The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutB10-0078 � Community Development Department 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado USA 81657 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY This certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of Title 10, Section 10-1-2, ADOPTED CODES of the Vail Town Code certifying that, at the time of issuance, this structure was found to be substantially in compliance with the various ordinances of the town regulating building construction or use for the following: Name and description of project Duplex Address of project: 395/ 405 Farest Road Owner name and address: Forest Road Development LLC 8120 Woodmont Ave.,Bethesda,Md 20814 IRC Edition: 2009 Occupancy Group(s): R3 Type(s) of Construction: VB Permit Number(s):B10-0078 _Occupant Load: NA Sprinkler System Y/N Type:13 �o z�f 20� � Martin Haeberle, Chief Building Official Date �� I 51 Eagle Road#2 ^ P O Drawer 5400 � Avon,Colorado 81620 R.�.� � � � � � t.970.949.5152 BUILDING MOUNTAIN RESORT COMMUMTIES f.970.949.4379 www.ranelson.com November 17, 2011 Martin Haeberle, Building Official Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 RE: BP10-0078, 395 and 405 Forest Rd. Mr. Haeberle: There are two outstanding items to be completed before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. They are: l. Landscaping 2. Full cut-off exterior light fixtures These items are to be completed by June 29, 2012. As of this writing, I have just been informed by Mike Foster, the architect, that the Drainage Easement Agreement, the third item on the inspection list, has been accepted and that Leonard Sandoval has signed off on Public Works. Respectfully, G� �- /� `" � Darryl Lundholm, Project Superintendent/R.A. Nelson and Assoc., Inc. p � � � � �I � NOV 17 ��;1� TOWN OF VAIL Creutinx oppnrnatities'and building Ictstbig relationsl�ips since 197F. �' • �ow�oFV� � FINAL REPORT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS Project: r'�I��t Vl�t t h ��.-��d'�G�� I-C�S��a�^cePermit Number: �14 � ��tc Project LocaUon: �)�l�� T� "J� �O��S� �.p c,.o�- , �c.', � Owner 1 �f C�°7'T 1��Ql`1 c�Je l�P �� µJ�e�� , l�l^� Address ��2� ��/�^013� I�AJ�.Su�� Liry:�e�.GeSC�.G Zip: ( Design Professional In Charge: ��c�- � �'c��G ' l+� �-:�c��c�. Address: �v Z� I`�� S� Ciry:��f��J Dc%C� s�(�5 State: w Zip: SS�� Phone:C!�C� �!�{� Z�a b Fax: �7l� ��5 ��S� E-mai�: _ Q v e �_ �.D C.�' E C7�'C C_� . C_' c� w� � To the best of my information,knowledge,and belief,the special inspections and/or testing required for this project,have been completed in accordance with the contract documents. Interim reports submitted prior to ihis Final Report of Special Inspections form a basis for,and are to be considered an integral part of fhis final report. Any discrepancies that were noted in all interim repo�ts have been corrected. ��11S�t��i//i��' `�,� 'o��.o....�,�'�'SB Prepared by: VO`rgyt}�-}�j��C�4� V lC�- � `- �V�1/\ ,C�$ �. � e or P' Name 'fl; �j!� ' °Jf'�� C�(j/�� -�CfY � P��l°•I 47G�� fr�l�� i i nature �� ':"ayr`' '�j�i I�p�� y'4 c 1- 1 �—1!� � ��s��$� Date Preparer's Seal and Signature Required —12— �� I i ,�,�-r�i I �u�le F t� ��thn�c.,l, lr.r �'(� �ii 4 al 1�-� ��r/►��/►i i �,I��,t,� �.1`F��n t ,!_��.i��1r��,�I I�i�,,,ne a,�.�.,.},,,e��.,;, HEPWORTH-PAWI.AK GEOTECHNICAL � „- , , Fa.: ;r:.'-�;.;:};:} t°n'ia�`�il: k��E;;e�,i1:��1r�t�-tl�.�,�in November 16, 2011 Farest Road Development, LLC Attn: Mike Foster 8120 Woodinont Ave., Suite 800 Bethesda, Maiyland 20814 (mikcC(«�!trilE_t��E�lid��,_�c�n�) Job No. 109 428B Subject: Sum��iary of Engineering and Construction Observation and Material Testing Services, Mountain Retreat Residence, Lot 3, Block 2, Vail Village 3`� Filing, 395 and 405 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado Dear Mike: As requested by Dai7�y1 Lundholm, we are providing a summary of engineering and construction observation and materials testing services Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical performed for the subject project. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical previously conducted a subsurface study for design of foundations at the site aiid pcesenteci our findings in a re�ort dated January 20, 2010. We also provided recomrnendations for the building unclerdrain design in a report dated June 1 l, 2010. We observed the faundation excavation for the building and submitted our findings in a letter dated August 12, 201 l. The spread footing bearing coilditions were fouii�l lu bc suilable for support of the design bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. Groundwater encountered u� the excavation was adequately controlled by the temporacy dewatering and permanent underdraui systems. The building construction was begun in August 2010 and is essentially complete at this time. During tl�e construction we perfonned part-time testing of concrete and soils backtill compaction. Concrete for the building footings and foundation �valls was tcsted to meet the minimum 28 day specified strength of 4,000 psi. Comp3clion testing was performed on exterior and interior foundation wall backfill, and backfill below the driveway, auto-court and patio slabs/hot tub areas. The compaction testing indicated the backfill was compacted to a minimum 95% standard Proctor density as specified. , , �., , , , _ , , , . _ , _ ; , =r � , , _ ��,3i�.� , , �-r; � � � � � , �„�.� � � ��3�iu_� , ��.r,; , ,-,,`�� i , , i�,� �,,ii.,, ��,,,, �r��. �.,..�i Forest Road Development, LLC November 16, 2011 Page 2 We also provided design details for uicreasing the driveway boulder retaining wall height from 1'/z to 2 feet in a letter dated October 13, 2011. The walt geo-grid and backfill were observed to be constructed as per our design detail. Our reports engineering reports, letters and construction daily reports have been previously provided under our Job Nos. 109 428A and 109 428B. If you have any questions or iieed further assistance, please call our office. S iucerely, HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHMCAL, [NC. �v�eoe�aeiao�s s��,aq .•• R d J'�� r �. s � i��o �G°s" Q e d� — ; '�' • David A. Young, P.�.,�: �; ,;; a � � °r -c�I� t � °s��.��;: l(-/�,.�1�,.��-`ar'��r,,,e DAY/ks�v �/ �•�"�a��M� /'i1,`� ��f,s��a,`� cc: R. A. Nelson& Associates— Dai�►yl Lundholm(�ilu��dl�olm t�ran�Ison.cUm) Job vo. 109 428B G@HOtGC�'1 a � �� SE�CIAL INSPECTIbN!Arft1 rEST1AtG 3CHEDULE (IBC 1704} '^ r� 1 PraJ�lNarr�: �•� Ib+�..� �Psg. PermN� 'f�Z� '•' �v�`Owners Namec ✓Y� JK ��6_�� Testing��e�flan Pnn�rama aai, Agency. Testing It�speeti�an s�p�wurs wim�ne oeie Nereby c�rtifxa thai the T�llnspe[iton A�enqr nemed aba►e has been angaged to perierm s6�uctwai tes�ae� tnapedFans durir►g constrt�cdon as cfbdced babw,b aetisfy aG appHcebte po�tlons of�e Bwid'r�g Cade. Frfor Oo final iqspection,the Inspedlan Ag�ncy ah�f subrt�i a slaten�e�that aQ�tema of daignated work perFamed were teported. My items checked but no1 tesled or Inspec�ed�a�@ be nohd ar�expi��ad. Whsnever��Eed tkms on tne llat are�dy for ser�ltng.testing,or Fnspsctlon, �sne��oe u►e res�onamt�ay a tne aomrecra to y�e timefy nofice to the InspecQnn agency so fhni tt�a requlred senRces may be perFom�ed. ttEAVPORC�uo s7E� UkDF�tPINN�IG: Tensb�6end�o�sat Fer heat per�lon� _ Tanpo nt InsPecton aE PfaeemeM _., in a/Stasl Fab�icatbn � tnspsclion oF Wvldlrn� .._.,.. oti of Rektorei�3 F�n �� y of Conu+et�Pleeertnet ' of liebaCk9 NlASONRY: _ Prafm. Tebls(Mesonrp U�Hs.Wa�Pdon19) _ SOtL MA0.S: � Subo TaHs(MorGu,GnDUk FleM Wai Prtsnx} .• T�P�Y�n9 ,�., Ine n o!Placemnntand Grou�g Prnnanent Wr9 COl�lCRETE SHQTCRETE GROUTANDINQRT/1[� `�'��11�T1JRALSI'��.: cmr.cle si,ot crau eewhr � Sart+ple a 7est N membere babwl a e taaw deslpn „_ Shop kie�d ' 6 Wel�ng lnspedion �oTa9areaal�. _ 8hop UI a in6peclton a .�� P Y r�st Ponm � �� `ding InapeClioq g��,�yU� _ Bol6ng fnspec6on cament Gr�b Id Ul�asanl�lospedeon �P►� —` �a��+y Compre�lon Tab .— Metal Uedt Weldiig IrtspaClion Coslspedmans F�� , Pick-uP Sam et bIl d�PEacame�t 9hrinkt9e Bars Yeld Cfwck Sa� AirChect Aompqtps T DiYUnkW _ 6Aotslura DelemUnalTon PRECAST CO ET : r'` ��{ � • _ Reinfordny T ' p� ! Inspectlon o( ' ' P�canfent p Found:tion _ Te�Idon T � Iqs ' ofTertdonPbcemettt S'IR(fCTURAtyyppp; � on of Conu�te plaament � � � hi o[Coc�cre�e BatChln _ eI Nanvl AltadttnerK dc Insdts -�` &Teat Compaten brldiMp� Compression Tesfs ecti�n of Gw L,am FibrPcatlon laspection W Shrsa(r�plfrmsfet � SMOKE CONTROL: PIUNG,CA(SSOI�S CAPS,71FS: _ �isPect( Of REhfarc.l�lg Plarsment SPEG1lL CASES: � Iqsp n afi Concreta P6aosmant "' ,�, In aetlon of Concrete 66tChtng SPECIAL 1l1S N: ,_, S o Resistnnce SF6dlyotlbrbst;�tionsorspecfa(frtsk�naroqeved. ndRequlremenis �� . � � G; ,�� ! �I � . �ov 1� �u�`� � TOWN OF VAIL � Job N�ne_�lfllz�79�i��ie.� �S_ � Job Atidtess: �r��r�.e� e�. ��P Petmit Pto.:_.�(i{O'�Q?f 7�_, SPECIAL lNSPEC7YOIV ANA 7EST7NG AGREEM�Id'f' {7o appifcants ot projecQs requAing SpQaiat InspscNon or Testing per Sectlan 4704 of tho 18C) The owner or his/her reprn.sentative,on fhe advice of iFte desfgn ptofessianaJ In re�IS�Ie cherge,ehalt complete, seat, sign and sUbmit a capy af the �eda1 Inspeciion Agreement �d Struclural T�ts Scheduled to the Tawn of Va►7 for rertew and approval_ Stgrratures are reqaKed on bdh pages; phofc�opied or taxed signatures are acceptable. The owner and hirJher general oor�tract�r, wilere applic�{e, shall a�so aoknowledge fhe ficllowing canditions appkcabte ta Special ir►s�ectron 7esting: 1. Coniractor is tesponsibk fcr proper no'Gfocation to the �nspeqioc� or Testing agency for iEems listed.(t�age 1) (f8C'i704} 2. Onfy the testfng taboratory stroutd lake sarr�les ary8 tra�p�c�them to thefr laboratary. 3. Coples of alI laboratnry reporks and inspedians are ta be sent directty to the Town of Vaet by the 7esting agency on a weeldy basis. 4. lnspec�ion ager�cy(o submit narnes and quaf�icaffor�s of on-s��e spr.c{al�spectars to the Tawn of Vaii for revicnr and approval.(Page 2} 5. The speciai inspector is responsibie to immediately noliry the Town of Vai1 Buifdirtig�tf�ciai in writing of any conoerns ar�dia probiems encauniered 6. R is fhe respnnslb�ty af the�conttack� � review the T4wn af Vai1 approved pla�s €or additfonal lnspectian or testing requirements fhaf may be noted. A pre-ooc�structlon conference at the job site is recammended ta review speaal lnspection procedures. 7. The speciai inspeciar shatl use anty the Tov�m af�Jai�approved drawings. 8. AI! specfal fnspeetbn f�etd reparts musE be left on site for�v by the Town af Vait Staff prtor to �u'�ed inspections or ra-lnspec�orts. BEFORE OGCUPAl�lCCY Witl BE GRAN7ED: Tt�e specia! lnspec&on agency shall submit a sigrted snd se.etad statemeM th�f aq ttems requiring testlrg and inspection were futfilled and reporfed. Those ttems rrot tested arxltor ir�pected shaA be nated 3n iilis statement A capy of the siatement siiaf!be mafrrtained at the job site for the B�ril�ng lnspea{or's view prior to final inspecti�n. ACknrnvtedge Owner. (� � �/�/� � �� g uro �� P�intNaMe Datc �ep�s1�speotbn �( A�encY: c G J�CY � t�u S-��!� Slgitature Prini Name te p��« �` �i�e ArcfdEng: � na Pr.qt Na Date Contract�: ` ��. �i�� ,��1!C�LI Stgnat . PrtnF N�me Dato c -3- D, _�', G� L!� LJ �J � ` NOV 1 E� :�:��1 � � TOWN OF VAIL :� �. �, ._7 , "" _ . p �'., ": � � .4 Y . � � . �"S , nC 3^��{*,:.,:''3 ,,,:. x :. � . ; g "; x� :�, �cX > : X:.. i �m�; �",:. �� `�� .�� -" �> .� : .. �� .a ° ; g" � ` r ` j �` Department of Communrty.=:Developme�nt�; �� '� ,�`.� � � �� ,, ,;. , , �;�r�- § y .� � A- 75 South Frontage fto�d ",�' r - a .'�, F* �F�;'.�s �::.��_ ; �k ,r:+. _., �'. :.aS.� �,� :z � � , �� , Va�i,-•C�1ora � �� .�. ��' ':��,, w � �; � �� , _� '�.�, y ��-�e'I�;9��;� �' �, _� �r.�,� �.FN � ,:� � � � p�� f. *--s v . r 1 �t:: t s .._ _.�� "a � �� - . , LL� � � �• �) _ .. . �' .g+: . �°�'" � , �r° . . _ . _, `�, �. . .� l �!: _ �ry . �� ,:i,� ,e . , > � + �ii � .- ,. . D.e��lop��," e� z�, �'.. ,�; .� . .� -, , _ .,�,'�„� .. �� _.trQ°- �.,�de�S��. ��.��,,.�� ... ��p��- 4: TRANSMITTAL FORM Revision Submittals: 1. "Field Set"of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved 8�the permit is re-issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55.00 per hour(2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. `Permit#(s)information applies to: � Attention: ( Revisions � � r,� ( ) Response to�Correction Letter � j ��~��S WEV Ifl-�00� _� L_�,�.11� , attached copy of correction letter � ; ( ) Deferred Submittal � � ( )Other � � 3 I Project Street Address: �µ � � �s��'J' �D Q.�_j' � Description/List of Changes: � j(Number) (Street) (Suite#) � N E,E.+ti' �l.� � e � 'Building/Complex Name: �q � ; 1 I F : � N��6S r� �uLa� �� ,�� €Contact Information: —° � 'Company: TRIU.f�1PN �EV4LCPAlEsw�T ��L�� e Tti TI�E SjbvC� ' � (�� ' �Company Address: 7� Lt�l LLOl�1 iC.� UNI T aDS � w�un►�s A�.c»� �¢.�Jec��tY. ' 4 � r� ; ; n � I � . ;City: v��!� State: W Zip: ' I � � ;Contact Name: $ � i ° j Contad Phone: 3O3+y75`�y� � � � �. ' ' � ; j E-Mail ; � � � l � � 1 E Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations(Labor 8�Materials) � � �(DO NOT include original valuation) ; F j f 3 � ; i . � i r Building: $ �] 38�,00 _ '(use additional sheet if necessary) ; , �_. -..._.._._._..._.................._............._..-----_�--------_..._......... .....__..........._....._._.__........_._........_........�...._..... ; � f j Plumbing: $ � ; €Date Received: ±Electncal: $ . � D � � � � � � :Mechanical: $ � £ SEP 2 7 2011 ;Total: $ '�, 3 85. Do � ;-- -- ---_--- - ---_-.-- ! TO W N O F VA I L �i'�'��' ___ O1-Jan-10 NOTE: TH/S PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES .� TOWN OF VA(I, ' Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road,Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.4792139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 NEW (SFR,P/S,DUP) PERMIT Permit #: B10-0078 Project #: PRJ10-0009 Job Address: 395 FOREST RD VAIL Status. . : ISSUED Location......: 395&405 Forest Rd Applied . . : 04/23/2010 Parcel No....: 210107113019 Issued. .. : O6/21/2011 Expires. ..: 11l30/2010 OWNER FOREST ROAD DEVELOPMENT LLC 04/23/2010 IN CARE OF NAME TRIUMP DEVELOPMENT 8120 WOODMONT AVE STE 800 BETHESDA MD 20814 APPLICANT R.A. NELSON&ASSOCIATES, IN 04/23/2010 Phone:970-949-5152 PO DRAWER 5400 AVON Colorado 81620 License: 170-A CONTRACTOR R.A. NELSON&ASSOCIATES, IN 04/23/2010 Phone: 970-949-5152 PO DRAWER 5400 AVON Colorado 81620 License: 170-A Darryl Lundholm 471-2893 Description: NEW TWO-FAMILY DWELLING(I NCLUDING DEMOLITION OF EXfSTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME) Occupancy Type Factor Sq Feet Valuation Totals... 11,771 $3,630,000.00' Number of Dwelling Units: Occupancy: IRC Town of Vail Adjusted Valuation: $3,630,000.00 Type Construction: IRC Total Sq Ft Added: 11771 .....................................................<.,.<.�.....«...«.,,........ FEE SUMMARY ....,.,.,,................,.,..,,,.........,,,..............,.....,.,......,.... Building Permit Fee------> $15,208.25 Will Call---------------------------> $5.00 Total Calculated Fees-------------> $99,814.26 Plan Check--------------------> $9,885.36 Use Tax Fee---------------------> $72,400.00 Additional Fees-----------------------> $0.00 Add'I Plan Check Hours-> $550.00 Restuarant Plan Review---> $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES-------------> Investi ation-----------------> $99,814.26 g $0.00 Recreation Fee----------------> $1,765.65 Payments------------------------------> $99,814.26 Total Calculated Fees------> $99,814.26 BALANCE DUE-----------------------> $0.00 .,...,,.,,,..,......�..,,....,«.............,,,,,,...,,.,,......,,...........,,.,,.....,.......,,....._........,,_,,......,...,.......,..,........«..,..,.,,...«...........,,>.............,.,.... DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,and state that all the informatior as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws,and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes,design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL E MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:OOAM-4:L � �� , � �u%� �,��y �� Signature of Ow er or Contractor Date Print Name new_co nstruction_perm it_041908 wwk�f#f��#RRf�Rk�#x*tf�flkff�xwwwfkR�f�Mwwffwlf#�kRXktwww�Rxfffwwkw#wf�f�#*ffwwNwffR�*!�*fffw�#f�lRxNfwwwwl�flf#wwwYkf��#��*wwwkww+N�!!!!**www�fA��f�f�Mewww/fff�#/��t/�xx�+w�www APPROVALS Permit#: B10-0078 as of 06-21-2011 Status: ISSUED •Yrwtrw#�k444rt�Rkhtrrt�kf fi�.lfwirAir�k�,FrtNrtl1(x'k+F+�k��fffrwewyrfrrtilki(4##x'k�4Rkililirff x�hRrtetrh�k�krtRf!*w+t+t:Ftr�kwrt�ktrirrtf t/tMw+4ilf f f#�RNYrf M'#>fkiF f xw tr#YYrYe�kkff Rf xt<yr�.Ff#rtt(44f1(xw*wrt eYeR�rt��4kt+tYrtf#�.FYr�.F�.l�##�1`+�ketrwtrN�k#'� Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 05/10/2010 cg Action: CR see laserfische project folder 05/26/2010 cg Action: AP Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 04/30/2010 bgibson Action: AP plans routed to C-3 11/15/2010 bgibson Action: AP 11/10/10 revision approved by planning. plans routed to Martin. 06/17/2011 bgibson Action: AP 6/16/11 GRFA crawlspace revisions approved. Plans routed to D-2. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 05/14/2010 mvaughan Action: COND Fire sprinkler system and monitored fire alarm system required. provide manufacture data and specs/details on outside gas fire pits. Exterior shutoffs required. No information provided showing separate water mains for fire suppression system. Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 04/28/2010 cs Action: DN 1. Coordinate with the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District regarding landscaping and stairs in the vicinity of the sanitary sewer main along the west property line. 2. Proposed tree, columns and gas lights (not shown on DRB set) are required to be setback 10' from edge of road per Town Code. 3. Sheet C1 does not match sheet A1.0, coordinate site/grading plans. C1 shows a single wall along the south side of the dwy, A1.0 shows a combination wall. 4. All retaining walls shall be a min of 2' from property line. 5. A separate zone is required for the snowmelt located within the right-of-way. 6. A revocable permit is required for all private improvements located in the right-of-way. 7. Proposed phone and tv service lines are shown on adjacent property. Provide copy of agreement with adjacent property owner for the encroachment or relocate to project's property. 06/02/2010 cs Action: COND snowmelt located within the ROW shall be on a separate zone Item: 05101 BUILDING DEPT REVISION 11/13/2010 Martin Action: AP Revision to retaining wall. 12/14/2010 martin Action: AP Revisions to sheets S2.1 and S3.0 04/04/2011 Martin Action: CR Revision#3 Provide revisions on the appropriate structral plan sheets as previuosly approved. 04/18/2011 JRM Action: AP APPROVED REVISIONS 3,4,5 06/21/2011 JRM Action: AP APPROVED REVISION TO GRFA DATED JUNE 15TH new_con struct ion_perm it_041908 �.............�.....,,..,.,.�............,....,,>.,,,......,,,.,...,...,...�...,,...,,,.,......................<.....,,.....,..,,.....,.......,,...,....,,,..,.,,..................,... See the Conditions section of this Document for any that may apply. n ew_co n st ru ct i o n_pe rm it_041908 ...................................................................................................................,,..�.....,.,,,.....>,x..,.........,,............,....,.,....,...., CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit#: B10-0078 as of 06-21-2011 Status: ISSUED ........�..<........>.................»..,>,.,,.....,,,.,......,......�.....,.........,>.....,,,.........,...,...,......,...,..>.......,.......,.,....,.........,..............,.... Cond: 33 (PLAN) THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRED A SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY. SUCH SURVEY SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO REQUEST FOR A FRAME INSPECTION. Entry: 05/14/2010 By: mvaughan Action: COND provide information regarding outdoor fire pits. Manufacture cut sheets and construction of pit shall be detailed. Provide information regarding size of fire mains for suppression systems. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 42 (BLDG 2009) CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED PER 2009 IRC R315 Cond: CON0011698 Revised structural sheet to be r(povided without pastey seal new_co nstruction_perm it_041908 *++*********************************************+************�****************************** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement **********************+****************************************�**************************** Statement Number: R110000683 Amount: $110.00 06/21/201110:20 AM Payment Method: Check Init: SAB Notation: 188760 - RA NELSON ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B10-0078 Type: NEW (SFR, P/S,DUP) PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-1301-9 Site Address: 395 FOREST RD VAIL Location: 395 & 405 Forest Rd Total Fees: $99, 814 .26 This Payment: $110.00 Total ALL Pmts: $99,814.26 Balance: $0. 00 **************************************************�***************************************** ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------------- ------------------------------ ------------ PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 110.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- _ _ �� _.. _ _, ..:: .: _.. , :.:_ .,: . ,,..: ..., .�_ ,. , ;: _:_ -... . . _, ,_: - - _ .: ;.:: ,._ -._ - ,: : _ , - , ,.. � �., _ _ . � , t � Departm�n�of,CarrttY.iun�iy:Developmen� _ , „ 3 = � .: .. :;" ' - _ - � �. M. � t - - y� - 7� Sflufh Fron�ag E2a d �� r �� }� �` � � Va�l, �q1or� oe��6�� , �� ; �� 3;�, _ r , ,�, , ., � _ .� . ,. , = `� F .:�- � �,� .-, � . . , _ , � �9��'�-,�.�,�,,',2-�" :.� � _ _ , �- � „ J ... „� z+.:� _ � _ , � . +„� �� . _ �:�. , . ., ,�y � . - , � - " .-,�...... .;,_ ..;^ ..�; ., . . _ �. �� <� ��,� `-�, � � �..�'��-�� F �� r h � tN�b '��a��.�-'�� < ��--.-.: _- _ �; . �� . ,�:� �-��'�-'y'' +- ' "�`` ` s�. 1 _ r � D�ve.lo�i�ten�r .�--�,�-�� , � �p�,�.-� �� ,.�'a:�a - �,�z...y^ . ,. - -� '�-a Y"�.�'��`^�.-`�c.'�-,w._�`�, � C x .� ��y �-� �x-s.�r.r '_�.�L�'�i - �� -�n=+.�^�+�x�'"'�'�'+"'��e�s�� _ . ,. '- TRANSMlTTAL FORM ' Revision Submiitals: ' �. "F9eld SeY' of approved plans MUST accompany revisions_ 2_ No further inspections wlii be performed until the revisions are approved&the permit is re-issued• �i' 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55.�0 per hour(2 hour minimum),and are due upon issuance. ; � Permit#(s)infarmation appfies to: Atfention_ ( Rev9sions �'' ( ) Respanse to Correction L�eiter � �';`] _�•1��.�j aftached copy of correction (etEer : i V v ' ( ) Deferred Submittai , ( } Ofher ; � Project Street Address: a '� i ;�n J �� l�S�- �� z Description/List of Changes: I V C� 5. �(Number) (Street) (Suits#) C- ��i'��7� j �� `-';1�.�.� i k � Bui(ding/Complex Name: ��l�I�1�� -�/Z��Q� ��-� ? ; € � � ,..�.�..�.�....�.._....�. --°----_..�.� ''Contact Information: : '. Company: I\ �; f71�.�r--u�f'� °�,,Q�J dL°� ��L.. : y € �Company Address: �:�, ��/��/1�� /�/ ^ � E i City: �V�� State_ �-�� Zip: 0� ��r � '� Contact name: �,��t V�- T �� C,(�"��'�7r-�� I �Contact Phone= `7 r'� � �� I E-Mail 4/l lL�I�C� �101,(!Yl F''�'(1��t?�sL'�� • !~,7✓V' , � ...................�..,,_..._.- —- --�� --- - ._...._....,._ E i ; � Revised ADDITIONAL Va(uafions(Labor 8�Materia[s) € (DO NOT include original valuafion} = i i I Building: y_ - �� i(nse addifional sheet rt necessary) ' ; f------ - - -.._._._.___._._...-----_._ .._._._..._..---.._....._... ': Plumbing: � � �� a Date Received: Electncal: $ � � � � � nr] (� � � � ��J � j MechanicaL ` ` JUN 1� z�� ; !Tetai: � � � i i TOWI� OF VAIL I NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES .� �ow�o�v�, � Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road,Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f.970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 NEW (SFR,P/S,DUP) PERMIT Permit #: B10-0078 Project #: PRJ10-0009 Job Address: 395 FOREST RD VAIL Status. . : ISSUED Location......: 395&405 Forest Rd Applied . . : 04/23/2010 Parcel No....: 210107113019 Issued. .. : 04/19/2011 Expires. ..: 11/30/2010 OWNER FOREST ROAD DEVELOPMENT LLC 04/23/2010 IN CARE OF NAME TRIUMP DEVELOPMENT 8120 WOODMONT AVE STE 800 BETHESDA MD 20814 APPLICANT R.A. NELSON&ASSOCIATES, IN 04/23/2010 Phone: 970-949-5152 PO DRAWER 5400 AVON Colorado 81620 License: 170-A CONTRACTOR R.A. NELSON&ASSOCIATES, IN 04/23/2010 Phone: 970-949-5152 PO DRAWER 5400 AVON Colorado 81620 License: 170-A Darryl Lundholm 471-2893 Description: NEW TWO-FAMILY DWELLING(I NCLUDING DEMOLITION OF EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME) Occupancy Type Factor Sq Feet Valuation Totals... 11,771 $3,630,000.00' Number of Dwelling Units: Occupancy: IRC Town of Vail Adjusted Valuation: $3,630,000.00 Type Construction: IRC Total Sq Ft Added: 11771 ,............,..................................................................... FEE SUMMARY ..........,..,,........................,......,.,...,........,................. Building Permit Fee------> $15,208.25 Will Call---------------------------> $5.00 Total Calculated Fees-------------> $99,704.26 Plan Check--------------------> $9,885.36 Use Tax Fee---------------------> $72,400.00 Additional Fees-----------------------> $0.00 Add'I Plan Check Hours-> $440.00 Restuarant Plan Review---> $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES-------------> $99,704.26 Investigation-----------------> $0.00 Recreation Fee----------------> $1,765.65 Payments------------------------------> $99,704.26 Total Calculated Fees------> $99,704.26 BALANCE DUE-----------------------> $0.00 ....................,..,,,........<,...,........,........,,.._..................,..........,,,...........................«............»..........,.........,....,.........,...........«... DECL.ARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,and state that all the informatior as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws,and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes,design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHAL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM-4:00l,P�M. 't..�'�� Signature of ner or Contracto Date Print Name n ew_con stru ction_perm it_041908 •fx�fxf}Rx+fkwwWwk+www#fww#wwww�wwYfwf�l��#k#ff�f��R��f#f#fRf�ffff�lf�*�1k��Mk��1fR#��fifff�wfk�kxwww�wfixxRww�wtf}<R��xxxRx�+tfff��l�Rf*#**f�f�*�*f�fxN�lflwww�+wYwMwwffwww++ APPROVALS Permit#: 610-0078 as of 04-19-2011 Status: ISSUED ...............................................................................................................x,....,...............,....,...........,,....,,...,................... Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 05/10/2010 cg Action: CR see laserfische project folder 05/26/2010 cg Action: AP Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 04/30/2010 bgibson Action: AP plans routed to C-3 11/15/2010 bgibson Action: AP 11/10/10 revision approved by planning. plans routed to Martin. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 05/14/2010 mvaughan Action: COND Fire sprinkler system and monitored fire alarm system required. provide manufacture data and specs/details on outside gas fire pits. Exterior shutoffs required. No information provided showing separate water mains for fire suppression system. Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 04/28/2010 cs Action: DN 1. Coordinate with the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District regarding landscaping and stairs in the vicinity of the sanitary sewer main along the west property line. 2. Proposed tree, columns and gas lights (not shown on DRB set) are required to be setback 10'from edge of road per Town Code. 3. Sheet C1 does not match sheet A1.0, coordinate site/grading plans. C1 shows a single wall along the south side of the dwy, A1.0 shows a combination wall. 4. All retaining walls shall be a min of 2' from property line. 5. A separate zone is required for the snowmelt located within the right-of-way. 6. A revocable permit is required for all private improvements located in the right-of-way. 7. Proposed phone and tv service lines are shown on adjacent property. Provide copy of agreement with adjacent property owner for the encroachment or relocate to projecYs property. 06/02/2010 cs Action: COND snowmelt located within the ROW shall be on a separate zone Item: 05101 BUILDING DEPT REVISION 11/13/2010 Martin Action: AP Revision to retaining wall. 12/14/2010 martin Action: AP Revisions to sheets S2.1 and S3.0 04/04/2011 Martin Action: CR Revision#3 Provide revisions on the appropriate structral plan sheets as previuosly approved. 04/18/2011 JRM Action: AP APPROVED REVISIONS 3,4,5 <................>....,.......�...,.....,,,......................,,,.,...,,..,.....................,...�x.,.....,,...,,.........�,�...,,.�,,....,...,...........,,�,,.....,�....,.,.. See the Conditions section of this Document for any that may apply. new_con stru ction_pe rm it_041908 ,...<.......................................................................................................x...,,...........,,...,.,,,..,..........,...,..,..................,...... CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit#: 610-0078 as of 04-19-2011 Status: ISSUED ....,x................�...,,....,,.......,...........,,,,......�,,,............,..,,............,.,,...............,,..,,..,,,...,.........,....,.....,....�......,..,,...,..,.,..,..... Cond: 33 (PLAN) THIS PROJECT WI LL REQUIRED A SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY. SUCH SURVEY SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO REQUEST FOR A FRAME INSPECTION. Entry: 05/14/2010 By: mvaughan Action: COND provide information regarding outdoor fire pits. Manufacture cut sheets and construction of pit shall be detailed. Provide information regarding size of fire mains for suppression systems. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 42 (BLDG 2009) CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED PER 2009 IRC R315 Cond: CON0011698 Revised structural sheet to be r[povided without pastey seal n ew_co n st ru ct i o n_pe rm it_041908 *****+++*******�*******++******************************************************�************ TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement ******�*******+***********************+++****+*+***********+*++******++*+****+*+*+*********+ Statement Number: R110000319 Amount: $331. 00 04/19/201110:47 AM Payment Method: Check Init: LC Notation: #187909 / R. A. NELSON & ASSOC ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B10-0078 Type: NEW (SFR, P/S,DUP) PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-1301-9 Site Address: 395 FOREST RD VAIL Location: 395 & 405 Forest Rd Total Fees: $99,704.26 This Payment: $331.00 Total ALL Pmts: $99, 704 .26 Balance: $0.00 ************************************************�**********++******************************* ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------------- ------------------------------ ------------ PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 330.00 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- � �� „ + �` �s r� c .R '� �.x ; a '� :�£ :^=c -� _ .� � -3� ;� � ° = t� y ` Department of:Cornmunity`Developmen�Y` r e� � � � � � '� 75 South Frontage E�oad > '_`Nt -s-4 1 . �� i., ; :��'-�, �. ';, � , � '� � , � , - , 1%a i l, �QJ o ra q ��fi.��`� � � �� - --�.-- , " �. .,r L ,f � '�-- ( � ;� � : .; >, n7(� {� --� � �� rF a �%� '� •X ✓ � e J/ U��3 ��'� ,��-`'XH. -` _ � . .... . �Y'� <r � �� . ` .� „ >; j ft . ; r ,.;s„, . �, a '��, ,�. R" ��JC�`��7,�� 3�;"�� . _ �� . �. . ; > . i,-y y ��-r 3 �i` .Y z'��. .