The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutB10-0320H �' � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL ^ � � �v � 7 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REPORT Client: Frank Taplin Job No.: 110 044A 1505 Rising Glen Road West Hollywood, California 90069 Project: Taplin Residence, 915 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado Weather: Clear, calm, dry 5620 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax:870-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Day: Tuesday Date: 10/19/10 Page: 9 of 1 Temperature: 45°F at 8:20 am Contractor's Construction Activities: B&Y Drilling was preparing to apply "flash" coat betwesn ground nails #38 and #40, and #44 and #58 (see attachec! nail layout for numbering) at proposed permanent ground nail wall. Equipment in Use: None HP Gaotech's Site Activities: Observed reinforcing steei for second rvw, west wing wall and third row of ground nails at proposed permanent ground nail wall. Verbal Communication: Excavation for the second row, west wing wall and third row of nails, and erection of reinforcing steel had been performed prior to our arrival to the site, but ground nails had not been installed. Nails #38 through #40 were observed to slight[y descend in etevation with the existi�g ground slope. The soils exposed along the cut face consisted of natural granular soils on the east half and weathered to competent bedrock on the west half. We understand that a thin "flash" coat of shotcrete will be applied to the cut face prior to instalting the ground nails in order to prevent ravelling of the cut face. Reinforcing steel observed between nails #38 and #40, and #44 and #58 appeared to be in substantial conformance with the details shown on Sheet 6 of 6 of the design drawings. Nails #41 through #43 are located in the area of the rough graded access ramp into the site and could not be prepared for na91 installation. We informed Terry Bond with Beck Building Company of our observations. disfribution: Beck Building Company — Attn: Terry Bond {terry@beckbui(ds.com) Trevor L. Knelf, P.E. Fie1d Technician 8230--- lnsideComer� --'----�-----^—�--8230 Outside Comer---, _ . _ . 8220 ------- � 1 w • • °— 8210 --- 21 � .W � 41 111 8200 ------- 8190--------- ��Yeh and Associates, Inc. Consulting Geo[echnical Fngineers t 70 Mei Ray Road Glenwaod Sprinr�s, CO 8160 S Phonr: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 ----------8220 B 17 18 79 20 m 1 • • � • � � 37 � � � —8210 ° r— s— — � � 56 57 Q m � • • �j,j -----------82�� -------------------- 8190 NAIL LENGTH SCHEDULE • 20 feet u�;�,ne�c r.: B&cl' Drillinpd 16c. Roj�ci Numha: ziaiss uner EY RDJ U°�c: p+„jca. n�� SeptembeC 23. 2010 RDJ SCALE� HORIZ�NTAL 1' = 10' VQRTICAL 1' = LO' Elevation View Shxl Nun�: Tsplin Rcddeocc q oC6 H� � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECH�lICAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REP�RT Client: Frank Taplin Job No.: 110 044A 1505 Rising Glen Road West Hollywood, California 90069 Project: Taplin Residence, 'i15 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado 5020 County Road 954 Glenwood Springs, CO 81fi01 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Day: Wednesday Date: 9/29/10 Page: 1 of 1 Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: 54°F at 8:10 am Contractor's Constructian Activities: Idle Equipment in Use: None HP Geotech's Site Activities: Observed reinforcing stee{ for first row of ground nails at proposed permanent graund nail wall, building Grid Lines 6, 7 and E. The wall was designed by Yeh and Associates, Inc. and design drawings (Yeh and Associates, Project Number 210-158, dated September 23, 2010) were provided by Beck Building Company for aur use. The wal! will be contructed by B&Y Drilling, Inc. The wall is proposed to have a maximum he[ght of 15 feet. Atotal of 58 nails are proposed to be instafled in 3 rows of 20, 20 and 18, top to bottom, respectively. Excavation for the first raw of nails and erection of reinforcing steel had been performed prior to our arrival to the siie, bu# ground nails had not been instalfecl. The west wing wall portion was not excavated. The soils exposed along the cut face consisted of existing fill and natural granular soils. Existing faotings were observed in the area of nails #9 and #10 (see attached nail layout for numberirtg). Nails #1 through #4 are located in the area of the rough graded access ramp into the siie and were not prepared for nail installation. Nail #18 will be installed with west wing wafl naifs #19 and #20 at a later date. We understand that a thin "flash" coat of shotcrete will be applied to the cut face prior to installing the ground nails in order to prevent ravelling of the cut face. Reinforcement steel observed between nails #5 and #17 appeared to be in substantial conformance with the details shown on Sheet 6 of 6 of ihe design drawings wiih the following exceptions noted below. 1. Wefcled wire fabric was partia(ly erected around the existing foo#ings which protruded out from the excavated face and rebar was not observed at nails #9 and #10. 2. Vertical bars consisted af IVo. 4 rebar spaced at approximately 4 1/2" o.c. The grade of the rebar is not known. cont... 3. Horizontal walers consisted of No. 4 rebar spaced at approximately 4 912" o.c. The grade of the rebar is not known. No splice overlap was specifed on the design drawings, but typically measured between 27 and 29 inches in length. Verbal Communication: We informed Terry Bond with Beck Building Company of our observations and deviations from the design drawings noted above. Ttte ground nail wall engineer of recorc! {Richard Johnson with Yeh and Associates} accepted the rebar spacing as constructed verbally in a telephone conversation conducted in the job trailer while on-site. The engineer also verified #hat the "f[ash" coat application was a typical construction technique and was acceptable at this site. The engineer was not aware of the rebar size discrepancy and stated that he woutd investigate the matter. Mr. Bond informed us the earthwork contractor would be on- site later in the day to sawcut the protruding footing and B&Y wouid complete steel reinforcement erection the following day. He also requested a follow-up site visit to observe the completed work. distribution: Beck Building Company—Attn: Terry 8ond (terry@beckbuilds.com) Trevor L. Knell, P.E. Field Technician 8230----- ------------------ 8230 lnside Comer� Outside Comer� 8220 — — — m a� " ° 8210 — — — � > m w 8200 --- — — — 8220 a� �' c — — — 8210 ° m > m w ---------------------------s2ao 8190----------------------------�---- 8190 NAIL LENGTH SCFiEDULE � 20 feet ��Yeh and Associates, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineus 170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phonr: (970) 384-]500 Fax: (970) 3841501 Dcsi�ml kr BfiY Dr1ll[n�, Inc. Pmjca Nudcr: ziaise [kawr �+Y RDd n'�c Pndca: C�� J Septcmbv 23, 2050 SCALE� HCIRIZONTAL 1' = 10' VERTICAL 1' = 10' Elevation View Shccl Numbm. T¢pUn Realdenee 4 of 6 H� � HEPWORTH-PAWL.AK GEOTECHIVECAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REPORT 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Client: Frank Taplin Job No.: 1'10 044A Day: Friday 1505 Rising Glen Road Date: 10/1110 West Hollywood, California 90069 Page: 1 of 1 Project: Taplin Residence, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: 45°F at 8:30 am Contractor's Construction Activities: B&Y Dril(ing was preparing to apply "flash" coat between ground nails #5 and #17 (see attached nail fayout for numbering) at proposed lower levef, permanent ground nail wali. Equipment in Use: None HP Geotech's Site Activities: Observed completed reinforcing steel erection at first row of ground nails as a foflow-up to aur 9129110 site visit. Reinforcing steel observed between ground nails #5 and #17 appeared to be in subs#antial conformance with the details shown on Sheet 6 of 6 of the design drawings. Rebar sizing had been corrected from No. 4 to No. 5 since our 9/29/10 site visit. Application of the "flash" coat wifl be per#ormed later today. Verbal Communication: We informed Terry Bond with Beck Building Company of our observations. distribution: Beck Building Company—Attn: Terry Bond {terry@beckbuilds.com) Trevor L. Knell, P.E. Field Technician 8230------�— Incir�n('n.ne ` --�--"--�------ 8220 — — — — ,-. �i ' � � c � 8210 — — — > a� W — — — 8230 — — — 8220 m m c ----8210 ° m > m `w 6200 ----------------------------------8200 8990--------------- ��Yeh and Associates, Tnc. Cqnsulting Geotcchnical Engineers 170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phonr: (970) 384I500 Fax: (970) 384-I501 , . _ � m : -n t�°�,. , -��: .��,.... � . _ w. � ------------------ 8190 NAIL LENGTH SCHEDULE • 20 feet SGALE: HORIZONTAL 1' _ (0' VERTICAL L' = LO' n�a r,�: ss�v nr�iu.�, �o� ►,�,�N�„�,� Blevation View ziaisa IklNTIy; R� �a �O�' ShceLNun6a: n,�� M, Sepiember 23, 2010 Tapli� Rpldence 4� 6 RDJ �� HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REPQRT Client: Frank Taplin Job No.: 110 044A 1505 Rising Glen Road West Hollywood, California 90069 Project Taplin Residence, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81641 Phon e: 970-945-7988 Faz: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Day: Tuesday Date: 't 0/5110 Page: 1 of 1 Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: 68°F at 91:OQ am Contractor's Construction Activities: B&Y Drilling installed ground nails #7 through #17 and a test nail (see attached nail layout for numbering). Equipment in Use: BD 700E air-track drill rig, grout plan#, air compressor HP Geotech's Site Activities: �bserved installation of ground naifs #7 through #17 and a test nail between nails #12 and #13. Grout tubes were attached to the bars with duct tape. Grout consisted of Quikrete Type IIII pfaced in drill holes after inserting prepared bars. Nails were installed in substantial accordance with the design drawings (Yeh & Associates, dated 9/23/90), provided. Verbal Communication: We informed Terry Bond with Beck Building Company of our observations. distribution: Beck Suitding Company—Attn: Terry Bored {terry@beckbuilds.com} Louis Eller, SET Field Technician 8230-----�-- Inside Camer� — � — � Outside Comer� 8220 — .: a� w c � 82�d — m > a� w —,.—,�^�------ 8230 ��-�� n,-�c.,� 8200 — — — �— — — 8190------,. — — � — — — — — 8220 s n ts is zo � 1 • � • • � c �' s~ ---82i0 ° m > � • • °' w ------------------------8200 ---------------------- 8190 NAIL LENGTH SCHEDULE • 20 feet ��Yeh and Associates Inc Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 8i601 Phone: (970) 3841500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1' = 10' VERTICAL 1' = k0' n�� r.