The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDRB070244 , �,�,� ,/! � � ' /� ,�,G Design FteWiew Baard ry��m, v� . ACTION FO�iM � �� Department of Community Developmen� ��j Jj�� 75 South Frontage Road, Vaif, Colorado 8ib�7 rl� t� tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 c�n*.�.�rr�n cE��rrr web. www.vaifgav.cam Project Name: MANOR VAIL LANDSCAPE CHANGE DRB Number: DR6070244 Project Description: FINAL APPROVAL FOR A CHANGE TO THE APPROVED PLANS TO CHANGE LANDSCAPING AT THE ENTRY TO MANOR VAIL Participants: OWNER MV PENTHOUSES, LLC. A DELAWA06/05/2007 PO DRAWER 2770 AVON CO 81620 APPLICANT MV PENTHOUSES, LLC. A DELAWA06/05/2007 PO DRAWER 2770 AVON CO 81620 Project Address: 595 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL Location: 595 E VAIL VALLEY DR MANOR VAIL Legal Description: Lot: ABC Block: Subdivision: Vail Village Filing 7 Parcel Number: 2101-081-0200-1 Comments: SEE CONDITIONS BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Action: STAFFAPR Second By: Vote: Date of Approval: 06/20/2007 Conditions: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become vatid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: 202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Planner: Warren Campbell DRB Fee Paid: $20.00 • �• Chan es To Th `�' �_ g e Approved Plans Application for Design Review � i. Department of Community Development � �y1�u� tT,�t� , 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 !U�►1�T�F 1'.�.L' tel: 970.479.2128 fax: 970.479.2452 O web: www.vailgov.com General Information: v All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please � refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review � cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within � one year of the approval. Description ofthe Request: C�,w�g� "� �� Sc�►.n,o ��4 ,��o..� a...�-- � � � � t'1a�e� Vo...�1,., Location of the Proposal: LotR'�'GBlock: Subdivision: vc..L v�U.aae 7 Physical Address: 5 ' r�2- . Parcel No.: �-�� ( U� �C�Z�U�(Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoning: ,� �� 1rJ� 1 Name(s) of Owner(s): t•t�! (�c.��-1,�►�SeS L.l-� Mailing Address: c' r t7 N � l Phone• D v ffo owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant: S LL Mailing Address: l3oy� 2,�;� ��--VvN Lo �5�6�-� Phone: S�o 3So �D/g E-mail Address: �,��,�ws�o�•O�w�o.�e['s.�.l"�Fax: 57c� � 8�(5-?2d5 Type of Review and Fee: � Changes to Approved Plans $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. Submittal Requirements: 3 Sets of Plans Addressing Project Changes Signature of Homeowner(s) or Association �JUN ��b� For O�ffice Use Only: f1 _ .( �L/_ Fee Paid: '��S Check No.: By:_ V C� �� L Meeting Date: ` � � � �� DRB No.: �.J��v� � `� Planner: � Project No.: — v �� F:\cdev\FORMS\Permits\Planning\DRB\drb_change_to_approved�lans_1�age_05-11-2006.doc � i. - - t JOINT PROPERTY OWNER '��' � WRITTEN APPROVAL LETTER , I, (print name) - C ' �� , a joint owner of property located at 3 t s Fi�►�►T v►4 C rA4�-I�c.� 1J1(L• , provide this letter as written approval of the plans dated Ju�- � 2�7 which have been submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for the proposed improvements to be completed at the address noted above. I understand that the proposed improvements include: � ��,.� - „ , / � �� - - �� (Sign e) (Da e) Additionally, please check the statement below which is most applicable to you: O I unde�stand that minor modifications may be made to the plans over the course of the �eview p�ocess to ensure compliance with the Town's applicable codes and regulations. (Initial here) � I request that all modifications, minor or otherwise, which are made to the plans over the course of the review process, be b�ought to my attention by the app/icant for additional approval before undergoing further review by the Town. (Initial here) ******************************************************************************************** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement ******************************************************************************************** Statement Number: R070000878 Amount: $20.00 06/05/200707:51 AM Payment Method: Cash Init: JS Notation: $/MV PENTHOUSES LLC ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: DRB070244 Type: DRB-Chg to Appr Plans Parcel No: 2101-081-0200-1 Site Address: 595 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL Location: 595 E VAIL VALLEY DR MANOR VAIL Total Fees: $20.00 This Payment: $20.00 Total ALL Pmts: $20.00 Balance: $0.00 ******************************************************************************************** ACCOLJNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------------- ------------------------------ ------------ DR 00100003112200 DESIGN REVIEW FEES 20.