Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
B10-0330
Revision Submittals: 1. "Field Set" of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved & the permit is re- issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are $55.00 per hour (2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. Permit #(s) information applies to: ]11©- -0"330 Attention: Project Street Address: 11 �q� E.ALO►il LIA (Number) (Street) (Suite #) Building /Complex Name: TE,__ 2FS, Contact Information: Company: Company Address: City: Contact Name: Contact Phone: E -Mail Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building: $ Plumbing: Electrical: g Mechanical: Total: State: Zip: (v)'Revisions ( ) Response to Correction Letter _attached copy of correction letter () Deferred Submittal () Other Description / List of Changes: (use additional sheet if necessary) Date Received: (�LC�FEDWC uu OCT 2 2 2010 TOWN OF VAIL 01 -Jan-10 TRANSMITTAL FORM NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES MWWOVK Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 ADD /ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT Permit #: B10 -0330 Project #: PRJ10 -0549 Job Address: 4791 MEADOW LN VAIL Location......: Parcel No....: 210113104005 OWNER BIGHORN 4792 LP 09/28/2010 11118 CRIPPLEGATE POTOMAC MD 20854 APPLICANT NEDBO CONSTRUCTION P.O. BOX 3419 VAIL CO 81658 License: 251 -A CONTRACTOR NEDBO CONSTRUCTION P.O. BOX 3419 VAIL CO 81658 License: 251 -A 09/28/2010 Phone: 970 - 845 -1001 09/28/2010 Phone: 970-845-1001 Description: ONE LEVEL BEDROOM ADDITION OF 152 SQ FT. REMODEL OF TWO INTERIOR BATHROOMS. Status .. : ISSUED Applied ..: 09/28/2010 Issued...: 10/15/2010 Expires ...: 04/13/2011 Occupancy: IRC Valuation: $96,000.00 Type Construction: IRC Total Sq Ft Added: 135 }}}}} Y}}}:}} Y:}} Y}#}}}}} Y}} Y} YY}}} YYYYYY} Y} YY} YYYYYYYYY }YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY FEE SUMMARY •""* YYYYYY} Y} YYYYY} YY}}}}} Y} Y} YY} Y YY}}}}}}}}}}}} } } } }Y } }. } }YYYYYY }YYYYYYYYYYYYYY Building Permit Fee - - - - -> $965.75 Will Cal Fee --------------------- > $4.00 Total Calculated Fees------ - - - - -> $3,337.74 Plan Check------------ - - - - -> $627.74 Use Tax Fee --------------------- > $1,720.00 Additional Fees--------------- - - - - -> $0.00 Add'I Plan Check Hours -> $0.00 Restuarant Plan Review - - - - -> $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES ------- - ---- > $3,337.74 Investigation — -------- — ----- > $0.00 Recreation Fee ---- — ----------- > $20.25 Payments----------- ----- > $3,337.74 Y} Y} YYYY}}}} ;YYY } }Y }YYYYitfeRYYM1rYYYYYYYYV iRYYYYrtYYYYY�41�fffYYf. Total Calculated Fees - - ---- > rtYrrtYetr} Y} Y} y, Yy„ yYYfrYYYYY1tYit�tA' YYYYLYY' $3,337.74 YYYYYtYYYYYYtk} y` Y}} BALANCE DUE----------- ----- > Y}}}}}} Y}} b}}} Y}}}} y` 4A}}}}}}}}}} �M!}} Y4}} qy/. y} } } } } } $0.00 }Yi4 }YY }YY }YYrtfrYYYYYYf DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY -FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM 0 PM.( 1.. gn ure of w r or C tractor / Date Print Name bid_alt_constru ction_pe rm it_041908 APPROVALS Permit #: B10 -0330 as of 10 -15 -2010 Status: ISSUED Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 10/12/2010 cg Action: CR project comments sent to applicant 10/14/2010 cg Action: AP APPROVED REVISIONS Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/01/2010 Warren Action: AP Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 09/28/2010 mvaughan Action: AP fire alarm system alterations shall take place under separate permitting. See the Conditions section of this Document for any that may apply. b I d_a It_co n st ru ct i o n_pe rm i t_041908 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit #: B10 -0330 as of 10 -15 -2010 Status: ISSUED Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 44 (BLDG 2009): (SFR) SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED PER SECTION R314 OF THE 2009 IRC, IF APPLICABLE UNLESS A MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED. Cond: 42 (BLDG 2009) CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED PER 2009 IRC R315 b Id_a It_construction _perm it_041908 ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Statement Number: R100001589 Amount: $3,337.74 10/15/201001:02 PM Payment Method: Check Init: SAB ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notation: 37174 NEDBO Permit No: B10 -0330 Type: ADD /ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT Parcel No: 2101- 131 - 0400 -5 Site Address: 4791 MEADOW LN VAIL Location: Total Fees: $3,337.74 This Payment: $3,337.74 Total ALL Pmts: $3,337.74 Balance: $0.00 ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code -------------- - - - Description Current Pmts - -- BP 00100003111100 ------------------------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- BUILDING PERMIT FEES 965.75 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 627.74 RF 11100003112700 RECREATION FEES 20.25 UT 11000003106000 USE TAX 4% 1,720.00 WC 00100003112800 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 4.00 - - - - -- Department of, Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 ,F. Tel: 970-479 -2128 L * ;# - Fax: 970 -479 -2452 �� Web: www.vailgov.com ey elORmen G i BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Separate permits are required for electrical, plumbing, mechanical, fireplace, etc. Project Street Address: 479Z ln e"'J .w utie_ (Number) (Street) (Suite #) Building /Complex Name: Contractor Information: Company: Nedbo &ns � —'l Company Address: C) &)X, - 3 1 4 19 City: State: w Zip: �51 to�� Contact Name: )����'� K-I Contact Phone: Office Use: Do D' ) ' C a • Building Permit B ID Detailed Scope and Location of Work: � Lf�t � /�c��oo� /�ddi �ir,✓1 � 1 SZ �f Gn l 1 - em -9l Z i n 970- f5 /001 E -Mail c P re"D' c0wt Town of Vail Contractor Registration No.: A ZS, X r� Contractor Signature (requir Property Information Parcel #: Z10t - 13l- 04 _ 00 (For parcel #, contact Eagle County Assessors Office at 970 - 328 -8640 or visit www.eaglecounty.us /patie) Lot #: J Block # - 7 Subdivision: &3 korA S + " � }iM (use additional sheet if necessary) Work Class: New ( ) Addition (X) Remodel ( ) Repair ( ) Other ( ) Work Type Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Both (x ) Type of Building: Single - Family ( ) Duplex (X) Multi - Family ( ) Commercial( ) Other( ) Tenant Name: Does a Fire Alarm Exist? Yes ( ) No( ) Owner Name: l9ij 6rh 4792 L{ ' Monitored Alarm? Yes ( ) No( ) Does a Sprinkler System Exist? Yes ( ) No( ) Valuations (Labor & Materials) Building: $ _70/ ox Plumbing: $ 20t Ow Electrical: $ I"JvcU Mechanical (including Fireplace): # & Type of Existing Fireplaces: Gas Appliances ( ) Gas Log ( ) Wood /Pellet ( ) Wood Burning ( ) # & Type of Proposed Fireplaces: Gas Appliances ( ) Gas Log ( ) Wood /Pellet ( ) Wood Burning ( ) Date Received Total: $ q 4 1 C W-J C: \cdev\ forms \permits \building\residcnti al_bu it ding _permit_010110 SEP 2 2010 TOWN OF VAIL Vail Fire Department Asbestos Testing & Abatement Requirements Asbestos testing and abatement protects workers, homeowners, neighbors and emergency services responders from ex- posure to harmful asbestos. The Town of Vail asbestos abatement program is in addition to the State of Colorado's regu- lations. It is your responsibility to be in compliance with the State. Please contact the State directly for their requirements at the contact info listed below. When is asbestos testing required? ANY building projects disturbing more than these threshold levels of building materials require asbestos testing: One- and Two - Family Dwellings: 30 square feet All Others: 160 square feet Asbestos testing results must be provided with your application for a building permit. Tests which identify POSITIVE results at more than 1% require abatement by a State - certified and Vail- registered abate- ment contractor. An asbestos abatement permit must be approved, and the clearance letter must be submitted to the Town of Vail before the building permit will be issued Project Checklist My project falls into the category checked below: ❑ Will not disturb more than the threshold limits identified above. 0 Tested negative, or at 1% or below (2 copies of test results included) ❑ Tested positive at more than 1 %, requires abatement (2 copies of test results included) Tips & Facts: • Even recent construction projects may include asbestos - containing materials, so buildings of an A age require testing. • The "1989 Ban" on asbestos - containing materials is commonly misunderstood. "In fact, in 1991 the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated much of the so- called "Asbestos Ban and Phaseout" rule and remanded it to the EPA. Thus, much of the original 1989 EPA ban on the U.S. manufacturing, importation, processing, or distribution in commerce of many asbestos - containing product categories was set aside and did not take effect." - CDPHE Asbestos test results and abatement permit applications should be submitted to: Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 S Frontage Rd, Vail, CO, 81657. Town of Vail Contact: David Rhoades, Fire Inspector Vail Fire Department 75 S Frontage Rd drhoades @vailgov.com 970 - 477 -3454 www.vai1Qov.com State of Colorado Contact: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Asbestos Compliance Assistance Group 303 - 692 -3158 asbestos@state.co.us www.cdphe.state.co.us CAcdev\ forms\ permits \building \residential_buiI din g _permit_0101 10 DS Consulting, Inc. Asbestos Inspection and Sampling Report 4792 Meadow Lame, Vail, Colorado 21657 Presented To: Mr. Steve Walker Nedbo Construction 40690 US Hwys 6 & 24 Avon, Colorado 81620 Performed & Prepared By: Mr. Steve Shurtliff DS Consulting, Inc. PO Box 6864 Avon, CO 81620 (303) 378 -1544 Project Details: Project Number: 2794 Conducted: September 16, 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On September 16, 2010, Mr. Steve Shurtliff with DS Consulting, Inc. (DSC) performed a limited asbestos inspection and performed asbestos bulk - sampling at 4792 Meadow Lane, Vail, Colorado, in order to identify potentially hazardous friable and non - friable asbestos - containing materials (ACM) within portions of the ground level of the above - referenced, single - family residence scheduled for renovations. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's (CDPHE) Regulation 8, Part B defines an asbestos - containing material (ACM) as a material containing more than 1% asbestos. Mr. Shurtliff performed asbestos bulk - sampling of two (2) varieties of drywall (surfacing materials) in a total of six (6) locations within the ground level laundry room, kitchenette, bathroom, bedroom and bedroom closet that is to become a bedroom addition as well as a separate bathroom on the ground level that will also be renovated. All six (6) bulk - samples of drywall were analyzed by Aerobiology Laboratory Associates, Inc. (NVLAP #200860 -0) in Denver, Colorado with all six (6) laboratory results reporting as negative for asbestos (see Appendix B for laboratory results). 2 PROJECT OVERVIEW I. Introduction A limited asbestos inspection and bulk - sampling for ACM was conducted at 4792 Meadow Lane, Vail, Colorado, by Mr. Shurtliff on September 16, 2010 at the request of Mr. Steve Walker with Nedbo Construction. Mr. Shurtliff is a Colorado State Certified Building Inspector; having EPA Accreditation #15413 (see Appendix B for certificate). The purpose of the inspection was to identify, sample and assess potentially hazardous friable and non - friable ACM within portions of the ground level of the residence in which renovations are scheduled. II. Structural Design The structure is a wood - framed, multi - level, single - family residence. III. Sampling and Analytical Procedures The inspection, assessment and sampling were conducted by an EPA and AHERA accredited Building Inspector qualified by experience, education and training in the recognition of potential ACM and approved bulk - sampling techniques. The asbestos bulk - sampling was conducted on suspect ACM with a limited number of bulk - samples being collected within the residence. The inspection, assessment and sampling were performed in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency / AHERA recommended procedures. These procedures call for the visual inspection of the area of concern and the collection and analysis of representative bulk - samples of suspect material. Some minor destructive sampling was conducted. Walls, columns and perimeter pipe chases were not broken into in order to locate and quantify suspect ACM. It should be noted that additional ACM might be located in these and other inaccessible areas. Random bulk - samples, representative of the suspect asbestos - containing building materials (ACBM) of each homogeneous area (HA), were collected according to the guidelines published as Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule: Title II of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 USC, Sections 2641 through 2654 and in compliance with 40 CFR, Part 763. Representative sampling is based on the following criteria: 1. The distribution of the suspect material throughout the HA. 2. The suspect material's physical characteristics and application. 3. Random sampling patterns determined for each HA. Suspect materials sampled and analyzed should be considered to be representative of materials in each HA if they exhibit similar physical characteristics and the application of the sampled material can be correlated to the application of un- sampled material. Bulk- samples collected were analyzed utilizing the EPA's Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA 600/R/116, July, 1993) and the McCrone Research Institute's The Asbestos Particle Atlas as methods references. Analysis of the bulk - samples was performed on the "date reported," as listed in the bulk - sample analysis report. 