� �, � � ,�� We}b v�v�t�,�e#1i�0�� .., v�� t.- ��F�ir � �.. � �:�,e .y J _ V _, � y,��. :� .w-�..�-� � �"-s� t. �' ;� Develo�menfsl�e�zevst��o�'t�-tr�i`o�� ;. -�� r,�: c --rtt �z .>n. �. tr _ ,,'��'y'S- �� ..s. y "�� sr '- f �`�-`�, ��..�.';� .�J i�t��,�� t� "'*. 3 s-' � - ��.'k ...F ,>. .+',,, �"% .,� .� •r� �.":L'�:- _�f� � _��.,___�._'`"^ �=��__- i; _�• . ,. _ t.__L��-u —�.^ - TRANSMITTAL FORM ��v�5ia � � Revision Submittals: 1. "Field SeY' of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved 8�the permit is re-issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55_00 per hour(2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. ;Permit#(s)information applies to: Attention: ( ) Revisions ' ' ( ) Response to-Correction Letter ` i j�� '- � �� _attached copy of correction letter ? i ( ) Deferred Submittal ' f � ( ) Other j � ; .� �_ . �Project Street Address: � I i ?Q �� .. t��1 S �'p)'� +`s�-' �o��'1 � Description/List of Changes: � _�� J i(Number) (Street) (Suite#) � ��vl..•� L ��'V `�V1�,511�1��/ H/�, ? [ �y� �t � � i Bui(dinglComplex Name: I��+�►�F � ; I I �� ' E ,._.j��sl��Cr � �Contact Information: � j ; _^ � ? iCompany_ �x�N A � ; G� p�q� � �L � ; ;Company Address: I• ' !yl'y�y�� J t� E } � € _ ;City:�j�� State: r� Zip: �l � ; ; i n �/ � � ;Contact Name: �1`R•y � ��N��L'�'� � � � �q3 � � ,Contact Phone: � f- � � • 'E-Mail c�I�rr� h�� ra��l��,�- �ow� � ' � 3 i i i �I �� ' ...�...- j � i 3 iRevised ADDITIONAL Valuations(Labor 8�Materials) � � �(DO NOT include original valuation) � � i ; ! r 'Building: $ � " �(use additional sheet if necessary) � ' --- --. _.._.._..-----_�__----- ---.._...__...: !Plumbing: $ � j �Date Received: � � � � �n � ±Electrical: $ f D U ! ` j Mechanical: $ ` ; � APR 12 2011 �Total: $ j ; ! T01�N OF VAIL ..` : z "�5" ,. ._ ,z' . �..kt' 'Z . �. � .#'� S .��,�,�"'�' .t :''��, . . '°rzs..k a� . .�... � a . k .. �-,�� . . if."'i r .� e` �e,i` `� ��'�7- i>: �� jY��5 � �'N^�.�r,��,�y�+. 'i'��^' �'.+�i'��'v-a�'^`^e.�ifar;�,�T''�y. ��.y'`r��.s.,,�. .yL 4-' >�.„.��}'�a.J,f ,�?. ` �... K . .,� M'".�`+.'+1.:-a s �h x ��•��,'�� c-s5'�,,,`-'�`"�.+<i�ei Y` ,r �"'�.x�c„iiJ�e � l s� � f ��Y .r + ,F *r:��l� '?.�'� .e i e*..`s�'r. ar`^,s.. �,'a,r�,'...,.r�.. � � .1 4�.�XT. N,�„�'�',,..+i��` �''Y+�<„�,�, �4 7,(y. �.4•.'fi�` � �.-n_"' ,�x�'-��+. �� . Ys.: � �-� ' h� � , jA '� � �� .��''" �epa�ie.r�fi of CQtn''rra.�n�fy,De elopmen� `;;�s��"!� " s. �'� . y��r�,�`�.+�J�'w.�.n.�3'�'h.. �"�` -„+K,��.��.�'4�'"'�-s-�r �a�t.v � /' . � a' , . „- .,_ . . Y ,��y . � � � < �- � � ly ��,;� �„�'��,�� .,Y ��'�+`��'� �,� r7�5 S:outh�Fro age ERoac�.�, �.;� .�...u. ,�5 e+t 7 .-t . �a ax Y'.v� �2 4�4 Y'• �i �x-�"'"T� ,.i,4. .y.- 'j'{j,'#F;L.: ;;�'"'"`. r'':,� �e„s.asr . t`a Xr `C.� ,�"� !e',� Y .. a' r'"i+.� �ti ri's'^a�-a 2` � � - - r•�,'� _: � � r s. {., Va� ��lo�r ,�x, � -iy r �, �� -r� rr'" � �0�:� :. .� .��l.,^,Y.ird�' � J .�,,,•.� y y _k b� �.u�'. � p �'r�.�i&�. � ,: y ;� � �` , `-� �� '��9� '�4 Y �i� .i �,;Y Si� r �1'.a ' ' 4 g ' °�+fi` ' , ' Tp„ic 5r j�Z ' �`. ' �� ....' 3�"" �, �.�xs� i 3 1�. . s.n,�` "a �' �..,,�+�. � '"�'.�. .fi�'ad�;,a' .>'s,Y �,�,� ..?�'� . :` a✓�; °C�: +G z _ �C' �y,.y��.� . i` d"+_~.. ��,i.;, .4's - 'tc :'`,�. ��.� �x!' _>a�:.:,, �.,a'. k.`:tfA,Fi. �"Y'� tF�P�:, {�. '1.. a - _ _*r" -s�.^., K• i�' .s Sc-^�YYlG1! ;�c <'•< � `�`�� = �y. 4 -- � , 'De�.�7ki��ienY�, ^ � �� .. �if �d .�. Ad' T.rr' _ _ �y, R _ �-��Y !�"�iC�'S -i .j�C+ � . � .. .. ...x �A� ,� _ --k+a^. - f.' TRANSMITTAL FORM Revision Submittals: 1. "Field SeY'of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections wili be performed until the revisions are approved&the permit is re-issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55.00 per hour(2 hour minimum),and are due upon issuance. ;Permit#(s)information applies to: Attention: ( ) R visions ' ; � n (v�i�esponse to•Correction etter � �V � �� _attached copy of corre tion f etter i ( ) Deferred Submittal ; i ( ) Other ' i � ;Project Street Address: � � Q _ OS �D��,� �. � Description!List of Changes: i� j �(t�umber) (Street) (Suite#) �« D �.VC- ��El�, ,�� i Bui(d^nglComplex Name: + Ld UN I�Q�{.� � G�- �� C�1 J ° E �E �12 D R�SIDL`IJC� i '` 2_ Z � Z, S 2, ' ' �Contact Information_ ' E Company: �� N�.I��D1�J�' S�OC.. 1�l� � S � .U � , 1 7 � n � : ;Company Address:�a, �Q��C Sy db 4 3 ; g : ;City: ��Ola State:�Zip: �'1 _ � _ i ; : �Contact Name: j�/aQ�.�l.. �111a,�,�pl,�_ .� 3 � ; � ;Contact Phone: ��, l.r��, ��4� � ' ; E-Mail ��V� hAL�I'1 l�ra��7. C.12�- � i � F � j i � , � � i � � 1 ;Revised ADDITIONAL Va(uafions(Labor 8�Materials) � ; i(DO NOT include original valuation) t '• � � i ; ' � ; ! Building: � �(use additional sheet if necessary) � ' -.-..--------.._-- -_....-------.._.___.i !Plumbing: $ -----�--. � j Date Received: � � � � � � ;Electrical: $ � p � � f ;Mechanical: $ i APR 0 7 201 `Total: $ � � I TQWN OF V IL ,... ._, .,� .. . - � ' � ''`- i � ' ' Departrnent of:Commun�#y�,Deyelopmen� ' ��'�°t �� ` " � '' L �,� 73 S�uth Frontage Road „ ��, � � � Vatl, Colorac�g 8�6,��`,� �� `� �.. � �;�� ° � �'�-' _ `�e7 -9�p��`��-� _ � � r � � .r : ,..� <-a...<.,� �.;� �� "r � = �"-� ,�.� �';: �,y',� � � ;. ,.� Faic�'�.4--��,,�'`°�� .s` ; �� _ `.` - n � .- � � � � : � � s� �� ti - � . _ � � t�IVeb, ��vY�.��lgt>�t� r: � k `" � �. _ "' =`� ��'��`��' � `� - � e.la�m n�#t�sevst �tr� ` � -�..E�a.a..,_.. e ��o t� �"`'ir�-�* �,��-- .� � =-"--e�� ' �' - r' -- b•r"-- � �.. d ��r x�,,i � � "�s#�F-��-f�- y��t'�� ,2� _ <�,r� �...r �� ll`b�t,. ��= ' �c`�' _ .' , E1/ . , , , .. . _ ___._ _--_ ,. . ,..� --' TRANSMlTTAL FORM ; Revision Submittals: i 1. "Field SeY' of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved&the permit is r�issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55.00 per hour(2 hour minimum),and are due upon issuance. ;Permit#(s)information applies to: Attention: (� Revisions ; �' 0 1 O Q�� O Response to�Correction etter attached copy of corre tion Ietter i ( ) Deferred Submittai ' ; ( } Ofher � ' � '�....� _� ....._.,.,._S �Project Street Address: ` � � �q��, �,y(� CJ. �Q�� . � Description/List of Changes= ` � ! �(Numbe� (Street) (Suite#) � �� Q)2 �� 4� J! �N J 1� j ` p J � � ;� e i Buifding/Complex Name��3,�' N ��ll i �y ��rR�W I � S�I��r�ka � j"i��.�� Ir �. .�. t�� s i�, �� _ �S PL�2 �- � C,-�� N ��/2 ' � � : ;Confact Information: ; 'Company_ �� k.E-- SQ� �`r qSS��i�-. �.{.�� ` � f � � � � �- ��A�,/�,�. S�e� � , : !Company Address: . ' 4 � r N € ;City: �� State:C-� Zip: �t�a� - �� /; �/ ,�1 ¢ ' ,Contact tVame: !.�l`)l��' 1 � ��N J I��.M f i � n ,� ! i ; ;Contad Phone: `1�Q. �� • ��3 � � ' E-Mail C'� I�11� h6�►� �. r�h'��'c'✓( ( ��✓�� i ; � � � � , � : i E , . �... �..��......�....... E ' _ � ..._..._.____. __ -__. � E I � 7 ' i � Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor�Materiafs) � ; �(DO NOT include original valuation) '• f 1 � � � 1 '. Building: � �(use additional sheet if necessary) � _.._.._..----._.._.___ ` _._....--------.-.-.-..; !Plumbing: $ �Date Received_ � � � � � i: E12ctncal: $ � D � ; ;Mechanical: $ � APR 0 5 ZO11 �Total: $ — �� -- � � ! � I TpWN O� VAIL I , _ _ ._ Darryl Lundholm From: Craig Carroll [CCarroll@monroe-newell.com] Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 3:47 PM To: Darryl Lundholm Cc: Mike Foster Subject: Forest Road Attachments: field report 3.3.11.pdf Darryl Here is our final framing report. 2 small items and a job well done. thanks Craig Carroll, P.E. Principal � Monroe & IVewell � ��ngn�n.��. —*�r— � � 1701 WynkoaQ Steet.Suitr?.#lp n,�,�«,aob�ao�a�a �' # Phone:30;-623�927 Fux;:;031�2.3�ib02 Wsb�itG www,momvc-ncwdtaom �` i Emai,denYe�'momoe-ncw�e[ttaom p � c� codc� APR 0 5 2011 TOWN OF VAIL 1 _. � ��_ � � �., • � � r v �# i � Monroe&Newell � Engineen.lnc ro Scruccural Enginerrs O VuI•[hnver•Prism �.}y N Dem�er Office �"3 1701 Wynkoop StreeL Suite 200.Dem�er.CU 80202 (303}623-4927 Phone(303j 623-6602 F� denver@,mon roe-newelLcom 3951405 Forest Road Duplex DnTE: March 3, 20l 1 JOB NUMBER: g I Z3 LOCATION: Vall, CO. WEATHER: C10Ud}r To: Triumph Development TEh1P:�O°AT 11:30� AM QPM ATTr�: Mike Foster REPOR-r av: Craig Carroll THE PI;�RPOSF OF TWtS SITE V1SIT WAS: � structural framing THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: 1. The meter roof is not yet installed. 2. Contractor shall add 2-2x6 wood studs to the column below the secondary garage support beam (3-1 l 7/8 LVL)at the existing 4-2x6 coluznn located in the middle of the mechanical room. 3. The secondary unit ridge support column located in the north stair wall (4-5 1/2" LVL)is spliced to 3-2x6 wood columns. Contractor shall add 2-2x6 wood columns to the lower pack and provide simpson strap to connect the 2 spliced sections together. No other exceptions noted �.��Colorado � ,�e..A Tne!++wx'ai^raMWC d M✓AKu n N N,1I1001'OC-DC W tII.0091 VaiL I�nver,and Frisco Offices � ' `' f � � ` ' Department,of Community Developmenfi"=: .Y�- �,� ".� -€ � K^`8' � 4 � � ,. -�� :� � � _'^� ; : -, 75 South Frontage Ro�d � � ,. � i , � . � ; .. - �t �'"��-� ,�� ; �. �:;;� �' ;� . "`> :� ,�°f�-R Va�l, �o�oradv 81��.� r �� :� F�- R s '�'�.`- ,.�� -�; ��?ei`,�97A-479 �1'L�,�, ��-� � �. _ � ., t�,�� "F��j��970�k��y24��_� r�" .� ��, `�� _�� .�' �We�: wv�v±r vafl�o�c�f�:a �. v-�,, - - - Deve�opmenf�R�irieli� ��at�#�� to � `; �'T:; _ ._�r1,i.�±1,'�}A�}L %� _ .. ;�� , ..-�.� 3 ..�. � ..a. ..: 't � y:� '� j '�.''r �` �'i�� } �� .� _.n�. °'`;�'� �� r:.� � .�e<_� ..�,>s.' TRANSMITTAL FORM Revision Submittals: 1. "Field Set"of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved 8�the permit is re-issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55.00 per hour(2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. ;�Permit#(s)information applies to:��~�� Attention:�� M� (►a-Revisions�� D „ ( ) Response to Correction Letter ' I �I 10� �� M�I R � �� attached copy of correction letter � ( ) Deferred Submittal ; E � � ( ) Other � I i � ,�....�..�.�..n.m...�.�._�.^,....,_.�,.µ.....w. _.�.�..,�._,,�.n...�..�,. .�.� �Project Street Address: � 3 C�S-��S �'Q��" l� � Description/List of Changes: , \ � (Number) (Street) (Suite#) �{�Q 1 t. S ) �,�e,�1��}�. � j Building/Complex Name: ,_� 1,�k��Y)�S� G�ARI F1 CT y(��S 3 � _v� i i �.�,..,�.�,.>w.,,�..,.,..,....,.,..,�,..,.. � Contact Infornmation: / � lCompany: K.'�, ��•c�� °E' 1�� flC, �_��.rs 5y.n, �y, � !a $EtS,J � I } ; �Company Address:P�. I.�l�q��z jt Sj-(�� { �City:�� State:�Zip: �' 1�� ; � ►�Af�2� � t�V�►��i�LN1 � ; �Contact Name. � ��o. �c��. a�a3 � �Contact Phone:__ � E-Mail � � � � � , ,�nc�l,�l,� � ran� sti�. c.e� � � � � ��.� � � �� Valuations(Labor&Material)) E � €Building: $ ( � � �Plumbing: $ �(use additional sheet if necessary) � _ _...._ __ ._._. _._._ _.__._._ .__......._--- __.. -- --------..-- ._...._... f � 'Electncal: �Date Received. Mechanical: $ i Total: � � � � C� L� OM [� i �_ __------__ ___ _ __ __3 MAR 2 4 2011 TOWN OF VAIL 1-Sep-09 , > � r�a� x '""�3�J`"'�'"x'�`" r^ a' sr��,. �v ��,+-a r r'^,� '. :,� :. c*^: a; ^r �+ ��'keg� ^z��*�k5°'�a�":�"4 a z �: .. .. . ;s .qa^ i. °i. J :� ., ,. ..� ...�� M?.F�t:+`r�? '^ e�+r'* �k !+y+A i^�, k 3�'' aFf 'b m§S°� 'iar$};kk f } YY � �. . . � �� u �Department,of�Community Devetapment�' �; ,�-� ,�, ; �: � T°5 �,� �� ° "�� _�� ` � a� South FroMtage c� s� �� .� e,: � :�°. �;&A. �,�� ''_ . �;;,., : ' �" ' . -V iJ�olat� ��.. � } �'�: � " �' � ��l'��9 _ � , _, . � _ , t , „ � .,��« r .ti. � : - ,��«� " i"- .�s `' .`� a� n � ';s{ �� .� ,. � ��, � ° . w � , ��' � s��' '� � i "ti� , ....: �. . � a.i. ' � �"��y -�� , - Q� en � � �� `� TRANSMITTAL FORM Revision Submittals: 1. "Field SeY'of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are appru�ed&the permit is re-issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55.00 per hour(2 hour minimum), and are due:apon issuance. Permit#(s)information applies to: Attention: (�evisions ( ) Response to Correction Letter l� 10 � 407� ��F�-r'��-! attached copy of correction letter ( ) Deferred Submittal ( )Other Project Street Address: , 3 �.� For�-L- s� � /� Description/List of Changes: (Nunaber) (Street) (Suite#) �rsL v GT�>rt,,ct- � �F T.�i� � S Building/Complex Name: FO�+- !� S� T F w�4-L L � �c c c �a�.i� � v-� C � tJ� � Contact information: Company: R,/�r N F�l�56�F f /-5�536C'�A-Tl� 5 � `�� f�"2G �f i T F G�[�2.4 t. Company Address: (��O_ �/��4-�-✓�- ��f-00 �/'v/�- [�l/f i�L Gt S /3 [� T 4�p / City: ,Q- c/G.�.� State:CO Zip:�/'�y�3 `��`-'� a°� 5"Tn �c�v�24 G-S Contact Name: M�rr� ��.��,��t,i s 6x..G '�°``^� A' C�'� �- � F `Gg i�°r''� Contact Phone: � �/>- ¢�7/- f��f-� T o T Y�r G.4 �.. 2 F i A��/�ui E-Mailr?CvTLE t�-Tq2�/L..4n�F t�5'o�/.CO�+-/; w/�- c-L TA�3LE ! O Sh/fd; S/.O Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations(Labor&Materials) (DO NOT inciude original valuation) Building: $ (use additional sheet if necessary) , Plumbing: $ Date Received: Electrical: $ Mechanical: $ Total: $ - O � D (S (� L � `l�-, � L�- �n ��f Nov � �� z��o TOWIV OF �/AIL oi-Ja„-io Project No. � 1'nter-Mountain 10-0003 = � ENG/NEER►NG Civil E»gine�rs 8a Surveyors Date: 10-1 1 -10 trc�nsmittc�l n er-v oun ain�gineering��. 40801 US Hwy b&24,Ste 203, Box 978 To: Darryl Lundholm Avon,Colorado 81620 R.A. Nelson PO Drawer 5400 970/949-5072 Avon, CO 81 620 Fax: 970/949-9339 Re: 395/405 Forest Road ��V t� _ QDD� PRSi � - o�o � Via: �l Pick up ❑ Fax 0 Fed Ex �► ❑ Delivery ❑ Mail ❑ Other `�R 4�b � �Oa O �3 �0 - 00�8 # of Copies Media Last Dated Legal Description 1 24x36 10-8-10 Foundation ILC l i ❑ As Requested � For Review/Comment ❑ Other Darryl, Please drop this off at the Town of Vail's development review cou and routed to Bill Gibson for review. D � � � � � Thanks, OCT 1 1 1010 xc: per: Bob Yost 1 � NOTE: TH/S PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES : �w�o�v� � Town of Vail,Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road,Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f.970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 NEW (SFR,P/S,DUP) PERMIT Permit #: B10-0078 Project #: PRJ10-0009 Job Address: 395 FOREST RD VAIL Status. . : ISSUED Location......: 395&405 Forest Rd Applied . . : 04/23/2010 Parcel No....: 210107113019 Issued... : O6/03/2010 Expires. ..: 11/30/2010 OWNER VICKERS FAMILY PTNSHP LLLP 04/23/2010 IN CARE OF NAME GREGORY VICKERS GP 2625 E FLORIDA AVE DENVER CO 80210 APPLICANT R.A. NELSON&ASSOCIATES, IN 04/23/2010 Phone:970-949-5152 PO DRAWER 5400 AVON Colorado 81620 License: 170-A CONTRACTOR R.A. NELSON&ASSOCIATES, IN 04/23/2010 Phone:970-949-5152 PO DRAWER 5400 AVON Colorado 81620 License: 170-A Description: NEW TWO-FAMILY DWELLING(INCLUDING DEMOLITION OF EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME) Occupancy Type Factor Sq Feet Valuation Totals... 11,771 $3,630,000.00' Number of Dweiling Units: Occupancy: IRC Town of Vail Adjusted Valuation: $3,630,000.00 Type Construction: IRC Total Sq Ft Added: 11771 •,,,_•••,••,•,,•••••,••,••••••,•,,,•,,•••,•••••••••••••••,••,•••_•,•,•,•,,•,,,••, FEE SUMMARY 1rRtfRttrtryYtYitY(%f�klr�4tleRlrf'RfVlrlrfRtfffrfRfrbYrfkRt44f�M0#��tt�f'fr4frf'RVVV1rVkYYrYiFY`Y'f4k##4 Buiiding Permit Fee-----> $15,208.25 Wili Call-------------------------> $4.00 Total Calculated Fees------------> $99,263.26 Plan Check-------------------> $9,885.36 Use Tax Fee------------------> $72,400.00 Additional Fees--------------------> $0.00 Add'I Plan Check Hours-> $0.00 Restuarant Plan Review---> $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES---.---___> 599,263.26 Investigation----------------> $0.00 Recreation Fee----------------> $1,765.65 Payments---------.---------------> 599,263.26 i Total Calculated Fees-----> $99,263.26 BALANCE DUE------------------a a0.00 �' fYf#ftY'Rf�/!ff#iNwKRRRxtltfH'frAY'rtY'fff�Itl#f##*4#itffffV!'fV1t�tRRYY'itftf�kfrfYty'YtftiF4fA041rt*ff41'4#flffftl�XfffiRYtikYty'rt'kkfrR�41rif1rR41'1'Z1r��RffrFilrfriRy'fr'4y'rtYr�1"R'k*fil4k4fr4f`l4Rf111VtiR�rrtiRYrfitNYrYYTWiFf##ff/# DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out in fulf the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws,and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision code esign review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FO TI SHALL BE ENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM-4:00 . 3 � � Sign ure O er or C tractor Date �l��s�t�' Print Name new construction_permit_041908 ��x*irwrr��r.�x��r+t�:�r��e��s.x�w��+x+x�r:ew��r�+�:::rrwxw��x�rxwwx+��:�w�.x�wwr�r�+xwx+t��er��wx�:x�w��x��xx�wetrr:�x��w�xrx��+::��x:rwxw+kxx��::::��wwtxi++x�x�x�we�rt� APPROVALS Permit#: 610-0078 as of 06-03-2010 Status: ISSUED +rr�+x��x�.rxwe�r,r,r�art�.rr,rwvrx��wrrrrr�ww+wawrxxvrrw,rtt+:wwx��xxx�ww�w�,r��w►rr,r�,e+�x��w�wtiwewv.wn�wr�x�wr�xxk�w:wxrrw��s.w:�wwt:w��ww+ixwiix�e�wxr,H.wxxyrrrt,r,r+�x�:::ir»avtxx:��sm� Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 05/10/2010 cg Action: CR see laserfische project folder 05/26/2010 cg Action: AP Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 04/30/2010 bgibson Action: AP plans routed to C-3 Item; 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 05/14/2010 mvaughan Action: COND Fire sprinkler system and monitored fire alarm system required. provide manufacture data and specs/details on outside gas fire pits. Exterior shutoffs required. No information provided showing separate water mains for fire suppression system. Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 04/28/2010 cs Action: DN 1. Coordinate with the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District regarding landscaping and stairs in the vicinity of the sanitary sewer main along the west property line. 2. Proposed tree, columns and gas lights (not shown on DRB set) are required to be setback 10'from edge of road per Town Code. 3. Sheet C1 does not match sheet A1.0, coordinate site/grading plans. C1 shows a single wall along the south side of the dv►ry, A1.0 shows a combination wall. 4. All retaining walls shall be a min of 2'from property line. i 5. A separate zone is required for the snowmelt located within the right-of-way. , 6. A revocable permit is required for all private f improvements located in the right-of-way. � 7. Proposed phone and tv service lines are shown on adjacent property. Provide copy of agreement with adjacent property owner for the encroachment or relocate ! to projecYs property. 06/02/2010 cs Action: COND snowmelt located within the ROW shall be on a separate zone �,r�rrr �»fxr�r+�R��t��tr+xx�+n.�:w��w��eRxxr:wwxr�rxw:e�wwxr»�,rrrw,er«rwxwt,rr��rrrx�wt,e+t�w++��+ww�+.:,r+�xx+xwxxw,raxx,exsx,rx�,r,rrrrrw,r:w�,r+.+.wi,��+x+.wi��r�a�t:r��x,r�,tis.wrt,ti�x�xx�t� i' i '� See th�Conditions section of this Document for any that may apply. � � � � � new_construction_perm it_041908 . f YffifY##f#ffflrR�fk#**f4ff1YRli1't�YSftttff*#fA4ff4�fLff�V RRRlRT V�RRrtfL44ffiYkrtV`Yt�'M1iy'fY(fR�Y'Rfrfr�/Yrkf4lrk#####1R V1rK1fV frfY'RYtRY4Yf'k'k�FYr*#4ff1e�lRMlrf4fRff4f'RiRitIrLRRRtRYfr�FYY`Yfy'y'Yt�Ft�A'�1"4H'ilAf}f#�IpAfrH#i CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit#: 610-0078 as of 06-03-2010 Status: ISSUED ifY/�Ye�Y*k/tf1Jk�A1r4 V RRfftllrRtftYAffY1►L'4'kY(tf`t�41ff#�#Rf'lR44f4f`Rf'f'IrwYfittlrffrtYe4iFR�FYe4fffrM'4'k'kfYtff1r44Y`*f`f`t`/}��RRfkf�RYflikikikfY`*#'.t#ff—R#f`ffR4f`lR1rfR VYRR1tfYY#Y�Yr4Mk'R'I#1`R44frRf�}fr}fMRffffYfrrtYiF'HfY Cond: 33 (PLAN)THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRED A SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY. SUCH SURVEY SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO REQUEST FOR A FRAME INSPECTION. Entry: 05/14/2010 By: mvaughan Action: COND provide information regarding outdoor fire pits. Manufacture cut sheets and construction of pit shall be detailed. Provide information regarding size of fire mains for suppression systems. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 42 (BLDG 2009) CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED PER 2009 IRC R315 i I � ( i � � � � �,I � � new construction_permit_041908 ***�********�***************�*****��**�*******��******�********�**************�********** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement �****r**�*******s********��***********+**********��********+*******�******r**�****r*�****** Statement Number: R100000606 Amount: $89,377.2606/03/201009:13 AM Payment Method: Check Init: JLE Notation: 427534 ALPINE BANK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B10-0078 Type: NEW (SFR, P/S,DUP) PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-1301-9 Site Address: 395 FOREST RD VAIL Location: 395 & 405 Forest Rd Total Fees: $99,263 .26 This Payment: $89, 377.26 Total ALL Pmts: $99,263 .26 Balance: $0.00 �******+�******rr****��************��*+�********s***�******************�****�**r************ ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------------- ------------------------------ ------------ BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 15,207.61 RF 11100003112700 RECREATION FEES 1, 765.65 UT 11000003106000 USE TAX 4� 72,400.00 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 4 .00 I � � � i ; i ,I I �':��t�z�.�i� ,.^�a,$��z� ��,s.. .� � :n.:;=,��o.�� :'�:�65 �z`'" 4 ,: z��w+. .f r�' ��: pw ��„`� •' '4 s. d#�^.a.:��'��#� . � y �., �.�i 3,'^ '�* c � t��'.�„f, ; ,�'°�,� �g xN�,��'��i"'� '��a.a'��&�� -�,.; �'.k.a�:� ��. ,'e�. .�.`" '�`s �v a �"r �F Ta� k� d=a� -�. �� °� � a � ��`�a� s � "�� '� �. ��s� k,2i 3=; 1 �„ , � x a3t�..°` Sz; � .. z5 x r Z ,, i � -a £q `�...�,�, '�;�zv �Y � �'�:. € y. , _ <f � - 3 . ,��° � '�s' � 9 �ia*i�'��.. �' �"q � t-' k�z' ,:. � •� � �k�r ��`��'�� '� °� �Department of3G.�rn� nr v ;lo men ' ,�� ,�� `�� °�r� . P {�iy��*�� , i��F � � �w��, . ��` _�� < �� ,$ �,:�� < ��5 Suuth Fro�tage� � ;�° , � a� "�i ��r t r� ,� s � ,� x�, � �� °�, `� � � .. & �� . _ `Va' °�. o� �,s.. .;: �+�.� ° ��e.�'" �c �,: �,a, �q'�i : � y ��„ �,�re .� �v° � b�� r �� . w ^ �^}� `-'=:s�..� _� x.fi ':� � ' ��' � �� "i,i�"�` , p.::_.,�� a � �..r�, .,, �' r ��3� . ...� � z : �� z' d�g; �� r �, �� a . `�.s�„..x, .:� ��# ^°:a� � r ,s.a � .y . a. s� " ,,`.e.� '�,��_4•��$- :� F - �� w:� . . � _,�- v. �,�•' �`� . .�^`�. _ a D . � �� I ��"'-� � ' �� i i ` �:�� :�_� ' �``°�� TRANSMITTAL FORM Revision Submittals: 1. "Field Set"of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved&the permit is re-issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55.00 per hour(2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. Permit#(s)information applies to: Attention: ( ) Revisions � fr U�•� �� ' OQ Response to Correction Letter } t�" attached copy of correction letter � ( )Deferred Submittal ( ) Other Project Street Address: f 3_�r rL-'�`s� � �/�'C% 1 Description/List of Changes: (Number) (Street) (Suite#) �6�. Y-��c,�,�` � �Building/Complex Name: `t��l�d, ��u'z,A.�C � - Contact Information: Company: � � Itt� �(�i.lS�� Company Address: v(.� ��C� �City: 1�1�U�L State: C�t..� Zip: 1 � 'Contact Name: �(�C�- �?�C�� Contad Phone: -L��" �� . � E-Mail �4f��l��c� �s� 4�1�J�t�SC�n.I� �`'YLZ � Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations(Labor&Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) �Building: $ - (use additional sheet if necessary) �Plumbing: $ Date Received: i Electncal: $ E �Mechanical: $ � � � a �/7 � Total: $ D � MAY 2 0 ZO10 TOWN OFVAIL O1-Jan-10 . • � �� 1� � Depa�tment of Community Development 5 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2138 FAX 97a47�2452 www.vailgov.com PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 5M 0/10 TO: RA Neison Idorothy�ranelson.com PERMIT APPLICATION #: B10-0078 PROJECT ADDRESS: 395/405 Forest Road OCCUPANCY GROUP: IRC TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: IRC NUMBER OF STORIES: 3 BUILDING AREA: 11771 s.f. • Submit four comalete sets of revised constna�tion documents containin�the reQUested information with all alan revision items clouded or otherwise ident�ed. • Please respond in writinc�to each comment with a response letter addressinq each comment. BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Architectural Comments: 1 Revise building sections to show all insulation values for roof, walls, floors, basement walls, slab edge insulation per IRC N1102.1. Notes have been added to Sectlons and detalls on archJtectura/drawin�rs. 2 Revise plans to show 1 hour floor/ceiling and wall construction at wall and floors separating dwelling units. IRC R302.3. Include details with UL listing for the assemblies. Floor/ceilin_q: UL L504 as noted on p/ans. Walls at mechanical room: UL U305 Structural Comments: See attached notes from Structural en_qineer. 3 Revise code edition to the 2009 IBC as adopted by Town of Vail 4 Include complete plans for the shoring wall stamped and signed by a Colorado State Licensed Engineer 5 Comptete the Town of Vail special inspection foRns attached. 6 Revise S2.1 to provide section detail references on all areas of the foundation plan where no detail is currently referenoed. 7 Include construction details for embed plates in foundation wall. 8 Complete framing plan for Iow roof areas on sheet S2. 9 Clarify framing at curved deck area, sheet S2.3, show revised deck framing as necessary. 2x12 �12°o.c. are shown spanning 18'. 10 Provide construction details for bent beam at entry roof. Sheet S2.3 11 Revise S2.2 to label al1 floor joist size and spacing where labels are missing 12 Revise plans to provide through bolting detail for side Ioaded (4) member LVL beams 13 Revise sheet S2.4 to provide construction details for bent beam. 14 Revise sheet S2.4 to label all beams where missing. 15 Revise sheet S3.1 to oomplete wall 12 detail Plumbins� Comments: 16 Maximum gas pipe size for exterior firepits is s/." per TOV ordinance. Revised p/ans show'/<"_qas line to frepits. Mechanical Comments: See plans from Mechanical enqineer addressinq comments. 17 Show a minimum .35 air changes per hour for the exercise room per IRC R303 18 Show kitchen range exhaust hood and ducting. Include make-up air if over 400 cfm per IRC M1503.4 19 Show clothes dryer exhaust ducts on the plans. Electrical Comments: 20 Revise electrical lighting plans to provide high efficacy for a minimum of 50% of the lighting. 21 Specify tamper resistant receptacles per NEC 22 Coordinate location of panels in the mechanical room with the boiler location. Provide working clearances per NEC PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS 1. Coordinate with the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District regarding landscaping and stairs in the vicinity of the sanitary sewer main along the west property line. This has been discussed with ERWSD and an encroachment easemertt will be requireal 2. Proposed tree, columns and gas lights (not shown on DRB set) are required to be setback 10' from edge of road per Town Code. Items in this set back hav�e been moved or de/eted. 3. Sheet C1 does not match sheet A1.0, coordinate site/grading plans. C1 shows a single wall along the south side of the dwy, A1.0 shows a combination wall. This walt was determined not to be necessarv bY the_aradin_a, how�ever will be constructed for landscapinq reasons. 4. All retaining walls shall be a min of 2'from property line. ProQOSed refainin_q walls will be constructed a minimum of 2'from all propert�r lines— noi+e addeal. 5. A separate zone is required for the snowmelt located within the right-of-way. Snow melt zones show separate zones for ri_qht of way. 6. A revocable permit is required for all private improvements located in the right-of-way. Permit witt be applied for bv RA Nelsons. 7. Proposed phone and tv service lines are shown on adjaoent property. Provide copy of agreement with adjacent property owner for the encroachment or relocate to project's property. The proposed tetephone and cab/e te%vision service lines have been moved to the east side of the ar+opertv line. DEVELOPMENT, LLC . , . - _ __-- - _ _ � , �} � �; '<< ; ,�,,,� � � r`� ,\. . ..�f. . ��'� _ � � �� • ' `` . ... � ' ..� �. :: _ Yt.�,_' �� •;; .. �� -�. �� iht��.: ..�: -I + i�� ,� , � .� +- - . ..,� ,r ' . . '� , _ � ;:n ` � 'r�"�':.�",�„r j� , .. , ��t �j 'i ��r -� ��\ �, � � • - �..�'� V �r , S. r:.;. � r •S. ,.<�� '� �.�4r,� � � � :3S .'� ,��;��"� � -•-,�.+��'�� . '�,.. `r�f M i�r"'�r��r��`�; � `'i�h ,_ . ... _�. .. __ .. _. .._'_.___�� 71=� �p�.ti/ c.^,sr> . _ . ' �� /FU: r�-1 '�l\p,li�r 3 �5 4 0 S F ore st Ro ad /� r+,..^ V'� .9 �`r i� �,.�,, Buildi.ng perm.it RE-submittal � � ��°`� �'>� 5-19-2010 ,�� `�� O � E. (3 �� ` 'c se No. 77 �� / ��S G�� D AR 8120 Woodmont Avenue • Suite 800• Bethesda, Maryland 20814 • Tel: 301.657.1112 • Fax 301.657.5948 74 Wllow Road • Vaii, CO 81657 i _ # �ow�a�v�,� . Department of Community Development 5 South Fro►rtage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2138 FAX 970-479-2452 w►row.vailgov.com PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 5/10/10 TO: RA Neison Idorothy�ranelson.com PERMIT APPLICATION#: B10-0078 PROJECT ADDRESS: 395/405 Forest Road OCCUPANCY GROUP: IRC TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: IRC NUMBER OF STORIES: 3 BUILDING AREA: 11771 s.f. • Submit four complete sets of revised construction documents containinq the requested information with all plan revision items clouded or othervvise ident�ed. • Please respond in writina to each comment with a resaonse letter addressin4 each comment. BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Architectural Commenffi: 1 Revise building secdons to show all insulation values for roof, walls, floors, basemerrt walls, slab edge insulation per IRC N1102.1. Notes have been added to Sections and details on architectura/drawin_as. 2 Revise plans to show 1 hour floor/ceiling and wall constnu:tion at wall and floors separating dwelling un�s. IRC R302.3. Indude details with UL listing for the assemblies. Floor/ceilina: UL L504 as noted on p/ans. Walls at mechanical room: UL U305 Structural Comments: See attached notes from Structura/enQineer. 3 Revise code edition to the 20091BC as adopted by Town of Vail 4 Include complete plans for the shoring wall stamped and signed by a Colorado State Licensed Engineer 5 Complete the Tovm of Vail special inspection forms attached. 6 Revise S2.1 to provide section detail references on all areas of the foundation plan where no detail is currently referenced. 7 Include construction details for embed plates in foundation wall. 8 Complete framing plan for low roof areas on sheet S2. 9 Clarify framing at curved deck area, sheet S2.3, show revised deck framing as necessary. 2x12 @12° o.c. a�e shown spanning 18'. 10 Provide construction details for bent beam at entry roof. Sheet S2.3 11 Revise S2.2 to label all floor joist size and spacing where labels are missing 12 Revise plans to provide through bolfing detail for side loaded (4) member LVL beams 13 Revise sheet S2.4 to provide constn.iction details for bent beam. 14 Revise sheet S2.4 to label all beams where missing. 15 Revise sheet S3.1 to complete wall 12 detail Plumbins�Comments: 16 Maximum gas pipe size for exterior firepits is�/.° per TOV ordinance. Revised plans show%"Qas line to fireaits. Mechanical Comments: See p/ans from Mechanica/en_aineer addressinQ comments. 1.We are providing 50 cfm to the exercise room from fan coil 2 which has 600 cfm of outside air. .35 air changes= 11 cfm, so we are exc:eeding that requirement 2. The range ven6ng is shown on MV2.1 and MY2.2, clouded.The make up air for the kitche�s is shown on MV2.2 via louvers and duct to FC-2 and FC-4, cbuded, as discussed. 