Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutB06-0196 ( "I'OWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL,CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Permit # B06-0196 Project#: PRJ03-0468 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Status . . . : ISSUED Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD Applied . . : 07/18/2006 Parcel No...: 210107101016 Issued . . . 06/26/2009 Expires . .: 09/26/2007 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 07/19/2006 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR HYDER CONSTRUCTION, INC 06/11/2009 Phone: 303-825-1313 543 SANTA FE DRIVE DENVER CO 80204 License: 109-A APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS 07/19/2006 Phone: 612-332-1500 600 FOSHAY TOWER 821 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 License: C000001981 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Occupancy Type Factor Sq Feet Valuation NIGHT CLUBS (A2) ZONE 4 IB 299 . 08 27, 353 $8, 180, 735 .24 CHURCHES (A3) ZONE 4 IB 369 . 90 8, 605 $3 , 182, 989 . 50 BUSINESS (B) & HMP (H5 ZONE 4 IB 300 .40 31, 130 $9, 351, 452 . 00 EDUCATIONAL (E) ZONE 4 IB 322 . 53 670 $216, 095 . 10 INDUSTRIAL/MOD HAZ ( ZONE 4 IB 183 . 77 29, 600 $5, 439, 592 . 00 MERCANTILE (M) ZONE 4 IB 220 . 56 2, 445 $539, 269 .20 RESIDENTIAL/HOTELS ( ZONE 4 IB 302 .22 86, 991$26, 290, 420 . 02 RESIDENTIAL/MULTFAM( ZONE 4 IB 250 .22 133 , 695$33 , 453, 162 . 90 STORAGE/MOD HAZ (S1) ZONE 4 IB 169 . 75 23, 080 $3, 917, 830 . 00 STORAGE/LOW HAZ (S2) ZONE 4 IB 167 . 15 75, 773$12, 665, 456 . 95 Totals . . . 399, 510$103, 237, 002 . 9* TOV Adjusted Valuation: 3,237,002.91 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $237,002.91 **ssss*****sss�***�ss�******r+**s**ssrs*�*►*►*�*********ass*****►s*• FEE S UMMARY *ss*****+*►*******r*******►*�sss****:r►►r*a***t*ss**�*****ses Building------> 378,777.45 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees---> 157,17�.90 Plan Check---> 3 7 8,7 7 7.4 5 Recreation Fee--------------> 3 9 9,510.0 0 Additional Fees-----------> $9,3 7 5.0 0 ` Investigation-> $o.00 TOTAL FEES-------------> 157,177.90 Total Permit Fee----------> 166,552.90 ' Will Call-----> $3.00 Payments-------------------> 166,552.90 BALANCE DUE---------> $0.00 ■..as*++**+sss�***#.**:*}+**r*:*s**.:*++**x**s**:a.s***�s**+*t*��.s**::.*+s«*s»s+�.►�.�****r.sa***:�s+***s**+s*t**�.+****:r***a**sas*�***s..s..rsa Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e-mailed to applicant. 12/18/2006 cciavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set tor plan c stamped by TOV 12/13/06 . An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer. 03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR: 1215- G&E permit approval only. Conciitic apply. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only 06/12/2007 CDAVIS Action: PA Tower Crane footing pads . No additional fees assessed 07/16/2007 jplano Action: CR Additional work being requested to be addec phasing, correction letter sent . 08/O1/2007 jplano Action: CR Second correction letter sent, insuffient information supplied. 3) The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested added to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design protessioz architect and/or engineer. The design protessionals are to verity that the additic work being requested is not in contlict with the corrections that are requested regard: full building permit. All sheets are to be stamped and signeci by the associated design protessional . The architectural and the plumbing sheets have not been stamped. The stamp on the stri sheets has not been signed. The stamp on the electrical sheets has not been signec 4 There is insufficient detail to approve this submittal. Some examples are: a) There are several sections that are pertinent to this request that are not pro� b) The elevator pit sections 10/S4 . 04, 18/S4 . 04, 19/54 . 04, 20/54 . 04 are missing. c) Ramp transition section 22/56 . 01, 6/S6 . 01, 7/54 . 04 are missing d) Exterior tounciation wall connection to the matt slab 9/S6 . OlD, 27/56 . 01, 6/S. O: 7/S6 . 01 e) Sump pit details 28/S4 . 04 and 29/54 . 04 f) Column schedule, transition of the columns to slab? g) Slab steps 11/S6 . OlD. This review has stopped because of lack of information. 5 The Public Works Department in Vail has not approved the submittal tor addition� to be added to the phasing. Their approval will be necessary. 08/06/2007 jplano Action: PA Additional work approved tor phasing. Unde� plumbing, undergrounci electrical, rebar and concrete placement tor elevator and. sl pits. NO APPROVAL FOR MAT SLAB 09/11/2007 jplano Action: AP Full permit approved, see conditions 10/22/2007 DPLACE Action: PA REV 4 IR 5881: Approved shop drawings tor : only. No charge. 10/22/2007 dplace Action: PA REV 3, IR 5512 : SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAI CHARGE. 11/13/2007 ependley Action: AP REV5/IR6042 . Approved shop drawings tor de: stamps . No added valuation. 11/15/2007 ependley Action: AP Rev7/IR6058 . Approved RFI-0237, No added valuation. Added plan review fee of $60 . 00 due 11/30/2007 jplano Action: AP Rev6/IR6057 . Approved RFI-0221, No added valuation. Added plan review fee of $60 . 00 due 12/18/2007 JPLANO Action: AP Rev9/IR6236 . Approved shop drawings tor po: tension slabs, no added valuation 12/26/2007 jplano Action: AP Rev10/IR6252 . Approved changing a post ten: cable with thickened slab. $120 . 00 due 12/27/2007 MROYER Action: AP Revll/IR6266, 6267 . Rebar shop drawings rev= for appropiate stamps, no charge 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA REV 12 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER LAYTON ST #05510-004 (EMBEDS Q LEVEL 1, 2, 3 ns 4) FROM JT STEEL NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA EV. 13 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER SUBMITTAL 016 (STUD RAILS, LEVELS 4 & 5) FROM SUNCOAST NO ADDTIONAL CHARGE 06/10/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev14, 15, 16, IR6685, 6687, 7744 are approved hours of plan review due, $720 . 00 07/08/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 19, IR 7989 are approved, Bulletins 10, 25, 29, 31, 35, 40 - 8 hours of plan review due, $480 . 00 08/Ol/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev17, IR 7777 are approved, Bulletins 023 023A, swimming pool revisions, $360 due 08/O1/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 20, IR8245 are approved, storm and sewe connetions outside the builciing, public works has approved it. No charge trom Sate 09/29/2008 jplano Action: AP Revl8, IR7988 are approved. The sub-duct s� for J the ciryers and range hoods are not approved. 46 hours ot plan review due = $2760 . ( 12/04/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev22/IR9384 - This is the revised ADMOD tc exterior wood above 40 ' . This is to be approved by the tire department to be issued. No ch� f rom SB 12/18/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev23/IR9488, Additional tire-stopping subr approved, no charge O1/02/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev21/IR9008, Approved Bulletins 036, 037, 040, 043, 044, 050, 051, 052, 055, 056 and firestopping submittal . 055, generator fueling needs fire department approval prior to issuance 056, deck extention needs DRB approval prior to issuance 29 hours of plan review due=$1740 . 00 02/09/2009 jplano Action: NA Rev24/IR9666 - Fire Alarm Plans to be apprc the fire department 02/09/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev25/IR9587 - "3M Fire Resistive Wrap 15A' approved for HVAC ducting as shown on apporved plans . 2 hours of plan review Due=$120 . 00 02/10/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev26/IR9663 - Subduct system tor resident= dryer system approved. 8 hours of plan review due=$480 . 00 04/16/2009 jplano Action: CR Rev27, IR9840 - Bulletins 59-73 , correctior sent, revisions needed and full sized drawings for collation 04/23/2009 jplano Action: CR Rev28, IR9926 - Submittal to be stamped anc by FPE. This is the exit passageway conditions . 05/28/2009 ependley Action: AP Rev28/IR9926 approved. No added valuation. plan review at $240 . 00 06/18/2009 jeaton Action: AP REV 27/IR # 9840 approved by Satebuilt . No value & no added square footage. Invoiced 10 Hours of Plan Review at $600 . 00 09/30/2009 JEaton Action: AP Rev 29 IR#10435 Approved Bulletin 110 Therr Insulation No added Valuation 3 hrs @ $60 per hr =$180 . 00 JEaton Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the Hc Cross Utility relocation permit request. The applicant shall remove only those trees wh: absolutely necessary for the utility relocation work. 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the application to dewater the site. 03/31/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning recieved a bond to cover the Grad= Excavation in the amount ot 3 .2 million. Planning has approved the grading and exc permit. 06/25/2007 Warren Action: COND Planning has approved the tull building pe� dated recieved on May 29, 2007, with a single condition. A complete Design Review aplication will need to be submitted tor review and approval tor the additonal set ot stairs f rom the pool deck to West Meadow Drive. 08/20/2007 Warren Action: AP The set ot plans provicied to allow tro the of some work prior to release ot a tull building permit has been approved. The plans date stamped July 26, 2007 09/05/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning is approving the set ot plans date August 3, 2007, with the condition that the applicant submits a revised landscaping plan to� and approval prior to requesting a TCO. 11/02/2007 GRUTHER Action: AP REV 3, IR 5512 : SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAI CHARGE. 06/12/2008 Warren Action: AP The planning departmetn signs ott on Buller and 23A with one condition. The gate on teh new set ot stairs shal be as the base ot t stairs on the pool deck not on the top of the stairs adjacent to Meadow Drive. 09/26/2008 Warren Action: CR Regarding the above permit my only comment I need a detail ot the gate at the top ot the stairs serving as an exit trom the poc This detail shall be depict the desired gate which tits not only the aesthetics oj Four Season but that ot the Meadow Drive streetscape. The design should take into accot need tor security from the public side of the tence and be design with this in mind. Fc example the Town does not want to see a nice gate submitted, approved, and installed and t because ot security reason we add a piece ot plexi-glass to the gate as an atterthought . � plans are dated 5-8-08 Bullentin #40 . Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received 04/17/06 . Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding. Review: Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied: 1. Fire Dept staging on south side ot project is shown on east end. The apporved : on the west end. The hydrant on the west end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on south side. Sheet A0 .3 . 00 2 . Sheet A0 .3 . 05 does not show an acceptable route to the interior of the buildinc the Fire Command Center. 3 . The plans submitted by RJA are not stamped and are labeled "Not tor Constructic 4 . The plans show a dead end corridor behind the front desk. 5 . 12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is g� Relocate electrical disconnect to the trailer or provide ready access on southwest of site. Location as proposed on plan submitted 12/13/06 is not accepted. 03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: PA g and e permit is approved 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E only 07/11/2007 McGee Action: AP Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3A approved tor l: work as submitted 7 11 07 . 09/07/2007 McGee Action: AP The full permit is approved as noted: Life Safety Report 5 22 07 1. LSR, MOU' s, and Admin Mod' s must be signed by Rybka et.al . as the Fire Protect= Engineer of Record. 2 . Page 14 ot the LSR reterence occupancy ot the pre-tunction and ballroom is not accepted. RJA alledgedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence ha: been presented. 3 . Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4 . Appendix B - Small Scale Plans, is not accepted. � 5. MOU 5/22/07 ret Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to addition� review. 12/08/2008 MAH Action: AP Rev21/IR9008 - This is the revised ADMOD t< exterior wood above 40 ' . This is to be approved by the tire department to be issued. No ch� f rom SB. PER VERBAL FROM MIKE VAUGHAN, OK TO APPROVE FOR FIRE. 02/25/2009 drhoacies Action: AP Permanent location ot FDC tor South side oi building. 03/26/2009 mcgee Action: AP Sub duct revisions 1 27 09 per RJA 1. Add clean out of lint traps to OEM manual for project . 09/25/2009 mvaughan Action: AP revision dated 4/20/2009 revisions to two t exit passageways. Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 10/20/2006 ls Action: DN Awaiting for additional information 12/20/2006 ls Action: PA Approval to allow grading anci prep work to� installation ot their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued tor t site access for small construction vehicles ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive. 03/26/2007 ls Action: PA Staging plan tor Phase 1 ot the G&E permit approved only. Engineer approval tor the G&E permit still required currently under review. staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only 08/07/2007 csalli Action: AP aciditional work proposed tor phased permit approved, no approval for mat slab 09/13/2007 csalli Action: DN waiting for executed MOU 10/04/2007 TK Action: AP Approved Building Permit with the condtion; in the memo dated 8/5/07 from Chad Salli . 07/31/2008 csalli Action: AP revised sheets C17, C20 ciated 7/18/08 and : cla, C18A, C19 dated 7/1/08 approved Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS Item: 05700 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH #4#####t###**######i**#######rttik###*#t#t#k####*i##i###t##4#t#i######t##*#*###+k####i########t#t######t#t#**#####�►##rt*######t####*##f#####*#i#### See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TEL 149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM -4 PM. SIGNATURE OF OWNER HIMSELF AND OWNER i *#**#**##****#**##*##***##**#**#***#####**####***##*****�k***##******##***�k#**##**#**#*#**�k*****�k*###***# CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit# B06-0196 as of 10-07-2009 Status: ISSUED ******************************************************************************************************** Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Applied: 07/18/2006 Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLGTHOMAS J. BRINK Issued:06/26/2009 612-332-1500 To Expire: 09/26/2007 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Conditions: Cond: CON0008815 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3/28/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the full building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original comment number for clarity. General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule"to prevent a room that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor". The Fire and Life Safety Report prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants. These will be required for full permit issuance. General: The Fire& Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved prior to the approval for full building permit. 3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units 3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is discharging. 8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C-414, is actually a horizontal portion of Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or remove the designation of passageway. 10) See the general comment above. 11) See the general comment above. 12) See the general comment above. 13) See the general comment above. 16) See the general comment above. 22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be tested in accordance with ASTME 119,tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire-resistance rating not less than the fire-resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the window when responding for full building permit. 23) See the general comment above. 39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures. Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly. This item has no impact on the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building permit issuance. 42) See response the comment number 39. 46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space is not accessory. 46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 210A as there is no access to stair Q. Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel. 49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved by the Town of Vail's Building Official. 57 through 61 and 149)The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 14 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 17 (BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FR� INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED Cond: 35 (P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM)FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: 5 (PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEME LOCATION CERTIFICATE(ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPR SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC. Cond: CON0009095 The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review aplication for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs added from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive, within 30 days of the release of the building permit. Cond: CON0009121 The applicant shall submit a seperate Design Review application for review and approval for all signage design, locations, and materials prior to installation. Cond: CON0009294 The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan which addresses the landscaping conflicts created by the shallow soild depths on the culvert containing Spraddle Creek. This plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to requesting a certifcate of occupancy. Cond: CON0009330 SAFEbuilt Colorado Conditions of Approval To: Layton Construction Re: Full Building Permit Conditions of Approval The following conditions will be required to be addressed prior to construction. Sufficient time shall be granted for review, response and approval before work is initiated. Building Department- The items listed within the building department comments are numbered to correspond with the 3 round comment letter dated 08/21/2007. 46. Change the exiting from Vestibule 210A. It appears to exit through intervening room that is not accessory to the vestibule. HGA Response: We submit that the adjacent space is accessory. Vestibule 210A services mechanical rooms and the service elevators. To exit from Vestibule 210A the occupants have to pass through Vestibule 275A, which is basically for the spa staff, then through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area,then to hallway 279,then through exit passageway 293,then through exit passageway 297,then to exit discharge. The issue is that the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area is not accessory to the mechanical rooms. It is accessory for the rooms off Vestibule 275A for the staff of the spa but not the mechanical areas. Please change the layout accordingly. HKS/HGS Response(7/18/07): Vestibule 210A is purely circulation space and does not carry an occupant load. This vestibule provides connection between the Spa and the service elevators, IDF Room 210, and Mechanical Room 257. Relative to egress, it provides the egress route for the one occupant from IDF 210 and the one occupant from Mechanical 257 (as shown on A0.3.02). IDF 210, Mechanical 257, Vestibule 210A, and Service Elevator Lobby E-202 are considered to be part of the overall Spa as they serve Spa functions. The service elevators stop at this location solely to provide connection to the Spa. IDF 210 houses audio-visual, telephone, and data system equipment that specifically serves the Spa and must be accessed by Spa personnel. Similarly, Mechanica1257 houses the equipment serving the pools within Room 255 and must be accessed by Spa staff. In summary, we submit that all these spaces are part of the overall Spa and are "accessory"to each other. Therefore, current layout provides egress that complies with IBC 1013.2 as the spaces are accessory, are not hazard occupancies, and provide a discernible path of travel to an exit. This comment is in reference to the electrical room#212. Please revise 64. A2.03.1 - Wall tag both shafts located in room 304 (storage room). Wall tags must reference an approved assembly from the partition schedule. HGA Response: Wall tag has been added. One shaft in room 304 does not have wall tags. HKS/HGS Response(7/18/07): The drawing has been updated to include wall tags for this shaft. Still have one shaft not tagged Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. 152. Provide accessible parking spaces per IBC Table 1106.1. Providing 212 spaces would reyuire 7 to be accessible, 2 of those to be van accessible. Verify 98" of vertical clearance for the van spots. HGA Response: We submit that the number of accessible parking stalls complies with IBC Table 1106.1 and section 1106.5. The hotel is operating on 100%valet parking stalls, with an additional 59 self-park stalls for fractional ownership, full ownership, and employee. Per Table 1106.1, 3 stalls are required for the self-parking, and at least one of the three is required to be van accessible. Plan sheet A0.3.01 indicates there are 228 parking spaces. Spaces marked for Valet parking number 78. With those counts, Table 1106.1.3 would require 5 accessible spaces with one van accessible space. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Per previous response, most of the parking spaces are valet only. There are 59 self-park stalls that will be allocated to fractional ownership, full ownership condos, and employees. The drawings have been updated to identify each space as either valet or self-park. We submit that only the 59 self-park stalls are considered per Table 1106.1 and that the number of accessible spaces required are provided. Deducting the 78 Valet parking from the total spaces, you are still required to add two additional accessible spaces for a total number of 5 accessible spaces. 155. All the massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. Please amend the toilet facilities, changing rooms, lavatories,tubs and the showers meet to accessibility requirements of the ANSI A117.1-98. (IBC 1109.14.3) HGA Response: We submit the Wet Massage Suite #289 complies with the accessibility requirements of ANSI A117.1-98 (IBC 1109.14.3). All massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We disagree that IBC 1109.14.3 requires that ALL spa treatment rooms be accessible. IBC 1109.14 pertains to "recreational facilities". If the Spa is going to be considered a "recreational facility" then it should be considered as a whole. As such, the Spa is accessible - it provides accessibility at the entry/reception, locker rooms, toilets, showers, whirlpools, lounges, treatment rooms, etc. We submit that nothing requires ALL treatment rooms to be accessible any more than ALL lockers, ALL toilets, or ALL showers. Add grab bars at the tub in room 289 for accessibility. 167. We are unable to locate a designated accessible Type "A" condominium per Section 1107.6.2 of the 2003 IBC. As the condominiums are a different type of R-2 occupancy from the time-share units, an accessible Type "A" condominium is required. HGA Response: Since only 16 condominiums are proposed, no Type "A" units are required. Refer to IBC 1107.6.2.1.1. With the condominiums, employee housing and timeshare units there are a total of 63 units classified as an R-2 occupancy group. Per Section 1107.6.2.1.1 Type A units shall be dispersed among the various classes of units. Therefore a Type A accessible unit is required in each of the following groups: the condominiums, the employee housing, and the timeshare units. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): To resolve this issue we have revised Condo #8 (on Level 9, sheet A4.28.1)) to be a "Type A" unit per ICC/ANSI A 117.1. Two accessible employee housing units and one accessible timeshare unit are already provided and indicated on the drawings. Comment 169-180 - Submit a Memorandum of Understanding to the Town of Vail for approval by the Building Official to reference the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1. If accepted by the town, please revise entire plan to comply with the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1 in its entirety. If not accepted please revise plans per 1998 ANSI A-117.1 and comments above. 169. In the accessible units in the guest rooms of the R-1 occupancy, all bathing & toilet facilities are required to be accessible per Chapter 6 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: We submit that the accessible units include the accessible bathing and toilet facilities and comply with Chapter 6 of ANSI A117.1. Plan sheet A4.07.1 A and A4.07.1 B for Unit PR-HC shows a raised platform in media room # 116 which does not have an accessible route. Also, bathrooms/rooms # 103, # 108, # 109, # 110, # 133 do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The raised platform within Media 116 is intended to provide tiered seating within this "home theater". We submit that an accessible route is not required for this small platform as it is less than 25% of the overall room and the remainder of the room is accessible. While this room is not an "assembly" space, we submit that IBC 1108.2.4.1, exception 2 provides guidance regarding this room. See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.06.1 for Unit 2KK-HC has bathrooms/rooms # 103, # 108 which do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.05.3 for Unit 1K-HC has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.04AA for Unit ES2-HC has bathroom # 103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.01.1 for Unit K1-H1 has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Unit type K1-HI is a unit for the hearing impaired. It is not an accessible unit. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We submit that only one accessible bathroom is required within an accessible hotel unit. This requirement is consistent with the federal standard - ADAAG Chapter 9. To interpret IBC Chapter 11 as requiring that ALL bathrooms must be accessible is to raise the standard beyond the federal requirements. We submit that this is not reasonable, does not reflect industry standard, and is not the intent of the IBC / ICC. Rather, we submit that the IBC / ICC intends to coordinate and correlate with the federal standards. As an example, we can examine the accessibility requirements for condominiums. The federal standard is the FHA Fair Housing Design Manual. This document allows condo units to be provided with one "Specification B" bathroom and that is the highest level of accessibility. Similarly, the 2003 edition of ICC / ANSI A 117.1 has been revised to better correlate to FHA and require that "Type A" units provide "at least one" accessible bathroom . The common thread is the requirement is for one or "at least one" accessible bathroom - not all. Since the ADAAG, FHA Design Manual, and Al 17 (2003) all require one or "at least one" accessible bathroom it is reasonable to interpret the IBC's requirements in the same manner. Otherwise, all the hotel units would be held to a higher standard than the condominium units within the same building. 170. In Type "A" dwelling units of the R-2 occupancies, all toilet and bathing facilities must comply with Sections 1002.11.1 through 1002.11.7 of ANSI A117.1. Some Type "A" dwelling units have bathrooms which do not comply. Please clarify. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We request that ICC/ANSI A117.1 - 2003 be used as the applicable edition relative to the "Type A" condominium. This is the most recent version of A117 and our research has found that the various revisions in Chapter 10 were intended to correct the intent of various provisions and to better coordinate with federal requirements (FHA and ADA). Per 1003.11.1 of the A 117-2003, at least one bathroom is required to comply with 1003.11. This correlates with FHA requirements ("Specification B" bathrooms) and Chapter 9 of the ADA. Therefore, we submit that the latest intent of the various codes and standards is that at least one bathroom, but not all, is required to comply with 1003.11. 171. In Type "A" dwelling units, a permanent seat is required at the head end of the bathtub per Section 607 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): ICC/ANSI A117.1 - 1998, 607.3 states that a permanent seat OR a removable in-tub seat shall be provided. However, 1002.11.6, exception 1, states that the removable in-tub seat required by 607.3 is NOT required. Since 607.3 gives the option of either permanent or removable seats, we submit that the true intent of 1002.11.6, exception 1 is to NOT require either type of seat. ICC / ANSI A117.1 - 2003 carries similar language, but also includes Figure 1003.11.8 (a) to clarify that the seat (permanent or removable) can be omitted. 172. In Type "A" dwelling units, clearance in front of bathtubs shall extend the length of the bathtub and shall be 30 inches wide minimum per Section 607 of ANSI A117.1. Some of the bathtubs have lavatories encroaching into the required clearances. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required bathtub clear floor area is indicated. 173. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.11.1 of ANSI A117.1, doors shall not swing into the clear floor or ground space or clearance for any fixture, unless a clear floor space of 30 inches minimum by 48 inches minimum is located beyond the arc of the door swing. There are water closet compartments and some other bathroom areas that do not meet those requirements. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. The door swings do not swing into the other clear floor spaces. 174. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.13 of ANSI A117.1, where operable windows are provided, at least one window in each sleeping, living, or dining space shall have operable parts complying with Section 1002.13 of ANSI A117.1. All windows of "accessible units" shall comply with Section 309 of ANSI A117.1, Operable Parts. Provide documentation showing compliance. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. A note has been added to indicate requirement that all operable windows (and sliding doors) comply with 1002.13. 175. For Type "A" and "accessible units", provide details showing accessibility compliance for the operable parts of the showers, lavatory height, lavatory knee and toe clearance, and bathroom mirror height per Section 1002.11 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to interior elevations shown within the Interior Design drawings. I am unable to locate the Interior Design Drawings in the plan set submitted. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to accessibility details illustrated on sheet A0.4.3. 180. For Type "A" dwelling units, provide details showing accessibility compliance for kitchen work surfaces, sinks, range controls, and refrigerator/freezer requirements per Section 1002.12 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required kitchen features are illustrated. 183. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the condominiums, some "U" shaped kitchens do not have the required 60 inch minimum clearance between opposing base cabinets per Section 1003.12 of ANSI Al 17.1. HGA Response: Sheets A4.22.1, A4.25.1, and A4.30.1 have been revised to provide 60" clearance at U-shaped kitchens. Provide corrected plan sheets. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These sheets are included in the 7/18/07 resubmittal set. 185. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the time share units, the water closets do not have required clearances and some doors encroach required clearances per Section 1003.11.2 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Refer to the response to comment # 186 below. As such, there are no Type "B" timeshare units. See response to comment # 186. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to response to comment # 186. 186. Is Option "A" being used for the bathroom fixtures in the Type "B", Time-share units? If so, each fixture is required to meet the requirements of the option per Section 1003.11.3.1 of ANSI A 117.1. Please clarify. HGA Response: As previously discussed and resolved, the timeshare units are transient occupancy (similar to hotel units) and not residences. As such, one accessible timeshare unit is provided per IBC Table 1107.6.1.1. This accessible unit is #3103 located on Level 03. The enlarged plan for this accessible unit is on sheet A4.12.1 A and the associated H/C bathroom in 2/A4.12.2A. Provide signed letters from persons representing the operating authority for this facility stating that the timeshare units will not be used as residences. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These letters will be submitted by ownership 203. Enclose both mechanical rooms on the 9th level in 2 hour rated construction, it appears that the 2 hour shafts from below terminate in these rooms. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet M4.06 (Part Plan Attachment No. M06). The Area 3A mechanical room is unrated, and the 2 hour rated vertical risers through the building through the 8th floor slab. In order to avoid the installation of inaccessible fire dampers at the top of the riser, RYBKA have revised sheet M4.06 to ductwork is to be fire rated in the attic space. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. The Area 3B mechanical room is a 2 hour rated room that ends at column line A14. The ductwork that extends to the south across column line A 14 is 2 hour fire rated to avoid the installation of fire dampers in inaccessible locations. Fire dampers are shown in the penetrations of the two hour rated Area 3B mechanical room, where ductwork exist the mechanical room. A) The mechanical room on the 9th level over "AREA-03A"has not been addressed on the plan sheets. The partial ninth floor plan on 8 '/2" x 11" indicate wrapping ducts. If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. Ductwork is to be wrapped to provide 2 hour fire rating in attic space. (Refer to Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03). Provide architectural details rated enclosure. B) In the mechanical room labeled 911 the rated walls do not appear to enclose the room entirely. The wall is labeled 30 minutes on the north end and the wall is labeled 1 hour where Trash 912 (above "AREA-0313") is located on sheet A0.3.09. There are 3 duct penetrations in this area to be addressed, 28x10 S/E FB, 24x18 G/e FB and 24x14 S/A F/A TB. Rybka Response: Refer to Architectural Sheet A0.3.09 where Mechanical Room 911 is to be provided with 2 hour rating. Three ducts identified enter riser shaft from Mechanical Room 911 and riser is considered to be connected to and form part of mechanical room and so no fire smoke damper is provided. The ducts in question enter a shaft in the floor below within Maid Room G-711. Fire/Smoke Dampers are required where these ducts enter the shaft. One duct is not in a shaft. Please address accordingly. C) How will the 2 hour shaft assembly be maintained at EF-14 and EF-30? If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be rated for operation within rated enclosures by fan manufacturer or are to be relocated within Mechanical Room 911. Provide architectural details for the shafts. 214. Add a fire/smoke damper to the penetration by the 8x6 duct that penetrates the 30 minute fire partition on page M2.08.1 on grid line 11 and between A9 and A 10. Rybka Response: Fire dampers are not required in one hour rated fire barriers per IMC 607.5.2. (Refer to Response No. 208.) This is not a fire barrier; it is a fire partition defining a rated corridor. A fire/smoke damper is required for this duct. Rybka Response: Combination fire smoke damper is provided where this duct exits the rated shaft. The response indicates an f/s damper has been added to the duct as exits the rated shaft. A smoke damper is required where it penetrates the rated corridor. 215. Fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Rybka Response: Mechanical floor plan sheets, sheets M2.01.1 thru M2.11.1 have been revised to show: " Combination fire smoke dampers (FSD) or shunt duct* on rated shaft penetrations. " FD in duct floor penetrations when no more than three floors are penetrated, and FD on 2 hour rated wall penetrations. * shunt ducts per NFPA 90A (2002), Figure A.5.3. NFPA 90A is not an adopted document by the Town of Vail or referenced in the IMC. The review team is not familiar with the term "shunt duct". Fire smoke dampers are required at the shaft and corridor duct penetrations. (IMC 607.5.3, 607.5.4 and 607.5.5.1) Rybka Response: The 2006 IMC now calls the use of 22" upturned sheet metal ducts in 2 hour fire rated risers as 'sub ducts'. The provision of the 'sub duct' is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. The use of sub ducts on the project is shown in Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03. M2.03.1 - Remove designations for shunt ducts for the ducts run in the garage exhaust shaft. Rybka Response: EF-8, EF-43 and residential dryer exhaust have been shown terminating in a vertical areaway (garage exhaust riser) that is always being exhausted by EF-1B on emergency power. It was agreed during the June TOV plan review meeting that this condition is analogous to the 'sub duct' provisions identified earlier. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 2. In Group B and R occupancies equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 of the International Building Code, smoke dampers are not required at penetrations of shafts where kitchen, clothes, dryer, bathroom and toilet room exhaust openings with steel exhaust subducts, having a wall thickness of at least 0.019 inch (0.48 mm) extend at least 22 inches (559 mm) vertically and the exhaust fan at the upper terminus is powered continuously in accordance with the provisions of Section 909.11 of the International Building Code, and maintains airflow upward to the outdoors. The drawings are still substantially incomplete when labeling FSD's. I will attempt to identify some locations. It will be up to the design team to identify all locations. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts exit rated shafts. All drawings are indicting F.D. on the bathroom exhausts where penetrating the shaft. There is an administrative modification request to eliminate dampers on the bathroom exhausts. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FD designations at restroom exhausts have been deleted where 'sub-ducts' are provided per the administrative modification. The drawings are indicating ducts from below and ducts from above. Please create a tag for sub-ducts and clearly mark the plans on all the ducts that are to be utilizing this system. M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-301 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 2-8x6 ducts and 1-10x6 duct. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-311 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 1-8x10 duct and 1-12x6. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-301 and C-311 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the Fl-VAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - All duct penetrations through the shafts are marked F.D. These are required to be FSD. There are too many to list individually. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts penetrate rated shafts. There are multiple places that indicate FSD's where an administrative modification has been requested to utilize a 22" sub-duct. Please coordinate. M2.04.1 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-401 and C-411 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.04.1 - There is a 14x10 duct supplying corridor C-411 missing a damper designation. The duct is near A9.9 and 11/11.4. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. This duct has changed size to 12x8 since last review. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) These are just a few of the un-complying damper designations, stopped review on this correction. Again, fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Reconfiguration is still necessary. 216. Ductwork, pipes and electrical are prohibited in an exit passageways unless serving the exit passageway. It appears that above non-rated ceilings in the exit passageways the space is being used as a plenum and contains construction elements not allowed, please address all exit passageways. Rybka Response: Mechanical services not associated with exit passageways have been relocated. The review team's interpretation of IBC 1020.5 is that any ductwork serving an exit passageway shall be a completely separate system from the rest of the building and separate from all other passageways. Also, this system is required for pressurization. 1020.5 Penetrations. Penetrations into and openings through an exit passageway are prohibited except for required exit doors, equipment and ductwork necessary for independent pressurization, sprinkler piping, standpipes, electrical raceway for fire department communication and electrical raceway serving the exit passageway and terminating at a steel box not exceeding 16 square inches (0.010 m2). Such penetrations shall be protected in accordance with Section 712. There shall be no penetrations or communicating openings, whether protected or not, between adjacent exit passageways. Rybka Response: It is our understanding that only portions of the building service systems that serve the exit enclosure are allowed to penetrate the exit enclosure. We note that IBC 1019.1.3, VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURE, VENTILATION, Item .2 permits HVAC equipment (FCUs) to be located in the exit enclosure: 10 19.1.3 Ventilation. Equipment and ductwork for exit enclosure ventilation shall ....where located within the building, be separated from the remainder of the building, including other mechanical equipment, with construction as required for shafts. All ductwork serving the exit passageways shall be protected at the point of penetration of the passageway with a fire/smoke damper. The passageway is an extension of the vertical exit enclosure that it serves and lesser protection is not allowed. (1017.1) Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, and have provided FSD where make-up air ductwork penetrates the exit enclosure. M2.03. I- There is a duct termination shown in Stair Q exit enclosure, labeled "16x12 Employee Dryer T/A". This is not allowed in an exit enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been revised to show routing of dryer exhaust so that it does not pass through Stair Q. M2.04.1 - There is an 8x6 duct penetration within the exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.04.1 - There is a transfer opening 24x4 within exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization; this transfer opening is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.05.3 - There is a 6" duct shown penetrating Stair N exit enclosure. Please move out of the enclosure. (IBC 1019.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.05.3 has been revised and ductwork has been rerouted so as not to pass through Stair N. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-601 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the elevator lobby and maid's room. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-601. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 3.3/4 and A11. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - There is a duct penetration between Exit Passageway C-601 and Stair S-601. Penetrations are not allowed. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-611 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-611 is not deliberate and is to be deleted. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 and a 12x6 duct passing through Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. Grid lines 11/11.4 and A8.2/A9.9. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There is a 20x10 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-611. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 133/134.3 and BC/BD. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.2 - There is a 12x10 duct penetrating the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that Stair S-605 is connected to exit passageway C-614. and that the 'unlabeled passageway' is rated 2 hours, this upper level of the hallway is rated to provide separation between levels 4 and 5 and this portion of the ceiling space does connect to a rated vertical exit enclosure, the hallway is not an exit passageway, and that 1020.5 does not apply. M2.06.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: See previous comment. M2.07.2 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-717 are not intended to function as returns, are to be shown 'blanked-off and are provided for aesthetic reasons only. M2.07.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.3 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.08.1 and M2.08.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-803. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. Penetrations are not allowed fire wrapped or not. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. These comments are still outstanding. Tim Willings P.E. with Rybka met with the plans examiner on 8/14/07 to bring updated drawings addressing these corrections. It was advised to submit the drawings when all other comments are addressed. 222. Please address the garage exhaust on the east side of the structure that will cause a nuisance thru the casement windows (W102) in rooms 5318, 6318 and 7318. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet A2.05.2 for plan location, and sheet A0.7.2 (W 102) for window type. Architect to revise window to be fixed type. HGA Response: The architectural documents have been revised to provide fixed windows at these three locations. The architectural drawings are indicating windows W 102. This window is casement not fixed on sheet A0.7.2. Please coordinate. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Revised drawings indicating fixed windows at these locations are included with this resubmittal. Since this review, the Town of Vail has informed our review team that garage exhausts on the CO2 detectors are product-conveying outlets requiring being 10' above grade, 10' from openings into the building and 10' from property lines. The continuous fan is considered environmental, thus allowing 3' from openings and 3' from property lines. Please address accordingly. 224. Please indicate how the 18" flue from the gas ironer, on the 3rd level is routed thru the loading dock above on the 4th level. Rybka Response: Laundry gas-fired flat ironer vent leaves the laundry room at level 3 (Sheet M2.03.1) and runs vertically through the building in a rated chase with fire enclosed offsets before being vented at the roof of level 11 (Sheet M2.11.1). M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Provide architectural details for the shaft. 228. Specify on the plans the location of EC-1, Type I fan for the kitchen. Rybka Response: Sheet M4.04 has been revised to show Ecology Unit EC-1 in Ecology Room M-402A. Ecology Room M-402A as designed is a component of the grease duct enclosure. "The duct enclosure shall serve a single grease exhaust duct system and shall not contain any other ducts, piping, wiring or systems." Remove the other exhaust fans, ducting and electrical within the room not associated with the Type 1 duct. (IMC 506.3.10) Rybka Response: The 2 hour rated architectural enclosure of the Ecology unit has been reconfigured to that only the ductwork and equipment associated with the commercial kitchen exhaust is contained within the Ecology Room M-402A. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour wall and 90 minute door that is shown on the mechanical drawings. 233. Indicate on the plans that the 36" dryer duct and the 18" flue from the Ironer are in a 2 hour shaft on the 6th level, page M2.06.1. Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, the 36" dryer exhaust duct and 18" gas-fired flat ironer vent that both run horizontally at level 6 (on sheet M2.06.1) are to be in a 2-hr fire rated enclosure. M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. (from comment 224) Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour shaft walls and details for construction. Please show compliance to IBC 707.11 for the bottom of the shaft housing the 34" dryer duct. 234. Provide manufacturers instructions to verify the dryers in rooms 312 and 31 OD are capable of exhausting the developed length shown on the plans. Rybka Response: Residential dryer exhaust system shown on Sheet M2.03.1 serving Employee Laundry Room 31 OD and Valet Room 317, with quantity five (4+1) dryer exhaust connections to dryer exhaust EF-43 has been rerouted. In addition to the lint filter integral to the appliance, and auxiliary lint trap and cleanout has been shown on the common dryer exhaust duct system before the duct leaves the Employee Laundry Room 31 OD. The entire length of the residential dryer exhaust duct is to be fire wrapped to maintain clearances to combustibles. Discharge of laundry dryer exhaust is routed to exterior via connection to rated garage exhaust riser. Penetration is protected by fire wrap and minimum 22" shunt duct extended into garage exhaust riser. In addition, RYBKA have specified a laundry exhaust booster fan EF-43 which is interlocked with dryer operation. Dryer exhaust ducts are required to terminate to the outside the building and shall be equipped with a back draft damper, also clothes dryer exhaust ducts shall not extend into or through ducts or plenums. Route the dryer ducts directly to the exterior with a back draft damper. (IMC 504.4) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by showing the backdraft damper. The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 238. The Laundry Layout, page LA 1.2, indicates a flue pipe for the dry cleaner in room #317. Add the flue and the 2 hour chase to the architectural sheets and to the mechanical sheets, clarify that it does not pass through a plenum. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.03.1 to show dry cleaning machine exhaust fan EF-8 and ducted connection to outdoors. M2.03.1 - The termination is shown with a 22" sub-duct within the garage exhaust duct. This is not to the exterior as required per IMC 502.7.3.6. The review team also is concerned that when the garage exhaust is not operating the fumes from the dry cleaning can migrate to the garage. Terminate the dry cleaning exhaust to the exterior. Rybka Response: The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 244. Add a 2 hour shaft below and proper opening protection for the duct designated as 24x14 S/A F/A-24x12 S/A TB on page M2.08.1 on grid line 10A and between 10.5111. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1 and relocated the duct riser to the protected shaft in the North West corner of the Maids Room G-811. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by properly coordinating the duct offset/riser transfer shown at this level with rated shaft location or rating requirements. These two ducts that transition between shafts that are not aligned between the 8th and 9th floor levels are both to be shown enclosed in a 2 hour rated drywall enclosure, negating the need for combination fire smoke dampers, except where duct connections penetrate the shaft wall (one location). The duct on this level is indicating 24x14 S/A(supply air) F/A(from above). The 9th floor level or the enlarged M4.06 does not show this duct. Please clarify. 245. Add a 2 hour shaft or designate a fire damper for the 28x10 and the 28x14 as it passes through a 2 hour floor/ceiling assembly into the mechanical room above. On page M2.08.1 between grid lines 10.5 /11 and A8.2/A9.9. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that ducts that rise vertically through the building that are protected with two hour fire rated enclosures and are connected to a 2 hour rated mechanical room at the highest level do not have a fire damper at the floor penetration of the mechanical room. Rybka submits that the 2 hour rated shaft enclosure is an extension of the 2 hour rating of the mechanical room fire rated enclosure. There is a 24x10 duct shown penetrating the shaft connecting to the 28x10 duct within the shaft. Add the S/F damper at this location. (The architectural overlays indicate a shaft too small to house the duct?) There is a 24x18 duct shown in this vicinity penetrating the floor/ceiling above. Please address with a fire damper. 246. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 8x10 duct on page M2.07.2 between grid lines A8.2/A9.9 and 10110.5. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1. The duct has not been addressed on all levels also see comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by coordinating the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7, 8, 9 and 10 and attic levels (Sheets M2.07.2, M2.08.2, M2.09.2, M2.10.2 and M2.11.1). Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft wall (one location each occupied floor). The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands, the duct in question has been changed to 12x18 on the 7th level. 247. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 12x6 duct on page M2.07.1 between grid lines A6/A7 and on grid line 4.2. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1, M2.08.1, M209.1. This duct serving the elevator lobbies has not been addressed. Rybka Response: Rybka will coordinate the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7 in this location with level above and below. Rybka will correct this by rerouting existing ductwork through rated risers provided by HGA in these locations and Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft . The same issue as response to #246. The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands. The supply duct from level 11 to 10 has no shaft, the duct runs horizontally on the 9th level with no shaft and runs to the 7th level with fire dampers at the floors of the 8th and 9th. This duct requires a shaft. 264. Fire dampers and rated shafts for ductwork through floor/ceiling assemblies are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Refer to response to comment 215 Here are some floor penetrations by ducts that have not been addressed, please evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. M2.03.1 - 12x20 duct, grid lines A4.6 and 2.7/3 The duct in question has changed to 20x16: The vertical and horizontal shafts need to be shown on the architectural sheets. M2.03.1 - 18x14 duct, grid lines A12 and 3.3/4 The horizontal shaft shown on M2.02.1 is not shown on the architectural sheets. M2.04.1 - 16x10 duct, grid lines A13 and 3.3/4 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.04 - 12x6 duct, grid lines A10/AI I and 10.5/11 A fire damper has been added to the 2 floors above. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. M2.04 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10/AI I and 10.5/11 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. The duct is connecting more than 2 stories below the shaft. M2.04 - 6x12 duct, grid lines A 10 and 10.5 The drawings have been changed to add fire dampers at the floor line. This duct connects more than 2 stories, a shaft is required. M2.05 - 26x14 R/A, grid lines A6/A7 and 5 A fire damper is required at the floor between the 5th and 6th level. M2.05 - 12x12 paint shop exhaust, 12x12 carpenter exhaust and a 24x12 sanitary duct, grid lines A4.6 and 4/5. These ducts traverse from what appears to be a rated shaft from below through the Resid. Club Concierge Desk (512) room up through the ceiling with no protection. This duct enters a shaft on this level, add a fire damper to the duct as it enters the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.05 - 6x6, 8x6, (2)12x6 and 10x20 ducts, grid lines A10 and 10/10.5 M2.05 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10 and 10.5111 Review on duct penetrations through the floors has been stopped. The plans examiner's function is not to make a punch list for the design team. Evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that fire dampers, rated shafts and combination fire smoke dampers have been added to the floor plans in general conformance with requirements of the plan reviewer. Additional damper, combination fir dampers and shaft wall construction will be required where this drawing revision has not correctly identified that they are required. Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. Structural Conditions- The conditions listed are taken from the last comment letter dated 07/18/2007. The open issues are listed in Red. S106 F 9,11,14/S6.01 E Sheet S2.03.2: 12 ft. cantilever retaining wall extension of exterior two span wall below, outside of ballroom areaway on line A 11 between 14 and 14.5 has not been checked and appears to be overstressed for flexure, please check. Consider moment resisting joints at slab to wall connections. Design / detail planter wall. These details require rebar and splices to be shown for proper detailing and construction. Verify cantilever deflection. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S110 F S2.02.4 No calculations have been provided for the cantilevered retaining wall around the pool structure, or on gridline D1. Verify lateral load capacity, consider pedestrian surcharge and water surcharge due to site drains behind this wall as appropriate. Verify footing width. KL&A 6/26/07: Wall in question between gridlines 6-8.5 south of A 18 supports roof loads and also is the lateral load path for pool structure loading, and for roof uplift for partially enclosed structures. Wall also is monolithic with Area 3A perimeter building wall. Design is part of EOR's scope, please provide wall designs accounting for support of roof structure. KL&A 8/31/07: Coordinate new retaining wall detail 21/S4.03 with foundations shown on plan, S2.02.4. Verify new steel roof around pool structure will resist lateral soil reaction of 1.0 klf, verify metal deck shear strength and connection to resisting perpendicular retaining walls. S128 GS S2.09.3 Top slab bars l OT3 & l OT6 are shown at line 10.6/A 14. It seems these bars are shown in error as the concrete beam is upturned at this location. Beams south of line A 12.2 are not identified. Please check. IBC 1603.1. KL&A 6/26/07: Top bars also appear required at gridline A 10. S2.09.3 PT profile is incomplete, details are required. KL&A 8/31/07: Top bars are still not shown on plan, please review. S145 LS 1/S3.02C Wall thickness is shown as 8 inches. Plan 5201.2 indicates a 12" exterior foundation wall, please coordinate. KL&A 6/26/07: Coordinate reinforcing shown on shear wall elevation with 'W2'or'W3' per S2.01.2, it is unclear which wall type controls for soil lateral loading. Wall must span two way due to stair shaft opening, verify designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S164 LS S2.11 Provide detail of roof diaphragm to concrete cores. Provide or indicate detail of steel beams to concrete cores for gravity plus lateral loading, per ASCE 7-02 load combinations. Verify drag loads and chord force detailing at eave framing. Verify diaphragm welding is sufficient for expected shear forces, provide shear and moment diagram at roof deck levels. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7. KL&A 6/26/07: New detail 13/S 1.0.5B: Welded studs, thickness and dimensions of embed plate are not defined. Please provide this information for all beams and reaction conditions on the drawings. Verify connection is adequate with short slot or long slot holes in the shear tab, if permitted for erection. Provide roof diaphragm calculations per original comment. IBC 1911, 1912, 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S165 LS S2.11 Provide detail of concrete diaphragm to concrete cores, verify shear transfer at each level and comment whether any drags are required. Verify if typical details 12 & 23/S 1.0.3A apply throughout the job. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S169 LS S3.02A Calculations show a significant force reversal / back-stay effect from Level 6 to Level 5 shear force, i.e. SW 14 & SW 16. Verify this load path has been designed for the loads per 3D analysis. Verify soil plus wind / seismic loading has been used for drag design. Note per plan, S2.05.1, a large hole exists adjacent to wall SW16, and per calculations page 536, (38+57)=95k shear transfer is required. No drags are shown on plan. Please verify. Note, elevations S3.02A show #5 @ 14" o.c. at upper levels, calculations shown (2) #5 @ 24" o.c., please verify designs match calculations. IBC 1616.1.1, IBC 1604.4. KL&A 6/26/07: Original comment calculated (38+57)=95k load for SW14 not SW16 as noted, however collector bars have not been added for SW 14. SW 16 collector load is (86+143)=229k, (4) #7 shown on plan are not adequate for 229k, please review all collector designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S171 S2.11.1-2, etc. Roof framing plans are incomplete. Please address the following and confirm detailing will be provided in future drawings issues, per IBC 1604.2, 2205.1. a) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed b) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed c) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed d) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed e) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed f) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed g) W8 & W 16 eave supports do not cantilever outwards and support eave in RAM analysis submitted, instead all load is transferred directly to columns via eave rim beam. Verify eave supports and perimeter girders are adequately sized KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. h) S2.09.3, etc: HSS6x6 to W8, W 14 moment connection at eave needs a detail KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. i) 1/S2.10.3: W 16x31 on line A] 0.5 is shown as W1 8x35 per calculations, please verify all beams match calculations. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S172 I /S2.08.3 W 18x46 eave support girder near gridlines CB-C 1 is shown as W21 x44 per calculations; W 14x30 on line BE is shown as W21 x48 per calculations. Several cantilevered eave moment connection supports are shown without a backspan member. Please review. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 1/S2.08.3 Verify lateral support of the low roof structure for wind and seismic loading; low roof section is not connected to Level 8 PT slab beyond or core walls within the roof area, and braced frames are not shown. Similar at 2/S2.08.3 and other low roof structures. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 11,26,28/S7.01 A Calculations indicate that roof deck is attached to slab edge along line 2 and other locations where deck and floor slab are near the same elevation. Provide a detail for lateral roof to slab connection where required by lateral analysis. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S174 S2.11.1, etc Show roof diaphragm to concrete core connection, consider in-plane collector shear forces and out of plane anchorage forces. IBC 1604.8.2; ASCE 7, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S175 S2.11.1 Verify diaphragm continuity at dormers line A5 between upper roof deck and lower roof deck, provide collectors as required for in plane shear and out of plane shear. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S176 S2.09.2 Roof ridge support columns nearl5.5-A4.8 shown on S2.11.2 are not supported by slab below, please check. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Column in question is 20 feet tall, verify HSS5x5 is adequate, per S2.11.2. S178 A2.11.1 R, etc. Structural roof plans do not incorporate snow fences shown on architectural drawings. Please provide snow fence with adequate structural connection shear and moment associated with sliding snow. IBC 1608. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. KL&A 8/31/07: COMMENTS ON NEW DETAILS FOLLOW S187 21/54.03 Minimum depth shall be 48" for frost depth requirement. IBC 1805.2.1. Verify wall vertical rebar is adequately developed at top of footing, ACI 318, 12.2. Appears that variables D and D' are reversed with calculations variables hf and hp, please review. IBC 1806. S188 55.03 Revised beams 4138 & 4139 appear too shallow to support one way slab at ramp. Shear ties are spaced greater than d/2. Please review beam sizes for ramp loads. IBC 1604.2. Planning Department Conditions- From: Warren Cambell Submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval prior to requesting a TCO. Public Works Conditions- From: Chad Salli, Project Engineer 1. Install snowmelt in loading dock dwy. Sheet M5.15 not in resubmittal package, Sheet M5.14 shows heat in the southern half of the dwy. The dwy should be heated from the back of pan along the Frontage Rd to the trench drain. 2. The fountain entry feature shall not be public right-of-way, please remove from right-of-way. 3. The two tier retaining wall shall be designed/stamped by a Colorado registered professional engineer, greater than 4' in height from the top of wall to the bottom of the foundation. 4. Provide Final Drainage report including hydrology and hydraulic analyses (Box culvert, Storm pipe, inlets, swales, etc...). This shall include storm sewer profiles with HGL shown. A 100 yr analysis shall be completed showing no private/public property damage as a result. Provide capacity analysis for major swales and all inlets. The SCS method may be used for large mountain basins, the Rational method shall be used for the smaller site and developed basins. 5. A Developer Improvement Agreement will be required prior to release of permit. 6. Show proposed location for Comcast fiber line along the west property line. Frontage Road/Vail Road 1. Town of Vail Street lights shall be placed at 50' spacings along the project limits. Coordinate with TOV electricians for electric meter location. Relocate private lighting to private property. 2. Set back (detach) the frontage rd sidewalk 6' from back of curb east of the porte cochere exit. Sod shall be installed between the curb and walk. 3. Use attached sidewalk detail for sidewalks located within the right-of-way. 4. Use TY 13 curb inlets vs TY R where the sidewalk is attached to the curb. 5. If necessary, raise Spraddle Creek vault #I manhole to finished grade. 6. The cross-walk at the roundabout shall be asphalt thru the travel lanes and concrete only across the median. 7. Use CDOT TY 3A curb ramps at the roundabout, 6' width at the throat. 8. Storm line A shall be at I% minimum slope. Leaving the existing proposed invert elev at TY R inlet 3 and working upstream at I% appears to still allow for a min of 2' cover at the existing inlet on the north side of the frontage road. 9. Sheet E1.00, please turn off extra curb&gutter alignment. 10. Install 24" conduits to medians for irrigation and 34" conduits to the west median for future use. Spraddle Creek Drainage 1. Per previous agreement with the Town, Four-Seasons is responsible for the construction cost of continuing Spraddle Creek to STA 4+40. 2. Install an impermeable membrane around the RCP/CBC due to proposed landscaping and irrigation. 3. Please provide additional detail of proposed walls along the RCP/CBC alignment. Construction of these walls shall be designed so as not to disturb/undermine the RCP/CBC. W Meadow Drive 1. Final approval of the West Meadow Drive construction drawings will be completed in conjunction with the Town of Vail design. Modifications to tie-in grades on the Four Seasons site may be necessary to accommodate this final design. W Meadow plans shall also develop streetscape related items in the right-of-way (street lighting, landscaping, etc). 2. Storm line G alignment needs to be revised. There is not enough room to install between Spraddle Creek and a large tree on the south side of W Meadow that shall be protected. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. 3. Storm line E appears to in conflict with the recently installed water line. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. Landscaping/Irrigation 1. Detailed landscaping comments to follow within the next couple of weeks. 2. Coordinate irrigation with TOV irrigation supervisor for final head type/location and water source. 3. The Town is currently in talks with CDOT on permissible landscaping within CDOT right-of-way. Fire Department Conditions- 1. LSR, MOU's and Administrative Modifications must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protection Engineer of record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not accepted. RJA allegedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence has not been presented. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans is not accepted. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additional review. Cond: CON0010349 Sub-duct system for the dryers and range hoods is not approved. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R090001394 Amount: $180.00 10/07/200912:48 PM Payment Method: Check Init: SAB Notation: 2770-DOUG THOMPSON Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 166,552.90 This Payment: $180.00 Total ALL Pmts: 166,552.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300, PLAN CK - project GFP012 180.00 SAFE ui ti.,,. COLORADO September 25, 2009 Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Description: Bulletin 110 Thermal insulation at non-rated exterior walls with exterior stone veneer and other selected non-rated exterior walls, use of closed cell spray-applied polyurethane foam insulation. RE: PROJECT: 4 Seasons PERMIT NUMBER: B06-0196 REVISION NUMBER: 29 INTERNAL REF 10435 ADDRESS: 1 Vail Road Dear Mr. Haeberle: SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed the documents listed below for compliance in accordance with the International Codes as adopted by the Town of Vail. Bulletin 110 - Dated 09/15/09 from Hill Glazier Studio. Review Letter by Rolf Jensen & Associates - Dated September 14, 2009. The Fire-Protection- Engineer of record recommends approval of Bayseal CC Foam Insulation for use within non-rated exterior walls only. This product has not been tested for use in fire-resistive-rated exterior walls. Architectural Sheet A8.4.01 - Details sheet for thermal installation. Bayseal Technical Datasheet - dated 6/08/08 Product Datasheet and specifications. Intertek Report #3184245MID-003R1 - Dated 8/4/09, 8 pages, Test report demonstrates compliance to NFPA 259 per 2003 IBC, section 2603.5.3. Intertek Report # 3184245SAT-001 B - Dated 8/20/09 45 pages, test report demonstrates compliance to NFPA 285 per 2003 IBC section 2603.5.5. SAFEbuilt recommends approval of this submittal with the following condition: Page 1 of 2 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov_B06- 0196 Rev29 IR10435 FAL finalfinal.doc ft. The current submittal does not indicate which walls are fire-resistive rated and which are not. The approved documents do not indicate where any non-rated wall assemblies are located. Provide a key plan identifying all non-rated exterior wall assemblies to be fitted with this new spray-applied thermal insulation. This has been discussed with the current contractor of record's representative, Doug Thompson of Hyder Construction. Under no condition can the spray-applied thermal insulation manufactured by Bayseal be installed within fire-resistance rated wall assemblies until appropriate test information (ASTM E-119) has been submitted and reviewed. This is also noted within the Fire-Protection-Engineer of records letter dated September 14, 2009. This condition has been recorded as a "red-line" condition upon architectural sheet A8.4.01. We also recommend a review be performed by both the Fire Department and the Town's Building Official to determine if this submittal is acceptable as the authority having jurisdiction. Plan review fee: 3 Hours No additional square footage- No added valuation Sincerely, Eric Pendley Building Official/Plans Examiner SAFEbuilt Colorado eric. pendley(kS AFEbuilt. com Page 2 of 2 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov_B06- 0196 Rev29 IR10435 FAL finalfinal.doc HKS Transmittal Ship Via Date Project Name Project No. Hand Delivered 9/22/2009 Four Seasons Resorts - Vail 11247000 r%u;r Of Vail nip REVIEWED To Martin Haeberle Town of Vail Chief Building Official Director of Community Dev. 75 South Frontage Rd. Vail CO 81657 Phone 970.479.2142 FAX rages of D ~ C HV SEP 2 2 2009 TOWN OF VAIL Subject Four Seasons Vail #11247.000; Bulletin #110 Thermal insulation at non-rated exterior walls. Description PRJ 03-0468; B06-0196 SEP 2 ~ 2009 SAFEbuilt Please find attached four (4) signed and sealed sets of Bulletin #110 Thermal insulation at non-rated exterior walls with exterior stone veneer and other selected non-rated exterior walls, See attached bulletin for complete description and list of supporting attachments. We respectfully request your review and approval of this item. Please let us know if you have any additional questions or requests that we may be able to assist you with. If you have questions, please call me at 970-476-7849 or 813-416-0687. Thank you. John H. Curtis, HKS Inc. HKS-Hill Glazier Studio Sent By John Curtis cc M. Rossi, S. Miller ARI'ROVED*~ Subject to Inspection and Compliance to all relevant Adopted Building and Municipal Codes. Chan in Pjaan~M BST a bt/1 t Date Code og SAFEbuilt Colorado f:ieoutm CugQa R u "Il"W .a 0" ExK~ l.al_ t..")ftL q~S 3c.t S d7ESt~a-1W'r~t0 AS "tIJcW ertnF4 ►45~SE~Nt%3~-tl E S P0&?05fE;0 S,P P,Aq - qAOLACD -rwe Aift_ HKS HILL GLAZIER STUDIO BULLETIN PROJECT: Four Seasons Resort at Vail ARCHITECT'S Vail, Colorado BULLETIN 110 OWNER: Black Diamond Resort - Vail, LLC DATE OF Vail Development 09, LLC OF col ISSUANCE: 09/15/09 Barclays Capital Real Estate 200 Park Avenue C~ C N C. ~ H o New York, NY 10017 212 412 1 7~1 >0 cJ ( ) - 664 X13//il NO . ARCHITECT: HKS Inc, -2765 Hill Glazier Studio 925 Alma Street / Palo Alto, CA 94301 AR PROJECT 1 1 247 / 02028 Description: Item #1 - Thermal insulation at non-rated exterior walls with exterior stone veneer and other selected non-rated exterior walls. - As requested by Ownership, apply closed-cell spray polyurethane foam insulation within all non-fire rated exterior walls that are clad with exterior stone veneer and other selected non-fire rated exterior walls. Remove fiberglass batt insulation previously installed at these locations and replace with Bayer Bayseal CC. Conform to all manufacturer's installation instructions. Refer to attached review letter by RJA, drawing sheet A8.4.01, product data, Intertek Report # 3184245MID-003R1, and Intertek Report # 3184245SAT-001 B. Attachments: (List attached documents that support description) Review letter by RJA, dated 9/14/09, 2 pages. Architectural drawing sheet: A8.4.01, dated 8/24/09. Indicates compliance with thermal barrier requirements included in IBC 2603.5.2 and 2603.5.7. Product Data: Technical Datasheet by Bayer Material Science for Bayseal CC, dated 6/10/08, 2 pages. Indicates compliance with flame spread and smoke development indices required by IBC 2603.5.4 Intertek Report # 3184245MID-00381: Test report demonstrating compliance with NFPA 259 as required by IBC 2603.5.3., 8 pages, dated 8/4/09. Intertek Report # 3184245SAT-001 B: Test report demonstrating com lia LIAM fi Q8 0Ys r by IBC 2603.5.5., 45 pages, dated 8/20/09. End of Bulletin 2J i SAFEbuilt Colorado ROLE JENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. FIRE PPOTEC'TION CONSULTANTS September 14, 2009 VIA EMAIL: datmore(c~hksinc.com Mr. Doug Atmore Hill Glazier Architects 925 Alma Street Palo Alto, California 94304 5460 SW h Quebec Street Stwte 370 Gc awMd V&)ge,00 80111 USA www,r4ic.corn +1303573-7848 Fac +13M73.7843 FOUR SEASONS VAIL - USE OF BAYER BAYSEAL CC FOAM INSULATION Dear Doug: You have requested that Rolf Jensen & Associates, Inc (RJA) evaluate the use of Bayer Bayseal CC Foam insulation for use in non-rated exterior wall construction at the Vail Four Seasons project for compliance with the 2003 International Building Code (IBC) as adopted by the Town of Vail and with our Life Safety Report, dated May 22, 2007. In accordance with the manufacturer's product description: "Bayseal CC closed-cell spray applied polyurethane foam is a two component, medium-density, structural insulation system designed for commercial, residential, and industrial applications." The purpose of this evaluation is to determine the applicability of substituting this material where fiberglass batt insulation has previously been specified for use in exterior walls. The Four Seasons Vail is a Type I-B, 10 story hotel/condominium building and requires non-combustible construction throughout in accordance with IBC Chapter 6. Foam plastics are permitted within Type I and II construction in accordance with IBC Section 603.1, item 3, which directs the user to Chapter 26 of the Code. IBC Section 2603.5 describes the specific requirements for the use of foam plastic within exterior walls of buildings of any height. Specifically for a Type I, II, III or IV building, exterior walls must: a) Pass the ASTM E-119 test for walls required to be fire-resistance rated; b) Have a thermal barrier between the foam plastic and the interior; c) Have a potential heat as tested in accordance with NFPA 259 equal to or lower than the assembly tested by NFPA 285; d) Have a flame spread and smoke developed of 25 and 450 or e) Pass the NFPA 285 test standard; f) Bear the approval of a listing agency; and reRD BY SEP 2 5 MIS g) Shall not exhibit sustained flaming in accordance with NFPA 24L.Jg permit omission of this requirement with protection, e.g. thermal barrier). © 2009 Rolf Jensen & Associates, Inc. All Rights Reserved Ili an X11111111111 a so was amoi snom FOUR SEASONS VAIL Page 2 - V31063 USE OF BAYER BAYSEAL CC FOAM INSULATION September 14, 2009 HKS Hill Glazier Studio submitted Architect's Bulletin #110 to RJA on September 4, 2009 for review of the Bayseal CC product for substitution as an exterior wall insulation material within non-fire rated exterior walls of the project. The submittal included: • Architectural drawing Sheet A8.4.01 dated 8/24/09 • Product Data Sheet from Bayer Material Science for the Bayseal CC, dated 6/10/08; • Intertek Report #3184245MID-003R1 test report demonstrating testing in accordance with testing standard NFPA 259, dated 8/4/09; and • Intertek Report #3184245SAT-001 B test report demonstrating compliance with testing standard NFPA 285, dated 8/20/09. The use of spray applied foam must be carefully evaluated to assure that it will not contribute to the vertical and horizontal spread of fire across the exterior surface of the building. This is especially true in light of the fact that the project has already gained approval to used limited quantities of wood trim where the Code would typically not permit the use of any wood above 15 feet. In this case, the exterior surface of the building is covered with cement fiber board, masonry, cement plaster, and where wood trim is applied directly to the exterior wall, a 1 inch fire cement spacer is included. Interior sides of exterior walls are finished with 5/8 inch Type "X" gypsum board where insulated metal stud walls are used. Upon review of the documents provided, we find that the Bayseal CC foam insulation product meets all the requirements of IBC Section 2603.5 for use within non-fire resistance rated exterior walls and that it will not appreciably contribute to exterior fire spread due to exterior wall finishes. We understand that the manufacturer is pursuing ASTM E-119 testing and that results are forthcoming. If the results of this testing demonstrate successful completion, please provide RJA with appropriate documentation for our continued evaluation of the product within fire resistance rated wall assemblies. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns regarding this review. Yours truly, ROLF JENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Sean Donohue, PE, LE ber 14. 2009 Date V31063/Four Seasons BAYSEAL FOAM eval 09-14-09 REVIEWED BY ESEP 2 5 2009 ~ x SAFEbuilt Colorado flit ~~y~ ~ s t~ y E } ! )a.~~ii=B6 '(.."IBC Product Description Bayseal CC closed-cell spray applied polyurethane foam is a two component, medium-density, structural insulation system designed for commercial, residential, and industrial applications. Closed-cell polyurethane foam yields a high R-value and minimizes air and moisture infiltration. The spray applied nature of Bayseal SPF systems allows for tremendous sealing properties which contributes to healthier homes and workplaces. The rigid nature of Bayseal CC increases overall structural integrity resulting in more durable structures. Bayseal CC expands during application to provide increased performance values by sealing the building envelope. The Bayseal CC system is comprised of an "A" component or aromatic diisocyanate manufactured by Bayer MaterialScience, and a blended "B" component which includes polyols, fire retarding materials, catalysts and non- ozone depleting blowing agents. Recommended Uses -Walls •Unvented Attics -Ceilings -Floors -Vented Attics -Piping •Unvented Crawl Spaces -Vented Crawl Spaces -Foundations -Concrete Slabs -Ducts -Tanks -Cold Storage -Freezers -Coolers Properties Test Method Value Fungi Resistance: ASTM G-21 Zero Rating R-Value (aged): ASTM C518 6.9 per inch R-13 at 1.9 inches 24 at 3.5 inches R-19 at 2.75 inches 37.8 at 5.5 inches 54.3 at 7.9 inches Sound Transm ssion Coeffiaent ASTM E-9M51E413 43 (STC) Nose Reduction Coefrlcient ASTM C423 0.2_(NRC) Compressive Strength: ASTM D-1621 1520 psi Core Density: ASTM D-1622 1.9 IbsM Closed Cell Content ASTM D-2856 >921/6 Tensile Strength: ASTM D-1623 55 - 65 psi Moisture Vapor Transmission (perrneance): ASTM E-96 0.80 Perms at 1" 0.23 Perms at 3.5" 0.14 Perms at 5.5" 0.10 Perms at 7.9" Dimensional Stability: ASTM D-2126 (7 days at 158°F, 95%RH) % Change in Volume 6% 4 Leakage Rate: ASTM E-283 0.00 t 0.01(Usymz Bayseal`r" 'CC Div. 7-Thermal and Moisture Protection Closed-Cell Insulation Technical Datasheet: 06/10/08 Environmental Consideration and Substrate Temperatures Applicators must recognize and anticipate climatic conditions prior to application to ensure highest quality foam and to maximize yield. Ambient air and substrate temperatures, moisture, and wind velocity are all critical determinants of foam quality. Extreme ambient air and substrate temperature will influence the chemical reaction of the two components, directly affecting the yield, adhesion and the resultant physical properties of the foam insulation. To obtain optimum results, Bayseal CC should be spray-applied to substrates when ambient air and surface temperatures are between 50eF and 1201F. All substrates to be sprayed must be free of dirt, soil, grease, oil and moisture prior to the application of Bayseal CC. Moisture in any form: excessive humidity (>85%R.H.) rain, fog, or ice will react chemically will adversely affect system performance and corresponding physical properties. Application should not take place when the ambient temperature is within 50F of the dew point. Wind velocities in excess of 12 miles per hour may result in excessive loss of exotherm and interfere with the mixing efficiency of the spray gun affecting foam surface texture, cure, physical properties and will cause overspray. Precautions must be taken to prevent damage to adjacent areas from fugitive overspray. Processing Parameters Store at 651 to 85eF in a dry and well-ventilated area. Material in containers should be maintained at 650F to 75OF while in use. Heated trailers, hotboxes, or heated tank storage may be necessary. Material temperature should be confirmed with a thermometer or IR gun. (continued) Pre-heater Temperature: "A" and "B" 125.135°F Hose Temperature: "A" and "B" 125.135°F Pressures: 1000-1400 psi (dynamic)` Mix Rata: 1 to 1 by volume "A" to "B" Viscosity at 75°F: 400.500 cps"B" Component Surface Temperature: 50-120°F Cream Time at 75°F: 2-3 seconds Tads Free Time at 75°F: 7-8 seconds Cure Time at 75°F: 4 tours `DW.dat lq= hose Lro Test values were generated from laboratory samples and actual properties may vary with equipment and application conditions.. REVIEWED 19V SEP 2 5 ZOU9 SAFEbuilt Colorado TNt Credentials/Certifications Bayseal CC is a Class I formulation, as set forth under Underwriters Laboratories ASTM E-84 (UL 723, NFPA 255, UBC Standard 8-1). Processing Equipment continued) 2:1 transfer pumps are recommended for material transfer from container to the proportioner. The plural component proportioner must be capable of supplying each component within t 2% of the desired 1:1 mixing ratio by volume. Hose heaters should be set to deliver 1250F to 135 IF materials to the spray gun. These settings will ensure thorough mixing in the spray gun mix chamber in typical applications. Optimum hose pressure and temperature will vary with equipment type and condition, ambient and substrate conditions, and the specific application. Some equipment may require you to heat drums to achieve optimum material temperature. It is the responsibility of the applicator to properly interpret equipment technical literature, particularly information that relates acceptable combinations of gun chamber size, proportioner output, and material pressures. The relationship between proper chamber size and the capacity of the proportioner's re-heater is critical. Contact your local BaySystems representative for specific recommendations, pricing, and availability of spray and auxiliary equipment. CAUTION: Extreme care must be taken when removing and reinstalling drum transfer pumps so as NOT to reverse the "A" and "B" components. Thermal Barrier IRC and IBC codes require that SPF be separated from the interior of a building by a an approved fifteen (15) minute thermal barrier, such as 1/2" gypsum walr board or equivalent, installed per manufacturer's instructions and corresponding code requirements. There are exceptions to the thermal barrier requirement: (1) Code authorities may approve coverings based on fire tests specific to the SPF application. For example, covering systems that successfully pass large scale tests may be appproved by code authorities in lieu of a thermal barrier; (2) SPF protected by 1" thick masonry does not need a thermal barrier. Certain materials that offer protection from ignition, called "ignition barriers," may not be considered as thermal barrier alternatives unless they comply with NFPA 286. Applicators should request test data and code body approvals or other written indications of acceptability under the code to be sure that the product selected offers code-compliant protection. Applicators should ensure the safety of the obsite and construction personnel by posting appropriate signs warning that a"~ "hot work" such as welding, soldering, and cutting with torches should take place no less than 35 feet from any exposed foam. If "hot work" must be performed all spray polyurethane foam should be covered with an appropriate fire or welder's blanket, and a fire watch should be provided. Vapor Retarder Bayseal CC qualifies as a vapor retarder as defined by the International Code Council and ASHRAE (class lI) at a minimum thickness of 1 inch. Building construction types with a persistent, high moisture drive require additionar moisture remediation, as local building codes dictate. This is induding climate zones 5 and higher in the U.S., as defined in 2004 Supplement to the IRC, Table N1101.2. Per Pass Application Applicators should limit Bayseal CC thickness to 3" per pass for optimal processing and physical properties. Second passes if necessary should be applied after 10 minutes of cure time. If additional passes are needed, applicators should wait 30 minutes between passes for optimal foam processing. Handling and Safety Respirafory protection is MANDATORY! Contact Bye er MaterialScience for a copy of the Model Respiratorryy Protection Program veloped by API or visit their website at www.polyurethane.org. Avoid contact with skin, eyes, and clothing. Open containers carefully, allowing any pressure to be relieved slowly and safely. Wear chemical safety goggles and rubber gloves when handling or working with these materials. In case of eye contact, immediately flush with large amounts of water for at least fifteen minutes, consult a physician immediate) . In case of skin contact, wash area with soap and water. Wash clothes before reuse. Fire Hazard Fires involving either of these components may be extinguished with carbon dioxide, dry chemical, or inert gas. Application of large quantities of water East otffro w %t 0111CE, Fa* Surface Burning Characteristics ASTM Method E84 (UL 723) Class I NOTE: The flame spread rating Flame Spread <25 is not intended to reflect hazards presented by this Smoke Development :5450 or any other material un- der actual fire conditions. Nominal Thickness (Inches) 4.0 spray is recommended for spill fires. Personnel fighting the fire must be equipped with NIOSH approved self-contained breathing apparatus. Cleaning of Spills or Leakage Cover the area with an inert absorbent material such as clay or vermiculite and transfer to metal waste containers. Saturate with water but do not seal the container with the isocyanates and water mixture. The area should then be flushed with large amounts of water, in the case of the "B" component, or a 5% aqueous ammonia, in the case of the "A" component. Dispose of these materials in compliance with federal, state and local regulations. Caution: Isocyanates will react with water and generate carbon dioxide. This could result in rupture of closed containers. Disclaimer The data presented herein is not intended for use by nonprofessional applicators, or those persons who do not purchase or utilize this product in the normal course of their business. The potential user must perform any pertinent tests in order to determine the product's performance and suitability in the intended application, since final determination of fitness of the product for any particular use is the responsibility of the buyer. All guarantees and warranties as to products supplied by Bayer MaterialSdence shall have only those guarantees and warranties expressed by the manufacturer. The buyer's sole remedy as to any material claims will be against the manufacturer of the product. The aforementioned data on this product is to be used as a guide and is subject to change without notice. The information herein is believed to be reliable, but unknown risks may be resent NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING PATENT WARRANTIES OR WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR USE ARE MADE BY Bayer MaterialScience WITH RESPECT TO PRODUCTS OR INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREIN. Nothing contained herein shall constitute a permission or recommendation to practice any invention covered by a patent without a license from the owner of the patent. Accordingly, buyer assumes all risks whatsoever as to the use of these materials and buyer s exclusive remedy as to any breach of warranty, negligence, or other claim shall be limited to the purchase price of the materials. Failure to adhere to any recommended procedures shall relieve Bayer MaterialSdence and the manufacturer of all liability with respect to the materials and their use thereof. REVIEWED BY SAFEbuilt Colorado 3 REPORT NUMBER: 3184245MID-003R1 ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: July 28, 2009 REVISED DATE: August 4, 2009 H 0 a W W 1- REVIEWED 8Y S L EE 2 r 20 SAFEbuilt Colorado "This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client. Intertek's responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to permit copying or distribution of this report and then only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The observations and test results in this report are relevant only to the sample tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product, or service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program. " EVALUATION CENTER Intertek 8431 Murphy Drive Middleton, WI 53562 RENDERED TO Bayer Material Sciences LLC 2400 Spring Stuebner Road Spring, Texas 77389 PRODUCT EVALUATED: Bayseal CC EVALUATION PROPERTY: NFPA 259 Report of Testing of Bayseal CC for compliance with the applicable requirements of the following criteria: NFPA 259, 2008 Edition, Standard Test Method for Potential Heat of Building Materials s- Intertek Bayer Materials Science LLC August 4, 2009 3184245MID-003R1 Page 2 of 8 1 Table of Contents 1 Table of Contents .....................................................................................................2 2 Introduction 3 3 Test Samples 3 3.1. SAMPLE SELECTION 3 3.2. SAMPLE AND ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTION 3 4 Testing and Evaluation Methods 3 4.1. TEST STANDARD 1 3 4.1.1. Deviation from Standard Method 4 5 Testing and Evaluation Results ............._........5 5.1. RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS ....................................................................5 5.2. EXAMINATION OF RESULTS 5 6 Conclusion 6 REVIEWED 6Y SAFEbuilt Colorado tntertek Bayer Materials Science LLC 3184245MID-003R 1 2 Introduction August 4, 2009 Page 3 of 8 Intertek has conducted testing for Bayer Materials Science LLC, on Bayseal CC, to evaluate the potential heat using an oxygen bomb calorimeter. Testing was conducted in accordance with NFPA 259, 2008 Edition, Standard Test Method for Potential Heat of Building Materials. This evaluation began July 27, 2009 and was completed July 28, 2009. 3 Test Samples 3.1. SAMPLE SELECTION Foam raw materials were prepared under UL; third party selected raw materials prepared under witness of Mr. Carlos Santibanez of UL. Foam specimen were manufactured under witness of Mr. Anthony Mendoza of Intertek. Samples were submitted by Bayer Materials Science LLC manufacturing facility, located at 2925 Galleria Drive, Arlington, TX 76011 for testing to Intertek San Antonio. Samples were submitted to Intertek Middleton directly from Intertek San Antonio. Samples were received at the Evaluation Center on July 27, 2009 in good condition. 3.2. SAMPLE AND ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTION Bayseal CC is semi-rigid foam insulation. The samples were received at the evaluation center in good condition. 4 Testing and Evaluation Methods 4.1. TEST STANDARD 1 Using the dry samples the potential heat of Bayseal CC was determined in accordance with NFPA 259 2008 Edition. The samples were conditioned 24 hours in an environment being maintained at 23 ± 12C and 50 ± 5 percent relative humidity. Following the conditioning, the samples were ground so that approximately a one gram sample may be pressed into a pellet for the Oxygen Bomb Calorimeter test. A specimen was also cut in a rectangular form 13mm ± 3mm x 19mm ± 3mm x 64mm ± 13mm to be used in the Electric Muffle Furnace test procedure. The samples crucible and then placed in a preheated muffle furnace at 7509C for two o into the crucible during the entire test. The mass of the residue was re rfedafter the s le was cooled in a desiccator. If the mass was more than 5% of the initial m Ai5=s co mbined with a combustion promoter and the oxygen bomb test was pr fo SAFEbuilt Colorado tntertek Bayer Materials Science LLC 3184245MID-003R1 4.1.1. Deviation from Standard Method There were no deviations from the standard methoc REVIEWED RAP SEP 2 5 20d SAFEbuilt Colorado rnt~ e- rtekj Bayer Materials Science LLC 3184245MID-003R1 5 Testing and Evaluation Results 5.1. RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS Ox en Calorimeter Sam le Btu/1b Ba seal CC 11787.239 Ba seal CC 11423.954 Average 11605.596 Muffle Furnace % Residue Sam le Remaining Ba seal CC p 5.2. EXAMINATION OF RESULTS The potential heat of the Bayseal CC foam was determined using the oxygen bomb calorimeter. The muffle furnace test produced no residue results therefore the heat of combustion of the previous oxygen calorimeter test was valid. The potential heat for Bayseal CC was found to be 11605.596 BTU/Ib or 26989.742 kJ/Kg. REVIEWED BY ESEA' 2 5 Zt!U SAFEbuilt Colorado Intertek' Bayer Materials Science LLC 3184245MID-003R1 6 Conclusion August 4, 2009 Page 6 of 8 Intertek has conducted testing for Bayer Materials Science LLC on Bayseal CC spray foam, to evaluate the potential heat using an oxygen bomb calorimeter. The potential heat of the Bayseal CC spray foam was determined using the oxygen bomb calorimeter. The muffle furnace test produced no residue results thus the test of the residue to be combined in with a combustion promoter was not required. Therefore the potential heat was the value determined by the oxygen bomb calorimeter test. The conclusions of this test report may be used as part of the requirements for Intertek product certification. Authority to Mark must be issued for a product to become certified. INTERTEK Reported by: Mark Crawford Chemist, Verification Center Reviewed by: Stewart Relyea Chemist, Intertek Middleton REVIEWED BY SEP 2 5 sAFEbuilt Colorado lntertek Bayer Materials Science LLC 3184245MID-003R1 Appendix A Equipment List 1. Parr 1271 Bomb Calorimeter Equipment Number: 1042 Calibrated before use 2. Mettler Toledo Scale Equipment Number: 1045 Calibration Due: Feb-10 3. Envirotronics USA Environmental Chamber Equipment Number: 784 Calibration Due: Feb-10 August 4, 2009 Page 7of8 REVIEWED BY SP 2 2h,4 sAFEbuiIt Colorado ~Intertek Bayer Materials Science LLC 3184245MID-003R1 REVISION SUMMARY DATE SUMMARY Jul 28, 2009 Original Date of I: August 4, 2009 Split report b sample, add sample witn REVIEWED} BY ES E P 2 55 22 00 SAFEbuilt Colorado REPORT NUMBER: 3184245SAT-001 B ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: August 20, 2009 REVISED DATE: NA H O am W X H Cf) W H EVALUATION CENTER 16015 Shady Falls Road Elmendorf, TX 78112 (voice) 210-635-8100 (fax) 210-635-8101 www.intertek-etisemko.com RENDERED TO Bayer Material Science, LLC BaySystems Spray Insulation & Roofing Material PO Box 1509 SPRING TX 77383 PRODUCT EVALUATED: BaysealTm CC (Closed Cell) Spray Foam Insulation EVALUATION PROPERTY: Fire Resistance Report of Testing Bayseal CC Spray Foam Insulation for compliance with the applicable requirements of the following criteria: NFPA 285, Standard Fire Test Method for Evaluation of Fire Propagation Characteristics of Exterior Non-Load-Bearing Wall Assemblies Containing Combustible Components, 2006 Edition REVIEWED BY HP 2 i Ng SAFE ;Gilt Colorado This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client. Intertek's responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to copy or distribute this report and then only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The observations and test results in this report are relevant only to the sample tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product, or service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program. Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 1 Table of Contents August 20, 2009 Page 2 of 45 ITEM PAGE 1 Table of Contents 2 2 Introduction 3 3 Test Samples 3 4 Testing and Evaluation Methods 3 5 Testing and Evaluation Results 4 6 Conclusions 5 Appendices Appendix A: Assembly Drawings 7 Appendix B: Temperature Data 10 Appendix C: Photographs 31 Revision Summary / Last Page of Report 45 REVIEWS- @y SEF 2 ?UuJ SAFEbuilt Colorado Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 2 Introduction August 20, 2009 Page 3 of 45 Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc. (Intertek) has conducted testing for Bayer Material Science, LLC, on BaysealTm CC (Closed Cell) Spray Foam Insulation, to evaluate fire resistance. Testing was conducted in accordance with the applicable requirements of NFPA 285, Standard Fire Test Method for Evaluation of Fire Propagation Characteristics of Exterior Non-Load- Bearing Wall Assemblies Containing Combustible Components, 2006 Edition. This evaluation took place on August 19, 2009. 3 Test Samples 3.1. SAMPLE SELECTION Samples were submitted to Intertek directly from the client. Samples were not independently selected for testing by Intertek personnel. However, the samples were marked with a batch number, date and signature and were, per the client, witnessed by a third party agency. Samples were received at the Evaluation Center on July 1, 2009. 3.2. SAMPLE AND ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTION According to their website, Bayer Material Science's Bayseal CC closed-cell spray applied polyurethane foam is a two-component, medium-density, structural insulation system designed for commercial, residential and industrial applications. Intertek technicians constructed an 18' high X 14' wide curtain wall unit of 3 5/8", 20GA steel studs, spaced 24" o.c., secured with '/z" self tapping screws. A 78" wide X 30" high window opening was located in the center of the lower portion of the test assembly, in compliance with the standard (see Appendix A). A layer of 5/8" DensGlase Exterior Sheathing was installed over the exterior side and secured to the studs with 1%" self tapping screws spaced 8" o.c. around the perimeter and 12" o.c. in the field.. On August 29, 2009 representatives from Bayer Material Science, LLC sprayed the Bayseal CC closed-cell polyurethane (density 2.0 pcf) into the cavities between the studs, filling them to approximately half-depth. A layer of 5/8" Type X gypsum wallboard was installed on the interior surface, with the long seams perpendicular to the studs and secured with 1%" self tapping screws spaced 8" o.c. around the perimeter and 12" o.c. in the field. All seams and exposed fasteners on the wallboard side received a Level 2 finish. 4 Testing and Evaluation Methods The assembly was secured to the test laboratory's Apparatus (ISMA) using ceramic fiber insulation between was instrumented with 24 GA. Tvoe K. Fiberalass Jackei Intermediate-Scale, MLU-s them to create an effective LE _V _1F_0 _ED -BY TsA Cftredc. Bayer Material Science, LLC August 20, 2009 Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B Page 4 of 45 The output of the 54 thermocouples and the furnace probes was monitored by a 100-channel Yokogawa, Inc., Darwin Data Acquisition Unit. The computer was programmed to scan and save data every 15 seconds. Following the test, the files were imported into MS Excel for tabular and graphical display (presented in Appendix B). 4.1. TEST STANDARD Testing of BaysealTm CC Spray Foam Insulation was conducted in accordance with the applicable requirements of NFPA 285, Standard Fire Test Method for Evaluation of Fire Propagation Characteristics of Exterior Non-Load-Bearing Wall Assemblies Containing Combustible Components, 2006 Edition. 5 Testing and Evaluation Results 5.1. RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS The test was initiated on August 19, 2009. Jose Luna from Bayer Material Science, LLC and Art Parker, from Hughes Associates, Inc. were present to witness the test. The ambient temperature and humidity at the time were 82OF and 61% RH, respectively. The Maximum TC Limits, established by the initial thermocouple temperatures and the test standard, are presented in the following table: Location TCs Max TC Limit Exterior Surface 11,14-17 1000°F Core 18 -19; 28, 31 - 40 8381F; 838 OF 2" floor Interior Surface 49 - 54 5890F The observations made during the test are listed below: Time min:sec Observation from the Exterior 0:00 The test was initiated at 8:15 A.M. 1:20 Flames projected out the window from ignition of the wallboard paper on the furnace side of the sample 2:10 The wallboard paper was consumed and the flames receded 5:00 The window burner was ignited 6:30 The surface was discoloring above the window 16:00 Flame tips from the burn room were projecting out the window at the header 19:00 The wallboard along the header was cracking and buckling 26:00 The drywall header began to fall 28:45 There were flames from the window sill 30:00 The burners were extinguished; flames continued around the window 35:00 Smoke continues; there is glowing at the joint 2' above the window 40:00 The test was terminated ti N Bayer Material Science, LLC August 20, 2009 Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B Page 5 of 45 Time min:sec Notes from the 2 Floor Observation Room 2:41 Smoke entered the room from the bottom left of the sample 10:21 The room was filled with smoke 15:04 Some moisture dripped from the to of the sample 16:11 The level of smoke was increasing 33:35 There was a pooping sound 35:05 The room was so smoky, could not see the to of the wall Flames on the exterior panels were within the established limit (10' above the top of the window, 5' beyond the side of the window); there were no flames that spread through the core components or infiltrated the second story room; none of the thermocouples exceeded their maximum limits. 6 Conclusion On August 19, 2009 Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc. (Intertek) conducted testing for Bayer Material Science, LLC, on BaysealM CC (Closed Sell) Spray Foam Insulation, to evaluate fire resistance. Testing was conducted in accordance with the applicable requirements of NFPA 285, Standard Fire Test Method for Evaluation of Fire Propagation Characteristics of Exterior Non-Load-Bearing Wall Assemblies Containing Combustible Components, 2006 Edition. Based on the data from this test the on BaysealTm CC Spray Foam Insulation met the requirements of the 30-minute test. The conclusions of this test report may not be used as part of the requirements for Intertek product certification. Authority to Mark must be issued for a product to become certified. Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES NA, INC. L)-Id- JZ1r--b Tested by: Joseph Zatopek Test Engineer Reported by: Reviewed by: Michael A Brown Technical Writer ti~ Mike Dey Engineering Manager, Fire Resistance August 20, 2009 Page 6 of 45 - REVIEWED By SAP' 2 5 an SAFEbuilt Colorado Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B APPENDIX A Assembly Drawings August 20, 2009 Page 7 of 45 RERE IEWED BY SEP 2 `'i ZOON~~ SAFEbuilt Colorado Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B Steel Framing r-0- 2'-0` 2'-0` Z-W 2'4- r4- 2'-0' 0 co 0 N 6'-6 N Note: The wall was framed using 20 GA galvanized steel studs spaced 24" o.c. and fastened to top and bottom 20 GA galvanized steel track, using 1/2" long self tapping screws at each location. August 20, 2009 Page 8 of 45 INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B Bayer Material Science LLC Steel Fr ming EylmEWF® SEA' Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 1 l 0& 10 mwy Ltnmas O") I [7J (t i2 am1) 1 ~ i s ~ 4'03rvnt: 1 t1 a x010 nsnl' 30 in (742 ay"i~ i )0 R Rb2 Rinit i .L_ August 20, 2009 Page 9 of 45 1,11inionm wat •tl21 13 t t in tl or; m)-~ ~tlrivn i cQOti a031n; N14 'L}S /3~7I tt+} 1I J4 - 0411 1SYi 1cht,lsor1411 144 0 18021 0 7 t t trU r. 0 Nlon1m/780!4 O J~Xtsj 3Y t so ?3 0 ~ y5) 3 b) x t @O.V ..O r Y Isis?, `0 t~ - • .'ll ~ Itgtri coal - ~ Qi1111C1PM Mtjh -s t04pDtfal ~2naln i017wn. 111 ails) Exterior wall 111 1W an) } 1 8 tJ4: ara) tih t1:2'e17+, t,;GnClp6p ItJC► M.s1 is -Thermocouples 1" from exterior wall surface o - In core/air space 13r4r%1406s11 k 7841+1 7tbrn 711an 7U4 in .-Y e~ allen ll 1813mmi (413rtm) t711on4 V ss ►~--rr~- s V 'w a _ I tt ,y 8 8 I3 8 sn . 2t In ' f 211 1•_.0+---w 21 1410 tM1) y,. t6t0+~1~ ta7 •pI08~1 A? to 1762mvi Y11►rUw h ?gin (lost an) K1 3o in 1701 twari tA.n ►eM "Am 101(30s atl ttnaanl bm (15?reel f0a t.YVrl• 1;A, t Q 1305 mnt r8n (tf.2~1 . f t 013176 ne+t J. 1 a UIY l.fl) is -Thermocouples 1" from exterior wall surface Interior view of Exterior wall w,,,.REVIEWEE) " f SAFEbuilt Colorado Source: NFPA 285, Standard Fire Test Method for Evaluation of Fire Propagation Characteristics of Exterior Non-Load-Bearing Wall Assemblies Containina Combustible Comuonents. 2006 Edition. Fia. 6.1(a). (c). Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B APPENDIX B Temperature Data August 20, 2009 Page 10 of 45 REVIEWED 13Y SE 2 ) Nn SAFFbuili Colorado Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B Bayer Material Science LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 19 August 2009 Burn Room Average 1$00.00 1700.00 1600.00 1500.00 1400.00 1300.00 1200.00 1100.00 y 1000.00 m 900.00 800.00 700.00 600.00 500.00 400.00 300.00 200.00 100.00 0.00 0 August 20, 2009 Page 11 of 45 REVIEWED EY CEP 2 r) d SAFCbuilt Colorado 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time (min.) Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B Bayer Material Science LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 19 August 2009 Vertical Face TC 1-13 1400.00 1300.00 1200.00 1100.00 1000.00 _ 900.00 d $00.00 i0 700.00 800.00 500.00 400.00 300.00 200.00 100.00 0.00 0 August 20, 2009 Page 12 of 45 REVIEWED BY SEP 2 5 1009 SAFEbuilt Colorado 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time (min.) Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B Bayer Material Science LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 19 August 2009 10 ft Core TC 28, 34, 35, 40, 39 140V. W 1300.00 1200.00 1100.00 1000.00 900.00 800.00 d io 700.00 800.00 500.00 400.00 300.00 200.00 100.00 0.00 0 August 20, 2009 Page 13 of 45 REVIEVAIED By SEP SAFEbuilt Colorado 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time (min.) Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B Bayer Material Science LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 19 August 2009 Vertical Core TC 20-30 1400.00 1300.00 1200.00 1100.00 1000.00 900.00 E $00.00 d 700.00 $00.00 500.00 400.00 300.00 200.00 100.00 0.00 0 August 20, 2009 Page 14 of 45 R V1► : iS_ ZOU SEA 2 5 SAFEbuilt Colorado 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time (min.) Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B Bayer Material Science LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 19 August 2009 10-tt Front Face TC 11, 14-17 1100.00 1000.00 900.00 800.00 700.00 ar 600.00 io 500.00 400.00 300.00 200.00 100.00 0.00 0 August 20, 2009 Page 15 of 45 F;~ . eY ESEP ZOUy SAFE Wit Colorado 5 10 is 20 25 30 Time (min.) Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 600.00 530.00 50OF Rise Limit 500.00 TC #Q -TC #W 450.00 -TC #52 TC #53 400.00 -TC #54 350.00 d 300.00 250.00 200.00 150.00 100.00 50.00 0.00 0 5 10 1s 20 25 30 Time (min.) August 20, 2009 Page 16 of 45 REVIEJAfED BY FyEP 2 lUUU 8AFEbuilt Colorado Bayer Material Science LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 19 August 2009 2nd Floor, l-in from wall TC 49-54 Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B ,000.00 900.00 $00.00 700.00 $00.00 500.00 400.00 300.00 200.00 100.00 0.00 0 S 10 15 20 25 30 Time (min.) August 20, 2009 Page 17 of 45 REVIEWED BY SEP 2 5 7009 SAFEbuilt Colorado Bayer Material Science LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 19 August 2009 Core TC 18, 19 Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 1000.00 800.00 800.00 700.00 F 800.00 W ip, 500.00 100.00 300.00 200.00 100.00 0.00 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time (min.) August 20, 2009 Page 18 of 45 REVIEWED FSEP 5 2009 Bayer Material Science LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 19 August 2009 Core TC 28, 31-40 Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 19 of 45 Beyer Material Scienc LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-00113 19 August 2009 Pasw E119 Std Sum Fall Time Average Room TC 81 TC 82 TC 83 TC 84 TC 85 TC 88 TC 87 TC 84 TC 89 TC MO TC W TC 812 (-In) ('F) (°F) (*F) (°F) ('F) ('F) 1'F) IT) (*F) ('F) (°F) ('F) ('F) ('F) 0 68 124 103 86 85 85 85 84 84 84 84 85 84 85 0.25 115 853 621 464 593 564 512 496 459 425 388 348 297 318 0.5 161 936 769 538 695 648 604 561 508 452 405 370 325 345 0.75 208 1059 857 598 688 815 577 530 484 440 406 373 319 334 1 254 1111 894 613 737 657 616 570 505 445 402 368 323 347 1.25 301 1132 874 811 741 670 837 587 524 454 425 391 332 358 1.5 348 1151 905 783 889 800 758 699 632 546 478 429 362 395 1.75 394 1175 936 766 862 778 733 657 594 515 475 436 382 403 2 441 1193 915 709 808 731 687 809 $42 492 467 429 374 399 2.25 487 1200 912 688 782 730 686 637 573 $23 495 458 379 409 2.5 534 1202 947 708 785 719 882 633 568 487 444 411 361 388 2.78 581 1213 926 669 795 734 701 645 576 519 481 446 358 391 3 627 1218 908 680 784 730 709 658 614 544 502 458 357 403 3.25 674 1228 967 689 801 712 670 615 571 510 478 441 372 400 3.5 720 1240 970 685 817 767 730 666 591 524 483 445 370 397 3.75 767 1256 963 685 811 716 647 579 501 468 439 417 357 383 4 814 1259 974 692 603 752 719 652 595 539 505 468 368 411 4.25 860 1272 981 674 771 720 699 648 591 525 493 456 389 415 4.5 907 1274 960 685 787 724 701 654 608 547 511 479 369 427 4.75 953 1265 952 678 778 736 714 658 590 532 492 456 361 399 5 1000 1277 996 717 841 782 749 685 620 565 547 516 417 456 5.25 1015 1293 1002 806 899 819 802 731 657 593 557 520 422 458 5.5 1030 1297 1088 833 924 848 800 724 822 588 534 502 407 443 5.75 1045 1313 1048 851 958 877 816 713 585 536 517 492 403 438 6 1060 1312 1056 846 906 833 810 746 670 601 582 536 444 480 8.25 1075 1318 1037 819 878 822 793 743 676 607 588 542 460 498 6.5 1090 1313 1059 898 942 877 844 779 899 637 601 544 435 472 8.75 1105 1319 1102 861 903 853 796 725 634 564 536 495 385 422 7 1120 1322 1094 876 963 885 780 691 583 538 510 494 397 431 7.25 1135 1326 1062 892 969 863 787 706 801 543 515 496 400 436 7.5 1150 1322 1078 879 947 875 846 794 708 639 615 565 455 499 7.75 1165 1315 1101 883 930 849 791 713 627 596 576 539 438 478 8 1180 1318 1115 909 963 873 829 746 653 800 584 551 448 483 8.25 1195 1318 1036 917 957 881 860 805 723 650 621 580 472 513 8.5 1210 1311 1058 903 928 860 838 788 705 639 618 580 477 508 8.73 1225 1319 1059 906 948 871 849 780 684 629 605 $59 474 504 9 1240 1310 1092 912 947 872 853 794 744 648 626 582 510 532 9.25 1255 1312 1073 906 935 865 841 790 733 654 617 577 470 511 9.5 1270 1324 1047 909 949 872 857 806 744 666 632 595 504 527 9.75 1285 1323 1095 921 958 880 866 816 769 701 685 622 523 552 10 1300 1319 1097 928 961 880 848 785 714 644 611 563 468 501 10.25 1312 1327 1070 928 978 895 873 813 760 694 670 605 502 $41 10.5 1317 1323 1066 938 975 900 874 828 788 710 699 650 542 578 10.75 1323 1327 1121 939 963 903 879 817 761 677 655 615 531 560 11 1328 1342 1079 958 989 904 882 835 773 690 658 614 515 551 11.25 1333 1338 1092 944 970 910 891 852 798 716 694 650 548 582 11.5 1337 1338 1095 971 989 905 874 815 742 677 648 604 500 539 11.75 1342 1350 1116 958 983 904 876 824 762 682 648 599 510 541 12 1347 1350 1101 949 973 907 871 802 740 678 649 607 521 548 12.25 1351 1362 1112 954 978 907 884 830 778 707 879 627 516 557 125 1356 1351 1113 957 994 910 868 812 752 886 680 606 491 534 12.75 1360 1343 1110 955 976 921 891 839 790 711 686 646 548 584 13 1364 1354 1106 962 982 922 891 831 758 687 664 618 $40 567 13.25 1369 1349 1110 953 978 898 868 815 772 696 664 617 534 563 13.5 1373 1363 1092 966 974 916 882 825 761 684 637 599 493 530 13.75 1377 1341 1135 959 957 901 857 804 757 687 658 622 505 554 14 1381 1354 1106 943 953 898 869 808 763 894 660 819 516 555 14.25 1385 1352 1167 979 998 931 890 845 794 724 713 672 553 800 14.5 1388 1363 1128 970 970 918 893 843 785 712 685 621 523 558 RE\IlEthIED BY SEA 2:; tu,J jJ SAFEbuilt Colorado Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 20 of 45 Bayer Material Scienc LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-0018 19 August 2009 Pawl E719 Std Bum Felt Time Average Room TC Nt TC 42 TC 03 TC 04 TC 05 TC 06 TC 07 TC NO TC N9 TC #10 TC N11 TC N12 (min) (*F) (°F) ('F) (°F) ('F) ('F) ('F) 1°F) ('F) ('F) (°FJ ('F) ('F) (°F) 14.75 1392 1358 1124 955 942 888 847 793 725 668 647 802 499 534 15 1396 1375 1182 988 992 934 914 860 617 733 717 868 547 589 15.25 1400 1418 1169 1029 1043 983 952 893 828 751 722 666 544 579 15.5 1403 1429 1178 1040 1028 974 937 876 803 737 717 669 558 608 15.75 1407 1451 1214 1015 1029 974 931 857 787 713 689 649 551 583 18 1410 1458 1196 1032 1045 983 933 861 791 709 683 637 535 $76 16.25 1414 1462 1181 1032 1041 977 950 889 812 735 703 655 554 586 16.5 1417 1460 1186 1046 1063 1003 966 903 833 751 710 659 555 596 16.75 1420 1471 1240 1038 1055 1003 964 902 833 764 742 695 578 613 17 1424 1470 1225 1056 1112 1047 996 908 816 745 706 651 547 583 17.25 1427 1468 1157 1060 1130 1072 1036 952 846 786 735 680 553 597 17.5 1430 1477 1238 1073 1129 1064 1006 907 807 737 702 642 525 559 17.75 1433 1474 1216 1078 1107 1032 981 894 806 730 700 648 540 569 111 1436 1482 1238 1060 1073 1032 987 910 821 743 720 669 546 593 18.25 1439 1472 1176 1086 1117 1062 1030 952 882 791 745 682 553 603 18.5 1442 1480 1236 1117 1158 1099 1045 947 859 771 733 670 572 606 18.75 1445 1486 1223 1065 1094 1051 1015 933 850 768 745 682 580 611 19 1448 1482 1203 1130 1213 1133 1063 947 837 757 713 657 529 575 19.25 1451 1488 1220 1140 1175 1104 1045 944 855 777 743 691 563 617 19.5 1454 1490 1250 1107 1145 1110 1062 975 882 789 759 698 577 619 19.75 1457 1478 1235 1116 1141 1085 1048 960 863 783 754 699 568 614 20 1459 1489 1247 1144 1185 1124 1107 1020 928 819 787 895 573 820 20.25 1462 1488 1221 1148 1209 1141 1110 1026 931 835 806 748 605 863 20.5 1465 1476 1244 1189 1238 1141 1094 1013 926 844 821 756 619 672 20.75 1467 1486 1230 1190 1248 1183 1136 1039 928 830 801 755 626 673 21 1470 1487 1288 1144 1177 1117 1085 1007 916 822 781 736 624 671 21.25 1473 1488 1241 1152 1198 1133 1075 989 894 810 780 734 622 683 21.5 1475 1500 1211 1151 1198 1125 1095 1025 944 843 791 724 590 639 21.75 1478 1494 1219 1147 1196 1121 1087 1010 930 844 808 736 597 646 22 1480 1501 1223 1160 1193 1138 1092 1010 921 831 795 735 618 869 22.25 1483 1505 1243 1139 1225 1169 1120 1017 921 814 777 707 581 623 22.5 1485 1505 1232 1158 1252 1179 1124 1018 916 816 784 740 607 648 22.75 1488 1518 1259 1158 1206 1131 1096 998 905 808 777 720 604 655 23 1490 1517 1293 1184 1238 1172 1108 1002 880 795 785 718 579 629 23.25 1493 1518 1287 1150 1239 1158 1112 1014 914 806 772 707 588 628 23.5 1495 1513 1245 1168 1246 1194 1140 1030 903 815 785 728 581 632 23.75 1497 1506 1246 1163 1216 1141 1094 1012 929 840 811 741 610 659 24 1499 1519 1275 1156 1237 1155 1084 970 863 782 745 695 572 625 24.25 1502 1518 1302 1147 1214 1160 1114 1029 936 850 823 769 617 671 24.5 1504 1524 1244 1137 1198 1153 1106 1008 904 811 784 725 570 628 24.75 1506 1523 1247 1175 1242 1171 1114 1007 901 807 786 728 609 653 25 1508 1531 1273 1191 1257 1181 1099 981 859 761 722 664 561 800 25.25 1511 1566 1269 1190 1251 1175 1120 1021 918 817 785 736 600 650 25.5 1513 1560 1272 1216 1264 1187 1130 1034 927 825 791 740 614 663 25.75 1515 1560 1287 1240 1282 1179 1115 1015 919 836 808 755 621 666 26 1517 1559 1268 1229 1287 1200 1140 1049 955 852 804 749 613 664 26.25 1519 1564 1285 1215 1276 1171 1125 1032 926 824 793 735 613 658 26.5 1521 1562 1318 1261 1285 1186 1115 1016 910 829 804 754 622 873 26.75 1523 1568 1242 1281 1316 1199 1143 1049 939 841 827 773 628 690 REVIEWED BY- EEP 4' 5 2009 SAFEbuilt Colorado Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B Bayer MatwW Sclenc llC Project No. 3194245MT-0018 August 20, 2009 Page 21 of 45 19 August 2009 Pass! E119 Std Bum Fall Tl"w Average Room TC AN TC 02 TC 03 TC 04 TC 05 TC 06 TC A7 TC 08 TC 09 TC 010 TC AN1 TC 012 Imm) (*F) (°F) 1•F) (°F) CF) (*F) ('F) CF) ('F) (•F) (°F) CFI ('F) (°F) 27 1525 1573 1287 1230 1337 1176 1121 1031 945 857 829 775 822 682 27.25 1527 1580 1261 1273 1374 1213 1149 1045 931 841 812 754 598 649 27.5 1529 1589 1329 1237 1320 1197 1143 1050 984 671 836 766 612 Gee 27.75 1531 1584 1300 1252 1323 1201 1149 1060 968 861 817 781 673 711 n 1533 1595 1230 1270 1361 1236 1174 1073 957 848 811 758 627 678 nm 1535 1609 1308 1262 1356 1211 1126 1022 937 841 814 765 630 687 2R5 1537 1607 1270 1280 1365 1211 1126 1024 939 831 795 743 607 654 28.75 1539 1595 1261 1295 1365 1240 1153 1050 952 866 836 779 621 672 29 1541 1596 1275 1262 1346 1206 1139 1043 967 877 843 767 627 671 29.25 1543 1592 1277 1289 1336 1224 1126 1015 918 829 790 735 581 636 29.5 1545 1592 1277 1306 1367 1215 1150 1066 991 888 853 797 645 692 29.73 1547 1610 1251 1283 1339 1214 1141 1046 950 860 838 793 657 698 30 1549 1609 1292 1321 1365 1255 1173 1073 985 875 831 772 632 690 30.23 1550 1420 997 1072 1063 1001 919 840 763 712 669 620 519 558 30.5 1552 1208 747 868 644 803 729 660 604 568 526 462 393 425 30.75 1554 1102 671 794 773 736 675 611 555 526 484 445 362 395 31 1556 1032 613 754 715 678 623 570 523 497 465 425 344 377 31.25 1558 979 583 726 701 655 600 552 501 473 438 407 334 363 31.5 1559 938 555 711 668 627 573 523 475 452 418 391 335 357 31.75 1561 905 531 684 639 594 544 499 450 433 406 381 317 341 32 1563 878 502 670 618 583 533 487 445 424 396 373 308 333 32.25 1585 845 481 653 588 551 502 458 417 403 375 353 287 311 315 1596 806 460 651 587 548 496 454 411 395 363 338 279 301 32.75 1568 778 443 616 544 507 460 426 388 372 348 330 279 300 33 1570 754 432 $98 515 494 451 416 383 368 346 326 273 293 33.25 1571 732 416 583 502 483 435 400 366 352 329 310 265 282 33.5 1573 713 408 569 483 466 419 386 358 347 325 303 260 274 33.75 1575 695 396 562 476 462 414 382 357 340 313 291 246 264 34 1576 679 388 559 477 485 413 378 344 326 306 289 244 262 34.25 1578 685 377 549 458 451 401 370 341 329 308 293 246 263 34.5 1579 650 388 538 441 445 388 354 326 317 299 278 235 253 34.75 1581 636 356 529 437 438 386 357 333 317 299 286 246 259 35 1563 624 354 523 433 436 383 350 329 308 286 270 234 247 35.25 1584 613 346 519 416 432 377 344 318 300 280 265 230 242 35.5 1588 001 337 511 413 423 366 332 310 290 272 281 232 242 35.75 1587 590 330 507 415 431 371 339 319 302 286 272 236 250 36 1589 581 312 502 398 419 363 332 310 296 280 266 231 244 36.25 1590 573 311 501 401 415 363 329 301 282 263 254 217 231 36.5 1592 564 305 496 384 414 359 328 305 289 270 261 228 240 36.75 1593 556 303 492 382 409 351 320 294 280 267 258 222 236 37 1595 548 294 484 379 402 347 315 296 280 263 252 220 233 37.25 1596 540 298 482 377 406 348 313 289 270 256 243 212 223 37.5 1598 534 292 479 378 404 339 307 282 268 253 245 212 224 37.75 1599 527 285 472 370 400 339 306 282 265 252 240 213 225 38 1601 520 277 472 366 397 339 309 283 265 248 238 210 221 38.25 1602 514 281 467 363 392 332 300 275 261 245 234 206 218 36.5 1604 508 277 467 362 405 336 303 274 264 249 242 212 223 38.75 1605 502 275 463 356 402 335 304 278 266 253 242 208 221 39 1606 496 271 461 352 395 324 294 272 257 244 235 206 218 39.25 1808 490 269 462 354 388 317 284 255 245 231 223 196 206 39.5 1009 465 265 460 381 409 323 288 260 246 733 225 198 208 39.75 1611 479 261 464 360 404 318 283 253 245 231 225 195 206 40 1612 474 259 463 362 415 330 291 262 254 239 233 205 216 Max Temp 1329 1321 1385 1255 1174 1073 991 888 853 797 673 711 Max Allowed 1000 REVIEWED BY SEP 2.5 10uS SAFEbuilt Colorado Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 22 of 45 Bayer Mlaterial Scienc LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 19 August 2009 Pass) Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass! Pass) Fall Fall Fall Fall Fail Fall Time TC #13 TC #14 TC 013 TC N16 TC 117 TC 018 TC A119 TC 020 TC 021 TC 022 TC 023 TC 024 TC 425 TC 026 (min) ('F) ('F) ('F) ('F) (°F) ('F) (°F) ('F) (°F) (°F) (°F) (°F) (°F) ('F) 0 84 84 84 64 84 88 87 89 88 87 88 87 86 88 0.25 289 88 194 164 103 89 87 89 88 87 87 88 86 88 0.5 308 89 228 192 111 89 88 90 88 87 88 87 86 86 0.73 300 101 223 186 119 89 87 89 88 87 88 87 86 86 1 306 100 230 205 110 89 87 89 88 87 88 87 86 86 1.25 315 103 232 194 108 89 87 89 88 87 88 87 86 86 1.5 333 118 246 202 122 88 87 89 88 87 88 87 86 86 1.75 357 108 239 208 121 88 87 90 88 87 88 86 86 86 2 352 108 248 238 126 89 88 91 88 87 88 87 86 88 2.25 353 97 233 206 121 89 88 93 88 88 88 87 86 88 2.5 343 96 248 228 112 90 88 97 88 88 88 87 87 88 2.75 333 108 242 214 112 91 89 102 88 88 89 87 87 87 3 341 101 244 228 107 93 91 106 88 89 90 87 87 87 3.25 339 105 257 216 126 95 94 111 88 89 92 88 88 88 3.5 341 105 223 237 133 98 96 115 89 91 93 88 88 89 3.75 343 93 203 258 134 101 98 118 89 92 94 89 89 90 4 344 98 227 241 122 104 101 122 89 93 95 90 90 92 4.25 368 92 220 228 125 107 103 126 90 94 97 91 91 93 4.5 358 100 226 251 133 111 105 129 92 96 98 92 92 94 4.75 336 104 240 240 139 113 107 132 93 98 100 94 93 96 5 405 107 246 269 149 116 108 135 95 99 102 95 94 97 5.25 406 112 280 308 134 119 110 138 96 101 105 98 95 99 5.5 395 119 277 317 174 121 112 141 98 103 108 98 97 100 5.75 386 112 272 346 184 123 113 143 100 106 112 99 98 102 6 419 107 294 280 152 125 114 146 103 108 119 100 99 103 6.25 426 110 315 270 148 126 115 149 107 110 128 101 100 105 6.5 405 110 292 289 171 128 118 151 111 113 138 103 102 107 8.75 372 117 285 295 152 129 117 154 115 115 142 104 103 108 7 386 104 249 313 162 130 117 156 119 116 148 105 104 110 7.25 387 112 258 290 143 131 118 159 123 121 153 107 108 112 7.5 435 110 281 316 146 132 118 161 128 124 158 108 107 113 7.75 419 103 280 303 149 132 119 164 134 127 163 110 109 115 a 428 106 290 313 172 133 120 166 139 130 177 111 110 117 0.25 440 120 292 294 142 133 120 168 145 134 187 113 112 119 8.5 440 113 293 295 157 134 121 171 149 137 189 114 113 120 8.75 450 110 290 308 168 134 122 173 154 143 190 116 115 122 9 462 108 312 288 155 134 122 175 157 150 193 117 117 124 9.25 448 108 309 274 154 134 123 177 160 158 195 119 118 126 9.5 481 117 291 300 148 134 123 179 163 161 195 120 120 128 9.75 496 110 296 298 152 135 124 181 164 164 195 121 122 130 10 437 110 293 298 150 133 124 183 165 167 195 123 123 132 10.25 464 107 331 291 149 135 124 184 166 169 195 124 125 134 1415 511 109 311 293 158 135 125 185 168 171 195 126 126 136 10.75 493 109 294 273 145 135 125 187 169 172 195 127 128 137 11 493 118 345 308 157 135 126 188 170 173 196 129 130 139 11.25 515 108 345 288 161 135 126 189 171 174 196 130 131 141 11.5 474 119 321 317 152 135 126 190 172 175 196 131 133 143 11.75 477 110 329 307 151 135 126 191 173 176 196 133 134 145 12 497 115 333 311 154 136 127 191 174 177 195 134 135 146 12.25 486 124 307 312 148 136 127 192 174 177 195 135 137 147 125 470 108 293 302 155 137 128 192 175 178 195 136 138 149 12.75 512 108 316 289 142 138 128 193 176 178 194 137 139 150 13 506 112 339 291 156 140 128 193 178 178 194 138 141 151 13.25 498 117 332 298 158 142 129 193 177 178 194 140 142 152 13.5 463 118 323 287 153 143 129 194 178 179 194 141 143 153 13.75 475 117 314 273 151 144 129 194 178 179 193 142 144 154 14 483 111 340 315 174 146 130 194 179 179 193 143 145 155 U.25 517 115 350 302 167 147 131 195 180 179 193 144 146 156 14.5 482 114 321 307 161 149 131 195 180 179 193 145 147 157 -REVIEWED BY SEP 25 2000 SAFEbuili Colorado Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 23 of 45 Beyer Material Sctenc llC Project No. 3184245SAT-M B 19 August 2009 Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Time TC #13 TC #14 TC 015 TC 016 TC #17 TC 010 TC #19 TC 020 TC 021 TC OU TC 023 TC #24 TC 025 TC 020 (min) (*F) (°F) ('F) ('F) (°F) ('F) (°F) ('F) (°F) (°F) (°F) ('F) (°F) (°F) 14.75 473 105 315 297 165 152 131 194 181 178 192 146 148 157 15 511 124 358 316 160 154 132 194 181 178 192 146 149 158 15.25 521 122 352 341 174 156 132 193 181 178 192 150 149 159 15.5 515 122 322 321 166 159 133 194 182 178 193 152 150 159 15.75 507 137 367 316 164 160 133 193 182 178 193 154 151 180 16 502 130 350 321 156 161 134 194 182 178 193 156 152 160 16.25 528 125 338 331 158 162 134 194 182 178 193 158 152 161 16.5 516 118 323 333 169 163 134 194 182 177 193 139 153 162 16.75 551 122 336 346 164 164 135 194 183 177 192 160 154 162 17 528 131 335 387 176 165 136 195 183 177 192 162 155 184 17.25 521 124 310 344 185 168 136 195 183 177 192 162 155 188 17.3 498 115 379 368 189 166 137 195 183 177 192 163 156 187 17.75 509 129 351 354 167 167 137 196 183 176 192 163 156 188 18 516 134 366 339 161 168 138 197 183 176 192 164 157 189 18.25 526 131 353 299 160 170 138 198 183 175 192 164 158 189 1845 546 131 356 338 156 171 139 199 184 175 194 164 158 189 18.75 544 126 342 323 152 172 139 200 184 175 204 164 159 190 19 512 129 357 364 172 174 140 201 184 174 210 163 159 190 19.25 525 132 359 361 185 175 141 203 185 174 211 163 160 191 19.5 536 122 361 345 168 176 141 206 185 174 208 163 160 192 19.75 537 120 338 336 170 178 142 214 186 174 206 163 161 193 20 535 138 400 363 160 179 143 231 188 173 207 163 161 194 20.25 559 132 383 351 172 181 143 249 186 173 206 162 163 194 20.5 574 130 380 322 173 183 144 268 186 173 209 162 167 195 20.75 588 130 364 358 193 184 145 289 187 173 209 162 189 195 21 574 138 364 359 170 186 146 315 187 173 210 163 171 196 21.25 581 140 400 346 163 188 147 354 187 174 210 163 172 197 21.5 567 124 383 348 180 190 148 574 188 174 210 165 173 198 21.75 571 133 408 333 152 192 149 756 188 175 211 165 174 199 22 575 138 398 356 184 194 150 763 188 176 212 166 174 200 22.25 516 129 398 392 176 195 152 758 188 176 213 167 175 201 22.5 564 143 402 360 163 195 153 751 188 177 214 168 175 201 22.75 564 129 383 377 164 195 156 757 188 177 214 168 175 202 23 545 138 373 380 177 195 158 762 189 178 215 169 176 202 23.25 548 123 360 384 154 195 161 766 189 178 214 169 176 201 215 547 121 393 336 147 195 165 760 189 178 214 170 176 201 23.75 565 126 354 365 160 194 168 804 189 179 214 170 177 201 24 548 141 406 353 147 193 171 820 189 179 214 171 177 201 24.25 580 131 384 359 145 193 175 836 190 179 213 171 178 200 24.5 540 135 386 384 156 194 178 853 190 179 212 171 178 199 24.75 578 156 380 404 157 194 181 865 190 179 212 172 179 198 25 543 144 391 409 146 195 184 867 190 179 211 172 179 198 25.25 573 134 401 386 148 196 188 869 190 179 210 172 179 197 25.5 572 142 388 386 176 198 192 858 190 179 209 172 179 197 25.75 569 136 407 402 179 202 196 839 190 179 209 172 179 197 26 572 139 387 384 180 208 200 821 190 179 208 172 180 196 26.25 560 137 417 369 176 215 205 818 191 179 208 173 180 196 26.5 583 133 428 395 177 222 211 818 191 179 207 173 180 196 26.75 583 152 396 366 190 229 217 823 191 179 206 173 180 195 REVIEWED BY SEP 2:; 2uu :oioradc Bayer Material Science, LLC August 20, 2009 Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B Page 24 of 45 Bayer Matertal Sdenc LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 19 August 2009 Pass/ Pass) Pass! Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Fall Fail Fall Fall Fall Fall Tlme TC #13 TC #14 TC N15 TC N16 TC #17 TC N79 TC 09 TC 020 TC 021 TC M TC 023 TC 024 TC 925 TC 426 lminl 1'F) (OF) (OF) (*Fl (OF) 1'F) (°F) 1'F) ('F) (°F) (OF) 1°F) 1°F) ('F) 27 578 137 374 404 178 237 224 843 190 179 205 173 180 195 27.25 565 160 433 385 169 245 232 851 190 179 205 173 180 195 27.5 585 154 397 368 158 252 238 837 190 179 204 173 180 194 27.75 625 147 406 354 181 259 245 843 190 179 204 172 180 194 n 593 142 436 367 160 266 251 841 190 179 205 172 179 194 29.28 598 152 436 381 134 273 256 859 190 179 205 172 179 194 26.5 572 139 417 366 188 280 261 862 190 179 208 172 179 194 28.75 583 131 369 378 179 289 265 882 189 179 207 172 179 194 29 590 136 435 374 175 298 269 910 189 178 207 172 179 194 29.25 547 144 407 390 175 307 274 938 189 179 207 172 179 194 215 610 140 425 347 150 317 280 970 188 178 206 172 179 194 29.73 615 137 389 344 131 327 287 992 188 179 206 172 179 194 30 603 141 446 384 161 335 293 1014 188 179 206 172 179 194 30.25 488 142 312 309 144 342 298 1052 188 179 206 172 179 194 30.5 384 125 262 242 127 348 303 998 186 179 205 172 179 194 30.75 348 118 242 225 110 352 307 1023 187 179 205 172 179 193 31 338 116 224 193 112 357 311 1042 186 179 203 172 178 193 31.25 326 119 231 190 114 362 314 1009 184 179 201 171 178 192 31.5 327 116 221 186 113 367 318 1036 183 179 199 171 178 191 31.75 312 110 209 192 116 371 321 1046 182 179 197 171 177 190 32 304 110 207 189 112 373 325 1074 181 179 194 171 177 189 32.25 288 111 199 182 111 373 328 1102 179 179 192 170 177 187 325 272 118 187 188 108 370 331 1120 179 179 190 170 176 186 32.75 274 111 194 174 116 365 334 1129 177 179 187 169 176 185 33 268 108 183 170 110 360 336 1149 177 179 185 168 175 183 33.25 257 108 179 163 108 355 339 1172 176 179 183 168 174 182 33.5 256 104 175 163 108 351 341 1181 176 179 181 168 174 181 33.75 239 103 183 171 114 347 343 1185 175 179 179 167 173 180 34 240 104 174 175 116 343 344 1201 175 179 176 166 172 179 34.25 241 106 168 167 112 341 347 1200 174 179 174 166 171 178 34.5 230 102 174 162 107 339 349 1199 174 179 172 165 171 177 34.75 243 99 158 ISO 102 336 351 1200 174 179 170 165 170 176 35 226 105 171 150 105 334 354 1189 174 179 169 164 169 175 35.25 224 104 165 150 108 333 356 1190 174 179 167 163 169 174 33.3 224 99 154 143 105 331 359 1184 174 179 166 163 168 173 33.75 231 101 147 145 102 329 361 1195 174 179 164 163 168 172 36 224 102 159 148 105 328 364 1223 174 179 163 162 167 171 36.25 210 103 153 143 104 327 366 1232 174 179 162 162 166 170 36.5 222 100 157 137 100 326 368 1257 174 179 161 161 165 169 36.75 219 100 160 140 105 325 370 1284 174 179 160 161 165 169 37 214 103 156 143 106 324 372 1301 174 179 159 160 164 168 37.25 209 103 155 144 105 323 373 1328 174 179 159 160 164 168 37.5 208 102 146 142 105 322 375 1366 174 179 158 160 163 167 37.75 206 99 147 142 104 322 377 1384 174 179 157 159 163 166 38 204 100 150 140 101 322 379 1400 175 179 156 159 162 166 38.25 202 104 147 140 104 321 381 1425 175 178 156 158 162 165 38.5 207 101 144 138 104 321 382 1446 175 178 155 158 161 165 38.75 201 103 146 141 102 320 385 1467 176 178 155 158 161 165 39 201 100 142 138 102 320 387 1460 177 179 154 157 160 164 39.25 193 102 145 136 100 319 389 1453 178 179 154 157 160 164 39.5 194 100 135 141 101 318 392 1450 180 179 153 157 159 163 39.75 192 100 138 136 100 317 394 1449 184 179 153 156 159 163 40 202 99 142 130 103 316 396 1448 188 180 152 156 159 163 Max Tamp 625 160 446 409 193 373 396 1467 191 180 215 173 180 202 Max Allowed 1000 1000 1000 1000 838 837 REViEV,/E- S72-5 o x _ F SAFEbuilt Coyedo Yi Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 25 of 45 Bayer Materiel Soiene LLC Project No. 3164245MT-0018 19 August 2009 Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Fall Fall Fall Fail Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Time TC #27 TC 828 TC A28 TC 830 TC $31 TC 032 TC 033 TC N34 TC #35 TC 036 TC 037 TC 038 TC 039 TC /40 (min) ('F) (°F) (*F) l'F) ('F) ('F) ('F) ('F) (°F) IT) (°F) ('F) (°F) ('F) 0 67 84 88 84 87 87 67 87 86 88 80 86 Be 87 0.23 88 84 Be 64 87 87 87 87 88 88 Be 88 88 87 0.5 87 64 88 84 87 87 87 87 88 86 86 86 88 87 0.75 87 84 88 84 87 87 67 87 86 86 86 86 Be 87 1 87 84 88 64 87 87 87 88 87 86 88 88 86 88 1.25 87 84 88 84 87 87 87 87 88 88 88 86 88 87 1.5 87 84 88 84 87 87 87 87 87 88 86 88 88 87 1.75 87 84 88 84 87 87 87 88 87 86 86 86 88 88 2 87 84 88 84 87 87 87 87 as 86 86 Be 88 87 2.25 87 84 88 85 87 87 87 87 87 86 86 86 88 87 2.5 88 84 88 85 87 87 87 87 87 88 88 86 Be 87 2.73 89 84 88 85 87 67 87 87 87 86 86 86 Be 88 3 91 84 89 85 87 87 87 87 87 86 86 86 88 Be 3.25 93 85 89 86 87 87 87 88 87 86 86 86 88 88 3.5 95 85 90 86 87 87 87 87 87 86 86 86 88 89 3.75 97 85 92 87 87 87 87 88 88 86 86 86 88 89 4 100 85 93 88 87 87 87 88 Be 86 86 87 88 90 4.25 102 86 94 89 87 87 87 88 88 86 87 87 88 90 4.5 104 86 96 91 87 87 87 88 89 86 86 86 86 91 4.75 105 86 97 92 87 87 87 68 90 86 87 87 89 92 5 107 86 99 93 87 Be as 88 90 87 87 87 89 93 5.25 109 87 100 95 as Be 88 88 91 87 87 87 89 94 5.5 110 88 101 96 88 68 88 89 92 87 87 87 89 95 5.75 112 88 103 98 Be 88 88 89 92 87 87 87 89 96 6 114 89 104 99 Be 86 Be 89 93 87 87 87 89 97 6.25 115 89 105 101 88 88 89 89 94 87 87 88 89 98 8.5 118 90 106 102 88 88 89 89 94 87 87 88 90 99 6.75 118 91 107 104 88 89 89 90 95 87 87 88 90 100 7 119 92 109 106 88 89 89 90 96 87 87 88 90 101 7.25 120 92 110 107 89 89 89 90 97 87 88 88 90 102 7.5 122 93 111 109 89 89 90 90 97 87 88 88 90 103 7.75 123 94 112 110 89 89 90 91 98 88 88 89 90 104 8 125 95 113 112 89 89 90 91 99 88 88 89 90 105 8.25 126 95 115 114 89 90 91 91 100 88 88 89 90 106 8.5 128 96 118 118 89 90 91 92 101 88 88 69 91 107 8.75 129 97 117 118 89 90 91 92 102 88 88 89 91 108 9 131 98 119 119 90 90 92 92 103 88 88 89 91 109 9.25 132 99 120 121 90 90 92 92 104 88 88 90 91 111 9.5 134 100 121 123 90 91 92 93 105 89 89 90 91 112 9.75 135 102 123 125 90 91 93 93 106 89 89 90 91 113 10 137 103 124 127 90 91 93 93 107 89 89 90 91 114 10.25 138 104 126 129 90 91 93 93 108 69 89 91 92 115 10.S 140 105 127 131 91 91 94 94 109 89 89 91 92 116 10.75 141 107 129 134 91 92 94 94 110 90 89 91 92 117 11 143 108 130 136 91 92 94 95 111 90 90 91 92 118 11.25 144 109 132 138 91 92 95 95 112 90 90 92 92 119 11.5 146 111 133 140 91 92 95 95 113 90 90 92 92 120 11.75 147 113 134 142 92 93 96 96 114 91 90 92 93 121 12 148 114 136 143 92 93 96 96 115 91 90 92 93 122 12.25 149 115 137 145 92 93 97 96 116 91 90 93 93 123 12.5 150 117 138 146 92 93 97 97 116 91 91 93 93 124 12.75 151 118 139 147 92 93 97 97 118 92 91 93 94 125 13 152 119 140 148 92 94 98 97 118 92 91 93 94 126 13.25 153 121 142 149 93 94 98 98 120 92 91 94 94 127 13.5 154 122 142 150 93 94 98 98 120 92 91 94 94 128 13.75 155 123 143 151 93 94 99 98 121 93 92 94 95 129 14 155 124 144 151 93 95 99 99 122 93 92 95 95 129 14.25 156 125 145 151 93 95 99 99 123 93 92 95 95 130 14.5 157 126 146 151 94 95 100 99 124 94 92 95 96 131 REVIEWED BY SEP ~ ~ ~ ZQU~ SAFEbuili Co)creco Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 26 of 45 Beyer Material Scteac LLC Project No. 3164245SAT-001 B 19 August 2009 Pass! Pass! Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass! Pass/ Pass! Fail Fall Fall Fall Fall Fail FOR Fall Fall Fall Fall Time TC 027 TC 828 TC 829 TC 830 TC 431 TC N32 TC 033 TC 034 TC 05 TC 036 TC 037 TC 438 TC 039 TC #40 (min) ('F) ('F) ('F) CF► ('F) ('F) ('F) ('F) (°F) ('F) iv) (°F) (°F) ('F) 14.75 157 127 146 152 94 95 100 100 125 94 93 96 96 132 15 158 128 147 152 94 96 100 100 126 94 93 96 96 132 15.25 158 129 148 152 94 96 101 100 127 94 93 96 97 133 15.5 159 130 149 152 94 96 101 100 128 95 93 97 97 134 15.75 159 131 149 152 95 97 102 101 128 95 93 97 97 135 18 160 131 150 152 95 97 102 101 129 95 94 97 97 135 16.25 180 132 151 153 95 97 102 101 130 95 94 97 98 136 16.5 161 133 151 153 95 97 102 102 131 96 94 98 98 137 16.75 161 134 152 153 96 98 103 102 132 96 94 96 98 137 17 162 135 152 153 96 98 103 102 132 96 95 98 99 138 17.25 162 136 153 154 96 98 103 102 133 97 95 98 99 139 17.5 163 136 154 154 96 Be 104 103 134 97 95 99 99 139 17.75 163 137 154 154 97 99 104 103 135 97 95 99 100 140 1s 163 138 155 155 97 99 104 103 135 97 96 100 100 141 18.25 164 138 155 155 97 100 105 103 136 98 96 100 100 141 18.5 164 139 156 156 97 100 105 103 137 98 96 100 101 142 18.75 164 139 156 156 98 100 106 104 137 98 97 100 101 143 19 165 140 157 156 98 100 106 104 138 98 97 101 102 143 19.25 166 141 157 157 98 101 106 104 139 99 97 101 102 144 19.5 167 141 158 157 90 101 107 104 139 99 97 101 102 145 19.75 168 142 158 158 99 101 107 104 140 99 97 102 103 145 20 166 142 158 158 99 102 107 105 141 100 98 102 103 146 20.25 169 142 159 158 99 102 108 105 142 100 98 102 103 146 20.5 169 143 159 159 100 102 108 105 142 100 98 102 103 147 20.75 170 143 160 159 100 103 108 105 143 100 98 103 104 147 21 170 144 160 160 100 103 108 105 144 101 99 103 104 148 21.25 170 144 180 160 100 103 109 105 144 101 99 103 104 148 21.5 171 145 161 160 101 103 109 105 145 101 99 103 105 149 21.75 171 145 181 160 101 104 110 106 146 102 99 103 105 149 22 170 145 161 161 101 104 110 106 146 102 100 104 105 150 22.25 170 145 161 161 102 105 110 106 147 102 100 104 105 150 22.5 170 148 162 182 102 105 111 107 148 102 100 104 106 150 22.75 170 146 162 162 102 105 111 107 148 102 100 105 106 151 23 170 146 162 162 103 105 111 107 149 103 100 105 106 151 23.25 170 146 162 162 103 106 112 107 150 103 101 105 106 152 23.5 170 147 162 163 103 106 112 108 151 103 101 105 107 152 23.75 170 147 162 163 104 107 113 108 151 103 101 106 107 153 24 170 147 162 163 104 107 113 106 152 104 101 106 107 153 24.25 170 147 163 164 104 107 113 108 153 104 101 106 107 153 24.5 170 147 163 164 105 108 114 109 153 104 102 106 107 154 24.75 171 148 163 164 105 108 114 109 154 105 102 106 107 154 25 171 148 163 165 105 108 114 109 154 105 102 106 107 154 25.25 171 148 163 165 106 109 115 109 155 105 102 107 108 155 25.5 171 148 163 165 106 109 115 109 155 105 102 107 108 155 2515 171 148 163 166 106 109 115 110 156 105 103 107 108 155 26 172 148 163 166 107 110 116 110 156 106 103 107 108 156 26.25 172 149 163 167 107 110 116 110 157 106 103 107 109 156 26.5 172 149 163 167 107 110 116 110 158 106 103 107 109 156 26.75 172 149 164 168 107 110 116 110 158 106 103 107 109 157 REVIEWED SY SEP 2 5 MY SAFEbuilt Colorado Bayer Material Science, LLC August 20, 2009 Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B Page 27 of 45 Bayer Meterhl Scienc LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-0018 19 August 2009 Pass/ Pass! Pass/ Passl Pass/ Pass! Pass/ Pess/ Pass/ Passl Passl FIJI Fall Fall FIJI Fail Fall Fail Fall Fall Fall Fall Time TC 427 TC 128 TC 629 TC 430 TC 031 TC 032 TC 033 TC 034 TC 035 TC #36 TC 037 TC 038 TC 039 TC "0 (min) ('F) (°F) (IF) CFI ('F) (IF) ('F) ('F) (°F) ('F) (°F) (OF) (°F) (*F) 27 172 149 164 169 107 110 117 110 159 106 103 107 109 157 27.25 172 149 184 189 108 111 117 111 159 107 103 107 110 157 27.5 172 150 165 170 108 111 118 111 160 107 104 108 110 158 27.75 172 150 165 171 108 111 118 111 160 107 104 108 110 158 28 172 150 165 171 108 112 118 111 161 108 104 108 111 159 28.25 172 150 165 171 108 112 118 111 161 107 104 108 110 159 2A5 172 150 165 172 109 112 119 111 162 108 104 108 111 159 28.75 173 150 165 172 109 112 119 111 162 108 105 108 111 159 29 173 151 166 173 109 112 120 111 163 100 105 108 111 160 29.25 173 151 166 173 110 113 120 112 163 108 105 109 112 160 215 173 151 166 173 110 113 120 112 163 108 105 109 112 160 29.73 173 151 166 174 110 113 121 112 164 109 105 109 112 160 30 173 151 166 174 110 114 121 112 164 109 105 109 112 160 30.25 173 152 166 174 111 114 121 113 164 109 105 110 112 161 30.5 173 152 166 175 111 114 122 113 165 109 106 110 112 161 30.75 173 152 167 175 111 115 122 113 165 110 106 110 112 161 31 173 152 167 176 112 115 122 113 165 110 106 110 112 161 31.25 173 152 167 176 112 115 123 113 165 110 106 110 112 162 31.5 172 152 167 176 112 116 123 114 166 110 106 111 113 162 31.75 171 152 167 176 113 118 123 114 166 110 107 111 113 162 32 170 152 167 176 113 116 124 114 166 111 107 111 113 162 32.25 170 152 167 177 113 117 124 114 188 111 107 111 113 162 32.5 189 152 167 177 113 117 124 114 108 111 107 111 113 162 32.75 168 152 186 177 114 117 125 114 166 111 107 112 113 162 33 167 151 166 176 114 117 125 114 186 111 107 112 113 162 33.25 167 151 166 177 114 118 125 115 166 112 107 112 114 162 33.5 168 151 166 177 114 118 125 115 165 112 107 112 114 162 33.75 165 150 166 176 115 118 126 115 165 112 107 112 114 162 34 165 150 165 176 115 118 126 115 165 112 107 112 114 162 34.25 164 150 165 176 115 119 126 115 165 112 107 112 114 182 34.5 163 150 165 176 115 119 126 115 165 113 107 112 114 162 34.75 162 149 165 176 116 119 126 116 165 113 107 113 114 162 35 182 149 164 175 116 120 127 116 165 113 107 113 114 162 35.25 161 149 164 175 116 120 127 116 165 113 108 113 114 161 35.5 161 148 163 175 116 120 127 116 164 113 108 113 114 161 35.75 160 148 163 175 117 120 127 116 164 114 108 113 115 161 36 180 148 163 174 117 120 127 116 164 114 108 113 115 161 36.25 159 148 182 174 117 120 127 118 164 114 108 113 115 161 36.5 159 147 162 174 117 120 127 116 164 114 108 113 115 160 36.75 138 147 162 173 117 121 127 116 164 114 108 113 115 160 37 158 147 162 173 117 121 127 116 164 114 108 113 115 160 31.25 157 146 161 173 118 121 127 116 163 114 108 113 115 160 37.5 157 146 161 172 118 121 127 116 163 114 109 113 115 159 37.75 157 146 161 172 118 121 128 116 163 114 109 113 115 159 38 156 146 160 172 118 121 128 116 163 114 109 113 115 159 38.25 156 145 160 171 118 121 128 116 163 114 109 113 115 159 38.5 156 145 160 171 118 122 128 116 162 115 109 114 115 156 38.75 155 145 160 170 118 121 128 116 162 114 109 113 115 156 39 155 141 159 170 118 122 128 116 162 115 109 114 115 158 39.25 155 111 159 170 119 122 128 118 182 115 109 114 115 158 39.5 154 111 159 169 119 122 127 116 162 114 109 113 115 157 39.75 154 143 159 169 119 122 127 116 161 114 109 114 115 157 40 154 143 158 168 119 122 127 116 161 114 109 114 115 156 Max Temp 173 152 167 177 119 122 128 116 166 115 109 114 115 162 Max Allowed 834 837 837 837 837 836 838 836 836 638 837 REVIEWE S-P ) 2Uiiy E SAFEbuilt Colorado Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 28 of 45 Bayer MetwW Soierk LLC Project No. 3184245MT-001 B 19 August 2009 Pass! Pass! Pass/ Pass! Pasw Pass! Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Time TC M41 TC M42 TC 043 TC 0" TC 045 TC M16 TC M47 TC 048 TC 449 TC M50 TC 051 TC M52 TC M53 TC M54 (min) (*F) CF) 1'F) ('F) ('F) 1°F) CFI ('F) (°F) (*F) (F) CFI CF) ('F) 0 107 132 142 118 125 108 102 123 89 89 88 88 87 87 0.25 598 871 796 512 490 497 480 592 90 90 88 88 88 87 0.5 918 1110 1068 809 760 788 802 875 90 90 89 89 88 88 0.75 1047 1221 1179 944 902 906 957 993 90 90 88 90 Be 87 1 1110 1270 1205 1000 970 963 1021 1040 91 90 88 92 89 87 1.25 1147 1300 1195 1021 997 994 1080 1064 92 90 88 92 88 88 1.5 1173 1317 1206 1035 1024 1022 1152 1117 90 90 88 92 89 88 1.75 1195 1352 1226 1061 1042 1101 1200 1206 92 90 89 93 89 88 2 1223 1367 1236 1072 1069 1079 1192 1206 92 90 89 93 89 88 2.25 1232 1368 1251 1081 1069 1090 1193 1187 92 90 89 92 90 88 2.5 1232 1363 1252 1092 1073 1093 1199 1192 93 90 89 95 90 88 2.75 1243 1389 1259 1084 1079 1102 1196 1198 94 90 89 96 90 88 3 1242 1394 1263 1099 1089 1108 1203 1208 93 90 89 94 89 88 3.25 1271 1400 1265 1103 1101 1118 1227 1229 94 90 89 96 89 88 3.5 1262 1443 1279 1101 1114 1123 1237 1248 94 91 89 96 89 88 3.75 1282 1484 1284 1107 1123 1134 1242 1269 94 90 89 96 90 88 4 1285 1481 1288 1109 1130 1150 1244 1276 94 90 89 96 90 88 4.25 1306 1455 1332 1130 1137 1160 1262 1281 93 91 90 96 91 89 4.5 1314 1456 1324 1136 1142 1168 1275 1292 93 91 89 94 91 88 4.75 1291 1441 1310 1138 1145 1162 1280 1299 94 92 89 95 91 88 5 1310 1458 1318 1145 1156 1173 1282 1289 92 91 89 93 91 88 5.25 1319 1483 1336 1160 1167 1177 1289 1307 93 91 91 93 90 89 5.5 1332 1492 1335 1160 1186 1182 1286 1299 93 92 89 92 91 88 5.75 1330 1524 1365 1164 1182 1178 1303 1331 96 92 89 93 91 88 6 1351 1501 1347 1168 1193 1192 1304 1327 97 92 89 95 91 88 6.25 1358 1492 1354 1184 1202 1190 1315 1334 96 92 89 94 92 87 6.5 1338 1509 1341 1183 1194 1196 1299 1314 94 92 89 94 92 88 6.75 1339 1504 1368 1186 1199 1194 1319 1337 96 94 90 95 91 88 7 1338 1521 1361 1187 1204 1200 1313 1335 97 92 89 95 91 88 7.25 1339 1510 1384 1190 1207 1203 1319 1344 95 93 89 94 91 88 7.5 1333 1529 1358 1182 1210 1198 1321 1340 96 93 88 94 92 87 7.75 1338 1493 1356 1181 1205 1198 1318 1341 94 94 89 96 92 87 8 1329 1511 1349 1181 1211 1201 1316 1334 96 94 89 98 92 87 8.25 1341 1507 1349 1182 1209 1202 1310 1336 94 95 89 97 92 88 8.5 1342 1474 1344 1188 1208 1201 1314 1335 94 95 89 97 94 88 8.75 1340 1493 1363 1188 1209 1201 1322 1346 95 96 89 94 93 88 9 1338 1464 1345 1186 1215 1208 1319 1338 94 98 89 95 93 88 9.25 1340 1481 1336 1186 1219 1211 1320 1336 96 99 88 95 91 87 9.5 1347 1496 1370 1193 1212 1206 1322 1354 99 101 89 99 92 88 9.75 1366 1457 1379 1202 1211 1213 1325 1340 102 103 90 99 92 88 10 1337 1485 1363 1196 1216 1211 1325 1350 99 105 89 96 93 88 10.25 1357 1493 1368 1201 1217 1215 1330 1348 100 108 89 97 92 88 10.5 1362 1470 1367 1200 1217 1214 1327 1350 101 110 89 98 92 87 10.75 1362 1475 1372 1209 1216 1226 1321 1349 96 112 90 97 93 89 11 1387 1479 1400 1217 1225 1240 1343 1365 101 115 89 98 92 88 11.25 1372 1488 1393 1216 1222 1235 1336 1364 97 117 89 95 94 88 11.5 1371 1480 1397 1221 1219 1243 1345 1360 96 119 89 96 94 88 11.75 1390 1495 1409 1222 1232 1247 1349 1373 102 120 89 94 95 86 12 1381 1507 1400 1227 1236 1242 1351 1374 99 123 90 95 93 88 12.25 1411 1520 1415 1232 1234 1250 1352 1378 97 124 89 97 94 88 12.5 1396 1479 1412 1238 1232 1244 1350 1372 97 125 89 98 94 88 12.75 1376 1484 1402 1230 1224 1241 1346 1368 96 127 89 94 96 88 13 1374 1519 1412 1232 1232 1251 1348 1383 100 128 89 96 95 88 13.25 1394 1488 1397 1233 1235 1249 1355 1387 99 129 89 95 96 88 13.5 1416 1528 1399 1236 1236 1248 1359 1386 99 129 89 96 94 88 13.75 1384 1472 1382 1228 1240 1255 1357 1375 99 130 90 99 95 88 14 1390 1500 1407 1235 1238 1250 1354 1376 99 131 89 98 97 88 14.25 1386 1488 1401 1238 1245 1280 1367 1398 99 132 89 97 94 88 14.5 1391 1516 1412 1246 1249 1263 1368 1396 98 132 90 96 95 0 Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 29 of 45 Beyer Material Scienc LLC Project No. 3194245SAT-M B 19 August 2009 Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Pass/ Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall T1me TC 441 TC 442 TC 043 TC 044 TC 045 TC M TC #47 TC 048 TC #49 TC #50 TC #51 TC 052 TC 053 TC 054 (min) ('F) IV) 1'FI ('F) IT) (°F) (°F) 1°F) (°F) (T) (T) ('F) ('fl CF) 14.75 1386 1518 1401 1241 1245 1254 1365 1388 98 133 90 94 97 88 15 1419 1528 1424 1255 1251 1282 1371 1400 103 134 90 93 94 88 15.25 1452 1596 1474 1281 1287 1322 1429 1455 104 134 90 96 96 88 15.5 1462 1619 1465 1292 1307 1335 1454 1475 100 134 91 98 94 88 15.75 1492 1627 1508 1308 1320 1340 1460 1488 99 135 90 96 96 88 18 1484 1887 1504 1316 1317 1347 1486 1486 100 134 91 96 96 88 16.25 1503 1636 1517 1325 1330 1359 1474 1497 96 134 91 95 96 88 16.5 1507 1630 1506 1326 1329 1352 1476 1501 100 135 91 99 97 89 16.75 1512 1651 1524 1334 1333 1359 1490 1512 102 135 91 99 95 88 17 1504 1643 1532 1336 1336 1355 1484 1509 104 134 91 96 96 88 17.25 1502 1653 1502 1330 1351 1361 1493 1520 99 135 92 97 95 88 17.5 1508 1646 1538 1342 1350 1390 1492 1512 101 135 92 98 94 88 17.73 1518 1642 1525 1340 1344 1390 1495 1512 106 133 93 97 97 89 18 1531 1653 1532 1346 1346 1380 1495 1529 102 134 92 97 95 89 18.25 1502 1627 1535 1343 1352 1395 1522 1531 103 135 93 97 98 89 18.5 1529 1664 1510 1344 1351 1377 1509 1535 104 135 94 98 98 89 18.75 1529 1658 1537 1350 1354 1390 1512 1522 105 135 95 100 97 92 19 1512 1660 1535 1344 1358 1391 1520 1536 106 135 94 102 99 91 19.25 1538 1661 1527 1353 1362 1398 1519 1538 107 135 94 100 98 90 115 1545 1653 1537 1355 1358 1400 1513 1538 102 135 93 101 97 89 19.75 1520 1630 1529 1354 1359 1407 1516 1538 106 135 93 100 95 89 20 1523 1640 1554 1364 1364 1414 1526 1549 108 134 93 97 98 90 20.25 1527 1668 1529 1357 1381 1407 1506 1537 105 135 93 101 96 90 20.5 1525 1630 1510 1356 1359 1419 1524 1551 106 136 94 101 96 90 20.75 1523 1684 1515 1356 1370 1414 1524 1545 106 135 93 103 98 90 21 1529 1831 1545 1360 1369 1419 1527 1555 105 135 95 102 96 91 21.25 1534 1832 1538 1365 1370 1415 1539 1580 104 137 94 100 98 90 21.5 1536 1682 1544 1365 1375 1414 1533 1546 108 137 95 100 98 90 21.75 1554 1842 1537 1367 1370 1411 1532 15% 104 137 97 100 96 91 22 1567 1646 1547 1376 1370 1419 1539 1561 104 136 94 102 98 90 22.25 1548 1656 1572 1380 1371 1424 1545 1570 99 137 95 97 97 90 22.5 1556 1664 1550 1377 1376 1427 1541 1563 104 137 96 100 99 91 22.75 1552 1710 1563 1385 1382 1433 1535 1572 116 136 94 101 97 90 23 1562 1685 1576 1381 1381 1440 1540 1568 108 136 95 103 97 90 23.25 1567 1887 1562 1390 1383 1445 1549 1567 103 136 94 100 96 90 23.5 1561 1679 1555 1384 1387 1432 1359 1582 108 137 93 102 100 91 23.75 1541 1657 1563 1391 1379 1435 1551 1577 109 136 96 101 96 90 24 1559 1702 1564 1387 1384 1447 1546 1580 104 137 95 101 100 90 24.25 1557 1680 1569 1391 1392 1444 1556 1587 105 137 95 106 100 91 24.5 1572 1697 1560 1393 1399 1444 1556 1590 102 136 97 101 100 91 24.75 1562 1685 1577 1397 1395 1450 1565 1587 104 137 96 102 97 92 25 1576 1670 1595 1411 1402 1459 1581 1597 103 137 96 101 99 91 25.25 1617 1731 1631 1430 1423 1486 1618 1632 103 135 95 103 98 91 25.5 1633 1690 1627 1432 1420 1494 1638 1652 105 137 96 101 99 91 25.75 1612 1732 1592 1430 1433 1502 1627 1660 103 136 97 103 98 91 26 1613 1723 1600 1425 1434 1505 1626 1663 105 136 97 101 98 91 26.25 1604 1755 1590 1425 1445 1504 1622 1650 115 137 96 104 101 91 26.5 1638 1707 1593 1431 1441 1506 1641 1678 118 135 97 105 102 91 26.75 1628 1728 1607 1435 1443 1518 1632 1669 111 135 95 107 99 91 REVIEWED BY SAF=bu.0,. o.farado Bayer Material Science, LLC August 20, 2009 Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B Page 30 of 45 Beyer Material Scienc LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-00113 19 August 2009 Pass/ Pahl Pass/ Pus! Pass/ Pass/ Fail Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Tlme TC 041 TC 842 TC 843 TC 0" TC $45 TC N" TC #47 TC 048 TC 049 TC 050 TC 051 TC #52 TC 853 TC 054 (min) ('F) 1'F) IT) ('F) ('F) (°F) (°F) (F) (°F) CF) ('F) ('F) ('F) ('F) 27 1618 1744 1609 1438 1457 1504 1638 1680 107 135 96 107 98 91 27.25 1648 1750 1614 1440 1449 1516 1637 1872 110 135 97 104 97 91 27.3 1660 1754 1631 1448 1452 1518 1637 1880 106 135 96 106 98 91 27.75 1652 1758 1610 1445 1453 1518 1632 1664 114 134 97 103 101 91 28 1700 1761 1612 1451 1451 1521 1642 1683 116 134 96 107 101 92 29.25 1736 1778 1624 1452 1453 1525 1649 1704 113 135 97 103 99 91 US 1897 1802 1616 1451 1469 1537 1654 1709 114 134 96 107 98 91 28.75 1663 1796 1591 1450 1473 1540 1667 1709 119 134 98 104 99 93 29 1709 1762 1599 1447 1464 1540 1653 1702 113 134 98 106 100 92 29.25 1686 1757 1599 1451 1468 1543 1669 1722 115 133 97 104 100 92 28.5 1670 1757 1604 1454 1474 1550 1869 1708 112 133 96 107 102 91 29.75 1690 1810 1616 1458 1476 1555 1658 1708 112 134 98 102 100 92 30 1688 1799 1624 1460 1472 1560 1674 1725 110 133 97 105 101 91 30.25 1465 1487 1431 1356 1363 1387 1494 1483 107 133 98 105 100 92 30.5 1234 1259 1202 1174 1172 1173 1283 1255 108 131 98 105 100 92 30.75 1125 1162 1090 1067 1066 1059 1186 1139 115 131 99 104 96 93 31 1052 1095 1020 995 997 961 1139 1071 107 132 104 104 95 102 31.25 1002 1036 970 945 944 926 1086 1012 105 132 106 100 96 103 31.5 960 991 930 905 905 889 1030 968 110 133 113 103 95 106 31.75 925 958 899 871 873 855 1032 933 115 131 111 104 95 105 32 896 927 874 845 847 829 986 904 113 131 110 104 95 107 32.25 860 889 841 816 818 793 911 888 101 131 112 95 102 109 325 820 847 805 783 783 756 859 837 96 132 121 97 108 106 32.75 791 819 777 754 751 723 826 809 98 132 127 98 113 115 33 764 795 753 729 729 701 798 785 98 132 116 97 112 106 33.25 742 772 730 709 708 652 776 764 96 133 118 96 113 106 33.5 724 751 712 690 688 663 752 738 99 132 122 96 111 110 33.75 704 733 694 673 670 644 732 717 99 132 117 98 110 106 U 687 717 679 657 656 626 713 701 97 133 116 97 116 109 34.25 674 702 666 643 641 620 698 687 97 133 117 97 115 108 34.5 661 685 650 628 625 603 675 672 96 132 126 97 117 109 34.75 647 670 837 615 612 582 662 658 96 132 121 98 114 110 35 635 659 625 603 599 573 649 645 96 132 119 96 118 109 35.25 624 647 612 592 589 562 638 633 97 132 113 95 116 107 35.3 612 634 600 580 579 550 627 621 98 133 117 96 113 110 33.75 600 623 590 570 568 541 617 610 100 132 114 98 112 106 36 592 612 580 561 560 532 608 600 98 131 110 96 110 105 36.25 582 605 572 553 552 527 599 592 97 131 110 97 112 102 36.5 576 595 564 544 543 517 589 582 96 131 112 96 112 105 36.75 568 587 556 536 535 509 580 572 98 131 115 96 110 108 37 558 578 548 528 528 500 575 563 98 131 110 98 115 107 37.25 550 569 541 521 521 493 567 556 97 130 110 95 117 106 37.5 544 561 334 514 515 487 564 548 97 128 113 96 113 109 37.75 537 554 527 507 508 482 559 540 97 130 112 98 112 104 38 530 546 521 501 502 474 556 534 98 129 105 97 110 99 38.25 523 540 515 495 497 467 549 528 97 130 106 97 110 102 38.5 517 533 510 490 490 463 544 522 99 129 107 96 111 102 38.75 511 527 504 484 484 454 538 516 98 130 108 97 112 104 39 504 520 497 479 479 450 534 510 98 129 101 99 108 97 39.25 498 514 492 474 474 448 528 501 100 127 101 107 111 98 38.5 492 509 487 488 469 439 521 497 98 129 110 102 114 104 39.75 486 504 481 462 463 437 514 493 99 129 116 98 114 108 40 480 499 476 457 458 430 507 487 99 130 113 97 118 103 Max Temp 1738 1810 1631 1460 1478 1560 1674 1725 119 137 127 107 117 115 Max Allowed 589 589 588 588 587 587 Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B APPENDIX C Photographs August 20, 2009 Page 31 of 45 REVIEWED BY FSEP 2 , 2009 SAFEbuitt Colorado Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B ..~...s August 20, 2009 Page 32 of 45 WED BY 5EN 2 5 -SAEFnjiiir rnlnrmrI^ Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B BAYSEALCc66 {8f2tgB KWIC OQpASnVkTV&#vr• 1pAlrJ~I I`xJ r>~7-91 a.a OP'~►y~ (iG1 D~ch,>r ry'(nt•IhJnC 4. ncrr.NWM 111'01 i ~q0 bMiN t~N;+ aca ~ rir IOT # PA860oO621 ,xiuu~iinNUniii ianm on: 0610112009 81218669 2SYIIYWtlIAIlAlleldpN August 20, 2009 Page 33 of 45 40 SEP 25 2dus SAFEbuilt Colorado Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B `-Z6-aI August 20, 2009 Page 34 of 45 -Htv-Ik:vvtu by •rado Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 35 of 45 Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 36 of 45 ED BY i 2099 m Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B J August 20, 2009 Page 37 of 45 • REVIEWED gY FSEP 2 5 2009 Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 38 of 45 Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 39 of 45 _ t Intertek Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 40 of 45 Intertek Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B 0 j 4 -0 -Ad V» 4 ti a a f7 August 20, 2009 Page 41 of 45 ED BY ~ 209 Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 42 of 45 WED BY j SEP 2 5 [000 Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B August 20, 2009 Page 43 of 45 KI:VIEVVED BY Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B tom- Ems: ri ~ t August 20, 2009 Page 44 of 45 its -d!,- *-I-%' 0119190101:09 t' ~D BY SAN 209 Bayer Material Science, LLC Project No. 3184245SAT-001 B REVISION SUMMARY August 20, 2009 Page 45 of 45 DATE SUMMARY August 20, 2009 Original Issue REVIEWED By ESEP 2 2009 SAFEbuilr Colorado TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No...: 210107101016 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR HYDER CONSTRUCTION, INC 543 SANTA FE DRIVE DENVER CO 80204 License: 109-A APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS 600 FOSHAY TOWER 821 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 License: 0000001981 07/19/2006 Permit # B06-0196 Project PRJ03-0468 Status ISSUED Applied..: 07/18/2006 Issued . 06/26/2009 Expires. 09/26/2007 06/11/2009 Phone: 303-825-1313 07/19/2006 Phone: 612-332-1500 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Occupancy Type NIGHT CLUBS (A2) ZONE 4 IB CHURCHES (A3) ZONE 4 IB BUSINESS(B)& HMP (H5 ZONE 4 IB EDUCATIONAL (E) ZONE 4 ID INDUSTRIAL/MOD HAZ ( ZONE 4 IB MERCANTILE (M) ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/HOTELS ( ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/MULTFAM( ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/MOD HAZ (Sl) ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/LOW HAZ(S2) ZONE 4 ID Totals... TOV Adjusted Valuation: 3,237,002.91 Revision Valuation: Factor Sq Feet Valuation 299.08 27,353 $8,180,735.24 369.90 8,605 $3,182,989.50 300.40 31,130 $9,351,452.00 322.53 670 $216,095.10 183.77 29,600 $5,439,592.00 220.56 2,445 $539,269.20 302.22 86,991$26,290,420.02 250.22 133,695$33,453,162.90 169.75 23,080 $3,917,830.00 167.15 75,773$12,665,456.95 399,510$103,237,002.9* $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $237,002.91 *a::ssr*►****►s****+*►:*****a*****s•*************+*****#+s* FEE SUMMARY *****+*****w**s**s»•s****:*s**s*ss*****es*****s***s:►es## Building > 378, 777.45 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees 157, 177.90 Plan Check 378, 777.45 Recreation Fee--------------> 399, 510.00 Additional Fees-----------> $9,195.00 Investigation-> $0.00 TOTAL FEES > 157, 177.90 Total Permit Fee---------- > 166, 372.90 Will Call-----> $3.00 Payments > 166, 372.90 BALANCE DUE--------> $0. 00 Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e-mailed to applicant. 12/18/2006 cdavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set for plan c stamped by TOV 12/13/06. An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer. 03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR:1215- G&E permit approval only. Conditic apply. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only 06/12/2007 CDAVIS Action: PA Tower Crane footing pads. No additional fees assessed 07/16/2007 jplano Action: CR Additional work being requested to be adde( phasing, correction letter sent. 08/01/2007 jplano Action: CR Second correction letter sent, insuffient information supplied. 3) The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested added to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design profession architect and/or engineer. The design professionals are to verify that the additi( work being requested is not in conflict with the corrections that are requested regard: full building permit. All sheets are to be stamped and signed by the associated design professional. The architectural and the plumbing sheets have not been stamped. The stamp on the stri sheets has not been signed. The stamp on the electrical sheets has not been signe( 4 There is insufficient detail to approve this submittal. Some examples are: a) There are several sections that are pertinent to this request that are not pros b) The elevator pit sections 10/54.04, 18/54.04, 19/S4.04, 20/54.04 are missing. c) Ramp transition section 22/56.01, 6/56.01, 7/S4.04 are missing d) Exterior foundation wall connection to the matt slab 9/S6.01D, 27/56.01, 6/S.0: 7/56.01 e) Sump pit details 28/S4.04 and 29/54.04 f) Column schedule, transition of the columns to slab? g) Slab steps 11/S6.01D. This review has stopped because of lack of information. 5 The Public Works Department in Vail has not approved the submittal for additionz to be added to the phasing. Their approval will be necessary. 08/06/2007 jplano Action: PA Additional work approved for phasing. Under plumbing, underground electrical, rebar and concrete placement for elevator and st pits. NO APPROVAL FOR MAT SLAB only 09/11/2007 jplano Action: AP 10/22/2007 DPLACE Action: PA No charge. 10/22/2007 dplace Action: PA CHARGE. 11/13/2007 ependley Action: AP stamps. No added valuation. 11/15/2007 ependley Action: AP valuation. Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 11/30/2007 jplano Action: AP valuation. Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 12/18/2007 JPLANO Action: AP tension slabs, no added valuation 12/26/2007 jplano Action: AP cable with thickened slab. $120.00 due 12/27/2007 MROYER Action: AP for appropiate stamps, no charge 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA Full permit approved, see conditions REV 4 IR 5881: Approved shop drawings tor ; REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAL REV5/IR6042. Approved shop drawings for de: Rev7/IR6058. Approved RFI-0237, No added Rev6/IR6057. Approved RFI-0221, No added Rev9/IR6236. Approved shop drawings for po: Rev10/IR6252. Approved changing a post ten: Revll/IR6266,6267. Rebar shop drawings rev: REV 12 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER LAYTON Si #05510-004 (EMBEDS @ LEVEL 1, 2, 3 ns 4) FROM JT STEEL NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA EV.13 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER SUBMITTAL 016 (STUD RAILS, LEVELS 4 & 5) FROM SUNCOAST NO ADDTIONAL CHARGE 06/10/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev14,15,16, IR6685,6687,7744 are approved hours of plan review due, $720.00 07/08/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 19, IR 7989 are approved, Bulletins 10,25,29,31,35,40 - 8 hours of plan review due, $480.00 08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev17, IR 7777 are approved, Bulletins 023 023A, swimming pool revisions, $360 due 08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 20, IR8245 are approved, storm and sewE connetions outside the building, public works has approved it. No charge from Sat( 09/29/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev18, IR7988 are approved. The sub-duct si for the dryers and range hoods are not approved. 46 hours of plan review due = $2760.( 12/04/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev22/IR9384 - This is the revised ADMOD t( exter ior wood above 40'. This is to be approved by the fire department to be issued. No chi from SB 12/18/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev23/IR9488, Additional fire-stopping subr approved, no charge 01/02/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev21/IR9008, Approved Bulletins 036, 037, 040, 043, 044, 050, 051, 052, 055, 056 and firestopping submittal. 055, generator fueling needs fire department approval prior to issuance 056, deck extention needs DRB approval prior to issuance 29 hours of plan review due=$1740.00 02/09/2009 jplano Action: NA Rev24/IR9666 - Fire Alarm Plans to be apprc the fire department 02/09/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev25/IR9587 - 113M Fire Resistive Wrap 15A' approved for HVAC ducting as shown on apporved plans. 2 hours of plan review Due=$120.00 02/10/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev26/IR9663 - Subduct system for resident: dryer by value system approved. 8 hours of plan review due=$480.00 04/16/2009 jplano Action: CR Rev27, IR9840 - Bulletins 59-73, correctioi sent, revisions needed and full sized drawings for collation 04/23/2009 jplano Action: CR Rev28, IR9926 - Submittal to be stamped an( FPE. This is the exit passageway conditions. 05/28/2009 ependley Action: AP Rev28/IR9926 approved. No added valuation. plan review at $240.00 06/18/2009 jeaton Action: AP REV 27/IR # 9840 approved by Safebuilt. No & no added square footage Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/20/2006 Warren Invoiced 10 Hours of Plan Review at $600.00 Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the He Cross Utility relocation permit request. The applicant shall remove only those trees wh: absolutely necessary for the utility relocation work. 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the application to dewater the site. 03/31/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning recieved a bond to cover the Grad: Excavation in the amount of 3.2 million. Planning has approved the grading and ex( permit. 06/25/2007 Warren Action: COND Planning has approved the full building pei dated recieved on May 29, 2007, with a single condition. A complete Design Review aplication will need to be submitted for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive. 08/20/2007 Warren Action: AP The set of plans provided to allow fro the of some work prior to release of a full building permit has been approved. The plans date stamped July 26, 2007 09/05/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning is approving the set of plans date August 3, 2007, with the condition that the applicant submits a revised landscaping plan foi and approval prior to requesting a TCO. 11/02/2007 GRUTHER Action: AP CHARGE. 06/12/2008 Warren Action: AP and REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAI The planning departmetn signs off on Bullei 23A with one condition. The gate on teh new set of stairs shat be as the base of t stairs on the pool deck not on the top of the stairs adjacent to Meadow Drive. 09/26/2008 Warren Action: CR Regarding the above permit my only comment I Four need a detail of the gate at the top of the stairs serving as an exit trom the poc This detail shall be depict the desired gate which tits not only the aesthetics of Season but that of the Meadow Drive streetscape. The design should take into accoi need for security trom the public side of the tence and be design with this in mind. Fc example the Town does not want to see a nice gate submitted, approved, and installed and t because of security reason we add a piece of plexi-glass to the gate as an atterthought. plans are dated 5-8-08 Bullentin #40. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received 04/17/06. Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding. Review: Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied: 1. Fire Dept staging on south side of project is shown on east end. The apporved on the west end. The hydrant on the west end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on south side. Sheet A0.3.00 2. Sheet A0.3.05 does not show an acceptable route to the interior of the buildinc the Fire Command Center. 3. The plans submitted by RJA are not stamped and are labeled "Not for Constructic 4. The plans show a dead end corridor behind the front desk. 5. 12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is gi Relocate electrical disconnect to the trailer or provide ready access on southwest of site. Location as proposed on plan submitted 12/13/06 is not accepted. 03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: PA g and e permit is approved 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E only 07/11/2007 McGee Action: AP Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3A approved for is work as submitted 7 11 07 . 09/07/2007 McGee Action: AP The full permit is approved as noted: Life Safety Report 5 22 07 1. LSR, MOU's, and Admin Mod's must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protect: Engineer of Record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not accepted. RJA alledgedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence ha: been presented. 3. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans, is not accepted. 5. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additions review. 12/08/2008 MAH Action: AP Rev21/IR9008 - This is the revised ADMOD fc exterior wood above 401. This is to be approved by the fire department to be issued. No chE from SB. PER VERBAL FROM MIKE VAUGHAN, OK TO APPROVE FOR FIRE. 02/25/2009 drhoades Action: AP Permanent location of FDC for South side of building. 03/26/2009 mcgee Action: AP Sub duct revisions 1 27 09 per RJA 1. Add clean out of lint traps to OEM manual for project. Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 10/20/2006 is Action: DN Awaiting for additional information 12/20/2006 is Action: PA Approval to allow grading and prep work foi installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for t site access for small construction vehicles ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive. 03/26/2007 is Action: PA Staging plan for Phase 1 of the G&E permit approved only. Engineer approval for the G&E permit still required currently under review. staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only 08/07/2007 csalli Action: AP additional work proposed for phased permit approved, no approval for mat slab 09/13/2007 csalli Action: DN waiting for executed MOU 10/04/2007 TK Action: AP Approved Building Permit with the condtion: in the memo dated 8/5/07 from Chad Salli. 07/31/2008 csalli Action: AP revised sheets C17, C20 dated 7/18/08 and C18, C18A, C19 dated 7/1/08 approved Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS Item: 05700 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEF~I4T 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM 4 PM. j OF OWNER OR3R?~CTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit # B06-0196 as of 06-26-2009 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS J. BRINK 612-332-1500 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Conditions: Cond: CON0008815 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3/28/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 Applied: 07/18/2006 Issued: 06/26/2009 To Expire: 09/26/2007 The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the full building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original comment number for clarity. General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule" to prevent a room that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor". The Fire and Life Safety Report prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants. These will be required for full permit issuance. General: The Fire & Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved prior to the approval for full building permit. 3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units 3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is discharging. 8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C-414, is actually a horizontal portion of Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or remove the designation of passageway. 10) See the general comment above. 11) See the general comment above. 12) See the general comment above. 13) See the general comment above. 16) See the general comment above. 22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be tested in accordance with ASTME 119, tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire-resistance rating not less than the fire-resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the window when responding for full building permit. 23) See the general comment above. 39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures. Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly. This item has no impact on the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building permit issuance. 42) See response the comment number 39. 46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space is not accessory. 46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 210A as there is no access to stair Q. Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel. 49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved by the Town of Vail's Building Official. 57 through 61 and 149) The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 14 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 17 (BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FRJ INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED Cond: 35 (P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: 5 (PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEMF LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPR SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC. Cond: CON0009095 The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review aplication for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs added from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive, within 30 days of the release of the building permit. Cond: CON0009121 The applicant shall submit a seperate Design Review application for review and approval for all signage design, locations, and materials prior to installation. Cond: CON0009294 The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan which addresses the landscaping conflicts created by the shallow soild depths on the culvert containing Spraddle Creek. This plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to requesting a certifcate of occupancy. Cond: CON0009330 SAFEbuilt Colorado Conditions of Approval To: Layton Construction Re: Full Building Permit Conditions of Approval The following conditions will be required to be addressed prior to construction. Sufficient time shall be granted for review, response and approval before work is initiated. Building Department- The items listed within the building department comments are numbered to correspond with the 3 round comment letter dated 08/21/2007. 46. Change the exiting from Vestibule 210A. It appears to exit through intervening room that is not accessory to the vestibule. HGA Response: We submit that the adjacent space is accessory. Vestibule 210A services mechanical rooms and the service elevators. To exit from Vestibule 210A the occupants have to pass through Vestibule 275A, which is basically for the spa staff, then through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area, then to hallway 279, then through exit passageway 293, then through exit passageway 297, then to exit discharge. The issue is that the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area is not accessory to the mechanical rooms. It is accessory for the rooms off Vestibule 275A for the staff of the spa but not the mechanical areas. Please change the layout accordingly. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Vestibule 210A is purely circulation space and does not carry an occupant load. This vestibule provides connection between the Spa and the service elevators, IDF Room 210, and Mechanical Room 257. Relative to egress, it provides the egress route for the one occupant from IDF 210 and the one occupant from Mechanical 257 (as shown on A0.3.02). IDF 210, Mechanical 257, Vestibule 210A, and Service Elevator Lobby E-202 are considered to be part of the overall Spa as they serve Spa functions. The service elevators stop at this location solely to provide connection to the Spa. IDF 210 houses audio-visual, telephone, and data system equipment that specifically serves the Spa and must be accessed by Spa personnel. Similarly, Mechanical 257 houses the equipment serving the pools within Room 255 and must be accessed by Spa staff. In summary, we submit that all these spaces are part of the overall Spa and are "accessory" to each other. Therefore, current layout provides egress that complies with IBC 1013.2 as the spaces are accessory, are not hazard occupancies, and provide a discernible path of travel to an exit. This comment is in reference to the electrical room #212. Please revise 64. A2.03.1 - Wall tag both shafts located in room 304 (storage room). Wall tags must reference an approved assembly from the partition schedule. HGA Response: Wall tag has been added. One shaft in room 304 does not have wall tags. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The drawing has been updated to include wall tags for this shaft. Still have one shaft not tagged Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. 152. Provide accessible parking spaces per IBC Table 1106.1. Providing 212 spaces would require 7 to be accessible, 2 of those to be van accessible. Verify 98" of vertical clearance for the van spots. HGA Response: We submit that the number of accessible parking stalls complies with IBC Table 1106.1 and section 1106.5. The hotel is operating on 100% valet parking stalls, with an additional 59 self-park stalls for fractional ownership, full ownership, and employee. Per Table 1106.1, 3 stalls are required for the self-parking, and at least one of the three is required to be van accessible. Plan sheet A0.3.01 indicates there are 228 parking spaces. Spaces marked for Valet parking number 78. With those counts, Table 1106.1.3 would require 5 accessible spaces with one van accessible space. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Per previous response, most of the parking spaces are valet only. There are 59 self-park stalls that will be allocated to fractional ownership, full ownership condos, and employees. The drawings have been updated to identify each space as either valet or self-park. We submit that only the 59 self-park stalls are considered per Table 1106.1 and that the number of accessible spaces required are provided. Deducting the 78 Valet parking from the total spaces, you are still required to add two additional accessible spaces for a total number of 5 accessible spaces. 155. All the massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. Please amend the toilet facilities, changing rooms, lavatories, tubs and the showers meet to accessibility requirements of the ANSI A117.1-98. (IBC 1109.14.3) HGA Response: We submit the Wet Massage Suite #289 complies with the accessibility requirements of ANSI A117.1-98 (IBC 1109.14.3). All massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We disagree that IBC 1109.14.3 requires that ALL spa treatment rooms be accessible. IBC 1109.14 pertains to "recreational facilities". If the Spa is going to be considered a "recreational facility" then it should be considered as a whole. As such, the Spa is accessible - it provides accessibility at the entry/reception, locker rooms, toilets, showers, whirlpools, lounges, treatment rooms, etc. We submit that nothing requires ALL treatment rooms to be accessible any more than ALL lockers, ALL toilets, or ALL showers. Add grab bars at the tub in room 289 for accessibility. 167. We are unable to locate a designated accessible Type "A" condominium per Section 1107.6.2 of the 2003 IBC. As the condominiums are a different type of R-2 occupancy from the time-share units, an accessible Type "A" condominium is required. HGA Response: Since only 16 condominiums are proposed, no Type "A" units are required. Refer to IBC 1107.6.2.1.1. With the condominiums, employee housing and timeshare units there are a total of 63 units classified as an R-2 occupancy group. Per Section 1107.6.2.1.1 Type A units shall be dispersed among the various classes of units. Therefore a Type A accessible unit is required in each of the following groups: the condominiums, the employee housing, and the timeshare units. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): To resolve this issue we have revised Condo #8 (on Level 9, sheet A4.28.1)) to be a "Type A" unit per ICC/ANSI A117.1. Two accessible employee housing units and one accessible timeshare unit are already provided and indicated on the drawings. Comment 169-180 - Submit a Memorandum of Understanding to the Town of Vail for approval by the Building Official to reference the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1. If accepted by the town, please revise entire plan to comply with the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1 in its entirety. If not accepted please revise plans per 1998 ANSI A-117.1 and comments above. 169. In the accessible units in the guest rooms of the R-1 occupancy, all bathing & toilet facilities are required to be accessible per Chapter 6 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: We submit that the accessible units include the accessible bathing and toilet facilities and comply with Chapter 6 of ANSI A 117.1. Plan sheet A4.07.1 A and A4.07.1 B for Unit PR-HC shows a raised platform in media room # 116 which does not have an accessible route. Also, bathrooms/rooms 4103, 4108, # 109, # 110, # 133 do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The raised platform within Media 116 is intended to provide tiered seating within this "home theater". We submit that an accessible route is not required for this small platform as it is less than 25% of the overall room and the remainder of the room is accessible. While this room is not an "assembly" space, we submit that IBC 1108.2.4.1, exception 2 provides guidance regarding this room. See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.06.1 for Unit 2KK-HC has bathrooms/rooms # 103, 4108 which do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.05.3 for Unit 1 K-HC has bathroom # 103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.04AA for Unit ES2-HC has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.01.1 for Unit K1-H1 has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Unit type K1-HI is a unit for the hearing impaired. It is not an accessible unit. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We submit that only one accessible bathroom is required within an accessible hotel unit. This requirement is consistent with the federal standard - ADAAG Chapter 9. To interpret IBC Chapter 11 as requiring that ALL bathrooms must be accessible is to raise the standard beyond the federal requirements. We submit that this is not reasonable, does not reflect industry standard, and is not the intent of the IBC / ICC. Rather, we submit that the IBC / ICC intends to coordinate and correlate with the federal standards. As an example, we can examine the accessibility requirements for condominiums. The federal standard is the FHA Fair Housing Design Manual. This document allows condo units to be provided with one "Specification B" bathroom and that is the highest level of accessibility. Similarly, the 2003 edition of ICC / ANSI A117.1 has been revised to better correlate to FHA and require that "Type A" units provide "at least one" accessible bathroom . The common thread is the requirement is for one or "at least one" accessible bathroom - not all. Since the ADAAG, FHA Design Manual, and A117 (2003) all require one or "at least one" accessible bathroom it is reasonable to interpret the IBC's requirements in the same manner. Otherwise, all the hotel units would be held to a higher standard than the condominium units within the same building. 170. In Type "A" dwelling units of the R-2 occupancies, all toilet and bathing facilities must comply with Sections 1002.11.1 through 1002.11.7 of ANSI A 117.1. Some Type "A" dwelling units have bathrooms which do not comply. Please clarify. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We request that ICC/ANSI Al 17.1 - 2003 be used as the applicable edition relative to the "Type A" condominium. This is the most recent version of Al 17 and our research has found that the various revisions in Chapter 10 were intended to correct the intent of various provisions and to better coordinate with federal requirements (FHA and ADA). Per 1003.11.1 of the A] 17-2003, at least one bathroom is required to comply with 1003.11. This correlates with FHA requirements ("Specification B" bathrooms) and Chapter 9 of the ADA. Therefore, we submit that the latest intent of the various codes and standards is that at least one bathroom, but not all, is required to comply with 1003.11. 171. In Type "A" dwelling units, a permanent seat is required at the head end of the bathtub per Section 607 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): ICC/ANSI A117.1 - 1998, 607.3 states that a permanent seat OR a removable in-tub seat shall be provided. However, 1002.11.6, exception 1, states that the removable in-tub seat required by 607.3 is NOT required. Since 607.3 gives the option of either permanent or removable seats, we submit that the true intent of 1002.11.6, exception 1 is to NOT require either type of seat. ICC / ANSI A 117.1 - 2003 carries similar language, but also includes Figure 1003.11.8 (a) to clarify that the seat (permanent or removable) can be omitted. 172. In Type "A" dwelling units, clearance in front of bathtubs shall extend the length of the bathtub and shall be 30 inches wide minimum per Section 607 of ANSI A 117.1. Some of the bathtubs have lavatories encroaching into the required clearances. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required bathtub clear floor area is indicated. 173. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.11.1 of ANSI A117.1, doors shall not swing into the clear floor or ground space or clearance for any fixture, unless a clear floor space of 30 inches minimum by 48 inches minimum is located beyond the arc of the door swing. There are water closet compartments and some other bathroom areas that do not meet those requirements. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. The door swings do not swing into the other clear floor spaces. 174. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.13 of ANSI A117.1, where operable windows are provided, at least one window in each sleeping, living, or dining space shall have operable parts complying with Section 1002.13 of ANSI A117.1. All windows of "accessible units" shall comply with Section 309 of ANSI A117.1, Operable Parts. Provide documentation showing compliance. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. A note has been added to indicate requirement that all operable windows (and sliding doors) comply with 1002.13. 175. For Type "A" and "accessible units", provide details showing accessibility compliance for the operable parts of the showers, lavatory height, lavatory knee and toe clearance, and bathroom mirror height per Section 1002.11 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to interior elevations shown within the Interior Design drawings. I am unable to locate the Interior Design Drawings in the plan set submitted. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to accessibility details illustrated on sheet A0.4.3. 180. For Type "A" dwelling units, provide details showing accessibility compliance for kitchen work surfaces, sinks, range controls, and refrigerator/freezer requirements per Section 1002.12 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required kitchen features are illustrated. 183. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the condominiums, some "U" shaped kitchens do not have the required 60 inch minimum clearance between opposing base cabinets per Section 1003.12 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Sheets A4.22.1, A4.25.1, and A4.30.1 have been revised to provide 60" clearance at U-shaped kitchens. Provide corrected plan sheets. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These sheets are included in the 7/18/07 resubmittal set. 185. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the time share units, the water closets do not have required clearances and some doors encroach required clearances per Section 1003.11.2 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Refer to the response to comment 4186 below. As such, there are no Type "B" timeshare units. See response to comment # 186. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to response to comment #186. 186. Is Option "A" being used for the bathroom fixtures in the Type "B", Time-share units? If so, each fixture is required to meet the requirements of the option per Section 1003.11.3.1 of ANSI A 117.1. Please clarify. HGA Response: As previously discussed and resolved, the timeshare units are transient occupancy (similar to hotel units) and not residences. As such, one accessible timeshare unit is provided per IBC Table 1107.6.1.1. This accessible unit is #3103 located on Level 03. The enlarged plan for this accessible unit is on sheet A4.12.IA and the associated H/C bathroom in 2/A4.12.2A. Provide signed letters from persons representing the operating authority for this facility stating that the timeshare units will not be used as residences. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These letters will be submitted by ownership 203. Enclose both mechanical rooms on the 9th level in 2 hour rated construction, it appears that the 2 hour shafts from below terminate in these rooms. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet M4.06 (Part Plan Attachment No. M06). The Area 3A mechanical room is unrated, and the 2 hour rated vertical risers through the building through the 8th floor slab. In order to avoid the installation of inaccessible fire dampers at the top of the riser, RYBKA have revised sheet M4.06 to ductwork is to be fire rated in the attic space. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. The Area 3B mechanical room is a 2 hour rated room that ends at column line A 14. The ductwork that extends to the south across column line A14 is 2 hour fire rated to avoid the installation of fire dampers in inaccessible locations. Fire dampers are shown in the penetrations of the two hour rated Area 3B mechanical room, where ductwork exist the mechanical room. A) The mechanical room on the 9th level over "AREA-03A"has not been addressed on the plan sheets. The partial ninth floor plan on 8 ''/z" x 11" indicate wrapping ducts. If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. Ductwork is to be wrapped to provide 2 hour fire rating in attic space. (Refer to Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03). Provide architectural details rated enclosure. B) In the mechanical room labeled 911 the rated walls do not appear to enclose the room entirely. The wall is labeled 30 minutes on the north end and the wall is labeled 1 hour where Trash 912 (above "AREA-0313") is located on sheet A0.3.09. There are 3 duct penetrations in this area to be addressed, 28x10 S/E F/B, 24x18 G/e F/B and 24x14 S/A F/A T/B. Rybka Response: Refer to Architectural Sheet A0.3.09 where Mechanical Room 911 is to be provided with 2 hour rating. Three ducts identified enter riser shaft from Mechanical Room 911 and riser is considered to be connected to and form part of mechanical room and so no fire smoke damper is provided. The ducts in question enter a shaft in the floor below within Maid Room G-711. Fire/Smoke Dampers are required where these ducts enter the shaft. One duct is not in a shaft. Please address accordingly. C) How will the 2 hour shaft assembly be maintained at EF-14 and EF-30? If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be rated for operation within rated enclosures by fan manufacturer or are to be relocated within Mechanical Room 911. Provide architectural details for the shafts. 214. Add a fire/smoke damper to the penetration by the 8x6 duct that penetrates the 30 minute fire partition on page M2.08.1 on grid line 11 and between A9 and A10. Rybka Response: Fire dampers are not required in one hour rated fire barriers per IMC 607.5.2. (Refer to Response No. 208.) This is not a fire barrier; it is a fire partition defining a rated corridor. A fire/smoke damper is required for this duct. Rybka Response: Combination fire smoke damper is provided where this duct exits the rated shaft. The response indicates an Vs damper has been added to the duct as exits the rated shaft. A smoke damper is required where it penetrates the rated corridor. 215. Fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Rybka Response: Mechanical floor plan sheets, sheets M2.01.1 thru M2.11.1 have been revised to show: " Combination fire smoke dampers (FSD) or shunt duct* on rated shaft penetrations. FD in duct floor penetrations when no more than three floors are penetrated, and it FD on 2 hour rated wall penetrations. * shunt ducts per NFPA 90A (2002), Figure A.5.3. NFPA 90A is not an adopted document by the Town of Vail or referenced in the IMC. The review team is not familiar with the term "shunt duct". Fire smoke dampers are required at the shaft and corridor duct penetrations. (IMC 607.5.3, 607.5.4 and 607.5.5.1) Rybka Response: The 2006 IMC now calls the use of 22" upturned sheet metal ducts in 2 hour fire rated risers as 'sub ducts'. The provision of the 'sub duct' is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. The use of sub ducts on the project is shown in Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03. M2.03.1 - Remove designations for shunt ducts for the ducts run in the garage exhaust shaft. Rybka Response: EF-8, EF-43 and residential dryer exhaust have been shown terminating in a vertical areaway (garage exhaust riser) that is always being exhausted by EF-1 B on emergency power. It was agreed during the June TOV plan review meeting that this condition is analogous to the 'sub duct' provisions identified earlier. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 2. In Group B and R occupancies equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 of the International Building Code, smoke dampers are not required at penetrations of shafts where kitchen, clothes, dryer, bathroom and toilet room exhaust openings with steel exhaust subducts, having a wall thickness of at least 0.019 inch (0.48 mm) extend at least 22 inches (559 mm) vertically and the exhaust fan at the upper terminus is powered continuously in accordance with the provisions of Section 909.11 of the International Building Code, and maintains airflow upward to the outdoors. The drawings are still substantially incomplete when labeling FSD's. I will attempt to identify some locations. It will be up to the design team to identify all locations. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts exit rated shafts. All drawings are indicting F.D. on the bathroom exhausts where penetrating the shaft. There is an administrative modification request to eliminate dampers on the bathroom exhausts. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FD designations at restroom exhausts have been deleted where 'sub-ducts' are provided per the administrative modification. The drawings are indicating ducts from below and ducts from above. Please create a tag for sub-ducts and clearly mark the plans on all the ducts that are to be utilizing this system. M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-301 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 2-8x6 ducts and 1-10x6 duct. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-311 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 1-8x10 duct and 1-12x6. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-301 and C-311 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - All duct penetrations through the shafts are marked F.D. These are required to be FSD. There are too many to list individually. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts penetrate rated shafts. There are multiple places that indicate FSD's where an administrative modification has been requested to utilize a 22" sub-duct. Please coordinate. M2.04.1 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-401 and C-411 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.04.1 - There is a 14x10 duct supplying corridor C-411 missing a damper designation. The duct is near A9.9 and 11/1 1.4. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. This duct has changed size to 12x8 since last review. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) These are just a few of the un-complying damper designations, stopped review on this correction. Again, fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Reconfiguration is still necessary. 216. Ductwork, pipes and electrical are prohibited in an exit passageways unless serving the exit passageway. It appears that above non-rated ceilings in the exit passageways the space is being used as a plenum and contains construction elements not allowed, please address all exit passageways. Rybka Response: Mechanical services not associated with exit passageways have been relocated. The review team's interpretation of IBC 1020.5 is that any ductwork serving an exit passageway shall be a completely separate system from the rest of the building and separate from all other passageways. Also, this system is required for pressurization. 1020.5 Penetrations. Penetrations into and openings through an exit passageway are prohibited except for required exit doors, equipment and ductwork necessary for independent pressurization, sprinkler piping, standpipes, electrical raceway for fire department communication and electrical raceway serving the exit passageway and terminating at a steel box not exceeding 16 square inches (0.010 m2). Such penetrations shall be protected in accordance with Section 712. There shall be no penetrations or communicating openings, whether protected or not, between adjacent exit passageways. Rybka Response: It is our understanding that only portions of the building service systems that serve the exit enclosure are allowed to penetrate the exit enclosure. We note that IBC 1019.1.3, VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURE, VENTILATION, Item.2 permits HVAC equipment (FCUs) to be located in the exit enclosure: 10 19.1.3 Ventilation. Equipment and ductwork for exit enclosure ventilation shall ....where located within the building, be separated from the remainder of the building, including other mechanical equipment, with construction as required for shafts. All ductwork serving the exit passageways shall be protected at the point of penetration of the passageway with a fire/smoke damper. The passageway is an extension of the vertical exit enclosure that it serves and lesser protection is not allowed. (1017.1) Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, and have provided FSD where make-up air ductwork penetrates the exit enclosure. M2.03.1- There is a duct termination shown in Stair Q exit enclosure, labeled "16x12 Employee Dryer T/A". This is not allowed in an exit enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been revised to show routing of dryer exhaust so that it does not pass through Stair Q. M2.04.1 - There is an 8x6 duct penetration within the exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.04.1 - There is a transfer opening 24x4 within exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization; this transfer opening is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.05.3 - There is a 6" duct shown penetrating Stair N exit enclosure. Please move out of the enclosure. (IBC 1019.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.05.3 has been revised and ductwork has been rerouted so as not to pass through Stair N. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-601 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the elevator lobby and maid's room. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-601. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 3.3/4 and A11. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - There is a duct penetration between Exit Passageway C-601 and Stair S-601. Penetrations are not allowed. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-611 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-611 is not deliberate and is to be deleted. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 and a 12x6 duct passing through Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. Grid lines 11/11.4 and A8.2/A9.9. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There is a 20x10 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-611. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 133/134.3 and BC/BD. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.2 - There is a 12x10 duct penetrating the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that Stair S-605 is connected to exit passageway C-614. and that the 'unlabeled passageway' is rated 2 hours, this upper level of the hallway is rated to provide separation between levels 4 and 5 and this portion of the ceiling space does connect to a rated vertical exit enclosure, the hallway is not an exit passageway, and that 1020.5 does not apply. M2.06.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: See previous comment. M2.07.2 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. N12.07.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-717 are not intended to function as returns, are to be shown 'blanked-off and are provided for aesthetic reasons only. M2.07.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.3 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.08.1 and M2.08.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-803. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. Penetrations are not allowed fire wrapped or not. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. These comments are still outstanding. Tim Willings P.E. with Rybka met with the plans examiner on 8/14/07 to bring updated drawings addressing these corrections. It was advised to submit the drawings when all other comments are addressed. 222. Please address the garage exhaust on the east side of the structure that will cause a nuisance thru the casement windows (W 102) in rooms 5318, 6318 and 7318. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet A2.05.2 for plan location, and sheet A0.7.2 (W 102) for window type. Architect to revise window to be fixed type. HGA Response: The architectural documents have been revised to provide fixed windows at these three locations. The architectural drawings are indicating windows W 102. This window is casement not fixed on sheet A0.7.2. Please coordinate. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Revised drawings indicating fixed windows at these locations are included with this resubmittal. Since this review, the Town of Vail has informed our review team that garage exhausts on the CO2 detectors are product-conveying outlets requiring being 10' above grade, 10' from openings into the building and 10' from property lines. The continuous fan is considered environmental, thus allowing 3' from openings and 3' from property lines. Please address accordingly. 224. Please indicate how the 18" flue from the gas ironer, on the 3rd level is routed thru the loading dock above on the 4th level. Rybka Response: Laundry gas-fired flat ironer vent leaves the laundry room at level 3 (Sheet M2.03.1) and runs vertically through the building in a rated chase with fire enclosed offsets before being vented at the roof of level 11 (Sheet M2.11.1). M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Provide architectural details for the shaft. 228. Specify on the plans the location of EC-1, Type I fan for the kitchen. Rybka Response: Sheet M4.04 has been revised to show Ecology Unit EC-1 in Ecology Room M-402A. Ecology Room M-402A as designed is a component of the grease duct enclosure. "The duct enclosure shall serve a single grease exhaust duct system and shall not contain any other ducts, piping, wiring or systems." Remove the other exhaust fans, ducting and electrical within the room not associated with the Type 1 duct. (IMC 506.3.10) Rybka Response: The 2 hour rated architectural enclosure of the Ecology unit has been reconfigured to that only the ductwork and equipment associated with the commercial kitchen exhaust is contained within the Ecology Room M-402A. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour wall and 90 minute door that is shown on the mechanical drawings. 233. Indicate on the plans that the 36" dryer duct and the 18" flue from the Ironer are in a 2 hour shaft on the 6th level, page M2.06.1. Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, the 36" dryer exhaust duct and 18" gas-fired flat ironer vent that both run horizontally at level 6 (on sheet M2.06.1) are to be in a 2-hr fire rated enclosure. M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. (from comment 224) Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour shaft walls and details for construction. Please show compliance to IBC 707.11 for the bottom of the shaft housing the 34" dryer duct. 234. Provide manufacturers instructions to verify the dryers in rooms 312 and 310D are capable of exhausting the developed length shown on the plans. Rybka Response: Residential dryer exhaust system shown on Sheet M2.03.1 serving Employee Laundry Room 31 OD and Valet Room 317, with quantity five (4+1) dryer exhaust connections to dryer exhaust EF-43 has been rerouted. In addition to the lint filter integral to the appliance, and auxiliary lint trap and cleanout has been shown on the common dryer exhaust duct system before the duct leaves the Employee Laundry Room 31 OD. The entire length of the residential dryer exhaust duct is to be fire wrapped to maintain clearances to combustibles. Discharge of laundry dryer exhaust is routed to exterior via connection to rated garage exhaust riser. Penetration is protected by fire wrap and minimum 22" shunt duct extended into garage exhaust riser. In addition, RYBKA have specified a laundry exhaust booster fan EF-43 which is interlocked with dryer operation. Dryer exhaust ducts are required to terminate to the outside the building and shall be equipped with a back draft damper, also clothes dryer exhaust ducts shall not extend into or through ducts or plenums. Route the dryer ducts directly to the exterior with a back draft damper. (IMC 504.4) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by showing the backdraft damper. The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 238. The Laundry Layout, page LA 1.2, indicates a flue pipe for the dry cleaner in room #317. Add the flue and the 2 hour chase to the architectural sheets and to the mechanical sheets, clarify that it does not pass through a plenum. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.03.1 to show dry cleaning machine exhaust fan EF-8 and ducted connection to outdoors. M2.03.1 - The termination is shown with a 22" sub-duct within the garage exhaust duct. This is not to the exterior as required per IMC 502.7.3.6. The review team also is concerned that when the garage exhaust is not operating the fumes from the dry cleaning can migrate to the garage. Terminate the dry cleaning exhaust to the exterior. Rybka Response: The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 244. Add a 2 hour shaft below and proper opening protection for the duct designated as 24x14 S/A F/A-24x12 S/A TB on page M2.08.1 on grid line l0A and between 10.5/11. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1 and relocated the duct riser to the protected shaft in the North West corner of the Maids Room G-811. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by properly coordinating the duct offset/riser transfer shown at this level with rated shaft location or rating requirements. These two ducts that transition between shafts that are not aligned between the 8th and 9th floor levels are both to be shown enclosed in a 2 hour rated drywall enclosure, negating the need for combination fire smoke dampers, except where duct connections penetrate the shaft wall (one location). The duct on this level is indicating 24x14 S/A(supply air) F/A(from above). The 9th floor level or the enlarged M4.06 does not show this duct. Please clarify. 245. Add a 2 hour shaft or designate a fire damper for the 28x10 and the 28x14 as it passes through a 2 hour floor/ceiling assembly into the mechanical room above. On page M2.08.1 between grid lines 10.5 /11 and A8.2/A9.9. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that ducts that rise vertically through the building that are protected with two hour fire rated enclosures and are connected to a 2 hour rated mechanical room at the highest level do not have a fire damper at the floor penetration of the mechanical room. Rybka submits that the 2 hour rated shaft enclosure is an extension of the 2 hour rating of the mechanical room fire rated enclosure. There is a 24x10 duct shown penetrating the shaft connecting to the 28x10 duct within the shaft. Add the S/F damper at this location. (The architectural overlays indicate a shaft too small to house the duct?) There is a 24x18 duct shown in this vicinity penetrating the floor/ceiling above. Please address with a fire damper. 246. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 8x10 duct on page M2.07.2 between grid lines A8.2/A9.9 and 10110.5. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1. The duct has not been addressed on all levels also see comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by coordinating the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7, 8, 9 and 10 and attic levels (Sheets M2.07.2, M2.08.2, M2.09.2, M2.10.2 and M2.11.1). Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft wall (one location each occupied floor). The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands, the duct in question has been changed to 12x18 on the 7th level. 247. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 12x6 duct on page M2.07.1 between grid lines A6/A7 and on grid line 4.2. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1, M2.08.1, M209.1. This duct serving the elevator lobbies has not been addressed. Rybka Response: Rybka will coordinate the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7 in this location with level above and below. Rybka will correct this by rerouting existing ductwork through rated risers provided by HGA in these locations and Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft . The same issue as response to #246. The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands. The supply duct from level 11 to 10 has no shaft, the duct runs horizontally on the 9th level with no shaft and runs to the 7th level with fire dampers at the floors of the 8th and 9th. This duct requires a shaft. 264. Fire dampers and rated shafts for ductwork through floor/ceiling assemblies are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Refer to response to comment 215 Here are some floor penetrations by ducts that have not been addressed, please evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. M2.03.1 - 12x20 duct, grid lines A4.6 and 2.7/3 The duct in question has changed to 20x16. The vertical and horizontal shafts need to be shown on the architectural sheets. M2.03.1 - 18x14 duct, grid lines A12 and 3.3/4 The horizontal shaft shown on M2.02.1 is not shown on the architectural sheets. M2.04.1 - 16x10 duct, grid lines A13 and 3.3/4 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.04 - 12x6 duct, grid lines A10/A11 and 10.5111 A fire damper has been added to the 2 floors above. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. M2.04 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10/Al 1 and 10.5111 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. The duct is connecting more than 2 stories below the shaft. M2.04 - 6x12 duct, grid lines A10 and 10.5 The drawings have been changed to add fire dampers at the floor line. This duct connects more than 2 stories, a shaft is required. M2.05 - 26x14 R/A, grid lines A6/A7 and 5 A fire damper is required at the floor between the 5th and 6th level. M2.05 - 12x12 paint shop exhaust, 12x12 carpenter exhaust and a 24x12 sanitary duct, grid lines A4.6 and 4/5. These ducts traverse from what appears to be a rated shaft from below through the Resid. Club Concierge Desk (512) room up through the ceiling with no protection. This duct enters a shaft on this level, add a fire damper to the duct as it enters the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.05 - 6x6, 8x6, (2)12x6 and 10x20 ducts, grid lines A10 and 10/10.5 M2.05 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10 and 10.5111 Review on duct penetrations through the floors has been stopped. The plans examiner's function is not to make a punch list for the design team. Evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that fire dampers, rated shafts and combination fire smoke dampers have been added to the floor plans in general conformance with requirements of the plan reviewer. Additional damper, combination fir dampers and shaft wall construction will be required where this drawing revision has not correctly identified that they are required. Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. Structural Conditions- The conditions listed are taken from the last comment letter dated 07/18/2007. The open issues are listed in Red. S106 F 9,11,14/S6.01 E Sheet S2.03.2: 12 ft. cantilever retaining wall extension of exterior two span wall below, outside of ballroom areaway on line Al l between 14 and 14.5 has not been checked and appears to be overstressed for flexure, please check. Consider moment resisting joints at slab to wall connections. Design / detail planter wall. These details require rebar and splices to be shown for proper detailing and construction. Verify cantilever deflection. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S110 F S2.02.4 No calculations have been provided for the cantilevered retaining wall around the pool structure, or on gridline D1. Verify lateral load capacity, consider pedestrian surcharge and water surcharge due to site drains behind this wall as appropriate. Verify footing width. KL&A 6/26/07: Wall in question between gridlines 6-8.5 south of A18 supports roof loads and also is the lateral load path for pool structure loading, and for roof uplift for partially enclosed structures. Wall also is monolithic with Area 3A perimeter building wall. Design is part of EOR's scope, please provide wall designs accounting for support of roof structure. KL&A 8/31/07: Coordinate new retaining wall detail 21/S4.03 with foundations shown on plan, S2.02.4. Verify new steel roof around pool structure will resist lateral soil reaction of 1.0 klf, verify metal deck shear strength and connection to resisting perpendicular retaining walls. S128 GS S2.09.3 Top slab bars IOT3 & IOT6 are shown at line 10.6/A14. It seems these bars are shown in error as the concrete beam is upturned at this location. Beams south of line A 12.2 are not identified. Please check. IBC 1603.1. KL&A 6/26/07: Top bars also appear required at gridline A10. S2.09.3 PT profile is incomplete, details are required. KL&A 8/31/07: Top bars are still not shown on plan, please review. S145 LS 1/S3.02C Wall thickness is shown as 8 inches. Plan S201.2 indicates a 12" exterior foundation wall, please coordinate. KL&A 6/26/07: Coordinate reinforcing shown on shear wall elevation with 'W2' or'W3' per S2.01.2, it is unclear which wall type controls for soil lateral loading. Wall must span two way due to stair shaft opening, verify designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S164 LS S2.11 Provide detail of roof diaphragm to concrete cores. Provide or indicate detail of steel beams to concrete cores for gravity plus lateral loading, per ASCE 7-02 load combinations. Verify drag loads and chord force detailing at eave framing. Verify diaphragm welding is sufficient for expected shear forces, provide shear and moment diagram at roof deck levels. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7. KL&A 6/26/07: New detail 13/S 1.0.513: Welded studs, thickness and dimensions of embed plate are not defined. Please provide this information for all beams and reaction conditions on the drawings. Verify connection is adequate with short slot or long slot holes in the shear tab, if permitted for erection. Provide roof diaphragm calculations per original comment. IBC 1911, 1912, 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S165 LS S2.11 Provide detail of concrete diaphragm to concrete cores, verify shear transfer at each level and comment whether any drags are required. Verify if typical details 12 & 23/S1.0.3A apply throughout the job. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S169 LS S3.02A Calculations show a significant force reversal / back-stay effect from Level 6 to Level 5 shear force, i.e. SW 14 & SW 16. Verify this load path has been designed for the loads per 3D analysis. Verify soil plus wind / seismic loading has been used for drag design. Note per plan, S2.05.1, a large hole exists adjacent to wall SW16, and per calculations page 536, (38+57)=95k shear transfer is required. No drags are shown on plan. Please verify. Note, elevations S3.02A show #5 @ 14" o.c. at upper levels, calculations shown (2) #5 @ 24" o.c., please verify designs match calculations. IBC 1616.1.1, IBC 1604.4. KL&A 6/26/07: Original comment calculated (38+57)=95k load for SW14 not SW16 as noted, however collector bars have not been added for SW 14. SW 16 collector load is (86+143)=229k, (4) #7 shown on plan are not adequate for 229k, please review all collector designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S171 S2.11.1-2, etc. Roof framing plans are incomplete. Please address the following and confirm detailing will be provided in future drawings issues, per IBC 1604.2, 2205.1. a) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed b) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed c) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed d) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed e) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed f) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed g) W8 & W16 eave supports do not cantilever outwards and support eave in RAM analysis submitted, instead all load is transferred directly to columns via eave rim beam. Verify eave supports and perimeter girders are adequately sized KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. h) S2.09.3, etc: HSS6x6 to W8, W14 moment connection at eave needs a detail KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. i) I /S2.10.3: W1601 on line A10.5 is shown as W 18x35 per calculations, please verify all beams match calculations. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S172 I /S2.08.3 W 18x46 eave support girder near gridlines CB-C 1 is shown as W21 x44 per calculations; W1400 on line BE is shown as W21x48 per calculations. Several cantilevered eave moment connection supports are shown without a backspan member. Please review. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 I /S2.08.3 Verify lateral support of the low roof structure for wind and seismic loading; low roof section is not connected to Level 8 PT slab beyond or core walls within the roof area, and braced frames are not shown. Similar at 2/S2.08.3 and other low roof structures. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 11,26,28/S7.01 A Calculations indicate that roof deck is attached to slab edge along line 2 and other locations where deck and floor slab are near the same elevation. Provide a detail for lateral roof to slab connection where required by lateral analysis. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. 5174 52.11.1, etc Show roof diaphragm to concrete core connection, consider in-plane collector shear forces and out of plane anchorage forces. IBC 1604.8.2; ASCE 7, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S175 52.11.1 Verify diaphragm continuity at dormers line A5 between upper roof deck and lower roof deck, provide collectors as required for in plane shear and out of plane shear. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S176 S2.09.2 Roof ridge support columns nearl 5.5-A4.8 shown on S2.11.2 are not supported by slab below, please check. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Column in question is 20 feet tall, verify HSS5x5 is adequate, per S2.11.2. S178 A2.11.1 R, etc. Structural roof plans do not incorporate snow fences shown on architectural drawings. Please provide snow fence with adequate structural connection shear and moment associated with sliding snow. IBC 1608. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. KL&A 8/31/07: COMMENTS ON NEW DETAILS FOLLOW S187 21/S4.03 Minimum depth shall be 48" for frost depth requirement. IBC 1805.2.1. Verify wall vertical rebar is adequately developed at top of footing, ACI 318, 12.2. Appears that variables D and D' are reversed with calculations variables hf and hp, please review. IBC 1806. S188 S5.03 Revised beams 4138 & 4139 appear too shallow to support one way slab at ramp. Shear ties are spaced greater than d/2. Please review beam sizes for ramp loads. IBC 1604.2. Planning Department Conditions- From: Warren Cambell Submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval prior to requesting a TCO. Public Works Conditions- From: Chad Salli, Project Engineer 1. Install snowmelt in loading dock dwy. Sheet M5.15 not in resubmittal package, Sheet M5.14 shows heat in the southern half of the dwy. The dwy should be heated from the back of pan along the Frontage Rd to the trench drain. 2. The fountain entry feature shall not be public right-of-way, please remove from right-of-way. 3. The two tier retaining wall shall be designed/stamped by a Colorado registered professional engineer, greater than 4' in height from the top of wall to the bottom of the foundation. 4. Provide Final Drainage report including hydrology and hydraulic analyses (Box culvert, Storm pipe, inlets, swales, etc...). This shall include storm sewer profiles with HGL shown. A 100 yr analysis shall be completed showing no private/public property damage as a result. Provide capacity analysis for major swales and all inlets. The SCS method may be used for large mountain basins, the Rational method shall be used for the smaller site and developed basins. 5. A Developer Improvement Agreement will be required prior to release of permit. 6. Show proposed location for Comcast fiber line along the west property line. Frontage Road/Vail Road 1. Town of Vail Street lights shall be placed at 50' spacings along the project limits. Coordinate with TOV electricians for electric meter location. Relocate private lighting to private property. 2. Set back (detach) the frontage rd sidewalk 6' from back of curb east of the porte cochere exit. Sod shall be installed between the curb and walk. 3. Use attached sidewalk detail for sidewalks located within the right-of-way. 4. Use TY 13 curb inlets vs TY R where the sidewalk is attached to the curb. 5. If necessary, raise Spraddle Creek vault #1 manhole to finished grade. 6. The cross-walk at the roundabout shall be asphalt thru the travel lanes and concrete only across the median. 7. Use CDOT TY 3A curb ramps at the roundabout, 6' width at the throat. 8. Storm line A shall be at I% minimum slope. Leaving the existing proposed invert elev at TY R inlet 3 and working upstream at I% appears to still allow for a min of 2' cover at the existing inlet on the north side of the frontage road. 9. Sheet E1.00, please turn off extra curb&gutter alignment. 10. Install 24" conduits to medians for irrigation and 34" conduits to the west median for future use. Spraddle Creek Drainage 1. Per previous agreement with the Town, Four-Seasons is responsible for the construction cost of continuing Spraddle Creek to STA 4+40. 2. Install an impermeable membrane around the RCP/CBC due to proposed landscaping and irrigation. 3. Please provide additional detail of proposed walls along the RCP/CBC alignment. Construction of these walls shall be designed so as not to disturb/undermine the RCP/CBC. W Meadow Drive 1. Final approval of the West Meadow Drive construction drawings will be completed in conjunction with the Town of Vail design. Modifications to tie-in grades on the Four Seasons site may be necessary to accommodate this final design. W Meadow plans shall also develop streetscape related items in the right-of-way (street lighting, landscaping, etc). 2. Storm line G alignment needs to be revised. There is not enough room to install between Spraddle Creek and a large tree on the south side of W Meadow that shall be protected. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. 3. Storm line E appears to in conflict with the recently installed water line. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. Landscaping/Irrigation 1. Detailed landscaping comments to follow within the next couple of weeks. 2. Coordinate irrigation with TOV irrigation supervisor for final head type/location and water source. 3. The Town is currently in talks with CDOT on permissible landscaping within CDOT right-of-way. Fire Department Conditions- 1. LSR, MOU's and Administrative Modifications must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protection Engineer of record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not accepted. RJA allegedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence has not been presented. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans is not accepted. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additional review. Cond: CON0010349 Sub-duct system for the dryers and range hoods is not approved. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R090000756 Amount: $600.00 06/26/200912:44 PM Payment Method: Check Init: SAB Notation: 62786-HYDER Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 166,372.90 This Payment: $600.00 Total ALL Pmts: 166,372.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300, PLAN CK - project GFP012 600.00 Itnc SAR bwJune 18, 2009 Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 COLORADO Building Department Services Description: Bulletins 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 68, 69, 72, 73 RE: PROJECT: 4 Seasons PERMIT NUMBER: B06-0196 REVISION NUMBER: 27 INTERNAL REF 9840 ADDRESS: 1 Vail Road Dear Mr. Haeberle: SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed the documents to review in accordance with the International Codes as adopted by the Town of Vail. Listed below are approved for issuance. Bulletin 59 - Corrections/Responses received and approved. Town Planning Department approval required for deck size increases. This can be found on sheet A2.10.1. Bulletin 61 - These mechanical drawings were approved and collated in previous revisions. Bulletin 62 - Landscape and sprinkler revisions to be approved by Public Works prior to issuance. Bulletin 63 - Ok to issue Bulletin 64 - Minor Storm Drain re-routing. 8%2x1 1's to be incorporated into full sized drawings. A two hour ceiling is to be installed in the exit passageways to isolate the plumbing from the passageways. Discussed in meetings, drawings for the ceilings are approved during Revision 28 review. Bulletin 68 - Ok to issue, piping in the passageways to be above the 2 hour lid. Ceiling details approved during Revision 28 approval. Bulletin 69 - Minor door changes. 8%2x1 1's incorporated into full sized drawings. Bulletin 72 - Landscape and sprinkler revisions to be approved by Public Works prior to issuance. Bulletin 73 - 8'/2x1 1's incorporated into full sized drawings. Plan review fee: $600.00 N dditional square footage- No added valuation Since 1 arlie Davis Building Official SAFEbuilt Colorado charlie.davis(a%SAFEbuilt.coin Page 1 of I SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov_B06- 0196 Rev27 IR9840 FAL final.docx RAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LLC 86 Chambers Street, Suite 704 Telephone: 347-861-4433 New York, New York 10007 Facsimile: 1-800-308-5947 Mr. Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: Permit No. B06-0196 Four Seasons Vail, CO Dear Martin, June 11, 2009 Please be advised that as of June 11, 2009, the general contracting services for the referenced project provided by Layton Construction Company have been terminated. Hyder Construction Inc. has been contracted to continue forward with the project. In order to prevent any unnecessary interruption to construction activities, we hereby request that the referenced construction permit be transferred from Layton Construction to Hyder Construction Inc. as of the date of this request. Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated, If you have any questions on the above, please feel free to contact me at mrossi(R1ralcompanies.com or 347-861- 4433. Very Truly Yours Michael M. Rossi, PE, LEED AP Authorized Project Representative cc: David Proctor Doug Thompson JUN 112009 TOWN OF VAIL TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No...: 210107101016 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR LAYTON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC 9090 S. SANDY PARKWAY SANDY UTAH 84040 License: 333-A APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS 600 FOSHAY TOWER 821 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 License: C000001981 Permit # B06-0196 Project PRJ03-0468 Status ISSUED Applied..: 07/18/2006 Issued . 06/03/2009 Expires . 09/26/2007 07/19/2006 07/19/2006 Phone: (801) 568-9090 07/19/2006 Phone: 612-332-1500 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Occupancy Type NIGHT CLUBS (A2) ZONE 4 IB CHURCHES (A3) ZONE 4 IB BUSINESS(B)& HMP (H5 ZONE 4 IB EDUCATIONAL (E) ZONE 4 IB INDUSTRIAL/MOD HAZ ( ZONE 4 IB MERCANTILE (M) ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/HOTELS ( ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/MULTFAM( ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/MOD HAZ (Sl) ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/LOW HAZ(S2) ZONE 4 IB Totals... Factor Sq Feet Valuation 299.08 27,353 $8,180,735.24 369.90 8,605 $3,182,989.50 300.40 31,130 $9,351,452.00 322.53 670 $216,095.10 183.77 29,600 $5,439,592.00 220.56 2,445 $539,269.20 302.22 86,991$26,290,420.02 250.22 133,695$33,453,162.90 169.75 23,080 $3,917,830.00 167.15 75,773$12,665,456.95 399,510$103,237,002.9* TOV Adjusted Valuation: 3,237,002.91 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $237,002.91 •**sa*+***s*e**********+*►*rs•is***a****+*****r»*rs********s*** FEE SUMMARY Building > 378, 777.45 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees 157, 177 . 90 Plan Check 378, 777.45 Recreation Fee--------------> 399, 510.00 Additional Fees-----------> $8,595.00 Investigation-> $0.00 TOTAL FEES > 157, 177.90 Total Permit Fee---------- > 165, 772.90 Will Call-----> $3 . 00 Payments > 165, 772.90 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0 .00 Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e-mailed to applicant. 12/18/2006 cdavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set for plan c stamped by TOV 12/13/06. An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer. 03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR:1215- G&E permit approval only. Conditi( apply. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only 06/12/2007 CDAVIS Action: PA Tower Crane footing pads. No additional fees assessed 07/16/2007 jplano Action: CR Additional work being requested to be addec phasing, correction letter sent. 08/01/2007 jplano Action: CR Second correction letter sent, insuffient information supplied. 3) The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested added to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design professioi architect and/or engineer. The design professionals are to verify that the additi( work being requested is not in conflict with the corrections that are requested regard: full building permit. Ali sheets are to be stamped and signed by the associated design professional. The architectural and the plumbing sheets have not been stamped. The stamp on the stri sheets has not been signed. The stamp on the electrical sheets has not been signe( 4 There is insufficient detail to approve this submittal. Some examples are: a) There are several sections that are pertinent to this request that are not pro' b) The elevator pit sections 10/S4.04, 18/S4.04, 19/S4.04, 20/S4.04 are missing. c) Ramp transition section 22/S6.01, 6/S6.01, 7/S4.04 are missing d) Exterior foundation wall connection to the matt slab 9/S6.01D, 27/S6.01, 61S.0: 7/S6.01 e) Sump pit details 28/S4.04 and 29/S4.04 f) Column schedule, transition of the columns to slab? g) Slab steps 11/S6.01D. This review has stopped because of lack of information. 5 The Public Works Department in Vail has not approved the submittal for additionz to be added to the phasing. Their approval will be necessary. 08/06/2007 jplano Action: PA Additional work approved for phasing. Under plumbing, underground electrical, rebar and concrete placement for elevator and si pits. NO APPROVAL FOR MAT SLAB 09/11/2007 jplano Action: AP 10/22/2007 DPLACE Action: PA only. No charge. 10/22/2007 dplace Action: PA CHARGE. 11/13/2007 ependley Action: AP stamps. No added valuation. 11/15/2007 ependley Action: AP valuation. Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 11/30/2007 jplano Action: AP valuation. Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 12/18/2007 JPLANO Action: AP tension slabs, no added valuation 12/26/2007 jplano Action: AP cable for 016 hours 023A, with thickened slab. $120.00 due 12/27/2007 MROYER Action: AP Full permit approved, see conditions REV 4 IR 5881: Approved shop drawings for REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONA] REV5/IR6042. Approved shop drawings for de: Rev7/IR6058. Approved RFI-0237, No added Rev6/IR6057. Approved RFI-0221, No added Rev9/IR6236. Approved shop drawings for po., Rev10/IR6252. Approved changing a post ten: Revll/IR6266,6267. Rebar shop drawings rev: appropiate stamps, no charge 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA REV 12 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER LAYTON ST #05510-004 (EMBEDS @ LEVEL 1, 2, 3 ns 4) FROM JT STEEL NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA EV.13 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER SUBMITTAL (STUD RAILS, LEVELS 4 & 5) FROM SUNCOAST NO ADDTIONAL CHARGE 06/10/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev14,15,16, IR6685,6687,7744 are approved of plan review due, $720.00 07/08/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 19, IR 7989 are approved, Bulletins 10,25,29,31,35,40 - 8 hours of plan review due, $480.00 08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev17, IR 7777 are approved, Bulletins 023 swimming pool revisions, $360 due 08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 20, IR8245 are approved, storm and sewE connetions outside the building, public works has approved it. No charge from SafE 09/29/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev18, IR7988 are approved. The sub-duct s-,\ for the dryers and range hoods are not approved. 46 hours of plan review due = $2760.( 12/04/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev22/IR9384 - This is the revised ADMOD f( exterior wood above 401. This is to be approved by the fire department to be issued. No chi from SB 12/18/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev23/IR9488, Additional fire-stopping subr approved, no charge 01/02/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev21/IR9008, Approved Bulletins 036, 037, 040, 043, 044, 050, 051, 052, 055, 056 and firestopping submittal. 055, generator fueling needs fire department approval prior to issuance 056, deck extention needs DRB approval prior to issuance 29 hours of plan review due=$1740.00 02/09/2009 jplano Action: NA Rev24/IR9666 - Fire Alarm Plans to be appr< the fire department 02/09/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev25/IR9587 - "3M Fire Resistive Wrap 15A' approved for HVAC ducting as shown on apporved plans. 2 hours of plan review Due=$120.00 02/10/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev26/IR9663 - Subduct system for resident: dryer system approved. 8 hours of plan review due=$480.00 04/16/2009 jplano Action: CR Rev27, IR9840 - Bulletins 59-73, correction sent, revisions needed and full sized drawings for collation 04/23/2009 jplano Action: CR Rev28, IR9926 - Submittal to be stamped an( by FPE. This is the exit passageway conditions. 05/28/2009 ependley Action: AP Rev28/IR9926 approved. No added valuation. plan review at $240.00 Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the He Cross Utility relocation permit request. The applicant shall remove only those trees wh: absolutely necessary for the utility relocation work. 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the application to dewater the site. 03/31/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning recieved a bond to cover the Grad: Excavation in the amount of 3.2 million. Planning has approved the grading and ex( permit. 06/25/2007 Warren Action: COND Planning has approved the full building pei dated recieved on May 29, 2007, with a single condition. A complete Design Review aplication will need to be submitted for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive. 08/20/2007 Warren Action: AP The set of plans provided to allow fro the of some work prior to release of a full building permit has been approved. The plans date stamped July 26, 2007 09/05/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning is approving the set of plans dat( August 3, 2007, with the condition that the applicant submits a revised landscaping plan foi and approval prior to requesting a TCO. 11/02/2007 GRUTHER Action: AP CHARGE. REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAI 06/12/2008 Warren Action: AP The planning departmetn signs off on Bullei and 23A with one condition. The gate on teh new set of stairs shal be as the base of t stairs on the pool deck not on the top of the stairs adjacent to Meadow Drive. I Four 09/26/2008 Warren Action: CR Regarding the above permit my only comment need a detail of the gate at the top of the stairs serving as an exit trom the poc This detail shall be depict the desired gate which tits not only the aesthetics of Season but that of the Meadow Drive streetscape. The design should take into accoi need for security from the public side of the tence and be design with this in mind. Fc example the Town does not want to see a nice gate submitted, approved, and installed and t because of security reason we add a piece of plexi-glass to the gate as an atterthought. plans are dated 5-8-08 Bullentin #40. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received 04/17/06. Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding. Review: on south the of work Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied: 1. Fire Dept staging on south side of project is shown on east end. The apporved the west end. The hydrant on the west end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on side. Sheet A0.3.00 2. Sheet A0.3.05 does not show an acceptable route to the interior of the buiidinc Fire Command Center. 3. The plans submitted by RJA are not stamped and are labeled "Not for Constructic 4. The plans show a dead end corridor behind the front desk. 5. 12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is gi Relocate electrical disconnect to the trailer or provide ready access on southwest site. Location as proposed on plan submitted 12/13/06 is not accepted. 03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: PA g and e permit is approved 03/29/2007 cdavis 07/11/2007 McGee as submitted 7 11 07. 09/07/2007 McGee Action: AP For G & E only Action: AP Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3A approved for l: Action: AP The full permit is approved as noted: Life Safety Report 5 22 07 1. LSR, MOU's, and Admin Mod's must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protect: Engineer of Record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not accepted. RJA alledgedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence ha: been presented. 3. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans, is not accepted. 5. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additionE review. 12/08/2008 MAH Action: AP Rev21/IR9008 - This is the revised ADMOD fc exterior wood above 401. This is to be approved by the fire department to be issued. No chz from SB. PER VERBAL FROM MIKE VAUGHAN, OK TO APPROVE FOR FIRE. 02/25/2009 drhoades Action: AP Permanent location of FDC for South side of building. 03/26/2009 mcgee Action: AP Sub duct revisions 1 27 09 per RJA 1. Add clean out of lint traps to OEM manual for project. Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 10/20/2006 is Action: DN Awaiting for additional information 12/20/2006 is Action: PA Approval to allow grading and prep work foi installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for t site access for small construction vehicles ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive. 03/26/2007 is Action: PA Staging plan for Phase 1 of the G&E permit approved only. Engineer approval for the G&E permit still required currently under review. staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only 08/07/2007 csalli Action: AP additional work proposed for phased permit approved, no approval for mat slab 09/13/2007 csalli Action: DN waiting for executed MOU 10/04/2007 TK Action: AP Approved Building Permit with the condtion., in the memo dated 8/5/07 from Chad Salli. 07/31/2008 csalli Action: AP revised sheets C17, C20 dated 7/18/08 and C18, C18A, C19 dated 7/1/08 approved Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS Item: 05700 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN A}~ANCE/Y TELEPHONE AT 47 -2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit # B06-0196 as of 06-03-2009 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS J. BRINK 612-332-1500 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: I VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Conditions: Cond: CON0008815 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3/28/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 Applied: 07/18/2006 Issued: 06/03/2009 To Expire: 09/26/2007 The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the full building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original comment number for clarity. General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule" to prevent a room that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor". The Fire and Life Safety Report prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants. These will be required for full permit issuance. General: The Fire & Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved prior to the approval for full building permit. 3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units 3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is discharging. 8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C-414, is actually a horizontal portion of Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or remove the designation of passageway. 10) See the general comment above. 11) See the general comment above. 12) See the general comment above. 13) See the general comment above. 16) See the general comment above. 22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be tested in accordance with ASTME 119, tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire-resistance rating not less than the fire-resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the window when responding for full building permit. 23) See the general comment above. 39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures. Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly. This item has no impact on the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building permit issuance. 42) See response the comment number 39. 46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space is not accessory. 46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 210A as there is no access to stair Q. Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel. 49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved by the Town of Vail's Building Official. 57 through 61 and 149) The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 14 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 17 (BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FRf INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED Cond: 35 (P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: 5 (PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEME LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPR SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC. Cond: CON0009095 The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review aplication for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs added from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive, within 30 days of the release of the building permit. Cond: CON0009121 The applicant shall submit a seperate Design Review application for review and approval for all signage design, locations, and materials prior to installation. Cond: CON0009294 The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan which addresses the landscaping conflicts created by the shallow soild depths on the culvert containing Spraddle Creek. This plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to requesting a certifcate of occupancy. Cond: CON0009330 SAFEbuilt Colorado Conditions of Approval To: Layton Construction Re: Full Building Permit Conditions of Approval The following conditions will be required to be addressed prior to construction. Sufficient time shall be granted for review, response and approval before work is initiated. Building Department- The items listed within the building department comments are numbered to correspond with the 3 round comment letter dated 08/21/2007. 46. Change the exiting from Vestibule 210A. It appears to exit through intervening room that is not accessory to the vestibule. HGA Response: We submit that the adjacent space is accessory. Vestibule 210A services mechanical rooms and the service elevators. To exit from Vestibule 210A the occupants have to pass through Vestibule 275A, which is basically for the spa staff, then through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area, then to hallway 279, then through exit passageway 293, then through exit passageway 297, then to exit discharge. The issue is that the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area is not accessory to the mechanical rooms. It is accessory for the rooms off Vestibule 275A for the staff of the spa but not the mechanical areas. Please change the layout accordingly. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Vestibule 210A is purely circulation space and does not carry an occupant load. This vestibule provides connection between the Spa and the service elevators, IDF Room 210, and Mechanical Room 257. Relative to egress, it provides the egress route for the one occupant from IDF 210 and the one occupant from Mechanical 257 (as shown on A0.3.02). IDF 210, Mechanical 257, Vestibule 210A, and Service Elevator Lobby E-202 are considered to be part of the overall Spa as they serve Spa functions. The service elevators stop at this location solely to provide connection to the Spa. IDF 210 houses audio-visual, telephone, and data system equipment that specifically serves the Spa and must be accessed by Spa personnel. Similarly, Mechanical 257 houses the equipment serving the pools within Room 255 and must be accessed by Spa staff. In summary, we submit that all these spaces are part of the overall Spa and are "accessory" to each other. Therefore, current layout provides egress that complies with IBC 1013.2 as the spaces are accessory, are not hazard occupancies, and provide a discernible path of travel to an exit. This comment is in reference to the electrical room #212. Please revise 64. A2.03.1 - Wall tag both shafts located in room 304 (storage room). Wall tags must reference an approved assembly from the partition schedule. HGA Response: Wall tag has been added. One shaft in room 304 does not have wall tags. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The drawing has been updated to include wall tags for this shaft. Still have one shaft not tagged Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. 152. Provide accessible parking spaces per IBC Table 1106.1. Providing 212 spaces would require 7 to be accessible, 2 of those to be van accessible. Verify 98" of vertical clearance for the van spots. HGA Response: We submit that the number of accessible parking stalls complies with IBC Table 1106.1 and section 1106.5. The hotel is operating on 100% valet parking stalls, with an additional 59 self-park stalls for fractional ownership, full ownership, and employee. Per Table 1106.1, 3 stalls are required for the self-parking, and at least one of the three is required to be van accessible. Plan sheet A0.3.01 indicates there are 228 parking spaces. Spaces marked for Valet parking number 78. With those counts, Table 1106.1.3 would require 5 accessible spaces with one van accessible space. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Per previous response, most of the parking spaces are valet only. There are 59 self-park stalls that will be allocated to fractional ownership, full ownership condos, and employees. The drawings have been updated to identify each space as either valet or self-park. We submit that only the 59 self-park stalls are considered per Table 1106.1 and that the number of accessible spaces required are provided. Deducting the 78 Valet parking from the total spaces, you are still required to add two additional accessible spaces for a total number of 5 accessible spaces. 155. All the massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. Please amend the toilet facilities, changing rooms, lavatories, tubs and the showers meet to accessibility requirements of the ANSI A117.1-98. (IBC 1109.14.3) HGA Response: We submit the Wet Massage Suite #289 complies with the accessibility requirements of ANSI A117.1-98 (IBC 1109.14.3). All massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We disagree that IBC 1109.14.3 requires that ALL spa treatment rooms be accessible. IBC 1109.14 pertains to "recreational facilities". If the Spa is going to be considered a "recreational facility" then it should be considered as a whole. As such, the Spa is accessible - it provides accessibility at the entry/reception, locker rooms, toilets, showers, whirlpools, lounges, treatment rooms, etc. We submit that nothing requires ALL treatment rooms to be accessible any more than ALL lockers, ALL toilets, or ALL showers. Add grab bars at the tub in room 289 for accessibility. 167. We are unable to locate a designated accessible Type "A" condominium per Section 1107.6.2 of the 2003 IBC. As the condominiums are a different type of R-2 occupancy from the time-share units, an accessible Type "A" condominium is required. HGA Response: Since only 16 condominiums are proposed, no Type "A" units are required. Refer to IBC 1107.6.2.1.1. With the condominiums, employee housing and timeshare units there are a total of 63 units classified as an R-2 occupancy group. Per Section 1107.6.2.1.1 Type A units shall be dispersed among the various classes of units. Therefore a Type A accessible unit is required in each of the following groups: the condominiums, the employee housing, and the timeshare units. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): To resolve this issue we have revised Condo #8 (on Level 9, sheet A4.28.1)) to be a "Type A" unit per ICC/ANSI A117.1. Two accessible employee housing units and one accessible timeshare unit are already provided and indicated on the drawings. Comment 169-180 - Submit a Memorandum of Understanding to the Town of Vail for approval by the Building Official to reference the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1. If accepted by the town, please revise entire plan to comply with the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1 in its entirety. If not accepted please revise plans per 1998 ANSI A-117.1 and comments above. 169. In the accessible units in the guest rooms of the R-1 occupancy, all bathing & toilet facilities are required to be accessible per Chapter 6 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: We submit that the accessible units include the accessible bathing and toilet facilities and comply with Chapter 6 of ANSI A117. 1. Plan sheet A4.07.1 A and A4.07.1 B for Unit PR-HC shows a raised platform in media room # 116 which does not have an accessible route. Also, bathrooms/rooms # 103, # 108, # 109, # 110, # 133 do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The raised platform within Media 116 is intended to provide tiered seating within this "home theater". We submit that an accessible route is not required for this small platform as it is less than 25% of the overall room and the remainder of the room is accessible. While this room is not an "assembly" space, we submit that IBC 1108.2.4. 1, exception 2 provides guidance regarding this room. See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.06.1 for Unit 2KK-HC has bathrooms/rooms #103, #108 which do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.05.3 for Unit 1 K-HC has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.04AA for Unit ES2-HC has bathroom # 103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.01.1 for Unit K1-H1 has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Unit type KI-HI is a unit for the hearing impaired. It is not an accessible unit. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We submit that only one accessible bathroom is required within an accessible hotel unit. This requirement is consistent with the federal standard - ADAAG Chapter 9. To interpret IBC Chapter 1 I as requiring that ALL bathrooms must be accessible is to raise the standard beyond the federal requirements. We submit that this is not reasonable, does not reflect industry standard, and is not the intent of the IBC / ICC. Rather, we submit that the IBC / ICC intends to coordinate and correlate with the federal standards. As an example, we can examine the accessibility requirements for condominiums. The federal standard is the FHA Fair Housing Design Manual. This document allows condo units to be provided with one "Specification B" bathroom and that is the highest level of accessibility. Similarly, the 2003 edition of ICC / ANSI A117.1 has been revised to better correlate to FHA and require that "Type A" units provide "at least one" accessible bathroom . The common thread is the requirement is for one or "at least one" accessible bathroom - not all. Since the ADAAG, FHA Design Manual, and A117 (2003) all require one or "at least one" accessible bathroom it is reasonable to interpret the IBC's requirements in the same manner. Otherwise, all the hotel units would be held to a higher standard than the condominium units within the same building. 170. In Type "A" dwelling units of the R-2 occupancies, all toilet and bathing facilities must comply with Sections 1002.11.1 through 1002.11.7 of ANSI A 117.1. Some Type "A" dwelling units have bathrooms which do not comply. Please clarify. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We request that ICC/ANSI A117.1 - 2003 be used as the applicable edition relative to the "Type A" condominium. This is the most recent version of Al 17 and our research has found that the various revisions in Chapter 10 were intended to correct the intent of various provisions and to better coordinate with federal requirements (FHA and ADA). Per 1003.11.1 of the A117-2003, at least one bathroom is required to comply with 1003.11. This correlates with FHA requirements ("Specification B" bathrooms) and Chapter 9 of the ADA. Therefore, we submit that the latest intent of the various codes and standards is that at least one bathroom, but not all, is required to comply with 1003.11. 171. In Type "A" dwelling units, a permanent seat is required at the head end of the bathtub per Section 607 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): ICC/ANSI A117.1 - 1998, 607.3 states that a permanent seat OR a removable in-tub seat shall be provided. However, 1002.11.6, exception 1, states that the removable in-tub seat required by 607.3 is NOT required. Since 607.3 gives the option of either permanent or removable seats, we submit that the true intent of 1002.11.6, exception 1 is to NOT require either type of seat. ICC / ANSI A 117.1 - 2003 carries similar language, but also includes Figure 1003.11.8 (a) to clarify that the seat (permanent or removable) can be omitted. 172. In Type "A" dwelling units, clearance in front of bathtubs shall extend the length of the bathtub and shall be 30 inches wide minimum per Section 607 of ANSI Al 17.1. Some of the bathtubs have lavatories encroaching into the required clearances. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required bathtub clear floor area is indicated. 173. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.11.1 of ANSI A 117. 1, doors shall not swing into the clear floor or ground space or clearance for any fixture, unless a clear floor space of 30 inches minimum by 48 inches minimum is located beyond the arc of the door swing. There are water closet compartments and some other bathroom areas that do not meet those requirements. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. The door swings do not swing into the other clear floor spaces. 174. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.13 of ANSI A] 17. 1, where operable windows are provided, at least one window in each sleeping, living, or dining space shall have operable parts complying with Section 1002.13 of ANSI Al 17.1. All windows of "accessible units" shall comply with Section 309 of ANSI A117.1, Operable Parts. Provide documentation showing compliance. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. A note has been added to indicate requirement that all operable windows (and sliding doors) comply with 1002.13. 175. For Type "A" and "accessible units", provide details showing accessibility compliance for the operable parts of the showers, lavatory height, lavatory knee and toe clearance, and bathroom mirror height per Section 1002.11 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to interior elevations shown within the Interior Design drawings. I am unable to locate the Interior Design Drawings in the plan set submitted. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to accessibility details illustrated on sheet A0.4.3. 180. For Type "A" dwelling units, provide details showing accessibility compliance for kitchen work surfaces, sinks, range controls, and refrigerator/freezer requirements per Section 1002.12 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment 4 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required kitchen features are illustrated. 183. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the condominiums, some "U" shaped kitchens do not have the required 60 inch minimum clearance between opposing base cabinets per Section 1003.12 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Sheets A4.22.1, A4.25.1, and A4.30.1 have been revised to provide 60" clearance at U-shaped kitchens. Provide corrected plan sheets. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These sheets are included in the 7/18/07 resubmittal set. 185. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the time share units, the water closets do not have required clearances and some doors encroach required clearances per Section 1003.11.2 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to the response to comment # 186 below. As such, there are no Type "B" timeshare units. See response to comment # 186. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to response to comment # 186. 186. Is Option "A" being used for the bathroom fixtures in the Type "B", Time-share units? If so, each fixture is required to meet the requirements of the option per Section 1003.11.3.1 of ANSI A117.1. Please clarify. HGA Response: As previously discussed and resolved, the timeshare units are transient occupancy (similar to hotel units) and not residences. As such, one accessible timeshare unit is provided per IBC Table 1107.6.1.1. This accessible unit is #3103 located on Level 03. The enlarged plan for this accessible unit is on sheet A4.12.IA and the associated H/C bathroom in 2/A4.12.2A. Provide signed letters from persons representing the operating authority for this facility stating that the timeshare units will not be used as residences. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These letters will be submitted by ownership 203. Enclose both mechanical rooms on the 9th level in 2 hour rated construction, it appears that the 2 hour shafts from below terminate in these rooms. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet M4.06 (Part Plan Attachment No. M06). The Area 3A mechanical room is unrated, and the 2 hour rated vertical risers through the building through the 8th floor slab. In order to avoid the installation of inaccessible fire dampers at the top of the riser, RYBKA have revised sheet M4.06 to ductwork is to be fire rated in the attic space. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. The Area 3B mechanical room is a 2 hour rated room that ends at column line A 14. The ductwork that extends to the south across column line A 14 is 2 hour fire rated to avoid the installation of fire dampers in inaccessible locations. Fire dampers are shown in the penetrations of the two hour rated Area 3B mechanical room, where ductwork exist the mechanical room. A) The mechanical room on the 9th level over "AREA-03A"has not been addressed on the plan sheets. The partial ninth floor plan on 8 ''/z" x I 1 " indicate wrapping ducts. If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. Ductwork is to be wrapped to provide 2 hour fire rating in attic space. (Refer to Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03). Provide architectural details rated enclosure. B) In the mechanical room labeled 911 the rated walls do not appear to enclose the room entirely. The wall is labeled 30 minutes on the north end and the wall is labeled 1 hour where Trash 912 (above "AREA-0313") is located on sheet A0.3.09. There are 3 duct penetrations in this area to be addressed, 28x10 S/E F/B, 24x18 G/e F/B and 24x14 S/A F/A T/B. Rybka Response: Refer to Architectural Sheet A0.3.09 where Mechanical Room 911 is to be provided with 2 hour rating. Three ducts identified enter riser shaft from Mechanical Room 911 and riser is considered to be connected to and form part of mechanical room and so no fire smoke damper is provided. The ducts in question enter a shaft in the floor below within Maid Room G-711. Fire/Smoke Dampers are required where these ducts enter the shaft. One duct is not in a shaft. Please address accordingly. C) How will the 2 hour shaft assembly be maintained at EF-14 and EF-30? If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be rated for operation within rated enclosures by fan manufacturer or are to be relocated within Mechanical Room 911. Provide architectural details for the shafts. 214. Add a fire/smoke damper to the penetration by the 8x6 duct that penetrates the 30 minute fire partition on page M2.08.1 on grid line 11 and between A9 and A10. Rybka Response: Fire dampers are not required in one hour rated fire barriers per IMC 607.5.2. (Refer to Response No. 208.) This is not a fire barrier; it is a fire partition defining a rated corridor. A fire/smoke damper is required for this duct. Rybka Response: Combination fire smoke damper is provided where this duct exits the rated shaft. The response indicates an f/s damper has been added to the duct as exits the rated shaft. A smoke damper is required where it penetrates the rated corridor. 215. Fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Rybka Response: Mechanical floor plan sheets, sheets M2.01.1 thru M2.11.1 have been revised to show: It Combination fire smoke dampers (FSD) or shunt duct* on rated shaft penetrations. It FD in duct floor penetrations when no more than three floors are penetrated, and it FD on 2 hour rated wall penetrations. * shunt ducts per NFPA 90A (2002), Figure A.5.3. NFPA 90A is not an adopted document by the Town of Vail or referenced in the IMC. The review team is not familiar with the term "shunt duct". Fire smoke dampers are required at the shaft and corridor duct penetrations. (IMC 607.5.3, 607.5.4 and 607.5.5.1) Rybka Response: The 2006 IMC now calls the use of 22" upturned sheet metal ducts in 2 hour fire rated risers as 'sub ducts'. The provision ofthe'sub duct' is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. The use of sub ducts on the project is shown in Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03. M2.03.1 - Remove designations for shunt ducts for the ducts run in the garage exhaust shaft. Rybka Response: EF-8, EF-43 and residential dryer exhaust have been shown terminating in a vertical areaway (garage exhaust riser) that is always being exhausted by EF-1 B on emergency power. It was agreed during the June TOV plan review meeting that this condition is analogous to the 'sub duct' provisions identified earlier. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 2. In Group B and R occupancies equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 of the International Building Code, smoke dampers are not required at penetrations of shafts where kitchen, clothes, dryer, bathroom and toilet room exhaust openings with steel exhaust subducts, having a wall thickness of at least 0.019 inch (0.48 mm) extend at least 22 inches (559 mm) vertically and the exhaust fan at the upper terminus is powered continuously in accordance with the provisions of Section 909.11 of the International Building Code, and maintains airflow upward to the outdoors. The drawings are still substantially incomplete when labeling FSD's. I will attempt to identify some locations. It will be up to the design team to identify all locations. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts exit rated shafts. All drawings are indicting F.D. on the bathroom exhausts where penetrating the shaft. There is an administrative modification request to eliminate dampers on the bathroom exhausts. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FD designations at restroom exhausts have been deleted where 'sub-ducts' are provided per the administrative modification. The drawings are indicating ducts from below and ducts from above. Please create a tag for sub-ducts and clearly mark the plans on all the ducts that are to be utilizing this system. M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-301 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 2-8x6 ducts and 1-10x6 duct. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-311 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 1-8x10 duct and 1-12x6. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-301 and C-311 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - All duct penetrations through the shafts are marked F.D. These are required to be FSD. There are too many to list individually. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts penetrate rated shafts. There are multiple places that indicate FSD's where an administrative modification has been requested to utilize a 22" sub-duct. Please coordinate. M2.04.1 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-401 and C-41 I to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.04.1 - There is a 14x10 duct supplying corridor C-411 missing a damper designation. The duct is near A9.9 and 11/11.4. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. This duct has changed size to 12x8 since last review. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) These are just a few of the un-complying damper designations, stopped review on this correction. Again, fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Reconfiguration is still necessary. 216. Ductwork, pipes and electrical are prohibited in an exit passageways unless serving the exit passageway. It appears that above non-rated ceilings in the exit passageways the space is being used as a plenum and contains construction elements not allowed, please address all exit passageways. Rybka Response: Mechanical services not associated with exit passageways have been relocated. The review team's interpretation of IBC 1020.5 is that any ductwork serving an exit passageway shall be a completely separate system from the rest of the building and separate from all other passageways. Also, this system is required for pressurization. 1020.5 Penetrations. Penetrations into and openings through an exit passageway are prohibited except for required exit doors, equipment and ductwork necessary for independent pressurization, sprinkler piping, standpipes, electrical raceway for fire department communication and electrical raceway serving the exit passageway and terminating at a steel box not exceeding 16 square inches (0.010 m2). Such penetrations shall be protected in accordance with Section 712. There shall be no penetrations or communicating openings, whether protected or not, between adjacent exit passageways. Rybka Response: It is our understanding that only portions of the building service systems that serve the exit enclosure are allowed to penetrate the exit enclosure. We note that IBC 1019.1.3, VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURE, VENTILATION, Item .2 permits HVAC equipment (FCUs) to be located in the exit enclosure: 10 19.1.3 Ventilation. Equipment and ductwork for exit enclosure ventilation shall ....where located within the building, be separated from the remainder of the building, including other mechanical equipment, with construction as required for shafts. All ductwork serving the exit passageways shall be protected at the point of penetration of the passageway with a fire/smoke damper. The passageway is an extension of the vertical exit enclosure that it serves and lesser protection is not allowed. (1017.1) Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, and have provided FSD where make-up air ductwork penetrates the exit enclosure. M2.03.I- There is a duct termination shown in Stair Q exit enclosure, labeled "16x12 Employee Dryer T/A". This is not allowed in an exit enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been revised to show routing of dryer exhaust so that it does not pass through Stair Q. M2.04.1 - There is an 8x6 duct penetration within the exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.04.1 - There is a transfer opening 24x4 within exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization; this transfer opening is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.05.3 - There is a 6" duct shown penetrating Stair N exit enclosure. Please move out of the enclosure. (IBC 1019.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.05.3 has been revised and ductwork has been rerouted so as not to pass through Stair N. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-601 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the elevator lobby and maid's room. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-601. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 3.3/4 and A11. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - There is a duct penetration between Exit Passageway C-601 and Stair S-601. Penetrations are not allowed. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-611 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-611 is not deliberate and is to be deleted. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 and a 12x6 duct passing through Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. Grid lines 11/11.4 and A8.2/A9.9. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There is a 20x10 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-611. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 133/134.3 and BC/BD. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.2 - There is a 12x10 duct penetrating the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that Stair S-605 is connected to exit passageway C-614. and that the 'unlabeled passageway' is rated 2 hours, this upper level of the hallway is rated to provide separation between levels 4 and 5 and this portion of the ceiling space does connect to a rated vertical exit enclosure, the hallway is not an exit passageway, and that 1020.5 does not apply. M2.06.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: See previous comment. M2.07.2 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-717 are not intended to function as returns, are to be shown 'blanked-off and are provided for aesthetic reasons only. M2.07.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.3 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.08.1 and M2.08.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-803. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. Penetrations are not allowed fire wrapped or not. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. These comments are still outstanding. Tim Willings P.E. with Rybka met with the plans examiner on 8/14/07 to bring updated drawings addressing these corrections. It was advised to submit the drawings when all other comments are addressed. 222. Please address the garage exhaust on the east side of the structure that will cause a nuisance thru the casement windows (W 102) in rooms 5318, 6318 and 7318. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet A2.05.2 for plan location, and sheet A0.7.2 (W 102) for window type. Architect to revise window to be fixed type. HGA Response: The architectural documents have been revised to provide fixed windows at these three locations. The architectural drawings are indicating windows W 102. This window is casement not fixed on sheet A0.7.2. Please coordinate. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Revised drawings indicating fixed windows at these locations are included with this resubmittal. Since this review, the Town of Vail has informed our review team that garage exhausts on the CO2 detectors are product-conveying outlets requiring being 10' above grade, 10' from openings into the building and 10' from property lines. The continuous fan is considered environmental, thus allowing 3' from openings and 3' from property lines. Please address accordingly. 224. Please indicate how the 18" flue from the gas ironer, on the 3rd level is routed thru the loading dock above on the 4th level. Rybka Response: Laundry gas-fired flat ironer vent leaves the laundry room at level 3 (Sheet M2.03.1) and runs vertically through the building in a rated chase with fire enclosed offsets before being vented at the roof of level 11 (Sheet M2.1 L I M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Provide architectural details for the shaft. 228. Specify on the plans the location of EC-1, Type I fan for the kitchen. Rybka Response: Sheet M4.04 has been revised to show Ecology Unit EC-1 in Ecology Room M-402A. Ecology Room M-402A as designed is a component of the grease duct enclosure. "The duct enclosure shall serve a single grease exhaust duct system and shall not contain any other ducts, piping, wiring or systems." Remove the other exhaust fans, ducting and electrical within the room not associated with the Type 1 duct. (IMC 506.3. 10) Rybka Response: The 2 hour rated architectural enclosure of the Ecology unit has been reconfigured to that only the ductwork and equipment associated with the commercial kitchen exhaust is contained within the Ecology Room M-402A. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour wall and 90 minute door that is shown on the mechanical drawings. 233. Indicate on the plans that the 36" dryer duct and the 18" flue from the Ironer are in a 2 hour shaft on the 6th level, page M2.06.1. Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, the 36" dryer exhaust duct and 18" gas-fired flat ironer vent that both run horizontally at level 6 (on sheet M2.06.1) are to be in a 2-hr fire rated enclosure. M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. (from comment 224) Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour shaft walls and details for construction. Please show compliance to IBC 707.11 for the bottom of the shaft housing the 34" dryer duct. 234. Provide manufacturers instructions to verify the dryers in rooms 312 and 31 OD are capable of exhausting the developed length shown on the plans. Rybka Response: Residential dryer exhaust system shown on Sheet M2.03.1 serving Employee Laundry Room 31 OD and Valet Room 317, with quantity five (4+1) dryer exhaust connections to dryer exhaust EF-43 has been rerouted. In addition to the lint filter integral to the appliance, and auxiliary lint trap and cleanout has been shown on the common dryer exhaust duct system before the duct leaves the Employee Laundry Room 31 OD. The entire length of the residential dryer exhaust duct is to be fire wrapped to maintain clearances to combustibles. Discharge of laundry dryer exhaust is routed to exterior via connection to rated garage exhaust riser. Penetration is protected by fire wrap and minimum 22" shunt duct extended into garage exhaust riser. In addition, RYBKA have specified a laundry exhaust booster fan EF-43 which is interlocked with dryer operation. Dryer exhaust ducts are required to terminate to the outside the building and shall be equipped with a back draft damper, also clothes dryer exhaust ducts shall not extend into or through ducts or plenums. Route the dryer ducts directly to the exterior with a back draft damper. (IMC 504.4) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by showing the backdraft damper. The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 238. The Laundry Layout, page LA1.2, indicates a flue pipe for the dry cleaner in room 4317. Add the flue and the 2 hour chase to the architectural sheets and to the mechanical sheets, clarify that it does not pass through a plenum. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.03.1 to show dry cleaning machine exhaust fan EF-8 and ducted connection to outdoors. M2.03.1 - The termination is shown with a 22" sub-duct within the garage exhaust duct. This is not to the exterior as required per IMC 502.7.3.6. The review team also is concerned that when the garage exhaust is not operating the fumes from the dry cleaning can migrate to the garage. Terminate the dry cleaning exhaust to the exterior. Rybka Response: The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 244. Add a 2 hour shaft below and proper opening protection for the duct designated as 24x14 S/A F/A-24x12 S/A TB on page M2.08.1 on grid line l0A and between 10.5111. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1 and relocated the duct riser to the protected shaft in the North West corner of the Maids Room G-811. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by properly coordinating the duct offset/riser transfer shown at this level with rated shaft location or rating requirements. These two ducts that transition between shafts that are not aligned between the 8th and 9th floor levels are both to be shown enclosed in a 2 hour rated drywall enclosure, negating the need for combination fire smoke dampers, except where duct connections penetrate the shaft wall (one location). The duct on this level is indicating 24x14 S/A(supply air) F/A(from above). The 9th floor level or the enlarged M4.06 does not show this duct. Please clarify. 245. Add a 2 hour shaft or designate a fire damper for the 28x10 and the 28x14 as it passes through a 2 hour floor/ceiling assembly into the mechanical room above. On page M2.08.1 between grid lines 10.5 /11 and A8.2/A9.9. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that ducts that rise vertically through the building that are protected with two hour fire rated enclosures and are connected to a 2 hour rated mechanical room at the highest level do not have a fire damper at the floor penetration of the mechanical room. Rybka submits that the 2 hour rated shaft enclosure is an extension of the 2 hour rating of the mechanical room fire rated enclosure. There is a 24x10 duct shown penetrating the shaft connecting to the 28x10 duct within the shaft. Add the S/F damper at this location. (The architectural overlays indicate a shaft too small to house the duct?) There is a 24x18 duct shown in this vicinity penetrating the floor/ceiling above. Please address with a fire damper. 246. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 8x10 duct on page M2.07.2 between grid lines A8.2/A9.9 and 10/10.5. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1. The duct has not been addressed on all levels also see comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by coordinating the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7, 8, 9 and 10 and attic levels (Sheets M2.07.2, M2.08.2, M2.09.2, M2.10.2 and M2.11.1). Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft wall (one location each occupied floor). The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands, the duct in question has been changed to 12x18 on the 7th level. 247. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 12x6 duct on page M2.07.1 between grid lines A6/A7 and on grid line 4.2. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1, M2.08.1, M209.1. This duct serving the elevator lobbies has not been addressed. Rybka Response: Rybka will coordinate the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7 in this location with level above and below. Rybka will correct this by rerouting existing ductwork through rated risers provided by HGA in these locations and Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft . The same issue as response to #246. The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands. The supply duct from level 1 1 to 10 has no shaft, the duct runs horizontally on the 9th level with no shaft and runs to the 7th level with fire dampers at the floors of the 8th and 9th. This duct requires a shaft. 264. Fire dampers and rated shafts for ductwork through floor/ceiling assemblies are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Refer to response to comment 215 Here are some floor penetrations by ducts that have not been addressed, please evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. M2.03.1 - 12x20 duct, grid lines A4.6 and 2.7/3 The duct in question has changed to 20x16. The vertical and horizontal shafts need to be shown on the architectural sheets. M2.03.1 - 18x 14 duct, grid lines A12 and 3.3/4 The horizontal shaft shown on M2.02.1 is not shown on the architectural sheets. M2.04.1 - 16x10 duct, grid lines A13 and 3.3/4 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.04 - 12x6 duct, grid lines A 10/A 11 and 10.5/11 A fire damper has been added to the 2 floors above. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. M2.04 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10/AI I and 10.5/11 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. The duct is connecting more than 2 stories below the shaft. M2.04 - 6x12 duct, grid lines A10 and 10.5 The drawings have been changed to add fire dampers at the floor line. This duct connects more than 2 stories, a shaft is required. M2.05 - 26x14 R/A, grid lines A6/A7 and 5 A fire damper is required at the floor between the 5th and 6th level. M2.05 - 12x12 paint shop exhaust, 12x12 carpenter exhaust and a 24x12 sanitary duct, grid lines A4.6 and 4/5. These ducts traverse from what appears to be a rated shaft from below through the Resid. Club Concierge Desk (512) room up through the ceiling with no protection. This duct enters a shaft on this level, add a fire damper to the duct as it enters the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.05 - 6x6, 8x6, (2)12x6 and 10x20 ducts, grid lines Al0 and 10110.5 M2.05 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A 10 and 10.5111 Review on duct penetrations through the floors has been stopped. The plans examiner's function is not to make a punch list for the design team. Evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that fire dampers, rated shafts and combination fire smoke dampers have been added to the floor plans in general conformance with requirements of the plan reviewer. Additional damper, combination fir dampers and shaft wall construction will be required where this drawing revision has not correctly identified that they are required. Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. Structural Conditions- The conditions listed are taken from the last comment letter dated 07/18/2007. The open issues are listed in Red. S106 F 9,11,14/S6.01E Sheet S2.03.2: 12 ft. cantilever retaining wall extension of exterior two span wall below, outside of ballroom areaway on line A 11 between 14 and 14.5 has not been checked and appears to be overstressed for flexure, please check. Consider moment resisting joints at slab to wall connections. Design / detail planter wall. These details require rebar and splices to be shown for proper detailing and construction. Verify cantilever deflection. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S110 F S2.02.4 No calculations have been provided for the cantilevered retaining wall around the pool structure, or on gridline D1. Verify lateral load capacity, consider pedestrian surcharge and water surcharge due to site drains behind this wall as appropriate. Verify footing width. KL&A 6/26/07: Wall in question between gridlines 6-8.5 south of A 18 supports roof loads and also is the lateral load path for pool structure loading, and for roof uplift for partially enclosed structures. Wall also is monolithic with Area 3A perimeter building wall. Design is part of EOR's scope, please provide wall designs accounting for support of roof structure. KL&A 8/31/07: Coordinate new retaining wall detail 21/S4.03 with foundations shown on plan, S2.02.4. Verify new steel roof around pool structure will resist lateral soil reaction of 1.0 klf, verify metal deck shear strength and connection to resisting perpendicular retaining walls. S128 GS S2.09.3 Top slab bars 1 OT3 & l OT6 are shown at line 10.6/A 14. It seems these bars are shown in error as the concrete beam is upturned at this location. Beams south of line A12.2 are not identified. Please check. IBC 1603.1. KL&A 6/26/07: Top bars also appear required at gridline A10. S2.09.3 PT profile is incomplete, details are required. KL&A 8/31/07: Top bars are still not shown on plan, please review. S145 LS 1/S3.02C Wall thickness is shown as 8 inches. Plan S201.2 indicates a 12" exterior foundation wall, please coordinate. KL&A 6/26/07: Coordinate reinforcing shown on shear wall elevation with 'W2' or'W3' per S2.01.2, it is unclear which wall type controls for soil lateral loading. Wall must span two way due to stair shaft opening, verify designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S164 LS S2.11 Provide detail of roof diaphragm to concrete cores. Provide or indicate detail of steel beams to concrete cores for gravity plus lateral loading, per ASCE 7-02 load combinations. Verify drag loads and chord force detailing at eave framing. Verify diaphragm welding is sufficient for expected shear forces, provide shear and moment diagram at roof deck levels. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7. KL&A 6/26/07: New detail 13/S 1.0.5B: Welded studs, thickness and dimensions of embed plate are not defined. Please provide this information for all beams and reaction conditions on the drawings. Verify connection is adequate with short slot or long slot holes in the shear tab, if permitted for erection. Provide roof diaphragm calculations per original comment. IBC 1911, 1912, 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S165 LS S2.11 Provide detail of concrete diaphragm to concrete cores, verify shear transfer at each level and comment whether any drags are required. Verify if typical details 12 & 23/S 1.0.3A apply throughout the job. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S169 LS S3.02A Calculations show a significant force reversal / back-stay effect from Level 6 to Level 5 shear force, i.e. SW 14 & SW 16. Verify this load path has been designed for the loads per 3D analysis. Verify soil plus wind / seismic loading has been used for drag design. Note per plan, S2.05.1, a large hole exists adjacent to wall SW 16, and per calculations page 536, (38+57)=95k shear transfer is required. No drags are shown on plan. Please verify. Note, elevations S3.02A show #5 @ 14" o.c. at upper levels, calculations shown (2) #5 @ 24" o.c., please verify designs match calculations. IBC 1616.1.1, IBC 1604.4. KL&A 6/26/07: Original comment calculated (38+57)=95k load for SW 14 not SW 16 as noted, however collector bars have not been added for SW 14. SW 16 collector load is (86+143)=229k, (4) #7 shown on plan are not adequate for 229k, please review all collector designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S171 S2.11.1-2, etc. Roof framing plans are incomplete. Please address the following and confirm detailing will be provided in future drawings issues, per IBC 1604.2, 2205.1. a) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed b) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed c) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed d) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed e) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed f) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed g) W8 & W 16 eave supports do not cantilever outwards and support eave in RAM analysis submitted, instead all load is transferred directly to columns via eave rim beam. Verify eave supports and perimeter girders are adequately sized KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. h) S2.09.3, etc: HSS6x6 to W8, W 14 moment connection at eave needs a detail KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. i) I/S2.10.3: WI 6x31 on line Al 0.5 is shown as WI 805 per calculations, please verify all beams match calculations. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S172 1/S2.08.3 W18x46 eave support girder near gridlines CB-CI is shown as W21x44 per calculations; W 1400 on line BE is shown as W21 x48 per calculations. Several cantilevered eave moment connection supports are shown without a backspan member. Please review. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 1/S2.08.3 Verify lateral support of the low roof structure for wind and seismic loading; low roof section is not connected to Level 8 PT slab beyond or core walls within the roof area, and braced frames are not shown. Similar at 2/S2.08.3 and other low roof structures. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 11,26,28/S7.0] A Calculations indicate that roof deck is attached to slab edge along line 2 and other locations where deck and floor slab are near the same elevation. Provide a detail for lateral roof to slab connection where required by lateral analysis. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S174 S2.11.1, etc Show roof diaphragm to concrete core connection, consider in-plane collector shear forces and out of plane anchorage forces. IBC 1604.8.2; ASCE 7, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S175 S2.11.1 Verify diaphragm continuity at dormers line A5 between upper roof deck and lower roof deck, provide collectors as required for in plane shear and out of plane shear. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S176 S2.09.2 Roof ridge support columns nearl 5.5-A4.8 shown on S2.11.2 are not supported by slab below, please check. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Column in question is 20 feet tall, verify HSS5x5 is adequate, per S2.11.2. S178 A2.11.1 R, etc. Structural roof plans do not incorporate snow fences shown on architectural drawings. Please provide snow fence with adequate structural connection shear and moment associated with sliding snow. IBC 1608. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. KL&A 8/31/07: COMMENTS ON NEW DETAILS FOLLOW S187 21/S4.03 Minimum depth shall be 48" for frost depth requirement. IBC 1805.2.1. Verify wall vertical rebar is adequately developed at top of footing, ACI 318, 12.2. Appears that variables D and D' are reversed with calculations variables hf and hp, please review. IBC 1806. S188 S5.03 Revised beams 4138 & 4139 appear too shallow to support one way slab at ramp. Shear ties are spaced greater than d/2. Please review beam sizes for ramp loads. IBC 1604.2. Planning Department Conditions- From: Warren Cambell Submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval prior to requesting a TCO. Public Works Conditions- From: Chad Salli, Project Engineer 1. Install snowmelt in loading dock dwy. Sheet M5.15 not in resubmittal package, Sheet M5.14 shows heat in the southern half of the dwy. The dwy should be heated from the back of pan along the Frontage Rd to the trench drain. 2. The fountain entry feature shall not be public right-of-way, please remove from right-of-way. 3. The two tier retaining wall shall be designed/stamped by a Colorado registered professional engineer, greater than 4' in height from the top of wall to the bottom of the foundation. 4. Provide Final Drainage report including hydrology and hydraulic analyses (Box culvert, Storm pipe, inlets, swales, etc...). This shall include storm sewer profiles with HGL shown. A 100 yr analysis shall be completed showing no private/public property damage as a result. Provide capacity analysis for major swales and all inlets. The SCS method may be used for large mountain basins, the Rational method shall be used for the smaller site and developed basins. 5. A Developer Improvement Agreement will be required prior to release of permit. 6. Show proposed location for Comcast fiber line along the west property line. Frontage Road/Vail Road 1. Town of Vail Street lights shall be placed at 50' spacings along the project limits. Coordinate with TOV electricians for electric meter location. Relocate private lighting to private property. 2. Set back (detach) the frontage rd sidewalk 6' from back of curb east of the porte cochere exit. Sod shall be installed between the curb and walk. 3. Use attached sidewalk detail for sidewalks located within the right-of-way. 4. Use TY 13 curb inlets vs TY R where the sidewalk is attached to the curb. 5. If necessary, raise Spraddle Creek vault #I manhole to finished grade. 6. The cross-walk at the roundabout shall be asphalt thru the travel lanes and concrete only across the median. 7. Use CDOT TY 3A curb ramps at the roundabout, 6' width at the throat. 8. Storm line A shall be at 1% minimum slope. Leaving the existing proposed invert elev at TY R inlet 3 and working upstream at 1% appears to still allow for a min of 2' cover at the existing inlet on the north side of the frontage road. 9. Sheet E1.00, please turn off extra curb&gutter alignment. 10. Install 24" conduits to medians for irrigation and 34" conduits to the west median for future use. Spraddle Creek Drainage 1. Per previous agreement with the Town, Four-Seasons is responsible for the construction cost of continuing Spraddle Creek to STA 4+40. 2. Install an impermeable membrane around the RCP/CBC due to proposed landscaping and irrigation. 3. Please provide additional detail of proposed walls along the RCP/CBC alignment. Construction of these walls shall be designed so as not to disturb/undermine the RCP/CBC. W Meadow Drive 1. Final approval of the West Meadow Drive construction drawings will be completed in conjunction with the Town of Vail design. Modifications to tie-in grades on the Four Seasons site may be necessary to accommodate this final design. W Meadow plans shall also develop streetscape related items in the right-of-way (street lighting, landscaping, etc). 2. Storm line G alignment needs to be revised. There is not enough room to install between Spraddle Creek and a large tree on the south side of W Meadow that shall be protected. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. 3. Storm line E appears to in conflict with the recently installed water line. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. Landscaping/Irrigation 1. Detailed landscaping comments to follow within the next couple of weeks. 2. Coordinate irrigation with TOV irrigation supervisor for final head type/location and water source. 3. The Town is currently in talks with CDOT on permissible landscaping within CDOT right-of-way. Fire Department Conditions- l. LSR, MOU's and Administrative Modifications must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protection Engineer of record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not accepted. RJA allegedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence has not been presented. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans is not accepted. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additional review. Cond: CON0010349 Sub-duct system for the dryers and range hoods is not approved. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R090000604 Amount: $240.00 06/03/200903:52 PM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: LC Notation: CREDIT CARD - MARK M. REED Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 165,772.90 This Payment: $240.00 Total ALL Pmts: 165,772.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300, PLAN CK - project GFP012 240.00 SAFEbuilt,, COLORADO Building Department Services May 28, 2009 Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official, Town of 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: PROJECT: PERMIT NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: INTERNAL REF ADDRESS: Dear Mr. Haeberle: kyl aN Four Seasons, Vail B06-0196 28 9926 1 Vail Road SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Building Code as adopted by the Town of Vail. SAFEbuilt Colorado finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction. Plans: A9.3.03 delta 3-1-inear Diffuser A9.01.1 delta 1-Door Jamb A9.3.03 delta 3-Shaft wall ceiling Plan review fee: 4 hours = $240.00 No additional square footage- No added valuation Sincerely, Eric Pendley Builing Official SAFEbuilt Colorado eric.pendley(&SAFEbuilt.com Page 1 of 1 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓Z:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov-B06-0196 rev28 FAL.doc +7 ~ 1% S A F builtinc Building Department Services MAY 12 2009 TOWN OF VAIL SAFEbuilt Colorado PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS TO: Contractor Architect Layton Construction Hill Glazier Architects EMAIL: mreed laytonconstruction.com Attn: John Curtis pdaleyC&-laytonconstruction.com 479-7849 FAX icurtis6a0ksinc.com RE: Exit Passageway Conditions NUMBER OF PAGES: FROM: DATE: BUILDING PERMIT INTERNAL REFERENCE REV. OWNERS NAME: SITE ADDRESS: SUBDIVISION: OCCUPANCY GROUP: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: NUMBER OF STORIES: 2 John Plano 04/23/09 B06-0196 9926 28 Four Seasons Resort 1 Vail Road Vail Mixed 16 10 Town W Veil OFFICE COPY The design documents submitted for this project have been reviewed for compliance with the locally adopted codes and amendments. The following comments must be addressed before a building permit is issued. For processing: . Please submit (3) complete sets of revised construction documents containing the requested information or plan revisions with all revisions clouded or otherwise identified. . Please respond in writing to each comment by marking the attached list or creating a response letter. Indicate which plan sheet, detail, specification, or calculation shows the requested information. Please send revisions to the attention of the plans examiner with the building permit application number noted. Responses such as "will comply with code" are not adequate. Revised drawings must clearly show code compliance. A RESPONSE LETTER MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THE REVISED PLAN SUBMITTAL. Please be sure to include on the resubmittal the engineer's or architect's "wet" stamp, si nature registration number and date on the cover page of any structural calculations, all structural details and structural sheets of the plans. For commercial or multi-family projects all sheets of the plans must be stamped. V:\02028\Admin\Plan Check\Bulletins\93 & 94\tov_b06-0196 rev28 ir9926 (5) with HKS Responses.doc Page I of 3 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The approved drawings indicate that the exit passageway walls are stand alone metal framed walls rated 2 hours. There are no penetrations or openings that do not serve the passageway, as required by IBC 1020.4 and 1020.5. The design was such that there is to be a separate wall framed on the unit side of the passageways to house the plumbing and electrical to serve the units. The contractors did not frame the non- rated wall, the plumbing and electrical is installed within the 2 passageway walls. There is also piping, ducting and electrical systems installed within the exit passageway above the non-rated ceiling that is not allowed. The re-submittal needs to be presented as a performance based solution to the prescriptive requirements of the code, The submittal is to be sealed and signed by the Fire Protection Engineer of record. Please use the International Performance Code Chapter One for reference regarding submittal documents. HKS Response: We disagree that )o roitnanc 7ti inSid i! ('T the plan check process (2006), HK,S. MMM, RJR, as of discussions and meetings regarding the exit passageways, how they need to be constructed, and nuances of the specific requirements. We believe the passageways, as shown in the current documents, comply with those discussions and the agreements that resulted. Please refer to attached document that records Safebuilt's 8114108 comment regarding ductwork within selected passageways and MMM's 8127108 response. Further, this document was used record agreement between MMM, Safebuilt, and TOV as reached during their 8121108 meeting. In summary, we submit that a performance-based solution is not necessary. Further. RJA has reviewed the detailed design of the passageways and provided the attached evaluation letter concurring with code compliance. 2 This submittal did not address the plumbing that is installed in the 2 hour walls. Please provide a method of maintaining the 2 hour integrity of the wall and isolate these pipes from the assembly. These penetrations are not allowed per IBC 1020. HKS Response: Detail 20, A9.6.01 snows a UL listed assemoiy inat is cu: suucre~i 1i c rl'-- Slut-, ,,r iirt, metal studs and allows piping to remain in its current location. See attached diagram that clarifies this approach. 3 Sheet SDA-BUL-094-02 indicates a fire damper to be installed for the ventilation penetrations/openings of the passageways. These ducts will be required to be protected with fire/smoke dampers. This was addressed during the original review in comment #216. Once given a level of protection, that protection shall not be reduced. The passageway is an extension of the vertical exit enclosure that it serves and lesser protection is not allowed. (IBC 1017) 1 1; Reslnor sc: See attached response letter from MM AT 4 Please incorporate the 2 hour ceiling and the electrical penetration situations into the new submittal and included in the evaluation by the Fire Protection Engineer. HK Response, She!_ shows {1?al` wall construction around light hxtc,res with a note indicating that ho petit, a i )oved except for those serving the passageway. For allowed penetrations, they will be fire-stopped per section 15 of the general notes on A0.2.2. See also RJA's evaluation letter, dated 51712009. Please refer to the cover sheet for information and instructions for resubmitting plans. In order to avoid delays please check all requested information is included with the resubmitted plans. Plan Review Comments Contact Person: John Plano Plans Examiner/Senior Inspector SAFEbuilt V:'0202&Admin Plan Check Bulletins,93 & 94.tov-b06-0196 rev28 ir9926 (5) %%ith HKS Responses.doc Page 2 of 3 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue. Unit 101 ✓ Eagle. Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 4284A 12 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 1286 Chambers Ave. #101 PO Box 1618 Eagle, CO 81631 (970)328-1790 V: 02028'Admin Plan CheLk Bulletins 93 & 94'tov 606-0196 rev28 ii-9926 (5) with IiKS Responses.doc Page 3 of 3 SAPEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 -1 1286 Chambers Avenue. Unit 101 ✓ Eagle. Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 **"X MMM GROUP MMM Group Ontario Limited I .'nmmariF Valley Drne VJea1 Tliwnhill ON Canada ; T (W Z 90i 88,' 100 1 t 905 8,82.0055 May 1, 2009 Mr. D. Atmore HKS Hill Glazier Studio HKS Architects, Inc. 925 Palo Alma Street Palo Alto, California 94301-2405 Re: Four Seasons Resort Vail, Colorado Response to Plan Review Comment #3 for the passageways Our File No. 1807286-000 Dear Mr. Atmore, This letter is in response to comment #3 of the plan check letter issued by SAFEBuilt for the review of the passageways (see copy attached). All the ducts feeding the fire-rated diffusers located in the fire-rated shaftwall ceiling, when they enter the passageway shell and penetrate the vertical walls of the passageway, they are protected by combination fire smoke dampers. If there is smoke coming through the ducts from other areas than the passageway, then the smoke will be stopped by the fire smoke dampers, where the ducts are penetrating the vertical wall of the passageway. This works also the other way too: if there is smoke in the passageway, it will be stopped also at the fire smoke damper locations, where the ducts are penetrating the passageway vertical wall, and the smoke will not migrate into other areas. I think that the combination of fire rated diffusers with the fire smoke dampers on the vertical wall, together with the fire rated shaftwall ceiling, do provide the adequate fire and smoke protection of the passageway, not a lesser protection. Yours very truly, MMM GROUP LIMITED Adrian Duta, P. Eng. Deputy Manager Mechanical Engineering V:1P ROJECTS07T 1 80728600voWAD09MAY01. LET.doc 79 PJA 600 west Fulton meet Suite 500 ROLF JENSEN & ASSOCIATES INC. Chicago, IL 60661 USA , FIRE PROTECTION CONSULTANTS www.rjoinc.com +1312-879-7200 Fax: +1312-879-7210 May 7, 2009 VIA EMAIL: datmore(cD-hksinc.com Mr. Doug Atmore Hill Glazier Architects 925 Alma Street Palo Alto, California 94304 FOUR SEASONS VAIL - FIRE PROTECTION EVALUATION OF 2 HR EXIT PASSAGEWAYS Dear Doug: You have requested that Rolf Jensen & Associates (RJA) evaluate the 2-hour exit passageway fire-resistance-rated assemblies listed in Bulletins 93 & 94, issued by HKS/Hill Glazier Studios on April 3, 2009 for compliance with the 2003 International Building Code (IBC) as adopted by the Town of Vail and with our Life Safety Report, dated May 22, 2007. Due to the installation of mechanical, plumbing and electrical elements not permitted within an exit passageway enclosure, Bulletins 93 & 94 have modified the previously approved construction documents to include the following fire resistance rated assemblies: (Copies of each assembly are included with this letter.) 1. UL U529 for construction of a 2-hour non-bearing rated wall assembly. This construction allows existing plumbing penetrations and electrical devices to remain as installed on the room side because the 2-hour protection is provided entirely on the passageway side of the studs; 2. WHI 495-SH-0154/0167 (Report# NER 258 and ER 5693) for construction of a 2 hour horizontal lid (specifically, system G of this report, as required for 2 hour construction); and 3. SpecSeal Power Shield Box Inserts within electrical boxes penetrating the exit passageway membrane (UL R14288 - wall opening protective material). Only mechanical, plumbing or electrical equipment serving the exit passageway are permitted to be located within the 2 hour enclosure. The above listed assemblies and materials are intended to remove equipment and elements that do not serve the enclosure from the exit passageway. ® 2009 Rolf Jensen & Associates, Inc. All Rights Reserved 0 No SEEN 0 so MMMMMMMMMMMM FOUR SEASONS VAIL Page 2 - V31063 EXIT PASSAGEWAY FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED ASSEMBLIES May 7, 2009 In all cases, RJA found the above listed assemblies and materials appropriate for the protection of exit passageways at the Four Seasons Resort, provided these assemblies and materials are installed as required by the UL certification or NER reports. RJA reviewed the bulletin documents and found that the detailed assemblies meet these installation requirements. Regarding electrical fixtures at the rated lid, in accordance with IBC Section 1020.5, electrical raceway serving the exit passageway and terminating at a steel box not exceeding 16 square inches are acceptable provided the penetration is protected in accordance with Section 712 with an approved assembly. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this review Yours truly, ROLF JENSEN & ASF~, NO VY, 99 : w May 7, 2009 Sean Donohue, PE s%..v .•01~ Date SD;bp /ON A%-- V31063/Four Seasons 2HR exit passageways FRR eval 05-07-09 y BXUV.U529 Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI/UL 263 Page Bottom Design/System/Construction/Assembly Usage Disclaimer • Authorities Having Jurisdiction should be consulted in all cases as to the part cuiar requirements covering the Installation and use of UL Usted or Classified products, equipment, system, devices, and materials • Authorities Having Jurisdiction should be consulted before construction • Fire resistance assemblies and products are developed by the design submitter and have been Investigated by UL for compliance with applicable requirements The published information cannot always address every construction nuance encountered in the teld • When field Issues arise, It is recommended the first contact for assistance be the technical service staff provided by the product manufacturer noted for the design. Users of fire resistance assemblies are advised to consult the general Guide Information for each product category and each group of assemblies The Guide Information includes specifics concerning alternate materials and alternate methods of construction • Only products which bear UL's Mark are considered as Classified, Listed, or Recognized Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI/UL 263 See General Information for Fire Resistance Ratinas - ANSI/UL 263 Design No 0529 Apni 22, 2009 Nonbearing Wall Rating - 2 Hr 1. Support Angles - 1 in. by 2 in. "L" -runners formed from 25 MSG gals steel to support the wall along the perimeter Angles mechanically attached to structure spaced 24 in OC 2. Gypsum Board* - 1/2 in. thick, 4 ft wide, applied vertically and secured to support angles with I in. 'ong Type S steel screws spaced 12 in. OC. Applied vertically and secured to liner panels (with joints centered over liner panels) with 1-1/2 in long Type G steel screws spaced 24 in OC in both directions Joints of face layers offset 24 in AMERICAN GYPSUM CO - Type AG-C i CERTAINTEED GYPSUM INC - ProRoc Type C CERTAINTEED GYPSUM CANADA INC - ProRoc Type C CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY - Types C, IP-X2 LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC lypes LGFC C, I.GI-C C/A NATIONAL GYPSUM CO types FSK G, FSMR G, FSW G, I SK-C, FSMR-C, FSW-C PANEL REY S A - Type PRC TEMPLE-INLAND FOREST PRODUCTS CORP Type TG-C UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO - Types C, IP-X2 USG MEXICO S A DE C V types C, IP X2 3. Joint Compound - Applied uniformly to both surfaces of gypsum wallboard liner panels (Item 4) with a notched spreader, 1/4 n high by 1/4 in wide spaced I in OC 4. Gypsum Board* - 1 in thick, 24 in wide, liner panels applied vertically and secured to 1/2 In thick gypsum wallboard (with joints staggered min 12 In ) with 1 1/2 in long type G steel screws spaced 24 in OC in both directions CERTAINTEED GYPSUM INC - Types ProRoc ShaRliner, EGRG Shaftliner CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY - Type SLX NATIONAL GYPSUM CO - Types =SW, FSW-B UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO - Type 5LX USG MEXICO S A DE C V type SLX "Bearing the JL Classification Mark Last Updated on 2009 04 P? ti.ons? Notice of-Disclaimer 'age lop Copyriaht_0 7,009 Underwriters Lab_cratorle> Irlc,,,V The appearance of a company's narrie or product In this database does not in itself assure that products so identlfled have been manufactured under UL's Follow-Up Service. Only those products bearing the UL Mark should be considered to be Listed and covered under UL's Follow-Up Service Always look for the Mark on the product UL permits the reproduction of the material contained in the Online Certification Directory subject to the following conditions: 1. The Guide information, Designs and/or Listings (files) must be presented in their entirety and in a non-misleading manner, without any manipulation of the data (or drawings) 2. 1 he statement 'Reprinted from the Online Certifications Directory with permission from Underwriters Laboratories Inc." must appear adjacent to the extracted material In addition, the reprinted material must Include a copyright notice in the following format: 'Copyright 2009 Underwriters Laboratories Inc V r.. . •~I ,1;. An •r.eeor.not rit a•gr+,:a!•,n .v1,ii lei I .i1?fir! ;:idc:•i:Rn did k•+p,v~e 79a ` r \I i I FS;!LEGACY REPORT NER-258 Reissued July 1, 2008 Business Reglonal Office ■ 5360 Woftrian K11 Road Whittier, Cafiforria 90601 ■ (562) 699-0543 ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Regional Office ■ 900 Montclair Road SuiteA Bsmingham, Alabama 35213 ■ (205) 599-9800 www.icc-es..org Regional Office + 4051 West Flossm oor Road Country Club Flits, Illinois 60478 s (708) 799.2305 Legacy report on the BOCA'National Building Code/1990, the 1988 Standard Building Code®with 1989/1990 Revisions, the 1988 uniform Building CodeT'0 with 1990 Accumulative Supplement DIVISION: 09-FINISHES Section: 09260-Gypsum Board Assemblies REPORT HOLDER: USG CORPORATION 550 WEST ADAMS STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60661 EVALUATION SUBJECT: USG Drywall Shaft Partition Systems 1.0 SUBJECT USG' Drywall Shaft Partition Systems 2.0 PROPERTY FOR WHICH EVALUATION IS SOUGHT Fire Resistance 3.0 DESCRIPTION CAVITY SHAFT WALL SYSTEMS A. One-Hour Cavity Shaft Wall (Nonload-Bearing) 1. Two and one-half-inch-wide, minimum No. 25 gauge "J" floor and ceiling runners 2. One-inch-thick SHEETROCK brand Gypsum Liner panels 24 inches wide - no screw attachment 3 Minimum No. 25 gauge USG Steel C-H stud Screws not required to attach stud to runner E-shaped studs may be used for closure panels at end walls or columns (if "J" runners are used at end walls, the gypsum liner is fastened at the ends with 15/8 inch Type S screws 12 inches on center.) The H-Section of C-H stud normally faces shaft 4 A single ply 5/cinch USG SHEETROCK FIRECODE® Type C gypsum panels installed vertically with 1 inch Type S screws 12 inches on center in field and at edges - 6 inches from top, bottom and ends. Joints and screw heads are finished with SHEETROCK Joint Tape and SHEETROCK Joint Compound on this ply, when required for decorative purposes B. Two-Hour Cavity Shaft Wall (Nonload-Bearing) 1 Two and one-half-inch-wide, minimum No 25 gauge "J" floor and ceiling runner 2. One-inch-thick SHEETROCK brand Gypsum Liner Panels 24 inches wide - no screw attachment 3. Minimum No. 25 gauge USG Steel C-H stud Screws not required to attach stud to runner. E-shaped studs are used for closure panels at end walls or columns, or in lieu of C-H studs (if "J" runners are used at end walls, the gypsum liner is fastened at the ends with 15/a inch Type S screws, 12 inches on center.) The H- Section of C-H stud normally faces shaft 4, Gypsum panels attached as follows: a Base layer:'/2 inch SHEETROCK FIRECODE' TYPE C or % -inch SHEETROCK FIRECODE® Type X gypsum panels applied vertically with 1- inch Type S screws 24 inches on center in field and at edges Finish layer: '/Z inch SHEETROCK FIRECODE® Type C or 5/cinch SHEETROCK FIRECODE® Type X gypsum panels applied vertically or horizontally and attached with 1518 inch Type S screws at 12 inches on center In field and at edges - 6 inches from top, bottom and ends When applied vertically, the joints must be staggered with the joints in the base layer Joints and screw heads on outer layer only are finished with SHEETROCK Joint Tape and SHEETROCK Joint Compound when required for decorative purposes Fire Damper (optional) (not shown) -1'/2 hour curtain- type fire damper encased in a No 22 gauge galvanized sleeve, installed in a 48 inches wide x 36 inches high opening framed with E-Studs and J- Runners No 16 gauge galvanized steel, 1'/z inches x 1'/z inches mounting angles are attached to the damper sleeve on the face layer side of the wall only around all 4 sides of the sleeve using 2 inch long No 10 sheet screws 2 inches from each end and 6 inches o c. The mounting angles must be installed such that ICC-ES legacy reports are not to be construed as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not specically addressed not are they to be consa ued as an I endorsement of the subject of the report or a recommendation for its use There is no warranty by iCC Evaluation Service Inc express or implied, a to any finding or other matter in this report or as to any product covered by the report Copyright ®2008 Page 1 of6 Page 2 of 6 NER-258 an overlap of the wall of not less than 1 inch is maintained The angles are secured to the framed opening with the same type of screws (2 screws on each side angle 3 inches from each end; 3 screws on each head and sill angle with 1 screw in the center and 1 at each end 3 inches from ends) C. Two-Hour Cavityshaft Wall-Alternative(Nonload- Bearing) 1 Two and one-half-inch-wide, minimum No 25 gauge "J" floor and ceiling runners 2 One-inch-thick SHEETROCK brand Gypsum Liner Panels 24 inches wide - no screw attachment E. Three-Hour Cavity Shaft Wall (Nonload-Bearing) 1 Two and one-half-inch-wide, minimum No 25 gauge "J" floor and ceiling runners 2 One-inch-thicK SHEETROCK brand Gypsum Liner Panels 24 inches wide - no screw attachment 3 Minimum No. 25 gauge USG Steel C-H stud Screws not required to attach stud to runner E-shaped studs are used for closure panels at end walls or columns, or in lieu of C-H stud (If "J" runners are used at end walls, the gypsum liner is fastened at the ends with 1'/9 inch Type S screws, 12 inches on center) The H- Section of C-H stud normally faces shaft 3 Minimum No 25 gauge USG STEEL C-H stud Screws not required to attach stud to runner E- shaped studs are used fro closure panels at end walls or columns, or in lieu of C-H stud (If "J" runners are used at end walls, the gypsum liner is fastened at the ends with 15/9 inch Type S screws, 12 inches on center) The H-Section of C-H stud normally faces shaft One-half-inch USG SHEETROCK FIRECODEO Type C or %-inch SHEETROCK FIRECODE44 Type X gypsum panels applied vertically and attached with f- inch type S screws at 12 inches on center in field and at edges - 6 inches from top, bottom and ends Joints and screw heads are finished with SHEETROCK Joint Tape and SHEETROCK Joint Compound on outer layer only, when required for decorative purposes. Vertical joint must be staggered on opposite sides of the walls D. Two-Hour Cavity Shaft Sound Wall (Nonload- Bearing) STC Over 50 1 Two and one-half-inch wide, minimum No 25 gauge. "J' floor and ceiling runners ) 2 One-inch-thick SHEETROCK brand Gypsum Liner Panels 24 inches wide - no screw attachment 3. Minimum No. 25 gauge USG Steel C-H stud Screws not required to attach stud to runner E-shaped studs are used for closure panels at end walls or columns, or in lieu of C-H stud (If "J" runners are used at end walls, the gypsum is fastened at the ends with is/.- inch Type S screws, 12 inches on center.) The H- Section of C-H stud normally faces shaft 4 One and one-half-inch thick USG THERMAFIBER' Sound Attenuation Blanket 5 One-half-inch SHEETROCK FIRECODEe Type C or 5/8 inch SHEETROCK FIRECODEI Type X gypsum panels applied vertically and attached with 1-inch Type S screws at 12 inches on center. Joints and screw heads are finished with SHEETROCK Joint Tape and SHEETROCK Joint Compound on outer layer only, when required for decorative purposes. Vertical joints in the base layer must be staggered with the vertical joints in the finish layer USG RC-1 resilient channels at 24 inches on center horizontally and attached with 3/6 inch panhead screws 4 Gypsum panels attached as follows: a Base layer: 5/A inch SHEETROCK FIRECODER Type C gypsum panels applied vertically or horizontally with 1 inch Type S screws at 24 inches on center in field and at edges b. Middle layer: 5/9 inch SHEETROCK FIRECODE' Type C gypsum anels applied vertically or horizontally with I?' 9 inch Type S screws at 24 inches on center in field and at edges When applied vertically the joints must be staggered with the base and finish layer joints c Finish layer: 5/9 inch USG SHEETROCK FIRECODEs Type C gypsum panels applied vertically or horizontally and attached with 2Y4 inch Type S screws at 16 inches on center in field and at edges - 6 inches from top, bottom and ends Joint and screw heads on outer layer only are finished with SHEETROCK Joint Tape and SHEETROCK Joint Compound systems, when required for decorative purposes SOLID AND VENT SHAFT SYSTEMS F. Two-Hour24nch Solid Gypsum Partition (Nonload- Bearing) 1 No 22 gauge metal angles 2 One-half-inch USGSHEETROCK FIRECODE Type C gypsum panels laminated to core panels with SHEETROCK Setting Type Joint Compound. 3 One-inch USG V-Edge Gypsum Coreboard 2 feet 0 inch wide (attachment - No 22 gauge angle: 1 inch Type S screws). 4 No 22 gauge metal angles An alternative assembly sequence for F above: Where construction is limited to application of gypsum panels from one side, "L' runners are anchored to floor and ceiling with suitable attachments at 24 inches on center. If "L" runners frame an opening in concrete, a 2-inch-by-2-inch "L" runner is used to permit fasteners to be driven further from concrete edge. The 1 inch coreboard is fastened to angle runners with two 04-Inch Type S screws placed 3 inches in from each edge. Two layers of 112 inch USG SHEETROCK FIRECODEA Type C gypsum panels are aminated to one side of 1 inch ccreboard with all Page 3 of 6 NER-258 vertical joints being offset at least 3 inches. Joints need not be taped or finished on inside Alternative Construction: As an alternative for all of the above described constructions. Imperial Gypsum Base of the same thickness and core type shall be substituted for the gypsum panels. Joints on the face layer, other than the inside of shaft or duct partitions, may be covered with tape and the entire surface is covered with a minimum of Y46 inch of USG Veneer Plaster (Imperial or Diamond Interior Finish) in accordance with manufacturer's directions G. USG Cavity Shaft Wall System To provide a fire-resistive protection to corridor ceilings or the underside of stairs USG "J" runners are attached to all existing horizontal and vertical framing intersected at the boundaries of the area to be protected The "J' runners are attached to the existing framing members using mechanical fasteners spaced at a maximum of 24 Inches on center and having an assigned design load of 200 pounds in either shear or pullout USG C-H studs of the required gauge are attached to the "J" runners at 24 inches on center by means of two Types S-12, '1Z inch panhead screws to frame the walls and/or soffits of the enclosures. Comers of the enclosure which do not intersect existing framing are built up of two "J" runners fastened together with two Type S-12, '/Z inch panhead screws at 24 inches on center The USG C- H studs are fastened to the "J" runners as previously described. One-inch-thick SHEETROCK brand Gypsum Liner Panels, 24 inches wide, is installed on the interior face of the enclosure within the slots of the C-H studs No screw attachments are required. Where the Gypsum Liner Panel intersects the "J" runners against the existing horizontal and/or vertical framing, 1518-inch Type S screws are installed at a maximum of 12 inches on center Gypsum panels are attached to the exterior surfaces of the framing In the manner required for the fire- resistive rating as follows: One-hour construction consists of one layer of 5/a inch SHEETROCK FIRECODE' Type C gypsum panels applied parallel to the C-H studs, with all vertical joint on studs The panels are fastened to each C-H stud and end 'J" runners with 1-inch Type S screws 12 inches on center in the field and at edges Joints and screw heads on the outer face panels are finished with SHEETROCK Joint Tape and SH EETROCK Joint Compound. Two-hour construction consists of a base layer of inch SHEETROCK FIRECODE® Type C panels applied parallel to the C-H studs and attached with 1- inch Type S screws at 24 inches on center in the field and atedges The finish layerof 1/2-inch SHEETROCK FIRECODEeType C panels are applied either parallel or normal to the C-H studs, with joints staggered 24 inches from the base layer One and five-eights-inch Type S screws at 12 inches on center in the field and at edges fasten the finish layer Joints and screw heads on the outer layer only are finished with SHEETROCK Joint Tape and SHEETROCK Joint Compound USG Cavity Shaft Wall for Two-Hour Horizontal Membrane or Horizontal Duct Shaft Protection Basically the same as described in paragraph "G' above, but uses three layers of 1/2 inch SHEETROCK FIRECODEB Type C gypsum panels (See Figure Ill-H at the end of this report ) The base layer is applied identical to the base layer described in item G.2 above The second layer is applied the same as the base layer, except that joints are offset 24 inches and 15/8-inch type S screws are 4 inches on center The face layer is installed perpendicular to the C-H studs with 21/g inch screws 12 inches on center Butt joints in face layer fall between C-H studs and are secured with 11/i inch Type G screws 8 inches on center. Treatment of wallboard joints and fasteners is not necessary Materials USG Steel C-H studs are roll formed from ASTM A 526 steel having a minimum yield strength of 33,000 psi Cement for laminating - SHEETROCK Setting Type Joint Compound For taping and sealing joints - SHEETROCK Joint Tape and SHEETROCK Joint Compound. SHEETROCK FIRECODE* is a USG registered 4 trademark for a Type X core gypsum panel Type C is a USG trademark for an improved Type X core USG Type C panels may be substituted for any Type X gypsum panel permitted by the code, provided the panel thickness is the same 4.0 INSTALLATION USG Drywall Shaft Partition Systems shall be installed in accordance with the fire rated assembly details and other information contained in this report. 5.0 IDENTIFICATION Face panels are bundled in two panel groups and bound with a red, white and blue tape with panel designation printed on the tape SHEETROCK brand Gypsum Liner Panels are shipped unbundled in units with end banding The face and back paper is green. The long edges are paper wrapped and have a %7inch bevel on top and bottom edge The back of each liner panel has an Underwriters Laboratories, Inc Label that denotes UL design U438, lists USG File No R 1319 and identifies the panel as USG Type SLX (shaft liners fire-rated) 6.0 EVIDENCE SUBMITTED Results of fire-endurance tests conducted in accordance with ASTM E 119 Page 4 of 6 NER-258 7.0 CONDITIONS OF USE 3 System G shaft walls are limited for use as corridor ceilings or as the horizontal enclosure on the The National Evaluation Service Committee finds that, in their underside of stairs (i a "Stair Soffits") opinion, the USGCZ Drywall Shaft Partition Systems described in this report are alternates to types of fire-resistive 4 Assembly described in paragraph H may be used to construction specified in the 1990 BOCA National Building protect two-hour horizontal ducts (horizontal duct Code, the 1988 Standard Building Code with 1989/1990 shafts) or where a two-hour horizontal membrane is Revisions, and the 1988 Uniform Building Code with 1990 required and is not part of a floorrceiling or roof/ceiling Accumulative Supplement, subject to the following conditions: assembly This system is designed to support its own dead weight only and should not be used where there 1 The report does not include structural evaluation of is an attic or loft above, or any probability of storage the products listed 2 All cut openings and horizontal joints in metal-framed shaft partitions with coreboard must be cased with system metal framing s E IxE HEAD) This report is subject to periodic re-examination For information on the current status of this report, contact the ICC-ES. V r ' i . ; H EAD i 1, - . IE j E ~ I I t PLAN 1 1 1 I * t 1 14 71 1, 1 BASE M a 1 u Y _ t` 1 ALAN E{ s E' f t 1 BASE SYSTEM A SYSTEM B Page 5 of 6 NER-258 v 01 ~ HEAD a fiI I~'- I +,I PLAN ,i 1 t dl. BASE SYSTEM C v ~ r t~ F V. t i i t HEAD 3 it 1y~ilj FLAN 'i. tY If 1'I .i , L-J.: I I v f SASE SYSTEM E T C4 V AN X11 !i SE HEAD N .37 14 BASE v HEAD PL r~1 I' ,1 1 I _ BA SYSTEM D - D- r rte.-- ~ . {1 ~ t; , 11 h , j. . 1 s SYSTEM F Page 6 of 6 NER-258 I HOW A"Ombty 2 HOW AmfrWy 1. SHEETROCK BRAND , GYPSUM LINER PANELS Mxhanical Fastemmw3 24' *.c, sPaCNt9 Smsx }ass+~ed warWrg - load 200lbs - USG STEEL J RUINER UW STEEL. J -RUNNER L ! USG STEEL 1CM STUD SEALANT Ji 22' SHEE-MOCK BRAND FIRECOOE -C- CORE GYPSUM PANEL 2 Haug 54 SHEETROCK BRAND ARECOOE'~C'COPE STEEL STUD GYPSUM PANEL • 1 Hour 1 SYSTEM G USG STEL'L :)it STEEL 1-RLWZFR (JR) \ \ DUCT SURFACE POWER-ACTUATED FASTENER 2f O C (VERTICAL am b WITHDRAWAL HORMNTAt SW 1h Bwwo TYPESPANHEADBCREWB I SNEETR= 9RAND GYPSUAILNERFW*19 \ VSG STEEL 144AWVER WO STEEL C N STUD SHEETROM METAL. TRW - ACOMT" 5EALAW W SHRETROCK BRAND GYPSUM PANELS Ff V:C C CORE - J LAYERS CORN" REOEORCEMENT (JOINT T!tl:ATM£NT AM CORNER BEAM SYSTEM H OWEFLACTUATED FASTENER 2C 0C IERi1CAt OCO 4. WITHDRAWAL - IOMONTAL 3WIb SHEAM \iZy CLIV.R14288 Wall Opening Protective Materials Page Bottom Wall Opening Protective Materials See UgLge J_WfoL41atW for Wap Owning Protest!v4 Mat4~~A SPECIFIED TECHNOLOGIES INC SUITE 2 200 FVANS WAY SOMERVILLE, N3 08876 USA 814288 SpecSeal Power Shield Box Inserts, for use with flush device UL Listed Metallic Outlet Boxes without internal clamps Installed with steel mud rings in framed wall assemblies When orotective material Is used in outlet boxes on both sides of the wall as directed, the horizontal separation between outlet boxes on opposite sides of the wall may be less than 24 in. (610 mm) provided that the boxes are not installed back-to-back Installation shall comply with the National Electrical Code (NFPA 70) The max outlet box dimensions, hourly rating, type of stud, use of stud cavity insulation and type of faceplate are tabulated below Additional general construction features shall comply as follows: A Studs - Unless otherwise specified, the minimum stud width is 3 i/2 in, (89 mm) B Stud Cavity Insulation - Where indicated !n the table below, stud cavity Insulation to consist of min 3-1/2 in (89 mm) thick fiberglass (min 0 5 pcf or B kg/m3) or mineral fiber (min 4 pcf or 64 kg/m3) Unless Indicated as required, stud cavity insulation is optional C. Wall Design Stud composition is indicated in the table below. Wall construction shall comply with the individual U300, U400 or V400 Series Wall and Partition Design in the Fire Resistance Directory D. Pad Dimensions The minimum dimensions of the Insert pad are shown in the table below Pads may be cut to achieve dimensions shown in table and partial insert pads may be utilized Max Outlet Outlet Box outlet Pad Rating, Face Putty Size, Box Box Size, Cavity Plate Product in. (mm) Type Mfr in. (mm) hr Stud Insulation Type Ball FP23 2 x 3 x 2-114 (51 x 16 x 1 1/8 x 2-3/4 2 Stee; No Steel - 57) deep (48 x 70) EP23 2 x 3 x 2-1/4 (51 x /6 x 1 7/8 x 2-3/4 2 Steel Yes Plastic - 57) deep (48 x /0) tP23 2 x 3 x 2-1/4 (51 x 76 x - - 1-7/8 x 2-3/4 1 Steel or Yes Plast.c or - 57) deep (48 x /0) Wood Steel EP24 2 1/8 x 4 x 2 1/8 (54 x - - 1-718 x 3-3/4 2 Steel No Steel 102 x 54) deep (48 x 95) f EP24 2-1/8 x 4 x 2-1/8 (54 x - - 1-7/8 x 3-3/4 2 Steel Yes P!ast!c - 102 x 54) deep (48 x 95) EPZ4 2 1/8 x 4 x 2-1/8 (54 x - - 1-7/8 x 3-3/4 1 Steel or Yes Plastic or 102 x 54) deep (48 x 95) Wood Steel EP44 4 x 4 x 2 1/8 (102 x 102x - - 3-3/4 x 3-3/4 1 Steel No Steei 54) deep (95 x 95) EP44 4 x 4 x 2-1/8 (102 x 102x - - 3-3/4 x 3-3/4 2 Steel Yes Plastic - 54) deep (95 x 95) EP44 4 x 4 x 2 1/8 (102 x 102x - - 3-3/4 x 3-3/4 1 Steel or Yes Plastic or - 54) deep (95 x 95) Wood Steel EP45 4 11/16 x 4 11/16 x 2 - - 4-1/2 x 4-1/2 1 or 2 Steel or Yes Plastic or - 1/8 (119 x 119 x 54) (114 x 114) Wood Steel • deev EP45 4-1/2 x 5 x 2-3/8 (114 x 4-1/2 x 4-1/2 1 or 2 Steel or Yes Plastic or - 127 x 60) deep (114 x 114) Wood Steel EDa5 4-1/2 x 14 x 2 1/2 (114 x - 4-1/2 x 13-3/4 1 or 2 Stee or Yrs ?l:a,hc )r a . : a; 4 x 14l)) Nhio: Spec5eal Putty Pads, for use with flush device UL Listed Metallic Outlet Boxes installed with steel mud rings ar UL Listed Nonmetallic Outlet Boxes in framed wall assemblies. When protective material is used on outlet boxes on both sides of the wall as directed, the horizontal separation between outlet boxes on opposite sides of the wall may be less than 24 In. (610 mm) provided that the boxes are not Installed back-to-back Installation shall comply with the National c'ectriCal Code (NFPA 70). Min 3116 In. (5 mm) thick moldable putty pads are to be Installed to completely cover the exterior surfaces of the outlet box (except for the side or the outlet box against the stud) and to completely seal against the stud within the stud cavity Adjoining pieces of moldable putty pads to be overlapped approx 1/2 In. (13 mm) at the seam. An additional 3116 in (5 mm) thickness of putty to be formed around the connector securing the end of each Type MC cable, electrical metallic tube ('cMI) or conduit to the box When nonmetallic box is used with Type NM cable, a 3/16 In. (5 mm) thickness of putty shall be formed around the cable at Its connection to the box and extending a min of 1 in. (25 mm) The box composition, max device dimensions, hourly rating, type of stud and type of faceplate are tabulated below Additional general construction features shall comply as follows: A Studs Unless otherwise specified, the min,mum stud width Is 3-1/2 In 189 mm) B Stud Cavity Insulation - Unless Indicated as required, stud cavity insulation is optional and may consist of min 3-1/2 In (89 mm) thick fiberglass (min 0 5 pcf or 8 kg/m3) or mineral fiber (min 4 pcf or 64 kg/m3) C. Walt Design - Stud composition is indicated in the table below. Wall construction shall comply with the individual U300, J4U0 or V400 Series Wall and Partition Design In the Fire Resistance Directory 0. Metallic Outlet Boxes - Except as indicated in the table below, when steel outlet boxes are used and the boxes are interconnected by means of electrical metallic tube or conduit, a ball of putty is to be installed to plug the open end of each electrical metallic tube (EMT) or conduit within the outlet box When MC cable is used and/or when the outlet boxes are not Interconnected, the ball of putty is not required E. Nonmetallic Outlet Boxes the box manufacturer is indicated in the table below. Boxes shall bear a 2 hr rating under the "Outlet Boxes and Fittings Classified for Fire Resistance" category in the Fire Resistance Directory Max Outlet Pad Box Outlet Outlet Size, Rating, Face Putty Size, Box Box In. Cavity Plate Model in. (mm) Type Mfr (mm) hr Stud Insulation Type Ball - 4 x 4 x 2 118(102x Steel N A - 1 Steel or - Steel No 102 x 54) deep Wood - 4 x 4 x 2.1/8 (102 x Steel N A - 1 Steel or Plastic Yes 102 x 54) deep Wood - 4-11/16 x 4-11/16 x Steel N A - 1 or 2 Steel or Steel YeS 2 1/8 (119 x 119 x Wood 54) deep 4-1/2 x 5 x 2-3/8 (114 Stee? N A - 1 or 2 Steel or Steel Yes x 12/ x 6U) deep Wood 4-1/2 x 14 x 2 112 Steel N A 1 o,-2 Steel or - Steel Yes (114 x 127 x 60) deep Wood - 3-3/4 x 4 x 3 (95 x Polyvinyl Lamson & - 1 or 2 Wood - Plastic or N A 102 x 7b) deep Chloride Sesslons Steel 3-3/4 x 4 x 3 (95 x Phenolic Allied - 1 or 2 Wood Plastic or N A 102 x 76) deep Moulded Prods Steel - 3-3/4 x 4 x 3 (95 x Poiycarbonate Thomas & - 1 or 2 Wood Plastic or N A 102 x 76) deep Betts Steel 3-3/4 x 4 x 3 (95 x Phenolic Thomas & - 1 or 2 Wood Plastic or N A 102 x 76) deep Betts Steel - 2-1/4 x 3-3/4 x 2-3/4 Polyvinyl Pass & 1 or 2 Wood - Plastic or N A (57 x 95 x 70) deep Chloride Seymour Steel Spec5eal Putty Pads , for use with maximum 4 by 4 by 2-1/8 In. (102 by 102 by 54 mm) deep flush device UL Listed Metallic Outlet Boxes Installed with steel mud rings and with steel faceplates In 1 hr or 2 hr fire rated gypsum board wall assemblies constructed with min 5-1/2 In (140 mm) wide wood or steel studs and with stud cavities Filed with fiberglass (nom 0.5 pcf or 8 kg/m3) or mineral fiber (nom 4 pct or 64 kg/ms) ,nsulatton. When protective material Is used on outlet boxes on both sides of the wall as directed, the boxes may be installed back-to-back provided that the boxes on opposite sides of the wall are riot interconnected with conduit or, when interconnected, the open end of the conduit within the outlet box is filled with a ball of putty Installation shall comply with the National Electrical Code (NFPA 70). Min 3/16 in. (5 mm) thick moldable putty pads are to be installed to completely cover the exterior surfaces of the outlet box (except for the side of the outlet box against the stud) and to completely sea' against the stud within the stud cavity Adjo n+ng pieces of moldable putty pads to be overlapped approx 1/2 In. (13 mm) at the seam An additional 3/16 in (5 corn) thickness of putty to be formed around the connector securing the end of each type ^1C cable, electrical metallic tube (EMT) or conduit to the box SpecSsal EP23, EP24 and EP44 Power Shield Box Inserts and SpecSeal Putty Pads, for use with maximum 4 by 4 by 1-1121 or 2-1/8 in. (102 by 102 by 38 or 84 mm) deep flush device W Listed Metallic Outlet Boxes installed with steel mud rings and with steel or plastic faceplates in 1 hr or 2 hr fire rated gypsum board wall assemblies constructed with min 3-1/2 in. (89 mm) wide wood or steel studs. when both protective materials are used with outlet boxes on both sites of the wall as directed, the boxes may be installed back-to-back provided that the backs of the boxes are minimum 1/2 in (13 mm) apart and provided that the boxes are not interconnected Installation shall comply with the National Electrical Code (NFPA 70). Min 3/16 in. (S mm) thick moldable putty pads are to be installed to completely cover the exterior surfaces of the outlet box (except for the side of the outlet box against the stud) and to completely seal against the stud within the stud cavity. Adjoining pieces of moldable putty pads to be overlapped approx 1/2 in. (13 mm) at the seam. An additional 3/16 in. (5 ruin) thickness of putty to be formed around the connector securing the end of each Type MC cable, electrical metallic tube (EMT) or conduit to the box An Insert pad shall be installed to completely cover the back inside surface of each outlet box LastsAated on 2008 05-22 Questions' Notice pf Qfsc almer P84le Top Coltyrloht T) 2009 Underwriters Laboratories Im% The appearance of a company's name or product in thls database does not in itself assure that products so identified have been manufactured under UL's Follow-Up Service. Only those products bearing the UL Mark should be considered to be Listed and covered under JL s Follow-Up Service Always look for the Mark on the product UL permits the reproduction of the material contained in the Online Certification Directory subject to the following conditions: 1. the Guide Information, Designs and/or Listings (tiles) must be presented in their entirety and in a non-misleading manner, without any manipulation of the data (or drawings). 2 the statement Reprinted from the Online Certifications Directory with permission from Underwriters Laboratories Inc. must appear adjacent to the extracted material in addition, the reprinted material must include a copyr:ght notice m the following format: 'Copyright :go 2009 Underwnters i aboratories Inc d P. n*,es?In 2 Pr •~r gd to a'a Yi t,e arnr4 .1 :r 1 , saiz' V. C rrt .trth •u; a. 41-I :r•,.rr jr rt Ar .:r't ~t •i, it bulIt,t. Building Department Scrytcer, MMM GROUP TO: Contractor Layton Construction EMAIL: r>~r c:eci(cr?I rylur_ic;cm:~ti uc tion cunt ixl~rlcYCa).~tYtc7n-construclior~ c;t>m FAX NUMBER OF PAGES: FROM: DATE: BUILDING PERMIT INTERNAL REFERENCE REV. OWNERS NAME: SITE ADDRESS: SUBDIVISION: OCCUPANCY GROUP: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: NUMBER OF STORIES: Architect Hill Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore (650) 617-0373 4 W ohm Plano 08/14/08 B06-0196 7988 18 Four seasons Resort 1 Vail Road Vail Mixed 1B 10 The design documents submitted for this project have been reviewed for compliance with the locally adopted codes and amendments. The following comments must be addressed before a building permit is issued. For processing: Responses such as "will comply with code" are not adequate. Revised drawings must clearly show code compliance. TO A RESPONSE LETTER MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THE REVISED PLAN SUBMITTAL. Please be sure to include on the resubmittal the engineer's or architect's "wet" stamp, signature registration number and date on the cover page of any structural calculations, all structural details and structural sheets of the plans. For commercial or multi-family protects all sheets of the plans must be stamped. SAFF.built Colorado Nagle Office ✓ 11.0. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Nagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ 'roll Free: (877).,128-6,112 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 Page I of 8 building permit application number noted. 't exhaust. MMM Group are to prepare a subsequent submittal entitled RFPRESENTATIVE SUES DUCT EXHAUST RISER DIA(-,RAM. Fills document is to show a riser diagram of a representative exhaust system whore connections to the riser are protected by sub ducts in lieu of combination fire; smoke hampers and is to identify the exhaust fan, exhaust inlets, cfm for each, duct sizes, flow quantities, and pressure ribbon. in the ctuct system. (?.008.08. 27) -,t 3. Based on code section 1020.5 the Town of Vail and review team's interpretation is the exit passageways are to have independent ventilation systems. MMM Response: (2008.08.20) IBC 2003 Section 1021.5 uses the words "Penetrations into and openings through an exit passageway are prohibited except for required exit doors, equipment and ductwork necessary for independent pressurization, sprinkler piping, standpipes, electrical raceway for fire department communication and electrical raceway serving the exit passageway..." In order to achieve independent pressurization of the exit passageway, it is sufficient to serve the zone from a separately protected branch of ductwork from the air handling unit serving the larger floor area. An independent air handling unit is not required to achieve independent pressurization. As designed, the exit passageway has either (1) a branch of ductwork serving only the corridors and/or passageway on the floor above and/or below or (2) an independent branch of ductwork serving only that exit passageway. Each is protected with fire and smoke dampers on the penetration of the rated shaft and the branch duct serving the exit passageway. It is agreed that the level of protection currently provided these exit passageways is code compliant. (2008.08.27) In the-event that this level of protection for the exit passageway is not deemed adequate. active smoke control dampers (combination fire smoke dampers) can be provided under the control of the fire alarm system on the associated-stairwell pressurization systern (between the stairwell and the floor containing the exit passageway)-to allow the exit passageway to be 'independently pressurized' by means of the stairwell pressurization system.) a 4. Line item 14 - M2.04.1 - This sheet indicates louvers being added to laundry exhaust termination. Code required a back-draft damper and no screens. (IMC 504.4) MMM Response: (2008.08.20) IMC 2003 Section 504.4 specifically prohibits the use of 'screens' on laundry exhaust terminations, but does not preclude the use of architectural louvers selected such that the free area of the dryer exhaust louver does not obstruct the exhaust flow. IMC 2003 Section 504.4 does require that the dryer exhaust be provided with a (gravity) back draft damper. Please refer to sketch 15-392 M2.04.1 in attached change notice MCN#27 28 (Appendix 3) where the addition of this back draft damper is shown. SAFlibuill Colorado Faglc Ol7ius ✓ I'.O. Ilox 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, I1nit 101 ✓ l:aglc. Colorado 81631 1111ome: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Frcc: (977),128-6,112 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 I J l Page 3 or 8 24. 264 M2.04.1 -The 8x6 S/E T/A, A10/A11 and 10.5/11 requires afire damper where it enters the shaft above. The same duct is to be shafted on sheet M2.05.1 where it runs horizontal. MMM Response: (2008.08.20) MMM concurs, a small drywall enclosure is required so that a fire smoke damper can be installed for both supply and exhaust on level 4. Please refer to sketch 15-400 M2.04.1 in attached change notice MCN#27 28 (Appendix 3) Please refer to the cover sheet for Information and instructions for resubmitting plans. In order to avoid delays please check all requested Information Is Included with the resubmitted plans. Plan Review Comments 1286 Chambers Ave. Contact Person: #101 John Plano PO Box 1618 Plans Examiner/Senior Inspector Eagle, CO 81631 SAFEbuilt (970)328-1790 This response has been revised per the plan review meeting held 2008.08.21 it? the Town of Vail Office to reflect agreement reached with John Plano, Safe Built Inc and Martin Haeberle (Town of Vail). Tim Willings, PE j MMM Group Inc. (Rybka Smith and Ginsler Inc.) 7380 Sand Lake Road, Suite 500 Orlando, FL 32806 (407) 895-9535 i Geoff Hempel, P. Eng. MMM Group Ltd. (Rybka Smith and Ginsler Ltd.) 100 Commerce Valley Drive Thornhill, ON L3T OA1 l (416) 398-6020 x 3264 • ooPp,~O CIOF~v J. v:o y:o 37389 N: ' 2008.08.24-'q; SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle ( Mice ✓ 11.0. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Cliambers Avonuc, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 i'lume (970):128-1790 ✓ Toll Frcc: (877),129-0,112 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1701 Page 8 or 8 WALL TYPE PER PLAN (D4-S SHOWN) MILLWORK (S.I.D) ON GYP BOARD ON FRAMING AS REQ. 1/2" GYP BD ON 1" SHAFTWALL LINER ON 1/2- GYP BD ON 3-5/8" METAL STUDS PER UL U529. PENETRATIONS SERVING RC UNITS R NIT PASSAGEWAY NOTE: FOR DOORS LOCATED IN MODIFIED PASSAGEWAY CONSTRUCTION PER THIS DETAIL, SEE 3/A9.1.01 SHAFTWALL PER PLAN 2-HR WALL C PASSAGEWAY SCALE: 1" - 1'-0° 20 AT RC UNIT PENETRATIONS TOWN'OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No...: 210107101016 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR LAYTON CONSTRUCTION CO 9090 S. SANDY PARKWAY SANDY 07/19/2006 INC 07/19/2006 UTAH 84040 License: 333-A APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS 07/19/2006 600 FOSHAY TOWER 821 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 License: C000001981 Permit # B06-0196 Project PRJ03-0468 Status . . . : ISSUED Applied..: 07/18/2006 Issued . 04/20/2009 Expires . 09/26/2007 Phone: (801) 568-9090 Phone: 612-332-1500 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Occupancy NIGHT CLUBS (A2) CHURCHES (A3) BUSINESS(B)& HMP (H5 EDUCATIONAL (E) INDUSTRIAL/MOD HAZ MERCANTILE (M) RESIDENTIAL/HOTELS RESIDENTIAL/MULTFAM( STORAGE/MOD HAZ (S1) STORAGE/LOW HAZ(S2) Type Factor Sq Feet Valuation ZONE 4 IB 299.08 27,353 $8,180,735.24 ZONE 4 IB 369.90 8,605 $3,182,989.50 ZONE 4 IB 300.40 31,130 $9,351,452.00 ZONE 4 IB 322.53 670 $216,095.10 ZONE 4 IB 183.77 29,600 $5,439,592.00 ZONE 4 IB 220.56 2,445 $539,269.20 ZONE 4 IB 302.22 86,991$26,290,420.02 ZONE 4 IB 250.22 133,695$33,453,162.90 ZONE 4 IB 169.75 23,080 $3,917,830.00 ZONE 4 IB 167.15 75,773$12,665,456.95 Totals 399,510$103,237,002.9* TOV Adjusted Valuation: 3,237,002.91 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $237,002.91 FEE SUMMARY Building > 378, 777.45 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees 157, 177. 90 Plan Check 378,777.45 Recreation Fee--------------> 399, 510 . 00 Additional Fees-----------> $8, 355. 00 Investigation-> $0. 00 TOTAL FEES > 157, 177.90 Total Permit Fee---------- > 165, 532.90 Will Call-----> $3.00 Payments > 165,532.90 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0.00 Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e-mailed to applicant. 12/18/2006 cdavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set for plan c by TOV 12/13/06. An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer. 03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR:1215- G&E permit approval only. Conditic 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only 06/12/2007 CDAVIS Action: PA Tower Crane footing pads. No additional fees assessed 07/16/2007 jplano Action: CR Additional work being requested to be adder phasing, correction letter sent. 08/01/2007 jplano Action: CR Second correction letter sent, insuffient supplied. 3) The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design profession architect and/or engineer. The design professionals are to verify that the additi( being requested is not in conflict with the corrections that are requested regard: building permit. All sheets are to be stamped and signed by the associated design professional. The architectural and the plumbing sheets have not been stamped. The stamp on the stri sheets has not been signed. The stamp on the electrical sheets has not been signet 4 There is insufficient detail to approve this submittal. Some examples are: a) There are several sections that are pertinent to this request that are not proN b) The elevator pit sections 10/S4.04, 18/S4.04, 19/S4.04, 20/S4.04 are missing. c) Ramp transition section 22/S6.01, 6/S6.01, 7/S4.04 are missing d) Exterior foundation wall connection to the matt slab 9/S6.01D, 27/S6.01, 6/S.0- 7/S6.01 e) Sump pit details 28/S4.04 and 29/S4.04 f) Column schedule, transition of the columns to slab? g) Slab steps 11/S6.01D. This review has stopped because of lack of information. 5 The Public Works Department in Vail has not approved the submittal for additionE be added to the phasing. Their approval will be necessary. 08/06/2007 jplano Action: PA Additional work approved for phasing. Under plumbing, underground electrical, rebar and concrete placement for elevator and si APPROVAL FOR MAT SLAB 09/11/2007 jplano Action: AP 10/22/2007 DPLACE Action: PA No charge. 10/22/2007 dplace Action: PA 11/13/2007 ependley Action: AP stamps. No added valuation. 11/15/2007 ependley Action: AP Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 11/30/2007 jplano Action: AP Full permit approved, see conditions REV 4 IR 5881: Approved shop drawings for REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAL REV5/IR6042. Approved shop drawings for de: Rev7/IR6058. Approved RFI-0237, No added vE Rev6/IR6057. Approved RFI-0221, No added vE .Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 12/18/2007 JPLANO Action: AP Rev9/IR6236. Approved shop drawings for po: slabs, no added valuation 12/26/2007 jplano Action: AP Rev10/IR6252. Approved changing a post ten: with thickened slab. $120.00 due 12/27/2007 MROYER Action: AP Revll/IR6266,6267. Rebar shop drawings rev: appropiate stamps, no charge 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA REV 12 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER LAYTON Si #05510-004 (EMBEDS @ LEVEL 1, 2, 3 ns 4) FROM JT STEEL NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA EV.13 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER SUBMITTAL (STUD RAILS, LEVELS 4 & 5) FROM SUNCOAST NO ADDTIONAL CHARGE 06/10/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev14,15,16, IR6685,6687,7744 are approved of plan review due, $720.00 07/08/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 19, IR 7989 are approved, Bulletins 10,25,29,31,35,40 - 8 hours of plan review due, $480.00 08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev17, IR 7777 are approved, Bulletins 023 swimming pool revisions, $360 due 08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 20, IR8245 are approved, storm and sewe connetions outside the building, public works has approved it. No charge from Safe 09/29/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev18, IR7988 are approved. The sub-duct s-, the dryers and range hoods are not approved. 46 hours of plan review due = $2760.( 12/04/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev22/IR9384 - This is the revised ADMOD t( wood above 401. This is to be approved by the tire department to be issued. No chi 12/18/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev23/IR9488, Additional tire-stopping subr approved, no charge 01/02/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev21/IR9008, Approved Bulletins 036, 037, 043, 044, 050, 051, 052, 055, 056 and firestopping submittal. 055, generator fueling needs fire department approval prior to issuance 056, deck extention needs DRB approval prior to issuance 29 hours of plan review due=$1740.00 02/09/2009 jplano Action: NA Rev24/IR9666 - Fire Alarm Plans to be apprc fire department 02/09/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev25/IR9587 - 113M Fire Resistive Wrap 15A' for HVAC ducting as shown on apporved plans. 2 hours of plan review Due=$120.00 02/10/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev26/IR9663 - Subduct system for resident: system approved. 8 hours of plan review due=$480.00 04/16/2009 jplano Action: CR Rev27, IR9840 - Bulletins 59-73, correctioi sent, revisions needed and full sized drawings for collation Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the H( Utility relocation permit request. The applicant shall remove only those trees wh: absolutely necessary for the utility relocation work. 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the al to dewater the site. 03/31/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning recieved a bond to cover the Grad: Excavation in the amount of 3.2 million. Planning has approved the grading and ex( permit. 06/25/2007 Warren Action: COND Planning has approved the tull building pej dated recieved on May 29, 2007, with a single condition. A complete Design Review will need to be submitted for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs the pool deck to West Meadow Drive. 08/20/2007 Warren Action: AP The set of plans provided to allow tro the some work prior to release of a tull building permit has been approved. The plans stamped July 26, 2007 •09/05/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning is approving the set of plans date 2007, with the condition that the applicant submits a revised landscaping plan to] approval prior to requesting a TCO. 11/02/2007 GRUTHER Action: AP REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAI 06/12/2008 Warren Action: AP The planning departmetn signs ott on Bullei 23A with one condition. The gate on teh new set of stairs shal be as the base of t on the pool deck not on the top of the stairs adjacent to Meadow Drive. 09/26/2008 Warren Action: CR Regarding the above permit my only comment need a detail of the gate at the top of the stairs serving as an exit trom the poc This detail shall be depict the desired gate which tits not only the aesthetics of Season but that of the Meadow Drive streetscape. The design should take into accoi for security trom the public side of the tence and be design with this in mind. Fc the Town does not want to see a nice gate submitted, approved, and installed and t of security reason we add a piece of plexi-glass to the gate as an atterthought. are dated 5-8-08 Bullentin #40. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding. Review: Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied: 1. Fire Dept staging on south side of the west end. The hydrant on the west side. Sheet A0.3.00 2. Sheet A0.3.05 does not show an acc, Fire Command Center. 3. The plans submitted by RJA are not 4. The plans show a dead end corridor project is shown on east end. The apporved end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on =_ptable route to the interior of the buildinc stamped and are labeled "Not for Constructic behind the front desk. 5. 12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is 91 Relocate electrical disconnect to site. Location as proposed on pla 03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: 07/11/2007 McGee Action: as submitted 7 11 07. 09/07/2007 McGee Action: the ri su PA AP AP AP trailer or provide ready access on southwest omitted 12/13/06 is not accepted. g and e permit is approved For G & E only Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3A approved for l: The full permit is approved as noted: Life Safety Report 5 22 07 1. LSR, MOU's, and Admin Mod's must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protect: of Record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-tunction and ballroom is not RJA alledgedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence ha: presented. 3. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans, is not accepted. 5. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additionz 12/08/2008 MAH Action: AP Rev21/IR9008 - This is the revised ADMOD fc wood above 401. This is to be approved by the fire department to be issued. No chi SB. PER VERBAL FROM MIKE VAUGHAN, OK TO APPROVE FOR FIRE. 02/25/2009 drhoades Action: AP Permanent location of FDC for South side of 03/26/2009 mcgee Action: AP Sub duct revisions 1 27 09 per RJA 1. Add clean out of lint traps to OEM manual for project. Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 10/20/2006 is Action: DN Awaiting for additional information 12/20/2006 is Action: PA Approval to allow grading and prep work foi installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for t access for small construction vehicles ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive. 03/26/2007 is Action: PA Staging plan for Phase 1 of the G&E permit only. Engineer approval for the G&E permit still required currently under review. staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only 08/07/2007 csaili Action: AP additional work proposed for phased permit no approval for mat slab 09/13/2007 csalli Action: DN waiting for executed MOU 10/04/2007 TK Action: AP Approved Building Permit with the condtion: the memo dated 8/5/07 from Chad Salli. 07/31/2008 csaili Action: AP revised sheets C17, C20 dated 7/18/08 and C18A, C19 dated 7/1/08 approved Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS Item: 05700 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that 1 have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS 1 A ANCE BY TELEPH E .4T 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. I SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit # B06-0196 as of 04-20-2009 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS J. BRINK 612-332-1500 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Conditions: Cond: CON0008815 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3/28/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 Applied: 07/18/2006 Issued: 04/20/2009 To Expire: 09/26/2007 The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the full building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original comment number for clarity. General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule" to prevent a room that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor". The Fire and Life Safety Report prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants. These will be required for full permit issuance. General: The Fire & Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved prior to the approval for full building permit. 3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units 3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is discharging. 8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C-414, is actually a horizontal portion of Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or remove the designation of passageway. 10) See the general comment above. 11) See the general comment above. 12) See the general comment above. 13) See the general comment above. 16) See the general comment above. 22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be tested in accordance with ASTME 119, tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire-resistance rating not less than the fire-resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the window when responding for full building permit. 23) See the general comment above. 39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures. Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly. This item has no impact on the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building permit issuance. 42) See response the comment number 39. 46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space is not accessory. 46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 210A as there is no access to stair Q. Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel. 49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved by the Town of Vail's Building Official. 57 through 61 and 149) The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed. Cond: I (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 1'4 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 17 (BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FRAMING INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED FOR. Cond: 35 (P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: 5 (PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPRINT SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC. Cond: CON0009095 The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review aplication for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs added from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive, within 30 days of the release of the building permit. Cond: CON0009121 The applicant shall submit a seperate Design Review application for review and approval for all signage design, locations, and materials prior to installation. Cond: CON0009294 The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan which addresses the landscaping conflicts created by the shallow soild depths on the culvert containing Spraddle Creek. This plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to requesting a certifcate of occupancy. Cond: CON0009330 SAFEbuilt Colorado Conditions of Approval To: Layton Construction Re: Full Building Permit Conditions of Approval The following conditions will be required to be addressed prior to construction. Sufficient time shall be granted for review, response and approval before work is initiated. Building Department- The items listed within the building department comments are numbered to correspond with the 3 round comment letter dated 08/21/2007. 46. Change the exiting from Vestibule 210A. It appears to exit through intervening room that is not accessory to the vestibule. HGA Response: We submit that the adjacent space is accessory. Vestibule 210A services mechanical rooms and the service elevators. To exit from Vestibule 210A the occupants have to pass through Vestibule 275A, which is basically for the spa staff, then through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area, then to hallway 279, then through exit passageway 293, then through exit passageway 297, then to exit discharge. The issue is that the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area is not accessory to the mechanical rooms. It is accessory for the rooms off Vestibule 275A for the staff of the spa but not the mechanical areas. Please change the layout accordingly. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Vestibule 210A is purely circulation space and does not carry an occupant load. This vestibule provides connection between the Spa and the service elevators, IDF Room 210, and Mechanical Room 257. Relative to egress, it provides the egress route for the one occupant from IDF 210 and the one occupant from Mechanical 257 (as shown on A0.3.02). IDF 210, Mechanical 257, Vestibule 210A, and Service Elevator Lobby E-202 are considered to be part of the overall Spa as they serve Spa functions. The service elevators stop at this location solely to provide connection to the Spa. IDF 210 houses audio-visual, telephone, and data system equipment that specifically serves the Spa and must be accessed by Spa personnel. Similarly, Mechanical 257 houses the equipment serving the pools within Room 255 and must be accessed by Spa staff. In summary, we submit that all these spaces are part of the overall Spa and are "accessory" to each other. Therefore, current layout provides egress that complies with IBC 1013.2 as the spaces are accessory, are not hazard occupancies, and provide a discernible path of travel to an exit. This comment is in reference to the electrical room #212. Please revise 64. A2.03.1 - Wall tag both shafts located in room 304 (storage room). Wall tags must reference an approved assembly from the partition schedule. HGA Response: Wall tag has been added. One shaft in room 304 does not have wall tags. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The drawing has been updated to include wall tags for this shaft. Still have one shaft not tagged Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. 152. Provide accessible parking spaces per IBC Table 1106.1. Providing 212 spaces would require 7 to be accessible, 2 of those to be van accessible. Verify 98" of vertical clearance for the van spots. HGA Response: We submit that the number of accessible parking stalls complies with IBC Table 1106.1 and section 1106.5. The hotel is operating on 100% valet parking stalls, with an additional 59 self-park stalls for fractional ownership, full ownership, and employee. Per Table 1106.1, 3 stalls are required for the self-parking, and at least one of the three is required to be van accessible. Plan sheet A0.3.01 indicates there are 228 parking spaces. Spaces marked for Valet parking number 78. With those counts, Table 1106.1.3 would require 5 accessible spaces with one van accessible space. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Per previous response, most of the parking spaces are valet only. There are 59 self-park stalls that will be allocated to fractional ownership, full ownership condos, and employees. The drawings have been updated to identify each space as either valet or self-park. We submit that only the 59 self-park stalls are considered per Table 1106.1 and that the number of accessible spaces required are provided. Deducting the 78 Valet parking from the total spaces, you are still required to add two additional accessible spaces for a total number of 5 accessible spaces. 155. All the massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. Please amend the toilet facilities, changing rooms, lavatories, tubs and the showers meet to accessibility requirements of the ANSI A117.1-98. (IBC 1109.14.3) HGA Response: We submit the Wet Massage Suite #289 complies with the accessibility requirements of ANSI A117.1-98 (IBC 1109.14.3). All massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We disagree that IBC 11 09.14.3 requires that ALL spa treatment rooms be accessible. IBC 1109.14 pertains to "recreational facilities". If the Spa is going to be considered a "recreational facility" then it should be considered as a whole. As such, the Spa is accessible - it provides accessibility at the entry/reception, locker rooms, toilets, showers, whirlpools, lounges, treatment rooms, etc. We submit that nothing requires ALL treatment rooms to be accessible any more than ALL lockers, ALL toilets, or ALL showers. Add grab bars at the tub in room 289 for accessibility. 167. We are unable to locate a designated accessible Type "A" condominium per Section 11 07.6.2 of the 2003 IBC. As the condominiums are a different type of R-2 occupancy from the time-share units, an accessible Type "A" condominium is required. HGA Response: Since only 16 condominiums are proposed, no Type "A" units are required. Refer to IBC 1107.6.2.1.1. With the condominiums, employee housing and timeshare units there are a total of 63 units classified as an R-2 occupancy group. Per Section 1107.6.2.1.1 Type A units shall be dispersed among the various classes of units. Therefore a Type A accessible unit is required in each of the following groups: the condominiums, the employee housing, and the timeshare units. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): To resolve this issue we have revised Condo #8 (on Level 9, sheet A4.28.1)) to be a "Type A" unit per ICC/ANSI A117.L Two accessible employee housing units and one accessible timeshare unit are already provided and indicated on the drawings. Comment 169-180 - Submit a Memorandum of Understanding to the Town of Vail for approval by the Building Official to reference the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1. If accepted by the town, please revise entire plan to comply with the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1 in its entirety, If not accepted please revise plans per 1998 ANSI A-117.1 and comments above. 169. In the accessible units in the guest rooms of the R-1 occupancy, all bathing & toilet facilities are required to be accessible per Chapter 6 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: We submit that the accessible units include the accessible bathing and toilet facilities and comply with Chapter 6 of ANSI A 117.1. Plan sheet A4.07. I A and A4.07.1 B for Unit PR-HC shows a raised platform in media room # 116 which does not have an accessible route. Also, bathrooms/rooms # 103, # 108, # 109, # 1 10, # 133 do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The raised platform within Media 1 16 is intended to provide tiered seating within this "home theater". We submit that an accessible route is not required for this small platform as it is less than 25% of the overall room and the remainder of the room is accessible. While this room is not an "assembly" space, we submit that IBC 1108.2.4. 1, exception 2 provides guidance regarding this room. See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.06.1 for Unit 2KK-HC has bathrooms/rooms # 103, # 108 which do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.05.3 for Unit IK-HC has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.04AA for Unit ES2-HC has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.01.1 for Unit K1-H1 has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Unit type K1-HI is a unit for the hearing impaired. It is not an accessible unit. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We submit that only one accessible bathroom is required within an accessible hotel unit. This requirement is consistent with the federal standard - ADAAG Chapter 9. To interpret IBC Chapter 11 as requiring that ALL bathrooms must be accessible is to raise the standard beyond the federal requirements. We submit that this is not reasonable, does not reflect industry standard, and is not the intent of the IBC / ICC. Rather, we submit that the IBC / ICC intends to coordinate and correlate with the federal standards. As an example, we can examine the accessibility requirements for condominiums. The federal standard is the FHA Fair Housing Design Manual. This document allows condo units to be provided with one "Specification B" bathroom and that is the highest level of accessibility. Similarly, the 2003 edition of ICC / ANSI A117.1 has been revised to better correlate to FHA and require that "Type A" units provide "at least one" accessible bathroom . The common thread is the requirement is for one or "at least one" accessible bathroom - not all. Since the ADAAG, FHA Design Manual, and A117 (2003) all require one or "at least one" accessible bathroom it is reasonable to interpret the IBC's requirements in the same manner. Otherwise, all the hotel units would be held to a higher standard than the condominium units within the same building. 170. In Type "A" dwelling units of the R-2 occupancies, all toilet and bathing facilities must comply with Sections 1002.11.1 through 1002.1 1.7 of ANSI A] 17.1. Some Type "A" dwelling units have bathrooms which do not comply. Please clarify. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment 4167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We request that ICC/ANSI Al 17.1 - 2003 be used as the applicable edition relative to the "Type A" condominium. This is the most recent version of A] 17 and our research has found that the various revisions in Chapter 10 were intended to correct the intent of various provisions and to better coordinate with federal requirements (FHA and ADA). Per 1003.1 1.1 of the Al 17-2003, at least one bathroom is required to comply with 1003.11. This correlates with FHA requirements ("Specification B" bathrooms) and Chapter 9 of the ADA. Therefore, we submit that the latest intent of the various codes and standards is that at least one bathroom, but not all, is required to comply with 1003.11. 171. In'Type "A" dwelling units, a permanent seat is required at the head end of the bathtub per Section 607 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): ICC/ANSI A117.1 - 1998, 607.3 states that a permanent seat OR a removable in-tub seat shall be provided. However, 1002.1 1.6, exception 1, states that the removable in-tub seat required by 607.3 is NOT required. Since 607.3 gives the option of either permanent or removable seats, we submit that the true intent of 1002.11.6, exception 1 is to NOT require either type of seat. ICC / ANSI Al 17.1 - 2003 carries similar language, but also includes Figure 1003.11.8 (a) to clarify that the seat (permanent or removable) can be omitted. 172. In Type "A" dwelling units, clearance in front of bathtubs shall extend the length of the bathtub and shall be 30 inches wide minimum per Section 607 of ANSI A 117.1. Some of the bathtubs have lavatories encroaching into the required clearances. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required bathtub clear floor area is indicated. 173. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.11.1 of ANSI A 117. 1, doors shall not swing into the clear floor or ground space or clearance for any fixture, unless a clear floor space of 30 inches minimum by 48 inches minimum is located beyond the arc of the door swing. There are water closet compartments and some other bathroom areas that do not meet those requirements. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. The door swings do not swing into the other clear floor spaces. 174. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.13 of ANSI A117.1, where operable windows are provided, at least one window in each sleeping, living, or dining space shall have operable parts complying with Section 1002.13 of ANSI A 117.1. All windows of "accessible units" shall comply with Section 309 of ANSI A117.1, Operable Parts. Provide documentation showing compliance. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. A note has been added to indicate requirement that all operable windows (and sliding doors) comply with 1002.13. 175. For Type "A" and "accessible units", provide details showing accessibility compliance for the operable parts of the showers, lavatory height, lavatory knee and toe clearance, and bathroom mirror height per Section 1002.11 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to interior elevations shown within the Interior Design drawings. I am unable to locate the Interior Design Drawings in the plan set submitted. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to accessibility details illustrated on sheet A0.4.3. 180. For Type "A" dwelling units, provide details showing accessibility compliance for kitchen work surfaces, sinks, range controls, and refrigerator/freezer requirements per Section 1002.12 of ANSI Al 17.1'. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required kitchen features are illustrated. 183. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the condominiums, some "U" shaped kitchens do not have the required 60 inch minimum clearance between opposing base cabinets per Section 1003.12 of ANSI AI 17.1. HGA Response: Sheets A4.22.1, A4.25.1, and A4.30.1 have been revised to provide 60" clearance at U-shaped kitchens. Provide corrected plan sheets. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These sheets are included in the 7/18/07 resubmittal set. 185. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the time share units, the water closets do not have required clearances and some doors encroach required clearances per Section 1003.11.2 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Refer to the response to comment # 186 below. As such, there are no Type "B" timeshare units. See response to comment # 186. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to response to comment # 186. 186. Is Option "A" being used for the bathroom fixtures in the Type "B", Time-share units? If so, each fixture is required to meet the requirements of the option per Section 1003.1 1.3.1 of ANSI A] 17. 1. Please clarify. HGA Response: As previously discussed and resolved, the timeshare units are transient occupancy (similar to hotel units) and not residences. As such, one accessible timeshare unit is provided per IBC Table 1107.6.1.1. This accessible unit is #3103 located on Level 03. The enlarged plan for this accessible unit is on sheet A4.12.1 A and the associated H/C bathroom in 2/A4.12.2A. Provide signed letters from persons representing the operating authority for this facility stating that the timeshare units will not be used as residences. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These letters will be submitted by ownership 203. Enclose both mechanical rooms on the 9th level in 2 hour rated construction, it appears that the 2 hour shafts from below terminate in these rooms. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet M4.06 (Part Plan Attachment No. M06). The Area 3A mechanical room is unrated, and the 2 hour rated vertical risers through the building through the 8th floor slab. In order to avoid the installation of inaccessible fire dampers at the top of the riser, RYBKA have revised sheet M4.06 to ductwork is to be fire rated in the attic space. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. The Area 3B mechanical room is a 2 hour rated room that ends at column line A 14. The ductwork that extends to the south across column line A] 4 is 2 hour fire rated to avoid the installation of fire dampers in inaccessible locations. Fire dampers are shown in the penetrations of the two hour rated Area 3B mechanical room, where ductwork exist the mechanical room. A) The mechanical room on the 9th level over "AREA-03A"has not been addressed on the plan sheets. The partial ninth floor plan on 8 ''/z" x 1 1 " indicate wrapping ducts. If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. Ductwork is to be wrapped to provide 2 hour fire rating in attic space. (Refer to Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03). Provide architectural details rated enclosure. B) In the mechanical room labeled 911 the rated walls do not appear to enclose the room entirely. The wall is labeled 30 minutes on the north end and the wall is labeled 1 hour where Trash 912 (above "AREA-0313") is located on sheet A0.3.09. There are 3 duct penetrations in this area to be addressed, 28x 10 S/E F/B, 24x 18 G/e F/B and 24x 14 S/A F/A T/B. Rybka Response: Refer to Architectural Sheet A0.3.09 where Mechanical Room 911 is to be provided with 2 hour rating. Three ducts identified enter riser shaft from Mechanical Room 911 and riser is considered to be connected to and form part of mechanical room and so no fire smoke damper is provided. The ducts in question enter a shaft in the floor below within Maid Room G-71 1. Fire/Smoke Dampers are required where these ducts enter the shaft. One duct is not in a shaft. Please address accordingly. C) How will the 2 hour shaft assembly be maintained at EF-14 and EF-30? If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be rated for operation within rated enclosures by fan manufacturer or are to be relocated within Mechanical Room 911. Provide architectural details for the shafts. 214. Add a fire/smoke damper to the penetration by the 8x6 duct that penetrates the 30 minute fire partition on page M2.08.1 on grid line 11 and between A9 and A 10. Rybka Response: Fire dampers are not required in one hour rated fire barriers per IMC 607.5.2. (Refer to Response No. 208.) This is not a fire barrier; it is a fire partition defining a rated corridor. A fire/smoke damper is required for this duct. Rybka Response: Combination fire smoke damper is provided where this duct exits the rated shaft. The response indicates an f/s damper has been added to the duct as exits the rated shaft. A smoke damper is required where it penetrates the rated corridor. 215. Fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Rybka Response: Mechanical floor plan sheets, sheets M2.01.1 thru M2.11.1 have been revised to show: " Combination fire smoke dampers (FSD) or shunt duct* on rated shaft penetrations. FD in duct floor penetrations when no more than three floors are penetrated, and FD on 2 hour rated wall penetrations. * shunt ducts per NFPA 90A (2002), Figure A.5.3. NFPA 90A is not an adopted document by the Town of Vail or referenced in the IMC. The review team is not familiar with the term "shunt duct". Fire smoke dampers are required at the shaft and corridor duct penetrations. (IMC 607.5.3, 607.5.4 and 607.5.5.1) Rybka Response: The 2006 IMC now calls the use of 22" upturned sheet metal ducts in 2 hour fire rated risers as 'sub ducts'. The provision of the 'sub duct' is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. The use of sub ducts on the project is shown in Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03. M2.03.1 - Remove designations for shunt ducts for the ducts run in the garage exhaust shaft. Rybka Response: EF-8, EF-43 and residential dryer exhaust have been shown terminating in a vertical areaway (garage exhaust riser) that is always being exhausted by EF-1 B on emergency power. It was agreed during the June TOV plan review meeting that this condition is analogous to the 'sub duct' provisions identified earlier. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 2. In Group B and R occupancies equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 of the International Building Code, smoke dampers are not required at penetrations of shafts where kitchen, clothes, dryer, bathroom and toilet room exhaust openings with steel exhaust subducts, having a wall thickness of at least 0.019 inch (0.48 mm) extend at least 22 inches (559 mm) vertically and the exhaust fan at the upper terminus is powered continuously in accordance with the provisions of Section 909.11 of the International Building Code, and maintains airflow upward to the outdoors. The drawings are still substantially incomplete when labeling FSD's. I will attempt to identify some locations. It will be up to the design team to identify all locations. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts exit rated shafts. All drawings are indicting F.D. on the bathroom exhausts where penetrating the shaft. There is an administrative modification request to eliminate dampers on the bathroom exhausts. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FD designations at restroom exhausts have been deleted where 'sub-ducts' are provided per the administrative modification. The drawings are indicating ducts from below and ducts from above. Please create a tag for sub-ducts and clearly mark the plans on all the ducts that are to be utilizing this system. M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-301 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 2-8x6 ducts and 1-10x6 duct. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-311 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 1-8x10 duct and 1-12x6. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-301 and C-311 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - All duct penetrations through the shafts are marked F.D. These are required to be FSD. There are too many to list individually. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts penetrate rated shafts. There are multiple places that indicate FSD's where an administrative modification has been requested to utilize a 22" sub-duct. Please coordinate. M2.04.1 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-401 and C-41 1 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.04.1 - There is a 14x10 duct supplying corridor C-411 missing a damper designation. The duct is near A9.9 and 11/11.4. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. This duct has changed size to 12x8 since last review. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) These are just a few of the un-complying damper designations, stopped review on this correction. Again, fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Reconfiguration is still necessary. 216. Ductwork, pipes and electrical are prohibited in an exit passageways unless serving the exit passageway. It appears that above non-rated ceilings in the exit passageways the space is being used as a plenum and contains construction elements not allowed, please address all exit passageways. Rybka Response: Mechanical services not associated with exit passageways have been relocated. The review team's interpretation of IBC 1020.5 is that any ductwork serving an exit passageway shall be a completely separate system from the rest of the building and separate from all other passageways. Also, this system is required for pressurization. 1020.5 Penetrations. Penetrations into and openings through an exit passageway are prohibited except for required exit doors, equipment and ductwork necessary for independent pressurization, sprinkler piping, standpipes, electrical raceway for fire department communication and electrical raceway serving the exit passageway and terminating at a steel box not exceeding 16 square inches (0.010 m2). Such penetrations shall be protected in accordance with Section 712. There shall be no penetrations or communicating openings, whether protected or not, between adjacent exit passageways. Rybka Response: It is our understanding that only portions of the building service systems that serve the exit enclosure are allowed to penetrate the exit enclosure. We note that IBC 1019.1.3, VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURE, VENTILATION, Item .2 permits HVAC equipment (FCUs) to be located in the exit enclosure: 10 19.1.3 Ventilation. Equipment and ductwork for exit enclosure ventilation shall ....where located within the building, be separated from the remainder of the building, including other mechanical equipment, with construction as required for shafts. All ductwork serving the exit passageways shall be protected at the point of penetration of the passageway with a fire/smoke damper. The passageway is an extension of the vertical exit enclosure that it serves and lesser protection is not allowed. (1017.1) Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, and have provided FSD where make-up air ductwork penetrates the exit enclosure. M2.03.1- There is a duct termination shown in Stair Q exit enclosure, labeled "16x12 Employee Dryer T/A". This is not allowed in an exit enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been revised to show routing of dryer exhaust so that it does not pass through Stair Q. M2.04.1 - There is an 8x6 duct penetration within the exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.04.1 - There is a transfer opening 24x4 within exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization; this transfer opening is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.05:3 - There is a 6" duct shown penetrating Stair N exit enclosure. Please move out of the enclosure. (IBC 1019.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.05.3 has been revised and ductwork has been rerouted so as not to pass through Stair N. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-601 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the elevator lobby and maid's room. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-601. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 3.3/4 and A11. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - There is a duct penetration between Exit Passageway C-601 and Stair S-601. Penetrations are not allowed. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-611 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-611 is not deliberate and is to be deleted. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 and a 12x6 duct passing through Exit Passageway C-61 1. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. Grid lines 11/11.4 and A8.2/A9.9. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There is a 20x10 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-611. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 133B4.3 and BC/BD. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.2 - There is a 12x10 duct penetrating the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that Stair S-605 is connected to exit passageway C-614. and that the 'unlabeled passageway' is rated 2 hours, this upper level of the hallway is rated to provide separation between levels 4 and 5 and this portion of the ceiling space does connect to a rated vertical exit enclosure, the hallway is not an exit passageway, and that 1020.5 does not apply. M2.06.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: See previous comment. M2.07.2 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-717 are not intended to function as returns, are to be shown 'blanked-off and are provided for aesthetic reasons only. M2.07.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.3 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.08.1 and M2.08.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-803. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. Penetrations are not allowed fire wrapped or not. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. These comments are still outstanding. Tim Willings P.E. with Rybka met with the plans examiner on 8/14/07 to bring updated drawings addressing these corrections. It was advised to submit the drawings when all other comments are addressed. 222. Please address the garage exhaust on the east side of the structure that will cause a nuisance thru the casement windows (W 102) in rooms 5318, 6318 and 7318. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet A2.05.2 for plan location, and sheet A0.7.2 (W 102) for window type. Architect to revise window to be fixed type. HGA Response: The architectural documents have been revised to provide fixed windows at these three locations. The architectural drawings are indicating windows W 102. This window is casement not fixed on sheet A0.7.2. Please coordinate. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Revised drawings indicating fixed windows at these locations are included with this resubmittal. Since this review, the Town of Vail has informed our review team that garage exhausts on the CO2 detectors are product-conveying outlets requiring being 10' above grade, 10' from openings into the building and 10' from property lines. The continuous fan is considered environmental, thus allowing 3' from openings and 3' from property lines. Please address accordingly. 224. Please indicate how the 18" flue from the gas ironer, on the 3rd level is routed thru the loading dock above on the 4th level. Rybka Response: Laundry gas-fired flat ironer vent leaves the laundry room at level 3 (Sheet M2.03.1) and runs vertically through the building in a rated chase with fire enclosed offsets before being vented at the roof of level 1 1 (Sheet M2.11.1). M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Provide architectural details for the shaft. 228. Specify on the plans the location of EC-1, Type I fan for the kitchen. Rybka Response: Sheet M4.04 has been revised to show Ecology Unit EC-1 in Ecology Room M-402A. Ecology Room M-402A as designed is a component of the grease duct enclosure. "The duct enclosure shall serve a single grease exhaust duct system and shall not contain any other ducts, piping, wiring or systems." Remove the other exhaust fans, ducting and electrical within the room not associated with the Type 1 duct. (IMC 506.3.10) Rybka Response: The 2 hour rated architectural enclosure of the Ecology unit has been reconfigured to that only the ductwork and equipment associated with the commercial kitchen exhaust is contained within the Ecology Room M-402A. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour wall and 90 minute door that is shown on the mechanical drawings. 233. Indicate on the plans that the 36" dryer duct and the 18" flue from the Ironer are in a 2 hour shaft on the 6th level, page M2.06.1. Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, the 36" dryer exhaust duct and 18" gas-fired flat ironer vent that both run horizontally at level 6 (on sheet M2.06. I) are to be in a 2-hr fire rated enclosure. M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. (from comment 224) Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour shaft walls and details for construction. Please show compliance to IBC 707.11 for the bottom of the shaft housing the 34" dryer duct. 234. Provide manufacturers instructions to verify the dryers in rooms 312 and 31 OD are capable of exhausting the developed length shown on the plans. Rybka Response: Residential dryer exhaust system shown on Sheet M2.03.1 serving Employee Laundry Room 31 OD and Valet Room 317, with quantity five (4+1) dryer exhaust connections to dryer exhaust EF-43 has been rerouted. In addition to the lint filter integral to the appliance, and auxiliary lint trap and cleanout has been shown on the common dryer exhaust duct system before the duct leaves the Employee Laundry Room 31 OD. The entire length of the residential dryer exhaust duct is to be fire wrapped to maintain clearances to combustibles. Discharge of laundry dryer exhaust is routed to exterior via connection to rated garage exhaust riser. Penetration is protected by fire wrap and minimum 22" shunt duct extended into garage exhaust riser. In addition, RYBKA have specified a laundry exhaust booster fan EF-43 which is interlocked with dryer operation. Dryer exhaust ducts are required to terminate to the outside the building and shall be equipped with a back draft damper, also clothes dryer exhaust ducts shall not extend into or through ducts or plenums. Route the dryer ducts directly to the exterior with a back draft damper. (IMC 504.4) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by showing the backdraft damper. The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 238. The Laundry Layout, page LA1.2, indicates a flue pipe for the dry cleaner in room #317. Add the flue and the 2 hour chase to the architectural sheets and to the mechanical sheets, clarify that it does not pass through a plenum. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.03.1 to show dry cleaning machine exhaust fan EF-8 and ducted connection to outdoors. M2.03.1 - The termination is shown with a 22" sub-duct within the garage exhaust duct. This is not to the exterior as required per IMC 502.7.3.6. The review team also is concerned that when the garage exhaust is not operating the fumes from the dry cleaning can migrate to the garage. Terminate the dry cleaning exhaust to the exterior. Rybka Response: The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 244. Add a 2 hour shaft below and proper opening protection for the duct designated as 24x 14 S/A F/A-24x12 S/A T/B on page M2.08.1 on grid line l0A and between 10.5/11. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1 and relocated the duct riser to the protected shaft in the North West corner of the Maids Room G-811. See comment 4215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by properly coordinating the duct offset/riser transfer shown at this level with rated shaft location or rating requirements. These two ducts that transition between shafts that are not aligned between the 8th and 9th floor levels are both to be shown enclosed in a 2 hour rated drywall enclosure, negating the need for combination fire smoke dampers, except where duct connections penetrate the shaft wall (one location). The duct on this level is indicating 24x14 S/A(supply air) F/A(from above). The 9th floor level or the enlarged M4.06 does not show this duct. Please clarify. 245. Add a 2 hour shaft or designate a fire damper for the 28x10 and the 28x14 as it passes through a 2 hour floor/ceiling assembly into the mechanical room above. On page M2.08.1 between grid lines 10.5 /11 and A8.2/A9.9. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that ducts that rise vertically through the building that are protected with two hour fire rated enclosures and are connected to a 2 hour rated mechanical room at the highest level do not have a fire damper at the floor penetration of the mechanical room. Rybka submits that the 2 hour rated shaft enclosure is an extension of the 2 hour rating of the mechanical room fire rated enclosure. There is a 24x10 duct shown penetrating the shaft connecting to the 28x10 duct within the shaft. Add the S/F damper at this location. (The architectural overlays indicate a shaft too small to house the duct?) There is a 24x18 duct shown in this vicinity penetrating the floor/ceiling above. Please address with a fire damper. 246. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 8x10 duct on page M2.07.2 between grid lines A8.2/A9.9 and 10110.5. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1. The duct has not been addressed on all levels also see comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by coordinating the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7, 8, 9 and 10 and attic levels (Sheets M2.07.2, M2.08.2, M2.09.2, M2.10.2 and M2.11.1). Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft wall (one location each occupied floor). The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands, the duct in question has been changed to 12x18 on the 7th level. 247. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 12x6 duct on page M2.07.1 between grid lines A6/A7 and on grid line 4.2. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1, M2.08.1, M209.1. This duct serving the elevator lobbies has not been addressed. Rybka Response: Rybka will coordinate the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7 in this location with level above and below. Rybka will correct this by rerouting existing ductwork through rated risers provided by HGA in these locations and Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft . The same issde as response to 4246. The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands. The supply duct from level 11 to 10 has no shaft, the duct runs horizontally on the 9th level with no shaft and runs to the 7th level with fire dampers at the floors of the 8th and 9th. This duct requires a shaft. 264. Fire dampers and rated shafts for ductwork through floor/ceiling assemblies are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Refer to response to comment 215 Here are some floor penetrations by ducts that have not been addressed, please evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. M2.03.1 - 12x20 duct, grid lines A4.6 and 2.7/3 The duct in question has changed to 20x16. The vertical and horizontal shafts need to be shown on the architectural sheets. M2.03.1 - 18x14 duct, grid lines A12 and 3.3/4 The horizontal shaft shown on M2.02.1 is not shown on the architectural sheets. M2.04.1 - 16x 10 duct, grid lines A 13 and 3.3/4 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.04 - 12x6 duct, grid lines A10/A1 I and 10.5/11 A fire damper has been added to the 2 floors above. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. M2.04 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10/Al 1 and 10.5111 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. The duct is connecting more than 2 stories below the shaft. M2.04 - 6x12 duct, grid lines A10 and 10.5 The drawings have been changed to add fire dampers at the floor line. This duct connects more than 2 stories, a shaft is required. M2.05 - 26x14 R/A, grid lines A6/A7 and 5 A fire damper is required at the floor between the 5th and 6th level. M2.05 - 12x12 paint shop exhaust, 12x12 carpenter exhaust and a 24x12 sanitary duct, grid lines A4.6 and 4/5. These ducts traverse from what appears to be a rated shaft from below through the Resid. Club Concierge Desk (512) room up through the ceiling with no protection. This duct enters a shaft on this level, add a fire damper to the duct as it enters the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.05 - 6x6, 8x6, (2)12x6 and 10x20 ducts, grid lines A10 and 10/10.5 M2.05 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10 and 10.5111 Review on duct penetrations through the floors has been stopped. The plans examiner's function is not to make a punch list for the design team. Evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that fire dampers, rated shafts and combination fire smoke dampers have been added to the floor plans in general conformance with requirements of the plan reviewer. Additional damper, combination fir dampers and shaft wall construction will be required where this drawing revision has not correctly identified that they are required. Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. Structural Conditions- The conditions listed are taken from the last comment letter dated 07/18/2007. The open issues are listed in Red. S106 F 9,11,14/S6.01 E Sheet 52.03.2: 12 ft. cantilever retaining wall extension of exterior two span wall below, outside of ballroom areaway on line Al l between 14 and 14.5 has not been checked and appears to be overstressed for flexure, please check. Consider moment resisting joints at slab to wall connections. Design / detail planter wall. These details require rebar and splices to be shown for proper detailing and construction. Verify cantilever deflection. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. silo F S2.02.4 No calculations have been provided for the cantilevered retaining wall around the pool structure, or on gridline D1. Verify lateral load capacity, consider pedestrian surcharge and water surcharge due to site drains behind this wall as appropriate. Verify footing width. KL&A 6/26/07: Wall in question between gridlines 6-8.5 south of A] 8 supports roof loads and also is the lateral load path for pool structure loading, and for roof uplift for partially enclosed structures. Wall also is monolithic with Area 3A perimeter building wall. Design is part of EOR's scope, please provide wall designs accounting for support of roof structure. KL&A 8/31/07: Coordinate new retaining wall detail 21/S4.03 with foundations shown on plan, S2.02.4. Verify new steel roof around pool structure will resist lateral soil reaction of 1.0 klf, verify metal deck shear strength and connection to resisting perpendicular retaining walls. S128 GS S2.09.3 Top slab bars l OT3 & l OT6 are shown at line 10.6/A 14. It seems these bars are shown in error as the concrete beam is upturned at this location. Beams south of line A12.2 are not identified. Please check. IBC 1603.1. details are required. KL&A 6/26/07: Top bars also appear required at gridline A10. S2.09.3 PT profile is incomplete, KL&A 8/31/07: Top bars are still not shown on plan, please review. S145 LS 1 /S3.02C Wall thickness is shown as 8 inches. Plan S201.2 indicates a 12" exterior foundation wall, please coordinate. KL&A 6/26/07: Coordinate reinforcing shown on shear wall elevation with 'W2' or'W3' per S2.01.2, it is unclear which wall type controls for soil lateral loading. Wall must span two way due to stair shaft opening, verify designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S164 LS S2.11 Provide detail of roof diaphragm to concrete cores. Provide or indicate detail of steel beams to concrete cores for gravity plus lateral loading, per ASCE 7-02 load combinations. Verify drag loads and chord force detailing at eave framing. Verify diaphragm welding is sufficient for expected shear forces, provide shear and moment diagram at roof deck levels. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7. KL&A 6/26/07: New detail 13/S 1.0.513: Welded studs, thickness and dimensions of embed plate are not defined. Please provide this information for all beams and reaction conditions on the drawings. Verify connection is adequate with short slot or long slot holes in the shear tab, if permitted for erection. Provide roof diaphragm calculations per original comment. IBC 1911, 1912, 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S165 LS 52.1 I Provide detail of concrete diaphragm to concrete cores, verify shear transfer at each level and comment whether any drags are required. Verify if typical details 12 & 23/S1.0.3A apply throughout the job. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. 5169 LS S3.02A Calculations show a significant force reversal / back-stay effect from Level 6 to Level 5 shear force, i.e. SW 14 & SW 16. Verify this load path has been designed for the loads per 3D analysis. Verify soil plus wind / seismic loading has been used for drag design. Note per plan, S2.05.1, a large hole exists adjacent to wall SW 16, and per calculations page 536,(38+57)=95k shear transfer is required. No drags are shown on plan. Please verify. Note, elevations S3.02A show 95 @ 14" o.c. at upper levels, calculations shown (2) #5 @ 24" o.c., please verify designs match calculations. IBC 1616.1.1, IBC 1604.4. KL&A 6/26/07: Original comment calculated (38+57)=95k load for SW 14 not SW 16 as noted, however collector bars have not been added for SW 14. SW 16 collector load is (86+143)=229k, (4) #7 shown on plan are not adequate for 229k, please review all collector designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S171 S2.11.1-2, etc. Roof framing plans are incomplete. Please address the following and confirm detailing will be provided in future drawings issues, per IBC 1604.2, 2205.1. a) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed b) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed c) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed d) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed e) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed f) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed g) W8 & W16 eave supports do not cantilever outwards and support eave in RAM analysis submitted, instead all load is transferred directly to columns via eave rim beam. Verify eave supports and perimeter girders are adequately sized KL&A 8/31 /07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. h) S2.09.3, etc: HSS6x6 to W8, W 14 moment connection at eave needs a detail KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. i) 1/S2.10.3: W1 6x31 on line A10.5 is shown as WI 8x35 per calculations, please verify all beams match calculations. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S172 I /S2.08.3 W 18x46 eave support girder near gridlines CB-C 1 is shown as W21 x44 per calculations; W 1400 on line BE is shown as W21 x48 per calculations. Several cantilevered eave moment connection supports are shown without a backspan member. Please review. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 1/S2.08.3 Verify lateral support of the low roof structure for wind and seismic loading; low roof section is not connected to Level 8 PT slab beyond or core walls within the roof area, and braced frames are not shown. Similar at 2/S2.08.3 and other low roof structures. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 11,26,28/S7.OIA Calculations indicate that roof deck is attached to slab edge along line 2 and other locations where deck and floor slab are near the same elevation. Provide a detail for lateral roof to slab connection where required by lateral analysis. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S174 S2.11.1, etc Show roof diaphragm to concrete core connection, consider in-plane collector shear forces and out of plane anchorage forces. IBC 1604.8.2; ASCE 7, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S175 S2.11.1 Verify diaphragm continuity at dormers line A5 between upper roof deck and lower roof deck, provide collectors as required for in plane shear and out of plane shear. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S176 S2.09.2 Roof ridge support columns nearI 5.5-A4.8 shown on S2.11.2 are not supported by slab below, please check. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Column in question is 20 feet tall, verify HSS5x5 is adequate, per 52.11.2. S178 A2.1 1.1 R, etc. Structural roof plans do not incorporate snow fences shown on architectural drawings. Please provide snow fence with adequate structural connection shear and moment associated with sliding snow. IBC 1608. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. KL&A 8/31/07: COMMENTS ON NEW DETAILS FOLLOW S187 21/S4.03 Minimum depth shall be 48" for frost depth requirement. IBC 1805.2.1. Verify wall vertical rebar is adequately developed at top of footing, ACl 318, 12.2. Appears that variables D and D' are reversed with calculations variables hf and hp, please review. IBC 1806. S188 S5.03 Revised beams 4138 & 4139 appear too shallow to support one way slab at ramp. Shear ties are spaced greater than d/2. Please review beam sizes for ramp loads. IBC 1604.2. Planning Department Conditions- From: Warren Cambell Submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval prior to requesting a TCO. Public Works Conditions- From: Chad Salli, Project Engineer 1. Install snowmelt in loading dock dwy. Sheet M5.15 not in resubmittal package, Sheet M5.14 shows heat in the southern half of the dwy. The dwy should be heated from the back of pan along the Frontage Rd to the trench drain. 2. The fountain entry feature shall not be public right-of-way, please remove from right-of-way. 3. The two tier retaining wall shall be designed/stamped by a Colorado registered professional engineer, greater than 4' in height from the top of wall to the bottom of the foundation. 4. Provide Final Drainage report including hydrology and hydraulic analyses (Box culvert, Storm pipe, inlets, swales, etc...). This shall include storm sewer profiles with HGL shown. A 100 yr analysis shall be completed showing no private/public property damage as a result. Provide capacity analysis for major swales and all inlets. The SCS method may be used for large mountain basins, the Rational method shall be used for the smaller site and developed basins. 5. A Developer Improvement Agreement will be required prior to release of permit. 6. Show proposed location for Comcast fiber line along the west property line. Frontage Road/Vail Road 1. Town of Vail Street lights shall be placed at 50' spacings along the project limits. Coordinate with TOV electricians for electric meter location. Relocate private lighting to private property. 2. Set back (detach) the frontage rd sidewalk 6' from back of curb east of the porte cochere exit. Sod shall be installed between the curb and walk. 3. Use attached sidewalk detail for sidewalks located within the right-of-way. 4. Use TY 13 curb inlets vs TY R where the sidewalk is attached to the curb. 5. If necessary, raise Spraddle Creek vault #1 manhole to finished grade. 6. The cross-walk at the roundabout shall be asphalt thru the travel lanes and concrete only across the median. 7. Use CDOT TY 3A curb ramps at the roundabout, 6' width at the throat. 8. Storm line A shall be at I% minimum slope. Leaving the existing proposed invert elev at TY R inlet 3 and working upstream at 1% appears to still allow for a min of 2' cover at the existing inlet on the north side of the frontage road. 9. Sheet E1.00, please turn off extra curb&gutter alignment. 10. Install 24" conduits to medians for irrigation and 34" conduits to the west median for future use. Spraddle Creek Drainage I . Per previous agreement with the Town, Four-Seasons is responsible for the construction cost of continuing Spraddle Creek to STA 4+40. 2. Install an impermeable membrane around the RCP/CBC due to proposed landscaping and irrigation. 3. Please provide additional detail of proposed walls along the RCP/CBC alignment. Constriction of these walls shall be designed so as not to disturb/undermine the RCP/CBC. W Meadow Drive 1. Final approval of the West Meadow Drive construction drawings will be completed in conjunction with the Town of Vail design. Modifications to tie-in grades on the Four Seasons site may be necessary to accommodate this final design. W Meadow plans shall also develop streetscape related items in the right-of-way (street lighting, landscaping, etc). 2. Storm line G alignment needs to be revised. There is not enough room to install between Spraddle Creek and a large tree on the south side of W Meadow that shall be protected. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. 3. Storm line E appears to in conflict with the recently installed water line. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. Landscaping/Irrigation 1. Detailed landscaping comments to follow within the next couple of weeks. 2. Coordinate irrigation with TOV irrigation supervisor for final head type/location and water source. 3. The Town is currently in talks with CDOT on permissible landscaping within CDOT right-of-way. Fire Department Conditions- I . LSR, MOD's and Administrative Modifications must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protection Engineer of record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not accepted. RJA allegedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence has not been presented. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans is not accepted. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additional review. Cond: CON0010349 Sub-duct system for the dryers and range hoods is not approved. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R090000333 Amount: $1,740.00 04/20/200901:59 PM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: LC Notation: credit card: Mark M. Reed Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 165,532.90 This Payment: $1,740.00 Total ALL Pmts: 165,532.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300, PLAN CK - project GFP012 1,740.00 ~l S A µ .11~ b u"I"It inc. Department January 2nd 2008 Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 YTON Description: Revisions to plans, Bulletins 36, 37, 39, 40, 43, 44, 50, 51, 52, 55, 56 RE: PROJECT: 4 Seasons PERMIT NUMBER: B06-0196 REVISION NUMBER: 21 INTERNAL REF 9008 ADDRESS: 1 Vail Road Dear Mr. Haeberle: SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed the documents to review in accordance with the International Codes as adopted by the Town of Vail. Safebuilt Colorado finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction. Bulletin 55 is a generator fueling piping that the Fire Department has comments pending. Bulletin 56 is a deck extension that requires DRB approval. Warren has been notified. When the Town's Departments have approved their review, these two revisions can be issued. Plan review fee: 29 hours=$1740.00 No additional square footage- No added valuation Sincerely, John Plano Plans Examiner SAFEbuilt Colorado iohn.planou SAFEbuilt.com SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791,/ C:\DOCUME-1 \ADMINI-- I \LOCALS-1 \Temp\XPgrpwise\tov_B06-0196_Rev2I _FAL. doc r Lr`-J yW Page 1 of 1 D TOWN ,'OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Permit # B06-0196 Project PRJ03-0468 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Status . ISSUED Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD Applied 07/18/2006 Parcel No...: 210107101016 Issued. 12/08/2008 Expires . 09/26/2007 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR LAYTON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC 9090 S. SANDY PARKWAY SANDY UTAH 84040 License: 333-A APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS 600 FOSHAY TOWER 821 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 License: C000001981 07/19/2006 07/19/2006 Phone: (801) 568-9090 07/19/2006 Phone: 612-332-1500 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Occupancy Type NIGHT CLUBS (A2) ZONE 4 IB CHURCHES (A3) ZONE 4 IB BUSINESS(B)& HMP (H5 ZONE 4 IB EDUCATIONAL (E) ZONE 4 IB INDUSTRIAL/MOD HAZ ( ZONE 4 IB MERCANTILE (M) ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/HOTELS ( ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/MULTFAM( ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/MOD HAZ (S1) ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/LOW HAZ(S2) ZONE 4 IB Totals... Factor Sq Feet Valuation 299.08 27,353 $8,180,735.24 369.90 8,605 $3,182,989.50 300.40 31,130 $9,351,452.00 322.53 670 $216,095.10 183.77 29,600 $5,439,592.00 220.56 2,445 $539,269.20 302.22 86,991$26,290,420.02 250.22 133,695$33,453,162.90 169.75 23,080 $3,917,830.00 167.15 75,773$12,665,456.95 399,510$103,237,002.9* TOV Adjusted Valuation: 3,237,002.91 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $237,002.91 FEE SUMMARY Building > 378, 777.45 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0. 00 Total Calculated Fees 157, 177.90 Plan Check 378, 777.45 Recreation Fee--------------> 399, 510.00 Additional Fees-----------> $6,615.00 Investigation-> $0.00 TOTAL FEES > 157, 177.90 Total Permit Fee---------- > 163, 792. 90 Will Call-----> $3 . 00 Payments > 163 , 792 . 90 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0. 00 Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e-mailed to applicant. 12/18/2006 cdavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set for plan c stamped by TOV 12/13/06. An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer. 03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR:1215- G&E permit approval only. ConditiE apply. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only 06/12/2007 CDAVIS Action: PA Tower Crane footing pads. No additional fees assessed 07/16/2007 jplano Action: CR Additional work being requested to be adder phasing, correction letter sent. 08/01/2007 jplano Action: CR Second correction letter sent, insuffient information supplied. 3) The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested added work full to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design professiol architect and/or engineer. The design professionals are to verify that the additi( being requested is not in conflict with the corrections that are requested regard: building permit. All sheets are to be stamped and signed by the associated design professional. ThE architectural and the plumbing sheets have not been stamped. The stamp on the stri sheets has not been signed. The stamp on the electrical sheets has not been signe( 4 There is insufficient detail to approve this submittal. Some examples are: a) There are several sections that are pertinent to this request that are not pro' b) The elevator pit sections 10/S4.04, 18/S4.04, 19/S4.04, 20/S4.04 are missing. c) Ramp transition section 22/S6.01, 6/S6.01, 7/S4.04 are missing d) Exterior foundation wall connection to the matt slab 9/S6.01D, 27/S6.01, 61S.0: 7/S6.01 e) Sump pit details 28/S4.04 and 29/S4.04 f) Column schedule, transition of the columns to slab? g) Slab steps 11/S6.01D. This review has stopped because of lack of information. to 5 The Public Works Department in Vail has not approved the submittal for additionz be added to the phasing. Their approval will be necessary. 08/06/2007 jplano Action: PA Additional work approved for phasing. Under plumbing, underground electrical, rebar and concrete placement for elevator and si pits. NO APPROVAL FOR MAT SLAB 109%11/2007 jplano Action: AP 10/22/2007 DPLACE Action: PA only. No charge. 10/22/2007 dplace Action: PA CHARGE. 11/13/2007 ependley Action: AP stamps. No added valuation. 11/15/2007 ependley Action: AP valuation. Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 11/30/2007 jplano Action: AP valuation. Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 12/18/2007 JPLANO Action: AP tension slabs, no added valuation 12/26/2007 jplano Action: AP cable Full permit approved, see conditions REV 4 IR 5881: Approved shop drawings for REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAL REV5/IR6042. Approved shop drawings for de: Rev7/IR6058. Approved RFI-0237, No added Rev6/IR6057. Approved RFI-0221, No added Rev9/IR6236. Approved shop drawings for po: Rev10/IR6252. Approved changing a post ten: with thickened slab. $120.00 due 12/27/2007 MROYER Action: AP Revll/IR6266,6267. Rebar shop drawings rev: for appropiate stamps, no charge 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA REV 12 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER LAYTON Si #05510-004 (EMBEDS @ LEVEL 1, 2, 3 ns 4) FROM JT STEEL NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA EV.13 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER SUBMITTAL 016 hours 023A, (STUD RAILS, LEVELS 4 & 5) FROM SUNCOAST NO ADDTIONAL CHARGE 06/10/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev14,15,16, IR6685,6687,7744 are approved of plan review due, $720.00 07/08/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 19, IR 7989 are approved, Bulletins 10,25,29,31,35,40 - 8 hours of plan review due, $480.00 08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev17, IR 7777 are approved, Bulletins 023 swimming pool revisions, $360 due 08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 20, IR8245 are approved, storm and sewE connetions outside the building, public works has approved it. No charge from Sat( 09/29/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev18, IR7988 are approved. The sub-duct s, for the dryers and range hoods are not approved. 46 hours of plan review due = $2760.( 12/04/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev22/IR9384 - This is the revised ADMOD f( exterior wood above 401. This is to be approved by the fire department to be issued. No chz from SB 12/18/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev23/IR9488, Additional fire-stopping subr approved, no charge 01/02/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev21/IR9008, Approved Bulletins 036, 037, 040, 043, 044, 050, 051, 052, 055, 056 and firestopping submittal. 055, generator fueling needs fire department approval prior to issuance 056, deck extention needs DRB approval prior to issuance 29 hours of plan review due=$1740.00 r 02/09/2009 jplano Action: NA Rev24/IR9666 - Fire Alarm Plans to be apprc the fire department 02/09/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev25/IR9587 - 113M Fire Resistive Wrap 15A' approved for HVAC ducting as shown on apporved plans. 2 hours of plan review Due=$120.00 02/10/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev26/IR9663 - Subduct system for resident: dryer system approved. 8 hours of plan review due=$480.00 Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the He Cross Utility relocation permi absolutely necessary for 10/20/2006 Warren application to dewater the site. 03/31/2007 Warren Excavation in the amount t request. The applicant shall remove only those trees wh: the utility relocation work. Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the Action: AP Planning recieved a bond to cover the Grad: of 3.2 million. Planning has approved the grading and ex( permit. 06/25/2007 Warren Action: COND Planning has approved the full building pej dated recieved on May 29, 2007, with a single condition. A complete Design Review aplication will need to be submitted for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs from of date the pool deck to West Meadow Drive. 08/20/2007 Warren Action: AP The set of plans provided to allow fro the some work prior to release of a full building permit has been approved. The plans stamped July 26, 2007 09/05/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning is approving the set of plans dat( August 3, 2007, with the condition that the applicant submits a revised landscaping plan foi and approval prior to requesting a TCO. 11/02/2007 GRUTHER Action: AP REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITTONA] CHARGE. 06/12/2008 Warren Action: AP The planning departmetn signs off on Buller and 23A with one condition. The gate on teh new set of stairs shat be as the base of t stairs on the pool deck not on the top of the stairs adjacent to Meadow Drive. 09/26/2008 Warren Action: CR Regarding the above permit my only comment I need a detail of the gate at the top of the stairs serving as an exit from the poc This detail shall be depict the desired gate which fits not only the aesthetics of Four Season but that of the Meadow Drive streetscape. The design should take into accoi need for security from the public side of the fence and be design with this in mind. -F( example the Town does not want to see a nice gate submitted, approved, and installed and t because of security reason we add a piece of plexi-glass to the gate as an afterthought. plans are dated 5-8-08 Bullentin #40. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received 04/17/06. on south the of work Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding. Review: Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied: 1. Fire Dept staging on south side of project is shown on east end. The apporved the west end. The hydrant on the west end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on side. Sheet A0.3.00 2. Sheet A0.3.05 does not show an acceptable route to the interior of the buildinc Fire Command Center. 3. The plans submitted by RJA are not stamped and are labeled "Not for Constructic 4. The plans show a dead end corridor behind the front desk. 5. 12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is gi Relocate electrical disconnect to the trailer or provide ready access on southwest site. Location as proposed on plan submitted 12/13/06 is not accepted. 03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: PA g and e permit is approved 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E only 07/11/2007 McGee Action: AP Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3A approved for l: as submitted 7 11 07. 09/07/2007 McGee Action: AP The full permit is approved as noted: Life Safety Report 5 22 07 1. LSR, MOU's, and Admin Mod's must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protect: Engineer of Record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not accepted. RJA alledgedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence ha: been presented. 3. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans, is not accepted. 5. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additionE review. 12/08/2008 MAH Action: AP Rev21/IR9008 - This is the revised ADMOD fc exterior wood above 401. This is to be approved by the fire department to be issued. NO ChZ from SB. PER VERBAL FROM MIKE VAUGHAN, OK TO APPROVE FOR FIRE. Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 10/20/2006 is Action: DN Awaiting for additional information 12/20/2006 is Action: PA Approval to allow grading and prep work foi installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for t site access for small construction vehicles ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive. 03/26/2007 is Action: PA Staging plan for Phase 1 of the G&E permit approved only. Engineer approval for the G&E permit still required currently under review. staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only 08/07/2007 csalli Action: AP additional work proposed for phased permit approved, no approval for mat slab 09/13/2007 csalli Action: DN waiting for executed MOU 10/04/2007 TK Action: AP Approved Building Permit with the condtion: in the memo dated 8/5/07 from Chad Salli. 07/31/2008 csalli Action: AP revised sheets C17, C20 dated 7/18/08 and C18, C18A, C19 dated 7/1/08 approved Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS Item: 05700 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Towropp*able thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TEL T479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. S U O NER OR CON TOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit # B06-0196 as of 02-11-2009 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS J. BRINK 612-332-1500 Job Address: I VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Conditions: Cond: CON0008815 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3/28/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 Applied: 07/18/2006 Issued: 12/08/2008 To Expire: 09/26/2007 The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the frill building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original comment number for clarity. General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule" to prevent a room that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor". The Fire and Life Safety Report prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants. These will be required for full permit issuance. General: The Fire & Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved prior to the approval for full building permit. 3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units 3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is discharging. 8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C-414, is actually a horizontal portion of Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or remove the designation of passageway. 10) See the general comment above. 11) See the general comment above. 12) See the general comment above. 13) See the general comment above. 16) See the general comment above. 22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be tested in accordance with ASTME 1 19, tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire-resistance rating not less than the fire-resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the window when responding for full building permit. 23) See the general comment above. 39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures. Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly, This item has no impact on the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building permit issuance. 42) See response the comment number 39. 46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space is not accessory. 46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 210A as there is no access to stair Q. Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel. 49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved by the Town of Vail's Building Official. 57 through 61 and 149) The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: l'4 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 17 (BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FRJ INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED Cond: 35 (P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: 5 (PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEMF LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPR SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC. Cond: CON0009095 The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review aplication for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs added from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive, within 30 days of the release of the building permit. Cond: CON0009121 The applicant shall submit a seperate Design Review application for review and approval for all signage design, locations, and materials prior to installation. Cond: CON0009294 The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan which addresses the landscaping conflicts created by the shallow soild depths on the culvert containing Spraddle Creek. This plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to requesting a certifcate of occupancy. Cond: CON0009330 SAFEbuilt Colorado Conditions of Approval To: Layton Construction Re: Full Building Permit Conditions of Approval The following conditions will be required to be addressed prior to construction. Sufficient time shall be granted for review, response and approval before work is initiated. Building Department- The items listed within the building department comments are numbered to correspond with the 3 round comment letter dated 08/21/2007. 46. Change the exiting from Vestibule 210A. It appears to exit through intervening room that is not accessory to the vestibule. HGA Response: We submit that the adjacent space is accessory. Vestibule 210A services mechanical rooms and the service elevators. To exit from Vestibule 210A the occupants have to pass through Vestibule 275A, which is basically for the spa staff, then through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area, then to hallway 279, then through exit passageway 293, then through exit passageway 297, then to exit discharge. The issue is that the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area is not accessory to the mechanical rooms. It is accessory for the rooms off Vestibule 275A for the staff of the spa but not the mechanical areas. Please change the layout accordingly. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Vestibule 210A is purely circulation space and does not carry an occupant load. This vestibule provides connection between the Spa and the service elevators, IDF Room 210, and Mechanical Room 257. Relative to egress, it provides the egress route for the one occupant from IDF 210 and the one occupant from Mechanical 257 (as shown on A0.3.02). IDF 210, Mechanical 257, Vestibule 210A, and Service Elevator Lobby E-202 are considered to be part of the overall Spa as they serve Spa functions. The service elevators stop at this location solely to provide connection to the Spa. IDF 210 houses audio-visual, telephone, and data system equipment that specifically serves the Spa and must be accessed by Spa personnel. Similarly, Mechanical 257 houses the equipment serving the pools within Room 255 and must be accessed by Spa staff. In summary, we submit that all these spaces are part of the overall Spa and are "accessory" to each other. Therefore, current layout provides egress that complies with IBC 1013.2 as the spaces are accessory, are not hazard occupancies, and provide a discernible path of travel to an exit. This comment is in reference to the electrical room #212. Please revise 64. A2.03.1 - Wall tag both shafts located in room 304 (storage room). Wall tags must reference an approved assembly from the partition schedule. HGA Response: Wall tag has been added. One shaft in room 304 does not have wall tags. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The drawing has been updated to include wall tags for this shaft. Still have one shaft not tagged Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. 152. Provide accessible parking spaces per IBC Table 1106. 1. Providing 212 spaces would require 7 to be accessible, 2 of those to be van accessible. Verify 98" of vertical clearance for the van spots. HGA Response: We submit that the number of accessible parking stalls complies with IBC Table 1106.1 and section 1106.5. The hotel is operating on 100% valet parking stalls, with an additional 59 self-park stalls for fractional ownership, full ownership, and employee. Per Table 1 106.1, 3 stalls are required for the self-parking, and at least one of the three is required to be van accessible. Plan sheet A0.3.01 indicates there are 228 parking spaces. Spaces marked for Valet parking number 78. With those counts, Table 1106.1.3 would require 5 accessible spaces with one van accessible space. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Per previous response, most of the parking spaces are valet only. There are 59 self-park stalls that will be allocated to fractional ownership, full ownership condos, and employees. The drawings have been updated to identify each space as either valet or self-park. We submit that only the 59 self-park stalls are considered per Table 1106.1 and that the number of accessible spaces required are provided. Deducting the 78 Valet parking from the total spaces, you are still required to add two additional accessible spaces for a total number of 5 accessible spaces. 155. All the massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. Please amend the toilet facilities, changing rooms, lavatories, tubs and the showers meet to accessibility requirements of the ANSI A117.1-98. (IBC 1109.14.3) HGA Response: We submit the Wet Massage Suite #289 complies with the accessibility requirements of ANSI Al 17.1-98 (IBC 1109.14.3). All massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We disagree that IBC 1] 09.14.3 requires that ALL spa treatment rooms be accessible. IBC 1109.14 pertains to "recreational facilities". If the Spa is going to be considered a "recreational facility" then it should be considered as a whole. As such, the Spa is accessible - it provides accessibility at the entry/reception, locker rooms, toilets, showers, whirlpools, lounges, treatment rooms, etc. We submit that nothing requires ALL treatment rooms to be accessible any more than ALL lockers, ALL toilets, or ALL showers. Add grab bars at the tub in room 289 for accessibility. 167. We are unable to locate a designated accessible Type "A" condominium per Section 1107.6.2 of the 2003 IBC. As the condominiums are a different type of R-2 occupancy from the time-share units, an accessible Type "A" condominium is required. HGA Response: Since only 16 condominiums are proposed, no Type "A" units are required. Refer to IBC 1107.6.2.1.1. With the condominiums, employee housing and timeshare units there are a total of 63 units classified as an R-2 occupancy group. Per Section 1107.6.2.1.1 Type A units shall be dispersed among the various classes of units. Therefore a Type A accessible unit is required in each of the following groups: the condominiums, the employee housing, and the timeshare units. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): To resolve this issue we have revised Condo #8 (on Level 9, sheet A4.28.1)) to be a "Type A" unit per ICC/ANSI Al 17.1. Two accessible employee housing units and one accessible timeshare unit are already provided and indicated on the drawings. Comment 169-180 - Submit a Memorandum of Understanding to the Town of Vail for approval by the Building Official to reference the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-1 17.1. If accepted by the town, please revise entire plan to comply with the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1 in its entirety. If not accepted please revise plans per 1998 ANSI A-117.1 and comments above. 169. In the accessible units in the guest rooms of the R-1 occupancy, all bathing & toilet facilities are required to be accessible per Chapter 6 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: We submit that the accessible units include the accessible bathing and toilet facilities and comply with Chapter 6 of ANSI Al 17.1. Plan sheet A4.07.1 A and A4.07.1 B for Unit PR-HC shows a raised platform in media room # 116 which does not have an accessible route. Also, bathrooms/rooms # 103, # 108, # 109, # 1 10, # 133 do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The raised platform within Media 116 is intended to provide tiered seating within this "home theater". We submit that an accessible route is not required for this small platform as it is less than 25% of the overall room and the remainder of the room is accessible. While this room is not an "assembly" space, we submit that IBC 1108.2.4.1, exception 2 provides guidance regarding this room. See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.06.1 for Unit 2KK-HC has bathrooms/rooms #103, #108 which do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.05.3 for Unit 1 K-HC has bathroom # 103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.04AA for Unit ES2-HC has bathroom # 103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.01.1 for Unit Kl -HI has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Unit type K1-HI is a unit for the hearing impaired. It is not an accessible unit. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We submit that only one accessible bathroom is required within an accessible hotel unit. This requirement is consistent with the federal standard - ADAAG Chapter 9. To interpret IBC Chapter 1 1 as requiring that ALL bathrooms must be accessible is to raise the standard beyond the federal requirements. We submit that this is not reasonable, does not reflect industry standard, and is not the intent of the IBC / ICC. Rather, we submit that the IBC / ICC intends to coordinate and correlate with the federal standards. As an example, we can examine the accessibility requirements for condominiums. The federal standard is the FHA Fair Housing Design Manual. This document allows condo units to be provided with one "Specification B" bathroom and that is the highest level of accessibility. Similarly, the 2003 edition of ICC / ANSI A117.1 has been revised to better correlate to FHA and require that "Type A" units provide "at least one" accessible bathroom . The common thread is the requirement is for one or "at least one" accessible bathroom - not all. Since the ADAAG, FHA Design Manual, and A] 17 (2003) all require one or "at least one" accessible bathroom it is reasonable to interpret the IBC's requirements in the same manner. Otherwise, all the hotel units would be held to a higher standard than the condominium units within the same building. 170. In Type "A" dwelling units of the R-2 occupancies, all toilet and bathing facilities must comply with Sections 1002.1 1.1 through 1002.1 1.7 of ANSI A] 17.1. Some Type "A" dwelling units have bathrooms which do not comply. Please clarify. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We request that ICC/ANSI A117.1 - 2003 be used as the applicable edition relative to the "Type A" condominium. This is the most recent version of A 117 and our research has found that the various revisions in Chapter 10 were intended to correct the intent of various provisions and to better coordinate with federal requirements (FHA and ADA). Per 1003.1 1.1 of the Al 17-2003, at least one bathroom is required to comply with 1003.11. This correlates with FHA requirements ("Specification B" bathrooms) and Chapter 9 of the ADA. Therefore, we submit that the latest intent of the various codes and standards is that at least one bathroom, but not all, is required to comply with 1003.11. 171. In Type "A" dwelling units, a permanent seat is required at the head end of the bathtub per Section 607 of ANSI A] 17.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): ICC/ANSI Al 17.1 - 1998, 607.3 states that a permanent seat OR a removable in-tub seat shall be provided. However, 1002.11.6, exception 1, states that the removable in-tub seat required by 607.3 is NOT required. Since 607.3 gives the option of either permanent or removable seats, we submit that the true intent of 1002.11.6, exception 1 is to NOT require either type of seat. ICC / ANSI A] 17.1 - 2003 carries similar language, but also includes Figure 1003.1 1.8 (a) to clarify that the seat (permanent or removable) can be omitted. 172. In Type "A" dwelling units, clearance in front of bathtubs shall extend the length of the bathtub and shall be 30 inches wide minimum per Section 607 of ANSI A] 17.1. Some of the bathtubs have lavatories encroaching into the required clearances. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required bathtub clear floor area is indicated. 173. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.11.1 of ANSI Al 17. 1, doors shall not swing into the clear floor or ground space or clearance for any fixture, unless a clear floor space of 30 inches minimum by 48 inches minimum is located beyond the arc of the door swing. There are water closet compartments and some other bathroom areas that do not meet those requirements. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. The door swings do not swing into the other clear floor spaces. 174. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.13 of ANSI A117.1, where operable windows are provided, at least one window in each sleeping, living, or dining space shall have operable parts complying with Section 1002.13 of ANSI A 117. 1. All windows of "accessible units" shall comply with Section 309 of ANSI Al 17. 1, Operable Parts. Provide documentation showing compliance. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. A note has been added to indicate requirement that all operable windows (and sliding doors) comply with 1002.13. 175. For Type "A" and "accessible units", provide details showing accessibility compliance for the operable parts of the showers, lavatory height, lavatory knee and toe clearance, and bathroom mirror height per Section 1002.11 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to interior elevations shown within the Interior Design drawings. I am unable to locate the Interior Design Drawings in the plan set submitted. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to accessibility details illustrated on sheet A0.4.3. 180. For Type "A" dwelling units, provide details showing accessibility compliance for kitchen work surfaces, sinks, range controls, and refrigerator/freezer requirements per Section 1002.12 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required kitchen features are illustrated. 183. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the condominiums, some "U" shaped kitchens do not have the required 60 inch minimum clearance between opposing base cabinets per Section 1003.12 of ANSI Al 17.1. HGA Response: Sheets A4.22.1, A4.25.1, and A4.30.1 have been revised to provide 60" clearance at U-shaped kitchens. Provide corrected plan sheets. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These sheets are included in the 7/18/07 resubmittal set. 185. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the time share units, the water closets do not have required clearances and some doors encroach required clearances per Section 1003.11.2 of ANSI A117. 1. HGA Response: Refer to the response to comment # 186 below. As such, there are no Type "B" timeshare units. See response to comment # 186. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to response to comment # 186. 186. Is Option "A" being used for the bathroom fixtures in the Type "B", Time-share units? If so, each fixture is required to meet the requirements of the option per Section 1003.1 1.3.1 of ANSI A117.1. Please clarify. HGA Response: As previously discussed and resolved, the timeshare units are transient occupancy (similar to hotel units) and not residences. As such, one accessible timeshare unit is provided per IBC Table 1107.6.1.1. This accessible unit is #3103 located on Level 03. The enlarged plan for this accessible unit is on sheet A4.12.1 A and the associated H/C bathroom in 2/A4.12.2A. Provide signed letters from persons representing the operating authority for this facility stating that the timeshare units will not be used as residences. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These letters will be submitted by ownership 203. Enclose both mechanical rooms on the 9th level in 2 hour rated construction, it appears that the 2 hour shafts from below terminate in these rooms. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet M4.06 (Part Plan Attachment No. M06). The Area 3A mechanical room is unrated, and the 2 hour rated vertical risers through the building through the 8th floor slab. In order to avoid the installation of inaccessible fire dampers at the top of the riser, RYBKA have revised sheet M4.06 to ductwork is to be fire rated in the attic space. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. The Area 3B mechanical room is a 2 hour rated room that ends at column line A] 4. The ductwork that extends to the south across column line A] 4 is 2 hour fire rated to avoid the installation of fire dampers in inaccessible locations. Fire dampers are shown in the penetrations of the two hour rated Area 3B mechanical room, where ductwork exist the mechanical room. A) The mechanical room on the 9th level over "AREA-03A"has not been addressed on the plan sheets. The partial ninth floor plan on 8 Y2" x 11" indicate wrapping ducts. If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. Ductwork is to be wrapped to provide 2 hour fire rating in attic space. (Refer to Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03). Provide architectural details rated enclosure. B) In the mechanical room labeled 911 the rated walls do not appear to enclose the room entirely. The wall is labeled 30 minutes on the north end and the wall is labeled I hour where Trash 912 (above "AREA-0313") is located on sheet A0.3.09. There are 3 duct penetrations in this area to be addressed, 28x10 S/E F/B, 24x18 G/e F/B and 24x14 S/A F/A TB. Rybka Response: Refer to Architectural Sheet A0.3.09 where Mechanical Room 911 is to be provided with 2 hour rating. Three ducts identified enter riser shaft from Mechanical Room 911 and riser is considered to be connected to and form part of mechanical room and so no fire smoke damper is provided. The ducts in question enter a shaft in the floor below within Maid Room G-71 1. Fire/Smoke Dampers are required where these ducts enter the shaft. One duct is not in a shaft. Please address accordingly. C) How will the 2 hour shaft assembly be maintained at EF-14 and EF-30? If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be rated for operation within rated enclosures by fan manufacturer or are to be relocated within Mechanical Room 911. Provide architectural details for the shafts. 214. Add a fire/smoke damper to the penetration by the 8x6 duct that penetrates the 30 minute fire partition on page M2.08.1 on grid line 11 and between A9 and A 10. Rybka Response: Fire dampers are not required in one hour rated fire barriers per IMC 607.5.2. (Refer to Response No. 208.) This is not a fire barrier; it is a fire partition defining a rated corridor. A fire/smoke damper is required for this duct. Rybka Response: Combination fire smoke damper is provided where this duct exits the rated shaft. The response indicates an Vs damper has been added to the duct as exits the rated shaft. A smoke damper is required where it penetrates the rated corridor. 215. Fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Rybka Response: Mechanical floor plan sheets, sheets M2.01.1 thru M2.11.1 have been revised to show: it Combination fire smoke dampers (FSD) or shunt duct* on rated shaft penetrations. It FD in duct floor penetrations when no more than three floors are penetrated, and FD on 2 hour rated wall penetrations. * shunt ducts per NFPA 90A (2002), Figure A.5.3. NFPA 90A is not an adopted document by the Town of Vail or referenced in the IMC. The review team is not familiar with the term "shunt duct". Fire smoke dampers are required at the shaft and corridor duct penetrations. (IMC 607.5.3, 607.5.4 and 607.5.5.1) Rybka Response: The 2006 IMC now calls the use of 22" upturned sheet metal ducts in 2 hour fire rated risers as 'sub ducts'. The provision of the 'sub duct' is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. The use of sub ducts on the project is shown in Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03. M2.03.1 - Remove designations for shunt ducts for the ducts run in the garage exhaust shaft. Rybka Response: EF-8, EF-43 and residential dryer exhaust have been shown terminating in a vertical areaway (garage exhaust riser) that is always being exhausted by EF-1 B on emergency power. It was agreed during the June TOV plan review meeting that this condition is analogous to the 'sub duct' provisions identified earlier. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 2. In Group B and R occupancies equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 of the International Building Code, smoke dampers are not required at penetrations of shafts where kitchen, clothes, dryer, bathroom and toilet room exhaust openings with steel exhaust subducts, having a wall thickness of at least 0.019 inch (0.48 mm) extend at least 22 inches (559 mm) vertically and the exhaust fan at the upper terminus is powered continuously in accordance with the provisions of Section 909.11 of the International Building Code, and maintains airflow upward to the outdoors. The drawings are still substantially incomplete when labeling FSD's. I will attempt to identify some locations. It will be up to the design team to identify all locations. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts exit rated shafts. All drawings are indicting F.D. on the bathroom exhausts where penetrating the shaft. There is an administrative modification request to eliminate dampers on the bathroom exhausts. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FD designations at restroom exhausts have been deleted where 'sub-ducts' are provided per the administrative modification. The drawings are indicating ducts from below and ducts from above. Please create a tag for sub-ducts and clearly mark the plans on all the ducts that are to be utilizing this system. M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-301 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 2-8x6 ducts and 1-10x6 duct. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-311 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 1-8x10 duct and 1-12x6. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-301 and C-311 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - All duct penetrations through the shafts are marked F.D. These are required to be FSD. There are too many to list individually. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts penetrate rated shafts. There are multiple places that indicate FSD's where an administrative modification has been requested to utilize a 22" sub-duct. Please coordinate. M2.04.1 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-401 and C-41 1 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.04.1 - There is a 14x10 duct supplying corridor C-41 1 missing a damper designation. The duct is near A9.9 and 11/11.4. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. This duct has changed size to 12x8 since last review. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) These are just a few of the un-complying damper designations, stopped review on this correction. Again, fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Reconfiguration is still necessary. 216. Ductwork, pipes and electrical are prohibited in an exit passageways unless serving the exit passageway. It appears that above non-rated ceilings in the exit passageways the space is being used as a plenum and contains construction elements not allowed, please address all exit passageways. Rybka Response: Mechanical services not associated with exit passageways have been relocated. The review team's interpretation of IBC 1020.5 is that any ductwork serving an exit passageway shall be a completely separate system from the rest of the building and separate from all other passageways. Also, this system is required for pressurization. 1020.5 Penetrations. Penetrations into and openings through an exit passageway are prohibited except for required exit doors, equipment and ductwork necessary for independent pressurization, sprinkler piping, standpipes, electrical raceway for fire department communication and electrical raceway serving the exit passageway and terminating at a steel box not exceeding 16 square inches (0.010 m2). Such penetrations shall be protected in accordance with Section 712. There shall be no penetrations or communicating openings, whether protected or not, between adjacent exit passageways. Rybka Response: It is our understanding that only portions of the building service systems that serve the exit enclosure are allowed to penetrate the exit enclosure. We note that IBC 1019.1.3, VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURE, VENTILATION, Item.2 permits HVAC equipment (FCUs) to be located in the exit enclosure: 1019.1.3 Ventilation. Equipment and ductwork for exit enclosure ventilation shall ....where located within the building, be separated from the remainder of the building, including other mechanical equipment, with construction as required for shafts. All ductwork serving the exit passageways shall be protected at the point of penetration of the passageway with a fire/smoke damper. The passageway is an extension of the vertical exit enclosure that it serves and lesser protection is not allowed. (101 7.1) Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, and have provided FSD where make-up air ductwork penetrates the exit enclosure. M2.03.I- There is a duct termination shown in Stair Q exit enclosure, labeled "16x12 Employee Dryer T/A". This is not allowed in an exit enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been revised to show routing of dryer exhaust so that it does not pass through Stair Q. M2.04.1 - There is an 8x6 duct penetration within the exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.04.1 - There is a transfer opening 24x4 within exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization; this transfer opening is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.05.3 - There is a 6" duct shown penetrating Stair N exit enclosure. Please move out of the enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.05.3 has been revised and ductwork has been rerouted so as not to pass through Stair N. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-601 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the elevator lobby and maid's room. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-601. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 3.3/4 and A 11. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - There is a duct penetration between Exit Passageway C-601 and Stair S-601. Penetrations are not allowed. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-611 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-611 is not deliberate and is to be deleted. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 and a 12x6 duct passing through Exit Passageway C-61 1. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. Grid lines 11/11.4 and A8.2/A9.9. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There is a 20x10 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-61 1. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 133/134.3 and BC/BD. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.2 - There is a 12x10 duct penetrating the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that Stair S-605 is connected to exit passageway C-614. and that the 'unlabeled passageway' is rated 2 hours, this upper level of the hallway is rated to provide separation between levels 4 and 5 and this portion of the ceiling space does connect to a rated vertical exit enclosure, the hallway is not an exit passageway, and that 1020.5 does not apply. M2.06.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: See previous comment. M2.07.2 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-717 are not intended to function as returns, are to be shown 'blanked-off and are provided for aesthetic reasons only. M2.07.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.3 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.08.1 and M2.08.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-803. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. Penetrations are not allowed fire wrapped or not. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. These comments are still outstanding. Tim Willings P.E. with Rybka met with the plans examiner on 8/14/07 to bring updated drawings addressing these corrections. It was advised to submit the drawings when all other comments are addressed. 222. Please address the garage exhaust on the east side of the structure that will cause a nuisance thru the casement windows (WI 02) in rooms 5318, 6318 and 7318. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet A2.05.2 for plan location, and sheet A0.7.2 (W 102) for window type. Architect to revise window to be fixed type. HGA Response: The architectural documents have been revised to provide fixed windows at these three locations. The architectural drawings are indicating windows W 102. This window is casement not fixed on sheet A0.7.2. Please coordinate. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Revised drawings indicating fixed windows at these locations are included with this resubmittal. Since this review, the Town of Vail has informed our review team that garage exhausts on the CO2 detectors are product-conveying outlets requiring being 10' above grade, 10' from openings into the building and 10' from property lines. The continuous fan is considered environmental, thus allowing 3' from openings and 3' from property lines. Please address accordingly. 224. Please indicate how the 18" flue from the gas ironer, on the 3rd level is routed thru the loading dock above on the 4th level. Rybka Response: Laundry gas-fired flat ironer vent leaves the laundry room at level 3 (Sheet M2.03.1) and runs vertically through the building in a rated chase with fire enclosed offsets before being vented at the roof of level 11 (Sheet M2.11.1). M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Provide architectural details for the shaft. 228. Specify on the plans the location of EC-1, Type I fan for the kitchen. Rybka Response: Sheet M4.04 has been revised to show Ecology Unit EC-1 in Ecology Room M-402A. Ecology Room M-402A as designed is a component of the grease duct enclosure. "The duct enclosure shall serve a single grease exhaust duct system and shall not contain any other ducts, piping, wiring or systems." Remove the other exhaust fans, ducting and electrical within the room not associated with the Type 1 duct. (IMC 506.3. 10) Rybka Response: The 2 hour rated architectural enclosure of the Ecology unit has been reconfigured to that only the ductwork and equipment associated with the commercial kitchen exhaust is contained within the Ecology Room M-402A. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour wall and 90 minute door that is shown on the mechanical drawings. 233. Indicate on the plans that the 36" dryer duct and the 18" flue from the Ironer are in a 2 hour shaft on the 6th level, page M2.06.1. Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, the 36" dryer exhaust duct and 18" gas-fired flat ironer vent that both run horizontally at level 6 (on sheet M2.06. I) are to be in a 2-hr fire rated enclosure. M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. (from comment 224) Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour shaft walls and details for construction. Please show compliance to IBC 707.11 for the bottom of the shaft housing the 34" dryer duct. 234. Provide manufacturers instructions to verify the dryers in rooms 312 and 31 OD are capable of exhausting the developed length shown on the plans. Rybka Response: Residential dryer exhaust system shown on Sheet M2.03.1 serving Employee Laundry Room 31 OD and Valet Room 317, with quantity five (4+1) dryer exhaust connections to dryer exhaust EF-43 has been rerouted. In addition to the lint filter integral to the appliance, and auxiliary lint trap and cleanout has been shown on the common dryer exhaust duct system before the duct leaves the Employee Laundry Room 31 OD. The entire length of the residential dryer exhaust duct is to be fire wrapped to maintain clearances to combustibles. Discharge of laundry dryer exhaust is routed to exterior via connection to rated garage exhaust riser. Penetration is protected by fire wrap and minimum 22" shunt duct extended into garage exhaust riser. In addition, RYBKA have specified a laundry exhaust booster fan EF-43 which is interlocked with dryer operation. Dryer exhaust ducts are required to terminate to the outside the building and shall be equipped with a back draft damper, also clothes dryer exhaust ducts shall not extend into or through ducts or plenums. Route the dryer ducts directly to the exterior with a back draft damper. (IMC 504.4) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by showing the backdraft damper. The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 238. The Laundry Layout, page LA 1.2, indicates a flue pipe for the dry cleaner in room #317. Add the flue and the 2 hour chase to the architectural sheets and to the mechanical sheets, clarify that it does not pass through a plenum. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.03.1 to show dry cleaning machine exhaust fan EF-8 and ducted connection to outdoors. M2.03.1 - The termination is shown with a 22" sub-duct within the garage exhaust duct. This is not to the exterior as required per IMC 502.7.3.6. The review team also is concerned that when the garage exhaust is not operating the Rimes from the dry cleaning can migrate to the garage. Terminate the dry cleaning exhaust to the exterior. Rybka Response: The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 244. Add a 2 hour shaft below and proper opening protection for the duct designated as 24x14 S/A F/A-24x12 S/A T/B on page M2.08.1 on grid line l0A and between 10.5/11. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1 and relocated the duct riser to the protected shaft in the North West corner of the Maids Room G-811. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by properly coordinating the duct offset/riser transfer shown at this level with rated shaft location or rating requirements. These two ducts that transition between shafts that are not aligned between the 8th and 9th floor levels are both to be shown enclosed in a 2 hour rated drywall enclosure, negating the need for combination fire smoke dampers, except where duct connections penetrate the shaft wall (one location). The duct on this level is indicating 24x14 S/A(supply air) F/A(from above). The 9th floor level or the enlarged M4.06 does not show this duct. Please clarify. 245. Add a 2 hour shaft or designate a fire damper for the 28x 10 and the 28x 14 as it passes through a 2 hour floor/ceiling assembly into the mechanical room above. On page M2.08.1 between grid lines 10.5 /11 and A8.2/A9.9. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that ducts that rise vertically through the building that are protected with two hour fire rated enclosures and are connected to a 2 hour rated mechanical room at the highest level do not have a fire damper at the floor penetration of the mechanical room. Rybka submits that the 2 hour rated shaft enclosure is an extension of the 2 hour rating of the mechanical room fire rated enclosure. There is a 24x10 duct shown penetrating the shaft connecting to the 28x10 duct within the shaft. Add the S/F damper at this location. (The architectural overlays indicate a shaft too small to house the duct?) There is a 24x18 duct shown in this vicinity penetrating the floor/ceiling above. Please address with a fire damper. 246. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 8x10 duct on page M2.07.2 between grid lines A8.2/A9.9 and 10/10.5. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1. The duct has not been addressed on all levels also see comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by coordinating the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7, 8, 9 and 10 and attic levels (Sheets M2.07.2, M2.08.2, M2.09.2, M2.10.2 and M2.11.1). Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft wall (one location each occupied floor). The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands, the duct in question has been changed to 12x18 on the 7th level. 247. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 12x6 duct on page M2.07.1 between grid lines A6/A7 and on grid line 4.2. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1, M2.08.1, M209.1. This duct serving the elevator lobbies has not been addressed. Rybka Response: Rybka will coordinate the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7 in this location with level above and below. Rybka will correct this by rerouting existing ductwork through rated risers provided by HGA in these locations and Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft . The same issue as response to #246. The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands. The supply duct from level 11 to 10 has no shaft, the duct runs horizontally on the 9th level with no shaft and runs to the 7th level with fire dampers at the floors of the 8th and 9th. This duct requires a shaft. 264. Fire dampers and rated shafts for ductwork through floor/ceiling assemblies are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Refer to response to comment 215 Here are some floor penetrations by ducts that have not been addressed, please evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. M2.03.1 - 12x20 duct, grid lines A4.6 and 2.7/3 The duct in question has changed to 20x16. The vertical and horizontal shafts need to be shown on the architectural sheets. M2.03.1 - 18x14 duct, grid lines A12 and 3.3/4 The horizontal shaft shown on M2.02.1 is not shown on the architectural sheets. M2.04.1 - 16x10 duct, grid lines A13 and 3.3/4 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.04 - 12x6 duct, grid lines A 10/A 11 and 10.5111 A fire damper has been added to the 2 floors above. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. M2.04 - 8x6 duct, grid lines AIO/AI I and 10.5/11 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. The duct is connecting more than 2 stories below the shaft. M2.04 - 6x 12 duct, grid lines A 10 and 10.5 The drawings have been changed to add fire dampers at the floor line. This duct connects more than 2 stories, a shaft is required. M2.05 - 26x14 R/A, grid lines A6/A7 and 5 A fire damper is required at the floor between the 5th and 6th level. M2.05 - 12x12 paint shop exhaust, 12x12 carpenter exhaust and a 24x12 sanitary duct, grid lines A4.6 and 4/5. These ducts traverse from what appears to be a rated shaft from below through the Resid. Club Concierge Desk (512) room up through the ceiling with no protection. This duct enters a shaft on this level, add a fire damper to the duct as it enters the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.05 - 6x6, 8x6, (2)12x6 and 10x20 ducts, grid lines A10 and 10/10.5 M2.05 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10 and 10.5/11 Review on duct penetrations through the floors has been stopped. The plans examiner's function is not to make a punch list for the design team. Evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that fire dampers, rated shafts and combination fire smoke dampers have been added to the floor plans in general conformance with requirements of the plan reviewer. Additional damper, combination fir dampers and shaft wall construction will be required where this drawing revision has not correctly identified that they are required. Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. Structural Conditions- The conditions listed are taken from the last comment letter dated 07/18/2007. The open issues are listed in Red. S106 F 9,11,14/S6.01 E Sheet S2.03.2: 12 ft. cantilever retaining wall extension of exterior two span wall below, outside of ballroom areaway on line A 1 I between 14 and 14.5 has not been checked and appears to be overstressed for flexure, please check. Consider moment resisting joints at slab to wall connections. Design / detail planter wall. These details require rebar and splices to be shown for proper detailing and construction. Verify cantilever deflection. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S110 F S2.02.4 No calculations have been provided for the cantilevered retaining wall around the pool structure, or on gridline D1. Verify lateral load capacity, consider pedestrian surcharge and water surcharge due to site drains behind this wall as appropriate. Verify footing width. KL&A 6/26/07: Wall in question between gridlines 6-8.5 south of A 18 supports roof loads and also is the lateral load path for pool structure loading, and for roof uplift for partially enclosed structures. Wall also is monolithic with Area 3A perimeter building wall. Design is part of EOR's scope, please provide wall designs accounting for support of roof structure. KL&A 8/31/07: Coordinate new retaining wall detail 21/S4.03 with foundations shown on plan, S2.02.4. Verify new steel roof around pool structure will resist lateral soil reaction of 1.0 klf, verify metal deck shear strength and connection to resisting perpendicular retaining walls. S128 GS S2.09.3 Top slab bars l OT3 & l OT6 are shown at line 10.6/A 14. It seems these bars are shown in error as the concrete beam is upturned at this location. Beams south of line A12.2 are not identified. Please check. IBC 1603.1. details are required. KL&A 6/26/07: Top bars also appear required at gridline A10. 52.09.3 PT profile is incomplete, KL&A 8/31/07: Top bars are still not shown on plan, please review. S145 LS 1/S3.02C Wall thickness is shown as 8 inches. Plan S201.2 indicates a 12" exterior foundation wall, please coordinate. KL&A 6/26/07: Coordinate reinforcing shown on shear wall elevation with 'W2' or'W3' per S2.01.2, it is unclear which wall type controls for soil lateral loading. Wall must span two way due to stair shaft opening, verify designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S164 LS S2.11 Provide detail of roof diaphragm to concrete cores. Provide or indicate detail of steel beams to concrete cores for gravity plus lateral loading, per ASCE 7-02 load combinations. Verify drag loads and chord force detailing at eave framing. Verify diaphragm welding is sufficient for expected shear forces, provide shear and moment diagram at roof deck levels. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7. KL&A 6/26/07: New detail 13/S1.0.5B:Welded studs, thickness and dimensions of embed plate are not defined. Please provide this information for all beams and reaction conditions on the drawings. Verify connection is adequate with short slot or long slot holes in the shear tab, if permitted for erection. Provide roof diaphragm calculations per original comment. IBC 1911, 1912, 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S165 LS 52.11 Provide detail of concrete diaphragm to concrete cores, verify shear transfer at each level and comment whether any drags are required. Verify if typical details 12 & 23/S 1.03A apply throughout the job. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S169 LS S3.02A Calculations show a significant force reversal / back-stay effect from Level 6 to Level 5 shear force, i.e. SW 14 & SW 16. Verify this load path has been designed for the loads per 3D analysis. Verify soil plus wind / seismic loading has been used for drag design. Note per plan, S2.05.1, a large hole exists adjacent to wall SW 16, and per calculations page 536, (38+57)=95k shear transfer is required. No drags are shown on plan. Please verify. Note, elevations S3.02A show 45 @ 14" o.c. at upper levels, calculations shown (2) #5 @ 24" o.c., please verify designs match calculations. IBC 1616.1.1, IBC 1604.4. KL&A 6/26/07: Original comment calculated (38+57)=95k load for SW 14 not SW 16 as noted, however collector bars have not been added for SW 14. SW 16 collector load is (86+143)=229k, (4) #7 shown on plan are not adequate for 229k, please review all collector designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S171 S2.11.1-2, etc. Roof framing plans are incomplete. Please address the following and confirm detailing will be provided in future drawings issues, per IBC 1604.2, 2205.1. a) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed b) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed c) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed d) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed e) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed 0 KL&A 8/31/07: Closed g) W8 & W 16 eave supports do not cantilever outwards and support eave in RAM analysis submitted, instead all load is transferred directly to columns via eave rim beam. Verify eave supports and perimeter girders are adequately sized KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. h) S2.09.3, etc: HSS6x6 to W8, W 14 moment connection at eave needs a detail KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. i) I /S2.10.3: W 16x31 on line A 10.5 is shown as W 18x35 per calculations, please verify all beams match calculations. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S172 I /S2.08.3 W 18x46 eave support girder near gridlines CB-C 1 is shown as W21 x44 per calculations; W 1400 on line BE is shown as W21 x48 per calculations. Several cantilevered eave moment connection supports are shown without a backspan member. Please review. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 1/S2.08.3 Verify lateral support of the low roof structure for wind and seismic loading; low roof section is not connected to Level 8 PT slab beyond or core walls within the roof area, and braced frames are not shown. Similar at 2/S2.08.3 and other low roof structures. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 11,26,28/S7.01 A Calculations indicate that roof deck is attached to slab edge along line 2 and other locations where deck and floor slab are near the same elevation. Provide a detail for lateral roof to slab connection where required by lateral analysis. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S174 S2.11.1, etc Show roof diaphragm to concrete core connection, consider in-plane collector shear forces and out of plane anchorage forces. IBC 1604.8.2; ASCE 7, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. 5175 S2.11.1 Verify diaphragm continuity at dormers line A5 between upper roof deck and lower roof deck, provide collectors as required for in plane shear and out of plane shear. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S176 S2.09.2 Roof ridge support columns near15.5-A4.8 shown on S2.11.2 are not supported by slab below, please check. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Column in question is 20 feet tall, verify HSS5x5 is adequate, per 52.11.2. S178 A2.11.1 R, etc. Structural roof plans do not incorporate snow fences shown on architectural drawings. Please provide snow fence with adequate structural connection shear and moment associated with sliding snow. IBC 1608. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. KL&A 8/31/07: COMMENTS ON NEW DETAILS FOLLOW S187 21/S4.03 Minimum depth shall be 48" for frost depth requirement. IBC 1805.2.1. Verify wall vertical rebar is adequately developed at top of footing, ACI 318, 12.2. Appears that variables D and D' are reversed with calculations variables hf and hp, please review. IBC 1806. S188 S5.03 Revised beams 4138 & 4139 appear too shallow to support one way slab at ramp. Shear ties are spaced greater than d/2. Please review beam sizes for ramp loads. IBC 1604.2. Planning Department Conditions- From: Warren Cambell Submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval prior to requesting a TCO. Public Works Conditions- From: Chad Salli, Project Engineer 1. Install snowmelt in loading dock dwy. Sheet M5.15 not in resubmittal package, Sheet M5.14 shows heat in the southern half of the dwy. The dwy should be heated from the back of pan along the Frontage Rd to the trench drain. 2. The fountain entry feature shall not be public right-of-way, please remove from right-of-way. 3. The two tier retaining wall shall be designed/stamped by a Colorado registered professional engineer, greater than 4' in height from the top of wall to the bottom of the foundation. 4. Provide Final Drainage report including hydrology and hydraulic analyses (Box culvert, Storm pipe, inlets, swales, etc...). This shall include storm sewer profiles with HGL shown. A 100 yr analysis shall be completed showing no private/public property damage as a result. Provide capacity analysis for major swales and all inlets. The SCS method may be used for large mountain basins, the Rational method shall be used for the smaller site and developed basins. 5. A Developer Improvement Agreement will be required prior to release of permit. 6. Show proposed location for Comcast fiber line along the west property line. Frontage Road/Vail Road 1. Town of Vail Street lights shall be placed at 50' spacings along the project limits. Coordinate with TOV electricians for electric meter location. Relocate private lighting to private property. 2. Set back (detach) the frontage rd sidewalk 6' from back of curb east of the porte cochere exit. Sod shall be installed between the curb and walk. 3. Use attached sidewalk detail for sidewalks located within the right-of-way. 4. Use TY 13 curb inlets vs TY R where the sidewalk is attached to the curb. 5. If necessary, raise Spraddle Creek vault #1 manhole to finished grade. 6. The cross-walk at the roundabout shall be asphalt thru the travel lanes and concrete only across the median. 7. Use CDOT TY 3A curb ramps at the roundabout, 6' width at the throat. 8. Storm line A shall be at I% minimum slope. Leaving the existing proposed invert elev at TY R inlet 3 and working upstream at 1 % appears to still allow for a min of 2' cover at the existing inlet on the north side of the frontage road. 9. Sheet E1.00, please turn off extra curb&gutter alignment. 10. Install 24" conduits to medians for irrigation and 34" conduits to the west median for future use. Spraddle Creek Drainage I . Per previous agreement with the Town, Four-Seasons is responsible for the construction cost of continuing Spraddle Creek to STA 4+40. 2. Install an impermeable membrane around the RCP/CBC due to proposed landscaping and irrigation. 3. Please provide additional detail of proposed walls along the RCP/CBC alignment. Construction of these walls shall be designed so as not to disturb/undermine the RCP/CBC. W Meadow Drive 1. Final approval of the West Meadow Drive construction drawings will be completed in conjunction with the Town of Vail design. Modifications to tie-in grades on the Four Seasons site may be necessary to accommodate this final design. W Meadow plans shall also develop streetscape related items in the right-of-way (street lighting, landscaping, etc). 2. Storm line G alignment needs to be revised. There is not enough room to install between Spraddle Creek and a large tree on the south side of W Meadow that shall be protected. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. 3. Storm line E appears to in conflict with the recently installed water line. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. Landscaping/irrigation 1. Detailed landscaping comments to follow within the next couple of weeks. 2. Coordinate irrigation with TOV irrigation supervisor for final head type/location and water source. 3. The Town is currently in talks with CDOT on permissible landscaping within CDOT right-of-way. Fire Department Conditions- I . LSR, MOU's and Administrative Modifications must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protection Engineer of record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not accepted. RJA allegedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence has not been presented. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans is not accepted. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additional review. Cond: CON0010349 Sub-duct system for the dryers and range hoods is not approved. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R090000143 Amount: $480.00 02/11/200910:40 AM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: LC Notation: credit card - Mark M. Reed Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 163,792.90 This Payment: $480.00 Total ALL Pmts: 163,792.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300, PLAN CK - project GFP012 480.00 SAFFbuiknc. C 0 L ORAD0 Building Department Services January 10, 2009 Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Description: Residential Dryer Sub-duct System RE: PROJECT: 4 Seasons PERMIT NUMBER: B06-0196 REVISION NUMBER: 26 INTERNAL REF 9663 ADDRESS: 1 Vail Road Dear Mr. Haeberle: SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed the documents in accordance with the International Codes as adopted by the Town of Vail and per the direction the Town indicated during meetings on October 15th 2008 and January 5th 2009. The town building official has indicated that the sub-duct system is a performance based design and the design professional is taking full responsibility for the design and installation. The drawings are to be stamped by the mechanical engineer and approved by the fire protection engineer for the project. The specifics of the air flows is the engineer's responsibility and is part of the performance based design. The fire protection engineer has included a letter of acceptance for the design. Cleanouts are shown on the plans. Construction constraints in the field may require additional offsets in the ducts not shown on the plans, thus requiring additional cleanouts. This will have to be addressed in the field. Plans: Description: 16 mechanical sheets One letter from the fire protection engineer Plan review fee: 8 hours = $480.00 No additional square footage- No added valuation Sincerely, John Plano Plans Examiner SAFEbuilt Colorado john.plano(LuSAFEbuilt.com Page 1 of I SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov B06-0196 Rev26 FAL.doc 71 PJA ROLF JENSEN 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. FIRE PROTECTION CONSULTANTS January 27, 2009 "rov OFFICE COPY (2~ V Z~ VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL: JCURTIS(a-)HKSINC.COM Mr. John Curtis HKS Hill Glazier Studio HKS Architect, Inc. 1 Vail Road Vail, Colorado 81657 FOUR SEASONS HOTEL & RESORTS (PROJECT #02028) DRYER EXHAUST USING SUB-DUCTS Dear Mr. Curtis: 670 west Fulton Street Suite 500 Chicago. L 60661 USA www,ooinc.com +1312-879-7200 Fax: +1312-879-7210 REVIEWED BY =EB 23199 SAFEbuilt Colorado At your request and the request of the Town of Vail, Rolf Jensen and Associates (RJA) has reviewed the mechanical construction drawings for the above referenced project revised January 9, 2009 for purposes of determining if the design of sub-ducted dryer exhaust systems meets the intent of our Life Safety Report, dated May 15, 2005. Accompanying the revised construction drawings are specifications for a lint trap, dryer box, sub-duct riser and pressure transmitter as well as email communications between RJA and MMM Group. Currently, the 2003 International Building Code (IBC) only permits the use of sub-ducts within Group B occupancies for bathroom and toilet exhaust. As part of the original design submittal, RJA submitted an Administrative Modification Request (AMR) to permit the use of sub-ducts within the Four Seasons Hotel & Resort, predicated in part on the fact that the 2006 edition of the IBC permits this within Group R occupancies. The AMR discussed the deletion of smoke dampers for shaft penetrations of bathroom and toilet exhaust systems only. RJA was recently informed that it was the intent of design to use sub-ducts for clothes dryer and kitchen hood exhaust systems as well. This letter discusses specifically the conditions under which we believe a sub-ducted dryer exhaust system would provide an equivalent level of life safety and whether the proposed design meets this intent. 0 2009 Rolf Jensen & Associates, Inc. All Rights Reserved FOUR SEASONS HOTEL & RESORTS, VAIL COLORADO V31063 - Page 2 DRYER EXHAUST USING SUB DUCTS January 22, 2009 Revised January27, 2009 Code Requirements The 2006 IBC does permit kitchen, clothes dryer, bathroom and toilet room exhaust systems to be sub-ducted into a larger duct within a shaft without requiring that duct penetrations be equipped with fire or smoke dampers in accordance with IBC Section 716.5.3 exception 2. The constraints placed on this exception are as follows: 1. That the use of the building be a Group B or R occupancy fully protected with a sprinkler system designed in accordance with NFPA 13; 2. That the sub ducts be constructed of steel with a minimum wall thickness of 0.019 inches that extend vertically a minimum of 22 inches into the common duct; 3. That the common duct and all sub-ducts be continuously ventilated by an exhaust fan located at the upper terminus of the shaft; such fan being powered by a primary and secondary power source complying with standby power requirements; and 4. That such fan maintains a continuous upward airflow to the outside. The proposed sub-duct design appears to meet all the code requirements listed above. Code Intent We believe the intent of the last code requirement is that the common duct be kept under constant negative pressure relative to the rest of the building so as to control products of combustion from re-entering other portions of the building via the common duct. We believe that if this intent can be met through design, there is no conflict with the intent of our Life Safety Report. For clothes dryer systems especially, the following factors should be considered: • Lint is combustible and will build up within portions of any dryer exhaust system. Lint should be mitigated from entering the common duct and adequate clean outs should be provided; • The exhaust fan must consistently overcome the volume flow rate of multiple dryers and overcome the duct pressure loss in order to maintain a constant negative pressure relative to the building. The number of dryers operating at the same time should be carefully considered based on location and experience. Discussion/Design The drawings provided by the mechanical engineer indicate ducted dryer exhaust systems which appear to meet the code requirements and intent expressed above. Specifically, a secondary lint trap has been provided for each dryer prior to entering the common duct. A backdraft damper has also been located directly upstream from the secondary lint trap to avoid possible exhaust from one unit to another. While this will FOUR SEASONS HOTEL & RESORTS, VAIL COLORADO V31063 - Page 3 DRYER EXHAUST USING SUB DUCTS January 22, 2009 Revised January27, 2009 mitigate the amount of lint being introduced to the common duct, a maintenance plan must be put in place to clean out this secondary lint trap on a regular basis. The amount of lint build up will depend on the number of dryer uses and type of unit. Recommended frequency of clean outs should be discussed with the manufacturer, building operator and included as part of scheduled maintenance activities. In order to provide a constant negative pressure to the common duct, a pressure sensor will be installed to regulate the speed of the exhaust fan depending on how many dryers are operating. We understand that the design calls for the minimum volume flow rate of each exhaust fan to be set at 200 cfm (the listed exhaust rate of one dryer) per riser and the maximum flow rate to be set at 110% of the capacity of all but one dryer on each system as listed below: Fan No. Dryers Risers Min. Fan Capacity Max. Fan Capacity Actual Max. Fan Capacity Static Pressure (inches H20) EF-37 11 3 600 2200 2200 1 EF-50 4 1 200 660 800 1.5 EF-53 4 1 200 660 800 1.5 EF-48 10 3 600 1980 1500 0.5 EF-22 6 2 400 1100 1200 1.5 This design allows all but one existing fan to remain as installed (EF-48 is undersized for the proposed design). We are comfortable with the calculation of all but one dryer on each system because 1) the likelihood that all dryers on a single system will operate at the same time is fairly low and 2) if all dryers are operating, it is not possible for dryer exhaust to backflow into another unit. We recognize that this assumes a small chance that the common duct could be positively pressurized; however, combined with the risk of a fire incident at the same time, this design presents an acceptable level of risk. The pressure sensor or transmitter to be used in the design indicates a range of 0.1 to 25 inches WC with a maximum overpressure of 10 psid and appears adequate for the intended use. As required by code discussed above, these fans must operate continuously and be provided with standby power. In addition to this, we feel that the exhaust fans and pressure sensors should be monitored as part of the building automations system (BAS) for proper range of operation. We do not feel the intent of the code would be met by leaving these systems un-monitored. We also do not feel that these systems should be monitored by the fire alarm system (FAS) since they are not part of the building smoke management system. Sequence of operation and specifics of monitoring should be coordinated with the mechanical contractor. FOUR SEASONS HOTEL & RESORTS, VAIL COLORADO V31063 - Page 4 DRYER EXHAUST USING SUB DUCTS January 22, 2009 Revised January27, 2009 Conclusion The design of the proposed sub-ducted dryer exhaust system discussed above appears to meet the intent of the code and provides an equivalent level of life safety. However, one of the exhaust fan capacities must be increased to deliver the proposed volumetric flow design. The viability of this design is also heavily predicated on the regular maintenance of secondary lint traps. Please contact us if there are questions or concerns regarding this review. Yours truly, ROLF JENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Prepared by: Januarv 27, 2009 Sean Donohue, PE Date Senior Consultant SD/TD V31063\Vail Four Seasons- Dryer exhaust subduct 01-27-09 rev Todd Daily, PE Date Engineering Manager TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R090000142 Amount: $120.00 02/11/200910:39 AM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: LC Notation: credit card - Mark M. Reed Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 163,312.90 This Payment: $120.00 Total ALL Pmts: 163,312.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300, PLAN CK - project GFP012 120.00 C Transmittal F Revision Submittals: 1. "Field Set" of approved plans MUST accompany revi kons 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revise a 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are $55.00 per hour (2 hour mii Permit #(s) information applies to: Attention: F0,V Seaso,^S Vim.: mar~:h ~Aq%be-r ly x'01`1 Project Address: ( r, y a Contact Informatio Company: k S A ck%: A e c k s x r. c. Company Ph:°1'7D " 4'((,P - 78tic( Fax: Contact Name: J Oar N C••.~ s Contact Ph:%\3 O(oS Cell: E-Mail: \0--v \,\V-S. c . C_ o Town of Vail Contractor Registration No: X Cn-,, A Signat re (required) Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building $ Plumbing $ Electrical $ Mechanical $ Fire Sprinkler/Alarm $ Total $ LAY-Fo N & the Revisions Response to Correction Letter -attached copy of correction letter Deferred Submittal Other Description / List of Changes: S,~D k"Ea~ ~o- r'CV, L~j a~, k,-%__ veS.si"yt 4- ,-CA Wya? (use aooitionai sneet it necessary Date Rece e i i n n E J AN 2 2009 fill TOWN OF VAIL SAFEbuidtinc. COLORADO Building Department Services January 09, 2009 Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Description: Fire Resistive RE: PROJECT: PERMIT NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: INTERNAL REF ADDRESS: Dear Mr. Haeberle: Air Duct Wrap 4 Seasons B06-0196 25 9587 1 Vail Road OFFICE COPY 0Bo6-ot96 'REV 25 SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed the documents to review in accordance with the International Codes as adopted by the Town of Vail. This is approval for the 3M-15A wrap to be used on HVAC ducts per the listing and where shown on the approved plans. Some of the testing provided tests both 3M-20A and 3M-15A wrap. The 3M-20A is listed for grease ducts only. Plans: Description: 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A Product Literature ICC Evaluation Report #2161 Plan review fee: 2 hours = $120.00 No additional square footage- No added valuation Since John Plano Plans Examiner SAFEbuilt Colorado john.plano ttSAFEbuilt.com Page 1 of 1 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov B06-0196 Rev25 FAL.doc Submittal Transmittal Ship Via Hand Delivered Date 1/2/2009 To Martin Haeberle Town of Vail Chief Building Official Director of Community Dev. Vail CO 81657 Phone 970.479.2142 Fax Project Name Four Seasons Resorts - Vail Project Number 11247000 We are Transmitting Shop Drawings Samples El Product Data F,-/] Please review and return 1 copies Description Copies Submittal No. Description 4 07822-001 Fire Resistive Air Duct Wrap. 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A HEVIEWED BY FTBOc~ SAFEbuijt Colorado Remarks PRJ 03-0468, B06-0196. Please find attached four (4) copies of the Fire Resistive Duct Wrap that has been reviewed and approved by our Engineers, MMM. This is the product that was discussed with you in the meeting we held in October and we are submitting it to you for your review and comments. Please return one copy to myself at the HKS job site office with your review. Give me a call and I can pick up. Thanks. John H. Curtis, HKS Inc. Job site office: 970-476-7849; cell: 813-416-0687 1. li V HKS-Hill Glazier Studio r ,1+ JAN - 2 2009 Sent By John Curtis TOWN OF FAIL HI<S ~b~Gl~6 Pages 0 1R 9s8Z 1 • APPROVED Subject to Inspectnon and Comoliance to all felevani Adopted 'ffk- !'3 1un~c,ra~ Codes. Changes Wn Pl r,s NA(;S, by -•--roved. Date Z-9--of g.; Code SERE N rAlea1*p LeCm'11-1 fZC w..P i 1-t-A5 cl:r arS *7- M HI<S Submittal Transmittal Ship Via Overnight Date 11/20/2008 To Sity'Moussa MMM Group Limited . 100 Commerce Valley Drive West Thornhill Canada L3T0A1 Phone 905,882.1100 Fax 905.882.0055 Project Name Four Seasons Resorts - Vail Project Number 11247000 We are Tranamltting Shop Drawings n Samples F1 Product Data ✓ Please review and return 1 copies Description Copies Submittal No. Description 2 07822-001 Fire Resistive Air Duct Wrap. 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A Pages 0 Remarks This is tine submittal ,for theduct ;wrap~tp.be used=in placeof the 2 hour enclosure as discussed with the TOV last month. Please review and return. Thanks. SHOP DRAWING REVIEW PROJECT: FSHR Vail CO 3M Fire Protection Products- 'Fire Wrap' installation Details The review of t is drawing does not any way relieve the contractor of rssponaibllity for Its accuracy or for compliance with the contract documents REVIEWED I &A-"- No. HKS-Hill Glazier Studio Sent By John Curtis I GORREU-IMN 1 ow ANN% M M M GROUP INC Consulting Engineers 7380 Sand Lake Road, Suite 500, Orlando, FL 32819 t: 407-895-9535 1 f. 407-895-9534 c~ MMM GROUP • Project p ' - 0 Name: v , Project Zg6 a Submission # / The review of this drawing does not In any way relieve the contractor of responsibility for Its accuracy or for compliance with the contract documents ❑ Reviewed Mechanical Review Required Electrical Review Required El. Reviewed as Noted YES III` NO 17 YES ❑ NO ❑ ❑ Returned for Correction Review Date: 1S 08 Reviewed by: Review Date: Reviewed by: ~ Subject Title: Ftle Re-ve 4,'ko Ocvr~/ Date Received- ITEM COMMENTS MMM GROUP OF COMPANIES TORONTO - OTTAWA • CALGARY • EDMONTON - FORT MCMURRAY • VANCOUVER - KELOW14A • ORLANDO Layton Construction Company TRANSMITTAL Page: 1 oil 9090 South Sandy Parkway Sandy UT 84070 No. 06320.1033 USA PROJECT: Four Seasons Vail DATE: 11/19/2008 RE: FireResistive Air Duct Wrap TO: HKS FROM: 9090 South Sandy Parkway 1 Vail Road Sandy UT 84070 Vail CO 81657 PHONE: 970-476,7849 FAX: 970-476-7849 PHONE: 801.568.9090 FAX: 801-569-5451 NOTES: The attached submittal is fire resistive duct wrap for ventalation duct in place of 2 hour enclosure. This submittal is from Tom Miner with Division 7. PE n 13,)~I-t lM 7/ CC: Signed: Loren Dumont Item Package Code Rev. Copies Date Dascripdon Status Submittal 07822-001 2 11/19/2008 Fire Resistive Air Duct Wrap Out For Approval s !t..r 3fVi Fire Protection Products ENGINEERING JUDGMENT FOR: 11/10/08 John Coy White Cap Industries, Inc. 14900 E 39th Ave Aurora, CO 80011 Fax: (303) 373-5292 Project: Four Seasons Vail, Colorado Contractor: Layton Construction Fire Stopping Category: Wraps Hourly Rating Requested[Type: 1 and 2 Hour/ F Protected Item: HVAC Protected Iterr: Size: As per Applicable Intertek or UL Design Fire Barrier Material: Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A Special Conditions: Per figure 5 from 15A installation deck. Duct attached to bar stock which is hanging from concrete Application Details: To protectively wrap this application, install in accordance with Figure 5 of the 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A Installation Manual, with the following modifications: 1. The inclusion of this application with a ventilation duct should not adversely affect the performance of the protective wrap assembly, provided all other system parameters are met. 2. The practice of mechanically fastening the 2 in. wide steel bar stock to the bottom of the concrete floor assembly and installing pins spaced 8 in. on center onto the bar stock should provide adequate support for the assembly, provided welded pins are also installed on the vertical portion of the duct spaced 10-1/2 in. on center. A % in. bead of CP 25WB+ Sealant must be installed at the interface of the bar stock and the Duct Wrap 15A. 3. To firestop this application as the duct enters the shaft wall assembly, install in accordance with Intertek Design FS 565 W. Add an additional layer of Duct Wrap 15A 24 in. wide that is tightly butted to the firestop / shaft wall assembly and is pinned in position in accordance with the pinning requirements noted above. rM Fire Barrier Material: Duct Wrap 15A & CP 25WB+ Sealant I Based On: FS 565 W & 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A Installation Manual I This engineering judgment assumes the ducts are constructed to SMACNA guidelines for gauge and construction. The envelope design described above should achieve the hourly rating requested. This engineering judgment is based on performance results obtained in UL Systems, internal 3M fire tests and/or computer generated data using customer supplied details, which have been conducted in accordance to UL 1978 test criteria. Engineering Judgment Prepared e*_~ ) v Ernie Schmidt Senior Technical Service Engineer Reviewed By: 525602 cc: Brent Wagaman Rev. 1: ELS 11/10/08 Added shaft penetration John Coy Email: John.Coy@hdsupply.com SUBMITTED /L 1166 07922-0,0/ (DATE) (SUBMITTAL NUM.)' THIS REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL CONTRACT COMPLIANCE AND DOES NOT RELEASE THE SUBCONTRACTOR AND/OR SUPPLIER FROM COMPLYING TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND SUBCONTRACT 3M Building and Commercial Services Divisio%ND/OR PURCHASE-ORDER AGREEMENTS: NOR DOES THIS RELEASE 3M Center, Building 207-1S-02 THE ARCHITECTS OR CONSULTANTS FROM, THEIR CONTRACTUAL St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 RESPONSIBILITY. Page 1 of 1 CONTRACTORS SIGNATURE LAYTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC. 31J ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT NO. 55602 MODIFIED SYSTEM NO. FS 565 W REQUESTED F RATING - 1 & 2 HR CAN ONLY BE INSTALLED WHERE THERE IS NO FIRE DAMPER J 4 t- 4 5 .6 2 2 A 4 3 3 8 SECTION A-A 1. CONCRETE SLAB 7 2. DUCT 3. 1 LAYER FIRE BARRIER DUCT WRAP 15A 4. CP 25WB+ SEALANT 5. WELD PINS 6. BAR STOCK 7. SHAFTWALL ASSEMBLY 8. 4 PCF MINERAL WOOL CONSULT CURRENT INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORIES (UL, OPL) FOR SYSTEMS OR DESIGN DETAILS PROJECT: SYSTEM / DESIGN NO. PAGE DATE FOUR SEASONS VAIL, CO EJ525602 1 OF 1 11-11-08 DWG. LOCATION NAM SIGNATURE DATE 525602.DWG 0 11-11-08 ORIGINAL ISSUE BLF All otolemanto. technical riformotion nd NOT FOR USE AS reeommendalions contained herein orae based on tests REV DATE DESCRIPTION DRWN BY CONSTRUCTION we behave is be reliable. however. ainec the conditions DOCUMENT. of use and application are beyond our contra, 3m shall not be liable for any damage, direct or 3'N,4 _ DRAWING NOT eonsequonUal, resulting from the use or this material Fire Protection P 1 o du c tS TO SCALE. or design. 3M's only worranly, aholl be to replace any of our products proved to be defective 'k 3M ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT NO. 525589 MODIFIED SYSTEM NO. 3MU/FRD 120-06 REQUESTED F RATING - 1 HR 4 6 5 3 2 1 1. SHAFTWALL ASSEMBLY 2. DUCT 3. 4 PCF MINERAL WOOL 4. CP 25WB+ SEALANT 5. FIRST LAYER DUCT WRAP 15A 6. SECOND LAYER MIN. 24' DUCT WRAP 15A 7. BANDING CONSULT CURRENT INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORIES (UL, OPL) FOR SYSTEMS OR DESIGN DETAILS PROJECT: SYSTEM / DESIGN NO. PAGE DATE FOUR SEASONS VAIL, CO EJ525589 1 OF 1 1 1 -1 1 -08 DWG. LOCATION NAM SIGNATURE DATE 525589.DWG 0 11-11-08 ORIGINAL ISSUE BLF NOT FOR USE AS All statements, technical information and recommendations contained herein are based on tests REV DATE DESCRIPTION DRWN BY CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT. we believe to be reliable, however, since the conditions of use and application are beyond our control, 3M direct or dama e li ble for an ll t b h 3M Fire Protection Products DRAWING NOT TO SCALE. g , e y no a s a consequential, resulting from the use of this material or design. 3Ms only warranty shall be to replace any roved to be defective rodu ts f . p our p c o I 31N Fire Protection Products Project: Four Seasons Vail, Colorado Fire Stopping Category: Wraps Special Conditions: Per figure 5 from 15A installation details. Duct attached to bar stock which is hanging from concrete deck. Application Details: To protectively wrap this application, install in accordance with Figure 5 of the 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A Installation Manual, with the following modifications: 1. The inclusion of this application with a ventilation duct should not adversely affect the performance of the protective wrap assembly, provided all other system parameters are met. 2. The practice of mechanically fastening the 2 in. wide steel bar stock to the bottom of the concrete floor assembly and installing pins spaced 8 in. on center onto the bar stock should provide adequate support for the assembly, provided welded pins are also installed on the vertical portion of the duct spaced 10-1/2 in. on center. A % in. bead of CP 25WB+ Sealant must be installed at the interface of the bar stock and the Duct Wrap 15A. 3. To firestop this application as the duct enters the shaft wall assembly, install in accordance with Intertek Design FS 565 W. Add an additional layer of Duct Wrap 15A 24 in. wide that is tightly butted to the firestop / shaft wall assembly and is pinned in position in accordance with the pinning requirements noted above. 3M Fire Barrier Material: Duct Wrap 15A & CP 25WB+ Sealant Based On: FS 565 W & 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A Installation Manual This engineering judgment assumes the ducts are constructed to SMACNA guidelines for gauge and construction. The envelope design described above should achieve the hourly rating requested. This engineering judgment is based on performance results obtained in UL Systems, internal 3M fire tests and/or computer generated data using customer supplied details, which have been conducted in accordance to UL 1978 test criteria. Engineering Judgment Prepared By: Reviewed By: ' )Vtv e- 525602 t~ cc: Brent Wagaman Ernie Schmidt Rev. 1: ELS 11/10/08 Added shaft penetration Senior Technical Service Engineer John Coy Email: John.Coy@hdsupply.com 11/10/08 John Coy White Cap Industries, Inc. 14900 E 39th Ave Aurora, CO 80011 Fax: (303) 373-5292 Contractor: Layton Construction Hourly Rating Requested/Type: 1 and 2 Hour/ F Protected Item Size: As per Applicable Intertek or FFire Barrier Material: Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A 3M Building and Commercial Services Division 3M Center, Building 207-1 S-02 St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 Page 1 of 1 ~y 3M Fire Protection Products Project: Four Seasons Vail, CO Contractor: Layton Construction Fire Stopping Category: Pen Seals Hourly Rating Requested/Type: 1 Hour/ F Protected Item: Duct Protected Item Size: As per Intertek Design 3MU/FRD 120-06 Fire Barrier Material: Duct Wrap 15A Special Conditions: Shaft transition using Duct Wrap 15A Application Details: To protectively wrap this application, install in accordance with the following application details: 1. Install the firestop using CP 25WB+ Sealant in accordance with the applicable Intertek Design within the shaft wall assembly. 2. Install one layer of Duct Wrap 15A on the duct to butt to the firestop in accordance with the wrapping details contained within the applicable Intertek Design. 3. Add an additional layer of Duct Wrap 15A 24 in. wide that is tightly butted to the firestop / shaft wall assembly and is banded in position in accordance with the banding requirements of the applicable Intertek Design. 3M Fire Barrier Material: Duct Wrap 15A & CP 25WB+ Sealant Based On: 3MU/FRD 120-06 & FS 565 W Additional Referenced System(s): See attached drawing The fire stop design should achieve the hourly rating requested. This engineering judgment is based on performance results obtained in testing independent laboratory systems and or internal 3M fire tests, which have been tested in accordance to ASTM E814 (UL1479). Engineering Judgment Prepared By: Reviewed By: 525589 cc: Brent Wagaman Ernie Schmidt John Coy Email: John.Coy@hdsupply.com Senior Technical Service Engineer 3M Building and Commercial Services Division 3M Center, Building 207-1 S-02 St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 Page 1 of 1 Fire Protection Products ENGINEERING JUDGMENT FOR: 11/10108 John Coy White Cap Industries, Inc. 14900 E 39th Ave Aurora, CO 80011 Fax: (303) 373-5292 Project: Four Seasons Vail, Colorado Contractor: Layton Construction Fire Stopping Category: Wraps Hourly Rating Requested/Type: 1 and 2 Hour / F Protected Item: HVAC Protected Item Size: As per Applicable Intertek or UL Design Fire Barrier Material: Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A Special Conditions: Per figure 5 from 15A installation details. Duct attached to bar stock which is hanging from concrete deck. Application Details: To protectively wrap this application, install in accordance with Figure 5 of the 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A Installation Manual, with the following modifications: 1. The inclusion of this application with a ventilation duct should not adversely affect the performance.of the protective wrap assembly, provided all other system parameters are met. 2. The practice of mechanically fastening the 2 in. wide steel bar stock to the bottom of the concrete floor assembly and installing pins spaced 8 in. on center onto the bar stock should provide adequate support for the assembly, provided welded pins are also installed on the vertical portion of the duct spaced 10-1/2 in. on center. A % in. bead of CP 25WB+ Sealant must be installed at the interface of the bar stock and the Duct Wrap 15A. 3M Fire Barrier Material: Duct Wrap 15A & CP 25WB+ Sealant Based On: 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A Installation Manual This engineering judgment assumes the ducts are constructed to SMACNA guidelines for gauge and construction. The envelope design described above should achieve the hourly rating requested. This engineering judgment is based on performance results obtained in UL Systems, internal 3M fire tests and/or computer generated data using customer supplied details, which have been conducted in accordance to UL 1978 test criteria. Engineering Judgment Prepared By: Reviewed By: 1 525602 cc: Brent Wagaman Ernie Schmidt John Coy Email: John.Coy@hdsupply.com Senior Technical Service Engineer 3M Building and Commercial Services Division 3M Center, Building 207-1S-02 St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 Page 1 of 1 PENETRATING ITEM: A round or rectangular steel duct system constructed of min. 24 GA sheet steel with max. 720 inZ area and max. 30-in. dimension (max. dim. 24-in. x max. 30-in., or max diameter of 30 in.) and protected with a one layer of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A, such as detailed in GD 532 F or GD 548 F two layers of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A as detailed in GD 531 F or GD 547 F. FLOOR ASSEMBLY: The one-hour fire-rated floor assembly consists of min. 2 x 10 wood joists spaced a max. 18-1/2-in. O.C. with a min. 3/4-in. plywood attached to the unexposed side and one layer of 5/8 -in. Type X gypsum wallboard attached to the exposed side. Create an opening in the floor assembly having a max. cross-sectional area of 1083 inZ and a max dimension of 35-1/2-in. Position the duct assembly concentrically or eccentrically in the opening so that the annular space ranges from min. 1 in. on one side to max. 2-1/2-in. on the other. FILL, VOID OR CAVITY MATERIAL: Min. 3/4-in. depth of sealant fill material is to be applied over the recess in the packing material (4) on the top surface of the floor through-penetration opening. The sealant material applied flush with the top of the floor assembly. Listed Manufacturer: 3M - Firestopping Firestopping Sealants 3M Fire BarrierTm 2000+ Silicone Joint Sealant 3M Fire Barriefrm 1000 NS Silicone Joint Sealant 3M Fire Barriefm 1003 SL Silicone Joint Sealant PACKING MATERIAL: Fill the annular space with scrap 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A, 4 pcf mineral wool**. Cut the mineral wool into strips. Then compress it approximately 25% and insert it into the opening to fill the entire annular space. Completely fill the annular space and recess the surface of packing material a min. 3/4 in. from the top surface of the floor, as required to accommodate the necessary depth of caulk fill material. Listed with Intertek/Omega Point Laboratories) Listed Manufacturer: 3M- Insulation Mineral Wool Blanket 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 1 SA 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 20A 2 3. 4. N sZ D 2L N V N O L ri C V O O LL_ N E D L L_ O >O I C O a L N C N s O L I- This material was extracted and drawn by 3M Fire Protection Products from the 2006 Product Directory, lntertek/Omega Point Laboratories Inc Design No. FS 558 F August 1, 2003 FIRE PENETRATION SEAL Penetrating Item Steel Duct T Rating - l hr F Rating - I hr O fD n (D G Q N -I S O C t:Q S (D I CD Q O I N C Design No. FS 559 W August 1, 2003 FIRE PENETRATION SEAL Penetrating Item Steel Duct T-Rating-2 hr F-Rating-2 hr 1. PENETRATING ITEM: A round or rectangular steel duct system constructed of min. 24 GA sheet steel with max. 720 in' area and max. 30 in. width (max. dim. 24-in. x max. 30-in. or max. 30 in. diameter) and protected with a one layer of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A, such as detailed in GD 532 F or GD 548 F or two layers of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A as detailed in GD 531 F or GD 547 F. 2. GYPSUM WALL ASSEMBLY: A two-hour rated wall assembly constructed of the following: 25 GA galvanized steel studs spaced 18-1/2 in. o.c. measuring 3-5/8 in. wide with 1-1/4 in. legs. Studs attached with min. #6 x 3/8 in. steel stud framing screws to channel shaped floor and ceiling runners measuring 1/2-in. deep by 3-5/8-in. wide, which are secured to floor and ceiling with I-in. long fasteners, suitable for the mounting substrate, spaced max. 18-in. o.c. Studs and runners covered with two layers of 5/8 in. thick, Type X gypsum wallboard on each face. The base layer of gypsum wallboard fastened to steel studs with #6 1-1/8 in. bugle head phillips drywall screws spaced 12 in. o.c. The face layer of gypsum wallboard fastened with #6,1-5/8 in. long bugle phillips drywall screws spaced 8 in. o.c. Joint Tape and Compound - vinyl or casein, dry or premixedjoint compound applied to face layers of gypsum wallboard in two coats to all exposed screw heads and gypsum wallboard joints. A min. 2 in. wide paper, plastic or fiberglass tape embedded in first layer of compound over joints in gypsum wallboard. A min. wall depth of 6 in. created from face layer of gypsum wallboard to face layer of gypsum wallboard. Create an opening in the wall assembly having a max. 1118 in' cross-sectional area and a max. dimension of 35-1/2-in. Position the duct assembly concentrically or eccentrically in the opening so that the annular space ranges from min. I in. on one side to max. 3-1/2-in. on the other. 3. FILL, VOID OR CAVITY MATERIAL: Min. 5/8-in. depth of sealant fill material is to be applied to the recess over the packing material (4) on both sides of the through-penetration opening. The sealant material applied flush with the surface of the wall assembly on both sides. Listed Manufacturer: 3M - Firestopping Firestopping Sealants 3M Fire Barrieem 2000+ Silicone Joint Sealant 3M Fire BarrierT"I 1000 NS Silicone Joint Sealant 4. PACKING MATERIAL: Fill the annular space with scrap 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A, 4 pcf mineral wool**. Cut the mineral wool into strips. Then compress it approximately 25% and insert it into the opening to fill the entire annular space. Recess the surface of packing material a min. 5/8 in. from the surface of the wall, as required to accommodate the necessary depth of caulk fill material. Listed with Intertek/Omega Point Laboratories) Listed Manufacturer: 3M - Insulation Mineral Wool Blanket 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 20A This material was extracted and drawn by 3M Fire Protection Products from the 2006 Product Directory, Intertek/Omega Point Laboratories Inc www.3m.com/firestop O N n Z CD Q -I sO C CQ s CD 7 CD Q O I C) O n W CD 1. PENETRATING ITEM: A round or rectangular steel duct system constructed of min. 24 GA sheet steel with max. 720 in' area and max. 30-in. dimension (max. dim. 24-in. x max. 30-in., or max. 30 in. diameter) and protected with a one layer of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A, such as detailed in GD 532 F or GD 548 F or two layers of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A as detai led in GD 531 F or GD 547 F The 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A was abutted to each side of th- penetration seal. 2. FLOOR ASSEMBLY: The two-hour fire-rated floor assembly consists of min. 4-1/2 in. thick normal weight (100-150 pef) reinforced concrete. Create an opening in the floor assembly having a max. cross-sectional area of 891 in' and a max. dimension of 33-in. Position the duct assembly concentrically or eccentrically in the opening so that the annular space ranges from min. 1 in. on one side to max. 2 in. on the other. 3. FILL, VOID OR CAVITY MATERIAL: Min. 3/8-in. depth of sealant fill material is to be applied to the recess around the top surface of the floor through-penetration opening. The fill material is in direct contact with the steel duct. The sealant material overlapped the concrete a nom. 1/4-in. Listed Manufacturer: 3M - Firestopping Firestopping Sealants 3M Fire Barrierr" 2000+ Silicone Joint Sealant 3M Fire Barrier""' 1000 NS Silicone joint Sealant 3M Fire Barrier""' 1003 SL Silicone Joint Sealant 4. PACKING MATERIAL: Fill the annular space with scrap 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A, or 4 pcf mineral wool**. Cut the mineral wool into strips. Then compress it approximately 25% and insert it into the opening to fill the entire annular space. Fill the slab depth with packing material and recess the surface of packing material a min. 3/8 in. from the top surface of the floor, as required to accommodate the necessary depth of caulk fill material. Listed with Intertek/Omega Point Laboratories) Listed Manufacturer: 3M - Insulation Mineral Wool Blanket 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 20A This material was extracted and drawn by 3M Fire Protection Products from the 2006 Product Directory, Intertek/Omega Point Laboratories Inc.® Design No. FS 561 F August 1, 2003 FIRE PENETRATION SEAL Penetrating Item Steel Duct T-Rating - 2 hr F-Rating- 2 hr 'v O N n fD G fl N s O C CS? T (D CD Q O I n O n CD (D 1. PENETRATING ITEM: A round or rectangular steel duct system constructed of min. 24 GA sheet steel with max. 720 in' area and max. 30-in. dimension (max. dim. 24-in. x max. 30-in., or max. 30 in. diameter) and protected with a one layer of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A, such as detailed in GD 532 F or GD 548 F or two layers of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A as detailed in GD 531 F or GD 547 F The 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A was abutted to each side of the penetration seal. 2. WALL ASSEMBLY: The two-hour fire-rated wall assembly consists of min. 4-1/2 in. thick normal weight (100-150 pcf) reinforced concrete or concrete blocks. Create an opening in the wall assembly having a max. cross-sectional area of 33-in. Position the duct assembly concentrically or eccentrically in the opening so that the annular space ranges from min. 1 in. on one side to max. 2 in. on the other. 3. FILL, VOID OR CAVITY MATERIAL: Min. 3/8-in. depth of sealant fill material is to be applied over the packing material (4) on both sides of the wall. The sealant material overlapped the concrete a nom. 1/4-in. Listed Manufacturer: 3M - Firestopping Firestopping Sealants 3M Fire Barrieff" 2000+ Silicone Joint Sealant 3M Fire BarrierT"' 1000 NS Silicone Joint Sealant 4. PACKING MATERIAL: Fill the annular space with scrap 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A, or 4 pcf mineral wool". Cut the mineral wool into strips. Then compress it approximately 25% and insert it into the opening to fill the entire annular space. Recess the surface of packing material a min. 3/8 in. from both surfaces of the wall, as required to accommodate the necessary depth of caulk fill material. Listed with Intertek/Omega Point Laboratories) Listed Manufacturer: 3M- Insulation Mineral Wool Blanket 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 20A This material was extracted and drawn by 3M Fire Protection Products from the 2006 Product Directory, Intertek/Omega Point Laboratories Inc.® Design No. FS 563 W August I, 2003 FIRE PENETRATION SEAL Penetrating Item Steel Duct T -Rating - 2 hr F-Rating-2 hr Design No. 3NW/FRD 120-07 (Perviously DESIGN NO. GD 538 F) April 15,2008 GREASE DUCT PROTECTION 3M Company 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A UL 1978 (June 25, 2002) Section 12 Temperature Test - Pass Section 13 Abnormal Temperature Test - Pass ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria for Grease Duct Enclosure Systems (AC101) Section 4.5 Fire-Engulfment Test (ASTM E 119 Exposure) - 2 hr = Compressed Area betWeen Wrapped Pieces B f 1. GREASE DUCT: Continuously welded, liquid-tight L-shaped rectangular duct system with horizontal and vertical shafts constructed of 16 GA sheet steel with a maximum 1440 inch' area and a maximum 48 inch dimension. When required, equip the duct with a pre-fabricated access door (Item 6) or field fabricated access door (Item 7). A. Construct the duct using sections affixed to each other with welded seams. B. Reinforce the duct to IMC or NFPA 96 requirements designed to carry the weight of the grease duct assembly covered with insulation under a fire load equivalent to UL 1978 exposure and the ASTM E 119 time-temperature curve. C. Rigidly support the duct in accordance with IMC or NFPA 96 requirements or as specified in Item 5. D. Protect the annular space around the duct passing through a fire rated wall assembly with an Intertek certified, compatible, 3M, penetration firestop system having the same fire rating as the wall assembly. 2. FASTENERS: Weld minimum 12 GA, 4-1/2-inch long, copper-coated steel insulation pins or 12 GA insulated cup head pins to the grease duct (Item 1). Match fastener method with corresponding insulation (Item 4) method. A. Compression Butt Joint: Locate pins at all blanket overlaps, on all sides of the grease duct (item 1), and meet the following requirements. 1. Space pins maximum 12 inches apart in rows across the width of grease duct (Item 1). Locate pins maximum 6-3/4 inches from the edges of the grease duct (Item 1). Refer to Section view A-A. II. Space the rows of pins maximum 10 inches apart along the length grease duct (item 1). Where pieces of insulation (Item 4A) are butted together, space edge pins of the insulation (Item 4A) a maximum 2 inches apart. Refer to Section view B-B. III. After insulation (Item 4A) is installed, place minimum 2.5 in. x 2.5 in. square, galvanized steel, self locking washer clips onto all insulation pins. TV. After clips are installed, cut off or bend flush with insulation (Item 3) pins that are too long. B. Butt Joint with Collar: Locate pins at all blanket overlaps, on all sides of the grease duct (Item 1), and meet the following requirements. 1. Space pins maximum 12 inches apart in rows across the width of grease duct (Item 1). Locate pins maximum 6-3/4 inches from the edges of the grease duct (Item 1). Refer to Section view A-A. This material was extracted and drawn by 3M Fire Protection Products from thr 2008 Product Directory, a Intertek Q N X N LL V D 0 23 L I~ 4C Section B-B: Single End Overlap (Telescope) Design No. 3MU/FRD 120-07 continued T II. Space the rows of pins maximum 10-1 /2 inches apart along the length grease duct (Item 1). Where pieces of insulation (Item 4B) are (D overlapped, space pins a maximum 1-1/2 inches from the edge of the insulation. Refer to Section view B-B. X 111. After insulation (Item 4B) is installed, place minimum 2.5 in. x 2.5 in. square, galvanized steel, self locking washer clips onto all insulation pins. (D IV After clips are installed, cut off or bend flush with insulation (Item 4B) pins that are too long. C. Single End Overlap (Telescope): Locate pins at all blanket overlaps, on all sides of the grease duct (Item 1), and meet the following Q requirements. 1. Space pins maximum 12 inches apart in rows across the width of grease duct (Item 1). Locate pins maximum 6-3/4 inches from the edges of the grease duct (Item 1). Refer to Section view A-A. H. Space the rows of pins maximum 10-1/2 inches apart along the length grease duct (Item 1). Where pieces of insulation (Item 4C) are butted together, space pins a maximum 1-1/2 inches from the edge of the insulation. Refer to Section view B-B. III. After insulation (Item 4C) is installed, place minimum 2.5 in. x 2.5 in. square, galvanized steel, self locking washer clips onto all insulation pins. N After clips are installed, cut off or bend flush with insulation (Item 4C) pins that are too long. D. Dual End Overlap (Checkerboard): Locate pins at all blanket overlaps, on all sides of the grease duct (Item 1), and meet the following requirements. Q I. Space pins maximum 12 inches apart in rows across the width of grease duct (Item 1). Locate pins maximum 6-3/4 inches from the C edges of the grease duct (Item 1). Refer to Section view A-A. rt ! 11. Space the rows of pins maximum 10-1/2 inches apart along the length grease duct (Item 1). Where pieces of insulation (Item 4D) are butted together, space pins a maximum 1-1 /2 inches from the edge of the insulation. Refer to Section view B-B. III. After insulation (Item 4D) is installed, place minimum 2.5 in. x 2.5 in. square, galvanized steel, self locking washer clips onto all insulation pins. N After clips are installed, cut off or bend flush with insulation (Item 4D) pins that are too long. 3. BANDING: Not applicable to Item 2A. Option to fasteners Items 2B, 2C and 2D. After insulation (Item 4) is installed, apply minimum 1 /2 inch wide, 0.015-inch thick stainless steel bands and secured with minimum 1-inch long stainless steel crimp clamps. When needed to ease installation, use filament tape as a temporary hold for the insulation (item 4) prior to banding. Place banding a maximum 1-1/2 inches from all insulation (Item 4) edges and a maximum of 10-1/2 inches on center (O.C-). Tension the banding to hold the insulation (Item 4) itrplace without cutting or damaging the insulation (Item 4) or grease duct (Item 1). 4. CERTIFIED MANUFACTURER: 3M Company CERTIFIED PRODUCT: 3M Fire Barrier"" Duct Wrap MODEL: 15A INSULATION: Apply one layer of nominal 1-1/2-in. thick, 8-pcf blanket, made of mineral wool fibers and fiberglass, encapsulated with foil scrim over the entire surface of the grease duct (Item 1). Use blanket, available in various widths, that is fully encapsulated or single faced with a polypropylene/foil scrim. Expose the foil faced side of insulation to view. Wrap one layer of insulation around the grease duct (Item 1) circumference so that each terminating end of insulation overlaps onto the starting end of insulation a minimum of 3 inches at all transverse joints. Alternate the transverse overlap location so that no two consecutive adjacent overlaps align. Refer to Section view A-A for transverse overlap section view. Cover all visually exposed ends and edges of insulation with nominal 4-inch wide pressure-sensitive aluminum foil tape. A. Compression Butt Joint: Refer to 4A section view B-B. Wrap the grease duct (Item 1) with one layer of insulation installed with G) compression butt joints at all longitudinal joints. Compress each end of each piece of insulation together and butt to preceding edge of insulation. Each piece of installed insulation width is 2 inches less than insulation nominal width. (Example: each piece of nominal 24- (D inch wide insulation when installed is 22-inches wide.) Install insulation with zero clearance at the surface and mating edges, or in the (A field between overlaps. Verify all insulation buttjoints are a minimum i-1/2 inches in overall thickness. at compression butt joints. (D B. Butt Joint with Collar: Refer to 4B section view B-B. Wrap the grease duct (Item I) with one layer of insulation installed with buttjoints at all longitudinal joints. Butt each end of each piece of insulation together with preceding edge of insulation. Each piece of installed e insulation width is its nominal width. (Example: each piece of nominal 24-inch wide insulation when installed is 24-inches wide.) Install insulation with zero clearance at the overlaps, or in the field between overlaps. Place and center 6-inch wide collar of insulation over the buttjoint. Overlap 6-inch wide collar onto each adjacent insulation 3-inches. Verify all insulation buttjoints with collars are a minimum 3 inches in overall thickness. C. Single End Overlap (Telescope): Refer to 4C section view B-B. Wrap the grease 'uct (Item 1) with one layer of insulation installed with 3-inch minimum overlaps at all longitudinal joints. Overlap each adjacent insulation edge with the edge of the next piece of insulation. Install insulation with zero clearance at the overlaps, or in the field between overlaps. Verify all insulation overlaps are nominally 3 inches in overall thickness. 1. Starting at one end of the grease duct (Item I apply the first piece of insulation around the grease duct (Item I ) to overlap fasteners (Item 2C). Refer section viewA-A. II. Position and overlap the leading edge of the second piece of insulation nominally 3 inches over the flush edge of the first piece of insulation. Place the opposite edge of the second piece of insulation flush against the surface of the grease duct (Item 1). An "S- shaped" cross section of the insulation is created. Refer to 4C section view B-B. III. Apply all additional pieces of insulation as "S-shaped" cross section of the insulation in compliance with Item 4CII. D. Dual End Overlap (Checkerboard): Refer to 4D section view B-B. Verify all insulation overlaps are a minimum 3 inches in overall thickness. Do not align two consecutive insulation end overlaps. Overlap each full width insulation edge with the edge of the "gull wing" (-v) shaped piece of insulation. Install insulation with zero clearance at the overlaps, or in the field between overlaps. Verify all insulation overlaps are nominally 3 inches in overall thickness. This material was extracted and drawn by 3M Fire Protection Products from the 2008 Product Directory, 0Intertek Design No. 3MU/FRD 120-07 continued 1. Wrap the first piece of insulation around the ventilation duct (Item 1) so that the insulation is flush against the surface of the ventilation duct (Item 1). Position the starting end of the insulation to overlap pins (Item 2A) a minimum of 1-1/2 inches while the edges of the insulation overlap the rows of pins (Item 213) a minimum of 1-1/2 inches. IT. Position the second piece of insulation nominally 18 inches from the edge of the first piece of insulation. Install the second piece in the same manner as the first. III. Cover the ventilation duct (Item 1) that is exposed between the edges of the first two pieces of insulation with another piece of insulation. Position the starting end of the insulation to overlap pins (Item 2A) a minimum of 1-1 /2 inches while the edges of the insulation overlap the adjacent edges of the two pieces installed insulation a minimum of 1-1 /2 inches. SUPPORTS: Support the grease duct (Item 1) with insulation (Item 4) using a "trapeze" system composed of a minimum 2 x 2 x 1/4-inch steel angle as the trapeze cross-member and minimum 3/8-inch diameter rods. Connect all-thread steel rods (insulation (Item 4) not required) to the trapeze cross-member using nuts and washers. Connect the all-thread steel rods to the bottom of the floor assembly using an attachment method designed to carry the weight of the grease duct (Item 1) with insulation (Item 4) under a fire load equivalent to ASTM E 119 time- temperature curve. Place one all-thread steel rod 2 inches from each end of trapeze cross-member. Center grease duct (item 1) with insulation (Item 4) on trapeze cross-member. Space all-thread steel rods a maximum 6 inches frorr surface of the insulated grease duct. Extend trapeze cross-member at least 2-inches past each all-thread steel rod. Space trapeze supports a maximum 60 inches O.C. 6. CERTIFIED MANUFACTURER: 3M Company CERTIFIED PRODUCT: 3M Fire Barrierr" Grease Duct Access Door MODELS: 000-51115-16584-9 (20 x 20),000-51115-16583-2 (12 x 8), and 00051115-16582-5 (10 x 6) ACCESS DOORASSEMBLY: (Not shown) When required, apply an access door and insulated cover plate as described: A. OPTIONAL PRE-FABRICATED ACCESS DOOR: Mark a clean-out access opening location on the grease duct (Item 1) with insulation (Item 4) at its mid-height along the horizontal section. Cut an opening (maximum 22 x 22 inches) in the insulation (Item 4) 2 inches larger than the outside dimension of the pre-fabricated access door (maximum 20 x 20 inches). Remove and discard the cut insulation (Item 4). Cut an opening (maximum 20 x 20 inches) into the side of the grease duct (Item 1) according to the manufacturer's instructions for the size of the pre-fabricated access door to be installed. Install and tightly secure the pre-fabricated access door in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions to the grease duct (Itern 1). Pre-fabricated access door fitted with four 3/8 inch diameter corner thumb bolts through the exterior face. B. CERTIFIED MANUFACTURER: 3M Company CERTIFIED PRODUCT: 3M Fire Barrier" Duct Wrap MODEL: 15A ACCESS INSULATION: (Not Shown) Remove the four corner 3/8 inch diameter thumb bolts and replace them with four 3/8 inch diameter all-thread steel rods extending from pre-fabricated access door (Item 6A). Apply 2 layers of access insulation over the pre- fabricated access door (Item 6A) as follows. Cut the first piece of access insulation a minimum 1/4-inch larger than the clean-out access opening. Position, square and impale the first piece of the access insulation over the four 3/8 inch diameter all-thread steel rods extending from pre-fabricated access door (Item 6A). Press the first piece of access insulation flush over the pre-fabricated access door (Item 6A). Compress and abut the cut edges of the first piece of the access insulation against the cut edges of opening in the insulation (Item 4). Cut a second piece of access insulation a minimum of 2 inches larger than first piece of access insulation on all sides. Seal cut edges of the second piece of access insulation with nominal 4 inch wide aluminum foil tape. Position, square and impale the second piece of the access insulation over the four 3/8 inch diameter all-thread steel rods extending from pre-fabricated access door (Item 6A). Press the second piece of access insulation flush over first piece of access insulation. C. COVER PLATE: Cut a cover plate to the same dimensions as the second piece of access insulation (Item 613) using a minimum 16 GA steel sheet. Drill holes in the cover plate that match the location of the four 3/8 inch diameter all-thread steel rods and locate the holes so that the cover plate is squared to the second piece of access insulation (Item 6B). After both layers of access insulation (Item 613) are impaled over the four 3/8 inch diameter all-thread steel rods install the cover plate. Pass the four 3/8 inch diameter all-thread steel rods through the cover plate. Place washers and wing nuts onto each of the four 3/8 inch diameter al 1-thread steel rods. Secure the cover plate by tightening wing nuts. OPTIONAL FIELD FABRICATED ACCESS DOORS: (Not shown) Mark a clean-out access opening location on the grease duct (Item 1) with insulation (Item 4) at its mid-height along the horizontal section. Use either option A or B. A. (OPTION A) Cut a 13x13-inch opening in the insulation (Item 4). Remove and discard the cut insulation (Item 4). Cut a IN 10-inch opening into the side of the grease duct (Item 1) maintaining a I-inch clearance around the perimeter of the opening and the cut insulation (Item 4). Remove and discard the cut steel. Weld four 4 x 1/4-inch all-thread rods to the grease duct (Item 1). Locate one at each corner of the grease duct (Item 1) so that they are 11-in O.C and squared within the insulation (Item 4) opening. 1. ACCESS DOOR: Cut a 13x13 inch 16 GA steel plate to be used as an access door. Drill clearance holes in the access door to match the all-thread steel rod pattern. Place the access door over the all-thread steel rods. Seal the opening in the grease duct (Item 1) by overlapping the access door over the opening cut in the insulation (Item 4) by 1-1/2-inches on all sides. Weld four 6-1/2-inch long, 12 GA copper-coated steel insulation pins to the access door corners so that the pins are 9-inches O.C. 11. CERTIFIED MANUFACTURER: 3M Company CERTIFIED PRODUCT: 3M Fire Barrier" Duct Wrap N Q N X (D V D C a) N v L V MODEL: 15A ACCESS INSULATION: Apply two layers of access insulation over the access door. Cut the first piece of access insulation into a 13x 13-inch square and install it over the insulation pins and covering the access door (Item 7AI). Cut the second piece of access insulation into a 15x15 inch square. Square it to and install it over the insulation pins. Cover the first piece of access insulation so that a 1-inch overlap exists. Secure blanket to pins with 1-1/2-inch square or round, galvanized or stainless steel speed clips. Turn down or cut off insulation pins that extend beyond the second piece of access insulation. Place steel tubing over each all-thread steel rods. Apply washers and wing nuts over the all-thread steel rods. Secure the access door by tightening the wing nuts. This material was extracted and drawn by 3M Fire Protection Products from the 2008 Product Directory, 0 Intertek Design No. 3MU/FRD 120-07 continued B. (OPTION B) Cut a maximum 16x16 inch opening into the insulation (Item 4) and the grease duct (Item 1). Remove and discard the cut T insulation (item 4) and steel. Weld together 4 pieces of 1-1/2x1-1 Ax 1/8 inch steel angle to form a flanged frame. The narrow frame edge X is welded to the visual surface of the grease duct (item 1) at the perimeter of the opening that positions the 1-1/2-inch flange 1-1/4 inches X s off the grease duct (item 1). The flange extends away from the opening. Weld four minimtun 4-inch long 1/4 inch diameter all-thread steel (D rods to the flange. Locate one each in the center of each comer. ` I. ACCESS DOOR: Cut a 18-1 /2x 18-1 /2-inch 16 GA steel plate to be used as an access door. Drill clearance holes in the access door to 2 match the all-thread steel rod pattern on the flange. Place the access door over the all-thread steel rods. Q 11. COVER PLATE: Cut an external cover plate 20-1/2x20-1/2-inch out of 16 GA steel and drill clearance holes matching the locations of the all-thread on the flange. Weld minimum four 12 GA copper coated steel impaling pins onto the internal surface of the cover plate, spaced minimum 14 inches O.C. Install access insulation (Item 713II1) Position the coverplate with access insulation over the all-thread steel rods flush to access door. Apply washers and wing nuts over the all-thread steel rods. Secure the access door by tightening the wing nuts. III. CERTIFIED MANUFACTURER: 3M Company CERTIFIED PRODUCT: 3M Fire Barrim:"' Duct Wrap MODEL: 15A ACCESS INSULATION: Apply two layers of access insulation over the interior of the cover plate. Cut the first piece of access insulation into a 20-1/2x20-1/2-inch square and install it over the insulation pins on the internal surface of the cover plate. Cut the second piece of access insulation into a 24x24-inch square. Square it to and install it over the insulation pins. Cover the first piece of C access insulation so that a 3-1/2-inch overlap exists. Secure blanket to pins with 1-1 /2-inch square or round, galvanized or stainless y. steel speed clips. Turn down or cut off insulation pins that extend beyond the second piece of access insulation. (D Q Ln (D U C n This material was extracted and drawn by 3M Fire Protection Products from the 2008 Product Directory, ®Intertek J IPwww.3m.com/tirestop '~'~i ' ' Design No. VAD 529 F VENTILATION DUCT PROTECTION Type - Duct A Stability - 2 hr Insulation - 2 hr Integrity - 2 hr Dual End Overlap (Checkborad) A J L-1- 1 Single End Overlap (Telescope) Duct Surface w•.e.s•swsr~~'+en Duct Surface Butt Joint with Collar L Duct Surface SECTION A-A 1. VENTILATION DUCT: An airtight duct system with horizontal shafts constructed of min. 20 GA sheet steel with a max. 1440-in. area and a max. 60-in. width (max. 24-in. high x max. 60-in. wide). When required, equip the duct with a reducer section. Construct the duct using sections affixed to each other with seams. Reinforce the duct to IMC or SMACNA requirements designed for a 2-in. WC under pressure and to carry the weight of the ventilation duct assembly covered with insulation under a fire load equivalent to ISO 834 time-temperature curve. Rigidly support the duct in accordance with IMC or SMACNA requirements or as specified in Item 5. Protect the annular space around the duct passing through a fire rated barrier with a penetration firestop system as detailed in one of the following Designs: FS 565 W, FS 566 W, FS 567 W, FS 568 W, FS 569 W, FS 570 W, FS 571 W, FS 572 W, FS 573 F AND FS 574 F. 2. INSULATION: Use two layers of nom. 1-1/2-in. thick nom. 8-pcf blanket made of mineral wool fibers and fiberglass strands. Wrap the steel duct with two layers of duct wrap installed with 3-in. min. overlaps at all joints. Use blanket that is fully encapsulated, or single faced. Expose the faced side of fully encapsulated or single faced blanket to view on outer layer. All joints on the first layer of blanket were overlapped a min. of 3-in. (2a). All joints on the second layer were overlapped a min of 3 in. Stagger the first and second layer overlaps half the distance from the edge of the first layer or nom. 12 in. All cut edges on both layers were covered with nom. 4-in. wide pressure-sensitive aluminum foil tape. One alternate to the above insulation method includes encapsulating (sometimes called a cocoon wrap) the trapeze cross-member supports and the all-thread steel rods up to the top of the duct system at which point the all-thread rods penetrate the insulation and are un- insulated. Another alternate method would be for the all-thread rods to penetrate the ventilation duct (1) and the insulation (2). After the all-thread rods penetrate the insulation (2), they are an-insulated. Reference Product Section of this Directory for more details. Listed Manufacturer: 3M- Insulation Mineral Wool Blanket 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A 3. FASTENERS: Use either pins or banding or both. Pinning Option: Weld min. 12 GA, min. 4 in. long, copper-coated steel insulation pins to the duct. Pins shall be located at all longitudinal blanket overlaps on the duct and meet the following requirements. Space pins in rows across the duct max. 8-in. apart. The pins in the longitudinal rows are max. 10-1/2-inch o.c. All overlaps are a minimum of 3-in. for circumferential This material was extracted and drawn by 3M Fire Protection Products from the 2006 Product Directory, Intertek/Omega Point Laboratories Inc.® N Q a L Q) V N O L V C O i3 c Design No. VA.D 529 F continued overlaps going around the duct and do not require pins. The longitudinal overlaps are to be alternated such that no two consecutive overlaps ' are aligned. The blanket is locked into place over the pins with minimum 1.5 in. x 1.5-in. square, or 1.5-in. diameter round, galvanized steel, O speed clips or cup head pins. Insulation pins that extend beyond the outer blanket wrap layer shall be turned down to eliminate sharp edges or n the excess length cut off. When banding is used and the ducts are greater than 24-in. wide, install pins at all longitudinal blanket overlaps on the bottom of the duct and meet the following requirements. Space pins in rows across the duct max. 12-in. apart. The pins in the longitudinal (D rows are max. 10-1 /2-inch o.c. 4. BANDING: Banding Option: Use min. 1/2-in. wide 0.015-in. stainless or min. 1/2-in. 0.020-in. carbon steel bands and secured with Q minimum I -in. long stainless steel crimp clamps. The use of filament tape as a temporary hold for the insulation prior to banding to ease installation is permitted. Place the bands a max. 1.5 in. from each blanket edge and a max. of 10.5 in. o.c.. Tension the banding material to rn hold the insulation (2) in place without causing any cutting or damage to the blanket or duct. 5. SUPPORTS: Support the insulated duct using one of the fol lowing methods. Use a minimum 1-1 /2 x 1-1 /2 x 1/4-in. steel angle as the trapeze cross-member supports that are connected to min. 3/8-in. all-thread steel rods, which do not have to be insulated. The rods can be placed against the insulation or have a max, clearance from the insulation of 6-in. Space supports a max. 54-in, o.c. Alternate to support methods include encapsulating the trapeze cross-member supports and the all-thread steel rods up to the top of the duct system at which point the all- thread rods penetrate the insulation (2) and are uninsulated. fD O C n -r This material was extracted and drawn by 3M Fire Protection Products from the 2006 Product Directory, Intertek/Omega Point Laboratories Inc J • Q C ose option or TAX ON DEMAND www.3m.com/firestop Design No. VAD 530 F VENTILATION DUCT PROTECTION Type - Duct A Stability - 2 hr Insulation - 2 hr Integrity - 2 hr Dual End Overlap (Checkborad) f A J Single End Overlap (Telescope) Duct Surface -1-- - Duct Surface Butt Joint with Collar Duct Surface SECTION A-A 1. VENTILATION DUCT: An airtight duct system with horizontal shafts constructed of min. 24 GA sheet steel with a max. 400-in. area and a max. 40-in. width (max. 10-in. high x max. 40-in. wide). When required, equip the duct with a reducer section. Construct the duct using sections affixed to each other with seams. Reinforce the duct to IMC or SMACNA requirements designed for a 2-in. WC under pressure and to carry the weight of the ventilation duct assembly covered with insulation under a fire load equivalent to ISO 834 time-temperature curve. Rigidly support the duct in accordance with IMC or SMACNA requirements or as specified in Item 5. Protect the annular space around the duct passing through a fire rated barrier with a penetration firestop system as detailed in one of the following Designs: FS 565 W, FS 566 W, FS 567 W, FS 568 W, FS 569 W, FS 570 W, FS 571 W, FS 572 W, FS 573 F AND FS 574 E 2. INSULATION: Use two layers of nom. 1-1/2-in. thick nom. 8-pcf blanket made of mineral wool fibers and fiberglass strands. Wrap the steel duct with two layers of duct wrap installed with 3-in. min. overlaps at all joints. Use blanket that is fully encapsulated, or single faced. Expose the faced side of fully encapsulated or single faced blanket to view on outer layer. All joints on the first layer of blanket were overlapped a min. of 3-in. (2a). All joints on the second layer were overlapped a min of 3 in. Stagger the first and second layer overlaps half the distance from the edge of the first layer or nom. 12 in. All cut edges on both layers were covered with nom. 4-in. wide pressure-sensitive aluminum foil tape. One alternate to the above insulation method includes encapsulating (sometimes called a cocoon wrap) the trapeze cross-member supports and the all-thread steel rods up to the top of the duct system at which point the all-thread rods penetrate the insulation and are un- insulated. Another alternate method would be for the all-thread rods to penetrate the ventilation duct (1) and the insulation (2). After the all-thread rods penetrate the insulation (2), they are un-insulated. Reference Product Section of this Directory for more details. Listed Manufacturer: 3M- Insulation Mineral Wool Blanket 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A FASTENERS: Use either pins or banding or both. Pinning Option: Weld min. 12 GA, min. 4 in. long, copper-coated steel insulation pins to the duct. Pins shall be located at all longitudinal blanket overlaps on the duct and meet the following requirements. Space pins in rows across the duct max. 8-in. apart. The pins in the longitudinal rows are max. 10-1/2-inch o.c. All overlaps are a minimum of This material was extracted and drawn by 3M Fire Protection Products from the 2006 Product Directory, Intertek/Omega Point Laboratories Inc." Q a L 3 N V tD O L V O a c VAU ASV r • I OT L moose opnon y Tor n top Design No. VAD 530 F continued 3-in. for circumferential overlaps going around the duct and do not require pins. The longitudinal overlaps are to be alternated such that no two consecutive overlaps are aligned. The blanket is locked into place over the pins with minimum 1.5 in. x 1.5-in. square, or 1.5-in. diameter 0 round galvanized steel, speed clips or cup head pins. Insulation pins that extend beyond the outer blanket wrap layer shall be turned down C to eliminate sharp edges or the excess length cut off. When banding is used and the ducts are greater than 24-in. wide, install pins at all longitudinal blanket overlaps on the bottom of the duct and meet the following requirements. Space pins in rows across the duct max. 12-in. (D apart. The pins in the longitudinal rows are max. 10-1/2-inch o.c. 4. BANDING: Banding Option: Use min. 1/2-in. wide 0.015-in. stainless or min. 1/2-in. 0.020-in. carbon steel bands and secured with minimum 1-in. long stainless steel crimp clamps. The use of filament tape as a temporary hold for the insulation prior to banding to ease installation is permitted. Place the bands a max. 1.5 in. from each blanket edge and a max. of 10.5 in. o.c.. Tension the banding material to v. hold the insulation (2) in place without causing any cutting or damage to the blanket or duct. 5. SUPPORTS: Support the insulated duct using one of the following methods. Use a minimum 1-1/2x 1-1 /2 x 1/4-in. steel angle as the trapeze cross-member supports that are connected to min. 3/8-in. all-thread steel rods, which do not have to be insulated. The rods can be placed against the insulation or have a max. clearance from the insulation of 6-in. Space supports a max. 54-in. o.c. Alternate to support methods include encapsulating the trapeze cross-member supports and the all-thread steel rods up to the top of the duct system at which point the all- thread rods penetrate the insulation (2) and are uninsulated. (D Q O O C n Design No. FRD-3 October 21, 2005 (Fire Resistance Ratings) Stability, Integrity and Insulation - 1 & 2 h (See Items 3 and 6) F RESTOPSYSTEM HRESTOP SYSTEM FIRESTOP SYSTEM OFFUN A OPTIONS OFT: ON C Fire Protection Products This material was extracted by 3M Fire f Protection Products from the 2006 ULC Fire Resistance Directory @ FLOOR V IEW Maximum Size of Duct - 1.2 m2 maximum area with no dimension exceeding 2.1 m. For ducts penetrating combustible floor/ceiling assemblies, maximum area 0.62m2 with no dimension exceeding 1.22 m. Support Spacing - 1 500 mm maximum. Duct Use Limitation - Duct is intended for use in pressurization situations or maximum negative pressure 300 Pa within duct. 1. Masonry Wall or Floor - Minimum depth or thickness as necessary for the grade of fire separation but not less than 115 mm. Normal-density or low-density concrete. Wall can also be constructed of nominal 190 mm thick concrete block laid up with mortar. OR (a) Wall Assembly - The fire-rated gypsum wallboard and steel or wood stud assembly shall be constructed of the materials and in the manner described in the individual Wall or Partition design in the ULC List of Equipment and Materials, Fire Resistance Ratings. OR (b) Floor/Ceiling Assembly - The fire-rated combustible floor/ceiling assembly shall be constructed of the materials and in the manner described in the individual Floor-Ceiling design in the ULC List of Equipment and Materials, Fire Resistance. 2. Ventilation Air Duct - Duct to be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Standard for the Installation of Air Conditioning and Ventilation Systems, NFPA 90A, 1993 Edition. Minimum base metal thickness of 0.58 mm galvanized steel; maximum size of duct 600 mm by 2 100 mm nominal (1.2 m2 maximum area with no dimension exceeding 2.1 m). For ducts with any dimension greater than 1 000 mm, a 38 mm by 38 mm by 3 mm thick transverse stiffening angle, approximately 50 mm less than the maximum dimension, shall be screw attached 204 mm OC to the duct, 76 mm beyond the top surface of floor and both surfaces of wall. • 3. Duct Insulation - (Guide No. 40 U21.9) (HNNZC). "3M FireMaster Duct Wrap", 38 mm thick, Calcium-Magnesium-Silicate (CMS) duct wrap installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions and shall include the following features: (a) Copper-coated steel insulation pins (not shown), nominal 3 mm thick, minimum 102 mm long, shall be stud-welded to the bottom surface of steel duct on horizontal runs and on the widest surface on vertical runs of the steel duct at 305 mm OC maximum. For ducts 305 mm by 305 mm or smaller, no insulation pins are required. (b) The performance rating of the duct assembly penetrating a masonry floor or gypsum wall assembly is dependent on the number of layers of duct w:ap. The Stability, Integrity and Insulation Rating of a wrapped duct penetrating a combustible floor/ceiling assembly is maximum 1 h, independent of the number of layers of wrap. The "3M FireMaster Duct Wrap" material is installed using one of the options described below: Fire Protection Products This material was extracted by 3M Fire F 4 / , f 04(1 Protection Products from the 2006 ULC U L f Fire Resistance Directory OPTION A (i) For 1 h rating, one layer of "3M FireMaster Duct Wrap" shall be installed around the duct with a perimeter and longitudinal overlap of minimum 76 mm. All joints shall be staggered minimum 267 mm. (ii) For 2 h rating, a second layer of duct wrap is installed over the first layer with overlapping joints staggered minimum 267 mm. All single and double layer joints are to be covered with minimum 102 mm wide or two layers of 76 mm wide aluminum tape overlapped to form a width of 102 mm. The layer(s) of blanket are locked into place over the insulation pins with 25 mm by 25 mm galvanized steel speed clips. Banding material (Item 6), 13 mm wide and minimum 0.3 mm thick, shall be installed with a tensioning tool and spaced at maximum 267 mm OC. (iii) The layer(s) of blanket are locked into place over the insulation pins with 25 mm by 25 mm galvanized steel speed clips. Banding material (Item 6), 13 mm wide and minimum 0.3 mm thick, shall be installed with a tensioning tool and spaced at maximum 267 mm OC. OPTION B (i) For 1 h rating, one layer of 38 mm thick "3M FireMaster Duct Wrap" shall be installed around the duct, with perimeter and longitudinal joints overlapped minimum 76 mm. All joints to be taped with pressure sensitive aluminum foil, 102 mm wide, or two layers of 76 mm wide aluminum tape overlapped to form a width of 102 mm with an overlap of 50 mm over each side. (ii) For 2 h rating, the first layer of "3M FireMaster Duct Wrap" shall be installed around the duct with the perimeter and longitudinal joints butted tightly together and held in place with tape. A second layer of "3M FireMaster Duct Wrap" shall be installed over the first layer with perimeter and longitudinal joints overlapped minimum 76 mm. All joints to be taped with pressure sensitive aluminum foil, 102 mm wide, or two layers of 76 mm wide overlapped to form a width of 102 mm with an overlap of 50 mm over each side. (iii) The layer(s) of blanket are locked into place over the insulation pins with 25 mm by 25 mm galvanized steel speed clips. The duct wrap shall be secured to the duct using banding material (Item 6), 13 mm wide and minimum 0.3 mm thick, installed with a tensioning tool and spaced at maximum 267 mm OC. OPTION C (i) For 1 h rating, one layer of 38 mm thick "3M FireMaster Duct Wrap", shall be installed around the duct, with perimeter joints butted tightly and longitudinal joint overlapped minimum 76 mm. All joints to be taped with pressure sensitive aluminum foil, 102 mm wide, or two layers of 76 mm wide aluminum tape overlapped to form a width of 102 mm with an overlap of 50 mm over each side. (ii) For 2 h rating, the first layer of "3M FireMaster Duct Wrap", shall be installed around the duct with the perimeter and longitudinal joints butted tightly together and held in place with aluminum tape. A second layer of "3M FireMaster Duct Wrap" shall be installed over the first layer with perimeter joints butted tightly. The longitudinal joints are overlapped minimum 76 e Protection Products This material was extracted by 3M Fire 4 , ~~f 1 Protection Products from the 2006 ULC 4 4 Fire Resistance Directory 4(,IA mm. All joints to be taped with pressure sensitive aluminum foil, 102 mm wide, or two layers of 76 mm wide overlapped to form a width of 102 mm with an overlap of 50 mm over each side. (iii) The layer(s) of blanket are locked into place over the insulation pins with 25 mm by 25 mm galvanized steel speed clips. 3M FireMaster Duct Wrap", minimum 204 mm wide, shall be installed as collars over each of the perimeter joints. "3M FireMaster Duct Wrap" collar shall be installed with a longitudinal overlap of minimum 76 mm and shall overlap each side of joint by minimum 102 mm. The collars and duct wrap shall be secured to the duct using banding material (Item 6), 13 mm wide and minimum 0.3 mm thick, installed with a tensioning tool and located 50 mm from the edges of each collar (two per collar) and at maximum 267 mm OC. 3M COMPANY 4. Support Rod - Steel-threaded rod, nominal 13 mm minimum diameter, or for ducts not exceeding 254 mm by 1 000 mm (0.25 m2 maximum area with no dimension exceeding 1 000 mm), steel threaded rod of nominal 10 mm diameter threaded through Cradle (Item 5) and mounted to concrete floor by: (a) Passing through pre-drilled hole and bolting with nut and washer on top of floor, or (b) Carbon steel or stainless steel masonry anchors, nominal 13 mm or 10 mm diameter by 50 mm long drop-in style anchors embedded a minimum of 50 mm into concrete, or nominal 13 mm or 10 mm diameter stud wedge/expansion type anchors embedded a minimum of 60 mm into concrete. 5. Cradle - Steel angle, 50 mm by 50 mm by 5 mm used to support wrapped duct at 1 500 mm OC maximum. Hung from concrete floor with Support Rods (Item 4). For ducts not exceeding 254 mm by 1 000 mm (0.25 m2 maximum area with no dimension exceeding 1 000 mm) steel angle, 38 mm by 39 mm by 4 mm, or UniStrut® P2000 channel can be used with nominal 10 mm threaded rod (Item 4). As an option, the cradle assembly can be encased within the duct (cocoon wrap) during the installation of "3M FireMaster Duct Wrap" (Item 3). To encase the cradle support, the duct wrap is slit maximum 152 mm to allow for the threaded rod. A generous application of ULC labelled "3M Fire Barrier CP-25 WB+ Caulk" (Item 9) is applied along the seam. The seam is taped over with minimum 76 mm wide aluminum tape. Additional material is installed such that a crown of minimum 13 mm is formed around the circumference of the threaded rod. When the overlap wrap method (Item 3, Option A) is used, the adjacent duct wrap to the threaded rod must be installed with enough overlap to cover the seam. If the butted joint method (Item 3, Option B) is used, "3M Fire Master Duct Wrap" collar must be installed to cover the seam. 6. Steel Band - Nominal 13 mm wide, 0.3 mm thick, made of carbon or stainless steel for 1 h rated systems, and stainless steel for 2 h rated systems installed on wrapped duct with tensioning tool. 3M Fire Protection Products This material was extracted by 3M Fire ! I ~ ! Protection Products from the 2006 ULC Fire Resistance Directory Firestop System Installation The duct shall be installed within the opening such that the annular space between the wrapped duct (for Firestop Option A), or steel duct (for Firestop Option B), and the edges of the opening is maximum 76 mm. For installations in gypsum wallboard assemblies, the opening to accommodate the duct shall be framed on all sides using lengths of stud installed between vertical studs and secured to the vertical studs. For installations in combustible floor/ceiling assemblies, only Option C shall be used. The maximum and minimum annular spaces shall be 82 and 22 mm respectively. The opening to accommodate the duct shall be framed on all sides using lengths of nominal 38 mm by minimum 240 mm wood joists. Firestop System Installation Option A (Duct Wrap Continuous Through Non-Combustible Floor or Combustible or Non- Combustible Wall Opening) 7(a). Firestop Insulation - "3M FireMaster Duct Wrap" or ULC labelled mineral wool insulation with minimum 64 kg/m3 density compressed 50% minimum and installed into the opening to a minimum depth of 100 mm. Material to be recessed 6.4 mm from top surface of floor or both surfaces of wall to allow for the installation of sealant (Item 7b). 7(b). Firestop System Component - (Guide No. 40 U19.13). Type "3M Fire Barrier 2000 or 2000+" silicone sealant or "3M Fire Barrier CP25WB+" caulk applied over insulation (Item 7a) to a minimum depth of 6.4 mm flush with top surface of floor or symmetrically to both surfaces of wall. Or Type "3M Fire Barrier 1003" self-levelling silicone sealant for horizontal penetrations only applied to a minimum depth of 6.4 mm flush with the top surface of floor slab. 3M COMPANY Option B (Duct Wrap Terminated at Non-Combustible Floor or Combustible or Non-Combustible Wall Opening) 8(a). Firestop Insulation - "3M FireMaster Duct Wrap" or ULC labelled mineral wool insulation with minimum 64 kg/m3 density compressed 50% minimum and installed into the opening to a minimum depth of 100 mm. 3M Fire Protection Products =Resistance ted by 3M Fire 4 00 , f , the 2006 ULC ry For floor assemblies, the insulation is installed to full depth of floor and butted tightly against the duct wrap at the bottom surface of floor. The insulation is recessed 6.4 mm from the top surface of floor to allow for the installation of sealant (Item 8b). For vertical applications, the insulation material is recessed 6.4 mm from both surfaces of wall to allow for the installation of sealant (Item 8b). . 8(b). Firestop System Component - (Guide No. 40 U 19.13) (XHJZC). "Type 3M Fire Barrier 2000 or 2000+" silicone sealant or "3M Fire Barrier CP25WB+" caulk applied over insulation (Item 8a) to a minimum depth of 6.4 mm flush with top surface of floor or symmetrically to both surfaces of wall. Or Type "3M Fire Barrier 1003" self-levelling silicone sealant for horizontal penetrations only applied to a minimum depth of 6.4 mm flush with the top surface of floor slab. Additional sealant to be installed around the interface of duct wrap to ensure that no gap exists between sealant and duct wrap material. 3M COMPANY Option C (Duct Wrap Continuous Through Combustible Floor/Ceiling Opening) 9(a). Firestop Insulation - "3M FireMaster Duct Wrap" or ULC labelled mineral wool insulation with minimum 48 kg /M3 density compressed 50% minimum and installed into the opening to a minimum depth of 240 mm. Material to be recessed from surface of floor and of ceiling to accommodate required thickness of sealant (Item 9b). • 9(b). Firestop System Component - (Guide No. 40 U19.13) (XHJZC). - Type "3M Fire Barrier CP-25WB+ Caulk" applied over insulation (Item 9a) to a minimum depth of 32 mm flush with top surface of floor and to a minimum depth of 16 mm, flush with surface of ceiling. 3M COMPANY • 10. Firestop System Component- Component (not shown) -(Guide No. 40 U19.13). Type "3M Fire Barrier CP-25 WB+ Caulk", applied in a generous bead along seam for the installation of duct wrap around cradle assembly (Item 5), in "cocoon wrap" applications if cradle penetrates the wrap Additional material to be applied to form a crown of minimum 13 mm around the circumference of the threaded rod. 3M COMPANY Last Updated on 2006-09-14 3M Fire Protection Products This material was extracted by 3M Fire / Protection Products from the 2006 ULC Fire Resistance Directory BusinesslRegional Office ■ 5360 Workman Mill Road, Mfttier, CaGfomia 90601 ■ (562) 69MW ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Regional Office ■ 900 Montclair Road, Suite A, Birmingham, Alabama 35213 ■ (205) 599-9800 WWW.ICC~eS.Orq>) Regional Office ■ 4051 West Flossmoor Road, Country Club Hills, Illinois 60478 ■ (708) 799-2305 Legacy report on the BOCA® National Building Code/1999 and the 1998 International Mechanical Code® 21-61 S'w LEGACY REPORT Reissued January 1, Zoos DIVISION: 07-THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION Section: 07815-Flexible Blanket Fireproofing REPORT HOLDER: 3M FIRE PROTECTION PRODUCTS 3M CENTER, BLDG. 207-1S-02 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55144-1000 (651) 733-0580 www.3m.com/firestop EVALUATION SUBJECT: 3MTM FIRE BARRIER DUCT WRAP 15A EVALUATION SCOPE: Compliance with the following codes: BOCA' National Building Code/1999 ■ Section 704.1.1 Fireresistance ratings ■ Section 106.4 Alternative materials and equipment ■ Section 803.2 Classification ■ Section 704.4.1.1 Elementary materials 1998 International Mechanical Code® ■ Section 302.1 Penetrations of floor/ceiling assemblies and fire-resistance-rated assemblies ■ Section 308.3 Protective assembly construction and installation ■ Section 308.4 Allowable reduction ■ Section 308.5 Labeled assemblies DESCRIPTION 3M Tm Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A is a nonasbestos, inorganic fiber, flexible blanket composed primarily of silica with a nominal density of 8 Ib/ft3 (128 kg /M3) that is completely encapsulated in a foil scrim material intended to prevent the absorption of grease or water condensation by the fiber blanket. The wrap is manufactured in a thickness of 1.5-inch (38 mm) with roll sizes of 20 feet (508 mm) long and roll widths of 24 and 48 inches (610 and 1219 mm). In addition to Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A, the following accessories are used for the complete installation of the duct wrap system. ■ Tape: Filament tape, a minimum 0.75-inch-wide (19.1 mm) is used to temporarily secure each layer of the duct wrap in place prior to installation of steel banding. Aluminum foil tape is used to seal cut edges of a blanket. ■ Steel Banding: Carbon steel, 0.5-inch-wide-by-0.015-inch- thick (12.7 mm by 0.39 mm) with carbon steel banding clips is used to secure the duct wrap in the final position. ■ Insulation Impaling Pins: 12 gauge, copper-coated mild steel, 5 inches (127 mm) in length which are welded to the duct surface and used to secure the duct wrap in place. The insulation is secured on the pins by 1.5-by-1.5-inch-square (38 by 38 mm) or 1.5-inch-diameter (38 mm) galvanized steel speed clips. ■ Grease Duct Access Door Hardware: Hardware for installation of the duct wrap to grease duct access doors consists of insulation impaling pins described above, 0.25- inch-diameter-by-4.5- to 5-inch-long (6.4 mm by 114 to 127 mm) steel threaded rods welded to the duct at corners of the access door openings, 0.25-inch (6.4 mm) wing nuts with 0.25-inch (6.4 mm) steel washers and 4-inch-long (102 mm) hollow steel tubing to fit threaded rods. See Figure 3. ■ Through-penetration Firestop System: Component materials of the through-penetration firestop system are 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A, a packing material and a sealant as shown in Figures 4A through 4D. The packing material consists of 4 Ib/ft3 (1.8 kg/m3) mineral wool, or scrap pieces of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A blanket with a in nominal in place thickness of 4.0 inches (101.6 mm). Sealant consists of 3M Fire Barrier 1000 N/S Silicone Sealant with a minimum installed thickness of 0.25-inch (6.4 mm). USE AND APPLICATION 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A is intended for use as • An alternative to a one- or two-hour fireresistance rated shaftenclosure for kitchen grease ducts and HVAC ducts, and a A method for reducing required clearances to combustible materials. 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A used as an alternative to a shaft enclosure or as a means of reducing clearances to combustibles is installed in direct contact with the exterior surface of the grease duct to be enclosed. Every portion of the duct surface is protected with one layer of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A material applied in tandem with a 3-inch (76 mm) overlap. The horizontal and longitudinal joints of each layer are overlapped by a minimum of 3 inches (76 mm). As an alternative to the overlap method, 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A may also be installed with the ends of the wrap butted tightly together and covered with a layer of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A, centered over the butt joint with a minimum of 3-inch (76 mm) overlap on each side of the joint. See Figures 1 and 2. ICC-E'S legacy reports are not to be construed as representing aesthetics or any otherattribuies not specifically addressed, nor are they to be construed as on endorsemem ofthe subject ofthe report or a recommendation for its use. There is no warranty by ICC 8roluation Sen•ice, Inc., express or implied, as to anyfinding or other matter in this report, Oros to any product covered by the report. Copyright m 2008 Pagel of 7 M___ n -S 7 21-61 The duct wrap materials are held in place temporarily with filament tape prior to the installation of the steel banding. As an alternative to the fastening with banding, a pin installation technique is permitted. See Figure 2. Where the width of the duct to be protected exceeds 24 inches (610 mm), insulation impaling pins are welded to the duct and the duct wrap is impaled on these pins and held in place with steel speed clips. See Figure 2. Horizontal and vertical duct support members are not required to be wrapped with the duct wrap material when the support system consists of a minimum 0.375-inch-diameter (9.5 mm) steel rods and 2-by-2-by-025-inch-thick (51 by 51 by 6.4 mm) steel support angles. Grease duct access doors at horizontal cleanouts, as required by and located in accordance with the 19981nterna- tional Mechanical Code®, shall be protected with two layers of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A. Each succeeding layer shall overlap the previous layer by a minimum of 1-inch (25.4 mm). The wrap is installed on insulation impaling pins welded to the access door and secured with speed clips. See Figure 3 at the end of this report for a diagram of a typical grease duct access door installation. Through-penetration Firestop System Penetrations of fireresistance rated floor/ceiling or wall assemblies by grease ducts protected with 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A shall be protected by one of the through- penetration firestop systems described in this report and as shown in Figures 4A through 4D. CONDITIONS OF USE This report is limited to the applications and products as stated in this report. The ICC-ES Subcommittee on National Codes intends that the report be used by the code official to determine that the report subject complies with the code requirements specifically addressed, provided thatthis product is installed in accordance with the following conditions: ■ 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A shall be installed in accor- dance with the manufacturer's published installation instruc- tions titled 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A Commercial Kitchen Grease Duct Fire Protection System, subject to the conditions of this report. ■ Use of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A as an alternative to a one-ortwo-hourfireresistance rated shaft enclosure shall be limited to kitchen grease ducts and HVAC ducts constructed of a minimum nominal thickness of 0.028-inch (0.71 mm) (No. 24 Gage) steel. ■ 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A used as an alternative to a one-ortwo-hour fireresistance rated shaft enclosure shall be installed in a one layer wrap application as illustrated in Figures 1 and 2 at the end of this report. ■ Use of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A as a means of reducing clearance to combustibles to zero is limited to ducts constructed of a minimum nominal thickness of 0.028-inch [(0.71 mm) (24 gage)] steel, with a maximum dimension of 30 inches (762 mm) and a maximum cross-sectional area of 720 inz (464515 mmz). ■ 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A shall extend for a minimum distance of 36 inches (914 mm) beyond the edge of the combustible material when the duct wrap is used for zero- clearance to combustible installations, when the entire length of the duct is not completely wrapped. ■ The through-penetration firestop system, in conjunction with 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A, is limited to penetrations of fireresistance rated floor or wall assemblies by kitchen grease ducts and HVAC ducts. Where the duct enclosed with 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A penetrate a fireresistance rated assembly, the perimeter of the penetration shall be protected by the through-penetration firestop system as follows: 1- or-2-Hour Through-Penetration Firestop System- 4'/Z inch (114 mm) Concrete Floor Assembly • Duct construction: Steel, minimum nominal thickness of 0.055-inch [(1.4 mm) (No. 16 gage)]. • Duct Size: Maximum 24-by-24-inch (610 by 610 mm). • Annular space: Maximum 3-inch (76 mm) between wrap and edge of opening, filled with a through-penetration firestop system as illustrated in Figure 4A. • Floor construction: Reinforced lightweight concrete [nominal density of 105 to 120 Ib/ft3 (1682 to 1923 kg/m3)] with a minimum thickness of 4.5 inches (114 mm). 1- or 2-Hour Through Penetration Firestop System- 4'/Z inch (114 mm) Concrete Floor Assembly • Duct construction: Steel, minimum nominal thickness of 0.028-ir,„h (0.71 mm) (No. 24 Gage). • Duct Size: Maximum 24-by-30-inch (610 by 762 mm). • Annular space: Maximum 2.5-inch (64 mm) between wrap and edge of opening, filled with a through-penetration firestop system as illustrated in Figure 4A. • Floor construction: Reinforced lightweight concrete [nominal density of 105 to 120 Ib/ft3 (1682 to 1923 kg /M3) with a minimum thickness of 4.5 inches (114 mm). 1- or 2-Hour Through-Penetration Firestop System- 4'/2-inch (114 mm) Concrete Floor or Wall Assembly • Duct construction: Steel, minimum nominal thickness of 0.028-inch [(0.71 mm) (No. 24 gage)]. • Duct Size: Maximum 24-by-30-inch (610 by 762 mm). • Annular space: Maximum 2-inch (51 mm) between wrap and edge of opening, filled with a through-penetration firestop system as illustrated in Figure 4B. • Floor/Wall construction: Reinforced lightweight concrete with a minimum thickness of 4.5 inches (121 mm). 1-Hour Through-Penetration Firestop System- Fireresistance-Rated Wood/Gypsum-Floor/Ceiling Assembly • Duct construction: Steel, minimum nominal thickness of 0.028-ir,zh [(0.71 mm) (No. 24 gage)]. • Duct Size: Maximum 24-by-30-inch (610 by 762 mm). • Annular space: Maximum 2.5-inch (64 mm) between wrap and edge of opening, filled with a through-penetration firestop system as illustrated in Figure 4C. • Floor/Ceiling construction: 2-by-10-inch (51 by 254 mm) wood joists spaced 18.5 inches (470 mm) on center in the vicinity of the through-penetration area. One layer of 5/e inch (15.9 mm) Type X gypsum wallboard on the underside and sides of the floor assembly. The top side of the floor assem- bly consists of 3/4 inch-thick (19.1 mm) plywood. 1-Hour Through-Penetration Firestop System-Metal Stud Wall Assembly • Duct construction: Steel, minimum nominal thickness of 0.028-inch [(0.71 mm) (No. 24 gage)]. • Duct Size: Maximum 24-by-30-inch (610 by 762 mm). Panes 3 of 7 21-61 • Annular space: Maximum 3.5-inch (89 mm) between wrap and edge of opening, filled with a through-penetration firestop system as illustrated in Figure 4D. • Wall construction: 35/8 inch (86 mm) 25 gage steel studs spaced 18.5 inches (470 mm) on centerwith a single layer of %-inch-thick (15.9 mm) Type X gypsum wallboard mounted to both sides of the wall frame. 2-Hour Through-Penetration Firestop System-Metal Stud Wall Assembly • Duct construction: Steel, minimum nominal thickness of 0.028-inch [(0.71 mm) (No. 24 gage)]. • Duct Size: Maximum 24-by-30-inch (610 by 762 mm). • Annular space: Maximum 3.5 inches (89 mm) between wrap and edge of opening, filled with athrough-penetration firestop system as illustrated in Figure 4D. • Wall construction: 35/,-inch (86 mm) 25 gage steel studs spaced 18.5 inches (470 mm) on center with two layers of % -inch-thick (15.9 mm) Type X gypsum wallboard mount- ed to both sides of the wall frame. ■ Where 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A is used as an altema- tive to a fireresistance rated shaft enclosure, and the support framing does not meet the criteria stated in this report, all horizontal and vertical support members for the duct shall be completely wrapped with one layer of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A. ■ Installations where ducts enclosed with 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A penetrate a floor assembly other than those listed in this report are outside the scope of this report and shall be protected in accordance with the requirements of Section 710.0 of the BOCA" National Building Code/1999. ■ Installations where the 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A enclosure of air ducts penetrates a floor assembly other than listed in this report, and which do not connect more than two stones, shall be provided with a fire damper installed at the floor line in accordance with the requirements of Section 714.2.5 of the BOCA' National Building Code/1999. ■ This report is subject to penodicre-examination. For informa- tion on the current status of this report, contact the ICC-ES. ITEMS REQUIRING VERIFICATION The following items are related to the use of the report subject, but are not within the scope of the evaluation. These items are related to determination of code compliance forthe structure on which the subject is used. ✓Construction and installation of grease ducts and HVAC ducts comply with the applicable provisions of the 1998 International Mechanical Code. INFORMATION SUBMITTED ■ Omega Point Laboratories, Project No. 9006-107779, dated November 13, 2000, containing results of large-scale wall fire testing of 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A, performed in accordance with ASTM E 119. ■ Omega Point Laboratories, Project No. 9006-107651, dated October 12, 2000, containing results of full-scale engulfment and through-penetration firestop system testing of the 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A system. ■ Omega Point Laboratories, Project No. 9006-107275, dated October 31,2000, containing results of testing performed in accordance with ASTM E 136. ■ Omega Point Laboratories, Project No. 9006-107650, dated October 16, 2000, containing results of UL 1978, Standard for Grease Ducts. ■ Omega Point laboratories, Project No. 9006-107952, dated November 17, 2000, containing results of testing performed in accordance with ASTM E 84. ■ Omega Point Laboratories, Project No. 9006-108123, dated November 29, 2000, containing results of testing performed in accordance with ASTM C 411. ■ Omega Point Laboratories, Project No. 9006-108560A, dated April 4, 2001, containing results of testing performed in accordance with ASTM E 814. ■ Omega Pont Laboratories, Project No. 9006-1085606, dated April 6, 2001, containing results of testing performed in accordance with ASTM E 814. ■ Omega Point Laboratories, Project No. 9006-108560C, dated March 29, 2001, containing results of testing per- formed in accordance with ASTM E 814. ■ Omega Point Laboratories, Project No. 9006-108560D, dated April 3, 2001, containing results of testing performed in accordance with ASTM E 814- • Omega Point Laboratories, Project No. 9006-108560E, dated April 5, 2001, containing results of testing performed in accordance with ASTM E 814. ■ Quality Control Manual, OPL Document No. 16338-1,2 & 3 Revision b, dated May 2001, containing signatures of the manufacturer and the labeling agency Omega Point Labora- tories, and procedures related to inspection and labeling of the duct wrap. ■ Manufacturer's published installation instructions, titled 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A Commercial Kitchen Grease Duct Fire Protection System Product Data and Installation Instructions. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT To aid in the determination of compliance with this report, the following represents the minimum level of information to accompany the application for permit: ■ The language "See ICC-ES Report No. 21-61" or a copy of this report; ■ All ducts proposed to be protected; ■ Fireresistance rating(s) required and provided; ■ Type and material of all ducts to be protected; ■ Size(s) and nominal thickness of all ducts to be protected; ■ Details of duct hangers and/or supports; ■ Location and details of all grease duct access doors; ■ Location(s) of duct penetrations through both fireresistance and nonfirereistance rated assemblies; ■ Construction and requires firesistance rating of the assem- blies penetrated; ■ Detail(s) of fireresistance and nonfireresistance rated assembly penetrated and of the proposed through-penetra- tion firestop system; and ■ Specifications for handling, storage and installation of all system components. PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION All 3M Fire Protection System Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A, or the packaging, manufactured in accordance with this report shall bear the following identification: ■ "See ICC-ES Report No. 21-61." ■ A label stating the product name and the mark of the labeling agency, Omega Point Laboratories, Inc. Page 4 of 7 21-61 FIGURE 1A - 3M FIRE BARRIER DUCT WRAP 15A COMMERCIAL KITCHEN GREASE DUCT SYSTEMS 1 or 2 Hour Shaft Alternative Zero Clearance to Combustibles Telescoping Wrap Technique with Banding For Ducts 24 inches (60,9 cm) or Less t 1 2 I _ J, !iJ ~i 1 ~f(lem' I 3g I.~(b c X53 3 Y' 1 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A 2 Steel Banding'/2 inch (13 mm) Wide Min. Typical 3 3-inch (76 mm) Min. Longitudinal Overlap 4 3-inch (76 mm) Min. Perimeter Overlap FIGURE 1B -TELESCOPING OVERLAP WRAP FIGURE 1 D -BUTT JOINT WITH COLLAR OPTION CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW OPTION CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW 6" (152 mm) 3" (76 mm) r3" (76 mm) - I-1/2- (38 mmJ J?r., 3. _~1/2" (38 mm) 3~ (76 mm)r ! ! 1-1/2" (38 mmTr - 1-1/2" (38 I I.2~ 1 21 (53.3 cm) Typ ~I lei - ` = (51 FIGURE 1C - CHECKERBOARD OVERLAP WRAP OPTION CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW 3- (76 mm),`~ ~3" (76 mm) 1-1/2" (38 my)~I2r. I-1/Z" (38 mm) I I I ~ I 21" (53.3 cm) Typ. ~i 1 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A 2 Steel Banding '/z inch (13 mm) Wide Min. Typical 3 3-inch (76 mm) Min. Longitudinal Overlap 4 3-inch (76 mm) Min. Perimeter Overlap 5 t 6-inch (152 mm) Wide Collar Made From 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A 6 Firmly Butted Joint 21-61 Page 5 of 7 FIGURE 2A- 3M FIRE BARRIER DUCT WRAP 15A COMMERCIAL KITCHEN GREASE DUCT SYSTEMS 1 or 2 Hour Shaft Alternative Zero Clearance to Combustibles Telescoping Wrap Technique with Weld Pins Only P "-1 ) 13) 1 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A 2 11/2 inch Square or 11/2inch Dia. Galvanized Speed Clips 3 3-inch (76 mm) Min. Longitudinal Overlap 4 3-inch (76 mm) Min. Perimeter Overlap FIGURE 2B - TELESCOPING OVERLAP WRAP FIGURE 2D - BUTT JOINT WITH COLLAR OPTION OPTION CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW 6" (152 mm) 3" (76 mm)~~ J3" (76 mm) 3" (76 mm r 1-7/2'• (38 m ~z•, n Lr 11 -1/2•' (38 mm) 1-1/2" (38 mm) i _~1-1/2" (38 mm) % 1'* (53.3 cm) Typ. FIGURE 2C - CHECKERBOARD OVERLAP WRAP OPTION CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW 3" (76 mm) _ 3" (76 mm) 1-1/2" (38 mm)r ~ ~Z ~ 1-1/2" (38 mm) - Wit- 21" (53,3 cm) Typ. r~ - 1 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A 2 11/2 inch Square (38 mm) or 1112-inch lips 3 3-inch (76 mm) Min. Longitudinal O 4 h (76 mm) Min. Perimeter Ove 3-inc 5 6-inch Wide Collar Made 6 Firmly Butted Joint 21-61 Page 6 of 7 FIGURE 3-3M FIRE BARRIER DUCT WRAP 15A COMMERCIAL KITCHEN GREASE DUCT SYSTEMS 1 or 2 Hour Access Door System 1 Access Hole 2 '/4 inch (6 mm) Dia. All Threaded Rods 3 Access Cover -16 Gauge 4 Insulation Pins -Welded 5 First Layer 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A Cut Same Size As Cover 6 Second Layer 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A with 1-inch (25 mm) Overlap On All Sides 7 Speed Clips 8 Aluminum Tape Covering All Exposed Edges 9 Spool Pieces For Threaded Rods 10 inch (6 mm) Diameter Wing Nuts 6 FIGURE 4A-3M FIRE BARRIER DUCT WRAP 15A COMMERCIAL KITCHEN GREASE DUCT SYSTEMS 1 or 2 Hour Through Penetration Systems 4'12 inch (11,4 cm) Concrete Floor or Wall -717 J3-(76 ; 30__ 361 (76 t , (3A) FIGURE 4B-3M FIRE BARRIER DUCT WRAP 15A COMMERCIAL KITCHEN GREASE DUCT SYSTEMS 1 or2 Hour Through Penetration Systems 4'/Z-inch (11,4 cm) Concrete Floor or Wall _ iii--- 1 J3° (76 MM) (3Cl- i it 3B)~ )3" (76 MM) \ I: l 1 Floor/Ceiling or Wall Assembly 2 Duct 3A One Layer 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A 3B Banding or Pinning 3C Packing Material 3D 3M Fire Barrier 1000 N/S Silicone sealant- For Wall Assembly Apply Sealant To Both Side of Wall mm) MM) 1 Floor/Ceiling or Wall Assembly 2 Duct 3A One Layer 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A-Terminated on Each Side of Floor or Wall Penetration 3B Banding or Pinning 3C Packing Material 3D 3M Fire Barrier 1000 N/S Silicone Sealant - For Wall Assembly Apply Sealant To Both Side of Wall Page 7 of 7 FIGURE 4D-3M FIRE BARRIER DUCT WRAP 15A COMMERCIAL KITCHEN GREASE DUCT SYSTEMS 1 or 2 Hour Through Penetrations Systems Fire-Rated Steel/Gypsum Wallboard s FIGURE 4C-3M FIRE BARRIER DUCT WRAP 15A COMMERCIAL KITCHEN GREASE DUCT SYSTEMS 1 Hour Through Penetration Systems Fire-Rated Wood/Gypsum - Floor/Ceiling Assembly (2 . - 3A) l3D) j -C I 1 F , ~3" (76 mm) I . --1 3" (76 mm) 1 Fire-rated Floor/Ceiling Assembly 2 Duct 3A One Layer 3M Fire Barrier Dud Wrap 15A 3B Banding or Pinning 3C Packing Material 3D 3M Fire Barrier 1000 N/S Silicone Sealant FIGURE 5-3M FIRE BARRIER DUCT WRAP 15A COMMERCIAL KITCHEN GREASE DUCT OR AIR VENTILATION DUCT SYSTEMS 1 or 2 Hour Shaft Alternative Zero Clearance to Combustibles Suggested Exhaust Hood 1 Hood 2 One Layer Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A 3 6-inch (152 mm) Minimum Overlap t , Banding III II , I! Ij ~ 3" (76 mm) i 13 (76 mm) 1A Studs 1B Gypsum Wallboard 2 Duct 3A One Layer 3M Fire Barrier Dud Wrap 15A 3B Banding or Pinning 3C Packing Material 3D 3M Fire Barrier 1000 N/S Silicone Sealant FIGURE 6-3M FIRE BARRIER DUCT WRAP 15A COMMERCIAL KITCHEN GREASE DUCT OR AIR VENTILATION DUCT SYSTEMS 1 or 2 Hour Shaft Alternative Zero Clearance to Combustibles Suggested Roof Vent 21-61 2 1 1 Duct 2 Roof Assembly 3 Roof Flashing 4 Vent Flashing 5 One Layer Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A 6 Firestopping System for Rated Roof Assemblies Only THE DRAWINGS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS REPORT ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE AS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DESIGN FABRICATION OR ERECTION. 31111 Fire Protection Products Technical Bulletin No.: 07-1004 Subject: ASTM E 2336 in code Date: September 19t", 2007 Issued By: Mark Lund, P.E. TITLE: Grease Duct Listings and the Significance of ASTM E 2336 in the IMC & NFPA 96 Significant code changes in the 2006 editions of the International Mechanical Code (IMC) and 2008 edition of NFPA 96 `Standard for Ventilation Control and Fire Protection of Commercial Cooking Operations' have been made that affect field-applied grease duct enclosures. The 3M Fire Barrier products influenced by these changes are Duct Wrap 15A & 20A. Both the IMC1 and NFPA 962 now adopt ASTM E 2336-04 `Standard Test Methods Fire Resistive Grease Duct Enclosure Systems'. This is a departure from the previous code editions, which either referenced different standards3 4, or no specific test protocol at ally. The adoption of ASTM E 2336 will mean greater clarity & simplicity for everyone involved with the submittal & approval process including: the specification author, architectural & engineering design team, plan reviewer, building inspector, distributor, general contractor, and sub-contractor. Previously the use of field-applied grease duct wraps was allowed as either an alternative to gypsum shaft enclosures, by acceptance of an Evaluations Services (ES) report, or from third-party listings based off of ASTM E 119, ]CC-ES AC 101, or UL 1978 testing. Now that ASTM E 2336 appears in the IMC and NFPA 96, the confusion surrounding what the applicable test standard for field-applied grease duct enclosures is, should be eliminated. The IMC now presents ASTM E 2336 compliant field-applied grease duct enclosures as exceptions to gypsum shafts. NFPA 96, which is referenced in the Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) 6, gives the ASTM E 2336 field-applied enclosure method consideration in a section independent of gypsum shafts. State building codes are often versions of a model building code with amendments made to suit a state's particular needs. Many states adopt the international Code Council's (ICC) entire family of codes (IBC, IMC, IPC, etc...) while other states have elected to adopt the IBC but retain the UMC as their mechanical code. In either case the model code that a particular state's code is based off of typically lags behind the model building code publishing cycle. So though the 2006 version of the IMC and UMC have been available for some time now, many states still use an earlier edition as the basis for their mechanical code. For this reason Evaluation 3M Building & Commercial Services Division 3M Center, Building 223-2S-24 St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 Page 1 of 3 Services (ES) reports still serve an important purpose in jurisdictions whose codes haven't yet adopted ASTM E 2336. 