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- �� 10�. 3 - �recisi n �ee -1�Y01'�S, I11C. P.O. Box 606 •�ai� Colorado 81658 • (970J 926-3594 September 11, 2006 Mr. Kirk Johnston East West Partners 100 East Thomas Place P.O. Drawer 2770 Avon, CO 81620 Re: Preliminary Manor Vail Tree Inventory Dear Kirk, Between 8-16-06 and 8-22-06, I made three site visits to Manor Vail. During this time, I have completed a cursory inspection of the entire site, initiated a tree inventory for significant trees at the main entrance, and evaluated potential impacts to the entrance cottonwoods. This report will address the details of my findings, and provide a set of general guidelines for tree preservation. Tree inventory The first groups of trees inventoried are located primarily on a peninsula extending from the main entrance door westerly towards the tennis courts. A total of 21 trees have been inventoried to date. For locations on the blueprint see [Attachment A, Initial Tree Map]. For details of diameter and drip radius see [Attachment B, Initial Tree Inventory]. Shoring wail & well column impacts The cottonwoods located at the south edge of the proposed parking garage will incur a fair amount of root loss, but the greatest impact will be the loss of branches to accommodate the drilling rig boom. To mitigate branch loss impacts cottonwoods# 5 and# 11, Brad Perry(RA Nelson)has relocated two wells a few feet to the east. In addition, a tree service company will need to prune a pie- shaped opening in the north canopy of 7 cottonwoods. Entrance road impacts Cottonwoods # 1 through#3 will need minor pruning of the bottom 13 feet of branches to accommodate delivery trucks. Cottonwoods#7 through#9 will need more substantial pruning of the lower south side branches. I recommend the existing curb be maintained as the limit-of-disturbance. If the design necessitates more road width, I suggest either removing these three cottonwoods or shifting the road towards the building by instead removing the (6) 5"to 8" small weak cottonwoods adjacent to the building. � . S _ �CA "M%• . � n,,en�,s�rc Mark Stelle� Mr. Kirk Johnston, East West Partners . �recision Manor Vail Project �e,e September 11, 2006 "rVorks, Inc. Tennis court spruces Spruces #15, through#17, allegedly owned by the Town of Vail, are all in extremely poor condition due to years of needle scale insect attack and neglect. All three large spruces exhibit from 30%to 60% defoliation due to this insect. In addition, the center tree(#16) has an extensive open vertical seam that extends from a 3-ft height up through the majority of the upper trunk. I recommend that all three spruces be removed, and more prudent care be given to any replacement trees. General health of cottonwoods All cottonwood trees in this initial inventory are infected with leaf aphids and trunk slim flux (bacterial infection). Neither of these ailments poses a serious health problem for these trees. However, most cottonwood trees in this initial inventory have, stem-girdling roots, to varying degrees. [See Attachment C, Stem-girdling,Roots]. A cursory root crown inspection on tree#9 proved the presence of stem-girdling roots. The excavated hole at this tree clearly displays multiple stem-girdling roots and noticeable lack of a definitive root collar. The lack of trunk taper at grade is a prime indicator of stem-girdling roots. As such, trees #1 through#9 clearly show symptoms of stem-girdling roots. This tree ailment compromises the structural integrity of a tree. There is a direct relationship between the age of a tree and the increase in risk of tree failure. On an older established tree, there is no cure for stem-girdling roots. Removal is the only safe option. If proposed construction results in the loss of maj or structural support roots, these trees should be removed, since they are already structurally compromised by stem-girdling roots. In the event that proposed construction is