The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPEC090021Planning and Environmental Commisson਍ഀ ACTION FORM਍ഀ TOM W VE਍ഀ C%xw "rf Ce%VLC"xW਍ഀ Department of Community Development਍ഀ 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 51657਍ഀ tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452਍ഀ web: www.valigov.com਍ഀ Project Name: Variance PEC Number: PEC090021਍ഀ Project Description:਍ഀ SETBACK VARIANCE FOR NEW TWO-FAMILY DWELLING਍ഀ Participants:਍ഀ OWNER TOWN OF VAIL 06/18/2009਍ഀ 75 S FRONTAGE RD਍ഀ VAIL਍ഀ CO 81657਍ഀ APPLICANT VAG, INC. ARCHITECTS & PLANN 06/18/2009 Phone: 970-949-7034਍ഀ PO BOX 1734਍ഀ VAIL਍ഀ CO 81658-1734਍ഀ License: 0000002386਍ഀ ARCHITECT VAG, INC. ARCHITECTS & PLANN 06/18/2009 Phone: 970-949-7034਍ഀ PO BOX 1734਍ഀ VAIL਍ഀ CO 81658-1734਍ഀ License: 0000002386਍ഀ Project Address: 2657 AROSA DR VAIL Location:਍ഀ Legal Description: Lot: 8 Block: C Subdivision: VAIL RIDGE਍ഀ Parcel Number: 2103-142-0402-5਍ഀ Comments: See conditions below਍ഀ Motion By: Kurz਍ഀ Second By: Lindall਍ഀ Vote: 4-0-1 (Viele recused)਍ഀ Conditions:਍ഀ BOARD/STAFF ACTION਍ഀ Action: APPROVED਍ഀ Date of Approval: 07/13/2009਍ഀ Cond: 8਍ഀ (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of਍ഀ Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).਍ഀ Cond:300਍ഀ (PLAN): PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of਍ഀ approval.਍ഀ Cond: CON0010851਍ഀ Design Review:਍ഀ 1. This approval shall be contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town of Vail਍ഀ approval of a design review application.਍ഀ Building Permit:਍ഀ 2. The applicant must obtain final review and approval of a site specific hazard਍ഀ study (As described in Section 12-21-13, Restrictions in Geologically Sensitive਍ഀ Areas, Vail Town Code), by the Town of Vail Community Development Department, prior਍ഀ to the issuance of a building permit.਍ഀ Certificate of Occupancy:਍ഀ 3. The applicant shall record a plat of the property, including an approved drainage਍ഀ easement, prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy, or਍ഀ Certificate of Occupancy.਍ഀ Planner: Nicole Peterson PEC Fee Paid: $0.00਍ഀ TOWNOF YAII.' .਍ഀ MEMBERS PRESENT਍ഀ Michael Kurz਍ഀ Susie Tjossem਍ഀ Rollie Kjesbo਍ഀ Scott Lindall਍ഀ David Viele਍ഀ Site Visits:਍ഀ 1. Arosa Duplex, 2657 Arosa Drive਍ഀ MEMBERS ABSENT਍ഀ Bill Pierce਍ഀ Sarah Paladino਍ഀ 30 minutes਍ഀ A request for a final review of a variance from 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to਍ഀ Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a new two-family਍ഀ dwelling, located at 2657 Arosa Drive/Lot 8, Block C, Vail Ridge, and setting forth details in਍ഀ regard thereto. (PEC090021)਍ഀ Applicant: Vail Housing Authority, represented by VAg, Inc. Architects & Planners਍ഀ Planner: Nicole Peterson਍ഀ ACTION: Approved with condition(s)਍ഀ MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Lindall VOTE: 4-0-1 (Viele recused)਍ഀ CONDITIONS:਍ഀ 1. This approval shall be contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town of Vail approval਍ഀ of a design review application.਍ഀ 2. The applicant must obtain final review and approval of a site specific hazard study (As਍ഀ described in Section 12-21-13, Restrictions in Geologically Sensitive Areas, Vail Town਍ഀ Code), by the Town of Vail Community Development Department, prior to the issuance of਍ഀ a building permit.਍ഀ 3. The applicant shall record a plat of the property, including an approved drainage਍ഀ easement, prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy, or Certificate of਍ഀ Occupancy.਍ഀ Nicole Peterson gave a presentation per the staff memorandum.਍ഀ David Viele arrived and recused due to the fact that he is involved with the proposed਍ഀ construction.਍ഀ Stephanie Lord-Johnson, architect with VAg, representing the applicant, stated that she was਍ഀ available to answer questions, but felt the memorandum covered the facts.਍ഀ Bob Armour, adjacent property owner, suggested that it may be appropriate to request the਍ഀ applicant to remove the man-made earthen dam located on the western end of the property.਍ഀ George Ruther, representing the Town as an applicant stated that he would speak with Public਍ഀ Works about removing the dam, which should be removed regardless of the proposed਍ഀ construction on site.਍ഀ PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION਍ഀ July 13, 2009਍ഀ 1:00pm਍ഀ TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME਍ഀ 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657਍ഀ Page 1਍ഀ The Commissioners expressed their support for the variance application. Commissioner Kjesbo਍ഀ stated that due to the fact that other setback variances have been approved in the neighborhood਍ഀ and the site constraints, listed in the Staff memorandum, he had no trouble with the variance਍ഀ request.਍ഀ Kurz moved to approve the variance request, with conditions and findings stated on pages 7 & 8਍ഀ of Staff's July 13, 2009 memorandum to the PEC (Lindall second). Motion passed 4-0.਍ഀ 5 minutes਍ഀ 2. A request for a work session to discuss the adoption of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan,਍ഀ an element of the Vail Transportation Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto.਍ഀ (PEC090014)਍ഀ Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Tom Kassmel਍ഀ Planner: Bill Gibson਍ഀ ACTION: Table to July 27, 2009਍ഀ MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Lindall VOTE: 4-0-0਍ഀ 5 minutes਍ഀ 3. A request for a work session to discuss a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3,਍ഀ Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of public buildings and grounds਍ഀ (fire station), located at 2399 North Frontage Road/Parcel A, Resub of Tract D, Vail Das Schone਍ഀ Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090019)਍ഀ Applicant: Town of Vail਍ഀ Planner: Bill Gibson਍ഀ ACTION: Table to July 27, 2009਍ഀ MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Lindall VOTE: 4-0-0਍ഀ 5 minutes਍ഀ 4. A request for a work session to discuss prescribed regulations amendments, pursuant to Section਍ഀ 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, and਍ഀ setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090017)਍ഀ Applicant: Town of Vail਍ഀ Planner: Rachel Friede਍ഀ ACTION: Table to July 27, 2009਍ഀ MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Lindall VOTE: 4-0-0਍ഀ 5. Approval of June 22, 2009 minutes਍ഀ MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Tjossem VOTE: 4-0-0਍ഀ 6. Information Update਍ഀ The PEC was informed that the Vail Row House had resubmitted an application for the਍ഀ establishment of a SDD.਍ഀ 7. Adjournment਍ഀ MOTION: Tjossem SECOND: Lindall VOTE: 4-0-0਍ഀ The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during਍ഀ regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage਍ഀ Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public਍ഀ hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for਍ഀ additional information.਍ഀ Page 2਍ഀ MEMORANDUM਍ഀ TO: Planning and Environmental Commission਍ഀ FROM: Community Development Department਍ഀ DATE: July 13, 2009਍ഀ SUBJECT: A request for final review of a variance from 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code,਍ഀ pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction਍ഀ of a new two-family dwelling, located at 2657 Arosa Drive/Lot 8, Block C, Vail Ridge,਍ഀ and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090021)਍ഀ Applicant: Vail Local Housing Authority, represented by VAg Inc.਍ഀ Planner: Nicole Peterson਍ഀ 1. SUMMARY਍ഀ The applicant, Vail Local Housing Authority, represented by VAg Inc., is requesting a rear਍ഀ setback variance, from the required 15 feet to 10 feet, to allow new construction of a two-਍ഀ family dwelling, located at 2657 Arosa Drive.਍ഀ Based upon Staffs review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the਍ഀ evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends਍ഀ the Planning and Environmental Commission approves, with conditions, the variance਍ഀ request.਍ഀ II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST਍ഀ The applicant is requesting a rear setback variance to allow for the construction of a new਍ഀ two-family dwelling (two employee housing units). The foundation of the proposed structure਍ഀ will encroach from 3 feet (east unit) to 3'h feet (west unit), leaving 11 Y2 to 12 foot setbacks਍ഀ from the south property line. The total GRFA (Gross Residential Floor Area) of the਍ഀ encroachment equals 175 square feet. The chimney will encroach 5 feet (west unit), and the਍ഀ eaves of both units encroach 5 feet, leaving a 10 foot setback from the south property line.਍ഀ According to Section 14-10-4, Architectural Projections, Vail Town Code, chimney's and਍ഀ eaves may projection four feet into the setback, therefore the chimney and eaves are਍ഀ technically encroaching 1 foot into the setback.਍ഀ III. BACKGROUND਍ഀ The original plat for this property was recorded in 1965 under Eagle County jurisdiction. The਍ഀ original structure, known as the "A-frame House," was constructed in 1977 and demolished਍ഀ in 1999 in anticipation of new construction of employee housing units. When the property਍ഀ was annexed into the Town of Vail under Ordinance No. 6, 1986 it was zoned Two-Family਍ഀ Primary/ Secondary Residential (PS) District with a minimum rear setback of 15 feet- The਍ഀ original structure encroached into the rear (south side) setback approximately 5 feet.਍ഀ In 1999 the Town pursued the construction of a two-family dwelling (two employee housing਍ഀ units). The application was withdrawn in 2000. Several studies were conducted during਍ഀ 1999 including:਍ഀ • Site development analysis, The Stevens Group, Inc. January 27, 1999਍ഀ • Offsite Drainage Study, Peak Land Consultants, Inc. May 17, 1999਍ഀ • Site development analysis and architecture, American Design Group, June 14, 1999਍ഀ • Preliminary geologic hazards analysis, Collins & Lampiris April 2, 1999਍ഀ • Wetland Delineation Report, Montane Environmental Solutions, Ltd. November 5,਍ഀ 1999਍ഀ The analyses from 1999 provided useful background and research for the current proposal.਍ഀ However, most of the research and analyses, being a decade old, has been revisited and re-਍ഀ evaluated by the design team selected by the Town, with regard to the current conditions਍ഀ and proposed structure.਍ഀ IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS਍ഀ Vail Town Code਍ഀ Section 12-2 Definitions਍ഀ SETBACK. The distance from a lot or site line, creek or stream measured horizontally to a਍ഀ line or location within the lot or site which establishes the permitted location of uses,਍ഀ structures, or buildings on the site.਍ഀ SETBACK LINE. A line or location within a lot or site which establishes the permitted਍ഀ location of uses, structures, or buildings on the site.਍ഀ SETBACK LINE, REAR: The setback line extending the full width of the site parallel to and਍ഀ measured from the rear lot or site line.਍ഀ Section 12-6D Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS) District਍ഀ 12-6D-1: PURPOSE.