HomeMy WebLinkAboutCheckPoint Charlie File Notes 2009Hello Charley,
I apologize this has taken me a few days to respond to, but I wanted to make sure I understood
your requests thoroughly prior to sending a response. .
Charley Viola's Original Concerns listed in e-mail correspondence on September 28, 2009:
1. Agreement that can be recorded that states that no change to our garage access will be
made without our approval.
2. Agreement that we are not liable for any expenses related to parking lot maintenance or
upkeep.
3. Ability to add a sign directing to the LACA garage.
4. Agreement that no vehicles will be parked in the new access to the LACA garage. I view
this as important as the valets may be tempted to park cars in this lane when they are
busy.
The Chalets at the Lodge at Vail, LLC.:
1. Based on the approved plan the modifications agreed to with the ToV do not affect the
access or parking for LACA. Please reference the attached and previously provided
turning radiuses that clearly show that access has been maintained.
2. The Chalets at the Lodge at Vail, LLC is facilitating the changes for the ToV and as you
are aware do not manage the property. We suggest that you discuss any concerns you
have about operational issues with the appropriate association /property management
group.
3. The revisions to the planting bed, entryway, and road occur on Town of Vail Right of
Way, so any proposed signage in those areas we will need to submitted to the ToV for
approval. Any signage or way finding info in the other areas should be coordinated with
the property management group. If you can let me know exactly what you would like and
where you would like it located, I am happy to present this to ToV to get the ball rolling.
4. Similar to Item # 2, The Chalets at the Lodge at Vail, LLC. does not control the operations
of the L @V Parking Lot, so please direct this request to the appropriate parties.
Thanks for cooperation in making this project a beneficial update to the core of Vail Village.
Cody O'Kelly
Senior PM
The Chalets at the Lodge at Vail, LLC.
October 5, 2009
Ck C_C1/_?0t"T-P
�. I
O
LU
ro
PROPOSED CHECKPOINT -ONE UNISEX PUBLIC RESTROOM
CHARLIE 4" SCHED 40 I - GAS SERVICE
- DRB APPROVAL
SANITARY SERVICE.
d I .
PROPOSED SEWER /
CLEANOU
=XISTING 6" DIP — '
PROPOSED CPC GAS '
SERVICE AND GAS METER
WITH BOLLARDS;.;:..
LAN,
STING; CABLE c
V docA��
TV. 2 -2 " —� I
DUITS
;AS MAIN
5' AWAY
ROPOSED
CHARLIE
3UILDING. /
i
r j_ aK --
/.! P`
li e {{
i EXISTING
CHECKPi
J / �� �• - CHARLIE
EXISTING BUIi
DING-
0
�� 1
.�(`,1� SERVI
v'( /EXISTING TOV I EXISTI
UTIIIT VAU
Rl
ONTINUE TOV JOINT
TRENCH AND SNOWMELT
MAINS FROM EXISTING END.
SEE DETAIL C/2.1
INSTALL PROPOSED UTILITIES TO
wi
Q c BE COMPATIBLE WITH TOP OF
Q PROPOSED STORM SEWER. EXISTIN(_
/ APPROX BOTTOM OF PROPOSED TRANSF_
UTILITIES = 8160.30
PROPOSED TOV
STREET LIGHT.
r, -,,,, SCALE: 1" = 10'
t kj;
h
xooa a sa'11Vn
o
r
Lq-
Troy -CSL Lighting Inc.:: Wall/ Carlton / BCD68410B / 2 -60W Cand Base/ 8.5 "W 15.5... Page 1 of 1
Collection
Carlton
Item No.
BCD68410B <M>
Dimension
8.5 "W 15.5 "H 4 "P 10.5 "TCD
Lamping
2 -60W Cand Base
Glassware
CD (Clear Seeded)
Metalwork
Solid Brass
Finishes
OB (Oil Rubbed Bronze)
http: / /www. troy- lighting.conVcontentslviewItem_ printer .asp ?idProduct =29 &idcategory= 9/24/2009
14625 East Clark Ave., City of Industry, CA 91745 USA Phone: 626 - 336 -4511 www.Troy- Ughting.com
MCI.
