. Craig Snowden
November 26, L979
Page Two
Residential Lot DeveloPment buslness in Houston' My cornpany
has completed the development of ovei 25,000 residential lots
in the llouston Metropolitan Area'
You may recall that Uouston is the only major clty l-n the
uniteil states without zoning. our property l-s protected by
individual subdivision restrlctlon, which when approved by
the city become the governlng ordinance' It is therefore'
extremely imPortant that Property o\tners can rely on restrLc-
tions approved prior to the subdivlsion plat recording'
I realize that reasonable requests for changes are necessary.
I also recognlze thaE revlew boards are usually made up of un-
pald volunteers who give their time unselfishJ-y only to be
criticized bY nearlY everYone.
ThepurposeofnyletterlstorequesttheRevlel'BoardtotakeintoconslderatlontheviewsoftheproPertyoldnersandtogive
the owners a chance to revLew the request for any proposed
changes or deviation from the existing restrlctLons' If open
land'is used (as a change ln the restrictlons) the followlng
questions come to ml nd:
1. Will the imProvements be available to all
subdlvision owners?
2. What will the cost be?
3. Will it be an lncrease to the ProPerty owners
tax base?
4. W111 aLl owners be taxed or only those who elect
to use the faclllties?
5. W111 the proposed faclll-tles be an attraetlve
nuisance ?
6.wlllthefacilltiesattractoutsideusers(Poachers)
reducing the owners qulet enj oyment of their property?
7. Who w111 rnonitor the use, upkeep and management of
the facilities?
These are Just some of the questlons that come to mind' Many
of the ProPerty ovrners of existing houses live outslde Val1 and
any attiaciion which may unreasonable- increase use of restricted
ptop.tty could result in securl-ty problems'
Mr. Craig Snowden
November 25, L979
Page Three
I hope to be a ProPerty ormer ln the Potato Patch for many
;.;;'"-.;A r torria ;'tt" to 'ee any type of change thst may
adversely affect Property values of llving condltlons -wlthin
the area. I am at pt"""ttt attemPtlng to Purchase addltlonal
nrlplti"-i" ttre suuirvlsion for lhe construction of another
residence.
I certainly warrt to be constructive in my views anf i,n Do ltay
;";;-;; i."trr". the righrs of orhers-so long as their requests
"i"-r.it,-i"""or,"Ur" ""i r" keeplng with the overall- develop-
nent sch;me origlnallY Planned'l
I
i
cci Mr. Chris Slvertson
Mr. Tom llollls
Mr. Fritz Glade
Mr. EiI Drager
- !tr. Jlm Rubln ,/Mr- Chuck DonallY /
1"1r. Peter Patten
29 October 1979
Mr. Craig Snowden
Chairman, Design Revlew Board
c/o Snowden & Hopklns, Architects
201 Gore Creek Drlve
Va11, C0 81657
Re: Ilot 34, Trqgt B, ploc\_1
Lot 6, Dl_og_k 2
Val1/Potaco Pacch Subdlvlslon
Dear Craig:
Recently we have become aware that Mr. John Hall has proposed a development plan
for the above referenced propertles. 0f speclal interest and concern to us ls
rhe proposed development of Tract B lncorporatlng 2 tennis courts, picnic
tables, a pavilion and paEhways. In conversations with several other property
owners and resldents of the area, our concern seems to be shared. Ilowever,
because Mr. Hall was dlrecEed by the Deslgn Revlew Board to revlse his
orlglnal plan, no speclflc proposals are presently aval1ab1e for revlew byeither the Town of Vall staff, the Deslgn Revlew Board or property ouners.
For several reasons, including the Townre comnitment to preserve and acquire
natural open space, the uncertalnty regardlng Mr. I{al1rs proposed use of Tract B,
the pot.entlal problems assoclated vlth the development and use of tennls courts
and picnic facillties, and the concerns of adJacent property owners as to how
these proposals may tlf fect the value and enJ oyrnent of their property, we ask that
you make every effort to notlfy the other owners in the Potato Patch Subdivlslon
as to the date of the next revierr of Mr. Hallrs proposed plan so that you rnay
recelve sufflcient citizen lnput.
The lnpact of thls plan to develop Tract B may have substantlal effects on other
property or,,ners ln the area. The orlglnal protectlve covenants of the Potato Patch
Subdivtslon call for revlew of all proposed lmprovements 1n the subdivlslon by
an archltectural revlew coullttee. It ls our understandl-ng that that review
connlltee's respons ib llities have been assigned to the Town of Vail Deslgn Review
Board.
lmportant in thls case. Again, please make
recelve as much lnpuE as posslble regardlng thls
by telephone as soon as a review hearing date
We will appreciate your tlmely response and imnedlate ention to this matter.
cc. Chrls Severson, Tom Hollls, Jim Morgan, Fritz Glade
Enc 1o sure
Citlzen input, we believe, ls most
every effort to see to lt that you
maEter. Flnally, please notlfy us
has been requested by Mr. Ha1L.
act
Lt^
Georges
p
s
d
,: e
qq. \itrt- ;i\
Fq \FN$
t+go$"
$R\(+ tD
-*'
q+
saqs
FX
--\ V){ $,1a*
t
0c
\b
{1
\tE
DE
2
ts
N-f
sRtDd
o
\iB.,s :f-i:r"r. (oF:
8\
t-.n
f
-.Sca
$
s
S..
