HomeMy WebLinkAboutB10-0138� ,
:,
x
�
g NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
�
; .,
; �owxo�vn� •
, �.�.�
�
; Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road,Vail, Colorado 81657
� p. 970.479.2139, f.970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149
1
z ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT Permit #: B10-0138
�
� Project #: PRJ10-0182
�
,
� Job Address: 2807 ASPEN CT VAIL Status. . : ISSUED
� Location......: Applied. . : O6/17/2010
Parcel No....: 210103404010 Issued... : 08/05/2010
Expires. ..: 02/01/2011
OWNER GRASIS QUALIFIED PERSONAL RE 06/17/2010 Phone:476-1005
TRUST
� 7211 NW 83RD ST 100
� KANSAS CITY
� MO 64152
APPLICANT GRASIS,AUGUST O6/17/2010 Phone:970-476-1005
� 7211 NW 83RD ST,SUITE 100
; KANSAS CITY
� MO 64152
� License:486-L
CONTRACTOR GRASIS,AUGUST 06/17/2010 Phone:970-476-1005
� 7211 NW 83RD ST, SUITE 100
? KANSAS CITY
r€ MO 64152
B License:486-L
€
�
� Description:
� ADDITION OF RESIDENTIAL ELVATOR 8 GARAGE
f
; Occupancy: IRC Valuation: $75,000.00
! Type Construction:IRC Total Sq Ft Added: 0
j ...........................«....,,.,,,..,..,....,,.,.............,.,..,........«.. FEE SUMMARY ,,....,.,,.........,.........,..,,.,....,,...,...,.,,..........,.,,....,,...,.,
e
' Building Permit Fee-----> $818.75 Will Cal Fee-------------------> $4.00 Total Calculated Fees---------> $2,654.94
Plan Check-----------------> $532.19 Use Tax Fee------------------> $1,300.00 Additional Fees------------------> $0.00
Add'I Plan Check Hours-> $0.00 Restuarant Plan Review-----> $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES----> 5z,654.94
! Investigation---------> $0.00 Recreation Fee--------------> $0.00 �.
� Payments-------------- -----> E2,654.94
� Total Calculated Fees--------> $2,654.94 BALANCE DUE------ ---> 50.00
s
r
i ............................................................................................................,..,,.......,....,,......,...,...,.,,.........,.,..........,..,.,.,.....,.,
F
j DECLARATIONS
i I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,and state that all the information
as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws,and to build this structure
� according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes,design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town
� applicable thereto.
�
� REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM
I
i 8:00 AM-4:00 P . ,.
i
I
i Signa ure of Owner or o ractor ate
I
Print Name
;�
� bld alt construction_permit_041908
� — —
�
:3
�
�
a
s§
� Yfr1ltYVLt4Y41f�ttflft4f`4f`!ff`f`}lfeVYfY�YYY4}M'R4RAfff`f`Rf`R1ltfttRVtl�iRA'YrfitfYnYfritOYr4}##f#fR44t}Rf'HVRRftT'fYtff�kY+Yf*44f#1flfff1R41rfr4f'kYYYM1�R�kt**4�Rl1r1r4#1RRf41rfRVYey'fY(�k4t+##ff4R##+t444fdk*f11rHt�
� CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
� Permit#: 610-0138 as of 08-05-2010 Status: ISSUED
;
� ttR4RfttRNtfYffYT�RY`fktf}t4f`*Irlf'f'44NR4ZYIM'111f4rt�kR4YrR/#/�1`f'fAAA#ffrVlrfVHYf'k4tH'YYYeYtH'AM1�*#frt41r4iHrf'f�t'frfrffffrff.Yrfr'M*##�}1**f'##Af4HY1'fRR'kR'kf"R*4****f`*t#}#N1r1rfrlr*ft�fY'4LffFR'k4*fY4RfnFRfrkf`f`lrtf`
S
� Cond: 12
(BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE
COMPLIANCE.
Cond: 44
(BLDG 2009): (SFR) SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED PER SECTION
R314 OF THE 2009 IRC, IF APPLICABLE UNLESS A MONITORED FIRE
ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED.
Cond: 42
(BLDG 2009) CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS REQUIRED TO BE
INSTALLED PER 2009 IRC R315
� Cond: CON0011480
� Separate permits/shop drawings are required for the
changes/alterations to the existing fire alarm and fire
� sprinkler systems.
i
f
I
i
i
4
1
I
I
bld alt construction_permit_041908
;
i
a
�
�
s
a
i
k
� ****************************************��************%k***************�*********************
T
` TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement
� +*******++**�*�***************************r******++*+*****+**************�********+********�
± Statement Number: R100000981 Amount: $2,654 . 94 08/05/201010:23 AM
� Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: SAB
r Notation: VISA AUGUST
� GRASIS
;
� -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
k Permit No: B10-0138 Type: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT
� Parcel No: 2101-034-0401-0
:
Site Address: 2807 ASPEN CT VAIL
E Location:
Total Fees: $2,654.94
; This Payment: $2,654.94 Total ALL Pmts: $2,654.94
£ Balance: $0.00
�
� *�*******************************************�******************�**********************+�***
�
i ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Current Pmts
BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 818.75
PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 532.19
f UT 11000003106000 USE TAX 4� 1, 300.00
s WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 4.00
k
r
� -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
�
�
�
�
f
V
t
i
i
t
€
i
I
i
I
i
I
�
(
�
�
!
(
{
i
E
1
i
i
,
t
I �
06/04/2010 13:06 8167414499 AUGUST GRASIS PAGE 01
:
j'TII 1 Ar,�.71� I .
.y � -�� , ;?o����'! � 1r�a1,+�,:,,;.�,1 ,�'�' �c
�� 'F�� '� �%� � +
,��'. w 4 � + s y' �',,+�i
-�; ��� � � ' m�
1.� i:i�(+l�y�'i�� F,I i'� !` � ;;''' ,,F " •'*S '.�a�
' ��,a ,��':�'��� �, hr' "�� �. � ;.,;i;.� �4 �
e::. ,,:�i:
` .� .s . ., .� � >';�>:+,
'•l, t ` y� .
� ����t�.,� „w ?�,�k�;�' , '.:,.,,�� .�
�� '� ,ti,;�•; ., '�r ��, `' F
.y�M�'i��� . t ..
.,
,.;^:�
✓*''..
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
Separate p�nniK ero requl�ed for ebctncal,plumMng,machan�cal,flreplaae.,sfc.
!�►oJ�et�In�t Addr�s�: ol�ic�1lM: (8,
� ?1�0'1 Asr�r+ �-T P,,�,�"� � 2��'
�Mum�I) (sUrNI (su1M q DRB A; ��C�`Jt O Q � �
i�YNdbplComdNx N�1M�: � � � �ilAlnp VA►mil N �� D '�(J (�
;,,... ..._._...�.......,...�._.,, .. . . �ot r (�e�ocrc�� Subd�vie�a►. 1�� F�w 1
;CoeM�clor N�MnM n:
;�omp�ny, /1,��t�� l/�s�
:COfM�ny Ad�irqs: D�t�iNd SoeAe snd Locahon M Wbrlc. �{�D)�IDAJ
���y� saa: z�: o� A Pt.9SE�l�a EI.G�.ecfol��
Con�aaNme: l� �' � �tAW.A O►t�171T101�i _
COnLA Pho�; — � ���
1 Q�J��J' (We�dd�tland fheel Ifneonury)
E�Ylail • _ .. ......__...._.,...
WorM Cwss:
Town of WII C No.: New{ ) AdOAIa�f� Remodel O Rep�i►O OIMr( 1 �
t�.a5 r G,2A S/5 .. ..._�. ....
work Typt �,/�
+C��Iw�lw,lon�(� 1 Irmnor( 1 E%tKio►( ) 9otn(N
:.QW.N�..,..._.��......... � _... ........ . . . .....
. . . . ....... ..
��qr hra�,ao� TYP�d ouildino:
p�� Q,�01� d –O 4�1' � SlnpisFamily�Q DupbM( ) Multt-F�miy( )
rtaw��,oont,a CeuMpN�e�iOr�O�u s107b�92bA610 or Commercia�l ) otnor( 1
�.w www.u0leoounM.wh�) .. .... ........ _. ____ . _ ..,.. ..___....
TMUint N�me: Ooss s Fire Ala.rm Ex+st� Vq(� NO( )
?pwr�N�M: TLl� /',�,/li4s/S � 14L./�'f E'A _ Monitorod AIAnn9 �M(x1 N�l )
� P�Rf�NA� ,�,�`S/17En1C�.7�S�rDOes a Spr�nka�sr.osm ex�srr ree�X� No� �
.,._.._„�.._�......_..,,.�..._.....,..,_.
«a Typo ot Ex��ting F�rep�aoes: Ci�.App�ianars�,_„
!V�hratiofr llabo►8 MiEUIN�) Gaa loQ_,�„ W�oodiPeN�t_ NboO 9umlr►0____
'BuNObp: S �V F O O Q
M 6�Type o1 P►oposod Fireplaces:Gs�Appliana��d
'��. = Gaa lap� N►ood/Pe11et Q Wboa 8uminy'(]
�,,. _ � 00� �
' 0 O'v Daa Ree•iv�d: ,
�AOChNd41:(IeCM1dMp Ilisplaa�) i —
Tow: E5r �_���Dc�, �
D � � � D � C�
� �a
JUN 14 7010
TOWN OF VAIL
Asbestos Inspection and Sampling Report
2807Aspen Ct, Vail, Colorado 81657
Presented to: ��G ���?� ,
Mr. August Grasis "'""�"� ;
Homeowner � � � p � �
D
�u� � � �o�a
Performed by: TC�WN C�F VAIL
Mr. Nate Skinner
DS Consulting, Inc.
PO Box 6864
Avon, CO 81620
I
.
