HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-01-06 Town Council Agenda and Supporting Documentation1.Call to Order (4:00pm)
2.Presentation/Discussion (4:00pm)
2.1 Winter Revenue and Economic Update (4:00pm)30 min.
Listen to presentation and provide feedback.
Presenter(s): Russell Forrest, Town Manager, Carlie Smith,
Director of Finance, and Mia Vlaar, Director of Tourism and
Economic Development
Background: With a slow start to the winter season, staff has
prepared an update for Council outlining what the Town is
hearing from local businesses and the steps being taken to
prepare for a mild winter and potential revenue impacts.
2.2 Timber Ridge Employee Housing Opportunity Discussion
(4:30pm)
20 min.
Listen to presentation and provide feedback.
Presenter(s): Krista Miller, Human Resource and Safety and
Risk Director and Albert Zamora, Human Resources Manager
Background: Timber Ridge represents a major Town
investment in workforce housing and a unique opportunity to
create ownership options for TOV employees.
3.DRB/PEC Update (4:50pm)
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
Evening Session Agenda
Vail Town Council Chambers and virtually by Zoom.
Zoom meeting link: https://vail.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_FxIqvBTlRCW9B_2poUQ0rA
4:00 PM, January 6, 2026
Notes:
Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine what time
Council will consider an item.
Public comment will be taken on each agenda item.
Public participation offers an opportunity for attendees to express opinions or ask questions regarding
town services, policies or other matters of community concern that are not on the agenda. Please keep
comments to three minutes; time limits established are to provide efficiency in the conduct of the meeting
and to allow equal opportunity for everyone wishing to speak.
2026 Revenue and Economic Update Update.docx
Vail Lodging Performance Update.pdf
Vail Lodging Pulse Survey -2.pdf
Snow Summary.pdf
Timber Ridge TOV Employee Housing Council Memo_.docx
EHOP- Timber Ridge Council presentation.pptx
1
3.1 DRB/PEC Update (5 min.)
4.Information Update (4:55pm)
4.1 December 2025 Revenue Update
4.2 October 14, 2025 VLHA Minutes
4.3 November 11, 2025 VLHA Meeting Minutes
4.4 December 9, 2025 VLHA Meeting Minutes
4.5 December 16, 2025 VLHA Meeting Minutes
5.Matters from Mayor, Council, Town Manager, and Committee Reports (4:55pm)
5.1 Mayor, Town Council and Committee Reports (15 min.)
5.2 Town Manager Report (20 min.)
5.3 Council Matters and Status Update
6.Executive Session (5:30pm) (30 min.) Executive Session pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-6-402(4)
(b) to hold a conference with the Town Attorney, to receive legal advice on specific legal
questions; and C.R.S. § 24-6-402(4)(e) to determine positions relative to matters that may be
subject to negotiations, develop a strategy for negotiations and instruct negotiators on the
topic of Town of Vail pending litigation.
7.Public Participation (6:00pm)
7.1 Public Participation
8.Any action as a result of Executive Session
9.Consent Agenda (6:10pm)
9.1 December 2, 2025 TC Meeting Minutes
9.2 December 16, 2025 TC Meeting Minutes
10.Action Items (6:10pm)
10.1 West Lionshead Supplemental Budget Request and 10 min.
DRB Results 12-17-25.pdf
PEC Results 12-22-25.pdf
260106 Town of Vail Revenue Update.pdf
2025-10-13 VLHA Meeting Minutes.pdf
2025-11-11 VLHA Meeting Minutes.pdf
2025-12-09 VLHA Meeting Minutes.pdf
2025-12-16 VLHA Special Meeting Minutes.pdf
TM Update 010625.docx
260106 Matters.docx
Future Topics.docx
Public_Participation_010626.pdf
120225 TC Meeting Minutes.pdf
121625 TC Meeting Minutes.pdf
2
Reimbursement Agreement (6:10pm)
Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a
form approved by the Town Attorney, with East West Partners,
in an amount not to exceed $400,000 and approve the
reappropriation of $125,000 from 2025 Civic Area Master Plan
savings to support the exploration of an expanded potential
Downtown Development District beyond the West Lionshead
area.
Presenter(s): Matt Gennett, Community Development Director
and Carlie Smith, Finance Director
Background: The West Lionshead project and a potential
Downtown Development Authority(DDA) will require the Town
to retain consultants with those costs reimbursed by East West
Partners under a reimbursable agreement not to exceed
$400,000. Additionally, the Town seeks to evaluate a potential
expansion of the district beyond West Lionshead, which would
be funded using $125,000 in 2025 Civic Area Master Plan
savings.
11.Public Hearings (6:20pm)
11.1 Resolution No. 1, Series of 2026, A Resolution of the Vail
Town Council Making Findings on the Appeal of Case
#DRB25-0343 and Affirming the Decision of the Design
Review Board (534 East Lionshead Circle) (6:20pm)
5 min.
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 1,
Series of 2026.
Presenter(s): Matt Mire, Town Attorney
Background: On December 16, 2025, the Town Council held a
properly-noticed hearing on the appeal, and the Appellant was
provided with an opportunity to present evidence in support of
its appeal and following the hearing, the Town Council directed
the Town Attorney to prepare a Resolution with written findings
regarding the appeal.
11.2 Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025, First Reading, An
Ordinance Approving the Establishment of a New Special
Development District No. 44, Lunar Park, and Specifically
to Approve the Development of a Multi-Family
Development located at 442 South Frontage Road East
(6:25pm)
75 min.
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No.
28, Series of 2025 upon first reading.
Presenter(s): Greg Roy, Planning Manager
Background: The applicant, Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC,
represented by Ruther Associates is requesting approval for
the establishment of a new Special Development District,
pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development Districts,
Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a multi-family
010626 Supplemental EWP.docx
Reimbursement Agreement Template.docx
Res. 1 Series of 2026.docx
3
project, located at 442 South Frontage Road East/ Vail Village
Filing 5, Tract D.
12.Adjournment (7:40pm)
Ordinance No. 28 Staff Memorandum - Lunar Park - SDD.docx
Attachment A. Vicinity Map.pdf
Attachment B. Applicant Narrative.pdf
Attachment C. Lunar Park Traffic Assessment 7-17-25.pdf
Attachment D. Lunar Park - EIR - 7-23-25.pdf
Attachment E. PEC25-0026 Documents.pdf
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans Part1.pdf
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans Part2.pdf
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans Part3.pdf
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans Part4.pdf
Attachment G. 9-8-25 PEC Results.pdf
Attachment H. PEC Results 9-22-25.pdf
Attachment I. Letter from Vail AIPP.pdf
Attachment J. Employee Housing Plan - Updated.pdf
Attachment K. Housing Department Comments.pdf
Attachment L. Public Comment.pdf
Attachment M. PEC Results 10-13-25.pdf
Attachment N. PEC25-0026 SDD Staff Memo.pdf
Attachment O. Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025.pdf
Attachment P. November 4, 2025 Town Council Minutes.pdf
Attachment Q. PEC25-0026 Revised Plans Part1.pdf
Attachment Q. PEC25-0026 Revised Plans Part2.pdf
Attachment Q. PEC25-0026 Revised Plans Part3.pdf
Attachment Q. PEC25-0026 Revised Plans Part4.pdf
Attachment R. November 4, 2025 Staff Presentation.pdf
Attachment S. November 4, 2025 Applicant Presentation.pdf
Public Participation Lunar Vail.pdf
Ord. 28 Staff Presentation 1-6-26.pdf
110425_Ruther_Presentation.pdf
Public Comment.pdf
Meeting agendas and materials can be accessed prior to meeting day on the Town of Vail website
www.vail.gov. All Town Council meetings will be streamed live by High Five Access Media and available
for public viewing as the meeting is happening. The meeting videos are also posted to High Five Access
Media website the week following meeting day, www.highfivemedia.org.
Please call 970-479-2460 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon
request with 48 hour notification dial 711.
4
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.1
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
TIME:30 min.
SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager
ITEM TYPE:Presentation/Discussion
AGENDA SECTION:Presentation/Discussion (4:00pm)
SUBJECT:Winter Revenue and Economic Update (4:00pm)
SUGGESTED ACTION:Listen to presentation and provide feedback.
PRESENTER(S):Russell Forrest, Town Manager, Carlie Smith, Director of Finance,
and Mia Vlaar, Director of Tourism and Economic Development
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
2026 Revenue and Economic Update Update.docx
Vail Lodging Performance Update.pdf
Vail Lodging Pulse Survey -2.pdf
Snow Summary.pdf
5
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Economic Development and Finance Departments
DATE: January 6th, 2026
SUBJECT: Economic Update
I. SUMMARY
With a slow start to the winter season, staff has prepared an update for Council outlining what the
Town is hearing from local businesses and the steps being taken to prepare for a mild winter and
potential revenue impacts.
II. DISCUSSION
Through November 2025, the Town’s sales tax collections total $36,376,756, up 2.72%, or
$1,088,993 above the annual sales tax budget with the most recent month, November,
reflecting a decrease of 3.1% or $56,676 from the prior year. Even with a slower start to
snowfall this winter season, it is anticipated that the Town will meet or exceed its overall
revenue budget for 2025. When combined with expenditure savings, this performance is
expected to contribute to the Town’s fund balance.
Looking ahead to 2026, Finance staff will continue to closely monitor revenues and will work
with the Tourism and Economic Development Department to update forecasts based on
anecdotal information from local businesses and information from Destmetrics. The Town’s
2026 budget already reflects a conservative outlook, including a 2% decrease in
revenues with a flat revenue forecast in the General Fund. As a result, the adopted budget
includes a projected General Fund surplus of approximately $2.1 million.
Staff has evaluated several revenue impact scenarios related to potential declines in guest
visitation during the current winter season and into the following winter season
(November/December 2026):
Scenario 1: 5% Decrease in Revenues
Due to the conservative nature of the adopted budget and stronger than expected 2025
revenues, there is already a built-in revenue buffer. Under this scenario, staff would recommend
managing staffing vacancies and reducing capital project expenditures by approximately 5–
10%, with no reductions to operating budgets.
6
- 2 -
Scenario 2: 10% Decrease in Revenues
Staff would recommend managing staffing vacancies, implementing a 5% reduction in operating
budgets, and reducing capital project spending by approximately 10–15%.
Scenario 3: 15% Decrease in Revenues
This scenario would require reductions in staffing services and/or merit increases, an 8–10%
reduction in operating budgets, and a 15–20% reduction in capital project expenditures.
Scenario 4: 20% Decrease in Revenues
Staffing reductions would be required, along with elimination or reduction of merit adjustments,
a 10–15% reduction in operating budgets, and a minimum 20% reduction in capital project
spending.
An additional option that could be considered is a temporary modification to the sales tax
allocation (shifting more to General Fund) to prioritize maintaining staffing levels, operations,
and service levels while focusing primarily on capital projects for reduction in spending.
For context, the Town has a strong history of responding quickly and effectively to changing
economic conditions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Town adopted five supplemental
appropriations that implemented budget reductions while also strategically increasing funding to
support tourism and economic development. In 2020, sales tax revenues declined by
approximately 14.1% compared to 2019, while total revenues declined by approximately 7.0%.
The Town did not utilize reserves. The following year, 2021, sales tax revenues increased 37%
with overall revenues increasing 18.0%; a record revenue year for the town. During the Great
Recession beginning in 2009, Town revenues declined by approximately 24.3% compared to
2008, with sales tax revenues declining by approximately 13.8%. The Town only utilized
reserves within the RETT Fund that year due to a contribution, with a 5-year payback, to the
Vail Recreation District. By 2011 revenues had recuperated and were back to 2008 levels.
Lodging Occupancy, Cancellation and Pacing
Occupancy
Season-to-date, Vail’s hotel segment is showing higher occupancy (+3% YoY) but at a lower
ADR (-7%), indicating hotels are using price to sustain volume in a more uncertain demand
environment. In contrast, professionally managed homes & condos are down in occupancy (-
6%) but up in ADR (+3%), reflecting a “rate-first” posture and less nimble pricing behavior.
Cancellations
An anonymous lodging pulse survey was conducted by the DMO from January 29-31. The 35
lodging-partner responses reflected a mix of inventory with 51% vacation rentals and 40%
hotel/resort properties. Most respondents reported cancellations have increased over the last 7–
10 days—37% citing a slight increase, 23% moderate, and 26% significant—while 11% saw no
change.
Cancellations appear to be happening closest to arrival date, with 46% concentrated 0–7 days
out and another 34% occurring 8–21 days out (only 11% were 22–45 days out). 91% of the
cancellations reported were due to low snow/snow conditions (91% of responses), with only a
handful mentioning flexible plans or illness/injury.
7
- 3 -
On whether cancelled guests are rebooking Vail for later dates, the most common answer was
“sometimes” (49%), followed by “rarely” (23%), with the rebook window most often landing in
February and March.
Key Data source data indicates cancelled room nights are pacing +3% YoY for Dec 1–Apr 30
arrivals, with a noted concentration of cancellations for arrivals from Dec 1 through Jan 22,
while later winter and spring plans are “mostly unchanged.” For upcoming peak windows,
performance is mixed by segment:
Christmas/New Year shows softness across both segments (hotels occ. -8% / rates -2%;
homes/condos occ. -7% / rates +4%).
President’s Week and Spring Break show hotels driving volume through lower rates whereas
homes/condos are holding with higher rates (President’s Week hotels occ. +8% / rates -8%;
Spring Break hotels occ. +33% / rates -5%) as homes/condos protect rate but give up
occupancy (President’s Week homes/condos occ. -8% / rates +7%; Spring Break
homes/condos occ. -13% / rates +7%)
Pacing
Looking ahead, near-term booking pace is softer: for the next 30 days, 46% reported being
down 1–10% YOY and 29% down 11–25%. Only 14% of properties reported being ahead. The
picture improves later in the season—31–90 days out is pacing 38% ahead, with the remainder
mostly down 1–10% (35%) or down 11–25% (26%).
Relative to western mountain resort peers, the report suggests Vail is maintaining stronger
visitation—especially in hotels—by offering lower room rates: Vail hotels are occ. +3% /
rates -7%, versus peers at occ. -13% / rates +3%, implying Vail is outperforming on volume by
leaning into price while peers hold rate with fewer visitors. Homes/condos are more in-line on
pricing (rates +3% for both Vail and peers) but Vail shows slightly softer occupancy (-6%
vs. -4%), reinforcing that the biggest competitive differentiation right now is in the hotel
segment’s price-driven occupancy strategy.
Tactical Recommendations
When lodging properties were asked what support would help most right now, respondents
prioritized sharable non-ski itineraries/event content (30%), clear and factual conditions
messaging (29%), and real-time updates on terrain, conditions and weather to combat
misinformation (20%), with demand-driving promotions/campaign amplification also noted as a
reasonable tactic (16%).
III. RECOMMENDATIONS
The Town Manager’s office and the Finance Department are evaluating capital projects that can
be delayed that do not result in losing grant dollars or create an operational/maintenance issue.
New occupancy and ADR data will be available after January, 12, 2026. Staff would propose
that we evaluate economic data at the February 3rd meeting. We could also provide any
updates needed as part of the Council retreat on 19th and 20th. As mentioned, we can rapidly
implement the above-mentioned scenarios. Since weather is a major factor in our winter
economy and is unpredictable, we will need to be nimble in responding to our local economy
and the macro and micro issues that will affect it. Again, we will hope for the best but be
prepared for uncertainty.
8
Vail Lodging Performance
Update
Analysis for December 1, 2025 through April 30, 2026 as of December
31, 2025
9
Vail Winter Lodging Performance
Hotels & Professionally Managed Homes & Condos
Season-to-date analysis for Dec. 1, 2025 through Apr. 30, 2026 as of Dec. 31, 2025.
These differences reflect how each segment responds to demand uncertainty. Hotels adjust pricing more quickly to maintain volume.
Homes and condos often prioritize rate stability due to longer stays and owner-driven pricing decisions.
+3%
Hotel
Occupancy
-7%
Hotel
Average Daily Rate
-6%
Homes & Condos
Occupancy
+3%
Homes & Condos
Average Daily Rate
Cancellation Trends: +3% in cancelled nights
Canceled room nights are pacing 3% higher YoY for arrivals Dec. 1 - Apr. 30. There's an increased concentration of cancellations for
arrivals from Dec. 1 through January 22, which likely reflects early-season uncertainty. Later winter and spring travel plans remain
mostly unchanged.
10
High Demand Periods | Looking Forward
Christmas / New Year's (Dec 19 – Jan 4)
•Hotels: Occupancy down 8% YoY, rates down 2%
•Homes & Condos: Occupancy down 7%, rates up 4%
•Takeaway: Demand softened across both segments; hotels
discounted to support occupancy, while homes/condos held
rates.
President's Week (Feb 13 – 22)
•Hotels: Occupancy up 8%, rates down 8%
•Homes & Condos: Occupancy down 8%, rates up 7%
•Takeaway: Hotels drove volume through pricing; homes/condos
are protecting rates but overall revenue is pacing mostly flat
year over year.
Spring Break (Mar 6 – 15)
•Hotels: Occupancy up 33%, rates down 5%
•Homes & Condos: Occupancy down 13%, rates up 7%
•Takeaway: Hotels captured strong demand; homes/condos
continued a rate-first strategy.
Easter (April 5th)
•Hotels: Seeing a meaningful occupancy lift from earlier Easter
timing
•Homes & Condos: Experiencing a similar Easter bump
Takeaway: Easter is a shared bright spot across lodging types due
to its early April timing.
11
How Vail Compares to Western Mountain Resort Peers
Vail maintains stronger visitation, especially in hotels, by offering lower room rates. Homes and condos largely mirror
regional trends.
Hotels: Vail vs. Peers
Vail: Occupancy up 3%, rates down 7%
Peers: Occupancy down 13%, rates up 3%
Vail hotels significantly outperform in occupancy due to
lower pricing, unlike peers who maintain rates with fewer
visitors.
Homes & Condos: Vail vs. Peers
Vail: Occupancy down 6%, rates up 3%
Peers: Occupancy down 4%, rates up 3%
Vail's homes and condos align with peer pricing but show
slightly greater occupancy softness than the regional
average.
Data is current as of Dec. 31, 2025, for arrival dates between Dec. 1, 2025, and Apr. 30, 2026. The competitive set includes Aspen, Beaver Creek, Breckenridge, Copper Mountain, Crested
Butte, Jackson Hole, Keystone, Park City, Steamboat, and Winter Park.
12
Vail Winter Lodging Pulse Survey
Reports Create your own Jotform Report - It’s free Create your own Report13
Vail Winter Lodging Pulse Survey
Lodging type?
35 Responses
0 5 10 15 20
Vacation Renta…
Hotel/Resort H…
Lodge/Inn/B&B
Other
18 51%
14 40%
2 6%
1 3%
Have cancellations increased in the past 7-10 days?
35 Responses
0 5 10 15
Slight increase
Signi cant incr…
Moderate incre…
No change
Not sure
13 37%
9 26%
8 23%
4 11%
1 3%
Reports Create your own Jotform Report - It’s free Create your own Report14
Vail Winter Lodging Pulse Survey
Where are cancellations concentrated?
35 Responses
0-7 days before arrival 8-21 days 22-45 days No clear pattern
0-7 days before arrival46%
16
8-21 days34%
12
22-45 days11%
4
No clear pattern9%
3
Top stated reasons for cancellations?
35 Responses
Low snow / snow conditions Flexible plans / changed travel dates
Illness and injury. For low snow issues, guests are rebooking to di erent dates this…
Combination of Snow and "health related"
w / snow conditions91%32
Flexible plans / chan3%
1 Illness and injury. F3%
1
Combination of Sn3%1
Reports Create your own Jotform Report - It’s free Create your own Report15
Vail Winter Lodging Pulse Survey
Are cancelled guests rebooking Vail for later dates?
35 Responses
Sometimes Rarely Not sure Often
Sometimes49%
17
Rarely23%
8
Not sure17%
6
Often11%
4
If yes, what dates?
16 Responses- 19 Empty
Data Responses
March 3
February and March 2
February/March 2
this ski season - just pushing back 1
Feb 1
Later in the Winter, February/March 1
Varies 1
moving them to dates for this winter season 1
Other entries 4
Reports Create your own Jotform Report - It’s free Create your own Report16
Vail Winter Lodging Pulse Survey
Reservation pace for the next 30 days compared to last year:
35 Responses
Down 1-10%Down 11-25%Ahead Down 25%+Not sure
Down 1-10%46%
16
Down 11-25%29%
10
Ahead14%
5
Down 25%+6%
2
Not sure6%
2
Reservation pace for 31-90 days compared to last year
34 Responses- 1 Empty
Ahead Down 1-10%Down 11-25%
Ahead38%
13
Down 1-10%35%
12
Down 11-25%26%
9
Reports Create your own Jotform Report - It’s free Create your own Report17
Vail Winter Lodging Pulse Survey
What support would help most right now?
79 Responses
Non-ski itineraries / event content to share with guests Clear, factual conditions messaging (snow, terrain, activities)Real time updates to combat misinformation
Demand-driving promotions / campaign ampli cation snow-making capabilities and forecast terrain opening based on capability
Tell Vail Resort to get the snow guns going and make snow. It's a pathetic performance.make it snow...LOL
Non-ski itineraries / event content to share with guests30%
24
Clear, factual conditions messaging (snow, terrain, activities)29%
23
Real time updates to combat misinformation20%
16 Demand-driving promotions / campaign ampli cation16%
13
snow-making capabilities and forecast terrain opening based on capa1%
1 Tell Vail Resort to get the snow guns going and make snow. It's a path1%1
make it snow...LOL1%1
Reports Create your own Jotform Report - It’s free Create your own Report18
Thank You!
Vail Winter Lodging Pulse Survey
Reports Create your own Jotform Report - It’s free Create your own Report19
Snow Summary
20
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.2
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
TIME:20 min.
SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager
ITEM TYPE:Presentation/Discussion
AGENDA SECTION:Presentation/Discussion (4:00pm)
SUBJECT:Timber Ridge Employee Housing Opportunity Discussion
(4:30pm)
SUGGESTED ACTION:Listen to presentation and provide feedback.
PRESENTER(S):Krista Miller, Human Resource and Safety and Risk Director and
Albert Zamora, Human Resources Manager
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
Timber Ridge TOV Employee Housing Council Memo_.docx
EHOP- Timber Ridge Council presentation.pptx
21
1
Town of Vail
To: Vail Town Council
From: Human Resources Department
Date: 01/06/2025
Subject: Employee Home Ownership Program (EHOP) review and Timber Ridge Ownership
Opportunities
I. SUMMARY
This memorandum provides an overview of the Town of Vail’s Employee Home Ownership Program (EHOP) and
outlines policy considerations for expanding or tailoring EHOP to support ownership opportunities for Town employees
at the Timber Ridge housing development. Two potential strategies are presented for Council direction:
1. Targeted EHOP enhancement for Timber Ridge units
2. Unit price buy-downs to align affordability with employee wages
II. BACKGROUND
The Town of Vail continues to face significant challenges in providing attainable housing for its workforce which
impacts recruitment and retention.
The Employee Home Ownership Program (EHOP) was created to help bridge this gap by offering down payment
assistance up to 20% of the purchase price (capped at $200,000). While EHOP has supported some employees in
purchasing homes, participation remains limited due to escalating housing costs and a shortage of appropriately
priced inventory.
Timber Ridge represents a major Town investment in workforce housing and a unique opportunity to create ownership
options for employees. Without additional affordability measures—such as targeted EHOP enhancements or unit price
buy-downs—many employees will remain priced out of these new units. Aligning Timber Ridge pricing and EHOP
benefits with employee wage levels would advance the Town’s strategic goals of workforce stability, recruitment, and
retention.
22
2
Town of Vail
III. DISCUSSION
EHOP Overview
EHOP currently offers two loan products:
1. Amortized Loan Product (introduced in 2025)
Assistance up to 20% of purchase price, capped at $200,000
Interest-only payments for first five years, then principal and interest
Balloon payment due at year 15
Preferred interest rate while employed; higher rate applies upon termination
Subordinate lien secured by deed of trust
2. Equity Share Loan Product
Assistance up to 20% of purchase price, capped at $200,000
No monthly payments
Repayment due upon sale, transfer, refinance, or non-owner occupancy
Town shares proportionally in appreciation at resale
Both products aim to reduce barriers to homeownership and support employee retention. However, under current
market conditions, even with EHOP assistance, ownership opportunities remain limited for many employees—
particularly for newly constructed or higher-cost units like Timber Ridge.
Enhancement Concepts for Council Consideration
Opportunity 1: Targeted EHOP Expansion for Timber Ridge Units
Increase maximum EHOP assistance for Timber Ridge units from 20% to up to 25% of purchase price
Maintain existing EHOP eligibility requirements (full-time employee, primary residence, no other in-state
ownership)
Rationale:
A targeted increase leverages the Town’s investment in Timber Ridge to bridge the affordability gap for employees.
Limiting the enhancement to Timber Ridge units controls fiscal exposure while maximizing program impact.
Opportunity 2: Buy-Down of Timber Ridge Unit Prices to Align with Employee Wages
Establish affordability targets based on Town employee wage data
Apply Town funds at the unit level to reduce initial purchase price
23
3
Town of Vail
Require owner-occupancy and resale controls to ensure long-term benefit
Rationale:
Buy-downs directly reduce monthly mortgage costs and debt-to-income ratios, making ownership feasible for a
broader range of employees. This approach positions Timber Ridge as a long-term workforce stabilization strategy.
Strategic Benefits of These Approaches
Improves recruitment and retention of Town employees
Increases utilization and effectiveness of EHOP
Aligns a significant Town capital investment with employee benefits policy
Creates a clearer ownership pathway for employees currently priced out of the market
Demonstrates proactive stewardship of workforce housing resources
IV. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL
Staff requests Council direction on whether to pursue one or both of the following concepts:
1. Targeted EHOP expansion for Timber Ridge units
2. Buy-down of Timber Ridge unit prices to align with employee wages
If Council wishes to proceed, staff will model affordability scenarios, evaluate fiscal impacts, and return with formal
policy options and recommendations.
24
4
Town of Vail
25
Timber Ridge
Opportunities
Town Council Briefing
January 6, 2025
Timber Ridge
Opportunities
Town Council Briefing
January 6, 2025
26
Current EHOP Summary
Town of Vail | Human Resources & Risk Management | vailgov.com
TOV’s Current EHOP (Employee Home Ownership Program)
2 Loan Options for TOV’s employees:
•Amortized Loan Option (new in 2025)
•15 year loan, up to 20% of purchase price
•Interest Only payments for 1st 5 years
•Equity Share Loan Option
•30 year loan, up to 20% of purchase price
•Available for purchases in Eagle County
•No monthly payments, repay with pro-rata equity
* Maximum loan is $200,000, all loans secured by deed of trust
27
New Opportunities – Timber Ridge Purchases
Town of Vail | Human Resources & Risk Management | vailgov.com
Two new options for possible exploration:
1.Targeted EHOP enhancement for Timber Ridge units.
-Allow expanded loans (IE: increase from 20%) for TR purchases
2.Unit price buy-downs to align affordability with employee wages.
-Use buy-down strategy to sell Timber Ridge units to TOV
employees
-Similar to strategy in use with Habitat for Humanity units
28
Action Requested
Town of Vail | Human Resources & Risk Management | vailgov.com
Council direction on whether to further explore:
1. Targeted EHOP expansion for Timber Ridge units.
2. Unit price buy-down strategy.
Next steps: Model affordability scenarios, evaluate fiscal
impacts, return with policy options.
29
Thank you
30
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.1
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
SUBMITTED BY:Greg Roy, Community Development
ITEM TYPE:DRB/PEC Update
AGENDA SECTION:DRB/PEC Update (4:50pm)
SUBJECT:DRB/PEC Update (5 min.)
SUGGESTED ACTION:
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
DRB Results 12-17-25.pdf
PEC Results 12-22-25.pdf
31
Design Review Board Minutes
Wednesday, December 17, 2025
2:00 PM
Vail Town Council Chambers
Present: Roland J Kjesbo
Herbert B Roth
Kit Austin
Absent: Anthony J Grandt
Mary Egan
1. Virtual Meeting Link
Register to attend Design Review Board Meetings. Once registered, you will receive
a confirmation email containing information about joining this webinar.
2. Call to Order
3. Main Agenda
3.1 DRB25-0399 - Village Inn Plaza
Final review of an addition
Address/ Legal Description: 68 East Meadow Drive/ Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1
Planner: Heather Knight
Applicant Name: Village Inn Plaza, represented by Current Architects
VillageInnPlaza-plans1.pdf
VillageInnPlaza-elevations.pdf
Roland J Kjesbo made a motion to Continue to the January 7th DRB meeting; Herbert B Roth
seconded the motion Passed (3 - 0).
3.2 DRB25-0437 - 1719 Geneva Drive LLC
Final review of a new construction
Address/ Legal Description: 1719 Geneva Drive/Lot 8B, Matterhorn Village Filing 1
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: 1719 Geneva Drive LLC Vail PBK, represented by John G Martin Architect
DRB25-0437 Plans.pdf
DRB25-0437 Docs.pdf
Roland J Kjesbo made a motion to Continue to a date uncertain; Herbert B Roth seconded the
motion Passed (3 - 0).
3.3 DRB25-0435 - Omega Vail LLC
Final review of a new construction
Address/ Legal Description: 315 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 1
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Omega Vail LLC, represented by Berglund Architects
DRB25-0435 Plans.pdf
315 Mill Creek - 3D Renderings.pdf
Design Review Board Meeting Minutes of December 17, 2025
1
32
DRB25-0435 Docs.pdf
Roland J Kjesbo made a motion to Continue to a date uncertain; Herbert B Roth seconded the
motion Passed (3 - 0).
4. Staff Approvals
4.1 DRB23-0379.002 - Red Lion
Final review of a change to approved plans (elevator shaft change)
Address/ Legal Description: 304 Bridge Street/Lot E-H, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Red Lion, represented by Pierce Austin Architects
4.2 DRB23-0390.001 - Kurtz Residence
Final review for a change to approved plans (windows)
Address/ Legal Description: 44 Willow Road 2/Lot 9, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 1
Planner: Jamie Leaman-Miller
Applicant Name: Helea M Kurtz, represented by KH Webb Architects
4.3 DRB25-0232.001 - Homestake Condos 2025
Final review of an exterior alteration (stairs)
Address/ Legal Description: 1136 Sandstone Drive/Lot A6, Block A, Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing 1
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Homestake Condos, represented by Zehren and Assoicates
4.4 DRB25-0381 - Holiday House
Final review of an exterior alteration (heat pump)
Address/ Legal Description: 9 Vail Road 4C/Lot B, Vail Village Filing 2
Planner: Heather Knight
Applicant Name: Holiday House, represented by PSI
4.5 DRB25-0432 - Terry Residence
Final review of an exterior alteration (Remodel and Conversion)
Address/ Legal Description: 1518 Spring Hill Lane East/Lot 15, Block 3, Vail Valley Filing 1
Planner: Jamie Leaman-Miller
Applicant Name: Stephen & Carine Terry, represented by Scott S Turnipseed
4.6 DRB25-0444 - Alexander Residence
Final review of an addition
Address/ Legal Description: 1460 Ridge Lane A/Ride at Vail Subdivision
Planner: Cole Michaelsen
Applicant Name: Bruce & Lisa Alexander
4.7 DRB25-0447 - Town of Vail Buzzard Park
Final review of an exterior alteration (Antenna)
Address/ Legal Description: 1329 Elkhorn Park/ Unplatted TOV Public Works Buzzard Park
Employee Housing
Planner: Cole Michaelsen
Design Review Board Meeting Minutes of December 17, 2025
2
33
Applicant Name: Town of Vail, represented by New Cingular Wireless / Ansco & Associates
5. Staff Denials
6. Adjournment
Herbert B Roth made a motion to Adjourn ; Roland J Kjesbo seconded the motion Passed (3 - 0).
Design Review Board Meeting Minutes of December 17, 2025
3
34
Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes
Monday, December 22, 2025
1:00 PM
Vail Town Council Chambers
Present: Robert N Lipnick
Brad Hagedorn
David N Tucker
Margaret H Brown
John Rediker
William A Jensen
Absent: Craig H Lintner Jr
1. Virtual Link
Register to attend the Planning and Environmental Commission meeting. Once registered,
you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining this webinar.
2. Call to Order
3. Main Agenda
3.1
A request for review of a major exterior alteration application within the Commercial Core
1 District, pursuant to Section 12-7B-7, Major Exterior Alterations or Modifications,
Title 12, Vail Town Code, to facilitate the renovations of the commercial spaces C-1 –
C-7, Red Lion Inn Condominium Building, located at 304 Bridge Street and 297 Hanson
Ranch Road/Vail Village Filing 1, Block 5A, Lots E-H. (PEC25-0041)
Planner: Heather Knight
Applicant Name: Red Lion Building LLC, represented by Ruther Associates LLC
Time: 60 Min
Red Lion Staff Memo 122225.pdf
Attachment A. Vail Village Filing 1, Block 5A, Lots E-H Vicinity
Map.pdf Attachment B. Applicant Narrative.pdf Attachment C. Plan
Set 1.pdf
Attachment D. Plan Set 2.pdf
Attachment E. Renderings.pdf
Attachment F. J&A Architects TOV Letter.pdf
Knight, Town Planner, presented Agenda Items 3.1 and 3.2. She began with a vicinity map,
identifying the Red Lion property at the intersection of Bridge Street, Hanson Ranch Road, and
Seibert Circle.
Knight explained that the Major Exterior Alteration application includes the relocation and expansion of
retail spaces toward the Bridge Street frontage, excavation of previously unexcavated lower-level
areas beneath the existing Red Lion restaurant and adjacent spaces, and conversion of those areas
into eating and drinking establishment uses with associated back-of- house functions such as kitchens
and storage. She stated that the proposal ensures there is no net loss of eating and drinking
establishment square footage.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of December 22, 2025
1
35
Knight explained that the Conditional Use Permit pertains to outdoor patio spaces serving ground-level
commercial units on the south side of the property. She stated that the proposed patios along Hanson
Ranch Road are consistent with existing conditions, that temporary patio areas authorized during
COVID-19 along Bridge Street will be removed, and that the patio extents shown represent the
maximum allowable area while maintaining emergency vehicle access.
Knight summarized key concerns raised by the Commission at the prior meeting, including internal
routing of trash and recycling, clarification of mechanical systems and venting—particularly in relation
to residential units above—accuracy of existing conditions shown on plans and elevations, whether
the building exterior would be treated cohesively, and potential impacts to residential units.
Knight stated that since the prior PEC meeting, staff and the applicant have addressed these
concerns. She explained that revisions include identification of internal trash and recycling routing for
all commercial spaces except Shakedown, updated view corridor diagrams demonstrating no
negative impacts, clarification of existing and proposed mechanical exhaust and venting locations, a
slight increase in commercial floor area to accommodate internal trash routing and reconfiguration,
and increased excavation of lower -level space to accommodate kitchen functions. She noted that
the commercial linkage obligation increased from 1.69 to 1.96 employees, that 723 square feet of
landscaping will be maintained with no net increase or decrease, and that updated renderings and
elevations now accurately reflect existing conditions.
Knight noted that at its December 16, 2025 meeting, Town Council authorized the applicant to proceed
with proposing right-of-way use for patio areas. She clarified that Town Council did not review or
approve specific patio layouts, dimensions, or designs, and that those determinations fall under
Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board review. She stated that the patio
layout presented in the packet has been reviewed and approved by Fire, Public Works, and Planning,
and that any deviation would require returning to PEC.
Knight reviewed the updated site plan and noted that existing patio dimensions for Blue Cow and Big
Bear Bistro will remain unchanged and that no encroachment into Seibert Circle is proposed due to
the tight turning radius required for fire apparatus. She highlighted a minor design change at the
southwest corner near Seibert Circle, where a continuous planter was replaced with a window and
door opening to activate the façade and break up the building massing.
Knight walked through the revised floor plans and explained that kitchen spaces for both ground-
level restaurants are now located on the lower level, that trash rooms have been repositioned to
allow direct internal access from multiple commercial units, and that Units C-3 and C-4 were
reconfigured to allow internal trash routing. She stated that Shakedown remains the only space
without internal trash routing and will continue to route trash externally via its existing stairway.
Knight confirmed that all food preparation occurs on the lower level and that dishes and materials
are transported by stair, noting that the applicant would provide additional operational detail. She
then reviewed the roof plan and mechanical routing, clarifying the location and vertical alignment of
the mechanical exhaust stack through internal spaces to the roof.
Knight reviewed the trash and delivery circulation diagram and explained that deliveries occur through
front doors consistent with existing Vail Village practices, that trash is routed internally per the
updated plans, and that trash rollout locations are clearly identified. She confirmed that no changes
are proposed to roof height, pitch, or chimney location, that view corridor protections are maintained,
and that updated renderings accurately reflect existing and proposed conditions.
Knight reviewed renderings showing the new southwest corner glazing and explained that the operable
window system improves transparency, visual interest, and street-level vibrancy consistent with the Urban
Design Guide. She also reviewed impacts to a residential unit where a deck would be enlarged due to roof
form changes, noting that residential owner approval will be required, that the change will be
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of December 22, 2025
2
36
reviewed through the Design Review Board, and that it does not require a separate PEC application.
Knight concluded her presentation and stated that she was available for questions.
Chair Rediker noted that Commissioner Hagedorn had arrived near the beginning of the meeting and
asked whether Commissioners had questions for staff prior to hearing from the applicant.
Commissioner Tucker stated that he had no questions and was ready to proceed.
Chair Rediker then invited Fire Department staff to address the Commission regarding emergency access.
Ocepek, Deputy Chief Fire Marshal, addressed the Commission and stated that Fire Protection staff
reviewed the plans and identified additional information that must be provided related to fire apparatus
turning movements. He stated that the applicant has been directed to provide those materials.
Ocepek explained that Fire Protection staff is comfortable with the application proceeding through PEC
with the understanding that additional turning movement diagrams will be required and that adjustments
may be necessary based on final verified movements. He stated that the current submittal only shows
aerial truck access from Hanson Ranch Road and emphasized the need to also demonstrate access from
Bridge Street, circulation through the top of Bridge Street, and movement through Hanson Ranch Road,
noting that this route is a critical fire access corridor for multiple buildings.
Ocepek clarified that the fountain diagram currently shown only illustrates curvature and radius and that
Fire staff still needs to verify that the aerial truck can maneuver fully around the fountain if required. He
stated that Fire Protection is comfortable allowing the application to proceed provided additional
renderings and turning movement diagrams are submitted for Design Review Board review.
Chair Rediker reviewed a proposed condition of approval requiring auto-turn diagrams for the fire
aerial truck, demonstration of approach from both Bridge Street via Gore Creek Drive and Hanson
Ranch Road, circulation around the fountain from the Gore Creek Drive entrance, and Fire Department
approval prior to Design Review Board submittal. Ocepek confirmed Fire Protection’s comfort with the
condition and added that Fire Code requires a 20-foot clear access width and that turning movements
must function within that 20-foot dimension.
Chair Rediker asked whether the condition should be amended to explicitly reference the 20-
foot requirement.
Staff responded that the 20- foot dimension is already shown on the drawings and that Fire is comfortable
with it being documented as part of the approved plan set rather than added to the condition language.
Chair Rediker thanked Ocepek for his comments.
Ruther, Ruther Associates LLC, introduced himself and the applicant team, including Jeff Selby and
Charlie Selby representing Red Lion Building LLC, as well as the project architects from Pierce
Austin Architects, Kit Austin and Reed Kildow.
Ruther thanked staff for their summary and stated that the applications before the Commission
remain unchanged in scope, consisting of a Major Exterior Alteration application and a Conditional
Use Permit intended to facilitate renovation and redevelopment of the commercial spaces within the
Red Lion building in Vail Village.
Ruther noted that a revised memorandum dated December 22, 2025, was included in the packet. He
explained that revisions to the narrative were highlighted in red to clearly show changes made in
response to Commission comments and to ensure consistency with the revised plan set. He stated
that the memorandum also walks through compliance with applicable review criteria and includes
clarifications related to proposed conditions of approval.
Ruther reviewed feedback from the prior PEC meeting and stated that the Commission generally
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of December 22, 2025
3
37
expressed support for both applications and found them consistent with the Vail Village Master Plan
and Town of Vail zoning regulations. He emphasized that the Planning and Environmental
Commission and Town Council recently adopted an amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan,
Resolution No. 50, Series of 2025, which specifically addresses redevelopment of the Red Lion
property. He stated that the amendment emphasizes street life, activity, vibrancy, and vitality given the
building’s prominent location in the center of Vail Village.
Ruther stated that while overall support was expressed, the Commission requested additional
clarification related to site logistics, including trash and recycling operations, mechanical systems and
venting, kitchen locations, and internal circulation. He stated that the Commission also requested a
more complete and accurate set of plans reflecting existing and proposed conditions.
Ruther explained that the applicant team spent the past two weeks coordinating with nearby residential
owners and their architectural representatives to confirm existing conditions, identify potential impacts to
residential units, and avoid unintended consequences. He stated that while the Red Lion is and has
always been a mixed-use building, the Commission expressed interest in treating the building more
cohesively from a design standpoint, despite the scope being limited to commercial renovations.
Ruther reviewed key design updates, noting that the most significant change is at the southwest
corner of the building, which is highly visible from the fountain and from pedestrian traffic traveling to
and from the mountain. He stated that additional floor-to-ceiling glazing is proposed at this corner to
improve transparency, street activation, and visual connection to public spaces.
Ruther explained that existing outdoor patio seating along Hanson Ranch Road will remain, while patio
seating currently located along Bridge Street will be removed. He stated that removal of the Bridge
Street patios allowed for the revised glazing and landscape configuration while maintaining compliance
with Town Code requirements.
Ruther emphasized that the project maintains 723 square feet of landscape area, consistent with
existing conditions. He stated that the applicant intentionally avoided increasing landscape area
beyond existing levels to prevent the need for a future variance, and confirmed that the proposal
complies with the Town’s requirement for no net loss of landscaping.
Ruther explained that renovations are focused entirely on the commercial spaces. No changes are
proposed to residential units. He discussed a residential deck that was previously highlighted, stating
that it could be enlarged if desired by the residential owner, but that no expansion is required. He
stated that the applicant met with the unit owner and confirmed that the roofline could instead be
reframed to align with existing conditions if the deck is not expanded.
Ruther discussed the excavation of the lower level to create two new commercial spaces, noting that this
supports long-standing Town goals for below-grade entertainment uses in Vail Village. He stated that
kitchen spaces have been relocated to the lower level and that mechanical systems are being updated.
Ruther explained that the existing mechanical chase will remain in its current location, size, and
configuration. He stated that while the team is open to future improvements or relocation of the
chase through collaboration with residential owners, the existing configuration complies with all
adopted Town codes and standards and is the most practical solution at this time.
Ruther discussed outdoor dining and right-of-way use, noting that Town Council authorized use of a portion
of the public right-of-way. He stated that while there is public interest in expanding outdoor dining, the
applicant understands the need to comply with Town Code and life- safety requirements. He emphasized
that the current proposal does not seek additional outdoor dining beyond what is permitted.
Ruther reviewed development statistics, stating that the employee housing requirement increased
to 1.96 employees due to the additional commercial square footage. He confirmed that no parking
is required under Town Code and stated that the project aligns with Vail Village Master Plan
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of December 22, 2025
4
38
recommendations.
Ruther explained that while exterior materials are not changing, notes were added to the plans
indicating that existing trim will be painted to match adjacent trim to create a more unified appearance.
He stated that additional exterior improvements could be considered with HOA approval.
Ruther reviewed updated site coverage figures, noting a slight increase of approximately 90 square
feet related primarily to an elevator addition. He stated that overall site coverage is reduced from
approximately 85% to 81%, establishing a new baseline consistent with Town Code requirements.
Ruther discussed trash and recycling operations, explaining that internal routing has been clarified.
He described how trash from the Shakedown Bar can be moved internally from the lower level up the
stairs and then routed back through interior spaces to the expanded trash room without going
outdoors. He stated that loading and delivery operations remain unchanged and consistent with
typical Vail Village practices.
Ruther confirmed that view corridor protections were re-evaluated and that no impacts are proposed.
He discussed coordination with residential owners regarding roof connections and stated that the
proposed solution respects both structural design and view corridor requirements.
Ruther reviewed proposed and existing east- and west- facing elevations, pointing out the existing
vertical wood- sided mechanical vent stack, which will remain in its current location. He explained that
while future relocation could be explored during engineering, the current proposal maintains existing
conditions to ensure code compliance related to setbacks and venting requirements.
Ruther clarified that the agenda also includes a landscape variance application, which the applicant
intends to request be tabled if it is not needed, to avoid unnecessary delay or republication.
Ruther reviewed compliance with the Vail Village Master Plan, Commercial Core 1 zone district
standards, the Vail Comprehensive Plan, and the Urban Design Guide Plan. He stated that the
application meets all applicable criteria and does not adversely affect neighborhood character.
Ruther discussed Conditional Use Permit criteria, noting that outdoor dining decks are proposed in
long-standing existing locations with no history of violations. He stated that the applicant will execute
all required right-of-way agreements with the Town if the permit is approved.
Ruther asked for clarification regarding the required fire apparatus turning movement
diagrams, specifically whether routing around the fountain would occur on the north or south
side when approaching from Bridge Street.
Ruther concluded by stating that the applications comply with adopted criteria, Town development goals,
and the recent moratorium and Master Plan amendments aimed at enhancing street life, vibrancy, and the
guest experience in Vail Village. He stated that the applicant team is available to answer questions.
Chair Rediker opened the floor for Commissioner questions to the applicant.
Lipnick asked whether the two required employees associated with the commercial linkage
obligation would be housed at Timber Ridge.
Ruther responded that housing the employees at Timber Ridge is the expectation. He stated that
the applicant has been in contact with Timber Ridge staff and is actively pursuing acquisition of a
two-bedroom unit to meet the requirement.
Jensen asked for clarification regarding the 1.96 commercial linkage calculation, noting that while the
project includes a single kitchen, the overall commercial space is substantial and the number
appeared light given the change in use.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of December 22, 2025
5
39
Ruther responded that the linkage calculation is fully detailed in the written narrative submitted with
the application.
Knight added that the Town’s Housing Department reviewed and verified the linkage calculations
and confirmed that staff is confident the numbers are correct.
Jensen raised concerns regarding the east side of the building, stating that despite internal
routing improvements, the exterior trash and service conditions appear largely unchanged from
historical conditions, particularly given increased seating, recycling, and trash generation.
Ruther explained that many redevelopment projects in Vail Village—particularly larger projects—are
able to fully internalize back -of-house operations by accessing space beneath buildings. He stated
that this building does not have that same configuration and that the northeast corner remains the
most functional location for back-of-house uses given existing constraints.
Austin explained that the current trash doors are often left open and that the proposal includes
enclosing the trash area with an overhead rolling door that remains closed when not in use, along with
a secured man door. He stated that an existing gate will be repaired or replaced and that the trash
area will no longer function as a gathering or smoking area. He noted that the trash room is being
enlarged and fully enclosed, representing a significant operational improvement.
Rediker asked for confirmation that the rolling door would remain closed except when dumpsters
are being moved.
Austin confirmed that the intent is to keep the area closed and secured, stating that the design
will discourage loitering and make the space quieter and more controlled.
Tucker asked how kitchen deliveries will occur now that both the Red Lion restaurant kitchen and
the event space kitchen are located in the basement.
Austin responded that all deliveries will occur from Hanson Ranch Road and Bridge Street, entering
through the front of the building via the Red Lion space. He stated that this approach avoids residential
disturbance and that the only activity near residential areas would be trash movement during pickup.
Austin added that the applicant is considering installation of a dumbwaiter or elevator to facilitate
movement of goods to the basement kitchens, noting that these logistics will be refined in
coordination with future operators.
Hagedorn asked whether the chimney height and ridge lines are changing with the proposed project.
Austin responded that the proposed changes result in an improvement for residential units, noting
that overall roof heights are not increasing.
Kildow explained that additional investigation revealed a previously undocumented window and
balcony condition that had not been reflected accurately in earlier drawings.
Hagedorn asked for clarification regarding the roof forms shown in the updated materials.
Austin explained that the updated 3D renderings show that the proposed roof is actually lower than
existing conditions. He stated that the revised design does not interface with residential roofs and
avoids overlapping rooflines. He further explained that a previously hidden enclosed balcony is now
accurately shown and that the proposed roof configuration does not interfere with it.
Rediker returned to the applicant’s earlier comments regarding uncertainty about fire access
conditions and asked staff to review them.
Knight pulled up the site plan and fire access diagrams included in the submitted plan set.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of December 22, 2025
6
40
Ruther explained that his uncertainty related to the path of fire vehicle access around the
fountain, specifically whether circulation was required on one side or both sides of the fountain.
Ocepek, Deputy Chief Fire Marshal, explained that Fire Protection requires verification of aerial fire truck
access from multiple directions, including approaches from both Hanson Ranch Road and Bridge Street.
He stated that the intent is to ensure the truck can circulate around the fountain without swinging into the
building or other obstructions. He emphasized that the request is for confirmation through turning
movement diagrams and that Fire Protection believes the access will work once verified.
Rediker asked whether the applicant plans to tie the new construction into the existing
residential portions of the building through exterior treatments.
Ruther responded that the proposal focuses on unifying the building through consistent trim
treatment, which he described as the most visually prominent element. He stated that broader
exterior painting would require additional coordination with the HOA.
Chair Rediker asked whether there were any additional questions from Commissioners, including
those attending virtually.
No further questions were raised.
Chair Rediker thanked the applicant team for their responses.
Dana Tang, a residential owner at the Red Lion, addressed the Commission and expressed general
support for the project while raising ongoing concerns related to increased commercial intensity and
its impacts on residential units. She noted that residential owners have consistently raised concerns
since spring 2025 regarding trash operations, noise, mechanical systems, and coordination with
residential interests, and that many of those concerns were not fully addressed until the Commission
requested clarification at the prior meeting.
Ms. Tang stated that the revised plans reflect a significant increase in commercial space due to
excavation of previously unexcavated lower-level areas, which she estimated results in approximately
a 40 percent increase in commercial square footage. She noted that this expansion has implications
for occupancy, trash generation, deliveries, and noise. She referenced the fire egress plans showing
a high occupancy load and expressed concern that increased occupancy would result in additional
trash volume, bottle disposal, and operational impacts beneath residential bedrooms.
Ms. Tang acknowledged improvements to internal trash routing but raised concern that some routes
pass through separate tenant spaces, which may not be viable long-term if spaces are separately
leased. She questioned whether the expanded trash room and additional cart capacity would be
sufficient given the increased commercial intensity and noted the absence of a detailed trash study.
She expressed concern about potential spillover impacts to the adjacent alley and Gore Creek area.
Ms. Tang also raised concerns regarding noise impacts from food and beverage uses beneath
residential units, including trash movement and bottle dumping. She requested that the Commission
consider requiring sound mitigation measures beyond minimum code requirements, including
enhanced sound isolation and improved acoustic windows for bedrooms adjacent to service areas.
She further requested coordination between the applicant and residential owners regarding
mechanical systems, particularly in light of a previously approved residential expansion that includes
modifications to the mechanical chase.
Ms. Tang addressed conditions related to condominium documents and suggested that required
approvals and coordination occur prior to issuance of a building permit, rather than after construction,
to avoid disputes and potential delays. She concluded by requesting continued collaboration between
the applicant and residential owners and thanked the Commission.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of December 22, 2025
7
41
Oscar Tang, a residential owner, addressed the Commission and provided background on the
development of the residential portion of the Red Lion. He expressed concern regarding food and
beverage uses with live music located beneath residential bedrooms and noted that previous
design decisions intentionally separated entertainment uses from residential areas. He stated that
additional sound mitigation may be necessary to address impacts to existing residential units.
Brian Judge, appearing virtually on behalf of residential owners, expressed general support for the
project but raised concerns regarding unresolved issues related to trash handling, sound and vibration
mitigation, and the east-side alley. He stated that the increase in commercial square footage and
occupancy warrants a more detailed evaluation of trash generation and service impacts. He
emphasized that the east alley functions as a pedestrian -oriented residential access and expressed
concern that increased service activity could degrade its character.
Mr. Judge suggested that alternative trash handling methods and operational controls be explored to
reduce noise and impacts. He also raised concerns regarding inconsistencies in residential height and
GRFA calculations included in the application materials, noting that no residential changes are
proposed. He encouraged continued collaboration between the applicant and residential owners to
resolve outstanding issues.
Chair Rediker closed public comment after confirming that no additional speakers were present.
Rediker opened Commissioner questions, noting a few items for staff and the applicant.
Rediker asked whether there is an agreement in place regarding noise from below that impacts
the residential units above the Red Lion restaurant.
Ruther and staff responded that they were unaware of any current agreement.
Jeff Selby, representing the applicant, explained that approximately 30 years ago there was a dispute
between the restaurant and residential units, which was resolved through a court-filed settlement or
mediation. Soundproofing and insulation were installed in the western portion of the building at that time.
Rediker asked whether the 2016 approval for residential expansion on the north side of the building
is still valid.
Staff responded that DRB approvals without a specified timeframe may still be applicable. Any
mechanical modifications needed for the residential units would need coordination between the
parties. Exterior alteration approvals from 2016 would no longer be valid.
Rediker asked whether the condo map adjustment condition could be modified to occur prior to
issuance of the building permit rather than after.
Staff explained that it is common practice to wait until construction is complete and the as-built space
is surveyed before adjusting the condo map.
Rediker asked about soundproofing and whether the applicant plans to meet or exceed
code requirements.
The applicant team responded that they will work with sound consultants to meet or exceed STC
ratings per IBC Section 1207.2, focusing on the new restaurant space on the first floor.
Rediker asked whether there were any additional questions from commissioners, including
those attending virtually.
No further questions were raised.
Chair Rediker opened Commissioner comment.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of December 22, 2025
8
42
Commissioner Hagedorn stated that the updated plans showing accurate elevations and building height
were helpful. He emphasized that interior trash routing is critical and should be maintained regardless of
tenancy, noting that routing trash through residential entrances is not standard practice. He encouraged
the applicant to exceed the minimum IBC sound transmission requirements between commercial and
residential spaces, suggesting a target of STC 60. Commissioner Hagedorn observed that private
agreements regarding the location of music beneath residential units are outside the Commission’s
purview, but noted that a similar approach could be considered for new spaces. He also stated that
structural support and construction means and methods are outside the Commission’s authority and that
certification by a structural engineer is expected. He expressed overall support for the application.
Commissioner Jensen stated that he agreed with the importance of interior trash routing and enhanced
soundproofing. He emphasized that internal routing should be memorialized to ensure it remains in place
for future tenants. He observed that peak trash volumes may exceed average conditions, but noted that
trash frequency and proper disposal should be managed through code enforcement. He encouraged
soundproofing beyond code minimums and expressed support for the application.
Commissioner Lipnick stated that he appreciated the applicant’s efforts to address concerns. He
expressed support for the interior routing of trash and for careful consideration of music location
beneath residential units, and stated his support for the application.
Commissioner Hanlon thanked the applicant for responding quickly to Commission concerns. She
noted that construction standards and HOA negotiations fall outside the Commission’s purview, but
encouraged prompt coordination to avoid delays in issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. She
highlighted the applicant’s careful consideration of building density and context and stated that this
approach supports the project’s long-term success.
Commissioner Tucker thanked the applicant for proposing solutions related to trash and mechanical
concerns. He noted his prior personal experience with mixed-use building operations and noise
issues and expressed support for the application.
Commissioner Rediker thanked the applicant team and the Tang family for their public comments. He
acknowledged ongoing issues related to trash, noise, and mechanical systems, noting that mechanical use
itself is not actively under review. He expressed appreciation for the interior rerouting of trash and
encouraged coordination between tenants and lease agreements to ensure long-term functionality. He
encouraged the applicant to exceed code minimums for soundproofing to prevent potential disputes.
Commissioner Rediker observed that the application complies with the purposes of the commercial core,
applicable Town plans, and the Urban Design Guide. He noted the importance of balancing outdoor
seating, code compliance, and safety circulation and expressed support for the application.
Hagedorn stated that it is important to condition that the internal trash routing be memorialized as part
of the approval, noting that this matter is within the Commission’s purview. He explained that the
project shows two separate units that will be platted, and it is critical that internal access for trash
disposal is maintained regardless of ownership.
Rediker asked Hagedorn to clarify how he would like the condition to read.
Hagedorn suggested that the condition could require that internal trash routing either be documented
in the CC&Rs because it passes through two different units, or be maintained such that internal
routing is preserved even if the units have separate ownership.
Planner Knight asked for clarification on Hagedorn’s objectives and noted that while coordination
between private parties is outside the Commission’s direct authority, the Commission can address
internal trash routing under the service and delivery criteria. Knight emphasized that the internal
routing is already shown on the submitted plans and is not a departure from what was presented.
Hagedorn responded that referencing the approved set of plans would ensure compliance with the
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of December 22, 2025
9
43
routing shown. He suggested that the condition could tie approval of the major exterior alteration to
adherence to the routing as shown on the plans. He noted that referencing the plans is preferable to
relying on amendments to CC&Rs, which could be changed without the Town’s oversight.
Greg Roy, Planner, proposed wording for the condition stating that the internal trash routing is
maintained as documented on the approved plan set to ensure internal access to the trash area.
Hagedorn agreed that the proposed wording captures the intent of the condition.
Jensen acknowledged agreement with the proposed condition, noting he was not the author.
William A Jensen made a motion to Approve with the conditions noted on pages 15 and 16 and the
findings on pages 16 and 17 of the staff memo. There is an additional condition noted that the
internal trash routing is maintained as documented on the plan set page A0.16 to ensure internal
access to the trash area.; Brad Hagedorn seconded the motion Passed (6 - 0).
3.2
A request for review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Chapter 12- 16,
Conditional Use Permit, Title 12, Vail Town Code, to allow for an outdoor patio at the
Red Lion Inn Condominium Building in accordance with Section 12- 7B-3 Permitted
And Conditional Uses; First Floor or Street Level, located at 304 Bridge Street and
297 Hanson Ranch Road/Vail Village Filing 1, Block 5A, Lots E-H. (PEC25-0039)
See staff memo and attachments from item 3.1
Planner: Heather Knight
Applicant Name: Red Lion Building LLC, represented by Ruther Associates LLC
Time: 30 Min
Heard concurrently with item 3.1, please refer to 3.1 notes.
William A Jensen made a motion to Approve with conditions on pages 17 and 18 and findings on
page 18 of the staff memo.; Robert N Lipnick seconded the motion Passed (6 - 0).
3.3
A request for review of a variance from Section 12-7B-16, Landscaping and Site
Development, pursuant to Chapter 17, Variances, Title 12, Vail Town Code, to allow for
a reduction in the existing landscape area at the Red Lion Inn Condominium Building,
located at 304 Bridge Street and 297 Hanson Ranch Road/Vail Village Filing 1, Block
5A, Lots E-H. (PEC25-0040)
Planner: Heather Knight
Applicant Name: Red Lion Building LLC, represented by Ruther Associates LLC
Time: 30 Min
Brad Hagedorn made a motion to Table until the January 26, 2026 PEC meeting.; David N
Tucker seconded the motion Passed (6 - 0).
3.4 A request for review of a Conditional Use Permit amendment, pursuant to Section 12-6H-
3 Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, in accordance with Title 12, Chapter 16, Conditional
Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow for timeshare units, located at Located at 442
South Frontage Road East/ Vail Village Filing 5, Tract D. (PEC25-0024)
The applicant has requested that this item be tabled to the January 26th PEC meeting.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of December 22, 2025
10
44
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC represented by Ruther Associates LLC
Time: 5 Min
William A Jensen made a motion to Table to the January 26, 2026 PEC meeting.; Brad
Hagedorn seconded the motion Passed (6 - 0).
4. Approval of Minutes
4.1 PEC Minutes 12-8-25
PEC Results 12-8-25.pdf
William A Jensen made a motion to Approve ; David N Tucker seconded the motion Passed (6 - 0).
5. Information Update
6. Adjournment
Brad Hagedorn made a motion to Adjourn ; William A Jensen seconded the motion Passed
(6 - 0).
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of December 22, 2025
11
45
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.1
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
SUBMITTED BY:Jake Shipe
ITEM TYPE:Information Update
AGENDA SECTION:Information Update (4:55pm)
SUBJECT:December 2025 Revenue Update
SUGGESTED ACTION:
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
260106 Town of Vail Revenue Update.pdf
46
1
TOWN OF VAIL
REVENUE U PDATE
January 6, 202 5
4.0% General Sales Tax
Upon receipt of all sales tax returns, November 2025 collections are estimated to
be $1,787,285, down (3.1)% from 2024 and down (3.1)% from the budget.
2025 YTD collections of $37,376,756 are up 2.7% from 2024 and up 3.0% from
the budget. Inflation as measured by the consumer price index was up 2.7% for
the 12-months ending November 2025. The annual budget totals $42.1 million.
0.5% Housing Fund Sales Tax
Upon receipt of all sales tax returns, November 2025 collections of the 0.5%
housing sales tax are estimated to be $215,550, down (3.2)% from 2024 and down
(5.7)% from the budget. 2025 YTD collections of $4,533,302 are up 2.8% from
2024 and up 1% from the budget. The annual budget for the housing fund sales
tax totals $5.2 million.
Real Estate Transfer Tax (RETT)
RETT collections through December 30 total $9,318,891, down (0.3)% from 2024.
The number of property sales (excluding time-shares) is tracking down (3.7)% from
2024, while the average collection amount is up 3.7%. The proposed amended
budget for RETT collections totals $8.9 million for 2025.
Construction Use Tax
Use Tax collections through December 30 total $2,384,950 compared to
$3,073,318 in 2024. The budget totals $2.5 million for 2025.
Lift Tax
Lift tax collections through November 2025 total $5,678,003, up 2.2% or $126,848
from November 2024. The budget totals $6,915,427.
Daily Parking Sales
Daily sales from the parking structures from November through December 29th
total approximately $1,382,100, down (5.3)% from time last year. This amount
includes daily fees charged to the parking pass holders. The number of daily
parking transactions is down 14.2% compared to the prior year, however the
majority of that reduction is being offset by daily parking fee increases.
Winter Parking Pass Sales
Winter parking pass sales for the 2025 – 2026 season through December 29th total
approximately $1,158,170, a decrease of $(45,974) or (3.8)% from the prior
season. Adjustments to the pass pricing structure were approved for the 2025-
2026 season. If prices had not been increased (and the same number of passes
were sold), collections would have been down approximately ($107,756), or (8.9)%
from the prior season due the decrease in employee plus passes sold The tot al
budget for Winter parking pass sales is $1,240,000.
47
2
The number of passes sold by type is included in the following chart :
Summary
Across all funds and excluding one-time grants and reimbursements, year-to-date
total revenue of $93.5 million is up 1.5% from the amended budget and is down
(2.3)% from the prior year. Real estate transfer tax collections, interest earnings,
use tax collections, and sales tax collections are pacing above budget, while
parking fee collections are below budget. Compared to the prior year, sales tax
and parking fee collections have increased, while interest earnings, use tax
collections, and parking fees have decreased.
Pass Type
2025 - 2026
Pass Sales
2024 – 2025
Pass Sales
Increase /
(Decrease)
from Prior
Year
Premier 20 20 -
Vail Village Business Premier 70 69 1
Lionshead Business Premier 4 7 (3)
Employee 475 471 4
Employee Plus 265 329 (64)
Local 3,595 3,247 349
Total 4,429 4,143 287
48
2025 Budget % change % change
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Budget Variance from 2024 from Budget
January 4,076,145$ 3,422,209$ 5,217,125$ 5,911,572$ 5,805,199$ 5,791,927$ 5,965,178$ 173,251$ 2.76% 2.99%
February 4,285,633 3,691,850 5,686,585 6,041,108 6,080,349 6,063,693 6,292,923 229,230 3.50% 3.78%
March 2,243,518 4,364,797 5,912,059 6,055,992 6,412,535 6,162,148 6,244,416 82,268 -2.62% 1.34%
April 427,518 1,751,528 2,234,296 2,264,892 1,842,893 2,082,859 2,188,794 105,935 18.77% 5.09%
May 503,828 1,061,516 1,227,974 1,118,011 1,176,629 1,152,860 1,204,497 51,637 2.37% 4.48%
June 1,023,517 2,149,312 2,317,931 2,272,457 2,361,482 2,355,770 2,350,166 (5,604) -0.48% -0.24%
July 2,084,644 3,491,668 3,507,973 3,412,277 3,643,192 3,629,309 3,718,933 89,624 2.08% 2.47%
August 2,138,838 2,877,550 2,997,389 2,932,111 3,052,213 3,038,643 3,253,722 215,079 6.60% 7.08%
September 1,767,393 2,359,528 2,441,331 2,508,064 2,415,397 2,414,174 2,526,039 111,865 4.58% 4.63%
October 1,371,727 1,734,964 1,729,558 1,773,358 1,753,419 1,752,419 1,844,802 92,383 5.21% 5.27%
November 1,425,461 1,880,397 1,902,643 1,901,141 1,844,461 1,843,961 1,787,285 (56,676) -3.10% -3.07%
YTD 21,348,222$ 28,785,318$ 35,174,864$ 36,190,983$ 36,387,768$ 36,287,763$ 37,376,756$ 1,088,993$ 2.72% 3.00%
December 3,625,189 5,749,365 5,602,018 5,811,950 5,789,893 5,776,237 -
Total 24,973,411$ 34,534,683$ 40,776,882$ 42,002,933$ 42,177,661$ 42,064,000$ 37,376,756$ 1,088,993$ 2.72%3.00%
2025 Budget % change % change
2022 2023 2024 Budget Variance from 2024 from Budget
January 645,487$ 720,906$ 705,167$ 711,525$ 726,115$ 14,590$ 2.97% 2.05%
February 702,730 736,788 741,549 753,337 766,919 13,582 3.42% 1.80%
March 719,717 738,244 783,123 769,644 762,797 (6,847) -2.60% -0.89%
April 269,018 271,930 222,032 249,107 263,957 14,850 18.88% 5.96%
May 146,657 132,333 139,793 143,483 143,737 254 2.82% 0.18%
June 280,460 275,113 284,485 291,846 283,500 (8,346) -0.35% -2.86%
July 424,602 412,849 439,142 448,039 448,582 543 2.15% 0.12%
August 361,165 352,887 369,212 377,205 393,814 16,609 6.66% 4.40%
September 294,861 304,068 293,066 299,772 306,460 6,688 4.57% 2.23%
October 207,397 213,568 210,364 217,051 221,872 4,821 5.47% 2.22%
November 230,383 229,092 222,639 228,495 215,550 (12,945) -3.18% -5.67%
YTD 4,282,477$ 4,387,778$ 4,410,572$ 4,489,504$ 4,533,302$ 43,798$ 2.78% 0.98%
December 671,982 703,050 699,750 712,030 -
Total 4,954,459$ 5,090,828$ 5,110,322$ 5,201,534$ 4,533,302$ 43,798$ 2.78% 0.98%
0.5% HOUSING SALES TAX
2025 Budget Comparison
4.0% Collected
Sales Tax
Actual 0.5% Collections 0.5% Collected
Sales Tax
Town of Vail Revenue Update
January 6, 2026
4.0% GENERAL SALES TAX
2025 Budget Comparison
Actual 4.0% Collections
49
Through November 30
November 4% General Sales Tax Collections By Year
Through November 30
Town of Vail Revenue Update
YTD 4% General Sales Tax Collections By Year
January 6, 2026
•November collections of $1,787,285 are down (3.1)% from prior year and are down (3.1)% from the
budget.
$1,880,397
$1,902,643
$1,901,141
$1,844,461
$1,787,285
$0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
$28,785,318
$35,174,864
$36,190,983
$36,387,768
$37,376,756
$0 $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 $35,000,000
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
•YTD collections of $37,376,756 are up 2.7% from prior year and are up 3.0% from the budget.
•Inflation as measured by the consumer price index was up 2.7% for the 12-months ending November
50
November Collections YTD Collections
Town of Vail Revenue Update
January 6, 2026
November 0.5% Housing Fund Sales Tax Collections By Year
Real Estate Transfer Tax by Year
YTD Through December 2025
•This chart shows YTD collections of 1% RETT, segmented by real property values. 2025
collections are down (0.3)% from the prior year.
$13,371,555
$9,603,456
$7,994,852
$9,349,910 $9,318,891
$0
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Sales Less Than $2.5 Million Sales $2.5 to $5 Million Sales $5 to $10 Million Sales Over $10 Million
•November collections of $215,550 are down (3.2)% from prior year and are down (5.7)% from the
budget.
•2025 YTD collections of $4,533,302 are up 2.8% from 2024 and up 1.0% from the budget. The
annual budget for the housing fund sales tax totals $5.2 million.
$230,383 $229,092 $222,639 $215,550
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
2022 2023 2024 2025
$4,282,477 $4,387,778 $4,410,572 $4,533,302
$0
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$4,000,000
$4,500,000
$5,000,000
2022 2023 2024 2025
51
Town of Vail Revenue Update
January 6, 2026
Construction Use Tax by Year
YTD Through December 2025
YTD Lift Tax Collections
YTD Through November 2025
•Use Tax collections through December 30 total $2,384,950 compared to $3,073,318 from this
time last year. This is a decrease of (22.4)%.
$3,682,745
$2,189,830
$2,532,881
$3,073,318
$2,384,950
$0
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$4,000,000
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
•2025 YTD lift tax collections of $5,678,003 are up 2.2% or $124,848 from the same time last
year.
$4,587,835
$5,424,419
$5,295,602
$5,553,154
$5,678,003
$0 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
52
Vail Business Review
November 2025
January 6, 2026
The Vail Business Review breaks down the 4.5% sales tax collected for the month of
November. The 4.5% sales tax includes the town’s general 4% sales tax and the 0.5%
housing sales tax supported by Town of Vail voters during the November 2021 election,
effective January 1, 2022. The housing sales tax sunsets on December 31, 2051.
November 4.5% sales tax was down (3.0)% from the prior year. Retail decreased
(6.0)%, lodging decreased (0.6)%, food and beverage increased 0.6%, and
utilities/other decreased (3.0)%. Excluding the out-of-town category, sales tax for the
month of November was down (3.7)% compared to prior year.
Town of Vail sales tax reports, the Vail Business Review, and financial statements are
available on the internet at vail.gov. You may email me to request to have the Vail
Business Review emailed to you automatically.
Please remember when reading the Vail Business Review that it is produced from sales
tax collections as opposed to actual gross sales.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call me at (970) 479-2125 or
Carlie Smith, Finance Director, at (970) 479-2119.
Sincerely,
Lauren Noll
Revenue Manager
53
Town of Vail Business Review
November Sales Tax Collections by Year
November 2025 Sales Tax
November 2024
Sales Tax Collections by Business Type
November 2025
847,578
Lodging
599,860
Food &
Beverage
382,113
Utilities &
Other
169,899
$0
$150,000
$300,000
$450,000
$600,000
$750,000
$900,000
(6.0)% 0.6%
(3.0)%
Retail
1,884,907
2,131,909
2,133,850
2,060,151
1,999,450
$0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
General Sales Tax
Housing Sales Tax
• November 2025 retail sales decreased (6.0)%, lodging decreased (0.6)%, food and beverage
increased 0.6%, and utilities and other decreased (3.0)%.
• The figures above reflect 4.5% sales tax.
Retail
901,759
Lodging
603,469
Food &
Beverage
379,677
Utilities &
Other
175,247
$0
$150,000
$300,000
$450,000
$600,000
$750,000
$900,000
(0.6)%
• This report represents collections of Town of Vail sales tax, as opposed to actual gross sales.
• On January 1st, 2022, Town of Vail sales tax increased from 4.0% to 4.5% on all items except food for
home consumption. 2022-2025 above include the 0.5% increase to sales tax, depicted in light blue.
2021 shows 4.0% sales tax collections.
• Total November 2024 collections were $2,060,151; November 2025 collections were $1,999,450, down
from the prior year (3.0)%.
54
Town of Vail Business Review
November 2024November 2025
Geographic Area Trends by Year
November Sales Tax
Sales Tax by Location
November 2025 Sales Tax
Other Areas
13%
Lionshead
10%
Out of
Town
44%
Vail Village
33%
• Vail Village sales tax increased 2.7%, Lionshead decreased (17.0)%, Other Areas decreased (9.1)%, and
Out of Town decreased (2.1)%. Excluding Out of Town collections, all areas were down (3.7)%.
• The figures above reflect 4.5% sales tax.
235,269
285,087
212,252
231,525
770,297
921,438
667,089
693,858
$0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 $800,000 $900,000
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Vail Village
Out of Town
Lionshead
Other Areas
922,280
735,433
207,677
268,460
• This chart shows November sales tax collections by geographic area over time.
• 2022-2025 include the 0.5% increase for housing sales tax, depicted in lighter shades. General
4.0% sales tax collections are shown in darker shades.
268,166
210,121 913,099
668,766
686,947
174,341 894,273
243,889
Other Areas
12%
Lionshead
9%
Out of
Town
45%
Vail Village
34%
55
Retail Business 4.5% Sales Tax Detail
November 2025 Sales Tax
Town of Vail Business Review
Accommodation Services Sales Tax by Year
Apparel
$133,099
Grocery
$105,720
Gallery
$7,387
Gifts
$4,323
Jewelry
$42,801
Retail Liquor
$28,731Retail Other
$312,161
Sporting Goods
$100,064
Online Retailers
$113,142
Retail Home
Occupation
$151
• November 2025 accommodations services decreased (0.6)% from the prior year. Short-term rentals increased
6.7% and hotels and lodges decreased (6.6)%.
• The figures above reflect 4.5% sales tax.
• Short-term rental sales tax collection numbers include online marketplace facilitators like Airbnb and VRBO.
Revenue collections from facilitators may include some hotels and lodges that advertise and rent properties on
these platforms.
318,085
252,708
332,159
271,310
310,378
289,483
$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000
Hotel and Lodges
Short-Term Rentals
2025 2024 2023
56
Retail 124,631 135,366 (10,735) -7.93%
Lodging 63,332 70,297 (6,965) -9.91%
F & B 53,149 59,899 (6,750) -11.27%
Other 2,777 2,604 173 6.65%
Total 243,889 268,166 (24,276) -9.05%
Retail 58,683 70,070 (11,387) -16.25%
Lodging 68,068 81,400 (13,331) -16.38%
F & B 47,133 56,806 (9,673) -17.03%
Other 458 1,845 (1,388) -75.21%
Total 174,341 210,121 (35,779) -17.03%
Retail 396,503 433,868 (37,365) -8.61%
Lodging 335,274 311,569 23,705 7.61%
F & B 335 484 (149) -30.77%
Other 162,161 167,178 (5,017) -3.00%
Total 894,273 913,099 (18,826) -2.06%
Retail 267,761 262,454 5,307 2.02%
Lodging 133,186 140,204 (7,018) -5.01%
F & B 281,496 262,488 19,008 7.24%
Other 4,504 3,621 883 24.40%
Total 686,947 668,766 18,181 2.72%
Retail 847,578 901,759 (54,181) -6.01%
Lodging 599,860 603,469 (3,609) -0.60%
F & B 382,113 379,677 2,436 0.64%
Other 169,899 175,247 (5,348) -3.05%
Total 1,999,450 2,060,151 (60,701) -2.95%
Retail Apparel 133,099 142,876 (9,777) -6.84%
Retail Food 105,720 113,334 (7,614) -6.72%
Retail Gallery 7,387 10,792 (3,405) -31.55%
Retail Gift 4,323 3,154 1,169 37.05%
Retail Home Occupation 151 206 (55) -26.92%
Retail Jewelry 42,801 14,240 28,561 200.57%
Retail Liquor 28,731 31,220 (2,489) -7.97%
Retail Other 312,161 354,837 (42,676) -12.03%
Retail Sport 100,064 129,012 (28,948) -22.44%
Retail Online Retailer 113,142 102,088 11,053 10.83%
Total 847,578 901,759 (54,181) -6.01%
Total - All Areas
Lionshead
Out of Town
Vail Village
Retail Summary
Cascade Village / East Vail / Sandstone / West Vail
Town of Vail Business Review
November 4.5% Sales Tax
2025 Collections 2024 Collections YoY % ChangeYoY $ Change
57
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.2
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
SUBMITTED BY:Missy Johnson, Housing
ITEM TYPE:Information Update
AGENDA SECTION:Information Update (4:55pm)
SUBJECT:October 14, 2025 VLHA Minutes
SUGGESTED ACTION:
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
2025-10-13 VLHA Meeting Minutes.pdf
58
Vail Local Housing Authority Minutes
Monday, October 13, 2025
4:00 PM
This Special Meeting is ZOOM ONLY.
Zoom meeting link: https://vail.zoom.us/j/82534922212
Craig joined just after the resolution was approved. Jason Dietz and Missy Johnson, Town of Vail
Housing Staff were present.
Present:
Steve Lindstrom
Dan Godec
Christine Santucci
Craig Denton
Kristin Kenney Williams
1. Call to Order (4:00pm)
Special meeting called to order at 4:01 p.m.as a zoom only meeting with a quorum present.
2. Citizen Participation (5
min.) no comments.
3. Approval of Minutes (5 min.)
3.1 Approval of September 23, 2025 Meeting Minutes
Presenter(s): Missy Johnson, Housing Coordinator
Time: 5 min
2025-09-23 VLHA Minutes.pdf
Kristin Kenney Williams made a motion to Approve; Dan Godec seconded the motion Passed (4 -
0).
4. Main Agenda
4.1 Resolution No. 4, Series of 2025, a Resolution Approving the Purchase of a Deed
Restriction Interest in Property (Type III Deed Restriction) in the Town of Vail
Legally Described as Subdivision: Vail Intermountain Dev Sub Block: 8 Lot: 7B,
Eagle County, Colorado with a Physical Address of 2932 Bellflower 7B, Vail
Colorado; and Setting Forth Details in Regard Thereto.
Presenter(s): Missy Johnson, Housing Coordinator
Time: 5 min
2025-4 VLHA Resolution Deed Restriction Purchase 2932 Bellflower Unit 7B.docx
Steve Lindstrom made a motion to Approve; Kristin Kenney Williams seconded the motion
Passed (4 - 0).
5. Matters from the Chairman and Authority Members
Dietz reviewed the administrative process for submitting expenses as reimbursements directly
to finance. These are for small, miscellaneous expenses and more details will follow via email.
59
Williams touched on the final task for members Godec and Denton to set up their VLHA
email addresses and to watch for instructions via email from Sue or Kristin. Housing staff
reconfirmed that a conference room may be arranged for Sue and members if needed.
6. Adjournment
Meeting adjourned at 4:11 p.m.
7. Next Meeting Date Tuesday, November 11.
Vail Local Housing Authority Meeting Minutes of October 13, 2025
2 60
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.3
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
SUBMITTED BY:Missy Johnson, Housing
ITEM TYPE:Information Update
AGENDA SECTION:Information Update (4:55pm)
SUBJECT:November 11, 2025 VLHA Meeting Minutes
SUGGESTED ACTION:
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
2025-11-11 VLHA Meeting Minutes.pdf
61
1 | P a g e
Vail Local Housing Authority Minutes
Tuesday, November 11, 2025
3:00 PM
Vail Town Council Chambers and virtually by Zoom.
Zoom meeting link: https://vail.zoom.us/j/82534922212
Present:
Steve Lindstrom, Chairman
Dan Godec
Christine Santucci
Craig Denton
Kristin Kenney Williams
Staff:
Anna Bengtson, Housing Development Specialist
Missy Johnson, Housing Coordinator
Jason Dietz, Housing Director
Robyn Smith, Senior Housing Coordinator
Call to Order (3:00pm)
Citizen Participation (5 min.)
Todd Mossa - General Manager of the Wren, speaking on behalf of 15 or so condo-hotel managers would
like to engage with the VLHA about possible funding sources for employee housing. States that the
ballot initiative 2A opposition campaign group he represents was not against what 2A stood for as a
whole, was just opposed to the way it was brought about. Has come to offer an olive branch to open up
future conversations.
Chairman Lindstrom thanks group for engaging. States 2A opposition campaign talked about 'better
solutions' - and the VLHA is open to hearing their ideas and moving forward.
Approval of Minutes (5 min.)
3.1 Approval of October 13, 2025 - Special Meeting Minutes
Presenter(s): Missy Johnson, Housing Coordinator
Time: 5 min
2025-10-13 VLHA Meeting Minutes.pdf
Dan Godec made a motion to Approve ; Kristin Kenney Williams seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0).
Main Agenda
Lindstrom opens item 4.3
62
2 | P a g e
4.3 Housing Project Update
Listen to update on Housing Development Projects.
Presenter(s): Anna Bengtson, Housing Development Specialist
Time: 15 min
Anna Bengtson, Housing Development Specialist, provides board update on the progress of Timber Ridge,
Southface, and East Vail CDOT Parcel. Timber Ridge continues vertical. Anticipating phased occupancy to
begin in December. Rockfall mitigation underway. Southface dirt is moving. Dietz notes currently three
months ahead of schedule, largely due to early ordering of CME walls and strategic partnerships for off -
site material storage and sorting in Dowd Junction.
Lindstrom opens item 4.2
4.2 3rd Quarter Financial Update
Review 3rd Quarter Financials.
Presenter(s): Jake Shipe, Budget Manager
Time: 5 min
2025 3rd Quarter VLHA Financial Update.pdf
Jake Shipe, Town of Vail Budget Manager, presents 3rd Quarter Financial Update.
Shipe reviews the Vail Local Housing Authority Income Statement and Balance Sheet - highlighting YTD
revenue of $23,882.82, YTD expenditures of $9,980.54, and fund balance standing at $411,064.88.
Lindstrom notes $35,000 annual loss in revenue resulting from the buy -out of Lions Ridge's ground
lease. Dietz confirms that VLHA revenue source terminated upon sale in Q4 2024.
Shipe reviews the Town of Vail Housing Fund through Q3 2025 - highlighting $4m in expenditures and
$20m in transfers to the Timber Ridge Fund and Vail Home Partners Corporation for Southface.
Lindstrom clarifies for the public that the Vail Local Housing Authority and the Town of Vail Housing
Fund are separate entities.
Shipe confirms - explains that the Town of Vail Housing Fund revenue is derived primarily from the Housing
Sales Tax implemented in 2022 by voter approved ballot initiative; as well as transfers from Capital Projects
Fund to the Housing Fund for specific housing projects and housing initiatives.
Williams requests clarification for the record that the Town of Vail has a Housing Fund, and Housing
dollars do not go into the General Fund.
Shipe confirms that Williams is correct, adds this is verified by auditors.
Santucci thanks Williams for the clarification - states it is important for public understanding.
Lindstrom clarifies that $2m for Town of Vail Employee Housing was a Capital Projects Fund
expenditure, not a Housing Fund expenditure. Shipe Confirms.
63
3 | P a g e
Lindstrom opens item 4.1
4.1 2026 Budget: Resolution No. 5, Series 2025
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny 2026 Budget as presented.
Presenter(s): Jake Shipe, Budget Manager
Background: A resolution adopting a budget and making appropriations to pay the costs, expenses and
liabilities of the Vail Local Housing Authority, for its fiscal year January 1, 2026 through December 31,
2026.
Time: 20 min
VLHA 2026 Proposed Budget - Fund Statement.pdf
VLHA Proposed 2026 Budget Line-Item Detail.pdf
VLHA Resolution No. 5 (2026 Budget).pdf
Jake Shipe, Town of Vail Budget Manager, presents budget.
Lindstrom requests moving $4,000 from Meals into Professional Development.
Williams looks forward to presenting to Council in February.
Denton remarks on operating in deficit.
Lindstrom notes the loss of revenue from Lions Ridge, and added expense of public meeting media
coverage.
Dan Godec made a motion to Approve Motion to Approve with the Condition the budget is amended as
follows: Professional Development: $6,500 and Meals: $1,000; Craig Denton seconded the motion
Passed (5 - 0).
Lindstrom opens item 4.4
4.4 Consideration of Contract with Impact Finance Center – Experiential Impact Investing
Education
Authorize the Chair to execute a contract with the Impact Finance Center for the Experiential Impact
Investing Education Program in an amount not to exceed $15,000 plus pre-approved travel expenses.
Presenter(s): Steve Lindstrom, Chair
Background: Impact Finance Center previously facilitated an impact investing workshop for the Town,
and has submitted a proposal to continue this work through a structured two -phase education and
implementation program for consideration by the Vail Local Housing Authority.
Time: 10 min
VLHA_Memo_ImpactFinanceCenter.pdf
Lindstrom shares ongoing discussions with Impact Finance regarding a contract—still in a discovery
phase, with no formal agreement or expenditure yet. Placeholder of $15,000 budgeted for potential
future contract which can be rolled into 2025.
Dietz notes current services provided via previous grants, not active VLHA spending.
64
4 | P a g e
Godec shares external housing expert, David Smith, supports continued engagement with Impact
Finance, citing value in long-term relationship.
Board agreed to maintain flexibility and revisit formal arrangements as discussions progress; possibility
raised for Impact Finance to present at a future meeting when a contract is up for approval.
Lindstrom opens item 4.5
4.5 EHU Exchange Fee Program
Review and discuss the program as presented.
Presenter(s): Robyn Smith, Housing
Background: On October 21st, 2025, Vail Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 20, Series of 2025
amending Vail Town Code §12-13-5(D)(5) Employee Housing Unit (EHU) Deed Restriction Exchange
Program – Fee in lieu. This amendment provides an opportunity—subject to Town Council review and
approval—for certain property owners to apply for release of an existing Employee Housing deed
restriction in exchange for a fee-in-lieu payment to the Town.
Time: 10 min
External_EHUExchangeFeeUpdate.pdf
Robyn Smith, Senior Housing Coordinator, presents EHU Exchange Fee Program outline and process for
Board discussion following the adoption of Ordinance No. 20, Series of 2025 amending Vail Town Code
§12-13-5(D)(5); which provides an opportunity—subject to Town Council review and approval—for
certain property owners to apply for release of an existing Employee Housing deed restriction in
exchange for a fee-in-lieu payment to the Town.
Williams inquires about the options available to a property that would exceed their GRFA limitations if
an EHU is exchanged off.
Smith explains that deed restricted square footage typically does not count as GRFA - when a deed
restriction is released from a property the square footage becomes GRFA - which is an addition. A GRFA
study is required for submittal for DRB approval. Should the exchange result in exceeding the GRFA
limitation the owner could seek a variance from PEC, remove GRFA to come into conformity, or
redevelop in conformity.
Denton affirms that valuing property is best achieved on a case-by-case basis. Adds GRFA rules have
changed over time; properties have developed around those EHU's and GRFA rules.
Discussion ensures. Staff will begin education and outreach to prospects and facilitators. Leveraging
brokers and builders to get the word out and getting some applicants in the door will help define the next
steps.
Matters from the Chairman and Authority Members
Board discusses the failure of Ballot Initiative 2A. Looks to enhance community engagement, education,
outreach; explore/revisit funding mechanisms; regroup and persist. Looks to planning and discussion of
Strategic Plan and Semi-annual Housing update to Council. Testing VLHA emails addresses to confirm if
migration is acceptable at next meeting.
65
5 | P a g e
Adjournment
Charmain Lindstrom Adjourned at 4:21pm.
Next Meeting Date
Tuesday December 9th, 2025 at 3:00pm in Town Council Chambers.
66
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.4
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
SUBMITTED BY:Missy Johnson, Housing
ITEM TYPE:Information Update
AGENDA SECTION:Information Update (4:55pm)
SUBJECT:December 9, 2025 VLHA Meeting Minutes
SUGGESTED ACTION:
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
2025-12-09 VLHA Meeting Minutes.pdf
67
1
Vail Local Housing Authority Minutes
Tuesday, December 9, 2025
3:00 PM
Virtually by Zoom Only:
Zoom meeting link: https://vail.zoom.us/j/83110634258
Present: Steve Lindstrom
Dan Godec
Christine Santucci
Craig Denton
Kristin Kenney Williams
Staff:
Anna Bengtson, Housing Development Specialist
Missy Johnson, Housing Coordinator
Jason Dietz, Housing Director
Robyn Smith, Senior Housing Coordinator
1. Call to Order (3:00pm) Steve Lindstrom called the meeting to order at 3:05pm; Quorum was established.
2. Citizen Participation (5 min.) Jessica Copeland introduced herself as a Vail resident since 2023 with experience in outdoor education
and sustainable design. She expressed interest in community housing and remaining engaged with
local housing efforts.
No further public comment.
3. Approval of Minutes (5 min.)
3.1 Approval of November 11, 2025
2025-11-11 VLHA Meeting Minutes.pdf
Kristin Kenney Williams made a motion to Approve ; Christine Santucci seconded the motion Passed (4 -
0).
Craig Denton joined the meeting at 3:11pm after vote.
4. Main Agenda
4.1 Housing Project Update Listen to update on Housing Development Projects.
Presenter(s): Anna Bengtson, Housing Development Specialist
Time: 15 min
Bengtson provided updates on Timber Ridge, Southface, and East Vail parcels.
Timber Ridge: Courtesy walkthroughs completed; formal inspections scheduled. Building D underway.
68
2
199 units reserved/under contract. EHU credit interest increasing with active development proposals.
Preparation underway for resident welcome packet - board conversation emphasized messaging around
Vail’s housing story, community engagement, and using Timber Ridge to strengthen the civic voice of
residents.
Southface: Winterization underway; earthwork progressing. Continued alignment on phased occupancy
planning and 2026 construction schedule.
East Vail: Field work completed for Environmental, Geotech, and Survey. Staff coordinating
zoning/entitlement path with Planning.
4.2 2025 Holiday Party Choose a date, time and place for the holiday party. Presenter(s): Robyn Smith, Senior Housing Coordinator
Time: 5 min
Board agreed to hold the holiday gathering Monday, December 22, 2025 at 4:00 PM at a venue to be
selected by staff, preference for supporting a local business benefiting from Timber Ridge workforce
housing. Smith to distribute calendar invite and confirm venue.
4.3 Impact Finance Center
Listen to update on Vail Place Based Impact Investing update.
Presenter(s): Steve Lindstrom, Chair
Time: 10 min
Discussion continued on engaging the Impact Finance Center (IFC) to develop place - based impact
investing strategies focused on missing-middle homeownership and targeted housing projects.
IFC and VLHA are converging on a primary pilot concept: Long-term mortgages serving households roughly
80–200% AMI, above Habitat’s core clientele (<80% AMI) possibly using Habitat’s zero-interest loan model
as a conceptual roadmap; secondary pilot concept East Vail townhomes financing.
Board expressed interest to proceed and direction to resolve outstanding questions: Scope, timeline, and
deliverables must be clearly defined. Ownership of collateral must rest with VLHA/Town. Board and staff
workload expectations need clarification.
Directed Staff to arrange Special VLHA meeting with IFC for structured Q&A. Target date: December 22,
2025 at 3:00 PM (backup: December 16). Board members agreed to submit questions in advance to
facilitate productive discussion.
4.4 Preparing for Semi Annual Update
Discuss preparing for the semi-annual housing update and joint presentation to Town Council anticipated
for February 2026. Presenter(s): Steve Lindstrom, Chair & Robyn Smith, Senior Housing Coordinator
Time: 10 min
Discussion covered: February 2026 presentation to highlight progress, challenges, short and long - term
housing strategy, and desired results to be achieved. Regular VLHA meeting on January 13, 2026 will
serve as the main strategy and framing session.
69
3
Key themes emerged: The board is taking an active role in regional housing conversations shaping
upcoming regional decisions (e.g., potential regional authority, shared tools, financing mechanisms).
Looking beyond major housing projects under construction - East Vail in pipeline and more. Funding
constrained; misinformed rhetoric may have contributed to failure of recent Ballot Issue 2A for dedicated
housing funding – highlighting importance of community engagement and communication. Housing
Needs Assessment reaffirms persistent gap is affordable homes to sustain year -round, rooted resident
population. Opportunity for a new long-range housing vision; looking beyond the 2027 target to a new 10–
20 year horizon. Near term opportunities include Vail Indeed 2.0, and innovative solutions to tackling the
triad of challenges: availability, affordability, and variety.
Board concurred January 13 VLHA meeting to serve as primary strategy session and review draft framing
materials. Directed staff to circulate key guiding documents, frameworks, and housing needs
assessment for Board members to reflect on long-range population and community housing outcomes,
rental vs. ownership balance, priority tools and policy directions to propose to Council in support of
strategic plan.
5. Matters from the Chairman and Authority Members Williams highlighted Colorado Gives Day. Board agreed Town Manager should be invited to holiday
gathering pending availability. Further acknowledgement of bandwidth considerations for IFC
engagement.
6. Adjournment Lindstrom adjourned the meeting at 4:14 PM
70
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.5
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
SUBMITTED BY:Missy Johnson, Housing
ITEM TYPE:Information Update
AGENDA SECTION:Information Update (4:55pm)
SUBJECT:December 16, 2025 VLHA Meeting Minutes
SUGGESTED ACTION:
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
2025-12-16 VLHA Special Meeting Minutes.pdf
71
Vail Local Housing Authority Meeting Minutes of December 16, 2025 Page 1 of 2
Vail Local Housing Authority Minutes Tuesday, December 16, 2025
3:00 PM
SPECIAL MEETING
Virtually ONLY by Zoom.
Zoom meeting 1 | Pre-Executive Session | https://vail.zoom.us/j/82663345666
Zoom meeting 2 | Post-Executive Session | https://vail.zoom.us/j/81069012739
Present:
Steve Lindstrom, Chair
Dan Godec
Christine Santucci
Craig Denton
Kristin Kenney Williams
Staff Present:
Anna Bengtson, Housing Development Specialist
Missy Johnson, Housing Coordinator
Robyn Smith, Senior Housing Coordinator
1. Call to Order (3:00pm)
Chair Lindstrom called the Special Meeting of the Vail Local Housing Authority to order at
3:01 p.m - quorum was established.
2. Main Agenda
2.1 Consideration of Contract with Impact Finance Center
Authorize the Chair to execute a contract with the Impact Finance Center in an amount not
to exceed $25,000 plus pre-approved travel expenses.
Presenter(s): Impact Finance Center
Background: Impact Finance Center previously facilitated an impact investing
workshop for the Town. The Vail Local Housing Authority has requested to discuss
contracting for additional services as proposed by Impact Finance Center.
Time: 30 min
_Phase I & II_ Financial Innovation and Impact Investing for Vail .docx.pdf
Chair Lindstrom provided background on IFC’s September 2025 impact investing seminar
and subsequent discussions that led to IFC submitting a proposal for consideration.
Explains the VLHA is considering sponsoring an additional series of educational webinars
and sessions, clarifying the distinction between the VLHA and the Town of Vail.
72
Vail Local Housing Authority Meeting Minutes of December 16, 2025 Page 2 of 2
Dr. Stephanie Gripne, Alexis Halbert, and Dawn Rocky from Impact Finance Center. IFC
representatives described their investor education model, intermediary relationships, and
conceptual approach to structuring capital to meet housing needs while aligning investor
expectations. Board members asked questions regarding potential application to local
housing initiatives, including mortgage assistance and future development opportunities.
Discussion ensued.
Smith clarified governance boundaries and public meeting requirements for VLHA decision-
making. General alignment was expressed by both VLHA and IFC on roles and process.
No action was taken.
3. Executive Session
Kristin Kenney Williams made a motion to Adjourn to Executive Session pursuant to: C.R.S.
§24-6 -402(4)(e) to determine positions relative to matters that may be subject to
negotiations, develop a strategy for negotiations, and instruct the negotiators regarding:
contract for service with Impact Finance Center.; Christine Santucci seconded the motion
Passed (5 - 0).
4. Any Action as a Result of Executive Session
The Vail Local Housing Authority returned from Executive session at 4:16pm.
Kristin Kenney Williams made a motion to Authorize to authorize the Chair to work with legal
council and staff, to draft and enter into a contract in an amount not to exceed $25,000 plus
pre-approved travel expenses, for a period of up to 12 months with a start date to be
determined, for the services proposed by Impact Finance Center.; Christine Santucci
seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0).
5. Adjournment
Chair Lindstrom adjourned the meeting at 4:18pm.
6. Future Agenda Items
• VLHA biannual update to council
7. Next Meeting Date Tuesday, January 13th 2026 at 3:00pm
73
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.1
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager
ITEM TYPE:Matters from Mayor, Council, Town Manager and Committee Reports
AGENDA SECTION:Matters from Mayor, Council, Town Manager, and Committee
Reports (4:55pm)
SUBJECT:Mayor, Town Council and Committee Reports (15 min.)
SUGGESTED ACTION:
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
74
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.2
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager
ITEM TYPE:Matters from Mayor, Council, Town Manager and Committee Reports
AGENDA SECTION:Matters from Mayor, Council, Town Manager, and Committee
Reports (4:55pm)
SUBJECT:Town Manager Report (20 min.)
SUGGESTED ACTION:
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
TM Update 010625.docx
75
Town Managers’ Update
January 6, 2026
1. Big Three Town of Vail Capital Projects (Timber Ridge, South Face, Dobson)
Town staff would like to share a brief update on the three large capital projects the Town of Vail is
either building or supporting. Staff will provide these updates monthly or as needed. Again, the three
projects include: Timber Ridge, South Face/West Middle Creek, and the Dobson Event Center.
A. Southface (Prepared by Corum)
At 31% of first phase time duration, General Contractor is ahead of schedule and reported a 97%
health assessment rating. Corum has worked with General Contractor on accelerating schedule
during sitework phase. A re-sequenced plan has been agreed to and is in place to potentially pick
up schedule. However, time savings may be lost during winter months and management of on-site
mechanical soil amendment, however weather conditions have been quite favorable for continued
production during the month. A baseline evaluation will be made in March of 2026 with the transition
into CIP foundation work to determine full schedule impacts/improvements.
Shaw has written all contracts and sent out 50 of 56 contracts in order of priority which met the
contractual buyout target; current issued equates to 102.2M of 105.9M or 97%. Shaw has fully
executed 37 of 56 contracts; current executed equates to 93.6 M of 105.9M or 88%. The project is
substantially bought out at this time. Shaw is currently projecting a savings of $486,970 in buyout
savings to be applied back to contingency in January.
Shaw is currently forecasting the use of $889,928 of $1,200,00 in material escalation or 74.2%.
Currently Corum is working on material escalation remediation efforts including early and alternate
procurement.
The biggest risk the project current faces is soil conditions on site are inferior compared to initial
geotechnical investigations. This was based on standard testing utilizing borings across the site.
Through more accurate testing of the soils at the time and place during the commencement of
backfill operations, it has been determined that the soil has too many fine clay particulates and is not
passing gradation testing. The project is evaluating options and negotiating costs with the general
contractor and subcontractors. Based on current information, the approximate range of costs
impacts is between $1.5 and $2.5 million dollars. Corum is undergoing a transfer of allowances to
cover potential costs as well as utilizing the off-site storage at Dowd Junction to help augment soil
conditions in a cost-effective manner.
Good news, additional exemptions to tax and use credits were clarified with the State and County
leading to additional savings. The Department of Revenue previously recently revoked its earlier
decision and the TOV successfully appealed the revocation, thanks to the Finance Department.
These credits are projected to be in the range of $1,000,000+; which will largely offset any increase
in costs due to soil conditions.
Accordingly, if the tax credits can offset the civil infrastructure risks, given current buyout savings,
and if material escalation due to tariffs can continue to be minimized; Corum is currently evaluating
potential upgrades to recommend to the TOV. Those are expected to be introduced, priced, and
incorporated over the next 3 months.
76
Page 2
B. Timber Ridge Village (Prepared by Triumph)
Schedule update:
Building A: Working to complete the inspections.
- Building: Mech inspections will be called for later today
- Fire: TOV Fire will be on site Wednesday to complete Alarm, Sprinkler already passed.
- Public Works: Have asked for a Friday the 2nd walk.
- Panning: Have asked for a Friday the 2nd. Walk.
- State inspections passed 12/18
- Elevator inspections, Work by TKE elevator installer 1/12. Inspections called for 1/13.
Once elevator inspections is final, we will asking for TCO on Building A.
Building F: Exterior material install in progress. Interiors working on MEP services. Tracking toward a
CO for early March 2026. Gaining final power from Holy Cross has pushed this date back slightly.
Building B / E are both tracking toward occupancy August 2026.
Building G completed the set process on 11/10, occupancy September 2026.
Building D was set right before Christmas, currently scheduled for 12/1.
Over all project still on track for completion October 2026.
Budget:
Project Budget:
We are quickly approaching another winter, and winter conditions. These cost are currently being
funded by budget savings on the Shaw contract. Other small scope gaps are being taken care of
with remaining contingency.
Sales:
We continue to market the homes to both businesses and individuals. As of today, we have
reservations of $139,982,094, this does take into account both Habitat (30 homes) and TOV.
This table does represent 8 TOV units, as those are the units TOV will be purchasing in building A. F
and then B will be discussed and reserved once we get closer to the Certificate of Occupancy.
EHU:
An agreement has been made with Hospital for down payment assistance, this could represent 5
homes (Studios / one bed / two bed). VH is working with 1800 employees to identify interested
buyers. Letters have been sent out to all, they are expecting to hear back in mid January from
interested individuals. There are a number of other proposed projects that have approval to satisfy
their EHU requirements at TRV.
Then there is the underperforming single family home / Habitat EHU opportunity, this could represent
a number of additional home sales above there now number of 30.
77
Page 3
C. Dobson Event Center
The Dobson Arena Project Town Council approved total budget of $55,791,549.00 remains on track.
The project’s cost to date is $17,526,274 (31%).
The Owner has approved a total of $1,409,643 construction change order requests. Of these
$907,756 have been funded from Owner's Contingency and $501,887.68 have been funded from
Contractor’s Contingency. $1,531,671 (61%) of Owner’s Contingency is remaining. If Owner’s
Contingency permits, additional scope/costs have been identified and categorized as either “wants”
or “needs”. “Wants” include Refinishing Wood Roof Structure, Added Kitchen Equipment,
Scoreboard/Ribbon boards, Mondo Flooring Upgrade and Gate to Player Box. “Needs” include
Sanitary Line Relocation, Unanticipated Schedule Impacts, Additional Third-Party Testing,
Unforeseen Structural Considerations, Unforeseen Utilities, Unforeseen Under slab Conditions,
Mechanical Slab Screening, Unforeseen MEP Scope and Summer 2026 Parking Fees.
The project construction buyout is now 99% complete, with a total amount of $32,562,346 awarded to
33 total subcontractors.
The project construction schedule is now 50% complete and updated schedules continue to remain
on track with substantial completion of September 30, 2026 final acceptance scheduled for October
28th, 2026, however, significant compression of scope has been identified and is being monitored
closely.
Current issues requiring attention are as follows:
Construction dewatering allowance overrun
Show lighting scope addition
Sport floor upgrade
Award of signage design and fabrication
Closeout of open allowances
2. VRD / Dobson Operating Agreement Update:
A draft operating agreement has been shared with VRD and a preliminary meeting held on Dec
17th with their leadership team. The agreement is now with their attorney for red-line changes that
were talked about in that meeting; we anticipate a return of the red-lined draft in the next week or
two. Other than needing a follow up conversation between attorneys on the merits of an “operating
agreement” rather than a “lease”, there were no notable changes to the agreement from what Council
has seen previously.
3. Update on Energy Performance and Geothermal District Project (McKinstry)
The final details of the Energy Performance Contract Terms and Conditions are in the process of
being finalized. While the project is budgeted, remains a sound financial investment and is supported
by a minimum of 47% in grant funding, the town will utilize the provisions of the contract that allow for
a phased approach to avoid any surprises or cost exposure. The contract is broken up into 1. Pre-
Construction (Design, Specs, Specific Schedule of Values) 2. Construction, 3. Measurement and
78
Page 4
Verification/Training. The Town Manager has authorized the Pre-Construction Phase Notice to
Proceed in the amount of $654,653, as a portion of the project total of $9.1M.
4. Joint Meeting with Boards
In December, Council expressed interest in meeting with several boards, specifically the Vail Local
Marketing District Advisory Council (VLMDAC). New VLMDAC members will be seated on January
15th and the group would be available for a joint work session in February. This work session follows
the town council strategic retreat on January 19-20 and precedes the VLMDAC’s strategic planning
meeting on February 19.
Staff would also recommend meeting with the Vail Local Housing Authority and the Planning and
Environmental Commission. There was also interest in meeting with the Housing Authority which has
occurred several times each year and staff would also suggest meeting with the Planning
Commission particularly as the Town prepares for a land use code update. Specific proposed dates
include:
Vail Local Housing Joint meeting February 3, 2025
Planning and Environmental Commission Joint meeting either the first or second meeting in May
of 2026.
5. Other
The Town Manager may have other topics that have arisen since the publication of the Council
packet.
79
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.3
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager
ITEM TYPE:Matters from Mayor, Council, Town Manager and Committee Reports
AGENDA SECTION:Matters from Mayor, Council, Town Manager, and Committee
Reports (4:55pm)
SUBJECT:Council Matters and Status Update
SUGGESTED ACTION:
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
260106 Matters.docx
Future Topics.docx
80
COUNCIL MATTERS
Status Report
Report for January 6, 2025
Council Comments at December 16th meeting:
Town Council gave a big shout out to both TOV staff and businesses
that participated in the production of “Stoke Sessions” for early season
activation! Also Kris Kringle Market was well received and provided
fun things for guests to do.
Town Council gave a big shout out to TOV staff for the amazing
holiday lights, with festive and fun lights at West Vail and beautiful,
classic lighting at Main Vail.
Council acknowledged the very special gathering held to honor the
retirement of three long-term employees: Charlie Turnbull, Jim Hervert
and Janeil Turnbull.
Council requested election campaign spending results: Vail Common
Sense Housing Committee $100,500; Vail Locals For Housing $6,529
and Council candidates spent less than $5,000 combined. For more
details, https://www.vail.gov/government/departments/town-clerk-s-
office/election-information/candidate-campaign-reports
Council requested more data on how businesses did over the holidays,
including sales tax and parking data. Staff will provide an update
during today’s meeting.
Council requested a joint meeting with the Vail Local Marketing District
Advisory Council (VLMDAC). Staff has scheduled this joint meeting
during Council’s afternoon session on February 3 rd.
Social Media Listening
Sprout Listening link: https://share.sproutsocial.com/view/0a2dc906-2f67-481e-adc9-
062f67c81e66
In spite of the tough conditions, people seem to be making the best of it and staying
positive! A couple examples: https://www.instagram.com/reels/DSn5zaPjm7_/
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSyYGCgDhcS/
81
The speed enforcement cameras have continued to be controversial, as evidenced by
this post https://www.facebook.com/100069104204103/posts/1186804530299676/
In the News______________________________________________________
Dec. 14
Sofi Tukker Concert - review
https://www.vaildaily.com/news/review-sofi-tukker-performances-take-concertgoers-on-an-epic-
apres-ski-crawl-up-down-and-across-vail-mountain/
Dec. 16
Turnbulls and Hervert Retirement
https://www.vaildaily.com/news/3-loyal-town-of-vail-public-works-employees-clock-out-after-126-
years-of -combined-service/
Art in the Service of Antisemitism - editorial
https://jewishjournal.com/commentary/opinion/385687/art-in-the-service-of-antisemitism/
Dec. 18
Global Tourism Trends
Https://www.coloradopolitics.com/2025/12/18/a-5-billion-ski-industry-confronts-a-cold-front-in-
global-tourism-fiscal-rockies/
Dec. 19
No Place Like Home - editorial
https://www.vaildaily.com/opinion/howard-theres-no-place-like-home-for-the-holidays/
New I-70 Interchange - letter
https://www.vaildaily.com/opinion/letter-everyone-needs-to-get-on-board-with-new-i-70-
interchange/
Dec. 22
Yetis in Ford Park
https://www.vaildaily.com/news/finding-yetis-olympic-skaters-meet-vails-avalanche-dogs-and-
more-this-holiday-weekend-in-the-vail-valley/
https://www.realvail.com/free-yeti-ford-alpine-adventure-now-open-in-vails-ford-park/a24363/
Dec. 27
Vail Village Cultural Crisis - letter
https://www.vaildaily.com/news/letter-vail-village-cultural-crisis/
Dec. 28
Answering Vail Village Question - editorial
https://www.vaildaily.com/opinion/columns/ferry-answering-taylor-paules-question/
Dec. 29
New Year's Eve
https://www.vaildaily.com/news/new-years-eve-happenings/
82
https://www.realvail.com/celebrate-fun-safe-new-years-eve-in-vail/a24392/
https://www.vaildaily.com/news/vail-beaver-creek-ring-in-the-new-year-with-terrain-openings-
and-a-full-serving-of-events/
Important Dates______________________________________________________
January 19 & 20 Town Council Strategic Retreat
83
Future Topics, January/February 2026
TOPIC DEPARTMENT
Main Vail Pedestrian Improvements design update Public Works
Strategic Planning Retreat Administration
Joint Meeting VLHA Housing
Joint Meeting VLMDAC Economic Development
84
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.1
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager
ITEM TYPE:Citizen Participation
AGENDA SECTION:Public Participation (6:00pm)
SUBJECT:Public Participation
SUGGESTED ACTION:
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
Public_Participation_010626.pdf
85
Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening
attachments. When in doubt, contact Vail IT Department
From:Bill Morton (Omnicom)
To:Stephanie Kauffman; Russell Forrest; CommDev; PLANNING@VAILGOV.COM; Matt Gennett; Public Input Town
Council; Council Dist List
Subject:RED LION COMMERICAL EXPANSION PROPOSAL
Date:Friday, December 19, 2025 1:43:54 PM
Attachments:image001.png
Dear Vail Leaders,
My name is Bill Morton, and Kay and I have resided in the Mill Creek Court Building since
1990 having purchased our very special home from Rod and Beth Slifer.
I have just this week learned of the application for the Red Lion project. I was never
notified by anyone that this was merely a word-of-mouth FYI.
I have taken a quick look, and I am at a loss to understand the urgency of getting this done
without further detailed review.
I and so many others have worked so hard to protect the residential aspect of the Town of
Vail….everything from view corridors to protecting the stream track, to managing noise,
trash and garbage removal, ingress and egress, town beautification, the sheep and much
more.
I also clearly understand the economic benefit for the town to have additional restaurant
space, party space and more, but this needs further clarification and a vetting process that
is responsible and practical for all.
In short, further discussion is necessary and the “plans” need to be far more detailed
showing ventilation, trash and garbage flow, site lines, noise lines, etc.
I am deeply disappointed that there has been NO communication to me (and I presume the
surrounding owners) concerning this project.
That is not in the spirit of which we govern.
I’m available at any time and, of course, welcome your comments and our participation.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Bill Morton
M / +1 917 864 2372
www.jackmorton.com
Find us on Instagram / LinkedIn / YouTube
86
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are
the intended recipient (or authorized to receive this message for the intended recipient), you
may not use, copy, disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information
contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender
by reply e-mail, and delete the message. Thank you very much.
87
From:kbenysh@vail.net
To:Council Dist List
Subject:Vail Core Concerns
Date:Sunday, December 28, 2025 1:56:16 PM
Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt,
contact Vail IT Department
I am deeply concerned and quite saddened by what I see happening in the
Vail core. It seems like more and more doors are effectively being
closed to locals. Seeing institutions like Swiss Hot Dog (Blu Cow), Los
Amigos, Little Diner, or locals’ favorites like Big Bear Bistro and The
George being replaced by high-end retail or swanky restaurants and clubs
breaks my heart. It’s as though Vail has hung out a sign saying,
“Locals Not Welcome.”
While change is inevitable, Vail is evolving into a place I don’t
recognize after 51 years of living here, and I now question if it might
be time to leave. I commend you for passing an ordinance requiring
restaurant spaces to remain restaurants, but replacing something
inviting and inclusive like Los Amigos with a snooty, exclusive
club/restaurant completely changes the face of Vail.
I urge you to put your heads together and come up with ways to stop this
mutation, perhaps something like a “historical” or “legacy” designation
on certain buildings or businesses, or financial considerations with
permitting, DRB, renovation fees, etc. for legacy properties.
Those of us who have lived here for a long time cherish this town, but
it is becoming a place that we no longer recognize or where we feel
welcome. The way things are headed, the young people here today cannot
afford to regularly enjoy the town, and if they can’t enjoy it, they
will never love it.
I challenge you to find a way to preserve these landmarks.
Thank you,
Kathryn Benysh
88
From:Shawn Moore
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:Complaint
Date:Sunday, December 28, 2025 7:07:37 PM
Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt,
contact Vail IT Department
I was told that I should direct my complaint to this email address.
Who would be the person to direct a formal complaint to?? I have been coming to Vail since 1989….my
grandmother went for many many years prior….back when the Lodge had condos for 30K, she told me that for
years!!
I must say that I’m appalled that Vail would be involved with kicking out Blu Cow. Ernst was the kindest man and
our family followed him from lionshead to Avon. And of course, back to Vail Village (our favorite location) with
his daughter. Blu Cow is literally our favorite place and a huge memory for my now adult kids. Why in the world
would you want them to leave? You kicked them out of the summer market and now this?? It honestly makes me
sick. We hated when a Starbucks moved in, took away from the charm of the village. We loved when Vail Mountain
Coffee had their little coffee shop and bakery right in the village. Everyone loves the local mom and pop places. So
many people are very upset!!
Mrs Shawn Moore
Sent from my iPhone
89
From:Amanda Zinn
To:Matt Gennett; Public Input Town Council
Subject:Fw: *NEW SUBMISSION* General Contact Form
Date:Tuesday, December 30, 2025 3:23:29 PM
Attachments:Outlook-0coard1w.png
Outlook-ih2snxni.png
Outlook-ag5cv0ue.png
Outlook-hu4fqydw.png
Outlook-denc2zwn.png
Outlook-m3sbphux.png
Hello,
Please see email chain below, just sharing.
Thank you and Happy New Year!
Amanda
Amanda Zinn
Welcome Centers and Host Programs Manager
75 S. Frontage Road W.
Vail, Colorado 81657
970.477.3520
970.376.1754 cell
DiscoverVail.com
Vail.gov
From: Amanda Zinn <AZinn@vail.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2025 3:21 PM
To: paula_giblin@icloud.com <paula_giblin@icloud.com>
Cc: Info <info@vail.gov>
Subject: Re: *NEW SUBMISSION* General Contact Form
Hi Paula,
We have forwarded your comments to the appropriate parties. Thank you for reaching out.
Happy New Year!
Amanda
Amanda Zinn
Welcome Centers and Host Programs Manager
90
75 S. Frontage Road W.
Vail, Colorado 81657
970.477.3520
970.376.1754 cell
DiscoverVail.com
Vail.gov
From: Vail, CO <noreply@vail.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2025 3:00 PM
To: Info <info@vail.gov>
Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* General Contact Form
General Contact Form
Submission #:4545448
IP Address:185.195.59.210
Submission Date:12/30/2025 3:00
Survey Time:9 minutes, 2 seconds
You have a new online form submission.
Note: all answers displaying "*****" are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login.
Name
PAULA GIBLIN
Email
paula_giblin@icloud.com
Phone
(720) 289-6907
Subject
Blu Cow Closing
91
Message
Hello, I am a property owner in Vail have been coming here for over 40 years. I am writing in support of the
longstanding and very beloved Blu Cow restaurant. The last place I would want to shop or spend time in is a town
where character and locally owned businesses have been replaced by chain stores. Is there something you can do in
terms of zoning to help local businesses thrive and keep vulgar and pretentious junk out? There is nothing worse
than traveling and finding the same options you could get in any other city. Vail has wonderful local character.
Please do not let it be destroyed by high fashion brands that no one wants. Thank you!
Thank you,
Vail, CO
This is an automated message generated by Granicus. Please do not reply directly to this email.
92
VAIL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
Date: January 5, 2026
Dear: Mayor Davis and Town Council Members
Developers are converging on the Vail Community Development staff, the Town of Vail (TOV)Design Review
Board (DRB), Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC), and Town Council (VTC) with projects that
push the boundaries on height, density, offsets, and other applicable zoning standards. The community could be
on the edge of being transformed from quaint and human-scale to urban and grossly commercial.
While we understand that Developers, including Vail Resorts (VR) and the Town (TOV) want to maximize
their development dollars and future revenues, must it be done at the expense of the community’s character and
charm? A fledgling Town government put guardrails in place to help guide design and other aspects of growth
in the Town, via strict zoning and landscape planning. The regulations have served the community well, but are
now being tested and challenged as never before.
Some redevelopment projects have been called to task on requests for variances in height, density, and setbacks,
while others have been granted exceptions, leading to the appearance of preferential treatment. Special
treatment on some projects contributes to the deterioration of the essence of the community at large; it can
contribute to more imposing buildings looming over the pedestrian walkways, diminished landscaping, and the
loss of the human scale Vail was built upon.
There are remedies to inconsistent or preferential approvals or denials; some are much more palatable than
others. If property owners, residents, or developers feel their interests have not been dealt with fairly, they can
file an appeal with the TOV. The catch is, there is a conflict of interest; the TOV grants the permits or
variances, and then, it is the body deciding the appeal. If satisfactory resolution is not reached with an appeal to
TOV, less desirable from a community and efficiency standpoint, but potentially necessary measures are
available. Vail, as a community, can make this right by judiciously reviewing and adhering to zoning and
historic guidelines that will protect property owners, the character, and quality of every new and redevelopment
project, to the benefit of residents, guests, and business owners.
VHA believes that more intensive enforcement is needed to ensure that every project for development, large
and small, is held to equal standards that have maintained the charm of Vail Village and the harmony of the
community since the very beginning. VHA recommends that involved parties provide funding and resources,
such as legal counsel to pursue appeals of compliance issues.
Sincerely,
Pam Stenmark, President
Vail Homeowners Association
Board of Directors. Post Office Box 238 Vail, Colorado 81658
Telephone: (970) 827-5680 E-mail: vha@vail.net Web Site: www.vailhomeowners.com
93
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.1
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager
ITEM TYPE:Consent Agenda
AGENDA SECTION:Consent Agenda (6:10pm)
SUBJECT:December 2, 2025 TC Meeting Minutes
SUGGESTED ACTION:
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
120225 TC Meeting Minutes.pdf
94
Town Council Meeting Minutes of December 2, 2025. Page 1
Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, December 2, 2025
6:00 P.M.
Vail Town Council Chambers
The meeting of the Vail Town Council was called to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. by Mayor
Davis.
Members present: Barry Davis, Mayor
Reid Phillips, Mayor Pro Tem
Samantha Biszantz
Dave Chapin
Kevin Foley
Kim Langmaid
Jonathan Staufer
Staff members present: Russell Forrest, Town Manager
Kathleen Halloran, Deputy Town Manager
Stephanie Kauffman (Bibbens), Town Clerk
Matt Mire, Town Attorney
1.Call to Order
2.Public Participation
Public Participation began at timestamp 0:00:31on the High Five video.
Beth Howard, Chief Operating Officer of Vail Mountain, gave an update on the opening of the
winter ski and snowboard season.
Tim McMahon, Town of Avon resident, welcomed the new council members and asked for
donations toward his court fees.
Bill Jensen, Vail resident, congratulated the new council members and thanked all council
members for their service and encouraged the current and future councils to focus on
community and creating local housing opportunities similar to the Chamonix Townhomes.
Ian Grask, a Vail resident, asked that the town ensure its rates for electric vehicle charging are
set at a break-even point and echoed Bill Jensen’s request for additional larger, family-oriented
locals housing.
Peter Noble, a Vail resident, anticipated the current Town Council would be well-balanced and
looked forward to more public-private partnerships.
3.Any action as a result of Executive Session
95
Town Council Meeting Minutes of December 2, 2025. Page 2
4. Consent Agenda
Consent Agenda began at time stamp 0:10:56 on the High Five video.
4.1 November 4, 2025 TC Meeting Minutes
4.2 November 18, 2025 TC Meeting Minutes
4.3 Contract Award to Axon Enterprises Inc for the Axon AI Era Plan
Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town
Attorney, with Axon Enterprises Inc for the Axon AI Era Plan, in an amount not to exceed
$334,160.69.
Background: Axon AI Era Plan aims to enhance operational efficiency and reduce administrative
burdens across the department. This technology package was developed specifically for law
enforcement to streamline processes, support frontline staff, and improve response capabilities.
This project was approved in the 2026 budget.
Staufer made a motion to approve items 4.1 and 4.2; Chapin seconded motion passes (5-0,
Foley and Langmaid abstained due to not being on Town Council during those meetings).
Phillips made a motion to approve the remaining consent agenda items; Staufer seconded
motion passed (7-0).
5. Action Items
Discussion for Ordinance No. 32, Series of 2025 began at time stamp 0:12:08 on the High Five
Media video.
5.1 Ordinance No. 32, Series of 2025, First Reading, An Ordinance Making Budget
Adjustments to the Town of Vail General Fund, Capital Projects Fund, Real Estate
Transfer Tax Fund, Housing Fund, and Heavy Equipment Fund of the 2025 Budget for the
Town of Vail; Colorado; and Authorizing the Said Adjustments as Set Forth Herein; and
Setting Forth Details in Regard Thereto
Presenter(s): Jake Shipe, Budget Manager
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 32, Series of 2025 upon first
reading.
Background: Since the approval of the second supplemental budget of 2025 on June 17,
various unanticipated events and decisions have occurred that require adjustments to the 2025
budget.
Chapin made a motion to approve; Staufer seconded motion passed (7-0).
6. Public Hearings
96
Town Council Meeting Minutes of December 2, 2025. Page 3
Discussion for Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025 began at time stamp 0:20:22 on the High Five
video.
6.1 Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025, First Reading, An Ordinance Approving the
Establishment of a New Special Development District No. 44, Lunar Park, and Specifically
to Approve the Development of a Multi-Family Development. Located at 442 South
Frontage Road East
Presenter(s): Greg Roy, Planning Manager
The applicant is requesting that Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025, be tabled to January 6, 2026.
Staufer made a motion to continue the public hearing and table Ordinance No. 28, Series of
2025 until January 6, 2026; Foley seconded motion passed (7-0).
Discussion for Ordinance No. 31, Series of 2025 began at time stamp 0:21:46 on the High Five
video.
6.2 Ordinance No. 31, Series of 2025, Second Reading, An Ordinance Rezoning Certain
Property in West Lionshead to the Lionshead Mixed Use 2 Zone District
Presenter(s): Heather Knight, Planner II
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 31, Series of 2025 upon second
reading.
Background: The applicants, Vail Corp, Soho Development and East West Partners, are
requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary amendment,
pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for the rezoning of 1000 S
Frontage Rd W, Glen Lyon Subdivision from the SDD #4 Zone District to the Lionshead Mixed
Use 2 (LMU-2) Zone District; 1031 S Frontage Rd W from the Arterial Business (ABD) Zone
District to the LMU-2 Zone District; and, 953 S Frontage Rd W from the Arterial Business (ABD)
Zone District to the LMU-2 Zone District.
Public comment was called. There was none.
Chapin made a motion to approve; Staufer seconded motion passed (7-0).
Discussion for Ordinance No. 25, Series of 2025 began at time stamp 0:28:01on the High Five
video.
6.3 Ordinance No. 25, Series of 2025, Second Reading, An Ordinance Providing for the
Levy Assessment and Collection of Town Ad Valorem Property Taxes Due for the 2025
Tax Year and Payable in the 2026 Fiscal Year
Presenter(s): Carlie Smith, Finance Director
97
Town Council Meeting Minutes of December 2, 2025. Page 4
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 25, Series of 2025 upon Second
reading.
Background: This ordinance authorizes the collection of property taxes in 2026 based on 2025
assessed valuations of property within the town’s boundaries.
Public comment was called. There was none.
Staufer made a motion to approve; Foley seconded motion passed (7-0).
There being no further business to come before the council, Foley made a motion to
adjourn the meeting; Davis seconded; meeting adjourned at 6:29pm.
Respectfully Submitted,
Attest: __________________________________
Barry Davis, Mayor
______________________________
Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk
98
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.2
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Town Manager
ITEM TYPE:Consent Agenda
AGENDA SECTION:Consent Agenda (6:10pm)
SUBJECT:December 16, 2025 TC Meeting Minutes
SUGGESTED ACTION:
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
121625 TC Meeting Minutes.pdf
99
Town Council Meeting Minutes of December 16, 2025. Page 1
Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, December 16, 2025
6:00 P.M.
Vail Town Council Chambers
The meeting of the Vail Town Council was called to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. by Mayor
Davis.
Members present: Barry Davis, Mayor
Reid Phillips, Mayor Pro Tem
Samantha Biszantz
Dave Chapin
Kevin Foley
Kim Langmaid
Jonathan Staufer
Staff members present: Russell Forrest, Town Manager
Kathleen Halloran, Deputy Town Manager
Stephanie Kauffman (Bibbens), Town Clerk
Matt Mire, Town Attorney
1. Call to Order
2. Public Participation
Public Participation began at time stamp 0:00:31 on the High Five Media video.
Tim McMahon, Town of Avon resident, thanked the Vail Police Department and the Vail Public
Safety Communications Center for their response during a recent incident. He also mentioned
that the map near the Tenth Mountain Memorial statue near the Covered Bridge is incorrect.
Taylor Joseph Gardarian, an Eagle County resident, congratulated the new mayor and council
and reminded the town of his previous requests regarding a West Vail gondola.
Jessie, John Coyne, and Terry Cooley, Uber drivers, expressed their concerns with the town’s
transportation permit fee and feel Uber drivers are being treated unfairly compared to other
transportation companies.
Jonathan Levine, owner of Black Car, expressed his frustration with the town’s transportation
permit fee and the process that established it.
3. Any action as a result of Executive Session
There was none.
100
Town Council Meeting Minutes of December 16, 2025. Page 2
4. Consent Agenda
Consent agenda began at timestamp 0:14:11 on the Hight Five Media video.
4.1 Resolution No. 56, Series of 2025, A Resolution Approving the Rules of Procedure
Appeal Hearings Before the Vail Town Council
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 56, Series of 2025.
Davis moved item 4.1 to just before 6.2 under the public hearings.
5. Action Items
Discussion for Red Lion’s Permission to proceed began at timestamp 0:14:56 on the High Five
Media video.
5.1 Red Lion Permission to Proceed
Presenter(s): Heather Knight, Planner II
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny permission to proceed.
Background: The owner, Red Lion Building LLC, represented by Ruther Associates LLC, of the
property located at 304 Bridge Street and 297 Hanson Ranch Road/Vail Village Filing 1, Block
5A, Lots E-H., is requesting permission for the use of Town property for patio spaces utilized by
the redeveloped restaurant spaces. There are currently three separate leases for patios on
Town right-of-way (ROW) for multiple tenants. This application, in conjunction with a Conditional
Use Permit, updates the separate patio leases and combines the redeveloped patio spaces into
one lease.