਍ഀ The two-family primary/secondary residential district is intended to provide sites for single-਍ഀ family residential uses or two-family residential uses in which one unit is a larger primary਍ഀ residence and the second unit is a smaller caretaker apartment, together with such public਍ഀ facilities as may appropriately be located in the same district. The two-family਍ഀ primary/secondary residential district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, privacy and਍ഀ open space for each dwelling, commensurate with single-family and two-family occupancy,਍ഀ and to maintain the desirable residential qualities of such sites by establishing appropriate਍ഀ site development standards.਍ഀ 12-6D-6: SETBACKS:਍ഀ In the primary/secondary residential district, the minimum front setback shall be twenty feet਍ഀ (20'), the minimum side setback shall be fifteen feet (15'), and the minimum rear setback਍ഀ shall be fifteen feet (15').਍ഀ Section 12-17 Variances਍ഀ 2਍ഀ 12-17-1: PURPOSE:਍ഀ A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to lessen such practical਍ഀ difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this਍ഀ title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from਍ഀ certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical਍ഀ hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of਍ഀ existing structures thereon; from topographic orphysical conditions on the site orin਍ഀ the immediate vicinity, or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions਍ഀ in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the Applicant of strict or literal਍ഀ compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance.਍ഀ V.਍ഀ B. Development Standards Excepted: Variances may be granted only with respect to the਍ഀ development standards prescribed for each district, including lot area and site਍ഀ dimensions, setbacks, distances between buildings, height, density control, building਍ഀ bulk control, site coverage, usable open space, landscaping and site development,਍ഀ and parking and loading requirements, or with respect to the provisions of chapter 11਍ഀ of this title, governing physical development on a site.਍ഀ C. Use Regulations Not Affected: The power to grant variances does not extend to the਍ഀ use regulations prescribed for each district because the flexibility necessary to avoid਍ഀ results inconsistent with the objectives of this title is provided by chapter 16,਍ഀ "Conditional Use Permits"; and by section 12-3-7, 'Amendment" of this title.਍ഀ SITE ANALYSIS਍ഀ Address: 2657 Arosa Drive਍ഀ Legal Description: Lot 8, Block C, Vail Ridge਍ഀ Zoning: Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential District਍ഀ Land Use Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential਍ഀ Current Land Use: Vacant lot਍ഀ Lot Size: 0.417 ac / 18,164.52 square feet਍ഀ Environmental Hazards: Moderate Debris Flow਍ഀ Development Standard Required Existing Proposed਍ഀ Min. Lot Area: 15,000 sq. ft. 18,164.52 sq. ft. No change਍ഀ Min. Setbacks:਍ഀ Front:਍ഀ 20' (north)਍ഀ vacant਍ഀ 31'਍ഀ Sides:਍ഀ 15' (east)਍ഀ vacant਍ഀ 39'਍ഀ 15' (west)਍ഀ vacant਍ഀ 144'਍ഀ Rear:਍ഀ 15' (south)਍ഀ vacant਍ഀ 10'਍ഀ Max. Building Height:਍ഀ 33' slope਍ഀ vacant਍ഀ 26'਍ഀ Max. GRFA:਍ഀ Primary EHU਍ഀ 4,146 sq. ft.਍ഀ vacant਍ഀ 1,118 sq. ft.਍ഀ 3਍ഀ VI.਍ഀ VII਍ഀ Development Standard਍ഀ Secondary EHU਍ഀ Total਍ഀ Max. Site Coverage:਍ഀ Min. Landscape Area:਍ഀ Min. Parking:਍ഀ Required Existing਍ഀ 2,764 sq. ft. vacant਍ഀ 6,911 sq. ft. vacant਍ഀ 3,633 sq. ft. (20%) vacant਍ഀ 10,899 sq. ft. (60%) vacant਍ഀ 4 spaces vacant਍ഀ SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING਍ഀ Current Land Use਍ഀ North: Residential਍ഀ South: USDA White River਍ഀ National Forest਍ഀ East: Arosa Drive &਍ഀ 1-70਍ഀ West: Residential਍ഀ CRITERIA AND FINDINGS਍ഀ Zoning਍ഀ Two-Family Primary/Secondary਍ഀ Not Designated਍ഀ Not Designated਍ഀ Two-Family Primary/Secondary਍ഀ Proposed਍ഀ 1,118 sq. ft.਍ഀ 3,235 sq. ft.਍ഀ 2,421 sq. ft. (13%)਍ഀ 13,014 sq. ft. (71਍ഀ 4 spaces਍ഀ Land Use Designation਍ഀ Low Density Residential਍ഀ Hillside Residential਍ഀ Not Designated਍ഀ Low Density Residential਍ഀ 12-17-6: CRITERIA AND FINDINGS:਍ഀ A. Factors Enumerated: Before acting on a variance application, the planning and਍ഀ environmental commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the਍ഀ requested variance:਍ഀ 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses਍ഀ and structures in the vicinity.਍ഀ The requested variance, to vary the rear, south side setback from the required 15਍ഀ feet to 10 feet will not adversely affect uses and structures in the vicinity for the਍ഀ following reasons.਍ഀ 1. South and East: The adjacent property to the south is owned by the USDA਍ഀ White River National Forest, used as open space, and separated from the਍ഀ proposed structure by a large steep hillside. Beyond the steep hillside, to the਍ഀ south and east is 1-70.਍ഀ 2. West: The existing residence to the west (2637 Arosa Drive) is situated at an਍ഀ angle that places the home closer to its western property line than to its east,਍ഀ away from the proposed two-family dwelling (See Attachment A - Vicinity Map).਍ഀ There are several mature trees that exist between the properties that screen the਍ഀ view. The proposed structure is 144 feet from the west property line, 129 feet਍ഀ over the required setback of 15 feet.਍ഀ 3. North: The requested variance shifts the structure further from the existing਍ഀ residences to the north, located across Arosa Drive. The proposed structure is਍ഀ 31 feet from the north, front property line, 11 feet over the required setback of 20਍ഀ feet.਍ഀ 4਍ഀ 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and਍ഀ enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility਍ഀ and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the਍ഀ objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege.਍ഀ The lot configuration, geotechnical recommendations, drainage easement,਍ഀ developable area and grading are all physical hardships on this lot which greatly਍ഀ restrict the ability to construct without a variance. The approval of the requested਍ഀ setback variance would not be a grant of special privilege for the following reasons.਍ഀ Existinq Site Conditions and Configuration: Arosa Drive encroaches onto the਍ഀ property from 4' to 7' on the Northeast end of the property. The encroachment਍ഀ limits the developable area of the site. Managing the snow storage from Arosa਍ഀ Drive that falls onto the site as part of the normal snowplow practice each winter਍ഀ also limits the sites development potential. The site is further limited by the large਍ഀ steep hillside to the south and narrow shape of the lot.਍ഀ 2. Geotechnical Recommendations: The Geotechnical report recommends that the਍ഀ residence be located as far above and away from the existing drainage as਍ഀ possible to maintain and protect the natural flow of drainage. The rear setback਍ഀ on the south side of the property is the location that is highest above and furthest਍ഀ away from the existing drainage flow line.਍ഀ 3. Drainage Easement: The existing flowline of the ditch is outside of the drainage਍ഀ easement. The drainage easement will need to be relocated so that al 5' wide਍ഀ drainage easement is centered on the drainage. Based on the Geotechnical਍ഀ report and soils report, the project is proposing to channel some of the existing਍ഀ open air drainage into a 30" culvert. Due to the inlet and outlet points that are a਍ഀ given this moves the proposed drainage easement further into the site. The਍ഀ Drainage Easement effectively creates an almost 35' deep front setback.਍ഀ 4. Developable Area: The developable area is approximately 4850 sq. ft. (26%) of਍ഀ the overall site - see pink area on attached Site Plan. The proposed residence਍ഀ is pinched on the west, north, and east side of the property due to the drainage਍ഀ easement. The proposed residence has been positioned within the widest points਍ഀ of the remaining developable area.਍ഀ 5. Arosa Drive - Snow Storage/Grading: Because the project is already proposing਍ഀ to culvert part of the open area ditch, the proposed driveway can be placed in the਍ഀ drainage easement over the culvert. The proposed location of the driveway has਍ഀ been positioned to allow for the snow and nuisance drainage from Arosa Drive to਍ഀ flow naturally down the existing hillside into a surface drainage channel with਍ഀ minimal change to the existing drainage. Peak Land consultants has studied the਍ഀ impacts of pulling the driveway towards Arosa Drive to remove the structure out਍ഀ of the setback. Moving the driveway towards Arosa Drive results in a significant਍ഀ reduction of snow storage and the addition of a concrete pan to contain the਍ഀ surface drainage. These could create potential problems for both the Town of਍ഀ Vail snow plow practice, maintenance of the proposed driveway for the property਍ഀ 5਍ഀ owners, and a concrete drainage pan that is not matching the character and tone਍ഀ of the neighborhood.਍ഀ 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,਍ഀ transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public਍ഀ safety.਍ഀ Staff does not believe that approval of the variance will have a negative effect on the਍ഀ factors listed above. The variance is, in part, requested due to the configuration of਍ഀ Arosa Drive, which encroaches up to 7 feet onto the subject property, encompassing਍ഀ 630 sq. ft. of site area. Therefore, the proposed variance allows for the current਍ഀ public street to maintain its current configuration and transportation functions.਍ഀ 4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the਍ഀ proposed variance.਍ഀ Another factor in consideration of the requested variance is that the Planning and਍ഀ Environmental Commission has approved similar setback variances in the਍ഀ neighborhood. The following structures in the neighborhood have been granted਍ഀ setback variances (See attachment C, Setback Variances Map).਍ഀ Location਍ഀ Description਍ഀ Hardship਍ഀ 2696 Davos਍ഀ 1999 - Granted front setback਍ഀ Existing conditions਍ഀ Trail਍ഀ variance from 20 feet to 1 foot to਍ഀ (garage above) and least਍ഀ allow 864 sf of GRFA for a basement਍ഀ affect on neighbors and਍ഀ addition.਍ഀ environment਍ഀ 2701 Davos਍ഀ 1998 - Granted front setback਍ഀ Steep slope਍ഀ Trail਍ഀ variance from 20 feet to 3 feet to਍ഀ allow an elevator addition.਍ഀ 2575 Davos਍ഀ 1994 - Granted rear setback variance਍ഀ Existing conditions:਍ഀ Trail਍ഀ from 15 feet to 7.5 feet and side਍ഀ Garage below and਍ഀ setback variance from 15 feet to 11਍ഀ driveway configuration਍ഀ feet to allow 817 sf for a second story਍ഀ addition over the existing garage.਍ഀ 2576 Davos਍ഀ 1990 - Granted rear setback਍ഀ Shape of the lot and਍ഀ Trail਍ഀ variance from 15 feet to 11.5 feet to਍ഀ existing conditions਍ഀ allow for a bedroom addition.਍ഀ (landscaping)਍ഀ 1997 - Granted side setback variance਍ഀ from 15 feet to 11 feet to allow 462 sf਍ഀ for a garage addition.਍ഀ Vlll. STAFF RECOMMENDATION਍ഀ The Community Development Department recommends approval, with conditions, of a਍ഀ variance from 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances,਍ഀ Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a new two-family dwelling, located at 2657਍ഀ Arosa Drive/Lot 8, Block C, Vail Ridge, and setting forth details in regard thereto. This਍ഀ recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VI of this਍ഀ memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented.਍ഀ 6਍ഀ Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance਍ഀ request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the਍ഀ following motion:਍ഀ "The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the applicant's request fora਍ഀ variance from 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17,਍ഀ Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a new two-family਍ഀ dwelling, located at 2657 Arosa Drive/Lot 8, Block C, Vail Ridge, and setting forth਍ഀ details in regard thereto, subject to the following conditions:਍ഀ Design Review:਍ഀ 1. This approval shall be contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town of਍ഀ Vail approval of a design review application.਍ഀ Building Permit.਍ഀ 2. The applicant must obtain final review and approval of a site specific਍ഀ hazard study (As described in Section 12-21-13, Restrictions in਍ഀ Geologically Sensitive Areas, Vail Town Code), by the Town of Vail਍ഀ Community Development Department, prior to the issuance of a building਍ഀ permit.਍ഀ Certificate of Occupancy:਍ഀ 3. The applicant shall record a plat of the property, including an approved਍ഀ drainage easement, prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of਍ഀ Occupancy, or Certificate of Occupancy.਍ഀ Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance਍ഀ request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes਍ഀ the following findings:਍ഀ "The Planning and Environmental Commission finds:਍ഀ 1. The granting of this variance will not constitute a granting of special privilege਍ഀ inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family਍ഀ Primary/ Secondary District, based upon the review outlined in Section VI of the਍ഀ Staff's July 13, 2009 memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission.਍ഀ 2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or਍ഀ welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, based਍ഀ upon the review outlined in Section VI of the Staff's July 13, 2009, memorandum to਍ഀ the Planning and Environmental Commission.਍ഀ 3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons:਍ഀ a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would਍ഀ result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the਍ഀ objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, based upon the਍ഀ review outlined in Section VI of the Staff's July 13, 2009, memorandum to the਍ഀ Planning and Environmental Commission.਍ഀ 7਍ഀ b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable਍ഀ to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in਍ഀ the same district, based upon the review outlined in Section VI of the Staffs July਍ഀ 13, 2009, memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission.਍ഀ c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would਍ഀ deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in਍ഀ the same district, based upon the review outlined in Section VI of the Staff's July਍ഀ 13, 2009, memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission."਍ഀ IX. ATTACHMENTS਍ഀ A. Vicinity Map਍ഀ B. Letter from Engineer/ Sections਍ഀ C. Setback Variances Map਍ഀ D. Public Notice਍ഀ E. Plans਍ഀ 8਍ഀ Attachment & Vicinity Map਍ഀ Attachment B: Letter from Engineer/ Sections਍ഀ PEAK਍ഀ INC.਍ഀ June 30, 2009 PLC Job#: 1695਍ഀ -Nina Timm਍ഀ Senior Housing Coordinator਍ഀ Town of Vail਍ഀ RE: i:osa Duplex - Site Constraints਍ഀ DRAEN AGE਍ഀ The original intent ilrotigh the RFP for drainage conveyance through the property was to਍ഀ convey the stream through an open ditch and only pipe a section under the driveway. As the਍ഀ design process has progressed it has been shown that the width of the drainage is taken up by਍ഀ the structure, driveway and back-out and does not allow for open channel flow. therefore, the਍ഀ drainage must be piped through the property.਍ഀ The storm pipe will be required to have a 15' easement and due to drainage patterns and਍ഀ alignment constraints. the pipe dill nun through the center of the property: thus constraining the਍ഀ buildable area.਍ഀ SNON87 STORAGE਍ഀ The site plan developed by VAG that shows the structure within the setback allows for a਍ഀ shallow ditch adjacent to Arosa Drive. With this layout, the shallow ditch will capture਍ഀ nuisance drainage and sediment due to snowmelt from stockpiled snow on. Arosa Drive.਍ഀ If the structure and driveway were moved to the north 3'. this would greatly impact the amount਍ഀ of snow storage for die roadway. (See Attachment) The reduction would only allow for਍ഀ approximately 1./4 the amount of snow to be stored. 111ovin2 the driveway 3' would place the਍ഀ edge of driveway at the bottom of the slope from Arosa Drive, eliminating the shallow ditch਍ഀ then requiring a concrete pan to handle the nuisance flows. All sediment from Arosa Drive਍ഀ will now be channeled through the duple: property.਍ഀ L. Mark Luna਍ഀ Vice President /਍ഀ Senior Project Manager਍ഀ 10਍ഀ 1000 LION'S RIDGE LOOP,. VAIL CO 81657਍ഀ 970A76-8644 FAX 970-476-8616਍ഀ t!3਍ഀ U਍ഀ its਍ഀ 4-J਍ഀ ill਍ഀ {f}਍ഀ Attachment C: Setback Variances Map਍ഀ 12਍ഀ Attachment D: Public Notice਍ഀ TOWN OF PAIL਍ഀ THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY਍ഀ PUBLIC NOTICE਍ഀ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of਍ഀ Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on July 13,਍ഀ 2009, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of:਍ഀ A request for a final review of a variance from 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to਍ഀ Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a new two-family਍ഀ dwelling, located at 2657 Arosa Drive/Lot 8, Block C, Vail Ridge, and setting forth details in regard਍ഀ thereto. (PEC090021)਍ഀ Applicant: Nina Timm, Town of Vail਍ഀ Planner: Nicole Peterson਍ഀ The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during਍ഀ office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.