Prepared by.
�
Mr. Steve Shurtliff
DS Consulting, Inc.
PO Box 6864
Avon, CO 81620
(303) 378-1544
�
Project Details:
DSC Project #: 2391
Conducted: June 18, 2010
I
�
.
� Consultin
�
,
Asbestos Inspection and Sampling Report
2807Aspen Ct, Vail, Colorado 81657
Presen ted to:
Mr.August Grasis
Homeowner
Performed by:
Mr. Nate Skinner
DS Consulting, Inc.
PO Box 6864
Avon, CO 81620
Prepared by:
Mr. Steve Shurtliff
DS Consulting, Inc.
PO Box 6864
Avon, CO 81620
(303) 378-1544
Project Details:
DSC Project#: 2391
Conducted: June 18, 2010
� Consultin
g
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On June 18, 2010, Mr. Nate Skinner of DS Consulting, Inc. (DSC) performed a limited inspection and
collected asbestos bulk-samples at 2807 Aspen Ct, Vail, Colorado, in order to identify potentially
hazardous friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials (ACM) within interior and e�cterior
portions of the above-referenced,single family residence that will undergo renovations to add an elevator
to the home. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's (CDPHE) Regulation 8, Part B
defines an asbestos-containing material(ACM)as a material containing more than 1%asbestos.
Mr. Skinner collected bulk-samples of all suspected asbestos-containing materials that will be impacted by
the renovation. Bulk-samples of drywall (surfacing material) were collected in a total of three (3)
locations within the upper level bathroom and main level garage and bulk-samples of exterior stucco
(surfacing material)were collected in a total of three (3) location on the outside of the residence.
All six (6) bulk-samples were analyzed by Aerobiology Laboratory Associates, Inc. (NVLAP #200860-0) in
Denver, Colorado with all six (6) laboratory results reporting as negative for asbestos (see Appendix B for
laboratory results).
�
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On June 18, 2010, Mr. Nate Skinner of DS Consulting, Inc. (DSC) performed a limited inspection and
collected asbestos bulk-samples at 2807 Aspen Ct, Vail, Colorado, in order to identify potentially
hazardous friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials (ACM) within interior and e�rterior
portions of the above-referenced, single family residence that will undergo renovations to add an elevator
to the home. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's (CDPHE) Regulation 8, Part B
defines an asbestos-containing material(ACM)as a material containing more than 1%asbestos.
Mr. Skinner collected bulk-samples of all suspected asbestos-containing materials that will be impacted by
the renovation. Bulk-samples of drywall (surfacing material) were collected in a total of three (3)
locations within the upper level bathroom and main level garage and bulk-samples of exterior stucco
(surfacing material)were collected in a total of three (3) location on the outside of the residence.
All six (6) bulk-samples were analyzed by Aerobiolo�y Laboratory Associates, Inc. (NVLAP #200860-0) in
Denver, Colorado with all six (6) laboratory results reporting as negative for asbestos (see Appendix B for
laboratory results).
2
PROJECT OVERVIEW
I. Introduction
A limited inspection and bulk-sampling for ACM was conducted at 2807 Aspen Ct, Vail, Colorado, by Mr.
Skinner on June 18, 2010, at the request of Mr. August Grasis. Mr. Skinner is a Colorado State Certified
Building Inspector; having EPA Accreditation #16227 {see Appendix A for certificate). The purpose of tl�e
inspection was to identify, sample and assess potentially hazardous friable and non-friable ACM within
the residence.
II. Structural Design
The structure is a wood-framed,multi-level,single-family residence with attached garage.
ItI. Sampling and Analytical Procedures
The inspection, assessment and sampling were conducted by an EPA and AHERA accredited Building
Inspector qualifted by experience, education and training in the recognition of potential ACM and
a}�proved bulk-sampling techniques. The asbestos bulk-sampling was conducted on suspect ACM with a
limited number of bulk-samples being collected within the residence.
The inspection, assesstnent and sampling were performed in accordance with Environmental Protection
Agency/AHERA recommended procedures. These procedures call for the visual inspection of the area of
concern and the collection and analysis of representative bulk-samples of suspect material.
Svme minor destructive sampling was conducted. Walls, columns and perimeter pipe chases were not
broken into in order to locate and quantify suspect ACM. It should be noted that additional ACM might be
located in these and other inaccessible areas.
Random bulk-samples, representative of the suspect asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM) of
each homogeneous area (HA), were collected according to the guidelines published as Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule: Title II of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 USC, Sections
2641 through 2654 and in compliance with 40 CFR, Part 7b3. Representative sampling is based on the
following criteria:
1. The distribution of the suspect material throughout the HA.
2. The suspect material's physical characteristics and application.
3. Random sampling patterns determined for each HA.
Suspect materials sampled and analyzed should be considered to be representative of materials in each
HA if they exhibit similar physical characteristics and the application of the sampled material can be
correlated to the application of un-sampled material. Bulk-samples collected were analyzed utilizing the
EPA's MQthod for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Buildin� Materials (EPA 600/R/116, July, 1993)
and the McCrone Research Institute's The Asbestos Particle Atlas as methods references. Analysis of the
bulk-samples was performed on the "date reported,"as listed in the bulk-sample analysis report.
3
PROJECT OVERVIEW
I. Introduction
A limited inspection and bulk-sampling for ACM was conducted at Z807 Aspen Ct, Vail, Colorado, by Mr.
Skinner on June 18, 2010, at the request of Mr. August Grasis. Mr. Skinner is a Colorado State Certifted
Building Inspector; having EPA Accreditation #16227 (see Appendix A for certificate). The purpose of the
inspection was to identify, sample and assess potentially hazardous friable and non-friable ACM within
the residence.
II. Structural Design
The structure is a wood-framed,multi-level,single-family residence with attached garage.
III. Sampling and Analytical Procedures
The inspection, assessment and sampling were conducted by an EPA and AHERA accredited Building
Inspector qualified by e�cperience, education and training in the recognftion of potential ACM and
ap�roved bulk-sampling techniques. The asbestos bulk-sampling was conducted on suspect ACM with a
limited number of bulk-samples being collected within the residence.
The inspe+ction, assessment and sampling were performed in accordance with Environmental Protection
Agency/AHERA recommended procedures. These procedures call for the visual inspection of the area of
concern and the collection and analysis of representative bulk-samptes of suspect material.
Some minor destructive sampling was conducted. Walls, columns and perimeter pipe chases were not
broken into in order to locate and quantify suspect ACM. It should be noted that additional ACM might be
located in these and other inaccessible areas.
Random bulk-samples, representative of the suspect asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM) of
each homogeneous area (HA), were collected according to the guidelines published as Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule: Title II of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 USC, Sections
2641 through 2654 and in compliance with 4Q CFR, Part 763. Representative sampling is based on the
following criteria:
1. The distribution of the suspect material throughout the HA.
2. The suspect material's physical characteristics and application.
3. Random sampling patterns determined for each HA.
� Suspect materials sampled and analyzed should be considered to be representative of materials in each
HA if they exhibit similar physical characteristics and the application of the sampled material can be
correlated to the application of un-sampled material. Bulk-samples collected were analyzed utilizing the
,
EPA s Me h r h terminati n o be to i Bulk Buildin Ma rial E
PA 600 R 116 ul 199
, , 3
_ t od fo t e De o f As s s n g te s ( / / J y )
and the McCrone Research Institute's 1 as meth ds r f r
The Asbestos Particle At as o e e ences. Anal sis of the
Y
bulk-samples was performed on the "date reported,"as listed in the bulk-sample analysis report.
3
Y
IV. Notes on Report Format
Suspect materials alike in appearance and application were sampled as HAs. Suspect materials were
divided into three classifications:
1. Surfacing Material: sprayed or troweled onto structural building member.
2. Thermal System Insulation (TSI):any type of pipe,boiler,tank,or duct insulation.
3. Miscellaneous Material: other suspect materials, floor rile, sheet vinyl/linoleum, ceiling tiles,
insulation,and finishing materials.
Condition assessments were performed by the accredited inspector at the time of inspection. Condition
assessments are listed in the following section. Ratings of "good," "damaged," and "significantly
damaged"are meant to indicate the overall condition of the materiai.
A material in "good" condition has no visible damage or deterioration, or showing only very limited
damage or deterioration.
A material in "damaged" condition has the following characteristics: The surface is crumbling, blistered,
water-stained, gouged, marred or otherwise abraded over less than one-tenth of the surface if the
damage is evenly distributed (one-quarter if the damage is localized). Accumulation of powder, dust or
debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as
confirmatory evidence. A material in "significantly damaged" condition has one or more of the following
characteristics:
• The surface is crumbling or blistered over at least one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly
distributed(one-quarter if the damage is localized}.
• One-tenth (one-quarter, if localized) of the material is hanging from the surface, deteriorated, or
showing adhesive failure.
• Water stains, gouges, or mars are over at least one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly
distributed (one-quarter if the damage is localized). Accumulation of powder, dust or debris
similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as
confirmatory evidence.
Response-action recommendations for asbestos-containing HAs are listed in the section VII.
Recommendations may be for more than one HA, if tnaterials are alike. Recommendations are either
"general" or "immediate." An immediate recommendation indicates the presence of asbestos greater
than 1%within the bulk-sample, or a bulk-sample in the same HA, and should be addressed accordingly.
