Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
B10-0164
MAR TOWN OF VAIL Mr. Gary Hill Hill Construction, Inc PO Box 1735 Edwards, Colorado 81632 Attn: Mr. Hill, August 1, 2011 Subject: Summary of Materials Testing, Allen Residence, 925 Fairway Drive, Vail, Colorado Job Number: 10 -6586 This letter summarizes the materials testing GROUND Engineering Consultants, Inc. (GROUND) performed during the construction of 925 Fairway Drive in Vail, Colorado. The materials testing services were performed at times scheduled by the Contractor and /or Subcontractors between September 23, 2010 and June 1, 2011. During construction, representatives of our office performed periodic testing on the structural concrete placed for the foundation and floor slab. Samples of the structural concrete were periodically tested to determine physical properties and compressive strength. Structural steel welded and bolted connections were periodically observed during construction by a certified welding inspector (CWI). These observations were completed at times scheduled by the Owner, Contractor or Subcontractor. Based on the final test results to date, field observations, RFI's received and other project documentation received from the design team, it is our opinion that the materials tested and /or observed for the structural concrete and structural steel were in general accordance with project plans, specifications, or applicable RFI's. The observations and materials testing as indicated above were performed periodically to provide data to the Owner, Contractor and Subcontractors to assist them in evaluating the general compliance of the tested materials and /or work with the contract documents at the times of our observation and testing. We did not supervise, direct or have any control over any of the Contractor's or Subcontractor's work. We were not responsible for the Contractor's or Subcontractor's scheduling of our services, means, methods, procedures, techniques, or sequences of construction, nor responsible for ensuring that any Contractor or Subcontractor performed or completed the work in accordance with the contract documents or construction industry standards. �Holulm ENGINEERING CON.S'ULTRNTS INC. 101A Airpark Dr., Lhtil 9. PO Box 461, Gypsum, CO 51637 Phone (970) 524 -0720 Fax (970) 521 -0721 .groundeng,com Olf'rce Locations: Engle%%ood . Commerce Ciq Loveland Granby Gypsum Grand Junction Casper, %VY 310 - 01 (,`f Castro Residence, 925 Fairway Drive Vail, Colorado If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact our office. Sincerely, GROUND Engineering Consultants, Inc. Digitally signed by Evan Kuhn Evan Kuhn ON: cn =Evan Kuhn, o= GROUNDENG, 0—Gypsum, CO, email– EvanK@GroundEng.com, c =US Date: 2011.08.14 11:11:18 -06'00' Evan E. Kuhn C / v: R f s � 45426 G Reviewed by Scott Richards, P.E. �IOr,' MAR G ? TOWN OF VAIL Job No. 10.6586 GROUND Engineering Consultants, Inc. Page 2 of 2 B it) - o 1(,Pq WNOFYAII, ' FINAL REPORT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS Pr Allen Residence Improvements Project Location: 925 Fairway Drive owner Larry and Lori Allen Address • 925 Fairway Dri cit Vai Zi 81657 GROUND Engineering Consultants, Inc. (Sp. Inspector Address: P.O. Box 464; 101A Airpark Drive, Unit 9 City: Gypsum State: Colorado Zip: 81637 p Phone (970 )524 -0720 Fax: (970)524 -0721 E -mall: chrishogrou To the best of my Information, knowledge, and bellef, the special Inspections and /or testing required for [his project, have been completed In accordance with the contract documents. Interim reports submitted prior to this Final Report of Spacial inspections form a basis for, and are to be considered an integral part of this final report. Any disorepanclas that were noted In all interim reports have been corrected. Prepared by: Scott Richards, P.R. S L'_L 7 sore tVam Signature Data -'12- PermltNumber: BIO -0164 45426 Preparer's Seal and Signature Required MAR 0 2 I tt TOWN OF VAIL g (40 , 02 - 29 - 2012 Inspection Request Reporting Page 1 4:16 pm Vail, CO - City Of Requested Inspect Date: Thursday, March 01, 2012 Inspection Area: CG Site Address: 925 FAIRWAY DR VAIL WEST SIDE A/P /D Information Activity B10 -0164 Type: B -BLD Sub Type: NDUP Status: ISSUED Const Type 102 Occupancy: Use: VB Insp Area: CG Owner ALLEN, LARRY M. & LORI L. Contractor: HILL CONSTRUCTION INC Phone: 328 -2200 Description: N A � ' I 1 WO- FAMILY DWELLING ll et Requested I•_,•ection s c m; V0 h Item 537 PLAN -FINAL CIO -, r yQ 6t equested Time: 08:00 AM Requestor HILL CONSTRUCTION INC t•y k' SIo Phone: 328 -2200 Comments 390 -3413 1 Assigned To BGIBSON � V nAtk- r Entered By: JMONDRAGON K Action Time Exp: Item 539 PW -FINAL CIO Requested Time: 10:30 AM Requestor HILL CONSTRUCTION INC Phone: 328 -2200 Comments 390 -3413 Assigned To JMONDRAGON Entered By: JMONDRAGON K Action Time Exp: Item 540 BLDG -Final CIO Requested Time: 09:30 AM Requestor HILL CONSTRUCTION INC Phone: 328 -2200 Comments 390 -3413 Assigned To JMONDRAGON Entered By: JMONDRAGON K Action Time Exp: fi Inspection History Item: 501 PW- Access /Staging /Erosion Item: 10 BLDG - FOOTING 11/03/10 Inspector: JRM Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: PARTIAL FOOTING SOUTH WEST NOT READY DUE TO DIRT STORAGE.. SOILS REPORT REC';D ADDED TO FILE N. 12/13/10 Inspector: JRM Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: APPROVED WEST SIDE FOOTING 04/08/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: top cap at main level SW fire place 04/08/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: DN DENIED Comment: Exterior SW fireplace CMU missing horizontal reinforcement at 16" 08/29/11 Inspector: s Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: APPROVED ENTRY FOOTER WEST SIDE Item 504 PW- Retainingg Wall Layout Item 502 PW -Rough LJriveway Grade Item 20 BLDG - Foundation /Steel ** Approved ** 11/10/10 Inspector: Martin Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: All exterior walls except stairs and grage walls Missing required horizontal bars at garage 11/12/10 Inspector: CG Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION REPT131 Run Id: 14173 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES TOW O VO Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 NEW (SFR,P /S,DUP) PERMIT Permit #: B10 -0164 Project #: PRJ10 -0049 Job Address: 925 FAIRWAY DR VAIL Location......: WEST SIDE Parcel No....: 210108116015 OWNER ALLEN, LARRY M. & LORI L. 450 SHERWOOD RD 234 CLEARWOOD LN LA 71105 APPLICANT HILL CONSTRUCTION INC PO Box 1735 Edwards CO 81632 License: 267 -A CONTRACTOR HILL CONSTRUCTION INC PO Box 1735 Edwards CO 81632 License: 267 -A 07/07/2010 07/07/2010 Phone: 328 -2200 07/07/2010 Phone: 328 -2200 Description: NEW DWELLING UNIT FOR TWO- FAMILY DWELLING Occupancy Type Totals... Number of Dwelling Units: Occupancy: R3 Type Construction: VB Status .. : ISSUED Applied ..: 07/07/2010 Issued...: 04101/2011 Expires ...: 03/21/2011 Town of Vail Adjusted Valuation: $1,320,000.00 Total Sq Ft Added: 4759 ....., ...« ..................................... ..x............... FEE SUMMARY ...............,,.. ...............�..........,.... ,..... «..........., Building Permit Fee ------ > $6,776.75 Will Call --------------------------- > $5.00 Total Calculated Fees ------- — ---- > $38,320.49 Plan Check--------------- - - - - -> $4,404.89 Use Tax Fee --------------------- > $26,200.00 Additional Fees------------------ - - - - -> $0.00 Add'I Plan Check Hours -> $220.00 Restuarant Plan Review --- > $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES --- ---------- > $38,320.49 Investigation------------ - - - - -> $0.00 Recreation Fee ---------------- > $713.85 Payments -- ---------------------------- > $38,320.49 Total Calculated Fees ------ > $38,320.49 BALANCE DUE------------------ - - - - -> $0.00 DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the informatior as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHA BE MADE TWENTY -FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM. i e of Owner or Contractor Date I I-L Print Name Factor Sq Feet Valuation 4,759 $1,320,000.00' n ew_co nstructio n_pe rm it- 041908 *rt * * * * * *rtrtfifi * * * * *rtrtrtrt *fi * * * * ** rtrt* fi***** rtrtrtfifi * * *Rrtrtrtrtfi * * * * *rtrtrtfi * * * * *rtrtrtfi * ** *rtrt *fi * * * *rtrtrtfi * * * *rtrtrtfirt *R * R * rtrt *fi * * * *rtrtrtrtfiR * *rtrtrtrtfi *R* firt *R * * * *rt *fifi * * *rtrtrtfi * * * *rtrtfififi* *firt *fi ** *rtrt *fifi * ** *rtfi * * * *firtfifi APPROVALS Permit #: B10 -0164 as of 09 -16 -2011 Status: ISSUED ***** rtrtrtfi****** rtrtrtfi******** rtrtrtrtfiR**** rtrtrtrtrtfi** * *rtrtrtrtfi # * * * * *rtrtrt*fi * * * **rtrtrtfi * * ** *rtrtrt * * * ** *rtrt * * * * * * ** *rtrtrt * * * * ** *rtrtrt * * * * * ** rtfi * * * ** rtrt * * * * * *rt ** rtfi * *Rrtrt rtrt *fi * * *rtrtrtfifi * *rtrtrtrt * * * ** *rtrtfi * * * *rtfirtfi * * ** Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 07/26/2010 Martin Action: DN Gary please have the following items addressed and resubmit. Sheet A3.4 1. Roof overhang over the property line to be pulled back to within the property. Sheet A6.1 1. How is the stone veneer wall to be attached to the building. Reference section R703.7 IRC. Sheet A6.2 1. Provide listing for the proposed fire rated assemblies in detail 12 Sheet A6.3 1. Provide listing for blocking of wall in detail 5 Sheet A7.5 1. Clarify on the plans that there is only 2 fireplace log sets within the building. Sheet A10.1 1. Annotate on plans that co and smoke detectors shall be include with the alarm system. Sheet S1 1. Clarify if special inspection is required. If required please include the special inspection form available on the Town of Vail web page. Sheet M2.0/M2.3 1. Plans reflect the outside air within 3 feet of the property line. Required to be protected. General Comment 1. Clarify if the proposed condensing units have enough clearance for the roof. Thank Martin 08/16/2010 Martin Action: AP 03/25/2011 Martin Action: DN 1. Proivdwe revised structural plans for change to the beam pokets 2. Smooth out the flue and remove exposed steel Item: 05110 ELECTRICAL REVIEW 07/27/2010 Matt Denney Action: AP Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 09/02/2010 bgibson Action: AP plans routed to C4 Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT new stru ctio n_perm it_041908 07/13/2010 mvaughan Action: DN Insufficiant water main shown for domestic and sprinkler. Contacted architect and advised. 09/02/2010 mvaughan Action: AP monitored fire alarm and sprinkler system required 12/09/2010 mvaughan Action: AP revisions approved Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 08/04/2010 salli Action: DN remove encroachments from golf course easement construction access is not approved in the proposed location. 08/18/2010 cdelles Action: DN Construction access is not approved in proposed location 09/02/2010 cdelles Action: AP Item: 05101 BUILDING DEPT REVISION 03/31/2011 Martin Action: AP Revision #1 06/16/2011 MD Action: AP APPROVED REVISION FOR EXTERIOR DETAILS ON SHEATHING AND NEW U VALUE UPDATE See the Conditions section of this Document for any that may apply. n ew_co nstruction_pe rm it_041908 •+ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxr , rrr rxxxxxxx+ xxxxxx+. x• xwxx xxwxxxxxxxvrxxxxxxxxv. exxxxx++ x. xxxxxxxexxxxx . +xxxxxx +rxxxxrxxxx CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit #: B10 -0164 as of 09 -16 -2011 Status: ISSUED xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxx. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cond: 33 (PLAN) THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRED A SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY. SUCH SURVEY SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO REQUEST FOR A FRAME INSPECTION. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 42 (BLDG 2009) CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED PER 2009 IRC R315 new st ru ct i o n_pe rm it_041908 Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado, - .81657 Tel- 970-47 Z Fax- ,970 -7479' ;. Web �iiv,Iil+v_vai��o #� Developmenf.� Revision Submittals: 1. "Field Set' of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved & the permit is re- issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are $55.00 per hour (2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. Permit #(s) information applies to: Attention: BID -bl (0q -)Nler ap-51"C e (2 ()Qevisions ( ) Response to Correction Letter _attached copy of correction letter ( ) Deferred Submittal ( ) Other Project Street Address: Z 5 �aif Dr. (Number) (Street) /� I ` (Suite #) Building /Complex Name: A�I1PEV dQhCe. Contact Information: Company: r Company Address: O— ?X 237E City: JFAt.&7041ds State: Ca zip: 8t (05 Contact Name: N $era I u rJ 'Contact Phone: 1 y 7 - Z 3N E -Mail have el' �W c lur 1 COQ Description / List of Changes: *,W k or : t ,l I -o `J IcX OU I t �2 I I �oT kd- II O r 4ke n� A 2 mkt l bad \1 AR NMT • O Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building: Plumbing: Electrical: Mechanical: Total: (use additional sheet if necessary) Date Received: I B E MAY 2 5 2011 TOWN OF VAIL 01- Jan -to TRANSMITTAL FORM BERGLUND Architects, LLC TRANSMITTAL DATE May 25, 2011 TO Town of Vail Martin Haeberle Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 970.479.2128 970.479.2452 Fax FROM Hans Berglund RE Detail Revisions for the Allen Residence at 925 Fairway Drive Lot 1 VV Filing VIA Hand Delivery ENCLOSED (2) Copies of the sheets with revisions bubbled COMMENTS Attached is a copy of the detail revisions per your request. Below is a list of the sheets with the date of the revision and all revisions are bubbled. Sheet A6.1 Details- 05/20/11- Revised details showing exterior finish attached over drainage medium /air infiltration barrier over horizontal 1 x4s over exterior foam over structural sheathing Sheet A6.2 Details- 05/20/11- Revised details showing exterior finish attached over drainage medium /air infiltration barrier over horizontal 1 x4 over exterior foam over structural sheathing Sheet A6.3 Details- 05/20/11- Revised details showing exterior finish attached over drainage medium /air infiltration barrier over horizontal 1 x4 over exterior foam over structural sheathing Sheet A6.4 Details- 05/20/11- Revised details showing exterior finish attached over drainage medium /air infiltration barrier over horizontal 1 x4 over exterior foam over structural sheathing Sheet A8.1 Window and Door Sched. & Details- 05/20/11- Revised schedule details showing exterior finish attached over drainage medium /air infiltration barrier over horizontal 1 x4s over exterior foam over structural sheathing Sheet A8.1 Window and Door Sched. & Details- 05/20/11- Revised schedule details showing exterior finish attached over drainage medium /air infiltration barrier over horizontal 1 x4s over exterior foam over structural sheathing Sheet A8.2 Steel Window Elevations- 05 /20 /11- Called out all steel windows per revised schedule Sheet A8.3 Steel Window and Door Details- 05/20/11- Revised schedule details showing exterior finish attached over drainage medium /air infiltration barrier over horizontal 1x4s over exterior foam over structural sheathing Please let us know if there are any questions or comments. Thank you very much. P.O. Box 2378, Edwards, CO 81632 Tel: 970 926 -4301 fax: 970 926 -4364 Window Callout Label U -Value Percent of Windows Jeld -Wen Casement 0.27 13% Jeld -Wen Fixed 0.23 5% Jeld -Wen Awning 0.26 1% Jeld -Wen Outswing Patio Door 0.37 6% Total Window SF 1788 Jeld -Wen Sliding Door 0.34 8% Hopes Steel Windows 0.324 44% Weighted U -value 0.337361 Hopes Lift and Slide 0.426 22% Total 6 100% Window Callout Label SF U -Value UA 20 -Jeld -Wen Out Swing Patio Door (x2) 54 0.37 19.98 31 -Jeld -Wen Casement (x2) 18 0.27 4.86 126 -Jeld -Wen Sliding Patio Door 142 0.34 48.28 132 -Jeld -Wen Double Out swing Patio Door 54 0.37 19.98 212 -Jeld -Wen Awning (x2) 14 0.26 3.64 233 -1eld -Wen Awning 6 0.26 1.56 285 -Jeld -Wen Casement (x2) 36 0.27 9.72 288 -Jeld -Wen Casement (x4) 60 0.27 16.2 289 -Jeld -Wen Casement (x2) 24 0.27 6.48 294 -Jeld -Wen Casement 9 0.27 2.43 350 -Jeld -Wen Vinyl Fixed 4 0.23 0.92 404 -Jeld -Wen Casement (x2) 22 0.27 5.94 803 -Jeld -Wen Casement (x6) 36 0.27 9.72 804 -Jeld -Wen Fixed (x6) 72 0.23 16.56 805 -Jeld -Wen Fixed (x2) 18 0.23 4.14 806 -Jeld -Wen Casement (x2) 36 0.27 9.72 A- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed 45 0.324 14.58 B- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed 36 0.324 11.664 C- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed (x2) 56 0.324 18.144 D- Hope's Jamestown Heavy Custom Outswing Doc 27 0.426 11.502 E- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed 6 0.324 1.944 F- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed (x2) 60 0.324 19.44 G- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed (x2) 26 0.324 8.424 H- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed (x2) 22 0.324 7.128 I- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed (x2) 26 0.324 8.424 J- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed (x2) 48 0.324 15.552 K- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed (x2) 20 0.324 6.48 L- Hope's Jamestown Heavy Lift and Slide Door 118 0.426 50.268 M- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed (x2) 36 