Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-11-05 Agenda and Supporting Documentation Town Council Evening Meeting1.Call to Order (6:00pm) 2.Proclamation (6:00pm) 2.1 Proclamation No. 07, Series of 2024, Colorado Gives Day 10 min. Read proclamation into record. Presenter(s): John Weiss, Small Champions Inc. Background: Colorado Gives Foundation and FirstBank have partnered in an effort to increase charitable giving in out community through the online giving initiative Colorado Gives Day. 3.Public Participation (6:10pm) 3.1 Public Participation (10 min.) 4.Any action as a result of Executive Session 5.Consent Agenda (6:20pm) 5.1 October 1, 2024 TC Meeting Minutes 5.2 October 15, 2024 TC Meeting Minutes 5.3 Resolution No. 50, Series of 2024, A Resolution Approving a First Amendment to Agreement Relating to Development Agreement and Town Financial Contribution between the Town of Vail, Triumph Timber Ridge, LLC and First Bank. Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING Evening Session Agenda Town Council Chambers and virtually by Zoom. Zoom meeting link: https://vail.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Yp__w9aSQSiXHBp28Kx5fg 6:00 PM, November 5, 2024 Notes: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine what time Council will consider an item. Public comment will be taken on each agenda item. Public participation offers an opportunity for citizens to express opinions or ask questions regarding town services, policies or other matters of community concern, and any items that are not on the agenda. Please attempt to keep comments to three minutes; time limits established are to provide efficiency in the conduct of the meeting and to allow equal opportunity for everyone wishing to speak. 2024-07 Colorado Gives Day 100124 TC Meeting Minutes 101524 TC Meeting Minutes 1 50, Series of 2024. Background: The additional amendment to the Tri-Party Agreement updates the agreement to incorporate the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restate Development Agreement between the Town of Vail and Triumph Timber Ridge, LLC Timber Ridge Village and the associated project changes outlined therein. 5.4 Resolution No. 51, Series of 2024, A Resolution Approving a First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement between the Town of Vail and Triumph Timber Ridge, LLC Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 51, Series of 2024. Background: Additional amendment to the First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Development which include changes to design and layout, plans, updating the project budget and updating the project unit pricing. 6.Action Items (6:20pm) 6.1 Mountain Standard Permission to Proceed (6:20pm)15 min. Approve, approve with amendments, or deny permission to proceed. Presenter(s): Greg Roy, Planning Manager Background: The owner of the Mountain Standard restaurant, located at 193 Gore Creek Dr., is requesting permission for permanent year-round use of Town property. 6.2 Vail Gymnastics HVAC Project Budget (6:35pm)15 min. Approve, approve with amendments, or deny the budget request. Presenter(s): Greg Hall, Director of Public Works and 11.5.24 Memo TRV First Amendment to Tri-Party Agreement Resolution 50 2024 - TRIPARTY AMENDMENT First Amendment to Agreement Relating To Development Agreement & Town Financial Contribution - Triumph Timber Ridge, LLC(1264146 11.5.24 Memo TRV 1st Amendment to 2nd Amended DA Resolution 51 2024 Second Amendment Triumph DA 2nd Amended Triumph DA 1st Amend-A092624 DA Exhibit 3rd Amendment G-A Unit Pricing DA Exhibit 3rd Amendment G-B Unit Pricing DA Exhibit 3rd Amendment G-C Unit Pricing DA Exhibit 3rd Amendment G-D Unit Pricing DA Exhibit 3rd Amendment G-E Unit Pricing DA Exhibit 3rd Amendment G-F Unit Pricing DA Exhibit 3rd Amendment G-G Unit Pricing DA Exhibit C Project Budget Staff Memorandum 11-05-24 Attachment A. Applicants Letter Attachment B. Application Materials Attachment C. DRB22-0234 Materials 6.1 Mountain Standard Slides 2 Transportation and Carlie Smith, Finance Director Background: The Vail Recreation District is requesting to re- appropriate and bring forward funds from the 2026 budget for a new air conditioning unit at the Vail Gymnastics Center budgeted in the Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund. The VDR is requesting to move forward $196,685.00 from the 2026 budget originally planned for the tennis court retaining walls (196,685.00) and re-appropriate $295,410.00 currently included in the 2024 budget or the golf course maintenance building fencing. If approved by Council, these changed will be reflected in the 2024 3rd budget supplemental. 6.3 Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2024, First Reading, An Ordinance Amending Section 7-3D-1(C) of the Vail Town Code to Increase the Penalties for Parking Violations in Designated Parking Zones (6:50pm) 15 min. Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2024 upon first reading. Presenter(s): Greg Hall, Director of Public Works and Transportation Background: Town Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance which would establish an additional Special Enforcement Zone and increase the penalties for violations in the designated parking zone along South Frontage Road East from Vail Road to West Vail Valley Drive. 7.Public Hearings (7:05pm) 7.1 Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024, First Reading, An Ordinance Approving a Major Amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Vail Cascade, and Specifically to Approve an Amended Development Plan for Area A, Cascade Village, to Allow for the Development of Mixed Use Development, Located at 1276 Westhaven Drive (7:05pm) 90 min. Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2024 upon first reading. Presenter(s): Greg Roy, Planning Manager Background: The applicant, PHH Design Development, is requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to 12-9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site, located at 1276 Westhaven Drive. TOV Gymnastics Air Conditioning Special Enforcement Area Memo 11-05-24 Parking Fines-O103124 Ordinance No. 15 Staff Memorandum - Cornerstone - SDD - November, 5 SDD4 Cascade-Cornerstone-O100424 Cornerstone Staff Presentation Attachment A. Vicinity Map 3 8.Adjournment 8:35pm (estimate) Attachment B. Narrative-Project Description Attachment C. Amendment Materials June 27, 2024 Update Attachment D. Part 1 Attachment D. Part 2 Attachment D. Part 3 Attachment D. Part 4 Attachment D. Part 5 Attachment E. Massing Model Attachment F. March 11, 2024 PEC Minutes Worksession Attachment G. June 10, 2024 PEC Minutes Attachment H. July 8, 2024 PEC Minutes Public Hearing Attachment I. Seter Vander Wall and Mielke representing Cascade Village Metro District May 20, 2024 Attachment J. Caplan and Ernest representing Applicant Response Letter June 24, 2024 Attachment K. Seter Vander Wall and Mielke representing Cascade Village Metro District August 8, 2024 Attachment L. Jeff Babb Vail Resorts memo to PEC August 9, 2024 Attachment M. Vail Hotel Partners Authorization June 27, 2024 Attachment N. Applicants Presentation to the PEC August 26, 2024 Part 1 Attachment N. Applicants Presentation to the PEC August 26, 2024 Part 2 Attachment N. Applicants Presentation to the PEC August 26, 2024 Part 3 Attachment N. Applicants Presentation to the PEC August 26, 2024 Part 4 Attachment O. Traffic Impact Study August 6, 2024 Attachment P. PEC24-0016 Staff Memo August 26, 2024 Attachment Q. PEC Meeting Minutes August 26, 2024 Public Input for Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024 Meeting agendas and materials can be accessed prior to meeting day on the Town of Vail website www.vail.gov. All town council meetings will be streamed live by High Five Access Media and available for public viewing as the meeting is happening. The meeting videos are also posted to High Five Access Media website the week following meeting day, www.highfivemedia.org. Please call 970-479-2136 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 48 hour notification dial 711. 4 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.1 Item Cover Page DATE:November 5, 2024 TIME:10 min. SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager ITEM TYPE:Proclamation AGENDA SECTION:Proclamation (6:00pm) SUBJECT:Proclamation No. 07, Series of 2024, Colorado Gives Day SUGGESTED ACTION:Read proclamation into record. PRESENTER(S):John Weiss, Small Champions Inc. VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT ATTACHMENTS: 2024-07 Colorado Gives Day 5 Proclamation No. 07, Series of 2024 COLORADO GIVES DAY WHEREAS, charitable giving in Eagle County, Colorado is critical to providing support that local nonprofit organizations need to make our community a desirable place to live; WHEREAS, research shows an increase in online giving both locally and nationally, and many believe it is the future of philanthropy; WHEREAS, Colorado Gives Foundation and FirstBank have partnered in an effort to increase charitable giving in our community through the online giving initiative Colorado Gives Day; WHEREAS, Colorado Gives Day in 2023 raised $69 million+ statewide in a single 24- hour period via online donations from 124,000+ donors, and over $1.46 million to Eagle County nonprofits via 4,645 individual donations at eaglecountycoloradogives.org, a website allowing donors to direct their contributions to one or more of the over 50 local Eagle County charities featured on the site, making it an ideal resource for facilitating charitable giving to our locally based nonprofit organizations; and WHEREAS, Colorado Gives Day is Tuesday, December 10th this year, and all citizens are encouraged to participate because all donations, large or small, can make a difference to nonprofits in need. NOW, THEREFORE, the Mayor and Vail Town Council do hearby proclaim that Tuesday, December 10, 2024, will be known as Colorado Gives Day in our community. Dated this 5th day of November 2024. Vail Town Council Attest: _______________________________ Travis Coggin, Mayor Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk 6 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.1 Item Cover Page DATE:November 5, 2024 SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager ITEM TYPE:Citizen Participation AGENDA SECTION:Public Participation (6:10pm) SUBJECT:Public Participation (10 min.) SUGGESTED ACTION: VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT ATTACHMENTS: 7 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.1 Item Cover Page DATE:November 5, 2024 SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager ITEM TYPE:Consent Agenda AGENDA SECTION:Consent Agenda (6:20pm) SUBJECT:October 1, 2024 TC Meeting Minutes SUGGESTED ACTION: VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT ATTACHMENTS: 100124 TC Meeting Minutes 8 Town Council Meeting Minutes of October 1, 2024. Page 1 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 1, 2024 6:00 P.M. Vail Town Council Chambers The meeting of the Vail Town Council was called to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. by Mayor Coggin. Members present: Travis Coggin, Mayor Barry Davis, Mayor Pro Tem Pete Seibert Jonathan Staufer Dave Chapin Reid Phillips Members absent: Samantha Biszantz Staff members present: Russell Forrest, Town Manager Kathleen Halloran, Deputy Town Manager Matt Mire, Town Attorney Stephanie Kauffman (Bibbens), Town Clerk 1. Call to Order 2. Any Action as the Result of Executive Session Any action as the result of Executive Session began at time stamp 0:00:29 on the High Five video. 2.1 Resolution No. 45, Series of 2024, A Resolution Approving a Settlement Agreement between the Town of Vail and the Vail Corporation Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 45, Series of 2024. Seibert made a motion to approve; Staufer seconded motion passed (6-0). 3. Public Participation Public Participation began at time stamp 0:07:10 on the High Five video. Tim McMahon, resident of Avon, asked about requiring those running for council to attend a council meeting before being eligible to run, requested a donation toward safety fencing on the green bridge to support Speak Up, Reach Out, inquired about changing the deed restricted housing regulations to require repeat offenders to sell their units, and lastly reported on an incident that occurred at the Vail Transportation Center where an impaired person was creating a dangerous situation, and it took Vail Police longer than anticipated to respond. 9 Town Council Meeting Minutes of October 1, 2024. Page 2 Rick McLaughlin, Merrick McLaughlin Whitewater Design Group in Denver, explained river surf waves in other parts of the state work as intended. Ian Grask, a Vail resident, spoke in support of making the Gore Creek Promenade an entertainment district/common consumption area. 4. Consent Agenda Consent agenda began at time stamp 0:14:41 on the High Five video. 4.1 September 3, 2024 TC Meeting Minutes 4.2 September 17, 2024 TC Meeting Minutes 4.3 Resolution No. 43, Series of 2024, A Resolution Approving the Acquisition of Real Property Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 43, Series of 2024, authorizing the Town Manager, to enter into an agreement, approved by the Town Attorney, to purchase the property known as Hamlet Chalet Townhome, Unit 3, 2014 West Gore Creek Drive, Unit 3, Vail, CO 81657, in the amount not to exceed $2,000,000.00 plus closing costs. Background: The availability of housing for it employees remains an ongoing need for the Town of Vail municipal government. As the fourth largest employer in Vail, the Town of Vail too is challenged by the need for housing work force. 4.4 Contract Award to Alpine Tree Services for Spruce Beetle Mitigation Project Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with Alpine Tree Services for the Spruce Beetle Mitigation Project, in an amount not to exceed $64,000.00. Background: The purpose of this item is to request the Town Council approve a contract award for the removal of multiple spruce beetle-infested trees on Town of Vail-owned stream tract property near the Grand Hyatt. 4.5 Contract Award to Badger Inc. for Semi-Annual Maintenance of Stormwater Infrastructure Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with Badger Inc. for stormwater maintenance work, not to exceed $95,000. Background: Following an RFP period in September, Town of Vail received six proposals from stormwater maintenance firms. Of those that were qualified to do the work required (meaning they indicated in their bid that they have the necessary equipment available) Badger was the low bid at $95,000. The semi-annual maintenance of 277 gutter bins and 37 water quality vaults is to be completed in October. 10 Town Council Meeting Minutes of October 1, 2024. Page 3 4.6 Special Event Sponsorship Agreement for the Tiesto Vail Concert Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with Vail Valley Foundation for the Tiesto Vail Concert, in an amount not to exceed $125,000.00. Background: The Town of Vail and Vail Mountain have collaborated with the Vail Valley Foundation to enhance the Birds of Prey World Cup event with new elements in Vail, aimed at attracting a broader audience for early-season visitation. Phillips made a motion to remove Resolution No. 44, Series of 2024, from the consent agenda and table the discussion until the October 15, 2024 Town Council evening meeting; Davis seconded motion passed (6-0). Davis made a motion to approve the consent agenda as modified; Phillips seconded motion passed (6-0). 5. Action Items Discussion for the Amendment to Cumming Management Group began at time stamp 0:16:54 on the High Five video. 5.1 Contract Amendment to Cumming Management Group Inc for Timber Ridge Housing Project Development Oversite Presenter(s): Jason Dietz, Housing Director Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with Cumming Group for the Timber Ridge Housing Development Oversight, in an amount not to exceed: $129,838.00 Background: The purpose of this action item is to request Town Council's approval to execute an agreement with Cumming Management Group, Inc, to provide development oversite and owner's representative services with respect to design, development and construction of the Timber Ridge Housing Project. Chapin made a motion to approve; Staufer seconded motion passed (6-0). Discussion for Eagle Valley Childcare Center Funding began at time stamp 0:19:24 on the High Five video. 5.2 Eagle Valley Childcare Center Funding Presenter(s): Carlie Smith, Finance Director Approve or deny the $100,000.00 funding request from the Eagle Valley Childcare Center for the Minturn Family Enrichment Center utilizing tobacco tax collections. 11 Town Council Meeting Minutes of October 1, 2024. Page 4 Background: Please see attached memo. Chapin made a motion to approve; Davis seconded; motion passed (6-0). Discussion for Colorado Forest Restoration and Wildfire Mitigation Grand began at time stamp 0:25:18 on the High Five video. 5.3 Permission to Apply for Colorado Forest Restoration and Wildfire Mitigation Grant Presenter(s): Deputy Chief Ryan Ocepek, Vail Fire Department Approve request to apply for Colorado Forest Restoration and Wildfire Mitigation Grant. Background: VFES is proposing to apply for the Colorado Forest Restoration and Wildfire Mitigation Grant. These funds will be used to conduct fuels reduction activities on 53 acres of the Booth Creek Fuels Reduction Project. The total project cost is estimated at $185,000, the TOV would be responsible for a match of $93,000 if the grant is awarded. This match has been included in the 2025 budget request. Staufer made a motion to approve; Seibert seconded motion passed (6-0). Discussion for Ordinance No. 13, Series of 2024 began at time stamp 27:27 on the High Five video. 5.4 Ordinance No. 13, Series of 2024, First Reading, An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, Adopting by Reference the 2023 Edition of the National Electrical Code and the 2024 Editions of the International Building Code, the International Residential Code, the International Fire Code, the International Energy Conservation Code, the International Plumbing Code, the International Fuel Gas Code, the International Mechanical Code and the International Existing Building Code, with Amendments, and Setting Forth Penalties for Violations Thereof Presenter(s): Daniel Brown, Chief Building Official and Deputy Chief Ryan Ocepek, Vail Fire Department Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No.13, Series of 2024 upon first reading. Background: The purpose of this item is to provide information to the Vail Town Council regarding repealing and reenacting Title 10, Chapter 1 of the Vail Municipal Code through the adoption of the latest editions of the building and fire codes as amended and recommended by staff and the Building and Fire Code Appeals Board. Phillips made a motion to approve; Seibert seconded motion passed (6-0). 12 Town Council Meeting Minutes of October 1, 2024. Page 5 There being no further business to come before the council, Staufer moved to adjourn the meeting; Seibert seconded motion passed (7-0), meeting adjourned at 6:31pm. Respectfully Submitted, Attest: __________________________________ Travis Coggin, Mayor ______________________________ Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk 13 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.2 Item Cover Page DATE:November 5, 2024 SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager ITEM TYPE:Consent Agenda AGENDA SECTION:Consent Agenda (6:20pm) SUBJECT:October 15, 2024 TC Meeting Minutes SUGGESTED ACTION: VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT ATTACHMENTS: 101524 TC Meeting Minutes 14 Town Council Meeting Minutes of October 15, 2024. Page 1 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 15, 2024 6:00 P.M. Vail Town Council Chambers The meeting of the Vail Town Council was called to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. by Council member Chapin. Members present: Pete Seibert Jonathan Staufer Dave Chapin Reid Phillips Members virtually: Travis Coggin, Mayor Barry Davis, Mayor Pro Tem Members absent: Samantha Biszantz Staff members present: Kathleen Halloran, Deputy Town Manager Stephanie Kauffman (Bibbens), Town Clerk Staff members virtually: Russell Forrest, Town Manager Matt Mire, Town Attorney 1. Call to Order 2. Proclamation Proclamation No. 6, Series of 2024 began at time stamp 0:00:30 on the High Five video. 2.1 Proclamation No. 6, Series of 2024, High Five Media Day Presenter(s): JK Perry, High Five Media Background: October 20th is considered Community Media Day, which is an annual celebration of voices that brings awareness to the importance of free speech and accessible media for all individuals to have their voices heard. 3. Public Participation Public Participation began at time stamp 0:09:36 on the High Five video. Tim McMahon related an incident at the Vail Transportation Center regarding a missing person who got off a Greyhound bus in an agitated state, causing disruption and needing care and asked for a protocol for those type of situations. 15 Town Council Meeting Minutes of October 15, 2024. Page 2 Holly Cole, a Vail resident, thanked the council for the opportunity to live in Vail Commons, and brought to the Town Council’s attention that the town’s annual EHU compliance letter does not give an opportunity to indicate a partial retirement, which resulted in her receiving a fine. Ian Grask, a Vail resident, referenced the Gore Creek Promenade improvement project currently underway and reiterated his request that Town Council consider making the park a common consumption area. 4. Consent Agenda Consent agenda began at time stamp 0:17:48 on the High Five video. 4.1 Resolution No. 46, Series of 2024, A Resolution Approving the Operating Plan and Budget of the Vail Local Marketing District, for its Fiscal Year January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025 Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 46, Series of 2024. Background: State statute requires approval of the Vail Local Marketing District operation plan before September 30th each year, with approval of a budget resolution by October 15th. 4.2 Resolution No. 48, Series of 2024, A Resolution of the Vail Town Council Approving an Amendment to the Highway Maintenance Agreement with the Colorado Department of Transportation ("CDOT") Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 48, Series of 2024. Background: CDOT and the Town entered into a maintenance agreement for the frontage roads in 2024, and now need to amend the agreement. 4.3 Resolution No. 49, Series of 2024, A Resolution Approving a State of Colorado Subaward Agreement between the Town of Vail and the Colorado Department of Transportation to Receive Funding for an Electric Bus Workforce Training Grant Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 49, Series of 2024. Background: The Town of Vail and CDOT wish to enter an agreement for the purpose of providing funding for an electric bus workforce training grant. 4.4 Authorization to Lease Hamlet Chalet Townhome, 2014 West Gore Creek Drive, Unit 3 Authorize the Mayor to execute a lease agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with Jones Richard Caudle II and Louise Alice Herbert, to lease the property located at 2014 West Gore Creek Drive, Unit 3, Vail, CO 81657, in an amount not to exceed $14,968.00. Background: On October 1, 2024, the Town Council authorized the purchase of Hamlet Chalet Townhome, Unit 3. The seller used his right to request an accelerated closing date within the forty-five-day notification to the Town of Vail. Town staff plans to lease the Hamlet Chalet 16 Town Council Meeting Minutes of October 15, 2024. Page 3 Townhome commencing on November 1, 2024 and ending on January 2, 2025, when the Town of Vail is expected to take title. 4.5 Contract Award to RythmEFX for the Construction of Kringle Crossing Houses for Lionshead Village Holiday Activation Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with RythmEFX for the construction of Kringle Crossing houses for Lionshead Village holiday activation, in an amount not to exceed $67,165.86. Background: After the success of Kringle Crossing in 2023, the program is being expanded to include Lionshead with the construction of 4 new Kringle Crossing houses. 4.6 Contract Award to Weston Landscape Design Inc. for 2024-2025 Contracted Snow Removal Authorize the Town Manager to enter an agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with Weston Landscape Design Inc. for the 2024-2025 Contracted Snow Removal, in an amount not to exceed $103.140.00. Background: The Town requested bids from contractors to provide winter snow removal services at Donovan Park, the Vail Golf Course Clubhouse, and along various sidewalks and stairs where Town equipment cannot access. Phillips made a motion to approve the consent agenda as read; Staufer seconded motion passed (6-0). 5. Action Items Discussion for recommended final components of the winter parking season began at time stamp 0:18:20 on the High Five video. 5.1 Recommended Final Components of the Winter 2024-2025 Parking Program Listen to presentation and provide feedback. Presenter(s): Greg Hall, Public Works and Transportation Director Background: The purpose of this item is to provide recommendations for changing the parking violations fines, specifically for restricted overflow parking area from Vail Valley Drive to the Main Vail roundabout, and to ask Town Council to review the recommended adjustments for the early season transit enhancements and decide on a course of action. Staufer made a motion to approve; Seibert seconded; motion passed (6-0). Discussion for Resolution No. 44, Series of 2024 began at time stamp 0:31:37 on the High Five video. 17 Town Council Meeting Minutes of October 15, 2024. Page 4 5.2 Resolution No. 44, Series of 2024, A Resolution Accepting a Donation of Real Property Presenter(s): Kristen Bertuglia, Environmental Sustainability Director Staff recommends the Town Council return this item back to the Open Space Board of Trustees for further discussion. The memo on this topic is from the previous meeting and is provided for reference. Background: This item was tabled from the October 1, 2024 Town Council meeting. Davis made a motion to return this item back to the Open Space Board of Trustees for further discussion; Phillips seconded motion passed (6-0). Discussion for Resolution No. 47, Series of 2024 began at time stamp 0:32:39 on the High Five video. 5.3 Resolution No. 47, Series of 2024, A Resolution Renaming the Street Segment of Matterhorn Circle between Matterhorn Neighborhood and Tract A of Glen Lyon Subdivision to Blue Rose Lane Presenter(s): Greg Roy, Planning Manager Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 47, Series of 2024. Background: Town staff received a request to change the name of a portion of a street within the Town of Vail. Seibert made a motion to approve; Phillips seconded motion passed (6-0). 6. Public Hearings Discussion for Ordinance 14, Series of 2024, First Reading began at time stamp 0:35:44 on the High Five video. 6.1 Ordinance No. 14, Series of 2024, First Reading, A Major Amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, and Specifically Approving Amendments to the Development Plan for Area B, Coldstream Condominiums, Cascade Village Presenter(s): Heather Knight, Planner II Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 14, Series of 2024 upon first reading. Background: The applicant, Coldstream Ltd., represented by Sean Hanagan of High Summit Planning, is requesting a major amendment to a Special Development District, pursuant to Section 12-9-A, Special Development (SDD) District, Vail Town Code, located in Special 18 Town Council Meeting Minutes of October 15, 2024. Page 5 Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, at the property of 1476 Westhaven Drive, Lot 53, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Coggin made a motion to table first reading and continue public hearing to the November 19, 2024, meeting; Staufer seconded; motion passed (6-0). Discussion for Ordinance No. 13, Series of 2024 began at time stamp 1:23:48 on the High Five video. 6.2 Ordinance No. 13, Series of 2024, First Reading, An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, Adopting by Reference the 2023 Edition of the National Electrical Code and the 2024 Editions of the International Building Code, the International Residential Code, the International Fire Code, the International Energy Conservation Code, the International Plumbing Code, the International Fuel Gas Code, the International Mechanical Code and the International Existing Building Code, with Amendments, and Setting Forth Penalties for Violations Thereof Presenter(s): Daniel Brown, Chief Building Official and Deputy Chief Ryan Ocepek, Vail Fire Department Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No.13, Series of 2024 upon first reading. Background: The purpose of this item is to provide information to the Vail Town Council regarding repealing and reenacting Title 10, Chapter 1 of the Vail Municipal Code through the adoption of the latest editions of the building and fire codes as amended and recommended by staff and the Building and Fire Code Appeals Board. Phillips made a motion to approve with the exclusion of Sections C406.1, C40631(2), C4061(e), C4061(5), and R4016.2.5 of the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC); Staufer seconded motion passed (6-0). There being no further business to come before the council, Phillips moved to adjourn the meeting; Staufer seconded motion passed (6-0), meeting adjourned at 7:30pm. Respectfully Submitted, Attest: __________________________________ Travis Coggin, Mayor ______________________________ Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk 19 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.3 Item Cover Page DATE:November 5, 2024 SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager ITEM TYPE:Consent Agenda AGENDA SECTION:Consent Agenda (6:20pm) SUBJECT:Resolution No. 50, Series of 2024, A Resolution Approving a First Amendment to Agreement Relating to Development Agreement and Town Financial Contribution between the Town of Vail, Triumph Timber Ridge, LLC and First Bank. SUGGESTED ACTION:Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 50, Series of 2024. VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT ATTACHMENTS: 11.5.24 Memo TRV First Amendment to Tri-Party Agreement Resolution 50 2024 - TRIPARTY AMENDMENT First Amendment to Agreement Relating To Development Agreement & Town Financial Contribution - Triumph Timber Ridge, LLC(1264146 20 To:Vail Town Council From:Jason Dietz, Housing Director Russ Forrest, Town Manager Date:November 5, 2024 Subject:First Amendment to Agreement Relating to Development Agreement and Town Financial Contribution 1.Purpose On July 23, 2024, the Vail Town Council approved Resolution No. 40, Series of 2024, as presented. Resolution No. 40, Series of 2024, a resolution of Vail Town Council approving the Agreement Relating to Development Agreement and Town Financial Contribution (“Tri-Party Agreement”) facilitating the development financing of the new Timber Ridge Village. The purpose of this agenda item is to hold a public hearing on a request for approval of Resolution No. 50, Series of 2024, a resolution of the Vail Town Council approving the First Amendment to Agreement Relating to Development Agreement and Town Financial Contribution. 2.First Amendment to Agreement Relating to Development Agreement and Town Financial Contribution The additional amendment to the Tri-Party Agreement updates the agreement to incorporate the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement between the Town of Vail and Triumph Timber Ridge, LLC Timber Ridge Village and the associated project changes outlined therein. 3.Recommendation The Timber Ridge Redevelopment Committee recommends that the Vail Town Council approves Resolution No. 50, Series of 2024, as presented. 21 RESOLUTION NO. 50 Series of 2024 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND TOWN FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION BETWEEN THE TOWN OF VAIL,TRIUMPH TIMBER RIDGE, LLC AND FIRSTBANK WHEREAS, the Town of Vail, Triumph Timber Ridge, LLC and Firstbank entered into an Agreement Relating to Development Agreement and Town Financial Contribution,dated August 16, 2024 (the “Financial Agreement”); WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Financial Agreement pursuant to the terms set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "First Amendment"). NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: Section 1. The Town Council hereby approves the First Amendment in substantially the same form as attached hereto as Exhibit A, and in a form approved by the Town Attorney, and authorizes the Town Manager to execute the First Amendment on behalf of the Town. Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED,PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail held this 5th day of November 2024. _________________________ Travis Coggin,Mayor ATTEST: Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk 22 126414604.3 A-1 After recording return to: FirstBank Attn: Loan Operations 12345 West Colfax Avenue Lakewood, CO 80215 ______________________________________________________________________________ FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND TOWN FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND TOWN FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION (this “First Amendment”) is made this ____ day of _________, 2024 (the “First Amendment Effective Date”), is by and among the TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado home rule municipality (the “Town”), TRIUMPH TIMBER RIDGE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”), and FIRSTBANK, a Colorado state banking corporation (“Lender, together with Developer and Town, collectively the “Parties,” each a “Party”). RECITALS A.The Parties entered into that certain Agreement Relating to Development Agreement and Town Financial Contribution dated August 16, 2024, which was recorded in the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County (“Records”) on August 19, 2024, at Reception No. 202409496 (the “Tri-Party Agreement”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this First Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Tri-Party Agreement. B.Pursuant to Section 10 of the Tri-Party Agreement, the Developer will not agree to amend or modify the Development Agreement without the prior written consent of Lender. C.Developer has requested Lender’s written consent to amend the Development Agreement pursuant to the First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement recorded in the Records (“DA Amendment”) and Lender has agreed to provide written consent to the DA Amendment on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto agree to amend the Tri-Party Agreement as follows: 1.Modification. Recital A of the Tri-Party Agreement is amended and restated as the following: A. On or about July 26, 2024, the Town and Developer entered into the Second Amended Development agreement which was recorded in the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County (“Records”) on July 30, 2024, at Reception No. 202408467 as amended by the First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement and any other amendment consented to by Lender (“Development Agreement”), related to the redevelopment and construction of employee housing comprised of 302 residential dwelling units (each a “Unit”) in 7 23 [Signature Page to First Amendment to Agreement Relating to Development Agreement and Town Financial Contribution] individual buildings, with a minimum of 346 enclosed, surface and on-street parking spaces, and associated landscaping, lighting, driveway and walkway improvements (the “Development”) on the real property more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”). The Development Agreement amended and restated and replaced in full the Development Agreement dated June 16, 2023, and the Amended and Restated Development dated May 15, 2024, each between Developer and the Town. 2. Consent to the Amendment of Development Agreement. Lender consents to the DA Amendment. 3. Survival of Representations and Warranties. The representations and warranties by the Town in the Tri-Party Agreement are true, correct, unaffected by the execution of the DA Amendment or this First Amendment. 4. Ratification. The Tri-Party Agreement, as amended hereby, is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved in all respects, and the Developer and the Town hereby represent and warrant that no default under the Development Agreement now exists. 5. Modification. Except as amended by this First Amendment, no term or condition of the Tri- Party Agreement shall be modified and the Tri-Party Agreement shall remain in full force and effect; provided, however, if any provision of this First Amendment is in conflict with, or inconsistent with, any provision in the Tri-Party Agreement or applicable Loan Document, then the provision contained in this First Amendment shall govern and control. 6. Successors and Assigns. This First Amendment shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, the respective successors and assigns of the Parties. 7. Severability. If any portion of this First Amendment as applied to any Party or to any circumstances shall be adjudged by a court to be void or unenforceable, such portion shall be deemed severed from this First Amendment and shall in no way effect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of this First Amendment or the Tri-Party Agreement. 8. Applicable Law. This First Amendment and all other documents or agreements executed pursuant hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado and venue for actions arising hereunder shall be Eagle County. 9. Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The Parties agree that signatures transmitted by facsimile or electronically shall be binding as if they were original signatures. 10. Headings.Headings used in this First Amendment are used for reference purposes only and do not constitute substantive matter to be considered in construing the terms of this First Amendment. The Recitals to this First Amendment and all exhibits referenced herein are incorporated herein and made a part of this First Amendment. [Signature Pages Follow] 24 [Signature Page to First Amendment to Agreement Relating to Development Agreement and Town Financial Contribution] This First Amendment to the Agreement Relating to Development Agreement and Town Financial Contribution is executed on the First Amendment Effective Date. TOWN: TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO __________________________________________ Russell Forrest, Town Manager Attest: ___________________________ Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk 25 [Signature Page to First Amendment to Agreement Relating to Development Agreement and Town Financial Contribution] DEVELOPER: TRIUMPH TIMBER RIDGE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Triumph Development West, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its Manager By: ___________________________ Name: Martin Michael O’Connor II Title: Authorized Signatory STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss: COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ____________, 2024 by Martin Michael O’Connor II, as Authorized Signatory of Triumph Development West, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Manager of Triumph Timber Ridge, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission Expires: . [ S E A L ] Notary Public 26 [Signature Page to First Amendment to Agreement Relating to Development Agreement and Town Financial Contribution] LENDER: FIRSTBANK, a Colorado state banking corporation By: Name: Nick Brinkman Title: Market President STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss: COUNTY OF _________________) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _____________, 2024, by Nick Brinkman, as Market President of FirstBank, a Colorado state banking corporation. My Commission Expires . Witness my hand and official seal. [ S E A L ] Notary Public 27 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.4 Item Cover Page DATE:November 5, 2024 SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager ITEM TYPE:Consent Agenda AGENDA SECTION:Consent Agenda (6:20pm) SUBJECT:Resolution No. 51, Series of 2024, A Resolution Approving a First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement between the Town of Vail and Triumph Timber Ridge, LLC SUGGESTED ACTION:Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 51, Series of 2024. VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT ATTACHMENTS: 11.5.24 Memo TRV 1st Amendment to 2nd Amended DA Resolution 51 2024 Second Amendment Triumph DA 2nd Amended Triumph DA 1st Amend-A092624 DA Exhibit 3rd Amendment G-A Unit Pricing DA Exhibit 3rd Amendment G-B Unit Pricing DA Exhibit 3rd Amendment G-C Unit Pricing DA Exhibit 3rd Amendment G-D Unit Pricing DA Exhibit 3rd Amendment G-E Unit Pricing DA Exhibit 3rd Amendment G-F Unit Pricing DA Exhibit 3rd Amendment G-G Unit Pricing DA Exhibit C Project Budget 28 To:Vail Town Council From:Jason Dietz, Housing Director Russell Forest, Town Manager Date:November 5, 2024 Subject:First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Timber Ridge Village Development Agreement 1.Purpose On July 23, 2024, the Vail Town Council approved Resolution No. 39, Series of 2024, as presented. Resolution No. 39, Series of 2024, a resolution of Vail Town Council approving a Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement facilitating the development of the new Timber Ridge Village. The purpose of this agenda item is to hold a public hearing on a request for approval of Resolution No. 51, Series of 2024, a resolution of the Vail Town Council approving a First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated development agreement between the Town of Vail and Triumph Timber Ridge, LLC, and authorizing the Town manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the Town. 2.First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement Additional amendment to the First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement include: Section 1.a Design and Layout. Changing the overall project unit count from 294 unit to 302 units. Section 1.b. Plans. Updating the Guaranteed Maximum Price (“GMP”) and the associated Exhibit B. Updating the project budget, Exhibit C. Updating the project unit pricing, Exhibit G. 3.Recommendation The Timber Ridge Redevelopment Committee recommends the Vail Town Council approves Resolution No. 51, Series of 2024, as presented. 29 RESOLUTION NO. 51 Series of 2024 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF VAIL AND TRIUMPH TIMBER RIDGE, LLC WHEREAS, on July 26, 2024 the Town of Vail and Triumph Timber Ridge, LLC entered into the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement (the “Restated Agreement”); WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Restated Agreement pursuant to the terms set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "First Amendment"). NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: Section 1. The Town Council hereby approves the First Amendment in substantially the same form as attached hereto as Exhibit A, and in a form approved by the Town Attorney, and authorizes the Town Manager to execute the First Amendment on behalf of the Town. Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED,PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail held this 5th day of November 2024. _________________________ Travis Coggin,Mayor ATTEST: Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk 30 1 10/30/2024 C:\USERS\EASYPD~1\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF 8\@BCL@540B60DD\@BCL@540B60DD.DOCX FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (the "First Amendment") is entered into as of __________, 2024 (the "Effective Date"), by and between the Town of Vail, a Colorado home rule municipality (the "Town"), and Triumph Timber Ridge, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Developer") (each a "Party" and collectively the "Parties"). WHEREAS, on July 26, 2024, the Parties entered into the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement, which was recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder for Eagle County, Colorado, on July 30, 2024 at Reception No. 202408467 (the "Development Agreement"); WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend the Development Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1.Section 1.a of the Development Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: a.Design and Layout. The Development will consist of: 302 residential dwelling units (each a "Unit") in 7 individual buildings, with a total of 539 bedrooms; a minimum of 346 enclosed, surface and on-street parking spaces; and associated landscaping, lighting, driveway and walkway improvements. The total number of Units will be comprised of 58 studio Units, 90 one-bedroom Units, 79 two-bedroom Units, 67 three-bedroom Units, and 8 four-bedroom Units. 2.Section 1.b of the Development Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: b.Plans. The Guaranteed Maximum Price ("GMP") plans for the Development are attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Plans"). The Parties anticipate that the Plans may be revised to finalize permitting and construction documents, or in connection with any direction or approvals of the Town of Vail Design Review Board, with approval of both Parties, without the necessity of an amendment to this Agreement." 3.Exhibit C attached to the Development Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the document attached to this First Amendment as Exhibit C. 4.Exhibit G attached to the Development Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the document attached to this First Amendment as Exhibit G. 31 2 10/30/2024 C:\USERS\EASYPD~1\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF 8\@BCL@540B60DD\@BCL@540B60DD.DOCX 5.Except as provided in this First Amendment, the terms and provisions of the Development Agreement are unmodified and in full force and effect, and the Parties ratify and acknowledge the Development Agreement as amended hereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this First Amendment as of the Effective Date. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO ________________________________ Russell Forest, Town Manager ATTEST: ____________________________ Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk TRIUMPH TIMBER RIDGE, LLC By: Triumph Development West, LLC, its Manager By: _____________________________ Name: __________________________ Title: ___________________________ STATE OF ___________________) ) ss. COUNTY OF _________________) Subscribed and sworn to before me this ______ day of _________, 2024, by ____________ as ______________________ for Triumph Development West, LLC, as Manager of Triumph Timber Ridge, LLC. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. My commission expires: _______________________________ Notary Public 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 EXHIBIT 5/13/2024 REV 9/24/2024 C Development Costs - Timber Ridge Village Costs: Total Town Financial Contribution $50,969,768 includes Land Value, Town Contribution, and Transit Stop Cost Land Value $10,446,722 Land value, loan repayment, CDOT parcel purchase Town Contribution $40,523,046 Sitework and garage Transit Stop Cost -$1,908,277 (ToV non-reimbursed cost) Vertical Construction $123,874,084 Developer Obligation (does not include the sales and marketing cost) add $497,400 for Building A revisions Total Estimated Development Cost $172,935,575 Sales: Gross Sales Proceeds $190,700,860 (includes $1,176,000 of sales and marketing cost) Sales and Marketing Cost $1,176,000 Proceeds less sales costs $189,524,860 Construction Loan Repayment $125,050,084 Remainder: to be split $65,650,776 Split:Town of Vail Developer $49,061,491 $16,400,000 NOTE: Estimated Development Cost and Sales as of 9/24/24 40 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.1 Item Cover Page DATE:November 5, 2024 TIME:15 min. SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager ITEM TYPE:Action Items AGENDA SECTION:Action Items (6:20pm) SUBJECT:Mountain Standard Permission to Proceed (6:20pm) SUGGESTED ACTION:Approve, approve with amendments, or deny permission to proceed. PRESENTER(S):Greg Roy, Planning Manager VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT ATTACHMENTS: Staff Memorandum 11-05-24 Attachment A. Applicants Letter Attachment B. Application Materials Attachment C. DRB22-0234 Materials 6.1 Mountain Standard Slides 41 TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: November 5, 2024 SUBJECT: Mountain Standard Permission to Proceed I. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The owner of the Mountain Standard restaurant, located at 193 Gore Creek Dr, Matt Morgan, is requesting permission for permanent, year-round use of Town property. The applicant currently has a lease on Town right-of-way (ROW) for the summer to use the space as a patio for dining. The patio area has a covering that includes a metal frame structure. During the winter the structure is required to be taken down and the applicant is requesting permission to leave the frame of the structure up year- round. Staff recommends that Town Council Deny the applicant’s request II. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL The Mountain Standard restaurant has maintained a lease for the use of Town ROW for their summer patio in the years leading up to 2020. During that time the patio covering was a retractable awning that was brought in and out during business hours. With the Covid pandemic, the applicant pursued approval for a temporary enclosure and covering of the patio to be able to use it during the winter as the pandemic limited indoor seating. In October of 2020 the applicant received DRB approval for the winter enclosure. In June of 2022 the applicant came before the Design Review Board (DRB) again seeking approval to keep the framework and awning covering of the patio instead of removing the temporary structure and returning to the retractable awning. In the applicant’s narrative for this DRB application (Attachment C), it was noted that the structure would be removed from November 1st to April 30th each year. That DRB application was approved in September of 2022. Over the winter of 2023-2024 the structure was not removed and this prohibited planned maintenance of Gore Creek Promenade as the necessary equipment could 42 Town of Vail Page 2 not get past the frame structure to the area of work. As a result, the maintenance of the ice melt did not occur for the Promenade. The timeframe for the removal of the structure specifically coincided with the ski season as Gore Creek Promenade is a thoroughfare for those going to and from the mountain. The Promenade also hosts the ice sculptures in the winter and sees heavy pedestrian traffic for those coming to view the exhibits. Looking forward to the revitalization of the Promenade if the structure is approved to remain on a year-round basis there will need to be extra width added to the heated walkway. During the winter the walkway is the only snow melted portion of the Promenade and must accommodate all through traffic compared to the summer where the other areas of the Promenade can absorb some of the pedestrian traffic. Please see the applicant’s letter to the Town of Vail (Attachment A), application materials (Attachment B), and DRB22-0234 materials (Attachment C). III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council deny the applicant’s request. IV. ACTION REQUESTED The Community Development Department requests that the Town Council evaluate the proposal allowing the usage of Town of Vail property on a year-round basis. V. ATTACHMENTS A. Applicant’s Letter B. Application Materials C. DRB22-0234 Materials 43 I am writing on behalf of Mountain Standard regarding our existing agreement with the Town of Vail for the use of the structure on the footprint of our deck lease.Currently,this agreement allows us to erect and utilize a structure,including the canopy and roll-down sides,from May 1st through October 31st each year.At the end of this period,we are required to remove the entire structure,including the canopy and sides. We would like to propose a potential enhancement to our current arrangement,aimed at both beautifying our storefront and contributing to the vibrant Winterfest scene in the park.Specifically,we are interested in exploring the possibility of leaving the steel structure in place throughout the winter months,while removing the canopy and sides as per usual. Our vision includes several exciting ideas that could align with and enhance the Winterfest activities.Some initial concepts include: ●Hanging decommissioned ski lift chairs for festive photo opportunities. ●Sponsoring additional ice carvings to complement the existing sculptures in the park. ●Decorating the steel structure with garland,lights,and other seasonal adornments. ●Adding a “wayfinding”sign to direct visitors to the Kringle Crossing. ●Working alongside Art in Public Places and a design team to activate our storefront. We believe that by implementing these ideas,we can contribute to the popularity and enjoyment of Winterfest while supporting the Town of Vail’s vision and goals for the season.We are keen to discuss this proposal in more detail and to understand the necessary steps to amend or change our current plan in line with the Design and Review Board’s requirements. We respectfully request an opportunity to meet with the relevant parties to further explore this idea and to seek permission to move forward with the proposed modifications.We are enthusiastic about the potential partnership and look forward to your response. Thank you for considering this proposal.Please feel free to contact us in regards to any additional information. Mountain Standard Matt Morgan 44 45 46 47 48 June 6, 2022 Design Review Board ℅ Matt Gennett, AICP Director of Community Development Town of Vail Re: Covered Patios for Sweet Basil and Mountain Standard Restaurants Dear DRB Members: Thank you for the opportunity to present a revised plan for a covered patio and deck related to these two restaurants in Vail. We appreciate the Town allowing a temporary expansion of the Mountain Standard canopy during Covid 19 era. Covered and temporarily enclosed outdoor dining is important for the quality of the outdoor dining experience in Vail. The climate in Vail is extremely variable. Sitting in the sun on a clear day can be oppressive at this altitude and at the same time, the temperature can drop quickly and the windy or a storm can come upon Vail very quickly. Guests love to be able to dine outside and those spaces are hugely coveted in the summer months. Without some protection from the elements (wind, rain, and cold temperatures), the dining experience for our Vail guests can suffer from not being top notch or high quality experience. There is no way to reseat guests indoors if the weather suddenly changes. So canopies and temporary weather protection is important for a quality guest experience. At the same time, we want the aesthetics to be appropriate for Vail. The Design Guidelines of the Urban Design Guide Plan, adopted in 1980, promote the idea of having canopies as natural extensions of buildings to create pedestrian focus as evidenced with excerpt below: 1 PO Box 4777 Eagle, Colorado 81631 970.376.3318 www.mpgvail.com All temporary structures need to be Engineered to meet the adopted wind loads for the Town of Vail . 49 Below is a summary of our proposals. Sweet Basil: Sweet Basil has an outdoor dining deck located on the north side of the building on the second floor. The current canopy is a black steel frame structure covered with a black vinyl fabric as approved previously by the DRB as a temporary winter and summer enclosure (i.e., year round). The sides are a grey color with clear vinyl windows and vinyl fabric. The applicant is proposing to convert this canopy to a summer only installation subject to the following provisions: • Summer operation only. The entire canopy structure will be removed from Nov. 1 to April 30 each year. • The black metal framing and canopy will be the same as exists today. • The black vinyl canopy will be replaced with a black Sunbrella canvas fabric (the DRB previously suggested black for aesthetic reasons). • The sides will remain as currently installed (grey vinyl fabric with clear vinyl window panels), however, the sides will always be in the rolled up position except they can be down during inclement weather such as rain, wind, and cold conditions. Mountain Standard: Mountain Standard has an outdoor dining patio located on the north side of the building at grade level on what is known as the Gore Creek Promenade. There is a current lease in place that allows use of the public property for this outdoor dining use. This area has been used for outdoor dining for more than a decade. The current canopy is a black steel frame structure covered with a black vinyl fabric as approved previously by the DRB as a temporary winter and summer enclosure (i.e., year round). The sides are a grey color with clear vinyl windows and vinyl fabric. 2 Current Sweet Basil Canopy Current Mountain Standard Canopy 50 The applicant is proposing to convert this canopy to a summer only installation subject to the following provisions: • Summer operation only. The entire canopy structure will be removed from Nov. 1 to April 30 each year. • The structure is designed so that it can be removed in about three hours should the Town have an immediate reason to access the property for maintenance or an emergency repair. • The black metal framing and canopy will be modified to comply with the lease area granted by the Town (moved back 2 feet from current location). • The revised canopy will continue to have vertical posts for structural support utilizing existing or new sleeves within the patio pavers. Any new sleeves will be coordinated and approved by the Town Public Works Department. • The black vinyl canopy with be replaced with a black Sunbrella canvas fabric (the DRB previously suggested black for aesthetic reasons). • The sides will remain as currently installed (grey vinyl fabric with clear vinyl window panels), however, the sides will always be in the rolled up position except they can be down during inclement weather such as rain, wind, and cold conditions. Please let me know if you have any questions related to the proposals. Sincerely, Dominic F. Mauriello, AICP Principal 3 Area will need to be brought up to all life safety standards. This includes but not limited to: Modification to sprinkler system (permits req'd) Modification to fire alarm system (permits req'd) Extinguishers Provide that tent materials area meeting IFC 3104.2 - 3104.4, Flame propagation performance treatment, label, and certification. Update exit signage Configure and update occupancy load increase to tented area, provide new signage 51 PROPOSED COVERED PATIO - 125 SF PROPOSED COVERED PATIO - 150 SF +/ - 5 ' - 8 " +/- 26' 11" +/ - 6 ' - 2 " GORE CREEK PROMINADE R.O.W. MOUNTAIN STANDARD PATIO 8000' - 0" SWEET BASIL PATIO 8010' - 0" LEVEL 3 8020' - 0" LEVEL 4 8030' - 0" LEVEL 5 8040' - 0" GO R E C R E E K P R O M I N A D E R . O . W . MOUNTAIN STANDARD SWEET BASIL UNIT 4 PENTHOUSE EXISTING AWNING FOOTPRINT TO REMAIN PREVIOUS AWNING COLUMN LINE; MOVE (E) COLUMNS ~2FT TO COMPLY WITH PROMENADE STEBACK; ROOF LINE TO REMAIN +/- 2'-0"PROPOSED COLUMN LOCATION REVISED MOUNTAIN STANDARD FOOTPRINT 1650 Fallridge Road, Suite C-1 Vail, Colorado 81657 f.(970) 476-4901 p.(970)476-6342 NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N SB & M S C A N O P I E S Pr o j e c t N u m b e r - 2 0 8 0 1 9 3 E A S T G O R E C R E E K D R I V E A1.01 LEVEL 1 - MOUNTAIN STANDARD 31 AUG 2022 DRB 1/4" = 1'-0"1 MOUNTAIN STANDARD PATIO 1/4" = 1'-0"2 SECTION DIAGRAM DATE NO. DESCRIPTION DRB APPROVED 9/7/2022 12:00:00 AM 52 1650 Fallridge Road, Suite C-1 Vail, Colorado 81657 f.(970) 476-4901 p.(970)476-6342 NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N SB & M S C A N O P I E S Pr o j e c t N u m b e r - 2 0 8 0 1 9 3 E A S T G O R E C R E E K D R I V E A9.01 3D 31 AUG 2022 DRB DATE NO. DESCRIPTION "WITH SHADE FABRIC DEPLOYED" "WITH SHADE FABRIC CONCEALED " DRB APPROVED 9/7/2022 12:00:00 AM 53 1650 Fallridge Road, Suite C-1 Vail, Colorado 81657 f.(970) 476-4901 p.(970)476-6342 NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N SB & M S C A N O P I E S Pr o j e c t N u m b e r - 2 0 8 0 1 9 3 E A S T G O R E C R E E K D R I V E A9.02 3D 31 AUG 2022 DRB DATE NO. DESCRIPTION "JOCKEY RED" AWNING COVER BLACK METAL STEEL FRAME TO REMAIN; RELOCATE POST TO MEET PROMENADE CLEARANCES ~2FT EXISTING RAILING AND PLANTER BOXES TO REMAIN; RELOCATE TO ALIGN WITH NEW POST/COLUMN LOCATION SEMI-TRANSPARENT SHADE FABRIC; ROLL-UP/DEPLOYABLE "WITH SHADE FABRIC DEPLOYED" "WITH SHADE FABRIC CONCEALED " AWNING MATERIAL TRIVANTAGE SUNBRELLA "JOCKEY RED" SHADE FABRIC SEMI-TRANSPARENT "CHARCOAL" RE: PHYSICAL SAMPLE RE: PHYSICAL SAMPLE DRB APPROVED 9/7/2022 12:00:00 AM 54 PROPOSED COVERED PATIO - 125 SF PROPOSED COVERED PATIO - 150 SF +/ - 5 ' - 8 " +/- 26' 11" +/ - 6 ' - 2 " GORE CREEK PROMINADE R.O.W. MOUNTAIN STANDARD PATIO 8000' - 0" SWEET BASIL PATIO 8010' - 0" LEVEL 3 8020' - 0" LEVEL 4 8030' - 0" LEVEL 5 8040' - 0" GO R E C R E E K P R O M I N A D E R . O . W . MOUNTAIN STANDARD SWEET BASIL UNIT 4 PENTHOUSE EXISTING AWNING FOOTPRINT TO REMAIN PREVIOUS AWNING COLUMN LINE; MOVE (E) COLUMNS ~2FT TO COMPLY WITH PROMENADE STEBACK; ROOF LINE TO REMAIN +/- 2'-0"PROPOSED COLUMN LOCATION REVISED MOUNTAIN STANDARD FOOTPRINT 1650 Fallridge Road, Suite C-1 Vail, Colorado 81657 f.(970) 476-4901 p.(970)476-6342 NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N SB & M S C A N O P I E S Pr o j e c t N u m b e r - 2 0 8 0 1 9 3 E A S T G O R E C R E E K D R I V E A1.01 LEVEL 1 - MOUNTAIN STANDARD 31 AUG 2022 DRB 1/4" = 1'-0"1 MOUNTAIN STANDARD PATIO 1/4" = 1'-0"2 SECTION DIAGRAM DATE NO. DESCRIPTION DRB APPROVED 9/7/2022 12:00:00 AM 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.2 Item Cover Page DATE:November 5, 2024 TIME:15 min. SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager ITEM TYPE:Action Items AGENDA SECTION:Action Items (6:20pm) SUBJECT:Vail Gymnastics HVAC Project Budget (6:35pm) SUGGESTED ACTION:Approve, approve with amendments, or deny the budget request. PRESENTER(S):Greg Hall, Director of Public Works and Transportation and Carlie Smith, Finance Director VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT ATTACHMENTS: TOV Gymnastics Air Conditioning 68 69 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.3 Item Cover Page DATE:November 5, 2024 TIME:15 min. SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager ITEM TYPE:Action Items AGENDA SECTION:Action Items (6:20pm) SUBJECT:Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2024, First Reading, An Ordinance Amending Section 7-3D-1(C) of the Vail Town Code to Increase the Penalties for Parking Violations in Designated Parking Zones (6:50pm) SUGGESTED ACTION:Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2024 upon first reading. PRESENTER(S):Greg Hall, Director of Public Works and Transportation VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT ATTACHMENTS: Special Enforcement Area Memo 11-05-24 Parking Fines-O103124 70 1 TO:Vail Town Council FROM:Greg Hall, Director of Public Works, and Transportation Stephanie Kashiwa, Parking Operations Manager DATE:November 5, 2024 SUBJECT:ORDINANCE 16 SERIES OF 2024. AMENDING SECTION 7-3D-1(C) OF THE VAIL TOWN CODE TO INCREASE THE PENALTIES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS IN DESIGNATED PARKING ZONES I.SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to amend the following code section. An Amendment to Section 7-3D-1C) of the Vail Town Code II.BACKGROUND At the October 15, 2024, Town Council directed staff to prepare an Ordinance which would establish an additional Special Enforcement Zone and increase the penalties for violations in the designated parking zone. This would establish an additional zone along South Frontage Road East from Vail Road to West Vail Valley Drive. The fines for violation in the special enforcement zones would be increased per the following fine schedule. First offense:$150 $100 Second similar offense within one year:$250 $200 Subsequent similar offenses within one year:$350 $300 VI.ACTION REQUESTED Act on Ordinance 16 Series of 2024. 71 1 10/31/2024 C:\USERS\EASYPD~1\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF 8\@BCL@EC0A6EA1\@BCL@EC0A6EA1.DOCX ORDINANCE NO. 16 SERIES 2024 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 7-3D-1(C) OF THE VAIL TOWN CODE TO INCREASE THE PENALTIES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS IN DESIGNATED PARKING ZONES WHEREAS, pursuant to C.R.S. § 42-4-111 and its Home Rule Charter, the Town is empowered to regulate and restrict the stopping, standing or parking of vehicles within its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds and determines that increased penalties are necessary for parking violations in certain designated parking zones. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1.Section 7-3D-1(C) of the Vail Town Code is hereby amended as follows: 7-3D-1:PENALTIES: *** (C)There shall be two a special enforcement zones area: surrounding the Booth Lake Trailhead known as (1)the Booth Lake Trailhead Parking Zone, which shall include Mann's Ranch Road, Booth Falls Road, Booth Falls Court, and the 2800 – 3700 block of the North Frontage Road; and (2) the South Frontage Road East Parking Zone, which shall include the South Frontage Road East from Vail Road to West Vail Valley Drive and the 000- 300 block of the South Frontage Road East. Every person who is convicted of, who admits liability for, or against whom a judgment is entered for a parking violation in the Booth Lake Trailhead Parking Zone or the South Frontage Road East Parking Zone shall be fined as follows: First offense:$150 $100 Second similar offense within one year:$250 $200 Subsequent similar offenses within one year:$350 $300 Section 2.If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 72 2 10/31/2024 C:\USERS\EASYPD~1\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF 8\@BCL@EC0A6EA1\@BCL@EC0A6EA1.DOCX Section 3.The amendment of any provision of the Vail Town Code in this Ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 4.All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 5th day of November, 2024 and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance is set for the ____ day of ____________, 2024, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. _____________________________ Travis Coggin, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Stephanie Kauffmann, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this ____ day of ________________, 2024. _____________________________ Travis Coggin, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Stephanie Kauffmann, Town Clerk 73 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.1 Item Cover Page DATE:November 5, 2024 TIME:90 min. SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager ITEM TYPE:Public Hearings AGENDA SECTION:Public Hearings (7:05pm) SUBJECT:Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024, First Reading, An Ordinance Approving a Major Amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Vail Cascade, and Specifically to Approve an Amended Development Plan for Area A, Cascade Village, to Allow for the Development of Mixed Use Development, Located at 1276 Westhaven Drive (7:05pm) SUGGESTED ACTION:Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2024 upon first reading. PRESENTER(S):Greg Roy, Planning Manager VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 15 Staff Memorandum - Cornerstone - SDD - November, 5 SDD4 Cascade-Cornerstone-O100424 Cornerstone Staff Presentation Attachment A. Vicinity Map Attachment B. Narrative-Project Description Attachment C. Amendment Materials June 27, 2024 Update Attachment D. Part 1 Attachment D. Part 2 Attachment D. Part 3 Attachment D. Part 4 Attachment D. Part 5 Attachment E. Massing Model Attachment F. March 11, 2024 PEC Minutes Worksession Attachment G. June 10, 2024 PEC Minutes Attachment H. July 8, 2024 PEC Minutes Public Hearing Attachment I. Seter Vander Wall and Mielke representing Cascade Village Metro District May 20, 2024 Attachment J. Caplan and Ernest representing Applicant Response Letter June 24, 2024 Attachment K. Seter Vander Wall and Mielke representing Cascade Village Metro District August 8, 2024 74 Attachment L. Jeff Babb Vail Resorts memo to PEC August 9, 2024 Attachment M. Vail Hotel Partners Authorization June 27, 2024 Attachment N. Applicants Presentation to the PEC August 26, 2024 Part 1 Attachment N. Applicants Presentation to the PEC August 26, 2024 Part 2 Attachment N. Applicants Presentation to the PEC August 26, 2024 Part 3 Attachment N. Applicants Presentation to the PEC August 26, 2024 Part 4 Attachment O. Traffic Impact Study August 6, 2024 Attachment P. PEC24-0016 Staff Memo August 26, 2024 Attachment Q. PEC Meeting Minutes August 26, 2024 Public Input for Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024 75 TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: November 5, 2024 SUBJECT: First reading of Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024 an ordinance amending Special Development District no.4, Vail Cascade, and specifically to approve an amended development plan for the development of a mixed use development located at 1276 westhaven drive and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC24-0016) Applicant: PHH Design Development Planner: Greg Roy I. SUMMARY The applicant, PHH Design Development, is requesting a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12 -9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site, located at 1276 Westhaven Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision. The Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the proposed SDD amendment on August 26, 2024 where a recommendation for denial was forwarded to the Vail Town Council by a unanimous vote of 5-0 (Lipnick and Hagedorn absent). Please find the staff memorandum to the PEC and the minutes from the August 26 meeting attached to this report. II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The Vail Town Council shall approve, approve with m odifications, or deny Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024, upon first reading. The applicant, PHH Design Development, is requesting a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12 -9(A), Special 76 Town of Vail Page 2 Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site, located at 1276 Westhaven Drive. Currently the SDD has available density in terms of both GRFA and dwelling units. A major amendment is necessary for the approval of the development plan. The development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses and activities. The development plan may consist of, but not be limited to, the approved site plan, floor plans, building sections and elevations, vicinity plan, parking plan, preliminary open space/landscape plan, densities and permitted, conditional and accessory uses. Attached for review are: Attachment A. Vicinity Map Attachment B. Narrative/Project Description Attachment C. Revised Amendment Materials, June 27, 2024 Attachment D. Revised Plan Set, June 27, 2024 Attachment E. Massing Model Attachment F. March 11, 2023, PEC minutes (Work session) Attachment G. June 10, 2024, PEC minutes (Public Hearing) Attachment H. July 8, 2024, PEC Minutes (Public Hearing) Attachment I. Seter, Vander Wall and Mielke representing Cascade Village Metro District, May 20, 2024 Attachment J. Caplan and Ernest representing applicant response letter, June 24, 2024 Attachment K. Seter, Vander Wall and Mielke representing Cascade Village Metro District, August 8, 2024 Attachment L. Jeff Babb, Vail resorts, memo to PEC, August 9, 2024 Attachment M. Vail Hotel Partners Authorization, June 27-2024 Attachment N. Applicant’s Presentation to the PEC, August 26, 2024 Attachment O. Traffic Impact Study, August 6, 2024 Attachment P. PEC24-0016 Staff Report, August 26, 2024 Attachment Q. PEC Meeting Minutes, August 26, 2024 III. BACKGROUND Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, was adopted by Ordinance No. 4 Series of 1976. At least twenty amendments have occurred between 1977 and 2008. The subject property was a Planned Unit Development under Eagle County jurisdiction then annexed in 1975. SDD No. 4 includes the following areas: Area A Cascade Village Area B Coldstream Condominiums Area C Glen Lyon Primary/Secondary and Single Family Lots 77 Town of Vail Page 3 Area D Glen Lyon Commercial Site Area E Tract K The entire Cascade Village SDD is approximately 97.5 acres. Because the property was annexed into the Town of Vail as a Planned Unit Development under Eagle County jurisdiction and early Special Development Districts were not based on underlying zoning, there is no underlying zoning for Cascade Village. Uses and development standards for the entire property are as outlined in the adopting ordinance for Special Development District No. 4. The Cornerstone site is located south of Westhaven Drive, between the Liftside Condominiums and the Grand Hyatt Hotel Terrace Wing and conference center. The total site area is 0.6977 acres in size and slopes steeply from Westhaven Drive to the hotel terrace and Cascade Village chairlift level. The chairlift is located immediately adjacent to the site and a public pedestrian easement allows for access across the site from Westhaven Drive to the chairlift. The adjacent Waterford site (Liftside Condominiums) and the Cornerstone site are the only two development parcels within the Area A of the SDD permitted to establish separate development plans. In 1992 the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission recommended approval of the development plan for the Waterford (Liftside Condominiums) and Cornerstone buildings; the Vail Town Council subsequently approved the development plan via Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1993. The Cornerstone portion of the approval was not constructed. In 2008, a Cornerstone project was again reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission, forwarding a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council. The Town Council ultimately approved the application via Ordinance No. 5, Series of 2008 but required a number of changes. Most notably was lowering the height of the west wing from 91’ to 71’, in keeping with the maximum height in the SDD and requiring a minimum of 50% of the required EHUs to occur within the building. The development plan approval expired on June 1, 2017, following a series of extensions. In 2016, the Vail Town Council approved a major amendment to SDD No. 4 via Ordinance No. 5, Series of 2016. This major amendment was for a minor reduction in the number of accommodation units and related GRFA in the hotel. Also at this time, the parking table was re-established finding a surplus of 38 spaces. Of these spaces, 26 were allocated to the hotel for future development. This application would redirect a portion of this surplus to the commercial uses in the Cornerstone building and the development of the EHU dormitory in the CMC building. 