3 IV. Notes on Report Format Suspect materials alike in appearance and application were sampled as HAs. Suspect materials were divided into three classifications: 1. Surfacing Material: sprayed or troweled onto structural building member. 2. Thermal System Insulation (TSI): any type of pipe, boiler, tank, or duct insulation. 3. Miscellaneous Material: other suspect materials, floor tile, sheet vinyl /linoleum, ceiling tiles, insulation, and finishing materials. Condition assessments were performed by the accredited inspector at the time of inspection. Condition assessments are listed in the following section. Ratings of "good," "damaged," and "significantly damaged" are meant to indicate the overall condition of the material. A material in "good" condition has no visible damage or deterioration, or showing only very limited damage or deterioration. A material in "damaged" condition has the following characteristics: The surface is crumbling, blistered, water - stained, gouged, marred or otherwise abraded over less than one -tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed (one - quarter if the damage is localized). Accumulation of powder, dust or debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as confirmatory evidence. A material in "significantly damaged" condition has one or more of the following characteristics: The surface is crumbling or blistered over at least one -tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed (one - quarter if the damage is localized). One -tenth (one - quarter, if localized) of the material is hanging from the surface, deteriorated, or showing adhesive failure. Water stains, gouges, or mars are over at least one -tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed (one - quarter if the damage is localized). Accumulation of powder, dust or debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as confirmatory evidence. Response- action recommendations for asbestos - containing HAs are listed in the section VII. Recommendations may be for more than one HA, if materials are alike. Recommendations are either "general" or "immediate." An immediate recommendation indicates the presence of asbestos greater than 1% within the bulk - sample, or a bulk- sample in the same HA, and should be addressed accordingly. A general recommendation indicates asbestos does not exist greater than 1% within the bulk - sample, or a bulk - sample in the same HA, and no further abatement activities are required for removal of the material. Any sample reporting a "TRACE" amount of asbestos must be considered to be positive for asbestos greater than 1% unless it is analyzed by the point -count method to be less than 1 %. V. Inspector Comments No asbestos - containing material was identified during the bulk - sampling conducted at 4792 Meadow Lane, Vail, Colorado. A total of six (6) bulk- samples were collected from drywall within the ground level of the above - referenced residence. All six (6) bulk - samples tested negative for asbestos. 4 VI. Homogeneous Area Descriptions The following section contains sampled HA descriptions and sample locations. Percent - asbestos content for each sample indicated can vary depending on sample locations, homogeneity of the materials, and type of application. The following samples were collected from the single family residence at 4792 Meadow Lane, Vail, Colorado, on September 16, 2010. The quantities are approximations and are subject to field verification: Homogeneous Area #01 Homogeneous Area #01 Sample #: DW01 -01 Sample #: DW01 -02 Sample Description: Drywall Sample Description: Drywall Sample Location: Ground Level Laundry Room Sample Location: Ground Level Bathroom Wall Wall Wall Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Quantity. <1,000ft Material Quantity: <1,000ft Material Condition: Good Material Condition: Good Layers -Asbestos Content. Layers -Asbestos Content: White tape - Negative White tape - Negative White texture w /tan paint - Negative White texture w /white paint - Negative White joint compound - Negative White joint compound - Negative White texture w /tan paint - Negative White texture w /tan paint - Negative White tan drywall - Negative Recommendations: GENERAL - See Section VII Recommendations: GENERAL - See Section VII Homogeneous Area #01 Homogeneous Area #02 Sample #: DW01 -03 Sample #: DW02 -01 Sample Description: Drywall Sample Description: Drywall Sample Location: Ground Level Bathroom Closet Sample Location: Ground Level Bedroom Wall Wall Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Quantity: <1,000ft Material Quantity: <1,000ft Material Condition: Good Material Condition: Good Layers - Asbestos Content: Layers - Asbestos Content. White tape - Negative White tape - Negative White texture w /white paint - Negative White texture w /white paint - Negative White joint compound - Negative White joint compound - Negative White texture w /tan paint - Negative White /tan drywall - Negative White tan drywall - Negative Recommendations: GENERAL - See Section VII Recommendations: GENERAL - See Section VII Homogeneous Area #02 Homogeneous Area #02 Sample #: DW02 -02 Sample #: DW02 -03 Sample Description: Drywall Sample Description: Drywall Sample Location: Ground Level Bathroom Closet Sample Location: Ground Level Bathroom Closet Wall Wall Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Classification: Surfacing Material Material Quantity: <1,000ft Material Quantity. <1,000ft Material Condition: Good Material Condition: Good Layers - Asbestos Content. Layers -Asbestos Content. White tape - Negative White tape - Negative White joint compound - Negative White texture w /white paint - Negative White texture w /white paint - Negative White joint compound - Negative White tan drywall - Negative White tan drywall - Negative Recommendations: GENERAL - See Section VII Recommendations: GENERAL - See Section VII VII. Recommendations GENERAL: The laboratory results of the potential ACM sampled at 4792 Meadow Lane, Vail, Colorado, indicate that all six (6) bulk - samples of drywall collected were reported as negative for asbestos. Therefore, no professional abatement activities are recommended to remove the above - referenced material. 