A general recommendation indicates asbestos does not exist greater than 1% within the bulk-sample, or
a bulk-sample in the same HA, and no further abatement activities are required for removal of the
material. Any sample reporting a "TRACE" amount of asbestos must be considered to be positive for
asbestos greater than 1%unless it is analyzed by the point-count method to be less than 1%.
a
V. Inspector Comments
No asbestos-containing material (ACM) was identified during the bulk-sampling conducted at 2807 -
Aspen Ct, Vail, Colorado. A total of six (6) bulk-samples were collected from drywall and exterior stucco
from the above-referenced residence. All six (6) bulk-samples tested negative for asbestos. =
4
�
�
IV. Notes on Report Format
Suspect materials alike in appearance and application were sampled as HAs. Suspect materials were
divided into three ciassifications:
1. Surfacing Material: sprayed or troweled onto structural building member.
2. Thermal System Insulation(TSI): any type of pipe,boiler,tank,or duct insulation.
3. Miscellaneous Material: other suspect materials, floor tile, sheet vinyl/linoleum, ceiling tiles,
insulation,and finishing materials.
Condition assessments were performed by the accredited inspector at the time of inspection. Condition
assessments are listed in the following section. Ratings of "good," "damaged," and "significantly
damaged"are meant to indicate the overali condition of the material.
A material in "good" condition has no visible damage or deterioration, or showing only very limited
damage or deterioration.
A material in "damaged" condition has the following characteristics: The surface is crumbling, blistered,
water-stained, gouged, marred or otherwise abraded over less than one-tenth of the surface if the
damage is evenly distributed (one-quarter if the damage is localized). Accumulation of powder, dust or
debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as
confirmatory evidence. A material in "significantly damaged" condition has one or more of the following
characteristics:
• The surface is crumbIing or blistered over at least one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly
distributed (one-quarter if the damage is localized).
• One-tenth (one-quarter, if localized) of the material is hanging from the surface, deteriorated, or
showing adhesive failure.
� Water stains, gouges, or mars are over at least one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly
distributed (one-quarter if the damage is localized). Accumulation of powder, dust or debris
similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as
confirmatory evidence.
Response-action recommendations for asbestos-containing HAs are listed in the section VII.
Recommendations may be for more than one HA, if materials are alike. Recommendations are either
"general" or "immediate." An immediate recommendation indicates the presence of asbestos greater
than 1% within the bulk-sample, or a bulk-sample in the same HA, and should be addressed accordingly.
A general recommendation indicates asbestos does not exist greater than 1% within the bulk-sample, or
' a bulk-sample in the same HA, and no further abatement activities are re uired for removal of the
9
material. Any sample reporting a "TRACE" amount of asbestos must be considered to be positive for
asbestos greater than 1% unless it is analyzed by the point-count method to be less than 1%.
V. Inspector Comments
No asbestos-containing material (ACM) was identified during the bulk-sampling conducted at 2807
Aspen Ct, Vail, Colorado. A total of six (6) bulk-samples were collected from drywall and exterior stucco
from the above-referenced residence. All six (6) bulk-samples tested negative for asbestos.
4
l
VI. Homogeneous Area Descriptions
The following section contains sampled HA descriptions and sample locations. Percent-asbestos content
for each sample indicated can vary depending on sample locations, homogeneity of the materials, and
type of application. The following samples were collected from the single family residence at 2807 Aspen
Ct, Vail, Colorado, on June 18, 2010. The quantities are approximations and are subject to field
verification:
� � . . � . . � � � � • 1
Sample#: DWl-1 Sample#: DW1-2
Sample Descri�tion: Drywall Sample Description: Drywall
Sample Location: Upper Level Bathroom Wall Sample Location: Garage Wall
Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Classification: Surfacing Material
Material Quantity: +/-200ft2 Material Quantity: +�- 200ftz
Material Condition: Good Material Condition: Good
Physical Description (layers): White compound physical Description (layers): White tape; White
w/white paint;White/tan drywall joint compound;White texture w/white paint;
White tan d all
Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative; Negative Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative; Negative;
Ne ative; Ne ative
Recommendations: GENERAL-See Section VII Recommendations: ��IERAL-See Section VII
. � � . � .
Sample#: DW1-3 Sample#: ST1-1
Sample Description: Drywall Sample Description: Exterior Stucco
Sample Location: Garage Wall Sample Location: Exterior Wall
Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Classification: Surfacing Material
Material Quantity: +�- 200ft2 Material Quantity: +�- 300ft2
Material Condition: Good Materiat Condition: Good
Physical Description (layers): White tape; physical Description (layers): Gray plaster;White
White/tan drywall;White joint compound; White granuiar compound;White texture w/white paint
texture w white aint
Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative; Negative; Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative; Negative;
Ne ative; Ne ative Ne ative
Recommendations: GENERAL-See Section VII Recommendations: GENERA,�-See Section VII
5
�
�
VI. Homogeneous Area Descriptions
The following section contains sampled HA descriptions and sample locations. Percent-asbestos content
for each sample indicated can vary depending on sample locations, homogeneity of the materials, and
type of application. The following samples were collected from the single family residence at 2807 Aspen
Ct, Vail, Colorado, on June 18, 2010. The quantities are approximations and are subject to field
verification:
. � . . � � . . . � . . �
Sample#: DW1-1 Sample#: DW1-2
Sample Description: Drywail Sample Description: Drywall
Sample Location: Upper Level Bathroom Wall Sample Location: Garage Wall
Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Classification; Surfacing Material
Material Quantity: +/- 200ftz Material Quantity: +/- ZOOft2
Material Condition: Good Material Condition: Good
Physical Description (layers): White compound Physical Description (layers): White tape;White
w/white paint;White/tan drywall joint compound;White texture w/white paint;
White tan d all
Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative; Negative Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative; Negative;
Ne ative; Ne ative
Recommendations: GENERA�-See Section VII Recommendations: GENERA�-See Section VII
� . . � � . . � . . . �
Sample#: DW1-3 Sample#: ST1-1
Sample Description: Drywall Sample Description: Exterior Stucco
Sample Location: Garage Wall Sample Location: Exterior Wall
Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Classifrcation: Surfacing Material
Material Quantity: +/- 200ftz Material Quantity: +/- 300ft2
Material Condition: Good Material Condition: Good
Physical Description (layers): White tape; physical Description (layers): Gray plaster;White
White/tan drywall;White joint compound;White granular compound;White texture w/white paint
texture w white aint
Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative; Negative; Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative; Negative;
Ne ative; Ne ative Ne ative
Recommendations: GENERAL-See Section VII Recommendations: GENERAL-See Section VII
5
, � � , � � �
Sample#: ST1-2 Sample#: ST1-3
Sample Description: Exterior Stucco Sample Description: Exterior Stucco
Sample Location: Exterior Wall Sample Location: Exterior Wall
Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Classification: Surfacing Material
Material Quantity: +/- 300ft2 Material Quantity: +/- 300ft2
Material Condition: Good Material Condition: Good
Physical Description (layers): Gray plaster;Yellow Physical Description ((ayers): Gray plaster;White
fibrous woven;White granular texture w/white compound;Yellow fibrous woven;White granular
aint texture w white aint
Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative; Negative; Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative; Negative;
Ne ative Ne ative; Ne ative
Recommendations: GENERAL-See Section VII Recommendations: GENERAL-See Section VII
VII. Recommendations
GENERAL:
The laboratory results of the potential ACM sampled at 2807 Aspen Ct,Vail, Colorado, indicate that all six
(6) bulk-samples of drywall and exterior stucco collected were reported as negative for asbestos.
Therefore, no professional abatement activities are recommended to remove the above-referenced
material.
6
1 � � • • '
Sample#: ST1-2 Sample#: ST1-3
Sample Description: Exterior Stucco Sample Description: Exterior Stucco
Sample Location: Exterior Wall Sample Location: Exterior Wall
Material Classiftcation: Surfacing Materiai Material Classification: Surfacing Material
Material Quantity: +/-300ftz Material Quantity: +/- 300ft2
Material Condition: Good Material Condition: Good
Physical Description (layers): Gray plaster;Yellow Physical Description (layers): Gray plaster;White
fibrous woven;White granular texture w/white compound;Yellow fibrous woven;White granular
aint texture w white aint
Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative; Negative; Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative; Negative;
Ne ative Ne ative; Ne ative
Recommendations: , .N BL-See Section VII Recommendations: �"See Section VII
VII. Recommendadons
GENERAL:
The laboratory results of the potential ACM sampled at Z807 Aspen Ct,Vail, Colorado,indicate that all six
(6) bulk-samples of drywall and exterior stucco collected were reported as negative for asbestos.
Therefore, no professional abatement activities are recommended to remove the above-referenced
material.
6
I
APPENDIX A
CERTIFICATION
s��� aF ca�€��c�
��������
�.���
.� ,� ..�
�������� ,��,� ��.:
� �� �
�n '� � .
�� � ����5� �� ~��h �
.� �; � � ,
� � � ����
.. F ����.[,�3 . � .
� � ��� �� . ,k,s�.� 2. . � .
'� �-, �' �:�i�� a e '� �
� jti s t , -.'
q `� t""�°� � r�.� : '".c�" t '' � ��
� � t .�,. Z�.'�'�V'f,p\.r. � µY4. +w ...
,� '.;. .r ' . ����'
�CA,�A.in�� �-'
.�� �� �,r -°� �,�
� �� Or*� ��
�� � �,;.:
I�wetle t16I201a�,� ' � �^"�
-�'�^�»�,..,..� ,...-.;.
Bsphutept 1l6F20t1 "".
�+
' �nwarMRM.A..r�MB!wwa.p.i..ir.�.y.�w+.vw�ayjp..w�IN+i�i�«ww
n�IjAa�YwA►/ir�KryM���N��MK � � �
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
7
APPENDIX A
CERTIFICATION
� � ST��'E:OF CULt);T�A�tJ
� �� ,,;,
_ � �� ���
�,�� �� ��+ � -� ;
� �"`..� ¢ i
� � ��� °*r '" ��` �.
'��� .�a. F�.�. ��° >� ��a� .
� , ». ,, �
� , ''�. � . ,�. �� . ,
����',,�,.dl,,y; ��� ��� � 5'3� � �� 1
/ /► �} yj �;
'so,�g� �
� �' Z.�"�7��4. ��11�� .