਍ഀ The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public਍ഀ hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call 970-479-2138 for਍ഀ additional information.਍ഀ Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please call਍ഀ 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.਍ഀ Published June 26, 2009, in the Vail Daily.਍ഀ 13਍ഀ i਍ഀ I`~I਍ഀ ~ jl,\1 IzF I~. 4~• \਍ഀ 1 ( I• I I/ / / \ \ +k' \ is਍ഀ I਍ഀ US,਍ഀ I \ 1਍ഀ - - 1I y ir਍ഀ I 1 I਍ഀ jl-਍ഀ I _ - ytr ` I li਍ഀ ! ~ f'~ ~ ~ 11 ~ IC I ' ~j• I, 1 a ri V'.਍ഀ r; 1 I _ _-I-- 1I i! it/L`\L, c t`਍ഀ - _I਍ഀ I n f u ~ ~.y'~ ; r;਍ഀ a.. i ;਍ഀ T, AW਍ഀ ban਍ഀ N Ci i4+'~਍ഀ P HIMIN RY a not @r constru~ inra ~G਍ഀ r b ~ _ Town of Vail਍ഀ o a ' g Arosa Drive Duplex਍ഀ Arose Drive, Vail, Colorado i n਍ഀ i 3਍ഀ N 0557.40 E ' Q5YS e R R E~ ?S N਍ഀ ` ;32.50.਍ഀ 1 ~1 S4R f¢P : VE? ° T4਍ഀ I I" bF^ R~3 ~a 3 ?Y਍ഀ € z਍ഀ Egg j .S Rf -਍ഀ 1 I 36 8Ri 5 ^E਍ഀ ~ II I 3YV ~ DI ( ¢਍ഀ v c I gj PI A A Fs਍ഀ 1 1\ ¢SxSA 5°5~਍ഀ 1 R~ 8~ ~3 R਍ഀ 1਍ഀ A$g 5਍ഀ S਍ഀ yy \ D਍ഀ \ \ ®I\I s3$s;਍ഀ 9 m 9~0 Ysex਍ഀ R \ y~ Op \ y ' •਍ഀ 0 \ P਍ഀ 0 o \ o.਍ഀ N O V \ O• \਍ഀ 4. _ o aa C. h \ Va਍ഀ All਍ഀ I਍ഀ r਍ഀ 1਍ഀ 1 I ~ x: O ti਍ഀ 1਍ഀ \ gar. /^I ~ e=.nk C਍ഀ 11 , i I ~ 4:.^F 7਍ഀ ak ~e lqT~ /਍ഀ o$ R a /t ~ D m਍ഀ O )t A v਍ഀ d a k਍ഀ ii਍ഀ i਍ഀ i਍ഀ i਍ഀ I;਍ഀ 4i b਍ഀ I਍ഀ i਍ഀ i਍ഀ i਍ഀ fi਍ഀ b਍ഀ oa PRELIMINARY: not for construction਍ഀ DDD਍ഀ Town of Vail਍ഀ T਍ഀ ° ° a s਍ഀ Arosa Drive Duplex਍ഀ a- P਍ഀ Arosa Drive, Vail, Colorado਍ഀ - f Y `਍ഀ n਍ഀ - m਍ഀ A਍ഀ r਍ഀ m਍ഀ m਍ഀ r਍ഀ -D਍ഀ r਍ഀ D਍ഀ z਍ഀ ft਍ഀ F਍ഀ II I I I I I਍ഀ II I I I I I਍ഀ II I I I I I਍ഀ --------i------- - -------t਍ഀ I I I I I਍ഀ I I I I I਍ഀ I I I I i਍ഀ e..µ.਍ഀ I µ I I਍ഀ b~ b ~ b਍ഀ u® PRELIMINARY a not for construction ®e਍ഀ y਍ഀ -਍ഀ b c਍ഀ ; o y =਍ഀ DDD਍ഀ Town of Vail਍ഀ Arosa Drive Duplex਍ഀ ਍ഀ ;Y਍ഀ I਍ഀ Arosa Drive, Vall, Colorado਍ഀ ਍ഀ "਍ഀ EUMPIO _ a not for Construction਍ഀ y਍ഀ ~਍ഀ 0਍ഀ Town of Vail਍ഀ Arosa Drive Duplex਍ഀ Ar- Drive, Vail, Colnrado਍ഀ r਍ഀ n਍ഀ REVI WARY p not Wor cavashr dior਍ഀ 69਍ഀ Y r - i = E Town of Vail e +਍ഀ 3਍ഀ N j o f 5 Arosa Drive Duplex z r f 3; y t`਍ഀ y Arosa Driec, Vail, Colorado Ell਍ഀ 1਍ഀ Variance Request਍ഀ Application for Review by the jU JUN 17 ~~R~ra s਍ഀ L਍ഀ Planning and Environmental Commission TOWN OF V.22 -਍ഀ General Information: Variances may be granted in order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and un-਍ഀ necessary physical hardships as would result from the strict interpretation and/or enforcement of the zoning regulations਍ഀ inconsistent with the development objectives of the Town of Vail. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship਍ഀ may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic਍ഀ or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations or con-਍ഀ ditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation਍ഀ shall not be a reason for granting a variance. The Vail Town Code can be found on the Town's website at਍ഀ www.vailgov.com The proposed project may also require other permits or applications and/or review by the Design Re-਍ഀ view Board and/or Town Council.਍ഀ Fee:਍ഀ Description of the Request: e" ~ a-4ti LSD l~ / ~c 1 ~1 r ~ti ✓I਍ഀ Physical Address:਍ഀ Parcel Number: (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)਍ഀ Property Owner: 1~m 11,4n~਍ഀ Mailing Address:' P y2~~ .਍ഀ Phone: 2-19਍ഀ XOwner's Signature: ~Jl/1/~ v 6਍ഀ Primary Contact/ Owner Represe tative: J&(, 42:L~'-Iet4r Z Z-Z're(-'JV Lu-0h਍ഀ 81o cf਍ഀ Mailing Address: L Ltmzu VN V= :Z/ lo਍ഀ Phone: 7 0 f y 7਍ഀ E-Mail: Fax:਍ഀ For Office Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # Check #਍ഀ Fee Paid: tjt~ v~ Received Fro .਍ഀ Meeting Date:D PEC No.: C 2-(਍ഀ Planner: Project No: .~0 1 -0agJ਍ഀ Zoning:਍ഀ Location of the Proposal਍ഀ Land Use:਍ഀ Lot: Block:_ Subdivision:਍ഀ VA..਍ഀ ~VAg, Inc.਍ഀ Architects & Planners਍ഀ Memo:਍ഀ Project Name: TOV Arosa Drive Duplex Project No: 2910.00਍ഀ Date: 06.30.09਍ഀ RE: Rear Yard Setback Variance਍ഀ FROM: Stephanie Lord-Johnson VAg, Inc Architects and Planners਍ഀ TO: TOV staff and PEC਍ഀ Remarks:਍ഀ We are requesting a rear yard setback variance for the proposed TOV Affordable Housing Duplex at 2657 Arosa Drive.਍ഀ The project is zoned Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential which has a 15' rear setback. Our proposed plans show਍ഀ the duplex extending a maximum of 5' into the rear setback.਍ഀ The.417 acre lot is limited with a small developable area (see attached diagram). The many unique conditions on the site਍ഀ combine together and result in a hardship that is unique to this site and would warrant relief from the 15' rear setback due to਍ഀ the following:਍ഀ Existing Site Conditions/Configuration਍ഀ • Arosa Drive encroaches on to the property from 4' to 7' on the North East end of the property (see gray area on਍ഀ attached Site Plan diagram).਍ഀ • As further clarified in Item #4, managing the snow storage from Arosa Drive that falls onto the site as part of the਍ഀ normal snowplow practice each winter is a concern.਍ഀ • The site is a basically a large bowl with a hillside to North and South with the drainage ditch creating the low spot਍ഀ on the northern (Arosa Drive) side of the property.਍ഀ 2. Geotechnical Recommendations਍ഀ • The Geotechnical report recommends that the residence be located as far above and away from the existing drainage਍ഀ as possible.਍ഀ • The rear setback on the south side of the property is the location that is highest above and furthest away from the਍ഀ existing drainage flow line.਍ഀ 3. Drainage Easement਍ഀ • The existing flowline of the ditch is outside of the drainage easement. The drainage easement will need to be਍ഀ relocated so that a15' wide drainage easement is centered on the drainage.