78 Town of Vail Page 4 The Planning and Environmental Commission has held three work session on the project on March 11, 2024, June 10, 2024 and July 8, 2024 before asking for a recommendation from the PEC at the August 26, 2024 meeting where the PEC made a recommendation of denial. Minutes from these meeting are attached. Proposed Deviations from SDD No. 4 The project proposes to deviate from the following requirements of the SDD: • The SDD requires that all parking for the Cornerstone building be located on the Cornerstone parcel. The project proposes to utilize the parking garage for the 24 spaces generated by the commercial component and for two spaces generated for from one of the three EHUs located within the Cornerstone building. The two other EHUs having parking located within the Cornerstone building. • Maximum height for the Cornerstone development of 71 ft. The project proposes a maximum overall height of 97 ft. lV. REVIEW CRITERIA Criteria: The following design criteria shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluation the merits of the proposed special development district. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that the submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following standards or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. See the attached Staff Report from the August 26, 2024 PEC meeting for analysis of the criteria. 1. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. 2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. 3. Parking And Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title. 4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans. 79 Town of Vail Page 5 5. Natural And/Or geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. 6. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. 7. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation. 8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. 9. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. V. PUBLIC BENEFIT Per Vail Town Code Section 12-9A-9: “Before the Town Council approves development standards that deviate from the underlying zone district, it should be determined that such deviation provides benefits to the town that outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation. This determination is to be made based on evaluation of the proposed Special Development District’s compliance with the design criteria outlined in § 12-9A- 8 of this article.” The full list of proposed public benefits starts on page 76 of the applicant’s presentation (Attachment N). On property benefits are listed as access plaza and the lower-level plaza that provides the connection between the skier drop -off and the ski lift. Off-site improvements include the skier drop-off area, which was proposed with the 2008 major SDD amendment (a list of the public benefits proposed with the 2008 approval is listed in the background section below). The listed “2c” and “2d” benefits include the paseo directly south of the proposed building on the Grand Hyatt property and extends to the west to encompass the courtyard and entryways to the paseo from Westhaven drive and the Grand Hyatt drop- off area. These improvements have been approved by the property owner (Attachment M). To ensure that these improvements would be open to the public in perpetuity, a public access easement would need to included over the shown area of “2c” and “2d” as proposed. Public benefit also includes wayfinding, the retail included in the building, and an art program. 80 Town of Vail Page 6 The 2008 approval of the Cornerstone project, at a maximum height of 71’, included a number of offsite pedestrian and vehicular related infrastructure improvements. In addition to the proposed bus turnaround and pedestrian drop off, these included Westhaven Drive turn lanes and associated medians, a sidewalk from skier portal to Frontage Road on both side of Westhaven Drive (now partially completed) and a 10' separated walk along Frontage Road from Western PL of the Conference/Pool area to Eastern PL of the Liftside development. Other possible improvements that could be considered as a public benefit include additional Frontage Road sidewalks and implementation of the "Road Diet" improvements along the Frontage Road as identified in the Vail Mobility & Transportation Master Plan. Staff would encourage consideration of these infrastructure improvements as possible public benefit. Developer Improvement Agreement Should the Town Council approve Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024, a Developer Improvement Agreement (DIA) will be created and accommodate the ordinance on second reading. A DIA would include conditions of approval from the alternative motion in the August 26, 2024 PEC staff memo as well as the legal instrument to formalize the public benefit proposed as a part of the project. Vl. RECOMMENDED MOTION Should the Vail Town Council choose to deny Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024, upon first reading, the Planning and Environmental Commission recommends the Council pass the following motion: “The Vail Town Council denies, on first reading, Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024 an ordinance amending Special Development District No.4, Vail Cascade, and specifically to approve an amended development plan for the development of a mixed use development located at 1276 westhaven drive and setting forth details in regard thereto.” Should the Vail Town Council choose to deny Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024, the Planning and Environmental Commission recommends the Council makes the following findings: “Based upon the review of the criteria outline in Section Vlll of the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated August 26, 2024, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Vail Town Council finds: 1. That the SDD does not comply with the standards listed in subsection (A) of this section, unless the applicant can demonstrate that one or more of the standards 81 Town of Vail Page 7 is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved; 2. That the SDD is not consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the development objectives of the town; 3. That the SDD is not compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding areas; and 4. That the SDD does not promote the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. Alternative Motion Should the Vail Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024, upon first reading, the staff recommends the Council pass the following motion: “The Vail Town Council approves, on first reading, Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024 an ordinance amending Special Development District No.4, Vail Cascade, and specifically to approve an amended development plan for the development of a mixed use development located at 1276 westhaven drive and setting forth details in regard thereto.” Should the Vail Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024, the staff recommends the Council makes the following findings: “Based upon the review of the criteria outline in Section Vlll of the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated August 26, 2024, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Vail Town Council finds: 1. That the SDD does comply with the standards listed in subsection (A) of this section, unless the applicant can demonstrate that one or more of the standards is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved; 2. That the SDD is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the development objectives of the town; 3. That the SDD is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding areas; and 82 Town of Vail Page 8 4. That the SDD promotes the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. Vll. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A. Vicinity Map Attachment B. Narrative/Project Description Attachment C. Revised Amendment Materials, June 27, 2024 Attachment D. Revised Plan Set, June 27, 2024 Attachment E. Massing Model Attachment F. March 11, 2023, PEC minutes (Work session) Attachment G. June 10, 2024, PEC minutes (Public Hearing) Attachment H. July 8, 2024, PEC Minutes (Public Hearing) Attachment I. Seter, Vander Wall and Mielke representing Cascade Village Metro District, May 20, 2024 Attachment J. Caplan and Ernest representing applicant response letter, June 24, 2024 Attachment K. Seter, Vander Wall and Mielke representing Cascade Village Metro District, August 8, 2024 Attachment L. Jeff Babb, Vail resorts, memo to PEC, August 9, 2024 Attachment M. Vail Hotel Partners Authorization, June 27-2024 Attachment N. Applicant’s Presentation to the PEC, August 26, 2024 Attachment O. Traffic Impact Study, August 6, 2024 Attachment P. PEC24-0016 Staff Report, August 26, 2024 Attachment Q. PEC Meeting Minutes, August 26, 2024 Attachment R. Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024 83 1 10/31/2024 C:\USERS\EASYPD~1\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF 8\@BCL@4C0B0261\@BCL@4C0B0261.DOCX ORDINANCE NO. 15 SERIES OF 2024 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 4, VAIL CASCADE,AND SPECIFICALLY TO APPROVE AN AMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AREA A, CASCADE VILLAGE,TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED AT 1276 WESTHAVEN DRIVE WHEREAS, Section 12-9A-10 of the Vail Town Code permits major amendments to previously approved Development Plans for Special Develo pment Districts; WHEREAS, on May 7, 2024, PHH Design Development ("Applicant") filed an application for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, and specifically to amend the Development Plan for Area A, Vail Cascade (the "Application"); WHEREAS, on August 26, 2024, the Planning and Environmental Commission (the "PEC") held a properly-noticed public hearing on the Application, and recommended that the Town Council deny the Application; and WHEREAS, on November 5, 2024, the Town Council held a properly-noticed public hearing on the Application. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: Section 1.The Town Council, upon reviewing the Application and the Planning Commission recommendation, hearing the statements of Town staff and the public, and giving due consideration to the matter, finds and determines as follows: a.The Application complies with all applicable criteria set forth in the Vail Town Code; and b.The Town Council hereby approves the Major Amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, as provided in Section 2 hereof. Section 2.The Development Plan for Area A, Cascade Village, Cornerstone Site, is hereby amended as follows: a.The table of parking allowances/requirements is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: Use Dwelling Units Accommoda tion Units Square Feet EHUs Commerci al Square Feet On Site Parking Cascade Parking Structure Spaces 84 2 10/31/2024 C:\USERS\EASYPD~1\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF 8\@BCL@4C0B0261\@BCL@4C0B0261.DOCX Liftside Condos 29 48,600 2 56 Westhaven Condominiums 13 32,000 29 Millrace (Phase I, II, IV) 39 47,984 64 The Cascades 6 11,987 12 Cascade Residences 8 16,924 13 Blue Tiger Restaurant 1,600 13.3 Office/Retail 5,061 16.3 Cascade Hotel 145 53,434 111 Hotel Restaurant 3,250 27.1 Hotel Market 1,095 3.65 Hotel Retail 1,096 3.65 Hotel Spa 5,800 19.3 Hotel Salon 650 2.2 Terrace Rooms 120 58,069 105 Terrace Retail 5,856 20 Plaza Rooms 20 7,20 5 16 Plaza Retail 2,024 7 Plaza Conference 8,297 35 Fitness Club 5,886 30 Cornerstone 30 0 62,299 3 5,632 67 26 CMC Dormitory EHUs 25 beds 6 Total 125 285 338,50 2 5+ Dorm 46,248 241 441.5 Multiple Use Credit (10% of required)44 Total Required Parking in Cascade Parking Structure 397 Total Parking Spaces Provide in Cascade Parking Structure 421 Total Surplus Parking Spaces in Cascade Parking Structure 24 GRFA includes DU and AU square footage. EHUs do not count towards GRFA b.The maximum height of a structure is 97 feet. Section 3.If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 85 3 10/31/2024 C:\USERS\EASYPD~1\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF 8\@BCL@4C0B0261\@BCL@4C0B0261.DOCX Section 4.The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town and the inhabitants thereof. Section 5.The amendment of any provision of the Vail Town Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 6.All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 19th day of November, 2024, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 3rd day of December, 2024, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. ______________________________ Travis Coggin, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL this 3rd day of December, 2024. ______________________________ Travis Coggin, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk 86 PRESENTATION BY Greg Roy, AICP Planner PEC24-0016 Major Amendment to SDD #4 Cascade Village Cornerstone 87 Application History Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com •Work Session March 11, 2024 •Initial Meeting June 10, 2024 •Second Meeting July 8, 2024 •Tabled to August 12, 2024 •Tabled to August 26, 2024 •PEC Recommendation on August 26, 2024 •Town Council Meeting Nov 5, 2024 88 Vicinity Map Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 89 Site Plan Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 90 South Elevation Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 91 East Elevation Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 92 North Elevation Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 93 West Elevation Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 94 Rendering Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 95 Rendering Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 96 SDD No. 4 History Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com •Established as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) in Eagle County •Annexed 1975 •Special Development District No. 4 established in 1976 •20+ Amendments between 1977 and 2008 97 Proposed Deviations from SDD No. 4 Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com The project proposes to deviate from the following requirements of the SDD: •The SDD requires that all parking for the Cornerstone building be located on the Cornerstone parcel. The project proposes to utilize the parking garage for the 24 spaces generated by the commercial component and 6 spaces for the employee housing units. •Maximum height for the Cornerstone development of 71 ft. The project proposes a maximum overall height of 97 ft. 98 Public Benefit 2024 Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com •Snow melted bus turnaround and skier drop off. •Enhanced skier access through the site with public elevator and covered escalator •Improvement (re-development) of lift ticket sales office (skier services), public plaza areas and the provision of public bathrooms. •Public paseo connecting the development and adjacent chairlift to the hotel. •Off-site improvements and activation including skating rink/play area. •Public Art 99 Housing Plan Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com Commercial Linkage: •40 employees generated •Mitigation @ 20% = 8 employees Inclusionary Zoning: •61,469 GRFA •Mitigation @10% = 6,146.9 SF Housing Plan Proposal: Three units within Cornerstone (2,850sf) Dormitory unit within CMC (5,700sf) 100 Housing Plan Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 101 Criteria for Approval Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 1.Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. 2.Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. 3.Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title. 4.Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans. 5.Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. 102 Criteria for Approval Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 1.Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. 2.Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. 3.Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title. 4.Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans. 5.Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. 103 Criteria for Approval Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 1.Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. 104 Massing Models Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 105 Massing Models Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 106 North Elevation Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 107 Criteria for Approval Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 1.Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. 2.Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. 3.Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title. 4.Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans. 5.Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. 108 Comprehensive Plan Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com Vail Land Use Plan 1.0 General Growth/Development •1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. •1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 2.0 Skier/Tourist Concerns •2.1 The community should emphasize its role as a destination resort while accommodating day skiers. 109 Comprehensive Plan Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com Vail Land Use Plan “The primary nodes of urban development have developed at the base of the ski mountain at the Vail Village and Lionshead. With the ski access points planned at Cascade Village along with the construction of the hotel, and its attendant retail uses, a third node of urban development is being created.” 110 Criteria for Approval Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 1.Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. 2.Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. 3.Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title. 4.Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans. 5.Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. 111 Criteria for Approval Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 1.Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. 2.Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. 3.Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title. 4.Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans. 5.Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. 112 Parking Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com Parking Required: Units within proposed development: 67 Spaces (Parking – Level 2) Commercial uses on-site: 24 Spaces (Aria Garage) EHUs: 6 spaces (Aria Garage) Minimum of 31 spaces will in Aria Garage will be restriped to meet current day size standards 113 Criteria for Approval Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 6. Design features. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community; 7. Traffic. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation; 8. Landscaping. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function; and 9. Workable plan. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the Special Development District. 114 Criteria for Approval Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 6. Design features. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community; 7. Traffic. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation; 8. Landscaping. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function; and 9. Workable plan. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the Special Development District. 115 Skier Access Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 116 Skier Access Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 117 Skier Access Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 118 Criteria for Approval Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 6. Design features. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community; 7. Traffic. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation; 8. Landscaping. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function; and 9. Workable plan. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the Special Development District. 119 Landscaping Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 120 Landscaping Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 121 Landscaping Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 122 Determination of Use Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com Per the Vail Town Code, determination of permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be made by the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council as a part of the formal review of the proposed development plan. The SDD requires that the ground floor uses within Area A to be those allowed on the first floor in the Commercial Core 1 zone district. The application proposes a ski club (owners lounge) use that is only permitted in the basement or garden level. A determination as to the appropriateness of the proposed use will be necessary. 123 Determination of Use Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com 124 PEC Recommendation Town of Vail | Cornerstone | vailgov.com The Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the proposed SDD amendment on August 26, 2024 where a recommendation for denial was forwarded to the Vail Town Council by a unanimous vote of 5- 0 (Lipnick and Hagedorn absent). 125 Thank you 126 WESTHAVEN LN W E S T H A V E N D R S F R O N T A G E R D W I 70 E astb o u n dI 70 W estb o u n d I Subject Property 0 50 100 150 20025Feet C o r n e r s t o n eCornerstone 1 2 7 6 W e s t h a v e n D r i v e1276 W e s t h a v e n D r i v e This map was crea te d b y th e Town of Va il GIS Tea m. Use of this map should be for g ene ral purposes on ly.The Town o f Vail do es not warran t the accuracy o f the in fo rmation co ntained he rein.(whe re shown, parcel lin e w ork is ap pro ximate) Last Modified: February 15, 2024 127 CORNERSTONE BUILDING AT CASCADE VILLAGE SDD ADDENDUM 1. PROJECT NARRATIVE CORNERSTONE 1 May 24 INTRODUCTION Cascade Village holds immense potential as a vibrant, year-round destination. However, its current state does not fully harness this potential. Our proposal seeks to revitalize Cascade Village, transforming it into a thriving hub of activity, culture, and community, making it a focal point for locals, visitors, and passersby alike. By revitalizing this area, boasting what is the third portal to Vail Mountain, we aim to create a dynamic environment that enhances the quality of life for residents, stimulates economic growth, and fosters a sense of community. The development of new mixed-use project, like Cornerstone Building, and the redevelopment of existing structures including the Aria and the CMC Buildings, leaning on the Grand Hyatt Hotel, all under one ownership, will maximize the holistic potential of Cascade Village, offering a range of activities and services year-round. PROJECT DESCRIPTION On the edge of the overlooked portal to Vail Mountain, the Cornerstone Building emerges as a testament to harmonious integration with its natural surroundings. Its timeless mountain-style architecture blends into the landscape, exuding a sense of permanence and grace, creating a gateway to the Mountain by distributing the volume in to two bodies. The eastmost volume is only 4 stories from the Plaza level at Westhaven Drive. The westmost volume reaches a height of 71 feet from the Plaza level at the highest point, while the overall roofline intends to mimic the mountain ridgeline beyond. Comprising 32 residential units, including 2 designed as EHUs (Employee Housing Units), the building is meticulously oriented to capture the breathtaking vistas of the paseo and Vail Mountain. Each unit boasts balconies off the common areas, ideal for outdoor dining against the backdrop of the stunning scenery. Even the north-facing bedrooms feature balconies, ensuring every resident can enjoy the beauty of their surroundings. Offering approximately 4,000 square feet, the private amenities area will offer residents convenience and comfort, with storage lockers, a lounge, bathrooms, and direct access to the Paseo, thus a convenient connection to the Lift. Parking is ample, with 66 spaces meticulously allocated above the Paseo level but below the Plaza level, staying out of site from the oncoming visitors, will accommodate the requirements and residents’ needs. The project also prioritizes accessibility, with an elevator and escalators connecting the main Drop-off Plaza and the Paseo level, ensuring ease of movement for all. Additionally, thoughtful planning includes organized queuing for passenger drop-off and a dedicated lane for public transportation, enhancing overall efficiency and convenience. Furthermore, the integration of existing facilities such as the Ticketing and Patrol office, public bathrooms, and lockers within the new building structure demonstrates a commitment to seamless continuity and functionality. To enrich the community experience, along the Paseo, the Cornerstone Building will feature retail space, including a cozy coffee shop and a spacious restaurant offering panoramic views of the mountain and Gore Creek Path, inviting locals and visitors alike to indulge in culinary delights amidst breathtaking scenery. 128 CORNERSTONE BUILDING AT CASCADE VILLAGE SDD ADDENDUM 1. PROJECT NARRATIVE CORNERSTONE 2 May 24 OVERALL PROJECT GOALS Activation: The addition of retail outlets, including a coffee shop and a restaurant with mountain views, aims to create a lively atmosphere along the Paseo, threading Cascade Village with public amenities such as a skating rink, fire-pits and seating areas to encourage social interaction and community engagement. Connectivity: Enhancing pedestrian connectivity within Cascade Village, from the CMC Building to Lift 20, as well as linking the new drop-off plaza with enhanced viewing areas, down to the main Paseo though an elevator and escalators, offering elevated accessibility to all users. Art Integration: Creating opportunities for art installations, like sculptures and murals, will add character and visual interest to the area, contributing to its unique identity. Community Engagement: Collaborating with the city to program activities, create job opportunities, and address community needs, including employee housing, underscores our commitment to community involvement. Compatibility with Surrounding Properties: Thoughtful design and the use of relatable materials, plus the consideration of existing infrastructure, ensure the proposed use of Cascade Village is harmonious with its surroundings, preserving its unique character. Impact on Development Objectives: Aligning with the town's development objectives, starting with Cornerstone Building, the revitalization of Cascade Village aims to stimulate economic growth, enhance livability, and promote sustainable practices. Public Facilities and Services: Increased demand for public amenities will be accommodated to ensure the efficient provision of services, including transportation, utilities, and recreation facilities. Traffic and Safety: Traffic management strategies will be implemented in collaboration with relevant authorities to mitigate potential impacts on traffic flow and safety, ensuring the overall plan enhances convenience and safety for all. Character of the Area: The design of the Cornerstone Building respects the scale and character of Cascade Village while adding vibrancy and vitality, enriching the area's unique identity. In summary, our proposal aims to transform Cascade Village into a thriving and inclusive destination that benefits residents, visitors, and the broader community. The Cornerstone Building represents the first step towards achieving this vision, setting the stage for a vibrant community hub that celebrates the essence of our town. 129 CORNERSTONE BUILDING AT CASCADE VILLAGE SDD AMENDMENT 1 MATERIALS (JU NE 27 UPDATE) CORNERSTONE 1 June 27 PARKING NEEDS ASSESSMENT Parking demand for the new Cornerstone Building and CMC basement renovation has been calculated, where applicable, in accordance with Parking Schedule B from Chapter 10, Off Street Parking and Loading, Title 12 of the Town of Vail Code of Ordinances (§ 12-10-10). Schedule B applies to all properties outside Vail’s “Commercial Core Areas,” which includes SDD #4. TABLE 1: RELEVANT EXCERPTS FROM SCHEDULE B USE PARKING REQUIREMENT Multiple-family dwellings If a dwelling unit’s gross residential floor area is 500 square feet or less 1.5 spaces If a dwelling unit’s gross residential floor area is more than 500 square feet, but less than 2,000 square feet 2 spaces If a dwelling unit’s gross residential floor area is 2,000 square feet or more 2.5 spaces Retail stores, personal services, and repair shops 1 space per each 300 square feet of net floor area Eating and drinking establishments 1 space per 120 square feet of seating floor area In addition to the defined uses and parking needs above, EHUs required by inclusionary zoning and/or commercial linkage have parking needs/requirements. Guidance from Title 12, Chapter 24, Section 3 says, “Generally. Parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this title.” However, “At the discretion of the applicable governing body, variations to the parking standards outlined in Chapter 10 of this title may be approved during the review of an employee housing plan subject to a parking management plan.” For our calculations, we treat apartment-style EHUs like multi-family dwellings with the same parking requirements. Dormitory-style EHUs don’t have an obvious comparison to the standard dwelling-unit categories, so we provide a parking management plan with our reasoning outlined below. PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR CMC DORMITORY-STYLE EHUs We consider a need for 6 parking spots for the CMC dormitory remodel by considering the programmatic context and the physical design of the dormitory. Programmatic Context The CMC dormitory retrofit will become a place to house workers for the Grand Hyatt Hotel. These workers will be workers and students on the J-1 exchange visitor visa, which is an educational and cultural exchange program designated by the Department of State. We expect the associated parking need for this dormitory to be low because J-1 students rarely, if ever, have personal vehicles. Furthermore, J-1 staff living in this dormitory will be living at their place of employment and will have access to public transportation and the Gore Creek Path to get around Vail for other daily needs like grocery shopping and recreation. Physical Design The dormitory’s physical design incorporates a three-unit concept, where each unit’s sleeping areas are arranged around a centralized living space (see Figure 1 ). Following this logic, we think of this 5,700-square-foot dorm space as comprising three 1,900-square-foot units. If we apply parking standards to these units as if they were dwelling units per the Town Code, we would add 2 parking spots per unit. That results in 6 parking spots total for the dormitory. We find 6 parking spots for this 5,700-square-foot, 22-bed dormitory to be a reasonable parking allocation. More than 25% of staff living here could have a personal vehicle. We believe this number may overestimate the actual 130 CORNERSTONE BUILDING AT CASCADE VILLAGE SDD AMENDMENT 1 MATERIALS (JU NE 27 UPDATE) CORNERSTONE 2 June 27 parking needs considering the infrequency of staff who live here owning a car. However, having 6 associated parking spots will be helpful to account for any staff who may have a car. Figure 1 Floor Plan for CMC Dormitory 131 CORNERSTONE BUILDING AT CASCADE VILLAGE SDD AMENDMENT 1 MATERIALS (JU NE 27 UPDATE) CORNERSTONE 3 June 27 TABLE 2: SDD4 AMENDMENT PARKING NEEDS CALCULATION (Considers Cornerstone and the CMC Basement Remodel) USE CODE DEFINED USE QUANTITY SQ. FT.*MULTIPLIER /DIVISOR PARKING REQUIREMENT Small Dwelling Units 500 sq. Ft. < Dwelling Unit > 2000 sq. Ft. 26 -* 2 52 Large Dwelling Units Dwelling Unit > 2,000 4 -* 2.5 10 Cornerstone Apartment-style EHUs 500 sq. Ft. < Dwelling Unit > 2000 sq. Ft. 3 -*2 6 CORNERSTONE RESIDENTIAL SUBTOTAL - -- -68 Retail 1 (Coffee) Eating and drinking establishment -502.2 Seating (837 Total) /120 5 (4.2) Retail 2 (Clothing) Retail stores, personal services, and repair shops -2,236 / 300 8 (7.5) Retail 3 (Restaurant) Eating and drinking establishment -1,280 Seating (2560 total) /120 11 (10.7) Vail Ticketing Office Existing use -775 Replace existing use Replace existing use CMC dormitory- style EHUs N/A *See the parking management plan for an explanation of how we arrive at a requirement of 6 parking spots. 6* TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED -- - -98 This parking needs assessment discloses a need for 98 parking spaces, of which 68 are for residential/employee housing within the Cornerstone Building. The project team thinks it is optimal for these residential parking spots to be provided in the Cornerstone building itself. Therefore, 67 parking spaces will be provided in the Cornerstone building, and these spots will be dedicated to employee housing units and apartment owners. One additional spot will be allocated in the Aria parking garage for Cornerstone apartment/EHU parking. The remaining 30 parking spaces pertain to parking for the CMC dormitory and tourism-oriented commercial uses, such as the Vail ticketing office and après eating/drinking/retail establishments. The parking for this portion of the requirement will be located in the Aria Building parking garage, which already serves Cascade Village as the primary parking garage for the Grand Hyatt Hotel, all commercial uses, and access to the neighborhood, including the chairlift. The parking generated by these new uses is likely to be less than required by the Town Code’s parking standards because most customers and skiers will likely walk, ski, or take the bus to the ski lift and Cornerstone area from lodging or residences in the neighborhood. In any case, the project team provides the required parking spaces in accordance with the code. The table below demonstrates the capacity of the Aria Building to absorb the left-over 31 -space parking requirement from the Cornerstone project. 132 CORNERSTONE BUILDING AT CASCADE VILLAGE SDD AMENDMENT 1 MATERIALS (JU NE 27 UPDATE) CORNERSTONE 4 June 27 TABLE 3: ARIA BUILDING EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKING ALLOCATIONS Aria Parking Garage Capacity (from 2016 table)421 USE STATUS PARKING SPACES Grand Hyatt Hotel Existing 349.9 CMC Residences Existing 16 CMC office/retail Existing 16.3 CMC – Blue Tiger Restaurant No longer in use 13.3 Cornerstone retail Proposed 24 Cornerstone Residential Proposed 1 CMC dormitory-style EHU Proposed 6 Subtotal -413.2 10% multiple-use credit applied -- Total Required -372 (371 .88) TABLE 3.2: SUMMARY OF PARKING COMPLIANCE Required Parking Spots from this amendment 111 Parking provided in Cornerstone 67 Parking provided in Aria (see underlined items in Table 3) 31 133 CORNERSTONE BUILDING AT CASCADE VILLAGE SDD AMENDMENT 1 MATERIALS (JU NE 27 UPDATE) CORNERSTONE 5 June 27 GRFA FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS This proposed major amendment to Special Development District 4 would decrease the Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) previously approved in 2016. This is because the new Cornerstone Building adds less density to the district than the combined development proposals in 2016 (CMC redevelopment plus previous Cornerstone application). The following tables show the approved density from the previous major amendment in 2016, the proposed density from this amendment, and the breakdown of units provided in the new Cornerstone Building. TABLE 4: APPROVED GRFA FROM THE PREVIOUS MAJOR AMENDMENT (TABLE 1, 2016) BUILDING STATUS GRFA Dwelling Units Liftside Condos (formerly Waterford) Existing 48,600 29 Westhaven Condominiums Existing 32,000 13 Millrace (Phase I, II, and IV) Existing 47,984 39 The Cascades (formerly Millrace III) Existing 11,987 6 Cascade Hotel Existing 118,708*- Cascade Residences Approved, partially existing 47,151 22 Cornerstone (2016 version) Approved, non-existing 48,407 22 Approved GRFA Subtotal 354,837 131 *The GRFA from Cascade Hotel comes from accommodation units, not dwelling units. TABLE 5: PROPOSED GRFA AMENDMENT TO THE SDD#4 BUILDING STATUS GRFA Dwelling Units Liftside Condos (formerly Waterford) Existing 48,600 29 Westhaven Condominiums Existing 32,000 13 Millrace (Phase I, II, and IV) Existing 47,984 39 The Cascades (formerly Millrace III) Existing 11,987 6 Cascade Hotel Existing 120,731 - Cascade Residences Existing 16,924 8 Existing GRFA Subtotal Existing 278,226 Cornerstone Proposed 61,469 30 Total GRFA 339,695 1 25 TABLE 6: CORNERSTONE UNIT GRFA CALCULATIONS 134 CORNERSTONE BUILDING AT CASCADE VILLAGE SDD AMENDMENT 1 MATERIALS (JU NE 27 UPDATE) CORNERSTONE 6 June 27 EMPLOYEE HOUSING CALCULATIONS The provided employee housing for the new Cornerstone Building aligns with the requirements of both the inclusionary zoning and commercial linkage chapters of the Town Code. Calculations are provided below to demonstrate this compliance. APPLICABLE RULES From Chapter 23 – Commercial Linkage The employee generation rates found in Table 23-1, “Employee Generation Rates By Type Of Commercial Use”, of this section, shall be applied to each type of use in a commercial development. For any use not listed, the Administrator shall determine the applicable employee generation rate by consulting the town’s current nexus study (§ 12-23-2). The only commercial uses in Cornerstone are retail and the Vail ticketing office. Both fall into the category of “Retail store/personal service/repair shop” under the Town Code. According to Table 23 -1, this use type generates 2.4 employees per 1,000 feet of new net floor area. Each commercial development or redevelopment shall mitigate its impact on employee housing by providing EHUs for 20% of the employees generated, pursuant to Table 23-1 of this section, or the nexus study, in accordance with the requirements of this chapter (§ 12-23-2). For all new construction (i.e., development that does not affect any existing buildings or structures) and demo/rebuild projects that result in a mitigation requirement of 1.25 employees or greater, no less than one-half the mitigation of employee housing required by this chapter shall be accomplished with on site units (§ 12-23-6). From Chapter 24 - Inclusionary Zoning: Every residential development and redevelopment shall be required to mitigate its direct and secondary impacts on the town by providing employee housing at a mitigation rate of 10% of the total new GRFA (§ 12-24-2). For all new construction (i.e., development that does not affect any existing buildings or structures) and demo/rebuild projects that result in a mitigation requirement of 438 square feet or greater, no less than one-half the mitigation of employee housing required by this chapter shall be accomplished with on site units (§ 12-24-6). COMMERCIAL LINKAGE CALCULATION The math below outlines the commercial linkage EHU requirement for all of Cornerstone’s commercial uses. TABLE 7: COMMERCIAL LINKAGE CALCULATION COMMERCIAL LINKAGE USE SF PROVIDED USE AS DEFINED BY CODE COMMERCIAL LINKAGE RULE EMPLOYEES GENERATED Retail 1 (Coffee) 837 Eating and drinking establishment 10.2 employees per 1,000 feet of new net floor area 8.5 Retail 2 (Clothing) 2,235 Retail store/personal service/repair shop 2.4 employees per 1,000 feet of new net floor area 5.4 Retail 3 (Restaurant) 2,560 Eating and drinking establishment 10.2 employees per 1,000 feet of new net floor area 26.1 Ticket Office 775 Existing use Replace existing space and use 0 Employees Generated Subtotal -- 40.0 20% Mitigation Requirement Applied -- 8 50% On-Site Mitigation Requirement Applied - 4 135 CORNERSTONE BUILDING AT CASCADE VILLAGE SDD AMENDMENT 1 MATERIALS (JU NE 27 UPDATE) CORNERSTONE 7 June 27 The 50% on-site mitigation requirement of 4 employees must be mitigated through on-site EHUs. The remaining 4 employees may be mitigated through one or any combination of the following: on-site EHUs, off-site EHUs, payment of fees in lieu, or conveyance of vacant property off-site. INCLUSIONARY ZONING CALCULATION The math below outlines the inclusionary zoning EHU requirement for Cornerstone’s residential development. Cornerstone GRFA 61 ,469 10% mitigation requirement applied 6,146.9 50% On-Site mitigation requirement applied 3,073.45 The 50% on-site mitigation requirement of 3,073.45 square feet must be mitigated through on-site EHUs. The remaining 3,073.45 square feet may be mitigated through one or any combination of the following: on -site EHUs, off-site EHUs, payment of fees in lieu, or conveyance of vacant property off-site. TOTAL REQUIREMENT AND PROVISION TABLE 8: PROVIDED EHUS USE SQ. FT.UNIT QUANTITY BEDS Cornerstone Apartment- style EHU (2-bedroom) 2,850 3 6.75 CMC Dormitory-style EHU 5,700 2 25 On-site EHU Total 8,550 5 31 .75 TABLE 9: REQUIRED EHUS REQUIREMENT SQ. FT. USED BEDS PROVIDED MITIGATION STRATEGY NOTES Commercial Linkage 8 beds (employees) 2,072.7*9 CMC Dormitory- style EHU Requirement is met with 8 beds Inclusionary Zoning 6146.9 square feet 3,627.3*16 CMC Dormitory- style EHU Requirement is met with 6,477.3 sq. ft. provided (330.4 sq. ft. in excess) 2,850 6.75 Cornerstone Apartment-style EHU (2-bedroom) * 228 sq. ft. per employee based on dividing the total dormitory floor area by the number of beds (5,700/22) 136 CORNERSTONE BUILDING AT CASCADE VILLAGE SDD AMENDMENT 1 MATERIALS (JU NE 27 UPDATE) CORNERSTONE 8 June 27 SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CALCULATIONS The last major amendment to SDD #4 was codified by Ordinance 5 of 2016. The development statistics from that ordinance accounted for two development proposals that never happened. As a result, the 2016 ordinance has greater density allowances than what exists on site. This next section goes over the new proposed amendments to SDD #4 that would update the site development standards from Ordinance 5 of 2016. These proposed amendments would alter the SDD to accommodate for the development of the new Cornerstone Building proposal, while also adjusting the site development standards to match how the district has changed since 2016. LAND USE APPLICANT COMMENT: The schedule of permitted, conditional, and accessory land uses will not change in this amendment. The previously approved ordinance defining SDD #4 included a lengthy list of permitted uses for Area A of Cascade Village. Retail and multi-family dwellings are both permitted uses. None of the proposed uses in Cornerstone are conditional or accessory use types. PROPOSED LAND USE STANDARD: No amendment, the previous language regarding permitted, conditional, and accessory uses will not change. DENSITY APPLICANT COMMENT: The overall residential density of SDD #4 if this amendment with the Cornerstone building proposal is passed, will slightly decrease from the 2016 approval. This is because the new Cornerstone Building proposes 30 dwelling units while SDD #4 is currently short 36 units from the approved 2016 ordinance. Similarly, the new Cornerstone Building proposes 61, 469 GRFA while SDD #4 is short 78,634 GRFA from the approved 2016 ordinance. Therefore, the proposed amendment will represent a decrease in the overall district density from what is currently allowed (See Tables 4 and 5). EXISTING DENSITY STANDARD: “In Area A, a total of two hundred eighty-eight (285) accommodation of transient dwelling units and a maximum of one hundred thirty-one (131) dwelling units for a total density of two hundred seventy-five (273.5) dwelling units.” “Area A, Cascade Village – The gross residential floor area (GRFA) for all buildings shall not exceed 354,837 square feet.” PROPOSED DENSITY STANDARD: “In Area A, a total of two hundred eighty-eight (285) accommodation of transient dwelling units and a maximum of one hundred thirty-one (125) dwelling units for a total density of two hundred seventy-three (267.5) dwelling units.” “Area A, Cascade Village – The gross residential floor area (GRFA) for all buildings shall not exceed 337, 672 square feet.” 137 CORNERSTONE BUILDING AT CASCADE VILLAGE SDD AMENDMENT 1 MATERIALS (JU NE 27 UPDATE) CORNERSTONE 9 June 27 SETBACKS APPLICANT COMMENT: The new Cornerstone Building has no implications requiring us to change the existing setback development standards. The development plan for Cornerstone does not violate the minimum setback of 20 feet on the periphery of Area A and will comply with setback standards by indicating its setbacks in the development plan. PROPOSED LAND USE STANDARD: No amendment, the previous language regarding setbacks will not change. HEIGHT APPLICANT COMMENT: The amendment will propose an adjustment to the height development standard, allowing for a taller building than previously approved at the Cornerstone site. Even though the amendment increases the height of Cornerstone as defined by code, the actual perceived height of the largest part of the building from street level is only 71 feet. EXISTING HEIGHT STANDARD: “Cornerstone Building: Maximum height of 71 feet” PROPOSED HEIGHT STANDARD: “Cornerstone Building: Maximum height of 97 feet” SITE COVERAGE APPLICANT COMMENT: The existing standard for site coverage allows whatever site coverage is approved in the development plan. The site coverage of the Cornerstone Building footprint equals 79.5% of the site. (24,152 sf / 30,393 sf). LANDSCAPING APPLICANT COMMENT: The existing standard for landscaping allows whatever landscaping is approved in the development plan. The landscaping coverage of the Cornerstone development is 20.5%, which includes 1,745 square feet of planted area and the rest is pavers, sidewalks, and circulation. PARKING AND LOADING APPLICANT COMMENT: The new Cornerstone Building has no implications requiring us to change the existing parking and loading requirements. The development plan for Cornerstone will comply with Chapter 12 -10 of Vail Town Code, and 100% of parking will be located within a parking structure. 138 CORNERSTONE BUILDING AT CASCADE VILLAGE SDD AMENDMENT 1 MATERIALS (JU NE 27 UPDATE) CORNERSTONE 10 June 27 PROPOSED PARKING AND LOADING STANDARD: No amendment, the previous language regarding parking and loading will not change. TABLE 10 : APPROVED CONDITIONS TABLE USE DUs AUs GRFA EHUs COMM SQ. FT. ON-SITE PARKING ARIA GARAGE PARKING Liftside Condos (Formerly Waterford) 29 - 48,600 2 - 56 - Westhaven Condominiums 13 - 32,000 - - 29 - Millrace (Phase I, II, IV) 39 - 47,984 - - 64 - The Cascades (Formerly Millrace III) 6 - 11,987 - - 12 - CMC – Cascade Residences 22 - 47,151 - - 13 16 Blue Tiger Restaurant (empty) - - - - 1,600 - 13.3 CMC – Offices - - - - 5,061 -16.3 Cascade Hotel – Rooms - 285 118,708 - - -232 Cascade Hotel – Commercial Uses - - - - 19,771 - 82.9 Cascade Hotel – Conference Uses - - - - 8,297 - 35 Fitness Club (old Aria Club) - - - - 5,886 - 30 Cornerstone 22 - 48,407 4 623 56 - Total 131 285 354,837 6 41,238 230 425.5 Multiple Use Credit Applied (10% of required) -42.5 Parking Required 383 Total Parking Spaces Provided in Aria 421 Parking Surplus 38 Cascade Hotel has a separate permit to add 77 parking spaces to the upper level of the Cascade Club (Aria) building, by a minor amendment granted in 2015, which is not included in this accounting of parking spaces. 26 of the current surplus parking spaces are reserved for use by the hotel to accommodate future changes in use or expansions requiring parking. TABLE 1 1 : FINAL AMENDED DISTRICT STATS USE DUs AUs GRFA EHUs EHU SQ. FT. COMM SQ. FT. ON-SITE PARKING ARIA GARAGE PARKING Liftside Condos (Formerly Waterford) 29 - 48,600 2 Unknown -56 - 139 CORNERSTONE BUILDING AT CASCADE VILLAGE SDD AMENDMENT 1 MATERIALS (JU NE 27 UPDATE) CORNERSTONE 11 June 27 Westhaven Condominiums 13 - 32,000 - - - 29 - Millrace (Phase I, II, IV) 39 - 47,984 - - - 64 - The Cascades (Formerly Millrace III) 6 - 11,987 - - - 12 - CMC – Cascade Residences 8 - 16,924 - - - - 16 Blue Tiger Restaurant (empty) - - - - - - - - CMC – Offices - - - - - 5,061 - 16.3 CMC – Dormitory EHUs - - - 1 5,700 - - 6 Cascade Hotel – Rooms - 285 118,708 - - - - 232 Cascade Hotel – Commercial Uses - - - - - 19,771 - 82.9 Cascade Hotel – Conference Uses - - - - - 8,297 - 35 Fitness Club (No longer in use) - - - - - - - - Cornerstone 30 - 61,469 3 2,850 5,632 67 31 Total 125 285 337, 672 5 7,760 + 37,304 227 420 (419.2) Multiple Use Credit Applied (10% of required) -42 Parking Required 378 Total Parking Spaces Provided in Aria 421 Parking Surplus 43 Cascade Hotel has a separate permit to add 77 parking spaces to the upper level of the Cascade Club (Aria) building, by a minor amendment granted in 2015, which is not included in this accounting of parking spaces. 26 of the current surplus parking spaces are reserved for use by the hotel to accommodate future changes in use or expansions requiring parking. 140 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Issue Date: Project: Original Issuance: PRO G RESS PRINTS NOT FO R CO NSTRUCT IO N 4/12/2024 11:04:09 AM 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 1 1 :0 4 :0 9 A M CASCADE VILLAGE | CORNERSTONE 04.10.2024 1276 WESTHAVEN DR. VAIL, CO 81657 24900.00 PEC SUBMITTAL 01 OF: 01 COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 141 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Consultant Revision Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Project Team PRO G RESS PRINTS NO T FO R CO NSTRUCTIO N Issuance Date VICINITY MAP Stamp Sheet Index 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 3 6 : 0 3 A M 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 1 1 :3 6 :0 3 A M 24900.00 G-01 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 SHEET INDEX & PROJECT INFO OWNER PARKS HOSPITALITY HOLDINGS ALONSO RUIZ de VELASCO ARV@PHH.COM.MX ARCHITECT DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS 2901 BLAKE STREET, SUITE 100 DENVER, CO 80205 303.861.8555 SCOTT NEVIN SCOTT.NEVIN@DAVISPARTNERSHIP.COM PLANNING SE GROUP 323 W. MAIN ST. FRISCO, CO 80443 970-668-3398 GABBY VOELLER GVOELLER@SEGROUP.COM CIVIL MARTIN / MARTIN 77 METCALF ROAD, SUITE 301 AVON, CO 81620 970.926.6007 MARK LUNA MLUNA@MARTINMARTIN.COM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS 2901 BLAKE STREET, SUITE 100 DENVER, CO 80205 303.861.8555 SCOTT NEVIN SCOTT.NEVIN@DAVISPARTNERSHIP.COM 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. WESTHAVEN DR GRAND HYATT C AS C A D E C H A I R L I F T BALLROOM ARIA CMC CORNERSTONE LIFTSIDE GORE CREEK W E ST HA V E N CI R S FRONTAGE RD W I-70 E I-70 W 0 200 EXISTING BUILDINGS CREEK CORNERSTONE SITE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS COVER - PEC SUBMITTAL SHEET INDEX & PROJECT INFO PROJECT DATA EXISTING SITE CONTEXT CIVIL SITE PLAN GRADING, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN ARCHITECTURE OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL P2 - PASEO OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL P1 - PARKING OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 - PLAZA OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 4 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 5 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 6 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - ROOF LEVEL OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - GRFA CALCULATIONS ELEVATIONS ELEVATIONS PROJECT RENDERINGS PROJECT RENDERINGS MATERIAL BOARD MATERIAL BOARD BUILDING SECTIONS BUILDING SECTIONS SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS OVERALL PLAN - SITE COVERAGE LANDSCAPE SITE MATERIALS PLAN - LEVEL 1 - PLAZA SITE MATERIALS PLAN - LEVEL P2 - PASEO SITE ENLARGED PLAN - DROP-OFF LANDSCAPE PLAN - LEVEL 1 - PLAZA LANDSCAPE PLAN - LEVEL P2 - PASEO LANDSCAPE RENDERINGS LIGHTING LIGHTING PLAN - LEVEL P2 - PASEO LIGHTING PLAN - LEVEL 1 - PLAZA LIGHTING CUTSHEETS G-00 G-01 G-02 G-03 C1 - C2 C-1 C-2 A-02 - A-22 A-02 A-03 A-04 A-05 A-06 A-07 A-08 A-09 A-10 A-11 A-12 A-13 A-14 A-15 A-16 A-17 A-18 A-19 A-20 A-21 A-22 L-101 - L-900 L-101 L-102 L-103 L-301 L-302 L-900 AL-03 - AL-16 AL-03 AL-05 AL-16 WESTHAVEN DR GRAND HYATT CAS CA D E C H A I R L I F T BALLROOM ARIA CMC CORNERSTONE LIFTSIDE GORE CREEK WE STH A VE N C I R S FRONTAGE RD W I-70 E I-70 W 0 200 EXISTING BUILDINGS CREEK CORNERSTONE SITE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 142 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PRO G RESS PRIN TS NO T FO R CO NS TRU CTIO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 1 1 :0 3 :0 7 A M 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 0 3 : 0 7 A M 24900.00 G-02 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 PROJECT DATA 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. Eating / Drinking 10.2 / 1000 Retail 2.4 / 1000 GRFA 10% LEVEL UNIT A UNIT B EHU UNIT C UNIT D UNIT E UNIT F UNIT G UNIT H UNIT M UNIT N UNIT P COUNT GRFA GROSS BUILDING AREA 6 00000110 00023,9985,020 5 00001111 00049,09710,365 4 00001111 011613,09515,095 East Restaurant 2560 5.22 * Eating / Drinking (10.2 / 1000 sf) 3 00001111 011613,09515,095 32 West Coffee Shop 840 1.71 * Eating / Drinking (10.2 / 1000 sf) 2 00001111 011 6 13,095 15,095 66 Ticket Office 775 0.00 * Replaces Existing Space & Use 1 12210000 101811,97917,460 67 6.94 Employees to be Housed PARKING 0 22,950 3.47 Employees min. to be Housed on-site PASEO 0 18,780 # OF UNITS 1 2 2 1 4 5 5 4 1 3 4 32 SF / UNIT: 1,910 1,200 1,030 1,965 1,999 1,999 1,999 3,100 1,645 1,999 1,999 2,011 TOTAL SF: 1,910 2,400 2,060 1,965 7,996 9,995 9,995 12,400 1,645 5,997 7,996 64,359 62,299 119,860 % OF UNITS 3% 6% 6% 3% 13% 16% 16% 13% 3% 9% 13%GRFA 62,299 6229.90 EHU SF required PARKING REQ 2 4 4 2 8 10 10 10 2 6 8 66 3114.95 EHU SF min. to be provided on-site Total EHU SF Required SF SF #Commercial Linkage 6.94 1500.0 3,700 1,030 2 GRFA 62,299 6229.9 2,350 7729.9 EHU SF required 6,420 7760.0 EHU SF provided 1,980 2,060 2 14,450 5,700 7,760 2 *20% of Total 50% Provided on- site min. CASCADE VILLAGE | CORNERSTONE 04.29.2024 PARKING UNITS UNDER 2,000 SF REQUIRE 2 SPACES EACH UNITS OVER 2,000 SF REQUIRE 2.5 SPACES EACH UNITS PROVIDED PARKING REQUIRED PARKING PROVIDED Total Units Avg. Unit Size VAIL - TICKETING/PATROL 775 RETAIL PLAZA PASEO LEVEL PROGRAM OUTDOOR PUBLIC AMENITY EHU PROVIDED RETAIL 3,500 UPPER PLAZA SF 1,450 14,746 PUBLIC AMENITY PASEO CORRIDOR 6,930 OWNER LOUNGE 5,680 PASEO CONNECTION BOH / STORAGE / MISC.IN-BUILDING EHU CIRCULATION 3,890 EFFICENCY 0.824 8,650 MECHANICAL 1,955 TOTAL (EXCL. PARKING) 96,910 OWNER STORAGE 1,530 GROSS STAIR / ELEVATOR GROSS BUILDING AREA 119,860 GROSS 18,780 PARKING LEVEL 22,950 PASEO LEVEL 18,780 *Fractional remainder of Commercial Linkage fees to be paid in lieu of SF as allowable per Town of Vail Ordinance 12- 23-6. CMC BUILDING EHU ON-SITE EHU TOTAL UNIT C Commercial Linkage Employees GeneratedSF Provided Inclusionary Zoning INT. AMENITY 2,225 SF BY PROGRAM SF GRFA (incl. EHU) 64,359 SDD AMENDMENT 1 MATERIALS PARKING NEEDS ASSESSMENT Parking demand for the new Cornerstone Building and CMC basement renovation has been calculated, where applicable, in accordance with Parking Schedule B from Chapter 10, Off Street Parking and Loading, Title 12 of the Town of Vail Code of Ordinances (§ 12-10-10). Schedule B applies to all properties outside Vail’s “Commercial Core Areas,” which includes SDD #4. TABLE 1: RELEVANT EXCERPTS FROM SCHEDULE B USE PARKING REQUIREMENT Multiple-family dwellings If a dwelling unit’s gross residential floor area is 500 square feet or less 1.5 spaces If a dwelling unit’s gross residential floor area is more than 500 square feet, but less than 2,000 square feet 2 spaces If a dwelling unit’s gross residential floor area is 2,000 square feet or more 2.5 spaces Retail stores, personal services, and repair shops 1 space per each 300 square feet of net floor area In addition to the defined uses and parking needs above, EHUs required by inclusionary zoning and/or commercial linkage have parking needs/requirements. Guidance from Title 12, Chapter 24, Section 3 says, “Generally. Parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this title.” However, “At the discretion of the applicable governing body, variations to the parking standards outlined in Chapter 10 of this title may be approved during the review of an employee housing plan subject to a parking management plan.” For our calculations, we treat apartment-style EHUs like multi-family dwellings with the same parking requirements. Dormitory-style EHUs don’t have an obvious comparison to the standard dwelling-unit categories, so we provide a parking management plan with our reasoning outlined below. PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR CMC DORMITORY-STYLE EHUs We consider a need for 6 parking spots for the CMC dormitory remodel by considering the programmatic context and the physical design of the dormitory. Programmatic Context The CMC dormitory retrofit will become a place to house workers for the Grand Hyatt Hotel. These workers will be workers and students on the J-1 exchange visitor visa, which is an educational and cultural exchange program designated by the Department of State. We expect the associated parking need for this dormitory to be low because J-1 students rarely, if ever, have personal vehicles. Furthermore, J-1 staff living in this dormitory will be living at their place of employment and will have access to public transportation and the Gore Creek Path to get around Vail for other daily needs like grocery shopping and recreation. Physical Design The dormitory’s physical design incorporates a three-unit concept, where each unit’s sleeping areas are arranged around a centralized living space (see Figure 1). Following this logic, we think of this 5,700-square- foot dorm space as comprising three 1,900-square-foot units. If we apply parking standards to these units as if they were dwelling units per the Town Code, we would add 2 parking spots per unit. That results in 6 parking spots total for the dormitory. We find 6 parking spots for this 5,700-square-foot, 22-bed dormitory to be a reasonable parking allocation. More than 25% of staff living here could have a personal vehicle. We believe this number may overestimate the actual parking needs considering the infrequency of staff who live here owning a car. However, having 6 associated parking spots will be helpful to account for any staff who may have a car. Figure 1 Floor Plan for CMC Dormitory TABLE 2: SDD4 AMENDMENT PARKING NEEDS CALCULATION (Considers Cornerstone and the CMC Basement Remodel) USE CODE DEFINED USE QUANTITY SQ. FT. *MULTIPLIER /DIVISOR PARKING REQUIREMENT Small Dwelling Units 500 sq. Ft. < Dwelling Unit > 2000 sq. Ft. 26 - * 2 52 Large Dwelling Units Dwelling Unit > 2,000 4 - * 2.5 10 Cornerstone Apartment-style EHUs 500 sq. Ft. < Dwelling Unit > 2000 sq. Ft. 2 - *2 4 CORNERSTONE RESIDENTIAL SUBTOTAL - - - - 66 Retail Retail stores, personal services, and repair shops - 3,500 / 300 11.7 Vail Ticketing Office Existing use - 775 Replace existing use Replace existing use CMC dormitory- style EHUs N/A *See the parking management plan for an explanation of how we arrive at a requirement of 6 parking spots. 6* TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED - - - - 83.7 This parking needs assessment discloses a need for 83.7 parking spaces, of which 66 are for residential/employee housing uses within the Cornerstone Building. The project team thinks it is optimal for these residential parking spots to be provided in the Cornerstone building itself. Therefore, 67 parking spaces will be provided in the Cornerstone building, and these spots will be dedicated to employee housing units and apartment owners. The remaining 17.7 parking spaces pertain to parking for the CMC dormitory and tourism-oriented commercial uses, such as the Vail ticketing office and après eating/drinking establishments. The parking for this portion of the requirement will be located in the Aria Building parking garage, which already serves Cascade Village as the primary parking garage for the Grand Hyatt Hotel, all commercial uses, and access to the neighborhood, including the chairlift. The parking generated by these new uses is likely to be less than required by the Town Code’s parking standards because most customers and skiers will likely walk, ski, or take the bus to the ski lift and Cornerstone area from lodging or residences in the neighborhood. In any case, the project team provides the required parking spaces in accordance with the code. The table below demonstrates the capacity of the Aria Building to absorb the left-over 17.7 space parking requirement from the Cornerstone project. TABLE 3: ARIA BUILDING EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKING ALLOCATIONS Aria Parking Garage Capacity (from 2008 table) 421 USE STATUS PARKING SPACES Grand Hyatt Hotel Existing 408.5 CMC Residences Existing 16 CMC office Existing 16.3 Cornerstone retail Proposed 11.7 CMC dormitory-style EHU Proposed 6 Subtotal - 458.5 10% multiple-use credit applied - - Total Required - 413 (412.65) TABLE 3.2: SUMMARY OF PARKING COMPLIANCE Required Parking Spots from this amendment 83.7 Parking provided in Cornerstone 67 Parking provided in Aria (see Table 3) 17.7 Parking surplus 1 GRFA FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS This proposed major amendment to Special Development District 4 would decrease the Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) previously approved in 2008. This is because the new Cornerstone Building adds less density to the district than the combined development proposals in 2008 (CMC redevelopment plus previous Cornerstone application). The following tables show the approved density from the previous major amendment in 2008, the proposed density from this amendment, and the breakdown of units provided in the new Cornerstone Building. TABLE 4: APPROVED GRFA FROM THE PREVIOUS MAJOR AMENDMENT (TABLE 1, 2008) BUILDING STATUS GRFA Dwelling Units Liftside Condos (formerly Waterford) Existing 48,600 29 Westhaven Condominiums Existing 32,000 13 Millrace (Phase I, II, and IV) Existing 47,984 39 The Cascades (formerly Millrace III) Existing 11,987 6 Cascade Hotel Existing 120,731* - Cascade Residences Approved, partially- existing 47,151 22 Cornerstone (2008 version) Approved, non-existing 48,407 22 Approved GRFA Subtotal 356,860 131 *The GRFA from Cascade Hotel comes from accommodation units, not dwelling units. TABLE 5: PROPOSED GRFA AMENDMENT TO THE SDD#4 BUILDING STATUS GRFA Dwelling Units Liftside Condos (formerly Waterford) Existing 48,600 29 Westhaven Condominiums Existing 32,000 13 Millrace (Phase I, II, and IV) Existing 47,984 39 The Cascades (formerly Millrace III) Existing 11,987 6 Cascade Hotel Existing 120,731 - Cascade Residences Existing 16,924 8 Existing GRFA Subtotal Existing 278,226 Cornerstone Proposed 62,299 30 Total GRFA 340,525 125 TABLE 6: CORNERSTONE UNIT GRFA CALCULATIONS EMPLOYEE HOUSING CALCULATIONS The provided employee housing for the new Cornerstone Building aligns with the requirements of both the inclusionary zoning and commercial linkage chapters of the Town Code. Calculations are provided below to demonstrate this compliance. APPLICABLE RULES From Chapter 23 – Commercial Linkage The employee generation rates found in Table 23-1, “Employee Generation Rates By Type Of Commercial Use”, of this section, shall be applied to each type of use in a commercial development. For any use not listed, the Administrator shall determine the applicable employee generation rate by consulting the town’s current nexus study (§ 12-23-2). The only commercial uses in Cornerstone are retail and the Vail ticketing office. Both fall into the category of “Retail store/personal service/repair shop” under the Town Code. According to Table 23-1, this use type generates 2.4 employees per 1,000 feet of new net floor area. Each commercial development or redevelopment shall mitigate its impact on employee housing by providing EHUs for 20% of the employees generated, pursuant to Table 23-1 of this section, or the nexus study, in accordance with the requirements of this chapter (§ 12-23-2). For all new construction (i.e., development that does not affect any existing buildings or structures) and demo/rebuild projects that result in a mitigation requirement of 1.25 employees or greater, no less than one-half the mitigation of employee housing required by this chapter shall be accomplished with on site units (§ 12-23-6). From Chapter 24 - Inclusionary Zoning: Every residential development and redevelopment shall be required to mitigate its direct and secondary impacts on the town by providing employee housing at a mitigation rate of 10% of the total new GRFA (§ 12-24-2). For all new construction (i.e., development that does not affect any existing buildings or structures) and demo/rebuild projects that result in a mitigation requirement of 438 square feet or greater, no less than one-half the mitigation of employee housing required by this chapter shall be accomplished with on site units (§ 12-24-6). COMMERCIAL LINKAGE CALCULATION The math below outlines the commercial linkage EHU requirement for all of Cornerstone’s commercial uses. TABLE 7: COMMERCIAL LINKAGE CALCULATION COMMERCIAL LINKAGE USE SF PROVIDED USE AS DEFINED BY CODE COMMERCIAL LINKAGE RULE EMPLOYEES GENERATED East Restaurant 2,560 Eating and drinking establishment 10.2 employees per 1,000 feet of new net floor area 26 (26.11) West Coffee Shop 840 Eating and drinking establishment 10.2 employees per 1,000 feet of new net floor area 9 (8.57) Ticket Office 775 Existing use Replace existing space and use 0 Employees Generated Subtotal - - 35 20% Mitigation Requirement Applied - - 7 50% On-Site Mitigation Requirement Applied - 3.5 The 50% on-site mitigation requirement of 3.5 employees must be mitigated through on-site EHUs. The remaining 3.5 employees may be mitigated through one or any combination of the following: on-site EHUs, off-site EHUs, payment of fees in lieu, or conveyance of vacant property off-site. INCLUSIONARY ZONING CALCULATION The math below outlines the inclusionary zoning EHU requirement for Cornerstone’s residential development. Cornerstone GRFA 62,299 10% mitigation requirement applied 6,229.9 50% On-Site mitigation requirement applied 3,114.95 The 50% on-site mitigation requirement of 3,114.95 square feet must be mitigated through on-site EHUs. The remaining 3,114.95 square feet may be mitigated through one or any combination of the following: on-site EHUs, off-site EHUs, payment of fees in lieu, or conveyance of vacant property off-site. TOTAL REQUIREMENT AND PROVISION TABLE 8: PROVIDED EHUS USE SQ. FT. QUANTITY Beds In-building EHU 2,060 2 4 CMC building EHU 5,700 1 22 On-site EHU Total 7,760 3 26 TABLE 9: REQUIRED EHUS REQUIREMENT SQ. FT. REQUIRED MITIGATION STRATEGY On-Site Commercial Linkage 3.5 employees 875 (3.5 * 250) On-site EHUs Off-Site Commercial Linkage 2.5 employees 625 (3.5 * 250) On-site EHUs 1 employee - Fee paid in lieu On-Site Inclusionary Zoning 3,114.95 square feet 3,114.95 On-site EHUs Off-Site Inclusionary Zoning 3,114.95 square feet 3,114.95 On-site EHUs Required Square Footage 7,729.9 Provided Square Footage (See Table 8) 7,760.0 SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CALCULATIONS The last major amendment to SDD #4 was codified by Ordinance 5 of 2008. The development statistics from that ordinance accounted for two development proposals that never happened. As a result, the 2008 ordinance has greater density allowances than what exists on site. This next section goes over the new proposed amendments to SDD #4 that would update the site development standards from Ordinance 5 of 2008. These proposed amendments would alter the SDD to accommodate for the development of the new Cornerstone Building proposal, while also adjusting the site development standards to match how the district has changed since 2008. LAND USE APPLICANT COMMENT: The schedule of permitted, conditional, and accessory land uses will not change in this amendment. The previously approved ordinance defining SDD #4 included a lengthy list of permitted uses for Area A of Cascade Village. Retail and multi-family dwellings are both permitted uses. None of the proposed uses in Cornerstone are conditional or accessory use types. PROPOSED LAND USE STANDARD: No amendment, the previous language regarding permitted, conditional, and accessory uses will not change. DENSITY APPLICANT COMMENT: The overall residential density of SDD #4 if this amendment with the Cornerstone building proposal is passed, will slightly decrease from the 2008 approval. This is because the new Cornerstone Building proposes 30 dwelling units while SDD #4 is currently short 36 units from the approved 2008 ordinance. Similarly, the new Cornerstone Building proposes 62,473 GRFA while SDD #4 is short 78,634 GRFA from the approved 2008 ordinance. Therefore, the proposed amendment will represent a decrease in the overall district density from what is currently allowed (See Tables 4 and 5). EXISTING DENSITY STANDARD: “In Area A, a total of two hundred eighty-eight (288) accommodation of transient dwelling units and a maximum of one hundred thirty-one (131) dwelling units for a total density of two hundred seventy-five (275) dwelling units.” “Area A, Cascade Village – The gross residential floor area (GRFA) for all buildings shall not exceed 356,680 square feet.” PROPOSED DENSITY STANDARD: “In Area A, a total of two hundred eighty-eight (288) accommodation of transient dwelling units and a maximum of one hundred thirty-one (129) dwelling units for a total density of two hundred seventy-three (273) dwelling units.” “Area A, Cascade Village – The gross residential floor area (GRFA) for all buildings shall not exceed 340,699 square feet.” SETBACKS APPLICANT COMMENT: The new Cornerstone Building has no implications requiring us to change the existing setback development standards. The development plan for Cornerstone does not violate the minimum setback of 20 feet on the periphery of Area A and will comply with setback standards by indicating its setbacks in the development plan. PROPOSED LAND USE STANDARD: No amendment, the previous language regarding setbacks will not change. HEIGHT APPLICANT COMMENT: The amendment will propose an adjustment to the height development standard, allowing for a taller building than previously approved at the Cornerstone site. Even though the amendment increases the height of Cornerstone as defined by code, the actual perceived height of the largest part of the building from street level is only 71 feet. EXISTING HEIGHT STANDARD: “Cornerstone Building: Maximum height of 71 feet” PROPOSED HEIGHT STANDARD: “Cornerstone Building: Maximum height of 97 feet” SITE COVERAGE APPLICANT COMMENT: The existing standard for site coverage allows whatever site coverage is approved in the development plan. The site coverage of the Cornerstone Building footprint equals 79.5% of the site. (24,152 sf / 30,393 sf). LANDSCAPING APPLICANT COMMENT: The existing standard for landscaping allows whatever landscaping is approved in the development plan. The landscaping coverage of the Cornerstone development is 20.5%, which includes 1,745 square feet of planted area and the rest is pavers, sidewalks, and circulation. PARKING AND LOADING APPLICANT COMMENT: The new Cornerstone Building has no implications requiring us to change the existing parking and loading requirements. The development plan for Cornerstone will comply with Chapter 12-10 of Vail Town Code, and 100% of parking will be located within a parking structure. PROPOSED PARKING AND LOADING STANDARD: No amendment, the previous language regarding parking and loading will not change. TABLE 10: FINAL AMENDED DISTRICT STATS USE DUs AUs GRFA EHUs EHU SQ. FT. COMM SQ. FT. ON-SITE PARKING ARIA GARAGE PARKING Liftside Condos (Formerly Waterford) 29 - 48,600 2 Unknown - 56 - Westhaven Condominiums 13 - 32,000 - - - 29 - Millrace (Phase I, II, IV) 39 - 47,984 - - - 64 - The Cascades (Formerly Millrace III) 6 - 11,987 - - - 12 - CMC – Cascade Residences 8 - 16,924 - - - - 16 CMC – Offices - - - - - 5,061 - 16.3 CMC – Dormitory EHUs - - - 1 5,700 - - 6 Cascade Hotel – Rooms - 288 120,731 - - - - 236 Cascade Hotel – Commercial Uses - - - - - 18,754 - 137.5 Cascade Hotel – Conference Uses - - - - - 10,070.7 - 35 Cornerstone 30 - 62,299 2 2,060 4,175 66 11.7 Total 125 288 340,525 5 7,760 + 38,060.7 227 458.5 Multiple Use Credit Applied (10% of required) -45.85 Parking Required 413 (412.65) Total Parking Spaces Provided in Aria 421 NOTE: REFER TO SHEET A-11 FOR OVERALL FLOOR PLANS SHOWING GRFA CALCULATION AREAS. NOTE: REFER TO SHEET A-22 FOR FLOOR PLAN OVERLAY SHOWING SITE COVERAGE CALCULATION AREAS. 