\nn
||
-t/tr -
w\y
ul-T
(J
]
S-I
$H
\'l:iF
6+
FP
f
\r1 -
6
f5F
-I
P,or
vt'
,g
\
$l_trI
aJ
F
H
I-rs.
ll \tt
J
5,
$
$
s
\
$
$"
{v:s
x
{'
l-'lI NUTES
REGULAR MEETING
VAIL TOl.lN COUNCILI NOVEMBER, I977
t.
The regular reeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado was convenedat 7:45 P.M. on Tugsday,.November 1,1977, in the Vail Municipal Building Council
Chambers.
Mayor John Dobson and the following
Josef Staufer
Rodney Sliferliilliam Heimbach
Robert Ruder
I'lilliam l'liltoJohn Donovan
Others present included:
counci'lmembers
Stan'ley F. Bernstein, Assistant Town Manager
Lawrence Rider, Town Attorney
ORDINANCE N0. 29, Series of 1977, rezoning a portion of VaiI Run from RC to SDD5 was
introduced on first reading, having been continued from the October 18, 1977 meeting
of the Council. Councilman Heimbach movedoto continue the first reading of the/' ordinance for 30 days, until the December 5, 1977 council meeting. Counci'lman
Donovan seconded the motion, all present voted in favor; and the motion carried.
0RDINANCE N0. 27, Series of 1977, regarding short-term tax anticipation notes, t.las
introduced on second reading. Councilman }lilto moved to approve the ordinance on
second reading; Councilman Ruder seconded the rption; a1l present voted in favor
and the motion carried.
0RDINANCE N0. 28, Series of'1977, arending and subdividing SDD4, Glen Lyon, was in-
troduced on second reading. There was no discussion and Councilman Donovar{rnoved to
approve the ordinance on second reading; Councilman Slifer seconded-the motion; all
present voted in favor and the motion carried.
0RDINANCE N0. 30, Series of 1977, amending Title'18 of the Vai'l Munjcipal Code and re-
zoning certain parcels wjthin the Town of Vail in accordance with Growth Managenent
recommendations, was introduced on first reading by Mayor Dobson. The Mayor then
introduced Town Attorney, Lawrence Rider who explained the legal aspects and the process
of the 0rdinance. Allen Gerstenberger, Director of Cormun'i ty Development for the Town
of Vail, was then introduced. He outlined the agenda for the following presentation
and explained the background which led to the development of the ordinance now under
consideration. He traced the history to the formation of the Town of Vajl Goa'ls
Cormittees and the results of their work, then followed by the staff working to collect
data and infoymation with the help of Briscoe, Maph'is and Lamont; a consulting firm from
Boulder, Colorado; along with assistance from Royston, Hanamoto, Beck & Abey; a con-
sulting firm from I'lil'l Valley, California, for a period of two years. Then' working
with the P'lanning Cormission and the subsequent formation of the Citizens Cormittee on
Growth Management, through bi-weekly meetings for a period of 6 months' reports were
submitted by subconrnittees of the Citizens Conrnittee to the Planning Corrnission' forming
the basis and serving as an impetus for the current plan. He then introduced Dick
Elias, Chairman of the Citizens Conmittee on Growth Management who outlined the detai'ls
of the process and results of the cormittee's work and added that he felt the cormittee
and its sub-corrnittees represented a responsible cross-section of the valley wide interests.
He further stated that the conmittee was not a no-growth cormittee and that he believed
the recormendations made were "middle of the road" recormendations. He cormended the
corunittee and the staff for their work.
Allen Gerstenberger then surmarized the issues of the cormittee's report, stating that
the cormittee was striving for equity for a'l 'l property owners and reminded the persons
present that the process'i s an ongoing one, designed to manage growth as opposed to
Lontrolling growth. Town Attorney Larry Rider points out, for the record, that the full
report has bien reviewed by the counGi1 and that copies have been made available to the
publ i c.
Zoning Administrator, Diana Toughill, then defined the technical aspects of the
definitions contained in the report and gave a brief background of the process taken
to detennine the recormendations which were being made Ed Drager' Chairman of the Vail
Planning Conmission was introduced. He outlined the process of the Planning Cormission
and restated the approval of the Planning Cormission for the Growth Managernnt proiect.
\
. /tes/Regular_Meetinf
,{ovember, I 977
.,age TYto
1
He reinterated that the Planning Conmission had recently passed Reso'lution #l ofthe Vail Planning Cormission which incoorporates the repoit of the Citizen'sCormittee on Growth Management. He pointed out that the vote of the Planning
Conmission on the Resolution was unanimous for the reconrnendations which werebeing presented here tonight. Reso'lution # I was presented to the council asthe official document representing the Planning Colrmissions recormendations.
Mayor Dobson then invited citizen corment. Mr. Bob Byrd, a member of the Citizen's
Connittee pointed out that the;plan was based on factors now known and asks thatthe cormittee monitor the plan and review the situation on a yearly basis or hefears that the plan might fail. He recormended that a revierconmittee be
implemented as soon as possible.
l'lr. Bi'll Luke asked that the Town of Vail not approve the p1an. He stated that he felt
!,hat t-h-e-plnn !!qs. ar_br1tra1y, land cited seveiil general'objections to implementationof the plan based on inequities.
Mr. Lou Parker' a member of the Citizen's Cormittee, reinterates that the sub-corrnitteeon which he served has asked for a lower maximum population figure than the one whichapPears -in the report, and points out that the existing figure was unanimously approvedas a maxjmum recommended figure.
Councilman Heimbach stated that he has been concerned with Section # 2 of the 0rdninance,and asked Diana Toughill to clarify the Primary/Secondary Zoning c'lassification. l'ls.Toughill then explained, using a valley-wide map,-specifically ihat areas were to be zoned.