P 5
G) c
z
---I -,
M r
m r
--j r
x c
M c
M
cn
_
0
0
M
m r
n
,0
0
rn I
--q -I
> ;I
c
r
O
2f 1
2
c
N
Of,
IMI.-
0')
00
rn
X
cn
G)
M
z z
275 0
I x
M
M >
0 z
J/
cy.) -
CF)
0
CA X
0 - 11
c r- Z
M >
M
r
ky
z OM
M
� M M 2
I -P W N Z M
1 M M -Z, 0
O M
C-1 0 M z 0
I M
1 M 0;0:* CM/)
- n 0
cn c) ;6
, ;0 V
;0
M
o > 0
M M
0 M
co M
C > 0
21 >
>
M
cn
- V M
M M
5 X2 M
--i
x
M
rn
co G)
L7
z
r
d i
DRhN7NG !p:
--3 cn
Vail's Front Door
4
Vail Resorrs
Development Company
VAI L R ESCORTS
r - I nn? firnIT (`nPAr!l±I"
Vail's Front Door — Check Point Charlie
8.26.09
Agenda Items:
1. Design Revisions
a. CLV pursuing alternative design layouts with AEI and VMDA
1. Road Widths: Confirm 13'6" road width is acceptable y `
2. DRB Approval
a. Discuss any additional revisions to exterior facade of the building
3. Project Fees
a. Confirm Construction Use Tax Fee is waived
b. Confi ToV understanding of DIA in regards to responsibility of Fees
ERWSD Tap Fee is currently valued at $21,000 if W meter is accepted by ERWSD and $41,000
�o% if 1" meter is mandated
4. Project Schedule
a. Impact of Design Revisions (Projected start date of 9 -21 -2009 if NTP is given by 8 -28 -2009)
b. Potential schedule extension past Thanksgiving Holiday
5. Boiler Addition
a. Costs:
1. R &H /Hyder Boiler Addition $ 94,000
2. Design Costs $ 5,000
3. Hyder Schedule Extension (ROM) $ 5,000
4. Winter Conditions (ROM) $ 2,500
5. Contingency (ROM) 15,000
TOTAL $121,500
�O�
I
n
p
A A A A A A A A O 0 0 0 O
ao�ossg000000s��o$o���s$�oog$�
o
3
�
7
w
n T T ,T j w 0 _T s N
�
0
m
m
A
al
�
=
g
It
=
O
+ o 0 0
+ 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 + + b+ O I O t0 N .
O
A
0 pp ' o
N " a m w N O V W A OOO Oo
m O N N
CO
3
p+ pp o oo OO oo oo op p
00 t0
b b� b b b m b b 1 1 b 0 0 b 1 t b m .O m i0 t po 0
ppm 0
ppb po a
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O a a 0O ^
!C5!+
V+
O 6 O W tl+ 6 p m N U N O. 4 A t0 V W V 0 iD W+ V ++ a O O
Ot
C
.. .. .. .. .. .
.po
0 tl 10 m m 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 ro m b ro 1 1 0 0 10 tl f0 S 10 f0 !0 !p S
3
3
I ..-_....._
... ............................__.
D
V
i N
� m m
s
D
°
m
a
3
is
S m T
=
m
-- --- - - -- -- -- -••
-------------- - ----- - - - - -- R
C m `
4
O
�m -_ -
m S n
2
i m
i t m
n
n
S
z rn
$
m
..........{ .. ---- -_.._........... - ...__- -- - - ---- - .............. ..
m
9
v
'
_
.
�
x
� r
m . ----- -- -------- --- ----- ------------- - . - -- ----
c
0
♦
9
_T
N
0 =
°
A .0
o
0 3
" m.-_ ................. ............................. ..
