The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDRB100082Design Review hoard r .1 $ 1 0. Ir M10i 0 ('OIL I ;Is] khL.161 M'M� '0% 1 r r000F TDigf OF VAU; Depa ent of Community Development 75 South Fro ntiage Road, Vail, Colorado 165 tel mo 97Q.479.2139 fax: 970m479 m 2452 web: www.vai lgay.com Project Name: Project Description: Participants: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE OWNER SOLIS, LUIS &REBECCA 3981 PROMONTORY CT BOULDER CO 80304 APPLICANT BLUELINE ARCHITECTS, P. PO BOX 574 MINTURN CO 81645 License: 0000002400 ARCHITECT BLUELINE ARCHITECTS, P. PO BOX 574 MINTURN CO 81645 License: 0000002400 Project Address: Legal Description: 2180 ALPINE DR VAIL Location : Lot: 22 Block: Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE WEST FIL 1 Parcel Number: 2103- 123 - 1201 -7 Comments: BOARD /STAFF ACTION Action: CONCEPT Conditions: Cond: 200 (PLAN): A conceptual review is NOT a Design Review Board approval. Cond: 51 (FIRE 2007): MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REQUIRED AND SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 72(2007) AND VFES STANDARDS. Cond: 53 (FIRE 2007) Monitored fire sprinkler system required and shall comply with NFPA 13 (2007) and VFES Standards. 03/29/2010 DRB Number: DRB100082 C. 03/29/2010 Phone: 970 - 827 -5400 C. 03/29/2010 Phone: 970-827-5400 Planner: RACHEL FRIEDE Department. of Community Development- d., 75 South Frontage Road ' Vai4; C'¢Loradcw.. ►i. a ?E' � Ft t . - d, . Application for Design Review Conceptual Review MAR 2 9 1010 General Information: A conceptual review may be requested by an applicant wh ndA� v2k4a changes are to occur on a property. A conceptual review does not serve as a final approval and an additional applica- tion is required for final review. The conceptual review is intended to allow the applicant to introduce the project to the Design Review Board and receive comments. The DRB does not vote on conceptual reviews. Fee: $0 V / Single Family Duplex Multi - Family Commercial Description of the Request: G , D AGepA R-41 D KJ3• Qe✓,e �,- G ALA/ 3 rP_S cA_tAce. �-� acc&,ssel o �� Sl C'1 ra( 1 C 4 I i ( ACS I b _ e- C`, 4 Physical Address: 2-1 0 P (n �r Parcel Number: 2-1 - I Z 3- I Z - *1 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970 - 328 -8640 for parcel no.) Property Owner: I LL, (S uAA b e.. 6 al' S Mailing Address: �� C'D r OK r�' 1 o ff tr' �Q 30 3O 7zo - 8 7 — sob s Owner's Signatu V : S+k t S�uMrhe,�' Primary Contact/ Own 12- r Representative: ar' Mailing Address: Sa c 57 l +x f'i1 - ! $16 q Phone: 1 1 70 - 3 - 10•' 6 70 f E -Mail: S"+'N4 s Cdlkn Fax: c l 70' 92 7 - 5 For Office Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # Check # Fee Paid: Waived Received From: Meeting D ate: T � j 0 DRB No.: i 6 Planner: Project No: tO - () Zoning: Land Use: Location of the Proposal: Lot: Block: Subdivision: y YMoi- e i 01- Jan -10 (04/09/2010) Rachel Friede -Solis Residence DRB1 00082 Page 1 From: Rachel Friede To: Stuart Brurnmett CC: Rachel Friede Date: 4/9/2010 11:18 AM Subject: Solis Residence DRB100082 Stuart- Sorry you had to wait so long at the meeting on Wednesday. Below are the comments I noted from the DRB regarding the Solis Residence: 1. If you utilize contemporary design, then you should use muted materials, in color and type. 2. The design is pushing the limits on lines and forms. 3. Metal would be a good building material to incorporate. 4. Stucco would tie it back into the neighborhood. 5. Muted colors should come from surrounding landscape- grey is acceptable. 6. Too much contrast between colors 7. Match paint to browns in stone. 8. Roof materials must be aesthetically pleasing, even if only one neighbor can see it. These are of course in addition to my comments that I sent you on Wednesday. If you have questions or c let me know. Im happy to sit down with you when you are getting ready to submit. Rachel Friede,, AICP, LEED AP Town Planner Town of Vail Community Development Dept. 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 Ph: (970)479 -2440 Fax: (970)479 -2452 www.vailgov.com/comdev Conceptual Review of the Solis Residence, 2810 Alpine Drive, DRB100082 Staff Comments: 1. Applicant will need a side setback variance for carport and garage or must redesign the project to remove these encroachments. 