143 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PRO G RESS PRIN TS NO T FO R CO NS TRU CTIO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 1 1 :0 3 :2 0 A M 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 0 3 : 2 0 A M 24900.00 G-03 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 EXISTING SITE CONTEXT 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 1 5 9 13 15 16 14 11 12 7 8 432 6 10 KEY PLAN 144 UP UP UP UP UP UP UP UP LEVEL 1 FF=74.00 LEVEL 2 FF=48.00 LEVEL 1 FF=74.00 LEVEL 2 FF=48.00 PLAZA FF=74.00 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100Denver, CO 80205303.861.8555 PRO G RES S PRI NT S NO T FO R CO NS TRU C T I O N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Stamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 3 :0 8 :2 6 P M 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 3 : 0 8 : 2 6 P M 24900.00 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 77 Metcalf Road, Suite 301 Avon, Colorado 81620 970.926.6007 martinmartin.com C-1 SITE PLAN 145 UP UP UP UP UP UP UP UP LEVEL 1 FF=74.00 LEVEL 2 FF=48.00 LEVEL 1 FF=74.00 LEVEL 2 FF=48.00 PLAZA FF=74.00 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100Denver, CO 80205303.861.8555 PRO G RES S PRI NT S NO T FO R CO NS TRU C T I O N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Stamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 3 :0 8 :2 6 P M 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 3 : 0 8 : 2 6 P M 24900.00 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 77 Metcalf Road, Suite 301 Avon, Colorado 81620 970.926.6007 martinmartin.com C-2 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN 146 UP 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 ELECTRICAL ELEVATOR OWNER'S LOUNGE 837 SF RETAIL 1 MECHANICAL MECHANICAL 774 SF TICKET & PATROL OFFICE 2560 SF RETAIL 2 CORRIDOR VESTIBULE PUBLIC ELEVATOR WOMEN'S RESTROOMMEN'S RESTROOM MECHANICAL ELEVATORELEVATOR STAIR 28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"22'-6"18'-0"28'-6"28'-6"15'-6"13'-0"7'-6"21'-0"6'-6" 14 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 3'- 0 " 30 ' - 0 " A1 A-18 A1 A-18 D5 A-19 D5 A-19 A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 GRAND HYATT CASCADE CHAIRLIFT 303'-6" 90 ' - 0 " CORRIDOR OWNER STORAGE, TYP.OWNER STORAGE, TYP. MECHANICAL 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 2 :5 9 :3 3 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 2 : 5 9 : 3 3 P M 24900.00 A-02 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL P2 - PASEO 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. N 1/8" = 1'-0"B1 LEVEL P2 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 147 UP UP 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 STAIR ELEVATOR STAIR ELEVATOR PUBLIC ELEVATOR STAIR ELEVATOR 75 862 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 64 60 56 39 31 4 41 42 43 34 33 38 40 44 47 52 48 35 36 49 5759616365 53 46 45 51 54665862 55 37 CLEAR 5'-0" ELEV. LOBBY ELEV. LOBBY ELEV. LOBBY 50 DR I V E L A N E 24 ' - 0 " A1 A-18 A1 A-18 D5 A-19 D5 A-19 A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"22'-6"18'-0"28'-6"28'-6"15'-6"13'-0"7'-6"21'-0"6'-6" 14 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 3'- 0 " 30 ' - 0 " 303'-6" 90 ' - 0 " 67 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 2 :5 9 :3 6 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 2 : 5 9 : 3 6 P M 24900.00 A-03 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL P1 - PARKING 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. N 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 LEVEL P1 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 148 UP UP 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 STAIR STAIR LOBBY UNIT A UNIT B UNIT B EHU | UNIT CEHU | UNIT C UNIT M UNIT P LOBBY UNIT D STAIR ELEVATOR STAIR PUBLIC ELEVATOR ELEVATOR STAIR ELEVATOR STAIR OWNER'S LOUNGE / AMENITY PLAZA A1 A-18 A1 A-18 D5 A-19 D5 A-19A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"22'-6"18'-0"28'-6"28'-6"15'-6"13'-0"7'-6"21'-0"6'-6" 14 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 3'- 0 " 30 ' - 0 " 303'-6" 90 ' - 0 " 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 2 :5 9 :4 1 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 2 : 5 9 : 4 1 P M 24900.00 A-04 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL ONE - PLAZA 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. N 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 LEVEL 1 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'32'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 149 UP 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 STAIRSTAIR STAIR STAIR UNIT HUNIT E UNIT N UNIT P UNIT F UNIT G ELEVATORELEVATOR ELEVATOR OVERRUN ELEVATOR STAIR STAIR CORRIDOR VESTIBULE CORRIDOR VESTIBULE CORRIDOR A1 A-18 A1 A-18 D5 A-19 D5 A-19A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"22'-6"18'-0"28'-6"28'-6"15'-6"13'-0"7'-6"21'-0"6'-6" 14 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 3'- 0 " 30 ' - 0 " 303'-6" 90 ' - 0 " 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 2 :5 9 :4 4 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 2 : 5 9 : 4 4 P M 24900.00 A-05 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL TWO 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. N 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 LEVEL 2 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'32'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 150 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 STAIRSTAIR STAIR STAIR UNIT E UNIT G UNIT H UNIT PUNIT N UNIT F ELEVATOR STAIR ELEVATOR STAIR ELEVATOR CORRIDOR VESTIBULE CORRIDOR VESTIBULE CORRIDOR A1 A-18 A1 A-18 D5 A-19 D5 A-19 A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"22'-6"18'-0"28'-6"28'-6"15'-6"13'-0"7'-6"21'-0"6'-6" 14 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 3'- 0 " 30 ' - 0 " 303'-6" 90 ' - 0 " 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 2 :5 9 :4 8 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 2 : 5 9 : 4 8 P M 24900.00 A-06 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL THREE 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. N 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 LEVEL 3 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'32'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 151 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR UNIT E UNIT G UNIT HUNIT F UNIT N UNIT P ELEVATOR ELEVATOR STAIR ELEVATOR STAIR VESTIBULE CORRIDOR CORRIDOR VESTIBULE CORRIDOR A1 A-18 A1 A-18 D5 A-19 D5 A-19 A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"22'-6"18'-0"28'-6"28'-6"15'-6"13'-0"7'-6"21'-0"6'-6" 14 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 3'- 0 " 30 ' - 0 " 303'-6" 90 ' - 0 " 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 2 :5 9 :5 1 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 2 : 5 9 : 5 1 P M 24900.00 A-07 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL FOUR 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. N 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 LEVEL 4 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'32'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 152 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 UNIT E UNIT G UNIT H STAIR ELEVATOR STAIR STAIR ELEVATOR STAIR CORRIDOR VESTIBULE CORRIDOR UNIT F A1 A-18 A1 A-18 D5 A-19 D5 A-19 A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 1" / 12"1" / 12" 28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"22'-6"18'-0"28'-6"28'-6"15'-6"13'-0"7'-6"21'-0"6'-6" 14 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 3'- 0 " 30 ' - 0 " 303'-6" 90 ' - 0 " 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 2 :5 9 :5 4 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 2 : 5 9 : 5 4 P M 24900.00 A-08 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL FIVE 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. N 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 LEVEL 5 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'32'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 153 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 STAIR STAIR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR UNIT GUNIT F VESTIBULE CORRIDOR CORRIDOR A1 A-18 A1 A-18 D5 A-19 D5 A-19 A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 1 1/4" / 12"1 1/4" / 12"1 1/4" / 12"1 1/2" / 12" 28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"22'-6"18'-0"28'-6"28'-6"15'-6"13'-0"7'-6"21'-0"6'-6" 14 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 3'- 0 " 30 ' - 0 " 303'-6" 90 ' - 0 " 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 2 :5 9 :5 5 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 2 : 5 9 : 5 5 P M 24900.00 A-09 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL SIX 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. N 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 LEVEL 6 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'32'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 154 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 1 1/4" / 12"1 1/4" / 12" 2" / 12"2" / 12"1 1/4" / 12"1 1/2" / 12"1" / 12"1" / 12"1" / 12" A1 A-18 A1 A-18 D5 A-19 D5 A-19 A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"22'-6"18'-0"28'-6"28'-6"15'-6"13'-0"7'-6"21'-0"6'-6" 14 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 3'- 0 " 30 ' - 0 " 303'-6" 90 ' - 0 " 2 1 / 8 " / 1 2 " 8 3 / 8 " / 1 2 " 2" / 12"2" / 12" 1" / 12" ELEVATOR OVERRUN ELEVATOR OVERRUN ELEVATOR OVERRUN SNOW GUARD, TYP. ROOF & OVERFLOW DRAIN, TYP. ROOF & OVERFLOW DRAIN, TYP. SNOW GUARD, TYP. ROOF & OVERFLOW DRAIN, TYP.WEST BLDG. RIDGE 197'-0"EAST BLDG. RIDGE 171'-0" SNOW GUARD, TYP. GUTTER, TYP. GUTTER, TYP. SNOW GUARD, TYP. GUTTER, TYP. GUTTER, TYP. CHIMNEY, TYP. CHIMNEY, TYP. CHIMNEY, TYP. 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 2 :5 9 :5 8 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 2 : 5 9 : 5 8 P M 24900.00 A-10 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - ROOF LEVEL 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. N 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 ROOF - OVERALL ROOF PLAN - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 155 UP UP UP UNIT B 1,200 SF UNIT B 1,200 SF UNIT D 1,965 SF UNIT A 1,910 SF EHU | UNIT C 1,030 SF EHU | UNIT C 1,030 SF UNIT M 1,645 SF UNIT P 1,999 SF UNIT E 1,999 SF UNIT F 1,999 SF UNIT G 1,999 SF UNIT H 3,100 SF UNIT N 1,999 SF UNIT P 1,999 SF UNIT E 1,999 SF UNIT F 1,999 SF UNIT G 1,999 SF UNIT H 3,100 SF UNIT N 1,999 SF UNIT P 1,999 SF UNIT E 1,999 SF UNIT F 1,999 SF UNIT G 1,999 SF UNIT H 3,100 SF UNIT N 1,999 SF UNIT P 1,999 SF UNIT E 1,999 SF UNIT F 1,999 SF UNIT G 1,999 SF UNIT H 3,100 SF UNIT F 1,999 SF UNIT G 1,999 SF N 1/16" = 1'-0"A1 LEVEL 1 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - GRFA N 1/16" = 1'-0"E4 LEVEL 6 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - GRFA N 1/16" = 1'-0"C4 LEVEL 5 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - GRFA N 1/16" = 1'-0"A4 LEVEL 4 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - GRFA N 1/16" = 1'-0"E1 LEVEL 3 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - GRFA N 1/16" = 1'-0"C1 LEVEL 2 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - GRFA 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 :0 0 :1 5 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 0 0 : 1 5 P M 24900.00 A-11 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLANS - GRFA CALCULATIONS 4/29/2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 0'8'16'32'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'32'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'32'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'32'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'32'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'32'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" NOTE:REFER TO SHEET G-02 FOR PROJECT MATRIX & TABLE SHOWING GRFA TOTALS. 156 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PRO G RESS PRIN TS NO T FO R CO NS TRU CTIO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 1 0 :5 9 :5 0 A M 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 0 : 5 9 : 5 0 A M 24900.00 A-12 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 ELEVATIONS 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 2 A12 1/8" = 1'-0" EAST ELEVATION 1 A12 1/8" = 1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND 1. STONE VENEER TO MATCH EXISTING HOTEL 2. STOREFRONT SYSTEM, BLACK 3. EXPOSED GLULAMS, PINE FINISH 4. 8" CONCRETE PRECAST CAP 5. ALUMINUM METAL PANEL, BLACK 6. STEEL VERTICAL PICKET RAILING, BLACK 7. ALUMINUM PUNCHED OPENING, BLACK 8. ACM METAL PANEL SYSTEM, COPPER COLOR 9. SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING 10. DOUBLE FACIA, BLACK METAL PANEL 11. WOOD SOFFIT W/ REVEALS, PINE FINISH 12. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF, TO MATCH EXISTING 13. BUILDING SIGNAGE 14. WOOD TRELLIS, PINE FINISH 15. STANDING SEAM CANOPY 16. ESCALATOR DOWN TO PASEO 17. PUBLIC ELEVATOR DOWN TO PASEO 18. BUILDING LIGHTING, DOWN ONLY 19. ELEVATOR OVERRUN 20. GAS CHIMNEY ROOF EXHAUST 21. SNOW FENCE AND GUTTERS AS NEEDED T.O.ROOF 197'-0" LEVEL 6 178'-6" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 1 126'-0" LEVEL P1 114'-0" LEVEL P2 100'-0" PASEO LEVELPASEO LEVEL PASEO LEVEL DROP OFF 10 ' - 6 " 17 ' - 0 " 96 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E P A S E O 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 0 " 71 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E P A S E O 12 12 3 7 9 4 1 8 11 14 6 7 16 8 5 T.O.ROOF 197'-0" LEVEL 6 178'-6" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 1 126'-0" LEVEL P1 114'-0" LEVEL P2 100'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 2 136'-6" TOP OF ROOF 171'-0" 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 45 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E U P P E R P L A Z A 71 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E P A S E O 96 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E P A S E O 12,16 10 10 1 88 33 9 5 13 8 7 17 18 14 13 15 7 3 3 6 8 4 4 17 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 6 " 2 9 2 14 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 0 " 20 20 21 20 19 19 157 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PRO G RESS PRIN TS NO T FO R CO NS TRU CTIO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 1 1 :0 0 :0 3 A M 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 0 0 : 0 3 A M 24900.00 A-13 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 ELEVATIONS 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 1 A13 1/8" = 1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION 2 A13 1/8" = 1'-0" WEST ELEVATION LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL P2 100'-0" T.O.ROOF 197'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 1 126'-0" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 6 178'-6" LEVEL P1 114'-0" PASEO LEVEL 96'- 0" ABOVE TH E PASEO LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL P2 100'-0" T.O.ROOF 197'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 1 126'-0" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 6 178'-6" LEVEL P1 114'-0" 1 4 13 1 14 2 6 7 9 3 8 5 12 10 11 1 13 8 5 10 3 16 6 7 3 10 7 5 3 8 9 9 3 14 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 17 ' - 0 " WESTHAVEN DR 7 99 14 LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 2 136'-6" TOP OF ROOF 171'-0" 45 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E U P P E R P L A Z A 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 71 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E U P P E R P L A Z A 18 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 17 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 0 " 17 MATERIAL LEGEND 1. STONE VENEER TO MATCH EXISTING HOTEL 2. STOREFRONT SYSTEM, BLACK 3. EXPOSED GLULAMS, PINE FINISH 4. 8" CONCRETE PRECAST CAP 5. ALUMINUM METAL PANEL, BLACK 6. STEEL VERTICAL PICKET RAILING, BLACK 7. ALUMINUM PUNCHED OPENING, BLACK 8. ACM METAL PANEL SYSTEM, COPPER COLOR 9. SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING 10. DOUBLE FACIA, BLACK METAL PANEL 11. WOOD SOFFIT W/ REVEALS, PINE FINISH 12. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF, TO MATCH EXISTING 13. BUILDING SIGNAGE 14. WOOD TRELLIS, PINE FINISH 15. STANDING SEAM CANOPY 16. ESCALATOR DOWN TO PASEO 17. PUBLIC ELEVATOR DOWN TO PASEO 18. BUILDING LIGHTING, DOWN ONLY 19. ELEVATOR OVERRUN 20. GAS CHIMNEY ROOF EXHAUST 21. SNOW FENCE AND GUTTERS AS NEEDED 19 20 19 19 20 158 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PRO G RESS PRIN TS NO T FO R CO NS TRU CTIO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 1 1 :0 0 :2 2 A M 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 0 0 : 2 2 A M 24900.00 A-14 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 PROJECT RENDERINGS 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. WEST BUILDING - SOUTH ELEVATION AT THE PASEO BUILDING IN THE FOREGROUND REMOVED FOR CLARITY WEST BUILDING - NORTHEAST CORNER ALONG FRONTAGE RD MAIN ENTRY AT THE PASEO WEST BUILDING - SOUTHWEST CORNER EAST BUILDING - NORTHEAST CORNER WEST BUILDING - NORTHWEST CORNER 159 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PRO G RESS PRIN TS NO T FO R CO NS TRU CTIO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 1 1 :0 0 :3 8 A M 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 0 0 : 3 8 A M 24900.00 A-15 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 PROJECT RENDERINGS 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. SOUTH ELEVATION ALONG THE PASEO EXISTING BUILDING IN THE FOREGROUND REMOVED FOR CLARITY EAST BUILDING NORTH ELEVATIONEAST BUILDING SOUTH ELEVATION 160 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PRO G RESS PRIN TS NO T FO R CO NS TRU CTIO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 1 1 :0 0 :5 4 A M 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 0 0 : 5 4 A M 24900.00 A-16 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 MATERIAL BOARD 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 161 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PRO G RESS PRIN TS NO T FO R CO NS TRU CTIO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 1 1 :0 1 :0 5 A M 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 0 1 : 0 5 A M 24900.00 A-17 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 MATERIAL BOARD 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 162 LEVEL P2 -PASEO 100'-0" LEVEL P2 -PASEO 100'-0" 01 02 03 04 05 ROOF 197'-0" ROOF 197'-0" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 1 -PLAZA 126'-0" LEVEL 1 -PLAZA 126'-0" LEVEL P1 -PARKING 114'-0" LEVEL P1 -PARKING 114'-0" 06 08 09 10 12 LEVEL 6 178'-6" LEVEL 6 178'-6" 1407 151311 PARKING GARAGE UNIT P UNIT P UNIT P UNIT PUNIT N UNIT N UNIT N UNIT MUNIT A UNIT E UNIT H UNIT H UNIT H UNIT HUNIT G UNIT G UNIT G UNIT G UNIT G UNIT F UNIT F UNIT F UNIT E UNIT E UNIT E 28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"22'-6"18'-0"28'-6"28'-6"15'-6"13'-0"7'-6"21'-0"6'-6" 18 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 0 " UNIT F UNIT F PARKING GARAGE D5 A-19 D5 A-19 A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 OWNER'S LOUNGE MECHANICAL VESTIBULE RETAIL 2 UNIT DUNIT BUNIT B EA S T B U I L D I N G R I D G E 71 ' - 0 " WE S T B U I L D I N G R I D G E 97 ' - 0 " MEN'S RESTROOM WOMEN'S RESTROOM PUBLIC ELEVATOR CORRIDOR 8,048.00' 8,062.00' 8,074.00' 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 :0 0 :3 1 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 0 0 : 3 1 P M 24900.00 A-18 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 BUILDING SECTIONS 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 1/8" = 1'-0"A1 BUILDING SECTION - E/W - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 163 LEVEL P2 -PASEO 100'-0" LEVEL P2 -PASEO 100'-0" G E C A ROOF 197'-0" ROOF 197'-0" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 1 -PLAZA 126'-0" LEVEL 1 -PLAZA 126'-0" LEVEL P1 -PARKING 114'-0" LEVEL P1 -PARKING 114'-0" LEVEL 6 178'-6" LEVEL 6 178'-6" F BD A1 A-18 A1 A-18 18 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 0 " 30'-0"3'-0"15'-0"12'-0"16'-0"14'-0" OWNER'S LOUNGE CORRIDOR PARKING GARAGE UNIT B CORRIDOR EHU | UNIT C UNIT G UNIT G UNIT G UNIT G UNIT G 71 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " LEVEL P2 -PASEO 100'-0" LEVEL P2 -PASEO 100'-0" G E C A ROOF 197'-0" ROOF 197'-0" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 1 -PLAZA 126'-0" LEVEL 1 -PLAZA 126'-0" LEVEL P1 -PARKING 114'-0" LEVEL P1 -PARKING 114'-0" LEVEL 6 178'-6" LEVEL 6 178'-6" F BD A1 A-18 A1 A-18 PARKING GARAGE 18 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 0 " 30'-0"3'-0"15'-0"12'-0"16'-0"14'-0" MEN'S RESTROOM CORRIDORVESTIBULE LEVEL P2 -PASEO 100'-0" LEVEL P2 -PASEO 100'-0" G E C A ROOF 197'-0" ROOF 197'-0" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 1 -PLAZA 126'-0" LEVEL 1 -PLAZA 126'-0" LEVEL P1 -PARKING 114'-0" LEVEL P1 -PARKING 114'-0" LEVEL 6 178'-6" LEVEL 6 178'-6" F BD A1 A-18 A1 A-18 UNIT P UNIT P UNIT P UNIT P 18 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 0 " 30'-0"3'-0"15'-0"12'-0"16'-0"14'-0" PARKING GARAGE RETAIL 2 MECHANICAL 69 ' - 5 5 / 8 " 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 :0 0 :5 6 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 0 0 : 5 6 P M 24900.00 A-19 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 BUILDING SECTIONS 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 1/8" = 1'-0"A1 BUILDING SECTION - WEST BUILDING N/S - PEC 1/8" = 1'-0"A5 BUILDING SECTION - ESCALATOR N/S - PEC 1/8" = 1'-0"D5 BUILDING SECTION - EAST BUILDING N/S - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 164 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PRO G RESS PRIN TS NO T FO R CO NS TRU CTIO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 1 1 :0 1 :1 8 A M 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 0 1 : 1 8 A M 24900.00 A-20 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 165 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PRO G RE SS PRINTS NO T FO R CO NSTRUCT IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 1 1 :0 1 :3 0 A M 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 0 1 : 3 0 A M 24900.00 A-21 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 166 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"22'-6"18'-0"28'-6"28'-6"15'-6"13'-0"7'-6"21'-0"6'-6" 14 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 3'- 0 " 30 ' - 0 " GRAND HYATT CASCADE CHAIRLIFT 303'-6" 90 ' - 0 " LEVEL 1 BUILDING SITE COVERAGE LEVELS 2 & ABOVE BUILDING SITE COVERAGE LEVEL P1 (PARKING GARAGE) BUILDING SITE COVERAGE LEVEL P2 (PASEO LEVEL)BUILDING SITE COVERAGE OVERALL BUILDING SITE COVERAGE = 24,152 SF (79.5%) SITE AREA = 30,393 SF 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 :0 1 :0 0 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 0 1 : 0 0 P M 24900.00 A-22 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 OVERALL PLAN - SITE COVERAGE 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. N 1/8" = 1'-0"B1 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - SITE COVERAGE 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" NOTE:REFER TO SHEET G-02 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION RELATED TO SITE COVERAGE & LANDSCAPING. 167 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PRO G RESS PRIN TS NO T FO R CO NS TRU CTIO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 1 1 :0 2 :1 4 A M 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 0 2 : 1 4 A M 24900.00 L-900 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 LANDSCAPE RENDERINGS 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. WEST ENTRY INTO THE PASEO WEST ENTRY INTO THE PASEO COURTYARD SUMMER/ SPRING COURTYARD FALL/ WINTER AERIAL OF THE PASEO PASEO LOOKING WEST 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PROGRESS PRINTS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: RevisionsDateNo. Sheet Information Project Information IssuanceDate Consultant(s) 123456 123456RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 GG 4/12/2024 11:01:30 AM 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 0 1 : 3 0 A M 24900.00 A-21 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 173 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 A1 A-18 A1 A-18 D5 A-19 D5 A-19 A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 GRAND HYATT CASCADE CHAIRLIFT ELECTRICAL ELEVATOR OWNER'S LOUNGERETAIL 1 MECHANICAL MECHANICAL TICKET & PATROL OFFICE RETAIL 2 CORRIDOR VESTIBULE PUBLIC ELEVATOR WOMEN'S RESTROOMMEN'S RESTROOM MECHANICAL ELEVATORELEVATOR STAIR CORRIDOR OWNER STORAGE, TYP.OWNER STORAGE, TYP. MECHANICAL 16' AFF 16' AFF 12' AFF (IN SOFFIT) 12' AFF (IN SOFFIT) 14' AFF (IN SOFFIT)14' AFF (IN SOFFIT) ES3 ES3 ES3 ES3 ES3ES3 ES3 ES3ES3ES3ES3ES3 ES3 ES3 EW2 EW2 EW2EW2EW2EW2EW2 EW2EW2 EW2 EW2EW2 EW2 EW2 EW2 ER1 ER1 ER1 ER1 ER1ER1 ER1ER1 ES3 EW1EW1 ER1ER1 EW6 EW6EW6 EW6 EW3EW3EW3EW3EW3EW3EW3 EW3 EW3 EW3 20' AFF 20' AFF 20' AFF 75' AFF (DIRECTIONAL ART LIGHTING) ES1 83' AFF (DIRECTIONAL ART LIGHTING) ES1 Lighting Symbol Legend EW2 -SURFACE MOUNT DOWNLIGHT (14' AFF, TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) EW3 -WALL SCONCE (20' AFF, TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) ES1 -DIRECTIONAL (ART LIGHTING) ER1 -RECESSED DOWNLIGHT MOUNTED IN SOFFIT ABOVE AS NOTED EW6 -WALL SCONCE (10' ABOVE ESCALATOR) EW1 -WALL SCONCE (20' AFF, TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) ES3 -WALLWASH (14' AFF, TYP) EW5 -WALL SCONCE (9' AFF, TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) EG1, EG1A, EG1B -POLE BEAM (HEIGHT VARIES) EG2 -BOLLARD (3' ABOVE SURFACE) ES3 -LINEAR FESTOON LIGHTING (SEASONAL 16' SURFACE) EL2 -ROPE LIGHTING (AT FIREPIT) 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 :0 1 :0 3 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 0 1 : 0 3 P M 24900.00 AL-03 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 LIGHTING PLAN - LEVEL P2 - PASEO 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 1/8" = 1'-0"B1 LEVEL P2 - OVERALL LIGHTING PLAN - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 174 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 A1 A-18 A1 A-18 D5 A-19 D5 A-19A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 20'-6" AFF 20'-6" AFF 20'-6" AFF 20'-6" AFF 24' AFF 24' AFF 24' AFF 24' AFF EW3 23' AFF (IN SOFFIT) 13' AFF (IN SOFFIT)13' AFF (IN SOFFIT) 17' AFF (IN SOFFIT) 12' AFF (IN SOFFIT) STAIR STAIR LOBBY UNIT A UNIT B UNIT B EHU | UNIT CEHU | UNIT C UNIT M UNIT P LOBBY UNIT D STAIR ELEVATOR STAIR PUBLIC ELEVATOR ELEVATOR STAIR ELEVATOR STAIR OWNER'S LOUNGE / AMENITY EW6 EW6EW6 EW6 EW6 EW6EW6 EW6 EW6 EW6 EW6 EW6 ER1ER1 ER1 ER1 ER1ER1ER1 EW1 EW1 ER1 ER1 ER1 EW3EW3EW3 EW2EW2 EW3 EW3 EW3 EW3 ES1 ES1 56' AFF (DIRECTIONAL ART LIGHTING) 46' AFF (DIRECTIONAL ART LIGHTING) EW5 EW5 EW5 EW5 Lighting Symbol Legend EW2 -SURFACE MOUNT DOWNLIGHT (14' AFF, TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) EW3 -WALL SCONCE (20' AFF, TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) ES1 -DIRECTIONAL (ART LIGHTING) ER1 -RECESSED DOWNLIGHT MOUNTED IN SOFFIT ABOVE AS NOTED EW6 -WALL SCONCE (10' ABOVE ESCALATOR) EW1 -WALL SCONCE (20' AFF, TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) ES3 -WALLWASH (14' AFF, TYP) EW5 -WALL SCONCE (9' AFF, TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) EG1, EG1A, EG1B -POLE BEAM (HEIGHT VARIES) EG2 -BOLLARD (3' ABOVE SURFACE) ES3 -LINEAR FESTOON LIGHTING (SEASONAL 16' SURFACE) EL2 -ROPE LIGHTING (AT FIREPIT) 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 P R O G R E S S P R IN T S N O T F O R C O NS T R U C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 :0 1 :0 8 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 0 1 : 0 8 P M 24900.00 AL-05 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 LIGHTING PLAN - LEVEL ONE - PLAZA 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 LEVEL 1 - OVERALL LIGHTING PLAN - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 175 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PRO G RESS PRIN TS NO T FO R CO NS TRU CTIO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 4 /1 2 /2 0 2 4 1 1 :4 9 :2 0 A M 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 1 1 : 4 9 : 2 0 A M 24900.00 AL-16 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 LIGHTING CUTSHEETS 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. Tex Jr-60 in Enviro Oil-Rubbed Bronze (EOB) Tex Jr-60 in Enviro Oil-Rubbed Bronze (EOB) TEX JR APPLICATIONS Direct/Indirect grazing luminaire for exterior/interior use: flanking doors, on columns, on building facades, between windows, corridors, and elevator lobbies SIZES • 30” H x 9” W x 4”D, 18 lbs • 60” H x 9” W x 4”D, 36 lbs MOUNTING • J-Box 3.0 or 4.0 at center or end of fixture • Steel mounting system with mounting plate and cover with rubber gaskets between the junction box and mounting plate • Can be mounted vertically or horizontally SPECIFICATIONS • High efficiency, fully integrated propietary LED module • IP66 Rated • 120-277V input • 100,000+ hours rated life time • 10 Year Limited Warranty (excludes shade) • Title 24 Compliant • ADA Compliant LAMPING • 3000K, 3500K • 30” - 760 delivered lumens • 60” - 1221 delivered lumens • 0-10V Dimming (100-10%) CONSTRUCTION Fixture shell (shade): Heavy gauge aluminum with industrial powder coat finish and high impact acrylic 10YR ARCHITECTURAL SCALE, WET-LISTED EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE ALVALIGHT.COM P: 510 993 0898 SPECIFICATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE EVO4WC page 1 of 9 Luminaire Type: Catalog Number: Multiple Layers of Light General Illumination Wall Mount Cylinder 4" GOTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DOWNLIGHTING | 1400 Lester Road Conyers, GA 30012 | P 800-705-SERV (7378) | gothamlighting.com © 2014-2023 Acuity Brands Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved. Rev. 05/03/23 Specifications subject to change without notice. The product images shown are for illustration purposes only and may not be an exact representation of the product. OV E R V I E W CO M P L E M E N T A R Y P R O D U C T S • Batwing distribution with feathered edges provides even illumination on horizontal and vertical surfaces • Bounding Ray™ optical design • 45° cutoff to source and source image • Fully serviceable lensed LED light engine • 70% lumen maintenance at 60,000 hours • 2.5 SDCM; 85 CRI typical, 90+ CRI optional • Fixtures are damp location standard; wet location option (WL), covered ceiling, IP66 option available, covered ceiling not required. • 20 standard colors in textured and gloss finish; custom or RAL colors also available • Field configurable surface junction box conduit covers available • ENERGY STAR® Certified product • UGR of zero for fixtures aimed at nadir with a cut-off equal to or less than 60deg per CIE 117-1995 Discomfort Glare in Interior Lighting. UGR FAQ (UGR FAQ) Feature Set Distribution Superior Perfomance wide 1.2 S:MH medium 0.8 S:MH medium wide 1.0 S:MH Nominal Lumens 250 500 750 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Delivered Lumens 271 573 808 1001 1527 1994 2580 3110 3612 4120 4584 5045 Wattage 3.1 7.2 7.9 8.8 13.7 19.5 25.7 31.2 38.4 35.4 40.1 44.7 Lumens per Watt 87.4 79.6 102.3 113.8 111.5 102.3 100.4 99.7 94.1 116 114 113 Coordinated Apertures | Multiple Layers of Light EVO + Incito — Multiple Layers of LightGeneral Illumination Layer | EVO High Center Beam Layer | Incito Downlight Adjustable Open Wallwash Lensed Wallwash Cylinder Pinhole Bevel Hyperbolic MRI Surgical Suite Patient Room Dynamic Food Service Vandal/Tamper Clean Room Shower Steam Room Core Healthcare Special Applications ICO4UDWC page 1 of 9 Luminaire Type: Catalog Number: High Center Beam Wall Mount Direct/Indirect Cylinder 4" Multiple Layers of Light incito™ GOTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DOWNLIGHTING | 1400 Lester Road Conyers, GA 30012 | P 800-705-SERV (7378) | gothamlighting.com © 2021-2023 Acuity Brands Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved. Rev. 09/20/23 Specifications subject to change without notice. The product images shown are for illustration purposes only and may not be an exact representation of the product. OV E R V I E W CO M P L E M E N T A R Y P R O D U C T S • Downlight and uplight can be individually specified for lumen output, beam spreads and accessories, allowing for a complete custom design • Accessories available in vivid colors to give designers the freedom to create unique luminaires • 12 optimized distribution patterns allow designers to achieve unique specifications for their projects • Bounding Ray™ delivers top down flash for superior glare control • 45° cutoff to source and source image • Fully serviceable lensed LED light engine • 70% lumen maintenance at 60,000 hours • 2.5 MacAdam Ellipse; 85 CRI typical, 90+ CRI optional • Fixtures are damp location standard; wet location (WL) and IP66 options available - covered ceiling not required. • 20 standard cylinder colors in textured and gloss finish; custom or RAL colors also available • ENERGY STAR® Certified product • UGR of zero for fixtures aimed at nadir with a cut-off equal to or less than 60deg per CIE 117-1995 Discomfort Glare in Interior Lighting. UGR FAQ Feature Set Distribution Superior Perfomance 65° beam angle 60° beam angle 50° beam angle 45° beam angle 40° beam angle 35° beam angle 30° beam angle 25° beam angle 20° beam angle 15° beam angle 10° beam angle Nominal Lumens per Direction 500 750 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Delivered Lumens 703 807 1062 1545 1977 2419 2920 3548 3982 4419 4848 Wattage 6.7 7.5 9.8 15.1 21.5 26.5 34.1 33.8 39.5 46.2 53.2 Efficacy 104 108 108 102 92 91 86 105 101 96 91 *Based on 3500K AR LSS 35D 80CRI down orientation only Coordinated Apertures | Multiple Layers of Light EVO + Incito — Multiple Layers of LightGeneral Illumination Layer | EVO High Center Beam Layer | Incito Downlight Adjustable Open Wallwash Lensed Wallwash Cylinder Pinhole Bevel Hyperbolic MRI Surgical Suite Patient Room Dynamic Food Service Vandal/Tamper Clean Room Shower Steam Room Core Healthcare Special Applications ASYM No accessory Snoot Angle Cut Snoot Light Shield Concentric Ring Louver ICO4WC page 1 of 9 Luminaire Type: Catalog Number: High Center Beam Wall Mount Cylinder 4" Multiple Layers of Light incito™ GOTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DOWNLIGHTING | 1400 Lester Road Conyers, GA 30012 | P 800-705-SERV (7378) | gothamlighting.com © 2014-2023 Acuity Brands Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved. Rev. 07/06/23 Specifications subject to change without notice. The product images shown are for illustration purposes only and may not be an exact representation of the product. OV E R V I E W CO M P L E M E N T A R Y P R O D U C T S • Eleven optimized distribution patterns allow designers to achieve tailored objectives • Bounding Ray™ optical design • 45° cutoff to source and source image • Fully serviceable lensed LED light engine • 70% lumen maintenance at 60,000 hours • 2.5 SDCM; 85 CRI typical, 90+ CRI optional • Fixtures are damp location standard; wet location option (WL), covered ceiling, IP66 option available, covered ceiling not required. • 20 standard colors in textured and gloss finish; custom or RAL colors also available) • Field configurable surface junction box conduit covers available • ENERGY STAR® Certified product • UGR of zero for fixtures aimed at nadir with a cut-off equal to or less than 60deg per CIE 117-1995 Discomfort Glare in Interior Lighting. UGR FAQ (UGR FAQ) Feature Set Distribution Superior Perfomance 65° beam angle 60° beam angle 50° beam angle 45° beam angle 40° beam angle 35° beam angle 30° beam angle 25° beam angle 20° beam angle 15° beam angle 10° beam angle Nominal Lumens 500 750 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Delivered 703 807 1062 1545 1977 2419 2920 3548 3982 4419 4848 Wattage 6.7 7.5 9.8 15.1 21.5 26.5 34.1 33.8 39.5 46.2 53.2 Efficacy 104 108 108 102 92 91 86 105 101 96 91 Coordinated Apertures | Multiple Layers of Light EVO + Incito — Multiple Layers of LightGeneral Illumination Layer | EVO High Center Beam Layer | Incito Downlight Adjustable Open Wallwash Lensed Wallwash Cylinder Pinhole Bevel Hyperbolic MRI Surgical Suite Patient Room Dynamic Food Service Vandal/Tamper Clean Room Shower Steam Room Core Healthcare Special Applications Updated 1.2024 1 410 381 1497 inter-lux.com answers@inter-lux.com Inter-lux reserves the right to make technical changes without notice. Periskop 3.0" Optics 3.0" (6.5W) Fixed 3.0" (8W) Narrow General: The Periskop outdoor family of flood lights represents a versatile landscaping solution for trees, bushes, sculptures, as well as building facades. Periskop is available in multiple sizes and optics (including a Narrow Spot beam for dramatic effects), with multiple installation solutions available and a selection of accessories to control and shape the beam to your desire. Fixture Body: Open-pore Anodized and Powder Coated Die-Cast Aluminum. Glass: Extra-clear Tempered glass. Bracket: Powder Coated Steel Bracket, Black Painted. Bracket pivots -10°/+60° on the vertical plane and swivels +/-38° on the horizontal plane. Mounting details: Fixture can be installed straight into concrete or onto different surfaces by using one of the several mounting accessories available within the family. Dimensions/Weight: 3.0" (1.80 lbs) Driver: Remote, 120-277V Dimmable 0-10V. Optional: Lutron Athena Wireless Node RF (AWNRF), can be added to control up to 5x drivers together (Consult Factory). Wattage: 8W (3.0") Cable: Fixture comes with 3.28' of power cable and it's equipped with TCS safety system to shield circuits from moisture. IP rating: IP66 for protection against dust and water jets from any angle. IK rating: IK 09 (3.0") ETL Certification: ETL, wet location Optics: Fixed. Available in Narrow Spot – Spot – Flood – Wide Flood. Standard Visors and Snoots accessories available. Honeycomb louvers and Elliptic lenses available upon request. Color temperatures: 2700K – 3000K – 4000K. CRI: 80+ Lumen Maintenance: L70 projections tested at Tj 65° C and Ta 25°. Warranty: 5-year Limited Warranty on fixtures. 1-year Limited Warranty on Remote Drivers. Delivered Lumens*3.0" / 6.5W 3.0" / 8W NSP N/A 588 SP 626 N/A FL 598 N/A WFL 561 N/A *Values shown for 3000K Ordering Information PER Product Trim/Finish Type Size Wattage/Operation Color Temp Optic +Accessories3 Driver (Required)3 PER = Periskop SWH = Square White SBL = Square Black SGR = Square Gray SDB = Square Dark Brown F = Fixed 30 = 3.0" 6.5 CC = 6.5W / Constant Current (700mA)1 27 = 2700K 30 = 3000K 40 = 4000K SP = Spot1 FL = Flood1 WFL = Wide Flood1 Peg E98549 Tree belt E99802 Anti-glare E98966 E989694 ECO30W-700 SOLO50W-700 SOLO100W-700 AWNRF (option)5 N = Narrow beam 30 = 3.0" 8 CC = 8W / Constant Current (700mA)2 27 = 2700K 30 = 3000K 40 = 4000K NSP = Narrow Spot2 1 Available with F ONLY 2 Available with N ONLY 3 See page 2 4 Available with F ONLY 5 Example: ECO30W-700-AWNRE IP66 SWHSBLSGRSDB F - 30 - 6.5 - CCN - 30 - 8 - CC SPFLWFLNSP EC030WSOLO50WSOLO100WECO30W-AWNRESOLO50W-AWNRESOLO100W-AWNRE E98549E99802E98966E98969 273040 EVO2 page 1 of 7 Luminaire Type: Catalog Number: General Illumination Round Downlight 2" GOTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DOWNLIGHTING | 1400 Lester Road Conyers, GA 30012 | P 800-705-SERV (7378) | gothamlighting.com © 2014-2023 Acuity Brands Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved. Rev. 10/24/23 Specifications subject to change without notice. The product images shown are for illustration purposes only and may not be an exact representation of the product. Multiple Layers of Light OV E R V I E W CO M P L I M E N T A R Y P R O D U C T S • Batwing distribution with feathered edges provides even illumination on horizontal and vertical surfaces • Bounding Ray™ optical design • 50° Cutoff to source and source image • Field interchangeable optic • Fully serviceable and upgradeable lensed LED light engine • 70% lumen maintenance at 60,000 hours • 2.5 SDCM; 85 CRI typical, 90+ CRI optional • Fixtures are wet location, covered ceiling • ENERGY STAR® Certified product Feature Set Distribution Superior Performance Nominal lumens 250 500 750 1000 1500 2000 Delivered 265 540 802 1073 1537 2094 Wattage 3.4 6.3 9.7 12.7 21.2 31.7 Efficacy 78 85 83 84 73 66 *Based on 3500K 80CRI 15D AR LSS wide 1.2 S:MH medium 0.9 S:MH medium wide 1.0 S:MH Coordinated Apertures | Multiple Layers of Light EVO + Incito — Multiple Layers of LightGeneral Illumination Layer | EVO High Center Beam Layer | Incito Downlight Adjustable Open Wallwash Lensed Wallwash Cylinder Pinhole Bevel Hyperbolic MRI Surgical Suite Patient Room Dynamic Food Service Vandal/Tamper Clean Room Shower Steam Room Core Healthcare Special Applications Items marked by a shaded background qualify for the Design Select program and ship in 15 days or less. To learn more about Design Select, visit www.acuitybrands.com/designselect. *See ordering tree for details OVERVIEW • SPECIFICATIONS • ORDERING INTERIOR + EXTERIOR | F170 SINGLE DATE PROJECT FIRM TYPE RISE™ 1 /4ECOSENSELIGHTING.COM P • 310.496.6255 F • 310.496.6256 T • 855.632.6736 855.6.ECOSEN ECOSENSE LIGHTING INC. 837 NORTH SPRING STREET SUITE 103 LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 SPECIFICATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. VISIT ECOSENSELIGHTING.COM FOR THE MOST CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS. FOR A LIST OF PATENTS VISIT ECOSENSELIGHTING.COM/IP-PORTFOLIO/ ©2019 ECOSENSE LIGHTING INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ECOSENSE, THE ECOSENSE LOGO, TRoV, TROV AND ECOSPEC ARE REGISTERED TRADEMARKS OF ECOSENSE LIGHTING INC. RISE™, SLIM COVE™, FREEDOM TO CREATE™, MACRO™, FLIP-TO-FLAT™ ARE TRADEMARKS OF ECOSENSE LIGHTING INC. 20231212 RISE IS A SYSTEM OF BEAUTIFULLY DESIGNED OUTDOOR RATED LUMINAIRES THAT PROVIDE EFFICIENT AND POWERFUL LIGHT USING THE LATEST IN LED TECHNOLOGY. RISE F170 SINGLE IS A POWERFUL AND COMPACT LED LIGHT FIXTURE, DELIVERING UP TO 4450 LUMENS, THAT CAN BE USED IN SPOT, ACCENT, LANDSCAPE AND FLOODLIGHT APPLICATIONS. ITS UNIQUE MACRO™ LOCK FEATURE ALLOWS FOR FULL 180 DEGREE TILT AND 360 DEGREE PAN AIMABILITY USING ONLY ONE TOOL. FEATURES : • POWERFUL CBCP • EXTREMELY COMPACT • POWERFUL OUTPUT UP TO 4450 LUMENS • MACRO™ LOCK - 180° TILT AND 360° PAN • 12 UNIQUE BEAM ANGLES • MULTIVOLT (110 V-277 V) • 8 CCTS: 2200K THROUGH 6500K • 80+ AND 90+ CRI • DIMMABLE TO 5% • IP66 RATED EXAMPLE: F170-1S-LO-22-8-05-S-X-A COLOR RENDERING INDEX 80+, 90+ COLOR CONSISTENCY 3-STEP MACADAM ELLIPSE ALL LUMEN DATA IS FROM 4000K 80CRI FIXTURES. PLEASE SEE PHOTOMETRY SPEC SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL LUMEN DATA. * ENERGY STAR REPORTED TESTING HOURS TO DATE. CALCULATIONS FOR LED FIXTURES ARE BASED ON MEASUREMENTS THAT COMPLY WITH IES LM-80 TESTING PROCEDURES AND IES TM-21 CALCULATOR ** ESTIMATED HOURS ACCESSORIESBEAM ANGLECRI CCT/ COLOR POWER/ LUMEN OUTPUT* FIXTURE CONFIG. FIXTURE MODEL FINISHES WIRING AND MOUNTING 05 - Laser Spot (5°) 10 - Very Narrow Spot (10°) 15 - Narrow Spot (15°) 20 - Spot (20°) 40 - Flood (40°) 60 - Medium Flood (60°) 70 - Wide Flood (70°) 90 - Very Wide Flood (90°) E1 - Elliptical 1 (15°x60°) E2 - Elliptical 2 (30°x60°) E3 - Elliptical 3 (60°x15°) E4 - Elliptical 4 (60°x30°) 22 - 2200K 25 - 2500K 27 - 2700K 30 - 3000K 35 - 3500K 40 - 4000K 50 - 5000K 65 - 6500K RD - Red GR - Green BL - Blue AM - Amber *2200K and 2500K not available in 40°, 60°, 70° and 90° F170 1S - Single Head LUMEN DEPRECIATION WATTS L70 @ 25C L70 @ 50C L90 @ 25C L90 @ 50C NOTE: Information on this Spec Sheet is subject to change, please visit ecosenselighting.com/downloads/rise for the most updated information. 8 - 80 9 - 90* X - For RD, GR, BL, AM *90 CRI not available in 2200K, 2500K, 5000K, and 6500K LO - Low Output MO - Medium Output HO - High Output A - 19” Flying Leads - Internal Cable IC; Bottom Exit; 1/2” NPT ; UL Listed B* - 10’ External Cable Side Exit; Surface Mount ; UL Listed C* - 10’ External Cable Bottom Exit; Surface Mount - 1/2” NPT ; UL Listed D* - 10’ External Cable Side Exit; Surface Mount ; CE Listed E* - 10’ External Cable Bottom Exit; Surface Mount - 1/2” NPT; CE Listed K - Black Z - Bronze S - Silver W - White C - Custom* *Provide RAL # X - No Accessory H - Half Snoot F - Full Snoot LOW MEDIUM HIGH >60,500* >(109,000)** >60,500* >(109,000)** >60,500* >(181,000)** >60,500* >(109,000)** >60,500* >(109,000)** >36,300* >60,500* >(109,000)** >60,500* >(109,000)** >60,500* >(69,800)** >60,500* >(109,000)** >60,500* >(109,000)** >33,200* PERFORMANCE 13 Low Output 1,258 97 72,487 25 Medium Output 2,131 85 122,841 38 High Output 2,878 76 165,891 WATTS POWER LUMEN OUTPUT EFFICACY CBCP 5° 40° 5° 40°5° *SEE PHOTOMETARY CHART FOR LUMEN DATA 1,633 2,955 4,350 126 118 114 40° 2,861 5,177 7,621 2225273035405065RDGRBLAMLOMOHO F170 1S 89X 0510152040607090E1E2E3E4 KZSWC XHF ABCDE EVO2SC page 1 of 8 Luminaire Type: Catalog Number: General Illumination Surface Ceiling Cylinder 2" GOTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DOWNLIGHTING | 1400 Lester Road Conyers, GA 30012 | P 800-705-SERV (7378) | gothamlighting.com © 2014-2022 Acuity Brands Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved. Rev. 09/08/22 Specifications subject to change without notice. The product images shown are for illustration purposes only and may not be an exact representation of the product. Multiple Layers of Light OV E R V I E W CO M P L E M E N T A R Y P R O D U C T S • Batwing distribution with feathered edges provides even illumination on horizontal and vertical surfaces • Bounding Ray™ optical design • 50° Cutoff to source and source image • Field interchangeable optic • Driver and LED light engine fully serviceable from below ceiling • 70% lumen maintenance at 60,000 hours • 2.5 SDCM; 85 CRI typical, 90+ CRI optional • Fixtures are wet location, covered ceiling (WL option) • ENERGY STAR® Certified product • 20 standard colors in textured and gloss finish; custom or RAL colors also available Feature Set Superior Performance Nominal lumens 250 500 750 1000 1500 2000 Delivered 265 540 802 1073 1537 2094 Wattage 3.4 6.3 9.7 12.7 21.2 31.7 Efficacy 78 85 83 84 73 66 *Based on 3500K 80CRI MWD AR LSS Coordinated Apertures | Multiple Layers of Light EVO + Incito — Multiple Layers of LightGeneral Illumination Layer | EVO High Center Beam Layer | Incito Downlight Adjustable Open Wallwash Lensed Wallwash Cylinder Pinhole Bevel Hyperbolic MRI Surgical Suite Patient Room Dynamic Food Service Vandal/Tamper Clean Room Shower Steam Room Core Healthcare Special Applications Distribution wide 1.2 S:MH narrow 0.8 S:MH medium wide 1.0 S:MH Updated 10.2023 1 410 381 1497 inter-lux.com answers@inter-lux.com Inter-lux reserves the right to make technical changes without notice. Periskop 1.8" Optics 1.8" (6W) Fixed 1.8" (6W) Narrow w/Integrated Snoot General: The Periskop outdoor family of flood lights represents a versatile landscaping solution for trees, bushes, sculptures, as well as building facades. Periskop is available in multiple sizes and optics (including a Narrow Spot beam for dramatic effects), with multiple installation solutions available and a selection of accessories to control and shape the beam to your desire. Fixture Body: Open-pore Anodized and Powder Coated Die-Cast Aluminum. Glass: Extra-clear Tempered glass. Bracket: Anodized Aluminum Bracket, Black Painted. Bracket pivots -14°/+110° on the vertical plane (no horizontal plane adjustment). Mounting details: Fixture can be installed straight into concrete or onto different surfaces by using one of the several mounting accessories available within the family. Dimensions/Weight: 1.8" (0.44 lbs) Driver: Remote, 120-277V Dimmable 0-10V. Optional: Lutron Athena Wireless Node RF (AWNRF), can be added to control up to 5x drivers together (Consult Factory). Wattage: 6W (1.8") Cable: Fixture comes with 3.28' of power cable and it's equipped with TCS safety system to shield circuits from moisture. IP rating: IP66 for protection against dust and water jets from any angle. IK rating: IK 05 (1.8") ETL Certification: ETL, wet location Optics: Fixed. Available in Narrow Spot – Spot – Flood – Wide Flood. Visors and Snoots accessories available. Honeycomb louvers and Elliptic lenses available upon request. Color temperatures: 2700K – 3000K – 4000K. CRI: 80+ Lumen Maintenance: L70 projections tested at Tj 65° C and Ta 25°. Warranty: 5-year Limited Warranty on fixtures. 1-year Limited Warranty on Remote Drivers. Delivered Lumens*1.8" NSP 488 SP 485 FL 397 WFL 454 *Values shown for 3000K Ordering Information PER 18 6 - CC Product Trim/Finish Type Size Wattage/Operation Color Temp Optic +Accessories3 Driver (Required)3 PER = Periskop SWH = Square White SBL = Square Black SGR = Square Gray SDB = Square Dark Brown F = Fixed NS = Narrow w/Integrated Snoot1 18 = 1.8" 6 CC = 6W / Constant Current (500mA) 27 = 2700K 30 = 3000K 40 = 4000K NSP = Narrow Spot2 SP = Spot FL = Flood WFL = Wide Flood Peg E98624 E98550 Tree belt E99802 ECO30W-500 SOLO50W-500 SOLO100W-500 AWNRF (option)4 1 Available with NSP ONLY 2 Available with NS ONLY 3 See page 2 4 Example: ECO30W-500-AWNRE IP66 SWHSBLSGRSDB 273040 NSPSPFLWFL EC030WSOLO50WSOLO100WECO30W-AWNRESOLO50W-AWNRESOLO100W-AWNRE E98624E98550E99802 FNS FIXTURE TYPE: PROJECT NAME: Beam 12' - 30' Steel Pole with Wood Accents SPECIFICATIONS: CONSTRUCTION: Formed A992 steel beam welded to an A572 steel baseplate. Solid wood panel is assembled through glulam construction and precision machined using CNC technology. Adhesive complies with ASTM D-2559 glulam construction specifications for extreme exposed weather conditions, is waterproof and rated for wet or dry use exposure. ELECTRICAL: A 5/16” – 18 grounding point is provided on the aluminum pole center support. Wireway access is provided through a NEC compliant handhole hidden behind accent panel. FINISHES AND MATERIALS: All metal parts are polyester powder coat painted. Wood panels are finished with a low VOC waterborne matte exterior finish containing UV and mildew inhibitors. Care and Maintenance HARDWARE: All fasteners and hardware are stainless steel. Anchor bolt kits are ASTM F1554 grade 55 steel with galvanized steel hex nuts and washers. FIXTURE MOUNTING: Fixtures mount to pole from bolt pattern, horizontal mast arm, or custom arm. Steel H-beam upright with wood accent panels. FEATURES: • Roadway or pedestrian pole heights up to 30' • Catenary cable capabilities • Available in 6", 8", and 10" square sizes Shown with Plaza arm, banner arm option, and modified top. Shown with custom arm. 44 ©2024 STRUCTURA, INC. FIXTURE TYPE: PROJECT NAME: Lineal Bollard Illuminated Aluminum Bollard High performance slender aluminum bollard with accent panel and configuration options. FEATURES: • Small 4" x 3" footprint • Available with wood or aluminum front accent panel • Multiple distribution options • Concealed mounting hardware SPECIFICATIONS: CONSTRUCTION: Seamless aluminum housing comprised of 6005A- T61 extrusion and 6061-T6 end plates. Secures to an A36 steel base weldment. Gasketed handhole access behind accent panel. ELECTRICAL: Powered by a Class P 120-277VAC primary integral power supply behind gasketed handhole cover behind accent panel. System is 0-10V dimmable. Minimum -40°C operating temperature. OPTICAL SYSTEM: LED boards have solderless connections for field upgradability. Available in 2700K, 3000K, 3500k and 4000K color temperatures with >90 CRI. Optics are UV resistant molded PMMA in Type II and V distributions. Consult factory for additional lumen output, CCT, and optical distribution options. FINISHES AND MATERIALS: All exterior aluminum parts are polyester powder coat painted to AAMA-2604 standards. Wood pieces are finished with a low VOC waterborne matte exterior finish containing UV and mildew inhibitors. Care and Maintenance HARDWARE: All luminaire hardware is stainless steel. Anchor bolt kit is hot dipped galvanized. LISTINGS & RATINGS: Luminaire CSA listed according to CSA C22.2 No. 250.0-18/UL Standard 1598. Suitable for wet locations. LM-80 test reported L70 > 60,500 hours and calculated L70 > 154,000 hours. 84 ©2022 STRUCTURA, INC. FIXTURE TYPE: PROJECT NAME: Aura Illuminated Wooden Linear Pendant SPECIFICATIONS: HOUSING: Solid Accoya wood linear assembled through glulam construction and precision machined using CNC technology. Adhesive complies with ASTM D-2559 glulam construction specifications for extreme exposed weather conditions, waterproof, and rated for wet or dry use exposure. ELECTRICAL: Powered by a standalone Q-Tran QZ, 120-277VAC primary/24VDC secondary outdoor rated remote dimmable power supply. Power supply features built-in short circuit protection, over load protection, and over temperature protection. System is forward phase, reverse phase, and 1-10V dimming. Consult factory for other driver options. Catenary mounted fixtures supplied with 1' infeed cable; a 40' leader cable supplied with infeed only fixtures. Ceiling canopy mounted fixtures supplied with 6' infeed cable. Operating temperature of -4°F to 125°F SO, 115°F MO, and 108°F HO. OPTICAL SYSTEM: Available in 2700K, 3000K, 3500K, 4000K color temperatures with smooth, dot free illumination. Consult factory for other lumen outputs. FINISHES AND MATERIALS: Wood is finished with a low VOC waterborne matte exterior finish containing UV and mildew inhibitors. Care and Maintenance HARDWARE: All fasteners and non-wood components are stainless steel unless otherwise noted. LISTINGS & RATINGS: Luminaire CSA listed according to CSA C22.2 No. 250.0-18/UL Standard 1598 and UL Standard 2108. Suitable for wet locations. LM-80 test calculated L70 > 40,000 hours. Luminaire not to be installed in chlorinated environment. WARRANTY: 25-year wood warranty with a 2-year finish warranty. 3-year warranty on LED and driver. Solid wood exterior/interior LED round pendant. FEATURES: • Available in 2' to 12' lengths • >90CRI smooth, dot free illumination • Dimmable outdoor rated power supply and IP67 luminaire • Catenary cable, ceiling, and wall mounting options 122 ©2023 STRUCTURA, INC. www.LEDI.LIGHTING | Quotations: designs@ledinspirations.com | Phone: (832) 717-2710 Inspire Neon Flex 0404 Side Bend 24V DC LED Neon Flex Type QTY Part Number Signature Copyright © LED Inspirations, LLC | Version 12072023 | 1 Specifications Power 3 Watts/FT Max Run Length 16FT Cut Length Every 3.94” Available Colors 2700K, 3000K, 3500K, 4000K, Red, Green, and Blue Input Voltage 24V DC Bend Type Side Bend (bends side-to-side) Product Material UV-Resistant Silicone Product Color White Minimum Bend Diameter 3-7/8" Beam Angle 120° Lamp Life 50,000 Hours Max Ambient Temperature -13°F to 131°F (-25°C to 55°C) Max Operating Temperature 32°F to 131°F (0°C to 55°C) Environment IP67 Indoor or Outdoor Dimming 0-10V, MLV, ELV, Incandescent, and CFL/LED Connector Pre-Assembled Connectors or In-Field Connectors Certifications & Safety Standards • UL Listed for The United States and Canada - File # E467147 • UL Listed per UL2108 Low Voltage Lighting Systems/CSA C22.2 No 250.0-08-Luminaires/ UL8750 • Title 24 JA8 Compliant • Always review all local and national safety standards before installing any LEDI product(s). Side Bend (bends side-to-side) 3/8” 3/8” Color Lumens/FT Efficacy CRI 2700K 180 60 lm/W 90 3000K 192 64 lm/W 90 3500K 201 67 lm/W 90 4000K 204 68 lm/W 90 Red 84 28 lm/W n/a Green 262 87 lm/W n/a Blue 46 15 lm/W n/a Performance EW1 EW2 EW4 EW5EW3 ES3EW6ES1ES2ER1 EG1, EG1A, EG1B EG2 EL2EL1 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 March 11th PEC Results McBride absent 3.1: Work session - Cornerstone Pratt recused. Planner Spence gives an introduction. Staff does not perform any review as this is a work session. The applicant team gives a presentation. They talk about the regulatory context and development history on the site. They discuss the parking, easements on site, circulation on proposed site, uses on proposed, building height, and public benefit. The applicants and PEC discuss the SDD considerations on the site. Commission discusses building height for proposed, as well as EHU requirements, site planning, interior circulation, snow storage, and vehicle drop-off. Rediker asks for public comment there is none. Commissioner's comment Hagedorn appreciates articulation. Like the pathways, delineated drop-off area from the roundabout. Concerns -96 ft height is a big ask, particular concern to this commission. Like the increase in EHU bed count, dormitory housing is far less valuable since you can't put families in there, it should also help maintain community, live where you work. Jensen the east building feels like a great fit, the west building is a struggle with the height. That lift doesn’t currently have the volume of others. Commend you for trying to complete this area, a potential destination. Lipnick shares the concern on the massing and height at back of the building. Should have smaller building for the westside. Dormitory EHUs are a concern, doesn’t work for families and year-round employees. Wants to better understand the parking. Smith says its an amazing opportunity to reinvigorate this area. Hopefully this can bring back to life some of the public benefit in this area. Concerned about any relief from the minimum requirement for employee housing – the dormitory is a big ask. Use the parking to bring the public into this area. It will be interesting to hear the history. Learn more about the short-term rental program, occupancy rate, how it fits into commercial linkage. Rediker says overall its exciting that something is being done here. There’s some public benefit here, lift access, paseo, activating this space would be great. Primary concern is building height on the west side, sun/shade analysis, snow storage, parking (tandem), on site parking for retail/skiing. 190 PEC June 10, 2024 Time Stamp 0.00.28 Cornerstone Development PEC24-0016 Planner Spence gives an introduction. He gives a history of the Cornerstone Property. He walks through the history of the previous approvals. He talks about the public benefit for the 2024 proposal. He talks about proposed uses on the site. Rediker and Spence discuss the previous approvals, which did not move forward. Rediker asks about the improvements to the frontage road. Town Engineer Tom Kassmel walks through the Right-of-way work in this area. Kassmel walks through the traffic flow in the area. Lipnick asks about the turn from the Frontage Road in that area. Jensen asks about traffic backups in that area. Smith asks how far away are we from them having to add the turn lane back in? Kassmel says that’s a good question that should be studied further. Smith asks about the new development on Greenhill Court. Kassmel confirms that doesn’t connect with Westhaven via the road. Smith asks about the tennis courts in the area. Kassmel says if that site redeveloped it might get new access off the frontage road. It currently does not access from Westhaven. Smith asks about level of service, Kassmel says its likely wouldn’t change that level. Lipnick says part of the project is being a third portal for Vail Mountain, it could potentially bring a lot more skiers. Also a lot of events happen at the Grand Hyatt, would favor shortened right turn instead of doing away with it. Rediker asks about the parking information. Spence says there is a slight surplus in the Arias garage that could accommodate the increased commercial parking. Rediker asks how that works since it is a private garage. Spence says the excess capacity is total spaces minus current uses. There is data from 2016 showing the 38 space surplus. The current uses are largely the hotel, some for the CMC building, and the Cascade Residences. Rediker asks how the current garage works for public parking. Spence says that is best answered by the property owner. Lipnick asks how Cornerstone fits the land use. Spence says it includes resort style multifamily, the proposed uses are consistent. Hagedorn asks about commercial linkage; are the dorm style EHUs allowed? 191 Spence says it’s allowed with approval from PEC and Council. Smith says this SDD seems like somewhat of a regulatory nightmare, it’s not consistent with other areas. Does the Town or anyone else have an appetite for changing how this area is regulated? Rediker wants to stay on this project, that can be further addressed at commissioner comment. Spence says the SDD is set, we’re doing our best to understand the development standards as time go by. Agrees that it is messy but breaking it apart could create a new set of challenges. Alonso Ruiz de Velasco and Brendan Byrne with Davis Partnership Architects give a presentation for the applicants. Velasco says he knows Cascade has important potential, which is not fully harnessed today. They want to revitalize this area and create another hub. There are 30 residential units, a couple retail, it enhances the accessibility and connections in the area. Activation is an important goal, they’re trying to be compatible with surrounding properties. Gabby Voeller with SE Group gives a presentation on the parking requirements. Rediker asks if Vail Resorts is planning on expanding the ticket office in this location? Is there a contemplated ski patrol office there? Voeller says we’re not changing the function of the ticketing office, just slightly larger square footage for expanded restrooms. Velasco says there is potentially space in the area for ski patrol but it is not currently planned. Voeller talks about the current parking uses on site. Lipnick asks where increased skier parking would go? Voeller says they can come via transit, she didn’t see anywhere in code where it’s the developer’s responsibility to account for that. Rediker asks about the parking management plan for the dormitory. Voeller discusses how the proposed parking was arrived at. Jensen says he doesn’t see this as a portal, it is more a self-contained community. We have to be honest and say this is a fairly exclusive community for property owners, maybe don’t market it as a portal to the mountain. Joseph Lear with the applicant team talks about the commercial uses in the building, these square footages derived the parking requirements. Voeller says the final numbers are still being finalized. 192 Rediker asks if there is a front office on the upper floors. Lear says just a residence lounge. Rediker asks if this will be managed as a hotel, as many others in Town. Velasco says the current intent is residential units for sale. Rediker would like a better understanding of how the building is operated. Spence says Inclusionary Zoning is based on square footage only, doesn’t contemplate how the property is managed. Smith asks if there is a distinction for limited service lodges in commercial linkage. Spence says he will check on that. Smith says we’re allowing the parking requirement for private development to be satisfied by a third party. Is there a pitfall involved in that? We don’t have to solve for all the what ifs, but what responsibility does the Town have in that case? Velasco says there are two questions: does it comply with the code and who manages that parking? Right now we’re trying to make sure that we’re compliant with the code; there are existing spaces which could fulfill those needs. Smith asks about who owns the current parking in the garage. Rediker asks about potential parking agreements, Velasco says there will be a written agreement in place. Smith asks if there will be a rundown next meeting as to how the Town feels about the parking arrangement? Spence confirms. Voeller runs through proposed GRFA amendments to the SDD. Smith asks if SDD ordinances considered 250 additions over the years? Spence says likely not, they are allowed separate from the GRFA total – but are charged inclusionary zoning. Voeller talks about the Commercial Linkage numbers. Smith and Voeller discuss rounding the numbers. Spence says one employee would be satisfied by fee-in-lieu, per the applicant’s table. Smith asks about the fee-in-lieu, Spence says it could be possible to house them on site, it’s an option of the Town Council. Lear gives a presentation on the architecture and site planning for the building. There is a loading dock on the west side of the CMC building, which could service the Cornerstone building. PEC discusses the circulation of the deliveries in the area. Velasco says they don’t yet know who will own or operate the coffee shop. 193 Lear talks about the paseo area. He walks through the access and dropoff area at the front of the building. He walks through the various floor levels and elevations. He talks about the landscaping features south of the building. Tucker says the distance from the loading to the commercial spaces is a long way for the drop-offs. The service will not come down the paseo. Rediker asks about the access sidewalk on the west, is that on cornerstone property? Lear says it is split with the property to the west. The building setback is 8’ to the property line in that area. Rediker asks how tall the hotel is south of Cornerstone. Velasco says it is 5 stories in that area. Rediker asks about access to the on-site EHU units. He asks about the south property line. Lear says the building is 30 ft from the hotel, 15 feet to the property line on the southwest part of the lot. Lear walks through the floor plan of the on site EHUs. He says the pathways in that area will be heated. Rediker asks about the owner’s lounge. Lear says there is one at the drop-off level, and one at the paseo level that will have resident amenities. Hagedorn says that space is prominent on the façade, talks about uses on basement or garden level. Is that the right use for that area? Lear says they’re trying to put the active resident spaces in that area, so it’s activated. Rediker asks about the plans for the dorm style EHUs. Velasco walks through the floor plans for the dormitories. Rediker and applicants discuss access to dormitories and restrooms. Smith asks staff how these compare to others? Spence says there is one other example in the Four Seasons, with individual access to the outside. Hagedorn asks about enforceability of an offsite EHU like this. Spence says the deed restrictions can be required prior to completion of the main buildings. Smith asks about the occupancy requirements for this type of EHU. Spence says it could be a violation of the deed-restriction if it was not occupied, it’s an interesting question because of the challenges with occupancy. Lipnick has concerns with the proposed access and light. Velasco says they’re adapting an existing space for a better use. Lipnick doesn’t think year-round workers and families would tolerate that, maybe J-1 visas for three months. 194 Smith asks if there is already a building permit? Spence confirms there was a building permit but with a condition that the acceptance of the units for Cornerstone mitigation was to be determined by the PEC and the Town Council. Rediker asks about the sun-shade analysis. Lear walks through the greatest impacts, the dropoff area is snowmelted because of this. Rediker asks about the 2008 approval, where was the building envelope? Spence says the footprint was similar, the height was 71 feet from the lowest level. Smith asks about other properties within the ownership. Hagedorn asks about the vestibule in the paseo level. Lear says they are small day lockers. Velasco talks about the ownership situation for the parking. Lipnick asks if they thought about workforce housing for the tennis court area? Velasco says they have thought about it. Stan Beard lives in the neighborhood. He asks about the orientation of the dropoff level and the paseo. His concern is the outdoor entertainment areas, has concerns with noise as they face Gore Creek and Glen Lyon. He doesn’t believe past approvals should have anything to do with this one today. It should not exceed the height of the tallest existing building, what would support that? He believes the parking should be in house only, and let’s be clear this is not a hotel in disguise. He doesn’t believe we should make exceptions, doesn’t want to push the height limit even higher, our neighborhood doesn’t justify it. Rory Keller is the managing partner of Keller and Mendoza in the CMC building, which has 11 professional employees. Their HOA recently approved the dormitory. He was not too excited to have dormitory housing but understood the need, it’s what a good business neighbor should do.. One month later, they received an increase in parking prices, which are untenable for a business. If we are unable to get a reasonable parking option, we are likely to have to move to another location outside of Vail. They have also reserved two units in Timber Ridge. They request that Town look at what possible solutions may be available to a business. They are in favor of the proposal, but they are here to advocate that long term parking solutions be addressed as the development district is being amended. The question is whether they would commit to a percentage being allocated for long-term reasonable parking rates. Kim Seter, with Seter & Vander Wall, is representing Cascade Village Metro District (CVMD). They fear this proposal will have some serious impacts on the operations of Cascade Village. There are agreements in place with the Town, Vail Resorts, and easements in the area owned by CVMD. The easement agreements limit the owner’s ability to construct improvements with the prior consent of CVMD and the plans will interfere with the use of the easement. The CVMD board is opposed to this application and believes the application is inconsistent with the criteria and inappropriate for the 195 site, scale, height. If the previous approvals have expired, there is nothing in the bank. Since those amendments were approved, things have changed a great deal. This will block the view that many residents currently have to the mountains across I-70. The plan does not satisfy the requirement for compatibility. There will likely not be room for a larger lift with the new construction and decreased setback. The proximity of skiers in the area creates an additional hazard. The use of the skier plaza for grooming vehicles will put heavy equipment near increased skier traffic. The design features are not responsive to the overall aesthetic of the community. The lift space and paseo create concerns, there is additional need for snow removal. The vehicle and pedestrian access hasn’t been addressed. During winter months, Westhaven will be shaded, creating dangerous conditions for pedestrian and traffic circulation. There are many questions concerning the workability of the plan. How will the lift be workable during construction? How will Vail Resorts access during construction? These dictate that the project should not be approved at this time. Janie Lipnick says this will obliterate the views in the neighborhood, casting a shadow as well. Past approvals shouldn’t have a bearing on this. She is not opposed to development, but smart, sensitive development is possible. This is an odd site, worried about what it does to the skier plaza. Doesn’t think the infrastructure is there to create another portal or village. Where will day skiers go? Scott Wagner lives in the neighborhood. He shares some of the concerns already voiced.. The 2008 approval expired in 2017, doesn’t see why that should be relevant. Access from the frontage road is a challenge, especially with increased traffic count. This is a pie in the sky as another access point, the master plan is something Vail Resorts will have to work with the Forest Service on, there is also not room for an improved lift. Approval is needed from CVMD for work in the easement. The turnabout raises some concerns, re-doing that whole circle makes it a bigger safety hazard. The ticket office has management questions. The EHU units are already being built. Thad King is president of Liftside Condos. The owners of Liftside recently were made aware of this meeting. The notices weren’t mailed to the address that the county would have, instead it was sent to the Liftside building itself. They have concerns about setbacks, height, sun-shade, they will reserve final comments until they’ve had a chance to poll all of the owners. Rediker says the public can also put questions in writing for future meeting as this item will be continued. Lorenza Chico is at the Liftside building. She is not opposed to new buildings and is happy to see activation. But they do not want to see this increased height, increased setbacks, and more parking. Liftside is the only neighbor which isn’t owned by this ownership. They are impacted by the height and setbacks. Cascade is great community with respect for natural environment. 