Councilman Heimbach again states concern over-thb appirent ability to tell any6ne what
can be built on private land, and further states that he wi'll vote against Section # 2of the 0rdinance. Mr. Ron Todd, a rnmber of the Vail Planning Cormission, clarifiesthe intent of Section #2, stating that the zoning is based on per-cent of GRFA. l.lr.
Dudlgy Abbott, a member of the Vail P'lanning Cormission, responds in an attempt toclarify the section in question by stating that one of the goals of the section isto lower the frequency of large mirror-image duplexes. Councilman Heimbach stated thathe did not wish to belabor the point but that he stil'l is opposed to the section.
l'lr. Bill Shephard, a homeowner on Folrest Road, stated that he understands the problemsfacing the Town of Vail, but that he was concerned over loan values, and feels that the
zoning had been arbritrary in that it did not include all areas of duplexes. He statedthat he felt that owners of existing buildings were being unduly penaiized and requeststhat a grandfather clause be incorporated into the ordinance for ex'isting buildings in
an area to be down zoned.
Mayor Dobson expresses concerns also over some elements of the Ordjnance. lrts. Toughill
and l.lr. Todd made a brief explanation in an attempt to clarify the intent of the
ordinance and specifically Section #2. A brief discussion between members of thecouncil and the audience then took place concerning the question of replacement of anybuildings which might be destroyed and effects of the proposed new zoning on rebui'lding.Mr. Luke asked for corments in response to his earlier corments. A brief discussiontook place between council members and Mr. Luke relative to possible changes incharacter in some neighborhoods as a result of the proposals in the ordinance and Mr.
Luke stated that he has great concern over what he perceives to be a different set ofrules for upcorm'ing developments as opposed to those governing previous developments.
Counci'lman Staufer points out that rules do change. Mr. Luke further questions the Town'sright to zone use of land but not population. Councilman Slifer answers by pointing outthat courts and state statutes have upheld density controls. Town Attorney Larry Rider
stated that this ordinance and the process for its implementation are designed tocorrect deficiencies in the original zoning ordinance and that compact neighborhoods
were a goal of the new regulations rather than having patchwork zoning.
At this point in the meeting, l'ls. Toughill began a parcel by parcel explanation of the
proposed changes, beginning with The Racquet Club and continuing to the last parcellisted in the Planning Corrnission memorandum of report which is attached and made a partof these minutes.
Members of the audience speaking on behalf of property owners who were opposed to the
changes being discussed were:
Attorney Dick Hart spoke on behalf of the owners of Parce] 4, (Jackson, Cook & Zablinsky)stating that the owners felt they were not being treated fa'i rly in the progression of
zoning up the va1ley.
(-
t;
' Attorney Jay Peterson spoke for the ownerJ of Parce'l # 6, Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Potato
. rtes'/Regular MeetinSf
November, .|977
,,age Three
Patch and Lot 34, Block l, Vail Potato Patch; stating that the owners had suggested
a compromise. Roger Tilkemeier cormended the owners for volunteering a down zoning
compromise and expressed a hope that Parcel C in Potato Patch cou'ld reamin open space.
He iurther stated that the covenants at this tirne call for Tract C to be recreation
space or open space. Diana Toughill and Larry Rider state that future plans do cal 1
for that parcel to be dedicated to the Town of Vail.
Regarding Parcel # 9, Lots l, 2, 3, Block 3, B'ighorn Subdivision 3rd Addition, Ms.
Toughill-explained the proposedjrezoning. Mqyor Dobson asked for any further conrnents
from the owner, Mr. Bill Luke. Mr. Luke declined any further corment stating that he
does so on the advise of counsel .
Mr. Abe Shapiro spoke on beha'lf of his interest in the proposed zoning of Parcel # l0'
Lot 26, Blotk Z, Vail Village l3th Filing, stating that he has proposed a comprom'ise
and explained the elements of his proposal, reminding the council that the planning
conmission had recomnended approval of the compromise.
D€ue!€pFRRon Lustick sopke on behalf of the owners of Parcel # ll' Lot 7' Block B'
Lionsridge Fi'ling No. l, stating his case for retaining the existing zoning and that
the owneis of the lot feel that if Lot # 8 can retajn the LDMF zoning' then Lot # ll
should be al'lowed to do so also.
Regarding Parcel # 12, Ms. Toughill explained the zoning and the topography of-the Lot
and read-a letter of protest from the owners of Lots 3, 4, 5, 6' 7' Block I ' Bighorn
Subdivision 3rd Addition.
Regarding Parcels # 15 through 21, Ms. Toughill explained that all parce'ls in.this
gr6up weie to be changed from two-family residential to primary/secondary residentia'l
iisti^ict. She read letter of protest irom Fred Lazarus (Lot l, Block I, Vail Village
1st Filing); and a'letter of lgreemtint with proposed zoni19 from_John Tyl.er, the
owner of i;}:A titing lot. - She read a letter of protest from Col. Edward 14. Brown'
Lot 9, Blk 5; Bighori Subdivision 5th addition, requesting additional information and
objeciing to the-down zoning. Joanna Peterson was'present to speak on behalf of the
owiers oi tot.2, Vail Vi'llage 7th Filing (Crawford House) obiecting to the proposed
downzoning and presented a iequest for possible consjderation of variance since
the owneri had iranted to build an additional building next door. Councilman S'lifer
and Mayor Dobson agreed in stating that perhaps design or variances could solve the
the problem.