2. Garage may encroach into the front setback due to 30% grades, per Section 12- 21 -12. 3. Per Section 12- 21 -12, the Applicant will be required to submit a soil and foundation investigation, a topographic survey prepared by a registered surveyor, with contour intervals of not more than two feet (2'), site grading and drainage plan, a detailed plan of retaining walls or cuts and fills in excess of five feet (5'), a detailed revegetation plan, 4. GRFA calculations are incorrect- credit is only given for LOWEST level below grade, not all levels below grade. Staff calculated 2406 sq ft of GRFA (with 4987 sq ft allowed). 5. Since GRFA is actually 2406 sq ft, parking requirements, per 12- 10 -10, Parking Requirements, is 3 spaces. The applicant must have another parking space on -site (not in right -of -way). 6. Snow storage required on -site (not in right -of -way) for 10% of on -site driveway area. Need to have access to snow storage areas. (See 14 -5 -2, Other Requirements) 7. Does design meet requirements for compatibility in design, per Section 14 -10 -2? 8. (FIRE 2007): MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REQUIRED AND SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 72(2007) AND VFES STANDARDS. 9. (FIRE 2007) Monitored fire sprinkler system required and shall comply with NFPA 13 (2007) and VFES Standards. 12- 21 -12: RESTRICTIONS IN SPECIFIC ZONES ON EXCESSIVE SLOPES (in part): The following additional special restrictions or requirements shall apply to development on any lot in a hillside residential, single - family residential, two - family residential or two - family primary/secondary residential district where the average slope of the site beneath the existing or proposed structure and parking area is in excess of thirty percent (3 %): 1. Not more than ten percent (10 %) of the total site area may be covered by driveways and surface parking. 2. In order to protect the natural landform and vegetation on steep slopes, not more than sixty percent (60 %) of the total site area may be disturbed from present conditions by construction activities. The design review board (DRB) may approve site disturbance in excess of the sixty percent (60 %) maximum if specific design criteria warrant the extent of the requested deviation. J. A minimum of one covered parking space shall be provided for each dwelling unit. K. Setbacks, as they apply to this chapter, as required by sections 12 -6A -6 , 12 -613-6 12 -6C- 6 and 12 -6D -6 of this title, are amended as follows: There shall be no required front setback for garages, except as may be required by the design review board. Garages located in the front setback, as provided for in this section, shall be limited to one story in height (not to exceed 10 feet) with the addition of a pitched or flat roof and subject to review and approval by the design review board. L. Retaining walls up to six feet (6') in height may be permitted in the setback by the design review board when associated with a permitted garage as referenced in subsection K of this section 14 -5 -2: OTHER REQUIREMENTS: D. Snow Storage: All required parking and access areas shall be designed to accommodate on site snow storage (i.e., within boundaries of lot and not within the right of way). Turf areas and other areas without trees may be utilized for this purpose. 2. Heated drives: A minimum functional area equaling ten percent (10 %) of the paved area shall be provided contiguous to the paved area and designed to accommodate snow storage. 14 -10 -2: GENERAL COMPATIBILITY: A. Structures shall be compatible with existing structures, their surroundings, and with Vail's environment. It is not to be inferred that buildings must look alike to be compatible. Compatibility can be achieved through the proper consideration of scale, proportions, site planning, landscaping, materials and colors, and compliance with the guidelines herein contained. B. Any building site in Vail is likely to have its own unique landforms and features. Whenever possible, these existing features should be preserved and reinforced by new construction. The objective is to fit the buildings to their sites in a way that leaves the natural landforms and features intact, treating the buildings as an integral part of the site, rather than as isolated objects at odds with their surroundings.