cancelled, replacement of these cottonwoods should still be given serious consideration, all due to the failure to recognize and address stem-girdling roots at an early age. General health of spruces All spruces at Manor Vail are infected with needle scale insect. This is a virulent insect that is capable of significantly defoliating conifers and in the worst cases, even killing trees. The optimum window of time to spray in Yr '06 has now passed. However, I strongly recommend that all spruces be sprayed twice in Yr '07, once in late June and once in late July. Page 2 of 3 , Mr. Kirk Johnston, East West Partners Manor Vail Project � �recision September 11, 2006 ree � "�Vorks, Inc. Excavation adjacent to "save" trees All tree preservation fences should be erected before excavation commences. [See Attachment D, Tree Preservation Guidelines]. I recommend that a consulting arborist be present before the excavation adjacent to the dripline of any"save" trees. If you have any questions about this report, please give me a call. Sincerely, Mark Stelle, Registered Consulting Arborist Cc: Brad Perry, RA Nelson Tony Vangalis, RA Nelson Attachment A, Initial Tree Map Attachment B, Initial Tree Inventory Attachment C, Stem-girdling Roots Attachment D, Tree Preservation Guidelines Page 3 of 3 0' ' `yt 1 / . �� -� Attachment A `. : � Initial Tree Map , , ,� �� i � Project: Manor Vail .,.,.��;: � . l . .- � - "�' September 11, 2006 �°:�:;.: _. ' .�1�`�`,� . � ;' `, / #!6 , • :�, � � J �2� , � �z Q �'�.: =;'�`�:�=: �/ ,!�;_ ;';�''_`'' �- _ :�<-_` _=;,,��=_: _ ,,;;,..t .. � :, -�"�� i_.: �� --: .''\`_ # � �;:. �=` --� 1� ,y�-- #/3 �'.'�� ' � �_ � � �. • . ��^��/'� \�\I��, � `� .. �. . . . �.� _ -�-��: �....�, �� . ..� .►�� a..`� . , :� .. �.ty_� . `� -- I, - •�`��_ ,,� � - � , '___ . ,i,��y� ' , ,�_ � : :, . ,� �__„_. � .,�. • — - -- ��/� �.� ' /. \` .' �� ''��-+.� ��`�- . ,�#��.��.�� \ — ��q�:: �� — 6 S \ j'i�\ � :�.' �` / !,\ � � ( �f � 4� � \ \ 9 � g�"`�`� � � ! � � � \ _ / Gq fe � � - _ _ _ / � \ i \ \ / � � � -- � -. . . ��, ��-�. . - ��.�1 �t.�_ .`- �-... � � ' . � , \ :,`;,,. '� :�'-� =;%�:;`r', ' � \ \ . \ � .` ' � _ _ _ � - - .� � � � � ` �_ ` � - � ��:.-� ;.�,�, - — �.._ ,�.,�..; � ,.. �,� ti�`� r=� ._ �� , i� �, �•�, > > '�ti � � �1�� •+ y..� � 7�-.,..r' F y�� S�.._� �\` ` -- �+....1 V..�F tl++ � ;�-- ------ --- `�`��` ..` ��.�� ` _ � - . . � �r�� . ��3 ��`- -=- � �,�j �,a; y� .�: #2 �'� #�„ �� --�'�1�C� �,i�. t f r ,; ..''.�•/- �� r f, -•�� ; T ,1 ;:.�; � �, ,� 'S:;ti�`rL 4i'; � `.�..:i1-.�F��)V ,� -��•J � � � ��ti �`��.. Attachment B Initial Tree Inventory Project: Manor Vail September 11, 2006 TREE # SPECIES DBH Drip Comments (inches) Radius feet) 1 Cottonwood 16" 17' Root collars of#1 through#6 are 28"to 36" from sidewalk. 2 Cottonwood 17" 15' Collar to ro osed well is 12 feet 3 Cottonwood 17" 18' Pro osed north side vertical rune will amount to >30% loss of folia e 4 Cottonwood 17" 17' Si 'ficant runin needed to accommodate drill boom 5 Cottonwood 17" 20' Su gest movin we112.5 feet east to miss major limb 6 Cottonwood 17" 20' Significant runing needed to accommodate drill boom 7 Cottonwood 15" 18' Heav east lean, likel due to stem- irdlin roots 8 Cottonwood 16" 18' Necrotic leaf mar ins 9 Cottonwood 16" 15' Necrotic leaf mar ins. Root crown excavation confirmed stem-girdlin roots 10 Blue spruce 10" 10' Particularly heavy needle scale. Top disfigured by cottonwood branch com etition 11 Cottonwood 24" 20' Root collar is at 2-ft raised lanter bed. Well established root collar 12 Cottonwood 18" 20' Well established root collar 13 Cottonwood 17" 16' Well established root collar 14 Cottonwood 22" 19' Well established root collar 15 Blue s ruce 18" 14' Extreme needle scale 16 Blue s ruce 16" 14' Extreme needle scale. Lon o en vertical trunk seam 17 Blue s ruce 18" 14' Extreme needle scale 18 Blue s ruce 4" 6' Narrow and scrawn 19 Blue s ruce 7" 8' Narrow and scrawn 20 Blue s ruce 9" 8' Heav scale but avera e tree sha e 21 Blue s ruce 5" 6' Scrawn Attachment C � � Project: Manor Vail September 11, 2006 Stem-girdling tree roots Mark Stelle,Registered Consulting Arborist Following a heavy afternoon wind, it is not uncommon for me to receive a call from a frantic homeowner who states "a large landscape tree has fallen against my house". The homeowner often further states "this tree has always appeared healthy