The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDRB110039Design Review Board ACTION FORM Ion Project Name: Prince Victoria Duplex Project Description: Participants: DRB Number: DRB110039 NEW PRIMARY /SECONDARY DUPLEX TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE SITE WITH EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME TO BE DEMOLISHED. OWNER PRINCE VICTORIA LLLP 02/21/2011 455 SHERMAN ST STE 468 DENVER CO 80203 APPLICANT PRINCE VICTORIA LLLP 02/21/2011 455 SHERMAN ST STE 468 DENVER CO 80203 Project Address: 616 FOREST RD VAIL Location: Legal Description: Lot: 5 Block: 1 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 6 Parcel Number: 2101 - 072 - 1100 -5 Comments: See conditions BOARD /STAFF ACTION Motion By: Gillette Action: APPROVED Second By: Kjesbo Vote: 3 -0 -0 Date of Approval: 03/16/2011 Conditions: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and /or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 (PLAN): DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval, pursuant to the Vail Town Code, Chapter 12 -3 -3: APPEALS. Cond:202 (PLAN): Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 974.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com Cond: CON0011810 The applicant shall revise the roof plan in conjunction with the Building Permit submittal to ensure all portions of the roof on the western unit comply with the maximum building height of 33 feet as defined by the Town Zoning Code. Cond: CON0011811 The applicant shall revise the site plan in conjunction with the Building Permit submittal to depict a separate heat zone for the portion of the heated driveway within the right -of -way. Cond: CON0011812 The applicant shall submit cut sheets of the exterior light fixtures in conjunction with the Building Permit to confirm they comply with Section 14 -10 -7, Outdoor Lighting, Vail Town Code. Cond: CON0011813 The applicant shall utilize gutters and downspouts which are bronze to match the color of the roof material. Cond: CON0011814 The applicant shall install three pipe snow guards which are bronze to match the roof color. Cond: CON0011815 The applicant shall revise the plans to alter the configuration of the retaining wall along the eastern property line by pulling it towards the stairs to preserve the greatest number of evergreen trees. This shall be depicted on the plans submitted in conjunction with the Building Permit. Cond: CON0011816 The applicant shall replace all evergreens removed along the eastern property line on a foot - for -foot basis, with a minimum replacement tree height of ten feet. Replacement trees shall be planted along the eastern property line and /or in the northwest corner of the site. Planner: Warren Campbell DRB Fee Paid: $650.00 Prince Victoria Duplex DRB110049 Comments of the DRB at the conceptual hearing. 1) Concerned about a mirror image appearance with regard to the windows on the upper floors in the duplex. 2) Concerned about the proposed landscaping in front of the home in terms of size and quantity. Applicable Code Sections: 14- 10 -5(L), Building Materials and Design L. Building footings and foundations shall be designed in accordance with the minimum standards of the adopted building code. Footings and foundations shall also be designed to be responsive to the natural topography of the site, and shall be designed and constructed in such a manner as to minimize the necessary amount of excavation and site disturbance. 12- 21 -12, Restrictions In Specific Zones on Excessive Slopes E. Site coverage as it pertains to this chapter, as permitted by sections 12 -6A -9, 12 -6B -9. 12 -6C -9 and 12 -6D -9 of this title, is amended as follows: 1. Not more than ten percent (10%) of the total site area may be covered by driveways and surface parking. 2. In order to protect the natural landform and vegetation on steep slopes, not more than sixty percent (60 %) of the total site area may be disturbed from present conditions by construction activities. The design review board (DRB) may approve site disturbance in excess of the sixty percent (605 maximum if specific design criteria warrant the extent of the requested deviation. If the Design Review Board chooses to approve this application staff recommends the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall revise the roof plan in conjunction with the Building Permit submittal to ensure all portions of the roof on the western unit comply with the maximum building height of 33 feet as defined by the Town Zoning Code. / ng Permit � �-t; (p �� 2) The applicant shall revise the site plan in conjunction with the Buildi submittal to depict a separate heat zone for the portion of the heated driveway within the right -of -way. Z'l,Gt� A i n �..i �f T i1C�:r�. 5rt,o w x7ert b r MA - ter A l J f SaAoe: OLo + Department of Community Development s �- 75 South Frontage Road Vail Colorado 81657 Tel: 970 -479 -2128 - Fax: 970 -479 -2452 Web: www.vailgov.com t Development Review Coordinator Application for Design Review New Construction General Information: This application is for new construction of a residential or commercial structure. Applicable Vail Town Code sections can be found at www.vailgov.corn under Vail Information - Town Code Online. All projects re- quiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department, as outlined in the submittal requirements. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and /or the Plan- ning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval expires one year from the date of approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction commences. Fee: ;650 / Single Family Duplex Multi- Family Commercial Description of the Request: lPfe-I r1 rPt7ty 1 SC GONdr914 Y •d 0 — 0 94T 4o/1S7XUe1'F h C/V S /TLr' W2771 L S771V r 6 A 7,6 RE CZ4.rH&)!j Physical Address: o / &0i9.6 Parcel Number. 2101- 072. -// - 005 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Property Owner: r Vie-7ple -14 LG L P (?!yTi9G&e Mailing Address: 'Y6.1' SN4QrrJi1 ST S //7L q48 - 6eN Vr_ G'p 8010 3 Phone: 90 l Owner's Signature: V/ Ate_ f»d �1?i9dd►tL itto�ULSICY y Primary Contact/ Owner Representative: SCOTT 7 agIy/ip.2zEb Mailing Address: P. D , 8a)( 33 BB - EAbt.