Staufer made a motion to approve; Phillips seconded motion passed (7-0).
6. Public Hearings
Discussion for Ordinance No. 32, Series of 2025 began at timestamp 0:19:04 on the High Five
video.
6.1 Ordinance No. 32, Series of 2025, Second Reading, An Ordinance Making Budget
Adjustments to the Town of Vail General Fund, Capital Projects Fund, Real Estate
Transfer Tax Fund, Housing Fund, and Heavy Equipment Fund of the 2025 Budget for the
Town of Vail; Colorado; and Authorizing the Said Adjustments as Set Forth Herein; and
Setting Forth Details in Regard Thereto
Presenter(s): Jake Shipe, Budget Manager
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 32, Series of 2025 upon second
reading.
101
Town Council Meeting Minutes of December 16, 2025. Page 3
Background: Since the approval of the second supplemental budget of 2025 on June 17,
various unanticipated events and decisions have occurred that require adjustments to the 2025
budget.
Public comment was called. There was none.
Chapin made a motion to approve; Staufer seconded motion passed (7-0).
Discussion for Resolution No. 56, Series of 2025 began at timestamp 0:20:21 on the High Five
video.
6.2 Resolution No. 56, Series of 2025, A Resolution Approving the Rules of Procedure
Appeal Hearings Before the Vail Town Council
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 56, Series of 2025.
Chapin made a motion to approve Resolution No. 56, Series of 2025; Staufer seconded motion
passed (7-0).
Discussion for Appealing East Lionshead Circle Application began at timestamp 0:25:35 on the
High Five video.
Phillips recused himself from the appeal hearing due to being a contracted construction
consultant on the project being appealed.
6.3 Appealing East Lionshead Circle Application
Presenter(s): Greg Roy, Planning Manager
Uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the Design Review Board’s October 15, 2025,
decision.
Background: Telemark Ventures LLC, and Vail Property Group LLC, represented by Ruther
Associates, pursuant to Section 12-11-3, Design Approval, Vail Town Code, for new
construction of a new multi-family development within the Lionshead Mixed-Use 1 (LMU-1)
Zone District located at 534 East Lionshead Circle, A Resubdivision of a part of Lots 1, 2, 3 and
Tract E Block 1, Vail/Lionshead Filing No. 1. (DRB25-0343)
On October 15, 2025, the Design Review Board held a public hearing on the application and
voted 4-0 to approve the application, finding that the application met section 14-10-3, 14-10-4,
and 14-10-5 of Vail Town Code.
On November 4, 2025, Kenneth Rotman (Kenneth Joel Rotman Trust), an adjacent property
owner, submitted an appeal of the approval of the DRB application.
Foley made a motion to continue the public hearing until January 6, 2026 in order for the Town
Attorney to bring back a Resolution for Town Council to consider findings and conclusions
upholding the Desing Review Board’s decision; Langmaid seconded motion passed (6-0;
Phillips recused himself).
102
Town Council Meeting Minutes of December 16, 2025. Page 4
There being no further business to come before the council, Foley made a motion to
adjourn the meeting; Staufer seconded; meeting adjourned at 7:18pm.
Respectfully Submitted,
Attest: __________________________________
Barry Davis, Mayor
______________________________
Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk
103
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.1
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
TIME:10 min.
SUBMITTED BY:Greg Roy, Community Development
ITEM TYPE:Action Items
AGENDA SECTION:Action Items (6:10pm)
SUBJECT:West Lionshead Supplemental Budget Request and
Reimbursement Agreement (6:10pm)
SUGGESTED ACTION:Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form
approved by the Town Attorney, with East West Partners, in an
amount not to exceed $400,000 and approve the reappropriation of
$125,000 from 2025 Civic Area Master Plan savings to support the
exploration of an expanded potential Downtown Development District
beyond the West Lionshead area.
PRESENTER(S):Matt Gennett, Community Development Director and Carlie Smith,
Finance Director
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
010626 Supplemental EWP.docx
Reimbursement Agreement Template.docx
104
1 | P a g e
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: January 6, 2026
SUBJECT: Supplemental Budget Request and Reimbursement Agreement, West Lionshead
I. SUMMARY
The West Lionshead project will require the Town to retain consultants to ensure that the
Town’s and the community’s interests are fully considered. These services could include legal
counsel, financial advisory services, election assistance , frontage road relocation, and a fiscal
analysis of the proposed district and surrounding areas.
The costs associated with these services will be reimbursable by East-West Partners in the
format of the attached reimbursable agreement. Expenses will be reimbursed monthly and are
intended to support the initial phases of the project, including evaluat ion of the potential for a
Downtown Development Authority (DDA) through the possible creation of a district.
The collective work produced by the consultants and staff will be instrumental in drafting a
predevelopment agreement and other next steps in the development review process.
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Staff requests approval of a reimbursement agreement in an amount not to exceed $400,000.
This amount will be included in the first supplemental appropriation of the year, along with the
corresponding reimbursement revenue.
In addition, the Town would like to consider expanding the district boundaries beyond the West
Lionshead area to allow for future flexibility for projects such as Arrive Vail. Evaluation of this
potential expansion would be at the Town’s expense. Staff proposes to utilize $125,000 in 2025
savings from the Civic Area Master Plan project for this purpose, which would be reappropriated
in the first supplemental appropriation of 2026.
105
2 | P a g e
III. BACKGROUND
At the October 15, 2024, Vail Town Council meeting, a partnership between the Town of
Vail, Vail Resorts, and East West Partners was announced to restart the master planning
process for West Lionshead.
The Town, Vail Resorts, and East West Partners collaborated on amendments to the
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan which were adopted by Resolution No. 36 on
September 16, 2025.
On December 2, 2025, Council approved Ordinance No. 31 on second reading, which
rezoned the remaining three of six parcels that comprise the development site to the
Lionshead Mixed Use-2 (LMU-2) zone district.
.
IV. RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff requests Council authorize a supplemental appropriation in an amount not to exceed
$400,000 for consultant services and the associated reimbursement agreement and
reappropriate $125,000 from 2025 Civic Area Master Plan savings to support the
exploration of an expansion of the potential DDA District beyond the West Lionshead area
V. ATTACHMENTS
A. Reimbursement Agreement
106
12/31/2025
C:\USERS\UFC-PROD\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF
8\@BCL@601710BD\@BCL@601710BD.DOCX
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
This Reimbursement Agreement (this "Agreement") is entered into as of
________________, 2025 (the "Effective Date"), by and between the Town of Vail, a
Colorado home rule municipal corporation (the "Town") and ___________________
("Applicant") (each a "Party" and collectively the "Parties").
WHEREAS, Applicant has filed an application with the Town for ______________
(the "Application"); and
WHEREAS, to process the Application, the Town must recover its out-of-pocket
costs.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants
herein contained, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as
follows:
1. Expenses. To assist the Town with the review of the Application , the Town has
retained certain consultants, including its contracted Town Attorney. The Town will incur
out-of-pocket costs for professional services and reimbursable expenses for travel to
meetings in connection with the services to be provided by such consultants. Applicant
agrees to reimburse the Town for such expenses at the consultant's billable rate, without
mark-up.
2. Deposit. Upon execution of this Agreement, Applicant shall provide $______ in
cash to the Town as an initial deposit to cover Applicant's reimbursement obligations.
The Town shall notify Applicant when the deposit is depleted, and within 7 days of such
notice, Applicant shall deposit an additional $__________ with the Town, and this process
shall continue until the Application has been fully processed and finally determined by the
Town. Within 120 days after such final determination, after all expenses have been paid,
any remaining amount shall be returned to Applicant.
3. Remedies. If Applicant fails to make any deposit or payment required by this
Agreement, the Town may take any or all of the following actions:
a. The Town may suspend review of the Application;
b. The Town may refuse to issue any building permits or certificates of
occupancy for the development that is the subject of the Application;
c. The Town may refuse to accept any other land use applications from
Applicant or its affiliated entities; and
d. The Town may exercise any other remedy against available at law or equity.
107
2
12/31/2025
C:\USERS\UFC-PROD\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF
8\@BCL@601710BD\@BCL@601710BD.DOCX
4. Miscellaneous.
a. Governing Law and Venue. The laws of the State of Colorado shall govern
this Agreement, and the exclusive venue for any legal proceeding arising out of this
Agreement shall be in Eagle County, Colorado.
b. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is found by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be unlawful or unenforceable for any reason, the remaining
provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect.
c. Governmental Immunity. Nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver of
any protections or immunities the Town or its employees, officials or attorneys may have
under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, C.R.S. § 24 -10-101, et seq., as
amended.
d. No Joint Venture. Notwithstanding any provision hereof, the Town shall
never be a joint venture in any private enti ty or activity which participates in this
Agreement, and the Town shall never be liable or responsible for any debt or obligation
of any participant in this Agreement.
e. Notice. Notices under this Agreement shall be sufficiently given if sent by
regular U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the address on the first page of this Agreement.
f. Integration. This Agreement, together with all exhibits attached hereto,
constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties, integrates all the terms
and conditions mentioned herein, and supersedes all negotiations or previous
arrangements between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.
g. Attorney Fees. If the Town takes steps to enforce this Agreement, Applicant
shall reimburse the Town for all attorney fees and costs associated with such
enforcement.
h. Assignment. Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights or obligations of
the Parties shall be assigned by either Party without the written consent of the other.
i. No Waiver. Delays in enforcement or the waiver of any one or more defaults
or breaches of this Agreement by the Town shall not constitute a waiver of any of the
other terms or obligation of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have made this Agreement as of the Effective
Date.
TOWN OF VAIL
________________________________
APPLICANT
108
3
12/31/2025
C:\USERS\UFC-PROD\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF
8\@BCL@601710BD\@BCL@601710BD.DOCX
_________________________________
109
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.1
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
TIME:5 min.
SUBMITTED BY:Stephanie Bibbens, Community Development
ITEM TYPE:Public Hearings
AGENDA SECTION:Public Hearings (6:20pm)
SUBJECT:Resolution No. 1, Series of 2026, A Resolution of the Vail Town
Council Making Findings on the Appeal of Case #DRB25-0343
and Affirming the Decision of the Design Review Board (534 East
Lionshead Circle) (6:20pm)
SUGGESTED ACTION:Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 1, Series
of 2026.
PRESENTER(S):Matt Mire, Town Attorney
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
Res. 1 Series of 2026.docx
110
1
1/5/2026
C:\USERS\UFC-PROD\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF
8\@BCL@C015E88F\@BCL@C015E88F.DOCX
RESOLUTION NO. 1
SERIES 2026
A RESOLUTION OF THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MAKING FINDINGS ON
THE APPEAL OF CASE #DRB25-0343 AND AFFIRMING THE
DECISION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD (534 EAST LIONSHEAD
CIRCLE)
WHEREAS, Telemark Ventures LLC and Vail Property Group LLC (collectively the
"Applicant") own the real property located at 534 East Lionshead Circle, Vail, CO, and
described as a Resubdivision of a Part of Lots 1, 2, 3 and Tract E, Block 1, Vail/Lionshead
Filing No. 1 (the "Property");
WHEREAS, the Applicant filed an application to construct a new multi-family
development within the Lionshead Mixed-Use 1 (LMU-1) Zone District, in case #DRBB25-
0343 (the "Application");
WHEREAS, on October 15, 2025, following a properly-noticed public hearing, the
Design Review Board ("DRB") unanimously approved the Application;
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2025, the Kenneth Joel Rottman Trust (the
"Appellant") filed an appeal of the DRB's decision, which appeal is governed by § 12-3-3
of the Vail Town Code;
WHEREAS, on December 16, 2025, the Town Council held a properly-noticed
hearing on the appeal, and the Appellant was provided with an opportunity to present
evidence in support of its appeal; and
WHEREAS, following the hearing, the Town Council directed the Town Attorney
to prepare a Resolution with written findings regarding the appeal.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF VAIL:
Section 1. Findings. Having heard and considered the evidence and arguments
presented by the Appellant, the Applicant, and Town staff, the Town Council hereby finds
and determines as follows:
a. The Appellant alleges that the Town Council should overturn the decision
of the DRB in this case because the DRB's decision will negatively impact the
Appellant's right to later construct some type of speculative improvement that has
yet to be designed or proposed. More specifically, the Appellant alleges that if "a
Lionshead project prevents another Lionshead project contemplated in the
Lionshead Development Master Plan from happening (sic) the Vail Design Review
Board has the authority (and arguably the obligation) to reject or require
modification of a project in the Lionshead district …." However, the Appellant has
not cited to any provision in the Lionshead Development Master Plan that would
111
2
1/5/2026
C:\USERS\UFC-PROD\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF
8\@BCL@C015E88F\@BCL@C015E88F.DOCX
allow the Town Council to overturn the DRB's decision in this ca se. The
Appellant's argument that denial of the Application is required to provide room for
some later improvement that could possibly be proposed by the Appellant (or
others) is without any legal basis.
b. The Appellant has not submitted an application to construct any new
improvements within the purview of the Lionshead Development Master Plan. The
record does not reveal that there is any other pending land use application that
would be negatively impacted by the approval of the Application.
c. During the December 16, 2025 public hearing, the Appellant admitted on
the record that the Application as submitted complies with all currently applicable
provisions of the Lionshead Development Master Plan.
d. The Town Council agrees with both the DRB and the Appellant that the
Application complies with all relevant sections of the Lionshead Development
Master Plan.
e. The DRB properly considered the Application, the Applicant's arguments,
the Appellant's arguments, any public comment, and all other relevant information.
The DRB's decision is supported by the evidence in the record.
Section 2. Decision. Based on the foregoing findings, the Town Council hereby
affirms the decision of the DRB to approve the Application in Case #DRB25-0343.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of January,
2026.
______________________________
Barry Davis, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Stephanie Kaufmann, Town Clerk
112
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.2
Item Cover Page
DATE:January 6, 2026
TIME:75 min.
SUBMITTED BY:Greg Roy, Community Development
ITEM TYPE:Public Hearings
AGENDA SECTION:Public Hearings (6:20pm)
SUBJECT:Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025, First Reading, An Ordinance
Approving the Establishment of a New Special Development
District No. 44, Lunar Park, and Specifically to Approve the
Development of a Multi-Family Development located at 442 South
Frontage Road East (6:25pm)
SUGGESTED ACTION:Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 28,
Series of 2025 upon first reading.
PRESENTER(S):Greg Roy, Planning Manager
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance No. 28 Staff Memorandum - Lunar Park - SDD.docx
Attachment A. Vicinity Map.pdf
Attachment B. Applicant Narrative.pdf
Attachment C. Lunar Park Traffic Assessment 7-17-25.pdf
Attachment D. Lunar Park - EIR - 7-23-25.pdf
Attachment E. PEC25-0026 Documents.pdf
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans Part1.pdf
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans Part2.pdf
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans Part3.pdf
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans Part4.pdf
Attachment G. 9-8-25 PEC Results.pdf
Attachment H. PEC Results 9-22-25.pdf
Attachment I. Letter from Vail AIPP.pdf
Attachment J. Employee Housing Plan - Updated.pdf
Attachment K. Housing Department Comments.pdf
Attachment L. Public Comment.pdf
Attachment M. PEC Results 10-13-25.pdf
Attachment N. PEC25-0026 SDD Staff Memo.pdf
Attachment O. Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025.pdf
113
Attachment P. November 4, 2025 Town Council Minutes.pdf
Attachment Q. PEC25-0026 Revised Plans Part1.pdf
Attachment Q. PEC25-0026 Revised Plans Part2.pdf
Attachment Q. PEC25-0026 Revised Plans Part3.pdf
Attachment Q. PEC25-0026 Revised Plans Part4.pdf
Attachment R. November 4, 2025 Staff Presentation.pdf
Attachment S. November 4, 2025 Applicant Presentation.pdf
Public Participation Lunar Vail.pdf
Ord. 28 Staff Presentation 1-6-26.pdf
110425_Ruther_Presentation.pdf
Public Comment.pdf
114
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: January 6, 2026
SUBJECT: First reading of Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025 an ordinance approving the
establishment of a new special development district No. 44, Lunar Park, and
specifically to approve the development plan to allow for the development of a
multi-family development, located at 442 South Frontage Road East . (PEC25-
0026)
Applicant: Lunar Land Investments LLC, represented by Ruther
Associates
Planner: Greg Roy
I. SUMMARY
The applicant, Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC, represented by Ruther Associates is
requesting approval for the establishment of a new Special Development District,
pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for
the development of a multi-family project, located at 442 South Frontage Road East/ Vail
Village Filing 5, Tract D.
The Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the proposed SDD
on October 13, 2025 where a recommendation for DENIAL was forwarded to the Vail
Town Council by a unanimous vote of 5-0 (Tucker and Lintner absent).
Please find the staff memorandum to the PEC and the minutes from the October 13, 2025
meeting attached to this report.
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The Vail Town Council shall approve, approve with modifications, deny Ordinance No.
28, Series of 2025, upon first reading.
The applicant, Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC, represented by Ruther Associates is
requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of a new
115
Town of Vail Page 2
Special Development District, pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development
Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a multi -family project The
development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses and
activities. The development plan may consist of, but not be limited to, the approved site
plan, floor plans, building sections and elevations, vicinity plan, parking plan, preliminary
open space/landscape plan, densities and permitted, conditional and accessory uses.
The following items are included for review:
Attachment A. Vicinity Map
Attachment B. Applicant Narrative - Updated
Attachment C. Lunar Park Traffic Assessment 7-17-25
Attachment D. Lunar Park – EIR – 7-23-25
Attachment E. PEC25-0026 Documents
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans
Attachment G. PEC Results 9-8-25
Attachment H. PEC Results 9-22-25
Attachment I. Letter from Vail AIPP
Attachment J. Employee Housing Plan - Updated
Attachment K. Housing Department Comments
Attachment L. Public Comment
Attachment M. PEC Results 10-13-25
Attachment N. PEC25-0026 Staff Memo 10-13-25
Attachment O. Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025
Attachment P. November 4, 2025 Town Council Minutes
Attachment Q. PEC25-0026 Revised Plans
Attachment R. November 4, 2025 Staff Presentation
Attachment S. November 4, 2025 Applicant Presentation
III. BACKGROUND
On November 4, 1965, the original plat of the Vail Village Fifth Filing was approved by the
Eagle County Planning Commission that established Tract D, Vail Village Fifth Filing. The
next year in 1966 this lot was annexed into the Town of Vail.
The Apollo Park buildings were constructed in the early 1970s as employee housing. In
September of 1978 a condominium map of the Apollo Park at Vail Association was
recorded in the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder’s office and the owners at that time
began to sell the fractional ownership of the units creating the Timeshare use on the site.
Originally one lot, in 2006 the site was subdivided to allow for the development of
Mountain View Residences Phase 1 and Mountain View Residences Phase 2 (Altus).
These were constructed in 2008 and 2019, respectively.
The Apollo Park lot has remained largely unchanged outside of the nearby developments.
116
Town of Vail Page 3
As part of the Altus development, the Apollo Park did redesign and improve the pool area
on-site.
The application for a Conditional Use Permit (PEC25-0024), Special Development District
(PEC25-0026), and Master Plan Amendment (PEC25 -0025) were reviewed at the
September 8, 2025 PEC meeting. The PEC’s comments can be reviewed in the minutes
from that meeting in Attachment G. The item was reviewed for changes at the September
22, 2025 PEC meeting. There were no new plans submitted for review prior to this
meeting and no review by staff for this reason. The PEC provided comments which can
be found in the minutes from that meeting in Attachment H.
The application was presented to the PEC at the October 13, 2025 PEC meeting where
the PEC forwarded a unanimous recommendation of Denial of the application to the Town
Council.
The first reading of the ordinance was held at the November 4, 2025 Town Council
meeting. At this meeting, the Town Council members noted that the application either did
not meet the required criteria for approval, needed additional public benefit, or needed to
be revised to meet the PEC’s recommendations. At that meeting, the application was
continued to the December 2, 2026 Town Council m eeting and then tabled again to the
January 6, 2026 Town Council meeting.
Additionally at that meeting the Town Council denied, with a vote of 6-1 (Coggins
Opposed) Resolution No. 52, Series of 2025 to amend the Vail Village Master Plan. The
amendment would have permitted 5-6 stories along the south side of the subject property,
compared to the Master Plans adopted 4-story limitation.
Standard Allowed/required Proposed Complies
Site Area 10,000 SF Min 56,347 SF Complies
Setbacks 20 Ft All Sides
Front: 20’
Side (East): 20’
Side (West): 6’
subgrade
Rear: 20’
Deviation requested
sub-grade on West
side setback
Height 48 Ft 69.8 Ft Deviation Requested
Density (onsite) 25 Units/Acre: 31
Units 66 Units Deviation Requested
GRFA 76 SF/100 Buildable:
40,434 SF 95,097SF Deviation Requested
Site Coverage 55%: 30,991 SF 33,986 or 60% Deviation Requested
Landscaping 30%: 16,890 SF 16,981 SF or 30% Complies
Onsite Parking 123 Spaces & 75%
within the building
116 Spaces & 100%
within the building
Deviation Requested
Since the November 4, 2025 TC meeting, the applicant has made some changes to the
application including the items listed below:
117
Town of Vail Page 4
Converted two Dwelling Units to EHUs
Added an EHU to bring the total to 11 onsite
Reduced GRFA by 9% (10,099 SF)
Reduced Site Coverage by <1% (278 SF)
Reduced the ridge height of the South Building by 2.5 feet
Increased landscaping by 5% (736 SF)
Revised the floor plan to relocate the Timeshare units below the Dwelling Units in
the south building
The revised Employee Housing Plan has a couple changes from provided in the formal
PEC application from October. The Inclusionary Zoning requirement dropped from 7,862
sq ft to 6,720 sq ft in accordance with the project-wide decrease in GRFA. In the October
plan, eight on site units were proposed (totaling 6,488 sq ft; 1 2BD/1BA and 7 1BD/1BA)
with a fee in lieu payment for the remaining 1,374 sq ft of the requirement ($928,494).
This met the 10% Inclusionary Zoning requirement. With the changes the applicant is
proposing 11 on site units (totaling 10,775 sq ft; 1 2BD/1BA and 10 1BD/1BA) with a fee
in lieu payment of $665,624 (equivalent to 985 sq ft). This exceeds both the 10%
Inclusionary Zoning requirement as well as the 50% on site requirement. As stated in the
proposal, the goal is to provide an additional 7.5% of the Inclusionary Zoning employee
housing mitigation requirement between the proposed units and fee in lieu payment.
The remaining questions and comments on the Housing Plan follow:
1. It is confirmed that only 50% of the Inclusionary Zoning mitigation is required on
site to be consistent with Town Code and the Vail Village Master Plan.
2. Any units and fee-in-lieu payments above the minimum 10% Inclusionary Zoning
employee housing mitigation requirement is considered a public benefit
contributing to the Housing Department goal to acquire/develop more deed
restricted housing.
3. There were not full floor plans with GRFA listed for each of the updated 11 on site
EHUs. However, the units should all meet the minimum required 1 -BD and 2-BD
unit GRFA in Town Code Chapter 12-24-3, Table 24-1 based on a basic square
footage calculation.
4. There are two conflicting statements regarding timing of fee in lieu payment in the
revised Employee Housing Plan. One sentence says payment made by Certificate
of Occupancy and once sentence says payment made by Building Permit. This
seems to simply be a typo between revisions. To confirm, Town Code requires that
any fee in lieu payments are made prior to issuance of Building Permit (12 -24-
6(4)(c)).
5. Each of the 11 on site units is assigned 1 parking space. This is consistent with
the previous submission. The overall parking requirement, which requires 2 spaces
for each of the EHUs based on square footage. In the narrative, it is cited that this
118
Town of Vail Page 5
is consistent with the 2024 adopted Housing Policy Statements (Page 60 ). We
would still encourage consideration of assigning an additional parking space to at
least the 2-BD EHU.
6. Stated on Page 47 of the narrative that the EHU deed restriction would apply only
to persons employed by businesses within the Town of Vail. We would encourage
them to prioritize persons employed by businesses within the Town of Vail, so the
deed restriction has a little flexibility if needed.
7. There is still question on what price point is being targeted for the EHUs, but it is
not a requirement, the information may change, and it may not be fully within the
scope of this discussion/review.
lV. REVIEW CRITERIA
Criteria: The following design criteria shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluation
the merits of the proposed special development district. It shall be the burden of the
applicant to demonstrate that the submittal material and the proposed development plan
comply with each of the following standards or demonstrate that one or more of them is
not applicable or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been
achieved.
See the attached Staff Report from the October 13, 2025 PEC meeting for analysis of the
criteria.
1. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate
environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural
design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual
integrity and orientation.
2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient
and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
3. Parking And Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as
outlined in chapter 10 of this title.
4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail
comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans.
5. Natural And/Or geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or
geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district
is proposed.
6. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space
provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and
119
Town of Vail Page 6
sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the
community.
7. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians
addressing on and off site traffic circulation.
8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to
optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function.
9. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable,
functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special
development district.
V. PUBLIC BENEFIT
Per Vail Town Code Section 12-9A-9: “…Before the Town Council approves
development standards that deviate from the underlying zone district, it should be
determined that such deviation provides benefits to the town that outweigh the adverse
effects of such deviation. This determination is to be made based on evaluation of the
proposed Special Development District’s compliance with the design criteria outlined in
§ 12-9A-8 of this article.”
Based on the PEC’s finding that the application does not meet the required criteria . When
reviewing an SDD application the decision to approve or deny should be based on the
criteria and not the public benefit. If the criteria are met, then the public benefit should be
evaluated to determine if the deviations provide benefits to the town that outweigh the
adverse effects of such deviation. The proposed development’s public benefits are
included for information. Per 12-9A-8(B) the decision to approve an application needs to
meet all the criteria listed above.
For informational purposes the applicants have listed the following as purported benefits
of the project:
- Fee in lieu for 985 SF of Inclusionary Zoning, equaling $665,624
o Reduced from 1,374 square feet of Inclusionary Zoning, equaling a fee of
$928,494.24
- Eleven on-site employee housing units totaling 10,775 SF (6,720 SF required)
o Increased from eight units and (6,488 SF)
- $125,000 for the Gore Creek Stream Tract Fund
- Implementation of a Short Term Rental program
- Replacing the Apollo Park units
- Paying the Traffic Impact fee (required)
- Granting an easement for emergency vehicle ingress and egress and pedestrian
access for the adjacent Wren property
120
Town of Vail Page 7
- Installation of landscaping along South Frontage Rd
- Removal of encroachments on Stream Tract
- Installation of snowmelted sidewalk along South Frontage Rd
- 100% of parking located within a building (75% required)
- Public art in the amount of $200,000
For comparison the Altus Development (SDD No. 42), which is directly to the west of the
property, is shown for comparison of deviations and benefits.
Standard Allowed/Required
HDMF
Mountain
View Altus Lunar/Apollo
Setbacks Front - 20' Side - 20'
Rear- 20'
Front - 20' Side (W) 20' Side
(E) - 15' Rear - 20'
Front - 20'
Side (W) 6'
Side (E) - 20'
Rear - 20'
Height Flat or Mansard Roof -
45' Sloping Roof 48'
Sloping Roof
- 48'
Sloping Roof -
70 Ft
Sloping Roof
69.8
Density
(Units) 25 Dus/Buildable Acre 38 DUs or 29.3/acre
118% of allowable
66 DUs or 54
DUs/acre
213% of
allowable
Density
(GRFA)
Max: 76SF/100SF of
Buildable Site Area
75,280 or 170% of
Allowable GRFA
95,097 or
235% of
Allowable
GRFA
Site
Coverage Max: 55% 48% 60%
Landscaping Min: 30% of total site
area 40% 30%
The benefits of the associated with the Altus development were listed as the following:
- 42.7% of the project were Employee Housing Units (15 units)
- Short term rental program for the development
- Land donation to the Town of almost 900 SF
121
Town of Vail Page 8
- Paved access path and stairs through the property for the benefit of the general
community to access the Gore Creek Path
- Reconstructing and heating the path in front of the development and across the
neighboring property to the street corner
- Pursuing Green Globe Certification for the building
- Public art in the amount up to $50,000
- Economic vitality to the Vail Village
Through comparison, the benefits of the two projects are similar, with more deviations
being requested out of the proposed development.
Developer Improvement Agreement
Should the Town Council wish approve Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025, a Developer
Improvement Agreement (DIA) would be needed to accommodate the ordinance with first
reading. In that instance, Town Council should continue the public hearing for first reading
in order for staff to work with the applicant to create a developer improvement agreement
to accommodate the ordinance.
Vl. RECOMMENDED MOTION
Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of the October 13, 2025 PEC
memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and
Environmental Commission recommends the Town Council DENY the establishment of
a new Special Development District No. 44 Lunar Park, pursuant to Section 12-9(A),
Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a multi-
family project, located at 442 South Frontage Road East/ Vail Village Filing 5, Tract D.
Should the Town Council deny this request, the Planning and Environmental Commission
recommends the Council pass the following motion:
“I move that the Town Council denies, on first reading, Ordinance No. 28, Series of
2025, an ordinance approving the establishment of a new special development district
No. 44, Lunar Park, and specifically to approve the development plan to allow for the
development of a multi-family development, located at 442 South Frontage Road East
with the findings on pages 6 and 7 of the Town Council Memorandum. (PEC25-0026).”
Should the Town Council choose to deny this request, the Planning and Environmental
Commission recommends the Council make the following findings:
1. The SDD does not comply with the standards listed in Section VII of this
memorandum, or the applicant has demonstrated that one or more of the
standards is not applicable;
122
Town of Vail Page 9
2. The SDD is not consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined
in the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the development objectives
of the town;
3. The SDD is not compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for
the surrounding areas; and
4. The SDD does not promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the
town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in
a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its
established character as a resort and residential community of the highest
quality.”
Alternative Motions
1. Should the Town Council wish to remand the application back to the Planning and
Environmental Commission for review, Staff recommends the following motion:
“I move to remand the subject application back to the Planning and Environmental
Commission for their review and recommendation in accordance with section 12 -
9A-4(C), Vail Town Code.”
2. Should the Town Council wish to approve this request, Staff recommends the
following motion
“I move that the Town Council approves on first reading Ordinance No. 28, Series
of 2025, with the finding that it meets the applicable review criteria from Section
12-9A-8, Vail Town Code, and listed on pages 5 and 6 of the staff memorandum”.
Vll. ATT ACHMENTS
Attachment A. Vicinity Map
Attachment B. Applicant Narrative - Updated
Attachment C. Lunar Park Traffic Assessment 7-17-25
Attachment D. Lunar Park – EIR – 7-23-25
Attachment E. PEC25-0026 Documents
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans
Attachment G. PEC Results 9-8-25
Attachment H. PEC Results 9-22-25
Attachment I. Letter from Vail AIPP
Attachment J. Employee Housing Plan - Updated
Attachment K. Housing Department Comments
123
Town of Vail Page 10
Attachment L. Public Comment
Attachment M. PEC Results 10-13-25
Attachment N. PEC25-0026 Staff Memo 10-13-25
Attachment O. Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025
Attachment P. November 4, 2025 Town Council Minutes
Attachment Q. PEC25-0026 Revised Plans
Attachment R. November 4, 2025 Staff Presentation
Attachment S. November 4, 2025 Applicant Presentation
124
S FRO
N
T
A
G
E
R
D
E
I 70 Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
I 70 W
e
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
G
O
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
D
R
VA
I
L
V
A
L
L
E
Y
D
R
I
Subject Property
0 100 20050
Feet
4 4 2 S o u t h F r o n t a g e R o a d E a s t ( A p o l l o P a r k C o n d o s )
V a i l V i l l a g e F i l i n g 5 , P a r t o f T r a c t D
4 4 2 S o u t h F r o n t a g e R o a d E a s t ( A p o l l o P a r k C o n d o s )
V a i l V i l l a g e F i l i n g 5 , P a r t o f T r a c t D
P E C 2 5 - 0 0 2 4 : C o n d i t i o n a l U s e P e r m i t
P E C 2 5 - 0 0 2 6 : E s t a b l i s h n e w S D D
P E C 2 5 - 0 0 2 4 : C o n d i t i o n a l U s e P e r m i t
P E C 2 5 - 0 0 2 6 : E s t a b l i s h n e w S D D
This map was created by the Town of Vail GIS Team. Use of this map should be for general purposes only. The Town of Vail does not warrant the accuracy of the information contained herein.
(where shown, parcel line work is approximate)
Last Modified: Sept. 11, 2025 125
OCTOBER 13, 2025 RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES & APOLLO PARK
442 South Frontage Road East
Vail, Colorado 81657
Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission
Special Development District No. 44
(PEC25-0024 – 0026)
Final Review
10/13/2025
126
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: Introduction
Section 2: Design and Development Team
Section 3: Project Description
Section 4: Background
Section 5: Development Applications
Section 6: Development and Building Program
Section 7: Final Development Plans
7.1 Survey
7.2 Vicinity and Context
7.3 Site Plan
7.4 Landscape Plan
7.5 Architectural Floor Plans
7.6 Building Section Diagrams
7.7 Architectural Elevations
7.8 Architectural Renderings
7.9 Exterior Building Materials
7.10 3-D Model and Animations
Section 8: Land Use and Zoning Analysis
Section 9: Public Benefits
Section 10: Demonstration of Review Criteria Compliance
Section 11: Recommended Findings & Conditions of Approval
127
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
128
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 1
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION
The Ownership
Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC (“Lunar Vail”) is the ownership entity of the property located at 442
South Frontage Road East, Vail, CO, 81658, legally described as Part of Bldgs. A & B, Tract D, Vail
Village Filing No. 5. (“Property”). Local Vail residents, Ron and Shawn Byrne (“Owner”) manage the
Property on behalf of Lunar Vail. Lunar Vail maintains the fee simple ownership interest in the land
and serves as the grantor of a leasehold agreement with the grantee, Apollo Park at Vail Association
(“Apollo Park HOA”). Apollo Park HOA owns and manages the vertical improvements (residential
timeshare unit buildings, swimming pool, outdoor seating areas, trash/recycling facilities, etc.) on
the land area, which is subject to the leasehold agreement.
The Project
Together, Lunar Vail and Apollo Park HOA desire
to develop the new Lunar Vail Residences and
redevelop the existing Apollo Park Lodge
timeshare units. The project proposes to be a
mix of new residential condominiums, timeshare
units, and community housing. As one of the last
remaining infill development and redevelopment
opportunities in the East Vail Village
neighborhood, the Property holds great promise
for continued reinvestment in the Vail
community. It has been through continual
upgrades and reinvestments in the built
environment that the Vail community has
remained at the top as the “premier international
mountain resort community”.
The Approach
As a single-purpose ownership entity, Lunar Vail
will take the lead and manage the new
development and redevelopment processes of
the Property. With more than 1,700 timeshare
estate owners within the Apollo Park HOA, the
Board of Directors has worked most closely with
Lunar Vail and serves to direct the
redevelopment on behalf of the timeshare owners’ interests. This collaborative approach to the
redevelopment of the Property ensures all interested parties are actively participating. Lunar Vail
continues to actively engage with adjacent property owners in the neighborhood to share information
and ensure transparency within the development review process. To date, multiple meetings have
been held with the owners' associations of the Vail Mountain View Residences, Altus Vail
129
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 2
Residences, and The Wren Condominiums. Input from the neighbors is evident throughout the
proposed project.
The Opportunity
The Lunar Vail Residences/Apollo Park development achieves the purposes of the High-Density
Multiple Family (HDMF) district and advances stated community development goals and
objectives. Of significance, the new development achieves the following community goals:
1) continued upgrading and enhancement of Vail Village through infill residential
redevelopment,
2) completing the specific recommendations of the Vail Village Master Plan for the East Vail
Frontage Road sub-area,
3) increasing annual sales/lodging tax collections and vitality through an increase in
occupancy of live beds,
4) helping the Vail community acquire 1,000 net new deed restrictions by the year 2027
through the provision of new, on-site community housing units and a payment-in-lieu
contribution,
5) preserving the timeshare use on the property without displacing the current owners, and
6) fostering a collaborative partnership between the landowner and the land tenant to
redevelop an aging property.
The Location
The new Lunar Vail Residences and redeveloped Apollo Park are ideally located within an east Vail
Village neighborhood. This neighborhood is defined by the Ford Park to the east, the Gore Creek
stream tract and Gore Creek Trail to the south, the Vail Village Parking Garage to the west, and the
Town of Vail South Frontage Road and Colorado Department of Transportation/Federal Highways
Administration Interstate 70 to the north. This redevelopment site is located on the outermost
periphery of Vail Village.
130
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 3
East Village Neighborhood, 2025
The Existing Neighborhood
Within this neighborhood exists the Tyrolean Condominiums, the Vail Mountain View Residences,
the Altus Vail Residences, and the Wren Condominiums. A total of nearly 150 dwelling units currently
exists within the neighborhood amongst a mix of residential dwelling units, attached lock -off units,
timeshare units and community housing units. Following the replacement of the Tyrolean Restaurant
(formerly the Blue Cow) with a new residential dwelling unit, and the office uses in The Wren
Condominiums replaced with residential dwelling units, and as directed by the Vail Land Use Plan
and Vail Village Master Plan, no commercial uses remain within this East Vail Village neighborhood.
131
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
The Vail Mountain View Residences and the Altus Vail Residences are the two newest developments
in the neighborhood. Vail Mountain View Residences were completed in 2008 under the High-
Density Multiple Family (HDMF) district. The Altus Vail Residences were completed in 2019 as part
of a newly established special development district (SDD No. 42). At the time of establishment, the
Vail Mountain View Residences were brought into the new special development district. Like the
proposed new Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park, both the Vail Mountain View Residences and
Altus Vail Residences also was an infill residential redevelopment opportunity on the periphery of
Vail Village with its vehicular access via the South Frontage Road.
The new Lunar Vail Residences and redeveloped Apollo Park promises to be welcomed additions to
the Vail community and its East Vail Village neighborhood. As such, the design and development
team look forward to collaborating with the Town of Vail, our neighbors, and the Vail community
through the development review and entitlement processes.
132
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT TEAM DIRECTORY
Owners/Applicants
Ron Byrne
Ron Byrne & Associates, Inc
dba as Lunar Vail Land Investment LLC
285 Bridge Street, Vail, CO. 81657
Shawn Byrne
Ron Byrne & Associates, Inc
dba as Lunar Vail Land Investment LLC
285 Bridge Street, Vail, CO. 81657
Owner’s Representative
Jack Hunn, President
Hunn Consulting Group
P.O. Box 1095
Vail CO. 81658
Architecture & Design Team
Robert “Fitz” Fitzgerald, Principal
NAKA^tecture, LLC
NCARB, Registered Architect
171 Newport St.
Denver, CO 80220
Dimitri Smirniotopoulos
DSI Architects
2690 West Dublin-Granville Road
Columbus, Ohio 43235
Scott Lesicko
DSI Architects
2690 West Dublin-Granville Road
Columbus, Ohio 43235
Jason Wing
Ionâs BIMWORKS
1793 Ivanhoe Street
Denver, CO 80220
Development Review & Entitlements
George Ruther, Principal
Ruther Associates LLC
P.O. Box 6516
Vail, CO. 81658
george@rutherassociates.com
General Contractor
Doug Thompson
Hyder Construction
1031 Santa Fe Drive, Ste. 300
Denver, Colorado 80204
Legal Counsel
Christopher Payne
Ballard Spahr LLP
1225 17th Street, Suite 2300
Denver, CO 80202-5596
Traffic Engineering
Skip Hudson
TurnKey Consulting, LLC
2667 Amber Spring Way
Grand Junction, CO 81506
Environmental Review
Matt Kizlinski
Hemlock Environmental Consulting, LLC
1884 South Corona St.
Denver CO 80210
Fire Protection and Code Consulting
Steve Rondinelli
Rondinelli Life/Safety
15272 West Warren Drive
Lakewood, Colorado
133
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
Geo-Technical Soils Investigation
Ian Cesare
CMT Technical Services
7108 South Alton Way, Bldg. B
Centennial, Colorado 80112
Civil Engineering
Mason Talkington, P.E.
Martin/Martin Civil Engineering
77 Metcalf Road, Suite 301
Avon, Colorado 81620
Apollo Park at Vail
Dave Zessin, President
Apollo Park at Vail HOA
442 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO. 81657
Apollo Park Owner’s Representative
Landscape Design Consultant
Kathy Aalto/Clint Granos
Ceres + Landscape Architecture
P.O. Box 2134
Eagle, Colorado 81631
MEP Consultant
Craig Watts
IMEG Construction Engineering
7600 East Orchard Road, Ste. 250-S
Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111
Structural Design
Craig Carroll
IMEG Construction Engineering
7600 East Orchard Road, Ste. 250-S
Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111
Todd Goulding
Goulding Development Advisors, LLC
PO Box 2308
Edwards, CO 81632
Apollo Park at Vail Legal Counsel
Dan Reynolds
210 Edwards Village Blvd. A105
P.O. Box 2340
Edwards, CO 81632
Architecture/Modeling
Matt Faichnie
FAKEKNEE, LLC
353 Monarch Street
Louisville, CO 80027
134
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 1
SECTION 3 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Lunar Vail Residences, located in both North and South, are a mix of new luxury multi-family
residential condominium development and deed-restricted community housing units, situated on
the outskirts of Vail Village. This mix of residential units continues the established trend of residential
uses in the immediate neighborhood.
Apollo Park is a redevelopment project aimed at signiflcantly upgrading and replacing a nearly 50-
year-old timeshare development located on the site. The Apollo Park HOA Board has invested almost
ten years attempting to implement a redevelopment plan. Previous attempts have proven
unsuccessful, mainly due to the challenges associated with redeveloping a timeshare building with
over 1,700 owners. Apollo Park Timeshare buildings C & D were redeveloped as part of the flrst phase
of redevelopment. The flrst phase of redevelopment resulted in the completion of the Vail Mountain
View Residences and Altus Vail Residences (Special Development District No. 42).
135
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 2
The new development is situated within the context of the East Vail Village neighborhood between
Blue Cow Chute and Gerald R. Ford Park, along the South Frontage Road. Existing residential
developments within the immediate neighborhood include the Tyrolean Condominiums, the Altus
Vail Residences, the Vail Mountain View Residences, and the Wren Condominiums.
Vicinity Map, 2025
A total of sixty-eight new homes and up to 117 fully enclosed vehicle parking spaces will be built in
two separate buildings on the site. The new homes comprise thirty-two new residential
condominiums, 36 redeveloped timeshare units, and eight new deed-restricted homes for
community housing. The on-site community housing units are designed to provide homes for the
property management staff at Apollo Park, as well as other Vail residents who live and work within
the community. According to the Vail Town Code, deed-restricted homes do not contribute to the
allowable density.
136
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 3
Eight on-site, deed-restricted homes will be constructed on the Property. Each home is assigned a
parking space within the new parking garage.
To flt within the context of the neighborhood, the new buildings are flve to six stories tall. The roof
ridge elevation of Apollo Park and the Vail Mountain View Residences is equal at 8,250 feet. The roof
ridge elevation of the Lunar Vail North and Altus Vail Residences is nearly equal in height. As per the
Vail Village Master Plan, upon redevelopment, the Wren Condominiums is also recommended to be
flve to six stories tall. Pursuant to the Vail Village Master Plan, a building story is deflned as ten feet
in height, fioor to fioor, plus up to 12 additional feet of height for a sloping roof form. According to the
Vail Village Master Plan Conceptual Building Height Plan, flve- and six-story buildings are to be
located around the perimeter of Vail Village.
The architectural style and design of the new buildings complement the existing Vail Mountain View
Residences, Altus Vail Residences, and The Wren Condominiums, featuring an assemblage of stone,
stucco, and wood-like siding for exterior building materials. Sloping roof forms are planned for each
of the three buildings. The architectural style, design, and character of the neighborhood have been
established with the recent development of the Vail Mountain View Residences and Altus Vail
Residences. This new style and design will be continued with the development of the Lunar Vail
Residences and Apollo Park. Due to design compatibility requirements, it is likely to be replicated
when, and if, the Wren Condominiums are redeveloped, consistent with the recommendations of the
Vail Village Master Plan.
137
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 4
The new development replaces an existing asphalt surface vehicle parking lot, as recommended for
removal by the Vail Village Master Plan. Surface parking lots are strongly discouraged within Vail
Village speciflcally. As such, more expensive structured parking is required. The fully loaded cost of
structured parking can range from $150,000 to $350,000 per parking space, depending on the
circumstances. This cost needs to be absorbed in the pro forma of the new development.
Existing Apollo Park Surface Parking Lot
All vehicular access to
the site is from the South
Frontage Road.
Pedestrians can access
the site using the
sidewalk along the South
Frontage Road or by
using the Gore Path,
located immediately
south of the site. The Vail
Village Master Plan
discourages
development that
increases the number of
vehicle trips to and
within Vail Village. Pedestrian Site Circulation Diagram
138
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 5
As part of the owner’s amenities package, an outdoor plaza featuring casual seating, gas flre pits,
cooking grills, and swimming pools is incorporated into the landscape design.
Plaza Level Amenities
A thoughtfully planned landscape design, including two rooftop planting areas, balances visual
aesthetics, flre-wise protection, visual screening, and year-round appeal into the overall design of
139
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 6
the buildings and site. Low-level, entirely cut-off landscape light flxtures not only comply with the
Town’s outdoor lighting standards, but they also minimize undesirable light pollution. To maintain
visual integrity and neighborhood compatibility, architectural site walls are proposed to mirror those
existing within the neighborhood along the entirety of the Vail Mountain View Residences and Altus
Vail Residences property. An additional flve-foot-wide landscaped area on the Town of Vail stream
tract is proposed to further visually screen the new buildings from the view of the Gore Path below
and further designate the separation of uses. Given the use of native vegetation, the added
landscaping has the support of the Town of Vail Environmental Sustainability Department.
Rooftop Terrace
To facilitate this new development, three development review applications have been submitted to
the Town of Vail for review and approval. A fourth application will be submitted to amend the
subdivision plat and create a new condominium map following flnal approvals of the initial three
applications. The three development applications include:
1) Creation of a new special development district,
2) An amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan, and
3) An amendment to an existing conditional use permit.
140
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 1
SECTION 4 – BACKGROUND
The applicant presented to the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission. The
flrst presentation was a worksession meeting on April 28, 2025. The second and third
presentations were public hearings held on September 8 and 22, 2025, respectively. Each
time, the design and development team presented revisions to the proposed development
applications in response to feedback received from the Commission, Town staff, and the
public.
The list of revisions includes:
• A reduction in the height of both the North Building and the Apollo Park Building.
• Reductions in the bulk, mass, and scale of the North Building.
• Increased step backs in the North Building on both the south and north facades.
• A further increase in the west side setback.
• A reduction in the density of flve residential dwelling units to 68 units.
• A further reduction in total GRFA.
• A further increase in the number of on-site EHU's.
• An increase in the front setback along the South Frontage Road.
• Changes in site grading on the southeast and southwest corners of the development
site,
• An increase in landscaping along the east side property line.
• A change to the design of the parking garage ramp to lessen the encroachment on
the west side setback.
• A substantial reduction in the amount of parking on Parking Level P0.
• An added landscape screening buffer along the east, west, and south sides of the
Lunar Vail Residences South building and Apollo Park building, and
• Increased articulation, both horizontal and vertical, of the new residential buildings.
The presentations included an updated sun/shade analysis and an animated 3-D model of
the proposed building and neighborhood. Additionally, the design and development team
worked to address all the questions raised at the meetings on April 28, September 8, and
September 22.
141
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 2
A. Subdivision and Plat Mapping
On November 4, 1965, the original plat map of the Vail Village Fifth Filing Subdivision was
approved by the Eagle County Planning Commission, establishing Tract D, Vail Village Fifth
Filing. According to Town of Vail
records, Tract D has been re-
subdivided four times since
then. These four re-
subdivisions facilitated the
development of The Wren
Condominiums, Apollo Park,
Apollo Park Lodge, and the
Tyrolean Condominiums. The
Vail Mountain View Residences
and Altus Vail Residences
would subsequently be built on
a re-subdivided portion of Tract
D, on the former site of the
Apollo Park Lodge, Buildings C
and D.
Vail Village Fifth Filing, 1965
On September 5, 1978, a condominium map of the Apollo Park at Vail Association was
recorded by the Eagle County Recorder ’s Office. Pursuant to Town of Vail Subdivision
regulations, a condominium map shall be recorded following construction of the structures
approved by the Town for development on the parcel. In this instance, the condominium
map for Buildings A and B
was platted and recorded. To
be noted is the approved
location of the structures
relative to the east, west, and
south property lines. The
Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission
granted a prior property
owner a variance to build
within the prescribed setback
areas of the property. Of
further importance, a
condominium map differs
Subject Site
TRACT D
142
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 3
from a subdivision plat map in that it does not establish property boundary lines for land
subdivision.
Subsequently, an amended condominium plat map was recorded, establishing the
approved locations of Buildings C and D, Apollo Park Lodge. Buildings C and D were
developed following the
completion of Buildings A
and B. For purposes of
zoning, the locations of
Buildings A, B, C, and D
did not conform to the
setback requirements for
development in the
prescribed zone district.
In 2007, Buildings C and D
were razed to allow for the
development of the Vail
Mountain View
Residences, Phase I.
Apollo Park Buildings A, B, C, & D, Condominium Map, 1979
On August 14, 2006, the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission approved a
minor subdivision creating a Final Plat, Lot 1, A Re-subdivision of a Part of Tract D, Vail Village
Fifth Filing. This new Lot 1 would eventually become the development site of the Vail
Mountain View
Residences, Phase I.
Phase I of the Vail
Mountain View
Residences was
developed as a use by
right within the High-
Density Multiple
Family Zone District.
The development was
approved, with a
second phase of
development having
been contemplated.
Lot 1, Vail Village Fifth Filing
143
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 4
Site Plan, Phase II, Vail Mountain View Residences, 2017
In 2017, Phase II of the Vail Mountain View Residences (Altus Vail Residences) was approved
on the northern one-half of Lot 1, Vail Village Fifth Filing. Phase II completed the
development planned and approved for Lot 1. Each phase of the Vail Mountain View
Residences was developed as part of Special Development District No. 42. This district
included deviations from the development standards for GRFA, density, building height, site
coverage, and landscape area. The recommendations of the Vail Village Master Plan could
not have been realized without the adoption of a special development district.
According to the Town of Vail flles, when the Vail Village Master Plan was adopted in 1990,
the Town recognized that the HDMF district was misaligned with the existing development
patterns in the East Frontage Road sub -area and the potential for future growth. The Master
Plan recommended updating the zoning. However, no substantive modiflcations have
occurred. This creates the need to redevelop this property as a special development district,
as was done for Vail Mountain View Residences and Altus Vail Residences. Other properties
in the neighborhood, such as the Wren Condominiums and the Tyrolean Condominiums, do
not comply with zoning and are non-conforming with respect to setbacks, GRFA, density,
site coverage, and building height.
144
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 5
A recently updated
2025 ALTA survey,
showing the “as-
built” conditions of
the Apollo Park site,
has been
completed. The
survey accurately
identifles the
existing location of
the structures and
improvements on
the site's surface,
including Buildings
A and B, the site's
topography, the surface parking lot, and the swimming pool amenity. It also notes the
location of recorded easements and below-grade utilities, including water, sewer, electric,
and natural gas. Notably, a 30-foot-wide Eagle River Water and Sanitation District water and
sewer easement traverses the Property east-west. Existing topography, vegetation, and
conditions immediately adjacent to the site are provided.
B. Land Use and Zoning
The Vail Town Council adopted the Vail Land Use Plan, subject to the passage of Resolution
No. 27, Series of 1986. The Vail Land Use Plan has served the Vail community well over its
nearly 40-year existence. The Land Use Plan has been used as a guiding document in the
development and redevelopment of properties throughout Vail. Having been approved for
amendments six times since its original adoption, the Vail Land Use Plan remains a relevant
planning document to this day. The Vail Land Use Plan is intended to serve as a basis from
which future decisions may be made regarding land use within Vail.
According to the Vail Land Use Plan, the Property maintains a land use designation of Vail
Village Master Plan. That said, future development on the Property is to be guided by the
recommendations contained within the framework of the Vail Village Master Plan.
145
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 6
Vail Land Use Plan, Town of Vail
The recommendations prescribed within the Vail Village Master Plan for development on the
Property and the adjacent properties are more fully described herein.
According to the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail,
the Property is located within the High-Density Multiple
Family (“HDMF”) district. The Property has been within
the HDMF district since its original incorporation into
the Town of Vail.
Official Zoning Map, Town of Vail
First established in 1973, the HDMF district is intended to provide sites for multiple-family
dwellings at densities of up to 25 dwelling units per acre, together with public and semi-
public facilities, lodges, private recreation facilities, and related visitor-oriented uses that
may be appropriately located in the same zone district. The HDMF district is intended to
ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities commensurate with high-
density apartment, condominium, and lodge uses, and to maintain the desirable residential
and resort qualities of the zone district by establishing appropriate site development
146
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 7
standards. Speciflc nonresidential uses are permitted as conditional uses, which relate to
the nature of Vail as a winter and summer recreation and vacation community and, where
permitted, are intended to blend harmoniously with the residential character of the zone
district.
According to Town flles, the HDMF district has been amended three times since its
inception. Each of these amendments was minor in nature. Some of the Town’s more
densely populated residential neighborhoods are located within special development
districts with an underlying zoning designation of HDMF. No substantial amendments to the
HDMF district have occurred since the 1990 adoption of the Vail Village Master Plan.
The Town of Vail has consistently relied upon special development districts to further the
purposes of the Zoning Regulations of the Town of Vail and achieve the development goals
and objectives outlined in Section 12-1-2(B), Speciflc Purposes, of the Vail Town Code. Today,
as many as 43 Special Development Districts have been approved in the Town of Vail. Most
recently, Special Development District No. 42, Vail Mountain View Residences, Phase I and
Phase II, was approved, featuring densities exceeding 25 dwelling units per acre and
buildings up to 70 feet in height. Each was granted deviations from GRFA requirements,
including density, building height, site coverage, landscaping, and setback requirements.
Special Development Districts in the vicinity of the Apollo Park (Town of Vail flles)
147
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 8
The height of buildings has been a crucial consideration in urban design for the Village's built
environment since Vail’s inception. To that end, in 1990, with the adoption of the Vail Village
Master Plan, a Conceptual Building Height Plan was adopted to serve as a framework for
future development and guide decision-making on development applications. The
Conceptual Plan acknowledges that taller structures are suitable around the perimeter of
Vail Village and along the South Frontage Road. Taller structures, most up to flve to six
stories tall, were deemed appropriate to aid in framing the context of Vail Village and serve
as a noise and visual barrier from the impacts of Interstate-70. And while private views are
not protected, taller buildings around the periphery have minimal to no adverse effect on the
most desirable southerly views of Vail Mountain.
According to the Town of Vail's records, there are flve structures developed around the
perimeter of Vail Village that have been approved for building heights of 70 feet or greater.
Some are in areas recommended by the Conceptual Building Height Plan to have building
heights of four to flve stories (i.e., 52, 62’). These flve structures include:
• Four Seasons Hotel – SDD #36 (+/- 89 ft.)
• Sebastian Hotel – SDD #6 (+/- 77 ft.)*
• Vail Village Inn – SDD #6 (+/- 71 ft.)
• Solaris – SDD #39 (+/- 99ft.)
• Vail Mountain View Residences/Altus Vail Residences – SDD #42 (+/- 70)*
* denotes deviation from the Vail Village Master Plan Conceptual Building Height Plan recommendation.
As demonstrated, deviations from the maximum building height limitation and the
Conceptual Building Height Plan recommendations are commonly approved. This is
especially relevant given the approved building height of the Altus Vail Residences and the
proposed building height of the Lunar Vail Residences North. The overall impact of building
height is far greater for the Altus Vail Residences, given its orientation on the site.
Building Height Comparison
148
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 9
C. Development History
Historically speaking, and as recently as 20 years ago, the East Vail Village Neighborhood
area of Vail Village was characterized by high-density residential development with three-
and four-story buildings and vast amounts of surface parking. The surface vehicle parking
lots at both Apollo Park Buildings A, B, C, and D, and The Wren Condominiums, are
nonconforming
and do not
comply with the
parking
requirements of
the HDMF
district.
Continuing this
pattern of
development is
discouraged by
the Vail Village
Master Plan
(adopted 1990).
Instead, it
identifles this
neighborhood
as an area
situated on the
periphery of Vail
Village's core, with substantial inflll redevelopment opportunities. The only commercial
development in this neighborhood was the Tyrolean Restaurant (formerly known as the Blue
Cow). The Tyrolean Restaurant was redeveloped in 2007 and converted into the largest
residential dwelling unit in the area. The Wren Condominiums and the Tyrolean
Condominiums are also non-conforming with respect to density (du’s/acre), GRFA,
setbacks, and site coverage. The only conforming structures in this East Vail Village
neighborhood are the Vail Mountain View Residences and the Altus Vail Residences.
Conformity was achieved through the fiexibility afforded by a special development district.
149
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 10
The Apollo Park Lodge has undergone little to no substantial redevelopment since its original
construction in the early 1970s. A review of the Town of Vail flles indicates that the most
signiflcant improvement to Buildings A and B is the replacement of electrical wiring and the
replacement of the roofs. Even though both Buildings are wood-framed construction, and
each has been notifled of the need for a flre sprinkler system, neither has undergone the
necessary flre prevention work. A new swimming pool was added to the Property in 2007 to
replace an existing one that was demolished to accommodate the development of the Vail
Mountain View Residences. Unfortunately, despite $2.5 billion of private sector investments
made within the Vail community during the six years from 2003 to 2008, none of that
investment went into the Apollo Park buildings.
Timeline of Apollo Park Redevelopment
The timeline above visually represents the changes to the conflguration of Part of Tract D,
Vail Village, Fifth Filing, from 1970 to 2019. As of today, Buildings C and D at Apollo Park have
been entirely replaced by the Vail Mountain View Residences and Altus Vail Residences, two
multi-family residential developments. Note the replacement of the vast expanse of pre-
existing asphalt surface parking lot with new residential buildings and fully enclosed parking
garages. But for Apollo Park Buildings A and B, and The Wren Condominiums, surface
parking within this East Vail Village neighborhood is nonexistent. Those, too, will likely be
replaced with future redevelopment. However, given the number of timeshare ownership
interests within each property, creative solutions to redevelopment will be necessary to
achieve the Town’s development goals and objectives, as well as to implement the
recommendations outlined in the Vail Village Master Plan. There are more than 1,700
timeshare owners at Apollo Park and 1,900 at the Wren Condominiums. As demonstrated
elsewhere in Vail, this number of owners further complicates redevelopment efforts.
150
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 11
2004 Aerial Image, Town of Vail
In 2017, the Vail Town Council approved Special Development District No. 42. SDD No. 42
approved the redevelopment of the western half of Apollo Park, Buildings C and D. As part
of the redevelopment, Buildings C and D were demolished and replaced with the Vail
Mountain View Residences, Phase I. This flrst phase of redevelopment included the
development of 24 residential dwelling units and a partially buried, fully enclosed parking
garage with a total of 111 parking spaces. The parking spaces provided in excess of the
requirement for the Phase I development were temporarily leased to the public for a
specifled period until Phase II (Altus Vail Residences) was entitled and constructed.
Phase II, Altus Vail Residences, increased the total number of dwelling units on the site to
38, comprising 20 attached accommodation units and 15 community housing units. This
approved increase in development rights brought the total allowable GRFA to 75,280 square
feet, or 133% of the lot area. Notably, according to the Town Code, the 15 community
housing units and 13,992 square feet of GRFA are exempt from density calculations. Had
they been included, the total number of dwelling units would have increased to 53 units, and
the GRFA would have risen to 89,272 square feet, representing a 158% increase. The height
of the building was approved at 70 feet, which includes three levels of parking garage, with
two levels of the garage fully exposed on the south and west sides of the building.
151
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 12
The following Zoning Analysis summarizes the approval of the development standards
granted for Special Development District No. 42, Vail Mountain View Residences, pursuant
to Ordinance No. 9, Series of 2017.
Source: Town of Vail files
152
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 13
2018 Aerial Imagery, Town of Vail
Altus Vail Residences, Phase II, 2017
153
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 14
D. Existing Conditions
Today, more than 150 dwelling units, timeshare units, and attached accommodation units
exist within the East Vail Village neighborhood. This includes nine dwelling units within the
Tyrolean Condominiums, 24 dwellings within the Vail Mountain View Residences, 30
dwelling units and 20 attached lock-off accommodation units in the Altus Vail Residences
(formerly Vail Mountain View Residences, Phase II), 51 dwelling units within The Wren
Condominiums, and 40 timeshare units within Apollo Park. Of these properties, arguably,
Apollo Park is the most outdated and is showing its age. After nearly flfty years, Apollo Park
is poised for redevelopment.
Apollo Park, 2025 North Elevation Apollo Park, 2025 Surface Parking Lot
Apollo Park, 2025, South Elevation Apollo Park, 2025, East Property Line
154
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 15
E. Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission Worksession and
Public Hearings
The Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park design and development presented conceptual
plans to the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) during a
worksession meeting on April 28, 2025 (Present - Litner, Rediker, Hagedorn, Jensen, and
Lipnick)( Absent- Tucker). Following the conceptual presentation and discussion, the PEC
offered the following feedback:
• Compare the approved deviations of SDD #42 to the proposed deviations for SDD
#44.
• Present a proposed massing model including views from the South Frontage Road of
the enclosed parking garage.
• Illustrate the proposed height of the North Building in context with the Altus Vail
Residences.
• Hagedorn asked about massing, views from the frontage road regarding the parking
garage.
• Highlight areas of conformity and compliance with the objectives and policies of the
Vail Village Master Plan.
• Discuss how both the on-site and off-site deed-restricted housing proposals net
incremental new deed-restricted housing inventory. Not creating inventory. View
corridors to be discussed.
• Present the trade-offs and public beneflts realized as a result of the proposed
development.
• Explore and present ways to lessen the appearance of the building mass along the
South Frontage Road elevation.
• Present a Deed-Restricted Housing Plan and address how the proposed development
advances the adopted Town of Vail Housing Goal.
• In response to neighbor input, answer questions regarding communications with
adjacent property owners, building height, density, traffic circulation, setbacks, view
corridors, and effects upon sun/shade of neighboring uses.
• Explore options to reduce the parking garage by one fioor in height above grade.
A complete copy of the PEC Meeting Results, dated 04.28.25, has been attached for
reference.
Finally, the design team has utilized the last flve months to continue meeting with the
adjoining property owners and Town staff to address issues and concerns. For instance, the
design team has met with Vail Fire three times to understand and address the life safety and
emergency vehicle access needs of the new development. Additionally, the design team
met with the Town of Vail's Engineer to understand the design requirements for access
improvements located in the Town of Vail/CDOT right-of-way. Further, the design team has
155
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 16
met on numerous occasions with representatives of the Eagle River Water and Sanitation
District and Holy Cross Energy to incorporate utility design standards and requirements into
the proposed development plan.
A highly experienced design and development team, all with extensive knowledge and
experience participating on development project teams in Vail, has been assembled. To
date, the team continues to vet various options and considerations, meeting frequently with
Town staff and other public agencies to ensure that red-fiag issues are identifled early and
addressed in the conceptual design process.
Revisions made to the proposed development plans since the April 2025 PEC worksession
meeting include:
• Stepping back of the upper levels of the Lunar Vail Residences North Building along
the South Frontage Road to ensure sunlight onto the South Frontage Road.
• Reconflgured the parking garage layout to increase the west side setback to 6 feet
from 1 foot. This condition occurs at a single point as a result of the unique
conflguration of the west property line.
• Increased the number of parking garage levels buried below grade. Two and a half
levels are fully buried.
• Increased the number of parking spaces to 133 total
• Recessed the P0 Parking Level garage entry door to improve the overall aesthetics and
street presence of the Lunar Vail Residences North building.
• Reduced the height of the Apollo Park roof ridge elevation to match the ridge height
elevation of the Vail Mountain View Residences. (@+/- 8,251)
• Designed the South Frontage Road access to fully comply with Town of Vail and
Colorado Department of Transportation requirements.
• Redesigned the mechanical equipment venting to discharge exhaust out of the top
level of the Lunar Vail Residences North building.
Revisions made to the proposed development plans since the September 8 and 22 PEC
public hearings include:
• A reduction in the height of both the North Building and the Apollo Park Building.
• Reductions in the bulk, mass, and scale of the North Building.
• Increased step backs in the North Building on both the south and north facades.
• A further increase in the west side setback.
• A reduction in the density of flve residential dwelling units to 68 units.
• A further reduction in total GRFA.
• A further increase in the number of on-site EHU's.
• An increase in the front setback along the South Frontage Road.
156
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 17
• Changes in site grading on the southeast and southwest corners of the development
site,
• An increase in landscaping along the east side property line.
• A change to the design of the parking garage ramp to lessen the encroachment on
the west side setback.
• A substantial reduction in the amount of parking on Parking Level P0.
• An added landscape screening buffer along the east, west, and south sides of the
Lunar Vail Residences South building and Apollo Park building, and
• Increased articulation, both horizontal and vertical, of the new residential buildings.
These revisions were made in response to feedback received during meetings with the
Board members representing Vail Mountain View Residences and Altus Vail Residences.
157
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 1
SECTION 5 - PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
To facilitate the new development of the Lunar Vail Residences and the redevelopment of Apollo
Park, three development review applications are required. A fourth application will be submitted
following the approval of the initial three applications. This section of the document identifles the
development review applications needed and provides the context of their role in the proposed
development project. A written response to the criteria for review for each of the three development
applications is provided in Section 10 of this document.
The following development review applications were submitted to the Town of Vail Community
Development on July 28, 2025, for the Town’s review and approvals:
1. Creation of Special Development District No. 44 (Title 12, Chapter 9, Vail Town Code)
The purpose of the Special Development District is to encourage fiexibility and creativity in the
development of land to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design character and
quality of the new development with the town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision
of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas; and to further
the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan. An approved
development plan for a Special Development District, in conjunction with the property’s underlying
zone district, shall establish the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included
in the Special Development District. An application for approval of a Special Development District
may be flled by any owner of property to be included in the Special Development District or his or her
agent or authorized representative. Before site preparation, building construction, or other
improvements to land within a Special Development District can commence, an approved
development plan for the district must be in place. The approved development plan shall establish
requirements that regulate development, uses, and activities within a Special Development District.
An approved development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses, and
activities of Special Development Districts. A development plan shall be approved by ordinance by
the Town Council in conjunction with the review and approval of any Special Development District.
The development plan shall contain all relevant material and information necessary to establish the
parameters with which the Special Development District shall develop. The development plan may
consist of, but not be limited to, the approved site plan, fioor plans, building sections and elevations,
vicinity plan, parking plan, preliminary open space/landscape plan, densities, and permitted,
conditional, and accessory uses.
Development standards, including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control, site
coverage, landscaping, and parking, shall be determined by the Town Council as part of the approved
development plan, with consideration of the recommendations of the Planning and Environmental
Commission. Before the Town Council approves development standards that deviate from the
underlying zone district, it should be determined that such deviation provides benefits to the town
that outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation. This determination is to be made based on
evaluation of the proposed Special Development District’s compliance with the design criteria
outlined in the Vail Town Code.
158
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 2
Proposed deviations to the development standards of the underlying zone district include:
• Setbacks,
• Height,
• Density control,
• Site coverage,
• Landscaping, and
• Parking
For reference, a summary of the proposed development standards can be found in Section 8 herein
2. Amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan (Section VIII Vail Village Master Plan)
The Master Plan recommends both public and private improvements on properties throughout Vail
Village. As a result, it is a guide for private property owners and the Town to use when evaluating
future development opportunities. The Master Plan provides the Town with direction when
formulating capital improvement programs and establishes standards for reviewing development
proposals on private land. The most signiflcant element of the Master Plan is the Goals, Objectives,
Policies, and Action Steps. These are the working tools of the Master Plan. They establish the broad
framework and vision, but also lay out the speciflc policies and action steps that will be used to
implement them. The six goals, along with their related objectives and policies, are outlined in
Section V of the Vail Village Master Plan. Each objective is implemented through one or more policies
and action steps. Below is a list highlighting the goals, related objectives, and policies relevant and
applicable to the new Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park redevelopment. (Note: Bold text below
indicates special emphasis added within the sub-area recommendations for development on the
Property).
GOAL #1 ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY, REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING UNIQUE
ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND
IDENTITY.
Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and
commercial facilities.
Policy 1.2.1: Additional development may be allowed as identified by the Action
Plan and as is consistent with the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design
Guide Plan.
Policy 1.2.2: Development and improvement projects shall be coordinated to
minimize the unintended negative consequences associated with construction
activity in a pedestrianized, commercial area. For instance, the noise
abatement, project completion guarantees, temporary parking, traffic control,
etc.
Objective 1.3: Enhance new development and redevelopment through public improvements
done by private developers working in cooperation with the town.
Policy 1.3.1: Public improvements shall be developed with the participation of the
private sector working with the Town.
GOAL #2 TO FOSTER A STRONG TOURIST INDUSTRY AND PROMOTE YEAR-AROUND ECONOMIC
HEALTH AND VIABILITY FOR THE VILLAGE AND FOR THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE.
159
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 3
Objective 2.1: Recognize the variety of land uses found in the 11 sub -areas throughout the
Village and allow for development that is compatible with these established land use
patterns.
Policy 2.1.1: The zoning code and development review criteria shall be consistent
with the overall goals and objectives- of the Vail Village Master Plan.
Objective 2.2: Recognize the importance of Vail Village as a mixed-use center of activities for
our guests, visitors and residents.
Policy 2.2.1: The design criteria in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan shall be
the primary guiding document to preserve the existing architectural scale and character of
the core area of Vail Village.
Objective 2.3: Increase the number of residential units available for short term
overnight accommodations.
Policy 2.3.1: The development of short-term accommodation units is strongly
encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing density levels are
required to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available for short
term overnight rental.
Objective 2.5: Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing
lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests.
Policy 2.5.1: Recreation amenities, common areas, meeting facilities and other
amenities shall be preserved and enhanced as a part of any redevelopment of lodging
properties.
Policy 2.5.2: The town will use the maximum fiexibility possible in the interpretation
of building and flre codes in order to facilitate building renovations without compromising life,
health and safety considerations.
Objective 2.6: Encourage the development of employee housing units in Vail Village
through the efforts of the private sector.
Policy 2.6.1: Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or
redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by existing zoning.
Policy 2.6.2: Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate restrictions
so as to insure their availability and affordability to the local work force.
Policy 2.6.3: The Town of Vail may facilitate in the development of affordable housing
by providing appropriate assistance.
Policy 2.6.4: Employee housing shall be developed in the Village when required by
the Town’s adopted Zoning Regulations.
GOAL #3 TO RECOGNIZE AS A TOP PRIOTITY THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE WALKING EXPERIENCE
THROUGHOUT THE VILLAGE
160
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
Objective 3.1: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other
improvements.
Policy 3.1.1: Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting and seating areas),
along adjacent pedestrian ways.
Policy 3.1.2: Public art and other similar landmark features shall be encouraged
at appropriate locations throughout the Town.
Policy 3.1.3: Flowers, trees, water features, and other landscaping shall be
encouraged throughout the Town in locations adjacent to, or visible from, public areas.
Objective 3.2: Minimize the amount of vehicular traffic in the Village to the greatest extent
possible.
Policy 3.2.1: Vehicular traffic will be eliminated or reduced to absolute minimal
necessary levels in the pedestrianized areas of the Village.
Objective 3.4: Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible
green space areas, including pocket parks and stream access.
Policy 3.4.1: Physical improvements to property adjacent to stream tracts shall
not further restrict public access.
Policy 3.4.2: Private development projects shall be required to incorporate new
sidewalks along streets adjacent to the project as designated in the Vail Village Master
Plan and/or Recreation Trails Master Plan.
Policy 3.4.3: The “privatization” of the town-owned Gore Creek stream tract shall
be strongly discouraged.
Policy 3.4.4: Encroachment of private improvements on the town-owned Gore
Creek stream tract shall be prohibited.
Policy 3.4.5: The Town shall require the removal of existing improvements
constructed without the Town’s consent within the town-owned Gore Creek stream
tract.
GOAL #4 TO PRESERVE EXISTING OPEN SPACE AREAS AND EXPAND GREENSPACE
OPPORTUNITIES.
Objective 4.1: Improve existing open space areas and create new plazas with greenspace
and pocket parks. Recognize the different roles of each type of open space in forming the overall
fabric of the Village.
Policy 4.1.1: Active recreation facilities shall be preserved (or relocated to accessible
locations elsewhere in the Village) in any development or redevelopment of property in Vail
Village.
161
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 5
Policy 4.1.2: The development of new public plazas, and improvements to existing
plazas (public art, landmarks, historic features, streetscape features, seating areas, etc.)
shall be strongly encouraged to reinforce their roles as attractive people places.
Policy 4.1.3: With the exception of ski base-related facilities, existing natural open
space areas at the base of Vail Mountain and throughout Vail Village and existing greenspaces
shall be preserved as open space.
Policy 4.1.4: Open space improvements including the addition of accessible
greenspace as described or graphically shown in the Vail Village Master Plan and/or Urban
Design Guide Plan, will be required in conjunction with private inflll or redevelopment
projects.
GOAL #5 INCREASE AND IMPROVE THE CAPACITY, EFFICIENCY, AND AESTHETICS OF THE
TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE VILLAGE.
Objective 5.1: Meet parking demands with public and private parking facilities
Policy 5.1.1: For new development that is located outside of the Commercial Core I
Zone District, on-site parking shall be provided (rather than paying into the parking fund) to
meet any additional parking demand as required by the zoning code.
Policy 5.1.3: Seek locations for additional structured public and private parkin g.
Policy 5.1.4: Continue to promote the lease parking program as a means for
maximizing the utilization of private parking spaces.
Policy 5.1.5: Redevelopment projects shall be strongly encouraged to provide
underground or visually concealed parking.
Policy 5.1.6: Development and redevelopment projects shall be strongly encouraged
to provide ample temporary parking for construction workers for the duration of a
construction project to minimize impacts on our guests and visitors resulting from the loss of
public parking.
Objective 5.4: Improve the streetscape circulation corridors throughout the Village.
Policy 5.4.1: The Town shall work with the Colorado Division of Highways toward
the implementation of a landscaped boulevard and parkway along the South Frontage
Road.
Policy 5.4.2: Medians and right-of -ways shall be landscaped.
GOAL #6 TO ENSURE THE CONTINUED IMPROVEMENT OF THE VITAL OPERATIONAL ELEMENTS OF
THE VILLAGE.
Objective 6.1: Provide service and delivery facilities for existing and new development.
Objective 6.2: Provide for the safe and efficient functions of flre, police and public utilities
within the context of an aesthetically pleasing resort setting.
162
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 6
Policy 6.2.1: Development projects and other improvements in Vail Village shall be
reviewed by respective Town departments to identify both the impacts of the proposal and
potential mitigating measures.
Policy 6.2.2: Minor improvements (landscaping, decorative paving, open dining
decks, etc.), may be permitted on Town of Vail land or right-of-way (with review and approval
by the Town Council and Planning and Environmental Commission when applicable) if Town
operations such as snow removal, street maintenance and flre department access and
operation are able to be maintained at current levels. Special design (i.e. heated pavement),
maintenance fees, or other considerations may be required to offset impacts on Town
services.
The following citations from the Vail Village Master Plan provide reference and context to the Plan’s
intended purposes and role in the development review process:
“The Vail Village Master Plan is not intended to be regulatory in nature but is intended to provide a
general framework to guide decision making.” VVMP August, 2012
“There is a need to continually maintain
and upgrade the quality of existing
buildings, as well as streets, walks and
utility services. Vail's economy relies to a
large degree on maintaining its overall
status and attractiveness as a world-class
resort.” VVMP August, 2012
“…a consensus emerged that additional
development was acceptable, even
desirable, as long as it did not significantly
alter the existing character of the Village.”
VVMP, August, 2012
“Upgrading buildings - Vail Village has not
escaped the aging process. There is a need to encourage the continued upgrading and enhancement
of existing lodging and commercial facilities within the Village in order to maintain the unique
character that is its main attraction.” VVMP, August 2012
“The building height element formalizes the pattern that has evolved in the Village --low buildings in
the core area with larger buildings on the northern periphery (along South Frontage Road), with
openings framing views of Vail-Mountain” VVMP, August 2012
“It is important to note that the likelihood of project approval will be greatest for those proposals that
can fully comply with the Vail Village Master Plan.” VVMP, August 2012
Subject Site
Village Core
163
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 7
BUILDING HEIGHT PLAN
Generally speaking, it is the goal of
this Plan to maintain the
concentration of low-scale buildings
in the core area while positioning
larger buildings along the northern
periphery (along the Frontage Road),
as depicted in the Building Height
Proflle Plan. This pattern has already
been established, and in some cases,
these larger structures along the
Frontage Road serve to frame views
over Vail Village to Vail Mountain. The
Building Height Plan also strives, in
some areas, to preserve major views
from public rights-of-way.
The building heights expressed on this Illustrative Plan are intended as general guidelines. Additional
study should be conducted during the speciflc project review to assess the impact of a building's
height on the streetscape and its relationship to surrounding structures. Speciflc design
considerations on building heights are found in the Sub -Area section of this Plan and in the Vail
Village Urban Design Guide Plan.
A primary goal of this Plan is to
address the Village as a whole, while
also being sensitive to the
opportunities and constraints that
may exist on a site-speciflc basis. To
facilitate long-range planning
unique to each area of the Village,
ten different sub-areas are
delineated in this Plan.
Each of the ten sub -areas has been
evaluated relative to the overall
goals, objectives, and policies
outlined for Vail Village. The
potential improvement projects,
referred to as sub-area concepts,
which have emerged from this evaluation, are graphically represented on the Action Plan. These sub-
area concepts are physical improvements intended to reinforce the desired physical form of the
Village as outlined in the various elements of the Master Plan.
Subject
Site
Subject Site East Frontage Road
Sub-Area #9
164
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 8
The 10 sub-areas (which follow) provide detailed descriptions of each sub-area concept and express
the relationship between the speciflc sub -area concepts and the Plan. The applicable goals and
objectives are cited for each sub-area concept at the end of each description, under "Special
Emphasis." The sub-area concepts described in this Section are meant to serve as advisory
guidelines for future land use decisions by the Planning and Environmental Commission and the
Town Council.
The East Frontage Road Sub-Area
comprises condominium and
timeshare residential development.
This sub-area is unique in that its
access is directly off of the Frontage
Road, causing little vehicular impact
on other areas of the Village. Large
areas of surface parking within the
sub-area provide the opportunity for
additional residential inflll
development. Given proper attention
to design considerations, this sub -
area could provide additional density
within close proximity to the Village core. At present, the sub-area is separated from the Village core
by Gore Creek. This sub-area has a pedestrian connection with the Village and Ford Park via the
Village Streamwalk. The area between buildings and Gore Creek must be improved to enhance
natural environment.
#9-1 Parking Lot Inflll Residential inflll over
existing surface parking. Height of building to
be limited so as not to impede view corridors
from the Frontage Road (and Interstate 70) to
the Village and Vail Mountain. Mass of
buildings to step back from the Frontage
Road to prevent sun/shade impacts on the
road. Satisfying parking demand on site will
necessitate structured parking. A substantial
landscape buffer shall be provided between
any new development and the Frontage Road
without jeopardizing future frontage road
improvements. Special emphasis on 1.2,
2.3, 2.6, 3.1, 3.4, 5.4, 6.1.
Lunar Vail intends to submit a development
application proposing amendments to the
East Frontage Road sub-area of the Vail
Village Master Plan relating to the Building
Height Plan and Action Plan. The proposed
165
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 9
amendments continue to ensure compatibility amongst surrounding and potential uses in the area
and maintain the developing character of the neighborhood. To amend the Vail Village Master Plan,
it shall be the responsibility of Lunar Vail to demonstrate compliance with one or more of the
following:
• How conditions have changed since the Plan was adopted,
• How the Plan is in error, or
• How the addition, deletion, or change to the Plan is in concert with the Plan in general.
Proposed Amendment Highlighted in RED.
The proposed amendment allows for a recommended building height of 5-6 stories for the southerly
portion of the Property. The redeveloped Apollo Park building is proposed to be six stories tall, and
the Lunar Vail Residences South building is proposed to be flve stories tall, respectively. The
northerly portion of the Property is already recommended for building heights up to six stories tall,
which aligns with the Wren Condominiums property. Notably, according to the Master Plan, the Altus
Vail Residences site was recommended for building heights of up to four stories. In 2017, a six-story
tall building was approved, subject to Ordinance No. 9, Series of 2017. This proposed amendment
results in greater consistency, compatibility, and character within the East Frontage Road Sub-Area,
as well as bringing the Altus Vail Residences into conformity. Eight other properties around the
perimeter of Vail Village are developed or recommended at heights of flve to six stories tall.
166
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 10
3. Amendment to an Existing Conditional Use Permit (Title 12, Chapter 16, Vail Town Code)
A conditional use permit is intended to provide the fiexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of
the zoning regulations in the Vail Town Code. Because of their unusual or special characteristics,
conditional uses require review and evaluation to ensure they are appropriately located in relation to
the purposes of the Zoning Regulations and their impact on surrounding properties. The review
process prescribed is intended to ensure compatibility and harmonious development between
conditional uses and surrounding properties, as well as the Vail community at large. Uses listed as
conditional uses in the various districts may be permitted subject to such conditions and limitations
as may be prescribed to ensure that the location and operation of a conditional use will be in
accordance with the development objectives of the Town and will not be detrimental to other uses
or properties.
The Administrator may approve amendments to an existing conditional use permit (including, but not
limited to, additions to buildings and structures associated with the use, changes to the operation of
the use, changes to the previous conditions of approval, and the like) if the Administrator determines
the amendment meets the following criteria:
(1) The amendment is in accordance with all applicable elements of this code and the
Vail Comprehensive Plan;
(2) The amendment does not alter the basic character or intent of the original conditional
use permit; and
(3) The amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare.
All amendments to an existing conditional use permit not meeting the above-listed criteria, as
determined by the Administrator, shall be reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission
in accordance with the procedures described in the Vail Town Code.
Pursuant to Section 12-6H-3(R), Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, timeshare units are allowed in
the HDMF district, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit. As shared, the Apollo Park
timeshare units were created and have been continuously operated on the Property since before
1990.
The Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park design and development team looks forward to
collaborating with the Vail Town Council, the Town’s review boards, the Town staff, and the Vail
community throughout the development review and entitlement processes.
167
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 1
SECTION 6 – DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING PROGRAM
This section of the document provides a written summary and visual references of the overall
development and building program proposed on the Property. A complete set of development plans
and a detailed description of the proposed development standards, including a breakdown of uses
and square footage, can be found in Sections 7 and 8, respectively, of this document.
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park are intended to be Vail’s newest high-end, multi-family
residential development. Within a short walking distance of Vail Village, along the Gore Creek Trail,
with all-day southerly sun exposure and exceptional views of Vail Mountain and the Gore Range, this
new residential development is sure to be a highly sought-after residential address within the Vail
community. To bring this unique opportunity to life, a total of thirty-two (32) residential homes, thirty-
six (36) timeshare units, and eight (8) deed-restricted homes will be constructed on the Property. A
mix of homes, ranging from modestly sized one-bedroom units to larger, more spacious four-
bedroom units, is planned for development. Where possible, attached accommodation units are
proposed to increase the live-bed nature of the new development. The eight, generously sized, on-
site deed-restricted homes are sure to please any Vail resident living and working specifically within
the Town of Vail. Uniquely drafted, these eight deed restrictions aim to serve only persons employed
by businesses within the Town of Vail
Vehicle parking is provided entirely on the Property. A total of 117 on-site vehicle parking spaces are
located within the fully enclosed parking garage. There a no exterior surface parking spaces
proposed. This approach to vehicle parking continues the highly desirable development pattern of
168
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 2
fully enclosing and screening all vehicle parking from public view. As required of the Tyrolean
Condominiums, the Vail Mountain View Residences, and the Altus Vail Residences, the Lunar Vail
Residences and Apollo Park will have no surface parking on-site. This approach to parking is unique
to this east Vail Village neighborhood. Multiple elevators and interior staircases provide access
throughout the parking garage and to the residential dwelling units above. A separate front door
building entrance is designed at the northwest corner of the parking garage on Level P0 to ensure
easy access into the residential building and to the pedestrian sidewalk located adjacent to the
Property and along the South Frontage Road.
The new development of the Lunar Vail Residences and the redevelopment of Apollo Park are
contained within two separate buildings on the Property. One building, appropriately referred to as
the “Riverfront” building, is located on the southern half of the Property overlooking Gore Creek and
the Gore Creek Trail. The Riverfront building includes twelve (12) residential dwelling units and thirty-
six (36) timeshare units. The Riverfront building is divided into two separate sub-buildings, joined by
an interior party wall, with one sub -building on the east and a second to the west of the party wall.
Once constructed and as structurally designed, each sub-building can remain freestanding on its
own if ever necessary. The redeveloped timeshare units of Apollo Park are situated in the western
half of the Riverfront building, and the residential dwelling units of the Lunar Vail South Residences
are in the eastern half. A second building is situated atop the enclosed parking garage podium on the
northern half of the Property. This “North” building includes the remaining twenty (20) residential
dwelling units, eight (8) deed-restricted dwelling units for community housing, and the enclosed
parking garage structure. An outdoor swimming pool, landscaping, an outdoor plaza with barbecue
grills and tables, casual seating areas, and fire pits are conveniently located between the Riverfront
building and the North building on the Plaza Level of the site for owner enjoyment.
169
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 3
All vehicles enter and exit the Property from the South Frontage Road. No vehicles enter Vail Village,
as discouraged by the Vail Village Master Plan. Once on site, vehicles access the fully enclosed
parking garage through one of two designated entrances. One entrance is located immediately
adjacent to the South Frontage Road on the north end of the garage at Level P0, and a second
entrance is provided on the south end of the garage at Level P1. The south end entrance is accessed
via a two -way, snow-melted drive aisle situated along the easterly edge of the Property. The north
garage entrance provides access to parking on Level P0 only, while the south garage entrance
provides access to the lower three levels of the parking structure (Levels P1–P3). The sole users of
Level P0 are the residents of the deed-restricted homes on that level. This approach to parking garage
entry and circulation ensures the most efficient utilization of the parking garage. The two -way drive
aisle also serves as the required emergency vehicle access to the on-site emergency vehicle staging
area located on the Plaza Level in the center portion of the Property. Emergency vehicle access to
the center portion of the Property is a life/safety requirement of the adopted codes of the Town of Vail
and must be maintained. The emergency access has been designed to meet the stringent
requirements of the Vail Fire Department.
This pattern of development is consistent with the existing character of the neighborhood and the
most likely configuration of a future Wren Condominium redevelopment. This is not by coincidence.
The shape and size of the platted lots, along with their location between the South Frontage Road
and the Gore Creek stream tract, as well as their south-facing orientation, dictate the established
development pattern. These same factors contributed to the development pattern of the Vail
Mountain View Residences and Altus Vail Residences. Additionally, each of the properties in the
neighborhood (i.e, Vail Mountain View Residences, Altus Vail Residences, and the Wren
170
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
Condominiums) has nearly identical topographic slopes and existing grade elevations. It is for those
reasons that the building footprints of the new Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park match those
of the previously approved Vail Mountain View Residences and Altus Vail Residences. In both cases,
each has a “riverfront” building as well as a “north” building, and each features a structure that sits
atop a partially exposed parking garage. In each instance, the enclosed garage serves as a shared
parking facility, and each site is required to provide emergency vehicle access to the southern
portions of the site. Furthermore, each of the developments seeks to take full advantage of the
southerly views, and both developments place outdoor owner amenities in the space between the
buildings. And, while the new Lunar Vail
Residences and Apollo Park development
proposes minor encroachments (< 1,400 sq.
ft.) on the side setback, two of the
encroachments exist entirely below grade,
and the third has been substantially reduced
in size and designed to mimic the appearance
of the stone site wall extending the length of
the adjoining property. Stone site walls are
permitted in the side setback and are a
common condition throughout the
community.
171
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 1
SECTION 7 – FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Lunar Vail and its design and development team have prepared a final plan set for the new Lunar Vail
Residences and the redevelopment of Apollo Park. Development review applications were
submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for final review on July 28, 2025.
The plans have been subsequently revised on three occasions in response to feedback and
comments from the PEC and neighbors. Final approval of the development is subject to the approval
of a new special development district and development plan, pursuant to Article 12-9A, Special
Development (SDD) District, Vail Town Code; an amended conditional use permit, pursuant to
Chapter 12-16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code; and an amendment to the Vail Village
Master Plan, located at 442 South Frontage Road West/Tract D, Vail Village Fifth Filing.
A complete set of the final development plans is attached as Exhibit A for reference.
172
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
SECTION 8 - LAND USE SUMMARY & ZONING ANALYSIS – REVISED
According to Section 12-9A-9, Development Standards, Vail Town Code,
“Development standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height,
density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking shall be determined by the
Town Council as part of the approved development plan with consideration of the
recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission .”
This section of the document provides a summary of the land uses proposed on the Property and
analyzes the requested zoning and development standards. In doing so, the proposed
development standards are compared to the development standards prescribed for the High-
Density Multi-Family district, with any deviations noted. Following a recommendation from the
Planning and Environmental Commission, the proposed development standards will be presented
to the Vail Town Council for review and approval. The proposed development standards were
developed with the recommendations of the Vail Village Master Plan in mind.
Address: 442 South Frontage Road East
Legal Descriptions:
- Lunar Vail Residences: Part of Bldg. A & B, Tract D, Vail Village Filing 5
- Apollo Park : Bldg. A & B, Tract D, Vail Village, Filing 5
Parcel #’s :
- Lunar Vail Residences: 2101-08-227-006
- Apollo Park: 2101-08-246-039
Land Use Designation:
• Village Master Plan
o (East Frontage Road Sub-Area #9)
o (Medium/High Density Residential)
o (4, 5 & 6 Story Building Height)
o (Residential/Lodging Inflll)
“This sub-area is unique in that its access is directly off of the Frontage Road, causing little vehicular
impact on other areas of the Village. Large areas of surface parking within the sub -area provide the
opportunity for additional residential infill development. Given proper attention to design
considerations, this sub-area could provide additional density within close proximity to the Village
core. A sidewalk along the Frontage Road should be constructed to improve pedestrian safety and
further connect the Village parking structure to Ford Park. The area between buildings and Gore Creek
must be improved to enhance the natural environment.”
“#9-1 Parking Lot Infill - Residential infill over existing surface parking. Height of
building to be limited so as not to impede view corridors from the frontage road (and
Interstate 70) to the Village and Vail Mountain. Mass of buildings to step back from the
Frontage Road to prevent sun/shade impacts on the road. Satisfying parking demand
173
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
on site will necessitate structured parking. A substantial landscape buffer shall be
provided between any new development and the Frontage Road without jeopardizing
future frontage road improvements. Special emphasis on 1.2, 2.3, 2.6, 3.1, 3.4, 5.4,
6.1.”
Zoning: High Density Multi-Family Residential (HDMF district)
Lot Size: 56,347 sq. ft./1.2925 acres
Buildable Area: 53,203 sq. ft./1.221 acres
GSA Hazards: (per Town of Vail Geologic Hazard Maps)
• Rockfall – None
• Debris Flow – None
• Snow Avalanche – None
Gore Creek Floodplain: N/A
Development Standards (HDMF district):
• Uses:
o Lunar Vail Residences – Multiple-family residential dwelling units
o Apollo Park – Multiple family timeshare units
174
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
Development
Standard
Allowed Proposed Deviation
Lot Size 10,000 sq. ft. min. 56,347 sq. ft. N/A
Buildable Area: 10,000 sq. ft. min. 53,203 sq. ft. N/A
Density
(dwelling units)
25 du’s per acre of
buildable area or
31 du’s total
55 du’s per acre of buildable area
or
68 du’s total
+30 du’s/acre
+37 du’s total
(177%)
GRFA 0.76 of buildable area
or 40,434 sq. ft
LVR South: 30,225 sq. ft.
LVR North: 46,376 sq. ft.
Apollo Park: 29,920 sq. ft.
Total: 106,521 sq. ft.
+66,087 sq.
ft.
(259%)
Site Coverage 55% or 30,991 sq. ft. Above grade: 60% or 34,065 sq. ft.
Below grade: 71% or 40,099 sq. ft.
+ 5% or 3,074
sq. ft.
Height 48 ft LV R South: +/- 63 ft (42 ft.)
LVR North: +/- 69.8 ft (56.1 ft.)
Apollo Park: +/- 63.5ft* (42.7 ft.)
+ 15 ft.
+ 21.8 ft.
+ 15.5 ft.
Setbacks Front: 20 ft
Sides: 20 ft
Rear: 20 ft
20 ft.
20 ft./6 ft.
20 ft.
--
(-) 14 ft.
--
Landscape 30% or 16,890 sq. ft. 28.8% or 16,245 sq. ft. -1.2% or -645
sq. ft.
Parking 117 parking spaces
per Chapter 10, Zoning
Regulations
LVR South &
LVR North: 32 (2 ea.)
Lock-off’s: 6 (1 ea.)
Apollo Park: 36 (1 ea.)
EHU’s 8 (1 ea.)
Guest 3
Total: 117 spaces
+3 parking
spaces
12-6H-5 LOT AREA AND SITE DIMENSIONS.
The minimum lot or site area shall be 10,000 square feet of buildable area, and each site shall have a minimum
frontage of 30 feet. Each site shall be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area, 80 feet on each side,
within its boundaries. The site area is 56,347 square feet, or approximately 1.2925 acres, in size, with a
minimum frontage of more than 30 feet, and can enclose an area greater than 80 feet on each side within its
boundaries.
175
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
12-6H-6 SETBACKS.
The minimum front setback shall be 20 feet, the minimum side setback shall be 20 feet , and the
minimum rear setback shall be 20 feet. The proposed minimum setbacks for the front, rear, and
east sides are 20 feet. The minimum setback on the west side is 6 feet. A total of 1,436 sq. ft. of
building area is on the west side setback, mainly below grade.
12-6H-7 HEIGHT.
For a fiat roof or mansard roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed 45 feet. For a sloping roof, the
height of buildings shall not exceed 48 feet. The maximum proposed building height is 69.8 feet at
a single point on the southernmost tip edge of the Lunar Vail North building. Nearly all other
areas are less than 65 feet in height.
Building Height Plan with Existing and Finished Grades
176
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
12-6H-8 DENSITY CONTROL.
(A) (1) Not more than 76 square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted for each
100 square feet of buildable site area. Total density shall not exceed 25 dwelling units per acre of
buildable site area. The proposed gross residential floor area is 2.42 square feet for each 100
square feet of buildable site area. The proposed total density is 55 dwelling units per
buildable acre.
(2) Each accommodation unit shall be counted as one-half of a dwelling unit for purposes of
calculating allowable units per acre. No accommodation units are proposed.
(B) A dwelling unit in a multiple-family building may include one attached accommodation unit no
larger than one-third of the total floor area of the dwelling. A total of six attached
accommodation units are proposed, and no unit is larger than one-third of the total floor area
of the dwelling unit.
Typical Attached Accommodation Units
177
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
12-6H-9 SITE COVERAGE.
Site coverage shall not exceed 55% of the total site area. The proposed site coverage is 60 % of the
total site area above grade and 71% below grade.
Site Coverage Plan
12-6H-10 LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT.
At least 30% of the total site area shall be landscaped. The minimum width and length of any area
qualifying as landscaping shall be 15 feet, with a minimum area of not less than 300 square feet.
28.8% of the total site area is proposed for landscaping, as per the Vail Town Code. This
excludes the extensive landscape areas proposed on the North building. (Note: 8,076 square
feet, or 14%, of the total lot area is encumbered by the emergency vehicle access. 14% is nearly
½ of the total landscape requirement.)
Landscape Lighting and Snow Storage Plan
178
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
12-6H-11 PARKING AND LOADING.
Off-street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this title. At least 75% of the
required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings and hidden from public view or shall be
completely hidden from public view from adjoining properties within a landscaped berm. No parking shall be in any
required front setback area. 100% of the required parking is located within the main building and totally hidden
from public view. No parking is proposed in the front setback area. A total of 1 17 parking spaces are
proposed.
Partial Parking Garage Plan
179
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 1
SECTION 9 - PUBLIC BENEFITS
As per the Vail Town Code, before the Town Council approves development standards that deviate
from the underlying zone district, it should be determined that such deviation provides benefits to
the town that outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation. This determination is to be made based
on evaluation of the proposed Special Development District’s compliance with the design criteria
outlined in the Vail Town Code. This section of the document outlines the benefits to the Vail
community that outweigh any adverse effects of the proposed deviations. For context of value, the
list quantifies and qualifies these benefits into measured metrics.
Lunar Vail has submitted a development application requesting approval for the creation of Special
Development District No. 44. The underlying zoning for SDD No. 44 is High Density Multiple Family
district. A special development district application is the most appropriate approach to redeveloping
the Property, given the unique characteristics (nonconformities, adjacent uses/approvals, and
existing conditions) of the site and desired development goals and objectives of the Vail community.
Development standards within a special development district, including lot area, site dimensions,
setbacks, height, density control, site coverage, landscaping, and parking, shall be determined by
the Town Council as part of the approved development plan, with consideration of the
recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Deviations to the development standards of the underlying zone district (HDMF) include:
• Setbacks,
• Height,
• Density control,
• Site coverage, and
• Landscaping,
The degree of deviation from the development standards is noted in Section 8 herein.
Lunar Vail is committed to producing substantial benefits to the Vail community that not only
outweigh any adverse effects of deviation from the develop ment standards listed above, but also
ensure that the new development advances the overall development goals and objectives of the
Town of Vail. The public benefits include:
• A fee-in-lieu payment to the Town of Vail Housing Fund in an amount to be negotiated with
the Vail Town Council, which exceeds the obligation resulting from inclusionary zoning
requirements, per the Employee Housing Mitigation Plan. Per the Vail Town Code, a
minimum of 10% of the net new GRFA, or 7,862 square feet of deed-restricted community
housing, is required. As proposed, 1,374 square feet of deed-restricted community housing
will be provided through a fee-in-lieu payment, and an additional 6,488 square feet will be
accommodated on-site. (see attached Employee Housing Mitigation Plan)
• Eight, on-site, deed-restricted community housing units restricted explicitly to persons
living and working within the Town of Vail are proposed. The eight homes total 6,488 square
feet in size and are ideally suited for individuals, couples, or small families. Two of the
homes are expected to be occupied by employees of the Apollo Park at Vail Association to
180
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 2
manage the property; the likelihood of deed restriction compliance violations is nearly non-
existent. (see attached Employee Housing Mitigation Plan)
• A fee-in-lieu payment to the Town of Vail Gore Creek Stream Tract Fund of $125,000 to allow
the Town to complete much-needed riparian corridor restoration, enhancements, and
improvements in the vicinity of Vail Village.
• The implementation of a short-term rental program intended to increase the annual
occupancy of the new residential dwelling units, thereby having the potential to grow and
sustain annual Town of Vail sales and lodging tax collections.
• A Traffic Impact Fee of $215,616 (32 net new units X $6,738/unit) is required per Resolution
No. 27, Series of 2025. As a benefit to the public and as a mitigation measure to improve
pedestrian safety at the intersection of Vail Valley Drive and the South Frontage Road, the
Developer will contribute an additional $21,516 (10%) to be earmarked for future
intersection improvements.
• The granting of an easement for emergency vehicle ingress, egress, and staging to The Wren
Condominiums, currently without suitable access. As a beneficiary of this easement,
redundant emergency vehicle access on The Wren property is avoided.
• The granting of an easement for pedestrian access to the Wren Condominiums through the
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park property to access the public brick paver sidewalk
on the west side of the property. As a beneficiary of this easement, the residents of the
Wren Condominiums will have direct access to Vail Village via the Gore Path.
• Installation of +/- 5,500 square feet of off-site landscape enhancements and improvements
in the Town of Vail right of way along the South Frontage Road as recommended by the Vail
Village Streetscape Master Plan.
• Constructing, operating, and maintaining +/- 2,100 square feet of snow melt heating system
to that portion of the pedestrian sidewalk immediately adjacent to the Property.
• 100% of the required vehicle parking is located within an enclosed parking garage, totally
hidden from public view and completely hidden from adjoining properties.
• The integration and installation of a visual public art component into the design and
architecture of the new buildings, with an estimated value of more than $200,000.
Decorative custom metal panel grates as an example of public art installation
181
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 1
SECTION 10 - DEMONSTRATION OF REVIEW CRITERIA COMPLIANCE
To facilitate the new development of the Lunar Vail Residences and the redevelopment of Apollo
Park, three development review applications are required. This section of the document outlines the
review criteria for compliance and demonstrates how each of the development applications meets
the criteria for review and approval.
The applicant proposes to create Special Development District No. 44, Phase II, Lunar Vail
Residences and Apollo Park, to facilitate development on the Property. Section 12-9A-8, Design
Criteria and Necessary Findings, Vail Town Code, establishes the design criteria and the findings
necessary to approve a new special development district. As stated, it shall be the burden of the
applicant to demonstrate that the submittal material and the proposed development plan comply
with each of the following standards, or prove that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a
practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved .
A written response to the review criteria for each of the three development applications is provided
below.
1. Creation of Special Development District No. 44 (Title 12, Chapter 9, Vail Town Code)
(1) Compatibility. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment,
neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk,
building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation,
182
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 2
Applicant Response:
The proposed development plan is compatible with the neighborhood and adjacent properties
in terms of architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and
orientation. An extensive study of the neighborhood and its evolving character, which began
with Phase I, Vail Mountain View Residences and Altus Vail Residences, Special Development
District No. 42. This evolving trend is expected to continue if, and when, the Wren
Condominiums Association initiates a substantial improvement or total redevelopment.
Architectural Design:
The proposed buildings fully comply with the adopted architectural design guidelines of Vail
Village and the Town of Vail. The exterior building materials are a mix of stone, stucco, and wood
siding. Each of the buildings features sloping roof forms characteristic of Vail Village and the
surrounding neighborhood. Exterior balconies and decks are proposed to add architectural and
visual interest, as well as break up the exterior wall facades. A public art installation will be
incorporated into the exterior façade design to add visual interest and excitement to the overall
design. Unlike other developments in the neighborhood, an intentional act was taken to
incorporate a pedestrian-oriented front entry into the North building. The front door entry and
the stepped back and down design of the North building along the South Frontage Road add a
pedestrian scale to the building. Given the volume of pedestrian traffic along the South Frontage
Road sidewalk, pedestrian scale is a crucial component. The proposed architecture of the two
buildings is complementary and compatible with the Vail Mountain View Residences, Altus Vail
Residences, and the Wren Condominiums, as it mirrors the evolving high-quality architectural
design prevalent throughout the neighborhood.
183
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 3
Scale and Bulk:
The scale and bulk of the buildings are compatible with the site's location relative to Vail Village.
As recommended within the Vail Village Master Plan, larger-scale, taller buildings and
structures are recommended along the northern perimeter of Vail Village. Like the Vail Mountain
View Residences and Altus Vail Residences, the proposed scale and bulk of the building are
driven mainly by the requirement to place vehicle parking below grade within a fully enclosed
parking garage. As noted by the Town staff in 2017, “the bulk, mass, and scale of the Altus Vail
Residences are dictated by the need for a partially buried parking garage.” The Lunar Vail
Residences North building also sits atop a parking garage. Due to the proposed redesign, a
lesser amount of the Lunar Vail Residences garage is exposed above grade than the existing one
at the Altus Vail Residences. The parking garage is necessitated by the Vail Village Master Plan,
which encourages the replacement of the existing asphalt surface parking lot with a below -
grade parking garage. The parking garage has been designed to ensure that no additional
building bulk is created beyond the minimum necessary to accommodate the on-site parking
needs.
Redevelopment cannot occur without replacing the Apollo Park timeshare units. This
requirement should not be overlooked or taken lightly, as it has a significant impact on the site
design, building layout, and the orientation, configuration, and scale and bulk of the buildings
on the site. The net effect is the need for a single story of additional building height on the south
façade of the Apollo Park building. This obligation differs from Vail Mountain View Residences
and Altus Vail Residences, where there was no obligation to replace the timeshare units in
Buildings C & D, Apollo Park. In Lionshead, in recognition of this exact redevelopment challenge,
two and a half additional stories of building height are allowed. Furthermore, in line with the
specific constraints facing redevelopment in Lionshead Village, additional scale and bulk are
necessary to replace the existing Apollo Park timeshare units on the site. The Town is well served
to maintain the timeshare owners at Apollo Park in the Vail community. As a policy, the Town
has recognized the need to incentivize redevelopment through economically feasible increases
in zoning and development standards, thereby achieving its development goals and objectives.
While the Property is not located in Lionshead Village, similar limitations to redevelopment
apply here.
Building Height:
The maximum height of the buildings is 69.8 ft (Lunar Vail North), 63.5 ft (Apollo Park), and 63 ft
(Lunar Vail South), respectively. These maximum heights all occur at single points on the
buildings. From each of the points, the height of the buildings diminishes and follows the
topography of the grade below. A copy of the Building Height Plan is attached for your reference.
This is a deviation from the permitted building height prescribed for the High-Density Multiple
Family District. As a result, the proposed development plan mitigates the added building height
required by placing the South building in a small area of slopes with a gradient greater than 40%.
In doing so, this allows the first two stories of the building to be buried on three sides entirely
below grade, while maintaining the necessary egress requirements and providing south-facing
exposure. This is an instance where steep slopes benefit development. As demonstrated in the
3-D model, these two additional stories of the building façade are screened from view when
walking on the Gore Path by existing and proposed native vegetation , as well as the slope of the
184
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 4
hillside itself. Due to the orientation of the Apollo Park building relative to its neighbors, the
south façade of Apollo Park is not visible to the owners of Vail Mountain View Residences or the
Wren Condominiums. The existing 70 and 80-foot-tall spruce trees within the Gore Creek
stream tract prevent owners on the south side of the Creek from seeing the new buildings.
Context building height diagram
The roof ridge elevation of the Apollo Park building is 8,250”. This matches exactly the roof ridge
elevation of the Vail Mountain View Residences. The value of this is that the two buildings are
now nearly identical in perceived bulk, mass, scale, and height when viewed from the east, west,
and north sides. A more exacting match would be difficult to achieve. In doing so, the two
buildings complement each other well. Neither building dominates nor towers over the other.
As such, there is no negative impact on either building due to the sun or shading. Each is
afforded equal access to sunlight, and each has predominantly south-facing views, hence Vail
Mountain View Residences. This can only be accomplished because the two adjacent sites are
equal in topography and elevation, which is not surprising since the Vail Mountain View
Residences is the former site of the Apollo Park buildings C & D.
185
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 5
The added building height is warranted on the Property to achieve the Town’s development goals
and objectives. Again, like Lionshead Village, where zoning incentives were created out of
necessity to achieve the Town’s redevelopment objectives, the added building height, which
occurs almost entirely below the grade level of the site, accommodates the replacement of the
36 timeshare dwelling units existing on the Property and the replacement of the surface parking
lot within an enclosed parking garage. Further, the building heights of the Lunar Vail Residences
are less than those approved for the Altus Vail Residences. No portion of the Lunar Vail
Residences North building exceeds 70 feet in height. The 69.8 feet of height exists at a single
point on the roof and is due to the north-south orientation of the Property versus the east-west
orientation of the Altus Vail Residences site. The maximum height of the Altus Building extends
along the entirety of the east-west-oriented roof ridge line, as depicted in the image below.
The added height is further warranted by the requirement to accommodate emergency vehicle
access to the southerly reaches of the site. However, the requirement for a 24-foot-wide
emergency access road and a 41-foot-wide turnaround and staging area, which occupies more
than 8,000 square feet of the site area, limits the placement of more buildings at ground level.
In this instance, similar to the requirement for the outdoor plaza and ice -skating rink at Solaris,
the requirement for emergency vehicle access necessitates a building that is taller than
otherwise anticipated.
Buffer Zones (Setbacks):
The development plan complies with the purposes and intent of buffer zones and setbacks,
ensuring adequate separation between uses. As a result of the redevelopment, the existing
buildings are removed from within the setbacks , ensuring compliance with the adopted
186
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 6
setback requirements. This change in setback increases the size of the buffer zones between
the existing and proposed buildings. Notably, the new buildings are positioned further to the
north, fully complying with the rear setback along the Gore Creek riparian corridor. The Wren
Condominium building will still extend to the south, encroaching upon the required setback.
Additionally, a series of off-site wooden retaining walls is proposed for removal from the Gore
Creek Stream Tract and restoration to a more natural condition. The Town of Vail
Environmental Sustainability Department fully supports this re storation.
There are three areas of encroachment into the 20-foot side setback. Two of those areas are
along the west side property line, and one is along the east property line. Two of the areas of
encroachment are located entirely below grade and totally hidden from view. Without reviewing
the approved plans, a person would not even be aware that the encroachments exist. The third
area is now minimally exposed above grade due to the redesign of the parking garage ramp. This
area accommodates a vehicle ramp within the enclosed parking garage. A raised planting bed
has been designed to mimic an existing stone site wall on the Altus Vail Residences property.
One of the encroachments accommodates much-needed storage space for Apollo Park, and
the remaining encroachment accommodates a below-grade stair required for emergency
egress out of the Lunar Vail Residences South building. All other portions of the buildings fully
comply with the setback requirements.
187
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 7
Brick paver path and stone site wall on adjacent property
All buffer zones and setback areas will be planted with landscape to the extent permitted by
the Vail Town Code, Wildland Fire Regulations, and utility provider limitations.
Character and Orientation:
The character and orientation of the proposed development plan are a function of the size and
configuration of the Property. Unlike Lot 1, the View Mountain View Residences and Altus Vail
Residences property, which is squarer in its configuration, the proposed development site is
more triangular or rectangular. A site’s configuration dictates the pattern of development.
188
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 8
As a result, future development on the Property yields a more north/south orientation of the
building rather than an east/west orientation. Of similar consideration, the frontage of the
building envelope along the South Frontage Road is approximately 85 feet, while the depth of
the building envelope is up to 285 feet. This condition necessitates the Lunar Vail Residences
North building to extend further south on the Property. Regardless, the overall north/south
dimension of the Lunar Vail Residences North building is shorter in length than the east/west
orientation of the Altus Vail Residences. While unfortunate, the site configuration and
orientation must be taken into consideration when reviewing an application for development.
A sun/shade analysis was produced to demonstrate the impact of a north/south-oriented
building on the Property. This analysis suggests that the proposed building orientation has
minimal impact on adjacent uses and structures. In fact, during the year, the Vail Mountain View
Residences have a greater shading effect on their outdoor pool deck area than does the
proposed Lunar Vail Residences North building. The Apollo Park building at 63.5 feet has no
negative impact on the outdoor pool deck. Regardless, in the spirit of being thoughtful towards
the neighbors, the design and development team continues to explore design alternatives to
lessen further the impact of shading on the neighboring pool deck area.
Sun/Shade Analysis – Winter Solstice
189
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 9
(2) Relationship. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and
workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity,
Applicant Response:
A compatible, efficient, and workable relationship is proposed amongst surrounding uses and
activities. The proposed development includes a total of 68 dwelling units and eight deed-
restricted housing units. Thirty-six of the dwelling units are a replacement of 40 existing
timeshare units within Apollo Park. Thirty-two of the dwelling units are net new dwelling units
added to the Property. Consistent with the recommendations of the Vail Village Master Plan,
and in keeping with the surrounding uses on the adjacent properties, no commercial uses are
proposed. The proposed development plan complies with the purposes of the High-Density
Multiple Family (HDMF) District.
The Property is adjacent to I-70 and the South Frontage Road to the north, the Gore Creek stream
tract to the south, and high-density multiple-family development to the east and west. This high-
density residential development is a mix of uses matching those proposed for the Lunar Vail
Residences and Apollo Park (free-market dwelling units, attached accommodation units,
community housing units, and timeshare units). The Vail Village Master Plan recommended this
Property and the surrounding properties for additional infill residential development. This was
done with the understanding that the existing development within the neighborhood already
exceeded the allowable development standards. Again, just as with redevelopment in
Lionshead Village, the Town acknowledged that additional development incentives were
needed to achieve the goals and objectives of the Master Plan.
Vicinity Map, 2025
190
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 10
Revised Parking Level PO
In response to the Commission's and neighbors' requests, a total of eight new deed -restricted
community housing units are proposed for the site. These new homes, intended exclusively for
Vail residents, will complement those already existing at the Altus Vail Residences, as well as
those that may be required when and if the Wren Condominium decides to redevelop.
(3) Parking and loading. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in
Chapter 10 of this title,
Applicant Response:
The parking and loading program proposed within the development plan complies with the
requirements of Chapter 10, Title 12, Vail Town Code. A total of 117vehicle parking spaces are
provided within the fully enclosed parking garage. No surface parking is proposed. As per the
requirements of Chapter 10, a minimum of 114 parking spaces is required. Three surplus parking
spaces are available for guest parking. Four parking spaces will be designated for short-term
drop-off/pick-up at the entrance to the P1 parking garage level.
A functional trash removal and recycling program is provided inside the garage at the north
entrance to Level PO of the parking garage. The trash and recycling area is appropriately sized
to accommodate the needs of the development. The traffic flow and circulation do not require
the trash truck to either back up or turn around on the site. Instead, a highly functional through-
access drive is provided. The frequency of trash and recycling removal is expected to be two to
three times per week. According to local waste haulers, this frequency of removal is not
uncommon.
191
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 11
(4) Comprehensive Plan. Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail
Comprehensive Plan, town policies and urban design plans,
Applicant Response:
The Property is located in the area of Town governed by the Vail Village Master Plan. It is not
subject to the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan. The development plan conforms with the
applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan and Town policies. Conformity with the
applicable elements is summarized below:
Vail Village Master Plan
GOAL #1 ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY, REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING UNIQUE
ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF
COMMUNITY AND IDENTITY.
Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and
commercial facilities.
Policy 1.2.1: Additional development may be allowed as identified by the Action
Plan and as is consistent with the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design
Guide Plan.
Policy 1.2.2: Development and improvement projects shall be coordinated to
minimize the unintended negative consequences associated with construction
activity in a pedestrianized, commercial area. For instance, the noise
abatement, project completion guarantees, temporary parking, traffic control,
etc.
Objective 2.3: Increase the number of residential units available for short-term
overnight accommodations.
Policy 2.3.1: The development of short-term accommodation units is strongly
encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing density levels
are required to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available
for short-term overnight rental.
Objective 2.6: Encourage the development of employee housing units in Vail Village
through the efforts of the private sector.
Policy 2.6.1: Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or
redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by existing zoning.
Policy 2.6.2: Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate restrictions
so as to ensure their availability and affordability to the local workforce.
192
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 12
GOAL #3 TO RECOGNIZE AS A TOP PRIORITY THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE WALKING
EXPERIENCE THROUGHOUT THE VILLAGE
Objective 3.1: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and
other improvements.
Policy 3.1.1: Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting and seating
areas), along adjacent pedestrian ways.
Policy 3.1.2: Public art and other similar landmark features shall be encouraged
at appropriate locations throughout the Town.
Policy 3.1.3: Flowers, trees, water features, and other landscaping shall be
encouraged throughout the Town in locations adjacent to, or visible from, public
areas.
Objective 3.4: Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible
green space areas, including pocket parks and stream access.
Policy 3.4.1: Physical improvements to property adjacent to stream tracts shall
not further restrict public access.
Policy 3.4.2: Private development projects shall be required to incorporate new
sidewalks along streets adjacent to the project as designated in the Vail Village
Master Plan and/or Recreation Trails Master Plan.
Policy 3.4.3: The “privatization” of the town-owned Gore Creek stream tract shall
be strongly discouraged.
Policy 3.4.4: Encroachment of private improvements on the town-owned Gore
Creek stream tract shall be prohibited.
Policy 3.4.5: The Town shall require the removal of existing improvements
constructed without the Town’s consent within the town-owned Gore Creek
stream
Objective 5.4: Improve the streetscape circulation corridors throughout the Village.
Policy 5.4.1: The Town shall work with the Colorado Division of Highways toward
the implementation of a landscaped boulevard and parkway along the South
Frontage Road.
Policy 5.4.2: Medians and right-of -ways shall be landscaped.
193
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 13
GOAL #6 TO ENSURE THE CONTINUED IMPROVEMENT OF THE VITAL OPERATIONAL
ELEMENTS OF THE VILLAGE.
Objective 6.1: Provide service and delivery facilities for existing and new development.
Objective 6.2: Provide for the safe and efficient functions of fire, police and public
utilities within the context of an aesthetically pleasing resort setting.
Policy 6.2.1: Development projects and other improvements in Vail Village shall
be reviewed by respective Town departments to identify both the impacts of the
proposal and potential mitigating measures.
Policy 6.2.2: Minor improvements (landscaping, decorative paving, open dining
decks, etc.), may be permitted on Town of Vail land or right-of-way (with review
and approval by the Town Council and Planning and Environmental Commission
when applicable) if Town operations such as snow removal, street maintenance
and fire department access and operation are able to be maintained at current
levels. Special design (i.e. heated pavement), maintenance fees, or other
considerations may be required to offset impacts on Town services.
”The Vail Village Master Plan is not
intended be regulatory in nature, but
is intended to provide a general
framework to guide decision
making.” VVMP August, 2012
“There is a need to continually
maintain and upgrade the quality of
existing buildings, as well as streets,
walks and utility services. Vail's
economy relies to a large degree on
maintaining its overall status and
attractiveness as a world-class
resort.” VVMP August, 2012
“…a consensus emerged that additional development was acceptable, even desirable, as
long as it did not significantly alter the existing character of the Village.” VVMP, August, 2012
“Upgrading buildings - Vail Village has not escaped the aging process. There is a need to
encourage the continued upgrading and enhancement of existing lodging and commercial
facilities within the Village in order to maintain the unique character that is its main
attraction.” VVMP, August 2012
Subject Site
Village Core
194
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 14
“The building height element formalizes the pattern that has evolved in the Village --low
buildings in the core area with larger buildings on the northern periphery (along South
Frontage Road), with openings framing views of Vail-Mountain” VVMP, August 2012
“It is important to note that the likelihood of project approval will be greatest for those
proposals that can fully comply with the Vail Village Master Plan.” VVMP, August 2012
Vail Housing 2027 Plan
The Vail Housing 2027 Plan adopted a Town goal of acquiring 1,000 incremental new resident
housing deed restrictions by the year 2027. The development plan proposes to aid the Vail
community not only in achieving the goal but also in hopefully exceeding the housing goal. To do
so, the development plan proposes the following:
✓ Record deed restrictions on eight, on-site, Type III, employee housing units. The eight
new on-site units total 6,488 square feet in size and vary in bedroom and bathroom count.
One parking space is provided on site for each unit. More than 50% of the 10% mitigation
requirement is on-site.
✓ Remit a fee-in-lieu payment to the Town of Vail/Vail Local Housing Authority, exceeding
and mitigating the inclusionary zoning requirement. As is the practice of the Town of Vail,
the amount of the fee-in-lieu payment will be determined by the Vail Town Council,
subject to the adoption of an ordinance. That Applicant, however, anticipates that
payment to be more than $3.5M
(5) Natural and/or geologic hazard. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or
geologic hazards that affect the property on which the Special Development District is
proposed,
Applicant Response:
The Property is impacted by up to 3,144 square feet of site area with slopes greater than 40%—
a small portion of the South building encroaches on this area. However, as the site is being
excavated to the north, away from the slope's steepness, no adverse impacts are created. In
fact, unlike excavating into a steep slope, the intent is to excavate back away from the slope and
use the building to retain the excavation fully. This approach is the exact opposite of what is
occurring at the west end of Forest Road and at the new Southface Apartments. In this instance,
no soil nailing or shotcrete is required for the exposed cut. It does appear from an inspection of
the site and the presence of existing retaining walls, both on and off the site, that the steep
slopes were created during the original construction of the Apollo Park development. The
existing conditions appear to be the result of the original site grading, whereby the spoils were
pushed down the slope towards Gore Creek. This condition is evident on the Apollo Park site and
the Wren Condominiums site.
195
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 15
Area of man-made slope >40%
(6) Design features. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions
designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural
features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community,
Applicant Response:
The development plan produces a development that is responsive and sensitive to the natural
features, vegetation, and overall aesthetic quality of the Vail community. There are no remaining
natural features on the Property following the original construction of Apollo Park. When
originally constructed, a variance was granted allowing the structures to encroach into the east,
south, and west setback areas. Those encroachments are removed with the new development.
Of concern is that the prior approval allowed the structures to impact the most natural feature
on the Property, the Gore Creek Stream Tract. The development plan relocates the buildings to
the north, thereby further distancing them from the Stream Tract. Additionally, while the
development plan does not propose any added disturbance to the Stream Tract, as a stated
public benefit, the Applicant has offered to fund up to $125,000 of Gore Creek Stream Tract
restoration work to revegetate and enhance those areas resulting from the construction of Apolo
Park.
Architectural Site Section
196
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 16
(7) Traffic. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing
on and off-site traffic circulation,
Applicant Response:
A functional circulation system is designed to address the needs of both pedestrians and
vehicles on and off the Property. To that end, the highlights of the circulation system include:
✓ A site access plan that was designed at the direction of the Town of Vail Engineer.
✓ An emergency vehicle access and staging plan that an experienced life/safety
consultant and the Vail Fire Department informed.
✓ A system of pedestrian sidewalks and pathways which directs pedestrian flow
internally on the site as well as connects to the Gore Creek Trail and the South
Frontage Road sidewalk.
In response to concerns expressed by the neighbors, the applicant is willing to consider funding
a pro-rata share of the Town’s plans for a new roundabout at the intersection of South Frontage
Road and Vail Valley Drive. In addition to improving traffic flow and minimizing congestion, the
new roundabout will feature pedestrian safety enhancements. This would be in addition to the
Traffic Impact Fee requirement of the development.
(8) Landscaping. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to
optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function; and
Applicant Response:
The Applicant has submitted a landscape plan that is both functional and aesthetic. As per the
Vail Town Code, Landscaping is defined as,
“Natural or significant rock outcroppings, native vegetation, planted areas and
plant materials, including trees, shrubs, lawns, flowerbeds and ground
cover, shall be deemed landscaping together with the core development
such as walks, decks, patios, terraces, water features and like features not
occupying more than 20% of the landscaped area ”.
As designed, the landscape plan takes full advantage of all landscape planting opportunities
afforded, including 2,508 square feet of green roof planting and an additional 3,015 square feet
of landscape improvements in the right-of-way, as recommended by the Vail Village Master
Plan. Each of these locations is readily visible from the public way and adjacent properties.
Landscaping and decorative paving surround all sides of the Property , ensuring a pleasant and
inviting pedestrian and outdoor plaza experience. Ornamental shrubs and bushes, perennials,
and annual flowers are proposed to provide a wide variety of textures and seasonal color to the
site, as well as to fully comply with the Town’s adopted wildland fire protection regulations. As
planned, the landscaping materials do not interfere with the pedestrian walkways, drive aisles,
or snow storage requirements.
197
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 17
Since no vertical landscaping currently exists along the shared property line with the Wren
Condominiums, the applicant has offered to fund the cost of planting landscape on the adjacent
property. Acceptance of this offer is solely in the hands of the owners of the Wren
Condominiums. The absence of vertical landscaping on the adjoining property means that the
Wren owners are relying entirely on their neighbors to provide the desired landscape screen and
buffer. The applicant believes a more favorable outcome can be achieved for all, provided the
adjacent owners agree to participate.
As further noted, due to revisions to the development plan, the deviation from the 30%
landscape area requirement is now 1.2%, or 645 square feet. Most notably, the requirement for
emergency vehicle access consumes more than 8,000 square feet of site area , or roughly 50%
of the entire landscape area obligation. Suffice it to say, if the applicant were not required to
provide a fully drive aisle and hammerhead turnaround for a 100-foot ladder truck, entirely
located on the site, a far larger landscape area could be created. The area of the hammerhead
alone is greater than 645 square feet. This obligation was not required for the neighborhood at
Vail Mountain View Residences or Altus Vail Residences; however, it's likely to be needed on the
Wren Condominium property if a substantial remodel or redevelopment is proposed. The
applicant has offered to partner with the Wren Condominiums on providing a shared emergency
access easement. That offer, however, was rejected.
198
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 18
((9) Workable plan. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable,
functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the Special
Development District.
Applicant Response:
The Applicant intends to submit a minor subdivision of the site pending the approval of the
three development review applications initially submitted. The purpose of the subdivision will
be to establish a new condominium map, creating ownership interests in the new
improvements on the Property. This approach is common within the Town of Vail
2. Amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan (Section VIII Vail Village Master Plan)
This section outlines the review criteria for considering an amendment to the Vail Village Master
Plan. As discussed herein, the Applicant has submitted a development application to amend the
Conceptual Building Height Plan within the Vail Village Master Plan. More speciflcally, the
amendment proposes to increase the conceptual building height recommendations for the
southerly portion of the Property from four stories to flve or six stories. Contained within are the
Applicant’s responses and demonstration of how the Amendment complies with the review
criteria. Of importance, to be recommended for approval, the Town of Vail Planning &
Environmental Commission is to flnd that the Applicant has demonstrated compliance with at
least one of the following review criteria:
199
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 19
• How conditions have changed since the Plan was adopted,
Applicant’s Response:
Signiflcant changes have occurred since the adoption of the Vail Village Master Plan in 1990. The
Town of Vail, and Vail Village more speciflcally, experienced a substantial rejuvenation as a result of
Vail’s New Dawn in the late 1990s and the early 2000s. Vail’s New Dawn brought more than $2.5
billion of private sector reinvestment into the Vail community. A large percentage of this investment
was realized within areas governed by the Vail Village Master Plan, including the Vail Mountain View
Residences, Vail’s Front (aka Vail Chalets), Altus Vail Residences, Solaris Vail, Vail Plaza Hotel (aka
Sebastian Hotel) and the Four Seasons Vail. As noted in Section 5 herein, a total of eight properties
around the periphery of Vail Village are developed or recommended for development of up to six
stories. All were redeveloped with the fiexibility and consideration of special development districts.
Unlike Lionshead Village, where impactful economic zoning incentives were created to incentivize
redevelopment, special development districts and deviations from underlying development
standards were relied upon to achieve the Town’s adopted development goals and objectives.
Similarly, an updated master plan was relied upon to facilitate the redevelopment and reinvestment.
Today, that same planning document is nearly 25 years old, and amendments are necessary on a
case-by-case basis to remain relevant.