3. Clothes dryer exhaust ducts are indicated on the plans, clouded, and indude the addition of a dryer booster fan on MV2.3. Note: �efer to the schedule sheet, M1.0,for outside air quantities and fan specfications. These are also shown clouded. Electrical Comments: 20 Revise electrical lighting plans to provide high efficacy for a minimum of 50% of the lighting. A general note stating "A minimum of 50 percent of the lamps in permanently installed lighting fixtures shall be high-efficacy lamps." will be added to sheets E2.1, E2.2, and E2.3 21 Specify tamper resistant receptacles per NEC Electrical notes on sheet E1.0 will be revised to include the following "PROVIDE TAMPER RESISTANT RECEPTACLES PER NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE" 22 Coordinate location of panels in the mechanical room with the boiler location. Provide working clearances per NEC Electrical notes on sheet E1.0 will be revised to include the following "COORDINATE LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AS TO MAINTAIN WORKING CLEARANCE PER NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE° PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS 1. Coordinate with the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District regarding landscaping and stairs in the vicinity of the sanitary sewer main along the west property line. This has been discussed with ERWSD and an encroachment easement wil/be reQUired. 2. Proposed tree, columns and gas lights(not shown on DRB set) are required to be setbadc 10'from edge of road per Town Code. /tems in this set back have been moved or deleted. 3. Sheet C1 dces not match sheet A1.0, coordinate site/grading plans. C1 shows a single wall along the south side of the dwy, A1.0 shows a combination wall. This wall was determined not to be necessarv bv the Qradino, however wil/ be constructed for landscavina reasons. 4. All retaining walls shall be a min of 2'from property line. Proaosed retainin_a walls will be constructed a minimum of 2'from all propertv lines—note added. 5. A separate zone is required for the snowmelt located within the right-of-way. Snow me/t zones show separate zones for riQht of wav. 6. A revocable permit is required for all private improvements located in the right-of-way. Permit will be aavlied for b v RA Nelsons. 7. Proposed phone and tv service lines are shown on adjacent properiy. Provide copy of agreement with adjacent property owner for the encroachment or relocate to proje�t's property. The aroaosed te/eahone and cab/e television service lines have been moved to the east side of the properhr line. Vail. Colorad�� I)cnvet, Coloradc� Fricco. Color•rdo � Rinc. co�orado I Monroe �� Newell FR�;�n��m, rn��. May 12,2010 Triumph West Development 8120 Woodmont Ave., Suite 800 Bethesda,Maryland 20814 Attn:Mr.Mike Foster Re: 395/405 Forest Road(M&N#8123) Dear Mike: The following is our response to the Structural comments of the Project Review Comments by the Town of Vail dated 5/IO/2010. Item 3. The general notes have been modified to reflect the con�ect adopted code 2010 IBC. Item 4. Shoring wall and calculations to be supptied by Sharing subcontractor. Item 5. See attached special inspection forms. Item 6. See revised sheet 52.1 reflecting updated section cuts at alI foundation walls, Item 7. See attached section 7/S1.1 for embed plate detail. Item S. See attached updated framing for low roof sheet 52.3 Item 9. See attached updated framing at curved deck sheet 52.3 Item I0. Bent beam connection is described in note form#20 sheet S2.4. Item 11. See attached updated framing on S2.2. Item 12. See attached updated framing showing no built up 4 member LVL beams with side loading. � � Colorado .��roa��„ „T �;,.,.,.:, .,. Platinum Sponsor �a��s �v��•��•.mnnrc�r-ne��•ell.c om l7Ul vVynkoop Str�ct • Suite 2f)0 • ncnvcr. Cc>l<�r.ictc� li0202 ant♦ /.'19 Rn-�-r . r.•v r�n'J� �� i;/_n7 . .......:1. .1..........l.i�............. .........lt .. Item 13. See item 10 above. Item I4. See attached updated sheet S2.4 showing all beams labeled. Item 15. See attached updated wa[I eIevation I2/53.1. If you have any yuestions or comments,please call. Very truly yours, MONROE&NEWELL ENGINEERS,INC. � � � C:ra' Carroll P.E. Pri cipal . • 2005 FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY FlRE RESISTANCE RAT{NGS-ANSWL 263(BXU1n � FlRE RESISTANCE RA71NG$-ANSWL 263(BXUV) 367 �plied to the surFace of the mat pdor N thc fkwr h�pin�p4xemrnt. LA�ARGE�IOiCfti A1IAERICA IIYC TyFes LG}�C3,LGFC-C. a,r roppin�thicknes.c�twll be as specified undiv Floor 1'opping I.t:l�t-C';.�. [iztare. NATIOhAL GYPSUM CO—ivpes i�'SK-i.F5K-C.FSK-G.ESW-1. MAXXON CORP—T��+e Amu.cci-�4at li F�W{',�'�'�'�`{;• leh[Lath—Fcx use witti ticx�r mat material,3/S in.expanded,r,.al- PABCO GYPSUM,DIV OF mized steei diamond mesh,3.�[bs/sq yd plattd c�.�c�r thc fl�wr mat � PACIFtC COAST BUILQING PRODUCI'S INC Ti•pes PG-1, wterial. I'(:-3.1'C�-l. STANDARD GYI'SUM L L C Tvpe SC;C-1,SC;-C ar SGC-G. inish Flooring-Floor t'opping Mi�ctare•?�iin 1 in.thickness ot fl�x�r TE14tPLE-iNLAND FOREST PRObUCTS CORP Ti pc T,TG-C �ppin�mixtuR ha�•in�a min compr+e��•e�tten�th ut NKIp F+si.l�ti�- VPii-Ti,•pe T. itr sha}t c�nsist or 3 to 7 gal of ti•ater mixed��•ith t�0 lM of flcx�r top- h. Fenishing System — Vim•l,dry or prernixec!joint compound,applied in�mixture and t.0 to 2.l ev ft of sand. in h�•o a�at+tu juint�and sar�r•-heads.�Ium�in.wide paper tape 4(AXXON CORP—Tv D{,GC,GC 2(M10,L-R,T-F,CT , emt+iki.led in fir�t la�•Erc af�t�mpuund orrr a11 join�.As an altrmate, Sy�sMm Alo.9 num�/32 in.thicl.�cnitr plaatcr rsw�-6c applicd to thc cntim surfacc a�};�•}xum boarti. abflooring—�fin 1 b�•6 in.T ds G lumher factened diakronall}•h� ;, Grille— �t�r I�,riHe,instatled in accor�fance�vith thc installa6an istc,nr min 15/32 in.thick wax�sWctural paruls,min gra�"C-D" instrucHotts pn��•idid�vith thr ceiliny damper. -"Sh��athing".Face�rain of ply�vcxkt or ctrength axis of panels tu be 'Fiearin};thr UT (�la.�t+�. ' :rpenditu4ir to the joi�ts with juints sta�;};ered. D2S1gI1 NO. I.504 apcn Burier•IOptionai)—Nom O.OtQ in.thick aunmcrcial rcrin- Cnrestr mg—1 Hr. zed buitdinK paper. Finish Rating—2�Min. inish Floor-Mineral and Fiber Board•—Min l/2 in.thicl:.�up- lied in sirrs ranguzK fmm$ft by 4 ft to S ft h�•1^_ft.�ll joints h�br ag�,rec�ed a min of 12 in.with adjacent sub-floor j�,int+. ._ ._ _ __.------------- HOMASOTE CO—T��pe 44(1-32 Mina7al and Ft+er fi�wrd System Na 10 • _ ub800ring—�lin 1 by 6 in.T&G lumbet fastrned diaKvnall��tc+ 4sb,or min 15/32 in.thick wcx�d s�truduril panels,min Frade"C-D" _. --- r"Sheathing".Fa�ti grain of plywcwd nr strnn�h axis nf pam�l+n,Lx• ` - ----__----- :tpen�iicular tu the joists with joints swggemd. apor Bacrier-(OptionaU—Nom U.tllt)in.thi�ic ccxnmrrcial rt�sin- - -"" - zcsi building paper. , , , .s � apor Baaier IOptionap—Vom U.t)30 in.thick commereial as�hatt �:.� ti > durah�d klt. •" . inish flooring-Floor Toppiag Mixture*—�iin I-1;3 in.thi�kn«s =--- _--=- 2005 FlRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY �g FIRE RESlSTANCE RATfl�iS-ANSWL 263(BXUh FlRE RESISTANCE RATINGS-A[iSMll.Z63(BXU1� Metai lath — For ase w�ith floor mat maMrkil,3/:�in.e��wrxird�1- axL•c�f panele to!x perpendicular to joists x�th iointc st<i�etrd_ ��anized stee!�tiamand rstesh�.�Ibs/sq yd placed rnrr thc fl�x�r mat Systtm No.2 materiat. SubAooring—�1in 1�/32 in.thick wcwd structurai�+anels,min grad� Finish floori�-kloor Topping Mizture• — Min 3/�in.thi:krxy nf "C-lY'or"Sheathing".Face grain of plywcxxi or stren�th a�s of parre � floo� in mixtum ha�� a min com mi�e�trcn uf 121K1 i. roPP S T'6 P'�•• Km F` tu be peroendicular to the joists wett�jointa sta�etrd. MIXh]R SF1dII COi1SLSt Of�t0 7 g1I 11E WdtE7 rtllakh{N•ith rNl Ibc of 8cmr Vapor Barrier-lOptionaD—�lom 0.0:�0 in thick commercial asphal toppinR mixture ared 1.�R�l'►eu R c�(sand. wturatcd fclt. RAPID FLOOR SYSTEMS—Tt�RF.RFf',RfL',KIR, f7��Mat Materials•-(Optionail—�fln 3/R in.to max 31�in.thic Ot�ecRtr 2 Soue&Deadening Board — 'Vc+m�hv K it bc t/2 in. thi.k plain �t�x�r mat mah.�ria!Icwse laid m•er the suMlc�or.Floor toFFing thickne wood fiber board xeiKhing 15 to t8!b Prr cu ft I�.tall.d��•itF�lan� sh�((be a.cpecified e�nder Ftoar Topping Mixture. dimension parallel w•ith stringen and attkhed tn e.xh.-trin�.•r�.•ith�i UTlITED STATES GYPSUM CO—leLelrotk Arand S�utnd �:t cement coatecf cooler nails,1-61R in.long,.t�1h in.shank di.�metrr�vitl� Reciuction Doard -!�,`r�-:=' l/4 in.diameter flat head spacrd rwik 12 in.C1C.11n�ils spaced 1/'_in. Alternate Floor Mat Materials•-(OptionaU—Vom 1/�in.thick �` 3 from side and��nd joints. Roor mat material Icxise I�id o�•er the subflax Floc�r topping tisiclmc ��" 3. Gypsnm Board'— Nom i/2 in.thick inalaltati�.•ith fun�;dimcn.i�+n chall tK as spEriGed undcr floor Topping Mixture. `.., perpendicular to strin�e�c and.rcvred to each+trinXer«�ith 2i1 c�ment : UNITED STA7'ES GYPSUM CO—Le�>eln�ck Brand Floor l'md coated coolrr naiL+.2-.'�/S in.long,U.Il3 irt.aliank diamcter��-ith Q/3_ lavmcnt SR1N(-2j "� in,diameter flat head spared 6 ia C1C at rnd'print�an�t�in.CK'rl,r- Altemate Floor Mat Materials'-IdptionaU — \rnn 3/8 in.thick ` where.�iails spaced 3/�arui I/2 in.frum side and end'p+inh.n�x�- Flcrrc mat material Ic�se laid a��er che�uhRuor.Floor Mpping thicl� � rivelv Joints in�yp.um boaed�hall be stap,g��rd.+•ith K+incs in u�und- +hall t+c a,s�eciEied under Floor Topping Mixture. dradming�board. SOLUTiA INC—Typc 56(1 AMERICAN GYPSUM CO—T��pc AC:-C. F'mish flooring-Floor Topping Mixtnre" — tlin 3/�or 1 in.thid BPB AMERIG INC—t'�FIiI'C�x ti{�,ar Pn�Rix li�x C'. nrs.+uf flcmr tu p ptt�mizture for min 1Q/32 ur min 15/32 in.thick B P B CANADA IP1 C—P r o x Tt•�C. �v�x x f strtutura�Fuu l s tes�ectiv e l�;h a�ing a min amtpressi�e�trcr ` G-P GYPSUM CORP,SUB OF � ��f I�{H1�+si_Refer to manutactncer's instructionc acuxnpannng the � CEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP—Tv �S.C�,c:PF.ti1.D:1!'.Dr\. mah•ria(k�r s•pecific mix d�i�n. LAEARGE NOR7Ti AMERICA�I�C—T}-pe.1,GFC3,I.t:rC�{', UN1TEb STATES GYPS[7M CO—Cc�•elnxk 2�IQ,Le�elmtk LGFGC/A. System No.3 NA'iiO3YAL GYPSUM CO—Tyft�c P5K-I,FSt��,('�K-L:,I�tiV-1, Sa!+9ooring—�tin l5/32 in.tbick wood etruchsrat panels,min gr FSW-C,E'SW-G. "C-U"or"Shcathin�".Face grain of plvwood or strertgth axis of}+a PABCO GYPSUM,DtV OF to bc F+erperniicula*tn the jnis�with joints stuggerecl. PAQF[C COAST BUILDII�fG PRODUCTS ENC--C�•pr.I'(ri, Vapor Barrier-IOptional)—\�an 0.030 in thick ccxnmercial asph �'3��'�• saturatrd kFt. STANQARD GYPSUM L 1 C T��tiC:-G K:C-1 ur tit:C-c;. Finish F7oortng-E1eor Topping Mixture"—�1in 1-1/2 in.thklm TEMPL�INLAND FOREST PRODUCTS CORP--T�•�+c CC:-C „f ficx�r tupping mixture h.n�ng a min comprcssive�trenFth��f ltll �. F'mishing Systan-INot Sho.vn)— Vnvl.dn•or pitmiuwi K,inl a�m- i an�i a ca.st density of 100 lus or minuc 5 E Fcwm cancentra pound.applied in two cvats to jaints an.�l scm��•-hc.x1�.�ii�m^_in.N•idc Pti P P�• paper tape eml+edded in firat lavcr of�rompuund ovrr alt jain�..:�.�an mi�cct-�r[f+��•oEume r,ith water and expanded at I(ttl psi MmuR altemate,nom 3/32 in thicl:venerr plast�r ma� be a�+plieci tu tfir rnn.�te.��ixture shall mnsict at lA cu feet of pmh+rmcd foam can �tire surface of gvpsum boai+d. trate to v�Ib�T.Fx 1 Portland cement,300 tbs of sand with:i-1/2 `8earin�tf�e L;L Cla:sifjcation Mark nf�vatcv. Design NO. L505 ELASTiZELL CORP OF AMERICA—Type FF Unrestrained Asiembtr Rating—Z Hr. Syston No.4 �nish Rating—75 Mi�. SubAooring—Vfin 15/32 in.thick�ccx�d structural panelc,min} "C-ll"or"Shcathing°.Face grain of pltrwood ur strength axic of F � � ; tn be�+erpendicul�r M the joists��ith jaints stagFe�rd. Vapor Barrier-(Optional)—Nam 0.0.30 in thick mmmercial a� � wtunktii felt. . Floor Mat Materials'-(Optional)—Nom 1/�in.thick 8�xu ma �' � mah�rial adhered to a�bftoc�r with Hacker Floor Primer.Primer h .,ppli�l h�the surface of the mat prior M the placement aE fio�m - toppin}�mirture_When�cnw mat material is used,min thickner ftcxir h��ing miztum ic i-]/2 in HAQCER INDUS'IRIES fNC—Type Srnznd:�tat — �—�___=__ -- __-__--- _ -` Fmish flaoring-Floor'Copping Mizturn•—?�9in 3/4 or 1 in.t' -� nc�uf ftcx�r topping mixture for min 19/32 or min 15/32 in.th � � ��•�xx1 stnxtural pa�ls cespecti�•el_v,haeing a min compress;��r _ strcn};th of 1100 pci.Mixture shall con�ist c�f 6.8 qal of warer to _ �. _ _ - oi ticwr topping mixhnr m 1.9 cu ft ef sand. HACKIIt INDUSTRIES INC—F'irm-Fill Gvpsum Concre __�j__ _`_ - �_- . _f: Pirm-Fill 2010,Firm-Fill 33t0,Firm-�ill df11U.Rrm-Fill H � , _ --- _f � , ctrenKth,GyP'Span Radiant __ _ __ System No.5 5abfloorinb—Min 15/32 in.thick wood structurai paneL�,mi "'- =°'""" '"-, L-B"�,r"'.�Fnathing"_Face grain of plywewd or stren�th axic r " ,-�� 4�be F'erPe^dicular M ehe joists with joints stagRered. 1. Floodmg Syslem —The flooring�vstem shall mmi�t c�E�m.•of thc Vapor Barrier-(Optional)—�om O.Q'i(f in thitk mmmercial. fnUowing: .aturated fclt System Na 1 Finish Eiooring-Floor 1'opping Mixture•—wi'in lin.thickne Snbflooritig—Min t!+y 6 in.T&C;lumbrr factined diaga�alFc to fl<Ktr tc+pping mixlure haring a min Comprrssi�•e strength of li joisb,or min l5/32 in.thick cvooci ahtklural panck��r 7/16 in.thick �nd 3��yt densil�•of 100 plus or minua�pcE Fnam rnnterttta oriented strand twanf(OSB)��roud<tnxturat parnls,min�,-rade C-U" .!(}1 by culume with�vatet and r.cpanded at IO(I psi tlwugh t or"Sheathing".Face grain uf pl}M•ue�d��r strc�r►gth a�ic n(parx�l.e,tx• ;�qirture vhall mnsist of 1.�cu feet o€prck+rtned h�am rnncenl perpendicular to the joists wiM j01ntS SW�end. Ihc 7vpe 11'ortland cement,62S lb of pea gncel.31�5!lx of Vapor Burier—Nom UA10 ia thi�k comm��rcial tt�in-siixd buildin?= ti+•ith�-VZ kdl Pf►vatttr. ( PaP� � LI'fE-CRETE INC—Tvpe I Finish F7oosing—Min 1 by-�in.T dc G lumber f�trncd perpcndicu- �ystem No.6 lar to Taists,or min I9/32 in.wood stnutural panel�,min�de Subfloorin¢—!ldin]9l32 in.thick wcx�d struchuai vanets,n BXLTV.U305 -Fire Resista.nce Ratings -ANSUiJL 263 Page 1 of 9 11` �MLINE CERTIFICATIOMS DIRECTQRY Y BXUV.U305 Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSi/UL 263 p�ye Bottom Design/System/Construction/Assembly Usage Disciaimer • Authorities Haviny]urisdiction should be consulted in all cases as to the particular requirements covering the installation and use of UL Listed or Classified products,equipment,system,devlces, end materials. • Authorities Having]urisdiction should be consulted before construdion. • Fre resistance assembiies and p�oducts are developed by the design submitter and have been investigated by UL for compliance with applicable requirements.The published information cannot always address every construction nuance encountered in the field. • When field issues arise, it is recommended the first contact for assistance be the technical service staff provided by the product manufacturer noted for the design. Users of fire resistance assemblies are advised to consult the general Guide Information for each produd cateqory and each qroup of assemblies.The Guide Information includes specifics concerning altemate materials and altemate methods of construclion. • �nly products which bear UL's Mark are considered as Classified, Listed,or Recognized. Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI/UL 263 See General Information for Flre Resistance Ratinqs-ANSI/UL 263 Deripn No.U305 March 03, 2010 Besrirp Wall Ratiny— 1 HR. Finbh Ratin�—See Items 3,3A,3D,3E,3F,3G,3H�nd 3I. STC Ratiny-56(See Itam 9) Losd Restricted for Canadi�n Applic�tions—Sce Guide BxuV7 �.r.- .--�-.. •�'--�� t �'`; : � � '� : . � ; i ,� `` �_� � ;�r ~� ,,A � � �1 � j , ',,, •,` �� 1 1 ` � �' � r•::•:-.::.... :.......�•------:�: ...... • - -----:-----�-:-----.. �---------- -----------i IMh„N/4�� MMMWI+I�MIHYMNrMI�a� • • +1V+V�IrHwNWMitiiN��w4 ••:�I�IMrnM�1 �M ��MInFOMMNWI� 1 • � j � � � . 1 ± •• ��r ^��ri ) y • 1 � � �11�.] C.r�.riTexr�� r� .� `l t°� .� Y� >y,S � �: arr� - — y: � '-- -ti' � - +L�� --� - - ___�_! ' . ... . ,� : � J ,s• . ��ti /'• � 1 ; � lI f��f, �,�1• j � + ,/ . f 1 , '``w.w�� t�.! I' � ! +L J J� http://database.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/template/LISEXT/1 FRAME/showpage.html?name=BXUV.... 5/17/2010 BXW.U305 -Fire Resistance Ratings-ANSI/iJL 263 Page 2 of 9 12 2 5 3 � 1 1. Wood Studs—Nom 2 by 4 in, spaced 16 in.OC max,effectively firestopped. 2.]oinb and Nail-MMds—loints covered with joint compound and paper tape.Joint compound and paper tape may be omitted when square edge boards are used.As an altemate, nom 3/32 in. thick gypsum veneer plaster may be appiied to the entire surface of Classified veneer baseboard with the joints reinforced with paper tape. Nailheads exposed or covered with joint compound. 3. tiyp�um Board* —5/8 in.thick paper or vinyi surfaced,with beveled, square,or tapered edges,applied either horizontaily or vertically. Gypsum panels nailed 7 in.OC with 6d ceme�t coated nails 1-7/8 in. long,0.0915 in. shank diam and 15/64 in.diam heads.When used in widths olher than 48 in., gypsum panels are to be installed horizontally. For an alternate method of attachment of gypsum panels, refer to Item 6, 6A or 6B, Stad Framiny Memben*. When Item 6, Steel Framiny Memben*, is used, gypsum panels attached to furring channels with 1 in.long Type S bugle-head steel screws spaced 12 in.OC. When Item 6A, Sbsel Framinq Members*, is used,two layers of gypsum panels attached to furring channels. Base layer attached to furring channels with 1 in. lony Type S bugle-head steel screws spaced 12 in.OC. Face layer attached to fuRing channels with 1-5/8 in.long Type S bugle-head steel screws spaced 12 in.OC.All joints in face layers staqgered with joints in base layers. One layer of gypsum board attached to opposite side of wood stud without furring channeis as described in Item 3. When Item 68, Steel Framinq Memb�n*, is used,two layers of yypsum panels attached to furring channeis. Base layer attached to furriny channels with i in. long Type S bugle-head steel screws spaced 12 in,OC. Face layer attached to furcing channels with i-5/8 in. long Type S buqle-head steel screws spaced 12 in. OC.All joints in face layer stagyered with joints in base layer a minimum of 16 in.Joints oriented vertically and base layer staggered on opposite sides of the assemb�y.One layer of gypsum board attached to opposite side of wood stud without furring channels as described in Item 3. When Item 7, resilient channels are used, 5/8 in.thick, 4 ft wide gypsum panels applied vertically.Screw attached furring channels with 1 in. long, self-drilling,self-tapping Type S or S-12 steei screws spaced 8 in.OC,vertical . joints located midway between studs. ' AMERICAN GYPSUM CO—Types AGX-1(finish rating 23 min.),Type AGX-il (finish rattng 26 min)or Type AG-C BEI7ING NEW BUILDING MATERIALS PUBLIC LTD CO—Type DBX-1(�inish rating 24 min). CERTAINTEED GYPSUM INC—Type 1,Type SF3(finish reting 20 min) or FRPC, ProRoc Type C or ProRoc Type X (finish rating 26 min),Type EGRG or GiasRoc(finish rating 23 min) http://database.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/template/LISEXT/1 FRAME/showpage.htrnl?name=BXUV.... 5/17/2010 BXLTV.U305 -Fire Resistance Ratings -ANSULTL 263 rage s ot y CERTAINTEED GYPSUM CANADA INC—ProRoc Type C, ProRoc Type X or ProRoc Type Abuse-Resistant(finish rating 26 min) CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY—Type AR(finish rating 24 min), Type C(finish rating 24 min),Type FCV(finish rating 24 min),Type IP-AR(finish rating 24 min),Type IPC-AR(finish rating 24 min),Type IP-Xl (fin(sh rating 24 min),Type IP-X2(finish ratiny 24 min),Type SCX(finish rating 24 min),Type SHX(finish ratin9 24 min),Type WRC(finish rating 24 min),Type WRX(finish rating 24 min). GEORGIA-PACIFIC GYPSUM L L C —Type 5(finish rating 26 min),Type 6(finish rating 23 min),Type 9(finish rating 26 min),Type C(finish ratiny 26 min),Type DGG(finish rating 20 min),Type GPFS1(finish rating 20 min), Type GPFS2(finish rating 20 min),Type GPFS6(finish rating 26 min),Type DS,Type DAP,Type DD(finish rating 20 min), DA, DAPC. LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC—Type LGFC2(finish rating 20 min),Type LGFC3(finish rating 20 min),Type LGFC6(finish rating 26 min),Type LGFC-C(finish rating 20 min),Type LGFC6A(finish rating 34 min),Type LGFC2A,Type LGFC-C/A,Type LGFC-WD. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO—Type FSK(finish rating 20 min),Type FSK-G(finish ratiny 20 min),Type FSW(finish rating 20 min),Type FSW-2(finish ratinq 24 min),Type FSW-3(finish rating 20 min),Type FSW-5(finish rating 22 min),Type FSW-G(finish rating 20 min),Type FSK-C(finish ratinq 20 min),Type FSW-C(finish rating 20 min), Typa FSMR-C,Type FSW-6(finish rating 20 min). PABCO BUILDING PRODUCTS L L C,DBA PABCO GYPSUM—Types C, PG-2(flnish rating 20 min), PG-3(finish rating 20 min),Types PG-3W, PG-5W(finish rating 20 min),Type PG-4(finish rating 20 min),Type PG-6(finish rating 23 min),Types PG-3WS, PG-5W5 (finish ratinq 20 min),Types PG-5, PG-9(finish rating 26 min), PG-il or Type PG-C. PANEL REY S A—Type PRX. SIAM GYPSUM INDUSTRY(SARABURI)CO LTD—Type EX-1(finish rating 26 min) TEMPLE-INLAND—Type X,Veneer Plaster Base-Type X,Water Rated -Type X, Sheathing -Type X, Soffit- Type X. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Type AR(finish rating 24 min),Type SCX(finish ratinq 24 min),Type C(finish reting 24 min),Type WRX(finish ratiny 24 min),Type WRC(finish rating 24 min),Type IP-Xi (finish rating 24 min),Type FCU(finish ratinq 24 min),Type IP-X2(finish rating 24 min),Type SHX(finish rating 24 min),Type FRX-G(finish ratinq 29 min),Type IP-AR(finish rating 24 min),Type IPC-AR(finish rating 24 min). USG MEXICO S A DE C V—Type AR(finish rating 24 min),Type C(finish ratinq 24 min),Type WRX(finish rating 24 min),Type WRC(finish ratiny 24 min),Type IP-Xi (finish ratin9 24 min),Type FC�/(finish rating 24 min),Type IP-X2(finish reting 24 min),Type SHX(finish rating 24 min), SCX(finish rating 24 min),Type IP-AR(�inish rating 24 min),Type IPC-AR(finish ratinq 24 min). 3A.Gyrpsum Board* — (As an altemate to Item 3)— 5/8 in.thick gypsum panels,with beveled, square,or tapered edges, applied either horizontally or vertically. Gypsum panels fastened to framing with 1-1/4 in. long Type W coarse thread gypsum panel steel screws spaced a max 8 in. OC,with tast screw 1 in.from edge of board.When used in widths of other than 48 in.,gypsum boards are to be installed horizontally. AMERICAN GYPSUM CO—Types AGX-1(finish rating 25 min.),Type AG-C(finish rating 25 min.). CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY—Type AR(finish ratiny 24 min),Type C(finish rating 24 min),Type F(.1/(finish rating 24 min) ,Type IP-AR(finish rating 24 min),Type IPC-AR(finish rating 24 min),Type IP-Xl (finish rating 24 http://database.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/template/LISEXT/1FRAMElshowpage.html?name=BXUV.... 5/17/2010 BXiTV.U305 -Fire Resistance Ratings -ANSUUL 263 Page 4 of 9 min),Type IP-X2(finish rating 24 min),Type SCX (finish ratinq 24 min),Type SHX(finish rating 24 min),Type WRC(finish ratiny 24 min),Type WRX(finish roting 24 min). UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO—Type AR(finish ratiny 24 min),Type SCX(finish rating 24 min),Type C(finish reting 24 min),Type WRX(finish rating 24 min),Type WRC(finish rating 24 min),Type IP-Xi (finish rating 24 min),Type FGY(finish ratiny 24 min),Type IP-X2(finish ratiny 24 min),Type SHX(finish rating 24 min),Type FRX-G(finish rating 24 min),Type IP-AR(finish retiny 24 min),Type IPC-AR(finish rating 24 min). USG MDQCO S A DE C V—Type AR(finish rating 24 min),Type C(finish ratiny 24 min),Type WRX (finish rating 24 min),Type WRC(finish rating 24 min),Type IP-Xl (finish rating 24 min),Type FC1/(finish rating 24 min),Type IP-X2(finish rating 24 min),Type SHX(finish rating 24 min),Type SCX,Type IP-AR(finish rating 24 min),Type IPC-AR(finish rating 24 min). 36. Gypsum Board* —(As an alternate to Item 3) —Nom 3/4 in.thick, installed with 1-7/8 in. long cement coated nails as described in Item 3 or 1-3/8 in, fong Type W coarse thread gypsum panel steel screws as described in Item 3A. CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY—Types AR, IP-AR. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO—Types AR,IP-AR. USG MIXICO S A DE C V—Types AR, IP-AR. 3C. Gypsum Board* — (As an altemate to Items 3, 3A and 3B)- 5/8 in.thick, 2 ft wide, tongue and yroove edge, applied horizontally to one side of the assembly.Installed with 1-7/8 in.lonq cement coated nails as described in Item 3 or 1-1/4 in. long Type W coarse thread gypsum panel steel screws as described in Item 3A.loint covering (Item 2) not required. CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY—Type SHX. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO—Type SHX. USG MEXICO S A DE C V—Type SHX. 3D. Wali and Partitan F�cin�and Acce�sories* —(As an alternate to Items 3, 3A, 36 and 3C, not shown) - Nominal 5/8 in.thick,4 ft wide paneis, applied vertically to studs and beariny plates on one side of the assembly with 1-5/8 in. long Type S screws spaced 12 in. OC at perimeter of panels and 8 fn. OC in the fimld. Horizontal joints of vertically applied panels need not be backed by studs. Panel joints covered with paper tape and two layers of joint compound.Screwheads covered with two layers of joint compound. Batts and Blankets placed in stud cavity as described in Item 5E. Not evaluated for use with Steel Framing Members, Furring Channels or Fber,Sprayed. QUIET SOLUTION INC—Type QuietRock QR-530(finish rating 23 min). 3E. Gypsum Board* — (As an altemate to Items 3, 3A, 36, 3C,or 3D-not shown) For Direct Application to Studs Only- Nom 5/8 in.thick lead backed gypsum panels with beveled, square or tapered edqes, applied vertically. Vertical joints centered over studs and staggered min 1 stud cavity on opposite sides of studs.Wallboard secured to studs with i-5/8 in. lonq Type W coarse thread gypsum panel steei screws spaced 8 in.OC at perimeter and in the field. Lead batten strips required behind vertical joints of lead backed gypsum wallboard and optional at remaining stud locations. Lead batten strips, min 1-1/2 in.wide, max 10 ft lony with a max thickness of 0.125 in. placed on the face of studs and attached to the stud with two 1 in. lonq Type S-12 pan head steel screws,one at the top of the strip and one at the bottom of the strip. Lead discs or tabs may be used in lieu of or in addition to the lead batten strips or optional at other locations. Max 3/4 in. diam by max 0.125 in.thick lead discs compression fitted or adhered over steel screw heads or max 1/2 in. by 1-1/4 in. by max 0.125 in.thick lead tabs placed on gypsum boards underneath screw locations prior to the installation of the screws. Lead batten strips to have a purity of 99.9% meeting the Federol specifcation QQ-L-201f, Grade "C". RAY-BAR ENGINEERING CORP—Type RB-LBG (finish rating 24 min). http:l/database.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/templatelLISEXT/1 FRAME/showpage.html?name=BXLTV.... 5/17/2010 BXUV.U305 -Fire Resistance Ratings -ANSUUL 263 Page 5 of 9 3F.hs rpsum Board* —(As an alternate to Items 3, 3A, 36, 3C, 3D, and 3E)—5/S in.thick gypsum panels,with square edyes, appfied either horizontally or vertically.Gypsum panels fastened to framing with 1-1/4 in, long Type W coarse thread yypsum panel stael screws spaced a max 8 in. OC,with last 2 screws 1 and 4 in.from edqe of board or nailed 7 in.OC with 6d cement coated nails 1-7/8 in. long,0.0915 in.shank diam and 15/64 in.diam heads. When used in widths of other than 48 in., gypsum boards are to be installed horizontally.]oints and nail heads treated as described in Item 2. TEMPLE-INLAND—GreenGlass Type X(finish rating 23 min). 3G.Gyp�utn Bo�rd'� —(As an alternate to Items 3, 3A, 36, 3C, 3D, 3E and 3�- 5/8 in.glass-mat faced with square edges, applied either horizontally or vertically.Gypsum panels nailed 7 in.OC around the perimeter and in the field with 6d cement wated nails i-7/8 in. lonq, 0.0915 in.shank diam and 15/64 in. diam heads. Nails shall be placed 1 inch and 3 inch from horizontal joints and 7 inch OC thereafter. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO—Type USGX(finish rating 22 min.) 3H. Gyrp�um Board'� —(As an altemate to Items 3 through 3G)- 5/8 in.thick paper wrfaced applied vertically. Gypsum panels nailed 7 in.OC with 6d cement coated nails 1-7/8 in. lonq, 0.0915 in. shank diam and 15/64 in. diam heads. TEMPLE-INLAND—Type X ComfortGuard Sound Deadening Gypsum Board(finish rating 27 min). 3I.Gyp�um Bwrd* —(As an alternate to Items 3) - Not to be used with items 6 or 7. 5/8 in.thick paper surfaced applied vertically only.Gypsum panels nailed 7 in. OC with 6d cement coated nails 1-7/8 in.long,0.0915 in.shank diam and 15/64 in. diam heads. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO—SoundBreak XP Type X Gypsum Board 37.Wall and P�rtition F�ci�qs and Acceswrias* —(As an alternate to Items 3 throuqh 3I, not shown)— Nominal 5/8 in,thick,4 ft wide panels, applied verticalty. Panels nailed 7 in.OC with 6d cement coated naifs 1-7/8 in. long,0.0915 in. shank diam and 15/64 in.diam heads. Panel joints covered with paper tape and two layers of joint compound. Nailheads covered with two layers of joint compound. QUIET SOLUTION INC—Type QuietRock ES (finish rating 21 min),Type QuietRock QR-527 (finish rating 24 min). 4. Steel Corner Fastcn�s—(Optional)—For use at wall corners.Channel shaped, 2 in. long by 1 in. high on the back sida with two 1/S in.wide cleats protruding into the 5/8 in.wide channel,fabricated from 24 gauge galv steel.Fasteners applied only to the end or cut edge (not alony tapered edges)of the gypsum board, no greater than 2 in.from comer of gypsum board,max spacing 16 in. OC. Nafled to adjacent stud throuyh tab using one No. 6d cement coated nail per fastener.Corners of wall board shall be nailed to top and bottom plate using No. 6d cement coated nails. 5. Batts snd Bl�nkeb* —(Optional- Required when Item 6A is used ) Glass fiber or mineral wool insulation. Placed to completely or partially fill the stud cavities.When Item 6A is used, glass fiber or mirteral wool insulation shall be placed to completely fill the stud cavities and shal�be secured to the studs 24 in.OC with staples, nails or screws. CERTAINTEED CORP GUARDIAN FIBERGLASS INC �OHNS MANVILLE INTERNATIONAL INC KNAUF INSULATION GMBH OWENS CORNING HT INC,DN OF OWENS CORNING—Corniny Fiberglas Corp. http://database.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/template/LISEXT/l FRAMEJshowpage.html?name=BXW.... 5/17/2010 BXUV.U305 -Fire Resista.nce Ratings -ANSI/i7L 263 Page 6 of 9 ROCK WOOL MANUFACTURING CO— Delta Board. ROXUL ASIA SDN BND—Acoustical Fire Batts ROXUL INC—Acoustical Fire Batts THERMAFIBER INC—Type SAFB. 5A. Fiber,Sp�* —(Not shown- Not for use with Item 6A)As a�alternate to Batts and Blankets(Item 5)— Spray applied cellulose material.The fiber is applied with water to completely fill the enclosed cavity in accordance with the application instructions supplied with the product. Nominal dry density of 3.0 Ib/ft3.Altemate application method:The fiber is appiied with U.S.Greenfiber LLC Type AD100 hot melt adhesive at a nominal ratio of one part adhesive to 6.6 parts fibe�to compietely fill the enclosed cavity in accordance with the application instructions supplied with the product. Nominal Cry density of 2.5 Ib/ft3. U S GREENFIBER L L C —Cocoon2 Stabilized or Cocoon-FRM (Fire Rated Material) 58. Fibe�,Sprayed* —(Not shown - Not for use with Item 6A)As an altemate to Batts and Blankets(Item 5) and Item 5A-Spray applied cellulose insulation material.The fiber is applied with water to interior surfaces in accordance with the application instructions supplied with the product.Applied to completely�II the enclosed cavity. Minimum dry density of 4.3 pounds per cubic ft. NU-WOOL CO INC—Cellulose Insulation 5C. Bstts and Bl�nkets* —Required fo�use with resilient channels, Item 7, 3 in.thick minerol wool batts, placed to fill interior of wall, attached to the 4 in. face of the studs with staples placed 24 in.OC. THERMAFIBER INC—Type SAFB 5D. Gl�w Fibe�Insulation—(As an altemate to Item 5C) —3 in.thick ylass fiber batts bearing the UL Classification Markiny as to Surface Burning and/or Fre Resistance, placed to fill the interior of the wali, attached to the 4 in.face of the studs with staples placed 24 in. OC.See Batls and Blankets(BKNV or BZ)Z)Categories for names of Classified companies. SE. Batts and Bl�nkets* — (Required for use with Wall and Partition Facings and Accessories,Item 3D) — Glass fiber insulation, nom 3-1/2 in.thick,min.density of 0.80 pcf, with a flame spread of 25 or less and a smoke devefoped of 50 or less,friction-fitted to complately fill the stud cavities.See Batts and Blankets Category(BKNV) for names of manufacturers. 