but the recent winds easily blew it down". The following story describes a typical scenario of poorly planted tree that evolved into a hazard-tree. Upon inspection, the tree was identified as a 16 inch trunk diameter cottonwood tree. Reportedly, the tree had been planted approximately 12 years earlier. It appeared to have a full, live, vigorous canopy with a rapidly growing upper trunk. "Why did it suddenly blow over, and can it be saved by straightening and guying?" asked the owner. Unfortunately, I had to inform the sad individual that their tree was a total loss. The culprit was stem-girdling roots. Stem-girdling roots are roots that circle around the main trunlc once a tree has been planted too deeply. In this example, the tree exhibited a lower trunk without root flare. Instead of the trunk showing enlargement as it entered the ground, the trunk did not show normal taper and was actually significantly smaller in diameter just below grade. As the continuous increase in girth of circling roots and the growing trunk came in contact, the girdling roots won the battle by being powerful enough to choke the outward expansion of the tree trunk. A trunk that measured 16" diameter at eye level had been limited to only a 6" diameter at the point of restriction caused by the girdling roots. The result was a large tree that exhibited greater leverage than a small restricted base could hold. This is a typical example of how long-term problems originate from a failure to follow standardized industry specifications [ANSI A300 (Part 6) -2005 Transplanting). Section 63.6.2.3 of the standard states "the bottom of the trunk flare shall be at or above finished grade". Although stem-girdling roots do occasionally occur in nature, they are extremely common in planted landscapes. The primary reason for the development of stem-girdling roots is planting trees too deeply. A deeply planted tree not only wrongly positions both the root collar and buttress roots (primary structural roots) significantly below grade,but subsequent addition of fill soil on top of the root ball creates the perfect environment for the development of stem-girdling roots near the surface and root rot lower in the root ball. Since oxygen uptake is essential to root health, buried roots respond by growing towards the surface, particularly towards the oxygen-rich interface between the deeply planted trunk and the excess fill. The result is first a circling, then a girdling orientation, then strangling, and often eventually a windblown tree. Page C2 of C2 � Attachment C Project: Manor Vail September 11, 2006 The earlier story represents the most serious loss, the loss of time. We all want our planted trees to grow vigorously and reach their full potential as permanent landscape features. Planting too deeply violates published industry standards, often results in root rot, and short-term tree losses. However, even if a deeply planted tree survives the initial stress, it is predisposed to stem-girdling roots and premature failure during the prime of its life. To avoid the pitfalls of poorly planted trees, homeowners and contractors are encouraged to retain the services of a qualified consulting arborist for planting stock inspection, planting specification review, and post-planting tree inspections. In addition to inspections for depth of planting, a consultant can provide an audit of irrigation frequency, drip placement and volume requirements, provide a comprehensive assessment of tree health, and supply a suggested program to monitor future tree health. Mark Stelle is a Registered Co�:sulting Arborist. He provides consulting services i�x Colorado a�id California. For further information call(970) 926-3594. Page C2 of C2 Attachment D � Tree Preservation Guidelines Project: Manor Vail By: Mark Stelle, Registered Consulting Arborist September 11, 2006 ROOT ZONE PROTECTION Protection of the critical root zone is essential to insure long-term health and survival of the tree. Soil compaction can be just as damaging as root cutting and root removal. To protect the critical root zone from excavation and compaction, a fence should be erected before the onset of any topsoil removal from the site. The will provide a much needed physical barrier throughout the construction and landscape construction process. This physical barrier protects against