200
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 20
Additionally, since the adoption of the Plan, the Vail Mountain View Residences and Altus Vail
Residences were developed, as per Ordinance No. 9, Series of 2017. In doing so, the Altus Vail
Residences were developed with up to six stories of building height (70 feet) within an area
recommended for four stories. This change in condition, given that development on either side of
the Property is either already underway or recommended for a six-story development, warrants an
amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan.
• How the Plan is in error, and/or
Applicant’s Response:
The Vail Village Master Plan is not necessarily in error; however, an amendment adds credibility to
the Plan in general, as it recognizes the ever-changing conditions that affect the success of the 35-
year-old document. It also further recognizes the “as-built” condition of the Vail Mountain View
Residences and Altus Vail Residences. The new “as-built” condition of the Vail Mountain View
Residences and Altus Vail Residences has established a new standard for the neighborhood, setting
the scale, bulk, mass, character, architectural design, and overall development pattern. According
to the review criteria, future development must be compatible and sensitive to the existing built
environment.
• How the addition, deletion, or change to the Plan is in concert with the Plan in general.
Applicant’s Response:
It is the goal of this Plan to maintain the
concentration of low-scale buildings in
the core area while positioning larger
buildings along the northern perimeter
(along the Frontage Road), as depicted
in the Building Height Proflle Plan. This
pattern has already been established,
and expanded upon, and in some
cases, these larger structures along
the Frontage Road serve to frame views
over Vail Village to Vail Mountain. The
Building Height Plan also strives, in
Subject
Site
201
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 21
some areas, to preserve major views from public rights-of-way.
The building heights expressed on this Illustrative Plan are intended to provide general guidelines.
Additional study should be made during speciflc project review relative to a building's height impact
and the streetscape and relationship to surrounding structures.
The Applicant is proposing to amend the Vail Village Master Plan Conceptual Building Height Plan to
increase the recommended conceptual building height from 4 stories to 5 – 6 stories for the southerly
portion of the Property. This amendment is in concert with the Plan in general and justifled for the
following reasons:
✓ The recommended height is compatible with the recommendations of the Plan and existing
conditions of the surrounding structures, such as the Altus Vail Residences and The Wren
Condominiums. While recommended for only four stories of building height, the Town found
that the Altus Vail Residences complied with the development goals of the Plan.
✓ Even though no public view corridors exist, the north/south orientation of the Property
naturally maintains views to Vail Mountain between the Lunar Vail Residences North Building
and Altus Vail Residences and a future Wren Condominium, where the same 5 to 6 stories of
structures is currently recommended. When practical, the Town encourages a north/south
orientation of buildings to maintain a peek of a view for many, rather than a view of a peak for
only a few. This amendment carries out that design direction.
✓ As designed, the new Lunar Vail Residences North building steps back at the upper fioors to
maintain a pedestrian scale along the South Frontage Road sidewalk and allows a greater
amount of sunlight to reach the ground.
✓ The Plan recommends that taller buildings, like Altus Vail Residences, Solaris, Vail Village Inn,
The Four Seasons, and the Scorpio Condominiums, which are up to six stories in height, be
located along the northern periphery of Vail Village. The Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo
Park development site is similarly located along the northern periphery of the Vail Village. In
total, eight properties around the periphery of Vail Village are either developed or
recommended for development with a building height of flve to six stories. This amendment
furthers the established design direction.
202
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 22
GOAL #1 ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY, REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING UNIQUE
ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND
IDENTITY.
Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and
commercial facilities.
Policy 1.2.1: Additional development may be allowed as identified by the Action
Plan and as is consistent with the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design
Guide Plan.
Policy 1.2.2: Development and improvement projects shall be coordinated to
minimize the unintended negative consequences associated with construction
activity in a pedestrianized, commercial area. For instance, the noise
abatement, project completion guarantees, temporary parking, traffic control,
etc.
Objective 2.3: Increase the number of residential units available for short term
overnight accommodations.
Policy 2.3.1: The development of short-term accommodation units is strongly
encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing density levels are
203
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 23
required to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available for short
term overnight rental.
Objective 2.6: Encourage the development of employee housing units in Vail Village
through the efforts of the private sector.
Policy 2.6.1: Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or
redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by existing zoning.
Policy 2.6.2: Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate restrictions
so as to insure their availability and affordability to the local work force.
GOAL #3 TO RECOGNIZE AS A TOP PRIOTITY THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE WALKING EXPERIENCE
THROUGHOUT THE VILLAGE
Objective 3.1: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other
improvements.
Policy 3.1.1: Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting and seating areas),
along adjacent pedestrian ways.
Policy 3.1.2: Public art and other similar landmark features shall be encouraged
at appropriate locations throughout the Town.
Policy 3.1.3: Flowers, trees, water features, and other landscaping shall be
encouraged throughout the Town in locations adjacent to, or visible from, public areas.
Objective 3.4: Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible
green space areas, including pocket parks and stream access.
Policy 3.4.1: Physical improvements to property adjacent to stream tracts shall
not further restrict public access.
Policy 3.4.2: Private development projects shall be required to incorporate new
sidewalks along streets adjacent to the project as designated in the Vail Village Master
Plan and/or Recreation Trails Master Plan.
Policy 3.4.3: The “privatization” of the town-owned Gore Creek stream tract shall
be strongly discouraged.
Policy 3.4.4: Encroachment of private improvements on the town-owned Gore
Creek stream tract shall be prohibited.
Policy 3.4.5: The Town shall require the removal of existing improvements
constructed without the Town’s consent within the town-owned Gore Creek stream
Objective 5.4: Improve the streetscape circulation corridors throughout the Village.
204
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 24
Policy 5.4.1: The Town shall work with the Colorado Division of Highways toward
the implementation of a landscaped boulevard and parkway along the South Frontage
Road.
Policy 5.4.2: Medians and right-of -ways shall be landscaped.
GOAL #6 TO ENSURE THE CONTINUED IMPROVEMENT OF THE VITAL OPERATIONAL ELEMENTS OF
THE VILLAGE.
Objective 6.1: Provide service and delivery facilities for existing and new development.
Objective 6.2: Provide for the safe and efficient functions of fire, police and public
utilities within the context of an aesthetically pleasing resort setting.
Policy 6.2.1: Development projects and other improvements in Vail Village shall
be reviewed by respective Town departments to identify both the impacts of the
proposal and potential mitigating measures.
Policy 6.2.2: Minor improvements (landscaping, decorative paving, open dining
decks, etc.), may be permitted on Town of Vail land or right-of-way (with review and
approval by the Town Council and Planning and Environmental Commission when
applicable) if Town operations such as snow removal, street maintenance and fire
department access and operation are able to be maintained at current levels. Special
design (i.e. heated pavement), maintenance fees, or other considerations may be
required to offset impacts on Town services.
”The Vail Village Master Plan is not intended be regulatory in nature, but is intended to provide a
general framework to guide decision making.” VVMP August, 2012
“There is a need to continually maintain
and upgrade the quality of existing
buildings, as well as streets, walks and
utility services. Vail's economy relies to a
large degree on maintaining its overall
status and attractiveness as a world-class
resort.” VVMP August, 2012
“…a consensus emerged that additional
development was acceptable, even
desirable, as long as it did not significantly
alter the existing character of the Village.”
VVMP, August, 2012
“Upgrading buildings - Vail Village has not
escaped the aging process. There is a need to encourage the continued upgrading and enhancement
of existing lodging and commercial facilities within the Village in order to maintain the unique
character that is its main attraction.” VVMP, August 2012
Subject Site
Village Core
205
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 25
“The building height element formalizes the pattern that has evolved in the Village --low buildings in
the core area with larger buildings on the northern periphery (along South Frontage Road), with
openings framing views of Vail-Mountain” VVMP, August 2012
“It is important to note that the likelihood of project approval will be greatest for those proposals that
can fully comply with the Vail Village Master Plan.” VVMP, August 2012
3. Amendment to an Existing Conditional Use Permit (Title 12, Chapter 16, Vail Town Code)
A conditional use permit is intended to provide the fiexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of
the zoning regulations in the Vail Town Code. Because of their unusual or special characteristics,
conditional uses require review and evaluation to ensure they are appropriately located in relation to
the purposes of the Zoning Regulations and their impact on surrounding properties. The review
process prescribed is intended to ensure compatibility and harmonious development between
conditional uses and surrounding properties, as well as the Vail community at large. Uses listed as
conditional uses in the various districts may be permitted subject to such conditions and limitations
as may be prescribed to ensure that the location and operation of a conditional use will be in
accordance with development objectives of the Town and will not be detrimental to other uses or
properties.
The Administrator may approve amendments to an existing conditional use permit (including, but not
limited to, additions to buildings and structures associated with the use, changes to the operation of
the use, changes to the previous conditions of approval, and the like) if the Administrator determines
the amendment meets the following criteria:
(1) The amendment is in accordance with all applicable elements of this code and
the Vail Comprehensive Plan;
Applicant Response:
Pursuant to Section 12-6H-3(R), Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, timeshare units are allowed in
the HDMF district, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit. As shared, the Apollo Park
timeshare units were created and have been continuously operated on the Property since before
1990. The use of the timeshare units has remained in compliance with the Vail Town Code as
documented by the Town of Vail staff. The timeshare units advance the Town’s development goals
and objectives by adding to the variety and diversity of lodging options for Vail’s visiting guests.
(2) The amendment does not alter the basic character or intent of the original
conditional use permit; and
Applicant Response:
As proposed, the redevelopment of the existing timeshare units will be replaced on a same-for-same,
like-for-like basis. Only a slight increase in GRFA is proposed. This increase in GRFA is primarily due
to maintaining compliance with the Town’s adopted building and flre codes for construction. No
changes to timeshare intervals or interval ownership are proposed. The Apollo Park timeshare units
206
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 26
have been in existence since the early 1970s and are a well-established land use in the
neighborhood. Their conditioned presence does not alter the neighborhood's basic character.
(3) The amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare.
Applicant Response:
As noted in #2 above, the use and operation of the existing timeshare units do not fundamentally
change as a result of the proposed redevelopment. To date, the use and operation have not been a
cause for concern regarding public health, safety, and welfare. In fact, the use is complementary to
the 40-plus timeshare units at The Wren Condominiums, immediately adjacent to Apollo Park.
207
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 1
SECTION 11 – RECOMMENDED FINDINGS & CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
This section of the document highlights the necessary findings that the Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission and/or the Vail Town Council shall make when taking final action on each
of the three development review applications. In this instance, the Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the Vail Town Council regarding the
request for the creation of a new special development district and the proposed amendment to the
Vail Village Master Plan. As such, the Planning Commission is tasked with forwarding a
recommendation to the Vail Town Council on two of the three development applications. Regarding
the amended conditional use permit application, the Planning Commission serves as the final
decision-maker. The Applicant recognizes that a final action by the PEC on the conditional use
permit application shall be conditioned upon the approval of both the new special development
district and master plan amendment applications by the Vail Town Council. Recommended findings
for each application are noted below.
1. New Special Development District
As per the Vail Town Code, before recommending and/or granting an approval of an application for a
Special Development District, the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Town Council
shall make the following findings with respect to the proposed SDD:
(1) That the SDD complies with the design standards listed in subsection (A) of this section,
unless the applicant can demonstrate that one or more of the standards is not applicable, or
that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved ,
208
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 2
(2) That the SDD is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the
Vail Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the development objectives of the town,
(3) That the SDD is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the
surrounding areas; and
(4) That the SDD promotes the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the town and
promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that
conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a re sort
and residential community of the highest quality.
Finding:
Based upon the review of development application (PEC25-0026), the criteria prescribed by the Vail
Town Code, and the evidence and testimony during the public hearing, the Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission finds that the Applicant has demonstrated compliance with the nine
design review criteria for the creation of a new special development district, the four findings listed
above, and as noted in Section 10 of this document. More specifically, the Commission finds that
the Applicant has demonstrated that PEC25-0026 is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives
and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the development
objectives of the town, is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the
surrounding areas; and that the SDD promotes the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the
town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that
conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort an d
residential community of the highest quality. Therefore, the Planning and Environmental
Commission recommends approval of PEC25-0026 to the Vail Town Council, subject to the proposed
conditions of approval.
209
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 3
2. Vail Village Master Plan Amendment
To be recommended for approval, the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission is to find
that the Applicants have demonstrated compliance with at least one of the following review criteria:
• How conditions have changed since the Plan was adopted,
• How the Plan is in error, and/or
• How the addition, deletion, or change to the Plan is in concert with the Plan in general.
Finding:
Based upon the review of the development application (PEC25-0025), the criteria prescribed by the
Vail Town Code, and the evidence and testimony during the public hearing, the Town of Vail Planning
and Environmental Commission finds that the Applicant has demonstrated compliance with at least
one of the review criteria listed above as noted in Section 10 of this document. More specifically, the
Commission finds that the Applicant has demonstrated that conditions have changed since the Plan
was adopted, and said change in conditions warrants a recommendation of approval of PEC25-0025,
as presented. Therefore, the Planning and Environmental Commission recommends approval of the
amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan, as presented.
3. Amended Conditional Use Permit
The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting
an amendment to a conditional use permit:
(1) The amendment is in accordance with all applicable elements of this code and
the Vail Comprehensive Plan;
(2) The amendment does not alter the basic character or intent of the original
conditional use permit; and
210
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 4
(3) The amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare.
Finding:
Based upon the review of the development application (PEC25-0024), the criteria prescribed by the
Vail Town Code, and the evidence and testimony during the public hearing, the Town of Vail Planning
and Environmental Commission approves PEC25-0024 and finds that the application complies with
the three review criteria listed above and as noted in Section 10 of this document. More specifically,
the Commission finds that the Applicant has demonstrated that the application is in accordance with
the elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, does not alter the character or intent of the original
conditional use permit, and will not adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare. Therefore,
the Planning and Environmental Commission approves PEC25-0024, as presented, and subject to
the approval of PEC25-0025 and PEC25-0026 by the Vail Town Council.
Conditions of Approval:
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
Environmental Impact Report
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Vail, Colorado
July 2025
PREPARED FOR:
Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC
285 Bridge Street Vail, CO 81657
238
2
PREPARED BY:
Hemlock Environmental Consultfng, LLC
1884 S. Corona St. Denver, CO 80210 | 303.895.1019
239
Table of Contents
1 Introductfon ............................................................................................................................ 1
2 Proposed Project ..................................................................................................................... 1
3 Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................. 2
4 Affected Resources and Impacts ............................................................................................. 3
4.1 Hydrology ........................................................................................................................ 3
4.2 Vegetatfon ....................................................................................................................... 5
4.3 Wildlife ............................................................................................................................ 6
4.4 Soils and Geologic Hazards ............................................................................................. 7
4.5 Noise and Odors .............................................................................................................. 7
4.6 Visual and Scenic Resources ........................................................................................... 8
4.7 Land Use .......................................................................................................................... 9
4.8 Populatfon and Housing .................................................................................................. 9
4.9 Traffic ............................................................................................................................. 10
5 Summary and Mitfgatfon Measures ...................................................................................... 11
6 References ............................................................................................................................. 13
240
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Environmental Impact Report
1
1 Introduction
The Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park Project (the Project) proposes redevelopment of a
parcel in the Town of Vail, Colorado. This Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared
pursuant to Town of Vail Code of Ordinances Chapter 12. The purpose of this EIR is to present an
overview of the biological and physical environment around the Project, identffy any likely
impacts, and propose measures to mitfgate those impacts.
2 Proposed Project
The Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park is intended to be Vail’s newest high-end, multfple
family residentfal development. Within a short walking distance of Vail Village along the Gore
Creek Trail, all day southerly sun exposure, and exceptfonal Vail Mountain and Gore Range views,
this new residentfal development is sure to be another highly desired residentfal address within
the Vail community.
To bring this unique opportunity to life, 37residentfal homes, 36 tfmeshare units, and 2 deed-
restricted homes will be constructed on the Property. A mix of homes, ranging from modestly
sized one-bedroom units, up to larger, more spacious, four-bedroom units are planned for
development. The two, generously sized, on-site deed restricted homes are sure to please any
resident living and working specifically within the Town of Vail. These two deed restrictfons aim
to serve only persons employed by businesses within the Town of Vail
Vehicle parking is provided entfrely on the Project parcel. 125 on-site vehicle parking spaces are
located within the fully enclosed parking garage. This approach to vehicle parking contfnues the
highly desired development pattern within the neighborhood of fully enclosing and screening
vehicle parking from public view. Like the Tyrolean Condominiums, the Vail Mountain View
Residences and the Altus Vail Residences, the Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park will have no
surface parking on-site. This approach to parking is unique to this east Vail Village neighborhood.
Multfple elevators and interior staircases provide access throughout the parking garage and to
the residentfal dwelling units above. A separate front door building entrance is designed at the
northwest corner of the parking garage to ensure easy access into the residentfal building above
and to the pedestrian sidewalk located adjacent to the Property and along S . Frontage Road.
The new development of the Lunar Vail Residences and the redevelopment of Apollo Park are
contained within two primary buildings on the Property. One building, appropriately referred to
as the riverfront building, is located on the southern half of the Project parcel overlooking Gore
Creek and the Gore Creek Trail The riverfront building include12 residentfal dwelling units and 37
241
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Environmental Impact Report
2
tfmeshare units. The riverfront building is further divided into two separate sub-buildings, joined
by an interior party wall, with one sub-building on the east, and a second on the west.
The redeveloped tfmeshare units of Apollo Park are situated in the west half of the riverfront
building and the residentfal dwelling units of the Lunar Vail Residences are in the east half. A
second building is located atop the enclosed parking garage podium on the northern half of the
Property. This north building includes the remaining 19 residentfal dwelling units, 2 deed-
restricted dwelling units, and the enclosed parking garage structure. A swimming pool and hot
tub, landscaping, an outdoor plaza with barbeque grills, and informal seatfng areas and fire pits
are conveniently located between the riverfront building and the north building.
All vehicles enter and exit the Project parcel from the South Frontage Road. Once on site, vehicles
then access the fully-enclosed parking garage at one of two parking garage entrances. One
entrance is located immediately adjacent to S. Frontage Rd. on the north end of the garage and a
second entrance is provided on the south end of the garage. The south end entrance is accessed
via a two-way, snow melted, drive aisle. The north garage entrance provides access to the parking
provided on the top two levels of the parking structure while the south garage entrance provides
access to the lower two levels of the parking structure. This approach to parking garage entry and
circulatfon assures the greatest use and efficiency of the parking garage. The two-way drive aisle
also serves as the required emergency vehicle access to the on -site emergency vehicle staging
area located on the plaza level in near the center portfon of the parcel. Emergency vehicle access
to the center portfon of the Property is a life/safety requirement of the adopted codes of the
Town of Vail and must be maintained.
3 Environmental Setting
The subject parcel physical address is 442 S. Frontage Rd. East in eastern Vail. The parcel extends
between the I-70 frontage and Gore Creek (Figure 1). The EIR study area consists of said parcel
and the immediate surroundings. The parcel is approximately 1.27 acres and is presently
developed as tfmeshare residences and associated parking. The study parcel is relatfvely flat at
about 8,220 feet above mean sea level.
242
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Environmental Impact Report
3
Figure 1: The Project parcel located along S. Frontage Rd., north of Gore Creek.
4 Affected Resources and Impacts
4.1 Hydrology
4.1.1 Existfng Conditfon
Gore Creek is located about 100 ft. south of the study parcel, flowing west (Figure 2). Gore Creek
is a perennial tributary to the Eagle River. No other surface waters or wetlands are present on the
parcel. U.S. Geologic Service (USGS) data from 2003 to 2012 at a well 1,000 feet east of the parcel
indicates groundwater fluctuates between 10 and 15 feet below ground surface (USGS, 2025).
The parcel immediately to the south encompassing the creek, is owned by the Town of Vail. It is
a designated stream tract, regulated by Vail COR § 5-14, to prevent private encroachment and
maintain natural open spaces.
243
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Environmental Impact Report
4
Figure 2: The subject parcel lies about 100 feet north of Gore Creek.
The floodplains adjacent to Gore Creek are classified as a Zone AE Regulatory Floodway (FEMA,
2025). Zone AE floodways are those that have a 1 percent chance of flooding annually and a 26
percent chance of flooding within 30 years. FEMA floodways are shown on Figure 3. The Vail
Stream Corridor Protectfon Ordinance specifies a 25-foot setback from the 2-year flood line of
Gore Creek. The setback is also shown on Figure 3.
4.1.2 Impacts
No surface waters will be impacted by the Project. A constructfon stormwater permit will be
required, as issued by Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment (CHPHE). The
stormwater permit will identffy erosion control measures to reduce sediment leaving the site,
partfcularly towards Gore Creek.
244
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Environmental Impact Report
5
Figure 3: The Project (white) lies outside of the FEMA floodway (blue shading) and the 25-ft setback (pink line).
The Project is adjacent to, but will not directly impact, the designated stream tract managed by
the Town of Vail. The Project will be visible from the stream tract, but will not be a substantfal
change from the current conditfon (see Sectfon 4.6).
Groundwater may be encountered during constructfon, or determined to be present during
geotechnical investfgatfons. If necessary, constructfon dewatering permits may be required, also
from CDPHE.
The Project parcel lies outside the regulated floodway and 2-year flood setbacks. The Project has
no intent to extend south into these regulated areas. Once completed, the Project will discharge
to the Town of Vail municipal separate storm sewer system.
4.2 Vegetation
4.2.1 Existfng Conditfon
The Project area is developed, and little natural vegetatfon is present, if any. Ornamental
landscaping trees and shrubs line the parcel. No extensive natural vegetatfon communitfes are
present within the parcel. The Gore Creek riparian corridor lies to the south.
245
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Environmental Impact Report
6
The parcel has been assessed for noxious weeds by the Town of Vail, and none are reported (Vail,
2025a). Roadside or other noxious weeds may be present, but are not expected to be extensive
based on limited available substrate.
4.2.2 Impacts
Removal of ornamental vegetatfon will occur; however, will be replaced by the Project’s
landscaping plan. This impact is temporary, and insubstantfal. Impacts to natfve vegetatfon
communitfes is expected to be minor, if any.
The Project may spread existfng weeds, or introduce weeds on equipment or imported materials.
Measures may be enacted to reduce the likelihood of spreading weeds. Pre-constructfon
treatment of weeds, washing equipment prior to arrival, and using weed-free landscaping
materials will reduce the spread of weeds.
4.3 Wildlife
4.3.1 Existfng Conditfon
Given the lack of natural habitats, little wildlife use of the Project area is expected ; however,
urbanized wildlife is likely present. Wildlife movement along Gore Creek is likely, but will not be
directly affected by the Project. Ornamental vegetatfon provides limited nestfng substrate for
migratory birds.
The Informatfon for Planning and Consultatfon (IPaC) was queried for federally-listed species
within the Project area. IPaC returned 11 species with potentfal to occur (USFWS, 2025). No
habitats are present for any listed species with the potentfal exceptfon of Monarch butterfly
(Danaus plexippus), a Proposed Threatened species. Milkweed (Ascelpias spp.), the species
preferred host plant, may be present.
4.3.2 Impacts
Transient urbanized wildlife will be temporarily displaced during constructfon. Wildlife habituated
to human actfvity is expected to return. Constructfon noise may temporarily affect wildlife along
Gore Creek, but not substantfally more than the current level of human actfvity.
Landscaping and ornamental vegetatfon provides limited nestfng opportunitfes. Migratory bird
surveys should be performed before any constructfon actfvitfes between mid-February and the
end of August. Conversely, vegetatfon removal outside the nestfng season would avoid impacts
to nestfng birds.
Incidental removal of milkweed, if present, is not expected to substantfally affect the Monarch
butterfly or its listfng status.
246
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Environmental Impact Report
7
4.4 Soils and Geologic Hazards
4.4.1 Existfng Conditfon
The Project parcel is developed; no naturally exposed soils are present. The Natural Resource
Conservatfon Service soil survey identffies the parcel as Urban Land (USDA, 2025). While not
urban by definitfon, this designatfon indicates the natfve soils have been disturbed and
developed.
The Town of Vail GIS contains data on areas of potentfal rock fall, avalanche, and debris flow (Vail,
2025b). The nearest hazards are medium and high rock falls are north of I-70, more than 300 feet
from the Project on the opposite side of the highway.
4.4.2 Impacts
The Project is expected to have negligible impacts on soils. The existfng substrate has been
disturbed and developed. Redevelopment of the parcel is not expected to change this conditfon.
The Project parcel is not within any known geologic hazard areas, nor is the Project expected to
trigger rock fall or debris flow. Preconstructfon geotechnical investfgatfon will determine
subsurface conditfons and any potentfal hazards.
4.5 Noise and Odors
4.5.1 Existfng Conditfon
The Project parcel lies within the developed Town of Vail, and is directly adjacent to S. Frontage
Road and eastbound I-70. Both roadways generate noise and odors from traffic. According to the
Natfonal Transportatfon Noise Map, noise is the loudest at the highway ’s center, registering 60.0
to 69.9 A-weighted decibel (dBA), and decreases to 50.0 to 54.9 dBA at the frontage roads
(USDOT, 2020). The Project parcel current generates typical levels of vehicle noise associated with
resident actfvity and property maintenance. Adjacent propertfes are under similar use, multfunit
housing and parking.
No odor-producing sources are known within or adjacent to the Project.
4.5.2 Impacts
The Project would redevelop the parcel into similar multfunit housing. Long-term changes to
noise, primarily traffic-related, are not expected to be substantfally different than existfng
conditfons. S. Frontage Rd. and I-70 will contfnue to contribute background noise to the Project
parcel and surroundings.
247
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Environmental Impact Report
8
Constructfon will cause a temporary increase in noise and odors, and may impact adjacent
residences. The Project will comply with all Town of Vail ordinances and any permit conditfons
relatfve to reducing noise impacts.
The Project will not construct any permanent sources of odors.
4.6 Visual and Scenic Resources
4.6.1 Existfng Conditfon
The Town of Vail lies in the Gore Creek valley with high-quality views of the Gore and Sawatch
mountain ranges. These mountain ranges, as well as Gore Creek itself, are visible from the Project
and while travelling I-70. The immediate foreground to the north is dominated by S. Frontage Rd.
and I-70.
The Project parcel is presently a multfunit housing development; adjacent propertfes are similarly
used.
View corridors have been established by the Town of Vail to preserve certain vistas. The Project
lies within the viewshed of three such corridors, all to the west looking east (Figure 4).
Figure 4: The Project parcel (red) lies within the viewshed of three designated view corridors.
248
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Environmental Impact Report
9
4.6.2 Impacts
The Project would not impact views of travelers along I-70 or local streets as the proposed
structures would not differ substantfally from what presently exists. The aesthetfcs around Gore
Creek to the south would be maintained.
Project compliance with the objectfves of the designated view corridors will be necessary. The
Project will consult with the Town of Vail to determine the objectfves of the affected view
corridors, and whether the Project is compatfble. Given the nature of the Project, and that it does
not propose substantfal changes to the viewshed, compliance with visual criteria is expected.
4.7 Land Use
4.7.1 Existfng Conditfon
The Project parcel (tax number 210108227006) is zoned High Density Multfple-Family (HDMF).
Apollo Park at Vail, a tfmeshare condominium community, has occupied the property for many
years. The parcel is bordered by the Wren at Vail to the east and the Vail Mountain View
Residences and Altus Vail Residences to the west, both multfunit vacatfon housing.
4.7.2 Impacts
The Project proposes to demolish the existfng structures and construct new multfunit housing
and associated infrastructure. This is generally compatfble with the existfng permitted uses within
the HDMF zone (Vail COR § 12-6H). The Project will ensure compliance with zoning regulatfons,
and obtain the necessary use permits. No zone change is expected. Future land use will be
generally the same as present use. Conflicts with past and future land use is not expected.
4.8 Population and Housing
4.8.1 Existfng Conditfon
According to the State Demography Office, the populatfon of Vail in 2020 was 4,835 (DOLA, 2020).
Eagle County experienced a 6.8 percent populatfon growth from 2010 to 2020 (DOLA, 2020)
Consistently for over a decade, about 7,300 housing units are available within town, with a 31
percent occupancy rate (DOLA, 2025).
4.8.2 Impacts
The Project ’s redevelopment will not appreciably change the populatfon or housing availability.
The Project would construct primarily vacatfon propertfes and secondary residences, similar to
what is present today. A temporary constructfon workforce may require some local short-term
housing and support services. The existfng service industry is expected to adequately support
249
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Environmental Impact Report
10
temporary constructfon needs. Overall populatfon changes as a result of the Project would not
be significant with no antfcipated negatfve impact.
The Project is subject to the inclusionary zoning requirements prescribed within Chapter 12-22 of
the Vail Town Code. As such, a minimum of 10 percent of additfonal gross residentfal floor area
will be provided as deed-restricted community housing. Of the total requirement, a percentage
of the gross residentfal floor area will be accommodated on the Project site with the remainder
provided elsewhere within the Town of Vail. Compliance with this requirement ensures that any
increase in the demand for residentfal housing for local Vail residents as a result of the Project is
fulfilled.
4.9 Traffic
4.9.1 Existfng Conditfon
The Project is located on the south side of the I-70 South Frontage Rd., about 400 feet east of Vail
Valley Drive. The existfng land use is residentfal; reconstructfon will include 73 dwelling units and
associated parking. No public parking is proposed. Though not a change from current uses, the
Project could affect local traffic levels and patterns. To assess this impact, a traffic study was
completed, and is summarized in this EIR (TurnKey, 2025).
The study used recent vehicle count data to calculate traffic volumes on Frontage Rd during
both summer and winter peak periods. It was found summer counts are higher, and were used
for the future projectfons. Current land use creates 12 to 16 vehicles per hour (vph) along South
Frontage Rd. at the Project’s access point.
Frontage Rd. was assessed for grade, speed, and sight distance. Through the Project area, it is
relatfvely straight and flat with a speed limit of 25 MPH. These conditfons exceed CDOT sight
distance requirements for stopping distances, i.e., sight distance is farther than required.
4.9.2 Impacts
Future peak hour traffic was modeled for 2029 (antfcipated opening) and 2049 (accountfng for
growth). The Project is estfmated to create 37 to 40 vph, an increase of 25 to 34 vph over
existfng conditfon. This estfmate assumed full capacity of all units and all trips would be made
with passenger vehicles to represent the largest expected vph count. Realistfcally, occupancy
will not be full, and some trips will be made via other means, e.g., walking, biking.
Because of this increase, analysis was made to determine if an auxiliary turn lane would be
necessary to allow for safe turning into the Project from South Frontage Rd. Based on CDOT
requirements, no auxiliary lane is necessary, even if the turning vph count was doubled from
the expected peak. Sight distance along South Frontage Rd. is adequate to support this volume.
250
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Environmental Impact Report
11
Because of the estfmated increase to peak volumes, a CDOT Access Permit would be required.
This permit determines if additfonal access improvements are necessary based upon traffic
generatfon.
No substantfal changes to pedestrian or bicycle access is antfcipated . Planned sidewalks and
paths will support non-motorized traffic.
Fire trucks or other first responder vehicles can successfully travel through the Project site as
designed without conflict.
5 Summary and Mitigation Measures
Minor environmental impacts would result from the Project, most of which would be temporary.
The existfng developed conditfon of the parcel greatly reduces the potentfal for impacts.
Alternatfve locatfons for the Project would unlikely reduce environmental impacts. Rather,
developing new land or convertfng lands from different uses would be more impactiul than the
proposed locatfon. The expected impacts and measures to avoid, reduce, or mitfgate impacts are
summarized below.
1. The Project will not impact Gore Creek or the adjacent designated stream tract.
Constructfon stormwater will be captured and discharged off-site per the stormwater
permit.
2. No direct impact to groundwater is antfcipated; however, if encountered, constructfon
dewatering permits will be obtained.
3. To reduce the spread of noxious weeds, constructfon equipment will be washed prior to
arrival onsite. Imported mulch, fill, or topsoil will be certffied weed-free. Pre-constructfon
herbicide applicatfon is an optfon, depending the weeds and locatfon.
4. Constructfon will temporarily displace urban wildlife within and adjacent to the parcel.
This wildlife is expected to return following constructfon.
5. Migratory birds may nest in vegetatfon slated to be cleared. If the vegetatfon cannot be
removed outside the nestfng season, it must be surveyed for actfve nests prior to removal.
6. Temporary constructfon noise will impact adjacent propertfes. The Project will comply
with all ordinances related to noise.
7. The Project lies within three designated view corridors. Consultatfon with the Town of Vail
is needed to ensure the Project does not conflict with the viewshed objectfves.
8. Frontage Rd. can safely and adequately handle the expected increase in peak turning
traffic. Nonetheless, a CDOT Access Permit must be obtained due to the rise in vph
resultfng from the Project.
251
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Environmental Impact Report
12
9. Constructfon of the Project will require local accommodatfons for some of the workforce,
and is not expected to exceed availability.
Based upon the review of the available data, there are no findings or conclusions to indicate that
the Project will have significant long-term adverse effects on environmental factors outlined in
Town of Vail COR § 12-12-4. No impacts analyzed will produce impacts that jeopardize public
health, safety, or long-term viability of reviewed environmental resources.
252
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Environmental Impact Report
13
6 References
Colorado Department of Local Affairs (DOLA). 2020. Census data for Town of Vail, CO. Available
at: https://gis.dola.colorado.gov. Accessed May 2025.
DOLA. 2025. Colorado State Demography Office Housing Dashboard. Available at:
https://demography.dola.colorado.gov/assets/html/housingdashboard.html. Accessed April.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 2025. Natfonal Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL)
Viewer. Available at: https://hazards-fema.maps.arcgis.com. Accessed April.
TurnKey Consultfng, LLC. 2025. Apollo Park Multf-family Residentfal. I-70 South Frontage Rd., MP
176.51R Vail, Colorado. July 11.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025. Informatfon for Planning and Consultatfon (IPaC)
Tool. Located at: https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/locatfon/index. May.
U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS). 2025. Groundwater data for well 393823106215900. Available at:
https://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov. Accessed April.
Vail, Town of. 2025a. Noxious Weed Property Assessment Map. Available at:
https://tov.maps.arcgis.com/. Accessed May.
Vail, Town of. 2025b. Property and General Municipal Map – Geologic Hazards. Available at:
https://tov.maps.arcgis.com/. Accessed May.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2025. Web Soil Survey. Available at:
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov. Accessed April.
U.S. Department of Transportatfon (USDOT). 2020. Noise levels around Vail, CO. Available at:
https://maps.dot.gov/BTS/NatfonalTransportatfonNoiseMap. Accessed April.
253
254
Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes Monday, April 28, 2025
1:00 PM
Vail Town Council Chambers
Present: Craig H Lintner Jr
John Rediker
Brad Hagedorn
William A Jensen
Robert N Lipnick
Absent: David N Tucker
1. Virtual Link Register to attend the Planning and Environmental Commission meeting. Once registered,
you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining this webinar. 2. Call to Order
3. Main Agenda
3.1
A request for review of an Exemption Plat, pursuant to Title 13, Chapter 12, Exemption
Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code to plat the property addressed 2903
Kinnikinnick Rd – Unplatted (PEC25-0006)
Planner: Jamie Leaman-Miller Applicant Name: Simon Hamui, represented by Mauriello Planning Group PEC25-0006 Staff Memo.pdf A. Vicinity Map - PEC25-0006 & PEC25-0005.pdf
B. Applicant Narrative.pdf
C. Exemption Plat.pdf
D. Project Plans.pdf
E. 1981 -Vail Intermountain Swim and Tennis Club Condos Phase II Plat.pdf
F. 1987 Annexation Plat.pdf
Chairman opens items 3.1 and 3.2 as they will be heard concurrently.
Planner Leaman-Miller gives a presentation on the application. He shows the vicinity map of the site
in question. The two applications are to allow the platting of the property. The property was never
formally platted. The application meets the definition and process of an exemption plat. The variance
is to plat a lot below the minimum lot area and cannot enclose an 80x80 square.
He goes over the history of the lot and how it came to be. In 2005 the site received PEC approval to allow
an EHU on the property as density was not available, per staff’s analysis at the time. A survey of the
property shows the existing development and setbacks on the property. The development meets all
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of April 28, 2025 1
255
setbacks and standards of the existing zoning, with the exception of the minimum lot area and
80x80 square, necessitating the variance application. The criteria necessary for approval of both applications is reviewed and is noted how the
application meets the criteria. Staff recommends approval of both applications. Hagedorn asks if there was a legal description of the property for the transfers.
Leaman-Miller answers that there is.
Jensen asks if this has always been an EHU
Leaman-Miller confirms.
Hagedorn asks if this is just a plat and no change in use
Correct. Leaman-Miller states that there is only 1.68 units allowed per zoning.
Rediker asks why staff believes that there was an error in 2005 when it was considered part of the
timber creek development. Plat shows it was excepted from those areas. This area was originally
annexed in 1980 with development rights then de-annexed by court order and reannexed in 1987
without that statement of development rights.
Dominic Mauriello of Mauriello Planning Group gives a little history from the owner’s perspective.
They’ve been working on this for a couple years to figure out what has been happening with the
property. Came in previously to try to enlarge the allowable size for a Type 3 EHU, but never followed
though. This has never been platted, but has metes and bounds description. The property can’t be
redeveloped if not platted as it doesn’t meet some code requirements. The applicant has no plans to
redevelop the site, but they might be interested in the EHU exchange program. Notes that 6 units per
buildable acre is what was in the chart per the zoning, but this is a quarter acre so there is only one
unit permitted on this site. This was not an EHU developed as a requirement for the Timber Creek
Lodges or other developments. The EHU was done decades after the other developments.
The client lives on the property and works in town. They are not challenging that this is an employee
housing unit. No new development potential to the site, just wanted to formalize the lot. The
annexations in the 1980s were for a large portion of West Vail, not just intermountain, and there was a
lot of challenge to those when done.
Rediker asks for the plat to be shown. Code asks for the 80x80 square?
Mauriello answers that the 80x80 square is for developability. This lot is longer, and not as wide. This
is not unique with these undersized lots. Rediker asks about line dimensions on the plat.
Mauriello answers 65 feet on the rear and 80 feet on the front.
Hagedorn confirms again that there is a description.
Mauriello answers that yes. Platting was pretty bad in that area of town because of the survey work.
No further questions. Public comment is opened.
Kim Sperry, president of timber creek lodges association. Here to express their opposition to these two
matters as they had no time to review the applications. Would like more time to understand the implication
of the exemption plat and variances. Understand that the property could then be redeveloped under the RC
zoning. They believe that there is a reason that there is a single EHU located there and
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of April 28, 2025 2
256
don’t believe that the annexation and deannexation is relevant and that the original plat for Vail
Swim and Tennis Club does not include this. Does not think they have had sufficient time to review Patricia Rasmussen part of the Timber Creek Lodges association. Voices support of the Timber
Creek letter. Planner Roy reads the letter into the record.
Susie Martin is a board member at Lodges at Timber Creek association to oppose the application as
they have not received notification and do not know how this can negatively impact them. Would
probably support the change if they were limited to what is on the lot today and could not redevelop.
The adjacent owners would be negatively impacted if this changed from the result of this process.
Jim Marx has a couple questions on the data provided earlier. He was there when the EHU was
built. The association owns the lot immediately adjacent to this lot. There was a plat in 2012 done.
Thirdly, they are very concerned about the possibility of 6 units on this lot. Would like more time to
review the application.
Public Comment closed.
Rediker how large is the current EHU? Asks about possibility on size of new unit.
Leaman-Miller brings up the chart of development standards.
Rediker asks some questions of on the developability and the GRFA and Site coverage.
Hagedorn asks to see the old plats. Notes that it was excepted in 1981, and listed as unplatted in the
two plats. Hagedorm asks if staff or the applicant is aware of a 2012 plat.
Mauriello says no, and that the title report did not show any history of a plat for 2012.
Commissioner Comment is opened
Jensen notes that this could give them additional square footage for the property. Would like to see
this have a delay so others could review. Hagedorn is in favor. Nothing underlying is changing as far as zoning and development rights. This is
changing a technicality that is holding the lot back. This is a regular EHU and would have to be
exchanged in order to remove the EHU. Approving this would further bring the lot into conformance
with Town Code.
Lipnick is in favor of correcting this mistake from years ago. Would support the variances to allow it
to happen. Lintner is also in favor of the application to correct the platting for the property. There are no
concerns with the application. Rediker is concerned about the application and the size of what may end up on the lot. The lot may be
redeveloped in the future and the amount of size and development rights that would be granted. The size of
the building on an undersized lot is not compatible adjacent to the creek. Thanks the neighbors for their
public comment. Brought up good issues. There is not six dwelling units allowed on the site but rather 1.6
units. The potential to remove the EHU from the lot and building up to 4400SF in GRFA and taking up
3000SF of coverage on the lot is concerning. The EHU exchange program allowing people to buy into
Timber Ridge is because of the Town’s inability to sell units. People’s concerns about losing an EHU to this
exchange program is a real concern. Proper notice was provided, but may not be enough for
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of April 28, 2025 3
257
others to think they have appropriate notice.
Mauriello makes an additional point that there is an employee housing unit on here because there
was no density. There could be 4 or 5 more units built on this site if they were all EHUs. This is not
permitting something that couldn’t be similarly built today.
Rediker asks about the lot line and how far it is from the 25’ building setback from the 2 year flood-line. Building is completely out of the new setbacks from Gore Creek except for a small portion of the deck.
Jensen asks about the conditions.
Leaman-Miller notes that they are conditional on each other.
Rediker allows additional public comment.
Kim Sperry questions the notification process done and expresses that there has not been
any communication from the applicant.
Brad Hagedorn made a motion to Approve with the findings and condition on page 9 of the staff
memo; Robert N Lipnick seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0). 3.2
A request for the review of a variance from Section 12-6E-5, Lot Area and Site
Dimensions, Vail Town Code in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-17,
Variances, Vail Town Code, to permit for the platting of a lot below the minimum lot size
and not capable of enclosing a square area, 80 feet on each side, within its boundaries
located 2903 Kinnikinnick Rd - Unplatted (PEC25-0005)
Planner: Jamie Leaman-Miller Applicant Name: Simon Hamui, represented by Mauriello Planning Group PEC25-0005 Staff Memo.pdf A. Vicinity Map - PEC25-0006 & PEC25-0005.pdf
B. Applicant Narrative.pdf
C. Exemption Plat.pdf
D. Project Plans.pdf
E. 1981 -Vail Intermountain Swim and Tennis Club Condos Phase II Plat.pdf
F. 1987 Annexation Plat.pdf
Application heard concurrently with item 3.1 above.
Brad Hagedorn made a motion to Approve with the findings and condition on page 9 of the staff
memo; Robert N Lipnick seconded the motion Passed (4 - 1).
Voting For: William A Jensen, Robert N Lipnick, Brad Hagedorn, Craig H Lintner Jr
Voting Against: John Rediker
3.3 A request for review of a variance from Section 12-6J-6 Setbacks and 12-21-17 Gore Creek
Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Title 12 Chapter 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to
allow for additional bulk and mass in the rear setback and 25ft stream setback and to allow
for a relocated trash container in the side and front setback, located at 303 Gore Creek
Drive, Unit 2A/B, Vail Village Filing 1, Block 5, Lot 5, Vail Row Houses. (PEC25-0011)
Planner: Heather Knight Applicant Name: 303 Gore Creek Drive Inc., represented by Mauriello Planning Group
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of April 28, 2025 4
258
PEC25-0011 Staff Memo.pdf Attachment A. PEC25-0011 vicinity map.pdf
Attachment B. PEC25-0011 Applicant Narrative.pdf
Attachment C. PEC25-0011 Plan Set.pdf
Planner Knight gives a presentation on the application. Goes over the requests of the variance
application. Gives a history of the site, how it was platted and zoning history. Pictures are shown of
the existing development and the proposed site plan for the development. The trash container is
currently located on Town property and is proposed to be relocated on the subject property but on
the side property line.
Rendering shows area of the unit that is proposed to be relocated and where there will be additional bulk
and mass in the rear setback. Goes over the setbacks on the site and how the proposed development does
and doesn’t meet them. Goes over the two sections of code that talk about the setbacks in 14-10-4 and 14-
10 -9 and how they are somewhat contradictory. 14-10-9 excepts terraces and walks from setbacks, but
14-10-4 restricts terraces and “the like” to halfway into the setback, or 10’, whichever is less. Staff has
interpreted that to mean that walks are “the like” and must meet that side setback.
Goes over how these walk are not meeting the setbacks as shown and hence the first condition.
The third condition is to make sure the trash is located as far as possible onto the property with
the new development. Rediker asks about the setbacks for the trash, where it is located today, and where proposed.
Knight answers it is currently off property and would be moved on property just over the property line.
Knight continues to the review criteria, the analysis of which is based on the conditions listed in
the application. Rediker asks about how staff views horizontal versus vertical encroachments into setbacks.
Knight adds that there is more harm from horizontal intrusions into the setbacks versus vertical.
Knight continues by going into the conditions proposed. Lipnick asks why the trash should be part of the building.
Knight answers that it is a design standard.
Lipnick questions the addition in the rear.
Knight answers that it is part of the application.
Kyle Webb adds that it was to fix the roof form.
Dominic Mauriello and Kyle Webb are representing the applicant. They have a presentation on the
request. Goes over some of the impacts to Tract A from the buildings on the other side. Proposal is not
a full demo/rebuild. New setbacks for Gore Creek made this building more non-conforming than it
already was. Goes over the setbacks affecting the lot. Application removes a chunk of building mass
and footprint in the setback and add just mass into the rear setback. Continues to go over the site and
building plan. Trash would only be in side setback, not front setback as narrative states. Believes that
the application meets the criteria.
Goes over the conditions of approval. Believes that the walks don’t have to meet setbacks per 14 -
10-9. 14-10-4 is more encroachments from a building, does not specifically mentions walks. Goes
over more on why walks do not have to meet setbacks per 14-10-9. Would like to have condition #1
removed and work with the DRB to move the encroachments back.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of April 28, 2025 5
259
Condition #3 is one that they understand the condition but there are examples of trash enclosures
being separated away from the building. There is no actual stream near the proposed location, as the
stream comes out of a culvert. Would like to see the receptacle be allowed on that side property line
and have the location minimized with the DRB location with a screen or something similar. Doesn’t
think the proposed location is going to have a negative affect because of other items in the area.
Hagedorn asks about where mill creek culvert starts.
Mauriello goes over the culvert area.
Hagedorn asks about a pervious path through the setback and if there is something in code about it.
Roy answers about the allotment for a 4’ wide path.
Peter Wadden adds that is correct and that there is a curve around the start of the culvert.
Rediker asks about the trash enclosure and the definition in staff’s proposal.
Mauriello adds that the container is like a shed for the trash container itself.
Rediker asks if the container is a structure for the trash per definition.
Knight answers that yes, it is a permanent structure on the ground.
Wadden adds that it is a trash and a recycling.
Mauriello adds that they have been operating in this manner for a long time.
Discussion happens around the structure, applicability of setbacks and design guidelines.
Hagedorn asks to see the conditions staff has recommended.
Knight goes over the interpretation that led to the conditions.
Mauriello adds that there is opportunity to revise with DRB application.
Rediker asks for clarity on the paths shown on the plan. Discussion around the paths and where
they lead, and goes to. Webb explains where the path is and that they can look at other areas for the location of the trash
can. It won’t be adjacent to the building because of window wells or egress areas. Rediker summarizes the difference between where staff and the applicant are on the trash location.
Knight confirms that it is the “adjacent” language.
Rediker asks where the difference on the pathways would be located.
Wadden adds comments.
Roy clarifies that the stairs and walkways would have to move to the east.
Discussion around the interpretation and applicability of sections, potential changes and walks is had.
Webb adds that the heated path is located there today and what is proposed would be limiting
the inclusion. More discussion around potential changes.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of April 28, 2025 6
260
Rediker asks if it could even be changed to have a path not go closer to 10’ to the side property line.
Webb talks about why it is located there and how that location came to be.
Rediker clarifies that the applicant would like to remove conditions 1 and 3.
Mauriello confirms.
Rediker agrees not all enclosure need to be attached to buildings. Struggles with the first condition
and how that is not being met. Public comment is opened. No public comment. Public comment is closed.
Commissioner comments.
Hagedorn notes that it is not straight forward. Bulk and mass impact is fine since we’re removing
footprint, bulk and mass from side setback. Trash enclosure separation is ok, but should be
integrated more into the stone veneer or landscaping wall. Would like to see it moved farther from the
stream. Looking at the current plan, the path shifts west, where it could remain and keep enclosure
further from property line. Agrees with interpretation that walkways are not part of 14- 10-4B, and 14-
10-9(c) is more applicable for walks. Net win by tearing out impervious, heated area and gaining
pervious area in there. Crusher fines are pervious to start and then become impervious as they get
packed down. Based on his interpretations, fine with removing condition 1 and struggling with how to
amend condition 3 to allow it to be a bit more flexible.
Jensen ok with expansion and mass. Is fully in support of the conditions that the are in place. Fine with
DRB working with how to interpret those. Commends the Town on focusing on the trash enclosure.
What is happening on tract A isn’t a good example of what we can do. Supports the project overall but
has strong concerns on the landscape plan.
Lipnick thinks the review criteria are met. The rear stream setback has no impact on the additional floor
area. Supports the trash moving from Town property. Assumes the trash will be attached to the main
building. Gore Creek setbacks are a net gain and that the variance has no impact on the public.
Supports the application.
Lintner agrees on bulk, mass, and footprint. Net gain overall. Agrees with Brad’s comments on setbacks. Condition 1 could be removed. On the fence about condition 3.
Rediker agrees with other commissioners on the bulk and mass with no more encroachment in footprint.
No concern with granting a variance there. What is being debated are conditions 1 and 3. Trash doesn’t
need to be attached to the building and it’ll be in the setback no matter where it is located. Would look at
condition 3 and there needs to be one, but that it should be located on applicant’s property, with proper
screening, but should be part of the DRB application. On condition 1, agrees with Commissioner Hagedorn
on what the code says. Doesn’t need language that it go through the DRB language.
Mauriello agrees with comments and is ok with a condition that it be at least a small amount.
Discussion about a potential condition of approval ensues.
Lipnick moves to approve with the conditions located on page 13 and findings on pages 12 -13. Jensen
seconds. Motion Fails (2-3) Voting For: Lipnick, Jensen Voting Against: Hagedorn, Lintner, Rediker
Brad Hagedorn made a motion to Approve with the findings on pages 12- 13 and condition 2 and amended
condition 3 that the applicant shall move the trash location with a minimum of five feet from the side
property line and between the pathway and the home. ; Craig H Lintner Jr seconded the motion
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of April 28, 2025 7
261
Passed (5 - 0).
3.4
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to
Special Development District No. 4 (Cascade Village), pursuant to Section 12-9(A),
Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a mixed
use project on the property known as the Cornerstone site, located at 1276 Westhaven
Drive/ Cornerstone Parcel, Liftside/Cornerstone Subdivision. (PEC25-0003)
The applicant requests this item be tabled to the May 12, 2025 PEC meeting.
Planner: Greg Roy Applicant Name: PHH Design Development
Robert N Lipnick made a motion to Table to the May 12, 2025 PEC meeting; Craig H Lintner
Jr seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0). 3.5
A request for review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-7H-2 Permitted
and Conditional Uses; Basement or Garden Level, and Section 12-7H-3; Permitted and
Conditional Uses; First Floor or Street Level, Vail Town Code, in accordance with Title
12, Chapter 16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow for dwelling units and
attached accommodation units on the basement, garden level or first floor of the
redevelopment of the Evergreen Lodge, located at 250 South Frontage Road West/Lot
2W, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 2, and Lot F-1, Vail Village Filing 2 (PEC25-0008)
The applicant requests this item be tabled to the May 12, 2025 meeting
Planner: Jamie Leaman-Miller Applicant Name: HCT Member LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group
Brad Hagedorn made a motion to Table to the May 12, 2025 PEC meeting; Robert N Lipnick
seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0). 3.6
A request for the review of a variance from Section 12-7H-10, Setbacks and Section 12-
7H-14 Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Title 12 Chapter 17, Variances, Vail
Town Code, related to improvements for the redevelopment of the Evergreen Lodge,
located at 250 South Frontage Road West/Lot 2W, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 2, and
Lot F-1, Vail Village Filing 2 (PEC25-0009)
The applicant requests this item be tabled to the May 12, 2025 meeting
Planner: Jamie Leaman-Miller Applicant Name: HCT Member LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group
Brad Hagedorn made a motion to Table to the May 12, 2025 PEC meeting; Robert N Lipnick
seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0).
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of April 28, 2025 8
262
3.7 A request for review of a Major Exterior Alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7H-7, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for redevelopment of the
Evergreen Lodge, located at 250 South Frontage Road West/Lot 2W, Block 1, Vail
Lionshead Filing 2, and Lot F-1, Vail Village Filing 2 (PEC25-0010)
The applicant requests this item be tabled to the May 12, 2025 meeting
Planner: Jamie Leaman-Miller Applicant Name: HCT Member LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group
Brad Hagedorn made a motion to Table to the May 12, 2025 PEC meeting; Robert N Lipnick
seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0). 4. Worksession
4.1
A work session to present conceptual plans for the proposed redevelopment of the Apollo
Park Lodge and the new Lunar Vail Residences, subject to the approval of a new special
development district and development plan, pursuant to Article 12-9A, Special Development
(SDD) District, Vail Town Code; an amended conditional use permit, pursuant to Chapter 12-
16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code; a minor subdivision, pursuant to Chapter 13-4,
Vail Town Code; and an amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan, located at 442 South
Frontage Road West/Tract D, Vail Village Fifth Filing.
Presenter: Ruther Associates LLC, represented by George Ruther Planner: Greg Roy
Staff Memo - Lunar Park 4-28-25.pdf Lunar Park - Work Session Plans.pdf
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park Narrative.pdf
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park Presentation 042825.pdf
Planner Roy turns over to applicant team for presentation.
George Ruther gives a presentation representing the applicant. Discusses development team, agenda
to be presented. Ruther discusses the project goals and objectives. Touches on what applications will be filed at a
later date. Ruther discusses VVMP goals and objectives. He walks the commission through the design of
the circulation, landscaping, floor plans, etc. SDD’s were discussed, along with deviations from
the underlying zoning.
Hagedorn would like to see deviations from SDD #42 as well as deviations from zoning. Roy has
the info. Hagedorn asks about massing, views from frontage road regarding the parking garage. Rediker asks about the grade changes, plaza level. He talks about the opportunity to match up with
Altus, learn from mistakes of Altus. Questions the height, accommodation units – wants to learn more
about the plan with regards to objectives and policies in master plan. He talks about affordability of
Altus and mistakes made.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of April 28, 2025 9
263
Ruther states that affordable housing units were pulled from project because of Altus issues. He
talks about some people not desiring to live in proximity to other sorts of people. Rediker states that the pricing was too high for most working people to afford. Not priced right.
Affordability was the main driver, not on -site vs off-site. He talks about Timber Ridge and not being
able to sell, developers buying there instead of building. Onsite. Not creating inventory.
Landscaping discussed, especially adjacent to stream tract. Public benefit addressed, but unit
owners would also benefit from improvements along stream tract. View corridors to be discussed.
Lipnick discusses new net housing, enhancing the Village. Increasing occupancy for Vail. Sales
& lodging taxes will help the Town. Lintner agrees with other thoughts. Likes adding more infill, increasing density. Better situation
than what’s there today. Comparison to SDD #42 important. Hagedorn – it’s a big ask, lots of height, density. What’s the trade-off and public benefit? If it’s just
10% community housing, not on board. Parking is self-inflicted with increased density. Looks at ideas
of buffering parking along frontage road. Is there a way to work with grade to help height? What is
housing plan and how will it be mitigated?
Ruther speaks about public benefit – with regards to deviations. Parking drives everything, unfortunately. Density and parking go hand in hand. We will get to these points.
Parking is discussed at length.
Public comment opened.
Jay Levine is with the VMVR HOA. More info is needed, communication with neighbors needed. Too
big, too tall, too dense. Creates a concrete jungle. Would more than double the site’s density. Traffic
flow impacted. Setback to within one foot of property line problematic. View corridor disrupted.
Concerned about huge wall of buildings that would block views, sunlight, etc.
Louise Todd is an Apollo Park homeowner, concurs with Levine.
No further comments.
Hagedorn challenges applicants to reduce parking by one floor.
5. Approval of Minutes
5.1 PEC Results 4-14-25 PEC Results 4-14-25.pdf
Robert N Lipnick made a motion to Approve ; Brad Hagedorn seconded the motion Passed (4 - 0).
6. Information Update
7. Adjournment
Robert N Lipnick made a motion to Adjourn ; Brad Hagedorn seconded the motion Passed (4 - 0).
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of April 28, 2025 10
264
____________________________________
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
P.O. Box 6516, Vail, CO. 81658
(970) 376-2675
george@rutherassociates.com
April 9, 2025
Mr. Matt Gennett, Director, Community Development
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO. 81657
Re: Apollo Park Conditional Use Permit – Verification of Status Request
Dear Mr. Gennett -
Ruther Associates LLC represents Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC (“Lunar Vail”), who
own the property (“Property”) at 442 South Frontage Road West in Vail, CO. Lunar Vail is grantor of
a land lease agreement to grantee Apollo Park Lodge Homeowners Association (“Association”). The
Association maintains a timeshare development (“Development”) containing 40 units and more than
1,700 timeshare estate owners. Lunar Vail intends a redevelopment of the Property with consent of
the Association.
The purpose of this letter is to seek confirmation of the status of the timeshare use of the
Property from the Town of Vail. According to the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail, the
Property is located within the High-Density Multiple Family zone district (“HDMF district”). Pursuant
to Section 12-6H-3 of the Vail Town Code, timeshare units are allowed in the HDMF district, subject
to the issuance of a conditional use permit. According to public records maintained by the Town of
Vail (“Town”) and Eagle County, Colorado (“County”), the Development was built in 1971. In 1971,
the Property was in the HDMF district. Timeshare units have been listed as an allowed conditional
use since the inception of the HDMF district.
The public records maintained by the Town and County are absent a conditional use permit (“CUP”).
Upon request, the Town, as the custodian of the public record, is unable to produce a copy of the
CUP. Since its inception, and to this date, the Development has been actively marketed and sold to
more than 1,700 timeshare estate owners. In fact, as of the date of this letter, timeshare units within
the Development continue to come up for resale. Additionally, within the Town public record is a
letter written by a representative of the Town of Vail Community Development Department for the
purpose of verifying compliance of the use of Property with the Vail Town Code. The Town of Vail
and its representatives have repeatedly acknowledged the presence of timeshare units on the
Property. Given the circumstances, Lunar Vail contends that a CUP exists and has been issued by
the Town pursuant to the provisions of the Vail Town Code in order for the Development to have
been actively marketed, sold and continually maintained by more than 1,700 timeshare estate
owners.
265
____________________________________
Lunar Vail intends to redevelop the Property with a minimum of 37 new timeshare units. In
doing so, Lunar Vail desires to submit a development application to amend an existing CUP,
pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 12-16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code. At a
minimum, Lunar Vail intends to redevelop the Development under the determination that the
timeshare units exist as a non-conforming use, subject to the provisions of Chapter 12-18, Non-
conforming Uses, Structures, and Site Improvements. In either case, the Development may be
lawfully redeveloped. However, in no case is a uniquely new CUP required.
Due to the foregoing reasons, a CUP must exist for the Development and Lunar Vail
respectfully requests the Town of Vail confirms the status of the CUP for the Development.
Sincerely,
George Ruther, Principal
Ruther Associates LLC
266
RON BYRNE & ASSOCIATES
ATTN: SHAWN BYRNE
285 BRIDGE STREET
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
VAIL, CO 81657
Reference
Your Reference Number:
Our Order Number: 50074823
Our Customer Number: 3973.36
Invoice (Process) Date: 06/26/2025
Transaction Invoiced By: Jim Cookson
Email Address: jcookson@ltgc.com
INVOICE
Land Title Guarantee Company
5975 Greenwood Plaza Blvd Suite 125
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
(303) 270-0445
Tax ID: 84-0572036
Invoice Number: VA-16774
Property Address: 442 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
Parties: A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED
- Charges -
"TBD" Commitment $279.00
Amount Credited $0.00
Total Invoice Amount $279.00
Total Amount Due $279.00
Payment due upon receipt
Please reference Invoice No. VA-16774 on payment
Please make check payable and send to:
Land Title Guarantee Company
5975 Greenwood Plaza Blvd Suite 125
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
Form 1128 accounting/invoice.html 50074823
(34090267)
267
Customer Distribution
Prevent fraud - Please call a member of our closing team for wire transfer
instructions or to initiate a wire transfer. Note that our wiring instructions will
never change.
Order Number: VB50074823 Date: 06/26/2025
Property Address: 442 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
For Closing Assistance For Title Assistance
Land Title Eagle County Title
Team
610 WEST LIONSHEAD CIRCLE,
SUITE 200
VAIL, CO 81657
(970) 477-4500 (Work)
eaglecountyrequests@ltgc.com
Seller/Owner
LUNAR VAIL LAND INVESTMENTS LLC
Delivered via: Electronic Mail
Agent for Seller
RON BYRNE & ASSOCIATES
Attention: SHAWN BYRNE
285 BRIDGE STREET
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
VAIL, CO 81657
(970) 476-1987 (Work)
(970) 476-6747 (Work Fax)
shawn@ronbyrne.com
tthomas@ronbyrne.com
Delivered via: Electronic Mail
268
Estimate of Title Fees
Order Number: VB50074823 Date: 06/26/2025
Property Address: 442 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
Seller(s): LUNAR VAIL LAND INVESTMENTS, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY
Buyer(s): A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED
Thank you for putting your trust in Land Title. Below is the estimate of title fees for the
transaction. The final fees will be collected at closing. Visit ltgc.com to learn more about
Land Title.
Estimate of Title Insurance Fees
"TBD" Commitment $279.00
TOTAL $279.00
Note: The documents linked in this commitment should be reviewed carefully. These
documents, such as covenants conditions and restrictions, may affect the title, ownership and
use of the property. You may wish to engage legal assistance in order to fully understand and
be aware of the implications of the documents on your property.
Chain of Title Documents:
Eagle county recorded 07/31/2009 under reception no. 16528
Plat Map(s):
Eagle county recorded 11/12/1966 under reception no. 102538
269
Property Address:
442 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
1. Effective Date:
06/23/2025 at 5:00 P.M.
2. Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured:
"TBD" Commitment
Proposed Insured:
A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED
$0.00
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is:
FEE SIMPLE
4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in:
LUNAR VAIL LAND INVESTMENTS, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
5. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
***************************************************************
NOTE: THE FOLLOWING LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS PRELIMINARY AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON
COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS UNDER SCHEDULE B-1, HEREIN.
***************************************************************
A PORTION OF TRACT D, VAIL VILLAGE FIFTH FILING, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT D;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 325.19 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY
LINE OF SAID TRACT D TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE
HIGHWAY NO. 70;
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 71 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 125.32
FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST 110.45 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 35.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST 35.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 133.46 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
SOUTHWEST LINE OF TRACT D;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT D, SOUTH 47 DEGREES 55
MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST 137.0 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT D, SOUTH 79 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 00
SECONDS EAST 145.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN BUILDINGS A AND B, APOLLO PARK AT VAIL
ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF FILED FOR RECORD AND CONDOMINIUM DECLARATIONS FOR
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule A
Order Number:VB50074823
270
Copyright 2006-2025 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing
as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the
American Land Title Association.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule A
Order Number:VB50074823
271
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part I
(Requirements)
Order Number: VB50074823
All of the following Requirements must be met:
This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this
Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company
may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions.
Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured.
Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company.
Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or
both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records.
1. RECORD DULY EXECUTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED PLAT OF ______.
NOTE: A COPY OF SAID PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY PRIOR TO
RECORDATION. UPON RECEIPT AND REVIEW FURTHER REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS MAY BE
NECESSARY.
2. RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 12, 2018 FROM LUNAR VAIL LAND INVESTMENTS,
LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR
THE USE OF ALPINE BANK, A COLORADO BANKING CORPORATION TO SECURE THE SUM OF
$825,000.00 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 21, 2018, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 201816133.
MODIFICATION OF DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED JUNE 25, 2020 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 202009668.
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED IN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS RECORDED JUNE 25, 2020,
UNDER RECEPTION NO. 202009669.
MODIFICATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST RECORDED FEBRUARY 28,
2022 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 2022003345.
MODIFICATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST RECORDED APRIL 09, 2024
UNDER RECEPTION NO. 2024003741.
3. EVIDENCE SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF
THE TOWN OF VAIL TRANSFER TAX HAVE BEEN SATISFIED.
4. WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY FOR
LUNAR VAIL LAND INVESTMENTS, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED
FEBRUARY 05, 2019 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 201901616 IS CURRENT.
NOTE: SAID INSTRUMENT DISCLOSES RONALD J. BYRNE AS THE MANAGER AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE
INSTRUMENTS CONVEYING, ENCUMBERING OR OTHERWISE AFFECTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY
ON BEHALF OF SAID ENTITY. IF THIS INFORMATION IS NOT ACCURATE, A CURRENT STATEMENT OF
AUTHORITY MUST BE RECORDED.
5. WARRANTY DEED FROM LUNAR VAIL LAND INVESTMENTS, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY TO A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED CONVEYING SUBJECT PROPERTY.
NOTE: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OR EXCEPTIONS MAY BE NECESSARY WHEN THE BUYERS
NAMES ARE ADDED TO THIS COMMITMENT. COVERAGES AND/OR CHARGES REFLECTED HEREIN, IF
ANY, ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON RECEIPT OF THE CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE
AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO.
NOTE: THE COMPANY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MODIFY THE OWNER'S COVERAGE UPON RECEIPT OF
THE BUYER'S INFORMATION.
272
This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any
document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction,
or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender
identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be
ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
2. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records.
3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that
would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public
Records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by
law and not shown by the Public Records.
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the
public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed
insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this
Commitment.
6. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that
levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public
agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown
by the records of such agency or by the Public Records.
7. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the
issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water.
8. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES, IF ANY.
9. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM
SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN
UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 11, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475.
10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED
STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 11, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE
475.
11. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GROUND LEASE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 05, 1978 IN
BOOK 274 AT PAGE 693 AND ASSIGNMENT THERETO RECORDED NOVEMBER 17, 1978 IN BOOK 278 AT
PAGE 682.
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF GROUND LEASE RECORDED JUNE 27, 2006 UNDER RECEPTION
NO. 200616928.
12. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT
OF VAIL VILLAGE FIFTH FILING RECORDED NOVEMBER 12, 1966 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 102538 AND
THE MAP OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1978 IN BOOK 274 AT PAGE 697.
13. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF SERVICE AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1978
IN BOOK 275 AT PAGE 599.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part II
(Exceptions)
Order Number: VB50074823
273
14. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT
OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX,
SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL
ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL
LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY
APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 15, 1965, IN BOOK 187 AT
PAGE 353, AMENDMENT RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1984 IN BOOK 393 AT PAGE 492, AMENDMENT
RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1987 IN BOOK 455 AT PAGE 933, AND AMENDMENT RECORDED AUGUST 2,
1989 IN BOOK 488 AT PAGE 378.
15. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DECLARATION BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR
RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION,
FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR
SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE
EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED
IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 05, 1978 IN BOOK 274 AT PAGE 696.
16. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF CABLE TELEVISION EASEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 08,
1997 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 611627.
17. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND
GRANTED IN EASEMENT DEED RECORDED JUNE 19, 1980 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200646.
18. 40' ACCESS EASEMENT, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, SHOWN ON INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 09,
1981, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 220646.
19. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND
GRANTED IN AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS EASEMENTS AND TERMINATION OF SERVICE AGREEMENT
RECORDED DECEMBER 05, 2008 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200825627.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part II
(Exceptions)
Order Number: VB50074823
274
Land Title Guarantee Company
Disclosure Statements
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that:
Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the
clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least
one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that,
the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or
filing information at the top margin of the document.
Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters
which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for
recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title
Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents
from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued.
Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of
Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following
conditions:
No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or
agreed to pay.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given:
The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.(A)
A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in
which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides
written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real
property).
(B)
The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of
County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor.
(C)
The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a
condominium or townhouse unit.
(A)
No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land
described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months.
(B)
The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and
material-men's liens.
(C)
The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.(D)
If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within
six months prior to the Date of Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include:
disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor;
payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any
additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company.
(E)
275
This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface
estate, in Schedule B-2.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or
information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may
include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance
company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for
the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award
payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of
Regulatory Agencies.
Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing
protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 24-21-514.5, Colorado notaries may remotely notarize real estate deeds and other documents
using real-time audio-video communication technology. You may choose not to use remote notarization for any
document.
That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the
surface estate and that there is substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other
minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and
(A)
That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's
permission.
(B)
276
Joint Notice of Privacy Policy of
Land Title Guarantee Company
Land Title Insurance Corporation and
Old Republic National Title Insurancy Company
This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company as agent for Land Title Insurance
Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company.
We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state
privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence
is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized
access to your non-public personal information ("Personal Information").
In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from:
applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web-based
transaction management system;
your transactions with, or from the services being performed by us, our affiliates, or others;
a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction;
and
The public records maintained by governmental entities that we obtain either directly from those entities, or from
our affiliates and non-affiliates.
Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows:
We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in
order to provide products and services to you.
We may share your Personal Information with affiliated contractors or service providers who provide services in the
course of our business, but only to the extent necessary for these providers to perform their services and to
provide these services to you as may be required by your transaction.
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your
Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion.
Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action.
We regularly assess security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal
Information.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT
IS NOT STATED ABOVE OR PERMITTED BY LAW.
Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We
may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for
example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your
Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is
needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you.
Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy
policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration
277
Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction
thereof.
278
Commitment For Title Insurance
Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
NOTICE
IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE
POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS
COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT.
THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION
OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF
THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF
THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED.
THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE
CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. .
COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY
Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old Republic National Title Insurance
Company, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is
effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the
specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met
within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end.
COMMITMENT CONDITIONS
1. DEFINITIONS
2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Commitment terminates
and the Company’s liability and obligation end.
3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without:
4. COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND
The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or
other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The
Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment.
5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY
i. comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements;
ii. eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or
iii. acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment.
6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT
“Knowledge” or “Known”: Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records.(a)
“Land”: The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term “Land” does not include any
property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues,
alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy.
(b)
“Mortgage”: A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law.(c)
“Policy”: Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company
pursuant to this Commitment.
(d)
“Proposed Insured”: Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment.(e)
“Proposed Policy Amount”: Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this
Commitment.
(f)
“Public Records”: Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters
relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge.
(g)
“Title”: The estate or interest described in Schedule A.(h)
the Notice;(a)
the Commitment to Issue Policy;(b)
the Commitment Conditions;(c)
Schedule A;(d)
Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and(e)
Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and(f)
a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.(g)
The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in the interval between the
Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed
Insured’s good faith reliance to:
(a)
The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the
matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing.
(b)
The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the
Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured.
(c)
The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment
Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount.
(d)
The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any.(e)
In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements
have been met to the satisfaction of the Company.
(f)
In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy.(g)
Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment.(a)
Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment.(b)
Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject
matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral,
express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment.
(c)
279
7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT
The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the
Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services.
8. PRO-FORMA POLICY
The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro-forma
policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure.
9. ARBITRATION
The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of
either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at
http://www.alta.org/arbitration.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Land Title Insurance Corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown
in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory.
Issued by:
Land Title Guarantee Company
3033 East First Avenue Suite 600
Denver, Colorado 80206
303-321-1880
Craig B. Rants, Senior Vice President
This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not
valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II
—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.
Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are
prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the
terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy.
(d)
Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company.(e)
When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only liability will be under the Policy.(f)
280
Lunar Vail Residences/Apollo Park
Adjacent Property Owner Mailing Address List
July 28, 2025
1. The Wren Condominiums
Attn: Todd Mossa, General Manager
500 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, CO 81657
2. Colorado Department of Transportation
222 South 6th St., #317
Grand Junction, CO 81501-2769
3. Town of Vail
Attn: Finance Department
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
4. Altus Vail Residences
Attn: Jim Deters, President, Altus Vail Residences Association
c/o Vail Management
100 West Beaver Creek Blvd, Suite 230
Avon, CO 81620
5. Vail Mountain View Residences on Gore Creek
Attn: Georgia Harper
430 South Frontage Road East
P.O. Box 2623
Vail, CO. 81657
6. Vail Mountain View Residences Homeowners Association
Attn: Jay Levine, President
222 East Chestnut Street, Apt 19A
Chicago, IL. 60611
281
28
2
AUGUST 25, 2025 RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES & APOLLO PARK
442 South Frontage Road East
Vail, Colorado 81657
Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission
Special Development District No. 44
(PEC25-0024 – 0026)
Final Review
283
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: Introduction
Section 2: Design and Development Team
Section 3: Project Description
Section 4: Background
Section 5: Development Applications
Section 6: Development and Building Program
Section 7: Final Development Plans
7.1 Survey
7.2 Vicinity and Context
7.3 Site Plan
7.4 Landscape Plan
7.5 Architectural Floor Plans
7.6 Building Section Diagrams
7.7 Architectural Elevations
7.8 Architectural Renderings
7.9 Exterior Building Materials
Section 8: Land Use and Zoning Analysis
Section 9: Public Benefits
Section 10: Demonstration of Review Criteria Compliance
Section 11: Recommended Findings
284
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 1
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION
The Ownership
Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC (“Lunar Vail”) is the ownership entity of the property located at 442
South Frontage Road East, Vail, CO, 81658, legally described as Part of Bldgs. A & B, Tract D, Vail
Village Filing No. 5. (“Property”). Local Vail residents, Ron and Shawn Byrne (“Owner”) manage the
Property on behalf of Lunar Vail. Lunar Vail maintains the fee simple ownership interest in the land
and serves as the grantor of a leasehold agreement with the grantee, Apollo Park at Vail Association
(“Apollo Park HOA”). Apollo Park HOA owns and manages the vertical improvements (residential
timeshare unit buildings, swimming pool, outdoor seating areas, trash/recycling facilities, etc.) on
the land area which is subject to the leasehold agreement.
The Project
Together, Lunar Vail and Apollo Park HOA desire
to develop the new Lunar Vail Residences and
redevelop the existing Apollo Park Lodge
timeshare units. The project proposes to be a
mix of new residential condominiums, timeshare
units, and community housing. As one of the last
remaining infill development and redevelopment
opportunities in the East Vail Village
neighborhood, the Property holds great promise
for continued reinvestment in the Vail
community. It has been through continual
upgrades and reinvestments in the built
environment that the Vail community has
remained at the top as the “premier international
mountain resort community”.
The Approach
As a single purpose ownership entity, Lunar Vail
will take the lead and manage the new
development and redevelopment processes of
the Property. With more than 1,700 timeshare
estate owners within the Apollo Park HOA, the
Board of Directors have worked most closely
with Lunar Vail and serve to direct the
redevelopment on behalf of the timeshare owners’ interests. This collaborative approach to the
redevelopment of the Property ensures all interested parties are actively participating. Lunar Vail
continues to actively engage with the adjacent property owners in the neighborhood to share
information and ensure that transparency exists within the development review process. To date,
multiple meetings have occurred with the owner’s associations of the Vail Mountain View
285
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 2
Residences, Altus Vail Residences, and The Wren Condominiums. Input from the neighbors can be
seen addressed throughout the proposed project.
The Opportunity
The Lunar Vail Residences/Apollo Park development advances many stated community
development goals and objectives. Of significance, the new development achieves the following
community goals of:
1) continued upgrading and enhancement of Vail Village through infill redevelopment,
2) completing the specific recommendations of the Vail Village Master Plan for the East Vail
Village sub-area,
3) increasing annual sales/lodging tax collections and vitality through an increase of
occupancy of live beds, and
4) helping the Vail community acquire 1,000 net new community housing deed restrictions
by the year 2027.
The new Lunar Vail Residences and redeveloped Apollo Park are ideally located within an east Vail
Village neighborhood. This neighborhood is defined by the Ford Park to the east, Gore Creek and the
Gore Creek stream tract and Gore Creek Trail to the south, the Vail Village Parking Garage to the west
and the Town of Vail South Frontage Road and Colorado Department of Transportation/Federal
Highways Administration Interstate 70 to the north.
East Village Neighborhood, 2025
286
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 3
Within this neighborhood exists the Tyrolean Condominiums, the Vail Mountain View Residences,
the Altus Vail Residences, and the Wren Condominiums. A total of nearly 150 dwelling units currently
exists within the neighborhood amongst a mix of residential dwelling units, attached lock -off units
and timeshare units. With the replacement of the Tyrolean Restaurant (formerly the Blue Cow) with
a new residential dwelling unit, and the office uses in The Wren Condominiums replaced with
residential dwelling units, and as directed by the Vail Land Use Plan and Vail Village Master Plan, no
commercial uses remain within this East Vail Village neighborhood.
The new Lunar Vail Residences and redeveloped Apollo Park promises to be a welcomed addition to
the Vail community and its East Vail Village neighborhood. As such, the design and development
team look forward to collaborating with the Town of Vail, our neighbors, and the Vail community
through the development review and entitlement processes.
287
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT TEAM DIRECTORY
Owners/Applicants
Ron Byrne
Ron Byrne & Associates, Inc
dba as Lunar Vail Land Investment LLC
285 Bridge Street, Vail, CO. 81657
Shawn Byrne
Ron Byrne & Associates, Inc
dba as Lunar Vail Land Investment LLC
285 Bridge Street, Vail, CO. 81657
Owner’s Representative
Jack Hunn, President
Hunn Consulting Group
P.O. Box 1095
Vail CO. 81658
Architecture & Design Team
Robert “Fiz” Fitzgerald, Principal
NAKA^tecture, LLC
NCARB, Registered Architect
171 Newport St.
Denver, CO 80220
Dimitri Smirniotopoulos
DSI Architects
2690 West Dublin-Granville Road
Columbus, Ohio 43235
Scott Lesicko
DSI Architects
2690 West Dublin-Granville Road
Columbus, Ohio 43235
Jason Wing
Ionâs BIMWORKS
1793 Ivanhoe Street
Denver, CO 80220
Development Review & Entitlements
George Ruther, Principal
Ruther Associates LLC
P.O. Box 6516
Vail, CO. 81658
george@rutherassociates.com
General Contractor
Doug Thompson
Hyder Construction
1031 Santa Fe Drive, Ste. 300
Denver, Colorado 80204
Legal Counsel
Christopher Payne
Ballard Spahr LLP
1225 17th Street, Suite 2300
Denver, CO 80202-5596
Traffic Engineering
Skip Hudson
TurnKey Consulting, LLC
2667 Amber Spring Way
Grand Junction, CO 81506
Environmental Review
Matt Kizlinski
Hemlock Environmental Consulting, LLC
1884 South Corona St.
Denver CO 80210
Fire Protection and Code Consulting
Steve Rondinelli
Rondinelli Life/Safety
15272 West Warren Drive
Lakewood, Colorado
288
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
Geo-Technical Soils Investigation
Ian Cesare
CMT Technical Services
7108 South Alton Way, Bldg. B
Centennial, Colorado 80112
Civil Engineering
Mason Talkington, P.E.
Martin/Martin Civil Engineering
77 Metcalf Road, Suite 301
Avon, Colorado 81620
Apollo Park at Vail
Dave Zessin, President
Apollo Park at Vail HOA
442 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO. 81657
Apollo Park Owner’s Representative
Landscape Design Consultant
Kathy Aalto/Clint Granos
Ceres + Landscape Architecture
P.O. Box 2134
Eagle, Colorado 81631
MEP Consultant
Craig Watts
IMEG Construction Engineering
7600 East Orchard Road, Ste. 250-S
Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111
Structural Design
Craig Carroll
IMEG Construction Engineering
7600 East Orchard Road, Ste. 250-S
Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111
Todd Goulding
Goulding Development Advisors, LLC
PO Box 2308
Edwards, CO 81632
Apollo Park at Vail Legal Counsel
Dan Reynolds
210 Edwards Village Blvd. A105
P.O. Box 2340
Edwards, CO 81632
289
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 1
SECTION 3 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Lunar Vail Residences, both North and South, is a new luxury multiple family residential
condominium development located on the periphery of Vail Village. Apollo Park is a redevelopment
project intended to significantly upgrade and replace a nearly 50-year-old timeshare development
existing on the site.
The new development is proposed within the context of the East Vail Village neighborhood between
Blue Cow Chute
and Gerald R.
Ford Park.
Existing
neighbors with
the East Vail
Village
neighborhood
include the
Tyrolean
Condominiums,
the Altus Vail
Residences, the
Vail Mountain
View Residences
and The Wren
Condominiums.
Vicinity Map, 2025
290
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 2
A total of 75 new homes and up to 125 fully enclosed vehicle parking spaces will be built in two
separate buildings on the site. The 75 new homes are a mix of 37 new residential condominiums, 36
redeveloped timeshare units, and 2 new deed-restricted homes for community housing.
On-site Deed-restricted Housing Units
Two, on-site, two -bedroom, two -bathroom deed-restricted homes will be constructed on the
Property.
The new buildings are up to six stories
tall. The architectural style of the new
buildings is complementary to the
existing Vail Mountain View
Residences, Altus Vail Residences,
and The Wren Condominiums with an
assemblage of stone, stucco and
291
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 3
wood-like siding for exterior building materials.
The new development replaces an existing asphalt surface vehicle parking lot recommended for
removal by the Vail Village Master Plan.
Existing Surface Parking Lot
Primary vehicle
access to the site
is from the South
Frontage Road.
Pedestrians will
access the site
using the
sidewalk along
the South
Frontage Road,
or alternately, by
using the Gore
Trail immediately
adjacent to the
south of the site.
Site Circulation Diagram
292
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 4
As an owner’s amenities package, an outdoor plaza with casual seating, gas fire pits, cooking grills
and swimming pools is incorporated into the landscape design.
Plaza Level Amenities
A thoughtful landscape
design, including two
roof top planting areas,
balances visual
aesthetics, fire-wise
protection, visual
screening, and year-
round appeal into the
overall design of the
buildings and site. Low
level, fully cut-off
landscape light fixtures
not only comply with the
Town’s outdoor lighting
standards, but they
minimize undesirable
light pollution.
Landscape Plan
293
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 5
To facilitate this new development, three development review applications have been submitted to
the Town of Vail for review and approval. The three development applications include:
1) Creation of a new special development district,
2) An amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan, and
3) An amendment to an existing conditional use permit.
294
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 1
SECTION 3 - BACKGROUND
A. Subdivision and Plat Mapping
On November 4, 1965, the original plat map of the Vail Village Fifth Filing Subdivision was
approved by the Eagle County Planning Commission establishing Tract D, Vail Village Fifth
Filing. According to Town of Vail
records, Tract D has since been
re-subdivided four times. These
four re-subdivisions facilitated
the development of The Wren
Condominiums, Apollo Park,
Apollo Park Lodge, and the
Tyrolean Condominiums. The
Vail Mountain View Residences
and Altus Vail Residences
would subsequently be built on
a re-subdivided portion of Tract
D, on the former site of the
Apollo Park Lodge, Buildings C
and D.
Vail Village Fifth Filing, 1965
On September 5, 1978, a condominium map of the Apollo Park at Vail Association was
recorded by the Eagle County Recorder ’s Office. Pursuant to Town of Vail Subdivision
regulations, a condominium map shall be recorded following construction of the structures
approved by the Town for development on the parcel. In this instance, the condominium
map for Buildings A and B
was platted and recorded. To
be noted is the approved
location of the structures
relative to the east, west, and
south property lines. The
Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission
granted a prior property
owner a variance to building
within the prescribed setback
areas of the property. Of
further importance, differing
from a subdivision plat map,
Subject Site
TRACT D
295
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 2
a condominium map does not establish property boundary lines for the purposes of land
subdivision.
Subsequently, an amended condominium plat map was recorded establishing the approved
locations of Buildings C and D, Apollo Park Lodge. Buildings C and D were developed
following the completion
of Buildings A and B. For
purposes of zoning, the
locations of Buildings A,
B, C, and D did not
conform with the setback
requirements for
development in the
prescribed zone district.
In 2017, Buildings C and D
were razed to allow for the
development of the Vail
Mountain View
Residences, Phase I.
Apollo Park Buildings A, B, C, & D, Condominium Map, 1979
On August 14, 2006, the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission approved a
minor subdivision creating a Final Plat, Lot 1, A Re-subdivision of a Part of Tract D, Vail Village
Fifth Filing. This new Lot 1 would eventually become the development site of the Vail
Mountain View
Residences, Phase I.
Phase I of the Vail
Mountain View
Residences were
developed as a use by
right within the High-
Density Multiple
Family zone district.
The development was
approved with a
second phase of
development having
been contemplated.
Lot 1, Vail Village Fifth Filing
296
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 3
Site Plan, Phase II, Vail Mountain View Residences, 2017
In 2017, Phase II of the Vail Mountain View Residences (Altus Vail Residences) was approved
on the northern one-half of Lot 1, Vail Village Fifth Filing. Phase II completed the
development planned and approved for Lot 1. Each phase of the Vail Mountain View
Residences was developed as part of Special Development District No. 42. Special
Development District No 42 included deviations from the development standards for GRFA,
density, building height, site coverage and landscape area.
297
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 4
A recently
updated 2025
ALTA survey
showing the “as-
built” conditions
of the Apollo Park
site was
completed. The
survey accurately
identifles the
existing location
of the structures
and
improvements on
the surface of the
site, including
Buildings A and B, site topography, the surface parking lot and swimming pool amenity and
notes the location of recorded easements and below grade utilities such as water, sewer,
electric and natural gas. Of signiflcance is a 30-foot-wide Eagle River Water and Sanitation
District water and sewer easement traversing east/west across the Property. Existing
topography and vegetation and conditions immediately adjacent to the site are provided.
B. Land Use and Zoning
The Vail Land Use Plan was adopted by the Vail Town Council subject to the passage of
Resolution No. 27, Series of 1986. The Vail Land Use Plan has served the Vail community
well in its nearly 40 years of existence. The Land Use Plan has been used as a guiding
document in the development and redevelopment of properties throughout Vail. Having
been approved for amendments six times since its original adoption, the Vail Land Use Plan
remains a relevant planning document to this day. The Vail Land Use Plan is intended to
serve as a basis from which future decisions may be made regarding land use within Vail.
According to the Vail Land Use Plan, the Property maintains a land use designation of Vail
Village Master Plan. That said, future development on the Property should be guided by the
recommendations contained within the framework of the Vail Village Master Plan.
298
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 5
Vail Land Use Plan, Town of Vail
The recommendations prescribed within the Vail Village Master Plan for development on the
Property and the adjacent properties are more fully described herein.
According to the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail,
the Property is located within the High-Density Multiple
Family (“HDMF”) district. The Property has been within
the HDMF district since its original incorporation into
the Town of Vail.
Official Zoning Map, Town of Vail
First established in 1973, the HDMF district is intended to provide sites for multiple-family
dwellings at densities to a maximum of 25 dwelling units per acre, together with such public
and semipublic facilities and lodges, private recreation facilities and related visitor -oriented
uses as may appropriately be located in the same zone district. The HDMF district is
intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space and other amenities commensurate with
high density apartment, condominium and lodge uses, and to maintain the desirable
residential and resort qualities of the zone district by establishing appropriate site
299
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 6
development standards. Certain nonresidential uses are permitted as conditional uses,
which relate to the nature of Vail as a winter and summer recreation and vacation community
and, where permitted, are intended to blend harmoniously with the residential character of
the zone district.
According to Town flles, the HDMF district has been amended three times since its
inception. Some of the Town’s more densely populated residential neighborhoods are
located within special development districts with an underlying zoning designation of HDMF.
No substantial amendments to the HDMF district have occurred since the 1990 adoption of
the Vail Village Master Plan.
The Town of Vail has consistently relied upon special development districts to further the
purposes of the Zoning Regulations of the Town of Vail and achieve the development goals
and objectives outlined in Section 12-1-2(B), Speciflc Purposes, of the Vail Town Code. Today,
as many as 43 Special Development Districts have been approved in the Town of Vail. Most
recently, Special Development District No. 42, Vail Mountain View Residences, Phase I and
Phase II, was approved with densities greater than 25 dwelling units per acre with buildings
up to 70 feet in height. Each further granted deviations from GRFA, site coverage, and
setbacks requirements.
Special Development Districts in the vicinity of the Apollo Park, (Town of Vail flles)
300
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 7
C. Development History
Historically speaking, and as recently as 20 years ago, the East Vail Village Neighborhood
area of Vail Village had been characterized by three and four-story tall, high-density
residential development with substantial amounts of surface vehicle parking lots. Those
surface vehicle parking lots, at both Apollo Park Buildings A, B, C, and D and The Wren
Condominiums,
are non-
conforming and
do not comply
with the parking
requirements of
the HDMF
district.
Continuing this
pattern of
development is
discouraged by
the Vail Village
Master Plan
(adopted 1986),
and instead,
identifled this
neighborhood
as an area
located on the
periphery of the core of Vail Village with substantial inflll redevelopment opportunities. The
only commercial development that existed in this neighborhood was the Tyrolean
Restaurant (formerly, the Blue Cow). The Tyrolean Restaurant was redeveloped in 2007 and
converted into the largest residential dwelling unit in the area. The Wren Condominiums and
the Tyrolean Condominiums are also non-conforming with respect to density (du’s/acre),
GRFA , setbacks, and site coverage. The only conforming structures in this East Vail Village
neighborhood are the Vail Mountain View Residences and the Altus Vail Residences.
Conformity was achieved through the fiexibility afforded by a special development district.
301
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 8
The Apollo Park Lodge has undergone little to no substantial redevelopment since its original
construction in the early 1970’s. A review of the Town of Vail flles indicates that the most
signiflcant improvement to Buildings A and B is the replacement of electrical wiring and the
replacement of the roofs. Even though both Buildings are wood framed construction, and
each has been notifled of the need for a flre sprinkler system, neither has undergone the
necessary flre prevention work. A new swimming pool was added to the Property in 2007 to
replace an existing swimming pool that was demolished to allow for the development of the
Vail Mountain View Residences. Unfortunately, despite $2.5 billion dollars of private sector
investments made within the Vail community during the six year period from 2003 to 2008,
none of that investment went into the Apollo Park buildings.
Timeline of Apollo Park Redevelopment
The timeline above visually represents the changes to the conflguration of Part of Tract D,
Vail Village, Fifth Filing from 1970 to 2019. As of today, Buildings C and D, Apollo Park, have
been entirely replaced by the Vail Mountain View Residences and Altus Vail Residences
multiple family residential developments. Note the replacement of the vast expanse of pre-
existing asphalt surface parking lot with new residential buildings and fully enclosed parking
garages. But for Apollo Park Buildings A and B, and The Wren Condominiums, surface
parking within this East Vail Village neighborhood is non-existent. It is likely that those too
will be replaced with future redevelopment. However, given the number of timeshare
ownership interests within each of the properties, creative solutions to redevelopment will
be necessary to achieve the Town’s development goals and objectives and to implement the
recommendations within the Vail Village Master Plan.
302
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 9
2004 Aerial Image, Town of Vail
In 2017, the Vail Town Council approved Special Development District No. 42. SDD No. 42
approved the redevelopment of the western half of Apollo Park, Buildings C and D. As part
of the redevelopment, Buildings C and D were demolished and replaced with the Vail
Mountain View Residences, Phase I. This flrst phase of redevelopment included the
development of 23 residential dwelling units and a partially buried fully, enclosed parking
garage with a total of 111 parking spaces. The parking spaces provided in excess of the
requirement for the Phase I development were temporarily leased to the public for a period
of time until Phase II (Altus Vail Residences) was entitled and constructed.
303
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 10
2018 Aerial Imagery, Town of Vail
Rendering of the Proposed Vail Mountain View Residences, Phase II, 2017
304
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 11
D. Existing Conditions
Today, more than 150 dwelling units, timeshare units and lock-off accommodation units
exist within the East Vail Village neighborhood. This includes 9 dwelling units within the
Tyrolean Condominiums, 23 dwellings within the Vail Mountain View Residences, 30
dwelling units and 20 attached lock-off accommodation units in the Altus Vail Residences
(formerly Vail Mountain View Residences, Phase II), 51 dwelling units within The Wren
Condominiums, and 40 timeshare units within Apollo Park. Of these properties, arguably,
Apollo Park is the most outdated and showing its age. After nearly flfty years, Apollo Park is
ready to be redeveloped.
Apollo Park, 2025 North Elevation Apollo Park, 2025 Surface Parking Lot
Apollo Park, 2025, South Elevation Apollo Park, 2025, East Property Line
305
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 12
E. Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission Worksession
The Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park design and development presented conceptual plans to
the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) during a worksession meeting on
April 28, 2025 (Present - Litner, Rediker, Hagedorn, Jensen, and Lipnick)( Absent- Tucker). Following
the conceptual presentation and discussion, the PEC offered the following feedback:
• Compare the approved deviations of SDD #42 to the proposed deviations for SDD #44.
• Present a proposed massing model including views from the South Frontage Road of the
enclosed parking garage.
• Illustrate the proposed height of the North Building on context to the Altus Vail Residences.
• Hagedorn asked about massing, views from frontage road regarding the parking garage.
• Highlight areas of conformity and compliance with the objectives and policies of the Vail
Village Master Plan.
• Discuss how both the on-site and off-site deed-restricted housing proposal nets
incremental new deed restricted housing inventory. Not creating inventory. View corridors
to be discussed.
• Present the trade-offs and public beneflts realized as a result of the proposed development.
• Explore and present ways to lessen the appearance of the building mass along South
Frontage Road elevation.
• Present a Deed-Restricted Housing Plan and address how the proposed development
advances the adopted Town of Vail Housing Goal.
• In response to neighbor input, answer questions regarding communications with adjacent
property owners, building height, density, traffic circulation, setbacks, view corridors, and
effects upon sun/shade of neighboring uses.
• Explore options to reduce the parking garage by one fioor of height above grade.
A complete copy of the PEC Meeting Results, dated 04.28.25, have been attached for reference.
Finally, the design team has used the last 90 days to continue to meet with the adjoining property
owners and Town staff to address issues and concerns as they arise within an iterative design
process. For instance, the design team has met three times with Vail Fire to understand and
respond to the life/safety and emergency vehicle access needs of the new development.
Additionally, the design team met with the Town of Vail Engineer to understand the design
requirements for access improvements located in the Town of Vail/CDOT right of way. Further, the
design team has met on numerous occasions with representatives of the Eagle River Water and
Sanitation District and Holy Cross Energy to incorporate utility design standards and requirements
into the proposed development plan.
A highly experienced design and development team, all with extensive knowledge and experience
participating on development project teams in Vail, has been assembled. To date, the team has
worked to vet various options and considerations and met frequently with Town staff and other
public agencies to ensure red-fiag issues are identifled early and addressed in the conceptual
design process.
306
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 1
SECTION 5 - PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
To facilitate the new development of the Lunar Vail Residences and the redevelopment of Apollo
Park, three development review applications are required. This section of the document identifles
the development review applications required and provides the context of their role in the proposed
development project. A written response to the criteria for review for each of the three development
applications is provided in Section 10 of this document.
The following development review applications were submitted to the Town of Vail Community
Development on July 28, 2025, for the Town’s review and approvals:
1. Creation of Special Development District No. 44 (Title 12, Chapter 9, Vail Town Code)
The purpose of the Special Development District is to encourage fiexibility and creativity in the
development of land in order to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design character
and quality of the new development with the town; to facilitate the adequate and economical
provision of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas;
and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan. An
approved development plan for a Special Development District, in conjunction with the property’s
underlying zone district, shall establish the requirements for guiding development and uses of
property included in the Special Development District. An application for approval of a Special
Development District may be flled by any owner of property to be included in the Special
Development District or his or her agent or authorized representative. Prior to site preparation,
building construction, or other improvements to land within a Special Development District, there
shall be an approved development plan for said district. The approved development plan shall
establish requirements regulating development, uses and activity within a Special Development
District.
An approved development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses and
activities of Special Development Districts. A development plan shall be approved by ordinance by
the Town Council in conjunction with the review and approval of an y Special Development District.
The development plan shall contain all relevant material and information necessary to establish the
parameters with which the Special Development District shall develop. The development plan may
consist of, but not be limited to, the approved site plan, fioor plans, building sections and elevations,
vicinity plan, parking plan, preliminary open space/landscape plan, densities and permitted,
conditional and accessory uses.
Development standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control, site
coverage, landscaping and parking shall be determined by the Town Council as part of the approved
development plan with consideration of the recommendations of the Planning and Environmental
Commission. Before the Town Council approves development standards that deviate from the
underlying zone district, it should be determined that such deviation provides benefits to the town
that outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation. This determination is to be made based on
evaluation of the proposed Special Development District’s compliance with the design criteria
outlined in the Vail Town Code.
307
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 2
Proposed deviations to the development standards of the underlying zone district include:
• Setbacks,
• Height,
• Density control,
• Site coverage,
• Landscaping, and
• Parking
For reference, a summary of the proposed development standards can be found in Section 8 herein
2. Amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan (Section VIII Vail Village Master Plan)
The Master Plan recommends both public and private improvements. As a result, it is a guide for
private landowners and the Town to use when evaluating future development opportunities. The
Master Plan provides the Town direction when formulating capital improvement programs and
establishes standards for the review of development proposals on private land. The most signiflcant
element of the Master Plan are the Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Action Steps. These are the
working tools of the Master Plan. They establish the broad framework and vision, but also lay out the
speciflc policies and action steps that will be used to implement them. The six goals and their related
objectives and policies are found in Section V of the Vail Village Master Plan. Each of the objectives
is implemented through one or more policies and action steps. Below is a list highlighting the goals
and related objectives and policies relevant and applicable to the new Lunar Vail Residences and
Apollo Park redevelopment. (Note: Bold text below indicates special emphasis added within the sub-
area recommendations for development on the Property).
GOAL #1 ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY, REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING UNIQUE
ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND
IDENTITY.
Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and
commercial facilities.
Policy 1.2.1: Additional development may be allowed as identified by the Action
Plan and as is consistent with the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design
Guide Plan.
Policy 1.2.2: Development and improvement projects shall be coordinated to
minimize the unintended negative consequences associated with construction
activity in a pedestrianized, commercial area. For instance, the noise
abatement, project completion guarantees, temporary parking, traffic control,
etc.
Objective 1.3: Enhance new development and redevelopment through public improvements
done by private developers working in cooperation with the town.
Policy 1.3.1: Public improvements shall be developed with the participation of the
private sector working with the Town.
GOAL #2 TO FOSTER A STRONG TOURIST INDUSTRY AND PROMOTE YEAR-AROUND ECONOMIC
HEALTH AND VIABILITY FOR THE VILLAGE AND FOR THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE.
308
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 3
Objective 2.1: Recognize the variety of land uses found in the 11 sub -areas throughout the
Village and allow for development that is compatible with these established land use
patterns.
Policy 2.1.1: The zoning code and development review criteria shall be consistent
with the overall goals and objectives- of the Vail Village Master Plan.
Objective 2.2: Recognize the importance of Vail Village as a mixed-use center of activities for
our guests, visitors and residents.
Policy 2.2.1: The design criteria in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan shall be
the primary guiding document to preserve the existing architectural scale and character of
the core area of Vail Village.
Objective 2.3: Increase the number of residential units available for short term
overnight accommodations.
Policy 2.3.1: The development of short-term accommodation units is strongly
encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing density levels are
required to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available for short
term overnight rental.
Objective 2.5: Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing
lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests.
Policy 2.5.1: Recreation amenities, common areas, meeting facilities and other
amenities shall be preserved and enhanced as a part of any redevelopment of lodging
properties.
Policy 2.5.2: The town will use the maximum fiexibility possible in the interpretation
of building and flre codes in order to facilitate building renovations without compromising life,
health and safety considerations.
Objective 2.6: Encourage the development of employee housing units in Vail Village
through the efforts of the private sector.
Policy 2.6.1: Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or
redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by existing zoning.
Policy 2.6.2: Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate restrictions
so as to insure their availability and affordability to the local work force.
Policy 2.6.3: The Town of Vail may facilitate in the development of affordable housing
by providing appropriate assistance.
Policy 2.6.4: Employee housing shall be developed in the Village when required by
the Town’s adopted Zoning Regulations.
GOAL #3 TO RECOGNIZE AS A TOP PRIOTITY THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE WALKING EXPERIENCE
THROUGHOUT THE VILLAGE
309
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
Objective 3.1: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other
improvements.
Policy 3.1.1: Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting and seating areas),
along adjacent pedestrian ways.
Policy 3.1.2: Public art and other similar landmark features shall be encouraged
at appropriate locations throughout the Town.
Policy 3.1.3: Flowers, trees, water features, and other landscaping shall be
encouraged throughout the Town in locations adjacent to, or visible from, public areas.
Objective 3.2: Minimize the amount of vehicular traffic in the Village to the greatest extent
possible.
Policy 3.2.1: Vehicular traffic will be eliminated or reduced to absolute minimal
necessary levels in the pedestrianized areas of the Village.
Objective 3.4: Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible
green space areas, including pocket parks and stream access.
Policy 3.4.1: Physical improvements to property adjacent to stream tracts shall
not further restrict public access.
Policy 3.4.2: Private development projects shall be required to incorporate new
sidewalks along streets adjacent to the project as designated in the Vail Village Master
Plan and/or Recreation Trails Master Plan.
Policy 3.4.3: The “privatization” of the town-owned Gore Creek stream tract shall
be strongly discouraged.
Policy 3.4.4: Encroachment of private improvements on the town-owned Gore
Creek stream tract shall be prohibited.
Policy 3.4.5: The Town shall require the removal of existing improvements
constructed without the Town’s consent within the town-owned Gore Creek stream
tract.
GOAL #4 TO PRESERVE EXISTING OPEN SPACE AREAS AND EXPAND GREENSPACE
OPPORTUNITIES.
Objective 4.1: Improve existing open space areas and create new plazas with greenspace
and pocket parks. Recognize the different roles of each type of open space in forming the overall
fabric of the Village.
Policy 4.1.1: Active recreation facilities shall be preserved (or relocated to accessible
locations elsewhere in the Village) in any development or redevelopment of property in Vail
Village.
310
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 5
Policy 4.1.2: The development of new public plazas, and improvements to existing
plazas (public art, landmarks, historic features, streetscape features, seating areas, etc.)
shall be strongly encouraged to reinforce their roles as attractive people places.
Policy 4.1.3: With the exception of ski base-related facilities, existing natural open
space areas at the base of Vail Mountain and throughout Vail Village and existing greenspaces
shall be preserved as open space.
Policy 4.1.4: Open space improvements including the addition of accessible
greenspace as described or graphically shown in the Vail Village Master Plan and/or Urban
Design Guide Plan, will be required in conjunction with private inflll or redevelopment
projects.
GOAL #5 INCREASE AND IMPROVE THE CAPACITY, EFFICIENCY, AND AESTHETICS OF THE
TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE VILLAGE.
Objective 5.1: Meet parking demands with public and private parking facilities
Policy 5.1.1: For new development that is located outside of the Commercial Core I
Zone District, on-site parking shall be provided (rather than paying into the parking fund) to
meet any additional parking demand as required by the zoning code.
Policy 5.1.3: Seek locations for additional structured public and private parkin g.
Policy 5.1.4: Continue to promote the lease parking program as a means for
maximizing the utilization of private parking spaces.
Policy 5.1.5: Redevelopment projects shall be strongly encouraged to provide
underground or visually concealed parking.
Policy 5.1.6: Development and redevelopment projects shall be strongly encouraged
to provide ample temporary parking for construction workers for the duration of a
construction project to minimize impacts on our guests and visitors resulting from the loss of
public parking.
Objective 5.4: Improve the streetscape circulation corridors throughout the Village.
Policy 5.4.1: The Town shall work with the Colorado Division of Highways toward
the implementation of a landscaped boulevard and parkway along the South Frontage
Road.
Policy 5.4.2: Medians and right-of -ways shall be landscaped.
GOAL #6 TO ENSURE THE CONTINUED IMPROVEMENT OF THE VITAL OPERATIONAL ELEMENTS OF
THE VILLAGE.
Objective 6.1: Provide service and delivery facilities for existing and new development.
Objective 6.2: Provide for the safe and efficient functions of flre, police and public utilities
within the context of an aesthetically pleasing resort setting.
311
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 6
Policy 6.2.1: Development projects and other improvements in Vail Village shall be
reviewed by respective Town departments to identify both the impacts of the proposal and
potential mitigating measures.
Policy 6.2.2: Minor improvements (landscaping, decorative paving, open dining
decks, etc.), may be permitted on Town of Vail land or right-of-way (with review and approval
by the Town Council and Planning and Environmental Commission when applicable) if Town
operations such as snow removal, street maintenance and flre department access and
operation are able to be maintained at current levels. Special design (i.e. heated pavement),
maintenance fees, or other considerations may be required to offset impacts on Town
services.
The following citations from the Vail Village Master Plan provide reference and context to the Plan’s
intended purposes and role in the development review process:
“The Vail Village Master Plan is not intended to be regulatory in nature but is intended to provide a
general framework to guide decision making.” VVMP August, 2012
“There is a need to continually maintain
and upgrade the quality of existing
buildings, as well as streets, walks and
utility services. Vail's economy relies to a
large degree on maintaining its overall
status and attractiveness as a world-class
resort.” VVMP August, 2012
“…a consensus emerged that additional
development was acceptable, even
desirable, as long as it did not significantly
alter the existing character of the Village.”
VVMP, August, 2012
“Upgrading buildings - Vail Village has not
escaped the aging process. There is a need to encourage the continued upgrading and enhancement
of existing lodging and commercial facilities within the Village in order to maintain the unique
character that is its main attraction.” VVMP, August 2012
“The building height element formalizes the pattern that has evolved in the Village --low buildings in
the core area with larger buildings on the northern periphery (along South Frontage Road), with
openings framing views of Vail-Mountain” VVMP, August 2012
“It is important to note that the likelihood of project approval will be greatest for those proposals that
can fully comply with the Vail Village Master Plan.” VVMP, August 2012
BUILDING HEIGHT PLAN
Generally speaking, it is the goal of this Plan to maintain-the concentration of low scale buildings in
the core area while positioning larger buildings along the northern periphery (along the Frontage
Road), as depicted in the Building Height Proflle Plan. This pattern has already been established and-
Subject Site
Village Core
312
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 7
in some cases these larger structures
along, the Frontage Road serve to
frame views over Vail Village to Vail
Mountain. The Building Height Plan
also strives, in some areas, to
preserve major views from public
rights-of-way.
The building heights expressed on
this Illustrative Plan are intended to
provide general guidelines.
Additional study should be made
during speciflc project review relative
to a building's height impact and the
streetscape and relationship to
surrounding structures. Speciflc design considerations on building heights are found in the Sub -Area
section of this Plan and in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan.
A major goal of this Plan is to
address the Village as a whole and at
the same time be sensitive to the
opportunities and constraints that
may exist on a site-speciflc basis. To
facilitate long range planning unique
to each area of the Village, ten
different sub-areas are delineated in
this Plan.
Each of the ten sub-areas have been
evaluated relative to the overall
goals, objectives, and policies
outlined for Vail Village. The
potential improvement projects,
referred to as sub-area concepts,
which have emerged from this evaluation are graphically represented on the Action Plan. These sub -
area concepts are physical improvements intended to reinforce the desired physical form of the
Village as outlined in the various elements of the Master Plan.
The 10 sub-areas (which follow), provide detailed descriptions of each sub-area concept and express
the relationship between the speciflc sub -area concepts and the overall Plan. The applicable goals
and objectives are cited for each of the sub area concepts at the end of each description under
"special emphasis." The sub-area concepts described in this Section are meant to serve as advisory
guidelines for future land use decisions by the Planning and Environmental Commission and the
Town Council.
Subject
Site
Subject Site East Frontage Road
Sub-Area #9
313
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 8
The East Frontage Road Sub-Area is
comprised of condominium and time
share residential development. This
sub-area is unique in that its access
is directly off of the Frontage Road,
causing little vehicular impact on
other areas of the Village. Large areas
of surface parking within the sub-area
provide the opportunity for additional
residential inflll development. Given
proper attention to design
considerations, this sub-area could
provide additional density within
close proximity to the Village core. At the present time, the sub-area is separated from the Village
core by Gore Creek. This sub-area has a pedestrian connection with the Village and Ford Park-via
the Village Streamwalk. The area between buildings and Gore Creek must be improved to enhance
natural environment.
#9-1 Parking Lot Inflll Residential inflll
over existing surface parking. Height
of building to be limited so as to not
impede view corridors from the
Frontage Road (and Interstate 70) to
the Village and Vail Mountain. Mass
of buildings to step back from the
Frontage Road to prevent sun/shade
impacts on the road. Satisfying
parking demand on site will
necessitate structured parking. A
substantial landscape buffer shall be
provided between any new
development and the Frontage Road
without jeopardizing future frontage
road improvements. Special
emphasis on 1.2, 2.3, 2.6, 3.1, 3.4,
5.4, 6.1.
Lunar Vail intends to submit a
development application proposing
amendments to the East Frontage Road sub-area of the Vail Village Master Plan relating to the
Building Height Plan and Action Plan. The proposed amendments are to ensure compatibility
amongst surrounding and potential uses in the area and maintain the developing character of the
neighborhood. To amend the Vail Village Master Plan, it shall be the responsibility of Lunar Vail to
demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following:
314
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 9
• How conditions have changed since the Plan was adopted,
• How the Plan is in error, or
• How the addition, deletion, or change to the Plan is in concert with the Plan in general.
3. Amendment to an Existing Conditional Use Permit (Title 12, Chapter 16, Vail Town Code)
A conditional use permit is intended to provide the fiexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of
the Zoning Regulations of the Vail Town Code. Because of their unusual or special characteristics,
conditional uses require review and evaluation so that they may be located properly with respect to
the purposes of the Zoning Regulations and with respect to their effects on surrounding properties.
The review process prescribed is intended to assure compatibility and harmonious development
between conditional uses and surrounding properties and the Vail community at large. Uses listed
as conditional uses in the various districts may be permitted subject to such conditions and
limitations as may be prescribed to ensure that the location and operation of a conditional uses will
be in accordance with development objectives of the Town and will not be detrimental to other uses
or properties.
The Administrator may approve amendments to an existing conditional use permit (including, but not
limited to, additions to buildings and structures associated with the use, changes to the operation of
the use, changes to the previous conditions of approval and the like) if the Administrator determines
the amendment meets the following criteria:
(1) The amendment is in accordance with all applicable elements of this code and the
Vail Comprehensive Plan;
(2) The amendment does not alter the basic character or intent of the original conditional
use permit; and
(3) The amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare.
All amendments to an existing conditional use permit not meeting the above listed criteria, as
determined by the Administrator, shall be reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission
in accordance with the procedures described in the Vail Town Code.
Pursuant to Section 12-6H-3(R), Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, timeshare units are allowed in
the HDMF district, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit. As shared, the Apollo Park
timeshare units were created and have been continuously operated on the Property since before
1990.
The Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park design and development team is looking forward to
collaborating with the Town of Vail and the Vail community through the development review and
entitlement processes.
315
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 1
SECTION 6 – DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING PROGRAM
This section of the document provides a written summary and visual references of the overall
development and building program proposed on the Property. A complete set of development plans
and detailed description of the proposed development standards, including a breakdown of uses and
square footages can be found in Section 7 and Section 8, respectively, herein.
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park are intended to be Vail’s newest high-end, multiple family
residential development. Within a short walking distance of Vail Village along the Gore Creek Trail,
all day southerly sun exposure, and exceptional Vail Mountain and Gore Range views, this new
residential development is sure to be a highly desired residential address within the Vail community.
To bring this unique opportunity to life, a total of thirty -seven (37) residential homes, thirty-six (36)
timeshare units, and two (2) deed-restricted homes will be constructed on the Property. A mix of
homes, ranging from modestly sized one-bedroom units, up to larger, more spacious, four-bedroom
units are planned for development. The two, generously sized, on-site deed-restricted homes are
sure to please any Vail resident living and working specifically within the Town of Vail. Uniquely
drafted, these two deed restrictions aim to serve only persons employed by businesses within the
Town of Vail
Vehicle parking is provided entirely on the Property. A total of 125 on-site vehicle parking spaces are
located within the fully enclosed parking garage. There a no exterior surface parking spaces
proposed. This approach to vehicle parking continues the highly desired development pattern within
the neighborhood of fully enclosing and screening all vehicle parking from public view. As required
316
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 2
of the Tyrolean Condominiums, the Vail Mountain View Residences and the Altus Vail Residences,
the Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park will have no surface parking on -site. This approach to
parking is unique to this east Vail Village neighborhood. Multipl e elevators and interior staircases
provide access throughout the parking garage and to the residential dwelling units above. A separate
front door building entrance is designed at the northwest corner of the parking garage on Level P0 to
ensure easy access into the residential building above and to the pedestrian sidewalk located
adjacent to the Property and along the South Frontage Road.
The new development of the Lunar Vail Residences and the redevelopment of Apollo Park are
contained within two separate buildings on the Property. One building, appropriately referred to as
the “Riverfront” building, is located on the southern half of the Property overlooking Gore Creek and
the Gore Creek Trail. The Riverfront building includes twelve (12) residential dwelling units and thirty-
six (36) timeshare units. The Riverfront building is divided into two separate sub-buildings, joined by
an interior party wall, with one sub -building on the east, and a second on the west of the party wall.
Once constructed, and as structurally designed, each of the sub-buildings can remain freestanding
on its own if ever necessary. The redeveloped timeshare units of Apollo Park are situated in the west
half of the Riverfront building and the residential dwelling units of the Lunar Vail Residences are in
the east half. A second building is located atop the enclosed parking garage podium on the northern
half of the Property. This “North” building includes the remaining nineteen (19) residential dwelling
units, two (2) deed-restricted dwelling units for community housing, and the enclosed parking garage
structure. An outdoor swimming pool, landscaping, an outdoor plaza with barbeque grills and tables,
casual seating areas and fire pits are conveniently located between the Riverfront building and the
North building on the Plaza Level of the site for owner enjoyment.
317
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 3
All vehicles enter and exit the Property from the South Frontage Road. Once on site, vehicles access
the fully enclosed parking garage at one of two parking garage entrances. One entrance is located
immediately adjacent to the South Frontage Road on the north end of the garage at Level P0, and a
second entrance is provided on the south end of the garage at Level P1. The south end entrance is
accessed via a two -way, snow-melted, drive aisle situated along the easterly edge of the Property.
The north garage entrance provides access to parking provided on Level P0 while the south garage
entrance provides access to the lower three
levels of the parking structure (Levels P1 – P3). This approach to the parking garage entry and
circulation assures the greatest utilization and efficiency of use of the parking garage. The two -way
drive aisle also serves as the required emergency vehicle access to the on -site emergency vehicle
staging area located on the Plaza Level in the center portion of the Property. Emergency vehicle
access to the center portion of the Property is a life/safety requirement of the adopted codes of the
Town of Vail and must be maintained. The emergency access has been designed to the meet the
stringent requirements of the Vail Fire Department.
318
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 1
SECTION 7 – FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Lunar Vail and its design and development team have prepared a final plan set for the new Lunar Vail
Residences and the redevelopment of Apollo Park. Development review applications were
submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for final review on July 28, 2025.
Final approval of the development is subject to the approval of a new special development district
and development plan, pursuant to Article 12-9A, Special Development (SDD) District, Vail Town
Code; an amended conditional use permit, pursuant to Chapter 12-16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail
Town Code; and an amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan, located at 442 South Frontage Road
West/Tract D, Vail Village Fifth Filing.
A complete set of the final development plans is attached as Exhibit A for reference.
319
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
SECTION 8 - LAND USE SUMMARY AND ZONING ANALYSIS
According to Section 12-9A-9, Development Standards, Vail Town Code,
“Development standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height,
density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking shall be determined by the
Town Council as part of the approved development plan with consideration of the
recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission .”
This section of the document provides a summary of the land uses proposed on the Property and
analyzes the requested zoning and development standards. In doing so, the proposed
development standards are compared to the development standards prescribed for the High-
Density Multi-Family district with any deviations noted. Following a recommendation from the
Planning and Environmental Commission, the proposed development standards will be presented
to the Vail Town Council for review and approval. The proposed development standards were
developed with the recommendations of the Vail Village Master Plan in mind.
Address: 442 South Frontage Road East
Legal Descriptions:
- Lunar Vail Residences: Part of Bldg. A & B, Tract D, Vail Village Filing 5
- Apollo Park : Bldg. A & B, Tract D, Vail Village, Filing 5
Parcel #’s :
- Lunar Vail Residences: 2101-08-227-006
- Apollo Park: 2101-08-246-039
Land Use Designation:
• Village Master Plan
o (East Frontage Road Sub-Area #9)
o (Medium/High Density Residential)
o (4 Story Building Height)
o (Residential/Lodging Inflll)
“This sub-area is unique in that its access is directly off of the Frontage Road, causing little vehicular
impact on other areas of the Village. Large areas of surface parking within the sub -area provide the
opportunity for additional residential infill development. Given proper attention to design
considerations, this sub-area could provide additional density within close proximity to the Village
core. A sidewalk along the Frontage Road should be constructed to improve pedestrian safety and
further connect the Village parking structure to Ford Park. The area between buildings and Gore Creek
must be improved to enhance natural environment.”
“#9-1 Parking Lot Infill - Residential infill over existing surface parking. Height of
building to be limited so as to not impede view corridors from the frontage road (and
Interstate 70) to the Village and Vail Mountain. Mass of buildings to step back from the
Frontage Road to prevent sun/shade impacts on the road. Satisfying parking demand
320
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
on site will necessitate structured parking. A substantial landscape buffer shall be
provided between any new development and the Frontage Road without jeopardizing
future frontage road improvements. Special emphasis on 1.2, 2.3, 2.6, 3.1, 3.4, 5.4,
6.1.”
Zoning: High Density Multi-Family Residential (HDMF district)
Lot Size: 56,347 sq. ft./1.2925 acres
Buildable Area: 53,203 sq. ft./1.221 acres
GSA Hazards: (per Town of Vail Geologic Hazard Maps)
• Rockfall – None
• Debris Flow – None
• Snow Avalanche – None
Gore Creek Floodplain: N/A
Development Standards (HDMF district):
• Uses:
o Lunar Vail Residences – Multiple family residential dwelling units
o Apollo Park – Multiple family timeshare units
Development
Standard
Allowed Proposed Deviation
Lot Size 10,000 sq. ft. min. 56,347 sq. ft. N/A
Buildable Area: 10,000 sq. ft. min. 53,203 sq. ft. N/A
Density
(dwelling units)
25 du’s per acre of
buildable area or
31 du’s total
60 du’s per acre of buildable area
or
73 du’s total
+35 du’s/acre
+42 du’s total
(240%)
GRFA 0.76 of buildable area
or 40,434 sq. ft
LVR South: 30,225 sq. ft.
LVR North: 52,663 sq. ft.
Apollo Park: 29,920 sq. ft.
Total: 112,808 sq. ft.
+72,374 sq.
ft.
(280%)
Site Coverage 55% or 30,991 sq. ft. Above grade: 64% or 36,302 sq. ft.
Below grade: 71% or 40,273 sq. ft.
+ 9% or 5,311
sq. ft.
Height 48 ft LV R South: +/- 63 ft
LVR North: +/- 77.8 ft
Apollo Park: +/- 66.2 ft
+ 15 ft
+ 29.8 ft
+ 18.2 ft
Setbacks Front: 20 ft
Sides: 20 ft
Rear: 20 ft
20 ft
20 ft/1 ft
20 ft
--
(-) 19 ft
--
321
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
Landscape 30% or 16,890 sq. ft. 28% or 15,943 sq. ft. -2% or -947
sq. ft.
Parking 125 parking spaces per
Chapter 10, Zoning
Regulations
LVR South &
LVR North: 76 (2.05 ea.)
Lock-off’s: 11 (1 ea.)
Apollo Park: 36 (1 ea.)
EHU’s 2 (1 ea.)
Guest 8
Total: 133 spaces
+8 parking
spaces
12-6H-5 LOT AREA AND SITE DIMENSIONS.
The minimum lot or site area shall be 10,000 square feet of buildable area, and each site shall have a minimum
frontage of 30 feet. Each site shall be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area, 80 feet on each side,
within its boundaries. The site area is 56,347 square feet, or 1.2925 acres, in size with a minimum frontage of
greater than 30 feet and can enclose an area greater than 80 feet on each side, within its boundaries.
12-6H-6 SETBACKS.
The minimum front setback shall be 20 feet, the minimum side setback shall be 20 feet and the
minimum rear setback shall be 20 feet. The proposed minimum front, rear and east side setbacks
are 20 feet. The west side minimum setback is 1 foot. A total of 1,436 sq. ft. of building area is
in the west side setback mainly below grade.
322
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
12-6H-7 HEIGHT.
For a fiat roof or mansard roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed 45 feet. For a sloping roof, the
height of buildings shall not exceed 48 feet. The maximum proposed building height is 77.8 feet at
the southerly edge of the Lunar Vail North building.
Building Height Plan with Existing and Finish Grades
12-6H-8 DENSITY CONTROL.
(A) (1) Not more than 76 square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted for each
100 square feet of buildable site area. Total density shall not exceed 25 dwelling units per acre of
buildable site area. The proposed gross residential floor area is 2.4 square feet for each 100
square feet of buildable site area. The proposed total density is 60 dwelling units per
buildable acre.
(2) Each accommodation unit shall be counted as one-half of a dwelling unit for purposes of
calculating allowable units per acre. No accommodation units are proposed.
(B) A dwelling unit in a multiple-family building may include one attached accommodation unit no
larger than one-third of the total floor area of the dwelling. A total of 11 attached
accommodation units are proposed and no unit is larger than one-third of the total floor area
of the dwelling unit.
323
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
Typical Attached Accommodation Units
12-6H-9 SITE COVERAGE.
Site coverage shall not exceed 55% of the total site area. The proposed site coverage is 64 % of the
total site area above grade and 71% below grade.
Site Coverage Plan
324
RUTHER ASSOCIATES 4
12-6H-10 LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT.
At least 30% of the total site area shall be landscaped. The minimum width and length of any area
qualifying as landscaping shall be 15 feet with a minimum area not less than 300 square feet. 28% of
the total site area is proposed to be landscaped per the Vail Town Code. This is inclusive of
2,058 square feet of landscape area proposed atop portions of the North building.
Landscape Lighting and Snow Storage Plan
12-6H-11 PARKING AND LOADING.
Off-street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this title. At least 75% of the
required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings and hidden from public view or shall be
completely hidden from public view from adjoining properties within a landscaped berm. No parking shall be in any
required front setback area. 100% of the required parking is located within the main building and totally hidden
from public view. No parking is proposed in the front setback area. A total of 1 33 parking spaces are
proposed.
Partial Parking Garage Plan
325
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 1
SECTION 9 - PUBLIC BENEFITS
As per the Vail Town Code, before the Town Council approves development standards that deviate
from the underlying zone district, it should be determined that such deviation provides benefits to
the town that outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation. This determination is to be made based
on evaluation of the proposed Special Development District’s compliance with the design criteria
outlined in the Vail Town Code. This section of the document provides a list of the benefits to the Vail
community which outweigh any adverse effect of the deviations proposed. For context of value, the
list quantifies and qualifies these benefits into measured metrics.
Lunar Vail has submitted a development application requesting approval for the creation of Special
Development District No. 44. A special development district application is the most appropriate
approach to redeveloping the Property given the unique characteristics (nonconformities and
existing conditions) of the site and desired development goals and objectives of the Vail community.
Development standards within a special development district, including lot area, site dimensions,
setbacks, height, density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking shall be determined by the
Town Council as part of the approved development plan with consideration of the recommendations
of the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Deviations to the development standards of the underlying zone district (HDMF) include:
• Setbacks,
• Height,
• Density control,
• Site coverage,
• Landscaping, and
• Parking
Lunar Vail is committed to produce substantial benefits to the Vail community that not only outweigh
any adverse effects of deviation from the development standards listed above, but also ensure that
the new development advances the overall development goals and objectives of the Town of Vail. The
public benefits include:
• A fee in lieu payment to the Town of Vail Housing Fund in an amount to be negotiated with
the Vail Town Council which exceeds the obligation resulting from inclusionary zoning
requirements, per the Employee Housing Plan. Per Vail Town Code, a minimum of 8,249
square feet of deed-restricted housing is required. As proposed, 9,955 square feet of deed-
restricted housing will be provided via a fee in lieu payment and 2,419 square feet will be
accommodated on-site.
• Two, on-site, deed-restricted community housing units specifically restricted to only
persons living and working within the Town of Vai are proposed. The two units total 2,419
square feet in size and are amply suited for individuals, couples, or families.
• A fee in lieu payment to the Town of Vail Gore Creek Stream Tract Fund in the amount of
$150,000 to allow the Town to complete much needed riparian corridor restoration,
enhancements and improvements.
326
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 2
• The implementation of a short-term rental program intended to increase the annual
occupancy of the new residential dwelling units thereby having the potential to increase
and sustain annual Town of Vail sales and lodging tax collections.
• The granting of an easement for emergency vehicle ingress, egress and staging to The Wren
Condominiums currently without suitable access. As a beneficiary of this easement,
redundant emergency vehicle access on The Wren property is avoided.
• Installation of +/- 5,500 square feet of off-site landscape enhancements and improvements
in the Town of Vail right of way along the South Frontage Road as recommended by the Vail
Village Streetscape Master Plan.
• Constructing, operating and maintaining +/- 2,100 square feet of snow melt heating system
to that portion of the pedestrian sidewalk immediately adjacent to the Property.
• 100% of the required vehicle parking is located within an enclosed parking garage totally
hidden from public view and completely hidden from adjoining properties.
• The integration and installation of a visual public art component into the design and
architecture of the new buildings with an estimated value of more than $200,000.
Decorative custom metal panel grates as an example of public art installation
327
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 1
SECTION 10 - DEMONSTRATION OF REVIEW CRITERIA COMPLIANCE
To facilitate the new development of the Lunar Vail Residences and the redevelopment of Apollo
Park, three development review applications are required. This section of the document identifles
the review criteria for compliance and demonstrates how each of the development applications
complies with the criteria for review and approval.
The Applicant is proposing to create Special Development District No. 44, Lunar Vail Residence s
and Apollo Park, to facilitate development on the Property. Section 12-9A-8, Design Criteria and
Necessary Findings, Vail Town Code, establishes the design criteria and the findings necessary to
approve a new special development district. As stated, it shall be the burden of the applicant to
demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the
following standards, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical
solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved.