A brief discussion followed Mr. Shapiro's request for another clarification of the
meaning and purpose of the Primary/Secondary Zoning District. Mr. Lou Parker requests
ttrai ait ot lhe'l'lth filing be pliced undef the primary/secondary district' . Following
some discussion, Councitmen Witlo and Slifer stated that the llth filing probably could
not be added to this proposal by the council. Mr- Parker disagreed.
Mr. tlilliam Sheppard, owner of Lot 4, Block l, Vail Vi'llage 6th Filing ipoke on his own
behalf in oposition of the proposed zoning of his property.
Mayor Dobson questioned how far zoning could be used to accomp'l ish other-goa'l s.,
Councilman Donovan stated that these ire selected parcels to be rezoned in an effort to
preserve develop'ing neighborhoods, Councilman Staufer stated that protection of a
heve'loping neigirUoitrood-can only be done by zoning. Mr._Shapi.ro asked-for a-clarification
of the'us6 of lhe word "densityi'. A briefdiscussion followed. Councilman Staufer
itatea that basically thc aoal-of this plan was to preserve the quality experience and
inat it can only be -preserved through rLstriction of zoning for densities. Lou Parker
questions the ritio 'of primary/secondary district zoning to straight residential zoning.
Ms. Toughill explained thal they were the same.
Town Attorney Larry Rider reconunended to the counci'l that the public hearing portion of
the meeting -Oe cloied and that the ordinance under discussion be taken section by section
and any chinges to be made be done by motion of the counci'l .
Counci'fman Heimbach moved to remove Section #2 lron the ordinance. Mayor Dobson Seconded
the motion; Councilman Heimbach and Mayor Dobson voted in favor and a'l I others present
voted against the motion. The motion failed.
Town Attorni-y Larry Rider explained that some elements of section #2 had been inadvert-
enity ULen oirmittei from the copies of Ordinance #30 and he explained those additions.
Couniilman Iilto moved to approve and include those sections left out. Councilman Staufer
seconded the motion; all pilsent voted in favor and the motion carrjed'
f'
.,utes/regut ar_meeti nS I'November, 1977
page four
- Sections of the ordinance were explained briefly to the council by Lary Rider.'^: Fol'lowing the planning cormission memo, each parcel proposed for down-zoning' u,as then considered and voted upon jndividual'ly: No nrction was necessary for parcel
#1.
Councilman l,li'lto moved that parcel #2 remain LDMF. Councilman Ruder seconded the motion;all present voted in favor and the motion carried.
Councilman Heimbach moved to app_rove the proposed changes in zoning for parcel #3.
Councilman Donovan seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion
carri ed.
Councilman Heimback moved to retain LDMF for parcel # 4; Councilman Staufer secondediall present voted jn favor and the motion carried.
Councilman l.lilto moved to approve the proposed rezoning for parcel #5; Counci'lman
Heimbach seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion carried,
Counci'lman Heimbach moved to approve the compromise proposal that the owner's interest inTract:0 be deeded to the Town di vail. Counci'lmin Ruder seconded the motioni-- '''
Counci'lnan Donovan voted against the motion; all others present voted in favor; and
the motion carried. Parcel # 6 was the parcel voted upon.
t' Councilman Ruder moved to approve the proposed rezoning of parcel #7. Councilman l.lilto
seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion carried.
Councilman l,lilto moved to retain the LDMF zoning for parcel # 8. Councilman Heimbach
seconded the motion ; all present voted in favor and the motion carried.
I
Councilman Ruder moved to rezone parcel #9 as proposed; Counci'lman Donovan seconded the Imotion; al 1 present voted in favor and the motion carried.
Councilman Heimbach moved to accept the compromise proposed for parce'l # .|0. CouncilmanI'lilto seconded the motion; Councilmen Staufer, Slifer, Wilto and Heimbach voted in
favor of the motion; Councilmen Donovan and Ruder voted against the motion; the motion
ca rri ed.
Counci'lman Wilto moved to leave parcel #'l I as LDMF. The motion was seconded by Councilrnn
Heimbach. Councilmen Staufer, Donovan, Heimbach and l.lilto voted in favor of the motion;
Councilman Ruder voted against the motion; The motion carried.
Councilman Ruder moved to rezone parcel # 12 as recommended. Counci'lman Staufer
seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion carried.
Councilman Wilto moved to rezone parcel # 13 as recormended; Counci'lman Ruder seconded-the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion carried.
Counci'lman Ruder moved to accpt the proposed rezoning of parcel #14. Councilman Heimbach
seconded the motion. All present voted in favor and the motion carried.
Counci'lman Slifer moved to accept the proposed zoning for parcels # 15 though 2.|. Council-
man Donovan seconded the motion. Councilman Heimbach voted against the motion. All others
present voted in favor and the motion carried.
Councilman llilto moved to adopt 0rdinance #30, Series of 1977, with the amendments made
by the Counci'| , on first reading. Councilman Oonovan seconded the motion. Al 1 present
voted in favor, except Councilman Heimbach who again expressed his opposition of Section
#2 of the ordinance. The motion carried.
. Resloution #20,Series of 1977 was introduced by Mayor Dobson. Councilman }lilto moved
to approve Resolution #20; Counci'lman Donovan seconded the motion; all present votedin favor and the Resolution was approved ty the Council. Resolution #20 sets forth
the upcoming week as l,later Conservation Week in Vai'l .
. Mayor Dobson then turned the meeting to the presentations and other matters. Pepi' Gramsharmer official ly requested the withdrawal of a parking variance for 9 cars for the
Vail Athletic Club. It was so noted for the record.
Mayor John Dobson then requested a ro1 'l ca1 'l vote for the appointment of two members to
serve_on the Sign Review Cormittee of the Design Review Board. The applicants were:Toni Berns; Fred Distelhorst; and Gail Strauih.