� CO e9 /4 3 1 E -Mail: ,SG o 7 ' leVenz0h aye/RAY Cora Fax: ?70-32-0 For Office Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Fee Paid: (o S O. n U Meeting Date: Planner: Zoning: Auth # Check # Received From: S�oY c' Tu�K l fSE N s w1 ( C DRB No.: ( _� I c)Z� Project No: U U 1 3 Land Use: Location of the Proposal: Lot: S Block: 1 Subdivision: y4k L VI LLA !a 6 Fl Li K C D �c��uer� D FEB z 12011 TOWN OF VAIL Phone: 970 - 32-9 -39oo 01-Jan-10 MAOOLJ) c t� Scott S. Turnipseed. AIA ad pn February 21, 2011 Design Review Board Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado, 81657 Application for Final Design Review New Construction Proiect Narrative: FEB 2 12011 TOWN OF VAIL DRB Project 100639, 616 Forest Road To Whom it May Concern: The property at 616 Forest Road is currently a single family residence owned by the Prince Victoria LLLP, held by a Denver family, since 1968. The submitted drawings are for a proposed Primary/Secondary duplex to replace the existing structure. Drawings were submitted on December 27, 2010 for Conceptual Review and then subsequently approved at the DRB meeting on January 19, 2011. This is Final Review submittal for the meeting on March 09, 2011. I would like to briefly address a several deviations from the submittal requirements that you will hopefully find acceptable. The first is the requirement of a separate exterior lighting plan. Since the project has four levels with overhanging areas on upper levels obscuring levels below, I found it very difficult to convey the lighting on one plan. Instead I opted to provide the exterior lighting on each of the four level floor plans. As required any visible lighting fixtures have also been shown on the exterior elevations and cut sheets for fixtures are also included. The second issue pertains to construction of improvements within a public right -of -way. Initially there was not a need to utilize the Forest Road right -of -way but once our civil engineer met with the public works department it became necessary to construct drainage equipment within that area. The design drawings for the drainage system are included in this submittal. That being said we are now in the process of obtaining "Utility Approval and Verification', and will be applying for a "Revocable Permit to Erect or Maintain Improvements on a Public Right -of- Way ". Lastly since it took so long to get approval from the client for exterior colors, we will not have our samples complete in time for this submittal. I spoke with Warren Campbell about this and he said that provided we have samples submitted several days before the meeting it will be fine. We currently plan on having these to you on or before March 10. Hopefully I have provided you with enough information, for review of these drawings, but if you have any questions please give me a call at 970 - 328 -7044. Thanks for your time, Dave Madow c.c. Scott Turnipseed Jim Turnipseed PROPOSED MATERIALS Building Materials Tyne of Material color Notes: Please specify the manufacturer's name, the color name and number and attach a color chip. f: \cdev\fofms \permits \Pianning\DRB \DRB_New Construction 10 /3 fE7WG /N715C.LOCX/ SN/I�bL ! {/E�47NLKGd �Pe& - Roof Siding SyN7NCnC- .x721000 W eb. dW WPJ 1 AX0PJAJ Other Wall Materials es1=C .NO S S /GOGtC Fascia 'ZOLlbf,/ ,$/9wN �t/OOp CmLddr?�D BROWII/ Soffits 7 G WO0b $GOWN Al.t/.s1/NU111 GGA� Bt�GL- y Windows ,yIgSS�hEr25 Window Trim Rba&ol St9wN ,WOO GdtOl2.�d 8�i0WN EA/7JIGt/ b odVO45 ItlODA NrgTt�/Co1 L Doors ) 9e ." At y4i. e-4/td Gtl[L. GMLE Door Trim f24[lbd/ - AWN ltI00� QdLORi'1a0 �I�6Wit! Hand or Deck Rails kJx OyftfT /901-1 RAPAt ZE Flues Go %��C cor /�K Flashing S7z/ G -D 64M �L �t lta. t3�G G+CJV BltnklitJ Chimneys CD / /�iC CrtP CO / /E/q Trash Enclosures N1A N 1A Greenhouses .p2esi'd : By ULd C!X Retaining Walls f aDN7 r •' CAIV4 WI=NE VIV ifJ0 3 5'iC OUK NiN7CG�Y 1de5ez -d5 Drtxj4 s x y d,20.7vz Exterior Lighting N / n1KGEy i6YX BZ Fy4C. e0T -oP Other ' Notes: Please specify the manufacturer's name, the color name and number and attach a color chip. f: \cdev\fofms \permits \Pianning\DRB \DRB_New Construction 10 PROPOSED LANDSCAPING Botanical Name Common Name Quantity Size D -/X ?/ems ^uIJdCA!S ee4e. BL UE SPtLJCE S PROPOSED TREESPt Y�t]M/1u��1nf/�!g srrvmI"JI-r u+aMCEUrc�t,cY / 3 •• Pplsvtt/S TitG+n�OC'., 4 KI Z - AND SHRUBS y/eZ Pvv "MAArf$ WvAJr&OnMeY AMOC /A &AL �t/BE3 A-e OvA//tim .440tAff C1/x4AArr 5- d.AC . /grzsrt aromas// woods go 5 / f S &AL. SO tjCI N1# CY JAft4LW10d1Ub S I 4/ 5 &AL YA"HCW7rC1 V/1/JMvtl77& . eWCA S &Ac , sy�r tr/srt /er�woS M' T" po y/W go 5 &A t. . o Y et tw/tf q 1 "Ao%Ca 5 e ",-Y1 dN i t" L f S " ,& fG44N /aC /fW//4AA abtaCMMV - QWV1eA0 2V 5 S "AL e,v g&dS LfN /FG R /Q ®7�l/G AD�sNlOO� / "7 4.44 , CeLtrt v s xrm.*NlF --,cA /IV6AMY apbddAOD Z 7 r¢ AL . R0b4 R&A"- A m� RubrsA /tf�SE S000A641C sa 01PV14A IJXAI, O'A"& d10"A x lmiw AYxZ !/ a M4 Iu nJbOv 'A"NW AftMAF 449"J 1"WC 5/, 1C/ OCS AtltC &tj*" Y&Y'z aw PteAlaw/6 mse'04 r 3 7 ? CooA/t/S 560CIC&A MC60910C 0 0&woob EXISTING TREES L.O rv 1Q!1oCA ~01- e/4tO 7W/pj8LY'�Y �GY s' S 4L 4L . TO BE REMOVED � sienr 38 t.ESS 711iRN � of A9PL12V Minimum Requirements for Landscaping: Deciduous Trees - 2" Caliper Coniferous Trees - 6' in height Shrubs - 5 Gal. Type Square Footage GROUND COVER ' W/34—"b tSOO S.F. SOD N H77v4 &AAftES SEED IRRIGATION TYPE OF EROSION CONTROL A4-1- A /s7VA6Z /PaC&1 IZ06) S. F. Please specify other landscape features (i.e. retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) Bout hoe- A&77t1Ay1tvC- iyrrLLS dP CeryC 0e 947WWZr W M S w/ f>UW r srnn C Pl"W S F'W-d � 1= iCOAlr ra fZ454 t S$IbM P.rn DS W I /107 7`00 5 t \cdev\ forms \pennitsTianning \DRB \DRB_New Construction- 010110 Land Title Guarantee Company CUSTOMER DISTRIBUTION " d T itle GUARANTEE COMPANY nww.ii GC. COM Date: 02 -17 -2011 Our Order Number: V50030524 Property Address: 616 FOREST ROAD, LOT 5, BLOCK 1, VAIL VILLAGE FILING 6 VAIL, CO 81657 Ifyou have any inquiries or require further assistance, please contact one of the numbers below: For Title Assistance: Vail Title Dept. 610 WEST LIONSHEAD CIRCLE #200 VAIL, CO 81657 Phone: 970-476-2251 Fax: 970 - 476 -4534 EMail: eaglecountyrequests @ltgc.com SCOTT S TURNIPSEED AIA PO BOX 3388 EAGLE, CO 81631 Attn: SCOTT S TURNIPSEED Fax: 970 - 328 -3901 No Delivery DAVID MADO Phone: 970 - 328 -7044 Entail: davidmado @aol.com Linked Commitment Delivery Land Title Guarantee Company Date: 02 -17 -2011 "Ifle Our Order Number: V50030524 GUARANTEE COMPANY WWW.ITGC. COM Property Address: 616 FOREST ROAD, LOT 5, BLOCK 1, VAIL VILLAGE FILING 6 VAIL, CO 81657 Buyer/Borrower: A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED Seller /Owner: 616 FOREST ROAD LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Need a map or directions for your upcoming closing? Check out Land Title's web site at www.Itgc.com for atrecuons to anv of our w omce iocauons. ESTIMATE OF TITLE FEES TBD Commitment $100.00 If Land Title Guarantee Conpany will be closing this transaction, above fees will be collected at that time. TOTAL $100.00 > — 0� 06/04 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER! LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY INVOICE NO. VA -4051 Land Tale GUARANTEE COMPANY SCOTT S TURNIPSEED AIA 404 BROADWAY #C EAGLE, CO 81631 Owner: 616 FOREST ROAD LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Address: 616 FOREST ROAD, LOT 5, BLOCK 1, VAIL VILLAGE FILING 6 VAIL, CO 81657 Invoice Date: February 17, 2011 Order No. V50030524 Invoice Charges TBD Commitment $100.00 - Amount Due - $100.00 Due and payable upon receipt. For Remittance please refer to Invoice No. VA -4051 Please make checks payable to: Land Title Guarantee Company 5975 Greenwood Plaza Blvd. Suite 125 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 -4701 First American Title Insurance Company ALTA COMMITMENT Our Order No. V50030524 Schedule A Cust. Ref.: Property Address: 616 FOREST ROAD, LOT 5, BLOCK 1, VAIL VILLAGE FILING 6 VAIL, CO 81657 1. Effective Date: February 08, 2011 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Policy to be Issued, and Proposed Insured: "TBD" Commitment $0.00 Proposed Insured: A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A FEE SIMPLE 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: 616 FOREST ROAD LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 5. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: LOT 5, BLOCK 1, VAIL VILLAGE, SIXTH FILING, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO. ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B - Section 1 (Requirements) Our Order No. V50030524 The following are the requirements to be complied with: Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to -wit: Item (c) Payment of all taxes, charges or assessments levied and assessed against the subject premises which are due and payable. Item (d) Additional requirements, if any disclosed below: THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO. ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B - Section 2 (Exceptions) Our Order No. V50030524 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales. 7. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or tide to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 8. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 04, 1923, IN BOOK 93 AT PAGE 98. 9. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 04, 1923, IN BOOK 93 AT PAGE 98. 10. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 05, 1964, IN BOOK 183 AT PAGE 1 AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 14, 1964, IN BOOK 183 AT PAGE 141. 11. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE RECORDED PLAT OF VAIL VILLAGE FILING NO. 6. ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B - Section 2 (Exceptions) Our Order No. V50030524 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 12. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 21, 2007 AT RECEPTION NO. 200725525. THE ABOVE EXCEPTION RELATES TO CLAIMS OF EASEMENTS FOR SEWER LINES IN PLACE WITHOUT EASEMENTS OF RECORD. 13. DEED OF TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 09, 2006 FROM THE PRINCE VICTORIA LLLP TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF THE GEORGE R. CANNON MARITAL TRUST CREATED UNDER THE GEORGE R. CANNON TRUST DATED OCTOBER 17, 1997 TO SECURE THE SUM OF $3,250,000.00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED JUNE 07, 2006, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200615128. MODIFICATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED NOVEMBER 10, 2010, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 201022837. 14. DEED OF TRUST DATED DECEMBER 01, 2010 FROM 616 FOREST ROAD LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF THE GEORGE R. CANNON MARITAL TRUST CREATED UNDER THE GEORGE R. CANNON TRUST DATED OCTOBER 17, 1997 TO SECURE THE SUM OF $5,000,000.00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED DECEMBER 28, 2010, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 201026236. LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY and LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY - GRAND JUNCTION DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Note: Pursuant to CRS 10 -11 -122, notice is hereby given that: A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing district. B) A Certificate of Taxes I tie listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained from the County Treasurer's authorized agent. C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30 -10 -406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3 -5 -1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time or recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing nd is responsible for recordin or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed ". Provided that Id Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner s Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner s Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material -men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un -filed mechanic s and material -men's liens. D The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E If there has been construction, improvements or mayor repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10 -11 -123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner's policy commitments containing a mineral severance instrument exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2. A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B) That such in estate may inc ude the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10- 1- 128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlemwnt or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to tfie Colorado division of insurance within the department of regulatory agencies. Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied. DI_9=LJRE 02/2011 First American Title Insurance Company PRNACY POLICY We are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information - particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our parent company, the First American Corporation, we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information which you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal information regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values, a copy of which can be found on our website at www.firstam.com. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: * Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; • Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested to us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies, and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled respnsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information values. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with referral regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. WEBSITE Information on the calculation of premiums and other title related charges are listed at First American's website: www.firstam.com NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY OF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION AND MERIDIAN LAND TITLE, L.L.C., A COLORADO LIMITED LIABLITY COMPANY, D /B /A LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY - GRAND JUNCTION This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company, a Colorado corporation and Meridian Land Title, LLC, d/b /a Land Title Guarantee Company - Grand Junction. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to non -public personal information ( "Personal Information "). In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from: • applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web -based transaction management system; • your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates, or others; • a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction, and • the public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non - affiliates. Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: • We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you. • We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. • Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. • We regularly access security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may he entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Fonn PRIV.P0L.LTG.1 Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation ('Company'), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured names in Schedule A, as owner or mortgage of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate sic (6) months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. This Commitment shall rat be valid or binding until countersigned by a validating officer or authorized signatory. IN WffNESS WHEREOF, Fist American Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. CONDITIONS 1. The tens mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encnrnbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of the Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such iabiity is subject to the inswing provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issued one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration cause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration miles as www.alta.org FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CC.FA.tl6 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION Issued by: 1805OZ -DS in Oil Rubbed Bronze from the Freeport family Width: 10" Height: 15.25" Weight: 8 lbs. Glass: Clear Seedy Glass Bulb: One 100w Medium Base Voltage: 120v Tro: Extension: Back Plate Height Back Plate Width: 1Mr.- Notes: 3.25" 11.25" 9.5" 5.75" 640665180510 Dark Sky Fixture NOTES: 1542BZ in Bronze from the Deck and Step Lighting family Width. 3.13" Height: 4.75" Weight: 0.5 Ibs. Material: Die -Cast Aluminum Glass: Frosted Glass Lens Bulb: #912 (12w) wedge base inciuded Voltage: 12v Certification: c- ETL -us Wet UPC: 640665154245 Notes: Vertical Deck Lighting; Depth 2.5 "; Housing 3"H, 2 "W, 2 "Depth NOTES: SITE RETAINING WALL DETAIL - RETAINING UP TO 4' -0" MAX. 616 FOREST ROAD, TOWN OF VAIL W/ WALL VERTS. 3/4" = 1' -0" 2 #5 CONT. #5 ® 12' HORIZ. #5 ® 9' VERT. xl � 2' CLR. TO - VERT. REINF. 0 mulm o z a 15 DWI-S. ® 9', LAP b 3' -0' W/ WALL VERTS. �6#5 CONT. LONGIT. 3' CLR. #5 ® 9', LAP 3' -0' W/ WALL VERTS. 6' - 6 ° SITE RETAINING WALL DETAIL - RETAINING OVER 4' -0' UP TO 6' -0" MAX. 3/4' = 1' -0' 616 FOREST ROAD. TOWN OF VAIL 2#5 CONT. — #4 0 12" HORIZ - - #5 ® 12" VERT. 2" CLR. TO - VERT. REINF. A • s� I Q #5 DWLS. ® 12 ", LAP zm # ®12" TOP 3' -0" W/ WALL VERTS. o 4#4 CONT. "v TOP BOT -\N\ �- 6" BEND I T� 2" CLR :1 1 1 #4 ® 24" BOT. X12" BEND 4' - 6" SITE RETAINING WALL DETAIL - RETAINING UP TO 4' -0" MAX. 3/4" = 1' -0" X Q 616 FOREST ROAD, TOWN OF VAIL 2#5 CONT. 2" CLR. TO - VERT. REINF. # 0 12" HORIZ. #5 ® 9" VERT. X Q 6 #5 0 9" TOP 5#4 CONT. LONGIT. TOP do BOT. 2" CLR 14 ® 18" BOT. 1- 3" CIR• \— 12 BEND 5' -94" SITE RETAINING WALL DETAIL — RETAINING OVER 4' -0" UP TO 6' -0' MAX. 8 3/4" = V -0" #5 DWLS. ® 9 LAP z S -0" W/ WALL VERTS. 0 10 4" 18" BEND 616 FOREST ROAD, TOWN OF VAIL Warren Campbell From: DAVIDMADO @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 20119:46 AM To: Warren Campbell Cc: SCOTT @TURNIPHEADAIA.COM Subject: 616 Forest Road - Staking Plan Attachments: SITESTK3- 14- 11- Model. pdf Hi Warren: I have attached a .pdf file of the staking plan that Eagle Valley Surveying produced. I thought it might be useful for the site visit tomorrow. It might help everyone visualize the project better if they know that the new garage slab will be about 4.5 feet below the existing lower level slab. Please note that the retaining walls at the driveway have been staked as well. Hope this helps. P.S. I am still waiting on the stucco sample and will bring all materials with us to the meeting tomorrow. Sorry for the delay on that. Thanks, Dave Warren Campbell From: Leonard Sandoval Sent: Thursday, March 10, 20113:46 PM To: Warren Campbell Cc: 'DAVIDMADO @aol.com'; SCOTT @TURNIPHEADAIA.COM Subject: RE: Prince Victoria Review will accept nothing greater than what is on site today, but cannot exceed 1.5. to 1, with an engineer stamp. Some of the disturbed grading is shown at 1:1. These areas will be difficult to landscape at this slope. Also, revise plans show a snow melted driveway, the area in the ROW must be in a separate zone and marked at the control box, TOV or ROW. Please highlight or place note on plans. A Revocable Right of Way Permit will also be required. From: Warren Campbell Sent: Thursday, March 10, 20113:21 PM To: Leonard Sandoval Cc: 'DAVIDMADO @aol.com'; SCOTT @TURNIPHEADAIA.COM Subject: FW: Prince Victoria Review Leonard, I have been working with the architects on the new structure on West Forrest Road and they have been making changes. They have re- graded as much of the disturbed slopes back to 2:1 to address your concern, but there are some areas that were over 2:1 slope previously and they are struggling to return them to 2:1 slope. A revised plan is attached for reference. The Code gives the administrator the ability to accept steeper slopes per the following: With regard to the slopes Section 14 -6 -1, General Standards, states: This section provides a summary of grading standards within the town of Vail. All grading is subject to design review to determine compatibility with existing topography, to review the extent of existing vegetation removal and to preserve