A written response to the criteria for review for each of the three development applications is
provided below.
1. Creation of Special Development District No. 44 (Title 12, Chapter 9, Vail Town Code)
(1) Compatibility. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment,
neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk,
building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation,
328
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 2
Applicant Response:
The proposed development plan is compatible with the neighborhood and adjacent properties
with respect to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character and
orientation.
Architectural Design:
The proposed buildings comply with the adopted architectural design guidelines of Vail Village
and the Town of Vail. The exterior building materials are a mix of stone, stucco and wood siding .
Each of the buildings have sloping roof forms. Exterior balconies and decks are proposed to add
architectural and visual interest and break up the exterior wall facades. Unlike other
developments in the neighborhood, an intentional act was taken to incorporate a pedestrian-
oriented front entry into the North building. The front door entry and stepping back and stepping
down of the North building along the South Frontage Road bring a pedestrian scale to the
building.
Scale and Bulk:
The scale and bulk of the building is compatible with location of site relative to Vail Village. As
recommended within the Vail Village Master Plan, larger-scaled, taller buildings and structures
are recommended along the northern periphery of Vail Village. Similar to the Vail Mountain View
Residences and Altus Vail Residences, the proposed scale and bulk of the building is driven in
large part by the requirement to place the vehicle parking below grade within a fully enclosed
parking garage. Further, in keeping with the exact constraints facing redevelopment in
329
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 3
Lionshead Village, added scale and bulk is required to replace the existing Apollo Park timeshare
units on the site. As a policy, the Town recognized the need to economically incentivize
redevelopment through increase in zoning and development standards. While the Property is
not located in Lionshead Village, similar limitations to redevelopment apply.
Building Height:
The maximum height of the buildings are 77.8 ft (Lunar Vail North), 66.2 ft (Apollo Park), and 63
ft (Lunar Vail South), respectively. A copy of the Building Height Plan has been attached for
reference. This is a deviation from the permitted building height prescribed for the High-Density
Multiple Family District. As a result, the proposed development plan mitigates the added
building height required by placing the South building into areas of slopes greater than 40%. In
doing so, this allows for the first two stories of the building to be buried entirely below grade yet
maintain the necessary egress requirements and have south facing exposure. This is an
instance where steep slopes benefit development.
Building Height Context Plan
The added building height is warranted on the Property to achieve the Town’s development goals
and objectives. Again, similar to Lionshead Village, where zoning incentives were created out of
necessity to achieve the Town’s redevelopment objectives, the added building height
accommodates the replacement of the 36 timeshare dwelling units existing on the Property and
the replacement of the surface parking lot with an enclosed parking garage.
The added height is further warranted by the requirement to accommodate emergency vehicle
access to the southerly reaches of the site. But for the requirement of a 24-foot wide emergency
access road and 41 foot wide turnaround and staging area, which occupies more than 7,500
square feet of site area, more of the buildings could be at the ground level. In this instance, the
requirement for emergency vehicle access displaces the building up in height instead of out in
area.
Buffer Zones (Setbacks):
330
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 4
The proposed development plan complies with the purposes and intent of buffer zones and
setbacks ensuring adequate separation between uses. As a result of the redevelopment, the
existing buildings are removed from within the setbacks and compliance is achieved. This
change in setback increases the size of the buffer zones between the existing and proposed
buildings. Of significance, the new buildings are pulled back to the north to fully comply with
the rear setback along the Gore Creek riparian corridor. In addition, a series of off-site wooden
retaining walls are proposed to be removed from the Gore Creek Stream Tract and restored to
a more natural condition.
There are two areas of encroachment into the 20-foot side setback. Each of those areas is
along the west side property line. One of the areas of encroachment is located entirely below
grade and totally hidden from view. This encroachment accommodates much needed storage
space for Apollo Park. The second area of encroachment is partially above and below grade
and planted with landscape to appear as a raised planting bed. This area accommodates a
vehicle ramp within the enclosed parking garage. The raised planting bed has been designed
to mimic an existing stone site wall on the Altus Vail Residences property.
331
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 5
Brick paver path connecting down to the Gore Creek Trail
All buffer zones and setback areas will be planted with landscape to the extent permitted by
the Vail Town Code, Wildland Fire Regulations, and utility provider limitations.
Character and Orientation:
The character and orientation of the proposed development plan is a function of the size and
configuration of the Property. Different from Lot 1, the View Mountain View Residences and
Altus Vail Residences property, which is squarer in its configuration, the proposed development
site is more pie-shaped or rectangular. As a result, future development on the Property yields a
more north/south orientation of the building rather than an east/west orientation. Of similar
consideration, the frontage of the building envelope along the South Frontage Road is
approximately 85 feet while the depth of the building envelope is up to 285 feet.
332
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 6
A sun/shade analysis was produced to demonstrate the impact of a north/south oriented
building on the Property. This analysis demonstrates that the proposed building orientation has
little to no impact on adjacent uses and structures.
Sun/Shade Analysis – Winter Solstice
(2) Relationship. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and
workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity,
Applicant Response:
A compatible, efficient and workable relationship is proposed amongst surrounding uses and
activities. The proposed development includes a total of 73 dwelling units and two deed-
restricted housing units. 36 of the dwelling units are a replacement of 40 existing timeshare
units within Apollo Park. 37 of the dwelling units are net new dwelling units being added to the
Property. Consistent with the recommendations of the Vail Village Master Plan, and in keeping
with the surrounding uses on the adjacent properties, no commercial uses are proposed. The
proposed development plan complies with the purposes of the High-Density Multiple Family
(HDMF) District.
333
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 7
Vicinity Map, 2025
(3) Parking and loading. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in
Chapter 10 of this title,
Applicant Response:
The parking and loading program proposed within the development plan complies with the
requirements of Chapter 10, Title 12, Vail Town Code . A total of 133 vehicle parking spaces are
provided within the fully enclosed parking garage. No surface parking is proposed. As per the
requirements of Chapter 10, a minimum of 125 parking spaces are required. Eight surplus
parking spaces are available for guest parking.
A functional trash removal and recycling program is provided at the north entrance to Level PO
of the parking garage.
(4) Comprehensive Plan. Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail
Comprehensive Plan, town policies and urban design plans,
Applicant Response:
The proposed development plan conforms with the applicable elements of the Vail
Comprehensive Plan and Town policies. Conformity with the applicable elements is
summarized below:
Vail Village Master Plan
334
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 8
GOAL #1 ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY, REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING UNIQUE
ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF
COMMUNITY AND IDENTITY.
Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and
commercial facilities.
Policy 1.2.1: Additional development may be allowed as identified by the Action
Plan and as is consistent with the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design
Guide Plan.
Policy 1.2.2: Development and improvement projects shall be coordinated to
minimize the unintended negative consequences associated with construction
activity in a pedestrianized, commercial area. For instance, the noise
abatement, project completion guarantees, temporary parking, traffic control,
etc.
Objective 2.3: Increase the number of residential units available for short term
overnight accommodations.
Policy 2.3.1: The development of short-term accommodation units is strongly
encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing density levels
are required to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available
for short term overnight rental.
Objective 2.6: Encourage the development of employee housing units in Vail Village
through the efforts of the private sector.
Policy 2.6.1: Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or
redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by existing zoning.
Policy 2.6.2: Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate restrictions
so as to insure their availability and affordability to the local work force.
GOAL #3 TO RECOGNIZE AS A TOP PRIOTITY THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE WALKING
EXPERIENCE THROUGHOUT THE VILLAGE
Objective 3.1: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and
other improvements.
Policy 3.1.1: Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting and seating
areas), along adjacent pedestrian ways.
335
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 9
Policy 3.1.2: Public art and other similar landmark features shall be encouraged
at appropriate locations throughout the Town.
Policy 3.1.3: Flowers, trees, water features, and other landscaping shall be
encouraged throughout the Town in locations adjacent to, or visible from, public
areas.
Objective 3.4: Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible
green space areas, including pocket parks and stream access.
Policy 3.4.1: Physical improvements to property adjacent to stream tracts shall
not further restrict public access.
Policy 3.4.2: Private development projects shall be required to incorporate new
sidewalks along streets adjacent to the project as designated in the Vail Village
Master Plan and/or Recreation Trails Master Plan.
Policy 3.4.3: The “privatization” of the town-owned Gore Creek stream tract shall
be strongly discouraged.
Policy 3.4.4: Encroachment of private improvements on the town-owned Gore
Creek stream tract shall be prohibited.
Policy 3.4.5: The Town shall require the removal of existing improvements
constructed without the Town’s consent within the town-owned Gore Creek
stream
Objective 5.4: Improve the streetscape circulation corridors throughout the Village.
Policy 5.4.1: The Town shall work with the Colorado Division of Highways toward
the implementation of a landscaped boulevard and parkway along the South
Frontage Road.
Policy 5.4.2: Medians and right-of -ways shall be landscaped.
GOAL #6 TO ENSURE THE CONTINUED IMPROVEMENT OF THE VITAL OPERATIONAL
ELEMENTS OF THE VILLAGE.
Objective 6.1: Provide service and delivery facilities for existing and new development.
Objective 6.2: Provide for the safe and efficient functions of fire, police and public
utilities within the context of an aesthetically pleasing resort setting.
336
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 10
Policy 6.2.1: Development projects and other improvements in Vail Village shall
be reviewed by respective Town departments to identify both the impacts of the
proposal and potential mitigating measures.
Policy 6.2.2: Minor improvements (landscaping, decorative paving, open dining
decks, etc.), may be permitted on Town of Vail land or right-of-way (with review
and approval by the Town Council and Planning and Environmental Commission
when applicable) if Town operations such as snow removal, street maintenance
and fire department access and operation are able to be maintained at current
levels. Special design (i.e. heated pavement), maintenance fees, or other
considerations may be required to offset impacts on Town services.
”The Vail Village Master Plan is not
intended be regulatory in nature, but
is intended to provide a general
framework to guide decision
making.” VVMP August, 2012
“There is a need to continually
maintain and upgrade the quality of
existing buildings, as well as streets,
walks and utility services. Vail's
economy relies to a large degree on
maintaining its overall status and
attractiveness as a world-class
resort.” VVMP August, 2012
“…a consensus emerged that additional development was acceptable, even desirable, as
long as it did not significantly alter the existing character of the Village.” VVMP, August, 2012
“Upgrading buildings - Vail Village has not escaped the aging process. There is a need to
encourage the continued upgrading and enhancement of existing lodging and commercial
facilities within the Village in order to maintain the unique character that is its main
attraction.” VVMP, August 2012
“The building height element formalizes the pattern that has evolved in the Village --low
buildings in the core area with larger buildings on the northern periphery (along South
Frontage Road), with openings framing views of Vail-Mountain” VVMP, August 2012
“It is important to note that the likelihood of project approval will be greatest for those
proposals that can fully comply with the Vail Village Master Plan.” VVMP, August 2012
Vail Housing 2027 Plan
Subject Site
Village Core
337
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 11
The Vail Housing 2027 Plan adopted a Town goal of acquiring 1,000 incremental new resident
housing deed restrictions by the year 2027. The development plan proposes to aid the Vail
community in not only achieving the goal, but hopefully exceeding the housing goal. To do so, the
development plan proposes the following:
✓ Record deed restrictions on two, on-site, Type III, employee housing units. The two, new
on-site units total 2,419 square feet in size with two bedrooms and two bathrooms each.
One parking space is provided on site for each unit.
✓ Remit a fee in lieu payment to the Town of Vail/Vail Local Housing Authority exceeding
and mitigating the inclusionary zoning requirement for 82,491 square feet of net new
GRFA (84,910 sq ft – 2,491 sq ft = 82,491 sq ft total new GRFA). As is the practice of the
Town of Vail, the amount of the fee in lieu payment will be determined by the Vail Town
Council, subject to an adopting ordinance. That Applicant, however, anticipates that
payment to be more than $4.5M.
(5) Natural and/or geologic hazard. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or
geologic hazards that affect the property on which the Special Development District is
proposed,
Applicant Response:
The Property is impacted by up to 3,144 of site area with slopes greater than 40%. A portion of
the South building encroaches into this area . However, as the site is being excavated to the
north, away from the steepness of the slope, there are no negative impacts created. It does
appear from an inspection of the site, and the presence of existing retaining walls, both on and
off the site, the steep slopes were created as a result of the Apollo Park development . The
existing conditions appear to be the result of the original grading of the site whereby the spoils
were pushed down the slope towards Gore Creek. This condition is evident on the Apollo Park
site and the Wren Condominiums site.
Area of man-made Slope >40%
338
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 12
(6) Design features. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions
designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural
features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community,
Applicant Response:
The development plan produces a development that is responsive and sensitive to the natural
features, vegetation, and overall aesthetic quality of the Vail community. There are no remaining
natural features on the Property following the original construction of Apollo Park. When
originally constructed, a variance was granted allowing the structures to encroach into the east,
south and west setback areas. Of concern, this approval allowed the structures to impact the
most natural of features on the Property, the Gore Creek Stream Tract. The proposed
development plan moves the buildings to the north further away from the Stream Tract.
Additionally, while the development plan does not propose any added disturbance to the Stream
Tract, as a stated public benefit, the Applicant has offered to fund up to $150,000 of Gore Creek
Stream Tract restoration work to revegetate and enhance those areas resulting from the
construction of Apolo Park.
Architectural Site Section
339
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 13
(7) Traffic. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing
on and off-site traffic circulation,
Applicant Response:
A functional circulation system is designed to address the needs of both pedestrians and
vehicles on and off the Property. To that end, the highlights of the circulation system include:
✓ A site access plan that was designed at the direction of the Town of Vail Engineer.
✓ An emergency vehicle access and staging plan that was informed by an experienced
life/safety consultant and the Vail Fire Department.
✓ A system of pedestrian sidewalks and pathways which directs pedestrian flow internally
on the site as well as connects to the Gore Creek Trail and the South Frontage Road
sidewalk.
(8) Landscaping. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to
optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function; and
Applicant Response:
The Applicant has submitted a landscape plan that is both functional and aesthetic. As per the
Vail Town Code, Landscaping is defined as,
“Natural or significant rock outcroppings, native vegetation, planted areas and
plant materials, including trees, shrubs, lawns, flowerbeds and ground
cover, shall be deemed landscaping together with the core development
such as walks, decks, patios, terraces, water features and like features not
occupying more than 20% of the landscaped area ”.
As designed, the landscape plan takes full advantage of all landscape planting opportunities
afforded, including 2,058 square feet of green roof planting and an additional 3,015 square feet
of landscape improvements in the right of way, as recommended by the Vail Village Master Plan.
Each of these locations is readily visible from the public way and adjacent properties.
Landscaping and decorative paving surround all sides of the Property ensuring a pleasant and
inviting pedestrian and outdoor plaza experience. Ornamental shrubs and bushes, perennials,
and annual flowers are proposed to provide a wide variety of textures and seasonal color to the
site, as well as to fully comply with the Town’s adopted wildland fire protection regulations. As
planned, the landscaping materials do not interfere with the pedestrian walkways, drive aisles
or snow storage requirements.
((9) Workable plan. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable,
functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the Special
Development District.
Applicant Response:
The Applicant intends to submit a minor subdivision of the site pending the review of the three
development review applications initially submitted. The purpose of the subdivision will be to
340
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 14
establish a new condominium map creating ownership interest of the new improvements on
the Property.
2. Amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan (Section VIII Vail Village Master Plan)
This section of the document lists the review criteria for consideration of an amendment to the Vail
Village Master Plan. As discussed herein, the Applicant has submitted a development application to
amend the Conceptual Building Height Plan within the Vail Village Master Plan. More speciflcally, the
amendment proposes to increase the conceptual building height recommendations for the Property
from 4 stories to 5 – 6 stories. Contained within are the Applicant’s responses and demonstration of
how the Amendment complies with the review criteria. Of importance, to be recommended for
approval, the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission is to flnd that the Applicant ha s
demonstrated compliance with at least one of the following review criteria:
• How conditions have changed since the Plan was adopted,
Applicant’s Response:
Much has changed since the adoption of the Vail Village Master Plan in 1990. The Town of Vail, and
Vail Village more speciflcally, experienced a signiflcant rejuvenation as a result of Vail’s New Dawn in
341
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 15
the late 1990’s and the early 2000’s. Vail’s New Dawn brought more than $2.5 billion of private sector
reinvestment into the Vail community. A large percentage of this investment was realized within
areas governed by the Vail Village Master Plan, including the Vail Mountain View Residences, Vail’s
Front (aka Vail Chalets), Altus Vail Residences, Solaris Vail, Vail Plaza Hotel (aka Sebastian Hotel)
and the Four Seasons Vail. All were redeveloped with the fiexibility and consideration of special
development districts. Unlike Lionshead Village, where impactful economic zoning incentives were
created to incentivize redevelopment, special development districts and deviations from underlying
development standards were relied upon to achieve the Town’s adopted development goals and
objectives. Similarly, an updated master plan was relied upon to facilitate the redevelopment and
reinvestment. Today, that same planning document is now nearly 25 years older and amendments
are necessary, on a case by case basis, to remain relevant.
• How the Plan is in error, and/or
Applicant’s Response:
The Vail Village Master Plan is not necessarily in error, though an amendment adds credibility to the
Plan in general as it recognizes ever changing conditions affecting the success of the 35-year old
document.
• How the addition, deletion, or change to the Plan is in concert with the Plan in general.
Applicant’s Response:
Generally speaking, it is the goal of this
Plan to maintain-the concentration of
low scale buildings in the core area
while positioning larger buildings along
the northern periphery (along the
Frontage Road), as depicted in the
Building Height Proflle Plan. This
pattern has already been established,
and expanded upon, and-in some
cases these larger structures along,
the Frontage Road serve to frame views
over Vail Village to Vail Mountain. The
Building Height Plan also strives, in
some areas, to preserve major views
from public rights-of-way.
The building heights expressed on this Illustrative Plan are intended to provide general guidelines.
Additional study should be made during speciflc project review relative to a building's height impact
and the streetscape and relationship to surrounding structures.
Subject
Site
342
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 16
The Applicant is proposing to amend the Vail Village Master Plan Conceptual Building Height Plan to
increase the recommended conceptual building height from 4 stories to 5 – 6 stories. This
amendment is in concert with the Plan in general and justifled for the following reasons:
✓ The recommended height is compatible with the recommendations of the Plan and existing
conditions of the surrounding structures such as the Altus Vail Residences and The Wren
Condominiums. While recommended for 4 stories of building height, the Town found that the
Altus Vail Residences compiled with the development goals of the Plan.
✓ Even though no public view corridors exist, the north/south orientation of the Property
naturally maintains views to Vail Mountain between the Lunar Vail Residences North Building
and Altus Vail Residences and a future Wren Condominium where the same 5 to 6 stories of
structures is currently recommended. When practical, the Town encourages a north/south
orientation of buildings to maintain a peek of a view for many, rather than a view of a peak for
only a few. This amendment carries out that design direction.
✓ As designed, the new Lunar Vail Residences North building steps back at the upper fioors to
maintain a pedestrian scale along the South Frontage Road sidewalk and allows a greater
amount of sunlight to reach the ground.
✓ The Plan recommends that taller buildings, like Altus Vail Residences, Solaris, Vail Village Inn,
The Four Seasons, and the Scorpio Condominiums, which are up to six stories in height, are
located along the northern periphery of Vail Village. The Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo
Park development site is similarly located along the northern periphery of the Vail Village.
343
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 17
GOAL #1 ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY, REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING UNIQUE
ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND
IDENTITY.
Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and
commercial facilities.
Policy 1.2.1: Additional development may be allowed as identified by the Action
Plan and as is consistent with the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design
Guide Plan.
Policy 1.2.2: Development and improvement projects shall be coordinated to
minimize the unintended negative consequences associated with construction
activity in a pedestrianized, commercial area. For instance, the noise
abatement, project completion guarantees, temporary parking, traffic control,
etc.
Objective 2.3: Increase the number of residential units available for short term
overnight accommodations.
Policy 2.3.1: The development of short-term accommodation units is strongly
encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing density levels are
required to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available for short
term overnight rental.
Objective 2.6: Encourage the development of employee housing units in Vail Village
through the efforts of the private sector.
Policy 2.6.1: Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or
redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by existing zoning.
Policy 2.6.2: Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate restrictions
so as to insure their availability and affordability to the local work force.
GOAL #3 TO RECOGNIZE AS A TOP PRIOTITY THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE WALKING EXPERIENCE
THROUGHOUT THE VILLAGE
Objective 3.1: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other
improvements.
Policy 3.1.1: Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting and seating areas),
along adjacent pedestrian ways.
Policy 3.1.2: Public art and other similar landmark features shall be encouraged
at appropriate locations throughout the Town.
344
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 18
Policy 3.1.3: Flowers, trees, water features, and other landscaping shall be
encouraged throughout the Town in locations adjacent to, or visible from, public areas.
Objective 3.4: Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible
green space areas, including pocket parks and stream access.
Policy 3.4.1: Physical improvements to property adjacent to stream tracts shall
not further restrict public access.
Policy 3.4.2: Private development projects shall be required to incorporate new
sidewalks along streets adjacent to the project as designated in the Vail Village Master
Plan and/or Recreation Trails Master Plan.
Policy 3.4.3: The “privatization” of the town-owned Gore Creek stream tract shall
be strongly discouraged.
Policy 3.4.4: Encroachment of private improvements on the town-owned Gore
Creek stream tract shall be prohibited.
Policy 3.4.5: The Town shall require the removal of existing improvements
constructed without the Town’s consent within the town-owned Gore Creek stream
Objective 5.4: Improve the streetscape circulation corridors throughout the Village.
Policy 5.4.1: The Town shall work with the Colorado Division of Highways toward
the implementation of a landscaped boulevard and parkway along the South Frontage
Road.
Policy 5.4.2: Medians and right-of -ways shall be landscaped.
GOAL #6 TO ENSURE THE CONTINUED IMPROVEMENT OF THE VITAL OPERATIONAL ELEMENTS OF
THE VILLAGE.
Objective 6.1: Provide service and delivery facilities for existing and new development.
Objective 6.2: Provide for the safe and efficient functions of fire, police and public
utilities within the context of an aesthetically pleasing resort setting.
Policy 6.2.1: Development projects and other improvements in Vail Village shall
be reviewed by respective Town departments to identify both the impacts of the
proposal and potential mitigating measures.
Policy 6.2.2: Minor improvements (landscaping, decorative paving, open dining
decks, etc.), may be permitted on Town of Vail land or right-of-way (with review and
approval by the Town Council and Planning and Environmental Commission when
applicable) if Town operations such as snow removal, street maintenance and fire
department access and operation are able to be maintained at current levels. Special
design (i.e. heated pavement), maintenance fees, or other considerations may be
required to offset impacts on Town services.
345
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 19
”The Vail Village Master Plan is not intended be regulatory in nature, but is intended to provide a
general framework to guide decision making.” VVMP August, 2012
“There is a need to continually maintain
and upgrade the quality of existing
buildings, as well as streets, walks and
utility services. Vail's economy relies to a
large degree on maintaining its overall
status and attractiveness as a world-class
resort.” VVMP August, 2012
“…a consensus emerged that additional
development was acceptable, even
desirable, as long as it did not significantly
alter the existing character of the Village.”
VVMP, August, 2012
“Upgrading buildings - Vail Village has not
escaped the aging process. There is a need to encourage the continued upgrading and enhancement
of existing lodging and commercial facilities within the Village in order to maintain the unique
character that is its main attraction.” VVMP, August 2012
“The building height element formalizes the pattern that has evolved in the Village --low buildings in
the core area with larger buildings on the northern periphery (along South Frontage Road), with
openings framing views of Vail-Mountain” VVMP, August 2012
“It is important to note that the likelihood of project approval will be greatest for those proposals that
can fully comply with the Vail Village Master Plan.” VVMP, August 2012
3. Amendment to an Existing Conditional Use Permit (Title 12, Chapter 16, Vail Town Code)
A conditional use permit is intended to provide the fiexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of
the Zoning Regulations of the Vail Town Code. Because of their unusual or special characteristics,
conditional uses require review and evaluation so that they may be located properly with respect to
the purposes of the Zoning Regulations and with respect to their effects on surrounding properties.
The review process prescribed is intended to assure compatibility and harmonious development
between conditional uses and surrounding properties and the Vail community at large. Uses listed
as conditional uses in the various districts may be permitted subject to such conditions and
limitations as may be prescribed to ensure that the location and operation of a conditional use will
be in accordance with development objectives of the Town and will not be detrimental to other uses
or properties.
The Administrator may approve amendments to an existing conditional use permit (including, but not
limited to, additions to buildings and structures associated with the use, changes to the operation of
Subject Site
Village Core
346
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 20
the use, changes to the previous conditions of approval and the like) if the Administrator determines
the amendment meets the following criteria:
(1) The amendment is in accordance with all applicable elements of this code and
the Vail Comprehensive Plan;
Applicant Response:
Pursuant to Section 12-6H-3(R), Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, timeshare units are allowed in
the HDMF district, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit. As shared, the Apollo Park
timeshare units were created and have been continuously operated on the Property since before
1990. The use of the timeshare units has remained in compliance with the Vail Town Code as
documented by the Town of Vail staff. The timeshare units advance the Town’s development goals
and objectives by adding to the variety and diversity of lodging options for Vail’s visiting guests.
(2) The amendment does not alter the basic character or intent of the original
conditional use permit; and
Applicant Response:
As proposed, the redevelopment of the existing timeshare units will be replaced on a same for same,
like for like basis. Only a slight increase in GRFA is proposed. This increase in GRFA is mainly a result
of maintaining compliance with the Town’s adopted building and flre codes for construction. There
is no change in timeshare intervals or interval ownership proposed. The Apollo Park timeshare units
have been in existence since the early 1970’s and are very much an established land use in the
neighborhood. Their conditioned presence does not alter the basic character of the neighborhood.
(3) The amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare.
Applicant Response:
As noted in #2 above, the use and operation of the existing timeshare units does not fundamentally
change as a result of the proposed redevelopment. To date, that use and operation has not been a
cause for concern with respect to the public health, safety and welfare. In fact, the use is
complementary to the 40 or so timeshare units at The Wren Condominiums, immediately adjacent
to Apollo Park.
347
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 1
SECTION 11 – RECOMMENDED FINDINGS
This section of the document highlights the necessary findings that the Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission and/or the Vail Town Council shall make when taking final action on each
of the three development review applications. In this instance, the Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission serves in an advisory role to the Vail Town Council on the request for the
creation of the new special development district and the proposed amendment to the Vail Village
Master Plan. As such, the Planning Commission is tasked with forwarding a recommendation to the
Vail Town Council on two of the three development applications. With respect to the amended
conditional use permit application, the Planning Commission serves as the final decision-maker.
The Applicant recognizes that a final action by the PEC on the conditional use permit application
shall be conditioned upon the approval of both the new special development district and master plan
amendment applications by the Vail Town Council. Recommended findings for each application are
noted below.
1. New Special Development District
As per the Vail Town Code, before recommending and/or granting an approval of an application for a
Special Development District, the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Town Council
shall make the following findings with respect to the proposed SDD:
(1) That the SDD complies with the design standards listed in subsection (A) of this section,
unless the applicant can demonstrate that one or more of the standards is not applicable, or
that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved ,
348
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 2
(2) That the SDD is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the
Vail Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the development objectives of the town,
(3) That the SDD is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the
surrounding areas; and
(4) That the SDD promotes the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the town and
promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that
conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a re sort
and residential community of the highest quality.
Finding:
Based upon the review of development application (PEC25-0026), the criteria prescribed by the Vail
Town Code, and the evidence and testimony during the public hearing, the Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission finds that the Applicant has demonstrated compliance with the nine
design review criteria for the creation of a new special development district, the four findings listed
above, and as noted in Section 10 of this document. More specifically, the Commission finds that
the Applicant has demonstrated that PEC25-0026 is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives
and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the development
objectives of the town, is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the
surrounding areas; and that the SDD promotes the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the
town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that
conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort an d
residential community of the highest quality . As such, the Commission recommends approval of
the application to the Vail Town Council.
349
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 3
2. Vail Village Master Plan Amendment
To be recommended for approval, the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission is to find
that the Applicants have demonstrated compliance with at least one of the following review criteria:
• How conditions have changed since the Plan was adopted,
• How the Plan is in error, and/or
• How the addition, deletion, or change to the Plan is in concert with the Plan in general.
Finding:
Based upon the review of development application (PEC25-0025), the criteria prescribed by the Vail
Town Code, and the evidence and testimony during the public hearing, the Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission finds that the Applicant has demonstrated compliance with at least one
of the review criteria listed above as noted in Section 10 of this document. More specifically, the
Commission finds that the Applicant has demonstrated that conditions have changed since the Plan
was adopted and said change in conditions warrants a recommendation of approval of the request,
as presented.
3. Amended Conditional Use Permit
The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting
an amendment to a conditional use permit:
(1) The amendment is in accordance with all applicable elements of this code and
the Vail Comprehensive Plan;
(2) The amendment does not alter the basic character or intent of the original
conditional use permit; and
350
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC 4
(3) The amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare.
Finding:
Based upon the review of development application (PEC25-0024), the criteria prescribed by the Vail
Town Code, and the evidence and testimony during the public hearing, the Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission approves PEC25-0024 and finds that the application complies with the
three review criteria listed above and as noted in Section 10 of this document. More specifically, the
Commission finds that the Applicant has demonstrated that the application is in accordance with
the elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, does not alter the character or intent of the original
conditional use permit, and will not adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare.
351
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 1 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK: APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY: RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE:05.08.2025
VICINITY MAP
~ NOT TO SCALE ~
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 1 OF 5
A PORTION OF TRACT D, VAIL VILLAGE FIFTH FILING, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT D;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 325.19 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT D TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 70;
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 71 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 125.32 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST 110.45 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 35.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST 35.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 133.46 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF TRACT D;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT D, SOUTH 47 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST 137.0
FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT D, SOUTH 79 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 145.78 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING,
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN BUILDINGS A AND B, APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF
FILED FOR RECORD AND CONDOMINIUM DECLARATIONS FOR APOLLO PARK AT VAIL.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NO. ABC50063954-5
1. MONUMENTS AT ALL MAJOR PROPERTY CORNERS HAVE BEEN FOUND OR SET AS SHOWN HEREON.
2. THE ADDRESSES LISTED ON THE TITLE COMMITMENT IS- 442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
EAGLE COUNTY PARCEL NO'S - 2101-082-27-006 & 2101-082-46-039
3. PER FEMA MAP NUMBER: 08037C0488D HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 12/04/2007, THE SITE IS LOCATED IN ZONE X BEING DEFINED AS
AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN.
4. THE GROSS LAND AREA: 56,347 SQUARE FEET OR 1.293 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
5. VERTICAL RELIEF SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON A POST PROCESSED STATIC GNSS CONNECTION MADE TO NGS POINT SPRADDLE (PID:
AB2083) BEING A FOUND STANDARD NGS ROCK CAP IN A ROCK OUTCROPPING AS NOTED IN THE NGS DATA SHEET AND HAVING A
PUBLISHED ELEVATION PER TOWN OF VAIL GPS CONTROL 2022 MAP OF 8287.38' (NAVD88)
CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN HEREON AT 1' INTERVALS
6(a). NO ZONING REPORT OR LETTER WAS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CLIENT OR THE CLIENT’S
DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE - PER THE OFFICIAL TOWN OF VAIL ZONING MAP ADOPTED BY TOWN COUNCIL PER RESOLUTION NO. 13,
SERIES OF 2000, OCTOBER 17, 2000 - MAP UPDATED JUNE 21, 2024 - THE SUBJECT PARCEL IS ZONE HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE-FAMILY
(HDMF)
6(b). NO ZONING REPORT OR LETTER WAS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CLIENT OR THE CLIENT’S
DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE
8. SUBSTANTIAL FEATURES OBSERVED IN THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK ARE SHOWN HEREON.
9. THERE WERE THIRTY-FOUR (34) OBSERVED FULL REGULAR PARKING SPOTS, THREE (3) HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPOTS AND
THREE (3) WHAT APPEAR TO BE TRANSPORT VAN PARKING SPOTS.
11(a). NO PLANS AND/OR REPORTS WERE PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT
11(b). UTILITY LOCATES WERE PROVIDED BY ACCURATE UNDERGROUND, LTD.
13. NAMES OF ADJOINING OWNERS ACCORDING TO CURRENT TAX RECORDS ARE SHOWN HEREON.
16. DURING THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK, THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT EARTH MOVING WORK, BUILDING
CONSTRUCTION, OR BUILDING ADDITIONS OBSERVED.
17. DURING THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK, THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT STREET OR SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION
OR REPAIRS OBSERVED AND NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CONTROLLING JURISDICTION CONCERNING
PROPOSED CHANGES IN STREET RIGHT OF WAY LINES.
20. GRAVITY FED PIPE INVERT ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON.
OPTIONAL TABLE A ITEMS: (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(a), 6(b), 7(a), 7(b)(1), 7(c), 8, 9, 11(a)(b), 13, 16, 17 AND 20)
THIS CERTIFICATION DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED PERSONS OR LEGAL ENTITIES WITHOUT WRITTEN RECERTIFICATION EXPRESSLY
NAMING SUCH PERSONS OR LEGAL ENTITIES.
TO OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AND LUNAR VAIL LAND INVESTMENTS, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2021 MINIMUM
STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND
INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(a), 6(b), 8, 9, 11(a)(b), 13, 16, 17 AND 20 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELDWORK WAS COMPLETED ON MAY 5, 2025.
PURSUANT TO COLORADO REVISED STATUTE 38-51-106 (1)(D) AND COLORADO STATE BOARD OF LICENSURE FOR PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYORS RULE 1.6(B)(2), THE UNDERSIGNED FURTHER CERTIFIES THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE, IS
BASED UPON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE, AND THIS
CERTIFICATION IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
DATE OF MAP/PLAT:
05.08.2025
RY P. RUSK, PLS 38226
EMAIL: RRUSK@FORESIGHTWEST.COM
SIGNATURE AND DATE THROUGH SEAL:
(REQUIRED BY COLORADO LAW)
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION:
1. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS DISCLOSURE REQUIRED PER 13-80-105, C.R.S.:
NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS
AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN
TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.
2. STATEMENT OF LINEAL UNITS REQUIRED PER 38-51-106(1)(L), C.R.S.: LINEAL UNIT OF MEASURE USED IN THIS SURVEY IS U.S. SURVEY FOOT.
3. THE BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY REPRESENT A PROFESSIONAL OPINION BY THIS SURVEYOR AS TO WHERE THE BOUNDARY LINES
HEREBY RETRACED WERE ORIGINALLY LAID OUT ON THE GROUND AND SUBSEQUENTLY ACCEPTED BY THE AFFECTED LAND OWNERS. THE
DISCOVERY OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE MAY RESULT IN A DIFFERENT OPINION.
4. ALL COPYRIGHTS TO PUBLICATIONS BY FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING, INC. ARE RESERVED. ADDITIONALLY, ALL FIELD BOOKS, NOTES, SKETCHES
AND ELECTRONIC FILES ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE SOLE PROPERTY OF FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING, INC. IF THIS
SURVEY IS DEPOSITED WITH THE COUNTY IN COMPLIANCE WITH 38-51-107, C.R.S., FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING, INC. ACCEPTS NO LIABILITY FROM
PROPRIETARY OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION DISCLOSED TO THE PUBLIC BY THE CONTENTS HEREIN.
5. PRESERVATION OF BOUNDARY MONUMENTATION: ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES:
1) ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT (DEFINED BY 38-53-103(18), C.R.S. AS ANY LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT ESTABLISHED ON THE GROUND BY A
CADASTRAL SURVEY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND ANY MINERAL SURVEY MONUMENT ESTABLISHED BY A UNITED STATES MINERAL
SURVEYOR AND MADE A PART OF THE UNITED STATES PUBLIC LAND RECORDS), OR
2) ANY LAND SURVEY CORNER (DEFINED BY 38-53-103(6), C.R.S. AS ANY LAND SURVEY CORNER THE POSITION OF WHICH CONTROLS THE LOCATION OF
THE BOUNDARIES OF A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND), OR A RESTORATION OF ANY SUCH MONUMENT, EVEN IF SAID PERSON HAS TITLE TO THE LAND ON
WHICH SAID MONUMENT IS LOCATED, COMMITS A CLASS 2 MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY A FINE OF UP TO $1,000 AND/OR 1 YEAR IN JAIL UNLESS,
PRIOR TO SUCH REMOVAL, SAID PERSON HAS CAUSED A COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR TO ESTABLISH AT LEAST TWO WITNESS
CORNERS OR REFERENCE MARKS FOR EACH SUCH MONUMENT REMOVED AND HAS FILED OR CAUSED TO BE FILED A MONUMENT RECORD PURSUANT
TO ARTICLE 53 OF TITLE 38, C.R.S. (18-4-508, C.R.S.)
6. OIL, GAS, COAL, MINERAL, WATER, DITCH, RESERVOIR, GEOTHERMAL, AVIGATION, GRAZING OR OTHER RIGHTS, AS WELL AS DEVELOPMENT, ZONING,
LEASE, FIRE DISTRICT OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS, BOTH RECORDED AND UNRECORDED, MAY AFFECT THIS PROPERTY AND NOT BE PLOTTABLE
GRAPHICALLY HEREON.
7. THE LOCATIONS OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT TO BE CONSIDERED ALL-INCLUSIVE AND MAY BE INACCURATE.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS MAY HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM AVAILABLE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND AS-BUILT MAPS, SURFACE MARKINGS
ESTABLISHED BY INDEPENDENT LOCATORS OR UTILITY COMPANIES, OR FROM SURFACE FEATURES. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON HAVE
NOT BEEN EXPOSED BY THIS FIRM AND MAY VARY IN ACTUAL LOCATION, USAGE, MATERIAL, SIZE AND/OR EXISTENCE. THIS FIRM ACCEPTS NO
LIABILITY FOR INACCURATE WORK BY UTILITY LOCATORS. PER TITLE 9, ARTICLE 1.5, C.R.S., UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MUST BE MARKED PRIOR TO ANY
DIGGING OR DRILLING BY SUBMITTING A REQUEST TO THE UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO. CALL (811) AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE.
NO UTILITY PLANS WERE PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT IN REGARD TO TABLE A ITEM 11(A). PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES WERE PROVIDED BY ACCURATE
UNDERGROUND, LTD.
8. ANY OVERHEAD WIRES SHOWN HEREON ARE GENERALIZED LOCATIONS SHOWING THE WIRE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN UTILITY POLES AND OTHER
STRUCTURES. THE LOCATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL WIRES WERE NOT MEASURED AND THEIR REPRESENTATION ON THIS DRAWING SHOULD NOT BE RELIED
UPON WHERE ACCURATE CLEARANCE DISTANCES FROM OVERHEAD WIRES ARE REQUIRED.
9. ALL USERS OF THIS SURVEY ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT THIS SURVEY IN NO WAY CONSTITUTES A TITLE SEARCH BY FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING
INC. FOR DETERMINATION OF (A)RIGHT TO TITLE, (B)CHAIN OF TITLE/ABSTRACT, (C)THE HISTORICAL COMPATIBILITY OF ALL DESCRIPTIONS OF THIS
PROPERTY WITH ALL DESCRIPTIONS OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES, AND (D)EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD THAT
MAY IMPACT TITLE TO THIS PROPERTY. ADDITIONALLY, UNWRITTEN RIGHTS TO THIS PROPERTY MAY EXIST WHICH ARE UNKNOWN TO THIS FIRM. A
REASONABLE EFFORT WAS MADE TO RESEARCH THE RECORDS FOR THIS PROPERTY AND THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
USUAL AND CUSTOMARY STANDARD OF CARE FOR LAND SURVEYORS PRACTICING IN COLORADO.
10. TITLE POLICY REFERENCE: FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING RIGHT TO TITLE AND EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR OTHER TITLE BURDENS
AFFECTING SUCH RIGHT TO TITLE TO THIS PROPERTY, THIS SURVEY RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT ISSUED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, ORDER NO. ABC50063954-5, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 12.27.2024 AT 5:00 P.M..
11. BUILDING SETBACK NOTICE: DUE TO FREQUENT CHANGES IN AND DIFFERING INTERPRETATIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCES, THE OWNER IS URGED
TO CONTACT THE GOVERNING MUNICIPALITY(IES) FOR GUIDANCE RELATING TO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO PLANNING FUTURE
IMPROVEMENTS ON THIS PROPERTY. NO ZONING REPORT OR LETTER CITING SETBACK RESTRICTIONS WAS PROVIDED.
12. BASIS OF BEARINGS STATEMENT REQUIRED PER 38-51-106(1)(E), C.R.S.:
BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON THE EAST LINE OF THE CONDOMINIUM MAP OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION RECORDED SEPT. 5, 1978 AT REC. NO.
171103 AND AMENDED CONDOMINIUM MAP OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION RECORDED JUNE 9, 1981 AT REC. NO. 220646 BEING MONUMENTED
AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER BY A FOUND NO.4 REBAR WITH A 1.25" RED CAP STAMPED IN PART "PLS 27958" AND AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER BY A
FOUND NO.4 REBAR WITH THE LINE BETWEEN ASSUMED TO BEAR SOUTH 00° 02' 00" WEST PER SAID CONDOMINIUM MAPS.
13. VERTICAL RELIEF SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON A POST PROCESSED STATIC GNSS CONNECTION MADE TO NGS POINT SPRADDLE (PID: AB2083)
BEING A FOUND STANDARD NGS ROCK CAP IN A ROCK OUTCROPPING AS NOTED IN THE NGS DATA SHEET AND HAVING A PUBLISHED ELEVATION PER
TOWN OF VAIL GPS CONTROL 2022 MAP OF 8287.38' (NAVD88) - CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN HEREON AT 1' INTERVALS
14. MEASURED DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON REFLECT THE RESULTS OF A LEAST SQUARES ADJUSTMENT OF THE FIELD MEASUREMENTS.
15. ALL FOUND AND SET MONUMENTS ARE FAIRLY CLOSE TO GROUND SURFACE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
16. THIS SURVEY WAS HAMPERED BY SNOW COVER WHICH MAY HAVE CONCEALED FEATURES NOT SHOWN HEREON.
17. ANY MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON THAT ARE NOT TIED TO THIS SURVEY WERE NOT USED AS CONTROL CORNERS AND ARE SHOWN FOR
POSTERITY ONLY.
18. PER THE TOWN OF VAIL WATERCOURSE SETBACK MAP, GORE CREEK, WHICH IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO A 50'
SETBACK REQUIREMENT AS MEASURED FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE ESTABLISHED CREEK OR STREAM CHANNEL USING THE PRIMARY DEFINITION
OF "CHANNEL" AS SET FORTH IN WEBSTER'S II NEW RIVERSIDE UNIVERSITY DICTIONARY: "CHANNEL - A STREAM OR RIVERBED". - SAID SETBACK IS
SHOWN HEREON.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS, OR CLAIMS THEREOF, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT THAT COULD BE ASCERTAINED BY AN
INSPECTION OF THE LAND OR THAT MAY BE ASSERTED BY PERSONS IN POSSESSION OF THE LAND. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
2. EASEMENTS, LIENS OR ENCUMBRANCES, OR CLAIMS THEREOF, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
3. ANY ENCROACHMENT, ENCUMBRANCE, VIOLATION, VARIATION, OR ADVERSE CIRCUMSTANCE AFFECTING THE TITLE THAT WOULD BE
DISCLOSED BY AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE LAND SURVEY OF THE LAND AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. (STANDARD
EXCEPTION)
4. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL HERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT
SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
5. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CLAIMS OR OTHER MATTERS, IF ANY, CREATED, FIRST APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR
ATTACHING SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF BUT PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE PROPOSED INSURED ACQUIRES OF RECORD
FOR VALUE THE ESTATE OR INTEREST OR MORTGAGE THEREON COVERED BY THIS COMMITMENT. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
6. (A) TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITY THAT LEVIES TAXES
OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS; (B) PROCEEDINGS BY A PUBLIC AGENCY THAT MAY RESULT IN TAXES
OR ASSESSMENTS, OR NOTICES OF SUCH PROCEEDINGS, WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN BY THE RECORDS OF SUCH AGENCY OR BY THE PUBLIC
RECORDS. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
7. (A) UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C)
WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
8. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES, IF ANY. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
9. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE
OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 11, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475. (IMPACTS
SUBJECT PROPERTY - NOT PLOTTABLE)
10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES
PATENT RECORDED JULY 11, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475. (IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - NOT PLOTTABLE - NO DITCHES OR CANALS
WERE OBSERVED DURING THE COURSE OF THE FIELD SURVEY)
11. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GROUND LEASE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 05, 1978 IN BOOK 274 AT PAGE 693 AND ASSIGNMENT
THERETO RECORDED NOVEMBER 17, 1978 IN BOOK 278 AT PAGE 682.
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF GROUND LEASE RECORDED JUNE 27, 2006 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200616928.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - NOT A SURVEY MATTER)
12. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF VAIL VILLAGE FIFTH FILING RECORDED
NOVEMBER 12, 1966 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 102538 AND THE MAP OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1978 IN BOOK 274 AT
PAGE 697. (IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
13. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF SERVICE AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1978 IN BOOK 275 AT PAGE 599.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
14. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR
RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY,
HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE
EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER
15, 1965, IN BOOK 187 AT PAGE 353, AMENDMENT RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1984 IN BOOK 393 AT PAGE 492, AMENDMENT RECORDED JANUARY
15, 1987 IN BOOK 455 AT PAGE 933, AND AMENDMENT RECORDED AUGUST 2, 1989 IN BOOK 488 AT PAGE 378.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - NO RESTRICTIONS APPEAR TO BE SURVEY MATTERS)
15. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DECLARATION BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE,
COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY,
OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR
RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 05, 1978 IN BOOK 274 AT PAGE 696.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - APPURTENANT EASEMENTS CONTAINED WITHIN SAID DOCUMENT ARE NOT PLOTTABLE AND ARE BLANKET
IN NATURE.)
16. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF CABLE TELEVISION EASEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 08, 1997 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 611627.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - BLANKET IN NATURE OVER ALL OF TRACT 3, VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING - NOT PLOTTABLE)
17. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN EASEMENT DEED RECORDED
JUNE 19, 1980 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200646. (IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
18. 40' ACCESS EASEMENT, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, SHOWN ON INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 09, 1981, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 220646.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - APPROXIMATE SCALED LOCATION PLOTTED HEREON - NO DIMENSIONS ON PLOTTED)
19. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS
EASEMENTS AND TERMINATION OF SERVICE AGREEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 05, 2008 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200825627.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
SHEDULE B, PART II - EXCEPTIONS - OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NO. ABC50063954-5
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
4
1
:
3
3
A
M
35
2
SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING EASEMENT
ALIQUOT LINE
FOUND REBAR AND CAP AS DESCRIBED HEREON
FOUND REBAR - NO CAP AS DESCRIBED HEREON
FOUND ALIQUOT CORNER AS DESCRIBED HEREON
SET MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED HEREON
(R) - RECORD BEARING & DISTANCES PER THE APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION CONDOMINIUM PLAT RECORDED
AT REC. NO.'S 220646 & 17113
(R1) - RECORD BEARING & DISTANCE PER THE ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES CONDOMINIUM PLAT RECORDED AT REC. NO.
202124189 AND THE VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE GREEK RECORDED AT REC. NO. 202211953
(M) - FIELD MEASURED BEARING & DISTANCES
50' STREAM SETBACK
EDGE OF WATER AS OF 04.14.2025
CENTER-LINE OF GORE CREEK AS OF 04.14.2025
F1
F5
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598" UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598"
UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
F3
F1
F1
F3
F1
S7
1
°
3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
9
9
.
9
4
'
(
M
)
N7
1
°
4
0
'
2
2
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
3
'
(
M
)
N02°51'12"W(M)
35.44'(M)
N48
°
0
2
'
4
8
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
M
)
N7
9
°
4
7
'
5
3
"
W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N7
9
°
4
6
'
0
0
"
W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
R
)
N47
°
5
5
'
0
7
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
R
)
N02°55'07"W(R)(R1)
35.54'(R)(R1)
N00°02'00"W 583.42'(M)S00°02'00"E 324.97'(M)S00°02'00"E 325.19'(R)
S7
1
°
3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
2
5
.
5
3
'
(
M
)
N7
1
°
4
3
'
5
5
"
W
1
2
5
.
3
2
'
(
R
)
40' ACCESS & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646 & 171103
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "D"
(SCH.B-II # 12 & 18)
DR
I
V
E
W
A
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
RE
C
.
N
O
.
2
0
0
8
2
5
6
2
7
(S
C
H
.
B
-
I
I
#
1
9
)
DUMPSTER & REFUSE LICENSE AREA
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825628
PRIVATE VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ASSOCIATION EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(PARKING, LANDSCAPING & SNOW STORAGE)
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
APP
R
O
X
.
30'
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
REC
.
N
O
.
2
2
0
6
4
6
(SE
E
S
U
R
V
E
Y
O
R
'
S
N
O
T
E
"
A
"
)
(SC
H
.
B-II
#
1
2
&
1
7
)
ERW
S
D
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
NOT
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
D
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
THE WREN
CONDOMINIUM BUILDING "A"
CONDOMINIUM MAP OF
THE WREN
OWNER: WREN ASSOCIATION
LEONARD L. McCOY, PE & PLS 2432
JAN. 9, 1975 IN BOOK 244, PAGE 32
REC. NO. 140183
AMENDED AND RESTATED TO THE CONDOMINIUM PLAT
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK
OWNER: VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
JULY 12, 2022 - REC. NO. 202211953
CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
KENNETH E. RICHARDS - PE & PLS 2183
SEPT. 5, 1978 - BOOK 274, PAGE 697 - REC. NO. 171103
AMENDED CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
JAMES L. WHEAT, RLS 12488
JUNE 9, 1981 - BOOK 324, PAGE 281 - REC. NO. 220646
CDOT PARCEL 29 REV 3
FAP I70-2(7)183
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1450
RULE AND ORDER
BK. 219 - PG. 441
JAN. 5, 1971
F4
ACCEPTED AS
THE NE CORNER
OF THE WREN
REC. NO. 140183
NO
R
T
H
L
I
N
E
T
R
A
C
T
D
,
V
A
I
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
,
F
I
F
T
H
F
I
L
I
N
G
RE
C
.
N
O
.
1
0
2
5
3
8
10' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 102538 (SCH.B-II #12)
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "B"
S57
°
3
5
'
1
1
"
E
(
R
)
30.00'
40.00'
10.00'
N01°27'02"E 110.50'(M)
N01°28'07"E 110.45'(R)
F5
N7
1
°
3
9
'
4
8
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
8
'
(
R
1
)
CONDOMINIUM PLAT
ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES
OWNER: ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES OWNERS' ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
OCT. 26, 2021 - REC. NO. 202124189
20.00'
HOLY CROSS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200634246
N86°56'58"E(M)
35.53'(M)
N87°04'53"E(R)(R1)
35.53'(R)(R1)
N
4
2
°
0
0
'
3
7
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N
4
2
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
4
6
'
(
R
)
UNABLE TO SET
FALLS ON PART OF BOULDER WALL
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
1/4 CORNER SEC. 8 & SEC. 5
FOUND 2.5" PIPE WITH 3.25"
BRASS BLM CAP STAMPED IN
PART " BUREAU OF LAND
MANAGEMENT - U.S.
CADASTRAL SURVEY - T5S
R80W - 1/4 S5 -S8 - 1978"
BASIS OF BEARING
EDGE OF WATER ON
04.14.2025
CENTER-LINE OF GORE
CREEK AS DEFINED
04.14.2025
50.00'
TRACT A
(GORE CREEK)
VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING
OWNER: TOWN OF VAIL
E. MAX SERAFINI - PE & PLS 2568
NOVEMBER 15, 1965 - REC. NO.
102538
LAND SURVEY PLAT
TRACT A AND TRACT G, VAIL VILLAGE
FIFTH FILING
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
DEPOSITED FEB. 11, 2011 IN BOOK 1
OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S
LAND SURVEY PLAT/RIGHTS-OF-WAY
SURVEYS AT PAGE 781
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
50.00' STREAM SETBACK AS
DEFINED BY THE CENTER-LINE
OF GORE CREEK ON 04.14.2025
N48
°
0
4
'
4
8
"
W
1
9
6
.
6
1
'
(
R
1
)
N01°28'07"E 110.61'(R1)
N
4
2
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
4
'
(
R
1
)
7.5'
0.2'
33.1'
26.3'
12.0'
13
.
3
'
7.6'
23
.
4
'
54.49' (R)
BUILDING "B"
FOOTPRINT
BUILDING "A"
FOOTPRINT
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
N44°
1
5
'
4
1
"
W
(
M
)
154.
4
6
'
(
M
)
N7
3
°
4
2
'
2
9
"
W
(
M
)
27
3
.
1
0
'
(
M
)
S25°
3
4
'
0
0
"
W
(
M
)
81.5
9
'
(
M
)
ORIGINAL 100' R.O.W. FOR U.S. HIGHWAY 6
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS STATE HIGHWAY 78)
FAP 25-A(I)
IN
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
7
0
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
L
Y
R
.
O
.
W
.
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 2 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 2 OF 5
A. THE CENTER-LINE OF THE 30' UTILITY EASEMENT SHOWN ON REC. NO.'S 220646 & 171103 (APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION)
HAS A DEFINED BEARING AND WIDTH BUT DOES NOT HAVE A DEFINED LOCATION. THE LOCATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED
UPON THAT SHOWN ON THE ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY RECORDED NOV. 29, 2005 IN BOOK 1 OF THE EAGLE COUNTY
SURVEYOR'S LAND SURVEY PLATS AT PAGE 571 PREPARED BY MICHAEL J. POST PLS 30116
B. THE 10' UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE EAST LINE OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION (REC. NO.'S 220646 & 171103) BEING
THE SAME AS THE EAST LINE OF TRACT D, VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING ONLY SHOWS ON THE VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING PLAT
PER REC. NO. 102538. FWS DID NOT RECOVER ANY DOCUMENTS INDICATING THAT THIS EASEMENT WAS VACATED PER THE
CONDOMINIUM PLAT OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION. THE VALIDITY OF THIS EASEMENT IS UNKNOWN.
C. ALL EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT (ERWSD) EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON NOTED AS "NOT RECORDED"
WERE PROVIDED BY SAID DISTRICT. FWS WAS UNABLE TO RECOVER AN RECORDED DOCUMENTS FOR THESE EASEMENTS.
THE VALIDITY OF THE EASEMENTS ARE UNKNOWN.
D. THE 40' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT SHOWN ON REC. NO.'S 220646 & 171103 (APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION) HAS A
DEFINED WIDTH BUT DOES NOT HAVE A DEFINED LENGTH. THE LOCATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON THE
APPROXIMATE SCALED LOCATION PER SAID DOCUMENTS WHICH MATCHES THAT SHOWN ON THE ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE
SURVEY RECORDED NOV. 29, 2005 IN BOOK 1 OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S LAND SURVEY PLATS AT PAGE 571
PREPARED BY MICHAEL J. POST PLS 30116
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
S1 - SET 18" NO.5 REBAR WITH 2" ALLOY CAP STAMPED "5.00' W.C. - PLS 38226"
F1 - FOUND NO.5 REBAR WITH 1.5" ALLOY CAP STAMPED IN PART "PLS 27598"
F2 - FOUND NO.4 REBAR WITH 1.25" RED CAP STAMPED IN PART "LS 24318"
F3 - FOUND NO. 4 REBAR - NO CAP
F4 - FOUND NO.5 REBAR - NO CAP
F5 - FOUND NO.5 REBAR WITH 2" ALLOY CAP STAMPED IN PART "PLS 27598"
MONUMENT DESCRIPTIONS
LEGEND
FEET
1 INCH = 20 FEET
4020010
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
4
5
:
1
5
A
M
35
3
TBM-2
F5
W
W
W
D
W
W
W
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598"
UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
F3
E
W
W
C
S71°3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
9
9
.
9
4
'
(
M
)
N71°4
0
'
2
2
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
3
'
(
M
)
N0
0
°
0
2
'
0
0
"
W
5
8
3
.
4
2
'
(
M
)
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
16" MAIN
10
"
M
A
I
N
10
"
M
A
I
N
E
8222'
8224'
8220'
8
2
2
0
'
B-4
ELEV: 8218.06'
SHED
TRASHENCLO
S
U
R
E S71°3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
2
5
.
5
3
'
(
M
)
S71°4
3
'
5
5
"
E
1
2
5
.
3
2
'
(
R
)
DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
DUMPSTER & REFUSE LICENSE AREA
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
CDOT PARCEL 29 REV 3
FAP I70-2(7)183
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1450
RULE AND ORDER
BK. 219 - PG. 441
JAN. 5, 1971
NORTH LIN
E
T
R
A
C
T
D
,
V
A
I
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
,
F
I
F
T
H
F
I
L
I
N
G
REC. NO. 10
2
5
3
8
N71°3
9
'
4
8
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
8
'
(
R
1
)
CONDOMINIUM PLAT
ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES
OWNER: ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES OWNERS' ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
OCT. 26, 2021 - REC. NO. 202124189
20.00'
HOLY CROSS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200634246
1/4 CORNER SEC. 8 & SEC. 5
FOUND 2.5" PIPE WITH 3.25"
BRASS BLM CAP STAMPED IN
PART " BUREAU OF LAND
MANAGEMENT - U.S.
CADASTRAL SURVEY - T5S
R80W - 1/4 S5 -S8 - 1978"
54
.
4
9
'
(
R
)
N
4
4
°
1
5
'
4
1
"
W
(
M
)
1
5
4
.
4
6
'
(
M
)
N73°42'
2
9
"
W
(
M
)
273.10'(
M
)
S2
5
°
3
4
'
0
0
"
W
(
M
)
81.
5
9
'
(
M
)
ORIGINAL 100' R.O.W. FOR U.S. HIGHWAY 6
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS STATE HIGHWAY 78)
FAP 25-A(I)
INTER
S
T
A
T
E
7
0
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
L
Y
R
.
O
.
W
.
CURB &
G
U
T
T
E
R
CURB &
G
U
T
T
E
R
TBM-1
SET MAGSPIKE IN
SIDEWALK JOINT
ELEV:8224.00'
(NAVD88)
PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825628
DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
3.1'
2.8'AREA OF CONCERN
SEE NOTE AA THIS SHEET
AREA OF CONCERN
SEE NOTE BB THIS
SHEET
40' ACCESS & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646 & 171103
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "D" SHEET 2
(SCH.B-II # 12 & 18)
10' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 102538 (SCH.B-II #12)
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "B" SHEET 2
EAST F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
40.9'
TRAVELED WAY
37
.
9
'
TR
A
V
E
L
E
D
W
A
Y
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598" UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
4.6'
CURB INLET
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 3 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 3 OF 5CONTOUR INTERVALS = 1 FOOT
FEET
1 INCH = 10 FEET
201005
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
3
3
:
3
0
A
M
35
4
505
8214.48'
SET SURVEY NAIL
507
8204.20'
SET SURVEY NAIL
TBM-3
E
130840299
8208.64'
TOP OF SLOPE
130840300
8208.50'
TOP OF SLOPE
L
E
E
F1
F1
L
L
SCO
W
EW
S
SCO
130850182
8199.24'
TOP OF SLOPE
DCOG
W
L
L
L
W
E
L
L
F1
N02°51'12"W(M)
35.44'(M)
N02°55'07"W(R)(R1)
35.54'(R)(R1)
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
4' Ø CONC. BARREL
RIM: 8206.07'
8" PVC INV IN EAST: 8187.11'
8" PVC INV IN EAST (NO FLOW): 8193.56'
8" PVC INV IN NE: 8187.11'
8" PVC INV OUT SW: 8187.07'
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
10
"
M
A
I
N
S0
0
°
0
2
'
0
0
"
E
3
2
4
.
9
7
'
(
M
)
S0
0
°
0
2
'
0
0
"
E
3
2
5
.
1
9
'
(
R
)
8215'
8210'
8
2
0
5
'
82
0
5
'
B-3
ELEV: 8214.90'
B-1
ELEV: 8206.78'
POOL
BUILDING "B"
POOL
MECH.
13121505
8214.48'
SET SURVEY NAIL
13121507
8204.20'
SET SURVEY NAIL
40' ACCESS & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646 & 171103
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "D"
(SCH.B-II # 12 & 18)
PRIVATE VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ASSOCIATION EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(PARKING, LANDSCAPING & SNOW STORAGE)
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
APPROX.
30' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "A") SHEET 2
(SCH.B-II #12 & 17)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
CONDOMINIUM MAP OF
THE WREN
OWNER: WREN ASSOCIATION
LEONARD L. McCOY, PE & PLS 2432
JAN. 9, 1975 IN BOOK 244, PAGE 32
REC. NO. 140183
AMENDED AND RESTATED TO THE CONDOMINIUM PLAT
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK
OWNER: VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
JULY 12, 2022 - REC. NO. 202211953
CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
KENNETH E. RICHARDS - PE & PLS 2183
SEPT. 5, 1978 - BOOK 274, PAGE 697 - REC. NO. 171103
AMENDED CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
JAMES L. WHEAT, RLS 12488
JUNE 9, 1981 - BOOK 324, PAGE 281 - REC. NO. 220646
10' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 102538 (SCH.B-II #12)
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "B" SHEET 2
S5
7
°
3
5
'
1
1
"
E
(
R
)
40
.
0
0
'
10.00'
N0
1
°
2
7
'
0
2
"
E
1
1
0
.
5
0
'
(
M
)
N0
1
°
2
8
'
0
7
"
E
1
1
0
.
4
5
'
(
R
)
N86°56'58"E(M)
35.53'(M)
N87°04'53"E(R)(R1)
35.53'(R)(R1)
N42
°
0
0
'
3
7
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N42
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
4
6
'
(
R
)
BA
S
I
S
O
F
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
N0
1
°
2
8
'
0
7
"
E
1
1
0
.
6
1
'
(
R
1
)
N42
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
4
'
(
R
1
)
7.
6
'
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
"
B
"
FO
O
T
P
R
I
N
T
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
8" P
V
C
DEC
K
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 4 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 4 OF 5FEET
1:120.0005
201005
CONTOUR INTERVALS = 1 FOOT
MATCH-LINE SHEET 5
MATCH-LINE SHEET 3
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
4
2
:
5
2
A
M
35
5
508
8205.56'
SET SURVEY NAIL
F1
BM 510
8199.69'
SET NAIL
512
8172.42'
SET SURVEY NAIL
BM 591
8198.73'
SET NAIL
S
W
SS
130860430
8202.87'
SPOT CONCRETE
130860431
8203.28'
SPOT CONCRETE
W
CB
F3
CBCB
E
24" CPP INVERT
SOUTH: 8182.25'
N
4
8
°
0
2
'
4
8
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
M
)
N79°47'53"
W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N79°46'00"W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
R
)
N
4
7
°
5
5
'
0
7
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
R
)
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
TTT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
10"
M
A
I
N
E
82
0
5
'
82
0
5
'
820
0
'
8195'
8190'8185'
818
0
'
8
1
7
5
'
81
7
5
'
81
8
0
'
81
8
5
'
8
1
9
0
'
8200'
819
5
'
8190'
8185'
818
0
'
B-2
ELEV: 8205.66'
BUILDING "B"
HIGH POINT: 8239.90'
BUILDING "A"HIGH POINT:8236.90'
CON
C
R
E
T
E
RAM
P
13121508
8205.56'
SET SURVEY NAIL
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
30
.
0
0
'
UNABLE TO SET
FALLS ON PART OF BOULDER WALL
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
EDGE OF WATER ON
04.14.2025
CENTER-LINE OF GORE
CREEK AS DEFINED
04.14.2025
50
.
0
0
'
TRACT A
(GORE CREEK)
VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING
OWNER: TOWN OF VAIL
E. MAX SERAFINI - PE & PLS 2568
NOVEMBER 15, 1965 - REC. NO.
102538
LAND SURVEY PLAT
TRACT A AND TRACT G, VAIL VILLAGE
FIFTH FILING
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
DEPOSITED FEB. 11, 2011 IN BOOK 1
OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S
LAND SURVEY PLAT/RIGHTS-OF-WAY
SURVEYS AT PAGE 781
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
50.00' STREAM SETBACK AS
DEFINED BY THE CENTER-LINE
OF GORE CREEK ON 04.14.2025
7.
5
'
0.
2
'
33
.
1
'
26
.
3
'
12
.
0
'
13.3'
23.4'
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
"
B
"
FO
O
T
P
R
I
N
T
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
"
A
"
FO
O
T
P
R
I
N
T
8" P
V
C
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
RIM: 8206.95'
8" PVC INV IN EAST: 8197.66'
8" PVC INV OUT WNW: 8197.63'
CONC. STAIRS
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
4' Ø CONC. BARREL
RIM: 8200.04'
8" PVC INV IN NE: 8186.38'
8" PVC INV OUT W:8186.34'
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 5 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 5 OF 5
CONTOUR INTERVALS = 1 FOOT
MATCH-LINE SHEET 4
FEET
1 INCH = 10 FEET
201005
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
3
1
:
1
9
A
M
35
6
PL
O
T
T
E
D
B
Y
:
SU
R
V
E
Y
1
O
N
:
W
e
d
n
e
s
d
a
y
,
J
u
l
y
2
1
,
2
0
2
1
A
T
:
1
:
5
8
P
M
F
I
L
E
P
A
T
H
:
P
:
\
1
6
0
0
-
1
6
9
9
\
1
6
3
7
\
d
w
g
\
1
6
3
7
-
a
d
d
t
o
p
o
o
n
l
y
.
d
w
g
EX-T
EX-TEX-U
E
EX-
U
E
E
X
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
EX
-
T
EX-
G
A
S
EX
-
G
A
S
EX-
G
A
S
EX-
U
E
EX-
W
EX-UE
EX
-
W
EX
-
W
EX-
W
E
X
-
W
EX
-
F
O
EX
-
U
E
E
X
-
U
E
EX-UE
EX-T
E
X
-
T
E
X
-
T
EX-
T
EX-T
EX-T
EX
-
S
S
EX
-
S
S
EX
-
S
S
EX-
S
S
EX
-
S
S
EX
-
S
S
EX-GAS
EX-UE
EX-T
EX-FO
EX-W
EX-SS
35
7
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25AS-01
ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
20
'
-
0
"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
NORTH / SITE PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES
SOUTH
APOLLO
PARK
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK
SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE
PARKING
GARAGE
THE WREN
AT VAIL
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES
10
'
10
'
22
'
27
'
21
'
21
'
21'
20'
20'
41'
N
0 8'16'32'
SCALE - 1/16" = 1'-0"
Revised
10.13.25
35
8
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO
EXISTING VS PROPOSED SETBACK DIAGRAM
Revised
10.13.25
20
'
-
0
"
PROPOSED BUILDING
FOOTPRINT
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK
SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE
PARKING
GARAGE
THE WREN
AT VAIL
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES
10
'
10
'
22
'
27
'
21
'
21
'
21'
20'
41'
N
0 8'16'32'
SCALE - 1/16" = 1'-0"
20'
EXISTING APOLLO PARK
FOOTPRINT
EXISTING BUILDING 2'
FROM PROPERTY LINE
1
2
'
7'-7
"
6'
-
9
"
20
'
-
4
"
15
'
3
3
'
2
6
'
SETBACK
SETBACK
07.28.25A002
35
9
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
26
27
28
29
30
32C
13 14C 15 16 17 201819 21 22
35
7
6
10
9
4 2
1
8
STAIR 2
38
25C
MECH.
39
40
41
42
43
11 12 23 24
UP
33C
34C
35C
36C
37C
RAMP
31C
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
DN
DN
DN
UP
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
EVTR
STAIR 8
EVTR
STAIR 7
EVTR
STAIR 6
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
CORRIDOR
UTILITY
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
CLOSET
BATH
WC
BATH
WC
BATH
WC
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
FOYER
FOYER
CLOSET
COATS
STAIR
STOR
COATS
DEN
FOYER
STAIR
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
POWDER
POWDER
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
VESTIBULE
34 SF
GARAGE
STORAGE
DINING
KITCHEN DINING
KITCHEN DINING
403 SF
GARAGE
442 SF
GARAGE
469 SF
GARAGE
VESTIBULE
16 SF
GARAGE
STORAGE
34 SF
VESTIBULE
STAIR
414 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
PROPOSED
AREA
WELL
COATS
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
POWDER STOR
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25
PARKING
LEVEL P2
BUILDING AREA IN SETBACK
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
AREA 1 - 380 S.F.
AREA 2 - 891 S.F.
AREA 3 - 93 S.F.
A003
Revised
10.13.25
36
0
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25
N
0 8'16'32'
SCALE - 1/16" = 1'-0"
Revised
10.13.25
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES
SOUTH
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
NORTH / SITE PARKING
APOLLO
PARK
PROPERTY LINE
ALTUS
VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES
VA
I
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
FO
R
D
P
A
R
K
THE WREN
AT VAIL
PARKING
GARAGE
BUILDING ACCESS
VEHICLE ACCESS
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
SITE ACCESS DIAGRAM
LUNAR
RESIDE
SOU
LUNAR
RESIDEN
SOUT
VA
I
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
FO
R
D
P
A
R
K
A004
36
1
DN
UP
DN
DN
UP
DN
DN
LAUNDRY
POWDER
FOYER BEDROOM
#2
BEDROOM
#1
LIVING
ROOM DINING
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC BATH #1
DEN
FOYER
BEDROOM
#1
BATH #1
MASTER
BATH
WC
CLOSET
MASTER
BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
POWDER
KITCHEN
DINING
LIVING
ROOM BEDROOM
#2
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
BATH #1POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
#1
FOYER CLOSET
KITCHEN
DINING
WC
STAIR 6
EVTR
EVTR STAIR 7
STAIR 8
EVTR
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
CLOSET
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
CLOSET
STAIR 4
STAIR 5
EVTR
UTILITY
KITCHEN
BREEZEWAY
COATS
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
STAIR
L.V.N.
UNIT G
(EHU)
1,048 N.S.F.
UPDN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV2,362 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
LOCK-OFF
2 BR / 1.5 BA
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
DEN
BATH BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LAUND BATH
LAUND
BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
2,326 N.S.F.
L.V.N.
UNIT A
3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER
BATH
FOYER
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT E
3 BR / 3.5 BA
DEN
2,513 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
L.V.N.
UNIT C
2,341 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5
BA + DEN
BEDROOM
LAUND
1,275 N.S.F.
2,267 N.S.F.
2 BR / 2 BA
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SU%0I77AL
VAIL CO A
SITE COVERAGE PLAN
ABOVE GROUND
NO ROO) OVER+AN* S
E;CEED
7<PICAL
NO7ED O7+ER:ISE
ALL *U77ERS AND DO:
S+ALL %E IN7ERNAL 7O
7<PICAL
Revised
10.13.25
LUNAR VAIL NORTHLUNAR VAIL SOUTH
APOLLO PARK
4' MIN. AREA BUFFER
GARAGE BELOW
36
2
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
26
27
28
29
30
32C
13 14C 15 16 17 201819 21 22
35
7
6
10
9
4 2
1
8
STAIR 2
38
25C
MECH.
39
40
41
42
43
11 12 23 24
UP
33C
34C
35C
36C
37C
RAMP
31C
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
DN
DN
DN
UP
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
EVTR
STAIR 8
EVTR
STAIR 7
EVTR
STAIR 6
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
CORRIDOR
UTILITY
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
CLOSET
BATH
WC
BATH
WC
BATH
WC
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
FOYER
FOYER
CLOSET
COATS
STAIR
STOR
COATS
DEN
FOYER
STAIR
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
POWDER
POWDER
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
VESTIBULE
34 SF
GARAGE
STORAGE
DINING
KITCHEN DINING
KITCHEN DINING
403 SF
GARAGE
442 SF
GARAGE
469 SF
GARAGE
VESTIBULE
16 SF
GARAGE
STORAGE
34 SF
VESTIBULE
STAIR
414 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
PROPOSED
AREA
WELL
COATS
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
POWDER STOR
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SU%0I77AL
VAIL COA
SITE COVERAGE PLAN
BELOW GROUND
PARKING GARAGE
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
APOLLO PARK
4' AREA BUFFER
Revised
10.13.25
07.28.25
36
3
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SU%0I77AL
VAIL CO A
SITE COVERAGE PLAN
ROOF PLAN
NO ROO) OVER+AN* S+ALL
E;CEED
7<PICAL UNLESS
NO7ED O7+ER:ISE
ALL *U77ERS AND DO:NSPOU7S
S+ALL %E IN7ERNAL 7O ROO)
7<PICAL
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"
9
'
4'6"
4'-6"
4'10"
5'4"
2'-6"
4'6"
4'
2'2'
4'6"
4'
3'-6"
3'
2'-6"
2'
4'
3'
1'-9
"
3'
2'
1'
4'
4'
1'
1'
2'
2'
3'
4'
1'
1'
2'
1'
1'
4'
2
'
4'
6
"
3'
4'4'
3'1'
3'6"
4'
3'4
"
4'
4'4'
3'
Revised
10.13.25
9'
4'
7'
1'
36
4
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25
SITE LIGHTING
FIXTURES 14' POLE LIGHT LOCATED ALONG DRIVEWAYS AND
FRONTAGE ROAD
WALL SCONCE 1
LOCATED AT BUILDING ENTRANCES
1
ALL FIXTURES SELECTED ARE "DARK SKY CERTIFIED" BY MANUFACTURER
WALL SCONCE 2
LOCATED AT BALCONIES
2 RECESSED FIXTURE
LOCATED AT DECKS AND GROUND LEVEL ENTRIES
PATH LIGHT FIXTURE
SEE LANDSCAPE FOR LOCATIONS
Revised
10.13.25
A013
36
5
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SU%0I77AL
VAIL CO
Revised
10.13.25
1
1
1
1
RECESSED
FIXTURES
ABOVE
1
1
1
1
SEE ENLARGED PLAN
FOR RESIDENTIAL
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
ABOVE GRADE
SE
E
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
DR
A
W
I
N
G
S
F
O
R
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
SITE LIGHTING PLAN
DRIVE WAY LIGHTINGDRIVEWAY LIGHTING
ALL FIXTURES
SELECTED ARE "DARK
SKY CERTIFIED" BY
MANUFACTURER
SEE ENLARGED PLAN
FOR RESIDENTIAL
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
ABOVE GRADE
SEE ENLARGED PLAN
FOR RESIDENTIAL
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
ABOVE GRADE
RECESSED
FIXTURES
ABOVE
A014
36
6
UPDN
UPDN
UP
DN
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25
SITE LIGHTING
LUNAR VAIL NORTH
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2 2 2 2 2
22
2
ALL FIXTURES
SELECTED ARE "DARK
SKY CERTIFIED" BY
MANUFACTURER
RECESSED
FIXTURES ABOVE
CENTERED ON
DOOR, TYP.
Revised
10.13.25
A015
36
7
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25
SITE LIGHTING
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
RECESSED
FIXTURES ABOVE
CENTERED ON
DOOR, TYP.
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
ALL FIXTURES
SELECTED ARE "DARK
SKY CERTIFIED" BY
MANUFACTURER
Revised
10.13.25
A016
36
8
DN
UP
UP
DN
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25
SITE LIGHTING
APOLLO PARK
2
2
2
2
2
ALL FIXTURES
SELECTED ARE "DARK
SKY CERTIFIED" BY
MANUFACTURER
Revised
10.13.25
A017
36
9
UPUP
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
STAIR 1
VEST.
ELEV.
S MECH.
UNEXCAVATED
20 21 23 24
MECH.
22
+0'-0"-3'-0"
26 28 29 30 31
36C
25
UP
7
9
11
17
14
12
10
813
16
15
3C
2C
4C
5C
1C
STAIR 26C
18
19
32 33 3427
SPEED RAMP
35
37C
+0'-0"
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
MECH
CLOSET
MECH
BATH
WC
BEDROOM
#1
DEN
BEDROOM
#1
BEDROOM
#2
BATH
WC
MECH
BATH
BEDROOM
#2
BATH
WC
BATH
CLOSET EVTR
STAIR 8
FOYER
258 SF
GYM
EVTR
STAIR 7
FOYER
BEDROOM
#2
CLOSET
WC
CLOSET
EVTR
BATH
CLOSET
COATS
STAIR 6
142 SF
GYM
COATS
STAIR
STAIR
STAIR
LAUNDRY
CLOSET
LAUNDRY
LAUND
259 SF
DEN
DEN
FOYER
BEDROOM
#1
WC
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
COATS
54 SF
STOR
COATS
LIVING
ROOM
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
UTILITY
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A021
PARKING
LEVEL P3
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R1
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R1
AREA PLAN
PARKING LEVEL P3
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R1
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R1
L.V.S.
TOWNHOME A
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
+GARAGE
2,150 GRFA
L.V.S.
TOWNHOME B
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN +
GARAGE
2,352 GRFA
L.V.S.
TOWNHOME C
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN +
GARAGE
2,502 GRFA
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
6
1
4
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
6
0
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
6
0
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
6
0
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
6
0
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
6
0
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
6
0
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
7
5
3
G
R
F
A
Revised
10.13.25
37
0
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
26
27
28
29
30
32C
13 14C 15 16 17 201819 21 22
35
7
6
10
9
4 2
1
8
STAIR 2
38
25C
MECH.
39
40
41
42
43
11 12 23 24
UP
33C
34C
35C
36C
37C
RAMP
31C
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
DN
DN
DN
UP
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
EVTR
STAIR 8
EVTR
STAIR 7
EVTR
STAIR 6
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
CORRIDOR
UTILITY
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
CLOSET
BATH
WC
BATH
WC
BATH
WC
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
FOYER
FOYER
CLOSET
COATS
STAIR
STOR
COATS
DEN
FOYER
STAIR
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
POWDER
POWDER
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
VESTIBULE
34 SF
GARAGE
STORAGE
DINING
KITCHEN DINING
KITCHEN DINING
403 SF
GARAGE
442 SF
GARAGE
469 SF
GARAGE
VESTIBULE
16 SF
GARAGE
STORAGE
34 SF
VESTIBULE
STAIR
414 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
PROPOSED
AREA
WELL
COATS
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
POWDER STOR
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A022
PARKING
LEVEL P2
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R2
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R2
AREA PLAN
PARKING LEVEL P2
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R2
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R2
L.V.S.
TOWNHOME A
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
+GARAGE
1,620 GRFA
L.V.S.
TOWNHOME B
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN +
GARAGE
1,788 GRFA
L.V.S.
TOWNHOME C
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN +
GARAGE
1,918 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1,229 GRFA
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
6
1
2
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
7
5
6
G
R
F
A
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1,224 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1,224 GRFA
Revised
10.13.25
37
1
STAIR 1
APOLLO PARK
TRASH HOLDING ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
VEST.
ELEV.
S MECH.
MECH.
MECH.
STAIR 2
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
DN
UP
DN
UP
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET MASTER
BATH
DEN
FOYER
STAIR 8
EVTR
BATH #1
EVTR STAIR 7
BEDROOM
#1
CLOSET
FOYER
BEDROOM
#1
STAIR 6
EVTR
BATH #1
MASTER
BATH WC
CLOSET
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
BATH #1POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
#1
FOYER
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
POWDERWC
POWDER
KITCHEN
DINING
DINING
LIVING
ROOM
PORCH
PORCH
PORCH
KITCHEN
DINING
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
EVTR
BREEZEWAY
KITCHEN
STAIR 5
STAIR 4
UTILITY
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A023
PARKING
LEVEL P1
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R3
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R3
L.V.S. UNIT A
2 BD / 2.5 BA
1,695 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT B
3 BD / 2.5 BA
1,871GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT C
3 BD / 2.5 BA + DEN
2,018 GRFA
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
5
9
2
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
7
3
0
G
R
F
A
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1,189 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1,184 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1,184 GRFA
Revised
10.13.25
37
2
TRASH
HOLDING
TRASH
ROOM
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
BUILDING
LOBBY
STAIR 1
ELEV.
REGISTRATION
OFFICE
MAIL
DELIVERY
POOL
LOBBY
POOL
MECH.POOL
STOR.
T.
DN
DN
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
2 3 4
UP
STAIR 3
UP
STAIR
BEDROOM
BATH
FOYER
1
BEDROOM
BATH
FOYER
BEDROOM BATH
FOYER
BEDROOM
BATH
FOYER
BEDROOM
LVN UNIT
2 BDR
T.
ELEC./
GEN.
ROOM
STOR.
MECH.
DN
UP
DN
UP
UP
DN
DN
UP
DN
UP
STAIR 6
EVTR
EVTR
FOYER
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
BATH #1POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
#1
FOYER CLOSET
KITCHEN
DINING
WC
FOYER
BEDROOM
#1
BATH #1
MASTER
BATH
WC
CLOSETMASTER
BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
POWDER
KITCHEN
DINING
LIVING
ROOM BEDROOM
#2
LAUNDRY
POWDER
FOYER
BEDROOM
#2
BEDROOM
#1
LIVING
ROOM
DINING
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET MASTER
BATH
WC BATH #1
DEN
BATH
BEDROOM
STAIR 7
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
EVTR
BREEZEWAY
STAIR 8
STAIR 4
STAIR 5UTILITY
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
CLOSET
BATH
CLOSET
BEDROOM
BATH
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A024
PARKING
LEVEL P0
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R4
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R4
AREA PLAN
PARKING LEVEL P0
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R4
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R4
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1,189 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1,184 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1,184 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT A
2 BD / 2.5 BA
1,860 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT B
3 BD / 2.5 BA
2,062 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT C
3 BD / 2.5 BA + DEN
2,272 GRFA
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
5
9
2
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
7
8
3
G
R
F
A
L.V.N. UNIT
1 BD / 1 BA
1,199 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
2 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
Revised
10.13.25
37
3
DN
UP
DN
DN
UP
DN
DN
LAUNDRY
POWDER
FOYER BEDROOM
#2
BEDROOM
#1
LIVING
ROOM DINING
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC BATH #1
DEN
FOYER
BEDROOM
#1
BATH #1
MASTER
BATH
WC
CLOSET
MASTER
BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
POWDER
KITCHEN
DINING
LIVING
ROOM BEDROOM
#2
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
BATH #1POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
#1
FOYER CLOSET
KITCHEN
DINING
WC
STAIR 6
EVTR
EVTR STAIR 7
STAIR 8
EVTR
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
CLOSET
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
CLOSET
STAIR 4
STAIR 5
EVTR
UTILITY
KITCHEN
BREEZEWAY
COATS
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
STAIR
L.V.N.
UNIT G
(EHU)
1,048 N.S.F.
UPDN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV2,362 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
LOCK-OFF
2 BR / 1.5 BA
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
DEN
BATH BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LAUND BATH
LAUND
BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
2,326 N.S.F.
L.V.N.
UNIT A
3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER
BATH
FOYER
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT E
3 BR / 3.5 BA
DEN
2,513 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
L.V.N.
UNIT C
2,341 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5
BA + DEN
BEDROOM
LAUND
1,275 N.S.F.
2,267 N.S.F.
2 BR / 2 BA
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A025
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R5
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R5
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R1
AREA PLAN
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R1
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R5
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R5
L.V.N. UNIT A
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,545 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT B
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,549 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT C
3 BD / 3 BA + DEN
2,412 GRFA UNIT C
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT D
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,410 GRFA
UNIT D
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT E
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
1,925 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT G
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT F
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA + DEN
1,189 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA + DEN
1,184 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA + DEN
1,184 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT A
2 BD / 2.5 BA
1,860 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT B
3 BD / 2.5 BA
2,062 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT C
3 BD / 2.5 BA + DEN
2,195 GRFA
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
5
9
2
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
B
1
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
7
9
0
G
R
F
A
Revised
10.13.25
37
4
DN
DN
UP
STAIR 4
STAIR 5
EVTR
BREEZEWAY
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
POWDER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
STAIR
UPDN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
DEN
BATH BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LAUND BATH
LAUND
BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
L.V.N.
UNIT A
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER
BATH
FOYER
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT E
L.V.N.
UNIT C
BEDROOM
LAUND
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT G
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A026
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R2
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R6
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
ROOF PLAN
AREA PLAN
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R2
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R6
L.V.N. UNIT A
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,545 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT B
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,549 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT C
3 BD / 3 BA + DEN
2,412 GRFA UNIT C
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT D
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,410 GRFA
UNIT D
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT E
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
1,925 GRFA
UNIT G
1 BD / 1 BA
787 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT F
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
Revised
10.13.25
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
C
1
B
D
/
2
B
A
6
2
3
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
C
1
B
D
/
2
B
A
6
1
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
C
1
B
D
/
2
B
A
6
1
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
C
1
B
D
/
2
B
A
6
2
0
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
C
1
B
D
/
2
B
A
6
2
0
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
C
1
B
D
/
2
B
A
6
1
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
C
1
B
D
/
2
B
A
6
1
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
C
1
1
B
D
/
1
.
5
B
A
7
6
5
G
R
F
A
37
5
STAIR
UPDN
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER
BATH
FOYERL.V.N.
UNIT E
L.V.N.
UNIT C
BEDROOM
LAUND
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
STAIR
UP
DN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
ELEVELEV
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
DEN
BATH BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LAUND BATH
LAUND
BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
L.V.N.
UNIT A
FOYER
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT G
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A027
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R3
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
ROOF PLAN
APOLLO PARK
ROOF PLAN
AREA PLAN
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R3
L.V.N. UNIT C
3 BD / 3 BA + DEN
2,412 GRFA UNIT C
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT D
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,410 GRFA
UNIT D
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT E
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
1,729 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT A
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,545 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT B
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,549 GRFA
UNIT G
1 BD / 1 BA
787 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT F
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
Revised
10.13.25
37
6
DN
ELEVELEV
STAIR
DN
STAIR
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A028
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R4
AREA PLAN
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R4
GR
E
E
N
R
O
O
F
AR
E
A
L.V.N. UNIT B
4 BD / 4.5 BA
4,602 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT A
4 BD / 4.5 BA
3,674 GRFA
GR
E
E
N
R
O
O
F
AR
E
A
ROOF
AMENITY
AREA
Revised
10.13.25
37
7
Revised
10.13.25
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A031
AERIAL VIEW LOOKING SOUTHWEST AERIAL VIEW LOOKING NORTH
AERIAL VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEASTPOOL PLAZA LOOKING WEST
378
Revised
10.13.25
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A032
VIEW FROM MOUNTAIN VIEW POOL DECK
VIEW FROM THE WREN LOWER PARKING DECK
POOL PLAZA LOOKING EAST
VIEW FROM MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES
379
Revised
10.13.25
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A033
VIEW FROM SOUTHVIEW FROM NORTHEAST
VIEW FROM NORTHWEST VIEW SOUTHEAST TOWARDS CREEK FROM APOLLO SECOND FLOOR
380
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
5'-
0
"
10
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
LVN EAVE
8273' -6"
R2-AP/LVS FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8197' -6"
R1-LVS GROUND FLOOR
8187' -0"
R3-LVS SECOND FLR (P1)
8208' -6"
PLAZA
PARKING LEVEL P0
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' -6"
LVS ROOF RIDGE
8249' -1"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8219' -0"
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES NORTH
62
'
-
1
"
19
'
-
7
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
57
'
-
0
"
PARKING LEVEL P1
PARKING LEVEL P2
PARKING LEVEL P3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES SOUTH
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 5
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
SE
T
B
A
C
K
SE
T
B
A
C
K
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
ALTUS LEVEL 1
8226' -0"
69'-9" ABOVE EXISTING
GRADE
55'-2" ABOVE EXISTING
GRADE
ROOF TOP AMENITIES
ATTIC / STRUCTURE
PATH
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
E
D
G
E
O
F
W
A
T
E
R
(+/-) 99'-0 5/8" (VARIES)COPING 8265.83'
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR (P3)
8188' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
LVN EAVE
8273' -6"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8206' -6"
R4-AP THIRD FLOOR
8215' -6"
R5-AP FOURTH FLOOR
8224' -6"
R6-AP FIFTH FLOOR
8233' -6"
R2-AP/LVS FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8197' -6"
5'-
0
"
10
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
16
'
-
6
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
PLAZA
APOLLO PARK
TIME SHARE
57
'
-
0
"
61
'
-
6
"
AP ROOF RIDGE
8250' -0"
PARKING LEVEL P0
PARKING LEVEL P1
PARKING LEVEL P2
PARKING LEVEL P3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES NORTH
LINE OF EXISTING
GRADE
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 5
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 6
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
SE
T
B
A
C
K
SE
T
B
A
C
K
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW (VMVR)
RESIDENCES BEYOND
VMVR RIDGE 8250.00'
VMVR RIDGE 8248.01'
69'-9" ABOVE
EXISTING GRADE
50'-8" ABOVE
EXISTING GRADE ROOF TOP AMENITIES
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
E
D
G
E
O
F
W
A
T
E
R
PATH
(+/-) 98'-9 3/8" (VARIES)
COPING 8265.83'
ALTUS VAIL
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN
VIE
W
THE WREN
AT VAIL
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL
SOUTH
A
P
O
L
L
O P
A
R
K
THE WREN
PARKING
2
2
1
1
3
3
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A041
2
SECTION THRU LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES NORTH
1
SITE SECTION THRU APOLLO PARK/
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES NORTH Revised
10.13.25
381
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
R2-AP/LVS FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8197' -6"
R1-LVS GROUND FLOOR
8187' -0"
R3-LVS SECOND FLR (P1)
8208' -6"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' -6"
LVS ROOF RIDGE
8249' -1"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8219' -0"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
PLAZA
PARKING LEVEL P0
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES NORTH
62
'
-
1
"
19
'
-
7
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
57
'
-
0
"
PARKING LEVEL P1
PARKING LEVEL P2
PARKING LEVEL P3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES SOUTH
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 5
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
SE
T
B
A
C
K
SE
T
B
A
C
K
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
69'-9" ABOVE EXISTING
GRADE
53'-2" ABOVE EXISTING
GRADE
ROOF TOP AMENITIES
ATTIC / STRUCTURE
PATH
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
E
D
G
E
O
F
W
A
T
E
R
(+/-) 88'-5 3/4" (VARIES)
OUTLINE OF EXISTING
APOLLO PARK
BUILDING A
15
'
-
0
"
COPING 8265.83'
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A042
3
SECTION THRU LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES NORTH1
Revised
10.13.25
ALTUS VAIL
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN
VIE
W
THE WREN
AT VAIL
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL
SOUTH
A
P
O
L
L
O P
A
R
K
THE WREN
PARKING
2
2
1
1
3
3
382
UPUP
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
STAIR 1
VEST.
ELEV.
S MECH.
UNEXCAVATED
20 21 23 24
MECH.
22
+0'-0"-3'-0"
26 28 29 30 31
36C
25
UP
7
9
11
17
14
12
10
813
16
15
3C
2C
4C
5C
1C
STAIR 26C
18
19
32 33 3427
SPEED RAMP
35
37C
+0'-0"
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
MECH
CLOSET
MECH
BATH
WC
BEDROOM
#1
DEN
BEDROOM
#1
BEDROOM
#2
BATH
WC
MECH
BATH
BEDROOM
#2
BATH
WC
BATH
CLOSET EVTR
STAIR 8
FOYER
258 SF
GYM
EVTR
STAIR 7
FOYER
BEDROOM
#2
CLOSET
WC
CLOSET
EVTR
BATH
CLOSET
COATS
STAIR 6
142 SF
GYM
COATS
STAIR
STAIR
STAIR
LAUNDRY
CLOSET
LAUNDRY
LAUND
259 SF
DEN
DEN
FOYER
BEDROOM
#1
WC
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
COATS
54 SF
STOR
COATS
LIVING
ROOM
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
UTILITY
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A051
PARKING
LEVEL P3
LEVEL P3 PARKING PLAN
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
Revised
10.13.25
38
3
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
26
27
28
29
30
32C
13 14C 15 16 17 201819 21 22
35
7
6
10
9
4 2
1
8
STAIR 2
38
25C
MECH.
39
40
41
42
43
11 12 23 24
UP
33C
34C
35C
36C
37C
RAMP
31C
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
DN
DN
DN
UP
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
EVTR
STAIR 8
EVTR
STAIR 7
EVTR
STAIR 6
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
CORRIDOR
UTILITY
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
CLOSET
BATH
WC
BATH
WC
BATH
WC
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
FOYER
FOYER
CLOSET
COATS
STAIR
STOR
COATS
DEN
FOYER
STAIR
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
POWDER
POWDER
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
VESTIBULE
34 SF
GARAGE
STORAGE
DINING
KITCHEN DINING
KITCHEN DINING
403 SF
GARAGE
442 SF
GARAGE
469 SF
GARAGE
VESTIBULE
16 SF
GARAGE
STORAGE
34 SF
VESTIBULE
STAIR
414 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
PROPOSED
AREA
WELL
COATS
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
POWDER STOR
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A052
PARKING
LEVEL P2
LEVEL P2 PARKING PLAN
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
Revised
10.13.25
38
4
STAIR 1
APOLLO PARK
TRASH HOLDING ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY10
9
4
3 2
1
VEST.
ELEV.
S MECH.
UP
RA
M
P
29
30
31
32
33
11
18C 20 21 22
23 26242517C16
ARRIVALS
27
+0'-0"
UP
13C
MECH.
6
5
8
7
15 19
28C
MECH.
STAIR 2
EV EV EV
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
14CCON
T
R
O
L
A
R
M
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
12
EV EV EV
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
DN
UP
DN
UP
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET MASTER
BATH
DEN
FOYER
STAIR 8
EVTR
BATH #1
EVTR STAIR 7
BEDROOM
#1
CLOSET
FOYER
BEDROOM
#1
STAIR 6
EVTR
BATH #1
MASTER
BATH WC
CLOSET
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
BATH #1POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
#1
FOYER
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
POWDERWC
POWDER
KITCHEN
DINING
DINING
LIVING
ROOM
PORCH
PORCH
PORCH
KITCHEN
DINING
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
EVTR
BREEZEWAY
KITCHEN
STAIR 5
STAIR 4
UTILITY
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A053
PARKING
LEVEL P1
LEVEL P1 PARKING PLAN
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
Revised
10.13.25
38
5
TRASH
HOLDING
TRASH
ROOM
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
BUILDING
LOBBY
STAIR 1
ELEV.
REGISTRATION
OFFICE
MAIL
DELIVERY
POOL
LOBBY
POOL
MECH.POOL
STOR.
T.
DN
DN
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
2 3 4
UP
STAIR 3
UP
STAIR
BEDROOM
BATH
FOYER
1
BEDROOM
BATH
FOYER
BEDROOM BATH
FOYER
BEDROOM
BATH
FOYER
BEDROOM
T.
ELEC./
GEN.
ROOM
STOR.
MECH.
LVN
UNIT H
DN
UP
DN
UP
UP
DN
DN
UP
DN
UP
STAIR 6
EVTR
EVTR
FOYER
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
BATH #1POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
#1
FOYER CLOSET
KITCHEN
DINING
WC
FOYER
BEDROOM
#1
BATH #1
MASTER
BATH
WC
CLOSETMASTER
BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
POWDER
KITCHEN
DINING
LIVING
ROOM BEDROOM
#2
LAUNDRY
POWDER
FOYER
BEDROOM
#2
BEDROOM
#1
LIVING
ROOM
DINING
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET MASTER
BATH
WC BATH #1
DEN
BATH
BEDROOM
STAIR 7
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
EVTR
BREEZEWAY
STAIR 8
STAIR 4
STAIR 5UTILITY
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
CLOSET
BATH
CLOSET
BEDROOM
BATH
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 09.22.25A054
PARKING
LEVEL P0
LEVEL P0 PARKING PLAN
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
Revised
10.13.25
38
6
L.
V
.
S
.
TO
W
N
H
O
M
E
B
UPUP
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
STAIR 1
VEST.
ELEV.
S MECH.
UNEXCAVATED
20 21 23 24
MECH.
22
+0'-0"-3'-0"
26 28 29 30 31
36C
25
UP
7
9
11
17
14
12
10
813
16
15
3C
2C
4C
5C
1C
STAIR 26C
18
19
32 33 3427
SPEED RAMP
35
37C
+0'-0"
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
MECH
CLOSET
MECH
BATH
WC
BEDROOM
#1
DEN
BEDROOM
#1
BEDROOM
#2
BATH
WC
MECH
BATH
BEDROOM
#2
BATH
WC
BATH
CLOSET EVTR
STAIR 8
FOYER
258 SF
GYM
EVTR
STAIR 7
FOYER
BEDROOM
#2
CLOSET
WC
CLOSET
EVTR
BATH
CLOSET
COATS
STAIR 6
142 SF
GYM
COATS
STAIR
STAIR
STAIR
LAUNDRY
CLOSET
LAUNDRY
LAUND
259 SF
DEN
DEN
FOYER
BEDROOM
#1
WC
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
55 SF
STOR
COATS
54 SF
STOR
COATS
LIVING
ROOM
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
UTILITY
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
A.P. UNIT
B
L.
V
.
S
.
TO
W
N
H
O
M
E
A
A.P. UNIT
B
A.P. UNIT
B
A.P. UNIT
B
A.P. UNIT
B
A.P. UNIT
B
A.P. UNIT
B
A.P. UNIT
B1
L.
V
.
S
.
TO
W
N
H
O
M
E
C
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A101
PARKING LEVEL P3
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE
SOUTH LEVEL R1
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R1FLOOR PLANS
PARKING LEVEL P3
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R1
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R1
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
7
7
'
-
5
"
81
'
-
6
1
2"
56'-101 2"23'-9"192'-41 2"
110
'
-
1
1 2"
11
5
'
-
1
1 2"
4
3
'
-
8
3
4"
22'-101 2"
16
'
-
1
1
3
4"
65'-81
2"
Revised
10.13.25
38
7
A.P.
UNIT B
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
26
27
28
29
30
32C
13 14C 15 16 17 201819 21 22
35
7
6
10
9
4 2
1
8
STAIR 2
38
25C
MECH.
39
40
41
42
43
11 12
23 24
UP
33C
34C
35C
36C
37C
RAMP
31C
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
DN
DN
DN
UP
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
EVTR
STAIR 8
EVTR
STAIR 7
EVTR
STAIR 6
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
CORRIDOR
UTILITY
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
CLOSET
BATH
WC
BATH
WC
BATH
WC
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
FOYER
FOYER
CLOSET
COATS
STAIR
STOR
COATS
DEN
FOYER
STAIR
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
POWDER
POWDER
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
VESTIBULE
34 SF
GARAGE
STORAGE
DINING
KITCHEN DINING
KITCHEN DINING
403 SF
GARAGE
442 SF
GARAGE
469 SF
GARAGE
VESTIBULE
16 SF
GARAGE
STORAGE
34 SF
VESTIBULE
STAIR
414 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
PROPOSED
AREA
WELL
COATS
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
POWDER STOR
A.P.
UNIT A
L.
V
.
S
.
TO
W
N
H
O
M
E
A
A.P.
UNIT B1
L.
V
.
S
.
TO
W
N
H
O
M
E
B
L.
V
.
S
.
TO
W
N
H
O
M
E
C
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A102
PARKING LEVEL P2
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R2
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R2
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
FLOOR PLANS
PARKING LEVEL P2
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R2
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R2
4
3
'
-
9
1
2"
7
7
'
-
5
"
131'-71
2"
74
'
-
0
1 2"
207'-4"80'-71 2"
110
'
-
1
1 2 "
11
5
'
-
1
1 2"
22'-101 2"
16
'
-
1
1
1
2"
Revised
10.13.25
38
8
STAIR 1
APOLLO PARK
TRASH HOLDING ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY10
9
4
3 2
1
VEST.
ELEV.
S MECH.
UP
RA
M
P
29
30
31
32
33
11
18C 20 21 22
23 26242517C16
ARRIVALS
27
+0'-0"
UP
13C
MECH.
6
5
8
7
15 19
28C
MECH.
STAIR 2
EV EV EV
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
14CCON
T
R
O
L
A
R
M
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
12
EV EV EV
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
DN
UP
DN
UP
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET MASTER
BATH
DEN
FOYER
STAIR 8
EVTR
BATH #1
EVTR STAIR 7
BEDROOM
#1
CLOSET
FOYER
BEDROOM
#1
STAIR 6
EVTR
BATH #1
MASTER
BATH WC
CLOSET
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
BATH #1POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
#1
FOYER
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
POWDERWC
POWDER
KITCHEN
DINING
DINING
LIVING
ROOM
PORCH
PORCH
PORCH
KITCHEN
DINING
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
EVTR
BREEZEWAY
KITCHEN
STAIR 5
STAIR 4
UTILITY
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
A.P.
UNIT A
L.
V
.
S
.
UN
I
T
A
A.P.
UNIT B
A.P.
UNIT B1
L.
V
.
S
.
UN
I
T
B
L.
V
.
S
.
UN
I
T
C
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A103
PARKING LEVEL
P1
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R3
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R3FLOOR PLANS
PARKING LEVEL P1
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R3
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R3
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
3
3
'
-
8
1
2"
131'-71
2"
74
'
-
0
1 2"
166'-0"
80'-7"
110
'
-
1
1 2"
11
5
'
-
1
1 2"
55
'
-
3
"
83'
-
4
1 2"
94
'
-
7
"
3
5
'
-
3
"
Revised
10.13.25
38
9
TRASH
HOLDING
TRASH
ROOM
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
BUILDING
LOBBY
STAIR 1
ELEV.
REGISTRATION
OFFICE
MAIL
DELIVERY
POOL
LOBBY
POOL
MECH.POOL
STOR.
T.
DN
DN
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
2 3 4
UP
STAIR 3
UP
STAIR
BEDROOM
BATH
FOYER
1
BEDROOM
BATH
FOYER
BEDROOM BATH
FOYER
BEDROOM
BATH
FOYER
BEDROOM
T.
ELEC./
GEN.
ROOM
STOR.
MECH.
LVN
UNIT H
DN
UP
DN
UP
UP
DN
DN
UP
DN
UP
STAIR 6
EVTR
EVTR
FOYER
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
BATH #1POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
#1
FOYER CLOSET
KITCHEN
DINING
WC
FOYER
BEDROOM
#1
BATH #1
MASTER
BATH
WC
CLOSETMASTER
BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
POWDER
KITCHEN
DINING
LIVING
ROOM BEDROOM
#2
LAUNDRY
POWDER
FOYER
BEDROOM
#2
BEDROOM
#1
LIVING
ROOM
DINING
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET MASTER
BATH
WC BATH #1
DEN
BATH
BEDROOM
STAIR 7
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
EVTR
BREEZEWAY
STAIR 8
STAIR 4
STAIR 5UTILITY
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
CLOSET
BATH
CLOSET
BEDROOM
BATH
A.P.
UNIT A
L.
V
.
S
.
UN
I
T
A
L.
V
.
S
.
UN
I
T
B
L.
V
.
S
.
UN
I
T
C
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT B
A.P.
UNIT B1
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A104
PARKING LEVEL P0
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R4
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R4
FLOOR PLANS
PARKING LEVEL P0
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R4
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R4
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
5
6
'
-
0
"
3
3
'
-
8
1
2"
166'-0"
80'-7"
110
'
-
1
1 2"
11
5
'
-
1
1 2"
55
'
-
3
"
94
'
-
7
"
23'-41 2"
35
'
-
6
1
2"
80'-1"4'-0"
77'
-
8
1 2"
16
'
-
4
"
9'
-
4
"
26
'
-
0
"
20
'
-
4
"
5'-8
"
Revised
10.13.25
39
0
A.P. UNIT
A
A.P. UNIT
B
A.P. UNIT
B1
L.
V
.
S
.
UN
I
T
B
DN
UP
DN
DN
UP
DN
DN
LAUNDRY
POWDER
FOYER BEDROOM
#2
BEDROOM
#1
LIVING
ROOM DINING
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC BATH #1
DEN
FOYER
BEDROOM
#1
BATH #1
MASTER
BATH
WC
CLOSET
MASTER
BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
POWDER
KITCHEN
DINING
LIVING
ROOM BEDROOM
#2
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
BATH #1POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
#1
FOYER CLOSET
KITCHEN
DINING
WC
STAIR 6
EVTR
EVTR STAIR 7
STAIR 8
EVTR
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
CLOSET
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
CLOSET
STAIR 4
STAIR 5
EVTR
UTILITY
KITCHEN
BREEZEWAY
COATS
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
CLOSET
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
STAIR
L.V.N.
UNIT G
(EHU)
UPDN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
DEN
BATH BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LAUND BATH
LAUND
BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
L.V.N.
UNIT A
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER
BATH
FOYER
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT E
L.V.N.
UNIT C
BEDROOM
LAUND
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
A.P. UNIT
A
A.P. UNIT
A
L.
V
.
S
.
UN
I
T
A
L.
V
.
S
.
UN
I
T
C
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A105
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R5
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R5
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R1
FLOOR PLANS
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R1
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R5
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R5
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
172'-0"80'-7"
110
'
-
1
1 2 "
11
5
'
-
1
1 2"
59
'
-
2
"
94
'
-
7
"
900
6
'
-
8
1 2"
5
6
'
-
0
"
80'-1"
23'-41 2"
35
'
-
6
1
2"
85'
-
5
1 2"
2
9
'
-
1
1
2"
16
'
-
2
"
16
'
-
5
"
39
'
-
5
"
Revised
10.13.25
39
1
DN
DN
UP
STAIR 4
STAIR 5
EVTR
BREEZEWAY
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
POWDER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
STAIR
UPDN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
DEN
BATH BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LAUND BATH
LAUND
BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
L.V.N.
UNIT A
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER
BATH
FOYER
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT E
L.V.N.
UNIT C
BEDROOM
LAUND
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT C
A.P.
UNIT C
A.P.
UNIT C
A.P.
UNIT C
A.P.
UNIT C
A.P.
UNIT C
A.P.
UNIT C
A.P.
UNIT C1
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A106
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R2
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R6
FLOOR PLANS
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R2
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R6
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
172'-0"
110
'
-
1
1 2 "
59
'
-
2
"
900
6
'
-
8
1 2"
5
6
'
-
0
"
16
'
-
2
"
80'-1"
23'-41 2"
35
'
-
6
1
2"
85'
-
5
1 2"
2
9
'
-
1
1
2"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
ROOF PLAN
16
'
-
5
"
39
'
-
5
"
Revised
10.13.25
39
2
STAIR
UPDN
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER
BATH
FOYERL.V.N.
UNIT E
L.V.N.
UNIT C
BEDROOM
LAUND
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
STAIR
UP
DN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
ELEVELEV
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
DEN
BATH BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LAUND BATH
LAUND
BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
L.V.N.
UNIT A
FOYER
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT G
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A107
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R3
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
ROOF PLAN
APOLLO PARK
ROOF PLAN
FLOOR PLANS
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R3
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
167'-0"
59
'
-
2
"
16
'
-
2
"
75'-1"
23'-41 2"
35
'
-
6
1
2"
2
9
'
-
1
1
2"
85'
-
5
1 2"
16
'
-
5
"
39
'
-
5
"
Revised
10.13.25
39
3
DN
ELEVELEV
STAIR
DN
STAIR
DEN
BEDROOM
BA
T
H
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATHBATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT J
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LAUND
BEDROOM
BATHBATH
STOR.
L.V.N.
UNIT K
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SU%0ITTAL
VAIL CO A
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R4
FLOOR PLANS
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R4
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
114'-6"
54
'
-
6
"
72'-1"
19'-11 2"
31
'
-
3
1
2"
43'
-
9
1 2"
16
'
-
2
"
16
'
-
5
"
39
'
-
5
"
11
'
-
8
"
Revised
10.13.25
39
4
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8281.99'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'RIDGE 8278.5'
FLAT ROOF 8275'
EAVE 8277.36'
EAVE 8273.61'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.83'
COPING 8265.83'
RIDGE 8278.5'
EAVE 8273.61'
EAVE 8273.61'
EAVE 8272.38'
EAVE 8272.38'
EAVE 8273.28'
EAVE 8272.33'EAVE 8271.33'
EAVE 8271.39'
EAVE 8272.61'
EAVE 8271.39'
EAVE 8273.95'
EAVE 8273.5'
EAVE 8272.58'
EAVE 8272.33'
EAVE 8274'
RIDGE 8278.5'
FLAT ROOF 8263.5'
FLAT ROOF 8263.5'
COPING 8255.33'
COPING 8255.33'
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
3" / 1'-0"
3" / 1'-0"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" /
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
RIDGE 8250'
RIDGE 8250'
RIDGE 8250'
PEAK 8255.01'
EAVE 8242.79'
EAVE 8245.08'
EAVE 8241.62'
COPING 8250'
RIDGE 8249.02'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
EAVE 8248.28'
EAVE 8243.5'
EAVE 8243.5'
3"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
EAVE 8243.43'
EAVE 8238.15'
EAVE 8240.95'
EAVE 8248.32'
EAVE 8248.32'
EAVE 8241'
EAVE 8248.32'
EAVE 8241.93'
EAVE 8242.83'
RIDGE 8250'
EAVE 8250.51'
EAVE 8250.51'
EAVE 8246.96'EAVE 8252.63'
EAVE 8248.42'RIDGE 8253.88'
FLAT ROOF 8249.5'
EAVE 8235.5'
EAVE 8235.5'
EAVE 8241.62'
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
3"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
3" / 1'-0"
3" / 1'-0"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" /
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
RIDGE 8250'
RIDGE 8250'
RIDGE 8250'
PEAK 8255.01'
EAVE 8242.79'
EAVE 8245.08'
EAVE 8241.62'
COPING 8250'
RIDGE 8249.02'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
EAVE 8248.28'
EAVE 8243.5'
EAVE 8243.5'
3"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
EAVE 8243.43'
EAVE 8238.15'
EAVE 8240.95'
EAVE 8248.32'
EAVE 8248.32'
EAVE 8241'
EAVE 8248.32'
EAVE 8241.93'
EAVE 8242.83'
RIDGE 8250'
EAVE 8250.51'
EAVE 8250.51'
EAVE 8246.96'EAVE 8252.63'
EAVE 8248.42'RIDGE 8253.88'
FLAT ROOF 8249.5'
EAVE 8235.5'
EAVE 8235.5'
EAVE 8241.62'
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
3"
/
1
'
-
0
"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SU%0I77AL
VAIL CO A
FLOOR PLANS
ROOF PLAN
NO ROO) OVER+AN* S+ALL
E;CEED
7<PICAL UNLESS
NO7ED O7+ER:ISE
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
Revised
10.13.25
4'4'
3'
3'4'
1'3'4'
1'
4'
6
"
2
4'
2
"
1
4'
1'
3'
1'
4'3'
2'
4'
3'6"
1'
3'
4
"
2'
4'6"
4'
3'6"
3'
2'6"
2'
2'
1'
4
"
1'
4
"
9'
4'
1'9
"
3'
1'9
"
3'
3'
4'
1'
4'
4'
1'
4'
4'
1'
4'
4'6"
9'
7'
4'6"
4'10"
5'4"
4'6"
5'4"
2'6"
4'
1'
2'
39
5
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
SE
T
B
A
C
K
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
4'-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
R3-LVS SECOND FLR (P1)
8208' - 6"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8219' - 0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' - 6"
LVS ROOF RIDGE
8249' - 1"
R2-AP/LVS SECOND FLR (P2)
8197' - 6"
R1-LVS GROUND FLOOR
8187' - 0"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
KEYPLAN EXTERIOR MATERIALS -LUNAR VAIL NORTH
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
HORIZONTAL
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
R3-LVS SECOND FLR (P1)
8208' - 6"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8219' - 0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' - 6"
LVS ROOF RIDGE
8249' - 1"
R2-AP/LVS SECOND FLR (P2)
8197' - 6"
R1-LVS GROUND FLOOR
8187' - 0"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
19
'
-
7
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
Revised
10.13.25
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A201
1/8" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION OVERALL 02
1
1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION OVERALL 01
2
396
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8206' -6"
R4-AP THIRD FLOOR
8215' -6"
R5-AP FOURTH FLOOR
8224' -6"
R6-AP FIFTH FLOOR
8233' -6"
AP EAVE
8240' -6"
R2-AP/LVS FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8197' -6"
R1-LVS GROUND FLOOR
8187' - 0"
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
7'-
0
"
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
R5-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8219' - 0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' - 6"
R2-AP/LVS FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8197' - 6"
R3-LVS SECOND FLR (P1)
8208' - 6"
LVS ROOF RIDGE
8249' - 1"
10
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
19
'
-
7
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
7'-
0
"
AP TOWER ROOF PEAK
8255' - 1"
9'-
6
"
5'-
1
"
AP ROOF RIDGE
8250' - 0"
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-AP GROUND FLR (P3)
8188' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8206' -6"
R4-AP THIRD FLOOR
8215' -6"
R5-AP FOURTH FLOOR
8224' -6"
R6-AP FIFTH FLOOR
8233' -6"
AP EAVE
8240' -6"
R2-AP/LVS FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8197' -6"
12
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
13
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
4'-
6
"
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
AP ROOF RIDGE
8250' - 0"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
7'-
0
"
9'-
6
"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
AP TOWER ROOF PEAK
8255' - 1"
9'-
6
"
5'-
1
"
AP ROOF RIDGE
8250' - 0"
KEYPLAN EXTERIOR MATERIALS -LUNAR VAIL NORTH
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
HORIZONTAL
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
1/8" = 1'-0"2 NORTH BLDG WEST ELEVATION - 02
Revised
10.13.25
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A202
1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH BLDG WEST ELEVATION - 01
2 1
397
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
4'-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE 11
'
-
0
"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
4'-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
KEYPLAN EXTERIOR MATERIALS -LUNAR VAIL NORTH
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
HORIZONTAL
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
1/8" = 1'-0"2 NORTH BLDG NORTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH BLDG SOUTH ELEVATION
Revised
10.13.25
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A203
2
1
398
KEYPLAN
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
R1-AP GROUND FLR (P3)
8188' -6"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8206' -6"
R4-AP THIRD FLOOR
8215' -6"
R5-AP FOURTH FLOOR
8224' -6"
R6-AP FIFTH FLOOR
8233' -6"
AP EAVE
8240' -6"
R2-AP/LVS FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8197' - 6"
R3-LVS SECOND FLR (P1)
8208' - 6"
R5-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8219' - 0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' - 6"
12
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
19
'
-
7
"
5'-
1
"
9'-
6
"
7'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
LVS ROOF RIDGE
8249' - 1"
AP ROOF RIDGE
8250' - 0"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE11
'
-
0
"
AP TOWER ROOF PEAK
8255' - 1"
R1-AP GROUND FLR (P3)
8188' -6"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8206' -6"
R4-AP THIRD FLOOR
8215' -6"
R5-AP FOURTH FLOOR
8224' -6"
R6-AP FIFTH FLOOR
8233' -6"
AP EAVE
8240' -6"
R2-AP/LVS FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8197' -6"
AP ROOF RIDGE
8250' - 0"
5'-
1
"
9'-
6
"
7'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
AP TOWER ROOF PEAK
8255' - 1"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8206' -6"
R4-AP THIRD FLOOR
8215' -6"
R5-AP FOURTH FLOOR
8224' -6"
R6-AP FIFTH FLOOR
8233' -6"
AP EAVE
8240' -6"
R1-LVS GROUND FLOOR
8187' -0"
R5-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8219' - 0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' - 6"
R2-AP/LVS FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8197' - 6"
19
'
-
7
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
R3-LVS SECOND FLR (P1)
8208' - 6"
LVS ROOF RIDGE
8249' - 1"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
7'-
0
"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
AP ROOF RIDGE
8250' - 0"
5'-
1
"
9'-
6
"
AP TOWER ROOF PEAK
8255' - 1"
EXTERIOR MATERIALS -LUNAR VAIL SOUTH WITH APOLLO PARK
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STUCCO 01
STUCCO 02
STUCCO 03
STUCCO 04
STUCCO 05
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
VERTICAL CABLE
RAILING
Revised
10.13.25
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A204
131/8" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH BLDG - NORTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH BLDG WEST ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"3 SOUTH BLDG SOUTH ELEVATION
2
399
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
4'-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8206' -6"
R4-AP THIRD FLOOR
8215' -6"
R5-AP FOURTH FLOOR
8224' -6"
R6-AP FIFTH FLOOR
8233' -6"
R2-AP/LVS FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8197' - 6"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR (P3)
8188' - 6"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
AP ROOF RIDGE
8250' - 0"
7'-
0
"
9'-
6
"
5'-
1
"
AP EAVE
8240' - 6"
AP TOWER ROOF PEAK
8255' - 1"
R3-LVS SECOND FLR (P1)
8208' - 6"
R5-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8219' - 0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' - 6"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
LVS ROOF RIDGE
8249' - 1"
19
'
-
7
"
EXTERIOR MATERIALS -LUNAR VAIL NORTH
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
HORIZONTAL
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
EXTERIOR MATERIALS -LUNAR VAIL SOUTH WITH APOLLO PARK
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STUCCO 01
STUCCO 02
STUCCO 03
STUCCO 04
STUCCO 05
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
VERTICAL CABLE
RAILING
Revised
10.13.25
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A241
3/16" = 1'-0"1 TYPICAL ENLARGED ELEVATION - LUNAR VAIL NORTH
3/16" = 1'-0"2 TYPICAL ENLARGED ELEVATION - APOLLO PARK
3/16" = 1'-0"3 TYPICAL ENLARGED ELEVATION - LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
06
07
08
01
030104
04
04
09
10
11
12
13
08
08
0808
11
0910
01
07 06
05
06
02
01
400
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.2528
LS1 8249.5 8207.5 8186.5 42.0 63.0
LS2 8249.0 8206.3 8208.0 42.7 41.0
LS3 8253.5 8206.5 8208.0 47.0 45.5
LS4 8249.5 8206.0 8206.0 43.5 43.5
LS5 8241.7 8202.5 8192.5 39.2 49.2
LS6 8249.0 8200.5 8186.5 48.5 62.5
LS7 8249.0 8198.6 8186.5 50.4 62.5
LS8 8249.0 8193.5 8186.5 55.5 62.5
AP1 8250.0 8198.5 8186.5 51.5 63.5
AP2 8238.5 8188.5 8188.0 50.0 50.5
AP3 8245.1 8192.0 8186.5 53.1 58.6
AP4 8243.5 8200.8 8199.2 42.7 44.3
AP5 8255.5 8205.3 8208.0 50.2 47.5
AP6 8248.4 8205.5 8208.0 42.9 40.4
AP7 8253.9 8203.5 8208.0 50.4 45.9
AP8 8250.0 8203.3 8201.1 46.7 48.9
APOLLO PARK TIMESHARE
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES SOUTH
EXISTING
GRADE
FINISH
GRADE
LN1 8273.6 8217.5 8220.0 56.1 53.6
LN2 8278.5 8219.7 8221.5 58.8 57.0
LN3 8278.5 8219.7 8219.5 58.8 59.0
LN4 8278.5 8217.5 8222.0 61.0 56.5
LN5 8278.5 8216.3 8222.0 62.2 56.5
LN6 8278.5 8211.7 8214.5 66.8 64.0
LN7 8273.3 8209.3 8211.5 64.0 61.8
LN8 8272.6 8208.3 8208.5 64.3 64.1
LN9 8265.7 8206.7 8207.0 59.0 58.7
LN10 8265.7 8206.5 8206.5 59.2 59.2
LN11 8278.5 8208.7 8208.7 69.8 69.8
LN12 8278.5 8208.9 8208.9 69.6 69.6
LN13 8265.7 8206.6 8208.0 59.1 57.7
LN14 8278.5 8209.5 8210.5 69.0 68.0
LN15 8265.7 8206.9 8218.5 58.8 47.2
LN16 8278.5 8212.0 8218.0 66.5 60.5
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES NORTH
MAXIMUM BUILDING
HEIGHT
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES AND APOLLOR PARK
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATION
ROOF RIDGE/
ROOF EAVE
ROOF RIDGE/
EAVE
ELEVATION
EXISTING
GRADE
FINISH
GRADE
LS1
AP1
AP2
LS5
LS8
AP4
AP5
AP7
LS3
LS2
AP6
LN1LN5
LN4
LN14LN13
LN11
LN9 LN7
LN8
LN6 LN3
LN2
LN12
BUILDING HEIGHT PLAN DIAGRAM
GRADING KEY
INDICATES EXISTING GRADE
INDICATES PROPOSED
GRADE
LS4
8206
LN10
AP3
LN16
0000 INDICATES POINT OF
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
BUILDING HEIGHT TABLE KEY
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A801
ES PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25
AP8
EXISTING
GRADE
FINISH
GRADE
MAXIMUM BUILDING
HEIGHT
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES AND APOLLOR PARK
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATION
ROOF RIDGE/
ROOF EAVE
ROOF RIDGE/
EAVE
ELEVATION
EXISTING
GRADE
FINISH
GRADE
LS6
LS7
LN15
ELEVATOR OVERRUN
BRISE SOLEIL
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
3" / 1'-0"
3" / 1'-0"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" /
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
RIDGE 8250'
RIDGE 8250'
RIDGE 8250'
PEAK 8255.01'
EAVE 8242.79'
EAVE 8245.08'
EAVE 8241.62'
COPING 8250'
RIDGE 8249.02'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
EAVE 8248.28'
EAVE 8243.5'
EAVE 8243.5'
3"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
EAVE 8243.43'
EAVE 8238.15'
EAVE 8240.95'
EAVE 8248.32'
EAVE 8248.32'
EAVE 8241'
EAVE 8248.32'
EAVE 8241.93'
EAVE 8242.83'
RIDGE 8250'
EAVE 8250.51'
EAVE 8250.51'
EAVE 8246.96'EAVE 8252.63'
EAVE 8248.42'RIDGE 8253.88'
FLAT ROOF 8249.5'
EAVE 8235.5'
EAVE 8235.5'
EAVE 8241.62'
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
3"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8281.99'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'RIDGE 8278.5'
FLAT ROOF 8275'
EAVE 8277.36'
EAVE 8273.61'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.83'
COPING 8265.83'
RIDGE 8278.5'
EAVE 8273.61'
EAVE 8273.61'
EAVE 8272.38'
EAVE 8272.38'
EAVE 8273.28'
EAVE 8272.33'EAVE 8271.33'
EAVE 8271.39'
EAVE 8272.61'
EAVE 8271.39'
EAVE 8273.95'
EAVE 8273.5'
EAVE 8272.58'
EAVE 8272.33'
EAVE 8274'
RIDGE 8278.5'
FLAT ROOF 8263.5'
FLAT ROOF 8263.5'
COPING 8255.33'
COPING 8255.33'
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
3" / 1'-0"
3" / 1'-0"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" /
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
RIDGE 8250'
RIDGE 8250'
RIDGE 8250'
PEAK 8255.01'
EAVE 8242.79'
EAVE 8245.08'
EAVE 8241.62'
COPING 8250'
RIDGE 8249.02'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
RIDGE 8248.32'
EAVE 8248.28'
EAVE 8243.5'
EAVE 8243.5'
3"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
EAVE 8243.43'
EAVE 8238.15'
EAVE 8240.95'
EAVE 8248.32'
EAVE 8248.32'
EAVE 8241'
EAVE 8248.32'
EAVE 8241.93'
EAVE 8242.83'
RIDGE 8250'
EAVE 8250.51'
EAVE 8250.51'
EAVE 8246.96'EAVE 8252.63'
EAVE 8248.42'RIDGE 8253.88'
FLAT ROOF 8249.5'
EAVE 8235.5'
EAVE 8235.5'
EAVE 8241.62'
4
1
/
2
"
/
1
'
-
0
"
3"
/
1
'
-
0
"
T/ WALL 8218.8'
Revised
10.13.25
40
1
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
ALTUS LEVEL 1
8226' -0"
ALTUS ROOF RIDGE
8284' -0"
ALTUS ROOF RIDGE
8284' -0"
5'-
6
"
15
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
57
'
-
0
"
58
'
-
0
"
(+
/
-
)
4
'
-
6
"
62
'
-
6
"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
R4-AP THIRD FLOOR
8215' -6"
R5-AP FOURTH FLOOR
8224' -6"
R6-AP FIFTH FLOOR
8233' -6"
AP EAVE
8242' -6"
AP ROOF RIDGE
8250' -0"
VMVR RIDGE
8250' -0"
7'-
6
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
7'-
0
"
41
'
-
6
"
VMVR LEVEL 2
8206' -0"
VMVR LEVEL 3
8216' -6"
VMVR LEVEL 4
8227' -0"
VMVR LEVEL 5
8236' -6"
13
'
-
6
"
9'-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
44
'
-
0
"
APPROX 35'-0"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A802
CONCEPTUAL HEIGHT IN CONTEXT -
LUNAR VAIL NORTH AND ALTUS
VAIL NORTH ELEVATIONS
CONCEPTUAL HEIGHT IN CONTEXT -
APOLLO PARK AND VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES NORTH
ELEVATIONS
APOLLO PARK TIMESHARE VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES ALTUS VAIL
Revised
10.13.25
402
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR (P3)
8188' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8206' -6"
R4-AP THIRD FLOOR
8215' -6"
R5-AP FOURTH FLOOR
8224' -6"
R6-AP FIFTH FLOOR
8233' -6"
R2-AP/LVS FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8197' -6"
AP ROOF RIDGE
8250' -0"
ALTUS LEVEL 1
8226' -0"
ALTUS ROOF RIDGE
8284' -0"
VMVR RIDGE
8250' -0"
16
'
-
6
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
15
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
5'-
6
"
VMVR LEVEL 1
8195' -6"
61
'
-
6
"
54
'
-
6
"
7'-
0
"
R6-AP FIFTH FLOOR
8233' -6"
R6-AP FIFTH FLOOR
8233' -6"
AP EAVE
8242' -6"
AP EAVE
8242' -6"
AP ROOF RIDGE
8250' -0"
VMVR RIDGE
8250' -0"
16
'
-
6
"
0"
7'-
6
"
9'-
0
"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A803
CONTEXTUAL SITE SECTION THRU
ALTUS VAIL AND VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES LOOKING EAST
APOLLO WEST GABLE PROFILE
AMME
11111111111141411111111111111111
MM MM
R6-AP FIFTH FLOOR
8233' -6"
R6-AP FIFTH FLOOR
8233' -6"
AP EAVE
8242' -6"
AP EAVE
8242' -6"
AP ROOF RIDGE
8250' -0"
VMVR RIDGE
8250' -0"
16
'
-
6
"
0"
7'-
6
"
9'-
0
"
APOLLO PARK
TIMESHARE BEYOND
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW
RESIDENCES OUTLINED
IN RED
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES SOUTH
BEYOND
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES NORTH
BEYOND
VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES
WEST ELEVATION OF ALTUS VAIL IN
FOREGROUND, OUTLINED IN BLUE.