਍ഀ • Based on the Geotechnical report and soils report, the project is proposing to channel some of the existing open air਍ഀ drainage into a 30" culvert. Due to the inlet and outlet points that are a given this moves the proposed drainage਍ഀ easement further into the site.਍ഀ • The Drainage Easement effectively creates an almost 35' deep front setback (see blue area on attached Site Plan)਍ഀ 4. Developable Area਍ഀ • The developable area is approximately 4850 sq ft or 26% of the overall site - see pink area on attached Site Plan .਍ഀ • The proposed residence is pinched on the west, north, and east side of the property due to the drainage easement਍ഀ Physical Address: (970) 949-7034 Mailing Address:਍ഀ 90 Benchmark Rd., Suite 202 fax: (970) 949-8134 P.O. Box 1734਍ഀ Avon, CO 81620 email: general@vagarchitects.com Vail, CO 81658-1734਍ഀ • The proposed residence has been positioned within the widest points of the remaining developable area.਍ഀ 4 Arosa Drive - Snow Storage/Grading਍ഀ • Because the project is already proposing to culvert part of the open area ditch, the proposed driveway can be placed਍ഀ in the drainage easement over the culvert. The proposed location of the driveway has been positioned to allow for਍ഀ the snow and nuisance drainage from Arosa Drive to flow naturally down the existing hillside into a surface਍ഀ drainage channel with minimal change to the existing drainage.਍ഀ • Peak Land has study the impacts of pulling the driveway into the hillside below Arosa Drive so that we could pull਍ഀ the structure out the setback. As noted in their attached letter and sections, pulling the driveway 3' towards Arosa਍ഀ Drive results in a significant reduction of snow storage and the addition of a concrete pan to contain the surface਍ഀ drainage. These could create potential problems for both the TOV snow plow practice, maintenance of the਍ഀ proposed driveway for the property owners, and a concrete drainage pan that is not matching the character and tone਍ഀ of the neighborhood.਍ഀ Rear Setback਍ഀ • The rear setback is on the south side of the property. This is a sloping hillside bording National Forest property.਍ഀ • The request to reduce this rear setback does not impact light, air, or vies of any neighboring properties.਍ഀ • We are only requesting to extend the actual structure 3'. There is an elevated fireplace bump out that extends an਍ഀ additional 2' in the setback for approximately 6' of the East Unit which increase the officially request for a਍ഀ maximum 5' encroachment into the set back.਍ഀ • The request 3' to 5' encroachment is the maximum requested because otherwise we run into grading issues on the਍ഀ south side of the residence.਍ഀ GRFA/Zoning Regulations਍ഀ • The proposed project complies with all other TOV zoning regulations.਍ഀ • The proposed duplex is allowed 6911 sq ft of GRFA. The proposed solution is only using 3,235 sq ft of GRFA.਍ഀ • The proposed project site coverage is 13% of the site area and we are allowed up to 20%.਍ഀ • The proposed project landscaping is 71% of the site area and we are only required to provide 60%.਍ഀ In summary, due to the conditions above there is a hardship unique to this property that warrants relief from the rear setback਍ഀ regulation. Additionally, this variation allows the project to blend into the existing neighborhood with a two story structure਍ഀ nestled into the hillside.਍ഀ Physical Address: (970) 949-7034 Mailing Address:਍ഀ 90 Benchmark Rd., Suite 202 fax: (970) 949-8134 P.O. Box 1734਍ഀ Avon, CO 81620 email: general@vagarchitects.com Vail, CO 81658-1734਍ഀ Zoning Analysis਍ഀ 2657 Arosa Drive਍ഀ Existing Lot Area - 18,164 sq ft (.417 acre)਍ഀ GRFA - 6911 sq ft allowed਍ഀ Proposed GRFA -3,235 sq ft plus 750 sq ft of garage਍ഀ Unit A - 1,617.50 sq ft਍ഀ 2,529.10 remaining GRFA (assuming 60% of GRFA dedicated to Unit A)਍ഀ Unit B - 1,617.50 sq ft਍ഀ 1,146.90 remaining GRFA (assuming 40% GRFA dedicated to Unit B)਍ഀ Site Coverage - 20% allowed (3,632.9 sq ft)਍ഀ Proposed Site Coverage -13% (2,420.50 sq ft)਍ഀ Building - 763.25 sq ft per unit਍ഀ Garage - 424.00 sq ft per unit਍ഀ Covered Entry - 23.00 sq ft per unit਍ഀ 1,210.25 per unit or 2, 420.50 sq ft total਍ഀ Landscape Area - 60 % required (10,898.70)਍ഀ Proposed Landscaping Area - 71% (13,013.50 sq ft)਍ഀ Building - 2420.50 sq ft਍ഀ Driveway - 2,592.50 sq ft਍ഀ Covered Entry - 138 sq ft਍ഀ Total 5,151 sq ft਍ഀ Physical Address: (970) 949-7034 Mailing Address:਍ഀ 90 Benchmark Rd., Suite 202 fax: (970) 949-8134 P.O. Box 1734਍ഀ Avon, CO 81620 email: general@vagarchitects.com Vail, CO 81658-1734਍ഀ I਍ഀ ` * 6਍ഀ P 9਍ഀ 21 2556 2507਍ഀ / 3 4਍ഀ 2 / 2572 2517਍ഀ 2613 1਍ഀ 2600਍ഀ 2 256 2527਍ഀ 3 2602 2565਍ഀ 2633਍ഀ 3 21577 5 /਍ഀ 4 2212਍ഀ VAIL RIDGE਍ഀ 264, / 2624 24 5਍ഀ 2 258 /257 253਍ഀ 5 5 23 7਍ഀ e '਍ഀ z_਍ഀ X 2653 2632 2605 / 24 2547/ 2558਍ഀ / 22਍ഀ 6 2642 2609 3 2557/ 25਍ഀ 2666਍ഀ 73 p 259 /਍ഀ 7 / 2662 2616 / 2 29 2568਍ഀ 2683 260 / - 2਍ഀ 8 20 1 10 2572਍ഀ 8 \ 2672 2635 / 2616/ 2579 24਍ഀ P਍ഀ 2693 e 9 19 2626 21 2576 2427਍ഀ 2703 ~'O 2682 2645਍ഀ 2 12 1਍ഀ 2610 2618 55 263 2607 \Jt~ 2578 23਍ഀ / 11 O~ 1 2499਍ഀ 11 17 265 2617 \ 2586਍ഀ 2702 2695 / 10 OgP 2 \਍ഀ 12 \ 2712 16 266 2627 pe' 3 2608਍ഀ 2722 2699 OP 5 / 9 261਍ഀ 15 2686 \ X37 2648਍ഀ 2701਍ഀ 2705 6 7 8਍ഀ 2696 2651਍ഀ / ,਍ഀ A pw(k, ~OV਍ഀ V1000਍ഀ S6,1 h਍ഀ 2਍ഀ V1.਍ഀ Bg~l਍ഀ kYO!