3M. intends to maintain legacy ES reportsg so the use of Fire Barrier Duct Wrap in jurisdictions where older model codes are still in place will have continued support. Section 16 of ASTM E 2336-04 contains five `Conditions of Compliance', which are described below along with a synopsis of the passage criteria: • 16.1 Non-combustibility (ASTM E 136) Immersion of samples into 750°C vertical tube furnace. <30s flaming & <30°C heat rise. • 16.2 Fire resistance test (ASTM E 1.19) Vertical wall panel test. Cold side average <250T above initial, individual <325°F above initial, no passage of water through wall panel during hose stream test. • 16.3 Durability (ASTM C 518) 10 cycles of material at 300T for 12 hours then ambient for 12 hours. After the temperature cycling, the increase in average thermal conductivity of the material must be less than 10%. • 16.4 Internal Fire Test 500°F duct soak for 4 hours, then ramp up to 2000T for 30 minutes. Unexposed (non-fire side) surface average <250°F above initial, individual <325°F above initial. • 16.5 Fire Engulfment (ASTM E 119), through-penetration must pass ASTM E 814 through-penetration firestop requirements. Supports and enclosure integrity must remain intact without a through opening during fire and subsequent hose steam. Presented below are (4) Intertek9 design listings that 3M presently h-lds, which are fully ASTM. E 2336 compliant. The fire engulfment component of the testing was conducted for a 2 hour period of time. • GD 531 F & GD 547 F, (2-layers 20A)10 • GD 556 F & GD 557 F (2-layers 15A) It is important that two key sections of ASTM E 2336, section 16.4 (Internal Fire Test) and 16.5 (Fire Engulfment), both appear on a grease duct enclosure design listing. Some design listings may at first glance appear to be ASTM E 2336 compliant but only conform with section 16.5 (Fire Engulfment). If a listing does not explicitly list compliance with 16.4 (Internal Fire Test), it may be based off of testing where the duct was subjected to an internal fire exposure less severe than the exposure prescribed by the ASTM E 2336 or to no internal exposure at all. THIS BULLETIN IS BEING SENT TO: 3M Fire Protection Products Authorized L-1 Direct Dealers 3M Fire Protection Products Authorized L-2 Distributors 3M Sales Representatives 3M Manufacturer's Representatives 3M St. Paul Internal 3M International Page 2 of 3 ' 2006 International Mechanical Code@ 506.3.10, Exception 1 2 NFPA® 96. 2008 Edition Section 4.3.1.2. See also NFPA® 96, 2004 Edition along with Tentative Interim Agreement (TIA) 04-2. ' 2003 Uniform Mechanical Code® Section 507.2.3 NFPA® 96 2004 Edition Section 4.3 5 2003 International Mechanical Code@ 506.3.10, Exception 1 states the duct should be continuously covered "...with a classified a labeled material, system, method of construction or product specifically evaluated for such purpose, in accordance with a nationally recognized standard for enclosure materials..." 6 2006 Uniform Mechanical Code® 507.2.3 In addition to the UMC, NFPA 96 is also adopted by NFPA 101 - Life Safety Code, 2006 Edition Section 9.2.3 & NFPA 1 - Uniform Fire Code, 2004 Section 50. 1.1 s See ESR-1255 (ICBO, UBC), 21-61 (BOCA / NBC), and 2132A (SBCCI / SBC) 9 The ETL SEMKO division of Intertek Group acquired Omega Point Laboratories in April, 2005. 1' In most cases GD 556 F & GD 557 F will be the contractor-preferred listings because of the material/weight savings they provide. However, the 20A listings may be helpful to bridge ASTM E 2336 with jobs that were submitted with ICC ESR-1255 as the basis for compliance. Page 3 of 3 31N1 Fire Protection Products BROADCAST NO. 02-3000 M Fire Protection Products Date: January 25, 2002 Issued By: Max Harshbarger TITLE: OMEGA POINT LABORATORIES APPROVAL OF ROUND DUCTS DESCRIPTION: The Omega Point Laboratories letter dated January 23, 2002, approves round ducts in the 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A. and 20A grease and air duct designs. New OPL designs incorporating the round ducts are being generated and will be mailed to you when received. In the interim, the OPL letter should be used to increase our sales in 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap. THIS BROADCAST IS BEING SENT TO: 3M Fire Protection Authorized Direct Dealers 3M Fire Protection Authorized Distributors 3M Fire Protection Sales Representatives 3M Fire Protection Manufacturer's Representatives 3M St. Paul Internal 3M International 3M Specified Construction Products Department 98-0400-4910-2 3M Center, Building 207-1S-02 PRF 223 St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 O bG A P0# 9 `may January 23, 2002 eORATO~ Mr. Max Harshbarger 3M Company 3M Center, Building 207-1S-12 St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 Re: Round Ducts Dear Mr. Harshbarger: I am responding to your facsimile of January 22, 2002, concerning the above reference. This letter will serve as Omega Point Laboratories' opinion concerning the following alternative duct configuration for 3M's Grease Duct and Ventilation Duct Protection Design Listings. This letter is not to be used as justification for any other opinion, without the express written consent of Omega Point Laboratories, or used for any other project. Currently, 3M's Design Listings for Grease Duct and Ventilation Duct Protection Systems are applied to rectangular ducts as detailed in our Directory of Listed Building Products, Materials and Assemblies. It is our understanding that 3M requests Omega Point Laboratories evaluate to the application of the 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap to equivalent round ducts. The table shows the maximum diameter of a round duct considered to be equivalent to the rectangular duct. Using the equations from LTL 2221, it should be noted that the actual cross sectional area of the round duct is less than the actual cross sectional are of the rectangular duct. Rectangular and Round Duct Equivalency Design Listing No. Test Method Steel GA Rectangular Duct Height Rectangular Duct Width Round Duct Diameter DE GD 531 AC 101 16 24 24 26.2 GD 532 UL 1978 16 24 24 26.2 GD 538 UL 1978 16 48 30 41.2 VAD 529 ISO 6944 20 24 60 40.4 VAD 534 ISO 6944 20 24 60 40.4 VAD 535 ISO 6944 24 10 40 20.7 VAD 536 ISO 6944 26 12 12 31.1 OMEGA POINT LABORATORIES, INC. 16015 Shady Falls Road Elmendorf, Texas 78112-9784 210-635-8100 /FAX: 210-635-8101 / 800-966-5253 www.opl.com / e-mail: moreinfo@opl.com J,0 , 4 Y 1/23/02 Mr. Max Harshbarger Page 2 3M Company Omega Point Laboratories based part of our evaluation of equivalent round ducts on the equations in UL 2221, Tests of Fire Resistive Grease Duct Enclosure Assemblies. This standard uses Btu/hr per square inch of the cross sectional area of the duct to determine heat input, which is the same principle of UL 1978 and AC 101. To determine the cross sectional area this standard uses the equation 7c(D/2)2, where D is the diameter of the round duct, for cross sectional area of round grease ducts. The standard also provides an equation for an equivalent diameter (DE) to determine a modified cross sectional area of rectangular ducts. This value (DE) is determined by the equation 1.30(ab)"11 / (a + 0025, where a = the length of one side of the duct and b = the length of the adjacent side of the duct. In UL 2221, after determining the equivalent diameter (DE), the modified cross sectional for a rectangular duct is determined by the equation, n(DE/2)2. Omega Point Laboratories created the table herein by calculating the equivalent diameter (DE) based on the maximum cross sectional area of the rectangular ducts in our Design Listings. This equivalent diameter (DE) becomes the maximum diameter for round ducts. Other issues were considered in determining equivalent round duct sizes. Omega Point Laboratories considered the test methods and duct configurations. The round ducts are more structurally sound than rectangular ducts, and less likely to deflect during testing. The flexible insulation blankets on round ducts is less likely to create openings during the test. The banding applied around round ducts provides continuous equal pressure as opposed to point loads that result when banding is applied around rectangular ducts. Normally, large rectangular ducts will require more pins than large round ducts to secure flexible insulation blankets in place. It is Omega Point Laboratories' professional judgement based on sound engineering principles that the equivalent round ducts detailed in the above table will meet the requirements of the specified tests. Should you need anything further or have any questions or comments, please call us at (800) 966-5253. We thank you for the opportunity to serve. Sincerely, n D. Nicho as irector, Listing and Labeling Listing and Follow-up Services Mr. Deg Priest, President *1 GA 00.* o a ORATOQ` A~ n I 1 r 31N Fire Protection Products 1 AND 2 HOUR SHAFT ALTERNATIVE/3M FIRE BARRIER DUCT. WRAP 15A OR 20A. A single layer of 15A or 20A can be used to fire protect air ducts for one or two hours with the following provisions. • The product must be installed per the 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 15A or 20A Product Data and Installation Instructions. • The air duct must be minimum 26 gauge steel and the si,e of the duct is not to be limited. • The duct must be constructed and reinforced to IMC, UMC, UBC or SMACNA requirements to carry the weight of the ventilation duct covered with 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap. Duct to be supported in accordance to IMC, UMC, UBC, and SMACNA requirements under a fire load equivalent to ASTM E 119 time/temperature curve. • The protected duct must be firestopped with a tested listed system as it passes through fire rated construction. • There must be no fire dampers in the ventilation system being protected. OPL Design No. GD 538 F SBCCI Report No. 2132A This fire protection design should achieve the hourly rating required when tested in accordance to ASTM E 119. This engineering judgment is based on performance results obtained in testing at OPL and or internal 3M fire tests. Regards, Max Harshbarger Technical Services Manager 3M Fire Protection Products Reviewed by MDH90471 3M" Specified Construction Products Department 3M Center, Building 207-1S-02 St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 98-0400-4910-2 PRF 223 ~ i n. t 3M Fire Protection Products BROADCAST NO.: 04-1014 3M Fire Protection Products Date: October 28, 2004 Issued by: Dave Dronen Brian Carnazza TITLE: 3M FIRE BARRIER DUCT WRAP 15A TESTING ENHANCEMENTS DESCRIPTION: Zero Clearance to Combustibles ❑x We now have tested systems that allow us to have zero clearance to combustibles at the overlaps AND in between the overlaps. • The updated 3M systems are for grease ducts and chemical fume exhaust ducts. • The systems included are GD 532F, GD 538F, GD 548F, GD 549F, CFD 50OF and CFD 501F. These systems are attached to this broadcast and will be updated on the website by November 5'" Updated UL 1978 Test Criteria • 3M System GD 538F has been updated from the first edition UL 1978 (March 29, 1995) to the second edition UL 1978 (June 25, 2002). 0 The UL 1978 first edition states that the unexposed surface of the duct wrap cannot exceed 2501F plus ambient. The UL 1978 second edition states that the unexposed surface of the duct wrap cannot exceed 175°F plus ambient. A THIS BROADCAST IS BEING SENT TO 3M Fire Protection Products Authorized L-1 Direct Dealers 3M Fire Protection Products Authorized L-2 Distributors 3M Sales Representatives 3M Manufacturer's Representatives 3M St. Paul Internal 3M International 3M Building Safety Solutions Department 3M Center, Building 223-2S-24 St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 a,. 16095 Snady Fatis Road EirnendorfJexas 78112 Te£ephone. -01240 635 8100 Facsimile' +0121110x35 8'.011 4S' w4 inteerteK-ehsemkO com September 19, 2048 Mr. Mark W. Lund + Technical Service Engineer 3M Company 3M Building and Commercial Services Division, Fire Protection Products 3M Center,.Buiidirig207-15-02 St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 Subject: Intertek Project Number: 3162819SAT041 Dear Mr. Lund, Intertek is one of the world's largest laboratories. Ourfacility -ls part of a large-division called Commercial & Electrical and our location now referred to internally as Intertek SAT, letter is in response to Barrier Duct Wrap 20A westing a confirmation letter that the 3M rid? nnti W. Fire Samar Duct Wrap 15A in of of The table below indicates the tests and: the most recent test report dates of the tests issued indicating compliance with the ASTM E 2336 and 10C-ES Ac'I01 requirements. ASTM E 2336 15.1-ASTM E 938' 16.2 - ASTM E 1192 - Fire Resistance Test. 16.3 - ASTM C 5183 -Durability Test 16A - ASTM E 2336 -14. Internal Fire Tests 16.5 - ASTM E 2336 -15. Fire-engulfment Tests '(ASTM E 119 ASTM E 81e) ICC-ES A01 01 4,1- ASTM E 136 4.2 - ASTM E 119 - Fire Resistance Test 43 - ASTM C 518 - Durability Test 4.4 - AC101 -4.4. Internal Grease-duct Fire Tests 4.5 - AC101- 4.5. Fire-engulfment Test (ASTM E 119/ASTM E 814) 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap Test Dates October 31, 2000 November 13, 2000 October 31, 2000 May 19, 2003 October 12, 2000 This confirms that Intertek Design Listings GD 531, GD'547,'GD 556 and GO 557 are compliant with all sections of ASTM E 2336 and ICC-ES AC101 'Conditions of Compliance'. VSincerel wed by: f Revie I-Atk iichoias Tracie A. Stanush Project Manager, Engineering Services SAT Team Leader-Engineering Services US n/JDN Attachments: none cc: Trade Stanush ' Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a vertical Tube Furnace at 750°C 2 Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials ' Stead-state Heat Flux Measurements and Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus ' Standard Test Method for Fire Tests of Through-Penetration Fire Stops IntercoK, 16M Shedy FW IS Road, Efinerdarf. TX 70117 SAFEbui1t,,,. COLORADO December 18, 2008 Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road 9 Vail, CO 81657 Description: Addition to original Fire Stopping Submittal _1OC, - b «CP RE: PROJECT: 4 Seasons PERMIT NUMBER: B06-0196 REVISION NUMBER: 23 INTERNAL REF 9488 ADDRESS: 1 Vail Road Dear Mr. Haeberle: SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed the documents to review in accordance with the International Codes as adopted by the Town of Vail. Safebuilt Colorado finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction. Plans: Description: Engineered Judgment for fire-stopping Multiple sheets changed. Plan review fee: No Charge No additional square footage- No added valuation Sincerel , John Plano Plans Examiner SAFEbuilt Colorado john.planokSAFEbuilt.com Cd - ~ T~ Page I of I SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov B06-0196 Rev23 FAL.doc 5F F a„ -IN )ment Review Revision Submittals: 1. "Field Set" of approved plans MUST accompany revisions 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved & the permit is re-issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are $55.00 per hour (2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. Permit #(s) information applies to: Attention: 1 fear SL'as0%% 5 M0.rt.9% `l C1 ?RJ o3- owaa , $ot# -01104 (IieRevisions Response to Correction Letter -attached copy of correction letter Deferred Submittal Other Project Address: sit V a: 1 lb a6 d. Va:1~ Co (..5 Contact Information Company: }1145 A% t- +S- :Z"% - Company Phl78' 7G ' 78 49 Fax: Contact Name: a Ct%r► H• Cv,~'ti %S Contact Ph: Cell:SkS-41<P- C b 8? E-Mail: %t%A'A S hK.S%•aC . r,aWA Town of Vail Contractor Registration No: Description / List of Changes: nA g a!~ a 11 cis t ~ CA , -~a r T%YtS~o ~+6~ O~• ~a►~~y I` X Signature (required) Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building $ Plumbing $ Electrical $ Mechanical $ Fire Sprinkler/Alarm $ Total $ (Use additional sheet if necessary) 1 I i Date Received: D LC~E ~ ME D DEC 10 2008 TOWN OF VAIL Submittal Transmittal Ship Via Hand Delivered Date 12/10/2008 To Martin Haeberle Town of Vail Chief Building Official Director of Community Dev. Vail CO 81657 Phone 970.479.2142 Fax Project Name Four Seasons Resorts - Vail Project Number 11247000 We are Transmitting Shop Drawings ❑ Samples ❑ Product Data F✓ Please review and return 0 copies Description Hi<s FFICE COPY 9488 ~ R 306 -o I 16 Rev 73 D IEc~~aME D DEC 10 2008 J TOWN OF VAE1 APPRO ED Subject to inspection and Corn liance to all relevant Adopted Build Changes in Plan MUS unn I Codes, ar rov d, Date 12-- (Sob Code: Zo-o Copies Submittal No. Description 2 07840-004 R2 Mineral Fiber Firestopping @ Exterior of Slabs. Thermafiber Inc. Remarks This is an additional detail being submitted to the Town of Vail as part of our firestopping systems/details. The use of this product is at the slab edges to exterior wall framing as described in the Hilti Engineering Judgment information. If you have any further questions please give us a call. HKS-Hill Glazier Studio DEC 10 2008 a TOWN OF VAu Sent By John Curtis Iif RMAtieEFule-SaIc(y Fire CofI(it lnlllei Il Iris prolecl Pelf IIIeIeIs by CollfIf ll111to [I it HMAI Ili[ if cAtlflg lost Ili I llot . I Iit IiivlAi-IBeh Cut Min Wall of For Insulation and T mtminiil i, ;>N,OKI SEA!. or Flil:coo( COIL IRMIld NOle~ These products are (IeSlgiled IO colllplenienl (ract) other Ill aft assembly and shouldn't hec(n inined with products having different Ifre conlainfnenl value; In an unprotected curtain wall, or in one protected with low-melt glass fiber insula- tion, there are three ways in which fire can spread from floor to floor. 1. Through the space between the slab edge and the curtain wall. 2. Through the window head mullion and then tip through the cavity Of the curtain wall. 3 Out through the broken vision glass and bark ul through the curtain )wall. THFHMAFIBEn Life-Safety Fire Containment Products compartmentalize fire, preventing it from spreading from the floor of origin up to the floor above by: 1. Filling the slab-edge/curtain wall gap will] Thernlafiber Safing Insulation 2. Protecting the vertical mullions 3. Providing a vertical barrier to fire using Thernlafiber Curtain Wall or FireSpan Insulation Code Requirements All model building codes ul the U.S.A. require that the gap at the slab edge/Curtain wall Interface be treated to maintain the same fire Inlegnly as the floor-ceiling The THERfAAHBEii Life-Salely Fire Contaillillenl Systems have been mdependenlly tested by Underwriters Laboratories and Onlega Point Laboratories and accepted or recognized (ICRO ER-2331, California Stale [-lie Marshal. OSHPD) as maintaining lire containment from floor to (loot How the. THFHMAFIBEH System Works THEHMAINIEH CurlaIll Wall and Safing Insula(ions have effectively stopper) fire lot many years I lowevei. experience has shown smoke to be often more life-lhrealening than fire I The TIIFFfdf,foFH I it(, Safety Fire Conlainnielll Syslenls 101 pollowler plolecholl colllbll1es - I?nrw•i it 1foil-faced insulation with a specially (test( ned fire and smoke re sislanl sealant to (of 111 I - _ an effective barrier to the passage of smoke as well as tire_ At f,lah pemoelMS. ;1 ! hVildfdlBER SMOKE SEAL, FirIRODl: Co111pound. of other approved smoke sealant is used to seal the 7HrHa.v~FlHr r, Salulg Insulation to both the foil lacing of fnrrurnnHEr, Curtain Wall I s' lr- ;i pr f II?E.riPArd In;ll1a11011 ;711(1 lI1P. b001 ;fah. fill ;ear COIl1pIP,l( I!~ brlllgL;; the 101) Of the -I-I " 11U I ,I i I opening hetween the slab and the curlaln wall, ef(echveh; elinimaling the passage of fire' ---I---I-~ -1 . rs-.~-~ all(1 smoke II1rOlIClh tills (?I f',a nsn7f See specific svslern (or de(a)ls oil the approved smoke sealalll - Why Thermafiber insulation products can perform in five "onlrolleu m accordance willi ASTM 1 1,, 19 (Isle lenlperalLIW W1.1110nship sn0twe Sul?eriol - f !ire characteristics of 1110MIl0e1 InSOlahOn I)fOOL T" (Sre Graph) j -F---'- ' I Thermafibe, Inc 3 wtivw.lhennaliiler,;om Why do you need "fire containment" The fir ;l prlonty Ill building safety I, contalnrnenl of botil iire and smoke 10 the area of origin For mid and fugh rise bulldings, lire and smoke nnlst be prevented Item spreading Io the next floor Since file Boor assembly is lypically a fire-rated system, a possible route for fire spread is lhrolJgh and Up the exlenor curtain wall system, which Is fre(luenlly overlooked. In or(ier to protect fills aveak point, the exterior curtain will system most 111 eliminate lire "title opening" between the iloor slab anti spandrel panel, and (2) provide a lire containment barrier That causes life flames exiting the vision area on one floor to be diverted and cooled so that they are less likely to fgnite cOmbHStiblPS on lira floor ;)hove Spread of fire (unprotected) THEHMAHBEH Fire Containment (protected) Aluminum-Framed file tollownu, cliecldrst con(alns Important details Thal nwsl he Included in It lar;-(mitirw, Fire Containment System Curtain Wall Systems- used ul an alrlnlinum - Iranled Curtain v.all syslew wllh alunmlLUl) glass Or Slone Spann N panels (See SpeCific test Design Criteria design for details.) i HEnMAFIME' Curtanl Wall (CVV) Or FIN SPAN InsnlanOU IS mechanically allarned to mtilllons and Iransoms using ullpaling urns. Screws or Mile! postlive nlecnanlcal allachnlent Fxposed alunununl nudhonc nnlst he protected with ILEHMArIUFH Curla!n IiVall (CW) or HI FSP,;r! Insulation mullion covers (See specific test design for details.) 1HI:IIMAF)HER Safini) insulation i s conlpress!on lit (nlinurlum 1l2•• wider than opening) (see specific test design for details) into sale-oft area (2"-8") and supported IAnth safing "Z" clips (optional in some designs). 4 A light steel angle or channel Is placed horizontally at the safing line, attached to vertical mullions-either within the insulation at a horizontal splice. or behind the insulation and attached to vertical mullions. This detail prevents bowing of curtain wall insulalion due to the compression fit of the Saling insulation. 5. To further resist passage of smoke, systems that do not include FIREcooi Compound or other approved smoke sealant should utilize foil-laced ]HERMAFIBER Safing Insulation (flush with the lop of the slab) and be perimeter- caulked with IHERMAFIt1En SMOU SERI C0111pOUnd; or utilize a 112" fill of THERMAFIaER SMOKE SEAL Compound over file Foil-Faced 1HFR10AFIBF1l Safing Insulation (recessed 112" front the lop of the slab). ylass. alumnmrn THERMAFIBER CW 0, or shoe _ nr FIRESPAN n tulauon nrnned to mullion covers O Smoke Sealant r5 O (J lsldb Uack angle r f_'l Fod4ace0 or (3~, unlaced THERAdAFIBEn Salny rn Selaknn -punn1d by Z CMGs sleet .ingle nreuudwn hangers THFRMAFIBER ClV FIRE SPAN Ins.l.n.n pinned to angle clips aluminium curt- wall system Steel Stud-Framed Curtain Wall Systems- Design Criteria Steel Stud-Framed Curtain Wall Systems-Design Criteria The following checklist contains inlportant details that must be included in a THERMAFIBER Fire Containment System used fit an steel sluddrarned curtain wall System. (See specific test design for details.) 1. THERMAFIBEn FIRLSPAM SS insulation is friction-fit between the steel studs. 2. THrnMAIFIBER Safing Insulation is compression fit (minimum 112" wider than opening) (see specific test design for details) into safe-off area (2"-8") and supported with safing "Z•• clips, 24° o.c maximum (optional in some designs). 3 SHI I lHOI:K' Brand Gypsum Sheathing. FIr,Fcoml Core, or DunocK Brand Cement Board, is screw-attached to the exterior face of the studs. SI!rrlnor•K" Brand Gypsum Panels, F!RFcom Core. is screw-attached to the interior face of the studs. See specific: lest design for other approved Gypsum Board manufacturers. 4. F!;r-i;oor compound or other approved snloke sealant 17 i3)SHE ETROCK I nrand GYPS nm , SheaVnno. IRECODE Co", nr UUROCK Drano I Ezlenor Cement eoaro I - - I SHEETHOCKij• Brand Gypsum Panels FIRFCODF. Cum utlenor svs(Mn - I j _Srnokc sealanr•C. Tllernlafiher Inc; ' 2' THFWAAFIRFR ~I r r (Z gap Inc uracu ICII oxen I THFRMAFIRER - : IIiESP AfI 5- insulann' I.Ifllnn Ill vww therm, tibercom I, I j - steal slid' - irIEE'. laL`Ct: rasp ~ I II I 5,q- n: Panels FIRECODE Cnrp THERMAI'MEn Fire Containment Curtain Will System-Design Criteria t. Selector-Curtain Wall f=ire Containment Glass Spandrel Curtain Wall Fire Containment Aluminum Spandrel Curtain Wall Fire Containment Gypsum Sheathing Curtain Wall Fire Containment ~ 111' r/ II I ' (2) F-, x~) (2) Ad ¢ 1 3 r~ + (2) Traditional fire testing procedures are designed to evaluate a specific element I,I:wall. heart or floor-Ceiling) uuiependenlly Hrn%~evel, if, rurlam wall flies, the suI ullaneous attack of lire and smoke on several Constru0011 elements dictales the need for it 111011M to evaluate the tulewndenl elements of a fire amtanunent system as a whole. fherlnafiber hu, Is actively partlrq)abng on a technical committee with the American Soaely of Tesbnn Material!" (ASTMI to develop a standard lest rnelhod lot delennining the fire-endurance of different curtain wall fire-containment assemblies. Underwriters Laborntories (UI) and Omega Point Laboratories (OPL). lesiinq ';nth the Inlennediate- Scale, Mulli `Aw", Test Apparatus, rave tested and listed ThenTnahber in over ,)O curtain wall systems ill then Fife Hesislance Oirecloty under a new classification titlecl "Perimeter Fire ContalnnTenl Systems " These UL and OPL-Classified syslems, along wilh lesis wilnessed by UL and other independent parlies. are noted in the selector below Note: Low-melt 1)01111 Im:ulationS cannot be SUbShtUted lof TFfFfikaAFIBF, Insrtlahons in anv losled assembly. II is imperative that IHFRmtn iRFii Curtain Wall or HIESPAN IIISUlallons and Tnuimik.FiUFH Sating Insulation be. used logelhef to achieve hfP conlatunenl - Fire - filed Contruction Fire Ratio 9 - Oeta11 & Physical Description b Tell No. System Reference 2 hi. Fire Integrity Riling Heabsliengtheneo opaque glass. 1/4" Ihick. serumtl to ,In,, 111 1 Mullions with aluminum retainers-2 - 45 min. Insulation " TuI R1:IAIMM FIRI Svmi Foal-face( hlsolluoi1 fe:essed hetweell vertical fnulhons. attached to n1011011S, wl(h sheel Rating, melal shields oil 4 1 ' long Impaling pills locaI0(f in each comes and spaced 12" o c ium afomld UL Des. No CW-S-2001 pennon er- plus swaged to nominal "xl.'`< "steel members sclew-anached lu mnihons-nmlhons coveleo UI will) d" write still;: of nmflrnrll bow.virlnH; Fm!SPA9 Foil Faced Insldah(n-covers cemele.(I over 111n111(nls and hansom, and impaled on same pins used in seput: C1111,1111 Will Ilsulmm~-secumd W I th Jl h I: i nu s ields- 1. 112"x.t li2" 20 gauge angle installed to sidfen cliltain wall insulation behveen,Wtwal mullions at sallou pant-end of stiff hark migle srre led to venccilf mullions-sale-011 area sealed with :I" Lai;rearlluI; Sauna Insulation on safing rhps or 12- o.c max --sahnq lopped with I" Ihick FIRILON Compound For more information on this system, request publication IW942 from Thermaliber Inc 2 hr. Heal Strengthened glass spar)(Ifel panel 1/4" [nick. 1I In alunwuin nndhnm at : u.( will] rnessme 0181eS--mceSse.(f 2' for u1AAIIHr hns.SPAII insulation aoached over impaling pins with ;heel melal Shields U~ 12' o In T\2 z;' ;feel members Screve attarhoo muihons-ntulllons covered with 6 wade. I Mack -lssm I IRIILI•i11171' FmF r a) Insulali(nl Initiated 17' U.L. On same pits supporting u n n r ria r F r IOS11lal on 1 'I w22 (la. steel angle 'lnennurq hnhtonlally Pmfae(low In i f.'tir.nJ IrlsolRUon :I: 1101110,11,11 tiphce of blankets Safe off area hehveen iunlare and assembly was sealed with C thick 111 labeled IIIHu.I..Frrv I. Stdnh; Insulation will! :,almg clips-Ul Repon Dated 9-30 94 For more information on this system. request publication IW902 from Therniafiber Inc. 2 hr. Fire Integrity Riling Aturrrinunl Spanrlnli paneh; sel.umd In aluninunl nndhons~ Foil-Fared In:1.r,lArflut hn(SP;ar Insulallon 2' thick 45 min. Insulation Rating"' , installed between millions. ailacheo over inq)ating plus nlou1110 on 2- r. 2` x 2" steel member:; spew UL Des CW-S-2002 attached to nn11liors Insole lace 111 fill illions covered wilo 2" flick slaps of foil-laced TNt IUaNIf3F5 F53r5PAr., 0 Insulation. Curtain wall insulation and 11711111011 covers held i) place on Impaling pins by chili h shretoss 1 1I11iRMAHIP:R Saint) 1111,11181101-. 4" thick. hl between the concrew floor ano curfam wall insul loon. recessed 1'" below file lop surface of concrete floor. oll(I impaled 011 Shaped sahnq clips 12 o.c.'Itlll back steel cmllviel, Insillied hellaul (:11111111) lvlfl Insulation 10 pmvloe lateral s(ippoli r!Yl cdl)r eolopollnd appIj,u (n'L'I Baling insulation it a thickness of I For more information nn this system request publication IW91G from Thermaliber inc. , 2 hr. Fire Integrity Rating SI, 11loo, Wood Ful,--ow Gypsum Sheaihmg, 1.i18- Ihn:k. or Dt fir Cement Want ii:` n. Sig" INC, 45 min. Insulation Screwabached ill exterior ilde of four )/t ?0 n steel stun fmrrnno T,~mvfkI f Rahnq'.. InS11lalion in ,lud cavils snu i:,o,:,. Bland Fi. v. ut (ypsunl Panel , /f !hick SCrew attache n to Ineliol Sine UL Des. CW S-1001 of file ; 5/8' 20 ga Iranm)g--4 Imcn Tnbud,::awt Sating Insufahon dcBn ES Repoil Fri ',)331 regtaws loll lace(I Sarni; nlsuiaholo hetwveen edge of tune r Ie 31ah anri (lypsunl nealhrno, conlmeSitOn hl an(I Sncpreo tr'IU) sa!ulg LI US - n r- If Ilrn F94,i n11000n'1 'UOp ir; ft' : tin(! Ins111RI10n For more Inlonnihon ( L on this system) request publication IW91 I from Thermaliber Inc. n(lles. n) ill)! ulsurlllpn Rldng is (i ill&tnS ill ahng In„ UrUl. i:hOn prOrllle(I by ,t ronlm %iai SIS10,1I1 ,:ll:unsl seal Ilansio,. IhrOngh Inc salcrnll .vet. ii IS nllaslL err 2S ow ran,- it of es In: ria lemnPralla" In r1si- 325 or, ;h.' un.,.ooieo r:ac 4ii:r le'l NOW into Curia", "all ;Ifol J:I111113 wsu:aron\ ae': 1), If`ill - 11 .t f.'1. :i 1111!11' -i'1 III III)Il li l' eonnnrtuli msolalwus AIP snnrm :•,dnr,,l! loll h01." lo• See next page for more dmiuns Thermafiber Inc 5 www.thermafiber.corn Curtain Wall Fire Containment Systems Fire-rated Construction - - _ System _ UL Assemblies I - - Fire-rahnJ OPE ASSamhhes Flre r~linn ' - - I Cw 1) 2?o0,' (eJ ,,313 FJ 20413 - --l ('W1) 2ootl ' I/:?„2hr CLJ 173P Uj')i613 1 Dynamic, ~ VJ-D-2011 M) I54P rJ 22213 2hr CEJ )(31P CE.) 24rip' I Glass spandrel Alunnnum Framed CE 203P (.EJ 257P _2_I/2J]L_i - t W ;_2001 } - ! I nt Sialic (W-S- 2003 - - 1 CVV 2021' 1 112 f; 2111 - CW S 2034' CEJ 136P CEJ 16 PP Glass Spandrel - Steel Framed Dyn;tmlc CEJ 138P El 21013 i CEJ 1 78P CEJ 212P 2 hr. CEJ I76P' CEJ 228P' f _ - - . - - - - - . " CEJ 164P CEJ 230P I ' CEJ 20913'' ! ' Dynamic Dynamic. CW D-2009' GE :J 1- 112 S 2hr. CEJ 79P' CEJ 227P' 2 hr Aluminum Spandrel Aluminum Framed 1 C "._.W-D"2012 _ " WS 2002 . 2 _ - - 5la uc CV200r' I,r - - t CW-S 2022' 1 1/2 Y, 2 hr - CW-S-2035' I I I- -I CEJ 135P° 'CEJ 16513 I Aluminum Spandrel - Steel Framed Dynanuc I CEJ 137P' CEJ 211 P- ! CEJ 1756 CEJ 213P' 1 h I j , r 2 CEJ 177P' CEJ 229P' - - - - - ( i- - CEJ 163P CEJ 231 P' I CW D-2003' - .f- - I ---1 ' I Grande Spandrel - Arununum Flamed Dynamic, I CPI.D-2010' - - 1 112 IS, 2 ht j l , CW-S-20081 - r - - - SIa1iC ! I12 3 2hr. i i - C W S-2036' I CND 1001 ' CEJ t30P1 Concrete Spandrel Till -Up Panels Dynamic CV/-D 2005' ~ CW D 2005 - - CWS-1007. I 2hr. CEJ 17013' 1 2hr. , Slatic CW-S 2014' I 2 hr. - - t- ConCte(e Spandrel Alum inum FRamed , Dynamic CFJ 14 1 P CJ 16913 CEJ 181P CEJ 207P ' 2 hr I j ! CEJ 153P, CEJ 225P- ! CEJ 155P CEJ 256P' 1 Concrele Spandre! Steel Framed Dynanur _ _I CEJ 134P' I - - - - - I If I 2 hi CFJ-174P CEJ 1932 CEJ 25813' ~ CEJ 23413 t hr i CEJ 131P CEJ 2 913 CEJ 238P CEJ 26OP' i Gypsum shealhing steel Framed Dynamic CEJ 239P CFJ 26113` CEJ 240P CEJ "!6213' 2 hr CEJ 21111) ' CEJ "UP i CEJ 242P CEJ 264P' ! i I - CW ;i-100 j--- ' CEJ 24313 CE.) 26513 --I - ! i Static I CW-S 1002 2 he J ~ - CW-S-100;i' Sleet Suantlrel Aluminum Flamed r)ynanar, CEJ 140P' CEJ 20813' U.) 180P CEJ 226P 2 hl I - _ _ CID tU Sleia Spandrel Sleet rl;unerl Dynan"r -i ( CFJ t32P' CEJ 18213 CCJ 171 P CF.1 19613 1 ? hr - L'LI 1721' CC.12191, j 1 16013 ! J 2'713 ' rJOle. 3M F«. 8a ni.r Spray ,Intl ,iA4 fn;. Dane SPi~I/a re equ,vali, I rannke svaianis tiolll ;e;ilanl:; an I Inicu;hangn Ihl, III ally syswlll! Srm'i.I , nq 3iv1 smoke :>ralanls Smoke Sealant Manulachlrer. SP ;inulkr: Se;a;lnl ManulaClule.I. l,r;ICe CU/Lrrl«:hOn P~OrhtCl.'; Smoke Sealall! Id7udaCnul', ;W' ;~nnk,n',o;Alin! F~12nula:aumr. Mil"10. Mc Sn,okc xalanl Manul,-rcturdl rlui, bnurke be;danl Manuminillel. Passive Fife Pmlerrion Parnrels Smoke Sealant Manulaclure!. Un!led Shll@5 GYU.iIU ❑ I.() Smoke Si:alan; Ytarndar.lum! Neisotr Frresrop I'molicls Smoke-Sealanl Manlaatawr,. .rr rlul,: A1ivnNb: . nelatl•; if the III ulo 1,11". assenlhhes rao h!: Ihqucsh'r! h', rI nl,u unl! rhennallb et Inc ;it 3'W; 8:1:1 'L3_.. I )cl;uis (.;lrl ;n;rr I" IMAI al .u: Of'! :m .!l it - .:•I'I Ill!" n III - I Atli' 11 vte A "rm 1o I )Pt_'.: BSitall,llr~.; haul then t:eb'.le. I'llcv.Iln '.!yw!, !dllel,np_ (:I' ,-,p - ~)u,4'p4F 'I roll IhnYll :I„11 [Ilck Un IA0111t"%rltY.ln/P. ';1:101 I,(II JII h1 III hr.af, nr, ~ulx'n'ndn (i, (It'SI(III L, D..'$Ip!1 Wimilll!, , I:hl:k till !IIY. rlnvol aglow ano !;r?le!:l Illn neSl(rn Iull i1w; I„ i,'(,J 1331' Uisny. tAl('.k oil lilt, (gin I:ollllil Il),! Oe.Inn tlnl. ltl;Il;Ilr'ar In 1)(11 loollal t0 I v 1!L 1; a5:,nndlhNS boon Ihell r.,eh slle rhrt. Om r ! q,i: rr% I1! < hun!r Ir,l(to III n r I. :;I,,: ; . ,tlwtlrr. hqt. ,n n, r,rnbe, I r (.,;r "r1C' :11r fl me-. Ille Sr:xt:! hullm. {.ilr.glnq on I e 'fHl)G opens I!:,i ilt9;gp, Ilir Thermahbel Inc_ 6 WWW.IhCn afi1Ler. Conn Installing the correct perimeter lire containment design is essential to life and property safely. Many fire rated assembly Installations require the approval of a third early evaluation service The following curtain Wall fire C:ollril neat systems have been evaluated and approved by Muse accrediled leboratones, Omega Pow Laboralones. Inc (OPI i and Underwrilers Laboralones. Inc (UI-i Therrnafibei FIRESPAW". FIRFSPAN SS and Safinq Insulation are U(_ and OPL classified life Conlaounenl products untended for use In fhe !OIIOWInq r11ed assenlbties Iherrnalibef Curtain Wall insulations; CW 4o, CW 70 and CW 9(1 nl combinalion wall Ther111aliber Safinn Insulation also provlae superior fire protection in peolhe el fire nnlamnlenl sw;tems Thennaliber Cunaul wall Insulation has proven its fire performance rapahdNes In many rlillerenl lire comalnmenl assemblies with 1 2 and hour rahngs as outlined ht the following lesleo systems Curtain Wall Fire Containment Systems j re-rated Construction System i Design I; Fire falmr, i fEG~~~(11 . Cf.G 17 `L0-89 2 hr Glass Spandrel `ilalie CEG I 16 go- 1 "'mE 72481 CEG 8.6 81 1 1 Itr 1 CEG 7 25.85 i I us(; 10 1il 71 j hr Aluminum Spandrel Static VIA 1,2455 I i f I_ IJSG 6-:3-/I I ~ I hl Safing Insulation Fire Containment" L C E G 7-27.81 Thermaliber Smoke Seal Compound CEG a 23 CO - I 3 11I Wrote Spandrel Static CEG 10 6.81 2 hr. CEG 1-15-90' Fire Containment 3 hr. - 1 or, I Detail 8 Physical Description 8 Test No. Spandrel panel containing CW Insulauott -sale-off area sealer) with 4" thick THI.nMAnBrn Salina Insulallon-WJE 3-3.72 and USG 11-30.71 ------rHERMAFIBER Cuniu I wall ,r~sulat,an I- Lr - >-r rHERMAFIBER $almu insulal,on --7HERMAFIBER salmg -P.h lq Or, or Z-ap, Performance of Uninsulated Panels Performance of Low-Melt-Point Insulations `imoke Lontrol Notes (1) IN,, Is a test desuien In nemonslr le the pedonnanr-e of L••! e.v,~ qa I; `ialuul lu;ulahon u. a cumaul ev;dl app6C.ahhn irs!s ;Ire ulenldw.d ;ISVJJE 3-3 7, and USG 1' :;(1 i I TUEHMIAFIBER fire-tested an unprotected granite panel curtain wall system in February 1989 to determine whether stone panels need fire protection to maintain their integrity in curtain wall assemblies: - TuERMAFIBER Sating Insulation alone (no CW insulation) was used to fill the void between the slab edge and the granite panel. - At seven minutes info the ASTM E 119 (ANSI/UL 263) lime-temperature controlled lest, cracks formed in the 3 cm thick granite panel, and went completely through the granite - COACIUSIon: Without the additional fire protection of Curtain wall insulation. the granite panel system may fail. A glass spandrel panel system was also fire tested. It was protected with glass liber curtain wall Insulation and THFnMAHAR Salina insulallon. The purpose of file test was to determine whether glass libel insUlalions can be Used for fire-containmenl in conjunction with TH[fWAFIRER Safing Insulation. - At ten Inir4lteS into file ASTM E 119 (ANSI/UL 263) lone-temperature controlled test, the glass fiber insulation began to melt. - At 21 minutes, 45 seconds, the glass spandrel shattered. - When the glass shattered, the NF.h&IAlIffll Safing Insulation (ell oul Intact. - Conclusion: Glass fiber insulations readily melt in fire, providinq insufficlenl fire containment. Aher succescl~llly (ICV010ping stlsl~ms to fnovlde ille crnuauunenl m rurlau) svali „rid I)enetralton applications. IhernTaflber addressers a second life-saleiv concern. Smoke control_ The company developed and tested smoke control Systems for the following reason; - Smoke Inhalation causes 75% of all fire deaths. - 65%, of all fire deaths occur away Ironl file fire room. There is no Industry-accepled test nlelhod to evaluate the ability of ;I n alenal or assembly to contain smoke,. In Geometer fire Coll lai1)Wenl systems - Contact it 1 hermalihel representalive for more information on :smoke control Thefmaliber Inc 7 www,lherrnaliber.coni Sound Attenuation Fire Blankets THERMARBER Sound Attenuation Fire Rlanket s (SAFB) are nominal 2.5-lb /cu, if, (4 lb /cu it. for 1 density blankets specilically intended to be used for sound attenuation in walls and ceilings I hey are highly effective um I'MIC ng sound transmission They are provided ur standard widths of 15". 16 17 24 and 25" by 48" length for Installation between studs or joists. They are available m thicknesses of 1" to 6" (in 1/2° increments) to provide a variety o! levels of sound anenuation.They are panicularly useful in partitions requiring fire ratings and as overlayinenl for acoustical tile. or panel ceilings to improve acoustic,... Surface burning characlerstics are flame spread 0, smoke, developed U Sound AHenualun Depending on the particular assembly and application, partition STC ratings have been unproved up to eleven pouTts Fire Blanket by installing THERMAHRFn SAM m the stud cavity. The insulation also has been shown to Improve MTC ratings lot Assemblies low-frequency sound attenuation, isolating sounds from machinery, mechanical equipment and musk. THERMARBER SAFBs are superior to glass fiber in sound attenuation. in fact, low-density (<1 Ib./cu.ft ) glass fiber insulation requires greater thickness than standard THERMAnRER SAFB to provide the same attenuation Creased THERMARBER These engineered assemblies offer the mosl economical drywall and veneer plaster sound systems in the SAFB Assemblies 50 to 55 STC range. They are also fire-rated, making there ideal for party and corridor walls in hotels, motels, offices and multi-family dwellings. The Creased THERMARGER SAFB system is a patented insulation blanket assembly that is 1 " wider than regular blankets. After the blanket is installed in the partition cavity, a 1- vertical slit is field-cut partially through the center of the blanket, allowing it to be creased. Compressing the extra width into the stud cavity buckles the center, exerting pressure against both studs and drywall. This pressure dampens sound vibrations and boosts tine partition's STC rating. For example, a single-layer drywall partition with Creased THERMARBER SAFB has the same STC rating as an unbalanced drywall partition with standard SAFB. For further information about THERMARBER SAFB and Creased SAFB, request TF885, Thermafiber Sound Attenuation Fire Blankets (SAFB) available from Thermafiber Inc. 61 STC' 2-hr. partition, resilient channel-3" THERMARBER SAFB in stud cavity-1/2" gypsum wallboard Type C core- 3-5/8" 20 ga studs 24" o.c.-RC-1 channel or equivalent one side, spaced 24" o.c. screw-att to studs-3 layers gypsum panels screw-an to studs, double layer screw-att to chan-joints stag and fin-perimeter caulked-UL Des U419 or U455-RAL-TL-87-153 ' M 56 STC 2-hr. partition, double-layer drywall-2" THERMARBER SAFB in stud cavity-2 layers 3/4" SHEETHOCK Brand gypsum panels, ULTRACODE core, ea side-2-1/2" 25 ga steel studs 24" o.c.-panels screw att with joints stag and tin- UL Des U419, U490-ULCW441 or SA-910907 IP jl 59 STCr69 IIC' 2-hr. ceiling-double-layer drywall-3" THERMARBER SAFB-floor of carpeVpad, 1-112" flooring 112" plywood-2 x 10 wd joists 16" o.c.-ceiling of 2 layers 5/8" gypsum wallboard Type C core, over RC-1 channels or equivalent 16" o.c.-UL Des L541-RAL-TL90-40/RAL-IN-90-5 50 STC' 1-hr. partition-single-layer drywall, resilient channel-3" THERMARBER SAFB in stud cavity-5/8" gypsum wall- board Type C core-2 4 16" or 24" o.c.-RC 1 channel or equivalent one side, spaced 24" o.c.-panels app ar r~~ honz all to channels-end joints back-biockeo with RC-1 Cnannel with 1 " T,epr S screws-oon side direCt att a with -1 /4 ° : ;1, IN sere::, ioiiM fill penmeler caulked-UL Des U3 I i and ULC U3 i i-BBN-/60903 sTr; va:ueS It,, Ua<-e(: Un Snw71ro,Y' Brand gypsum panels. uerQ~o' f Thermafiber Inc. www.thermaiiber_com THERMAFIBER FS-25 Commercial Blankets are intended for most exposed-111SUlabon and vapor-confrof sllualions, such as lloor/ceilings. walls or crawl spaces They provide thermal anti sound control properties and are also foil- laced with an FSP vapor retarder They are available in 3-I1) /cu If density in Ihicknesscs of 3 io G slaficiarci widths of 16" and ?4- and 48" long Flanle spread rating is 25. smoke developed 0 dNes arp DRSC(I On Shee..lrnck Rr nd %F,51u71 pdnels. Freco;IC ..STC vahies are na5p(1 00 51(pP.000F: - "and avusl'w t)mplS. Rrecow" Thermatiber Inc 9 ,aww Ihermafiber. com 50STC U, ~,rv ~1I 11,6t. 58 STC' t~ 2-hr. partition, single-layer drywall-3" THEAMAFIBER SAFE In Sh1d CeVIIV-3/4" SHEETRocI: Brand gypS11111 P811eIS UunNCOOI_ core, ea side-rain 3-1/2° 25 ga steel studs 24" o.c.-panels screw att-joints stag lin-pennletel caulked-UL Des U419 or U491 or ULC W440-USG-910617 1 112-hr. unbalanced partition, resilient channel drywall-3" THMMAFIBER SAFB III Stud cavity-1/2" gypsum wall- board Type C rore-3-5/8° 20 ga studs 24" 0 .c.-RC-1 channels or equivalent one side spaced 24" o.c. scre+.w- atl to studs-2 layers gypsum panels screw-aft to studs, 1 layer screw-att to channels-joints stag and fin- perimeter caulked-UL U452-RAL-TL-83-215 51 STC 1-hr. partition, single-layer drywall, Creased-3" Creased THERMAF18ER SAFB in stud cavity-5/8" gypsum wall- board Type X-3.5/8" 25 ga steel studs 24" o.c.-panels screw att-joints stag & fin-perimeter caulked-UL ' q Des U419 or U465-RAL TL 90 166, SA 860620 48 CAC Class A ceiling-3" THERMARBER SAFB laid over ceiling, extending 4' each side of partition-AURATONE' - 5/8" x 24" x 48" acoust clg panels in Susp Exp Grid Syst-contin over partn-ASTM E84-Sound test USG 820406 57 STC' 2-hr. partition, clouble-layer drywall chase wall-3-1/2" THERNIAFIBER SAFB on one side in stud cavity-2 layers 5/8" gypsum wallboard Type X, ea side- i -5/8" 25 ga steel studs 24" o.c. in 2 rows spaced 6-1/4" apart-5/8" j gypsum panel gussets or SO run braces spanning chase screw-att to studs-panels appl screw an-joints stag & L. fin-UL Des U420-TL-76-156 ~ r FS-15 and TIiERMAvitim FS-15 Commercial Blankets are ideal for commercial wood- and Steel stud assemblies and exterior - -^s i,,nkels 7-furring. The} are available in densilies of 4-lb./cu It (1" thickness) or 2.5-lb./cu. tl. (1-1/2 lhickness and thicker), thicknesses of 1 " fo G", standard widths of 16" and 24 ° and 48" long. When installed in exterior walls. they reduce heal transmission, savinn energy and improving occupant comfort Flame spread raiind is G ,smoke leve!oped rl Product Data Product Density Standard Sizes Dimensions 40 4.U -0.~ +I.O 2 see tests for req'd. attachment - - CW 70" 6.0 -0 75 +2.0 1-1/2" see - tests for req'd. attachment - -----s lot r CW 90- 8.0 -1.0 +2.0 1 ' see tests for req'd. attachment Satiny 4 0 0 5 see tests for req'd attachment t SAFE Z I. 05 +t.0 11 Iriclion it between studs All other SAF13 25 1-0.5 , 1.0 1.112 fiction tit between sluds FS 15 4.0 0 i +I 0 I I" InCUOn 14 between studs - All dhpr FS i 5 .5 _ I 0 ri . 1.0 1 t! r hVion fit between sluds i_ FS 25 0.5 + !.0 3" 1 friction lit between studs (II Applies in Win) sian(lam ruin, :Ind dxk cnto, cumin r:;tl! Insnlallon fc'i On oacka(p. welghl bas; Product Designation Mimm~lln Thickness Maximum Thicknes° Width" " Length°' W 40 - fi, 24 4R.. fifi.. CW 70 - _ - 24' 36 48° 30 'W 90 . " '4. 3G 48 60 111r IIA1h111111t Fnli:ll'hn 1 5" 36' Ili' 60" lun:n uau F,In S1 SS G 24 '.6' 18 60- Satincr i 6• - - - - Snu)nr .`,la. Compound - 3(I oZ crirln(:gl:, b (Ill. palls r'inlloll r,ompUUnn in. hall. .1 (it awl 'I'll nai pall!) - SAFB.. 1.. 6.. 16' . 24 ' 18.. Creased SAH " 3'. } 5 1 T . 25" 48 FS 15 6' 24 ' FS 25 W. Ifi', 24 aft' _ pole UnIlells,on IolWances -wallh 118-. IN01IeSS 118_ 114-; length l1a-«3i4' IN all CW;all, R:n:5^:.u ololhn'1S.: 112- lot all pine, orfHlu[IS- o f f I I FSP alunununl foil 41011(1 al Hl (talk rolm pnxlucls ale also a llahle 121 Consult sales representative. In, additional wes (.n SAFrl (lenslh' lo, Ihn:kneSs r•; 4 p[I, all Ollie, IhICU smS ale. 251x;1 i I Approximate I Product Actual Density Designation Density-pct Tolerancle- 1`4 Min. Thick. Application Method Thermal Conductivity and Thermal Resistance (according to ASTM C518) I (24" C) For insulation only I Product btu - In./hr. 8 v-,-we ue, icw l 1-112" thick Desi nation °F I _ R il I 2` thick 1 2-112" thick 3" thick 3-1/2" thick 4- thick 5-1/4" thick _ 6" thick - - g . • - -sg R R B F R , C6V 4p .25 1.11 I- FS.O IU.n 12 0 14 0 94 0.. - CW 10 0 24 1(U gU 023 4.2 I s 10A t h 5 1 d 7 I - 12.5 1 - I 1 ri 16.6 _ - ..-I - - 5.0 - - - _ . _ . . Inn I,o 1,,2 1Z, 1r . 13.0 . - + --i AL)r;I JS 1 .95 ( 0 Sating (125 a 0 4 p 11.0 ino I - - 12.0 140 ; 16.0 - - - 24 l] -I- - - -L. - - - 160 - SAF8 ;,5 - _ - IAIIulln--SAFB _ (127 j 3.7 _I 16 7~l i r III Ii(1 X22 I E 1 ) 0.95 _ I I) ' nll Other F 1 0 7 9 t (I ; 8 to 92.2 I 25 (126 1 ; R - - - - - I I ! - 13.5 - i.') 4 - - ZD 2 - 2; 1 - - '~i1111e.S to II{ilh ;~iallll•II II cola, ;Illrl (en1. Ctllor (;rnelm v:;III n w i.11"In Surface Burning Characteristics Product Flaine ; sllloke (According to ASTM E84) 'Desonahon Sprrad Developed lnFlcec! rip I ;ainnl tiFI' u it Fud i aceri° CVd, Foespan. Sahnrl. FS25 - - 25 p i ISII IVI Sri" Compound - 0 T1 n1u run. Cnnglound n o ;H! n:.11,4v fnn I I t"noee.'l In IIII 1 0111. I11 (Po, _"~kt Therrnaliber Inc 10 wwwAhermahbeccorn Standards Compliance Good Design Practices ASTM C665 Federal Specilicatiori HH I 21 F-- - Curtain Wali and Fiii Sm -j Insulalion as Types I,Ind III, Class A, Category 1 (0.02 perm tested in accordance wllh ASTM E96 procedure) - Safing Insulation as Types I and III. Class A. Category I SAFB Blankets as Type, I '.i ['lallkels as Type I - FS-M Hlankels as Type III. Class A Category 1 ASTM C612 Federal Specificahpn HH-1.558B- - Curtain Will Insulalion (all) and I'mi sivoi Insulation (all) as Types 1A & I B and 2 (0.02 perlll, tested ill accordance with ASTM E96 procedure) - Curtain Wall Insulation (CW 70, CW 90) and Fn{rsPArr Insulation as Types 3 and a (0.02 perm, lested m accotclance wdh ASTM E96 proc:ednre) - Safing Insulation as Types to & 1 B and 2 - Sound Attenuation Fire Blankets as Type 1 A ASTM E136 (rated noncombustible as delined by NFPA Standard 220 when tested according to ASTM E 136) - THERMAHHER Safing Insulation - THFRMAHBER Curtain Wall Insulation - THERMAFiRFn FiRESPAN and FiH[Sl'fkN SS Insulation - THERMAFIBER Sound Attenualinll Fire Blankets - THERMAFIRFR FS- 15 and FS-25 Blankets ASTM E814 or UL 1479 - Safing Insulation used in COnjnnclion with SMOKE SEAI Compound or with FIRECODE Compound, or other approved material in through-penetration lireslop systems. UL 2079 - Sating Insulation used in Conjunction with various fill, void or cavity materials such as sealants and caulks In Con- struction joint systems. ASTM C553 - TumMARBEH IIISUIaliOnS adsprb less than 1 °ro moisture by welghl and VOIEIIIIe Products are approved by New York Cily Board of Standards & Appeals - - Curtain Wall Insulation is approved by New York City Board of Standards & Appeals under BSA 214- 73-SM. BSA 338- 81-SM, BSA 782-81-SM, BSA 980-81-SM & accepted by MEA 209-82, Vol, II. - FmrsPAN Curlain Wall Insulation, MEA 189-93-M• MEA 190-93-M, MEA 209-82. Vol. II; Safing Insulation _BSA 39-74_SM MEA 209-82,-Vol. II. I vapor Retarders-In air conditioned buildings in localities where high humidity and temperatures predominate, consideration should be given to placing the vapor retarder on warm (outside) wall to prevent moisture condensation within the insulation. Actual placement of moisture barrier should be specified by a qualified professional engineer, based on local climatic conditions. 2 Ceilings-Insulalion should be carefully fitted around-nol over-recessed light fixtures. improperly covering fixtures with insulation causes heal to build Up, possibly resulting in lire. 3 Glass Spandrels-To prevent possible moisture problems and to minimize thermal build-up within the cavity, minimum 1 ° air space is required between glass spandrels and insulation behind them. 4 Exterior watts-Penetrations in exterior walls far windows, doors. outlets. HVAC, etc., must be sealed with sealant or tape. Foil tape also should be used with foil-laced product applications to close joints and repair damaged areas. Mechanical attachment of safing and curtain wall insulation is required to avoid dislodging because of all movement. pancculady fit tufted exterior walls without sheathing or barking 5 Test oata-Thermaliber Inc. will provide data for published lire, sound and structural systems designed and constructed according to its published specifications. Tests were conducted on curtain wall assemblies lire-protected Willi these products to meet performance renuiremenls specified by various agencies. System perfornlarlce following any subslIll lion of nlaleriats or compromise in assembly design cannot be certified and may resell in failure under critical conditions. I hermafiber Inc I I www the rmafiber.corn Other products available at Thermafiber: Additional Information For Further Inlonuahon Melrlc speclflcalions (ill Ihe$e IMItICIS, IIICIIIUInU Ihernlahbel Inc. wlli orowdle Inedhi Infilslalldaill sties. Cnnlarl ConVafsiohS UII lls III(XilloS and thennahbef Inc y;slenl5 Id fieip Specillers II1,11ri) Ihermaliber Inc flleolc desnio sites if, andnien Sales offices. prbdaclS all, avallahie III nleuir i'L'm,• :14F IFIRFR! dlnlanslydl5 rv ( rR•P: rhu maldL:r r 0^, Commercial Ihennal FS15. FS25. Curlaw Wall, FueSpan. SAF8, PnvacyGuard Sahnq Acoustical SAFE JnvacyGuard, Cur(am W?ll Fire Protective Curlaten Wall. Firespan Salinq, ,AFB, F,SIi FS25. 0k1111 Fixture Peolechon Kits Industrial Thermal: Industrial Felt, Industrial Board, Industrial Blanket, Bulk Wool, FRF, Kfac 1.9, PnvacyGuard, Kfac SR, Maritime Insulalion, Metal Mesh, 81 Insulation, FhermaTex 1800, ThermaWrap 80, Quick- Cote Cement, Super Shk Cement Acoustical: Industrial Fell, PnvacyGuard, Bulk Wook, ThermaTex 1800, ThermaWrap 80. BI Insulation, FRF Fire Proleclive Manlime Insulation Residential Thermal: Blowing Wool, Sidewall Spray, Foundation Wall Spray PnvacyGuard Acoustical: Blowing Wool, Sidewall,Spray, PrvacyGuard Fire Protective: Blowing Wool, Sideivall Spray Trademarks "Jolla N01P. The IOllormlp Va(ICmarF ; Used hryi:m I& shall not ire habk, lot Incalmnal All pnNltl(1s descntwo iRee may -1111 are owned b; linnol doer Inn k. anti cnnsefNlenhal narnaneS npecuy be avallabie ui an gerx)rgpN( Na+; In MI., w~ WI; 1, 1 (us: nI Iofhrecdly suslan""rl Itlf 1111 arty nlarkel5 Consult your local sale:: and hn,si'na Atr,,l(1,;f. Dino r• mss caused by applwalfrm of Inese olllce o! repfeseniaovr, Irf hnfl:ir,':. 4nan~e!. RC 1. S6$kI'A;.. 111t11IS 1101!11 ;Ir-c(udalN:e •rnih funeni iidWltaliffil tin r. , and L! r a nrinhn vi tin win, ,!,her !flan 4dll_n11;14, ,l iL:lh.: .it'll: tin: "i•, Ilhll,lr (1 uF, imp ~!4161V6 I nr H'?allh Ind !'I' .Inm 1! t,e~ - I,(rlllrl;IlP/ eVlilmly111111.(1I1;CiI:ICPII1F;mof hlalenal;ealervDala.ilel. rt'I,;nsi delCCbw' (Ionfi5 ,nr rCOm shall hr and North Amen::an Insulabrn nel.rnen waned unllls!: made m hlan facduret S As5rra7urNl lHARMA. ;r,gnrl 10 u5 vnlhln Intm ;3(II (h]y.5 11!allh and Salet; I ac(s I(v ri0rl. ant, hf m i I I Slarawhal Insuiallrnl, iJec new if(;:, salely First' r ollnrr firwo Srllell' anti alrnulnai h;n'erie NacliceS rlunn(1 rtanUlmq and nlsialhnfJ all oronUCIS and sysdenls lake necessary precautions anal vreal Nn,, aoplovva;? pershllal cni'ULII/I' CIIUIUmf•nl Is !IPCrh:r1 Rea(I (11310111:alelt daia shells ano waled Ilgaalurr art p!rhr„r„ ;,I;Inn. 51!eclhf ablNl ;i:;II r:: ",:I:alannc r (.l C I MIS IN h.a,nnaN. sliou,d ~ 1 I V I' Wes' A9111 Slrcr; Wahash.IM 46y92 86e. ~ I fo 'uldihon NI TPC1111fC tl Ilenn811o'1 SIJC (:1d11011S ]1111 CAD t)I VIII` see n~ - - 1 • ' rm..e Iherntahher (.fun ' 1dad1 II the llaA - . , mnrunn~ ~~rnlnc Cf s.:ecr.cm~ Thermafiber Inc It Www lhermaiibercorn Sa70711 -04 Copyrighl 200x. Ihermaliber. Inc. prlnled In the 1.1 S n To Whom Bt May Concern. Hilti i=irestop Systems - Perimeter Joint riresto Systems et the Four Seasons Residence Ciub, Vail This letter is to explain the details of Hilti Firestop Perimeter Joint Systems and the application for the Four Seasons Residence Club, Vail. At the Four Seasons Residence Club project the exterior fapade system consists of steel stud framing between the post-tensioned concrete slabs. These steel studs can overlap the edge of the concrete slab up to max 3" to ensure that the exterior sheathing panels (e.g. DensGlass or similar) and the exterior finish can be attached to the outside of the steel studs in a straight line. This overlap creates a potential smoke leak between the slab edge and the external sheathing panels through which smoke could spread from one floor to the next above in a fire scenario. Analyzing the code requirements IBC 2003 states the following for the situation of a joint between a fire-rated floor and a non-rated exterior wall. 713.4 Exterior curtain wall floor intersection. Where fire resistance-rated floor or floor/ceiling assemblies are required, voids created at the intersection of the exterior curtain wall assemblies and such floor assemblies shall be sealed with an approved material or system to prevent the interior spread of fire. Such material or systems shall be securely installed and capable of preventing the passage of flame and hot gases sufficient to ignite cotton waste where subjected to ASTM E 119 time-temperature fire conditions under a minimum positive pressure differential of 0.01 inch (0.254 mm) of water column (2.5 Pa) for the time period at least equal to the fire-resistance rating of the floor assembly. Height and fire-resistance requirements for curtain wall spandrels shall comply with Section 704.9." IBC 2006 clarifies the situation even more by adding the reference to an ASTM test standard "or installed as tested in accordance with AS TM E 2307 for the time period at least equal to the fire- resistance rating of the floor assernblv." HIM, Inc. 5400 South 122°° East Avenue Tulsa. OK 7,1146 i-800-8i9-8000 www.hilti.com is This code text does not specify any minimum gap or void between the exterior curtain wall assembly and the floor assembly. ii addresses any gap that could be a potential smoke leaf: or risk for the spread of the fire. In case of the Four Seasons Residence Club project I would suggest to install a Firestop system tested according to ASTM E 2307 offering the required safety for the building against any fire or smoke spread during a fire scenario. This tested system could be ETL Intertek system CEJ 425 P (see attached) or a system based on a Hilti Engineering Judgment as per the drawing below (Hilti Engineering Judgment is in process for the project, the exact details will be specified on the Engineering Judgment). Hilti, Inc. 5400 South 122" East Avenue ?ultra. OIC 74146 1-800-87g-8o00 www hilli.com The correct installation or the proposed Rrestop system tested according to ASTM E 2307 will ensure the maximum level of safety for the building as required by the building code. If you need any further information please contact me at your convenience. L Marco Fischer Fire Protection Specialist Colorado / Utah Hilti North America 5400 S. 122nd E. Ave I Tulsa, OK 74146 P 800-879-8000 1 F 918- 459- 18151 M 303-229-4778 E marco.fischer@hilti.com www.us.hilti.com Denver, November 25th 2008 Hilti, Inc. 5400 South 12200 East Avenue Tulsa ',)K 74146 I-800-879-8000 www hiiti.com IYSr i0 PERIMETER FIRE 3ARRIER SYSTEM AS Ni E 230-04 Section '14.2 Fire-Resistance T-Rating - 1 hr. F-Rating - 2 hr. HEAD OF WALL JOINT SYSTEM Al ( E 230;-04 Section i4.? Movement Rated for ± 0% horizontal movement Rated for -100% downward vertical shear movement (314 inch) Class 11 500 Cycles Rated for + 0% upward vertical shear movement (OPTIONAL BOX SILL) T SYS' JOINT SYSTEM w L; w c~ Reproduced by HILTI, inc. .Ourtes of Intertek. Group April 20, 2007 1 Paqe: 1 of 5 EXTERIOR HEAD OF WALL PERIJVIETER FIRE BARRIER S11S71=lVI ASTM 1= 2307-04 Section 14.2 Fire-Resistance T-Rating - 1 hr. F-Ratinq - 2 hr. HEAD OF WALL JOINT SYSTEM µ.S, TM 'J 0 - iii: S ection 14.1 Movement Rated for ± 0% horizontal movement Rated for - 100% downward vertical shear movement (314 inch) Class 11500 Cycles Rated for + 0% upward vertical shear movement 1. CONCRETE FLOOR ASSEMBLY: Minimum two-hour rated concrete floor assembly (Item 1) made from either lightweight or normal weight concrete with a density of 100-150 pcf, with a minimum thickness of 4 to 4-1/2-inches, respectively, at the slab edge (joint face). Optional - Provided the two-hour concrete floor assembly (Item 1) rating is not compromised, the overall slab thickness may vary to accommodate various blockout depths (longitudinal recesses) formed in the concrete, to house an optional architectural joint system. The blockout width may also vary without restriction. 2. CURTAIN WALL ASSEMBLY: The curtain wall assembly shall incorporate the following construction features: A. Mounting Attachment: (Not shown) Attach the steel-stud framing to the structural framing according to the curtain wall manufacturers instructions. When required, connect the mounting attachments to the concrete floor assembly (Item 1) at the slab edge (joint face), according to the curtain wall manufacturer's instructions. Use a maximum 10-foot distance between mounting attachments. B. Steel-Stud Framing: Use minimum 6-inch by 1-5/8-inch, 16 GA steel "C" studs cut to length as vertical framing members spaced a maximum of 16-inches on center, secure the ends of the steel studs in compatible sized 20 GA steel tracks, using minimum #6 x -1/2-inch pan or hex head screws. Cantilever the floor track nominally 2-inches past the vertical face of the concrete floor assembly (Item 1). Secure the floor track to the top of the concrete floor assembly (Item 1) with 1/4-inch diameter x 2-inch long concrete screws (or either powder actuated fasteners or steel expansion bolts having equivalent strength and performance) spaced a maximum of 24-inches on center. Insert the ceiling track inside the "slip-track (deflection channel)" to create a 3/4-inch gap between channels to allow for downward movement. Alternate Lighter Gauge Slotted Ceiling Track: Alternate to ceiling track above, use minimum 24 GA galvanized steel channel with slotted flanges sized to accommodate minimum 6-inch by 1-5/8-inch, 16 GA steel "C" studs. Alternate Framing Box Sill: Alternate to steel-stud framing (Item 2B) created between window assembly and top of the concrete floor assembly (Item 1), use multiple minimum 16 GA galvanized structural steel tracks or steel studs placed horizontally and secured together using minimum #6 x 1/2-inch pan or hex head screws or welds and capped top and bottom with floor and ceiling tracks or use multiple minimum 16 GA galvanized punched steel tracks or steel studs with all openings sealed with mineral wool placed horizontally and secured together using minimum #6 x 1/2-inch pan or hex head screws or welds and capped top and bottom with floor and ceiling tracks. C. Slip-Track (Deflection Channel): As part of the exterior wall assembly (Item 2) and head of wall joint system, attach a minimum 16 GA channel, sized to accommodate steel-stud framing (Item 2B), to the bottom of the concrete floor assembly (Item 1) using 1/4-inch diameter x 2-inch long concrete screws spaced nominally 12-inches on center. Cantilever the slip-track (deflection channel) nominally 2-inches past the vertical face of the concrete floor assembly (Item 1). The cantilevered tracks (Items 2B & 2C) create a minimum 4-inch deep by z-inch wide reveal. Attach reinforcing angle (item 3C) to top of slip-track (deflection channel). Create an exterior maximum 3/4-inch horizontal joint (exterior head of wall joint system) at the slip-track (deflection channel) after the sandwiched wall surface (Item 2D) is installed. Form the joint using two juxatopsed edges of the sandwiched wall surface (Item 2D) as the sides and create the back of the joint using the exposed steel face of slip-track (deflection channel) (Item 2C). Locate the 3/4-inch horizontal joint directly below and parallel to the perimeter joint protection (Item 3). Optional Joint System: Install a nominal 1/2-inch polyethylene backer rod into the 3/4-inch horizontal joint in contact with the steel face of slip-track (deflection channel. Cover the nominal 1/2-inch polyethylene backer rod using a silicone, endothermic, or intumescent sealant. Only Intertek Certified Sealant Manufacturer's product meeting the above minimum requirements. D. Sandwiched Wall Surface: Install packing material (Item 3A) and reinforcing angle (Item 3C), then apply and secure a minimum 5/8-inch thick, 48-inch wide by 96-inch long, exterior grade fiberglass sheathed gypsum board to steel stud framing (Item 2B) with minimum 1-1/4-inch long Type S drywall screws 12-inch on center in field and 8-inch on center at perimeter created by the cantilevered tracks (Items 2B & 2C). Do not attach exterior grade fiberglass sheathed gypsum board to slip-track (deflection channel) (Item 2C). Alternate Cementitious Backer Units: Use minimum 5/8-inch thick cement based boards attached to steel stud framing (Item 2B) with minimum 1-1/4-inch long Type S drywall screws 12-inches on center in field and 8-inches on center at perimeter created by the cantilevered tracks (Items 2B & 2C). Do not attach 5/8-inch thick cement based boards to slip-track (deflection channel) (Item 2C). Butt all edges of all 5/8-inch thick cement based boards tightly together and cover joints with glass fiber mesh tape covered with compatible cementitous coating. a. c Reproduced by HILTI Inc. t )urtesy pf interte!< Grout, tipril 20, 2007 j ;Page: of 5 RERIfVIETER FIRE FARRIER SYSTEIVi ASTIVI E 2307-04 Section 14.2 l=ire-Resistance T-Rating - 1 hr. F-Ratina - 2 hr. HEAD OF WALL JOINT SYSTEM PILTM E 2307-04 Section 14.1 Movement Rated for ± 0% horizontal movement Rated for - 100% downward vertical shear movement (314 inch) Class 11 500 Cycles Rated for + 0% upward vertical shear movement E. Optional Vision Glass Panels: Size and install glass panels into curtain wall framing according to the curtain wall system manufacturer's guidelines. Use a min. 1/4 inch thick, clear, heat-strengthened (HS) glass or tempered glass sized for the window framing, which allows the vision glass panels to be secured between the notched shoulder of the framing and pressure bar. When required by the manufacturer, secure vision glass panels with a thermal break (rubber extrusion), pressure bar (aluminum extrusion), min. 114-20 x 518 in. long screws, and a snap face (aluminum extrusion). Optional Window Framing: Framing material shall be non-combustible. Locate window framing at least 4-112 inches above the top surface of the floor assembly. F. Optional Curtain Wall Clips: (Not shown) When desired, affix minimum 20 GA 1 x 1-inch steel angle using 5/8-inch long sheet metal screws to the vertical framing (Item 2B) and to the surface of the concrete floor assembly (Item 1) using minimum Y4-inch diameter by 1-inch long concrete screws. G. Optional Curtain Wall Insulation: (Not shown) When desired, install curtain wall insulation above or below the perimeter joint protection (Item 3). When used, secure the insulation in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. Mineral wool or glass fiber batt insulations are acceptable. Only Intertek Certified Mineral Wool Manufacturer's product meeting the above minimum requirements. H. Optional Interior Curtain Wall Surface: (Not shown) When desired, install an interior curtain wall surface above or below the perimeter joint protection (Item 3). When used, secure the interior curtain wall surface in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. Gypsum board is acceptable. 1. Exterior Curtain Wall Finish: (Not shown) The exterior finish shall not create voids or openings in the sandwiched wall surface and shall extend at least 4-inches above and at least 24-inches below the surface of the concrete floor assembly (Item 1). The following finishes are acceptable: (1) Exterior Insulation Finish System: When desired, use any Listed and Labeled EIFS composed of an expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam insulation, and an Exterior Curtain Wall Finish consisting of the following: A plaster, base coat and reinforcing mesh applied over the sandwiched wall surface. Precut the mesh as needed. The mesh is a woven fiberglass reinforcement fabric that is compatible with the plaster base coat and finish coat materials. Apply 1/16 to 1/8-inch thick plaster base coat to the exposed surface of the EPS foam. The EPS foam boards nominally measure 24 inches wide by 48 inches long by a maximum of 4 inches thick with a nominal density of 1 pcf. The EPS foam is attached to the sandwiched wall surface (Item 2D) using mechanical fasteners or an adhesive in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. Install the EPS boards in a running bond (brick-like) pattern and staggered over sandwiched wall surface (Item 2D) joints. Apply pressure to the EPS boards to assist in the bonding process. All EPS boards must be butted together with no gaps or voids between them. Allow a minimum of 12 hours before continuing the application process when using adhesive. The EPS boards must be rasped to remove all irregular seams and establish a continuous flat surface. Apply the mesh over the EPS; embed the mesh into the plaster base coat using a trowel. Start at the middle and work outwards towards edges. The final thickness of the plaster base coat with the mesh embedded should be approximately 1/16-inches. Let the base coat dry completely before applying the plaster finish coat. The plaster finish coat is a gypsum based wall coating which may contain silica sand or marble aggregates. Apply the plaster finish coat using a trowel in the same manner as the plaster base coat. Other installation techniques are acceptable when detailed by the manufacturer. The EIFS system is a monolithic assembly without expansion or control joints. Only Intertek Certified EIFS Manufacturer's product meeting the above minimum requirements. (2) Glass Panels: Size and install glass panels into curtain wall framing according to the curtain wall system manufacturer's guidelines. Use a min. 1/4 in. thick, clear, heat-strengthened (HS) glass or tempered glass with a max. width and height less than the framing o.c. spacing, which allows the glass to be secured between the notched shoulder of the framing and pressure bar. Panels are secured with a thermal break (rubber extrusion), pressure bar (extrusion), min. 1/4-20 x 5/8 in. Iona screws, and a snap face (extrusion) or other manner as detailed by the manufacturer. The system iS a monolithic assembly without expansion or control joints. C_ -,r U-1 C-) Reproduced by HILTI. inc. Ourtesy of Intertek Group I April 20 2007 RERIIVIETER FIRE BARRIER Si'STE{UI ASTM E 2307-04 Section 14.2 Fire-Resistance T-Ratina - "I hr. F-Rating - 2 hr. HEAD OF WALL JOINT SYSTEM S-71Vi _ 2307-04 Sectior, 14.1 Movement Rated for ± 0% horizontal movement Rated for "100% downward vertical shear movement (3/4 inch) 'lass. 11 500 _-ycles Rated for + 0% upward vertical shear movement (3) Aluminum Panels: Minimum 1l8-inch thick, aluminum panels secured to the steel-stud framing (Item 213) in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions. When framing for the aluminum panels is required, it is to be installed with the manufacturer's installation instructions. The system is a monolithic assembly without expansion or control joints. (4) Brick: Use any conventional brick; and mortar type. Any brick; pattern is acceptable. Mortar joints not to exceed 7/8-inches. Secure bricks to wall assembly using conventional acceptable masonry construction techniques. The system is a monolithic assembly without expansion or control joints. (5) Stucco: Any Listed and Labeled stucco system is acceptable provided that the following is abided by: When EPS is used, the EPS foam boards nominally measure a maximum of 4 inches thick with a nominal density of 1 pcf. The stucco manufacturer confirms the stucco is compatible with the sandwiched wall surface. The system is a monolithic assembly without expansion or control joints. (6) Stone: Use any conventional stone panel and mortar type measuring at least 1-inch thick. Any stone pattern is acceptable. Mortar joints not to exceed 7/8-inches. Secure stones to wall assembly using conventional acceptable masonry construction techniques. The system is a monolithic assembly without expansion or control joints. (7) Siding: Any Listed and Labeled siding system is acceptable provided that the following is abided by: The siding shall be classified as non-combustible. The system is a monolithic assembly without expansion or control joints. (8) GFRC Panels: Glass fiber reinforced concrete panels shall be at least 1-inch thick and attached in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. The system is a monolithic assembly without expansion or control joints. (9) Roofing Materials: Any Listed and Labeled Class A bituminous roofing material applied in accordance with manufacturer's installation instructions. Only Intertek Certified Roofing Manufacturers product meeting the above minimum requirements. 3. PERIMETER JOINT PROTECTION: The perimeter joint (linear opening) shall not exceed a 2 in. nom. joint width (joint width at installation) between the interior face of the sandwiched wall surface and the vertical face of the concrete floor assembly. The perimeter joint treatment shall incorporate the following construction features: A. Packing Material: Use a minimum 4 inch thick, 4 pcf density, mineral wool batt insulation. Install the top surface of the packing material flush with the top and bottom surface of the concrete floor assembly (Item 1). Only Intertek Certified Mineral Wool Manufacturer's product meeting the above minimum requirements. Compress the lengths of packing material together at least 1/2-inch at splices (butt joints). Install packing material (Item 3A) using the following method: Install the packing material in the reveal created by the cantilevered tracks (Items 2B above the floor & 2C below the floor) and reinforcing angle (Item 3C). Install pieces of packing material (Item 3A) with fibers running vertically with the slip-track (deflection channel) (Item 2C). Cut lengths of the packing material a minimum of 4-1/4-inch high by minimum 2-1/4-inch wide for minimum 4-inch by 2-inch reveal. Use proportionate packing material for larger reveals, Overlap and compress the ends of the lengths of the packing material a minimum of 1/4-inch to be butted together. B. Fill, Void or Cavity Material: Spray or brush apply liquid in two locations: (1) over the interface of the inside vertical leg of the of the floor track (Item 2B) and the concrete floor assembly (Item 1) and (2) over the interface of the outside vertical leg of the floor track (Item 2B) and the inside face of the sandwiched wall surface (Item 2D). Fill, Void or Cavity material is not required behind the vertical studs. Application of the material is to start and stop on each side of each vertical stud. When alternate box sill is used, spray or brush apply liquid in two locations: (1) over the interface of the inside vertical face of the of the box sill (Item 2B) and the concrete floor assembly (Item 1) and (2) over the interface of the top of the box, sill (Item 2B) and the inside face of the sandwiched wall surface (Item 2D). Apply a minimum wet film thickness of 1/8 inch and overlap the material a minimum 112 inch onto the adjacent curtain wall assembly (Item 2) and concrete floor assembly (Item 1). When the brushing or spraying process is stopped and the applied liquid cures to an elastomeric film before application process is restarted, then overlap the edge of the cured material at ieasi 1/8 inch with the fresh material. Listed fJianufacturer. Hilti. Inc. Joint Sealant Spray CP 672 Firestop Joint Spray Reproduced by HILTI. Inc. s ( ,ourtesyof intertel:.;roull °.pril 20. -uu0 i =ilra-stc,p SVS-69 S -aae , o iD ?ERINIETER __;RE ~ RRIER SYSTEM ASTNI E X307-04 Section 14.2 Fire-Resistance T-Rating - 1 hr. F-Ratinq - 2 hr. HEAD OF WALL JOINT SYSTEM !.STNi = 2067-04 Section ',4,.' Movement Rated for ± 0% horizontal movement Rated for - 100% downward vertical shear movement ,314 inch) Class 11 500 Circles Rated for + 0% upward vertical shear movement C. Reinforcing Angle: Mount a minimum 20 GA, 1-1/2 inch x 3/4 inch galvanized steel angle continuously to the top of the slip-track (deflection channel) (Item 2C) using minimum # 6 r. 112" framing screws with pan or hex head nominally 24-inches on center. Screws heads located on bottom of slip-track Position the reinforcing angle so that the 314 inch horizontal leg attaches the exposed top of the cantilevered slip-track (deflection channel) (Item 2C) and the 1-112 inch vertical leg is plumb with outside cantilevered edge of the floor track (Item 2B) above. Alternate: Mirror location from above mounting. Mount a minimum 20 GA, 1-1/2 inch x 3/4 inch galvanized steel angle continuously to the bottom track (Item 213) using minimum #6 x 1.25-inch pan or hex head head SD PT screws nominally 24-inches on center. Position the reinforcing angle so that the 3/4 inch horizontal leg attaches the exposed bottom of the cantilevered bottom track (Item 2B) and the 1-1/2 inch vertical leg is plumb with outside cantilevered slip-track (deflection channel) (Item 2C) below. D. Steel Cover and Base: (Not shown) Use nominal 6-inch by 2-inch, 16 GA steel "C" channel, bottom track (Item 2B), to cover the packing material (Item 3A) and use nominal 6-inch by 2-inch, 16 GA steel "C" channel, slip-track (deflection channel) (Item 2C), to support the packing material (Item 3A). E. Optional Impaling Pins: (Not shown) When desired, use 12 GA steel pins swaged to nominal 2 x 2 inch galvanized steel base plate affixed maximum 16-inches on center to edge of concrete floor assembly (Item 1). i L=M1:j I Reproduced by HILTI. Inc. Courtesy of Intertel< Group April 20, 2007 I-Iaqe: 5 of 5 H r. J I I i ~ ~ H I G+1f h.~ h r W i w. 4 ?i ~ I _ _ tE ti CON RA TOR ; DIV!SI0K1 1 RA. TING 1-HR. OR _-HR. (ScE IiIC T E IBC. 2 BEL.CIAn 1. EXTERIOR GYPSUM WITH STEEL STUDS CURTAIN WALL ASSEMBLY (NON FIRE-RATED). 2. CONCRETE FLOOR ASSEMBLY (MINIMUM 4-112" THICK) (1-HR. OR 2-HR. FIRE-RATING). 3. MINIMUM 3-112" THICKNESS MINERAL WOOL (MIN. 4 PCF DENSITY) COMPRESSED 33%, FLUSH WITH TRACK SURFACE. 4. MINIMUM 118" (WET) THICKNESS HIL T ! OP 672 SPEED SPRAY TO COMPL E T ELY COVER MINERAL WOOL AND OVERLAPPING MINIMUM 112' ONTO CONCRETE FLOOR AND CURTAIN WALL. NOTES : 1. MAXIMUM WIDTH OF JOINT = 3". ,FIRE-RATING OF ASSEMBL IS ONL~' AS GOOD AS PERFORMANCE OF CURTAIN WALL ASSEMBLY UNDER FIRE CONDITIONS. THIS ENGINEERING JUDGN1E JT R PRESENTS A iKESTOP SYS T Eiui THAT WOULD aE E PEGTFu TO PASS THE STATED RATINGS ir" TEST:D, (REFERENCE : INTERTEK SYSTEM NC. CEJ 421 P & CEJ 425 P) HILTI. Inc. Sheet ~ of 1 Drawilnc Ivr Tulsa Oldanoma USA (800) 879-8000 f " Scaie 114" = V. i uesioned bi- ~;eftf pilC... _ -aCL•^, ,-3ms Dato ff 1 44 .ter`' ~4 Nov. 25. 2008 ~I 'ii' . f~ Cv'`~L.. r Saving Lives tl,arctugh Innovation and Education I CROSS-5EO ZONAL 1`IEW Introduction to THERMAFIFER Ir1SUl&II011S offer superior fire protection (hrough the ability of our mineral fibers to resist temperatures. up to 2,000 *F TRERMAFIREfC 11.0J3 °C) 3y contrast, glass fiber insulallons begin to disulfeglale al about 1,050 Products r (565 - - SUBMIT !C BMr"'~ 'VJN Advantages Noncor ibusllble pet `,l~uldaids NFPA 220 AS1TO f H k; (i VIE"A' OF G-KRA' COQ THA' ~JMPI IAN AfdD DUE; h - Impedes smoke passage-with foil lacing and SMU>I Compound RELEASE THE SUBCONTRACTOF: AND/% 31UPP' IEr: "ROW,^0MP YI - Dry ronslucdoll -ccdn be metalled all vcar :oluul - ' 'fir r,itil' hi~n9r ' ` I hu IO F PI (i!' ~?f~ flk, - Nonasbeslos AWIL OF PUR_`v MISi'-ORD..g~r •4'Gr`tEEMEEN v. OF DKE", "I i1I RE ;.E/ t/OISIIJfe fp$ISlalll-er1S rb;; less than one" pelcielli 11101stuf(I MHE i~Rl~ Ii!Mi9Ti OF trc61UU~3l3 ailllt) r (f~` .:i111l,Cit4„° P• tt Noncorroswe, nondefenoraliny, mildev:i prool and veunurproof-,;(ay i1f91~~t~hproi)lems Durahle-provides long-term retention of insulating value;; COAITRAC TORT SIGNATURE Product Uses Commercial Insulations-Exterior wall Insulahon reduces heal Iransolisslon, save:, energy and Improves OCCnpanl comfort (see page 10 for more, Information). Sound and Fire Control-Enhances Sound attenuation and fire proleclion in partitions and floor-ceiling assemblies (see pages 8-9 lot more infoilia tion). Curtain Wall Fire/Smoke Containment--Contains fire and impedes smoke between floors at the slab edge/Curtain wall interface in addition to providing insulation for the exterior walls to conserve energy. (These curtain wall insulations are further described on pages 2-7). Green Building Material-Recycled content of Thermafiber products exceeds EPA requirements of 75% for building insulation with 85% the typical level of recovered materials. THERMAHBER Curtain Wall Insulations Designed for use in curtain will assemblies, these products provide key features for fire containment applications: and Accessories - Proven history of performance for more than 30 years - Requires positive mechanical attachment for aluminum-framed systems - Optional dark colored or black-coal laced product for backing glass spandrel panels Regular Curtain Wall Or FIRESPAN INSLIlaiion FSP Curtain Wall or FIRESPAN Insulation fps apt Dark Curtain Wall or FIRESPAN Insulation Oil The Gpvel Regular Curtain Wall or FIRESPAN 111$ulallOll comes as Sena rigid blankels of untar..ed fell lot backing spaodlet panels of opaque nlalenal wnlere no vapor retardel is needed, or coverlny slruclurel 1111,1111011S as fequire(f it) the cunaln wall checklisis on page a FSP Curtain Wall or FIRESPAN Insulalion is file Sinlle aS regular Curtain tvilll Insulation WIIII a lough scrim-leinfoicecf toil lacing that serve's as a vapor letardet The facing also adds durabilily lot lield installation. Dark Conant Wall or FIRESPAN Insulahon IS Similar to regular curtail Wall IIsualion excepl II has it darker Color for ITaCkmg dark "colored glass spandrel panels. Using dark Insulation inslea(I of light Insulahon Improves the, look of the assembly. Because file combine(I effects of Color and Shading can be unpfediclable. it lull-Scale mock-1111 of the ulSUlaled spandrel Is regwwd to ensure desired appemilllCP fop Photo Fern Tunes Square. Nevi YOII,. New York. ArcndP,cl: Fox A Fowle Aichllects, PC. Products III!wrAHRrii" CW90 Curfaln Wall loSIIiallnn: TrffNLrAHhH;' ;dinn I1 tr j1i1)n Tni rnc,Vn!I ;1'Jhll!::I S., Lonloellllp fhermaliber Inc THENMAnIER This product is designed to be compallble vvilh Safing Insulation and hrFPrAdPiiim Curtain Wall or FincSvw Insulation Salting Impaling "Z" Clips ul perimeter applications, but is also used in PI n(_: h(in sale -oil appllcalions anal (';iler lire. IIiC.P_ Nl ;i1.CmnlleS ) b I SMOKE SEAL" Compound and FIREcom Compound These products are caulking iSuoKr SEAL Compound) and monar-lype (FIRECOnE Compound) the/smoke slop nnaleriafs used as lopping over TREeMAPBER Safing Insulation in various applications. Middle Photo' hP. Promenade. Allanta (;enrgua Arrlulerl fhompson. Veniuleil. SlMnback As;oraates t'IUdur:C;. Il:rara;d?pr.l.- (:ni!alr- Y:'nf: and I'll l+!.urrsll. ;ahnn insutatun2 Bottom Photo: San Francisco Civic Center Complex. San Francisco. CA AfChlec,. ,kioorore. Ovnnns Merrill I LP Owner Sall fmnclscu State Bulfdilio Auuwll(V Produrls TtinLin.nrin`Firespan Insulahon. I urld.+td;t;!.i~` ;affnq Insuldtioll, FnP i.UmpOUn(', rp Hra;.rllEb: 3000d Fillenllallofl Flrr, R!ZmkelS www.thermafibercom v"~ TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Permit # B06-0196 Project PRJ03-0468 Job Address: I VAIL RD VAIL Status ISSUED Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD Applied..: 07/18/2006 Parcel No...: 210107101016 Issued. 12/08/2008 Expires. 09/26/2007 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR LAYTON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC 9090 S. SANDY PARKWAY SANDY UTAH 84040 License: 333-A APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS 600 FOSHAY TOWER 821 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 License: 0000001981 07/19/2006 07/19/2006 Phone: (801) 568-9090 07/19/2006 Phone: 612-332-1500 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Occupancy Type NIGHT CLUBS (A2) ZONE 4 IB CHURCHES (A3) ZONE 4 IB BUSINESS(B)& HMP (H5 ZONE 4 IB EDUCATIONAL (E) ZONE 4 IB INDUSTRIAL/MOD HAZ ( ZONE 4 IB MERCANTILE (M) ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/HOTELS ( ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/MULTFAM( ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/MOD HAZ (S1) ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/LOW HAZ(S2) ZONE 4 IB Totals... Factor Sq Feet Valuation 299.08 27,353 $8,180,735.24 369.90 8,605 $3,182,989.50 300.40 31,130 $9,351,452.00 322.53 670 $216,095.10 183.77 29,600 $5,439,592.00 220.56 2,445 $539,269.20 302.22 86,991$26,290,420.02 250.22 133,695$33,453,162.90 169.75 23,080 $3,917,830.00 167.15 75,773$12,665,456.95 399,510$103,237,002.9* TOV Adjusted Valuation: 3,237,002.91 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $237,002.91 *r*s****a**:*****ass*:*****+*++**ass*aa********:*+**+*******+** FEE SUMMARY ***********+"**aaasasaa*ssssss**ss*»*ssss*sassasassasasss Building > 378, 777.45 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees 157, 177. 90 Plan Check 378, 777.45 Recreation Fee--------------> 399, 510. 00 Additional Fees-----------> $4,200.00 Investigation-> . , $0. 00 TOTAL FEES > 157, 177.90 Total Permit Fee---------- > 161, 377. 90 Will Call-----> $3 . 00 Payments > 161, 377.90 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0.00 ~»....s.+.■..s.+**s*s**+*►*s.*+**►*s*r***~+*++►.►.~.+.*..*~*~.*~:.+.**+.•+.~..*...:*.++.~..~.+..~*■*...■:.**~.#.*~**...**~+~s+.+.**..++~r.re.ss.+ Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e-mailed to applicant. 12/18/2006 cdavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set for plan c by TOV 12/13/06. An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer. 03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR:1215- G&E permit approval only. Conditic 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only 06/12/2007 CDAVIS Action: PA Tower Crane footing pads. No additional fees assessed 07/16/2007 jplano Action: CR Additional work being requested to be adde( phasing, correction letter sent. 08/01/2007 jplano Action: CR Second correction letter sent, insuttient supplied. 3) The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design protessioi architect and/or engineer. The design protessionals are to verify that the additi( being requested is not in conflict with the corrections that are requested regard: building permit. All sheets are to be stamped and signed by the associated design protessional. The architectural and the plumbing sheets have not been stamped. The stamp on the stri sheets has not been signed. The stamp on the electrical sheets has not been signe( 4 There is insufficient detail to approve this submittal. Some examples are: a) There are several sections that are pertinent to this request that are not pro' b) The elevator pit sections 10/S4.04, 18/S4.04, 19/S4.04, 20/S4.04 are missing. c) Ramp transition section 22/S6.01, 6/S6.01, 7/S4.04 are missing d) Exterior foundation wall connection to the matt slab 9/S6.01D, 27/S6.01, 6/S.0: 7/S6.01 e) Sump pit details 28/S4.04 and 29/S4.04 f) Column schedule, transition of the columns to slab? g) Slab steps 11/S6.01D. This review has stopped because of lack of information. 5 The Public Works Department in Vail has not approved the submittal for additionz be added to the phasing. Their approval will be necessary. 08/06/2007 jplano Action: PA Additional work approved for phasing. Under plumbing, underground electrical, rebar and concrete placement for elevator and si APPROVAL FOR MAT SLAB 09/11/2007 jplano Action: AP 10/22/2007 DPLACE Action: PA No charge. 10/22/2007 dplace Action: PA 11/13/2007 ependley Action: AP stamps. No added valuation. 11/15/2007 ependley Action: AP Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 11/30/2007 jplano Action: AP Full permit approved, see conditions REV 4 IR 5881: Approved shop drawings for REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONA] REV5/IR6042. Approved shop drawings for de: Rev7/IR6058. Approved RFI-0237, No added vi Rev6/IR6057. Approved RFI-0221, No added vE AddQd pl4n review fee of $60.00 due 12/18/2007 JPLANO Action: AP Rev9/IR6236. Approved shop drawings for po: slabs, no added valuation 12/26/2007 jplano Action: AP Rev10/IR6252. Approved changing a post ten: with thickened slab. $120.00 due 12/27/2007 MROYER Action: AP Revll/IR6266,6267. Rebar shop drawings rev: appropiate stamps, no charge 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA REV 12 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER LAYTON S[ #05510-004 (EMBEDS @ LEVEL 1, 2, 3 ns 4) FROM JT STEEL NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA EV.13 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER SUBMITTAL (STUD RAILS, LEVELS 4 & 5) FROM SUNCOAST NO ADDTIONAL CHARGE 06/10/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev14,15,16, IR6685,6687,7744 are approved of plan review due, $720.00 07/08/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 19, IR 7989 are approved, Bulletins 10,25,29,31,35,40 - 8 hours of plan review due, $480.00 08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev17, IR 7777 are approved, Bulletins 023 swimming pool revisions, $360 due 08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 20, IR8245 are approved, storm and sew( connetions outside the building, public works has approved it. No charge trom Sat( 09/29/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev18, IR7988 are approved. The sub-duct s-, the dryers and range hoods are not approved. 46 hours of plan review due = $2760.( 12/04/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev21/IR9008 - This is the revised ADMOD t( wood above 401. This is to be approved by the tire department to be issued. No chE Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the He Utility relocation permit request. The applicant shall remove only those trees wh: absolutely necessary for the utility relocation work. 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the al to dewater the site. 03/31/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning recieved a bond to cover the Grad: Excavation in the amount of 3.2 million. Planning has approved the grading and ex( permit. 06/25/2007 Warren Action: COND Planning has approved the tull building pei dated recieved on May 29, 2007, with a single condition. A complete Design Review will need to be submitted for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs the pool deck to West Meadow Drive. 08/20/2007 Warren Action: AP The set of plans provided to allow tro the some work prior to release of a tull building permit has been approved. The plans stamped July 26, 2007 09/05/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning is approving the set of plans dat( 2007, with the condition that the applicant submits a revised landscaping plan toi approval prior to requesting a TCO. 11/02/2007 GRUTHER Action: AP REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAI 06/12/2008 Warren Action: AP The planning departmetn signs ott on Bullei 23A with one condition. The gate on teh new set of stairs shal be as the base of t on the pool deck not on the top of the stairs adjacent to Meadow Drive. 09/26/2008 Warren Action: CR Regarding the above permit my only comment need a detail of the gate at the top of the stairs serving as an exit trom the po( This detail shall be depict the desired gate which tits not only the aesthetics of Season but that of the Meadow Drive streetscape. The design should take into accoi for security trom the public side of the tence and be design with this in mind. F( the Town does not want to see a nice gate submitted, approved, and installed and t of security reason we add a piece of plexi-glass to the gate as an atterthought. are dated 5-8-08 Bullentin #40. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding. Review: Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied: 1. Fire Dept staging on south side of the west end. The hydrant on the west side. Sheet A0.3.00 2. Sheet A0.3.05 does not show an acc Fire Command Center. 3. The plans submitted by RJA are not 4. The plans show a dead end corridor project is shown on east end. The apporved end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on °ptable route to the interior of the buildinc stamped and are labeled "Not for Constructic behind the front desk. 5. 12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is gi Relocate electrical disconnect to site. Location as proposed on pla 03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: 07/11/2007 McGee Action: as submitted 7 11 07. 09/07/2007 McGee Action: the z su PA AP AP AP trailer or provide ready access on southwest omitted 12/13/06 is not accepted. g and e permit is approved For G & E only Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3A approved for 1_ The full permit is approved as noted: Life Safety Report 5 22 07 1. LSR, MOU's, and Admin Mod's must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protect_ of Record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not RJA alledgedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence ha: presented. 3. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans, is not accepted. 5. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to addition 12/08/2008 MAH Action: AP Rev21/IR9008 - This is the revised ADMOD fc wood above 401. This is to be approved by the fire department to be issued. No chi SB. PER VERBAL FROM MIKE VAUGHAN, OK TO APPROVE FOR FIRE. Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 10/20/2006 is Action: DN Awaiting for additional information 12/20/2006 is Action: PA Approval to allow grading and prep work foi installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for t access for small construction vehicles ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive. 03/26/2007 is Action: PA Staging plan for Phase 1 of the G&E permit oni,y. Eggineer approval for the G&E permit still required currently under review. staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only 08/07/2007 csaiii Action: AP additional work proposed for phased permit no approval for mat slab 09/13/2007 csalli Action: DN waiting for executed MOU 10/04/2007 TK Action: AP Approved Building Permit with the condtion: the memo dated 8/5/07 from Chad Salli. 07/31/2008 csaiii Action: AP revised sheets C17, C20 dated 7/18/08 and C18A, C19 dated 7/1/08 approved Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTV-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE Y TELEPHONE AT 7. 49 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. i~ SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit # B06-0196 as of 12-08-2008 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT, LLC-THOMAS J. BRINK 612-332-1500 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Conditions: Cond: CON0008815 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3/28/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 Applied: 07/18/2006 Issued: 12/08/2008 To Expire: 09/26/2007 The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the full building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original comment number for clarity. General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule" to prevent a room that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor". The Fire and Life Safety Report prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants. These will be required for full permit issuance. General: The Fire & Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved prior to the approval for full building permit. 3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units 3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is discharging. 8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C-414, is actually a horizontal portion of Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or remove the designation of passageway. 10) See the general comment above. 11) See the general comment above. 12) See the general comment above. 13) See the general comment above. 16) See the general comment above. 22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be tested in accordance with ASTME 119, tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire-resistance rating not less than the fire-resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the window when responding for full building permit. 23) See the general comment above. 39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures. Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly. This item has no impact on the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building permit issuance. 42) See response the comment number 39. 46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space is not accessory. 46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 210A as there is no access to stair Q. Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel. 49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved by the Town of Vail's Building Official. 57 through 61 and 149) The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 14 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 17 (BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FRAMING INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED FOR. Cond: 35 (P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: 5 (PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPRINT SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC. Cond: CON0009095 The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review aplication for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs added from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive, within 30 days of the release of the building permit. Cond: CON0009121 The applicant shall submit a seperate Design Review application for review and approval for all signage design, locations, and materials prior to installation. Cond: CON0009294 The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan which addresses the landscaping conflicts created by the shallow soild depths on the culvert containing Spraddle Creek. This plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to requesting a certifcate of occupancy. Cond: CON0009330 SAFEbuilt Colorado Conditions of Approval To: Layton Construction Re: Full Building Permit Conditions of Approval The following conditions will be required to be addressed prior to construction. Sufficient time shall be granted for review, response and approval before work is initiated. Building Department- The items listed within the building department comments are numbered to correspond with the 3 round comment letter dated 08/21/2007. 46. Change the exiting from Vestibule 210A. It appears to exit through intervening room that is not accessory to the vestibule. HGA Response: We submit that the adjacent space is accessory. Vestibule 210A services mechanical rooms and the service elevators. To exit from Vestibule 210A the occupants have to pass through Vestibule 275A, which is basically for the spa staff, then through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area, then to hallway 279, then through exit passageway 293, then through exit passageway 297, then to exit discharge. The issue is that the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area is not accessory to the mechanical rooms. It is accessory for the rooms off Vestibule 275A for the staff of the spa but not the mechanical areas. Please change the layout accordingly. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Vestibule 210A is purely circulation space and does not carry an occupant load. This vestibule provides connection between the Spa and the service elevators, IDF Room 210, and Mechanical Room 257. Relative to egress, it provides the egress route for the one occupant from IDF 210 and the one occupant from Mechanical 257 (as shown on A0.3.02). IDF 210, Mechanical 257, Vestibule 210A, and Service Elevator Lobby E-202 are considered to be part of the overall Spa as they serve Spa functions. The service elevators stop at this location solely to provide connection to the Spa. IDF 210 houses audio-visual, telephone, and data system equipment that specifically serves the Spa and must be accessed by Spa personnel. Similarly, Mechanical 257 houses the equipment serving the pools within Room 255 and must be accessed by Spa staff. In summary, we submit that all these spaces are part of the overall Spa and are "accessory" to each other. Therefore, current layout provides egress that complies with IBC 1013.2 as the spaces are accessory, are not hazard occupancies, and provide a discernible path of travel to an exit. This comment is in reference to the electrical room #212. Please revise 64. A2.03.1 - Wall tag both shafts located in room 304 (storage room). Wall tags must reference an approved assembly from the partition schedule. HGA Response: Wall tag has been added. One shaft in room 304 does not have wall tags. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The drawing has been updated to include wall tags for this shaft. Still have one shaft not tagged Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. 152. Provide accessible parking spaces per IBC Table 1106.1. Providing 212 spaces would require 7 to be accessible, 2 of those to be van accessible. Verify 98" of vertical clearance for the van spots. HGA Response: We submit that the number of accessible parking stalls complies with IBC Table 1106.1 and section 1106.5. The hotel is operating on 100% valet parking stalls, with an additional 59 self-park stalls for fractional ownership, full ownership, and employee. Per Table 1106.1, 3 stalls are required for the self-parking, and at least one of the three is required to be van accessible. Plan sheet A0.3.01 indicates there are 228 parking spaces. Spaces marked for Valet parking number 78. With those counts, Table 1106.1.3 would require 5 accessible spaces with one van accessible space. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Per previous response, most of the parking spaces are valet only. There are 59 self-park stalls that will be allocated to fractional ownership, full ownership condos, and employees. The drawings have been updated to identify each space as either valet or self-park. We submit that only the 59 self-park stalls are considered per Table 1106.1 and that the number of accessible spaces required are provided. Deducting the 78 Valet parking from the total spaces, you are still required to add two additional accessible spaces for a total number of 5 accessible spaces. 155. All the massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. Please amend the toilet facilities, changing rooms, lavatories, tubs and the showers meet to accessibility requirements of the ANSI A117.1-98. (IBC 1109.14.3) HGA Response: We submit the Wet Massage Suite #289 complies with the accessibility requirements of ANSI Al 17.1-98 (IBC 1109.14.3). All massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We disagree that IBC 11 09.14.3 requires that ALL spa treatment rooms be accessible. IBC 1109.14 pertains to "recreational facilities". If the Spa is going to be considered a "recreational facility" then it should be considered as a whole. As such, the Spa is accessible - it provides accessibility at the entry/reception, locker rooms, toilets, showers, whirlpools, lounges, treatment rooms, etc. We submit that nothing requires ALL treatment rooms to be accessible any more than ALL lockers, ALL toilets, or ALL showers. Add grab bars at the tub in room 289 for accessibility. 167. We are unable to locate a designated accessible Type "A" condominium per Section 1 107.6.2 of the 2003 IBC. As the condominiums are a different type of R-2 occupancy from the time-share units, an accessible Type "A" condominium is required. HGA Response: Since only 16 condominiums are proposed, no Type "A" units are required. Refer to IBC 1107.6.2.1.1. With the condominiums, employee housing and timeshare units there are a total of 63 units classified as an R-2 occupancy group. Per Section 1107.6.2.1.1 Type A units shall be dispersed among the various classes of units. Therefore a Type A accessible unit is required in each of the following groups: the condominiums, the employee housing, and the timeshare units. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): To resolve this issue we have revised Condo 48 (on Level 9, sheet A4.28.1)) to be a "Type A" unit per ICC/ANSI Al 17. 1. Two accessible employee housing units and one accessible timeshare unit are already provided and indicated on the drawings. Comment 169-180 - Submit a Memorandum of Understanding to the Town of Vail for approval by the Building Official to reference the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-1 17.1. If accepted by the town, please revise entire plan to comply with the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1 in its entirety. If not accepted please revise plans per 1998 ANSI A-117.1 and comments above. 169. In the accessible units in the guest rooms of the R-I occupancy, all bathing & toilet facilities are required to be accessible per Chapter 6 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: We submit that the accessible units include the accessible bathing and toilet facilities and comply with Chapter 6 of ANSI A 117.1. Plan sheet A4.07.1 A and A4.07.1 B for Unit PR-HC shows a raised platform in media room # 116 which does not have an accessible route. Also, bathrooms/rooms # 103, # 108, # 109, # 1 10, # 133 do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The raised platform within Media 116 is intended to provide tiered seating within this "home theater". We submit that an accessible route is not required for this small platform as it is less than 25% of the overall room and the remainder of the room is accessible. While this room is not an "assembly" space, we submit that IBC 1108.2.4. 1, exception 2 provides guidance regarding this room. See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.06.1 for Unit 2KK-HC has bathrooms/rooms #103, #108 which do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.05.3 for Unit 1 K-HC has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.04AA for Unit ES2-HC has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.01.1 for Unit K 1-H 1 has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Unit type K1-HI is a unit for the hearing impaired. It is not an accessible unit. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We submit that only one accessible bathroom is required within an accessible hotel unit. This requirement is consistent with the federal standard - ADAAG Chapter 9. To interpret IBC Chapter 11 as requiring that ALL bathrooms must be accessible is to raise the standard beyond the federal requirements. We submit that this is not reasonable, does not reflect industry standard, and is not the intent of the IBC / ICC. Rather, we submit that the IBC / ICC intends to coordinate and correlate with the federal standards. As an example, we can examine the accessibility requirements for condominiums. The federal standard is the FHA Fair Housing Design Manual. This document allows condo units to be provided with one "Specification B" bathroom and that is the highest level of accessibility. Similarly, the 2003 edition of ICC / ANSI A117.1 has been revised to better correlate to FHA and require that "Type A" units provide "at least one" accessible bathroom . The common thread is the requirement is for one or "at least one" accessible bathroom - not all. Since the ADAAG, FHA Design Manual, and A117 (2003) all require one or "at least one" accessible bathroom it is reasonable to interpret the IBC's requirements in the same manner. Otherwise, all the hotel units would be held to a higher standard than the condominium units within the same building. 170. In Type "A" dwelling units of the R-2 occupancies, all toilet and bathing facilities must comply with Sections 1002.11.1 through 1002.11.7 of ANSI A 117.1. Some Type "A" dwelling units have bathrooms which do not comply. Please clarify. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We request that ICC/ANSI A117.1 - 2003 be used as the applicable edition relative to the "Type A" condominium. This is the most recent version of A 117 and our research has found that the various revisions in Chapter 10 were intended to correct the intent of various provisions and to better coordinate with federal requirements (FHA and ADA). Per 1003.11.1 of the Al 17-2003, at least one bathroom is required to comply with 1003.11. This correlates with FHA requirements ("Specification B" bathrooms) and Chapter 9 of the ADA. Therefore, we submit that the latest intent of the various codes and standards is that at least one bathroom, but not all, is required to comply with 1003.11. 171. In Type "A" dwelling units, a permanent seat is required at the head end of the bathtub per Section 607 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): ICC/ANSI A117.1 - 1998, 607.3 states that a permanent seat OR a removable in-tub seat shall be provided. However, 1002.11.6, exception 1, states that the removable in-tub seat required by 607.3 is NOT required. Since 607.3 gives the option of either permanent or removable seats, we submit that the true intent of 1002.11.6, exception l is to NOT require either type of seat. ICC / ANSI A 117.1 - 2003 carries similar language, but also includes Figure 1003.11.8 (a) to clarify that the seat (permanent or removable) can be omitted. 172. In Type "A" dwelling units, clearance in front of bathtubs shall extend the length of the bathtub and shall be 30 inches wide minimum per Section 607 of ANSI A 117.1. Some of the bathtubs have lavatories encroaching into the required clearances. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required bathtub clear floor area is indicated. 173. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.11.1 of ANSI Al 17.1, doors shall not swing into the clear floor or ground space or clearance for any fixture, unless a clear floor space of 30 inches minimum by 48 inches minimum is located beyond the arc of the door swing. There are water closet compartments and some other bathroom areas that do not meet those requirements. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. The door swings do not swing into the other clear floor spaces. 174. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.13 of ANSI A117.1, where operable windows are provided, at least one window in each sleeping, living, or dining space shall have operable parts complying with Section 1002.13 of ANSI A 117.1. All windows of "accessible units" shall comply with Section 309 of ANSI A117.1, Operable Parts. Provide documentation showing compliance. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. A note has been added to indicate requirement that all operable windows (and sliding doors) comply with 1002.13. 175. For Type "A" and "accessible units", provide details showing accessibility compliance for the operable parts of the showers, lavatory height, lavatory knee and toe clearance, and bathroom mirror height per Section 1002.11 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to interior elevations shown within the Interior Design drawings. I am unable to locate the Interior Design Drawings in the plan set submitted. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to accessibility details illustrated on sheet A0.4.3. 180. For Type "A" dwelling units, provide details showing accessibility compliance for kitchen work surfaces, sinks, range controls, and refrigerator/freezer requirements per Section 1002.12 of ANSI Al 17. 1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required kitchen features are illustrated. 183. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the condominiums, some "U" shaped kitchens do not have the required 60 inch minimum clearance between opposing base cabinets per Section 1003.12 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Sheets A4.22.1, A4.25.1, and A4.30.1 have been revised to provide 60" clearance at U-shaped kitchens. Provide corrected plan sheets. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These sheets are included in the 7/18/07 resubmittal set. 185. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the time share units, the water closets do not have required clearances and some doors encroach required clearances per Section 1003.11.2 of ANSI A117. 1. HGA Response: Refer to the response to comment # 186 below. As such, there are no Type "B" timeshare units. See response to comment # 186. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to response to comment # 186. 186. Is Option "A" being used for the bathroom fixtures in the Type "B", Time-share units? If so, each fixture is required to meet the requirements of the option per Section 1003.11.3.1 of ANSI A 117.1. Please clarify. HGA Response: As previously discussed and resolved, the timeshare units are transient occupancy (similar to hotel units) and not residences. As such, one accessible timeshare unit is provided per IBC Table 1107.6.1.1. This accessible unit is #3103 located on Level 03. The enlarged plan for this accessible unit is on sheet A4.12.1 A and the associated H/C bathroom in 2/A4.12.2A. Provide signed letters from persons representing the operating authority for this facility stating that the timeshare units will not be used as residences. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These letters will be submitted by ownership 203. Enclose both mechanical rooms on the 9th level in 2 hour rated construction, it appears that the 2 hour shafts from below terminate in these rooms. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet M4.06 (Part Plan Attachment No. M06). The Area 3A mechanical room is unrated, and the 2 hour rated vertical risers through the building through the 8th floor slab. In order to avoid the installation of inaccessible fire dampers at the top of the riser, RYBKA have revised sheet M4.06 to ductwork is to be fire rated in the attic space. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. The Area 3B mechanical room is a 2 hour rated room that ends at column line A14. The ductwork that extends to the south across column line A 14 is 2 hour fire rated to avoid the installation of fire dampers in inaccessible locations. Fire dampers are shown in the penetrations of the two hour rated Area 3B mechanical room, where ductwork exist the mechanical room. A) The mechanical room on the 9th level over "AREA-03A"has not been addressed on the plan sheets. The partial ninth floor plan on 8'/2" x 1 1" indicate wrapping ducts. If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. Ductwork is to be wrapped to provide 2 hour fire rating in attic space. (Refer to Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03). Provide architectural details rated enclosure. B) In the mechanical room labeled 911 the rated walls do not appear to enclose the room entirely. The wall is labeled 30 minutes on the north end and the wall is labeled 1 hour where Trash 912 (above "AREA-0313") is located on sheet A0.3.09. There are 3 duct penetrations in this area to be addressed, 28x10 S/E F/B, 24x18 G/e F/B and 24x14 S/A F/A T/B. Rybka Response: Refer to Architectural Sheet A0.3.09 where Mechanical Room 911 is to be provided with 2 hour rating. Three ducts identified enter riser shaft from Mechanical Room 911 and riser is considered to be connected to and form part of mechanical room and so no fire smoke damper is provided. The ducts in question enter a shaft in the floor below within Maid Room G-711. Fire/Smoke Dampers are required where these ducts enter the shaft. One duct is not in a shaft. Please address accordingly. C) How will the 2 hour shaft assembly be maintained at EF-14 and EF-30? If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be rated for operation within rated enclosures by fan manufacturer or are to be relocated within Mechanical Room 911. Provide architectural details for the shafts. 214. Add a fire/smoke damper to the penetration by the 8x6 duct that penetrates the 30 minute fire partition on page M2.08.1 on grid line 11 and between A9 and A 10. Rybka Response: Fire dampers are not required in one hour rated fire barriers per IMC 607.5.2. (Refer to Response No. 208.) This is not a fire barrier; it is a fire partition defining a rated corridor. A fire/smoke damper is required for this duct. Rybka Response: Combination fire smoke damper is provided where this duct exits the rated shaft. The response indicates an Us damper has been added to the duct as exits the rated shaft. A smoke damper is required where it penetrates the rated corridor. 215. Fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Rybka Response: Mechanical floor plan sheets, sheets M2.01.1 thru M2.1 1.1 have been revised to show: " Combination fire smoke dampers (FSD) or shunt duct* on rated shaft penetrations. FD in duct floor penetrations when no more than three floors are penetrated, and " FD on 2 hour rated wall penetrations. * shunt ducts per NFPA 90A (2002), Figure A.5.3. NFPA 90A is not an adopted document by the Town of Vail or referenced in the IMC. The review team is not familiar with the term "shunt duct". Fire smoke dampers are required at the shaft and corridor duct penetrations. (IMC 607.5.3, 607.5.4 and 607.5.5.1) Rybka Response: The 2006 IMC now calls the use of 22" upturned sheet metal ducts in 2 hour fire rated risers as 'sub ducts'. The provision ofthe'sub duct' is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. The use of sub ducts on the project is shown in Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03. M2.03.1 - Remove designations for shunt ducts for the ducts run in the garage exhaust shaft. Rybka Response: EF-8, EF-43 and residential dryer exhaust have been shown terminating in a vertical areaway (garage exhaust riser) that is always being exhausted by EF-1B on emergency power. It was agreed during the June TOV plan review meeting that this condition is analogous to the 'sub duct' provisions identified earlier. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 2. In Group B and R occupancies equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 of the International Building Code, smoke dampers are not required at penetrations of shafts where kitchen, clothes, dryer, bathroom and toilet room exhaust openings with steel exhaust subducts, having a wall thickness of at least 0.019 inch (0.48 mm) extend at least 22 inches (559 mm) vertically and the exhaust fan at the upper terminus is powered continuously in accordance with the provisions of Section 909.11 of the International Building Code, and maintains airflow upward to the outdoors. The drawings are still substantially incomplete when labeling FSD's. I will attempt to identify some locations. It will be up to the design team to identify all locations. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts exit rated shafts. All drawings are indicting F.D. on the bathroom exhausts where penetrating the shaft. There is an administrative modification request to eliminate dampers on the bathroom exhausts. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FD designations at restroom exhausts have been deleted where 'sub-ducts' are provided per the administrative modification. The drawings are indicating ducts from below and ducts from above. Please create a tag for sub-ducts and clearly mark the plans on all the ducts that are to be utilizing this system. M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-301 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 2-8x6 ducts and 1-10x6 duct. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-311 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 1-8x10 duct and 1-1 2x6. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-301 and C-311 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - All duct penetrations through the shafts are marked F.D. These are required to be FSD. There are too many to list individually. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts penetrate rated shafts. There are multiple places that indicate FSD's where an administrative modification has been requested to utilize a 22" sub-duct. Please coordinate. M2.04.1 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-401 and C-411 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.04.1 - There is a 14x10 duct supplying corridor C-411 missing a damper designation. The duct is near A9.9 and 11/11.4. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. This duct has changed size to 12x8 since last review. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) These are just a few of the un-complying damper designations, stopped review on this correction. Again, fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Reconfiguration is still necessary. 216. Ductwork, pipes and electrical are prohibited in an exit passageways unless serving the exit passageway. It appears that above non-rated ceilings in the exit passageways the space is being used as a plenum and contains construction elements not allowed, please address all exit passageways. Rybka Response: Mechanical services not associated with exit passageways have been relocated. The review team's interpretation of IBC 1020.5 is that any ductwork serving an exit passageway shall be a completely separate system from the rest of the building and separate from all other passageways. Also, this system is required for pressurization. 1020.5 Penetrations. Penetrations into and openings through an exit passageway are prohibited except for required exit doors, equipment and ductwork necessary for independent pressurization, sprinkler piping, standpipes, electrical raceway for fire department communication and electrical raceway serving the exit passageway and terminating at a steel box not exceeding 16 square inches (0.010 m2). Such penetrations shall be protected in accordance with Section 712. There shall be no penetrations or communicating openings, whether protected or not, between adjacent exit passageways. Rybka Response: It is our understanding that only portions of the building service systems that serve the exit enclosure are allowed to penetrate the exit enclosure. We note that IBC 1019.1.3, VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURE, VENTILATION, Item .2 permits HVAC equipment (FCUs) to be located in the exit enclosure: 10 19.1.3 Ventilation. Equipment and ductwork for exit enclosure ventilation shall ....where located within the building, be separated from the remainder of the building, including other mechanical equipment, with construction as required for shafts. All ductwork serving the exit passageways shall be protected at the point of penetration of the passageway with a fire/smoke damper. The passageway is an extension of the vertical exit enclosure that it serves and lesser protection is not allowed. (1017.1) Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, and have provided FSD where make-up air ductwork penetrates the exit enclosure. M2.03.1- There is a duct termination shown in Stair Q exit enclosure, labeled "16x12 Employee Dryer T/A". This is not allowed in an exit enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been revised to show routing of dryer exhaust so that it does not pass through Stair Q. M2.04.1 - There is an 8x6 duct penetration within the exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.04.1 - There is a transfer opening 24x4 within exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization; this transfer opening is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.05.3 - There is a 6" duct shown penetrating Stair N exit enclosure. Please move out of the enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.05.3 has been revised and ductwork has been rerouted so as not to pass through Stair N. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-601 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the elevator lobby and maid's room. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-601. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 3.3/4 and A 11. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - There is a duct penetration between Exit Passageway C-601 and Stair S-601. Penetrations are not allowed. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-611 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-611 is not deliberate and is to be deleted. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 and a 12x6 duct passing through Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. Grid lines 11/11.4 and A8.2/A9.9. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There is a 20x10 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-611. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 133/134.3 and BC/BD. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.2 - There is a 12x10 duct penetrating the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that Stair S-605 is connected to exit passageway C-614. and that the 'unlabeled passageway' is rated 2 hours, this upper level of the hallway is rated to provide separation between levels 4 and 5 and this portion of the ceiling space does connect to a rated vertical exit enclosure, the hallway is not an exit passageway, and that 1020.5 does not apply. M2.06.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: See previous comment. M2.07.2 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-717 are not intended to function as returns, are to be shown 'blanked-off and are provided for aesthetic reasons only. M2.07.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.3 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.08.1 and M2.08.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-803. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. Penetrations are not allowed fire wrapped or not. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. These comments are still outstanding. Tim Willings P.E. with Rybka met with the plans examiner on 8/14/07 to bring updated drawings addressing these corrections. It was advised to submit the drawings when all other comments are addressed. 222. Please address the garage exhaust on the east side of the structure that will cause a nuisance thru the casement windows (W 102) in rooms 5318, 6318 and 7318. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet A2.05.2 for plan location, and sheet A0.7.2 (W 102) for window type. Architect to revise window to be fixed type. HGA Response: The architectural documents have been revised to provide fixed windows at these three locations. The architectural drawings are indicating windows W 102. This window is casement not fixed on sheet A0.7.2. Please coordinate. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Revised drawings indicating fixed windows at these locations are included with this resubmittal. Since this review, the Town of Vail has informed our review team that garage exhausts on the CO2 detectors are product-conveying outlets requiring being 10' above grade, 10' from openings into the building and 10' from property lines. The continuous fan is considered environmental, thus allowing 3' from openings and 3' from property lines. Please address accordingly. 224. Please indicate how the 18" flue from the gas ironer, on the 3rd level is routed thru the loading dock above on the 4th level. Rybka Response: Laundry gas-fired flat ironer vent leaves the laundry room at level 3 (Sheet M2.03.1) and runs vertically through the building in a rated chase with fire enclosed offsets before being vented at the roof of level 11 (Sheet M2.11.1). M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Provide architectural details for the shaft. 228. Specify on the plans the location of EC-l, Type I fan for the kitchen. Rybka Response: Sheet M4.04 has been revised to show Ecology Unit EC-1 in Ecology Room M-402A. Ecology Room M-402A as designed is a component of the grease duct enclosure. "The duct enclosure shall serve a single grease exhaust duct system and shall not contain any other ducts, piping, wiring or systems." Remove the other exhaust fans, ducting and electrical within the room not associated with the'Type 1 duct. (IMC 506.3. 10) Rybka Response: The 2 hour rated architectural enclosure of the Ecology unit has been reconfigured to that only the ductwork and equipment associated with the commercial kitchen exhaust is contained within the Ecology Room M-402A. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour wall and 90 minute door that is shown on the mechanical drawings. 233. Indicate on the plans that the 36" dryer duct and the 18" flue from the Ironer are in a 2 hour shaft on the 6th level, page M2.06.1. Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, the 36" dryer exhaust duct and 18" gas-fired flat ironer vent that both run horizontally at level 6 (on sheet M2.06.1) are to be in a 2-hr fire rated enclosure. M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. (from comment 224) Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour shaft walls and details for construction. Please show compliance to IBC 707.11 for the bottom of the shaft housing the 34" dryer duct. 234. Provide manufacturers instructions to verify the dryers in rooms 312 and 31 OD are capable of exhausting the developed length shown on the plans. Rybka Response: Residential dryer exhaust system shown on Sheet M2.03.1 serving Employee Laundry Room 31 OD and Valet Room 317, with quantity five (4+1) dryer exhaust connections to dryer exhaust EF-43 has been rerouted. In addition to the lint filter integral to the appliance, and auxiliary lint trap and cleanout has been shown on the common dryer exhaust duct system before the duct leaves the Employee Laundry Room 31 OD. The entire length of the residential dryer exhaust duct is to be fire wrapped to maintain clearances to combustibles. Discharge of laundry dryer exhaust is routed to exterior via connection to rated garage exhaust riser. Penetration is protected by fire wrap and minimum 22" shunt duct extended into garage exhaust riser. In addition, RYBKA have specified a laundry exhaust booster fan EF-43 which is interlocked with dryer operation. Dryer exhaust ducts are required to terminate to the outside the building and shall be equipped with a back draft damper, also clothes dryer exhaust ducts shall not extend into or through ducts or plenums. Route the dryer ducts directly to the exterior with a back draft damper. (IMC 504.4) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by showing the backdraft damper. The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 238. The Laundry Layout, page LA 1.2, indicates a flue pipe for the dry cleaner in room #317. Add the flue and the 2 hour chase to the architectural sheets and to the mechanical sheets, clarify that it does not pass through a plenum. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.03.1 to show dry cleaning machine exhaust fan EF-8 and ducted connection to outdoors. M2.03.1 - The termination is shown with a 22" sub-duct within the garage exhaust duct. This is not to the exterior as required per IMC 502.7.3.6. The review team also is concerned that when the garage exhaust is not operating the fumes from the dry cleaning can migrate to the garage. Terminate the dry cleaning exhaust to the exterior. Rybka Response: The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 244. Add a 2 hour shaft below and proper opening protection for the duct designated as 24x14 S/A F/A-24x12 S/A T/B on page M2.08.1 on grid line l0A and between 10.5111. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1 and relocated the duct riser to the protected shaft in the North West corner of the Maids Room G-811. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by properly coordinating the duct offset/riser transfer shown at this level with rated shaft location or rating requirements. These two ducts that transition between shafts that are not aligned between the 8th and 9th floor levels are both to be shown enclosed in a 2 hour rated drywall enclosure, negating the need for combination fire smoke dampers, except where duct connections penetrate the shaft wall (one location). The duct on this level is indicating 24x14 S/A(supply air) F/A(from above). The 9th floor level or the enlarged M4.06 does not show this duct. Please clarify. 245. Add a 2 hour shaft or designate a fire damper for the 28x10 and the 28x14 as it passes through a 2 hour floor/ceiling assembly into the mechanical room above. On page M2.08.1 between grid lines 10.5 /11 and A8.2/A9.9. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that ducts that rise vertically through the building that are protected with two hour fire rated enclosures and are connected to a 2 hour rated mechanical room at the highest level do not have a fire damper at the floor penetration of the mechanical room. Rybka submits that the 2 hour rated shaft enclosure is an extension of the 2 hour rating of the mechanical room fire rated enclosure. There is a 24x10 duct shown penetrating the shaft connecting to the 28x10 duct within the shaft. Add the S/F damper at this location. (The architectural overlays indicate a shaft too small to house the duct?) There is a 24x18 duct shown in this vicinity penetrating the floor/ceiling above. Please address with a fire damper. 246. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 8x10 duct on page M2.07.2 between grid lines A8.2/A9.9 and 10/10.5. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1. The duct has not been addressed on all levels also see comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by coordinating the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7, 8, 9 and 10 and attic levels (Sheets M2.07.2, M2.08.2, M2.09.2, M2.10.2 and M2.11.1). Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft wall (one location each occupied floor). The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands, the duct in question has been changed to 12x18 on the 7th level. 247. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 12x6 duct on page M2.07.1 between grid lines A6/A7 and on grid line 4.2. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1, M2.08.1, M209.1. This duct serving the elevator lobbies has not been addressed. Rybka Response: Rybka will coordinate the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7 in this location with level above and below. Rybka will correct this by rerouting existing ductwork through rated risers provided by HGA in these locations and Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft . The same issue as response to #246. The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands. The supply duct from level 11 to 10 has no shaft, the duct runs horizontally on the 9th level with no shaft and runs to the 7th level with fire dampers at the floors of the 8th and 9th. This duct requires a shaft. 264. Fire dampers and rated shafts for ductwork through floor/ceiling assemblies are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Refer to response to comment 215 Here are some floor penetrations by ducts that have not been addressed, please evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. M2.03.1 - 12x20 duct, grid lines A4.6 and 2.7/3 The duct in question has changed to 20x16. The vertical and horizontal shafts need to be shown on the architectural sheets. M2.03.1 - 18x14 duct, grid lines A12 and 3.3/4 The horizontal shaft shown on M2.02.1 is not shown on the architectural sheets. M2.04.1 - 16x10 duct, grid lines A13 and 3.3/4 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.04 - 12x6 duct, grid lines A10/AI I and 10.5/11 A fire damper has been added to the 2 floors above. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. M2.04 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10/AI I and 10.5111 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. The duct is connecting more than 2 stories below the shaft. M2.04 - 6x 12 duct, grid lines A 10 and 10.5 The drawings have been changed to add fire dampers at the floor line. This duct connects more than 2 stories, a shaft is required. M2.05 - 26x14 R/A, grid lines A6/A7 and 5 A fire damper is required at the floor between the 5th and 6th level. M2.05 - 12x12 paint shop exhaust, 12x12 carpenter exhaust and a 24x12 sanitary duct, grid lines A4.6 and 4/5. These ducts traverse from what appears to be a rated shaft from below through the Resid. Club Concierge Desk (512) room up through the ceiling with no protection. This duct enters a shaft on this level, add a fire damper to the duct as it enters the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.05 - 6x6, 8x6, (2)12x6 and 10x20 ducts, grid lines A10 and 10/10.5 M2.05 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10 and 10.5/11 Review on duct penetrations through the floors has been stopped. The plans examiner's function is not to make a punch list for the design team. Evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that fire dampers, rated shafts and combination fire smoke dampers have been added to the floor plans in general conformance with requirements of the plan reviewer. Additional damper, combination fir dampers and shaft wall construction will be required where this drawing revision has not correctly identified that they are required. Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. Structural Conditions- The conditions listed are taken from the last comment letter dated 07/18/2007. The open issues are listed in Red. S106 F 9,11,14/S6.01 E Sheet S2.03.2: 12 ft. cantilever retaining wall extension of exterior two span wall below, outside of ballroom areaway on line A 1 I between 14 and 14.5 has not been checked and appears to be overstressed for flexure, please check. Consider moment resisting joints at slab to wall connections. Design / detail planter wall. These details require rebar and splices to be shown for proper detailing and construction. Verify cantilever deflection. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. silo F S2.02.4 No calculations have been provided for the cantilevered retaining wall around the pool structure, or on gridline D1. Verify lateral load capacity, consider pedestrian surcharge and water surcharge due to site drains behind this wall as appropriate. Verify footing width. KL&A 6/26/07: Wall in question between gridlines 6-8.5 south of A] 8 supports roof loads and also is the lateral load path for pool structure loading, and for roof uplift for partially enclosed structures. Wall also is monolithic with Area 3A perimeter building wall. Design is part of EOR's scope, please provide wall designs accounting for support of roof structure. KL&A 8/31/07: Coordinate new retaining wall detail 21/S4.03 with foundations shown on plan, S2.02.4. Verify new steel roof around pool structure will resist lateral soil reaction of 1.0 klf, verify metal deck shear strength and connection to resisting perpendicular retaining walls. S128 GS S2.09.3 Top slab bars 1 OT3 & 1 OT6 are shown at line 10.6/A 14. It seems these bars are shown in error as the concrete beam is upturned at this location. Beams south of line A 12.2 are not identified. Please check. IBC 1603.1. KL&A 6/26/07: Top bars also appear required at gridline A10. S2.09.3 PT profile is incomplete, details are required. KL&A 8/31/07: Top bars are still not shown on plan, please review. S145 LS 1/S3.02C Wall thickness is shown as 8 inches. Plan S201.2 indicates a 12" exterior foundation wall, please coordinate. KL&A 6/26/07: Coordinate reinforcing shown on shear wall elevation with 'W2'or'W3' per S2.01.2, it is unclear which wall type controls for soil lateral loading. Wall must span two way due to stair shaft opening, verify designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S164 LS S2.11 Provide detail of roof diaphragm to concrete cores. Provide or indicate detail of steel beams to concrete cores for gravity plus lateral loading, per ASCE 7-02 load combinations. Verify drag loads and chord force detailing at eave framing. Verify diaphragm welding is sufficient for expected shear forces, provide shear and moment diagram at roof deck levels. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7. KL&A 6/26/07: New detail 13/S1.0.5B:Welded studs, thickness and dimensions of embed plate are not defined. Please provide this information for all beams and reaction conditions on the drawings. Verify connection is adequate with short slot or long slot holes in the shear tab, if permitted for erection. Provide roof diaphragm calculations per original comment. IBC 1911, 1912, 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S165 LS S2.11 Provide detail of concrete diaphragm to concrete cores, verify shear transfer at each level and comment whether any drags are required. Verify if typical details 12 & 23/S1.0.3A apply throughout the job. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S169 LS S3.02A Calculations show a significant force reversal / back-stay effect from Level 6 to Level 5 shear force, i.e. SW 14 & SW 16. Verify this load path has been designed for the loads per 31) analysis. Verify soil plus wind / seismic loading has been used for drag design. Note per plan, S2.05.1, a large hole exists adjacent to wall SW 16, and per calculations page 536, (38+57)=95k shear transfer is required. No drags are shown on plan. Please verify. Note, elevations 53.02A show #5 @ 14" o.c. at upper levels, calculations shown (2) #5 @ 24" o.c., please verify designs match calculations. IBC 1616.1.1, IBC 1604.4. KL&A 6/26/07: Original comment calculated (38+57)=95k load for SW14 not SW16 as noted, however collector bars have not been added for SW14. SW16 collector load is (86+143)=229k, (4) #7 shown on plan are not adequate for 229k, please review all collector designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S171 S2.11.1-2, etc. Roof framing plans are incomplete. Please address the following and confirm detailing will be provided in future drawings issues, per IBC 1604.2, 2205.1. a) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed b) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed c) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed d) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed e) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed f) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed g) W8 & W16 eave supports do not cantilever outwards and support eave in RAM analysis submitted, instead all load is transferred directly to columns via eave rim beam. Verify eave supports and perimeter girders are adequately sized KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. h) S2.09.3, etc: HSS6x6 to W8, W14 moment connection at eave needs a detail KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. i) 1 /S2.10.3: W 1601 on line A 10.5 is shown as WI 805 per calculations, please verify all beams match calculations. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S172 1/S2.08.3 W18x46 eave support girder near gridlines CB-Cl is shown as W21x44 per calculations; W14x30 on line BE is shown as W21x48 per calculations. Several cantilevered eave moment connection supports are shown without a backspan member. Please review. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 I /S2.08.3 Verify lateral support of the low roof structure for wind and seismic loading; low roof section is not connected to Level 8 PT slab beyond or core walls within the roof area, and braced frames are not shown. Similar at 2/S2.08.3 and other low roof structures. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 11,26,28/S7.OIA Calculations indicate that roof deck is attached to slab edge along line 2 and other locations where deck and floor slab are near the same elevation. Provide a detail for lateral roof to slab connection where required by lateral analysis. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S174 S2.11.1, etc Show roof diaphragm to concrete core connection, consider in-plane collector shear forces and out of plane anchorage forces. IBC 1604.8.2; ASCE 7, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S175 S2.11.1 Verify diaphragm continuity at dormers line A5 between upper roof deck and lower roof deck, provide collectors as required for in plane shear and out of plane shear. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S176 S2.09.2 Roof ridge support columns near] 5.5-A4.8 shown on S2.11.2 are not supported by slab below, please check. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Column in question is 20 feet tall, verify HSS5x5 is adequate, per S2.11.2. S178 A2.11.1 R, etc. Structural roof plans do not incorporate snow fences shown on architectural drawings. Please provide snow fence with adequate structural connection shear and moment associated with sliding 'snow. IBC 1608. KL&A 8/31 /07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. KL&A 8/31/07: COMMENTS ON NEW DETAILS FOLLOW S187 21/S4.03 Minimum depth shall be 48" for frost depth requirement. IBC 1805.2.1. Verify wall vertical rebar is adequately developed at top of footing, ACI 318, 12.2. Appears that variables D and D' are reversed with calculations variables hf and hp, please review. IBC 1806. 5188 S5.03 Revised beams 4138 & 4139 appear too shallow to support one way slab at ramp. Shear ties are spaced greater than d/2. Please review beam sizes for ramp loads. IBC 1604.2. Planning Department Conditions- From: Warren Cambell Submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval prior to requesting a TCO. Public Works Conditions- From: Chad Salli, Project Engineer 1. Install snowmelt in loading dock dwy. Sheet M5.15 not in resubmittal package, Sheet M5.14 shows heat in the southern half of the dwy. The dwy should be heated from the back of pan along the Frontage Rd to the trench drain. 2. The fountain entry feature shall not be public right-of-way, please remove from right-of-way. 3. The two tier retaining wall shall be designed/stamped by a Colorado registered professional engineer, greater than 4' in height from the top of wall to the bottom of the foundation. 4. Provide Final Drainage report including hydrology and hydraulic analyses (Box culvert, Storm pipe, inlets, swales, etc...). This shall include storm sewer profiles with HGL shown. A 100 yr analysis shall be completed showing no private/public property damage as a result. Provide capacity analysis for major swales and all inlets. The SCS method may be used for large mountain basins, the Rational method shall be used for the smaller site and developed basins. 5. A Developer Improvement Agreement will be required prior to release of permit. 6. Show proposed location for Comcast fiber line along the west property line. Frontage Road/Vail Road 1. Town of Vail Street lights shall be placed at 50' spacings along the project limits. Coordinate with TOV electricians for electric meter location. Relocate private lighting to private property. 2. Set back (detach) the frontage rd sidewalk 6' from back of curb east of the porte cochere exit. Sod shall be installed between the curb and walk. 3. Use attached sidewalk detail for sidewalks located within the right-of-way. 4. Use TY 13 curb inlets vs TY R where the sidewalk is attached to the curb. 5. If necessary, raise Spraddle Creek vault #1 manhole to finished grade. 6. The cross-walk at the roundabout shall be asphalt thru the travel lanes and concrete only across the median. 7. Use CDOT TY 3A curb ramps at the roundabout, 6' width at the throat. 8. Storm line A shall be at I% minimum slope. Leaving the existing proposed invert elev at TY R inlet 3 and working upstream at I% appears to still allow for a min of 2' cover at the existing inlet on the north side of the frontage road. 9. Sheet E1.00, please turn off extra curb&gutter alignment. 10. Install 24" conduits to medians for irrigation and 3-4" conduits to the west median for future use. Spraddle Creek Drainage I . Per previous agreement with the Town, Four-Seasons is responsible for the construction cost of continuing Spraddle Creek to STA 4+40. 2. Install an impermeable membrane around the RCP/CBC due to proposed landscaping and irrigation. 3. Please provide additional detail of proposed walls along the RCP/CBC alignment. Construction of these walls shall be designed so as not to disturb/undermine the RCP/CBC. W Meadow Drive 1. Final approval of the West Meadow Drive construction drawings will be completed in conjunction with the Town of Vail design. Modifications to tie-in grades on the Four Seasons site may be necessary to accommodate this final design. W Meadow plans shall also develop streetscape related items in the right-of-way (street lighting, landscaping, etc). 2. Storm line G alignment needs to be revised. There is not enough room to install between Spraddle Creek and a large tree on the south side of W Meadow that shall be protected. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. 3. Storm line E appears to in conflict with the recently installed water line. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. Landscaping/Irrigation Detailed landscaping comments to follow within the next couple of weeks. Coordinate irrigation with TOV irrigation supervisor for final head type/location and water source. 3. The Town is currently in talks with CDOT on permissible landscaping within CDOT right-of-way. Fire Department Conditions- 1. LSR, MOU's and Administrative Modifications must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protection Engineer of record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not accepted. RJA allegedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence has not been presented. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans is not accepted. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additional review. Cond: CON0010349 Sub-duct system for the dryers and range hoods is not approved. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R080002323 Amount: $110.00 12/08/200801:21 PM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: DDG Notation: credit card - Mark Reed Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 161,377.90 This Payment: $110.00 Total ALL Pmts: 161,377.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 110.00 Transmittal Form Revision Submittals: 1. "Field Set" of approved plans MUST accompany revisions 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved & the permit is re-issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are $55.00 per hour (2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. ( ) Revisions Permit #(s) information applies to: Attention: ( ) Response to Correction Letter -attached copy of correction letter Fo...r Seasons V G: 1 ( ) Deferred Submittal ?R_~ 0 3^ a 4to $ Q O(o -O l q lp (vrOther Project Address: Description / List of Changes: 4- l V e.: 1 [.o o C~ i V o.: 1 o A ih e n +h n o h Q Y Z e... Contact Information Company: N V- -S r ct,: I► s Z C_ Company Ph: q-70 if -r(p 4q Fax: Contact Name: J o h kA t S Contact Ph: R't G ' ` "(f - 't $ ~1 g Cell: $ ~ 3. 