31 APPENDIX A CERTIFICATION STATE OF COLORADO ASBESTOS CERTIFICATION* Y Colorado Department of Public HeAth and Environment Air Pollution Control Divisiotr r '17tis certifies that r Steve Shurtliff Certification No: 15413 has met the requirements of 25-7 -507, CA-S. and Air Quality Control Commission Regulation No. ; Fart7% and is hereby certified by the state of Colorado in the following discipline , ,. Building Inspector* Issued: 6/1212010 Expires on: 6/12/2011 ,i.' ' 7bu cniJicv r wlid sYh xirb i4e psis, an rjY twnw Uin' vaiemR rnrnt p,' mri /uaer�Y in lkr di+ryJiur ty frd +bo, c ,_ . Y� •s� YA Y� MS '�M � �F �PM. .F. ��'A 8� APPENDIX B LABORATORY ANALYSIS 7 AERObiology LABORATORY ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CONSULTING LABORATORY Certificate of Analysis 13949 W. Colfax Ave Suite 205 Lakewood, CO 80401 303.232.3746 bi www.aeroOlogy.net Client Name Street address DS Consulting, Inc. 5366 Flatrock Ct. W tl W� �Q�Ja Date Collected: Date Received: 09/16/10 09/17/10 City, State ZIP Morrison, CO 80465 �f Date Analyzed: 09/17/10 Attn: Steve Shurlliff NVLAP Lab Code 200860 -0 Date Reported: 09/17/10 Client Project Name: 4792 Meadow Ln. Vail. CO 98% CELL Project ID: 106872 106872 -1B White Texture w/ Tan Paint N Job ID: Negative Test Requested: 3002, Asbestos in Bulk Samples Method: Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM), Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. EPA- 600/R- 93/116, July 1993. Sample Identification Physical Description of Sample; Additional Comments Homo- geneous es /no Number of La ers % Asbestos Detected Non - Asbestos Fibers area % Non - Fibrous Material area % Matrix Material cont osition jr� ~� Client Lab Sample Number DWO1 -01 106872 -1A White Tape N 5,5% Negative 98% CELL 2 NTR = Non - Asbestiform TR NAC = Non - Asbestiform AC FT = Fibrous Talc 106872 -1B White Texture w/ Tan Paint N 5,10% Negative 13949 W. Colfax Ave. Suite 205, 100 C 106872 -1C White Joint Compound N 5,15% Negative 100 C 106872 -1D White Texture w/ Tan Paint N 5,20% Negative 100 G 106872 -1E White /Tan Drywall N 5,50% Negative 15% CELL 85 G DW01 -02 106872 -2A White Tape N 4,20% Negative 98% CELL 2 106872 -2B White Texture w/ White Paint N 4,20% Negative 100 C 106872 -2C White Joint Compound N 4,20% Negative 100 C 106872 -21) White Texture w/ Tan Paint N 4,40% Negative 100 C DW01 -03 106872 -3A White Tape N 5,5% Negative 98% CELL 2 Q = Quartz C = Carbonates V = Vermiculite G = Gypsum M = Mica T =Tar P = Perlite O = Organic B = Binder OP = Opaques D = Diatoms A = Amosite CELL = Cellulose AC = Actinolite MW = Mineral Wool jr� ~� 9�__ _ _ __ �' j "' AN = Anthophyllite CHRY=Chrysotile FBG = Fiberglass SYN = Synthetic CR = Crocidolite WO = Wollastonite Paul Knappe Laboratory Analyst Adam Humphreys Asbestos Laboratory Supervisor TR = Tremolite Trace=Less Than 1% NTR = Non - Asbestiform TR NAC = Non - Asbestiform AC FT = Fibrous Talc AH =Animal Hair Page 1 of 4 13949 W. Colfax Ave. Suite 205, Lakewood CO 80401, 303.232.3746 Q = Quartz C = Carbonates V = Vermiculite G = Gypsum M = Mica T =Tar P = Perlite O = Organic B = Binder OP = Opaques D = Diatoms AEROb o1oc kbQRATORy -�-_ ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CONSULTING LABORATORY Certificate of Analysis 13949 W. Colfax Ave Suite 205 Lakewood, CO 80401 303.232.3746 www.aerobiology.net Client Name Street address DS Consulting, Inc. 5366 Flairock Ct. Date Collected: 09/16/10 Non - Asbestos Fibers area % Non - Fibrous Material area % Matrix Material (composition Date Received: 09/17/10 City, State ZIP Morrison, CO 80465 106872 -3B Date Analyzed: 09/17/10 Attn: Steve Shurtliff NVLAP Lab Code 200860 -0 Date Reported: 09/17/10 Client Project Name: 4792 Meadow Ln. Vail. CO N Project ID: 106872 100 C Job ID: White Texture w/ Tan Paint N 5,15% Negative 100 Test Requested: 3002, Asbestos in Bulk Samples White /Tan Drywall N 5,60% Method: Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM), Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. EPA - 600 /R- 93/116, July 1993. G Sample Identification Physical Description of Sample; Additional Comments Homo- geneous es/no Number of La ers % Asbestos Detected Non - Asbestos Fibers area % Non - Fibrous Material area % Matrix Material (composition CR = Crocidolite Client Lab Sample Number DWO1 -03 106872 -3B White Texture w/ White Paint N 5,10% Negative AH =Animal Hair 100 C 106872 -3C White Joint Compound N 5,10% Negative 100 C 106872 -31) White Texture w/ Tan Paint N 5,15% Negative 100 G 106872 -3E White /Tan Drywall N 5,60% Negative 15% CELL 85 G D W 02 -01 106872 4A White Tape N 4,3% Negative 98% CELL 2 106872 -413 White Texture w/ White Paint N 4,17% Negative 100 C 106872 4C White Joint Compound N 4,25% Negative 100 C 106872 -4D White /Tan Drywall N 4,55% Negative 15% CELL 85 G D W02 -02 106872 -5A White Tape N 4,5% Negative 98% CELL 2 106872 -513 White Joint Compound N 4,10% Negative 100 C Adam Humphreys Asbestos Laboratory Supervisor A = Amosite CELL = Cellulose AC = Actinolite MW = Mineral Wool AN = Anthophyllite FBG = Fiberglass CHRY=Chrysotile SYN = Synthetic CR = Crocidolite WO = Wollastonite TR = Tremolite NTR = Non- Asbestiform TR Trace=Less Than I% NAC = Non- Asbestiform AC FT = Fibrous Talc AH =Animal Hair Q = Quartz C = Carbonates V = Vermiculite G = Gypsum M = Mica T =Tar P = Perlite O = Organic B = Binder OP = Opaques D = Diatoms Paul Knappe Laboratory Analyst Page 2 of 4 13949 W. Colfax Ave. Suite 205, Lakewood CO 80401, 303.232.3746 AERObio1ogy kbORATORy ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CONSULTING LABORATORY Certificate of Analysis 13949 W. Colfax Ave Suite 205 Lakewood, CO 80401 303.232.3746 bi www.aeroOloov net Client Name Street address DS Consulting, Inc. 5366 Flatrock Ct. n (mss Date Collected: 09/16/10 Non - Asbestos Fibers area % Non- Fibrous Material area % � L�J Date Received: 09/17/10 City, State ZIP Morrison, CO 80465 "'�SSS) Date Analyzed: 09/17/10 Attn: Steve Shurtliff NVLAP Lab Code 200860 -0 Date Reported: 09/17/10 Client Project Name: 4792 Meadow Ln. Vail. CO N Project ID: 106872 15% CELL 85 G Job ID: 106872 -6A White Tape N 4,3% Negative 98% CELL Test Requested: 3002, Asbestos in Bulk Samples 106872 -6B White Texture w/ White Paint N Method: Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM), Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. EPA -600/R- 93/116, July 1993. 