;� �'' ��'�
� T �.W,#� � ���
�. ���:,{��� �, , �;
'� � �._ O�� �� ;
Tr�ed:21f1�10 ' ��
�,,
�tpirrr�e�:?!Gf1011y���"4"~`��
fewwwan.�
. •nrrwytrw�a..bwiywl�Mr.�ryinwnutMMMw{�wMtr.riyM�fs ,�:
iwlpk�i�lle�e�li►�w$fMYrw� � . . - �..
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
7
�AERObIOLOC��/ LAbORATOR)/
-�-� ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
`` CONSULTING LABORATORY
Certificate of Analysis
13949 W.Colfax Ave
Suite 205
Lakewood,CO 80401
303.2323746
www.aerobiobw.net
Client Name DS Consulting,Inc. ������ Date Collected: 06/18/10
Street address 5366 Flatrock Ct. � Date Received: 06/18/10
City,State ZIP Monison,CO 80465 Date Analyzed: 06/18/10
Attn: Nate Skinner #200860-o Date Reported: 06/18/10
Client Project Name: 2807 Aspen Ct. Project ID: 104153
Job ID:
Test Requested: 3002,Asbestos in Bulk Samples
Method: Polarized Light Microscopy/Dispersion Staining(PLM),Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.EPA-600/R-93/116,July 1993.
Homo- Num er Asbestos Detected Non-As estos Non-Fibrous Matrix
Sam le Identification Physical Description of Sample; geneous of Fibers Mat ri Material
Client La Sam le Number Additional Comments es/no La ers°/a area°/a area% com osition
104153-1A White Compound w/White Paint N 2,15% Negative 100
DW1-1
15%
104153-1B White/Tan Drywall N 2,85% Negative CELL 85 G
98%
104153-2A White Tape N 4,5% Negative CELL 2
104153-2B White Joint Compound N 4,5% Negative 100 C
DW1-2
104153-2C White Texture w/White Paint N 5,10% Negative 100 C
15%
104153-2D White/Tan Drywall N 4,80% Negative CELL 85 G
98%
104153-3A White Tape N 4,5% Negative CELL 2
15%
104153-3B White/TanDrywall N 4,15% Negative CELL 85 G
DW1-3
104153-3C White Joint Compound N 4,30% Negative 100 C
104153-3D White Texture w/White Paint N 4,50% Negative 100 C
�����--
Paul Knappe
Laboratory Analyst
ri��G� �_•-----------_.
/
am ump eys
Asbestos Laboratory Supervisor
A=Amosite
AC=Actinolite
AN=Anthophyllite
CHRY=Chrysotile
CR=Crocidolite
TR=Tremolite
Trace=Less Than 1%
Page 1 of 3 13949 W.Colfax Ave.Suite 205,Lakewood CO 80401,303.232.3746
CELL=Cellulose
MW=Mineral Wool
FBG=Fiberglass
SYN=Synthetic
WO=Wollastonite
NTR=Non-Asbestiform TR
NAC=Non-Asbestiform AC
FT=Fibrous Talc
AH=Animal Hair
Q=Quartz
C=Cazbonates
V=Vermiculite
G=Gypsum
M=Mica
T=Taz
P=Perlite
O=Organic
B=Binder
OP=Opaques
D=Diatoms
�AERObIO�OC�y IAI�ORATORy
�ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
CONSUITING LABORATORY
Certificate of Analysis
13949 W.Colfax Ave
Suite 205
Lakewood,CO 80401
303.232.3746
www.aerobioloav.net
Client Name DS Consulting,Inc. ������ Date Collected: 06/18/10
Street address 5366 Flatrock Ct. fl Date Received: 06/18/10
City,State ZIP Morrison,CO 80465 Date Analyzed: 06/18/10
Attn: Nate Skinner #200860-o Date Reported: 06/18/10
Client Project Name: 2807 Aspen Ct. Project ID: 104153
Job ID:
Test Requested: 3002,Asbestos io Bulk Samples
Method: Polazized Light Microscopy/Dispersion Staining(PLM),Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.EPA-600/R-93/116,July 1993.
Homo- Num er Asbestos Detected Non-As estos Non-Fibrous Matrix
Sam le Identification Physical Description of Sample; geneous of Fi ers Material M erial
Client Lab Sam le Number Additional Comments es/no La ers% azea°/a area% com osition
104153-1A White Compound w/White Paint N 2,15% Negative 100
DW1-1
15%
104153-1B White/Tan Drywall N 2,85°/a Negative CELL 85 G
98%
104153-2A White Tape N 4,5% Negative CELL 2
104153-2B White Joint Compound N 4,5% Negative 100 C
DW1-2
104153-2C White Texture w/White Paint N 5,10% Negative 100 C
15%
104153-2D White/Tan Drywall N 4,80% Negative CELL 85 G
98%
104153-3A White Tape N 4,5% Negative CELL 2
15%
104153-3B White/Tan Drywall N 4,15% Negative CELL 85 G
DW1-3
104153-3C White Joint Compound N 4,30°/a Negative 100 C
104153-3D White Texture w/White Paint N 4,50% Negative 100 C
/�`�����
Paul Knappe
Laboratory Analyst
��� -----
ump eys
Asbestos Laboratory Supervisor
A=Amosite
AC=Actinolite
AN=Anthophyllite
CHRY=Chrysotile
CR=Crocidolite
TR=Tremolite
Trace=Less Than 1%
Page 1 of 3 13949 W.Colfax Ave.Suite 205,Lakewood CO 80401,303.232.3746
CELL=Cellulose
MW=Mineral Woo►
FBG=Fiberglass
SYN=S}mthetic
WO=Wollastonite
NTR=Non-Asbestiform TR
NAC=Non-Asbestifortn AC
FT=Fibrous Talc
AH=AnimaJ Hair
Q=Quartz
C=Cazbonates
V=Vermiculite
G=Gypsum
M=Mica
T=Taz
P=Perlite
O=Organic
B=Binder
OP=Opaques
D=Diatoms
�AERObioloc�y Laboru�TORy
--`� ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
`` CONSULTING LABORATORY
Certificate of Analysis
13949 W.Colfax Ave
Suite 205
Lakewood,CO 80401
303.2323746
www.aerobiobav.net
Client Name DS Consulting Inc. ������ Date Collected: 06/18/10
Street address 5366 Flatrock Ct. � Date Received: 06/18/10
City,State ZIP Morrison,CO 80465 Date Analyzed: 06/18/10
Attn: Nate Skinner #200860-0 Date Reported: 06/18/]0
Client Project Naroe: 2807 Aspen Ct. Project ID: 104153
Job ID:
Test Requested: 3002,Asbestos in Bulk Samples
Method: Polazized Light Microscopy/Dispersion Staining(PLM),Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.EPA-600/R-93/I 16,July 1993.
Homo- Number Asbestos Detected Non-As estos Non-Fibrous Matrix
Sam le Identification Physical Description of Sample; geneous of Fi er Materi Material
Client Lab Sam le Number Additional Comments es/no La ers% area% azea% com osition
104153-4A Gray Plaster N 3,1% Negative 100 C
ST1-1 104153-4B White Granulaz Compound N 3,30°/a Negative 100 C
104153-4C White Texture w/White Paint N 3,69% Negative 100 B
104153-SA Gray Plaster N 3,10% Negative 100
98°/a
ST1-2 104153-SB YellowFibrous Woven N 3,10% Negative FBG 2
104153-SC White Granular Texture w/White Paint N 3,80% Negative 100
104153-6A Gray Plaster N 4,5% Negative 100 C
104153-6B White Compound N 4,5% Negative 100 C
ST 1-3
98%
104153-6C Yellow Fibrous Woven N 4,5% Negative FBG 2
104153-6D White Granulaz Texture w!White Paint N 4,85% Negative 100 C
//
�, ��,�/i ���%'
� e c a ce e
Laboratory Analyst
�� ____
ump eys
Asbestos Laboratory Supervisor
A=Amosite
AC=Actinolite
AN=Anthophyllite
CHRY=Chrysotile
CR=Crocidolite
TR=Tremolite
Trace=Less Than 1%
Page 2 of 3 13949 W.Colfax Ave.Suite 205,Lakewood CO 80401,303.232.3746
CELL=Cellulose
MW=Mineral Wool
FBG=Fiberglass
SI'N=Synthetic
WO=Wollastonite
NTR=Non-Asbestiform TR
NAC=Non-Asbestiform AC
FT=Fibrous Talc
AH=Animal Hair
Q=Quartz
C=Cazbonates
V=Vermiculi[e
G=Gypsum
M=Mica
T=Taz
P=Perlite
O=Organic
B=Binder
OP=Opaques
D=Diatoms
`AERObiO�OC�y LAI�ORATORy
�ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
CONSULTING LABORATORY
Certificate of Analysis
13949 W.Colfax Ave
Suite 205
�ewooa,co soao�
303.232.3746
www.aerobiobuv.net
Client Name DS Consulting,Inc. ������ Date Collected: 06/18/10
Street address 5366 Flatrock Ct. fl Date Received: 06/18/10
City,State ZIP Monison,CO 80465 Date Analyzed: 06/18/10
Attn: Nate Skinner #200860-0 Date Reported: 06/18/]0
Client Project Name: 2807 Aspen Ct. Project ID: 104153
Job ID:
Test Requested: 3002,Asbestos in Buik Samples
Method: Polazized Light Microscopy/Dispersion Staining(PLM),Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.EPA-600/R-93/116,July 1993.