significant features on the site. The administrator may require grading plans to be stamped by a Colorado professional engineer (PE). All temporary grading shall be in compliance with currently adopted OSHA standards. All permanent finished grades shall be at a maximum two to one (2: 1) (horizontal:vertical), unless otherwise approved by the administrator and providing that no grading exceeds one to one (1:1) and that any grading steeper than two to one (2:1)(h: v) is designed and stamped by a Colorado professional engineer. Are you comfortable approving a steeper slope at the Building Permit review stage so long as a Colorado professional engineer provides a stamp? I can coordinate a meeting if necessary. Thanks Warren From: DAVIDMADO @aol.com [mailto:DAVIDMADO @aol.com] Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 2:45 PM To: Warren Campbell Cc: SCOTT @TURNIPHEADAIA.COM Subject: Re: Prince Victoria Review Hi Warren: Please see my latest responses below. Thanks, Dave In a message dated 3/8/2011 6 :21:13 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, WCampbell(ab_vailgov.com writes: Dave, If I am reading the revision to the roof eave on the west unit correctly the point directly below the eave falls through the patio on top of the garage. For this roof eave to be measured to historic grade it needs to fall within the building footprint. In this case within the garage (behind the garage door). I do not believe your revision does this. I am still working on this and will have something to you soon. Yes a condition can be put on the DRB approval that all grades will be revised to be 2:1 at the DRB hearing. Bring revision, but because a thorough review cannot occur at the hearing I will ask that a condition be placed upon any approval. Please see attached site plan with revised grading along east and west property lines. On the east side contours 8166 through 8190 have been revised. Along the west side contours 8160 through 8186 have been revised, but I was not able to get all areas below a 2:1 slope. For contours 8164 through 8174, between the property line and the drainage swale, the existing grade was so steep that I could not keep the grade below the maximum. What are our alternatives here? Warren From: DAVIDMADO @aol.com [mailto:DAVIDMADO @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 12:33 PM To: Warren Campbell Cc: SCOTT @TURNIPHEADAIA.COM Subject: Re: Prince Victoria Review Hi Warren: Please see my responses below. Warren Campbell From: DAVIDMADO @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 20113:27 PM To: Warren Campbell Cc: SCOTT @TU RNIPH EADAIA.CO M Subject: Re: Prince Victoria Review Thanks Warren, see you tomorrow. In a message dated 3/15/2011 3:23:53 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time, WCampbell @vailgov.com writes: David, I do not believe the process you discuss is appropriate. If you would like to appeal a determination of the administrator I can put something in writing and the appeal would go to the Planning and Environmental Commission for a determination of what is a footprint. To be direct I will not support your interpretation. Yes I agree the easiest solution is to move the garage door forward. I will be directing the DRB to apply a condition regarding reducing the height of the eave or modifying the footprint. Please do not forget that I will be bringing up my concern with compliance with the Code requirements regarding crawlspaces and impact to the site. I have concern over the extent of crawlspaces and disturbance of the site per 14- 10 -5(L), Building Materials and Design. Warren From: DAVIDMADO @aol.com [mai Ito: DAVIDMADO @ aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 10:39 AM To: Warren Campbell Cc: SCOTT @TURNIPHEADAIA.COM Subject: Re: Prince Victoria Review Warren Yes you are correct, this roof eave is the same one we discussed last week and although I do have a solution I wanted to get some feedback from the DRB first. The simplest way to rectify the problem is to simply move the garage doors out to the face of the pilasters which would put the eave, at the great room above, just within the building footprint. Unfortunately that creates several issues that are in my opinion less desirable than the way it is currently designed. Firstly the garage door as drawn it set back 42" which will make it less visible from the street, and it makes for better driving access. Secondly if the garage doors are moved forward the crawl space to the south will need to be extended to keep within the allowed 600 s.f., creating more enclosed space and impacting our mud room. I would like to appeal to the board that the footprint of the building be determined to be at the face of the pilasters, rather than at the garage door. It seems to me that we could have the foundation run along the front of the pilasters and, although the door is recessed, we could call that the building footprint. Other than the door being recessed the exterior would be almost identical. Is this a reasonable request and something that you would be in support of? Thanks, Dave In a message dated 3/14/2011 5:09:09 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time, WCampbell(cDvailgov.com writes: David, I got the plans you resubmitted. I am going through them and it appears to me that your roof on the western unit is over the permitted 33 feet. The point directly below the roof eave goes through a lower deck and into the driveway in front of the garage door. This will be a condition on any approval to comply with 33 feet at Building Permits. Please start thinking about how you might address this in case DRB asks. I attached a scan of the area I am talking about. Thanks Warren From: DAVIDMADO @aol.com [mailto:DAVIDMADO @aol.com] Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 1:15 PM To: Warren Campbell Cc: SCOTT @TURNIPHEADAIA.COM Subject: Re: Prince Victoria Review Hi Warren: Scott and I will plan on being there by 3:00. There is an update from my response last Thursday when I said that I would have the samples to you by the end of the day Friday. Unfortunately the stucco guys had the wrong color and had to redo their sample and were supposed to have it ready by Monday morning. That being said I will be dropping off the samples with the revised drawings either late in the day Monday, or first thing Tuesday morning. Thanks, Dave In a message dated 3/10/2011 4:11:33 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, WCampbell(cDvailgov.com writes: You best believe I will be there . .........................Please plan to be there at 3:00 1 believe you are second on the agenda. From: DAVIDMADO @aol.com [mailto Sent: Thursday, March 