5F. Fiber,Spraqed* —(Optional, Not Shown -Not for use with Item 6, 6A or 66).As an alternate to Batts and Blankets(Item 5)and Item 5A-Spray applied qranulated mineral fiber material.The fiber is applied with water to completely fill the enclosed cavity in accordance with the appiication instrudions supplied with the product.See Fiber,Sprayed(CCAZ). AMERROCK PRODUCTS L P—Rockwool 5G.Fiber,Sprayed* —(Optionai, Not Shown- Not for use with Items6, 6A or 66).As an alternate to Batts and Blankets(Item 5)and Item 5A- Brown Colored Spray applied cellulose flber,The fiber is applied with water to completely fill the enclosed stud cavity in accordance with the application instructiorts supplied with the product. The minimum dry density shall be 4.30 IbsJft3. INTERNATIONAL CELLULOSE CORP—Celbar-RL 6. Sted Fnminy Manben(Option�l,Not Shown)* —Furring channels and Steel Framing Members as described below: http:/ldatabase.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/template/LISEXT/1 FRAME/showpage.html?name=BXUV.... 5/17/ZO l 0 BXUV.U305 -Fire Resistance Ratings -ANSI/IJL 263 Page 7 of 9 a. Purrin�Chaon�Y— Formed of No.25 MSG galv steel. 2-3/8 in.wide by 7/8 in.deep, spaced 24 in.OC perpenditular to studs. Channels secured to studs as described in Item b. Ends of adjoininq channels are overiapped 6 in. and tied together with double strand of No. 18 SWG galv steel wire near each end of overlap.As an alternate,ends of adjoining channels may be overlapped 6 in. and secured toyether with two self-tappinq#6 framing screws, min.7/16 in. lony at the midpoint of the overlap,with one screw on each flange of the channel.Gypsum board attached to furring channels as described in Item 3. b. Sted Framinq M�nbers* — Used to attach furring channels(Item 6a)to studs. qips spaced 48 in.OC. RSIC-1 ciips secured to studs with No.8 x 2-1/2 in.coarse drywall screw throuyh the cerrter grommet. RSIC-V clips secured to studs with No. 8 x 1-iJ2 in.coarse drywall screw through the center hole. Furrinq channels ara friction fitted into clips. PAC INTERNATIONAL INC—Types RSIC-i, RSIC-V. 6A. St�el Framiny Memben(Optional,Not Shown)* — Furriny channels and Steei Framing Members on one side of studs as described below: a. Furriny Chaonds—Formed of No.25 MSG galv steel, spaced 24 in.OC perpendicular to studs.Channels secured to studs as described in Item b. Ends of adjoininy channels are overlapped 6 in.and tied togethe�with double strand of No. 18 SWG galv steel wire near each end of overlap. Batts and Btankets placed in stud cavity as described in Item 5.Two layers of gypsum board attached to furring channels as described in Item 3. b. Sta�Framinp Members* — used to attach furrinq channels(Item 6Aa)to one side of studs only.Clips spaced 48 in. OC., and secured to studs with two No. 8 x 2-1/2 in.coarse drywall screws,one through the hole at each end of the clip. Furring channels are friction fitted into clips. KINETICS NOISE CONTROL INC—Type Isomax. 66. Steel Framin�Memben(OptionN,No!Shown)*—Furring channels and Steel Framing Members as described below: a. Furrinp ChanneY— Formed of No.25 MSG qalv steel. 2-3/8 in.wide by 7/8 in.deep, spaced 24 in. OC perpendicular to studs.Channels secured to studs as described in Item b. Ends of adjoininy channels are overlapped 6 in. and tied together with double strand of No. 18 SWG galv steel wire near each end of overlap.As an alternate, ends of adjoining channets may be o�erlapped 6 in. and secured together with two self-tapping �6 framing screws, min.7/16 in. long at the midpoint of the ove�lap,with one screw on each flange of the channel.Gypsum board attached to furring channets as described in Item. b. Steel Framin�Members* —Used to attach furring channels(Item 66a)to studs.Clips spaced 48 in. OC. Genie ciips secured to studs with No. 8 x 1-1/2 in. coarse drywall screw through the center hole. Furring channels are friction fitted into clips. PLITEQ INC—Type Genie Clip 7. Furrin�Cbannel—Optional - Not Shown- For use on one side of the wall- Resilient channels, 25 MSG galv steel,spaced verttcally 24 in. OC,flange portion screw attached to one side of studs with 1-1/4 in. long diamond shaped point, double lead Phillips head steel screws.When resilient channels are used, insulation, Items 5C or 5D is required. 7A.Sted Framinp M�nben* —Optional - Not Shown- Used as an altemate method to attach resilient channels (Item 7)to one side of studs only. Clips attached at each intersection of the resilient channel and the wood studs (Item 1). Resilient channels are friction fitted into clips, and then clips are secured to the wood stud with min. 1- 3/4 in. long diamond shaped point, double lead Phillips head steel screws through the center hole of the clip and the resilient channel flange. KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CO INC—Type RC Assurance. 8. Caulkiny aed SeNanb— (not shown, optional)A bead of acoustical sealant applied around the partition peNmeter for sound control. http://database.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/template/LISEXT/1 FRAMElshowpage.html?name=BXUV.... 5/17/2010 BXUV.U305 -Fire Resistance Ratings -ANSUtTL 263 Page 8 of 9 9.STC Rating—The STC Rating of the wall assembly is 56 when it is constructed as described by Items 1 through 6, except: A.Item 2, above- Naiiheads ShaH be covered with joint compound. B.Item 2, above-loints As described, shall be covered with fibe�tape and joint compound. C.Item 5, above- Batts and Blankets*The cavities formed by the studs shali be friction ft with R-19 unfaced fiberglass insulation batts measuring 6-1/4 in.thick and 15-1/4 in.wide. D.Item 6,above- Steel Framing Members*Type RSIC-i clips shall be used to attach gypsum board to studs on either side of the wall assembly. E. Item 8, above- Caulking and Sealants(not shown)A bead of acoustical sealant shail be applied around the partition perimeter for sound controi. F.Steel Corner Fasteners(Item 4), Fiber, Sprayed (Items 5A and 5B)and Steel Framing Members(Item 6A), not evaluated as afternatives for obtaining STC roting. 10. Wall and Pertition F�einqs aod Acoe�soria�* — (Optional, Not shown)—Nominal 1/2 in. thick,4 ft wide panels,for optional use as an additional layer on one or both sides of the assembiy. Panels attached in accordance with manufacturer's recomme�dations.When the QR-530 panel is instalied between the wood framing and the UL Classified gypsum board, the required UL Classified gypsum board layer(s) is/are to be installed as indicated as to fastener type and spacing,except that the required fastener length shali be increased by a minimum of 1/2 in. Not evaluated or intended as a substitute for the required IayeKs)of UL Ciassified Gypsum Board. QUIET SOLUTION INC—Type QuietRock QR-530. 11. Cementitaus Back�r Units* —(Optional Item Not Shown- For Use On Face Of i Hr Systems With All 5tandard Items Required) - 1/2 in., 5/8 in., 3/4 in.or 1 in.thick, min. 32 in.wide.-Appiied verticaliy or horizontaliy with vertical joints centered over studs. Fastened to studs and runners with cement board screws of adequate tenqth to penatrate stud by a minimum of 3/8 in.for steel framing members, and a minimum of 3/4 in. for wood framing members spaced a max of 8 in.OC,When 4 ft.wide boards are used, horizonial joints need not be backed by framing. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO—Type PermaBase 12. Non-Be�riny Wall Partition Int�rsection—(Optional) —Two nominal 2 by 4 in.studs or nominal 2 by 6 in. studs nailed together with two 3 in.long lOd naiis spaced a max. 16 in.OC.vertically and fastened to one side of the minimum 2 by 4 in.stud with 3 in, long 30d nails spaced a max. 16 in.OC.vertically.Intersection between partition wood studs to be flush with the 2 by 4 in. studs.The wall partition wood studs are to be framed by with a second 2 by 4 in.wood stud fastened with 3 In. long lOd nails spaced a max. 16 in. OC.vertic�lly. Maximum one non-bearing wall partition intersection per stud cavity.Non-bearing wall partition stud depth shaii be at a minimum equal to the depth of the bearing watl. 13. Mesh Netti�p—(Not shown) -Any thin,woven or non-woven fibrous netting material attached with staples to the outer face of one row of studs to facilitate the installation of the sprayed fiber from the opposite row. '�Bearing the UL Classification Mark Last �pdated on 2010-03-03 Questions? Print this oaae Notice of Disclaimer Page ToQ Copvright c0 2010 Underwriters Laboratories Inc� The appearance of a company's name or product in this database does not in itself assure that products so identified have been manufactured under UL's Follow-Up Service.Only those products bearing the UL Maric should be considered to be Listed and covered under UL's Fallow-Up Service.Always look for the Mar1c on the product. UL permits the reproduct'ron of the material contained in the Online Certification Directory subject to the following conditions: 1.The Guide Information, Designs and/or Listin9s(files) must be presented in their entirety and in a non-misieadi�g manner,without any manipulation http://database.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/template/LISEXT/1 FRAME/showpage.html?name=BXUV.... 5/17/2010 HALOs DESCRIPTION The H5731CAT1 D is designed for insulated ceilings and can be in direct contactwith ceiling insulation.AIRTITE'"' housing design prevents airflow between attic and living areas and saves on both heating and air conditioning costs. The electronic compact fluoresceni dimming ballas[ meets stringent Energy Star requirements including FCC Title 47 CFR part 18 for Consumer equipment.The H5731CAT1 D offers compact fluorescent dimming capability with a residential rated electronic fluorescent dimming ballast.The H5731CAT1D is warranted fortwo years. DESIGN FEATURES A•••Housing •Safetyandguidancesystem G•••Electronic Ballast Single wali aluminum housing. prevents snagging,ensures smooth Models are provided with an Openings ara gasketed for straight nail penetration and allows Energy Star qualified and Title 24 AIRTITE instaliation.Can be used bar hangers to be easily removed if compliant electronic fluorescent in 2"x 8°joist construction. necessary. dimming ballas[. The dimming Housing adjusts for ceilings up •Automatic levelling flange aligns baliast is rated for use with 26W to 1-3/8"thick.AIR-TITE ceiling the housing and lets you hold the Double Twin Tube or Triple Twin gasket included. housing in place with one hand Tube(Triple Twin Tube lamp is 8•••Plaster Frame whiledrivingnails prefercedforbestvisualcomfort). •Housing can be positioned at any The ballastoffers 100%to 15% Includes regressed lodcing screw point within 24"joist span dimming range. Ballast is a high for hanger bars and cutouts for •Score lines allow"tooless" frequency electronic type that crimping hanger bars in position. shortening for 12"joists operates lamps above 40 kHz_ In H5T31CAT1 D C•�•Junction Box • Bar hangers may be repositioned 90° addition the ballast is thermally •Listed for through branch • Bar hangers do not need to be protected,and end of life feature removed from frame for shartening shuts down the ballast upon lamp „ circuit wiring •inte ral T-bar cli sna onto T-bars S Instdat�d Giling • Positioned to accommodate 9 P � failurewith auto restart to eliminate straight conduit runs -no additional clips required need to reset power after lamp AIR-TITETM • Seven1l2"tradssizeconduit E•••Socket replacement R�c�ssed Housing knodcouts with true pry-out G24q�/GX24-3 socket ior one 26W La bel s 2s Watt s�ats DTT'-Double Twin Tube(Quad)or 26W .cUL Listed for Damp Location • Slids-N-Side'"' connectors T7T-Triple Twin Tube 4 pin lamp. •cUL Listed wet location with select ��t Fluonsc�nt allow non-metallic sheathed *DTT lamp rtot listed for use with al! trims cable to be installed without trims.See trims on page 2 •cUL Listed for Direct Corrtact with with Dimfltin9 Ballast toolsandwithoutremoving F•••lamp Insulationandcombustible — knodcouts.Accepts a wider material range of non-metallic sheathed Compact Fluorescent lamp(by •cUL Listed for feed through 5" TRI MS cable—the standard cable others�. types used in lighting for both 26 Watt Lamp Generic Designations Compliance FOR USE IN U.S.andCanada. DTT-DoubleTwinTube�tQuadl(CFQ) .StateofCaliforniaTitle24High INSULATED CEILINGS -Allowswiringconnedionstobe •CFQ28W/G24q EfficacyLuminaire made outside the junction box 2700K,3000K,3500K,4100K •Washington State Energy Code -Simplyinsertthecabledirectly �26WD7TIampnotfistedforuse .NewYorkStateEnergy FOR OIRECT CONTACT into the trap after connections with all frims.See trims ort page 2. Conservation Construction Code W ITH I NSU LATION are made TTT-Triple Twin Tube(CFTR) •International Energy -Accommodatesthefollowing •CFTR26W/GX24q Conservation Code Lamp/Ballast Energy Data standard non-metallic sheathed 2700K,3000K,3500K,4100K •Energy Star Qualified cable types: •Up to 12,000 hour rated average life •Certified AIR-T1TE under ASTM- Rated Lamp Watts:26W (US}�74l2,#14/3,�722,#12/3 •8z CRI reted lamps provide EP83 Voltage:120V,60Hz (Canada) #14J2,#14/3,#12l2 excellent color and high visual Input Current,26W:0.24 Amps comfort. Input(Full)Power(ANSI Watts), D•••Bar Hangers •Colortemperature(warmtocooi) 26WIamp:28Watts BarHan erFeaturesinclude• optionsoffer2700Kwarm,3000K, Ballastqualifications: g • 3500K medium-warm and 4100K Power.720V,60Hz •Pre-installed nail easily installs cool incandescent-like light Dimming Range:700%-15�0 in regular lumber,engineered EMI:FCC Trtle 47 CFR Part 18 lumbar and laminated beams Consumer compliant for EMI (conducted&radiated) Sound rating:A Power Factor:9890 Ballast Factor.0.80!0.15 E ........................ ........... THD:2090 TaP V1eW Min.Starting Temp:50°F/70°C F ...................... ....... ............... C „ ,� ,� A ...................... � � ,� � � � �� g...........o....... � � �� G [ 7 tn• , � : � � �; � ... � I791mm1 � i „ � � � : � � � . . . � �� ° 17 m] O ........,... � � �� ;� O p�.,�� : � � �� ;� o a � _'^"I Fp.. D ... . p- ;1 � -O � Oo -� 00 �y� "a:' . 1/2"I13mm] //�9� 10 3i8' VY ! � 51/2" � I264mm1 [140mm] Ordering information and 2 year warranty information on reverse � �{ COOPER LIGHTING AD'ro�� H6731CAT1D TRIMS ORDERING INFORMATION SAMPIE NUMBER: H5731CATfD-5027SC Order housing,trim and acceesories separately. Housing Trims Accessories H5731CAT1D=Insulated ceiling,26W RFFI F�,Q� dimming compact n q�,N;�,yyhfrsTrim Ri�and Tonion GA-ATH5-6pK=AIR-TITE Finished housincent Air-Tite �y,� CeilingGasket Kit 9 ��./ 281N D1T or 7TT compact fluoresce� For air tight seal around the aperture 50278C=Specular Ciear after ceiling is installed. 5021H=FIaze Reflector 6 ieces `�7 5027HC Residential Gold p. OD: &3/8"�165mm) gpp�g Matal Baffle with White Trim Ring a�Tonion 2 YEAR L�f1�TED WARRANTY ReCOmmended Wall Dimmer Springc Energy Star Labeled Rece�ed Lighting The H5731CAT1 D is rated for use with �►DT�or TTT compact fluorescent Cooper Lighting(The Campany►warrarrts this standard dimmers,however for best ��3=81ack BafNe produu(°the produc[^)against deFec[s in material 9Ti573T�&ack Baffle with Torsion Spririgs or workmanship for a period aF two years from date perfoRnanCe these quallty lighting products 9ii513YVFiT=YYhi[e Baffle of original purchase,and agrees to repair or,attha are reoommended for use with fluorescent g��g BiT57SVNiTT�White Bafife with Torsian company's option,replace a defective product dimmers rated for"Mark 10Uw"(also Springs without charge tor either replacemem par�s or labor f6ferred to as"Mark X°},by AdvancB. �D: 63B°(165mmM during suchtime.This does no[indude la6orto remove or install fi#ures. Coilex Baffle with Whita Trim R�q and Torsion This wdrtanty is extended only to the original For compatible Lution fluorescent wall Springs purchaser af the producx.A purchasa�s receipt or dimmers go to www.lutron.com/advance 28W D7T or 7TT compact fluorescertt aher proof af date of original purchase acceptable end refe�to the flsting for"Mark X"dimme�s � `��=�ack BaHle,White Trim Ring to the Company is required beFore wamarny 5016W=White Baffle,White Trim Ring performance shall be rendered. r,�076 OD: 6318"�165mm) Thiswamantyonlycoversproducttailuredueto For compatible Leviton fluorescent wall defeds in materials orworkmanship which oca,rs dimmers go to httpJ/WWW.levi[on.cOm in nortnal use.k does not cover tl�e bulb or falure >Llghting CoMrols>ReSidential>Dimmers Frostad Glus Dome Shower LIgM witl�Whke �{produc[caused by acciderrt,misuse,abuse,lack end browSe fOr"Mar1C 70�°dlmme�s,or LENS Trim Fitp md Toraion Sprinps af reasonable care,alteration,or faulty insqliation, ZBW TTT compact fluorescerR only Call Leviton Tech Line at 1$00-824-3005 end subjectingthe produdto arry but the�acified askfo�"MarklOm"walidimmers � ��rLight-WhiteTrimRing �y��rfailurenotresunin 5054SN�Shawer Light-Satin Nickel Trim electrical service or a g Ring from deFects in materials orwarlmianship,Damag¢ For a list of other manufacturers of"Mark � ��er Light-Amique CopperTrim tothe product caused by separately purchased,non- 70m"com tiblefluorescentdimmers oto � R��9 ComparrysuppiiedcomporrerKSOrbulbs,and � 9 5054TBZS=Shower Light-Tuscan Bror¢e Trim corrosion ar discoloration of componerKS are no[ the Advance Mark 7OB website at: q�� coverea by this warwmy. 9 There are na express warranties except as desaibed httpJ/www.advancetransformer.com/produc OD: 6-3�8°�165mm) above. ts/fluorescent-electroniajspTpbid�7 and THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE i�OR select `Mark 7 Ot�Powerline Dimming A��o� INqDENTAL,SPECwL OR CONSEQUENTIAL ga��' � Whke Tr'vn Ri�g and Torsbn Springs DAMAGES RESUlT1NG FROM THE USE OF THE ZBW 1TT eompact fluoreseent onty PRODUCT OR ARISMG OUT OF ANY BREAqi OF 505tPS=Shower Light THIS WARRANTY.ALL IMpL1ED WARRAN'IIES,IF y051 OD: 63J8"(165mm) ANY,INCLUDING IMPLIED WARRANTS OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FlTNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE,ARE UMrtED IN Fresnei Lans Shower Lightwkh Refleetnr, DURATION TO THE OURATION OFTHIS EXPRESS � WhltaTrim Ring and Torsion��9 WARRANTY. Some states do rrot allowthe 0 26W TTT compad fluorescertt onty exolusian or limita[ion af incidental or consequentiai 9ii55Y=Shower Light damages,or limitations on how long an implied OD: 63I8"(165mm) warrarny lasts,so the above exclusions ar BiT55z IimRations may not apply to you. Wall Wash witli Ba1fle,Nfhite Trlm Rng and No othw warranty,xrtitten or verbel,is authorized W�L W� Torston Sprfrgs bY the Company.This warramy gives you specfic 28W 1lT CompaCt fluofe8Celrt only ��9�.and you mey also have other rights � 5090P=Wal�Wash with Black Baffle which vary from sta6e ta state. � 5630W=Wal1 Wash with White Baifle To obtain warramy aervice,Please wrke to Cooper OD: 6-38"(165mm) UgMing.1121 Highvray 74 Sauth,Peachtree City Georgia 302fi9.Enclose product model number and `�0 proWems you are e�cperiencing,along with address and telephone number.You v�nll then be comacted wkh a solution or a Retum Gaods Authorization number and full irutructions frn retuming the produQ.All retumed products must be accompanied by a Re[um Goads Authorization Number issued by the Comparry and must be Standard re[urned freight prepeid.My product received �esidential ��a Retum Goods Authoraation Number from wiring.120V, the Companywill be refused. Cooper Lighting is not responsi We for merchardise 60H2(2 wi�9 damaged in trensR.Repaired or replaced products plusground). shalibesubjecttothetertnsofthiswarrerrryand are inspecOed when packed.EvideM or concealed Halo damage that is made in transit should be reported at H2731CAT7 D Dimme�rated for Mark 700 n once to the wrrier making the delivery and a claim fluorescent(by others►.One lJ fiied with them. housings with dimmer can control muftiple dimming ballast fiMUres.Consult ins[ructions Heb.AIR-TTTE,GOT NAILI,Slide�l$ide,Pasa.�•}Thru are valuable IflCIUd2d Wlth dIRIT@i. tredemerks of Cooper Indushies in the Uniled Sintes a�M o[her couMries. � You are not permil[ed to use the Cooper Trademarl�without the proper written m'ne(rt of Cooper IrMustries. Pbta:Spec'rficetians and Dimereio�wbjeQ to chaige wi[hout notice. V�[OUf YY�SHB i�YYW W.00O�IB�II9f1�f10.MR1 Cus[omer Firs[CeMer 1127 Highwey 74 South Peachtree Ciry,GA 30269 770,486,4800 FAX T70 486.4801 �Lighting Cooper Lighting 5925 McLaughlin Rd.Mississauga,Orrtario,Canada L5R 168 9Q5.507.4000 FAX 905.566.7049 Job Name:�11��u��na,��+�.i� �. t' Job Address: GEor�39S'Fa��$� �� ` Permit Na:_.�( ��j~fJO?� SPEGIAL ENSPECTtO1V Ah}D T�3TfNG AGREEMEN7 (To appitcants of prajects repuEring Sponia(Inspeotion or Testing per Section 4704 of tho IBG} l The owner or hisfher repcesentattve, cxi the advice af the design�rofessianal In respansE6le charge.shel( complete, seal, sign and suhmit a eopp af the Special tnspection Agreament artd Structurai Tests Sched�ed to Ehe Town oE Vait for revlew and approvaL Sfgnatures are requfred on both peges; photocopied or faxed signatures are aQeeptable. The owner and f�islher gen� mMtacbor, �there appiicab[e, shaq afso adcnowledge fF►e €oQwvirtg condiiia�s appltccab[e to Special Inspaction Testinq: 1. Contrector is responsible for proper nuti�catian to the Irtspection or Tes#ing agency for items iisted.(Page 1j (IBC'17Q4} 2. Only fhe testing laboratory ehautd lafce s�npfes and transport tttem to thetr Jaboratory. 3. Coples af al{laboratory repo�ts and inspections are to be sent direcEly to the Tow�of Vai!by the Festlng agency an a weekly basis. 4. Inspectiors ageney fo sulatrtit narnes arM quafffroetions of on-site speclai inspectors Eo the Town of lfail for review and approval.(Page 2j 5. The spociai ir�sped�is rosportsbte fo imcnediatety nolify the Town of Vaii Build�ng QffiaaF in wtiting of anyr eonceFns andla prob(err►s enacuMered. 6. it is the responsibtpty af the cnnfracf� tcx review the Town of V�t approved pidns !or addfEbnat inspectEor�or 3esting requirometrts that�nay be noted, A pre-cpnstrud�n confer�rtce at the Job sife is recommended ta review spsaal inspection procadures. 7. The speciAl inspector Sh�l)t�se onty d�e Taan!n d Vai!approved c4rawinga 8. Alt s}�ecial insPectian fietd reposts m�f be (eft on si�e for review by the Towrt of Vail staff prior to reqt�red inspedions or re-tnspecUons. 6EFURE OCCUPANCY Wltl� �C�A�N'['ED: The s�cia!inspection agency shall submit a sigrted and sealed statement lhaf a!{ttems requiring testi�and inspection were fuifiiled and reporied, Thnse it�►s not kested and/or fr�apected shaU be no 9n this datement. A copy of fhe statement shail be mairrtained at the job site far the Bullding lnspeclo� eview prior to final irtspection. , Acknowiedg . Owner. � � .,._L.._� �� Pdo Narnz Date Spd�i�rtspection v Agency: C G J�� /�— vu .S-��10 S(gnature Print Name 0 te Projecct �. /` —c�'` `� � ArchlEng: _, � ! nawte Pnnt Na a Datt Contractor: J w g,,, M o��c� � �IU igeature . Print Name Date _ _ � 3 , � . �R�N0��9I� � SPECfAL tNSPEC1lOtH AfVb TE9TINO 3CHEDULE E��G,��y Project Nama: �t� � � �Pr-�. permit# "L�Z� ��Frt��"OwnePa Neme: ✓�c� �K� $'!�'�d Testlng[napecf(ort Panc a.;,,e oa�e Agency, Testing fnspectian sgn.wra �urrame �arc HereBy certifiea thef the TesUngtinspncNan Agenc}r named ebave�as been engaped to pertorm struct�ral tests and inspections during consEtuction as checked below,to saUsfy all applteah�e partions af the 8ut�ding Code. � PrEor to finai inspeotlon,the(napedia►t�rtey shel(subrr�a statement that a1�ems of designated work perfoimed 6 were reported. Any Rems checked but not tealed or inspected wili be no�d and exp(ained. Whertaver any des�xted @ams on fhe liet are roady for samplk� tesling, ar inapecElan, tt shell be 1he respamibildy of the oonttactor to give timely notlCe to!he inspec6on agency sa�thaE ths required services mey be pertormed. RQNF�RClN�37EB.: UkDERF+INMNG: FonsBe&8end,one a!per hes!pv,,,,�,fone _ Tertporery rmsnent Inspedion oE P(se�nanf _ Inspee of Steel Fabricatian � Inspedion oEtNelding .._ � on oP Reinforcing&Forrv ,_,.,, Epoxy , t Ilon of Camxata PYcement ' of Tie6adcs MASONRYc ^ Prelim.Ac ce Tests(Masanry Ur�s,WaN Pdcros) � SOtL NAILS: ,_._„_ Subss Tecfs(Mort�r,Groul,Fkid Wst Prisms) •• Tert�orary Shoring _,_, Ina n of Placement and Giouting Perma4ent Wail CDNCFES�SHOTGf�ETE GROUTANDAIORTAR: STR11G'R1RAI.STEEI,; Cmpele Graut _ SampN 8 Tast(U pecific memhers hefow) aek ._. Shap Iden &Wetding Mspection of�p�al�a _ Shop Ultr fnspection ._____ ShoP raphY Tw Pm�ci _ Fi�d Id�g Inaped'an a Plont�pa�on - a�ng(mpeWan E� id Ulrasonk InspedEon �t P� � Fkid Radtography cwnweato�r•m _. hrecalaedcwewmy�speouon Caa FIREPR : P �� specEion&P(acemant 9 ' Bsrs Yeid CMck SpILS: NrChecrt _ Acceptance T �`�^��'�`� _ MokWre- SjlyOatermindGon RBC CO ET : �_ Ftekl Ily . _ RetnforcinQ T ' D FieB _ Inspet�lon o[ infa�ittg Placement �p Foandation ^ Terldon 7e i Ins ofTartdon Pbcemeett STRUCTURql,WOOD; ._ los on ofConea�ete Pktoement _� fnspeolipn o d�tton _ in otCa�creteBatchM4 _,�,,,_ Inspeet' oTTnusJOGitFSbrlcatlon � spectton oF panef AttaeNment 6 tnserts - Ss &Teet Components Compression 7ests ecEion of Giu lam Fabr�atlon lnspectdon of&tressi�l�ranstef _ SMOKE CONTROL: PILiNG,CA(SSONS GAPS,TIES: _ l�specN of Relnforeing Ptecsment ,_,_, BPECIAI.CASES: __�__ ins n aFConcrele Pla�ament _ !n ectbn of Concrefe Betctiing SPEGtAl1NSP ON; S c Resistance Specflyolher�ests,lnapecbonsorspedaiirrslruoliw�sreq�ired adRequiremeMs _4_ � . ��xoFV� � REPORT OF SPECIAL INSPECTtONS Project: Y�`wr�~�� -�.'`-'a� �- Permit Number: D �'��8 � � �b S� 39S' �o�.�s} 4�_ r Project Location: � Owner �D�-S"� GC. ��J�r�KZa' L.(iC a . � Address �� 20 (,¢�E��P�t►f�1�(-� City: ��c+�5 Zip: �Og1�27�3 � i� Reglstered Design Professional M Q ��/��/�L/ �l �_/� �,QS �`G , In Responsible Charge: ! " � �, . ��,-• ✓�N�I'� � � Address: �7 O� ti✓�P S� �r�� O City: l`�'�/�� State:� Zip: �202 �hone: 3a 3 �Z� �f�7 FaX:?�� 23 � a Z ��: c�;�rr�!/ � �n�rr-Q�-��( c��.. This Report of Special tnspe�tions attached is submitted as a condition from pertnit issuance in accordanoe with Section 17Q4 Intemational Bulding Code. It includes a Schedule of Special Inspectian Services applicable to the above referenced project as well as the identiiy of the indviduals,agencies, or firms intended to be retained for conducting these inspections. The Speeial Inspector(s)shall keep reco�ds of all inspections and shall furntsh interim inspection reports to the registe.�ed design professional in responsible charge at a frequency �reed upon by the pertnit applicant and building official prior to the staR of work. Discrepancies shall be brought to the immediate aftentivn of the contractor and design professional in responsible charge for care�6on. If the discrepancies are not corrected, the dis ancies shaA be brought to the attention of the building official by the registered design professi nal in responsible charge prior to the completion of that phase of wo�lc. A Fi�al Report of Special Inspections shall be submitted by the design professional in responsible charge to the building officiat at the cancluslon of the project and before a certificate of oocupancy will be issued. Prepared by: :_ C '�l C� (� �?e�� ` , : T or P�int N � , ' r Stg lwe � t � � 1� � � �1�" � .�� ... ..��.� Date �. ' ' . / .� � t�'y!.. Preparer's Sea� ��nature Required Yo be fllted out by the jurisdicUon and retumed to applicant Building Off�cial's Acceptance of Specia[Inspections Frequency af Interim reports: Monthly Bi-Monthly Upon Completion Per Attached Schedule Signature Date Permit Number -�o- . . �� , �� ,� ��, � _ ,�,�� . ��: � r�t�f:�otnii��i "��la men�•� :. � � F z �. ° �p �"��t �?� r_ s�- �-s�` � � ��- < =�'2; �� ,`� �'�5 South �r�tage �� g �� .� '�,�-,�� . '�� `. 1�a' ��'�� r3 - i: '�"�: �� - �� ; �,'�} � �' �t 5.e�:. a . 'Y��` R �::�_^_ ,�,�, �`� '� ;i �'��` ;`f ` #� a�'� �''� �c "t� i� � �"1�, .,�#-�_ -; , � , *� , , �:_ .:^{, �j.±°,`� � f=. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Separate permits are required for electrical, plumbing, mechanical,fireplace, etc. Project Street Address: � �� Office Use: �� O�O/�'�i OI 3�5,, .� ,r�'o�� Project#: lJl,/ 1 �•- (Nu ber) (Street) (Suite#► DRB#: Building/Complex Name: �� Building Permit#: ��l 1� v" '� Lot#:�Block� Subdivision: V '\� Contractor Infortnati n: � A � Company: � � 1�� J�SD� • .�RC� > e � Company Address:�OZ�S� � _ Detailed Scope and Location of Wor1c: � City: K1�6LL State:�Zip: 1� �� ;_ �CNV—I�YL�— �'`� � ContactName: ��i._ ��4� ( S'�D� — W -�f � �5✓�Z�O v r' Contact Phone: ��D � L-�4 S`- �'�C't �( _ �`��5��''"`'1 �`�'1.t!!��2�- _ (use additional sheet if ne ssary) E-Mail l �O �-KFL��D�.L=ClJ�-- , Work Class: Town of ail Con ct Reg' trati ' � d New(�Q Addition O Remodel O Repair O Other O X � Work Type Contractor Signature(required) Interior O Exterior O Both(� Property Info a�Uon o��a�-�� 3�d/� Type of Building: � q �/,q.