� BdcY Drllliag, Iue. P�;«�N�«: Elevation View :ioasa o�,.,� nY RDJ �0' Projcce SnxvNumbv: ��,. Sepiember23,2(110 T�plioAesidcnce 1of6 RDJ H� � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REPORT 5020 County Road 954 Glsnwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Client; Frank Taplin Job No.: 110 044A Day: Friday 1505 Rising Glen Road Date: 10/8/10 West Hollywood, California 90069 Page: 1 of 1 Pr4ject: iapfin Resictence, 915 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: 65°F at '12:30 pm Contractor's Construction Activities: B&Y Drilling was preparing to apply "flash" coat between ground nails #18 and #20, and #26 and #37 (see attached naif layout for numbering) at proposed permanent ground nail wall. Equipment in Use: None HP Geotech's Sife Activities: Observed reinforcing steel for first row, west wing waf! and second row of ground nails at proposed permanent ground nail wall. Verbal Communication: Excavation for the first row, west wing wall and second row of nails and ereciion of reinforcing steel had been performed prior to our arrival to the site, but ground nails had not been installed. Nails #18 through #20 were observed to descend in elevation with the existing ground slope. The soils exposed along the cut face consisted mainly of natural granular soils with weathered bedrock near the bottom of the cut face at the west side. We understand that a thin "flash" coat of shotcrete will be applied to the cut face prior to installing the ground naifs in order to prevent raveUing of the cut face. Reinfqrcing steel observed between nails #'(8 and #20, and #2fi and #37 appeared to be in substantial conformance with #he details shown on Sheet 6 of 6 of the design drawings. Nails #21 through #25 are located in the area of the rough graded access ramp into the site and could not be prepared for nai) installation. Nails #38 through #40 will be instafled with the third row of nails. We informed Terry Bond (via telephone) with Beck Building Company of our observations. distribution: 8eck Bui[ding Company — Attn: 7erry Bond {terry@beckbuilds.com) Trevor L. Knell, P.E. 8230--------------- InsideComer --�"--`---------- 8230 Outside Corner� � e+an n..��.,� 8220 ---------- � I 3 4 v • • • • • 21 y� � � � sz�o ---- —72 � � 25 > � � w . . . . 8200 ---------- �------8220 17 18 19 ?A � • • � • Q� � �'° �—`$2�a � � > • � °' w —`----8200 8190 ---------------- ��Yeh and Associates, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 170 tr1el Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phonr: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 , Na � r�.,�_m � ��°+,�w�^;,,,,�_-_ °�, � ��.w . w,._ ------------- 8190 NAIL LENGTH SCHEDULE • 20 feef SCALE� HOR[ZONTAL L' = LO' VERT[CAL 1' _ !0' Dai�ywl Pcr. B&Y DAIIIp�, Inc. �*+�•: Elevation View ziaisa w..m hy: RDd uaie: r`°�oc'r sn�MN�n,e�r. �� ,. Sepiember 23, 2010 T�plin Ruidmtt 4 of 6 RDJ � � � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTlON ACTIVITY REPORT Client: Frank Taplin 1505 Rising Glen Road West Hoilywoad, California 90069 5020 County Road 154 Gfenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 870-845-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No.: 110 Q44A Day: Monday Date: 10191l10 Page: 1 of 9 Project: Taplin Residence, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: 58°F at 11:00 am Contractor's Construction Activities Equipmenf in Use: B&Y Drilling insialled ground nails #5, #6, #18 through #20 and #26 through #37 (see attached nail layout for numbering). BD 700E air-irack drill rig, grout plant, air compressor HP Geotech's Site Activities: Observed installation of ground nails #5, #6, #18 through #20 and #26 through #37. Grout tubes were attached to the bars with duct Eape. Grout consisted of Quikrete Type I/fl placed in drill holes after inserting prepared bars. A bar was not be placed at nail #27 because of contact with nail #26. Naifs were installed in substantial accordance with the design drawings (Yeh 8, Associates, dated 9/23/1Q), provided. Verbal Communication: None distribution: BecEc 8utlding Company — Attn: Terry 8ond (terry@beckbuilds.comj Louis Eller, SE7 Field Technician $230------ [nside Comer � ' — — — —' — ' — ' � — — — 8230 Outside Comer Strip Drains 8220 ---------- -- -------- --------8220 w � � 3 9 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 � v • � • • � � � • � � � ♦ � • • ♦ • • • � � $2 � d--� -- 21 � 23 24 � 26 27 a 29❑ ❑90 31 32 33 3q � �7 3g � C �p � � �� __82�� N 41 42 43 � 45 46 7 48 99 O 51 52 53 � O O y7 O � w ' • • • • • � • • • . • • • • • • w 8200 --------------------------- ------8200 8190 ------------------ ---------------8990 NAIL LENGTH SCHEDULE • 20 feet ��Yeh and Associates. Inc. Consut[ing Geotcchnical Fngineers 170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phane: (970) 384-] S00 Fax: (970) 3841501 SCALE� HORIZONTAL 1' = LO' VERTICAL I' = Lp' :CCl�CV1SIOII Deaq;m+IF�r. k..;,;,.�,� �ad6r B&Y Drilling, Ioc. ProjcctNumlrcr. Elevation View ziaiss �� RDJ � Projon: Shat N�h�r, �y�� Scptember 23.2010 Taplin Ro+�Mcrrce 4 of 6 RD.t NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES .� �ow�o�vn� ' Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT Permit #: B10-0320 Job Address: 115 FOREST RD VAIL Location......: 115 FOREST ROAD Parcei No....: 210107113030 OWNER 115 COMPANY 09/24/2010 4960 S LAFAYETfE LN ENGLEWOOD CO 80113 APPLICANT BECK BUILDING COMPANY P.O. BOX 4030 VAIL CO 81658 License: 117-A CONTRACTOR BECK BUILDING COMPANY P.O. BOX 4030 VAIL CO 81658 License: 117-A 09/24/2010 Phone:970-949-1800 09/24/2010 Phone:970-949-1800 Description: GRADING PERMIT AND SHOTCRETE WALL FOR NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Occupancy: R3 Single Family Residence Type Construction:VB Project #: Valuation: Total Sq Ft Added: Status . . : Applied . . : Issued . .. : Expires . ..: PRJ10-0195 ISSUED 09/24/2010 10/01/2010 03/30/2011 $54, 000.00 0 ..............«....�..,..........,......._.._.......,...,,......,.,.....,....._.= FEE SUMMARY ......_,_,,.,,.,....,...,,.............._,,..,..,...,.......................__.. Building Permit Fee-----> $671.75 Will Cal Fee---------------------> $4.00 Total Calculated Fees-----------> $1,992.39 Plan Check-----------------> $436.64 Use Tax Fee--------------------> $880.00 Additional Fees---------------------> $0.00 Add'I Plan Check Hours-> $0.00 Restuarant Plan Review----> $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES-----------> a1,992.39 Investigation-----------------> $0.00 Recreation Fee----------------> $0.00 Payments-------------------------> a1,992.39 Total Calculated Fees--------> $1,992.39 BALANCE DUE------------------------> �0.00 ............................... ..._.,.......,,..........,,,..............,,.,.,...,....»,,.,,......,................,.,..........,....,........_•___......,,...........,,..............,. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM. d�Uc (3UIl.DtN(� � 2� /�•/•(O . Signat wner or Contractor Date %t/Z�vr C . 130 �� Print Name b Id_a It_construction_pe rm it_041908 wk#fXwfY�4i��RRR��fffwwftwY%4/�fRx��ffwfYYf�#ZI+�**��RffNNMwffwYftlf��41f4�ff4t�f�ifkRxtkfNRkwww#�fx#f*f4444ffxxxNwfwfwwf��f4k�l�444x�xfxxx�fwfRfYfwlflf�ififf�fRf�flRfffx��fffffk APPROVALS Permit #: 610-0320 as of 10-01-2010 Status: ISSUED 4tYefY`iF�kf4*+tlk4i4**fRf'f'1ttYYi1'*ki#fRtrff`f'ff'itfifffYrtTY'k'4*#t#444ff4f'fV�trhf V1frtfA'fhfff#4WLi/l*4fefR�}fRYrRR4ffA'ttikY(fdlf#«f#4f'4f##f' V rtA'iRrt4rt'k�k'k4ift4f#�/Y':!#}lfff'ARfrfififitYrtffYetY`ffii4lf#4:t44lt4l41rw Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 09/24/2010 Martin Action: CR 1. Include plans for the shotcrete wall signed by the engineer of record 2. Provide the soils report for the proposed work. 3. All sheets to be sealed by the registrant. 4. Include the valuation of the prosed work on the permit application 5. Show location of erosion control and method to be used, ie silt fencing. 10/01/2010 Martin Action: AP Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 09/29/2010 bgibson Action: AP plans routed to A-1 Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 09/29/2010 csalli Action: PA approval for grading/shotcrete wall submittal. V ttrtM�RertffrtrtflYlYY`rtrtY`ii(44ttR}*441r41r�fM�4trYr1fr1t4V f�k4M�A'i`#i`4�l�fifRR#}}#wftr4lrtrith}rRfrlrinFtrNtrwYlfifrMIItY`Y1nFirtil`4iiffr4#*f}f+txftr��rt#fRR/RfrtA'�FrtYefY`�k4#il+1r+�MLf4itL4�t�4R41rt�+�Vtrf`�fifxlrfilr}f'f'ffffRfrMtrfYff See the Conditions section of this Document for any that may apply. bld_alt_construction_perm it_041908 •4RRfRf��t}xtttkwfwfl#tff4***#f}}fk�4fYrtt�wili4iii44}}xRli�fNNfwwfftY*�wxf�f##*4�i#i�##}44��fti�ktw;kfwwfMwf�tff44iRfi#++i}ffw}leRklwetwrtwwwwwwMYkMf��4Riti+i#f*iffiii�f*!i#�if��f CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit #: 610-0320 as of 10-01-2010 Status: ISSUED �fflr�lrRR�fRRfYYNRY'iYYYYf�F#i!il4klff'frtefAlffriRiRAfY.'kf#*#*444AA�ltr4RRRiRRV VfefYrkiFfYrfA'�k�klt4f*1`*lrfr#i}441r#*4RffrRRV}rkfY'RYrY`rt'4fr###'Rf**#44f1r41rdfdlrR#iRfrt}r*iRftHiFfYikltrfrR'k#'M#tYrifRw'A44fr1ff`##*!!4lrf'ftRR Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 44 (BLDG 2009): (SFR) SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED PER SECTION R314 OF THE 2009 IRC, IF APPLICABLE UNLESS A MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED. Cond: 42 (BLDG 2009) CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED PER 2009 IRC R315 Cond: CON0011645 SPECIAL INPECTION AGREEMNET TO BE REVISED TO INCLUDE SOIL NAILING AND SHOTCRETE WALL. SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED ON THESEITEMS bld_a It_constru ctio n_perm it_041908 ************************************r****�************************************************** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprinted on 10-01-2010 at 13:34:39 ]0/O1/2010 Statement *********+*****+****************+++******.*************�*************************.********** Statement Number: R100001459 Amount: $1,992.39 10/O1/201001:34 PM Payment Method: Check Init: LC Notation: ck # 18992 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B10-0320 Type: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-1303-0 Site Address: 115 FOREST RD VAIL Location: 115 FOREST ROAD Total Fees: $1,992.39 This Payment: $1,992.39 Total ALL Pmts: $1,992.39 Balance: $0.00 ***+*�**�********************+************************************************************** ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------------- ------------------------------ ------------ BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 671.75 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 436.64 UT 11000003106000 USE TAX 4% 880.00 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 4.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Separate permits are required for electrical, plumbing, mechanical, fireplace, etc. Project Street Address: R I S _ �oR�3r �A� (Number) (Street) (Suite #) Building/Complex Name: Contractor Information: Company: 'g � (3Nt�,DtN G GMPaNr Company Address: p. O. QO�C �030 City: V A1 � State: � Zip: a�s� 8 Contact Name: Contact Phone: ( y%8 • i7�j E-Mail �E�Y � $E�.