Fred Distelhorst and Toni Berns were elected to serve on the Sign Review Conmittee ofthe Design Review Board.
layor Dobson then read the names of those persons to be appointed c'lerks and judgesfor the upcoming Council election on November 22, 1977. Ail persons were app6inledto the positions. A listing of those persons is attached, and made a part hireto,of these minutes.
Counci'lman Donovan moved to adjourn the rneeting, there being no further business forthe Counci'l to consider. Councilman Ruder seconded the motion; a'll present voted infavor and the meeting was adjourned at ll:15 pm.
,,tuEes/regurar t""rtnf. November, 1977
page five
ATTEST:
MEMOMNDUM
TO:
FROI4:
DATE:
RE:
TO}IN COUNCIL
PLANNI N9 Co|'$'|ISSI oN/DEPARTI'IENT 0F CoMMUNITY DEVELoPMENT
NovEl-tBER 1, 1977
RECOMMENDATIONS OIi PROPOSED ZONING AMEI{DMENTS AND DOl.lN ZONING.
e II (7.971 acres, approximately 6 acres bu i 'l dab'l e )
RCRezoning: LDI'IF with 60 units maximum to
units cument zoning - 60 units
units amended LDMF - 54 units
units proposed rezoning - 38 units
Tne fol'lowing is a sumnary of the Planning Cormission meeting of September
'19'- 1977 and recormendations of the Cormission to the Council.
Reso'lution No. I of the Vail Planning Cormission was approved which adopted
Phase I of the Comprehensive Plan and by reference the maps and all documents
to which the maps refer, as well as recognizing the Report and Recorunendations
of the Growth Management subcormittee.
The Planning Cormission then unanimously approved the Zoning Amendments
out'lined in the attached memorandum.
Each parcel proposed for down-zoning was then considered individually:
l. Racquet Club (13 acres)
PFo[63Eii-EEoning: Reduction of units.
l4aximum units current zoning - 390 units, county approval 360 units
Maxjmum units proposed - 247 units
Planning Cormission recorunendation - Maintain MDMF with 247 units
tota'l maximum.
lla'lter Kirch proposed to the Planning Corrnission that they consider his
remaining undeve'loped''l and and a proportional share of the land used for
recreationa'l amenities at the proposed MDMF maximum of l8 units per acre
or a maximun of 247 units. This represents a 30% down-zoning for the balance_
of the proposed project. All members were in favor with the exception of Mills.
2. Vai'l lnvestment Properties (0.4 acres)@nc
I'laximum units current zoning - 76 units
!'laximum units amended LDl.lF - 57 units
Maximum units proposed rezoning - 38 units
Planning Cormissio.n recormendation - Rezone to RC
Craig Folson was present to object to reduction in density (letter attached).
The Planning Cormission voted 5 for and Ron Todd opposed to the rezoning-
II
II
Allen Gerstenberger then surmarized the issues of the cormitteers report, stating thatthe connittee was tlfiying for equity ior ali-piop"iiv-i*n.rs and reminded the personspresent that the p.o.g:.._is-an ongoiirg one, deiig;;d-io-rinug" growth as opposed tocontrolling growth. Town Attorne! Lairv niaei-p6init-or[l"io" the record, that the fuilreport has been reviewed by the c6unGil'and thai-.opi"i-r,in" been made available to thepubl i c.
Zoning Administrator, Diana Toughill, then defined the technica.l aspects of thedefinitions contained in the ""io"i ini gave.a.brief.background of the process takento determine the recomnendations which-were-being made-.""i0 Orug"r, Chairman of the VailPlanning cormission was introduced. He'ouilinea"ilre-i"oc"ii of the planning cormissionand restated the approva'l of the Planning conrnission io"-ilr" Growth Managerent project.
Gore Ran
Proposed
Maximum
l'laximum
Maximum
lage 2
Recormendations on
Amendments and Down
proposed Zon'ing
Zoni ng.
Planning Cormission reconmendation - Rezone to RC
Bob l,larner, representing the owners, notified me to infonn the Planning
Conmission that he has withdrawn his employee housing proposal and that theycould proceed rith the down-zoning to RC. Planning Cormission voted unanimouslyto rezone the parcel
4. !qc!son, Cook, Zqblnsky (3.0 acres)@tonc
l'laximum units current zoning - 36 units
l4aximum units amended LDMF - 27 units
Maximum units proposed rezoning - l8 un'its
Planning Cormission recormendation - Rezone to RC
Cass Zabinsky was present to protest the proposed rezoninq. After a lengthy
discussion, al'l of the P'l anning Corrniss'i on, except Ed Drager voted to reduce' the densityto RC. Mn Zabinsky Iater requested that the Plann'ing Cormission reconsider theirvote in light of their decisjon on the Weisen parcel; the motion was defeated
unanimously.
5. Lots 2 and 3, Block 8, Bighorn Subdivision 3rd Addition (.255 and .419 acres)
Maximum units current zoning - 8 units
I'laximum units amended LDMF - 6 units
Maximum units proposed rezoning - 4 units
Planning Cormission recormendatin - Retain LDMF
Erika McCall was present representing Vail East Lodging. She pointed outthat Vail East had a'lready voluntarily down-zoned two of their parcels toagricu'ltural and wou'ld like to retain the possibility of developing five or sixunits on the subject property. The Planning Conmission voted to retain the LDMF
zoning with Sandy Mills opposing the motion.