0.324 11.664 N- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed (x2) 36 0.324 11.664 0- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed (x4) 132 0.324 42.768 P- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed (x4) 52 0.324 16.848 Q- Hope's Jamestown Heavy Lift and Slide Door 171 0.426 72.846 R- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed 14 0.324 4.536 S- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed 14 0.324 4.536 T- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed 14 0.324 4.536 U- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed 14 0.324 4.536 V- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed 36 0.324 11.664 W- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed (x2) 50 0.324 16.2 X- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed 38 0.324 12.312 Y- Hope's Jamestown Heavy Lift and Slide Door 74 0.426 31.524 Z- Hope's Jamestown 175 Fixed 12 0.324 3.888 MAY 2 6 2011 TOWN OF VAIL NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES YOWNOFVAKU Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 NEW (SFR,P /S,DUP) PERMIT Permit #: B10 -0164 Project #: PRJ10 -0049 Job Address: 925 FAIRWAY DR VAIL Status .. : ISSUED Location......: WEST SIDE Applied..: 07/07/2010 Parcel No....: 210108116015 Issued ...: 09/22/2010 Expires ...: 03/21/2011 OWNER ALLEN, LARRY M. & LORI L. 07/07/2010 Town of Vail Adjusted Valuation: $1,320,000.00 450 SHERWOOD RD Type Construction: 234 CLEARWOOD LN .................................................. LA 71105 FEE SUMMARY ...........,...... ,.............._,__.... .......,......,,.......,..,.... APPLICANT HILL CONSTRUCTION INC 07/07/2010 Phone: 328 -2200 $6,776.75 Will Call --------------------------- > $5.00 Total Calculated Fees ------------- > $38,210.49 PO Box 1735 $4,404.89 Use Tax Fee --------------------- > $26,200.00 Additional Fees------------------ - - - - -> $0.00 Edwards $110.00 Restuarant Plan Review --- > $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES--------- - - - - -> $38,210.49 CO 81632 $0.00 Recreation Fee ---------------- > $713.85 License: 267 -A Payments ------------------------------- > CONTRACTOR HILL CONSTRUCTION INC 07/07/2010 Phone: 328 -2200 Total Calculated Fees ------ > $38,210.49 BALANCE DUE ------------------------ > PO Box 1735 Edwards CO 81632 License: 267 -A Description: NEW DWELLING UNIT FOR TWO- FAMILY DWELLING Occupancy Type Factor Sq Feet Valuation Totals... 4,759 $1,320,000.00' Number of Dwelling Units: Occupancy: Town of Vail Adjusted Valuation: $1,320,000.00 Type Construction: Total Sq Ft Added: 4759 .................................................. ............................... FEE SUMMARY ...........,...... ,.............._,__.... .......,......,,.......,..,.... Building Permit Fee ------ > $6,776.75 Will Call --------------------------- > $5.00 Total Calculated Fees ------------- > $38,210.49 Plan Check--------------- - - - - -> $4,404.89 Use Tax Fee --------------------- > $26,200.00 Additional Fees------------------ - - - - -> $0.00 Add'I Plan Check Hours -> $110.00 Restuarant Plan Review --- > $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES--------- - - - - -> $38,210.49 Investigation------------ - - - - -> $0.00 Recreation Fee ---------------- > $713.85 Payments ------------------------------- > $38,210.49 Total Calculated Fees ------ > $38,210.49 BALANCE DUE ------------------------ > $0.00 DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SH#LL BE MADE TWENTY -FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM. ignature of 15wner or tractor Date Print Name new_construct ion_perm it_041908 APPROVALS Permit* B10 -0164 as of 04 -01 -2011 Status: ISSUED Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 07/26/2010 Martin Action: DN Gary please have the following items addressed and resubmit. Sheet A3.4 1. Roof overhang over the property line to be pulled back to within the property. Sheet A6.1 1. How is the stone veneer wall to be attached to the building. Reference section R703.7 IRC. Sheet A6.2 1. Provide listing for the proposed fire rated assemblies in detail 12 Sheet A6.3 1. Provide listing for blocking of wall in detail 5 Sheet A7.5 1. Clarify on the plans that there is only 2 fireplace log sets within the building. Sheet A10.1 1. Annotate on plans that co and smoke detectors shall be include with the alarm system. Sheet S1 1. Clarify if special inspection is required. If required please include the special inspection form available on the Town of Vail web page. Sheet M2.0/M2.3 1. Plans reflect the outside air within 3 feet of the property line. Required to be protected. General Comment 1. Clarify if the proposed condensing units have enough clearance for the roof. Thank Martin 08/16/2010 Martin Action: AP 03/25/2011 Martin Action: DN 1. Proivdwe revised structural plans for change to the beam pokets 2. Smooth out the flue and remove exposed steel Item: 05110 ELECTRICAL REVIEW 07/27/2010 Matt Denney Action: AP Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 09/02/2010 bgibson Action: AP plans routed to C4 Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT new nstruction_perm it_041908 07/13/2010 mvaughan Action: DN Insufficiant water main shown for domestic and sprinkler. Contacted architect and advised. 09/02/2010 mvaughan Action: AP monitored fire alarm and sprinkler system required 12/09/2010 mvaughan Action: AP revisions approved Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 08/04/2010 salli Action: DN remove encroachments from golf course easement construction access is not approved in the proposed location. 08/18/2010 cdelles Action: DN Construction access is not approved in proposed location 09/02/2010 cdelles Action: AP Item: 05101 BUILDING DEPT REVISION 03/31/2011 Martin Action: AP Revision #1 See the Conditions section of this Document for any that may apply. new construction_permit_041908 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit #: B10 -0164 as of 04 -01 -2011 Status: ISSUED Cond: 33 (PLAN) THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRED A SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY. SUCH SURVEY SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO REQUEST FOR A FRAME INSPECTION. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 42 (BLDG 2009) CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED PER 2009 IRC R315 new stru ct ion_perm it_041908 c"as a;' n ": o'f"+ r 's -k: .°_,+'°;.+r' j` .. 75 SOl ` - l y 3 �t ..' 9 r -fLG v � s'YIM .,.,.�3 M, '+ •°. � "4 .y. ^ .d: C'31 i? .. a'�.'C'�. .J. `� .�� /,,.- a •:• 3_ '� T_ .ep Y a t 0 DgV0 elten TRANSMITTAL FORM Revision Submittals: 1- "Field Set" of approved plans MUST accompany revisions_ 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved & the permit is re- issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are $55.00 per hour (2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. Permit #(s) information applies to: Attention: 13� - Q I Cry Project Street Address: _� 1-5 A ikWAT n/Z►yL_ (Number) (Street) (Suite #) Building /Complex Name: Contact Information: Company: )A I L L- Cain \ / ICl C Company Address: pt3 City: State: �� Zip: Contact Name: plY ILL, Contact Phone: 3 q Q 3`[ 13 E -Mail 1L-L (I0) cyay - L , N z.l Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building: $ , Q O Plumbing: $ Electrical: $ Mechanical: $ Total: $ �, Revisions () Response to Correction L _attached copy of correc () Deferred Submittal O Other i I Description / List of Changes: I I (use additional sheet if necessary) Date Received: IE C IE 0 V D n MAR 3 0 2011 letter OF V, 1-41M tv G4�� 0 November 1, 2010 Hill Construction, Inc. Attn: Gary Hill „r !_ P. O. Box 1735 6(b- Edwards, Colorado 81632 ( 94ahi cucentulyld Job No, 110 121 B Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Allen Duplex, Lot 1, Filing 10, Vail Village, 925 Fairway Drive, Vail, Colorado Dear Gary: As requested, a representative of Iepworth- Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on October 29, 2010 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. The services were performed u1 as part of our agreement for professional engineering services to Hill Construction, Inc., dated August 27, 2010. Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated May 28, 2010, Job No. 110 121A. We also observed the excavation for the Castro portion of the duplex at 935 Fairway Drive, report dated September 7, 2010, Job No. 110 121 B. 1'he Allen portion of the duplex is to the west and will be a two story wood frame structure over a walkout basement level with slab -on -grade ground floors. Our previous report recoirunended spread footings bearing on the natural soils designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf for support of the building. At the time of our site visit, the foundation excavation was essentially complete and had been cut in two levels from about 3 to 16 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of stiff, very sandy silty clay with scattered gravel and small cobbles. There was sore old fill in the floor slab areas. Results of swell - consolidation testing performed on samples taken from the site shown on Figure 1, indicate the clay soils are moderately compressible under conditions of loading and wetting. into tree water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were generally moist. In about the eastern one half of the excavation, the subgrade was frozen. At this time, we recommended the bearing soils be thawed and protected from freezing conditions. w Hill Construction, Inc. November 1, 2010 Page 2 The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. Loose and disturbed soils should be removed in the footing areas to expose the undisturbed natural soils and the subgrade compacted. The bearing soils should be protected from frost and concrete should not be placed on frozen soils. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH — PAWLAK s David A. Young, PT.-al. DAY. /ksw attachment Figure 1, S w Joh No. 110 1 2113 GY,TY fHNICAL, INC. O It '� ell -P—t i soli dation Test Results Gi � Ch NOTE; THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES RINW n¢ Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 NEW (SFR,P /S,DUP) PERMIT Permit #: B10 -0164 Project #: Job Address: 925 FAIRWAY DR VAIL Status .. : Location......: EAST SIDE Applied. . Parcel No....: 210108116015 Issued ... Expires ...: OWNER ALLEN, LARRY M. & LORI L. 450 SHERWOOD RD 234 CLEARWOOD LN LA 71105 APPLICANT HILL CONSTRUCTION INC PO Box 1735 Edwards CO 81632 License: 267 -A CONTRACTOR HILL CONSTRUCTION INC PO Box 1735 Edwards CO 81632 License: 267 -A 07/07/2010 07/07/2010 Phone: 328 -2200 07/07/2010 Phone: 328 -2200 Description: NEW DWELLING UNIT FOR TWO- FAMILY DWELLING Occupancy Type Totals... Number of Dwelling Units: Occupancy: Type Construction: Town of Vail Adjusted Valuation: Total Sq Ft Added: .................................................. ............................... FEE SUMMARY .......,., PRJ 10 -0049 ISSUED 07/07/2010 09/22/2010 03/21/2011 $1,320,000.00 0 Building Permit Fee - -> $6,776.75 Will Call ---------------- -- ------- > $4.00 Total Calculated Fees--- —> $37,385.64 Plan Check-------- -----> $4,404.89 Use Tax Fee--------- - - - - -> $26,200.00 Additional Fees---------- ----- > $0.00 Add'I Plan Check Hours -> $0.00 Restuarant Plan Review --- > $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES- - - - - -> $37,385.64 Investigation ------------ - - -> $0.00 Recreation Fee------ - - ---> $0.00 Payments - - - -- -------- - - - - -> $37,385.64 Total Calculated Fees - - ---> $37,385.64 BALANCE DUE---------------- ---- -> $0.00 DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALLyBE MADE TWENTY -FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4:00 re of Owner or Contractor Date Print Name Factor Sq Feet Valuation $1,320,000.00" new_construction _pe rm it- 041908 APPROVALS Permit #: B10 -0164 as of 09 -22 -2010 Status: ISSUED Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 07/26/2010 Martin Action: DN Gary please have the following items addressed and resubmit. Sheet A3.4 1. Roof overhang over the property line to be pulled back to within the property. Sheet A6.1 1. How is the stone veneer wall to be attached to the building. Reference section R703.7 IRC. Sheet A6.2 1. Provide listing for the proposed fire rated assemblies in detail 12 Sheet A6.3 1. Provide listing for blocking of wall in detail 5 Sheet A7.5 1. Clarify on the plans that there is only 2 fireplace log sets within the building. Sheet A10.1 1. Annotate on plans that co and smoke detectors shall be include with the alarm system. Sheet S1 1. Clarify if special inspection is required. If required please include the special inspection form available on the Town of Vail web page. Sheet M2.0/M2.3 1. Plans reflect the outside air within 3 feet of the property line. Required to be protected. General Comment 1. Clarify if the proposed condensing units have enough clearance for the roof. Thank Martin 08/16/2010 Martin Action: AP Item: 05110 ELECTRICAL REVIEW APPROVAL 07/27/2010 Matt Denney Action: AP Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 09/02/2010 bgibson Action: AP plans routed to C4 Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/13/2010 mvaughan Action: DN Insufficiant water main shown for domestic and sprinkler. Contacted architect and advised. new_co nstructio n_perm it_041908 09/02/2010 mvaughan Action: AP monitored fire alarm and sprinkler system required Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 08/04/2010 salli Action: DN remove encroachments from golf course easement construction access is not approved in the proposed location. 08/18/2010 cdelles Action: DN Construction access is not approved in proposed location 09/02/2010 cdelles Action: AP See the Conditions section of this Document for any that may apply. new construction _permit_041908 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit #: B10 -0164 as of 09 -22 -2010 Status: ISSUED Cond: 33 (PLAN) THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRED A SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY. SUCH SURVEY SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO REQUEST FOR A FRAME INSPECTION. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 42 (BLDG 2009) CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED PER 2009 IRC R315 new_construction_perm it_041908 Separate permits are required for electrical, plumbing, mechanical, fireplace, etc. � Project Street Address: l Office Use: �� I L Q — r) � �� " rl` t�.i U `, V f Project #: {� (Number) , (Street) (Suite #) DRB #: �/*Z-61 (3G 1 Building /Complex Name: ,/ L� � �.1 � -�(�( Building Permit #: �� 0 — t )� Contractor Information: Company: _1- )L- , cod fl--N )qc— Company Address: _ 1�. D City:( ln��.S State: Zip: Contact Name: ��--A RA 14 14—IL— Contact Phone: E -Mail /L1 J�J Town of Vail Contractor Registration No.: X Contractor Signature (require Lot #: Block # Subdivision: Detailed Scope and Location of Work: - )spa &mil b UJ>J LIN J \T__t — D VIP- IL M + O)A iYl 4 C1 d i C Ck'h * C+-1 (use addit nal sheet if necessary) Work Class: New Addition ( ) Remodel ( ) Repair ( ) Other ( ) Work Type Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Both (Xf Property Information Type of Building: Parcel #: Single - Family ( ) Duplexjl�<_Multi- Family ( ) (For parcel #, contact Eagle County Assessors Office at 970 - 328 -8640 or l ia Commerc visit www.eaglecounty.us/patie) ( ) Other( ) Tenant Name: 4A4�4h Does a Fire Alarm Exist? Yes No( ) � ��� 1CJ�� h-ltl �(� Monitored Alarm? Yes (kj No( ) Owner Name: Does a Sprinkler System Exist? Yes k'�<) No( ) Valuations (Labor & Materials) Building: Plumbing: $ 30 , 000 Electrical: $ 4 40, no(3 Mechanical: (including fireplace) $ SO , oo 0 Total: $ 0 d. # & Type of Existing Fireplaces: Gas Appliances Gas Logy Wood /Pellet Wood Burning # & Type of Proposed Fireplaces: Gas Appliances ! 7 Gas Log Wood /Pellet Wood Burning Date Received: JUL 0 7 2010 TOWN OF VAIL 15- May -10 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CODE COUNCIL! 