�C iUI L{�,i' • GpM , Town of Vail Contractor Registration No.: . .i:S�.. Contractor i ature (required) � Property Information Parcel #: /ZI O�- 0 7�— �3 -' 0.30 (For parcel #, contact Eagle County Assessors Office at 970-328-8640 or visit www.eaglecounty.us/patie) Tenant Name: 8 t� ZZ. TR•P�,(/J owner Name: �,15 con� PRNY Valuations (Labor & Materials) Building: Plumbing: Electrical: Mechanical: (including fireplace) Total: � ��% ODO . $ $ $ SY o� • �- Office Use: /� C ,� Project #: %�� " � J ( T � DRB #: � Building Permit Lot #: Block Subdivision: • � r� � � Detailed Scope and Location of Work: C?R�F.Driv 6 �L�R.+Mi � �6 f�i oTc/�7� ��(%'u► . ��+�f �ool�c�rrio� �in. Ne.� �o�r� ix m -r (use adddiona s eet if necessary) ��y � . Work Class: New (� Addition ( ) Remodel ( ) Repair ( ) Other ( ) Work Type Interior ( ) Exterior (�(j Both ( ) Type of Building: Single-Family �} Duplex ( ) Multi-Family ( ) Commercial ( ) Other ( Does a Fire Alarm Exist? Yes (}(� No () ;� Monitored Alarm? Yes (x) No () �� u � � Does a Sprinkler System Exist? Yes (� No () ; ;#& Type of Existing Fireplaces: Gas Appliances � Gas Log Wood/Pellet Wood Burning '#& Type of Proposed Fireplaces: Gas Appliances ' Gas Log Wood/Pellet Wood Burning _ _ _ __ _ __ Date Received: 15-May-10 - i � � �ow�roFV� � Job Name: Job Address: Permit No.: SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT (To applicants of proJects requlring Special Inspection or Testing per Section 1701 of the IBC) The owner or his/her representative, on the advice of the design p�ofessional in responsible charge, shall complete, seal, sign and submit a oopy of the 5pecial Inspection Agreement and Structural Tests Scheduled to the Town of Vail for review and approval. Signatures are required on both pages; photocopied or faxed signatures are acceptable. The owner and his/her general contractor, where applicable, shali also adcnowledge the following conditions applicable to Special Inspection Testing: 1. Contractor is responsible for proper notification to the Inspection or Testing agency for items listed.(Page 1) (IBC 1704) 2. Only the testing laboratory should take samples and transport them to their laboratory. 3. Copies of all laboratory reports and inspections are to be sent directly to the Town of Vail by the Testing agency on a weekly basis. 4. Inspection agency to submit names and qualifications of on-site special inspectors to the Town of Vail for review and approval.( Page 2) 5. The special inspector is responsible to immediately notify the Town of Vail Building O�cial in writing of any concems and/or problems encountered. 6. �t is the responsibility of the contractor to review the Town of Vail approved plans for additional inspection or testing requirements that may be noted. A pre-construction conference at the job site is rec;ommended to review special inspection procedures. 7. The special inspector shall use only the Town of Vail approved drawings. 8- All special inspection field reports must be left on site for review by the Town of Vail staff prior to required inspections or re-inspections. BEFORE OCCUPANCY WILL BE GRANTED: The special inspection agency shall submit a signed and sealed statement that all items requiring testing and inspection were fulfilled and reported. Those items not tested and/or inspected shall be noted in this statement. A copy of the statement shall be maintained at the job site for the Building Inspector's review prior to final inspection. Acknowledgement: Owner: Signature Print Name Date Speaallnspec�ion-� N-7 GEdTE Agency: `E---J-,^,�� . �- TREVOR 1,�44�� 4 � Signature Print Name �� Project Arch/Eng: �Signature Print Name Date Contractor: r, � Qp,�,� 9'.10 •/o ' nature Print Name Date �FCk f3ui ca+N4 � . -3- . • • . � � �owxo�v� . SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING SCHEDULE (IBC 1704) Project Name: PeRnit # Owner's Name: Testing Inspection s�y�amre �� — �� '� GEo�N ►� Agency: c �'�.-� � �12.EVOp. �- • I�t�1Eid� Testing Inspection Signature p� N�e ate Hereby certifies that the Testing/lnspection Agency named above has been engaged to perform structural tests and inspections during construction as checked bebw, to satisfy all applicable portions of the Building Code. Prior to final inspection, the Inspection Agency shall submit a statement that all items of designated work pertormed were reported. Any items checked but not tested or inspected will be noted and explained. Whenever any designated items on the list are ready for sampling, testing, or inspection, it shall be the responsibility of the contractor to give timely notioe to the Inspection agency so that the required services may be pertortned. REINFORCING STEEL: Tensile & Bend, one set per heat per tons � Inspection of Placement Inspection of Welding Epoxy MASONRY: Prefim• AccePtance Tests (Masonry Units, Wall Prisms) Subsequent Tests (Mortar, Grout, Field Wall Prisms) Inspection of Placement and Grouting Reinforoing Tests Inspection of Reinforcing Piacement Tendon Tests Inspection of Tendon Placement Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspectian of Concrete Batching Inspection of Panel Attachment 8 Inserts Compression Tests Inspection of StressingJTransfer PILING, CAISSONS, CAPS, TIES: inspection of Reinforcing Placement Inspection of Concrete Placement InspecUon of Concrete Batching Specify other tests, inspections or specia/ instructions nequired. � UNDERPINNiNG: Temporary/permanent Inspedion of Steel Fabricafion InspecUon oi Reinforcing 8, Forms Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspection of Tiebacks SOIL NAILS: Temporary Shoring Permanent Watl STRUCTURAL STEEL: Sample 8 Test (list spec�c members below) Shop Identificabon & Welding Inspection Shop Ultrasonic Inspection Shop Radiography Field Welding Inspection Field Bofting InspecGon Field Ult�asonic Inspection Field Radiography Meta� �edc Welding Inspecdon FIREPROOFING: Inspection 8 Placement SOIL3: �_ Acceptance Tests �_ Moisture-Density Determinadon �_ Field Density Drilied Piers Deep Fou�datlon STRUCTURAL WOOD: tnspection of Fabrication Inspectfon of Truss Jant Fabrication Sample & Test Components inspection of Glu Lam Fabrication SMOKE CONTROL: SPECIAL CASES: SPECIAL INSPECTION: Seismic Resistance Wind Requirements B & DRILLING, INC. Y PROPOSAL (REV2) September 17, 2010 PO Box 1878 Rifle, Colorado 81650 Phone (970) 625-2608 Fax(970)625-1502 SUBMITTED TO: Beck Building Company C/O Matt Hill PO Box 4030 Vail, CO 81658 (970) 949-1800 Office (970) 949-4335 Fax email: matt ,beckbuilds com email: robvn(a�beckbuilds com JOB NAME & ADDRESS: Taplin Residence, 115 Forest Road; Vail, CO We hereby propose the installation of: -1,400 SF of Permanent Soil Nail Shotcrete wall with a max working height of 16' � Unit Unit of Item Price Measure QuantiTy Costs (15 dav construction durationl PSNW $34.37 w/ Max working height of 16' Design Testing Mobilization Total $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $1,500.00 SF LS LS LS 1,400 $48,118.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $1,500.00 $54,018.00 • The above work to be completed in a substantial and workmanlike manner at the provided unit cost pricing. • This proposal must be accepted as provided and delivered to B& Y Drilling, Inc., 30 days from above date, or it shall expire. Pricing is valid for 30 days after the acceptance date of this proposal. After the 30 day period is breached B&Y will be allowed to update it's material pricing. • B& Y Drilling, Inc. is not responsible for costs associated with drilling into ANY utilities. Locating andlor removal of all nearby utilities to be completed by others prior to startup of drilling operation. • Wall layout, alignment, survey, property limit locations, and necessary easements conducive to the work to be provided by Prime Contractor. • Work is assumed to progress as one continuous operation. Down time not due to B& Y Inc. will be billed at hourly rates. • Prime Contractor is to provide all necessary permits and bonds pertaining to the work being conducted. • Equipment for loading, unloading, and placement of materials from the stockpile area to the immediate work area to be provided by others at no cost or backcharge to B& Y Drilling, Inc. • Concrete washout and trash disposal area to be provided by others. H P tE:� HEPVVORTH-P.AWLAK GEOTECHNICaL September 24, 2010 Frank Taplin I505 Rising Glen Road i �, � � �: �; � _ ', - ,,a � � � �� i�� "; �;— — �_ ;� . _ �,�� r , . !: _t ' --, , Los Angeles, California 90069 Job No. 110 044A Subject: Observation of Exploratoiy Pits, Proposed Residence, Lot 30, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado Dear Mr. Taplin: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed exploratory pits at the subject site on September 14, 2010 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. The services were performed in accordance with our Proposal for Geotechnicul Services to you, dated March 3, 2010, Proposal No. 034-10. We previously provided presumptive soil parameters for foundation design in a report dated March 15, 2010 under the above Job Number. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a 4 level structure located on the site in roughly the same location as the existing residence. The lowest (recreation) level floor elevation will be at 8203'-6" and the upper (garagelauto court) elevation will be at 8235'-0". Ground floor at the recreation level will be slab-on-grade and the garage floor will be structural above a combination of crawlspace and basement storage. The auto court and driveway will consist of structural slabs. We understand that the driveway will be elevated above the finished ground surface. Spread footings sized for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf, as recommended in our previous report, will support the proposed structure. A permanent soil nail wall will be constructed at the uphill side of the recreation and living levels, along building grid lines 6 and 7. Subsurface Conditions: At the time of our site visit, the existing residence and foundation had been removed and an access trail and pad had been rough graded on the site. Two exploratory pits were excavated in the proposed building footprint. The subsoils exposed in the south pit (Pit 1) consisted of 7 feet of inedium dense clayey sand and gravel with rock fiagments up to about 18 inches in size overlying weathered to hard claystone shale bedrock down to the pit depth of 9 feet, or about elevation 8208 feet (provided). The subsoils exposed in the west pit (Pit 2) consisted of inediuin dense clayey sand and gravel down to the bottom pit depth of 11 feet, or about elevation 8 t96 feet (provided). Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on samples of the matrix soils taken from the pits, shown on Figure l, indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. The results of a gradation analysis perforined on a sample of the coarse natural granular soils (minus 3 inch i , � , , �, . � � Frank Taplin September 24, 2010 Page 2 fraction} obtainerl from Pit 1 are presented on Figure 2. No free water was encountered in the pits and the soils and bedrock were slightly moist to moist. Recommendations: Considering the conditions exposed in the explaratory pits and the nature of ihe proposed constniction, spread footings ptaced on the vndis#urbed natural granular soil designed for an a]lowable soil bearing pressure of2,500 psf should be adequate for suppart of the proposed foundation. The matrix portion ofthe soils tends io compress under load and there could be sonae post-cor�struct2on d.i�erential settlement of the fouttdation, especially between continuous footings and isolated pads (such as for the elevated driveway), The underlying bedrock is reiatively incompressible and the magnitude of pote�ntial foundation settlement will depend on the depth of soil below the footing and the load on the footing. We can eva.luate the settlement potential when foundation loads have been developed. Faotings beat'ing entirely on bedrock can be sized for an allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. There could be some differential settlement between footings bearing on the natural soils and foatings beari,ng on bedrock. Footings should be a minimunn vvidth of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. All existing fill, topsoil and loose and distwrbed soils and bedrock fragments in footing areas should be removed and the bearing 1evel extended down to the undisturbed natural soils or bedrock. The bearing soils shouId be protected against frost and concrete should not be placed on frozen soils. Extezior footings should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced. top and bottorn to span local anomalies such as by assuming az� unsupported length of at Ieast 12 feet. Foundation wa11s acting as retaining structures up to about 12 feet tall should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for on-site soil as backfill. Cantilevered retaining structures whzch are separate from the zesidence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the fu11 active earth pressur$ condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on ihe basis of an equivalent fluid unit weigl�t of at least 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils or 35 pcf for zmpc�rted crushed screened rock. A perimeter fowndation drain should be provided to pxevent temporazy buildup of hydrostaric pressure behind the uphill foundation and retaining vva]ls, and soil nail walls, and prevent wetting of the lower levels. Structural fill placed within floor slab areas can consist of the on--site predominantly granular soils or suitable imported granular soil (such as road base) compacted ta at least 95% of standaxd Proctar density (SPD) at a znoisture content near optimum. Backfill placed around the structure should be compacted to at least 90°/a SPD and the surface graded to prevent ponding within at least 10 feet ofthe building. The existing retaining wall at the south (uphill} side of the lot should be underpinned if excavation for the new foundations will be performeci within an envelope defined as a line extended down from the edge ofthe footing at I lzorizontai to 1 verticaI. It appears feasible to underpin the existing retaining wa11 conventionaliy by extending the bearing level down to an adec�uate elevation or can be done with micropiles. Job No. 110 044A Ce'ic�rt�Cf'� Frank Taplin September 24, 2010 Page 3 Limitations: The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the exploratory pit excavations and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation influence. This study is based on the assumption that soils beneath the footings have equal or better support than those exposed. The risk of foundation movement may be greater than indicated in this report because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions. In order to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation, drilling would be required, It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH — PA Trevor L. Knell, P Rev. by: DAY TLK/ksw �L ICAL, INC. oQPo�' i:E�/S�F '�,�..��` `� :Q �~ 3846J r: 90 �. Q� 24 -!o .- ��,� � FsS�ONAI �N�\� Attachments Figure 1— Swell-Consolidation Test Results Figure 2— Gradation Test Results cc: Beck Building Company — Attn: Terry Bond (terry an,beckbuilds com) Job No, l 10 044A G�c�tecn ' , Moisture Content = 13.7 percerrt ' ' Dry Density = 114 pcf Sample of: Clayey Sand with Gravel From: Pit 1 at 6 Feet 0 � z 1 ' : : ' O : � i No movement � 2 upon wetting a : � ' ' O , �; ' 3 '�, : , ' ' , , 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf ) 0 � v Z 1 O � � o�[ 2 a � O U 3 0.1 ' , Moisture Content = 16.5 percent , � Dry Density = 111 pcf � -200 = 26 percent ' Sample of: Clayey Sand From: Pit 2 at 10 Feet ! No movement ' upon wetting : 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf ) � 110 044A I C�jeCj'1 I SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS ( FIGURE 1 -=PWO�'H �AWLAK G=�?= �iiNi�L , . � . - .. , �..� - . . �. , �� . � ,, ► � � P . . ./� �� :, � , .� , . � � � �, � :� ., � ,. � .0�1 .002 .ODS .009 .019 .037 .WI .150 .90p .60p 7.1B 2.36 4.75 9.5125 19.0 37S 782 ��52 ffi3 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CUY TO SIIT � ��' COBBLEs FlNE MEOHINI CpMSE FlNE COARSE Gravel 43 % Sand 35 % Silt and Ciay 22 9'0 Liquid Limit XX % Plasticity Index XX °�6 Sample of: Clayey Sand and Gravel with Cobbles From: Pit 1 at 5 to 7 Feet 110 044A �:PS�`a-=Fw1t�( GRADATION TEST RESULTS I FIGURE 2 � � �. ,� A L_J �� Ta " ' lin Res� den p ce 115 Forest Road Vail, Colorado Permanent Ground Nail Wall 1. Cover 2. General Notes 3. 4. Approximate Wall Location Elevation View APPROVED ,�� "� Community Developrr^^t �`�=aartment - 9'�: [3uilding Safety 4nd i•;� ;. � � S°rvices IU•. - �n^' . ��-._-.._:id�cl tduil�ing Code/Int�;�._ ... . �:ial G�.�� ' �� c�. -^:?. Tie issuance or gran: �` ;�.all nc; be con�.rG�d to be a permit for, or �n appro��.l .`, .-_ -.:��n of any of the provis;on:, of this ccde or of 2ny other orc:,-��_ ..:'� jurisdicticn. Permits presuming to give authority to v'e'.�:� �_, c.� �cel the provisions cf this code or cther ordinances of the juris4:�:i�� c.` =:! nct be valid. The issuan�e of a permit based on const�4�:;c� :'�^_"' f,_^- �nd other data she!I rot prevent the building official frc-.� rc�:'� ...,, •.,� Correctien cf er�ers in the construction documentJ 4�� G.i�..� l..�la. The building c`:Tic;;:l i� c:!so authorized to prevent occu�.:^cy c° u�� cf a Structur^ �.� '? :� '��i v.olation cf this code or cf any c:l,.ar c� d:nances of this juri�c'.c.;:,, � � � I DATE: / � � � � pLANS EXAMINER: 5. Ground Nail Wall - Typical Cross Section 6. Ground Nail Wall - Details � Yeh and Associates, Inc. D8� Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 384-1500 Fa�c: (970) 384-1501 Sheet Revision Revision/Issue Designed For: Checked by B&Y Drilling, Ine, ��t N��: 210-158 n�� by: Checked by: RDJ Date: Project: September 23, 2010 RDJ ��n af Vail � �R�`�.�� E�.,,�.: � v K � �S/ t !` � ; � � � 1� �: , ; ,� �. '„ � • � � �;,-i�', � ' �f o � s�� r��:`1 � , �: 3a '�� f i3�,�1 �. �- ;•.,.� �:.•9 Cover I Sheet Number: Taplin Residence 1 of 6 ;, i I� j�' 1.0 Ground Nail Wall Materials 1.1 Ground nails - Grade 75 threadbar or equivalent in accordance with ASTM A615, and galvanized or epoxy-coated in accordance with ASTM A153. fy=75,000 psi 1.2 Grout - Grout may be neat-cement or with sand, with Type II cement in accordance with ASTM C150. Water-cement ratio should be between 0.4 and 0.6. f�c=1,500 psi minimum 3 day f�c=3,000 psi minimum 28 day 1.3 End hardware - Nuts and washers shall be in accordance with ground nail manufacturer's recommendations. Bearing plate shall be in accordance with ASTM A36, Grade 36. 1.4 Shotcrete - Shotcrete mix shall consist of Type II cement in accordance with ASTM C150, potable water and normal weight aggregate in accordance with ASTM C33. Admixtures, if used, should be non-corrosive to steel. f'c=4,000 psi (28-day strength) 1.5 Welded wire mesh shall be in accordance with ASTM A185. 1.6 Walers and vertical bearing bars shall be in accordance with ASTM A615. fy=60,000 psi 1.7 Strip drains consist of 12" wide dimpled cores wrapped in geotextile. The compressive strength of the core should be at least 20 psi when tested in accordance with ASTM D1621, and it's in-plane flow capacity should be at least 10 gpm/ft when tested in accordance with ASTM D4716. 1.8 Centralizers should be plastic that will provide free passage of grout and attached to the nails in accordance with the manufacturer s recommendations. 2.0 Ground Nail Wall Construction Sequence 2.1 Excavate one lift to a maximum depth of five feet. 2.2 Install ground nails at the locations and to the lengths shown on the plans. Ground nail location may vary by up to 6". Tremie the grout from the bottom of the hole up. 2.3 Install strip drains, welded wire mesh, walers and bearing bars as shown on the drawings. Use chairs to hold the welded wire mesh away from the soil as necessary. 2.4 Install shotcrete to the minimum thickness shown on the drawings and to attain the minimum coverages specified herein. Give special attention to filling the void in the borehole above the grout line. Cold weather protection measures may be necessary. 2.5 Install the ground nail end hardware after the minimum inside coverage specified herein has been attained. While the shotcrete is still wet, embed the plate into the shotcrete surface until there is no void behind the plate. Handtighten the nut. Install remainder of shotcrete over end hardware to minimum specified thickness and minimum outside cover as specified herein. 2.6 Once the grout and shotcrete have attained 80% of their specific strengths, repeat 2.1-2.5 to the bottom of the wa I I. 2.7 At the bottom lift, complete strip drains to daylight as shown on the drawings. � Yeh and Associates, Inc. Da� Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 ;et Revision Revision/Issue 3.0 Ground Nail Wall Design Parameters 3.1 The ground nail wall has been designed in general accordance with procedures contained in the FWHA "Manual for Design and Construction Monitoring of Soil Nail Walls", Report No. FHWA-SA-96-069R. 3.2 The following strength parameters walls were assumed for the subsoils based on the "Presumptive Soil Parameters for Foundation Design, Proposed Improvements, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado" by HP Geotech, Inc., Project No. 110 044A, dated March 15, 2010. Sand and Gravel Soils � c y qult (deg) (psf) (pcf) (psi) 30 150 125 27 An experienced geotechnical engineer should verify the above design parameters during construction. 3.3 Groundwater level was assumed to be below the base of the wall. 3.4 Factors of safety Global - FS > 1.5 Nail Tension Strength Factor -�N = 0.55 Nail Pullout Resistance Factor -�Q = 0.50 Nail Head Strength Factor -�F = 0.67 3.5 Surcharge loading No surcharge loading was assumed. 3.6 Corrosivity was assumed to be low. 4.0 Special Notes 4.1 Wall geometry used in design was based on information provided by REI Sructural, Inc. plans dated 09.02.10. 42 At least one verification test shall be perFormed on a ground nail to verify the contractors installation method and nail pull-out resistance in accordance with FHWA-SA-96-069R. 4.3 Ground nail verification and proof testing shall be performed in accordance with FHWA-SA-96-069R. 4.4 This design is valid only for B&Y Drilling at the subject site. 4.5 The ground nail wall may be redesigned at the discretion of Yeh and Associates based on verification test results. 