FOR ELEVATION REFERENCE ONLY.
ACTUAL WIDTH MAY DIFFER FROM
SHOWN
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW WEST GABLE PROFILE AT EAST ELEVATIONAPOLLO PARK TIMESHARE GABLE PROFILE AT WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
Revised
10.13.25
403
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
A
P
O
L
L
O P
A
R
K
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
A
P
O
L
L
O P
A
R
K
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
A
P
O
L
L
O P
A
R
K
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A901
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SUMMER SOLSTICE @ 10:00 AM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SUMMER SOLSTICE @ 2:00 PM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SUMMER SOLSTICE @ 4:00 PM
SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS -SUMMER
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SUMMER
SOLSTICE @ 10:00 AM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SUMMER
SOLSTICE @ 2:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SUMMER
SOLSTICE @ 4:00 PM
404
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
A
P
O
L
L
O P
A
R
K
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
A
P
O
L
L
O P
A
R
K
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
A
P
O
L
L
O P
A
R
K
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A902
SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS -SPRING / FALL
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
EQUINOX @ 10:00 AM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
EQUINOX @ 2:00 PM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
EQUINOX @ 4:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT EQUINOX
@ 10:00 AM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT EQUINOX
@ 2:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT EQUINOX
@ 4:00 PM
Revised
10.13.25
405
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
A
P
O
L
L
O P
A
R
K
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
A
P
O
L
L
O P
A
R
K
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
A
P
O
L
L
O P
A
R
K
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIM
ESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIM
ESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIM
ESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A903
SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS -WINTER
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 10:00 AM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 2:00 PM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 4:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 10:00 AM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 2:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 4:00 PM
Revised
10.13.25
406
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25
Revised
10.13.25
40
7
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25
Revised
10.13.25
40
8
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
#
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25
Revised
10.13.25
40
9
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25
Revised
10.13.25
41
0
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25G001
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
SURVEY
V001 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 1 OF 5
V002 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 2 OF 5
V003 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 3 OF 5
V004 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 4 OF 5
V005 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 5 OF 5
CIVIL
C100 EXISTING CONDITIONS
C200 SITE AND GRADING PLAN
C300 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN
C400 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND GARAGE
A026 AREA PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R2/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R6
A027 AREA PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R3
A028 AREA PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R4
A031 SITE CONTEXT AND MASSING PERSPECTIVES
A032 SITE CONTEXT AND MASSING PERSPECTIVES
A033 SITE CONTEXT AND MASSING PERSPECTIVES
A041 SITE SECTIONS
A042 SITE SECTIONS
A051 PARKING PLAN LEVEL P3
A052 PARKING PLAN LEVEL P2
A053 PARKING PLAN LEVEL P1
A054 PARKING PLAN LEVEL P0
A101 FLOOR PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P3/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R1
A102 FLOOR PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P2/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R2
A103 FLOOR PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P1/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R3
A104 FLOOR PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P0/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R4
A105 FLOOR PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R1/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R5
A106 FLOOR PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R2/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R6
A107 FLOOR PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R3/
SOUTH BUILDINGS ROOF
A108 FLOOR PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R4
A109 NORTH BUILDING ROOF PLAN
A201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A013 SITE LIGHTING FIXTURES
A014 SITE LIGHTING PLAN
A015 SITE LIGHTING LUNAR VAIL NORTH
A016 SITE LIGHTING LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
A017 SITE LIGHTING APOLLO PARK
A021 AREA PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P3/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R1
A022 AREA PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P2/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R2
A023 AREA PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P1/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R3
A024 AREA PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P0/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R4
A025 AREA PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R1/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R5
LANDSCAPE
L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN
L101 LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN
L200 LANDSCAPE LIGHTING PLAN
L300 LANDSCAPE DETAILS / FIRE ACCESS PATH PLAN
ARCHITECTURAL
A001 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
A002 EXISTING VS PROPOSED SETBACK DIAGRAM
A003 BUILDING AREA IN SETBACK
A004 SITE ACCESS DIAGRAM
A010 SITE COVERAGE PLAN ABOVE GROUND
A011 SITE COVEREAGE PLAN BELOW GROUND
A012 SITE COVERAGE PLAN ROOF LEVEL
A202 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A203 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A204 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A241 EXTERIOR MATERIALS KEY ELEVATIONS
A801 BUILDING HEIGHT PLAN DIAGRAM
A802 BUILDING HEIGHT CONTEXT ELEVATION
DIAGRAM
A803 BUILDING HEIGHT CONTEXT ELEVATION
DIAGRAM
A901 SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS - SUMMER SOLSTICE
A902 SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS - SPRING / FALL
EQUINOXES
A903 SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS - WINTER SOLSTICE
INDEX
Revised
10.13.25
411
41
2
41
3
41
4
41
5
41
6
82
1
5
.
0
5
'
Post Office Box 2134 Eagle, Colorado 81631 p: 970.949.3286 f: 970.328.6084
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
41
7
41
8
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 1 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK: APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY: RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE:05.08.2025
VICINITY MAP
~ NOT TO SCALE ~
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 1 OF 5
A PORTION OF TRACT D, VAIL VILLAGE FIFTH FILING, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT D;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 325.19 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT D TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 70;
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 71 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 125.32 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST 110.45 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 35.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST 35.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 133.46 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF TRACT D;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT D, SOUTH 47 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST 137.0
FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT D, SOUTH 79 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 145.78 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING,
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN BUILDINGS A AND B, APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF
FILED FOR RECORD AND CONDOMINIUM DECLARATIONS FOR APOLLO PARK AT VAIL.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NO. ABC50063954-5
1. MONUMENTS AT ALL MAJOR PROPERTY CORNERS HAVE BEEN FOUND OR SET AS SHOWN HEREON.
2. THE ADDRESSES LISTED ON THE TITLE COMMITMENT IS- 442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
EAGLE COUNTY PARCEL NO'S - 2101-082-27-006 & 2101-082-46-039
3. PER FEMA MAP NUMBER: 08037C0488D HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 12/04/2007, THE SITE IS LOCATED IN ZONE X BEING DEFINED AS
AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN.
4. THE GROSS LAND AREA: 56,347 SQUARE FEET OR 1.293 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
5. VERTICAL RELIEF SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON A POST PROCESSED STATIC GNSS CONNECTION MADE TO NGS POINT SPRADDLE (PID:
AB2083) BEING A FOUND STANDARD NGS ROCK CAP IN A ROCK OUTCROPPING AS NOTED IN THE NGS DATA SHEET AND HAVING A
PUBLISHED ELEVATION PER TOWN OF VAIL GPS CONTROL 2022 MAP OF 8287.38' (NAVD88)
CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN HEREON AT 1' INTERVALS
6(a). NO ZONING REPORT OR LETTER WAS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CLIENT OR THE CLIENT’S
DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE - PER THE OFFICIAL TOWN OF VAIL ZONING MAP ADOPTED BY TOWN COUNCIL PER RESOLUTION NO. 13,
SERIES OF 2000, OCTOBER 17, 2000 - MAP UPDATED JUNE 21, 2024 - THE SUBJECT PARCEL IS ZONE HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE-FAMILY
(HDMF)
6(b). NO ZONING REPORT OR LETTER WAS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CLIENT OR THE CLIENT’S
DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE
8. SUBSTANTIAL FEATURES OBSERVED IN THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK ARE SHOWN HEREON.
9. THERE WERE THIRTY-FOUR (34) OBSERVED FULL REGULAR PARKING SPOTS, THREE (3) HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPOTS AND
THREE (3) WHAT APPEAR TO BE TRANSPORT VAN PARKING SPOTS.
11(a). NO PLANS AND/OR REPORTS WERE PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT
11(b). UTILITY LOCATES WERE PROVIDED BY ACCURATE UNDERGROUND, LTD.
13. NAMES OF ADJOINING OWNERS ACCORDING TO CURRENT TAX RECORDS ARE SHOWN HEREON.
16. DURING THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK, THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT EARTH MOVING WORK, BUILDING
CONSTRUCTION, OR BUILDING ADDITIONS OBSERVED.
17. DURING THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK, THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT STREET OR SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION
OR REPAIRS OBSERVED AND NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CONTROLLING JURISDICTION CONCERNING
PROPOSED CHANGES IN STREET RIGHT OF WAY LINES.
20. GRAVITY FED PIPE INVERT ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON.
OPTIONAL TABLE A ITEMS: (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(a), 6(b), 7(a), 7(b)(1), 7(c), 8, 9, 11(a)(b), 13, 16, 17 AND 20)
THIS CERTIFICATION DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED PERSONS OR LEGAL ENTITIES WITHOUT WRITTEN RECERTIFICATION EXPRESSLY
NAMING SUCH PERSONS OR LEGAL ENTITIES.
TO OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AND LUNAR VAIL LAND INVESTMENTS, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2021 MINIMUM
STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND
INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(a), 6(b), 8, 9, 11(a)(b), 13, 16, 17 AND 20 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELDWORK WAS COMPLETED ON MAY 5, 2025.
PURSUANT TO COLORADO REVISED STATUTE 38-51-106 (1)(D) AND COLORADO STATE BOARD OF LICENSURE FOR PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYORS RULE 1.6(B)(2), THE UNDERSIGNED FURTHER CERTIFIES THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE, IS
BASED UPON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE, AND THIS
CERTIFICATION IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
DATE OF MAP/PLAT:
05.08.2025
RY P. RUSK, PLS 38226
EMAIL: RRUSK@FORESIGHTWEST.COM
SIGNATURE AND DATE THROUGH SEAL:
(REQUIRED BY COLORADO LAW)
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION:
1. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS DISCLOSURE REQUIRED PER 13-80-105, C.R.S.:
NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS
AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN
TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.
2. STATEMENT OF LINEAL UNITS REQUIRED PER 38-51-106(1)(L), C.R.S.: LINEAL UNIT OF MEASURE USED IN THIS SURVEY IS U.S. SURVEY FOOT.
3. THE BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY REPRESENT A PROFESSIONAL OPINION BY THIS SURVEYOR AS TO WHERE THE BOUNDARY LINES
HEREBY RETRACED WERE ORIGINALLY LAID OUT ON THE GROUND AND SUBSEQUENTLY ACCEPTED BY THE AFFECTED LAND OWNERS. THE
DISCOVERY OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE MAY RESULT IN A DIFFERENT OPINION.
4. ALL COPYRIGHTS TO PUBLICATIONS BY FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING, INC. ARE RESERVED. ADDITIONALLY, ALL FIELD BOOKS, NOTES, SKETCHES
AND ELECTRONIC FILES ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE SOLE PROPERTY OF FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING, INC. IF THIS
SURVEY IS DEPOSITED WITH THE COUNTY IN COMPLIANCE WITH 38-51-107, C.R.S., FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING, INC. ACCEPTS NO LIABILITY FROM
PROPRIETARY OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION DISCLOSED TO THE PUBLIC BY THE CONTENTS HEREIN.
5. PRESERVATION OF BOUNDARY MONUMENTATION: ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES:
1) ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT (DEFINED BY 38-53-103(18), C.R.S. AS ANY LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT ESTABLISHED ON THE GROUND BY A
CADASTRAL SURVEY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND ANY MINERAL SURVEY MONUMENT ESTABLISHED BY A UNITED STATES MINERAL
SURVEYOR AND MADE A PART OF THE UNITED STATES PUBLIC LAND RECORDS), OR
2) ANY LAND SURVEY CORNER (DEFINED BY 38-53-103(6), C.R.S. AS ANY LAND SURVEY CORNER THE POSITION OF WHICH CONTROLS THE LOCATION OF
THE BOUNDARIES OF A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND), OR A RESTORATION OF ANY SUCH MONUMENT, EVEN IF SAID PERSON HAS TITLE TO THE LAND ON
WHICH SAID MONUMENT IS LOCATED, COMMITS A CLASS 2 MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY A FINE OF UP TO $1,000 AND/OR 1 YEAR IN JAIL UNLESS,
PRIOR TO SUCH REMOVAL, SAID PERSON HAS CAUSED A COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR TO ESTABLISH AT LEAST TWO WITNESS
CORNERS OR REFERENCE MARKS FOR EACH SUCH MONUMENT REMOVED AND HAS FILED OR CAUSED TO BE FILED A MONUMENT RECORD PURSUANT
TO ARTICLE 53 OF TITLE 38, C.R.S. (18-4-508, C.R.S.)
6. OIL, GAS, COAL, MINERAL, WATER, DITCH, RESERVOIR, GEOTHERMAL, AVIGATION, GRAZING OR OTHER RIGHTS, AS WELL AS DEVELOPMENT, ZONING,
LEASE, FIRE DISTRICT OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS, BOTH RECORDED AND UNRECORDED, MAY AFFECT THIS PROPERTY AND NOT BE PLOTTABLE
GRAPHICALLY HEREON.
7. THE LOCATIONS OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT TO BE CONSIDERED ALL-INCLUSIVE AND MAY BE INACCURATE.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS MAY HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM AVAILABLE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND AS-BUILT MAPS, SURFACE MARKINGS
ESTABLISHED BY INDEPENDENT LOCATORS OR UTILITY COMPANIES, OR FROM SURFACE FEATURES. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON HAVE
NOT BEEN EXPOSED BY THIS FIRM AND MAY VARY IN ACTUAL LOCATION, USAGE, MATERIAL, SIZE AND/OR EXISTENCE. THIS FIRM ACCEPTS NO
LIABILITY FOR INACCURATE WORK BY UTILITY LOCATORS. PER TITLE 9, ARTICLE 1.5, C.R.S., UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MUST BE MARKED PRIOR TO ANY
DIGGING OR DRILLING BY SUBMITTING A REQUEST TO THE UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO. CALL (811) AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE.
NO UTILITY PLANS WERE PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT IN REGARD TO TABLE A ITEM 11(A). PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES WERE PROVIDED BY ACCURATE
UNDERGROUND, LTD.
8. ANY OVERHEAD WIRES SHOWN HEREON ARE GENERALIZED LOCATIONS SHOWING THE WIRE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN UTILITY POLES AND OTHER
STRUCTURES. THE LOCATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL WIRES WERE NOT MEASURED AND THEIR REPRESENTATION ON THIS DRAWING SHOULD NOT BE RELIED
UPON WHERE ACCURATE CLEARANCE DISTANCES FROM OVERHEAD WIRES ARE REQUIRED.
9. ALL USERS OF THIS SURVEY ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT THIS SURVEY IN NO WAY CONSTITUTES A TITLE SEARCH BY FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING
INC. FOR DETERMINATION OF (A)RIGHT TO TITLE, (B)CHAIN OF TITLE/ABSTRACT, (C)THE HISTORICAL COMPATIBILITY OF ALL DESCRIPTIONS OF THIS
PROPERTY WITH ALL DESCRIPTIONS OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES, AND (D)EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD THAT
MAY IMPACT TITLE TO THIS PROPERTY. ADDITIONALLY, UNWRITTEN RIGHTS TO THIS PROPERTY MAY EXIST WHICH ARE UNKNOWN TO THIS FIRM. A
REASONABLE EFFORT WAS MADE TO RESEARCH THE RECORDS FOR THIS PROPERTY AND THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
USUAL AND CUSTOMARY STANDARD OF CARE FOR LAND SURVEYORS PRACTICING IN COLORADO.
10. TITLE POLICY REFERENCE: FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING RIGHT TO TITLE AND EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR OTHER TITLE BURDENS
AFFECTING SUCH RIGHT TO TITLE TO THIS PROPERTY, THIS SURVEY RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT ISSUED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, ORDER NO. ABC50063954-5, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 12.27.2024 AT 5:00 P.M..
11. BUILDING SETBACK NOTICE: DUE TO FREQUENT CHANGES IN AND DIFFERING INTERPRETATIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCES, THE OWNER IS URGED
TO CONTACT THE GOVERNING MUNICIPALITY(IES) FOR GUIDANCE RELATING TO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO PLANNING FUTURE
IMPROVEMENTS ON THIS PROPERTY. NO ZONING REPORT OR LETTER CITING SETBACK RESTRICTIONS WAS PROVIDED.
12. BASIS OF BEARINGS STATEMENT REQUIRED PER 38-51-106(1)(E), C.R.S.:
BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON THE EAST LINE OF THE CONDOMINIUM MAP OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION RECORDED SEPT. 5, 1978 AT REC. NO.
171103 AND AMENDED CONDOMINIUM MAP OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION RECORDED JUNE 9, 1981 AT REC. NO. 220646 BEING MONUMENTED
AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER BY A FOUND NO.4 REBAR WITH A 1.25" RED CAP STAMPED IN PART "PLS 27958" AND AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER BY A
FOUND NO.4 REBAR WITH THE LINE BETWEEN ASSUMED TO BEAR SOUTH 00° 02' 00" WEST PER SAID CONDOMINIUM MAPS.
13. VERTICAL RELIEF SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON A POST PROCESSED STATIC GNSS CONNECTION MADE TO NGS POINT SPRADDLE (PID: AB2083)
BEING A FOUND STANDARD NGS ROCK CAP IN A ROCK OUTCROPPING AS NOTED IN THE NGS DATA SHEET AND HAVING A PUBLISHED ELEVATION PER
TOWN OF VAIL GPS CONTROL 2022 MAP OF 8287.38' (NAVD88) - CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN HEREON AT 1' INTERVALS
14. MEASURED DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON REFLECT THE RESULTS OF A LEAST SQUARES ADJUSTMENT OF THE FIELD MEASUREMENTS.
15. ALL FOUND AND SET MONUMENTS ARE FAIRLY CLOSE TO GROUND SURFACE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
16. THIS SURVEY WAS HAMPERED BY SNOW COVER WHICH MAY HAVE CONCEALED FEATURES NOT SHOWN HEREON.
17. ANY MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON THAT ARE NOT TIED TO THIS SURVEY WERE NOT USED AS CONTROL CORNERS AND ARE SHOWN FOR
POSTERITY ONLY.
18. PER THE TOWN OF VAIL WATERCOURSE SETBACK MAP, GORE CREEK, WHICH IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO A 50'
SETBACK REQUIREMENT AS MEASURED FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE ESTABLISHED CREEK OR STREAM CHANNEL USING THE PRIMARY DEFINITION
OF "CHANNEL" AS SET FORTH IN WEBSTER'S II NEW RIVERSIDE UNIVERSITY DICTIONARY: "CHANNEL - A STREAM OR RIVERBED". - SAID SETBACK IS
SHOWN HEREON.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS, OR CLAIMS THEREOF, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT THAT COULD BE ASCERTAINED BY AN
INSPECTION OF THE LAND OR THAT MAY BE ASSERTED BY PERSONS IN POSSESSION OF THE LAND. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
2. EASEMENTS, LIENS OR ENCUMBRANCES, OR CLAIMS THEREOF, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
3. ANY ENCROACHMENT, ENCUMBRANCE, VIOLATION, VARIATION, OR ADVERSE CIRCUMSTANCE AFFECTING THE TITLE THAT WOULD BE
DISCLOSED BY AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE LAND SURVEY OF THE LAND AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. (STANDARD
EXCEPTION)
4. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL HERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT
SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
5. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CLAIMS OR OTHER MATTERS, IF ANY, CREATED, FIRST APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR
ATTACHING SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF BUT PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE PROPOSED INSURED ACQUIRES OF RECORD
FOR VALUE THE ESTATE OR INTEREST OR MORTGAGE THEREON COVERED BY THIS COMMITMENT. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
6. (A) TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITY THAT LEVIES TAXES
OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS; (B) PROCEEDINGS BY A PUBLIC AGENCY THAT MAY RESULT IN TAXES
OR ASSESSMENTS, OR NOTICES OF SUCH PROCEEDINGS, WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN BY THE RECORDS OF SUCH AGENCY OR BY THE PUBLIC
RECORDS. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
7. (A) UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C)
WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
8. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES, IF ANY. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
9. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE
OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 11, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475. (IMPACTS
SUBJECT PROPERTY - NOT PLOTTABLE)
10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES
PATENT RECORDED JULY 11, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475. (IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - NOT PLOTTABLE - NO DITCHES OR CANALS
WERE OBSERVED DURING THE COURSE OF THE FIELD SURVEY)
11. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GROUND LEASE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 05, 1978 IN BOOK 274 AT PAGE 693 AND ASSIGNMENT
THERETO RECORDED NOVEMBER 17, 1978 IN BOOK 278 AT PAGE 682.
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF GROUND LEASE RECORDED JUNE 27, 2006 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200616928.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - NOT A SURVEY MATTER)
12. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF VAIL VILLAGE FIFTH FILING RECORDED
NOVEMBER 12, 1966 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 102538 AND THE MAP OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1978 IN BOOK 274 AT
PAGE 697. (IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
13. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF SERVICE AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1978 IN BOOK 275 AT PAGE 599.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
14. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR
RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY,
HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE
EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER
15, 1965, IN BOOK 187 AT PAGE 353, AMENDMENT RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1984 IN BOOK 393 AT PAGE 492, AMENDMENT RECORDED JANUARY
15, 1987 IN BOOK 455 AT PAGE 933, AND AMENDMENT RECORDED AUGUST 2, 1989 IN BOOK 488 AT PAGE 378.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - NO RESTRICTIONS APPEAR TO BE SURVEY MATTERS)
15. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DECLARATION BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE,
COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY,
OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR
RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 05, 1978 IN BOOK 274 AT PAGE 696.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - APPURTENANT EASEMENTS CONTAINED WITHIN SAID DOCUMENT ARE NOT PLOTTABLE AND ARE BLANKET
IN NATURE.)
16. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF CABLE TELEVISION EASEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 08, 1997 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 611627.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - BLANKET IN NATURE OVER ALL OF TRACT 3, VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING - NOT PLOTTABLE)
17. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN EASEMENT DEED RECORDED
JUNE 19, 1980 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200646. (IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
18. 40' ACCESS EASEMENT, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, SHOWN ON INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 09, 1981, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 220646.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - APPROXIMATE SCALED LOCATION PLOTTED HEREON - NO DIMENSIONS ON PLOTTED)
19. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS
EASEMENTS AND TERMINATION OF SERVICE AGREEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 05, 2008 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200825627.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
SHEDULE B, PART II - EXCEPTIONS - OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NO. ABC50063954-5
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
4
1
:
3
3
A
M
41
9
SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING EASEMENT
ALIQUOT LINE
FOUND REBAR AND CAP AS DESCRIBED HEREON
FOUND REBAR - NO CAP AS DESCRIBED HEREON
FOUND ALIQUOT CORNER AS DESCRIBED HEREON
SET MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED HEREON
(R) - RECORD BEARING & DISTANCES PER THE APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION CONDOMINIUM PLAT RECORDED
AT REC. NO.'S 220646 & 17113
(R1) - RECORD BEARING & DISTANCE PER THE ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES CONDOMINIUM PLAT RECORDED AT REC. NO.
202124189 AND THE VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE GREEK RECORDED AT REC. NO. 202211953
(M) - FIELD MEASURED BEARING & DISTANCES
50' STREAM SETBACK
EDGE OF WATER AS OF 04.14.2025
CENTER-LINE OF GORE CREEK AS OF 04.14.2025
F1
F5
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598" UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598"
UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
F3
F1
F1
F3
F1
S7
1
°
3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
9
9
.
9
4
'
(
M
)
N7
1
°
4
0
'
2
2
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
3
'
(
M
)
N02°51'12"W(M)
35.44'(M)
N48
°
0
2
'
4
8
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
M
)
N7
9
°
4
7
'
5
3
"
W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N7
9
°
4
6
'
0
0
"
W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
R
)
N47
°
5
5
'
0
7
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
R
)
N02°55'07"W(R)(R1)
35.54'(R)(R1)
N00°02'00"W 583.42'(M)S00°02'00"E 324.97'(M)S00°02'00"E 325.19'(R)
S7
1
°
3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
2
5
.
5
3
'
(
M
)
N7
1
°
4
3
'
5
5
"
W
1
2
5
.
3
2
'
(
R
)
40' ACCESS & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646 & 171103
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "D"
(SCH.B-II # 12 & 18)
DR
I
V
E
W
A
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
RE
C
.
N
O
.
2
0
0
8
2
5
6
2
7
(S
C
H
.
B
-
I
I
#
1
9
)
DUMPSTER & REFUSE LICENSE AREA
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825628
PRIVATE VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ASSOCIATION EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(PARKING, LANDSCAPING & SNOW STORAGE)
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
APP
R
O
X
.
30'
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
REC
.
N
O
.
2
2
0
6
4
6
(SE
E
S
U
R
V
E
Y
O
R
'
S
N
O
T
E
"
A
"
)
(SC
H
.
B-II
#
1
2
&
1
7
)
ERW
S
D
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
NOT
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
D
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
THE WREN
CONDOMINIUM BUILDING "A"
CONDOMINIUM MAP OF
THE WREN
OWNER: WREN ASSOCIATION
LEONARD L. McCOY, PE & PLS 2432
JAN. 9, 1975 IN BOOK 244, PAGE 32
REC. NO. 140183
AMENDED AND RESTATED TO THE CONDOMINIUM PLAT
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK
OWNER: VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
JULY 12, 2022 - REC. NO. 202211953
CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
KENNETH E. RICHARDS - PE & PLS 2183
SEPT. 5, 1978 - BOOK 274, PAGE 697 - REC. NO. 171103
AMENDED CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
JAMES L. WHEAT, RLS 12488
JUNE 9, 1981 - BOOK 324, PAGE 281 - REC. NO. 220646
CDOT PARCEL 29 REV 3
FAP I70-2(7)183
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1450
RULE AND ORDER
BK. 219 - PG. 441
JAN. 5, 1971
F4
ACCEPTED AS
THE NE CORNER
OF THE WREN
REC. NO. 140183
NO
R
T
H
L
I
N
E
T
R
A
C
T
D
,
V
A
I
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
,
F
I
F
T
H
F
I
L
I
N
G
RE
C
.
N
O
.
1
0
2
5
3
8
10' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 102538 (SCH.B-II #12)
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "B"
S57
°
3
5
'
1
1
"
E
(
R
)
30.00'
40.00'
10.00'
N01°27'02"E 110.50'(M)
N01°28'07"E 110.45'(R)
F5
N7
1
°
3
9
'
4
8
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
8
'
(
R
1
)
CONDOMINIUM PLAT
ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES
OWNER: ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES OWNERS' ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
OCT. 26, 2021 - REC. NO. 202124189
20.00'
HOLY CROSS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200634246
N86°56'58"E(M)
35.53'(M)
N87°04'53"E(R)(R1)
35.53'(R)(R1)
N
4
2
°
0
0
'
3
7
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N
4
2
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
4
6
'
(
R
)
UNABLE TO SET
FALLS ON PART OF BOULDER WALL
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
1/4 CORNER SEC. 8 & SEC. 5
FOUND 2.5" PIPE WITH 3.25"
BRASS BLM CAP STAMPED IN
PART " BUREAU OF LAND
MANAGEMENT - U.S.
CADASTRAL SURVEY - T5S
R80W - 1/4 S5 -S8 - 1978"
BASIS OF BEARING
EDGE OF WATER ON
04.14.2025
CENTER-LINE OF GORE
CREEK AS DEFINED
04.14.2025
50.00'
TRACT A
(GORE CREEK)
VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING
OWNER: TOWN OF VAIL
E. MAX SERAFINI - PE & PLS 2568
NOVEMBER 15, 1965 - REC. NO.
102538
LAND SURVEY PLAT
TRACT A AND TRACT G, VAIL VILLAGE
FIFTH FILING
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
DEPOSITED FEB. 11, 2011 IN BOOK 1
OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S
LAND SURVEY PLAT/RIGHTS-OF-WAY
SURVEYS AT PAGE 781
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
50.00' STREAM SETBACK AS
DEFINED BY THE CENTER-LINE
OF GORE CREEK ON 04.14.2025
N48
°
0
4
'
4
8
"
W
1
9
6
.
6
1
'
(
R
1
)
N01°28'07"E 110.61'(R1)
N
4
2
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
4
'
(
R
1
)
7.5'
0.2'
33.1'
26.3'
12.0'
13
.
3
'
7.6'
23
.
4
'
54.49' (R)
BUILDING "B"
FOOTPRINT
BUILDING "A"
FOOTPRINT
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
N44°
1
5
'
4
1
"
W
(
M
)
154.
4
6
'
(
M
)
N7
3
°
4
2
'
2
9
"
W
(
M
)
27
3
.
1
0
'
(
M
)
S25°
3
4
'
0
0
"
W
(
M
)
81.5
9
'
(
M
)
ORIGINAL 100' R.O.W. FOR U.S. HIGHWAY 6
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS STATE HIGHWAY 78)
FAP 25-A(I)
IN
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
7
0
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
L
Y
R
.
O
.
W
.
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 2 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 2 OF 5
A. THE CENTER-LINE OF THE 30' UTILITY EASEMENT SHOWN ON REC. NO.'S 220646 & 171103 (APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION)
HAS A DEFINED BEARING AND WIDTH BUT DOES NOT HAVE A DEFINED LOCATION. THE LOCATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED
UPON THAT SHOWN ON THE ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY RECORDED NOV. 29, 2005 IN BOOK 1 OF THE EAGLE COUNTY
SURVEYOR'S LAND SURVEY PLATS AT PAGE 571 PREPARED BY MICHAEL J. POST PLS 30116
B. THE 10' UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE EAST LINE OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION (REC. NO.'S 220646 & 171103) BEING
THE SAME AS THE EAST LINE OF TRACT D, VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING ONLY SHOWS ON THE VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING PLAT
PER REC. NO. 102538. FWS DID NOT RECOVER ANY DOCUMENTS INDICATING THAT THIS EASEMENT WAS VACATED PER THE
CONDOMINIUM PLAT OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION. THE VALIDITY OF THIS EASEMENT IS UNKNOWN.
C. ALL EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT (ERWSD) EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON NOTED AS "NOT RECORDED"
WERE PROVIDED BY SAID DISTRICT. FWS WAS UNABLE TO RECOVER AN RECORDED DOCUMENTS FOR THESE EASEMENTS.
THE VALIDITY OF THE EASEMENTS ARE UNKNOWN.
D. THE 40' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT SHOWN ON REC. NO.'S 220646 & 171103 (APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION) HAS A
DEFINED WIDTH BUT DOES NOT HAVE A DEFINED LENGTH. THE LOCATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON THE
APPROXIMATE SCALED LOCATION PER SAID DOCUMENTS WHICH MATCHES THAT SHOWN ON THE ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE
SURVEY RECORDED NOV. 29, 2005 IN BOOK 1 OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S LAND SURVEY PLATS AT PAGE 571
PREPARED BY MICHAEL J. POST PLS 30116
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
S1 - SET 18" NO.5 REBAR WITH 2" ALLOY CAP STAMPED "5.00' W.C. - PLS 38226"
F1 - FOUND NO.5 REBAR WITH 1.5" ALLOY CAP STAMPED IN PART "PLS 27598"
F2 - FOUND NO.4 REBAR WITH 1.25" RED CAP STAMPED IN PART "LS 24318"
F3 - FOUND NO. 4 REBAR - NO CAP
F4 - FOUND NO.5 REBAR - NO CAP
F5 - FOUND NO.5 REBAR WITH 2" ALLOY CAP STAMPED IN PART "PLS 27598"
MONUMENT DESCRIPTIONS
LEGEND
FEET
1 INCH = 20 FEET
4020010
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
4
5
:
1
5
A
M
42
0
TBM-2
F5
W
W
W
D
W
W
W
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598"
UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
F3
E
W
W
C
S71°3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
9
9
.
9
4
'
(
M
)
N71°4
0
'
2
2
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
3
'
(
M
)
N0
0
°
0
2
'
0
0
"
W
5
8
3
.
4
2
'
(
M
)
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
16" MAIN
10
"
M
A
I
N
10
"
M
A
I
N
E
8222'
8224'
8220'
8
2
2
0
'
B-4
ELEV: 8218.06'
SHED
TRASHENCLO
S
U
R
E S71°3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
2
5
.
5
3
'
(
M
)
S71°4
3
'
5
5
"
E
1
2
5
.
3
2
'
(
R
)
DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
DUMPSTER & REFUSE LICENSE AREA
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
CDOT PARCEL 29 REV 3
FAP I70-2(7)183
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1450
RULE AND ORDER
BK. 219 - PG. 441
JAN. 5, 1971
NORTH LIN
E
T
R
A
C
T
D
,
V
A
I
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
,
F
I
F
T
H
F
I
L
I
N
G
REC. NO. 10
2
5
3
8
N71°3
9
'
4
8
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
8
'
(
R
1
)
CONDOMINIUM PLAT
ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES
OWNER: ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES OWNERS' ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
OCT. 26, 2021 - REC. NO. 202124189
20.00'
HOLY CROSS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200634246
1/4 CORNER SEC. 8 & SEC. 5
FOUND 2.5" PIPE WITH 3.25"
BRASS BLM CAP STAMPED IN
PART " BUREAU OF LAND
MANAGEMENT - U.S.
CADASTRAL SURVEY - T5S
R80W - 1/4 S5 -S8 - 1978"
54
.
4
9
'
(
R
)
N
4
4
°
1
5
'
4
1
"
W
(
M
)
1
5
4
.
4
6
'
(
M
)
N73°42'
2
9
"
W
(
M
)
273.10'(
M
)
S2
5
°
3
4
'
0
0
"
W
(
M
)
81.
5
9
'
(
M
)
ORIGINAL 100' R.O.W. FOR U.S. HIGHWAY 6
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS STATE HIGHWAY 78)
FAP 25-A(I)
INTER
S
T
A
T
E
7
0
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
L
Y
R
.
O
.
W
.
CURB &
G
U
T
T
E
R
CURB &
G
U
T
T
E
R
TBM-1
SET MAGSPIKE IN
SIDEWALK JOINT
ELEV:8224.00'
(NAVD88)
PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825628
DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
3.1'
2.8'AREA OF CONCERN
SEE NOTE AA THIS SHEET
AREA OF CONCERN
SEE NOTE BB THIS
SHEET
40' ACCESS & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646 & 171103
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "D" SHEET 2
(SCH.B-II # 12 & 18)
10' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 102538 (SCH.B-II #12)
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "B" SHEET 2
EAST F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
40.9'
TRAVELED WAY
37
.
9
'
TR
A
V
E
L
E
D
W
A
Y
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598" UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
4.6'
CURB INLET
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 3 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 3 OF 5CONTOUR INTERVALS = 1 FOOT
FEET
1 INCH = 10 FEET
201005
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
3
4
:
1
0
A
M
42
1
505
8214.48'
SET SURVEY NAIL
507
8204.20'
SET SURVEY NAIL
TBM-3
E
130840299
8208.64'
TOP OF SLOPE
130840300
8208.50'
TOP OF SLOPE
L
E
E
F1
F1
L
L
SCO
W
EW
S
SCO
130850182
8199.24'
TOP OF SLOPE
DCOG
W
L
L
L
W
E
L
L
F1
N02°51'12"W(M)
35.44'(M)
N02°55'07"W(R)(R1)
35.54'(R)(R1)
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
4' Ø CONC. BARREL
RIM: 8206.07'
8" PVC INV IN EAST: 8187.11'
8" PVC INV IN EAST (NO FLOW): 8193.56'
8" PVC INV IN NE: 8187.11'
8" PVC INV OUT SW: 8187.07'
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
10
"
M
A
I
N
S0
0
°
0
2
'
0
0
"
E
3
2
4
.
9
7
'
(
M
)
S0
0
°
0
2
'
0
0
"
E
3
2
5
.
1
9
'
(
R
)
8215'
8210'
8
2
0
5
'
82
0
5
'
B-3
ELEV: 8214.90'
B-1
ELEV: 8206.78'
POOL
BUILDING "B"
POOL
MECH.
13121505
8214.48'
SET SURVEY NAIL
13121507
8204.20'
SET SURVEY NAIL
40' ACCESS & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646 & 171103
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "D"
(SCH.B-II # 12 & 18)
PRIVATE VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ASSOCIATION EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(PARKING, LANDSCAPING & SNOW STORAGE)
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
APPROX.
30' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "A") SHEET 2
(SCH.B-II #12 & 17)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
CONDOMINIUM MAP OF
THE WREN
OWNER: WREN ASSOCIATION
LEONARD L. McCOY, PE & PLS 2432
JAN. 9, 1975 IN BOOK 244, PAGE 32
REC. NO. 140183
AMENDED AND RESTATED TO THE CONDOMINIUM PLAT
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK
OWNER: VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
JULY 12, 2022 - REC. NO. 202211953
CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
KENNETH E. RICHARDS - PE & PLS 2183
SEPT. 5, 1978 - BOOK 274, PAGE 697 - REC. NO. 171103
AMENDED CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
JAMES L. WHEAT, RLS 12488
JUNE 9, 1981 - BOOK 324, PAGE 281 - REC. NO. 220646
10' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 102538 (SCH.B-II #12)
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "B" SHEET 2
S5
7
°
3
5
'
1
1
"
E
(
R
)
40
.
0
0
'
10.00'
N0
1
°
2
7
'
0
2
"
E
1
1
0
.
5
0
'
(
M
)
N0
1
°
2
8
'
0
7
"
E
1
1
0
.
4
5
'
(
R
)
N86°56'58"E(M)
35.53'(M)
N87°04'53"E(R)(R1)
35.53'(R)(R1)
N42
°
0
0
'
3
7
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N42
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
4
6
'
(
R
)
BA
S
I
S
O
F
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
N0
1
°
2
8
'
0
7
"
E
1
1
0
.
6
1
'
(
R
1
)
N42
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
4
'
(
R
1
)
7.
6
'
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
"
B
"
FO
O
T
P
R
I
N
T
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
8" P
V
C
DEC
K
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 4 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 4 OF 5FEET
1:120.0005
201005
CONTOUR INTERVALS = 1 FOOT
MATCH-LINE SHEET 5
MATCH-LINE SHEET 3
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
4
2
:
2
1
A
M
42
2
508
8205.56'
SET SURVEY NAIL
F1
BM 510
8199.69'
SET NAIL
512
8172.42'
SET SURVEY NAIL
BM 591
8198.73'
SET NAIL
S
W
SS
130860430
8202.87'
SPOT CONCRETE
130860431
8203.28'
SPOT CONCRETE
W
CB
F3
CBCB
E
24" CPP INVERT
SOUTH: 8182.25'
N
4
8
°
0
2
'
4
8
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
M
)
N79°47'53"
W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N79°46'00"W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
R
)
N
4
7
°
5
5
'
0
7
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
R
)
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
TTT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
10"
M
A
I
N
E
82
0
5
'
82
0
5
'
820
0
'
8195'
8190'8185'
818
0
'
8
1
7
5
'
81
7
5
'
81
8
0
'
81
8
5
'
8
1
9
0
'
8200'
819
5
'
8190'
8185'
818
0
'
B-2
ELEV: 8205.66'
BUILDING "B"
HIGH POINT: 8239.90'
BUILDING "A"HIGH POINT:8236.90'
CON
C
R
E
T
E
RAM
P
13121508
8205.56'
SET SURVEY NAIL
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
30
.
0
0
'
UNABLE TO SET
FALLS ON PART OF BOULDER WALL
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
EDGE OF WATER ON
04.14.2025
CENTER-LINE OF GORE
CREEK AS DEFINED
04.14.2025
50
.
0
0
'
TRACT A
(GORE CREEK)
VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING
OWNER: TOWN OF VAIL
E. MAX SERAFINI - PE & PLS 2568
NOVEMBER 15, 1965 - REC. NO.
102538
LAND SURVEY PLAT
TRACT A AND TRACT G, VAIL VILLAGE
FIFTH FILING
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
DEPOSITED FEB. 11, 2011 IN BOOK 1
OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S
LAND SURVEY PLAT/RIGHTS-OF-WAY
SURVEYS AT PAGE 781
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
50.00' STREAM SETBACK AS
DEFINED BY THE CENTER-LINE
OF GORE CREEK ON 04.14.2025
7.
5
'
0.
2
'
33
.
1
'
26
.
3
'
12
.
0
'
13.3'
23.4'
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
"
B
"
FO
O
T
P
R
I
N
T
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
"
A
"
FO
O
T
P
R
I
N
T
8" P
V
C
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
RIM: 8206.95'
8" PVC INV IN EAST: 8197.66'
8" PVC INV OUT WNW: 8197.63'
CONC. STAIRS
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
4' Ø CONC. BARREL
RIM: 8200.04'
8" PVC INV IN NE: 8186.38'
8" PVC INV OUT W:8186.34'
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 5 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 5 OF 5
CONTOUR INTERVALS = 1 FOOT
MATCH-LINE SHEET 4
FEET
1 INCH = 10 FEET
201005
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
3
2
:
1
3
A
M
42
3
Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes
Monday, September 8, 2025
1:00 PM
Vail Town Council Chambers
Present: Robyn Smith
Craig H Lintner Jr
John Rediker
Brad Hagedorn
David N Tucker
William A Jensen
Robert N Lipnick
1. Virtual Link
Register to attend the Planning and Environmental Commission meeting. Once registered,
you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining this webinar.
2. Call to Order
3. Main Agenda
3.1 A request for review of Major Exterior Alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7H -7, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for redevelopment of the Concert
Hall Plaza Condominiums, located at 616 W. Lionshead Circle, Lot 1, Vail Lionshead
Filing 4. (PEC25-0023)
Planner: Heather Knight
Applicant Name: Beaver Capital I, LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group and Pierce
Austin Architects
Time: 90 min.
PEC25-0023 CHP Major Exterior Alteration Staff Memo-090825.pdf
Attachment A. Vicinity Map - Concert Hall Plaza Condos.pdf
Attachment B. Applicant CHP Memo for 9-8-25 rev.pdf
Attachment C. CHP Plan Set.pdf
Attachment D. CHP Renderings.pdf
Attachment E. Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Updated
12292017.pdf Attachment F. CHP Easement and Plat.pdf Attachment G.
Lionshead_loadingdelivery.pdf
Attachment H. Concert Hall Plaza Public Comment - UPDATED.pdf
Timestamp 00:15
Item 3.1 & 3.2 heard concurrently.
Planner Knight gives a presentation. The applicant wants feedback on a proposal to put the public
easement through the building in a similar configuration to today. Knight recaps the site plan and
proposed development. She talks about the proposed design deviations, and the conversation on
the primary retail pedestrian frontage. She walks through the elevations and stepbacks. They are
now meeting the (Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan) LRMP criteria.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
1
424
Rediker asks about the portal connection in the LRMP. What does staff feel about the connection?
Knight, that could be decided at DRB, but it also plays a role at this meeting. Its role is to be as direct
as possible and it’s clear that this is an important connection to the core.
Rediker, asks about design deviations on the south elevation.
Knight, it meets the definitions in the LRMP, in terms of further articulation that gets more into
the architectural details which continue to be developed with this project.
Jensen asks about width of the easement.
Knight, Planning & Public Works looked at this and other examples in Town and the 12’ was
the minimum they felt comfortable with.
Tucker, where it narrows to 8’ is also where back of house operations will occur?
Knight, 8’ was the minimum existing, 12’ would be consistent with the new proposal.
The applicant is represented by Allison Kent with Mauriello Planning Group and Kit Austin and
Reed Kildow with Pierce Austin Architects.
Kent gives a presentation. They would like to focus on the proposed relocation of the pedestrian
path. She talks about their outreach efforts, there is a lot of misinformation out there. Kent walks
through the changes since the last meeting.
Rediker and Kent discuss proposed trash access.
Kent walks through renderings of the proposed pedestrian portal.
Austin talks about architectural changes on the elevations.
Smith, can you explain the outdoor dining areas on the south side?
Austin, patios can go halfway into setback but not intended as dining necessarily.
Smith, being able to open those in the summertime seems like a good experience. Are we giving up
on the idea that a future redevelopment of Montaneros could extend a pedestrian retail frontage
through there?
Austin, there’s no way it would be linked up with the Concert Hall because of the grading
difference there.
Knight, we can’t base this design on a future development that hasn’t been discussed, it would
be difficult because of the grading.
Smith asks Public Works about the proposal.
Chad Salli, TOV Project Engineer, says this provides the most direct route of the available options.
Having them follow the same traffic pattern is the best option, they are required to have parking
onsite and much of the frontage is covered by the bus stop.
Rediker, could people accessing the garage use the bus lane?
Salli, it happens today. There are only limited spaces in the proposed parking and it’s not for public use.
They don’t anticipate high frequency trips in this area.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
2
425
Smith, are there audible and visible alarms needed with this garage?
Salli, we haven’t seen those details yet. Austin, we might have lights mounted right next door, shouldn’t
require any alarms on the exterior surfaces. Smith recommends the most acoustically pleasing option.
Rediker, are you stepping back at 60’ on all facades? Austin confirms.
Hagedorn asks if the public can use the garage for commercial spaces.
Austin says no, it is for residents and commercial owners.
Rediker and Austin discuss the proposed lighting in the walkway.
Rediker asks about the landscape plan.
Austin says the landscaping has been increased with this new easement configuration. Rediker
is concerned about landscaping and plantings on the north side with the lack of light.
Austin, it will have more robust shrubs, we are limited with trees with fire restrictions. It will be
hardy, perennial landscaping.
Rediker says the landscaping needs to look good with the portal. Would like to hear more about
the landscaping ideas in the future.
Rediker, what about the concept of an inviting portal? What will be visually engaging at the entrances?
Austin, we need to accentuate what is there, make sure it is safe at night. It’s nice to be able to step
into the building and get out of the wind. There will be signage to identify it, the commercial space will
also activate it.
Rediker asks about snow storage.
Austin, it is located in the north and west of the site, it doesn’t drain onto neighboring properties.
Jensen, if the south patios were deeper is that better for that elevation? The connection to Montaneros
is important.
Tucker asks about the hood system for restaurant space?
Austin, it is routed internally and vertically through the building, we’ve been planning to
accommodate that.
Tucker, how would hood system be accessed for service?
Austin, we probably would have some rooftop equipment, it will be accounted for in the plans, it is
much higher than the street level.
Tucker, what about sand/oil separators?
Kildow, the indoor garage will have it.
Kent, the whole garage level will be fire sprinkled per the Fire Department. The engineers are working
on the discharge pipes.
Kent talks about the existing and proposed commercial spaces.
Rediker asks for public comment.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
3
426
Bill Nutkins, on behalf of the Landmark HOA. They still have some concerns over the massing and
monolithic appearance of the building. The applicants have done a great job improving all sides of the
building but the main part of the building facing Landmark is lackluster in stepping and mass
mitigation. This will put the west end of Landmark in shade for much of the day. We urge the PEC to
encourage the applicants to look at how they can mitigate the mass and the impact on Landmark. At
60’ they step back 9’ and 14’ feet, they’re taking their dimension from a bump out. Wants to make
sure the north side looks as good as the effort on the other sides.
Ellen Grady, owner in Landmark and on board of directors. Wants to point out to PEC that having the
walkway through the building is a better access point. CHP is proposing to reduce the width of that
walkway and this won’t help chokepoints. The TOV is considering developing West Lionshead, that
will add to pedestrian traffic through this portal. We have one shot at getting a really nice entrance to
Lionshead from the west. How can this be grander and give the experience for residents and guests
that we want people to have, not sure this achieves that.
Mark Kobelan, owner at Landmark and on board. Happy to see something get done with CHP, agrees
with the idea of putting the walkway through the building. There’s an exhibit for the easement that
describes the walkway, in the description it is 15’ wide. They should look at what it would take to make
it 15’ wide. The covered bridge is 16’ wide. On the north side, the foundation is within a foot of the
property line, what will landscaping be on top off, will it restrict it?
Dan Wolf, attorney for Landmark association. The easement that exists is created by three recorded
documents: the plat, easement, and condo map. All depict an easement that is 16.5’ feet wide, that
should be the guiding width here. That will increase the functionality and benefit for the public. The LRMP
says that access should be as direct as possible, we don’t believe the current configuration is as direct as
possible, with the two 90 degree angles. There is also the issue of the height of the easement, the
documents don’t have a height limit but 11’ isn’t tall enough. Proposal is a step in the right direction but
less than the current easement and doesn’t enhance pedestrian access to Lionshead.
Kevin Fitzpatrick, resident of Landmark. Echoes Ellen’s comments about grand and wonderful
entrance. A long subway like path doesn’t meet that, there is an opportunity to make this something
special. These folks are still asking for a variance, we are also still concerned about the roof
equipment that was discussed. We want to make sure those are depicted in the next presentation.
Susan Catalano, 20-year resident of Lionshead. Concern is that West Lionshead will be developed, the
smooth access between that and Lionshead will not be enhanced by this building. It may meet height
requirements, but on the east end it will be approximate 100’ tall, this will deter traffic. Agrees with Kevin
& Ellen. Their first floor is the second floor of Montaneros, they will dwarf Montaneros, it will actually
be as tall as the Landmark building, doesn’t see how that will invite people in.
No further comment, public comment closed. Rediker asks for commissioner comment.
Hagedorn, this is a major step in the right direction. Stresses for public that the LRMP has specific
standards, it is the master plan that defines height, mass etc.. Appreciates added step on the east to
create relief, even including projections they are meeting 12’ stepbacks with maybe one exception.
Kent, we intend at the next meeting to have fully described sheets showing compliance or any
requested deviations.
Hagedorn, in favor of 0’ setback on north underground. The easement going through building is a
much better path. There is conflicting public comment with concern about the width of easement and
loss of commercial, we are at a fairly happy medium right now. Hagedorn understands the concern
about loss of commercial space, it’s not one of our criteria, but there may be opportunities to enhance
it. We’re losing this because this building got away with zero parking in the past, it needs parking by
code. It still needs more definition around the portals to show people this is the way.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
4
427
Jensen, agrees with Hagedorn. Compliments applicants on changes on three of the sides, the
north could still use more work to look less like a flat wall. Agrees commercial space is important
but if you guys could add 5% more, maybe by the entrances to make it more prominent. Supportive
of massing, bus stop & access, east portal should line up on the stairs.
Lipnick, this is a better version than before. Improving the CHP will go a long way. Comfortable with
the mass of building, in favor of covered easement, agrees with wider borders.
Smith, appreciates the expanded commercial on southeast. Supports expanded patios on the south
and east for more outdoor dining. Doesn’t want to lose more commercial but should expand corridor
where possible. Council will decide this ultimately, but you have done a good job. This is a tiny lot and
is required to maintain the pedestrian corridor, meet the setbacks, pedestrian transition with bus stop,
needs trash and parking, there are a lot of challenges. You’re meeting expectations and doing it
efficiently and this will be a huge improvement. This is not overdevelopment, it meets all the
requirements with few or no deviations. A lot of the written comments have been about business
displacement, that is sad, but presently we don’t have any policy tools to prevent or mitigate that.
Hope there is a way for those businesses to come back, but this is meeting all the criteria and you’re
going above and beyond for the public benefit.
Tucker, great presentation, this is moving in the right direction. Interested to see how the commercial
that returns will interplay with the residential units and pedestrian walkway. Appreciates the better path
for garage entrance, echoes other commissioners about massing being in a better position.
Lintner, same thoughts as others. Expanded commercial is a plus, corridor revisions are a huge
improvement, agrees with Smith about south patio expansion. We cant weigh in on displacement,
but something he personally thinks of that holds valuable businesses in the community. Sees a lot
of vast improvement here.
Rediker, this new portal option is better than previously. The way the property works, you need those
90-degree angles without compromising commercial space. This design is more inviting than
anticipated, however 5.8.4 says we want something that is better than what’s there now. Should we
explore widening and heightening that portal if there’s a way to do that? Wants to make sure that if
there are any deviations next time that they are called out. This building is a big change for the area
and there are negative impacts, understands the comments from Landmark. There will be more
shading on the bus stop and loading area. Doesn’t have a problem with the underground variance for
walls that are currently there, that is common in Town. This will be a change, but property owners are
allowed to develop within the guidelines and code. It’s unfortunate about the loss of existing
businesses; there’s nothing in our plans or guidelines that allows for us to consider this. Would like to
see more interest in the west and north facades, you guys have done a lot of improvement on these.
Brad Hagedorn made a motion to Continue to the meeting on September 22nd; Robert N
Lipnick seconded the motion Passed (7 - 0).
3.2 A request for review of a variance from Section 12-7H -10 Setbacks, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Title 12 Chapter 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a below
grade parking garage located within the required ten foot (10’) setback, located at
616 W. Lionshead Circle, Lot 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 4. (PEC25-0023)
Please see item 3.5 for attachments
Planner: Heather Knight
Applicant Name: Beaver Capital I, LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group and Pierce
Austin Architects
Time: 5 min.
PEC25-0022 CHP Variance Staff Memo-090825.pdf
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
5
428
Item heard concurrently with 3.1
Brad Hagedorn made a motion to Continue to the meeting on September 22nd; Robert N
Lipnick seconded the motion Passed (7 - 0).
3.3 A request for review of Major Exterior Alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7H -7,
Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for redevelopment of
a multiple-family residential dwelling units (Lionshead Circle Residences), located at
534 East Lionshead Circle/A Resubdivision of a part of Lots 1, 2, 3 and Tract E Block
1, Vail/Lionshead Filing No. 1. (PEC25-0018)
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Telemark Ventures LLC, and Vail Property Group LLC, Represented by
Ruther Associates Time: 60 mins
PEC25-0018, 0020 Staff Memo.pdf
Attachment A. Vicinity Map.pdf
Attachment B. Applicant Narrative 8-25-25.pdf
Attachment C. Traffic Report 8-11-25.pdf
Attachment D. PEC25-0018 Plans Part1.pdf
Attachment D. PEC25-0018 Plans Part2.pdf
Attachment D. PEC25-0018 Plans Part3.pdf
Attachment D. PEC25-0018 Plans Part4.pdf
Attachment E. PEC25-0018 Documents.pdf
Attachment F. 7-9-18 PEC Minutes.pdf
Attachment G. PEC25-0018 Public Comment 9-8-25.pdf
Attachment H. Lionshead Circle Residences Employee Housing
Plan.pdf Attachment I. 7-11-25 Narrative to the DRB.pdf Attachment J.
8-25-25 PEC Minutes.pdf
Attachment K. Lionshead Circle Public Comment.pdf
Timestamp: 02:09
Item 3.3 & 3.4 heard concurrently.
Planner Roy gives a presentation. He recaps the proposal and the three associated applications. The
Timber Ridge credit program the applicant is proposing to use for their Housing Plan was re-opened at
the last Town Council meeting via resolution no. 41. He walks through the site plans and elevations.
Rediker asks about the requested design deviations.
Roy says these were recommended by the DRB at a conceptual review. He gives an overview of
the requested deviations, including the 60’ eave requirements in a couple places.
The applicant is represented by George Ruther with Ruther Associates and Charlie Starr with
Oz Architecture. Starr walks through exhibits of the requested deviations.
Rediker and Starr discuss the north elevation and the proposed belly bands and material changes
to break up a couple of the starker areas.
Ruther presents on the applicant’s Housing Plan and the memorandum they provided.
Lipnick, 100% of the housing units will be in Timber Ridge?
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
6
429
Ruther confirms, in compliance with the credit program.
Smith confirms that the updated language for condition 3 is prior to the issuance of a building permit
rather than certificate of occupancy. Smith asks for the total housing square footage requirement for
the housing requirement.
Roy says condition 12 is related to this, the square footage will be verified by staff.
Smith states proposed conditional language for number 3.
Tucker thanks applicant for explanation of the housing credits.
Rediker asks for public comment.
Braden List, General Manager at Vantage Point in Vail. We agree the parking lot is an eyesore, but
replacing it with something of this size is not what the neighbors want to see. The new view will just be
this building, the mass and scale outlies everything else. One of the biggest concerns is the sun/shade
report, the entirety of south facing lawn landscaping of Vantage Point will always be in the shade. The
proximity of the two buildings is crazy; it takes away from the feel of the area. The second concern is
that we have not seen a plan for Vail 21 or Lifthouse in terms of parking and access. CHP did a
redesign based on neighbor's concerns, is there a way to communicate the same issues? The building
is monolithic, the north side lacks interest. Longtime owners in Vail are losing their views and looking
at the flat side of the new building. The pathways that are provided should be as direct as possible.
The previous designs had better pedestrian access. The applicant has not shown how a single
driveway will properly allow for the flow of traffic. Not understanding how tearing down an old
commercial space gives a credit for employee housing.
Kit Austin, with Pierce Austin Architects. They will be working with Lionshead Arcade on a
redevelopment. They have concerns with parking and trash logistics, not looking to oppose or delay
the project, but request more venues to work through the logistical items and look forward to working
with them.
JR Rowell, frequent visitor of Vail. They have a discontinuous roofline which accents the elements
you were objecting to. Is there anything in the code that says the windows need to be smaller?
No further comment, public comment closed. Rediker asks for commissioner comment.
Smith, said out how it met criteria in the previous meeting. Affording housing credit to long vacant
uses, PEC can’t change legislation, but it does raise a good question that is worth exploring at a future
date. Council has made clear this credit program is accepted for onsite and offsite mitigation, meets
Exception 2 for offsite mitigation. Denying the project would be contrary to the comprehensive plan,
which does include Res. 41 of 2025.
Tucker, the material changes on the north side seem insufficient but if developer is willing to increase the
dynamism and possibly enlarging windows it should address that. All in all, appreciates presentation.
Lintner, agrees the proposal is now meeting the housing mitigation requirements. Thinks it’s
unfortunate that is the direction the Town is going, it’s an irreplaceable loss of housing onsite, but do
agree it’s being met. We’re here to take objective stance on criteria.
Lipnick, agrees that housing mitigation complies, that was the big outstanding question.
Jensen, the LRMP has been out there for a long time. It’s interesting to see people move forward to take
advantage of those opportunities, recognizes it’s a change but probably one that is overdue for the area.
Worries for the long term success of the community without some redevelopment in Lionshead. Does think
it’s important for applicants to work with adjacent owners that are contemplating redevelopment to
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
7
430
see if there are some synergies by the time construction starts.
Hagedorn, a lot of his previous comments still stand, you have addressed many. The deviations are
minor to the scope as mentioned in the LRMP. We have specific geometric and dimensional
standards and those are abided by currently. We haven’t seen a construction management plan,
that is not within our purview but agrees with Jensen about being good neighbors that will make this
area better. For housing plan, does not like the Timber Ridge credit program, it’s a political and
financial reaction and one- offs are not good policy. That said, it is the directive of Council and we
need to abide by that. He was at that point last time, that has not changed.
Rediker, there was public concern about trash access, wants to give applicants a chance to respond.
Ruther, we have a site circulation plan that addresses many of these questions. We have been
meeting regularly with adjacent properties to talk about what happens during construction. We had
received a list of concerns from Lifthouse, and we are beginning to address many of those issues. For
loading and delivery, the Town was thoughtful with the Arrabelle facilities, because it can address
many of those issues. There will be changes with redevelopment, but we’re continuing to coordinate.
Starr walks through the circulation details on the site plan.
Rediker, regarding housing, we clarified that issue today and Council’s intent. Has a problem with the
program and its use as expressed by others but it is allowable so personal opinion is not important,
the housing plan is acceptable. Has concern about the north side, the stair and elevator towers and
the lack of interest. Looking at criteria 2 for deviations there are problems. The deviations on the front
side work, it’s the north and potentially the east that are the problem.
Robyn Smith made a motion to Approve with the conditions on pg. 19 & 20 of the staff memo and
the findings on pg. 20, including the amended condition 3:
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the project, the applicant shall provide documentation of
the transfer and application of the Timber Ridge deed-restricted employee housing credits, for 100% of the
required employee housing mitigation, in the amount of 8,534 sf, less any credit applied from the existing
LionsPride building as verified in Condition 12, in a form approved by the Town Attorney for the required
housing mitigation, or return to the Planning Commission to amend the housing plan
; Brad Hagedorn seconded the motion Passed (6 - 1).
Voting For: Brad Hagedorn, William A Jensen, David N Tucker, Craig H Lintner Jr, Robyn Smith,
Robert N Lipnick
Voting Against: John Rediker
3.4 A request for review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-7H-5
Conditional Uses; Generally (On All Levels of a Building or Outside of a Building), Vail
Town Code, in accordance with Title 12, Chapter 16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail
Town Code, to allow for to allow for the operation of a public or private parking lot,
located at Located at 534 East Lionshead Circle/ A Resubdivision of a part of Lots 1, 2,
3 and Tract E Block 1, Vail/Lionshead Filing No. 1. (PEC25-0020) Please see item 3.2 for memo and attachments
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Telemark Ventures LLC, and Vail Property Group LLC, Represented by
Ruther Associates
Time: 5 min
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
8
431
Item heard concurrently with 3.3
Robyn Smith made a motion to Approve with the conditions and findings on pg. 21 of the staff
memo; Robert N Lipnick seconded the motion Passed (7 - 0).
3.5 A request for approval of a minor subdivision, pursuant to Section 13- 4, Minor
Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to vacate the common lot line between Lot 1A and Lot
2A, Block 1, Vail/Lionshead Filing No. 1, and amending existing plat notes located at
534 East Lionshead Circle/A Resubdivision of a part of Lots 1, 2, 3 and Tract E Block 1,
Vail/Lionshead Filing No. 1. (PEC25-0019)
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Telemark Ventures LLC, and Vail Property Group LLC, Represented by
Ruther Associates Time: 30 min
PEC25-0019 Minor Sub Staff Memo.pdf
Attachment A. Final Plat.pdf
Attachment B. Vail Lionshead Filing 1 Block 1 Lot 1 through 3 and Tract E Correction Plat.pdf
Timestamp: 03.24:30
Planner Roy gives a presentation. He talks about the history of the plat note, it was added as a
condition of a previous PEC application based on public comment, not staff recommendation or code.
George Ruther references their memo; they comply with the criteria as noted in the document. It
improves the ability to redevelop the site and comply with the Town’s regulations on the property.
It previously created conflicts with the building code.
Rediker asks for public comment. No public comment.
Rediker asks for commissioner comments.
Smith concurs with the criteria being met per staff memo.
Hagedorn finds it meets criteria in staff memo.
Lipnick finds it meets the criteria per the staff memo.
Rediker finds the criteria are met.
Brad Hagedorn made a motion to Approve with the conditions and findings on pg. 15 of the staff
memo; Robert N Lipnick seconded the motion Passed (7 - 0).
3.6 A request for recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 3-2 -6A,
Function, Vail Town Code, to amend Conceptual Building Height Plan of the Vail
Village Master Plan. (PEC25-0025)
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC represented by Ruther Associates LLC
Time: 30 min
PEC25-0025 - Staff Memo.pdf
Attachment A. Applicant's Narrative.pdf
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
9
432
Timestamp: 03:33
3.6, 3.7 & 3.8 are heard concurrently.
Planner Roy gives a presentation. He talks about the three associated applications. A final
decision is not requested today and the items are recommended to be continued to a
future meeting.
Roy talks about the request for a new SDD. He walks through the proposed height
and elevations. Roy walks through the development standards on the site.
Rediker asks about the timeshare units aspect.
Roy, they are relocating the existing timeshare units into a single structure. As these are
timeshare units, they do not have specific criteria or conditions with the conditional use.
Smith, is there 40% slope on the southern half of the site?
Roy believes so. Smith asks about limiting disturbance on that. Roy says Title 14 says
natural grade should be respected, he is not sure if that is natural grade.
Smith would be interested in how this would be interpreted for the future meetings.
The applicant is represented by George Ruther with Ruther Associates. Ruther gives a
presentation. He talks about the history of the site and the current proposal. Ruther talks about
recommendations from the master plan. Ruther talks about other SDDs in the core area that have
heights higher than those recommended by the conceptual building height plan.
Ruther talks about the site and grading plan. He discusses the general floor plans. They are
requesting deviations from the underlying zoning on the site but have made some noticeable
changes to the building – no longer requesting 1’ setback on west side of the property.
Hagedorn asks about the height in relation to the previous work session.
Ruther talks about the site constraints impacting the height. He talks about how the
Town measures height using existing and proposed grade.
Rediker asks about sun shading on the frontage road.
Ruther, there will be an impact, but the building casts no more shadow on the south
frontage road than the other buildings currently located in the vicinity.
Smith, Hagedorn, and Jensen have to leave meeting, say they will review public
comment from these items.
Rediker asks about bed count.
Ruther 73 units, 36 of those are timeshares.
Rediker, the master plan seems to contemplate stepping down from the Frontage road to
the creek. Are you meeting this?
Ruther walks through the sections and how the proposal steps from north to south.
Rediker asks about the building heights on the Wren property.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
10
433
Roy says he was not able to find those before this meeting. It is a four-story building.
Rediker, right now Mountain View and Altus are in one SDD?
Roy confirms, their development standards are shared.
Rediker, they come in underneath what would be allowed in HDM zoning for site?
Roy believes so, these numbers were taken from a previous staff report but will doublecheck
to verify. When Altus was added, they did the SDD to vary some of those numbers. Roy
says they can further clarify at a future meeting.
Rediker, Altus wouldn’t have been built had not an SDD been created for the deviations?
Roy confirms.
Lintner appreciates the presentation. Tucker agrees.
Rediker asks for public comment.
Todd Mosser, General Manager of the Wren representing the HOA. We have a few concerns
with the project as proposed, namely around the massing. There is no stepdown on the north
tower north to south, which will impact us the most. The sun/shade analysis from winter will
put our pool into significant shade, would also like to see the spring and fall. Request 3D
modeling to see what these buildings will be in relation to the neighborhood. Concerned
about the lack of landscaping and buffering between the two properties, there will be a
driveway on the property line. We’re concerned about the headlights of cars exiting the
garage with no buffer. What will the exterior lighting on the property look like, how will it
impact neighbors? Their large retaining wall is near the property line, there are major safety
concerns and how is that constructed that close to the property line?
Howard Willard is an owner at Vail Mountain View. Thanks neighbors who have provided
public comment. The proposal asks for extreme variances that are offensive to the neighbors.
It is too much site coverage, fails to meet the landscaping requirements. They are requesting
a height a full story taller than VMVR, when that property redeveloped around 2009 it met the
standard. For the Lunar Vail north building, their diagrams were misleading. There was a fight
in approving the 70’ height for Altus, the developer prevailed because they put 15 EHUs in
that building, giving comfort they could go to a level higher. They are 20’ higher along the
creek side. They are also exceeding the GRFA standards. They’ve ignored the precedent right
next door that was considered by the Town. This would be a massively tall building for people
driving through Town and ruin the creek- side path to Ford Park. We’ve heard how complex
the site is, that’s because they’re requesting to overdevelop the site. The development team is
not going to abandon this unless it’s rejected by somebody with authority. There is a chart
comparing neighboring properties, would like to see that in the next packet.
Laura Willard and Michael Dardeck, owners in VMVR. Dardeck agrees with Howard Willard,
the requests beyond the requirements are unbelievable. In support of this being
redeveloped, but the zoning requirements are so homeowners can preserve their value
because they know what will be around them. We all know Lionshead is an urban area, and
Vail Village is a village. This is a floor or two too high. They have landscaping problems
because there is too much cement.
Gretchen Brigden lives in Vail, office owner in the Wren. Even though the Wren hasn’t been
redeveloped it wasn’t included on the zoning chart. This project will tower over the Wren.
Serious concerns with the retaining wall and dig out. We need to focus on whether lowering
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
11
434
that makes sense from an erosion and engineering perspective.
Jacqueline Grosser, owner in Altus. What will the increased traffic in this area look like,
concerned about that. The parking lot above ground is only currently happening with
public parking.
Ronald Mooney is a resident of Vail Trails East and is on the HOA board. Thanks PEC for
sticking through the long meeting, agrees with Howard Willard. The whole creek, the south
end hasn’t been talked about and how it will impact the residences along the creek.
Looking forward to more discussion and hopes that all these comments will be heard by the
commission.
JR Rowell is an owner at the Wren. There are a lot of balconies on the Wren, will be sad to
look at this building. Don’t think it’s a very attractive building. Very concerned about digging
along the top of the bank. The whole project is a case of overreach. Is anyone else amazed at
the number of SDDs and variances in this area? Sometimes it’s important to be tough and do
logical things and hope the commission will come up with something logical here.
Kevin Mushlin speaking for Ivan (inaudible), an owner in Altus. Coming to Vail over 10 years, he
fell in love with the village and Town. This development will take away many of the views, strongly
object to this development, agrees with Willard. The traffic increase is also a concern. Estimates a
30 to 40% loss on the value of the property, wants to state opposition and ask PEC to reject and
allow developer to come up with something that will make neighbors happy.
Paul Mooradian is a fractional owner at the Wren. Commends PEC for your work and the length of
your meetings. The Wren is nicely taken care of. In your packet on pg. 754, there is reference to
the plan, not intended to be regulatory but guiding. It seems like the SDD developments
somewhat are exploiting or circumventing the underlying zoning code. Believes in development
rights but believes they must stay within reasonable boundaries and the deviations are
outrageous. In the SDD there is an opportunity for community benefits. There may be an
opportunity to talk about pedestrian connections that would allow public to circulate through the
site, that would be a better public benefit than the art. Aesthetically these buildings are not very
pleasing. There are some view corridors that should be considered. Greg Roy was awesome, was
responsive despite the large packet, commends the staff and commission.
Harrison Hoss assists with operations and management, comments on behalf of Apollo Park.
We have been and continue to be engaged in conversations, optimistic that a mutually
agreeable design can be reached. The remainder of the properties develop is up to Lunar
Vail, we’re optimistic about finding a solution for everyone involved.
Caryn Clayman is an owner in Mountain View, also sent a letter. They mentioned there will
be lockoffs and timeshares, this is starting to sound like this is a rental project. Is there going
to be onsite management? Everything that is being proposed is counter to why I purchased
at Mountain View residences. Doesn’t see a 20’ setback anywhere in this project, the
landscaping is insufficient. We might be on the outskirts of the village, Betty Ford gardens is
a world-renowned garden, this would diminish the value of the whole community. Don’t mind
it getting redeveloped, but it should be done thoughtfully. Doesn’t want to live in New York
City, that is the way we’re going.
Mike Rootberg an owner at VMVR. Supports Dardek and Clayman, development is
entitled but this is way too big, too many variances, not acceptable for the area.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
12
435
Justin Astley is Vice President of HOA at Altus and owner. Appreciates everyone’s hard work.
Not in opposition redevelopment, but this is an overreach. The traffic is already bad, the building
will encroach everywhere, the landscaping is lacking. There are certain aspects of being able to
see the mountain from the highway, a big building along the road will block that.
No further public comment, public comment closed.
Tucker, would like to see a better relationship of the new development to the walking path
along the river. Echoes some public comment, it’s a gigantic project, doesn’t necessarily
agree that it does fit in. Understands the desire with the SDD, but it’s a very large building that
will further encroach along the lines the master plan sets out. Concerns about hillside stability,
what steps can be taken to ensure we have engineering to back up those decisions.
Lipnick, not comfortable with the bulk and mass, not comfortable with shading analysis,
not comfortable with the height.
Rediker, the first application for the plan amendment, we need to try to stick to the building
height plan as much as we can. When there’s a suggestion to increase the stories, just on a
portion, if the people drafting the master plan knew that the zoning would go away, did they
imagine a redevelopment that took up as much of the lot as possible? Doesn’t think that was
contemplated for this neighborhood. Starting to feel like we’re redeveloping like its
Lionshead, in an area that is not Lionshead. There are large facades to the building, not a lot
of stepbacks. Concerned about building height, lack of stepping back, stepping back from the
frontage road and down towards the creek. Wants to see better landscaping, adequate
buffering between building, there are 20’ setbacks with one exception. As someone
mentioned, we want to see a lighting plan. The concerns about the retaining wall, want to
understand what is going on there. The major takeaways is he has a hard time envisioning
buildings this size on the lot. Doesn’t know what the PEC was thinking when they approved
Altus, now the neighbors want to do something similar. Would like to see plans working on
height, and respectful of site coverage and GRFA.
Lintner agrees with Rediker, in the interest of time will leave it at that. There is a lot of
reliance being put on past decisions that were made that were not necessarily the best ones.
Ruther appreciates the time. They will be back on the 22 nd, they will continue to work with
the plans and the comments they have received. A little concerned, the reason they spent
time is because they continue to work through the challenges. The changes they made to the
setback maybe were overlooked, that was a substantial amount of work. When you consider
the parking, and all of the requirements. When Altus and VMVR were built, the Tyrolean said
similar things, we have heard similar comments from neighbors for past developments in the
neighborhood. We’ll continue to work with the neighbors and take the comments that you
shared. We’ve been waiting to get the benefit of all commissioner comments.
David N Tucker made a motion to Continue to the meeting on September 22nd; Robert N
Lipnick seconded the motion Passed (4 - 0).
3.7 A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of a
new Special Development District, pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development
Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a multi-family project,
located at 442 South Frontage Road East/ Vail Village Filing 5, Tract D. (PEC25-0026)
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
13
436
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC represented by Ruther Associates LLC
Time: 60 min
PEC25-0026, 0024 Staff Memo.pdf
Attachment A. Applicant's Narrative.pdf
Attachment B. Lunar Park Traffic Assessment 7-17-25.pdf
Attachment C. Lunar Park - EIR - 7-23-25.pdf
Attachment D. PEC25-0026 Documents.pdf
Attachment E. PEC25-0026 Plans Part1.pdf
Attachment E. PEC25-0026 Plans Part2.pdf
Attachment E. PEC25-0026 Plans Part3.pdf
Attachment F. Lunar Park Public Comment - UPDATED.pdf
Item heard concurrently with 3.6
David N Tucker made a motion to Continue to the meeting on September 22nd; Robert N
Lipnick seconded the motion Passed (4 - 0).
3.8 A request for review of a Conditional Use Permit amendment, pursuant to Section 12-6H-
3 Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, in accordance with Title 12, Chapter 16, Conditional
Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow for timeshare units, located at Located at 442
South Frontage Road East/ Vail Village Filing 5, Tract D. (PEC25-0024)
See item 3.7 for staff report and attachments
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC represented by Ruther Associates LLC
Time: 5 min
Item heard concurrently with 3.6
David N Tucker made a motion to Continue to the meeting on September 22nd; Robert N
Lipnick seconded the motion Passed (4 - 0).
4. Approval of Minutes
4.1 PEC Results 08-25-25
PEC_Results_8-25-25.pdf
John Rediker made a motion to Approve ; David N Tucker seconded the motion Passed (3 - 0).
5. Information Update
Timestamp: 00:00
Housing Director Jason Dietz gives an update on the Timber Ridge credit program. The original
program went from May 12th through August 11th. There are now a couple changes; the
pricing will remain the same with one exception – a down payment assistance program.
Credits won’t have to be applied for whole unit increments. The credits will need to be secured
prior to building permit rather than C/O.
Dietz and Jensen discuss the down payment assistance program.
Rediker, at the council meeting did council discuss 12-24-6, methods of mitigation? Dietz,
that specific section was not discussed.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
14
437
Dietz, the intent of the program was to allow for on-site mitigation at Timber Ridge.
Rediker, 2027 Housing plan talks about the Town goals of new units, if onsite mitigation is
moved to an existing development how are we achieving those goals?
Dietz, that is the direction we have received, I can pass on that feedback.
Lintner, it’s a big loss and flaw of what is being proposed here, there will be pending new
developments that will utilize that option, those buildings will be there a long time and are a
lost opportunity to have in-town housing.
Dietz, this only applies to the original 86,000 sf.
Rediker, this is allowing people to mitigate completely for a financial goal. Dietz, that is
the direction from Town Council and Town Attorney.
Dietz, 19,112 sf has been currently put into contract.
Smith, in watching the council meeting, they were clear that the correct application of the
exception criteria would allow for this program to satisfy those exceptions. The reasons why
were discussed, a variety of housing types taking many forms is a housing goal. With onsite
requirements we have been producing small basement dorms, this would add additional
dispersion and variety to the housing types. 86,400 sf is what existed in the program
(development) originally, so selling credits on this is intended to ensure that portion of the
redevelopment remains 100% deed restricted and available. This is a different form of trying to
seize opportunity and make sure the project remains 100% deed restricted for people that can
take advantage of it.
Hagedorn asks that the timing is now building permit rather than at C/O? Dietz confirms.
6. Adjournment
Robert N Lipnick made a motion to Adjourn ; seconded the motion Passed (4 - 0).
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2025
15
438
Present:
Absent:
Robyn Smith
Brad Hagedorn
David N Tucker
William A Jensen
Robert N Lipnick
Craig H Lintner Jr
John Rediker
1. Virtual Link
Register to attend the Planning and Environmental Commission meeting. Once registered,
you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining this webinar.
2. Call to Order
3. Main Agenda
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Douglas Walker, represented by Eagle River Water and Sanitation District
Time: 30 Min
3.1
A request for review of a variance from Section 14-10-9(E), Height Limitations, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Title 12 Chapter 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, for retaining walls in
excess of six feet in height, located at 765 Potato Patch Drive, Lot 33, Vail Potato Patch
Filing 1. (PEC25-0027)
Planner Roy gives a presentation. He walks through the site plan
Dan Duerr and Jeff Schnieder with ERWSD are representing the applicant. They give a presentation.
No questions from PEC.
Hagedorn asks for public comment. No public comment.
Tucker, the solution is as elegant as it can be, and the adjoining property owner has signed off. It’s a
necessary piece of infrastructure.
Lipnick, the review criteria are met.
Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes
Monday, September 22, 2025
1:00 PM
Vail Town Council Chambers
PEC25-0027 Staff Memo.pdf
Attachment A. Vicinity Map.pdf
Attachment B. Applicant's Narrative.pdf
Attachment C. PEC25-0027 Plans.pdf
Attachment D. PEC25-0027 Documents.pdf
1
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 22, 2025 439
Jensen, supportive of variance, it is an extraordinary circumstance. It supports the entire community and
there is not a viable alternative.
Smith agrees, extraordinary circumstances.
Hagedorn, these are exceptional circumstances, this infrastructure plays a critical role, any alternative
solution would have an adverse impact on vegetation.
Planner: Heather Knight
Applicant Name: Beaver Capital I, LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group and Pierce Austin
Architects
Time: 90 min.
3.2 A request for review of Major Exterior Alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7H-7, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for redevelopment of the Concert
Hall Plaza Condominiums, located at 616 W. Lionshead Circle, Lot 1, Vail Lionshead Filing
4. (PEC25-0023)
Timestamp: 00:12
Item heard concurrently with 3.3.
Planner Knight gives a presentation. She talks about the Lionshead portal on the west side. She walks
through the elevations. The only variance is for underground parking, there are no design deviations.
Smith asks about bathroom access, based on public comment. Knight says the applicant can address
the floor plan.
Hagedorn, based on LMU-1 is there a requirement for first floor commercial?
Knight, there are permitted uses, but no requirements for specific uses.
The applicant is represented by Dominic Mauriello with Mauriello Planning Group and Reed Kildow and
Kit Austin with Pierce Austin Architects. Mauriello gives a presentation. He talks about community
outreach, overview of changes, and criteria for review. Mauriello talks about the 1992 condo map and the
history of that. He talks about the stepbacks on the north elevation.
Smith and Mauriello discuss the floor plans and bathrooms.
Jensen, there are a lot of positives, but it’s important to have a restroom that is convenient.
Austin, it’s a key point where a restroom is needed, each space will need a restroom. The way it’s setup
now works well, we’ll create a plan to maintain them.
Robert N Lipnick made a motion to Approve with the condition on pg. 8 and the findings on pg. 9 of the
staff memo; Robyn Smith seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0).
PEC25-0023 CHP Major Exterior Alteration Staff Memo-Final.pdf
Attachment A. Vicinity Map - Concert Hall Plaza Condos.pdf
Attachment B. Applicant Narrative & Title.pdf
Attachment C. Architectural Plan Set.pdf
Attachment D. Elevations and renderings.pdf
Attachment E. Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Updated 12292017.pdf
Attachment F. CHP_1992_Plat.pdf
Attachment G. Lionshead_loadingdelivery.pdf
Attachment H. Concert Hall Plaza Public Comment 9-22-2025.pdf
2
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 22, 2025 440
Hagedorn, there might be efficiency to be gained to not have to burden small restroom spaces, if that is a
possibility.
Smith asks about potential patios on south and east that were discussed last time.
Mauriello, we could come back and ask in the future if we need it, wanted to keep the ask to a minimum.
Tucker asks about mechanical equipment, didn’t see venting in the plans. Is there access to the roof for
servicing that equipment?
Mauriello, we haven’t had full MEP review yet. Austin talks about some of the proposed venting. We
have considered it, we have a path to move forward, should be of minimal impact.
Tucker, is there a consideration of enlarging commercial space in the new build?
Mauriello, we’ve maximized those spaces, not an opportunity to make them bigger.
Hagedorn asks for public comment.
Samantha Sunshine, has had a business in CHP for the last 10 years. Wants to speak about how
valuable the current one is. Sees people overflowing at Little Diner, waiting by the bus, it’s an important
hub for connection. Concerned that the proposed smaller portal will limit CHP as a gathering point. The
Little Diner is a huge asset for Vail, a beloved institution. Nine luxury condos and high prices spaces are
not what Vail needs. She grew up here, lives here, local businesses have power here and keep visitors
coming back. Development is inevitable but it can be done in a different way. We should support
relocation or compensation for long-standing businesses here. Strength is not in more residential units,
but in people and businesses that make it special.
No further public comment.
Smith, it meets all the criteria for MEA and variance. It is consistent with the LRMP, and comprehensive
plan. The degree of design deviation is proportionate to the extent of the improvements proposed. We’ve
encouraged as much commercial as we can. Doesn’t believe there are design deviations, but it is a
portal and acting as a standalone structure portal which is above and beyond what was anticipated in the
master plan. There is mitigation of development impacts, improving streetscape, making donations to
public art. The displacement of businesses and losses of commercial space is an unfortunate impact of
this development; we don’t have policy tools to prevent or mitigate the displacement of these businesses.
There’s nothing we can do to require them to bring back these businesses, we can hope so. The
variance is warranted. The PEC asked the applicant to submit for expanded outdoor dining on the south
side. It would be better if it was in the patio not the easement. Hope you can incorporate one public
bathroom.
Jensen, agrees with Smith. There are some beautiful things in Lionshead and things that have lived a life
from the 70s. The project in the 70s was rushed because of the growth. Likes the vibrancy and warmth of
this project, portals are critical to the long-term success of Lionshead. Strongly believes that one
restroom is the right answer so developer should consider that. Wants to speak emotionally about
current tenants, believe people make the difference, worries our community becomes too brand driven
and loses some of its character. Loss of commercial space is troubling but understandable. Suggests
developer thinks long and hard about current tenants, talks about experience with his businesses in
Tahoe. Doesn’t want to see Little Diner go either but asks developer to really look and see if there’s a
solution they can participate that maintains some of that spirit. The PEC looks at things against the list of
rules. We have to rely to some extent on the developer of this project to understand the significance that
the businesses bring to our community.
Lipnick, the review criteria are met. Agrees more commercial space would be good, one restroom is
adequate. Can Town Council loan money to the businesses? Redevelopment is necessary but
3
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 22, 2025 441
concerned about putting out local businesses if not necessary.
Tucker, agrees with fellows. Emotionally it is difficult, it’s good that more people now have an interest in
development in Vail. Seconds Smith’s call for more outdoor seating, the right thing for public benefit
would be a shared restroom to maximize space for seats. The variance is something that has been
approved before. Appreciates the applicant taking time to answer our questions.
Hagedorn, this building was originally built with no parking. This redevelopment requires that it is parked,
it’s the reason why below grade commercial is no longer feasible, driving some of the loss of commercial
space. The PEC has pushed hard for commercial on the ground floor, appreciates applicant doing that to
the extent possible. This body implements policy, it does not set policy, we have no current provision for
compensating businesses for displacement. Would hate for public outreach to die here, these opinions
are something Council could consider from a policy standpoint. The PEC doesn’t have the leeway to
implement those policies; the Town Council does. This proposal has made a lot of strides, the portal has
come a long way, the easement is wider on average. You’ll go through DRB agrees that one restroom is
the way to go. The one deviation is outweighed by the greater stepbacks on other facades. Below grade
parking is not visible and is consistent with past decisions, some of the neighboring building have similar
variances. The on-grade access is an improvement.
Please see item 3.5 for attachments
Planner: Heather Knight
Applicant Name: Beaver Capital I, LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group and Pierce Austin
Architects
Time: 5 min.
3.3 A request for review of a variance from Section 12-7H-10 Setbacks, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Title 12 Chapter 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a below grade
parking garage located within the required ten foot (10’) setback, located at 616 W.
Lionshead Circle, Lot 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 4. (PEC25-0022)
Item 3.2 & 3.3 are heard concurrently.
Planner: Greg Roy
3.4 A request for recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 3-2-6A,
Function, Vail Town Code, to amend Conceptual Building Height Plan of the Vail Village
Master Plan. (PEC25-0025)
This item will be heard concurrently with item 3.5.
Applicant Name: Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC represented by Ruther Associates LLC
Time: 5 min
Timestamp: 01:27
Item 3.4 heard concurrently with Item 3.5 and Item 3.6.
Roy gives a presentation. There is a request to be tabled at the conclusion of the items.
William A Jensen made a motion to Approve with the conditions and findings on pg. 12 & 13 of the staff
memo; Robyn Smith seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0).
PEC25-0022 CHP Variance Staff Memo-092225.pdf
Robyn Smith made a motion to Approve with the conditions on pg. 8 & findings on pg. 9; William A
Jensen seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0).
4
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 22, 2025 442
The applicant is represented by George Ruther with Ruther Associates. Ruther gives a presentation.
Hagedorn wants to understand how we got here. A lot of the arguments for an SDD are tying into what
has been done before and what might be done, therefore we should be able to do that. Altus height was
70’ height, Mountain View was 48’. In Vail, height is measure to grade lines. The way Altus got to 70 feet
was public benefit, there was a 1:1 ratio of EHUs to dwelling units and that was a large public benefit for
that height. The other portion of 48’ is in in compliance with HDMF. Are you meeting the level of public
benefit that was proposed at SDD 42?
Ruther, we think we exceed it. It was approved but did not endure. We increased the number of EHUs on
site, our pay in lieu will exceed any pay in lieu benefit that has been afforded to any other SDD. We were
encouraged by the Town to provide a substantial pay in lieu so that the Town could go out and provide
housing elsewhere in the community.
Hagedorn, you’re creating a lot more building face. Near the path to Ford park, the hillside does provide
a buffer currently. It’s helping you by digging out the garden level, but it’s exacerbating the mass of the
building. How do you mitigate it from the common public way?
Ruther, you leave the slope to create that berm, we are proposing to touch nothing on the stream tract.
The south face is more exposed than the northside. The grades are pretty consistent across the site,
we’re going to set the top of our building at the same height. Our site dips down in the center, creating a
dip there would create challenges for access. The hillside is mostly native now, vertical landscape
elements can significantly mask the building. We don’t have to do massive excavation to expose one
more floor of building.
Smith, agrees on the impact on the path. The main concern is the south face, feels like it would be visible
and obscure the peak of golden peak. What would it look like from the path with the berm?
Ruther, when we come back we can show the true grading condition in front of the south elevation.
Smith, the expectation of four stories along the creek, it makes sense if that’s what it looks like.
Jensen, surprised that your public benefit is you’re creating more rooms or beds. Are EHUs public
benefit? It’s just a requirement of development. Needs to understand from staff how this ended up at a
lower height/density versus surrounding properties. The height and mass appears taller, regardless of
the measurement. Struggling with the why of the SDD request.
Tucker, also needs to understand the why of the request. The technicality is explainable but how is that
perceived to fit into the design guidelines, and requiring the SDD to achieve building objectives? Still
wrapping head around it. Using previous development to talk about future development, that’s not how
our code is written to get to a decision.
Ruther, the master plan says north half is 5-6 stories, southern half says four stories. The Wren the
entire property is 5-6 stories, 4 stories for VMV and Altus. We’re drawing our direction from master plan.
Smith, it used to be that every condo building was special enough to get a SDD. Looking at Master plan,
how do you put 5 or six stories in a zone district that is 48 feet. Is it 5-6 stories up?
Ruther, there were some recommendations in the master plan that may never have been followed
through, he had the same question.
Roy, part of that is because floor to floor heights have changed in terms of the norm.
Smith, of all the properties in this stretch, this makes sense for an SDD because of the shape and the
grade. There is hardship that may be met for some of the standards, at some point it tips the needle from
variances to SDD, understand why an SDD.
5
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 22, 2025 443
Smith, how did you get to the higher amount of fee you’re proposing than what is required?
Ruther, in addition to the inclusionary zoning requirement we’re proposing a fee in lieu. There might be
room for more EHUs on site, but believes finding opportunities elsewhere in Town is a great benefit.
Smith, it would be helpful to spell out that difference.
Jensen, we pick a number based on now, but costs change over time. Don’t know if you get 100%
benefit when a project finally happens.
Ruther, recommends the Town not holding money, invest the money when you can.
Roy, Town Code asks for units to be developed onsite, and fee in lieu is generally fractional.
Smith talks about some of the recent housing changes, the fee in lieu rate was recently increased for the
first time in eighteen years. Suggests that the specifics of timing should be clarified.
Ruther heard for years that the Town’s EHU policy should look to the Town first. We’re willing to look at
that language here, employees of the Town.
Smith wants to make sure the Housing department agrees. Adding another type of deed restriction and
complexity for a few units could be an additional administrative burden.
Hagedorn, we need a Title 12 rewrite at this point, we’re not living in a land of code reality with Title 12, if
that’s where it’s going its reasonable that Council gives us that direction with Title 12.
Ruther, EHUs are tied to the real estate market which is flexible but town code is not as quickly
adaptable.
Hagedorn asks for public comment.
Howard Willard lives in Mountain View. This development is wrong for the neighborhood and would
negatively impact the neighbors, Vail, and user of the pedestrian path. The buildings in VMVR, Altus, did
require some modest variances from underlying HDMF zoning. The magnitude was much smaller than
lunar vail is asking for, met less than 55% above grade site coverage requirement. The request for 70’ on
the north frontage road, was controversial at the time but justified by the number of EHUs on site, not
offered by Lunar Vail. There is also a big difference in height on the south side. They’re requesting 6
variances, this second proposal is only marginally better, still massive overdevelopment of the site.
Debbie Charles, an owner at the Wren. A lot of what they’ve shown you has been cherry picking. The
Wren is not thinking about redeveloping at this point. Do not support this project, look at the details, it is
too big in many ways.
Jay Levine, president of VMVR HOA. Now once again we’re presented with an egregious proposal,
doesn’t work in tranquil east vail. It is too tall and too massive and ugly. The developer has not listened
to the neighbors, the minor changes made still leave it in violation of many standards. This project is not
in the interest of the neighbors or Vail itself. We do not oppose development, but not this way.
Lisa Widmier with VMVR. Urge you to reject the proposal, not in the interest of the community or the
environment that makes Vail unique. Designed purely to maximize profit, not to benefit the Town or its
residents. The mass and height are out of scale for the neighborhood, will overshadow Gore Creek and
the pedestrian trail to Ford Park. This project erodes Vail’s natural appeal. Also has concerns about
emergency access. Who benefits from this project? Not the Town’s workforce. Please oppose this
project, protect Vail.
6
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 22, 2025 444
Laura Willard, secretary of board at VMVR. Readys a statement from Mark Caplin, an owner at VMVR.
Not supportive of the plan, they have not gone far enough in reducing the overdevelopment of this site.
Willard shares her own view; very concerned about fire lane and safety, setbacks need to be adhered to
here. This development is too large, too big for the neighborhood.
Kevin Mushlin, on behalf of Ivan, unit 406. He’s been coming to Vail for 10 years, purchased in Altus in
2022. Concerned about this proposal, agrees with prior speakers. Urges PEC to reject this project the
way it is. The zoning regulations are not there to be broken for the benefit of the developer at the
expense of the neighborhood. Wants to make sure the Town of Vail remains what it is, and property
values are protected.
Jacqueline Grosser in Altus. Agrees with others. Also concerned with the flow of traffic in that three way
stop.
Andrew Ovey, a resident at VMVR. Echoing previous comments, massing is out of keeping with the site.
Dave Zessin, president of Apollo Park HOA. There has been speculation on redevelopment since 2014
until approached by Lunar Vail four years ago. We think moving forward on a wholistic redevelopment is
the right thing to do. We looked at several scenarios, this developer does good projects and that’s what
we want. This is opportunity for us to redevelop this building and our middle class people get to stay in
Town.
Lisa Widmier asks what the developer has promised owners of Apollo Park.
Dave Zessin continues. Since 2008 we've thought about developing the east half of the property as
Phase 2. When Mountain View and Altus went up we didn’t provide comment, that’s between the Town
and developer to figure out what’s best for the site.
Ruther says thank you for your comments, they will respond to those at the next meeting. We continue to
reach out, we want to be good neighbors. We take 9,000 sf, we reduce units and now they request
changes. We want to work with neighbors, but need concrete recommendations and solutions. We
compare to neighbors because we ask for equitable review, we’re showing a project less impactful than
some of the things in the area.
Commissioner comment.
Tucker, appreciates hard work of applicants. The neighbors will have concerns, it’s tough to be caught
with a project that’s so fully developed and what code says versus what other projects have been
allowed to do. Looks forward to continued discussion, appreciates that you will be reaching out to
neighbors.
Jensen, would prefer to see a step down. Wants to see it redeveloped, how do we find the right model to
achieve that? There is more mass there than would like to see. Appreciates all the effort, you’ve dotted a
lot of I’s so give you credit. Appreciates Smith’s comments, what you’re proposing on the EHU has public
benefit, would like to see more details of that. Blue Cow Chute, how many more cars in that intersection?
Smith, this is a surface parking lot prime for redevelopment. An SDD does make sense for this site to
achieve a creative development that is in the public interest. It would help to define what the public
interest is. It’s worth pointing out to public, the zoning and master plan hasn’t substantially changed but
fire and landscaping requirements have changed, even since Altus or VMVR. People who wrote master
plan couldn’t have imagined the size of a fire truck now. Apollo Park is carrying a lot of landscape water
for surrounding properties currently. Wren has five feet of grass and no landscape screening on the
property. It would be helpful to have shared fire access, would like to figure out housing
recommendations from staff and council. Reiterates Hagedorns point, there is too much parking in the
plan. Important that we figure out expectation for the Wren so there is congruent plans.
7
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 22, 2025 445
Hagedorn, in terms of height, the northern façade is getting there, apparent height from frontage road is
down. It’s a sloping site but people deal with those all the time. Still concerned about south side, still
reading as six story buildings from the creek path. The master plan says it is appropriate to have more
density along the frontage road. 48’ limit on Mountain View was represented for approvals. The master
plan allows for additional density as incentive to redevelopment, without talking public benefit we’re over
the line of what is acceptable. Understand your constraints but it is part of the site, it’s what people have
to comply with on a modern development.
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC represented by Ruther Associates LLC
Time: 90 min
3.5 A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of a new
Special Development District, pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development Districts,
Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a multi-family project, located at 442
South Frontage Road East/ Vail Village Filing 5, Tract D. (PEC25-0026)
Items 3.4, 3.5, & 3.6 are heard concurrently.
See item 3.5 for staff report and attachments
Planner: Greg Roy
3.6 A request for review of a Conditional Use Permit amendment, pursuant to Section 12-6H-3
Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, in accordance with Title 12, Chapter 16, Conditional
Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow for timeshare units, located at Located at 442 South
Frontage Road East/ Vail Village Filing 5, Tract D. (PEC25-0024)
Applicant Name: Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC represented by Ruther Associates LLC
Time: 5 min
Items 3.4, 3.5, & 3.6 are heard concurrently.
3.7
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a prescribed regulations
Robyn Smith made a motion to Continue to the meeting on October 13th; William A Jensen seconded
the motion Passed (4 - 0).
Staff Memo PEC25-0026 (SDD) & PEC25-0024 (CUP).pdf
Attachment A. Applicant's Narrative.pdf
Attachment B. Lunar Park Traffic Assessment 7-17-25.pdf
Attachment C. Lunar Park - EIR - 7-23-25.pdf
Attachment D. PEC25-0026 Documents.pdf
Attachment E. PEC25-0026 Plans Part1.pdf
Attachment E. PEC25-0026 Plans Part2.pdf
Attachment E. PEC25-0026 Plans Part3.pdf
Attachment F. Lunar Park Public Comment 9-22-2025.pdf
Attachment G. PEC Results 9-8-25.pdf
Attachment H. Applicant Presentation.pdf
Robyn Smith made a motion to Continue to the meeting on October 13th; William A Jensen seconded
the motion Passed (4 - 0).
Robyn Smith made a motion to Continue to the meeting on October 13th; William A Jensen seconded
the motion Passed (4 - 0).
8
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 22, 2025 446
Planner: Jamie Leaman-Miller
Applicant Name: Town of Vail Housing Department
Time: 60 Min
amendment to Section 12-13-5(D)(5), Fee in Lieu, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendments,
Vail Town Code, to allow Town Council to accept a fee in lieu for an exchange EHU upon a
finding that the exchange EHU is being underutilized. (PEC25-0030)
Timestamp: 04:03
Planner Leaman-Miller (LM) gives presentation; he describes the proposal and gives the background of
EHU exchange program. He reviews the existing code language and the proposed language.
Jensen asks about the 7-day payment, is it tied to building permit?
LM states that it is a slight adjustment to the current code. Anna Bengston of Housing department can
answer that further.
Planner Roy clarifies. He states it is 7 days from Town Council approval of the exchange. These are
existing properties, so there is no new development and no building permit. If approved for the
exchange, payment would be due in 7 days of approval.
Tucker asks what is driving this change?
Roy states that it is best for the applicant to answer that.
Housing Director Jason Dietz also answers that Bengston can answer that.
Bengston introduces herself. She describes the changes to the program. Housing wants to make sure that
existing deed restrictions meet the needs of the community. They want to identify those that are
underutilized. She identifies three goals: expand the ability of the fee-in-lieu portion, address the
challenges in current EHUs (non-comliance, etc(, and provide another tool to make EHUs more
successful. She adds that the hope is to facilitate turnover of underutilized units and utilize TOV owned
properties like Timber Ridge.
Bengston adds that the exchange multiplier will still apply but this would allow for negotiation with
fees regarding units with known issues.
Jensen describes a scenario where there is a 25-year-old EHU and the owner is not working anymore.
The market value of a non-deed restricted unit is higher now. Can they enter negotiations with the Town
to get rid of deed restriction?
Dietz states that there are many cases where units are no longer being utilized or rented and the idea
here is to convert that to more units or more affordable units. It is not proposed for monetary gain.
There is a retirement policy in place. He adds that there are instances of poor HOA treatment towards
EHU tenants and the intent is to protect interests of the local renter.
Jensen follows up with a scenario of a unit turned storage unit of sorts.
Dietz agreed that there are a lot of underutilized units out there and brings up the poor treatment by
HOAs. We want to create more affordable units instead of units that are sitting empty. That is the
direction from the Town's legal department.
Jensen asks if Housing is comfortable with the draft of the language that is proposed? Does it address
the issues and the intent? What did you not forsee?
Dietz states that is why they are looking at old deed restrictions. Trying to adapt to changing times.We
are trying to take existing deed restrictions that don't work and turn into something that works as a
funding source.
Jensen asks how successful do you see this being in 12-36 months?
Dietz replies that they are trying to knock out multiple under-performing units, hopefully 10-20 in a
PEC25-0030 Staff Memo.pdf
A. Applicant Narrative - Vail Housing Department.pdf
B. Draft Ordinance Amendment.pdf
C. Redlined Version - Existing and Proposed Language.pdf
9
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 22, 2025 447
timely fashion.
Hagedorn asks when the fee in lieu amount was last updated.
Dietz states earlier this year but before that, it was 10 years.
Smith adds that it was actually18 years and was lowered in that 18 years. May was the first rise.
Dietz states that the fee in lieu data was based off of AMI data but is a lagging indicator that is a few
years behind. We should update this annually.
Hagedorn asks if it can be assumed that it went up in May?
Smith states that it doubled.
Dietz agrees.
Jensen asks if this is a negotiated process?
Dietz says yes.
Hagedorn asks if this is another back door method to prop up Timber Ridge?
Dietz states that it is one of the many strategies to increase affordability of TOV EHU portfolio, buy
down units and partnered with Habitat on 10+ units. Eagle County might fund some too. Middle
income level is tough. TOV has put in 10s of millions of dollars to help with affordability of Timber
Ridge and West Middle Creek. Theres a massive demand for more affordable units at Timber Ridge,
and we need to drive down the affordability of these units.
Tucker asks are there ways to have HOAs maintain the EHUs on site? What are we doing to protect
these units?
Dietz states that it need to be approved by Town Council. We don't want people to be happy in EHUs
and then the owner sells it. We are looking at the ones that are empty.
Jensen asks why we aren't targeting high-performing EHUs then?
Dietz, no, the language states underperforming. Staff would not recommend that conversion to TC.
Smith asks if there would be a multiplier depending on geographic location?
Dietz states yes, that is still in place as it exists today in our code.
Smith clarifies that if it is on Beaver Dam, would we get more than $675 per square feet? This is an
opportunity to make more for housing.
Dietz states that it is a 3 to 1 ratio for fee-in-lieu in that area, but it would have to be underperforming.
Smith asks about available GRFA and if the EHU transfers out. Could it be over GRFA?
Roy adds that it would require a DRB application to analyze GRFA allowance
Smith asks about how to remove EHU and meet GRFA.
Smith adds that she thinks this is fully baked and Town Council will make the final decision. They are
going to do what they're going to do. If we exchanged every EHU in Vail, we would get double the
housing money. I would support it as I don;t think we could change it. Council is putting a priorty on
housing.
Hagedorn asks about the definition of underutilized. Is it council to decide that?
Dietz adds that staff would guide Council on that.
Smith adds that there should be guidelines in the housing guidelines for that. Criteria for review should
be added.
No further questions.
Public comment:
Galen Oslind, 35 year resident of Vail, architect, on PEC. He refers to a map of 1970 Vail, describes the
large lots that started Vail. Then refers to 1979 Ordinance #22 that created smaller lots with larger
density. He talks about County land vs Vail land in West Vail. He talks about 1992 when the EHU need
was established. He refers to past EHU exchanges and how the rate was based on the cost of the overall
property, it appeared to be less than 1% of property value on Mill Creek Circle. Is this equitable across
all lots throughout Vail? He also talks about how TOV housing has continually mis-represents his EHU
size.
Lauren Wallace asks about the definition of under-utilized. She states that HOA bullying should not be
a reason.
10
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 22, 2025 448
4.1 PEC Results 09-8-25
5. Information Update
5.1 Upcoming Text Amendment on Eating and Drinking Establishments
6. Adjournment
Commissioner comments:
Smith states that she has said her piece.
Jensen states that the language is broad. 1% seems to be the value. He can't help but feel that this will
benefit Timber Ridge even though he does like mortgage buy-downs of the Timber Ridge program. He
needs a better definition to parts of this but trusts the Town Council. This is for the long-term.
Tucker echoes Jensen and Smith. He needs a language to define under-utilized. There is a long history
of buyouts and it's hard to get people to build EHUs in the first place.
Hagedorn states that so much lately is focused on supporting Timber Ridge. More framework is needed.
He can't get here on this and his vote is a no.
Jensen adds that he will also vote no but can make a motion. He urges them to come back with
revisions.
William A Jensen made a motion to forward a recommendation of denial finding it does not meet the
findings on page 15 of the staff memo; Robyn Smith seconded the motion Passed (4 - 0).
4.Approval of Minutes
PEC Results 9-8-25.pdf
William A Jensen made a motion to Approve ; Robyn Smith seconded the motion Passed (4 - 0).
Draft Language 09-22-25 PEC Info Update.pdf
Community Development Director Matt Gennett gives up update on this topic, they will be back on the
13th with further information.
5.2 Vail Village Master Plan Amendment - Red Lion Building
Proposed Vail Village Master Plan Amendment - Red Lion Building (1).pdf
George Ruther with Ruther Associates gives a short introduction to the topic. They will be back on the
13th with additional information.
William A Jensen made a motion to Adjourn ; Robyn Smith seconded the motion Passed (4 - 0).
11
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of September 22, 2025 449
September 24, 2025
Attention: Greg Roy, Planning Manager
Town of Vail, Community Development Office
Dear Greg,
This letter serves to begin the dialogue regarding the required public art mitigation for the
private development Lunar/Apollo Park, a special development district.
With the recent opening of the Vail Art Studio in Ford Park, the Art in Public Places Board would
like to request housing within Lunar for visiting artists as part of the public benefit in lieu of the
proposed public art donation. A one-bedroom or studio apartment would be ideal to alleviate the
lodging needs for Vail’s public art program.
On behalf of the Art in Public Places Board I would be interested in pursuing this opportunity. I
look forward to continuing this discussion.
Kindest regards,
Molly Eppard
450
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
Employee Housing Plan
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Special Development District No. 44
442 South Frontage Road
Vail Town Council
January 6, 2026
Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025
“#3 Private Sector Importance – We foster a proactive, solutions-oriented
environment that promotes private-sector investment to create deed-
restricted homes.”
Resolution No. 13, Series of 2024, Vail Town Council
451
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
Employee Housing Plan
Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
Special Development District No. 44
442 South Frontage Road
Vail Town Council
January 6, 2026
Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025
Written Narrative
The Applicant intends to ensure that the new residential development of the Lunar Vail Residences
and Apollo Park provides more than the minimum required to mitigate the direct impact on
employee housing. This is achieved by complying with Chapter 12-24, Inclusionary Zoning, of the
Vail Town Code, plus an additional 75% beyond the adopted requirement, for a total mitigation rate
of 17.5%. This approach to community housing mitigation is unprecedented in the Town of Vail's
development history.
To that end, the Applicants have prepared an Employee Housing Plan for the L unar Vail Residences
and Apollo Park that aligns with the Vail Comprehensive Plan and the Town of Vail's adopted housing
policies pursuant to Resolution No. 13, Series of 2024. Speciflcally, the Employee Housing Plan
meets the adopted housing goal and development objectives of the Vail Housing 2027 Strategic Plan.
It aligns with the 2024 Housing Policy Statements adopted by the Vail Town Council.
The Employee Housing Plan aims to sustain the Vail community by creating new community housing
for Vail residents. As identifled in this Plan, more than 10,775 square feet of new deed-restricted
GRFA is provided on-site within eleven (11) new homes. This new housing will be immediately
available for occupancy upon the issuance of a certiflcate of occupancy for the Lunar Vail
Residences North building. An additional payment-in-lieu fee of $665,624 will be provided. This fee
will be paid before the issuance of the flrst certiflcate of occupancy.
Conservatively speaking, if invested wisely, assuming a 25% Vail InDEED deed-restriction purchase
contribution ($250 per sq.ft.) at a fair market value (FMV) purchase price of $1,000 per square foot,
this innovative approach to funding and delivering community housing yields approximately 2,662
square feet of additional new community housing. This brings the total housing contribution to
13,437 square feet of net new community housing in Vail. For comparative purposes, that is roughly
30% of the entire Chamonix Vail neighborhood. Chamonix Vail is arguably the most successful
“missing middle” community housing initiative in Vail.
Further, as proposed, the Employee Housing Plan advances adopted Housing Policy Statements #2
and #3, which state,
#2 Housing Partners – We use public/private partnerships and actively pursue
local and regional solutions to increase the supply of deed-restricted homes.
#3 Private Sector Importance – We foster a proactive, solutions-oriented
environment that promotes private-sector investment to create deed-
452
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
restricted homes.
#9 Keep Up With Demand - New development, both residential and
commercial, is obligated to mitigate its incremental impact on the demand
for resident-occupied, deed-restricted homes. Payment in lieu may be
needed at times, but it is the least preferred mitigation method.
#10 Deed Restrictions Benefit Vail Businesses – Preference to leasing and
ownership of deed-restricted homes is granted to employees and employers
of businesses located within the municipal boundaries of the Town of Vail.
#11 Full Range of Home Options – We pursue housing solutions that address
the continuum of housing needs for all residents of the Vail community,
including both higher- and lower-density residential developments for varying
area median income wage earners.
Calculation Method
The Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park total 67,199 square feet of net new GRFA.
Net new GRFA is deflned as,
“total gross new square footage minus existing gross square footage”.
In this instance, the total gross square footage is 95,097. The existing gross square footage is 27,898.
Therefore, as per Title 12, Chapter 24, Inclusionary Zoning, Vail Town Code, the Applicant commits
to provide at least an additional 10% of the new GRFA square feet (minimum) as deed -restricted
GRFA based upon the following formulas:
[95,097 square feet of gross square feet – 27,898 square feet of existing GRFA] x 10% mitigation
rate = 6,720 square feet of new deed-restricted community housing.
To achieve an effective mitigation rate of 17.5%, however, or 75% beyond the required 10% mitigation
rate, the following formula applies:
Applicant proposes to construct 10,775 square feet of deed-restricted community housing on-site
within eleven (11) new homes. Although only 50% of the deed-restricted housing is required to be
on-site, and the remaining 50% is permitted to be off-site, as a public beneflt, the Applicant proposes
to construct 92% of the total obligation on-site. The Applicant intends to fulflll the remaining 8%, or
985 square feet, subject to a fee-in-lieu payment of $665,624 at $675.76 per square foot.
95,097 square feet of gross square feet – 27,898 square feet of existing GRFA] x 17.5% mitigation
rate = 11,760 square feet of new deed-restricted community housing.
453
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
The flnal deed-restricted housing obligation will be as outlined in a Development Agreement
executed by and between the Applicants and the Vail Town Council.
Plans
A copy of the architectural fioor plans for each of the ten (10) on-site homes demonstrating
compliance with the Building Requirements of Section 12-24-3, is attached for reference in the
Approved Development Plan. As shown, the home sizes exceed the minimum building requirement
of Section 12-24-3. Homes highlighted below in PURPLE are proposed deed-restricted units.
Schedule
As per Section 12-24-10, Timing, Vail Town Code, the Applicant hereby acknowledges that each of
the eleven (11) on-site deed-restricted homes shall be ready for occupancy before the issuance of
the flrst certiflcate of occupancy issued for the Lunar Vail Residences North building. An additional
fee-in-lieu of $665,624 will be paid before issuance of the building permit.
Off-site Units
No off-site homes are proposed.
Fees in lieu.
The Applicant intends to rely on a fee-in-lieu payment to exceed the inclusionary zoning requirement
for the Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park. The fee amount exceeds the requirements of the Vail
Town Code. The fee-in-lieu amount is based on the recently updated fee-in-lieu per-square-foot
costs of $675.76 per square foot, as adopted by Resolution No. 23, Series of 2025. The amount will
be documented in a Development Agreement, to be mutually agreed and executed, before the
issuance of a building permit for the Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park.
454
RUTHER ASSOCIATES LLC
455
1
Greg Roy
From:Anna Bengtson
Sent:Thursday, October 9, 2025 9:53 AM
To:Greg Roy
Cc:Jason Dietz
Subject:PEC25-0026: Lunar Vail Review Comments
Good morning, Greg.
Since I’m still stuck in ProjectDox limbo, here are my comments and questions regarding the Lunar Vail employee
housing plan:
Written Narrative, Parking Plans, and Floor Plans
If I am reading this correctly, it looks like each EHU is assigned one parking space. I would encourage
assigning 2 parking spaces to at least the 2-bedroom EHU (and even to a couple of the 1-bedroom EHUs) to
support couples and/or families considering these units.
The narrative and plans have previously shown the residents will be assigned storage space as one of the
development amenities. It is not clear in the plans yet, I am assuming the EHUs are included and will also
have adequately assigned storage space?
The current Written Narrative and Employee Housing Plan meet the minimum 10% Inclusionary Zoning
employee housing mitigation requirement. As such, there is not a demonstrated public benefit associated
with employee housing.
Employee Housing Plan
There is a comment about splitting the proposed fee in lieu payment between building permit and
certificate of occupancy. However, Town Code requires that all fees in lieu are due prior to issuance of a
building permit (12-24-6(4)(c)).
Appreciate seeing the clear Inclusionary Zoning mitigation calculation as well as the increase in on site
EHUs. While this complies with Town Code 12-24-6(A) requirement for 50% on site mitigation, the current
Town policy outlined in the Vail Village Master Plan is for all employee housing required by zoning
regulations to be provided on site (Vail Village Master Plan, Goal #2, Objective 2.6, Policy 2.6.4 located on
Page 10).
It is noted that the Town Council will determine the total amount of the fee in lieu payment. Town Council
updated the Commercial Linkage and Inclusionary Zoning fees in lieu in Resolution No. 23, Series of 2025
in May. The current Inclusionary Zoning fee in lieu per square foot is $675.76, which would set the
proposed payment at $928,494.24. It is worth noting that these fees in lieu are supposed to be annually
updated by Resolution and are therefore subject to change in 2026.
Miscellaneous
Am I correct in assuming that the EHUs are for sale units? Just want to confirm.
I am still curious about the general expectation for unit pricing. I understand this is not a specific Town
Code requirement, but the Vail Village Master Plan policy speaks to facilitating the development of
“aƯordable” housing and providing housing at a range of price points supports the Town’s strategic goal to
oƯer a continuum of housing.
Happy to get on the phone to clarify and discuss any of the above!
Best,
456
2
Anna
Anna Bengtson
Housing
Housing Development Specialist
75 S. Frontage Road W.
Vail, Colorado 81657
e: abengtson@vail.gov
p: 970-477-3537
c: 970-904-9905
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
From:Sandra Kosht
To:CommDev
Subject:Lunar Vail development
Date:Monday, September 8, 2025 12:44:14 PM
To whom it may concern,
As timeshare owners of the Wren at Vail since it was built. We are Very much opposed to the
change in variances that are proposed for this new project next door and any where in Vail for
that matter. The variance is there for a reason and should not be changed. I could go on and on
but won’t bore you with all my thoughts. Please don’t let them do this to this amazing
beautiful piece of Colorado.
Thanks,
Sandra Kosht
530
From:slanschuetz@gmail.com
To:CommDev
Subject:Apollo Park proposed development
Date:Sunday, September 21, 2025 7:06:52 AM
As a property, owner and neighbor of Apollo Park, I am contacting you to voicemail opposition to the
development proposal being considered by your committee.
While development is never “static “and things do change, the degree to which the proposed
development – even with its newer scaled down version – stands out as an aberration from the area
for which it’s proposed is significant.
While variances from code can be granted for good reason, the code has been established also for
an even better reason – to keep the profile of buildings to a desired size. The number and degree to
which the proposed building’s requested variances should speak for themselves. The proposed
building is too large and would result in an imposing and quite unattractive addition to the
neighborhood.
I understand new development in Vail will continue – and I benefit from that overall. However, I do
hope the committee will scale back what they deem permissible for this proposed structure to be
less overwhelming and less of a blight on that area.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sara Anschuetz
The Wren, # 405
531
From:Arie Behar
To:CommDev
Subject:Apollo Garden
Date:Sunday, September 21, 2025 10:01:40 AM
To Whom It be concerned
After carefully reviewing the revised proposal submitted by the
developer, it is apparent that the substantive concerns raised by the
residents and community members have not been adequately
addressed.
The updated submission makes only minimal changes, while the core
issues remain unresolved. Specifically, the proposal continues to
reflect:
High density beyond what is compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood.
Setback variances at the front, rear, and sides of the property
that disregard established zoning requirements.
These variances, if granted, would significantly alter the character of
the area, negatively affect the environment, and diminish the quality
of life for nearby residents.
We respectfully urge the reviewing authority to require the developer
to present a plan that genuinely addresses these issues and is more
consistent with both community concerns and the intent of the
zoning regulations.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
532
Arie Behar
Resident unit 201 The Wren
Arie
533
From:Ted Rehm
To:CommDev; Greg Roy
Subject:I am against the Apollo Park development
Date:Sunday, September 21, 2025 5:52:31 PM
I am opposed to this development because the developer is asking for far too many
variances to be waived. This is a massive project, which all of it's neighbors are opposed to
it for this site. If this were a smaller project, or a larger site, and the developer was not
asking for each variance to be waived, I would have no problem allowing it to go forward...
but I believe the developer is offering to make small changes that really have little impact
on the size of the project.
Please ask the developer to go back to the drawing board, and make changes that have
some significance.
Thank you
Edward Rehm
Owner of Wren 308
And past assistant building commissioner of Wheaton ILL.
534
From:Sherri Hynden
To:CommDev
Subject:Apollo Park Redevelopment variance concerns - meeting 9/22/25
Date:Sunday, September 21, 2025 6:17:39 PM
>>>>>> Dear PEC,
We are writing again to you in order to express our concerns with the Apollo Park Redevelopment project. We
understand some
minor adjustments have been made but nothing
significant. The developers continue to press for huge variances and promote a project that towers over its
neighbors. Note: Altus should never have been approved in the first place.
>>>>>> The new proposal still seeks significant variances on 6 major zoning requirements just like the last one
including: dwelling units per acre, site coverage, GRFA, building height, setbacks and landscaping. The average %
variance requested as a % of the HDMF requirement for the six items went from 76% to 66%. We feel this
>>>>>> latest proposal is simply a disingenuous attempt to create the illusion of listening and responding to
feedback. They are still asking for a GRFA variance that is 145% greater than the HDMF requirement and an above
ground site coverage that is 62% compared to the HDMF requirement of 55%. They also continue to request
permission to provide less landscaping than the HDMF requirement.
We are disappointed in this attempt to “cut back” the development as the commissioners requested at the last
meeting.
We encourage the PEC to stand firm and keep the new develop in our beautiful Vail Village in line with the Master
Plans.
Please remember, this is Vail Village and not Lionshead.
We appreciate your efforts and trust your oversight in this very important matter.
Sincerely yours,
Sherri & Eric Hynden
Wren owners for 10 years
535
From:Jeffrey Lovelace
To:CommDev
Subject:Apollo Park
Date:Sunday, September 21, 2025 6:31:58 PM
Dear Commissioners,
It would be a shame to allow 70’ buildings with only 20’ setbacks. The shadow in winter across Frontage Rd will
create ice and snow hazards for traffic and pedestrians. The problem already exists next door with Altus another tall
building.
Also, I trust a performance bond be placed on project to protect the Next door neighbors like The Wren from
damage from blasting or construction.
Respectfully submitted,
Jeffrey Lovelace
Skier of Vail since 1966 and condominium owner at The Wren
Sent from my iPhone
536
From:Debbie Charles
To:CommDev; Greg Roy
Subject:9/22 Revised Apollo Park/Lunar Vail Redevelopment Proposal
Date:Sunday, September 21, 2025 9:32:53 PM
I am a whole-owner at The Wren. My unit abuts the Apollo Park southeast property line, so I
have many concerns.
The proposal that was revised for the 9/22 meeting has not changed significantly and should
be sent back to be further reduced in size. The concerns expressed by the commissioners and
the public on 9/8 were not adequately addressed in this new proposal.
GRFA was reduced 7.7% and is still 259% over existing zoning
DU per acre - reduced from 60 to 55 - remaining 177% over existing zoning
Max building height went from 78 to 70 ft - it remains 22 ft over allowable 48 ft zoning
The 3D renderings are incorrect. The rendering of The Wren shows buildings that do not
exist and make our property look congested. They do not show the large north building next
to current buildings.
The step-down of the roof that was requested shows a roof-top amenity area instead of a
stepped down roof - what is to be in the amenity area that overlooks The Wren pool area?
There are privacy, lighting and noise concerns. This is not a good solution to a step-down
request.
The retaining wall on the southeast corner is five feet from our property line and it is unclear
how this will impact the corner of The Wren.
The project should be sent back to the drawing board to be redesigned to fit 1.3 acres
according to Vail standards. The proposed property is not appropriate for this part of the
village that runs along the Gore Creek and borders Ford Park. We do not want the look and
feel of a medieval village in this part of Vail.
Another work session should definitely be required before this project is voted upon, with
adequate time for review by interested parties.
Regards
Debbie Charles
537
538
From:Julie Suesserman
To:CommDev; Greg Roy
Subject:Letter of Opposition - Apollo Redevelopment Plan
Date:Monday, September 22, 2025 6:08:38 AM
To the Members of the Planning and Zoning Board,
I am writing to formally oppose the proposed Apollo Redevelopment Plan
in its current form.
The variances requested — regarding height, gross floor area (GFRA),
number of units, inadequate landscaping, and the size and scale of the
parking structure — are so significantly and grossly in excess of what the
zoning ordinance allows that they speak for themselves as reasons for
denial. Zoning restrictions exist to protect the character, environment, and
property values of the community, and this proposal disregards those
protections.
A redevelopment project should enhance and contribute to the aesthetics of
Vail, while also supporting and strengthening surrounding property values.
Unfortunately, this project, as currently presented, does neither.
The minor changes submitted by the developers for the September 22
meeting fail to meaningfully address the concerns previously raised by the
community. This raises serious questions as to whether there is a genuine
commitment to working with residents in good faith to reach an appropriate
outcome.
Additionally, I strongly urge the Board to require clear and comprehensive
renderings that show the project in relation to surrounding properties before
any approval is granted. A redevelopment of this scale cannot be properly
understood or evaluated without an accurate visual representation of what it
looks like in relation to the surrounding properties.
While I recognize the importance of redevelopment, the current proposal
does not align with the established character of the area and ignores the
539
intent behind zoning standards, which are in place to protect the interests of
the broader community. Until these issues are adequately addressed, I
respectfully but firmly request that this plan not be approved
Sincerely,
Julie Suesserman (Wren 201 LLC)
The Wren 201
Sent from my iPhone
540
From:Barbara
To:CommDev
Subject:New Lunar Vail Project
Date:Monday, September 22, 2025 9:31:34 AM
Hello,
We are owners of a condo in The Wren and wish to convey to the PEC our opposition to the size of the proposed
project next door. Building codes were established years ago for the purpose of protecting our narrow valley from
unsightly and oversized construction and to preserve sight lines to our beautiful mountain. Lunar Vail and the Wren
are the first complexes people see as they approach from the east - if variances are granted to Lunar Vail all people
will see is a building facade and not a wow view of Vail Mountain . The Wren and Apollo Park currently provide a
smooth transition from the openness of Ford Park and The Betty Ford Alpine Gardens to the urbanization of Vail
Village. When the Anholtz family sold their land - they had the vision to put a contingency on the sale that
prevented the land to be used for housing or commercial endeavors- so we have this beautiful park to enjoy. I don’t
believe that the proposed size of Lunar Vail is in line with that vision. The current allowed height and density should
be honored not changed.
Please take this under consideration.
Barbara Palermo and Kenneth Maloney
Sent from my iPhone
541
From:Mark Caplan
To:CommDev
Cc:Laura Willard; Mark Caplan
Subject:Apollo Park redevelopment
Date:Monday, September 22, 2025 11:42:04 AM
My wife and I own #306 at Vail Mountain View Residences. We cannot make the meeting
today. We have seen the proposed changes to the plan. We are not supportive. They have not
gone nearly far enough in reducing the significant overdevelopment of this site. Please do not
approve it in its current form. It will negatively impact the character of our village.
542
543
From:Ralph Cioffi
To:CommDev
Subject:Opposition to the Appolo Park Variance request.
Date:Monday, September 22, 2025 6:39:23 PM
We are owners and in season residents at Altus Vail, unit 205. We do not rent our unit and
plan on being full time residents in the near future. We love Vail Village and all that makes
the Village so special. My wife and I understand that developers do need rational variances to
offset possible irregularities in the subject site, to address zoning and building code that maybe
outdated and less relevant today and of course the variances may be needed to make the
property/condo units more desirable and profitable to the developer.
We have reviewed the developers' changes/improvements and although he has attempted to
make changes, they are quite minimal and still excessive versus the development code in
place. We are strongly opposed to the plan and the amendments he as offered as an alternative
to address the PEC concerns and residents' concerns. They do very little to improve on his
plan relative to the well-known major complaints and concerns so many have voiced. It's clear
that the developer needs the variances to develop a profitable project by adding more units. He
needs more units, thus the height variance request, the greater GFRA and above ground lot
coverage and set back variance requests. There is no benefit to the Village, no enhancement to
his neighbors at all or to our community at large. Vote NO!
(One item that really sticks out is the landscape variance, why?)
--
Ralph Cioffi
Phyllis Cioffi
544
From:Caryn Clayman
To:CommDev
Cc:hawillard@aol.com
Subject:PEC Meeting 10-13-25 Apollo Park Redevelopment
Date:Saturday, October 4, 2025 6:50:33 PM
Attachments:apolloparkltr10425.pdf
Planning and Environmental Commission –
Attached is my letter regarding the redevelopment of Apollo Park for your reconsideration.
Caryn J. Clayman
Caryn J. Clayman
P.O. Box 810186
Boca Raton, FL 33481-0186
561-289-6410 (Mobile)
Email: caryn@cjclayman.com
545
546
547
From:HOWARD WILLARD
To:CommDev
Subject:Letter for Apollo Park Redevelopment Discussion at 10/13 Vail PEC
Date:Tuesday, October 7, 2025 7:57:00 AM
548
549
550
Sent from my iPad
551
From:Robert Sires
To:CommDev
Cc:Robert Sires
Subject:Apollo Park Redevelopment Proposal
Date:Tuesday, October 7, 2025 7:36:29 AM
To Whom It May Concern,
My name is Robert Sires and I am the owner of Altus Unit #402. My wife and I are winter
residents in Vail.
Together with members of the VMVR, Altus, and Wren HOA boards—as well as many fellow
homeowners—we have formed a coalition to oppose the Apollo Park Redevelopment
Proposal submitted by Ron Byrne for consideration at the PEC meeting on October 13, 2025.
We also support an alternative development proposal that is more appropriate for the area.
We are strongly against the current Apollo Park Redevelopment Proposal and urge the PEC
not to give it a positive recommendation to the Vail Town Council. The proposal is
incompatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and would negatively impact
property values and the quality of life for neighboring residents. Additionally, the
redevelopment would create an unsightly view from I-70 and disrupt the peaceful atmosphere
of the path along Gore Creek that leads to the botanical gardens, Ford Park, and the athletic
fields.
The proposed buildings are excessively tall, include an inappropriately high Gross Residential
Floor Area (GRFA) and Units per Acre, and result in too much above-ground site coverage
with insufficient landscaping. The variances being requested are significantly more extensive
than those granted for SDD #42 (VMVR and Altus)—the only other approved SDD in the
area.
We are especially concerned about the height of both the LVN and Apollo Park buildings. We
believe reducing above-ground site coverage by increasing the east and west setbacks of the
LVN building by 10 feet is critically important.
For more detailed support of our position, I refer you to the letter submitted by Jay Levine,
President of Vail Mountain View Residences.