��U,l�,,q,Q,8 �;��,�3 Single-Family( ) Duplex(� Multi-Family( ) Parcel#: ��, � ��- �- (For parcel�,contact Eagle County Assessors Office at 97Q 328-86au or Commercial O Othe�O visit www.eaglecounty.us/patie) Tenant Name: 'µ Does a Fire Alarm Exist? Yes( ) No( �c) '� � � ��— Monitored Alarm? Yes( ) No( �) Owner Name: ��1� � � `� Does a Sprinkler System Exist? Yes O No( � #&Type of Existing Fireplaces: Gas Apptiances Valuations(Labor&Materials) Gas Log Wood/Pellet Wood Buming i� $ "� , �dd} n�`� Building: #&Type of Proposed Fireplaces:Gas Appliances�_ Plumbing: $ � �� dd � Gas Log� Wood/Pellet Wood Buming � Electrical: $ Q 1b DOD '� �_�,oQ� r Date Received: Mechanical: (induding fireplace) $ � � � � R n � Total: $ �b ' D � APR 2 3 2010 TOWN OF VAIL �'-' -10 ************************�*********************r***��***********************s**************** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement ***********��*****��********************************��r��**********************��*�++*�*** Statement Number: R100000339 Amount: $9, 886.00 04/23/201003 :28 PM Payment Method: Check Init: JLE Notation: 3049 TRIUMPH DEVELOPMENT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B10-0078 Type: NEW (SFR,P/S,DUP) PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-1301-9 Site Address: 375 FOREST RD VAIL Location: Total Fees: $97,497.61 This Payment: $9, 886.00 Total ALL Pmts: $9,886.00 Balance: $87,611.61 *s************+�****+*+*************************s*******************�*******s******ss******* ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------------- ------------------------------ ------------ BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES .64 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 9,885.36 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- �: R�o,AM NA,E E�as ON,N 395/405 Forest Rd. Duplex Construction Logistic Plan April 20th, 2010 This project consists of a demolition of an existing single family home and construction of a new duplex. The existing home has been tested for asbestos and has tested positive in vinyl composite flooring in the bathrooms on three levels. A state asbestos abatement permit has been submitted and the owner has retained DS Consultants, Inc. and Rocky Mountain Abatement to abate this asbestos containing material, air quality testing and issuance of a clearance report. This work is schedule to take place Apri127`h—April 29`h, 2010. The fire department will then conduct training in this facility while the state demolition permit is being processed. Building demolition is schedule to commence in the first or second week of April,pending the issuance of a building pemut. Upon completion of the demolition, excavation will begin. Due to the site conditions, an earth retention shoring system will be installed and designed by a licensed engineer. Although the type of shoring has not been selected(soil nail shotcrete vs. micropiles),no components of the shoring system will cross the property lines or existing utility easements. A combination of permanent and temporary shoring will be utilized. There will be an excess amount of excavated material that will be trucked from the site and properly disposed of. Roughly 1,000 cy of excavated material will be stored on site and used for backfill. The building completion is anticipated for August of 2011. , The project will be enclosed in a 4' green construction fence with a double gate at the entry. A silt fence will be installed per the Civil engineers plan and any inlets will be protected. A dumpster for construction debris and a wood only container will be staged by the entry to the project. Wood debris will either be recycled or ground on site and used for mud control. A bear proof container for food trash and 2 temporary facilities will also be located near the entrance. A small field trailer will be staged on site upon completion of backfill. Co-mingled (glass, aluminum, tin&plastic)recycling container, cardboard and office paper will be collected in the job trailer and recycled. A right-of-way permit will be submitted to the town for construction parking along Forest Road, staging of materials in the right-of-way and any required road cuts for utility extension. Project Contact for R.A.Nelson Lee Dorothy Project Superintendent ldorothy(a�ranelson.com (970) 949-5152 (office) (970) 949-4379 (fax) Asbestos Inspection and Sampling Report � 375 Forest Rd, Vail, Colorado 81657 rj�d�0�1� Presented to: � � � � D Mr. Mike Foster APR 2 3 2010 Triumph Development 74 Willow Rd TOWN OF VAIL Vail, CO 81657 ��wr� of Vail Performed&Prepared by: � CoPY �� Mr. Steve Shurtliff DS Consulting, Inc. � PO Box 6864 Avon,CO 81620 (303) 378-1544 Project Details: DSC Project#: 2006 Conducted: March 2, 2010 � � Consulting EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On May 2, 2010, Mr.Steve Shurtliff of DS Consulting, Inc. (DSC) performed a full building inspection and � asbestos sampling at 375 Forest Rd,Vail, Colorado,in order bo identify potentially hazardous friable and non-frlable asbestos-containing materials (ACN� within the above-referenced, single-family residence scheduled for demolition. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environmen�s (CDPHE) Regulation 8,Part B defines an asbesGvs-containing material(ACM)as a maberial containing more than 1aYo asbestos. Mr. Shurtliff performed asbestos bulk-sampling of drywall (surfacing materials), resilient Roor tile (miscellaneous material�, vinyl ftooring (miscellaneous material), ceiling tile (miscellaneous material), and perlitic plaster(miscellaneous material)in a total of thirty-three(33)locations within the main level, lower level, and upper level of the residence (see Appendix A for sample loattions). All thirty-three (33) bulk samples were analyzed by Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. (NVLAP #101896) with four (4) laboratory results of resilient Roor tile/mastic and vinyl flaoring being positive far asbestos between 8% and 2096 Chrysotile(see Apperedrx C for laborartory resvlts�. Multiple samples of drywall (surFacing material) were ititially analyzed and repoited as cantaining a trace amount of Chrysotile asbestos ai�er visual estimations; however, after these samples were re- analyzed using the gaint count method� the samples reported to contain less than 196 asbestos and are not considered asbestos-cantaining materials (ACM). These drywall samples do contain asbestos and should be treated as such. OSHA guidelines for worker protection should be followed when disturbing this material. The following sampled materials were found to contain asbestos greater than 145(ACM): Ff01-01 Resilient Lower Level Miscellaneous Non- +�_1,200ftz Go«i �-10% Floor lile F1oor Material Friable ��e �nyl Lower Level Miscellaneous Friable +/-60ftz �� 20% VFOl-Ol ��ng gathroom Material Chrysotile Main Level 209�0 VF02-Ol �IIyl Master M�Mat�n� Friable +/-75ftz Good �� Flooring otile Bathroom Vinyl Upper Level Miscellaneous Friable +/-100ftz �� 20% VF03-01 Flooring Bathroom Material Chrysotile 'Quantities are appm�rimations and subject to field verification. � 2 PROJECT OVERVIEW � I. Introduction A full building inspection and bulk sampling for ACM was conducted at 375 Forest Rd,Vail, Colorado,by Mr.Shurdiff on May 2, 2010,at the request of Mr. Mike Foster with Triumph Develapment Mr. Shurtliff is a Colorado State Certified Building Inspector, having EPA Accreditation #15413 (see Appendix B for certif�cate�. The purpose of ffie inspection was to identify, sample and assess potentially hazardous friable and non-friable ACM within the residence. Il. Structural Design The structure is a wood-framed,multi-level,single-family residence. IIL Sampling and Analyttcal Procedures The inspection, assessment and sampling were conducted by an EPA and AHERA accredited Building Inspector qualified by e�erience, educadon and training in the re�cognition of potential ACM and approved bulk-sampling techniques. The asbestos bulk sampling was conducted on suspect ACM with a limited number of bulk samples being collected within the residence. The inspection,assessment and sampling were performed in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency/AHERA recommended procedures. These procedures call for the visual inspeclion of the area of concern and the collection and analysis of representative bulk samples of suspect material. Some minor destrucdve sampling was conducted. Walls, columns and perimeter pipe chases were not � broken into in order to locate and quantify suspect ACM. It should be noted that additional ACM might be located in these and other inaccessible areas. Random bulk-samples, representative of the suspect asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM� of each homogeneous area (HA�. were coIlected according to the guidelines published as Environmental Protecdon Agency(EPA) Final Rule: Tide I! of the To�c Substances Control Act(TSCA), 15 USC,Sections 2641 through 2654 and in compliance with 40 CFR, Part 763. Representatrve sampling is based on the following criteria: 1. The distribution of the suspect material throughout the HA. 2. The suspect material's physical characteristics and application. 3. Random sampling patterns determined for each HA. Suspect materials sampled and analyzed should be considered to be representative of materials in each HA if they exhibit similar physical characteristics and the applicatian of the sampled material can be correlated to the application of un-sampled material. Bulk-samples collected were analyzed utilizing the EPA's Method far the Determination of Asb�sGvs in Bulk Buildi� Mateerials (EPA 600/R/116, July, 1993) and the McCrone Research Institute's The Asb�stos Particle Atlas as methods references. Analysis of the bulk samples was performed on the"date reported,"as listed in the bulk-sample analysis report � 3 IV. Notes on Report Format Suspect materials alike in appearance and application were sampled as HAs. Suspect maberials were � divided inta three classifications: 1. SurfacinRg Ma�erial:sprayed or troweled onto structural building member. 2. Thermal System Insulation('T'SI):any type of pipe,boiler,tank,or duct insuiation. 3. Miscelianeaus Material: other suspect materials. floor tile, sheet vinyl/linoleum. ceiling tiles, insulation,and finishing materials. Condition assessments were performed by the accredited inspector at the time of inspection Conditfon assessments are listed in the foAowing section. Ratings of "good," °damaged," and "significantly damaged"are meant to indicate the overall condidon af the materiaL A material in "good" condition has no visible damage or deterioration, or showing only very limfted damage or deterioration A material in"damaged"condition has the following characteristics: The surface is crumbling,blistered, water-stained, gouged, marred or otherwise abraded over less than one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed (one-quarter if the damage is localized�. Accumulation of powder,dust or debris similar in appearance to the suspect materlai on surFaces beneath the material can be used as confirmatory evidence. A material in"significandy damaged"condition has one or more of the following characteristics: • The surface is crumbling or blistered over at least one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed (one-quarter if the damage is localized). � • One-tenth (ane-quarter, if localized) of the material is hanging from the surface, deteriorated, or showing adhesive failure. • Water stains, gouges, or man are over at least one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed (one-quarter if the damage is localized). Accumulation of powder, dust or debris similar in appearance bo the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as confirmatory evidence. Response-action recommendations for asbestos-containing HAs are listed in the section VII. Recommendations may be for more than one HA, if materials are alike. Recommendations are either "general" or "immediate." An immediate recommendation indicabes the presence of asbestos greater than 196 within the bulk sample,or a bulk-sample in the same HA,and should be addressed accordingly. A general recommendation indicates asbestos does not exist greater than 1aXn within the bulk-sample, or a bulk sample in the same HA, and no further abatement activities are required for removal of the material. Any sample reporting a "TRACE" amount of asbestos must be considered to be positive for asbestos greater than 196 unless it is analyzed by the point-count method to be less than 19�6. V. Inspector Comments Chrysotile asbestos was identified during the bulk-sampling conducted at 375 Forest Rd�Vail, Colorado. A total of thirty-three (33) bulk-samples were collected from the above-referenced residence. Four (4) bulk samples tested positive(greater than 1°�0)for asbestos. ■ Asbestos was identified in the lower level resilient floor tile and mastic (miscellaneous material) � sample FTOl-01 at 10�6 Chrysotile in the black mastic and 8%in the tan tile 4 ■ Asbestos was identified in the lower level bathroom vinyl flooring (miscellaneous material) sample VFOl-01 at 209�6 Chrysotile � ■ Asbestos was identified in the main level master bathroom vinyl flooring(miscellaneous material) sample VF02-01 at 2096 Chrysotile ■ Asbestos was identified in the upper level bathroom vinyl flooring (miscellaneous material) sample VF03-01 at 2096 Chrysotile VI. Homogeneous Area Descriptlons The following section contains sampled HA descriptions and sample locatlons. Percent-asbestos content for each sample indicated can vary depending an sample locaUons, homogeneity of the materials, and type of applicatioa The following samples were collected from the single family residence at 375 Forest Rd, Vail, Colarado, on May 2, 2010. The quantides are approximations and are subject to field veri8cation: � � � Sample#: DW01-01 Sample#: DW01-02 Sample Description: Drywall Sample D�iption: Drywall Sampte Location: Main Level Dining Room Wall Sample Location: Main Level Living Roam Wall Materiat Classiftcation: Surfacing Material Material Classification: Surfacing Material Ma�erial QucrRtity: <1,OOORZ Material Quantity: <1,OOOft2 � Material Condition: Good Material Condidon: Good Physical Description(layers): White compound Physical Descrfption(tayers): White tape;Whibe w/white paint;White tape;White joint compound; joint compound;White compaund w/white pain� Tan white d 1 Tan wlute AsbesGos Content(la,y�ers): Non-detec�Non-detec� AsbesG�s CoRtent(layers): Nan-detec�Non-detec� <0.2596 Ch tile;Non-detect Non-detec�Nan-detect RecommendatioRS: ��-See Section VII Recommeredations: CENCRAL-See Section V[I � 5 � � 1 Sample#: DW01-03 Sample#: DW02-01 � Sample D�scription: Drywall Sample Description: Drywall Sampte Location: Main Level Living Room Wall Sample Location: Lower Level Family Room Wall Material Classification: SurFacing Material Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Quantity: <1,QOOft2 Material Quantity: >1,OOOft2 Material Condition: Good Muterial Condition: Good Physical Descript[on(layers): White texture physical D�ption(layers): White joint w/white paint;Tan/white drywaIl w/cream paint compound;White tape;White compound w/white 'n�Tan white d ll Asbestos Content(layers): Non-detec�Non-detect ��t°s Content(layers): Nan-detect;Non-detect; Non-detec�Non-detect Recommendations: G N -See Section VII Recommendvtion� GENE -See Section VII � � i Sample#; DW02-02 Sample#: DW02-03 Sample Descriptiore: Drywall Sample Descripdon: Drywall � Sample Location: Lawer Level Family Room Wall Sample Location: Lower Level Bedroom Wall Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Classifiaation: Surfacing Material Material Quantity: >1,OOOft2 Material Quantity: >1.00Ott2 Material Condidon: Good Material Conditiore: Good Physicat Description(layers): White joint Physical Descriptiore(layers): White joint campound;White compound w/white painfi compound;Whibe tape;White compound w/white White e;Tan white 'n�Tan white d 1 Asbestos Centent(layers): Non-detec�Non-detec� Asbestos Content(layers): Non-detect;Non-detect; Non-detec�Non-detect <0.25% odle;Non-detect Recommendations: GENERAL-See Sectian Vll Recommendations: GENE�L'See Secti°n VII �I 6 i Sample#: DW02-04 Sample#: DW02-05 � Sample Description: Drywall Sample Description: Drywall Sumple Lvcation: I�ower Level Bathroom Wall Sample Location: Lower Level Bathroom Wall Ma�erial Classification: Sur[acing Material Material Classifrcation: Surfacing Material Material Quantity: >1,�Oft2 Material Quantity: >1,OOOft2 Mat�erial Condition: Good Mat�erial Condidon: Good Physical D�cription(layers): White joint Physical Description(layers): White compound; compound;White tape;White compound w/white Tan/white diywall • fi Tan white d Asbestos Content(layers): Non-detec�Non-detect '��DS Content(la,y�ers): Non-detect;Non-detec� Non-detec�Non-detect Recommendations: GEN -See Secdon VlI Recommendatiorrs: G NE -See Secdon VII � Sample#: DW03-01 Sample#: DW03-02 Sample Description: Drywall Sample Description: Drywail � Sample Location: Main Level Master Bathroam Samp/e Location: Main LQVeI Master Bathroom Closet Wall QO�t W� Material Classifrcation: Surfacing Material Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Quantity: +/-75ft2 Mat�erial Quantity: +/-75ftz MaGerial Condition: Good Materiat Condition: Good Physical Description(layers): White compound physical Description(layers): White campound w/cream pain�Multi-calared wall coverin� W�Wh��nt;Tan/white drywall Tan white 1 Asbestos Content(layers): <0.2596 Chrysotile;Non- Asb�stos Contert�(tayers): 0.259�6 Chrysotile;Non- detec�Nan-detect detect Recommendations: GENCRAL-See Secban VII Recommendations: GCNER�-See Secdton VII ��` � . � • • i Sample#: DW03-03 Sampte#: DW04-Ol � Sampte Description: Drywall Sample Description: Drywall Sample Location: Main Level Master Bathroom Sample Location: Main Level Master Bathroom Qoset Wall W�i Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Classifrcation: Surfacing Material Material Quantity: +/-75f�2 Material Quantity: +/-75fit2 Material Condition: Good Material Condition: Good Pi�ysical Description(tayers): White compound; Physicai Desc►iption(tayers): Peach wall coverin� Pink wall coverin Tan white d 1 White com und;Tan white d 1 Asbestos Coretent(tayers): 0.2596 Chrysotile;Non Asbestos Content(la,yoers): Non-detec�Non-detect; detec�Non-detect Non-detect Recommendations: GENERA4-See Secdon VII Recommendations: � � -See Section VII . � Samp►e#: DW0402 Sample#: DW0403 SampleDescriptioa: Drywall SampleDescription: Drywall Sample Location: Main Level Master Bathraom Sample Location: Main Level Master Bathroom � Wall Wall Material Clossification: Surfadng Material Material Classification: SurFacing Material Materiai Quantity: +/-75f�2 Material Quantity: +/-75i�z Materiai Condition: Good Material Condition: Gaod Physical D�scription(tayers): Tan/white drywall; physical Description(tayers): Pink wall covering; White joint compound;White tape;White �i��und;Tan/white drywall com und w cream ain�Pink wall caveri Ashesms Content(layers): Non-detec�Nan-detec� AsbesGvs Content(layers): Nan-detect;Non-detect; Non-detech.Nan-detec�Non-detect Non-detect Recommendations: GENCRAL-See Section V[I Recommendateons: �•See Section VII � g 1 Sampie#: DW05-01 Sample#: DW05-02 � SampleDescription: Drywall SampleDescription: Drywall Sample Location: Main Level Bathroom Wall Sampie Location: Main Level Bat6room Wall Mater�al Classifrcation: SurFacing Material Materia[Classifi�riion: Surfacing Materiai Malaeriai Quantity: +/-50ttz Material Quantity: +/-50ft2 Material Condition: Good Material Condiiion: Good Physica�Descripdon(tayers):White joint physical Description(layers):White compound; compaund;White tape;Multi-colared wall M�d�olored wall coverin�Tan/white drywaIl cove ' VYhite com und w white aint Asbestos Content(layers): <0.2596 Chrysotile;Non- Asbestos Conteret(layers): <0.25 Chrysotile; Non- detec�Non-d <0.25 b�e;Non-detect detec�Non-detect Recommertdations: GENERAL-See Section VII Recommendation� GENERAL-See Section VII . - � • Sample#: DW05-03 Sample#: DW06-01 Sample Descripdon: Drywall Sample Uescrlption: Drywall � Sample Location: Main Level Bathroom Wall Sample Location: Upper Level Bedroam Wall Material Classification: SurFacing Material Material Classification: Surfacing Material MQter�al Quantity: +/-50ft2 Material QuaRtity: +/-300t�2 Material Condition: Good Material Condidon: Good Physical Description(layers):Multi-colored wa1T Physical Description(layers):Tan/cream wall cove ' White com und;Tan white coveri White com and;Tan white d 1 Asb�sG�s Conte�t(lcr,�ers): Non-detec�0.596 AsbesGvs Cvntent([ayers): Non-detec�0.2596 tile;Non-detect Ch tile;Non-detect Recommendations: GENEItAL-See Section V(t Recommendations: �-See Secdon VII � 9 1 � Sample#: DW06-02 Sumple#: DW06-03 � SampleDescription: Drywall SampleDescripiion: Drywall Sample Location: Upper Level Bedroom Wall Sample Location: Upper Level Bedroom Wall Mate►ial Classifrcation: SurFacing Material MaGerial Cla�fication: Surfacing Material Mat�etial Quantity: +/-300ftz Material Quantity: +/-300ft2 Material Condidon: Good Material Condition: Good Physical Description(layers):Multi-colored wall Physical D�iption(layers):Tan/cream wall cove ' White com und;Tan wtute cove ' White com und;Tan white d t Asbesbns Content(la,yoers): Non-detec�0.25% AsbesG�s Cont.ent(layers): Non-detect;0.596 Ch sotile;Non-detect Ch b�e; Non detect Recommendation� G N -See Seclion VIl Recommendations NERAL-See Section VII . � Sample�: DW07-Ol Sample�#: DW07-02 Sample Description: Drywall Sample D�rcription: Drywall Sample Location: Upper Level Bathroom Wall Sample Location: Upper Level Bathroom Wall � Material Class�cation: Surfacing Material MateriQl Classifrcation: SurFacing Material Mat�erial Quantity: +/-200ft2 Material Quantity: +/-200ft2 Materiai Condition: Good Material Condition: Good Physical Description[layers):W6ite paint w/white Physical Descripdon(tayers):White compound compound;White tape;White joint compound; w/white paint;Whiteipink tape;White joint Tan white com und;Tan w6ite Asbestos Content(ta,yoers): <0.2596 Chrysodle;Non- AsbesG�s Content(layers): <0.2596 Chrysot�e;Non- detect;<0.25%Ch sotile;Non-detect detect;<0.259�6 odle;Non-detect Recommendatiores: ��-See Section VII Recommendatior►� GENERAL-See Section Vli � 10 1 • � � i Sample#: DW07-03 Sample#: DW08-Ol � Sample Description: Drywall Sample D�ption: Drywall Sample Location: Upper Level Bathroam Wall Sampie Location: Main Level Master Bedroom Wall Materiat elassifcaaon: Surfacing Material Material Classiftcation: Surfacing Material Material Quantity: +/-200tt2 MaGerial Quanfity: +/-350f�z Material Condit�on: Good Material Condition: Good Pkysical Description(layers):White oompound physical Descripdon(layers):Multi-colored wall w/wlute paint;White tape;White joint compound; coverin�Tan/whit+e drywall Tan white Asbestos Content(layers): <0.2596 Chrysodle;Non- ��s Conter�t�layers): Non-detec�Non-detect detect;<0.2596 sotile;Non-detect Recommendations: E E -See Section VII Recommendations: GENERAL-See Secdon VII � It Sample#: DW08-02 Sample#: DW08-03 Sampie Description: Drywall Sumple Description: Drywall � Sample Loccrtion: Main Level Master Bedroom Sample Location: Main Level Master Bedroom Wall Wall Material Classifiaation: Surfacing Material Material Ctassificntion: Surfacing Material Material Quantity: +/-350ftz Material Quantity: +/-350ft2 Material Condidon: Good Material Condidon: Good Physical Description(Iayers):Multi-calored wall Physrcal Description(layers):Multi-colored wall cove ' Tan white d cove ' Tan white l;White com und Asbestos Content(layers): Non-detect;Non-detect ��OS Content(layers): Non-detect;Non-detect; <0.25% tile Recommendations: GENERAL-See Section Vll Recom�nendations: ��;NERAj�-See Section VII � 11 1 � ' � Sample#: FTOl-01 Sample#: VF01-01 � Sample Description: Resilient Floor Tile Sample Description: Vinyl h"looring Sample Location: Lower Level Family Room, Sample Location: Lower Level Bathroom Hallwa ,Bedrooms Ma�erial Classification: Miscellaneous Material Material Classi�cation: Miscellaneous Material Material QuQntity: +/-1,200ft2 Material Quantity: +/-60ft2 Material Condition: Good Materrat Condidon: Good Physical Description(layers):Black mast[r,Tan Physical Description(layers):W6ite/tan sheet 800r dle • vin w white flbrous ba �E tan adhesfve Asbest�os Content(layers): 10°1�Chrysotile;8% ��s Content(layers): 20�i6 Chrysot3le tile Recomrr�endatlons: IMMEDIATE-See Section VII. Recommendations: 1MMEDIATE-See Section VII Sampie#: VF02-01 Sample#: VF03-01 Sample Description: Vinyl F'looring Sample Description: Vinyl Floaring � SQmple Locat�on: Main Level Master Bathroom Sample Location: Main Level Master Bathroom Material Classiftcation: Miscellaneous Material Ma�eriat ClQ�sfficadon: Miscellaneaus Material Material Quantfty: +/-75t�2 Material Quantity: +/-100ft2 Material Condition: Good Material Condition: Good Physicat D�sc�ipiion(tayers):W6ibe/tan sheet Physical Description(layers):White/tan sheet vin w white fibrons &tan adhesive vIn w white flbrous ba �tan adhesive Asbestos Content(1ay�ers): 209�6 C6rysotile Asbestos Content(layers): 20%Chrysotile Recommendadons: IMMEDIATE-See Sectian VII Recommendationr. IMMEDIATE-See Secdon VIl � ,. 12 Sampie#: VF04-01 Sample#: Cf01-01 � Sample Description: Vinyl F7ooring Sample Description: Ceiling Tile Sample Location: Main Level Closet F1oor Sample Location: Lower Level Ceiling Mudeerial Classiftcation: Miscellaneous Material MaGerial Classification: Miscellaneaus Material Material Quantity: +/-15ft2 Materia/Quantfty: +/-1,ZOOftz Material Condidon: Good Material Condidon: Good Physical Description�layers):Cream/tan sheet vinyi w/multi-colared fibrnus baclung&yellow Physical Description(Iri,Ners):White/tan ceiling tile adhesive Asbestos Content(�ayers): Non-detect Asbestos Conte►tt(layers): Non-detect Recommendadons: ENC -See Section VII Recommendadons: GENERAL-See Section VII r Sample#: PL01-01 Sample Descripffon: Plaster Sample Location: Main Level Master Bedroom � Fire lace Material Classification: Miscellaneous Material Material Quantity: +/-50f�z Materiat Condidon: Good Physical DescripLiore(layers):White perlitic plaster w white aint Asbest�os Co�etent(tayers): Non-detect Recommendations: GENE -See Secdon VII �. 13 VII. Recommendations IMMEDIATE: The laboratory results of the potential ACM sampled at 375 Farest Rd, Vail, Colorado, on May 2, 2010, � indicate that one(1)bulk sample of resilient flaor tile as well as mastic from the lawer level was positive for asbestos between 896 and 109�o Chrysotile. Three (3) bulk-samples of vinyl flooring from the lower level bathrooms, the main level master bathroom, and the upper level bathroom tested positive for asbestos at 20%Chrysotlle. Because the above-referenced, friable, vinyl Rooring must be removed from the residence prior to demolition and the total quantity exceeds the regulatory trigger level of 32ftz, a Coloradalicensed asbestos ababement contractor is required to perform the removal, inciuding formal nadfication to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment prior to the abatement of the ACM. The non-friable resilient flflor tile within the lower level of the residence may remain during demolition, however,must remain non-friable during removal. lf a demolition process cannot be used such that this material remains non-friable, it must be removed by a Colorado-licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to demolition. � � 14 APPENDIX A SAMPLE LOCATIONS � � 15 APPENDIX B CERTIFICATION � , ., , ., �� i ��'' P� i, b.`'2�r ��t �f,f�r^! '�� •� �r�''""�. 4 �„t.....' 'f`'.`�`. . '�� ,.:�-.�,,�yr�e�x�. ��,�"r-y t�*y'��.�wr s ,3� +�,%� � ,y'3�• ��t �#.�.','�?� f ,�i�' � t`� �"c;.f�tizt� "�`` � � ;t s. r a•?, Y4�. i�� •--,. 3�� '� �.' L � . _ ._ _ ' ' �� F �-Yf�, �� STATE OF COLORADO �`��.�. .� � � ��°, �r� � ASBESTOS �;�'��, � "'� � CERTIFICATION* `�� `` n� k , �x - �� i,' �is`,� Colorado Dcpartment of Public Health �! � _ � and Environmmt � Air PolEution Conuol Division � =�' ��'� r .� pn�.,:: - �. ... �;Z�� 6�- ' ��. z�j'' �_ �1►5 CCi�IfIGS L}18t �� - -� � ��. �- Steve Shurtliff ?�.- ` ��, ,�. � K-1 �� -: ,� Certificatioa No:15413 r • ° ;� � ''-r� `� �r ' �`. _ ��>,. has met the requiremenu of 25-7-50T,C.R.S.and Air Qualiry Conwl � � Commission Regulation No.8,Part B.and is hereby certified by the r�Y.�'4. : ��i;;�4 state of Colorado ia the following discipline: .��:;;�`, s' , .> �. � r �__ Building Inspector* � � � I -� � . � � : � �� '� �ea: 6n�aoo9 " } e. �� .� .� '� �`� ��: Bxpiresoe: 6nvzolo /' F , fi:. � / ! �� ' 1�� L t �. a+�. ., � � ( ��GG.�'- � ti�- f . �unaa.oarcoR.a..nuer. i a' `� �� x�; �...�l_ � � . '�: •7iS eeiyi�6ctr M/�lY rtri M�n�fI rvrsr�vJrt4�d�f^� ->; i;:'4• ;. :.. : mRylnNwiiatle�6a;ii�srys�+l4it'Y'n _ri y ,�'��. tw�� s }�r,� :... . . �Ew . �:�'�- '��. �,. .��++t �^t a� �� ' ..a.�s� � 5.�.� �� : � z�;�i � s;�;�, :��i� ' �',,. : �'`�,`�.''�'' �` '`'�� ' �yl �Y y��. i� ��y { 'r� � � � , '� �: :��•r i1w lt�J ..^y♦ ♦ 5�•• •��. t•�k. � -_.?. i _. . APPENDIX C LABORATORY ANALYSIS � 16 RE� �►B Reservoirs Environm�nta/, /nc. � March 16,2010 ��Y�� S Subcontract Number. NA Laborat�ry IZeper� RE3187704-1,2 ProJect p!P.O.# 2006 Pr�ect Desc�iption: 375 Forest I�d.,Vail,CO Steve Shu�liff OS Consumng, Inc. 3247 S. indiana St. Lakewood CO 80228 Dear Customer, Resenroirs Environmerrtal, Inc. is an analytical laboratory accredited for the analysis of Industrial Hygiene and Environmental matrices by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Prog�am (NVLAP), Lab Code 101896-0 for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis and the American Industrial Hygiene Association(AIHA), Lab ID 101533-Accreditation Certificate #480 for Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) analysis. This taboratory is currentiy proficient in both Proficiency Testing and PAT programs�espectively. Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. has analyzed the following samples for asbestos content as per your request The analysis has been completed in general accordance with the appropriate methodofogy as stated in the attached analysis table.The resufts have been submitted to your office. � RES 187704-1.2 is the job number assigned to this.study. This report is considered highy confide�rtial and the sole property of the c�stomer.Reservoirs Ernironmerrtal, Inc.will not discuss any part of this shady with personnel other than those of the dient. The resulis descxibed in this report oniy apply to the samples analyzed.This report must not be used to daim endorsement of products or analytical resutts by NVLAP or any �ency of the U.S. Govemment. This report shaN not be reproduced except in iull, Nritt�out written approval from Reservoirs Environmerrtai, Inc. Samples will be disposed of after sixty days unless longer storage is requested. If you have any que�ion.s about this report,piease feel trce to caa 303-964-1986. Sincerely, __---� ,�' y - . - �� -- _--�- _ _ Jeanne Spencer Orr , President - �,�.� .s�!�� Analyst(s): Paul D.LoScalzo Wenlong Liu Michael Scales Rich Wegrryn Mita Bridges James Venendaal Adam Kinch Louis A. Church Jr. Robert R.Workman Jr. P:303-964-1986 ggp� ��,�ite 100 Denver,CO 80216 1-886-RESI-ENV � F:303-477-4275 _. www.reitab.com �e�as v v v v v = m c�� ? n �? m D � y� tl N N � C O 3� � m � � � .��. � ,.��_• L � `�� yx b b b b b �a � o �, � � � o m � N -� w �" -' � °' � -� 3 g.,o. °. Q�� o.�c � �. � � r�- ��'��;, � o � c � W �g � m � Q r m <t,� ` � �s a. � � Z � O r � � , � tA � m m m m m —p � ;a � 3 � v � .o � � � 3 � 3 2 m.c� 3m p � N � m @. w c�.� w w w � � m�p � p o m A � ui c�ii c�i� cn c�ii 10 N� � w � c � 2 � � o � ". o -� °o c�°c � v � o � oa � � Q � � - - r� m � (� WD � Q � D WD � (� aDD � nODD � m � Dr � � m n O a - � � � � � � � � � � � � � s � d � � � o o � m � � � � � � � � � � � � � �. fA � o m �o � o m m � o � m o m m m o � � � o .=: o � °— :. m � o � � ? o S'i o o p � Q�°m 3 � a3 � � a � a3 ��i a �0 3 �' o � � � 8 8 � ao = O � a3 � a ,3� � � � ao � o n Q � O � 5 �y ^ � �� `� � � s � � � � �� C � : m � a � a � � a n g sro 3 � � < �m � � � � — � m ui si � co � � m a � 70 � � 3 '� � m � g Z ?. �. � ' ' ' � 3 ' � m J � � a r Z CD � t7� p� OD � U� Ch 00 N � N � t7� CD CJ� Vt CIl �� A 00 00 00 OC71 O C7� �� Q 3 � z � O � � a j �_ � � � 3 O ? s � ZzZZ Z2ZZ ZZ ZZZZ zw, -iZZ � pppp G � OG OD DO � O Gp � OC _ 3 �� Q� � � j o .�.► � OU�100 0000 00 000 (�7� O Z1 V�iO �5� � � � � � O O N � � -�+. � � � � � �O 00 t00 � O � O t000 <G O O �� C j OC7100 0000 00 OOOCJ� O OCJ� O z � �p � � � c � c � � nnnm D ��9`�G W W N lOit I�i1 3� � � � � !n .�-. .3. .,�-,. ` � � �$ N b a � w �m � ° a+ m � � o m � -� 3 .°Q.�. Z �� ^-� � a$ � :3 � � r ��a<� vz 3 U �•�•a � W � C � �g�� ' � � C m� � � ��• a 3 � Z � O r � � y tA � � � � 3 � Z m a3m � � � � m � = A O- A � C') 70 w °t.� w w w 3 �� S �=,, ° _ °D m a� $ �, c � � � o 0 o S o � � .. � � � � D o m oa � � Q � � _ N rn � D (� � D OC� WD � D �7 C� WD � m �[ Dr � � r n O i�+ 5 � n � � �! m � m c � °i s � � °i ? °� s � 3 ao O O i'11 z � � ._. .� � � � .... � � .:.. � � tA � � c� � � o �' oo. o � o � ouo o -� m o ° $ � o �� •=• o o m° o O � � 3 � o � � � � � m � � � m � Z � < a -g a a -g a$ g a-$ a � g � = Q u� a � � o, � a 3 � o. u� a 3 p < � � �N � _ � = g � _ � � _ _ � � �� fll � � � � a � a �A C� s �, C ..� o �. � � � c n� m g � � � � � a o � '� o�i � � oZ �. � � � '� g S '"' � g m z � a r z ao -� c,� w � -� i � w w a� -� cn w � o�i c A V1 Ut � W W O O O O V N O �� O z � S O S 3 �� 3 .� p � � � � n � 0 0 � � � , em e � � � � « 3 c O O p � ` 3 Zi� -1 ZZi� -1 ZZZ2 ZZ Zi� -12Z � QO� 70 � Cla � OG � � GC Da � O � 0 3 �� -+ �° ° °�° � ' o � oo � ooctOi� o 00 0 � c�iio ��m �i � m � � . m � o c.� 3 0 A � -" D � Q °° m o � .�. o co 0 o cc o co 0 0 �� °c � 0 0 00 0 oocno 00 0 ocno a� 0 G v =� � c » nnnm D �--. -�� o o � w 3� 3 � � � � � > > tn orD $ � {. r. ,-. � ��'x � � b b gm � o � � v � o m E 'G � � w N 0.�.