^
N
3
3
__..._.. _... _.. ....... ...... ............ .. ... ... ..... .
E I
EXTRAORDINARY RESORTS : EXCEPTIONAL I-XPERIENCIS'"
September 10, 2009
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Attention: George Ruther
Re: Front Door Development Agreement dated July 18, 2006, between the Town of
Vail (the "Town "), and The Vail Corporation d/b /a Vail Associates, Inc. ( "Vail
Associates "), as amended (the "Development Agreement ")
Gentlemen:
This correspondence is to memorialize the commitment made by you and Tom Kassmel
during our meeting yesterday and to confirm the understanding of Vail Associates and the Town
with respect to the construction of the Check Point Charlie Facility. As you know, in order to
complete the construction of the Check Point Charlie Facility prior to Christmas, Vail Associates
need to provide its general contractor with a notice to proceed prior to September 11, 2009. We
look forward to working with you to finalize the Check Point Charlie Facility improvements as
soon as possible.
1. Approved Plans for Construction The Check Point Charlie Facility will be
constructed in accordance with the plans submitted to and approved by the Town of
Vail Design Review Board on September 2, 2009 and the Site Plans attached hereto
as Exhibit A which illustrates the agreed upon ingress and egress to the Lodge at Vail
and Check Point Charlie Facility; subject to construction limitations identified in the
process of design. One unisex ADA bathroom will be constructed in the Check Point
Charlie Facility in the location set forth on the Plans and approved by the Town
Council.
2. Utility Fees In accordance with Section 3 of the Development Agreement, the Town
will pay for necessary utilities improvements and infrastructure and utilities services,
including service charges, for the restroonl to be constructed as part of the Check
Point Charlie Facility. The tap fees alone are currently estimated to be between
$21,000 and $41,000 and will be determined by the applicable utility providers.
Boiler Addition Although not required pursuant to the Development Agreement, the
Town has requested that a boiler be installed in a full height mechanical /boiler room
below the Check Point Charlie Facility for the operation of the Town snowmelt
system. If the boiler is to be installed, the Town will be responsible for all costs and
expenses (including, without limitation, design, construction and operational costs)
associated with that boiler.
Please join in and provide your agreement and confirmation of the foregoing by the
proper execution of this letter on behalf of the Town as set forth below.
Vail Resorts ;4lanagement Cor}panN- • 970 754 2535 + %
Post Office Box 959. 137 Benchmark Road • Avon. Colorado 81620
0
This letter may be executed in counterparts, each of which will constitute an original, and
which together will constitute one and the same agreement. Either party may provide
confirmation of its execution and legal delivery of this letter by facsimile or email transmission
of a copy of its signed counterpart. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this letter will
have the meanings ascribed to them in the Development Agreement.
Very truly yours,
The Vail Corporation, d /b /a Vail Associates, Inc.
By:
Nance: sf��f1 �tia�
Title:_
AGREED AND CONFIRMED
TOWN OF VAIL, a municipal corporation
duly organized and existing by virtue of
the laws of the State of Colorado
By: � - --4 - - r
Name: Carrot :?4.x i- a, �, ,a
Title: - pi t�z-r? t vi C�>vr�. -n .� N zx v'J .lap" )'EJ'U�
Enclosure
cc: Stan Zemler, Town Manager
Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer
VAI L R ESORT
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Vail's Front Door — Check Point Charlie
8.26.09
[Updated on 8.27.2009 and revised 8.31 with additional minutes in Bold]
[Attendees: Kristen Williams, Dick Funk, Kyle Griffith, Cody O'Kelly /VRDC; George Ruther, Tom Kassmel,
Martin Haeberle, Warren Campbell, Mike McGee /ToV]
Agenda Items:
Design Revisions
a. CLV pursuing alternative design layouts with AEI and VMDA
1. Road Widths: Confirm 13'6" road width is acceptable
[ToV confirmed that building can be shifted to the West. Site plan to maintain 13' "pinch point" at SW corner of the
Checkpoint Charlie building, but maintain 14' drive lane on the East.]
2. DRB Approval
a. Discuss any additional revisions to exterior fagade of the building
[George Ruther would like building to have additional "details ", meeting scheduled to for 8.28 with
George /Cody /Mark Donaldson to review proposed revisions to building.]