2009 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE CERTIFIED HOME This home built at 925 Fairway Drive, Vail, CO by exceeds the minimum requirements for the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code May 18, 2010 The organization below certifies that the proposed building design described herein Is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with the penult application. The proposed building has been designed to most the 2008 IECC requirements in compliance with Chapter 4 based on Climate Zone 6B and with all mandatory retirements. Name: Andrew Dionne Signature: Organization: A ct i ve E Inc. Date: Jun 29 , 2010 The International Code Council Logo and 2009 International Energy Conservation Code are registered trademarks of the International Code Coundl, Inc. REiWRata - Residential Energy Analysis and Rating Software v12.82 Building Features Ceiling Flat NA Duct: NA Vaulted Ceiling: R-63, R-41 Window: U -Value = 0.260, SHGC = 0.190 Above Grade Walls: R -30, R -20 Integrated: Natural gas, Htg eff 0.95 CAafue. DHW eff 0.95 CAef. Foundation Walls: R -28.0 Cooling N/A Exposed Floor: R-41 Slab: R -10.0 Edge, R -10.0 Under The organization below certifies that the proposed building design described herein Is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with the penult application. The proposed building has been designed to most the 2008 IECC requirements in compliance with Chapter 4 based on Climate Zone 6B and with all mandatory retirements. Name: Andrew Dionne Signature: Organization: A ct i ve E Inc. Date: Jun 29 , 2010 The International Code Council Logo and 2009 International Energy Conservation Code are registered trademarks of the International Code Coundl, Inc. REiWRata - Residential Energy Analysis and Rating Software v12.82 2009 IECC ANNUAL ENERGY COST COMPLIANCE 3961 3950 ' Date: June 29, 2010 Rating No.: Window U- Factor (Design must be lower): 0.400 0.288 Building Name: Allen Residence Rating Org.: Active Energies, Inc. PASSES Owner's Name: Larry and Lori Allen Phone No.: 970 - 3061233 Property: 925 Fairway Drive Rater's Name: Andrew Dionne Address: Vail, CO 81657 Rater's No.: 121 Builder's Name: Weather Site: Vail, CO Rating Type: Projected Rating File Name: Allen Residence.blg Rating Date: May 18, 2010 Annual Energy Cost 2009 IECC As Designed Heating: 2469 2461 Cooling: 0 0 Water Heating: 182 182 Lights & Appliances: 1129 1127 Photovoltaics: -0 -0 Service Charge: 180 180 Total: 3961 3950 ' Window U- Factor Check (per Section 402.5) Window U- Factor (Design must be lower): 0.400 0.288 Home Infiltration per Section 402.4.2: PASSES Duct Leakage per Section 403.2.2: PASSES This home MEETS the annual energy cost requirements in accordance with Section 405 of the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code based on a climate zone of 6B. " D Name: Andrew D Signature: Organization: A Energies, Inc. Date: June 29, 2010 _._ ...... __ ....... -- - -- - - - - -.. .....__.. —_�. i Design energy cost is based on the following systems: Integrated Htg1DHW: Total cap 166.3 k8tuh. Htg eff 0.95 CAafue. DHW eff 0.95 CAef. Cooling: Air conditioner, 0.1 k8tuh, 13.0 SEER. Window- to-Floor Area Ratio: 0.43 Blower door test Htg: 0.30 Clg: 0.30 ACHnat In accordance with IECC, building inputs, such as setpoints, infiltration rates, and window shading may have been changed prior to calculating annual energy cost. Furthermore, the standard reference design HVAC system efficiencies are set to the "prevailing federal minimum standards" as of January, 2009. These standards are subject to change, and software updates should be obtained periodically to ensure the compliance calculations reflect current federal minimum standards. REM /Rate - Residential Energy Analysis and Rating Software v12.82 This information does not constitute any warranty of energy cost or savings. 01985-2010 Architectural Energy Corporation, Boulder, Colorado. 2009 IECC OVERALL BUILDING UA COMPLIANCE Date: June 29, 2010 Building Name: Allen Residence Owner's Name: Larry and Lori Allen Property: 925 Fairway Drive Address: Vail, CO 81657 Builder's Name: Windows and Doors: Weather Site: Vail, CO File Name: Allen Residence.blg Rating No.: Rating Org.: Active Energies, Inc. Phone No.: 970 - 306 -4233 Rater's Name: Andrew Dionne Rater's No.: 121 Rating Type: Projected Rating Rating Date: May 18, 2010 Elements Insulation Levels 2009 IECC As Designed Shell UA Check Type U -Value Ceilings: 67.9 47.7 Above -Grade Walls: 193.2 126.4 Windows and Doors: 605.8 498.9 Slab Floor, Heated: 7.0 5.2 Floors Over Garage: 17.5 14.2 Basement Walls: 58.1 38.0 Overall UA (Design must be lower): 949.6 730.5 Window U- Factor Check (per Section 402.5) R -29.9 BIC +Sth G1 0.036 Window U- Factor (Design must be lower): 0.400 0.288 This home MEETS the overall thermal performance requirements of the International Energy Conservation Code based on a climate 280.0 zone of 6B. (Section 402, International Energy Conservation Code, 2009 edition.) In fact, this home surpasses the requirements by R -19.8 BIC G1 23.1%. 99.0 Joist Building Elements Type U -Value Area Ceilings Roof R -62.5 12" Ext G1 0.015 1256.2 Roof R -63.3 4" Ext +BIC G1 0.016 810.4 Roof R-41.4 BIC G1 0.028 545.0 Above -Grade Walls Wall R -29.9 BIC +Sth G1 0.036 2869.2 Wall R -19.8 BIC G1 0.060 280.0 Wall R -19.8 BIC G1 0.060 99.0 Joist Ambient 0.027 230.0 Joist Adiabatic 0.036 10.8 Windows and Doors Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 27.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 27.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 4.0 0023 RUStIc Terrace, P.O. Box 6871 , Breckenridge, CO 80424 Tel: 970.389.4988, Email: dcleary.cdc @gmad.com ALLEN RESIDENCE LOT 1, VAIL VILLAGE FILING 10 - 925 FAIRWAY DRIVE - VAIL, COLORADO DEMAND LOAD CALCULATIONS, SINGLE FAMILY -- SINGLE PHASE (PER NEC 220-3B THROUGH 220 -19) EQUIPMENT TAG QUANTITY VOLTAMPS/ DEMAND TOTAL VA/ GENERAL LIGHTING LOAD (yy) FACTOR W GENERAL LIGHTING SMALL APPLIANCE 4210 SF A X 3 X LAUNDRY 2 A X 1500 X 1 2630 1 A X 1500 X = 3000 ,TOTAL = 1500 1 ° 3kVA @ 100 % = 17130 REMAINDER @ 35% = 3000 NET LOAD = 4946 = 7946 OWNER EQUIPMENT & APPLIANCES: CONNECTED DEMAND RGE (48" WOLF RANGE (48" DUAL FUEL) WOLF 1 EA X LOAD LOAD W EA X 10200 1500 X X 10200 100% 8000 DRYER(ELEC) DISHWASHER 2 EA X 5000 X 3000 10000 100% - 3000 WINE COOLER 2 EA X 1200 X 2400 100% - 75% - 10000 DISPOSAL I 1 A X 400 X 400 75% - - 1800 300 FRIDGE /FREEZER 1 A X 975 X 975 75% 731 UNDER COUNTER FRIDGE 1 EA X 1200 X 1200 75% = 900 HOOD A X 600 X 600 75% - MICROWAVE 1 1 EA X 1200 X 1200 75% - 450 900 FIREPLACE (GAS APPLIANCE W/ FAN) 5 A X EA X 1600 X 1 60 0 75% = 1200 ( TOTAL 250 X 1250 1 00% = 1250 HVAC / MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT- = 28531 BOILERS B -1 8 B-2 CONDENSING UNIT CU 2 EA X 600 X 1200 100% = -1 CONDENSING UNIT CU -2 1 1 A X EA X 6000 2600 X 6000 100% = 1200 6000 PUMPS P -1 to P -9 PUMP 9 EA X 525 X X 2600 100% = 2600 P -10 '. DUCT HATER DH 1 A X 25 X 4725 25 100% = 100% = 4725 -1 FAN COIL 1 Hp FC -1 1 1 EA X EA X 2000 0 X 2000 100% = 25 2000 FAN COIL '/. Hp FC-2 1 A X 70 700 X X 1920 100% = 1920 ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATOR ERV -1 1 A X 317 X 700 100% = 700 ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATOR R & 1 A X 120 317 100% - 317 HUMIDIFIER H-1 H 2 2 EA X 1900 X X 120 100% 120 EXHAUST FAN EF 1 1 EA X 23 X 3800 100% = 3800 EXHAUST FAN EF 2 1 A X 90 X 23 100 23 EXHAUST FAN EF 3 SUPPLY FAN 90 32 100% _ 90 SF -1 TOTAL 1 A X 79 X 79 100% = 100 % = 32 79 ADDITIONAL ELECTRIC UTILIZATION EQUIPMENT, = 23631 HEAT TAPE 385 LINEAR 12 X JACUZZI TUBS (OTY.B LOAD ASSUMED) 2 FTx EA X 4620 125% = 5775 HOT TUB (GRANDEE) 1 EA X 2400 11500 X X 4800 100 % 4800 TOTAL 11500 100 = 11500 NET COMPUTED LOAD - - ___. -_. -. -- -.. 16300 - NET COMPUTED LOAD, CONSIDERING 220.60 NONCOINCIDENTAL TOTAL 85322 82183 LOADS ')r•;,;'#$ . .,. � ., � . ra*:iv. :Le,na .. *, -,:.. __.... TOTAL 80702 76408 -• ••••.•«.. wewa Rnu � V / UKC UNGADES RECOMMENDED SERVICE SIZE: 382 AMPS ESTIMATED QTY- OF (42) LOADCENTERS 4210 400 AMP (- � SPA BR C — -FT) / _.. 50 84.2 -SPARES. . _ -__ 96 CIRCUR'S 2.3 I. NOTES: -_- - C ALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. 2. HAT TAPE IS CONSIDERED A NONCOINCIDENTAL LOAD TO THE A/C CONDENSING UNITS PER NEC 220.60. 3. NEC 220.53 APPLIANCE LOAD DEMAND F ACTOR 75% FOR (4) OR MORE, NOT INCLUDING HAT, AC, RANGE OR DRYER. Building Elements Type U -Value Area Window 0.35/0.31 0.350 54.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 24.0 Window 0.35/0.31 0.350 54.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 70.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 56.0 Window 0.30/0.24 0.300 70.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 70.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 70.0 Window 0.35/0.31 0.350 40.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 15.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 15.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 27.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 36.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 10.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 80.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 45.0 Window 0.35/0.31 0.350 20.0 Window 0.30/0.24 0.300 168.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 18.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 18.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 27.0 Window 0.35/0.31 0.350 54.0 Window 0.30/0.24 0.300 144.0 Window 0.30/0.24 0.300 120.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 60.0 Window 0.30/0.24 0.300 180.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 40.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 15.