�A m C 'a � �.�<� � � � v z 3 3 �rn, a .Z'1 �ga� � � � � C � � � �� g � , C � » Z � o � � N � � 3 � � � z m a � m p � w � m @. c � v_ � -n °' n ,r � � � w w � 3 a� zw ° � � m � a� � �i � $ ,�, o �, !� � � � c°o a°o o •.• o � oa n � p � � t�, m � (� a� D m v (� aD D (� ao D (� ao D � m -< D r m � � � O � � � � � � � � -� -a � -v -� v � �' n v � � � � Ss � � � � ? cn m 3 � a° � 0 AI ° � N� � � N N� m � � O n � � O � � p ? ._: O � � � Ol O � � 0 � � � p O � /� a � o o � m � a a� = n. $ � Z a � A oo O � � � � � 3 � � � < � � � � ¢� � �A -� � � °'m' a'o � �S = °' °' � =e'Q °' �3 O fll — — � � 3 v � � eQ 'c ea � Z � � a � � a �°� m � � � � � o Z � � � 3 � m z � a r z (J� N N Ja � ..• -� -� A 4J W OD -� .� �;�G A OU1C71 OCJ1U1 V1 (71 000 00 O v � Q. O 3 � w� � � � a 0 � s ... m O � 3 O � S 3 ZZ2 ZZZZZ 2ZZ ZZi� -1 � C � � 0 � � � � � G � � � 0� .'� ! 0 � �� Q�° o ,-. � -► rn rn m cn � � 000 oocnoo 000 00 � �� am � °� � m � � o .A. D 3 � � � D � 'v � .� � � � �.u a tDOA AO O CA �COA tOtn O �3 C j 000 OOC1100 000 00 O ... o � oo 0 0 00 00 0 00 0 � 3 �2 o ch o rn o cr rn cr o rn c� o rn 0 o m ... � .- � �- � � �- a Q o E _ �o � � O •. m � a c m � � � o � o � o0 0 � o o � o � a a � o c dQ � � � � � � a� � ao � r- ao �. .- � a c �� ' 0 oC �oOGOCwG � �oOG G � nG G � �OC � F- hZ ZHH Z t- H Z Z Z 1- p Z 2i- H Z � � V V V � C rii O � . m Z m � � 3 � 3 m � � ci oti � c° � c° � c° a .. �s .. w « .. .. � �� VQ Va V � Va Va n�^ o � � � � o u� �n o0 0 00 � �a� e- �- �- � Q e- � 1� e- N t� e- e- � v Z � H � Z � � � � _ . o ° � `° � . � mo � � � $ w �—° � � � � o� 9 a 3 � � �. a� t o a� � ;�W � � J t a � � ; — `—� — `—' — � — � Z $ > a� � �a � � � � � vg � � �' L� o m $ m � � $. 8. 8. � ~ 0 0 0 �° � « � ° � ° �o r � o m � Q U m U W f- N � a Yw � .�' � � $ � � ° w � s^ WO O � r t � s � r � � � t � � t � A pC � c� � � 3 � 3 f- 3 � t- � 3 f- ►- 3 F- � � c � � � � a } w � a m � o w a m � am � am � " w - � � Q � � � o • o •� ss � � � � o .- c� cn � a.. N � � � � atp- r- �tp � � � V � O �Ot � eet � u� � � u�i . d' yt� 1DIL � � � � Z � W W t/l g � ei J a ta � � � � � a � ocir�''�, � a �3 � °_ w w w w w ai � � � z � Q a o �.a � � Y � �. > �� 7 � � c� 6� � � Z � � . ,ca�.sX' a � m oa. �v � �� o o � � � � ` �q aQ �c} � � �� J � c c c � �. a�`oQ =�.� O O O � z��z� � Q woo °—' � `° � � °1 � � 3 3 3 3 F- � UUUDdri- � Z G G C G ^ O O O O O O O �Cf O O O 1p O O � 7 C� N O O! CV O Cf O O � O O � � O m ... � r- �- � � � a` C Q � LL Oa d o E co � ro o R m c � a � o � o o � o � � � o � � � o � a o .� O c°e °° F' � °° � � f- °' �' � �' °' F' � �� Cp �� a � O � G � �oG CoC �oG � �oGOCaG � �o0 � �cfG N ZF- NZ ZF� p2 F- N21- NZ H � ZHH Z C s E � V V V V C w O � p m j m � m j al j dl � O j M � M � Mv Nw Nw iv p +�.. ;, �`� �.� �.� �.z .. .� �� c so z = o � o .c to � � a � � � a � a � S � n. �n �n o o � �n o o �. � o 00 0 � �a oe � i- 1� �- CV co � � tV tn � � � 1� Z J Z � � � � -� � z o s 3 a � � � � _ � o � � � r � � S W � � � �o � = T� ' — ' — � c — 3 c — 3 -� a � � $ � ' 3 � � Z = � � 3 � � � � � 3 � � o �o � � p o m m � � � � � � $ -o � �$ � � o�C O ° $ � � °g � � � � o � � ao � W � � m � � e� � o 0 0 � o a� o � WO � L � � t � — zt � � tt c � OC o. c°� _ � 3 � � 3 � �S 33 � � � 3 � � � - � � � c � � � � arw � am c� am c� a mc� o ¢ mc� o � W � � � 'C O � O � � ` � d' ID �O ^ �p � N �. � �- � 1n M � p F- O 3 a � N $ � �p W � � m �t � � �n � V � O � tN �z � � u�i � uMi a W y � � l0 � �ef A Z � � � � � � p � � p, �j � 0 W W W W ,� y � � � a o a a o � $� � � �-m ��,a. . � E ° m � °o �.��x, J � Z � � �� 3� a � m m3. �v �, Z O O � F' 3 �p ` N l'q � N x�� W O a` a10 .�► � C m� � g q 4 p� � fi .J � :-: •+ r N �.N Q C Q' O O Z�Fx!a � m � mOm +°+ N � w • EE Q w _ _ _ � � � 3 3 3 3 3 � � � � � od ,- o z c o c c Ol O 1A O O O O O O O O O O N � L 3 C `� O O � tV W N � N1A0 01 � 1� � O � .� e- � � � � C ,� � � v � o � � m � � o o � ��; � �rn � ° a°o ° °w �°n a°o �°n � � o `� a � om � � �. �� E 0 . GCwO � �OG GC GG CGOCb o � � M � t- H21- NZ ZZ ZZ 2ZF- N �' � s v V w Q W N m � m j m � � m m � � c° o � � ot° oc° � � �� `� 2` �` �' � � � � a � a � � v 0 � �a� o 00 o ao � c°h ° cQic° � c� rn ° Z J � � a W � � c � 0 ° S a �.� � � � _ � � w � 3 0 � as � `��. � o m m 3 � �W g g � ao 3 � _ � _ � _ `_' — 3t � Z = � Q $ �, � �, 3 �, � �, � � � L � p o -v � v � v m -v � �n � ~ Z� c o �o � o � `o � o � c � o �cot� � � W F- � o .- � $ � $ � Y � ar Y �° OY tf� M � tt � � � � � � t � c = o a � p . p ao �a co m m co � a c� r 3 3 E- � E- � �-- � E- 3 m F- 3 � � � . ` o V c � � � -iQ >- w � Q mU 0 <Cm 4m QmU Qm ¢ � W N � � � Q �- g 'a0 � O N �"' 3 � � � � � tp (p N N M � N � N W � � g �N ,,a � '��' r�i � � � � �. � '' v � c=i o n � '� �n � �r, � W Wtll � ��., 4 � u! 1i Z � � � � �d � � a � o � �., � a �, � � w w w w w w ,� a� � � >- �z � Q a c 9.a � O � �� - � � ��p � �` aX m m � O � ns��T.vt � � Z 0 � � �X�� J � a. � 0 03, �'0 �N, °�i�� Z oo � F- � � ` e� � a � � � ��g � o an`. � i° oc m R 4 q q � $� � Q . � � >, v = a� g � � ��z� � � c c c o � m u� mmm � � E :: oE � o 0 � � � � � oQ � o z' o c o c � > _ � c3Q � ti ti ° o o � �� - �° � $. v � o � � W � c w a � in o 0 0 ° ca o5 � �� ch rn a �� LL � � 0 o p p p 5 � �1 a Z Z Z c O W .� � m ~ � 2' � � c t s � � v � �^ g °o °o o °o V �a � r- �- .- �- r- Z — J Fa- � w m � Z � o 'o o .. W � � om � � a� c � � a'�o i°a Z o Z m m � m m O � t t ' v � • = c E 16 -L� > � 3 � °�- 3 > 3 3c 3 a� � Z � � J t� C � c � i. � a`� L � .-. � a 8 j a 0 r � .'. '� � m o 0 � o •m t � t a � c�s � m m o � ~ � o �c °ts c � � � m � � � � �° � w � °. W H o — � m a� o W O Q ao � � t c� m � t .c p � a C� t � � � � U � � �i � � - v o V c j �p g � Q ?� W � Q Q Q Q Q W N ' d. � � � � 'OO � O la- O � � �i � N � (�V N (�V C�V N � U � p OtN WZ E � � � u�'� � � p� al V u. ` �p ` � � W W fA � IQ J �f'16 Z � � � � � � a oco � � d � � � w w w w w � N � � Z � � Q agv �s� Y y � > � �� J � v m m � � m � � a X g � Z � � � �� J j � � O �_. � �� a Z N m p.�C >, $ J O dd � A NQ C �'� N t�! � q q ��,Z�Sa � � O m N �.m+ W � w m LLI = = = N C � l0 � W � l�L LOL t�L F�- J � � c� t� c� o ¢� o m z > > > c� a rage i ot i Mike Foster � From: Steve ShurtiifF[steve�dsconsuldnginc.com] Sent: Tuesday,March 16,2010 9:26 PM To: MikeF�Dtriumphdev.com Subject: Asbestas Report Attachments:2006-Mike Faster-375 Fo�est Rd,Vaii,CO 3-2-10[ACMij.pdf Mike, Please find attached the report for 375 Forest Rd in Vail. All of the samples that were reported initiaily as containing a trace amount of asbestos were�e-analyzed and reported at less than 1%. This is great news,so only the vinyl flooring from the bathrooms in all three levels need to be abated. The floo�tile can remain. I wiii let you look over the report, please call me with any questions you have. i will touch base with you tomorrow and make su�e you received this report a�d have everything you need. i can help you get a good abatement company to do the�emoval. I will need to do finai clearances from the abatement and then sign your demolition pennit. Take care,talk to you soo�, Thanks again, Steve Shurtlit�' Project Manager DS Consulting,Inc. � (303)378-1544 www.dsconsuitinginc.com steve@dsconsultinginc.com � � ,. 4/19/2010 H� � � � � _ �� tE�h , . _ , � � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL � - ,� � �, I I � � . � � p � � � o � c� APR 2 3 2010 SUBSURFACE STUDY TOWN OF VAIL FOR F4UNDATI�N DESIGN PROPOSED DUPLEX '�G -Q G'� g LOT 3,BLOCK 2,VAIL VILLAGE 3�FILING 375 FOREST ROAD VAIL, COLORADO Town of Vait �� JOB N � �� O. 109 428A JANUARY 20,2010 � PREPARED FOR: TRIUMPH DEVELOPMENT, LLC ATTN: MICI3AEL O'CONNOR 8120 WOODMONT AVENUE,SUITE 800 BETHESDA, MARYLAND 20814 � � TABLE QF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY............................................................................ 1 , PROP�SED CONSTRUCI'TON.....................................................................................- l - SI'I'E CONDI'I'IONS................... . ................................................................................-2- FIELDE�PLORA'TiON.................................................................................................-2- SLTBSURFACE CONDI'I'IONS......................................................................................-3 - FOUNDAT'ION BEARING CONDI'I'IONS...................................................................-4- DESIGN RLCOMMENDATIONS... ................................................. ...........................-4- FOUNDA'I`IONS.........................................................................................................-4- FOUNDATTON AND RE'I'AINING WALLS............................................................-6- FLOORSLABS..................... . . ................................................................................- 7- UNDBRDRAINSYSTEM................... ......................................................................-8 - 3ITEGRADING.. ......................................................................................................-9- SURRACE DRAINAGE................................................. ..........................................- 10- LIMITA'I'IONS.............................................................................................................- 10- � FIGURE 1 -LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 2-LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORiNG FIGURE 3 -LEGEND ANA NOTES FIGURE 4-SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 5-GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1-Si:fMMARY OF LABOR.ATORY TEST RESULTS � � � � PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF S'I'UDY This report presents the results of a subsurface study for a proposed duplex to be located on Lot 3,Block 2, '�ail Village 3'�Filing,375 Forest Road,Vail,Colorado. The project 51�1S S�IOWiI OII FIgt1CC 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal far Seotechnica�engia�eering services to Triumph Development, LLC,dated December 22, 2009. A field eacploration progra,m consisting of an exploratory boring was conducted to obtain infonnation on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the snbsoils and bedrock obtained during the field explora.fiion were tested inE the laboratory to det�rmine their classification, compressibility or swell arnd other engineering characterisiics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to deveiop recommendations for foundation types,depths and allowable pressures for thc proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, des�ign recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the � proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION An existing residence on the lot will be removed for the mew construction. The proposed dnplex,which will consist of a primary and secondary unit,will be two story wood fianne struchires over walkout baszment leve�s tocated as shown on Figure 1. The attached garages along the south side of the building will be stacked. Giround floors will be slab- on-grade. Approximate elevations of the primary(western)unit floor levels will be 8234' for the g�arage, 8232' for e�try/upper level, 8220' for the mid-level and 8208'for the lower level. Approximate elevations of the secondary(eastern)unit floor levels will be 8234'for the upper le�+el, 8224' for the garage/enhy and$210' for the lower level. Grading for the structure will zequire cut depths between about 4 to 15 feet. Theare wiil be fill up to about 14 feet deep in the driveway area for a total grade ch�ge of about 30 fee� The exphill side t�etaining walls for the buildi.ng wilI be two levels,about 20 feet tail. We � Job No.109 428A � -2- asswne relative2y light to malerate foundation loadings,typical of the pmposed type of � construction. If building load�ings,location or gradiug plans change significandy from those described. above,we should be norified to re-eva�uate the recommendarions contained in this report. SITE COND�TIONS The existing reside.�ce,located on the lot as shown on Figure 1,has a lower floor elevation of about 8223 feet The site is moderately steep hillside temain below Forest Road with gra�cles ranging from about 25 to 30%. The�ne has been grading on the site far the existing develapment including fiIl behind a 10 to 12 feet high retaining wall to prorride acoess and parking from Forest Road. The slope below Forest Road is steep due to fill placement for the road constniction. Elevation d�ifference across the proposed duplex is about �6 feet�d acrass the lot is about 38 feet. The site was covered with about 2 to 2h feet of snow at the time of our field exploration. Vegetaticm consists of aspen azid conifer trees with an undeistory of likely grass,weads � and brush. There is a drainage along the east properiy line that we expect flows water at leasi during spring ninoff. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on January 6,2010. C�ne exploratory boring was drilled at the location shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the general subsurface oonditions, The boring was drilled as near the retaining wali iza the upper part of the lot as practical. Access onto the lot��borings in the proposed building azea was not possible due to the steep terrain and snow cover. The boring was advanced with 4 inch diaznetear continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CMB-45B drill rig. The boz�ing was logged by a repres�ntative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnica�,Inc. � Samples of the subsoils and bedrock were taken with 13/s inch and 2 inch I.D.spoon samplezs. The saznplers were driven into the subsoiIs and bedrack at v�rious depths with � Job No.I09 428A r� - 3 - blows from a 140 pound harnm�r falling 30 inches. This test is simi�ar to the standard � penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetrafiion resistaace values are an indication of the relative de�sity or consistency of the subsoils and hardness of the bedrock. Depths at which the samples were taken and the pene,tration resistanoe values are shown on the Log of Exploratary Boring Figure 2. The samples were retumed to our latioratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITTONS ' A graphic log of the subsurface condi�aons encountered at the site is shown on Figure 2: The sub�ils enoountered,below abaut 9 feet of wall backfill,cansisted of about 4 feet of loose clayey silty sand with scattered gravel underlain by weathered and madium�hard claystone shale. Below about 15'r4 f�t depth aud extending to the depth dn'lled of 191h feet,was hard to very hard limestone bedrock. Drilling in the limestone with auger equipment was difficult due to its hardness and dri�ling zefusal was encauntered in the deposit. The fill consisted of clayey silty sand with gravel and cobbles. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained&om the boring included natural � � moistuz�e conteat and density,gradation analyses and Atterberg limits. Results of swell- consolidation testing per,fornaed on a relatively undisturbed drive sample of the weathered claystone,gres�ntsci on Figure 4,indicate 1ow compressi'bility�nder Ioading and low expat�sion potent�aI when wetted. Results of gradation analyses perfornned on a sma11 diameter drive sanaple(minus 1'r4 inch fraction)of the fill are shown on Figure S. The liquid and plastic limits testing on a sample of the fine por4ion of the naiural satid soils � indicates low plasticity. The labozatory testing is sumnaarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the boxing at the time of drilling. When checked 1 and 5 days following drilting,free water level in the bozang was at a depth of about 17%2 feet. The subsoils were moist to very moist with depth and the weathered shale and Iimestone bedrock were very moist to moist with depth. � Job No.109 428A C� -4- FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS � We expect generally similar substu�face conditions at the proposed building site to those encountered in our boring in the upper part of the lot. At assumed cut depths,we expect the subgrade condidons will vary from suil and weathered claystone shale in the shallower cuts to hard to very hard limestone in the deeper cut areas. The soils are probably moderately compressfble and t�e wea.thered claystone and limestone bedrock ma.terials slight�y compressible�mder foundation loadings. Spread footings should be feasible for foundation suppozt of the bui�ding with some risk of differential moveznent. The risk is due primarily to the likely variable bearing conditions,the compzessble nature of the soils,and the low expansion potential of the weathered claystone shale. Parbial or complete removal of the soil and/or weathered claystone could be done to reduce the foundation movement risk. Dne to the relatively low expansion potendai and limited depth of the weathered claysto,ne,designing the footings fior a minim�dead load presstu�e does not appear needed. � Additional borings co�td be drilled or backhoe pits exca,vated in the px+oposed building aree after removal o�the existing residence and when access is possible to better evaluate the subsurface ccmditions and need for removal of v�niable bearing materials below buildiz�g areas prior to construction. . DESTGN RECOMM�NDATIO1vS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in�he exploratory boring and the nah�re of the proposed oonstruetion,we recommezxd the building be founded with spread footings bearing on#he natural granulaz soils and/or bedrock materials. The upp�tall retaiuing walls in the deepes cut areas may be on the bedrock amd can probably be � assumed as such for the preliminary design. We should further evaluate the bearing oondition prior to constr�ction of the bnilding found.ation. � Job No. 109 428A �Hp_ _,_ C�BC31iP.GTt -5- � The design and constn�ctic�n criteaia presented below should be obse,tved for a spread footing foundation system. l) Faotings placed on the undishubed nahu�al gran�lar soils or bedrock should be designed for an allawable bearing pressure af 2,000 psf. Based on experience,we exped settlement of footings designed and const�uct@d as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch and differential. 2) Footings placed entirely on the hard limestone bedrock can be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. Settlement of�ootings bearing on the hard bedrock are expected to be 1 inch or less. 3) The footings should have a minimum width of 18 iriches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 4} Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their beaxing eievation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 48 inches below extenior grade is - typically used in this area. 5} Continuous foundation walls shoutd be well rein�forced top and bottom to � span local ar�omalies and better witUatand the effects of some differential movement such as by assusning an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the°FoundaEion and Retaining Walls"section of this report. � All eacisting fill,topsoil and any loose or disttabed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the natiu�al granular soils or bedzoc,c materials. The exposed soil subgrade in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. If water seepage is encountered,the footing - areas should be dewatered before concrete placement. � A representative of the geot�echnical engin�r should observe alI footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. � Job No.109 428A � -6- �OUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS � Foundation walls and retaining structwes up ta about 15 feet high which are latez-ally supported amd can be expected to und�rgo oniy a slight amount of deflection should be designed far a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weighi of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils and well broke,n bedrock materials. Foundation walls and retaining structures taller than about 15 feet high which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection sliould be designed for a uniform lateral earth pressure load of 2SH psf where H is the wali height in feet Cantilevered retaining structures up to about 15 feet in height which are separate from the buildin�g and can be expected to deflect snfficienfly to mobilize the fiill active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth presssure oomputed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils and well broken bedzock. Cantileve�ed retaining structures greater than about 15 feet i�height whic�are separate from the building and cau be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the:fu11 active earth pmssure condition should be de'signed for a unifnrm lateral earth prGSSUre of 22�i in � psf where H is the wai�height in fe�. The wall backfill should not contain vegetation, topsoil or rocks greater than about 12 inches in size. All foundation and retainin.g structiues should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic aad surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings,traffc,construction materials and equipment The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup�ofwater behind$wall or ar�upward sIoping backfii�surface will increase the laterat pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hyc�rostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and cflmpacted to at least 90%of the maximum stanc�ard Proctor de.nsity at a moisture cor►tent near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway azeas should be compacted to at least 95%of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact tiie backfill or use large equipment � Job No.]09 428A ►� -�- . near the wall,since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on th�wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfiIl shouid be expected,even if the material is placed correct�y, and could re.qult in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. Use of a select granular ixnport materiai,sucb as road base,and increasing compaction to 100%standard Froctor density could be done to help mitigate the settlement potential. The laterai resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing an the foundation materials and passive earth pressure againsE the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at t�Ze bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coe.ffia�t of friction of 0.40. A coefficient of fridion of 0.50 can � be use�for footings bearing on the hard to very hard limestone bedrock. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivatent fluid unit weight of 375 pcf for moist condition and 200 pcf for submerged condition. The ooe�cient of fric�ion and passive pressure values�recommendad above � assume ultinaate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to Iimit the strain which will ocxur at the ultimate sbrength,particularly in the case of passive res�stance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to r�sist lateral loads � should be a suitable granular material oompacted to at least 95%of the maximum starxdard Proctor density at a moisture content neaz optimum. � FLOOR SLABS The naturai on-site soils and non-expansive bed�roc�k materials,exclusive of topsoil, are suitab2e to support lightly laaded slab-on grade construction. Some differeatial movement of the floor slabs could occ�u due to the likely variable subgrade conditions. Subexcavation of 2 to 3 feet of the soii and/or weathered claystone may be needed to limit the potential for slab moveznent and should be fiuther eva�uat�at the time of construction To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs shovld be separated from a�l bearing walls and c�lumns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical - movemeat. Floor slab control joints shou]d be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage . cracking. The requirements for joint spacing aad slab reinforcement shottld be � Job No. 109 428A � � - 8 - established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 � inch layer of freo-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drain$ge. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50%retained on the No.4 sieve and Iess than 2%passing the No.200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95%of maximurn star�dard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Rec�uired fill can consist of the on-site granular soils and well broken bedrock mat�erials devoid of vegetation,topsoil and oversized rocks. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Free water was cncounter�d during our exploration,and it has be�n our experience in the ares.that�ocal perched groundwater can develop diuing times o;f heavy precigitation or seasonal runoff and groundwater level can rise during spring runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can also create a perched condirion. We recoinmend beIow-g�rade construdion,svch as retaining walls, crawlspace and base�nent areas,be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an undeadrain systezn. � The drains should consist of drainpipc placed near the bottom of the wall bac�ll surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drains should be placed at each level of excavation azkd at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a nainimum 1%to a suitable gravity outlet. Interior lateral drains below the baseanent floor slabs on about l 5 to 20 feet spacing should be included as part of the wnderdra�n system. The interior lateral drains should be a minimunn 1 foot below the floor slab elevation and conneet with the perimeter drain systern. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system shouId contain less than 2%passizig the No. 204 sieve,less than 50%passing the No.4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain grave�backfill should be at least 2 feet deep and extend to abave groundwater seepage level in the adjace�t excavadon cut face. � Job No. 109 428A �� -9- STI'E GRADING � There is a risk of construction-induced slope instability at the site due to the relatively deep cuts plarmed along the upslope side of the site. We e�cpect groundwate,�seepage wil� be encountered in the deeper cuts. The cut slopes should be laid back to a stable grade or shored. AlI fi11 should be properly placed and oompacteci to limit settleme�ts aad distress to facilities constructed on the fill. Relatively deep fill,up to about 14 feet above existing ground surface,is planned in the upper part of the lot foar the access drives. Some settlement of this fill and other deepe�r fills in the range of%s to 1%of the fiIl depth, d�entling on the mat,erial type and conapaction,should be expected. In general,for fills consisting of the on-site granular soils or well bzoken bedrock mat�ials compacted to at least 95%of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moist�re coatent we estimate fill settlements of 1%of the fill depth. For fills consisting of�well graded imported materiais such as aggregate base course, cflmpacted to at least 104%of the . maximum standard Proctor density near aptimum moistvze content,we estimate filI settlements of�4%of the fill depth. AccordingIy,for fills greater than about 8 feet deep � that will have movement sensitive facilities constructed on them,we rec�mmend use of imported aggregate base course and oompaction to at least 100°/a standard�'roctor d�nsity to limit the potential settlements. Placement of the fill early izx the construction seqnence to allow for some settlement of the fill prior the facilities being constructed on ihe fill sl�ould he considec�. A light weight backfill material such as expanded rigid foam may also be feasable to�imit settl�nent and earth loading on the structures, Prior to fill placement,the subgrade should be carefuliy prepared by removing all e�cisting fill,vegetation and topsoil and compacting to at least 95%of the maximum standard Proctor density. The fill should be benched into the portions of the hillside exceeding 20'�0�ade. C�roundwater and soft subgrade conditions could be e�vountered requiring dewatering and subgzade stabilization prior to the fill placement. Perniane�t unretained cut and fill s�opes should be graded at 2 horizontal to I vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation or other means. T`he risk of slope � Job No.109 428A � - 10- instability will be increased if scepage is encot�ntered in cuts and flatter slapes may be � necessary. If se�page is encountered in permanent cuts,an investigation ahould be conducted to detennine if the seepage will adversely at�'ect the cut stability. We should review site grading plans for the project prior to construction. SURFACE DRAINAGE ' The following drainage precautions should be observed duning constniction and � maintained at all times after the building has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exteriar backfill should be adjusted to near optamum moisture and � compacted to at 2east 95%of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement�nd slab areas and to at least 90%of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surfacc surrounding the exterior of the buildiung should be sloped to drain away from the foundaUion in all directions. We � recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 1Q feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 fi�t in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site finer graded soils to reduce sur�ace water infiltration. 4) Roof d.ownspouts and drains shonld discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 5 feet from foundation wa�ls. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generaJly accepted geotechnical engineeriug principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no wanranty either express or irnplied. The conclusions a�d recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory boring drilled at the location indicated on Figure 1,the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our Job No.109 428A �,��,1,� - 11 - services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or � other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include extrapolation ofthe subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory boring and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re- evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of o�information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical � engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - L;I��Q��HNIGAL, INC. �� REr,j�, �� .� � ' : � �e 2's = 0 David A. Young, �� $2.2i6 � ,� r�t�-ra . Reviewed by: '�ii �'�AI. �``~ `��<<ht�IH��,`` "�� Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. DAY/kac � Job No. 109 428A �� APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1�s� i �i � i '' � r �� ' y� '�I,�er�°� � ��r j � ��' /'� I � I / �-��' ROPOS�D � �� SECONDARY � I �� D�PLEX f � � l � /� �o� t PROPOSED � 1 LOT 2 PRIiuIARY � DUPLDC I � i1 � r � i� ^� � LOT 3 ! � LOT 4 � ` ` � �Q PP�OPOSED B[ACK 2 � � � 1 � \ �smnvcE � � � � v � �" � � �s�o�sr xo�►n er�o � `�\� �D�, ��, � r J � 1 \ � i a _1. �� 1 ` \ +�r-� � 1� 1——� '�'G� /� ' ex�o E70STlVC l�AI��(3 SNN.L ��/� � � e?a0 ,�-BO ItT IVG i _ --� -� / � �.�.fl,,� , -� �� PARI�YG � -�— FaORES?E�OAD—� �09 428A C LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINC FIGURE 1 � t�+wo�c��rr�u. � BORING 1 EL.EV.=8239.4' �� 8240 � 47/72 g�5 WC=7.7 +4=22 -200-22 �,; � 9✓12 8230 � WC=9.5 m � -200=25 LL C 11�•11 ' :f �=6 � � � 8225 �2 g�r� tu WC=17.9 DD=113 25/� 1� 100V7 8220 10N1 8220 8215 8215 NOTE:Explanation of symbols is shown on Fgure 3. i 09 42$A �'�� OG OF DCPLORATORY 60RING Figure 2 FtrlwoKn+Pwrvwc G�o�cw LEGEND: � ASPHALT PAVEMEIV7;about 3(rxFies thick � � FILL;man-placed dayey silty sand with gra�rel ar�d sr,atte�ed cobbles, medium dense,moi�,brown to dark brovm. �r_r"�.