Homo- Number Asbestos Detected Non-As estos Non-Fibrous Matrix
Sam le Identification Physical Description of Sample; geneous of Fi r Ma eri Ma erial
Client Lab Sam le Number Additional Comments es/no La ers% azea°/a azea% com osition
104153-4A Gray Plaster N 3,1% Negative 100 C
ST1-1 104153-4B White Granular Compound N 3,30% Negative 100 C
104153-4C White Texture w/White Paint N 3,69% Negative 100 B
104153-SA Gray Plaster N 3,10% Negative 100
98%
STl-2 104153-SB YellowFibrous Woven N 3,10% Negative FBG 2
104153-SC White Granular Texture w/White Paint N 3,80% Negative 100
104153-6A Gray Plaster N 4,5% Negative 100 C
104153-6B White Compound N 4,5% Negative 100 C
ST1-3
98%
104153-6C Yellow Fibrous Woven N 4,5% Negative FBG 2
104153-6D White Granulaz Texture w/White Paint N 4,85% Negative 100 C
�'�t%/�� �j�/���
�- t /
ie ca oe e
Laboratory Analyst
��� -----
ump eys
Asbestos Laboratory Supervisor
A=Amosite
AC=Actinolite
AN=Anthophyllite
CHRY=Chrysotile
CR=Crocidolite
TR=Tremolite
Trace=Less Than 1%
Page 2 of 3 13949 W.Colfax Ave.Suite 205,Lakewood CO 80401,303.2323746
CELL=Cellulose
MW=Mineral Wool
FBG=Fiberglass
SYN=Synthetic
WO=Wollastonite
NTR=Non-Asbestiform TR
NAC=Non-Asbestiform AC
FT=Fibrous Talc
AH=Animal Hair
Q=Quartz
C=Cazbonates
V=Vermiculite
G=Gypsum
M=Mica
T=Tar
P=Perlite
O=Organic
B=Binder
OP=Opaques
D=Diatoms
�AEROE310LOC.�y LAbORATORy
-�1 ASSOCIATES,INCORPORATED
`` CANSULTING IABORATORY Certificate of Analysis
13949 W.Colfa�c Ave
Swte 205
t�eWOOa,co soao i
303.232.3746
www.aerobioloav.net
DS Consulting,Inc. � Date Collected: 06/18/10
5366 Flatrock Ct. ��a�p� Date Received: 06/IS/10
Morrison,CO 80465 Date Malyzed: 06/18/10
Nate Skinner #200860-o Date Reported: 06/18/10
Client Project Name: 2807 Aspen Ct. Project ID: 104153
Job ID:
Generai Notes
♦ Negative indicates no asbestos was detected;the method detection limit is 1%.
♦ Trace or"<I"indicates asbestos was identified in the sample,but the concentration is less than the method detection limit of 1%.
♦ All regulated asbestos minerals(i.e.chrysotile,amosite,crocidolite,anthophyllite,tremolite,and actinolite)were sought in every layer of each sample,but only those asbestos
minerals detected are listed.Amosite is the common name for the asbestiform variety of the minerals cummingtonite and grunterite. Crocidolite is the common name used for the
asbestiform variety of the mineral reibekite.
♦ Tile,vinyl,foam,plastic,and fine powder samples may contain asbestos fibers of such smalf diameter(<025 microns in diameter)that these fibers cannot be detected by PLM.
For such samples,more sensitive analytical methods(e.g.TEM,SEM,and XRD)aze recommended if greater certainty about asbestos content is required. Semi-quantitative bulk 1'EM
floor tile analysis is accepted under the NESHAPS regulations.
♦ These results are submitted pursuant to Aerobiology Laboratory Associates,Inc.'s current terms and conditions of sale,including the company's standard warranty and limitation
of liability provisions. No responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted.
♦ Unless notified in writing to retum the samples covered by this report,Aerobiology Laboratory Associates,Inc.will store the samples for a minimum period oFthirty(30)days
before discarding. A shipping and handling chazge will be assessed for the retum of any samples.
Notes Reauired bv NVLAP
♦ This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification,approval,or endorsement by NVLAP,NIST,or any agency of the Federal Govemment.
♦ This test report relates only to the items tested or calibrated.
♦ This report is not valid unless it bears the name of a NVLAP-approved signatory.
♦ Any reproduction of this document must include the entire document in order for the report to be valid.
13949 W.Colfax Ave.Suite 205,Lakewood CO 80401,303.232.3746
�AERObIO�OC,�Y LAbORATORy
�ASSOCIATES,INCORPORATED
CANSULTING LABORATORY Certificate of Analysis
13949 W,Colfax Ave
Suitc 205
�eWOOa,co soao�
303.232.3746
www.aerobioloav.net
DS Consulting,Inc. ��^� � Date Collected: 06/18/10
5366 Flatrock Ct. i�p� Date Received: 06/IS/10
Morrison,CO 80465 Date Malyzed: 06/18/10
Nate Skinner #200860-0 Date Reported: 06/18/10
Client Project Name: 2807 Aspen Ct. Project ID: 104153
Job ID:
General Notes
♦ Negative indicates no asbestos was detected;the method detection limit is 1%.
♦ Trace or"<1"indicates asbestos was identified in the sample,but the concentration is less than the method detection limit o£1%.
♦ All regulated asbestos minerals(i.e.chrysotile,amosite,crocidolite,anthophyllite,tremolite,and actinolite)were sought in every layer of each sample,but only those asbestos
minerals detected are listed.Amosite is the common name for the asbestiform variety of the minerals cummingtonite and grunterite. Crocidolite is the common name used for the
asbestiform variety of the mineral reibekite.
♦ Tile,vinyl,foam,plastic,and fine powder samples may contain asbestos fibets of such small diameter(<0.25 microns in diameter)that these fibers carmot be detected by PLM.
For such samples,more sensitive analytical methods(e.g.TEM,SEM,and XRD)are recommended if greater certainty about asbestos content is required. Semi-quantitative bulk TEM
floor tile analysis is accepted under the NESHAPS regulations.
♦ These results are submitted pursuant to Aerobiology Laboratory Associates,Inc.'s current terms and conditions of sale,including the company's standazd warranty and limitation
of liability provisions. No responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted.
♦ Unless notified in writing to retum the samples covered by this report,Aerobiology Laboratory Associates,Inc.will store the samples for a minimum period of thirly(30)days
before discarding. A shipping and handling charge will be assessed for the retum of any samples.
Notes Reauired bv NVLAP
♦ 1'his report must not be used by the client to claim product certification,approval,or endorsement by NVLAP,NIST,or any agency of the Federal Govemment.
♦ This test report relates only to the items tested or calibrated.
♦ This report is not valid unless it bears the name of a NVLAP-approved signatory.
♦ Any reproduction of this document must include the entire document in order for the report to be valid.
13949 W.Colfax Ave.Suite 205,Lakewood CO 80401,303.232.3746
Kevin Bossow
From: Steve Shurtliff[steve@dsconsultinginc.comj
3ent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 10:27 AM
To: kpbossow�yahoo.com
SubjeCt: Asbestos Report
Attachments: image001.jpg; 2391 -HO August Grasis-2807 Aspen Court, Vail, CO 6-18-10[Ai].pdf
Kevin,
Attached is the asbestos report for the residence at 2807 Aspen Ct in Vail. Al)samples were negative for asbestos. This
report should be all that is needed from the buitding department to issue permits. If you have any questions or if you
need anything else, please call me. Thank you again, have a good weekend.
Take care,
Steve Shurtliff
Project Manager
DS Consulting, Inc.
(303)378-1544
www.dsconsultinrtinc.com
steve@dsconsultin�inc.com
,
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG-www.avg.com
Versfon: 8.5.437/Virus Database: 271.1.1/2946-Release Date: 06/18/10 06:35:00
�
�
1
Kevin Bossow
From: Steve Shurtliff(steve@dsconsultinginc.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 10:27 AM
To: kpbossow@yahpo.com
Subject: Asbestos Repart
Attachments: image001.jpg; 2391 -HO August G�asis-2807 Aspen Court,Vail, CO 6-98-10[Ai].pdf
Kevin,
Attached is the asbestos report for the residence at 2807 Aspen Ct in Vail. All samples were negative for asbestos. this
report should be all that is needed from tMe building department to issue permits. If you have any questions or if you
need anything else, please call me. Thank you again, have a good weekend.
Take care,
Steve Shurtliff
Project Manager
DS Consulting, Inc.
(303)378-1544
www.dsconsultin�inc.com
steve@dsconsultinQinc.com
,
Na virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG-www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.437/Virus Database: 271.1.1/2946-Release Date: 06/18/10 06:35:00
�
y 9
•.+ .
� ��� ""/'°��Vl..i
08-12-2010 Inspection Request Re orting cJ Page 26
8:13 am Vail, C�-CitTp�
Requested Inspect Date: Thursday Augu� st 12, 2010
Assigned To: JMONDRbGON
Inspection Type: BLDG
Inspection Area: CG
Site Address: 2807 ASPEN CT VAIL
A/P/D Information
Activity: 610-0138 Type: A-BUILD Sub Type: ASFR Status: ISSUED
Const Type: Occup ancy: Use: IRC Insp Area: CG
Owner: GRASIS QUALIFIED PER50NKL RESIDENCE- Phone: 476-1005
Contractor: GRASIS,AUGUST Phone: 970-476-1005
Description: ADDITION OF RESIDENTIAL ELVATOR&GARAGE
Requested Inspection(s)
Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING Requested Time: 11:75 AM
Requestor: GRASIS,AUGUST Phone: 970-476-1005
C o m m e n t s: 719-3 3 8-06 81
Assigned To: JMONDRAGON Entered By: JMONDRAGON K
Action: Time Exp:
���
Inspection Historv
Item: 501 PW-Access/Staging/Erosion
Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING
Item: 504 PW-Retainin Wall Layout
Item: 502 PW-Rough �riveway Grade
Item: 20 BLDG-Foundation/Steel
Item: 21 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan
Item: 410 Special Inspect-p rogress rept
Item: 22 PLAN-ILC FRAMfNG
Item: 30 BLDG-Framing
Item: 50 BLDG-Insulation
Item: 60 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail
Item: 70 BLDG-Misc.