10, 20114:01 To: Warren Campbell Cc: SCOTT @TURNIPHEADAIA.COM Subject: Re: Prince Victoria Review Hi Warren: DAVIDMADO @aol.com] PM I will drop off the material samples to your office tomorrow afternoon. I will print all of our revised drawings and get them to you with a new digital set by the end of the day Monday. Eagle Valley Surveying will be on site Tuesday morning to update the staking. Also thanks for your attempt to get the grading issues approved. Will you be at the DRB meeting on Wednesday? Thanks, Dave In a message dated 3/10/2011 3:25:56 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, WCampbell(c)vailgov.com writes: Gentlemen, I have put this item on the DRB agenda for next Wednesday. Prior to that meeting I would appreciate a new paper set of the plans and digital set. This is to ensure I have the most accurate plans since there have been several changes. I would like this by first thing Tuesday morning. Please bring material samples to me prior to the meeting or to the hearing itself. We will be visiting the site so please have the building footprint staked on the site. Does not need to be surveyed in, but somewhat accurate based on measurement in the field. Anything that is not fully resolve may become a condition for compliance at Building Permits. Thanks Warren From: DAVIDMADO @aol.com [mailto:DAVIDMADO @ aol.com] Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 2:45 PM To: Warren Campbell Cc: SCOTT @TURNIPHEADAIA.COM Subject: Re: Prince Victoria Review Hi Warren: Please see my latest responses below. Thanks, Dave In a message dated 3/8/2011 6:21:13 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, WCampbell(d)vailgov.com writes: Dave, If I am reading the revision to the roof eave on the west unit correctly the point directly below the eave falls through the patio on top of the garage. For this roof eave to be measured to historic grade it needs to fall within the building footprint. In this case within the garage (behind the garage door). I do not believe your revision does this. I am still working on this and will have something to you soon. Yes a condition can be put on the DRB approval that all grades will be revised to be 2:1 at the DRB hearing. Bring revision, but because a thorough review cannot occur at the hearing I will ask that a condition be placed upon any approval. Please see attached site plan with revised grading along east and west property lines. On the east side contours 816E through 8190 have been revised. Along the west side contours 8160 through 8186 have been revised, but I was not able to get all areas below a 2:1 slope. For contours 8164 through 8174, between the property line and the drainage swale, the existing grade was so steep that I could not keep the grade below the maximum. What are our alternatives here? Warren From: DAVIDMADO @aol.com [mai Ito: DAVIDMADO @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 12:33 PM To: Warren Campbell Cc: SCOTT @TURNIPHEADAIA.COM Subject: Re: Prince Victoria Review Hi Warren: Please see my responses below. Thanks, Dave In a message dated 3/7/2011 4:49:17 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, WCampbell(d.)vailgov.com writes: David and Scott, Your response to question one below is what I expected, but I wanted to check. Your response to question number two caused me to check the eave elevations that I did not see at first take. The portions of roof that I believed are over the allowed 33 feet in height are those two eaves on each unit which are identified as being 8,200 feet in elevation. It appears that the east unit is at just a few inches over 32 feet in height as the roof eave is at 8,200 and the location directly below falls within the building footprint so height is measured to the interpolated historic grade of 8167.9 (shy of 8168') feet running through the garage below. The west unit eave identified as 8,200 feet does not fall within the building footprint and is therefore measured to the proposed driveway grade of 8163. 1 include the definition of height measurement below so my answer maybe will make more sense. This type of issue is solved by most architects and designers by reconfiguring the roof to ensure the location below the eave falls within the proposed building footprint. I have modified the lower level floor plan to accommodate the oversight of the eave area for the west unit. Please review the attached revised sheet A2.1 and let me know if this solution will be adequate. I have also revised the mudroom /garage entrance, below the deck, to address a couple of design issues. HEIGHT The distance measured vertically from any point ors a proposed or existing roof or eaves to the existing or finished grade (whichever is more restrictive) located directly below said point of the roof or eaves. Within any building footprint, height shall be measured vertically f rom any point on a proposed or existing roof to the existing grade directly below said point on a proposed or existing roof. With regard to the slopes Section 14 -6 -1, General Standards, states the following: This section provides a summary of grading standards within the town of Vail. All grading is subject to design review to determine compatibility with existing topography, to review the extent of existing vegetation removal and to preserve significant features on the site. The administrator may require grading plans to be stamped by a Colorado professional engineer (PE). All temporary grading shall be in compliance with currently adopted OSHA standards. All permanent finished grades shall be at a maximum two to one (2:1) (horizontal: vertical), unless otherwise approved by the administrator and providing that no grading exceeds one to one (1:1) and that any grading steeper than two to one (2:1)(h:v) is designed and stamped by a Colorado professional engineer. The administrator, Public Works, is requesting that any disturbed slopes be returned to a 2:1 slope. I can coordinate a meeting if you desire to make a case to the Public Works Department to allow for a steeper slope and develop a plan for slope stabilization. We will revise the grading for the areas that are not in compliance so that all grading will be no greater than 2:1 slope. Since we are getting close to the meeting date can we bring the revised sheets with us to the meeting? Thank you for the revised materials submitted thus far. As your site is over 30% slope I will be reviewing to ensure the Code permitted maximum site disturbance is shown on the plans and the other provisions of 12- 21 -12, Restrictions in Specific Zones on Excessive Slopes, Vail Town Code Thanks Warren From: DAVIDMADO @aol.com [mai Ito: DAVIDMADO@aol.com] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 2:58 PM To: Warren Campbell; SCOTT @TURNIPHEADAIA.COM Subject: Re: Prince Victoria Review Hi Warren: My responses are below in red. In a message dated 3/4/2011 4:38:49 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, WCampbell(c)vailgov.com writes: David, Thank you for the revised information. I am continuing my review, and here are some additional comments you can begin to address. 