Sincerely,
Robert Sires
Owner, Altus #402
552
From:jay levine
To:CommDev
Subject:Statement re: Apollo Park application 10/13 meeting
Date:Tuesday, October 7, 2025 6:34:36 AM
To: Vail PEC and Greg Roy, Town Planner (cdev@vail.gov)
Date: 10/6/25
From: Jay Levine, President of the Vail Mountain View Residences HOA for the VMVR HOA Board
My name is Jay Levine and I have been working with Howard Willard and members of the
VMVR, Altus and Wren HOA boards and many of their homeowners to create a coalition focused on examine and
reaction as a community to the Apollo Park Redevelopment Proposal.
We have also created an Alternate Development Proposal.
Howard Willard will be submitting a letter that represents the views of the coalition and the
For the record, The VMVR HOA Board strongly opposes the proposal submitted by Ron Byrne to the 10/13/2025
PEC Meeting and supports the Alternative Development outlined in Mr. Willard's letter.
I look forward to expanding on my comments at the October 13th meeting.
Thank you.
Jay Levine
Smartphone Sent. Please excuse typos.
553
From:Craig Carty
To:CommDev
Subject:Apollo Park Redevelopment
Date:Tuesday, October 7, 2025 12:37:18 PM
Attachments:IMG_1067.HEIC
IMG_1090.HEIC
IMG_0994.HEIC
Date: October 7th, 2025
To: Vail PEC and Greg Roy, Town Planner
From: Craig Carty, full condo owner at The Wren
In reference to the Apollo Park redevelopment and the new development of Lunar Vail, I am
opposed to this project in it's current proposal of October 13th for the PEC meeting. I attended
the September 30th meeting in person and the applicant, George Ruther, stated that he was
told by many neighboring owners the applicant doesn’t have the right to develop the property
and they should just go away. I believe that most, if not all, neighbors believe that the
applicant has the absolute right to redevelop, however, it needs to fit the lot and more
importantly it needs to fit into the neighborhood. We are a neighborhood along the Gore Creek
and not just a special development district. We, the neighbors of our neighborhood along the
Gore Creek Corridor to Ford Park, are counting on and trusting in the PEC to not rush into
approving this grossly oversized project. PEC and town staff, please do the work to make sure
this redevelopment fits into our neighborhood correctly, so most of the neighbors can be proud
of what's developed for many years to come.
I'm including images, please see images A & B, of the current Apollo Park buildings, one
from the east and one from the west. In both cases, you can see that the current two buildings
are 3 stories tall. The current proposal is requesting a 6 story building, doubling the building
height, along our Gore Creek Corrdor. This is just too tall for our neighborhood along Gore
Creek. The new Lunar North building, matches Altus at the street and does not step down
adequately relatively to the sloping lot. It is too large and takes up too much of the small lot.
Please see image C showing Altus and the sloping lot. The new building, Lunar North, coming
back on that lot at that same street level height as Altus would just be two tall as it gets
towards the back of the property.
Other points of concern:
GRFA is 163% over current HDMF zoning (not including EHU SF)
Density units per acre is 120% over current zoning (not including EHU SF)
Above site ground coverage is 60%, currently over allowed amount of 55%
Landscaping, in which the developer includes rooftop greenery, does not meet the required
30%
Maximum height at 70 feet is 46% in excess of the 48 feet allowed
I also have great concerns about "Payment in Lieu" in this development. The PEC and the
town staff have the job of protecting the community and the neighbors affected, maybe to a
554
fiduciary level. When the town is receiving a cash payment they become a financial
beneficiary of the development and a financial partner to the developer. It is indisputable and
creates a conflict of interest for the Town of Vail. I understand this may be out of the scope of
the PEC, but the conflict does exist for both the town staff and the PEC.
Sincerely,
Craig Carty
352-359-2929
Image A
Image B
Image C
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
From:Debbie Charles
To:CommDev
Subject:Lunar Vail 10-13-25 Proposal
Date:Tuesday, October 7, 2025 12:39:24 PM
To: Vail PEC and Greg Roy, Town Planner
Date: October 7, 2025
From: Debbie Charles, Wren owner 401 and HOA VP and Treasurer
I have been working with members of the VMVR and Altus HOA boards, as well as
many neighboring homeowners to create a coalition focused on opposing the current
Apollo Park redevelopment plan, as submitted to the Vail PEC for the 10/13 meeting.
I support the alternative proposal submitted by VMVR Project Manager, Howard
Willard, but would be even more agreeable to a smaller building footprint and height,
if the PEC would support such a plan.
Since the 9/28 meeting, rather than reducing the size, the developer actually
increased the GRFA by almost 1,700 square feet to 106,521. Some of my
observations regarding the plan are as follows.
Both Altus/VMVR and Lunar Vail properties are approximately the same acreage, at
only 1.3 acres. The Altus/VMVR parcel is packed with the two buildings, with the only
real green space along the east side, where there is an easement for fire trucks lined
with trees. Above site ground coverage is 48%, versus 60% requested by Lunar
Vail. This alone demonstrates how inappropriate the project is, as Lunar Vail
buildings are just too tight on the lot and too high. The shape of the lot does not lend
to the three structures they are proposing.
The amenities are undesirable. The rendering of the pool looks like a lap pool
wedged between a narrow canyon of very tall buildings. It will be difficult to sell the
units that do not have a direct view of the mountain in the north building.
Landscape coverage includes rooftop greenery, which should not be counted and
may not be maintained long-term as green space. Even with that, they do not meet
the 30% requirement. The presentation states that vertical greenery (trees) to be
removed along the east boundary is The Wren’s decision to have replaced. The
developer does not state that they have required The Wren to share the maintenance
cost of the water main along that boundary, which is fifty years old and most likely will
need to be replaced. There should be enough of an easement for them to plant trees
without relying on us to pay for a water line. We did not cause the current trees to be
removed.
I have walked on all sides of current Apollo Park and anyone would say it is three
stories tall. The developer may state that the height of their building is the same as
VMVR, at four stories, but that is because new Apollo Park’s six stories dig down into
the ground, forever changing the look of the creek corridor to tourists and residents
562
passing by. They should not do anything more than what was allowed by
VMVR. This is a “greener” part of town than some areas, as you approach the
garden/park and walk along Gore Creek. That look should be preserved.
There still needs to be a 3D model with all surrounding properties showing just as
they are. Whiting them out, as the presentation currently does, neglects to show how
crowded this area of multiple buildings will look like when complete. Also, an accurate
creek view of the new buildings is needed in an accurate 3D model.
Vail is beginning to look like the Miami coastline – just one tall generic building after
another. The decisions you make now will change Vail forever. The charm and
appeal of Vail need to remain into the future to keep it a top tourist destination and
desirable place to live.
The developer and their team are trying to get the largest, most profitable
development approved, as that is what it is all about to them. Please do not let them
wear you down by saying that they have come to you enough times and you must
approve. They need to make changes that will enhance the neighborhood, not
detract from it. I respectfully ask that you require the needed changes before you
vote.
563
From:Jacob Grosser
To:CommDev
Cc:Jacqueline Zingsheim Grosser
Subject:Vail PEC Letter Submission
Date:Tuesday, October 7, 2025 1:20:19 PM
Attachments:Vail PEC Letter.pdf
Vail PEC and Greg Roy, Town Planner,
Please see attached for a letter related to the upcoming PEC meeting.
Thanks,
Jacqueline & Jacob Grosser - Altus #306
564
565
From:John Elwaw
To:CommDev
Subject:Apolo development
Date:Tuesday, October 7, 2025 2:12:29 PM
I would like to oppose the new development on the basis that it’s too massive for the area where it is being built.
We need to preserve our environment and limit the amount of construction to preserve the landscape of the area.
Thank you,
Juan Elwaw
Altus owner - 18 G
Sent from my iPhone
566
From:trey.baumgardner@gmail.com
To:CommDev
Subject:Opposed to Lunar Vail/Apollo Park project
Date:Tuesday, October 7, 2025 2:49:05 PM
Dear PEC Board,
I wanted to voice my concern for the mountainous Lunar project that is too big for the property and takes away from
our beautiful community.
Very best,
Trey Baumgardner
830-351-0561
567
From:Teresa Schroeder
To:CommDev
Cc:Todd Mossa
Subject:Opposition to the Lunar Vail / Apollo Park Project as Currently Proposed
Date:Tuesday, October 7, 2025 2:57:29 PM
Importance:High
Dear Members of the Planning and Environmental Commission,
As an owner at The Wren, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the current Lunar
Vail / Apollo Park development proposal.
While I understand and appreciate the need for thoughtful growth and revitalization within
Vail, the current scale and density of this project remain excessive for the property and
surrounding neighborhood. Even after the revisions presented on September 22, the plan still
exceeds reasonable limits — it continues to feel oversized, intrusive, and inconsistent with the
established character of our area.
Our neighborhood, including The Wren, Vail Mountain View Residences, and Altus, shares
deep concern about the lasting impact this project would have on community livability —
including parking congestion, traffic, view corridors, and open-space preservation. The
minimal reduction in gross floor area and building height does little to address these
fundamental issues.
We believe there is an opportunity here for a more balanced approach — one that prioritizes
green space, respects existing zoning guidelines, and better integrates into the fabric of the
neighborhood. I urge the Commission to withhold approval of the current variances and
encourage the development team to present a design that truly aligns with Vail’s planning
principles and community values.
Thank you for your time, for listening to resident concerns, and for your continued
commitment to protecting the integrity of Vail’s environment and character.
Respectfully,
Maria Schroeder
Property Owner, The Wren at Vail
568
From:TOM TYREE
To:CommDev
Subject:Apollo Park Redevelopment Project
Date:Tuesday, October 7, 2025 3:45:45 PM
My name is Tom Tyree and, on behalf of the Tyree family, I am writing in support of the fine
work being done for our community with respect to the Apollo Park redevelopment project.
By way of background, we live in Northwoods on Vail Valley Drive with direct views over
the Ford amphitheater and Apollo Park to the mountainside across the interstate.
We are aware of the coalition of the boards of VMVR, Altus and Wren HOA and many of
their homeowners, which is focused on creating a project that will benefit Vail and the Apollo
Park environs. Like our neighbors, we are opposed to the Apollo Park Redevelopment
Proposal submitted to the Vail Town Council for the 10/13/25 PEC meeting.
Make no mistake - we support responsible development in Vail, and we strongly support the
Alternate Development Proposal submitted by the neighborhood coalition, which is
thoughtful and balanced.
The Apollo Park Redevelopment Proposal is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood
and would have a negative impact on neighbors’ property values and enjoyment. The proposed
redevelopment would also create an unattractive view from I-70, exacerbating the Christmas-
tree-like fiasco of a hundred green exit signs which currently greets westbound travelers as
they approach our town (btw, how did that get approved?). As well, the proposed
redevelopment would impair the peaceful path that follows Gore Creek on the way to the
botanical gardens, Ford Park and the athletic fields. Finally, the proposal as submitted would
impair our viewshed, from the residences south of the park, to the mountainside across the
interstate.
This project application is unique given the massive variances requested by the developer.
It is also unique regarding the developer's unwillingness to adequately respond to feedback
from both PEC members and the neighbors. After receiving significant input during the
9/22/25 meeting that the development was too large, the developer ignored that feedback and
presented a new proposal with an increase in GRFA of 1,693 square feet for consideration at
the 10/13/25 meeting.
The Alternate Development Plan submitted by the neighborhood coalition also includes
variances (albeit more reasonable and consistent), and the PEC may determine that even these
variances are too imposing. In that case, we defer to their judgement. The Alternate
Development Proposal reflects a willingness to accommodate significant and responsible
redevelopment of the site. We hope both the developer and the PEC will be willing to support
this proposal.
We are aware that you have received materials from the neighborhood coalition describing
suggested changes to the developer's 10/13/25 proposal and a comparison of the Alternate
Proposal to the developer’s. Key takeaways from this analysis include:
• The developer's SDD proposed on 10/13/25 is requesting a greater number (6 vs. 4) and
much larger variances (69% vs. 27%) than previously
approved in the most relevant and comparable prior project, SDD #42, creating a new,
569
damaging precedent for future development
• The request for a new above ground site coverage and landscaping variances, where
none were required for SDD #42, is particularly alarming
• The request for a Dwelling Units per Acre variance of 120% of the HDMF
requirement compared to 17% in SDD #42 is egregious.
• The request for a GRFA variance at 163% of the HDF requirement, compared to 76% in
SDD #42, is clearly unfair to the neighbors
• The request for a height variance of 46% is similar to SDD #42, but without the large
number of onsite EHUs at Altus, which represents an overreach with no offsetting
community benefit of reasonable EHU additions.
The Alternate Development proposal still requires variances that significantly exceed the
precedent set for SDD #42, but we are willing to support these higher variances in order to
create a winning proposal for Vail, the neighbors and the developer.
Please consider our comments above in the spirit they are intended - constructive, supportive
of responsible development, and consistent with reasonable past precedents.
We appreciate your consideration of our perspectives. Please feel free to reach out to me with
any questions using the contact information below.
Sincerely, TT
Tom Tyree
303-594-8794
tbtyree@outlook.com
570
From:Justin Astley
To:CommDev
Subject:Lunar Vail
Date:Tuesday, October 7, 2025 4:11:57 PM
Dear Members of the Vail PEC and Mr. Roy,
My name is Justin Astley, and I serve as Vice President of the Altus Homeowners Association
Board. Over the past several weeks, I have worked closely with members of the Vail
Mountain View Residences (VMVR), Altus, and Wren HOA boards—as well as many
concerned homeowners—to form a united coalition opposing the Apollo Park Redevelopment
Proposal scheduled for review at the October 13th PEC Meeting. Our coalition stands firmly
in opposition to this proposal and in support of a more appropriate alternative development
plan that better respects the integrity and character of our neighborhood.
The Apollo Park redevelopment proposal represents an overreach that is fundamentally
incompatible with the surrounding residential community. Its height, density, and scale far
exceed what is reasonable or appropriate for the area, posing serious concerns about property
values, neighborhood character, and quality of life. The requested variances are excessive and
unprecedented, far surpassing those granted for SDD #42 (VMVR and Altus)—the only other
Special Development District approved in this neighborhood.
If approved, this redevelopment would permanently alter the visual landscape of the Gore
Creek corridor. It would replace one of Vail’s most peaceful and scenic pathways—with its
natural connection to the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, Ford Park, and the athletic fields—with
an imposing and unattractive view dominated by oversized structures and insufficient
landscaping. This would be a lasting detriment to residents, visitors, and the broader Vail
community.
We urge the PEC to withhold a positive recommendation for the Apollo Park redevelopment
proposal and instead encourage the pursuit of an alternate development that honors the scale,
spirit, and aesthetic of the neighborhood. Thoughtful development is essential for Vail’s
future, but it must occur with respect for the community’s character and the natural beauty that
makes this area so special.
For additional context and supporting details, I refer you to the letter from Jay Levine,
President of Vail Mountain View Residences, which outlines our coalition’s shared position
and the rationale for our opposition.
Thank you for your time, attention, and commitment to protecting the integrity of our
community.
Sincerely,
Justin Astley
Vice President, Altus HOA Board
--
Justin Astley
571
303-589-2941
572
From:Carlos Gonzalez
To:CommDev
Subject:Apollo Park
Date:Tuesday, October 7, 2025 4:48:28 PM
I am Carlos Gonzalez, owner of two units in VMVR.
I am realy concerned about the development on Apollo Park. As i understand in the meetings with the Neighbor
Coalition, this building is going to be a massive construction that is going to alter the actual
Balance. I call for your responsability, your wisdom for a better future of Vail.Gracias
Enviado desde mi iPhone
573
From:Eric L Eversley
To:CommDev
Cc:tmossa@eastwest.com; Eric L Eversley
Subject:OPPOSITION: LV/Apollo Park Project
Date:Tuesday, October 7, 2025 6:17:42 PM
Dear PEC Board Members,
As a timeshare owner at the Wren (Week 30-Unit 101), I stand in opposition to the above-referenced project. As the
of the owner first floor corner unit closest to the proposed development on the west, my Vail experience will be
irreparably and negatively impacted during construction and in all years following project completion. Obviously,
the noise, dust, access to the Wren during the years of construction are of concern.The attractiveness of my unit for
my personal/family use as an urban experience alternative will be seriously compromised. The Wren will be
squeezed against the Ford Park access road and adjacent open space. This will make staying at the Wren less
desirable. I also expect that the resale value of the unit will be adversely impacted. The scale of the project is
seriously incompatible with the general nature of the area.
On a broader scale, I must express concerns about the environmental impact of such a large increase in the area's
population density. That means more noise pollution, more light pollution, environmental pollution and greater
parking/traffic problems along South Frontage Road, particularly when events are held along the Road, at the
Amphitheater or at the park, The development will bring NO BENEFIT to the quality of life for those of us who
have for decades enjoyed and appreciated The Wren and the unique nature of the surrounding environment.
I am struggling to understand how the proposed project, and the changes it will bring, benefit those who are
currently and have for many years enjoyed Vail and the Vail experience. The area east of Vail Village is, and has
been, a slower-paced, quieter and more open environment than the dynamics of The Village. Both have their place.
I don’t see the value of extending The Village climate to the east. I recognize that the developer references a
number of issue facing the Vail community that their LV/Apollo Park project can help address. This proposed
project (or a slightly modified alternative) may have some seemingly positive, although definitely coincidental,
impact. But, I’m confident that new projects at other locations and much more friendly to the current residents can
be encouraged to address those issues.
I appreciate that you will consider my comments and concerns.
Eric
Eric L. Eversley, Ed.D.
574
From:LBFamilyLP
To:CommDev
Cc:LBFamilyLP
Subject:Opposition to Proposed Apollo Park Redevelopment and Support for Alternate Development Proposal
Date:Tuesday, October 7, 2025 8:06:20 PM
Attachments:WidmierLetter_10.7.2025.pdf
To: Vail Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
Cc: Greg Roy, Town Planner (cdev@vail.gov)
Date: October 7, 2025
From: Lisa Widmier, Owner, Vail Mountain View Residence #302.
Subject: Opposition to Proposed Apollo Park Redevelopment and Support for Alternate
Development Proposal
Dear Members of the Planning and Environmental Commission,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed redevelopment of Apollo Park as
submitted for consideration at the October 13, 2025 PEC meeting. I am a longtime supporter
of thoughtful, sustainable development in Vail, and I believe that maintaining the natural
beauty, livability, and balance of our community is essential to its long-term success.
The current proposal represents a massive overreach in scale and density and is wholly
inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhood and the vision that has guided prior approvals
along Gore Creek. The excessive variances being sought—particularly for height, dwelling
units per acre, gross residential floor area, and site coverage—would result in a structure that
overwhelms adjacent properties and the natural environment. It would fundamentally alter the
character of one of Vail’s most cherished corridors—the serene stretch along Gore Creek
leading to the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, Ford Park, and the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater.
Equally concerning is the developer’s continued disregard of both community and PEC
feedback. Despite repeated requests to reduce the project’s scale, the developer has instead
increased the building’s GRFA, further intensifying an already disproportionate design.
I fully support the attached Alternate Development Proposal put forth by the
VMVR/Altus/Wren neighborhood coalition and described in the letter submitted by Mr. Howard
Willard. While the Alternate Proposal still contemplates significant redevelopment, it does so
in a manner that is more consistent with responsible planning principles, the surrounding built
environment, and the long-term interests of Vail’s residents, visitors, and natural landscape.
I respectfully urge the PEC to deny the developer’s current request and to instead encourage
the parties to collaborate around a solution closer in scope to the Alternate Development
575
Proposal—one that achieves renewal without compromising the integrity and visual harmony
of this important gateway to Vail Village.
Thank you for your time and for your thoughtful stewardship of our community’s future.
Sincerely,
Lisa Widmier
VMVR Owner #302
LAW@lbfamilyLP.com
858-952-4743
576
From:Charise Holcombe
To:CommDev
Subject:Please note RE: Apollo Park
Date:Wednesday, October 8, 2025 7:05:53 AM
To Whom It May Concern:
As a resident of The Wren at Vail for more than 35 years. I wish to express my opinion on the
proposed renovation of Apollo Park, I am very much opposed to this and find the proposed
changes a disgrace as they are very far from meeting the guidelines that have been placed to
protect the beauty of Vail.
Respectfully,
Charise Holcombe
Charise Sent from Gmail Mobile
577
From:Laurie
To:CommDev
Subject:Variances and redevelopment proposed for Apollo Park.
Date:Wednesday, October 8, 2025 9:42:07 AM
Dear PEC,
First, let me say that my family and I have been visiting the Vail area since 1970.
We visit every year from the Denver area and around the country. We have owned our units in The Wren since the
1970’s. We are the visitors that come to Vail, no matter whether your economy is good or bad. We patronize your
businesses during the weeks we visit.
Although we are accustomed to the many changes/updates that have occurred in The VAIL Valley over the
decades, we would like to express our sincere objection to the odious building plans of Apollo Park. The proposed
building plans are too close to The Wren, too high of occupancy and too tall. The current proposal will block all the
sun from The Pool at The Wren.
In closing, I beg you to reconsider rubber stamping a development that hurts its neighbor so much.
Thank you for your consideration,
Laurie Bartee
Lakewood, CO
303-517-3087
578
From:Suzette Hatanaka
To:CommDev
Date:Wednesday, October 8, 2025 11:51:45 AM
To all concerned PEC members,
I applaud your efforts to restrict over development requests of the LV/AP team. I hope they
are able to accept the Vail board members alternative design idea. It seems this will be a
decisive moment in the future of Vail constructions so, I wish the best for you at the PEC; as
you use your power.
Respectfully,
Suzette A. Hatanaka
(Wren Assoc.)
579
From:rockcreek@tesigns
To:CommDev
Subject:Apollo Park/Lunar Vail Development
Date:Wednesday, October 8, 2025 12:12:43 PM
Dear PEC Board,
I just wanted to express my complete dissatisfaction with the proposed redevelopment
of the Apollo Park property. My family has been regularly coming to Vail (all seasons)
since it was founded and to see this kind of occupancy “stuffing” taking place isn’t what
we think is good, or right for Vail, or its visitors. The proposed design is too big and too
tall for the property. Please seriously consider the jointly developed alternative proposal
presented by The Wren, Vail Mountain View Residences and Altus.
Sincerely,
Tim Peck
Boulder/Superior, CO
580
From:Sherri Hynden
To:CommDev
Subject:Apollo Park/Lunar Vail Development
Date:Wednesday, October 8, 2025 1:23:47 PM
Dear TOV PEC,
We are writing to object to the current Lunar Vail Development Plan. Even though the design was “cut back” from
the original, the changes were minimal. The plan still involves several large variances and leaves us with an
overdeveloped property for the location. It is simply too large and dense for that location. It isn’t in line with the
TOV MASTER PLAN. They are asking for too many variances.
We encourage you, as the PEC, to stand firm on your review and consideration of this redevelopment plan and reject
it in its current form.
We are in agreement that the Apollo Park needs to be redeveloped, but we would like to see a plan that fits in with
the look and feel of Vail Village. This is not Lionshead or other areas that allow such over-construction. This is
Vail Village.
We have been vacationing here for 25 years and have been whole unit owners at the Wren since 2016.
We thank you for your service on the PEC. We encourage you to reject this project as it is and require more “cut
backs” in the height and density as well as larger setbacks and more landscaping to stay on line with the beautiful
Vail Village we’ve come to know and love.
Thank you and kind regards,
Eric and Sherri Hynden
581
From:Beerbower, David C
To:CommDev
Cc:karensbeerbower@gmail.com; ryan.beerbower@outlook.com; "Nolan Beerbower"
Subject:Lunar Vail/Apollo Park redevelopment
Date:Wednesday, October 8, 2025 2:08:10 PM
Dear Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission,
As a current owner of winter and summer interval weeks at Apollo Park since 1982, our family
is in support of the requested variances to code sought by Lunar Vail and Apollo Park HOA as
presented in Ruther Associates’ submittal for Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park .
Specifically, we encourage you to approve the roof ridge height of 8,250 feet for Apollo Park to
match the west-adjacent Vail Mountain View Residences (where Apollo Park buildings C and D
stood until 2007).
The 50-year-0ld Apollo Park buildings A and B need to be replaced to comply with fire code and
to maintain long-term interval ownership. The proposed project will serve to replace existing
surface paved parking with a parking garage and ensure Apollo Park’s continued financial
contribution to the East Village neighborhood. I think we all can agree that five- to six-story
structures are appropriate to frame Vail Village and provide an I-70 noise and visual barrier.
Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to the Town of Vail’s approval of Ruther
Associates’ submittal.
David & Karen Beerbower
896 Cranes Court, Maitland, FL 32751
321-279-5538
(owners of intervals in A309, A310 and B104 at Apollo Park)
Terracon provides environmental, facilities, geotechnical, and materials consulting engineering services
delivered with responsiveness, resourcefulness, and reliability.
Private and confidential as detailed here (www.terracon.com/disclaimer). If you cannot access the
hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
582
From:Greg Roy
To:Steph Johnson
Subject:FW: RE:Apollo Park
Date:Wednesday, October 8, 2025 4:54:12 PM
Attachments:image001.png
For Lunar Park public comment.
Greg Roy, AICP
Planning Manager
Community Development Department
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Office: 970.477.3459
groy@vail.gov
vail.gov
From: Charise Holcombe <holcombe.charise@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 7:06 AM
To: Greg Roy <groy@vail.gov>
Subject: RE:Apollo Park
To Whom It May Concern:
As a resident of The Wren at Vail for more than 35 years. I wish to express my
opinion on the proposed renovation of Apollo Park, I am very much opposed to this
and find the proposed changes a disgrace as they are very far from meeting the
guidelines that have been placed to protect the beauty of Vail.
Respectfully,
Charise Holcombe
583
Charise Sent from Gmail Mobile
584
From:Pat Mages
To:CommDev
Subject:Apollo Park Lunar Vail Development
Date:Wednesday, October 8, 2025 4:37:22 PM
To PEC Members,
I have lived in communities that have given variances for developers, which turned into
granting variances to future developments. The result was a change of culture and ambiance of
the community, a distrust of city officials, and then having to deal with increased traffic and
parking. Please stick with the master plan, and keep Vail as Vail Village. Of course,
developers squeeze more square footage in their project with no consideration for the long
term effect, and city officials have an eye on increased tax revenue. These issues should be
voted on by the citizens, even though city officials were put in charge by the voters.
Thank You for allowing me to be heard,
Louis H. Mages
Vail Property Owner since 1978
585
From:Gregory Young, M.D.
To:CommDev
Subject:Apollo park
Date:Wednesday, October 8, 2025 5:51:59 PM
To Whom it May Concern,
As a lifelong visitor (since 1974) of Vail, I have seen the town grow immensely.
Most all of the changes have continued the feel of a welcoming village.
Every time our friends visit they are truly amazed at the town.
My family has grown up skiing at Vail since my mom 1st took us here in 1974.
We now have a 4th generation of Vail skiers .
As an owner of 5 winter weeks at the Wren we have a good perspective of the town from
the east end.
We have always thought that the Appollo Park time shares (as well as the Wren) could
use an upgrade.
I encourage you to approve the alternate plan as suggested by the Wren.
Thank you for your consideration.
Greg Young
586
From:Jaime Sahags
To:CommDev
Subject:The development project for Apollo Park
Date:Wednesday, October 8, 2025 10:55:27 PM
Hello, I managed to attend the first meeting that OPC held on Sept. 8th regarding The
Apollo Park project. I am a timeshare owner of unit 305–36 at The Wren
condominium. This letter is meant to express my opposition to this project. It is too
big, too dense and covers too much of the property. And finally it does not include
enough landscaping.
I strongly suggest that a new project contemplating these issues should be made.
Jaime Sahagún
587
From:Adriana Fernandez
To:CommDev
Subject:About the project beside The Wren
Date:Thursday, October 9, 2025 12:00:13 AM
Hello,
This message is just to let you know that me Adriana Fernandez owner of one of the weeks at The Wren, totally
disagree on the project that is looking for aproval to build right beside us with so many floors and SURPASS the
limits that you have established… why even listen to such a big proposal? Their plans on that project is huge! I
cannot agree with that. I hope you can listen to our worries.
Thanks!
Lic Adriana Fernández T
588
From:Edith Kottenstette
To:CommDev
Cc:Gene Kottenstette; The Wren @vail Todd Mossa
Subject:Apollo construction
Date:Thursday, October 9, 2025 1:21:20 PM
Good afternoon
As a multiple weekly unit owner at the Wren, I have read online documents pertaining to the impending decision for
The Apollo redesign and expansion.
I have several concerns for which I failed to find answers for in the documentation. Please help me obtain this
information:
How will the high quality of Gore Creek be regularly maintained? Will a treatment facility be conveniently located
for consistent maintenance? What part of the Vail Strategic plan relates to Gore Creek and/or does it have a separate
plan?
Gore Creek is the lifeblood of Vail and the quality and maintenance needs to be of high importance.
There is a small entry in the online proposed construction document pertaining to the housing for Vail residents and
workers, as part of the Apollo. Does this minimal % satisfy any town, county, or state requirements?
Has there been a traffic pattern study/ report created for Frontage Road? How will the air quality be impacted?
Have the principals of the Gerald and Betty Ford gardens been consulted regarding the impact of the new levels of
air quality on local vegetation? The gardens have an impact on the esthetics of Vail as well as visitor interest.
Will there be consistent dust mitigation during the construction and how?
Has the Apollo project team asked for an environmental study to clarify the impact of the construction and future on
Vail.
Any and all assistance you can help me with before the meeting Monday will be greatly appreciated.
Respectfully
Edith Kottenstette (Mrs. Eugene)
CC:Eugene
Todd Mossa, The Wren
589
From:Mark Caplan
To:CommDev
Cc:Laura Willard (lamwill@aol.com); Mark Caplan
Subject:Apollo Park Redevelopment
Date:Friday, October 10, 2025 4:35:43 AM
My wife Linda and I are owners of Unit #306 at Vail Mt View Residences. We are an end of
group unit on the East side and directly look at the Apollo Park Community. We would be
directly( and negatively) impacted by the massive scale of the proposed redevelopment.
We are opposed to the developers plan not only as originally presented but also with the
current minor “tweaks” minimally responsive to neighborhood opposition and still
requesting massive variances. Howard Willard has put forth a proposal that is more than
reasonable. Some of us felt we should just say no, others thought we should start out
even more limited and negotiate to this place. Ultimately, he was persuasive that making
a fair and reasonable counterproposal with what we could live with was our best option.
Pls adopt the suggestions as proposed. It is much more in context with what is most
beneficial to the long-term future of the Vail Valley. Respectfully, Mark Caplan
590
From:Loren Gunderson
To:CommDev
Date:Friday, October 10, 2025 10:43:56 AM
As a two week owner at the Wren, I stand opposed to the Appollo project as proposed. Vail
stands to lose its soul if a cascade of this, and similar projects follow.
591
From:RMB
To:CommDev
Subject:Objection to Apollo/Lunar Vail redevelopment
Date:Friday, October 10, 2025 3:21:21 PM
We write again to express our continued objection to the proposed and now modified Apollo/Lunar Vail
redevelopment. Although slightly reduced in scope, the structures described in the modified proposal remain too
massive and too tall for the site. The developers need to redo their proposal, this time making an attempt to see how
close they can come to meeting Town of Vail code requirements rather than seeing how far they can push for
outlandish variances. Their time and effort could be spent productively by considering the alternate proposal
presented by several others in the comments submitted for this meeting.
Bob and Addie Barkley
The Wren at Vail
Weeks 35 and 47
592
From:slanschuetz@gmail.com
To:CommDev
Subject:Apollo Park
Date:Saturday, October 11, 2025 3:27:58 PM
As a property, owner and neighbor of Apollo Park, I am contacting you again to voice my concerns
and objections to the revised development proposal for Apollo Park.
While the revised plans result in a slightly less imposing structure they are still asking for extreme
variances – which makes my case for me. The building does NOT conform to the neighborhood and
would degrade the appearance of the entire neighborhood.
Once again, I understand new development in Vail will continue – and I benefit from that overall.
However, I do hope the committee will scale back what they deem permissible for this proposed
structure to be less overwhelming and less of a blight on that area.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sara Anschuetz
The Wren, # 405
593
From:KEN/BARBARA MALONEY/PALERMO
To:CommDev
Subject:Lunar Vail Plans
Date:Monday, October 13, 2025 12:20:16 PM
Hello,
I own a condo at The Wren and am strongly suggesting that the proposed buildings
are still too big for the size of the property.
The pool location is a big concern as it will be in a canyon created by the two
buildings - the noise emanating from the pool will be magnified and a big nuisance to
all neighbors and to the Appolo Park and Lunar Vail residences facing it- just like the
noise from I 70 travels up the mountain walls. It is a recipe for disaster .
Thank you.
Barbara Palermo
.
594
From:Lora Dettinger
To:CommDev
Cc:David C
Subject:Lunar Vail Development -- Letter in Opposition
Date:Monday, October 13, 2025 12:36:54 PM
Town of Vail Planning Commission:
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Lunar Vail Development. As
currently envisioned, the sheer mass and scale of the project would significantly disrupt the
quality of life for residents in what is currently a peaceful, community-oriented neighborhood.
My partner and I are the owners of Unit N at Altus. We are not opposed to development next
door—in fact, we would welcome a reasonably sized building that complements the character
and density of the area. However, the current Lunar Vail proposal is deeply out of scale. At
three times the size of the Altus building and with 75 units planned, the project would place an
enormous and unsustainable burden on existing infrastructure and community resources.
Among our concerns are:
Traffic and Safety: A development of this magnitude would significantly increase
vehicle traffic on already narrow and residential streets, raising safety concerns for
pedestrians, cyclists, and families.
Parking Strain: With limited available parking in the area already, it is unclear how 75
new units will be adequately accommodated, especially because adequate off-street
parking is not provided.
Community Character: The mass of the proposed development would overshadow
surrounding buildings, blocking natural light and altering the visual and social fabric of
the neighborhood.
Environmental Impact: The project’s density may have environmental implications,
from stormwater runoff to disruption of local green space, which have not been
addressed transparently.
Development should be thoughtful, balanced, and aligned with the long-term vision of the
community it inhabits. Unfortunately, the current proposal for Lunar Vail feels rushed, overly
ambitious, and insensitive to its immediate surroundings. I urge decision-makers to reject this
plan in its current form and encourage the developers to return with a more proportionate,
community-focused proposal.
Thank you for your attention and consideration.
David Chmielecki and Lora Dettinger
Owners, Unit N at Altus Vail
595
Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes
Monday, October 13, 2025
1:00 PM
Vail Town Council Chambers
Present: Robyn Smith
John Rediker
Brad Hagedorn
William A Jensen
Robert N Lipnick
Absent: Craig H Lintner Jr
David N Tucker
1. Virtual Link
Register to attend the Planning and Environmental Commission meeting. Once registered,
you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining this webinar.
2. Call to Order
3. Worksession
4. Main Agenda
4.1 A request for recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 3-2 -6A,
Function, Vail Town Code, to amend Conceptual Building Height Plan of the Vail
Village Master Plan. (PEC25-0025)
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC represented by Ruther Associates LLC
Time: 5 min
PEC25-0025 - Staff Memo.pdf
Attachment A. Applicant Narrative
Smith discloses she has accepted job with the Vail Housing department but she hasn’t started yet,
and has no financial interest or conflict of interest with the application.
Planner Roy gives a presentation on the application to amend the conceptual building height plan. He
talks about the plan and adjacent context and heights in the area. Staff found the application did not
meet the criteria and is therefore recommending the PEC forward a recommendation of denial.
Smith, is the Wren five or six stories straight up from the path? Will there be a step in that
potential redevelopment as well?
Roy, this is a guiding document, just because the upper limit is there doesn’t mean
appropriate development to a specific area.
The applicant is represented by George Ruther with Ruther Associates, and Ron Byrne and
Dave Zessin, president of Apollo Park HOA.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of October 13, 2025
1
596
Ruther is surprised by Staff’s recommendation, we read the same document and came up with
something different. In the criteria, it is applicant’s responsibility to show at least one of those
conditions is met, we think we meet all three.
Ruther gives a presentation addressing the three criteria. He talks about the graphic of view
corridors and conceptual heights on the frontage road. Ruther talks about the proposal in relation
to the conceptual building heights in the master plan. The proposal is four stories of building on the
north façade, an additional story on the south façade.
Rediker and Ruther discuss the graphic showing the number of stories on the north, central,
and southern portion of the site.
Hagedorn, why do you need to amend the plan if you’re presenting a four-story building currently?
Ruther thought was the appropriate thing to cover all the bases, but in hindsight has seen how many
large projects were approved without a master plan amendment. It’s the right thing to do from a
planner’s perspective.
Rediker, how much is great than four stories?
Ruther, the north, east, and west facades are four, on the south it gets up to 6 because of the way
the grade drops offs.
Rediker, the bottom story is a lower grade than the Wren and VMVR?
Ruther says yes, about eight feet lower. We didn’t want to go forward with flat roofs, that would
have helped with height, but believed it was out of character with the neighborhood. The grade
was significantly altered on the south side of the building at VMVR
Zessin says there wasn’t a picture of Apollo Park. The current Building B is a five -story tall building, can’t
see the base from the creek path. We’re planning to pull this back from the creek over current conditions.
Rediker asks for public comment regarding Item 4.1.
Howard Willard lives in VMVR. It’s important to note VMVR is 48’, four stories plus attic. Apollo Park
is asking for 64 feet and six stories. You can’t rely on imaginary future changes at the Wren, you
have to look at the site. The only other SDD in the neighborhood is VMVR at 48 feet, Altus is 70
feet but was 50% onsite EHUs.
Eugene Kottenstette, owner at the Wren. Surprised how close the Apollo property is to the creek,
have a hard time believing the new building won’t be bigger than the existing.
Dan Wolfe is in VMVR building. The applicant has cited the odd shape of the lot on several occasions,
as a reason for variances. Questions whether it is the Town’s responsibility to solve their problems, he
is against approving this notion.
Michael Dardick, an owner in VMVR. Opposes this application, the height is excessive. This
developer didn’t collaborate one bit on something that would fit in this site.
Craig Carty, an owner at the Wren. Agrees with the last two speakers, opposed to the redevelopment
as presented today. We would welcome the project if it fit the scale of the lot and neighborhood. Sent
pictures of Apollo Park today, it is three stories tall. The proposal is to go to six stories in the middle.
The new building is also massive; the density is too much for this small neighborhood. Also concerned
about pay in lieu, which is part of this development, the Town needs to look at this.
Jennifer Wiler and David Fintak, owners at the Wren. Echoes previous comments, strongly recommend
that PEC supports recommendation of Staff in denying proposal. A double-digit increase in height is
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of October 13, 2025
2
597
inappropriate. The rational to justify this is based on future development, there are no
current redevelopment plans for the Wrens. Thanks staff for thoughtful presentation.
Laurie Roshak, owner at the Wren. Opposes this proposal for same reasons as previous speakers.
No further comment, public comment closed.
Jensen, no questions. Not supportive of this request because of height and relationship to
adjacent properties is out of character.
Lipnick, the massing, bulk, height of 70’ is too high. Doesn’t think it fits with the neighborhood.
Hagedorn, within context of master plan not comfortable with the changes. Doesn’t see the plan in
error, some verbiage talks about lower height along Gore Creek, the primary change is SDD 42. That
has increased height along frontage road which we have, when SDD 42 was approved it had a 48’
height limit, for those reasons not comfortable with a change to the master plan.
Smith, we’re a recommending body on the SDD. Procedurally, amending the master plan is the
correct thing to do, although it may be hasn’t always been done. Given this amendment is not
necessary to achieve additional height or stories, the amendment is not necessary to achieve the
end objective the application is looking for. In 2008 we looked at height based on stories; we’re still
having that conversation today. My vote wouldn’t necessarily matter, but there is a lot of reasons to
update the master plan. Conditions have changed. You could change it, but it’s not necessary to
achieve the end result that the applicant is looking for with this application. This master plan has to
be updated at some point to reflect the current conditions.
Rediker, looking at the three criteria; doesn’t see any error in the plan when looking at it literally.
Understands the applicant’s argument when taking into consideration the scale of other buildings.
We’re not looking at conditions changing throughout Town but rather around this site or immediate
area. The applicant is presenting a façade that is four stories, the area of concern is the rear along
Gore Creek. The height plan section on pg. 22, talks about the goal to maintain concentration of low
scale buildings in core area areas larger buildings along the northern periphery. This comes down to
difference in interpretation between me and applicant, applicant says you can have 5-6 story building
here. What the Town is trying to achieve in the plan is putting larger components against the Frontage
Road and then scaling back towards Gore Creek. Amending the plan to allow 5-6 stories on the south
of that lot does conflict with that criterion. Nothing has changed, we still want a 3-4 story height along
Gore Creek. Many of the comparisons used were on the Frontage Road and not Gore Creek.
Robert N Lipnick made a motion to forward a recommendation of denial with the findings on page
9; Brad Hagedorn seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0).
4.2 A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of a
new Special Development District, pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development
Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a multi-family project,
located at 442 South Frontage Road East/ Vail Village Filing 5, Tract D. (PEC25-0026)
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC represented by Ruther Associates LLC
Time: 120 min.
PEC25-0026 & PEC25-0024 Staff Memo.pdf
Attachment A. Vicinity Map.pdf
Attachment B. Applicant Narrative.pdf
Attachment C. Lunar Park Traffic Assessment 7-17-
25.pdf Attachment D. Lunar Park - EIR - 7-23-25.pdf
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of October 13, 2025
3
598
Attachment E. PEC25-0026 Documents.pdf
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans Part1.pdf
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans Part2.pdf
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans Part3.pdf
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans Part4.pdf
Attachment G. 9-8-25 PEC Results.pdf
Attachment H. PEC Results 9-22-25.pdf
Attachment I. Letter from Vail AIPP.pdf
Attachment J. Employee Housing Plan.pdf
Attachment K. Housing Department Comments.pdf
Attachment L. Public Comment.pdf
Timestamp 1:19:25 Planner Roy gives a presentation. He touches on the criteria. He compares
the proposed development standards with existing in the area. He talks about landscaping and
potential impacts to the ROW.
Smith, do we believe special deed restrictions is a good idea?
Anna Bengston, with the Vail Housing Department, says we would want to see more details on it,
how does it meet Town housing goals?
The applicant is represented by George Ruther with Ruther Associates. He talks about public comment
received, they intend to make revisions between this meeting and presenting to Town Council. He talks
about the plan revisions, reduction in height, reductions in bulk mass/scale, increased step back on north
façade, further increase in west side setback, reduction in units and GRFA, increase in EHUs on site.
Rediker, can you clarify point in regard to emergency vehicle access?
Ruther, there is less room for landscaping with the emergency access requirements, the Town
might want to consider amendments to landscaping requirements.
Ruther talks about the SDD criteria. There are instances where some of the criteria may not be
applicable or a practical solution is available. Ruther provides an analysis of the review criteria.
Ruther goes through comparative height analysis with neighboring properties.
Hagedorn asks if this height graphic looks at existing and finished grade measurements.
Ruther says it would look different, they used existing grade for the graphic to provide a
comparative analysis. There are places where VMVR is 55 feet. As a reference, the ridge height is
the same, two levels are masked by grade on the sides.
Hagedorn would call last story a half story, VMVR is presenting 3.5 to 4.5 stories? Ruther confirms.
Ruther talks about parking and loading on the site. The building today doesn’t comply with setbacks,
that will be pulled back to comply with setbacks.
Ruther talks about the proposed public benefits of the project.
Ron Byrne, of the applicant team, thanks PEC. They appreciate the process, there have been a lot of
meetings. He has been trying to develop this property for a long time, thanks the board at Apollo
Park. This is an opportunity to do something with an infill site that benefits the Town and the site. The
owners have been coming here for 60 years. This project is keeping the people on the site. We have
tried to be sensitive to listening to what neighbors have said. Praises Mr. Ruther, he is skilled at
bringing together all the necessary components.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of October 13, 2025
4
599
Dave Zessin, Apollo Park HOA president, lets have some focus on the people that are at Apollo Park.
They have been there a long time. Doing something like this is what allows us to protect our future. We’re
a benefit to the local business owners, we have interval owners from other places, who are attempting to
purchase after they visit us. We’re here today because people want to stay. Our buildings is aging, this is
a way we can upgrade. The Town has identified it as a property to be redeveloped. We can continue this
multi-generational place to stay, excited about EHUs onsite and off.
Rediker, the newest iteration is eight EHUs onsite?
Ruther confirms. All eight are in the north building.
Conversation about Res. 34 from 2023, PEC asks what type of deed restrictions are you proposing?
Ruther, it will vary. We have an expectation to provide onsite; Apollo Park also needs onsite managers.
Rediker, in terms of Housing, housing affordability was brought up. How does PEC ensure
affordability is achieved?
Roy says it could be included in a condition.
Smith asks about 100% housing requirement in the Vail Village master plan area. Ruther, outside
of Sebastian not aware of other completely onsite employee housing in Vail Village.
Smith, this affordability component would be novel in this instance?
Ruther believes it would be new for Vail.
Smith, is there any way that you could put more employee housing onsite?
Ruther, it comes down to the economics of the proposal. We’re aligned to do the most we can do
for affordable housing with what we have.
Lipnick asks about an affordability table.
Roy, that was out of the staff report for that resolution. It references that rent payments or
mortgage payments should max out at 30% of monthly income.
Smith discuss opportunity to collaborate with AIPP for public benefit.
Smith, the Wren does not want landscaping on their site?
Ruther, we had discussed opportunities with them. We proposed a shared emergency access easement
along that shared property line. We haven’t heard back if there’s value to that or shared landscaping.
Smith and Ruther discuss path along the south of the site.
Rediker, the master plan (9-1) talks about this sub-area, including a substantial landscape buffer.
Ruther, there are easements on the front of the site which impact what landscaping could be done in
this area.
Rediker asks about 2.3, are there going to be live/hot beds?
Ruther mentions the timeshares and they have a handful of attached accommodation units.
Rediker, the plans accommodate parking, etc for those people to visit? Ruther confirms.
Rediker asks for public comment.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of October 13, 2025
5
600
Andrew (inaudible), resident at VMVR. Doesn’t believe the neighbors have been listened to. The high
densities force the massing towards Gore Creek away from the Frontage Road. The development will
impact views and landscaping around VMVR. This is six stories above Gore Creek. The EIR is silent
on the carbon footprint of the project. Supports staff’s recommendation of denial.
Todd Mossa, GM at the Wren. We don’t have plans for redevelopment at the moment. There is a
water main underneath where the trees are proposed which creates complications, we’d have to take
over maintenance of a main. The access easement would require us to give up the eight feet of
green space used for snow storage. Personally, applaud applicants to try and accommodate
requests and feedback. While they went through effort to put eight EHUs in there, look at what went
on at Altus with their units and the troubles there.
Lisa Widmeir, owner at VMVR. Wants to know more about how the timeshare owners will
be incorporated into the redevelopment.
Eugene Kottenstette, owner in the Wren. Supports Mossa’s comments. Compliments applicants with
the presentation, appreciates what they’re trying to do to get things done. Glad to see a setback of 20’
instead of five feet and contribution to the creek, glad efforts are being made for employee housing.
Jay Levine, president of VMVR HOA. The mass, the scale, the height, the setbacks are not compatible
with neighborhood, and the request for an SDD should be denied. Virtually everyone in the
neighborhood opposes this proposal for a SDD, which asks for nearly triple the GRFA. The proposed
50 to 70 western wall creates a canyon for our existing amenities. The applicants have listened but
have returned to the PEC with minimal changes. We have an alternate proposal concept, with more
modest requests. We are urging the PEC to deny this request.
Debra Charles, unit owner at the Wren. Opposes this proposal which is oversized. Supports a smaller
development. They have been told at previous meetings that the project needs to be reduced and that
hasn’t happened. The developer is requesting to almost double the number of units on the same size
lot. Where does Fire Free Five come into play? PEC should require this to be reduced in scale and
have the proper landscaping.
Craig Carty, owner at the Wren. Endorses comments by Levine and Charles. The Wren has a lot of
landscaping if you take the right type of pictures. On the west side of the Wren are conifer and aspen
trees. The GRFA is well over what is allowed, that’s why they’re requesting these deviations. Hope
you vote no.
Caryn Clayman, owner at VMVR. It’s disingenuous that Ron Byrne makes himself out to be the savior.
They keep talking negatively about the way VMVR was built and he was the developer there. We need
to look at what happened in the past. This is overdevelopment, they haven’t done anything to show
that they are being reasonable. Supports what has been said, does not support proposal.
Michael Dardick, owner at VMVR. There has been no collaboration or negotiation to do something
that works for neighborhood and city. The applicant suggested no neighbor wants this to happen; we
do but in a responsible way. Why are we here with this problem of greater mass and height, it is just
money for the developer. The idea that the configuration of the site is the problem is not accurate.
Dan Wolfe, echoes Dardick. Scale and density does not fit, there is a lack of landscaping. Agrees
with Levine and Charles, requests you do not pass this proposal.
Lora Dettinger, agrees and supports denial.
Arie Behar, there are criteria that need to be met for these deviations, including public benefit. When
you have buildings overshadowing neighbors that is not a benefit. He is an owner at the Wren, would
be impacted by proposal. Requests PEC to deny application.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of October 13, 2025
6
601
David C, owner at Altus. Agrees with Levine, requests PEC to deny.
Howard Willard, owner at VMVR. The PEC should deny this proposal. We favor the redevelopment
of Apollo Park, if it is done the right way. Through public comment we submitted an alternate
redevelopment proposal, making some appropriate changes. Willard details the changes in their
alternate proposal. These measures would create a project with smaller variances in height,
density, GRFA, but still greater than what the neighbors developed.
Louise Todd is an Apollo Park owner since 1979. The Apollo park owners did show up today and
there are owners following this every single meeting.
No further comment, public comment closed.
Smith, up or down this is going to go to Council. We’re a recommending body. Agrees that it fails to
meet criteria 1 and 2 in conjunction with proximity to Gore Creek on the south face. The North building
is acceptable. With the Wren in it’s current form, there are a lot of things that would not be built today.
Smith’s primary concern is on 40% slope and the height and mass. This fails to meet criteria 6, right
where it bow out and is tall is the issue. The development is following their property line, it would be
beneficial to maintain the existing grade if their property line wasn’t that shape. There would be a
public interest in pushing it back on the bow. It’s reasonable to assume that building won’t age as well
because it is a timeshare structure. It’s commendable you have gotten this far. We have regulated
ourselves out of street trees, and the expectation for landscaping doesn’t match civic and fire
expectations, which is not unique to this property or a failure of the applicant.
Smith, regarding housing plan, it would be inconsistent with 12 -26- A, code expects actual units.
That’s the letter but understands that the expectation has changed. If the Council decides to take the
money, spend it as quickly as possible. Doesn’t believe the master plan policy language is intended
to create a requirement for 100% onsite EHUs. The proposal for specialized EHUs is innovative but
doesn’t think that policy exists, wouldn’t be appropriate as a condition. The EIR is acceptable, shared
fire access with Wren would be beneficial as well as shared landscaping but not something we can
impose. Exceeding density and GRFA are not insurmountable deviations, but the public benefit
needs to be defined and accepted by Council. Concurs that it meets criteria 3,5,7,9.
Hagedorn, as currently drawn, agrees with Smith’s take on criteria. His target has never moved, that was
his comment during the work session. This needs a large public benefit commensurate with the ask, don’t
believe we’re there. Talks about the history of Altus, the EHUs onsite were a benefit to counteract the ask.
Currently we’re at 1:4 EHU/DU rate compared to Altus which was 1:1. Getting comfortable with north
building as I said last meeting. The south buildings are still primarily an issue. There hasn’t been a big shift
on height, there are one or two points that actually went up. There’s a lot of focus on the north façade of
south building, but the public would see six stories on the south side of the building. In terms of what was
built at VMVR, that’s an issues of enforcement, that’s not something we consider as a commission now.
Disagrees with staff, doesn’t see the sunshade as anything different than Altus. On housing affordability,
sees no way that that concept can be brought in, if we’re going to go down that route we need to talk
changes to Title 12. If we want to make changes, let’s make it consistent, don’t think it’s appropriate here,
we need to be consistent and clear, put it in Title 12. In terms of emergency access, the codes change and
the plans need to change, don’t see that as mitigating for landscaping.
Lipnick, looked at review criteria, the proposed mass, scale and height do not meet the criteria. The
GRFA exceeds the appropriate amount of development for this site. Appreciates the Fire Department
recommendations and we all have to deal with that. The first three criteria are met, but the height is
not. The proposed plan is for six stories rather than four so doesn’t think the criteria are met.
Jensen, thanks Smith and Hagedorn for articulate messaging. Regarding the height, unit density,
GRFA, if this project was smaller the variances needed for it to come to a reality can be achieved.
Given where we sit right now, agrees with staff recommendation to deny.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of October 13, 2025
7
602
Rediker, looking at relationship to surrounding structures, it is clearly too big. The south building at five
to six stories doesn’t mesh with the master plan and context of neighboring properties. Would have
liked to see a shorter building at four stories, that step back from the creek. There is eventually going
to be a much bigger building on this site than what is there. What is appropriate is going shorter
towards the creek at four stories. The master plan clearly talks about stepping back from the frontage
rood. The landscaping along the frontage road is about as good as you can get with the limitations
there. Affordability is an issue, it’s in the master plan. Right now we don’t have anything concrete with
the application for the SDD, we don’t have a proposal to ensure affordability and availability for
workforce. That was a problem with Altus and we don’t want to repeat it. Commend applicants for their
employee housing but needs that to be looked at the next level of review. Thanks public comment and
applicant team.
Robert N Lipnick made a motion to forward a recommendation of denial with the findings on page
18; Brad Hagedorn seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0).
4.3 A request for review of a Conditional Use Permit amendment, pursuant to Section 12-6H-
3 Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, in accordance with Title 12, Chapter 16, Conditional
Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow for timeshare units, located at Located at 442
South Frontage Road East/ Vail Village Filing 5, Tract D. (PEC25-0024) See item 4.2 for staff report and attachments
Planner: Greg Roy
Applicant Name: Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC represented by Ruther Associates LLC
Time: 5 min
Brad Hagedorn made a motion to Table to the meeting on Nov. 10th; Robyn Smith seconded the
motion Passed (5 - 0).
4.4 A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary
amendment, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for the
rezoning of 16 Vail Road, Vail Village Filing 1, Lots M & O, also known as Vail Village
Inn Phase IV, from the Public Accommodation (PA) Zone District to the Vaill Village
Inn (VVI) Zone District. (PEC25-0032)
Planner: Heather Knight
Applicant Name: Ferruco Vail Ventures LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group
Time: 45 min.
PEC25-0032 Staff Memo.pdf
Attachment A. Vail Village Filing 1 Block 5D Lots M-N-O - Sebastian - Vicinity
Map.pdf Attachment B. PEC25-0032 Applicant Narrative.pdf
Attachment C. PEC25-0032 Title and Existing Plans.pdf
Attachment D. Ordinance No.15 Series of 2025.pdf
Timestamp: 4:24:00 Planner Knight gives a presentation. She touches on the history of the area and
the zoning standards. She goes through the review the criteria, staff finds it is meeting the criteria and
is recommending approval.
The applicant is represented by Dominic Mauriello with Mauriello Planning Group.
Hagedorn, what is the motivation here?
Mauriello, because of the SDD going away, we could stay in PA zoning but this district was created
for this area. This district has more flexible landscaping standards built in.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of October 13, 2025
8
603
Jensen, how is the HOA looking at this?
Mauriello, they are separate HOAs but do have some internal overlap. This will make it have
consistent zoning, won’t necessarily change relationship between properties.
Public comment opened, no comment, public comment closed.
Smith agrees criteria are met.
Hagedorn agrees conditions are met. It came down to dimensional standards, bringing setbacks in line.
The height is the same, the density is a give here but density is not always a driver of mass and bulk.
Good to bring in line with this zone district that was crafted for this area.
Lipnick feels the criteria are met, is in favor.
Jensen echoes comments, criteria and conditions are met.
Rediker agrees, looking at the standards, this is non-conforming significantly, now everything will comply.
Agrees with findings.
Brad Hagedorn made a motion to Recommend for approval with the findings on page 12; Robyn
Smith seconded the motion Passed (5 - 0).
4.5 A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulations
amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Article 7B: Commercial Core 1 (CC1)
District; Article 7C: Commercial Core 2 (CC2) Zone District; Article 7H: Lionshead Mixed
Use 1 (LMU-1) Zone District; and, Article 7I: Lionshead Mixed Use 2 (LMU-2) Zone
District, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendments, Vail Town Code, to add language
regarding conversions of existing eating and drinking establishments. (PEC25-0034)
Planner: Heather Knight
Applicant Name: Town of Vail, represented by Matt Gennett
Time: 30 min.
PEC25-0034_Staff_Memo.pdf
PEC25-0034 Attachment A.pdf
Brad Hagedorn made a motion to Table to the meeting on Oct. 27th; Robyn Smith seconded the
motion Passed (4 - 0).
4.6 A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 3 -2-6A,
Function, Vail Town Code, to add a subarea site specific section and associated
language for the Red Lion Building to the Vail Village Master Plan (PEC-25-0029)
Planner: Matt Gennett
Applicant Name: Red Lion Building, LLC represented by George Ruther of Ruther Associates LLC
Time: 30 min.
PEC25-0029 Staff Memo.pdf
101325 Vail Village Master Plan Amendment - Red Lion Building.pdf
Timestamp: 4:41:50 Community Development Director Matt Gennett gives a presentation. He touches
on the proposal and the relevant Town plans. He walks through the review criteria; staff finds it meets
the criteria and is recommending the commission forward a recommendation of approval.
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of October 13, 2025
9
604
The applicant is represented by George Ruther with Ruther Associates. Ruther gives a presentation.
Scott Redner owns the Shakedown bar. Their business continues to grow, they have been interested
in expanding. Talks about the opportunities for expanding music shows and food options.
Rediker doesn’t disagree with the goals here. References the proposed language about the Town
collaborating with the Red Lion to allow patios to expand into the right of way. Concerned about getting
so specific about addressing one specific property in a master plan. Why is this language here?
Ruther, it is should not shall, this is an advisory document not a regulatory document. The though is that if
this is about maintaining vibrancy, maybe the Town should participate as well with the resources it has.
Gennett talks about the existing outdoor patio on the western elevation of the Red Lion.
Rediker talks about some of the pedestrian traffic challenges in this area. Wants to be careful
about mandatory language in here especially for one specific property.
The expansion should be explored or considered, Gennett and Rediker discuss possible changes
such as the expansion should be explored or considered.
Smith, does outdoor patios count towards no-net loss commercial? Gennett say no.
Rod Littlefelder, representing the ownership group of Red Lion restaurant. Commends PEC on the
work you do. He has received a lot of public input that Vail would not be Vail without the Red Lion. It is
the longest running business establishment in Vail. The building needs redevelopment, but whatever
you do, do not let the Red Lion leave street level.
Dana Tang, owns two residential units in Red Lion, they have been in Vail village since 1970. Agree
that Vail should have dining and entertainment and nightlife in the village and supports that, but a
master plan should include all aspects of planning for the village. The master plan should plan for a
copacetic and happy relationship between commercial and residential. It’s a little bit short-sighted and
limited to have writing all about vibrancy and not how it will be created for the Town and residential.
The idea that you would say maintain the outdoor dining, we should think for the future, the existing is
not very well maintained or managed. We should ask that the commercial redevelopment address
those kind of issues. The master plan should clearly have language that deals with trash management.
There should be some verbiage about how noise is handled. This is promoting an incentive for the
commercial, but understand this is also a burden on the residential in the building.
Rediker, what is the creation of economic land use incentives in the language?
Ruther it is should versus shall. In this case, maybe the incentive is a change in review process,
waiver of fees, parking requirement, etc..
Jensen says Dana Tang had some well presented comments. We’re looking at one document, but
how does that play into other pieces? The Red Lion has been there a longtime, he is supportive of
vibrancy commitment, but would encourage balancing that with residential component.
Lipnick, no comments.
Hagedorn, in general in favor, hesitant of no-net loss but that’s another item. Understands public
comments, we have separate sections of code that address many of those concerns, the master plan
is not the place to address those, this doesn’t change residential rights.
Smith, appreciates using master plan for what we want to achieve in this area. Scary to imagine change
but agrees Vail should be vibrant and cool and keep it going for the next generation. Supports common
consumption area and entertainment district in the area. Appreciates incentives alluded to in the master
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of October 13, 2025
10
605
plan.
Rediker, wonders why this is necessary. He is not comfortable with “Town should explore, to be
successful…”Not sure about “exploring the creation of incentives” Agrees with the importance of
the commercial spaces in this building, but if we’re looking at 3.9 made some suggestions about
the language.
Ruther, the town passed an emergency ordinance, the Red Lion had an active application. We’re
trying to break the logjam so the building can move forward and achieve what they both want.
Rediker wants to soften language, don’t want people to think anything is mandatory.
Robyn Smith made a motion to forward a recommendation of approval with the findings on pg. 6 &
7; Brad Hagedorn seconded the motion Failed (2 - 2). Voting For: Brad Hagedorn, Robyn Smith
Voting Against: John Rediker, William A Jensen
John Rediker made a motion to forward a recommendation of approval striking the three sentences
discussed and proposing additional language, including the findings on page 6 & 7; William A
Jensen seconded the motion Passed (4 - 0).
5. Approval of Minutes
5.1 9-22-2025 PEC Meeting Minutes
092225 PEC Minutes.pdf
Robyn Smith made a motion to Approve ; Brad Hagedorn seconded the motion Passed (4 - 0).
6. Information Update
7. Adjournment
Robyn Smith made a motion to Adjourn ; Brad Hagedorn seconded the motion Passed (4 - 0).
Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of October 13, 2025
11
606
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: October 13, 2025
SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of
a new Special Development District, pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special
Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a multi -
family project, located at 442 South Frontage Road East/ Vail Village Filing 5, Tract
D. (PEC25-0026)
And
A request for review of a Conditional Use Permit amendment, pursuant to Section
12-6H-3 Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, in accordance with Title 12, Chapter
16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow for timeshare units, located
at Located at 442 South Frontage Road East/ Vail Village Filing 5, Tract D.
(PEC25-0024)
Applicant: Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC represented by Ruther Associates
LLC
Planner: Greg Roy
I. SUMMARY
The applicant, Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC, represented by Ruther Associates is
requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of a new
Special Development District, pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development
Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a multi-family project, located
at 442 South Frontage Road East/ Vail Village Filing 5, Tract D and review of a Conditional
Use Permit amendment, pursuant to Section 12-6H-3 Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code,
in accordance with Title 12, Chapter 16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to
allow for timeshare units.
Based upon staff’s review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and
the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department
recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission forward a recommendation of
denial to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of a new special development
district and that the Planning and Environmental Commission denies the request for an
amendment to a conditional use permit.
607
Town of Vail Page 2
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The applicant, Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC, represented by Ruther Associates is
requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of a new
Special Development District, pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development
Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a multi -family project and an
amendment to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-6H-3 Conditional Uses,
Vail Town Code, in accordance with Title 12, Chapter 16, Conditional Use Permits , Vail
Town Code.
The following items are included for review:
Attachment A. Vicinity Map
Attachment B. Applicant Narrative
Attachment C. Lunar Park Traffic Assessment 7-17-25
Attachment D. Lunar Park – EIR – 7-23-25
Attachment E. PEC25-0026 Documents
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans
Attachment G. PEC Results 9-8-25
Attachment H. PEC Results 9-22-25
Attachment I. Letter from Vail AIPP
Attachment J. Employee Housing Plan
Attachment K. Housing Department Comments
Attachment L. Public Comment
III. BACKGROUND
On November 4, 1965, the original plat of the Vail Village Fifth Filing was approved by the
Eagle County Planning Commission that established Tract D, Vail Village Fifth Filing. The
next year in 1966 this lot was annexed into the Town of Vail.
The Apollo Park buildings were constructed in the early 1970s as employee housing. In
September of 1978 a condominium map of the Apollo Park at Vail Association was
recorded in the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder’s office and the owners at that time
began to sell the fractional ownership of the units creating the Timeshare use on the site.
Originally one lot, in 2006 the site was subdivided to allow for the development of
Mountain View Residences Phase 1 and Mountain View Residences Phase 2 (Altus).
These were constructed in 2008 and 2019, respectively.
The Apollo Park lot has remained largely unchanged outside of the nearby developments.
As part of the Altus development, the Apollo Park did redesign and improve the pool area
on-site.
608
Town of Vail Page 3
The application for a Conditional Use Permit (PEC25-0024), Special Development District
(PEC25-0026), and Master Plan Amendment (PEC25 -0025) were reviewed at the
September 8, 2025 PEC meeting. The PEC’s comments can be reviewed in the minutes
from that meeting in Attachment G. The item was reviewed for changes at the September
22, 2025 PEC meeting with no additional review from staff due to the timing of the
resubmittal. The PEC provided comments which can be found in the minutes from that
meeting in Attachment H.
The project is composed of the following components:
Dwelling Units
The project is proposing an increase from 40 timeshare units on the property to 36
timeshare units, 32 dwelling units, 6 attached accommodation units, and 8 employee
housing units. Twenty of the dwelling units and the six attached accommodation units
would be in the Lunar Park North building and twelve dwelling units would be in the Lunar
Park South building. All of the timeshare units would be located in the Apollo Park
building. The total proposed GRFA of the project is 106,521 square feet.
Employee Housing Units (EHUs)
The project proposes eight EHUs within the Lunar Park North building, totaling
approximately 6,488 square feet. Per the Vail Town Code, TYPE VII Inclusionary Zoning
Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) and are thus not added to the total of the
development’s proposed GRFA. The 10% Inclusionary Zoning requirement is for the net
new GRFA on the site. In total there is 7,862 SF of employee housing required for the
development, leaving 1,374 SF of additional floor area not included on site. The applicant
is proposing to mitigate this amount through fee-in-lieu, which would equate to a minimum
of $928,494.24.
Parking
The project proposes 117 on-site parking spaces within the Lunar Park North building.
The majority of the parking structure is accessed through the southern garage entrance
with one level of parking accessed through the norther garage entrance that faces South
Frontage Road.
IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Staff finds that the following provisions of the Vail Town Code are relevant to the review
of this proposal.
Title 12 – Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code
Chapter 12-6H: High Density Multiple-Family (HDMF) District
Chapter 9A: Special Development (SDD) District
609
Town of Vail Page 4
Chapter 24: Inclusionary Zoning
VAIL LAND USE PLAN
Goals and Policies (in part):
1.0 General Growth/Development
1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance
between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the
permanent resident.
1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever
possible.
1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed
areas (infill areas).
5.0 Residential
5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted
areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist.
5.3 Affordable employee housing should be made available through private efforts,
assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail with appropriate restrictions.
5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and
upgraded. Additional employee housing needs should be accommodated at varied sites
throughout the community.
VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN
BUILDING HEIGHT PLAN (Pg 22)
Generally speaking, it is the goal of this Plan to maintain -the concentration of low scale
buildings in the core area while positioning larger buildings along the northern periphery
(along the Frontage Road), as depicted in the Building Height Profile Plan. This pattern
has already been established and-in some cases these larger structures along, the
Frontage Road serve to frame views over Vail Village to Vail Mountain. The Building
Height Plan also strives, in some areas, to preserve major views from public right-of-ways.
610
Town of Vail Page 5
Building heights greatly influence the character of the built environment in the Village.
This is particularly true in the Village Core where typical building heights of three to four
stories establish a pleasing human scale.
The building heights expressed on this Illustrative Plan are intended to provide general
guidelines. Additional study should be made during specific project review relative to a
building's height impact and the streetscape and relationship to surrounding structures.
Specific design considerations on building heights are found in the Sub-Area section of
this-Plan and in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan.
611
Town of Vail Page 6
612
Town of Vail Page 7
(Pg 55)
The East Frontage Road Sub-Area is comprised of condominium and time share
residential development. This sub-area is unique in that its access is directly off of the
Frontage Road, causing little vehicular impact on other areas of the Village. Large areas
of surface parking within the sub-area provide the opportunity for additional residential
infill development. Given proper attention to design considerations, this sub-area could
provide additional density within close proximity to the Village core. At the present time,
the sub-area is separated from the Village core by Gore Creek. This sub-area has a
pedestrian connection with the Village and Ford Park-via the Village Streamwalk. A
sidewalk along the Frontage Road should be constructed to improve pedestrian safety
and further connect the Village parking structure to Ford Park. The area between
buildings and Gore Creek must be improved to enhance natural environment.
#9-1 Parking Lot Infill
Residential infill over existing surface parking. Height of building to be limited so
as to not impede view corridors from the frontage road (and Interstate 70) to the
Village and Vail Mountain. Mass of buildings to step back from the Frontage Roa
to prevent sun/shade impacts on the road. Satisfying parking demand on site will
necessitate structured parking. A substantial landscape buffer shall be provided
between any new development and the Frontage Road without jeopardizing future
frontage road improvements. Special emphasis on 1.2, 2.3, 2.6, 3.1,3.4, 5.4, 6.1
Goals, objectives, policies and action steps (Pg 11)
Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and
commercial facilities.
Policy 1.2.1: Additional development may be allowed as identified by the Action
Plan and as is consistent with the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design Guide
Plan.
Policy 1.2.2: Development and improvement projects shall be coordinated to
minimize the unintended negative consequences associated with construction
activity in a pedestrianized, commercial area. For instance, the noise abatement,
project completion guarantees, temporary parking, traffic control, etc
Objective 2.3: Increase the number of residential units available for short term overnight
accommodations.
Policy 2.3.1: The development of short term accommodation units is strongly
encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing density levels are
required to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available for
short term overnight rental.
Objective 2.6: Encourage the development of employee housing units in Vail Village
through the efforts of the private sector.
Policy 2.6.1: Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or
redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by existing zoning.
613
Town of Vail Page 8
Policy 2.6.2: Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate restrictions so
as to insure their availability and affordability to the local work force.
Policy 2.6.3: The Town of Vail may facilitate in the development of affordable
housing by providing appropriate assistance.
Policy 2.6.4: Employee housing shall be developed in the Village when required
by the Town’s adopted Zoning Regulations
Objective 3.1: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other
improvements.
Policy 3.1.1: Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting and seating areas),
along adjacent pedestrian ways.
Policy 3.1.2: Public art and other similar landmark features shall be encouraged at
appropriate locations throughout the Town.
Policy 3.1.3: Flowers, trees, water features, and other landscaping shall be
encouraged throughout the Town in locations adjacent to, or visible from, public
areas.
Objective 3.4: Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible
green space areas, including pocket parks and stream access.
Policy 3.4.1: Physical improvements to property adjacent to stream tracts shall not
further restrict public access.
Policy 3.4.2: Private development projects shall be required to incorporate new
sidewalks along streets adjacent to the project as designated in the Vail Village
Master Plan and/or Recreation Trails Master Plan.
Policy 3.4.3: The “privatization” of the town-owned Gore Creek stream tract shall
be strongly discouraged.
Policy 3.4.4: Encroachment of private improvements on the town -owned Gore
Creek stream tract shall be prohibited.
Policy 3.4.5: The Town shall require the removal of existing improvements
constructed without the Town’s consent within the town-owned Gore Creek stream
tract
Objective 5.4: Improve the streetscape circulation corridors throughout the Village.
Policy 5.4.1: The Town shall work with the Colorado Division of Highways toward
the implementation of a landscaped boulevard and parkway along the South
Frontage Road.
Policy 5.4.2: Medians and right-of -ways shall be landscaped.
Objective 6.1: Provide service and delivery facilities for existing and new development.
V. ZONING / SDD NO. 44 ANALYSIS
Address: 442 S Frontage Rd E
614
Town of Vail Page 9
Legal Description: Vail Village Filing 5 Tract D
Existing Zoning: High Density Multiple-Family
Existing Land Use Designation: Vail Village Master Plan
Mapped Geological Hazards: N/A
Existing Land Use Zoning District
North: I-70 NA
East: Residential High Density Multiple-Family (HDMF)
South: Stream Tract Natural Area Preservation (NAP)
West: Residential High Density Multiple-Family (HDMF)
Standard Allowed/required Proposed Complies
Site Area 10,000 SF Min 56,347 SF Complies
Setbacks 20 Ft All Sides
Front: 20’
Side (East): 20’
Side (West): 6’
subgrade
Rear: 20’
Deviation requested
sub-grade on West
side setback
Height 48 Ft 69.8 Ft Deviation Requested
Density (onsite) 25 Units/Acre: 31
Units 68 Units Deviation Requested
GRFA 76 SF/100 Buildable:
40,434 SF 106,521 SF Deviation Requested
Site Coverage 55%: 30,991 SF 34,065 or 60% Deviation Requested
Landscaping 30%: 16,890 SF 16,245 SF or 28.8% Deviation Requested
Onsite Parking 122 Spaces & 75%
within the building
117 Spaces & 100%
within the building
Deviation Requested
Comparison of development applications between proposed SDD and Approved SDD
No. 42:
Standard Allowed/Required
HDMF
Mountain
View Altus Lunar/Apollo
Site Area Min: 10,000 SF 56,410 SF 56,437 SF
Setbacks Front - 20' Side - 20'
Rear- 20'
Front - 20' Side (W) 20' Side
(E) - 15' Rear - 20'
Front - 20'
Side (W) 6'
Side (E) - 20'
Rear - 20'
Height Flat or Mansard Roof -
45' Sloping Roof 48'
Sloping Roof
- 48'
Sloping Roof -
70 Ft
Sloping Roof
69.8
Density
(Units) 25 Dus/Buildable Acre 38 DUs or 29.3/acre 68 DUs or 55
DUs/acre
615
Town of Vail Page 10
Density
(GRFA)
Max: 76SF/100SF of
Buildable Site Area
75,280 or 170% of Allowable
GRFA
106,521 or
259% of
Allowable
GRFA
Site
Coverage Max: 55% 48% 60%
Landscaping Min: 30% of total site
area 40% 28.80%
VI. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGN CRITERIA
Before acting on a special development district application, the Planning and
Environmental Commission and Town Council shall consider the following factors with
respect to the proposed special development district.
1. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate
environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural
design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual
integrity and orientation.
Overall Compatibility
The Applicant is proposing a new special development district for the Apollo
Park/Lunar park site. The analysis of the development standards is listed above.
The site today has two buildings on the south side of the property that fronts on the
Gore Creek pathway between Vail Valley Dr and Ford Park. The parcel to the south
is Surveyed Stream Tract and Designated Open Space , providing the highest level
of protection for an open space property that is possible in the town. To the east of
the subject property is The Wren condominiums which has a parking structure, pool
area, and approximately 65 units. To the west of the property are the Mountain View
Residences and the Altus development.
Compatibility with neighborhood and adjacent properties
The parcel to the south is Designated Open Space and surveyed Stream Tract,
containing the pathway that connects Vail Village to Ford Park. Other properties have
a consistent landscape buffer that separates the buildings from the pathway with a
large landscaped slope that extends from the pathway up to the location of the
buildings. The proposed development plans would lower the level of the grade along
that south property line to increase the amount of building façade along that south
property line. Per 14-10-8 (A)(2): “The major objective of the landscaping is to help
reduce the scale of new structures…”, which the neighboring properties have done
and the subject proposal does not.
616
Town of Vail Page 11
To the east, the Wren property has an approximate height of forty feet from the lowest
level to the ridge of the building, based on the condominium map for the building.
While this is not how the Town measures height, for general compatibility it is a good
measurement of how the building may be compared to the proposed development.
Utilizing the same measurement method the Apollo Park time share and Lunar Park
South would come in at 62 feet and Lunar Park North at 88 feet from the lowest floor
level to the highest point of the roof. This is generally not compatible in the manner of
height to this building as the Wren has followed the height limitations of the HDMF
zone district.
To the West the Mountain View Residences (MVR) was also developed under the
HDMF zone district and has a maximum measured height of 48 feet. As this building
is along the south property line it is most appropriately compared to the proposed
Apollo Park Timeshare building and the Lunar Park South building. These two
buildings have a height measurement of 63.5 and 63 feet, respectively. The added
height of 14 feet equates to an approximate 3,000 square feet of building façade that
is visible from the south.
The bulk and mass of the proposed project, in comparison with adjacent properties,
is significantly larger than the buildings on either side. GRFA is a measure of the size
of a project as it calculates the internal floor area of a building. The MVR and Altus
buildings combined have approximately 75,280 square feet of GRFA combined. The
Wren has a total close to 65,000 square feet based upon historical calculations. The
proposed project would have 106,521 SF of GRFA or 30-60% more than the adjacent
properties, putting the bulk and mass far beyond what could be considered compatible
with adjacent properties.
The orientation of the buildings on the lot generally follow the way the lot lines are laid
out with the building on the south side, the widest portion of the lot, going east to west,
similar to current day orientation and to those of the adjacent properties. The infill
building to the north is oriented in the North/South direction , similar to shape of lot in
this area.
The architectural character of the buildings do generally follow the design of the
adjacent buildings with sloped roofs being the predominantly visible roof forms
throughout the development. There is traditional use of stone at the base of the
building with the mixture of stucco and metal at the upper levels. The adjacent
structures have a significant amount of stucco used on their exteriors and southern
two buildings replicate that look with stucco being the dominant material.
The character of the buildings each seem unique with varying architectural detailing
and materials. The north building has its own color pallet and style that is separate
from the other two buildings and does not relate. The Lunar Park South building is
similar to the Apollo Timeshare building in materials and color but the south façade
617
Town of Vail Page 12
has a significant amount of glazing in comparison to its neighbor. As they are all
located within the same development lot, the Town’s design standards would call for
more of a similar approach to the three buildings to keep the character generally
compatible.
While there are some parts of this project that are similar and sensitive to the
neighborhood and adjacent uses, the buildings proposed mass, scale, and height
result in this criterion not being met.
2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient
and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
The proposed uses, which include multifamily dwelling units and timeshare units, are
appropriate for the site as it is the same use as the adjacent lots. The density of the
uses as proposed are not compatible with the site or surrounding uses. Through the
SDD process the applicant is seeking a deviation to exceed the density that would be
allowable on the site. Per the zoning, a maximum of 31 units and 40,434 SF of GRFA
is permitted on the site. The request is to exceed this amount at 177% and 259% of
those amounts, respectively.
The proposed density of 68 dwelling units occupying 106,521 square feet of GRFA
exceeds the appropriate amount of development for the site and what would be
compatible with the adjacent properties. MVR and Altus combined have only 38 units
and 75,000 SF of GRFA. The Wren has 65 dwelling units, but the individual units are
much smaller units with only 65,000 SF of GRFA for the site.
Staff finds this criteria is not met.
3. Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as
outlined in chapter 10 of this title.
The required parking for the proposed number and size of units is 122 parking spaces.
The applicant notes that the 8 EHUs require only 8 spaces in their parking plan sheets,
however EHUs are treated as any other dwelling unit for parking calculation purposes,
with the exception of the Community Housing districts. The EHUs are all between 500
SF and 2000 SF requiring two spaces per unit for a total of 16 spaces for the EHUs.
The applicant is proposing to provide 117 parking spaces within an enclosed parking
garage. This is a deviation of five spaces below the required number of spaces,
however, with four of the EHUs being smaller one bedroom units and three others
being one bedroom units, the reduced number of spaces may be appropriate as those
EHUs would likely be single occupancy units. The application meets the requirement
of the HDMF zone district that at least 75% of the parking be within and enclosed
building.
618
Town of Vail Page 13
The loading space will be located on the northern side of the property between the
main entrance to South Frontage road and the entrance to the west shared across the
Altus property. The proposed location will need to be reviewed by the Fire Department
to ensure it will not conflict with any required Fire Lanes.
Staff finds this criteria to be met.
4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail
comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans.
The property is subject to the Vail Village Master Plan. Part of that plan (#9-1 Parking
Lot Infill) notes that this property is one where a future infill development could take
place on the northern portion of the lot. The current proposal does propose to infill that
portion of the lot in compliance with that language. Later in that same subsection of
the plan it notes that the infill development should step back from the frontage road to
not shadow the frontage road. The current plan does not step the bui lding back in a
way to avoid shadowing the road and potentially causing icing issues on South
Frontage Rd.
That section of the Master Plan also stipulates that “A substantial landscape buffer
shall be provided between any new development and the Frontage Road without
jeopardizing future frontage road improvements.” While there is a good amount of
landscaping proposed between the building and the frontage road, that is all located
on the right-of-way and not on the subject property. This design could result in future
roadway improvements removing all of the landscaping and leaving none between the
frontage road and the building. The purpose of this master plan policy is to ensure that
landscaping will remain to shroud the building from view in the even that the right-of-
way needs to be utilized for roadway purposes. Since the South Frontage Road is
CDOT property and not owned by the Town of Vail, there is less surety about what
future improvements may include and if the proposed landscaping in the ROW may
remain in perpetuity.
Policy 2.6.4 of the Vail Village Master Plan states: “Employee housing shall be
developed in the Village when required by the Town’s adopted Zoning Regulations.”
In order to meet this policy all of the required housing in the project should be provided
on-site. Per the Housing Plan provided there are 6,488 SF of the required 7,862 SF
proposed to be included within the development, not meeting that policy.
Similarly Policy 2.6.2. requires a measure of affordability be introduced to EHUs in the
Village: “Policy 2.6.2: Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate
restrictions so as to insure their availability and affordability to the local work force.”
Per Resolution No. 34, Series of 2023 homes are considered affordable if rental home
costs are less than 30% of the monthly income for a household at or below 60% of the
median income. For-sale units have mortgage payment cost of less than 30% of the
monthly income for a household at or below 100% of the median income. The
619
Town of Vail Page 14
applicant’s narrative notes that the units will be restricted to people working within Vail,
but not that there will be any restrictions on the price to make them affordable as the
Master Plan requires.
Staff finds this criteria is not met.
5. Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or
geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development
district is proposed.
According to the Official Town of Vail Geologic Hazard Maps, the Lunar Park
development site is not located in any geologically sensitive areas or within the 100-
year floodplain of Gore Creek or its tributaries.
Staff finds this criteria to be met.
6. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space
provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and
sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the
community.
The proposed site plan does not provide the minimum amount of landscaping for the
zone district. The applicant includes in their narrative that the amount of landscaping
being provided is 16,245 SF or 28% of the lot. This is mitigated by additional
landscaping on top of the structure, however that landscaping does not achieve the
main purpose of landscaping which is to reduce the overall scale of new structures.
The majority of the landscaping around the site is situated along the west and south
property lines, which will provide a good buffer between the properties to the south
and west.
However, as noted above, there is little to no landscaping on the north side of the
property except that which is in the ROW. To the east, there are some trees proposed
to be located on the subject property, but the majority of those shown are on the
adjacent property and cannot be required to be planted. The lack of sufficient
landscaping on these two property lines is reflective of a site plan that does not
produce a functional development. The development proposes 60% site coverage of
the property which is 5% over the maximum allowed in the base zone district. This
amount is strictly above grade site coverage and does not include the additional 11%
below grade site coverage that is no longer counted. The additional above grade site
coverage reduces the amount of available space for landscaping.
The proposed site plan also includes some of the internal circulation to the north of
the Lunar Park North building within the right-of-way, which has not been amended
on the plans per staff comments.
Staff finds this criteria is not met.
620
Town of Vail Page 15
7. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians
addressing on and off site traffic circulation.
The circulation within the site aims to bring the traffic through the front of the site, with
a shared access with the Altus property and a major access point from South Frontage
Rd. The majority of the parking would be accessed from the interior of the si te via the
chute along the eastern edge of the property. The main pedestrian access is along
the western side of the proposed building through the above grade walkway that is on
the subject property and the Altus property within a public access easement. There is
additional private pedestrian access, serving also as fire department access along the
south side of the Lunar Park South and Apollo Park building.
Staff finds this criteria to be met.
8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to
optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function.
The project includes minimal landscaping through the interior of the site and along the
northern and eastern property lines. The greatest amount of landscaping is
appropriately placed along the western property line that shares the public access
path with the Altus development.
The southern portion of the site does have an appropriate amount of planting but does
not follow the natural or existing grading in the area and proposes a cut of 9-15 feet
to accommodate the lowest level of the southerly buildings. The lowest level of the
building could be removed in order to preserve the natural or existing features and
allow for more landscaping to reduce the impact of the new buildings. This would serve
the major objective of landscaping by reducing the bulk and scale of new buildings
while also preserving the natural features of the site.
As proposed, staff finds this criteria is not met.
9. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable,
functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special
development district.
A phasing plan is not contemplated with this proposal. All work including
improvements not on the property are proposed to be done concurrently.
Staff finds this criteria to be met.
VII. REVIEW CRITERIA – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the town;
621
Town of Vail Page 16
The CUP amendment is to continue the use on the same site and within the general same
location. The continued use of timeshares is supported by the development objectives of
the Town with the continuation of “hot beds” being something that is desirable to the
community.
Staff finds this criterion to be met.
2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation
facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities
and public facilities needs;
The relocation of the existing Timeshare units would have no noticeable increase in the
distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities or other public facilities listed as
part of this criteria. The end amount of units is slightly reduced from the 40 existing
timeshare units to 36 timeshare units, providing an overall decrease on these potential
public facilities and their needs.
Staff finds this criterion to be met.
3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and
pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access,
maneuverability and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas;
The conditional use amendment would reduce the number of units, which results in less
parking and traffic as well as potential occupants. This should have a net benefit as far
as reducing congestion and increasing pedestrian safety.
Staff finds this criterion to be met.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be
located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to
surrounding uses;
The proposed amendment to the CUP does affect the scale and bulk of the proposed use
in comparison to the existing Timeshares on the site. The existing units are split between
two structures that were built with four levels and within the maximum height of 48 feet.
The proposed structure would reach a maximum height of 63.5 feet. The south and north
façade presently appears as a four story structure. In the proposed plan the building would
show four stories to the north, or interior of the lot. To the south, where the property abuts
the Stream Tract and Ford Park path, the proposed development would have six stories
above grade.
622
Town of Vail Page 17
The change in height and southerly façade is important in relation to the surrounding uses
and buildings. On both the east and west of the property the south facades of the adjacent
properties present as four story structures, leaving the proposed building out of character.
The character of the Apollo Park building also differs substantially from the adjacent
proposed Lunar Park South, which has more generous floor to floor levels and presents
as a five story structure with significantly more glazing.
Staff finds this criterion is not met.
5. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the
proposed use; and
6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an
environmental impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this title.
An Environmental Impact Report was submitted with these applications. In the
Summary and Mitigation Measures section there were no direct impacts of the
development that would be applicable to the review of this conditional use permit
amendment request.
Staff finds this criterion to be met.
VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Special Development District
Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and
the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department
recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation
of denial to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of a new Special Development
District pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to
allow for the development of a multi-family project, located at 442 South Frontage Road
East/ Vail Village Filing 5, Tract D. (PEC25-0026)
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to recommend denial of
this request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission
pass the following motion:
“The Planning and Environmental Commission recommends denial to the Vail Town
Council for the establishment of a new Special Development District pursuant to
Section 12-9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the
development of a multi-family project, located at 442 South Frontage Road East/ Vail
Village Filing 5, Tract D. (PEC25-0026)”
623
Town of Vail Page 18
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to recommend denial
of this request, the Community Development Department recommends the
Commission make the following findings:
1. The SDD does not comply with the standards listed in Section VII of this
memorandum, or the applicant has not demonstrated that one or more of the
standards is not applicable;
2. The SDD is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in
the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the development objectives of
the town;
3. The SDD is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for
the surrounding areas; and
4. The SDD promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town
and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a
manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its
established character as a resort and residential community of the highest
quality.”
Conditional Use Permit
The Community Development Department recommends the Planning and
Environmental Commission deny the conditional use permit. This recommendation is
based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section Vll of this memorandum and the
evidence and testimony presented.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to deny this conditional
use permit request, the Community Development Department recommends the
Commission passes the following motion:
“The Planning and Environmental Commission denies the applicant’s request for
an amendment to a conditional use permit per Section 12 -16-10 Amendment
Procedures, Vail Town Code, in accordance with Chapter 12 -16 Conditional Use
Permits to allow for timeshare units, located at Located at 442 South Frontage
Road East/ Vail Village Filing 5, Tract D. (PEC25-0024)”
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to deny this conditional
use permit request, the Community Development Department recommends the
Commission makes the following findings:
“Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section Vll of the Staff
memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated October 13,
624
Town of Vail Page 19
2025, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and
Environmental Commission finds:
1. The proposed conditional use permit is not in accordance with the purposes of
the Zoning Regulations and the High Density Residential zone district.
2. The proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it will be
operated or maintained are detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. The proposed conditional use permit does not comply with each of the
applicable provisions of Chapter 12-16, Conditional Use Permit, Vail Town
Code.”
IX. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A. Vicinity Map
Attachment B. Applicant Narrative
Attachment C. Lunar Park Traffic Assessment 7-17-25
Attachment D. Lunar Park – EIR – 7-23-25
Attachment E. PEC25-0026 Documents
Attachment F. PEC25-0026 Plans
Attachment G. PEC Results 9-8-25
Attachment H. PEC Results 9-22-25
Attachment I. Letter from Vail AIPP
Attachment J. Employee Housing Plan
Attachment K. Housing Department Comments
Attachment L. Public Comment
625
1
12/31/2025
ORDINANCE NO. 28
SERIES OF 2025
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A NEW
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 44, LUNAR PARK, AND
SPECIFICALLY TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT,
LOCATED AT 442 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD EAST
WHEREAS, Section 12-9A-4 of the Vail Town Code permits for establishment of
new Special Development Districts;
WHEREAS, Lunar Vail Land Investments LLC ("Owner") owns the property more
particularly described as 442 South Frontage Road East, Vail, Colorado (the "Property");
WHEREAS, on June 18, 2025, Owner filed an application (the "Application") for
the establishment of a new Special Development District No. 44, Lunar Park, more
specifically for a Development Plan for the Property;
WHEREAS, on October 13, 2025, the Planning and Environmental Commission
(the "PEC") held a properly-noticed public hearing on the Application, and recommended
that the Town Council deny the Application; and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2025, the Town Council held a properly-noticed
public hearing on the Application and continued the item to the December 2, 2026 Town
Council meeting; and
WHEREAS, on December 2, 2025, the Town Council tabled the hearing to the
January 6, 2026 Town Council meeting; and
WHEREAS, on January 6, 2026 the Town Council held a properly-noticed public
hearing on the Application.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT:
Section 1. The Town Council, upon reviewing the Application and the Planning
Commission recommendation, hearing the statements of Town staff and the public, and
giving due consideration to the matter, finds and determines as follows:
a. The Application complies with all applicable criteria set forth in the Vail
Town Code; and
b. The Town Council hereby approves the establishment of a new Special
Development District No. 44, Lunar Park, as provided in Section 2 hereof.
Section 2. The Development Plan for Lunar Park, is hereby established as set
forth in the Development Plan: PEC25-0026, Exhibit A.
626
2
12/31/2025
Section 3. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would
have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or
phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections,
sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
Section 4. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this
ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town and the
inhabitants thereof.
Section 5. The amendment of any provision of the Vail Town Code as provided
in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor
any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision
amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any
ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
Section 6. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof,
inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This
repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or
part thereof, theretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 6th day of January, 2026, and a
public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 20th day of January,
2026, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail,
Colorado.
______________________________
Barry Davis, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk
READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED IN FULL this 20th day of January, 2026.
______________________________
Barry Davis, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
627
3
12/31/2025
Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk
628
4
12/31/2025
Exhibit A
629
SO
U
T
H
F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
S
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25AS-01
ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
20
'
-
0
"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
NORTH / SITE PARKING
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK
SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE
PARKING
GARAGE
THE WREN
AT VAIL
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES
10
'
10
'
22
'
27
'
21
'
21
'
20'
20'
20'
41'
N
0 8'16'32'
SCALE - 1/16" = 1'-0"
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES
SOUTH /
APOLLO
PARK
Revised
01.06.26
63
0
S
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A002
EXISTING VS PROPOSED SETBACK DIAGRAM
20
'
-
0
"
PROPOSED BUILDING
FOOTPRINT
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK
SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE
PARKING
GARAGE
THE WREN
AT VAIL
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES
10
'
10
'
22
'
27
'
21
'
21
'
21'
20'
41'
N
0 8'16'32'
SCALE - 1/16" = 1'-0"
20'
EXISTING APOLLO PARK
FOOTPRINT
EXISTING BUILDING 2'
FROM PROPERTY LINE
1
2
'
7'-7
"
6'
-
9
"
20'-
4
"
15
'
3
3
'
2
6
'
SETBACK
SETBACK
Revised
01.06.26
63
1
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
33
34
35
36
37
40C
21 22 23 24 25 282627 29 30
45
8
7
11
9
3 2
1
10
STAIR 2
20 31C 32C
UP
12C
RAMP
39
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
38
BIKE
STOR.
MECH.
316 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
613
14
15
16
17
1918MECH.
LOW
HEIGHT
STORAGE
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A003
PARKING
LEVEL P2
BUILDING AREA IN SETBACK
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
AREA 1 - 380 S.F.
AREA 2 - 891 S.F.
63
2
S
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25
SITE ACCESS DIAGRAM
A004
N
0 8'16'32'
SCALE - 1/16" = 1'-0"
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES
SOUTH /
APOLLO
PARK
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
NORTH / SITE PARKING
PROPERTY LINE
ALTUS
VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES
VA
I
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
FO
R
D
P
A
R
K
THE WREN
AT VAIL
PARKING
GARAGE
BUILDING ACCESS
VEHICLE ACCESS
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
FIRE ACCESS
SITE ACCESS DIAGRAM
LUNAR
RESIDE
SOU
LUNAR
RESIDEN
SOUT
VA
I
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
FO
R
D
P
A
R
K
Revised
01.06.26
63
3
DN
DN
DN
L.V.N.
UNIT E
STAIR
L.V.N.
UNIT G
(EHU)
1,048 N.S.F.
UPDN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV2,362 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
LOCK-OFF
2 BR / 1.5 BA
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LAUND BATH
BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
2,326 N.S.F.L.V.N.
UNIT A3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER
BATH
FOYER
FOYER
3 BR / 3.5 BA
DEN
2,513 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
L.V.N.
UNIT C
2,341 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5
BA + DEN
LAUND
1,275 N.S.F.
2,267 N.S.F.
2 BR / 2 BA
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A010
SITE COVERAGE PLAN
ABOVE GROUND
LUNAR VAIL NORTH
LUNAR VAIL
SOUTH /
APOLLO
PARK
4' MIN. AREA BUFFER
GARAGE BELOW
Revised
01.06.26
63
4
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
33
34
35
36
37
40C
21 22 23 24 25 282627 29 30
45
8
7
11
9
3 2
1
10
STAIR 2
20 31C 32C
UP
12C
RAMP
39
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
38
BIKE
STOR.
MECH.
316 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
613
14
15
16
17
1918MECH.
LOW
HEIGHT
STORAGE
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 09.22.25A011
SITE COVERAGE PLAN
BELOW GROUND
PARKING GARAGE
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
/ APOLLO PARK
4' AREA BUFFER
Revised
01.06.26
63
5
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A012
SITE COVERAGE PLAN
ROOF PLAN
NO ROOF OVERHANG SHALL
EXCEED 4'-0", TYPICAL UNLESS
NOTED OTHERWISE
ALL GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS
SHALL BE INTERNAL TO ROOF,
TYPICAL
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"
8'
-
9
"
4'8"
4'-6"
4'10"
5'4"
2'-6"
4'6"
9'10"
5'-10"
4'-4"
3'-10"
3'-4"
3'
3'
-
2
"
2'
-
4
"
1'-9
"
2'-3
"
2'
3'
4'
7'
-
3
"
1'
2'
2'
3'
4'
1'
1'
2'
1'
1'
4'
2
'
4'
6
"
3'
4'4'
3'1'
3'6"
4'
3'4
"
4'
4'4'
3'
2'
-
3
"
7'
2'
Revised
01.06.26
63
6
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25
SITE LIGHTING
FIXTURES 14' POLE LIGHT LOCATED ALONG DRIVEWAYS AND
FRONTAGE ROAD
WALL SCONCE 1
LOCATED AT BUILDING ENTRANCES
1
ALL FIXTURES SELECTED ARE "DARK SKY CERTIFIED" BY MANUFACTURER
WALL SCONCE 2
LOCATED AT BALCONIES
2 RECESSED FIXTURE
LOCATED AT DECKS AND GROUND LEVEL ENTRIES
PATH LIGHT FIXTURE
SEE LANDSCAPE FOR LOCATIONS
A013
Revised
01.06.26
63
7
S
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A104
SITE LIGHTING PLAN
DRIVEWAY LIGHTING
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
1
1
1
RECESSED
FIXTURES
ABOVE
1
1
1
1
SEE ENLARGED PLAN
FOR RESIDENTIAL
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
ABOVE GRADE
SE
E
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
DR
A
W
I
N
G
S
F
O
R
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
ALL FIXTURES
SELECTED ARE "DARK
SKY CERTIFIED" BY
MANUFACTURER
SEE ENLARGED PLAN
FOR RESIDENTIAL
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
ABOVE GRADE
SEE ENLARGED PLAN
FOR RESIDENTIAL
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
ABOVE GRADE
RECESSED
FIXTURES
ABOVE
1
1
1
1
1
Revised
01.06.26
63
8
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A104
SITE LIGHTING
LUNAR VAIL NORTH
63
9
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A104
SITE LIGHTING
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
RECESSED
FIXTURES ABOVE
CENTERED ON
DOOR, TYP.
2
2
ALL FIXTURES
SELECTED ARE "DARK
SKY CERTIFIED" BY
MANUFACTURER
2
2
2
2
Revised
01.06.26
64
0
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
8200'
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A104
SITE LIGHTING
APOLLO PARK
ALL FIXTURES
SELECTED ARE "DARK
SKY CERTIFIED" BY
MANUFACTURER
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Revised
01.06.26
64
1
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UPUP
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
STAIR 1
VEST.
ELEV.
S
UNEXCAVATED
22 24 25
MECH.
23
+0'-0"-3'-0"
27 29 30 31 32
43C
26
UP
1
2
3
9
10
8
6
45
12
7
14C
15C
STAIR 2
16C
11
13
33 34 35C28
SPEED RAMP
36C
42
+0'-0"
UP
41 40 39 38 37
MECH.
17
18
19
MECH.
20
21
STOR.
STOR.
STOR.
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A021
PARKING
LEVEL P3
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R1
AREA PLAN
PARKING LEVEL P3
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R1
A.P. UNIT J
2 BD / 2 BA
829 GRFA
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
.
5
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
.
5
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
A
2
B
D
/
2
B
A
1
0
6
6
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
A
2
2
B
D
/
2
B
A
1
0
5
0
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
H
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
5
7
1
G
R
F
A
A.P. UNIT H
1 BD / 1 BA
572 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1065 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1066 GRFA
A.P. UNIT K
2 BD / 2 BA
1051 GRFA
A.P. UNIT G
1 BD / 1.5 BA
650 GRFA
Revised
01.06.26
64
2
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
33
34
35
36
37
40C
21 22 23 24 25 282627 29 30
45
8
7
11
9
3 2
1
10
STAIR 2
20 31C 32C
UP
12C
RAMP
39
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
38
BIKE
STOR.
MECH.
316 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
613
14
15
16
17
1918MECH.
LOW
HEIGHT
STORAGE
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
POWDER
POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
STAIR 6
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
AP UNIT
EVTR
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
UTILITYMASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
POWDER
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A022
PARKING
LEVEL P2
AREA PLAN
PARKING LEVEL P2
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R2
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R2
A.P. UNIT J
2 BD / 2 BA
829 GRFA
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
.
5
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
.
5
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
A
2
B
D
/
2
B
A
1
0
6
6
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
A
2
2
B
D
/
2
B
A
1
0
5
0
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
H
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
5
7
1
G
R
F
A
A.P. UNIT H
1 BD / 1 BA
572 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1065 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1066 GRFA
A.P. UNIT K
2 BD / 2 BA
1066 GRFA
A.P. UNIT G
1 BD / 1.5 BA
650 GRFA
Revised
01.06.26
64
3
STAIR 1
TRASH
HOLDING
10
9
4
3 2
1
VEST.
ELEV.
S
19C18C17
ARRIVALS
+0'
GENERATOR
6
5
8
7
16
STAIR 2
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
CON
T
R
O
L
A
R
M
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
EVTR
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
STAIR 4
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
BATH
BATH
BATH
POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
STAIR 6
EVTR
EVTR
TBD
TBD
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM MASTER
BEDROOM CLOS/
LAUND
MASTER
BATH BEDROOM
BATH
STORAGE
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
POWDER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
POWDER SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR 1
TRASH
HOLDING ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY10
9
4
3 2
1
VEST.
ELEV.
S MECH.
UP
RA
M
P
29
30
31
32
33
11
19C 21 22 23 24 27252618C17
ARRIVALS
28
+0'-0"
UP
13C
GENERATOR
6
5
8
7
16 20
15
TRASH
LIFT
STAIR 2
EV EV EV
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
14CON
T
R
O
L
A
R
M
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
12
EV EV EV
MECH.
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A023
PARKING
LEVEL P1
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R3
AREA PLAN
PARKING LEVEL P1
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R3
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO
A.P. UNIT J
2 BD / 2 BA
829 GRFA
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
.
5
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
.
5
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
A
2
B
D
/
2
B
A
1
0
6
6
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
A
2
2
B
D
/
2
B
A
1
0
5
0
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
H
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
5
7
1
G
R
F
A
A.P. UNIT H
1 BD / 1 BA
572 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1065 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1066 GRFA
A.P. UNIT K
2 BD / 2 BA
1086 GRFA
A.P. UNIT G
1 BD / 1.5 BA
650 GRFA
Revised
01.06.26
64
4
STAIR 3
EHU
LOBBY
R
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
BUILDING
LOBBY
STAIR 1
ELEV.
REGISTRATION
OFFICE
MAIL
DELIVERY
POOL
LOBBY
POOL
MECH.
DN
DN
UP
UP
STAIR
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
T.
STOR.
STOR.
MECH.
TRASH
ROOM
EHU
UNIT
BEDROOM
BATH
T.
EHU
UNIT
EHU
UNIT EHU
UNIT
EHU
UNIT
BEDROOM
BATH
EHU
UNIT
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
EVTR
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
CLOSET
WC
BATH #1
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
#1
WC
BATH
MASTER
BATH
WC
CLOSET
MASTER
BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
BATH
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
CLOSET
LAUNDRY
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
DINING
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
STAIR 6
EVTRFOYER
FOYER
FOYER
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
WC
WC
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
DINING
CLOSET
CLOSET
CLOSET
BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
KITCHEN
DINING
DINING
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A024
LEVEL R0LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R4
AREA PLAN
PARKING LEVEL P0
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R4
L.V.S. UNIT F
3 BD / 3 BA
2,165 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
2 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT E
3 BD / 3 BA
2,134 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT D
3 BD / 3 BA
1,924 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT C
3 BD / 3 BA
2,114 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT B
3 BD / 3 BA
1,820 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT A
3 BD / 3 BA
1,471 GRFA
Revised
01.06.26
64
5
DN
DN
DN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
BATH
MASTER
BATH
WC
CLOSET
MASTER
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR 6
EVTR
STAIR 4
STAIR 5
EVTR
FOYER
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
FOYER
FOYER
EVTR
WC
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
DINING
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
CLOSET
CLOSET
CLOSET
WC
WC
WC
DINING
DINING
DINING
L.V.N.
UNIT E
STAIR
L.V.N.
UNIT G
(EHU)
1,048 N.S.F.
UPDN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV2,362 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
LOCK-OFF
2 BR / 1.5 BA
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LAUND BATH
BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
2,326 N.S.F.L.V.N.
UNIT A3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER
BATH
FOYER
FOYER
3 BR / 3.5 BA
DEN
2,513 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
L.V.N.
UNIT C
2,341 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5
BA + DEN
LAUND
1,275 N.S.F.
2,267 N.S.F.
2 BR / 2 BA
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A025
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R5
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R1
AREA PLAN
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R1
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R5
L.V.N. UNIT A
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,328 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT B
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,485 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT C
3 BD / 3 BA + DEN
2,412 GRFA UNIT C
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT D
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,363 GRFA
UNIT D
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT E
2 BD / 2.5 BA
1,646 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT G
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT F
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT F
3 BD / 3 BA
2,165 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT E
3 BD / 3 BA
2,134 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT D
3 BD / 3 BA
1,924 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT C
3 BD / 3 BA
2,114 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT B
3 BD / 3 BA
1,820 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT A
3 BD / 3 BA
1,471 GRFA
Revised
01.06.26
64
6
L.V.N.
UNIT E
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
L.V.N.
UNIT G
(EHU)
STAIR
UPDN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
LAUND BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER FOYER
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT C
LAUND
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATHBATH
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT A
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A026
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R2
AREA PLAN
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R2
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH / APOLLO PARK
ROOF PLAN
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
/APOLLO PARK ROOF PLAN
L.V.N. UNIT A
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,328 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT B
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,485 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT C
3 BD / 3 BA + DEN
2,412 GRFA UNIT C
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT D
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,363 GRFA
UNIT D
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT E
2 BD / 2.5 BA
1,646 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT G
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT F
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
Revised
01.06.26
64
7
STAIR
UPDN
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER FOYERL.V.N.
UNIT E
L.V.N.
UNIT C
LAUND
BATH
BEDROOM
STAIR
UP
DN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
ELEVELEV
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
LAUND BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
FOYER
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT G
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATHBATH
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT A
BEDROOM
BATH
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A027
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R3
AREA PLAN
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R3
L.V.N. UNIT A
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,328 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT B
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,485 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT C
3 BD / 3 BA + DEN
2,412 GRFA UNIT C
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT D
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,363 GRFA
UNIT D
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT E
2 BD / 2.5 BA
1,522 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT G
1 BD / 1 BA
757 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT F
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA GR
E
E
N
R
O
O
F
AR
E
A
GR
E
E
N
R
O
O
F
AR
E
A
Revised
01.06.26
64
8
DN
ELEVELEV
STAIR
DN
STAIR
DEN
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATHBATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT J
BEDROOM
L.V.N.
UNIT K
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BATH
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A028
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R4
AREA PLAN
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R4
GR
E
E
N
R
O
O
F
AR
E
A
L.V.N. UNIT J
4 BD / 5.5 BA
4,208 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT K
4 BD / 3.5 BA
3,747 GRFA
GR
E
E
N
R
O
O
F
AR
E
A
ROOF
AMENITY
AREA
Revised
01.06.26
64
9
Revised
01.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A031
AERIAL VIEW LOOKING SOUTHWEST AERIAL VIEW LOOKING NORTH
AERIAL VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEASTPOOL PLAZA LOOKING WEST
650
Revised
01.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A032
VIEW FROM MOUNTAIN VIEW POOL DECK
VIEW FROM THE WREN LOWER PARKING DECK
POOL PLAZA LOOKING EAST
VIEW FROM MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES
65
1
Revised
01.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A033
VIEW FROM SOUTHVIEW FROM NORTHEAST
VIEW FROM NORTHWEST VIEW SOUTHEAST TOWARDS CREEK FROM APOLLO SECOND FLOOR
652
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
R0-LVN GROUND FLOOR
8222' -0"
5'-
0
"
10
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
0
"
13
'
-
6
"
9'-
0
"
14
'
-
0
"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
LVN EAVE
8273' -6"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR*
8191' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLR (P1)
8209' -0"
PLAZA
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 0
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' -6"
EAST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8218' -0"
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES NORTH
56
'
-
6
"
18
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
6
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
56
'
-
6
"
PARKING LEVEL P1
PARKING LEVEL P2
PARKING LEVEL P3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES SOUTH &
APOLLO PARK
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 5
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
SE
T
B
A
C
K
SE
T
B
A
C
K
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
70'-0" ABOVE EXISTING
GRADE
50'-0" ABOVE EXISTING
GRADE
ROOF TOP AMENITIES
PATH
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
E
D
G
E
O
F
W
A
T
E
R
(+/-) 99'-0 5/8" (VARIES)COPING 8265.83'
P2 -PARKING*
8199' -6"
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
R0-LVN GROUND FLOOR
8222' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR (P3)
8191' -0"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
LVN EAVE
8273' -6"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8209' -0"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -6"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
5'-
0
"
10
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
0
"
13
'
-
6
"
9'-
0
"
14
'
-
0
"
18
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
6
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
PLAZA
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES SOUTH &
APOLLO PARK
56
'
-
6
"
56
'
-
6
"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL R0
PARKING LEVEL P1
PARKING LEVEL P2
PARKING LEVEL P3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES NORTH
LINE OF EXISTING
GRADE
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 5
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
SE
T
B
A
C
K
SE
T
B
A
C
K
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW (VMVR)
RESIDENCES BEYOND
VMVR RIDGE 8250.00'
VMVR RIDGE 8248.01'
70'-0" ABOVE
EXISTING GRADE
50'-0" ABOVE
EXISTING GRADE ROOF TOP AMENITIES
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
E
D
G
E
O
F
W
A
T
E
R
PATH
COPING 8265.83'
P2 -PARKING*
8199' -6"
ALTUS VAIL
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN
VIE
W
THE WREN
AT VAIL
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
THE WREN
PARKING
2
2
1
1
3
3
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A041
2
SECTION THRU LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES NORTH
1
SITE SECTION THRU APOLLO PARK/
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES NORTH Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
653
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
R0-LVN GROUND FLOOR
8222' -0"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR*
8191' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLR (P1)
8209' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' -6"
EAST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8218' -0"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
0
"
13
'
-
6
"
9'-
0
"
14
'
-
0
"
PLAZA
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 0
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES NORTH
56
'
-
6
"
18
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
6
"
9'-
6
"
56
'
-
6
"
PARKING LEVEL P1
PARKING LEVEL P2
PARKING LEVEL P3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES SOUTH
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 5
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
SE
T
B
A
C
K
SE
T
B
A
C
K
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
70'-0" ABOVE EXISTING
GRADE
50'-0" ABOVE EXISTING
GRADE
ROOF TOP AMENITIES
PATH
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
E
D
G
E
O
F
W
A
T
E
R
(+/-) 88'-5 3/4" (VARIES)
OUTLINE OF EXISTING
APOLLO PARK
BUILDING A
15
'
-
0
"
COPING 8265.83'
P2 -PARKING*
8199' -6"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A042
3
SECTION THRU LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES NORTH1
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
ALTUS VAIL
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN
VIE
W
THE WREN
AT VAIL
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
THE WREN
PARKING
2
2
1
1
3
3
654
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UPUP
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
STAIR 1
VEST.
ELEV.
S
UNEXCAVATED
22 24 25
MECH.
23
+0'-0"-3'-0"
27 29 30 31 32
43C
26
UP
1
2
3
9
10
8
6
45
12
7
14C
15C
STAIR 2
16C
11
13
33 34 35C28
SPEED RAMP
36C
42
+0'-0"
UP
41 40 39 38 37
MECH.
17
18
19
MECH.
20
21
STOR.
STOR.
STOR.
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A051
PARKING
LEVEL P3
LEVEL P3 PARKING PLAN
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
Revised
01.06.26
65
5
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
33
34
35
36
37
40C
21 22 23 24 25 282627 29 30
45
8
7
11
9
3 2
1
10
STAIR 2
20 31C 32C
UP
12C
RAMP
39
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
38
BIKE
STOR.
MECH.
316 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
613
14
15
16
17
1918MECH.
LOW
HEIGHT
STORAGE
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
POWDER
POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
STAIR 6
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
AP UNIT
EVTR
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
UTILITYMASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
POWDER
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A052
PARKING
LEVEL P2
LEVEL P2 PARKING PLAN
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
Revised
01.06.26
65
6
STAIR 1
TRASH
HOLDING
10
9
4
3 2
1
VEST.
ELEV.
S
19C18C17
ARRIVALS
+0'
GENERATOR
6
5
8
7
16
STAIR 2
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
CON
T
R
O
L
A
R
M
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
EVTR
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
STAIR 4
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
BATH
BATH
BATH
POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
STAIR 6
EVTR
EVTR
TBD
TBD
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM MASTER
BEDROOM CLOS/
LAUND
MASTER
BATH BEDROOM
BATH
STORAGE
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
POWDER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
POWDER SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR 1
TRASH
HOLDING ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY10
9
4
3 2
1
VEST.
ELEV.
S MECH.
UP
RA
M
P
29
30
31
32
33
11
19C 21 22 23 24 27252618C17
ARRIVALS
28
+0'-0"
UP
13C
GENERATOR
6
5
8
7
16 20
15
TRASH
LIFT
STAIR 2
EV EV EV
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
14CON
T
R
O
L
A
R
M
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
12
EV EV EV
MECH.
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A053
PARKING
LEVEL P1
LEVEL P1 PARKING PLAN
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
Revised
01.06.26
65
7
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A054
NOT USED
OMIT FROM REVIEW
658
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UPUP
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
STAIR 1
VEST.
ELEV.
S
UNEXCAVATED
22 24 25
MECH.
23
+0'-0"-3'-0"
27 29 30 31 32
43C
26
UP
1
2
3
9
10
8
6
45
12
7
14C
15C
STAIR 2
16C
11
13
33 34 35C28
SPEED RAMP
36C
42
+0'-0"
UP
41 40 39 38 37
MECH.
17
18
19
MECH.
20
21
STOR.
STOR.
STOR.
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A2
A.P.
UNIT H
A.P.
UNIT J
A.P.
UNIT H
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT K
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A101
PARKING LEVEL P3
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R1
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
7
7
'
-
5
"
81
'
-
6
1
2"
75'-11"192'-31 2"
111
'
-
3
1 2 "
11
4
'
-
0
"
4
3
'
-
9
1
4"
22'-101 2"
16
'
-
1
1
3
4"
65'-81
2"
FLOOR PLANS
PARKING LEVEL P3
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R1
14'-0"Revised
01.06.26
65
9
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
33
34
35
36
37
40C
21 22 23 24 25 282627 29 30
45
8
7
11
9
3 2
1
10
STAIR 2
20 31C 32C
UP
12C
RAMP
39
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
38
BIKE
STOR.
MECH.
316 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
613
14
15
16
17
1918MECH.
LOW
HEIGHT
STORAGE
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
POWDER
POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
STAIR 6
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
AP UNIT
EVTR
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
UTILITYMASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
POWDER
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A2
A.P.
UNIT H
A.P.
UNIT J
A.P.
UNIT H
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT K
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A102
PARKING LEVEL P2
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R2
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
FLOOR PLANS
PARKING LEVEL P2
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R2
4
3
'
-
9
1
2"
7
7
'
-
5
"
131'-71
2"
62
'
-
9
1 2"
211'-2"75'-11"
111
'
-
3
1 2 "
11
4
'
-
0
"
22'-101 2"
16
'
-
1
1
1
2"
16
'
-
0
1 2"
Revised
01.06.26
66
0
STAIR 1
TRASH
HOLDING
10
9
4
3 2
1
VEST.
ELEV.
S
19C18C17
ARRIVALS
+0'
GENERATOR
6
5
8
7
16
STAIR 2
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
CON
T
R
O
L
A
R
M
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
EVTR
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
STAIR 4
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
BATH
BATH
BATH
POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
STAIR 6
EVTR
EVTR
TBD
TBD
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM MASTER
BEDROOM CLOS/
LAUND
MASTER
BATH BEDROOM
BATH
STORAGE
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
POWDER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
POWDER SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR 1
TRASH
HOLDING ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY10
9
4
3 2
1
VEST.
ELEV.
S MECH.
UP
RA
M
P
29
30
31
32
33
11
19C 21 22 23 24 27252618C17
ARRIVALS
28
+0'-0"
UP
13C
GENERATOR
6
5
8
7
16 20
15
TRASH
LIFT
STAIR 2
EV EV EV
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
14CON
T
R
O
L
A
R
M
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
12
EV EV EV
MECH.
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A2
A.P.
UNIT H
A.P.
UNIT J
A.P.
UNIT H
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT K
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A103
PARKING LEVEL
P1
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R3
FLOOR PLANS
PARKING LEVEL P1
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R3
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
3
3
'
-
8
1
2"
131'-71
2"
62
'
-
9
1 2"
150'-8"
76'-21 2"
111
'
-
3
1 2"
11
4
'
-
0
"
55
'
-
3
"
83'
-
4
1 2"
89
'
-
6
1
2"
4
4
'
-
2
"
1
3
'
-
1
1
"
16
'
-
0
1 2"
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BEDROOM BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM BEDROOM
BATH BATH
BATH
BATH
BATHBATH
BATH BATH
BATH BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH BATH
BATH
Revised
01.06.26
66
1
L.V.S.
UNIT A
STAIR 3
EHU
LOBBY
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
BUILDING
LOBBY
STAIR 1
ELEV.
REGISTRATION
OFFICE
MAIL
DELIVERY
POOL
LOBBY
POOL
MECH.
DN
DN
UP
UP
STAIR
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
T.
STOR.
STOR.
MECH.
TRASH
ROOM
EHU
UNIT
BEDROOM
BATH
T.
EHU
UNIT
EHU
UNIT EHU
UNIT
EHU
UNIT
BEDROOM
BATH
EHU
UNIT
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
EVTR
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
CLOSET
WC
BATH #1
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
#1
WC
BATH
MASTER
BATH
WC
CLOSET
MASTER
BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
BATH
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
CLOSET
LAUNDRY
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
DINING
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
STAIR 6
EVTRFOYER
FOYER
FOYER
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
WC
WC
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
DINING
CLOSET
CLOSET
CLOSET
BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
KITCHEN
DINING
DINING
L.V.S.
UNIT B
L.V.S.
UNIT C
L.V.S.
UNIT D
L.V.S.
UNIT E
L.V.S.
UNIT F
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A104
LEVEL R0
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R4
FLOOR PLANS
PARKING LEVEL P0
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R4
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
4
4
'
-
2
"
3
3
'
-
8
1
2"
166'-0"
80'-61 2"
111
'
-
3
1 2"
11
4
'
-
8
1 2"
55
'
-
3
"
89
'
-
6
1
2"
23'-41 2"
35
'
-
6
1
2"
80'-1"4'-0"
77'
-
8
1 2"
16
'
-
4
"
9'
-
4
"
31
'
-
8
"
14
'
-
8
"
544
'
-
0
"
1
3
'
-
1
1
1
2"
Revised
01.06.26
RLUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL P0
66
2
DN
DN
DN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
BATH
MASTER
BATH
WC
CLOSET
MASTER
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR 6
EVTR
STAIR 4
STAIR 5
EVTR
FOYER
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
FOYER
FOYER
EVTR
WC
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
DINING
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
CLOSET
CLOSET
CLOSET
WC
WC
WC
DINING
DINING
DINING
L.V.N.
UNIT E
STAIR
L.V.N.
UNIT G
(EHU)
UPDN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LAUND BATH
BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
L.V.N.
UNIT A
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER
BATH
FOYER
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT C
LAUND
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
L.V.S.
UNIT A
L.V.S.
UNIT B
L.V.S.
UNIT C
L.V.S.
UNIT D
L.V.S.
UNIT E
L.V.S.
UNIT F
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A105
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R5
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R1
FLOOR PLANS
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R1
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R5
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
172'-0"80'-6"
111
'
-
3
1 2"
11
4
'
-
8
1 2"
59
'
-
2
"
89
'
-
6
1
2"
17
'
-
8
"
4
4
'
-
2
"
27'-4"
16'-71 2"
31
'
-
6
"
80'
-
7
"
35'
-
6
1
2"
16
'
-
2
"
16
'
-
5
"
39
'
-
5
"
1
3
'
-
1
1
"
25'
-
5
"
25
'
-
0
1
2"
25
'
-
0
"
BATH
Revised
01.06.26
66
3
L.V.N.
UNIT E
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
L.V.N.
UNIT G
(EHU)
STAIR
UPDN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
LAUND BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER FOYER
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT C
LAUND
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATHBATH
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT A
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A106
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R2
FLOOR PLANS
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R2
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
172'-0"
59
'
-
2
"
16
'
-
2
"
80'-1"
16'-71 2"
31
'
-
6
"
80'
-
7
"
35'
-
6
1
2"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
ROOF PLAN
16
'
-
5
"
39
'
-
5
"
25'
-
5
"
25
'
-
0
1
2"
25
'
-
0
"
Revised
01.06.26
66
4
STAIR
UPDN
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER FOYERL.V.N.
UNIT E
L.V.N.
UNIT C
LAUND
BATH
BEDROOM
STAIR
UP
DN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
ELEVELEV
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
LAUND BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
FOYER
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT G
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATHBATH
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT A
BEDROOM
BATH
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A107
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R3
FLOOR PLANS
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R3
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
167'-0"
59
'
-
2
"
16
'
-
2
"
75'-1"
16'-71 2"
31
'
-
6
"
35'
-
6
1
2"
80'
-
7
"
16
'
-
5
"
39
'
-
5
"
25'
-
5
"
25
'
-
0
1
2"
25
'
-
0
"
Revised
01.06.26
66
5
DN
ELEVELEV
STAIR
DN
STAIR
DEN
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATHBATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT J
BEDROOM
L.V.N.