Item: 535 DIA-30 DAY REMINDER
Item: 536 DIA-SITE/LANDSCAPING
Item: 533 PLAN-TEMP. C/O
Item: 420 Spe�cial Ins�pect-final rept
Item: 503 PW-Final Driveway Grade
Item: 542 PLAN-FINAL
Item: 90 BLDG-Final
REPT131 Run Id: 11822
Rug i2 10 08:23a S�IL TES7I�� ENG %1�59���07 p. e
` , .,.+
SO1L T�.�TI�1G �. EN�I�`�lEE�4R��.� IN�:..
,�����t ��, za�o
Ar�gu�t Gras�s
2�Q?Aspen Ct
Vail CU
RE: 2807 Aspen t;t
57E JGB: 100�31'1
G�nfierner:
F'�rsnnne!of Soil Te�ting and �nglneeri�~�� 1nc. (STE� per`orm�r an c���s�rv�tion of the open
excavati�n a't the above-ref�er�r7ced s�+e cn Au�ust '11, 2!?�0.
The infortriation anti recoe�merdations containPd in thi� letter ar� intenc'ed for us� by
individuals^�vf�a are`amil�ar with the cor,structi�n practi�es and standarcis cr,;�;irrran t�r th:s�ec,�icn
and ail appl;�a�le building c;od��. VIlarrarity c�rnpanies n°a}�re�uire�rsore�tr[nger�t
r�ccc�mmendations than those provided in?his rep�rt(i.e., final grade slc7pes). V1Ih�n di�erences
�xist E�etw�en underivriting reyuirements, th�go���a�ming c�de, and/or��comm�ndatior!s
contairerJ in this 'etter, the more stringen�shaf;c��ntrai.
Th� recammer�datisarss can±ain�a in this !ett�r�re basec�upon s.he conr�it�ons ohs�rved on
fi�sc�ust 1�, 2010. Rry changes in con�litians, including kaut not lirnited to excavati�n lacati�sn.
@f@Vr�tE0E1S, or ehang�s resulting from ad�lerse+�r��ther conditiaris, shot�[�� be braught te�th�;
attention of aoi!Testing and E��gineering Ir�c.
� ---
___._ _��_______._��_—____ _..--�_._�._ ----___._ -----,
�__ SOJL PARA;VfET��tS �ND GOND1710N5
------- --._.��___d__�____.____.� __---� __. .._�_—___�_._f
St311.TY"PE{5�: Suil types obs�rvec! in ih�faund�ti�n�xeava�i�r��,�ere fc�und
ta�ansist of si!1y to vlayey �anc4 F�!I oU�er silty wel!r���ted
cob�ies graueis 5and.
aAL.L(J'll�+A�LE BEARII�G
C�iPa,GiTY: ,�,r �ao�tirable �e�arir�� cap�city rf 26(30 �sf�s recomm�n��d
wi#h an eq�livalen± i�ydros:atic ffuid �ressure in thc acliv�
stat�. aff 38�:c�. 1'he eq�,oi�-ale��t hyr�ros4atil.fluid pressur�
assurryes level 3aack`i1l ccandit;ons �n� may r�puir�
mod's#icatinn for 4h� �{fects cf surch�rgP laac4s, slo�ing
baekfill. etc.
��F�ANSlON �Q7ENTIAL: lfery loev in tt�e naiive �oils
M01STllR.E C:qNl"EI�T: LUVr to high
T 22�.3 WAYNUKA ROhD,S i�.d: • C(�Lt7RAD0 SPRI{�CU 8�15 ! (7l�?}59 t-05105 • F,�X(i'1��59�-+A6Q7 �
Cupyrighat 2C1�7-Soi��i"estir��g and Cr�g�ne��ing, ;nc.
flu� ?2 �C 0�: �3a S�iL. TE"STI�G E.MG 7195�1��n7 �. 3
280;,asper��'t S7E Job 1 Ct�8i 1
Page 2 0£�!12110
SOIL F'ARf11lrIETERS pPdU Ct'�NDITION�
�C?N7"'�
FILL: �ill was preser�t adjacerzt to the existing foundati�n and
cansistv of hic�h moisiure cantent s�1ty io slightly clayey sand
�H th cobh�lc.s. Th�: r?a�ority��1he fili v�as per;etrai�� by the
�xcauvaticn. H���nrev�r, up tr� 00 �nehes e�f sofl matsriri 's
I�c�.ted o��er tl7e �ati+��ccab�;les_ Subsequent to setting fa�tinr
?nrrns the =aft m�terial is tc be rem�veci ��efi��een the f�rms
SPEC�AL
GOf�S1L7ERATIOiVS: r�s ciiscussed ��bcve, p�cket� of;sr�ft so�l are pres�nt aver t:he
c��bl�s. 1 ne so`f mafiri�i is tc� be rerr°,ovp� t� �he cobbies
be'weert the forms. T"e bctt�m of fhe faoti�sg�vili no't h�e f�v�l.
It shauid nat affect th� performance �f tM� prcposE,d
t�undation.
The recr,msnenc9atians cont�ir.e�!�n 2hrs I�tter ar� pr���ir��for
�r9 addition tt�an�xistir�c suuc'LSre. �fhey are �r�`��r��!�d tc�
sadisfy, inasrrGCh as practical, �n-s'�te soil cc�r�ditiuns an�
�rovide � �yst�rn ?l��:is c:ompatible��nrith thie�xi�tsr;g syste:�-,.
The �:�xi5tinq sGrface drai� Ur�� c!aTager,i ����rin� �he
�xc�v�iio^ pro�,ess. l"he cirain r�ip' apPe�rr c� t� h��: fi!�t
b�r.aus� it was �.�r t�� of �hc� fu�ting. The darnaged �rain
sec�i�n is to be r�paired anc� reaonne�t�d �t ooth er;c�s sa
�ra,er�ioes not cc�;`SeLt�r�:,ond ad the conr,ectit�n.
Du� tc typ� af c�nstru�tic�n a•�d soii cc�r�cfiticns � subs.�,�ac�
drairi is ne�; rEquired arc�tn�fh� adc(�ti�n.
_.____.__._�.__—._---- -___ ___
�---- h2EC(:M�111�:►��ATI'Jh�S�--- ��___.___ _ �. _.�
---.__..____.____,._._.._._.-----_._ _ _ ._� _.._ _ _�._.._ _______.._.--------
FGUh1D1�T'tGN �YPE: A shallovr f�;u��dation systen; utilizing the m�xirr�ur�
�N�vra�I� bearin�; cap��ci,y and eeuiv�lenf fluid �+res�sarA
,:.rovided ir� :his R�:tte6 qc� r��c�sr�me�-�d�� for this s;z�.
�EINFORCING: Rei;7forc.i��c,� sh�ulr�ne dMsigried��a;laUr founc�atidn w�lls to
a�an a rnir7imum c�f'E2 f;et txnder th� dess�n ioad. r=cundatian
�n�afls retaming over f�u�fe�t of scil sh��El� be d�sic�nrYc�ta
r�si�t an equ�vafc��ii fluid �ares�ur�in the active stat�of?8 pcf.
�Ll3CaR�LAC�S: f=lca�r sl�bs c=n yrad�, if an;�. sh�z,�c�b�s��ar�t�d irom
structural �;artic�r�s of the �����ding �nd al�ve�e�ta fiaat freafy.
lntcri�r�ar!ition�nau�t b�can�tria4t�d in sur,h a na��nner that
tl�ey cic �:�t transmit flo�r slab r°r�oW�em�nt to#he raaf or
c�ve�'lyinc fioas-. r�ackfill�lacet4 r,�4�w florr slabs SP�o��l� ��
c�mp�c;t:;d ta a minimum of 90°rn of its maxi;�num Fo°o�;tor c�ry
<,�e;�si#y, :A.Sf�Nt 7-E;�a. Miror cracking o`fl�or slabs on r�°�cii�
is �.ommc�r�. It ps consi�ereU rosm�tic in natur� and do�s ric�f
���cf the stru�:tura.! �nt�grity of the� buil�irg
I7�tAlNA�E A.ND GRA1�IiVU:�rhe graursr.i surfac�witnin 10�e�i oi t�;�k�uildrr�g rriust be
slaptd aw��frcm lh� �uildiri� �+i?h a mi�,irn+�n; �radiPnt�`
___._.�...�----,____�.__---__________..____ __-__...____.._�_..____...._..______.� - .---
t;��i;�righ±2�J9C1-So�l Testing and EnginQ�ring, lnc.
Hu� 1? 10 G8:23a SOlI_ 7ESTIh� E�C3 �15��;���� p. �
.
:?907 Aspen C�r STE Jnb'I�GFi11
�age 3 (1�J12l10
c�rconnM��voar�c�n��
CC3NT'D
5%."rhis is equiraEent ko rix inches of fa i acrq;s this 1C-foot
zane. Concr�te flatwark shoul�-f bp sia�:�ct away�rom th�
build;ng w:th a minirnum ot 1�'r� �ra�ient Where this is ��rt
�osaiblR, a wel(-�efiri�c� sw��le.�hau�r� �ie cc�nstr��ct�rJ t�
intcrcept the surfac�5vate��anet carry i�quic�;iy and��fe{�+
around and away:fror;#f1e building. Plastic shr:uid �ot:be
utilized beneatr c�ecc!-ative rock or b�rK, etc:.A breathabl�
filter fabric shauld be utiii��d '+n I�eu�f�lastic membran�s.