100 Sample Identification Physical Description of Sample; Additional Comments Homo- geneous es /no Number of La ers % Asbestos Detected Non - Asbestos Fibers area % Non- Fibrous Material area % Matrix Material (composition Client Lab Sample Number D W 02 -02 106872 -5C White Texture w/ White Paint N 4,15% Negative Adam Humphreys 100 C 106872 -51) White /Tan Drywall N 4,70% Negative 15% CELL 85 G D W 02 -03 106872 -6A White Tape N 4,3% Negative 98% CELL 2 106872 -6B White Texture w/ White Paint N 4,7% Negative 100 C 106872 -6C White Joint Compound N 4,10% Negative 100 C 106872 -6D White /Tan Drywall N 4,80% Negative 15% CELL 85 G Q = Quartz C = Carbonates V = Vermiculite G = Gypsum M = Mica T =Tar P = Perlite O = Organic B = Binder OP = Opaques D = Diatoms A = Amosite CELL = Cellulose AC = Actinolite MW = Mineral Wool AN = Anthophyllite FBG = Fiberglass CHRY=Chrysotile CR = Crocidolite SYN = Synthetic WO = Wollastonite Paul Knappe Adam Humphreys TR = Tremolite Trace =Less Than 1% NTR = Non - Asbestiform TR NAC = Non- Asbestiform AC Laboratory Analyst Asbestos Laboratory Supervisor FT = Fibrous Talc AH = Animal Hair Page 3 of 4 13949 W. Colfax Ave. Suite 205, Lakewood CO 80401, 303.232.3746 Q = Quartz C = Carbonates V = Vermiculite G = Gypsum M = Mica T =Tar P = Perlite O = Organic B = Binder OP = Opaques D = Diatoms &RObiology LAbORATORy ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CONSULTING LABORATORY Certificate of Analysis 13949 W. Colfax Ave Suite 205 Lakewood, CO 80401 303.232.3746 www.aerob Consulting, Inc. Date Collected: 09/16/10 53 5366 Flatrock Ct. M V Date Received: \VY A V 09/17/10 Morrison, CO 80465 Date Analyzed: 09/17/10 Steve Shurtliff NVLAP Lab Code 200860 - 0 Date Reported: 09/17/10 Client Project Name: 4792 Meadow Ln. Vail, CO Project ID: 106872 Job ID: General Notes ♦ Negative indicates no asbestos was detected; the method detection limit is 1 %. ♦ Trace or " <1" indicates asbestos was identified in the sample, but the concentration is less than the method detection limit of 1 % • All regulated asbestos minerals (i.e. chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, tremolite, and actinolite) were sought in every layer of each sample, but only those asbestos minerals detected are listed. Amosite is the common name for the asbestiform variety of the minerals cummingtonite and grunterite. Crocidolite is the common name used for the asbestiform variety of the mineral reibekite. • Tile, vinyl, foam, plastic, and fine powder samples may contain asbestos fibers of such small diameter (< 0.25 microns in diameter) that these fibers cannot be detected by PLM. For such samples, more sensitive analytical methods (e.g. TEM, SEM, and XRD) are recommended if greater certainty about asbestos content is required. Semi - quantitative bulk TEM floor the analysis is accepted under the NESHAPS regulations. • These results are submitted pursuant to Aerobiology Laboratory Associates, Inc.'s current terms and conditions of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitation of liability provisions. No responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted. ♦ Unless notified in writing to return the samples covered by this report, Aerobiology Laboratory Associates, Inc. will store the samples for a minimum period of thirty (30) days before discarding. A shipping and handling charge will be assessed for the return of any samples. Notes Required by NVLAP • This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. • This test report relates only to the items tested or calibrated. • This report is not valid unless it bears the name of a NVLAP - approved signatory. ♦ Any reproduction of this document must include the entire document in order for the report to be valid. 13949 W. Colfax Ave. Suite 205, Lakewood CO 80401, 303.232.3746 05/11/2001 10:59 9709269089 LKP ENGINEERING INC PAGE 02 LKP Engineering, Inc. CMUGEOTECWCAL May 11, 2001 Peter and Vivian Peets RE: Opera Hole Observation/Fouzrdation Investigation 11118 Cripplegate Road 4792 Meadow Lane Potomac, MD 20854 East Vail, Eagle County, Colorado Project No. 0164 Attention: Peter and Vivian Peets, At the request, of Jolu1 Carricarte with Morter Aker Cole Architects and at the request of Toni Henderson with Nedbo Construction, on May 10, 2001, we visited the excavation site at 4792 Meadow Lane in East Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, The purpose of our site visit, was to observe the soils exposed in the foundation excavation for the construction of the proposed addition to the existing residence, and provide recommendations for the foundation design. The excavation consisted of one hole between the base of a hillside and the south side of the existing residence. The hole was approximately 20 to 30 by 40 feet in a plats view, with cuts ranging from 8 to 30 feet below the existing grade. The soil exposed at the excavation consisted of weathered to firm shale, siltstone, and sandstone bedrock. Ground water seepage was observed in the excavation. The ground water was seeping through the bedrock layering and it was collecting at the lowest point of the excavation, at the southeast corner of the existing wooden deck. Foundation Recommendations - The proposed addition to the existing residence should be supported with conventional type spread footings, designed for a maxitnuxn allowable soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf. The footings should be placed on the undisturbed bedrock. We recommend minimum width of 16 inches for the continuous footings and 2 feet for the isolated footing pads. Continuous foundation wails should be reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. We recommend a minin of 48 inches of backfill cover for frost protection of the footing subsoils. The foundation excavation should be free from excavation spoils, frost, organics and standing water, Any over excavation within the proposed foundation, should be filled with lean concrete. Foundation walls retaining earth and retaining structures that are laterally supported should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid density of 60 pcf for an "at -rest" condition. Laterally unrestrained structures, retaining the on -site earth, should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid density of 40 pcf for the "active" case. Passive equivalent fluid pressure of 350 pcf can be used and a coefficient for lateral sliding of 0.35. P.O. Box 2837, Edwards, CO 81632, (970) 926 -9088 Tel, (970) 926 -9089 Fax 05/1 10:59 9709259089 LKP ENGINEERING INC PAGE 03 Peter and Vivian Peets Page 2 -0164 May 11, 2001 The above design recommendations assume drained backfill conditions and a horizontal backfill surface. Surcharge loading due to adjacent structures, weight of temporary stored construction materials and equipment, inclined backfill and hydrostatic pressure due to undrained backfill should be incorporated in the design. They should tr to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the retaining wall. Ground water - Ground water dewatering temporary and permanent will be necessary for this site. As an immediate first step, a hole should be excavated at the lowest point of the excavation. In the hole, a perforated barrel :should be installed and surrounded with clean gravel. A sump pump should be installed in the baiTel and the water pumped to the roadside ditch. For the pernnanent drain system, a drain should be installed behind every step in the foundation. All of the drains should be backfilled with clean, crushed rock to above