1)
6. Lot 6, Block 2, Vail/Potato Patch
Lot 34, Block I, Vail/Potato Patch
lilaximum units current zoning - Lot
l'laximum units amended IIDMF - Lot 6
Iilaximum units proposed rezoning -
Haximum units proposed compromise-
PI anning Commi ssion recormendati on
(3.91 acres)(.997 acres)
6 - Il7, Lot 34 - 29- 70, Lot 34 - 17LotS-23, 1ot34-5
t8t 8.--'RBfiFp Uf,]t: il3liilUfr'
- accept compromise
Allen Gerstenberger then sunmarized the issues of the cormittee,s report, stating thatthe cormittee was striving for equity for all property owners and reininded the personspresent_that the process is an ongoing one, designed to manage growth as opposeil tocontrolling growth. Town Attorney Larry Rider points out, f6r lhe record,'ttrat tne fu]lreport has been reviewed by the counGil and that copies have been made avii'lab'le to thepubl ic.
1o!!ng Administrator,- Diana Toughill, then defined the technical aspects of thedefinitions contained in the report and gave a brief background of ttre process takento determine the recomnendations which were being made -Ed Drager, Chairman of the VailPlanning Connission was introduced. He outlined the process of itre-planning Cormissionand restated the approval of the P'lanning Cormission ?or the Growth Managem6nt project.
./age 3. Recormendations Qn
Amendments and Down
proposed
Zoni ng.
zonr n9
C
Jay Peterson was present representing the-owner' John Hall. He requested
the Pla-nning Cormissiolr to retaih the MDMF Zoning which permits .35 GRFA as
opposeA to [C at .25 GRFA and limit the unit naximum to 30 units on Lot 6 and 8
,iits on Lot 34 to allow large luxury units. Peterson further proposed that Hall
*iirio ue iitting to iuii-iiaim to itrl iown of Vail his right to develop.recreational
amenities and a tramriiy on Tract C (adjacent to Sandstone-Tot Lot)._-White' Abbott'
il;;.; inO ioOJ voted in favor. of tlie iompromise with Hanlon and ltlills voting
agai nst.
7. Be]inda Ward Weisen (1.5 acres)
Fropo;edTezdlng: LDMF to RC
Maximun units current zoning - 18 units
Maximum units amended LDMF - 13 units
l4aximum units proposed rezoning - 9 units
Planning Corrnission reconmendation - Retain LDMF
Ms. l,leisen was representeO by Jay Peterson who requested the property-remain
at t-Ot'lF since it is lolated betweLn t-he Racquet Club and Timberfa'lls. I'lills made
a motion for rezoning to RC which was seconded by Hanlon; Todd, Drager, and Abbott
voted againsti motion for rezoning failed.
8. Lot 7, Block A, t-ronsridge Filing N (1.234 acres)
l'laximum units current zoning - 14 units
Maximum units amended LDMF - 1'l units
Maximum units proposed rezoning - 7 units
Planning Comniision recormendation - Retain LDMF
Gary Flanders, rePresenting the new owners' was present to protest- lle proposed
reductio-n in densiiy aha to reqiest the property remain LDMF because of its location
direct'ly adJacent t-o iolnestafe. Planninb Cbrmilsion voted unanimously to retain the
LDMF zoning.
9. Lots l,2,3, Block 3, Bighorl gubdivision 3rd Addition (Lot I - .800 acres,
Lot Z - .937 acres, Lot 3 - .732 acres)
Proposed Rezoning: LDMF to RC
Maximum units current zoning - Lot
Maximum units amended LDI'IF - Lot
Maximum units proposed rezoning -
Planning Cormission recormendation
I -9units,Lot2-l'll-7units,Lot2- 8Lotl -4units,Lot2-- Rezone to RC
units,Lot3-8units,Lot3-6
5 units, Lot 3 -
unlts
units4 unil
,3 Lot 'l is owned by Jakob who has submitted no written protest. . Mr. Bil'l Luke
who owns Lots 2 and jcalled in a protest at 6:00 P.M. the day of the meeting- Our
staff has since met with his attorney. Planning Corunission voted unanimously to
down-zone all the lots to RC.
Allen Gerstenberger then sunmarized the issues of the cormittee,s report, stating thatthe cormittee was s!1ivin9 for equity for ali piope"iv-o*n""r ana reininded the personspresent-that the process is an ongoing one, aeitghea io-rinage growth as-oppoieo tocontrolling growth.. Town.Attorney t-airy Riaer poinis ort,"16" irre ""cJ"a,'[tit 1,. rrttreport has been reviewed by the cbunti'l-and thai copiei-trive been made availab1e to thepubl ic.
4o!!ng Administrator, Diana Toughill, then defined the technical aspects of thedefinitions contained in the refort ind gave a uriei uaiig"ouna oi-[rr.-p"o..is-t.r"nto determine the recorrnendationi which wire being madi-. "ro orager, cnilrmin of the vailPlanning Conmission was introduced. He outlined-tne-proceii or-[rre'pii.riins'cJ-issionand restated the approval of the Planning corrnission i'o" irr" Growth Manigeilni-pro;ect.
'laq; 5' Reiormendations
Anendments and
on proposed Zoning
Down Zoning
2o.ffi""'3l'.li1l;il!:[};b:li,3;?..il!i!:i,.Lotsl0-l2'
Lots l-7, vtirlpiitii"pli"-n'i"iidA i;iift;;-fu;;uaivision or Lots I and 2'
. Vail/Potato Patch.