� SAND(SC-SM);dayey,siity,scattered gravel, toose,moist to very moist with�pth,brown,low plastic flnes. � � WEATHERED CLAYSTONE SHALE; medium hard,law Uo mdium p(asticity,very rnoist,gre�-brawn. � L.IMESTONE BEDROCK;fraciured,hard�o very hard,moist,grey,Mirrtum Formation. � Relatively undistur�d dri�ne sampie:2-inch LD.Calffomia liner sample. t"' � Drive sample;standard penetration test(SP�, 1 3/8 ir�ch I.D.spfrt spoon sample,ASTM-1586. 41/i2 dri��e blow oour�t;indicates thaR 41 blows of a 140 pound hamme�r falling 30 iriches w�re required to dr(ve the Cal�rnia or St'T sampler 12 inches. �_� Free wa#er levei in bori az�d r�umber of _ ng an days tollawing driflirg measu�ement was taken. � --> �epth at which boring ha�d caved aA�en chedced on Jarx�auy t 1,2014. -�r- Prsdic�l drilting refusal. � NQTES: t. The e�loratory baring was drilied on January 6,2010 wfth a 4inch diameter cominuous flight pow�er�ger and bacic fllfed on�anuary 11,ZOiO, 2. Loption of the exptoratory boring was measured appro�amately by pacing from features stio�wr�on the site pian provided. 3. The exploratory boring elevatlon was obtained by inshurr�nt levv�eff�d refers to e�dsting duplac matn floor deck efevation of 8233.7 feet,as pravided. 4. The exploratory borfng loc;afion and elevatlon shoutd be considered ac.curate onty fo the degree implied by tt� I rnethod used. � 5. The lines be�tw�een materlals shown nn the expiorafory bo�ing log reptesent the appro�amate boundaries between material types end transiitbons may be graduai. n 6. Wa�er level re�dings showr�on the log were made at the fime and urxier the concfitions in�cated. Fluctuation in a water level may occu�wiih time. 7.Laboratory Testing Results: WC=Water ConteM(9b) -200= Percent passFng No.200 sieve �� ° �Y��Y�t� LL= Liquid Limit(96) +4= Perc�t retained on the No.4 sieve P(= p�a�ipty�nde�C�96� 109 428�°► LEGEND AND NQTES Figure 3 [-IEPMCRfM�PAMLAK 6�A�. II � Moistu�e Conbent= 17.9 percent Dry Density= 713 pcf Sample of: Weathered Claystate Shale � Fran: Boring 1 at 14 Feet 0 1 � u'� 0 � � �' 1 a E U E%�S�0�1 upon w�tting � o.� t.a �o �w APPLJm PRESSU�iE-ksf 109 428A �'7� C�''� SWEL1-CONSOLIDATION TEST RE�ULTS Figure 4 HB+woRnr�wwt,AK Gl071➢CNNIC,AL � .�._� �i e� � -,� •.-. �. r �� ••� � , iT , � :� �r ,r� �� :� i �� .... . . � . . . �.�.��..��.. �.,..�� ..r.� � ��.��..��. � .��..�� ,.� �� . ��...�..�� .�r..��.��.....� �..�....��.�� n.��.�..�� ■�� ....�.. �. ��.,.��■ ��■� �■ ��..+.��.�� 1 ��i �.r.w..`. �� wr=ww�w� •� �� r�� i�� r�� 'r� �� i �� i�l� ��r\�� —�� `� ��A��Y�i — ' �� M� ��Irr' �� •{ �� r� s .�� i� � �s��i�� M �� I�Rw�� il�� A�� Y� �� — �Y�� I� ��1�1^I�1�� A�Y�� oI� A� �� r�� Y�� i� ��III�YAAI��1 ��r� ��r� �� r� ��IIIrt i� �� —��r �� r�— ��S��rs�� I��Yr�� IY�� I ��== �� r�1�� 1��1� �� I�� r ��1w�� #��'�� IS�Y rs �� 1 I�� i��ir�� 1�� r—�� 'i�A� �� r�� rr�rw��rr�. � �� ww�� .1 ��= �� rr�a�= .1 �� Yb\�� ir�� r� �� -- �A�� i ��ti� �� 1�� 1 rw� �� t� �� 1�1�� A A�i� �� t��!`� �� Y�� .� :1 �� rrr i..�w��w�w �� rA� �� i��r�� rra� ��r�� ir �� = �� r� �w��r� �� r� �� ,� � r� ,+��rrir. .+ra��w�w��r�rr � �w r.�� rrrr�r�� r��ww�� rr� �� r��r�r��r� �� a� ��r�� w�� .� � � �� r rrr� �� w � �� ti�� :.1 �r�� r� ��r �� I�I��r� ==�� Y�� I��I�I��Y�� 1�� I��I �� IA��ir� ��sirY�i�� A��r�� s��w�� '1 �� .� �w��i��r.�+r�� 1 �� — �� r �� w��rir ��i� a� �rr� �� r �� AS�� .��r� �� y� � � �� w�� 11 ��i.�r� �_��=��a�� i�/ 11+ /1. 11.' 1 /S i '1 /1 :11 ' — ' � —_—IK �. 7' � t ^'q ��„ '�C:;-��:�"��'-`:>� ! � � ♦ ! � �� • !�. � r '• :� • �� • � V I �. « ' � ' � � • � � a� � � N � � a '3 � 0 0� .� ,� s � � c oo � � � � p �W 'n �+~'" 'y � � � � � �' � � � � a oW LL�n 2�� tp � �� z J �° _ � V � � ~z � �a Z N � �— _ u� H m ~ � � �� c � W 0 Q �� N � � a �c w oc �,o g � o �Z Q la— � ��a� N N � a � �+- = O n o a � � � � a g o W a � , = v=j nQ � c� � N O ~ M �OZ � a W � z o �� m n ,�, o� aoo � °` � 2�t) z �a � � '� � 0 � � � z � � 00 m [Type te�t] ��t/�� p � � D � � � � 7'own af Veil APR 2 3 2010 0�'��C COPY TOWN OF VAfL Tree Preservation Plan For 375 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado March, 2010 Prepared by: Rick Herwehe A Cut Above Forestry Ceres Design and Arborscapes www.acutaboveforestry.com 37i Forest Road 3/18/2010 � Tree Preservation Plan 1 [T}�pe teat] � Summary On February 22, 2010, Mike Foster of Triumph Development contracted A Cut Above Forestry (Ceres Design and Arborscapes) to develop a Tree Preservation Plan in preparation for a construction project at 375 Forest Road in Vail, Colorado. The project includes removing the existing single family structure and replacing it with a new duplex. The project will include removing 8 trees larger than 10 inches in diameter and several small seedlings and saplings. Seven trees designated for removal are in the foot print of are very close to the edge of excavation and will lose structural stability due to root loss. One tree was found to have stem rot significant enough to require removal. The remaining trees will be treated to improve current health and condition and construction impacts will be mitigated throughout the process. Introduction History On February 22, 2010, Mike Foster of Triumph Development contracted A Cut �i, � Above Forestry (Ceres Design and Arborscapes) to develop a Tree Preservation Plan in preparation for a construction project at 375 Forest Road in Vail, Colorado. Kathy Alto, the lead landscape architect on the project, provided me with a site plan for the proposed project. The house placement is roughly identified on the ' ground with wooden surveyor laths. The Triumph Development project will included an extensive reconstruction including the demolition of the existing structure and construction of a larger duplex. The driveway will be moved to the west and extend descend into the garages and parking area in front of the new duplex. If new underground utilities must be installed they will be in the drive. The disturbed areas will be landscaped with boulders, trees, native shrubs and grasses. Assignment and Purpose The purpose of this plan is to provide tree preservation and management guidelines for the property owners and their contractors. The guidelines will address tree preservation measures to retain healthy native trees all around the redevelopment. 375 Forest Road 3/18/2010 � Tree Presen�ation Plan 2 [T��pe text] � The goals of the plan are: 1. Minimize damage to the residual trees. 2. Insure residual trees will maintain quality and continue as assets to the landscape well into the future. 3. Minimize the creation of hazard trees during the construction process. Present Tree and Site Condition The site is located at 375 Forest Road in Vail, Colorado. Currently the site is occupied by a single family home built in the early 1970's. The house has an asphalt parking pad directly off of Forest Road and stairs leading to the front entrance. The existing structure is surrounded by three developed lots to the east, west and north. The property slopes to the north from Forest Road at an approximate 10% grade with a northern aspect. A small open waterway runs along the east side of the property. All trees greater than 8.0" in diameter are identified on the site map. Each tree that is outside of the building footprint was inventoried and assigned an identification number. The trees are marked with numbered, blue flags and identified on the site plan prepared on March 10, 2010 by Paul Heading of Land Design by Ellison (Ceres Design and Arborscapes). � Colorado Spruce (Picea pungens) and Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta) are the only tree species found on the site. Trees on the site vary in height from approximately 35 to 95 feet in height. Tree diameters range from 8.0 inches to 28.0 inches'. Tree diameters are measured at 4.5' above the ground (diameter standard height). -1."'_-, >"4 Crown radius, the distance from the bole of the i � �~�"� ?f - -- � t r e e t o t h e e d g e o f t h e b r a n c h e s, a.k.a. t h e �,� �'��- .T _ dripline, varies from 5-feet to 1 0-feet. T he �'�� '�' � dripline is an indicator of the root system. � �.0 Although roots typically e�end far beyond the � _�. dripline, a high concentration of absorbing roots � � - is typically present between the dripline and the � _ ~ 1�• l.. � ��`'�"'� r � trunk. t ' �.____.�_- , � Crown ratios vary from a high of 90% to a low of _ , _ _ _ 30%. Crown ratio is an important indicator to tree health and vigor. A low crown ratio means the tree has less green foliage to perform produce food. Generally, we can assume the less food production, the weaker the plant and the less likely it is to survive the stress of construction. � 37�Porest Road 3/1 R/2010 � Tree Preservation Plan 3 [Tvt�teht) � Live Crown = 50 feat Total Height = 80 feet Live Crcn�m Ratio = 50 feet = � �� SO feet � The soils around the house likely have urbanized characteristics such as compaction, lacking organic matter inputs, bacterial dominated and poorly drained. The aforementioned characteristics are uncommon in the soils of native conifer forests. A summary of the tree characteristics and condition inventory can be seen in the following table. 37�Forest Road 3/18/2010 � Tree Preser��ation Plan 4 [Type teYt] � . . -- .- - �: _. . . - 15S Slight sweep in trunk. 1 CS 28" 90 11N* 90% Scale insects are present 10S Fork at 20 feet above ground. 2 LP 20" 70 10N 40% 10S Scale insect is present 3 CS 26" 80 15N 80% 7S Slight crook in trunk 4 CS 8" 35 7N 80% Scale insects are present 115 Scaleinsectsare present 5 CS 20" 95 11N 90% 135 Scaleinsects are present Hollow sound when subject to mallet test. Evidence stem rot found. 3 inches of solid wood on north side 6 CS 22" 95 6N 60% of tree 12S Scale insects are present 25% lean to west. No rot but roots system 7 CS 24" 90 10N 80% development may be inhibited by tree 6 to east. 125 Scaleinsects are present � Suspicious noise during mallet test but core on 8 CS 26" 90 12N 90% south side yielded sound wood 13S Scal�e insects are present 9 CS 27" 90 12N 85% Healing would at root collar 145 25% lean to south 10 CS 25" 85 5N 40% Scale insects are present 5S Dead fork at 3 feet above root collar 11 LP 15" 70 5N 25% Scale insects are present 55 Scaleinsects are present 12 CS 14" 50 5N 40% Epicormic branching on trunk. N arrow crown with 4S thin foliage 13 CS 17" 70 4N 30% Scale insect are present Epicormic branching on trunk, Narrow crown with 8S thin foliage 14 CS 22" 75 8N 40% Scale insect are present 11S Fork at 20 feet above ground. 15 CS 18" 65 11N 50% Scale insects are present � orest oa _ � � Tree Presen•ation Plan � [T��pe te�t] � . . .- �: .. . . 12S Scaleinsects are present Past root loss possible since tree is very close to 16 CS 20" 75 13N 80% neighbor's house. 14S Scale insects are present 17 CS 21" 80 11N 65% 4S Flat root collar on south side. 18 CS 20" 80 10N 60% Scale insects are present 205 Foliage volume is skewed to south side of crown. 19 CS 23" 80 4N 60% Scale insects are present 95 Trees 20 and 21 originate from a common base and 20 CS 10" 60 9N 40% fork at 3 feet above the root collar. 9S Scale insect are present on Trees 20 and 21 21 CS 12" 60 9N 40% Testing and Analysis I collected condition information using the Colorado Tree Coalition Condition Reference as a guide. This procedure involves inspecting and evaluating five � structural components on each tree. Each component is given a rating between 0 (severe damage) to 5 (no damage). A summary of each tree evaluated on the property is contained in the following table. Condition Point Ratin 23-25 Excellent 19-22 Good 15-18 Fair 11-14 Poor 5-10 Very Poor All spruce trees on the site are heavily infested with Pine Needle Scale (Chionaspis pinifoliae). At the time of my visit the site was covered with snow so I was unable to evaluate the root collar and soil condition around the trees. 37�Forest Road 3/18/2010 � Tree Presen�ation Plan 6 [T��pe te�t] � Tree Condition Ratin s Table 2 1 3 4 4 4 3 18 Slight sweep in trunk 2 4 2 3 4 3 17 Fork at 20 feet above ground 3 4 4 4 4 3 19 4 4 4 4 4 3 19 Slight crook in trunk 5 4 4 4 4 3 19 6 3 1 3 4 3 14 Stem rot 7 3 3 4 4 3 17 25%lean to west. No rot but roots system development may be inhibited by tree 6 to east. 8 4 4 4 4 3 19 9 4 4 4 4 3 19 Healing would at root collar 10 3 4 4 4 3 18 25%lean to south 11 3 4 4 4 3 18 Dead fork at 3 feet above root collar 12 3 4 4 4 3 18 13 4 4 4 4 3 19 Epicormic branching on trunk. Narrow crown with thin foliage 14 4 4 4 4 3 19 Epicormic branching on trunk. Narrow crown with thin foliage 15 4 4 4 4 3 19 16 4 4 4 4 3 19 Past root loss possible since tree is very close � to neighbor's house. 17 4 4 4 4 3 19 18 3 4 4 4 3 18 Flat root collar on south side 19 4 4 3 4 3 18 Foliage volume is skewed to south side of crown. 20 4 3 4 4 3 18 Trees 20 and 21 originate from a common base and fork at 3 feet above the root collar. 21 4 3 4 4 3 18 Construction Impacts Most trees on the site will be either directly or indirectly impacted by the project. The indirect effects include changes in water from grade adjustments, chemicals leaching into the soil and changes in local wind patterns due to lot clearing. Direct impacts are those activities that invade the critical root zone the crown, the trunk or require the tree to be removed. This construction project will directly impact approximately 9 trees ranging from 12 to 26 inches in diameter by removal. The project will encroach upon the critical root zone of 7 trees. The remaining trees on the lot will be exposed to minor impacts from changed run-off, changes in local wind patterns and potential changes in pH and chemical leaching. 375 Forest Road 3/18/2O10 � Tree Preservation Plan 7 [T}�pe te�-t] �nstruction Impacts Table 3 - .- - �: •. - . . �. Excavation and fill will occur within the Root Protection Zone. 1 CS 28" Approximately 15%of RPZ to north is occupied by the existing house. Design and soil shoring will require excavation to within 18 inches of the root 2 LP 20" collar on three sides. Design and soil shoring will require excavation to within 18 inches of the root 3 CS 26" collar on three sides. Excavation and rock retaining wall will encroach into the RPZ on east side of the tree. Some crown pruning in the lower 1/3 of crown will be necessary.Tree will experience minor rot loss on 4 CS 8" east side Excavation for northern house wall and will require excavation within RPZ on south side of tree and fill I for flagstone patio will include fill installed within the RPZ on the west side of tree#5 5 CS 20" Indirect impacts from construction but mallet test performed during inventory indicated possible. 6 CS 22" stem rot. Core sample confirmed only 3 inches of sound wood and estimated 21 inches of rot. Fill inside of the RPZ on the south side. 7 CS 24" Direct impacts include root loss on the east side of the tree. Excavation will extend 2-3 feet into the RPZ.Some branch 8 CS 26" loss on the east side of the crown. Potential direct to trunk and root collar from drive way construction. Fill over root system on south side of tree. 9 CS 27" indirect impacts include changes in water flow due to regarding of driveway. No direct and possible minor indirect impacts are anticipated for tree#10 10 CS 25" No direct and possible minor indirect impacts are anticipated for tree#11 11 LP 15" No direct and possible minor indirect impacts are anticipated for tree#12 12 CS 14" The retaining wall and fill for the drive may encroach into the north side of the RPZ for tree#13. 13 CS 17" The retaining wall and fill for the drive will encroach into the north side of the RPZ for tree#14. 14 CS 22" The retaining wall and fill for the drive will encroach into the north side of the RPZ for tree#14. 15 CS 18" Some branch loss likely for access pruning Minor indirect impacts from construction may occur from soil disturbance,grading and changes is surface water flow 16 CS 20" Minor indirect impacts from construction may occur from soil disturbance,grading and changes is 17 CS 21" surface water flow. 37�Forest Road 3/1R/20]0 � Tree Presen�ation Plan 8 [Type test] .- �: �. - . . �. - Minor indirect impacts from construction may occur from soil disturbance,grading and changes is surface water flow 18 CS 20" Minor indirect impacts from construction may occur from soil disturbance,grading and changes is surface water flow 19 CS 23" Minor indirect impacts from construction may occur from soil disturbance,grading and changes is surface water flow 20 CS 10" Minor indirect impacts from construction may occur from soil disturbance,grading and changes is surface water flow 21 CS 12" Tree condition, age and species all affect how well a tree will stand up to construction stress. Trees that are already in poor health from disease, insect damage, soil compaction, nutrient deficiencies, overcrowding or being overtopped are a serious disadvantage when it comes to surviving construction stress. Young trees are generally adaptable and have a better chance at surviving the � environmental changes that occur during construction. Trees live on an energy cycle that produces a surplus of energy during the summer months and a deficit in the spring during bud break. Young and middle aged trees in the growth and structural stage generally produce an adequate amount of energy to grow and provide defenses against insects, disease and environmental stresses. At least for one or two growing seasons assuming the stresses and damages are not too server. As trees reach the mature and overmature stages of their lives, they are only producing enough energy to break the buds in the following growing season. Any root loss causing a reduction in stored energy or absorption capabilities will likely result in rapid decline and eventual death for the tree. Tree species respond differently to construction impacts. Englemann spruce trees are similar to Colorado spruce trees in that they are moderately tolerant of root loss and somewhat tolerant of saturated soils but soil compaction will cause a slow death to roots. Therefore any activity within the tree protection zone should be avoided, If encroachment is necessary all operations should be closely monitored. A particular problem with root damage is that its effects may take many years to surface and the results may be in the form of catastrophic tree failure due to root and stem rot or poorly developed root systems. Table 4 outlines the existing trees and the potential impacts of construction. 37�Forest Road 3/18/2010 � Tree Preservation Plan 9 [Type teYt] � Mitigation Measures The three basic approaches to tree preservation during construction are to first try to avoid the tree (staying outside of the tree protection zone), second is to minimize any damage the tree and third is to mitigate any effects the construction process may have on the tree. Typically, the healthier the tree, the more likely it is to remain a productive, contributing part of the landscape for many years after the project is completed. The best management approach is to bring the trees to the best possible health and condition prior to starting the construction project. This can be done by insuring adequate soil moisture for as long as possible prior to construction, testing the soil and applying fertilizer if necessary, inoculating the soil with mycorrhizae fungi and root stimulating fertilizer. In some cases thinning to reduce competition or pruning to improve tree architecture are the best management practices to improve health Mycorrhizae is a naturally occurring fungal relationship between tree roots and the soil. This relationship is common in undisturbed forest soils but, soil that has been "urbanized " through development, pedestrian traffic and other human disturbances often lacks this relationship. Mycorrhizae literally means fungus root. The roots and fungi form a symbiotic relationship that provides a secondary and very expansive root system for the host tree. The mycorrhizae relationship can multiply a tree's absorbing capacity form 10 to 1000 times the capabilities of non mycorrhizal trees. Studies have demonstrated a well colonized mycorrhizal root system is more tolerant of drought, soil salinity, soil pathogens, parasitic nematodes and chemical imbalances in the soil. Mycorrhizal filaments produce humic compounds and organic "glues" that bind soils into aggregates and improve soil porosity. Soil porosity and soil structure positively influence the growth of trees by promoting aeration, water movement into soil, and root growth that more closely mimic the soil condition in the natural forest setting. The second concern is to identify, protect and treat the critical root zone (crz) throughout the construction process. To protect the crz, delineate it with fencing and install a 4-inch layer of chips on top of the existing soil (See specifications section). Unfortunately, construction space constraints do not always allow protection of the recommended crz (See table 4 for the desired tree protection zone size). In these cases, individual prescriptions are prepared for the trees to address the problems created by disturbing the root zone. 375 Forest Road 3/18/2010 � Tree Fresen�ation Plan 10 [Type teYt] � Root Protection Zones ... • Table 4 .. • . - . _. • . - . - �: ' - -- �: . - 26' 10' 1 11N 28" 28 11 5N 15" 15' 20' 10' 2 lON 20" 20 12 5N 14" 14' 25' 8' 3 15N 26" 26' 13 4N 17" 17' 14' 16' 4 7N 8" 8' 14 8N 22" 22' 22' 22' 5 11N 20" 20' 15 11N 18" 18' 19' 25' 6 6N 22" 22' 16 13N 20" 20' 22' 25' 7 10N 24" 24' 17 11N 21" 21' 24' 14' 8 12N 26" 26' 18 10N 20" 20' 25' 24' � 9 12N 27" 27' 19 4N 23" 23' 19' 18' 10 5N 25" 25' 20 9N 10" 10' 18' 21 9N 12" 12' 375 Forest Road 3/18/2010 � Tree Presen�ation Plan 1 1 [Type test] � The specific needs of each inventoried tree are outlined in table 5. S ecifications for Tree Preservation -- - . . General All remaining spruce trees shall be treated for pine needle scale in early summer. Guidelines All remaining trees outside of the Building envelop should be inoculated with mycorrhizae fungi and treated with a root stimulating fungi. Unless otherwise specified,the critical root zone (or as much as possible)shall be fenced with chain link panels. The fenced area shall be covered with a 4"layer of tree chips. Any excavation in the crz shall be supervised by a certified arborist. Any roots greater than 1/2 inch in diameter shall be pruned with a sharp tool and documented. Any branches that may interfere with construction should be pruned by an arborist prior to construction. "Claw hammer pruning" by the construction crew is prohibited. In addition to the general guidelines the following trees will need additional mitigation measures. Route driveway outside of minimum sized RPZ. Protect RPZ with chain link fencing and prohibit storing material, pedestrian traffic and parking within RPZ. Continue 1 to check soil moisture and add supplemental water when necessary 2 Remove 3 Remove 4 Protect with fencing Protect minimum RPZ with fencing. Prune branches to accommodate construction 5 on south side of tree 6 Remove 7 Evaluate root system after tree#6 is removed. Protect minimum RPZ with fencing. Prune branches to accommodate construction 8 on east side of tree Protect uphill side of tree from soil migration and rolling rocks. Use silt fencing on 9 uphill side 10 Follow General Guidelines 11 Follow General Guidelines 12 Follow General Guidelines 13 Protect RPZ 14 Protect minimum RPZ from back fill on north side of tree. Protect minimum RPZ from backfill on north side of tree. Prune branches to 15 accommodate access 16 Follow General Guidelines 17 Follow General Guidelines lg Follow General Guidelines 19 Follow General Guidelines 20 Follow General Guidelines 21 Follow General Guidelines 375 Forest Road 3/18/2010 � Tree Presen�ation Plan 12 [Type test] � Fertilizing 1. Deep root feed all spruce and pine trees to be preserved. 2. Feed with a root stimulating fertilizer. 3. Feeding will be performed in a radiai pattem with the feeder needle being inserted 8-10" below the soil surface. Insertions will be made at 18" intervals on the edge of the drip line. 4. The first feeding shall include an inoculation with mycorrhizae fungi. Fencing 1. Fence all trees to be retained to completely enclose the tree protection zone, as indicated in table 3 and the accompanying staging plan map, pnor to clearing or grading. Chain link fencing panels shall be installed to protect the critical root zone. Fences will remain until construction is completed. Fencing on the uphill side of trees and the downhill side of excavation, will be reinforced with silt fence or hay bales to minimize soil migration beyond the fence line. 3. Construction traffic and material storage must remain outside of the fenced areas at all times. Prunin 9 1. A. Prune dead branches from trees on drive and around house. B. Prune branches to provide adequate clearance for scaffolding and construction crew. 2. Pruning shall be performed or supenrised by a certified arborist. The tree service must provide proof of insurance for liability and workers compensation. 3. All pruning will be within the Tree Pruning Guidelines (International Society of Arboriculture) and adhere to American National Standard for Tree Care Operations (ANSI A300) 4. Any additional tree pruning needed for clearance will be performed by an arborist, and not by construction personnel. 375 Forest Road 3l18/2010 � Tree Freservation Plan 13 [Type text] � Root Pruning 1. All encountered roots over 1/2 inch in diameter will be cut off with a sharp tooL 2. Root will be pruned with a sharp shovel, saw or by-pass pruning tool. 3. Root pruning will be performed prior to stumping and grubbing. 4. Root pruning shall be performed or supervised by a certified arborist. 5. Roots should be exposed by hand, with an air spade or with a small excavator. Any digging to expose roots shall be done parallel to the tree to avoid breaking or tearing roots. General 1. Any activity within the tree protection zone must be approved and monitored by the Consulting Arborist. 2. Any herbicides placed under paving materials must be safe for use around trees and labeled for that use. � 3. Any grading, construction, demolition or other work that may encounter tree roots should be monitored by the Consulting Arborist. 4. Do not store or dump excess soil chemicals, debris equipment or other materials within the tree protection zone. 5. Install and maintain a 4"-6" layer of mulch within the tree protection zone. The mulch will help reduce soil compaction and moderate soil temperature. Monitoring Tree Health and Compliance Successful tree preservation programs start during the planning phase when critical design decisions are made. However, activities in the construction and ' post-construction phases are critical to successful tree preservation. In other words, trees cannot be preserved during construction but they can be killed during construction. Monitoring tree health and compliance during construction helps ensure that the program and details specified in this Tree Preservation Plan are properly implemented. The monitoring phase of the plan is fourfold: 1) Maintain the integrity of the Tree Protection Zone, 2) Assist with field changes, 3) Continually 37�Forest Road 3/18/2010 � Tree Preser�ation Plan 14 [T}•pe test] � evaluate tree health and injuries, and 4) Communicate with the Superintendent, , The Developer, Landscape Architect and the Town of Vail Planning Department. Inspections will be more frequent during the early phases of the project. During the excavation phase and the early stages of material delivery and staging, inspections will occur weekly or bi-weekly. After the kinks are worked out, inspections will occur on a monthly basis or upon request of the contractor, architect, owner or building department. Inspections will be document on form 1-4 and copies made available to the Triumph Development and RA Nelson. � 37�Forest Road 3/18/?O10 � Tree Fresen�ation Plan 15 [Type tett] � Reference Certified Arborist Certification Proaram Studv Guide. International Society of Arboriculture, 1991 Matheny, Nelda P. and James R. Clark. Trees and Development, A Technical quide to Preservation of Trees During Land Development. Intemational Society of Arboriculture, 1997. Shigo, A.L. A New Tree Bioloqy. Duram, NH, Shigo and Trees, 1986. J.M. Sillick & W.R. Jacobi. Healthy Roots and Healthy Trees. Colorado State University. College of Forestry and Natural Resources. http://www.ext.colostate.edulPUBS/garden/02926.html � 375 Forest Road 3/18/2010 � Tree Presen�ation Plan 16 [Type te�t] � Glossary Crook Abrupt bend in a tree or log Crown The upper part of a tree, including the branches and foliage. Crown diameter(Dripline) The distance from the trunk of the tree to the edge of the branches. DSH or Diameter Standard Height The diameter of a tree measured at 4.5 feet above the ground. Epicormic branching Describes new growth (buds, shoots, or flowers) borne on the old wood of trees Live Crown Ratio The percent of the tree trunk that supports live green foliage. � Mycorrhizae Mycorrhizae are organs made up of tree and fungus tissues that facilitate the absorption of phosphorus-containing ions and others essential elements for growth. B) Non-woody roots that are infected by beneficial fungi are called mycorrhizae. Mycorrhizae are organs that facilitate the absorption of phosphorus and other soil elements as well as water. Mycorrhizae (sometimes written as mycorrhizae (singular) and mycorrhizae, {plural) are active for months to a year. They are organs on most trees. Pruning The selective removal of woody plant parts of any size using saws, pruners, clippers or other pruning tools. Roots (absorbing) Absorbing tree roots are organs that absorb free water and elements dissolved in it from the soil. Non-woody absorbing roots have very little 375 Forest Road 3/1 R/2010 � Tree Preservation Plan ]7 [Type te�t] ,I � lignin and no corky outer bark. Woody roots have lots of lignin and a corky outer bark. Non-woody roots do grow in winter in non-frozen soils, and may even grow in non-frozen soils below frozen soils. Also see root hairs and mycorrhizae which are associated with non-woody roots. Roots wood ( Yl Woody tree roots are organs that support the tree mechanically, store energy reserves, transport free water and the substances dissolved in it and synthesis substances such as growth regulators, amino acids and vitamins that are essential for growth. They also hold water in the form of bound water. They also contain more lignin than non-woody roots. Swee p Gradual bend in a standing tree or in a log, pole, or piling. � 37�Forest Road 3/18/2010 � Tree F'reservation Plan 1 R [T�pe text] � 375 Forest Road A Cut Above Forestry Inspection Summary P.O. 7133 Breckenridge, CO 80424 453-9154 Inspection Development Stage , Date: Pre-construction Demolition/stripping Inspector: Rough grading Street, utilities Also present: Building construction Fine-grading/landscaping General comments: Other Site Conditions Tree# Conditions/concerns Treatments required � Recommendations and Follow-up 375 Forest Road 3/18/2010 � Tree Preservation Plan 19 � . � , - ", __ � 4 �:, . -, ►� ,r, ;� ; _ -_�- ' � .,�.- . � `w' - " s . �A-!�'. , �'� �:_ .• � y:i.. . . � , +e a ' ' .. . � � �� : _,,� . t, :.�`,,,;,,� ��` - -=:� +, -''. � :�` ''u ,,. '��. '�J�.-<'�±�e ,�. , a� • ..: � _ �i_, • � ,�+�' - ;.y� 4 .;�-. r;;� `�.. ` >ai►'�`�r. ,"i �, � �r��- � .,•�,d,t= } * .,3. �.._ r a ' Y �.. . �.� ". . ' � � Ri '.f�_ • Y - . _ ly��T U. � � _ . . _ �. . _.i`i.� E: ' - ' � . T .y . .i.'.!Y��.. • . � . � _ ... - Y. � " . . {.,r•J1!��.,• .. . - - � _�- � 4 �� ' ' -. . '�`�R .�'�r ' � �-a � � � _ .�. :.1-�...