the ground water seepage line, which in this case was to within 2 feet of the existing grade. Detail is attached to this report for the drain system and. the backfill material. The concrete slab should be constructed over a 2 -foot layer of clean gravel consisting of - 3/4 inch gravel with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 3 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. The subgrade for the slab on grade should be graded to a lower, center line, where a perforated, rigid pipe will be installed to collect and remove the water from under the slab on grade area. The underslab gravel could also, be connected with the gravel for the perimeter drain. They should reinforce the concrete slab -on- grade and score control joints according to the American. Concrete Institute requirements and per the recommendations of the designer to reduce damage due to shrinkage. The concrete slab should be separated from the foundation walls and columns with expansion joints to allow for independent movement without causing damage. Grading - The site surrounding the building structure should slope away from the building in all directions. A. minimum of 12 inches in the first 10 feet is recommended in unpaved areas, and three inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. The top of the granular foundation backfill should be covered with a minimum of I foot of relatively impervious fill to reduce the potential of surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoils. Surface water naturally draining toward the proposed building site should be diverted around and away from it by means of drainage swales or other approved methods. The roof drains and downspouts should extend and discharge beyond the limits of the backfill. It is not recommended to introduce excess water to the foundation soils by installing sprinkler systems next to the building. The installation of the sprinkler heads should insure that the spray from the heads will not fall within 10 feet of foundation walls, porches or patio slabs. Lawn ftTigation must be controlled. LKP Engineering, Inc, .4:05/11/2001 10:59 9709269089 LKP ENGINEERING INC PAGE 04 Peter and Vivian Peets Page"-0164 3 May 11, 2001 This report has been prepared according to locally accepted Professional Geotechnical Engineering standards for similar methods of testing and soil condition at this time. The . findings and recommeridation stated above are based an the soil observed in the foundation excavation., There is no other warranty either expressed or implied. Sincerely, p0� REB� LKP NGJNUFE, NG, gj Z 9W26 *Uiza Petrov$'k.a, PE President s '��Q���, s �'� Enclo Copies faxed to Gerda Monroe at Newell Engineers, Inc. at 970-513-7272, John at Morter Aker Cole at 476-0710 Torn at Nedbo Construction at 845-9979 k\Tccomputeflc. myft RPT.wpd LKP Engineering, Inc. a .W LKP Engineering, Inc. .05/11/2001 10:59 `9709259089 i� t LKP ENGINEERING INC CODER SACKF14L WITH ONE FOOT OF RELA TI DEL Y GNP4 SOIL SWAL E 92 " lit FLOOR" SYSTEM _____ -_ /N TfIE r IRST 9p fE!'T GRANULAR FILL Compacted to 90 of the Maximum my Density i n landscaped areas and to 95N under patios or sldewolks \ TN Y[ L, / 91AAI., W77}/ \� PAGE 05 FIL TER F i� GRAVEL DUST EXTEND TO ABOVE THE SEEPAGE L!�!E IIAZL AND PJMan = DRAIN CIVI1,/CgOTECHNICAL 47 92 MCADOw LANE 'n eri T EAST ✓A L gj in C. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Son 1452 Aeon, Co 61420 PN FAR£D FUR; 8 27 -9088 for (970) AP7 -9C60 ,P F T,T',lP LrTTs ;:Woxc NQ 0164 SCAar! N r5 PA ir: 05� 11 -2001 !7awr NII; lit xs LKP ! 1 '3 i�' z s,.i 1 il�•� 4, i. F ' .•�. 5. }; JN 3 U015 TURC . . NE r :, D A ?70,V WA44 ,. ' h' d� F OR f AND NW FO GRANULAR FILL Compacted to 90 of the Maximum my Density i n landscaped areas and to 95N under patios or sldewolks \ TN Y[ L, / 91AAI., W77}/ \� PAGE 05 FIL TER F i� GRAVEL DUST EXTEND TO ABOVE THE SEEPAGE L!�!E IIAZL AND PJMan = DRAIN CIVI1,/CgOTECHNICAL 47 92 MCADOw LANE 'n eri T EAST ✓A L gj in C. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Son 1452 Aeon, Co 61420 PN FAR£D FUR; 8 27 -9088 for (970) AP7 -9C60 ,P F T,T',lP LrTTs ;:Woxc NQ 0164 SCAar! N r5 PA ir: 05� 11 -2001 !7awr NII; lit xs LKP ! 1 GRANULAR FILL Compacted to 90 of the Maximum my Density i n landscaped areas and to 95N under patios or sldewolks \ TN Y[ L, / 91AAI., W77}/ \� PAGE 05 FIL TER F i� GRAVEL DUST EXTEND TO ABOVE THE SEEPAGE L!�!E IIAZL AND PJMan = DRAIN CIVI1,/CgOTECHNICAL 47 92 MCADOw LANE 'n eri T EAST ✓A L gj in C. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Son 1452 Aeon, Co 61420 PN FAR£D FUR; 8 27 -9088 for (970) AP7 -9C60 ,P F T,T',lP LrTTs ;:Woxc NQ 0164 SCAar! N r5 PA ir: 05� 11 -2001 !7awr NII; Department of Community Development 5 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970 - 479 -2138 FAX 970 - 479 -2452 www.vailgov.com PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 10/12/10 TO: Rollie @nedbo.com PERMIT APPLICATION #: PROJECT ADDRESS: OCCUPANCY GROUP: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: NUMBER OF STORIES: BUILDING AREA: B10 -0330 4792 Meadow IRC IRC existing 135 s.f. addition • Submit two complete sets of revised construction documents containing the requested information with all plan revision items clouded or otherwise identified. • Please respond in writing to each comment with a response letter addressing each comment. BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 1 Sheet S1 and S2 must be stamped and signed by the engineer of record - See Attached Plans 2 Revise 1/S2 to show through bolting for side loaded (4) LVL —Shown on plans 3 Revise 4/A2.0 to show minimum R -10 slab edge insulation for a minimum depth of 4' per 2009 IECC table 402.1.1 — See Attached Plans 4 Revise 4/A2.0 to indicate minimum R -49 ceiling insulation per 2009 IECC table 402.1.1 —Noted on Plans 5 Show on plans a minimum of one egress window for bedroom with opening size per IRC R310 —See Attached Plans 6 Indicate on plans for carbon monoxide detectors to be installed throughout existing house per IRC For Mailing: R315 — Noted on Plans PO Box 3419 �. Vail, CO 81658 D For Delivery & Shipping. SCANNED OCT 13 2019 4os90HWY6 &24 SCANNED D ,O2 3 1:gS Eagle -Vail, CO 81620 TOWN O 970- 845 -1001 FAX. 970 - 845 -9979 Vail, Colorado Denver, Colorado Frisco. Colorado October 12, 2010 Monroe & Newell Engineers, Inc. Town of Vail Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Re: Teets Residence Renovation, Permit #1310 -0330, 4792 Meadow Drive, Vail, Eagle County, Colorado (M &N #8320) Gentlemen: We have reviewed the plan review comments from the Town of Vail Community Development Department for the project described above, dated October 12, 2010. The following are our responses to the structural comments: 1. Item 1: Structural construction documents have been stamped and signed by the Engineer of Record for the project. 