Project Fees
a. Confirm Construction Use Tax Fee is waived
[George stated that VRDC should plan on paying Fee, but that he would research possibly refunding or waiving at a
later date.]
b. Confirm ToV understanding of DIA in regards to responsibility of Fees
[Tom Kassmel and Greg Hall have committed to discussing with ToV attorney.]
1. ERWSD Tap Fee is currently valued at $21,000 if W meter is accepted by ERWSD and $41,000
if 1" meter is mandated
[VRDC re- evaluating ERWSD fees and will submit AEI's calculation upon receipt.]
4. Project Schedule
a. Impact of Design Revisions (Projected start date of 9 -21 -2009 if NTP is given by 8 -28 -2009)
b. Potential schedule extension past Thanksgiving Holiday
[ToV accepted that schedule would be extended, but wanted commitment for completion prior to Christmas. VRDC
delivered DRAFT CPM via e-mail to GR, TK, GH on 8.27]
5. Boiler Addition
a. Costs:
1. R &H /Ryder Boiler Addition $ 94,000
2. Design Costs $ 5,000
3. Hyder Schedule Extension (ROM) $ 5,000
4. Winter Conditions (ROM) $ 2,500
5. Contingency (ROM) 15,000
TOTAL $121,500
[VRDC to provide additional cost breakout so that ToV can accurately review.]
[Discussion on L @V Parking Lot took place, the majority of the conversation was focused Public Works goal of
minimizing traffic to Checkpoint Charlie and Vail Fire Department's ability to safely access L @V and SLT. Follow up
meeting on 8.31.2009 took place where alternative plans were discussed. CLV to present revised drawings to Vail Fire
and Public Works,]
(09/23/2009) George Ruther - Re Checkpoint Charlie Page 1
From: Paulbreit <paulbreit @aol.com>
To: "George Ruther' <GRuther @vailgov.com>
Date: 9/22/2009 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: Checkpoint Charlie
Thanks George ... I really appreciate all the work you have put into this, and so do the homeowners here
Have a good day!!!
Take care,
Paul
AVANTI INC.
PO Box 2631
Vail,CO 81658
(970)479 -9360 Office
(970)390 -4550 Cell
paulbreit @aol.com
buckeyecabin.net
In a message dated 09/22/09 07:53:24 Mountain Daylight Time, GRuther @vailgov.com writes:
Good Morning Paul -
Thank you for attending the on site meeting yesterday and sharing your questions and concerns about the
rebuilding of Checkpoint Charlie and the completion of the Vail Village Streetscape Project. I will continue
to work closely with the project designers to further address your concerns about the public restroom.
I spoke briefly with the Vail Police Department about the hours of operation of Checkpoint Charlie and any
ability we may have to limit the use of the public restroom to the more day -time hours (ie 8:00 am to 8:00
pm) daily. I will get back with you once I better understand the option.
On another note, as promised, I spoke with Steve Virostek, the developer of the Willows about the
possibility of making improvements to the driveway entrance at Riva Ridge North. Steve will be in town on
Thursday and agreed to look into it with his sub contractor for the brick work. I'll keep you informed.
Again, thank you for participating in the ongoing discussions
George Ruther, AICP
Director of Community Development
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81658
(970) 479 -2145 (o)
(970) 479 -2452 (f)
(970) 376 -2675 (c)
>>> Paulbreit <paulbreit @aol.com> 9/21/2009 12:06 PM >>>
(09/23/2009) George Ruther - Re: Chec kpoint Charlie Pag 2
In a message dated 09/20/09 11:18:49 Mountain Daylight Time, cogambler @mac.com writes
Hi Paul,
We should enclose the future plans of Checkpoint Charlie in the
packets that are going out to Riva Ridge owners. Are the owners in
the building north of Riva Ridge aware of this project?
You might want to send this along. I am not happy about having a
restroom outside of my unit to attract drunks late at night or anytime
for that matter. If the rebuild takes place and my unit moves to the
grassy area. I look straight into Checkpoint Charlie. Nice.