adverse impacts such as excavation, trenching, machinery traffic, and attempts to temporarily store building materials. Fencing: An improperly installed tree protection fence is as good as no fence at all. Specifications are as follows: The fence should be installed at the dripline of all save- trees, a minimum of 4' tall, and installed with"T"posts on 4' centers. The fence should remain, undisturbed throughout general construction and initial landscape construction. Fencing Alternative: Should the fence require temporary disassembly for temporary access, a consulting arborist should be contacted to approve alternative trunk/root protection. The trunk can then be protected as specified in the "Trunk Protection" segment of this report. Mulching: If not already mulched, all save-trees should be mulched before initial site excavation. The mulch layer should be 2" to 4"thick and cover the entire critical root zone (from the trunk to the dripline). The material can be wood chips, bark, or straw. Benefits are as follows: • Reduce evaporation of ground moisture. • Reduce eroding effects of supplemental water. • Moderate soil temperature. • Mitigate soil compaction. • Recycle trace amounts of nutrients (only a benefit of organic mulch). Construction Material Storage & Dumping: The critical root zone (area within dripline) should be void of stored materials. In addition, storage (even temporary)of any fueUoil containers, or other chemical contaminants within 20 feet of the dripline of any significant save-tree should be strictly prohibited. Once spilled liquids contaminate the root zone, remedial leaching procedures become extremely expensive and chemical uptake by the root system often results in irreversible tree decline. Page D1 of D4 � Attachment D Tree Preservation Guidelines Project: Manor Vail By: Mark Stelle, Registered Consulting Arborist September 11, 2006 TRUNK & BRANCH PROTECTION All tree trunks that are subject to runaway boulders or scraping from machinery should be encircled with straw bales. The bales should be positioned vertically axound the entire trunk perimeter and tightly bound with twine. Under no circumstances should wire/string encircle the trunk directly against the tree bark. Straw bales will also protect any exposed root collars'. � Where possible all branches adjacent to constant machinery traffic should be identified by the general contractor/excavating contractor and pruned or tied out of harms way by an arborist. The tree inventory identifies several trees on this project that need professional pruning to allow for vehicle access and minimize unwanted branch tearing. EXCAVATI ON When removing topsoil, to the extent possible, all excavation adjacent to the root zone should be cut radially away from the trunk. The operator's machine should always be facing the trunk when the shovel severs the root. This procedure minimizes damage to the residual root system. Exploratory Excavation: This is a procedure for determining the actual location, size, and volume of roots before the excavator operator disturbs topsoil adjacent to the dripline of a significant save-tree. This procedure must be monitored by a consulting arborist. Root pruning: Prior to machine excavation cuts, a pre-excavation hand-dug trench will reveal critical artery roots which can be sawn by hand to minimize damage to the residual root system. Onsite monitoring and root pruning by a consulting arborist is suggested at this point. Any time a soil cut remains exposed to the sun for an extended period, the cut should be covered with a porous protective barrier such as landscape fabric, burlap, or plywood. Tree & Stump Removal: Trees scheduled for removal that located adjacent to the dripline of save-trees should not be toppled by an excavator. Rather, removal-trees located adjacent to save-trees should be felled by an experienced arborist, and the stumps should be sawn flush to the ground or treated with a stump grinder, leaving the stump's root wad2 and adjacent save-tree roots undisturbed. �Root collar(root flare or root crown)-A point at tree base where the roots and trunk merge. Z Root wad-The mass of soil and large structural roots immediately below the trunk. Page D2 of D4 Attachment D � Tree Preservation Guidelines Project: Manor Vail By: Mark Stelle, Registered Consulting Arborist September 11, 2006 Excess