1) On Sheet A2.4 why is the triangular area created by the stair case and the exterior walls not counted towards GRFA? The roof trusses on the third level ( kitchen on east unit and dining on west unit) continue to the stairwell walls. The corners are then over framed on top of those trusses with only a few feet of headroom. Since there is not any usable space, except for the range hood vents, and it is completely unusable, it never occurred to me that it might be counted towards GRFA 2) The height of your structure appears to be over the all.owable 33 feet in two locations. I calculate height as being 34.25 feet from the driveway grade of 8163 to the roof eaves above at 8197.25. Theses eave elevations are calculated based upon your proposed 6:12 slope from the ridge elevations of 8207.25 and 8206.25. Please confirm my calculations and lower the roof heights to fall under 33 feet. The two locations I find as being over are a result of the fact that the roof eaves are not located over building footprint below and therefore are measured to proposed grade of 8163 in the driveway. Could you please be more specific as to the two locations. Also the roof plan has all of the eave heights. 3) The regarded areas depicted along the east and west sides of the lot do not appear to be at a finished grade of 2:1 or less in slope. Please adjust and provide a revised site plan and all other plans depicting grade. Will it be acceptable to have our soils engineer provide an erosion control solution for those areas instead of re- grading? 4) The street cut for utilities will be required to complete a 1.5 inch mill and asphalt overlay of West Forrest Road within the disturbed /damaged areas. I will provide a note on a revised site plan and grading plan to address this. appreciate getting the comments as you get to them. Hopefully by the time we get to our meeting everything will be addressed. I am continuing my review, but wanted to get the comments coming as I get them. Thanks Warren From: DAVIDMADO @aol.com [mailto: DAVIDMADO @aol.com] Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 9:18 AM To: Warren Campbell; SCOTT @TURNIPHEADAIA.COM Subject: Re: Prince Victoria Review Hi Warren: I dropped off the revised drawings that you requested yesterday, and I have attached a .pdf file of them to this email. I have included responses to your following comments in red. For some reason the formatting from your original email did not translate over when I hit the reply button, but the content is still intact minus your numbering. In a message dated 2/28/2011 12:12:20 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, WCampbell(@vailgov.com writes: Scott and David, I am reviewing your plans for the new house on Forrest Road as Bill Gibson is on vacation in New Zealand for the next couple of weeks. Some elements I can tell immediately that I will need are identified below. I choose to send you these requests ASAP so you can begin working on theses questions and comments verse waiting for my review to be complete. In looking at the plans it appears your site my exceed 30% slope as defined in Section 12 -21- 12, Restrictions in Excessive Zones on Excessive Slopes, Vail Town Code. Please provide a plan overlaying a 100 foot by 100 foot with a 10 foot by 10 foot grid over the site per the requirements in this section. If it is determined that the site is in excess of 30% the project will need to conform with all the regulations in 12- 21 -12. There is a new sheet A1.2 which has the overall site plan with contours, and a 100' x 100' grid divided into 10' x 10' quadrants. It appears as thought the majority of the site, except for the existing house and driveway, are over a 30% slope. The retaining walls associated with the driveway are shown to be 6 feet in height. Per 14 -6 -7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code, retaining walls within the front setback are not to exceed 3 feet in height unless associated with a garage located within the front setback per the provisions of Section 12- 21 -12(K) and 12- 21- 12(L). If the site is not in excess of 30% slope and a garage is not placed within the front setback these retaining walls will need to be revised. The ell shaped retaining wall at the north and east property lines has been modified to bring the height down to a maximum of 3 feet. Also the retaining wall along the east property line has been shifted to the west to conform to the minimum 2 foot distance from an adjacent property line. The site plan, landscape plan, and grading plan have been revised to reflect these modifications. As stated early in the process Staff is concerned about the extensive incorporation of crawlspaces throughout the structure pursuant to Section 14- 10-5(L), Building Materials and Design, Vail Town Code. This provision is concerned with the sensitivity of designs with respect to a site. Having an expansive crawlspace located on the ground floor with and exposed wall face on the north elevation is of concern. Please provide several cross - sections through the site showing footer depths in order to aid staff in understanding the design behind the plans submitted. Firstly since our February 21 Final Review submittal we made some changes to the second level floor plan to improve the relationship of the foundation to the site which are included on sheet A2.2. I have included two building sections, sheets A4.1 and A4.4 which show the foundation, excavation, and existing grade. As you can see we have provided a design that steps up the slope, with an emphasis on minimizing the depth of excavation. Secondly the crawl space referred to on the ground floor between the garages is indicated on sheet A4.4. The sheet in the attached .pdf file has a revision after the drawing I dropped off yesterday. Notice that the line of excavation which previously indicated over excavation below the slab, implying that it would be filled back in to create the crawls space, now shows the existing grade to be just below the slab. Initially I depicted this line of excavation to 10 account for the existing structure but in reality the lower level of the existing house is four feet above the lower level of the new structure, which the revised A4.4 indicates. Access