Hope all is well
Sharon
Hi Sharon ..... I think the bottom line is that it is actually facilities for the Check Point Charley staff, which
everyone I believe can understand and support. Being billed as a public restroom, and trying to slide it in
under the radar by the town, I think was a huge mistake and not thought out. Why would the entrance of a
"public" restroom face the private sector of the area ? ?? Obviously they want to make it inconspicuous.
Personally, I do not believe that the Police staff charged with security of the Town, should have to share
the restroom with the public. I think it is a simple matter of security There are already two public
restrooms within a minutes walk of Check Point Charley. I think it also creates an added traffic congestion
potential, as well as late night security issues for the properties adjacent to it. George Ruther, who we
have met with, has thus far been attentive to concerns brought up by those affected.lt is my hope that
everyone can take the time to work together so that everyone is happy with the outcome.
Take care,
Paul
Avanti Inc.
Paul Breitenwischer
970 - 479 -9360 Office
970 - 390 -4550 Cell
buckeyecabin.net
(08/20/2009) George Ruther - Check Ch arlie P age 1
From: Warren Campbell
To: Cody O'Kelly; George Ruther; S. Jarvie Worcester
Date: 8/17/2009 4:29 PM
Subject: Checkpoint Charlie
CC: Greg Hall; Leonard Sandoval; Martin Haeberle; Mike McGee; Pam Brandm...
George, Greg, and Tom,
Steve, Mike, Leonard, Martin, and myself, met with Cody to get up to speed on the timing and such for Checkpoint Charlie.
We discussed the following:
1) Cody is going to get the ADA clearance in the bathroom fixed. We mentioned the addition of a urinal and Cody
responded that it would add square footage and that it would likely not fit between all the utilities and meet ADA clearance
requirements. Is the urinal a want or a must have?
2) Cody is aware the plan does not show a janitors closet as requested as it was to tight to fit one in between the utilities.
They are hoping to add a floor sink to the proposed hose bib in the bathroom and that it will suffice for this request.
Thoughts and comments?
3) Cody mentioned that he was requested to get some preliminary information on the addition of a boiler for snow melt
south of Checkpoint Charlie. Cody has some preliminary data that it will cost between $100,000 to $125,000 based on R &H
Mechanical making some broad assumptions. They need us (the Town) to decide on this issue to heat the several
thousand square feet to the south of Checkpoint Charlie. If we decide yes it will push the schedule back and the Town will
have to find this funding. They need us (the Town) to make a decision on this?
4) Cody is inquiring as to who the contact and billing should be listed on the gas service application?
5) Cody is also curious as to whether or not the construction use tax will be waived as it is a Town project? Please confirm
that all other Town of Vail fees will be waived?
6) Cody is additionally inquiring as to the status of any DRB applications. I informed him that I thought this step was
completed and if not it would be likely we would staff approved. I informed him to proceed forward with his plans for
submitting a permit as early as the end of this week.
So Cody would like to know if he should proceed forward with submitting a building permit with some small revisions by the
end of the week as planned as well as answers to the above questions.
Regards,
Warren
Z.,
(PPMT CHAKIBNORTH 'WING TURN.dw
CO
d a
0
C)
0 -M
> r ;;u
0
0
iF Z
O 0
0
N
L4 0) go �o (D
Li �, 6 (�, 64
(A 0 L4 L�
0
>
Wo
xz
08
4.v
wr
II
u >� � �IVVV�p�
pop llllllluq � ii � �
Illllllllldllllllllllllllllll
� X
AO
>
0
OV990M \DWG\MastedCHECKPOtNT CHARLONORTH WING TURN.dw
co 0
r
� �rl
�O O N
I
y r O
O
r w
I
W al co co ( O
1 -1 , A
c� i
/ . 11
\
�. �• x
D
OV99004\DWG \Maste6CHECKPDI(4T CH9RLIE \NORTH!NING TURN.dw9 n'
17r .