�t:cor��ive edging, ,s�dewa';ks an��ther�I�t+��c�rk sr�a�ki �e
�rE�nned a�7d constr�.acterl so fih�t they d� �a�F�strict raP�i��
surface flo�vs �way frorn�he fou��dati+�n reoic�r�
Ftcof downspouts shauld be exte�ded across all t�a�c�i!!
zar�s �ri�� :�ischar��d :nt�an area ��;�asitive drainage away�
frc�ri th:��;ruc>.ure. �
Ro sad, g;ass, shr�.it�s,fl�wers,tre�s, ar�tner v�c��tatior�
ret�uirin� w�a�er should 'a� placed v��:thin f�.�e fe�;r�f the
foundatFa� or��rif}tsr asty�hac�#i!I zonc. Sprin�'ers must n�;
disch�rge�vat2r�vithir�five#ent af the founda�.ion or�vitr,9n any
bacb:{EI{zan��.
SUBI�RAIhI: ��e "S,�ecia( Consi�eral�an�"fior subsurface�rairiag�
��c�m rr°�er�dati on�.
�AGFS.�=�LPa: C3ackftll arou�-�d found�tians and 'ari �ll �a;ility r.r�r�;17es sho�fd
be �:am�7a�^i�rr t:a �30'� of'tJ mrixim�m �'roctor dr�clensity,
A,S7fv1 C1-;�JB. Backfif) musC L��:iomp�.t�d by rr;ecr�an ca!
meai w� No v,ra;�r�%oaciny*,ech�iqu�s af any ty�;e sn:au'ci b�.
iaspd.
�Uh�GR�"TE: Ai! ccmcr�;te isz ce�ntact wifh the �oii shauld be m�de using a
Typt I� ce�raeni for sulf�'e resistanc� C�icium chyti�id� must
not be adciEd`o a T��p� II r,e�ier�t. ��ur��atiar�farms should
remain in �i�ue for an a��SroNr;atE leng*h of 4im�ir,
accordance witr ACi ,American �'�uncr�te tn:.=tit�.�ie)
rec�arnmend�tiar�s ir�th�/iC;! IViarual ai Stan���d F�ractice,
�a�t�.
Ir�ac�cor•cla�ic«� v►rrth the 20t�3 tntewnatior�al Buildin!�Code
and�roo�t canstruction pracPices, aan�rete rr�u.�t r�at '�e
pla�ecf or. frozen grr�c�nd.
��i1�ARMC:�: The prc?�c�Weci four��at��r� is�n be !c�cated or� nativ�s��!with a
veru io�v expars;on patentiai. �fthaugh th�:expas���ve
potentia!af the s�il is nc�t expected zo caus�rnoverr7e�t o`
fn�!n�aiion con�pc�nents, ii is p�-rssi�le that flatwc�rk may move.
The ��ecc:mi�?en��tioras prcvic��eci ie�this lett�r are inten��d tc
rec�ucct ti�c �nre�tkial tar settl�men*.�f th�fcundatic�n
cornpcnerits R�cc�rr�mt��d�tdorss ��ainina te isalat�nq
__�_ M._._ _.._._...M.___._..�.�._.__...__._._.._._.__.__._.-----------------___.__�.----
Cc��yrigt�t 2010-So'�I�festiri�and Engineering, inc.
- . _` __ . ,. ._ __ . � .�__ t�,��'� .�_����. , . .� __� . __ _� '� - , �.,., .. _�_..
`� ��'��5 ����� �����-� ������
�� �
;�'�o������►;, � � . �:
� Zoursc i o,E �av�,�HMeNTS'> �� '�� �;
�
y` .. . � . '�
T� Martln IHa�el�erie,Tav+r���f'W�it �s�i������ a��N��
From: Rick.W�ir�lman, Fieu�tar i�s�'tcar
'9.7Q`468-1,�29� �JCt. 108 Or �ieV�t�rc�r�t�a'^,w.CC�.�.:;�e
Da�e: 1.0(7/20l t i
Project N�me� Gras�s R��de�r��e I��,I�sAi�� �'�:��.�3-0�.��
' . .
❑ Conveyance I�lan ��vlew
� Conv�yance T'est and Ins{�ct�c�r�
i_c�ateon. 2$q7 ,�.sp�n t������, '���tE�� Cc�.
F'�rmi�: �Ju�t�iber: P�itVCt�;C`ati� 1(l���l
Cor�vey;�ry:,�Ty�: R��i������I ��c�i i���r���er� �}�:;��n����:�r
U -The plans; h��� �n �view�ci �;nr� #:���n�� �t� �'������t�r� t� ��� �����Ric���i� l�S�C' 1.7�:� �nd
I[3C cc�des
�- The raf�ci spe�cJ of the canveyar��� r��Aets A'�l��E ?�;��a 1 r�x��.�������n�s��sA ��e�.i 1� �.ip
dfr�an 43.8 FPM, spe�c3 i� ciawa�r �er�.�,.�tic�r� �'t i.� �?��►Y�
,
� `fYre Conv�eyar�ce at i�e�bove ��:.�tic�n °v�as i��s�����1 �r�t; ����.+� c��' 1C�/r"r,/?�3:i�9 ar►d a:
Cl "T��3POC��.€�'Y C;���i�ea��; ��as i��� �s��.;r�:;.
� ["Ii���,L Insper_tic►r� �'�rtiti��t�; �,a� �...��{§ �ss€.LS�. ,
❑ l�C1 ���r�ifir.�ke, �� ���n� �ssu�?.
❑ i'"�:3l2 C.{:�$,��'.1.1��'.�I'J :�SE' C��E_'�`
C�mment�;
l� � � ,
Signature Gc.�.- ��1�t,•,�,�a,c,�.��-�______ _�.,.w..._��.w
______.___.. ..________._____.wM.._.�.��..... r�. .�. _...�_..___.._��_._.,v....�..---- ----
Nor2?���✓est+�a?o;�dc�Gnu�3cii ni Gcn�+�rn�r��:t�ts � E"�'C,[3<�x� a;� � S;h:�n..,��rr�_ ♦ t�t'� � c��'4QR
9�.^-�G3-a�k`�� �? l-�x::'?u-�SW"!r08 v ,�:.�t;_�;�f:c c:?c?�'a.if°�
;��. _.. _.. _ ..__ ., .,_ ,'l�`i �'ti��81�i,��1.,� . .. _ � : , . - . - ._ _ ��i��� �V�����
Sep 10 �3:40p Morning Slar Elevator ;'19635796$ p 1
-_.._. —_..___ ---------------------- ������� -�-
� � � �ate_��� �-
Nor�;`tawest Coiorado Coun�i� ot �c�v�rnments �,o��
�L�VATOlZ PEE�.!°�IT.�.PF�,�:��m�'I�� '
. ; �-��"`�-� �t...�;
Permit � ���T�._.� �urisdi 'on .._-�'��?rt�r,�r� i` � F.x� l
� __ ..__._. � _.___ -- --..
�>o� -�
Tota! �ee_�, Z�S i�" t��te Pa�d Z2-. '�� .;�E�;�y,i��� ,�,,,�,,.�°:-�'-�.! j � oC pa�es _ --
� Plan Reviewed and Approved'kiy p�t��.s����_o,���°y3,f/�
i rcra <
�l� S_t�i + , � P�rmit�x�irFrkian Date -,Z'�'�,� 1 �
� ** AFF the folaowing mttst be completed by�t�r��I����r�ontractar **
� L�accura'te, iilegible or missing informatlen �il cause �� dr%!a� i� tl�e applic,��ion �,rvicess.
. Please compfete a separate appli�,atio, �f�r c�rr���Iance.
]urisdiction Building Permit #_� 1� "' O����-� t� ���`�' rl `
]ob A�dre.ss�' 2�! C��_���... `-G'v'J�--_ �i`�_...l�',_._r:��___f�-LI.� "�'_-.o�, .
f�-- -
Owner- �� __.�=�'.�s"�'�! � _�, �.
,
Mai(ing Address .�-�'7 _ ,�=t5 Pt;:�: °C�.k;£^�j � (i�,''"Z[,. ��:;< s�'�%"G:''1� __
Phor�e �y .�d�_�`����.x''��-- _ ��x �-W , ,�M! 4 :.i,� 7 �%C? , �
,
Elevatar Cantractar `� � � � ��-r �.'��:up��r�
.�.�."str�.!�1.1_�i�._.. �__ __._�_. �---_.__---_._
Mailiny Addr�s�J„� �(--�`�_ � �1.i%��__t____�'�� ��.,����.w.._`.,�P.�L1_I!?� .��C��� �
I��IORe {i, �l � ��X i`�" r �. s r. � �
— - _.--L�`1_`..;�_�.��.�.�.__._—..---
r--,..:--_._�_._..._...._._._..._..___„ ___�.�_.__.._.....____.�_----�—_,
r** P�rm�ts explre er� o�e year for ne�v instalta[i�ra4.;�r�� �t�:r�r�r9C�s fewr aSt�ra�nns X;;
�,New Instalfatian 1lttit or Contraet# _ __� �.,,,,�,..�_� R �
Alterati on (unif carrnat be retr�rtreC to s�rvlc�unfif�"rrsp�,;�f=c�ar�d�pprnv�d by/Vi�i/CC4�') �
� ;
Describe Work�����_�����,�;�{D-Y,i�,.�.� _�.�_,j;�-��
� -.�-.-w - — - �Q���
NOT�.f„�,!;. ��..��57A�l..i.�T1CJ...�.�
i h�ret7y cErtify that I haWe read and =x3mined this app!icatien Passengtr�.r freEc�S�.r,�tevatar,lut Ea_�,r,a,latar,moving vualkc
and kno.v the same te be trve and :�.:rrea. ,Al�provisions o`{aws Up t��n�:;nchad+�?c� ASO,OOQ n(v�!ua�1�n = �37�.��
and ardlnances govern�ng this type ct work�vlil be cornplied with Over�ti�,U'.?Cs 7f v�luaticn= $3�5.OQ p!us$7.Q0?cr eaG'�
whet��to_r,pecifled her�in or not. i t%�gtanting of a permit drr:� �?,p04.�^4;�„3�-h�r#h�r��rf r�ver�50,OCC.GQ •
not pfes��me to qlve authnrity to vlol.�ce or Cancel the pfovis�on�
of a oth=�sta �r Iocal law regu�t�,g consructlo� or the LI!'t�D:,mh�r�ai?��.-ar�r;vake r�sidenc�e]cavatas-,,
p rma Of ORSff 'on. iJp t?^��h1: 'r+Git+M;irx'�v?(;p00F��:f vdlt�,�+C;�� =- $215.OQ
G�;:er�;C:;,�,,-; ��v��!.�ti�n � Y2?S.f;O r:.��ga.0o r'cs����i
�-L' _ _ SJ,Of��1`) _;:-9'r.'f! ';�'F'+�`�"!gC�?."��f?M1l�?.�u .