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 24.0 Window 0.26/0.19 0.260 9.0 Door 1 -3/4 wood solid core 0.329 20.0 Door 2 -1/4 Wd solid core 0.268 20.0 Slab Floor, Heated On -Grade Perimeter R -10Per R -10Un 10'wd 0.045 115.5 Floors Over Garage Floor R-41.4 BInC G1 0.027 531.0 Basement Walls Wall R -10Ext R -18Cav BIC 0.027 448.4 Wall R -10Ext R -18Cav BIC 0.025 1041.9 Wall R -10Ext R -18Cav BIC 0.025 163.1 REM /Rate - Residential Energy Analysis and Rating Software v12.82 © 1985 -2010 Architectural Energy Corporation, Boulder, Colorado. 0023 Rustic Terrace, P.O. Box 687 1 , Breckenridge, CO 80424, Tel: 970.389.4988, Email: dcleary.cdc @gmail.com ALLEN RESIDENCE LOT 1, VAIL VILLAGE FILING 10 - 925 FAIRWAY DRIVE - VAIL, COLORADO DEMAND LOAD CALCULATIONS, SINGLE FAMILY -- SINGLE PHASE (PER NEC 220-3B THROUGH 220 -19) EQUIPMENT QUANTITY VOLT AMPS/ DEMAND TOTAL VA/ TAG (VV) FACTOR GENERAL LIGHTING LOAD: GENERAL LIGHTING 4210 SF EA X 3 X = 12630 SMALL APPLIANCE 2 EA X 1500 X = 3000 LAUNDRY 1 EA X 1500 X = 100 (TOTAL 17130 1" 3kVA @ 100 % = 3000 REMAINDER @ 35% = 4946 NET LOAD = 7946 CONNECTED DEMAND OWNER EQUIPMENT & APPLIANCES: !! LOAD LOAD RANGE (48" WOLF DUAL FUEL) 1 EA X 10200 X 10200 100% = 8000 WASHING MACHINE 2 EA X 1500 X 3000 100% = 3000 DRYER (ELEC) 2 EA X 5000 X 10000 100% = 10000 DISHWASHER 2 EA X 1200 X 2400 75% = 1800 i, WINE COOLER 1 EA X 400 X 400 75% = 300 DISPOSAL 1 EA X 975 X 975 75% = 731 FRIDGE /FREEZER 1 EA X 1200 X 1200 75% = 900 UNDER COUNTER FRIDGE 1 EA X 600 X 600 75% = 450 HOOD 1 EA X 1200 X 1200 75% = 900 MICROWAVE 1 EA X 1600 X 1600 75% = 1200 j FIREPLACE (GAS APPLIANCE WI FAN) 5 EA X 250 X 1250 100% = 1250 !TOTAL = 28531 HVAC / MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: BOILERS B-1 & B -2 2 EA X 600 X 1200 100% = 1200 ! CONDENSING UNIT CU -1 1 EA X 6000 X 6000 100% = 6000 !, CONDENSING UNIT CU -2 1 EA X 2600 X 2600 100% = 2600 PUMPS P -1 to P -9 9 EA X 525 X 4725 100% = 4725 PUMP P -10 1 EA X 25 X 25 100% = 25 DUCT HEATER DH -1 1 EA X 2000 X 2000 100% = 2000 FAN COIL 1 Hp FC -1 1 EA X 1920 X 1920 100% = 1920 FAN COIL 1 /. Hp FC -2 1 EA X 700 X 700 100% = 700. ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATOR ERV -1 1 EA X 317 X 317 100% = 317 !; ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATOR ERV -2 1 EA X 120 X 120 100% = 120 l HUMIDIFIER H -1 & H -2 2 EA X 1900 X 3800 100% = 3800 EXHAUST FAN EF -1 1 EA X 23 X 23 100% = 23 EXHAUST FAN EF -2 1 EA X 90 X 90 100% = 90 EXHAUST FAN EF -3 1 EA X 32 X 32 100% = 32 ! SUPPLY FAN SF -1 1 I 'ITOTAL EA X 79 X 79 100% = 79 = 23631 ADDITIONAL ELECTRIC UTILIZATION EQUIPMENT: HEAT TAPE 385 LINEAR 12 X 4620 125% = 6776' JACUZZI TUBS (OTY. & LOAD ASSUMED) 2 EA X 2400 X 4800 100% = 4800 HOT TUB (GRANDEE) 1 EA X 11500 X 11500 100% = 11500 'i, TOTAL = 16300 NET COMPUTED LOAD TOTAL 85322 82183 NET COMPUTED LOAD, CONSIDERING 220.60 NONCOINCIDENTAL LOADS TOTAL 80702 76408 CM �f +4�14SE. 3 Wit S1t10 , £ .:. 76146 =fl 2 5 336 AMPS a 31 ° k PUTECIOADAtD�Igibitb 'kl1DONT101f]11.CApACITX 968 ALLOMNG FOR 20% ADDITIONAL CAPACITY FOR UNFORSEEN LOADS AND FUTURE UPGADES 382 AMPS j RECOMMENDED SERVICE SIZE: 400 AMP ESTIMATED QTY. OF (42) SPACE BRANCH CIRCUIT LOADCENTERS 4210 (SQ -FT) / 50 84.2 WI SPARES = 98 clRcurrs 2.3'x, NOTES: 1. CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. 2. HEAT TAPE IS CONSIDERED A NONCOINCIDENTAL LOAD TO THE A/C CONDENSING UNITS PER NEC 220.60. 3. NEC 220.53 APPLIANCE LOAD DEMAND FACTOR 75% FOR (4) OR MORE, NOT INCLUDING HEAT, AC, RANGE OR DRYER 0023 Rustic Terrace, P.O. Box 6871 , Breckenridge, CO 80424 Tel: 970.389.4988, Email: dcleary.cdc @gmail.com ALLEN RESIDENCE LOT 1, VAIL VILLAGE FILING 10 - 925 FAIRWAY DRIVE - VAIL, COLORADO DEMAND LOAD CALCULATIONS, SINGLE FAMILY -- SINGLE PHASE (PER NEC 220-36 THROUGH 220 -19) EQUIPMENT QUANTITY VOLT AMPS/ DEMAND TOTAL VA/ TAG FACTOR ' GENERAL LIGHTING LOAD: GENERAL LIGHTING 4210 SF EA X 3 X = 12630 SMALL APPLIANCE 2 EA X 1500 X = 3000 LAUNDRY 1 EA X 1500 X = 1500 '.TOTAL = 17130 1 3kVA @ 100% REMAINDER @ 35% = 4 NET LOAD - 7946 CONNECTED DEMAND OWNER EQUIPMENT & APPLIANCES: LOAD LOAD RANGE (48" WOLF DUAL FUEL) 1 EA X 10200 X 10200 100% = 8000 WASHING MACHINE 2 EA X 1500 X 3000 100% = 3000 DRYER(ELEC) 2 EA X 5000 X 10000 100% = 10000 DISHWASHER 2 EA X 1200 X 2400 75% = 1800 WINE COOLER 1 EA X 400 X 400 75% = 300 DISPOSAL 1 EA X 975 X 975 75% = 731 FRIDGE/FREEZER 1 EA X 1200 X 1200 75% = 900 UNDER COUNTER FRIDGE 1 EA X 600 X 6D0 75% = 450 HOOD 1 EA X 1200 X 1200 75% = 900 MICROWAVE 1 EA X 1600 X 1600 75% = 1200 FIREPLACE (GAS APPLIANCE WI FAN) 5 EA X 250 X 1250 100% = 1250 :TOTAL _ - 28531 HVAC I MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: BOILERS B -1 & B-2 2 EA X 600 X 1200 100% = 1200 CONDENSING UNIT CU -1 1 EA X 6000 X 6000 100% = 6000 CONDENSING UNIT CU -2 1 EA X 2600 X 2600 100% = 2600 PUMPS P -1 to P -9 9 EA X 525 X 4725 100% = 4725 PUMP P -10 1 EA X 25 X 25 100% = 25 DUCT HEATER DH -1 1 EA X 2000 X 2000 100% = 2000 '.. FAN COIL 1 Hp FC -1 1 EA X 1920 X 1920 100% = 1920 FAN COIL % Hp FC -2 1 EA X 700 X 700 100% = 700 ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATOR ERV -1 1 EA X 317 X 317 100% = 317 ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATOR ERV -2 1 EA X 120 X 120 100% = 120 HUMIDIFIER H -1 & H -2 2 EA X 1900 X 3800 100% = 3800 EXHAUST FAN EF -1 1 EA X 23 X 23 100% = 23 EXHAUST FAN EF -2 1 EA X 90 X 90 100% = 90 EXHAUST FAN EF -3 1 EA X 32 X 32 100% = 32 SUPPLY FAN SF-1 1 EA X 79 X 79 100% = 79 .TOTAL _ - 23631 ADDITIONAL ELECTRIC UTILIZATION EQUIPMENT ; HEATTAPE 385 LINEAR 12 X 4620 125% = 5776 JACUZZI TUBS (QTY. & LOAD ASSUMED) 2 EA X 2400 X 4800 100% = 4800 HOT TUB (GRANDEE) 1 EA X 11500 X 11500 100% = 115 , TOTAL--- -- - -- = 16300 ' NET COMPUTED LOAD TOTAL 85322 82183 NET COMPUTED LOAD, CONSIDERING 220.60 NONCOINCIDENTAL LOADS TOTAL 80702 76408 ALLOWING FOR Abb" IA1L CAPACITY FOR UNFORSEEN LOADS AND FUTURE UPGADES 382 AMPS RECOMMENDED SERVICE SIZE: qpp AMP E STIMAT ED QTY. OF (4 2) SPACE BRA CIR CUIT LOADCENTERS 4210 (SOFT) / 50 - _ - - 84.2 m sVAREs - 98 clRcurrs 2.31 —.._ NOTES: -- - -... - -- -- - - - -. 1. CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. 2. HEAT TAPE IS CONSIDERED A NONCOINCIDENTAL LOAD TO THE A/C CONDENSING UNITS PER NEC 220.60. 3. NEC 220.53 APP LIANCE LOAD DEMAN FACTOR 75% FOR (4) OR MORE, NOT INCLUDI HEAT, AC , RANGE OR DRYER 0023 Rustic Terrace, P.O. Box 6871 , Breckenridge, CO 80424, Tel: 970.389.4988, Email: dcleary.cdc @gmail.com ALLEN RESIDENCE LOT 1, VAIL VILLAGE FILING 10 - 925 FAIRWAY DRIVE - VAIL, COLORADO DEMAND LOAD CALCULATIONS, SINGLE FAMILY -- SINGLE PHASE (PER NEC 220-38 THROUGH 220 -19) EQUIPMENT VOLT AMPS/ TAG QUANTITY (W) GENERAL LIGHTING LOAD: GENERAL LIGHTING 4210 SF EA X 3 X SMALL APPLIANCE 2 EA X 1500 X LAUNDRY 1 EA X 1500 X TOTAL 1" 3kVA @ 100 % - REMAINDER @ 35% �NETLOAD CONNECTED OWNER EQUIPMENT 8 APPLIANCES: LOAD RANGE (48 WOLF DUAL FUEL) 1 EA X 10200 X 10200 WASHING MACHINE 2 EA X 1500 X 3000 DRYER(ELEC) 2 EA X 5000 X 10000 DISHWASHER 2 EA X 1200 X 2400 WINE COOLER 1 EA X 400 X 400 DISPOSAL 1 EA X 975 X 975 FRIDGE/FREEZER 1 EA X 1200 X 1200 UNDER COUNTER FRIDGE 1 EA X 600 X 600 HOOD 1 EA X 1200 X 1200 MICROWAVE 1 EA X 1600 X 1600 I , FIREPLACE (GAS APPLIANCE W/ FAN) 5 EA X 250 X 1250 TOTAL ... HVAC / MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: ''. BOILERS B -1 S B -2 2 EA X 600 X 1200 CONDENSING UNIT CU -1 1 EA X 6000 X 6000 CONDENSING UNIT CU -2 1 EA X 2600 X 2600 PUMPS P -1 to P -9 9 EA X 525 X 4725 PUMP P -10 1 EA X 25 X 25 DUCT HEATER DH -1 1 EA X 2000 X 2000 FAN COIL 1 Hp FG1 1 EA X 1920 X 1920 FAN COIL % Hp FG2 1 EA X 700 X 700 ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATOR ERV -1 1 EA X 317 X 317 ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATOR ERV -2 1 EA X 120 X 120 HUMIDIFIER H -1 8 H -2 2 EA X 1900 X 3800 EXHAUST FAN EF -1 1 EA X 23 X 23 EXHAUST FAN EF -2 1 EA X 90 X 90 EXHAUST FAN EF -3 1 EA X 32 X 32 SUPPLY FAN SF -1 1 EA X 79 X 79 TOTAL ADDITIONAL ELECTRIC UTILIZATION EQUIPMENT: HEAT TAPE 385 L N� 12 X 4620 JACUZZI TUBS(OTY. B LOAD ASSUMED) 2 EA X 2400 X 4800 HOT TUB (GRANDEE) 1 EA X 11500 X 11500 TOTAL NET COMPUTED LOAD TOTAL 85322 NET COMPUTED LOAD, CONSIDERING 220.60 NONCOINCIDENTAL LOADS TOTAL 80702 DEMAND FACTOR 100 100 100 75% 75% 75 75% 75% 75% 75% 100 100 100 100 100 100 100% 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100% TOTAL VA/ (M 12630 3000 1500 17130 3000 4946 7946 DEMAND LOAD 8000 3000 10000 1800 300 731 900 450 900 1200 1250 28531 1200 6000 2600 4725 25 2000 1920 700 317 120 3800 23 90 32 79 23631 125 % = 3775 100% = 4800 100% = 11500 16300 82183 I 76408 ALLOWING FOR 20% ADDITIONAL. CAPACITY FOR UNFORSEEN LOADS AND FUTURE UPGADES 382 AMPS 1 RECOMMENDED SERVICE SIZE: 400 AMP ESTIMATED QT Y. OF (42) SPACE BRA NCH CIRCUIT LOA 4210 (SQ -FT) / 50 84.2 W/ SPARES - 98 Cx1CLUS 2.31 NOTES: - - -- - -- - - -- - _ _.. - 1. CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME, 2. HEAT TAPE IS CONSIDERED A NONCOINCIDENTAL LOAD TO THE A/C CONDENSING UNITS PER NEC 220.60. 