UNIT K
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BATH
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A108
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R4
FLOOR PLANS
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R4
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
114'-6"
54
'
-
6
"
72'-1"
19'-11 2"
31
'
-
3
1
2"
43'
-
9
1 2"
15
5
2
'
-
0
1
2"
16
'
-
5
"
39
'
-
5
"
11
4
1
'
-
9
1
2"
12'-0"
25'
-
5
"
25
'
-
0
1
2"
25
'
-
0
"
Revised
01.06.26
66
6
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8281.99'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'RIDGE 8278.5'
FLAT ROOF 8275'
EAVE 8277.36'
EAVE 8273.61'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.83'
COPING 8265.83'
RIDGE 8278.5'
EAVE 8273.61'
EAVE 8273.61'
EAVE 8272.38'
EAVE 8272.38'
EAVE 8273.28'
EAVE 8272.33'EAVE 8271.33'
EAVE 8271.39'
EAVE 8272.61'
EAVE 8271.39'
EAVE 8273.95'
EAVE 8273.5'
EAVE 8272.58'
EAVE 8272.33'
EAVE 8274'
RIDGE 8278.5'
FLAT ROOF 8263.5'
FLAT ROOF 8263.5'
COPING 8255.33'
COPING 8255.33'
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
3" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" /
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
EAVE 8246.42'
RIDGE 8251.88'
EAVE 8236.83'
PEAK 8254.24'
EAVE 8249.76'
EAVE 8249.76'
EAVE 8247'
EAVE 8241.27'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
EAVE 8239.68'
EAVE 8239.63'
EAVE 8242.11'
8239.47'
RIDGE 8247.5'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247.5'
RIDGE 8247.5'8247.5'
RIDGE 8247.5'
8247.5'
8247.5'
FLAT ROOF 8244.16'
FLAT ROOF 8244.16'
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" / 1'-0"
EAVE 8241.76'
EAVE 8239.41'
PEAK 8247.5'
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A109
FLOOR PLANS
ROOF PLAN
NO ROOF OVERHANG SHALL
EXCEED 4'-0", TYPICAL UNLESS
NOTED OTHERWISE
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
Revised
01.06.26
66
7
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
SE
T
B
A
C
K
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
4'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
KEYPLAN EXTERIOR MATERIALS
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
METAL FAUX
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
Revised
01.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A201
1/8" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION OVERALL 02
1
1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION OVERALL 01
2
66
8
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
12
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
13
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
4'
-
6
"
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
KEYPLAN EXTERIOR MATERIALS
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
METAL FAUX
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
1/8" = 1'-0"2 NORTH BLDG WEST ELEVATION - 02
Revised
01.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A202
1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH BLDG WEST ELEVATION - 01
2 1
66
9
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
4'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE 11
'
-
0
"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
4'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
KEYPLAN EXTERIOR MATERIALS
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
METAL FAUX
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
4'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
1/8" = 1'-0"2 NORTH BLDG NORTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH BLDG SOUTH ELEVATION Revised
01.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A203
2
1
1/8" = 1'-0"3 NORTH BLDG SOUTH ELEVATION 02
3
67
0
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8209' -0"
R5-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR
8191' -0"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
WEST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8254' -0 1/2"
56
'
-
6
"
18
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR*
8191' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLR (P1)
8209' -0"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' -0"
EAST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8209' -0"
R5-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR
8191' -0"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
WEST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8254' -0 1/2"
EAST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8251' -2"
18
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
18
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
56
'
-
6
"
56
'
-
6
"
EXTERIOR MATERIALS
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
METAL FAUX
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
KEYPLAN
Revised
01.06.26
APOLLO PARK / LUNAR
PARK AT VAIL
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A204
1/8" = 1'-0"2 RIVERFRONT SOUTHWEST ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"1 RIVERFRONT SOUTH ELEVATION 4' 8'16'0
2"0
1/8" = 1'-0"
4' 8'16'0
2"0
1/8" = 1'-0"
1267
1
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8209' -0"
R5-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR
8191' -0"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
TOP OF PLATE
8238' -6"
WEST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8254' -0 1/2"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'-
6
"
9'-
0
"
6'-
6
1
/
2
"
56
'
-
6
"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8209' -0"
R5-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR
8191' -0"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
TOP OF PLATE
8238' -6"
WEST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8254' -0 1/2"LINE OF NORTH BUILDING IN
FOREGROUND
6'-
6
1
/
2
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
56
'
-
6
"
EXTERIOR MATERIALS
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
METAL FAUX
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
KEYPLAN
Revised
01.06.26
APOLLO PARK / LUNAR
PARK AT VAIL
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A205
1/8" = 1'-0"2 RIVERFRONT WEST ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"1 RIVERFRONT NORTHWEST ELEVATION
4' 8'16'0
2"0
1/8" = 1'-0"
4' 8'16'0
2"0
1/8" = 1'-0"
1
2
672
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR*
8191' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLR (P1)
8209' -0"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' -0"
EAST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
LVS EAVE
8238' -6"
EAST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8251' -2"
18
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
56
'
-
6
"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR*
8191' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLR (P1)
8209' -0"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' -0"
EAST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8209' -0"
R5-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR
8191' -0"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
WEST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8254' -0 1/2"EAST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8251' -2"
18
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
56
'
-
6
"
38
'
-
6
"
18
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
38
'
-
6
"
EXTERIOR MATERIALS
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
METAL FAUX
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
KEYPLAN
1/8" = 1'-0"2 RIVERFRONT NORTH ELEVATION Revised
01.06.26
APOLLO PARK / LUNAR
PARK AT VAIL
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A206
1/8" = 1'-0"1 REVERFRONT EAST ELEVATION
4' 8'16'0
2"0
1/8" = 1'-0"
4' 8'16'0
2"0
1/8" = 1'-0"
1
2
673
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
4'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
EXTERIOR MATERIALS
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
METAL FAUX
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL CABLE
RAILING
Revised
01.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A241
3/16" = 1'-0"1 TYPICAL ENLARGED ELEVATION - LUNAR VAIL NORTH
3/16" = 1'-0"2 TYPICAL ENLARGED ELEVATION - APOLLO PARK
3/16" = 1'-0"3 TYPICAL ENLARGED ELEVATION - LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
030104
04
08
08 08
01
07
06
05
06
02
07
01
02
02
06
07
01 03
06
02
06
67
4
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.2528
EXISTING
GRADE
FINISH
GRADE
LN1 8273.6 8217.5 8223.0 56.1 50.6
LN2 8278.5 8219.7 8221.5 58.8 57.0
LN3 8278.5 8217.7 8220.0 60.8 58.5
LN4 8278.5 8217.5 8222.0 61.0 56.5
LN5 8278.5 8216.3 8221.0 62.2 57.5
LN6 8278.5 8211.7 8214.5 66.8 64.0
LN7 8273.3 8209.3 8212.0 64.0 61.3
LN8 8272.6 8208.3 8208.5 64.3 64.1
LN9 8265.7 8206.7 8207.0 59.0 58.7
LN10 8265.7 8206.5 8206.5 59.2 59.2
LN11 8278.5 8208.7 8208.7 69.8 69.8
LN12 8278.5 8208.9 8208.9 69.6 69.6
LN13 8265.7 8206.6 8207.5 59.1 58.2
LN14 8278.5 8209.5 8210.5 69.0 68.0
LN15 8278.5 8212.0 8218.0 66.5 60.5
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES NORTH
MAXIMUM BUILDING
HEIGHT
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES AND APOLLO PARK
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATION
ROOF RIDGE/
ROOF EAVE
ROOF RIDGE/
EAVE
ELEVATION
EXISTING
GRADE
FINISH
GRADE
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
3" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" /
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
EAVE 8246.42'
RIDGE 8251.88'
EAVE 8236.83'
PEAK 8254.24'
EAVE 8249.76'
EAVE 8249.76'
EAVE 8247'RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
EAVE 8239.68'
EAVE 8239.63'
EAVE 8242.11'
EAVE 8239.47'
RIDGE 8247.5'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247.5'
RIDGE 8247.5'8247.5'
RIDGE 8247.5'
8247.5'
8247.5'
FLAT ROOF 8244.66'
FLAT ROOF 8244.66'
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" / 1'-0"
EAVE 8241.76'
EAVE 8239.41'
PEAK 8247.5'
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" / 1'-0"
EAVE 8241.27'
EAVE 8239.47'
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8281.99'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'RIDGE 8278.5'
FLAT ROOF 8275'
EAVE 8277.36'
EAVE 8273.61'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.83'
COPING 8265.83'
RIDGE 8278.5'
EAVE 8273.61'
EAVE 8273.61'
EAVE 8272.38'
EAVE 8272.38'
EAVE 8273.28'
EAVE 8272.33'EAVE 8271.33'
EAVE 8271.39'
EAVE 8272.61'
EAVE 8271.39'
EAVE 8273.95'
EAVE 8273.5'
EAVE 8272.58'
EAVE 8272.33'
EAVE 8274'
RIDGE 8278.5'
FLAT ROOF 8263.5'
FLAT ROOF 8263.5'
COPING 8255.33'
COPING 8255.33'
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
3" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" /
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
EAVE 8246.42'
RIDGE 8251.88'
EAVE 8236.83'
PEAK 8254.24'
EAVE 8249.76'
EAVE 8249.76'
EAVE 8247'RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
EAVE 8239.68'
EAVE 8239.63'
EAVE 8242.11'
EAVE 8239.47'
RIDGE 8247.5'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247.5'
RIDGE 8247.5'8247.5'
RIDGE 8247.5'
8247.5'
8247.5'
FLAT ROOF 8244.66'
FLAT ROOF 8244.66'
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" / 1'-0"
EAVE 8241.76'
EAVE 8239.41'
PEAK 8247.5'
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" / 1'-0"
EAVE 8241.27'
EAVE 8239.47'
LS1
LS9
LS10
LS5
LS8
LS12
LS13
LS15
LS3
LS2
LS14
LN1LN5
LN4
LN14
LN13
LN11
LN9 LN7
LN8
LN6 LN3
LN2
LN12
BUILDING HEIGHT PLAN DIAGRAM
GRADING KEY
INDICATES EXISTING GRADE
INDICATES PROPOSED
GRADE
LS4
8208
LN10
LS11
LN16
0000 INDICATES POINT OF
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
BUILDING HEIGHT TABLE KEY
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A801
ES PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25
LS16
LS6
LS7
ELEVATOR OVERRUN
BRISE SOLEIL
T/ WALL 8218.8'
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LS1 8247.5 8198.0 8191.0 49.5 56.5
LS2 8247.0 8206.3 8208.0 40.7 39.0
LS3 8246.0 8206.5 8208.0 39.5 38.0
LS4 8247.5 8205.5 8206.0 42.0 41.5
LS5 8241.3 8201.9 8191.9 39.4 49.4
LS6 8247.0 8199.5 8191.0 47.5 56.0
LS7 8247.0 8197.6 8190.5 49.4 56.5
LS8 8247.0 8194.0 8190.5 53.0 56.5
LS9 8247.5 8203.5 8191.0 44.0 56.5
LS10 8236.8 8188.5 8190.5 48.3 46.3
LS11 8247.0 8193.0 8190.5 54.0 56.5
LS12 8239.5 8200.5 8193.0 39.0 46.5
LS13 8254.2 8205.3 8208.0 48.9 46.2
LS14 8246.4 8202.0 8208.0 44.4 38.4
LS15 8251.9 8203.5 8208.0 48.4 43.9
LS16 8247.5 8202.3 8204.5 45.2 43.0
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES SOUTH & APOLLO PARK
EXISTING
GRADE
FINISH
GRADE
MAXIMUM BUILDING
HEIGHT
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES AND APOLLO PARK
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATION
ROOF RIDGE/
ROOF EAVE
ROOF RIDGE/
EAVE
ELEVATION
EXISTING
GRADE
FINISH
GRADE
67
5
R0-LVN GROUND FLOOR
8222' -0"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
ALTUS LEVEL 1
8226' -0"
ALTUS ROOF RIDGE
8284' -0"
ALTUS ROOF RIDGE
8284' -0"
5'-
6
"
15
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
0
"
56
'
-
6
"
58
'
-
0
"
(+
/
-
)
4
'
-
6
"
62
'
-
6
"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -6"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
VMVR RIDGE
8250' -0"
18
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
6
"
9'-
6
"
39
'
-
0
"
VMVR LEVEL 2
8206' -0"
VMVR LEVEL 3
8216' -6"
VMVR LEVEL 4
8227' -0"
VMVR LEVEL 5
8236' -6"
13
'
-
6
"
9'-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
44
'
-
0
"
P2 -PARKING*
8199' -6"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A802
CONCEPTUAL HEIGHT IN CONTEXT -
LUNAR VAIL NORTH AND ALTUS
VAIL NORTH ELEVATIONS
CONCEPTUAL HEIGHT IN CONTEXT -
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH / APOLLO PARK
AND VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW
RESIDENCES NORTH ELEVATIONS
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES SOUTH
& APOLLO PARK TIMESHARE
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES NORTH ALTUS VAIL
676
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
R0-LVN GROUND FLOOR
8222' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR (P3)
8191' -0"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8209' -0"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -6"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
ALTUS LEVEL 1
8226' -0"
ALTUS ROOF RIDGE
8284' -0"
VMVR RIDGE
8250' -0"
2'-
6
"
18
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
6
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
15
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
0
"
13
'
-
6
"
5'-
6
"
VMVR LEVEL 1
8195' -6"
56
'
-
6
"
52
'
-
0
"
4'-
6
"
TOP OF PLATE*
8240' -6"
TOP OF PLATE*
8240' -6"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
VMVR RIDGE
8250' -0"
2'-
6
"
7'-
0
"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A803
CONTEXTUAL SITE SECTION THRU
ALTUS VAIL AND VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES LOOKING EAST
APOLLO WEST GABLE PROFILE
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
AMME
11111111111141411111111111111111
MM MM
APOLLO PARK
TIMESHARE BEYOND
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW
RESIDENCES OUTLINED
IN RED
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES SOUTH
BEYOND
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES NORTH
BEYOND
VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES
WEST ELEVATION OF ALTUS VAIL IN
FOREGROUND, OUTLINED IN BLUE.
FOR ELEVATION REFERENCE ONLY.
ACTUAL WIDTH MAY DIFFER FROM
SHOWN
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW WEST GABLE PROFILE AT EAST ELEVATIONAPOLLO PARK TIMESHARE GABLE PROFILE AT WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
677
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW
RESIDENCES
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH AND
APOLLO PARK TIMESHARE
LUNAR VAIL NORTH
THE WRENGORE CREEK
TYROLEAN
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A811
VOLUMETRIC GRADE PROJECTION -
SHOWN AT 50' ABOVE GRADE
678
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW
RESIDENCES
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH AND
APOLLO PARK TIMESHARE
LUNAR VAIL NORTH
THE WRENGORE CREEK
TYROLEAN
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A812
VOLUMETRIC GRADE PROJECTION -
SHOWN AT 60' ABOVE GRADE
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
679
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW
RESIDENCES
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH AND
APOLLO PARK TIMESHARE
LUNAR VAIL NORTH
THE WRENGORE CREEK
TYROLEAN
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A813
VOLUMETRIC GRADE PROJECTION -
SHOWN AT 70' ABOVE GRADE
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
680
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A901
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SUMMER SOLSTICE @ 10:00 AM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SUMMER SOLSTICE @ 2:00 PM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SUMMER SOLSTICE @ 4:00 PM
SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS -SUMMER
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SUMMER
SOLSTICE @ 10:00 AM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SUMMER
SOLSTICE @ 2:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SUMMER
SOLSTICE @ 4:00 PM
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
681
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A902
SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS -SPRING / FALL
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
EQUINOX @ 10:00 AM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
EQUINOX @ 2:00 PM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
EQUINOX @ 4:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT EQUINOX
@ 10:00 AM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT EQUINOX
@ 2:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT EQUINOX
@ 4:00 PM
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
682
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIM
ESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIM
ESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIM
ESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A903
SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS -WINTER
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 10:00 AM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 2:00 PM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 4:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 10:00 AM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 2:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 4:00 PM
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
683
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
2 Addendum #2 - March 16, 2020
4 Addendum #4 - April 6, 2020
5 Addendum #5 - April 16, 2020
6 Addendum #6 - April 28, 2020
7 Addendum #7 - May 18, 2020
B2 Bulletin #2 - October 19, 2020
B3 Bulletin #3 - November 6, 2020
B4 Bulletin #4 - December 10, 2020
B5 Bulletin #5 - March 1, 2021
B6 Bulletin #6 - March 3, 2021
B7 Bulletin #7 - April 12, 2021
B8 Bulletin #8 - July 22, 2021
B9 Bulletin #9 - July 26, 2021
B10 Bulletin #10 - November 16, 2021
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A901
68
4
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
AP
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
M
U
L
T
I
-
FA
M
I
L
Y
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
C
I
A
L
VA
I
L
A
E
R
I
A
L
L
A
D
D
E
R
MO
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
C1
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
PROPOSED NEW
FIRE HYDRANT
PROPOSED NEW
FIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
TO REMAIN
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN -
ACCESSIBLE FROM ALTUS/MOUNTAIN
VIEW FIRE ACCESS
ACCESSIBLE VIA FIRE FIGHTER FROM
APOLLO PRIMARY ROUTE FIRE STAGING
AREA
FIRE FIGHTER ACCESS
FIRE FIGHTER ACCESS
PRIMARY FIRE APPARATUS
ACCESS DRIVE
EXISITNG FIRE DEPARTMENT
ACCESS ROUTE TO REMAIN
FIRE FIGHTER ACCESS
PRIMARY AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS
ACCESS AND STAGING AREA
(SIGNED WITH "NO PARKING FIRE LANE")
C101
68
5
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A901
68
6
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
#
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A901
68
7
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A901
68
8
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25G001
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
SURVEY
V001 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 1 OF 5
V002 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 2 OF 5
V003 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 3 OF 5
V004 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 4 OF 5
V005 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 5 OF 5
CIVIL
C100 EXISTING CONDITIONS
C101 AERIAL LADDER ACCESS & FIRE STAGING
C200 SITE AND GRADING PLAN
C300 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN
C400 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND GARAGE
A027 AREA PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R3
A028 AREA PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R4
A031 SITE CONTEXT AND MASSING PERSPECTIVES
A032 SITE CONTEXT AND MASSING PERSPECTIVES
A033 SITE CONTEXT AND MASSING PERSPECTIVES
A041 SITE SECTIONS
A042 SITE SECTIONS
A051 PARKING PLAN LEVEL P3
A052 PARKING PLAN LEVEL P2
A053 PARKING PLAN LEVEL P1
A054 NOT USED
A101 FLOOR PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P3/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R1
A102 FLOOR PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P2/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R2
A103 FLOOR PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P1/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R3
A104 FLOOR PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R0/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R4
A105 FLOOR PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R1/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R5
A106 FLOOR PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R2/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R6
A107 FLOOR PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R3/
SOUTH BUILDINGS ROOF
A108 FLOOR PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R4
A109 NORTH BUILDING ROOF PLAN
A201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A202 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A203 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A014 SITE LIGHTING PLAN
A015 SITE LIGHTING LUNAR VAIL NORTH
A016 SITE LIGHTING LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
A017 SITE LIGHTING APOLLO PARK
A021 AREA PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P3/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R1
A022 AREA PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P2/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R2
A023 AREA PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P1/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R3
A024 AREA PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R0/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R4
A025 AREA PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R1/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R5
A026 AREA PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R2/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R6
LANDSCAPE
L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN
L101 LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN
L200 LANDSCAPE LIGHTING PLAN
L300 LANDSCAPE DETAILS / FIRE ACCESS PATH PLAN
ARCHITECTURAL
A001 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
A002 EXISTING VS PROPOSED SETBACK DIAGRAM
A003 BUILDING AREA IN SETBACK
A004 SITE ACCESS DIAGRAM
A010 SITE COVERAGE PLAN ABOVE GROUND
A011 SITE COVEREAGE PLAN BELOW GROUND
A012 SITE COVERAGE PLAN ROOF LEVEL
A013 SITE LIGHTING FIXTURES
A204 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A205 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A206 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A241 EXTERIOR MATERIALS KEY ELEVATIONS
A801 BUILDING HEIGHT PLAN DIAGRAM
A802 BUILDING HEIGHT CONTEXT ELEVATION
DIAGRAM
A803 BUILDING HEIGHT CONTEXT ELEVATION
DIAGRAM
A811 BUILDING HEIGHT VOLUMETRIC DIAGRAM- 50'
A812 BUILDING HEIGHT VOLUMETRIC DIAGRAM- 60'
A813 BUILDING HEIGHT VOLUMETRIC DIAGRAM- 70'
A901 SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS - SUMMER SOLSTICE
A902 SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS - SPRING / FALL
EQUINOXES
A903 SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS - WINTER SOLSTICE
INDEX
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
689
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A803
69
0
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A803
69
1
Post Office Box 2134 Eagle, Colorado 81631 p: 970.949.3286 f: 970.328.6084
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A803
69
2
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A803
69
3
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 1 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK: APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY: RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE:05.08.2025
VICINITY MAP
~ NOT TO SCALE ~
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 1 OF 5
A PORTION OF TRACT D, VAIL VILLAGE FIFTH FILING, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT D;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 325.19 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT D TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 70;
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 71 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 125.32 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST 110.45 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 35.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST 35.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 133.46 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF TRACT D;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT D, SOUTH 47 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST 137.0
FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT D, SOUTH 79 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 145.78 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING,
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN BUILDINGS A AND B, APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF
FILED FOR RECORD AND CONDOMINIUM DECLARATIONS FOR APOLLO PARK AT VAIL.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NO. ABC50063954-5
1. MONUMENTS AT ALL MAJOR PROPERTY CORNERS HAVE BEEN FOUND OR SET AS SHOWN HEREON.
2. THE ADDRESSES LISTED ON THE TITLE COMMITMENT IS- 442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
EAGLE COUNTY PARCEL NO'S - 2101-082-27-006 & 2101-082-46-039
3. PER FEMA MAP NUMBER: 08037C0488D HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 12/04/2007, THE SITE IS LOCATED IN ZONE X BEING DEFINED AS
AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN.
4. THE GROSS LAND AREA: 56,347 SQUARE FEET OR 1.293 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
5. VERTICAL RELIEF SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON A POST PROCESSED STATIC GNSS CONNECTION MADE TO NGS POINT SPRADDLE (PID:
AB2083) BEING A FOUND STANDARD NGS ROCK CAP IN A ROCK OUTCROPPING AS NOTED IN THE NGS DATA SHEET AND HAVING A
PUBLISHED ELEVATION PER TOWN OF VAIL GPS CONTROL 2022 MAP OF 8287.38' (NAVD88)
CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN HEREON AT 1' INTERVALS
6(a). NO ZONING REPORT OR LETTER WAS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CLIENT OR THE CLIENT’S
DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE - PER THE OFFICIAL TOWN OF VAIL ZONING MAP ADOPTED BY TOWN COUNCIL PER RESOLUTION NO. 13,
SERIES OF 2000, OCTOBER 17, 2000 - MAP UPDATED JUNE 21, 2024 - THE SUBJECT PARCEL IS ZONE HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE-FAMILY
(HDMF)
6(b). NO ZONING REPORT OR LETTER WAS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CLIENT OR THE CLIENT’S
DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE
8. SUBSTANTIAL FEATURES OBSERVED IN THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK ARE SHOWN HEREON.
9. THERE WERE THIRTY-FOUR (34) OBSERVED FULL REGULAR PARKING SPOTS, THREE (3) HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPOTS AND
THREE (3) WHAT APPEAR TO BE TRANSPORT VAN PARKING SPOTS.
11(a). NO PLANS AND/OR REPORTS WERE PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT
11(b). UTILITY LOCATES WERE PROVIDED BY ACCURATE UNDERGROUND, LTD.
13. NAMES OF ADJOINING OWNERS ACCORDING TO CURRENT TAX RECORDS ARE SHOWN HEREON.
16. DURING THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK, THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT EARTH MOVING WORK, BUILDING
CONSTRUCTION, OR BUILDING ADDITIONS OBSERVED.
17. DURING THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK, THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT STREET OR SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION
OR REPAIRS OBSERVED AND NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CONTROLLING JURISDICTION CONCERNING
PROPOSED CHANGES IN STREET RIGHT OF WAY LINES.
20. GRAVITY FED PIPE INVERT ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON.
OPTIONAL TABLE A ITEMS: (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(a), 6(b), 7(a), 7(b)(1), 7(c), 8, 9, 11(a)(b), 13, 16, 17 AND 20)
THIS CERTIFICATION DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED PERSONS OR LEGAL ENTITIES WITHOUT WRITTEN RECERTIFICATION EXPRESSLY
NAMING SUCH PERSONS OR LEGAL ENTITIES.
TO OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AND LUNAR VAIL LAND INVESTMENTS, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2021 MINIMUM
STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND
INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(a), 6(b), 8, 9, 11(a)(b), 13, 16, 17 AND 20 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELDWORK WAS COMPLETED ON MAY 5, 2025.
PURSUANT TO COLORADO REVISED STATUTE 38-51-106 (1)(D) AND COLORADO STATE BOARD OF LICENSURE FOR PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYORS RULE 1.6(B)(2), THE UNDERSIGNED FURTHER CERTIFIES THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE, IS
BASED UPON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE, AND THIS
CERTIFICATION IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
DATE OF MAP/PLAT:
05.08.2025
RY P. RUSK, PLS 38226
EMAIL: RRUSK@FORESIGHTWEST.COM
SIGNATURE AND DATE THROUGH SEAL:
(REQUIRED BY COLORADO LAW)
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION:
1. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS DISCLOSURE REQUIRED PER 13-80-105, C.R.S.:
NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS
AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN
TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.
2. STATEMENT OF LINEAL UNITS REQUIRED PER 38-51-106(1)(L), C.R.S.: LINEAL UNIT OF MEASURE USED IN THIS SURVEY IS U.S. SURVEY FOOT.
3. THE BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY REPRESENT A PROFESSIONAL OPINION BY THIS SURVEYOR AS TO WHERE THE BOUNDARY LINES
HEREBY RETRACED WERE ORIGINALLY LAID OUT ON THE GROUND AND SUBSEQUENTLY ACCEPTED BY THE AFFECTED LAND OWNERS. THE
DISCOVERY OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE MAY RESULT IN A DIFFERENT OPINION.
4. ALL COPYRIGHTS TO PUBLICATIONS BY FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING, INC. ARE RESERVED. ADDITIONALLY, ALL FIELD BOOKS, NOTES, SKETCHES
AND ELECTRONIC FILES ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE SOLE PROPERTY OF FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING, INC. IF THIS
SURVEY IS DEPOSITED WITH THE COUNTY IN COMPLIANCE WITH 38-51-107, C.R.S., FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING, INC. ACCEPTS NO LIABILITY FROM
PROPRIETARY OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION DISCLOSED TO THE PUBLIC BY THE CONTENTS HEREIN.
5. PRESERVATION OF BOUNDARY MONUMENTATION: ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES:
1) ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT (DEFINED BY 38-53-103(18), C.R.S. AS ANY LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT ESTABLISHED ON THE GROUND BY A
CADASTRAL SURVEY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND ANY MINERAL SURVEY MONUMENT ESTABLISHED BY A UNITED STATES MINERAL
SURVEYOR AND MADE A PART OF THE UNITED STATES PUBLIC LAND RECORDS), OR
2) ANY LAND SURVEY CORNER (DEFINED BY 38-53-103(6), C.R.S. AS ANY LAND SURVEY CORNER THE POSITION OF WHICH CONTROLS THE LOCATION OF
THE BOUNDARIES OF A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND), OR A RESTORATION OF ANY SUCH MONUMENT, EVEN IF SAID PERSON HAS TITLE TO THE LAND ON
WHICH SAID MONUMENT IS LOCATED, COMMITS A CLASS 2 MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY A FINE OF UP TO $1,000 AND/OR 1 YEAR IN JAIL UNLESS,
PRIOR TO SUCH REMOVAL, SAID PERSON HAS CAUSED A COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR TO ESTABLISH AT LEAST TWO WITNESS
CORNERS OR REFERENCE MARKS FOR EACH SUCH MONUMENT REMOVED AND HAS FILED OR CAUSED TO BE FILED A MONUMENT RECORD PURSUANT
TO ARTICLE 53 OF TITLE 38, C.R.S. (18-4-508, C.R.S.)
6. OIL, GAS, COAL, MINERAL, WATER, DITCH, RESERVOIR, GEOTHERMAL, AVIGATION, GRAZING OR OTHER RIGHTS, AS WELL AS DEVELOPMENT, ZONING,
LEASE, FIRE DISTRICT OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS, BOTH RECORDED AND UNRECORDED, MAY AFFECT THIS PROPERTY AND NOT BE PLOTTABLE
GRAPHICALLY HEREON.
7. THE LOCATIONS OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT TO BE CONSIDERED ALL-INCLUSIVE AND MAY BE INACCURATE.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS MAY HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM AVAILABLE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND AS-BUILT MAPS, SURFACE MARKINGS
ESTABLISHED BY INDEPENDENT LOCATORS OR UTILITY COMPANIES, OR FROM SURFACE FEATURES. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON HAVE
NOT BEEN EXPOSED BY THIS FIRM AND MAY VARY IN ACTUAL LOCATION, USAGE, MATERIAL, SIZE AND/OR EXISTENCE. THIS FIRM ACCEPTS NO
LIABILITY FOR INACCURATE WORK BY UTILITY LOCATORS. PER TITLE 9, ARTICLE 1.5, C.R.S., UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MUST BE MARKED PRIOR TO ANY
DIGGING OR DRILLING BY SUBMITTING A REQUEST TO THE UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO. CALL (811) AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE.
NO UTILITY PLANS WERE PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT IN REGARD TO TABLE A ITEM 11(A). PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES WERE PROVIDED BY ACCURATE
UNDERGROUND, LTD.
8. ANY OVERHEAD WIRES SHOWN HEREON ARE GENERALIZED LOCATIONS SHOWING THE WIRE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN UTILITY POLES AND OTHER
STRUCTURES. THE LOCATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL WIRES WERE NOT MEASURED AND THEIR REPRESENTATION ON THIS DRAWING SHOULD NOT BE RELIED
UPON WHERE ACCURATE CLEARANCE DISTANCES FROM OVERHEAD WIRES ARE REQUIRED.
9. ALL USERS OF THIS SURVEY ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT THIS SURVEY IN NO WAY CONSTITUTES A TITLE SEARCH BY FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING
INC. FOR DETERMINATION OF (A)RIGHT TO TITLE, (B)CHAIN OF TITLE/ABSTRACT, (C)THE HISTORICAL COMPATIBILITY OF ALL DESCRIPTIONS OF THIS
PROPERTY WITH ALL DESCRIPTIONS OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES, AND (D)EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD THAT
MAY IMPACT TITLE TO THIS PROPERTY. ADDITIONALLY, UNWRITTEN RIGHTS TO THIS PROPERTY MAY EXIST WHICH ARE UNKNOWN TO THIS FIRM. A
REASONABLE EFFORT WAS MADE TO RESEARCH THE RECORDS FOR THIS PROPERTY AND THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
USUAL AND CUSTOMARY STANDARD OF CARE FOR LAND SURVEYORS PRACTICING IN COLORADO.
10. TITLE POLICY REFERENCE: FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING RIGHT TO TITLE AND EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR OTHER TITLE BURDENS
AFFECTING SUCH RIGHT TO TITLE TO THIS PROPERTY, THIS SURVEY RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT ISSUED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, ORDER NO. ABC50063954-5, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 12.27.2024 AT 5:00 P.M..
11. BUILDING SETBACK NOTICE: DUE TO FREQUENT CHANGES IN AND DIFFERING INTERPRETATIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCES, THE OWNER IS URGED
TO CONTACT THE GOVERNING MUNICIPALITY(IES) FOR GUIDANCE RELATING TO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO PLANNING FUTURE
IMPROVEMENTS ON THIS PROPERTY. NO ZONING REPORT OR LETTER CITING SETBACK RESTRICTIONS WAS PROVIDED.
12. BASIS OF BEARINGS STATEMENT REQUIRED PER 38-51-106(1)(E), C.R.S.:
BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON THE EAST LINE OF THE CONDOMINIUM MAP OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION RECORDED SEPT. 5, 1978 AT REC. NO.
171103 AND AMENDED CONDOMINIUM MAP OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION RECORDED JUNE 9, 1981 AT REC. NO. 220646 BEING MONUMENTED
AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER BY A FOUND NO.4 REBAR WITH A 1.25" RED CAP STAMPED IN PART "PLS 27958" AND AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER BY A
FOUND NO.4 REBAR WITH THE LINE BETWEEN ASSUMED TO BEAR SOUTH 00° 02' 00" WEST PER SAID CONDOMINIUM MAPS.
13. VERTICAL RELIEF SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON A POST PROCESSED STATIC GNSS CONNECTION MADE TO NGS POINT SPRADDLE (PID: AB2083)
BEING A FOUND STANDARD NGS ROCK CAP IN A ROCK OUTCROPPING AS NOTED IN THE NGS DATA SHEET AND HAVING A PUBLISHED ELEVATION PER
TOWN OF VAIL GPS CONTROL 2022 MAP OF 8287.38' (NAVD88) - CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN HEREON AT 1' INTERVALS
14. MEASURED DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON REFLECT THE RESULTS OF A LEAST SQUARES ADJUSTMENT OF THE FIELD MEASUREMENTS.
15. ALL FOUND AND SET MONUMENTS ARE FAIRLY CLOSE TO GROUND SURFACE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
16. THIS SURVEY WAS HAMPERED BY SNOW COVER WHICH MAY HAVE CONCEALED FEATURES NOT SHOWN HEREON.
17. ANY MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON THAT ARE NOT TIED TO THIS SURVEY WERE NOT USED AS CONTROL CORNERS AND ARE SHOWN FOR
POSTERITY ONLY.
18. PER THE TOWN OF VAIL WATERCOURSE SETBACK MAP, GORE CREEK, WHICH IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO A 50'
SETBACK REQUIREMENT AS MEASURED FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE ESTABLISHED CREEK OR STREAM CHANNEL USING THE PRIMARY DEFINITION
OF "CHANNEL" AS SET FORTH IN WEBSTER'S II NEW RIVERSIDE UNIVERSITY DICTIONARY: "CHANNEL - A STREAM OR RIVERBED". - SAID SETBACK IS
SHOWN HEREON.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS, OR CLAIMS THEREOF, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT THAT COULD BE ASCERTAINED BY AN
INSPECTION OF THE LAND OR THAT MAY BE ASSERTED BY PERSONS IN POSSESSION OF THE LAND. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
2. EASEMENTS, LIENS OR ENCUMBRANCES, OR CLAIMS THEREOF, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
3. ANY ENCROACHMENT, ENCUMBRANCE, VIOLATION, VARIATION, OR ADVERSE CIRCUMSTANCE AFFECTING THE TITLE THAT WOULD BE
DISCLOSED BY AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE LAND SURVEY OF THE LAND AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. (STANDARD
EXCEPTION)
4. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL HERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT
SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
5. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CLAIMS OR OTHER MATTERS, IF ANY, CREATED, FIRST APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR
ATTACHING SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF BUT PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE PROPOSED INSURED ACQUIRES OF RECORD
FOR VALUE THE ESTATE OR INTEREST OR MORTGAGE THEREON COVERED BY THIS COMMITMENT. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
6. (A) TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITY THAT LEVIES TAXES
OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS; (B) PROCEEDINGS BY A PUBLIC AGENCY THAT MAY RESULT IN TAXES
OR ASSESSMENTS, OR NOTICES OF SUCH PROCEEDINGS, WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN BY THE RECORDS OF SUCH AGENCY OR BY THE PUBLIC
RECORDS. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
7. (A) UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C)
WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
8. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES, IF ANY. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
9. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE
OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 11, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475. (IMPACTS
SUBJECT PROPERTY - NOT PLOTTABLE)
10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES
PATENT RECORDED JULY 11, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475. (IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - NOT PLOTTABLE - NO DITCHES OR CANALS
WERE OBSERVED DURING THE COURSE OF THE FIELD SURVEY)
11. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GROUND LEASE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 05, 1978 IN BOOK 274 AT PAGE 693 AND ASSIGNMENT
THERETO RECORDED NOVEMBER 17, 1978 IN BOOK 278 AT PAGE 682.
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF GROUND LEASE RECORDED JUNE 27, 2006 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200616928.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - NOT A SURVEY MATTER)
12. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF VAIL VILLAGE FIFTH FILING RECORDED
NOVEMBER 12, 1966 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 102538 AND THE MAP OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1978 IN BOOK 274 AT
PAGE 697. (IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
13. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF SERVICE AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1978 IN BOOK 275 AT PAGE 599.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
14. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR
RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY,
HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE
EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER
15, 1965, IN BOOK 187 AT PAGE 353, AMENDMENT RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1984 IN BOOK 393 AT PAGE 492, AMENDMENT RECORDED JANUARY
15, 1987 IN BOOK 455 AT PAGE 933, AND AMENDMENT RECORDED AUGUST 2, 1989 IN BOOK 488 AT PAGE 378.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - NO RESTRICTIONS APPEAR TO BE SURVEY MATTERS)
15. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DECLARATION BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE,
COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY,
OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR
RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 05, 1978 IN BOOK 274 AT PAGE 696.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - APPURTENANT EASEMENTS CONTAINED WITHIN SAID DOCUMENT ARE NOT PLOTTABLE AND ARE BLANKET
IN NATURE.)
16. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF CABLE TELEVISION EASEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 08, 1997 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 611627.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - BLANKET IN NATURE OVER ALL OF TRACT 3, VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING - NOT PLOTTABLE)
17. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN EASEMENT DEED RECORDED
JUNE 19, 1980 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200646. (IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
18. 40' ACCESS EASEMENT, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, SHOWN ON INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 09, 1981, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 220646.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - APPROXIMATE SCALED LOCATION PLOTTED HEREON - NO DIMENSIONS ON PLOTTED)
19. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS
EASEMENTS AND TERMINATION OF SERVICE AGREEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 05, 2008 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200825627.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
SHEDULE B, PART II - EXCEPTIONS - OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NO. ABC50063954-5
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
4
1
:
3
3
A
M
69
4
SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING EASEMENT
ALIQUOT LINE
FOUND REBAR AND CAP AS DESCRIBED HEREON
FOUND REBAR - NO CAP AS DESCRIBED HEREON
FOUND ALIQUOT CORNER AS DESCRIBED HEREON
SET MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED HEREON
(R) - RECORD BEARING & DISTANCES PER THE APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION CONDOMINIUM PLAT RECORDED
AT REC. NO.'S 220646 & 17113
(R1) - RECORD BEARING & DISTANCE PER THE ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES CONDOMINIUM PLAT RECORDED AT REC. NO.
202124189 AND THE VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE GREEK RECORDED AT REC. NO. 202211953
(M) - FIELD MEASURED BEARING & DISTANCES
50' STREAM SETBACK
EDGE OF WATER AS OF 04.14.2025
CENTER-LINE OF GORE CREEK AS OF 04.14.2025
F1
F5
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598" UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598"
UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
F3
F1
F1
F3
F1
S7
1
°
3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
9
9
.
9
4
'
(
M
)
N7
1
°
4
0
'
2
2
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
3
'
(
M
)
N02°51'12"W(M)
35.44'(M)
N48
°
0
2
'
4
8
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
M
)
N7
9
°
4
7
'
5
3
"
W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N7
9
°
4
6
'
0
0
"
W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
R
)
N47
°
5
5
'
0
7
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
R
)
N02°55'07"W(R)(R1)
35.54'(R)(R1)
N00°02'00"W 583.42'(M)S00°02'00"E 324.97'(M)S00°02'00"E 325.19'(R)
S7
1
°
3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
2
5
.
5
3
'
(
M
)
N7
1
°
4
3
'
5
5
"
W
1
2
5
.
3
2
'
(
R
)
40' ACCESS & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646 & 171103
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "D"
(SCH.B-II # 12 & 18)
DR
I
V
E
W
A
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
RE
C
.
N
O
.
2
0
0
8
2
5
6
2
7
(S
C
H
.
B
-
I
I
#
1
9
)
DUMPSTER & REFUSE LICENSE AREA
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825628
PRIVATE VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ASSOCIATION EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(PARKING, LANDSCAPING & SNOW STORAGE)
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
APP
R
O
X
.
30'
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
REC
.
N
O
.
2
2
0
6
4
6
(SE
E
S
U
R
V
E
Y
O
R
'
S
N
O
T
E
"
A
"
)
(SC
H
.
B-II
#
1
2
&
1
7
)
ERW
S
D
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
NOT
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
D
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
THE WREN
CONDOMINIUM BUILDING "A"
CONDOMINIUM MAP OF
THE WREN
OWNER: WREN ASSOCIATION
LEONARD L. McCOY, PE & PLS 2432
JAN. 9, 1975 IN BOOK 244, PAGE 32
REC. NO. 140183
AMENDED AND RESTATED TO THE CONDOMINIUM PLAT
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK
OWNER: VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
JULY 12, 2022 - REC. NO. 202211953
CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
KENNETH E. RICHARDS - PE & PLS 2183
SEPT. 5, 1978 - BOOK 274, PAGE 697 - REC. NO. 171103
AMENDED CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
JAMES L. WHEAT, RLS 12488
JUNE 9, 1981 - BOOK 324, PAGE 281 - REC. NO. 220646
CDOT PARCEL 29 REV 3
FAP I70-2(7)183
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1450
RULE AND ORDER
BK. 219 - PG. 441
JAN. 5, 1971
F4
ACCEPTED AS
THE NE CORNER
OF THE WREN
REC. NO. 140183
NO
R
T
H
L
I
N
E
T
R
A
C
T
D
,
V
A
I
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
,
F
I
F
T
H
F
I
L
I
N
G
RE
C
.
N
O
.
1
0
2
5
3
8
10' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 102538 (SCH.B-II #12)
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "B"
S57
°
3
5
'
1
1
"
E
(
R
)
30.00'
40.00'
10.00'
N01°27'02"E 110.50'(M)
N01°28'07"E 110.45'(R)
F5
N7
1
°
3
9
'
4
8
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
8
'
(
R
1
)
CONDOMINIUM PLAT
ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES
OWNER: ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES OWNERS' ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
OCT. 26, 2021 - REC. NO. 202124189
20.00'
HOLY CROSS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200634246
N86°56'58"E(M)
35.53'(M)
N87°04'53"E(R)(R1)
35.53'(R)(R1)
N
4
2
°
0
0
'
3
7
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N
4
2
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
4
6
'
(
R
)
UNABLE TO SET
FALLS ON PART OF BOULDER WALL
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
1/4 CORNER SEC. 8 & SEC. 5
FOUND 2.5" PIPE WITH 3.25"
BRASS BLM CAP STAMPED IN
PART " BUREAU OF LAND
MANAGEMENT - U.S.
CADASTRAL SURVEY - T5S
R80W - 1/4 S5 -S8 - 1978"
BASIS OF BEARING
EDGE OF WATER ON
04.14.2025
CENTER-LINE OF GORE
CREEK AS DEFINED
04.14.2025
50.00'
TRACT A
(GORE CREEK)
VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING
OWNER: TOWN OF VAIL
E. MAX SERAFINI - PE & PLS 2568
NOVEMBER 15, 1965 - REC. NO.
102538
LAND SURVEY PLAT
TRACT A AND TRACT G, VAIL VILLAGE
FIFTH FILING
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
DEPOSITED FEB. 11, 2011 IN BOOK 1
OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S
LAND SURVEY PLAT/RIGHTS-OF-WAY
SURVEYS AT PAGE 781
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
50.00' STREAM SETBACK AS
DEFINED BY THE CENTER-LINE
OF GORE CREEK ON 04.14.2025
N48
°
0
4
'
4
8
"
W
1
9
6
.
6
1
'
(
R
1
)
N01°28'07"E 110.61'(R1)
N
4
2
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
4
'
(
R
1
)
7.5'
0.2'
33.1'
26.3'
12.0'
13
.
3
'
7.6'
23
.
4
'
54.49' (R)
BUILDING "B"
FOOTPRINT
BUILDING "A"
FOOTPRINT
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
N44°
1
5
'
4
1
"
W
(
M
)
154.
4
6
'
(
M
)
N7
3
°
4
2
'
2
9
"
W
(
M
)
27
3
.
1
0
'
(
M
)
S25°
3
4
'
0
0
"
W
(
M
)
81.5
9
'
(
M
)
ORIGINAL 100' R.O.W. FOR U.S. HIGHWAY 6
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS STATE HIGHWAY 78)
FAP 25-A(I)
IN
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
7
0
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
L
Y
R
.
O
.
W
.
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 2 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 2 OF 5
A. THE CENTER-LINE OF THE 30' UTILITY EASEMENT SHOWN ON REC. NO.'S 220646 & 171103 (APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION)
HAS A DEFINED BEARING AND WIDTH BUT DOES NOT HAVE A DEFINED LOCATION. THE LOCATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED
UPON THAT SHOWN ON THE ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY RECORDED NOV. 29, 2005 IN BOOK 1 OF THE EAGLE COUNTY
SURVEYOR'S LAND SURVEY PLATS AT PAGE 571 PREPARED BY MICHAEL J. POST PLS 30116
B. THE 10' UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE EAST LINE OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION (REC. NO.'S 220646 & 171103) BEING
THE SAME AS THE EAST LINE OF TRACT D, VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING ONLY SHOWS ON THE VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING PLAT
PER REC. NO. 102538. FWS DID NOT RECOVER ANY DOCUMENTS INDICATING THAT THIS EASEMENT WAS VACATED PER THE
CONDOMINIUM PLAT OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION. THE VALIDITY OF THIS EASEMENT IS UNKNOWN.
C. ALL EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT (ERWSD) EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON NOTED AS "NOT RECORDED"
WERE PROVIDED BY SAID DISTRICT. FWS WAS UNABLE TO RECOVER AN RECORDED DOCUMENTS FOR THESE EASEMENTS.
THE VALIDITY OF THE EASEMENTS ARE UNKNOWN.
D. THE 40' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT SHOWN ON REC. NO.'S 220646 & 171103 (APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION) HAS A
DEFINED WIDTH BUT DOES NOT HAVE A DEFINED LENGTH. THE LOCATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON THE
APPROXIMATE SCALED LOCATION PER SAID DOCUMENTS WHICH MATCHES THAT SHOWN ON THE ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE
SURVEY RECORDED NOV. 29, 2005 IN BOOK 1 OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S LAND SURVEY PLATS AT PAGE 571
PREPARED BY MICHAEL J. POST PLS 30116
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
S1 - SET 18" NO.5 REBAR WITH 2" ALLOY CAP STAMPED "5.00' W.C. - PLS 38226"
F1 - FOUND NO.5 REBAR WITH 1.5" ALLOY CAP STAMPED IN PART "PLS 27598"
F2 - FOUND NO.4 REBAR WITH 1.25" RED CAP STAMPED IN PART "LS 24318"
F3 - FOUND NO. 4 REBAR - NO CAP
F4 - FOUND NO.5 REBAR - NO CAP
F5 - FOUND NO.5 REBAR WITH 2" ALLOY CAP STAMPED IN PART "PLS 27598"
MONUMENT DESCRIPTIONS
LEGEND
FEET
1 INCH = 20 FEET
4020010
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
4
5
:
1
5
A
M
69
5
TBM-2
F5
W
W
W
D
W
W
W
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598"
UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
F3
E
W
W
C
S71°3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
9
9
.
9
4
'
(
M
)
N71°4
0
'
2
2
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
3
'
(
M
)
N0
0
°
0
2
'
0
0
"
W
5
8
3
.
4
2
'
(
M
)
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
16" MAIN
10
"
M
A
I
N
10
"
M
A
I
N
E
8222'
8224'
8220'
8
2
2
0
'
B-4
ELEV: 8218.06'
SHED
TRASHENCLO
S
U
R
E S71°3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
2
5
.
5
3
'
(
M
)
S71°4
3
'
5
5
"
E
1
2
5
.
3
2
'
(
R
)
DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
DUMPSTER & REFUSE LICENSE AREA
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
CDOT PARCEL 29 REV 3
FAP I70-2(7)183
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1450
RULE AND ORDER
BK. 219 - PG. 441
JAN. 5, 1971
NORTH LIN
E
T
R
A
C
T
D
,
V
A
I
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
,
F
I
F
T
H
F
I
L
I
N
G
REC. NO. 10
2
5
3
8
N71°3
9
'
4
8
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
8
'
(
R
1
)
CONDOMINIUM PLAT
ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES
OWNER: ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES OWNERS' ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
OCT. 26, 2021 - REC. NO. 202124189
20.00'
HOLY CROSS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200634246
1/4 CORNER SEC. 8 & SEC. 5
FOUND 2.5" PIPE WITH 3.25"
BRASS BLM CAP STAMPED IN
PART " BUREAU OF LAND
MANAGEMENT - U.S.
CADASTRAL SURVEY - T5S
R80W - 1/4 S5 -S8 - 1978"
54
.
4
9
'
(
R
)
N
4
4
°
1
5
'
4
1
"
W
(
M
)
1
5
4
.
4
6
'
(
M
)
N73°42'
2
9
"
W
(
M
)
273.10'(
M
)
S2
5
°
3
4
'
0
0
"
W
(
M
)
81.
5
9
'
(
M
)
ORIGINAL 100' R.O.W. FOR U.S. HIGHWAY 6
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS STATE HIGHWAY 78)
FAP 25-A(I)
INTER
S
T
A
T
E
7
0
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
L
Y
R
.
O
.
W
.
CURB &
G
U
T
T
E
R
CURB &
G
U
T
T
E
R
TBM-1
SET MAGSPIKE IN
SIDEWALK JOINT
ELEV:8224.00'
(NAVD88)
PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825628
DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
3.1'
2.8'AREA OF CONCERN
SEE NOTE AA THIS SHEET
AREA OF CONCERN
SEE NOTE BB THIS
SHEET
40' ACCESS & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646 & 171103
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "D" SHEET 2
(SCH.B-II # 12 & 18)
10' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 102538 (SCH.B-II #12)
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "B" SHEET 2
EAST F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
40.9'
TRAVELED WAY
37
.
9
'
TR
A
V
E
L
E
D
W
A
Y
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598" UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
4.6'
CURB INLET
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 3 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 3 OF 5CONTOUR INTERVALS = 1 FOOT
FEET
1 INCH = 10 FEET
201005
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
3
4
:
1
0
A
M
69
6
505
8214.48'
SET SURVEY NAIL
507
8204.20'
SET SURVEY NAIL
TBM-3
E
130840299
8208.64'
TOP OF SLOPE
130840300
8208.50'
TOP OF SLOPE
L
E
E
F1
F1
L
L
SCO
W
EW
S
SCO
130850182
8199.24'
TOP OF SLOPE
DCOG
W
L
L
L
W
E
L
L
F1
N02°51'12"W(M)
35.44'(M)
N02°55'07"W(R)(R1)
35.54'(R)(R1)
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
4' Ø CONC. BARREL
RIM: 8206.07'
8" PVC INV IN EAST: 8187.11'
8" PVC INV IN EAST (NO FLOW): 8193.56'
8" PVC INV IN NE: 8187.11'
8" PVC INV OUT SW: 8187.07'
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
10
"
M
A
I
N
S0
0
°
0
2
'
0
0
"
E
3
2
4
.
9
7
'
(
M
)
S0
0
°
0
2
'
0
0
"
E
3
2
5
.
1
9
'
(
R
)
8215'
8210'
8
2
0
5
'
82
0
5
'
B-3
ELEV: 8214.90'
B-1
ELEV: 8206.78'
POOL
BUILDING "B"
POOL
MECH.
13121505
8214.48'
SET SURVEY NAIL
13121507
8204.20'
SET SURVEY NAIL
40' ACCESS & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646 & 171103
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "D"
(SCH.B-II # 12 & 18)
PRIVATE VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ASSOCIATION EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(PARKING, LANDSCAPING & SNOW STORAGE)
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
APPROX.
30' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "A") SHEET 2
(SCH.B-II #12 & 17)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
CONDOMINIUM MAP OF
THE WREN
OWNER: WREN ASSOCIATION
LEONARD L. McCOY, PE & PLS 2432
JAN. 9, 1975 IN BOOK 244, PAGE 32
REC. NO. 140183
AMENDED AND RESTATED TO THE CONDOMINIUM PLAT
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK
OWNER: VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
JULY 12, 2022 - REC. NO. 202211953
CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
KENNETH E. RICHARDS - PE & PLS 2183
SEPT. 5, 1978 - BOOK 274, PAGE 697 - REC. NO. 171103
AMENDED CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
JAMES L. WHEAT, RLS 12488
JUNE 9, 1981 - BOOK 324, PAGE 281 - REC. NO. 220646
10' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 102538 (SCH.B-II #12)
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "B" SHEET 2
S5
7
°
3
5
'
1
1
"
E
(
R
)
40
.
0
0
'
10.00'
N0
1
°
2
7
'
0
2
"
E
1
1
0
.
5
0
'
(
M
)
N0
1
°
2
8
'
0
7
"
E
1
1
0
.
4
5
'
(
R
)
N86°56'58"E(M)
35.53'(M)
N87°04'53"E(R)(R1)
35.53'(R)(R1)
N42
°
0
0
'
3
7
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N42
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
4
6
'
(
R
)
BA
S
I
S
O
F
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
N0
1
°
2
8
'
0
7
"
E
1
1
0
.
6
1
'
(
R
1
)
N42
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
4
'
(
R
1
)
7.
6
'
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
"
B
"
FO
O
T
P
R
I
N
T
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
8" P
V
C
DEC
K
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 4 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 4 OF 5FEET
1:120.0005
201005
CONTOUR INTERVALS = 1 FOOT
MATCH-LINE SHEET 5
MATCH-LINE SHEET 3
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
4
2
:
2
1
A
M
69
7
508
8205.56'
SET SURVEY NAIL
F1
BM 510
8199.69'
SET NAIL
512
8172.42'
SET SURVEY NAIL
BM 591
8198.73'
SET NAIL
S
W
SS
130860430
8202.87'
SPOT CONCRETE
130860431
8203.28'
SPOT CONCRETE
W
CB
F3
CBCB
E
24" CPP INVERT
SOUTH: 8182.25'
N
4
8
°
0
2
'
4
8
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
M
)
N79°47'53"
W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N79°46'00"W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
R
)
N
4
7
°
5
5
'
0
7
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
R
)
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
TTT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
10"
M
A
I
N
E
82
0
5
'
82
0
5
'
820
0
'
8195'
8190'8185'
818
0
'
8
1
7
5
'
81
7
5
'
81
8
0
'
81
8
5
'
8
1
9
0
'
8200'
819
5
'
8190'
8185'
818
0
'
B-2
ELEV: 8205.66'
BUILDING "B"
HIGH POINT: 8239.90'
BUILDING "A"HIGH POINT:8236.90'
CON
C
R
E
T
E
RAM
P
13121508
8205.56'
SET SURVEY NAIL
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
30
.
0
0
'
UNABLE TO SET
FALLS ON PART OF BOULDER WALL
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
EDGE OF WATER ON
04.14.2025
CENTER-LINE OF GORE
CREEK AS DEFINED
04.14.2025
50
.
0
0
'
TRACT A
(GORE CREEK)
VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING
OWNER: TOWN OF VAIL
E. MAX SERAFINI - PE & PLS 2568
NOVEMBER 15, 1965 - REC. NO.
102538
LAND SURVEY PLAT
TRACT A AND TRACT G, VAIL VILLAGE
FIFTH FILING
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
DEPOSITED FEB. 11, 2011 IN BOOK 1
OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S
LAND SURVEY PLAT/RIGHTS-OF-WAY
SURVEYS AT PAGE 781
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
50.00' STREAM SETBACK AS
DEFINED BY THE CENTER-LINE
OF GORE CREEK ON 04.14.2025
7.
5
'
0.
2
'
33
.
1
'
26
.
3
'
12
.
0
'
13.3'
23.4'
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
"
B
"
FO
O
T
P
R
I
N
T
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
"
A
"
FO
O
T
P
R
I
N
T
8" P
V
C
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
RIM: 8206.95'
8" PVC INV IN EAST: 8197.66'
8" PVC INV OUT WNW: 8197.63'
CONC. STAIRS
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
4' Ø CONC. BARREL
RIM: 8200.04'
8" PVC INV IN NE: 8186.38'
8" PVC INV OUT W:8186.34'
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 5 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 5 OF 5
CONTOUR INTERVALS = 1 FOOT
MATCH-LINE SHEET 4
FEET
1 INCH = 10 FEET
201005
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
3
2
:
1
3
A
M
69
8
Town Council Meeting Minutes of November 4, 2025. Page 1
Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, November 4, 2025
3:00 P.M.
Vail Town Council Chambers
The meeting of the Vail Town Council was called to order at approximately 3:00 P.M. by Mayor
Coggin.
Members present: Travis Coggin, Mayor
Barry Davis, Mayor Pro Tem
Pete Seibert
Jonathan Staufer
Dave Chapin
Reid Phillips
Samantha Biszantz
Staff members present: Russell Forrest, Town Manager
Kathleen Halloran, Deputy Town Manager
Stephanie Kauffman (Bibbens), Town Clerk
Matt Mire, Town Attorney
1. Call to Order
2. Interviews for Boards and Commissions
Interviews for the Planning and Environmental Commission began at time stamp 0:00:15 on the
High Five video.
2.1 Interviews for the Planning and Environmental Commission
Presenter(s): Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk
Interview candidates that are interested in serving on the PEC.
Background: One partial vacancy exists on the Planning and Environmental Commission and
four applicants have submitted applications. The term of the new appointments will begin on
November 10, 2025 and expires on March 31, 2027 (partial term). Duties and functions of the
PEC include review and determination of requests for variances and conditional use permits,
and recommendations to Town Council on special development districts, subdivisions, re-
zonings, various Town of Vail proposed plans and other community matters per the Town
Charter and ordinances.
3. Presentation/Discussion
The presentation for the Energy Performance Contract Budget Discussion began at time stamp
0:10:36 on the High Five video.
699
Town Council Meeting Minutes of November 4, 2025. Page 2
3.1 Energy Performance Contract Budget Discussion
Presenter(s): Kristen Bertuglia, Director of Environmental Sustainability, Cameron Millard, Clean
Energy Specialist, Stephan Rank, Senior Project Engineer with McKinstry
Listen to presentation and provide feedback.
Background: Updated project information to share with Town Council regarding the Energy
Performance Contract.
Council agreed to continue to move forward with the Energy Performance Contract.
4. DRB/PEC Update
DRB/PEC update began at time stamp 0:44:50 on the High Five video.
5. Information Update
Information update began at time stamp 0:45:43 on the High Five video.
5.1 October 2025 Revenue Update
5.2 3rd Quarter Investment Report
6. Matters from Mayor, Council, Town Manager and Committee Reports
Matters began at time stamp 0:46:42 on the High Five video.
6.1 Mayor, Council Members, and Committee Reports
6.2 Town Manager Report
6.3 Council Matters and Status Update
7. Executive Session
Executive Session began at time stamp 0:57:03 on the High Five video.
Executive Session pursuant to:
C.R.S. § 24-6-402(4)(b) to hold a conference with the Town Attorney, to receive legal advice on
specific legal questions; and C.R.S. § 24-6-402(4)(e) to determine positions relative to matters
that may be subject to negotiations, develop a strategy for negotiations and instruct negotiators
on the topic of an Operating Agreement between the Town of Vail and Vail Park and Recreation
District for Dobson Arena; and C.R.S. § 24-6-402(4)(b) to hold a conference with the Town
Attorney, to receive legal advice on specific legal questions regarding:1. Short Term Rental Fire
Inspection/Renewal Issues; and
700
Town Council Meeting Minutes of November 4, 2025. Page 3
2. Ordinance No. 13, Series of 2025, An Emergency Ordinance Temporarily Suspending the
Acceptance and Processing of Applications, the Scheduling of Public Hearings and the
Issuance of Building Permits Related to the Conversion of Eating and Drinking Establishments
to Any Other Permitted or Conditional Use in the SBR, SBR-2, CC-1, CC-2, LMU-1, LMU-2, and
PA Zone Districts.
8. Any action as a result of Executive Session
9. Consent Agenda
Consent Agenda began at time stamp 0:58:18 on the High Five video.
9.1 October 7, 2025 TC Meeting Minutes
9.2 October 21, 2025 TC Meeting Minutes
9.3 Resolution No. 53, Series of 2025, A Resolution of the Vail Town Council Granting
Certain Easements to the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (the "ERWSD")
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution 53, Series of 2025.
Background: The Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (ERWSD) is completing
infrastructure upgrades that require use of Town property. In order to complete these projects
ERWSD needs to obtain three easements from the Town of Vail.
9.4 Resolution No. 54, Series of 2025, A Resolution of the Vail Town Council Approving a
Lease Agreement with Long Pourr for a Limited Food Establishment in the Vail
Transportation Center
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 54, Series of 2025.
Background: The Town wishes to grant a lease agreement with Long Pourr for the operation of
a limited food establishment in the Vail Transportation Center.
Staufer made a motion to approve Consent Agenda as presented; Seibert seconded motion
passed (7-0).
10. Appointments for Boards and Commissions
Appointments for Boards and Commissions began at time stamp 0:58:36 on the High Five
video.
10.1 Planning and Environmental Commission
Davis made a motion to appoint Margaret Hanlon Brown to service on the Planning and
Environmental Commission for a partial term, ending March 31, 2027; Staufer seconded motion
passes (7-0).
701
Town Council Meeting Minutes of November 4, 2025. Page 4
11. Action Items
Discussion for Contract Award to Zip Car for the Vail Car Share Program began at time stamp
0:59:25 on the High Five Media video.
11.1 Contract Award to Zip Car for Vail Car Share Program
Presenter(s): Beth Markham, Environmental Sustainability Manager
Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town
Attorney, with Zip Car for the Vail Car Share program to begin in 2026, in an amount not to
exceed $147,000.
Background: The purpose of this item is to request the Vail Town Council to authorize a contract
beginning in 2026 for the Vail Car Share program with Zip Car.
Staufer made a motion to approve; Chapin seconded motion passed (7-0).
Discussion for the Permission to Proceed with Loading and Delivery Changes for Grand Hyatt
began at timestamp 1:04:57on the High Five Media video.
11.2 Permission to Proceed with Loading and Delivery Changes for Grand Hyatt
Presenter(s): Greg Roy, Planning Manager
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny permission to proceed.
Background: The owner of the 1300 Westhaven Dr, Vail Hotel Partners, LLC Hotelave,
represented by Ruther Associates, LLC located at 1300 Westhaven Drive, is requesting
permission to construct a loading and delivery berth in the Town of Vail right-of-way.
Chapin made a motion to approve; Phillips seconded motion passed (7-0).
Discussion for Ordinance No. 24, Series of 2025 began at timestamp 1:08:14 on the High Five
Media video.
11.3 Ordinance No. 24, Series of 2025, First Reading, Annual Appropriation Ordinance
Adopting a Budget and Financial Plan and Making Appropriations to Pay the Costs,
Expenses, and Liabilities of the Town of Vail, Colorado, for its Fiscal Year January 1,
2026 through December 31, 2026
Presenter(s): Jake Shipe, Budget Manager
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 24, Series of 2025.
Background: On October 21st, staff presented a draft of the Town Manager’s budget for
Council’s Review. Staff has made adjustments and provided additional information in response
702
Town Council Meeting Minutes of November 4, 2025. Page 5
to Council's comments and questions and is seeking approval of the Budget Ordinance on first
reading.
Information provided in the attached memo includes the proposed revenue and expenditures for
all town funds, a summary of changes in personnel, funding recommendations for Council
contributions, and a five-year capital plan.
Davis made a motion to approve; Chapin seconded motion passed (7-0).
Discussion for Ordinance No. 26, Series of 2025 began at timestamp 1:29:11 on the High Five
Media video.
11.4 Ordinance No. 26, Series of 2025, First Reading, An Ordinance Amending Section 7-
8-4 of the Vail Town Code Regarding Designated Areas for the Operation of Golf Cars
and Low Speed Electric Vehicles
Presenter(s): Chief Ryan Kenney, Vail Police Department
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 26, Series of 2025 upon first
reading.
Background: The proposed ordinance clarifies the definitions of “Golf Car” and “Low-Speed
Electric Vehicle” and establishes designated areas where these vehicles may be operated
within the Town of Vail.
Chapin made a motion to approve; Phillips seconded motion passed (7-0).
12. Public Hearings
Discussion for Ordinance No. 21, Series of 2025 began at time stamp 1:35:07 on the High Five
video.
12.1 Ordinance No. 21, Series of 2025, Second Reading, An Ordinance Amending Chapter
13 of Title 7 of the Vail Town Code Regarding Designated Loading and Delivery Areas
Presenter(s): Chief Ryan Kenney, Vail Police Department
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 21, Series of 2025 upon second
reading.
Background: Recent loading and delivery violations have been occurring with greater frequency
in the outlying areas of the Village Core. As enforcement strengthens within the Village,
delivery companies are getting creative with locations they can deliver from.
Public comment was called. There was none.
Chapin made a motion to approve; Staufer seconded motion passed (7-0).
703
Town Council Meeting Minutes of November 4, 2025. Page 6
Discussion for Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2025 began at time stamp 1:36:45 on the High Five
video.
12.2 Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2025, Second Reading, An Ordinance to Amending
Chapter 3 of Title 6 of the Vail Town Code, Regarding Unlawfully Disobeying Peace
Officers
Presenter(s): Chief Ryan Kenney, Vail Police Department
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2025 upon second
reading.
Background: The Vail Police Department is requesting Town Council approve an amendment to
Vail Town Code 6-3A-5, which is based on recent case law that applies to the lawful requests of
a person to identify themselves to peace officers.
Public comment was called at time stamp 1:37:33 on the High Five video.
Public comment ended at time stamp 1:38:29 on the High Five video.
Phillips made a m0tion to approve; Staufer seconded motion passed (7-0).
Discussion for Ordinance No. 23, Series of 2025 began at time stamp 1:38:56 on the High Five
video.
12.3 Ordinance No. 23, Series of 2025, Second Reading, An Ordinance Authorizing the
Sale of Certain Real Property Known as Pitkin Creek Park Condominium Unit 3B at a
Proposed Sales Price of $500,000.00
Presenter(s): Jason Dietz, Housing Director
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 23, Series of 2025 upon second
reading.
Background: The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a summary of the background
seeking the approval of the proposed Ordinance No. 23, Series of 2025 which authorizes the
sale of certain real property owned by the Town of Vail.
Public comment was called. There was none.
Staufer made a motion to approve; Davis seconded motion passed (7-0).
Discussion for Ordinance No. 29, Series of 2025 began at time stamp 1:40:24 on the High Five
video.
13.4 Ordinance No. 29, Series of 2025, Second Reading, An Ordinance Rezoning 16 Vail
Road, Vail Village Filing 1, Lots M & O, also known as Vail Village Inn Phase IV, from the
Public Accommodation (PA) Zone District to the Vail Village Inn (VV) Zone District
704
Town Council Meeting Minutes of November 4, 2025. Page 7
Presenter(s): Heather Knight, Planner II
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 29, Series of 2025 upon second
reading.
Background: The applicant, Ferruco Vail Ventures LLC, is proposing a Zone District Boundary
amendment pursuant to 12-3-7 Amendment, Vail Town Code to rezone 16 Vail Road, Vail
Village Filing 1, Lots M & O, also known as Vail Village Inn Phase IV, from the Public
Accommodation (PA) Zone District to the Vaill Village Inn (VVI) Zone District.
Public comment was called. There was none.
Staufer made a motion to approve; Seibert seconded motion passed (7-0).
13. Public Participation
Public participation began at time stamp 1:45:36 of the High Five video.
Tim McMahon, Town of Avon resident, apologized to anyone whom he may have offended
during the campaign season.
14. Action Items
Discussion for Ordinance No. 27, Series of 2027 began at time stamp 1:48:00 on the High Five
video.
14.5 Ordinance No. 27, Series of 2025, First Reading, An Ordinance Amending Chapter 7
of Title 12 of the Vail Town Code Regarding the Conversion of Eating and Drinking
Establishments
Presenter(s): Matt Gennett, Director of Community Development
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 27, Series of 2025 upon first
reading.
Background: The applicant, the Town of Vail, is requesting the Town Council approve
Ordinance No. 27, Series of 2025, An Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 of Title 12 of the Vail
Town Code Regarding the Conversion of Eating and Drinking Establishments, on First reading.
Chapin made a motion to approve; Phillips seconded motion passed (5-2 Davis and Biszantz
opposed).
Discussion for Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2025 at time stamp 1:59:48 on the High Five video.
14.6 Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2025, First Reading, An Ordinance Repealing Ordinance
No. 13, Series of 2025, to Lift the Temporary Suspension on the Acceptance and
Processing of Applications, the Scheduling of Public Hearings and the Issuance of
Building Permits related to the Conversion of Eating and Drinking Establishments to any
705
Town Council Meeting Minutes of November 4, 2025. Page 8
other Permitted or Conditional Use in the SBR, SBR-2, CC-1, LMU-1, LMU-2 and PA Zone
Districts
Presenter(s): Matt Gennet, Community Development Director
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2025 upon first
reading.
Background: On June 3, 2025, the Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 13, Series 2025,
which imposed a temporary suspension on the acceptance and processing of applications and
the scheduling of public hearings related to the conversion of eating and drinking
establishments to any other permitted or conditional use in the zone districts cited herein to
allow the Town Council to consider amendments to the Vail Town Code in furtherance of the
Master Plans and related goals of supporting nightlife and maintaining vibrancy in the Town.
Staufer made a motion to approve; Davis seconded motion passed (7-0).
15. Public Hearings
Discussion for Ordinance No.52. Series of 2025 began at 2:02:16 on the High Five video.
15.5 Resolution No. 52, Series of 2025 Vail Village Master Plan Amendment
Presenter(s): Greg Roy, Planning Manager
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Resolution No. 52, Series of 2025.
Background: The applicant, Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC represented by Ruther
Associates LLC, is requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section
3-2-6A, Function, Vail Town Code, to amend Conceptual Building Height Plan of the Vail Village
Master Plan.
The Planning and Environmental Commission, with a unanimous vote of 5-0 (Tucker and
Lintner absent) forwarded a recommendation of denial to the Vail Town Council, to amend
Conceptual Building Height Plan of the Vail Village Master Plan.
Public comment was called at time stamp 2:27:06 on the High Five video.
Public comment ended at time stamp 2:40:22 on the High Five video.
Phillips made a motion to deny Resolution No. 52, Series of 2025 based on the
recommendation of the Planning and Environmental Commission:
1. That the master plan amendment is not consistent with the applicable elements of
the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and is
compatible with the development objectives of the town; and
2. That the master plan amendment does not further the general and specific
706
Town Council Meeting Minutes of November 4, 2025. Page 9
purposes of the zoning regulations; and
3. That the master plan amendment does not promote the health, safety, morals, and
general welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development
of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its
established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality." ;
Staufer seconded motion for denial passed (6-1 Coggin in favor).
Discussion for Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025 began at time stamp 2:58:31 on the High Five
video.
15.6 Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025, First Reading, An Ordinance Approving the
Establishment of a New Special Development District No. 44, Lunar Park, and Specifically
to Approve the Development of a Multi-Family Development. Located at 442 South
Frontage Road East
Presenter(s): Greg Roy, Planning Manager
Approve, approve with amendments, or deny Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025 upon first
reading.
Background: The applicant, Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC, represented by Ruther
Associates is requesting approval for the establishment of a new Special Development District,
pursuant to Section 12-9(A), Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code, to allow for the
development of a multi-family project, located at 442 South Frontage Road East/ Vail Village
Filing 5, Tract D.
Public comment was called at time stamp 4:17:54 of the High Five video.
Public comment ended at time stamp 4:42:03 on the High Five video.
Phillips made a motion to table Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2025 and to continue the public
hearing until Tuesday, December 2, 2025; Davis seconded motion passed (7-0).
There being no further business to come before the council, Davis made a motion to
adjourn the meeting; Staufer seconded; meeting adjourned at 9:01pm.
Respectfully Submitted,
Attest: __________________________________
, Mayor
______________________________
Stephanie Kauffman, Town Clerk
707
SO
U
T
H
F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
S
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25AS-01
ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
20
'
-
0
"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
NORTH / SITE PARKING
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK
SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE
PARKING
GARAGE
THE WREN
AT VAIL
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES
10
'
10
'
22
'
27
'
21
'
21
'
20'
20'
20'
41'
N
0 8'16'32'
SCALE - 1/16" = 1'-0"
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES
SOUTH /
APOLLO
PARK
Revised
01.06.26
70
8
S
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A002
EXISTING VS PROPOSED SETBACK DIAGRAM
20
'
-
0
"
PROPOSED BUILDING
FOOTPRINT
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK
SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE
PARKING
GARAGE
THE WREN
AT VAIL
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES
10
'
10
'
22
'
27
'
21
'
21
'
21'
20'
41'
N
0 8'16'32'
SCALE - 1/16" = 1'-0"
20'
EXISTING APOLLO PARK
FOOTPRINT
EXISTING BUILDING 2'
FROM PROPERTY LINE
1
2
'
7'-7
"
6'
-
9
"
20'-
4
"
15
'
3
3
'
2
6
'
SETBACK
SETBACK
Revised
01.06.26
70
9
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
33
34
35
36
37
40C
21 22 23 24 25 282627 29 30
45
8
7
11
9
3 2
1
10
STAIR 2
20 31C 32C
UP
12C
RAMP
39
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
38
BIKE
STOR.
MECH.
316 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
613
14
15
16
17
1918MECH.
LOW
HEIGHT
STORAGE
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A003
PARKING
LEVEL P2
BUILDING AREA IN SETBACK
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
AREA 1 - 380 S.F.
AREA 2 - 891 S.F.
71
0
S
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25
SITE ACCESS DIAGRAM
A004
N
0 8'16'32'
SCALE - 1/16" = 1'-0"
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES
SOUTH /
APOLLO
PARK
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
NORTH / SITE PARKING
PROPERTY LINE
ALTUS
VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES
VA
I
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
FO
R
D
P
A
R
K
THE WREN
AT VAIL
PARKING
GARAGE
BUILDING ACCESS
VEHICLE ACCESS
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
FIRE ACCESS
SITE ACCESS DIAGRAM
LUNAR
RESIDE
SOU
LUNAR
RESIDEN
SOUT
VA
I
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
FO
R
D
P
A
R
K
Revised
01.06.26
71
1
DN
DN
DN
L.V.N.
UNIT E
STAIR
L.V.N.
UNIT G
(EHU)
1,048 N.S.F.
UPDN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV2,362 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
LOCK-OFF
2 BR / 1.5 BA
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LAUND BATH
BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
2,326 N.S.F.L.V.N.
UNIT A3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER
BATH
FOYER
FOYER
3 BR / 3.5 BA
DEN
2,513 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
L.V.N.
UNIT C
2,341 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5
BA + DEN
LAUND
1,275 N.S.F.
2,267 N.S.F.
2 BR / 2 BA
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A010
SITE COVERAGE PLAN
ABOVE GROUND
LUNAR VAIL NORTH
LUNAR VAIL
SOUTH /
APOLLO
PARK
4' MIN. AREA BUFFER
GARAGE BELOW
Revised
01.06.26
71
2
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
33
34
35
36
37
40C
21 22 23 24 25 282627 29 30
45
8
7
11
9
3 2
1
10
STAIR 2
20 31C 32C
UP
12C
RAMP
39
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
38
BIKE
STOR.
MECH.
316 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
613
14
15
16
17
1918MECH.
LOW
HEIGHT
STORAGE
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 09.22.25A011
SITE COVERAGE PLAN
BELOW GROUND
PARKING GARAGE
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
/ APOLLO PARK
4' AREA BUFFER
Revised
01.06.26
71
3
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A012
SITE COVERAGE PLAN
ROOF PLAN
NO ROOF OVERHANG SHALL
EXCEED 4'-0", TYPICAL UNLESS
NOTED OTHERWISE
ALL GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS
SHALL BE INTERNAL TO ROOF,
TYPICAL
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"
8'
-
9
"
4'8"
4'-6"
4'10"
5'4"
2'-6"
4'6"
9'10"
5'-10"
4'-4"
3'-10"
3'-4"
3'
3'
-
2
"
2'
-
4
"
1'-9
"
2'-3
"
2'
3'
4'
7'
-
3
"
1'
2'
2'
3'
4'
1'
1'
2'
1'
1'
4'
2
'
4'
6
"
3'
4'4'
3'1'
3'6"
4'
3'4
"
4'
4'4'
3'
2'
-
3
"
7'
2'
Revised
01.06.26
71
4
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25
SITE LIGHTING
FIXTURES 14' POLE LIGHT LOCATED ALONG DRIVEWAYS AND
FRONTAGE ROAD
WALL SCONCE 1
LOCATED AT BUILDING ENTRANCES
1
ALL FIXTURES SELECTED ARE "DARK SKY CERTIFIED" BY MANUFACTURER
WALL SCONCE 2
LOCATED AT BALCONIES
2 RECESSED FIXTURE
LOCATED AT DECKS AND GROUND LEVEL ENTRIES
PATH LIGHT FIXTURE
SEE LANDSCAPE FOR LOCATIONS
A013
Revised
01.06.26
71
5
S
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A104
SITE LIGHTING PLAN
DRIVEWAY LIGHTING
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
1
1
1
RECESSED
FIXTURES
ABOVE
1
1
1
1
SEE ENLARGED PLAN
FOR RESIDENTIAL
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
ABOVE GRADE
SE
E
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
DR
A
W
I
N
G
S
F
O
R
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
ALL FIXTURES
SELECTED ARE "DARK
SKY CERTIFIED" BY
MANUFACTURER
SEE ENLARGED PLAN
FOR RESIDENTIAL
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
ABOVE GRADE
SEE ENLARGED PLAN
FOR RESIDENTIAL
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
ABOVE GRADE
RECESSED
FIXTURES
ABOVE
1
1
1
1
1
Revised
01.06.26
71
6
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A104
SITE LIGHTING
LUNAR VAIL NORTH
71
7
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A104
SITE LIGHTING
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
RECESSED
FIXTURES ABOVE
CENTERED ON
DOOR, TYP.
2
2
ALL FIXTURES
SELECTED ARE "DARK
SKY CERTIFIED" BY
MANUFACTURER
2
2
2
2
Revised
01.06.26
71
8
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
8200'
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A104
SITE LIGHTING
APOLLO PARK
ALL FIXTURES
SELECTED ARE "DARK
SKY CERTIFIED" BY
MANUFACTURER
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Revised
01.06.26
71
9
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UPUP
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
STAIR 1
VEST.
ELEV.
S
UNEXCAVATED
22 24 25
MECH.
23
+0'-0"-3'-0"
27 29 30 31 32
43C
26
UP
1
2
3
9
10
8
6
45
12
7
14C
15C
STAIR 2
16C
11
13
33 34 35C28
SPEED RAMP
36C
42
+0'-0"
UP
41 40 39 38 37
MECH.
17
18
19
MECH.
20
21
STOR.
STOR.
STOR.
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A021
PARKING
LEVEL P3
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R1
AREA PLAN
PARKING LEVEL P3
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R1
A.P. UNIT J
2 BD / 2 BA
829 GRFA
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
.
5
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
.
5
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
A
2
B
D
/
2
B
A
1
0
6
6
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
A
2
2
B
D
/
2
B
A
1
0
5
0
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
H
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
5
7
1
G
R
F
A
A.P. UNIT H
1 BD / 1 BA
572 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1065 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1066 GRFA
A.P. UNIT K
2 BD / 2 BA
1051 GRFA
A.P. UNIT G
1 BD / 1.5 BA
650 GRFA
Revised
01.06.26
72
0
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
33
34
35
36
37
40C
21 22 23 24 25 282627 29 30
45
8
7
11
9
3 2
1
10
STAIR 2
20 31C 32C
UP
12C
RAMP
39
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
38
BIKE
STOR.
MECH.
316 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
613
14
15
16
17
1918MECH.
LOW
HEIGHT
STORAGE
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
POWDER
POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
STAIR 6
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
AP UNIT
EVTR
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
UTILITYMASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
POWDER
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A022
PARKING
LEVEL P2
AREA PLAN
PARKING LEVEL P2
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R2
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R2
A.P. UNIT J
2 BD / 2 BA
829 GRFA
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
.
5
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
.
5
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
A
2
B
D
/
2
B
A
1
0
6
6
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
A
2
2
B
D
/
2
B
A
1
0
5
0
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
H
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
5
7
1
G
R
F
A
A.P. UNIT H
1 BD / 1 BA
572 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1065 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1066 GRFA
A.P. UNIT K
2 BD / 2 BA
1066 GRFA
A.P. UNIT G
1 BD / 1.5 BA
650 GRFA
Revised
01.06.26
72
1
STAIR 1
TRASH
HOLDING
10
9
4
3 2
1
VEST.
ELEV.
S
19C18C17
ARRIVALS
+0'
GENERATOR
6
5
8
7
16
STAIR 2
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
CON
T
R
O
L
A
R
M
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
EVTR
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
STAIR 4
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
BATH
BATH
BATH
POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
STAIR 6
EVTR
EVTR
TBD
TBD
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM MASTER
BEDROOM CLOS/
LAUND
MASTER
BATH BEDROOM
BATH
STORAGE
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
POWDER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
POWDER SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR 1
TRASH
HOLDING ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY10
9
4
3 2
1
VEST.
ELEV.
S MECH.
UP
RA
M
P
29
30
31
32
33
11
19C 21 22 23 24 27252618C17
ARRIVALS
28
+0'-0"
UP
13C
GENERATOR
6
5
8
7
16 20
15
TRASH
LIFT
STAIR 2
EV EV EV
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
14CON
T
R
O
L
A
R
M
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
12
EV EV EV
MECH.
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A023
PARKING
LEVEL P1
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R3
AREA PLAN
PARKING LEVEL P1
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R3
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO
A.P. UNIT J
2 BD / 2 BA
829 GRFA
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
.
5
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
G
1
B
D
/
1
.
5
B
A
6
4
9
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
A
2
B
D
/
2
B
A
1
0
6
6
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
A
2
2
B
D
/
2
B
A
1
0
5
0
G
R
F
A
A
.
P
.
U
N
I
T
H
1
B
D
/
1
B
A
5
7
1
G
R
F
A
A.P. UNIT H
1 BD / 1 BA
572 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1065 GRFA
A.P. UNIT A
2 BD / 2 BA
1066 GRFA
A.P. UNIT K
2 BD / 2 BA
1086 GRFA
A.P. UNIT G
1 BD / 1.5 BA
650 GRFA
Revised
01.06.26
72
2
STAIR 3
EHU
LOBBY
R
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
BUILDING
LOBBY
STAIR 1
ELEV.
REGISTRATION
OFFICE
MAIL
DELIVERY
POOL
LOBBY
POOL
MECH.
DN
DN
UP
UP
STAIR
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
T.
STOR.
STOR.
MECH.
TRASH
ROOM
EHU
UNIT
BEDROOM
BATH
T.
EHU
UNIT
EHU
UNIT EHU
UNIT
EHU
UNIT
BEDROOM
BATH
EHU
UNIT
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
EVTR
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
CLOSET
WC
BATH #1
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
#1
WC
BATH
MASTER
BATH
WC
CLOSET
MASTER
BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
BATH
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
CLOSET
LAUNDRY
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
DINING
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
STAIR 6
EVTRFOYER
FOYER
FOYER
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
WC
WC
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
DINING
CLOSET
CLOSET
CLOSET
BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
KITCHEN
DINING
DINING
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A024
LEVEL R0LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R4
AREA PLAN
PARKING LEVEL P0
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R4
L.V.S. UNIT F
3 BD / 3 BA
2,165 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
2 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT E
3 BD / 3 BA
2,134 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT D
3 BD / 3 BA
1,924 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT C
3 BD / 3 BA
2,114 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT B
3 BD / 3 BA
1,820 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT A
3 BD / 3 BA
1,471 GRFA
Revised
01.06.26
72
3
DN
DN
DN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
BATH
MASTER
BATH
WC
CLOSET
MASTER
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR 6
EVTR
STAIR 4
STAIR 5
EVTR
FOYER
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
FOYER
FOYER
EVTR
WC
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
DINING
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
CLOSET
CLOSET
CLOSET
WC
WC
WC
DINING
DINING
DINING
L.V.N.
UNIT E
STAIR
L.V.N.
UNIT G
(EHU)
1,048 N.S.F.
UPDN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV2,362 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
LOCK-OFF
2 BR / 1.5 BA
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LAUND BATH
BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
2,326 N.S.F.L.V.N.
UNIT A3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER
BATH
FOYER
FOYER
3 BR / 3.5 BA
DEN
2,513 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5 BA
+ DEN
L.V.N.
UNIT C
2,341 N.S.F.
3 BR / 3.5
BA + DEN
LAUND
1,275 N.S.F.
2,267 N.S.F.
2 BR / 2 BA
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A025
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R5
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R1
AREA PLAN
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R1
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R5
L.V.N. UNIT A
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,328 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT B
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,485 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT C
3 BD / 3 BA + DEN
2,412 GRFA UNIT C
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT D
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,363 GRFA
UNIT D
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT E
2 BD / 2.5 BA
1,646 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT G
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT F
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT F
3 BD / 3 BA
2,165 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT E
3 BD / 3 BA
2,134 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT D
3 BD / 3 BA
1,924 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT C
3 BD / 3 BA
2,114 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT B
3 BD / 3 BA
1,820 GRFA
L.V.S. UNIT A
3 BD / 3 BA
1,471 GRFA
Revised
01.06.26
72
4
L.V.N.
UNIT E
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
L.V.N.
UNIT G
(EHU)
STAIR
UPDN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
LAUND BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER FOYER
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT C
LAUND
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATHBATH
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT A
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A026
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R2
AREA PLAN
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R2
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH / APOLLO PARK
ROOF PLAN
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
/APOLLO PARK ROOF PLAN
L.V.N. UNIT A
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,328 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT B
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,485 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT C
3 BD / 3 BA + DEN
2,412 GRFA UNIT C
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT D
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,363 GRFA
UNIT D
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT E
2 BD / 2.5 BA
1,646 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT G
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT F
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA
Revised
01.06.26
72
5
STAIR
UPDN
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER FOYERL.V.N.
UNIT E
L.V.N.
UNIT C
LAUND
BATH
BEDROOM
STAIR
UP
DN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
ELEVELEV
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
LAUND BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
FOYER
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT G
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATHBATH
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT A
BEDROOM
BATH
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A027
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R3
AREA PLAN
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R3
L.V.N. UNIT A
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,328 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT B
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,485 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT C
3 BD / 3 BA + DEN
2,412 GRFA UNIT C
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT D
3 BD / 3.5 BA + DEN
2,363 GRFA
UNIT D
LOCK
OFF
UNIT
L.V.N. UNIT E
2 BD / 2.5 BA
1,522 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT G
1 BD / 1 BA
757 GRFA
E.H.U. UNIT F
1 BD / 1 BA
0 GRFA GR
E
E
N
R
O
O
F
AR
E
A
GR
E
E
N
R
O
O
F
AR
E
A
Revised
01.06.26
72
6
DN
ELEVELEV
STAIR
DN
STAIR
DEN
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATHBATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT J
BEDROOM
L.V.N.
UNIT K
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BATH
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A028
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R4
AREA PLAN
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R4
GR
E
E
N
R
O
O
F
AR
E
A
L.V.N. UNIT J
4 BD / 5.5 BA
4,208 GRFA
L.V.N. UNIT K
4 BD / 3.5 BA
3,747 GRFA
GR
E
E
N
R
O
O
F
AR
E
A
ROOF
AMENITY
AREA
Revised
01.06.26
72
7
Revised
01.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A031
AERIAL VIEW LOOKING SOUTHWEST AERIAL VIEW LOOKING NORTH
AERIAL VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEASTPOOL PLAZA LOOKING WEST
728
Revised
01.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A032
VIEW FROM MOUNTAIN VIEW POOL DECK
VIEW FROM THE WREN LOWER PARKING DECK
POOL PLAZA LOOKING EAST
VIEW FROM MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES
72
9
Revised
01.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A033
VIEW FROM SOUTHVIEW FROM NORTHEAST
VIEW FROM NORTHWEST VIEW SOUTHEAST TOWARDS CREEK FROM APOLLO SECOND FLOOR
730
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
R0-LVN GROUND FLOOR
8222' -0"
5'-
0
"
10
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
0
"
13
'
-
6
"
9'-
0
"
14
'
-
0
"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
LVN EAVE
8273' -6"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR*
8191' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLR (P1)
8209' -0"
PLAZA
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 0
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' -6"
EAST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8218' -0"
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES NORTH
56
'
-
6
"
18
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
6
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
56
'
-
6
"
PARKING LEVEL P1
PARKING LEVEL P2
PARKING LEVEL P3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES SOUTH &
APOLLO PARK
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 5
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
SE
T
B
A
C
K
SE
T
B
A
C
K
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
70'-0" ABOVE EXISTING
GRADE
50'-0" ABOVE EXISTING
GRADE
ROOF TOP AMENITIES
PATH
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
E
D
G
E
O
F
W
A
T
E
R
(+/-) 99'-0 5/8" (VARIES)COPING 8265.83'
P2 -PARKING*
8199' -6"
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
R0-LVN GROUND FLOOR
8222' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR (P3)
8191' -0"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
LVN EAVE
8273' -6"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8209' -0"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -6"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
5'-
0
"
10
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
0
"
13
'
-
6
"
9'-
0
"
14
'
-
0
"
18
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
6
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
PLAZA
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES SOUTH &
APOLLO PARK
56
'
-
6
"
56
'
-
6
"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL R0
PARKING LEVEL P1
PARKING LEVEL P2
PARKING LEVEL P3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES NORTH
LINE OF EXISTING
GRADE
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 5
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
SE
T
B
A
C
K
SE
T
B
A
C
K
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW (VMVR)
RESIDENCES BEYOND
VMVR RIDGE 8250.00'
VMVR RIDGE 8248.01'
70'-0" ABOVE
EXISTING GRADE
50'-0" ABOVE
EXISTING GRADE ROOF TOP AMENITIES
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
E
D
G
E
O
F
W
A
T
E
R
PATH
COPING 8265.83'
P2 -PARKING*
8199' -6"
ALTUS VAIL
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN
VIE
W
THE WREN
AT VAIL
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
THE WREN
PARKING
2
2
1
1
3
3
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A041
2
SECTION THRU LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES NORTH
1
SITE SECTION THRU APOLLO PARK/
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES NORTH Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
731
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
R0-LVN GROUND FLOOR
8222' -0"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR*
8191' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLR (P1)
8209' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' -6"
EAST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8218' -0"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
0
"
13
'
-
6
"
9'-
0
"
14
'
-
0
"
PLAZA
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 0
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES NORTH
56
'
-
6
"
18
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
6
"
9'-
6
"
56
'
-
6
"
PARKING LEVEL P1
PARKING LEVEL P2
PARKING LEVEL P3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES SOUTH
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 3
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 4
RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 5
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
SE
T
B
A
C
K
SE
T
B
A
C
K
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
70'-0" ABOVE EXISTING
GRADE
50'-0" ABOVE EXISTING
GRADE
ROOF TOP AMENITIES
PATH
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
E
D
G
E
O
F
W
A
T
E
R
(+/-) 88'-5 3/4" (VARIES)
OUTLINE OF EXISTING
APOLLO PARK
BUILDING A
15
'
-
0
"
COPING 8265.83'
P2 -PARKING*
8199' -6"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A042
3
SECTION THRU LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES NORTH1
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
ALTUS VAIL
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN
VIE
W
THE WREN
AT VAIL
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
THE WREN
PARKING
2
2
1
1
3
3
732
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UPUP
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
STAIR 1
VEST.
ELEV.
S
UNEXCAVATED
22 24 25
MECH.
23
+0'-0"-3'-0"
27 29 30 31 32
43C
26
UP
1
2
3
9
10
8
6
45
12
7
14C
15C
STAIR 2
16C
11
13
33 34 35C28
SPEED RAMP
36C
42
+0'-0"
UP
41 40 39 38 37
MECH.
17
18
19
MECH.
20
21
STOR.
STOR.
STOR.
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A051
PARKING
LEVEL P3
LEVEL P3 PARKING PLAN
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
Revised
01.06.26
73
3
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
33
34
35
36
37
40C
21 22 23 24 25 282627 29 30
45
8
7
11
9
3 2
1
10
STAIR 2
20 31C 32C
UP
12C
RAMP
39
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
38
BIKE
STOR.
MECH.
316 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
613
14
15
16
17
1918MECH.
LOW
HEIGHT
STORAGE
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
POWDER
POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
STAIR 6
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
AP UNIT
EVTR
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
UTILITYMASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
POWDER
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A052
PARKING
LEVEL P2
LEVEL P2 PARKING PLAN
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
Revised
01.06.26
73
4
STAIR 1
TRASH
HOLDING
10
9
4
3 2
1
VEST.
ELEV.
S
19C18C17
ARRIVALS
+0'
GENERATOR
6
5
8
7
16
STAIR 2
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
CON
T
R
O
L
A
R
M
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
EVTR
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
STAIR 4
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
BATH
BATH
BATH
POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
STAIR 6
EVTR
EVTR
TBD
TBD
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM MASTER
BEDROOM CLOS/
LAUND
MASTER
BATH BEDROOM
BATH
STORAGE
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
POWDER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
POWDER SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR 1
TRASH
HOLDING ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY10
9
4
3 2
1
VEST.
ELEV.
S MECH.
UP
RA
M
P
29
30
31
32
33
11
19C 21 22 23 24 27252618C17
ARRIVALS
28
+0'-0"
UP
13C
GENERATOR
6
5
8
7
16 20
15
TRASH
LIFT
STAIR 2
EV EV EV
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
14CON
T
R
O
L
A
R
M
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
12
EV EV EV
MECH.
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A053
PARKING
LEVEL P1
LEVEL P1 PARKING PLAN
0 20'10'5'
3/32" = 1'-0"N
Revised
01.06.26
73
5
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A054
NOT USED
OMIT FROM REVIEW
736
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UP
UP
UP
EVTR
STAIR 6
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
POWDER
BATH
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BATH
BATHBATH
POWDER
BATH
BATH SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
BATH
BATH
UTILITY
UPUP
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
STAIR 1
VEST.
ELEV.
S
UNEXCAVATED
22 24 25
MECH.
23
+0'-0"-3'-0"
27 29 30 31 32
43C
26
UP
1
2
3
9
10
8
6
45
12
7
14C
15C
STAIR 2
16C
11
13
33 34 35C28
SPEED RAMP
36C
42
+0'-0"
UP
41 40 39 38 37
MECH.
17
18
19
MECH.
20
21
STOR.
STOR.
STOR.
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A2
A.P.
UNIT H
A.P.
UNIT J
A.P.
UNIT H
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT K
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A101
PARKING LEVEL P3
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R1
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
7
7
'
-
5
"
81
'
-
6
1
2"
75'-11"192'-31 2"
111
'
-
3
1 2 "
11
4
'
-
0
"
4
3
'
-
9
1
4"
22'-101 2"
16
'
-
1
1
3
4"
65'-81
2"
FLOOR PLANS
PARKING LEVEL P3
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R1
14'-0"Revised
01.06.26
73
7
STAIR 1
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
UP
DN
MECH.
VEST.
ELEV.
S
+0'-0"
UP
RA
M
P
SPEED RAMP
33
34
35
36
37
40C
21 22 23 24 25 282627 29 30
45
8
7
11
9
3 2
1
10
STAIR 2
20 31C 32C
UP
12C
RAMP
39
UP
+0'-0"
UP
UP
38
BIKE
STOR.
MECH.
316 SF
STORAGE
288 SF
HOA
LAUNDRY
613
14
15
16
17
1918MECH.
LOW
HEIGHT
STORAGE
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
CLOS/
LAUND
LIVING
ROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
POWDER
POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
KITCHEN
BATH
BEDROOM
STAIR 6
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
AP UNIT
EVTR
EVTR
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
UTILITYMASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
POWDER
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A2
A.P.
UNIT H
A.P.
UNIT J
A.P.
UNIT H
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT K
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A102
PARKING LEVEL P2
APOLLO PARK
LEVEL R2
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
FLOOR PLANS
PARKING LEVEL P2
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R2
4
3
'
-
9
1
2"
7
7
'
-
5
"
131'-71
2"
62
'
-
9
1 2"
211'-2"75'-11"
111
'
-
3
1 2 "
11
4
'
-
0
"
22'-101 2"
16
'
-
1
1
1
2"
16
'
-
0
1 2"
Revised
01.06.26
73
8
STAIR 1
TRASH
HOLDING
10
9
4
3 2
1
VEST.
ELEV.
S
19C18C17
ARRIVALS
+0'
GENERATOR
6
5
8
7
16
STAIR 2
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
CON
T
R
O
L
A
R
M
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN UP
EVTR
CORRIDOR
STAIR 5
STAIR 4
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
POWDER
BATH
BATH
BATH
POWDER
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOS/
LAUND
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
STAIR 6
EVTR
EVTR
TBD
TBD
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH BEDROOM
LIVING
ROOM MASTER
BEDROOM CLOS/
LAUND
MASTER
BATH BEDROOM
BATH
STORAGE
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
POWDER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
POWDER SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR 1
TRASH
HOLDING ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY10
9
4
3 2
1
VEST.
ELEV.
S MECH.
UP
RA
M
P
29
30
31
32
33
11
19C 21 22 23 24 27252618C17
ARRIVALS
28
+0'-0"
UP
13C
GENERATOR
6
5
8
7
16 20
15
TRASH
LIFT
STAIR 2
EV EV EV
UP
DN
UP
DNUP
14CON
T
R
O
L
A
R
M
GA
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
12
EV EV EV
MECH.
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A2
A.P.
UNIT H
A.P.
UNIT J
A.P.
UNIT H
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT A
A.P.
UNIT G
A.P.
UNIT K
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A103
PARKING LEVEL
P1
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R3
FLOOR PLANS
PARKING LEVEL P1
APOLLO PARK LEVEL R3
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
3
3
'
-
8
1
2"
131'-71
2"
62
'
-
9
1 2"
150'-8"
76'-21 2"
111
'
-
3
1 2"
11
4
'
-
0
"
55
'
-
3
"
83'
-
4
1 2"
89
'
-
6
1
2"
4
4
'
-
2
"
1
3
'
-
1
1
"
16
'
-
0
1 2"
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BEDROOM BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM BEDROOM
BATH BATH
BATH
BATH
BATHBATH
BATH BATH
BATH BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH BATH
BATH
Revised
01.06.26
73
9
L.V.S.
UNIT A
STAIR 3
EHU
LOBBY
ELEV.
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
BUILDING
LOBBY
STAIR 1
ELEV.
REGISTRATION
OFFICE
MAIL
DELIVERY
POOL
LOBBY
POOL
MECH.
DN
DN
UP
UP
STAIR
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
T.
STOR.
STOR.
MECH.
TRASH
ROOM
EHU
UNIT
BEDROOM
BATH
T.
EHU
UNIT
EHU
UNIT EHU
UNIT
EHU
UNIT
BEDROOM
BATH
EHU
UNIT
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
EVTR
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
CLOSET
WC
BATH #1
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
#1
WC
BATH
MASTER
BATH
WC
CLOSET
MASTER
BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
BATH
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
CLOSET
LAUNDRY
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
DINING
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
STAIR 5
EVTR
STAIR 4
STAIR 6
EVTRFOYER
FOYER
FOYER
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
WC
WC
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
DINING
CLOSET
CLOSET
CLOSET
BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
KITCHEN
DINING
DINING
L.V.S.
UNIT B
L.V.S.
UNIT C
L.V.S.
UNIT D
L.V.S.
UNIT E
L.V.S.
UNIT F
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A104
LEVEL R0
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R4
FLOOR PLANS
PARKING LEVEL P0
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R4
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
4
4
'
-
2
"
3
3
'
-
8
1
2"
166'-0"
80'-61 2"
111
'
-
3
1 2"
11
4
'
-
8
1 2"
55
'
-
3
"
89
'
-
6
1
2"
23'-41 2"
35
'
-
6
1
2"
80'-1"4'-0"
77'
-
8
1 2"
16
'
-
4
"
9'
-
4
"
31
'
-
8
"
14
'
-
8
"
544
'
-
0
"
1
3
'
-
1
1
1
2"
Revised
01.06.26
RLUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL P0
74
0
DN
DN
DN
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
WC
BATH
MASTER
BATH
WC
CLOSET
MASTER
BEDROOM
BATH
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
CLOSET
MASTER
BATH
LIVING
ROOM
STAIR 6
EVTR
STAIR 4
STAIR 5
EVTR
FOYER
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
FOYER
FOYER
EVTR
WC
LIVING
ROOM
LIVING
ROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
SKIS
BATH
DINING
BATH
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BEDROOM
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
MASTER
BATH
CLOSET
CLOSET
CLOSET
WC
WC
WC
DINING
DINING
DINING
L.V.N.
UNIT E
STAIR
L.V.N.
UNIT G
(EHU)
UPDN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
LAUND BATH
BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
L.V.N.
UNIT A
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER
BATH
FOYER
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT C
LAUND
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
L.V.S.
UNIT A
L.V.S.
UNIT B
L.V.S.
UNIT C
L.V.S.
UNIT D
L.V.S.
UNIT E
L.V.S.
UNIT F
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A105
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
LEVEL R5
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R1
FLOOR PLANS
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R1
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH LEVEL R5
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
172'-0"80'-6"
111
'
-
3
1 2"
11
4
'
-
8
1 2"
59
'
-
2
"
89
'
-
6
1
2"
17
'
-
8
"
4
4
'
-
2
"
27'-4"
16'-71 2"
31
'
-
6
"
80'
-
7
"
35'
-
6
1
2"
16
'
-
2
"
16
'
-
5
"
39
'
-
5
"
1
3
'
-
1
1
"
25'
-
5
"
25
'
-
0
1
2"
25
'
-
0
"
BATH
Revised
01.06.26
74
1
L.V.N.
UNIT E
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
L.V.N.
UNIT G
(EHU)
STAIR
UPDN
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
ELEVELEV
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
LAUND BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER FOYER
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT C
LAUND
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
STAIR
UP
DN
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATHBATH
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT A
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A106
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R2
FLOOR PLANS
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R2
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
172'-0"
59
'
-
2
"
16
'
-
2
"
80'-1"
16'-71 2"
31
'
-
6
"
80'
-
7
"
35'
-
6
1
2"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE SOUTH
ROOF PLAN
16
'
-
5
"
39
'
-
5
"
25'
-
5
"
25
'
-
0
1
2"
25
'
-
0
"
Revised
01.06.26
74
2
STAIR
UPDN
BEDROOM
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BATH
DEN
LOCK-OFF
BEDROOM BEDROOM
LOCK-OFF
BATH
LAUND
/ STOR
OWNER
STOR.
FOYER
L.V.N.
UNIT D
STOR
LAUND
BATH
BATH BATH
BEDROOM
FOYER FOYERL.V.N.
UNIT E
L.V.N.
UNIT C
LAUND
BATH
BEDROOM
STAIR
UP
DN
L.V.N.
UNIT F
(EHU)
BEDROOM
ELEVELEV
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM PA
N
T
R
Y
LAUND BATH
L.V.N.
UNIT B
FOYER
BATH
LAUND
BEDROOM
FOYER
UPDN
STAIR
DEN
STOR
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT G
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
BATHBATH
BATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT A
BEDROOM
BATH
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A107
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R3
FLOOR PLANS
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R3
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
167'-0"
59
'
-
2
"
16
'
-
2
"
75'-1"
16'-71 2"
31
'
-
6
"
35'
-
6
1
2"
80'
-
7
"
16
'
-
5
"
39
'
-
5
"
25'
-
5
"
25
'
-
0
1
2"
25
'
-
0
"
Revised
01.06.26
74
3
DN
ELEVELEV
STAIR
DN
STAIR
DEN
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BATH
BEDROOMBEDROOM
BATHBATH
LAUND
L.V.N.
UNIT J
BEDROOM
L.V.N.
UNIT K
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
BEDROOM
BATH
LAUND
BATH
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A108
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCE NORTH
LEVEL R4
FLOOR PLANS
LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL R4
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
114'-6"
54
'
-
6
"
72'-1"
19'-11 2"
31
'
-
3
1
2"
43'
-
9
1 2"
15
5
2
'
-
0
1
2"
16
'
-
5
"
39
'
-
5
"
11
4
1
'
-
9
1
2"
12'-0"
25'
-
5
"
25
'
-
0
1
2"
25
'
-
0
"
Revised
01.06.26
74
4
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8281.99'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'RIDGE 8278.5'
FLAT ROOF 8275'
EAVE 8277.36'
EAVE 8273.61'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.83'
COPING 8265.83'
RIDGE 8278.5'
EAVE 8273.61'
EAVE 8273.61'
EAVE 8272.38'
EAVE 8272.38'
EAVE 8273.28'
EAVE 8272.33'EAVE 8271.33'
EAVE 8271.39'
EAVE 8272.61'
EAVE 8271.39'
EAVE 8273.95'
EAVE 8273.5'
EAVE 8272.58'
EAVE 8272.33'
EAVE 8274'
RIDGE 8278.5'
FLAT ROOF 8263.5'
FLAT ROOF 8263.5'
COPING 8255.33'
COPING 8255.33'
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
3" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" /
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
EAVE 8246.42'
RIDGE 8251.88'
EAVE 8236.83'
PEAK 8254.24'
EAVE 8249.76'
EAVE 8249.76'
EAVE 8247'
EAVE 8241.27'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
EAVE 8239.68'
EAVE 8239.63'
EAVE 8242.11'
8239.47'
RIDGE 8247.5'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247.5'
RIDGE 8247.5'8247.5'
RIDGE 8247.5'
8247.5'
8247.5'
FLAT ROOF 8244.16'
FLAT ROOF 8244.16'
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" / 1'-0"
EAVE 8241.76'
EAVE 8239.41'
PEAK 8247.5'
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.25A109
FLOOR PLANS
ROOF PLAN
NO ROOF OVERHANG SHALL
EXCEED 4'-0", TYPICAL UNLESS
NOTED OTHERWISE
N
0 8'4'16'
1/8" = 1'-0"
Revised
01.06.26
74
5
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
SE
T
B
A
C
K
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
4'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
KEYPLAN EXTERIOR MATERIALS
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
METAL FAUX
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
Revised
01.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A201
1/8" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION OVERALL 02
1
1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION OVERALL 01
2
74
6
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
12
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
13
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
4'
-
6
"
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
KEYPLAN EXTERIOR MATERIALS
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
METAL FAUX
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
1/8" = 1'-0"2 NORTH BLDG WEST ELEVATION - 02
Revised
01.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A202
1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH BLDG WEST ELEVATION - 01
2 1
74
7
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
4'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE 11
'
-
0
"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
P3 -PARKING
8185' -6"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
4'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
LINE OF EXISTING GRADE
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
KEYPLAN EXTERIOR MATERIALS
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
METAL FAUX
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P2 -PARKING
8197' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
4'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
1/8" = 1'-0"2 NORTH BLDG NORTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH BLDG SOUTH ELEVATION Revised
01.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A203
2
1
1/8" = 1'-0"3 NORTH BLDG SOUTH ELEVATION 02
3
74
8
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8209' -0"
R5-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR
8191' -0"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
WEST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8254' -0 1/2"
56
'
-
6
"
18
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR*
8191' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLR (P1)
8209' -0"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' -0"
EAST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8209' -0"
R5-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR
8191' -0"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
WEST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8254' -0 1/2"
EAST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8251' -2"
18
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
18
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
56
'
-
6
"
56
'
-
6
"
EXTERIOR MATERIALS
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
METAL FAUX
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
KEYPLAN
Revised
01.06.26
APOLLO PARK / LUNAR
PARK AT VAIL
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A204
1/8" = 1'-0"2 RIVERFRONT SOUTHWEST ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"1 RIVERFRONT SOUTH ELEVATION 4' 8'16'0
2"0
1/8" = 1'-0"
4' 8'16'0
2"0
1/8" = 1'-0"
1274
9
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8209' -0"
R5-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR
8191' -0"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
TOP OF PLATE
8238' -6"
WEST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8254' -0 1/2"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'-
6
"
9'-
0
"
6'-
6
1
/
2
"
56
'
-
6
"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8209' -0"
R5-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR
8191' -0"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
TOP OF PLATE
8238' -6"
WEST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8254' -0 1/2"LINE OF NORTH BUILDING IN
FOREGROUND
6'-
6
1
/
2
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
56
'
-
6
"
EXTERIOR MATERIALS
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
METAL FAUX
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
KEYPLAN
Revised
01.06.26
APOLLO PARK / LUNAR
PARK AT VAIL
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A205
1/8" = 1'-0"2 RIVERFRONT WEST ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"1 RIVERFRONT NORTHWEST ELEVATION
4' 8'16'0
2"0
1/8" = 1'-0"
4' 8'16'0
2"0
1/8" = 1'-0"
1
2
750
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR*
8191' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLR (P1)
8209' -0"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' -0"
EAST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
LVS EAVE
8238' -6"
EAST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8251' -2"
18
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
56
'
-
6
"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR*
8191' -0"
R3-AP SECOND FLR (P1)
8209' -0"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR
8229' -0"
EAST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8209' -0"
R5-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR
8191' -0"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
WEST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8254' -0 1/2"EAST TOWER ROOF PEAK
8251' -2"
18
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
56
'
-
6
"
38
'
-
6
"
18
'
-
6
"
11
'
-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
38
'
-
6
"
EXTERIOR MATERIALS
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
METAL FAUX
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING
PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL
CABLE RAILING
KEYPLAN
1/8" = 1'-0"2 RIVERFRONT NORTH ELEVATION Revised
01.06.26
APOLLO PARK / LUNAR
PARK AT VAIL
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A206
1/8" = 1'-0"1 REVERFRONT EAST ELEVATION
4' 8'16'0
2"0
1/8" = 1'-0"
4' 8'16'0
2"0
1/8" = 1'-0"
1
2
751
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
P0 -PARKING
8221' -6"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN EAVE
8274' -0"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
4'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
13
'
-
0
"
EXTERIOR MATERIALS
UPPER STONE BASE
LOWER STONE BASE
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING
METAL FAUX
WOOD SIDING
METAL PANEL
GARAGE OPENING PANELS
STUCCO
VERTICAL CABLE
RAILING
Revised
01.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A241
3/16" = 1'-0"1 TYPICAL ENLARGED ELEVATION - LUNAR VAIL NORTH
3/16" = 1'-0"2 TYPICAL ENLARGED ELEVATION - APOLLO PARK
3/16" = 1'-0"3 TYPICAL ENLARGED ELEVATION - LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
030104
04
08
08 08
01
07
06
05
06
02
07
01
02
02
06
07
01 03
06
02
06
75
2
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL. CO 07.28.2528
EXISTING
GRADE
FINISH
GRADE
LN1 8273.6 8217.5 8223.0 56.1 50.6
LN2 8278.5 8219.7 8221.5 58.8 57.0
LN3 8278.5 8217.7 8220.0 60.8 58.5
LN4 8278.5 8217.5 8222.0 61.0 56.5
LN5 8278.5 8216.3 8221.0 62.2 57.5
LN6 8278.5 8211.7 8214.5 66.8 64.0
LN7 8273.3 8209.3 8212.0 64.0 61.3
LN8 8272.6 8208.3 8208.5 64.3 64.1
LN9 8265.7 8206.7 8207.0 59.0 58.7
LN10 8265.7 8206.5 8206.5 59.2 59.2
LN11 8278.5 8208.7 8208.7 69.8 69.8
LN12 8278.5 8208.9 8208.9 69.6 69.6
LN13 8265.7 8206.6 8207.5 59.1 58.2
LN14 8278.5 8209.5 8210.5 69.0 68.0
LN15 8278.5 8212.0 8218.0 66.5 60.5
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES NORTH
MAXIMUM BUILDING
HEIGHT
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES AND APOLLO PARK
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATION
ROOF RIDGE/
ROOF EAVE
ROOF RIDGE/
EAVE
ELEVATION
EXISTING
GRADE
FINISH
GRADE
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
3" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" /
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
EAVE 8246.42'
RIDGE 8251.88'
EAVE 8236.83'
PEAK 8254.24'
EAVE 8249.76'
EAVE 8249.76'
EAVE 8247'RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
EAVE 8239.68'
EAVE 8239.63'
EAVE 8242.11'
EAVE 8239.47'
RIDGE 8247.5'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247.5'
RIDGE 8247.5'8247.5'
RIDGE 8247.5'
8247.5'
8247.5'
FLAT ROOF 8244.66'
FLAT ROOF 8244.66'
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" / 1'-0"
EAVE 8241.76'
EAVE 8239.41'
PEAK 8247.5'
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" / 1'-0"
EAVE 8241.27'
EAVE 8239.47'
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"
4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8281.99'
RIDGE 8278.5'
RIDGE 8278.5'RIDGE 8278.5'
FLAT ROOF 8275'
EAVE 8277.36'
EAVE 8273.61'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.71'
COPING 8265.83'
COPING 8265.83'
RIDGE 8278.5'
EAVE 8273.61'
EAVE 8273.61'
EAVE 8272.38'
EAVE 8272.38'
EAVE 8273.28'
EAVE 8272.33'EAVE 8271.33'
EAVE 8271.39'
EAVE 8272.61'
EAVE 8271.39'
EAVE 8273.95'
EAVE 8273.5'
EAVE 8272.58'
EAVE 8272.33'
EAVE 8274'
RIDGE 8278.5'
FLAT ROOF 8263.5'
FLAT ROOF 8263.5'
COPING 8255.33'
COPING 8255.33'
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
3" / 1'-0"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" /
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
EAVE 8246.42'
RIDGE 8251.88'
EAVE 8236.83'
PEAK 8254.24'
EAVE 8249.76'
EAVE 8249.76'
EAVE 8247'RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
EAVE 8239.68'
EAVE 8239.63'
EAVE 8242.11'
EAVE 8239.47'
RIDGE 8247.5'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247'
RIDGE 8247.5'
RIDGE 8247.5'8247.5'
RIDGE 8247.5'
8247.5'
8247.5'
FLAT ROOF 8244.66'
FLAT ROOF 8244.66'
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" / 1'-0"
EAVE 8241.76'
EAVE 8239.41'
PEAK 8247.5'
4" /
1
'
-
0
"
4"
/
1
'
-
0
"
6" / 1'-0"
EAVE 8241.27'
EAVE 8239.47'
LS1
LS9
LS10
LS5
LS8
LS12
LS13
LS15
LS3
LS2
LS14
LN1LN5
LN4
LN14
LN13
LN11
LN9 LN7
LN8
LN6 LN3
LN2
LN12
BUILDING HEIGHT PLAN DIAGRAM
GRADING KEY
INDICATES EXISTING GRADE
INDICATES PROPOSED
GRADE
LS4
8208
LN10
LS11
LN16
0000 INDICATES POINT OF
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
BUILDING HEIGHT TABLE KEY
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A801
ES PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25
LS16
LS6
LS7
ELEVATOR OVERRUN
BRISE SOLEIL
T/ WALL 8218.8'
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LS1 8247.5 8198.0 8191.0 49.5 56.5
LS2 8247.0 8206.3 8208.0 40.7 39.0
LS3 8246.0 8206.5 8208.0 39.5 38.0
LS4 8247.5 8205.5 8206.0 42.0 41.5
LS5 8241.3 8201.9 8191.9 39.4 49.4
LS6 8247.0 8199.5 8191.0 47.5 56.0
LS7 8247.0 8197.6 8190.5 49.4 56.5
LS8 8247.0 8194.0 8190.5 53.0 56.5
LS9 8247.5 8203.5 8191.0 44.0 56.5
LS10 8236.8 8188.5 8190.5 48.3 46.3
LS11 8247.0 8193.0 8190.5 54.0 56.5
LS12 8239.5 8200.5 8193.0 39.0 46.5
LS13 8254.2 8205.3 8208.0 48.9 46.2
LS14 8246.4 8202.0 8208.0 44.4 38.4
LS15 8251.9 8203.5 8208.0 48.4 43.9
LS16 8247.5 8202.3 8204.5 45.2 43.0
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES SOUTH & APOLLO PARK
EXISTING
GRADE
FINISH
GRADE
MAXIMUM BUILDING
HEIGHT
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES AND APOLLO PARK
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATION
ROOF RIDGE/
ROOF EAVE
ROOF RIDGE/
EAVE
ELEVATION
EXISTING
GRADE
FINISH
GRADE
75
3
R0-LVN GROUND FLOOR
8222' -0"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
ALTUS LEVEL 1
8226' -0"
ALTUS ROOF RIDGE
8284' -0"
ALTUS ROOF RIDGE
8284' -0"
5'-
6
"
15
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
0
"
56
'
-
6
"
58
'
-
0
"
(+
/
-
)
4
'
-
6
"
62
'
-
6
"
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -6"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
VMVR RIDGE
8250' -0"
18
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
6
"
9'-
6
"
39
'
-
0
"
VMVR LEVEL 2
8206' -0"
VMVR LEVEL 3
8216' -6"
VMVR LEVEL 4
8227' -0"
VMVR LEVEL 5
8236' -6"
13
'
-
6
"
9'-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
44
'
-
0
"
P2 -PARKING*
8199' -6"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A802
CONCEPTUAL HEIGHT IN CONTEXT -
LUNAR VAIL NORTH AND ALTUS
VAIL NORTH ELEVATIONS
CONCEPTUAL HEIGHT IN CONTEXT -
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH / APOLLO PARK
AND VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW
RESIDENCES NORTH ELEVATIONS
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES SOUTH
& APOLLO PARK TIMESHARE
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES NORTH ALTUS VAIL
754
P1 -PARKING
8208' -6"
R0-LVN GROUND FLOOR
8222' -0"
R1-AP GROUND FLOOR (P3)
8191' -0"
R1-LVN FIRST FLR
8232' -0"
R2-LVN SECOND FLR
8242' -6"
R3-LVN THIRD FLR
8253' -0"
R4-LVN FOURTH FLR
8263' -6"
LVN ROOF RIDGE
8278' -6"
R3-AP SECOND FLOOR
8209' -0"
R4-LVS THIRD FLOOR*
8218' -0"
R5-LVS FOURTH FLOOR*
8229' -6"
R2-AP FIRST FLOOR (P2)
8200' -0"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
ALTUS LEVEL 1
8226' -0"
ALTUS ROOF RIDGE
8284' -0"
VMVR RIDGE
8250' -0"
2'-
6
"
18
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
6
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
9'-
0
"
15
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
6
"
10
'
-
0
"
13
'
-
6
"
5'-
6
"
VMVR LEVEL 1
8195' -6"
56
'
-
6
"
52
'
-
0
"
4'-
6
"
TOP OF PLATE*
8240' -6"
TOP OF PLATE*
8240' -6"
WEST ROOF RIDGE
8247' -6"
VMVR RIDGE
8250' -0"
2'-
6
"
7'-
0
"
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A803
CONTEXTUAL SITE SECTION THRU
ALTUS VAIL AND VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES LOOKING EAST
APOLLO WEST GABLE PROFILE
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
AMME
11111111111141411111111111111111
MM MM
APOLLO PARK
TIMESHARE BEYOND
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW
RESIDENCES OUTLINED
IN RED
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES SOUTH
BEYOND
LUNAR VAIL
RESIDENCES NORTH
BEYOND
VAIL MOUNTAIN
VIEW RESIDENCES
WEST ELEVATION OF ALTUS VAIL IN
FOREGROUND, OUTLINED IN BLUE.
FOR ELEVATION REFERENCE ONLY.
ACTUAL WIDTH MAY DIFFER FROM
SHOWN
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW WEST GABLE PROFILE AT EAST ELEVATIONAPOLLO PARK TIMESHARE GABLE PROFILE AT WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
755
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW
RESIDENCES
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH AND
APOLLO PARK TIMESHARE
LUNAR VAIL NORTH
THE WRENGORE CREEK
TYROLEAN
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A811
VOLUMETRIC GRADE PROJECTION -
SHOWN AT 50' ABOVE GRADE
756
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW
RESIDENCES
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH AND
APOLLO PARK TIMESHARE
LUNAR VAIL NORTH
THE WRENGORE CREEK
TYROLEAN
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A812
VOLUMETRIC GRADE PROJECTION -
SHOWN AT 60' ABOVE GRADE
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
757
ALTUS VAIL
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW
RESIDENCES
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH AND
APOLLO PARK TIMESHARE
LUNAR VAIL NORTH
THE WRENGORE CREEK
TYROLEAN
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A813
VOLUMETRIC GRADE PROJECTION -
SHOWN AT 70' ABOVE GRADE
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
758
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A901
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SUMMER SOLSTICE @ 10:00 AM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SUMMER SOLSTICE @ 2:00 PM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SUMMER SOLSTICE @ 4:00 PM
SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS -SUMMER
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SUMMER
SOLSTICE @ 10:00 AM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SUMMER
SOLSTICE @ 2:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SUMMER
SOLSTICE @ 4:00 PM
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
759
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A902
SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS -SPRING / FALL
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
EQUINOX @ 10:00 AM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
EQUINOX @ 2:00 PM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
EQUINOX @ 4:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT EQUINOX
@ 10:00 AM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT EQUINOX
@ 2:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT EQUINOX
@ 4:00 PM
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
760
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
LUNAR VAIL
NORTH
LUNAR VAIL SOUTH/
APOLLO PARK
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIM
ESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIM
ESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
S FRONTAGE RD
V
AIL
M
O
U
N
T
AIN VIE
W
4
3
0 S F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E R
D
ALTUS VAIL434 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN AT VAIL
500 S FRONTAGE RD
THE WREN
PARKING
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIM
ESHARE
BUILDING B
APOLLO PARK AT
VAIL TIMESHARE
BUILDING A
S FRONTAGE RD
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A903
SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS -WINTER
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 10:00 AM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 2:00 PM
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 4:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 10:00 AM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 2:00 PM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT WINTER
SOLSTICE @ 4:00 PM
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
761
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
2 Addendum #2 - March 16, 2020
4 Addendum #4 - April 6, 2020
5 Addendum #5 - April 16, 2020
6 Addendum #6 - April 28, 2020
7 Addendum #7 - May 18, 2020
B2 Bulletin #2 - October 19, 2020
B3 Bulletin #3 - November 6, 2020
B4 Bulletin #4 - December 10, 2020
B5 Bulletin #5 - March 1, 2021
B6 Bulletin #6 - March 3, 2021
B7 Bulletin #7 - April 12, 2021
B8 Bulletin #8 - July 22, 2021
B9 Bulletin #9 - July 26, 2021
B10 Bulletin #10 - November 16, 2021
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A901
76
2
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
AP
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
M
U
L
T
I
-
FA
M
I
L
Y
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
C
I
A
L
VA
I
L
A
E
R
I
A
L
L
A
D
D
E
R
MO
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
C1
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
PROPOSED NEW
FIRE HYDRANT
PROPOSED NEW
FIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
TO REMAIN
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN -
ACCESSIBLE FROM ALTUS/MOUNTAIN
VIEW FIRE ACCESS
ACCESSIBLE VIA FIRE FIGHTER FROM
APOLLO PRIMARY ROUTE FIRE STAGING
AREA
FIRE FIGHTER ACCESS
FIRE FIGHTER ACCESS
PRIMARY FIRE APPARATUS
ACCESS DRIVE
EXISITNG FIRE DEPARTMENT
ACCESS ROUTE TO REMAIN
FIRE FIGHTER ACCESS
PRIMARY AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS
ACCESS AND STAGING AREA
(SIGNED WITH "NO PARKING FIRE LANE")
C101
76
3
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A901
76
4
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
#
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A901
76
5
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
SOUTH FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A901
76
6
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25G001
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
SURVEY
V001 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 1 OF 5
V002 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 2 OF 5
V003 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 3 OF 5
V004 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 4 OF 5
V005 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 5 OF 5
CIVIL
C100 EXISTING CONDITIONS
C101 AERIAL LADDER ACCESS & FIRE STAGING
C200 SITE AND GRADING PLAN
C300 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN
C400 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND GARAGE
A027 AREA PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R3
A028 AREA PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R4
A031 SITE CONTEXT AND MASSING PERSPECTIVES
A032 SITE CONTEXT AND MASSING PERSPECTIVES
A033 SITE CONTEXT AND MASSING PERSPECTIVES
A041 SITE SECTIONS
A042 SITE SECTIONS
A051 PARKING PLAN LEVEL P3
A052 PARKING PLAN LEVEL P2
A053 PARKING PLAN LEVEL P1
A054 NOT USED
A101 FLOOR PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P3/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R1
A102 FLOOR PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P2/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R2
A103 FLOOR PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P1/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R3
A104 FLOOR PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R0/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R4
A105 FLOOR PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R1/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R5
A106 FLOOR PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R2/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R6
A107 FLOOR PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R3/
SOUTH BUILDINGS ROOF
A108 FLOOR PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R4
A109 NORTH BUILDING ROOF PLAN
A201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A202 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A203 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A014 SITE LIGHTING PLAN
A015 SITE LIGHTING LUNAR VAIL NORTH
A016 SITE LIGHTING LUNAR VAIL SOUTH
A017 SITE LIGHTING APOLLO PARK
A021 AREA PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P3/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R1
A022 AREA PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P2/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R2
A023 AREA PLAN - PARKING LEVEL P1/ SOUTH
BUILDINGS LEVEL R3
A024 AREA PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R0/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R4
A025 AREA PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R1/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R5
A026 AREA PLAN - NORTH BUILDING LEVEL R2/
SOUTH BUILDINGS LEVEL R6
LANDSCAPE
L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN
L101 LUNAR VAIL NORTH LEVEL 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN
L200 LANDSCAPE LIGHTING PLAN
L300 LANDSCAPE DETAILS / FIRE ACCESS PATH PLAN
ARCHITECTURAL
A001 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
A002 EXISTING VS PROPOSED SETBACK DIAGRAM
A003 BUILDING AREA IN SETBACK
A004 SITE ACCESS DIAGRAM
A010 SITE COVERAGE PLAN ABOVE GROUND
A011 SITE COVEREAGE PLAN BELOW GROUND
A012 SITE COVERAGE PLAN ROOF LEVEL
A013 SITE LIGHTING FIXTURES
A204 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A205 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A206 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / MATERIALS
A241 EXTERIOR MATERIALS KEY ELEVATIONS
A801 BUILDING HEIGHT PLAN DIAGRAM
A802 BUILDING HEIGHT CONTEXT ELEVATION
DIAGRAM
A803 BUILDING HEIGHT CONTEXT ELEVATION
DIAGRAM
A811 BUILDING HEIGHT VOLUMETRIC DIAGRAM- 50'
A812 BUILDING HEIGHT VOLUMETRIC DIAGRAM- 60'
A813 BUILDING HEIGHT VOLUMETRIC DIAGRAM- 70'
A901 SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS - SUMMER SOLSTICE
A902 SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS - SPRING / FALL
EQUINOXES
A903 SUN / SHADE ANALYSIS - WINTER SOLSTICE
INDEX
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
767
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A803
76
8
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A803
76
9
Post Office Box 2134 Eagle, Colorado 81631 p: 970.949.3286 f: 970.328.6084
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A803
77
0
Revised
10.13.2501.06.26
LUNAR VAIL RESIDENCES
AND APOLLO PARK
PEC
SUBMITTAL
VAIL, CO 07.28.25A803
77
1
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 1 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK: APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY: RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE:05.08.2025
VICINITY MAP
~ NOT TO SCALE ~
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 1 OF 5
A PORTION OF TRACT D, VAIL VILLAGE FIFTH FILING, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT D;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 325.19 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT D TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 70;
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 71 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 125.32 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST 110.45 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 35.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST 35.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 133.46 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF TRACT D;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT D, SOUTH 47 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST 137.0
FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT D, SOUTH 79 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 145.78 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING,
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN BUILDINGS A AND B, APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF
FILED FOR RECORD AND CONDOMINIUM DECLARATIONS FOR APOLLO PARK AT VAIL.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NO. ABC50063954-5
1. MONUMENTS AT ALL MAJOR PROPERTY CORNERS HAVE BEEN FOUND OR SET AS SHOWN HEREON.
2. THE ADDRESSES LISTED ON THE TITLE COMMITMENT IS- 442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
EAGLE COUNTY PARCEL NO'S - 2101-082-27-006 & 2101-082-46-039
3. PER FEMA MAP NUMBER: 08037C0488D HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 12/04/2007, THE SITE IS LOCATED IN ZONE X BEING DEFINED AS
AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN.
4. THE GROSS LAND AREA: 56,347 SQUARE FEET OR 1.293 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
5. VERTICAL RELIEF SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON A POST PROCESSED STATIC GNSS CONNECTION MADE TO NGS POINT SPRADDLE (PID:
AB2083) BEING A FOUND STANDARD NGS ROCK CAP IN A ROCK OUTCROPPING AS NOTED IN THE NGS DATA SHEET AND HAVING A
PUBLISHED ELEVATION PER TOWN OF VAIL GPS CONTROL 2022 MAP OF 8287.38' (NAVD88)
CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN HEREON AT 1' INTERVALS
6(a). NO ZONING REPORT OR LETTER WAS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CLIENT OR THE CLIENT’S
DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE - PER THE OFFICIAL TOWN OF VAIL ZONING MAP ADOPTED BY TOWN COUNCIL PER RESOLUTION NO. 13,
SERIES OF 2000, OCTOBER 17, 2000 - MAP UPDATED JUNE 21, 2024 - THE SUBJECT PARCEL IS ZONE HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE-FAMILY
(HDMF)
6(b). NO ZONING REPORT OR LETTER WAS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CLIENT OR THE CLIENT’S
DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE
8. SUBSTANTIAL FEATURES OBSERVED IN THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK ARE SHOWN HEREON.
9. THERE WERE THIRTY-FOUR (34) OBSERVED FULL REGULAR PARKING SPOTS, THREE (3) HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPOTS AND
THREE (3) WHAT APPEAR TO BE TRANSPORT VAN PARKING SPOTS.
11(a). NO PLANS AND/OR REPORTS WERE PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT
11(b). UTILITY LOCATES WERE PROVIDED BY ACCURATE UNDERGROUND, LTD.
13. NAMES OF ADJOINING OWNERS ACCORDING TO CURRENT TAX RECORDS ARE SHOWN HEREON.
16. DURING THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK, THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT EARTH MOVING WORK, BUILDING
CONSTRUCTION, OR BUILDING ADDITIONS OBSERVED.
17. DURING THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK, THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT STREET OR SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION
OR REPAIRS OBSERVED AND NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CONTROLLING JURISDICTION CONCERNING
PROPOSED CHANGES IN STREET RIGHT OF WAY LINES.
20. GRAVITY FED PIPE INVERT ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON.
OPTIONAL TABLE A ITEMS: (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(a), 6(b), 7(a), 7(b)(1), 7(c), 8, 9, 11(a)(b), 13, 16, 17 AND 20)
THIS CERTIFICATION DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED PERSONS OR LEGAL ENTITIES WITHOUT WRITTEN RECERTIFICATION EXPRESSLY
NAMING SUCH PERSONS OR LEGAL ENTITIES.
TO OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AND LUNAR VAIL LAND INVESTMENTS, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2021 MINIMUM
STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND
INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(a), 6(b), 8, 9, 11(a)(b), 13, 16, 17 AND 20 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELDWORK WAS COMPLETED ON MAY 5, 2025.
PURSUANT TO COLORADO REVISED STATUTE 38-51-106 (1)(D) AND COLORADO STATE BOARD OF LICENSURE FOR PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYORS RULE 1.6(B)(2), THE UNDERSIGNED FURTHER CERTIFIES THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE, IS
BASED UPON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE, AND THIS
CERTIFICATION IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
DATE OF MAP/PLAT:
05.08.2025
RY P. RUSK, PLS 38226
EMAIL: RRUSK@FORESIGHTWEST.COM
SIGNATURE AND DATE THROUGH SEAL:
(REQUIRED BY COLORADO LAW)
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION:
1. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS DISCLOSURE REQUIRED PER 13-80-105, C.R.S.:
NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS
AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN
TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.