�i, ' � _ r�br �Ar'I2'�"'•er;.N,i C,� '
. ��`.�C?R�L?FFtA'1°Tf}'�d�E�;,
�e�S fOC tt"� 3�rra tt JT1�S.�?'?'ii°}1S �d"f:�v?�E� I(t Ta��,e 3-A of t;�e
� �f��e� �-�C s , +° .;� ` 't�.�'�:�fe � ��r.i;arr^Aor r:.t tkr��C����Vr rab e Y A.
—_�'___— y 'l�eill+y�," �}U ���,.�~ ��s..�;.!�;��i�iY �t� �� ��� ���
� 4 ����J1i � ����� i �- ..o.�..�_.�-��—.--...��._... �— —
�i ,I}� �-•• { ,{� .
���0 ��,�i ( 4`��✓
y" CJj'�R._[311bt�9�;f`I�ru I�� rPd�Q � S fzj�, "�•6J�t�1� �}'"��`°. ...._.. •�� ". . ._....... .__..._,._._
. C' � ' �iy�'�I F�T������ �q�.� � t .t� . __ _ _..e.,..._. _
aC,I�; ^a(1�11R� � ,�+.�e7���4 ..1:,-�"'W J, � ` .1�,p�:���iF�,.�. i� ,:'�;;'f,��:.• �; r ! y -r L�'-'d�/�.fJ
�.P1�t ��t�I.a�T�.`�1*'r�, °�� �`i ur?1.��.i�i�.t"f�S ������yr�µ � t �� j . j�'.�� C---���f�(i�.::� �,�JJ��
�i�l��:L't�l;.���,2i��3 ���e:.�� ��'�'i�,a�°�l:��?;�'�leJ S�J�,�; J �'� r�I li
� ,�'t ,/� y���,,�
�^���i'' - '�`;'�:�';�`����;;[��a�'` �<�';; ,,�`.�.�„i�'� °�y�-
—_._. _ _-_------_..__.,._._.�___..._�.__.
_._..�_-----
Etevctor pian revle�v and field i;i�pections w1H be canducted by the �iort`:t.+les`��:alar:�r�c� �ouncil or'Gov�rr.ments. i'lans wil!
be rorwarded� NWCCOG+or revie��r and approval. Sr_hedu'ie ir,specrio�s by rcn#acking the NY�}CCOG Edevator Insperf.�or a`
! 970-116$-0295 e�:?O8.
-- —��. ---------------
.�__.N. �_ �
�, ��,�
Ru� 1� iL C1E�: ?�a SOII__ TF_�7It�� ENG '719591t1F�fJ7 p. 5
- ' /� �G7 �i l�`� lr y ' /� J�,, f�,
28�7:� 'r�Gt ���� .J/ �t/ ��V�
A� � � �T"E Job �'��0£i'1 i
Page�l ,
� fl8112.�90
R�;CCTf�1h1�1VLita�"fC1�hlS
---._._�_.,_____..____w_.�_.______ __.__._.._. CONT'I� � �
_`.____._ ----�- -- -------__.._...._ ��,-��
flatuverk fro:n siructural �nd non-structural cam�orents of fhe
t�;l�Yinc� �rz irst�ndpd Eu reduc�the �otentia(for darnage tt�
th�sup�rstructu�2.
.�>tdGC°S&fL1I Ct7rs'rruc:t!on an� �rforrnanc�de�ends on;he
i�r��l�mentati�.m af�I� of t�e recorr�m�ndatians providecf.
Prc�oi�ms,ar�lik�ly iP�n�O af th�recorrim�����N�Ci�ns are nc�:
f{.,�li�vt��d� or'rf any of the syszems fail. Agair;, fallowing rt��e
recc�n�rnF�ndatio�s is cor�,sidereci hrud�nt; �����r�v�r, it is not a
�w�uarant�e that r�nv��r�aeret wrill not o��e�r.
CLt7�ING l�hi� reper? h:as been �repar�d in ac�cor�:fance wiin generally
acc:e�ted er�ginec�ring stamq�rds cf practi�e for the time and
r��inn. Na �ath?r c�u�rante�s or warranti�s ar�eith�r
ex�r�sse�:! c�r i��plieci.
!t is �yr�eoa'tt7at t�7e prc�fessiona!s�rvices at th� �r��rri�P:-
��o r�r�t�:xtend tc.��r inci:�d.y cc�nst�ructi�n sup�rv6sion of th��n
ccynkractGr`s ��vor;�or�erfi�ar�ance, It is furthGr�,c,�r��ed ihat
t"E own��r ,h��l!dF�ttind, is�demnify and hcid i7arr�lvaS tFIF'
��9����+``rc�n ars}+ cia'rrn c�r�;uit whatsnev+�r, incl�d'sr�c�, but
nc:9 fim'ted t,�, a;l �ra�r.r,��,ts, exp�ri��s a�costs irvo;vP�
arisiny from, ar �'le�e�tc� ��v�arise,., from the conkractar`s
�ei�orm�n�:� ur ikie fai!ur�o'th� ca;nt�act�r"s woric?a
�•o,'����rm fo �ne�r�siyn anten:. It�s fi�e cor�fractor's
responsiE�iliiy to ensure t��a#adequat� c�nstruction
:�up��,�ision ;;; r�rcvidLd u� that tre irter�; af the
r�v�mm�rrrlati�ns c:an b� met.
1�J�trust this provides t��e inforrnatiu� ti�o�_; re�;:.esred. 5hc�ulc q�lestians �ri�e ccr,c:erning
this rn�t#er,do nc�t �e,�iat� i;� cal9.
F��s�ecifui;y subrr�itt�d, T�IIS ��Q,�I;Ir(yt,{,��,�NT WAS
SCtiL 7�STiNG AN'� ��fClNEEtZ1NG ISv�. F��,�, ���n` ,R MY
�.��,� . �N:
�^%�� � (.�--� `�-��r�-"�-�""" -�• � I�^/ fi�=
..,/ � ��_.
L�r� . C'-�isrY�:��, Frar�cijaal � :s Magnussr�f�`�==.
. •�
�:UVt✓!rn5s �'%!,`�cf'� .re,• ��.��h��`.
"��rf %jjRi A L E�,����>
�;frorltld�:a!in�ivls0'!G`11�r�$9 1 ''0��u,;1r:�„y�„r,:�
�_ ____�.._._.____.___._. __..._.�_.,.-__.___—___�_�
_-_Co{xyri�7ht 2n1C!-;�o�('Cnsting anr,�(��gine��iny, Inc. .._�___r_�_.._.--.__..--
10 -1010 Inspection Request Reporting ' Page 20
9:26 am Vail, CO - City Of
Requested Inspect Date: Thursday, October 07, 2010
** Approved **
Assigned To: JMONDRAGON
mdenney
idaa Plan
Inspection Type: BLDG
VIINGgress rept
Inspection Area: CG
nspector:
mdenney
Site Address: 2807 ASPEN CT VAIL
** Approved **
A/P /D Information
MDENNEY
Activity: B10 -0138 Type: A -BUILD
Sub Type: ASFR
Status: ISSUED
Const Type: Occupancy:
Use: IRC
Insp Area: CG
Owner: GRASIS QUALIFIED PERSONAL RESIDENCE -
Phone: 476 -1005
Contractor: GRASIS, AUGUST
Phone: 970 - 476 -1005
Description: ADDITION OF RESIDENTIAL ELVATOR & GARAGE
Re uested Ins i s
I m: j nal
Requested Time:
02:30 PM
Requ stor: GRASIS GUST
Phone:
970 - 476 -1005
Com ents: 719 -650 8
Assigne To: JMONDON
Entered By:
JMONDRAGON K
Acti . Time Exp:
Inspection History
Item: 10 BLDG -F
Item: 504 PW -Re
Item: 502 PW -Rc
Item: 20 BLDG -F
Item: 21 P
Item: 410
Item: 22 P
Item: 30 B
Item: 50
)TING
ning Wall
h D"rivew,
fj
O t t, )
C , I M
on /Steel
** Approved **
nspector:
mdenney
idaa Plan
VIINGgress rept
** Approved **
nspector:
mdenney
I
** Approved **
nspector:
MDENNEY
liv_
Action: AP APPROVED
Action: AP APPROVED
Action: AP APPROVED
Item: 60 BLDG- Sheetrock Nail ** Approved **
09/21/10 Inspector: mdenney Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 70 BLDG -Mist. ** Approved **
09/08/10 Inspector: Martin Action: DN DENIED
Comment: Install tlashing and wetherprotection at garage
09/10/10 Inspector: CG Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: LATH
Item: 535 DIA - 30 DAY REMINDER
Item: 536 DIA - SITE /LANDSCAPING
Item: 533 PLAN -TEMP. C/O
Item: 420 Special Inspect -final rept
Item: 503 PW -Final Driveway Grade
Item: 542 PLAN -FINAL
Item: 90 BLDG -Final
69
REPT131 Run Id: 12036