4.6 Yeh and Associates is not responsible for maintaining slope stability above and below the ground nail wall during construction. 4.7 The contractors are responsible for field locating all nearby utilities. Conflicting utilities may require ground nail wall redesign, at Yeh and Associates' discretion. 4.8 Yeh and Associates is not responsible for quality control, quality assurance, changed conditions, problems resulting from improper construction techniques, or construction site safety. j % 4.9 Yeh and Associates is not responsible for wall layout. � �� / � � �- �� - '� � � � �_ , ��`� _ � ��, o Designed For: Checked by B&Y Drilling, Inc. Project Number: 210-158 v�� by: Checked by: RDJ Date: Project: September 23, 2010 RDJ General Notes Sheet Number: Taplin Residence 2 of 6 � row � � ezora TOF. �f ti8 p9$ 1E'-0 7-1P _ .__ .__ - - _- ._ . B-71S T.BI�!' 7'.31? 25J]E' 1]'-�iT 3'-]3�C TOW � iOF. � � � — �� TO.W. 07W'-1P B18B'-d � E2Df.10' rl � �_ _ _�___ � TOW . _...— --------------� �,v _ _:.-_-- - — - TOF. ' TOF. eisva I � � eieea• � � TOW - ems-a I i Tow rof j 1 row. cos. ` = rar j e�''�' - esaas I � °�'$ esove -- ----� -- -- ---- _a ylOP"B .. _ ..._'__- _ _ - _ ' _ ____ _____ _ ___ _ _ __ � _ __ _ _ ' - _-' f I TOW. .ow. i � r-- ---- J .oF � —+�ro�osed Ground Nail Wall �$ i j °17�,"' : $ e�,?d � i ' i i�4ax H= 15 feet) � ' I I � T.ow TOF. / ' L_ N�l17E1M � Y cow. � I I aa�re _— � �_ . __ _ - ��W� � TOF TOf T.OW. iOF. l � t�r - e��e-r � j � �'$ � emoiu - apra � � r.ow. g rof T0W ToF row. � � � etanz - e T.OW. I I 9101'8 TO.W. � ean'-01M _ � � % !�'8_, eaore 02�$_ _ °�z � I wnurrvE so�^ � I _____J�� L____J _ _ - - _ _ � � � i ,aW .oF -- -- — —_ _ � ,.oW � a � i �-0W I I � �g T0s - em�-0iK ��ow. �ow � �wR3fi tor � ez�ra_enioae ' � - T[14-P RLASTER a a p ^' a L _ DTG'-01M R3f-61 � �. __ �_ ____ ._ __ ....-w. TOW. .. -- TOF _ -_-..__.-T __�._ _ --Q), I BTlT$ -..�� _ - �8Z0-0T \ �I � ITOF. tOF. l216'-�_ lYLCR i0F � TOW. .. T�� _•. _�1T= E71V.P TOW ( I TOF l27B�P rJ �l744I I I �p� T0� I I TOW. ez�T O.W. � � � A7E'$ I � Ct164"� \� K771'd .- ' I I ! TOF �� _�� I� 9t � � � �r°w. ?ow �+ -� TOF � / �-P TOf. I I Et9'O $ � TOW. TO.F I 1.OW N19-0' -�� i dTl6' P �f I r � ��a - 9R0[E �'� TOF. �f� ��- TOF. I X TOn, RUSIER � eav'� — _. ema � � ez+rs p tow T.or. row L1 I r.o.w cow. g -°2��\, em.a ezo�a .�e 1 I ¢c•.ir uzra �� uars � TOF. TO.W. � 87l9'JI 8��"»� TOF T.OW. I ` ,.b� �� TOW. � I !Z9'.9 u.�� L t t7A7-0' T.O.F. �'d TOW I ��__ a¢. � �� ` ETd'-P TOF !7!r-B �` �_�_ ��__ _ TOW. TOW 'I __ I � __ B7RV � d77T�6 Aifi'-0` I _� A �� - � �� TOW ' I I �� nb+ 7iV ' �� SO.GSf00P �� — __ � —� �� i0F � _ R7' B 0 M N H� ` .oF: '- � �� ; ; .of. �� , . � Yeh and Associates, Inc. De� Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 T�W ,�.aa NJL �r 20 � 1� 20 SCALE� 1" = 20' . �� 'LT O�'OOD � ��}. �`�,� . � f� � � s �R� ��' u° U �� /°�•_� v • i ` � � /,y�,/'� 2�'� , �'. / : ��. . o•. . . . ��-- °� �•��o m�• �� s�,�� ° -�� Notes: 1. Based plan and building layout from provided by REI Structural, Inc. plans dated 09.02.10. 2. The proposed wall location is approximate and may vary based on field conditions. 3. The ground nail wall shall be contained entirely within property boundaries. 4. This drawing should not be used for wall or building layout. Sheet Revision Designed For: Revision/Issue Checked by B&Y Drilling� Il1C. Pro,jecc Number: 210-158 vrawn by: � J Date: rroject: Checked by: � J September 23, 2010 Approximate Wall Location Sheet Number: Taplin Residence 3 of 6 MAXIMUM REINFORCEMENT REINFORCEMENT HORIZONTAL VERTICAL WALL HEIGHT LENGTH SPACING SPACING (DH) B'°`R (RL) (SH) (SV) 15 �� #B GRADE 75 ALL SEE SHEEf 4 5 FEEf 5 FEEf THREAD BAR SHOTCR VEF DEi TOP OF WALL EL. = 8217' � W 3' MAX SV DESIGN HEIGHT=DH VARIES MAXIMUM=15' sv .. �. sy �,: `ti ,.y • . ; : . ,,'. a wvc . � � r .`� '•1' BOTTOM OF WALL ��• AT BOF VOID MAINTAINI FOUNDATII GROUNO � Yeh and Associates, Inc. Da`� Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 STRIP DRAINS SHALL BE 12—INCHES WIDE �"� PLACED 10' ON CENTER AND SHALL NOT EXTEND WITHIN 18—INCHES OF TOP OF SHOTCREfE SHOTCREfE 15 degrees "`� DAYLIGHT STRIP DRAINS OR PIPED � WfTH 4" SCH. 40 TO OUTFALL (SLOT 4" PIPE AND INSERT DR,41N STRIP AT EVERY LOCATION) �ei icevision Revision/Issue Designed For: Checked by B&Y Drilling, Inc. Project Number: 210-158 Drawn by: � J Date: Project: Checked by: � J September 23, 2010 ;^�0 RE��, : � �Y`�� b 14 . � 3 �.:� � - f �� „. . P� Aa.CY �!i` S''�� • � � aX � a/� F-�' • � .�:��. 23�� DRAWING NOT TO SCALE Ground Nail Wall Typical Cross Section Sheet Number: Taplin Residence 5 of 6 VERTICAL BEARING BARS (2) �5 O 6" OC, 30" LONG (OR EQUIVALENT) MESH OVERLAP � MIN 2 GRIDS WELDED WIRE FABRIC 4"x4"—W4.OxW4.0 SHOTCRETE REINFORCEMENT FRONT VIEW r— 8�� FIELD INSTALI � 8" NAII HOLE DIAMETER = BAR DIAMETER + 1/4" BEARING PLATE FRONT VIEW —i f--a/4" BEARING PLATE SIDE VIEW EPDXY COATED �8 ALL ' HORIZONTAL BEARING BARS (2), CONTINUOUS �5 O 6" OC (OR EQUIVALENT) BEARING PLATE 2 IN. (MIN.) COVER STEEL 81 HEX N SHOTCRETE OR CIP CONCRETE GROUND NAIL CROSS SECTION A—A' � Yeh and Associates, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 Sheet Revision Date Revision/Issue SHOTCRETE FACING r�TA� NAIL DRILLEp NAIL BAR L cu..,... GROUND NAIL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE BEARING PLATE 2 IN. (MIN.) COVER HEX Nl 4"x4"—W4.Ox1 WELDED WIRE FABRIC CENTRALIZER O MAX. 10 FT. O.C. AND PROVIDE CENTRAIJZERS WITHIN 2 FT FROM THE TOP AND BOTTOM Of DRILLHOLE EPDXY COATED �8 ALL THREAD BAR 4 IN. (MIN.) MINIMUM CLEAR SHOTCRETE FACING (MINIMUTA 28—DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH 4000 PSI) 2— N0. 5 VERTICAL BARS (OR EQUIVALENT) — N0. 5 WALER BARS (OR EQUIVALENT) �—SHOTCRETE OR NAIL GROUT STEEL BAR WITH CENTRALIZERS (ALL THREADBAR ONLY) NAIL GROUT :� CENTRAUZER • � �N (d►IN. 1 THREADBAR ONLY) � / ,7 � y �..: �' e. GEOCOMPOSITE DRAIN STRIP � - �,E SEE NOTES FOR REQUIREMENTS. {� �'/r�-� '%, �� `� �' L :6� ��J� � �: �: �° �3 / C �: . � � e .� s �P �' , FINISHED WALL SECTION '-'��'eq� ��'�` NOT TO SCALE Designed For: Checked by B&Y Drilling, Inc. Project Number: 210-158 �� by� � J Date: Project: Checked by: � J September 23, 2010 Ground Nail Wall Details Sheet Number: Taplin Residence 6 of 6 ��+� �� ` � � � `�s �.� � , � , � , �� . � 9. y_ a� v6�* L �. ��. $ �.; . '� y � - � �s F '� .� ` � M �Y:: � . `� ��' � ��'`�. �� .. �; t.ic�u� una.. ' �� + ��::, r„ x' � ,a� �*' � . � � �� ` �i �` �� ,: " a3�� t,. y,"� � '" __ : ;� ,� � 1 . ,, TRANSMITTAL FORM �. �� 3� ia �� a:� �7 �� .;.y, �` ,,° �. Y �„,�r :§'�% -;� � � ,y �� +� .._ 7'i �f�,� i�'i`�ri��nrt�,`��.� -- men� ; ;:75 South Fro�r�tag�` E�a�� Vail„�Q.lo�� p� 8#�� ' � � � � �efi�,� .9�Q-47� ��2�;�, � � ` � �� ¢k` �Faicz;,9?��9�� a��Ek�:� v+iVll�n? �3��t��?��C� ', _d t en��v�e�vv,��d�rn�t �� w� � � � ° � � ,� �� . �.�" a' •".Y_ . r. r ��:� Revisio� Submittals: 1. "Field Set" of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections wil! be performed until the revisions are approved & the peRnit is re-issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are $55.00 per hour (2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. Permit #(s) informa6on applies to: Attention: () Revisions _ � ; �� N` ��P�' [ }Response to py rrection Letter � J 1N� attached co of correction letter ( ) Deferred Submittal ��i-��i��.�% �er Project Street Address: "� FD 2G3?` �O A"� (Number) (Street) (Suite #) Building/Complex Name: Contact Infortnation: Company. g�G� QU�IDIMG CoMPA�N', Company Address: �• �• Q� � � � 3 a �ity: vM L state: �_ z�P: 8 l 6 SS Contact Name: �� C2-RY 1� o N 1� Contact Phone: Q 7O •� 7�O • J�3 65J E-Mail " l�2f�Y Ca �EGkQV�Ll�S. Go�_ Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor 8� Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building Plumbing: Electrical: $ $ $ Mechanical: $ Total: � Description / List of Changes: J� l.l� 3 a.0 A�t`1 �,.� s��o�► � cwr t � f ��N �Ng -l�o -�i f .fiior�.�.�� G� ' Ltrr� `,,: � -r�E G� �Nb P�M ; � . � ,� (use additional sheet if necessary) Date Received: p ��o�� NOV 10 2010 OF VAIL oz-J�-io � HEPWORTH-PAWC.AK GEOTECNNICAL 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 89601 Phone: 970-945-T988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hnaeoCa?hpqeotech.com SHOTCRETE CORE TEST REPORT Frank Taplin 1505 Rising Glen Road West Hollywood, California 90069 Job No: 110 044A Project: Taplin Residence, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Permanent Ground Nail Wall, 2nd Row Facing LAB SAMPLE PREPARATION Age When Cored: 7 days End Preparation: Dafe Piaced: 10-99-10 Page: 1 of 9 Saw cut Specified Strength at 28 Days: 4000 psi Distribution: Beck Building Company (terrvtc�beckbuilds.com) Con#ractor Cast Trevor L. Kneil, P.E. Fiefd Observer Reviewed By . • � � � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REPORT Client: Frank Tapiin 1505 Rising Glen Road West Hollywood, California 90069 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-94�8454 hpgeo aQhpgeotech.com Job No.: 170 044A Day: Friday Date: '10129/10 Page: 1 of 1 Project: Tapiin Residence, 115 Farest Road, Vaif, Colorado Weather: Ciear, caim, dry Temperature: 50°F at 11:00 am Contractors Construction Activities: B8�Y Drilling installed ground nails #47 (re-drill), #45, #44, #25, #43, #42, #41, #40A, #21, #22, #23 and #24 (see atEached nail layout ior numbering}. Equipment in Use: BD 70QE air-track dril! rig, grout plant, air compressor HP Geotech's Site Activities: Observed drilling of ground nails #45, #44, #25, #43, #42, #41, #40A, #21, #22, #23 and #24. Prepared bars were instalied in completed borings and grouted, except nails #29, #22 and #23. Nail instaflation abserved this date appeared to be in substantial accardance with the design drawings (Yeh � Associates, dated 9/23/10), provideci. Nail #45 and #47 were dritled and installed prior to our arrival to the site today. Bars were observed to extend about 6 to 8 inches out from the front face of the reinforcing steel. The drill rig was down for re�airs most af the morning. Verbal Communication: B�Y Drilling stated they woutd complete the soil nailing on Monday, (11/1/1 U). distribution: Beck Building Company -- Attn: Terry Bond (terry@beckbuilds.com) Louis Eller SET Field Technician 8230-------.— �..�:.,� �,.....�-- 8220 — — — .-. w a� w c ° 8210 — — — > m w ----------- 8230 8200 -------------- — — — 8220 .-. m °,�' ... ----8210 ° m > m w ------------------8200 8190 ---------------------------------- 8t90 NAIL LENGTH SCHEDULE • 20 feet ��Yeh and Associates, Inc. ConsUldng Gootechnical Engineers 170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 3641500 Fax: (97D) 384-1501 f ;.CL t(BVlslo� �+�.ir•�r. u„�.�w�,,,� � s,. Is.