2. STATEMENT OF LINEAL UNITS REQUIRED PER 38-51-106(1)(L), C.R.S.: LINEAL UNIT OF MEASURE USED IN THIS SURVEY IS U.S. SURVEY FOOT.
3. THE BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY REPRESENT A PROFESSIONAL OPINION BY THIS SURVEYOR AS TO WHERE THE BOUNDARY LINES
HEREBY RETRACED WERE ORIGINALLY LAID OUT ON THE GROUND AND SUBSEQUENTLY ACCEPTED BY THE AFFECTED LAND OWNERS. THE
DISCOVERY OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE MAY RESULT IN A DIFFERENT OPINION.
4. ALL COPYRIGHTS TO PUBLICATIONS BY FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING, INC. ARE RESERVED. ADDITIONALLY, ALL FIELD BOOKS, NOTES, SKETCHES
AND ELECTRONIC FILES ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE SOLE PROPERTY OF FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING, INC. IF THIS
SURVEY IS DEPOSITED WITH THE COUNTY IN COMPLIANCE WITH 38-51-107, C.R.S., FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING, INC. ACCEPTS NO LIABILITY FROM
PROPRIETARY OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION DISCLOSED TO THE PUBLIC BY THE CONTENTS HEREIN.
5. PRESERVATION OF BOUNDARY MONUMENTATION: ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES:
1) ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT (DEFINED BY 38-53-103(18), C.R.S. AS ANY LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT ESTABLISHED ON THE GROUND BY A
CADASTRAL SURVEY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND ANY MINERAL SURVEY MONUMENT ESTABLISHED BY A UNITED STATES MINERAL
SURVEYOR AND MADE A PART OF THE UNITED STATES PUBLIC LAND RECORDS), OR
2) ANY LAND SURVEY CORNER (DEFINED BY 38-53-103(6), C.R.S. AS ANY LAND SURVEY CORNER THE POSITION OF WHICH CONTROLS THE LOCATION OF
THE BOUNDARIES OF A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND), OR A RESTORATION OF ANY SUCH MONUMENT, EVEN IF SAID PERSON HAS TITLE TO THE LAND ON
WHICH SAID MONUMENT IS LOCATED, COMMITS A CLASS 2 MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY A FINE OF UP TO $1,000 AND/OR 1 YEAR IN JAIL UNLESS,
PRIOR TO SUCH REMOVAL, SAID PERSON HAS CAUSED A COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR TO ESTABLISH AT LEAST TWO WITNESS
CORNERS OR REFERENCE MARKS FOR EACH SUCH MONUMENT REMOVED AND HAS FILED OR CAUSED TO BE FILED A MONUMENT RECORD PURSUANT
TO ARTICLE 53 OF TITLE 38, C.R.S. (18-4-508, C.R.S.)
6. OIL, GAS, COAL, MINERAL, WATER, DITCH, RESERVOIR, GEOTHERMAL, AVIGATION, GRAZING OR OTHER RIGHTS, AS WELL AS DEVELOPMENT, ZONING,
LEASE, FIRE DISTRICT OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS, BOTH RECORDED AND UNRECORDED, MAY AFFECT THIS PROPERTY AND NOT BE PLOTTABLE
GRAPHICALLY HEREON.
7. THE LOCATIONS OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT TO BE CONSIDERED ALL-INCLUSIVE AND MAY BE INACCURATE.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS MAY HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM AVAILABLE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND AS-BUILT MAPS, SURFACE MARKINGS
ESTABLISHED BY INDEPENDENT LOCATORS OR UTILITY COMPANIES, OR FROM SURFACE FEATURES. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON HAVE
NOT BEEN EXPOSED BY THIS FIRM AND MAY VARY IN ACTUAL LOCATION, USAGE, MATERIAL, SIZE AND/OR EXISTENCE. THIS FIRM ACCEPTS NO
LIABILITY FOR INACCURATE WORK BY UTILITY LOCATORS. PER TITLE 9, ARTICLE 1.5, C.R.S., UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MUST BE MARKED PRIOR TO ANY
DIGGING OR DRILLING BY SUBMITTING A REQUEST TO THE UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO. CALL (811) AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE.
NO UTILITY PLANS WERE PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT IN REGARD TO TABLE A ITEM 11(A). PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES WERE PROVIDED BY ACCURATE
UNDERGROUND, LTD.
8. ANY OVERHEAD WIRES SHOWN HEREON ARE GENERALIZED LOCATIONS SHOWING THE WIRE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN UTILITY POLES AND OTHER
STRUCTURES. THE LOCATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL WIRES WERE NOT MEASURED AND THEIR REPRESENTATION ON THIS DRAWING SHOULD NOT BE RELIED
UPON WHERE ACCURATE CLEARANCE DISTANCES FROM OVERHEAD WIRES ARE REQUIRED.
9. ALL USERS OF THIS SURVEY ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT THIS SURVEY IN NO WAY CONSTITUTES A TITLE SEARCH BY FORESIGHT WEST SURVEYING
INC. FOR DETERMINATION OF (A)RIGHT TO TITLE, (B)CHAIN OF TITLE/ABSTRACT, (C)THE HISTORICAL COMPATIBILITY OF ALL DESCRIPTIONS OF THIS
PROPERTY WITH ALL DESCRIPTIONS OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES, AND (D)EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD THAT
MAY IMPACT TITLE TO THIS PROPERTY. ADDITIONALLY, UNWRITTEN RIGHTS TO THIS PROPERTY MAY EXIST WHICH ARE UNKNOWN TO THIS FIRM. A
REASONABLE EFFORT WAS MADE TO RESEARCH THE RECORDS FOR THIS PROPERTY AND THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
USUAL AND CUSTOMARY STANDARD OF CARE FOR LAND SURVEYORS PRACTICING IN COLORADO.
10. TITLE POLICY REFERENCE: FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING RIGHT TO TITLE AND EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR OTHER TITLE BURDENS
AFFECTING SUCH RIGHT TO TITLE TO THIS PROPERTY, THIS SURVEY RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT ISSUED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, ORDER NO. ABC50063954-5, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 12.27.2024 AT 5:00 P.M..
11. BUILDING SETBACK NOTICE: DUE TO FREQUENT CHANGES IN AND DIFFERING INTERPRETATIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCES, THE OWNER IS URGED
TO CONTACT THE GOVERNING MUNICIPALITY(IES) FOR GUIDANCE RELATING TO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO PLANNING FUTURE
IMPROVEMENTS ON THIS PROPERTY. NO ZONING REPORT OR LETTER CITING SETBACK RESTRICTIONS WAS PROVIDED.
12. BASIS OF BEARINGS STATEMENT REQUIRED PER 38-51-106(1)(E), C.R.S.:
BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON THE EAST LINE OF THE CONDOMINIUM MAP OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION RECORDED SEPT. 5, 1978 AT REC. NO.
171103 AND AMENDED CONDOMINIUM MAP OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION RECORDED JUNE 9, 1981 AT REC. NO. 220646 BEING MONUMENTED
AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER BY A FOUND NO.4 REBAR WITH A 1.25" RED CAP STAMPED IN PART "PLS 27958" AND AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER BY A
FOUND NO.4 REBAR WITH THE LINE BETWEEN ASSUMED TO BEAR SOUTH 00° 02' 00" WEST PER SAID CONDOMINIUM MAPS.
13. VERTICAL RELIEF SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON A POST PROCESSED STATIC GNSS CONNECTION MADE TO NGS POINT SPRADDLE (PID: AB2083)
BEING A FOUND STANDARD NGS ROCK CAP IN A ROCK OUTCROPPING AS NOTED IN THE NGS DATA SHEET AND HAVING A PUBLISHED ELEVATION PER
TOWN OF VAIL GPS CONTROL 2022 MAP OF 8287.38' (NAVD88) - CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN HEREON AT 1' INTERVALS
14. MEASURED DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON REFLECT THE RESULTS OF A LEAST SQUARES ADJUSTMENT OF THE FIELD MEASUREMENTS.
15. ALL FOUND AND SET MONUMENTS ARE FAIRLY CLOSE TO GROUND SURFACE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
16. THIS SURVEY WAS HAMPERED BY SNOW COVER WHICH MAY HAVE CONCEALED FEATURES NOT SHOWN HEREON.
17. ANY MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON THAT ARE NOT TIED TO THIS SURVEY WERE NOT USED AS CONTROL CORNERS AND ARE SHOWN FOR
POSTERITY ONLY.
18. PER THE TOWN OF VAIL WATERCOURSE SETBACK MAP, GORE CREEK, WHICH IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO A 50'
SETBACK REQUIREMENT AS MEASURED FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE ESTABLISHED CREEK OR STREAM CHANNEL USING THE PRIMARY DEFINITION
OF "CHANNEL" AS SET FORTH IN WEBSTER'S II NEW RIVERSIDE UNIVERSITY DICTIONARY: "CHANNEL - A STREAM OR RIVERBED". - SAID SETBACK IS
SHOWN HEREON.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS, OR CLAIMS THEREOF, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT THAT COULD BE ASCERTAINED BY AN
INSPECTION OF THE LAND OR THAT MAY BE ASSERTED BY PERSONS IN POSSESSION OF THE LAND. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
2. EASEMENTS, LIENS OR ENCUMBRANCES, OR CLAIMS THEREOF, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
3. ANY ENCROACHMENT, ENCUMBRANCE, VIOLATION, VARIATION, OR ADVERSE CIRCUMSTANCE AFFECTING THE TITLE THAT WOULD BE
DISCLOSED BY AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE LAND SURVEY OF THE LAND AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. (STANDARD
EXCEPTION)
4. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL HERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT
SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
5. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CLAIMS OR OTHER MATTERS, IF ANY, CREATED, FIRST APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR
ATTACHING SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF BUT PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE PROPOSED INSURED ACQUIRES OF RECORD
FOR VALUE THE ESTATE OR INTEREST OR MORTGAGE THEREON COVERED BY THIS COMMITMENT. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
6. (A) TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITY THAT LEVIES TAXES
OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS; (B) PROCEEDINGS BY A PUBLIC AGENCY THAT MAY RESULT IN TAXES
OR ASSESSMENTS, OR NOTICES OF SUCH PROCEEDINGS, WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN BY THE RECORDS OF SUCH AGENCY OR BY THE PUBLIC
RECORDS. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
7. (A) UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C)
WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
8. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES, IF ANY. (STANDARD EXCEPTION)
9. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE
OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 11, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475. (IMPACTS
SUBJECT PROPERTY - NOT PLOTTABLE)
10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES
PATENT RECORDED JULY 11, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475. (IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - NOT PLOTTABLE - NO DITCHES OR CANALS
WERE OBSERVED DURING THE COURSE OF THE FIELD SURVEY)
11. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GROUND LEASE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 05, 1978 IN BOOK 274 AT PAGE 693 AND ASSIGNMENT
THERETO RECORDED NOVEMBER 17, 1978 IN BOOK 278 AT PAGE 682.
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF GROUND LEASE RECORDED JUNE 27, 2006 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200616928.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - NOT A SURVEY MATTER)
12. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF VAIL VILLAGE FIFTH FILING RECORDED
NOVEMBER 12, 1966 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 102538 AND THE MAP OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1978 IN BOOK 274 AT
PAGE 697. (IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
13. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF SERVICE AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1978 IN BOOK 275 AT PAGE 599.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
14. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR
RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY,
HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE
EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER
15, 1965, IN BOOK 187 AT PAGE 353, AMENDMENT RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1984 IN BOOK 393 AT PAGE 492, AMENDMENT RECORDED JANUARY
15, 1987 IN BOOK 455 AT PAGE 933, AND AMENDMENT RECORDED AUGUST 2, 1989 IN BOOK 488 AT PAGE 378.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - NO RESTRICTIONS APPEAR TO BE SURVEY MATTERS)
15. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DECLARATION BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE,
COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY,
OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR
RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 05, 1978 IN BOOK 274 AT PAGE 696.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - APPURTENANT EASEMENTS CONTAINED WITHIN SAID DOCUMENT ARE NOT PLOTTABLE AND ARE BLANKET
IN NATURE.)
16. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF CABLE TELEVISION EASEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 08, 1997 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 611627.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - BLANKET IN NATURE OVER ALL OF TRACT 3, VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING - NOT PLOTTABLE)
17. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN EASEMENT DEED RECORDED
JUNE 19, 1980 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200646. (IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
18. 40' ACCESS EASEMENT, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, SHOWN ON INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 09, 1981, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 220646.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - APPROXIMATE SCALED LOCATION PLOTTED HEREON - NO DIMENSIONS ON PLOTTED)
19. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS
EASEMENTS AND TERMINATION OF SERVICE AGREEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 05, 2008 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200825627.
(IMPACTS SUBJECT PROPERTY - PLOTTED HEREON)
SHEDULE B, PART II - EXCEPTIONS - OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NO. ABC50063954-5
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
4
1
:
3
3
A
M
77
2
SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING EASEMENT
ALIQUOT LINE
FOUND REBAR AND CAP AS DESCRIBED HEREON
FOUND REBAR - NO CAP AS DESCRIBED HEREON
FOUND ALIQUOT CORNER AS DESCRIBED HEREON
SET MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED HEREON
(R) - RECORD BEARING & DISTANCES PER THE APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION CONDOMINIUM PLAT RECORDED
AT REC. NO.'S 220646 & 17113
(R1) - RECORD BEARING & DISTANCE PER THE ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES CONDOMINIUM PLAT RECORDED AT REC. NO.
202124189 AND THE VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE GREEK RECORDED AT REC. NO. 202211953
(M) - FIELD MEASURED BEARING & DISTANCES
50' STREAM SETBACK
EDGE OF WATER AS OF 04.14.2025
CENTER-LINE OF GORE CREEK AS OF 04.14.2025
F1
F5
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598" UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598"
UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
F3
F1
F1
F3
F1
S7
1
°
3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
9
9
.
9
4
'
(
M
)
N7
1
°
4
0
'
2
2
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
3
'
(
M
)
N02°51'12"W(M)
35.44'(M)
N48
°
0
2
'
4
8
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
M
)
N7
9
°
4
7
'
5
3
"
W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N7
9
°
4
6
'
0
0
"
W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
R
)
N47
°
5
5
'
0
7
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
R
)
N02°55'07"W(R)(R1)
35.54'(R)(R1)
N00°02'00"W 583.42'(M)S00°02'00"E 324.97'(M)S00°02'00"E 325.19'(R)
S7
1
°
3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
2
5
.
5
3
'
(
M
)
N7
1
°
4
3
'
5
5
"
W
1
2
5
.
3
2
'
(
R
)
40' ACCESS & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646 & 171103
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "D"
(SCH.B-II # 12 & 18)
DR
I
V
E
W
A
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
RE
C
.
N
O
.
2
0
0
8
2
5
6
2
7
(S
C
H
.
B
-
I
I
#
1
9
)
DUMPSTER & REFUSE LICENSE AREA
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825628
PRIVATE VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ASSOCIATION EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(PARKING, LANDSCAPING & SNOW STORAGE)
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
APP
R
O
X
.
30'
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
REC
.
N
O
.
2
2
0
6
4
6
(SE
E
S
U
R
V
E
Y
O
R
'
S
N
O
T
E
"
A
"
)
(SC
H
.
B-II
#
1
2
&
1
7
)
ERW
S
D
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
NOT
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
D
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
THE WREN
CONDOMINIUM BUILDING "A"
CONDOMINIUM MAP OF
THE WREN
OWNER: WREN ASSOCIATION
LEONARD L. McCOY, PE & PLS 2432
JAN. 9, 1975 IN BOOK 244, PAGE 32
REC. NO. 140183
AMENDED AND RESTATED TO THE CONDOMINIUM PLAT
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK
OWNER: VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
JULY 12, 2022 - REC. NO. 202211953
CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
KENNETH E. RICHARDS - PE & PLS 2183
SEPT. 5, 1978 - BOOK 274, PAGE 697 - REC. NO. 171103
AMENDED CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
JAMES L. WHEAT, RLS 12488
JUNE 9, 1981 - BOOK 324, PAGE 281 - REC. NO. 220646
CDOT PARCEL 29 REV 3
FAP I70-2(7)183
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1450
RULE AND ORDER
BK. 219 - PG. 441
JAN. 5, 1971
F4
ACCEPTED AS
THE NE CORNER
OF THE WREN
REC. NO. 140183
NO
R
T
H
L
I
N
E
T
R
A
C
T
D
,
V
A
I
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
,
F
I
F
T
H
F
I
L
I
N
G
RE
C
.
N
O
.
1
0
2
5
3
8
10' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 102538 (SCH.B-II #12)
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "B"
S57
°
3
5
'
1
1
"
E
(
R
)
30.00'
40.00'
10.00'
N01°27'02"E 110.50'(M)
N01°28'07"E 110.45'(R)
F5
N7
1
°
3
9
'
4
8
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
8
'
(
R
1
)
CONDOMINIUM PLAT
ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES
OWNER: ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES OWNERS' ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
OCT. 26, 2021 - REC. NO. 202124189
20.00'
HOLY CROSS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200634246
N86°56'58"E(M)
35.53'(M)
N87°04'53"E(R)(R1)
35.53'(R)(R1)
N
4
2
°
0
0
'
3
7
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N
4
2
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
4
6
'
(
R
)
UNABLE TO SET
FALLS ON PART OF BOULDER WALL
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
1/4 CORNER SEC. 8 & SEC. 5
FOUND 2.5" PIPE WITH 3.25"
BRASS BLM CAP STAMPED IN
PART " BUREAU OF LAND
MANAGEMENT - U.S.
CADASTRAL SURVEY - T5S
R80W - 1/4 S5 -S8 - 1978"
BASIS OF BEARING
EDGE OF WATER ON
04.14.2025
CENTER-LINE OF GORE
CREEK AS DEFINED
04.14.2025
50.00'
TRACT A
(GORE CREEK)
VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING
OWNER: TOWN OF VAIL
E. MAX SERAFINI - PE & PLS 2568
NOVEMBER 15, 1965 - REC. NO.
102538
LAND SURVEY PLAT
TRACT A AND TRACT G, VAIL VILLAGE
FIFTH FILING
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
DEPOSITED FEB. 11, 2011 IN BOOK 1
OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S
LAND SURVEY PLAT/RIGHTS-OF-WAY
SURVEYS AT PAGE 781
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
50.00' STREAM SETBACK AS
DEFINED BY THE CENTER-LINE
OF GORE CREEK ON 04.14.2025
N48
°
0
4
'
4
8
"
W
1
9
6
.
6
1
'
(
R
1
)
N01°28'07"E 110.61'(R1)
N
4
2
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
4
'
(
R
1
)
7.5'
0.2'
33.1'
26.3'
12.0'
13
.
3
'
7.6'
23
.
4
'
54.49' (R)
BUILDING "B"
FOOTPRINT
BUILDING "A"
FOOTPRINT
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
N44°
1
5
'
4
1
"
W
(
M
)
154.
4
6
'
(
M
)
N7
3
°
4
2
'
2
9
"
W
(
M
)
27
3
.
1
0
'
(
M
)
S25°
3
4
'
0
0
"
W
(
M
)
81.5
9
'
(
M
)
ORIGINAL 100' R.O.W. FOR U.S. HIGHWAY 6
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS STATE HIGHWAY 78)
FAP 25-A(I)
IN
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
7
0
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
L
Y
R
.
O
.
W
.
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 2 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 2 OF 5
A. THE CENTER-LINE OF THE 30' UTILITY EASEMENT SHOWN ON REC. NO.'S 220646 & 171103 (APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION)
HAS A DEFINED BEARING AND WIDTH BUT DOES NOT HAVE A DEFINED LOCATION. THE LOCATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED
UPON THAT SHOWN ON THE ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY RECORDED NOV. 29, 2005 IN BOOK 1 OF THE EAGLE COUNTY
SURVEYOR'S LAND SURVEY PLATS AT PAGE 571 PREPARED BY MICHAEL J. POST PLS 30116
B. THE 10' UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE EAST LINE OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION (REC. NO.'S 220646 & 171103) BEING
THE SAME AS THE EAST LINE OF TRACT D, VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING ONLY SHOWS ON THE VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING PLAT
PER REC. NO. 102538. FWS DID NOT RECOVER ANY DOCUMENTS INDICATING THAT THIS EASEMENT WAS VACATED PER THE
CONDOMINIUM PLAT OF APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION. THE VALIDITY OF THIS EASEMENT IS UNKNOWN.
C. ALL EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT (ERWSD) EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON NOTED AS "NOT RECORDED"
WERE PROVIDED BY SAID DISTRICT. FWS WAS UNABLE TO RECOVER AN RECORDED DOCUMENTS FOR THESE EASEMENTS.
THE VALIDITY OF THE EASEMENTS ARE UNKNOWN.
D. THE 40' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT SHOWN ON REC. NO.'S 220646 & 171103 (APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION) HAS A
DEFINED WIDTH BUT DOES NOT HAVE A DEFINED LENGTH. THE LOCATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON THE
APPROXIMATE SCALED LOCATION PER SAID DOCUMENTS WHICH MATCHES THAT SHOWN ON THE ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE
SURVEY RECORDED NOV. 29, 2005 IN BOOK 1 OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S LAND SURVEY PLATS AT PAGE 571
PREPARED BY MICHAEL J. POST PLS 30116
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
S1 - SET 18" NO.5 REBAR WITH 2" ALLOY CAP STAMPED "5.00' W.C. - PLS 38226"
F1 - FOUND NO.5 REBAR WITH 1.5" ALLOY CAP STAMPED IN PART "PLS 27598"
F2 - FOUND NO.4 REBAR WITH 1.25" RED CAP STAMPED IN PART "LS 24318"
F3 - FOUND NO. 4 REBAR - NO CAP
F4 - FOUND NO.5 REBAR - NO CAP
F5 - FOUND NO.5 REBAR WITH 2" ALLOY CAP STAMPED IN PART "PLS 27598"
MONUMENT DESCRIPTIONS
LEGEND
FEET
1 INCH = 20 FEET
4020010
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
4
5
:
1
5
A
M
77
3
TBM-2
F5
W
W
W
D
W
W
W
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598"
UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
F3
E
W
W
C
S71°3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
9
9
.
9
4
'
(
M
)
N71°4
0
'
2
2
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
3
'
(
M
)
N0
0
°
0
2
'
0
0
"
W
5
8
3
.
4
2
'
(
M
)
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
16" MAIN
10
"
M
A
I
N
10
"
M
A
I
N
E
8222'
8224'
8220'
8
2
2
0
'
B-4
ELEV: 8218.06'
SHED
TRASHENCLO
S
U
R
E S71°3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
2
5
.
5
3
'
(
M
)
S71°4
3
'
5
5
"
E
1
2
5
.
3
2
'
(
R
)
DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
DUMPSTER & REFUSE LICENSE AREA
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
CDOT PARCEL 29 REV 3
FAP I70-2(7)183
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1450
RULE AND ORDER
BK. 219 - PG. 441
JAN. 5, 1971
NORTH LIN
E
T
R
A
C
T
D
,
V
A
I
L
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
,
F
I
F
T
H
F
I
L
I
N
G
REC. NO. 10
2
5
3
8
N71°3
9
'
4
8
"
W
2
4
8
.
3
8
'
(
R
1
)
CONDOMINIUM PLAT
ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES
OWNER: ALTUS VAIL RESIDENCES OWNERS' ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
OCT. 26, 2021 - REC. NO. 202124189
20.00'
HOLY CROSS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200634246
1/4 CORNER SEC. 8 & SEC. 5
FOUND 2.5" PIPE WITH 3.25"
BRASS BLM CAP STAMPED IN
PART " BUREAU OF LAND
MANAGEMENT - U.S.
CADASTRAL SURVEY - T5S
R80W - 1/4 S5 -S8 - 1978"
54
.
4
9
'
(
R
)
N
4
4
°
1
5
'
4
1
"
W
(
M
)
1
5
4
.
4
6
'
(
M
)
N73°42'
2
9
"
W
(
M
)
273.10'(
M
)
S2
5
°
3
4
'
0
0
"
W
(
M
)
81.
5
9
'
(
M
)
ORIGINAL 100' R.O.W. FOR U.S. HIGHWAY 6
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS STATE HIGHWAY 78)
FAP 25-A(I)
INTER
S
T
A
T
E
7
0
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
L
Y
R
.
O
.
W
.
CURB &
G
U
T
T
E
R
CURB &
G
U
T
T
E
R
TBM-1
SET MAGSPIKE IN
SIDEWALK JOINT
ELEV:8224.00'
(NAVD88)
PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825628
DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
3.1'
2.8'AREA OF CONCERN
SEE NOTE AA THIS SHEET
AREA OF CONCERN
SEE NOTE BB THIS
SHEET
40' ACCESS & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646 & 171103
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "D" SHEET 2
(SCH.B-II # 12 & 18)
10' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 102538 (SCH.B-II #12)
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "B" SHEET 2
EAST F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
40.9'
TRAVELED WAY
37
.
9
'
TR
A
V
E
L
E
D
W
A
Y
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
FOUND NO.5
REBAR WITH 1.5"
ALLOY CAP
STAMPED "PLS
27598" UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
4.6'
CURB INLET
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 3 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 3 OF 5CONTOUR INTERVALS = 1 FOOT
FEET
1 INCH = 10 FEET
201005
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
3
4
:
1
0
A
M
77
4
505
8214.48'
SET SURVEY NAIL
507
8204.20'
SET SURVEY NAIL
TBM-3
E
130840299
8208.64'
TOP OF SLOPE
130840300
8208.50'
TOP OF SLOPE
L
E
E
F1
F1
L
L
SCO
W
EW
S
SCO
130850182
8199.24'
TOP OF SLOPE
DCOG
W
L
L
L
W
E
L
L
F1
N02°51'12"W(M)
35.44'(M)
N02°55'07"W(R)(R1)
35.54'(R)(R1)
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
4' Ø CONC. BARREL
RIM: 8206.07'
8" PVC INV IN EAST: 8187.11'
8" PVC INV IN EAST (NO FLOW): 8193.56'
8" PVC INV IN NE: 8187.11'
8" PVC INV OUT SW: 8187.07'
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
10
"
M
A
I
N
S0
0
°
0
2
'
0
0
"
E
3
2
4
.
9
7
'
(
M
)
S0
0
°
0
2
'
0
0
"
E
3
2
5
.
1
9
'
(
R
)
8215'
8210'
8
2
0
5
'
82
0
5
'
B-3
ELEV: 8214.90'
B-1
ELEV: 8206.78'
POOL
BUILDING "B"
POOL
MECH.
13121505
8214.48'
SET SURVEY NAIL
13121507
8204.20'
SET SURVEY NAIL
40' ACCESS & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646 & 171103
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "D"
(SCH.B-II # 12 & 18)
PRIVATE VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ASSOCIATION EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(PARKING, LANDSCAPING & SNOW STORAGE)
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
APPROX.
30' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 220646
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "A") SHEET 2
(SCH.B-II #12 & 17)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
REC. NO. 200825627
(SCH.B-II #19)
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
CONDOMINIUM MAP OF
THE WREN
OWNER: WREN ASSOCIATION
LEONARD L. McCOY, PE & PLS 2432
JAN. 9, 1975 IN BOOK 244, PAGE 32
REC. NO. 140183
AMENDED AND RESTATED TO THE CONDOMINIUM PLAT
VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK
OWNER: VAIL MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENCES ON GORE CREEK ASSOCIATION
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
JULY 12, 2022 - REC. NO. 202211953
CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
KENNETH E. RICHARDS - PE & PLS 2183
SEPT. 5, 1978 - BOOK 274, PAGE 697 - REC. NO. 171103
AMENDED CONDOMINIUM MAP
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
JAMES L. WHEAT, RLS 12488
JUNE 9, 1981 - BOOK 324, PAGE 281 - REC. NO. 220646
10' UTILITY EASEMENT
REC. NO. 102538 (SCH.B-II #12)
(SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE "B" SHEET 2
S5
7
°
3
5
'
1
1
"
E
(
R
)
40
.
0
0
'
10.00'
N0
1
°
2
7
'
0
2
"
E
1
1
0
.
5
0
'
(
M
)
N0
1
°
2
8
'
0
7
"
E
1
1
0
.
4
5
'
(
R
)
N86°56'58"E(M)
35.53'(M)
N87°04'53"E(R)(R1)
35.53'(R)(R1)
N42
°
0
0
'
3
7
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N42
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
4
6
'
(
R
)
BA
S
I
S
O
F
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
N0
1
°
2
8
'
0
7
"
E
1
1
0
.
6
1
'
(
R
1
)
N42
°
0
4
'
5
3
"
E
1
3
3
.
7
4
'
(
R
1
)
7.
6
'
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
"
B
"
FO
O
T
P
R
I
N
T
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
8" P
V
C
DEC
K
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 4 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 4 OF 5FEET
1:120.0005
201005
CONTOUR INTERVALS = 1 FOOT
MATCH-LINE SHEET 5
MATCH-LINE SHEET 3
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
4
2
:
2
1
A
M
77
5
508
8205.56'
SET SURVEY NAIL
F1
BM 510
8199.69'
SET NAIL
512
8172.42'
SET SURVEY NAIL
BM 591
8198.73'
SET NAIL
S
W
SS
130860430
8202.87'
SPOT CONCRETE
130860431
8203.28'
SPOT CONCRETE
W
CB
F3
CBCB
E
24" CPP INVERT
SOUTH: 8182.25'
N
4
8
°
0
2
'
4
8
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
M
)
N79°47'53"
W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
M
)
N79°46'00"W
1
4
5
.
7
8
'
(
R
)
N
4
7
°
5
5
'
0
7
"
W
1
3
7
.
0
0
'
(
R
)
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
TTT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
10"
M
A
I
N
E
82
0
5
'
82
0
5
'
820
0
'
8195'
8190'8185'
818
0
'
8
1
7
5
'
81
7
5
'
81
8
0
'
81
8
5
'
8
1
9
0
'
8200'
819
5
'
8190'
8185'
818
0
'
B-2
ELEV: 8205.66'
BUILDING "B"
HIGH POINT: 8239.90'
BUILDING "A"HIGH POINT:8236.90'
CON
C
R
E
T
E
RAM
P
13121508
8205.56'
SET SURVEY NAIL
ERWSD EASEMENT
NOT RECORDED
30
.
0
0
'
UNABLE TO SET
FALLS ON PART OF BOULDER WALL
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
S1 - 5.00' W.C.
EDGE OF WATER ON
04.14.2025
CENTER-LINE OF GORE
CREEK AS DEFINED
04.14.2025
50
.
0
0
'
TRACT A
(GORE CREEK)
VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING
OWNER: TOWN OF VAIL
E. MAX SERAFINI - PE & PLS 2568
NOVEMBER 15, 1965 - REC. NO.
102538
LAND SURVEY PLAT
TRACT A AND TRACT G, VAIL VILLAGE
FIFTH FILING
BRENT BIGGS, PLS 27598
DEPOSITED FEB. 11, 2011 IN BOOK 1
OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S
LAND SURVEY PLAT/RIGHTS-OF-WAY
SURVEYS AT PAGE 781
GO
R
E
C
R
E
E
K
50.00' STREAM SETBACK AS
DEFINED BY THE CENTER-LINE
OF GORE CREEK ON 04.14.2025
7.
5
'
0.
2
'
33
.
1
'
26
.
3
'
12
.
0
'
13.3'
23.4'
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
"
B
"
FO
O
T
P
R
I
N
T
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
"
A
"
FO
O
T
P
R
I
N
T
8" P
V
C
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
RIM: 8206.95'
8" PVC INV IN EAST: 8197.66'
8" PVC INV OUT WNW: 8197.63'
CONC. STAIRS
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
4' Ø CONC. BARREL
RIM: 8200.04'
8" PVC INV IN NE: 8186.38'
8" PVC INV OUT W:8186.34'
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DEC
K
DRAFTING BY: RUSK
Scaled for 24" x 36"
Job No.: 2025040
Sheet: 5 of 5
1309 S. Inca Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
303.504.4440
DATE OF FIELDWORK:APRIL 2025
FIELDWORK BY:RUSK
REV:0
REVIEW BY: SCOTT
DATE: 05.08.2025
ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
APOLLO PARK AT VAIL ASSOCIATION
442 S. FRONTAGE ROAD E, VAIL, CO 81657
SHEET 5 OF 5
CONTOUR INTERVALS = 1 FOOT
MATCH-LINE SHEET 4
FEET
1 INCH = 10 FEET
201005
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
#
s
\
2
0
2
5
-
J
o
b
s
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
p
o
l
l
o
P
a
r
k
-
V
a
i
l
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
C
A
D
\
2
0
2
5
0
4
0
-
A
P
O
L
L
O
P
A
R
K
P
R
E
L
I
M
-
R
1
-
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
3
&
4
2
5
0
5
0
8
.
d
w
g
,
5
/
9
/
2
0
2
5
9
:
3
2
:
1
3
A
M
77
6
PRESENTATION BY
Greg Roy, AICP
Planner
PEC25-0026
Establishment of
New SDD
442 S Frontage Rd E
777
Vicinity Map
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026| vailgov.com 778
Application
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
•PEC25-0026 – Establishment of
new Special Development
District
•New SDD to allow for
deviations from underlying
HDMF Zoning
779
Background
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
•1965
•Original plat for Vail Village Fifth Filing was
recorded
•Early1970s
•Apollo Park developed as Employee Housing
•1978
•Condominium map for Apollo Park recorded
•2006
•Tract D split to create Mountain View and
Altus lot
780
Existing Conditions
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
Site Area: 56,347 SF
Buildable Area: 53,203 SF
Zoning: High Density
Multiple-Family
Geohazards: N/A
Existing Unit Count: 40
Timeshare Units
781
Proposed Site Plan
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 782
Circulation
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 783
Building Section
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 784
Building Section
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 785
Building Height
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 69’
63’
786
Landscape Plan
Town of Vail | PEC25-0024,0025,0026 | vailgov.com 787
Development Standards
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
Standard Allowed/required Proposed Complies
Site Area 10,000 SF Min 56,347 SF Complies
Setbacks 20 Ft All Sides
Front: 20’
Side (East): 20’
Side (West): 6’ subgrade
Rear: 20’
Deviation requested sub-
grade on West side
setback
Height 48 Ft 69.8 Ft Deviation Requested
Density (onsite)25 Units/Acre: 31 Units 68 Units Deviation Requested
GRFA 76 SF/100 Buildable:
40,434 SF 106,521 SF Deviation Requested
Site Coverage 55%: 30,991 SF 34,065 or 60%Deviation Requested
Landscaping 30%: 16,890 SF 16,245 SF or 28.8%Deviation Requested
Onsite Parking 122 Spaces & 75% within
the building
117 Spaces & 100% within
the building Deviation Requested
788
Criteria for Approval
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
1.Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate
environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural
design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual
integrity and orientation.
2.Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible,
efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
3.Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements
as outlined in chapter 10 of this title.
4.Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail
comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans.
5.Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural
and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special
development district is proposed.
789
Criteria for Approval
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
6.Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space
provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and
sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the
community.
7.Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians
addressing on and off site traffic circulation
8.Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in
order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and
function.
9.Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a
workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development
of the special development district.
790
Criteria for Approval
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
1.Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate
environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural
design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual
integrity and orientation.
2.Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible,
efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
3.Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements
as outlined in chapter 10 of this title.
4.Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail
comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans.
5.Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural
and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special
development district is proposed.
791
Section
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 792
Elevation
Town of Vail | PEC25-0024,0025,0026 | vailgov.com 793
Elevation
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 794
Elevation
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 795
Elevation
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 796
Adjacent Buildings
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 797
Adjacent Buildings
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
Standard Allowed/Required HDMF Mountain View Altus Lunar/Apollo
Site Area Min: 10,000 SF 56,410 SF 56,437 SF
Setbacks Front - 20' Side - 20' Rear- 20'Front - 20' Side (W) 20' Side (E) - 15' Rear -
20'
Front - 20' Side (W)
6' Side (E) - 20' Rear -
20'
Height Flat or Mansard Roof - 45'
Sloping Roof 48'Sloping Roof - 48'Sloping Roof - 70 Ft Sloping Roof 69.8
Density (Units)25 Dus/Buildable Acre 38 DUs or 29.3/acre 68 DUs or
55DUs/acre
Density (GRFA)Max: 76SF/100SF of Buildable
Site Area or
75,280 or 170% of Allowable GRFA
(42,872)
106,521 or 259% of
Allowable GRFA
(42,892)
Site Coverage Max: 55%48%60%
Landscaping Min: 30% of total site area 40%28.80%
798
Bulk and Mass
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 799
Bulk and Mass
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 800
Bulk and Mass
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 801
Bulk and Mass
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 802
Adjacent Buildings
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 803
Criteria for Approval
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
1.Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate
environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural
design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual
integrity and orientation.
2.Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible,
efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
3.Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements
as outlined in chapter 10 of this title.
4.Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail
comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans.
5.Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural
and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special
development district is proposed.
804
Vail Village Master Plan Analysis
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 805
Vail Village Master Plan Analysis
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 806
Vail Village Master Plan Analysis
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 807
Sun/Shade Analysis
Town of Vail | PEC25-0024,0025,0026 | vailgov.com 808
Vail Village Master Plan Analysis
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 809
Landscaping
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 810
Landscaping
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 811
Landscaping
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 812
Adjacent Buildings
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
Standard Allowed/Required HDMF Mountain View Altus Lunar/Apollo
Site Area Min: 10,000 SF 56,410 SF 56,437 SF
Setbacks Front - 20' Side - 20' Rear- 20'Front - 20' Side (W) 20' Side (E) - 15' Rear -
20'
Front - 20' Side (W)
6' Side (E) - 20' Rear -
20'
Height Flat or Mansard Roof - 45'
Sloping Roof 48'Sloping Roof - 48'Sloping Roof - 70 Ft Sloping Roof 69.8
Density (Units)25 Dus/Buildable Acre 38 DUs or 29.3/acre 68 DUs or
55DUs/acre
Density (GRFA)Max: 76SF/100SF of Buildable
Site Area 75,280 or 170% of Allowable GRFA 106,521 or 259% of
Allowable GRFA
Site Coverage Max: 55%48%60%
Landscaping Min: 30% of total site area 40%28.80%
813
Vail Village Master Plan Analysis
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 814
Vail Village Master Plan Analysis
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 815
VVMP - Conceptual Building Height Plan
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 816
Criteria for Approval
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
6.Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space
provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and
sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the
community.
7.Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians
addressing on and off site traffic circulation
8.Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in
order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and
function.
9.Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a
workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development
of the special development district.
817
Landscape Plan
Town of Vail | PEC25-0024,0025,0026 | vailgov.com 818
Landscape Plan
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 819
Landscape Plan
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 820
Landscape Plan
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 821
Landscaping
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 822
Landscaping
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 823
Landscaping
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 824
Landscaping
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 825
Deviations
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 826
Criteria for Approval
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
1.Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent
properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual
integrity and orientation.
2.Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with
surrounding uses and activity.
3.Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title.
4.Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and
urban design plans.
5.Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the
property on which the special development district is proposed.
6.Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a
functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of
the community.
7.Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic
circulation
8.Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural
features, recreation, views and function.
9.Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship
throughout the development of the special development district.
827
Criteria for Approval
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
1.Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent
properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual
integrity and orientation.
2.Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with
surrounding uses and activity.
3.Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title.
4.Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and
urban design plans.
5.Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the
property on which the special development district is proposed.
6.Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a
functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of
the community.
7.Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic
circulation
8.Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural
features, recreation, views and function.
9.Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship
throughout the development of the special development district.
828
PEC Recommendation
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
At the October 13, 2025 PEC Forwarded a
Recommendation of Denial with a unanimous vote of 5-0
Recommended Motion:
“The Town Council denies, on first reading, Ordinance No.
28, Series of 2025, an ordinance approving establishment
of a new special development district No. 44, Lunar Park,
and specifically to approve the development plan to allow
for the development of a multi-family development, located
at 442 South Frontage Road East and approving the
associated development agreement. (PEC25-0026).”
829
Public Benefit
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
12-9A-9:
“…Before the Town Council approves development
standards that deviate from the underlying zone
district, it should be determined that such
deviation provides benefits to the town that
outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation.
This determination is to be made based on
evaluation of the proposed Special Development
District’s compliance with the design criteria
outlined in § 12-9A-8 of this article.”
830
Public Benefit
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
•Fee in lieu for 1,374 square feet of Inclusionary
Zoning requirement, equaling a fee of $928,494.24
(required)
•Eight on-site employee housing units (required)
•$125,000 for the Gore Creek Stream Tract Fund
•Implementation of a Short Term Rental program
•Paying the Traffic Impact fee (required)
•Granting an easement for emergency vehicle ingress
and egress and pedestrian access for the adjacent
Wren property
•Installation of landscaping along South Frontage Rd
•Installation of snowmelted sidewalk along South
Frontage Rd
•100% of parking located within a building (75%
required)
•Public art in the amount of $200,000
831
Public Benefit - Altus
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
•42.7% of the project were Employee Housing Units
(15 units)
•Land donation to the Town of almost 900 SF
•Short term rental program for the development
•Paved access path and stairs through the property
for the benefit of the general community to access
the Gore Creek Path
•Reconstructing and heating the path in front of the
development and across the neighboring property
to the street corner
•Pursuing Green Globe Certification for the building
•Public art in the amount up to $50,000
832
Deviation Comparison
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
Standard Allowed/Required HDMF Mountain View Altus Lunar/Apollo
Site Area Min: 10,000 SF 56,410 SF 56,437 SF
Setbacks Front - 20' Side - 20' Rear- 20'Front - 20' Side (W) 20' Side (E) - 15' Rear -
20'
Front - 20' Side (W)
6' Side (E) - 20' Rear -
20'
Height Flat or Mansard Roof - 45'
Sloping Roof 48'Sloping Roof - 48'Sloping Roof - 70 Ft Sloping Roof 69.8
Density (Units)25 Dus/Buildable Acre 38 DUs or 29.3/acre or 117% of allowable
68 DUs or
55DUs/acre or
212% of allowable
Density (GRFA)Max: 76SF/100SF of Buildable
Site Area or
75,280 or 170% of Allowable GRFA
(42,872)
106,521 or 259% of
Allowable GRFA
(42,892)
Site Coverage Max: 55%48%60%
Landscaping Min: 30% of total site area 40%28.80%
833
Thank you
834
Adjacent Buildings
Town of Vail | PEC25-0024,0025,0026 | vailgov.com 835
Adjacent Buildings
Town of Vail | PEC25-0024,0025,0026 | vailgov.com 836
Adjacent Buildings
Town of Vail | PEC25-0024,0025,0026 | vailgov.com 837
Adjacent Buildings
Town of Vail | PEC25-0024,0025,0026 | vailgov.com 838
Adjacent Buildings
Town of Vail | PEC25-0024,0025,0026 | vailgov.com 839
Lunar Vail
Residences &
Apollo Park
442 South Frontage
Road East
1
Special Development District No. 44
(PEC25-0024 - 0026)
Vail Town Council
Revised
11/04/25
840
Agenda
1. Summarize revisions to the
plan set.
2. Review the revised building
program.
3. Demonstrate compliance
with review criteria.
4. Share Public Benefits
9/22/25 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 2 841
Development
Applications
•Vail Village Master Plan Amendment
•Special Development District No. 44
•Amended Conditional Use Permit*
•Minor Subdivision and Condominium Map*
11/04/25 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 3 842
BACKGROUND
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 4 843
9/22/25 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 5
Utility Easement
Stream Tract
Access Easements
Existing Buildings
Property Line
Configuration
125 ft Frontage
Steep Slopes
No landscaping on adjacent property
844
Plan Revisions
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 6 845
Plan Revisions
•A reduction in the height of both the North Building and the Apollo
Park Building.
•Reductions in the bulk, mass, and scale of the North Building.
•A redesigned roof form atop the Apollo Park to lower the south-
facing roof eave line.
•Increased step backs in the North Building on both the south and
north facades.
•A further increase in the west side setback.
•A reduction in the density of six residential dwelling units to 67 units.
•A further reduction in total GRFA .
•A further increase in the number of on-site EHU’s to 10 total to
comply with zoning.
•An increase in the front setback along the South Frontage Road.
•Increased landscape area to comply zoning.
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 7
Revised
11/04/25
846
Plan Revisions
•Changes in site grading on the southeast
and southwest corners of the
development site,
•An increase in landscaping along the east
side property line.
•A change to the parking garage ramp
design to lessen the encroachment on the
west side setback.
•The elimination of parking on the former
Parking Level PO.
•An added landscape screening buffer
along all the sides of the Lunar Vail
Residences South building and Apollo
Park building, and
•Increased articulation, both horizontal
and vertical, of the new residential
buildings.
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 8 847
Development
Program
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 9 848
Development Program
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 10
Deviations:
density, GRFA, site coverage, height, & setbacks
Compliance:
landscape, parking, L/D, & housing
849
Development Program
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 11
✓Includes +/- 30,000 square feet and 36 dwelling
units at Apollo Park, which must be replaced.
✓69.8 feet maximum building height at a single point
on the North building.
✓Accommodates >8,000 square feet for emergency
vehicle access.
✓Exceed the housing obligations.
✓Achieves the landscape area requirement.
✓100% of the parking is hidden from public view.
✓Minimizes encroachments upon the setback to
below-grade areas.
✓Designed in context with existing and proposed
structures in the neighborhood.
✓Fully compatible with SDD No. 42 and
recommendations for the Wren Condominiums.
✓Solves the “Apollo Park Puzzle”.
850
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 12
Compliance Criteria
Two development review applications
•Vail Village Master Plan Amendment
•Special Development District No. 44
851
Compliance Criteria – Vail Village Master Plan
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 13
•How conditions have changed since the
Plan was adopted,
•How the Plan is in error,
•How the addition, deletion, or change to the
Plan is in concert with the Plan in general.
Demonstrated compliance with at least one of the
following review criteria:
852
✓How conditions have changed since the Plan
was adopted
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 14
Vail’s New Dawn brought more than $2.5 billion of private sector reinvestment into the Vail community.
A large percentage of this investment was realized within areas governed by the Vail Village Master Plan, including the
Vail Mountain View Residences, Vail’s Front (aka Vail Chalets), Altus Vail Residences, Solaris Vail, Vail Plaza Hotel (aka
Sebastian Hotel). and the Four Seasons Vail.
As noted in Section 5 herein, a total of eight properties on
the periphery of Vail Village are developed or recommended for
development of five to six stories.
Each was redeveloped with the flexibility and consideration
of special development districts.
The Altus Vail Residences and Vail Mountain View Residences
have since been developed establishing a new development
pattern in the neighborhood.
853
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 15
Altus Vail
854
✓How the Plan is in error
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 16
The Vail Village Master Plan is not necessarily in error.
The new “as-built” condition of the Vail Mountain View Residences and Altus Vail Residences has established a
new standard for the neighborhood, resetting the scale, bulk, mass, character, architectural design, and
overall development pattern.
According to the review criteria, future
development must be compatible and sensitive
to the existing built environment.
855
✓How the addition, deletion, or change to the
Plan is in concert with the Plan in general
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 17
The proposed height is compatible with the Plan’s recommendations and the existing conditions of the
surrounding structures.
Although six stories tall, the Town found that the Altus Vail Residences complied with the Plan's
development goals, despite being recommended at four stories.
The north/south orientation of the Property
naturally maintains views of Vail Mountain
between the Lunar Vail Residences
North Building and Altus Vail Residences and
a future Wren Condominium, where 5 to 6 stories
of structure is recommended.
The Town encourages a north/south orientation of
buildings to maintain a peek of a view for many,
rather than a view of an entire peak for a few.
856
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 18
Four Stories Tall
as per the Vail Village Master Plan
“View” of the North Elevation of the Riverfront Building from the South Frontage Road
(*view entirely screened by the Lunar Vail Residences North Building per Building Height Plan
and Altus Vail Residences as per prior approval)
857
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 19
Gore Path Sections
858
✓How the addition, deletion, or change to the
Plan is in concert with the Plan in general
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 20
The new Lunar Vail Residences North building steps back the upper floors to maintain a pedestrian scale along
the South Frontage Road sidewalk and allows a greater amount of sunlight to reach the ground.
The Plan recommends that taller buildings, like Altus Vail Residences, Solaris, Vail Village Inn, The Four
Seasons, and the Scorpio Condominiums, which are up to six stories in height, be located along the northern
periphery of Vail Village.
The Lunar Vail Residences and Apollo Park
development site is similarly located along the
northern periphery of the Vail Village.
Eight properties around the periphery of Vail Village
are either developed or recommended for development
with a building height of five to six stories. This
Amendment furthers the established design direction.
859
11/04//2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 21
Six stories
1/3rds of the building is six stories
tall while 2/3rds is five stories tall
860
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 22
55’ - 0”
63’ – 5”
Roof Ridge Elevation @ 8,250 ft
FFE @ 8,188.5 ft
861
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 23
Exiting Neighborhood
Character Height
@ 8,250’
862
Compliance Criteria – Special Development
District
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 24
Section 12-9A-8 of the Vail Town Code establishes the design criteria and the findings necessary
to approve a new special development district.
“It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate either:
1. the submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of
the design criteria, or
2. prove that one or more of them is not applicable, or
3. that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. “
863
1. Compliance Criteria
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 25
(1) Compatibility. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and
adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity,
character, visual integrity and orientation:
✓The proposed development plan is compatible with the neighborhood and adjacent properties in terms
of architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation.
✓An extensive study of the neighborhood and its evolving character, which began with Phase I, Vail
Mountain View Residences and Altus Vail Residences, Special Development District No. 42.
✓This evolving trend is expected to continue if, and when, the Wren Condominiums Association initiates a
substantial improvement or total redevelopment.
✓Each of the buildings features sloping roof forms characteristic of Vail Village and the surrounding
neighborhood.
✓The proposed scale and bulk of the building are driven mainly by the requirement to place vehicle parking
below grade within a fully enclosed parking garage.
864
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 26 865
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 27 866
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 28 867
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 29 868
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 30 869
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 31 870
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 32 871
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 33
09/22/25
(REVISED)
872
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 34
Four Stories Tall
as per the Vail Village Master Plan
“View” of the North Elevation of the Riverfront Building from the South Frontage Road
(*view entirely screened by the Lunar Vail Residences North Building per Building Height Plan
and Altus Vail Residences as per prior approval)
873
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 35
Five storiesFour stories
Building height profile
follows the slope of the
ground plane below
Roof ridge and building
mass and form steps down
north to south towards
Gore Creek
“The location and configuration of structures and
accessways shall be responsive to the existing
topography of the site upon which they are to be located.”
Town of Vail Design Guidelines
874
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 36 875
2. Compliance Criteria
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 37
(2) Relationship. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable
relationship with surrounding uses and activity:
✓The proposed development includes a total of 66 dwelling units and ten (10) deed-restricted
housing units.
✓Thirty-six of the dwelling units are a replacement of 40 existing timeshare units within Apollo Park
✓Thirty-two of the dwelling units are net new dwelling units added to the Property.
✓The proposed development plan complies with the purposes of the High-Density Multiple Family
(HDMF) District.
✓The Vail Village Master Plan recommended this Property and the surrounding properties for additional
infill residential development. This was done with the understanding that the existing development
within the neighborhood already exceeded the allowable development standards.
876
3. Compliance Criteria
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 38
(3) Parking and loading. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 10 of
this title:
✓The parking and loading program proposed within the development plan complies with the
requirements of Chapter 10, Title 12, Vail Town Code.
✓A total of 117vehicle parking spaces are provided within the fully enclosed parking garage. No surface
parking is proposed. As per Chapter 10 requirements, a minimum of 118 parking spaces is required.
✓A functional trash removal and recycling program is provided inside the garage at the north entrance to
Level PO of the parking garage.
✓The trash and recycling area is appropriately sized to accommodate the needs of the development. The
traffic flow and circulation do not require the trash truck to either back up or turn around on the site.
877
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 39
Site Constraints
878
4. Compliance Criteria
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 40
(4) Comprehensive Plan. Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, town
policies and urban design plans:
✓The development plan conforms with the applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan and
Town policies.
✓Conformity with the applicable elements is summarized in Section 10 of the written narrative.
✓Most notably, the development plan conforms with the following master plan recommendations:
❑Vail Land Use Plan
❑Vail Village Master Plan
❑Vail Housing 2027 Plan
❑GoVail 2045 Transportation and Mobility Plan
❑Vail Town Council Strategic Action Plan
879
5. Compliance Criteria
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 41
(5) Natural and/or geologic hazard. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that
affect the property on which the Special Development District is proposed:
✓The Property is impacted by up to 3,144 square feet of site area with slopes greater than 40%—
a small portion of the South building encroaches on this area.
✓However, as the site is being excavated to the north, away from the slope's steepness, no adverse
impacts are created.
✓Unlike excavating into a steep slope, the intent is to excavate back away from the slope and
use the building to retain the excavation fully.
✓No soil nailing or shotcrete is required for the exposed cut.
✓It does appear from an inspection of the site and the presence of existing retaining walls, both on and
off the site, that the steep slopes were created during the original construction of the Apollo Park
development.
880
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 42 881
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 43 882
6. Compliance Criteria
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 44
(6) Design features. Site plan, building design, and location and open space provisions designed to
produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation, and overall
aesthetic quality of the community:
✓The development plan produces a development that is responsive and sensitive to the natural
features, vegetation, and overall aesthetic quality of the Vail community.
✓There are no remaining natural features on the Property following the original construction of Apollo
Park.
✓When constructed initially, a variance was granted allowing the structures to encroach into the east,
south, and west setback areas. Those encroachments are removed.
✓The development plan relocates the buildings to the north, thereby further distancing them from the
Stream Tract.
✓The Applicant has offered to fund up to $125,000 of Gore Creek Stream Tract restoration work .
883
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 45
Five-story
Encroachments
Below grade
Four stories
0’ to 2’-6” Above
Grade (< one-story)
884
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 46 885
7. Compliance Criteria
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 47
(7) Traffic. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians, addressing on and off-site
traffic circulation:
A functional circulation system is designed to address the needs of both pedestrians and
vehicles on and off the Property.
The highlights of the circulation system include:
✓A site access plan that was designed at the direction of the Town of Vail Engineer.
✓An emergency vehicle access and staging plan that an experienced life/safety consultant and the Vail
Fire Department designed.
✓A system of pedestrian sidewalks and pathways that directs pedestrian flow internally on the site as
well as connects to the Gore Creek Trail and the South Frontage Road sidewalk.
886
10/13/25 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 48
N
887
10/13/25 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 49
N
X
888
8. Compliance Criteria
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 50
(8) Landscaping. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space to optimize and preserve natural
features, recreation, views, and function; and
✓The landscape plan takes full advantage of all landscape planting opportunities afforded, including
2,508 square feet of green roof planting and an additional 3,015 square feet of landscape
improvements in the right-of-way, as recommended by the Vail Village Master Plan.
✓Landscaping and decorative paving surround all sides of the Property, ensuring a pleasant and
inviting pedestrian and outdoor plaza experience.
✓The landscaping materials do not interfere with the pedestrian walkways, drive aisles, or snow storage
requirements.
7
✓The applicant has offered to fund the cost of planting landscape on the adjacent property.
Acceptance of this offer is solely in the hands of the owners of the Wren Condominiums.
✓The requirement for emergency vehicle access consumes more than 8,000 square feet of site area, or
roughly 50% of the entire landscape area obligation.
889
4/28/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 51 890
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 52 891
9. Compliance Criteria
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 53
(9) Workable plan. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient
relationship throughout the development of the Special Development District.
✓The Applicant intends to submit a minor subdivision of the site pending the approval of the three
development review applications initially submitted.
✓The purpose of the subdivision will be to establish a new condominium map, creating ownership
interests in the new improvements on the Property.
✓This approach is common within the Town of Vail
892
Public Benefits
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 54 893
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 55
A fee-in-lieu payment to the Town of Vail Housing Fund in an amount of $, which exceeds the obligation
resulting from inclusionary zoning requirements, per the Employee Housing Mitigation Plan.
The ten (10) homes total ???? square feet in size and are ideally suited for individuals, couples, and small
families.
A fee-in-lieu payment to the Town of Vail Gore Creek Stream Tract Fund of $125,000.
The implementation of a short-term rental program is intended to increase the annual occupancy.
Granting an easement for emergency vehicle ingress, egress, and staging to The Wren Condominiums.
The relocation of the existing structures out of the required setback areas.
+/- 5,500 square feet of off-site landscape enhancements and improvements in the Town of Vail right of
way along the South Frontage Road.
+/- 2,100 square feet of snow melt heating system to that portion of the pedestrian sidewalk.
100% of the required vehicle parking is located within an enclosed parking garage.
The integration and installation of a visual public art component into the design and architecture of the
new buildings, with an estimated value exceeding $200,000.
The preservation of 36 timeshare units, which are highly occupied in the Village Core (+1,700 owners).
894
Findings and Recommendations
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 56 895
Findings and Recommendations
10/13/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 57
Vail Village Master Plan Amendment
“The Vail Town Council finds that the
Applicant has demonstrated that
conditions have changed since the Plan
was adopted, and said change in
conditions warrants a recommendation of
approval of PEC25-0025. Therefore, the
Planning and Environmental Commission
recommends approval of the
amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan,
as presented.”
896
Findings and Recommendations
11/04/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 58
Special Development District No. 44
“The Vail Town Council finds that the Applicant has
demonstrated that PEC25-0026 is consistent with the
adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail
Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the development
objectives of the town, is compatible with and suitable to
adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding areas;
and that the SDD promotes the health, safety, morals and
general welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated
and harmonious development of the town in a manner that
conserves and enhances its natural environment and its
established character as a resort and residential community
of the highest quality. Therefore, the Council approves
PEC25-0026, subject to the proposed conditions of
approval.”
897
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 59
View Looking Northeast
898
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 60
View Looking Southeast
899
9/222025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 61
View Looking Northeast
900
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 62
View Looking North
901
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 63
View Looking Northwest
902
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 64
View Looking South
903
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 65
View Looking Southeast
904
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 66 905
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 67 906
9/22/2025 Lunar Vail Residences & Apollo Park 68 907
908
909
910
911
From:Cindy Biondi
To:Public Input Town Council
Cc:Howard Willard; Robert L. Forsyth Jr.
Subject:Opposition to Apollo Park Proposed Development
Date:Sunday, October 26, 2025 7:10:10 AM
Dear Members of the Vail Town Council,
As owners of unit 404 at Vail Mountain View Residences, we are strongly against the proposed
development of Apollo Park, even as amended by the developer for consideration at the 11/04/25 Town
Council Meeting. Instead we support the Alternative Scenario created by concerned neighbors that
suggests a reasonable compromise to benefit all interested parties.
This developer's request for an SDD at Apollo Park is an extreme overreach, requiring more and larger
variances than are reasonable or appropriate. The overwhelming size and increased density of the
proposed design are simply uncharacteristic of our neighborhood. We fear that this enormous project
could result in significant change to our beautiful, private, charming, small community. We are
concerned for the future of our substantial 15-year investment in our treasured family vacation home at
VMVR.
We urge the Council to reject the developer's proposal.
With thanks and appreciation,
Cynthia Biondi and Robert Forsyth
Owners, Vail Mountain View Residences Unit 404
912
From:Sherri Hynden
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:Lunar Vail/Apollo Park project
Date:Sunday, October 26, 2025 8:30:07 AM
Dear board members/council,
We are writing to express our concerns regarding the Lunar Vail/Apollo Park project.
In summary, the project was too big, too dense and covered too much of the property and did
not include enough landscaping. The proposed buildings for the property will tower over
neighboring properties and the developers are requesting numerous variances that do not line
up with the TOV Master Plan.
The proposed development does not fit in the design of Vail
Village that we have grown to love, enjoy and appreciate over the past several decades.
As owners at the Wren, we are very concerned about the impact the development will have
on the views, the skyline and walking path experience.
We are not against the redevelopment of the property, but we want to strongly encourage
you all to stand firm and reject the project in its current form.
Thank you,
Eric and Sherri Hynden
Whole owners -Wren 402
913
From:Dan Wolfe
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:November 4, 2025 Town Council Meeting - Apollo Park and addition of Lunar Vail - Special Development District
#44
Date:Sunday, October 26, 2025 8:25:45 PM
Attachments:Dan.png
102625 Vail Town Council Ltr.pdf
Please distribute a copy of the attached letter to all City Council Members, Town Manager,
Deputy Town Manager, and the Town Attorney, prior to the next Town Council meeting.
Thank you.
914
Dan & Carol Wolfe
October 26, 2025
Vail Town Council Members
publicinput.vailtowncouncil@vail.gov
Dear Members of the Vail Town Council,
My name is Dan Wolfe, and I am writing on behalf of my wife Carol
and I. We own Vail Mountain View Residences (VMVR), Unit #303. I
am writing regarding the proposed redevelopment of Apollo Park
and addition of Lunar Vail - Special Development District #44.
I am aware of a letter sent to you by Howard Willard, representing
our HOA, as well as a coalition of the Wren and Altus HOA’s.
Therefore, I will not restate the points listed in that letter, other than
to voice Carol’s and my strong opposition to the latest rendition of
the proposal being submitted to the Town Council for the meeting on
11/04/25. As you know, the PEC unanimously voted to recommend
that the Town Council not approve this application.
We are not opposed to responsible redevelopment that would fit
with our neighborhood and the natural beauty around us. We also
support the current timeshare owners at the Apollo. We believe they
represent the legacy of Vail and are an important part of the fabric of
our neighborhood.
The applicants seems to weigh in heavily on certain parts of the Vail
Master Plan, as their reason to request a high number of variances
with significant increases in density, GRFA and height, along with
decreases in setbacks and landscaping. What they fail to do is
balance this against the Master Plan’s call to maintain neighborhood
character and to fit into the natural surroundings, maintain sight
915
lines, etc. We do not feel that the Manhattan-like density and surface
coverage fit with our neighborhood at all.
The applicant also sites the odd shape of their lot, and the required
space to allow access for safety equipment as reasons for the
excessive variances. Presumably they knew that there would be
challenges when they took on the project. The lot size and shape are
unchanged. We question whether it is the city’s responsibility to
solve their problems by considering these excessive variances? The
codes were put in place as guardrails to prevent just this kind of
development.
In conclusion, we request that you do not pass this proposal.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Dan & Carol Wolfe
916
From:slanschuetz@gmail.com
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:Apollo Park Special Development District Application
Date:Monday, October 27, 2025 8:54:13 AM
As a property, owner and neighbor of Apollo Park, I am contacting you to voice my opposition to the
development proposal that the PEC has recommended be denied.
While development is never “static “and things do change, the degree to which the proposed
development – even with its newer scaled down version – stands out as an aberration from the area
for which it’s proposed is significant.
While variances from code can be granted for good reason, the code has been established also for
an even better reason – to keep the profile of buildings to a desired size. The number and degree to
which the proposed building’s requested variances should speak for themselves. The proposed
building is too large and would result in an imposing and quite unattractive addition to the
neighborhood.
I understand new development in Vail will continue – and I benefit from that overall. However, I do
hope the deny permission for construction of the proposed structure to be less overwhelming and
less of a blight on that area.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sara Anschuetz
The Wren, # 405
917
From:Sheila Sullivan
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:NO to Apollo Park
Date:Tuesday, October 28, 2025 11:04:56 AM
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Council-
I want to state my extreme opposition to the Apollo Park Project. Its scale and attitude simply
do not belong in our village. Please don’t let greed win.
I trust that the Council is listening to the many objections presented by the constituents.
Please do not approve this monstrosity! Of course, if it is reduced to a better fit for Vail, it
should be considered. Height, set backs and landscaping matter.
Thank you for your service to all who love Vail.
Sincerely,
Sheila Sullivan
shesul@comcast.net
c 970-390-6560
918
From:Andres Sevilla
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:Apollo park redevelopment
Date:Tuesday, October 28, 2025 2:29:44 PM
To the Town of Vail,
I am the owner of Unit 402 at Vail Mountain View Residences, and I wish
to express my strong opposition to the proposed Apollo Park
redevelopment project.
The current proposal envisions a large-scale complex that would
significantly overbuild the site, resulting in excessive lot coverage and
insufficient landscaping. The plan to construct a six-story building along
the creek is especially concerning, as it would dramatically alter the
character of the area and negatively impact the surrounding environment.
The proposed density, building height, and gross residential floor area are
entirely inconsistent with the existing neighborhood and its architectural
context. Such development would undermine the charm and balance that
define this part of Vail.
I sincerely hope that the Town of Vail carefully considers these concerns to
ensure that our community remains a desirable and harmonious place to
live and visit.
Respectfully,
Andrés S
919
From:ANNEMARIE GRAMM Or ANNEMIE
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:Apollo Park???
Date:Tuesday, October 28, 2025 6:32:25 PM
Correct me if I am wrong even though I’ve been coming to Vail since opening day, that there was a hope in the
future for Vail to have it be a place of very larger high rise buildings, and that the land would be just right to
accommodate traffic and garages.
Have you lost your minds? What is thinking for destroying the beauty that surrounds us.
I know that growth is inevitable but must it be done with eye sores? Come on! We know that there are better ways.
We are smart enough to spend the time to find them.
Please try, Annemarie Gramm
Sent from my iPad
920
From:LBFamilyLP
To:Public Input Town Council
Cc:LBFamilyLP
Subject:Opposition to Apollo Park Redevelopment Proposal - In Prep for 4 November Council Meeting
Date:Wednesday, October 29, 2025 5:51:32 AM
Attachments:image001.png
TownCouncil_Apollo_Widmier_10.28.2025.pdf
To: Vail Town Council, Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager, and Town Attorney
From: Lisa Widmier, Vail Mountain View Residences Owner
Date: October 28, 2025
Subject: Opposition to Apollo Park Redevelopment Proposal
Dear Members of the Vail Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Apollo Park Redevelopment
Project scheduled for review on November 4, 2025. While the developer has attempted to
portray this project as responsive to community feedback, the revised proposal continues to
request unprecedented and unjustified variances that are wholly inconsistent with Vail’s
zoning principles, community values, and environmental priorities.
1. Variances Should Address True Hardship — Not Profit Motives
Zoning variances exist to address genuine site-specific hardships — not to increase a
developer’s financial return. The applicant has provided no physical or practical hardship
that warrants such extreme departures from the HDMF zoning standards. Simply claiming that
a project is less profitable under current zoning does not justify rewriting the Town’s
regulations for private gain.
2. The Variances Requested Are Extreme and Without Precedent
This proposal would effectively create a new zoning district for one property, granting
exceptions that other owners have been required to respect. The scope of deviation is
staggering:
Density: 55 dwelling units per acre (vs. 25) — 120% increase
Gross Residential Floor Area: 106,521 sq. ft. (vs. 40,434) — 163% increase
Building Height: up to 70 ft. (vs. 48 ft.) — 46% higher
Site Coverage: 60% (vs. 55%)
Landscaping Coverage: below the required 30%
Side Setback: 6 ft. (vs. 20 ft. required)
This is not a modest request for flexibility — it is a complete abandonment of established
zoning protections and neighborhood compatibility standards.
3. No Public Benefit — Only Community Cost
This project does not include affordable housing, does not enhance public access or
environmental appeal, and will significantly increase traffic and safety risks along the South
Frontage Road corridor. The shared access point serving Apollo Park, Altus, and The Wren
creates serious congestion and emergency-access concerns. Moreover, the proposed
921
building mass will cast extensive shadows over Gore Creek, degrading one of Vail’s most
beloved pedestrian corridors leading to the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens and Amphitheater.
4. Lack of Transparency and Fairness to Current Owners
Equally troubling is the developer’s failure to communicate with current Apollo Park
owners regarding how they will be compensated for the loss of their homes and vacation-
interval units. These existing owners purchased their units at affordable, attainable price
points, which will not be
replicable under the developer’s luxury redevelopment plan.
The developer has not disclosed what pricing or priority, if any, will be offered to current
owners wishing to return — nor any plan to make them whole for the displacement and loss of
value caused by this redevelopment. This lack of disclosure and fairness further underscores
that the proposal serves private profit, not public good.
Furthermore, the Council should take careful note of the recent Peter Knobel / Evergreen
Lodge lawsuit filed in Eagle County District Court (Case No. 2025CV30182). In that case,
homeowners alleged that the developer leveraged control of their condominium association to
approve a redevelopment sale to a related entity, unilaterally terminated “reconstruction
agreements,” and forced or undervalued sales of existing units — all without full disclosure.
(Vail Daily, Sept 2025)
While the situations are not identical, the parallels are deeply concerning. Should the Apollo
Park project proceed under similar opaque circumstances, the Town could face significant
reputational and legal exposure for approving a process that disregards owner rights, due
process, and transparency.
5. Zoning Integrity and Public Trust Are at Stake
It is deeply concerning that such a proposal — requiring multiple, oversized variances — has
advanced this far. Approving it would set a dangerous precedent, signaling that zoning
standards can be ignored when a developer demands more profit. The variance process must
not appear to favor private interests over the collective good. Upholding transparency,
consistency, and adherence to zoning policy is essential to maintaining public confidence in
Vail’s planning process.
In Conclusion
Approving the Apollo Park proposal in its current form would undermine the intent of Vail’s
zoning laws, endanger public safety, displace existing owners, and erode the natural character
that defines this community. I respectfully urge the Town Council to uphold the PEC’s
recommendation for denial and require a new proposal that aligns with the letter and spirit
of the HDMF zoning district.
Thank you for your service and for protecting the integrity of our community.
Respectfully,
922
Lisa Widmier
Vail Mountain View Residences Owner
Lisa Widmier
LB Family LP
LAW@lbfamilyLP.com
858-952-4743
923
1 | Page TownCouncil_Apollo_Widmier_10.28.2025.docx
To: Vail Town Council, Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager, and Town Attorney
From: Lisa Widmier, Vail Mountain View Residences Owner
Date: October 28, 2025
Subject: Opposition to Apollo Park Redevelopment Proposal
Dear Members of the Vail Town Council,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Apollo Park Redevelopment
Project scheduled for review on November 4, 2025. While the developer has attempted to
portray this project as responsive to community feedback, the revised proposal continues
to request unprecedented and unjustified variances that are wholly inconsistent with
Vail’s zoning principles, community values, and environmental priorities.
1. Variances Should Address True Hardship — Not Profit Motives
Zoning variances exist to address genuine site-specific hardships — not to increase a
developer’s financial return. The applicant has provided no physical or practical hardship
that warrants such extreme departures from the HDMF zoning standards. Simply claiming
that a project is less profitable under current zoning does not justify rewriting the Town’s
regulations for private gain.
2. The Variances Requested Are Extreme and Without Precedent
This proposal would effectively create a new zoning district for one property, granting
exceptions that other owners have been required to respect. The scope of deviation is
staggering:
• Density: 55 dwelling units per acre (vs. 25) — 120% increase
• Gross Residential Floor Area: 106,521 sq. ft. (vs. 40,434) — 163% increase
• Building Height: up to 70 ft. (vs. 48 ft.) — 46% higher
• Site Coverage: 60% (vs. 55%)
• Landscaping Coverage: below the required 30%
• Side Setback: 6 ft. (vs. 20 ft. required)
This is not a modest request for flexibility — it is a complete abandonment of established
zoning protections and neighborhood compatibility standards.
924
2 | Page TownCouncil_Apollo_Widmier_10.28.2025.docx
3. No Public Benefit — Only Community Cost
This project does not include affordable housing, does not enhance public access or
environmental appeal, and will significantly increase traffic and safety risks along the
South Frontage Road corridor. The shared access point serving Apollo Park, Altus, and The
Wren creates serious congestion and emergency-access concerns. Moreover, the
proposed building mass will cast extensive shadows over Gore Creek, degrading one of
Vail’s most beloved pedestrian corridors leading to the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens and
Amphitheater.
4. Lack of Transparency and Fairness to Current Owners
Equally troubling is the developer’s failure to communicate with current Apollo Park
owners regarding how they will be compensated for the loss of their homes and vacation-
interval units. These existing owners purchased their units at affordable, attainable price
points, which will not be replicable under the developer’s luxury redevelopment plan.
The developer has not disclosed what pricing or priority, if any, will be offered to current
owners wishing to return — nor any plan to make them whole for the displacement and loss
of value caused by this redevelopment. This lack of disclosure and fairness further
underscores that the proposal serves private profit, not public good.
Furthermore, the Council should take careful note of the recent Peter Knobel / Evergreen
Lodge lawsuit filed in Eagle County District Court (Case No. 2025CV30182). In that case,
homeowners alleged that the developer leveraged control of their condominium
association to approve a redevelopment sale to a related entity, unilaterally terminated
“reconstruction agreements,” and forced or undervalued sales of existing units — all
without full disclosure. (Vail Daily, Sept 2025)
While the situations are not identical, the parallels are deeply concerning. Should the
Apollo Park project proceed under similar opaque circumstances, the Town could face
significant reputational and legal exposure for approving a process that disregards owner
rights, due process, and transparency.
925
3 | Page TownCouncil_Apollo_Widmier_10.28.2025.docx
5. Zoning Integrity and Public Trust Are at Stake
It is deeply concerning that such a proposal — requiring multiple, oversized variances —
has advanced this far. Approving it would set a dangerous precedent, signaling that zoning
standards can be ignored when a developer demands more profit. The variance process
must not appear to favor private interests over the collective good. Upholding
transparency, consistency, and adherence to zoning policy is essential to maintaining
public confidence in Vail’s planning process.
In Conclusion
Approving the Apollo Park proposal in its current form would undermine the intent of Vail’s
zoning laws, endanger public safety, displace existing owners, and erode the natural
character that defines this community. I respectfully urge the Town Council to uphold the
PEC’s recommendation for denial and require a new proposal that aligns with the letter
and spirit of the HDMF zoning district.
Thank you for your service and for protecting the integrity of our community.
Respectfully,
Lisa Widmier
Vail Mountain View Residences Owner
926
From:TOM TYREE
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:Apollo Park Redevelopment Project
Date:Wednesday, October 29, 2025 11:10:55 AM
My name is Tom Tyree and, on behalf of the Tyree family, I am writing in support of the fine work
being done for our community with respect to the Apollo Park redevelopment project. By way of
background, we live in Northwoods on Vail Valley Drive with direct views over the Ford
amphitheater and Apollo Park to the mountainside across the interstate.
We are aware of the coalition of the boards of VMVR, Altus and Wren HOA and many of their
homeowners, which is focused on creating a project that will benefit Vail and the Apollo Park
environs. Like our neighbors, we are opposed to the Apollo Park Redevelopment Proposal
submitted to the Vail Town Council for the 10/13/25 PEC meeting.
Make no mistake - we support responsible development in Vail, and we strongly support the
Alternate Development Proposal submitted by the neighborhood coalition, which is thoughtful
and balanced.
The Apollo Park Redevelopment Proposal is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood and
would have a negative impact on neighbors’ property values and enjoyment. The proposed
redevelopment would also create an unattractive view from I-70, exacerbating the Christmas-tree-
like fiasco of a hundred green exit signs which currently greets westbound travelers as they
approach our town (btw, how did that get approved?). As well, the proposed redevelopment would
impair the peaceful path that follows Gore Creek on the way to the botanical gardens, Ford Park and
the athletic fields. Finally, the proposal as submitted would impair our viewshed, from the
residences south of the park, to the mountainside across the interstate.
This project application is unique given the massive variances requested by the developer. It is also
unique regarding the developer's unwillingness to adequately respond to feedback from both PEC
members and the neighbors. After receiving significant input during the 9/22/25 meeting that the
development was too large, the developer ignored that feedback and presented a new proposal
with an increase in GRFA of 1,693 square feet for consideration at the 10/13/25 meeting.
The Alternate Development Plan submitted by the neighborhood coalition also includes variances
(albeit more reasonable and consistent), and the PEC may determine that even these variances are
too imposing. In that case, we defer to their judgement. The Alternate Development Proposal
reflects a willingness to accommodate significant and responsible redevelopment of the site. We
hope both the developer and the PEC will be willing to support this proposal.
We are aware that you have received materials from the neighborhood coalition describing
suggested changes to the developer's 10/13/25 proposal and a comparison of the Alternate Proposal
to the developer’s. Key takeaways from this analysis include:
• The developer's SDD proposed on 10/13/25 is requesting a greater number (6 vs. 4) and much
larger variances (69% vs. 27%) than previously
927
approved in the most relevant and comparable prior project, SDD #42, creating a new, damaging
precedent for future development
• The request for a new above ground site coverage and landscaping variances, where none were
required for SDD #42, is particularly alarming
• The request for a Dwelling Units per Acre variance of 120% of the HDMF
requirement compared to 17% in SDD #42 is egregious.
• The request for a GRFA variance at 163% of the HDF requirement, compared to 76% in SDD #42, is
clearly unfair to the neighbors
• The request for a height variance of 46% is similar to SDD #42, but without the large number of
onsite EHUs at Altus, which represents an overreach with no offsetting community benefit of
reasonable EHU additions.
The Alternate Development proposal still requires variances that significantly exceed the precedent
set for SDD #42, but we are willing to support these higher variances in order to create a winning
proposal for Vail, the neighbors and the developer.
Please consider our comments above in the spirit they are intended - constructive, supportive of
responsible development, and consistent with reasonable past precedents.
We appreciate your consideration of our perspectives. Please feel free to reach out to me with any
questions using the contact information below.
Sincerely, TT
Tom Tyree
303-594-8794
tbtyree@outlook.com
928
From:Justin Astley
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:Lunar park development
Date:Thursday, October 30, 2025 11:15:05 AM
Attachments:Altus TC HOA Letter (2).docx
Good morning,
Please see my attached letter in opposition of the current Lunar Park proposal.
Thank you,
Justin
--
Justin Astley
303-589-2941
929
To: Vail Town Council, Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager and Town Attorney
Email: publicinput.vailtowncouncil@vail.gov
Date: 10/27/25
From: Justin Astley, Altus HOA Vice President and owner of Unit #401
My name is Justin Astley and my family and I are full time residents in Vail. The Altus HOA and I have been
working with Howard Willard and the coalition of neighboring HOAs and Homeowners to oppose the
Apollo Park redevelopment application to be presented at the 11/04/25 Town Council Meeting. On
behalf of the Altus HOA we oppose the Apollo Park redevelopment application. We agree with Mr.
Willard on the reasons to deny the application.
The developer has often justified their request for massive variances by referencing the VMVR / Altus SDD
#42. We would Iike to point out some big differences between SDD #42 and the Apollo Park SDD seeking
approval at the upcoming Town Council Meeting. First, The VMVR / Altus SDD #42 required no variance
for Above Ground Site Coverage, Landscaping and building height along Gore Creek. The Apollo Park
redevelopment is seeking a variance to allow 60% (verses 55% HDMF limit) Above Ground Site Coverage
and a landscaping variance. The creek side building within SDD#42 was compliant with the HDMF height
limit of 48’. These three key differences between the SDD applications represent a significant
contribution to the fact that the requested Apollo Park redevelopment is incompatible with the
surrounding neighborhood. We also point out that the average variance requested for the Apollo Park
redevelopment is 69% of the HDMF Limit, more than double the comparable variance of 29% required for
SDD #42.
Let me describe how the proposed Apollo Park will reduce the property values and enjoyment for
residents at Altus. First, the proposed new Apollo Park building will be significantly taller than the existing
building and 64’ tall verses an HDMF limit of 48’. The new Lunar Vail North will be 70’. The taller Apollo
Park building and the new Lunar Vail North building will greatly reduce the mountain views our residents
have from their south and east facing windows. The 70 foot tall Lunar Vail North building will tower over
our path to the creek and reduce air flow to our south facing windows. The massive density of the new
development is going to significantly increase traffic on South Frontage Road. The increased traffic at the
three way intersection of South Frontage Road and Vail Valley Drive is going to make an already
dangerous situation more dangerous. Several of our residents, both adults and children, have
experienced near collision events as pedestrians when vehicles speed through that intersection without
stopping.
Why we helped create the Alternate Scenario:
Our Alternate Scenario represents a compromise that is a win for the developer, the current residents at
Apollo Park, the neighbors and the town of Vail. However, we are convinced that the developer will not
seriously consider it until their current egregious development which has already been rejected by the
Town Staff and a unanimous vote of the PEC is rejected by the Vail Town Council.
930
From:jim stathis.com
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:Opposition to Apollo Park Redevelopment Proposal
Date:Thursday, October 30, 2025 2:03:40 PM
Attachments:2025 10 29 VMC owner opposing application.pdf
To Whom It May Concern:
Please find attached my letter in opposition to the proposed Apollo Park Redevelopment. I
appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing my concerns.
Thank you,
James Stathis
Vail Mountain View Residences Unit #202
Confidentiality Notice: This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email. Any unauthorized use or
distribution is prohibited.
931
To: Vail Town Council, Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager, and Town Attorney
Date: 10/28/2025
From: James Stathis, Vail Mountain View Residences
Subject: Opposition to Apollo Park Redevelopment Proposal
Via email to: publicinput.vailtowncouncil@vail.gov
Dear Members of the Vail Town Council,
As Vail Mountain View Residences owner, I am writing to strongly oppose the proposed
Apollo Park Redevelopment Project scheduled for review at the November 4, 2025 Town
Council meeting.
1. Variances Are Reserved for Genuine Hardships — Not for Increasing Developer
Profits
Variances are intended to address legitimate hardships unique to a property — not to
enhance a developer’s flnancial return. What exactly is the “hardship” here? The developer
has not presented any physical or practical constraint that justifles such extreme
variances. Simply claiming that proflts are insufficient under existing zoning is not, and
should never be, a valid reason for the Town to discard its own regulations.
2. The Variances Requested Are Extreme and Without Precedent
The proposed “Special Development District” would effectively rewrite the HDMF zoning
code for this site. Howard Willard, the head of our committee on Apollo Park has spent
months studying the variances requested and will deal with the speciflcs. Suffice it to say
they are outrageous.
The requested Variances are not a modest request for fiexibility — it’s a wholesale
departure from the standards that every other property owner in the area has respected.
The scale, massing, and intensity of this project are completely inconsistent with the
neighborhood and with the Town’s own HDMF zoning principles.
3. The Town’s Consideration of Such an Overreaching Proposal Raises Serious
Concerns
It is troubling that a proposal this far outside the bounds of established zoning has
advanced to this stage of review. While I do not question anyone’s integrity, the mere fact
that such extreme variances are being seriously considered naturally leads residents to
wonder: what possible public benefit justifies this level of exception?
A variance process should never appear to favor private developers over the interests of
existing residents and the broader community. Transparency, consistency, and adherence
932
to zoning policy are essential to maintaining public trust in the Town’s governance and
planning process.
4. A More Reasonable Path Exists
The Neighborhood Coalition has already presented a balanced “Alternate Scenario” that
demonstrates a fair and thoughtful approach. It allows for redevelopment and growth while
maintaining equity for the developer, existing owners, and the Town. The only reason this
reasonable plan has not been pursued is that the developer insists on moving forward with
an excessively large project
In Conclusion
Approving the Apollo Park proposal as submitted would set a dangerous precedent,
effectively rewarding excessive variance requests and undermining confldence in Vail’s
zoning framework. I respectfully urge the Town Council to deny this proposal in its current
form and encourage the developer to return with a project that is consistent with both the
letter and spirit of the HDMF zoning district.
Sincerely,
James Stathis
Owner, Vail Mountain View Residences
Your Unit #202
933
To: Vail PEC
Date: 11/2/2025
From: Ivan Erobkin, Owner of Penthouse #406 Altus
Dear Vail PEC Members,
My name is Ivan Erobkin, and I am the owner of Penthouse #406 at the Altus Building. I am
writing to express my strong opposition to the Apollo Park redevelopment proposal that will be
presented at the upcoming meeting on November 4th, 2025.
The proposed development is incompatible with the character of our neighborhood and poses a
significant risk to the enjoyment and value of our properties. The current plans for Apollo Park,
as submitted, would result in a building that is excessively tall and massive, casting shadows
over our community and obstructing our views and negatively impacting our lives and our
property values.
Moreover, the proposed density of the project exceeds reasonable limits, with an alarming
number of units per acre that would negatively impact the surrounding area. The associated
variances requested, particularly for site coverage and landscaping, are concerning. The proposed
landscaping does not adequately address the need to maintain the aesthetic and environmental
integrity of our neighborhood.
I strongly agree with and support all of Mr. Howard Willards’ and my neighbors and HOA’s
comments and arguments opposing this project and I respectfully request that you support our
coalition’s efforts and advocate for a development plan that aligns with the needs and values of
our community.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Ivan Erobkin
Owner, Penthouse #406 Altus
934
From:Nat Cuthbert
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:Please deny inappropriate Apollo Park redevelopment
Date:Sunday, November 2, 2025 6:38:27 PM
Attachments:7b49e51d-48fd-4e48-9530-c4eabef4f6da.png
My name is Nat Cuthbert and my family has been visiting Vail for 35+ years. We typically
spend 2 -3 weeks a year in town enjoying skiing, mountain scenery and great food. In the
early years we stayed at the Apollo Park Lodge and now with grand kids along we often
stay at Vail Mountain View Residences. Below is a favorite photo taken on the site of the
Apollo Park Lodge, during our oldest child’s first ski trip (at age 5 weeks)! From then, it
was off and running, with 3 more children to follow. All became beautiful skiers at Vail.
Our third child loved Vail so much that he worked as a Vail ski school instructor. He is
now an orthopedic surgeon, so perhaps the Vail experience had an effect on his career
path!
I recently learned of the proposal to redevelop Apollo Park with a development that is so
large that it would ruin the neighborhood and change the character of that Vail
neighborhood.
We were surprised that the Altus building that towers over the neighborhood and blocks
the mountain view when approaching Vail on I-70 was allowed. My understanding is that
the Apollo Park proposal requires more and much larger variances. Please protect Vail
and deny the application. My family and I can go to another resort town that is still
preserving its character, but we do not want to be forced to do that. We have 35+ years
of family tradition in Vail and want it to continue. We also feel for the friends that we
have made who own condos in the neighborhood. Their decisions to invest in their
homes were likely affected by a belief that Vail regulations would guide any future
development along an acceptable path. A significant and detrimental change betrays
935
the trust they placed in the town of Vail. If Vail allows this massive new development to
occur they cannot leave as easily as we can leave.
Please be observant of the Vail’s responsibility to be a good steward of a beautiful
mountain, to honor commitments made to owners, and to preserve a tremendous asset
for visitors, by denying the redevelopment application.
Yours truly,
Nat Cuthbert
936
From:Debbie Charles
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:Apollo/Lunar Vail Application 11/04 Meeting
Date:Monday, November 3, 2025 10:41:33 AM
My name is Debbie Charles, HOA board member and whole unit owner at The Wren.
I have been working with Howard Willard and the coalition of neighboring HOAs that oppose the
Lunar Vail proposal and support the Alternative Plan Mr. Willard has submitted.
The 9/08 PEC submission was at 113,000 GRFA and the size has only been reduced 6% to 106,000,
despite being told by the PEC that the project was way too big. To put the currently proposed size
of the project into perspective, the lot that includes Vail Mountain View, together with Altus, is
about the same size as the current Apollo Park lot at 1.3 acres. Vail Mountain View / Altus has a
very small pool and not much green space. Including employee housing, the developer of Lunar
Vail is requesting to almost double the number of units on the same size lot. It is too many units in
too small a space.
However, I want to add a primary reason for denial of the redevelopment application. The bottom
three levels of the garage will be reached by driving back into the site on the east-side driveway
that is directly adjacent to the Wren pool and the north-facing windows of our units. The bottom
three levels of the garage contain 97% of the parking for the entire building, or 113 spots. The top
floor of the garage that is entered off of the South Frontage Road contains only 4 parking spots.
The developer has not agreed to moderate the size of the Lunar Vail North building to allow a 10’
landscaping buffer between the east driveway and the Wren Property Line. There will be a
massive increase in the number of cars entering the site given the developer’s request for 55
dwelling units per acre compared to the HDMF limit of 25 DUs per acre. The high volume of cars
will drive adjacent to the Wren pool and courtyard and head lights will shine in the north facing
unit windows at night.
In the current plan, the developer is removing the current, fairly mature trees along our shared
boundary as there is only one foot between the property line and the driveway to the back of the
building. If the easement was extended west ten feet, they could keep the current trees to help to
block headlights and they also help reduce traffic noise. This will also help create more privacy
from the very tall building that will tower over our courtyard and pool. Revisions to the project
should include this easement change, as well as a height reduction.
I question where Fire Free Five comes into play. I know that a new ordinance is being written that
will certainly not allow landscaping on the roof of a building. Greenspace should be in the
appropriate areas so it will remain there when a Fire Free Five ordinance is in place.
In summary, please join the Town Staff and the Vail PEC in denying this application. The
Alternative Scenario that Howard Willard proposed should be considered, but even something
smaller would be much more appropriate, considering the lot size and neighborhood.
937
938
From:jay levine
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:Apollo Park SDD and Vatiance Requests
Date:Monday, November 3, 2025 12:29:22 PM
My name is Jay Levine and I am President of the Vail Mountain View HOA.
This entire Apollo Park Redevelopment proposal, its special development district
and variance requests, can be characterized by 2 words.
Greed and Arrogance
This is the 5th Town of Vail meeting I have attended on this subject over the past 7
months.
That’s in addition to the meetings and zoom calls with George Ruther, the face, but
not the driving force of this obscenely huge project.
At every turn, Ron Byrne has been met with a resounding NO!
From the neighbors, from the PEC Staff, and from the PEC itself.
A unanimous and unequivocal No!
Yet each time, Byrne has sent Ruther back with virtually the same ask; paying little
more than lip service to everyone’s objections.
Just what part of the word NO does Ron Byrne not understand?
It can only be arrogance that makes makes him send Ruther back in again and again
when he knows all his neighbors, veteran planner Greg Roy, and the entire PEC
have repeatedly in discussion, investigation, and vote, said this proposal is a non-
starter; incompatible with the neighborhood as well as Vail’s master plan.
For any reasonable developer, The formal recommendation by the PEC that the
Town Council deny these requests, would have prompted some real soul searching
and a back to the drawing board board approach.
Not this developer.
For here he is again. With the same old proposal for a new special development
district with its through the roof variance requests that any reasonable developer
would have modified months ago.
939
He is obviously so blinded by the dollar signs dancing around in his brain, focused
on his own profit, even if it comes at the expense of ruining the neighborhood that
he can’t see that he should not and, we hope, will not be able foist this ill-advised
project on us.
The developer will tell you that they have worked hard for 7 months to listen to the
neighbors and make reductions in the height and density of the development. They
express “surprise” that the PEC and the neighbors are not delighted with their
solution to the Apollo Park puzzle.
Please.
This is the same developer who 10 years ago, lied to the PEC about Vail Mountain
View’s approval of his plans for Altus. By illegally stacking what should have been
an HOA board with his friends and cronies.
We saw through that one, just as we see through this one.
Back then, we were able to work with his former partner Pete Carlson and,
ironically. WITH George Ruther to come up with a plan for Altus that everyone got
behind.
George is on the other side this time. The wrong side.
And instead of looking at the reasonable Alternate Proposal which our committee
chair Howard Willard has researched and shared with you, he keeps coming back
again and again with the same old pie in the sky plans which haven’t passed muster
in any forum yet.
I won’t take up your time detailing Howard’s derailed and painstakingly researched
plan for what WILL work in our neighborhood, but I hope you’ll give it the
attention worthy of the time it took to put together.
It’s a mystery to us why Ron Byrne thinks you’ll ignore us and the rest of his
neighbors, all the town planners and the Unanimous recommendation from the PEC
940
and do anything but turn him down again.
941
From:Justin Astley
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:Lunar park Letter Unit B
Date:Tuesday, November 4, 2025 10:38:24 AM
Attachments:Apollo Park Request to Deny letter - Graybill Altus unit B.docx
Good morning,
I am forwarding a letter on behalf of unit B at Altus. My apology that it is coming in so late.
Best,
Justin
--
Justin Astley
303-589-2941
942
To: Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission
Re: Apollo Park / “Lunar Vail” Redevelopment – Request to Deny or Significantly Reduce Variances
Dear Commissioners,
I am an owner at Altus Vail unit B, and I’m writing regarding the Apollo Park/Lunar Vail proposal currently
before the PEC. I support appropriate redevelopment, but I oppose the project as proposed due to its
excessive height, mass, and variance requests, and the associated impacts on light, views, privacy,
streetscape, and the Gore Creek pathway.
My primary concerns:
• Height well above the 48’ zoning limit (requests up to ~66’ at the creek and ~78’ along Frontage Road),
which is out of scale with adjacent buildings and will loom over neighbors and the creek corridor.
• Mass/GRFA increase from roughly 29,000 to ~113,000 sq. ft., where the code allows ~40,000, creating
a bulky, wall-like presence.
• Unit count expansion to ~73, where ~31 are permitted, intensifying use and scale.
• Setbacks/Open space reductions (e.g., a 20’ code setback reduced to ~1’ in one area), undermining
sunlight, landscaping viability, and neighborhood character.
• Two above-grade parking levels that produce an unattractive, inactive façade on the street and
exacerbate the “canyon” effect.
Vail’s zoning standards exist to protect neighborhood compatibility, creek ecology and experience, pedestrian
quality, and property values. Granting such extraordinary variances would set a troubling precedent and
diminish the experience for residents and visitors alike.
I respectfully request that the PEC deny the variance package as submitted, or require a substantially
redesigned plan that:
• Adheres to the 48’ height limit (or meaningfully steps down) and reduces overall GRFA and unit count
to within—or much closer to code.
• Restores setbacks and open space to support healthy landscaping, light, and privacy.
• Places parking below grade and improves the street frontage with an active, human-scaled design;
and
• Respects the Gore Creek corridor and adjacent residences.
Thank you for your consideration and for upholding the intent of Vail’s zoning code.
Sincerely,
Dwayne Graybill
Altus Unit B
dgraybill@comcast.net | P 916.365.3950
943
From:Ruth Sierra
To:Public Input Town Council
Cc:Kerry Wallace
Subject:Opposition to PEC25-0024, PEC25-0025, and PEC25-0026
Date:Tuesday, November 4, 2025 3:06:38 PM
Attachments:image001.png
Apollo Park VTC Letter with Exhibits.pdf
Dear Vail Town Council:
Please find the attached correspondence as part of public comment regarding the proposed
projects referenced above.
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions in this regard.
Sincerely,
Ruth Castaneda Sierra
Legal Assistant
Ruth@GoodmanWallace.com
944
1
GOODMAN AND WALLACE P.C.
Attorneys and Counselors at Law
Vail – Ph: (970) 926-4447
Fax: (970) 926-5009
105 Edwards Village Blvd., D-201
P.O. Box 1886
Edwards, Colorado 81632
www.goodmanwallace.com
Aspen – Ph: (970) 925-2050
Fax: (970) 926-5009
November 4, 2025
Vail Town Council (“Council”)
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Via email: publicinput.vailtowncouncil@vail.gov
Re: Opposition to PEC25-0024, PEC25-0025, and PEC25-0026 – Proposed
Amendments and Special Development District for the Apollo/Lunar Park Site (“Opposition
Letter”)
Dear Members of the Vail Town Council:
This Objection is filed by the Vail Mountain View Residences on Gore Creek Owners’
Association, Inc. (“VMVR”) regarding the request submitted by Lunar Vail Land Investments,
LLC (“Lunar Vail”) for a Special Development District (“SDD”) upon Tract D, Vail Village Fifth
Filing, located at 442 South Frontage Road East, within the East Frontage Road sub-area of the
Vail Village Master Plan also known as Apollo Park (“Property”) designated as PEC25-0024,
PEC25-0025, and PEC25-0026 (“Request”).
This Opposition Letter is submitted to preserve the record under Colorado Rule of Civil
Procedure 106(a)(4) thereby urging the Council to uphold the unanimous vote by the Planning and
Environmental Commission’s (“PEC”) to deny the Request.
I. Background
The Property lies between Gore Creek and the South Frontage Road, and is adjacent to the
Altus Project, VMVR Project and The Wren project, as well as the pedestrian path along Gore
Creek to Ford Park and the Betty Ford Gardens. The Property was originally developed in the early
1970’s as employee housing and later became a timeshare complex.
VMVR is the residential condominium project located directly adjacent to the west of the
Property at 434 South Frontage Road East, Vail, Colorado. VMVR is comprised of twenty-three
(23) residential units along with common areas that include an outdoor pool (“VMVR Project”).
Lunar Vail’s Request constitutes the third of such requests made by Lunar Vail in the area where
the Property is located over the past Twenty (20) years. Specifically, Lunar Vail sought variances
for the construction of the VMVR Project, which utilized all allowable Gross Residential Floor
Area GRFA for the parcel that the VMVR Project is constructed upon (“VMVR Parcel”).
945
2
Subsequently, Lunar Vail sought an SDD for the VMVR Project to construct the Altus Vail Project
which is built upon the parking garage constructed as part of the VMVR Project (“Altus Project”).
The SDD for the Altus Project was narrowly granted by the Council and was extremely
controversial at the time based upon the height and density of the Altus Project and recognition
that Lunar Vail had created its need for the SDD by having maxed out density with the VMVR
Project.
Lunar Vail now comes back for another bite at the apple, seeking an even greater set of
variances and exceptions to the Code which override any semblance of consistency with the Town
of Vail Master Plan. Lunar Vail purports to use its previous requests for variances and an SDD to
construct the VMVR and Altus Projects as the basis for supporting yet another deviation from the
Master Plan. Not only is such positioning contrary to application of the Plan and Code, but it also
fails to address the significant differences between the Request and the Altus and VMVR Projects.
Specifically, the Request seeks substantially more height, density, and massing exceptions than
were permitted in the VMVR and Altus Projects (See Letter Submission from Howard Willard
that outlines the differences between the Altus and VMVR Projects and the Request attached
as Exhibit “A”). As a result, the comparison is apples to oranges.
The primary thrust of the Request is the amendment of Vail Village Master Plan’s
Conceptual Building Height Plan to allow for building heights of five to six stories across the
Property, which is currently limited to four stories. The Request further seeks SDD and
Conditional Use Permits (“CUP”) to accommodate an oversized structure inconsistent with
surrounding development and which would loom over Gore Creek and the pedestrian pathway due
to a lack of stepping down of the project in height or density as it approaches the creek. The
Request covers approximately 106,521 sq. Ft. of GRFA and includes: 36 timeshare units, 32
dwelling units, 6 attached accommodation units, and 8 employee housing units.
The proposed Request was initially reviewed by the PEC on September 8, 2025, and had a
follow-up review on September 22, 2025. At the October 13, 2025, meeting, the PEC formally
denied all the following items in the Request while continuing review of The Conditional Use
Permit Amendment to a later time (PEC25-0024); (1) The Vail Village Master Plan Height
Amendment (PEC25-0025); and (2) The Special Development District Proposal (PEC25-0026).
The PEC’s findings consistently emphasized that the proposals were inconsistent with the adopted
Vail Village Master Plan and comprehensive plan objectives, exceeded intended building height
and site coverage limits, particularly in view-sensitive areas, and did not maintain compatibility
with surrounding pedestrian-scale character along Gore Creek.
II. Conformity with Vail Village Master Plan
Under Section 3-2-6A of the Vail Town Code, amendments to the Master Plan must be
consistent with the Town’s Comprehensive Plan and must further the goals, objectives, and
policies that promote coordinated and harmonious development. The Plan’s Land Use Plan states
that: “Maintaining the general pattern of existing land uses is a stated goal for Vail Village.
While some changes in land use are indicated by this Plan, they respect the existing character
that has been established throughout the Village.”
Plan Goal #1 also states: “Encourage high quality, redevelopment while preserving
unique architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity.”
Building heights greatly influence the character of the built environment in the Village. This is
946
3
particularly true near Gore Creek where typical building heights of three to four stories establish
a pleasing human scale.
The proposed height and density would dramatically change the character of the area and
adversely impact surrounding properties due to the introduction of a building that exceeds the
48-foot limit by 22 feet and which does not step down toward Gore Creek, thus creating large
mass directly adjacent to the VMVR Project. The proposed building scale does not respect the
character of the area and is not in scale with the East Frontage Road Sub-Area. The Plan’s
Action Plan establishes the following policies relative to the East Frontage Road Sub-Area #9-1,
Parking Lot Infill:
• Height of building to be limited so as to not impede view corridors from the frontage road
(and Interstate 70) to the Village and Vail Mountain.
• Mass of buildings to step back from the Frontage Road to prevent sun/shade impacts on
the road. Satisfying parking demand on site will necessitate structured parking.
• A substantial landscape buffer shall be provided between any new development and the
Frontage Road without jeopardizing future frontage road improvements.
The requested additional height and density will impede views from the frontage road and I-
70 to Vail Mountain and cause sun-shade impacts to the Frontage Road and the VMVR pool
area. Vail Land Use Plan policies emphasize maintaining lower-scale structures near Gore Creek,
preserving view corridors, and avoiding overmass adjacent to pedestrian pathways. The Vail
Strategic Action Plan further directs that development preserve the town’s mountain character
and protect scenic quality.
a. The Vail Land Use Plan:
The Vail Land Use Plan, an element of the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan, updated
January 28, 2009, Section 4 Growth Issues states "the land-use plan was intended to help address
the following growth related questions identified by the task force: (C) Location Growth, ‘should
growth be accommodated through among other things growth in existing multifamily developed
areas and/or (D) should growth occur primarily in townhomes and single-family/duplex
residences or balance in all sectors.”
Section 5.3 Page 40 (D) Rezoning states "Where conflicts arise between existing zoning
and proposed land-use categories (and changes have not been made in the development of the
implementation measures described herein) existing zoning shall control. It will be the
responsibility of the applicant to clearly demonstrate how conditions have changed since the plan
was adopted."
Section 5.3 of the Land Use Plan states "Affordable employee housing should be made
available through private efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail,
with appropriate restrictions.” The fact that the oversized proposed Lunar Park project would
provide eight (8) employee housing units is insufficient to support the Request which amounts to
inappropriate and unlawful spot zoning as well as a failure to follow the Town of Vail's internal
guiding documents.
b. Vail Strategic Action Plan:
947
4
This Request would create a new SDD zoning overlay (“Lunar Park SDD”) to redevelop
the Apollo Park site with two new multi-family buildings, mixed ownership and accommodation
units, and associated parking and landscaping. Pursuant to the Vail Strategic Action Plan adopted
by the Vail Town Council November 6, 2007, the summary on page 2 states “The Town actively
seeks input and cooperation from the community and its neighbors to ensure fulfillment of its
vision." The Vail Strategic Action Plan objectives include "ensuring fairness and consistency in
the development review process." The Request fails to meet these standards.
III. Violations of Town Code
a. PEC25-0024 – Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”)
This Request seeks to amend the existing CUP to allow continued and expanded timeshare
accommodation use as part of the larger Lunar Park redevelopment. Under Vail Town Code § 12-
16-7(B), a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate compatibility with surrounding uses,
conformance to the Master Plan, and the absence of adverse environmental impacts. The PEC
(Staff Report, pp. 4–7) found that the project fails to meet these standards due to excessive
massing, inadequate setbacks (6 feet where 20 feet are required), and height inconsistent with
the neighborhood character. These findings are supported by the Vail Village Urban Design Guide
§ 2.6.4, which requires preservation of pedestrian scale and building transitions. The CUP request
also fails Objective 3.1 and Policy 9-1 of the Master Plan, which emphasize compatibility and
protection of scenic views.
b. PEC25-0025 – Conceptual Building Height Amendment
The Request seeks to amend the Vail Village Master Plan Building Height Map to increase
allowable heights from 48 ft (4 stories) to 63–70 ft (5–6 stories). This conflicts directly with Vail
Town Code § 3-2-6(A), which requires amendments to be consistent with the comprehensive plan
and to promote harmonious development. The proposal also conflicts with the Vail Village Master
Plan’s Building Height Profile, which establishes a transitional pattern from five-to-six-story
buildings along the Frontage Road to four-story buildings near Gore Creek. The PEC found (Staff
Memo, pp. 6–8) that the proposed height of 70 feet along South Frontage Road and 63 feet along
Gore Creek exceeds the established 48-foot limit by 46% and 31%, respectively. The Vail Village
Master Plan (pp. 22, 55) requires step-down transitions toward Gore Creek to preserve view
corridors and pedestrian scale—policies further reinforced in Objectives 3.4 and 3.4.1.
The PEC staff findings explicitly note that the proposed amendment would disrupt this
hierarchy and negatively impact public view corridors and pedestrian scale. The proposed increase
would violate Objective 3.4 of the Master Plan by encroaching upon public stream access and the
natural corridor of Gore Creek. The proposal therefore violates both the quantitative height
restrictions and the qualitative intent of the adopted plan.
c. PEC25-0026 – Special Development District (SDD)
Vail Town Code § 12-9-2(A)(2) mandates that a Special Development District conforms
to the Comprehensive Plan and preserves community character. The proposed SDD is required to
meet the following Design Criteria:
948
5
Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment,
neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk,
building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation.
Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and
workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
Compatibility and relationship are based on several factors including but not limited to
density, building height, scale and mass, land use and impacts. Instead, the proposed SDD seeks
variances far exceeding the High-Density Multi-Family (HDMF) zoning parameters: site
coverage of 60% (+9% over limit), landscaping coverage of 24% (–20% deficiency), dwelling
unit density of 55 DU/acre (+120% over limit), and GRFA of 106,521 square feet (+163%
above the 40,434-sf limit). Height variances of 70 feet and 63 feet (46% and 31% overage,
respectively) and a reduced west side setback of 6 feet (-70% deficiency) compounds the
inconsistency (See Variance Table attached as Exhibit “B”).
IV. Legal Principles
d. Spot Zoning
The Request constitutes unlawful “spot zoning.” Colorado Courts have long condemned
'spot zoning'—singling out a parcel for treatment inconsistent with surrounding uses without
justification in the comprehensive plan. The definition of “spot zoning” describes an amendment
to zoning which reclassifies a small parcel in a manner inconsistent with existing zoning patterns,
for the benefit of the owner and to the detriment of the community or without any substantial
public purpose. King’s Mill Homeowners Association v. Westminster, 77 P.2d 1186, 1191 (Colo.
1976). "[I]n determining whether spot zoning is involved, the test is whether the change in question
was made for the purpose of furthering a comprehensive zoning plan or design merely to relieve a
particular property from the restrictions of the zoning regulations." Id.; see also Clark v. City of
Boulder, 362 P.2d 160, 162 (Colo. 1961).The Request constitutes a design to relieve the Property
from the restrictions of the zoning regulations and benefits Lunar Vail to the detriment of the
community and is devoid of public purpose.
Another zoning case before the Colorado Supreme Court, Nopro Co. v. Cherry Hills
Village, 504 P.2d 344 (Colo. 1972), involved the purchase of property in the center of the village
with R1 zoning. The Supreme Court in Nopro stated zoning regulations are "designed to lessen
congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; to promote health and
general welfare; to provide light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue
concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewage,
schools, parks and other public requirements. Such regulation shall be made with reasonable
consideration, among other things as to the character of the district and its particular suitability for
particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate. That relationship be made with reasonable consideration, among other things, as to
the character of the district in its particular suitability for particular uses…".
The Court specifically held "the validity of zoning regulations has never been determined
by the highest and best use concept or in terms of dollars and cents profitability." Id., at 349.
949
6
A more recent case is Whitelaw v. Denver City Council, 405 P.3d 433 (Colo. App. 2017)
in which the Colorado Court of Appeals stated, "Spot zoning creates a small island of property
with restrictions on its use different from those imposed on the surrounding property." Id at 45. In
Whitelaw, the Court reaffirmed that zoning actions inconsistent with adopted plans constitute
impermissible spot zoning.
b. Misapplication of Infill Principles
Moreover, Lunar Vail’s reliance on the concept of 'infill development' is misplaced. The
Vail Land Use Plan Section 3.2 states, ““Infill or redevelopment should reinforce the established
character of existing neighborhoods. New development should be compatible in scale, mass, and
design with adjacent properties and should avoid creating disproportionate building mass
or height relationships.” [emphasis added]. To the east, the Wren property has an approximate
height of forty (40) feet from the lowest level to the ridge of the building, based on the
condominium map for the building. To the West, the VMVR was also developed under the HDMF
zone district and has a maximum measured height of forty-eight (48) feet. The Apollo Park
Timeshare building has a height measurement of sixty-three and a half (63.5) feet, and the Lunar
Park South building has a height measurement of sixty-three (63) feet. The bulk and mass of the
proposed Request, in comparison with adjacent properties, is significantly larger than the buildings
on either side. The proposed massive six-story structures along the creek edge violate these
standards by introducing incompatible height transitions and blocking key public views. As such,
since the request is not compatible in scale, mass, or design, it will greatly disrupt the flow of the
area as well as creating sun/shade issues that will impact the frontage road and the use of VMVR’s
pool area.
c. Approval of the Request Would Constitute an Abuse of Discretion
“A governmental body abuses its discretion if it misapplies or misconstrues the governing
law, or if its decision is not reasonably supported by competent evidence in the record.” Whitelaw
III v. Denver City Council, 405 P.3d 433, 438–39 (Colo. App. 2017). Approvals or rezonings
inconsistent with adopted plans or lacking evidentiary support are often deemed arbitrary or
capricious.
V. Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, the Town Council should adopt the PEC’s recommendations for
denial of PEC25‑0024, PEC25‑0025, and PEC25‑0026. The PEC’s recommendations of denial are
fully supported by the Vail Town Code, the Vail Village Master Plan, and Colorado case law.
Approval of any portion of the Request would constitute an arbitrary, capricious, and unlawful
deviation from the Town’s adopted planning framework. Upholding that recommendation will
preserve the integrity of Vail’s planning framework.
Very truly yours,
GOODMAN AND WALLACE P.C.
Kerry H. Wallace
Kerry H. Wallace
950
EXHIBIT A 951
EXHIBIT A 952
EXHIBIT A 953
EXHIBIT A 954
Summary of Variances Requested for the Apollo/Lunar Park Site PEC 25-0024 /
0025 / 0026)
Variance
Type
Application
No.
HDMF
Limit /
Requirement
Developer
Proposal
Variance
Amount
Applicable Vail
Town Code / Plan
Provision
Site
Coverage
PEC25-
0026
55% max
coverage
60%
proposed
+9% over
limit
VTC §12-9-
2(A)(2); Master
Plan Objective
3.1
Landscaping PEC25-
0026
≥30%
required
24%
proposed
–20%
deficiency
VTC §12-9-
2(A)(2)(c); Land
Use Plan
Objective 2.6
Dwelling
Units per
Acre
PEC25-
0026
25 DU/acre 55 DU/acre +120% over
limit
VTC §12-9-
2(A)(3); Master
Plan §3.3
Gross
Residential
Floor Area
PEC25-
0026
40,434 sf
limit
106,521 sf
proposed
+163% over
limit
VTC §12-9-
2(A)(1); Master
Plan Objective
3.4.1
Height –
Frontage
Road
PEC25-
0025
48 ft max 70 ft
proposed
+46% over
limit
VTC §3-2-
6(A)(2); Master
Plan p.22
Height –
Gore Creek
PEC25-
0025
48 ft max 63 ft
proposed
+31% over
limit
VTC §3-2-
6(A)(1); Master
Plan Objective
3.4
West Side
Setback
PEC25-
0024
20 ft
minimum
6 ft
proposed
–70%
deficiency
VTC §12-16-
7(B)(1); Urban
Design Guide
§2.6.4
Each requested variance substantially exceeds the dimensional and qualitative standards
of the Vail Town Code and adopted Master Plans. Approval would constitute a departure
from established planning policy unsupported by competent evidence, contrary to the
Town Code and adopted plans.
EXHIBIT B 955
From:Steve Shaver
To:Public Input Town Council
Subject:Lunar Vail/Apollo Park proposed redevelopment
Date:Tuesday, November 4, 2025 8:24:46 PM
Greetings,
My name is Steve Shaver. I am an Apollo Park board member. My family has been coming
to Apollo Park since 1981 If you add up all the weeks we’ve spent here, I’ve been a resident of
Vail for about a year and a half. That compressed time frame has encompassed a lot of
change but not very much at Apollo Park. It has remained a haven from which to enjoy all the
best of Colorado; but now, the buildings are aging, the neighborhood evolving, the land lease
drawing down... change will come like it or not. There are many Apollo Park owners who want
the opportunities of Apollo Park to remain for themselves and for family members to follow
but I believe that is only likely to happen if we are proactive in responding to the realities we
confront. At the current time, we are fortunate to work with a property owner and developer
who considers the homeowners of Apollo Park as partners in this project rather than obstacles
to development. Through further partnership with the Town we have addressed issues of
community concern and have a plan that is good for Apollo owners, the Lunar Vail company,
and the community of Vail. I urge you to approve this project. The plan and the time are right.
Thank you,
Steve Shaver
Fairview Family Mediation and Forensic Services
Steven M. Shaver, Ph.D.
P.O. Box 146 phone: 303.882.4329
Parlin, CO 81239
i
“Everything will be ok in the end… if it’s not ok, it’s not the end…”
956
PRESENTATION BY
Greg Roy, AICP
Planner
PEC25-0026
Establishment of
New SDD
442 S Frontage Rd E
957
Vicinity Map
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026| vailgov.com 958
Application
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
PEC25-0026 – Establishment of new
Special Development District
-10/13/2025 Planning and Environmental
Commission
- Recommended Denial
-11/4/25 Town Council Meeting
- Application did not meet criteria
and needed to be changed
-1/6/26 Town Council Meeting (Today)
959
Background
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
•1965
•Original plat for Vail Village Fifth Filing was
recorded
•Early1970s
•Apollo Park developed as Employee Housing
•1978
•Condominium map for Apollo Park recorded
•2006
•Tract D split to create Mountain View and
Altus lot
960
Existing Conditions
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
Site Area: 56,347 SF
Buildable Area: 53,203 SF
Zoning: High Density
Multiple-Family
Geohazards: N/A
Existing Unit Count: 40
Timeshare Units
961
Adjacent Buildings – The Wren
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 962
Adjacent Buildings – Mountain View Residences
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 963
Proposed Site Plan
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 964
Site Plan - Changes
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 965
Site Plan - Changes
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 966
Site Plan - Changes
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 967
Building Section
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 968
Building Section
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 969
Building Height
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 69’
56’69’
970
Building Height
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
56’
971
Landscape Plan
Town of Vail | PEC25-0024,0025,0026 | vailgov.com 972
Landscape Plan
Town of Vail | PEC25-0024,0025,0026 | vailgov.com 973
Development Standards
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
Standard Allowed/required Proposed Complies
Site Area 10,000 SF Min 56,347 SF Complies
Setbacks 20 Ft All Sides
Front: 20’
Side (East): 20’
Side (West): 6’ subgrade
Rear: 20’
Deviation requested sub-
grade on West side
setback
Height 48 Ft 69.8 Ft Deviation Requested
Density (onsite)25 Units/Acre: 31 Units 68 Units Deviation Requested
GRFA 76 SF/100 Buildable:
40,434 SF 106,521 SF Deviation Requested
Site Coverage 55%: 30,991 SF 34,065 or 60%Deviation Requested
Landscaping 30%: 16,890 SF 16,245 SF or 28.8%Deviation Requested
Onsite Parking 122 Spaces & 75% within
the building
117 Spaces & 100% within
the building Deviation Requested
974
Development Standards - Changes
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
Standard Allowed/required Proposed Complies
Site Area 10,000 SF Min 56,347 SF Complies
Setbacks 20 Ft All Sides
Front: 20’
Side (East): 20’
Side (West): 6’ subgrade
Rear: 20’
Deviation requested sub-
grade on West side
setback
Height 48 Ft 69.8 Ft Deviation Requested
Density (onsite)25 Units/Acre: 31 Units 66 Units - 2 Units (212% of
allowable)
GRFA 76 SF/100 Buildable:
40,434 SF 95,097 SF -10,099 SF (235% of
allowable)
Site Coverage 55%: 30,991 SF 34,065 or 60%-278 SF (109% of
allowable)
Landscaping 30%: 16,890 SF 16,981 SF or 30%Complies
Onsite Parking 123 Spaces & 75% within
the building
116 Spaces & 100% within
the building Deviation Requested
975
Changes from 11/4/25
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
•Converted two Dwelling Units to EHUs
•Added an EHU to bring the total to 11 onsite
•Reduced GRFA by 9% (10,099 SF)
•Reduced Site Coverage by <1% (278 SF)
•Reduced the ridge height of the South Building by
2.5 feet
•Increased landscaping by 5% (736 SF)
•Revised the floor plan to relocate the Timeshare
units below the Dwelling Units in the south building
976
Changes from 11/4/25
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
•Converted two Dwelling Units to EHUs
•Added an EHU to bring the total to 11 onsite
•Reduced GRFA by 9% (10,099 SF)
•Reduced Site Coverage by <1% (278 SF)
•Reduced the ridge height of the South Building by
2.5 feet
•Increased landscaping by 5% (736 SF)
•Revised the floor plan to relocate the Timeshare
units below the Dwelling Units in the south building
977
Floor Plan Comparison
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 978
Floor Plan Comparison
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 979
Changes from 11/4/25
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
•Converted two Dwelling Units to EHUs
•Added an EHU to bring the total to 11 onsite
•Reduced GRFA by 9% (10,099 SF)
•Reduced Site Coverage by <1% (278 SF)
•Reduced the ridge height of the South Building by
2.5 feet
•Increased landscaping by 5% (736 SF)
•Revised the floor plan to relocate the Timeshare
units below the Dwelling Units in the south building
980
Changes from 11/4/25
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
•Converted two Dwelling Units to EHUs
•Added an EHU to bring the total to 11 onsite
•Reduced GRFA by 9% (10,099 SF)
•Reduced Site Coverage by <1% (278 SF)
•Reduced the ridge height of the South Building by
2.5 feet
•Increased landscaping by 5% (736 SF)
•Revised the floor plan to relocate the Timeshare
units below the Dwelling Units in the south building
981
Elevation
Town of Vail | PEC25-0024,0025,0026 | vailgov.com
8950’8947’6”
982
Changes from 11/4/25
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
•Converted two Dwelling Units to EHUs
•Added an EHU to bring the total to 11 onsite
•Reduced GRFA by 9% (10,099 SF)
•Reduced Site Coverage by <1% (278 SF)
•Reduced the ridge height of the South Building by
2.5 feet
•Increased landscaping by 5% (736 SF)
•Revised the floor plan to relocate the Timeshare
units below the Dwelling Units in the south building
983
Elevation - Previous
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 984
Elevation - Revised
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 985
VVMP - Conceptual Building Height Plan
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 986
Conceptual Building Height Plan
Town of Vail | PEC25-0024,0025,0026 | vailgov.com 987
Building Height Plan
Town of Vail | PEC25-0025 | vailgov.com 988
VVMP - Conceptual Building Height Plan
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com 989
Resolution No 52
Town of Vail | PEC25-0025 | vailgov.com
At the October 13, 2025
PEC Forwarded a
Recommendation of
Denial with a unanimous
vote of 5-0
At the November 4, 2025
Town Council Denied
Resolution No. 52, Series
of 2025 with a vote of 6-1
990
Elevation - Revised
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
18’6”
18’
991
Criteria for Approval
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
1.Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent
properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual
integrity and orientation.
2.Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with
surrounding uses and activity.
3.Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title.
4.Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and
urban design plans.
5.Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the
property on which the special development district is proposed.
6.Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a
functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of
the community.
7.Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic
circulation
8.Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural
features, recreation, views and function.
9.Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship
throughout the development of the special development district.
992
Criteria for Approval
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
1.Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent
properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual
integrity and orientation.
2.Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with
surrounding uses and activity.
3.Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title.
4.Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and
urban design plans.
5.Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the
property on which the special development district is proposed.
6.Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a
functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of
the community.
7.Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic
circulation
8.Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural
features, recreation, views and function.
9.Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship
throughout the development of the special development district.
993
PEC Recommendation
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
At the October 13, 2025 PEC Forwarded a
Recommendation of Denial with a unanimous vote of 5-0
Recommended Motion:
“The Town Council denies, on first reading, Ordinance No.
28, Series of 2025, an ordinance approving establishment
of a new special development district No. 44, Lunar Park,
and specifically to approve the development plan to allow
for the development of a multi-family development, located
at 442 South Frontage Road East and approving the
associated development agreement. (PEC25-0026).”
994
Public Benefit
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
12-9A-9:
“…Before the Town Council approves development
standards that deviate from the underlying zone
district, it should be determined that such
deviation provides benefits to the town that
outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation.
This determination is to be made based on
evaluation of the proposed Special Development
District’s compliance with the design criteria
outlined in § 12-9A-8 of this article.”
995
Public Benefit
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
•Fee in lieu for 985 SF of Inclusionary Zoning, equaling
$665,624
•Reduced from 1,374 square feet of Inclusionary Zoning,
equaling a fee of $928,494.24
•Eleven on-site employee housing units totaling 10,775 SF
(6,720 SF required)
•Increased from eight units and (6,488 SF)
•$125,000 for the Gore Creek Stream Tract Fund
•Implementation of a Short Term Rental program
•Replacing the Apollo Park units
•Paying the Traffic Impact fee (required)
•Granting an easement for emergency vehicle ingress and
egress and pedestrian access for the adjacent Wren property
•Installation of landscaping along South Frontage Rd
•Removal of encroachments on Stream Tract
•Installation of snowmelted sidewalk along South Frontage Rd
•100% of parking located within a building (75% required)
•Public art in the amount of $200,000
996
Public Benefit - Altus
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
•42.7% of the project were Employee Housing
Units (15 units)
•Land donation to the Town of almost 900 SF
•Short term rental program for the
development
•Paved access path and stairs through the
property for the benefit of the general
community to access the Gore Creek Path
•Reconstructing and heating the path in front of
the development and across the neighboring
property to the street corner
•Pursuing Green Globe Certification for the
building
•Public art in the amount up to $50,000
997
Deviation Comparison
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
Standard Allowed/Required HDMF Mountain View Altus Lunar/Apollo
Site Area Min: 10,000 SF 56,410 SF 56,437 SF
Setbacks Front - 20' Side - 20' Rear- 20'Front - 20' Side (W) 20' Side (E) - 15' Rear -
20'
Front - 20' Side (W)
6' Side (E) - 20' Rear -
20'
Height Flat or Mansard Roof - 45'
Sloping Roof 48'Sloping Roof - 48'Sloping Roof - 70 Ft Sloping Roof 69.8
Density (Units)25 Dus/Buildable Acre 38 DUs or 29.3/acre or 117% of allowable
66 DUs or 54
DUs/acre or 212% of
allowable
Density (GRFA)Max: 76SF/100SF of Buildable
Site Area or
75,280 or 170% of Allowable GRFA
(42,872)
95,097 or 235% of
Allowable GRFA
(42,892)
Site Coverage Max: 55%48%60%
Landscaping Min: 30% of total site area 40%30%
998
PEC Recommendation
Town of Vail | PEC25-0026 | vailgov.com
At the October 13, 2025 PEC Forwarded a
Recommendation of Denial with a unanimous vote of 5-0
Recommended Motion:
“The Town Council denies, on first reading, Ordinance No.
28, Series of 2025, an ordinance approving establishment
of a new special development district No. 44, Lunar Park,
and specifically to approve the development plan to allow
for the development of a multi-family development, located
at 442 South Frontage Road East and approving the
associated development agreement. (PEC25-0026).”
999
Thank you
1000
10
0
1
10
0
2
10
0
3
10
0
4
10
0
5
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening
attachments. When in doubt, contact Vail IT Department
From:HOWARD WILLARD
To:Stephanie Kauffman
Cc:George Ruther
Subject:Written Comment for Apollo Park SDD Topic at 01/06/26 Vail Town Council Meeting
Date:Tuesday, January 6, 2026 7:37:38 AM
Attachments:Apollo Park SDD #44 Comparison.pdf
I am writing on behalf of the Vail Mountain View Residences Homeowners
Association Board of Directors. Our Board has been deeply involved in
the Planning and Environmental Commission Meetings and the Vail Town
Council Meeting considering the creation of a Special Development
District #44 to enable the Apollo Park Redevelopment to significantly
exceed existing Vail Zoning limits. The zoning variances that they are
requesting are record setting variances within our East Vail Neighborhood.
The only other SDD in our East Vail neighborhood was SDD #42 which
enabled the development of Altus. The average variance requested in
SDD #42 was 33% compared to the latest proposal for the Apollo Park
redevelopment which is seeking an average variance of 75% (See
attached analysis).
We have been engaged with the development team for Apollo Park since
April 2025 and after months of disagreement we appear to be very close
to executing an agreement that would allow us to support a revised
proposal. However, given that we only made real progress toward a
mutually acceptable compromise in the past few days, we need a bit more
time to confirm the terms of our compromise and turn those terms into a
legally enforceable agreement. We ask that the Vail Town Council defer
the Apollo Park SDD agenda item until the next Vail Town Council
Meeting on 01/20/26.
Given the significant neighborhood opposition to the prior Apollo Park
Redevelopment proposals, the recommendation of denial by the PEC and
the average variance requested for SDD #44 of 75% we believe that a
delay of 2 weeks to attempt to improve the current proposal and create
greater neighbor support is a worthwhile time investment.
I have copied George Ruther on this email with the hope that he is
similarly optimistic about our ability to reach a compromise agreement and
will join me in asking for a delay until the next Vail Town Council Meeting.
Many thanks for your consideration.
Sincerely,
VMVR HOA Board of Directors (Chris Sublette, Caryn Clayman, Lisa
1064
Widmier and Laura Willard)
Sent from my iPad
1065
1066
Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening
attachments. When in doubt, contact Vail IT Department
From:Shawn Byrne
To:Greg Roy; Stephanie Kauffman; Russell Forrest
Cc:Matt Gennett; George Ruther
Subject:TOV 1/6/26 Council meeting - Lunar Park neighbor letter
Date:Tuesday, January 6, 2026 11:59:58 AM
Attachments:Lunar Park_Wilcox_TOV260106.pdf
Good morning all,
I am sharing the attached letter from John Wilcox, an owner in the Tyrolean, pertaining to the
Lunar Park / Apollo Park application for SDD No. 44 for today’s 1/6 Town Council meeting.
We ask that you please share with the Town Council in advance of today’s meeting.
Thank you.
All the best,
Shawn
Shawn Byrne
Lunar Vail Land Investments, LLC
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review,
copy, or distribute this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete the original message.
1067
10
6
8