196 Bob Rosen lives in the neighborhood and is on the board for the CVMD. How can someone submit a proposal on land that they don’t control? CVMD has control of the easement, Cornerstone has not contacted them, how can they move forward with that? No further public comment. Rediker asks for commissioner comment. Tucker has concerns with the easement issues as well as sun-shading and restaurants so far from the serviceable loading dock. Would like to see an elevation plan for the basement. Smith says there is an obligation to get to yes as effectively and efficiently as possible but there are concerns. Per Staff questions, the housing component of the application is insufficient, quantitively, and qualitatively. You do have a desperate need for dorms to support the hotel, if you’re building that anyway building housing is great period. She encourages applicant to explore other opportunities for Housing and public-private partnerships. If the proposal is activation as a public benefit, it would be inconsistent to accept a private ski club as an activating use. This would go better if you acknowledge this is an all-inclusive private community with public benefit. The development standards are dependent on public benefit, which is currently insufficient. She struggles to understand established requirements, wants to seek legal advice on how to proceed with that. She understand there is a time requirement with the 2008 deal that expired. If we’re evaluating previous approvals, we also have to evaluate previous public benefits. She doesn’t understand parking required for commercial uses. You should work with your neighbors on resolving easement issues. Let’s make it happen but fix it. Lipnick says the building height went from 71’ to 97’ – when they got approval in 2008 a requirement from Council was to lower the height from 91’ to 71’. Worries about density and massing. Easements were not in the packet and have been brought to bear today, encourage you to meet with your neighbors and CVMD. The increase in GRFA, height, bulk, mass are not appropriate for this site. The dormitory style EHUs in the basement are not effective mitigation for inclusionary and commercial linkage. This does not accommodate for year-round employees and families. You should re-examine the tennis courts as a beneficial place for workforce housing. Does not think the public benefits outweigh the adverse effects of the deviations that are being requested. The space is inadequate for ski-base activity today, if you increase the number it will exacerbate the problems. There is a place for Cornerstone, would like to see it but you must work with your neighbors to figure it out in a more efficient way. Jensen says the massing and shadowing is unacceptable. Encourage you to talk about ski operations, it will need to be replaced at some point in the next ten years. Has concerns with height, the EHU’s feels like you’re warehousing your J1’s, could be convinced on parking. Never seen the PEC grant four exceptions. Complements you for looking at it, but you have to go back to drawing board and listen to neighbors and the community. The size of the east building looks better, the west not as much. Take the feedback respectively and rethink how you want to build it out. 197 Hagedorn thanks the applicants for the presentation. Being an engaged neighbor is importantly. How does PEC approach this with the easement conflict? Parking issues raise this concern about how does a third party factor in? Has concerns about activations and the large frontage dedicated to owner’s lounge-which is not the most active use. Agrees there is a lot of time spent on comparison to previous applications, but those rights are no longer vested. Would like to see how this varies from base level SDD that is currently in place. How can off-site units satisfying EHU requirements?. There is a lot of ask here, only two other buildings in Town that approach these height, don’t see a change in the give from last time. There is a path forward here, need to see how we get there. McBride shares concerns on height, parking, traffic, easement issues, and EHU proposal.Agrees this is a lot of ask without a lot of give. This proposal is an attempt to maximize this property, would like to see anything that can be done to compromise, does not want to impinge on property rights but we need to make sure the public interest is met. Rediker thanks applicant for the presentation today. He is concerned about dorm-style EHUs, and how the EHUs interplay with parking. Building height is a concern, the 2008 approval is not necessarily a benchmark, it can be taken under consideration but we are not bound to it. 91’ height is significant, 71’ is substantial, the owner’s lounge on the paseo level takes up a lot of space that is supposed to be active for other uses. The purpose is not to activate for the public, it is a private owner’s club. He is concerned about the lack of parking and increased density.. Both Town and applicant need to rethink turn lanes from the Frontage Road. He would like to understand how this development would impact Vail Resort’s current and future operations. The easement issues need to be straightened out before anything is approved, would like to hear from the Town Attorney before an approval. He doesn’t know that it can meet criteria No. 9 if easement rights are violated by proposed plan. Smith says this application seems to pivot on public benefit. We need to have a clear understanding of the public benefits that are being proposed. Spence confirms part of that analysis will be in the memo. 198 July 8, 2024 PEC Minutes Spence presents the changes from the previous meeting. These include changes by reducing the “Owner’s lounge” at the lowest level of the site and adding one additional EHU in the building. He goes over the potential public benefit that is included in the application. He also goes over the deviations of the project from the requirements of the SDD. Height and parking are the main variations of the proposal. The parking spaces were found to be undersized by the PW team as recently as the previous week. It will need to be determined if those spaces were originally striped that way or if that was a change at some point. Rediker has a question on how the reduction in the owner’s lounge has allayed staff’s concern on the topic. Spence answers that the reduction in size and locating it in the rear of the lowest level allows for the greatest commercial frontage. Rediker, so the PEC would have to determine that this is the appropriate use on that level of the site? Spence, that is correct. He refers to the CC1 district as the example but the determination can be made by the PEC. Rediker asks if there needs to be an amendment to the SDD. Spence states that the PEC would have to determine that this is an appropriate use in this location. Hagedorn asks if this is a ski club and if so that it would have to be considered the basement to allow. Spence, that is correct. Smith, does the town have a master plan for this area of town? Spence, the SDD is largely the plan overall for the area. There is no separate master plan for this area. Gennett, underlying this area is the land use plan for ski base area and there is no underlying zone district for this area. Jensen, SDD ski club locker space, this is similar to the village? Spence, The SDD borrows the CC1 zoning designation for uses on the first floor from the Vail Town Code. It uses those as the appropriate uses. Rediker, Question on parking. Can you explain to me on the conclusions on the availability of the parking spaces for this use not designated for other uses? 199 Spence, the 2016 parking analysis that was done analyzed the uses at that time. Some of those uses have been discontinued since then, so the number may be greater than reported. The current undersized spaces are a concern to the Town Engineer as it makes the spaces very hard to utilize. We encourage a restriping plan so it will give us an actual number of spaces per Code and how many needed per current and future use. Rediker, are we concerned with parking for the EHU? Spence, those will be in the garage as well and will most likely be 5-6 spaces. Rediker, we need 30 spaces, but those have to be proper size? Spence, I believe the town engineer would be in support of that. Hagedorn, there were concerns about the easements at the last meeting from public. Where has staff fallen on that? Spence, per the legal team, that is a civil matter that staff and the PEC does not concern with. Robyn, when did the spaces become undersized? Were the size requirements changed or were they always like that? Spence, we do not have that information on that. We don’t know when it was done, but spaces need to meet current day standards. Robyn, are there other active permits in that SDD? Spence, there are some permits for the event space above the parking area for safety items. Robyn, can we get a site visit? When do we make that request? Spence, now works, we can see when we can get that done to visit and the level of the current construction of the space. Prior to the meeting on July 22nd may be good. Robyn, asks for at least 4 hands on this request for a site visit on July 22nd. All members support this ask. Jensen, are all the spaces in the garage undersized? Tom Kassmel, Town engineer, says they did not measure all of the spaces but the majority of the spaces are around eight feet in width. He estimates that about 90% are 8' wide, some are a little less and a handful are 9' wide. Jensen, this could be a 15% loss? Kassmel, this could be a significant loss of spaces. 200 Rediker, we’ll have to see staff’s analysis and see what the number will be with the restriping of the spaces. We can update the table when we have those measurements in place? Spence, we will work with the applicant to get that done. Lipnick, how many spaces will be lost? Kassmel, we don’t know, maybe up to 20. Applicant Presentation Gabby Voeller, from SE Group The team went back through the commercial linkage and the inclusionary zoning requirements and goes over the table of those requirements. The three retail establishments, offices and other uses are in the table. She goes over commercial linkage and inclusionary zoning requirements and how the application is providing the housing as required. Joseph goes over some of the other comments from the PEC at the previous meeting. He shows the property owners in the area, easements on the site (including drop off and access through the site), the ticket office that does not sit in any easement). He shows the plaza level from the drop off and how the site plan meets that requirement of providing access through the site. The Paseo level shows the easements at that level going east/west on that site, and where the ticket office is being located. Alonso goes over that they had presentation with the metro district and Vail Resorts to go over the proposal. They’ve also had conversations with ERWSD on the easements and requirements. Holy Cross has also been worked with to determine if they have concerns. Joseph goes over the floorplan changes to the site and shows how the additional retail space has been added at the Paseo level. Alonso, there is an access point from the owner’s lobby, but that is the only part that now fronts on the paseo. Joseph goes over the change that added an employee housing unit to the building. Alonso goes over the CMC building and the employee housing. Originally accounted for 22 beds but the plan showed 25. For clarification the site is broken into 3 clusters where there are gathering spaces and ahs natural light coming in. They do share the kitchen and bathroom area, but they have more lounge areas. Joseph goes over the potential public benefit. He counts a lot of the landscaping changes that are being done on and off-site to create gathering spaces for users of the site. Part of the hotel site 201 will have a gathering space as well as the improved drop-off area. Wayfinding will be added to help direct people to the site. A site plan that shows how the project will improve connectivity to the site by adding areas to get to the lift from the hotel entrance and from Westhaven Drive. He goes over the retail that is being added to the site. He goes over the site plan from the last application compared to the current. The previous one did not have retail on the ski lift side. He shows renderings comparing the two elevations and how the previous approval was lower in most areas, but also higher at some points. It was one continuous building and roof ridge compared to the current proposal of two buildings. The applicant has met with the AIPP team to show the areas of potential public art. They were encouraged to make it in areas where it will be most viewable by the public. Alonso adds that the team is in conversations with the owner of the parking deck and are working towards an agreement with him. Jensen, can you walk us through the retail space depth at the paseo level. It seems small. Joseph says the depth is approximately 35’, with some recesses in the building. Goes down to 27, but could be increased. Jensen, what is the depth of the owners lounge and why does it need to be so deep? Alonso. It is about 30ft deep due to construction and access requirements. Ticket office is a little smaller closer to 20’. Rediker, you reference conversations with VR on the lift. What has been discussed? Has queueing for skiers come up? Alonso, more of an introduction to the project. No discussion of the queuing. They were open to the idea of relocation the ticket office, but no concerns brought up. Rediker, can you pull up the slide of the circulation and access? The front of the building would be for owner and skiers? Alonso, correct, but more for public as owners have parking area. Rediker, would loading/unloading take place there as well? Does this need to be designated for skiers only? Would there be a conflict there? Alonso, the hotel dock can accommodate the loading and delivery for retail areas and building. Rediker has concerns about FedEx or delivery trucks trying to use that space as well. Are we taking away the public benefit if we allow both? 202 Tom Kassmel, this would likely need to function as the West Lionshead drop off with two separate areas. One for cars and one for deliveries. Rediker, concerns on how that would be used and timing. Needs to be short timeline for skiers as they don’t need 15 minutes. Kassmel, it would need to be managed and reviewed. Alonso, we need to see what the need is for this. 2-5 minutes for skiers and if there is need for parking it would be done in the structure. Rediker, the skier drop off is the benefit, not general loading and delivery. Tucker, loading dock is too far away. Doesn’t think it will be used well and people will try to use that drop off instead of the proper area. Alonso, starting to think internally of how these spaces would operate. It would likely be the hotel that would operate these areas. Smith, doesn’t appear as there is two way traffic to the NE of the drop-off island. Is that one way or two way traffic outside of the drop-off? Alonso, two way so they would not need to enter the drop off to exit from Westhaven. The idea is that this would make it as efficient as possible. Smith, As there are external vendors that use that loading area, does it use the same service elevator as EHUs or is there another? Alonso, there is another elevator for the hotel. No loading and delivery would be done through the EHU area. Robyn, curious about the VR conversation. It seems like replacing the lift after this is built would be much more expensive. Would they do it if this goes through? Alonso, we can’t speak for them. They know this is proposed and the challenges that it would make for replacing that lift. It’s up to them to figure out if that is a possibility. Smith, it is up to us as well as the lift access is a public benefit. If it changes to a faster lift, that is a bigger benefit. It would be extremely difficult to get it there after the fact. Alonso, we are working towards a mutual solution. Lipnick, why is the lift office a public benefit? Alonso, it is being included in the building itself as well as bathrooms and lockers. 203 Lipnick, I understand the bathrooms. VR hasn’t signed off on the building being inside? Alonso, we have had one meeting with them so far. It is an attractive solution for everyone to have it inside the building. Lipnick, where is the offsite skating rink and play area? Alonso, it is on hotel property now at the base of the area. It is a temporary area today that is then used for other items in the summers. We would be making it permanent and open to the public on a continuous basis. Rediker, the ice rink is not on the Cornerstone site, correct? Alonso, yes. Rediker, there is no requirement for that to maintain unless restricted publicly, correct? Alonso, yes, that is a possibility, but the general ownership has no intention to do so and want it to be successful. Rediker, if cornerstone is developed as residential spaces, the owners will change as the units are sold. Are the retail spaces going to change hands or be sold to the residential owners as well and then they can change? Has trouble as these being amenities if these are not restricted to be maintained. No control over what happens to that space. Hagedorn agrees. These need to be guaranteed to be maintained in perpetuity so that they are a true public benefit. The Solaris has a very similar setup that could be a great public benefit. Rediker, if that hotel is sold to another owner how is that maintained as an offsite proposed public benefit. Would like to hear from staff at the next meeting Smith, do we have a definition of public benefit? Spence, no we do not. Smith, this seems programmatic and how do we guarantee that into the future. Roy goes over the setup for the Solaris and how that would likely be similar. There is a maintenance plan in place and that should also be considered. Hagedorn, how tied are the applicants to the owner’s lounge, especially the 30' frontage? Alonso, not tied, but more retail would require more commercial linkage. Hagedorn goes over the TC and their feelings have been communicated to PEC on the ground level uses and ski lockers in the area. 204 Smith asks how the short term rental program works for their units. her understanding is that the Hyatt runs a short term rental program for any properties that are to be rented in the Cascade district. Trying to understand how it may be rented to guests. Alonso can have more information next time from his team that works on that. Smith wants to know how that would be handled as this site would likely be very likely or attractive for owners to use for that purpose. How much business does short term rentals bring to town and what the difference would be if these are not short term rented we will end up with a largely vacant building at the base of the ski area. Would also love to hear what the master plan for the site would be for the area as a whole. Rediker asks about current building height approval is 71 and applicant wants 97 feet, is that correct? Spence confirms. Rediker, so as a commissioner we are looking at the 26 feet as a deviation and we are using the criteria when reviewing this application. Is the proposed height looking at criteria 1 for compatibility? Spence confirms. Rediker, for applicant, we’ve been through two meetings and both times commissioners have made comments on the height and its not compatible to the area. Why have there been no changes to the building height? Alonso, says it is part of the ask and they want deviation on that and are trying to balance with the benefits of the project. Rediker, so the applicant is saying that the height is compatible and the public benefit should bring it to an approvable place. Alonso, we believe that the public benefits would out weigh any potential deviations based on the height. Rediker asks for a review of the public benefits. Joseph, paseo level, bringing retail and activated space, the improved drop off and stairs down, improving the general landscape through the general development and circulation through the site. Rediker, has a question on the parking, but who owns the garage again and how do we guarantee that those spaces will always be allocated for that site and not torn down and dedicated to another use. Is staff worried about that? 205 Spence, staff believes that the wording in the SDD would be enough to maintain the use of those spaces over time. Rediker, we’re counting on that place being a parking lot forever, right? They may lose control over time. Spence, a development agreement would need to be done over time to ensure it is maintained. Gennett, says that a development agreement would be done where it guarantees it would be done over time. Rediker notes the difference in ownership compared to the Solaris that is one ownership compared to this lot which could very easily have three different ownerships and how do they guarantee that be done overtime? Gennett, those would have to be done through a development agreement and would like to speak with the Town Attorney on how that would be guaranteed over time. Rediker would like to have more information on that at the next meeting. Hagedorn would like better context imagery to show more of how it fits into the site. Spence notes that the massing model would likely be a good way to visualize that The applicants bring up the massing model for viewing. Rediker, question for staff, for the housing requirement are they allowed under town code to use dorms? Spence confirms that is allowed at the discretion of Town Council. Hagedorn, could other buildings be able to use that height? Spence says that it would be tied to this specific site plan and building. Smith, asks if we can require parking to charge the same rate as the town or not? Spence, no, it would be specific to the building. Kassmel says that there is no current requirement like that, and that they will charge what the market will bear. Smith says there was conversation out there that the layer of parking was required to charge the same rate as the public garages. Would like staff to look into that. 206 Lipnick still has trouble with the proposed height and how it is not compatible with the other buildings. Rediker, has questions on the dorms. Is it one common kitchen? How do that work in the dorms? Alonso, would have two of everything as far as appliances as well as areas to eat. Common areas have tables and bars to eat at as well. Lipnick, one bathroom for 25 people? Alonso, no there are multiple stalls for each bathroom. Public comment Thad King, President to the Liftside condominium association has sent a letter if they had received it. Hagedorn has not seen it yet. Thad asks that the commissioners read it before the next meeting. They are asking for a lot of increases in height, density, and GRFA that is incompatible with SDD 4. There are no specific setbacks as there are for Liftside. The applicant is proposing setbacks of zero feet and it is unjustified and unnecessary for reasonable development of the site. A survey shows the footprints for the existing buildings in the development area. There are a couple instances where setbacks are at or near property lines but the difference is that the lot lines were at or near a public open space or right of way. In most instances otherwise there were generous setbacks between building footprints and property lines so they don’t negatively impact buildings on the adjacent parcels. Does not see where it is necessary or compatible to eliminate setbacks on the property. Have a concern with the proposed height at 97 feet. Out of compatibility with Liftside at 55 feet and 65 feet along the south side. The proposed height combined with the design of the roof forms are unlike any in development area A. It exacerbates the perceived height the way the roof forms are done. The hipped roof design at Liftside lowers the perceived height and mass of structures by bringing the top floor into the roof or roof down into the top floor. The proposed design and character are foreign to the buildings in development A. The design being proposed might be compatible if it was in Lionshead or village but doesn’t seem consistent with the development of building area A. Cascade village is understated in design currently as it has hipped roofs, white stucco, and stone. The proposed cornerstone does not align with the context of the areas. The shading is another concern where the sun/shade angles with and without the building. It is hard to see what the summer solstice is. Set dates and times do not have a complete timeline that would show the affect at all times of the day. Could be affecting their pool area and would like to see shading study at the 71’ height to show the impact of the additional height. Additionally, the NE corner of the building would face the Liftside building and would allow the residents to look down on the pool deck. Would like the developer to review the floor plan to flip the floor plan to reduce balconies on that side. Cornerstone plan shows minimal landscaping. 207 In conclusion would like to see justification for reduced setbacks similar to the variance requirements as to why they cannot build to normal setbacks, ask applicant compare proposed site coverage compared to existing sites and calc existing site coverage in area A for comparison. Would like to have height reduced, move away from butterfly roof design, and that the applicant update the sun/shade analysis to show all times and compare to a 71’ height of building. Redesign floor plan to move the balconies to the other side. Kim Setter, attorney for Cascade metro district. The applicant did attend a board meeting, the participation was gladly accepted. They are looking into the easements and requirements at this time. More information will be given to the PEC prior to the August 12th. They would like to see an agreement between them, VR, and the applicant so that there is a public benefit into the future. This is needed for the agreement for the use of the ski lift and other requirements the district is required for. Drainage has not been addressed yet. Public benefit is intertwined with the lift, and it’s continued operation. District and VR finance the lift, maintenance, replacement and other financing. The escalator and other improvements are a big part of the public benefit. The district and VAI(VR) operate the lift per an agreement which imposes burdens on the district to help with the finance based on ridership. The district is responsible for snow removal and maintenance for all the access to the lift. The district must provide a certain number of items per the agreement including stairs, lift ticket office, bathrooms, etc… The applicants will render these agreements inoperable and the new design will require a new agreement to agree on maintenance, operability, parking etc… This is concerning as escalators may break and provide an unserviceable entrance to the area. Under the proposal the district may be required to maintain the escalator. The applicant is moving and replacing lockers, affecting the district’s abilities to maintain the lockers. Would need an MOU or some agreement about lift replacement or repair. The district requests the amendment be denied or at least a recommendation of approval that an agreement be provided from the district, VR, and the applicant to ensure continued lift operation and maintenance. Scott Wagner, 1225 Westhaven. Reaffirms the concerns from Kim. Wood stairs were rebuilt last year, and safety needs to be first. 50’ escalator is a big concern about it being able to be maintained and useable at all times. Can’t remember if paseo is heated or not. Would like answer to that. Access at the lift house, would want to know if ski racks would be provided at the top for drop off. Proposal at the paseo would allow for good access. Not sure why circle needs to be redone. Eliminating or reducing the turn lanes, but there is a lot of traffic that goes on that. Speed limits are high and needs a turn lane in that area. Decreasing the turn lane from east to west would pose a problem for the buses and there may not be enough room without the turn lane. The ice rink that has been discussed is pretty small and maybe inadequate. The new area would be about 70% of the size of the current one. Would this be a good use where the fire pits that are today are used a lot more. Want to know how the logistics would work for construction ingress/egress. How would construction affect ski lift during wintertime. Height is not congruent with what is in the neighborhood today. The approval expired in 2017 and we should not be referencing that as a starting point. 208 Janie Lipnick on the metro board. Agrees with Scott and Kim. Really object to the height as it ruins views coming in and out. It goes outside of the character of the neighborhood. The public benefit does not outweigh the offset. Concerns with construction for access to and from the neighborhood. The skier drop-off back up could cause traffic delays. Prior approvals should not count. Why does that still have part of the conversation. No agreements form the district on the project. Closed public comment. Comments from commissioners John Rediker, parking, public benefits off-site (if those should be considered). From Staff, he is concerned with the easements and operation/access agreements. Metro district concerns seem very applicable and “compatibility with surrounding uses “criteria may not be able to be met without that agreement. Bulk, height, mass, and setbacks are not compatible. We’ve raised, bulk, height and mass issues and there have been no changes. Concerned on the dormitory housing and PEC has discretion. It may house temporary employees and may not have fulltime housing use. Has said enough earlier that does not need to repeat. McBride online agrees with commissioner Rediker and he conveyed his concerns accurately and shares that concern. How are those previous approvals and why those should be taken fully into account? Tucker, agrees on the easements and issues. Need to figure out who will operate commercial spaces as it could impact the loading/delivery. Smith, thanks applicant for moving around the owner’s lounge to reduce access and including another EHU. Housing component does not meet minimum standards, not supportive of dorms. Public benefit does not justify the deviation for mass and scale. Public benefit proposed so far would be accomplished by a smaller building, and 97' needs to be much more. Reserve judgment on parking and compatibility on lift operation, and master plan for the area until applicant provides more information. States that applicant is sitting on aces, so don't fold. Lipnick, thanks applicant for presentation. Remains concerned about off-site public benefits and parking if the ownership were to ever change. Concerned about easements, height, massing, lack of setbacks, compatibility with neighborhood, dorm style EHUs (doesn’t work for families and year-round employees), parking in general and how many will be maintained after making them conform. Agrees with Smith concerning a site visit to clarify many items. Jensen, thanks applicant for their work, but still a lot to be done. This redevelopment is incredibly complex, and comments today have reinforced that. Seems early to be in front of the PEC until these issues have been resolved. Appreciate the owners lounge, but it should be reduced further to be more utilitarian space for owners rather than a lounge. Staff has work to do on the parking and how that will be impacted. Access to the lift and impacts to the stairs. Can’t get to the 97’ height. Public benefits would be reasonable if the project was asking for little 209 deviation. Does not work for what is being proposed today. Needs to preserve the integrity of the community. Hagedorn thanks applicant for the detailed presentation. Future lift replacement does not fit into conversation. Public benefit is the big part of the conversation and how the proposed benefits will be maintained into the future. What is the method that would require that to be continued in perpetuity. Parking continues to evolve at each meeting. Will need to know definite, final solution and how that will be maintained into the future. Setbacks don’t bother, but the height is too much. 71’ is in line with other area, but 97' is not justifiable. Looking forward to seeing what is provided next. Rediker, we don’t typically look at design of the building but there are 9 criteria in the memo and one of those is design features. 210 KIM J. SETER BARBARA T. VANDER WALL COLIN B. MIELKE ELIZABETH A. DAUER RUSSELL NEWTON JOEL T. DREW {00735587} 7400 E. ORCHARD ROAD • SUITE 3300 • GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 • 303-770-2700 • FAX: 303-770-2701 www.svwpc.com • e-mail: svw@svwpc.com May 20, 2024 Town of Vail Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission 75 S. Frontage Road West 75 S. Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 Vail, CO 81657 Attn: Matt Mire, Esq. at Attn: Jonathan Spence at mmire@vailgov.com jspence@vailgov.com Davis Partnership, P.C. 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 Attn: Joe Lear at info@davispartnership.com Re: Parks Hospitality Holdings Pre-Application for Future Development of Cornerstone Parcel: Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision-1276 Westhaven Drive PEC Work Session: March 11, 2024 Proposed Amendment to SDD #4 (the "Project") To Whom it May Concern: This firm represents the Cascade Village Metropolitan District, a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the state of Colorado (the "District"). The District's Board of Directors recently became aware of the Pre-Application for Future Development of Cornerstone Project that was presented to the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission on March 11, 2024. During the work session there were several references to the ski lift access easement and pedestrian access easement (slide A23 magenta and yellow). Please be aware that the District is the grantee of the easements related to those properties along with Vail Resorts. The easements are comprehensive and include most of the indicia of ownership of the property. They may be found at Recording No. 331165, Book 464, Page 940; and 552229, Book 656, Page 196. There are other easements and documents concerning this property that will be revealed in the title commitments. In June of 2005, Liftside Condominium Association purported to be the fee owner of the "skier plaza" area which included both easement areas described above. At that time, Liftside entered into an Easement Deed Agreement with Cascade Village recorded at Doc. ID 927401 on August 25, 2005. The agreement conveyed the full use of the property to the District and states in paragraph 3, that "Grantor shall not construct or place any structure, building or other improvements on the Premises without the prior consent of [the District]." 211 Town of Vail/Davis Partnership Re: Cascade Village MD / Future Development of Cornerstone Project May 20, 2024 Page 2 of 2 {00735587} In sum, the District appears to have nearly all of the indicia and rights of ownership to these two parcels which are an integral part of or substantially affected by the proposed Future Development of the Cornerstone parcel. Furthermore, the Liftside Agreement gives the District the right of prior approval of any construction. The District Board does not see how the proposed plan can be compatible with the District's current rights and responsibilities under numerous agreements and easement conveyances. As a result of the foregoing discussion, the District requests notice of any applications or reviews concerning the Project and asks that it be included in the process early to avoid any unnecessary costs or expenses that might result from later objections or required changes. Finally, the District should be included in the referral agencies for any applications regarding this Project. Just as importantly, PEC rules and regulations require joint property owner sign off for any Design Review or Planning and Environmental Applications. The Joint Property Owner Written Approval Letter states that the "applicant must submit written joint property owner approval for applications affecting shared ownership properties ..." Because of the easements and easement terms discussed above, the District is a "Joint Property Owner" and District sign off on any applications should be required in order to allow the District to monitor the process and effects on its rights and responsibilities. Thank you for including the District in the processing of any applications. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Please contact me if you have any questions, comments or concerns. Sincerely, SETER, VANDER WALL & MIELKE, P.C. Kim J. Seter cc: Cascade Village Metro District Board of Directors 212 970.476.8865 CELAW.COM Vail and Summit County Office June 24, 2024 Town of Vail Community Development Attn. Mr. Jonathan Spence Re: Cornerstone Lot, 1276 Westhaven Drive PEC 24-0016 Dear Mr. Spence: I represent the owner of and applicant in connection with the above property (“Cornerstone Lot”). I have been provided with a copy of the letter dated May 20, 2024 from Kim Seter, Esq. on behalf of his client, Cascade Village Metropolitan District (“District”) to you and other Town officials with respect to the Cornerstone Lot. As more fully explained below, that letter contains certain statements that are false and/or misleading including with respect to the District’s claimed rights and interests in the Cornerstone Lot. I am writing to correct and set the record straight. By way of background, the Cornerstone Lot is an unimproved parcel of land approximately 0.6997 acres in size located north of the Vail Grand Hyatt Hotel and otherwise bordered by Westhaven Drive and the Liftside Condominium property. The Cornerstone and Liftside Lots were created by the recording of the Final Plat, Liftside/Cornerstone on November 30, 1994 as Reception No. 55230 (“Final Plat”). A copy of the Final Plat is attached hereto as Exhibit A. On May 22, 2017, my client, Vail Land Partners LLC, purchased and took title to the Cornerstone Lot. As further explained below, the District’s only interest in the Cornerstone Lot is as one of two grantees of the Public Access Easement for Pedestrians recorded June 23, 1987, as Reception No. 361165 (“Pedestrian Easement”). A copy of the Pedestrian Easement is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Attached as Exhibit C is a recent title commitment for the Cornerstone Lot (“Commitment”) showing the Pedestrian Easement as the only easement on the Cornerstone Lot that the District has an interest in. The Final Plat and recent survey of the Cornerstone Lot (“Survey”) depict the Pedestrian Easement which is approximately 42 feet wide and runs north-south across the width of the Cornerstone Lot for pedestrian access for the “general public” to the Cascade Lift and skiing on Vail Mountain. The relevant portion of the Survey is attached hereto as Exhibit D. The Pedestrian Easement is non-exclusive and in no way prohibits, or somehow gives the District any approval rights over, the development of the Cornerstone Lot (formerly known as “Building C Site”). In fact, the Pedestrian Easement contemplates the construction of improvements on the subject property and the only limit on the development imposed is that there can be no “construction of any improvements within the Easement or over the Easement at a height lower than twelve feet…” presumably to allow pedestrian access. (emphasis added). The applicant’s proposal for the Cornerstone Lot fully addresses Daniel F. Wolf Vail and Summit County Office 970.476.8865| F: 970.476.0446 3107 Iris Ave, Suite 100 Boulder, CO 80301-1915 303.443.8010 | F: 303.440.3967 dwolf@celaw.com www.celaw.com 213 Mr. Jonathan Spence June 24, 2024 Page | 2 and complies with that limitation. That height limitation thereby allows the construction of improvements above twelve feet over the Pedestrian Easement. As explained above and demonstrated by the enclosed title documents and most importantly the express language of the Pedestrian Easement itself, the Pedestrian Easement is not “comprehensive” and does not “include most of the indicia of ownership” of the Cornerstone Lot as claimed by the District and its counsel. The attached title documents further undeniably show that skier plaza area as established and encumbered by the Easement Deed and Agreement by and between the District and Liftside recorded 08/25/2005 as Reception No. 927401 (“Liftside Agreement”), is not part of the Cornerstone Lot, contrary to what the District also suggests.See Survey, Final Plat and Commitment attached. The Liftside Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit E. The current and prior owners of the Cornerstone Lot are not parties, never mind grantors, to the Liftside Agreement, and the Liftside Agreement does not encumber the Cornerstone Lot contrary to what the District suggests. It appears the Liftside Agreement encumbers only a portion of the Liftside Lot. The Liftside Agreement accordingly as a matter of law does not and cannot give any rights to the District with respect to the unrelated Cornerstone Lot, never mind “the right of prior approval of any construction” again as claimed by the District. The District does not own a fee simple interest in the skier plaza area which is held by Liftside. In sum, the District has nointerest in the Cornerstone Lot that entitles it to any unique or special treatment or standing in the Town approval process. As the Town has already correctly held, the District is not somehow a “joint property owner” of the Cornerstone Lot by virtue of merely being a grantee of the Pedestrian Easement. Similarly, the District is not an appropriate referral agency with respect to my client’s application as to the Cornerstone Lot. The District is and should be treated by the Town as no more than a member of the public. I welcome any questions you or other Town officials may have about the Cornerstone Lot and would be happy to meet or have a call to discuss. Sincerely, CAPLAN AND EARNEST LLC Daniel F. Wolf DFW/clf cc. Vail Land Partners LLC Kim Seter, EsqMatt Mire, Esq.4878-5561-6713, v. 1 214 (;+,%,7$ 21 5              MGġ NG1ġ Ìġ ġ ġ H)ġ ġ  Çġ ,) 0ġ H0ġ          Čġ28 8 ~À Ï Oġ  ġ    ġ ,ġ …ġ 1ġ Yġ 2ġ  <ġ *#ġ ġ ġ #ġ ġ ªġ ġ Óġ C ġ ðġ ˜2ġ MGġ :ā9ġ ß5 ġ Íġ ġ ġ H1ġ +ġ  7ġ j0=ġ H=ġ *''              ,ġ      Áåó)ġ  ġlġ N ™ Å ġ /Dġ Œġ æb ġ ?Vġ                  >§> > ¡ġ ėġ   × ġ {ġ 3C ġ cġ :ġ B nġ¢ġ Øġ ġ  ġ  7 ġ :ġ éAçAèÂnAġ £šġ >ġ ÎäÈñàAâïġ   Ęęġ ġ Ěġ  ġ‰Šġ õġ øěË   Lġ'¸ġ² ¤ġ ¿+)ġ Ý_'›ġ êL³<ġ , L)+ġ ‘ ġ ¯";ġ 9ġ    ġ ¨€¹ġ 9ġ '2+Sġ       =ġ Æ ġ î2ġ Yġ )ġ  )ġ *#ġ ġ +ġ #ġ ġ ġ 9#ġ Ċþġ =1ġ !""', !& , #,$, &$"!",#$, "8 *"8 '"! 8 ,"  8 '$"8 $#"+8  8 %8 ġ  "±ġ ġ +)ġ       ġ ?+ ġh"hÜġ ġ *2ġ )8 !8 8     ġ Ð Nġ ;ýġ "8 8 *"8 ("!8 -" 8 ($"  8 /8 $#")8 88 .8  68)8 888 %8  !8 &"8!8!8 ċġ ]";ġ ġ <ġ *"8 8   ġ '"8 ! 8 78 B  ġ ,"!!8 /Dġ K#ġ ($"8  !8 8 8 Ĉ 3 ġ ġ $#"+8  8 88 %8   08  X^'ġ  ġ !"", !& , #, % , ,#$,     Ùġ µġ C3C :ġ ġ }ġ *#ġ 3,Wò 5,ġ 105 Ñ Oġ ĔġÃtġ  ,»ġ uġ _ġ ġl‚ġ  X0ġ ôġ *ġ  žġ 1ġ Jġ /ġVġK’7953ġ  ¼ġ [Z®«Zº[ġ              %5 5 5 5 (45 Ĝġ   gġ    Ûġ    ‡ġ ĝġ      5  ġ—“ ġ „ġ ),+,    *5  5 .5   5            @mEFFġ F8ÉëdEkġ EÔġ @ÖaemÞeÕġ 8aF8á8ãoġ kEod@8½ġ Ä($&ûġ ġ @Ă($ġ ăĄčġ !.ġ -.ġ --ġ !ġ püpġ &ġ P$ġ .qġ !ġ $úġ Qġ %Qġ .(R!ġ rQ%ÿġ %Iąġ !Iġ 64Iġ !.ġ 6&Iġ $&R(ġ .%ġ $61ġ Úġ ġ Rœġ -!ġ !ġ &ġ P$ġ .qġ !ġ $64ġ &ġ 4%&ġ .ĉ!ġ Pġ --$ġ -(ġ %ġ ġ !(ġ 6(-ġ %ġ $4ġ 6ġ 4%ġ (4&ù&4&ġ %rġ %(2ġ ġ T?ġS\ġ ġ '0ġ    ġ °"ćġ ġ  <"ġ ¥ġ    8 18 43358      Ğġ Gj ġ Ê  ġ ¾ġ Ÿġ ”B  ìġ wġ z† /Dġ K#ġ Ćġ ­Āġ  3ġ ‹ ÷ğġ ¬x yö            ġ TJ"\ġ ġ  ġġ0ƒġ   O5ġ cġ +"ġ `ġ   #ġ  : ,ġ |ġ ďĐđġ `•¶i5ġ 7  ġ –ġ/iġ #ġ  3ġ ^Ďġ     %5 5 5 5  5 0UĒġ  ,ġ Mġ J"ġ Žġ  ġ 7  ġ ¦ Ġġ /Dġ ġ b ġ 'sġ /ĕġ  í ġ ÒġĖB   ġ ffs  5 5 35 *5 2 5 .5   5  *,    ġ ©"´;ġ ġ *1ēġ  "#5 &!5 *$%+*5 +&5 5 %&%5 /5 *'),5 &-$%+5          gġ     ˆġ ġ *]?'U·vġ ġ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{00747277 2} 7400 E. ORCHARD ROAD • SUITE 3300 • GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 • 303-770-2700 • FAX: 303-770-2701 www.svwpc.com • e-mail: svw@svwpc.com August 8, 2024 Town of Vail Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission 75 S. Frontage Road West 75 S. Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 Vail, CO 81657 Attn: Matt Mire, Esq. at Attn: Jonathan Spence at mmire@vailgov.com jspence@vailgov.com Davis Partnership, P.C. 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 Attn: Joe Lear at info@davispartnership.com Re: Parks Hospitality Holdings Pre-Application for Future Development of Cornerstone Parcel: Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision-1276 Westhaven Drive PEC Work Session: Proposed Major Amendment to SDD #4 (the "Project") To Whom it May Concern: This firm represents the Cascade Village Metropolitan District, a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the state of Colorado (the "District"). SDD # 4 was established by Ordinance No. 5, Series 1976 to "ensure unified and coordinated development and use of a critical site as a whole and in a manner suitable for the area …." The District was formed with Town approval of its Service Plan on January 21, 1986 (Resolution No. 5) to assist in and provide coordination and financing for some of the improvements required in SDD # 4. The District would provide street improvements and sanitation improvements (storm, flood and surface drainage facilities). Numerous access and construction easements were secured for these purposes ("Original Easements"). A Public Access Easement was conveyed across the Cornerstone site granting the property right to VAI and the District jointly, to allow ingress and egress between the public roads and Vail Ski Area for: (1) pedestrian access by the public relating to ski-activities; and (2) use by VAI and the District to the extent reasonably necessary or convenient in connection with ownership and operation of the Lift (the "Public Access Easement"). A second, identical Public Access Easement was conveyed across the Lift Side site which was replaced by a Skier Plaza Agreement in 2005. 250 Town of Vail/Davis Partnership Re: Cascade Village MD / Future Development of Cornerstone Project August 8, 2024 Page 2 of 4 {00747277 2} Westhaven Drive was dedicated to the Town in 1993. All District easements related to Westhaven Drive and the District's responsibility for Westhaven Drive expired upon dedication. An Amended and Restated Service Plan was approved in 2008 to allow construction and reconstruction of the Westhaven bridge and that portion of Westhaven Drive from the bridge to the Frontage Road which includes the skier drop off area. The improvements were completed. After construction of Lift 20, the District, Vail Associates, Inc. and Vail Ventures, Ltd. entered into a comprehensive Operations and Maintenance Agreement that identifies obligations to be fulfilled if the lift is to continue in operation ("O&M Agreement"). The Applicant seeks a Major Amendment to SDD #4. Comments and correspondence have been provided on behalf of the District's Board of Directors at prior PEC meetings. The District incorporates its prior comments here because they have not been addressed. The importance of the skier drop, skier access, skier plaza, ticket house and Lift 20 to the Applicant and the District taxpayers is clear. Several PEC members noted that the skier access and related facilities are "the public benefit" offered by the proposed project. The proposed changes to the skier drop, public access and area around the skier plaza, including the Ticket House and Lift have implications for the District and VAI's property rights under the Public Access Easement, their historic use of the area and the continued operation of the Lift. The District has had no communications with the Applicant since the last PEC meeting; but, feels it is important to reaffirm its previous comments and identify the matters that it currently knows must be addressed. I. Ski Lift Operations and Maintenance Agreement - O&M Agreement The District is obligated to pay "all Lift operations and maintenance costs" ("O&M Costs") under the terms of the O&M Agreement. VAI only operates the Lift by agreement and at the expense of the District. The District's obligations include maintenance and snow removal for "all … real property surrounding and accessing the Lift, including the ticket office, bathrooms, all stairs leading to the lift access area, lockers, general area of the lower Lift terminal, bike paths, the Skier Bridge and the Lift platform." In addition to the payment of all expenses and maintenance of these facilities, the District must: (a) provide access to the ticket house, bathrooms and lockers to VAI employees; (b) provide access via the Public Access Easement and Skier Plaza Agreement; (c) provide 6 parking spaces for VAI employees; and (d) access for trail and other maintenance and lift repairs. The District also provides insurance coverage and indemnification to VAI to the extent permitted by law for all injury or damage to any person suffered within these areas of responsibility. 251 Town of Vail/Davis Partnership Re: Cascade Village MD / Future Development of Cornerstone Project August 8, 2024 Page 3 of 4 {00747277 2} Without the District's fulfillment of the O&M obligations, VAI has no obligation or incentive to continue the Lift operations. The District's fulfillment of the obligations is only made possible by the property rights conveyed to it by the Public Access Easement. II. Public Access Easement The Public Access Easement was conveyed by Vail Ventures, Ltd. to VAI and the District on June 6, 1987. The Public Access Easement was not granted to the public in general. The public access is controlled by the District and VAI under the terms of the Public Access Easement. Control, maintenance and operation of the Public Access Easement is the responsibility of the District under the O&M Agreement. The Public Access Easement provides that the grantor (now Cornerstone) may grant other easements but may not "construct or allow the construction of any improvements within the easement at a height lower than twelve feet..." and "shall not unreasonably interfere with the rights granted" to the District and VAI to allow, control and maintain public access and facilities. The proposed plans interfere with the historic operations and maintenance of the Public Access Easement by the District and VAI and their right to provide or not provide access for skier related activities and in connection with operation of the Lift. In fact, the Public Benefit proposed by the Applicant is to replace the stairs and facilities installed and maintained by the District with the Applicant's preferred system. While the Applicant's proposed improvements to the access may be more elegant than the District's existing improvements, Applicant has no right or authority to construct any improvements less than 12 feet above the land surface and it may not interfere with the rights of the District and VAI to provide that access without approval. In sum, in addition to addressing comments provided at earlier PEC meetings, the Applicant must work with the District and VAI to resolve the issues regarding the access, costs; perpetual use of the proposed new ticket facility; and maintenance, indemnification and other responsibilities that currently enable and/or enforce continued operation of Chair 20. In keeping with its Service Plan responsibilities, the District also requests a copy of a drainage study from the Applicant. The District believes these issues need to be addressed before there is any recommendation to the Town concerning a Major Amendment to SDD # 4 because continued access to and operation of Chair 20 is a critical component of the existing and proposed development and the Public Benefit offered to secure the SDD Amendment. Thank you again for your attention and consideration of these matters. Your hard work and dedication is greatly appreciated. 252 Town of Vail/Davis Partnership Re: Cascade Village MD / Future Development of Cornerstone Project August 8, 2024 Page 4 of 4 {00747277 2} Please contact me if you have any questions, comments or concerns. Sincerely, SETER, VANDER WALL & MIELKE, P.C. Kim J. Seter cc: Cascade Village Metro District Board of Directors 253 August 9, 2024 Dear Planning and Environmental Commission, Vail Resort Operations has met with the PHH Development representative as well as members of the Cascade Village Metro District Board of Directors to review the proposed Cornerstone Development Project. Until the Town of Vail’s Planning and Environmental Commission has completed its process, we believe it is premature for the Resort to engage in further conversations regarding the project. Please let us know if further discussions are necessary to align with the project goals. Jeffrey Babb Sr. Director Resort Operations Vail Mountain – Vail Resorts jeffb@vailresorts.com O: (970) 754-4008 C: (970) 331-5959 254 255 CORNERSTONE PEC Presentation. August 26, 2024. 1 256 Table of contents: 3 13 21 27 29 33 39 74 78 80 83 •Cascade Village Master Plan. •Existing site conditions. •Easements •Building setbacks. •Project Comparison. •Building heights. •Shadow Study. •Aria Parking •Paseo Level Use •Employee Housing Units •Public Benefit ………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………. 2 257 CASCADE VILLAGE MASTER PLAN. 3 The Broader Vision. 258 Gore Creek Westhaven Dr. I 70 S Frontage Rd W Existing Buildings: 1.Grand Hyatt Vail 2.Aria Spa, Gym & Parking 3.Cornerstone (lot) 4.CMC Building 5.Tennis Courts (lot) 6.Westhaven Building 7.Liftside Condominiums 8.Millrace Condominiums 9.Cascades on Gore Creek 10.Cascade Lift 31 1 2 4 1 7 9 8 5 10 6 Cascade Village Master Plan. The Broader Vision. 4 VICINITY MAP. EXISTING CONDITIONS. 259 Gore Creek Westhaven Dr. I 70 S Frontage Rd W 5 31 1 2 4 1 7 9 8 5 10 6 Existing Buildings: 1.Grand Hyatt Vail 2.Aria Spa, Gym & Parking 3.Cornerstone (lot) 4.CMC Building 5.Tennis Courts (lot) 6.Westhaven Building 7.Liftside Condominiums 8.Millrace Condominiums 9.Cascades on Gore Creek 10.Cascade Lift VICINITY MAP PARCELS. Cascade Village Master Plan. The Broader Vision. 260 Gore Creek Westhaven Dr. I 70 S Frontage Rd W Properties Under Ownership: 1.Grand Hyatt Vail 2.Aria Spa, Gym & Parking 3.Cornerstone (lot) 4.CMC Building (90% of the commercial side) 5.Tennis Courts (lot) 6 31 1 2 4 1 5 VICINITY MAP PARCEL OWNERSHIP. Cascade Village Master Plan. The Broader Vision. 261 Gore Creek Westhaven Dr. I 70 S Frontage Rd W Properties that are Currently Under-Utilized: A.Aria Spa, Gym, Alpine Hall B.Cornerstone (lot) C.CMC Building (90% of the commercial side) •Theaters •Offices •Retail D.Tennis Courts (lot) E.Cascade Lift B A E D 7 Cascade Village Master Plan. The Broader Vision. UNDER-UTILIZED AREAS. C 262 Gore Creek Westhaven Dr. S Frontage Rd W 2 13 Identified Potential (Re)Development Opportunities within Ownership’s control: 1.New Development: Retail / Parking / EHUs / Residential. 2.(Re)Development: Parking Structure (existing) / New Parking / Residential. 3.(Re)Development: EHUs / Retail & Office. 8 Cascade Village Master Plan. The Broader Vision. POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES. 263 •Revitalize Cascade Village. •Reposition Cascade Village as a “gateway” to Vail Mountain. •Recycle idle space. •Support the positioning of new infrastructure much needed to serve the community . •Create “new” destination to increase traffic and energy to the Village. 9 Cascade Village Master Plan. The Broader Vision. OVERALL PROJECT GOALS. 264 •Residential Density •Employee Housing •Retail Activation •Public and Community Parking •Transportation •Community Center ✴Day Care ✴Multipurpose Rooms 10 Cascade Village Master Plan. The Broader Vision. IDENTIFIED COMMUNITY NEEDS. 265 •Increase Footfall •Provide Public Parking •Create Retail Activation •Complement Public Transportation •Integrate Public Amenities •Offer Employee Housing •Contribute to Population Growth 11 Cascade Village Master Plan. The Broader Vision. (RE)ACTIVATION OF CASCADE VILLAGE. 266 Gore Creek Westhaven Dr. S Frontage Rd W 12 Cascade Village Master Plan. The Broader Vision. MASTER PLAN. 267 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS. 13 Site Photos. 268 View from the North Site Photos Cornerstone Hotel Liftside CMC 14 Existing Conditions. 269 View from the Frontage Road Site Photos Cornerstone Hotel Liftside CMC 15 Existing Conditions. 270 View from Westhaven Dr. Site Photos Cornerstone Hotel Liftside CMC 16 Existing Conditions. 271 Drop-off Area. Site Photos 17 Existing Conditions. 272 Public Access Stairs Site Photos 18 Existing Conditions. 273 View from Southeast corner. Site Photos 19 Existing Conditions. 274 Hotel Atrium. Site Photos 20 Existing Conditions. 275 EASEMENTS. 21 LOCATIONS & THIRD PARTIES INVOLVED. •Metro District. •ERWDS. •Vail Resorts (Ticketing Office & Public Services) 276 Vicinity Map showing location relative to Public Access Easement on Liftside parcel Vicinity Map. Cornerstone Hotel Liftside Aria CMC 22 LAND TITLE SURVEY. 277 Alta Survey Alta Survey showing EXISTING Public Access Easements and Ticketing Office location. Liftside Lot Ticketing Office Pedestrian Easement Cornerstone Lot Waterline Easement 23 EXISTING EASEMENTS.Electric Easement 278 hv hv W' W' WG WG W/ W/ WM WM WZ WZ a a 9 9 5 5 4 4 W1 W1 W6 W6 W- W- 'W 'W 'G 'G l l 'M 'M W2 W2 K K D D 'Z 'Z '/ '/ '' '' c:4ej c:4ej ,nKK= hie:L4 hie:LK hie:LK 9khL_Lhie:L59khL_Lhie:L5 hie:Lu hie:Lv ,nKK= hie:LD c:4ej 9,9m4:nj c:4ej vhK,e5L9,9m4:nj 9,9m4:nj c:4ej 9,9m4:nj c:4ej nbi9j|cL,nhia9LVL4u9ie:=v,4=4 4' 4A'6 4' 4A'6 DZ 4A'- DZ 4A'-4Z 4A'- 4Z 4A'- 4' 4A'- 4' 4A'- G6|A1B G6|A1B G6|A1B G6|A1B G6|A1B GG|A1B '6|AWB G6|A1B G6|A1B 'Z|A1B '/|AWB 2|A1B G'|AWB 1|A1B 'M | A W B '1 | A W B 'G | A W B 'Z | A W B /|A W B /W | A W B /W/|A1B -W | A W B 'G1|AWB 'G1|AWB 'G1|AWB 9khL_Lhie:L5RG G-W'LKODNHLcWUHHWSLcXLWHL'WW DHQYHUSL5nL6WGWZ /W/R61'R6ZZZ 352 |5)6 6S3 521 7 6LLLLLLL LL in :Lln jL 5n ic :jh 5 : en i Dv4LvURMHFW0 cKHHWLiXPEHU0 cKHHWL:LWOH0 5HYLVLRQV (DWH 1RF 6KHHWS2QIRUPDWLRQ 3URMHFWS2QIRUPDWLRQ 2VVXDQFH (DWH lRQVXOWDQWRVI 'G /M Z 1 'G /M Z 1j9c9jm9DLcv459LlnjL5nich,:4i:c|L,nanc6WDPS 4 K 5 D 9 l 4 K 5 D 9 l 2 2 a a 1 V G 'V G W G M L /0 G 1 0 W /L v u 1V G ' V G W G M L / 0 G 1 0 W / L v u GM-WWRWW 4AWM lc 6 l c ( ) S 9 2 / / c | ) S _ S l 2 5 1 ) 5 6 7 2 1 ) 'G 2 1 L b 9 c : k 4 m 9 i L D j R m4 e , S L 5 n L 6 ' 1 Z 2 nm9j4,,Ll,nnjLv,4iLA ,9m9,Lni9LA v,4=4 WMRG-RGWGMv95LchKue::4, 5nv=jeak:L‹LGWGMLA D4mecLv4j:i9jckevSLvR5R i 'V6BL8L'|AWB5'/)9)/SMSL 29)5c//Sp/225S3/c1SL 3)l W|M|6|'1|/G| c54,90L'V6BL8L'|AWB Access Plaza on Existing Pedestrian Easement Waterline Easement in Relationship to Building Footprint. Paseo Skier Plaza Waterline Easement Pedestrian Easement Plaza Level (Westhaven Dr.). Access Plaza 24 PROJECT AND EXISTING EASMENTS (PEDESTRIAN & WATERLINE INTERACTION 279 Ticketing office, public restrooms and lockers, restaurant and coffee, additional retail (as allowed use) and owner’s lobby. hv W' W' WG WG W/ W/ WM WM WZ WZ a a 9 9 5 5 4 4 W1 W1 W6 W6 W- W- 'W 'W 'G 'G l l 'M 'M W2 W2 K K D D 'Z 'Z '/ '/ '' '' nbi9j|cL,nhia96/2Lclj9:4e,L' u95k4ie54, u95k4ie54, 22MLcl:e5r9:Lnlle59 GZ1WLclj9:4e,L/ 5njjeDnj m9c:eKh,9 vhK,e5L9,9m4:nj bnu9i|cLj9c:jnnuu9i|cLj9c:jnnu G6|A1B G6|A1B G6|A1B G6|A1B G6|A1B GG|A1B '6|AWB G6|A1B G6|A1B 'Z|A1B '/|AWB 2|A1B G'|AWB 1|A1B 'M | A W B '1 | A W B 'G | A W B 'Z | A W B /|A W B /W | A W B 4' 4A'6 4' 4A'6 DZ 4A'- DZ 4A'- 4Z 4A'- 4Z 4A'- 4' 4A'- 4' 4A'- |5c1(SU<c77 lc6lc()S lUc25/2p7 /W/|A1B -W | A W B 5njjeDnj nbi9jLc:nj4a9SL:=vRnbi9jLc:nj4a9SL:=vR u95k4ie54, 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB GG/1Lclj9:4e,LG G-W'LKODNHLcWUHHWSLcXLWHL'WW DHQYHUSL5nL6WGWZ /W/R61'R6ZZZ 352 |5)6 6S3 521 7 6LLLLLLL LL in :Lln jL 5n ic :jh 5 : en i Dv4LvURMHFW0 cKHHWLiXPEHU0 cKHHWL:LWOH0 5HYLVLRQV (DWH 1RF 6KHHWS2QIRUPDWLRQ 3URMHFWS2QIRUPDWLRQ 2VVXDQFH (DWH lRQVXOWDQWRVI 'G /M Z 1 'G /M Z 1j9c9jm9DLcv459LlnjL5nich,:4i:c|L,nanc6WDPS 4 K 5 D 9 l 4 K 5 D 9 l 2 2 a a 1 V G 'V G W G M L /0 G Z 0 Z 2 L v u 1V G ' V G W G M L / 0 G Z 0 Z 2 L v u GM-WWRWW 4AWG lc 6 l c ( ) S 9 2 / / c | ) S _ S l 2 5 1 ) 5 6 7 2 1 ) 'G 2 1 L b 9 c : k 4 m 9 i L D j R m4 e , S L 5 n L 6 ' 1 Z 2 nm9j4,,Ll,nnjLv,4iLA ,9m9,LvGLA v4c9n WMRG-RGWGMv95LchKue::4, 5nv=jeak:L‹LGWGMLA D4mecLv4j:i9jckevSLvR5R i 'V6BL8L'|AWBK'/)9)/S3PSL 29)5c//Sp/225S3/c1SL 3)l W|M|6|'1|/G| c54,90L'V6BL8L'|AWB Restaurant Paseo Skier Plaza Paseo Level (Skier Plaza). Waterline Easement Pedestrian Easement Public Restrooms and Lockers Ticket Office 25 PROJECT AND EXISTING EASMENTS (PEDESTRIAN & WATERLINE) NEW Electric Easement Proposed Location 280 Paseo Level (Skier Plaza). 26 PROJECT AND EXISTING EASMENTS (PEDESTRIAN & WATERLINE) •ELECTRIC EASEMENT (Holy Cross Energy) •Conversations Started •New location proposed •Engineer to be retained (project development) •Work together with HCE to finalize project. •ERWSD •Ability to Serve Application submitted •Ability to Serve Letter (draft in process) •Location of Hydrant Reviewed •Confirmation of Waterline (outside of Easement?) ERWSD to confirm location. •Cascade Village Metro District •Conversations in place •MOU in process to work together for the best outcome of the project. •Vail Resorts •Conversations in place •Response from VR to work through details after PEC. 281 BUILDING SETBACKS. 27 VICINITY COMPARISONS. •Aria Building •CMC •Hotel •Liftside •Westhaven Bldgs. 282 Building Setbacks. 3.5’ 1.5’ 11.7’ 0.0’ 2.0’ 2.0’ 5.0’ 2.0’Aria Westhaven Bldg. CMC Hotel Liftside N 28 VICINITY COMPARISONS. 283 PROJECT COMPARISSON. 29 2008 application 2016-05 Amending Ordinance 5 Series 2008 to Allow for a Major Amendment to Special Development District no. 4 Vail Cascade Subdivisionvs. 2024 application 284 Building Footprint Comparison. UP 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 ELECTRICAL ELEVATOR OWNER'S LOUNGE837 SFRETAIL 1 MECHANICAL MECHANICAL 774 SFTICKET & PATROL OFFICE 2560 SFRETAIL 2 CORRIDOR VESTIBULE PUBLIC ELEVATOR WOMEN'S RESTROOMMEN'S RESTROOM MECHANICAL ELEVATORELEVATOR STAIR 28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"22'-6"18'-0"28'-6"28'-6"15'-6"13'-0"7'-6"21'-0"6'-6" 14 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 3'- 0 " 30 ' - 0 " A1 A-18 A1 A-18 D5 A-19 D5 A-19 A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 GRAND HYATT CASCADE CHAIRLIFT 303'-6" 90 ' - 0 " CORRIDOR OWNER STORAGE, TYP.OWNER STORAGE, TYP. MECHANICAL 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PRO G RE SS P RIN T S NO T FO R CO NS TRU C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 2 :5 9 :3 3 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 2 : 5 9 : 3 3 P M 24900.00 A-02 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL P2 - PASEO 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. N 1/8" = 1'-0"B1 LEVEL P2 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2008 Continuous Ridgeline at 71’ from the Paseo Level. Building footprint goes beyond property line. 2024 View corridor aligns with the existing pedestrian easement Vertical circulation and public plazas are within the existing pedestrian easement Residential footprints stand clear of existing Pedestrian Easement Retail and Owner’s Lobby stand clear of existing Pedestrian Easement. 30 2008 VS 2024. 285 UP 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 ELECTRICAL ELEVATOR OWNER'S LOUNGE837 SFRETAIL 1 MECHANICAL MECHANICAL 774 SFTICKET & PATROL OFFICE 2560 SFRETAIL 2 CORRIDOR VESTIBULE PUBLIC ELEVATOR WOMEN'S RESTROOMMEN'S RESTROOM MECHANICAL ELEVATORELEVATOR STAIR 28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"22'-6"18'-0"28'-6"28'-6"15'-6"13'-0"7'-6"21'-0"6'-6" 14 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 3'- 0 " 30 ' - 0 " A1 A-18 A1 A-18 D5 A-19 D5 A-19 A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 GRAND HYATT CASCADE CHAIRLIFT 303'-6" 90 ' - 0 " CORRIDOR OWNER STORAGE, TYP.OWNER STORAGE, TYP. MECHANICAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UP UP 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 G G E E C C A A 06 06 08 08 09 09 10 10 12 12 F F 14 14 07 07 B B D D 15 15 13 13 11 11 STAIR STAIR LOBBY UNIT A UNIT B UNIT B EHU | UNIT CEHU | UNIT C UNIT M UNIT P LOBBY UNIT D STAIR ELEVATOR STAIR PUBLIC ELEVATOR ELEVATOR STAIR ELEVATOR STAIR OWNER'S LOUNGE / AMENITY PLAZA A1 A-18 A1 A-18 D5 A-19 D5 A-19A5 A-19 A5 A-19 A1 A-19 A1 A-19 28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"22'-6"18'-0"28'-6"28'-6"15'-6"13'-0"7'-6"21'-0"6'-6" 14 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 3'- 0 " 30 ' - 0 " 303'-6" 90 ' - 0 " 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 PRO G RE SS P RIN T S NO T FO R CO NS TRU C T IO N DPA Project: Sheet Number: Sheet Title: Revisions Date No. Sheet Information Project Information Issuance Date Consultant(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6RESERVED SPACE FOR CONSULTANTS' LOGOSStamp A B C D E F A B C D E F 7 7 G G 5 /1 0 /2 0 2 4 1 2 :5 9 :4 1 P M 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 1 2 : 5 9 : 4 1 P M 24900.00 A-04 CA S C A D E V I L L A G E | C O R N E R S T O N E 12 7 6 W E S T H A V E N D R . VA I L , C O 8 1 6 5 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL ONE - PLAZA 04.29.2024PEC SUBMITTAL COPYRIGHT © 2024 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. N 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 LEVEL 1 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - PEC 0'4'8'16'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'32'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 2008 Continuous Ridgeline at 71’ from the Paseo Level. Covered staircase obstructed view corridor. 2024 Vertical circulation and public plazas are within the existing pedestrian easement Residential footprints stand clear of existing Pedestrian Easement 31 Building Footprint Comparison. 2008 VS 2024. 286 T.O.ROOF 197'-0" LEVEL 6 178'-6" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 1 126'-0" LEVEL P1 114'-0" LEVEL P2 100'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 2 136'-6" TOP OF ROOF 171'-0" 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 45 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E U P P E R P L A Z A 71 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E P A S E O 96 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E P A S E O 12,16 10 10 1 88 33 9 5 13 8 7 17 14 13 15 7 3 3 6 8 4 4 17 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 6 " 2 9 2 14 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 0 " 20 20 19 E F G LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL P2 100'-0" T.O.ROOF 197'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 1 126'-0" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 6 178'-6" LEVEL P1 114'-0" 1 13 8 5 10 3 16 6 7 3 10 7 5 3 8 9 9 3 7 99 14 LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 2 136'-6" TOP OF ROOF 171'-0" 45 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E U P P E R P L A Z A 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 71 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E U P P E R P L A Z A 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 17 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 0 " 17 19 19 20 Building Height / Roofline Comparison. 2008 Continuous Ridgeline at 71’ from the Paseo Level. Covered staircase obstructed view corridor. 2024 Playful roofline to mimc the mountain ridge beyond, varies from 68’ to 97' at the highest peak, from the Paseo, which represents 45’ to 74' from the drop-off at Westhaven Drive. Wider View Corridor, aligning 100% to Pedestrian Easement. Plaza Level Westhaven Dr. Drop-off Paseo Level Skier Plaza 97 ’ - 0 ” 71 ’ - 0 ” 26 ’ - 0 ” 45 ’ - 0 ” 26 ’ - 0 ” 97 ’ - 0 ” 71 ’ - 0 ” 26 ’ - 0 ” 45 ’ - 0 ” 26 ’ - 0 ” Plaza Level Westhaven Dr. Drop-off Paseo Level Skier PlazaNorth Elevation (Westhaven Dr.) South Elevation (Paseo) 32 2008 VS 2024. 287 BUILDING HEIGHTS. 33 Vicinity and Relevant Project Comparison. •Liftside 288 Approved Heights of Cornerstone’s Neighboring Buildings. BUILDING 1.Cornerstone Lot 2.Vail Cascade Resort and Spa (Grand Hyatt Vail) 3.CMC Learning Center 4.Cascade Parking Structure/Athletic Club (Aria) 5.Lift side Condominiums 6.Westhaven Building 7.Millrace III & IV 8.Cascade Club Addition 9.Cascade Entry Tower 10.Remainder of area A buildings APPROVED HEIGHT 71’ 71’ 71’ 71’ 65’ 55’ 36’ 26’ 36’ 48’ 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2016-05 Amending Ordinance 5 Series 2008 to Allow for a Major Amendment to Special Development District no. 4 Vail Cascade Subdivision 34 8 289 Building Height. Building Section. Looking West. 96 ’ - 6 ” 54 ’ - 6 ” 86 ’ - 0 ” 44 ’ - 0 ” Westhaven Dr. (Top) Westhaven Dr. (drop-off) 70 ’ - 3 ” 96 ’ - 6 ” 44 ’ - 0 ” 54 ’ - 6 ” 65 ’ - 0 ” 65 ’ - 0 ” 60 ’ - 6 ” ( a p p r o x ) 86 ’ - 0 ” Westhaven Dr. (Top) Westhaven Dr. (drop-off) 60 ’ - 6 ” ( a p p r o x ) 35 LIFTSIDE ROOFLINE. 6’-0” Paseo Level Paseo Level 26 ’ - 0 ” 26 ’ - 0 ” 54 ’ - 6 ” 65 ’ - 0 ” South Elevation (Gore Creek) 290 T.O.ROOF 197'-0" LEVEL 6 178'-6" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 1 126'-0" LEVEL P1 114'-0" LEVEL P2 100'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 2 136'-6" TOP OF ROOF 171'-0" 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 45 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E U P P E R P L A Z A 71 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E P A S E O 96 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E P A S E O 12,16 10 10 1 88 33 9 5 13 8 7 17 14 13 15 7 3 3 6 8 4 4 17 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 6 " 2 9 2 14 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 0 " 20 20 19 E F G LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL P2 100'-0" T.O.ROOF 197'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 2 136'-6" LEVEL 1 126'-0" LEVEL 5 168'-0" LEVEL 6 178'-6" LEVEL P1 114'-0" 1 13 8 5 10 3 16 6 7 3 10 7 5 3 8 9 9 3 7 99 14 LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 2 136'-6" TOP OF ROOF 171'-0" 45 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E U P P E R P L A Z A 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 71 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E U P P E R P L A Z A 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 17 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 12 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 0 " 17 19 19 20 Building Height. Plaza Level Westhaven Dr. Drop-off Paseo Level Skier Plaza 86 ’ - 0 ” 71 ’ - 0 ” 26 ’ - 0 ” 45 ’ - 0 ” 60 ’ - 0 ” 71 ’ - 0 ” 26 ’ - 0 ” 45 ’ - 0 ” Plaza Level Westhaven Dr. Drop-off Paseo Level Skier PlazaNorth Elevation (Westhaven Dr.) South Elevation (Paseo) 97 ’ - 0 ” 26 ’ - 0 ” 26 ’ - 0 ” 36 CORNERSTONE ROOFLINE. 291 Building Height. 37 CORNERSTONE / LIFTSIDE ROOFLINE COMPARISON. Plaza Level - Westhaven Dr. Drop-off Paseo Level 97’-0” 86’-0” 96’-6” 71’-0” 65’-0” 60’-6” 26’-0” 71’-0” 45’-0” 26’-0” 65’-0” South Elevation (Gore Creek) 292 Building Height. T.O.ROOF LEVEL P1 LEVEL P2 LEVEL 4 157'-6" LEVEL 3 147'-0" LEVEL 2 136'-6" TOP OF ROOF 171'-0" 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 45 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E U P P E R P L A Z A 71 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E P A S E O 96 ' - 0 " A B O V E T H E P A S E O 12,16 10 10 1 88 13 8 7 17 3 6 4 4 12 ' - 0 " 20 19 38 CORNERSTONE / LIFTSIDE ROOFLINE COMPARISON. Plaza Level - Westhaven Dr. Drop-off Paseo Level 97’-0” 86’-0” 96’-6” 71’-0” 65’-0” 60’-6” 26’-0” 71’-0” 45’-0” 26’-0” 65’-0” South Elevation (Paseo)South Elevation (Gore Creek) 293 SHADOW STUDY 39 Building Height / Roofline Comparison. 97’ VS. 71’ (from the Paseo Level). For shadow study. •Summer Solstice •Fall / Spring Equinox •Winter Solstice. 294 Building Height / Roofline Comparison. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). For Shadow Study. Plaza Level Westhaven Dr. Drop-off Paseo Level Skier Plaza 97 ’ - 0 ” 71 ’ - 0 ” 26 ’ - 0 ” 45 ’ - 0 ” 26 ’ - 0 ” 97 ’ - 0 ” 71 ’ - 0 ” 26 ’ - 0 ” 45 ’ - 0 ” 26 ’ - 0 ” Plaza Level Westhaven Dr. Drop-off Paseo Level Skier PlazaNorth Elevation (Westhaven Dr.) South Elevation (Paseo) 40 Original Project / Max height (97’) Adjusted Height / Roofline (71’) Original Project / Max height (97’) Adjusted Height / Roofline (71’) 295 SHADOW STUDY. 97’ VS. 71’ (from the Paseo Level) 41 SUMMER SOLSTICE. 9:00 - 18:00 hrs. 296 42 NN SUMMER SOLSTICE (JUNE 21st) Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). 