�v uriniag, mc. PnijaA Numbv: 2I0.758 thewn 6y: RDJ ��' Rolen: �� tiY � J Septcmhv 23, 2020 SCALEt HOR[ZONTAL L' = 10' VERTICAL 1' = 10' Elevation View SActtNipnba: Tspl[n Rcsidrnce 4 of 6 � � � HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REPORT Client: Frank Taplin 1505 Rising Glen Road West Hollywood, California 90069 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 97Q-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No.: 110 044A Day: Date: Page Project: Taptin Residence, 915 Forest Road, Vaif, Colorado Wednesday 1 '!l3/10 1 of '! Weather: Ciear, calm, dry Temperature: 30°F af 9:95 am Contractor's Construction Activities: Yeh and Associates performed a'pull test' on 2 test nails installed along the bottom row of the permanent ground nail wall. B�Y Driliing assisted with the testing. Equipment in Use: Testing Equipment HP Geotech's Site Activities: Observed 'pull test' on test nai[ located betwean nails #49 and #50. We left the site prior to testing the second test nail. The test nail at the first row was abandoned and not tested. Verbal Communication: Keith with Yeh and Associa#es indicated that preliminary test results appear adequate. Test results will be forwarded to Terry Bond with Beck Building Company and then provided to us for review. distribution: Beck Building Company — Attn: Terry Bond {terry@beckbuitds.com) Trevor L. Knell, P.E. Fiefd Technician 8230------ 8220 — — — � ., a� � ._.. c ° 8210 — — — > m w 8200 ------------ — — — 8230 — — — 8220 � a�'i r- c — — — 8210 ° � > m w --------�--------------8200 819d------------------------- �—�--.� 8190 NAIL lENGTH SCHEDiJLE • 20 feet ��Yeh and Associates, Inc. Consuldng Geotechnicai Fngineers 170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phonr: (970)384-IS00 Fa�c: {470)384-2501 n,�;��i r•�: BS:Y Driliing, lae. Rqcx Nmahcr. ziatss Dnwn by. g��. RDJ Yml�: �� ,. � J Scptember 23, 2010 SCALE= HORIZONTAL l' = 10' VERT[CAL C = 10' Elevation View Shc�1 Numbx: Taplin Rasidence 4 of b � � � HEPWORiH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL CQNSTRUCTION AC�TIVITY REPORT Client: Frank Tapfin 1505 Rising Glen Road West HoHywood, Califomia 90069 Job No.: 1't0 044A Project: Taplin Residence, 115 Forest Roacl, Vail, Colorado 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 8160't Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Day: Monday Date: 11/1/10 Page: 1 of 1 Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: 45°F at 11:00 am Contractor's Canstruction Activities: B&Y Drilling installed ground nails �#1, #2, #3, and #4, and completed nails #21, #22 and #23 (see attached nail layout for numbering). Equipment in Use: BD 700E air track drill rig, grout pEant, air campressor HP Geotech's Site Activities: Observed drilling of ground nails #1,#2, #3, and #4. Prepared � bars were installed in completed borings and grouted. Nails #21, #22 and #23 were grouted. Nail installation observed this date appeared to be in substantial accordance with the design drawings (Yeh & Associates, dated 9/23/'[O}, provided. Nails were drilled and insialled prior to our arrival to the site ioday. Bars were observed to extend about 6 to 8 inches out from the front face of ihe reinforcing steel. Naii #2 was about 16 inches short of drilled depth. Verbal Communicatian: disMbution: Beck 8uitding Company — Attn: Terry Bond (terry@beckbu[Ids.com) Louis Eller SET Field Technician 8230----------------- Inscde Comer� Outside Corner—� 8220 ----------- � a� w v C ° 8210 ---- W _'m �w azoo --------.__ ----------------_.�-- 823d �----8220 m w ... c — — — 8290 ° > m w -------------------------8200 8190--------------- ---------------- g190 ��Yeh and Associates, Inc. Consulting Geotechnioal F_ngineers 170 Mel Ruy Rcxid Gtenwood Springs, CO S 1601 Phouer (970) 3841500 Far: (970) 384-1501 NAIL LENGTH SCHEDULE • 20 feet na;�.it r,+r. B&i' UrflliaQ, lnc. Roia+Nvmt�u: 210.159 Draxn h : Y RBJ �0k: Pmy;ct: �� September 23, 2010 RDJ SCALE� HpRIZONTAL L' = 10' VERTICAL I' = 10' Elevation View Taplin RcsEdence sM�`�N�� 4of6 0 HP � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REPQRT Client: Frank Taplin 1505 Rising Glen Road West Hollywood, California 90069 5020 County Road 954 Glenwood Springs, CO 8164'[ Phone: 970•945-7988 Fax:970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No.: 110 044A Day: Wednesday Date: 9/29/10 Page: 1 of 1 Project: Taplin Residence, 115 Farest Road, Vail, Colorado Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: 50°F at 8:10 am Contractor's Construction Activities: Idle Equipment in Use: None HP Geotech's Site Activities: Observed reinforcing steei for �rst row of ground nails at proposed permanent ground nail wall, building Grid Lines fi, 7 and E. The wall was designed by Yeh and Associates, Inc. and design drawings (Yeh and Associates, Project Number 290-158, dated September 23, 2010) were provided by Beck Building Company for our use. The wall will E�e contructed by B8�Y Drilling, Inc. The watl is proposed to have a maximum height of '15 feet. A total of 58 nails are proposed to be instafled in 3 rows of 20, 20 and 18, top to botto�n, respectivety. Excavation for the firs# row of nails and erectian of reinforcing steel had been performed prior to our arrival to the site, bu# ground nails had not been installed. The west wing wall portion was not excavated. The soils exposed along the cut face consisted of existing fill and natura[ granular soils. Existing footings were observed in the area of nails #9 and #90 (see at�ached nail layaut for numbering). Nails #1 through #�4 are located in the area of the rough graded access ramp into the site and were not prepared for nail installation. Nail #18 will be installed with west wing wall nai(s #99 and #20 at a tater date. We understand that a thin "flash" coat of shotcrete will be applied to the cut face prior to installing t�e ground naits in order to prevent ravelling of the cut #ace. Reinforcement steel observed between nails #5 and #17 appeared to be in substantial conformance with the details shown on Sheet 6 of 6 of the design drawings with the following exceptions noted below. 1. Welded wire fabric was partially erected around the existing footings which protruded out from the excavated face and rebar was not observed at nails #9 and #10. 2. Verticat bars consisted of No. 4 rebar spraced at approximately 4 1/2" o.c. The grade of the rebar is not known. cant... 3. Horizontal walers consisted of No. 4 rebar spaced at approximately 4 9/2" o.c. ihe grade of the rebar is not known. No splice overlap was specified on the design drawings, but typical(y measured between 27 and 29 inches in length. Verbal Communication: We informed Terry Bond with Beck Building Company of our observations and deviatians from the design drawings noted above. The ground nail wal! engineer of record (Richard Johnson with Yeh and Associates) accepted the rebar spacing as constructed verbally in a tefephone conversation conducted in the job trailer while on-site. The engineer also verified #hat the "flash" coat application was a typicat construction technique and was acceptable at this site. The engineer was not aware af the rebar size discrepancy and staied that he would investigate the matter. Mr. Bond informed us the earthwork contractor would be on- site later in the day to sawcut the protruding footing and B&Y wouid complete steel rein%rcement erection the foliawing day. He also requested a follow-up site visit #o observe the compteted work. distribution: Beck Building Company—Attn: Terry Bond {terry@beckbuilds.com) Trevor L. Knell, P.E. Field Technician 8230---.--�_.._ �i'1c1!'�C rnrnnr -_ �� i� 8220 --- — -- � .°' � ° 8210 — — — ca N W ^'----------- 8230 8220 w � c — — — 821� � ld m w 8200 ---------------.— ----------------82Q0 8'i90 ----------------- ------------�----- 8190 NAIL LENGTH SCHEDULE • 20 feet ��Yeh and Associates, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers ! 70 �1e1 Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phonr: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 3841,501 Dea�l Fr. BStY Drllling, Int. P�cttNiunl+er. 310-158 Lkawn hy: Ddr. RDJ pn�Jca: �� M,. � J Septembcr 23, 2010 SCALE� HORIZONTAL t' = 10' VERTICAL 1' = ip' Elevation View TaptiaRssidmce gh"�NW"e`r 4 0[ 6 , H� � HEPWORTH-PAWL,AK GEOTECHNiCAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REPORT Client: Frank Taplin 1505 Rising Glen Road West Hollywood, Caiifornia 90069 Job No.: 110 Q44A Project Taplin Residence, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado 5020 County Road 15�1 Glenwoad Springs, CO 81609 Phone:9i0-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Day_ Friday Date: 10/1110 Page: 1 of 1 Weather: Clear, ca[m, dry Temperature: 45°F at 8:30 am Contractar's Construction Activities: B8�Y Drilling was preparing to appty "flash" coat between ground nails #5 and #17 (see attached nail layout for numbering) a# proposed lower leve[, permanent ground nail waU. Equipment in Use: Nane HP Geotech's Site Activities: Observed completed reinforcing steel erection at first row of ground nails as a foilow-up to our 9129110 site visit. Reinforcing stee) observed between ground nails #5 and #17 appeared to be in substantial conformance with the details shown on Sheet 6 of 6 of the design drawings. Rebar sizing had been corrected from No. 4 to No. 5 since our 9/29/10 site visit. Application of the "flash" coat wiU be per#ormed later today. Verbal Communication: We informed Terry Bond with Beck Building Company of our observations. disfribution: Beck Building Company — Attn: Terry Bond (terry@beckbuilds.com) Trevor L. Knell, P.E. Field Technician 8230 — — --- � ' Inside Corne�--=} `— — Outside Corner--, $220 ------------ Y � �I � � 8210 — — co a'� w 8240 ------^..--.,—.�.— — — — — — --- — __._ ._ _. _ —. _ —,. 8230 --`—'----8220 � V� c -- — 8210 ° > d `w �..�.—.�--..�—�_�.--,—_.._.-8200 8190-----------_..---� ----------------- 8190 ��Yeh and Associates, Tuc. Gonsttlsing Geotechnical Engineers 170 Me! Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phour: (970} 384I500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 NAIL LENGTH BCHEDULE • 20 feet nr�i�c,t r•oc B�Y DriUing, Ina rrojax Nwnbcr. 210-158 ur.ur nY RDd De1c Projar. a+od�oa a�: �Ptembcr 23, 2010 RAJ SCALE: H�RIZONTAL t' _ !0' VERTICAL 1' = 10' Elevation View Taplin Residence �KNumLcr, 4of6 ► H� � HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOiECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REPORT Client: Frank Taplin 9505 Rising Glen Road West Hollywood, California 90069 Job No.: 110 044A Project Taplin Residence, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado 502Q County Road 154 Glenwooc! Springs, CO 81B41 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax:870-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Day: Tuesday Date: 10l519 0 Page: 1 of 1 Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: 68°F at 11:00 am Contractor's Construction Activities: B&Y Drilling installed ground naits #7 through #17 and a test nail (see attached nail tayout for numbering). Equipment in Use: BD 700E air-track drill rig, grout ptan#, air compressor HP Geotech's Site Activities: �bserved insiatlation of ground nails #7 through #17 and a test nail between nails #12 and #13. Grout tubes were attached to the bars with duct tape. Grout consisted of Quikrete Type I/ll p(aced in drill hvles after inserting prepared bars. Nails were installed in substantial accordance with the design drawings (Yeh & Associates, dated 9/23/10), provided. Verbal Cammunication: We informed Terry Bond with Beck Building Company of our observations. distribution: Beck 8uitding Company — Attn: Terry Bond (terry@beckbuilds.com) Louis Eller, SET Field Technician 8230-----------. I nside Outside Comer—. 