2. Item 2: Section 1/S2 has been revised to show required bolting of the LVL beam. We believe that the responses above satisfy the structural requirements of the plan review comment letter. If you have any questions or comments, please call. Very truly yours, www. monroe- newell. com 70 Benchmark Road • Suite 204 • P.O. Box 1597 • Avon, Colorado 81620 (970) 949 -7768 • FAX (970) 949 -4054 • email: avon@monroe- newell.com MONROE & NEWELL ENGINEERS, INC. Department of Community Development 5 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970 - 479 -2138 FAX 970 - 479 -2452 www.vailgov.com PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 10/12/10 TO: Rollie @nedbo.com PERMIT APPLICATION #: PROJECT ADDRESS: OCCUPANCY GROUP: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF STORIES: BUILDING AREA: B10 -0330 4792 Meadow IRC IRC existing 135 s.f. addition • Submit complete sets of revised construction documents containing the requested information with all plan revision items clouded or otherwise identified. • Please respond in writing to each comment with a response letter addressing each comment. BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 1 Sheet S1 and S2 must be stamped and signed by the engineer of record - See Attached Plans 2 Revise 1/S2 to show through bolting for side loaded (4) LVL — Shown on plans 3 Revise 4/A2.0 to show minimum R -10 slab edge insulation for a minimum depth of 4' per 2009 IECC table 402.1.1 — See Attached Plans 4 Revise 4/A2.0 to indicate minimum R -49 ceiling insulation per 2009 IECC table 402.1.1 — Noted on Plans 5 Show on plans a minimum of one egress window for bedroom with opening size per IRC R310 — See Attached Plans 6 Indicate on plans for carbon monoxide detectors to be installed throughout existing house per IRC For Mailing: R315 — Noted on Plans PO Box 3419 OCT 13 2010 TOW OF VAtI Vail, CO 81656 For Delivery & Shipping. 40690 HWY 6 & 24 Suite D Eagle -Vail, CO 81620 970 - 845 -1001 FAX. 970- 845 -9979 To � 6 ✓cp. ument of Community ueveiopment 5 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970 - 479 -2138 FAX 970 - 479 -2452 www. vailgov. com PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 10/12/10 TO: Rollie @nedbo.com PERMIT APPLICATION #: PROJECT ADDRESS: OCCUPANCY GROUP: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: NUMBER OF STORIES: BUILDING AREA: B10 -0330 4792 Meadow IRC IRC existing 135 s.f. addition P e ,/ Ij,S�G''L) s v Submit two complete sets of revised construction documents containing the requested information with all plan revision items clouded or otherwise identified • Please respond in writing to each comment with a response letter addressing each comment BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 1 Sheet S1 and S2 must be stamped and signed by the engineer of record 2 Revise 1 /S2 to show through bolting for side loaded (4) LVL 3 Revise 4/A2.0 to show minimum R -10 slab edge insulation for a minimum depth of 4' per 2009 IECC 1% table 402. 1.1 4 Revise 4/A2.0 to indicate minimum R -49 ceiling insulation per 2009 IECC table 402.1.1 l� 5 Show on plans a minimum of one egress window for bedroom with opening size per IRC R310 6 Indicate on plans for carbon monoxide detectors to be installed throughout existing house per IRC R315 Vail, Colorado Denver, Colorado Frisco, Colorado October 12, 2010 Monroe & Newell Engineers, Inc. Town of Vail Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Re: Teets Residence Renovation, Permit #610 -0330, 4792 Meadow Drive, Vail, Eagle County, Colorado (M&N #8320) Gentlemen: We have reviewed the plan review comments from the Town of Vail Community Development Department for the project described above, dated October 12, 2010. The following are our responses to the structural comments: 1. Item 1: Structural construction documents have been stamped and signed by the Engineer of Record for the project. 2. Item 2: Section 1/S2 has been revised to show required bolting of the LVL beam. We believe that the responses above satisfy the structural requirements of the plan review comment letter. If you have any questions or comments, please call. Very truly yours, www.monroe- newell.com 70 Benchmark Road • Suite 204 • P.O. Box 1597 • Avon, Colorado 81620 (970) 949 -7768 • FAX (970) 949 -4054 • email: avon@monroe- newell.com MONROE & NEWELL ENGINEERS, INC. J/ U J L U J L U J LKF Engineering, Inc. CMUGEOTECHNIC/j. May 11, 2001 L.I\r GIVU1IYCCK.L1N0 INU t-Abt bL I� Peter and Vivian, Peets RE: Opera Hole Observation/Foundation Investigation 11118 Cripplegate Road 4792 Meadow Lane Potomac, MD 20854 East Vail, Eagle County, Colorado Project No. 0164 Attention: Peter and Vivian Peets, At the request, of John Carricarte with Morter ,Aker Cole Architects and at the request of Toth Henderson with Nedbo Construction, on May 10, 2001, we visited the excavation site at 4792 Meadow Lane in East Vail, Eagle County, Colorado. The purpose of our site visit, was to observe the soils exposed in the foundation excavation for the construction of the proposed addition to the existing residence, and provide recommendations for the foundation, design. The excavation consisted of one hole between the base of a hillside and the south side of the existing residence. The hole was approximately 20 to 30 by 40 feet in a plan, view, with cuts ranging from 8 to 30 feet below the existing grade. The soil exposed at the excavation consisted of weathered to firm shale, siltstozne, and sandstone bedrock. Ground water seepage was observed in the excavation. The ground water was seeping through the bedrock layering and it was collecting at the lowest point of the excavation, at the southeast corner of the existing wooden deck. Foundation Recommendations - The proposed addition to the existing residence should be supported wilb conventional type spread footings, designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf. The footings should be placed, on the undisturbed bedrock. We recommend minimum width of 16 inches for the continuous footings and 2 feet for the isolated footing pads. Cotntinuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. We recormnend a mininaurn of 48 inches of backfill cover for frost protection of the footing subsoils. The foundation excavation should be free from excavation spoils, frost, organics and standing water. Any over excavation within the proposed foundation, should be filled with lean concrete. Foundation walls retaining earth and retaining structures that are laterally supported should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid density of 60 pcf for an "at -rest" condition. Laterally unrestrained structures, retaining the on -site earth, should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid density of 