Property orn""i-iia not obJect to proposed rezoning'
21 - tit!#*l b3li, l|.' ft ,:l gl:il":":'il5il1;:i:l:eIlit' il, gr o.r-q,. qiehe"n
subdivision sri-ioaition. Lots li,";iiii-'ii-r-tt:.]-19'Block 5; Lots l-4'
Block 6; Lots l-20, Block 7; eignorn iubaiviiion 5th Atldition'
No protests rr.""-"i."i'ia tiom o*nli:t-in-siirya-:::gnd Addition' rhe
BonrickSubdivisionwasapproveawittrcovenintssimilartotheproposed
new Zone. One written pr9tg:q.t'ut'""t"iu"a t"o* Colonel Browne who owns
Lot 9, Block 5, in the 5th Atltlttton'
Planning Commission voted unanimoygly
"nur""ii"a ii tt.tt l5-21 from Two-Family
Residential.
to approve the rezoning of each lot
neiiolhtiar to Primarv/Secondary
(Total density reduction as outlined
ii-eionirt-mi"nagement subconmittee report -
Total density reduction as recorrnended
by the Planning Commission -
Thereisno..scientific..wayofcalculatingthe.popul.ationreductionforthe
primary/Secondary rezoning,.but we u".-ii"iii.ni it'ut'ii will have a positive effect
;;;'d; imalllr site oi'tt'e second allowable unit'
Allen Gerstenberger then sumarized the issues of the cormittee's report, stating thatthe cormittee v{as striving for equity for all property owners ana reminOed the personspresent_that the process is an ongoing one, deiighed 1o manage growth as opposei tocontrol]ing growth. Town Attorney tairy Rider p6ints out, 16r lne recora,'itrai ttre tuttreport has been reviewed by the countil-and thal copies hive been nade aviilab'le to thepubl i c.
4oqlng Administrator, Diana Toughill, then defined the technical aspects of thedefinitions contained in the report and gave a brief background or lrri proceii-tatento determine the recormendations which wire being made -Ed Drager, chiirman of the vailPlanning Cormission was introduced. He outlined the process of irre'piinnin!'connisstonand restated the approva'l of the P'lanning Corrnission for the Growth Managen6nt project.
447 units
440 units
(
wRoseRr H. VtlsoN
221 NoF-TH L,r S,\LLE STREET
Cr-lrcAco, ILLINoTS 6060l
3t 2 -236 - 82 a5
December 18, 1979
l,tr. Craig Snowden
Chairman, Desigm Review Board
c,/o Snowden & Hopkins, Architects
201- Gore Creek DriveVaiI, Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Snowden:
Re: lr:|- 34, Tract B, Block 1Iot 6, Btock 2
vai1./Potato Patch Srrbdivision
I understancl that a plan has been submittedl to your Board for the
development of the above captioned lots. From the information I
received, it appe ars that a request for a chanqe in the purpose useof some of the land, particularly in Tract B, may be in the offing.
If a change of use is requested, I hope that a hearing wj.11 be held
to aLlow aJ-J- property olrners rn the subdivision to e:<pres s their
opinions and recormendations.
I worked closely with the VaiI Associates representatives and vtas
assurecl both with documentation and verbally that the restrictions
would be enforced and that we could rely on the type of development
that the City of Vail and Vail Associates wish to see mature in Potato
Patch.
I pur?osellr sold my condorniniurn in Licns Head tc get avial' fro:n +-he
concrete jungle that rtas allowed to develop there. The trade for the
inconvenience and nnre difficult management responsibilities was the
acquisition of greater privacy and guietness. It is rny understanding
that the uppe r tier lots in Potato Patch were to be single family with
duplexes allowed although many of the buyers prefer not to build
duplexes.
I feel strongly whether I live all year around in Vail or live part
time -- f pay the same real estate taxes as people who live aI1 year
around. I must pay for the same services to maintain ny property,
driveways, etc., as if I lived there full time.
'l- .
ur. Craig Snowden
Page T\oo
Decenber I8r 1979
As a pltoperty olener I e:qtect I wl-ll be tluly notifieal of any neetings
and that there will be a public hearing on any proposedl change of
exlsting zonipg regulations, city pollcies ar1f./ot covenalttg of recorrtl.
Sinoerely,
&,bert H. Wileon
cc: l{r. Chris SLvertson!tr. Tom Hollisl{r. Fritz Glade
Iitr. Bd Dragerllr. Jir RrbiJr
l{r. Chud< Donally
? !lr. Peter Patten
a
il$ain lNigh Proparliss, [$d
Robsrl Serofin
T3l0lslsnd Circle
Boulder, C0 80301
303/530.0892
cc: Larry Mullin
Cralg Snonllen
Chrls Sivertson
lorry Mullin
P.0. t604
Voil, C0 81657
3031476.3094
7 December 1979
Mr. Luc Meyer
813 Potato Patch RoadVail, Colorado 81657
Re: Lot 34, Tract B, Block 1Lot 6, Block 2
VaiUPotato Parch Subdivision
Dear Luc,
Thanks very much for your letter of November 9 apprising us ofthe status of proposed development of the above referenced property.
Larry Mullin and I, as general partners of Mountain lligh Properties
whlch owns Lot 2I, Block 2, were shocked to heat of' the proposal for '
devel-opment of portions of Tract B for the exclusive use of a selegt
subset of the property otners in the Potato Patch. Moreover, lt lras
disrnaylng to l-earn that this proposal, nade without lnfo rrnlng Potato
Patch owners, would be considered by the Design and Review Board.
It is our belief and desire that Tract B shoul-d remain as
undeveloped green belL in perpetuity for the enjoyment and use of all
Potato Patch.property owners. If the developers of l,ots 34 and 6
wish. to have private. tennis courts, picnic areas, or extra parklngit seems - that .these arentttes should be placed on Lots 34 and 6 andnot on greenbelt land which hg.s been Lntended for. the general use ofall residents in the subdivislon.