8220 ---------- a� � � � � 8210 — — — m > a� w ier--� ^--'--'"------.�—�_� 8230 `---'�--8220 .^ a� w c — — — 8210 .° m > m `w 8200 --------------- ----------------8200 819p----------------- --------------____ g190 ��Yeh and Associates Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 170 Me1 Ray Rood Glenwaod Springs, CO 8 f 601 Phone: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 NAtL LENGTH SCHEDULE • 20 feet o«��a r•��: — B&Y Drilliag, [nc. 'rolccC Nunl�cr. TIO•158 [kawr hy: RD7 Date: PruJca: �� nY � J September 23, 20I0 SCALE= HOR[ZONTAL l' = 10' VERT[CAL 1' = i0' Elevation View TaplinResidcnce ��N1tl"b°` 4of6 H� � HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REPORT Client: Frank Taplin 1505 Rising Gten Road West Hollywood, Catifamia 90069 Job No.: 110 044A Project: Taplin Residence, 915 forest Road, Vail, Colorado 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, GO 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo aQhpgeotech.com Day: Friday Date: 1018/10 Page: 1 of 1 Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: 65°F at 12:30 pm Contracto�'s Consiruction Activities: B8�Y Dritling was preparing to appfy "flash" coat between ground nails #18 and #Z0, and #26 and #37 (see attached nail layout for numbering) at proposed permanent ground nail wall. Equipment in Use: HP Geotech's Si#e AcUvities: None Observed reinforcing steel for �rst row, west wing wa(! and second row of ground nails at proposed permanen# ground nail wall. Excavation for the first row, west wing walf and second row of nails and ereciion of reinforcing steel had been performed priar to our arriva) to the site, bufi ground nails had not been installed. Nails #18 through #20 were abserved to descend in eievation with ihe existing grounc! slope. The soils exposed along the cut face consisted mainly of natural granular soils wi#h weathered beclrock near the bottom of the cut #ace at fhe west side. We understand that a thin "flash" coat of shotcrete will be applied to the cut face prior to installing the ground nails in order to prevent ravelling of the cu# face. Reinforcing steel abserved between nails #18 and #20, and #26 and #37 appeared to be in substantial canformance with #he details shown on Sheet 6 of 6 0# the design drawings. Nails #21 through #25 are located in the area of the rough graded access ramp into the site ancf cauld not be prepared for nail installation. Nails #38 through #40 will be insta[led with the third row of naits. Verbal Communication: We informed Terry Bond (via telephane) with Beck Building Company of our observations. distribution: Beck Building Company — Attn: 7erry 8ond (terry@beckbuilds.com) Trevor l.. Knell, P.E. 8230--------- Inside Outside Corner- 8220 ----�--�— m w � C � $2 � � -- — --- > N W 6200 — — — — ---------------- 8230 -----8220 B ?O � 1 • p� � �— � � — _` 82 � � ;� N N W `----------------------------8200 8190---------------- ---------^�—,.—_.,— 8190 ��Yeh and Associates, Inc. Consu?ting Geoiechnical Engineers 170 Met Ray Road Glenwood Sprincs, CQ 81601 Phonr: (970) 384-I500 Fax: (970} 384-1501 NAIL LENG7H SCHEDULE • 20 feet n�.;�ra r�r Bdcl' nrillia�, inc. zio-iss w.� tiy: RDd �°" Projcst: �.�m �,. � J Septcmbcr 23, 20I0 SCA�E� HOR[ZONTAL 1' = 10' VERT[CAL 1' = 10' Elevation View T�plin Residencc �YN�� 4 0[ 6 l � T � � � t�°'�i'� HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNfCAi CONSTRUCTtON ACTIVITY REPORT Client: Frank Taplin 1505 Rising Gfen Road West Hoilywood, California 90069 Job No.: 110 d44A Project: Tapfin Residence, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-9457988 F2rx: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Day: Monday Date: 10/11/90 Page: 7 of '! Weather: Clear, catm, dry Tempera#ure: 58°F at 11:00 am Contractors Construc#ion Activities: B&Y Drilling installed ground nails #5, #fi, #18 through #20 and #26 through #37 (see attached nail layout for numbering). Equipment in Use: BD 700E air-track dril! rig, grout plant, air compressor HP Geotech's Site Activities: Observed installation of ground nails #5, #6, #18 through #20 and #26 through #37. Grout tubes were attached to the bars with duct tape. Grout consisted of Quikrete Type 1/tl ptaced in drill holes after inserting prepared bars. A bar was not be placed at nai! #27 because of contact with nail #26. Nai[s were installed in substantial accordance with the design drawings (Yeh & Associates, dated 9/23110), provided. Verbal Communication: None distribution: Beck Building Company -- Attn: Terry Bond (terry@beckbuilds.comj Louis Efler, SET Field Technician 8230--------- InsideComer—� ^--'---�---------- 8230 Outside Corner---, Strip Drains 8220 ------.._—�—_. -- — � ------ � — ^ — — — ` — 8220 � ♦ � • • • � • � � 11 1 13 74 15 1B 17 16 79 20 v � r � • • • • � • • • p� 0 21 � � 24 ❑�` 28 27 28 29 a 31 32 33 j� � .,n., �� 82�� —� — — ^ —i a�i a, � s� � �� — — — 82'10 ° w ❑ 42 43 �� 4 4°° S' b2 0 0 � 0 37 0 > . . . . . . . . . . 4 .. �, 8200 ----------------- -----------------8200 8190------------.^�_ ------------------ 8190 NAIL LENGTH SCHEDULE • 20 feet ��Yeh and Associates, Inc. ConsuRing Geotechnical 8ngineers t70 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO S160i Phone: (970) 384-i S00 Fsuc: (970) 384-1501 :CC iCCV1S20n D<+q;nedF�r. u�.wom�we ��yy BScY Drilling, iac. PmJat NwnLcr; ziaiss �� RDJ �`' Pmjcct: �� M,. � 3cptembcr 23, 2010 SCALE� NORIZ�NTAL 1' = IO` VERTICAL F' � 10' Elevation View Taplin RcsldCrtce �1D1''�Nwnh�r, 4 0{'6 . � H� � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REPORT Client: Frank Taplin 7505 Rising Glen Road West Hailywood, California 90069 Job No.: 190 044A Project: Taplin Residence, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado 5Q20 County Road 954 Glenwood Springs, CO 816Q1 Phone: 976-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 h p g eo@tipgeotech. com Day: Tuesday Date: 10/19/14 Page: 9 of 1 Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: 45°F at 8:20 am Contractor's Construction Activities: B&Y Drilling was preparing to apply "fiash" coat between ground nails #38 and #40, and #44 and #58 (see attached nail layout for numbering) at proposed permanent graund nail wall. Equipment in Use: None HP Geotech's Site Activities: Observed reinforcing steel for second raw, west wing wall and third row of ground nails at proposed permanent ground nail wall. Excavation for #he second row, west wing walt and third row of nails, and erection of reinforcing s#eel had been per�ormed prior to our arrival to the site, but ground nails had not been installed. Nails #38 through #44 were observed to slightty descend in elevation with the existing ground slope. The soils exposed along the cut face consisied of naturaf granular soils on the east half and weathered fo competent bedrock on the west haff. We understand that a thin "flash" coat of shotcrete will be applied to the cut face prior to instalfing the ground nails in order to prevent ravelting of the cut face. Reinforcing steei observed between nails #38 and #40, and #44 and #58 appeared to be in substantial conformance with the details shown on Sheet 6 of 6 of the design drawings. Nails #41 through #43 are located in the area of the rough graded access ramp into fhe site and could not be prepared for nail installaiion. Yerbal Comrnunication: We infvrmed Terry Bond with Beck Building Company of our observations. distribution: Beck Building Company — Attn: Terry Bond (terry@beckbuitds.com) Trevor L. Kneli, P.E. Field Technician 8230 — — --. .— .— — � — Insid r�..,o.. —�.—^--------- Outside Corner- 8220 ----------�— � s � • • • • �s— � 8210 --- 21 �p � p� W41 4�2 43 q I — — ~ — — 8230 � — — — 8220 m � ---82'!0 ° > m W s2ao ------------ -------------z_�---�.—s2oa 8190-------------------------------8190 NAIL LENG7H SCHEDULE • 20 feet ��Yeh and Associaies, Tnc. Consulring Geotechnicat Bngineers 170 Mei Ray Road Glenwood 5prings, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 SCA�E� HpR[ZaNTQL 1' _ !0' VERT[CAL 1' = t0' �CI1Ce.V1610� Duai�tF<r. k�.+�a�n.,.A �y yy B&1' DNIIinR, Ina P�N�� Elevation View 210-158 lkownby. Da�q RDJ Pmjea: shcc� xum6cr. �y,�;� yY Septcmbcr 23.2010 Taplin Rcs�deucc 4 oC 6 RDJ . � � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNtCAL CONS7RUCTlON ACTIVITY REPORT Client: Frank Taptin 1505 Rising Glen Road West HoHywood, California 90069 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81641 Phone: 97U-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No.: 110 044A Day: Thursday Date: 10I21/10 Page: 1 of 1 Project: Taplin Residence, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado Weafher: Ciear, calm, dry Temperature: 45°F at 9:14 am Contractor's Constructian Activities: BB�Y Drilting installed ground nai�s #27, #46, #48 through #57 and 2 test nails (see attached nait layout for numbering). Equipment in Use: BD 700E air-track drill rig, grout plant, air cflmpressor HP Geotech's Site Activities: Observed drilling of ground nails #27 and #46 through #49. Prepared bars were installed in completed borings and grouted, except nail #47 where 10' of drill steel was lost in the borehole during drilling. The 6orehole for nail #47 was grouted and will be re-drilled at a later date. Nail installation observed this date appeared to be in substantial accordance with the ciesign drawings (Yeh 8� Associates, dated 9/23/10), provided. Nai[s #50 through #57 were drilled and grouted on 10/20/10 after we had left the site and the drifl rig been repaired. The test nails were drilled and installed prior to our arrival to the site today. Bars were observed to extend about 6 to 8 inches out from the front face of the reinforcing steel. Test nails were installed between nails # 49 and #50, and #40 and #58. Picked up a shotcreie panel prepared by B&Y Drilling and delivered it our laboratory for strength testing. Verbal Communication: Terry Bond with Beck Building Company provided us with the upcoming project schedute prior to him leaving the siie. distribution: Beck Building Company — Attn: Terry Bond (terry@beckbuilds.com) Trevor L. Knell, P.E. Fieid Technician 8230---------------------.__.._-- Inside Corner--` — — — — — — $230 Outside Corner--, Strip Drains 822Q ---------- -- --------- --------8220 :.. � 3 B ! 4 15 18 77 78 19 20 v • • • • • � r • • � • • • • I • • • • • � •� 82 �i Q --- — ^ �—� � � _� � � � � � � � _�___33 � � 3�-- � 3`, _ ` _ 82 � fl � W � � � � � � �T � � � � � 0 � � � � � N � W 8200 -----------------------.`—� ------8200 8190------------_..--�.--____.