09:00 HRS. 71’ 97’ 297 43 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). 10:00 HRS. SUMMER SOLSTICE (JUNE 21st) 71’ 97’ 298 44 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). 11:00 HRS. SUMMER SOLSTICE (JUNE 21st) 71’ 97’ 299 45 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). 12:00 HRS. SUMMER SOLSTICE (JUNE 21st) 71’ 97’ 300 46 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). 13:00 HRS. SUMMER SOLSTICE (JUNE 21st) 71’ 97’ 301 47 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). 14:00 HRS. SUMMER SOLSTICE (JUNE 21st) 71’ 97’ 302 48 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). 15:00 HRS. SUMMER SOLSTICE (JUNE 21st) 71’ 97’ 303 49 N 16:00 HRS. Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). SUMMER SOLSTICE (JUNE 21st) 71’ 97’ 304 50 N 17:00 HRS. SUMMER SOLSTICE (JUNE 21st) Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). 71’ 97’ 305 51 N 18:00 HRS. Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). SUMMER SOLSTICE (JUNE 21st) 71’ 97’ 306 SHADOW STUDY. 97’ VS. 71’ (from the Paseo Level) 52 SPRING / FALL EQUINOX. 9:00 - 18:00 hrs. 307 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). 53 SPRING / FALL EQUINOX. (MARCH 21st / SEPTEMBER 23rd) 09:00 HRS. 71’ 97’ 308 N 54 10:00 HRS. MARCH 21st.SPRING / FALL EQUINOX. (MARCH 21st / SEPTEMBER 23rd) Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). 71’ 97’ 309 N 55 11:00 HRS. Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). SPRING / FALL EQUINOX. (MARCH 21st / SEPTEMBER 23rd) 71’ 97’ 310 56 N 12:00 HRS. Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). SPRING / FALL EQUINOX. (MARCH 21st / SEPTEMBER 23rd) 71’ 97’ 311 57 N 13:00 HRS. Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). SPRING / FALL EQUINOX. (MARCH 21st / SEPTEMBER 23rd) 71’ 97’ 312 58 N 14:00 HRS. Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). SPRING / FALL EQUINOX. (MARCH 21st / SEPTEMBER 23rd) 71’ 97’ 313 59 N 15:00 HRS. Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). SPRING / FALL EQUINOX. (MARCH 21st / SEPTEMBER 23rd) 71’ 97’ 314 60 N 16:00 HRS. Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). SPRING / FALL EQUINOX. (MARCH 21st / SEPTEMBER 23rd) 71’ 97’ 315 61 N 17:00 HRS. Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). SPRING / FALL EQUINOX. (MARCH 21st / SEPTEMBER 23rd) 71’ 97’ 316 62 N 18:00 HRS. Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). SPRING / FALL EQUINOX. (MARCH 21st / SEPTEMBER 23rd) 71’ 97’ 317 SHADOW STUDY. 97’ VS. 71’ (from the Paseo Level) 63 WINTER SOLSTICE . 9:00 - 18:00 hrs. 318 64 N WINTER SOLSTICE (DECEMBER 21st) Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). 09:00 HRS. 319 65 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). WINTER SOLSTICE (DECEMBER 21st) 10:00 HRS. 320 66 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). WINTER SOLSTICE (DECEMBER 21st) 11:00 HRS. 71’ 97’ 321 67 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). WINTER SOLSTICE (DECEMBER 21st) 12:00 HRS. 71’ 97’ 322 68 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). WINTER SOLSTICE (DECEMBER 21st) 13:00 HRS. 71’ 97’ 323 69 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). WINTER SOLSTICE (DECEMBER 21st) 14:00 HRS. 71’ 97’ 324 70 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). WINTER SOLSTICE (DECEMBER 21st) 15:00 HRS. 71’ 97’ 325 71 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). WINTER SOLSTICE (DECEMBER 21st) 16:00 HRS. 71’ 97’ 326 72 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). WINTER SOLSTICE (DECEMBER 21st) 17:00 HRS. 327 73 N Shadow Study. 97’ vs 71’ (from the Paseo Level). WINTER SOLSTICE (DECEMBER 21st) 18:00 HRS. 328 ARIA PARKING. 74 PARKING SPACE ADJUSTMENTS. 329 75 N ARIA BUILDING - PARKING STRUCTURE. PROPOSED UPDATE TO CONFORMING DIMENSIONS. 330 76 N ARIA BUILDING - PARKING STRUCTURE. PROPOSED UPDATE TO CONFORMING DIMENSIONS. 331 77 N ARIA BUILDING - PARKING STRUCTURE. PROPOSED UPDATE TO CONFORMING DIMENSIONS. 332 PASEO LEVEL USE. 78 RETAIL & OWNER’S LOUNGE ACCESS. 333 Ticketing office, public restrooms and lockers, restaurant and coffee, additional retail (as allowed use) and owner’s lobby. hv W' W' WG WG W/ W/ WM WM WZ WZ a a 9 9 5 5 4 4 W1 W1 W6 W6 W- W- 'W 'W 'G 'G l l 'M 'M W2 W2 K K D D 'Z 'Z '/ '/ '' '' nbi9j|cL,nhia96/2Lclj9:4e,L' u95k4ie54, u95k4ie54, 22MLcl:e5r9:Lnlle59 GZ1WLclj9:4e,L/ 5njjeDnj m9c:eKh,9 vhK,e5L9,9m4:nj bnu9i|cLj9c:jnnuu9i|cLj9c:jnnu G6|A1B G6|A1B G6|A1B G6|A1B G6|A1B GG|A1B '6|AWB G6|A1B G6|A1B 'Z|A1B '/|AWB 2|A1B G'|AWB 1|A1B 'M | A W B '1 | A W B 'G | A W B 'Z | A W B /|A W B /W | A W B 4' 4A'6 4' 4A'6 DZ 4A'- DZ 4A'- 4Z 4A'- 4Z 4A'- 4' 4A'- 4' 4A'- |5c1(SU<c77 lc6lc()S lUc25/2p7 /W/|A1B -W | A W B 5njjeDnj nbi9jLc:nj4a9SL:=vRnbi9jLc:nj4a9SL:=vR u95k4ie54, 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB GG/1Lclj9:4e,LG G-W'LKODNHLcWUHHWSLcXLWHL'WW DHQYHUSL5nL6WGWZ /W/R61'R6ZZZ 352 |5)6 6S3 521 7 6LLLLLLL LL in :Lln jL 5n ic :jh 5 : en i Dv4LvURMHFW0 cKHHWLiXPEHU0 cKHHWL:LWOH0 5HYLVLRQV (DWH 1RF 6KHHWS2QIRUPDWLRQ 3URMHFWS2QIRUPDWLRQ 2VVXDQFH (DWH lRQVXOWDQWRVI 'G /M Z 1 'G /M Z 1j9c9jm9DLcv459LlnjL5nich,:4i:c|L,nanc6WDPS 4 K 5 D 9 l 4 K 5 D 9 l 2 2 a a 1 V G 'V G W G M L /0 G Z 0 Z 2 L v u 1V G ' V G W G M L / 0 G Z 0 Z 2 L v u GM-WWRWW 4AWG lc 6 l c ( ) S 9 2 / / c | ) S _ S l 2 5 1 ) 5 6 7 2 1 ) 'G 2 1 L b 9 c : k 4 m 9 i L D j R m4 e , S L 5 n L 6 ' 1 Z 2 nm9j4,,Ll,nnjLv,4iLA ,9m9,LvGLA v4c9n WMRG-RGWGMv95LchKue::4, 5nv=jeak:L‹LGWGMLA D4mecLv4j:i9jckevSLvR5R i 'V6BL8L'|AWBK'/)9)/S3PSL 29)5c//Sp/225S3/c1SL 3)l W|M|6|'1|/G| c54,90L'V6BL8L'|AWB Restaurant Public Restrooms and Lockers Owner’s LobbyCoffee Shop Residential BOH / Storage Public Access Public Access Owner’s Lounge “New” Retail Paseo Skier Plaza Ticket Office Paseo Level (Skier Plaza). 79 UPDATED PLAN. 334 EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNITS 80 LOCATION AND DISTRIBUTION. 335 Ticketing office, public restrooms and lockers, restaurant and coffee, additional retail and owner’s lobby. hv hv W' W' WG WG W/ W/ WM WM WZ WZ a a 9 9 5 5 4 4 W1 W1 W6 W6 W- W- 'W 'W 'G 'G l l 'M 'M W2 W2 K K D D 'Z 'Z '/ '/ '' '' c:4ej c:4ej ,nKK= hie:L4 hie:LK hie:LK 9khL_Lhie:L59khL_Lhie:L5 hie:Lu hie:Lv ,nKK= hie:LD c:4ej 9,9m4:nj c:4ej vhK,e5L9,9m4:nj 9,9m4:nj c:4ej 9,9m4:nj c:4ej nbi9j|cL,nhia9LVL4u9ie:=v,4=4 4' 4A'6 4' 4A'6 DZ 4A'- DZ 4A'-4Z 4A'- 4Z 4A'- 4' 4A'- 4' 4A'- G6|A1B G6|A1B G6|A1B G6|A1B G6|A1B GG|A1B '6|AWB G6|A1B G6|A1B 'Z|A1B '/|AWB 2|A1B G'|AWB 1|A1B 'M | A W B '1 | A W B 'G | A W B 'Z | A W B /|A W B /W | A W B /W/|A1B -W | A W B 'G1|AWB 'G1|AWB 'G1|AWB 9khL_Lhie:L5RG G-W'LKODNHLcWUHHWSLcXLWHL'WW DHQYHUSL5nL6WGWZ /W/R61'R6ZZZ 352 |5)6 6S3 521 7 6LLLLLLL LL in :Lln jL 5n ic :jh 5 : en i Dv4LvURMHFW0 cKHHWLiXPEHU0 cKHHWL:LWOH0 5HYLVLRQV (DWH 1RF 6KHHWS2QIRUPDWLRQ 3URMHFWS2QIRUPDWLRQ 2VVXDQFH (DWH lRQVXOWDQWRVI 'G /M Z 1 'G /M Z 1j9c9jm9DLcv459LlnjL5nich,:4i:c|L,nanc6WDPS 4 K 5 D 9 l 4 K 5 D 9 l 2 2 a a 1 V G 'V G W G M L /0 G 1 0 W /L v u 1V G ' V G W G M L / 0 G 1 0 W / L v u GM-WWRWW 4AWM lc 6 l c ( ) S 9 2 / / c | ) S _ S l 2 5 1 ) 5 6 7 2 1 ) 'G 2 1 L b 9 c : k 4 m 9 i L D j R m4 e , S L 5 n L 6 ' 1 Z 2 nm9j4,,Ll,nnjLv,4iLA ,9m9,Lni9LA v,4=4 WMRG-RGWGMv95LchKue::4, 5nv=jeak:L‹LGWGMLA D4mecLv4j:i9jckevSLvR5R i 'V6BL8L'|AWB5'/)9)/SMSL 29)5c//Sp/225S3/c1SL 3)l W|M|6|'1|/G| c54,90L'V6BL8L'|AWB In Building - Plaza Level (Westhaven Dr.) RestaurantResidential BOH / Storage Paseo Skier Plaza Residential Units Residential BOH / Common Areas Access Plaza EHU 2EHU 1 Residential Units “New” EHU 81 UPDATED PLAN. 336 CMC Building Lower Level - Under Ownership. Architectural Plans - Lower Level and Mezzanine Floor Plans The CMC Building Lower-Level Employee Housing project is an ambitious transformation of unused space into a vibrant, 6,000-square-foot community-style housing complex. This innovative project will feature brand-new sleeping rooms and common areas, boasting new lighting and modern finishes throughout. Key highlights include the creation of a shared kitchen and laundry room, designed for convenience and community. Existing locker rooms will be updated with contemporary finishes, giving them a fresh, modern look. A new ADA-compliant restroom and shower will enhance accessibility. The design centers around three distinct pods arranged around a communal area. Two pods will feature mezzanines with soaring 15-foot ceilings, while the third will have 12-foot ceilings. Large windows in each pod will flood the rooms with natural light, enhancing the spacious feel. One entire pod will be ADA-accessible, ensuring inclusivity. In total, the project will create 14 sleeping rooms, accommodating up to 25 beds. Each sleeping room will be approximately 160 square feet, designed for comfort and efficiency. The interior finishes will emphasize clean lines and a sleek, modern aesthetic, creating a welcoming environment for all residents. 82 CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION. 337 PUBLIC BENEFIT 83 Landscape Design Signage Pedestrian Connections and Accessibility Paseo Activation Art Program 338 PUBLIC BENEFIT 84 Landscape Design - Project Area 339 Project Roof Plan. Project Area. Landscape Design. 85 340 Roof Plan. Extended area to be enhanced included in Project Proposal. Inside Property Line. Outside Property Line. Landscape Design. 86 341 Landscape Plan hv ,nKK= 9khL_Lhie:L59khL_Lhie:L5 ,nKK= c:4ej 9,9m4:nj c:4ej 9,9m4:nj c:4ej 9,9m4:nj c:4ej nbi9j|cL,nhia9LVL4u9ie:=v,4=4 'G1|AWB 'G1|AWB 9khL_Lhie:L5RG :)67Uc9)1S(5,9) c5,cS|c5c|)/,p76,()Sl21(26 nbi9j|cL,nhia96/2Lclj9:4e,L' 22MLcl:e5r9:Lnlle59 GZ1WLclj9:4e,L/ m9c:eKh,9 vhK,e5L9,9m4:nj bnu9i|cLj9c:jnnuu9i|cLj9c:jnnu |5c1(SU<c77 lc6lc()S lUc,5/,p7 5njjeDnj u95k4ie54, 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB GG/1Lclj9:4e,LG |5c1(SU<c77S uc//5220 G-W'LKODNHLcWUHHWSLcXLWHL'WW DHQYHUSL5nL6WGWZ /W/R61'R6ZZZ 352 |5)66S3 5,1 7 6LLLLLLL LL in :Lln jL 5n ic :jh 5 : en i Dv4LvURMHFW0 cKHHWLiXPEHU0 cKHHWL:LWOH0 5HYLVLRQV (DWH 1RO 6KHHWS,QIRUPDWLRQ 3URMHFWS,QIRUPDWLRQ ,VVXDQFH (DWH lRQVXOWDQWRVI 'G /M Z 1 'G /M Z 1j9c9jm9DLcv459LlnjL5nich,:4i:c|L,nanc6WDPS 4 K 5 D 9 l 4 K 5 D 9 l 2 2 a a 1 V G M V G W G M L 'W 0 G Z 0 /6 L 4 u 1V G M V G W G M L ' W 0 G Z 0 / 6 L 4 u GM-WWRWW 4AW' lc 6 l c ( ) S 9 , / / c | ) S _ S l 2 5 1 ) 5 6 7 2 1 ) 'G 2 1 L b 9 c : k 4 m 9 i L D j R m4 e , S L 5 n L 6 ' 1 Z 2 4j5ke:95:hj4,Lce:9 v,4i WMRG-RGWGMv95LchKue::4, 5nv=jeak:L‹LGWGMLA D4mecLv4j:i9jckevSLvR5R i 'V'1BL8L'|AWB4'c5lU,7)l785c/S6,7)S3/c1 W|M|6|'1|/G| c54,90L'V6BL8L'|AWB Landscape Design. 1 1.On property A.Access plaza B.Lower level plaza2.Landscape/enhancement outside of our property, A.Upper level (pedestrian) B.Drop off (vehicular) C.Paseo D.Skating rink/events lawn 1a 1b 2c 2a 2d 4,430 sf 5,050 sf 2,625 sf 7,200 sf 13,900 sf 6,300 sf 2b Extended Area of Improvements beyond Property Line: +/- 30,000 sf 87 342 PUBLIC BENEFIT 88 Signage - Cascade Village Identity and Way-finding 343 Potential locations. Signage - Cascade Village Identity and Way-finding. 89 344 PUBLIC BENEFIT 90 Pedestrian Connections and Accessibility 345 Vertical and Horizontal Circulations. Vehicular Pedestrian Pedestrian Connections and Accessibility. 91 346 PUBLIC BENEFIT 92 Paseo Activation - Retail and Amenities 347 CAFE, RETAIL, TICKETING OFFICE, RESTAURANT & PUBLIC FACILITIES (Bathrooms and Lockers) SKATING RINK (WINTER) / MULTIPURPOSE LAWN (SUMMER), LANDSCAPING OUTDOOR SEATING / GATHERING, PUBLIC ART AND SCULPTURE OPPORTUNITIES hv ,nKK= 9khL_Lhie:L59khL_Lhie:L5 ,nKK= c:4ej 9,9m4:nj c:4ej 9,9m4:nj c:4ej 9,9m4:nj c:4ej nbi9j|cL,nhia9LVL4u9ie:=v,4=4 'G1|AWB 'G1|AWB 9khL_Lhie:L5RG :)67Uc9)1S(5,9) c5,cS|c5c|)/,p76,()Sl21(26 nbi9j|cL,nhia96/2Lclj9:4e,L' 22MLcl:e5r9:Lnlle59 GZ1WLclj9:4e,L/ m9c:eKh,9 vhK,e5L9,9m4:nj bnu9i|cLj9c:jnnuu9i|cLj9c:jnnu |5c1(SU<c77 lc6lc()S lUc,5/,p7 5njjeDnj u95k4ie54, 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB GG/1Lclj9:4e,LG |5c1(SU<c77S uc//5220 G-W'LKODNHLcWUHHWSLcXLWHL'WW DHQYHUSL5nL6WGWZ /W/R61'R6ZZZ 352 |5)66S3 5,1 7 6LLLLLLL LL in :Lln jL 5n ic :jh 5 : en i Dv4LvURMHFW0 cKHHWLiXPEHU0 cKHHWL:LWOH0 5HYLVLRQV (DWH 1RO 6KHHWS,QIRUPDWLRQ 3URMHFWS,QIRUPDWLRQ ,VVXDQFH (DWH lRQVXOWDQWRVI 'G /M Z 1 'G /M Z 1j9c9jm9DLcv459LlnjL5nich,:4i:c|L,nanc6WDPS 4 K 5 D 9 l 4 K 5 D 9 l 2 2 a a 1 V G M V G W G M L 'W 0 G Z 0 /6 L 4 u 1V G M V G W G M L ' W 0 G Z 0 / 6 L 4 u GM-WWRWW 4AW' lc 6 l c ( ) S 9 , / / c | ) S _ S l 2 5 1 ) 5 6 7 2 1 ) 'G 2 1 L b 9 c : k 4 m 9 i L D j R m4 e , S L 5 n L 6 ' 1 Z 2 4j5ke:95:hj4,Lce:9 v,4i WMRG-RGWGMv95LchKue::4, 5nv=jeak:L‹LGWGMLA D4mecLv4j:i9jckevSLvR5R i 'V'1BL8L'|AWB4'c5lU,7)l785c/S6,7)S3/c1 W|M|6|'1|/G| c54,90L'V6BL8L'|AWB Retail-Lined Paseo Seating Retail Retail Skating rink/ Gathering Existing Retail Retail Public Facilities Ticketing Offices 93 348 PUBLIC BENEFIT 94 Art Program 349 Art Program hv ,nKK= 9khL_Lhie:L59khL_Lhie:L5 ,nKK= c:4ej 9,9m4:nj c:4ej 9,9m4:nj c:4ej 9,9m4:nj c:4ej nbi9j|cL,nhia9LVL4u9ie:=v,4=4 'G1|AWB 'G1|AWB 9khL_Lhie:L5RG :)67Uc9)1S(5,9) c5,cS|c5c|)/,p76,()Sl21(26 nbi9j|cL,nhia96/2Lclj9:4e,L' 22MLcl:e5r9:Lnlle59 GZ1WLclj9:4e,L/ m9c:eKh,9 vhK,e5L9,9m4:nj bnu9i|cLj9c:jnnuu9i|cLj9c:jnnu |5c1(SU<c77 lc6lc()S lUc,5/,p7 5njjeDnj u95k4ie54, 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB'WW|AWB 'WW|AWB GG/1Lclj9:4e,LG |5c1(SU<c77S uc//5220 G-W'LKODNHLcWUHHWSLcXLWHL'WW DHQYHUSL5nL6WGWZ /W/R61'R6ZZZ 352 |5)66S3 5,1 7 6LLLLLLL LL in :Lln jL 5n ic :jh 5 : en i Dv4LvURMHFW0 cKHHWLiXPEHU0 cKHHWL:LWOH0 5HYLVLRQV (DWH 1RO 6KHHWS,QIRUPDWLRQ 3URMHFWS,QIRUPDWLRQ ,VVXDQFH (DWH lRQVXOWDQWRVI 'G /M Z 1 'G /M Z 1j9c9jm9DLcv459LlnjL5nich,:4i:c|L,nanc6WDPS 4 K 5 D 9 l 4 K 5 D 9 l 2 2 a a 1 V G M V G W G M L 'W 0 G Z 0 /6 L 4 u 1V G M V G W G M L ' W 0 G Z 0 / 6 L 4 u GM-WWRWW 4AW' lc 6 l c ( ) S 9 , / / c | ) S _ S l 2 5 1 ) 5 6 7 2 1 ) 'G 2 1 L b 9 c : k 4 m 9 i L D j R m4 e , S L 5 n L 6 ' 1 Z 2 4j5ke:95:hj4,Lce:9 v,4i WMRG-RGWGMv95LchKue::4, 5nv=jeak:L‹LGWGMLA D4mecLv4j:i9jckevSLvR5R i 'V'1BL8L'|AWB4'c5lU,7)l785c/S6,7)S3/c1 W|M|6|'1|/G| c54,90L'V6BL8L'|AWB Art Program 1.Drop-off Round About 2.Access Plaza 3.Skier Plaza 4.Skating Rink / Hotel Atrium 5.Hotel Drop-off Area 2 5 4 1 3 95 350 351 Date:August 6, 2024 Submitted To: Parks Hospitality Holdings c/o Alonso Ruiz de Valasco Submitted By: Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC 1580 Logan Street, 6th Floor Denver, CO 80203 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt Vail Traffic Impact Study 352 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page i August 6, 2024  TABLE OF CONTENTS  1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1  2.0 Project Description .................................................................................................................. 1  3.0 Study Considerations ............................................................................................................... 1  3.1 Data Collection .................................................................................................................... 1  3.2 Evaluation Methodology ..................................................................................................... 2  3.3 Level of Service Definitions ................................................................................................. 2   4.0 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................. 3  4.1 Roadways ............................................................................................................................ 3  4.2 Intersections ....................................................................................................................... 3  4.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities ......................................................................................... 3  4.4 Transit ................................................................................................................................. 4  4.5 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis ............................................................................... 5  5.0 Future Traffic Conditions ......................................................................................................... 5  5.1 Annual Growth Factor and Future Volume Methodology .................................................. 5  5.2 Year 2027 Background Intersection Capacity Analysis ....................................................... 5  5.3 Year 2045 Background Intersection Capacity Analysis ....................................................... 6  6.0 Proposed Development Traffic ................................................................................................ 6  6.1 Trip Generation ................................................................................................................... 6  6.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment ....................................................................................... 8  7.0 Future Traffic Conditions with Site Development ..................................................................... 9  7.1 Year 2027 Background + Project Intersection Capacity Analysis ........................................ 9  7.2 Year 2045 Background + Project Intersection Capacity Analysis ........................................ 9  8.0 Sensitivity Analysis ................................................................................................................ 10  9.0 Auxiliary Lane Evaluation ....................................................................................................... 10  10.0 CDOT Access Permit ............................................................................................................... 11  11.0 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 12    353 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page ii August 6, 2024    LIST OF TABLES  Table 1 – Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Summary...................................................................... 13  Table 2 – Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue Summary ................................................................................ 14  Table 3 – Trip Generation Summary ........................................................................................................... 15  Table 4 – Trip Distribution Summary ............................................................................................................ 8  Table 5 – Auxiliary Lane Evaluation of S. Frontage Road at Westhaven Drive ........................................... 11    LIST OF FIGURES  Figure 1 – Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................................... 16  Figure 2 – Conceptual Site Plan .................................................................................................................. 17  Figure 3 – Year 2024 Existing Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................ 18  Figure 4 – Year 2027 Background Traffic Volumes ..................................................................................... 19  Figure 5 – Year 2045 Background Traffic Volumes ..................................................................................... 20  Figure 6 – Trip Distribution  ........................................................................................................................ 21  Figure 7 – Site‐Generated Trips .................................................................................................................. 22  Figure 8 – Year 2027 Background + Project Traffic Volumes ...................................................................... 23  Figure 9 – Year 2045 Background + Project Traffic Volumes ...................................................................... 24     APPENDIX  Existing Traffic Data  Level of Service Definitions  Intersection Capacity Worksheets  Sensitivity Analysis  354 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 August 6, 2024    CORNERSTONE GRAND HYATT VAIL  TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY  1.0 INTRODUCTION  The Fox Tuttle Transportation Group prepared this traffic impact study for the proposed Cornerstone  Grand Hyatt project in Vail, CO. The project proposes to construct one (1) building that will include multi‐ family housing, workforce housing, and commercial space for retail or office needs. The site is located in  West  V ail  on  Westhaven  Drive  just  s outh  o f  S. F rontage  Road  i n  the vacant lot adjacent to the Grand Hyatt.  Figure 1 includes a vicinity map for the proposed Cornerstone development.  The purpose of this study is to assist in identifying potential t raffic  impacts  within  t he  s tudy  a rea  as  a r esult   of this project. The traffic study addresses existing, short‐term (Year 2027), and long‐term (Year 2045)  peak hour intersection conditions in the study area with and without the project generated traffic. The  information contained in this study is anticipated to be used by the Town of Vail staff and the Colorado  Department of Transportation (CDOT) staff in identifying any intersection or roadway deficiencies and  potential improvements for the future conditions. This study focused on the weekday AM and PM peak  hours, as well as the Saturday peak hour, which are typically the highest traffic volumes for the proposed  type of land use. The study includes an assessment of queue lengths and auxiliary lane needs.  2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION  The project proposes to construct a single building that will include 30 multi‐family units, three (3)  workforce units, and 4,170 square feet of commercial space. The project plans to provide access into the  parking garage via Westhaven Drive. The driveway will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane  with side‐street stop‐controlled. Figure 2 includes a conceptual site plan and access for the project.  3.0 STUDY CONSIDERATIONS  3.1 Data Collection   Intersection turning movement volumes were collected in July 2024 on a Friday and Saturday during peak  periods. The only study intersection included was S. Frontage Road at Westhaven Drive, which is the  primary access to the Grand Hyatt and Cascade Village neighborhood. The data indicated that the Friday  355 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 2 August 6, 2024  morning peak starts at 10:30am, the Friday afternoon peak starts at 4:30pm, and the Saturday peak starts  at 11:00pm. Additionally, the Town of Vail staff provided count d ata at  the s tudy i ntersection  from Friday,  December 31, 2021, for comparisons to winter and holiday travel. A comparison of data sets indicated  that the winter season had 25% more traffic in the weekday AM peak hour and 50% more traffic in the  weekday PM peak hour. Therefore, both sets of traffic data were analyzed in this study to determine the  different intersection performance based on season.   The existing summer and winter traffic volumes are illustrated on Figure 3. The existing intersection  geometry and traffic control are also shown on this figure. Count data  sheets are  provided in the  Appendix.   3.2 Evaluation Methodology  The traffic operations analysis addressed the unsignalized intersection operations using the procedures  and methodologies set forth by the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)1. Existing Peak Hour Factor (PHF)  were  a pplied  to  t he  i ntersections  f or  t he  existing  and  future  s cenarios. Study intersections were evaluated  using Synchro software.   3.3 Level of Service Definitions   A level of service analysis was conducted to determine the existing and future performance of the study  intersections and to determine the most appropriate traffic control device and need for auxiliary lanes.   To measure and describe the operational status of the study intersections, transportation engineers and  planners commonly use a grading system referred to as “Level of Service” (LOS) that is defined by the  HCM. LOS characterizes the operational conditions of an intersection’s traffic flow, ranging from LOS A  (indicating very good, free flow operations) and LOS F (indicating congested and sometimes oversaturated  conditions). These grades represent the perspective of drivers and are an indication of the comfort and  convenience associated with traveling through the intersections. The intersection LOS is represented as a  delay in seconds per vehicle for the intersection as a whole and for each turning movement. A more  detailed discussion of the LOS methodology is contained in the Appendix for reference.   Typically, LOS A through C to be good for the overall intersection operations with LOS D as acceptable in  peak hours. For individual movements, LOS E and F may be acceptable for left‐turns or minor streets  where queuing or safety are not an issue.   1 Highway Capacity Manual, Highway Research Board Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, National  Research Council, 7th Edition (2022).   356 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 3 August 6, 2024  4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS  4.1 Roadways  The study area boundaries are based on the amount of traffic to be generated by the project and potential  impact to the existing roadway network. The primary public roadways that serve the project site are  discussed in the following text and illustrated on Figure 1.  South Frontage Road W is an east‐west, two‐lane collector that parallels I‐70 on the south side  on the interstate. This roadway provides access to the ski resort and the heart of Vail, as well as  East  V ail  and  West  V ail. The  posted  speed limit  on  S outh  Fronta ge Road is 25 miles per hour (mph)  and the roadway currently services approximately 6,360 vehicles per day (vpd) on a weekday and  approximately 5,240 vpd on Saturday.   Westhaven Drive is a local roadway that provides direct access to the Grand Hyatt and Cascade  Village neighborhood. The two‐lane roadway provides auxiliary lanes at the intersection with S.  Frontage Road. The posted speed limit on Westhaven Drive  is  15 mph and  it services  approximately 2,200 vpd on the weekday and 1,900 vpd on Saturday.   4.2 Intersections  The  study area includes  one  (1) intersection, which  is S. Frontage  Road at  Westhaven  Drive. This  intersection currently provides the following auxiliary lanes and traffic control:   Side‐street stop control (Westhaven Drive)   Eastbound Approach: One through lane, one right‐turn deceleration lane, and one right‐turn  acceleration lane.    Westbound  Approach: One through lane,  one  left‐turn deceleration  lane,  and  one left‐turn  acceleration lane.   Northbound Approach: One left‐turn lane and one right‐turn lane.   The existing lane configuration at each of the study locations is illustrated on Figure 3.   4.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities  There is currently a wide sidewalk on the south side of S. Frontage Road to the east. There is a sidewalk  on the north side of Westhaven Drive. The Gore Valley Trail parallels the creek along the south side of the  Grand Hyatt, which runs the length of Vail. The Gore Valley Trail is part of the Eagle County Core Trail  System which leads over Vail Pass into Copper and Frisco to the east and connects to Eagle/Gypsum to  the west. In both directions the trail continues onto Breckenridge (southeast) and to Glenwood Springs  (west).   357 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 4 August 6, 2024  The study roadways permit bicyclists to ride on the Gore Valley Trail or on‐street within the shoulder or  travel lane. The S. Frontage Road is highly utilized by cyclists for commuting trips and recreational trips.   4.4 Transit   The Town of Vail is served by Vail Transit and during the summer months there are two (2) bus routes that  stop in front of the proposed Cornerstone project. The West Vail Green and West Vail Red routes turn  onto Westhaven Drive, turn around in the elbow, and pick‐up/drop‐off passengers in from the Liftside  Condos. There is a median‐separated bus lane on the east side of Westhaven Drive for the Cascade Village  stop as shown on Map 1.   Map 1. West Vail Green and Red Routes  The West Vail Green route operates from 6:00AM to 12:00 AM with headways of approximately 40  minutes. The West Vail Red route operates from 6:20AM to 1:20 AM with headways of approximately 40  minutes. Both routes connect to the Vail Transportation Center where patrons can transfer to other local  or regional routes.   Eco Transit is the countywide transportation service provider that connects Dotsero to Vail and all the  communities in between. The Leadville Route and the Highway 6 Route travel on S. Frontage Road with a  stop to the east of Westhaven Drive  358 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 5 August 6, 2024  4.5 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis  The existing volumes, lane configuration, and traffic control are illustrated on Figure 3. The results of the  LOS calculations for the study intersections are summarized in Table 1. The 95th percentile queues are  summarized in Table 2. The intersection level of service worksheets and queue reports are attached in  the Appendix.   The intersection of S. Frontage Road at Westhaven Drive currently operates overall at LOS A in the peak  periods in both seasons with all movements operating at LOS C or better. The highest delay was shown  on the northbound left‐turn (Westhaven Drive) during the PM peak hour in the winter season (17 seconds,  LOS C). The 95th percentile queues at the study intersections were estimated to be maintained within the  provided storage length and not extending to upstream intersections. The queues on Westhaven Drive  were estimated to be one vehicle or less during all peak periods and seasons.   5.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS  5.1 Annual Growth Factor and Future Volume Methodology  West Vail is well established, and redevelopment is not occurring  at the same  rate that is occurring in M id  Valley. Most growth will occur from additional tourists or redevelopment of existing parcels. For the  purpose of this traffic study, historical counts were reviewed from CDOT, Eagle County, and Town of Vail,  as well as Census Data for Vail. Based on this data, it is assumed there will be an annual growth rate of  1.0% on the through movements on S. Frontage Road and 0% on to/from Westhaven Drive.   Using these assumptions, the Year 2027 background traffic is summarized on Figure 4 and the Year 2045  background traffic is summarized on Figure 5.   5.2 Year 2027 Background Intersection Capacity Analysis  The study area intersections  were evaluated to determine baseline operations  for the  Year 2027  background scenario and to identify any capacity constraints associated with background traffic. The  short‐term background volumes, lane configuration, and traffic control are illustrated on Figure 4.  The level of service criteria discussed previously was applied to the study intersections to determine the  impacts with the short‐term (Year 2027) background volumes. The results of the LOS calculations for the  study intersection are summarized in Table 1. The 95th percentile queues are summarized in Table 2. The  intersection level of service worksheets and queue reports are attached in the Appendix.     359 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 6 August 6, 2024  In summary, the intersection of S. Frontage Road at Westhaven Drive was estimated to operate similarly  to the existing conditions. Overall, the intersection was calculated to operate at LOS A in all peak hours  and both seasons. The winter PM peak hour continues to experience the highest delay on the northbound  left‐turn. The 95th percentile queues were estimated to continue to be one vehicle or less during all study  periods and be maintained within existing storage lengths.  5.3 Year 2045 Background Intersection Capacity Analysis   The study area intersections  were evaluated to determine baseline operations  for the  Year 2045  background scenario and to identify any capacity constraints associated with background traffic. The long‐ term background volumes, lane configuration, and traffic control are illustrated on Figure 5.  The level of service criteria discussed previously was applied to the study area intersections to determine  the impacts with the long‐term (Year 2045) background volumes. The results of the LOS calculations for  the study intersection are summarized in Table 1. The 95th percentile queues are summarized in Table 2.  The intersection level of service worksheets and queue reports are attached in the Appendix.   In summary, the study intersection will operate similarly to the existing and short‐term background  conditions. Delays were insignificantly increased (one second or less) with the most changes on the  northbound left‐turn movement that will continue to operate at LOS C in the winter PM peak hour and  begin to operate at LOS C in the winter AM peak hour. The 95th percentile queues were calculated to be  similar to existing and short‐term background conditions with some increasing by one (1) vehicle for a  total of two (2) vehicles or less.   6.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC  6.1 Trip Generation  A trip generation estimate was performed to determine the traffic characteristics of the Cornerstone  housing and retail project. The trip rates contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip  Generation Manual2 for land uses #221 “Multi‐Family Housing (Mid‐Rise)”, #223 “Affordable Housing,  Income Limits”, #822 “Strip Retail Plaza (<40k), and #936 “Coffee/Donut Shop without Drive‐Through”  were applied to estimate the proposed traffic. The commercial spaces are going to be for local businesses  that will attract those living in or visiting West Vail.   2 Trip Generation 11th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021.  360 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 7 August 6, 2024  The site is expected to experience the four (4) basic trip types as discussed below:  Primary Trips. These trips are made specifically to visit the site and are considered “new” trips.  Primary trips would not have been made if the proposed project did not exist. Therefore, this is  the only trip type that increases the total number of trips made on a regional basis. It is expected  that the proposed project will experience mostly primary trips.   Pass‐By Trips. A pass‐by trip is an intermediate stop on route from an origin to the ultimate trip  destination without route diversion. These are drivers that already utilize the adjacent roadways  and choose to make a stop within the site and then continue to their destination. Pass‐by trips do  not create any increase in the traffic volumes within the primary impact area. In fact, the only  impact of the pass‐by trips is at the site driveways and adjacent intersections where through  movements become turning movements into and out of the site. Therefore, pass‐by trips have no  additional impact  on the road  system beyond  the  site’s driveways  or immediately adjacent  intersections. With or without pass‐by trips, the total trips to/from a project will remain the same.  Pass‐by was only applied to the commercial retail portion of the project. Per ITE data, the pass‐by  percentage for retail is 40% in the PM peak hour and 31% in the Saturday peak hour. For pass‐by  trips, the methodology set forth in the Trip Generation Manual (Chapter 10) was utilized.   Multi‐Use (Internal) Trips. These internal trips occur from one land use to another within the site  boundaries. Multi‐use or multi‐purpose trips typically do not affect  t he  e xterior site  a ccess  points,  nor add any additional traffic volumes to the adjacent street network. ITE recommends that the  internal capture calculations  be conducted with the methodology presented in National  Cooperative Highway Research Program’s (NCHRP) Report 684: Enhancing Internal Trip Capture  Estimation for Mixed‐Use Developments3 which were utilized in this traffic study. Based on this  methodology, it was calculated that the morning peak hour will have an internal capture rate of  2% and the evening peak hour will have an internal capture rate of 26%, which were applied to  the trip estimate. Non‐Auto Trips. These trips are those that are completed by walking, bicycling, or riding transit.  The existing transit, pedestrian, and bicycle amenities will encourage residents, employees, and  visitors to make non‐auto trips to/from the Cornerstone project. For conservative purposes it was  assumed that 0% of the residential and retail trips would be non‐auto, and 25% of the coffee shop  3 NCHRP Report 684: Enhancing Internal Trip Capture Estimation for Mixed‐Use Developments. Bochner, B., K. Hooper, B.  Sperry, and R. Dunphy. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 2011. 361 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 8 August 6, 2024  trips would be non‐auto. It is likely that there will be residents and visitors that walk, bike, or use  transit due to the proximity to multi‐modal options.   The trip generation estimates using these rates are summarized in Table 3. It is projected that the  Cornerstone development will generate approximately 580 vehicle trips per day, with 78 trips occurring  in the morning peak hour and 47 trips occurring in the PM peak hour. Of the weekday PM peak trips,  approximately  6% are pass‐by trips. On  Saturday,  it  was  estimated  that  the  project  will  generate  approximately 396 trips per day with 74 trips occurring in the peak period. It is likely that the peak hour  of the residential and commercial portions of the project on the weekend are different from one another  and possibly different from the roadways; however, for conservative purposes in this traffic study, it was  assumed that the peak hours of the proposed land uses and roadways coincided.   6.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment  The estimated trip volumes presented in Table 3 w ere distributed onto the study roadway network based  on existing traffic characteristics of the area, existing and future land uses, and the relationship of this  project to the greater Hayden community. Based on existing count data, it was determined that each peak  hour has different travel patterns and those were applied to the Cornerstone trips. The overall assumed  distribution is summarized in Table 4 and on Figure 6.   Table 4. Trip Distribution Summary  Location AM Peak  Hour  PM Peak  Hour  Saturday  Peak Hour  Pass‐by  Trips  West S. Frontage Road   55% 50% 40% 50%  East S. Frontage Road   45% 50% 60% 50%  Using these distribution assumptions, the projected site traffic was assigned to the study area roadway  network and proposed access for the weekday AM and PM peak hour periods a nd  Saturday Mid‐day peak  hour. The site‐generated volumes for both seasons are shown on Figure 7.    362 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 9 August 6, 2024  7.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH SITE DEVELOPMENT   This section projects the future traffic conditions with the completion of the proposed Cornerstone  project.   7.1 Year 2027 Background + Project Intersection Capacity Analysis  This section discusses impacts associated with the proposed Cornerstone trips in the build out scenario  with the project fully built out and occupied. The site‐generated volumes were added to the forecasted  Year 2027 background volumes and are illustrated on Figure 8. The results of the LOS calculations for the  study intersection are summarized in Table 1. The 95th percentile queues are summarized in Table 2. The  intersection level of service worksheets and queue reports are attached in the Appendix.   The project trips have little to no impact on the operations of the study intersections as compared to  the short‐term background scenario. All of the overall levels of service and the majority of movements  remain the same. The additional trips on the northbound left‐turn at the intersection of S. Frontage Road  and Westhaven Drive slightly increased the delay (1.4 seconds) of the movement with a change from LOS  B to LOS C in the winter AM peak hour. The 95th percentile queues were estimated to be two (2) vehicles  or less with a five‐foot increase on the northbound left‐turn movement in the winter PM peak hour.   7.2 Year 2045 Background + Project Intersection Capacity Analysis  This section discusses impacts associated with the proposed Cornerstone trips in the build out scenario  with the project fully built out and fully occupied. The site‐generated volumes were added to the  forecasted Year  2045 background volumes and are  illustrated  on Figure  9. The results of the LOS  calculations for the study intersection  are summarized in Table  1. The 95th percentile queues are  summarized in Table 2. The intersection level of service worksheets and queue reports are attached in  the Appendix.   The project trips have little to no impact on the operations of the study intersections as compared to  the long‐term background scenario. All of the overall levels of service and all of movements remain the  same grade. The additional trips on the northbound left‐turn at the intersection of S. Frontage Road and  Westhaven Drive slightly increased the delay (1.4 seconds) of the movement with a change from LOS B to  LOS C in the winter AM peak hour. The 95th percentile queues were estimated to remain two (2) vehicles  or less with a seven‐foot increase on the northbound left‐turn movement in the winter PM peak hour.     363 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 10 August 6, 2024  8.0 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS   It is understood that there is potential for the S. Frontage Road to be redesigned in the future to  accommodate multi‐modal facilities, which could include repurposing the eastbound auxiliary lanes. This  analysis removed the eastbound right‐turn lane and the acceleration lanes. The purpose of this analysis is  to provide additional information for the Town of Vail staff as they continue to investigate the needs on  S. Frontage Road for all people driving, walking, biking, wheeling, and using transit.   The results of the LOS calculations for the sensitivity analysis of the intersection of S. Frontage Road at  Westhaven Drive are summarized in Table A1 a nd  located  in the  Appendix. The 95th percentile queues for  the sensitivity analysis are summarized in Table A2. The intersection level of service worksheets and  queue reports are attached in the Appendix.  The analysis indicated that the removal of the eastbound auxiliary lanes is anticipated to slightly increase  the delays and queues on the Westhaven Drive movements since those turning onto S. Frontage Road  have more difficulty deciphering which eastbound vehicles are travel through or turning right.   The most impacted movement is the northbound left‐turn with an increase in delay up to 19 seconds in  the Year 2045 Project scenario during the winter PM peak hour. The added delay on this movement was  calculated to change the level of service from LOS C to LOS E. In the same scenario, the 95th percentile  queue on the northbound left‐turn was estimated to be increased by 30 feet and extend to a total of 65  feet. This queue will block access to the northbound right‐turn lane, which could be accommodated with  redesign of the median for the transit stop.   It should be noted that the removal of the eastbound right‐turn acceleration lane did not change the  calculated performance since there is an existing stop sign that drivers are expected to obey before  proceeding into the acceleration lane. If the existing northbound right‐turn were allowed to freely turn  into the eastbound right‐turn acceleration lane, then the analysis would calculate the delay as zero (0)  seconds.   9.0 AUXILIARY LANE EVALUATION  The Town of Vail indicated that S. Frontage Road is maintained and operated by CDOT, which requires  compliance with the current State Highway Access Code4 auxiliary lane criteria. The purpose of the criteria  is to enhance safety and access along state facilities. The impacted auxiliary lane lengths on S. Frontage  Road at Westhaven Drive were reviewed to determine if the CDOT criteria is met. S. Frontage Road is not  4 State Highway Access Code, State of Colorado, August 31, 1998, updated March 2002. 364 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 11 August 6, 2024  listed in the CDOT classification document; therefore, it was assumed that the roadway is classified as F‐ R (Frontage Road). The posted speed limit is 25 mph within the study area. Per the State Highway Access  Code requirements, a right‐turn deceleration lane is required if the volume is greater than 50 vph. A left‐ turn deceleration lane is required if the turning volume is greater than 25 vph. A warranted deceleration  length is required to be a total length including the storage and taper (ratio of 7.5:1). Acceleration lanes  are not typically warranted on roadways with 25 mph but are allowed to be constructed if it helps the  traffic operations; in which case the right‐turning would need to be greater than 50 vph.  Table 5 provides the existing and future volumes, criteria, and CDOT design lengths requirements. The  listed movements serve the proposed project site and the peak hour volumes for existing, and future were  reviewed to determine the compliance with the required auxiliary lane lengths.  Table 5. Auxiliary Lane Evaluation of S. Frontage Road at Westhaven Drive  Movement  Highest Peak Hour  Volume   (vehicle per hour)  Criteria  Met?  CDOT Design Criteria  Storage  Length  Taper   Length (1)  Total Auxiliary  Lane Length  EB Right  Deceleration  71  Yes  75 ft  (ex. = 260 ft)  100 ft  (ex. = 145 ft)  175 ft  (ex. = 405 ft)  EB Right  Acceleration  66  Not  Req.  n/a  (ex. = 350 ft)  n/a  (ex. = 160 ft)  n/a  (ex. = 510 ft)  WB Left  Deceleration  88  Yes  100 ft  (ex. = 245 ft)  100 ft  (ex. = 80 ft)  200 ft  (ex. = 325 ft)  WB Left  Acceleration  90  Not  Req.  n/a  (ex. = 180 ft)  n/a  (ex. = 230 ft)  n/a  (ex. = 410 ft)  (1) The taper length is included in the deceleration length and the existing lane widths are 13 feet.  As shown in Table 5, the project trips are above the criteria for providing eastbound right‐turn lane and  westbound left‐turn, which are already provided. The existing acceleration lanes are not warranted based  on the CDOT criteria, but likely improve operations for side‐street drivers entering S. Frontage Road.   10.0 CDOT ACCESS PERMIT  CDOT requires an access permit when the side‐street volume increases the permitted volume by 20% or  more. The new trips accessing S. Frontage Road will add approximately 78 vehicles in the AM peak hour,  47 vehicles in the PM peak hour, and 74 vehicles in the Saturday peak hour. The percentage increase on  Westhaven Drive is between 23% and 35%, which will require an Access Permit. This will be provided at a  later date with the final submittal package.     365 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 12 August 6, 2024  11.0 CONCLUSION  The Cornerstone development project proposes constructing 30 multi‐family homes, three (3) workforce  housing units, and approximately 4,170 square feet of ground‐floor retail. Access to  the site is planned on  Westhaven Drive with full movement, side‐street stop‐control.   Vehicular traffic volumes associated with the Cornerstone project have been analyzed for the existing,  short‐term (Year 2027), and long‐term (Year 2045) scenarios. Using ITE trip generation rates, the project  is anticipated to generate approximately 580 daily, 78 AM peak hour and 47 PM peak hour trips at buildout  during the weekday with up to 6% of the PM peak trips being pass‐by trips. On Saturday, it was estimated  that the project will generate up to 396 trips per day with 74 trips occurring in the peak period with 7% as  pass‐by trips. It was determined that the existing roadways can accommodate the estimated traffic  volumes for the buildout condition of Cornerstone at Grand Hyatt Vail. No capacity deficiencies were  identified therefore no mitigation measures are recommended.   366 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC August 6, 2024      Tables and Figures:  Table 1 – Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Summary  Table 2 – Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue Summary  Table 3 – Trip Generation Summary  Table 4 – Trip Distribution Summary [IN REPORT]  Table 5 – Auxiliary Lane Evaluation of S. Frontage Road at Westhaven Drive [IN REPORT]    Figure 1 – Vicinity Map  Figure 2 – Conceptual Site Plan   Figure 3 – Year 2024 Existing Traffic Volumes  Figure 4 – Year 2027 Background Traffic Volumes  Figure 5 – Year 2045 Background Traffic Volumes  Figure 6 –Trip Distribution   Figure 7 – Site‐Generated Trips  Figure 8 – Year 2027 Background + Project Traffic Volumes  Figure 9 – Year 2045 Background + Project Traffic Volumes     367 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt ‐ Vail, CO  (FT# 24056) Traffic Impact Analysis                   Intersection and  Lanes Groups Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Stop‐Controlled ‐ Summer 1. S. Frontage Road at  Westhaven Drive 3A2A2A3A2A2A4A3A3A3A2A2A3A3A3A    Eastbound Through 0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A    Eastbound Right 0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A    Westbound Left 8A8A8A8A8A8A8A8A8A8A8A8A8A8A8A Westbound Through 0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A   Northbound Left 12 B 13 B 12 B 12 B 13 B 12 B 13 B 13 B 12 B 13 B 14 B 12 B 13 B 14 B 13 B   Northbound Right 10 B 10 A 10 B 10 B 10 A 10 B 10 B 10 B 11 B 11 B 10 B 11 B 11 B 10 B 11 B Stop‐Controlled ‐ Winter 1. S. Frontage Road at  Westhaven Drive 3A3A 3A3A 4A4A 4A3A 2A3A    Eastbound Through 0A0A 0A0A 0A0A 0A0A 0A0A    Eastbound Right 0A0A 0A0A 0A0A 0A0A 0A0A    Westbound Left 9A8A 9A8A 9A8A 9A8A 9A9A Westbound Through 0A0A 0A0A 0A0A 0A0A 0A0A   Northbound Left 14 B 17 C 14 B 17 C 15 C 18 C 17 C 19 C 15 C 21 C   Northbound Right 12 B 11 B 12 B 11 B 12 B 11 B 14 B 11 B 13 B 11 B Note:  Delay represented in average seconds per vehicle. [Existing: Friday, July 19 and 20, 2024] [Existing: Friday, December 31, 2021] AM Peak PM Peak Sat PeakAM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak AM Peak PM Peak Sat PeakAM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak AM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak Table 1 ‐  Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Summary [with existing acceleration lanes] Existing (Year 2021 & 2024) Year 2027 Background Year 2027 Bkgrd + Project Year 2045 Background Year 2045 Bkgrd + Project Fox Tuttle  Transportation Group, LLC 8/5/2024 36 8 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt ‐ Vail, CO  (FT# 24056) Traffic Impact Analysis                   AM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak AM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak AM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak AM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak AM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak 1. S. Frontage Road at Westhaven  Drive [SUMMER]Side‐Street Stop Controlled Side‐Street Stop Controlled Side‐Street Stop Controlled Side‐Street Stop Controlled Side‐Street Stop Controlled    Eastbound Through ‐0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0'    Eastbound Right 260' 0' 0' 0'0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0'    Westbound Left 245' 3' 3' 3' 3'3' 3' 3' 3' 5' 3' 3' 3' 3' 5' 5' Westbound Through ‐0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0'   Northbound Left 40' 10' 10' 5' 10' 10' 5' 15' 13' 8' 10' 10' 5' 18' 13' 8'   Northbound Right ‐5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 8' 10' 8' 10' 8' 5' 8' 10' 8' 10' 1. S. Frontage Road at Westhaven  Drive [WINTER]Side‐Street Stop Controlled Side‐Street Stop Controlled Side‐Street Stop Controlled Side‐Street Stop Controlled Side‐Street Stop Controlled    Eastbound Through ‐0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0'    Eastbound Right 260' 0'0'0' 0'0' 0'0' 0'0' 0'    Westbound Left 245' 3'5'3' 5'5' 5'5' 5'5' 8' Westbound Through ‐0' 0'0' 0'0' 0'0' 0'0' 0'   Northbound Left 40' 10' 23'10' 25'20' 30'23' 28'13' 35'   Northbound Right ‐10' 8'10' 8'15' 10'15' 8'10' 10' Table 2 ‐  Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue Summary  [with existing acceleration lanes] Intersection and Lanes Groups Existing  Storage Existing (Year 2021 & 2024) Year 2027 Background Year 2027 Bkgrd + Project Year 2045 Background Year 2045 Bkgrd + Project Fox Tuttle  Transportation Group, LLC 8/5/2024 36 9 Cornerstone ‐ Vail, CO (FT# 24056) Traffic Impact Analysis Land Use Size Unit Rate Total In Out Rate Total In Out Rate Total In Out #221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise)30 units 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.54 136 68 68 0.37 11 3 8 0.39 12 7 5 #223 - Affordable Housing, Income Limits [Workforce]3 units 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.81 14 7 7 0.50 2 1 1 0.46 1 1 0 #822 - Strip Retail Plaza (<40k)3.334 ksf 0.98 0.74 1.00 54.45 134 67 67 2.36 8 5 3 2.94 7 4 3 #936 - Coffee/Donut Shop without Drive-Through 0.837 ksf 0.98 0.74 0.75 354.14 165 83 82 93.08 57 29 28 32.29 27 14 13 Pass-by Trips: Retail (PM) 40% 54 27 27 0 0 0 3 2 1 Pass-by Trips: Retail (Sat) 31% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 449 225 224 78 38 40 47 26 21 54 27 27 0 0 0 3 2 1 395 198 197 78 38 40 44 24 20 0.064 0.07 Land Use Size Unit Rate Total In Out Rate Total In Out #221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise)30 units 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.57 137 69 68 0.39 12 6 6 #223 - Affordable Housing, Income Limits [Workforce]3 units 1.00 1.00 1.00 12.00 36 18 18 1.28 4 2 2 #822 - Strip Retail Plaza (<40k)3.33 ksf 0.98 0.74 1.00 65.70 162 81 81 6.57 16 8 8 #936 - Coffee/Donut Shop without Drive-Through 0.84 ksf 0.98 0.74 0.75 130.47 61 31 30 90.93 42 21 21 Pass-by Trips: Retail (Sat) 31% 50 25 25 5 2 3 396 199 197 74 37 37 50 25 25 5 2 3 346 174 172 69 35 34 AM Internal Capture Table 3 ‐ Trip Generation Source:  ITE Trip Generation 11th Edition,  2021.  PM/ Sat Internal Capture Non- Auto Factor Weekday Average Daily Trips AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Total Trips Pass-by Trips Total New Trips Average Daily Trips Midday Peak Hour Trips Total Trips Pass-by Trips Total New Trips Source:  ITE Trip Generation 11th Edition,  2021.  SaturdayAM Internal Capture PM/ Sat Internal Capture Non- Auto Factor Fox Tuttle Transportation Group 8/6/2024 37 0 PROJECT SITE Location within Vail, CO Area Map Inter s t a t e 7 0 Vail Ski Mountain Vail S. FRO N T A G E R O A D INTE R S T A T E 7 0 WESTHA V E N D R I V E To Avon To Copper Grand Hyatt Cascade Village Cascade Village Original ScaleProject #Date Drawn by Figure # T r a n s p o r o puG rnoiatt FOX TUTTLE VICINITY MAP CORNERSTONE GRAND HYATT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - VAIL, CO 24056 NTS 8/6/2024 CRS 1 371 Original ScaleProject #Date Drawn by Figure # T r a n s p o r o puG rnoiatt FOX TUTTLE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN CORNERSTONE GRAND HYATT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - VAIL, CO 24056 NTS 8/6/2024 CRS 2 Proposed Access into Garage Full Movement Stop-Controlled 372 S U M M E R W I N T E R S. FRO N T A G E R O A D INTE R S T A T E 7 0 WESTHA V E N D R I V E Original ScaleProject #Date Drawn by Figure # T r a n s p o r o puG rnoiatt FOX TUTTLE YEAR 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES CORNERSTONE GRAND HYATT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - VAIL, CO 24056 NTS 8/6/2024 CRS 3 373 S U M M E R W I N T E R S. FRO N T A G E R O A D INTE R S T A T E 7 0 WESTHA V E N D R I V E Original ScaleProject #Date Drawn by Figure # T r a n s p o r o puG rnoiatt FOX TUTTLE YEAR 2027 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES CORNERSTONE GRAND HYATT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - VAIL, CO 24056 NTS 8/6/2024 CRS 4 374 S U M M E R W I N T E R S. FRO N T A G E R O A D INTE R S T A T E 7 0 WESTHA V E N D R I V E Original ScaleProject #Date Drawn by Figure # T r a n s p o r o puG rnoiatt FOX TUTTLE YEAR 2045 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES CORNERSTONE GRAND HYATT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - VAIL, CO 24056 NTS 8/6/2024 CRS 5 375 N E W T R I P S P A S S - B Y T R I P S S. FRO N T A G E R O A D INTE R S T A T E 7 0 WESTHA V E N D R I V E Original ScaleProject #Date Drawn by Figure # T r a n s p o r o puG rnoiatt FOX TUTTLE TRIP DISTRIBUTION CORNERSTONE GRAND HYATT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - VAIL, CO 24056 NTS 8/6/2024 CRS 6 376 N E W T R I P S T O T A L T R I P S P A S S - B Y T R I P SPROJECT SITE S. FRO N T A G E R O A D INTE R S T A T E 7 0 WESTHA V E N D R I V E Original ScaleProject #Date Drawn by Figure # T r a n s p o r o puG rnoiatt FOX TUTTLE SITE-GENERATED TRIPS CORNERSTONE GRAND HYATT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - VAIL, CO 24056 NTS 8/6/2024 CRS 7 377 S U M M E R W I N T E R S. FRO N T A G E R O A D INTE R S T A T E 7 0 WESTHA V E N D R I V E Original ScaleProject #Date Drawn by Figure # T r a n s p o r o puG rnoiatt FOX TUTTLE YEAR 2027 BACKGROUND + PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES CORNERSTONE GRAND HYATT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - VAIL, CO 24056 NTS 8/6/2024 CRS 8 378 S U M M E R W I N T E R S. FRO N T A G E R O A D INTE R S T A T E 7 0 WESTHA V E N D R I V E Original ScaleProject #Date Drawn by Figure # T r a n s p o r o puG rnoiatt FOX TUTTLE YEAR 2045 BACKGROUND + PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES CORNERSTONE GRAND HYATT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - VAIL, CO 24056 NTS 8/6/2024 CRS 9 379 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC August 6, 2024      Appendix:    Existing Traffic Data  Level of Service Definitions  Intersection Capacity Worksheets  Sensitivity Analysis             380 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC August 6, 2024        Existing   Traffic Data    381 www.idaxdata.com Date: Peak Hour Count Period: Peak Hour: HV%PHF EB 6%-- WB 16%-- NB 12%-- SB ---- TOTAL 10%-- Peak Hour Count Summaries UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 10:30 AM 0 0 59 13 0 6 27 0 0 8 0 11 0 0 0 0 124 0 10:45 AM 0 0 47 9 0 8 27 0 0 14 0 8 0 0 0 0 113 0 11:00 AM 0 0 57 7 0 8 34 0 0 18 0 11 0 0 0 0 135 0 11:15 AM 0 0 63 10 0 8 33 0 0 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 125 497 0 0 226 39 0 30 121 0 0 44 0 37 0 0 0 0 497 0 0 11 5 0 8 16 0 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 50 --5%13%-27%13%--9%-16%----10% EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB E W N S 10:30 AM 4 6 1 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 5 10:45 AM 5 9 3 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 2 11:00 AM 2 6 3 0 6 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 11:15 AM 5 3 3 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour 16 24 10 0 12 9 8 0 0 0 0 85029 8 0 11 10 1 11 6 11 6 5 17 7 2 Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) Total Total Total Interval Start Heavy Vehicle Totals Note: For complete count summary (all intervals), see following pages. ** Heavy Vehicle Classifications include FHWA Classes 4-13. ** Count Summaries include heavy vehicles, but exclude bicycles in overall count. Rolling Hour TotalEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound Peak Hour Interval Start S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Westhaven Dr n/a 15-min Total 10:30 AM to 11:30 AM 7/19/2024 9:30 AM to 11:30 AM 0 11 62 8 1 0 8 0 0 N Westhaven Dr S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd W e s t h a v e n D r S Frontage Rd 497TEV: --PHF: 121 30 151 2630 3744 8169 0 39 226265 165 0 TJ Wethington (720) 646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 382 www.idaxdata.com Count Summaries - All Vehicles UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 9:30 AM 0 0 54 8 0 7 25 0 0 9 0 8 0 0 0 0 111 0 9:45 AM 0 0 79 12 1 8 28 0 0 12 0 11 0 0 0 0 151 0 10:00 AM 0 0 48 10 0 4 25 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 105 0 10:15 AM 0 0 44 12 0 7 17 0 0 11 0 10 0 0 0 0 101 468 10:30 AM 0 0 59 13 0 6 27 0 0 8 0 11 0 0 0 0 124 481 10:45 AM 0 0 47 9 0 8 27 0 0 14 0 8 0 0 0 0 113 443 11:00 AM 0 0 57 7 0 8 34 0 0 18 0 11 0 0 0 0 135 473 11:15 AM 0 0 63 10 0 8 33 0 0 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 125 497 Count Total 0 0 451 81 1 56 216 0 0 85 0 75 0 0 0 0 965 0 0 226 39 0 30 121 0 0 44 0 37 0 0 0 0 497 0 0 11 5 0 8 16 0 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 50 --5%13%-27%13%--9%-16%----10% EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB E W N S 9:30 AM 6 8 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 9:45 AM 8 5 4 0 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 10:00 AM 2 3 4 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:15 AM 7 2 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 10:30 AM 4 6 1 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 5 10:45 AM 5 9 3 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 2 11:00 AM 2 6 3 0 6 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 11:15 AM 5 3 3 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count Total 39 42 24 0 27 22 10 0 0 0 0 16 Peak Hour 16 24 10 0 12 9 8 0 0 0 0 8 105 59 16 50 29 8 11 10 1 11 6 0 11 6 5 17 7 2 9 4 1 10 4 2 19 3 4 17 19 1 Interval Start Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) Total Total Total Rolling Hour TotalEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound Interval Start S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Westhaven Dr n/a 15-min Total TJ Wethington (720) 646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 383 www.idaxdata.com Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 9:30 AM 0 0 4 2 0 6 2 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 19 0 9:45 AM 0 0 6 2 0 2 3 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 17 0 10:00 AM 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 9 0 10:15 AM 0 0 6 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 55 10:30 AM 0 0 4 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 47 10:45 AM 0 0 3 2 0 3 6 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 17 47 11:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 49 11:15 AM 0 0 4 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 11 50 Count Total 0 0 28 11 0 18 24 0 0 9 0 15 0 0 0 0 105 Pk Hr Heavy 0 0 11 5 0 8 16 0 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 50 Count Summaries - Bikes UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 9:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 9:45 AM 0 0 13 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 10:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 10:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 30 10:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 33 10:45 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 21 11:00 AM 1 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 10 27 11:15 AM 0 0 2 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 Count Total 1 0 25 1 0 2 20 0 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 59 Pk Hr Bike 1 0 11 0 0 1 8 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 29 15-min Total Rolling Hour TotalEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound Rolling Hour TotalEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound Interval Start S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Westhaven Dr n/a Interval Start S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Westhaven Dr n/a 15-min Total TJ Wethington (720) 646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 384 www.idaxdata.com Date: Peak Hour Count Period: Peak Hour: HV%PHF EB 5%1.03 WB 5%0.87 NB 9%0.97 SB ---- TOTAL 5%0.94 Peak Hour Count Summaries UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 4:30 PM 0 0 56 8 0 5 53 0 0 14 0 13 0 0 0 0 149 0 4:45 PM 0 0 58 9 0 12 50 0 0 8 0 10 0 0 0 0 147 0 5:00 PM 0 0 55 3 0 10 65 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 155 0 5:15 PM 0 0 41 8 0 11 54 0 0 12 0 6 0 0 0 0 132 583 0 0 210 28 0 38 222 0 0 45 0 40 0 0 0 0 583 0 0 9 2 0 7 6 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 32 --4%7%-18%3%--4%-15%----5% EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB E W N S 4:30 PM 4 1 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:45 PM 4 6 3 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 2 1 2 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 1 5 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour 11 13 8 0 5 12 0 0 0 0 0 23217 2 0 5 4 0 7 4 7 4 2 13 5 0 Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) Total Total Total Interval Start Heavy Vehicle Totals Note: For complete count summary (all intervals), see following pages. ** Heavy Vehicle Classifications include FHWA Classes 4-13. ** Count Summaries include heavy vehicles, but exclude bicycles in overall count. Rolling Hour TotalEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound Peak Hour Interval Start S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Westhaven Dr n/a 15-min Total 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM 7/19/2024 4:30 PM to 6:30 PM 0 5 00 10 2 0 2 0 0 N Westhaven Dr S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd W e s t h a v e n D r S Frontage Rd 583TEV: 0.9403PHF: 222 38 260 2500 4045 8566 0 28 210238 267 0 TJ Wethington (720) 646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 385 www.idaxdata.com Count Summaries - All Vehicles UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 4:30 PM 0 0 56 8 0 5 53 0 0 14 0 13 0 0 0 0 149 0 4:45 PM 0 0 58 9 0 12 50 0 0 8 0 10 0 0 0 0 147 0 5:00 PM 0 0 55 3 0 10 65 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 155 0 5:15 PM 0 0 41 8 0 11 54 0 0 12 0 6 0 0 0 0 132 583 5:30 PM 0 0 47 9 0 6 34 0 0 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 115 549 5:45 PM 0 0 41 11 0 7 44 0 0 13 0 9 0 0 0 0 125 527 6:00 PM 0 0 49 6 0 4 33 0 0 7 0 9 0 0 0 0 108 480 6:15 PM 0 0 31 9 0 8 39 0 0 14 0 3 0 0 0 0 104 452 Count Total 0 0 378 63 0 63 372 0 0 88 0 71 0 0 0 0 1,035 0 0 210 28 0 38 222 0 0 45 0 40 0 0 0 0 583 0 0 9 2 0 7 6 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 32 --4%7%-18%3%--4%-15%----5% EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB E W N S 4:30 PM 4 1 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:45 PM 4 6 3 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 2 1 2 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 1 5 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 3 3 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:45 PM 0 3 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 6:00 PM 4 3 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:15 PM 3 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Count Total 21 25 20 0 13 13 0 0 0 0 0 11 Peak Hour 11 13 8 0 5 12 0 0 0 0 0 2 66 26 11 32 17 2 10 4 0 8 1 1 10 1 3 6 3 5 5 4 0 7 4 0 7 4 2 13 5 0 Interval Start Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) Total Total Total Rolling Hour TotalEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound Interval Start S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Westhaven Dr n/a 15-min Total TJ Wethington (720) 646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 386 www.idaxdata.com Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 4:30 PM 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 4:45 PM 0 0 3 1 0 3 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 13 0 5:00 PM 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 32 5:30 PM 0 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 10 35 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 6 28 6:00 PM 0 0 3 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 10 33 6:15 PM 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 8 34 Count Total 0 0 18 3 0 15 10 0 0 4 0 16 0 0 0 0 66 Pk Hr Heavy 0 0 9 2 0 7 6 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 32 Count Summaries - Bikes UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4:45 PM 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5:00 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 5:15 PM 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 17 5:30 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 5:45 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12 6:00 PM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 12 6:15 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 Count Total 0 0 13 0 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Pk Hr Bike 0 0 5 0 0 2 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 15-min Total Rolling Hour TotalEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound Rolling Hour TotalEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound Interval Start S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Westhaven Dr n/a Interval Start S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Westhaven Dr n/a 15-min Total TJ Wethington (720) 646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 387 www.idaxdata.com Date: Peak Hour Count Period: Peak Hour: HV%PHF EB 4%-- WB 5%-- NB 15%-- SB ---- TOTAL 5%-- Peak Hour Count Summaries UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 11:00 AM 0 0 43 4 1 12 27 0 0 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 101 0 11:15 AM 0 0 63 7 0 11 20 0 0 3 0 13 0 0 0 0 117 0 11:30 AM 0 0 56 9 0 6 23 0 0 5 0 12 0 0 0 0 111 0 11:45 AM 0 0 66 11 0 6 30 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 135 464 0 0 228 31 1 35 100 0 0 25 0 44 0 0 0 0 464 0 0 7 2 0 6 1 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 25 --3%6%0%17%1%--4%-18%----5% EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB E W N S 11:00 AM 1 2 1 0 88 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 AM 2 0 3 0 86 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 11:30 AM 3 4 3 0 55 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 AM 3 1 2 0 57 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 Peak Hour 9 7 9 0 286 28 1 0 0 0 0 425315 4 3 10 67 0 6 64 4 92 0 5 92 1 Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) Total Total Total Interval Start Heavy Vehicle Totals Note: For complete count summary (all intervals), see following pages. ** Heavy Vehicle Classifications include FHWA Classes 4-13. ** Count Summaries include heavy vehicles, but exclude bicycles in overall count. Rolling Hour TotalEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound Peak Hour Interval Start S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Westhaven Dr n/a 15-min Total 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM 7/20/2024 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM 3 283 10 28 0 0 4 0 0 N Westhaven Dr S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd W e s t h a v e n D r S Frontage Rd 363TEV: --PHF: 100 35 96 2211 4425 5550 0 31 228212 92 0 TJ Wethington (720) 646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 388 www.idaxdata.com Count Summaries - All Vehicles UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 10:00 AM 0 0 57 6 0 12 17 0 0 11 0 7 0 0 0 0 110 0 10:15 AM 0 0 47 8 0 2 21 0 0 9 0 15 0 0 0 0 102 0 10:30 AM 0 0 41 3 0 2 17 0 0 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 75 0 10:45 AM 0 0 49 7 0 7 33 0 0 10 0 12 0 0 0 0 118 405 11:00 AM 0 0 43 4 1 12 27 0 0 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 101 396 11:15 AM 0 0 63 7 0 11 20 0 0 3 0 13 0 0 0 0 117 411 11:30 AM 0 0 56 9 0 6 23 0 0 5 0 12 0 0 0 0 111 447 11:45 AM 0 0 66 11 0 6 30 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 135 464 Count Total 0 0 422 55 1 58 188 0 0 60 0 85 0 0 0 0 869 0 0 228 31 1 35 100 0 0 25 0 44 0 0 0 0 464 0 0 7 2 0 6 1 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 25 --3%6%0%17%1%--4%-18%----5% EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB E W N S 10:00 AM 6 2 3 0 18 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 10:15 AM 2 1 3 0 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 AM 4 2 0 0 61 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 AM 2 5 4 0 57 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 AM 1 2 1 0 88 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 AM 2 0 3 0 86 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 11:30 AM 3 4 3 0 55 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 AM 3 1 2 0 57 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 Count Total 23 17 19 0 442 46 1 0 0 0 0 5 Peak Hour 9 7 9 0 286 28 1 0 0 0 0 4 59 489 5 25 315 4 10 67 0 6 64 3 4 92 0 5 92 1 6 67 0 11 65 0 11 21 1 6 21 0 Interval Start Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) Total Total Total Rolling Hour TotalEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound Interval Start S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Westhaven Dr n/a 15-min Total TJ Wethington (720) 646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 389 www.idaxdata.com Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 10:00 AM 0 0 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 11 0 10:15 AM 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 0 10:30 AM 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 10:45 AM 0 0 1 1 0 3 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 11 34 11:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 27 11:15 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 5 26 11:30 AM 0 0 2 1 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 10 30 11:45 AM 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 25 Count Total 0 0 17 6 0 13 4 0 0 5 0 14 0 0 0 0 59 Pk Hr Heavy 0 0 7 2 0 6 1 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 25 Count Summaries - Bikes UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 10:00 AM 0 0 18 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 10:15 AM 0 0 20 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 10:30 AM 0 0 59 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 10:45 AM 0 0 57 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 174 11:00 AM 0 0 88 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 245 11:15 AM 0 0 86 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 316 11:30 AM 0 0 52 3 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 67 316 11:45 AM 0 0 57 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 315 Count Total 0 0 437 5 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 489 Pk Hr Bike 0 0 283 3 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 315 15-min Total Rolling Hour TotalEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound Rolling Hour TotalEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound Interval Start S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Westhaven Dr n/a Interval Start S Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Westhaven Dr n/a 15-min Total TJ Wethington (720) 646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 390 Location: Count Direction: Date Range: Site Code: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 26 4,589 1,471 248 178 56 0 2 4 0 0 0 1 0.4%69.8%22.4%3.8%2.7%0.9%0.0%0.0%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 131 3,644 1,023 83 88 58 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2.6%72.5%20.3%1.7%1.7%1.