40 pcf for the "active" case. Passive equivalent fluid pressure of 350 pcf can be used and a coefficient for lateral sliding of 0.35. P.O. Box 2837, Edwards, CO 81632, (970) 926 -9088 Tel, (970) 926 -9089 Fax J7; S1 /ZUrii 1G: J�J 'J /U'JZWJ6b'J LKF' LNUINEENINU INC PAGE 03 Peter and Vivian Peets Page 2-0164 May 11, 2001 The above design recommendations assume drained backfill conditions and a horizontal backfill surface. Surcharge loading due to adjacent structures, weight of temporary stored construction materials and equipment, inclined backfill and hydrostatic pressure due to undrained backfill should be incorporated in the design. They should tty to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the retaining wall. Groundwater - Ground water dewatering temporary and permanent will be necessary for this site. As an immediate first step, a hole should be excavated at the lowest point of the excavation. In the bole, a perforated barrel :should be installed and surrounded with clean gravel. A suznp pump should be installed in the barrel and the water pumped to the roadside ditch. For the permanent drain system, a drain should be installed behind evexy step in the foundation. All of the drains should be backf;lled with clean, crushed rock to above the ground water seepage line, which in this case was to within 2 feet of the existing grade. Detail is attached to this report for the chain system and. the backfill material. The concrete slab should be constructed over a 2 -foot layer of clean gravel consisting of - 3/4 inch gravel with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 3 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. The subgrade for the slab on grade should be graded to a lower, center line, where a perforated, rigid pipe will be installed to collect and remove the water from under the slab on grade area The underslab gravel could also, be connected with the gravel for the perimeter drain. They should reinforce the concrete slab -on -grade and score control joints according to the American Concrete lustitute requirements and per the recommendations of the designer to reduce damage due to shrinkage. The concrete slab should be separated from the foundation walls and columns with expansion joints to allow for independent movement without causing damage. Grading - The site surrounding the building structure should slope away from the building in all directions. A. minimum of 12 inches in th first 10 feet is ;recommended in unpaved areas, and three inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. The top of the granular foundation backfill should be covered with a minimum of 1 foot of relatively impervious fill to reduce the potential of surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoils. Surface water naturally draining toward the proposed building site should be diverted around and away from it by means of drainage swales or other approved methods. The roof drains and downspouts should extend and discharge beyond the limits of the backfill. It is not recommended to introduce excess water to the foundation soils by installing sprinkler systems next to the building. The installation of the sprinkler heads should insure that the spray from the heads will not fall within 10 feet of foundation walls, porches or patio slabs. Lawn irrigation must be controlled. LKP Engineering, Inc. 11/1001 10:59 1 9709269089 LKP ENGINEERING INC Peter and Vivian Peets Page 3 - 0164 May 11, 2001 This report has been prepared according to locally accepted Professional Geotechnical Engineering standards for similar methods of testing and soil conditions at this time. The findings and recommendation stated above are based on the soil conditions observed in the foundation excavation, There is no other warranty either expressed or implied. Sincerely, p0 RE�j� LKPX,NG11N)� RRTNG, _ ! r ""r) �iVlr� g l; 23i Petrov PE President •. C. Enclosure Copies faxed to GErda Monroe at Newell Engineers, Inc,,, at 970 -513 -7272, John at Morter Aker Cole at 476-071 0;: Torn at Nedbo Construction at 845 -9979 \\?ccomputer\r, RMY,Pilc3ly orel doclWPDOC $;0Z64TccOPENfhd.RPT.wpd PAGE 04 3 11/ /6171 16: Old -:j IflyZlbybtiy LKH ENGINEERING INC PAGE 05: t CO iE BACKF14 L WI TH ONE FOOT OF RELATiuELY IMP,"RWOUS SOIL i' SWAL 92 FLOOR SYSTEM -,- - -- /N — _ — — — — — — — - - - -- — — — — — — TERPROOFINC t GRANULAR FILL n•D, Compacted to 90 of the Maximum 4 D Dry Density lR landscoped areas `+ J , and to 95% under patios or sidewalks 2' min } Q FILTER FABRIC n.. a D n e ° COAR$C G AVrt. FI.ODR SY T /4 -tNCy QfAM., iN7j! g ? + LESS T N A F/N£S / r F00 T11VG C D ° - RA l/EL MUST EXTEND u = D TO AR0VC THE IV SEEPAGE LINE SLOP LINOERi i tN ` � I Y ,a lMP£R S MOIS7;IRE TO NE Ic t ` DA TiON WAIL, y _ K 4� 4-INCH - R PERFORA TED PIPE SL OPE A SUI TA BL E OUTL A T 714 " o� OT FOR FL EX /BL E AND A 7' 0 T FOR R1610 PIPE ` 0164 t 7 CIVIL/030TECHNICAL 4792 6I£ADOw 44N£ LKP state ',I ' EAST VAIL NTS jn eri ng . , In 0. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO PA S; x t , PRCRARED FOR; 05 -11 -2 001 i0. Ejox 1452 goon, Co 81520 L f7Cf1RF NQ; 827 - AOEB for 1 970) 0427 -9090 40 TMW .V X IP'i! C , 12 -21 -2010 Inspection Request Reporting Page 10 7:39 am Vail, CO - Citv Of Requested Inspect Date: Tuesday, December 21 2010 Site Address: 4791 MEADOW LN VAIt A/P /D Information Activity: B10 -0330 Type: A -BUILD Sub Type: ADUP Status: ISSUED Const Type: Occupancy: Use: IRC Insp Area: Owner: BIGHORN 4792 LP Contractor: NEDBO CONSTRUCTION Phone: 970 - 845 -1001 Description: ONE LEVEL BEDROOM ADDITION OF 152 SQ FT. REMODEL OF TWO INTERIOR BATHROOMS. h: 90 BLDG -Final >r: NEDBO CONSTR s: Mark 977 -0327 o: JMONDRAGON Requested Time: 01:00 PM Phone: 970 - 845 -1001 -or- 970 -977- 0268 Rollie cell Entered By: SGREMMER1 K Time Exp: Inspection History Item: 10 BLDG - FOOTING "Approved" 10/22/10 Inspector: JRM KActfion:AP E D Comment: Item: 20 BLDG - Foundation /Steel "Approved 10/27/10 Inspector: CG Action: COND APPROVED /CONDITIONS Comment: INSTALL LIFER GROUND PER CODE. MISSED AT FOOTING INSPECTION ADD #5 VERTS AS NOTED NOT TO EXCEED 24" OC ADDRESS DOES NOT MATCH PERMIT Item: 410 Special Inspect - progress rej)t Item: 30 BLDG - Framing * Approved ** 11/24/10 Inspector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 50 BLDG - Insulation ** A proved ** 12/01/10 Inspector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 60 BLDG - Sheetrock Nail ** Approved ** 12/03/10 Inspector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 70 BLDG -Misc. ** Approved ** 12/14/10 Inspector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED Comment: LATHE APPROVED Item: 535 DIA - 30 DAY REMINDER Item: 536 DIA - SITE /LANDSCAPING Item: 420 Special Inspect -final rept Item: 90 BLDG -Final Item: 534 PLAN -FINAL C/O REPT131 Run Id: 12312