~A V*਍ഀ C,o f, 16 5਍ഀ ~avt ~aS Lv~~ l~ar~਍ഀ 0' VLr਍ഀ U਍ഀ A਍ഀ TOWN OF PAIL਍ഀ THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY਍ഀ PUBLIC NOTICE਍ഀ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the਍ഀ Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town਍ഀ Code, on July 13, 2009, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in਍ഀ consideration of:਍ഀ A request for a final review of a variance from 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code,਍ഀ pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a਍ഀ new two-family dwelling, located at 2657 Arosa Drive/Lot 8, Block C, Vail Ridge, and਍ഀ setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090021)਍ഀ \ Applicant: Nina Timm, Town of Vail਍ഀ .A~I\`- 0਍ഀ Planner: Nicole Peterson਍ഀ ! The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection਍ഀ during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South਍ഀ Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that਍ഀ precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.਍ഀ Please call 970-479-2138 for additional information.਍ഀ Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please਍ഀ call 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.਍ഀ Published June 26, 2009, in the Vail Daily.਍ഀ 1਍ഀ sJ/ 1਍ഀ T਍ഀ K+s 3/Dw਍ഀ ..ic''. 4m , S: f.' ,may ,਍ഀ ~ ~ .':i• M MCP ~ V T . ~ ~r rs~p i;.i਍ഀ Oow਍ഀ tl਍ഀ t~a^ k 4 i਍ഀ s਍ഀ xr ~ ! , u a਍ഀ f.਍ഀ .~t I MI"'i.'਍ഀ s 4਍ഀ raw਍ഀ a r਍ഀ t਍ഀ x fi਍ഀ S c਍ഀ fit.' r Z u,s਍ഀ Y ~ ~ t I1~਍ഀ ik਍ഀ f ! d਍ഀ - : .taY4 iyi~ _ v fX . .Y,.''t 1 ~ wi f ~ ti /i r a ~t~~' ~~M1M1.. s ~ O.਍ഀ ate' ~ } .y.4n ~1 A' Ka. .x i t~ ~ r F~y• SCR '~x'1. RSy~S. ~ y4,1`F~_..'਍ഀ q,.r~ .'Y^ f~'~ ~ •a`Xdi ~C' ~ N v „F V ~ as i ~ 4 ~ k k• x.਍ഀ '~-C'"'~'~+:.iD~4 - _.a r ~ !t _•-•~.,vy . }-".r.. ,`f~a~i ~ Y .w ::ate' ~ ~iu~... '਍ഀ ,~~~~If਍ഀ ._..,f.਍ഀ ;MK YA਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ~?%v.਍ഀ .,~r਍ഀ t~ ,K਍ഀ ਍ഀ w-਍ഀ r~rb i 4਍ഀ ~r 4਍ഀ haaa£5 { ~਍ഀ . 5 ~ i਍ഀ f ~਍ഀ 4 3 '~a!਍ഀ ' hi-. f, rte' '਍ഀ ~ ~h 0਍ഀ ~Jn Y਍ഀ tT.C ~ _ _ ~਍ഀ a4. ~ ..wT~~.. ~ a.~ ~ 'ii. -.fie਍ഀ ~ y~ f.਍ഀ ~~ys 1. ~ ~਍ഀ 4 ~ aye ~ yy ~ y਍ഀ .M' 1 i਍ഀ T਍ഀ }਍ഀ ਍ഀ ~1'~਍ഀ i਍ഀ ਍ഀ Y਍ഀ 6਍ഀ ~a~Cin~er?J. ~ A.•਍ഀ YY* ai '~1•''Y l਍ഀ PIN਍ഀ v -਍ഀ ~r਍ഀ ਍ഀ v V/਍ഀ 't਍ഀ {਍ഀ ( + • l਍ഀ ~ {਍ഀ ELi਍ഀ i I਍ഀ J਍ഀ ~਍ഀ a਍ഀ 1਍ഀ s਍ഀ inp਍ഀ ~,/1 tt ~ i4 v. J tt਍ഀ 7►. f N `~f਍ഀ ~Y਍ഀ ~rrj ,.~Q4Y਍ഀ w a਍ഀ n਍ഀ /07 02/2009) Nicole Peterson - Re: Arosa Duplex plans Page 1਍ഀ From: Mike McGee਍ഀ To: Nicole Peterson਍ഀ Date: 7/2/2009 11:58 AM਍ഀ Subject: Re: Arosa Duplex plans਍ഀ CC: Fire-Inspectors; George Ruther਍ഀ The Fire Dept can approve the site plan as submitted without a fire sprinkler system.਍ഀ Staging will be necessary in the driveway to meet the 150 ft rule.਍ഀ We do request a monitored fire alarm system.਍ഀ Mike McGee਍ഀ Deputy Chief਍ഀ Vail Fire & Emergency Services਍ഀ Nicole Peterson 07/01/2009 3:38 PM਍ഀ Please find attached revised plans for the Arosa Duplex, employee housing project (PEC09-0021). Please have comments to me by਍ഀ next Tuesday, July 7, 2009. Thanks much!਍ഀ Nicole਍ഀ M wQD i W M rUn , N i v~e_਍ഀ ,kA.., t t C- w { t Qr&jc-਍ഀ June 25, 2009: Arosa Duplex Meeting Outline਍ഀ Objective:਍ഀ Brainstorm site design options that eliminate the need for a setback variance, are cost effective਍ഀ and meet all other Town requirements.਍ഀ Background:਍ഀ The Town of Vail Staff has reviewed the PEC application for the proposed new two-family਍ഀ residence (2 employee housing units) located at 2657 Arosa Drive, Vail (PEC09-0021). This਍ഀ proposal is tentatively scheduled for review by the PEC at its July 13, 2009 public hearing. The਍ഀ following is a summary of the comments from the Staff review-਍ഀ Topics-਍ഀ 1. Does adequate hardship exist to recommend approval of the proposed rear setback਍ഀ variance from 15 feet to -11-12 feet on the south side?਍ഀ 2. Proposed pipeline/ drainage:਍ഀ • Existing flow line is not within the existing easement.਍ഀ • If a pipeline is constructed, it will require a dedicated easement, 15 feet in width਍ഀ (pipeline center)-_j I iw~~-਍ഀ • No building can encroach on said easement.਍ഀ • Driveways may encroach on said easement.਍ഀ 3. Wetland: Plan needs to be updated? Process? Effect on Variance?਍ഀ 4. Utilities:਍ഀ • ERWSD: 2 separate lines for 2 meters - tap fee on 2nd unit, 1st unity਍ഀ C.,,es grandfathered in. - _਍ഀ ~I~ SS oN (OYem North elevation is location of gas meters (must be 3 feet from opening਍ഀ A~t or/ windows and vents. Must be under an eaye/ protected from snow. PW jr਍ഀ vement moratorium (Arosa resurfaced in 2006 - 5 year moratorium). Kit ~~W਍ഀ ail: "It appears that there is a gas stub into the property. Remarks on the਍ഀ service card state that the crew cut off 29' of a 63' service lateral. It also states਍ഀ that the "cut-off is at the bottom of a bank". It is a 314" steel service. We will਍ഀ couple plastic pipe with the steel pipe and run to the new location. If the lot is not਍ഀ subdivided, there will be one service lateral with a 2 meter header. A plumber਍ഀ would have to pipe over to the opposite half of the duplex to serve that side."਍ഀ 5. Re-plat:਍ഀ Required for pipeline easement.਍ഀ Start process now?਍ഀ • How to plat? Lots 1&2 or Units A&B with common parcel C? (If 2 separate lots,਍ഀ gas/ water lines cannot cross property lines without easements)਍ഀ 6. Building Department: proposed building must be a minimum of 3 feet from property lines਍ഀ 7. Fire Department: No sprinkler required. Comment that the more room they have on the਍ഀ south side, the better. 15-0, 4"" "1਍ഀ 8. Proposed driveway: Lots of pavement Could we reduce?-' l S` '਍ഀ 9. If the setback variance is pursued, the site plan shall include the proposed fire places,਍ഀ which are illustrated on the floor plans, in order to determine exact building਍ഀ encroachment into the setback.਍ഀ b ~ 4 "d ovt 1 1 ~~viv~, S~arid਍ഀ .਍ഀ 4 dC GC ? k d [A਍ഀ Q , 06,-9-਍ഀ fd,,,,ys਍ഀ Id, t਍ഀ C04- I਍ഀ LA re਍ഀ Ilk਍ഀ ILLS U 6,U-.C਍ഀ