Soil Storage: Excess soil should not be stored (even temporarily)within the dripline of any save- tree. The adverse effects of this excess soil are as follows: • Compaction irreparably damages the critical root zone by inhibiting critical gas exchange and water percolation. • Compaction often kills beneficial soil microbes that are associated with root health. • The cleanup process of removing excess soil by machines often introduces further physical damage to surface roots. If temporary placement of fill soil within the dripline of a tree becomes absolutely unavoidable, there are two prudent protective measures. • Encircle the trunk with vertically place straw bales. • Cover entire area inside the dripline with landscape fabric prior to adding fill dirt. Aeration System: If permanently adding extra soil over the root zone becomes an unavoidable option, an adequate aeration system should first be designed and installed under the guidance of a consulting arborist. Once an aeration system and trunk protection has been installed, the excavator may commence with the addition of fill dirt. Soil Retention: Any time a proposed excavation cut and the associated over-cut would violate the dripline, vertical shoring such as soil nailing should be considered. Water Stress Mitigation: A tree on a construction site can become water-stressed from several influences. � Physical root damage or destruction. • Increased exposure from the drying effects of sun upon soil and foliage. • Reduced availability of ground water, due to the wicking effects of an exposed hillside excavation cut. • Soil compaction can adversely affect the availability of rainwater. Supplemental Watering: Supplemental watering of all critical save-trees during this construction project should be scheduled. Prior to initial excavation, a supplemental water source should be secured. If hydrant water is not immediately available on the site prior to construction, a water truck should be scheduled. Page D3 of D4 ' Attachment D Tree Preservation Guidelines Project: Manor Vail By: Mark Stelie, Registered Consulting Arborist September 11, 2006 Water Frequency and Volume: This is a customized program which varies greatly between each tree depending upon size, slope, exposure, and weather patterns of a given month:Specific needs must be monitored by the consulting arborist at the time of initial excavation. SUBCONTRACTOR BIDDING SPECIFICATIONS The roles of a consulting arborist are to review proposed impacts to save-tree candidates, provide guidance, and to monitor(dependant upon the project budget) construction impacts. The creation of tree preservation guidelines is an important step in a tree preservation program. However, the people truly hired to save trees are the contractors and subcontractors who are onsite every day. In addition to denoting on all future site plans the physical location of the tree protection fence, the bidding prospectus for all subcontractors, particularly excavators, should clearly reference the"off limits"tree protection zone. This is absolutely essential since the positioning of the fence limits the size of machinery allowable, the access for backfilling, scaffolding size, and general working space between the structure and the tree dripline. Subcontractors must understand that the tree protection fence must remain unaltered throughout the construction and landscape construction process. Page D4 of D4 ******************************************************************************************** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement ***************************+**************************************************************** Statement Number: R070000878 Amount: $20.00 06/05/200707:51 AM Payment Method: Cash Init: JS Notation: $/MV PENTHOUSES LLC ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: DRB070244 Type: DRB-Chg to Appr Plans Parcel No: 2101-081-0200-1 Site Address: 595 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL Location: 595 E VAIL VALLEY DR MANOR VAIL Total Fees: $20.00 This Payment: $20.00 Total ALL Pmts: $20.00 Balance: $0.00 ******************************************************************************************** ACCOUN"I'ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------------- ------------------------------ ------------ DR 00100003112200 DESIGN REVIEW FEES 20.00