I agree with you that defacing of Tract, B as proposeC woulC ha',, e'a detrlmental affect on the general quiet atmosphere now enj oyed by
Potato ?atch residents and would adversely affect property values Lnthe area. We dontt need a tennis court, paddle ball court, swimingpoo1, pavilLons, etc., on every square foot of open space in Vai1.Letrs leave some to Mother Nature.
If I can help you further in matters related to this issue Iwill be happy to do so. Again, thanks very much for acting in ourint,erests and those of other owners in the Potato Patch.
Ton llollisFritz Glade
Ed Drager Peter Patten
f. *r
c.TRAVIS TRAYLOR. JR.
CHAINMAN OF THE BOARD
FIRST MORTGAGB COMPAI{Y
OF TEXAS, INC.
525-7000
p. o. Box lzlt3. HOUSTON, TEXAS 77001
November 26, 1979
OIRECT LINE
52s-t160
.l
II
Mr. Cralg Snowden
Chairman, Design Review Board
c/o Snowden & IloPkins, Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive
VaLl, Colorado 81557
Re: Lot 34, Tract B, Block I
Lot 6, Block 2 )Vail-/iotato Patch Subdivision
Dear Craig:
I understand that a plan has been submitted to your Board for
tn" a..r"fopment of the above captioned lots' From the infonna-
tion I reclived, l-t apPears that a request for a change l-n the
purpose use of some of the land, Particularly in Tract B' may
be in the offing.
If a change of use is requested I hope that a hearing wll-l be
held to ailow all Property owners in the subdivlslon to exPress
their opinions and recotrmendatlons '
Prior to my purchasing Lot 27, Block I in the Potato Patch
Subdivl,slon, I personally na<le at least 5 trips to Vail' Durlng
those triPs I inspected every vacant 1ot for sale in the entire
town of Vall. I consulted rtlth a numbet of real estate agentst
builders, architects and knowledgable businessmen in the corn-
munity to ascertain whether Potato Patch was in fact a First
Rate beveLopment and lf the restrictions were such that the
property values would be protected'
One of my prl-me requisltes was to find an area wlth low density
restrictlons. The development of vail with high ilenslty construc-
tion rtaa of alarur to me and I was concerned that the Village of
VaLl may be ultinately conpleted as a "concrete jungle"' I hope
this wil1 oot haPPen.
I am in the mortgage banking business and fully aPpreclate all
of the factors that affect Property values' I an also in the
?
j
I
I
Mr. Craig Snowden
November 26, 1979
Page Two
Resldential Lot Development busl-ness in Ilouston' My company
has completed the development of ovei 25,000 residentlal lots
in the Houston MetroPolltan Area.
You may recall that Houston is the only major city in the
United States rtithout zoning. Our property is proteeted by
individual subdivislon restrictlon, which when approved by
the city become the governing ordlnance ' It is therefore'
.*trer.ly imPortant that Property owDers can reLy on restrlc-
tions approved prior to the subdivision plat recordlng'
I reallze that reasonable requests for changes are necessary'
I also recognlze that revl-ew boards are usually made up of un-
paid volunteers who give thelr time unselfishly only to be
crltlcLzed bY nearlY everyone.
The purpose of ny letter ls to request the Revl-ew Board to take
lnto consideratl-oD the views of the property owners and to give
the owners a chance to review the request for any proposed
changes or deviation from the existing restrictions. If open
land is used (as a change in the restrictions) the followlng
questlons corne to mind:
1. Will the l-nprovements be available to al-l
subdivision owners?
2. What wiLl the cost be?
3. Wil-l it be an lncrease to the proPerty owners
tax base?
4 . !1111 all ol^tners be taxed or on1-y those who elect
to use the facilitLes?
5. Wil-1 the proposed facilitles be an attractive
nuisance?
6. Will the factllties attract outside users (Poachers)
reducing the owners quiet enjoyrnent of thelr property?
7. Who will monitor the use, upkeep and management of
the facilities?
These are Just some of the questlons that come to mind ' Many
oftheproPertyownersofexl-stinghousesllveoutsldeVailand
"oV "aat".aion rchich may unreasonable. increase use of restricted
pt6p".ty could result in security problems'
i- - -" - -tI
I
!
?
Mr. Cralg Snowden
November 26' 1979
Page Three
I hope to be a Property olrner ln the Potato Patch for many
years and I would hate to see any type of change that may
'"dversely affect Property values of livlng condltlons rtithin
the area. I am at pi"s"ttt attemPtl-ng to purchase addltional
piop"tay in the subdlvislon for the coostructl'on of another
residence.
I certalnly rtant to be constructlve ln my views and ln no ltay
want to reltrict the rights of others so long as thelr requests
.r.-e"rr, reasonable and in keeplng \t-ith the overall develop-
ment acheme orlglnal-lY Planned '
lf Vail is going to be an attractive' on-goJ-ng tol'n based,on a
,rorraert.rf glr-ots, fine recreatlonal facllities and a relaxed
ffi. rayf., tt wiil- have to conttnually resist the temptatlon
to nake- "one more changett for the sake of growth '
Sincerelyl \ \N/*7r0"-/A) ',Y,:wK
crT/lhh
cc: Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Ur.ltr.
Mr.
Traylor, Jr.
Chris Sivertson
Ton llollls
Fritz Glade
Ed Drager
Jlu Rubln
Chuck DonallY
Peter Patten y'
I
-.|