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 157 8,233 2,494 331 266 114 0 3 5 0 0 0 1 1.4%70.9%21.5%2.9%2.3%1.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% FHWA Vehicle Classification Class 1 - Motorcycles Class 8 - Four or Fewer Axle Single-Trailer Trucks Class 2 - Passenger Cars Class 9 - Five-Axle Single-Trailer Trucks Class 3 - Other Two-Axle, Four-Tire Single Unit Vehicles Class 10 - Six or More Axle Single-Trailer Trucks Class 4 - Buses Class 11 - Five or fewer Axle Multi-Trailer Trucks Class 5 - Two-Axle, Six-Tire, Single-Unit Trucks Class 12 - Six-Axle Multi-Trailer Trucks Class 6 - Three-Axle Single-Unit Trucks Class 13 - Seven or More Axle Multi-Trailer Trucks Class 7 - Four or More Axle Single-Unit Trucks Vehicle Classification Report Summary S Frontage Rd W/O Westhaven Dr Eastbound / Westbound 7/19/2024 to 7/20/2024 01 Total FHWA Vehicle ClassificationDirection Total Volume Eastbound Westbound 11,604 5,029 6,575 1 TJ Wethington: 720-646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 391 Location:S Frontage Rd W/O Westhaven Dr Direction:Eastbound / Westbound Date Range:7/19/2024 to 7/20/2024 Site Code:01 0 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + 0 2 11 22 84 414 1,483 2,585 1,524 375 61 10 3 0 1 0 0 0.0%0.0%0.2%0.3%1.3%6.3%22.6%39.3%23.2%5.7%0.9%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 21 4 4 12 86 290 1,209 2,044 1,074 242 32 10 1 0 0 0 0 0.4%0.1%0.1%0.2%1.7%5.8%24.0%40.6%21.4%4.8%0.6%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 21 6 15 34 170 704 2,692 4,629 2,598 617 93 20 4 0 1 0 0 0.2%0.1%0.1%0.3%1.5%6.1%23.2%39.9%22.4%5.3%0.8%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 50th Percentile (Median)42.6 mph Mean (Average) Speed 42.4 mph 47.5 mph 10 mph Pace 37.7 - 47.7 mph 50.9 mph Percent in Pace 67.7 % 50th Percentile (Median)42.2 mph Mean (Average) Speed 41.9 mph 47.0 mph 10 mph Pace 37.2 - 47.2 mph 50.3 mph Percent in Pace 70.4 % Vehicle Speed Report Summary Total Study Percentile Speed Summary Total Study Speed Statistics 85th Percentile 11,604 5,029 6,575 WestboundWestbound EastboundEastbound Total Westbound Eastbound Total VolumeDirectionSpeed Range (mph) 95th Percentile 85th Percentile 95th Percentile 1 TJ Wethington: 720-646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 392 Location:S Frontage Rd W/O Westhaven Dr Date Range:7/19/2024 - 7/25/2024 Site Code:01 EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 6 20 26 18 32 50 ---------------############### 1:00 AM 8 13 21 12 22 34 ---------------############### 2:00 AM 5 4 9 8 16 24 ---------------############### 3:00 AM 3 1 4 6 7 13 ---------------############### 4:00 AM 12 1 13 18 4 22 ---------------############### 5:00 AM 35 8 43 27 6 33 ---------------############### 6:00 AM 148 34 182 95 32 127 ---------------############### 7:00 AM 221 77 298 171 64 235 ---------------############### 8:00 AM 296 108 404 201 75 276 ---------------############### 9:00 AM 289 160 449 188 123 311 ---------------############### 10:00 AM 239 148 387 201 119 320 ---------------############### 11:00 AM 278 180 458 200 139 339 ---------------############### 12:00 PM 259 198 457 208 151 359 ---------------############### 1:00 PM 267 229 496 199 147 346 ---------------############### 2:00 PM 247 167 414 214 182 396 ---------------############### 3:00 PM 248 279 527 246 213 459 ---------------############### 4:00 PM 274 257 531 225 212 437 ---------------############### 5:00 PM 209 238 447 178 169 347 ---------------############### 6:00 PM 163 155 318 133 117 250 ---------------############### 7:00 PM 119 101 220 125 99 224 ---------------############### 8:00 PM 96 123 219 106 126 232 ---------------############### 9:00 PM 96 90 186 84 86 170 ---------------############### 10:00 PM 61 78 139 58 94 152 ---------------############### 11:00 PM 40 73 113 35 52 87 ---------------############### Total 3,619 2,742 6,361 2,956 2,287 5,243 ---------------############### Percent 57%43%56%44%------------ AM Peak 08:00 11:00 11:00 08:00 11:00 11:00 ---------------############### Vol.296 180 458 201 139 339 ---------------############### PM Peak 16:00 15:00 16:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 ---------------############### Vol.274 279 531 246 213 459 ---------------############### 1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday. 7/19/2024 7/20/2024 7/21/2024 7/22/2024 7/23/2024 7/24/2024Time Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Mid-Week Average7/25/2024 1 TJ Wethington: 720-646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 393 Location: Count Direction: Date Range: Site Code: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 51 1,353 354 33 155 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6%68.2%17.8%1.7%7.8%2.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 29 1,343 425 127 172 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1.4%63.8%20.2%6.0%8.2%0.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 80 2,696 779 160 327 47 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2.0%65.9%19.0%3.9%8.0%1.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% FHWA Vehicle Classification Class 1 - Motorcycles Class 8 - Four or Fewer Axle Single-Trailer Trucks Class 2 - Passenger Cars Class 9 - Five-Axle Single-Trailer Trucks Class 3 - Other Two-Axle, Four-Tire Single Unit Vehicles Class 10 - Six or More Axle Single-Trailer Trucks Class 4 - Buses Class 11 - Five or fewer Axle Multi-Trailer Trucks Class 5 - Two-Axle, Six-Tire, Single-Unit Trucks Class 12 - Six-Axle Multi-Trailer Trucks Class 6 - Three-Axle Single-Unit Trucks Class 13 - Seven or More Axle Multi-Trailer Trucks Class 7 - Four or More Axle Single-Unit Trucks Vehicle Classification Report Summary Westhaven Dr S/O S Frontage Rd Northbound / Southbound 7/19/2024 to 7/20/2024 02 Total FHWA Vehicle ClassificationDirection Total Volume Northbound Southbound 4,090 2,105 1,985 1 TJ Wethington: 720-646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 394 Location:Westhaven Dr S/O S Frontage Rd Direction:Northbound / Southbound Date Range:7/19/2024 to 7/20/2024 Site Code:02 0 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + 107 903 921 51 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.4%45.5%46.4%2.6%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 37 839 1,125 101 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.8%39.9%53.4%4.8%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 144 1,742 2,046 152 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5%42.6%50.0%3.7%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 50th Percentile (Median)15.0 mph Mean (Average) Speed 14.8 mph 17.4 mph 10 mph Pace 9.7 - 19.7 mph 19.0 mph Percent in Pace 92.1 % 50th Percentile (Median)15.5 mph Mean (Average) Speed 15.6 mph 18.2 mph 10 mph Pace 11.0 - 21.0 mph 20.0 mph Percent in Pace 94.5 % Vehicle Speed Report Summary Total Study Percentile Speed Summary Total Study Speed Statistics 85th Percentile 4,090 2,105 1,985 SouthboundSouthbound NorthboundNorthbound Total Southbound Northbound Total VolumeDirectionSpeed Range (mph) 95th Percentile 85th Percentile 95th Percentile 1 TJ Wethington: 720-646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 395 Location:Westhaven Dr S/O S Frontage Rd Date Range:7/19/2024 - 7/25/2024 Site Code:02 NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 5 5 10 12 15 27 ---------------############### 1:00 AM 6 7 13 9 8 17 ---------------############### 2:00 AM 0 1 1 1 2 3 ---------------############### 3:00 AM 0 2 2 1 3 4 ---------------############### 4:00 AM 2 2 4 2 5 7 ---------------############### 5:00 AM 2 7 9 13 7 20 ---------------############### 6:00 AM 18 35 53 20 29 49 ---------------############### 7:00 AM 30 63 93 30 41 71 ---------------############### 8:00 AM 56 70 126 43 40 83 ---------------############### 9:00 AM 79 80 159 70 43 113 ---------------############### 10:00 AM 85 68 153 72 48 120 ---------------############### 11:00 AM 90 70 160 68 65 133 ---------------############### 12:00 PM 89 93 182 66 64 130 ---------------############### 1:00 PM 79 82 161 52 59 111 ---------------############### 2:00 PM 59 69 128 73 86 159 ---------------############### 3:00 PM 90 96 186 60 73 133 ---------------############### 4:00 PM 82 74 156 52 62 114 ---------------############### 5:00 PM 82 72 154 69 58 127 ---------------############### 6:00 PM 53 59 112 47 60 107 ---------------############### 7:00 PM 29 48 77 45 50 95 ---------------############### 8:00 PM 30 45 75 36 58 94 ---------------############### 9:00 PM 32 40 72 26 39 65 ---------------############### 10:00 PM 33 26 59 37 43 80 ---------------############### 11:00 PM 29 21 50 21 12 33 ---------------############### Total 1,060 1,135 2,195 925 970 1,895 ---------------############### Percent 48%52%49%51%------------ AM Peak 11:00 09:00 11:00 10:00 11:00 11:00 ---------------############### Vol.90 80 160 72 65 133 ---------------############### PM Peak 15:00 15:00 15:00 14:00 14:00 14:00 ---------------############### Vol.90 96 186 73 86 159 ---------------############### 1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday. 7/19/2024 7/20/2024 7/21/2024 7/22/2024 7/23/2024 7/24/2024Time Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Mid-Week Average7/25/2024 1 TJ Wethington: 720-646-1008 tj.wethington@idaxdata.com 396 www.idaxdata.com to to Two-Hour Count Summaries Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count. Total 1 1 0 0 2 2 WB 19.3%0.73 NB 26.3%0.63 Peak Hour: 8:15 AM 9:15 AM HV %:PHF EB 7.2%0.88 Date: 12/31/2021 Peak Hour Count Period: 8:15 AM 9:15 AM UT LT TH RT Interval Start S FRONTAGE RD W S FRONTAGE RD W WESTHAVEN DR N/A 15-min TotalUTLTTHRT SB -- TOTAL 12.2%0.98 TH RT 8:15 AM 0 0 102 15 0 7 20 UT LT TH RT UT LT Rolling One HourEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound 0 12 22 0 0 6 0 0 0 158 0 8:30 AM 0 0 96 11 0 0 8 0 6 0 0 0 0 155 0 9:00 AM 0 0 82 12 0 0 2 0 11 0 160 0 8:45 AM 0 0 84 12 0 8 38 0 13 0 0 0 0 152 625010000008200119 Count Total 0 0 364 50 0 35 100 0 0 0 625 0 Peak Hour All 0 0 364 0 1 35 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 76 017008012 0 625 0 HV 0 0 22 8 0 9 35 0 40 0 0 05003510001 0 Interval Start Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total 30%----12%26%17%-0%23%-HV%--6%16%- 0 1 8:30 AM 10 8 4 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West North South 8:15 AM 6 6 5 0 17 0 EB WB NB SB Total East 9:00 AM 9 8 7 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 5 4 4 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0000000 1 1 Peak Hr 30 26 20 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Count Total 30 26 20 0 76 0 1000001 0 0 00 0 0 1 1 0 0 N WESTHAVEN DR S FRONTAGE RD W S FRONTAGE RD W W E S T H A V E N DR S FRONTAGE RD W 625TEV: 0.98PHF: 100 35 135 4040 4035 7686 1 50 364414 135 0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 project.manager.ca@idaxdata.com 397 www.idaxdata.com Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. Northbound Southbound UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT Interval Start S FRONTAGE RD W S FRONTAGE RD W WESTHAVEN DR N/A 15-min Total Rolling One HourEastboundWestbound 0 0 0 17 0 8:30 AM 0 0 8 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 TH RT 8:15 AM 0 0 4 2 0 2 4 UT LT TH RT UT LT 22 0 8:45 AM 0 0 4 1 0 1 3 0 3 0 0 0 0035001 0 3 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 13 0 9:00 AM 0 0 6 3 0 0 1 0 3 0 24 76030000 0 0 0 76 0 Peak Hour 0 0 22 8 0 0 8 0 12 0Count Total 0 0 22 8 0 9 17 Westbound Northbound Southbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT 76 0 Interval Start S FRONTAGE RD W S FRONTAGE RD W WESTHAVEN DR N/A 15-min Total Rolling One HourEastbound 0 12 0 0 0 00917008 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TH RT LT TH RT 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 Count Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 project.manager.ca@idaxdata.com 398 www.idaxdata.com to to Two-Hour Count Summaries Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count. Total 0 0 2 1 3 3 WB 5.1%0.99 NB 13.3%0.82 Peak Hour: 3:45 PM 4:45 PM HV %:PHF EB 8.3%0.92 Date: 12/30/2021 Peak Hour Count Period: 3:45 PM 4:45 PM UT LT TH RT Interval Start S FRONTAGE RD W S FRONTAGE RD W WESTHAVEN DR N/A 15-min TotalUTLTTHRT SB -- TOTAL 7.4%0.95 TH RT 3:45 PM 1 0 64 13 0 20 93 UT LT TH RT UT LT Rolling One HourEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound 0 19 94 0 0 14 0 0 0 222 0 4:00 PM 0 0 68 11 0 0 15 0 16 0 0 0 0 233 0 4:30 PM 0 0 52 11 0 0 30 0 11 0 222 0 4:15 PM 0 0 75 7 0 18 92 0 16 0 0 0 0 210 8870120000016980021 Count Total 1 0 259 42 0 73 377 0 0 0 887 0 Peak Hour All 1 0 259 0 0 80 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 66 08006012 0 887 0 HV 0 0 21 4 0 15 80 0 55 0 0 04207337700 0 Interval Start Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total 22%----7%21%2%--8%-HV%0%-8%10%- 0 0 4:00 PM 5 3 6 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West North South 3:45 PM 7 8 4 0 19 0 EB WB NB SB Total East 4:30 PM 5 7 2 0 14 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 4:15 PM 8 5 6 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000000 1 1 Peak Hr 25 23 18 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0Count Total 25 23 18 0 66 0 1000101 0 0 00 0 0 1 1 0 1 N WESTHAVEN DR S FRONTAGE RD W S FRONTAGE RD W W E S T H A V E N DR S FRONTAGE RD W 887TEV: 0.95PHF: 377 73 450 3140 5580 13 5 11 5 0 42 259302 458 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 project.manager.ca@idaxdata.com 399 www.idaxdata.com Two-Hour Count Summaries - Heavy Vehicles Two-Hour Count Summaries - Bikes Note: U-Turn volumes for bikes are included in Left-Turn, if any. Northbound Southbound UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT Interval Start S FRONTAGE RD W S FRONTAGE RD W WESTHAVEN DR N/A 15-min Total Rolling One HourEastboundWestbound 0 0 0 19 0 4:00 PM 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 TH RT 3:45 PM 0 0 5 2 0 5 3 UT LT TH RT UT LT 14 0 4:15 PM 0 0 8 0 0 4 1 0 5 0 0 0 0021001 0 4 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 19 0 4:30 PM 0 0 4 1 0 0 3 0 3 0 14 66010000 0 0 0 66 0 Peak Hour 0 0 21 4 0 0 6 0 12 0Count Total 0 0 21 4 0 15 8 Westbound Northbound Southbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT 66 0 Interval Start S FRONTAGE RD W S FRONTAGE RD W WESTHAVEN DR N/A 15-min Total Rolling One HourEastbound 0 12 0 0 0 00158006 0 0 0 0 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TH RT LT TH RT 3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 Count Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469 project.manager.ca@idaxdata.com 400 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC August 6, 2024        Level of Service   Definitions     401 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS In rating roadway and intersection operating conditions with existing or future traffic volumes, “Levels of Service” (LOS) A through F are used, with LOS A indicating very good operation and LOS F indicating poor operation. Levels of service at signalized and unsignalized intersections are closely associated with vehicle delays experienced in seconds per vehicle. More complete level of service definitions and delay data for signal and stop sign controlled intersections are contained in the following table for reference. Level of Service Rating Delay in seconds per vehicle (a) Definition Signalized Unsignalized A 0.0 to 10.0 0.0 to 10.0 Low vehicular traffic volumes; primarily free flow operations. Density is low and vehicles can freely maneuver within the traffic stream. Drivers are able to maintain their desired speeds with little or no delay. B 10.1 to 20.0 10.1 to 15.0 Stable vehicular traffic volume flow with potential for some restriction of operating speeds due to traffic conditions. Vehicle maneuvering is only slightly restricted. The stopped delays are not bothersome and drivers are not subject to appreciable tension. C 20.1 to 35.0 15.1 to 25.0 Stable traffic operations, however the ability for vehicles to maneuver is more restricted by the increase in traffic volumes. Relatively satisfactory operating speeds prevail, but adverse signal coordination or longer vehicle queues cause delays along the corridor. D 35.1 to 55.0 25.1 to 35.0 Approaching unstable vehicular traffic flow where small increases in volume could cause substantial delays. Most drivers are restricted in ability to maneuver and selection of travel speeds due to congestion. Driver comfort and convenience are low, but tolerable. E 55.1 to 80.0 35.1 to 50.0 Traffic operations characterized by significant approach delays and average travel speeds of one-half to one-third the free flow speed. Vehicular flow is unstable and there is potential for stoppages of brief duration. High signal density, extensive vehicle queuing, or corridor signal progression/timing are the typical causes of vehicle delays at signalized corridors. F > 80.0 > 50.0 Forced vehicular traffic flow and operations with high approach delays at critical intersections. Vehicle speeds are reduced substantially, and stoppages may occur for short or long periods of time because of downstream congestion. (a) Delay ranges based on Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition, 2016) criteria. 402 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC August 6, 2024        Intersection Capacity Worksheets:  Existing   403 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2024 Existing [Summer] - AM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 226 39 30 121 44 37 Future Vol, veh/h 226 39 30 121 44 37 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 88000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 90 90 70 70 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 2 2 16 12 12 Mvmt Flow 248 43 33 134 63 53 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 299 0 456 256 Stage 1 - - - - 256 - Stage 2 - - - - 200 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.52 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.608 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1262 - 544 759 Stage 1 - - - - 764 - Stage 2 - - - - 810 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1252 - 526 753 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 593 - Stage 1 - - - - 758 - Stage 2 - - - - 789 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.6 11 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)593 753 - - 1252 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.106 0.07 - - 0.027 - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.8 10.1 - - 8 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.2 - - 0.1 - 404 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2024 Existing [Summer] - PM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 210 28 38 222 45 40 Future Vol, veh/h 210 28 38 222 45 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 22599 Mvmt Flow 236 31 44 255 57 51 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 269 0 581 238 Stage 1 - - - - 238 - Stage 2 - - - - 343 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.49 6.29 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.581 3.381 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1295 - 464 784 Stage 1 - - - - 785 - Stage 2 - - - - 703 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1293 - 447 783 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 533 - Stage 1 - - - - 783 - Stage 2 - - - - 679 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.2 11.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)533 783 - - 1293 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.107 0.065 - - 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.6 9.9 - - 7.9 - HCM Lane LOS B A - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.2 - - 0.1 - 405 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2024 Existing [Summer] - Sat Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 228 31 35 100 25 44 Future Vol, veh/h 228 31 35 100 25 44 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 44000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 84 84 85 85 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 5 5 15 15 Mvmt Flow 271 37 41 118 32 56 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 312 0 475 275 Stage 1 - - - - 275 - Stage 2 - - - - 200 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.15 - 6.55 6.35 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.245 - 3.635 3.435 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1232 - 525 734 Stage 1 - - - - 742 - Stage 2 - - - - 804 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1227 - 506 731 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 576 - Stage 1 - - - - 739 - Stage 2 - - - - 777 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.1 10.8 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)576 731 - - 1227 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.056 0.077 - - 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.6 10.3 - - 8 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.2 - - 0.1 - 406 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2024 Existing [Winter] - AM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 364 50 35 100 36 40 Future Vol, veh/h 364 50 35 100 36 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 73 73 63 63 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 414 57 48 137 57 63 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 472 0 648 415 Stage 1 - - - - 415 - Stage 2 - - - - 233 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1064 - 399 589 Stage 1 - - - - 618 - Stage 2 - - - - 752 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1063 - 381 588 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 474 - Stage 1 - - - - 617 - Stage 2 - - - - 718 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.2 12.7 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)474 588 - - 1063 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.121 0.108 - - 0.045 - HCM Control Delay (s) 13.6 11.9 - - 8.5 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.4 - - 0.1 - 407 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2024 Existing [Winter] - PM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 259 42 73 377 80 55 Future Vol, veh/h 259 42 73 377 80 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11001 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 99 99 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 282 46 74 381 98 67 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 329 0 812 284 Stage 1 - - - - 283 - Stage 2 - - - - 529 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1203 - 318 701 Stage 1 - - - - 713 - Stage 2 - - - - 545 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1202 - 298 700 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 400 - Stage 1 - - - - 712 - Stage 2 - - - - 511 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.3 14.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)400 700 - - 1202 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.244 0.096 - - 0.061 - HCM Control Delay (s) 16.9 10.7 - - 8.2 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 0.3 - - 0.2 - 408 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC August 6, 2024        Intersection Capacity Worksheets:  Year 2027 Background  409 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2027 Background [Summer] - AM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 233 39 30 125 44 37 Future Vol, veh/h 233 39 30 125 44 37 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 88000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 90 90 70 70 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 2 2 16 12 12 Mvmt Flow 256 43 33 139 63 53 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 307 0 469 264 Stage 1 - - - - 264 - Stage 2 - - - - 205 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.52 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.608 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1254 - 535 751 Stage 1 - - - - 758 - Stage 2 - - - - 806 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1244 - 516 745 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 586 - Stage 1 - - - - 752 - Stage 2 - - - - 784 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.5 11.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)586 745 - - 1244 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.107 0.071 - - 0.027 - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.9 10.2 - - 8 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.2 - - 0.1 - 410 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2027 Background [Summer] - PM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 216 28 38 229 45 40 Future Vol, veh/h 216 28 38 229 45 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 22599 Mvmt Flow 243 31 44 263 57 51 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 276 0 596 245 Stage 1 - - - - 245 - Stage 2 - - - - 351 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.49 6.29 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.581 3.381 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1287 - 455 777 Stage 1 - - - - 780 - Stage 2 - - - - 697 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1285 - 439 776 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 527 - Stage 1 - - - - 778 - Stage 2 - - - - 673 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.1 11.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)527 776 - - 1285 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.108 0.065 - - 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.7 10 - - 7.9 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.2 - - 0.1 - 411 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2027 Background [Summer] - Sat Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 235 31 35 103 25 44 Future Vol, veh/h 235 31 35 103 25 44 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 44000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 84 84 85 85 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 5 5 15 15 Mvmt Flow 280 37 41 121 32 56 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 321 0 487 284 Stage 1 - - - - 284 - Stage 2 - - - - 203 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.15 - 6.55 6.35 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.245 - 3.635 3.435 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1222 - 517 725 Stage 1 - - - - 735 - Stage 2 - - - - 801 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1217 - 497 722 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 570 - Stage 1 - - - - 732 - Stage 2 - - - - 774 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2 10.9 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)570 722 - - 1217 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.056 0.078 - - 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.7 10.4 - - 8.1 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 - - 0.1 - 412 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2027 Background [Winter] - AM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 375 50 35 103 36 40 Future Vol, veh/h 375 50 35 103 36 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 73 73 63 63 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 426 57 48 141 57 63 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 484 0 664 427 Stage 1 - - - - 427 - Stage 2 - - - - 237 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1053 - 391 580 Stage 1 - - - - 610 - Stage 2 - - - - 749 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1052 - 373 579 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 468 - Stage 1 - - - - 609 - Stage 2 - - - - 715 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.2 12.9 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)468 579 - - 1052 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.122 0.11 - - 0.046 - HCM Control Delay (s) 13.8 12 - - 8.6 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.4 - - 0.1 - 413 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2027 Background [Winter] - PM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 267 42 73 388 80 55 Future Vol, veh/h 267 42 73 388 80 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11001 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 99 99 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 290 46 74 392 98 67 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 337 0 831 292 Stage 1 - - - - 291 - Stage 2 - - - - 540 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1195 - 309 694 Stage 1 - - - - 707 - Stage 2 - - - - 539 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1194 - 290 693 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 394 - Stage 1 - - - - 706 - Stage 2 - - - - 506 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.3 14.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)394 693 - - 1194 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.248 0.097 - - 0.062 - HCM Control Delay (s) 17.1 10.8 - - 8.2 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0.3 - - 0.2 - 414 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC August 6, 2024        Intersection Capacity Worksheets:  Year 2045 Background  415 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2045 Background [Summer] - AM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 280 40 30 150 45 40 Future Vol, veh/h 280 40 30 150 45 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 88000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 90 90 70 70 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 2 2 16 12 12 Mvmt Flow 308 44 33 167 64 57 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 360 0 549 316 Stage 1 - - - - 316 - Stage 2 - - - - 233 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.52 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.608 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1199 - 480 702 Stage 1 - - - - 717 - Stage 2 - - - - 783 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1190 - 463 697 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 546 - Stage 1 - - - - 711 - Stage 2 - - - - 761 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.4 11.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)546 697 - - 1190 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.118 0.082 - - 0.028 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.5 10.6 - - 8.1 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.3 - - 0.1 - 416 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2045 Background [Summer] - PM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 260 30 40 275 45 40 Future Vol, veh/h 260 30 40 275 45 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 22599 Mvmt Flow 292 34 46 316 57 51 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 328 0 702 294 Stage 1 - - - - 294 - Stage 2 - - - - 408 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.49 6.29 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.581 3.381 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1232 - 394 729 Stage 1 - - - - 741 - Stage 2 - - - - 656 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1230 - 379 728 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 482 - Stage 1 - - - - 740 - Stage 2 - - - - 632 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1 12 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)482 728 - - 1230 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.118 0.07 - - 0.037 - HCM Control Delay (s) 13.5 10.3 - - 8 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.2 - - 0.1 - 417 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2045 Background [Summer] - Sat Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 285 35 35 125 25 45 Future Vol, veh/h 285 35 35 125 25 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 44000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 84 84 85 85 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 5 5 15 15 Mvmt Flow 339 42 41 147 32 58 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 385 0 572 343 Stage 1 - - - - 343 - Stage 2 - - - - 229 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.15 - 6.55 6.35 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.245 - 3.635 3.435 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1157 - 460 671 Stage 1 - - - - 691 - Stage 2 - - - - 779 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1153 - 442 668 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 528 - Stage 1 - - - - 688 - Stage 2 - - - - 751 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.8 11.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)528 668 - - 1153 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.061 0.086 - - 0.036 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.3 10.9 - - 8.2 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 - - 0.1 - 418 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2045 Background [Winter] - AM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 450 71 52 125 62 58 Future Vol, veh/h 450 71 52 125 62 58 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 73 73 63 63 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 511 81 71 171 98 92 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 593 0 825 512 Stage 1 - - - - 512 - Stage 2 - - - - 313 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 959 - 312 517 Stage 1 - - - - 556 - Stage 2 - - - - 690 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 958 - 289 517 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 402 - Stage 1 - - - - 555 - Stage 2 - - - - 639 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.7 15.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)402 517 - - 958 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.245 0.178 - - 0.074 - HCM Control Delay (s) 16.8 13.5 - - 9.1 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 0.6 - - 0.2 - 419 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2045 Background [Winter] - PM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 320 45 75 465 80 55 Future Vol, veh/h 320 45 75 465 80 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11001 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 99 99 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 348 49 76 470 98 67 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 398 0 971 350 Stage 1 - - - - 349 - Stage 2 - - - - 622 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1134 - 254 642 Stage 1 - - - - 664 - Stage 2 - - - - 492 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1133 - 237 641 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 350 - Stage 1 - - - - 663 - Stage 2 - - - - 459 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.2 16 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)350 641 - - 1133 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.279 0.105 - - 0.067 - HCM Control Delay (s) 19.2 11.3 - - 8.4 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 0.3 - - 0.2 - 420 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC August 6, 2024        Intersection Capacity Worksheets:  Year 2027 Background+  Project    421 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2027 Project [Summer] - AM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 233 60 47 125 66 55 Future Vol, veh/h 233 60 47 125 66 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 88000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 90 90 70 70 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 2 2 16 12 12 Mvmt Flow 256 66 52 139 94 79 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 330 0 507 264 Stage 1 - - - - 264 - Stage 2 - - - - 243 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.52 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.608 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1229 - 508 751 Stage 1 - - - - 758 - Stage 2 - - - - 775 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1220 - 482 745 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 561 - Stage 1 - - - - 752 - Stage 2 - - - - 742 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.2 11.7 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)561 745 - - 1220 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.168 0.105 - - 0.043 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.7 10.4 - - 8.1 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0.4 - - 0.1 - 422 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2027 Project [Summer] - PM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 215 41 51 228 55 51 Future Vol, veh/h 215 41 51 228 55 51 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 22599 Mvmt Flow 242 46 59 262 70 65 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 290 0 624 244 Stage 1 - - - - 244 - Stage 2 - - - - 380 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.49 6.29 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.581 3.381 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1272 - 438 778 Stage 1 - - - - 780 - Stage 2 - - - - 676 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1270 - 417 777 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 508 - Stage 1 - - - - 778 - Stage 2 - - - - 645 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.5 11.7 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)508 777 - - 1270 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.137 0.083 - - 0.046 - HCM Control Delay (s) 13.2 10.1 - - 8 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.3 - - 0.1 - 423 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2027 Project [Summer] - Sat Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 234 46 57 102 40 66 Future Vol, veh/h 234 46 57 102 40 66 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 44000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 84 84 85 85 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 5 5 15 15 Mvmt Flow 279 55 67 120 51 85 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 338 0 537 283 Stage 1 - - - - 283 - Stage 2 - - - - 254 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.15 - 6.55 6.35 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.245 - 3.635 3.435 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1205 - 483 726 Stage 1 - - - - 736 - Stage 2 - - - - 759 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1200 - 454 723 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 538 - Stage 1 - - - - 733 - Stage 2 - - - - 716 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.9 11.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)538 723 - - 1200 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.095 0.117 - - 0.056 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.4 10.6 - - 8.2 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.4 - - 0.2 - 424 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2027 Project [Winter] - AM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 375 71 52 103 58 58 Future Vol, veh/h 375 71 52 103 58 58 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 73 73 63 63 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 426 81 71 141 92 92 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 508 0 710 427 Stage 1 - - - - 427 - Stage 2 - - - - 283 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1032 - 366 580 Stage 1 - - - - 610 - Stage 2 - - - - 713 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1031 - 340 579 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 445 - Stage 1 - - - - 609 - Stage 2 - - - - 664 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.9 13.8 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)445 579 - - 1031 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.207 0.159 - - 0.069 - HCM Control Delay (s) 15.2 12.4 - - 8.8 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 0.6 - - 0.2 - 425 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2027 Project [Winter] - PM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 266 55 86 387 90 66 Future Vol, veh/h 266 55 86 387 90 66 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11001 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 99 99 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 289 60 87 391 110 80 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 350 0 855 291 Stage 1 - - - - 290 - Stage 2 - - - - 565 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1182 - 299 695 Stage 1 - - - - 708 - Stage 2 - - - - 524 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1181 - 277 694 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 381 - Stage 1 - - - - 707 - Stage 2 - - - - 485 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.5 15.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)381 694 - - 1181 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.288 0.116 - - 0.074 - HCM Control Delay (s) 18.2 10.9 - - 8.3 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 0.4 - - 0.2 - 426 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC August 6, 2024        Intersection Capacity Worksheets:  Year 2045 Background+  Project      427 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2045 Project [Summer] - AM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 280 61 47 150 67 58 Future Vol, veh/h 280 61 47 150 67 58 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 88000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 90 90 70 70 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 2 2 16 12 12 Mvmt Flow 308 67 52 167 96 83 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 383 0 587 316 Stage 1 - - - - 316 - Stage 2 - - - - 271 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.52 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.608 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1175 - 456 702 Stage 1 - - - - 717 - Stage 2 - - - - 752 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1166 - 432 697 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 523 - Stage 1 - - - - 711 - Stage 2 - - - - 718 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2 12.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)523 697 - - 1166 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.183 0.119 - - 0.045 - HCM Control Delay (s) 13.4 10.9 - - 8.2 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0.4 - - 0.1 - 428 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2045 Project [Summer] - PM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 259 43 53 274 55 51 Future Vol, veh/h 259 43 53 274 55 51 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 22599 Mvmt Flow 291 48 61 315 70 65 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 341 0 730 293 Stage 1 - - - - 293 - Stage 2 - - - - 437 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.49 6.29 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.581 3.381 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1218 - 379 730 Stage 1 - - - - 741 - Stage 2 - - - - 637 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1216 - 359 729 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 464 - Stage 1 - - - - 740 - Stage 2 - - - - 605 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.3 12.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)464 729 - - 1216 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.15 0.089 - - 0.05 - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.1 10.4 - - 8.1 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.3 - - 0.2 - 429 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2045 Project [Summer] - Sat Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 284 50 57 124 40 67 Future Vol, veh/h 284 50 57 124 40 67 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 44000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 84 84 85 85 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 5 5 15 15 Mvmt Flow 338 60 67 146 51 86 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 402 0 622 342 Stage 1 - - - - 342 - Stage 2 - - - - 280 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.15 - 6.55 6.35 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.245 - 3.635 3.435 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1141 - 430 672 Stage 1 - - - - 691 - Stage 2 - - - - 738 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1137 - 403 669 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 499 - Stage 1 - - - - 688 - Stage 2 - - - - 694 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.6 11.9 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)499 669 - - 1137 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.103 0.128 - - 0.059 - HCM Control Delay (s) 13 11.2 - - 8.4 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.4 - - 0.2 - 430 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2045 Project [Winter] - AM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 450 50 35 125 40 40 Future Vol, veh/h 450 50 35 125 40 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 73 73 63 63 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 511 57 48 171 63 63 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 569 0 779 512 Stage 1 - - - - 512 - Stage 2 - - - - 267 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 979 - 333 517 Stage 1 - - - - 556 - Stage 2 - - - - 725 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 978 - 316 517 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 421 - Stage 1 - - - - 555 - Stage 2 - - - - 689 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.9 14 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)421 517 - - 978 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.151 0.123 - - 0.049 - HCM Control Delay (s) 15.1 12.9 - - 8.9 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.4 - - 0.2 - 431 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/05/2024 2045 Project [Winter] - PM Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 319 58 88 464 90 66 Future Vol, veh/h 319 58 88 464 90 66 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11001 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - Yield Storage Length - 260 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 99 99 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 347 63 89 469 110 80 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 411 0 995 349 Stage 1 - - - - 348 - Stage 2 - - - - 647 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1121 - 245 643 Stage 1 - - - - 665 - Stage 2 - - - - 479 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1120 - 225 642 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 338 - Stage 1 - - - - 664 - Stage 2 - - - - 441 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.4 16.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)338 642 - - 1120 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.325 0.125 - - 0.079 - HCM Control Delay (s) 20.7 11.4 - - 8.5 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 0.4 - - 0.3 - 432 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt – Vail, CO Traffic Impact Study (FT #24056)      Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC August 6, 2024        Sensitivity Analysis:   Tables &  Intersection Capacity   Worksheets            433 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt ‐ Vail, CO  (FT# 24056) Traffic Impact Analysis                   Intersection and  Lanes Groups Delay LOS Delay LOS DelayLOSDelayLOSDelayLOSDelayLOSDelay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Stop‐Controlled ‐ Summer 1. S. Frontage Road at  Westhaven Drive 3A2A2A4A3A3A3A2A2A4A3A3A    Eastbound Through+Right 0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A    Westbound Left 8A8A8A8A8A8A8A8A8A8A8A8A Westbound Through 0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A   Northbound Left 13 B 15 B 13 B 15 B 16 C 14 B 14 B 17 C 14 B 16 C 18 C 16 C   Northbound Right 10 B 10 B 11 B 11 B 10 B 11 B 11 B 10 B 11 B 11 B 11 B 11 B Stop‐Controlled ‐ Winter 1. S. Frontage Road at  Westhaven Drive 3A4A 4A5A 4A4A 3A5A    Eastbound Through+Right 0A0A 0A0A 0A0A 0A0A    Westbound Left 9A8A 9A8A 9A8A 9A9A Westbound Through 0A0A 0A0A 0A0A 0A0A   Northbound Left 17 C 25 C 21 C 28 D 26 D 32 D 20 C 38 E   Northbound Right 12 B 11 B 13 B 11 B 14 B 12 B 13 B 12 B Note:  Delay represented in average seconds per vehicle. AM Peak PM Peak Sat PeakAM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak AM Peak PM Peak Sat PeakAM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak Table A1 ‐  Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Summary [no eastbound decel/accel lanes] Year 2027 Background Year 2027 Bkgrd + Project Year 2045 Background Year 2045 Bkgrd + Project Fox Tuttle  Transportation Group, LLC 8/6/2024 43 4 Cornerstone Grand Hyatt ‐ Vail, CO  (FT# 24056) Traffic Impact Analysis                   AM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak AM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak AM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak AM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak 1. S. Frontage Road at Westhaven  Drive [SUMMER]Side‐Street Stop Controlled Side‐Street Stop Controlled Side‐Street Stop Controlled Side‐Street Stop Controlled    Eastbound Through+Right ‐ 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0'    Westbound Left 245' 3' 3' 3' 3' 3' 5' 3' 3' 3' 3' 5' 5' Westbound Through ‐ 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0'   Northbound Left 40' 10' 13' 5' 20' 15' 10' 13' 13' 5' 23' 18' 13'   Northbound Right ‐ 5' 5' 8' 10' 8' 10' 8' 5' 8' 10' 8' 13' 1. S. Frontage Road at Westhaven  Drive [WINTER]Side‐Street Stop Controlled Side‐Street Stop Controlled Side‐Street Stop Controlled Side‐Street Stop Controlled    Eastbound Through+Right ‐ 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0'0' 0'    Westbound Left 245' 3' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 8' Westbound Through ‐ 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0'   Northbound Left 40' 15' 38' 30' 48' 40' 50' 20' 65'   Northbound Right ‐ 10' 8' 15' 10' 18' 10' 10' 10' Table A2 ‐  Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue Summary   [no eastbound decel/accel lanes] Intersection and Lanes Groups Existing  Storage Year 2027 Background Year 2027 Bkgrd + Project Year 2045 Background Year 2045 Bkgrd + Project Fox Tuttle  Transportation Group, LLC 8/6/2024 43 5 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2027 Background [Summer] - AM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 233 39 30 125 44 37 Future Vol, veh/h 233 39 30 125 44 37 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 88000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 90 90 70 70 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 2 2 16 12 12 Mvmt Flow 256 43 33 139 63 53 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 307 0 491 286 Stage 1 - - - - 286 - Stage 2 - - - - 205 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.52 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.608 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1254 - 519 730 Stage 1 - - - - 740 - Stage 2 - - - - 806 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1244 - 501 724 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 501 - Stage 1 - - - - 734 - Stage 2 - - - - 784 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.5 11.9 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)501 724 - - 1244 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.125 0.073 - - 0.027 - HCM Control Delay (s) 13.2 10.4 - - 8 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.2 - - 0.1 - 436 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2027 Background [Summer] - PM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 216 28 38 229 45 40 Future Vol, veh/h 216 28 38 229 45 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 22599 Mvmt Flow 243 31 44 263 57 51 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 276 0 612 261 Stage 1 - - - - 261 - Stage 2 - - - - 351 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.49 6.29 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.581 3.381 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1287 - 445 761 Stage 1 - - - - 767 - Stage 2 - - - - 697 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1285 - 429 760 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 429 - Stage 1 - - - - 765 - Stage 2 - - - - 673 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.1 12.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)429 760 - - 1285 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.133 0.067 - - 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.7 10.1 - - 7.9 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.2 - - 0.1 - 437 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2027 Background [Summer] - Sat Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 235 31 35 103 25 44 Future Vol, veh/h 235 31 35 103 25 44 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 44000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 84 84 85 85 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 5 5 15 15 Mvmt Flow 280 37 41 121 32 56 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 321 0 506 303 Stage 1 - - - - 303 - Stage 2 - - - - 203 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.15 - 6.55 6.35 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.245 - 3.635 3.435 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1222 - 504 707 Stage 1 - - - - 721 - Stage 2 - - - - 801 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1217 - 485 704 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 485 - Stage 1 - - - - 718 - Stage 2 - - - - 774 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2 11.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)485 704 - - 1217 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.066 0.08 - - 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.9 10.6 - - 8.1 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 - - 0.1 - 438 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2027 Background [Winter] - AM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 375 50 35 103 36 40 Future Vol, veh/h 375 50 35 103 36 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 73 73 63 63 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 426 57 48 141 57 63 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 484 0 693 456 Stage 1 - - - - 456 - Stage 2 - - - - 237 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1053 - 375 558 Stage 1 - - - - 591 - Stage 2 - - - - 749 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1052 - 357 557 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 357 - Stage 1 - - - - 590 - Stage 2 - - - - 715 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.2 14.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)357 557 - - 1052 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.16 0.114 - - 0.046 - HCM Control Delay (s) 17 12.3 - - 8.6 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0.4 - - 0.1 - 439 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2027 Background [Winter] - PM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 267 42 73 388 80 55 Future Vol, veh/h 267 42 73 388 80 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11001 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 99 99 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 290 46 74 392 98 67 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 337 0 854 315 Stage 1 - - - - 314 - Stage 2 - - - - 540 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1195 - 299 673 Stage 1 - - - - 689 - Stage 2 - - - - 539 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1194 - 280 672 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 280 - Stage 1 - - - - 688 - Stage 2 - - - - 506 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.3 19.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)280 672 - - 1194 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.348 0.1 - - 0.062 - HCM Control Delay (s) 24.6 11 - - 8.2 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 0.3 - - 0.2 - 440 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2027 Project [Summer] - AM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 233 60 47 125 66 55 Future Vol, veh/h 233 60 47 125 66 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 88000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 90 90 70 70 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 2 2 16 12 12 Mvmt Flow 256 66 52 139 94 79 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 330 0 540 297 Stage 1 - - - - 297 - Stage 2 - - - - 243 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.52 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.608 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1229 - 486 719 Stage 1 - - - - 732 - Stage 2 - - - - 775 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1220 - 461 714 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 461 - Stage 1 - - - - 726 - Stage 2 - - - - 742 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.2 12.9 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)461 714 - - 1220 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.205 0.11 - - 0.043 - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.8 10.7 - - 8.1 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 0.4 - - 0.1 - 441 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2027 Project [Summer] - PM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 215 41 51 228 55 51 Future Vol, veh/h 215 41 51 228 55 51 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 22599 Mvmt Flow 242 46 59 262 70 65 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 290 0 647 267 Stage 1 - - - - 267 - Stage 2 - - - - 380 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.49 6.29 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.581 3.381 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1272 - 425 755 Stage 1 - - - - 762 - Stage 2 - - - - 676 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1270 - 405 754 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 405 - Stage 1 - - - - 760 - Stage 2 - - - - 645 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.5 13.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)405 754 - - 1270 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.172 0.086 - - 0.046 - HCM Control Delay (s) 15.7 10.2 - - 8 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0.3 - - 0.1 - 442 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2027 Project [Summer] - Sat Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 234 46 57 102 40 66 Future Vol, veh/h 234 46 57 102 40 66 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 44000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 84 84 85 85 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 5 5 15 15 Mvmt Flow 279 55 67 120 51 85 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 338 0 565 311 Stage 1 - - - - 311 - Stage 2 - - - - 254 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.15 - 6.55 6.35 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.245 - 3.635 3.435 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1205 - 465 700 Stage 1 - - - - 714 - Stage 2 - - - - 759 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1200 - 437 697 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 437 - Stage 1 - - - - 711 - Stage 2 - - - - 716 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.9 12.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)437 697 - - 1200 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.117 0.121 - - 0.056 - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.3 10.9 - - 8.2 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.4 - - 0.2 - 443 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2027 Project [Winter] - AM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 375 71 52 103 58 58 Future Vol, veh/h 375 71 52 103 58 58 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 73 73 63 63 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 426 81 71 141 92 92 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 508 0 751 468 Stage 1 - - - - 468 - Stage 2 - - - - 283 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1032 - 346 549 Stage 1 - - - - 583 - Stage 2 - - - - 713 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1031 - 322 548 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 322 - Stage 1 - - - - 582 - Stage 2 - - - - 664 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.9 16.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)322 548 - - 1031 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.286 0.168 - - 0.069 - HCM Control Delay (s) 20.6 12.9 - - 8.8 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 0.6 - - 0.2 - 444 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2027 Project [Winter] - PM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 266 55 86 387 90 66 Future Vol, veh/h 266 55 86 387 90 66 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11001 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 99 99 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 289 60 87 391 110 80 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 350 0 885 321 Stage 1 - - - - 320 - Stage 2 - - - - 565 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1182 - 287 668 Stage 1 - - - - 685 - Stage 2 - - - - 524 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1181 - 265 667 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 265 - Stage 1 - - - - 684 - Stage 2 - - - - 485 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.5 20.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)265 667 - - 1181 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.414 0.121 - - 0.074 - HCM Control Delay (s) 27.9 11.1 - - 8.3 - HCM Lane LOS D B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 0.4 - - 0.2 - 445 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2045 Background [Summer] - AM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 280 40 30 150 45 40 Future Vol, veh/h 280 40 30 150 45 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 88000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 90 90 70 70 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 2 2 16 12 12 Mvmt Flow 308 44 33 167 64 57 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 360 0 571 338 Stage 1 - - - - 338 - Stage 2 - - - - 233 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.52 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.608 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1199 - 466 682 Stage 1 - - - - 701 - Stage 2 - - - - 783 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1190 - 449 677 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 449 - Stage 1 - - - - 695 - Stage 2 - - - - 761 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.4 12.7 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)449 677 - - 1190 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.143 0.084 - - 0.028 - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.4 10.8 - - 8.1 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.3 - - 0.1 - 446 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2045 Background [Summer] - PM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 260 30 40 275 45 40 Future Vol, veh/h 260 30 40 275 45 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 22599 Mvmt Flow 292 34 46 316 57 51 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 328 0 719 311 Stage 1 - - - - 311 - Stage 2 - - - - 408 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.49 6.29 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.581 3.381 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1232 - 385 713 Stage 1 - - - - 727 - Stage 2 - - - - 656 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1230 - 370 712 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 370 - Stage 1 - - - - 726 - Stage 2 - - - - 632 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1 13.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)370 712 - - 1230 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.154 0.071 - - 0.037 - HCM Control Delay (s) 16.5 10.4 - - 8 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.2 - - 0.1 - 447 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2045 Background [Summer] - Sat Peak Hour Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 285 35 35 125 25 45 Future Vol, veh/h 285 35 35 125 25 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 44000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 84 84 85 85 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 5 5 15 15 Mvmt Flow 339 42 41 147 32 58 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 385 0 593 364 Stage 1 - - - - 364 - Stage 2 - - - - 229 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.15 - 6.55 6.35 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.245 - 3.635 3.435 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1157 - 447 653 Stage 1 - - - - 675 - Stage 2 - - - - 779 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1153 - 429 651 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 429 - Stage 1 - - - - 672 - Stage 2 - - - - 751 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.8 12.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)429 651 - - 1153 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.075 0.089 - - 0.036 - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.1 11.1 - - 8.2 - HCM Lane LOS B B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 - - 0.1 - 448 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2045 Background [Winter] - AM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 450 71 52 125 62 58 Future Vol, veh/h 450 71 52 125 62 58 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 73 73 63 63 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 511 81 71 171 98 92 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 593 0 866 553 Stage 1 - - - - 553 - Stage 2 - - - - 313 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 959 - 294 489 Stage 1 - - - - 531 - Stage 2 - - - - 690 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 958 - 272 489 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 272 - Stage 1 - - - - 530 - Stage 2 - - - - 639 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.7 20 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)272 489 - - 958 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.362 0.188 - - 0.074 - HCM Control Delay (s) 25.6 14.1 - - 9.1 - HCM Lane LOS D B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.6 0.7 - - 0.2 - 449 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2045 Background [Winter] - PM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 320 45 75 465 80 55 Future Vol, veh/h 320 45 75 465 80 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11001 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 99 99 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 348 49 76 470 98 67 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 398 0 996 375 Stage 1 - - - - 374 - Stage 2 - - - - 622 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1134 - 245 621 Stage 1 - - - - 646 - Stage 2 - - - - 492 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1133 - 228 620 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 228 - Stage 1 - - - - 645 - Stage 2 - - - - 459 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.2 23.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)228 620 - - 1133 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.428 0.108 - - 0.067 - HCM Control Delay (s) 32.1 11.5 - - 8.4 - HCM Lane LOS D B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2 0.4 - - 0.2 - 450 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2045 Project [Summer] - AM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 280 61 47 150 67 58 Future Vol, veh/h 280 61 47 150 67 58 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 88000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 90 90 70 70 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 2 2 16 12 12 Mvmt Flow 308 67 52 167 96 83 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 383 0 621 350 Stage 1 - - - - 350 - Stage 2 - - - - 271 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.52 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.608 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1175 - 435 671 Stage 1 - - - - 692 - Stage 2 - - - - 752 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1166 - 412 666 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 412 - Stage 1 - - - - 686 - Stage 2 - - - - 718 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2 14 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)412 666 - - 1166 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.232 0.124 - - 0.045 - HCM Control Delay (s) 16.4 11.2 - - 8.2 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 0.4 - - 0.1 - 451 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2045 Project [Summer] - PM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 259 43 53 274 55 51 Future Vol, veh/h 259 43 53 274 55 51 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 22599 Mvmt Flow 291 48 61 315 70 65 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 341 0 754 317 Stage 1 - - - - 317 - Stage 2 - - - - 437 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.49 6.29 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.581 3.381 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1218 - 367 708 Stage 1 - - - - 723 - Stage 2 - - - - 637 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1216 - 348 707 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 348 - Stage 1 - - - - 722 - Stage 2 - - - - 605 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.3 14.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)348 707 - - 1216 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.2 0.091 - - 0.05 - HCM Control Delay (s) 17.9 10.6 - - 8.1 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0.3 - - 0.2 - 452 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2045 Project [Summer] - Sat Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 284 50 57 124 40 67 Future Vol, veh/h 284 50 57 124 40 67 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 44000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 84 84 85 85 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 5 5 15 15 Mvmt Flow 338 60 67 146 51 86 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 402 0 652 372 Stage 1 - - - - 372 - Stage 2 - - - - 280 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.15 - 6.55 6.35 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.245 - 3.635 3.435 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1141 - 413 646 Stage 1 - - - - 669 - Stage 2 - - - - 738 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1137 - 387 644 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 387 - Stage 1 - - - - 666 - Stage 2 - - - - 694 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.6 13 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)387 644 - - 1137 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.133 0.133 - - 0.059 - HCM Control Delay (s) 15.7 11.4 - - 8.4 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.5 - - 0.2 - 453 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2045 Project [Winter] - AM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 450 50 35 125 40 40 Future Vol, veh/h 450 50 35 125 40 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 73 73 63 63 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 511 57 48 171 63 63 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 569 0 808 541 Stage 1 - - - - 541 - Stage 2 - - - - 267 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 979 - 319 497 Stage 1 - - - - 538 - Stage 2 - - - - 725 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 978 - 303 497 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 303 - Stage 1 - - - - 537 - Stage 2 - - - - 689 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.9 16.