3. NE 220.53 APPLIANCE LOAD DEMAND FACTOR 75% FOR (4) OR MORE, NOT INCLUDING HEAT, AC, RANGE OR DRYER. 0023 Rustic Terrace, P.O. Box 6871 , Breckenridge, CO 80424, Tel: 970.389.4988, Email: dcleary.cdc @gmail.com ALLEN RESIDENCE LOT 1, VAIL VILLAGE FILING 10 - 925 FAIRWAY DRIVE - VAIL, COLORADO DEMAND LOAD CALCULATIONS, SINGLE FAMILY -- SINGLE PHASE (PER NEC 220-38 THROUGH 22D -19) TOTAL NET COMPUTED LOAD NET COMPUTED LOAD, CONSIDERING 220.60 NONCOINCIDENTAL LOADS VOLT AMPS/ EQUIPMENT DEMAND QUANTITY TAG SF EA X GENERAL LIGHTING LOAD: X = GENERAL LIGHTING 1500 4210 SMALL APPLIANCE EA X 2 LAUNDRY = 1 TOTAL CONNECTED I 3kVA @ 100 LOAD REMAINDER @ 35% EA X 10200 NET LOAD 100% _ EA X OWNER EQUIPMENT & APPLIANCES X 3000 RANGE (48" WOLF DUAL FUEL) EA X 1 WASHING MACHINE 100% _ 2 DRYER(ELEC) X 2400 2 DISHWASHER 400 2 WINE COOLER EA X 1 DISPOSAL 75% _ 1 FRIDGE/FREEZER X 1200 1 UNDER COUNTER FRIDGE 600 1 HOOD EA X 1 MICROWAVE 75% _ 1 FIREPLACE (GAS APPLIANCE WI FAN) X 1600 5 TOTAL 250 X 1250 HVAC / MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: EA X 600 BOILERS B -1 & B-2 2 CONDENSING UNIT CU -1 1 CONDENSING UNIT CU -2 1 PUMPS P -1 to P -9 9 PUMP P -10 1 DUCT HEATER DHA 1 FAN COIL 1 Hp FC -1 1 FAN COIL Y. Hp FC -2 1 ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATOR ERV -1 1 ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATOR ERV -2 1 HUMIDIFIER H -1 & H -2 2 EXHAUST FAN EF -1 1 EXHAUST FAN EF -2 1 EXHAUST FAN EF -3 1 SUPPLY FAN SF -1 1 TOTAL EA X 90 ADDITIONAL ELECTRIC UTILIZATION EQUIPMENT: 100% _ HEAT TAPE 32 385 JACUZZI TUBS(OTY. B LOAD ASSUMED) EA X 2 HOT TUB (GRANDEE) 100% _ 1 TOTAL NET COMPUTED LOAD NET COMPUTED LOAD, CONSIDERING 220.60 NONCOINCIDENTAL LOADS VOLT AMPS/ DEMAND (W) FACTOR SF EA X 3 X = EA X 1500 X = EA X 1500 X = CONNECTED LOAD EA X 10200 X 10200 100% _ EA X 1500 X 3000 100 % _ EA X 5000 X 10000 100% _ EA X 1200 X 2400 75% _ EA X 400 X 400 75% _ EA X 975 X 975 75% _ EA X 1200 X 1200 75% _ EA X 600 X 600 75% _ EA X 1200 X 1200 75% _ EA X 1600 X 1600 75% _ EA X 250 X 1250 100 % _ EA X 600 X 1200 100% _ EA X 6000 X 6000 100 % _ EA X 2600 X 2600 100% _ EA X 525 X 4725 100% _ EA X 25 X 25 100% _ EA X 2000 X 2000 100% _ EA X 1920 X 1920 100% _ EA X 700 X 700 100 % _ EA X 317 X 317 100% _ EA X 120 X 120 100% _ EA X 1900 X 3600 100% _ EA X 23 X 23 100% _ EA X 90 X 90 100% _ EA X 32 X 32 100% _ EA X 79 X 79 100% _ I TOTAL VA/ 12630 3000 1500 17130 3000 4946 7946 DEMAND LOAD 8000 3000 10000 1800 300 731 900 450 900 1200 1250 28531 1200 6000 2600 4725 25 2000 1920 700 317 120 3800 23 90 32 79 23631 LINEAR 12 X 4620 125% = 5776 FT X EA X 2400 X 4800 100% = 4800 EA X 11500 X 11500 100% = 11500 16300 TOTAL 85322 82183 TOTAL 60702 76408 1 ALLOWING FUR 20 ADOITIONAL CAPAC" FOR UNFORSEEN LOADS AND FUTURE UPGADES 382 AMPS j RECOMMENDED SERVICE SIZE: 400 AMP ESTIMATED QTY. OF (42) SPAC BRANCH CIRCUIT LOA DCENTERS 4210 (SCI-FT) / 50 84.2 wi SPARES - 98 CIRCUITS 2.: NOTES: 1. CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. 2. HEAT TAPE IS CONSIDERED A NONCOINCIDENTAL LOAD TO THE A/C CONDENSING UNITS PER NEC 220.60. 3. NEC 220.53 APPLIANCE LOAD DEMAND FACTOR 75% FOR (4) OR MORE, NOT INC LUDING HEAT, AC, RANGE O DRYER. G4 tech HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED ALLEN /CASTRO DUPLEX LOT 1, FILING 10, VAIL VILLAGE 925 FAIRWAY DRIVE VAIL, COLORADO JOB NO. 110 121A MAY 28, 2010 PREPARED FOR: LARRY ALLEN 925 FAIRWAY DRIVE, WEST UNIT VAIL, COLORADO 81657 �`41 1 1'. TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY .......................... ............................... - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION .................................................. ............................... - 1 - SITECONDITIONS .................................................................... ............................... - 2 FIELDEXPLORATION ............................................................. ............................... - 2- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2 ................................................... ............................... - - FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS 3- ................................ ............................... - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 3- .............................................. ............................... FOUNDATIONS - ..................................................................... ............................... FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS 3- .......................... ............................... FLOOR SLABS - 4- ....................................................................... ............................... UNDERDRAINSYSTEM - 6 - ....................................................... ............................... SITEGRADING - 6 - ..................................................................... ............................... SURFACEDRAINAGE - 7 - .......................................................... ............................... - 7- LIMITATIONS ...................... ... .................................................. - 8- ........... FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - SWELL - CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed duplex to be located at Lot 1, Filing 10, Vail Village, 925 Fairway Drive, Vail, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Larry Allen dated May 10, 2010. We previously conducted a geologic site assessment of the property and presented.our findings in a report dated May 26, 2010, Job No. 110 121A. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed duplex will be a two story wood frame structure above a walkout basement with an attached garage. Basement and garages floors will be slab -on- grade. The garage floor may be structurally supported above the basement level. Grading for the structure could be relatively extensive with cut depths up to about 15 feet on the uphill side and 4 feet on the downhill side. The existing duplex will be razed prior to construction and the proposed duplex will be located in the same area and extend west. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. Job No. 110 121A GgRech -2- If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re- evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The existing duplex is a tall 2 two story wood frame structure above a walkout basement. The site is located at the base of a north facing hillside along the downhill side of Fairway Drive as shown on Figure 1. The ground surface is relatively flat along the roadway and becomes steeply sloping down to the valley bottom. Vegetation consists of landscaped lawn with scattered aspen and evergreen trees. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on May 20, 2010. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by atruck- mounted CNIE -45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. There was no drill rig access to the lawn part of the lot. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D -1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered' at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils, below about 7 to 10% feet of man- placed fill, consist of gravelly clay and Job No. 110121A Ggtech 511 sand overlying clayey sand, gravel and cobbles with boulders. Drilling in the dense granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit at Boring 1. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and density and percent finer than sand size gradation analyses. Results of swell- consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples, presented on Figure 4, indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked I day later and the subsoils were moist to slightly moist with depth. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The natural subsoils below the man - placed fill and any topsoil are adequate for support of spread footing foundations. Alf existing fill and debris should be removed from beneath the proposed duplex footprint. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. Based on experience, we expect Job No. 110 I21A G&5teCh -4- settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their be elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 42 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) The existing fill, topsoil, loose or disturbed soils and debris should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the firm natural soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moisture adjusted optimum and compacted. If water seepage is encountered, the footing areas should be dewatered before concrete placement. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on -site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the duplex and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on -site soils. Job No. 110 121 A G99tech -5- All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use Iarge equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. A hi er compa ionTve7wnd use of Tlmported well graded granular soil could be used to reduce the settlement risk. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.45. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 375 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be a granular soil compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Job No. 110 121 A G1 M FLOOR SLABS The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab - on- grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free - draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on -site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in mountainous areas that Iocal perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free - draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free - draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 Job No. 110 121A Ggtech -7- sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 %2 feet deep. SITE GRADING Excavation for the uphill foundation could be relatively extensive and there would be a risk of construction- induced slope instability. Fills should be limited to about 8 to 10 feet deep, especially at the downhill sides of the duplex where the slope steepens. Embankment fills should be compacted to at Ieast 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation, the existing fill and topsoil and compacting to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density. The fill should be benched into slopes that exceed 20% grade. Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation or other means. The risk of slope Mstafiility wilrbe creased i seepage eepage is encountered in cuts and flatter slopes may be necessary. If seepage is encountered in permanent cuts, an investigation should be conducted to determine if the seepage will adversely affect the cut stability. This office should review site grading plans for the project prior to construction. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the duplex has been completed: 1 } Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in Iandscape areas. Job No. 110121A GAteCh -8- 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free - draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not m;, udedetermining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re- evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations Job No. 110121A GeMech presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engmeer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH 7 PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Louis E. Eller - Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlal LEE/ksw cc: Berglund Architectis Berglund ( hans aberglundarchitects.com -- Michael -LrSanner- rchitect -PC- – Attrn- Michael Sanner - -_ - ( sanner.architectsaa yahoo com Job No. 110 121 A Gg&ec Y APPROXIMATE SCALE 1 " = w l BENCH MARK: TOP OF DECK PAVERS; ELEV. = 8278.0, AS O co LOT r PROPOSED ALLEN DUPLEX BORING 1 w cr J PROPOSED C C STR 0 DUPLEX AO UPLEX EXISTING • D UPLEX UPLEX BORING 2 Y, BUILD, 8270 LOT 1 8280 110 121A I C�` �� I LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS I Figure 1 BORING 1 BORING 2 WEST UNIT EAST UNIT ELEV.= 8278.1' ELEV.= 8278.T 8280 8275 8270 u. 8285 8260 8255 7/12 9/12 WC =11.1 DD= 122 - 200 =23 5/12 13/12 •:'� 9/12 WC =19.2 DD =104 WC =13.5 DD =111 • ;t 33/12 =. • 35/12 15/12 8250 8280 8275 8270 8265 8260 8255 8250 Note. Explanation of symbols Is shown on Figure 3. H 110 121A LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 2 LEGEND: ® FILL; silty sand and clay, some gravel and cobbles, medium stiff /loose, moist, dark brown. H SAND AND CLAY (SC -CL); silty, scattered gravel, medium dense /stiff, moist, brown. a SAND, GRAVEL AND COBBLES (SC -GC); clayey, probable boulders, medium dense, slightly moist, brown, subangular rocks. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2 -inch I.D. California liner sample. 7/12 Drive sample blow count; Indicates that 7 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 Inches were required to drive the California sampler 12 Inches. T Practical drilling refusal. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on May 20, 2010 with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were measured by instrument level and refer to the Bench Mark shown on Figure 1. lie exptora ory boring loations and elevations §ho Td be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked i day later. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pcf) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 110 121A I C'` ! I I LEGEND AND NOTES I Figure 3 Moisture Content = 13.5 percent Dry Density = 111 pcf Sample of: Clayey Sand with Gravel From: Boring 1 at 15 Feet M 1 2 c O 3 Q. E 0 V 4 M 1 2 3 0 CD 2 M 4 E 0 U 4" N. No movement upon wetting percent pcf 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.1 1.0 10 p� APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf 110 121A G��Ich I SWELL - CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS No movement upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf Moisture Content = 19.2 Dry Density = 104 Sample of: Sandy Clay with Gravel From: Boring 2 at 10 Feet ce 100 Figure 4 i i HEPWORTH -PAWLA K GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE � Job No. 110 121A SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS NO 200 UNCONFINED STRENGTH Clayey Sand and Gravel - Fill 5 Sandy Clay with Gravel C C 01-18-2013 Inspection Request Reporting Page 1 4:33 pm Vail, CO - City Of Requested Inspect Date: Monday,January 21,2013 Inspection Area: CG Site Address: 925 FAIRWAY DR VAIL WEST SIDE A/P/D Information Activity B10-0164 Type: B-BLD Sub Type: NDUP Status: ISSUED Const Type 102 Occupancy: Use: VB Insp Area: CG Owner ALLEN, LARRY M. &LORI L. Contractor: HILL CONSTRUCTION INC Phone: 328-2200 Description: NEW DWELLING UNIT FOR TWO-FAMILY DWELLING Reauested Inspection(s) Item 540 BLDG-Final C/O Requested Time: 04:00 PM Requestor HILL CONSTRUCTION INC Phone: 328-2200 Comments FOLLOW UP Assigned To JMONDR •N / Entered By: JMONDRAGON K Action ;. Time Exp: Comment ' urn sing ?: ech to be completed planning an public works to be completed provide spe al inspection reports provide address numbers caulk all exterior penitrations rAli mitt` Inspection History Item: 501 PW-Access/Staging/Erosion **Approved** 06/27/12 Inspector: Is Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING **Approved** 11/03/10 Inspector: JRM Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: PARTIAL FOOTING SOUTH WEST NOT READY DUE TO DIRT STORAGE.. SOILS REPORT REC';D ADDED TO FILE 12/13/10 Inspector: JRM Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: APPROVED WEST SIDE FOOTING 04/08/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: top cap at main level SW fire place 04/08/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: DN DENIED Comment: Exterior SW fireplace CMU missing horizontal reinforcement at 16" 08/29/11 Inspector: sg Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: APPROVED ENTRY FOOTER WEST SIDE 03/01/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item 504 PW-Retaining Wall Layout Item 502 PW-Rough IJriveway Grade Item 20 BLDG-Foundation/Steel **Approved** 11/10/10 Inspector: Martin Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: All exterior walls except stairs and grage walls Missing required horizontal bars at arage 11/12/10 Inspector: CG Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: FOUNDATION WALL AT GARAGE SOUTH WALL 12/15/10 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL Comment: wall at west deck and floor w/detail 17 s7 need round report for welds at floor section with steel 03/07/11 Inspector: JRM Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: APPROVED FIRST 8 FT LIFT ON NORTH CMU FIRE PLACE CHASE 03/10/11 Inspector: JRM Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: STRUCTURAL SLAB AT CMU FIREPLACE NORTH SIDE THRU 1ST FLOOR LEVEL ONLY 03/11/11 Inspector: JRM Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL Comment: 2ND CMU LIFT OF NORTH SIDE FIREPLACE CHIMMNEY 03/23/11 Inspector: JRM Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION REPT131 Run Id: 15052