--�— --------8190 NAIL LENGTH SCHEDULE � 20 feet ��Yeh and Associates. Inc. Consulting Geotechnicel Fngineers 170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 3841500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 i 0 SCALE� HORIZONTAL 1' = 10' VERTICAL 1' = 10' Dc,yxw,� x�r. — BSrY Drlllia� inc. PmjtttNunM1Cx: Elevation View 210-158 lkarn h : y �f Date: p�� SIicClNUmbc': �� SeptemAer 23, 2010 Taplia Res3drnce q of 6 � RDJ � � � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REPORT Client: Frank Taplin 1505 Rising Glen Road West Hollywood, Califomia 900fi9 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phnne: 97Q-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeatech.com Job No.: 110 044A Day: Wednesday Date: 9 0I20/10 Page: 1 of 1 Project Taplin Residence, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: 40°F at 9:20 am Contrdctor's Construction Activifies: B&Y Drilling instalted ground naits #38 through #40, part of #57 and #58 (see attached naiE layout for numbering). Equipment in Use: BD 700E air-track dritl rig, grout planf, air compressor HP Geotech's Site Activities: Observed drilling of ground nails #38, #58 and part of #5T. Drllling ceased after about 15 feet ai nail #57 after a hydrauiic line ruptured. Prepared bars were installed in nails #38 and #58. No grouting was performed and we left the site at 11:30 am while repairs were made to the dritl rig. N�il installation observed this date appeared to be in substantial accoMance with the design drawings (Yeh � Associates, dated 9/23/70), provided. Nails #39 and #40 were drilled and bars instafled prlor ta our arrival to the site. Bars were observed to extend about 6 to 8 inches aut from the frontface of reinforcing steel. Verba( Communication: Terry Bond with Beck Building Company was informed of our observatins and the dri(iing progress. He informed us that drilling would like[y resume the following day after repairs were made to the drill rig. We discussed completion vf nail #27 (see 10/1111Q report) with Richard Johnson with Yeh $ Associates via te[ephone. He informed us ihai it was acceptable to re-drill hole provided it remained centered between the reinforcing steel and avoided contact with completed nait #26. We also discussed our concern about hydraulic fluid whlch had sprayed on a portion of the completed wal! after the hydrau(ic line rupture and it's potential effect on aciherence of the final shotcrete coat on the third row "flash" coating. Mr. Johnson stated that he had observed similar conditions on a previous job and was not aware of any methods for removing the hydraulic fluid and did not note any adverse effects after applying the final coat of shotcrete in ihat case. distribution: Beck Buitding Company — Attn: Terry Bond {terry@beckbuiids.com) Trevor L, Knell, P.E, Field Technician 8230 — — — — 8220 — — — .-. w N w C � $2�� _'_- > a� w ----�— ----------- --- 8230 — — — 8220 m � C ----8210 ° m > m w 8200 ----------------------------------8200 8190-------------------------------8190 NAIL LENGTH SCHEDULE � 20 feef ��Yeh and Associates, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Fngineers 170 Mel Aay Rood Glenwood Springs, CO 8 i 601 Phonr: (970) 384-I500 Fax: (910) 384-1501 ♦ _ �C[ KCV1S101] 1kyp�fF�r. ke.uew� �k�M. BfiYDrininR,rac. ProjR.lNumhcr 220-i58 INuYT by. RD7 �°1O' Prnjcd: c�� Septemher 23, 2010 RDJ SCALE� HORIZONTAL 1' = iQ' VERTICAL 1' = 10' Bievation View ShxlNum6cr. Taplln RCxldeott 4 of6 H� � HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHN[CAL CfJNSTRUCTION ACTiVITY REP�RT Client: Frank Taplin 1505 Rising Gten Road West Hallywood, California 90Q89 5020 County Road 754 Glenwood Springs, C� 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No.: 110 044A Day: Tuesday Date: 10l26/10 Page: 1 of 1 Project: Taplin Residence, 175 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado Weather: Cloudy, light breeze, light snow Temperature: 30°F at 12:24 pm Contractor's Construction Activities: B�Y Drilling was preparing to appty "flash" coat between ground nails #9 and #4, #29 and #25, and #40A and #43 (see attached nail tayout for numbering) at proposed permanent ground nail wall. Equipment in Use: HP Geotech's Site Activities: None 06served reinforcing steel for remaining ground naiis at east end and east wing wall at proposed permanent grounct nail wall. Excavation for the easi end and east wing wall, and erection of reinforcing steel had been perFormed prior to our arrival to the site, but ground nails had not been installed. Nails #9 through #4were observed to slightly descend in elevation with the existing ground slope. Nail #40A was added east of nai! #40 of the third row. The soifs exposed along the cut face consisted of existing fill soiis overlying natural granular soils. We unde�stand that a thin "flash" coat of shotcrete wiU be applied to the cut face prior to instatling the ground nails in order to prevent ravelling of the cut face. Reinforcing steel observed between nails #1 and #4, #21 and #25, and #40A and #43 appeared to be 9n substantial conformance with the details shown on Sheet 6 of 6 of the design drawings, Some patches of snow were observed on the cut face, and the soils expased appeared thawed and free af frost. Verbal CommunicatiOn: We informed Justin Yenter with B&Y Drilling of our observations. He informed us that he blow any snow off of #he cut face prior to applying shotcrete and cover the area with construction blankets when completed. Also, he informed us that drilling would be delayed until the excavator could widen the excavation for drill rig access. distribution: Beck Building Company — Attn: Terry Bond (terry@becKbuilds.com) Trevar L. Knell, P.E. Field Technician 8230--------------------=------- inside Corner Uutsids Comer Strip Drains 8220 ---------- -- ---------- -- .: � 3 4 6 7 8 9 1 3 1 15 SB 17 � • � • • � • � • 1 � • • • • � • � 82 � fl--- 21 a � z4 � Q 2T 28 � 35 Q 33 � 35 � 37 j —� � �— � �— � OA 1 � � � � q❑g � 4B 49 Q 51 52 � � 55 SB � • • � • � � � � • � • � • • • 82�� ------------------^--------....— ------ 8230 ----8220 � w _ — _ 82�0 � N N W -----8200 8190 --------------------------------- 8190 NAIL LENGTH SCMEbULE • 20 feet ��Yeh aqd Associates, Inc. Consulting Geotechnioal Fngineers 170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81641 Yhonr: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 • ' . SCALE� HORIZONTAL 1' = 10' VERTICAL 1' = LO' n�.;i,�� r•��: B&1' Drilling, inc. PnqcaN�nhcr; E�BV$iIOIl v10W 210-159 u�.�.m nr RDJ °aic� rMia�: sn� N� a�.�ed ny. � J �ptcmbcr 23, 2010 'CapNn Rcsidcncc 4 of 6 �' HP � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com CONCRETE TEST REPORT � lb ° Frank Taplin Job No. 1505 Rising Glen Road Date Cast: Los Angeles, California 90069 Revised* Sheet: Project: Taplin Residence, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Walls, Lines 4.5 - 1 Supplier: B&B Time Batched Truck No: 6042 Time Arrived: Ticket No: Time Placed: Mix Design: 36012474 Method of Placement: Pump 110 044A 01-21-11 1of1 6 ;� L J� 9:46 am Load Size (Yds): 9 11:20 am Yds Delivered: 9 11:30 am Yds Ordered: 27 Sample Point: Truck discharge Time Sampled: 11:35 am Slump: 2 3/< inches Air Temp: 28° Air Content: 7.6 % Concrete Temp: 74° Wet Unit Wt: 142.1 pcf Water Added: 10 gallons added by pump operator Communication: The Contractor was informed of field test results. Time Cylinders Cast: 11:45 am Initial Cure: 3 days on site Field Storage: Heated Job Trailer Date Stripped: 01-24-11 � Compressive Strength Data 2010 Compressive 2g Da Lab A9e Date Load Diameter Area Y Number Days Ibs. in. �nz Strength (psi) Avg. (psi} 028A 7 01-28-11 38,600 4.01 12.63 3060 0286 28 02-18-11 53,400 4.01 12.63 4230 4230 028C 28 02-18-11 53,400 4.01 12.63 4230 028D 56 03-18-11 Specified Strength: 3000 psi at 28 days Notes: *Specified strength revised to 3000 psi, original issued test report stated 4000 psi. Distribution: Frank Taplin (franktaalin(a�amail.com) Terry Bond-Beck Buitders terrvan.beckbuilds.com Justin Orgill James Parker, PG, EIT Field Technician Reviewed By HP � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax:970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com CONCRETE TEST REPORT Frank Taplin � � Job No. 110 044A 1505 Rising Glen Road Date Cast: 01-26-11 Los Angeles, California 90069 Sheet: 1 of 1 Project: Taplin Residence, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Walls; Lines 4.5 - 7 Supplier: B8�B Time Batched Truck No: 6003 Time Arrived: Ticket No: B2136324 Time Placed: Mix Design: 36012477 Method of Placement: Pump 9:48 am Load Size (Yds): 10 11:15 am Yds Delivered: 10 11:40 am Yds Ordered: 67 Sample Point: Truck discharge Time Sampled: 11:44 am Slump: 4 1/2 inches Air Temp: 32° Air Content: 5.4 % Concrete Temp: 70° Wet Unit Wt: 144.2 pcf Water Added: 25 gallons added by supplier Communication: The Supplier was informed of field test results. Time Cylinders Cast: 11:54 am Initial Cure: 24 hrs on site Field Storage: Trailer Date Stripped: 01-27-11 Cyt Temp at Pick Up: 62° Min/Max: 62°/72° Compressive Strength Data 2010 Lab Age Load Diameter Area Compressive 2g Day Date Number �ays Ibs. in. inZ Strength (psi) Avg. (psi) 035A 7 02-02-11 56,200 4.01 12.63 4450 035B 28 02-23-11 70,OOU 4.01 12.63 5540 5480 035C 28 02-23-11 68,600 4.01 12.63 5430 035D 56 03-23-11 Specified Strength: 3000 psi at 28 days Notes: Distribution: Frank Taplin (franktaqlin(u)qmail.comj Terry Bond-Beck Builders terrvCc�beckbuilds.com Justin Orgill James Parker, PG, EIT Field Technician Reviewed By HP � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood 5prings, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com CONCRETE TEST REPORT Frank Taplin Job No. 110 044A 1505 Rising Glen Road Date Cast: 12-29-10 Los Angeles, California 90069 Sheet: 1 of 1 Project: Taplin Residence, 115 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Building Perimeter and Pad Footings Supplier: B8�B Time Batched: 8:58 am Load Size (Yds): Truck No: 6003 Time Arrived: 10:50 am Yds Delivered: Ticket No: 62136296 Time Placed: 11:00 am Yds Ordered: Mix Design: Win 3 Master Exterior Method of Placement: Pump Sample Point: Truck discharge Time Sampled: 11:10 am Slump: 4 3/. inches Air Temp: 18° Air Content: 5.0% Concrete Temp: 72° Wet Unit Wt: 138.9 pcf Water Added: 10 gallons added by contractor Communication: The Contractor was informed of field test results. Time Cylinders Cast: 11:20 am Initial Cure: 5 days on site Field Storage: Heated job trailer Date Stripped: 01-03-11 10 10 32 Compressive Strength Data 2010 Lab Age Load Diameter Area Compressive 2g Day Date Number Days Ibs. in. in2 Strength (psi) qy9_ (psi) 984A 7 01-05-11 31,000 4.01 12.63 2450 984B 28 01-26-11 43,800 4.01 12.63 3470 3360 984C 28 01-26-11 41,200 4.01 12.63 3260 984D 56 02-23-11 53,800 4.01 12.63 4260 I Specified Strength: 3000 psi at 28 days Notes: Distribution: Frank Taplin (franktaplin(a�gmail.com) Terry Bond-Beck Building Company (terrvCa�beckbuilds.com) Buzz Taplin (buzztaalin(�comcast.net) James Parker Thomas J. Westhoff, CET Field Technician Reviewed By