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)303 497 - - 978 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.21 0.128 - - 0.049 - HCM Control Delay (s) 20 13.3 - - 8.9 - HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 0.4 - - 0.2 - 454 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Westhaven Drive & S. Frontage Road 08/06/2024 2045 Project [Winter] - PM Peak Hour (no EB aux lanes) Cornerstone Grand Hyatt - Vail, CO Synchro 11 Report Fox Tuttle Transportation Group, LLC Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 319 58 88 464 90 66 Future Vol, veh/h 319 58 88 464 90 66 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 11001 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 245 - 0 40 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 99 99 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 19 26 26 Mvmt Flow 347 63 89 469 110 80 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 411 0 1027 381 Stage 1 - - - - 380 - Stage 2 - - - - 647 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.17 - 6.66 6.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.66 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.66 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.263 - 3.734 3.534 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1121 - 234 616 Stage 1 - - - - 642 - Stage 2 - - - - 479 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1120 - 215 615 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 215 - Stage 1 - - - - 641 - Stage 2 - - - - 441 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.4 26.9 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)215 615 - - 1120 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.51 0.131 - - 0.079 - HCM Control Delay (s) 38 11.7 - - 8.5 - HCM Lane LOS E B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.6 0.4 - - 0.3 - 455 TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: August 26, 2024 SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12- 9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site, located at 1276 Westhaven Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC24-0016) Applicant: PHH Design Development Planner: Greg Roy I. SUMMARY The applicant, PHH Design Development, is requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site, located at 1276 Westhaven Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision. Based upon staff’s review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends The Planning and Environmental Commission forward a recommendation of denial to the Vail Town Council. II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant, PHH Design Development, is requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site, located at 1276 Westhaven Drive. Currently the SDD has available density in terms of both GRFA and dwelling units. A major amendment is necessary for the approval of the development plan. The development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses and activities. The development plan may consist of, but not be limited to, the approved site plan, floor plans, building sections and 456 Town of Vail Page 2 elevations, vicinity plan, parking plan, preliminary open space/landscape plan, densities and permitted, conditional and accessory uses. The Planning and Environmental Commission has held three work session on the project on March 11, 2024, June 10, 2024 and July 8, 2024. Minutes from these meeting are attached. The following items are included for review: Attachment A. Vicinity Map Attachment B. Narrative/Project Description Attachment C. Revised Amendment Materials, June 27, 2024 Attachment D. Revised Plan Set, June 27, 2024 Attachment E. Massing Model Attachment F. March 11, 2023, PEC minutes (Work session) Attachment G. June 10, 2024, PEC minutes (Public Hearing) Attachment H. July 8, 2024, PEC Minutes (Public Hearing) Attachment I. Seter, Vander Wall and Mielke representing Cascade Village Metro District, May 20, 2024 Attachment J. Caplan and Ernest representing applicant response letter, June 24, 2024 Attachment K. Seter, Vander Wall and Mielke representing Cascade Village Metro District, August 8, 2024 Attachment L. Jeff Babb, Vail resorts, memo to PEC, August 9, 2024 Attachment M. Vail Hotel Partners Authorization, June 27-2024 Attachment N. Applicant’s Presentation to the PEC, August 26, 2024 Attachment O. Traffic Impact Study, August 6, 2024 The project is composed of the following components: Dwelling Units The project is proposing thirty (30) for sale dwelling units to be located on the third through eighth floors of the structure. The total proposed GRFA of the dwelling units is 61,469 square feet. Employee Housing Units (EHUs) The project proposes three onsite EHUs, totaling approximately 2,850 square feet and a dormitory style EHU containing 14 sleeping rooms consisting of up to 25 beds and associated common areas (kitchen, bathrooms, laundry facilities, eating and lounge areas) totaling 6,000 square feet located in the CMC building (1310 Westhaven Drive). Per the Vail Town Code, TYPE VII Inclusionary Zoning and Commercial Linkage EHUs are not considered Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) and are thus not deducted from a development’s available GRFA. In addition, EHUs do not contribute to the calculation of dwelling units for purposes of calculating allowable units per acre. 457 Town of Vail Page 3 Housing Plans within SDDs are approved by the Town Council as part of the recommendation from the PEC. Commercial The project includes approximately 5,632 square feet of retail/restaurant space located along the paseo and retail plaza on the lowest level. Indoor Public Amenity The project includes space designated for restrooms, public lockers, and ticketing. Outdoor Public Amenity Outdoor public amenities include the bus turnaround/drop off area, upper plaza with public covered escalator and elevator, retail plaza, paseo and courtyard with summer and winter programming. Parking The project proposes 67 on-site parking spaces for the residential units on one level of parking which is the second story of the structure. The project proposes to utilize excess parking in the Aria building for the parking generated by the commercial uses and EHUs. Changes to SDD No. 4 Cascade Village Dwelling Units and GRFA The proposed changes to the SDD, Area A, are relatively minimal and include an overall reduction in GRFA and a decrease in the number of dwelling units. This reduction in GRFA (and dwelling units) is a result of the difference between the two previous 2008 approvals; Cascade Residences (30,227 sq. ft net new GRFA and 14 new units in the CMC building) and Cornerstone (48,407 sq. ft GRFA and 22 units) compared to one larger Cornerstone proposal of 62,299 sq. ft. of GRFA and 30 units. The result is a reduction in the Area A of 16,335 sq ft of GRFA and 6 units. Easements Cascade Village Metro District and the applicant have both brought up legal opinions concerning the compatibility of proposed development with the easement language. These opinions have been included as Attachments I and J. The Metro District provided a follow up memorandum that is included as Attachment K. It is neither staff’s role nor that of the Planning and Environmental Commission to make a determination regarding these matters. It is upon legal advice from the Town’s Counsel that this private matter should play no role in the decision making of the Commission. Vail Resorts has provided an email indicating that additional discussions with the applicant will occur after the PEC recommendation process has completed (Attachment L). Approval from the Cascade Metro District and Vail Resorts would be required prior to the issuance of any building permit. 458 Town of Vail Page 4 The applicant is in discussions with Holy Cross Energy concerning the relocation of an existing electrical easement and also with ERWSD concerning location of the water line. Preliminary plans indicate that the relocation of the electrical lines and easement can occur without impacting the proposed development plan. The water line has been shown going through the site but has not been located in that area. The exact location is still unknown but is believed to be within the shown water easement. This water line easement on the northeast corner of the lot that continues through the Liftside property that would be the presumed new location of the water line should it be found to exist outside of the easement currently. ERWSD has indicated that there is water dedication for the site. The Conditional Capacity to Serve letter has not been provided to staff at the time of writing this report. Approval for the relocation of lines and easements from ERWSD and Holy Cross Energy will be required prior to the issuance of any building permit. Parking Ordinance No. 5, Series of 2016 replaced a previous parking chart with the following as an accurate tally, at that time, of parking requirements in Area A: 459 Town of Vail Page 5 It is this chart that demonstrates the availability of 38 excess parking spaces . With the discontinuation of other uses (fitness club), the true excess parking may be greater. Admittedly these numbers are often in a state of flux. Staff believes that the use of a portion of the excess identified in 2016 for the EHUs and the commercial uses in the Cornerstone development is acceptable. At the previous PEC meeting, the size of the spaces were discussed and their conformance with Town Code. The applicant has included a plan to restripe 103 spaces 460 Town of Vail Page 6 to a conforming size that meets Town Code requirements without the loss of any existing spaces. This would allow for the new parking spaces (24 spaces) required for the proposed commercial uses to meet the minimum required by town code. With the six spaces for the employee housing unit the 30 required spaces fall within the surplus of 38 spaces noted in the ordinance and leave eight additional spaces for any potential future use. The restriping for the portion of spaces required by this proposal is required and the additional spaces being brought into conformance is not required, but voluntary , as they have previously been approved. Loading There is no proposed loading berth within the building. The combination of residential square footage and commercial uses within the building would require two berths, that could be reduced to one berth with the credit for multiple uses. The applicant is proposing to utilize the loading berths within the CMC building to accommodate the incremental need proposed with this project. Proposed Deviations from SDD No. 4 The project proposes to deviate from the following requirements of the SDD: • The SDD requires that all parking for the Cornerstone building be located on the Cornerstone parcel. The project proposes to utilize the parking garage for the 24 spaces generated by the commercial component and for two spaces generated for from one of the three EHUs located within the Cornerstone building. The two other EHUs having parking located within the Cornerstone building. • Maximum height for the Cornerstone development of 71 ft. The project proposes a maximum overall height of 97 ft. Public Benefit 2024 Per Section 12-9A-9 “Before the Town Council approves development standards that deviate from the underlying zone district, it should be determined that such deviation provides benefits to the town that outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation.” The full list of proposed public benefits starts on page 76 of the applicant’s presentation (Attachment N). On property benefits are listed as access plaza and the lower level plaza that provides the connection between the skier drop-off and the ski lift. Off-site improvements include the skier drop-off area, which was proposed with the 2008 major SDD amendment (a list of the public benefits proposed with the 2008 approval is listed in the background section below). The listed “2c” and “2d” benefits include the paseo directly south of the proposed building on the Grand Hyatt property and extends to the west to encompass the 461 Town of Vail Page 7 courtyard and entryway’s to the paseo from Westhaven drive and the Grand Hyatt drop- off area. These improvements have been approved by the property owner (Attachment M). To ensure that these improvements would be open to the public in perpetuity, a public access easement would need to included over the shown area of “2c” and “2d” as proposed. Public benefit also includes wayfinding, the retail included in the building, and an art program. The 2008 approval of the Cornerstone project, at a maximum height of 71’, included a number of offsite pedestrian and vehicular related infrastructure improvements. In addition to the proposed bus turnaround and pedestrian drop off , these included Westhaven Drive turn lanes and associated medians, a sidewalk from skier portal to Frontage Road on both side of Westhaven Drive (now partially completed) and a 10' separated walk along Frontage Road from Western PL of the Conference/Pool area to Eastern PL of the Liftside development. Other possible improvements that could be considered as a public benefit include additional Frontage Road sidewalks and implementation of the "Road Diet" improvements along the Frontage Road as identified in the Vail Mobility & Transportation Master Plan. Staff would encourage consideration of these infrastructure improvements as possible public benefit. Determination of Use Per the Vail Town Code, determination of permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be made by the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council as a l part of the formal review of the proposed development plan. The SDD requires that the ground floor uses within Area A to be those allowed on the first floor in the Commercial Core 1 zone district. The application proposes a ski club (owners lounge) use that is only permitted in the basement or garden level. A determination as to the appropriateness of the proposed use will be necessary. The application was amended to significantly reduce the frontage of the owner’s lounge with the inclusion of an additional retail space prior to the July 8th meeting. There have been no additional changes to this area since the previous meeting. Proposed Uses in General The Cornerstone proposal includes the following uses that are permitted uses within Area A of the Cascade Village SDD: • First floor commercial uses including retail and restaurant uses • Multifamily dwellings • Employee Housing Units These uses are also supported by the Vail land Use Plan designation of RAS, Resort Accommodations and Service. 462 Town of Vail Page 8 III. BACKGROUND Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, was adopted by Ordinance No. 4 Series of 1976. At least twenty amendments have occurred between 1977 and 2008. The subject property was a Planned Unit Development under Eagle County jurisdiction then annexed in 1975. SDD No. 4 includes the following areas: Area A Cascade Village Area B Coldstream Condominiums Area C Glen Lyon Primary/Secondary and Single Family Lots Area D Glen Lyon Commercial Site Area E Tract K The entire Cascade Village SDD is approximately 97.5 acres. Because the property was annexed into the Town of Vail as a Planned Unit Development under Eagle County jurisdiction and early Special Development Districts were not based on underlying zoning, there is no underlying zoning for Cascade Village. Uses and development standards for the entire property are as outlined in the adopting ordinance for Special Development District No. 4. The Cornerstone site is located south of Westhaven Drive, between the Liftside Condominiums and the Grand Hyatt Hotel Terrace Wing and conference center. The total site area is 0.6977 acres in size and slopes steeply from Westhaven Drive to the hotel terrace and Cascade Village chairlift level. The chairlift is located immediately adjacent to the site and a public pedestrian easement allows for access across the site from Westhaven Drive to the chairlift. The adjacent Waterford site (Liftside Condominiums) and the Cornerstone site are the only two development parcels within the SDD permitted to establish separate development plans. In 1992 the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission recommended approval of the development plan for the Waterford (Liftside Condominiums) and Cornerstone buildings; the Vail Town Council subsequently approved the development plan via Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1993. The Cornerstone portion of the approval was not constructed. In 2008, a Cornerstone project was again reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission, forwarding a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council. The Town Council ultimately approved the application via Ordinance No. 5, Series of 2008 but required a number of changes. Most notably was lowering the height of the west wing from 91’ to 71’, in keeping with the maximum height in the SDD and requiring a minimum of 50% of the required EHUs to occur within the building. The development plan approval expired on June 1, 2017, following a series of extensions. 463 Town of Vail Page 9 In 2016, the Vail Town Council approved a major amendment to SDD No. 4 via Ordinance No. 5, Series of 2016. This major amendment was for a minor reduction in the number of accommodation units and related GRFA in the hotel. Also at this time, the parking table was re-established finding a surplus of 38 spaces. Of these spaces, 26 were allocated to the hotel for future development. This application would redirect a portion of this surplus to the commercial uses in the Cornerstone building and the development of the EHU dormitory in the CMC building. IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Staff finds that the following provisions of the Vail Town Code are relevant to the review of this proposal. Title 12 – Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code Chapter 1 – Title, Purpose, and Applicability (in part) 12-1-2: PURPOSE: A. General: These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town, and to promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of high quality. B. Specific: These regulations are intended to achieve the following more specific purposes: 1. To provide for adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities. 2. To secure safety from fire, panic, flood, avalanche, accumulation of snow, and other dangerous conditions. 3. To promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and to lessen congestion in the streets. 4. To promote adequate and appropriately located off street parking and loading facilities. 5. To conserve and maintain established community qualities and economic values. 6. To encourage a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consistent with municipal development objectives. 464 Town of Vail Page 10 7. To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land with structures. 8. To safeguard and enhance the appearance of the town. 9. To conserve and protect wildlife, streams, woods, hillsides, and other desirable natural features. 10. To assure adequate open space, recreation opportunities, and other amenities and facilities conducive to desired living quarters. 11. To otherwise provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community. Chapter 9 – Special and Miscellaneous Districts (in part) 12-9A-1: PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY: A. Purpose: The purpose of the special development district is to encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of the new development with the town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail comprehensive plan. An approved development plan for a special development district, in conjunction with the property's underlying zone district, shall establish the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the special development district. 12-9A-4: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES: A. Approval of Plan Required: Prior to site preparation, building construction, or other improvements to land within a special development district, there shall be an approved development plan for said district. The approved development plan shall establish requirements regulating development, uses and activity within a special development district. B. Preapplication Conference: Prior to submittal of a formal application for a special development district, the applicant shall hold a preapplication conference with the department of community development. The purpose of this meeting shall be to discuss the goals of the proposed special development district, the relationship of the proposal to applicable elements of the town's comprehensive plan, and the review procedure that will be followed for the application. C. PEC Conducts Initial Review: The initial review of a proposed special development district shall be held by the planning and environmental commission at a regularly scheduled meeting. Prior to this meeting, and at the discretion of the administrator, 465 Town of Vail Page 11 a work session may be held with the applicant, staff and the planning and environmental commission to discuss special development district. A report of the department of community development staff's findings and recommendations shall be made at the initial formal hearing before the planning and environmental commission. Within twenty (20) days of the closing of a public hearing on a proposed amendment, the planning and environmental commission shall act on the petition or proposal. The commission may recommend approval of the petition or proposal as initiated, may recommend approval with such modifications as it deems necessary to accomplish the purposes of this title, or may recommend denial of the petition or rejection of the proposal. The commission shall transmit its recommendation, together with a report on the public hearing and its deliberations and findings, to the town council. D. Town Council Review: A report of the planning and environmental commission stating its findings and recommendations, and the staff report shall then be transmitted to the town council. Upon receipt of the report and recommendation of the planning and environmental commission, the town council shall set a date for hearing within the following thirty (30) days. Within twenty (20) days of the closing of a public hearing on a proposed SDD, the town council shall act on the petition or proposal. The town council shall consider but shall not be bound by the recommendation of the planning and environmental commission. The town council may cause an ordinance to be introduced to create or amend a special development district, either in accordance with the recommendation of the planning and environmental commission or in modified form, or the council may deny the petition. If the council elects to proceed with an ordinance adopting an SDD, the ordinance shall be considered as prescribed by the Vail town charter. 12-9A-6: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: An approved development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses and activities of special development districts. A development plan shall be approved by ordinance by the town council in conjunction with the review and approval of any special development district. The development plan shall be comprised of materials submitted in accordance with section 12-9A-5 of this article. The development plan shall contain all relevant material and information necessary to establish the parameters with which the special development district shall develop. The development plan may consist of, but not be limited to, the approved site plan, floor plans, building sections and elevations, vicinity plan, parking plan, preliminary open space/landscape plan, densities and permitted, conditional and accessory uses. 12-9A-9: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Development standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking shall be determined by the town council as part of the approved development plan with consideration of the recommendations of 466 Town of Vail Page 12 the planning and environmental commission. Before the town council approves development standards that deviate from the underlying zone district, it should be determined that such deviation provides benefits to the town that outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation. This determination is to be made based on evaluation of the proposed special development district's compliance with the design criteria outlined in section 12-9A-8 of this article. VAIL LAND USE PLAN Land Use Plan Designation: RAS Resort Accommodations and Service This area includes activities aimed at accommodating the overnight and short-term visitor to the area. Primary uses include hotels, lodges, service stations, and parking structures (with densities up to 25 dwelling units or 50 accommodation units per buildable acre). Goals and Policies (in part): 1.0 General Growth/Development 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.2 The quality of the environment including air, water and other natural resources should be protected as the Town grows. 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 2.0 Skier/Tourist Concerns 2.1 The community should emphasize its role as a destination resort while accommodating day skiers. 5.0 Residential 5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist. 5.3 Affordable employee housing should be made available through private efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail with appropriate restrictions. 467 Town of Vail Page 13 5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and upgraded. Additional employee housing needs should be accommodated at varied sites throughout the community. V. ZONING / SDD NO. 4 ANALYSIS Address: 1276 Westhaven Legal Description: Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision Existing Zoning: Special Development District No. 4 (no underlying zone district,) Existing Land Use Designation: Resort Accommodations and Services Mapped Geological Hazards: None Standard Allowed/required Proposed Site Area N/A 30,393 sq. ft. Setbacks Set per development plan North 0’ South 6’ East 0’ West 0’ Height 71’ 97’ Density (onsite) Per development plan 30 DUs 43 DU/acre GRFA Per development plan 62,299 sq. ft. GRFA Area A 354,837 sq. ft. 339,695* sq. ft. Site Coverage Per development plan 79.5% of the site. (24,152 sf / 30,393 sf). Site Coverage (Area A) Maximum 45%, 44% Landscaping Per Development Plan 20.5%, which includes 1,745 square feet of planted area Onsite Parking All parking on the Cornerstone site 67 spaces, offsite provisions for commercial uses and EHUS • Reduction comes from the difference between the approved Cascade Residences and 2008 Cornerstone projects not being built and the proposed Cornerstone. VI. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Existing Land Use Zoning District North: Parking Structure/Liftside Condos SDD No. 4 East: Common Area/Open Space/Rec SDD No. 4 South: Grand Hyatt Hotel/Glen Lyons Sub SDD No. 4 West: Grand Hyatt Hotel SDD No. 4 VII. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGN CRITERIA 468 Town of Vail Page 14 Before acting on a special development district application, the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed special development district. 1. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. Overall Compatibility The Applicant is proposing a major amendment to the special development district for the Cornerstone site which is the last development site within Area A, and therefore presents opportunities to complete the overall plan for the Cascade Village and provide amenities to the larger community. Staff suggests that the following improvements will enhance the site's compatibility, and as public benefits, will greatly improve the character, identity, and visual integrity of the neighborhood: • Enhanced skier passageway/entry portal to Cascade Village Chairlift; • Creation of the snow-melted paseo connecting the hotel/resort to the new development and the chairlift • Enhanced pedestrian plaza area between existing Terrace Wing the proposed Cornerstone Building; and • Creation of bus turn around and skier drop off. The site is currently home to the ticket office and skier drop -off/stairs down to the ski lift. The proposed improvements to those areas, while maintaining those uses, is compatible with the remainder of Cascade as it is one of the few sites that has seen minimal to no improvement since it was originally built. The escalator and public elevator connecting the drop-off area to the ski lift level is an improvement to the existing staircase. Similarly, the proposed ticket office and restroom facility is an improvement to the existing facilities. In terms of the proposed uses and facilities, they are upgrades of the existing uses today which are compatible with the overall site. Compatibility with neighborhood and adjacent properties The maximum permitted heights for buildings within Area A per SDD #4 (Ordinance No. 5, Series of 2016) are as follows: • The maximum height for the Vail Cascade Resort and Spa, CMC Learning Center, Terrace Wing, Plaza Conference Building and Cascade Parking Structure/Athletic Club is 71 feet. 469 Town of Vail Page 15 • The maximum height for the Cornerstone property is 71 feet. • Liftside Condominiums Building: Maximum height in feet as measured from finished grade to any portion of the roof along the north elevation shall be 55 feet (South Frontage Road), 56 feet along the west elevation (Westhaven Drive), and 65 feet along the south and east elevation as measured from finished grade. The proposed building has two separate wings as viewed from the north. The eastern wing is closest to the Liftside building and extends approximately 45 feet from the roadway, with an overall height on the south side of 71 feet. This is slightly lower than what was permitted for Liftside as viewed from Westhaven drive. The 71 feet comes from the slope of the site and how the southern side drops from Westhaven drive by 26 feet, resulting in a height of 71 feet. This is within the permitted height as noted by the SDD. The west wing of the building is separated from the eastern wing by the drop-off plaza level. The west wing has a height in this location of approximately 59.5 feet, which is slightly above what was permitted in the immediate area. However, as the building extends further west towards the hotel the grade continues to drop along the front of the site. The height of the building begins to step up in this location instead of falling with the grade of the site. The tallest portion of the building on the north elevation is located in the center of the building with the roof articulation and additional floor which extends to approximately 79.5 feet in this area. As the grade also falls to the south the tallest portion of the building mass results in a height of 97 feet. This additional height increases the scale and bulk of the building as well and is generally not compatible with the adjoining properties. The architectural design and character of the building are notably different than the hotel, CMC building and adjoining Liftside Condominiums which share a distinct architectural character. Further down Westhaven Drive, the Westhaven Condos have a similar, but different architectural theme with limited shed roofs and dormers without the hips. Metal roofing is used in all the buildings in the area as well as a strong stone base with wooden accents or siding, but stucco is the predominant material. The proposed material board includes wood, stone, metal roofing, but also has metal panels and fiber cement for siding. While not the same as the surrounding buildings, the materials are present in the buildings in the rest of town . The building materials, while not the exactly the same or utilized in the same proportions, are compatible to the neighborhood. Incorporation of stucco into the proposed material board should be considered at the Design Review Board stage to enhance the architectural connection to the immediate area. 470 Town of Vail Page 16 The proposed setbacks for the building are generally ten feet to zero feet, with the exception of where the escalator and ticket office is located on the inside corner, which has a setback of 25 feet. In the included setback analysis, there are examples of setbacks that are as low as zero feet from property lines or within ten feet of property lines. There are also examples of setbacks extended into the hundreds of feet where the buildings front their property lines along Gore Creek. As an internal lot bounded by Westhaven Drive and buildings on two sides, the lot is unique. The programming on the south side is similar to the village core and lionshead as a pedestrian area with commercial adjacent. In this location the minimal setback would be appropriate to be similar to those areas in CC1 and LMU1 where setbacks are zero or ten feet, respectively. The west side of the building also has a minimal setback with stairs and landscaping proposed off-property. Due to the nature of the adjacent building, there is little impact to the form or function of that space as a result of the small setback. The north setback is similar to the hotel building to the west and portions of the CMC building further down Westhaven. This provides a consistent setback along that side of the street. The northeastern and east setbacks are the portions of the site where the parking and paseo level setback differ from the building setback. The parking and paseo level extend to the property line while the building that extends above is set back approximately ten feet. Additional treatment to the lower levels that are on the property line should be considered to alleviate any impacts to users in the area. While there are components of the Cornerstone project that are compatible and sensitive to the neighborhood and adjacent uses, the buildings mass, scale, and height result in this criterion not being met. 2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. The proposed uses, which include multifamily dwelling units, EHUs, limited commercial (retail/restaurant) and skier services are all uses by right and appropriate for the site. The proposed development plan does combine a portion of units and GRFA for development Area A that was previously spread between this site and the CMC building. The proposal would decrease the overall allowed units from 36 units to 30 units and reduce the GRFA from 78,634 SF to 62,299 SF. The location of the density within development Area A would be appropriate as it is a continuation of residential use in the higher density portion of the development area. The CMC building is the portion of development Area A that transitions to the lower density portion of the SDD and would be best to not increase density and produce a larger building in that location. The commercial uses and skier services, located on the lowest floor the pedestrian plaza and paseo will help activate the area and provide much needed energy. It provides a complimentary use to the hotel site and ski lift within the Cornerstone lot 471 Town of Vail Page 17 where most appropriate. The area immediately adjacent to the plaza/paseo is best suited to commercial use compared to a residential use that would have privacy and access concerns. Collectively, the uses, activity and density provide a compatible and workable relationship with the surrounding hotel and resort uses of Cascade Village. Staff finds this criteria to be met. 3. Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title. The required parking for the residential component of the project will be occur on the Cornerstone parcel with the commercial and EHU generated parking accommodated in the Aria parking garage, utilizing existing surplus spaces. The Aria garage was constructed under Eagle County jurisdiction prior to annexation . Many if not most of the parking spaces do not comply with the Town of Vail standard for indoor space of 9’ by 18’. The applicant has committed to restriping existing spaces to result in a minimum of 30 conforming spaces to correspond with the requested use of the facility by the new development. This will result in a remaining eight spaces in the garage that are above the current day requirements. Loading is proposed to be accommodated by the loading dock located at the CMC building. This will require transporting goods for the commercial uses via the paseo and will require a formal agreement from the property owners to ensure this is continued in perpetuity. The CMC building loading dock is currently used by the hotel for its loading and delivery and has the sufficient space to accommodate the additional loading needs for the proposed commercial and residential uses. Staff finds this criteria to be met. 4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans. Vail Land Use Plan The goals contained in the Vail Land Use Plan are to be used as the Town's policy guidelines during the review process for the amendment of a special development district. Staff has reviewed the Vail Land Use Plan and believes the following goals, objectives and policies are relevant to the review of this proposal: Vail Land Use Plan 1.0 General Growth/Development 472 Town of Vail Page 18 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to seNe both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 2.0 Skier/Tourist Concerns 2.1 The community should emphasize its role as a destination resort while accommodating day skiers. 5.0 Residential 5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist. 5.3 Affordable employee housing should be made available through private efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail with appropriate restrictions. 5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and upgraded. Additional employee housing needs should be accommodated at varied sites throughout the community. Land Use Plan Designation: RAS Resort Accommodations and Service This area includes activities aimed at accommodating the overnight and short -term visitor to the area. Primary uses include hotels, lodges, service stations, and parking structures (with densities up to 25 dwelling units or 50 accommodation units per buildable acre). The Vail Land Use Plan notes the Cascade as being the “third portal” to Vail Mountain and being the “third node” of urban development in the Town. This area was envisioned to be similar to Vail Village and Lionshead as a place for skier services and retail to accommodate guests on the mountain. This proposal is in line with this plan as adding more commercial services for skiers as well as a n improvement to the entrance to the mountain and access to the ski lift. 473 Town of Vail Page 19 Staff believes the proposed development generally furthers the above referenced goals, objectives and policies and, therefore, is in general compliance with the Vail Comprehensive Plan. Staff finds this criteria to be met. 5. Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. According to the Official Town of Vail Geologic Hazard Maps, the Cornerstone development site is not located in any geologically sensitive areas or within the 100-year floodplain of Gore Creek or its tributaries. Staff finds this criteria to be met. 6. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The proposed site plan is responsive to its location and utilizes the full site while accommodating for the change in grade from Westhaven Dr to the ski lift area. The building and its lowest floor uses integrate well with the paseo, linking the development, the chair lift and the existing hotel and resort. The skier passageway with escalator and elevator is an integral design feature, that creates and entryway from the drop-off area to the ski lift that is immediately adjacent to the site. The proposal includes the off-site paseo, courtyard and on-site commercial uses to provide open space for pedestrian use that is unique to it’s location. There are few other sites in town that have skier access and the current access today is underutilized and lacking in the vibrancy present at the other three access points. The aesthetic quality of the site will be improved through this development with the added entry and the addition of the commercial space and public gathering area between the hotel and the proposed Cornerstone building. The landscaping for the proposal is provided almost exclusively off-site in the adjoining right-of-way or on the hotel’s property. This is similar to Vail Village and Lionshead, where the majority of landscaping for sites is provided along the pedestrian areas. While a departure from it’s current day open space and trees that results from the site being vacant, this is in line with the long term vision for the site to be a node of access for the mountain. The building design does provide for visual interest from Westhaven Dr as well as the paseo level. There is articulation in the building massing and decks break up the 474 Town of Vail Page 20 façade. At the plaza level there is a deck overlooking the ski lift and a stone base that extends along the lower level that grounds the structure and breaks up the two lowest levels from the separate wings above. The building is well articulated and proportioned and brings a visual interest to the site where none exists today. Staff finds this criteria to be met. 7. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation. Access to the single floor parking garage occurs at grade directly from Westhaven Drive to the west of the proposed snow melted bus turnaround and passenger vehicle drop off. Public Works has reviewed the proposed skier drop-off/bus turn around area and does not have any concerns or comments. The proposed design is similar to what was approved previously and will formalize the turnaround area that exists today and prevent misuse of that area of the right of way. The provided traffic impact study provided there will be little to no impact on the study area as a result of the proposed project being built. Pedestrian access from Westhaven Drive is predominately through the skier passageway to the lower skier plaza. Secondary pedestrian access occurs via a stairway at the west end of the proposed building. The proposed entryway represents an improvement that will enhance access to the ski lift. The drop-off area combined with the escalator and elevator will provide handicap access that is not present today and will accommodate a variety of mountain users that may not be able to access the ski lift today. Staff finds this criteria to be met. 8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. The project includes minimal yet appropriate onsite landscaping, predominantly along the street edge and within the skier plaza. Significant landscape enhancements are proposed along the paseo linking the project to the hotel and greater resort. As previously mentioned, this is akin to the villages where pedestrian access is prioritized over landscaped area. Landscaping is used to soften the appearance of the buildings compared to usable space and is appropriate for the proposal. Staff finds this criteria to be met. 9. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. 475 Town of Vail Page 21 A phasing plan is not contemplated with this proposal. All work including improvements not on the Cornerstone parcel will be completed concurrently. As conditioned, a Construction Site Management Plan will be required that will ensure safe and appropriate access for the public to the Cascade Chairlift during construction. Also as conditioned, approval from effected entities including the Cascade Metro District, Vail Resorts, ERWSD, and Holy Cross Energy will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Staff finds this criteria to be met. VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of denial to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12 -9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site, located at 1276 Westhaven Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision and and setting forth details in regard thereto. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to recommend denial of this request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion: “The Planning and Environmental Commission recommends denial to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site, located at 1276 Westhaven Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision and setting forth details in regard thereto.” Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to recommend denial of this request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission make the following findings: 1. The SDD does not comply with the standards listed in Section VIII of this memorandum, or the applicant has not demonstrated that one or more of the standards is not applicable; 2. The SDD is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the development objectives of the town; 476 Town of Vail Page 22 3. The SDD is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding areas; and 4. The SDD promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality.” Alternative Motion: Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to recommend approval, with conditions, of this request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion: “The Planning and Environmental Commission recommends approval, with conditions, to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12 -9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site, located at 1276 Westhaven Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision and setting forth details in regard thereto.” Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission include the following conditions: Conditions: 1. This application shall require review and approval from the Town of Vail Design Review Board. 2. This application shall begin construction of the development within three years from the time of its final approval and continue diligently toward the completion of the project. 3. Prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall record deed restrictions with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder, in a format approved by the Town Attorney, for the Type VII-IZ and Type VII-CL Employee Housing Units. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a construction site management plan and parking plan showing how the construction of this site will not impact town parking, ensure bus operations and maintain safe access to the Cascade Chairlift. 5. Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall install a snowmelt system within the bus turn around, pedestrian drop off area and sidewalks 477 Town of Vail Page 23 and shall enter into the standard snowmelt agreement with the Town of Vail. The applicant shall be responsible for providing the heat source, and the on -going maintenance of the sidewalk and snowmelt system. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall engage Art in Public Places Board on the determination of an acceptable public art installation(s) with a minimum value of $150,000.00. The art shall be installed, or surety posted, prior to any certificate of occupancy. 7. Prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy, that applicant shall record a public access easement with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder, in a format approved by the Town Attorney, for perpetual public access over and across the paseo and associated pedestrian areas, generally following described areas 2C and 2D as shown on slide 87 of the applicant’s August 26, 2024, presentation. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement to include but not limited to the following items: • An agreement for the use of the loading dock at the former CMC building for the uses associated with the Cornerstone Development. • An agreement for the perpetual use of 30 parking spaces within the Aria garage for the parking requirements associated with the commercial spaces within the Cornerstone Development and the dormitory style EHU located on the basement level of the CMC Building. • Demonstration of measures to assist in meeting Town of Vail sustainability goals and objectives. • Construction and maintenance of the bus turnaround and pedestrian drop off area. • Offsite vehicular and pedestrian improvements as determined by the Vail City Council. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, approval from Cascade Village Metro District and Vail Resorts concerning use of existing easements and the relocation of the ticket office and associated facilities. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, approval from ERWSD, and Holy Cross Energy concerning the relocation of water and electrical lines and associated easements shall be required. 11. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, outstanding comments provided from Public Works shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer. 12. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate that a minimum of 30 parking spaces located within the Aria Garage have been restriped to meet the Town code. 13. Prior to submitting for DRB review, the applicant shall remove any impediments including fencing shown within the pedestrian access easement. 478 Town of Vail Page 24 14. Prior to submitting for DRB review, the applicant shall provide a conditional capacity to serve from ERWSD. 15. Prior to submitting for building permit, the applicant shall provide the ability to serve letter from ERWSD. 16. Prior to submitting for DRB review, the applicant shall supply a preliminary drainage report. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to recommend approval, with conditions, of this request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission make the following findings: 1. The SDD does comply with the standards listed in Section VIII of this memorandum, or the applicant has demonstrated that one or more of the standards is not applicable; 2. The SDD is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the development objectives of the town; 3. The SDD is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding areas; and 4. The SDD promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality.” IX. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A. Vicinity Map Attachment B. Narrative/Project Description Attachment C. Revised Amendment Materials, June 27, 2024 Attachment D. Revised Plan Set, June 27, 2024 Attachment E. Massing Model Attachment F. March 11, 2023, PEC minutes (Work session) Attachment G. June 10, 2024, PEC minutes (Public Hearing) Attachment H. July 8, 2024, PEC Minutes (Public Hearing) Attachment I. Seter, Vander Wall and Mielke representing Cascade Village Metro District, May 20, 2024 Attachment J. Caplan and Ernest representing applicant response letter, June 24, 2024 479 Town of Vail Page 25 Attachment K. Seter, Vander Wall and Mielke representing Cascade Village Metro District, August 8, 2024 Attachment L. Jeff Babb, Vail resorts, memo to PEC, August 9, 2024 Attachment M. Vail Hotel Partners Authorization, June 27-2024 Attachment N. Applicant’s Presentation to the PEC, August 26, 2024 Attachment O. Traffic Impact Study, August 6, 2024 480 Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes Monday, August 26, 2024 1:00 PM Vail Town Council Chambers Present: David N Tucker William A Jensen John Rediker Scott P McBride Brad Hagedorn Robyn Smith Absent: Robert N Lipnick 1. Virtual Link Register to attend the Planning and Environmental Commission meeting. Once registered, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining this webinar. 2. Call to Order 3. Main Agenda 3.1 A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12- 9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the covered parking, the construction of five new free-market condominiums, one new employee housing unit, and associated site improvements at Coldstream Condos, located at 1476 Westhaven Drive, Lot 53, Glen Lyon Subdivision and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC24-0017) Planner: Heather Knight Applicant Name: Coldstream Ltd., represented by High Summit PEC24-0017 Staff Memo.pdf Attachment A. Coldstream Condos - Vicinity Map.pdf Attachment B. Applicant Narrative.pdf Attachment C. Architectural Plan Set.pdf Attachment D. Site Grading Plan.pdf Attachment E. Title Commitment.pdf Attachment F. 2012 PEC Memo and Worksession.pdf Attachment G. PEC Minutes, September 24, 1990.pdf Attachment H. Town Council Minutes, October 2, 1990.pdf Planner Knight gives a presentation. She talks about the history of the SDD and the subject site. She walks through the proposed development and site plan. She talks about the criteria for approval. Hagedorn asks about the setbacks above grade versus below grade. Knight clarifies. Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of August 26, 2024 1 481 Smith asks if this would require a variance if it was HDMF (High Density Multi-Family)? Knight confirms. Smith asks about the public benefit. Knight says they would contribute $100,000 towards the general housing fund or to improve the bike path in that area. Rediker asks where public benefit fits into the criteria? Roy says it’s not part of the criteria or findings, it is decided by Town Council. The PEC can give their input, but it’s not part of the criteria for the decision today. Hagedorn confirms that the setback variation is specific to this development, Knight confirms. Rediker asks for clarification on the site plan in regard to the parking garage. The applicant is represented by Sean Hanagan, Henry Pratt, and Greg Finch. Hanagan talks about the history of the site and the proposed plan. He talks about the proposed public benefits, including a $100,000 contribution towards the pedestrian path or general housing fund. Pratt talks about the retaining walls and garage on the west end of the proposal. Hanagan walks through the elevations and the landscape plan. Rediker asks for some clarification as to the southwest corner of the proposal. Rediker and Pratt discuss retaining walls and setback in this area. Hagedorn asks about counterforts, Pratt says they are hypothetical, the engineering hasn’t been completed yet. Rediker and Pratt discuss the garage entrances. Smith asks about the compatibility criteria. Pratt says the color of the gravel will match. Finch says the project has gone through a lot of iterations. Landscaping in that area could be a challenge, owners in that area are also concerned about their views being preserved. Hanagan adds that not having a public space there adds some privacy to the EHU. There are economic factors, and people on that end are concerned about losing their sunlight. Smith asks how they got to the $ 100,000 figure for public benefit. Fish says the project has been kicked around 12 years, the economics are the reason. The fire lane requirements required some reworking, it was a number that was arrived at that they thought the HOA and the Town would live with. Smith asks about the EHU requirements on past projects, Pratt says the previous second EHU was intended to be a management unit, that need went away. Hanagan says they took into consideration current housing costs and deed-restriction conversion costs for a comparable unit and determined that $100,000 was appropriate. Jensen says an EHU here would have significantly more value than Timber Ridge. It’s hard to project the value of that unit right now, but it’s higher than what you estimated. Jensen and Finch discuss the EHU. Finch says it is a big risk for the HOA. Jensen says heated indoor parking versus what was there, increases the value of the property. Hanagan mentions that public benefit is not a criteria for approval, it’s commensurate to the ask in the deviations. Knight says they are above the EHU requirements, it is a 1,200 sf unit when 1,000 sf is the requirement. Jensen says he’s not arguing against the contribution, thinks it’s a good number. Our role is to represent Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of August 26, 2024 2 482 the community but it’s not our decision it’s the Town Councils. Agrees that it does meet the requirement for the EHU. Tucker Jones is a board member on the HOA, the owners want to improve this property, but an HOA is like herding cats. It will be a tough sell when owners vote on assuming this debt and liability. Smith asks about the process. Knight says Council has the final say on the public benefit and it will go to Council before DRB. Rediker discuss storm sewer with Town Engineer Tom Kassmel. Hanagan and Knight talks about the recreation fee. Rediker asks for public comment. Renee Miles is a resident of Coldstream and commends the applicants and staff. They have been owners since 2008, they are supportive of the project, particularly as it will help mitigate the impact of Alura to the south. Rediker closes public comment. He asks for commissioner comment. Tucker says it is an artful way to meet the criteria. Knowing the site, you’ve done a good job of fitting everything in and a solution that is feasible. Smith says the purpose of the SDD is to encourage flexibility and creativity. This is a fantastic project overall that will add to the value of the community. The setback and GRFA requests are warranted. The flat roof where there used to be an EHU should be up to DRB. Will withhold approval, don’t think the public benefit is commensurate. Council should be the one negotiating on what an appropriate public benefit is. Jensen says it’s a good project and creative. No issue with GRFA or garage setback. It benefits the community and diminishes the impact of the adjacent project to the south. It’s not our responsibility to weigh in on public benefit, Council will address that, supports the application. Hagedorn thanks applicants, it’s a creative way to address deficiencies. This is a win-win, the GRFA ask is mitigated, replacing mass within a similar development area. Setback ask is mitigated because its below grade, the project is well under allowable density on unit basis, the EHU square footage is going beyond the requirement. Suggests the public benefit contribution is used for housing. Rediker says there is a plan that meets the criteria. Setbacks are ok as they are below grade, concerned about walls on north side that are flat and not attractive, which impacts massing negatively. But the DRB will look at compatibility, concerned about what that wall will look like from a design perspective. Concerned about trap for overflow, what you have will go in and comply with Town Code, need to maintain that. Agrees that the criteria are met. McBride agrees that criteria are met, concerned about the setback any disputes that might arise with the closeness to property line. On the whole a creative proposal and a lot of thought has gone into this. Agrees with Hagedorn, a great use might be with respect to deed restrictions. Hagedorn adds a bioswale at the edge of the culvert would be a good idea. William A Jensen made a motion to Recommend for approval with the conditions on page 14 of the staff memo and the findings on page 14- 15; Brad Hagedorn seconded the motion Passed (5 - 1). Voting For: William A Jensen, Brad Hagedorn, John Rediker, Scott P McBride, David N Tucker Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of August 26, 2024 3 483 Voting Against: Robyn Smith 3.2 A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site, located at 1276 Westhaven Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC24-0016) Planner: Greg Roy Applicant Name: PHH Design Development PEC24-0016 Staff Memo August 26, 2024.pdf Attachment A. Vicinity Map.pdf Attachment B. Narrative-Project Description.pdf Attachment C. Amendment Materials June 27, 2024 Update.pdf Attachment D. Part 1.pdf Attachment D. Part 2.pdf Attachment D. Part 3.pdf Attachment D. Part 4.pdf Attachment D. Part 5.pdf Attachment E. Massing Model.pdf Attachment F. March 11, 2024 PEC minutes (Worksession).pdf Attachment G. June 10, 2024 PEC Minutes (Public Hearing).pdf Attachment H. July 8, 2024, PEC Minutes (Public Hearing).pdf Attachment I. Seter, Vander Wall and Mielke representing Cascade Village Metro District, May 20, 2024.pdf Attachment J. Caplan and Ernest representing applicant response letter, June 24, 2024.pdf Attachment K. Seter, Vander Wall and Mielke representing Cascade Village Metro District, August 8, 2024.pdf Attachment L. Jeff Babb, Vail resorts, memo to PEC, August 9, 2024.pdf Attachment M. Vail Hotel Partners Authorization, June 27, 2024.pdf Attachment N. Applicant’s Presentation to the PEC, August 26, 2024_Part1.pdf Attachment N. Applicant’s Presentation to the PEC, August 26, 2024_Part2.pdf Attachment N. Applicant’s Presentation to the PEC, August 26, 2024_Part3.pdf Attachment N. Applicant’s Presentation to the PEC, August 26, 2024_Part4.pdf Attachment O. Traffic Impact Study, August 6, 2024.pdf Roy gives a presentation. He walks through the history of the application. He talks about the history of the SDD. He walks through the site plan and proposed public benefits. Rediker asks about the potential easement for a paseo. Roy says there would need to be an easement to allow public access, in the event ownership to change. He talks about the Housing requirements. He talks about the criteria, Staff found it is not compatible with height and did not meet criteria 1, so the staff recommendation is a recommendation of denial. Jensen asks about the previous approvals. Roy says there was a 2008 approval, the SDD was approved with those amendment. Development plan was re-approved, approval extended until 2017 when it expired. They were never rolled back in the SDD language. Overall the amount of GRFA and number of units in planning area A is going down with the amendment. Jensen asks how do the previous approval weigh in to this? Roy says the proposed height is a deviation from what is set down in the SDD. Roy clarifies the owner’ lounge on the floor plans. Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of August 26, 2024 4 484 Rediker asks for clarifications on the parking, which is one of the deviations. Roy walks through the existing and proposed numbers on the site plan. The ski club is a determination of use as part of the SDD. Rediker asks about the intent of having commercial parking onsite. When you’re trying to satisfy parking requirements, is there not concern that they’re not fulfilling parking onsite when you’re dealing with a potential third party offsite that could cut off the parking. Roy says that is why the code treats it that way, so the parking is onsite. Tucker asks would that weigh into the public benefit consideration. Roy says not specifically, as that situation exists in the villages today. Rediker brings up the housing requirements. Roy walks through the calculations for commercial linkage and inclusionary zoning, the applicants are proposing three EHU units within Cornerstone to meet the linkage requirements and a dormitory unit within CMC to meet the inclusionary zoning. Jensen asks what is the community intent with EHUs? Is the dormitory the intent of the zoning requirements? Roy says it can be requested, subject to the discretion of the review body. Dormitories have been approved, like in the Highline and Four Seasons, although the layout and specifics were different. Smith walks through the square footage requirements for housing mitigation. Rediker asks about occupancy restrictions for dormitory EHUs, Roy says it is one person occupying the space year-round with the exception of 3 months? Smith asks about the new fire truck, can that truck appropriate service this development as proposed? Kassmel says it would be up to the Fire Marshall. Roy says the Fire Department has reviewed this application and did not have concerns. Smith asks how the public art contribution was arrived at, Roy says it was proposed by applicant. The AIPP will review public art. Alonso Ruiz de Velasco is representing the applicant. He talks about the ownership situation in Cascade. Gabby Voeller with SE Group is part of the applicant team, says the tennis court are in a different zone district. Velasco walks through the existing conditions. He talks about easements on site. He talks about the building height and shadow study. Smith asks what the plan is if these units are not accepted as employee housing mitigation. Velasco says they have put money towards this and are hoping it can be accepted as mitigation. Hagedorn says this seems to be a business decision, how is this additive? Seems to be disconnected from the housing requirement. Velasco says they had the vision of satisfying the need for the hotel, Cornerstone created the opportunity to pursue this in parallel. We are investing a fair amount of money into this, high standards, high quality. Roy says per the EHU requirements, the employees of that specific project don’t have to occupy that space. Other business employees can be housed there as long at they meet the deed restriction requirements for employment. Hagedorn says on other projects with dormitories, the housing was developed in tandem with that project, it was clear that it was done to satisfy it. Here we have dormitories that are currently being built, they need deed restrictions to be occupied. Tucker says the public benefit pitch included employee housing to mitigate the deviations. Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of August 26, 2024 5 485 Smith says it is a convenient double dip. Hagedorn asks if staff has concerns, Roy says its not exact but similar to the mitigation bank. He talks about the particulars of the Highline approval. Roy says it will have to be deed restricted, that’s the only way it can be permitted under zoning as there are no free- market dorms and adding free market units would have required a Major SDD Amendment application. Rediker, down the road can the owner tear out the dormitories if it wasn’t built fulfilling any requirements? Roy says it would be subject to employee housing exchange program at that point. Roy says there are two different paths, the first is the employee exchange program if it was outside of Cornerstone. If it was part of Cornerstone, they would have to come in for an amendment. EHUs satisfy the community housing need, they don’t have to be specific to the development. Voeller says because both buildings are within Area A, they are considered on-site. Smith asks how that differs from the parking condition for on site. Voeller says they wanted the residences to have parking within Cornerstone, and then the commercial parking spaces be across the street. Smith asks for clarifications on square footage, 5700 sf and 25 beds in dormitory. Smith discusses size of employee housing units in the code, wants to understand the requirements and the ask. Velasco continues presentation. Talks about landscaping and signage, as well as public benefits. Hagedorn says the height has been a concern since the beginning but the 97’ has stayed static. Appreciates the changes with the ski club, is there a reason why the height has not been changed? Velasco says we’re not looking at this as a standalone project, we’re trying to integrate it with the village. We do believe what we’re proposing to give matches up with what we’re asking for. There are improvements to the skier access among others. Hagedorn says the site visit hammered home the scale of that space. The 97’ from the paseo level, looking at comparisons you can see that marked difference. You’re viewing this as future compatibility not current compatibility? Velasco says that’s a good way to say it. Rediker asks for more detail on the building heights of the west wing. Velasco walks through the elevation. The first overhang on the east side stands at 86’ from the paseo level. The peak of the roof is at 97’ above the paseo. The western edge is 60’ from Westhaven and 86’ from the paseo. Smith is concerned about the proximity of the heated paseo to the lift and the ability to retain snow. This is an impervious surface very close to download area. Velasco says they will have those conversations. Rediker asks about off-site parking for commercial uses. Its good they have common ownership, but what happens down the road if those assets are split up? What guarantees to we have in the future that the Aria building will accommodate parking for the commercial site? Velasco says its hard to guarantee but we can see the example of how it was originally developed. The Aria building accommodated the parking for all the developments. Cornerstone should be added to that list. Roy says if it changed ownership in the future, it would remain in the SDD as spaces for that use. Per the code it can be met, but the Town doesn’t get involved with future management or how spaces are Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of August 26, 2024 6 486 allocated inside the development. He gives examples of recent inquiries in other parts of town. Rediker asks if there is anything stopping a future owner from changing the parking use. Roy says they would be looking at an amendment and how the new use related to the parking table. Velasco says we’re coming back to where this site was 40 years ago, when it was under common ownership. The guarantee stands on what would be allowed to be done if it were to change ownership. Right now we want to take advantage of the existing infrastructure. McBride asks about the height. Velasco says its 97’ at the high point of the west wing, this is showing the perceptions of how it is perceived at different areas. McBride asks how that compares to other buildings in Town. Roy says off the top of his head there are maybe two or three that are a similar height. Rediker opens public comment. Mark Lessons lives in Cascade. There is a tractor trailer on Westhaven Drive to feed the hotel that has been there two weeks. You have to drive around that, if the hotel is part of this project that should be addressed as we look at the whole project. Westhaven gets clogged up because of this activity. Mark Waddell lives in Millrace, has concerns with basic operations and congestion in the area. The single lane in and out creates safety issues. When you force this entire neighborhood into two lanes, it doesn’t work. Supports development in general, but they have gotten greedy on this project. Walked through the new J1 housing, it’s the worst design in Vail. If there’s a kitchen fire there is extreme risk. They will exit through a side door and walk on to Millrace private property. How are they going to get to any place they can recreate or enjoy themselves? Grateful for their contribution to the community. Please look at the natural choke points that have been created for the safety of the community, it won't work. Scott Wagner is a Glen Lyons resident, on the board of the metro district. Their conversations with the applicants have been through an attorney. We have yet to have discussions with the applicants about this. The landscaping in the roundabout will not work well, concerned about taking away deceleration lane. Regarding the public benefits there is a lot of take and no give. The escalator is called a public benefit, there are existing escalators in the area that break all the time and have to be serviced out of Denver. Doesn’t understand how the turnaround will be partially heated, the rest is cleared by snowplows. The shade on the street will cause issues, the paseo will entail maintenance. Haven’t heard anything about a drainage study, there is a lot of impervious area. Part of the parking garage is deeded as public parking with TOV, also agreement with Vail Resorts, haven’t seen that in the calculations. The paseo stays dark most of the time, it’s not an extra benefit. What are the public benefits from past approvals in the SDD? The hotel height is not 71’ to his knowledge, it’s shy of 60’. Not in agreement on 97’ of proposed height, 71’ was a past agreement that expired and doesn’t know the concessions for that. Jill Tenenbaum lives in Millrace. Concerned about one way in and out, this is going to create horrible conditions and road congestion. Very pro building, but they’re trying to put an elephant in in a Volkswagen. Concerned about parking, won’t be enough for the retail. We don’t have enough space in the village for what this organization wants to do, they’re putting us all in a precarious situation. Don Guidry owns property in the neighborhood. Not against it, but they need to reduce the scope. Kim Gudmundson is in Millrace. Concerned about ticket office idea, that building will now be in a private building. Who has control over the maintenance? Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of August 26, 2024 7 487 Janie Lipnick lives in Westhaven and is on the metro board. Shares concerns with others, height and bulk will ruin views and cast shadows. Not anti development, just want smart development, also concerned about traffic in and out. Also concerned about no dedicated loading for Cornerstone. Lorenza Cardenas is on the Liftside board. Concerned about setbacks, and the height. After July 8 meeting, they presented a letter with concerns. Concerns are still being ignored and there are slim to none public benefits. The turnaround will cause lots of traffic, where is Liftside supposed to exit? Where is landscaping in the project? The height, scale, and bulk are not compatible and will stick out. 97’ height conflicts the most, the neighbors are around 56’. Request for variations exacerbate the real and perceived bulk and mass. David Foster is counsel to Nolegio partners in Liftside. There are a number of concerns that are covered in the design criteria and necessary findings, in particular compatibility to immediate environment. The PEC has identified height, setbacks are not compatible in previous meetings and there have been no changes. Regarding the comprehensive plan, we’re within resort land use with a maximum density of 25 units per acre, this proposal is 43 dwelling units per acre. This isn’t a master plan, it’s specifically for this site, the conversations about the other properties have been very confusing, which in some respects is on site and some respects off site. Doesn’t understand how reducing the size helps in a use determination, that is now how that is made. Robert Rosen is director of the metro district, agrees with other public comment. No one has spoken to the directors of the metro district. They own the existing ticket office, the applicants don’t have the right to tear it down, it is the board’s property. The proposal interferes with the access to the lift, the metro district has a responsibility to maintain both, doesn’t see how they could agree with that. The height is not acceptable, they don’t have the right to put the escalator or stairs on property that is controlled by the metro district. The PEC or Town Council cant take that away, the district has an obligation. Kim Seter, attorney for cascade metro district prepared a list of issues to be addressed. If you choose to recommend approval, condition #9 the use of those easements affects agreements between metro district and Vail Resorts. There is also a memo from Vail Resorts from August 9th. These two entities combine to operate and control the easement. Jaime Kalb is a Liftside owner, supports comments of other neighbors, concerned about access to lift. This is an ambitious project for a small space. David Flowers says the size of the building is too big for the space. Will create congestion in area that is already congested. If Vail Resorts upgrades lift, this proposal will add more congestion and take away a lot of the views. Rediker closes public comment. He asks for commissioner comment. Rediker brings up loading and delivery, trucks potentially blocking traffic, is that going to be a problem with Cornerstone? Velasco says it will not be a problem with Cornerstone, he’ll look into the comments which is really the operation of the hotel. Rediker asks if the delivery will happen through the existing loading dock. Velasco says for Cornerstone yes. Rediker asks about garbage disposal. Velasco says it will work in inverse to the loading. There are back of the house areas where it would be temporarily stored before being disposed. Rediker asks if dumpsters will be rolled from the paseo level to the CMC building? Velasco says they have not figured out the details of that yet. Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of August 26, 2024 8 488 Smith says trash trucks back down the CMC dock. It’s a valid point but it may have also been worse in recent weeks. Rediker asks staff about easement concerns, we have been directed by town attorney that we are not considering those issues in regard to the nine criteria. Roy confirms, that is the direction from the town attorney. There is a condition regarding the approval from the easement holders prior to building permit. Rediker, what about Liftside concern of parking access with the new configuration? Kassmel says the intent is that Liftside would still enter generally how they do today, the drop off would be two -way, that was the intent in 2008. They would not have to go through the skier dropoff or bus traffic. Kassmel and Rediker discuss access to the Liftside parking under the proposal. Velasco says there is a traffic study which suggested there would be no changes to the deceleration lane. Jensen says as presented he can’t support this, surprised that the mass and scale haven’t changed. Don’t see supporting anything taller than what is allowed. Can’t agree to the owners club as presented, not consistent with town code. The EHU in CMC is not the appropriate location for this project. The parking solution does work, if you lower the mass and scale there will be less required parking which is beneficial to the whole community. Smith thanks applicants. This process is not over, you have to go to council. A lot of valid points in public comment, the application fails to meet criteria 1,2,4, and 9. EHU’s housing is the priority and this fails to meet the code, the housing variations requested are too much of an ask. Dorms became a problem because of the spread of infectious disease. Tucker thanks applicants. It’s a tough site, the mass and scale doesn’t meet the criteria. We’ve brought this up every time, and nothing has changed. It’s insane to try and run all the loading through that dock, there’s got to be another solution. The delivery guys will start using the skier drop off. What about drainage? McBride thanks applicants. Concerned about outstanding issues that haven’t changed, you’re trying to extract every last penny from this property and you’re entitled to that but have to do it within the rules. Haven’t seen enough to change my mind, staff has recommended it not be approved, surprised not to see significant changes. Rediker thanks applicant. Staff put together a good memo, raises a lot of good things about the project, not talking about public benefit which Council will evaluate. It’s a benefit to Town to have this site developed, a lot of aspects of this project make it better. There are some things that are still a concern, first is height of the west building, scale, and bulk as well but height is the biggest concern with zero setbacks. The height is not sensitive to the immediate environment, concerned about garbage disposal. Concerning about criteria #3, parking and loading. There is a public benefit to reorganizing that drop off area, escalator would be safer than those existing stairs. Somewhat concerned about criteria #7, traffic and circulation. You’ve identified a lot of benefits, but the size and height of the west building is not compatible, it should step down as you get further west, wish we had seen a change there. Smith discusses criteria that was not met. Robyn Smith made a motion to Deny with the findings on page 21-22 of the staff memo, amended to does not comply with each and every of the necessary four findings; William A Jensen seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0). Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of August 26, 2024 9 489 3.3 A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6 (Vail Village Inn), pursuant to Section 12-9A, Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for modifications to the approved development plan, and for residential and commercial additions and associated site improvements, located at 68 East Meadow Drive, Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC24-0032) This item has been withdrawn. No action is necessary. Planner: Jamie Leaman-Miller Applicant Name: Village Inn Plaza, represented by Current Architects 4. Approval of Minutes 4.1 PEC Results 8-12-24 PEC Results 8-12-24.pdf (McBride & Tucker abstain) Robyn Smith made a motion to Approve ; William A Jensen seconded the motion Passed (3 - 0). 5. Information Update Rediker brings up sand and oil filters. What are the regulations with regard to maintenance and enforcement. Jensen agrees, says it should be looked at given the amount of money we put into protecting Gore Creek. Roy says they will consult with the Environmental department on potential next steps. 6. Adjournment Robyn Smith made a motion to Adjourn ; David N Tucker seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0). Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of August 26, 2024 10 490 From:Scott Wagner To:PublicInputTownCouncil Subject:Cornerstone Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024, First Reading Date:Monday, November 4, 2024 4:14:07 PM Vail Council Members, I am writing to voice my concerns regarding the application of PHH Design Development requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village),The Cornerstone Project. His applicant has presented many times at the PEC meetings beginning last March. There have been no revisions to their plans since the inception, except to accommodate the Owners skier lounge. My concerns are the following: No Drainage study has been submitted They have not addressed or mentioned anything about a water separator in their garage to handle the sediment from the melt off of vehicles. Their public benefits are a stretch at best, we already have a ticket office; public bathrooms; Skier access; ice rink that’s hardly open; to name a few of them. They have not addressed how they will dispose of the trash from this building nor a plan to handle the trash. Their proposed delivery for the public restaurants is utilizing an already taxed area of the hotel behind the CMC building. The proposed turnabout is impeding access to Liftside Conodominiums. The proposed turnabout is a heated surface that joins the city street which is not, will there be an issue with the buildup of snow at that junction, creating a trip hazard for pedestrians and safety concerns for vehicles crossing the bump. The height and massing of the project does not meet code requirements. I could go on but I am sure you have heard several more or will hear several more at the public comment session. The developer has failed to reach out to the neighborhood for any dialog, even though we have suggested that we are willing to meet with them. I appreciate you taking the time on this matter and reading my concerns. Sincerely, Scott Wagner 1225 Westhaven Lane Scott Wagner 303-915-6006 491 From:Gary Hanna To:PublicInputTownCouncil Subject:Cornerstone Project Date:Monday, November 4, 2024 12:02:02 PM Town Council: My family owns a home on Gore Creek across from lift 20 and the proposed Cornerstone project. For the record, please note our strong objection to the construction plans as submitted. This will be severely detrimental to many adjoining property owners while benefiting only the builders. Additional concerns with drainage, congestion, parking, etc. should also be noted. Please deny this proposal as was recommended by your advisory committee. Thank you. Gary Hanna 1210 Westhaven Lane Get Outlook for iOS 492 From:Stanley Beard To:PublicInputTownCouncil Subject:Cornerstone Project Date:Monday, November 4, 2024 2:43:49 PM I am co-owner, along with my wife, of the duplex located at 1275 Westhaven Circle Pacel A. I am 100% against this outrageous proposal for the following reasons: 1. Removing the bus stop. I assume it will be moved to the frontage road, which will interfere, if not close, the existing acceleration lane, which with all of the added traffic, will be needed more than ever. CDOT put the lane there for safety, especially in the winter. 2. Losing the skier drop off. 3. Moving the public ticket office to private location controlled by the developer. 4. Ridiculous cascading tower like structure on the back side greatly crowding the lift line and generally restricting what is now used as a public area and sticking out like a sore thumb. 5. Taller by far than any existing structure in the subdivision. Should be limited to existing. 6. Unattractive architecture out of character with the neighborhood. 7. This developer is trying to cram way too much onto this parcel. 8. The construction will be a nightmare for all entering the subdivision. The only thing more absurd than this developer trying to force this ridiculous project on our Cascade Village/Glen Lyon neighborhood is the fact that TOV has let it get this far. Yours truly, Stan Beard Stanley S. Beard Phone: 432.683.4824 Fax: 432.683.4834 Cell: 970.390.1230 493 From:Glenn Lyons Neighborhood To:PublicInputTownCouncil Subject:Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024 Date:Monday, November 4, 2024 1:57:52 PM Attachments:Data_All_241103 with comments.pdf Dear Council members, We are writing today to present the Survey results from a survey that was sent to the Glenlyons neighborhood in regards to the Cornerstone building project. We sent the survey to convey the concerns of the neighborhood in the easiest form, rather than having a letter from each household or trying to obtain signatures from each household. This survey was sent in late August in preparation for a PEC meeting that was subsequently postponed. At the time, we had 48 neighbors that received the survey. We sent the survey summary rather than the individual results; those are available should you want or need them. Thank you for your consideration, Glenlyons Neighborhood. 494 From:Thad King To:PublicInputTownCouncil Subject:Proposed Cornerstone Site Development Date:Monday, November 4, 2024 3:55:37 PM To the Vail Town Council: This is to inform you that the owners of units in Liftside Condominiums, 1234 Westhaven Drive, by and thru the Board of Directors of Liftside Condominium Association are opposed to the request for approval of a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed-use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site, located at 1276 Westhaven Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision. The proposed Cornerstone building plans and requested amendments to SDD No. 4 are wholly incompatible and inconsistent with the intents and purposes of SDD No. 4 and would result in a project that would be foreign within the context of Cascade Village Development Area A. We are of the opinion that the 2008 approval of a Cornerstone project for development has expired and should not be a basis from which the new proposed development is to be evaluated, but even if it were, a comparison of what was approved then and what is proposed now clearly demonstrates that the current proposed plan would results in a project disproportionate in height, massing and design from the approved 2008 project. The differences between the standards and allowances approved in the 2008 SDD No. 4 amendment and the proposed SDD allowances for the Cornerstone site are: Building Height: 71 Feet Approved (2008) 97 Feet Requested (37% increase); Density: 22 Units Approved (2008) 30 Units Requested (36% increase); GRFA: 48,407 sq. ft. Approved (2008) 62,299 sq. ft. Requested (29% increase); Parking: Entirely Onsite Approved (2008) Partially Offsite Requested; Furthermore the proposed setbacks being proposed and lack of adequate landscaping further aggravate the inappropriate proposed massing of the project. SDD No. 4 establishes no setbacks for the Cornerstone site. Like the Liftside Condominiums site, setbacks for the Cornerstone site are to be established via the site-specific development plan approved by the Town Council. The Applicant is proposing zero-foot setbacks on three sides of the Cornerstone Parcel. This is unlike any other parcel in Development Area A and is unjustified and unnecessary to allow for reasonable development of the site. A 2015 survey by Eagle Valley Surveying of the entirety of Development Area A shows the 495 existing (constructed) building footprints for each developed parcel within Development Area A along with property boundaries. Scaling the survey, it does appear that in most other parcels that have already been developed (Parcel 1 - Terrace Site; Parcel 2 - Plaza Site; Parcel 3 - Cascade Club Condominiums/Parcel 8 - Parking Lease Sites; Parcel 5 - Colorado Mountain Condominiums Site), there are instances where building footprints are located at or near property lines in certain areas of those sites. A key distinction is that those sites and those lot lines where buildings are at or near property boundaries back up to or front along open space tracts or public right-of-ways (Westhaven Drive or South Frontage Road, for example). In most instances, though, the other setbacks on those sites (Liftside, the Terrace Site, Colorado Mountain Condominiums, and the Plaza sites) are generous, ranging from 10 feet to 30 feet between building footprints and the next nearest property line, thus allowing for proper setbacks to ensure that buildings are situated within each parcel so as not to overwhelm, overpower, or negatively impact buildings on adjacent parcels. It is not apparent that proper justification for any of the variations sought by the Cornerstone Applicant has been presented to the Town of Vail in this case. Rather, the Applicant is asking for increases in height (37%), increases in density (36%), and increases in GRFA (29%), along with significant decreases in minimum setbacks without providing any justification for the variances sought. The proposed amendment and, specifically the proposed design of the Cornerstone building, is not compatible with, responsive or sensitive to, or in conformance with the surrounding environment, the neighborhood, or adjacent properties relative to aesthetic qualities as articulated in the proposed building’s architecture, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. Rather, the design – the building height, mass, scale, bulk, architecture, roof form and design, and character of the proposed Cornerstone building - is unlike any other building within Development Area A. One of, if not the most objectional amendments proposed by the Applicant is to allow for a total height of the Cornerstone building of 97 feet above the Plaza Level. This is particularly out of character for Development Area A especially given the height of the two adjacent buildings (Liftside and the Grand Hyatt Hotel). The height of the hotel is 56 feet and height of Liftside along the frontage road is 55 feet, 56 feet along the west (Westhaven Drive) side, and 65 feet along the south side (to accommodate or account for the significant grade change from the frontage road to the Gore Creek side of the Liftside parcel). The proposed height of the Cornerstone project combined with the design of the roof forms (unlike any found throughout Development Area A), along with requests for no setbacks on three sides of the building exacerbate the real and perceived bulk and mass of the structure. Most structures existing throughout Development Area A exhibit “hip” roof elements, with relatively low/typical plate heights (floor to floor heights), and with upper floors integrated into roof (with dormers). Hip roof designs are extremely effective in lowering the perceived height and mass of structures and are reflective of a traditional European vernacular. Within Development Area A, it is apparent that the intent of the developer of Cascade Village – and the intent of SDD No. 4 – was and is to ensure that structures were elegantly understated, and that roof designs and forms were to be used to lower the perceived height of 4-5 story structures. In stark contrast, the proposed Cornerstone roof design and roof forms are completely foreign to the overall design and character of existing buildings within Development Area A. The proposed Cornerstone building employs “butterfly” roof elements. These roof forms add significant bulk and mass (and height) by projecting roof elements 496 upward, rather than sloping downward. It is completely incompatible and inconsistent with the surrounding character and design of the surrounding parcels within Development Area A – introducing roof elements and designs completely foreign to the established built environment – while adding significant mass, bulk, and height to the structure. Although the proposed design for Cornerstone can be viewed as compatible within the larger context of design and architectural style found in the Village and Lionshead areas of Vail, the materials, textures and scale of the building are generally inconsistent with the existing built environment within Development Area A. Simply put, buildings within Cascade Village are fairly understated, with white stucco/plaster, use of natural stone at lower levels, and simple hip roof forms. In contrast, the proposed Cornerstone building introduces a multitude of materials, construction techniques, and architectural detailing that would be compatible in Vail Village, but is otherwise foreign in context to the surrounding environment in Development Area A. The Cornerstone plan “Sun/Shade” analyses (Sheets A-20 thru 21) shows the sun and shade angles – with and without the Cornerstone building – at different times of year. While these analyses are helpful to understand the potential impacts of the proposed Cornerstone building, particularly on Westhaven Drive and the Liftside parcel, they should be updated to provide more useful information. For instance, analyses were produced for the spring equinox, fall equinox, and winter solstice. The summer solstice should also be used to add to the adjacent property owners’ understanding of potential impacts at different times of day in the spring, summer, fall and winter. Additionally, the times used in the analyses are 10:00am and 2:00pm. In reviewing the spring and fall equinox analyses, they depict shading at 10am and 2pm, apparently the times with least impact (i.e., the shade from the Cornerstone building would be located just west of the Liftside outdoor space/pool area at 10am and just east of the same area at 2pm). However, if the hours between 10am and 2pm were shown, such analysis would show that Liftside pool area is completely in shade. Finally, the sun/shade analyses should be updated to show or model a Cornerstone building shorter in height (as measured from the plaza side) to demonstrate the difference in potential impact between a shorter height limitation and the requested height of 97 feet. The East building in the Cornerstone project is in closest proximity to the Liftside Condominiums. The East building is proposed to be 71 feet in height; and while the design includes roof forms that slope downward on the east elevation, thus introducing the least impactful design closest to Liftside, there are still potential revisions that could further lessen potential impacts to Liftside Condominiums. For instance, the extended roof overhang element with kickers shown on the east elevation adds mass and potentially additional shading to the north, impacting Liftside. Additionally, the plans call for the northeast corner of the Cornerstone building to have balconies at each floor/unit. Those balconies would face Liftside Condominiums and would allow Cornerstone residents/guests to look directly down onto the Liftside pool deck. If possible, we would request that the developer review the floor plans, as it may be possible to flip the floor plan for the East building so the elevator shaft (located along the north side of the building) shifts to the east and the units with balconies shift to the west, therefore reducing 497 potential privacy concerns and impacts to Liftside unit owners. With regard to landscaping, the proposed Cornerstone plans indicate a lack of landscaping along the north and east elevations of the building due to reduced or non-existent setbacks and because of the building design. This should be regarded by the Town as an area of non- compliance. In conclusion, in our opinion: 1. The Applicant should be required to provide justification to support the requested variations (similar to providing rationale of an extraordinary circumstances at the Cornerstone site that would place undue burden or “hardship” on the developer without granting of increased height and density or decreased setbacks). 2. The Town and/or the Applicant should analyze and compare the proposed Cornerstone site setbacks to the existing conditions throughout Development Area A using existing surveys and aerial mapping/GIS, or historic development plans of record at the Town. Such analysis should be aimed at either presenting evidence to support reduced or zero-foot setbacks at the Cornerstone site, or to contrast the request by Cornerstone with the existing conditions established at other parcels in Development Area A. 3. The Town and/or the Applicant should analyze and compare the proposed Cornerstone site coverage to existing conditions throughout Development Area A using existing surveys, aerial mapping/GIS, or historic development plans of record at the Town. Such analysis should be aimed at either presenting evidence to support 80 percent site coverage, or to contrast the request by Cornerstone with the existing conditions established at other parcels in Development Area A. 4. The Town or the Applicant could calculate existing site coverage for other developed parcels within Development Area A using surveys and aerial mapping to estimate how the Cornerstone site compares to other parcels within Development Area A. 5. The Applicant should be required to lower the total height of the project while also revising the roof design to eliminate the butterfly elements and, in areas where sun/shade analyses show additional impacts from oversized roof overhangs/kicker elements, to reduce overhangs and the prominence of kickers. The design as presented should be viewed by the Town as incompatible and inconsistent with the intent of SDD No. 4 and, importantly, the surrounding character and scale of the surrounding environment. 6. The Applicant should be required to update and revise the sun/shade analyses provided to specifically add an analysis at the summer solstice; to include analyses showing the Cornerstone building at a maximum height of 71 feet (measured from the plaza or lowest point); and to include analyses at different times (11am-2pm) during spring and fall equinox as well as summer solstice. 7. The Applicant could be encouraged to investigate redesign of the East building to effectively flip the floor plans so that unit balconies fact northwest toward Westhaven Drive and Aria rather than Liftside Condominiums, while shifting the location of the elevator shaft. Sincerely, Thad D. King, President Liftside Condominium Association 498 From:Alberto Varon To:PublicInputTownCouncil Cc:Travis Coggin Subject:Say NO to Cornerstone Development Plan Date:Tuesday, November 5, 2024 5:38:24 AM Dear Mayor Coggin, and Town of Vail City Council: We write in strong opposition to the proposed development at the Cornerstone Site, at 1276 Westhaven Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision. We are owners of Unit B-11 in Lifstide Condos, where for over 25 years we have enjoyed all that Vail's nature and community has to offer. However, the current proposal has the potential to dramatically change the character of our area and town. This proposal will severely negatively affect the entire Cascade area and directly negatively impact the character and uses of Liftside Condo. I have attended the Town of Vail Planning Council meeting in June and August, as well as kept apprised of the planning developments. The plan to build a new, 2-building complex between Liftside and Chair Lift 20 would adversely impact the character and uses of Vail. Like many of our neighbors, we have focused primarily on the snow, the trees, and the sound of the creek, and have never before paid much attention to the building codes here (forgive me if I mess up a few of the terms). However, the current proposal has the potential to dramatically change the character of our area. While we are not opposed to new development writ large, this particular plan seems wildly out of line with the character and uses of the Cascade area. Historically, Cascade has not been a node onto the mountain but, if not a hidden gem, then at least a beautiful open-secret that has provided a peaceful, residential location at the foot of the mountain. It has a distinctive feel that balances the demands of tourism with the desire for serenity in the valley. Owners of Liftside, arguably the adjacent building most impacted by this plan, were not consulted about this new development. Much of the proposal depends on a 2008 SDD zoning approval that expired in 2017 and should no longer be applicable. First and foremost, the development is excessively tall, exceeding the current code limits (71') and seeking to build a 97’ building directly in front of Liftside. The Unit Numbers and overall GRFA seeks to exceed existing use (even if its not technically a deviation). From the plan, it appears that all units in Liftside Building A, including the common area in front of the pool, will be, at best, partially obscured, in shadow, and no longer have direct views of the natural environment, and other sections will also be impacted. Even a reduced height development will negatively impact our uses both through its obstruction and in access to the creek and trail. Should this move forward, the construction phase will severely disrupt life and access to all Vail residents and tourists of the Cascade areas. 499 Aside from its obvious disregard for the character of Cascade area, the Cornerstone Site Proposal appears to violate the Cascade Vail Metro District's easements and service plan. While the applicant has written that the CVMD's easement extends only to development of 12 feet, this is a spurious legal claim. The legal status of the proposed development is very much uncertain and likely be challenged in court should it proceed, which will require the Town to spend significant resources. Additionally, the development will inevitably create increased and excessive traffic and congestion, have adverse effect on snowfall at skier plaza, will certainly impact lift operations, and be detrimental to the quality of life in Cascade. It is unclear how the development will satisfy parking standards by lots under private ownership, a further deviation. The development will have detrimental environmental affects for which the developer has not offered convincing (or really any) study. We strongly urge you to vote AGAINST the request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12- 9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed-use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site. This is a bad idea for Vail. Thank you for your consideration and for all you do for Vail. Sincerely, Alberto Varon Haya Varon Jacob Varon 1234 Westhaven Drive B-11 Vail, CO 81657 500 KIM J. SETER BARBARA T. VANDER WALL COLIN B. MIELKE ELIZABETH A. DAUER RUSSELL NEWTON COURTNEY P. INTARA 7400 E. ORCHARD ROAD SUITE 3300 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 303-770-2700 FAX: 303-770-2701 www.svwpc.com e-mail: svw@svwpc.com November 4, 2024 Town of Vail Town of Vail Planning Department 75 S. Frontage Road West 75 S. Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 Vail, CO 81657 Attn: Matt Mire, Esq. at Attn: Greg Roy at mmire@vailgov.com groy@vailgov.com Davis Partnership, P.C. 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 Attn: Joe Lear at info@davispartnership.com Re: Parks Hospitality Holdings Pre-Application for Future Development of Cornerstone Parcel: Proposed Major Amendment to SDD #4 (the "Project") Agenda Item 7: Public Hearing on Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2024 To Whom it May Concern: This firm represents the Cascade Village Metropolitan District, a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the state of Colorado. We have previously provided comments to the PEC that may be found in your meeting packet as Attachments I and K oral presentations during public comment at PEC meetings that are reflected in the minutes. This correspondence does not repeat but is intended to supplement our earlier The Cascade Village Metropolitan District (the "District") was formed with Town approval of its Service Plan on January 21, 1986 (Resolution No. 5) to assist in and provide coordination and financing for some of the improvements required in SDD # 4 and ultimately to construction and provide for the operation and maintenance of Chair 20. A Public Access Easement was conveyed across the Cornerstone site granting the property right to VAI and the District jointly, to allow ingress and egress between the public roads and Vail Ski Area for: (1) pedestrian access by the public relating to ski-activities; and (2) use by VAI and the District to the extent reasonably necessary or convenient in connection with ownership and operation of the Lift (the "Public Access Easement"). A detailed discussion of the Public Access Easement is contained in our correspondence included in your packet as Attachment K. {00765726} 501 Town of Vail/Davis Partnership Re: Cascade Village MD / Future Development of Cornerstone Project November 4, 2024 Page 2 of 3 {00765726} In addition to the Public Access Easement, the District has utilized a maintenance road for nearly 30 years for skier plaza access and maintenance, construction, and operations of Lift Maintenance Road The Maintenance Road is used on a regular basis during all seasons for skier plaza and lift operations, maintenance, upgrades, and replacements.1 The Maintenance Road is clearly shown on page 34 of the Staff Presentation a copy is attached for your convenience. As shown on the attachment, the proposed project will eliminate the Maintenance Road in its entirety, leaving no alternative access to the skier plaza and lift from the Cascade Village side. Snow moving equipment, construction equipment and lift maintenance and construction vehicles and materials will have to be transported down the Gore Creek Trail, necessitating closures and creating numerous hazards. The Town Board and PEC have been advised by the town attorney that any private disputes or disagreements concerning easements should not be considered in the current process. in and elimination of these access points have a bearing on your consideration of several Criteria for Approval. Elimination of the Maintenance Road will frequently impact the use of the Gore Creek Trail as a summer recreation path and a winter skier access trail with frequent closures required to access the skier plaza, lift, and lift area. Criteria for Approval No. 2 Relationship, is implicated In addition, elimination of direct access and the need for frequent use and closure of the of Criteria for Approval 6 and 8. Alternative access roadways will eliminate existing natural features, recreation opportunities, landscaping and views. Finally, when major repairs or replacements are required, it is unlikely that there is sufficient clearance under the skier overpass to allow passage of equipment and materials. In that event, additional access areas will be required during construction and maintenance projects. In sum, regardless of any disputes concerning easements and their interpretation, the proposed Major Amendment to SDD #4 does not satisfy the Criteria for Approval and should be denied as recommended by the PEC. Thank you again for your attention and consideration of these matters. Your hard work and dedication are greatly appreciated. 1 Under Colorado Law a prescriptive easement may be created when a property owner utilizes the property of another to access his own property openly and notoriously for a period of 18 years without objection or interference. In addition to the Maintenance Road, this legal principal may apply to the ticket sales building a portion of which has existed on the Liftside property site for many years. 502 Town of Vail/Davis Partnership Re: Cascade Village MD / Future Development of Cornerstone Project November 4, 2024 Page 3 of 3 {00765726} Please contact me if you have any questions, comments, or concerns. Sincerely, SETER, VANDER WALL & MIELKE, P.C. Kim J. Seter KJS/mmb Attachment cc: Cascade Village Metro District Board of Directors 503 504 T 303-333-9810 F 303-333-9786 360 South Garfield Street Sixth Floor Denver, Colorado 80209 November 5, 2024 Sent Via Email to: publicinput.vailtowncouncil@vail.gov; sbibbens@vailgov.com Vail Town Council 75 S. Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 Re: Request to Deny Ordinance No. 15, Series 2024, an Application for a Major Amendment to SDD No. 4 Dear Mayor and Members of the Town Council Foster Graham Milstein & Calisher, LLP represents Noleggio Partners (“Noleggio”). Noleggio opposes the application submitted by PHH Design Development (“Applicant”) for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to 12-9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site, located at 1276 Westhaven Drive/Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision and setting forth details in regard thereto (“Application”). As you know, in order to approve the Application, the Application must meet each of the criteria in Section 12-9(A)-8(A) and 12-9(A)-8(B) as set forth in the Vail Town Code (“Code”). For the reasons described below, the Application does not meet the criteria in Section 12-9(A) and therefore, we respectfully request that the Vail Town Council (“Council”) deny the Application. Furthermore, Noleggio has serious concerns that ex parte communications took place before the Planning and Environmental Commission (“PEC”) hearing. Furthermore, we also have serious concerns that due process was not afforded to Noleggio and other property owners within SDD No. 4 because adequate notice, as required by federal and state law, was not provided. As a result, and as explained herein, we respectfully state that the Town Council must deny the Application, or continue the hearing to a later date, and provide adequate advanced notice to impacted neighbors. 505 I. The Application Fails to Meet the Criteria Set Forth in Section 12-9(A)-8(A) of the Code a. Compatibility Criterion 12-9A-8(A)(1) states “design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation.” This compatibility requirement must be met unless the Applicant can demonstrate that one or more of the criteria is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved.1 The Applicant is requesting an amendment to SDD No. 4 to allow for a 37% increase in height, a 36% increase in density, and a 29% increase in the GRFA in comparison to what SDD No. 4 currently allows. As explained in the Town’s staff memorandum for the August 26, 2024, PEC hearing, and by Commissioner Brad Hagedorn, the Application is not compatible with the surrounding development because of its requested height, mass, and bulk. In fact, Commissioner Brad Hagedorn asked the Applicant, “you’re viewing this as future compatibility not current compatibility?” to which the Applicant responded, “that’s probably a good way to put it.” With this statement, the Applicant admitted that there is no compatibility with surrounding development. The Applicant attempted to create compatibility by comparing the Application to hypothetical future development. In reality, the Application is not compatible with any of the surrounding development. For example, the height of the Application at its highest point is 97 feet, which is significantly higher than all surrounding buildings. The Application even deviates from the architectural design and character of the surrounding hotel, CMC building, and Liftside Condominiums which share a distinct architectural character. b. Parking. Loading, and Traffic Criterion 12-9A-8(A)(3) states a requirement for approval is, “Compliance with the parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 10 of this title.” The purpose of the parking and loading standards is to alleviate or prevent traffic congestion and shortages of parking areas by requiring on-street parking areas and off-street parking and loading facilities incidental to new structures.2 Generally, all parking and loading facilities required by the Code shall be located on the same site as the use for which they are required.3 The Town Council may permit off site or jointly used parking facilities if such offsite or shared locations are within 300 feet of the use being 1 Vail Town Code § 12-9(A)-8(A). 2 Vail Town Code § 12-10-1. 3 Vail Town Code § 12-10-6. 506 served.4 Prior to permitting off site or joint parking facilities, the Council shall determine that the proposed location of the parking facilities and the prospective operation and maintenance of the facilities will fulfill the purposes of this chapter, will be as usable and convenient as parking facilities located on the site of the use, and will not cause traffic congestion or an unsightly concentration of parked cars. The Council may require such legal instruments as it deems necessary to ensure unified operation and control of joint parking facilities or to ensure the continuation of such facilities, including evidence of ownership, long term lease or easement.5 The Application proposes that 67 parking spaces be located on site, with the additional 24 spaces for the commercial space and 6 spaces for employee housing be located in the surplus spots located in the Aria garage. However, both the Code and SDD No. 4 state that parking must be located on-site. At the PEC hearing, the Applicant argued that “on-site” meant anywhere within Area A of SDD No. 4. Legally, this does not make sense. The Code does not define “on-site” to have this counterintuitive meaning, and the Code expressly provides that Town Council approval is needed for any parking not located within the use being served, given that the off-site parking is within 300 feet of that use. Additionally, without a perpetual easement, the Applicant cannot state that a parking requirement will be satisfied on property owned by another party who may have their own parking requirements they need to meet. Additionally, the Applicant admitted that there was no alternative loading zone for service vehicles, delivery drivers, or trash pick-up. All loading for the entire building will be done from the single passenger loading zone in the front of the building which will inevitably have a negative traffic and noise impact on all surrounding buildings and is contrary to the express purpose of the parking and loading requirements of the Code.6 c. Comprehensive Plan The Town’s Comprehensive Plan is unique in that it not only contains guidelines for future development, but objective standards for that future development. The Comprehensive Plan sets forth land use categories that indicate the types of land uses that should occur within the Town. The property on which the Application is located is within the Resort Accommodations and Services (“RAS”) land use category. RAS is described as follows: “This area includes activities aimed at accommodating the overnight and short-term visitor to the area. Primary uses include hotels, lodges, service stations, and parking structures (with densities up to 25 dwelling units or 50 accommodation units per buildable acre).” The Application, as a proposal for condominium style dwelling units, proposes 43 dwelling units per acre. The Application’s proposal of 43 4 Vail Town Code § 12-10-6. 5 Vail Town Code § 12-10-6. 6 Vail Town Code § 12-10-1. 507 dwelling units per acre is in clear violation of the Comprehensive Plan’s limit of 24 dwelling units per acre, and as a result, the Town Council cannot find that all criteria required to approve the SDD amendment were satisfied.7 Therefore, the Town Council must deny the Application. II. Constitutional Due Process Concerns a. Insufficient Notice Both Article V of the United States Constitution and Article II, Section 25 of the Colorado Constitution state that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without the due process of law. As stated by the U.S. Supreme Court “For more than a century the central meaning of procedural due process has been clear: ‘Parties whose rights are to be affected are entitled to be heard; and in order that they may enjoy that right they must first be notified.’”8 In the land use context, the provisions of our constitutions are appliable because property rights are at issue. Quasi-judicial land use hearings must be conducted with a “fundamental fairness” to afford sufficient due process to interested parties.9 The essence of procedural due process is fundamental fairness. Fundamental fairness embodies adequate advance notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to state action resulting in deprivation of a significant property interest.10 The first element of fundamental fairness is ensuring adequate notice is provided so that all parties in interest know when a hearing will be held, with details as to the scope of the hearing and action to be taken at such hearing.11 Posting an agenda one business day before a Town Council meeting that includes a quasi- judicial hearing on the schedule does not constitute adequate notice. Furthermore, if notice is required for a PEC hearing, and the PEC is not the final approval body, the need for notice of a Town Council hearing where a final decision can be made is obvious. In fact, the importance of adequate advance notice is underscored by the fact that the Town Council knows adjacent property owners in Cascade Village own condominiums and are unlikely to be occupying the abutting properties at this time of year. Knowing many owners are not in Town highlights the impropriety of not providing adequate advanced notice. Therefore, because the Town did not post proper notice of this hearing as required by federal and state law, the Town Council cannot approve the Application. 7 Vail Town Code § 12-9A-8(A). 8 Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 80 (1972). 9 Monte Vista Prof. Building, Inc. v. City of Monte Vista, 531 P.2d 400, 402 (Colo. App. 1975). 10 Fuentes, 407 U.S. at 79-81. 11 U.S. Const. amend. V; Colo. Const. art. II, § 25 508 Mere compliance with the Code is not dispositive of Constitutional compliance for due process. Section 12-3-6 of the Code states that “[n]ot less than 15 days prior to the date set for the hearing before the Planning and Environmental Commission, the Administrator shall cause a copy of the notice to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the town.” This requirement is not extended to Town Council hearings. In fact, the Code does not include notice requirements for Town Council quasi-judicial hearings. Compliance with the Town’s Code does not confirm proper due process was afforded to all parties in interest. Rather, we have serious concerns that the Town Code does not include the necessary Constitutional notice provisions whatsoever. The only way the code can be read as meeting Constitutional requirements is if it includes a notice provision requiring the Town Council to provide adequate advanced notice for quasi-judicial hearings. b. Ex Parte Communications As the Town is aware, the PEC and Town Council is not permitted to speak with the applicant directly about the Project because it is considered illegal ex parte communications.12 During the PEC hearing, multiple PEC members mentioned their site visit to the Applicant’s property and direct interfacing with the Applicant on site. Please confirm that the site visit occurred before the Application was at issue with the Town, and that if the Application was at issue, that notice was posted for the site visit to ensure the integrity of the public process was not violated by acts of ex parte communications by the PEC and/or Town Council.13 III. Request Due to the Application’s deficiencies as explained herein, Noleggio respectfully requests that the Town Council deny the Application. The Application does not meet the criteria in Section 12-9A-8(A) of the Code. Additionally, the Application is clearly contrary to the objective density provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Despite the Applicant attempting to create compatibility with the surrounding development through promises of future, conceptual development, it is evident that the Application does not conform with the height, mass, bulk, and density for SDD 4. Adequate advanced notice was not afforded to neighboring property owners whose property rights can be infringed upon by the Application, which is a due process violation. Lastly, there are doubts as to whether the Application was processed in accordance with Colorado Open Meetings Law, putting the integrity of the public process at issue. 12 Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-6-401 (2024). 13 C.R.S. § 24-6-402. 509 Due to the forgoing reasons, the Application cannot be approved as a matter of law. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, David Wm. Foster FOSTER GRAHAM MILSTEIN & CALISHER, LLP 510 From: Ted Steers <Ted@vailvillagerentals.com> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2024 10:32 AM To: PublicInputTownCouncil <Publicinput.vailtowncouncil@vail.gov>; Matt Mire <jmm@hpwclaw.com>; Jonathan Spence <jspence@vailgov.com>; Greg Roy <GRoy@vail.gov> Subject: Open Space concern in Intermountain Hello all,I have written the attached letter on behalf of our neighborhood in Intermountain. I hope this matter does not become too great of a problem for any of us, including the Town of Vail. Please let me knowhow I can support any efforts to further the protection of the Open Space in Intermountain.Thank you Ted Thanks, Ted Steers Rentals in Vail - Your Mountain Vacation Awaits... (970)401-8568 (970)331-4995 www.rentalsinvail.com ted@rentalsinvail.com 2077 N. Frontage Road, W # 107 Vail, CO 81657 FORMERLY VAIL VILLAGE RENTALS ted@vailvillagerentals.com IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof. 511 Greg Roy,Town of Vail Planning,Jonathan Spence,Planning Consultant, Matt Mire Town Attorney,and Vail Town Council Sophie Silver &Ted Steers,Innsbruck Meadows Association 2782 C Kinnickinnick Rd.Vail CO aka site 10 Open Letter to all Town of Vail government members and legal department Dear Rob,Jon,and Council members, It has come to our attention that Mary Smith,aka SMB VAIL LLC,former resident and board member of Camelot Townhomes,has purchased the Open Space located at Parcel Number 21031431000,off of Basingdale Blvd. As neighbors of the open space,we strongly object to rezoning or special permitting for any development on this site.As Innsbruck Meadows Association board members,we object as individual homeowners and on behalf of the entire Innsbruck Meadows Home Owners Association. As the owners of the adjoining property,we consistently see a wide range of wildlife using this site.A well-trodden “deer path”traverses the hill below the parking deck,and every deer passing through the neighborhood eventually finds its safe passage via this pathway,stopping at the small stream to drink en route down the valley. We have lived in this property since 2012 and the wildlife traffic to our garden has only increased since we landscaped our lawn,planting shrubs and wildflowers,but purposely left the deer path in tact so these animals can pass through unharmed.The watershed under Basingdale Blvd was also a prime reason this area was initially protected. A bit of history At a time when our family was putting in a new garden and shrubbery in our backyard,we approached Merv Lapin,the owner of the open space and developer of Camalot Townhomes,to ask if he would sell us the open space so that I could clean up the garbage and possibly highlight the watershed.At the time,he said that if he sold it,he would offer it to the Camalot HOA first,and if they did not want to buy it,he would offer it to me.His team suggested that $20,000 was a fair price,and I agreed. When it came time to sell,Merv’s office contacted me,and I submitted an offer of $30,000.His office then contacted me to ask for the offer in a different format,so I submitted a new offer of $41,000.Somehow Ms. Smith was given preference and purchased it for $45,000.I would happily pay her $45,000 and continue to protect,pay taxes,and maintain the Open Space. On July 2,2022,I communicated with Mary Smith in her position as part of the Camalot HOA.“Hi Ted - FYI I met with Merv and Eric yesterday and mentioned your interest in the area to the west of your house.I think they’re interested in making something happen that may include deeding part of it to you and part to us so that our overall footprint allows replacement of the parking deck.I know that generally all the neighbors won’t be supportive of changing the open space designation for the whole plat.Let’s see what we can do.“ I don't know how Ms.Smith acted when she purchased the Open Space in her personally owned LLC’s name or if she represented the offer as part of the Camalot HOA.Regardless of the process,the Town of Vail can be assured that we,as neighbors,attempted to purchase the Open Space at the time it was offered to the neighbors,Camelot Townhouses and my wife and I,Sophie Silver and Ted Steers.We are still willing to purchase the Open Space at the price it was last sold. Thank you for considering our position on permitted uses of this Open Space. Ted Steers Ted Ste Sophie Silver SopSil 512 From:Mariana Guajardo To:PublicInputTownCouncil Subject:Cascade Cornerstone Date:Tuesday, November 5, 2024 1:32:51 PM Dear Mayor Coggin, and Town of Vail City Council: We write in strong opposition to the proposed development at the Cornerstone Site, at 1276 Westhaven Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision. We are owners of Unit B-11 in Lifstide Condos, where for over 25 years we have enjoyed all that Vail's nature and community has to offer. However, the current proposal has the potential to dramatically change the character of our area and town. This proposal will severely negatively affect the entire Cascade area and directly negatively impact the character and uses of Liftside Condo. I have attended the Town of Vail Planning Council meeting in June and August, as well as kept apprised of the planning developments. The plan to build a new, 2-building complex between Liftside and Chair Lift 20 would adversely impact the character and uses of Vail. Like many of our neighbors, we have focused primarily on the snow, the trees, and the sound of the creek, and have never before paid much attention to the building codes here (forgive me if I mess up a few of the terms). However, the current proposal has the potential to dramatically change the character of our area. While we are not opposed to new development writ large, this particular plan seems wildly out of line with the character and uses of the Cascade area. Historically, Cascade has not been a node onto the mountain but, if not a hidden gem, then at least a beautiful open- secret that has provided a peaceful, residential location at the foot of the mountain. It has a distinctive feel that balances the demands of tourism with the desire for serenity in the valley. Owners of Liftside, arguably the adjacent building most impacted by this plan, were not consulted about this new development. Much of the proposal depends on a 2008 SDD zoning approval that expired in 2017 and should no longer be applicable. First and foremost, the development is excessively tall, exceeding the current code limits (71') and seeking to build a 97’ building directly in front of Liftside. The Unit Numbers and overall GRFA seeks to exceed existing use (even if its not technically a deviation). From the plan, it appears that all units in Liftside Building A, including the common area in front of the pool, will be, at best, partially obscured, in shadow, and no longer have direct views of the natural environment, and other sections will also be impacted. Even a reduced height development will negatively impact our uses both through its obstruction and in access to the creek and trail. Should this move forward, the construction phase will severely disrupt life and access to all Vail residents and tourists of the Cascade areas. Aside from its obvious disregard for the character of Cascade area, the Cornerstone Site Proposal appears to violate the Cascade Vail Metro District's easements and service plan. While the applicant has written that the CVMD's easement extends only to development of 12 feet, this is a spurious legal claim. The legal status of the proposed development is very much uncertain and likely be challenged in court should it proceed, which will require the Town to spend significant resources. Additionally, the development will inevitably create increased and excessive traffic and congestion, have adverse effect on snowfall at skier plaza, will certainly impact lift operations, and be detrimental to the quality of life in Cascade. It is unclear how the development will satisfy parking standards by lots under private ownership, a further deviation. The development will have detrimental environmental affects for which the developer has not offered convincing (or really any) study. We strongly urge you to vote AGAINST the request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12- 9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed-use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site. This is a bad idea for Vail. 513 Thank you for your consideration and for all you do for Vail. Sincerely, Mariana Guajardo Carla Guajardo 1234 Westhaven Drive C-52 Vail, CO 81657 Enviado desde mi iPhone 514 Date: PublicInputTownCouncil Cornerstone project Tuesday, November 5, 2024 11:56:07 AM Dear Town of Vail City Council and Mayor Coggin, We write in strong opposition to the proposed development at The Cornerstone Site, at 1276 Westhaven Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision. We are owners of Unit B-41 in Lifstide Condos, where for over 25 years we have enjoyed all that Vail's nature and community has to offer. However, the current proposal has the potential to dramatically change the character of our area and town. This proposal will severely negatively affect the entire Cascade area and directly negatively impact the character and uses of Liftside Condo. I am currently on the Liftside Board of Directors and have attended all the Town of Vail Planning Council meetings regarding Cornerstone. That being said I attended The Cascade Village Metro District as well as kept apprised of the planning developments. The plan to build a new, 2-building complex between Liftside and Chair Lift 20 would adversely impact the character and uses of Vail. Like many of our neighbors, we have focused primarily on the effect this building will have on us and all the neighbors in the Glen Lyon District. The current proposal has the potential to dramatically change the character of our area. While we are not opposed to new development this particular plan seems wildly out of line with the character and uses of the Cascade area. On a couple of dates I was approached by Cornerstone’s planner Alonso Ruiz de Velasco. I put him in contact with the neighbors and we all explained the impact of this building on our property. Even though he seemed to care and heard all of our concerns he has not made a single change on the plans. A couple of things that come to mind is the blocking of our entrance to make a fancy round about that will only create traffic and disruptions to the area. No setbacks on west, east and north of their parcel, which will make their huge building even more negatively impactful on the neighbors. Having no extra parking in the building for the volume of people they intend to atract. The violations on these and other important points we have given him in person as in the different PEC meetings mention how trash pick up, Fedex and other deliveries, 911 services, and fire department are in no way resolved in this project. They are trying to insert an out of proportion building by squeezing it in a downslope area which is too small for it. As plainly stated on the las PEC meeting its like trying to fit an elephant in a tea cup. Lastly if I might make a suggestion the owner of this parcel owns the old building known before as the Aria Spa as well as the hotel and a lot of acres around. The aria building which has been abandoned has no neighbor behind and it seems more adequate to the size and shape this building is trying to accomplish. If the owner would try and build something more in character with the Glen Lyon District he would come with a comprehensive plan for all the area not only the smallest parcel. We strongly urge you to *vote AGAINST the request *for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12- 9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed-use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site. This is a bad idea for Vail. Thank you for your consideration and for all you do for Vail. Sincerely, Lorenza Chico Lorenza Chico & Carlos Cardenas 1234 Westhaven Drive B-41 Vail, CO 81657 From: To: Subject: 515 From:Jaime Kalb To:PublicInputTownCouncil Subject:Fwd: Cornerstone Building Project Date:Tuesday, November 5, 2024 4:53:10 PM Begin forwarded message: From: Jaime Kalb <kalb99@hotmail.com> Date: November 5, 2024 at 1:16:26 PM CST To: input.vailtowncouncil@vailgov.com Subject: Cornerstone Building Project  Dear Mayor Coggin, and Town of Vail City Council: We write in strong opposition to the proposed development at the Cornerstone Site, at 1276 Westhaven Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision. We are owners of Unit B-11 in Liftstide Condos, where for over 30 years we have enjoyed all that Vail's nature and community has to offer. However, the current proposal has the potential to dramatically change the character of our area and town. This proposal will severely negatively affect the entire Cascade area and directly negatively impact the character and uses of Liftside Condo. I have attended the Town of Vail Planning Council meeting in June and August, as well as kept apprised of the planning developments. The plan to build a new, 2- building complex between Liftside and Chair Lift 20 would adversely impact the character and uses of Vail. Like many of our neighbors, we have focused primarily on the snow, the trees, and the sound of the creek, and have never before paid much attention to the building codes here (forgive me if I mess up a few of the terms). However, the current proposal has the potential to dramatically change the character of our area. While we are not opposed to new development writ large, this particular plan seems wildly out of line with the character and uses of the Cascade area. Historically, Cascade has not been a node onto the mountain but, if not a hidden gem, then at least a beautiful open-secret that has provided a peaceful, residential location at the foot of the mountain. It has a distinctive feel that balances the demands of tourism with the desire for serenity in the valley. Owners of Liftside, arguably the adjacent building most impacted by this plan, were not 516 consulted about this new development. Much of the proposal depends on a 2008 SDD zoning approval that expired in 2017 and should no longer be applicable. First and foremost, the development is excessively tall, exceeding the current code limits (71') and seeking to build a 97’ building directly in front of Liftside. The Unit Numbers and overall GRFA seeks to exceed existing use (even if its not technically a deviation). From the plan, it appears that all units in Liftside Building A, including the common area in front of the pool, will be, at best, partially obscured, in shadow, and no longer have direct views of the natural environment, and other sections will also be impacted. Even a reduced height development will negatively impact our uses both through its obstruction and in access to the creek and trail. Should this move forward, the construction phase will severely disrupt life and access to all Vail residents and tourists of the Cascade areas. Aside from its obvious disregard for the character of Cascade area, the Cornerstone Site Proposal appears to violate the Cascade Vail Metro District's easements and service plan. While the applicant has written that the CVMD's easement extends only to development of 12 feet, this is a spurious legal claim. The legal status of the proposed development is very much uncertain and likely be challenged in court should it proceed, which will require the Town to spend significant resources. Additionally, the development will inevitably create increased and excessive traffic and congestion, have adverse effect on snowfall at skier plaza, will certainly impact lift operations, and be detrimental to the quality of life in Cascade. It is unclear how the development will satisfy parking standards by lots under private ownership, a further deviation. The development will have detrimental environmental affects for which the developer has not offered convincing (or really any) study. We strongly urge you to vote AGAINST the request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12- 9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed-use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site. This is a bad idea for Vail. Thank you for your consideration and for all you do for Vail. Sincerely, Jaime Kalb Ortiz Gabriela Gout 1234 Westhaven Drive, Liftside B-12 Vail, CO 81657 1234 Westhaven Drive, Liftside B-12 Vail, CO 81657 517 From:Jaime Kalb To:PublicInputTownCouncil Subject:Fwd: Cornerstone Project Date:Tuesday, November 5, 2024 4:52:36 PM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Jaime Kalb <kalbjaime@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 1:14 PM Subject: Cornerstone Project To: <input.vailtowncouncil@vailgov.com> Dear Mayor Coggin, and Town of Vail City Council: We write in strong opposition to the proposed development at the Cornerstone Site, at 1276 Westhaven Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision. We are owners of Unit B-11 in Liftstide Condos, where for over 30 years we have enjoyed all that Vail's nature and community has to offer. However, the current proposal has the potential to dramatically change the character of our area and town. This proposal will severely negatively affect the entire Cascade area and directly negatively impact the character and uses of Liftside Condo. I have attended the Town of Vail Planning Council meeting in June and August, as well as kept apprised of the planning developments. The plan to build a new, 2-building complex between Liftside and Chair Lift 20 would adversely impact the character and uses of Vail. Like many of our neighbors, we have focused primarily on the snow, the trees, and the sound of the creek, and have never before paid much attention to the building codes here (forgive me if I mess up a few of the terms). However, the current proposal has the potential to dramatically change the character of our area. While we are not opposed to new development writ large, this particular plan seems wildly out of line with the character and uses of the Cascade area. Historically, Cascade has not been a node onto the mountain but, if not a hidden gem, then at least a beautiful open-secret that has provided a peaceful, residential location at the foot of the mountain. It has a distinctive feel that balances the demands of tourism with the desire for serenity in the valley. Owners of Liftside, arguably the adjacent building most impacted by this plan, were not consulted about this new development. Much of the proposal depends on a 2008 SDD zoning approval that expired in 2017 and should no longer be applicable. First and foremost, the development is excessively tall, exceeding the current code limits (71') and seeking to build a 97’ building directly in front of 518 Liftside. The Unit Numbers and overall GRFA seeks to exceed existing use (even if its not technically a deviation). From the plan, it appears that all units in Liftside Building A, including the common area in front of the pool, will be, at best, partially obscured, in shadow, and no longer have direct views of the natural environment, and other sections will also be impacted. Even a reduced height development will negatively impact our uses both through its obstruction and in access to the creek and trail. Should this move forward, the construction phase will severely disrupt life and access to all Vail residents and tourists of the Cascade areas. Aside from its obvious disregard for the character of Cascade area, the Cornerstone Site Proposal appears to violate the Cascade Vail Metro District's easements and service plan. While the applicant has written that the CVMD's easement extends only to development of 12 feet, this is a spurious legal claim. The legal status of the proposed development is very much uncertain and likely be challenged in court should it proceed, which will require the Town to spend significant resources. Additionally, the development will inevitably create increased and excessive traffic and congestion, have adverse effect on snowfall at skier plaza, will certainly impact lift operations, and be detrimental to the quality of life in Cascade. It is unclear how the development will satisfy parking standards by lots under private ownership, a further deviation. The development will have detrimental environmental affects for which the developer has not offered convincing (or really any) study. We strongly urge you to vote AGAINST the request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12- 9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed-use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site. This is a bad idea for Vail. Thank you for your consideration and for all you do for Vail. Sincerely, Jaime Kalb Andrea Aboumrad 1234 Westhaven Drive, Liftside B-32 Vail, CO 81657 519 From:Lorenza Chico To:PublicInputTownCouncil Cc:Mama Subject:Town Council Meeting (afternoon) Date:Tuesday, November 5, 2024 11:58:19 AM Dear Mayor Coggin, and Town of Vail City Council: We write in strong opposition to the proposed development at the Cornerstone Site, at 1276 Westhaven Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision. We are owners of Unit C51 in Lifstide Condos, where for over 25 years we have enjoyed all that Vail's nature and community has to offer. However, the current proposal has the potential to dramatically change the character of our area and town. This proposal will severely negatively affect the entire Cascade area and directly negatively impact the character and uses of Liftside Condo. I have attended the Town of Vail Planning Council meeting in June and August, as well as kept apprised of the planning developments. The plan to build a new, 2-building complex between Liftside and Chair Lift 20 would adversely impact the character and uses of Vail. Like many of our neighbors, we have focused primarily on the snow, the trees, and the sound of the creek, and have never before paid much attention to the building codes here (forgive me if I mess up a few of the terms). However, the current proposal has the potential to dramatically change the character of our area. While we are not opposed to new development writ large, this particular plan seems wildly out of line with the character and uses of the Cascade area. Historically, Cascade has not been a node onto the mountain but, if not a hidden gem, then at least a beautiful open-secret that has provided a peaceful, residential location at the foot of the mountain. It has a distinctive feel that balances the demands of tourism with the desire for serenity in the valley. Owners of Liftside, arguably the adjacent building most impacted by this plan, were not consulted about this new development. Much of the proposal depends on a 2008 SDD zoning approval that expired in 2017 and should no longer be applicable. First and foremost, the development is excessively tall, exceeding the current code limits (71') and seeking to build a 97’ building directly in front of Liftside. The Unit Numbers and overall GRFA seeks to exceed existing use (even if its not technically a deviation). From the plan, it appears that all units in Liftside Building A, including the common area in front of the pool, will be, at best, partially obscured, in shadow, and no longer have direct views of the natural environment, and other sections will also be impacted. Even a reduced height development will negatively impact our uses both through its obstruction and in access to the creek and trail. Should this move forward, the construction phase will severely disrupt life and access to all Vail residents and tourists of the Cascade areas. Aside from its obvious disregard for the character of Cascade area, the Cornerstone Site Proposal appears to violate the Cascade Vail Metro District's easements and service plan. While the applicant has written that the CVMD's easement extends only to development of 12 feet, this is a 520 spurious legal claim. The legal status of the proposed development is very much uncertain and likely be challenged in court should it proceed, which will require the Town to spend significant resources. Additionally, the development will inevitably create increased and excessive traffic and congestion, have adverse effect on snowfall at skier plaza, will certainly impact lift operations, and be detrimental to the quality of life in Cascade. It is unclear how the development will satisfy parking standards by lots under private ownership, a further deviation. The development will have detrimental environmental affects for which the developer has not offered convincing (or really any) study. We strongly urge you to *vote AGAINST the request *for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12- 9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed-use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site. This is a bad idea for Vail. Thank you for your consideration and for all you do for Vail. Sincerely, Jaime and Yolanda Chico 1234 Westhaven Drive C51 Vail, CO 81657 521