- _� . . _ . . - . -y� - � . , �,_{ '� ',.:..;f�-+id t ,z, -_ . - - � a: ..,� _ .. � ��.r.I.. ,.. ��i'. ,f_� � . _ � . � .. �aR' .zst.�; a y.:." ' � � �' ! b � —^�-' � , �`;� ,��,.. �, -.._5� ,� .e�- �.;,: �� ` , - � j� . _ ., ` V �� u�"� . i�� i�}j: si, � -..�nt �� ` ��rc ;'�y; . . . �.�� i+�-'f's.9. �„,� . �-t. � . � t# ��f��' �r.., a.. '. �> ��°� ..,�'��n'{��F�`•< �> .�".-5< �`€„-`"�nl9�!� . `� j, . �µ �d� ` ��„�r��v `<�: .. �� l�� / � q�� , •' - �C'iR�t�= • .,. .a,`. - . � ��'' � � , � . � . � _ � [Type text] � ��i� k��4�� Y �� fii' �°��3 �� :. , , ��"�� ; � ��:,�. � *°% 'r � "::� �.A .� 15 � �}:� _ + , . � `� � '�''� 5. -,� �� .� . � , . . �.. ,. , �..-. . . . �" }. ;..,�,4 ry� g � .� ��[ x �� .. .. ... .. � „a. . .. _ � , � � �� „aan.<:�� - ° � ' ,�`� �` . > .- • .. . . -�',s::: . . 375 Forest Road 3/18/2010 � Tree Presen�ation Plan 21 [Tti'pe text] � Arborist Qualification Statement Rick Herwehe, the founder of A Cut Above Forestry, Inc has worked in the tree care industry since 1978. He has a Bachelor's Degree in Forest Management with a concentration in Forest Fire Science from Colorado State University. He is an International Society of Arboriculture Certified Arborist and a Registered Member of the American Society of Consulting Arborists. A Cut Above Forestry is a member of the Tree Care Industries Association. Rick has prepared and directed the implementation of wildfire mitigation, vegetation management plans and direct control mountain pine beetle efforts for several homeowners associations and developers including The Towns of Vail and Breckenridge, Vail Resorts and Intrawest, The Squaw Creek Metro District, Highlands at Breckenridge H.O.A., and the Summit County Open Space. Rick has also worked with the Colorado State Forest Service to prepare Forest Stewardship and Forest Agricultural Plans. � 375 Forest Road 3/18/2010 � Tree Preservation Plan 22 � � ��w.R,� � ,�� c�iti�nn � � � �,�•� atl0]I 19�lOd S�Gb�S6E �I� � � b� �� t ��}� ti � � t � � � �� , �� + r i �� ,. � � � 1 ^ ��'� �� I x � � K, f � . � - � � � � , � � ` � � `' 1 � � l � I II N � � Y 7 � , � � ❑� T � O � �� , }t y � V � � ,� t j � � N ' � � � 'l. .�"�j ..'�.1 { � � J � - -"� ! / �. T, f �I�1 �J � � � M, � ELIfi'�VEN� �I O'O�� 6n Corporate Cir.Suites A-C Golde�.CO WINDOWS & DOORS 8oqoiUSA 3a3 z78-3757Te1 3o3 27$-0438 Fax � � � � � � � Soo•360-3990 Toll Free D www.jeld-wen.com Mike Foster Triumph Development APR 2 3 2010 April 14, 2010 TOWN OF VAIL Mike, Please see below for the NFRC certified U-Values for the JELD-WEN Custom Coilection Product line. JW Custom Ciad Operating Casement (Triple Glaze) .28 U-Value .20 SHGC JW Custom Clad Direct Set Fixed (Triple Glaze) .27 U-Value .20 SHGC JW Clad Giiding Patio Door(Dual LowE) .30 U-Value .19 SHGC Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. ��'1N't1 Of Vail Thank you, o�� coPY � Brad A Wri ht 9 � � rage i or s Mike Foster � From: Brad Wright[&adW�jeld-wen.00mj Sent: Friday,April 16,2010 5:36 AM To: Mike Foster,Jason Morley Subject: RE: 395/4Q5 Forest Rd. Mike 8�Jasan, Weiland does not have a NFRC rating completed.Weiland is starting to publish those, the foid(ng doors should have a .45 U-Value. Plectse let me know if I can be of further assistance. Thank You, &ad Wright JELD-WEN Windows and Doors (970) 481-3394 Cellular �970) 871-6799 Office (970j 871-6798 Fax bwright@springsiqs com From: Mike Fosber[maiib�:MikeFCatriumphdev.com] Sent:Thursday,April 15, 2010 9:00 AM To: Brad Wr�ht; 'Jason Morley' Subjec� RE: 395/405 Forest Rd. � Thanks Brad, Jason will we need somethin similar on the Wieland door sy stems??? , 9 Mike Fost�r,Architect,Development Manager Triumph West Development, LLC 8120 Woodmont Avenue suite 800 Bethesda,Maryland 20814 301-657-1112p 303-1175-4413c 303-953-8626f www.triumphdev.com Fr+om: Brad Wright[mailt�:BradW@jead-wen.com] Se�: Wednesday,April 14, 2010 6:55 PM To: Mike Fosber;Jason Moriey Subject: RE: 395/405 Forest Rd. Mike 8�Jason, Please see attached letter regarding U-Values for the Jeld-Wen Custom Collection products.This letter should get you through the TOV permit process. � Obviously, there are a lot of variables to discuss with respect to product type and glazing type. Uitimately,you will likely end up with a mbc of gl4zing types in order to meet the TOV new requ�ements, 4/19/2010 rage�ors this means using both dual low E and tripie glaze. Please�et me know ff I can be of further assistance. � Thank You, &ad Wright JELD-WEN Windows and Doors (970) 481-3394 Cellular (970) 871-6799 Office (970) 871-6798 Fc�x bwrightQspringsips.com Fram: Mike Fosber[mailto:MikeF�triumphdev.�m] Sent: Wednesday,April 14, 2010 5:06 PM To: 7aso� Moriey'; Brad Wright Subject: RE: 395/405 Forest Rd. Really"U"values are what they are fooking for..........along with my window schedule cailing out sizes and egress hardware. Mike Foster,Architect,Oevelopment Manager Triumph West Development, LLC 8120 Woodmont Avenue suite 800 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 301�57-1112p 303-475-4413c 303-953-8626f � www.trium�hdev.com Prom:Jason Morley[maildo:jmorley@ranelson.com] Se�: Wednesday,Aprii 14, 2010 4:39 PM To: Brad Wright Cc: Mike Foster Subject: 395/405 Forest Rd. Brad, We need your help on this project. Can you provide cut sheets on your proposed windows to meet the towns new energy oode. Please cooMinate any questions with Mike Foster. Mike,Do you know what speafications the town is requesting? Thanks, Jason Morley Preconstruction Manager LEED�AP (970)748-5280 Office (970)949-4379 Fax (970)4T1-3919 Celi �morley.�ranelson com ��; R.A.N E L S C� N h�i�[�uGw4ar�iuw�E3e��r��iw..vr+n:ES � R.A. Nelson&Associates,Inc. 51 Eagle Road#2 P.O. Drawer 540U 4/19/2010 � � 0 z G) �� v z��U ' �C �mx°.. 4^� '��° 4� 4m - ° �^`" �°,L"A: ^ � v ��`o`Fs � oa °J �m _�°�.�� 'y'°'°^ °^._mm��_ �n o_ �z n�°:: �m 93 R��^Om o�m ��N 9>pan� :S n A:? n�amnm 3am �o,��F < a�FiF ^ "_ o�� ^� 4>m � °o'"xmong c =�4 > �2 �5' z� > � yo °� °� . �p�.,"m^ _ _ Z ?9�� a� NogF2� �� >m np A �� a 9^��'so,� m� yR o o3' osom°=r'>� ^mv `g � _ �� m� � - -- �d3 A�" ��>g' � >� °� �.��mn� o�� z� _ o�za °8^ �p �3 �_� "=o"m"n� g�4^ m�n'=�� " ° - o'�N� ' m,'�z`��' m" � N�� o�'; � � '. 44 �y�2„ a� _m> nm., s^� = ngR�m>� n>= - �8 4� �,�mom6:o _'pn �2$K=9 8^ �,� �; _�°-,S 8 _�,� 'g N��Oy4 :8 omn � � o�.��^ �2° ^o° oz�'^sR A§8 ^9 onN'°yA °�° F� " »F ` ° - ^06 g2 ` �" _ D � � �>� ,�mm �° a dgm=°s a:� ��' 8�� j n 2'" �> ��"o�°m46 �'F��s� p ;2 �� 1 pmd>'F � �g� ° °mm2 �^ �k` ° �oti �� n�qg> o> ; "ao`om° oE - WF �r„a '�8" Rm: ^ ` . g<>!m� �F a� F � '"'3�,°:QF ov?� �' eFo n� . . ��m €`F �mC ^o�m N'� ni�'" Er �c � - _ �n : 'm o?°�m�o$ €i ga�}^�=p ^n Q .,�� a� B �m^_ �m ,N4� �+� _ _- _ r��m' �'nm mgm<g D>�Ry:� 'po 0o g�m gm o09., _ ° '.�>m�m� �o � 2 N� �A' ➢ _ m �: �N 90 n�° ,�'� � �m sm °,�n a� a` _ � .+. `> y�o m� .A� �n. � o: G 9°�", o� �� J � W � _ gc�g� �"< m�gm� _ ��"�N �Fm m� m°�R;m _ -^"n8= --°�� _ o�a - -o�=mm°�, ➢�. �°moN�m m� rn _ $ ��_ �o ��e_ �� = N�� "m _- n �a� m�ma�o `� aoP �a �om � o€.o�;om> ��:�o spn��m o� o �fn o : � �7m�'y go zm m��,c� sN � P� _ �� _ �g� a�'4 -SM�� a9�qa<� :$' _ _ 3m �og o�fmN �,�, F°� �o° A> D � �o ,F ° �� na�o.� �m °-�� °� ` � ;�aNO n� �a �� m°; `'" a�s��sm r O � ��g "� a _ =g� n� �$�a"� "m �^a �m ,��pm�"s _m� �s�oi �gm°�^'' �"` � � o� ;�` - m's`:°og �g� ^m"�°'� m; Z� ��R _ �^-��: g�m ' -_ ° "' °� �4" �4 �€''"q ��F ,��n� ��">m �,�o Apo n N g Nm� _ =go m=` a_ � _ � n ,£F _ n�R �� F� � mN � _ -�� _ q�m.a� z$° >F�,"` =�°a�� :� �`� 3� �N �op>op>a mo� �`.�4�.� - � �QQ N ?� z �' _ �°�^�� p m � �°� � .�2A qot g� "� -''m �o' �4" n � - °� °"^-m �" � ^ "� a � n� S �m >F � zg n� A�Ny �>Yoa m � z�a7o: p o�.�"s BR (A cp om' - a ";� g a�"m�c �' � o� ` m° �': -r�9� �'°4n^` _ <'�^ ^� �� ^ _o = �a"m; �mm�=� ��' 8 � ' m�� mm �_ � N �� =�� °'^^a >£>sgo ' s a4> "m �o° � m9 04 v £ � _' � m9 �s��F: m � :�; °Fn g=° a�g�^ m�� _' �' N� -c' � o�n�;m°� mo?�s xa�=' a� fn � R ° �$"s�A =€ $a :�m = =$;�N _ - o�>m ��;�Aa° �o ^�' ' �a� ;�m � o�,'° (n — � 7a� ��o£ zm " ��m'" �p �g� � '"'a n sR�'>�oo o��':F ' 'P` ^m O (/�. � N. '^°: _ _ 8 =m° `m �8oe D��2�' ,�$ N�� a��e E _. �.^m �.�: o`O"�' �` o �' � �v '� R� n� mq➢m� � � . N� z �a� �g'm° -oa°„n� :4 �:n ma �n°o`=^nm � �� ^" n ' 00 ;� __ a�� m"om>'� p '�a - _o` __ _ � s '� Eo - � �" �a"m:'mm ��mrm "��"'u" � �' 'O � N �g> g �Fgm �m $g o�mn� m x w�i �° 4'a^° "�?o�' <�>n °-��mo ° �m Q '� °4�go =�o ^�"$� m � � > - z "��° # j � - m - �" �o �� F >� ^�i �� ^zmao° �� - ;a � m N'��"n -z 'g°m a o (� . Q �> p° �m �m '^R�� u . . �, � ,� �� N W �, m� � aR�o � < �m ti m - ,m� v. '" v � . � v � m y o � � n (p �y o N � > > N ,y.. :(7 3 ° � �- d o �I� \ � a � � - �I � � T T � . . . - . fD O 01 > > . �4E y f] C� �' N � N fp . , ;o m ... . _' s�. o> m m � � ti w� \a D r r `� D �1 T O� � . . A � 1 � I., � O � �1� ( � 7 '(� �� v w \' �7$�{. \\\ r \� � � � " � `.�. N';�, \� t_ �� ' � \ , .: ��Y. . ,\5 ��. _ �i_ 1 � � \�� b^�n 1 . . \. / � � � °n r7 $ N�' ��. � � �� 5 1 . ' ;�/ . . ��. � � � �� . . �� C� � � � � W �� / �! � � � �/� 1� _" 15 O. ,�..�I ' / ♦ Vi ,Y � y� . , .-+ , ,.^i. � � . � �� $ � � � �� r�'f � .. �� D t'° �.� ". . . . . ` # , � � . � � �� . � ' . � � ' . _ . . i . . � � � n� r � � � o i' �� O r.. � a � � �� o � �� , � � �� ,� � . � � �� ; � o � �n n. y � � � � � � � � � �',� � n � � ', �'� � �� \ � '� ♦�� a g i;� � _ � � (D � ��tp��I �� — � X � � SU � . . \ ' � � � � � �V - _� � % . . . � - v ' :F � � � � °a `� �� , � ° � � d � ' m� � D � f �� ' , m s y � � � \> � �� l' �-� r' O � .. G � � ,�2 � � � � � � � � � J N � l T � p � \ o T � . O � � �: �1 � ... �`X\ � � . , . ... � ' ''L g � � _ � N _ _ _ _ _ _ � '� 9 rmie ��_�� n � � ��" � ? 3 F 3 � m � � 4 � � � � � � � n a g g � : N g m � 4 Q2009 TRIUMPH WEST Sheet oote-. Stamp Sheet title Revisions: 4-19-10 395 � 405 FOREST ROAD '1'RIIIMPH cRnowc P�aN �flt@f-MOUII'tc7117 s.m..a.orn�e v.0 orroE ,� � P,o,e�� No:,�_��3 WEST a,zo.00d�o�,..�. o,..,,,o.Roea, � , "^��, �o�oR^oo ENGINEERING .°„e a°°o °°;`zo' �-� Dfawn by MM OEl'ELPYEM BeNeetle, LD 20814 Veil, CO BIES'! C%VI�Ef1Q%I1BBI8 Q[$IIlVBy0�3 Fe1x: 301 83 5 848 Tel'. 3034'i5.4413 MI�IL'SxWYMXJ'ullYnv BoxYltl A YIUYMwsVrz Chectee by RRY �a�.M.�.�,rom��,.��`m„�� ..+.i��mvna�..�om --� `°'i �� 3 � `"`� � � � � �. � o � � " � � � � �,�� ° m � D � Q � � � � �p o ��- � rto✓ �,. Final Clearance Air Monitoring Report 375 Forest Rd, Vail, Colorado 81657 �I� -t,��1 Presented to: Mr. Richard Capra �`o� Rocky Mountain Abatement, Inc �.� ��/y h��, P.O. Box 621840 :�„'� 4�`� Littleton, CO 80162-1840 '�� 0 � � Project Details: DSC Project#: 2207 Conducted: Apri128, 2010 Owner: Forest Road Development c/o Triumph Development Performed& Prepared by: Mr. Steve Shurtliff DS Consulting, Inc. PO Box 6864 Avon, CO 81620 (303) 378-1544 �,__..� � � � � � � D QI�R 3 � �Q10 TpWN 4►� VAIL � +�t�r�st��t�� r �. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DS Consulting, Inc. (DSC) conducted a final visual inspection, performed aggressive clearance air monitoring, and analyzed clearance air-quality samples via Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) for three (3) separate asbestos abatements project within the residential home located at 375 Forest Rd, Vail, Colorado on April 28, 2010. Services were provided at the request of Mr. Richard Capra with Rocky Mountain Abatement, Inc. in support of asbestos abatement activities being conducted to remove asbestos-containing vinyl flooring from three (3) full containments within the residence. One (1) full containment encompassed two (2) bathrooms on the lower level, one (1) full containment encompassed the master bathroom on the main level and one (1) full containment encompassed the bathroom on the upper level. Monitoring locations and frequencies were determined by the DSC-authorized representative Mr. Steve Shurtliff, EPA accreditation No. 15413. PCM analysis was also performed by Mr. Shurtliff (see Appendix B for certification). DSC's scope of work for this project included performing a final visual inspection and collection and analysis of aggressive final air quality samples by NIOSH 582-trained personnel for determination of airborne asbestos (as total fibers) concentrations in identified areas. DSC is a participant in the Industrial Hygiene Proficiency Analytical Testing (IHPAT) program with laboratory ID IVo. 188987 and has a rating of Proficient. The three (3) abatement projects passed final visual inspection and the analytical results of all samples collected were below the clearance criteria of 0.01 fibers/cubic centimeter (f/cc) (see AppendixA forAir Sample Analysis). PROJECT INFORMATION CLIENT: Rocky Mountain Abatement, Inc. ON-SITE SUPERVISOR: Mr. Craig Greenleaf PROJECT LOCATION: 375 Forest Rd,Vail, Colorado PROJECT CONTACT: Mr. Richard Capra ' DSC REPRESENTATNE: Mr. Steve Shurtliff DATE OF SERVICES: Apri128, 2010 AIR SAMPLE ANALYSIS: See Appendix A GERTIFICATES: See Appendix B 2 . ., PROJECT INTRODUCTION DS Consulting, Inc. (DSC) conducted a final visual inspection, performed aggressive clearance air monitoring, and analyzed clearance air-quality samples via Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) for three (3) separate asbestos abatement projects within the residence located at 375 Forest Rd,Vail, Colorado on April 28, 2010. The above-referenced services were provided at the request of Mr. Richard Capra with Rocky Mountain Abatement, Inc. in support of asbestos abatement activities being conducted to remove vinyl flooring from each of the full containments. Sample locations were determined by the authorized representative; Mr. Steve Shurtliff of DSC. Mr. Shurtliff is a State of Colorado certified Air Monitoring Specialist, EPA certificate No. 15413. PCM analysis was performed by Mr. Shurtliff. SCOPE OF WORK DSC's scope of work for this project included conducting a final visual inspection, performing aggressive clearance air monitoring and analyzing clearance air-quality samples via Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) using NIOSH 582-trained personnel for the determination of airborne asbestos concentrations (as total fibers) in the containment area(s). DSC is a participant in the Industrial Hygiene Proficiency Analytical Testing [IHPAT) program with laboratory ID No. 188987 and has a rating of Proficient. The analytical results of all air clearance samples collected were below the PCM clearance criteria of 0.01 fibers/cubic centimeter(f/cc). AIR MONITORING Air-quality samples were collected utilizing a modified NIOSH 7400 Method, whereby samples were � collected on 25-millimeter (mm) mixed-cellulose, ester-membrane filters with 0.45-micron pore size and analyzed via Phase Contrast Microscopy(PCM) as per the customer's requirements. Sample Collection - PCM samples, when applicable, were collected on 25-millimeter (mm) mixed- cellulose, ester-membrane filters with 0.45-micron pore size with an effective collection area of 385 mm. All filters were pre-assembled by the manufacturer in three stages, conductive sampling cassettes with extension cowls. Air samples were collected at flow rates of approximately 12.5 liters per minute (L/m) using Thomas high-volume pumps with a minimum of 1,200 liters being collected. Flow rates were collected at the beginning and at the end of the sampling period utilizing an airflow rotameter calibrated against a primary-flow calibration instrument. Start times and stop times were recorded for all sampling periods.. A field blank and lab blank were also collected and analyzed along with the five (5) clearance samples each for the lower level and upper level containments and two (2) clearance samples for the main level containment. The upper and lower level containments contained greater than 32ft2 of vinyl flooring each, where the main level containment contained less than 32ft2 and greater than 3ftz. PCM Sample Analysis Method - PCM samples were analyzed according to a modified NIOSH 7400 Method—A Counting Rules—although samples were collected on 25-mm mixed-cellulose, ester- membrane filters with 0.45-micron pore size and analyzed via PCM. Air sample results contained in this report have been calculated with blank sample corrections. 3 , - APPENDIX A - AIR SAMPLE ANALYSIS Sample Date: Apri128, 2010 AMS/Analyst: Mr. Steve Shurtliff Client: Rocky Mountain Abatement, Inc. DSC Project#: 2207 Project Location: 375 Forest Rd,Vail, Colorado On-site supervisor:Mr. Craig Greenleaf . � . • LOWER LEVEL CONTAINMENT CL-1 Hi vol. Lower Level Containment 12.5 4:05 5:55 110 1364 6.0 100 0.002 CL-2 Hi vol. Lower Level Containment 12.5 4:05 5:55 110 1364 5.5 100 0.002 CL-3 Hi vol. Lower Level Containment 12.5 4:05 5:55 110 1364 Z.0 100 0.001 CL-4 Hi vol. Lower Level Containment 12.5 4:05 5:55 110 1364 5.5 100 0.002 CL-5 Hi vol. Lower Level Containment 12.5 4:05 5:55 110 1364 6.0 100 0.002 MAIN LEVEL CO1VTAl1VMENT CL-6 Hi vol. Main Level Containment 12.5 4:15 6:05 110 1364 4.0 100 0.001 CL-7 Hi vol. Main Level Containment 12.5 4:15 6:05 110 1364 2.5 100 0.001 UPPER LEVEL COIVTAINMENT CL-8 Hi vol. U er Level Containment 12.5 4:35 6:25 110 1364 7.0 100 0.003 CL-9 Hi vol. U er Level Containment 12.5 4:35 6:25 110 1364 5.0 100 0.002 CL-10 Hi vol. U er Level Containment 12.5 4:35 6:25 110 1364 3.5 100 0.001 CL-11 Hi vol. U er Level Containment 12.5 4:35 6:25 110 1364 3.5 100 0.001 CL-12 Hi vol. U er Level Containment 12.5 4:35 6:25 110 1364 4.0 100 0.002 BLANKS CL-lb n a Lab Blank n a n a n a n a n a 0 100 0.000 CL-fb n/a Field Blank n a n a n a n/a n a 0 100 0.000 4 P - CERTIFICATIONS � a F �y}�'y�,� M r"�:<t a .+. � ,� � � ;w � n� '' �'� ' ? ,� �'.+ �. � .; e � ;f � �r?�� p `d1 R' 1R,r �It..C*';. `i`db` �1`7r` �+�:,c'�` +»�.Cf- , �_, , ..r. .. . , �.,,, � �� STATE �F CC�LOI�ATJt7 ��` �° � t� �� 1�t�E57'US � � r`' ,��: CERTIF[CATtO?�'* �� r 4'� ,�: � �:� �� . ;� f ' �.�t�laradu lrapararraesar cri'Put+1a�Htuit�s z +�- , � �; at�d Enk�sr�,nnunt �,,;�G r �?, �� tsr Potiutian t"wstrai Di��is:osti 'Sip : �`;._ � � �'; � � , '�+��' 'ihisteriifiesUui � �:'� _'d�� „ .9 >�� Steve Shurtli#'f � � .�. Y �?, (�ertseationtirr:l,�+�13 � ,,� � � � i�;as�aret the ae ultenre�rts of l5•7�50',,t'.R.S.and Air(juality C'�rnnal � � xs� '� . Civcpnlssicui Regufsnon Nn.3.f'an B.and ix htrchy ce�tiftcd 3+�the � � � ''�i` xiate of fvlor:rclo ia the folluu�ing disriptilx� r. � �i� � � �� ; �►ir Manitoring Specialist* �� >. �� 4 5 � Iskue�M 9ip12iiD9 �� i f � f .� ��:� i�:c}rire��:'911 I:biU •". . -� �� ,. `� �°, " �� "°��d°.t� � ��,?r"`�� *nw=.mf��Hwmr»�W�,airtiep�w.....a.,y�ar�n+..ta'.:aw.ry�.n..sua,.t.s��.y.k � s"' ¢f � �ar«Yw:w«zvnediu�+E:'++�rwriAMe��r. F�, ��,� 1�",."`. ,�:' s�r, . $ � ��"� „�7'�, #T� .V tk+ 9''x*V �%M��,��,sh �� +�'"+!k ' �'-�°;i v f^ ;�`�� fr �:l.Y.�, i ta� „ 'b. ;�. .f;. ..-i. ..�G... ,�.'�. .Fa. .4\ „`n�. riw. /fi .�,:� „ -.z�.�,L'.:y � � -. , , . ..... . . ..... ._____. . :�....... ......... . . ........ ..._._....,._. ..:._..._.� ._ . �� rf i r'�d' .�"'A'�u'�"'"'�'��-�-... C'ns+ironrr�tnral ,';� �� jratat'ng dc ' `�°� , �nsuttJng S �� 6 i � : i51,',c�tf)z3a:lAieuw�.7 �� Fr�;7,.:uaf Cok:ra&i�l�v lt3?781-442"1, CEft7�I1 il S tT1A'I �tl" � ��` STE GG SNl.�RTLIFI' � � � has sacces$fu115 carople�ed � THF,fYiO�H 582 EQUCVAI��:hT Ct)k1RSE � `3ANfPL,[�VG Kc EVALt)AT1NC:AiRIZt1RV�;Ay13ESTt)S DUtiT � s � , �'�°�� s �s�,� i � ` i � toutsi:lk��e 8:_'i_xr2S,�r� t ' : .�of tnturs-� JG � �s f zen�'�aie: 08�YS�,Yl8 �i�' g � <. �rtifi�e Nrr �N10824�,1�•I�t �,�`�i J�,�✓lu�- • �°� ia?i��,r�a�i3'�.�rcNi�rc ,��a x _ '��`� '� z� +�;��'�* � �`�s��°`�?�v��'�'e��`��^�` �i��`. ��a�:��' � F�.�1x� � ��s� �+ �' ��= s a��`� �� i. ,r: ��.�:.; �� ' a - ,w' ,. _ , ,. .� "�. .. .. �.. """„�'-"� '., .. ��' .. �� "t„«. 5 AUG/18/2011/THU 10; 29 AM N�CCOG FAX No, 970-468-1208 P, 001/001 ,/� ; � . i �ate`�' ^ ! ! fVorthwest Colorado�Council of Governments To ' ��VATOR P�RMIT APPLICATXON /� � �f ' . • - 9 FroR4"�JM1� . permlt# � �"" �5 3 7urisdiction 'T8'� � U�.i.� � F�#� � -- � Totai Fee ��S'�� Date P 'd /� ro 2�I 1 Recaipt# #of pages ' Pl�Reviewed and Approved Date Yssued � � � Permit Facpiratton Date � �2. � � � � � � **All the foUowlhg must be completed by the elevator contractor**, , Inaccut'ate,ilJegible or missing information will cause a delay in the appiiqtion�proce�s. � • Please complete a separate apPli�tion per conveyance. � . • Jutisdiction Bullding Permit� Q�f0 --��'7� ' r� .�� ' `' Job add�ess ' 3$S �/�f �lID �'1[. °�t�u/�-pa �� . � Owner • ryi ra. �` ,LcRS ��r-i �� [� ' Malll�g Address 3 9r � f�va-�f'! R�'�m Ird?Z[� c�+�uY'-.,�►�o ; C � Phone� � ��3 623 7�3 3 Fax� 3'�" 3 z"Z SS � � c� Sn? � � Z : . -- ` !�1 � i �Elevatvr Con�achor ��°••v!�'� S� ��C�-;yr�� • , � o~o , . o ; Ma�ing Address 1�'G yl �117�,�GI/vCr �� '�i r.o{ ca�u sp��, �v �r�ga ,� O � � � �� Phone# �(� �•35 �� ax#� °7 ��l b 3 S 7 9�� s �' � .,,� �" Nnl � • *permits ex ire in one ear for new installations and six mnnths for altera�ia� � i New Installation Unit or Cnn��ct# � � � � �� i A1tet�tion (unit rannot be returned ta se�vice un�i!Inspected an�!approved by NYVCCOG) . , Destribe Work �i3O� i �L�j �2 . � � � � � � �-i` 1� ! . OTiCE NST L ON FEE . • I hef2by c�itify that I have re2d and e�amined this application Passenger nr freight elevator,lu\la,asq�ator,moving wdlk: ; �nd la�ow the�ame to be�ue and corred, AII prwisioqs•pf laws Up tp and includfng g5p,000 of y�luaaon=$375.00 , arid'ordinances goVeming tlUs type of work wiH be Compfied vyitn Over$50,000 of valuatlon C$375A0 plus$7.00 fnr sach . , whether spedfied:herpl�or noL The�granting of•a pemut does $1,000.00 or Fradiort d�ereof over$50,000.00 not,prestime in give authorlty to vlolate o�cancef the provisions � of any other st�q��ocal law regulating constructlAn or the Lift,Durnbwaiter or private resldence elevator; peiforma of; nstructlo . Up to and including$20,�00 of valuation=$275.00 ' • �� Over$20,000 of valuatton�$275.OD p1U5$4,00 for each $1,000.00 er haction thereaf over$20,000.00. . , , . . . . . � � . • . M97�R�1LTEqATION FEES• Fees for major alteratiohs shall'be'as set fnrth in iable 3-A qf tt�e ' .., ,. ,� ,. ... . .. ,.. . Uniform Administrat�e Code or T`able 1-A. .', `,��„�%�� _ VALUA'�ION � c�s°�v ,�' _ �� r'� �, .� � ,,.�1'� 1u'•I, � • _ � , � ' - � �,� TOTAL FEE 2��G(, - y � a 1=� , ' r 1 f� Y LCI ^ t�� °� '� � �' �� i� � ��, i ' � : �� tiS'� �'i�C',/J /T C/1�i1 u'nI fz(�' . -.� � v , �� ., S�; /�']� ,�G--.- �,r� � ..�., . ..�:, n,7t'� �'sr � .,,_G �levator plan review and field Inspectlons wlll be conducCed hy the Northw�st Colorado Council of Governments_ Plans will be fnrwarded ta'NWCCOG for revlew and�pProval. Schedule Inspeckions by contacting the NWCCOG FJevator Inspector at 970-468-0295�xt 108. . 25/OCT/2011/TUE 12: 12 PM N�CCOG FAX No, 970-468-1208 P. 001/001 COUNCII OF GOVEYNMENTS F' d � � � k " � � � i . ' ' u � .� � � � ' � 3 1 � � � i c � i a � � ' � � � To: Martin Haeberle Town of Vail,Co. Building Offidal From: Gene Morse, Elevator inspector . 970-468-0Z95 ext. 108 or elev�tor�nwccog.org . Date: 10/25f2011 Proje�t Name: Mou�tai� R,e�b�+eat BP10-0078 � ❑ C�nveyance Plan Review � Conveyance Test and Inspecction � Location: 395 Forest Rd, Vail, Co. � Permit Number: NWCCOG 11-053 Conveyance Type: Resider�al Roped Hydraulic ❑ The plans; have been reviewed and f�und to conform to all applicable ASME 17.1 and � IBC codes � The rated speed of the oorr.�eyance meets ASME A17.1 requirements, speed in up di►'echion 40 FPM, speed in down direction 40 FPM �l The Conveyance at the above location was inspected and tested on 10/24/2011 and a: 0 � TEMPORARY.Cerrtififir.ate; has been issued. � FINAL Inspection Certificate; has been issued. ❑ NO certiflcate; is being issued. O FOR CONSTRUCTION USE ONLY Comments: � � , . . Signature � � Norlhwest Cdorado CouncU of Govemmenl� • PO Box 2308 • Sih�erfhome ♦ CO ♦ 60498 970�d68-0295 • Fsx 970-468-1206 ♦ www.nvu�.cog.w.us . _` � � 11-10-2011 Inspection Request Re orting Page 1 4:21 pm Vail, CO - Citv O� Requested Inspect Date: Friday, November 11, 2011 Inspection Area: CG Site Address: 395 FOREST RD VAIL 395�405 Forest Rd A/P/D Information Activity: B10-0078 Type: B-BLD Sub Type: NDUP Status: ISSUED Const Type: 102 Occupanc : Use: IRC Insp Area: CG Owner: FOREST ROAD DEVELOPME�LLC Contractor: R.A. NELSON &ASSOCIATES, INC Phone: 970-949-5152 Description: NEW TWO-FAMILY DWELLING (INCLUDING DEMOLITION OF EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME) Requested Inspectionls) Item: 537 PLAN-FINAL C/O Requested Time: 08:00 AM Requestor: R.A. NELSON &ASSOCIATES, INC Phone: Comments: 471-2893- DARRYL Assigned To: BGIBSON Entered By: SBELLM K Action: Time Exp: �� • �i� � �t � � r�� .,� � � ` �a''`� er� . �� r,,x•� � ;��S� �� b� �'' ,,1<<t,t �� l �c,S �+ Inspection Historv � Item: 501 PW-Access/Stagin�/Erosion Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING " Approved *" 08/13/10 Inspector: nsc Action: DN DENIED Comment: cancelled 08/16/10 Inspector: mdenney Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: West unit footing No interior pads are ready at this time. 08/20/10 Inspector: mdenney Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: east unit 09/02/10 Inspector: MH/JRM Action: DN DENIED Comment: NOT READY 09/13/10 Ins�pector: MDENNEY Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL Comment: INTERIOR PADS AND GRADE BEAM FOR WEST UNIT. GARAGE SECTION 8 FOOTING AND WALL REBAR. 11/05/10 Inspector: Martin Action: APCR APPROVED/CORRECTION REQD Comment: At risk for footing until plans have been approved Item: 504 PW-Retainin_g WaII�Layoutls on west side Item: 502 PW-Rough Driveway Grade 09/28111 Inspector: Is Action: DN DENIED Comment: Not ready, Item: 20 BLDG-Foundation/Steef "Approved"" 09/07/10 Inspector: Martin Action: AP APPROVED Comment: 09/09/10 Inspector: Martin Action: AP APPROVED Comment: 09/21/10 Inspector: mdenney Action: NR NOT READY FOR INSPECTION Comment: not ready for inspection. east unit fnd wall. 09/22/10 Inspector: mdenney Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL Comment: east unit 11/17/10 Ins ector: cg Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: SI�E RETAINTNG WALLS 12/03/10 Inspector: JRM Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: APPROVED SOUTH CENTER WALL BUMP OUT Item: 21 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan "*Approved"" REPT131 Run Id: 13770 � 11-16-2011 Inspection Request Reporting Page 5 4:45 nm Vail, Cc� Citv pf Requested Inspect Date: Thursday, November 17,2011 Inspection Area: CG Site Address: 395 FOREST RD VAIL 395 8 405 Forest Rd A/P/D Information Activity: 610-0078 Type: B-BLD Sub Type: NDUP Status: ISSUED Const Type: 102 Occu_panc�y: Use: IRC Insp Area: CG Owner: FOREST ROAD DEVELOPMENT LLC Contractor: R.A. NELSON&ASSOCIATES, INC Phone: 970-949-5152 Description: NEW TWO-FAMILY DWELLING (INCLUDING DEMOLITION OF EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME) Reauested Inspection(s) Item: 530 BLDG-Temp.C/O Requested Time: 08:15 AM ' Requestor: R.A. NELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC Phone: 970-949-5152 -or- 471- ' Comments: REINSPECTION 2893 DARRYL Assigned To: JMONDRAGON Entered By: DRHOADES K Action: Time Exp: Comment: . nveway gra e denied by PW 2. Special Inpsection fianl Report to be submitted 3. Buildnig final is not approved 4. None oT the PW peermits.fianled or inspected 5. M11-0022 has no inpsection or apporval 6.Fire to approve FS system 7. Foundation steel is not signed off 8. Handrails required in 395 9. Stone to fillin for 4"gap in guard rail 10. Obtain approval from planning for new exterior lights Item: 532 PW-TEMP.C/O Requested Time: 08:00 AM Requestor: R.A. NELSON&ASSOCIATES, INC Phone: 970-949-5152 -or- 471- Comments: REINSPECTION 2893 DARRYL Assigned To: JMONDRAGON Entered By: DRHOADES K Action: Time Exp: Comment: ssues a nee o be addressed are: 1. Provide Revocabler Right of Way Permit 2. Provide drainage easement agreement 3.Backfill trenches caused by Holy Cross and Qwest 4. Clean up trash and willows. 5 Retaining wall engineered stamped drawing for boulder walls over 4 ft. �12Ov, � � tg L.��-�2— I��, � Arr-� � � � �1 �.'�.I ��-�f,,.�S �'.� � CD �„)� �.. �-- �� c9 M��. � t �A�� .AJ�inn4,�+ �� n (��o s a.4,�, / �,� � �1�'`t�-� � � o�-� 1- i�u� 's� ��J4,p �-�e � 1,� Insaection Historv � l ,� Item: 501 PW-Access/Stagin�/Erosion � � Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING " Approved"' � 08/13/10 Inspector: nsc Action: DN DENIED Comment: cancelled 08/16/10 Inspector: mdenney Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: West unit footing No interior pads are ready at this time. 08/20/10 Inspector: mdenney Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: east unit REPT131 Run Id: 13781 � - f�� ' - �-�� _� Inspection R�£�uest �e orting --_�� "^ Vail, CU - Citv O� Requested Inspect Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 Inspection Area: CG Site Address: 395 FOREST RD VAIL 395 8�405 Forest Rd A:PiD Information Hc�ivity: B10-0078 Type: B-BLD Sub Type: NDUP S;a.us Yvc'�== Consr Type: 102 Occu�panc Use: IRC fnsp r�rea uG Owner: FOREST ROAD DEVELOPME� LLC Contractor: R.A. NELSON &ASSOCIATES, INC Phone: 970-949-5152 Description: NEW TWO-FAMILY DWELLING (INCLUDING DEMOLITION OF EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOP�IE) �=----_________ Re uested Ins ec ' n s � � Ite : 533 PLAN-TEMP. C/O Requested Time: 08:00 AM Requesto � R.A. NELSON &ASSOCIATES,�� Phone: 970-949-5152 Comments: 4 i=2893�,.._.._.______________---� Assigned To: BGIBSON Entered By: JMONDRAGON K Action: Time Exp: Comment: nump eve opment is waiting for the e er o credit to arrive by mail from their bank in Maryland. They will submit the 61A by Thursday, 11/17/11. Item: 530 BLDG-Temp. C/O Requested Time: 01:00 PM Requestor: R.A. NELSON&ASSOCIATES, INC Phone: 970-949-5152 Comments: 471-2893 Assigned To: JMONDRAGON Entered By: JMONDRAGON K Action: Time Exp: Item: 532 PW-TEMP. C/O Requested Time: 11:30 AM Requestor: R.A. NELSON&ASSOCIATES, INC Phone: 970-949-5152 Comments: 471-2893 Assigned To: JMONDRAGON Entered By: JMONDRAGON K Action: Time Exp: ,�C�Q .�. �ot y�y1v a� �-�` �`�` ,b� � � �� .� � � .� � �� \�� `� � �5� �y" ��, �\ ,r�' ��` `,��h� l�y� � Inspection Historv Item: 501 PW-Access/Stagin�/Erosion Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING " Approved `" 08/13/10 Inspector: nsc Action: DN DENIED Comment: cancelled 08/16/10 Inspector: mdenney Action: PI PARTIAL !NS°�CT:�N Comment: West unit footing No interior pads are ready at this time. 08/20/10 Inspector: mdenney Action: PI PARTIAL i�vSP��-i�": Comment: east unit 09/02/10 Inspector: MH/JRM Action: DN DENlED Comment: NOT READY 09/13/10 Ins�pector: MDENNEY Action: PA PARTIAL F�PPRC�'.�� Comment: INTERIOR PADS AND GRADE BEAM FOR WEST UNfT. GARAGE SECTION 8 FOOTING AND WALL REBAR. 11/05/10 Inspector: Martin Action: APCR APPROVED,C�K��C— � , -_�� REPT131 Run Id: 13776 ***+*********************+**+*++***********************+++++*********************+++***+++** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement ***********+++**********************+*********++*+***************+************�:************* Statement Number: R120000806 Amount: $195.88 06/27/201208:57 AM Pa�rment Method:Credit Crd Tnit : WC Notatir.r.: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B10-0078 Type: NEW (SFR, P/S,DUP) PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-1301-9 Site Address: 395 FOREST RD VAIL Location: 395 & 405 Forest Rd T'otal Fees: 1GO, O1G.14 This Payment: $195.88 Total ALL Pmts: 100, 010.14 Balance: $0.00 ******************************************************************************************** ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------------- ------------------------------ ------------ BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 29.20 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 18.98 UT 11000003106000 USE TAX 4°s 147.70 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------