i 1( /
� r ' / R s • � /
i
Itl
r
Lz,
ma
N
O
aF
" Ni el
to r i
O n
Ln
O
O
fD . a
� F
C
T S
�p O
➢ Or
N
O
o n
I
O
O
W
O
2
O
(N O OD CO
(D
x•
OOO
S
7
0 000
O
JA *�
/
Lz,
ma
N
O
aF
" Ni el
OV99004 \OWGWaster\CHECKPOINT CHARMNORTH WING TURNAwg
if
/{
NOr
O
J
0
i
a o
no
D
0
O
0
a lb
a
rD
f i'
i � '", ;�:, {
0000
c
yy v
j
xo
el"
k
1
I
- u
N
on
4 g�
4 Nm
x
I \�
/ a
,
- --
CI
xo
I
i I
I
f OHAALONORTH — WING TURN.dw
v
%
Q �
' 1
r
II
N
O
4Fm pp
�g�lll
i
r
L
v
t
o
m
xC
�j I
\,
n
C D
Z
°m = -�-
� 0
y
x �
D r
3
N
p
n
F
O O
I;f
f
O O
,•,)
O
c
;
o
00 0 0 CD
ki
-
r
II
N
O
4Fm pp
�g�lll
i
r
L
v
t
m
xC
�j I
\,
z o
n
C D
Z
°m = -�-
A �
m
y
x �
Z 7C
?.
I;f
f
r
tr
r
OV990041DWG\Mastel\CHECKPOINT CHAALIEW ORTH WING TURN.dwg
i
ti
I� ?
f li to o + (n o
N n a c O
3
D ro
7 O O
O O
I! V, -4 O O
3
i u
l�l -
ii y ` ` yy ! �,`^ \ }, . / / j Cyr
y !
\
1
3
-_- �, � "" ���:�••,, ;/ yam;;
.
- ___- -_ 1 r1 .�_ • mow /\ i �.. \ \ \\
.. \\
C
'', • / "C
N
`\ 2 -
in
9
Ii�IONIN 11I0
I
dNN�iNq Iii
o.�llllllllllllillllllllllllll � ----� —�� 'I
TOWN
FILE COPY
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970- 479 -2138
FAX 970 -479 -2452
www. vailgov.com
RE: Checkpoint Charlie Meeting
To Whom It May Concern,
September 17, 2009
You are cordially invited to attend a meeting at 12:00 pm on Monday, September 21,
2009, at the current Checkpoint Charlie location. This meeting will be held to discuss
the proposed plans, construction schedule, and the completion of the Vail Village
streetscape project on Gore Creek Drive. Please inform anyone you may be aware of
that may be interested in this topic.
Attached to this letter is a copy of the proposed site plan, floor plan, and elevations for
the proposed new Checkpoint Charlie structure. If you have any further questions
please feel free to contact me by email at gruther(c )- vailgov.com or by phone at 970 -479-
2145 (office) or 970 - 376 -2675 (cell).
Sincerely,
George Ruther, AICP
Director of Community Development
Town of Vail
Cc:
File
i�� RECYCLED PAPER
J I
I
�I 1
I
I
--
W
I
i
I I
L D
I'
1
1 O I
� Il r
i I
r
Li
i 1
I
ry
U Z w I I
H
r
p N !(
i.
f
i t
Z
I
q _j I
I It 11
1
el
w
.0 W i �. t r— .._... .,
: � I II
!'
.._-. -`-
•• \,� p� - \ '�, \ ��
� Y --
I \
1
I
XI'
b �b
Y
N
.
0
z
O
w
0
1.L
A
l
�c
Z
I—
}
LLI b
—1.
LLI =
H
}
11J
J b
LU2
0
z
O
�r
y
Z
I-
LIA b
LL1:
�r
In _
ism
I--
1 jb
J �
W:
•r
0
(08/04/2009) George Ruther - RE: Jar vie Worcester 0727.doc Page 1
From: "S. " Jarvie" Worcester" <SWorcester @vaiI resorts. com>
To: George Ruther <GRuther @vailgov.com>
Date: 7/29/2009 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: Jarvie Worcester 0727.doc
Hello George,
As a follow up to our conversation yesterday and in an effort to provide you with a response to your letter
dated 7/27/09, please find my comments below.