to all crawlspaces cannot exceed a 12 square foot opening and measure less than 5 feet in height from the soil (below any proposed slabs) to the underside of the structural floor members above. The access shown to the crawlspaces on your plans measure approximately 2.5 feet in width resulting in a maximum opening height of 4.8 feet. The access to the crawlspace from the garage in the western unit exceeds 12 square feet with the two access openings, measuring approximately 10 feet in width each. The access to any crawlspace housing mechanical equipment is required to be the minimum dimensions of the largest piece of equipment in the space. Please confirm the location of mechanical equipment in your proposed crawlspaces will not cause a need for a greater than 12 square foot access opening. All crawl spaces and accesses have been modified to conform to your above comments. See sheets A2.1, A2.2, A4.1, and A4.4. Please not that the electrical panel located in the crawlspaces will have to be relocated in order to comply with the Town's adopted Energy Code regulations requiring a minimum of a 6.5 feet of working head height for the panel. The electrical panels have been relocated to the garages, see sheets A1.1 and A1.2. It appears that you are providing snow storage at a rate of 30% for an unheated driveway. You are depicting snow storage in areas where there is landscaping. Snow storage areas need to be located in areas that do not contain trees and shrubs to avoid damage to the landscaping. The driveway is going to be snow melted and is now labeled accordingly. Snow storage is indicated and is just over the 10% of driveway area as required. Landscaping has been revised to remove all shrubs and trees from the snow storage areas. See sheets A1.1 and L1. Hopefully I have addressed all of your comments and let me know if there is anything else you need. Thanks, Dave Madow 970 - 328 -7044 11 I am continuing to review the plans and confirm compliance with site coverage and GRFA and other adopted regulations. Please provide responses and revised plans to these comments by no later than 9:00 AM on March 4 Thanks, Warren Campbell, AICP, LEED AP Chief Of Planning Community Development Department TOWNOF� lAll✓ Direct 970479 -2148 Fax 970 - 479 -2452 www.vailgov.com How are we doing? Click the following link to complete the Community Development Survey. http: / /www.vailgov.com /channels /survey /showSur vey.asp ?survey id =55 &dept id =38 mew Join me in making a cl7 "*M*''7wk b4tote VOW tvimf 12 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ROUTING FORM Routed To: Leonard Sandoval, PW Date Routed: 02/25/11 Routed By: Planner Date Due: 03/02/11 Project Name: Prince Victoria Duplex Project #: PRJ11 -0039 Activity #: DRB110039 Description of work: New duplex Address: 616 Forest Road Legal: Lot: 12 Block: Subdivision: I Vail Das Schone Filing 3 Status: ❑ Approved ❑ Approved with conditions ® Denied Comments: Date Reviewed: 3 -2 -2011 ❑ Fire Department Issues. Need additional review by Fire Department. Limits of disturbance fence required to be pushed back a minimum of 10 ft from the edge of asphalt on W. Forest Road during the winter months. Show BMP ( Best Management Practices) below site along W. Forest Road and on Inlet Storm Drains. Provide Title Report Provide stamped approved engineered drawings of proposed retaining walls 4 ft or greater in height. Regrading of distrubed areas along the east and west side of lot are not shown /returned at 2:1. adjust and revise. Is driveway heated? Street cut for utilities, repair will require an complete 1.5 in. mill and asphalt overlay of W. Forest Road within the disturbed/damaged areas. Iandoval 2 0 Q jE.J 0 z c C7 I Z us ui z ui IL 0 4-J -C u cd CL V) V) 0 PLANNING CHECK SHEET Property Information Property Address 616 Forest Road Parcel # 210107211005 Legal Description Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 6 Development Site Area Ac 1.034 Sq Ft 45,041 Buildable n/a Zoning / SDD # Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential Land Use Designation Low Density Residential Known Non-Conformities n/a Previous Approvals n/a Hazard Zones Snow Avalanche n/a Sections 12-12, 12-21, 14-6 & 14-7 Debris Flow n/a Rockfall n/a Excessive Slopes n/a (Site Disturbance 12-21-14) Floodplain n/a Wetlands Y/N n/a Creeks, Streams Setback n/a Proposed n/a Section 12-14-17 Sidewalks/ Trails n/a Contact Information Planner/ Date WC 3/4/11 Owner Contact Info Prince Victoria LLLP (Maggie Morrissey) 303-722-7743 Primary Contact/ Owner Turnipseed Architects, 328-3900 Representative Info Project Information Project Description Demolition of Existing Structure Construct New Duplex Land Use Application(s) # DRB110039 Proposed Uses new two-family duplex Permitted, Conditional, permitted Prohibited? (As defined by Zoning) Date Routed/ DRT Meeting Discussed at DRT 2/23/11 Routed 2/25/11 Commercial Floor Area Existing n/a Proposed n/a Gross Residential Floor Area (Chapter 15) Total Allowed 9,352 -Existing demo -Proposed Primary 5,611 -Existing n/a -Proposed 5,608 Secondary3,741 -Existing n/a -Proposed 3,741 Total 3 s.f. Primary Total 3 s.f. Secondary Total 0 s.f. Remaining Remaining Remaining 250 or Interior Conversion? n/a Zoning District Standards Front 20 Proposed 27 Setbacks (perimeter) Side 15/15 Proposed 15/15 Projections 14-10-4 Rear 15 Proposed 300 Minimum Lot Area/ Width Required 15,000 Proposed 45,041 Site Coverage 20% Allowed 9,008 Proposed 5,304 Building Height Allowed 30/33 Proposed 34.25 Landscaping 60% Required 27,024 Proposed 37,183 Sections 14-10-8 & 14-10-9 Plant size 6’, 2”, 5 gal. Proposed Meets and exceeds Fences n/a Proposed n/a Height Allowed 3’ in front Proposed 3’ in front and 6’ setback /6’ everywhere else Retaining Walls Setback 2’ from property Proposed complies Sec. 14-6-7 lines Driveway Max Curb-cuts 48 Proposed 24’ Sections 14-3-1 & 14-3-2 Max Slope 12% heated Proposed 5% Min Width 12 min Proposed n/a Heated Y/N Y Drive Material pavers Snow Storage % 10% Proposed 31% (810 s.f.) Parking Spaces Required 9 Proposed 9 Sections 12-10 & 14-5 Loading n/a Proposed n/a Lighting Allowed 45 Proposed 17 Section 14-10-7 Waste Management Wildlife Proof/ n/a Screened n/a Section 5-9 Resistant Screening Required Y Proposed Y Sections 14-10-9 & 14-10-10 Roof Material Complies Y/N Y Sections 12-11-3C & 14-10-5 Building Separation Complies Y/N Y Section 14-10-6 Adopted View Corridors Complies Y/N n/a Utilities (Location, easements) Y Section 14-10-10 Grading (Less than 2:1) Y Section 14-6 Development Impact Fees / Employee Housing n/a Mitigation Traffic Impact n/a Art In Public Places n/a Height needs to be corrected on Building Permit Set Notes