1. At present the setback of the building to the gas line meets the needs of the utility company,
however we will review this condition.
2. We will review the drivelane, however the drive lane dimensions and look and were directed by the
PW department and we would prefer not to change this at this stage in the game.
3. As we discussed we will look into some form of a janitors cupboard, but as you know we are very
constrained in the size of the building.
We will review the bathrooms to ensure they meet the ADA requirements.
We will include the changing table into the bathrooms.
We will add snow clips to the roof design.
7. We will hire Mark Stell (arborist) to provide a before and after report on the tree in the circle on Gore
Creek Drive.
8. We will look into the alternate option of constructing a larger crawls space for the future installation
of a boiler by the town.
9. The DIA does reference two (2) bathrooms, however at the time that the civil plans were engineered
for this portion of the project, it was determined by all parties including the town, that two bathrooms would
not fit. At that point all parties agreed that a uni -sex bathroom would be acceptable and the civil plans that
accompany the building permit and the DIA show that.
Thanks
George,
We will follow up soon with revisions and more feedback.
?►� l &R(gVITVd
4 - Su, "me-vs Lck �qc
5q O - A- 45 - 5 - D-11 C� t
Jarvie Worcester
Vail Resorts Development Company
970.496.5636(o)
Meeting Minutes
Alpine Fng. Inc.
Present Chad Sallie, TOV; Fred H., Andy S, Becky, Roby, Cindy ERWSD, Glenn Palmer AEI
CC: Tom Kassmel, TOV , S. "Jarvie" Worcester VR
From: Glenn Palmer AEI, 970 - 926- 3373ph. 970 - 926- 3390(fax)
Date: Feb 3, 2009
Re: Vail Front Door Check Point Charlie work.
The following was discussed:
1. As a minimum, ERWSD needs 5 feet clear, away from the Sewer MH lid, to allow access for the
flush truck, and not on top of any water valves (the water line was recently moved so we should
verify per Feb 4 field visit).
It appears that the building might need to move a bit towards the center of the island to move off
the MH (where the tree is located), unless the Check PT Charlie porch is deleted.
2. The existing sewer is approx 20 feet deep (very deep), so there is realistically no good location
where the new building could be placed and avoid all conflicts with possible sewer or water main
repairs. Therefore, consider providing features that would allow the building to be moved, slid or
lifted.
Possible considerations:
a. A crawl space would allow access under the structure to shut them off (if it needed to be
moved).
b. Thinner or removable /paneled rock fascia to reduce rock weight, or panels to allow it's
removal, or delete rock.
c. Having the building on a skid structure, or hooks in the top for a crane to lift.
d. Providing minimal 4 foot deep footings, that when the building was removed, the
foundations could be easily demo'd
3. ERWSD said that the building could be placed approximately as shown (move off the MH cover,
item #1), but that needed, they would remove whatever can't be lifted/pulled out of the way for
possible repair work.
4. The water meter and PRV could be in the building, or crawl space (if reasonably accessible). I
don't know if the building has a mechanical/water entry room or not.
The existing nearby irrigation meter could be "paperwork tied" to the Check Point new water
meter /account for billing purposes.
5. The sewer should connect to the sewer main ( they do not like services connecting to manholes),
and should connect to the main at the 2:00 or 10:00 position.
6. Tap Fees: ERWSD said the building would be considered a commercial application, and would
be based on the smallest (3/4" meter size tap fee rate) even though the small amount of fixtures
probably requires a smaller meter size (for which there is no tap fee given). The water service
and actual tap would be 1" minimum.
It is possible to request a variance for tap fees.
7. I checked with Holy Cross to make sure it is ok to connect to the existing (nearby) transformer
(which we assume the existing building is connected to): they are checking.
Other items:
February 4, 2009
I asked if there were any outstanding water or sewer acceptance, inspection or repair items for the
Front Door: They said that items noted last fall had all been addressed, and (now just waiting for the
formal acceptance application: the bill of sale is the last item needed, and is in process).
Glenn Palmer, PE
VailFrontDoorCheckPointCharl ieER W S D. doc
2
I \ \ \\ \\
,
F=
7 '
CAT - OAS
�\
CAS
OAS -
�
B
CHECK POINT �`9r
CHARLIE
um
\\ GR
6�
6�
6�
6�
UTILITY PULL BOX
GRATE ELEV. = 8164.3'
WATER SAMPLING STATION
GRAPHIC
0
0
�J
i
J
z �\
v w�_
X �
W (il Rk I A
> NQ- Q 1
0
F-
V I ,,
`F- z w
Q G
n Q
w 0
U
Q z
5
O
L
w
h er
0
o -
� U L.
o
a
Q U U
w
u C3
U W
U
U
G �
>
Ln �
O
�
a
O (/7 A
It 0
U
c
U
aN
U
W
U
�- X-
-
O s cc
0
- —0 �
�
V) .0
V
C a
Y �'a
U 7 t
C-
:- a
m 3 0 0
Q ` O o
0
�
Q o z
0-
W
..
�=
v
Ui
X c
o 5 c 0
N p -c
CL s 4) d N
M
z
0
0
�J
i
J
z �\
v w�_
X �
W (il Rk I A
> NQ- Q 1
0
F-
V I ,,
`F- z w
Q G
n Q
w 0
U
Q z
5
O
L
w
h er
0
o -
� U L.
o
a
Q U U
>J
o ::)
Q
>
WIZ �
z C
O -
U t F-
:D
0
F--
G ~ --J W
LLJ � Z
C /) w-
��
OOz
rzQ
3
W-40
7
1
V
1!
o F-
G J
w
O
n w
O
nn
ILL- V
a�-
�I
IN
>
ry U ��
G M
�z
O
QCy
d � ►
r W
n -7�i
w
u C3
U W
U
U
G �
>
Ln �
O
�
a
O (/7 A
It 0
U
>J
o ::)
Q
>
WIZ �
z C
O -
U t F-
:D
0
F--
G ~ --J W
LLJ � Z
C /) w-
��
OOz
rzQ
3
W-40
7
1
V
1!
o F-
G J
w
O
n w
O
nn
ILL- V
a�-
�I
IN
>
ry U ��
G M
�z
O
QCy
d � ►
r W
n -7�i
> r
U
LLI
\ w
r ) G
-', O ow
\ F - Z "UJ
� Q�
Air
!�j v
� \ J
W
Q O > U \
w
_U
}
U
U
L.
G
W
U
O
F-
C-
U
�
J
0-
W
..
> r
U
LLI
\ w
r ) G
-', O ow
\ F - Z "UJ
� Q�
Air
!�j v
� \ J
W
Q O > U \
I I LL d >
J
O
F- � I
z Q
z
Q a , ;
N .0 L
5 o
0 0
CD a
a�
LO s-
z O
(O cn N
N
C
0 ^�
a v a (L
L.
cV p o
X �O
C
cV O
N `. v 3
o
c
Q
O
0—
C
E
7
Q I
L-
O o
O
Q
O
+r
O a
C H�
V)
M
r"16 1%
0
OF
bi
T
Q1. V
r
�+- T
N
O
Y �r�
cn w ,� 0 Q >
x o
F— I—
�`_' z ,J z o W
o -� zcn—' �wz
I- w\ o I— o -j
U ::D a-
o 0 -
00 G Q
C C
\
z >
Q W o F--
a Q ~_
°
w � \ ° -J
U I—
~ O w
Q z CL w
\ o
c F- w w
t2 Cn U U
U w� U>
00 i
m U Lj
w _ V) U
Q C� O �
•', � w o� Li
+� °
a � w af LLJ t�
\ \ w IZw
Lo
En
.. `.,
a > T-
i
l o
zQ
w w
�zW
Q cn
All
d 1
U w
U w
U
LLJ
cn� 1 w
n w J .�
0 0.1 �.: < Z < o
cn