4 l lQ - o b $ _T E-Mail: \ C"~' S CA I\ %LS Town of Vail Contractor Registration No: X 3 Sign ure (required) Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building $ Plumbing $ Electrical $ Mechanical $ Fire Sprinkler/Alarm $ Total $ q W., Ct V\ a ~ _ g `s (Use additional sheet if necessary) Date Received: IF 1q, V11 71- LI NOV 17 2008 TOWN OF VAIL HKS Transmittal Ship Via Hand Delivered Town of Vail Date 11/17/2008 nov Project Name Four Seasons Resorts - Vail Project No. 11247000 To Michael McGee Town of Vail Fire Department 42 W. Meadow Drive Vail CO 81657 Phone 970.479.2135 FAX 970.479.2176 Pages 5 Martin Haeberle Town of Vail Chief Building Official Director of Community Dev. 75 South Frontage Rd. Vail CO 81657 Phone 970.479.2142 FAX Subject Amendment to Fire & Life Safety Report, Exterior Combustible Siding & Materials. Four Seasons Resort Vail. Description PRJ 03-0468; B06-0196 Please find attached four (4) signed and sealed sets of the Amendment to Fire & Life Safety Report for Exterior Combustible Siding and Materials with Rendered Elevations. Three (3) for the Town of Vail and one (1) for the Fire Department. We respectfully request your review of this material to enable the Project to proceed with the installation of exterior finishes. Please let us know if you have any additional questions or requests that we may be able to assist you with. Please advise us at your earliest convenience of acceptance. If you have questions, please call me at 970-476-7849 or 813-416-0687. Thanks you, John H. Curtis, HKS Inc. HKS-Hill Glazier Studio Sent By John Curtis cc D. Brooks trans. only. 9 1 0 R C E 0 WE NOV 17 2008 D TOWN OF VAIL 71 'PJA ROLF JENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. FIRE PROTECTION CONSULTANTS t R EN 2` / 101 Convention Center Drive Suite 650 Las Vegas, NV 89109-2001 USA o(0,C)IJ j www.doinc.com 2 +1 702-699-5391 Fax: +1 702-6995534 AMENDMENT TO FIRE & LIFE SA of Four Seasons Hotel Vail, Colorado NOV 17 2008 TOWN OF VAIL Performance Design for Exterior Combustible Siding & Materials Revised, November 14, 2008 Introduction: The Four Seasons Resort in Vail, Colorado will be constructed as a Type IB building. As such, the International Building Code (IBC) 2003 edition defines this building as non-combustible. This requires the building to be constructed of materials that are non-combustible and the use of combustible materials in finish and exterior applications is restricted. The intent of these requirements is to reduce the potential for fires to spread in non-combustible construction. The Four Seasons Resort proposes to use wood t4m fascia and non-structural trusses on the exterior walls as part of the decorative materials. The design is being modified from the original March 2007 agreement in that all 2x combustible trim located at doors and windows is being replaced with fiber cement board material. Code Section: Section 603 of the 2003 IBC, establishes the requirements for use of combustible material in Type I and II construction. Chapter 14 also regulates the use of combustible materials on exterior walls. Code Requirement: Section 603 of the 2003 IBC allows the use of combustible materials within and on the exterior of the building in certain conditions. Where not installed over 15 feet from grade, the use of wood products of any dimension may be used as trim and similar applications. Section 1405.4 also allows the use of wood veneers on exterior walls when not less than 1-inch for hardwood and 3/8-inch for structural panels or particleboard. These veneers can be used on the exterior walls up to three stories from grade and up to four stories when fire retardant treated. The Code also allows the use of heavy timber for combustible projections, structural columns and arches regardless of height above grade in Section 602.4.7. © 2008 Rolf Jensen & Associates Inc., All Rights Reserved ■ ME SEEN 0 No EEEEENEENENN AMENDMENT TO FIRE & LIFE SAFETY REPORT V31063 - Page 2 FOUR SEASONS HOTEL March 13, 2007 EXTERIOR COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS Revised November 3, 2008 Code Intent: The intent of the Code to limit combustible materials within and on non-combustible buildings is to reduce the fuel loads associated with these combustible materials. The Code allows non-combustible buildings to be of larger size and greater area than combustible type construction. This is due to the inherent benefit of non-combustible construction in reducing the potential for fires and to also control the spread of fires. Therefore, the use of combustible materials as finish and siding is regulated for these types of buildings. The use of combustible material on the exterior of a building is regulated to reduce the potential for vertical fire spread where Fire Department apparatus cannot reach these materials. Request: To allow the use of wood trim and decorative elements on the exterior of the building including those areas that will exceed three stories above grade. All 3x wood tom and decorative materials will be fire retardant pressure treated wood to reduce flame spread. All heavy timber material will remain untreated. Please refer to the small-scale drawings attached to this request for the locations and proposed sizes of the wood Wm decorative materials. Justification: The Code recognizes that the use of wood veneers and siding is acceptable for non-combustible construction as long as the height above grade is limited. This restriction is intended to reduce the potential for fire spread on the exterior of the building to areas above effective hose streams from responding personnel and to limit the spread of fire to the upper floors of a building. The Code allows materials to be provided that are of minimal size or thickness in these applications. Hardwood trim of at least 1 inch nominal thickness and heavy timber is acceptable for use on Type I buildings. It is proposed to provide wood as decorative elements only and it will not be part of the structural elements of the building. This will include door- and window , fascia boards, balcony posts, brackets, and "trusses". The window Fascia boards and boards covering gable trusses will be 3-inch nominal thickness. Balcony posts, brackets and straight members of the gable trusses will be a minimum of 8-inch nominal thickness. All these The 3x wood materials will be fire retardant treated, using a pressure impregnated process in a AMENDMENT TO FIRE & LIFE SAFETY REPORT V31063 - Page 3 FOUR SEASONS HOTEL March 13, 2007 EXTERIOR COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS Revised November 3, 2008 factory setting. No topical treatment is proposed due to the weather conditions at the site. This will minimize any maintenance of fire retardant treatments due to exposure to the elements. The non-bearing heavy timber materials (8x nominal or larger) will not be fire treated. The tom and fascia boards do not run the entire height of the exterior wall. As such, vertical fuel chains are not prevalent. Where wood products vertically stack floor to floor, they are interrupted by concrete balconies and other non-combustible exterior elements to break up any vertical fuel chains. This will reduce the potential for vertical flame spread up the exterior wall of the building. Balconies and operable windows are located throughout the exterior wall of the building. These balconies provide access to the exterior wall and will provide staging areas for Fire Department personnel should hose streams from within the building be required. All of the enclosed stairs containing standpipe hose outlets are less than 200 feet of the exterior wall and balcony, with many of them less than 100 feet. This will allow Fire Department personnel the opportunity to use hose packs fed from within the building should these areas be above the reach of exterior hose applications. The north elevation also provides for much of the exterior wall to be reached by exterior hose stream since this portion of the building is only five stories in height (Level 5 to Levell0). Where portions of the wall are above 40 feet, balconies and operable windows provide access from within the building. The south elevation of the building runs from Level 2 to Level 10. However, this elevation is stepped where vertical fire spread is not prevalent. Access to the exterior wall is provided from the ground and also on multiple floors from roof top balconies and decks. The majority of wood on the east elevation is within reach of exterior hose streams and the amount of wood is limited on this exposure. The west elevation has access from the exterior and from within the building through balconies and operable windows. The combination of exterior and interior access for hose stream applications, along with the limited application of wood, reduces the potential for vertical flame spread on the exterior of the wall. The nominal thickness of the wood members, as well as the fire retardant treated applications AMENDMENT TO FIRE & LIFE SAFETY REPORT V31063 - Page 4 FOUR SEASONS HOTEL March 13, 2007 EXTERIOR COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS Revised November 3, 2008 for the smaller dimension pieces further reduces to the potential for flame spread. The extent of wood on the exterior walls is limited. The primary exterior materials are all non-combustible stone, plaster and fiber-cement siding and trim. The use of wood is limited, including the areas of the building that exceed three stories. Mere 2-44Gh wood ~s , €ire spread- The potential for fire spread in the wood elements is limited, since they are mostly heavy timber. This is afso recognized by the IBC in Section 704.2 that allows balconies or similar projections to be of heavy timber construction when installed on buildings of Type I or II construction, without limitation to the height above grade. Section 603, item 16 also directs the code user to Section 602.4.7 which allows heavy timber columns and arches on the exterior of the building provided the fire separation distance is at least 20 feet. The use of heavy timber products in the proposed application for this project meets the intent of these sections. All lot lines are located a minimum of 20 feet away from the exterior face of the building. It should also be noted that fire retardant treated wood that is impregnated with chemicals in a pressure treated application has a flame spread rating of 25 or less. Section 603.1 of the Code allows combustible insulation to be installed in non- combustible buildings when they have a flame spread rating of 25 or less, similar to fire retardant treated wood. Furthermore, foam plastic insulation up to 4 inches thick can be used on exterior walls of any height when having a flame spread rating of 25 or less. The fire retardant treated wood in this proposal provides the same level of protection as would be afforded by foam or other combustible insulation products. Summary: This request provides a level of protection and life safety that meets the intent required by Code. Although the use of combustible materials on the exterior walls for this project exceeds the height allowed by Code, the type and application of the wood material reduces the potential for fire ignition and spread. The majority of the exterior materials are fully non-combustible. They are either cement board, plaster or stone products. The combustible materials are used for trim and decorative and non-structural elements only. The decorative elements are of either fire-resistance AMENDMENT TO FIRE & LIFE SAFETY REPORT FOUR SEASONS HOTEL EXTERIOR COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS V31063 - Page 5 March 13, 2007 Revised November 3, 2008 treated 3x material or of substantial thickness meeting heavy timber criteria and the potential for fire ignition and spread is minimal. It is unlikely that fire will spread up the exterior wall through the heavy timber either of these types of materials. In addition, the amount of combustible materials used throughout the entire exterior wall under the proposed application is less than would be allowed if used throughout the three stories allowed by Code. We respectfully request your approval. Upon approval, this document will become an attachment to the Fire & Life Safety Report prepared for this project. Prepared by: ROLF JENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. i- Sean S. Donohue, P.E. C~ ~p0 L/' )Q.•'g. DON 37299 LLJ Reviewed by: SDlTD:bp Date V31063/Exterior Materials AMR Revised 11-03-08 Todd Daily, P.E. Date TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Permit # B06-0196 Project PRJ03-0468 Job Address: I VAIL RD VAIL Status ISSUED Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD Applied..: 07/18/2006 Parcel No...: 210107101016 Issued . 12/08/2008 AzU'- ~ - Expires. 09/26/2007 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR LAYTON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC 9090 S. SANDY PARKWAY SANDY UTAH 84040 License: 333-A APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS 600 FOSHAY TOWER 821 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 License: C000001981 07/19/2006 07/19/2006 Phone: (801) 568-9090 07/19/2006 Phone: 612-332-1500 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Occupancy Type Factor Sq Feet Valuation NIGHT CLUBS (A2) ZONE 4 IB 299.08 27,353 $8,180,735.24 CHURCHES (A3) ZONE 4 IB 369.90 8,605 $3,182,989.50 BUSINESS(B)&: HMP (H5 ZONE 4 IB 300.40 31,130 $9,351,452.00 EDUCATIONAL (E) ZONE 4 IB 322.53 670 $216,095.10 INDUSTRIAL/MOD HAZ ( ZONE 4 IB 183.77 29,600 $5,439,592.00 MERCANTILE (M) ZONE 4 IB 220.56 2,445 $539,269.20 RESIDENTIAL/HOTELS ( ZONE 4 IB 302.22 86,991$26,290,420.02 RESIDENTIAL/MULTFAM( ZONE 4 IB 250.22 133,695$33,453,162.90 STORAGE/MOD HAZ (Sl) ZONE 4 IB 169.75 23,080 $3,917,830.00 STORAGE/LOW HAZ(S2) ZONE 4 IB 167.15 75,773$12,665,456.95 Totals 399,510$103,237,002.9* TOV Adjusted Valuation: 3,237,002.91 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $237,002.91 +**r**+**********+**r*******s:****+**s+***+a*r******►** ***rs#*******s*sr******r********e*ete**************++*e■***+r*s**** FEE SUMMARY Building > 378, 777.45 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees 157, 177. 90 Plan Check 378,777.45 Recreation Fee--------------> 399, 510 . 00 Additional Fees-----------> $6, 015 . 00 y Investigation-> $0.00 TOTAL FEES > 157, 177. 90 Total Permit Fee---------- > 163, 192.90 Will Call-----> $3.00 Payments > 163,192.90 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0. 00 Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e-mailed to applicant. 12/18/2006 cdavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set for plan < by TOV 12/13/06. An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer. 03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR:1215- G&E permit approval only. Conditic 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only 06/12/2007 CDAVIS Action: PA Tower Crane footing pads. No additional fees assessed 07/16/2007 jplano Action: CR Additional work being requested to be adder phasing, correction letter sent. 08/01/2007 jplano Action: CR Second correction letter sent, insuffient supplied. 3) The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design profession architect and/or engineer. The design professionals are to verify that the additic being requested is not in conflict with the corrections that are requested regard: building permit. All sheets are to be stamped and signed by the associated design professional. The architectural and the plumbing sheets have not been stamped. The stamp on the stri sheets has not been signed. The stamp on the electrical sheets has not been signer 4 There is insufficient detail to approve this submittal. Some examples are: a) There are several sections that are pertinent to this request that are not pro' b) The elevator pit sections 10/S4.04, 18/54.04, 19/54.04, 20/54.04 are missing. c) Ramp transition section 22/56.01, 6/56.01, 7/54.04 are missing d) Exterior foundation wall connection to the matt slab 9/S6.01D, 27/S6.01, 6/5.0- 7/56.01 e) Sump pit details 28/54.04 and 29/54.04 f) Column schedule, transition of the columns to slab? g) Slab steps 11/S6.01D. This review has stopped because of lack of information. 5 The Public Works Department in Vail has not approved the submittal for additionz be added to the phasing. Their approval will be necessary. 08/06/2007 jplano Action: PA Additional work approved for phasing. Unden plumbing, underground electrical, rebar and concrete placement for elevator and si APPROVAL FOR MAT SLAB 09/11/2007 jplano Action: AP 10/22/2007 DPLACE Action: PA No charge. 10/22/2007 dplace Action: PA 11/13/2007 ependley Action: AP stamps. No added valuation. 11/15/2007 ependley Action: AP Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 11/30/2007 jplano Action: AP Full permit approved, see conditions REV 4 IR 5881: Approved shop drawings for REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAI REV5/IR6042. Approved shop drawings for de: Rev7/IR6058. Approved RFI-0237, No added vi Rev6/IR6057. Approved RFI-0221, No added vz Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 12/18/2007 JPLANO Action: AP Rev9/IR6236. Approved shop drawings for po: slabs, no added valuation 12/26/2007 jplano Action: AP Rev10/IR6252. Approved changing a post ten: with thickened slab. $120.00 due 12/27/2007 MROYER Action: AP Revll/IR6266,6267. Rebar shop drawings rev: appropiate stamps, no charge 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA REV 12 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER LAYTON ST #05510-004 (EMBEDS @ LEVEL 1, 2, 3 ns 4) FROM JT STEEL NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA EV.13 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER SUBMITTAL (STUD RAILS, LEVELS 4 & 5) FROM SUNCOAST NO ADDTIONAL CHARGE 06/10/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev14,15,16, IR6685,6687,7744 are approved of plan review due, $720.00 07/08/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 19, IR 7989 are approved, Bulletins 10,25,29,31,35,40 - 8 hours of plan review due, $480.00 08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev17, IR 7777 are approved, Bulletins 023 swimming pool revisions, $360 due 08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 20, IR8245 are approved, storm and sewE connetions outside the building, public works has approved it. No charge from Sat( 09/29/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev18, IR7988 are approved. The sub-duct s, the dryers and range hoods are not approved. 46 hours of plan review due = $2760.( 12/04/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev22/IR9384 - This is the revised ADMOD t( wood above 40'. This is to be approved by the tire department to be issued. No chE 12/18/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev23/IR9488, Additional tire-stopping subr approved, no charge 01/02/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev21/IR9008, Approved Bulletins 036, 037, 043, 044, 050, 051, 052, 055, 056 and firestopping submittal. 055, generator fueling needs fire department approval prior to issuance 056, deck extention needs DRB approval prior to issuance 29 hours of plan review due=$1740.00 Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the H( Utility relocation permit request. The applicant shall remove only those trees wh: absolutely necessary for the utility relocation work. 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the al to dewater the site. 03/31/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning recieved a bond to cover the Grad: Excavation in the amount of 3.2 million. Planning has approved the grading and ex( permit. 06/25/2007 Warren Action: COND Planning has approved the tull building pei dated recieved on May 29, 2007, with a single condition. A complete Design Review will need to be submitted for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs the pool deck to West Meadow Drive. 08/20/2007 Warren Action: AP The set of plans provided to allow tro the some work prior to release of a tull building permit has been approved. The plans stamped July 26, 2007 09/05/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning is approving the set of plans dat( 2007, with the condition that the applicant submits a revised landscaping plan toi approval prior to requesting a TCO. 11/02/2007 GRUTHER Action: AP REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAI 06/12/2008 Warren Action: AP The planning departmetn signs ott on Bullei 23A with one condition. The gate on teh new set of stairs shal be as the base of t on the pool deck not on the top of the stairs adjacent to Meadow Drive. 09/26/2008 Warren Action: CR Regarding the above permit my only comment need a detail of the gate at the top of the stairs serving as an exit from the poc This detail shall be depict the desired gate which fits not only the aesthetics of Season but that of the Meadow Drive streetscape. The design should take into accoi for security from the public side of the fence and be design with this in mind. Fc the Town does not want to see a nice gate submitted, approved, and installed and t of security reason we add a piece of plexi-glass to the gate as an afterthought. are dated 5-8-08 Bullentin #40. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding. Review: Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied: 1. Fire Dept staging on south side of the west end. The hydrant on the west side. Sheet A0.3.00 2. Sheet A0.3.05 does not show an acc, Fire Command Center. 3. The plans submitted by RJA are not 4. The plans show a dead end corridor project is shown on east end. The apporved end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on E~ptable route to the interior of the buildinc stamped and are labeled "Not for Constructic behind the front desk. 5. 12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is g] Relocate electrical disconnect to site. Location as proposed on pla 03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: 07/11/2007 McGee Action: as submitted 7 11 07. 09/07/2007 McGee Action: the z su PA AP AP AP trailer or provide ready access on southwest bmitted 12/13/06 is not accepted. g and e permit is approved For G & E only Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3A approved for l: The full permit is approved as noted: Life Safety Report 5 22 07 1. LSR, MOU's, and Admin Mod's must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protect: of Record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not RJA alledgedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence ha: presented. 3. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans, is not accepted. 5. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additions 12/08/2008 MAH Action: AP Rev21/IR9008 - This is the revised ADMOD fc wood above 401. This is to be approved by the fire department to be issued. No chi SB. PER VERBAL FROM MIKE VAUGHAN, OK TO APPROVE FOR FIRE. Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 10/20/2006 is Action: DN Awaiting for additional information 12/20/2006 is Action: PA Approval to allow grading and prep work foi installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for t access for small construction vehicles ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive. 03/26/2007 is Action: PA Staging plan for Phase 1 of the G&E permit only. Engineer approval for the G&E permit still required currently under review. staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only 08/07/2007 csalli Action: AP additional work proposed for phased permit no approval for mat slab 09/13/2007 csalli Action: DN waiting for executed MOU 10/04/2007 TK Action: AP Approved Building Permit with the condtion: the memo dated 8/5/07 from Chad Salli. 07/31/2008 csalli Action: AP revised sheets C17, C20 dated 7/18/08 and C18A, C19 dated 7/1/08 approved Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS Item: 05700 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ~ VANCF~Y TELEPHONE AT 479-2149 OR T OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM -4 PM. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEK CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit # B06-0196 as of 01-06-2009 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS J. BRINK 612-332-1500 Job Address: I VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Conditions: Cond: CON0008815 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3/28/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 Applied: 07/18/2006 Issued: 12/08/2008 To Expire: 09/26/2007 The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the full building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original comment number for clarity. General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule" to prevent a room that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor". The Fire and Life Safety Report prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants. These will be required for full permit issuance. General: The Fire & Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved prior to the approval for full building permit. 3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units 3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is discharging. 8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C-414, is actually a horizontal portion of Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or remove the designation of passageway. 10) See the general comment above. 11) See the general comment above. 12) See the general comment above. 13) See the general comment above. 16) See the general comment above. 22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be tested in accordance with ASTME 1 19, tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire-resistance rating not less than the fire-resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the window when responding for full building permit. 23) See the general comment above. 39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures. Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly. This item has no impact on the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building permit issuance. 42) See response the comment number 39. 46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space is not accessory. 46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 21 OA as there is no access to stair Q. Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel. 49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved by the Town of Vail's Building Official. 57 through 61 and 149) The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 14 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 17 (BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FRAMING INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED FOR. Cond: 35 (P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: 5 (PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPRINT SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC. Cond: CON0009095 The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review aplication for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs added from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive, within 30 days of the release of the building permit. Cond: CON0009121 The applicant shall submit a seperate Design Review application for review and approval for all signage design, locations, and materials prior to installation. Cond: CON0009294 The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan which addresses the landscaping conflicts created by the shallow soild depths on the culvert containing Spraddle Creek. This plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to requesting a certifcate of occupancy. Cond: CON0009330 SAFEbuilt Colorado Conditions of Approval To: Layton Construction Re: Full Building Permit Conditions of Approval The following conditions will be required to be addressed prior to construction. Sufficient time shall be granted for review, response and approval before work is initiated. Building Department- The items listed within the building department comments are numbered to correspond with the 3 round comment letter dated 08/21/2007. 46. Change the exiting from Vestibule 210A. It appears to exit through intervening room that is not accessory to the vestibule. HGA Response: We submit that the adjacent space is accessory. Vestibule 210A services mechanical rooms and the service elevators. To exit from Vestibule 210A the occupants have to pass through Vestibule 275A, which is basically for the spa staff, then through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area, then to hallway 279, then through exit passageway 293, then through exit passageway 297, then to exit discharge. The issue is that the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area is not accessory to the mechanical rooms. It is accessory for the rooms off Vestibule 275A for the staff of the spa but not the mechanical areas. Please change the layout accordingly. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Vestibule 210A is purely circulation space and does not carry an occupant load. This vestibule provides connection between the Spa and the service elevators, IDF Room 210, and Mechanical Room 257. Relative to egress, it provides the egress route for the one occupant from IDF 210 and the one occupant from Mechanical 257 (as shown on A0.3.02). IDF 210, Mechanical 257, Vestibule 210A, and Service Elevator Lobby E-202 are considered to be part of the overall Spa as they serve Spa functions. The service elevators stop at this location solely to provide connection to the Spa. IDF 210 houses audio-visual, telephone, and data system equipment that specifically serves the Spa and must be accessed by Spa personnel. Similarly, Mechanical 257 houses the equipment serving the pools within Room 255 and must be accessed by Spa staff. In summary, we submit that all these spaces are part of the overall Spa and are "accessory" to each other. Therefore, current layout provides egress that complies with IBC 1013.2 as the spaces are accessory, are not hazard occupancies, and provide a discernible path of travel to an exit. This comment is in reference to the electrical room #212. Please revise 64. A2.03.1 - Wall tag both shafts located in room 304 (storage room). Wall tags must reference an approved assembly from the partition schedule. HGA Response: Wall tag has been added. One shaft in room 304 does not have wall tags. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The drawing has been updated to include wall tags for this shaft. Still have one shaft not tagged Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. 152. Provide accessible parking spaces per IBC Table 1106.1. Providing 212 spaces would require 7 to be accessible, 2 of those to be van accessible. Verify 98" of vertical clearance for the van spots. HGA Response: We submit that the number of accessible parking stalls complies with IBC Table 1106.1 and section 1106.5. The hotel is operating on 100% valet parking stalls, with an additional 59 self-park stalls for fractional ownership, full ownership, and employee. Per Table 11 06.1, 3 stalls are required for the self-parking, and at least one of the three is required to be van accessible. Plan sheet A0.3.01 indicates there are 228 parking spaces. Spaces marked for Valet parking number 78. With those counts, Table 1 106.1.3 would require 5 accessible spaces with one van accessible space. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Per previous response, most of the parking spaces are valet only. There are 59 self-park stalls that will be allocated to fractional ownership, full ownership condos, and employees. The drawings have been updated to identify each space as either valet or self-park. We submit that only the 59 self-park stalls are considered per Table 1106.1 and that the number of accessible spaces required are provided. Deducting the 78 Valet parking from the total spaces, you are still required to add two additional accessible spaces for a total number of 5 accessible spaces. 155. All the massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. Please amend the toilet facilities, changing rooms, lavatories, tubs and the showers meet to accessibility requirements of the ANSI Al 17.1-98. (IBC 1109.14.3) HGA Response: We submit the Wet Massage Suite #289 complies with the accessibility requirements of ANSI A117.1-98 (IBC 1109.14.3). All massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We disagree that IBC 1109.14.3 requires that ALL spa treatment rooms be accessible. IBC 1109.14 pertains to "recreational facilities". If the Spa is going to be considered a "recreational facility" then it should be considered as a whole. As such, the Spa is accessible - it provides accessibility at the entry/reception, locker rooms, toilets, showers, whirlpools, lounges, treatment rooms, etc. We submit that nothing requires ALL treatment rooms to be accessible any more than ALL lockers, ALL toilets, or ALL showers. Add grab bars at the tub in room 289 for accessibility. 167. We are unable to locate a designated accessible Type "A" condominium per Section 1 107.6.2 of the 2003 IBC. As the condominiums are a different type of R-2 occupancy from the time-share units, an accessible Type "A" condominium is required. HGA Response: Since only 16 condominiums are proposed, no Type "A" units are required. Refer to IBC 1107.6.2.1.1. With the condominiums, employee housing and timeshare units there are a total of 63 units classified as an R-2 occupancy group. Per Section 1107.6.2.1.1 Type A units shall be dispersed among the various classes of units. Therefore a Type A accessible unit is required in each of the following groups: the condominiums, the employee housing, and the timeshare units. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): To resolve this issue we have revised Condo #8 (on Level 9, sheet A4.28.1)) to be a "Type A" unit per ICC/ANSI A117. 1. Two accessible employee housing units and one accessible timeshare unit are already provided and indicated on the drawings. Comment 169-180 - Submit a Memorandum of Understanding to the Town of Vail for approval by the Building Official to reference the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1. If accepted by the town, please revise entire plan to comply with the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1 in its entirety. If not accepted please revise plans per 1998 ANSI A-117.1 and comments above. 169. In the accessible units in the guest rooms of the R-1 occupancy, all bathing & toilet facilities are required to be accessible per Chapter 6 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: We submit that the accessible units include the accessible bathing and toilet facilities and comply with Chapter 6 of ANSI A 117.1. Plan sheet A4.07.1 A and A4.07.1 B for Unit PR-HC shows a raised platform in media room # 116 which does not have an accessible route. Also, bathrooms/rooms # 103, # 108, # 109, # 110, # 133 do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The raised platform within Media 1 16 is intended to provide tiered seating within this "home theater". We submit that an accessible route is not required for this small platform as it is less than 25% of the overall room and the remainder of the room is accessible. While this room is not an "assembly" space, we submit that IBC 1108.2.4. 1, exception 2 provides guidance regarding this room. See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.06.1 for Unit 2KK-HC has bathrooms/rooms #103, #108 which do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.05.3 for Unit 1 K-HC has bathroom # 103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.04AA for Unit ES2-HC has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.01.1 for Unit KI-H1 has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Unit type K1-HI is a unit for the hearing impaired. It is not an accessible unit. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We submit that only one accessible bathroom is required within an accessible hotel unit. This requirement is consistent with the federal standard - ADAAG Chapter 9. To interpret IBC Chapter I 1 as requiring that ALL bathrooms must be accessible is to raise the standard beyond the federal requirements. We submit that this is not reasonable, does not reflect industry standard, and is not the intent of the IBC / ICC. Rather, we submit that the IBC / ICC intends to coordinate and correlate with the federal standards. As an example, we can examine the accessibility requirements for condominiums. The federal standard is the FHA Fair Housing Design Manual. This document allows condo units to be provided with one "Specification B" bathroom and that is the highest level of accessibility. Similarly, the 2003 edition of ICC / ANSI A117.1 has been revised to better correlate to FHA and require that "Type A" units provide "at least one" accessible bathroom . The common thread is the requirement is for one or "at least one" accessible bathroom - not all. Since the ADAAG, FHA Design Manual, and A117 (2003) all require one or "at least one" accessible bathroom it is reasonable to interpret the IBC's requirements in the same manner. Otherwise, all the hotel units would be held to a higher standard than the condominium units within the same building. 170. In Type "A" dwelling units of the R-2 occupancies, all toilet and bathing facilities must comply with Sections 1002.11.1 through 1002.11.7 of ANSI A117.1. Some Type "A" dwelling units have bathrooms which do not comply. Please clarify. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We request that ICC/ANSI A 117.1 - 2003 be used as the applicable edition relative to the "Type A" condominium. This is the most recent version of A117 and our research has found that the various revisions in Chapter 10 were intended to correct the intent of various provisions and to better coordinate with federal requirements (FHA and ADA). Per 1003.1 1.1 of the Al 17-2003, at least one bathroom is required to comply with 1003.11. This correlates with FHA requirements ("Specification B" bathrooms) and Chapter 9 of the ADA. Therefore, we submit that the latest intent of the various codes and standards is that at least one bathroom, but not all, is required to comply with 1003.11. 17 1. In Type "A" dwelling units, a permanent seat is required at the head end of the bathtub per Section 607 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): ICC/ANSI A] 17.1 - 1998, 607.3 states that a permanent seat OR a removable in-tub seat shall be provided. However, 1002.1 1.6, exception 1, states that the removable in-tub seat required by 607.3 is NOT required. Since 607.3 gives the option of either permanent or removable seats, we submit that the true intent of 1002.1 1.6, exception 1 is to NOT require either type of seat. ICC / ANSI A 117.1 - 2003 carries similar language, but also includes Figure 1003.1 1.8 (a) to clarify that the seat (permanent or removable) can be omitted. 172. In Type "A" dwelling units, clearance in front of bathtubs shall extend the length of the bathtub and shall be 30 inches wide minimum per Section 607 of ANSI A] 17. 1. Some of the bathtubs have lavatories encroaching into the required clearances. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required bathtub clear floor area is indicated. 173. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.11.1 of ANSI A117.1, doors shall not swing into the clear floor or ground space or clearance for any fixture, unless a clear floor space of 30 inches minimum by 48 inches minimum is located beyond the arc of the door swing. There are water closet compartments and some other bathroom areas that do not meet those requirements. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. The door swings do not swing into the other clear floor spaces. 174. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.13 of ANSI A] 17. 1, where operable windows are provided, at least one window in each sleeping, living, or dining space shall have operable parts complying with Section 1002.13 of ANSI A117. 1. All windows of "accessible units" shall comply with Section 309 of ANSI A117.1, Operable Parts. Provide documentation showing compliance. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. A note has been added to indicate requirement that all operable windows (and sliding doors) comply with 1002.13. 175. For Type "A" and "accessible units", provide details showing accessibility compliance for the operable parts of the showers, lavatory height, lavatory knee and toe clearance, and bathroom mirror height per Section 1002.11 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to interior elevations shown within the Interior Design drawings. I am unable to locate the Interior Design Drawings in the plan set submitted. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to accessibility details illustrated on sheet A0.4.3. 180. For Type "A" dwelling units, provide details showing accessibility compliance for kitchen work surfaces, sinks, range controls, and refrigerator/freezer requirements per Section 1002.12 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to cornment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required kitchen features are illustrated. 183. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the condominiums, some "U" shaped kitchens do not have the required 60 inch minimum clearance between opposing base cabinets per Section 1003.12 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Sheets A4.22.1, A4.25.1, and A4.30.1 have been revised to provide 60" clearance at U-shaped kitchens. Provide corrected plan sheets. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These sheets are included in the 7/18/07 resubmittal set. 185. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the time share units, the water closets do not have required clearances and some doors encroach required clearances per Section 1003.11.2 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Refer to the response to comment # 186 below. As such, there are no Type "B" timeshare units. See response to comment # 186. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to response to comment #186. 186. Is Option "A" being used for the bathroom fixtures in the Type "B", Time-share units? If so, each fixture is required to meet the requirements of the option per Section 1003.11.3.1 of ANSI Al 17.1. Please clarify. HGA Response: As previously discussed and resolved, the timeshare units are transient occupancy (similar to hotel units) and not residences. As such, one accessible timeshare unit is provided per IBC Table 1107.6.1.1. This accessible unit is #3103 located on Level 03. The enlarged plan for this accessible unit is on sheet A4.12.1 A and the associated H/C bathroom in 2/A4.12.2A. Provide signed letters from persons representing the operating authority for this facility stating that the timeshare units will not be used as residences. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These letters will be submitted by ownership 203. Enclose both mechanical rooms on the 9th level in 2 hour rated construction, it appears that the 2 hour shafts from below terminate in these rooms. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet M4.06 (Part Plan Attachment No. M06). The Area 3A mechanical room is unrated, and the 2 hour rated vertical risers through the building through the 8th floor slab. In order to avoid the installation of inaccessible fire dampers at the top of the riser, RYBKA have revised sheet M4.06 to ductwork is to be fire rated in the attic space. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. The Area 3B mechanical room is a 2 hour rated room that ends at column line A14. The ductwork that extends to the south across column line A 14 is 2 hour fire rated to avoid the installation of fire dampers in inaccessible locations. Fire dampers are shown in the penetrations of the two hour rated Area 3B mechanical room, where ductwork exist the mechanical room. A) The mechanical room on the 9th level over "AREA-03A"has not been addressed on the plan sheets. The partial ninth floor plan on 8 ''/z" x 1 1" indicate wrapping ducts. If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. Ductwork is to be wrapped to provide 2 hour fire rating in attic space. (Refer to Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03). Provide architectural details rated enclosure. B) In the mechanical room labeled 911 the rated walls do not appear to enclose the room entirely. The wall is labeled 30 minutes on the north end and the wall is labeled I hour where Trash 912 (above "AREA-0313") is located on sheet A0.3.09. There are 3 duct penetrations in this area to be addressed, 28x10 S/E F/B, 24x18 G/e F/B and 24x14 S/A F/A T/B. Rybka Response: Refer to Architectural Sheet A0.3.09 where Mechanical Room 911 is to be provided with 2 hour rating. Three ducts identified enter riser shaft from Mechanical Room 911 and riser is considered to be connected to and form part of mechanical room and so no fire smoke damper is provided. The ducts in question enter a shaft in the floor below within Maid Room G-711. Fire/Smoke Dampers are required where these ducts enter the shaft. One duct is not in a shaft. Please address accordingly. C) How will the 2 hour shaft assembly be maintained at EF-14 and EF-30? If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be rated for operation within rated enclosures by fan manufacturer or are to be relocated within Mechanical Room 911. Provide architectural details for the shafts. 214. Add a fire/smoke damper to the penetration by the 8x6 duct that penetrates the 30 minute fire partition on page M2.08.1 on grid line I 1 and between A9 and A 10. Rybka Response: Fire dampers are not required in one hour rated fire barriers per IMC 607.5.2. (Refer to Response No. 208.) This is not a fire barrier; it is a fire partition defining a rated corridor. A fire/smoke damper is required for this duct. Rybka Response: Combination fire smoke damper is provided where this duct exits the rated shaft. The response indicates an f/s damper has been added to the duct as exits the rated shaft. A smoke damper is required where it penetrates the rated corridor. 215. Fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Rybka Response: Mechanical floor plan sheets, sheets M2.01.1 thru M2.11.1 have been revised to show: it Combination fire smoke dampers (FSD) or shunt duct* on rated shaft penetrations. " FD in duct floor penetrations when no more than three floors are penetrated, and it FD on 2 hour rated wall penetrations. * shunt ducts per NFPA 90A (2002), Figure A.5.3. NFPA 90A is not an adopted document by the Town of Vail or referenced in the IMC. The review team is not familiar with the term "shunt duct". Fire smoke dampers are required at the shaft and corridor duct penetrations. (IMC 607.5.3, 607.5.4 and 607.5.5.1) Rybka Response: The 2006 IMC now calls the use of 22" upturned sheet metal ducts in 2 hour fire rated risers as 'sub ducts'. The provision of the 'sub duct' is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. The use of sub ducts on the project is shown in Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03. M2.03.1 - Remove designations for shunt ducts for the ducts run in the garage exhaust shaft. Rybka Response: EF-8, EF-43 and residential dryer exhaust have been shown terminating in a vertical areaway (garage exhaust riser) that is always being exhausted by EF-1 B on emergency power. It was agreed during the June TOV plan review meeting that this condition is analogous to the 'sub duct' provisions identified earlier. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 2. In Group B and R occupancies equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 of the International Building Code, smoke dampers are not required at penetrations of shafts where kitchen, clothes, dryer, bathroom and toilet room exhaust openings with steel exhaust subducts, having a wall thickness of at least 0.019 inch (0.48 mm) extend at least 22 inches (559 mm) vertically and the exhaust fan at the upper terminus is powered continuously in accordance with the provisions of Section 909.11 of the International Building Code, and maintains airflow upward to the outdoors. The drawings are still substantially incomplete when labeling FSD's. I will attempt to identify some locations. It will be up to the design team to identify all locations. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts exit rated shafts. All drawings are indicting F.D. on the bathroom exhausts where penetrating the shaft. There is an administrative modification request to eliminate dampers on the bathroom exhausts. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FD designations at restroom exhausts have been deleted where 'sub-ducts' are provided per the administrative modification. The drawings are indicating ducts from below and ducts from above. Please create a tag for sub-ducts and clearly mark the plans on all the ducts that are to be utilizing this system. M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-301 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 2-8x6 ducts and 1-10x6 duct. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-311 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 1-8x 10 duct and 1-12x6. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-301 and C-311 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - All duct penetrations through the shafts are marked F.D. These are required to be FSD. There are too many to list individually. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts penetrate rated shafts. There are multiple places that indicate FSD's where an administrative modification has been requested to utilize a 22" sub-duct. Please coordinate. M2.04.1 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-401 and C-41 1 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.04.1 - There is a 14x10 duct supplying corridor C-411 missing a damper designation. The duct is near A9.9 and 11/11.4. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. This duct has changed size to 12x8 since last review. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) These are just a few of the un-complying damper designations, stopped review on this correction. Again, fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Reconfiguration is still necessary. 216. Ductwork, pipes and electrical are prohibited in an exit passageways unless serving the exit passageway. It appears that above non-rated ceilings in the exit passageways the space is being used as a plenum and contains construction elements not allowed, please address all exit passageways. Rybka Response: Mechanical services not associated with exit passageways have been relocated. The review team's interpretation of IBC 1020.5 is that any ductwork serving an exit passageway shall be a completely separate system from the rest of the building and separate from all other passageways. Also, this system is required for pressurization. 1020.5 Penetrations. Penetrations into and openings through an exit passageway are prohibited except for required exit doors, equipment and ductwork necessary for independent pressurization, sprinkler piping, standpipes, electrical raceway for fire department communication and electrical raceway serving the exit passageway and terminating at a steel box not exceeding 16 square inches (0.010 m2). Such penetrations shall be protected in accordance with Section 712. There shall be no penetrations or communicating openings, whether protected or not, between adjacent exit passageways. Rybka Response: It is our understanding that only portions of the building service systems that serve the exit enclosure are allowed to penetrate the exit enclosure. We note that IBC 1019.1.3, VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURE, VENTILATION, Item .2 permits HVAC equipment (FCUs) to be located in the exit enclosure: 1019.1.3 Ventilation. Equipment and ductwork for exit enclosure ventilation shall ....where located within the building, be separated from the remainder of the building, including other mechanical equipment, with construction as required for shafts. All ductwork serving the exit passageways shall be protected at the point of penetration of the passageway with a fire/smoke damper. The passageway is an extension of the vertical exit enclosure that it serves and lesser protection is not allowed. (1017.1) Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, and have provided FSD where make-up air ductwork penetrates the exit enclosure. M2.03. I- There is a duct termination shown in Stair Q exit enclosure, labeled "16x12 Employee Dryer T/A". This is not allowed in an exit enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been revised to show routing of dryer exhaust so that it does not pass through Stair Q. M2.04.1 - There is an 8x6 duct penetration within the exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.04.1 - There is a transfer opening 24x4 within exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization; this transfer opening is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.05.3 - There is a 6" duct shown penetrating Stair N exit enclosure. Please move out of the enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.05.3 has been revised and ductwork has been rerouted so as not to pass through Stair N. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-601 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the elevator lobby and maid's room. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-601. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 3.3/4 and A 11. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - There is a duct penetration between Exit Passageway C-601 and Stair S-601. Penetrations are not allowed. (IBC 1019.1.2) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-611 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-61 1 is not deliberate and is to be deleted. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 and a 12x6 duct passing through Exit Passageway C-61 1. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. Grid lines 11/11.4 and A8.2/A9.9. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There is a 20x10 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-611. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 133/134.3 and BC/BD. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.2 - There is a 12x10 duct penetrating the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that Stair S-605 is connected to exit passageway C-614. and that the 'unlabeled passageway' is rated 2 hours, this upper level of the hallway is rated to provide separation between levels 4 and 5 and this portion of the ceiling space does connect to a rated vertical exit enclosure, the hallway is not an exit passageway, and that 1020.5 does not apply. M2.06.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: See previous comment. M2.07.2 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-717 are not intended to function as returns, are to be shown 'blanked-off and are provided for aesthetic reasons only. M2.07.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.3 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.08.1 and M2.08.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-803. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. Penetrations are not allowed fire wrapped or not. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. These comments are still outstanding. Tim Willings P.E. with Rybka met with the plans examiner on 8/14/07 to bring updated drawings addressing these corrections. It was advised to submit the drawings when all other comments are addressed. 222. Please address the garage exhaust on the east side of the structure that will cause a nuisance thru the casement windows (W 102) in rooms 5318, 6318 and 7318. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet A2.05.2 for plan location, and sheet A0.7.2 (W 102) for window type. Architect to revise window to be fixed type. HGA Response: The architectural documents have been revised to provide fixed windows at these three locations. The architectural drawings are indicating windows W 102. This window is casement not fixed on sheet A0.7.2. Please coordinate. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Revised drawings indicating fixed windows at these locations are included with this resubmittal. Since this review, the Town of Vail has informed our review team that garage exhausts on the C02 detectors are product-conveying outlets requiring being 10' above grade, 10' from openings into the building and 10' from property lines. The continuous fan is considered environmental, thus allowing 3' from openings and 3' from property lines. Please address accordingly. 224. Please indicate how the 18" flue from the gas ironer, on the 3rd level is routed thru the loading dock above on the 4th level. Rybka Response: Laundry gas-fired flat ironer vent leaves the laundry room at level 3 (Sheet M2.03.1) and runs vertically through the building in a rated chase with fire enclosed offsets before being vented at the roof of level 11 (Sheet M2.11.1). M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Provide architectural details for the shaft. 228. Specify on the plans the location of EC-1, Type I fan for the kitchen. Rybka Response: Sheet M4.04 has been revised to show Ecology Unit EC-1 in Ecology Room M-402A. Ecology Room M-402A as designed is a component of the grease duct enclosure. "The duct enclosure shall serve a single grease exhaust duct system and shall not contain any other ducts, piping, wiring or systems." Remove the other exhaust fans, ducting and electrical within the room not associated with the Type 1 duct. (IMC 506.3. 10) Rybka Response: The 2 hour rated architectural enclosure of the Ecology unit has been reconfigured to that only the ductwork and equipment associated with the commercial kitchen exhaust is contained within the Ecology Room M-402A. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour wall and 90 minute door that is shown on the mechanical drawings. 233. Indicate on the plans that the 36" dryer duct and the 18" flue from the Ironer are in a 2 hour shaft on the 6th level, page M2.06.1. Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, the 36" dryer exhaust duct and 18" gas-fired flat ironer vent that both run horizontally at level 6 (on sheet M2.06. I ) are to be in a 2-hr fire rated enclosure. M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. (from comment 224) Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour shaft walls and details for construction. Please show compliance to IBC 707.11 for the bottom of the shaft housing the 34" dryer duct. 234. Provide manufacturers instructions to verify the dryers in rooms 312 and 31 OD are capable of exhausting the developed length shown on the plans. Rybka Response: Residential dryer exhaust system shown on Sheet M2.03.1 serving Employee Laundry Room 31 OD and Valet Room 317, with quantity five (4+1) dryer exhaust connections to dryer exhaust EF-43 has been rerouted. In addition to the lint filter integral to the appliance, and auxiliary lint trap and cleanout has been shown on the common dryer exhaust duct system before the duct leaves the Employee Laundry Room 31 OD. The entire length of the residential dryer exhaust duct is to be fire wrapped to maintain clearances to combustibles. Discharge of laundry dryer exhaust is routed to exterior via connection to rated garage exhaust riser. Penetration is protected by fire wrap and minimum 22" shunt duct extended into garage exhaust riser. In addition, RYBKA have specified a laundry exhaust booster fan EF-43 which is interlocked with dryer operation. Dryer exhaust ducts are required to terminate to the outside the building and shall be equipped with a back draft damper, also clothes dryer exhaust ducts shall not extend into or through ducts or plenums. Route the dryer ducts directly to the exterior with a back draft damper. (IMC 504.4) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by showing the backdraft damper. The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 238. The Laundry Layout, page LA1.2, indicates a flue pipe for the dry cleaner in room #317. Add the flue and the 2 hour chase to the architectural sheets and to the mechanical sheets, clarify that it does not pass through a plenum. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.03.1 to show dry cleaning machine exhaust fan EF-8 and ducted connection to outdoors. M2.03.1 - The termination is shown with a 22" sub-duct within the garage exhaust duct. This is not to the exterior as required per IMC 502.7.3.6. The review team also is concerned that when the garage exhaust is not operating the fumes from the dry cleaning can migrate to the garage. Terminate the dry cleaning exhaust to the exterior. Rybka Response: The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 244. Add a 2 hour shaft below and proper opening protection for the duct designated as 24x14 S/A F/A-24x12 S/A T/B on page M2.08.1 on grid line l0A and between 10.5/11. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1 and relocated the duct riser to the protected shaft in the North West corner of the Maids Room G-811. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by properly coordinating the duct offset/riser transfer shown at this level with rated shaft location or rating requirements. These two ducts that transition between shafts that are not aligned between the 8th and 9th floor levels are both to be shown enclosed in a 2 hour rated drywall enclosure, negating the need for combination fire smoke dampers, except where duct connections penetrate the shaft wall (one location). The duct on this level is indicating 24x14 S/A(supply air) F/A(from above). The 9th floor level or the enlarged M4.06 does not show this duct. Please clarify. 245. Add a 2 hour shaft or designate a fire damper for the 28x10 and the 28x14 as it passes through a 2 hour floor/ceiling assembly into the mechanical room above. On page M2.08.1 between grid lines 10.5 /11 and A8.2/A9.9. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1. See comment 4215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that ducts that rise vertically through the building that are protected with two hour fire rated enclosures and are connected to a 2 hour rated mechanical room at the highest level do not have a fire damper at the floor penetration of the mechanical room. Rybka submits that the 2 hour rated shaft enclosure is an extension of the 2 hour rating of the mechanical room fire rated enclosure. There is a 24x10 duct shown penetrating the shaft connecting to the 28x10 duct within the shaft. Add the S/F damper at this location. (The architectural overlays indicate a shaft too small to house the duct?) There is a 24x18 duct shown in this vicinity penetrating the floor/ceiling above. Please address with a fire damper. 246. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 8x10 duct on page M2.07.2 between grid lines A8.2/A9.9 and 10/10.5. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1. The duct has not been addressed on all levels also see comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by coordinating the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7, 8, 9 and 10 and attic levels (Sheets M2.07.2, M2.08.2, M2.09.2, M2.10.2 and M2.1 L I Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft wall (one location each occupied floor). The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands, the duct in question has been changed to 12x18 on the 7th level. 247. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 12x6 duct on page M2.07.1 between grid lines A6/A7 and on grid line 4.2. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1, M2.08.1, M209.1. This duct serving the elevator lobbies has not been addressed. Rybka Response: Rybka will coordinate the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7 in this location with level above and below. Rybka will correct this by rerouting existing ductwork through rated risers provided by HGA in these locations and Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft . The same issue as response to #246. The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands. The supply duct from level 1 I to 10 has no shaft, the duct runs horizontally on the 9th level with no shaft and runs to the 7th level with fire dampers at the floors of the 8th and 9th. This duct requires a shaft. 264. Fire dampers and rated shafts for ductwork through floor/ceiling assemblies are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Refer to response to comment 215 Here are some floor penetrations by ducts that have not been addressed, please evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. M2.03.1 - 12x20 duct, grid lines A4.6 and 2.7/3 The duct in question has changed to 20x 16. The vertical and horizontal shafts need to be shown on the architectural sheets. M2.03.1 - 18x 14 duct, grid lines A 12 and 3.3/4 The horizontal shaft shown on M2.02.1 is not shown on the architectural sheets. M2.04.1 - 16x 10 duct, grid lines A 13 and 3.3/4 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.04 - 12x6 duct, grid lines A 10/A 11 and 10.5/ 11 A fire damper has been added to the 2 floors above. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. M2.04 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A 10/A 11 and 10.5/11 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. The duct is connecting more than 2 stories below the shaft. M2.04 - 6x12 duct, grid lines A10 and 10.5 The drawings have been changed to add fire dampers at the floor line. This duct connects more than 2 stories, a shaft is required. M2.05 - 26x14 R/A, grid lines A6/A7 and 5 A fire damper is required at the floor between the 5th and 6th level. M2.05 - 12x12 paint shop exhaust, 12x12 carpenter exhaust and a 24x12 sanitary duct, grid lines A4.6 and 4/5. These ducts traverse from what appears to be a rated shaft from below through the Resid. Club Concierge Desk (512) room up through the ceiling with no protection. This duct enters a shaft on this level, add a fire damper to the duct as it enters the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.05 - 6x6, 8x6, (2)12x6 and 10x20 ducts, grid lines A10 and 10/10.5 M2.05 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A 10 and 10.5111 Review on duct penetrations through the floors has been stopped. The plans examiner's function is not to make a punch list for the design team. Evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that fire dampers, rated shafts and combination fire smoke dampers have been added to the floor plans in general conformance with requirements of the plan reviewer. Additional damper, combination fir dampers and shaft wall construction will be required where this drawing revision has not correctly identified that they are required. Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. Structural Conditions- The conditions listed are taken from the last comment letter dated 07/18/2007. The open issues are listed in Red. S106 F 9,11,14/S6.0IE Sheet S2.03.2: 12 ft. cantilever retaining wall extension of exterior two span wall below, outside of ballroom areaway on line A 11 between 14 and 14.5 has not been checked and appears to be overstressed for flexure, please check. Consider moment resisting joints at slab to wall connections. Design / detail planter wall. These details require rebar and splices to be shown for proper detailing and construction. Verify cantilever deflection. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S110 F 52.02.4 No calculations have been provided for the cantilevered retaining wall around the pool structure, or on gridline D1. Verify lateral load capacity, consider pedestrian surcharge and water surcharge due to site drains behind this wall as appropriate. Verify footing width. KL&A 6/26/07: Wall in question between gridlines 6-8.5 south of A18 supports roof loads and also is the lateral load path for pool structure loading, and for roof uplift for partially enclosed structures. Wall also is monolithic with Area 3A perimeter building wall. Design is part of EOR's scope, please provide wall designs accounting for support of roof structure. KL&A 8/31/07: Coordinate new retaining wall detail 21/54.03 with foundations shown on plan, S2.02.4. Verify new steel roof around pool structure will resist lateral soil reaction of 1.0 klf, verify metal deck shear strength and connection to resisting perpendicular retaining walls. S128 GS S2.09.3 Top slab bars 1 OT3 & 1 OT6 are shown at line 10.6/A 14. It seems these bars are shown in error as the concrete beam is upturned at this location. Beams south of line A] 2.2 are not identified. Please check. IBC 1603.1. KL&A 6/26/07: Top bars also appear required at gridline A10. 52.09.3 PT profile is incomplete, details are required. KL&A 8/31/07: Top bars are still not shown on plan, please review. S145 LS 1/S3.02C Wall thickness is shown as 8 inches. Plan S201.2 indicates a 12" exterior foundation wall, please coordinate. KL&A 6/26/07: Coordinate reinforcing shown on shear wall elevation with 'W2'or'W3' per S2.01.2, it is unclear which wall type controls for soil lateral loading. Wall must span two way due to stair shaft opening, verify designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S164 LS S2.1 1 Provide detail of roof diaphragm to concrete cores. Provide or indicate detail of steel beams to concrete cores for gravity plus lateral loading, per ASCE 7-02 load combinations. Verify drag loads and chord force detailing at eave framing. Verify diaphragm welding is sufficient for expected shear forces, provide shear and moment diagram at roof deck levels. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7. KL&A 6/26/07: New detail 13/S 1.0.5 B: Welded studs, thickness and dimensions of embed plate are not defined. Please provide this information for all beams and reaction conditions on the drawings. Verify connection is adequate with short slot or long slot holes in the shear tab, if permitted for erection. Provide roof diaphragm calculations per original comment. IBC 1911, 1912, 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S165 LS S2.11 Provide detail of concrete diaphragm to concrete cores, verify shear transfer at each level and comment whether any drags are required. Verify if typical details 12 & 23/S1.0.3A apply throughout the job. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S169 LS S3.02A Calculations show a significant force reversal / back-stay effect from Level 6 to Level 5 shear force, i.e. SW 14 & SW 16. Verify this load path has been designed for the loads per 3D analysis. Verify soil plus wind / seismic loading has been used for drag design. Note per plan, S2.05.1, a large hole exists adjacent to wall SW16, and per calculations page 536, (38+57)=95k shear transfer is required. No drags are shown on plan. Please verify. Note, elevations S3.02A show #5 @ 14" o.c. at upper levels, calculations shown (2) #5 @ 24" o.c., please verify designs match calculations. IBC 1616.1.1, IBC 1604.4. KL&A 6/26/07: Original comment calculated (38+57)=95k load for SW 14 not SW 16 as noted, however collector bars have not been added for SW 14. SW 16 collector load is (86+143)=229k, (4) #7 shown on plan are not adequate for 229k, please review all collector designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S171 S2.11.1-2, etc. Roof framing plans are incomplete. Please address the following and confirm detailing will be provided in future drawings issues, per IBC 1604.2, 2205.1. a) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed b) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed c) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed d) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed e) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed f) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed g) W8 & W16 eave supports do not cantilever outwards and support eave in RAM analysis submitted, instead all load is transferred directly to columns via eave rim beam. Verify eave supports and perimeter girders are adequately sized KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. h) 52.09.3, etc: HSS6x6 to W8, W 14 moment connection at eave needs a detail KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. i) 1 /S2.10.3: W 16x31 on line A 10.5 is shown as W 18x35 per calculations, please verify all beams match calculations. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S172 I /S2.08.3 W 18x46 eave support girder near gridlines CB-C 1 is shown as W2I x44 per calculations; W 1400 on line BE is shown as W21 x48 per calculations. Several cantilevered eave moment connection supports are shown without a backspan member. Please review. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 I /S2.08.3 Verify lateral support of the low roof structure for wind and seismic loading; low roof section is not connected to Level 8 PT slab beyond or core walls within the roof area, and braced frames are not shown. Similar at 2/S2.08.3 and other low roof structures. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 11,26,28/S7.0] A Calculations indicate that roof deck is attached to slab edge along line 2 and other locations where deck and floor slab are near the same elevation. Provide a detail for lateral roof to slab connection where required by lateral analysis. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S174 S2.11.1, etc Show roof diaphragm to concrete core connection, consider in-plane collector shear forces and out of plane anchorage forces. IBC 1604.8.2; ASCE 7, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S175 S2.11.1 Verify diaphragm continuity at dormers line A5 between upper roof deck and lower roof deck, provide collectors as required for in plane shear and out of plane shear. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S176 S2.09.2 Roof ridge support columns near] 5.5-A4.8 shown on S2.11.2 are not supported by slab below, please check. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Column in question is 20 feet tall, verify HSS5x5 is adequate, per S2.11.2. S178 A2.1 1.1 R, etc. Structural roof plans do not incorporate snow fences shown on architectural drawings. Please provide snow fence with adequate structural connection shear and moment associated with sliding snow. IBC 1608. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. KL&A 8/31/07: COMMENTS ON NEW DETAILS FOLLOW S187 21/S4.03 Minimum depth shall be 48" for frost depth requirement. IBC 1805.2.1. Verify wall vertical rebar is adequately developed at top of footing, ACI 318, 12.2. Appears that variables D and D' are reversed with calculations variables hf and hp, please review. IBC 1806. S188 S5.03 Revised beams 4138 & 4139 appear too shallow to support one way slab at ramp. Shear ties are spaced greater than d/2. Please review beam sizes for ramp loads. IBC 1604.2. Planning Department Conditions- From: Warren Cambell Submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval prior to requesting a TCO. Public Works Conditions- From: Chad Salli, Project Engineer 1. Install snowmelt in loading dock dwy. Sheet M5.15 not in resubmittal package, Sheet M5.14 shows heat in the southern half of the dwy. The dwy should be heated from the back of pan along the Frontage Rd to the trench drain. 2. The fountain entry feature shall not be public right-of-way, please remove from right-of-way. 3. The two tier retaining wall shall be designed/stamped by a Colorado registered professional engineer, greater than 4' in height from the top of wall to the bottom of the foundation. 4. Provide Final Drainage report including hydrology and hydraulic analyses (Box culvert, Storm pipe, inlets, swales, etc...). This shall include storm sewer profiles with HGL shown. A 100 yr analysis shall be completed showing no private/public property damage as a result. Provide capacity analysis for major swales and all inlets. The SCS method may be used for large mountain basins, the Rational method shall be used for the smaller site and developed basins. 5. A Developer Improvement Agreement will be required prior to release of permit. 6. Show proposed location for Comcast fiber line along the west property line. Frontage Road/Vail Road 1. Town of Vail Street lights shall be placed at 50' spacings along the project limits. Coordinate with TOV electricians for electric meter location. Relocate private lighting to private property. 2. Set back (detach) the frontage rd sidewalk 6' from back of curb east of the porte cochere exit. Sod shall be installed between the curb and walk. 3. Use attached sidewalk detail for sidewalks located within the right-of-way. 4. Use TY 13 curb inlets vs TY R where the sidewalk is attached to the curb. 5. If necessary, raise Spraddle Creek vault #I manhole to finished grade. 6. The cross-walk at the roundabout shall be asphalt thru the travel lanes and concrete only across the median. 7. Use CDOT TY 3A curb ramps at the roundabout, 6' width at the throat. 8. Storm line A shall be at 1 % minimum slope. Leaving the existing proposed invert elev at TY R inlet 3 and working upstream at I% appears to still allow for a min of 2' cover at the existing inlet on the north side of the frontage road. 9. Sheet E1.00, please turn off extra curb&gutter alignment. 10. Install 24" conduits to medians for irrigation and 34" conduits to the west median for future use. Spraddle Creek Drainage I . Per previous agreement with the Town, Four-Seasons is responsible for the construction cost of continuing Spraddle Creek to STA 4+40. 2. Install an impermeable membrane around the RCP/CBC due to proposed landscaping and irrigation. 3. Please provide additional detail of proposed walls along the RCP/CBC alignment. Construction of these walls shall be designed so as not to disturb/undermine the RCP/CBC. W Meadow Drive 1. Final approval of the West Meadow Drive construction drawings will be completed in conjunction with the Town of Vail design. Modifications to tie-in grades on the Four Seasons site may be necessary to accommodate this final design. W Meadow plans shall also develop streetscape related items in the right-of-way (street lighting, landscaping, etc). 2. Storm line G alignment needs to be revised. There is not enough room to install between Spraddle Creek and a large tree on the south side of W Meadow that shall be protected. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. 3. Storm line E appears to in conflict with the recently installed water line. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. Landscaping/Irrigation I . Detailed landscaping comments to follow within the next couple of weeks. 2. Coordinate irrigation with TOV irrigation supervisor for final head type/location and water source. 3. The Town is currently in talks with CDOT on permissible landscaping within CDOT right-of-way. Fire Department Conditions- 1. LSR, MOD's and Administrative Modifications must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protection Engineer of record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not accepted. RJA allegedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence has not been presented. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans is not accepted. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additional review. Cond: CONOO10349 Sub-duct system for the dryers and range hoods is not approved. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R090000011 Amount: $1,740.00 01/06/200903:48 PM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: DDG Notation: Layton/Mark Reed - credit card Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 163,192.90 This Payment: $1,740.00 Total ALL Pmts: 163,192.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300, PLAN CK - project GFP012 1,740.00 SAF[bui"Itnc (_-0111 RA G1) Building Department Services Aug. 01, 2008 Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Description: Pool Drawings and adding a hot tub. RE: PROJECT: 4 Seasons PERMIT NUMBER: B06-0196 REVISION NUMBER: 20 INTERNAL REF 8245 ADDRESS: 1 Vail Road Dear Mr. Haeberle: SAFEbuilt Colorado has no input on the storm water connection or the sewer connection outside the building. Vail's Public Works Department has approved the changes. These sheets can be issued to the customer. Plans: Description: Sheets C17 and C20 Plan review fee: 0 No additional square footage- No added valuation , Sincer, John Plano Plans Examiner SAFEbuilt Colorado john.plano a,SAFEbuilt.com John King Building Official SAFEbuilt Colorado john.kingka,SAFEbuilt.com _elofl SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov B06-0196 Rev20 FAL.doc John Plano From: Chad Salli [CSalli@vailgov.com] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 2:59 PM To: John Plano Cc: John King; Martin Haeberle; Tom Kassmel Subject: Re: 4 Season's revisions I am good, I also signed off on sheets C18, 18A 19 which are dated 7/1/08 Chad Salli, P.E. Project Engineer Town of Vail p: 970/479-2169 c: 970/376-2389 f: 970/479-2166 John Plano <JPlano@safebuilt.com> 07/30/2008 2:33 PM Chad, I have revised sheets C17 and C20 date stamped 6/23/08. The application states "revision to storm sewer run" and "sanitary sewer service connection" I don't have any input on these drawings. If you're good with these, could you do an input in Permits+, let me know and I'll issue the sheets. If not, let me know and we can talk. Thanks, John Plano Plans Examiner / Senior Building Inspector SAFEbuilt, Colorado P.O. Box 1618 Eagle, CO 81631-1618 (970)328-1790 (877)428-6412 john.plano@safebuilt.com<mailto:john.plano@safebuilt.com> 1 Revision/information Transmittal All Revision submittals must include the Field Set of approved plans and a copy of the correction letter. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved and the permit is re-issued. Permit #(s) information applies to 0 Attention: Contact Information / c Company: Company Ph: - ax: !~~(~7'/ 4,~-5~x&~ Contact Name: _14_Q'fZ~L~~ l L~ Contact Ph: 066yyL-= Cell: ` 710 4 r L/ E --Mail: L 1:1' 6t;4 -4 Town of Vail Contractor Registration No: X ~ /~A~' Signatu a (required) Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building $ Plumbing $ Electrical $ Mechanical $ Total $ Reason for Revisions (include a list of all changes that have been made from original approval): ~Revisions ( ) Response to Correction Letter ( ) Deferred Submittal u 14 t7 vl~C 6?-zi-ti ' i I (Use additional sheet if necessary) re r-\ LE I Date Received: M D ks-o O JUN 2 3 2008 ~ TOWN OF VAIL S A F b uiltinc. C «I.0'Do Building Department Services January 2~d, 2008 Martin Haeberle 0 Chief Building Official, Town of Vail A`rl 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Description: Revisions to plans, Bulletins 36, 37, 39, 40, 43, 44, 50, 51, 52, 55, 56 RE: PROJECT: 4 Seasons PERMIT NUMBER: B06-0196 REVISION NUMBER: 21 INTERNAL REF 9008 ADDRESS: 1 Vail Road Dear Mr. Haeberle: SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed the documents to review in accordance with the International Codes as adopted by the Town of Vail. Safebuilt Colorado finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction. Bulletin 55 is a generator fueling piping that the Fire Department has comments pending. Bulletin 56 is a deck extension that requires DRB approval. Warren has been notified. When the Town's Departments have approved their review, these two revisions can be issued. Plan review fee: 29 hours=$1740.00 No additional square footage- No added valuation Sincer 1544i- JPlano Plans Examiner SAFEbuilt Colorado john.plano a,SAFEbuilt.com SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office,/ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Page 1 of I Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov B06-0196 Rev21 FAL.doc "A 01-1 4 B IT", ifY Transmittal Form Revision Submittals: 1. "Field Set" of approved plans MUST accompany revisions 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved & the permit is re-issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are $55.00 per hour (2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. Revisions Permit #(s) information applies to: Attention: Response to Correction Letter P"01-04 l06~ attached copy of correction letter J Deferred Submittal to 0 q 6Kt l t Other Project Address: Contact Information t Company: R y s v c { S Company Ph:&50 - ~ t-7 - 0.3G p Fax: Contact Name: J 0~.~ • - S Contact Ph: Cell:g~ 3' y~~ y V~ 7 E-Mail: ~c~Y~ Sal l-{~ST~Ca Lam _ Town of Vail Contractor Registration No: X 0 v.•- 1 Signat re (required) Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building $ Plumbing $ Electrical $ Mechanical $ Fire Sprinkler/Alarm $ Total $ Description / List of Changes: t* O 3Ce 3 ^7 3 y L( <C~ S 1 , Sz < is 5 . Spa E I Div 2 (Use additional sheet if necessary) Date Received: A n i D IE C 1E~lWIE TOWN OF VAIL 11 TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No...: 210107101016 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 07/19/2006 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR LAYTON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC 07/19/2006 9090 S. SANDY PARKWAY SANDY UTAH 84040 License: 333-A APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS 07/19/2006 600 FOSHAY TOWER 821 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 License: 0000001981 Permit # B06-0196 Project PRJ03-0468 Status . . . : ISSUED Applied..: 07/18/2006 Issued . 11/28/2007 Expires. 09/26/2007 Phone: (801) 568-9090 Phone: 612-332-1500 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Occupancy Type NIGHT CLUBS (A2) ZONE 4 IB CHURCHES (A3) ZONE 4 IB BUSINESS(B)& HMP (H5 ZONE 4 IB EDUCATIONAL (E) ZONE 4 IB INDUSTRIAL/MOD HAZ ( ZONE 4 IB MERCANTILE (M) ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/HOTELS ( ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/MULTFAM( ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/MOD HAZ (S1) ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/LOW HAZ(S2) ZONE 4 IB Totals... Factor Sq Feet Valuation 299.08 27,353 $8,180,735.24 369.90 8,605 $3,182,989.50 300.40 31,130 $9,351,452.00 322.53 670 $216,095.10 183.77 29,600 $5,439,592.00 220.56 2,445 $539,269.20 302.22 86,991$26,290,420.02 250.22 133,695$33,453,162.90 169.75 23,080 $3,917,830.00 167.15 75,773$12,665,456.95 399,510$103,237,002.9* TOV Adjusted Valuation: 3,237,002.91 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $237,002.91 FEE SUMMARY Building > 378, 777.45 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 'rota) Calculated Fees 157, 067.90 Plan Check 378, 777.45 Recreation Fee--------------> 399, 510.00 Additional Fees-----------> $4,200.00 Investigation-> 1 $0. 00 TOTAL FEES > 157, 067.90 Total Permit Fee---------- > 161, 267. 90 Will Call-----> $3. 00 Payments > 161, 267. 90 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0. 00 Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e-mailed to applicant. 12/18/2006 cdavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set for plan c by TOV 12/13/06. An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer. 03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR:1215- G&E permit approval only. Conditic 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only 06/12/2007 CDAVIS Action: PA Tower Crane footing pads. No additional fees assessed 07/16/2007 jplano Action: CR Additional work being requested to be adder phasing, correction letter sent. 08/01/2007 jplano Action: CR Second correction letter sent, insuffient supplied. 3) The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design profession architect and/or engineer. The design professionals are to verify that the additi( being requested is not in conflict with the corrections that are requested regard: building permit. All sheets are to be stamped and signed by the associated design professional. The architectural and the plumbing sheets have not been stamped. The stamp on the strl sheets has not been signed. The stamp on the electrical sheets has not been signer 4 There is insufficient detail to approve this submittal. Some examples are: a) There are several sections that are pertinent to this request that are not pro, b) The elevator pit sections 10/S4.04, 18/S4.04, 19/S4.04, 20/S4.04 are missing. c) Ramp transition section 22/S6.01, 6/S6.01, 7/S4.04 are missing d) Exterior foundation wall connection to the matt slab 9/S6.01D, 27/S6.01, 6/S.0_ 7/S6.01 e) Sump pit details 28/S4.04 and 29/S4.04 f) Column schedule, transition of the columns to slab? g) Slab steps 11/S6.01D. This review has stopped because of lack of information. 5 The Public Works Department in Vail has not approved the submittal for additions be added to the phasing. Their approval will be necessary. 08/06/2007 jplano Action: PA Additional work approved for phasing. Under plumbing, underground electrical, rebar and concrete placement for elevator and si APPROVAL FOR MAT SLAB 09/11/2007 jplano Action: AP 10/22/2007 DPLACE Action: PA No charge. 10/22/2007 dplace Action: PA 11/13/2007 ependley Action: AP stamps. No added valuation. 11/15/2007 ependley Action: AP Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 11/30/2007 jplano Action: AP Full permit approved, see conditions REV 4 IR 5881: Approved shop drawings for REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAI REVS/IR6042. Approved shop drawings for de: Rev7/IR6058. Approved RFI-0237, No added vz Rev6/IR6057. Approved RFI-0221, No added vz Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 12/18/2007 JPLANO Action: AP Rev9/IR6236. Approved shop drawings for po: slabs, no added valuation 12/26/2007 jplano Action: AP Rev10/IR6252. Approved changing a post ten: with thickened slab. $120.00 due 12/27/2007 MROYER Action: AP Revll/IR6266,6267. Rebar shop drawings rev: appropiate stamps, no charge 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA REV 12 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER LAYTON ST #05510-004 (EMBEDS @ LEVEL 1, 2, 3 ns 4) FROM JT STEEL NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA EV.13 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER SUBMITTAL (STUD RAILS, LEVELS 4 & 5) FROM SUNCOAST NO ADDTIONAL CHARGE 06/10/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev14,15,16, IR6685,6687,7744 are approved of plan review due, $720.00 07/08/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 19, IR 7989 are approved, Bulletins 10,25,29,31,35,40 - 8 hours of plan review due, $480.00 08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev17, IR 7777 are approved, Bulletins 023 swimming pool revisions, $360 due 08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 20, IR8245 are approved, storm and sew( connetions outside the building, public works has approved it. No charge trom Sat( 09/29/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev18, IR7988 are aproved. The sub-duct sy: dryers and range hoods are not approved. 46 hours of plan review due = $2760.00 Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the He Utility relocation permit request. The applicant shall remove only those trees wh: absolutely necessary for the utility relocation work. 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the al to dewater the site. 03/31/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning recieved a bond to cover the Grad: Excavation in the amount of 3.2 million. Planning has approved the grading and ex( permit. 06/25/2007 Warren Action: COND Planning has approved the tull building pei dated recieved on May 29, 2007, with a single condition. A complete Design Review will need to be submitted for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs the pool deck to West Meadow Drive. 08/20/2007 Warren Action: AP The set of plans provided to allow tro the some work prior to release of a tull building permit has been approved. The plans stamped July 26, 2007 09/05/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning is approving the set of plans dat( 2007, with the condition that the applicant submits a revised landscaping plan toi approval prior to requesting a TCO. 11/02/2007 GRUTHER Action: AP REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAL 06/12/2008 Warren Action: AP The planning departmetn signs ott on Bullei 23A with one condition. The gate on teh new set of stairs shal be as the base of t on the pool deck not on the top of the stairs adjacent to Meadow Drive. 09/26/2008 Warren Action: CR Regarding the above permit my only comment need a detail of the gate at the top of the stairs serving as an exit trom the po( This detail shall be depict the desired gate which tits not only the aesthetics of Season but that of the Meadow Drive streetscape. The design should take into accoi for security trom the public side of the tence and be design with this in mind. F( the Town does not want to see a nice gate submitted, approved, and installed and t of security reason we add a piece of plexi-glass to the gate as an atterthought. are dated 5-8-08 Bullentin #40. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding. Review: Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied: 1. Fire Dept staging on south side of the west end. The hydrant on the west side. Sheet A0.3.00 2. Sheet A0.3.05 does not show an acc, Fire Command Center. 3. The plans submitted by RJA are not 4. The plans show a dead end corridor project is shown on east end. The apporved end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on °ptabie route to the interior of the buiidin< stamped and are labeled "Not for Constructic behind the front desk. 5. 12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is gi Relocate electrical disconnect to site. Location as proposed on pla 03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: 07/11/2007 McGee Action: as submitted 7 11 07. 09/07/2007 McGee Action: the z s u. PA AP AP AP trailer or provide ready access on southwest omitted 12/13/06 is not accepted. g and e permit is approved For G & E only Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3A approved for l: The full permit is approved as noted: Life Safety Report 5 22 07 1. LSR, MOU's, and Admin Mod's must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protect: of Record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not RJA aliedgediy has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence ha: presented. 3. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans, is not accepted. 5. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additionz Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 10/20/2006 is Action: DN Awaiting for additional information 12/20/2006 is Action: PA Approval to allow grading and prep work foi installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for t access for small construction vehicles ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive. 03/26/2007 is Action: PA Staging plan for Phase 1 of the G&E permit only. Engineer approval for the G&E permit still required currently under review. staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only 08/07/2007 csalii Action: AP additional work proposed for phased permit no approval for mat slab 09/13/2007 csalli Action: DN waiting for executed MOU 10/04/2007 TK Action: AP Approved Building Permit with the condtion., the memo dated 8/5/07 from Chad Salli. 07/31/2008 csaiii Action: AP revised sheets C17, C20 dated 7/18/08 and C18A, C19 dated 7/1/08 approved Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOUR~II tv)➢ E BY TELEPHONE AT 479-214 OR T OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. / y l7 SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit # B06-0196 as of 09-29-2008 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS J. BRINK 612-332-1500 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: I VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Conditions Cond: CON0008815 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3/28/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 Applied: 07/18/2006 Issued: 11/28/2007 To Expire: 09/26/2007 The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the full building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original comment number for clarity. General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule" to prevent a room that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor". The Fire and Life Safety Report prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants. These will be required for full permit issuance. General: The Fire & Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved prior to the approval for full building permit. 3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units 3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is discharging. 8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C-414, is actually a horizontal portion of Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or remove the designation of passageway. 10) See the general comment above. 11) See the general comment above. 12) See the general comment above. 13) See the general comment above. 16) See the general comment above. 22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be tested in accordance with ASTME 119, tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire-resistance rating not less than the fire-resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the window when responding for full building permit. 23) See the general comment above. 39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures. Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly. This item has no impact on the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building permit issuance. 42) See response the comment number 39. 46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space is not accessory. 46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 210A as there is no access to stair Q. Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel. 49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved by the Town of Vail's Building Official. 57 through 61 and 149) The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 14 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 17 (BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FRAMING INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED FOR. Cond: 35 (P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: 5 (PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPRINT SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC. Cond: CON0009095 The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review aplication for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs added from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive, within 30 days of the release of the building permit. Cond: CON0009121 The applicant shall submit a seperate Design Review application for review and approval for all signage design, locations, and materials prior to installation. Cond: CON0009294 The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan which addresses the landscaping conflicts created by the shallow soild depths on the culvert containing Spraddle Creek. This plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to requesting a certifcate of occupancy. Cond: CON0009330 SAFEbuilt Colorado Conditions of Approval To: Layton Construction Re: Full Building Permit Conditions of Approval The following conditions will be required to be addressed prior to construction. Sufficient time shall be granted for review, response and approval before work is initiated. Building Department- The items listed within the building department comments are numbered to correspond with the 3 round comment letter dated 08/21/2007. 46. Change the exiting from Vestibule 210A. It appears to exit through intervening room that is not accessory to the vestibule. HGA Response: We submit that the adjacent space is accessory. Vestibule 210A services mechanical rooms and the service elevators. To exit from Vestibule 210A the occupants have to pass through Vestibule 275A, which is basically for the spa staff, then through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area, then to hallway 279, then through exit passageway 293, then through exit passageway 297, then to exit discharge. The issue is that the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area is not accessory to the mechanical rooms. It is accessory for the rooms off Vestibule 275A for the staff of the spa but not the mechanical areas. Please change the layout accordingly. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Vestibule 210A is purely circulation space and does not carry an occupant load. This vestibule provides connection between the Spa and the service elevators, IDF Room 210, and Mechanical Room 257. Relative to egress, it provides the egress route for the one occupant from IDF 210 and the one occupant from Mechanical 257 (as shown on A0.3.02). IDF 210, Mechanical 257, Vestibule 210A, and Service Elevator Lobby E-202 are considered to be part of the overall Spa as they serve Spa functions. The service elevators stop at this location solely to provide connection to the Spa. IDF 210 houses audio-visual, telephone, and data system equipment that specifically serves the Spa and must be accessed by Spa personnel. Similarly, Mechanical 257 houses the equipment serving the pools within Room 255 and must be accessed by Spa staff. In summary, we submit that all these spaces are part of the overall Spa and are "accessory" to each other. Therefore, current layout provides egress that complies with IBC 1013.2 as the spaces are accessory, are not hazard occupancies, and provide a discernible path of travel to an exit. This comment is in reference to the electrical room #212. Please revise 64. A2.03.1 - Wall tag both shafts located in room 304 (storage room). Wall tags must reference an approved assembly from the partition schedule. HGA Response: Wall tag has been added. One shaft in room 304 does not have wall tags. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The drawing has been updated to include wall tags for this shaft. Still have one shaft not tagged Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. 152. Provide accessible parking spaces per IBC Table 1106.1. Providing 212 spaces would require 7 to be accessible, 2 of those to be van accessible. Verify 98" of vertical clearance for the van spots. HGA Response: We submit that the number of accessible parking stalls complies with IBC Table 1106.1 and section 1106.5. The hotel is operating on 100% valet parking stalls, with an additional 59 self-park stalls for fractional ownership, full ownership, and employee. Per Table 1106.1, 3 stalls are required for the self-parking, and at least one of the three is required to be van accessible. Plan sheet A0.3.01 indicates there are 228 parking spaces. Spaces marked for Valet parking number 78. With those counts, Table 1 106.1.3 would require 5 accessible spaces with one van accessible space. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Per previous response, most of the parking spaces are valet only. There are 59 self-park stalls that will be allocated to fractional ownership, full ownership condos, and employees. The drawings have been updated to identify each space as either valet or self-park. We submit that only the 59 self-park stalls are considered per Table 1106.1 and that the number of accessible spaces required are provided. Deducting the 78 Valet parking from the total spaces, you are still required to add two additional accessible spaces for a total number of 5 accessible spaces. 155. All the massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. Please amend the toilet facilities, changing rooms, lavatories, tubs and the showers meet to accessibility requirements of the ANSI A117.1-98. (IBC 1109.14.3) HGA Response: We submit the Wet Massage Suite #289 complies with the accessibility requirements of ANSI A117.1-98 (IBC 1109.14.3). All massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We disagree that IBC 1109.14.3 requires that ALL spa treatment rooms be accessible. IBC 1109.14 pertains to "recreational facilities". If the Spa is going to be considered a "recreational facility" then it should be considered as a whole. As such, the Spa is accessible - it provides accessibility at the entry/reception, locker rooms, toilets, showers, whirlpools, lounges, treatment rooms, etc. We submit that nothing requires ALL treatment rooms to be accessible any more than ALL lockers, ALL toilets, or ALL showers. Add grab bars at the tub in room 289 for accessibility. 167. We are unable to locate a designated accessible Type "A" condominium per Section 1107.6.2 of the 2003 IBC. As the condominiums are a different type of R-2 occupancy from the time-share units, an accessible Type "A" condominium is required. HGA Response: Since only 16 condominiums are proposed, no Type "A" units are required. Refer to IBC 1107.6.2.1.1. With the condominiums, employee housing and timeshare units there are a total of 63 units classified as an R-2 occupancy group. Per Section 1107.6.2.1.1 Type A units shall be dispersed among the various classes of units. Therefore a Type A accessible unit is required in each of the following groups: the condominiums, the employee housing, and the timeshare units. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): To resolve this issue we have revised Condo #8 (on Level 9, sheet A4.28.1)) to be a "Type A" unit per ICC/ANSI A 117.1. Two accessible employee housing units and one accessible timeshare unit are already provided and indicated on the drawings. Comment 169-180 - Submit a Memorandum of Understanding to the Town of Vail for approval by the Building Official to reference the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1. If accepted by the town, please revise entire plan to comply with the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1 in its entirety. If not accepted please revise plans per 1998 ANSI A-117.1 and comments above. 169. In the accessible units in the guest rooms of the R-1 occupancy, all bathing & toilet facilities are required to be accessible per Chapter 6 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: We submit that the accessible units include the accessible bathing and toilet facilities and comply with Chapter 6 of ANSI A] 17. 1. Plan sheet A4.07.1 A and A4.07.1 B for Unit PR-HC shows a raised platform in media room # 116 which does not have an accessible route. Also, bathrooms/rooms # 103, # 108, 4109, # 110, # 133 do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The raised platform within Media 116 is intended to provide tiered seating within this "home theater". We submit that an accessible route is not required for this small platform as it is less than 25% of the overall room and the remainder of the room is accessible. While this room is not an "assembly" space, we submit that IBC 1108.2.4.1, exception 2 provides guidance regarding this room. See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.06.1 for Unit 2KK-HC has bathrooms/rooms #103, #108 which do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.05.3 for Unit 1 K-HC has bathroom # 103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.04AA for Unit ES2-HC has bathroom # 103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.01.1 for Unit K I -H 1 has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Unit type K1-HI is a unit for the hearing impaired. It is not an accessible unit. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We submit that only one accessible bathroom is required within an accessible hotel unit. This requirement is consistent with the federal standard - ADAAG Chapter 9. To interpret IBC Chapter 11 as requiring that ALL bathrooms must be accessible is to raise the standard beyond the federal requirements. We submit that this is not reasonable, does not reflect industry standard, and is not the intent of the IBC / ICC. Rather, we submit that the IBC / ICC intends to coordinate and correlate with the federal standards. As an example, we can examine the accessibility requirements for condominiums. The federal standard is the FHA Fair Housing Design Manual. This document allows condo units to be provided with one "Specification B" bathroom and that is the highest level of accessibility. Similarly, the 2003 edition of ICC / ANSI A 117.1 has been revised to better correlate to FHA and require that "Type A" units provide "at least one" accessible bathroom . The common thread is the requirement is for one or "at least one" accessible bathroom - not all. Since the ADAAG, FHA Design Manual, and A 117 (2003) all require one or "at least one" accessible bathroom it is reasonable to interpret the IBC's requirements in the same manner. Otherwise, all the hotel units would be held to a higher standard than the condominium units within the same building. 170. In Type "A" dwelling units of the R-2 occupancies, all toilet and bathing facilities must comply with Sections 1002.1 1.1 through 1002.11.7 of ANSI A117.1. Some Type "A" dwelling units have bathrooms which do not comply. Please clarify. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We request that ICC/ANSI A117.1 - 2003 be used as the applicable edition relative to the "Type A" condominium. This is the most recent version of Al 17 and our research has found that the various revisions in Chapter 10 were intended to correct the intent of various provisions and to better coordinate with federal requirements (FHA and ADA). Per 1003.1 1.1 of the A 117-2003, at least one bathroom is required to comply with 1003.11. This correlates with FHA requirements ("Specification B" bathrooms) and Chapter 9 of the ADA. Therefore, we submit that the latest intent of the various codes and standards is that at least one bathroom, but not all, is required to comply with 1003.11. 171. In Type "A" dwelling units, a permanent seat is required at the head end of the bathtub per Section 607 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): ICC/ANSI Al 17.1 - 1998, 607.3 states that a permanent seat OR a removable in-tub seat shall be provided. However, 1002.11.6, exception 1, states that the removable in-tub seat required by 607.3 is NOT required. Since 607.3 gives the option of either permanent or removable seats, we submit that the true intent of 1002.11.6, exception 1 is to NOT require either type of seat. ICC / ANSI A117.1 - 2003 carries similar language, but also includes Figure 1003.11.8 (a) to clarify that the seat (permanent or removable) can be omitted. 172. In Type "A" dwelling units, clearance in front of bathtubs shall extend the length of the bathtub and shall be 30 inches wide minimum per Section 607 of ANSI A117.1. Some of the bathtubs have lavatories encroaching into the required clearances. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required bathtub clear floor area is indicated. 173. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.11.1 of ANSI A 117. 1, doors shall not swing into the clear floor or ground space or clearance for any fixture, unless a clear floor space of 30 inches minimum by 48 inches minimum is located beyond the arc of the door swing. There are water closet compartments and some other bathroom areas that do not meet those requirements. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. The door swings do not swing into the other clear floor spaces. 174. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.13 of ANSI A117.1, where operable windows are provided, at least one window in each sleeping, living, or dining space shall have operable parts complying with Section 1002.13 of ANSI A117. 1. All windows of "accessible units" shall comply with Section 309 of ANSI A117.1, Operable Parts. Provide documentation showing compliance. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment 4167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. A note has been added to indicate requirement that all operable windows (and sliding doors) comply with 1002.13. 175. For Type "A" and "accessible units", provide details showing accessibility compliance for the operable parts of the showers, lavatory height, lavatory knee and toe clearance, and bathroom mirror height per Section 1002.11 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to interior elevations shown within the Interior Design drawings. I am unable to locate the Interior Design Drawings in the plan set submitted. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to accessibility details illustrated on sheet A0.4.3. 180. For Type "A" dwelling units, provide details showing accessibility compliance for kitchen work surfaces, sinks, range controls, and refrigerator/freezer requirements per Section 1002.12 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required kitchen features are illustrated. 183. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the condominiums, some "U" shaped kitchens do not have the required 60 inch minimum clearance between opposing base cabinets per Section 1003.12 of ANSI A117.L HGA Response: Sheets A4.22.1, A4.25.1, and A4.30.1 have been revised to provide 60" clearance at U-shaped kitchens. Provide corrected plan sheets. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These sheets are included in the 7/18/07 resubmittal set. 185. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the time share units, the water closets do not have required clearances and some doors encroach required clearances per Section 1003.11.2 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Refer to the response to comment # 186 below. As such, there are no Type "B" timeshare units. See response to comment # 186. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to response to comment # 186. 186. Is Option "A" being used for the bathroom fixtures in the Type "B", Time-share units? If so, each fixture is required to meet the requirements of the option per Section 1003.11.3.1 of ANSI A] 17.1. Please clarify. HGA Response: As previously discussed and resolved, the timeshare units are transient occupancy (similar to hotel units) and not residences. As such, one accessible timeshare unit is provided per IBC Table 1107.6. 1. 1. This accessible unit is #3103 located on Level 03. The enlarged plan for this accessible unit is on sheet A4.12.1 A and the associated H/C bathroom in 2/A4.12.2A. Provide signed letters from persons representing the operating authority for this facility stating that the timeshare units will not be used as residences. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These letters will be submitted by ownership 203. Enclose both mechanical rooms on the 9th level in 2 hour rated construction, it appears that the 2 hour shafts from below terminate in these rooms. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet M4.06 (Part Plan Attachment No. M06). The Area 3A mechanical room is unrated, and the 2 hour rated vertical risers through the building through the 8th floor slab. In order to avoid the installation of inaccessible fire dampers at the top of the riser, RYBKA have revised sheet M4.06 to ductwork is to be fire rated in the attic space. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. The Area 3B mechanical room is a 2 hour rated room that ends at column line A] 4. The ductwork that extends to the south across column line A 14 is 2 hour fire rated to avoid the installation of fire dampers in inaccessible locations. Fire dampers are shown in the penetrations of the two hour rated Area 3B mechanical room, where ductwork exist the mechanical room. A) The mechanical room on the 9th level over "AREA-03A"has not been addressed on the plan sheets. The partial ninth floor plan on 8 x 1 1 " indicate wrapping ducts. If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. Ductwork is to be wrapped to provide 2 hour fire rating in attic space. (Refer to Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03). Provide architectural details rated enclosure. B) In the mechanical room labeled 911 the rated walls do not appear to enclose the room entirely. The wall is labeled 30 minutes on the north end and the wall is labeled 1 hour where Trash 912 (above "AREA-0313") is located on sheet A0.3.09. There are 3 duct penetrations in this area to be addressed, 28x10 S/E F/B, 24x18 G/e F/B and 24x14 S/A F/A T/B. Rybka Response: Refer to Architectural Sheet A0.3.09 where Mechanical Room 911 is to be provided with 2 hour rating. Three ducts identified enter riser shaft from Mechanical Room 911 and riser is considered to be connected to and form part of mechanical room and so no fire smoke damper is provided. The ducts in question enter a shaft in the floor below within Maid Room G-711. Fire/Smoke Dampers are required where these ducts enter the shaft. One duct is not in a shaft. Please address accordingly. C) How will the 2 hour shaft assembly be maintained at EF-14 and EF-30? If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be rated for operation within rated enclosures by fan manufacturer or are to be relocated within Mechanical Room 911. Provide architectural details for the shafts. 214. Add a fire/smoke damper to the penetration by the 8x6 duct that penetrates the 30 minute fire partition on page M2.08.1 on grid line 11 and between A9 and A10. Rybka Response: Fire dampers are not required in one hour rated fire barriers per IMC 607.5.2. (Refer to Response No. 208.) This is not a fire barrier; it is a fire partition defining a rated corridor. A fire/smoke damper is required for this duct. Rybka Response: Combination fire smoke damper is provided where this duct exits the rated shaft. The response indicates an f/s damper has been added to the duct as exits the rated shaft. A smoke damper is required where it penetrates the rated corridor. 215. Fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Rybka Response: Mechanical floor plan sheets, sheets M2.01.1 thru M2.11.1 have been revised to show: Combination fire smoke dampers (FSD) or shunt duct" on rated shaft penetrations. FD in duct floor penetrations when no more than three floors are penetrated, and " FD on 2 hour rated wall penetrations. * shunt ducts per NFPA 90A (2002), Figure A.5.3. NFPA 90A is not an adopted document by the Town of Vail or referenced in the IMC. The review team is not familiar with the term "shunt duct". Fire smoke dampers are required at the shaft and corridor duct penetrations. (IMC 607.5.3, 607.5.4 and 607.5.5.1) Rybka Response: The 2006 IMC now calls the use of 22" upturned sheet metal ducts in 2 hour fire rated risers as 'sub ducts'. The provision of the 'sub duct' is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. The use of sub ducts on the project is shown in Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03. M2.03.1 - Remove designations for shunt ducts for the ducts run in the garage exhaust shaft. Rybka Response: EF-8, EF-43 and residential dryer exhaust have been shown terminating in a vertical areaway (garage exhaust riser) that is always being exhausted by EF-1 B on emergency power. It was agreed during the June TOV plan review meeting that this condition is analogous to the 'sub duct' provisions identified earlier. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 2. In Group B and R occupancies equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 of the International Building Code, smoke dampers are not required at penetrations of shafts where kitchen, clothes, dryer, bathroom and toilet room exhaust openings with steel exhaust subducts, having a wall thickness of at least 0.019 inch (0.48 mm) extend at least 22 inches (559 mm) vertically and the exhaust fan at the upper terminus is powered continuously in accordance with the provisions of Section 909.11 of the International Building Code, and maintains airflow upward to the outdoors. The drawings are still substantially incomplete when labeling FSD's. I will attempt to identify some locations. It will be up to the design team to identify all locations. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts exit rated shafts. All drawings are indicting F.D. on the bathroom exhausts where penetrating the shaft. There is an administrative modification request to eliminate dampers on the bathroom exhausts. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FD designations at restroom exhausts have been deleted where 'sub-ducts' are provided per the administrative modification. The drawings are indicating ducts from below and ducts from above. Please create a tag for sub-ducts and clearly mark the plans on all the ducts that are to be utilizing this system. M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-301 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 2-8x6 ducts and 1-10x6 duct. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-311 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 1-8x10 duct and 1-I2x6. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-301 and C-311 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - All duct penetrations through the shafts are marked F.D. These are required to be FSD. There are too many to list individually. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts penetrate rated shafts. There are multiple places that indicate FSD's where an administrative modification has been requested to utilize a 22" sub-duct. Please coordinate. M2.04.1 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-401 and C-411 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.04.1 - There is a 14x10 duct supplying corridor C-411 missing a damper designation. The duct is near A9.9 and 11/11.4. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. This duct has changed size to 12x8 since last review. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) These are just a few of the un-complying damper designations, stopped review on this correction. Again, fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Reconfiguration is still necessary. 216. Ductwork, pipes and electrical are prohibited in an exit passageways unless serving the exit passageway. It appears that above non-rated ceilings in the exit passageways the space is being used as a plenum and contains construction elements not allowed, please address all exit passageways. Rybka Response: Mechanical services not associated with exit passageways have been relocated. The review team's interpretation of IBC 1020.5 is that any ductwork serving an exit passageway shall be a completely separate system from the rest of the building and separate from all other passageways. Also, this system is required for pressurization. 1020.5 Penetrations. Penetrations into and openings through an exit passageway are prohibited except for required exit doors, equipment and ductwork necessary for independent pressurization, sprinkler piping, standpipes, electrical raceway for fire department communication and electrical raceway serving the exit passageway and terminating at a steel box not exceeding 16 square inches (0.010 m2). Such penetrations shall be protected in accordance with Section 712. There shall be no penetrations or communicating openings, whether protected or not, between adjacent exit passageways. Rybka Response: It is our understanding that only portions of the building service systems that serve the exit enclosure are allowed to penetrate the exit enclosure. We note that IBC 1019.1.3, VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURE, VENTILATION, Item .2 permits HVAC equipment (FCUs) to be located in the exit enclosure: 10 19.1.3 Ventilation. Equipment and ductwork for exit enclosure ventilation shall ....where located within the building, be separated from the remainder of the building, including other mechanical equipment, with construction as required for shafts. All ductwork serving the exit passageways shall be protected at the point of penetration of the passageway with a fire/smoke damper. The passageway is an extension of the vertical exit enclosure that it serves and lesser protection is not allowed. (1017.1) Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, and have provided FSD where make-up air ductwork penetrates the exit enclosure. M2.03.1- There is a duct termination shown in Stair Q exit enclosure, labeled "16x12 Employee Dryer T/A". This is not allowed in an exit enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been revised to show routing of dryer exhaust so that it does not pass through Stair Q. M2.04.1 - There is an 8x6 duct penetration within the exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.04.1 - There is a transfer opening 24x4 within exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization; this transfer opening is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.05.3 - There is a 6" duct shown penetrating Stair N exit enclosure. Please move out of the enclosure. (IBC 1019.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.05.3 has been revised and ductwork has been rerouted so as not to pass through Stair N. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-601 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the elevator lobby and maid's room. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-601. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 3.3/4 and A11. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - There is a duct penetration between Exit Passageway C-601 and Stair S-601. Penetrations are not allowed. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-611 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-611 is not deliberate and is to be deleted. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 and a 12x6 duct passing through Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. Grid lines 11/11.4 and A8.2/A9.9. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There is a 20x10 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-61 1. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 133/134.3 and BC/BD. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.2 - There is a 12x10 duct penetrating the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that Stair S-605 is connected to exit passageway C-614. and that the 'unlabeled passageway' is rated 2 hours, this upper level of the hallway is rated to provide separation between levels 4 and 5 and this portion of the ceiling space does connect to a rated vertical exit enclosure, the hallway is not an exit passageway, and that 1020.5 does not apply. M2.06.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: See previous comment. M2.07.2 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-717 are not intended to function as returns, are to be shown 'blanked-off and are provided for aesthetic reasons only. M2.07.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.3 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.08.1 and M2.08.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-803. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. Penetrations are not allowed fire wrapped or not. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. These comments are still outstanding. Tim Willings P.E. with Rybka met with the plans examiner on 8/14/07 to bring updated drawings addressing these corrections. It was advised to submit the drawings when all other comments are addressed. 222. Please address the garage exhaust on the east side of the structure that will cause a nuisance thru the casement windows (W 102) in rooms 5318, 6318 and 7318. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet A2.05.2 for plan location, and sheet A0.7.2 (W 102) for window type. Architect to revise window to be fixed type. HGA Response: The architectural documents have been revised to provide fixed windows at these three locations. The architectural drawings are indicating windows W 102. This window is casement not fixed on sheet A0.7.2. Please coordinate. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Revised drawings indicating fixed windows at these locations are included with this resubmittal. Since this review, the Town of Vail has informed our review team that garage exhausts on the CO2 detectors are product-conveying outlets requiring being 10' above grade, 10' from openings into the building and 10' from property lines. The continuous fan is considered environmental, thus allowing T from openings and 3' from property lines. Please address accordingly. 224. Please indicate how the 18" flue from the gas ironer, on the 3rd level is routed thru the loading dock above on the 4th level. Rybka Response: Laundry gas-fired flat ironer vent leaves the laundry room at level 3 (Sheet M2.03.1) and runs vertically through the building in a rated chase with fire enclosed offsets before being vented at the roof of level 11 (Sheet M2.11.1). M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Provide architectural details for the shaft. 228. Specify on the plans the location of EC-1, Type I fan for the kitchen. Rybka Response: Sheet M4.04 has been revised to show Ecology Unit EC-1 in Ecology Room M-402A. Ecology Room M-402A as designed is a component of the grease duct enclosure. "The duct enclosure shall serve a single grease exhaust duct system and shall not contain any other ducts, piping, wiring or systems." Remove the other exhaust fans, ducting and electrical within the room not associated with the Type 1 duct. (IMC 506.3. 10) Rybka Response: The 2 hour rated architectural enclosure of the Ecology unit has been reconfigured to that only the ductwork and equipment associated with the commercial kitchen exhaust is contained within the Ecology Room M-402A. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour wall and 90 minute door that is shown on the mechanical drawings. 233. Indicate on the plans that the 36" dryer duct and the 18" flue from the Ironer are in a 2 hour shaft on the 6th level, page M2.06.1. Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, the 36" dryer exhaust duct and 18" gas-fired flat ironer vent that both run horizontally at level 6 (on sheet M2.06. I) are to be in a 2-hr fire rated enclosure. M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. (from comment 224) Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour shaft walls and details for construction. Please show compliance to IBC 707.11 for the bottom of the shaft housing the 34" dryer duct. 234. Provide manufacturers instructions to verify the dryers in rooms 312 and 31 OD are capable of exhausting the developed length shown on the plans. Rybka Response: Residential dryer exhaust system shown on Sheet M2.03.1 serving Employee Laundry Room 31 OD and Valet Room 317, with quantity five (4+1) dryer exhaust connections to dryer exhaust EF-43 has been rerouted. In addition to the lint filter integral to the appliance, and auxiliary lint trap and cleanout has been shown on the common dryer exhaust duct system before the duct leaves the Employee Laundry Room 31 OD. The entire length of the residential dryer exhaust duct is to be fire wrapped to maintain clearances to combustibles. Discharge of laundry dryer exhaust is routed to exterior via connection to rated garage exhaust riser. Penetration is protected by fire wrap and minimum 22" shunt duct extended into garage exhaust riser. In addition, RYBKA have specified a laundry exhaust booster fan EF-43 which is interlocked with dryer operation. Dryer exhaust ducts are required to terminate to the outside the building and shall be equipped with a back draft damper, also clothes dryer exhaust ducts shall not extend into or through ducts or plenums. Route the dryer ducts directly to the exterior with a back draft damper. (IMC 504.4) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by showing the backdraft damper. The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 238. The Laundry Layout, page LA1.2, indicates a flue pipe for the dry cleaner in room #317. Add the flue and the 2 hour chase to the architectural sheets and to the mechanical sheets, clarify that it does not pass through a plenum. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.03.1 to show dry cleaning machine exhaust fan EF-8 and ducted connection to outdoors. M2.03.1 - The termination is shown with a 22" sub-duct within the garage exhaust duct. This is not to the exterior as required per IMC 502.7.3.6. The review team also is concerned that when the garage exhaust is not operating the fumes from the dry cleaning can migrate to the garage. Terminate the dry cleaning exhaust to the exterior. Rybka Response: The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 244. Add a 2 hour shaft below and proper opening protection for the duct designated as 24x14 S/A F/A-24x12 S/A T/B on page M2.08.1 on grid line l0A and between 10.5/11. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1 and relocated the duct riser to the protected shaft in the North West corner of the Maids Room G-811. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by properly coordinating the duct offset/riser transfer shown at this level with rated shaft location or rating requirements. These two ducts that transition between shafts that are not aligned between the 8th and 9th floor levels are both to be shown enclosed in a 2 hour rated drywall enclosure, negating the need for combination fire smoke dampers, except where duct connections penetrate the shaft wall (one location). The duct on this level is indicating 24x14 S/A(supply air) F/A(from above). The 9th floor level or the enlarged M4.06 does not show this duct. Please clarify. 245. Add a 2 hour shaft or designate a fire damper for the 28x10 and the 28x14 as it passes through a 2 hour floor/ceiling assembly into the mechanical room above. On page M2.08.1 between grid lines 10.5 /11 and A8.2/A9.9. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that ducts that rise vertically through the building that are protected with two hour fire rated enclosures and are connected to a 2 hour rated mechanical room at the highest level do not have a fire damper at the floor penetration of the mechanical room. Rybka submits that the 2 hour rated shaft enclosure is an extension of the 2 hour rating of the mechanical room fire rated enclosure. There is a 24x10 duct shown penetrating the shaft connecting to the 28x10 duct within the shaft. Add the S/F damper at this location. (The architectural overlays indicate a shaft too small to house the duct?) There is a 24x18 duct shown in this vicinity penetrating the floor/ceiling above. Please address with a fire damper. 246. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 8x10 duct on page M2.07.2 between grid lines A8.2/A9.9 and 10/10.5. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1. The duct has not been addressed on all levels also see comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by coordinating the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7, 8, 9 and 10 and attic levels (Sheets M2.07.2, M2.08.2, M2.09.2, M2.10.2 and M2.11.1). Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft wall (one location each occupied floor). The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands, the duct in question has been changed to 12x18 on the 7th level. 247. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 12x6 duct on page M2.07.1 between grid lines A6/A7 and on grid line 4.2. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1, M2.08.1, M209.1. This duct serving the elevator lobbies has not been addressed. Rybka Response: Rybka will coordinate the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7 in this location with level above and below. Rybka will correct this by rerouting existing ductwork through rated risers provided by HGA in these locations and Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft . The same issue as response to #246. The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands. The supply duct from level 11 to 10 has no shaft, the duct runs horizontally on the 9th level with no shaft and runs to the 7th level with fire dampers at the floors of the 8th and 9th. This duct requires a shaft. 264. Fire dampers and rated shafts for ductwork through floor/ceiling assemblies are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Refer to response to comment 215 Here are some floor penetrations by ducts that have not been addressed, please evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. M2.03.1 - 12x20 duct, grid lines A4.6 and 2.7/3 The duct in question has changed to 20x16. The vertical and horizontal shafts need to be shown on the architectural sheets. M2.03.1 - 18x14 duct, grid lines A12 and 3.3/4 The horizontal shaft shown on M2.02.1 is not shown on the architectural sheets. M2.04.1 - 16x10 duct, grid lines A13 and 3.3/4 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.04 - 12x6 duct, grid lines A 10/A 1 1 and 10.5/11 A fire damper has been added to the 2 floors above. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. M2.04 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A 10/A 11 and 10.5111 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. The duct is connecting more than 2 stories below the shaft. M2.04 - 6x12 duct, grid lines A10 and 10.5 The drawings have been changed to add fire dampers at the floor line. This duct connects more than 2 stories, a shaft is required. M2.05 - 26x14 R/A, grid lines A6/A7 and 5 A fire damper is required at the floor between the 5th and 6th level. M2.05 - 12x12 paint shop exhaust, 12x12 carpenter exhaust and a 24x12 sanitary duct, grid lines A4.6 and 4/5. These ducts traverse from what appears to be a rated shaft from below through the Resid. Club Concierge Desk (512) room up through the ceiling with no protection. This duct enters a shaft on this level, add a fire damper to the duct as it enters the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.05 - 6x6, 8x6, (2)12x6 and IOx20 ducts, grid lines A10 and 10110.5 M2.05 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10 and 10.5/11 Review on duct penetrations through the floors has been stopped. The plans examiner's function is not to make a punch list for the design team. Evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that fire dampers, rated shafts and combination fire smoke dampers have been added to the floor plans in general conformance with requirements of the plan reviewer. Additional damper, combination fir dampers and shaft wall construction will be required where this drawing revision has not correctly identified that they are required. Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. Structural Conditions- The conditions listed are taken from the last comment letter dated 07/18/2007. The open issues are listed in Red. S106 F 9,11,14/S6.01 E Sheet S2.03.2: 12 ft. cantilever retaining wall extension of exterior two span wall below, outside of ballroom areaway on line A 1 I between 14 and 14.5 has not been checked and appears to be overstressed for flexure, please check. Consider moment resisting joints at slab to wall connections. Design / detail planter wall. These details require rebar and splices to be shown for proper detailing and construction. Verify cantilever deflection. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S110 F S2.02.4 No calculations have been provided for the cantilevered retaining wall around the pool structure, or on gridline D1. Verify lateral load capacity, consider pedestrian surcharge and water surcharge due to site drains behind this wall as appropriate. Verify footing width. KL&A 6/26/07: Wall in question between gridlines 6-8.5 south of A] 8 supports roof loads and also is the lateral load path for pool structure loading, and for roof uplift for partially enclosed structures. Wall also is monolithic with Area 3A perimeter building wall. Design is part of EOR's scope, please provide wall designs accounting for support of roof structure. KL&A 8/31/07: Coordinate new retaining wall detail 21/S4.03 with foundations shown on plan, S2.02.4. Verify new steel roof around pool structure will resist lateral soil reaction of 1.0 klf, verify metal deck shear strength and connection to resisting perpendicular retaining walls. S128 GS S2.09.3 Top slab bars l OT3 & l OT6 are shown at line 10.6/A 14. It seems these bars are shown in error as the concrete beam is upturned at this location. Beams south of line A] 2.2 are not identified. Please check. IBC 1603.1. KL&A 6/26/07: Top bars also appear required at gridline A10. S2.09.3 PT profile is incomplete, details are required. KL&A 8/31/07: Top bars are still not shown on plan, please review. 5145 LS 1/S3.02C Wall thickness is shown as 8 inches. Plan S201.2 indicates a 12" exterior foundation wall, please coordinate. KL&A 6/26/07: Coordinate reinforcing shown on shear wall elevation with 'W2'or'W3' per S2.01.2, it is unclear which wall type controls for soil lateral loading. Wall must span two way due to stair shaft opening, verify designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S164 LS S2.11 Provide detail of roof diaphragm to concrete cores. Provide or indicate detail of steel beams to concrete cores for gravity plus lateral loading, per ASCE 7-02 load combinations. Verify drag loads and chord force detailing at eave framing. Verify diaphragm welding is sufficient for expected shear forces, provide shear and moment diagram at roof deck levels. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7. KL&A 6/26/07: New detail 13/S1.0.5B:Welded studs, thickness and dimensions of embed plate are not defined. Please provide this information for all beams and reaction conditions on the drawings. Verify connection is adequate with short slot or long slot holes in the shear tab, if permitted for erection. Provide roof diaphragm calculations per original comment. IBC 1911, 1912, 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S165 LS S2.11 Provide detail of concrete diaphragm to concrete cores, verify shear transfer at each level and comment whether any drags are required. Verify if typical details 12 & 23/S1.0.3A apply throughout the job. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S169 LS 53.02A Calculations show a significant force reversal / back-stay effect from Level 6 to Level 5 shear force, i.e. SW 14 & SW 16. Verify this load path has been designed for the loads per 3D analysis. Verify soil plus wind / seismic loading has been used for drag design. Note per plan, S2.05.1, a large hole exists adjacent to wall SW 16, and per calculations page 536, (38+57)=95k shear transfer is required. No drags are shown on plan. Please verify. Note, elevations S3.02A show #5 @ 14" o.c. at upper levels, calculations shown (2) #5 @ 24" o.c., please verify designs match calculations. IBC 1616.1.1, IBC 1604.4. KL&A 6/26/07: Original comment calculated (38+57)=95k load for SW14 not SW16 as noted, however collector bars have not been added for SW 14. SW 16 collector load is (86+143)=229k, (4) #7 shown on plan are not adequate for 229k, please review all collector designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S171 52.11.1-2, etc. Roof framing plans are incomplete. Please address the following and confirm detailing will be provided in future drawings issues, per IBC 1604.2, 2205.1. a) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed b) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed c) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed d) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed e) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed f) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed g) W8 & W 16 eave supports do not cantilever outwards and support eave in RAM analysis submitted, instead all load is transferred directly to columns via eave rim beam. Verify eave supports and perimeter girders are adequately sized KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. h) 52.09.3, etc: HSS6x6 to W8, W 14 moment connection at eave needs a detail KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. i) 1 /S2.10.3: W 16x31 on line A 10.5 is shown as W 18x35 per calculations, please verify all beams match calculations. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S172 I /S2.08.3 W 18x46 eave support girder near gridlines CB-C 1 is shown as W21 x44 per calculations; W1400 on line BE is shown as W21x48 per calculations. Several cantilevered eave moment connection supports are shown without a backspan member. Please review. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 1/52.08.3 Verify lateral support of the low roof structure for wind and seismic loading; low roof section is not connected to Level 8 PT slab beyond or core walls within the roof area, and braced frames are not shown. Similar at 2/S2.08.3 and other low roof structures. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. 5173 11,26,28/S7.0] A Calculations indicate that roof deck is attached to slab edge along line 2 and other locations where deck and floor slab are near the same elevation. Provide a detail for lateral roof to slab connection where required by lateral analysis. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S174 S2.11.1, etc Show roof diaphragm to concrete core connection, consider in-plane collector shear forces and out of plane anchorage forces. IBC 1604.8.2; ASCE 7, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S175 S2.11.1 Verify diaphragm continuity at dormers line A5 between upper roof deck and lower roof deck, provide collectors as required for in plane shear and out of plane shear. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S176 52.09.2 Roof ridge support columns near 15.5-A4.8 shown on S2.11.2 are not supported by slab below, please check. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Column in question is 20 feet tall, verify HSS5x5 is adequate, per S2.11.2. S178 A2.11.1 R, etc. Structural roof plans do not incorporate snow fences shown on architectural drawings. Please provide snow fence with adequate structural connection shear and moment associated with sliding snow. IBC 1608. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. KL&A 8/31/07: COMMENTS ON NEW DETAILS FOLLOW S187 21/S4.03 Minimum depth shall be 48" for frost depth requirement. IBC 1805.2.1. Verify wall vertical rebar is adequately developed at top of footing, ACI 318, 12.2. Appears that variables D and D' are reversed with calculations variables hf and hp, please review. IBC 1806. S188 S5.03 Revised beams 4138 & 4139 appear too shallow to support one way slab at ramp. Shear ties are spaced greater than d/2. Please review beam sizes for ramp loads. IBC 1604.2. Planning Department Conditions- From: Warren Cambell Submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval prior to requesting a TCO. Public Works Conditions- From: Chad Salli, Project Engineer 1. Install snowmelt in loading dock dwy. Sheet M5.15 not in resubmittal package, Sheet M5.14 shows heat in the southern half of the dwy. The dwy should be heated from the back of pan along the Frontage Rd to the trench drain. 2. The fountain entry feature shall not be public right-of-way, please remove from right-of-way. 3. The two tier retaining wall shall be designed/stamped by a Colorado registered professional engineer, greater than 4' in height from the top of wall to the bottom of the foundation. 4. Provide Final Drainage report including hydrology and hydraulic analyses (Box culvert, Storm pipe, inlets, swales, etc...). This shall include storm sewer profiles with HGL shown. A 100 yr analysis shall be completed showing no private/public property damage as a result. Provide capacity analysis for major swales and all inlets. The SCS method may be used for large mountain basins, the Rational method shall be used for the smaller site and developed basins. 5. A Developer Improvement Agreement will be required prior to release of permit. 6. Show proposed location for Comcast fiber line along the west property line. Frontage Road/Vail Road 1. Town of Vail Street lights shall be placed at 50' spacings along the project limits. Coordinate with TOV electricians for electric meter location. Relocate private lighting to private property. 2. Set back (detach) the frontage rd sidewalk 6' from back of curb east of the porte cochere exit. Sod shall be installed between the curb and walk. 3. Use attached sidewalk detail for sidewalks located within the right-of-way. 4. Use TY 13 curb inlets vs TY R where the sidewalk is attached to the curb. 5. If necessary, raise Spraddle Creek vault #I manhole to finished grade. 6. The cross-walk at the roundabout shall be asphalt thru the travel lanes and concrete only across the median. 7. Use CDOT TY 3A curb ramps at the roundabout, 6' width at the throat. 8. Storm line A shall be at I% minimum slope. Leaving the existing proposed invert elev at TY R inlet 3 and working upstream at I% appears to still allow for a min of 2' cover at the existing inlet on the north side of the frontage road. 9. Sheet E1.00, please turn off extra curb&gutter alignment. 10. Install 24" conduits to medians for irrigation and 34" conduits to the west median for future use. Spraddle Creek Drainage I . Per previous agreement with the Town, Four-Seasons is responsible for the construction cost of continuing Spraddle Creek to STA 4+40. 2. Install an impermeable membrane around the RCP/CBC due to proposed landscaping and irrigation. 3. Please provide additional detail of proposed walls along the RCP/CBC alignment. Construction of these walls shall be designed so as not to disturb/undermine the RCP/CBC. W Meadow Drive 1. Final approval of the West Meadow Drive construction drawings will be completed in conjunction with the Town of Vail design. Modifications to tie-in grades on the Four Seasons site may be necessary to accommodate this final design. W Meadow plans shall also develop streetscape related items in the right-of-way (street lighting, landscaping, etc). 2. Storm line G alignment needs to be revised. There is not enough room to install between Spraddle Creek and a large tree on the south side of W Meadow that shall be protected. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. 3. Storm line E appears to in conflict with the recently installed water line. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. Landscaping/Irrigation 1. Detailed landscaping comments to follow within the next couple of weeks. 2. Coordinate irrigation with TOV irrigation supervisor for final head type/location and water source. 3. The Town is currently in talks with CDOT on permissible landscaping within CDOT right-of-way. Fire Department Conditions- 1. LSR, MOU's and Administrative Modifications must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protection Engineer of record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not accepted. RJA allegedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence has not been presented. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans is not accepted. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additional review. Cond: CON0010349 Sub-duct system for the dryers and range hoods is not approved. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R080001789 Amount: $2,760.00 09/29/200803:54 PM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: LC Notation: VISA FROM MARK M. REED Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 161,267.90 This Payment: $2,760.00 Total ALL Pmts: 161,267.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300, PLAN CK - protect GFP012 9 7Fn nn September 29, 2008 Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official, Town of Va 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Description: Bulletin #5, Addressing mechanical issues from original review. RE: PROJECT: 4 Seasons PERMIT NUMBER: B06-0196 REVISION NUMBER: 18 INTERNAL REF 7988 ADDRESS: 1 Vail Road Dear Mr. Haeberle: SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Codes as adopted by the Town of Vail. SAFEbuilt Colorado finds the documents submitted to be complete and issuance of the mechanical permit is allowed with the following conditions. The approved Administrative Modification regarding the sub-duct system is for the residential bath fans only. The residential dryer and residential range hood sub-duct systems have not been approved. A separate analysis has been provided by the mechanical engineer and is currently under review by the Town of Vail's Building Department, the Town of Vail's Fire Department and SAFEbuilt. This issue is pending and will be commented on under a separate cover. The work on these sub-duct systems for the residential dryers and range hoods are not authorized. 2 There is a vertical riser supplying the elevator lobbies E-113, E-213, E-313 and originating from Level 4. This duct is required to be in a rated shaft and FSD required at the openings in the shaft. This has been red-lined on the plans. (IMC 607.6, 607.5.5.1) Plans: Description: 74 Mechanical sheets Sincerely, John Plano Plans Examiner SAFEbuilt Colorado john.planoLaSAFEbuilt.com SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618,/ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 v/ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Page 1 of 1 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Season s\tov B06-0196 Rev18 FAL.doc S A F bu l It inc. f2'fv. /8 TOWN OF VAIL 2 (9:8 co1l('0108 o APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIGNED Building Permit 970-479-2149 (Inspections) REVISION TO TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING PERMIT Separate Permits are required for electrical, plumbing, mechanical, etc .1 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 ***All Revision submittals must include the Field Set of approved plans. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved CONTRACTOR INFORMATION General Contractor: Town of Vail Reg. No.: Contact and Phone #'s: L., 1.1, c~ 1j 11 12 -_2.) 1 //4 q 7Q , - d l ATTENTION: JOE, JR, CHARLIE, GREG, CHRIS OMPLETE REVISIONS EVALUATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMIT Labor x Materials REVISED AMOUNT: $ ELECTRICAL: $ OTHER: $ 1 PLUMBING: $ MECHANICAL: $ J REVISED TOTAL: $ For Parcel # Contact Eaale Countv Assessors Office at 97n__'?2R-RRdn nr vicif innnnei canlo_nniinf" Parcel # Job Name: ro&. R Job Address: 0,--,10- C'_ Legal Description Lot: Block: Filing: Subdivision: Owners Name: Address: Phone: Architect/Designer: Address: Phone: Engineer: Address: Phone: REASON FOR REVISIONS: eC_ «a }/4 1 C Work Class: New( ) Addition ( ) Remodel ( ) Repair ( ) Demo ( ) Other ( ) Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Both( ) Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes( ) No( ) Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Two-family ( ) Multi-family ( ) Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other ( ) No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: No. of Accommodation Units in this building: No/Type of Fireplaces Existin : Gas Appliances Gas Los Wood/Pellet Wood Burning No/Type of Fireplaces Proposed: Gas Appliances Gas Los Wood/Pellet Wood Burning NOT ALLOWED Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes( ) No( ) Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes( ) No ( ) *************************************************FOR OFFICE USE ONLY********************************************** Date Received: Permit Fee (10): Plan Ck Fee (80): Accepted By: Permit Fee (11): Plan Ck Fee (81): Outsourced Terms: F:\cdev\FORMS\Permits\Building\building_revision_4-18-2007.doc Page 1 of 1 4/18/2007 TOWN OF VAfL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Permit # B06-0196 Project PRJ03-0468 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Status . ISSUED Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD Applied 07/18/2006 Parcel No...: 210107101016 Issued. 11/28/2007 Expires . 09/26/2007 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 07/19/2006 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR LAYTON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC 07/19/2006 Phone: (801) 568-9090 9090 S. SANDY PARKWAY SANDY UTAH 84040 License: 333-A APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS 07/19/2006 Phone: 612-3 32-1500 600 FOSHAY TOWER 821 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 License: 0000001981 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Occupancy Type NIGHT CLUBS (A2) ZONE 4 IB CHURCHES (A3) ZONE 4 IB BUSINESS(B)& HMP (H5 ZONE 4 IB EDUCATIONAL (E) ZONE 4 IB INDUSTRIAL/MOD HAZ ( ZONE 4 IB MERCANTILE (M) ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/HOTELS ( ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/MULTFAM( ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/MOD HAZ (S1) ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/LOW HAZ(S2) ZONE 4 IB Totals... Factor Sq Feet Valuation 299.08 27,353 $8,180,735.24 369.90 8,605 $3,182,989.50 300.40 31,130 $9,351,452.00 322.53 670 $216,095.10 183.77 29,600 $5,439,592.00 220.56 2,445 $539,269.20 302.22 86,991$26,290,420.02 250.22 133,695$33,453,162.90 169.75 23,080 $3,917,830.00 167.15 75,773$12,665,456.95 399,510$103,237,002.9* TOV Adjusted Valuation: 3,237,002.91 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $237,002.91 *:.*ss~r*a*******+•****+a*a*►+*a*+s*s+**+***:**s**+*r****+**** FEE SUMMARY **+**+**►******s***e***+***ss**#**►*+*+s**e*+***►*** Building > 378, 777.45 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees 157, 067.90 Plan Check 378,777.45 Recreation Fee--------------> 399, 510.00 Additional Fees-----------> $1,440. 00 InvestigAon-> $0.00 TOTAL FEES > 157, 067.90 Total Permit Fee------ 158, 507.90 Will Call-----> $3 . 0 0 Payments > 158,507.90 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0. 00 Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e-mailed to applicant. 12/18/2006 cdavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set for plan < by TOV 12/13/06. An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer. 03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR:1215- G&E permit approval only. Conditic 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only 06/12/2007 CDAVIS Action: PA Tower Crane footing pads. No additional fees assessed 07/16/2007 jplano Action: CR Additional work being requested to be adde( phasing, correction letter sent. 08/01/2007 jplano Action: CR Second correction letter sent, insuffient supplied. 3) The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design professioi architect and/or engineer. The design professionals are to verify that the additi( being requested is not in conflict with the corrections that are requested regard: building permit. Ali sheets are to be stamped and signed by the associated design professional. The architectural and the plumbing sheets have not been stamped. The stamp on the stri sheets has not been signed. The stamp on the electrical sheets has not been signet 4 There is insufficient detail to approve this submittal. Some examples are: a) There are several sections that are pertinent to this request that are not pros b) The elevator pit sections 10/S4.04, 18/S4.04, 19/S4.04, 20/S4.04 are missing. c) Ramp transition section 22/S6.01, 6/S6.01, 7/S4.04 are missing d) Exterior foundation wall connection to the matt slab 9/S6.01D, 27/S6.01, 6/S.0: 7/S6.01 e) Sump pit details 28/S4.04 and 29/S4.04 f) Column schedule, transition of the columns to slab? g) Slab steps 11/S6.01D. This review has stopped because of lack of information. 5 The Public Works Department in Vail has not approved the submittal for additionE be added to the phasing. Their approval will be necessary. 08/06/2007 jplano Action: PA Additional work approved for phasing. Under plumbing, underground electrical, rebar and concrete placement for elevator and si APPROVAL FOR MAT SLAB 09/11/2007 jplano Action: AP 10/22/2007 DPLACE Action: PA No charge. 10/22/2007 dplace Action: PA 11/13/2007 ependley Action: AP stamps. No added valuation. 11/15/2007 ependley Action: AP Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 11/30/2007 jplano Action: AP Full permit approved, see conditions REV 4 IR 5881: Approved shop drawings for REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAL REVS/IR6042. Approved shop drawings for de: Rev7/IR6058. Approved RFI-0237, No added vi Rev6/IR6057. Approved RFI-0221, No added vE Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 12/18/2007 JPLANO Action: AP Rev9/IR6236. Approved shop drawings for po: slabs, no added valuation 12/26/2007 jplano Action: AP Rev10/IR6252. Approved changing a post ten: with thickened slab. $120.00 due 12/27/2007 MROYER Action: AP Revll/IR6266,6267. Rebar shop drawings rev: appropiate stamps, no charge 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA REV 12 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER LAYTON Si #05510-004 (EMBEDS @ LEVEL 1, 2, 3 ns 4) FROM JT STEEL NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE 03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA EV.13 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER SUBMITTAL (STUD RAILS, LEVELS 4 & 5) FROM SUNCOAST NO ADDTIONAL CHARGE 06/10/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev14,15,16, IR6685,6687,7744 are approved of plan review due, $720.00 07/08/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 19, IR 7989 are approved, Bulletins 10,25,29,31,35,40 - 8 hours of plan review due, $480.00 Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the He Utility relocation permit request. The applicant shall remove only those trees wh: absolutely necessary for the utility relocation work. 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the al to dewater the site. 03/31/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning recieved a bond to cover the Grad: Excavation in the amount of 3.2 million. Planning has approved the grading and ex( permit. 06/25/2007 Warren Action: COND Planning has approved the tull building pei dated recieved on May 29, 2007, with a single condition. A complete Design Review will need to be submitted for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs the pool deck to West Meadow Drive. 08/20/2007 Warren Action: AP The set of plans provided to allow tro the some work prior to release of a tull building permit has been approved. The plans stamped July 26, 2007 09/05/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning is approving the set of plans dat( 2007, with the condition that the applicant submits a revised landscaping plan to) approval prior to requesting a TCO. 11/02/2007 GRUTHER Action: AP REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAI 06/12/2008 Warren Action: AP The planning departmetn signs ott on Bullet 23A with one condition. The gate on teh new set of stairs shal be as the base of t on the pool deck not on the top of the stairs adjacent to Meadow Drive. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding. Review: Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied: 1. Fire Dept staging on south side of the west end. The hydrant on the west side. Sheet A0.3.00 2. Sheet A0.3.05 does not show an acc Fire Command Center. 3. The plans submitted by RJA are not 4. The plans show a dead end corridor project is shown on east end. The apporved end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on °ptable route to the interior of the buildinc stamped and are labeled "Not for Constructic behind the front desk. 5. 12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is 91 Relocate electrical disconnect to site. Location as proposed on pla 03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: 07/11/2007 McGee Action: as submitted 7 11 07. 09/07/2007 McGee Action: the su PA AP AP AP trailer or provide ready access on southwest bmitted 12/13/06 is not accepted. g and e permit is approved For G & E only Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3A approved for l: The full permit is approved as noted: Life Safety Report 5 22 07 1. LSR, MOU's, and Admin Mod's must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protect: of Record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not RJA alledgedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence ha: presented. 3. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans, is not accepted. 5. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to addition Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 10/20/2006 is Action: DN Awaiting for additional information 12/20/2006 is Action: PA Approval to allow grading and prep work foi installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for t access for small construction vehicles ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive. 03/26/2007 is Action: PA Staging plan for Phase 1 of the G&E permit only. Engineer approval for the G&E permit still required currently under review. staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only 08/07/2007 csalli Action: AP additional work proposed for phased permit no approval for mat slab 09/13/2007 csalli Action: DN waiting for executed MOU 10/04/2007 TK Action: AP Approved Building Permit with the condtion., the memo dated 8/5/07 from Chad Salli. Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit # B06-0196 as of 07-24-2008 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS J. BRINK 612-332-1500 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Conditions: Cond: CON0008815 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3/28/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 Applied: 07/18/2006 Issued: 11/28/2007 To Expire: 09/26/2007 The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the full building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original comment number for clarity. General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule" to prevent a room that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor". The Fire and Life Safety Report prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants. These will be required for full permit issuance. General: The Fire & Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved prior to the approval for full building permit. 3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units 3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is discharging. 8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C-414, is actually a horizontal portion of Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or remove the designation of passageway. 10) See the general comment above. 11) See the general comment above. 12) See the general comment above. 13) See the general comment above. 16) See the general comment above 22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be tested in accordance with ASTME 119, tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire-resistance rating not less than the fire-resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the window when responding for full building permit. 23) See the general comment above. 39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures. Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly. This item has no impact on the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building permit issuance. 42) See response the comment number 39 46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space is not accessory. 46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 210A as there is no access to stair Q. Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel. 49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved by the Town of Vail's Building Official. 57 through 61 and 149) The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 14 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 17 (BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FRAMING INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED FOR. Cond: 35 (P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: 5 (PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPRINT SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC. Cond: CON0009095 The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review aplication for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs added from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive, within 30 days of the release of the building permit. Cond: CON0009121 The applicant shall submit a seperate Design Review application for review and approval for all signage design, locations, and materials prior to installation. Cond: CON0009294 The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan which addresses the landscaping conflicts created by the shallow soild depths on the culvert containing Spraddle Creek. This plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to requesting a certifcate of occupancy. Cond: CON0009330 SAFEbuilt Colorado Conditions of Approval To: Layton Construction Re: Full Building Permit Conditions of Approval The following conditions will be required to be addressed prior to construction. Sufficient time shall be granted for review, response and approval before work is initiated. Building Department- The items listed within the building department comments are numbered to correspond with the 3 round comment letter dated 08/21/2007. 46. Change the exiting from Vestibule 210A. It appears to exit through intervening room that is not accessory to the vestibule. HGA Response: We submit that the adjacent space is accessory. Vestibule 210A services mechanical rooms and the service elevators. To exit from Vestibule 210A the occupants have to pass through Vestibule 275A, which is basically for the spa staff, then through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area, then to hallway 279, then through exit passageway 293, then through exit passageway 297, then to exit discharge. The issue is that the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting area is not accessory to the mechanical rooms. It is accessory for the rooms off Vestibule 275A for the staff of the spa but not the mechanical areas. Please change the layout accordingly. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Vestibule 210A is purely circulation space and does not carry an occupant load. This vestibule provides connection between the Spa and the service elevators, IDF Room 210, and Mechanical Room 257. Relative to egress, it provides the egress route for the one occupant from IDF 210 and the one occupant from Mechanical 257 (as shown on A0.3.02). IDF 210, Mechanical 257, Vestibule 210A, and Service Elevator Lobby E-202 are considered to be part of the overall Spa as they serve Spa functions. The service elevators stop at this location solely to provide connection to the Spa. IDF 210 houses audio-visual, telephone, and data system equipment that specifically serves the Spa and must be accessed by Spa personnel. Similarly, Mechanical 257 houses the equipment serving the pools within Room 255 and must be accessed by Spa staff. In summary, we submit that all these spaces are part of the overall Spa and are "accessory" to each other. Therefore, current layout provides egress that complies with IBC 1013.2 as the spaces are accessory, are not hazard occupancies, and provide a discernible path of travel to an exit. This comment is in reference to the electrical room #212. Please revise 64. A2.03.1 - Wall tag both shafts located in room 304 (storage room). Wall tags must reference an approved assembly from the partition schedule. HGA Response: Wall tag has been added. One shaft in room 304 does not have wall tags. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The drawing has been updated to include wall tags for this shaft. Still have one shaft not tagged Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. 152. Provide accessible parking spaces per IBC Table 1106. 1. Providing 212 spaces would require 7 to be accessible, 2 of those to be van accessible. Verify 98" of vertical clearance for the van spots. HGA Response: We submit that the number of accessible parking stalls complies with IBC Table 1106.1 and section 1106.5. The hotel is operating on 100% valet parking stalls, with an additional 59 self-park stalls for fractional ownership, full ownership, and employee. Per Table 1 106.1, 3 stalls are required for the self-parking, and at least one of the three is required to be van accessible. Plan sheet A0.3.01 indicates there are 228 parking spaces. Spaces marked for Valet parking number 78. With those counts, Table 1106.1.3 would require 5 accessible spaces with one van accessible space. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Per previous response, most of the parking spaces are valet only. There are 59 self-park stalls that will be allocated to fractional ownership, full ownership condos, and employees. The drawings have been updated to identify each space as either valet or self-park. We submit that only the 59 self-park stalls are considered per Table 1106.1 and that the number of accessible spaces required are provided. Deducting the 78 Valet parking from the total spaces, you are still required to add two additional accessible spaces for a total number of 5 accessible spaces. 155. All the massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. Please amend the toilet facilities, changing rooms, lavatories, tubs and the showers meet to accessibility requirements of the ANSI A117.1-98. (IBC 1109.14.3) HGA Response: We submit the Wet Massage Suite #289 complies with the accessibility requirements of ANSI A117.1-98 (IBC 1109.14.3). All massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We disagree that IBC 1109.14.3 requires that ALL spa treatment rooms be accessible. IBC 1109.14 pertains to "recreational facilities". If the Spa is going to be considered a "recreational facility" then it should be considered as a whole. As such, the Spa is accessible - it provides accessibility at the entry/reception, locker rooms, toilets, showers, whirlpools, lounges, treatment rooms, etc. We submit that nothing requires ALL treatment rooms to be accessible any more than ALL lockers, ALL toilets, or ALL showers. Add grab bars at the tub in room 289 for accessibility. 167. We are unable to locate a designated accessible Type "A" condominium per Section 1 107.6.2 of the 2003 IBC. As the condominiums are a different type of R-2 occupancy from the time-share units, an accessible Type "A" condominium is required. HGA Response: Since only 16 condominiums are proposed, no Type "A" units are required. Refer to IBC 1107.6.2.1.1. With the condominiums, employee housing and timeshare units there are a total of 63 units classified as an R-2 occupancy group. Per Section 1107.6.2.1.1 Type A units shall be dispersed among the various classes of units. Therefore a Type A accessible unit is required in each of the following groups: the condominiums, the employee housing, and the timeshare units. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): To resolve this issue we have revised Condo #8 (on Level 9, sheet A4.28.1)) to be a "Type A" unit per ICC/ANSI A117.1. Two accessible employee housing units and one accessible timeshare unit are already provided and indicated on the drawings. Comment 169-180 - Submit a Memorandum of Understanding to the Town of Vail for approval by the Building Official to reference the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1. If accepted by the town, please revise entire plan to comply with the 2003 ICC/ANSI A-117.1 in its entirety. If not accepted please revise plans per 1998 ANSI A-117.1 and comments above. 169. In the accessible units in the guest rooms of the R-1 occupancy, all bathing & toilet facilities are required to be accessible per Chapter 6 of ANSI A] 17.1. HGA Response: We submit that the accessible units include the accessible bathing and toilet facilities and comply with Chapter 6 of ANSI A] 17. 1. Plan sheet A4.07.1 A and A4.07.1 B for Unit PR-HC shows a raised platform in media room # 116 which does not have an accessible route. Also, bathrooms/rooms # 103, # 108, # 109, # 110, # 133 do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The raised platform within Media 1 16 is intended to provide tiered seating within this "home theater". We submit that an accessible route is not required for this small platform as it is less than 25% of the overall room and the remainder of the room is accessible. While this room is not an "assembly" space, we submit that IBC 1 108.2.4.1, exception 2 provides guidance regarding this room. See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.06.1 for Unit 2KK-HC has bathrooms/rooms # 103, 4108 which do not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.05.3 for Unit 1K-HC has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.04AA for Unit ES2-HC has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms. Plan sheet A4.01.1 for Unit K1-H1 has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Unit type K1-HI is a unit for the hearing impaired. It is not an accessible unit. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We submit that only one accessible bathroom is required within an accessible hotel unit. This requirement is consistent with the federal standard - ADAAG Chapter 9. To interpret IBC Chapter 11 as requiring that ALL bathrooms must be accessible is to raise the standard beyond the federal requirements. We submit that this is not reasonable, does not reflect industry standard, and is not the intent of the IBC / ICC. Rather, we submit that the IBC / ICC intends to coordinate and correlate with the federal standards. As an example, we can examine the accessibility requirements for condominiums. The federal standard is the FHA Fair Housing Design Manual. This document allows condo units to be provided with one "Specification B" bathroom and that is the highest level of accessibility. Similarly, the 2003 edition of ICC / ANSI A117.1 has been revised to better correlate to FHA and require that "Type A" units provide "at least one" accessible bathroom . The common thread is the requirement is for one or "at least one" accessible bathroom - not all. Since the ADAAG, FHA Design Manual, and A117 (2003) all require one or "at least one" accessible bathroom it is reasonable to interpret the IBC's requirements in the same manner. Otherwise, all the hotel units would be held to a higher standard than the condominium units within the same building. 170. In Type "A" dwelling units of the R-2 occupancies, all toilet and bathing facilities must comply with Sections 1002.11.1 through 1002.11.7 of ANSI Al 17.1. Some Type "A" dwelling units have bathrooms which do not comply. Please clarify. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We request that ICC/ANSI A117.1 - 2003 be used as the applicable edition relative to the "Type A" condominium. This is the most recent version of A117 and our research has found that the various revisions in Chapter 10 were intended to correct the intent of various provisions and to better coordinate with federal requirements (FHA and ADA). Per 1003.1 1.1 of the Al 17-2003, at least one bathroom is required to comply with 1003.11. This correlates with FHA requirements ("Specification B" bathrooms) and Chapter 9 of the ADA. Therefore, we submit that the latest intent of the various codes and standards is that at least one bathroom, but not all, is required to comply with 1003.11. 17 1. In Type "A" dwelling units, a permanent seat is required at the head end of the bathtub per Section 607 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): ICC/ANSI A117.1 - 1998, 607.3 states that a permanent seat OR a removable in-tub seat shall be provided. However, 1002.11.6, exception 1, states that the removable in-tub seat required by 607.3 is NOT required. Since 607.3 gives the option of either permanent or removable seats, we submit that the true intent of 1002.11.6, exception 1 is to NOT require either type of seat. ICC / ANSI A117.1 - 2003 carries similar language, but also includes Figure 1003.11.8 (a) to clarify that the seat (permanent or removable) can be omitted. 172. In Type "A" dwelling units, clearance in front of bathtubs shall extend the length of the bathtub and shall be 30 inches wide minimum per Section 607 of ANSI A] 17. 1. Some of the bathtubs have lavatories encroaching into the required clearances. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required bathtub clear floor area is indicated. 173. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.11.1 of ANSI A117.1, doors shall not swing into the clear floor or ground space or clearance for any fixture, unless a clear floor space of 30 inches minimum by 48 inches minimum is located beyond the arc of the door swing. There are water closet compartments and some other bathroom areas that do not meet those requirements. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. The door swings do not swing into the other clear floor spaces. 174. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.13 of ANSI A117.1, where operable windows are provided, at least one window in each sleeping, living, or dining space shall have operable parts complying with Section 1002.13 of ANSI A 117.1. All windows of "accessible units" shall comply with Section 309 of ANSI A117.1, Operable Parts. Provide documentation showing compliance. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. A note has been added to indicate requirement that all operable windows (and sliding doors) comply with 1002.13. 175. For Type "A" and "accessible units", provide details showing accessibility compliance for the operable parts of the showers, lavatory height, lavatory knee and toe clearance, and bathroom mirror height per Section 1002.11 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to interior elevations shown within the Interior Design drawings. I am unable to locate the Interior Design Drawings in the plan set submitted. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to accessibility details illustrated on sheet A0.4.3. 180. For Type "A" dwelling units, provide details showing accessibility compliance for kitchen work surfaces, sinks, range controls, and refrigerator/freezer requirements per Section 1002.12 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167. See response to comment # 167. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required kitchen features are illustrated. 183. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the condominiums, some "U" shaped kitchens do not have the required 60 inch minimum clearance between opposing base cabinets per Section 1003.12 of ANSI A117.1. HGA Response: Sheets A4.22.1, A4.25.1, and A4.30.1 have been revised to provide 60" clearance at U-shaped kitchens. Provide corrected plan sheets. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These sheets are included in the 7/18/07 resubmittal set. 185. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the time share units, the water closets do not have required clearances and some doors encroach required clearances per Section 1003.11.2 of ANSI A 117.1. HGA Response: Refer to the response to comment # 186 below. As such, there are no Type "B" timeshare units. See response to comment # 186. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to response to comment # 186. 186. Is Option "A" being used for the bathroom fixtures in the Type "B", Time-share units? If so, each fixture is required to meet the requirements of the option per Section 1003.1 1.3.1 of ANSI A117.1. Please clarify. HGA Response: As previously discussed and resolved, the timeshare units are transient occupancy (similar to hotel units) and not residences. As such, one accessible timeshare unit is provided per IBC Table 1107.6.1.1. This accessible unit is 43103 located on Level 03. The enlarged plan for this accessible unit is on sheet A4.12.1 A and the associated H/C bathroom in 2/A4.12.2A. Provide signed letters from persons representing the operating authority for this facility stating that the timeshare units will not be used as residences. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These letters will be submitted by ownership 203. Enclose both mechanical rooms on the 9th level in 2 hour rated construction, it appears that the 2 hour shafts from below terminate in these rooms. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet M4.06 (Part Plan Attachment No. M06). The Area 3A mechanical room is unrated, and the 2 hour rated vertical risers through the building through the 8th floor slab. In order to avoid the installation of inaccessible fire dampers at the top of the riser, RYBKA have revised sheet M4.06 to ductwork is to be fire rated in the attic space. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. The Area 3B mechanical room is a 2 hour rated room that ends at column line A14. The ductwork that extends to the south across column line A] 4 is 2 hour fire rated to avoid the installation of fire dampers in inaccessible locations. Fire dampers are shown in the penetrations of the two hour rated Area 3B mechanical room, where ductwork exist the mechanical room. A) The mechanical room on the 9th level over "AREA-03A"has not been addressed on the plan sheets. The partial ninth floor plan on 8 ''/z" x 11 " indicate wrapping ducts. If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire-rated access doors for service. Ductwork is to be wrapped to provide 2 hour fire rating in attic space. (Refer to Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03). Provide architectural details rated enclosure. B) In the mechanical room labeled 911 the rated walls do not appear to enclose the room entirely. The wall is labeled 30 minutes on the north end and the wall is labeled 1 hour where Trash 912 (above "AREA-0313") is located on sheet A0.3.09. There are 3 duct penetrations in this area to be addressed, 28x 10 S/E FB, 24x 18 G/e F/B and 24x 14 S/A F/A TB. Rybka Response: Refer to Architectural Sheet A0.3.09 where Mechanical Room 911 is to be provided with 2 hour rating. Three ducts identified enter riser shaft from Mechanical Room 911 and riser is considered to be connected to and form part of mechanical room and so no fire smoke damper is provided. The ducts in question enter a shaft in the floor below within Maid Room G-711. Fire/Smoke Dampers are required where these ducts enter the shaft. One duct is not in a shaft. Please address accordingly. C) How will the 2 hour shaft assembly be maintained at EF-14 and EF-30? If duct wrap is used on the fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function and not over heat. Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be rated for operation within rated enclosures by fan manufacturer or are to be relocated within Mechanical Room 911. Provide architectural details for the shafts. 214. Add a fire/smoke damper to the penetration by the 8x6 duct that penetrates the 30 minute fire partition on page M2.08.1 on grid line 11 and between A9 and A10. Rybka Response: Fire dampers are not required in one hour rated fire barriers per IMC 607.5.2. (Refer to Response No. 208.) This is not a fire barrier; it is a fire partition defining a rated corridor. A fire/smoke damper is required for this duct. Rybka Response: Combination fire smoke damper is provided where this duct exits the rated shaft. The response indicates an Vs damper has been added to the duct as exits the rated shaft. A smoke damper is required where it penetrates the rated corridor. 215. Fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Rybka Response: Mechanical floor plan sheets, sheets M2.01.1 thru M2.11.1 have been revised to show: Combination fire smoke dampers (FSD) or shunt duct* on rated shaft penetrations. " FD in duct floor penetrations when no more than three floors are penetrated, and FD on 2 hour rated wall penetrations. * shunt ducts per NFPA 90A (2002), Figure A.5.3. NFPA 90A is not an adopted document by the Town of Vail or referenced in the IMC. The review team is not familiar with the term "shunt duct". Fire smoke dampers are required at the shaft and corridor duct penetrations. (IMC 607.5.3, 607.5.4 and 607.5.5.1) Rybka Response: The 2006 IMC now calls the use of 22" upturned sheet metal ducts in 2 hour fire rated risers as 'sub ducts'. The provision of the 'sub duct' is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. The use of sub ducts on the project is shown in Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03. M2.03.1 - Remove designations for shunt ducts for the ducts run in the garage exhaust shaft. Rybka Response: EF-8, EF-43 and residential dryer exhaust have been shown terminating in a vertical areaway (garage exhaust riser) that is always being exhausted by EF-1 B on emergency power. It was agreed during the June TOV plan review meeting that this condition is analogous to the 'sub duct' provisions identified earlier. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 2. In Group B and R occupancies equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 of the International Building Code, smoke dampers are not required at penetrations of shafts where kitchen, clothes, dryer, bathroom and toilet room exhaust openings with steel exhaust subducts, having a wall thickness of at least 0.019 inch (0.48 mm) extend at least 22 inches (559 mm) vertically and the exhaust fan at the upper terminus is powered continuously in accordance with the provisions of Section 909.11 of the International Building Code, and maintains airflow upward to the outdoors. The drawings are still substantially incomplete when labeling FSD's. I will attempt to identify some locations. It will be up to the design team to identify all locations. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts exit rated shafts. All drawings are indicting F.D. on the bathroom exhausts where penetrating the shaft. There is an administrative modification request to eliminate dampers on the bathroom exhausts. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FD designations at restroom exhausts have been deleted where 'sub-ducts' are provided per the administrative modification. The drawings are indicating ducts from below and ducts from above. Please create a tag for sub-ducts and clearly mark the plans on all the ducts that are to be utilizing this system. M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-301 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 2-8x6 ducts and 1-10x6 duct. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C-311 that are labeled F.D. these are required to be FSD. 1-8x10 duct and 1-12x6. Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not required. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-301 and C-311 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the 14VAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.03.3 - All duct penetrations through the shafts are marked F.D. These are required to be FSD. There are too many to list individually. Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided where ducts penetrate rated shafts. There are multiple places that indicate FSD's where an administrative modification has been requested to utilize a 22" sub-duct. Please coordinate. M2.04.1 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C-401 and C-411 to FSD. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) M2.04.1 - There is a 14x10 duct supplying corridor C-411 missing a damper designation. The duct is near A9.9 and 11/11.4. Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided. If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers. This duct has changed size to 12x8 since last review. SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4) These are just a few of the un-complying damper designations, stopped review on this correction. Again, fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607. Reconfiguration is still necessary. 216. Ductwork, pipes and electrical are prohibited in an exit passageways unless serving the exit passageway. It appears that above non-rated ceilings in the exit passageways the space is being used as a plenum and contains construction elements not allowed, please address all exit passageways. Rybka Response: Mechanical services not associated with exit passageways have been relocated. The review team's interpretation of IBC 1020.5 is that any ductwork serving an exit passageway shall be a completely separate system from the rest of the building and separate from all other passageways. Also, this system is required for pressurization. 1020.5 Penetrations. Penetrations into and openings through an exit passageway are prohibited except for required exit doors, equipment and ductwork necessary for independent pressurization, sprinkler piping, standpipes, electrical raceway for fire department communication and electrical raceway serving the exit passageway and terminating at a steel box not exceeding 16 square inches (0.010 m2). Such penetrations shall be protected in accordance with Section 712. There shall be no penetrations or communicating openings, whether protected or not, between adjacent exit passageways. Rybka Response: It is our understanding that only portions of the building service systems that serve the exit enclosure are allowed to penetrate the exit enclosure. We note that IBC 1019.1.3, VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURE, VENTILATION, Item.2 permits HVAC equipment (FCUs) to be located in the exit enclosure: 10 19.1.3 Ventilation. Equipment and ductwork for exit enclosure ventilation shall ....where located within the building, be separated from the remainder of the building, including other mechanical equipment, with construction as required for shafts. All ductwork serving the exit passageways shall be protected at the point of penetration of the passageway with a fire/smoke damper. The passageway is an extension of the vertical exit enclosure that it serves and lesser protection is not allowed. (1017.1) Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, and have provided FSD where make-up air ductwork penetrates the exit enclosure. M2.03. I- There is a duct termination shown in Stair Q exit enclosure, labeled "16x12 Employee Dryer T/A". This is not allowed in an exit enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been revised to show routing of dryer exhaust so that it does not pass through Stair Q. M2.04.1 - There is an 8x6 duct penetration within the exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.04.1 - There is a transfer opening 24x4 within exit passageway C-402. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization; this transfer opening is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted. M2.05.3 - There is a 6" duct shown penetrating Stair N exit enclosure. Please move out of the enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Sheet M2.05.3 has been revised and ductwork has been rerouted so as not to pass through Stair N. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-601 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the elevator lobby and maid's room. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-601. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 3.3/4 and A 11. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - There is a duct penetration between Exit Passageway C-601 and Stair S-601. Penetrations are not allowed. (IBC 10 19.1.2) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C-611 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-61 1 is not deliberate and is to be deleted. M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 and a 12x6 duct passing through Exit Passageway C-611. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. Grid lines 11/11.4 and A8.2/A9.9. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.06.1 - There is a 20x10 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C-611. It is shown using a 2 hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines 133/134.3 and BC/BD. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. M2.06.2 - There is a 12x10 duct penetrating the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that Stair S-605 is connected to exit passageway C-614. and that the 'unlabeled passageway' is rated 2 hours, this upper level of the hallway is rated to provide separation between levels 4 and 5 and this portion of the ceiling space does connect to a rated vertical exit enclosure, the hallway is not an exit passageway, and that 1020.5 does not apply. M2.06.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S-605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: See previous comment. M2.07.2 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-717. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C-717 are not intended to function as returns, are to be shown 'blanked-off and are provided for aesthetic reasons only. M2.07.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway. M2.07.3 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C-712. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor from the guest room. M2.08.1 and M2.08.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C-803. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. Penetrations are not allowed fire wrapped or not. (IBC 1020.5) Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate the exit passageway. These comments are still outstanding. Tim Willings P.E. with Rybka met with the plans examiner on 8/14/07 to bring updated drawings addressing these corrections. It was advised to submit the drawings when all other comments are addressed. 222. Please address the garage exhaust on the east side of the structure that will cause a nuisance thru the casement windows (W 102) in rooms 5318, 6318 and 7318. Rybka Response: Refer to sheet A2.05.2 for plan location, and sheet A0.7.2 (W102) for window type. Architect to revise window to be fixed type. HGA Response: The architectural documents have been revised to provide fixed windows at these three locations. The architectural drawings are indicating windows W 102. This window is casement not fixed on sheet A0.7.2. Please coordinate. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Revised drawings indicating fixed windows at these locations are included with this resubmittal. Since this review, the Town of Vail has informed our review team that garage exhausts on the CO2 detectors are product-conveying outlets requiring being 10' above grade, 10' from openings into the building and 10' from property lines. The continuous fan is considered environmental, thus allowing 3' from openings and 3' from property lines. Please address accordingly. 224. Please indicate how the 18" flue from the gas ironer, on the 3rd level is routed thru the loading dock above on the 4th level. Rybka Response: Laundry gas-fired flat ironer vent leaves the laundry room at level 3 (Sheet M2.03. I ) and runs vertically through the building in a rated chase with fire enclosed offsets before being vented at the roof of level 11 (Sheet M2.1 L I). M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Provide architectural details for the shaft. 228. Specify on the plans the location of EC-1, Type I fan for the kitchen. Rybka Response: Sheet M4.04 has been revised to show Ecology Unit EC-1 in Ecology Room M-402A. Ecology Room M-402A as designed is a component of the grease duct enclosure. "The duct enclosure shall serve a single grease exhaust duct system and shall not contain any other ducts, piping, wiring or systems." Remove the other exhaust fans, ducting and electrical within the room not associated with the Type 1 duct. (IMC 506.3.10) Rybka Response: The 2 hour rated architectural enclosure of the Ecology unit has been reconfigured to that only the ductwork and equipment associated with the commercial kitchen exhaust is contained within the Ecology Room M-402A. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour wall and 90 minute door that is shown on the mechanical drawings. 233. Indicate on the plans that the 36" dryer duct and the 18" flue from the Ironer are in a 2 hour shaft on the 6th level, page M2.06.1. Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, the 36" dryer exhaust duct and 18" gas-fired flat ironer vent that both run horizontally at level 6 (on sheet M2.06.1) are to be in a 2-hr fire rated enclosure. M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized is listed to be wrapped with insulation. (from comment 224) Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2 hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap. Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour shaft walls and details for construction. Please show compliance to IBC 707.11 for the bottom of the shaft housing the 34" dryer duct. 234. Provide manufacturers instructions to verify the dryers in rooms 312 and 31 OD are capable of exhausting the developed length shown on the plans. Rybka Response: Residential dryer exhaust system shown on Sheet M2.03.1 serving Employee Laundry Room 3 I OD and Valet Room 317, with quantity five (4+1) dryer exhaust connections to dryer exhaust EF-43 has been rerouted. In addition to the lint filter integral to the appliance, and auxiliary lint trap and cleanout has been shown on the common dryer exhaust duct system before the duct leaves the Employee Laundry Room 31 OD. The entire length of the residential dryer exhaust duct is to be fire wrapped to maintain clearances to combustibles. Discharge of laundry dryer exhaust is routed to exterior via connection to rated garage exhaust riser. Penetration is protected by fire wrap and minimum 22" shunt duct extended into garage exhaust riser. In addition, RYBKA have specified a laundry exhaust booster fan EF-43 which is interlocked with dryer operation. Dryer exhaust ducts are required to terminate to the outside the building and shall be equipped with a back draft damper, also clothes dryer exhaust ducts shall not extend into or through ducts or plenums. Route the dryer ducts directly to the exterior with a back draft damper. (IMC 504.4) Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by showing the backdraft damper. The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 238. The Laundry Layout, page LA1.2, indicates a flue pipe for the dry cleaner in room #317. Add the flue and the 2 hour chase to the architectural sheets and to the mechanical sheets, clarify that it does not pass through a plenum. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.03.1 to show dry cleaning machine exhaust fan EF-8 and ducted connection to outdoors. M2.03.1 - The termination is shown with a 22" sub-duct within the garage exhaust duct. This is not to the exterior as required per IMC 502.7.3.6. The review team also is concerned that when the garage exhaust is not operating the fumes from the dry cleaning can migrate to the garage. Terminate the dry cleaning exhaust to the exterior. Rybka Response: The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors; since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit. The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously. Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's. 244. Add a 2 hour shaft below and proper opening protection for the duct designated as 24x14 S/A F/A-24x12 S/A T/B on page M2.08.1 on grid line l0A and between 10.5111. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1 and relocated the duct riser to the protected shaft in the North West corner of the Maids Room G-811. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by properly coordinating the duct offset/riser transfer shown at this level with rated shaft location or rating requirements. These two ducts that transition between shafts that are not aligned between the 8th and 9th floor levels are both to be shown enclosed in a 2 hour rated drywall enclosure, negating the need for combination fire smoke dampers, except where duct connections penetrate the shaft wall (one location). The duct on this level is indicating 24x14 S/A(supply air) F/A(from above). The 9th floor level or the enlarged M4.06 does not show this duct. Please clarify. 245. Add a 2 hour shaft or designate a fire damper for the 28x10 and the 28x14 as it passes through a 2 hour floor/ceiling assembly into the mechanical room above. On page M2.08.1 between grid lines 10.5 /11 and A8.2/A9.9. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1. See comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that ducts that rise vertically through the building that are protected with two hour fire rated enclosures and are connected to a 2 hour rated mechanical room at the highest level do not have a fire damper at the floor penetration of the mechanical room. Rybka submits that the 2 hour rated shaft enclosure is an extension of the 2 hour rating of the mechanical room fire rated enclosure. There is a 24x10 duct shown penetrating the shaft connecting to the 28x10 duct within the shaft. Add the S/F damper at this location. (The architectural overlays indicate a shaft too small to house the duct?) There is a 24x18 duct shown in this vicinity penetrating the floor/ceiling above. Please address with a fire damper. 246. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 8x 10 duct on page M2.07.2 between grid lines A8.2/A9.9 and 10/10.5. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1. The duct has not been addressed on all levels also see comment #215, smoke/fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft. Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by coordinating the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7, 8, 9 and 10 and attic levels (Sheets M2.07.2, M2.08.2, M2.09.2, M2.10.2 and M2.11.1). Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft wall (one location each occupied floor). The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands, the duct in question has been changed to 12x18 on the 7th level. 247. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 12x6 duct on page M2.07.1 between grid lines A6/A7 and on grid line 4.2. Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1, M2.08.1, M209.1. This duct serving the elevator lobbies has not been addressed. Rybka Response: Rybka will coordinate the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7 in this location with level above and below. Rybka will correct this by rerouting existing ductwork through rated risers provided by HGA in these locations and Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft . The same issue as response to #246. The response is indicting that fire/smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands. The supply duct from level 11 to 10 has no shaft, the duct runs horizontally on the 9th level with no shaft and runs to the 7th level with fire dampers at the floors of the 8th and 9th. This duct requires a shaft. 264. Fire dampers and rated shafts for ductwork through floor/ceiling assemblies are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Refer to response to comment 215 Here are some floor penetrations by ducts that have not been addressed, please evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. M2.03.1 - 12x20 duct, grid lines A4.6 and 2.7/3 The duct in question has changed to 20x 16. The vertical and horizontal shafts need to be shown on the architectural sheets. M2.03.1 - 18x14 duct, grid lines A12 and 3.3/4 The horizontal shaft shown on M2.02.1 is not shown on the architectural sheets. M2.04.1 - 16x10 duct, grid lines A13 and 3.3/4 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.1 1) M2.04 - 12x6 duct, grid lines A10/AI I and 10.5/11 A fire damper has been added to the 2 floors above. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. M2.04 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10/AI I and 10.5/11 This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. The duct is connecting more than 2 stories below the shaft. M2.04 - 6x12 duct, grid lines A10 and 10.5 The drawings have been changed to add fire dampers at the floor line. This duct connects more than 2 stories, a shaft is required. M2.05 - 26x14 R/A, grid lines A6/A7 and 5 A fire damper is required at the floor between the 5th and 6th level. M2.05 - 12x12 paint shop exhaust, 12x12 carpenter exhaust and a 24x12 sanitary duct, grid lines A4.6 and 4/5. These ducts traverse from what appears to be a rated shaft from below through the Resid. Club Concierge Desk (512) room up through the ceiling with no protection. This duct enters a shaft on this level, add a fire damper to the duct as it enters the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11) M2.05 - 6x6, 8x6, (2)12x6 and 10x20 ducts, grid lines A10 and 10/10.5 M2.05 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10 and 10.5111 Review on duct penetrations through the floors has been stopped. The plans examiner's function is not to make a punch list for the design team. Evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6. Rybka Response: Rybka submits that fire dampers, rated shafts and combination fire smoke dampers have been added to the floor plans in general conformance with requirements of the plan reviewer. Additional damper, combination fir dampers and shaft wall construction will be required where this drawing revision has not correctly identified that they are required. Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical responses on the architectural drawings. Structural Conditions- The conditions listed are taken from the last comment letter dated 07/18/2007. The open issues are listed in Red. S106 F 9,11,14/S6.01E Sheet S2.03.2: 12 ft. cantilever retaining wall extension of exterior two span wall below, outside of ballroom areaway on line A 11 between 14 and 14.5 has not been checked and appears to be overstressed for flexure, please check. Consider moment resisting joints at slab to wall connections. Design / detail planter wall. These details require rebar and splices to be shown for proper detailing and construction. Verify cantilever deflection. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. silo F S2.02.4 No calculations have been provided for the cantilevered retaining wall around the pool structure, or on gridline D1. Verify lateral load capacity, consider pedestrian surcharge and water surcharge due to site drains behind this wall as appropriate. Verify footing width. KL&A 6/26/07: Wall in question between gridlines 6-8.5 south of A] 8 supports roof loads and also is the lateral load path for pool structure loading, and for roof uplift for partially enclosed structures. Wall also is monolithic with Area 3A perimeter building wall. Design is part of EOR's scope, please provide wall designs accounting for support of roof structure. KL&A 8/31/07: Coordinate new retaining wall detail 21/S4.03 with foundations shown on plan, S2.02.4. Verify new steel roof around pool structure will resist lateral soil reaction of 1.0 klf, verify metal deck shear strength and connection to resisting perpendicular retaining walls. S128 GS S2.09.3 Top slab bars l OT3 & l OT6 are shown at line 10.6/A 14. It seems these bars are shown in error as the concrete beam is upturned at this location. Beams south of line A] 2.2 are not identified. Please check. IBC 1603.1. KL&A 6/26/07: Top bars also appear required at gridline A10. S2.09.3 PT profile is incomplete, details are required. KL&A 8/31/07: Top bars are still not shown on plan, please review. S145 LS 1/53.02C Wall thickness is shown as 8 inches. Plan S201.2 indicates a 12" exterior foundation wall, please coordinate. KL&A 6/26/07: Coordinate reinforcing shown on shear wall elevation with 'W2' or'W3' per S2.01.2, it is unclear which wall type controls for soil lateral loading. Wall must span two way due to stair shaft opening, verify designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings, the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type 'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the ballroom area, please review. S164 LS S2.11 Provide detail of roof diaphragm to concrete cores. Provide or indicate detail of steel beams to concrete cores for gravity plus lateral loading, per ASCE 7-02 load combinations. Verify drag loads and chord force detailing at eave framing. Verify diaphragm welding is sufficient for expected shear forces, provide shear and moment diagram at roof deck levels. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7. KL&A 6/26/07: New detail 13/S1.0.5B:Welded studs, thickness and dimensions of embed plate are not defined. Please provide this information for all beams and reaction conditions on the drawings. Verify connection is adequate with short slot or long slot holes in the shear tab, if permitted for erection. Provide roof diaphragm calculations per original comment. IBC 1911, 1912, 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. 5165 LS S2.11 Provide detail of concrete diaphragm to concrete cores, verify shear transfer at each level and comment whether any drags are required. Verify if typical details 12 & 23/S 1.0.3A apply throughout the job. ASCE 7-02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S169 LS S3.02A Calculations show a significant force reversal / back-stay effect from Level 6 to Level 5 shear force, i.e. SW 14 & SW 16. Verify this load path has been designed for the loads per 3D analysis. Verify soil plus wind / seismic loading has been used for drag design. Note per plan, S2.05.1, a large hole exists adjacent to wall SW 16, and per calculations page 536, (38+57)=95k shear transfer is required. No drags are shown on plan. Please verify. Note, elevations S3.02A show #5 @ 14" o.c. at upper levels, calculations shown (2) 45 @ 24" o.c., please verify designs match calculations. IBC 1616.1.1, IBC 1604.4. KL&A 6/26/07: Original comment calculated (38+57)=95k load for SW14 not SWI6 as noted, however collector bars have not been added for SW 14. SW 16 collector load is (86+143)=229k, (4) #7 shown on plan are not adequate for 229k, please review all collector designs. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S171 S2.11.1-2, etc. Roof framing plans are incomplete. Please address the following and confirm detailing will be provided in future drawings issues, per IBC 1604.2, 2205.1. a) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed b) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed c) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed d) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed e) KL&A 8/31/07: Closed 0 KL&A 8/31/07: Closed g) W8 & W 16 eave supports do not cantilever outwards and support eave in RAM analysis submitted, instead all load is transferred directly to columns via eave rim beam. Verify eave supports and perimeter girders are adequately sized KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. h) S2.09.3, etc: HSS6x6 to W8, W14 moment connection at eave needs a detail KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. i) I /S2.10.3: W 16x31 on line A 10.5 is shown as WI 805 per calculations, please verify all beams match calculations. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S172 I /S2.08.3 W 18x46 eave support girder near gridlines CB-C I is shown as W21 x44 per calculations; W1400 on line BE is shown as W2lx48 per calculations. Several cantilevered eave moment connection supports are shown without a backspan member. Please review. IBC 2205.1. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 1/S2.08.3 Verify lateral support of the low roof structure for wind and seismic loading; low roof section is not connected to Level 8 PT slab beyond or core walls within the roof area, and braced frames are not shown. Similar at 2/S2.08.3 and other low roof structures. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S173 11,26,28/S7.01 A Calculations indicate that roof deck is attached to slab edge along line 2 and other locations where deck and floor slab are near the same elevation. Provide a detail for lateral roof to slab connection where required by lateral analysis. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S174 52.11.1, etc Show roof diaphragm to concrete core connection, consider in-plane collector shear forces and out of plane anchorage forces. IBC 1604.8.2; ASCE 7, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.8. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. S175 S2.11.1 Verify diaphragm continuity at dormers line A5 between upper roof deck and lower roof deck, provide collectors as required for in plane shear and out of plane shear. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. 5176 S2.09.2 Roof ridge support columns nearl 5.5-A4.8 shown on S2.11.2 are not supported by slab below, please check. IBC 1604.4. KL&A 8/31/07: Column in question is 20 feet tall, verify HSS5x5 is adequate, per S2.11.2. S178 A2.11.1 R, etc. Structural roof plans do not incorporate snow fences shown on architectural drawings. Please provide snow fence with adequate structural connection shear and moment associated with sliding snow. IBC 1608. KL&A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing. KL&A 8/31/07: COMMENTS ON NEW DETAILS FOLLOW 5187 21/54.03 Minimum depth shall be 48" for frost depth requirement. IBC 1805.2.1. Verify wall vertical rebar is adequately developed at top of footing, ACI 318, 12.2. Appears that variables D and D' are reversed with calculations variables hf and hp, please review. IBC 1806. S188 S5.03 Revised beams 4138 & 4139 appear too shallow to support one way slab at ramp. Shear ties are spaced greater than d/2. Please review beam sizes for ramp loads. IBC 1604.2. Planning Department Conditions- From: Warren Cambell Submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval prior to requesting a TCO. Public Works Conditions- From: Chad Salli, Project Engineer 1. Install snowmelt in loading dock dwy. Sheet M5.15 not in resubmittal package, Sheet M5.14 shows heat in the southern half of the dwy. The dwy should be heated from the back of pan along the Frontage Rd to the trench drain. 2. The fountain entry feature shall not be public right-of-way, please remove from right-of-way. 3. The two tier retaining wall shall be designed/stamped by a Colorado registered professional engineer, greater than 4' in height from the top of wall to the bottom of the foundation. 4. Provide Final Drainage report including hydrology and hydraulic analyses (Box culvert, Storm pipe, inlets, swales, etc...). This shall include storm sewer profiles with HGL shown. A 100 yr analysis shall be completed showing no private/public property damage as a result. Provide capacity analysis for major swales and all inlets. The SCS method may be used for large mountain basins, the Rational method shall be used for the smaller site and developed basins. 5. A Developer Improvement Agreement will be required prior to release of permit. 6. Show proposed location for Comcast fiber line along the west property line. Frontage Road/Vail Road 1. Town of Vail Street lights shall be placed at 50' spacings along the project limits. Coordinate with TOV electricians for electric meter location. Relocate private lighting to private property. 2. Set back (detach) the frontage rd sidewalk 6' from back of curb east of the porte cochere exit. Sod shall be installed between the curb and walk. 3. Use attached sidewalk detail for sidewalks located within the right-of-way. 4. Use TY 13 curb inlets vs TY R where the sidewalk is attached to the curb. 5. If necessary, raise Spraddle Creek vault #1 manhole to finished grade. 6. The cross-walk at the roundabout shall be asphalt thru the travel lanes and concrete only across the median. 7. Use CDOT TY 3A curb ramps at the roundabout, 6' width at the throat. 8. Storm line A shall be at 1% minimum slope. Leaving the existing proposed invert elev at TY R inlet 3 and working upstream at 1% appears to still allow for a min of 2' cover at the existing inlet on the north side of the frontage road. 9. Sheet E1.00, please turn off extra curb&gutter alignment. 10. Install 24" conduits to medians for irrigation and 34" conduits to the west median for future use. Spraddle Creek Drainage I . Per previous agreement with the Town, Four-Seasons is responsible for the construction cost of continuing Spraddle Creek to STA 4+40. 2. Install an impermeable membrane around the RCP/CBC due to proposed landscaping and irrigation. 3. Please provide additional detail of proposed walls along the RCP/CBC alignment. Construction of these walls shall be designed so as not to disturb/undermine the RCP/CBC. W Meadow Drive I . Final approval of the West Meadow Drive construction drawings will be completed in conjunction with the Town of Vail design. Modifications to tie-in grades on the Four Seasons site may be necessary to accommodate this final design. W Meadow plans shall also develop streetscape related items in the right-of-way (street lighting, landscaping, etc). 2. Storm line G alignment needs to be revised. There is not enough room to install between Spraddle Creek and a large tree on the south side of W Meadow that shall be protected. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. 3. Storm line E appears to in conflict with the recently installed water line. Will finalize with W Meadow plans. Landscaping/Irrigation 1. Detailed landscaping comments to follow within the next couple of weeks. 2. Coordinate irrigation with TOV irrigation supervisor for final head type/location and water source. 3. The Town is currently in talks with CDOT on permissible landscaping within CDOT right-of-way. Fire Department Conditions- 1. LSR, MOU's and Administrative Modifications must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protection Engineer of record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not accepted. RJA allegedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence has not been presented. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans is not accepted. 5. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additional review. SAFE builtinc. Building Department Services June 09, 2008 George Ruther Community Development Director, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: PROJECT: 4 Seasons, Bulletins 1,2,3,4,6,12,13,17 and 20 PERMIT NUMBER: B06-0196 REVISION NUMBER: 14/15/16 INTERNAL REF 6685/6687/7744 ADDRESS: 1 Vail Road Dear Mr. Ruther: SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Building Code as adopted by the Town of Vail. SAFEbuilt Colorado finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction. Plans: Structural Slab Drawings Architectural Slab Drawings Electrical Drawings Unit Drawings Specification Sheets Door schedule There are still multiple issues pending from the "Conditions of Approval" regarding the original full building permit that have not been addressed at this point in time. Approval of this portion does not alleviate the design team from addressing these conditions. Plan review fee: $720.00 No additional square footage- No added valuation Sincerely, John Plano Plans Examiner SAFEbuilt Colorado john.plano a,SAFEbuilt.com John King Building Official SAFEbuilt Colorado jolul.kin~r(a SAFEbuilt.com SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avi Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-179 0 1 96Revl4,15,16 FAL.doc elof l TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R080001243 Amount: $1,200.00 07/24/200802:29 PM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: DDG Notation: Mark Reed - credit card Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 158,507.90 This Payment: $1,200.00 Total ALL Pmts: 158,507.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300, PLAN CK - project GFP012 1,200.00 SAFEbu`iknc July 8, 2008 Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: Bulletins # 10, 25, 29, 31, 35, 40 PROJECT: Four seasons PERMIT NUMBER: B06-0196 REV. 19 INTERNAL REF 7989 ADDRESS: One Vail road Dear Mr. Haeberle, (-01 O~3 ADO Building Department Services SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed the documents to review in accordance with the International Codes as adopted by the Town of Vail. Safebuilt Colorado finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction. Bulletins # 10, 29, 40 - Two full size sets each with wet seal and signature. Bulletins # 25, 31, 35 - Two sets each of 8-1/2" x 11" with wet seal and signature. 8 hours of plan review due, $480.00 Sinc , ~l Derek Place, Plans Examiner / Inspector derek place Ca SAFEbuilt.com Page 1 of 1 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓\\EAGLEI\Eagle Shared Drive\Plan Review\Vail\4 Season s\tov B06 0196 rev 19FAL.doc = ~oll(.0~08 0 TOWS! ONEIL APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIGNED Building Permit 970-479-2149 (Inspections) REVISION TO TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING PERMIT Separate Permits are required for electrical, plumbing, mechanical, etc.! 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 ***All Revision submittals must include the Field Set of approved plans. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION /'0. - -4 ) II ATTENTION: JOE, JR, CHARLIE, GREG, CHRIS PLETE REVISIONS EVALUATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMIT (I_ahnr P. Matprinkl REVISED AMOUNT: $ ELECTRICAL: $ OTHER: $ PLUMBING: $ MECHANICAL: $ REVISED TOTAL For Parcel # Contact Eagle Countv Assessors Office at 970-328-8640 nr vicif imAAA1 Parma-cnifnfii t-nm Parcel # Job Name: Job Address: ct INck Legal Description Lot: Block: Filing: Subdivision: Owners Name: Address: Phone: Arch itect/Designer: Address: Phone: Engineer: Address: Phone: REASON FOR REVISIONS: 2 I} 3 ~v Work Class: New( ) Addition( ) Remodel ( ) Repair ( ) Demo ( ) Other ( ) Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Both ( ) Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes( ) No( ) Type of Bldg.: Single-family( ) Two-family( ) Multi-family( ) Commercial( ) Restaurant( ) Other ( ) No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: No. of Accommodation Units in this building: No/Type of Fireplaces Existin : Gas Appliances Gas Los Wood/Pellet Wood Burning No/Type of Fireplaces Proposed: Gas Appliances Gas Los Wood/Pellet Wood Burning NOT ALLOWED Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes ( ) No( ) Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes ( ) No ( ) L\ t k***********************FO R OFFICE USE ONLY********************************************* Date Received: Accepted By: Permit Fee (10): Permit Fee (11): Plan Ck Fee (80): Plan Ck Fee (81): *sourced Terms: L'MS\Permits\Building\building_revision_4-18-2007.doc Page 1 of 1 4/18/2007 HKS HILL GLAZIER STUDIO BULLETIN 6E C E I V E D JUN 0 3 2008 HKS HILL GLA'ZiER STUDIO PROJECT: Four Seasons Resort at Vail ARCHITECT'S Vail, Colorado BULLETIN 025 OWNER: Black Diamond Resorts DATE OF 50 South Sixth St., Suite 1480 ISSUANCE: 03/24/08 Minneapolis, MN 55402 V E i (612) 313-0123 >uhje,t to i;Ispection and Compliance to all _:,vant Adopted Building and Municipal Codes. ARCHITECT: HKS Inc, Changes in Plans MUST b ap roved. Hill Glazier Studio 925 Alma Street d 4U Date '7 8 6 By Palo Alto, CA Code: ZDID~3 94301 SAF=_,uilt Coloradn__ _ PROJECT 11247 / 02028 Description: Item #1 - Plumbing and electrical connections to swim suit dryers in Spa -Refer to attached Mechanical Change Notice #6 (including sketches 15-128 and 15-129) and Electrical Change Notice #9 (including sketch 16-29 and panel schedule). Item #2 - Pool deck area drainage - Plumbing revisions to relocate and add pool deck area drains and piping . Refer to attached Mechanical Change Notice #7 (including sketches 15-131 through 15- 138). Attachments: (List attached documents that support description) Mechanical Change Notice #6, prepared by MMM, dated 03/19/08, 3 pages. Includes sketches 15- 128 and 15- 129 (both dated 3/19/08). Mechanical Change Notice #7, prepared by MMM, dated 03/20/08. 9 pages. Includes sketches 15-131 through 15-138 (all dated 3/20/08). Electrical Change Notice #9, prepared by MMM, dated 03/19/08, 4 pages. Includes sketch 16-33 and 2 pages of panel schedule (all dated 3/19/08). End of Bulletin I~ o~ REVIEWED BY JUL 0 8 2008 SAFEbuilt Colorado IA'l OFFICE COPY 7985 4w,iy << 4- 37389 7 3124108 1"` MMM GROUP Refer to attached drawings 15-128 and 15-129. Mr. Michael Perkins Hill Glazier Studio 1 Vail Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Project: Vail Colorado - Four Seasons Hotels and Mechanical Change Notice No. 6 Revision: Issue Date : Wednesday, March 19, 2008 Project Number: 1807286-000 The following items are proposed changes to the contract for this project. Unless noted below, work is not to proceed until authorized by a change order. All material and workmanship are to be described in the contract documents unless otherwise stated. Please submit an itemized quotation for changes to the contract value and/or to the project schedule. Title: Plumbing services for swimsuit dryer Reason for Change: ENGINEER This Mechanical Change Notice is being issued to provide services to 'Swimsuit Dryers'. 2. Provide waste to service dryers as shown. 3. Connect drains as shown to drainage system. 4. Provide all materials and labour required. End of Change Notice R. Rodgers MMM Group Ltd. REVIEWED BY JUL 0 8 2009 SAFEbuilt Colorado Mechanical Change Notice MMM Group Limited - Consulting Engineers 18 Champlain Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3H 2Z1 Bus: 416-398-6020 Fax: 416-398-6361 Night Line: 416-398-6090 Website: www.mmm.ca ,-UP 3' J. i' r-ON 4' UP 2' TO ITEM 483 UP 4' TO FS-,, I PO TOP 57a-10-1/ 11UP d" UP 407 &'X 3-UP 3' P 3' TO FD _N. 4'-.' TO f➢ -rte 3, V 6. 3._~....~.~>.ara.~~>_~a,. _ - SAN ' SAN 1 ' 4' 3' 3' 3 1 R£AD THS DWG W CONXNCTiDN 'MTH DRAtNNG JP2.01.1 3 WCN-6 WA" 19, 2008 State 1j8 =1 -o`~ FDRAIWING Seasons Hotel & Resort 19a 2008 . ~ ate 7:XN ,~`r ♦ $mm M M M G R Q U P LEVEL 1 AREA 1 PLUMBING Be`it~d job Number 1807286-00 Drawing C, A r, r, Number 15-129 A& M M G U Michael Perkin Hill Glazier Studio 1 Vail Road Vail Colorado 81657 970-476-7849 Project: VAIL COLORADO - Four Seasons Hotels & Resorts 1 Vail Rd, Vail CO Electrical Change Notice Electrical Change Notice No. Revision: Issue Date : Project Number: 9 Wednesday, March 19, 2008 1807286-000 The following items are proposed changes to the contract for this project. Unless noted below, work is not to proceed until authorized by a change order. All material and workmanship are to be described in the contract documents unless otherwise stated. Please submit an itemized quotation for changes to the contract value and/or to the project schedule. Title: Swim suit dryer Reason for Change: The purpose of this electrical change notice is to coordinate with the swim suit dryer locations with interior design: 1.0 Drawing E2.02.1 (sketch 16-29) 1.1 Delete receptacle in the Men's locker 250B as shown on drawing. 1.2 Provide GFI connection to swim suit dryer in Men's Locker 250C as shown on drawing. 1.3 Provide GF1 connection to swim suit dryer in Women's Locker 266A as shown on drawing. 2.0 General 2.1 Panel Schedule PSPB reissued for clarification. REVIE- QED BY JUL G 8 2CC9 cc: Inspection - Rybka Smith & Ginsler Limited Rybka, Smith & Ginsler Limited - Consulting Engineers 18 Champlain Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3H 2Z1 Bus: 416-398-6020 Fax: 416-398-6361 Night Line: 416-398-6090 E-mail: info@rybka.com Website: www.rybka.com I SAFEbuilt Colorado L i_._~:_~i _ - ~ -._.r.r i_r~ _ U ;l z cn m 1 T t D o - T U ' 0 - 0 l u m U r r 7 r r r r r r r D m m m D < 0 cn C~ cD C) 2 L7 _ n n C U U -U T T x D D D O CD N a ~ z m m ~ cn to w K O j 0 -j j j 0 0 m o 0 m Z C? o -4 < m m > Z z G7 co m c ~ c -i c ~ m m -4 m D 0 0 r Dr r C n 3 l m ;U -0 D z ? N N ~ z T O r m m cu ;U < ;U X CO m v 1 O v o O 0 v m m O CD o *a z c m v (n U) CD N W A A A 1 C77 1 m 0 c c m (D :3 o a r m Q Q Q D_ D O ~1 OO _ CT O _ O N N N N N N O 0 O O O O O O O p D v N Z Z 0 0 O N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m a) 0 ~p C > T m m m 3k Vl N N + + v X U) D 0 G) G) ~ co < w w Q A A CD C7 6 D U) r a r 0 cn T r W 0 c A x x 3 T D = W O m O n D ° - i a z c „ D s n o ~ ~ o v mm w m N m x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x D x x Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix REVItti'~c 3 Jul- G 8 [c~3 SAFEbuilt Colorado m O r0 o D m T ;0 m m o M N I L L ?1 O D 03 0 0 O m o D O D v v' m v _ m 0 0 r z L W = D o o _ c a o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 O D -p O OO OO O OO o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 v Z D m O O w A GP N N W N N N A r U m n co Z r D < m N O C D D D D < D O O ~ D m CD x T T Z C p ~ D (n U! i~: UT ;u m cn y r N ( 55 c n c n m > D O ri { O ? OM O N p m n D Z m - 0 O T M v n n T Z q D D m o m D D C Q D 2 Z n m n m m m m D D CL A D Z D N C Z N O m -a 0 D i Z Z r C_ C7 3 m m . Z D r m 22 N 0 y D ~ m 0 N O p r O Z Q CD DD ( m N ~ (n (n (D W N N N T - FT W W 0 C = cu O r m 0 Qr CL D D D < O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 rn ° O D O m Z Z A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C7 - m a) CD C O T m v Q N m m j v z o ` + m O S O Cr D N o .n co W - A ~ CD W n D r W r , m _ ib m I G) - C) x Di D c = O D mm m O N D O = N a zz c " N m 0 O z o Z M D N m x x x x x x x x x x x X X x x X x x o x ~ X ~ r C-) O i z z m O 0 m 0 mm O O m m O p DZI m Nbc.!a REVIEWED x Ix Ix Ix Ix W 0 I ITT ~D~\DI D N N -D u -n r, k' + + W + p m D 0 O W a C) W ? n n O o ° C) N o ° 0 r O D Z T 0 D D n rn W -o D 0 m 0 v D 0 m N m D n rn 0 v D C7 m -1 N cf) ;d > ;d o m 56 D m JUL 0 8 SAFEbullt Colorado ti. X"` MMM GROUP Mr. Michael Perkins Hill Glazier Studio 1 Vail Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Project: Vail Colorado - Four Seasons Hotels and Mechanical Change Notice Mechanical Change Notice No. Revision: Issue Date : Thursday, March 20, 2008 Project Number: 1807286-000 The following items are proposed changes to the contract for this project. Unless noted below, work is not to proceed until authorized by a change order. All material and workmanship are to be described in the contract documents unless otherwise stated. Please submit an itemized quotation for changes to the contract value and/or to the project schedule. Title: Pool Deck Area Drainaae Reason for Change: This mechanical change notice is being issued to relocate and provide additional pool area deck drains as per Bulletin #23. Provide drains and piping as shown on 15-131,132,133,134,135,136,137 & 138. REVIEWED BY JUL 0 8 2008 SAFEbuilt Colorado 2. Provide all material and labour required to provide a complete installation as shown. END OF MECHANICAL CHANGE NOTICE R. Rodgers MMM Group Ltd. MMM Group Limited - Consulting Engineers 18 Champlain Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M31-1 2Z1 Bus: 416-398-6020 Fax: 416-398-6361 Night Line: 416-398-6090 Website: www.mmm.ca UP TO DD (TYPICAL) Ir 4' T 1r- 4' 6' r 4' N 4' 6' 6' 4' r4. 8, i Ln 4` I UP 3' TO DRAIN WITHIN TRENCH ASSEMBLY I~- 3' 4' q I 4' r 4' A 4' UP 3' TO DRAIN WITHIN TRENCH ASSEMBLY READ THIS DWG. IN CONJUNCTION WITH DRAWING #P2.01.4 4 MCN-7 MARCH 20, 2008 JOB Four----S easons Hotel & -R e-sort Scale 1/8'=1,-0' Calorad© Vail Date MARCH 20, 2008 , NG TITLE Drawn KN DRAWI MMM GROUP LEVEL I - AREA 4 PLO MBING Checked KN RyEk . Oln slur Llm ic~0 b111h S By J Lan~ulciny Enp...... Job a Number 1807286-00 Drawing 15-131 Number I 4' 4 v I 4. 4,1 I ~ i I I"o ACE I I I I I Q k4' I PIPING 4' 4- 4' 4' 4' A 4' UP (T' IIr 4' READ THIS M. IN CONJUNCTION WITH DRAWING ,yP2.01.4 4 MCN-7 JOB F Resort Hotel & sons S Scale 7 r _ our.-.-._ . .ea Date MARCH20, - - _ Drawn KN DRAWING TITLE N D MMM GROUP - AR LEVEL 1'' PLIMBI1G 4 EA Checked KN WyEY•, 6mlch 6 Gln•lar tim,t.d . . . . Gan.ultf np Enpin.•r• Job 19 Ch am,P,n N ber 1807286-00 um Drnwin g Number 15-132 r 1 4. A 4~~ I 4' 4' O-~J c~ \ 4~ 4' UP 3' TO FD. I 4' 4' o-- UP 2' \-UP 3' TO FD UP 3- 0 FD UP 2' 4' 0. 4' 0 BURIED GAS PIPING 6' READ THIS DWG. IN COK)UNCTION WITH DRAWING ,#P2.01.4 4 MCN-7 MARCH 20, 2008 JOB F s Hotel & Resort Scale 1/8"=1'-0' o C of or-a egg- 7 Date MARCH 20, 2008 TITL W E G Brawn KN DRA IN , MMM GROUP LEVEL I - AREA 4 - PL MBI NG Checked gybY.. 9Tich C 61n. 1.r Ylmit.d - Cen.u lcinp Enpf n.. r. Job 0 r. h, 2Z 6 Nur~ber 1807286-00 39 9 502U eleGn on e. Drawin g 15-133 4' 0 ~ 4' ~ 4' 4' UP TO DD (TYPICAL) - 4' UP 3' TO DRAIN WITHIN TRENCH ASSEMBLY 8' 12' 4' 0--4 ---A READ THIS DWG. IN CONJUNCTION MATH DRAWING ,JP2.01.4 4 MCN-7 9 MARCH 20, 2008 JOB Four Seasons Hotel & Resort Scale 1/8n=1,-0' _ " - ~l~or a d o Vail Date MARCH 20, 2008 , • AN N& [ TIT E rawn D KN _ ! r-- L B MMM GROUP LEVEL P UM~ING 1 AREA 4 - L Checked KN NYbY fmi[h i Gln[Lr Li mi[[e i C l i E , , . n..r• n..~ [ .y ny Job Number 1807286-00 Drawin g Number 15-134 ! G ~DD ~D 6' I DDj DD CIDD I I f ~ 1 i E f ` I 3 I i ®DD ~ I GAS SUP TO FIRE LY ® DD J 1 . RWL UP 4' ®DD "`4-DN 3/4- 4 ODD J DD REFER TO POO' FOR INFORMATi DD ® DD GR# R2 IAN N NOTE: READ THIS DWG. IN CONJUNCTION WITH ORAWNG JP2.02.4 4 MCN-7 MARCH 20. 2008 JOB F Seasons Hotel & Resort Scale ,te•=r-~ our Co orQdo ait Date MARCH 20. 2008 _ , ANN& DRAWING TI E i r~v Drawn MMM GROUP - Checked PUMBING LEVEL c AREA 4 - KN n... E ~ 00 7286 - _ c ber Nu 180 - Drawing - 15-136A Number uilt Colorado SAFFhifii+ ® DD DD DD R TO POOL CONSULTANT'S DRAWINGS INFORMATION ON POOL, WHIRLPOOL ETC. _R TO LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT'S WINGS FOR THEIR FINAL LOCATIONS ELEVATIONS OF ALL DRAINS. ® DD 4 DRAIN WITHIN ARCHITECTURAL TRENCH ZURN No, Z-180-G ®DD 1 V_~ ®DD ®DD f READ THIS DWG. IN CONJUNCTION WITH DRAWING JP2.02.4 4 MCN-7 rR2 JOB Four--Seasons Hotel & Resort Sale Vail, Colorado Date MARCH DRAWING TITLE Drawn MMM GROUP 1By pybk., •mi[b E pin.,.r imi[.d LEVEL - , ~R f 4 PLUMBING Checked Can[ul[inp Enpln..r• 286-00 •.a __d 3„„. LNumber 1807 15-138 t.: PROJECT: Four Seasons Resort at Vail Vail, Colorado OWNER: Black Diamond Resorts 50 South Sixth St., Suite 1480 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 313-0123 HKS HILL GLAZIER STUDIO BULLETIN APPROVED Subject to inspection and Compliance to all relevant Adopted Building and Municipal Codes. Chances. in Plans MUST, eApjproved. Date 7 8 0J By Description: SAFEbuilt Colorado RECEIVED JUN 0 3 2008 HKS HILL GLAZIER STUDIO ARCHITECT'S BULLETIN 031 DATE OF ISSUANCE: 04/09/08 ARCHITECT: HKS Inc, Hill Glazier Studio 925 Alma Street Palo Alto, CA 94301 PROJECT 11247 / 02028 Item #1 - Mechanical Site Instruction #22 (prepared by MMM) - Revised piping in Area 3A. Refer to attached sketch #15-139A. Item #2 - Mechanical Site Instruction #23 (prepared by MMM) - Revised list of acceptable manufacturers for Specifications section 15900. Item #3 - Mechanical Change Notice #9 (prepared by MMM) - Gas Service to Residence Club Unit's gas ranges. Refer to attached sketches #15-170 through15-180. This Change Notice is in response to RFI #499. Item #4 - Mechanical Change Notice #10 (prepa in Wet Treatment Rooms #290 and 291. drawings. Attachments: (List attached documents that support description) Mechanical Site Instruction #22, prepared by 4/7/08). sketch 15-139A (dated Mechanical Site Instruction #23, prepared by MMM, dated 04/07108, 1 page, no attachments. Mechanical Change Notice #9, prepared by MMM, dated 04/08/08. Includes sketch 15-170 through 15- 180 (all dated 4/8/08). Q L I C F Mechanical Change Notice #10, prepared by MMM, dated 04109/08, 1 page, End of Bulletin r ~R~f 79~ 9 OFFICE COPY ~v /9 design for floor drains awn on architectural E JUL 4101 SAFEbuilt Colorado O NiS~. Da~m~ls~~ •,O 336 ~~'~FSSIONP XXXX MMM GROUP Mechanical Site Mr. Michael Perkins Site Instruction No: 22 Hill Glazier Studio 1 Vail Road Issue Date : Monday, April 07, 2008 Vail, Colorado 81657 Project 1$07266-000 Project: Vail Colorado - Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts Site Instructions are issued only for the purpose of recording any clarification or interpretation of the contract document or giving direction on problems resulting from field conditions. These instructions are subject to the provisions of the contract and will not affect the contract. Should the Contractor require a change in the contract price or time, he shall advise the Architect within seven days of receipt of this instruction. Sanitary Drainage Piping in Area 3A Revised Revisions to sanitary drain to accommodate structure. I. Rework sanitary drainage as shown on attached sketch 15-139. 2. Provide all materials and lahn„r to rmmnlatP the xx-rt- END OF SITE INSTRUCTION R.Rodget s- MMM Group Ltd. cc: Inspection - MMM Group MMM Group - Consulting Engineers 18 Champlain Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M31-1 2Z1 Bus: 416-398-6020 Fax: 416-398-6361 Night Line: 416-398-6090 u'lmecnl2rsgmsil stm REM,", BY JLI 0 8 2008 SAFEbuilt Colorado SAFFb+uilt Colorado XXXX MMMCRouP Mechanical Site Instruction Mr. Michael Perkins Site Instruction No: 23 Hill Glazier Studio 1 Vail Road Issue Date : Monday, April 07, 2008 Vail, Colorado 81657 Project 18072$6-000 Project: Vail Colorado - Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts Site Instructions are issued only for the purpose of recording any clarification or interpretation of the contract document or giving direction on problems resulting from field conditions. These instructions are subject to the provisions of the contract and will not affect the contract. Should the Contractor require a change in the contract price or time, he shall advise the Architect within seven days of receipt of this instruction. Upgrade acceptable manufacturers list Revise specification sections as follows to include the manufacturers noted in the 'acceptable alternates list': Section 15900-2.0113 control components and systems manufacturer: include Andover Controls Systems. 2. Section 15900-2.02J damper operator manufacturers: include TAC Systems. 3. Section 15900-2.03F valve manufacturers: include TAC Systems. 4. Section 15900-2.03G valave actuator manufacturers: include TAC Systems. R.Roda MMM Group Ltd. cc: Inspection - MMM Group END OF SITE INSTRUCTION MMM Group - Consulting Engineers 18 Champlain Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3H 221 Bus: 416-398-6020 Fax: 416-398-6361 Night Line: 416-398-6090 JUL 0 6 2008 L SAFEbuilt Colorado stm 4 XXXX MMM GROUP Mr. Michael Perkins Hill Glazier Studio 1 Vail Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Project: Vail Colorado - Four Seasons Hotels and Mechanical Change Notice Mechanical Change Notice No. Revision: Issue Date : Project Number: 1807286-000 The following items are proposed changes to the contract for this project. Unless noted below, work is not to proceed until authorized by a change order. All material and workmanship are to be described in the contract documents unless otherwise stated. Please submit an itemized quotation for changes to the contract value and/or to the project schedule. Title: Gas Service to Residence Club S rit 's a Rana es Reason for Change: This change notice is being issued in response to RFI - 499. 1. Provide all materials and labour required to complete the gas system as per drawings included in the change notice. 2. Refer to drawings 15 -170 to15 -180 for routing and extent of work in this change notice. END OF MECHANICAL CHANGE NOTICE R. Ro ers MM Group Ltd. REVIEWED BY JUL U 8 2008 9 Tuesday, April 08, 2008 unmCu - wnsuung cngrneers 18 Champlain Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3H 2Z1 SAFEbuilt Colorado Bus: 416-398-6020 Fax: 416-398-6361 Night Line: 416-398-6090 Website: www.mmm.ca 0 4 5 I/2' I l2` 2 ~ i 1l4 J r 8' ' 6' SAN. DN. 6` I I L , FRE THIS DWG. I1 CONJJNCTION W17H DRAWING /PZ02.3 - NCM#9 APRIL 08, 2008 `1"2 Four Seasons Hotel & Resort Scale Vail, Col or a do----- a- VML 08, 2W8 xwxx DRAVING TITLE t Ifram p KN MMM GROUP Ctiecke KN ~r +r~.~n c a_. s. tr~ra.e B LEVEL 2 - AREA 3A - PU MMNG Ca p . Number, ` 1807286-00 Drawing 15-170 Nnb r c - 1 1/2' j 1/2' TO tAVS ~ 1 1/4 2• 1,. -H25 2' 3 ON 1/2' O S WER I h ON 1/ TO SINK ` i 1 /4'„ ON 3 ! 1 1/2" DN 14 READ THIS M. IN CONJUNCTION VATH DRAWING /PZ03.3 11cmjg APRIL 08, 200 JOB Four Seasons Hate( & _Res-or_ t scale ,~e•=,-~~ Val(, Cotorodo r ~ [J Tate APRIL M 2M8 DRAWING TITLE - o Drawn KN - i~ hecJ<ed- - MMM GROUP LEVEL 3 AREA 3A KN ».a.... . a,..o.. B Job 1807286-44 • I Number Drawing 15-172 Nunts r s-- DN 1/2* Tt? E: i 1 PSJ R7 R PSI 1 1/4 • 4 ' # , I ' DN 1/2' TO A 41'; A ON 1/2' TO SINK j r' x r - ~ PR OVIDE ROUGH FOR U/C DI P 4 Q?j R4 U i w TO FIRE PLACE GR~ R3 PSI R17 1 _ - 1 4 1 1/4' I CONNECT 2' HO ; I i 431 { STEAM 6Et_ ---TO PS ' 1 /4' DN 1/2- TO , SHOWER _ DN 1/2' TO SINK F { i f I RWL UP fit; IN 4' I i L 2'0 DCW UP do ON jj t PROM l-~ j FOR raR C . ( . '1 YLIN£ L y SHOWER PSI iS GRj R7 I 9 GR/ R8 READ THIS DWG. IN CONJUNCTION WITH DRAWING /P2.04.3 MCM19 _ APR 2008 e J~ Four Seasons Hotel & Resort V Qil, LotQC'ad o r 2008 11~1 NI M G a U P DR~4WING TITLE r~ o.,, , ~,..p LEVEL 4 AREA 1A i~LMBI G ked t - . f - 1807286-00 er 9 1 - N - er 15-173 4. 4. i A RC 14AI, R4 ON TERMINATE 3/4- REI & DRAIN LINES OVER 1/2- CW TO STEAM GENERATOR i FROM PS UP & ON 4----\ PS/ R8 n- R 3` SUPPLY LINE STEAM SHOWER -PSI R7 77 a 1 ! ; J Mrs GRI WER Li ~ _ CRJft7 PROVIDE ROUGH-IN GR PS 9 R8 I + l FOR U/C DISHWASHER t I P t ~ - r READ THIS DWG. IN CONJUNCTION WITH DRAWING JP7-05.3 mania APRIL 08, 200$ JOB Four Seasons Hotel & Resort Scale - - - Q _ - Cvi or d ly a Date APRIL 08, 2009 ~XX DRAWING TITLE Dram KN MMM GROUP LEVEL 5 - AREA 3A - PL WIN _ Checked . Ax - Job Number 1807286--00 - Drawing ido Nur~ r 15-174 r ► 1 GR Pb UP 3/4` NOTE ALL DRAINS, DCW & DHW PIPING EXPOSED IN LOADING DOCK IS TO BE ELECTRICALLY HEAT TRACED, INSULATED t 1/2•- UP 3/4' TO RANGE t t/4.1 RWL UP 3' I 1 1/4- Z/- 4' 3/4' UP 3/4• TO RANGE RWL UP 4' I UP 4' I. 4- 1/4' "i W READ THIS DWG. IN CONJUNCTION WITH DRAWING #P7-06i.t MCM19 20 JOB Four Sea sons Hotel ~ _ Scaie 1 y a l t , c olorad oc u, - - 20 AAA, I}RAWIhIG TITLE r MMM GROUP LEVEL 6 AREA 11 PLUMBIN , Number -CX3 Drawing 15-T7fi _ Number Imo, P ! DN 1/2' I i 3' 1 1 1 3/4" p~FD. 1 I ORAGE I ROOM 3 I 701 A 1 1/2- CW TO STEAM I' - GENERATOR ELECTRICAL j CLOSET 701 3/4-GAS LINE F DOWN : STAIR "A" RWL DN. S- 7G 3' ~N. 3. 1 1/2v 3' 3• 1-1/2' 3" AN -SAN' RS1 GAS UNE I SERV. ELEV. 3" UP 2' 4' NE 1-1/2" DOWN t LOBBY E-702 RS2 F VE 3" CORRIDOR C-703 GR C1 3/4' _ P UP 4' o- 7 05~ DN. o00 READ THIS DWG. IN CONJUNCTION WITH DRAWING IP2.07.1 MCM#9 APRIL 08, 2008 JOB Four Seasons Hotel & Resort Scale 1/8•=1'-0• Dnte APRIL 08, 2008 DRAWING TITLE Drawn MMM GROUP I-- - B KN FybY•, imob = o.,... m,..e LEVEL '7 AREA 1 - PL.UMBI NG checked KN Con. uls lip 6npl...... e s emp:. r, a Job Number 1807286-00 iruuru« d6 i99. e~2C Drawing Numb r 15-178 I f. l UP 4` RWL L `UP 4! LEVEL 8 3/4' }-3/4' LEVEL 7 1/2' Y 1. r 3/4' LEVEL 6 t--1 1/4' r 3/4' 3/4' I 3/4' 3/4' 3/4' 3/4' -1 1/4' PRV 11/4' PRV 1 114' PRV 1 1/4'~ 1 114' J c-11 3/4' L 3/4' L 3/4' 1 1/4' R7 R8 R9 R10 READ THIS DWG. IN CONJUNCTION WITH DRAWING Id MCM/9 tel & _Reser JOB Four Sas7SER I"` VO' c~ DRAWING TITLE i _ MMM GROUP ~7 GA'S IAMW C....ul tlnp Enp~n.... ~B Chemp~ein Bc~ e. rn SAFEbW l t Colorado LEVEL S LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 APRIL 08, 2008 Scale N.T. Date APRIL 08, 2008 Drown By KN Checked B KN Job Number 1807286-00 Drawing Num hPr 15-180 1\\` MMM GROUP Mr. Michael Perkins Hill Glazier Studio 1 Vail Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Mechanical Change Notice Mechanical Change Notice No. 10 Revision: Issue Date : Wednesday, April 09, 2008 Project: Vail Colorado - Four Seasons Hotels and Project Number: 1807286-000 The following items are proposed changes to the contract for this project. Unless noted below, work is not to proceed until authorized by a change order. All material and workmanship are to be described in the contract documents unless otherwise stated. Please submit an itemized quotation for changes to the contract value and/or to the project schedule. Title: Eloor drains add d to W Ma saQ sui'E~s Reason for Change: ENGINEER This change notice is being issued in a response to a request for direction from the mechanical contractor. 1. Provide a 4" floor drain type J.R. Smith #2005A - NB and associated piping in Wet Massage Suites # 1 & 2, rooms 290 & 291. 2. Locate floor drains as per architectural drawings. 3. Contractor shall provide all materials and labour to complete the work within this change notice. i-L/ R. Ro gers MMM Group Ltd. END OF MECHANICAL CHANGE NOTICE REVIEWED BY JUL 0 8 20C:3 L =SAFE=built Colorado MMM Group Limited - Consulting Engineers 18 Champlain Boulevard, Toronto. Ontario M3H 2Z1 Bus: 416-398-6020 Fax: 416-398-6361 Night Line: 416-398-6090 Website: www.mmm.ca J t Four Seasons Resort at Vail Vail, Colorado PROJECT: OWNER: Description: Black Diamond Resorts 50 South Sixth St., Suite 1480 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 313-0123 t:, P D V IC L) Suluioct to inspection and Compliance to all relevant Adopted Building and Municipal Codes. Change I Plans MUST be a roved. Date 7~ a~ By Code: SAFE-built Colorado RECEIVED N 0 3 2008 STUDIO ARCHITECT'S BULLETIN 4: 035 DATE OF ISSUANCE: 04/17108 ARCHITECT: HKS Inc, Hill Glazier Studio 925 Alma Street Palo Alto, CA 94301 PROJECT a: 11247 / 02028 Item #1 - Mechanical Change Notice #13 (prepared by MMM) - Main water softening system. Item #2 - Mechanical Change Notice #14 (prepared by MMM) - Deletion of selected floor drains. Attachments: (List attached documents that support description) End of Bulletin (~4w 0~ OFFICE COPY Am Mechanical Change Notice #13, prepared by MMM, dated 04/17/08. Includes sketches 15-197 and 15- 219 through 15-224 (all dated 4/17/08). Mechanical Change Notice #14, prepared by MMM, dated 04/17/08. Includes sketches 15-225 through 15-227 (all dated 4/17/08). HKS HILL GLAZIER STUDIO BULLETIN REVIEWED BY Jul 0 8 2008 SAFEbuilt Colorado '.o 37389 co: a0 0 14*9 (Tf 1"` MMM GROUP Mechanical Change Notice Mr. Michael Perkins Hill Glazier Studio 1 Vail Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Project: Vail Colorado - Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts Mechanical Change Notice No. Revision: Issue Date : Project Number: 13 Thursday, April 17, 2008 1807286-000 The following items are proposed changes to the contract for this project. Unless noted below, work is not to proceed until authorized by a change order. All material and workmanship are to be described in the contract documents unless otherwise stated. Please submit an itemized quotation for changes to the contract value and/or to the project schedule. Title: Main Water Softening System Reason for Change: This mechanical change notice is being issued in response to owner's request. The Main' water softener shall be a duplex system suitable for continuous flow of 201 gpm and a peak flow of 267 gpm., Culigan model #CSM 750-3.Refer to specification section 15400, Article 2.23 for trim, accessories and control's required as part of the system. The 'Main' water softening system will provide softened water to the make-up for the Cooling Tower, make-up water to 'Steam Boilers' water supply to the Hotel domestic hot water tanks. Refer to drawing 15-219 indicating the location and the piping arrangement for the 'Main' water softener located in the 1 st. level Boiler Room at the Mezzanine Level. 4. Refer to drawings 15-220 thru 15-224 indicating the softened water supply to the cooling tower. 5. Refer to drawing 15-197 indicating the softened water supply to the steam boilers. END OF MECHANICAL CHANCE R.Rodgers MMM Group Ltd. REVIEWED BY JUL 0 8 201M SAFEbuilt Col:)rniln 18 Champlain Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3H 2Z1 Bus: 416-398-6020 Fax: 416-398-6361 Night Line: 416-398-6090 Website: www.mmm.ca rAT_ rl TERMINATE BACK V LINE TO OVER" r q 4! FFD - - t /-4' 4' TO STEAM BOILER MAKE-UP .S ....0 . 3 4''., lrsra. •'A t.______________ INV. 5< DY READ THIS DWG. IN CONJUNCTION NTH DRAYMG J'2.01.3 JOB Four Skcasc Va - X DRAWING TITLEJ IVMMM GROUP 4 b i . . LE~'E~ 1 qLl sttw b ll-.x.d M Cr+ t q C.y .e.: fi tI „ j 'IL I~ 3/a' DRAIN oTR HD 5/8' SUPPLY LINE M STEAM SHOW R r PSI, STAIR 'N" R1 I READ THIS DWG. IN CDNJUNCIM WITH DRAMANG J'2A4,3 MCM-13 APRA. 17, M Jaa Four >ons Motet & Resort scale v8•=1'-0' ©tQr Date APRIL 17, 2DD8 DRAVING TITLE Drawn K.N. MMM GROUP B LEV L - EA PL MBNG Checked R,yY , fete i 4:e.+Y> tw2td Cnn•ui tiny [w~le~era : 1008 J. Number 1807286-00 ~r:FEbuilt C i Draving r -221 15 b--I'Y 4 RX DN 6' ! i !t ! J R1 ON 1 t/4 READ TH{S DWG. IN CONJUNUON PATH DRAYANG JP2.06.3 !.i-13 AML 17, 2W8 JOB Four Sec ns__Hotel & Resort Scale Date APRIL 17, 2 W8 ♦ DRAWING TITLE y _ Drawn K.N. MM GROUP LEVEL - AREA 3 PLUMBING }4 Checked KN Nxa.. sne 4 On sig. Eew raa {~~~-.FJ I _ Job i 1807286-00 Number r Drawing W SA F E b u i Number 15-223 3 SOFT COLD WATER LINE 0 DN 1 1/2" ~J 1 1/2- TO COOLING TOWER Q ° MAKE-UP WATER CONNECTION O RD OVTR ETH O pFF 0 IC3 0 11 0 COOLING TOWER DRAIN 0 a ,H 0 READ THIS DWG. IN CONJUNCTION WITH DRAWING JP2.07.3 IZA MCM-13 APRIL 17, 2008 JOB EOUr SeQS ~c..-Re-stint- Scale 1/8"=1'-0' V I COb(;n tjtli Date APRIL 17, 2008 DRAWING TITLE Drawn K N MMM GROUP B . . 6 1,11, mh i Gln"I"r Li m ic"d LEVEL 7 AREA PWMBIN Checked KN C on. ult inp Eniin..ra B " _ - Job Number 1807286-00 ` SAFEbu11 . Drawing 15-224 Nunber r Mechanical MMM GROUP Change Notice Mr. Michael Perkins Mechanical Change Notice No. 14 Hill Glazier Studio 1 Vail Road Revision: Vail, Colorado 81657 Issue Date : Thursday, April 17, 2008 Project: Project Number: 1807286-000 Vail Colorado - Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts The following items are proposed changes to the contract for this project. Unless noted below, work is not to proceed until authorized by a change order. All material and workmanship are to be described in the contract documents unless otherwise stated. Please submit an itemized quotation for changes to the contract value and/or to the project schedule. Title: Deletion of floor drains Reason for Change: This Mechanical Change Notice is being issued in response to RFI - 0598. 1. Refer to drawings 15-225, 226 &227 included with this mechanical change notice. 2. Delete floor drains, traps and associated piping as shown on drawings. 3. Provide all materials and labour required to complete the work in the change notice. END OF MECHANICAL CHANGE NOTICE R.Rodgers MMM Group Ltd. REVIEWED BY Jul 0 8 2003 SAFEbuilt Colorado MMM Group Limited - Consulting Engineers 18 Champlain Boulevard. Toronto, Ontario M31-1 2Z1 Bus: 416-398-6020 Fax: 416-398-6361 Night Line: 416-398-6090 Website: www.mmm.ca 6' UP 6' TO DRAIN WITHIN TRENCH 3' UP 3' TO FS UP 1 1/2' - 2' 3' TO ITEM #62 UP 2' TO FS 6' 2' P ' IM 4' UP 2' TO l ITEM #83 l UP 3' U 3 F3, SAN 1 DN 1' DN 4' 4' UP 4' TO FS MEN'S MEN'S Q • MEN'S ET LOCKER L(0014 I I UP XOTNERS ' 252C 250C ~~C 3' Cr; 3/4 i 1 UP 4' TO FFD J a1CN S P 1 112' 4' ` ' UNG j 1 1/2' TO ITEM #168 RWL UP G' 247 i = UP 4' t c- I 13/4 ~L J W0 N"S CHA "ING 251 249 LOC R 1 1 112' STANDING WASYC SWIM ~ 4 f SUIT DRYER DRAIN T f{# N. ' REFER TO EQUIPMENT MGWAC URER ~ HNG R 1 -DN 3/4 1 H 6 CWS INSTALLATION DETAIL ~ 264A I` T R ~ TOILET AGE ~ S O ~ ' ` 2528 ~ o ~ ~ 248 / I ~ I~ H W WOMEN'S WOMEN'S i wiEC L ! 2 43 . LOCKER LOCKER 3/ , DN. 4' y 266D 266C l c 3 _ _ l ( ] L I JAN TOILET 268A READ THIS DWG. IN CON,AINCTION WITH DRAWING ,JP2.02.1 mcm-14 APRIL 17, 2008 JOB Four Seas „Hotel „eesort Scale , 0 [6 r~a CI_ Date APRIL 17, 2008 DRAWING TITL 1 ' Brawn K N MMM GROUP . . LEVELS 2 AR~ ;t -``PLUM ING Checked PybY., smlvp c oa., uma.a BY KN M3 - SAFFhui'i C1i°?s , Job Number 1807286-00 C - Drawing NuMber 15-225 r 4 I" fit. R4R /-3'1 r0&Y CHECK 1 j GGPAMO STA R Si AIR `rf READ THIS DMR;. IN C0N VNCTION 'ITN DRAWING #131031 MCM-14 APRIL 17, 2008 JtIH 1-+01 ft I?~ac F OU _ - . , 0r t scale i/8•=1 _0• - - A XXX } IU! f 7Do n APRIL 17. 2008 A A DRAWING T LE K.N. MMM GROUP ' fe"I L MB NG LEVEL ' AREA ~ Eltet'~ KN ■rr.•, ~s.sr z c„+., ti.+a,a V 1 JUkf Number 1807285-00 Drawing Number 15-226 s 344 ~ OFFICE 1 / OFFICE - VESTIBU l' 353A SERVICE - I FFD STATION _ 354 INDUCTION I i 4 TABLE RWL UP 8' --Q 353 N - 8' DN 4' RWL DN 8' RES URANT READ THIS DWG. IN CONJUNCTION WITH DRAWING JP2.03.1 _ MGlL14 APRIL 17, 2008 JOB Four Seaso ns et & Res scale '/e'='_°• Vai C lorado Date APRIL 17, 2008 I,"` DRAWING TITLE . Drawn K N MMM GROUP B . . LEVEL 3 - REA - UM BIN Ci y hecked Nys.. Smith ain. i.n Lim ic.d C.n.ul cinp Enpl n...• i . . . B KN a a Li; 7r-oora o Jab _ Number 1807286-00 Drawing Numb r II 15-227 I a ~t CP 12 14 X0 EXCEPTIONS TAKEN MAKE CORRECTIONS NOTED REVISE AS NOTED AND RESUBMIT CTED / RESUBMIT AS SPECIFIED REVIEWED FOR LOAD TO STRUCTURE ONLY SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY. 4~/8" - Not Reviewed Reviewed, identified additional data only Notations Do Not Authorize Changes To Contract Sum. Submittal was reviewed for structural design conformity and general conformance to contract documents only. Contractor is responsible for confirming and correlating dimensions at job sites for tolerances, clearances, quantities, fabrication processe and techniques of construction, coordination of his work with other trades d full compliance with contract documents. ann l 9 dal! 1/~/{yWa BY NISHKIAN ME NINGER Consulting & Structural Engineers 7TI ONE PIECE TREAD - - FOR ~e TOWN F VA ~ x Town 0i vall MAR 2 0 2000 ITIM: POP APPRO` A MATERIAL = A36 P8062 ONE PL 12 GA X 5 7/8 X 3'- 5 1/2" MARK QTY DESCRIPTION REF. I PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS RESORTS & HOTELS DRN BY: DATE: REVISIONS: DVS 3/2008 PAINT PROD N SEiT N ONE S/C PRIMER 0: 4742 0: P8062 ~c~ 12 14 - ONE PIECE RISER - MATERIAL = A36 P8051 ONE PL 12 GA X 7 11/16 X 3' -5 1/2" I I V V V V LII MARK QTY DESCRIPTION REF. PROJECT: F R OU SEASONS RESORTS & HOTELS DRN BY: DATE: REVISIONS: DVS 3/2008 PAINT ONE S/C PRIMER PROD N0: 4742 SHT N0: P8051 12 14 - ONE PIECE TREAD - MATERIAL = A36 P8053 3 PL 12 GA X 4 3/8 X 3'-5 1/2" 1 vlv v v v ~l l MARK QTY DESCRIPTION REF. 1 PROJEC FOUR T EA SO R 9 J S L..)lll \ I J 0(. HOTELS DRN BY: DATE: REVISIONS: DVS 3/2008 PAINT ONE S/C PRIMER PROJ N0: 4742 SHT N0: P8053 - PLAIN MATERIAL - P8054 4 PL 12 GA X 3 X 0'- 8" MARK QTY DESCRIPTION REF. 1 PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS RESORTS & HOTELS DRN BY: DATE: REVISIONS: 1~VS 3/2008 PAINT ONES C PRIMER TERIAI A36 PROJ N0: 4742 Siff N0: P8054 - Q- 12 1 4 5%6" - ONE PIECE TREAD - MATERIAL = A36 P8055 ONE PL 12 GA X 15 15/16 X 3'-5 1/2" MARK QTY DESCRIPTION REF. I PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS RESORTS & MOTELS 2 DRN BY; DATE: REVISIONS: DVS 3/2008 PAINT ONE S/ C PRINER PROJ N0: 4742 Siff N0: P8055 - 12 - o-- 1 Y4 - ONE PIECE TREAD - MATERIAL = A36 P8056 2 PL 12 GA X 16 1/16 X 3'-5 1/2" MARK QTY DESCRIPTION REF. PROJECT: 1 FOUR SEASONS RESORTS & ROTES 2 DRN BY: DATE: REVISIONS: DVS 3/2008 PAINT PROJ N0 S ONE S/ C PRIMER : 4742 HT N0: P8056 - 12 1Y4 1- 2Y16" - ONE PIECE TREAD - MATERIAL = A36 P8058 ONE PL 12 GA X 24 15/16 X 3'-5 1/2" MARK QTY DESCRIPTION REF. ' PROJE FOU CT: R SEASONS RESORTS & MOTELS 2 / 7 ;;Wffg DRN BY: DATE: REVISIONS: ffv DVS 3 2008 PAINT ONE S/ C PRIMER PROJ N0: 4742 SHT N0: P8058 l C Ln 16 - ONE PIECE RISER - MATERIAL = A36 P805q ONE PL 12 GA X 6 1/2 X 4'- 11 3/8" MARK QTY DESCRIPTION REF. I PROJECT: S FOUR SEASONS RESORTS & HOTE L 2 ~ DRN BY: DA TE: REVISI❑NS1 f rz~~Wg DVS 3Z2008 PAINT ONE S/C PRIMER PROD N0: 4742 SHT N0: P805q _ 12 216 111%6 - ONE PIECE TREAD - MATERIAL = A36 P8060 3 PL 12 GA X 21 1/4 X 4' - 11 3/8" MARK QTY DESCRIPTION REF. PROJECT: I FOUR SEASONS RESORTS & HOTEES DRN BY: DATE: REVISIONS: DVS 3/2008 PAINT ONE S/C PRIMER PROJ N0: 4742 SHT N0: P8060 12 2Y16 11 - ONE PIECE '-0%" 8 TREAD - MATERIAL = A36 P8061 ONE PL 12 GA X 13 1/8 X 4' - 11 3/8" MARK QTY DESCRIPTION REF. ' PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS RESORTS & HOTELS DRN BY: DATE: REVISIONS: DVS 3/2008 PAINT PR ONE S/C PRIMER OJ N0: 4742 SHT N0: P8061 N 12 1% 4%" - ONE PIECE TREAD - MATERIAL = A36 P8062 ONE PL 12 GA X 5 7/8 X 3'- 5 1/2" MARK QTY DESCRIPTION ER W ' PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS RESORTS & HOTELS DRN BY: DATE: REVISIONS L{~~L{~~L~/~ DVS 3/2008 PAINT ONE S/C PRIMER PROJ N0: 4742 SHT NO: P8062 7 r - W. B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL AND RESORT, STAIR `Q' JOB NO: 23771Q ONE VAIL ROAD, VAIL, CO 81657 DATE: 11MAR08 CLIENT : THE DRAFTING SHOPPE SHEET ST1-1 DESIGN : RFM March 11, 2008 SCOPE : STRUCTURAL STAIR AND RAIL CALCULATIONS FOR STAIR `Q', FOUR SEASONS HOTEL AND RESORT, ONE VAIL ROAD, VAIL, CO PER ERECTION DRAWINGS E8050, E8051, & E8052, PREPARED BY JT STEEL., JOB #4742, REVIEWED BY W.B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS INC. ON 03/11/08. ASSUME THE END SUPPORTING STRUCTURE IS SUFFICIENTLY STRONG TO SUPPORT THE STAIR RUNS. THIS CALCULATION DOES NOT INCLUDE ANALYSIS OF THE BUILDING AND THE STAIR SUPPORT STRUCTURE. BUILDING STORY DRIFT WAS NOT CONSIDERED. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW THE ENCLOSED STAIR CALCULATIONS FOR THE GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING, PER INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, 2007 EDITION, SECTION 106.3.4.2 (DEFERRED SUBMITTALS). W.B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. DOES NOT REVIEW STAIR FOR ADA COMPLIANCE. DESIGN CRITERIA: INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, 2007 EDITION MATERIAL: STEEL PLATES AND SHAPES ASTM A-36 Fy = 36 KSI STEEL TUBES ASTM A-500 GR. B Fy = 46 KSI STEEL PIPES ASTM A-53 Fy = 35 KSI BOLTS STEEL CONNECTIONS ASTM A-307 Fu = 60 KSI NORMAL STRENGTH WELDS E70 ELECTRODES Fy O KSI EXISTING CONCRETE (ASSUMED) f c 28 DAYS = ~ 3, MUCEPTIONS TAKEN _ MAKE CORRECTIONS NOTED HILTI KWIK BOLT TZ, ICC ESR-1917, OR EQUAL IN CONCRETE: -REVISE AS NOTED AND RESUBMIT DIAMETER EMBEDMENT T V EJECTED / RESUBMIT AS SPECIFIED 5/8" 4" 3014# 4678# (ASD) ZREVIEIVED FOR LOAD TO STRUCTURE ONLY 3/4" 4 3/4" 3900# 6313# (ASD) _SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY: • Not Reviewed SIMPSON TITEN HD ANCHOR, ICC ESR-1056, OR EQUAL IN CONCRETE: Res;ewed, identified additional data only DIAMETER EMBEDMENT T V Notations Do Not Authorize Changes To Contract Sum. 1/2" 5 3/4" 2270# 2795# (ASD) Submittal was renewed for structural design eonformih acrd general con' TOWN OF VAIL ro 01R 'j A wrmance to contract documents onh. Contractor is responsible for confirming and correlating dimrnsions at job sites for tolerances, clearances, quantities, fabrication processes and techniques of construction, coordination of his work with other trades and full compliance with contract documents. Date y NISHKi kN k, 1, Consulting & Structural Lng;neers z r W. B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL AND RESORT, STAIR `Q' JOB NO: 23771Q ONE VAIL ROAD, VAIL, CO 81657 DATE: 11MAR08 CLIENT THE DRAFTING SHOPPE SHEET ST1-2 DESIGN KFM GRAVITY LOADING: WDL = 40 PSF WDL = 40 PSF WDL = 10 PSF WU = 100 PSF PL,, = 300 LBS CONCRETE & BENT TREAD PLATE CONCRETE & LANDING PLATE STRUCTURAL STEEL STRINGERS DISTRIBUTED LOAD TREADS POINT LOAD SEISMIC LOADING: PER SECTION 1621 Fp = 0.4(ap/Rp)xSDSxIpx(1 +2z1h)xWp ap = 1.0 HORIZONTAL FORCE FACTOR Rp = 2.5 HORIZONTAL FORCE FACTOR Ip = 1.5 LIFE SAFETY COMPONENT Fa = 1.2 SITE CLASS `C' SS = 0.287 SOURCE FACTOR SDS = 2/3 x Fa x SS = 0.230 SEISMIC COEFFICIENT z / h = 1.0 ROOF LEVEL ATTACHMENT Fp = 0.4x(1.0/2.5)x0.230x1.5x(1+2(1.0))xWp 0.166 Wp GOVERNS NOT MORE THAN Fp = 1.6 x 0.230 x 1.5 x Wp 0.552 Wp NOR LESS THAN Fp = 0.3x0.230x 1.5xWp 0.104 Wp GOVERNING SEISMIC LOAD Fp = 0.166 Wp / 1.4 = 0.119 Wp ASD e W. B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL AND RESORT, STAIR `Q' JOB NO: 23771Q ONE VAIL ROAD, VAIL, CO 81657 DATE: 11MAR08 CLIENT : THE DRAFTING SHOPPE SHEET ST1-3 DESIGN : XFM TREADS: CHECK 60" WIDE TREAD (12 GAGE BENT PLATE - SEE SECTION PRINTOUT ST1-4) WDL = 40 PSF x 1.00' = 40 PLF Pu = 300 LBS OR 100 PSF L = 50 IN Sx = 1.866 IN' Fb = 0.6 x 36,000 = 21,600 PSI fb = [40 PLF / 12 x 60"' / 8 + 300 x 60" / 4] / 1.866 IN' = 3,330 PSI fb = [140 PLF / 12 x 60i2 / 8] / 1.866 IN' = 2,820 PSI TREAD TO STRINGER CONNECTION: ATTACH TREADS WITH (5) 1/8" FILLET x 1 1/2" LONG WELDS TO STRINGERS. Rw = 0.707 x 0.125" x 0.3 x 70 KSI = 1,855 # / IN Rp = 0.105"x 0.4x36 KSI = 1,512#/IN G.F. = 1,512 # / IN x 5 x 1 1/2" = 11,340 # OR OK WELD STRENGTH PLATE STRENGTH OK L W.B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. WrB PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL AND RESORT, STAIR JOB NO: 23771Q ONE VAIL ROAD, VAIL, CO 81657 DATE: 11MAROB CLIENT : THE DRAFTING SHOPPE SHEET ST1-4 DESIGN : RFM CFS Version 3.03 Section: Section 1.sct Rev. Date: 04/01/2002 12 GA. TREAD & RISER Rev. Time. 5:27:25 PM W.B. Clausen Strucutrai Engineers, Inc. Rev. By: Phone: 510-655-4144 1727 64th Street Emeryville, CA. 54608 Fax: 510-6155»1133 pkt h@clausenengineers.com Section incuts Material: A36 No strength increase from cold work of forming. Modulus of Elasticity, E 29500 ksi Yield strength, Fy 36 ksi Tensile Strength, Fu 58 ksi warping Constant Override, Cw 0 in^6 Torsion Constant Override, J 0 in^4 Part 1, Thickness 0.1017 in (12 Gage) Placement of Part from Origin: X to center of gravity 0 in Y to center of gravity 0 in Outside dimensions, Open shape Length Angle Radius Web (in) (deg) (in) 1 1.0000 0.000 0.12000 None 2 8.5000 -98.000 0.12000 None 3 1.0000 0.000 0.12000 None k Hole Size Distance Coef. (in) (in) 0.000 0.0000 0.5000 0.000 0.0000 4.2500 0.000 010000 0.5000 Full Section Properties Area 1.0235 in^2 wt. 0.0034800 .k/ft Width 10.064 in Ix 7.8403 in^4 rx 2.7677 in Ixy 0.7268 in''4 SX(t) 1.8660 in^3 ^ y(t) 4.2016 in a -5.322 deg Sx(b) 1.8660 in 3 y(b) 4.2016 in Iy 0.1068 in^4 ry 0.3230 in X0 0.0000 in Sy(1) 0.1754 in^3 x(1) 0.6085 in Yo 0.0000 in Sy(r) 0.1754 in^3 x(r) 0.6085 in jx 0.0000 in 21 7.9080 in^4 ri 2.7796 in jy 0.0000 in 22 0.0390 in^4 r2 0.1953 in Ic 7.9471 in^4 rc 2.7964 in Cw 0.82672 in^6 10 7.9471 in^4 ro 2.7864 in J 0.0035288 in^4 W. B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL AND RESORT, STAIR ONE VAIL ROAD, VAIL, CO 81657 CLIENT : THE DRAFTING SHOPPE DESIGN : RFM CHECK STAIR STRINGER (5.0' WIDE STAIR FLIGHT): CHECK 2.0' RISE x 3.75' RUN -MC 12 x 10.6 STRINGER: JOB NO: 237710 DATE: 11MAR08 SHEET ST1-5 NOTE: 5.0' WIDE STAIR FLIGHT RESISTS LATERAL LOAD FROM LEVEL 2 LANDING APPLIED PERPENDICULAR TO STAIR FLIGHT. LATERAL LOAD PARALLEL TO FLIGHT IS SHARED BY 3 FLIGHTS. STRINGER LOAD: WDL = 50 PSF x (60/12) FT / 2 = 125.0 PLF WLL = 100 PSF x (60/12) FT / 2 = 250.0 PLF WTi = 125.0 PLF + 250.0 PLF = 375.0 PLF CHECK GRAVITY LOADING: M = 375.0 PLF x (3.75 FT)'/ 8 = 660 #-FT fb = 660 #-FT x 12 / 9.23 IN' = 860 PSI - - - - - > OK CHECK SEISMIC LOADING: FpIz-z = 0.119 x 50 PSF x 5.0' x 3.75' = 120 # Fp2z-z = 0.119 x 50 PSF x 3.67'x 13.25' = 290 # Mz-z = 120 # x 3.75'/ 2 + 290 # x (3.75'+ 3.67'/ 2) = 1,850 #-FT Iz-z = [0.382 IN4 + 3.10 IN2 x (60"/2)2] x 2 = 5,580 IN4 Sz-z = 5,580 IN4 / (60"/2) = 180 IN' fbz-z = 1,850 #-FT x 12 / 180 IN' = 130 PSI - - - - - > OK CHECK STRINGER TO LANDING BEAM - CONNECTION #1 (5.0' WIDE STAIR FLIGHT): Rx = 1,850 #-FT / 5.0' = 0.37 KIPS Ry = 375 PLF x 3.75 FT / 2 = 0.70 KIPS Rz = (120 # + 290 / 2 = 0.21 KIPS ATTACH CHANNEL STRINGER TO HEADER BEAM WITH 3/16" FILLET WELD (2) 11/2" HORZ & (2) 4" VERT. Rw = 0.1875" x 0.707 x 0.3 x 70 KSI = 2,780 # / IN WELD STRENGTH Rp = 0.1875" x 0.4 x 36 KSI = 2,700 # / IN PLATE STRENGTH CHECK 3/16" x 1 1/2" LONG HORIZONTAL FILLET WELD FOR SEISMIC G.F. = 2,700 # / IN x 1.5" x 1 WELD = 4.0 KIPS - - - - - > OK CHECK 3/16" x 4" LONG VERTICAL FILLET WELD FOR GRAVITY IN THE Y-Y DIRECTION G.F. = 2,700 # / IN x 4.0" x 1 WELD = 10.8 KIPS - - - - OK NOTE: VERTICAL LOAD REDUNDANCY BY BEARING ON THE BEAM W. B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL AND RESORT, STAIR JOB NO: 23771Q ONE VAIL ROAD, VAIL, CO 81657 DATE: 11MAR08 CLIENT : THE DRAFTING SHOPPE SHEET ST1-6 DESIGN : RFM CHECK STRINGER TO FLOOR - CONNECTION #2 (5.0' WIDE STAIR FLIGHT): Rx = 1,850 #-FT / 5.0' = 0.37 KIPS Ry = 375 PLF x 3.75 FT / 2 = 0.70 KIPS Rz = (120 # + 290 / 2 = 0.21 KIPS ATTACH STRINGER TO EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR WITH 2 - 5/8" HILTI K-TZ WITH 4" EMBEDMENT. UNITY = SEE HILTI ANCHOR DESIGNER OUTPUT 0.07 < 1.0 or, NOTE: THE BUILDING'S ENGINEER OF RECORD SHOULD VERIFY THAT EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR IS ADEQUATE UNDER THE LOADING SHOWN IN THIS CALCULATION. W. B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL AND RESORT, STAIR `Q' JOB NO: 23771Q ONE VAIL ROAD, VAIL, CO 81657 DATE: IIMAR08 CLIENT : THE DRAFTING SHOPPE SHEET ST1-7 DESIGN : RFM CHECK STAIR STRINGER (3.5' WIDE STAIR FLIGHT): CHECK 6.83' RISE x 9.0' RUN -MC 12 x 10.6 STRINGER: STRINGER LOAD: WDL = 50 PSF x (42/12) FT / 2 = WLL = 100 PSF x (42/12) FT / 2 = Wn = 88.0 PLF + 175.0 PLF = CHECK GRAVITY LOADING: M = 263.0 PLF x (9.0 FT)' / 8 = fb = 2,670 #-FT x 12 / 9.23 IN3 = Fb = 0.6 x 36,000 PSI = UNITY = 3,480 / 21,600 = 0.16 < CHECK SEISMIC LOADING: 88.0 PLF 175.0 PLF 263.0 PLF 2,670 #-FT 3,480 PSI 21,600 PSI 1.00 OR Fpz-z = 0.119 x 50 PSF x 3.5'x (9.0'+ 5.0') = 290 # Mz-z = 290 # x (14.0') / 2 = 2,030 #-FT Iz-z = [0.382 IN" + 3.10 IN2 x (42"/2)21 x 2 = 2,730 IN4 Sz-z = 2,730 IN° / (42"/2) = 130 IN' fbz-z = 2,030 #-FT x 12 / 130 IN' = 190 PSI UNITY = 3,480 / 21,600 + 190 / 21,600 = 0.17 < 1.33 - - - - Ox CHECK STRINGER TO LANDING BEAM - CONNECTION #1 (3.5' WIDE STAIR FLIGHT): Rx = 2,030 #-FT / 3.5' = 0.58 KIPS Ry = 263 PLF x 9.0 FT / 2 = 1.18 KIPS Rz = (290 # + 290 / 2 = 0.29 KIPS ATTACH CHANNEL STRINGER TO HEADER BEAM WITH 3/16" FILLET WELD (2) 11/2" HORZ & (2) 4" VERT. Rw = 0.1875" x 0.707 x 0.3 x 70 KSI = 2,780 # / IN WELD STRENGTH Rp = 0.1875" x 0.4 x 36 KSI = 2,700 # / IN PLATE STRENGTH CHECK 3/16" x 1 1/2" LONG HORIZONTAL FILLET WELD FOR SEISMIC G.F. = 2,700 # / IN x 1.5" x 1 WELD = 4.0 KIPS - - - - Ox CHECK 3/16" x 4" LONG VERTICAL FILLET WELD FOR GRAVITY IN THE Y-Y DIRECTION G.F. = 2,700 # / IN x 4.0" x 1 WELD = 10.8 KIPS - - - - - > Ox NOTE: VERTICAL LOAD REDUNDANCY BY BEARING ON THE BEAM W. B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. BE PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL AND RESORT, STAIR ONE VAIL ROAD, VAIL, CO 81657 CLIENT : THE DRAFTING SHOPPE DESIGN : RFM JOB NO: 23771Q DATE: 11MAR08 SHEET ST1-8 CHECK STRINGER TO EXISTING ANGLE EMBED - CONNECTION #2 (3.5' WIDE STAIR FLIGHT): Rx = 2,030 #-FT / 3.5' = 0.58 KIPS Ry = 263 PLF x 9.0 FT / 2 = 1.18 KIPS Rz = (290 # + 290 / 2 = 0.29 KIPS ATTACH CHANNEL STRINGER TO EXISTING ANGLE EMBED BY OTHERS WITH 3/16" FILLET WELD (2) 2" HORZ & (2) 2" VERT. Rw = 0.1875" x 0.707 x 0.3 x 70 KSI = 2,780 # / IN WELD STRENGTH Rp = 0.1875" x 0.4 x 36 KSI = 2,700 # / IN PLATE STRENGTH CHECK 3/16" x 2" LONG HORIZONTAL FILLET WELD FOR SEISMIC G.F. = 2,700 # / IN x 2.0" x 1 WELD = 5.4 KIPS - - - - OK CHECK 3/16" x 2" LONG VERTICAL FILLET WELD FOR GRAVITY IN THE Y-Y DIRECTION G.F. = 2,700 # / IN x 2.0" x 1 WELD = 5.4 KIPS - - - - OK NOTE: VERTICAL LOAD REDUNDANCY BY BEARING ON ANGLE EMBED. NOTE: THE BUILDING'S ENGINEER OF RECORD SHOULD VERIFY THAT EXISTING ANGLE EMBED IS ADEQUATE UNDER THE LOADING SHOWN IN THIS CALCULATION. CHECK STRINGER TO FLOOR - CONNECTION #3 (3.5' WIDE STAIR FLIGHT): Rx = 2,030 #-FT / 3.5' = 0.58 KIPS Ry = 263 PLF x 9.0 FT / 2 = 1.18 KIPS Rz = (290 # + 290 / 2 = 0.29 KIPS ATTACH STRINGER TO EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR WITH 2 - 5/8" HILTI K-TZ WITH 4" EMBEDMENT. UNITY = SEE HIL.TI ANCHOR DESIGNER OUTPUT 0.10 < 1.0 OK NOTE: THE BUILDING'S ENGINEER OF RECORD SHOULD VERIFY THAT EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR IS ADEQUATE UNDER THE LOADING SHOWN IN THIS CALCULATION. W. B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. WrI PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL AND RESORT, STAIR `Q' JOB NO: 23771Q ONE VAIL ROAD, VAIL, CO 81657 DATE: 11MAR08 CLIENT : THE DRAFTING SHOPPE SHEET ST1-9 DESIGN : RFM LANDING HEADER AT MID-LANDING: LANDING HEADER BEAM CONSISTS OF TS8 x 4 x 1/4 x T-8" CHECK 7.67' LONG HEADER BEAM WITH (2) 5.67' RISE x 9.0' RUN STRINGERS EACH STRINGER IS ATTACHED AT APPROXIMATELY 2 1/2" FROM MID-SPAN AND (2) 5.67' RISE x 9.0' RUN STRINGER EACH STRINGER IS ATTACHED AT APPROXIMATELY 2" FROM EACH END. LANDING LOAD: WDL = 50 PSF x (42/12) FT / 2 WLL = 100 PSF x (42/12) FT / 2 Wn = 88.0 PLF + 263.0 PLF CHECK TS8x4x1/4 HEADER BEAM M = 2x1,180#x7.67'/2 - 1,180 # x (0.208'+ 3.708') + 263.0 PLF x (7.67 FT)' / 8 fb = 6,370 #-FT x 12 / 11.3 INS Fb = 0.6 x 46,000 # UNITY = 6,770 PSI / 27,600 PSI 88.0 PLF 175.0 PLF 263.0 PLF 6,370 #-FT 6,770 PSI 27,600 PSI = 0.25 < 1.00 OK CHECK LANDING HEADER TO WALL CONNECTION AT MID-LANDING: Rx = (290 # + 290 / 2 = 0.29 KIPS Ry = 2 x 1,180 # + 263 PLF x 7.67 FT / 2 = 3.38 KIPS Rz = 2,030 #-FT / 3.5' = 0.58 KIPS ATTACH STRINGER TO EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR WITH 2 - 3/4" HILTI K-TZ WITH 4 3/4" EMBEDMENT. UNITY = SEE HILTI ANCHOR DESIGNER OUTPUT 0.76 < 1.0 OY NOTE: THE BUILDING'S ENGINEER OF RECORD SHOULD VERIFY THAT EXISTING CONCRETE WALL IS ADEQUATE UNDER THE LOADING SHOWN IN THIS CALCULATION. CHECK L 4 x 3 x 3/8" x 1'-0" (LLV) FOR BENDING M = 3.38 KIPS x 1.5" = 5.07 KIP-IN S = (12") (0.375")z /6 = 0.281 INS fb = 5.07 KIP-IN / 0.281 INS = 18.0 KSI Fb = 0.75 x 36.0 = 27.0 KSI UNITY = 18.0 KSI / 27.0 KSI = 0.76 < 1.00 - - - - OR W. B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. WrB PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL AND RESORT, STAIR JOB NO: 23771Q ONE VAIL ROAD, VAIL, CO 81657 DATE: 11MAR08 CLIENT : THE DRAFTING SHOPPE SHEET ST1-10 DESIGN : RFM LANDING HEADER AT FLOOR LANDING: LANDING HEADER BEAM CONSISTS OF DOUBLE SPAN TS8 x 4 x 1/4 x 13'-8" CHECK 13.67' LONG HEADER BEAM WITH (4) 5.67' RISE x 9.0' RUN STRINGERS ATTACHED AT ONE END, 3.5', 3.92' AND 7.42' FROM THIS END AND (2) 2.0' RISE x 3.75' RUN STRINGERS ATTACHED AT OTHER END AND 5.0' FROM THIS END. LANDING LOAD: WDL = 50 PSF x (42/12) FT / 2 = 88.0 PLF WU = 100 PSF x (42/12) FT / 2 = 175.0 PLF Wn = 88.0 PLF + 263.0 PLF = 263.0 PLF 9.0' RUN STRINGER LOAD: PDL = 88 PLF x 9.0 FT / 2 = 400 # PLL = 175 PLF x 9.0 FT / 2 = 800 # Pn = 400 # + 800 # = 1,200 # 3.75' RUN STRINGER LOAD: PDL = 125 PLF x 4.0 FT / 2 = 250 # PLL = 250 PLF x4.0 FT / 2 = 500 # PTL = 250 # + 500 # = 750 # CHECK TS8x4x1/4 HEADER BEAM UNITY = SEE ENERCALC MULTI-SPAN BEAM OUTPUT = 4,870 / 27,600 = 0.18 < 1.0 CHECK LANDING HEADER SUPPORT AT FLOOR LANDING: REACTIONS AT GRID Al END: R1ypL = SEE ENERCALC OUTPUT = 1.0 KIPS RlyLL = SEE ENERCALC OUTPUT = 2.5 KIPS REACTIONS AT MID-SPAN: R1y,L = SEE ENERCALC OUTPUT = 2.0 KIPS R1yLL = SEE ENERCALC OUTPUT = 5.0 KIPS REACTIONS AT GRID A2 END: RlyDL = SEE ENERCALC OUTPUT = 0.5 KIPS R1yLL = SEE ENERCALC OUTPUT = 1.0 KIPS HEADER SUPPORTED BY TS3 x 3 x I/4 x 1'-0" - OKAY BY INSPECTION OK NOTE: THE BUILDING'S ENGINEER OF RECORD SHOULD VERIFY THAT EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR IS ADEQUATE UNDER THE LOADING SHOWN IN THIS CALCULATION. W. B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL AND RESORT, STAIR JOB NO: 23771Q ONE VAIL ROAD, VAIL, CO 81657 DATE: 11MAR08 CLIENT : THE DRAFTING SHOPPE SHEET ST1-11 DESIGN : KFM LANDING FLAT PLATE 12 GAGE: t = 0.109" PLATE THICKNESS W = 50 PSF PRESSURE Ls = [40,000 x W]" REQUIRED _ [40,000 x 0.109' / (50 / 144)]" = 37" RIB SPACING WELD LANDING FLAT PLATE TO ANGLES: USE STITCH WELDS @ 12" O.C. x 1 1/2" LONG x 1/8" LEG FILLET Rw = 0.707 x 0.125" x 0.3 x 70 KSI = 1,850 # / IN WELD STRENGTH Rp = 0.105" x 0.4 x 36 KSI = 1,512 # / IN PLATE STRENGTH G.F. = 1,512#/IN xI" /1.00' = 1,512#/FT oK LANDING RIBS: RIBS SPACED AT 3.0' O.C. MAXIMUM W = 150 PSF x 3.0' = 450 PLF SPAN = = 3.5' M = 450 PLF x 3.5" / 8 x 12 = 8,270 #-IN USE L 2 ''/z' x 2 %2" x 3/16" ORIENTED IN "V" PATTERN WITH 1/8" x 1 %2" LONG FILLET WELDS @ 6" O.C.: S = 0.84 INS fb = 10,800 #-IN / 0.84 IN' = 12,900 PSI Fb = 0.6 x 36,000 PSI = 21,600 PSI - - - - OK W. B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL AND RESORT, STAIR JOB NO: 23771Q ONE VAIL ROAD, VAIL, CO 81657 DATE: 11MAR08 CLIENT : THE DRAFTING SHOPPE SHEET ST1-12 DESIGN : RFM HANDRAILS: CHECK 1 1/4" STD. PIPE HANDRAIL FOR 4.0' MAX. SPAN P = = 200 # M1 = 200 # x 48" / 4 = 2,400 #-IN w = 50 PLF M2 = 50 PLF (4.0 FT)2 / 8 x 12 = 1,200 #-IN fb = 2,400 #-IN / 0.222 IN' = 10.8 KSI Fb = 0.66 x 35 KSI = 23.1 KSI UNITY = 10.8/23.1 = 0.47 < 1.33 - - - - - > oR CHECK 1 1/4" STD. PIPE HANDRAIL POST FOR 4.0' MAX. SPAN P1 = = 200 # P2 = 50 PLF x 4.0 FT = 200 # M = 200 # x 34" = 6,800 #-IN fb = 6,800 #-IN / 0.222 IN' = 30.6 KSI Fb = 0.66 x 35 KSI = 23.1 KSI UNITY = 30.6/23.1 = 1.32 < 1.33 - - - - - > OR CHECK 3/16" FILLET WELD ALL AROUND POST TO STRINGER tw = 0.707 x 3/16" = 0.133 Sw = 0.098175 ((1.926")4 -(1.66 ,)4) / 1.926" = 0.314 IN' fw = 6,800 #-IN / 0.314 IN' = 21.7 KSI Fw = 0.3 x 70.0 KSI = 21.0 KSI UNITY = 21.7/21.0 = 1.03 < 1.33 - - - - OK W. B. CLAUSEN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL AND RESORT, STAIR `Q' JOB NO: 23771Q ONE VAIL ROAD, VAIL, CO 81657 DATE: IIMAR08 CLIENT : THE DRAFTING SHOPPE SHEET ST1-13 DESIGN : RFM GUARDRAILS: CHECK 1 1/2" STD. PIPE GUARDRAIL FOR 4.0' MAX. SPAN P = = 200 # M1 = 200 # x 48" / 4 = 2,400 #-IN w = = 50 PLF M2 = 50 PLF (4.0 FT)Z / 8 x 12 = 1,200 #-IN fb = 2,400 #-IN / 0.309 IN' = 7.8 KSI Fb = 0.66 x 35 KSI = 23.1 KSI UNITY = 7.8/23.1 = 0.34 < 1.33 - - - - - > OK CHECK 1 1/2" STD. PIPE GUARDRAIL POST FOR 4.0' MAX. SPAN PI = = 200 # P2 = 50 PLF x 4.0 FT = 200 # M = 200 # x 42" = 8,400 #-IN fb = 8,400 #-IN / 0.309 IN' = 27.2 KSI Fb = 0.66 x 35 KSI = 23.1 KSI UNITY = 27.2/23.1 = 1.18 < 1.33 - - - - - > Ox CHECK 1/4" FILLET WELD ALL AROUND POST TO EDGE ANGLE tw = 0.707 x 1/4" = 0.177" Sw = 0.098175 ((2.254")a - (1.90")4) / 2.254" = 0.557 IN' fw = 8,400 #-IN / 0.557 IN' = 15.1 KSI Fw = 0.3 x 70.0 KSI = 21.0 KSI UNITY = 15.1/21.0 = 0.72 < 1.33 OK CHECK L6 x 3 1/2 x 1/2 x 0'-8" AT BASE OF POST M = 200 # x 46" = 9,200 #-IN fb = 9,200 #-IN / 0.333 IN' = 27.6 KSI Fb = 0.75 x 36 KSI = 27.0 KSI UNITY = 27.6/27.0 = 1.02 < 1.33 - - - - OK CHECK (2)1/2" DIA x 5 3/4" EMBED SIMPSON TITEN HD ANCHORS FROM BASE ANGLE TO EXISTING CONCRETE BY OTHERS LOAD APPLIED HORIZONTALLY OUTWARD - SEE SIMPSON ANCHOR DESIGNER OUTPUT Tu = 9,200 #-IN / 2" + 200 # = 4,800 # - - - - - > Ox LOAD APPLIED HORIZONTALLY INWARD - SEE SIMPSON ANCHOR DESIGNER OUTPUT Vu = 9,200 #-IN / 3 1/2" = 2,630 # . - - - - - > Ox NOTE: THE BUILDING'S ENGINEER OF RECORD SHOULD VERIFY THAT EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR IS ADEQUATE UNDER THE LOADING SHOWN IN THIS CALCULATION. Title : Stair Q Job #23771Q Dsgnr: KM Date: 10:44AM, 12 MAR 08 Description : Four Seasons, Vail, CO Scope : Rev: 560100 user. KW-060171QVer,1.6.1,25-Cct2002 Multi-Span Steel Beam Page 1 (c)1983-2002 ENERCALC Engineering Software w:Q3700k23771\stairq\23771stair(-ec.ecw:Calc ascription Stair Q - Floor Landing Header General Information Calculations are designed to AISC 9th Edition ASD and 1997 UBC Requirements eea .n Fy - Yield Stress 46.00 ksl Load Duration Factor 1.00 Spans Considered Continuous Over Supports Span Information Description Span ft 6.83 6.83 Steel Section TS8X4X1/4 TS8X4X1/4 End Fixity Pin-Pin Pin-Pin Unbraced Length ft 6.83 6.83 Loads uvc wav vsea i ms span Yes Yes - Dead Load Wit 0.088 0.088 Live Load Wit 0.175 0.175 Dead Load k/ft Live Load k/ft 0.250 Start ft End ft 6.833 Point #1 DL k 0.400 0.400 LL k 0.800 0.800 @X ft 0.580 Point #2 DL k 0.400 0.250 LL k 0.800 0.500 @ X ft 3.500 1.830 Point #3 DL k 0.400 0.250 LL k 0.800 0.500 @ X It 3.920 6.830 Results Mmax @ Cntr k-ft 4.49 0.54 @X= ft 3.51 4.83 Max @ Left End k-ft 0.00 -4.57 Max @ Right End k-ft -4.57 0.00 fb : Actual psi 4,862.4 4,862.4 Fb : Allowable psi 27,600.0 27,600.0 fv : Actual Bending OK Bending OK psi 0.0 0.0 Fv : Allowable psi 18,400.0 18,400.0 Shear OK Shear OK Reactions & Deflections Shear @ Left k 3.38 3.21 Shear @ Right k 3.72 1.28 Reactions... DL @ Left k 0.88 1.96 LL @ Left k 2.50 4.98 Total @ Left k 3.38 6.94 DL @ Right k 1.96 0.46 LL @ Right k 4.98 0.82 Total @ Right k 6.94 1.28 Max. Deflection in -0.023 0.002 @X= ft 3.19 1.23 Span/Deflection Ratio 3,643.7 34,273.8 Query Values Location ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 Shear k 3.38 3.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 0 00 Moment k-ft 0.00 -4.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 . 0 00 Max. Deflection in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 . 0.00 y: Clausen :KFM User application PROFIS Anchor 1.10.0 _i. Sheet 1 of 4 Project: POUR SEASONS VAIL Contract No.: 1 http:/Avww.us.hllti.com/ ! E-Mall: Location/Date: STAIR 'Q' - BASE AT 5.0' WIDE FLIGHT Ii Specifter's comments: Anchor type and size: Effective embedment depth: Material: Proof: Stand-off installation: Anchor plate: Base material: Reinforcement Anchor Kwik Bolt - Tensile Zone (KB-TZ)-518 (4) hw= 4:00 in, Carbon Steel design method: ACI 3181 AC 193 e, = 0.00 in. (no stand-off) ; t = 0.25 tn. CUSTOM ; fpk = 36000 psi ; I,, x ly x t = 8.00 x 3.00 x 0.25 in, cracked concrete 3000, f,'- 3000 psi: h = 10.00 in. condition B ; no supplemental splitting reinforcement present edge reinforcement: none or < No. 4 bar plan view y section A 1=0.25 t - - h„=4.00 f x V m 0 v O 1 1 2 m section B H O " 06 V 7 4 50,00 5.00 ~~50~~0--0~ section A Loading Governing loads Pb, in.-lb] N = 0 V.,= 300 M.= 0 My= 0 f z . _ : ' x V,= 5520 Mti 0 Governing loads (Ib, in.-Ibj N 0 V 520 V M 300 0 M 0 M 0 Eccentricity (structural section) [n.) e,=0.00; e,=0.00 Seismic loads (cracked concrete assumed; categories C, D, E, or F): no Input data and resets must be Checked far agreement with the existing condAiom and for pleus"*! I PROFIS Anchar i c) 2863106 AG, FL•9494 Scnaan IM is a reostered Trademark of Hiti AG. Schaan Company: Clausen Engineer Sheet 2 of 4 Specifier. KFM Project: FOUR SEASONS VAIL User application Address: Contract No., PROFIS Anchor 1. 10.0 Phone/Fax: - Responsble: http://www.us.hild.comi E-Mail: Location/Date: STAIR 'O' - BASE AT 3.0' 1NIDE FLIGHT I! Load case (governing): Anchor reactions [lb] Tension force: (+Tension -Pressure) Anchor Tension force force 1 2 0 0 300 300 - _....---........._..-.....3 max. concrete compressive strain ( %o): 0.00 max. concrete compressive stress [psi): 0 resulting tension force [lb): 0 resulting compression force pb): 0 Shear load Design values [lb] Proof Load V. Strength #Vn Utilization N f%] = V-10V„ ~ Status Steel failure 300 6861 4 OK Pryout failure 300 - 7387 4 OK [ Concrete edge failure in direction x+ 600 9192 7- 3 OK Steel failure V„(lb) 4V~a[Ib] V:DbI _10555 0.650 6861 300 Pryout failure Ajin'l A,.[in2j c(in.] k~ 204.00 144.00 48.00 2.000 W«f,n W.c2-N kQ . 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 17 Nb[Ib) 7449 Concrete edg 4 0.700 e failure in direction x+ OVeoDb] 7387 V~,{ib) 300 iCn ] d.[in.) c,Ein.) A-Jinj A,~.Cnj L2-9 0.63 32.00 960.00 4608.00 W .V .......L.- - ~!~'Y ~4"/ 1.000 1.000 ~ 1.000 1.000 VeEb] $V jjb] V~pb) 63027 0.700 9192 600 i Input data and revrlte must be checked for agreement with the ex song eond(dwis and for pt"bdity' PROFPS AnWwr (c) 2DG3 AM AG.. FL-9498 8Wtaan Dili K a n9istered Trademahc of Klti AG. SWwan i User application PR01=1S Anchor 1.10.0 http l/www, us. hif ti.com! Company: Clausen Specifier: KFM Address-. Phone/Fax: - / - E-Mail: Allowable Stress t]esian tRafar It^r'..KCt7i ein..tn -..s...... t .....s U-9- Sheet 3 of 4 Project: FOUR SEASONS VAIL Contract No.: STAIR V - BASE AT 5.9 WIDE Tension Jib] Shear jib) Reference for load including seismic excluding seismic including seismic excluding seismic AC1318 Section D.4.4 _ 0 _ 6565 ACt318 Section DA.5 - 0 - 5930 R,t,,,, = R a / a Trr..,„ASO + VN„.,,, = .c= 1.2 Proof of the transmission of the anchor loads to the supports Transmission of th - anchor ads into the ata5ate Checking the transfer of loads into the base material is required in accordance with AC13181 Shear resistance of base material Shear resistance of the base material must be checked according to relevant approval or standard! Warnings Condition A applies where the potential concrete failure surfaces are crossed by supplementary reinforcement proportioned to tie the potential concrete failure prism into the structural member. Condition B applies where such supplementary reinforcement is not provided. or where pullout or pryout strength governs. Fastening meets the design criteria! trgx,t data and results omt be Checked for agreement rath tie existing middom and for plawtbiity! PROM AWv ( c) TM_ gttl AG, _F191191 Schean Mfi is a registered TrademaAh of H)b AG. Schaan s User application Address: Contract No.: PROFIS Anchor 1.10.0 PhonefFax: - / - Responsible: http:ihvww.us.hltd.com/ E-Mail: t:ocatlon/Date: STAIR V- BASE AT 3.6 WIDE STAIR Specifier's comments: Kvvik Solt -Tensile Zone {Ka.12!y 1a (4) t„,= 4.00 in. Carbon Steel design method: AC1 3181 AC 193 e, =0.00 in. (no stanri-off) ; t = 0.26 In, CUSTOM ; f,* = 36000 psi ; ~ x lr, x t = 8.00 x 3.00x0.25 in. cracked concrete 3000, f,'- 3000 psi; h =10.00 in. condition B no supplemental splitting reinforcement {resent edge reinforcement none or < No. d bar ueome plan view ~ i o section A. h, mll~ x co section B o ` is R1 _L so.oo j s.aa j 5o.oa section A ~ - - - - Ij h =10.00 Loading Governing loads 1?b in.-ra] N=O V„=410 M=0 M,=0 z V, = 820 Mx= 0 Governing toads Pb, in.-lb] N 0 V 820 V 410 M 0 fN 0 M 0 Eccentricity (structural section) (in.] e„=0.00; eY=0.00 Seismic loads (cracked concrete assumed; categories C, D, E, or F): no / 3/ ■ PROFiS An" (c) 2063 HWt AG, F1-9494 SP-h a HAtl 6 a f*gm1Wed TM&ffk tk d HjWAG. ScAaM l3l 1c User application Address: PROFIS Anchor 1.10.0 PhonetFax; - ! - Anchor type and size: Kwik Bait - Tensile Zone, (KB-TZ)-314 (4 34) Effective embedment depth: b,= 4.75 in. Material: Carbon Steel Proof. design; method: ACt 3181 AC 193 Stand-off installation: eb = 0.00 in. (no stand-cuff) ; t = 0.25 in. Anchor plate: CUSTOM ; fi, = 36000 psi : i, x 4, x t = 12.00 x 4.00 x 0.25 in. Base tnaterial; cracked concrete 3000, f~' = 3000 psi: h = 8.00 in. Reinforcement: condition B : no supplemental splitting reinforcement present edge reinforcement > No. 4 bar - Governing loads Qb, in.4bj N 820 V,= 5410 M, 0 My= 0 z Vx= 410 Mx 8120 i,,rdj rninn I-A. (9, in AM N 820 410 V 5410 an s120 M 0 M 0 Eccentricity (structural section) (in.] e, = 0.00: e, 0.00 Seismic loads (cracked concrete assumed; categories C, D, E, or F); no PP,OFIS Aiulwr (e) 2003 t#M AG. F1.9494 Schoen l4IU la a reg)sterM Tradamuk W Ft~l AG, Scbaan L= 11 Company Clausen Eng ineer Sheet 3 of 4 Specifier: KFM Project FOUR SEASONS VAIL User application Address: -Contract Na PROFIS Anchor 1.J0.0 Phone/Fax, - Responsible: http:(Avww.us.hitti.com/ E-Mail: Location/Date STAIR 10,- HEADER 13/12/2008 Pryout failure NjIb) #Vb Vb1 ) 9639 0.700 1100g 2713 Concrete edge failure in direction x+ (In-) d [in) A[in9 A. in~j 1.50 t7.75 32.00 -768.00 4608.00 ~ ~ 7adY 7n:Y ~~ti ~¢.Y 1.Q00 1.000 1.040 1.200 1 1 Combined tension and shear loads j3Mr=¢;,}f,<=1dr Allowable Stress Design (Refer.. ICC-ESR) anchor group relevant (tension) anchor group relevant (shear) Ral,;,,,,m = R41 a TITa,,,,,,,, + VN <-1:2 Proof of the transmission of the anchor loads to the supports Tr m ans ission of he anchor toads into the conemte Checking the transfer of loads into the base material is required in accordarwe ,with ACI 3181 Shear resistance of base material Shear resistance of the base material must be checked according to relevant approval or standard! Inw dataaad re wts Wait be checked for Weemmn v0i tw wda6ng WW Wm and for 03us{bAlyl PROF18 Anchor (c) 2993 MO N3, FL-9499 Bataan tAO is a reaWered Tradema k of FAIN AO, semen A,~[in'j a[irt=j cjin.) k~ 331.31 203.06 46.00 2:Ooo W.ctw W«z:~ ~so.ts ~~as• far 1.000: 1.000 1.000 ' 1 .(100 17 V,[tb] ~ ~V~[1b) V„~Ib] 69043 0.700 9566 5426 = Nti/i~N„ V„/~Va i; _ Utilization (iriv 10A] ..Status 4:556 0:561 5/3 76, OK Tension [!b) . Shear[lb] Reference for load including seismic excluding seismic including seismic excluding seismic ACt318_Sect3on-0.4:d - - - - - - - - - - - 7502 - - - " - - - - - - - - - - Bg44 - AC1318 Section D:4:5 - 6595 8236 n ~r User application Address; Contract No., PROFIS Anchor 1 10_0 ! Phone/Fax: - / - I PpgnnrmihL-- e appnes where the potential concrete failure surfaces are crossed by supplementary reinforcementp(gxAoned tote the Crete failure prism into the structural member, Condition B applies where such supplementary reinforcement is not provided, Fastening meets the design criterial a>put oars arw rss~nts crust ae ttregted fir agretmx# wJpi the erdsli~ condtlom and far ptausbilftyt PRUFIS McAa (c) 2IP03 i Gttl AG, F1-9494 3chaan tea kt a re~steted 7tademark of Fli AG. Schaan ,t Date: 12 Mar 2008 Job: 23771Q Subject: Stair Q Guardrail GIVEN: Base Material Type: Normal Weight Concrete Base Material Mechanical Properties: fc = 3000 psi Base Material Temperature: T = NA Minimum Base Material Thickness = 48 inches Applied Tension Load per Anchor: Tapplied = 2400 lb. Applied Shear Load per Anchor: Vapplied = 0 lb. Anchor Spacing: Anchor Edge Distance: S1 = NA C1 = NA S2 = 6 inches C2 = 4 inches S3 = NA C3 = 6 inches S4 = NA C4 = NA S5 = NA CRITICAL MCHOR Page 1 (i ,I z Date: 12 Mar 2008 Page 2 Job: 23771 Q Subject: Stair Q Guardrail CALCULATIONS: OPTION 1 Proposed Anchor System = Titen HD Anchor Diameter (in.) or Rebar Size = 1/2 Embedment Depth = 3 5/8 inches Temperature Sensitivity Factor: ftemp = 1.00 Load Duration Increase for Seismic/Wind: fduration = Tension: 1.33 Shear: 1.33 Allowable Tension: T = 2270 lb. Reduced Efficiency Based on Spacing: fS1=1 asS1=NA fS2 = 0.63 + [(1 - 0.63)x(6 - 2)/(8 - 2)] 1, fS2 = 0.8767 fS3 = 1 as S3 = NA fS4 = 1 as S4 = NA fS5 = 1 as S5 = NA (fS)tot. = 1.000 x 0.8767 x 1.000 x 1.000 x 1.000 = 0.8767 Reduced Efficiency Based on Edge/End Distance: fC1=1asC1=NA fC2 = 0.57 + [(1 - 0.57)x(4 - 1.75)/(4 - 1.75)] 1, fC2 = 1.000 fC3 = 0.57 + [(1 - 0.57)x(6 - 1.75)/(4 - 1.75)] 1, fC3 = 1.000 fC4 = 1 as C4 = NA (fC)tot. = 1.000 x 1.000 x 1.000 x 1.000 = 1.000 Tdesign is equal to: Tdesign = 2270 x 0.8767 x 1.000 x 1.33 x 1.00 = 2647 lb. >=Tapplied, OK - - Allowable Shear: V = 2795 lb. Reduced Efficiency Based on Spacing: fS 1 = 1 as S1 = NA fS2 = 0.77 + [(1 - 0.77)x(6 - 2)/(8 - 2)] 1, fS2 = 0.9233 fS3 = 1 as S3 = NA fS4=1 as S4=NA fS5 = 1 as S5 = NA (fS)tot. = 1.000 x 0.9233 x 1.000 x 1.000 x 1.000 = 0.9233 Date: 12 Mar 2008 page 3 Job: 23771Q Subject: Stair Q Guardrail Reduced Efficiency Based on Edge/End Distance: fC1=1asC1=NA fC2 = 0.20 + [(1 - 0.20)x(4 - 1.75)/(6 - 1.75)] 1, fC2 = 0.6235 fC3 = 0.20 + [(1 - 0.20)x(6 - 1.75)/(6 - 1.75)] 1, fC3 = 1.000 fC4 = 1 as C4 = NA (fC)tot. = 1.000 x 0.6235 x 1.000 x 1.000 = 0.6235 Allowable Shear Value for Design: Vdesign is equal to: Vdesign = 2795 x 0.9233 x 0.6235 x 1.33 x 1.00 = 2140 lb. >=Vapplied, OK Check Combined Tension & Shear Interaction: (2400/2647)^1.666667 + (0/2140)"1.666667 = 0.849504 < or = 1.0 OK Where n = 5/3 for Carbon/Stainless Steel Wedge-All, Titen HD and Carbon/Stainless Steel Drop- In anchors installed in Normal Weight Concrete only. Otherwise, n = 1 for all other cases. Date: 12 Mar 2008 Job: 23771Q Subject: Stair Q Guardrail GIVEN: Base Material Type: Normal Weight Concrete Base Material Mechanical Properties: Pc = 3000 psi Base Material Temperature: T = NA Minimum Base Material Thickness = 48 inches Applied Tension Load per Anchor: Tapplied = 0 lb. Applied Shear Load per Anchor: Vapplied = 1315 lb. Anchor Spacing: S1 = 6 inches S2 = NA S3 = NA S4 = NA S5 = NA Anchor Edge Distance: C1 = 6 inches C2 = NA C3 = NA C4 = 4 inches + a r t • x' ,a Page 4 I .5 a Date: 12 Mar 2008 Page 5 Job: 23771Q Subject: Stair Q Guardrail CALCULATIONS: OPTION 1 Proposed Anchor System = Titen HD Anchor Diameter (in.) or Rebar Size = 1/2 Embedment Depth = 2 3/4 inches Temperature Sensitivity Factor: ftemp = 1.00 Load Duration Increase for SeismicM/ind: fduration = Tension: 1.33 Shear: 1.33 Allowable Tension: T = 1400 lb. Reduced Efficiency Based on Spacing: fS1 = 0.72 + [(1 - 0.72)x(6 - 2)/(8 - 2)] 1, fS1 = 0.9067 fS2=1 as S2=NA fS3 = 1 as S3 = NA fS4 = 1 as S4 = NA fS5 = 1 as S5 = NA (fS)tot. = 0.9067 x 1.000 x 1.000 x 1.000 x 1.000 = 0.9067 Reduced Efficiency Based on Edge/End Distance: fC1 = 0.67 + [(1 - 0.67)x(6 - 1.75)/(4 - 1.75)] 1, fC1 = 1.000 fC2 = 1 as C2 = NA fC3 = 1 as C3 = NA fC4 = 0.67 + [(1 - 0.67)x(4 - 1.75)/(4 - 1.75)] 1, fC4 = 1.000 (fC)tot. = 1.000 x 1.000 x 1.000 x 1.000 = 1.000 Tdesign is equal to: - - - - - - - Tdesign =-1400 x 0.9067 x 1.000 x-1.33 x 1.00 = 1688 lb. >=Tapplied, OK - Allowable Shear: V = 2055 lb. Reduced Efficiency Based on Spacing: fS1 = 0.77 + [(1 - 0.77)x(6 - 2)/(8 - 2)] 1, fS1 = 0.9233 fS2 = 1 as S2 = NA fS3 = 1 as S3 = NA fS4 = 1 as S4 = NA fS5 = 1 as S5 = NA (fS)tot. = 0.9233 x 1.000 x 1.000 x 1.000 x 1.000 = 0.9233 !f1 d r Date: 12 Mar 2008 Page 6 Job: 23771 Q Subject: Stair Q Guardrail Reduced Efficiency Based on Edge/End Distance: fC1 = 0.25 + [(1 - 0.25)x(6 - 1.75)/(6 - 1.75)] 1, fC1 = 1.000 fC2 = 1 as C2 = NA fC3 = 1 as C3 = NA fC4 = 0.25 + [(1 - 0.25)x(4 - 1.75)/(6 - 1.75)] 1, fC4 = 0.6471 (fC)tot. = 1.000 x 1.000 x 1.000 x 0.6471 = 0.6471 Allowable Shear Value for Design: Vdesign is equal to: Vdesign = 2055 x 0.9233 x 0.6471 x 1.33 x 1.00 = 1633 lb. >=Vapplied, OK Check Combined Tension & Shear Interaction: (0/1688)^1.666667 + (1315/1633)^1.666667 = 0.697054 < or = 1.0 OK Where n = 5/3 for Carbon/Stainless Steel Wedge-All, Titen HD and Carbon/Stainless Steel Drop- In anchors installed in Normal Weight Concrete only. Otherwise, n = 1 for all other cases. DROJEC T : FOUR SEA; CIN AT VAIL LOS Al"IO : VAIL, COLORADO CON i RACTOR: LAYTON CONST. DATE: 1/17/08 SUBMITtcu" r C ` (DATEA THIS REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL CONTRACT CQM NU ( RELEASE THE SUBCONTRACTOF' (SUBMITTAL M.) 3 TO THE PLANS LIANCE pNC DOES NOT AND SPECIFICATIONS SUPPLIER FROM COMPLYING ND/OR PURCHASE ORDER AGREEMENTS- AND r F N ARCHiRCCS OR , ENOR SUBCONTRACT ;rHE ARCHI rE CONSULTANTS F DOES THIS RELEASE ' ROM THEIR CONTRACTUAL tlt~~ t ONTRACTORS SIGNATUR _ LAYTON CONST UCTION COMPANY INC. L Level 5 These calculations arc prepared to be in -on ormance with the pro-ie- plans and • specifications and are submitted to shov. w '9 e L Y ;:ert in etails or the S1JPN r S;T CN . to i.lnLn0 s;{St:^1. ? he C1ra1Ni;"J,s-ar e X'n Intend^d to re;at° information ccnta!med in to puns ream din, force and `rytend e d ~ ~ or file cr t*,l Y' l`re'srre Jsiriy S,: $ie IV7 . . warranty grprerJed 0:' i lplied. as tc the;, onnt' , adequa,,y o` the ;design is to be rnarrte b•i t Virtue of this sut)mitl_a'-. Cc..?e nial CCU gr, 17 c { a - i Gay(303) Town of Vail OFFICE C.0,-r Jp)o•joT L2~a0A~ ° a: E O ~ c c ~ 'Ar. z ~ I O'D Q a 15 a: a: z 4 n ~c c 0 n m sjaaullu:.] jmnjon 1S 'lb' SuulnsuoD 21 i`)NINN:IIti NVINIISIN ,ill p°-~)'La1sQ •sluawnaop 13clluoa yys aautlldwoa 11n) pue saptJl laglo yp„ ylo.e slg )o uonr.ulplooa 'uosunllsuo) )o sanbluyaal put sassalold uoneaugtJ'sa!l!luvnb'saaueuala'saauelalo) Jo) sails (1ol if suolsuawlp xullelallo+ pue auiuul)una soJ alglsuodsaJ si Jolae.lluo:) ..quo sluawnJop lat Jluoa of alutwloJuOJ ltlaua`n pue illwjo)uoa u%l sap lelnlaells lo) pa%3!.wl som lWl!wgnS •wnc, I3tJ1YoJ ol, sAutq:) azlloylnV loN o(I suo!)NION ,(luo elep icuo111pPa PaU11UaP:'Pa.Malsa11 Pa.Mal.saL JOkI :AISROIAM 631-LIKE(ls_ AINO 311313artls 01 avol H03 63A53tA3N- MAINE S!' IIIVHRS3a I a3y13NX- 111011SU aNt' GUON' St' 3SIAI 0310N SNOIDUS03 3At' - Ksxvi, SN0I;.1"D":3 Ot` ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:12:5C P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 55' BAND L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 55.30 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. Volume to surface ratio of member 6.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .227 ksi Shrinkage 5.103 ksi Creep .628 ksi Relaxation 4.286 ksi Total long-term stress losses 10.243 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 1 of 87 Jr.. r LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (55' BAND) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start cente r right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9------- - 10------ 11-- 12- 1 31.41 1 6.00 1.00 10.35 .08 .50 .08 189.95 193.8 2 198.36 2 20.50 1 10.50 1.00 6.00 .08 .50 .08 198.36 202.2 6 199.04 51.91 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 196.79 ksi Long term stress losses 10.24 ksi Final average stress 186.55 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.54 k Anchor set influence from left pull (202.97ksi; .752) 39.78 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 4.29 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 4.29 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082569 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 4.54 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .737; Max along tendon .752 Page 2 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SLINCOAST POST-TENSION , INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:13 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 55' BAND 1.2 FILE NAME: 55' BAND 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses _ 200 195 - - - - 190 - 185 - - _ 180 - -'-.-J--- '--'---L-..-_I L-LJ- ~ i ~~JJ.J Span 1 Span 2 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 11 8 - - 10.510.35 8 10 9 8 7 _ tressing-End_ _DEad-E - 8 i 4 3 - ' 2 L I 0 Span 1 Span 2 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) Long term stress losses Final average stress Final average force in tendon Anchor set influence from left pull (202.97ksi; 196.79 10.24 186.55 28.54 .752) 39.78 ksi ksi ksi k ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( ooksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set 4.29 .00 4.29 inch inch inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082569 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force 4.54 .25 33.05 inch inch kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES rage .s or 6 Y - - - - - - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:14:29 P R C J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 127' BAND L 0 N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 226.09 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 6.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .926 ksi Shrinkage 5.103 ksi Creep 2.567 ksi Relaxation 3.725 ksi Total long-term stress losses 12.321 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 4 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (127' BAND) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/1, X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8--- -9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- 1 14.58 1 4.25 2.50 7.00 .08 .50 .08 187.54 189.69 192.92 2 26.66 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 192.92 197.16 200.77 3 24.66 1 7.00 1.00 10.50 .08 .50 .08 200.77 198.82 194.57 4 33.75 1 10.50 1.00 16.00 .08 .50 .08 194.57 189.65 184.59 5 24.83 1 16.00 1.00 6.00 .08 .50 .08 184.59 178.53 175.58 124.48 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 190.90 ksi Long term stress losses 12.32 ksi Final average stress 178.58 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.32 k Anchor set influence from left pull (201.77ksi; .747) 42.85 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 9.97 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 9.97 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .080099 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 10.22 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .695; Max along tendon .747 Page 5 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsofI.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:14 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 127' BAND 1.2 FILE NAME : 127' BAND 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction I nccoc 200 195 190 185 180 175 170 165 tttttttttttttt. I nnn-Term I nssec II 1111111.1.111.1111111 1 -I.. I_I_1_LJ_L1~1_1 J.J_IJ1 I LIJJIIJJJ_1_-I1Ll_I ~J-IJ~IJ~IJ~J~JJ IJ_LILWJ_1_IJJJ_1J1 Span 1 Span 2 13 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 15.0 12.5 10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0.0 Span 3 Span 4 Span 5 -4.25 7 7 n 10. 10.5 1 : 6 6 Bea En - \ 2.5 - 1 1 7 Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 190.90 ksi Long term stress losses 12.32 ksi Final average stress 178.58 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.32 k Anchor set influence from left pull (201.77ksi; .747) 42.85 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( ooksi; .ooo) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 9.97 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 9.97 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .080099 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 10.22 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Span 5 Page 6 of 87 - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:15:07 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 127' BAND P9 L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 166.40 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. Volume to surface ratio of member 6.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .682 ksi Shrinkage 5.103 ksi Creep 1.889 ksi Relaxation 4.224 - ksi Total long-term stress losses - 11.898 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch''2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 7 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (127' BAND P9) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/1, X3/1, start cent er right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8-- --9------- - 10------ 11- 12- 1 27.16 1 6.00 1.00 16.00 .08 .50 .08 186.92 190. 61 196.36 2 24.83 1 16.00 1.00 6.00 .08 .50 .08 196.36 199. 65 196.34 51.99 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 194.84 ksi Long term stress losses 11.90 ksi Final average stress 182.94 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.99 k Anchor set influence from left pull (201.46ksi; .746) 34.97 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) 00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 4.25 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 4.25 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .081751 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 4.50 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .727; Max along tendon .746 Page 8 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:15 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 127' BAND P9 1.2 FILE NAME : 127' BAND P9 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses 200 195 - - " 190 _ - - I ~ 185 - 180 I 175 ~y - - - Span 1 Span 2 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 6 _ _ 1 16 6 , 15.0 12.5 - 10.0 5 - 7 - _-Stressing_En Dead-End- . 5.0 2.5 0.0 Span 1 Span 2 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 194.84 ksi Long term stress losses 11.90 ksi Final average stress 182.94 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.99 k Anchor set influence from left pull (201.46ksi; .746) 34.97 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 4.25 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 4.25 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .081751 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 4.50 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 9 of 87 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:15:39 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 127' BAND P10 L 0 N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 166.40 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o volume to surface ratio of member 6.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .682 ksi Shrinkage 5.103 ksi Creep 1.889 ksi Relaxation 4.224 ksi - Total long-term stress losses 11.898 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 10 of 87 r LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (127' BAND P10) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- 1 14.66 1 4.25 2.50 7.00 .08 .50 .08 187.60 189.75 192.97 2 26.66 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 192.97 197.21 200.82 3 24.66 1 7.00 1.00 10.50 .08 .50 .08 200.82 198.83 194.58 CAN 7.50 1 10.50 6.00 .00 194.58 190.75 73.48 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 195.69 ksi Long term stress losses 11.90 ksi Final average stress 183.79 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.12 k Anchor set influence from left pull (201.80ksi; .747) 42.90 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 6.03 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 6.03 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082108 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 6.28 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .721; Max along tendon .747 Page 11 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST PO ST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:15 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE: 127' BAND P10 1.2 FILE NAME : 127' BAND P10 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses 200 195 - 190 - j - 185 - i - - 180 175 --r~~~ysu-,-i-u~ Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Right Cantilever 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 11 _4.25 7,7 77 10. 10.5 6 10- - 9 = - 8 eW End 7 6 Stressing End - 5 - 4 3 _ 2 2 5 - 1 . uu 0 Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 195.69 ksi Long term stress losses 11.90 ksi Final average stress 183.79 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.12 k Anchor set influence from left pull (201.8oksi; .747) 42.90 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 6.03 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 6.03 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082108 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 6.28 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 12 of 87 I % ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:16:33 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 134' BAND P6 L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 192.16 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. % Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .787 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.182 ksi Relaxation 4.179 ksi Total long-term stress losses 13.089 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 13 of 87 I Y LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (134' BAND P6) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9--------10------11------12- 1 22.25 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 189.07 192.07 195.68 2 24.33 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 195.68 199.81 201.72 3 15.83 1 7.00 5.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 201.72 199.27 197.23 4 15.00 1 7.00 5.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 197.23 195.00 193.03 CAN 3.41 1 7.00 4.25 .00 193.03 189.40 80.82 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 196.30 ksi Long term stress losses 13.09 ksi Final average stress 183.21 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.03 k Anchor set influence from left pull (202.53ksi; .750) 45.03 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 6.66 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 6.66 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082364 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 6.91 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .715; Max along tendon .750 Page 14 of 87 I ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www,adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:16 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE: 134' BAND P6 1.2 FILE NAME: 134' BAND P6 1 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Crin4inn I n 200 195 190 185 180 175 I i iuxxnixxxuw- Span 1 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Right Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Right cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) Long term stress losses Final average stress Final average force in tendon Anchor set influence from left pull (202.53ksi; .750) . Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) . Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES 196.30 ksi 13.09 ksi 183.21 ksi 28.03 k 45.03 ft .00 ft 6.66 inch .00 inch 6.66 inch 082364 inch/ft 6.91 inch .25 inch 33.05 kips Page 15 of 87 - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:17:12 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 134' BAND P7 L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 192.16 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .787 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi creep 2.182 ksi Relaxation 2.275 ksi Total long-term stress losses 11.185 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .38 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch'2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 16 of 87 [ % LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (134' BAND P7) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start cent er right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8--- -9------- - 10------ 11- 12- 1 16.58 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 165.69 168. 57 172.30 CAN 5.00 1 7.00 4.25 .00 172.30 175.78 21.58 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 170.14 ksi Long term stress losses 11.18 ksi Final average stress 158.95 ksi Final average force in tendon 24.32 k Anchor set influence from left pull (175.78ksi; .651) 21.58 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 1.54 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 1.54 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .071386 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 1.92 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .38 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .651; Max along tendon .651 Page 17 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:17 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 134' BAND P7 1.2 FILE NAME: 134' BAND P7 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses 175 0 - - . - _ 170 0 - - . 167 5 . 165 0 . 162 5 - . 160 0 . - 157.5 - _ - 155 0 - . ~ = - Span 1 Right Cantilever 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 7 -4-25 - - - 7~ 4.2-6- 6 5 tressing-End-- -Dead-End 4 3 2 = 1 0 Span 1 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 170.14 ksi Long term stress losses 11.18 ksi Final average stress 158.95 ksi Final average force in tendon 24.32 k Anchor set influence from left pull (175.78ksi; .651) 21.58 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .0oksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 1.54 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 1.54 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .071386 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 1.92 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .38 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 18 of 87 ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:17:45 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 134' BAND P8 L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 192.16 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .787 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.182 ksi Relaxation 2.647 ksi Total long-term stress losses 11.556 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .38 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch-2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 19 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (134' BAND P8) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9--------10------11------12- 1 25.66 1 4.25 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 174.92 178.06 181.06 25.66 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 178.04 ksi Long term stress losses 11.56 ksi Final average stress 166.49 ksi Final average force in tendon 25.47 k Anchor set influence from left pull (181.06ksi; .671) 25.66 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .OOksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 1.92 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 1.92 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .074704 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 2.29 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .38 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .671; Max along tendon .671 Page 20 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/2212008 Time: 11:18 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 134' BAND P8 1.2 FILE NAME : 134' BAND P8 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] 180.0 177.5 175.0 172.5 170.0 167.5 165.0 162.5 Span 1 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 4.0 - 3.5 3.0 2.5 - 2.0 - 1.5 - 1.0 - a,2 _ 25 Stressing End ad End Span 1 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 178.04 ksi Long term stress losses 11.56 ksi Final average stress 166.49 ksi Final average force in tendon 25.47 k Anchor set influence from left pull (181.06ksi; .671) 25.66 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 1.92 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 1.92 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .074704 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 2.29 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .38 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES rage z i or 6 f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:18:31 P R O J E C T T I T.L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 149' ADD P8 L 0 N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 105.87 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. % Volume to surface ratio of member 6.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .434 ksi Shrinkage 5.103 ksi Creep 1.202 ksi Relaxation 4.021 ksi Total long-term stress losses 10.760 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 22 of 87 I LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (149' ADD P8) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3- ---4------5------6-------7----8--- -9------ 10------ 11------ 12- CAN 5.25 1 4.25 7.00 .05 186.82 190.02 1 30.00 1 7.00 1.00 10.50 .08 .50 .08 190.02 194.01 198.49 2 31.00 1 10.50 1.00 10.50 .08 .50 .08 198.49 199.30 194.98 3 27.33 1 10.50 1.00 10.50 .08 .50 .08 194.98 190.20 186.11 CAN 8.25 1 10.50 6.00 .05 186.11 182.48 101.83 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) . 193.35 ksi Long term stress losses . 10.76 ksi Final average stress . 182.59 ksi Final average force in tendon . 27.94 k Anchor set inf luence from left pull (201.41ksi; .746) 42.47 ft Anchor set inf luence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set . 8.26 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set . .00 inch Total elongati on after anchor set . 8.26 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon l ength after anchor set . .081125 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set . 8.51 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set . .25 inch Jacking force . 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .692; Max along tendon .746 Page 23 of 87 I ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE S) E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, It Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:18 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 149' ADD P8 1.2 FILE NAME : 149' ADD P8 2 - I ENDON STRESSES [ksi] Crl.~f..... I- 200 195 190 185 180 175 Left Cantilever Span 1 - - . 1 I I CIfTI - -IIIIIIWIWIWIIILJ._L_ l~_1-I~_IJJ I JJ_I I ! I 1-L_I_L1 LLLI Span 2 S 3 - TENDON PROFILE [in] 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -4.25 7 7 10. '0.5 10. 0.5 I - ~ I S s ing nd - www wu I Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Sp. 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) Long term stress losses Final average stress Final average force in tendon Anchor set influence from left pull (201.41ksi; .746) . Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) . Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES 193.35 ksi 10.76 ksi 182.59 ksi 27.94 k 42.47 ft .00 ft o.to incn .00 inch 8.26 inch 081125 inch/ft 8.51 inch .25 inch 33.05 kips Page 24 of 87 ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:19:12 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 149' ADD P9 L 0 N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 105.87 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 6.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .434 ksi Shrinkage 5.103 ksi Creep 1.202 ksi Relaxation - 4.021 ksi Total long-term stress losses 10.760 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch'2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 25 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (149' ADD P9) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right Xl/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8--- -9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- 1 22.50 1 6.00 1.00 10.50 .08 .50 .08 185.54 189.12 193.71 2 20.00 1 10.50 1.00 6.00 .08 .50 .08 193.71 199.23 199.09 42.50 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 193.68 ksi Long term stress losses 10.76 ksi Final average stress 182.92 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.99 k Anchor set influence from left pull (200.77ksi; .744) 37.76 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .0oksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 3.45 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 3.45 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .081265 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 3.70 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .737; Max along tendon .744 Page 26 of 87 i ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST PO ST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:19 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 149' ADD P9 1.2 FILE NAME : 149' ADD P9 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Low-Term Losses 200 - - 195 - 190 185 - 180 - - - - - 175 - - - Span 1 Span 2 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 11 6 10..5 10.5 6 10 - 9 - 8 - _ Stressing-End- Dead-End- 7 6 j- _ 5 4 _ " 3 - ~ i 2 - 0 Span 1 Span 2 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 193.68 ksi Long term stress losses Final average stress 10.76 182.92 ksi ksi Final average force in tendon Anchor set influence from left pull (200.77ksi; .744) 27.99 37.76 k ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 3.45 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set .00 3.45 inch inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .081265 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force 3.70 .25 33.05 inch inch kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 1"/ of 8"/ ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:20:07 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 210' BAND P1 L 0 N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 253.55 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o volume to surface ratio of member 4.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.039 ksi Shrinkage 6.060 ksi Creep 2.879 ksi Relaxation 4.371 ksi Total long-term stress losses 14.348 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch^2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 28 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (210' BAND P1) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right Xl/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8-- --9------- - 10------ 11------ 12- 1 26.91 1 4.25 4.25 7.00 .08 .50 .08 192.35 194. 66 197.59 2 17.41 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 197.59 201. 67 203 06 3 8.33 1 7.00 6.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 203.06 201. . 13 199 71 4 16.50 1 7.00 5.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 199.71 197. . 42 195 38 CAN 5.50 1 7.00 4.25 .00 195.38 . 192.53 74.65 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 197.56 ksi Long term stress losses 14.35 ksi Final average stress 183.21 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.03 k Anchor set influence from left pull (204.17ksi; .756) 42.62 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 6.19 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 6.19 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082892 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 6.44 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .724; Max along tendon .756 Page 29 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:20 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 210' BAND P1 1.2 FILE NAME : 210' BAND P1 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] 205 200 195 190 185 180 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 5 5 4 3 2 1 0 r opan 3 Span 4 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) Long term stress losses 197.56 ksi Final average stress 14.35 ksi • „ Final average force in tendon . " " 163.21 ksi Anchor set influence from left pull (204 17k i 26.03 k . s ; .756) Anchor set influence from right pull ( OOksi 42.62 ft . ; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set 6.19 inch Total elongation after anchor set " " 00 inch Ratio of total elongation to 6.19 inch tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set 062692 inch/ft Elongation at ri ht 5 pull before anchor set 6.44 inch Jacking force .25 inch 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 30 of 87 r bpan 3 Span 4 Right Cantilever ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. ATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:20:43 P R O J E C T T I T L E; FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E: 210' BAND P2 L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system Type of strand Ultimate strength of strand Modulus of elasticity of strand Estimate of initial average compression Concrete strength at 28 days Average weight of concrete Estimated age of concrete at stressing Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days Estimate of average relative humidity Volume to surface ratio of member UNBONDED LOW LAX 270.00 ksi 28600.00 ksi 253.55 psi 5000.00 psi NORMAL 3 days 3490.50 ksi 4030.50 ksi 60. o 4.00 in CALCULATED VALUES Elastic shortening Shrinkage 1.039 ksi Creep 6.060 ksi Relaxation 2.879 ksi 4.371 ksi Total long-term stress losses 14.348 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu)................ Coefficient of wobble friction (K).... •06000 /radian Ultimate strength of strand . " " ' •00080 rad/ Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength 270.80 k Anchor set Cross-sectional area of strand •25 inch Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1.153 inch 2 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 31 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (210' BAND P2) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal SPAN ft P ratios - start center right X1/L X2/L -1_---2---- X3 L / < STRESS (ksi) -3----4-_____ 9------ start cen --10--- ter right 1 27.00 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 08 11 ------12- . .50 2 13.00 1 7.00 6.00 7.00 08 50 3 .08 191.20 194 .41 198.12 . 34.33 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 CAN 5 50 .08 08 198.12 200. 04 201.61 . 1 7.00 4.25 .00 . 201.61 201. 47 197.64 - 197.64 194.69 79.83 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) Long term stress losses 198.34 ksi Final average stress " " " " ' 14.35 ksi Final average force in tendon . 183.99 ksi Anchor set influence from left pull (203 60ksi A h " ' 28.15 k . ; nc or set influence from right pull ( .754) 47.08 ft .OOksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongatio f 6.64 inch n a ter anchor set Ratio of total elongation to . " " " 00 6.64 inch inch tendon length after anchor set Elongation t a left pull before anchor set Elongation t 083219 inch/ft a ri ht 9 pull before anchor set Jacking force 6.89 inch 25 inch 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .732; Max alon g te ndon .754 Page 32 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:20 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 210' BAND P2 1.2 FILE NAME : 210' BAND P2 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Cr. N... 1 200 195 190 185 180 Lon -term posses _ I i ~J,-'-LLL ~J-~~J-~ -L-LI11llWWllLl111 vV... , 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 6 5 4 3 2 1 n opan z Span 3 Right Cantilever apan Span 2 Span 3 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 198.34 ksi Long term stress losses 14.35 ksi Final average stress 183.99 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.15 k Anchor set influence from left pull (203.60ksi; .754) 47.08 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 6.64 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.64 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .083219 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 6.89 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Right Cantilever Page 33 of 87 ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:21:18 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 210' BAND P4 L 0 N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 253.55 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 4.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.039 ksi Shrinkage 6.060 ksi Creep 2.879 ksi Relaxation 4.371 ksi Total long-term stress losses 14.348 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) Coefficient of wobble friction (K) Ultimate strength of strand Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength Anchor set Cross-sectional area of strand Total Number of Strands per Tendon STRESSING .06000 /radian .00080 rad/ft 270.00 ksi .80 .25 inch .153 inch"2 1 AT LEFT END Page 34 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (210' BAND P4) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9------- - 10------ 11-- 12- 1 27.00 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 190.77 193.98 197.69 2 24.66 1 7.00 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 197.69 201.76 202.14 51.66 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 197.57 ksi Long term stress losses 14.35 ksi Final average stress 183.22 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.03 k Anchor set influence from left pull (203.39ksi; .753) 46.74 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 4.28 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 4.28 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082895 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 4.53 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .749; Max along tendon .753 Page 35 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:21 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 210' BAND P4 1.2 FILE NAME : 210' BAND P4 2 -TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses 200 - - - - 195 190 - - - - 185 } - - I 180 j - Span 1 Span 2 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 7 A:.26 7 7. 4,25- , 6 5 --Stressing-End Dead-End- I 4- 3 2 1 0 Span 1 Span 2 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 197.57 ksi Long term stress losses 14.35 ksi Final average stress 183.22 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.03 k Anchor set influence from left pull (203.39ksi; .753) 46.74 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 4.28 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 4.28 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082895 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 4.53 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 36 of 87 ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:21:55 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 226' BAND P6 L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 245.37 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o volume to surface ratio of member 6.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.005 ksi Shrinkage 5.103 ksi Creep 2.786 ksi Relaxation 4.180 ksi Total long-term stress losses 13.074 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch'2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 37 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (226' BAND P6) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right Xl/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8--- -9-------- 10--- 11--- 12- 1 30.16 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 190.72 194.11 197.93 2 14.66 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 197.93 202.31 200.65 3 14.50 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 200.65 196.17 192.56 CAN 3.50 1 7.00 4.25 .00 192.56 188.68 62.82 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 196.13 ksi Long term stress losses 13.07 ksi Final average stress 183.05 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.01 k Anchor set influence from left pull (203.36ksi; .753) 39.89 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 5.17 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.17 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set . 082291 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 5.42 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .713; Max along tendon .753 Page 38 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsofI.com. Web site: www .adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION. INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:22 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 226' BAND P6 1.2 FILE NAME : 226' BAND P6 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses I L_o_ng-Term Losses - 200 - _ 195 T I - - - 190 - ~ 185 180 175 Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Right Cantilever 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 25 4 -4-25- 7 - - i 6 i E = ead- - d 5 - Stress ng- n 4 i 3 2 • 1 -T I _ , uwwu 0 Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 196.13 ksi Long term stress losses Final average stress 13.07 ksi 183.05 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.01 k Anchor set influence from left pull (203.36ksi; .753) 39.89 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( Ooksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set 5.17 inch .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.17 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082291 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 5.42 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Fage.39 of 6 / c ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com - ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:22:34 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 226' BAND P7 L 0 N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 245.37 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 6.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.005 ksi Shrinkage 5.103 ksi Creep 2.786 ksi Relaxation 3.251 ksi Total long-term stress losses 12.145 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 40 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (226' BAND P7) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2---- -3- ---4------5----- -6----- --7----8----9------ 10---- 11------ 12- 1 17.50 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 180.78 183.66 187.35 CAN 5.00 1 7.00 4.25 .00 187.35 190.80 22.50 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 185.15 ksi Long term stress losses 12.15 ksi Final average stress 173.00 ksi Final average force in tendon 26.47 k Anchor set influence from left pull (190.8oksi; .707) 22.50 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 1.75 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 1.75 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .077685 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 2.00 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .707; Max along tendon .707 Page 41 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST PO ST-TENSION , INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:22 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 226' BAND P7 1.2 FILE NAME : 226' BAND P7 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Lonng-Term Losses - 190.0 187.5 185.0 - - - - - 182.5 180.0 - 177.5 - - - 175.0 - - - " - 172.5 _ 170.0 Span 1 Right Cantilever 3 - TENDON PROFILE [in] 25- - - -4 Ff - -~}.z5=: - 7 : _ 6 5 - / tressing-E-nd r - Dead-E-nd 4 = \ 3 2 - - 1 i 0 i Span 1 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 185.15 ksi Long term stress losses Final average stress 12.15 173.00 ksi ksi Final average force in tendon 26.47 k Anchor set influence from left pull (190.80ksi; .707) 22.50 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .0oksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 1.75 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 1.75 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .077685 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force 2.00 .25 33.05 inch inch kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 42 of 87 ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:23:25 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 226' BAND P8 L 0 N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 245.37 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 6.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.005 ksi Shrinkage 5.103 ksi Creep 2.786 ksi Relaxation 3.715 ksi Total long-term stress losses 12.610 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) Coefficient of wobble friction (K) Ultimate strength of strand Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength Anchor set Cross-sectional area of strand Total Number of Strands per Tendon STRESSING .06000 /radian .00080 rad/ft 270.00 ksi .80 .25 inch .153 inch'2 1 AT LEFT END Page 43 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (226' BAND P8) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3- ---4------5------6------ -7-- --8----9------- - 10------ 11- 12- 1 25.00 1 4.25 1.00 10.50 .08 .50 .08 187.34 190.45 194.98 2 15.00 1 10.50 2.00 10.50 .08 .50 .08 194.98 200.69 197.95 3 20.00 1 10.50 1.00 10.50 .08 .50 .08 197.95 192. 52 188.20 4 27.00 1 10.50 1.00 10.50 .08 .50 .08 188.20 183. 40 179.46 CAN 4.50 1 10.50 6.00 .00 179.46 175.06 91.50 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 189.71 ksi Long term stre ss losses 12.61 ksi Final average stress 177.11 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.10 k Anchor set inf luence from left pull ( 201. 67ksi; .747) 34.36 ft Anchor set inf luence from right pull ( OOksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor s et . 7.28 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongati on after anchor set 7.28 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon l ength after anchor set . .079601 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 7.53 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .694; Max along tendon .747 Page 44 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:23 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 226' BAND P8 1.2 FILE NAME : 226' BAND P8 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses r - - 200 - - - 195 - - - 190 - - 185 - - - I - 180 = _ 175 170 - 165 - _L_l L I i I_11J I wuulwun- Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Right Cantilever 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 11 =4.25 10.0.5 10.0.5 10. 10.'10.5 6 10 9 8 ead 7 6 gStressing 5- 3 2 _ 1 1 ~ ~ uw 0 Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) Long term stress losses Final average stress Final average force in tendon Anchor set influence from left pull (201.67ksi; 189.71 12.61 177.11 27.10 .747) 34.36 ksi ksi ksi k ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .0oksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set 7.28 .00 7.28 inch inch inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force .079601 7.53 .25 33.05 inch/ft inch inch kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES rdgc ur 0 i ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:24:04 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 226' BAND P9 L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 245.37 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. $ Volume to surface ratio of member 6.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.005 ksi Shrinkage 5.103 ksi Creep 2.786 ksi Relaxation 4.180 ksi Total long-term stress losses 13.074 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch'2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 46 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (226' BAND P9) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1-- --2-----3 ----4------ 5------6---- ---7----8----9------ 10--- 11------ 12- 1 22.50 1 6.00 1.00 10.50 .08 .50 .08 186.18 189.76 194.35 2 24.66 1 10.50 1.00 6.00 .08 .50 .08 194.35 199.63 199.26 47.16 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 194.66 ksi Long term stress losses 13.07 ksi Final average stress 181.59 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.78 k Anchor set influence from left pull (201.09ksi; .745) 40.71 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .738; Max along tendon .745 3.85 inch .00 inch 3.85 inch 081677 inch/ft 4.10 inch .25 inch 33.05 kips Page 47 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST PO ST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:24 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 226' BAND P9 1.2 FILE NAME : 226' BAND P9 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses - - - 200 - - - 195 - r. - 190 - - I - 185 180- - - - i r 175 Span 1 Span 2 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 11 6 10,510.5 6 10 - I 9 8 7 Stressing- adEnd 6 _ 5 4 3 2 1 0 Span 1 Span 2 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) Long term stress losses Final average stress Final average force in tendon Anchor set influence from left pull (201.09ksi; .745) 194.66 ksi 13.07 ksi 181.59 ksi 27.78 k 40.71 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set 3.85 inch .00 inch 3.85 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force .081677 inch/ft 4.10 inch .25 inch 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES rage 46 01 6 i l ~ ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:24:48 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 264' BAND P1 L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 335.11 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. Volume to surface ratio of member 4.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.373 ksi Shrinkage 6.060 ksi Creep 3.805 ksi Relaxation 4.323 ksi Total long-term stress losses 15.561 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch-2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 49 of 87 ► ' l LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (264' BAND Pl) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8--- -9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- 1 26.91 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 190.79 194.00 197.70 2 25.75 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 197.70 201.79 201.44 3 16.50 1 7.00 5.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 201.44 198.99 196.94 CAN 5.50 1 7.00 4.25 .00 196.94 194.06 74.66 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 197.74 ksi Long term stress losses 15.56 ksi Final average stress 182.18 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.87 k Anchor set influence from left pull (203.39ksi; .753) 46.16 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .0oksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 6.19 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 6.19 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082970 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 6.44 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .729; Max along tendon .753 Page 50 of 87 f A ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www .adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:25 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 264' BAND P1 1.2 FILE NAME : 264' BAND P1 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses - - - 200 - - - .--I i _.J 195 - i - 190 - 185 - - 180 _ - - - 175 Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Right Cantilever 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] - - - n - -a-z~ 7 - =a:z5 - - - om , 6 5 _Stressing-E-nd Dea - d- 4 i i 1 3 i - I 2 I 1 0 Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) Long term stress losses Final average stress Final average force in tendon Anchor set influence from left pull (203.39ksi; .753) Anchor set influence from right pull ( .0oksi; .000) 197.74 15.56 182.18 27.87 46.16 .00 ksi ksi ksi k ft ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set 6.19 .00 6.19 inch inch inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force .082970 6.44 .25 33.05 inch/ft inch inch kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES rage 5 t or 87 - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:25:23 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 264' BAND P2 L 0 N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 335.11 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. % volume to surface ratio of member 4.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.373 ksi Shrinkage 6.060 ksi Creep 3.805 ksi Relaxation 4.323 ksi Total long-term stress losses 15.561 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch'2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 52 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (264' BAND P2) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right Xl/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2 3----4------5------6-------7----8--- -9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- 1 27.00 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 191.22 194.43 198.14 2 33.00 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 198.14 202.46 200.94 CAN 5.50 1 7.00 4.25 .00 200.94 197.93 65.50 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 198.46 ksi Long term stress losses 15.56 ksi Final average stress 182.90 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.98 k Anchor set influence from left pull (203.61ksi; .754) 48.81 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 5.45 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.45 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .083268 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 5.70 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .744; Max along tendon .754 Page 53 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:25 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 264' BAND P2 1.2 FILE NAME : 264' BAND P2 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses 205 - - _ - Long- Term Losses 200 - _ ~ - - - _ _ _ - 195 190 - - 185 - i - ' 180 - 175~~-~u_-~ - - - - - - - ~-sue- ' J Span 1 Span 2 Right Cantilever 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 7 -=425 a-2 6 5 - ~tressing-En +Dea -nd - 4 r \ 1 3 2 ~ I 0 Span 1 Span 2 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) Long term stress losses Final average stress Final average force in tendon Anchor set influence from left pull (203.61ksi; .754) Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) 198.46 15.56 182.90 27.98 48.81 .00 ksi ksi ksi k ft ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set Ratio of total elongation to 5.45 .00 5.45 inch inch inch tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force .083268 5.70 .25 33.05 inch/ft inch inch kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 54 of 87 - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:26:07 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 264' BAND P4 L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I 0 N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 335.11 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. $ Volume to surface ratio of member 4.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.373 ksi Shrinkage 6.060 ksi Creep 3.805 ksi Relaxation 3.640 ksi Total long-term stress losses 14.878 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch^2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 55 of 87 , ' LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (264' BAND P4) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start cent er right -1----2-----3- ---4------5------6-------7----8--- -9------- -10------11 -12- 1 27.00 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 190.69 193. 90 197.61 2 24.08 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 197.61 201. 67 201.48 3 33.00 1 7.00 1.00 53.00 .08 .50 .08 201.48 197. 29 186.37 4 33.50 1 53.00 4.00 30.00 .08 .50 .08 186.37 173. 66 167.20 117.58 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 190.46 ksi Long term stre ss losses 14.88 ksi Final average stress 175.58 ksi Final average force in tendon 26.86 k Anchor set inf luence from left pull (203.34ksi; .753) 45.36 ft Anchor set inf luence from right pull ( 00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 9.40 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongati on after anchor set 9.40 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon l ength after anchor set .079913 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 9.65 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .706; Max along tendon .753 Page 56 of 87 0 4 1 . ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:26 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 264' BAND P4 1.2 FILE NAME : 264' BAND P4 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] 200 190 180 170 160 150 Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 ang-Term Losses__ i i Span 4 j 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 50 40 30 20 10 0 4.25 7? 5 3 30 I I Dead End i i i i -Stressing-En Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 190.46 ksi Long term stress losses 14.88 ksi Final average stress 175.58 ksi Final average force in tendon 26.86 k Anchor set influence from left pull (203.34ksi; .753) 45.36 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 9.40 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 9.40 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .079913 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 9.65 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 57 of 87 J , . ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:27:12 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 280' BAND P1 L 0 N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 253.55 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. u Volume to surface ratio of member 4.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.039 ksi Shrinkage 6.060 ksi Creep 2.879 ksi Relaxation 4.371 ksi Total long-term stress losses 14.348 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 58 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (280' BAND P1) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8-- --9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- 1 42.00 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 193.67 197.84 202.28 2 20.00 1 7.00 2.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 202.28 203.79 200.60 CAN 5.50 1 7.00 4.25 .00 - 200.60 197.51 - 67.50 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 199.51 ksi Long term stress losses 14.35 ksi Final average stress 185.16 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.33 k Anchor set influence from left pull (204.83ksi ; .759) 48.34 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi ; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 5.65 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.65 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .083709 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 5.90 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .743; Max along tendon .759 Page 59 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST P OST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:27 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 280' BAND P1 1.2 FILE NAME : 280' BAND P1 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses 205 - - - - - - - - - 200 - 195 - - 190 - I - - 185 - - 180 - Span 1 Span 2 Right Cantilever 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] - - - 42~ 7 7 ~5 - - - - - - - - - 6 Dea ~d 5 - --Stressing-End 4- 3 _ / 2 1 _ ILllll 0 Span 1 Span 2 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 199.51 ksi Long term stress losses 14.35 ksi Final average stress 185.16 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.33 k Anchor set influence from left pull (204.83ksi; .759) 48.34 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 5.65 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.65 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .083709 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 5.90 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES rage 60 or 6 r , I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:27:50 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 280' BAND P2 L 0 N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 253.55 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. % Volume to surface ratio of member 4.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.039 ksi Shrinkage 6.060 ksi Creep 2.879 ksi Relaxation 4.371 ksi Total long-term stress losses 14.348 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) Coefficient of wobble friction (K) Ultimate strength of strand Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength Anchor set Cross-sectional area of strand Total Number of Strands per Tendon STRESSING .06000 /radian .00080 rad/ft 270.00 ksi .80 .25 inch .153 inch"2 1 AT LEFT END Page 61 of 87 e+ s LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (280' BAND P2) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/1, X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7-- --8----9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- 1 27.00 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 190.81 194.03 197.74 2 25.75 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 197.74 201.82 201.43 3 32.50 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 201.43 197.28 193.62 CAN 5.50 1 7.00 4.25 .00 193.62 190.71 90.75 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 197.17 ksi Long term stress losses 14.35 ksi Final average stress 182.82 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.97 k Anchor set influence from left pull (203. 41ksi; .753) 46.17 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( . 00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set . 7.51 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 7.51 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082728 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 7.76 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .717; Max along tendon .753 Page 62 of 87 1 1 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT VerA.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:28 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 280' BAND P2 1.2 FILE NAME : 280' BAND P2 2 -TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses _ 200 - T 195 - - 190 - ~I _ I ~ 185 - - = I 180 _ - _L-J~J~lJ-1._I u~J_1J~.1-1_J__LJJJ-~ i _Li ~ - uIJUUUUUwwwL Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Right Cantilever 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] - -25- 6 i 5 I /Stressing-Eind D i - - 0 ' Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 197.17 ksi Long term stress losses 14.35 ksi Final average stress 182.82 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.97 k Anchor set influence from left pull (203.41ksi; .753) 46.17 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 7.51 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 7.51 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082728 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 7.76 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES i rage b.) of 6 A $ 1 . ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:28:42 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 280' BAND P4 L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 253.55 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. % Volume to surface ratio of member 4.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.039 ksi Shrinkage 6.060 ksi Creep 2.879 ksi Relaxation 4.141 ksi Total long-term stress losses 14.118 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) 06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 64 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (280' BAND P4) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right Xl/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8--- -9------ 10------ 11--- 12- 1 27.00 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 190.71 193.92 197.63 2 24.33 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 197.63 201.69 201.48 3 18.83 1 7.00 4.25 7.00 .08 .50 .08 201.48 198.66 196.27 4 13.91 1 7.00 5.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 196.27 194.04 192.10 5 32.91 1 7.00 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 192.10 188.23 185.18 116.98 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) . 194.69 ksi Long term stress losses . 14.12 ksi Final average stress . 180.57 ksi Final average force in tendon . 27.63 k Anchor set influence from left pull (203.35ksi; .753) 45.49 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set . 9.56 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set . .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set . 9.56 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set . .081687 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set . 9.81 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set . .25 inch Jacking force . 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .706; Max along tendon .753 Page 65 of 87 a , I ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST P OST-TENSION , INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:28 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 280' BAND P4 1.2 FILE NAME : 280' BAND P4 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses _ Long-Term Losses 200 - - - - 195 190 - 185 180 175 - - 170 Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Span 5 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] - 7 - =435- - - - _ - 7 - - - 4.26- - 6- - - 5 stressing-En r' eadEnd- - 4 I 3 i 2 I - I 0 Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Span 5 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) Long term stress losses Final average stress Final average force in tendon Anchor set influence from left pull (203.35ksi; .753) 194.69 14.12 180.57 27.63 45.49 ksi ksi ksi k ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set 9.56 .00 9.56 inch inch inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .081687 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force 9.81 .25 33.05 inch inch kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 66 018 / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:30:12 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 174' UNI P3 L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 197.45 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. e Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .809 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.242 ksi Relaxation 4.176 ksi Total long-term stress losses 13.167 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch^2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 67 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (174' UNI P3) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9--------10------11------12- CAN 6.00 1 4.25 7.50 .05 187.82 191.23 1 32.50 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 191.23 195.42 199.39 2 32.50 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 199.39 200.15 196.34 3 28.91 1 7.50 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 196.34 192.35 189.44 99.91 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 195.56 ksi Long term stress losses 13.17 ksi Final average stress 182.39 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.91 k Anchor set influence from left pull (201.91ksi; .748) 46.76 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 8.20 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 8.20 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082053 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 8.45 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .702; Max along tendon .748 Page 68 of 87 1 . ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:30 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 174' UNI P3 1.2 FILE NAME : 174' UNI P3 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] 200 195 190 185 180 175 Left Cantilever 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 -4.25 7. .5 7. .5 7.:.5 4.25 _ I pSSip E I -Dead-End- g Span 2 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) Long term stress losses Final average stress Final average force in tendon Anchor set influence from left pull (201.91ksi; .748) . Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) . Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES 195.56 ksi 13.17 ksi 182.39 ksi 27.91 k 46.76 ft .00 ft 8.20 inch .00 inch 8.20 inch 082053 inch/ft 8.45 inch .25 inch 33.05 kips Span 3 Page 69 of 8 i . ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:30:51 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 174' UNI P4 L 0 N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 197.45 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. 11 Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .809 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.242 ksi Relaxation 4.408 ksi Total long-term stress losses 13.399 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch'2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 70 of 87 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (174' UNI P4) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8--- -9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- 1 17.33 1 4.25 3.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 189.44 191.47 194.61 2 28.00 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 194.61 198.95 202.72 3 26.50 1 7.50 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 202.72 198.60 195.73 71.83 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 197.12 ksi Long term stress losses 13.40 ksi Final average stress 183.72 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.11 k Anchor set influence from left pull (202.72ksi; .751) 45.33 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 5.94 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.94 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082706 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 6.19 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .725; Max along tendon .751 Page 71 of 87 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:31 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 174' UNI P4 1.2 FILE NAME : 174' UNI P4 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Lon~c -Term Losses ~ - ` 200 - - - - 195 - - - 190 185 180 175 Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] -4.25 7.57,5 7 7.5 4.25 7 6 S ead.Enrl 5 tressing-End / - \ 4 - 3 2 0 Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 197.12 ksi Long term stress losses 13.40 ksi Final average stress 183.72 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.11 k Anchor set influence from left pull (202.72ksi; .751) 45.33 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .0oksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 5.94 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.94 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082706 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 6.19 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES r rage /L ui 0 r ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:31:47 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 180' UNI P3 L 0 N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 197.45 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. c Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .809 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.242 ksi Relaxation 4.176 ksi Total long-term stress losses 13.167 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) Coefficient of wobble friction (K) Ultimate strength of strand Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength Anchor set Cross-sectional area of strand Total Number of Strands per Tendon STRESSING .06000 /radian .00080 rad/ft 270.00 ksi .80 .25 inch .153 inch^2 1 AT LEFT END Page 73 of 87 A ,I • LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (180' UNI P3) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7-- --8----9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- CAN 4.00 1 4.25 7.50 .05 186.85 191.08 1 10.58 1 7.50 7.50 7.50 .08 .50 .08 191.08 191.97 192.86 2 32.50 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 192.86 197.01 200.93 3 29.25 1 7.50 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 200.93 197.80 194.80 76.33 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 196.19 ksi Long term stress losses 13.17 ksi Final average stress 183.02 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.00 k Anchor set influence from left pull (201. 43ksi; .746) 48.06 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( . 00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set . 6.28 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 6.28 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082317 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 6.53 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .721; Max along tendon .746 Page 74 of 87 A " . ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION , INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:32 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 180' UNI P3 1.2 FILE NAME : 180' UNI P3 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long Term Losses 200 - - - - 190 - 185 180 _ I - 175 Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 4.257. 5 ,5 7,5 7,5 4.25 7 I 6 $i End Dead-End 5 ng- res 4 3 i 2 0 wuu Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 196.19 ksi Long term stress losses 13.17 ksi Final average stress 183.02 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.00 k Anchor set influence from left pull (201.43ksi; .746) 48.06 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 6.28 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 6.28 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082317 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 6.53 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force .25 33.05 inch kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page oT 6 / it r ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:32:21 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 180' UNI P4 L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 197.45 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .809 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.242 ksi Relaxation 3.063 ksi Total long-term stress losses 12.054 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 76 of 87 A 'V 6 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (180' UNI P4) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right Xl/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8--- -9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- CAN 14.00 1 4.25 7.50 .05 185.81 189.23 1 13.83 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 189.23 193.81 197.94 2 28.00 1 7.50 1.00 46.50 .08 .50 .08 197.94 199.42 188.52 3 28.00 1 46.50 1.00 46.50 .08 .50 .08 188.52 175.19 165.35 4 17.91 1 46.50 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 165.35 150.82 148.49 101.74 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 181.61 ksi Long term stress losses 12.05 ksi Final average stress 169.56 ksi Final average force in tendon 25.94 k Anchor set influence from left pull (200.91ksi; .744) 35.61 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 7.75 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 7.75 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .076200 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 8.00 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .688; Max along tendon .744 Page 77 of 87 I AF ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:32 1- PROJECT TITLE: FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 180' UNI P4 1.2 FILE NAME : 180' UNI P4 12 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] I n n_ T- I n 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 11_111111111111_L1LJlIJ_I_I_Ll.ll_I_I /J ~L-1-IJ~LJ_Ll~ ~l~ 1 1 LL Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 3 - TENDON PROFILE [in] 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 4.25 7.57.5 7.5 7.5 46. 6.5 46. 6.5 4.25 I i i i ~ I I east-End Vessing-En Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 181.61 ksi Long term stress losses 12.05 ksi Final average stress 169.56 ksi Final average force in tendon 25.94 k Anchor set influence from left pull (200.91ksi; .744) 35.61 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( ooksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 7.75 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 7.75 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .076200 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 8.00 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES rage /n or 6) 4 s ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:33:02 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 267' UNI P3 L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 249.41 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. % Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.022 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.832 ksi Relaxation 4.147 ksi Total long-term stress losses 13.941 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 79 of 87 a A, 11 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (267' UNI P3) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8-- --9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- CAN 6.00 1 4.25 7.50 .05 187.82 191.23 1 32.50 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 191.23 195.42 199.39 2 32.50 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 199.39 200.15 196.34 3 16.16 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 196.34 192.15 188.55 CAN 6.00 1 7.50 4.25 .05 188.55 185.16 93.16 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 195.33 ksi Long term stress losses 13.94 ksi Final average stress 181.39 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.75 k Anchor set influence from left pull (201.91ksi ; .748) 46.76 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi ; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 7.64 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 7.64 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .081956 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 7.89 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .698; Max along tendon .748 Page 80 of 87 a ► ► ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:33 1- PROJECT TITLE: FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 267' UNI P3 1.2 FILE NAME : 267' UNI P3 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] FrirMinn I n 200 195 190 185 180 175 170 - Left Cantilever Span 1 I nnn_T- I = 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 7 6 5- 4 3 2 1 0 Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Right Cantilever Span 2 Span 3 Right Cantilever -4.25 7. 7,.5 7..x 7,.5 715^'. 5 7. .5 4.25 essi En ead- g- uuwuu 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) Long term stress losses Final average stress Final average force in tendon Anchor set influence from left pull (201.91ksi; .748) . Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) . Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES 195.33 ksi 13.94 ksi 181.39 ksi 27.75 k 46.76 ft .00 ft 7.64 inch .00 inch 7.64 inch 081956 inch/ft 7.89 inch .25 inch 33.05 kips Page 81 of 87 1 A ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:33:36 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 267' UNI P4 L 0 N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 249.41 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.022 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.832 ksi Relaxation 2.811 ksi Total long-term stress losses 12.605 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength BO Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 82 of 87 Y • LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (267' UNI P4) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1--- -2----- 3 ----4------ 5---- --6---- ---7--- -8--- -9------- - 10----- - 11---- 12- CAN 5.00 1 6.00 11.00 .05 172.88 178.06 1 13.66 1 11.00 5.00 11.00 .08 .50 .08 178.06 182.37 186.27 2 14.33 1 11.00 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 186.27 192.70 192.28 3 8.00 1 7.50 7.50 7.50 .08 .50 .08 192.28 191.14 190.53 4 12.08 1 7.50 5.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 190.53 188.25 186.14 5 19.33 1 7.50 4.25 7.50 .08 .50 .08 186.14 183.40 181.04 6 17.33 1 7.50 3.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 181.04 178.00 175.35 7 28.00 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 175.35 171.73 168.60 8 26.50 1 7.50 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 168.60 165.18 162.79 144.23 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 178.46 ksi Long term stress losses 12.60 ksi Final average stress 165.85 ksi Final average force in tendon 25.38 k Anchor set influence from left pull (194.44ksi; .720) 29.54 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( 00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 10.80 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 10.80 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .074877 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 11.05 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .640; Max along tendon .720 Page 83 of 87 A o ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:33 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 267' UNI P4 1.2 FILE NAME : 267' UNI P4 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] 195 190 185 180 175 170 165 160 155 150 Left Cantilevapan 1 1 3 - TENDON PROFILE [in] 10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0.0 Left Cantileve8pan 1 6 11 7.5 .5 7.57.5 7.5 .5 7.57.5 7.57.5 7.517.6 425 ' -X Dead End j 5 u 7.5 5 wwwuuwutiu 4.25 3 ~ Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Span 5 Span 6 Span 7 Span 8 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 178.46 ksi Long term stress losses 12.60 ksi Final average stress 165.85 ksi Final average force in tendon 25.38 k Anchor set influence from left pull (194.44ksi; .720) 29.54 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .0oksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 10.80 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 10.80 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .074877 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 11.05 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 84 of 8', Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Span 5 Span 6 Span 7 Span 8 - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Jan 22, 2008 TIME: 11:34:11 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 267' UNI P5 L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 249.41 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3490.50 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.022 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.832 ksi Relaxation 3.456 ksi Total long-term stress losses 13.250 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) Coefficient of wobble friction (K) Ultimate strength of strand Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength Anchor set Cross-sectional area of strand Total Number of Strands per Tendon STRESSING .06000 /radian .00080 rad/ft 270.00 ksi .80 .25 inch .153 inch''2 1 AT LEFT END Page 85 of 87 4 a * LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (267' UNI P5) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9--------10------11------12- CAN 5.25 1 6.00 11.00 .05 178.40 183.42 1 23.00 1 11.00 1.00 6.00 .08 .50 .08 183.42 188.48 191.79 28.25 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 186.65 ksi Long term stress losses 13.25 ksi Final average stress 173.40 ksi Final average force in tendon 26.53 k Anchor set influence from left pull (191.79ksi; .710) 28.25 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) 00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 2.21 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 2.21 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .078317 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 2.46 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .710; Max along tendon .710 Page 86 of 87 4 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1/22/2008 Time: 11:34 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS @ VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 26T UNI P5 1.2 FILE NAME : 267' UNI P5 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] 190 185 180 175 170 165 fmiction Losses LU119- I V1111 Wb=b Left Cantilever 1 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0.0 Span 1 6 6 - Stressing. - Dead End- - L Left Cantilever Span 1 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) Long term stress losses Final average stress Final average force in tendon Anchor set influence from left pull (191.79ksi; .710) . Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) . Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES 186.65 ksi 13.25 ksi 173.40 ksi 26.53 k 28.25 ft .00 ft 2.21 inch .00 inch 2.21 inch 078317 inch/ft 2.46 inch .25 inch 33.05 kips Page 87 of 87 SU f 1COAST January 21, 2008 Attn: Project Manager Layton Construction 9090 South Sandy Parkway Sandy, UT 84070- Re: Four SeasonsVailCO Gentlemen: Attached are :dill Certificates for the pre-stressing steel used fox: Level Level 3 / Pour Beam 3PT-1 SV NCOAST POST= TENSION A Keller Company Suncoast Post-Tension, L.P. 15422 Lillja Road Houston,Texas 77060 Tel: 281-445-8886 Fax: 281-445-9633 Web: www.suncoast-pt.com Manufacturer Coil Number American Spring Wire -910163802 American Spring Wire -910165802 Respectfully, SUNCOAST Post-Tension, L.P. Commercial Operations * For Your Records P11 PGSI Ti Ns! .'~G INITMU7 r ~l Austin,TX • Dallas,TX • Ft.Worth,TX . Houston,TX . San Antonio,TX . Denver, CO 14f LLE R Ontario, CA . San Diego, CA • Sacramento, CA . San Jose, CA as Vegas, NV . Reno, NV • Phoenix, AZ . Atlanta, GA • Miami, FL • Woodbridge,VA AN 14:43 AMERICAN SPRING WIRE CORP. Sales Order 98957 REV: 2 SKIP TO: SCPT PROCUREMENT, L.P. 15422 LILLJA ROAD HOUSTON TX 77060 American Spring Wire Corp. Shipment Packslip 11-27-07 SHEET 1 CUST ID: 31403 BOL # 600785 BILL TO: SCPT PROCUREMENT, L.P. 654 NORTH SAM HOUSTON PKWY SUITE 110 HOUSTON TX 77060 CUST P/O 70879 ! FREIGHT TERMS: PREPAY & FREIGHT ALLOWED SHIP VIA: TRUCK CARRIER: BEST WAY FOB: DESTINATION ITEM DUE DATE ORDERED SHIPPED ITEM / DESCRIPTION 0001 11-08-07 96,000 FT 95,011 FT 84797 STRAND, 1/2 270K LOW RELAX (NON-DOMESTIC) PACK-CODE: 51 P PAK PACKAGING: D4 G NO WRAP EYE O SIDE , LOT TOTAL * * KGS LBS PAK # 91016 01 HEAT:607804 11,973 FT 6,196 LB -g PAK # 91016 01 HEAT:607804 11,896 FT 6,156 LB -C PAK4 91016 02 HEAT:607804 11,834 FT 6,124 LB p PAK # 91016 , 701 HEAT:607804 11,888 FT 6,152 LB - 9 PAK # 91016 02 HEAT:607804 11,811 FT 6,112 LB - F PAK # 91016 01 HEAT:607804 11884 FT 6,150 LB 6 PAK # 91016 02 HEAT:607804 11,822 FT 6,118 LB q PAK # 91016 01 HEAT:607804 11,903 FT 6,160 LB * * LOT TOTA " * 95,011 FT TOTAL NUMBER PACKED: 8 NET TOTAL: 95,011 FT 49,168 LB DL I 0L__ DATE: ..J-ak0+ Q, -1 O623-- TIME IN:TIME OUT. - RECEIVED 9v: RECEIPT ~,2 Q v i v ~ N N W W A OI 'Coll CO 10" 40 ON a T O O O / O O O O O O O r N J V O~ N N O~ ILI, Z -4 CL y • ~ ao N g V Cr n c~ rD~ A ~ . 3 Cn W? on) cn ~ kit\ 2L fail m 3 3 -1 c c m m O O OTTMM pr=» On ~ c D o o m= E c C O M 0 DDDD c - c xc c 23.3 rrDD 3~~~~ ~z3! ~ c ° ~~cc o C 01 .~•r N N W vv.Niv Z 3 O M N fp 1~ d d M p (p Q Z 3 rt ..3 pr N and H ? X y W- w~ w 406 m -4 W o -pmmmm oornU=~~n IN C (O 00 CD - N V P O O A O V~ Q 0 0 0 0 Z O N W T "L a C W O OOf i► Of w C W W W W W w o N ~j N N N s 0 r O CD mco mm ~ n 0000 (n l._. W W W W O O O O D W 00 -4 O O O O DZ Z 1 American Spring Wire Corp. Shipment Packslip '5W I A,. 12:32 AMERICAN SPRING WIRE CORP. 11-28-07 SHEET 1 Sales Order 98958 REV: 2 CUST ID: 31403 BOIL # 600795 SHIP TO: SCPT PROCUREMENT, L.P. 15422 LILLJA ROAD HOUSTON TX 77060 BILL TO: SCPT PROCUREMENT, L.P. 654 NORTH SAM HOUSTON PKWY SUITE 110 HOUSTON TX 77060 CUST P/O 70879 J FREIGHT TERMS: PREPAY & FREIGHT ALLOWED SHIP VIA: TRUCK CARRIER: BEST WAY FOB: DESTINATION ITEM DUE DATE ORDERED. SHIPPED ITEM / DESCRIPTION 0001 11-12-07 96,000 FT 94,960 FT 84797 STRAND, 1/2 270K LOW RELAX (NON-DOMESTIC) PACK-CODE: 51 P PAK 'T~ PACKAGING: D4 G NO WRAP 7 1 EYE O SIDE a ~ ~ * * LOT TOTA * * KGS LBS PAK # 91016 02 HEAT:607804 11,845 FT 6,130 LB, PAK # 91016 02 HEAT:607804 11,880 FT 6,148 LB C PAK # 91016 01 HEAT:607804 11,919 FT 6,168 LB PAK # 91016 2 HEAT:607804 A 11,861 FT 6,138 LB PAK # 91016 01 HEAT:607804 11,903 FT 6,160 LB PAK # 91016 02 HEAT-607804 11,869 FT 6,142 LB ..,C3 PAK # 91016 02 HEAT:607804 11,838 FT 6,126 LB gyp.{ PAK # 91016 02 HEAT:607804 6k 11,845 FT 6,130 LB * * LOT TOTA * * 94 960 FT TOTAL NUM , ER PACKED: 8 NET TOTAL: 94,960 FT 49;142 LB ~ o QO N a _J9 , z U O04 04 OOO04 ~ n co oo (fl Z iLn&0Lr tv LLI(0 (D co CD a o Q N r r r r r t~ T N 0 0 0 0 0 C i rrrr •,•r Ico 0 M • U -j C~000a ~ ~ OOO NOO Q1 - VU) O ¢ . CL p M LO (fl N M CO M O O IA 8 U = LO LO LO U) d L 00 N O (O (U (O (O a N CO M N co O w 7 m r a to _ co. rrrr 0 O M f✓ co r r - f` 0- (-Z OOOO (O w co) N O (CO r U 4)0 N O r r r r r 00 h C1 M m~ 0 O r ~'a C O O O CO 0 r W co 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 e` M.4 r- f.: N N Q) - O N C Op ti N a s W N z Y~mcH H2 cn$ O c ed c C c EZ o*1 ~ici t E C4 ~ d Z g° O O yv EZ W YYYY E a s .J J£ O o Y r- m co 2 ti 0o ~C3 a a aa-(L0 v CO w w 3 F- as 0 n e a a O O O O Q O O C, w O O O O O O O O b O Cp C. -0 b O me -0 4* C3, 'if N N r- TOWN OF VA1L ' January 10, 2008 Four Seasons Layton Construction B06-0196 Revision 6 - RFI-0221, column re-location to match shop Drawings Revision 7 - RFI-0237, move sump pit $ 60.00 $ 60.00 TOTAL FEES DUE 120.00 f SAFEbuilt;nc COt ORAG0 Building Department Services November 15, 2007 Charlie Davis Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: PROJECT: PERMIT NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: INTERNAL REF ADDRESS: Dear Mr. Davis: RFI -0221 B06-0196 6 6057 1 Vail Road SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Building Code as adopted by the Town of Vail. SAFEbuilt Colorado finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction. Plans: Architect response to RFI -0221 Column re-location to match shop drawings. Plan review fee: $60.00 No additional square footage- No added valuation Sincerely, Matthew Royer Building Official SAFEbuilt Colorado mattxoyergSAFEbuilt coin ~FEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Page 1 of I tone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov b06-0196_rev6_FAL.doc LayVm Layton Construction Company Request For Information 9090 South Sandv Parkwav Sandv UT 84070 USA RFI-0221 CCWSTRLC77NG N7TR WTEGRIT, IL Printed On: 1011512007 Page 1 of 1 Subject: Column Location Date: 10/15/2007 Project: Four Seasons Vail Job: 06320 To: Hill Glazier Architects ;.r,;;•$: We Perkin Required: 10/22/2007 Address:One Vail Road Cost Impact: Potentially Vail, CO 81657 9&. Cost Amount: Phone: Fax: Proceed: No Entered By: Jeremy Becerra Schedule Impact: Potentially Days: Co-Author: Contact: Co-Author RFI Number: Reference: Request: Please refer to sheets S2.01.3, A2.01.3S and shop drawings for level one column C7 at grid lines A17 & 3.2. Please clarify the exact location of column C7 at the previously mentioned location. There seems to be a conflict between the architectural, structural and shop drawings as far as the location of column C7. Suggestion: Answer: ~L C2 Answered By: Date: b 671- I~ Z. n O-( pmXiO Signed: REVIEWED BY << NO) SAFEbuilt Colorado TOWN OF VAIN January 10, 2008 Four Seasons Layton Construction B06-0196 Revision 6 - RFI-0221, column re-location to match shop Drawings Revision 7 - RFI-0237, move sump pit TOTAL FEES DUE $ 60.00 $ 60.00 120.00 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R080000039 Amount: $120.00 01/11/200809:40 AM Payment Method: Check Init: JS Notation: 5131/MARK REED W/LAYTON REV. 6 & 7 Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 157,307.90 This Payment: $120.00 Total ALL Pmts: 157,307.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300, PLAN CK - project GFP012 120.00 SAFEbuilltinc, COLORADO Building Department Services November 15, 2007 Charlie Davis Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: PROJECT: PERMIT NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: INTERNAL REF ADDRESS: Dear Mr. Davis: RFI -0237 B06-0196 7 6058 1 Vail Road SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Building Code as adopted by the Town of Vail. SAFEbuilt Colorado finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction. Plans: Architect response to RFI -0237 Moving sump pit. Plan review fee: $60.00 No additional square footage- No added valuation Sincerely, *i~zt Matthew Royer Building Official SAFEbuilt Colorado matt. royer a,SAFEbuilt.com SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 v' Eagle, Colorado 81631 Page 1 of 1 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov b06-0196 rev? FAL.doc Layton Construction Company ' 9090 South Sandv Parkwav L"tW Sandv UT 84070 USA cwvsraucnkc n^n, iNr,:Ga!-r Town of Vai! 4s~ Subject: Storm and Sanitary Pits Project: Four Seasons Vail ^ I . Gy To: Hill Glazier Architects Mike Perkin Address:One Vail Road Vail, CO 81657 Phone: Entered By: Shawn Burton Fax: Request For Information RFI-0237 Pnnted On: 10129/2007 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/29/2007 Job: 06320 Required: 1 1 /05/2007 Cost Impact: Potentially Cost Amount: Proceed: No Schedule Impact: Potentially Days: Co-Author: Contact: Co-Author RFI Number: Reference: Request, Due to existing conditions in the field, modifications to the sanitary and storm sump pits on the east side of the first floor parking structure are being proposed. Please confirm that the changes shown in the attached sketch are acceptable. Suggestion: J' 00 Answerodt ►~t~1 i I / 1 o~ t ~e 1 a c~t~ ► a t S Qcc.~eb~ C _cx~rhih 4H 4 I ~ nn -}b ve. -6-Tv 4-t1 cc e ✓1 G c SS q vJ- l CAI' a V1 lnl~ Answered By: H "n C ~ Z7 •Fcv~`f ✓1 Date: Oz t 6J Z col p 3010 Signed: SAFFbulltinc. December 27, 2007 Charlie Davis Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: PROJECT: PERMIT NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: INTERNAL REF ADDRESS: Dear Mr. Davis: COLORADO Building Department Services Four Seasons B06-0196 11 6267 1 Vail Road SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed only for Engineering and Architectural Stamps. Plans: 5 sheets, 7048-33 thru 7048-37 Plan review fee: $0.00 No additional square footage- No added valuation Sincere " John Plano Plans Examiner / Senior Building Inspector SAFEbuilt Colorado fo hn.planoASAFEbuilt.com G~ i Page 1 of I SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Season s\tov-B06-0196 revI l_FAL.doc F PROJECT: FOUR SEP LOCATION: VAIL CONTRACTOR: LAYTC EXCEPTIONS TAKEN DATE: 12 lb -lo-T MAKE CORRECTIONS NOTED VISE AS NOTED AND RESUBMIT tEJECTED / RESUBMIT AS SPECIFIED VIEWED FOR LOAD TO STRUCTURE ONLY BMITTED PREVIOUSLY: Not Reviewed • Reviewed, identified additional data only Not ions Do Not Authorize Changes To contract sum. Sob ttal was reviewed for structural design conformity and gen if conformance to contract documents only. Contractor is res sible for confirming and correlating dimensions at job site r tolerances, clearances, quantities, fabrication processes and hniques of construction, coordination of his work with oth rades and full compliance with contract documents. Dar By NISHKIAN ~1ENNINGER Consulting & Structural Engineers HKS Architects Dallas/Los Angeles/Orlando/Richmondrrampa/Atlanta/Salt Lake (qty Review is only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with information given and the design concept expressed In the Contract Documents. Review is not conducted for the purpose of determining the accuracy or completeness of other details such as dimensions or quantities or for substantiating instructions for installation or performance of equipment or systems designed by the Contractor, all of which remain the responsibility of the Contractor. Review or acceptance of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is a component. Review neither extends nor alters any contractual obligations of the Architect or Contractor and review shall not relieve the Contractor of responsibility for any deviation from the requirements of the Contract Documents ❑ Accepted as Noted ❑ Not Reviewed; Submittal not ❑ Revise, Resubmit required by contract documents ❑ Product Substitution, Submit in Reviewed for Architectural Issues accordance with Section 01630 Only ❑ Value Engineering, Submit in ❑ Reviewed for Project Close-Out accordance with Section 01630 Requirements Only By: Vl \^44 V lam, Date: ►Z/ Z610-7 FRICTION LOSS CALCULATIONS TYPICAL These calculations are prepared to be in conformance with the project plans and specifications and are submitted to show certain details of the SUNCOAST post-tensioning system. The drawings are intended to relate information contained in the plans regarding force and intended profile of the pre-stressing system. No warranty expressed or implied, as to the adequacy of the design is to be made by virtue of this submittal. 4 f 's L •v7 SUBMITTED (DATE) ISUBMITTAL NUM THIS REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL CONTRACT COMPL iANCE AND DOE RELEASE THE SUBCONTRACTOR AND/OR SUPI,LIER FRUM COMPL TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND SUBCONTF AND/OR PURCHASE ORDER AGREEMENTS: NOR DOES PHIS HELI THE ARCHITECTS OR CONSULTANTS FROM THEIR CONTRACT RESPONSIBILITY. CONTRACTORS SIGNATURE _ LAYTON CONST CTION COMPANY INC. Suncoast Post-Tension, LTD. 7300 S. Alton Way Centennial, CO 80112 Ph. (303)770-5301 Fax (303)770-5312 - - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:37:07 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 22' Band L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 173.63 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. °s Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .795 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 1.971 ksi Relaxation 2.093 ksi Total long-term stress losses 10.800 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) Coefficient of wobble friction (K) Ultimate strength of strand Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength Anchor set Cross-sectional area of strand Total Number of Strands per Tendon STRESSING .06000 /radian .00080 rad/ft 270.00 ksi .80 .38 inch .153 inch'2 1 AT RIGHT END Page I of 72 r LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 22) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9--------10------11------12- 1 20.41 1 4.25 2.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 172.13 169.66 167.09 20.41 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 169.65 ksi Long term stress losses 10.80 ksi Final average stress 158.85 ksi Final average force in tendon 24.30 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (172.13ksi; .638) 20.41 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .638; Max along tendon .638 .00 inch 1.45 inch 1.45 inch 071182 inch/ft .38 inch 1.83 inch 33.05 kips Page 2 of 72 rl ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:37 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 22' Band 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 22 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses - _ Long-Term Losses _ 172.5 - 170.0 - _ - - 167 5 - - - - - - - . R-~ 165 0 - - - - . - 160.0 - 157.5 - Span 1 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 4 25 - 1 25 -4- . 4.00 = : `Dead - - - - ~ --S ng End-- 3.75 - - - 3.50 \ - - - - - - - 3.00 2.75 - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 2.25 - - - - 2 - Span 1 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 169.65 ksi Long term stress losses 10.80 ksi Final average stress 158.85 ksi Final average force in tendon 24.30 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (172.13ksi; .638) 20.41 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 1.45 inch Total elongation after anchor set 1.45 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .071182 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .38 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 1.83 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 3 of 72 ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:37:45 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 30' Band L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 135.39 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. u Volume to surface ratio of member 6.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .620 ksi Shrinkage 5.103 ksi Creep 1.537 ksi Relaxation 2.873 ksi Total long-term stress losses 10.133 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .38 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 4 of 72 i I, LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 30) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start cente r right -1----2----- 3----4------5------6-------7----8----9------- - 10------ 11-- 12- CAN 3.25 1 6.00 10.50 .08 189.37 182.66 1 24.83 1 10.50 1.00 6.00 .08 .50 .08 182.66 178.1 3 174.51 28.08 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 179.34 ksi Long term stress losses 10.13 ksi Final average stress 169.21 ksi Final average force in tendon 25.89 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( OOksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (189.37ksi; .701) 28.08 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 2.11 inch Total elongation after anchor set 2.11 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .075247 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .38 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 2.49 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .701; Max along tendon .701 Page 5 of 72 I ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION , INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:38 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 30' Band 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 30 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Ten Losses _ 190 - - - _ 185 - - - - - 180 - 175 - . 170 165 - - _II.IlIJ1LLJ.ILIIlI.LI.I - - - - Left Cantilever Span 1 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in) 10 6___'_ _ - = - - - - 9 - - - - 8 - _ - - - - - 7 Dea d_- ---Stressing_End- 6 5 - - - - , - 4 - i - - - - - - r~ - - . 1 0 Left Cantilever Span 1 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 179.34 ksi Long term stress losses 10.13 ksi Final average stress 169.21 ksi Final average force in tendon 25.89 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( Ooksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (189.37ksi; .701) 28.08 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 2.11 inch Total elongation after anchor set 2.11 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .075247 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .38 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 2.49 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 6 of 72 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:39:26 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 53' Band L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 156.68 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. % Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .718 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 1.779 ksi Relaxation 3.497 ksi Total long-term stress losses 11.934 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand 153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 7 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 53) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2---- -3 ----4--- ---5----- -6------- 7---- 8----9---- 10----- - 11------ 12- CAN 6.00 1 4.25 7.00 .08 176.87 179.94 1 27.00 4 (angle changes = 68.0) 179.94 189.70 193.77 2 34.00 4 (angle changes = 50.0) 193.77 185.53 178.10 67.00 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 186.38 ksi Long term stress losses 11.93 ksi Final average stress 174.45 ksi Final average force in tendon 26.69 k Anchor set influence from left pull (196.44ksi; .728) 29.03 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 5.24 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.24 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .078201 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 5.49 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .660; Max along tendon .728 Page 8 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POS T-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:39 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 53' Band 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 53 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksil Friction Losses Long_Term Losses - - 195 190 - - 185 - 180 175 - 170 - - ~ 165 - ` .JIl1lILLllllllJllll-_L.-1 --.I_1_I L-.L_.1 _ 1 Left Cantilever Span 1 - - Span 2 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 6 ead 5 _Sir in4 d - - - ~ r / 4 3 - - O Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 186.38 ksi Long term stress losses 11.93 ksi Final average stress 174.45 ksi Final average force in tendon 26.69 k Anchor set influence from left pull (196.44ksi; .728) 29.03 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .OOksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 5.24 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.24 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .078201 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 5.49 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES n.._.. n ..r-r~ - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:40:09 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 134' Band S#1 L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 150.57 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .690 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 1.709 ksi Relaxation 3.500 ksi Total long-term stress losses 11.839 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu)................ .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch A2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 10 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 134 S41) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right Xl/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9-------- 10------ 11------ 12- 1 22.29 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 182.03 184.52 188.43 2 28.00 4 (angle changes = 16.0) 188.43 192.76 195.65 3 15.95 1 7.00 2.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 195.65 192.44 188.54 4 15.00 1 7.00 2.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 188.54 185.17 181.49 CAN 3.25 1 7.00 4.25 .08 181.49 177.19 84.49 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 188.61 ksi Long term stress losses 11.84 ksi Final average stress 176.77 ksi 7inal average force in tendon 27.05 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (196.60ksi; .728) 35.29 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 6.69 inch Total elongation after anchor set 6.69 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .079136 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 6.94 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .674; Max along tendon .728 Page I I of 72 P ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:40 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 134' Band S#1 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 134 S#1 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long Term Losses - 195 - - - - 190 185 180 - - - - - 175 170 - - - 165 Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Right Cantilever 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] - - 7 - -43 5 - 6 5 - Dead End-- - - - - / ( 4 - - - I---- - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - --'4 - - - - f - - J 0 -11-L ~.1-1. 1._I..L_!-1_LLI_ 1_1_.L_ L_L I-_L-L_L-1_ WJ~_LJ-1 i 1_-L _L- 1 111_1_111L 1~_L-L.l 1.1 J_IJJ11J_L11-L LI LtJ_L Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 188.61 ksi Long term stress losses 11.84 ksi Final average stress 176.77 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.05 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (196.60ksi; .728) 35.29 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 6.69 inch Total elongation after anchor set 6.69 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .079136 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 6.94 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES - Page 12 of 72 Y 1 - - , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:40:48 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 134' Band S#2 L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 180.39 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .826 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.048 ksi Relaxation 4.415 ksi Total long-term stress losses 13.230 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L 0 N G P. T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) Coefficient of wobble friction (K) Ultimate strength of strand Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength Anchor set Cross-sectional area of strand Total Number of Strands per Tendon STRESSING .06000 /radian .00080 rad/ft 270.00 ksi .80 .25 inch .153 inch"2 1 AT RIGHT END Page 13 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 134 S#2) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2----- 3 ----4------5------6----- 7----8----9-------- 10------ 11--- 12- 1 16.75 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 201.92 202.57 198.38 2 30.67 1 7.00 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 198.38 194.54 191.12 47.42 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 197.20 ksi Long term stress losses 13.23 ksi Final average stress 183.97 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.15 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (203.56ksi; .754) 42.47 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .748; Max along tendon .754 .00 inch 3.92 inch 3.92 inch .082743 inch/ft .25 inch 4.17 inch 33.05 kips Page 14 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www .adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION , INC. Date: 1214/2007 Time: 10:41 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 134' Band S#2 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 134 S#2 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long_Term Losses 200 195 - _ _ - - - - _ _ 190 ` - - 185 - - - - - 180 - - - Span 1 Span 2 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 7 435 - - _ 6 - - - - - - - 5 - Dead-End---- _ _-Stressing-End- Y 4 - _ - 3 I-- - - - - - - O Span 1 Span 2 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 197.20 ksi Long term stress losses 13.23 ksi Final average stress 183.97 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.15 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( Ooksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (203.56ksi; .754) 42.47 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 3.92 inch Total elongation after anchor set 3.92 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082743 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 4.17 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 15 of 72 - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:41:30 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 135' Band S#1 L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system Type of strand Ultimate strength of strand Modulus of elasticity of strand Estimate of initial average compression UNBONDED LOW LAX 270.00 ksi 28600.00 ksi 123.58 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 26 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .566 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 1.403 ksi Relaxation 3.279 ksi Total long-term stress losses 11.188 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 16 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 135 S#1) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1--- -2----- 3 ----4--- ---5--- ---6----- --7----8---- 9------ 10---- 11------ 12- 1 22.29 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 174.30 176.69 180.46 2 29.17 4 (angle changes = 60.0) 180.46 188.63 195.63 3 15.83 1 7.00 2.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 195.63 192.41 188.50 4 15.00 1 7.00 2.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 188.50 185.13 181.45 CAN 3.25 1 7.00 4.25 .08 181.45 177.15 85.54 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 185.23 ksi Long term stress losses 11.19 ksi Final average stress 174.05 ksi Final average force in tendon 26.63 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (196.58ksi; .728) 35.10 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 6.65 inch Total elongation after anchor set 6.65 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .077721 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 6.90 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .672; Max along tendon .728 Page 17 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:41 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 135' Band S#1 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 135 S#1 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] - _ _ - _ Friction Losses Long-Term Losses 190- 5 18 80 = - - 1 - - - - 175 - - - - - - - . 7 - - 1 0 - - - 165 - 1J-I__IyIJ_. 1_LL_l _L _L.LI__LLLJJ - - -LI I-LLW-LIJ-L-L-L - _LLLLI_L_1_l_I_LLLI_lJ_.LI_ LLLl1LIJ11 1_W_ Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Right Cantilever 3 -TE NDON PROFILE [in] - 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 Dead End- - - - - - - - ---Sire s ng n 4 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 _ - - - y - 1 - - 2 - - - O_ J-LL_LI_LIJJJ-L_l._I._.1-I....LI~J-_ 1-1 I I L-LJ~Ly t -L_1-I-J__ L_ 1 1 I, IJ_IJ_LL_LLLJ_LJ-I J_J-L1-I.1-1_LI 1A I-IJ _L Ll_L Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 185.23 ksi Long term stress losses 11.19 ksi Final average stress 174.05 ksi Final average force in tendon 26.63 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .OOksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (196.58ksi; .728) 35.10 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 6.65 inch Total elongation after anchor set 6.65 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .077721 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 6.90 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 18 of 72 ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:42:17 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F°I C T I T L E 193' Band S#2 L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 330.10 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.512 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 3.748 ksi Relaxation 4.324 ksi Total long-term stress losses 15.525 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 19 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 193 S#2) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- CAN 5.50 1 4.25 7.00 .08 190.06 193.13 1 26.50 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 193.13 196.56 200.45 2 32.50 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 200.45 204.24 200.05 3 33.17 1 7.00 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 200.05 196.10 192.52 97.67 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 198.10 ksi Long term stress losses 15.52 ksi Final average stress 182.57 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.93 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (204.26ksi; .757) 49.33 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 8.12 inch Total elongation after anchor set 8.12 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .083117 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 8.37 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .713; Max along tendon .757 Page 20 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:42 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 193' Band S#2 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 193 S#2 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses 205 - _ _ - - Long-Term Losses - - - - 200 - - - - ' _ 195 / 190 'l - - - 185 - - - 80 175 - - - - - - - -11111111111111111111_1_L.J_J-1-1_1.1J._I._1-Ll__t-L1__I_.J_L-.-L..1._..L.1__.L._L__L_LJ.__I_L_1._J-J.J._J_J__J-. - Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 7 4 - oc _ : I - - 6 - : - AV_ - - - 5 - -D ad ~nd - - - - - Stressing €n \ 4 - - - y - - 2 I O Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 198.10 ksi Long term stress losses 15.52 ksi Final average stress 182.57 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.93 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .OOksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (204.26ksi; .757) 49.33 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 8.12 inch Total elongation after anchor set 8.12 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set . 083117 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 8.37 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 21 of 72 'I ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:42:57 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 194' Band S#1 L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 201.96 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. °s Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .925 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.293 ksi Relaxation 2.270 ksi Total long-term stress losses 11.429 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu)....... I........ .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .38 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 22 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/1, etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 194 S41) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9------- -10------11--- ---12- 1 14.17 1 4.25 2.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 183.79 181.75 177.56 2 17.58 4 (angle changes = 68.0) 177.56 168.73 159.40 CAN 3.25 1 7.00 4.25 .08 159.40 155.10 - 35.00 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 172.78 ksi Long term stress losses 11.43 ksi Final average stress 161.35 ksi Final average force in tendon 24.69 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( OOksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (183.79ksi; .681) 35.00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 2.54 inch Total elongation after anchor set 2.54 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .072496 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .38 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 2.91 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .681; Max along tendon .681 Page 23 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:43 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 194' Band S#1 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 194 S#1 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses 185 - - - . - - - - - - - - - - 180 - 175 - - _ ' - _ 170 _ - - - _ - 1 5 6 160 - - - - 155 _ - - - - - - 50 - 1 - 145 : - - - - - - ~ Span 1 Span 2 Right Cantilever 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 7 26 -4 ~ .0 - : - - - - 6.5 - - - - - 6.0 5.5 - 5.0 4.5 : Dead End- _ . - - - . - - - - - S ressmg nd I 40 3.5 - - - - - - - - 3.0 2.5 _ g ' - - - L - - - - - - 2.0 - - - - - Span 1 Span 2 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 172.78 ksi Long term stress losses 11.43 ksi Final average stress 161.35 ksi Final average force in tendon 24.69 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (183.79ksi; .681) 35.00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 2.54 inch Total elongation after anchor set 2.54 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .072496 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .38 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 2.91 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 24 of 72 - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:43:36 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 194' Band S#2 L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 191.14 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. % Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .875 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.170 ksi Relaxation 4.177 ksi Total long-term stress losses 13.162 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set 25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 25 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 194 S#2) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8--- -9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- CAN 5.00 1 4.25 7.00 .08 194.08 197.30 1 30.95 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 197.30 200.96 197.39 2 27.33 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 197.39 193.72 189.80 CAN 5.00 1 7.00 4.25 .08 189.80 186.50 68.28 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 195.99 ksi Long term stress losses 13.16 ksi Final average stress 182.83 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.97 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (201.25ksi; .745) 46.50 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 5.61 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.61 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082233 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 5.86 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .719; Max along tendon .745 Page 26 of 72 ' ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:43 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 194' Band S#2 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 194 S#2 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses - long-Term Losses _ 200 195 - L= - - _ - 190 - 185 180 - - 175 - - - - - - IIIl11LILLIlWillll L l 1 1 1 111 l L J L L L 1 L I 1 1 11 L ll ll lll L L L L L - _ - - _ _ - _ - - L_ W _ - -1- .__L_~L 1 I l_ Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Right Cantilever 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 7 4-25 - - 6 5 = - D dEn - - - - - - tre - - - - / 4 f - - - - - - - y 3 2 - - - ~ - - O _I11111111111WW1 -_L__L-.1__L_1-._L_1-L-L___l-_t__I_.-~-_L_ L _I___ IIWti1t11li1IIW1- Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Ri ght Cantileve r 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 195.99 ksi Long term stress losses 13.16 ksi Final average stress 182.83 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.97 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (201.25ksi; .745) 46.50 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 5.61 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.61 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082233 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 5.86 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Pa e 27 of 72 ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:44:13 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 194' Band S#3 L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 156.95 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. Volume to surface ratio of member 5.32 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .719 ksi Shrinkage 5.428 ksi Creep 1.782 ksi Relaxation 3.980 ksi Total long-term stress losses 11.910 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch-2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 28 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 194 S43) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- 1 25.75 1 4.25 1.00 10.50 .08 .50 .08 199.49 198.40 193.08 2 20.04 1 10.50 1.00 6.00 .08 .50 .08 193.08 188.37 184.80 45.79 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 193.86 ksi Long term stress losses 11.91 ksi Final average stress 181.95 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.84 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi ; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (200.40ksi ; .742) 42.25 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 3.72 inch Total elongation after anchor set 3.72 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .081341 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 3.97 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .739; Max along tendon .742 Page 29 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION , INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:44 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 194' Band S#3 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 194 S#3 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses 200 190 - - - - 185 - - - - - - - 180 _ - ~ _ 175 _ - - - - - - - - Span 1 Span 2 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] - - - 11 - - _ 4.25 10! 1_0.5 6 9 - - - - - - - 8 7 -Stressing 6 - - - - - Dead End 4 r - - 3 - - - 2 _ - - - - - - ~ 0 -L_1--L_-L- Span 1 Span 2 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 193.86 ksi Long term stress losses 11.91 ksi Final average stress 181.95 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.84 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (200.40ksi; .742) 42.25 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 3.72 inch Total elongation after anchor set 3.72 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .081341 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 3.97 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 30 of 72 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:44:51 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 234' Band S#1 L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 201.96 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. % Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .925 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.293 ksi Relaxation 2.827 ksi Total long-term stress losses 11.985 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 31 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general Xi/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 234 S#1) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9-------- 10------ 11------ 12- 1 21.75 1 4.25 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 175.48 177.87 181.30 2 18.91 1 7.00 4.25 7.00 .08 .50 .08 181.30 183.51 186.23 3 14.17 1 7.00 2.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 186.23 189.35 186.85 4 17.58 4 (angle changes = 68.0) 186.85 178.01 168.68 CAN 3.25 1 7.00 4.25 .08 168.68 164.39 75.66 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 180.88 ksi Long term stress losses 11.98 ksi Final average stress 168.89 ksi Final average force in tendon 25.84 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (190.19ksi; .704) 25.69 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 5.74 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.74 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .075892 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 5.99 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .650; Max along tendon .704 Page 32 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time. 10:45 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 234' Band S#1 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 234 S#1 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Lon -Term Losses 0 - - - - 19 r - - - 5 = 18 - - - - ' - 180 _ - 75 _ - - - . 1 - - - 170 - - - 165 160 - - - - 155 - LyLL_I-.L-IJ-I _~LL-Li_l_-t-L-L-LI-LJJ-L_IJ J_f._L LIJ_L11L_1_ Ll.W_L 1LLL_LIJ_JJ-. . . . . . . . . YSY Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Right Cantilever 3 -TE NDON PROFILE [in) 7 . 4.25--- - i 6 5 Dead-End- - - - - - - - - - - - ~ 1 \ - - - - - - Str ng 4 - 2 - - - - - - - - O . _LL J-IyJ-1_L_L-LJ ._I_ t_J-J-L_ 1_ Span 1 LI-I.-I-.l__l_LI_IJJ_1 L11L1-1_ I_ Span 2 .I..I 1_I_1_JJJ_LJ_.1_ Span 3 LLL J_I_I-L.1_. LJyI__J_IJ-I_LI_l_.1_ Span 4 I_L-1-1__L_YYNNAEY. Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 180.88 ksi Long term stress losses 11.98 ksi Final average stress 168.89 ksi Final average force in tendon 25.84 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (190.19ksi; .704) 25.69 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 5.74 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.74 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .075892 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 5.99 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 33 of 72 ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:45:29 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 244' Band S#1 L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 145.55 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. °s Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .667 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 1.652 ksi Relaxation 3.502 ksi Total long-term stress losses 11.762 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) Coefficient of wobble friction (K) Ultimate strength of strand Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength Anchor set Cross-sectional area of strand Total Number of Strands per Tendon STRESSING .06000 /radian .00080 rad/ft 270.00 ksi .80 .25 inch .153 inch"2 1 AT RIGHT END Page 34 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 244 S41) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1--- -2----- 3- ---4------5----- -6----- --7----8----9--------10---- --11------12- 1 22.00 1 4.25 4.25 7.00 .08 .50 .08 174.18 175.75 178.71 2 23.50 4 (angle changes = 50.0) 178.71 185.57 192.90 3 7.91 1 7.00 6.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 192.90 194.27 196.72 4 17.00 4 (angle changes = 38.0) 196.72 202.84 196.13 5 27.00 1 7.00 2.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 196.13 192.65 189.71 97.41 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 188.54 ksi Long term stress losses 11.76 ksi Final average stress 176.78 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.05 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( Ooksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (202.86ksi; .751) 35.52 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 7.71 inch Total elongation after anchor set 7.71 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .079109 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 7.96 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .703; Max along tendon .751 Page 35 of 72 ' ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION , INC. Date: 1214/2007 Time: 10:45 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 244' Band S#1 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 244 S#1 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi) Fddion Losses Lon -Term Losses 200 - 195 190 185 - - - 180 175 =s- 170 - - - - - 165 - - -1_J L LI J I LI L L l1 LI LLW 111 I I IJ~LJ l~ 1 I L L L 1 I 1 l L l1lllLLL111Il J WJ LJ L - I L ly L J 1 L1J 1 - 1 LL LL 1J I _ . _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ . _ . _ _ Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 ;pan - _ . _ - - - - Span 5 - _ _ _ . 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in) 7 -4-25- - - - - - - - - 4-.25- 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 - ---Dead End------- - i 4 _1. _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - iressing€nd-- I - - - 3 - r - - - - - - - - - 0 =1-LLL.LI_LLJ-LI_l 1 1 1 1 LJ J-I 11L._I-W 1 1 J.J-L.L.1-. 1. 1_L.. IIILLILL1111111111.1-1-1-111.L 1-1 _L 1-11-1-1_L l.l. l___ - 1-1-..1._I_I. 1.. Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Span 5 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 188.54 ksi Long term stress losses 11.76 ksi Final average stress 176.78 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.05 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (202.86ksi; .751) 35.52 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 7.71 inch Total elongation after anchor set 7.71 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .079109 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 7.96 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 36 of 72 ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:46:08 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 245' Band S#2 L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 104.17 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .477 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 1.183 ksi Relaxation 3.522 ksi Total long-term stress losses 11.122 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number'of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 37 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 245 S42) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2---- -3----4------5----- -6----- 7----8----9---- 10---- 11------ 12- CAN 5.50 1 4.25 7.00 .08 162.06 164.71 1 12.17 4 (angle changes = 28.0) 164.71 168.32 172.13 2 34.68 4 (angle changes = 52.0) 172.13 179.53 187.68 3 32.75 4 (angle changes = 36.0) 187.68 194.06 200.95 4 26.67 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 200.95 202.72 198.91 5 17.40 1 7.00 7.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 198.91 197.45 195.68 6 14.63 1 7.00 3.50 4.25 .08 .50 .08 195.68 192.90 191.26 143.80 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 188.92 ksi Long term stress losses 11.12 ksi Final average stress 177.80 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.20 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (203.63ksi; .754) 49.06 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .708; Max along tendon .754 .00 inch 11.40 inch 11.40 inch 079269 inch/ft .25 inch 11.65 inch 33.05 kips Page 38 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM I E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SLINCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:46 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 245' Band S#2 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 245 S#2 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term LLsses_ 200 _ 190.. - - - - - - 180 170 - - - 160 150 --JIpWm ❑nIIllrlIrrlT ..rJ _r=v_I=f=r=~-r. T_FT _T:Z~J _T_1_ =-r- rrs_LL-~-rr. cr_T1r_QTrrl_r_l rrrtTCt4LrrmTn rmrmlmlm):m= Left Cantilev0pan 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Span 5 Span 6 3 - TENDON PROFILE [in] 7 4-25~ - - - - --4.25- 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - I e 5 - $d €n - II- - - - - - - - tr ssing€nd 4 - - t - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - C- II J I 1L.1.1-. Q lww111 11 VLl/IllllllllllJl_I__I_IJ-IJ_..1__L _t-LLIJ-LIJ-LLLI_LJ 1_LL!_I_I_I._L I_LLLl _LLLLLLLILLLI_IJJ-1_LL .IIL1.41LL1I JJ11.LLL 11111-1-1i1 LLLI Left Cantilev8pan 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Span 5 Span 6 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 188.92 ksi Long term stress losses 11.12 ksi Final average stress 177.80 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.20 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .0oksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (203.63ksi; .754) 49.06 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 11.40 inch Total elongation after anchor set 11.40 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .079269 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 11.65 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 39 of 72 ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:46:51 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 250' Band S#2 L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand . . . LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 107.90 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete . . . NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .494 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 1.225 ksi Relaxation 3.286 ksi Total long-term stress losses 10.945 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch-2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 40 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 250 S#2) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/1, start center right -1-- --2----- 3 ----4--- ---5----- -6-------7----8----9------ 10---- 11---- 12- CAN 5.50 1 4.25 7.00 .08 154.24 156.77 1 12.17 4 (angle changes = 28.0) 156.77 160.20 163.83 2 34.41 4 (angle changes = 50.0) 163.83 170.69 178.23 3 33.91 4 (angle changes = 52.0) 178.23 185.85 194.33 4 28.58 4 (angle changes = 48.0) 194.33 201.87 199.30 5 32.33 1 7.00 4.25 4.25 .08 .50 .08 199.30 196.02 193.25 146.90 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 184.08 ksi Long term stress losses 10.95 ksi Final average stress 173.13 ksi Final average force in tendon 26.49 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( OOksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (204.62ksi; .758) 41.32 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 11.35 inch Total elongation after anchor set 11.35 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .077235 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 11.60 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .716; Max along tendon .758 Page 41 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:47 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 250' Band S#2 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 250 S#2 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses __Long_Term Losses 200 - - - - 180 - 170 - - _ - 160 - - - - 150 - - - - ~.iWNiW lI111 I I1W III ~t 1 -1 -L 1-J-1_1-1__LLL-L.LJ-LJ_LL-I_ J_.1_1-LL-L1l_LJ Left CantilewSpan 1 Span 2 Span 3 J_I_LLI_ 1_ L_L_I_ Span 4 "_L 1_LLl_L_L_I J _L~.L11_11111_L_l Span 5 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 7 - 4,2 6 - I - - - - - - - 5 - e~d En - - - - - - - - - - - -Stressing-End-_ - - - - - 3 - - - 2 - 0 _Y10Y W111I1L1111111111 1-1-.1-J__L_I_I_l_LL1_L1_J _l__LL LLL_I-l1LI.J. 1-11J_1J_.LLLL lJ_LL11J Left Cantilevepan 1 Span 2 Span 3 Jl._I__II~1_~1J_L. 1__L_LI_LL_L_.I..L-111~_LJ-Ll. tl.. Span 4 Span 5 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 184.08 ksi Long term stress losses 10.95 ksi Final average stress 173.13 ksi Final average force in tendon 26.49 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (204.62ksi; .758) 41.32 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 11.35 inch Total elongation after anchor set 11.35 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .077235 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 11.60 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES I Page 42 of 72 ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2,400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:47:31 P R O J E C T T I T L E 110175-FOUR SEASONS VAIL S P E C I F I C T I T L E 251' Band S#1 L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 145.55 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .667 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 1.652 ksi Relaxation 3.736 ksi Total long-term stress losses 11.995 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch-2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 43 of 72 i LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (Band 251 S41) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2----- 3 ----4--- 5----- -6----- --7----8----9------ 10---- --11------ 12- CAN 6.00 1 4.25 7.00 .08 176.17 178.93 1 25.95 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 178.93 182.10 185.86 2 17.75 1 7.00 1.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 185.86 189.16 192.90 3 7.91 1 7.00 6.00 7.00 .08 .50 .08 192.90 194.27 196.72 4 17.00 4 (angle changes = 38.0) 196.72 202.84 196.13 5 27.00 1 7.00 2.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 196.13 192.65 189.71 101.61 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 189.79 ksi Long term stress losses 12.00 ksi Final average stress 177.79 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.20 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (202.86ksi; .751) 35.52 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 8.09 inch Total elongation after anchor set 8.09 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .079632 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 8.34 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .703; Max along tendon .751 Page 44 of 72 ' ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:47 1- PROJECT TITLE : 110175-FOUR SEASONS VAIL 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 251' Band S#1 1.2 FILE NAME : Band 251 S#1 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] _Friction Losses Long-Term Losses 200 - - - 195 - - = _ - - - 190 - - - - - - - - 185 _ 180 - - ~ 175 = - - 170 - - - - 165 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_~_LJ L_.LJ_l_1_.J._J. A. J__ I....1. L_I-I~_I_ J1LI11111.1LJ_LLJLL!_ Ill LLllll11111111 IJ_LLJ-L1J.ll1lJ_LLLl t t t-._I.-L_LLI t I t t I_yJJ-1 Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Span 5 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 7 -4:2 6 - / ad nd - - - - - 5 ----.D ' Stressing-End--- 4 - - - - - - - - r - - - - y 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O_JlWtlltlillltlllll-l-Ll_LJ-I-IJ__I LLLLL.LL.LLLt1JJ_LLLLILLILLJlLLl1_LI_L.l_LIJ1.1_IJJ_L11J1J_I.-IJ__L..1_.J_L_L.._t-J-_LI_J _I_1-1_1__L_I-.1-.1- Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Span 5 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 189.79 ksi Long term stress losses 12.00 ksi Final average stress 177.79 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.20 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( Ooksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (202.86ksi; .751) 35.52 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 8.09 inch Total elongation after anchor set 8.09 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .079632 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 8.34 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 45 of 72 - i ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the nal stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:48:14 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 24'UNI L 0 N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 166.27 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. % Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .762 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 1.888 ksi Relaxation 2.282 s1 Total long-term stress losses 10.871 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .38 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 46 of 72 r LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (24-UNI) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9--------10------11------12- 1 21.83 1 4.25 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 169.13 172.12 174.94 21.83 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 172.10 ksi Long term stress losses 10.87 ksi Final average stress 161.22 ksi Final average force in tendon 24.67 k Anchor set influence from left pull (174.94ksi; .648) 21.83 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 1.58 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 1.58 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .072208 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 1.95 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .38 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .648; Max along tendon .648 Page 47 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:48 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 24'UNI 1.2 FILE NAME : 24'UNI 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses 75 - 1 .0 - 172.5 170.0 - 167.5 - - - - - 165.0 - - - 162.5 160.0 157.5 '--1 --'--'--~1 1- Span 1 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 25 4,2,% ~ _ - - - - - - - 4.0 Stressi End - ~ ad End 3.0 - - - - - 2.5 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.5 1.0 - - - _ J - ; Span 1 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 172.10 ksi Long term stress losses 10.87 ksi Final average stress 161.22 ksi Final average force in tendon 24.67 k Anchor set influence from left pull (174.94ksi; .648) 21.83 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( OOksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 1.58 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 1.58 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .072208 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 1.95 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 38 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 48 of 72 : ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:48:52 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOURSEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 39' UNI L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 197.45 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES Elastic shortening .904 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.242 ksi Relaxation 3.941 ksi Total long-term stress losses 13.028 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT LEFT END Page 49 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (39'UNI) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/1, X2/L X3/L start center right -1---- 2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8--- -9------- -10------ 11--- 12- 1 16.91 1 4.25 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 185.24 188.12 192.02 2 20.54 1 7.50 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 192.02 196.47 199.18 37.45 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 192.66 ksi Long term stress losses 13.03 ksi Final average stress 179.64 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.48 k Anchor set influence from left pull (199.18ksi; .738) 37.45 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 3.03 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 3.03 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .080838 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 3.28 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .25 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .738; Max along tendon .738 Page 50 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 1214/2007 Time: 10:49 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOURSEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 39' UNI 1.2 FILE NAME : 39'UNI 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses 200 - - - 195 - - - 190 - - - - - _ - 185 ^ - - - - - - 180 - - - 175 - - - L.-_I_.__1.--1.__.l_-1-..1....-1-J--1.yJJ__ Span 1 ~ Span 2 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 4.25 7,5 5 4.25 6 - - - - - 5 -Stressing-End - - --Dead~nd - 2 - - - ~ _-i_-1_-L__l__1._L-L.-LJ--I--L-_L-1__-1.__-1_-l_yLJ-1_--.. 0 Span 1 Span 2 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 192.66 ksi Long term stress losses 13.03 ksi Final average stress 179.64 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.48 k Anchor set influence from left pull (199.18ksi; .738) 37.45 ft Anchor set influence from right pull ( .OOksi; .000) .00 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 3.03 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .00 inch Total elongation after anchor set 3.03 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .080838 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 3.28 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force .25 33.05 inch kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 51 of 72 ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:49:32 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 57'UNI L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 166.27 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .762 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 1.888 ksi Relaxation 4.424 ksi Total long-term stress losses 13.013 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch-2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 52 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (57'UNI) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1---- 2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8----9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- 1 26.00 1 4.25 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 201.64 202.62 198.39 2 29.00 1 7.50 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 198.39 194.51 191.19 55.00 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 198.04 ksi Long term stress losses 13.01 ksi Final average stress 185.02 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.31 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (203.59ksi ; .754) 46.51 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 4.57 inch Total elongation after anchor set 4.57 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .083093 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 4.82 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .747; Max along tendon .754 Page 53 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:49 1- PROJECT TITLE: FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 57'UNI 1.2 FILE NAME : 57'UNI 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses - 200 - - - - 195 - - - - - 190 - - - 185 - _ 180 - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 I L L 1 I L - Span 1 Span 2 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 4.25 7 57.5 4.25 6 = - 5 - //QeadEnd- - - ---Stressing End\ - = y r~ r 4 _ 3~-- - - 0..-1_--1-__1-.--1. Span 1 Span 2 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 198.04 ksi Long term stress losses 13.01 ksi Final average stress 185.02 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.31 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( ooksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (203.59ksi; .754) 46.51 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 4.57 inch Total elongation after anchor set 4.57 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .083093 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 4.82 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 54 of 72 ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:50:11 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 61'UNI L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 311.76 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening 1.428 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 3.540 ksi Relaxation 3.879 - - ksi - Total long-term stress losses - 14.787 - ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 55 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (611UNI) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3 ----4------5------6-------7---- 8--- -9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- 1 25.20 1 4.25 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 193.55 196.33 196.88 2 20.92 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 196.88 193.23 188.66 3 12.83 1 7.50 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 188.66 184.34 181.35 58.95 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 192.65 ksi Long term stress losses 14.79 ksi Final average stress 177.86 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.21 k Anchor set in fluence from left pull ( OOksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set in fluence from right pull (198.68ksi; .736) 36.98 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 4.77 inch Total elongat ion after anchor set 4.77 inch Ratio of tota l elongation to tendon length after anchor set .080833 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 5.02 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .717; Max along tendon .736 Page 56 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:50 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 61'UNI 1.2 FILE NAME : 61'UNI 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses 200 _ - 195 - - , - - 190 - - - - 185 - - 180 - - - - - - - 175 - - 170 - - - 165 I I J 11 1 I I L I-1_,-i_LLL 1 1 11 LJ_ Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 4.25 - 7 -5 7. E 5 4.25 ~ 7 - - - - - - - 5 - __Dead-End----- - - ---Stressin9-~-- 4 r - - - - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - - - O Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) Long term stress losses Final average stress 192.65 14.79 177.86 ksi ksi ksi Final average force in tendon 27.21 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( ooksi; ooo) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (198.68ksi; .736) 36.98 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 4.77 inch Total elongation after anchor set 4.77 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .080833 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 5.02 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 57 of 72 - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the :nal stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:50:50 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 71'UNI L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 166.27 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. °s volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .762 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 1.888 ksi Relaxation 4.191 ksi Total long-term stress losses 12.780 ksi F R I C T'I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 58 of 72 LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (71-UNI) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1---- 2-----3----4------5------6-------7----8--- -9------- -10------ 11--- 12- CAN 5.41 1 4.25 7.50 .08 193.91 197.40 1 31.25 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 197.40 201.18 197.91 2 25.95 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 197.91 194.14 190.11 CAN 6.00 1 6.50 4.25 .08 190.11 187.41 68.61 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 196.31 ksi Long term stress losses 12.78 ksi Final average stress 183.53 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.08 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (201.70ksi; .747) 45.27 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 5.65 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.65 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082370 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 5.90 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .718; Max along tendon .747 Page 59 of 72 L ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:51 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 71'UNI 1.2 FILE NAME : 71'UNI 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses - - _ - 200 - _ _ 195 - - 190 - - - - 185 - - - - = _ 180 - - - 175 - - Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Right Cantilever 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] -4.25 7 -5 7 _5 6 .5 4.25 7 - 6 - - - - - 5 - =De d-End - - - - St ed- 4 - - - - - - - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - O _ _I 11lILLWl11LL 1LLL_L_L_.-L-J -I_-1--L_1-L__J.-L-L_--L_-L~_-L-_L _L-J--I-_I 1- _L_L LI L-L._J_~ 1-L_ L- WLllW11JLL Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 196.31 ksi Long term stress losses 12.78 ksi Final average stress 183.53 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.08 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .OOksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (201.70ksi; .747) 45.27 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 5.65 inch Total elongation after anchor set 5.65 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082370 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 5.90 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Pa e 60 of 72 - - / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:51:28 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 95'UNI L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 166.27 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. °s volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .762 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 1.888 ksi Relaxation 3.725 ksi Total long-term stress losses 12.315 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch-2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 61 of 72 • V ' LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (95'UNI) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3 ----4------5----- -6---- ---7----8----9------- -10--- 11------ 12- CAN 6.00 1 4.25 6.50 .08 179.68 182.18 1 24.95 1 6.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 182.18 185.28 189.31 2 15.58 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 189.31 192.97 197.50 3 15.58 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 197.50 201.32 197.00 4 24.95 1 7.50 1.00 6.50 .08 .50 .08 197.00 193.26 189.53 CAN 6.00 1 6.50 4.25 .05 189.53 186.85 93.06 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 191.02 ksi Long term stress losses 12.31 ksi Final average stress 178.71 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.34 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (201.42ksi; .746) 38.49 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 7.46 inch Total elongation after anchor set 7.46 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .080149 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 7.71 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .702; Max along tendon .746 Page 62 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION , INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:51 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 95'UNI 1.2 FILE NAME : 95'UNI 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] -Friction Losses Long-Term Losses 200 _ T- - - _ - - 195 - _ 190 5 - 18 - - 180 175 - - - - - - - 170 ~ I JIIIIIIIIIIW111111.1__L_I _J._I-LLl-1-1__I__L _L _L L-Ll_J._I LJ_11LI11J.JLI_I I.J.J._I 11LLLI.1 LI_l 1.1 I I.I Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 ILLLLI__LJ-L J_LLl.1J_.L1_LI-L_L Span 4 1-L 111I11W1111111W1_ Right Cantilever 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 4.25 6.!5.5 79 .5 71 .6 7 = 7. .5 6,%.5 4.25 - - - 6 N d E d r~ 5 _ - - - - - - - - i \ y 4- - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - O _IIIIWIIIIIIWII! LJ-L_1_1-LI-JJJ-LJJ._1-LI-IJ_ IJJ_I_I_L_LLJL_IJI_I_J_I l_J.1_Ll_tJJ_I_I_IJ_LIJ_I1 1JJ_ _L_L_I-LI_ LIJ JJ. J-IJ_L_l_.l_L _LJ. t111111t1IW1111W Left Cantilever Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Right Cantilever 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 191.02 ksi Long term stress losses 12.31 ksi Final average stress 178.71 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.34 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .OOksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (201.42ksi; .746) 38.49 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 7.46 inch Total elongation after anchor set 7.46 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .080149 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 7.71 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES I Page 63 of 72 + v ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:53:36 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 99'UNI L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 197.45 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .904 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.242 ksi Relaxation 4.173 ksi Total long-term stress losses 13.259 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 64 of 72 E LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (99'UNI) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2-----3----4------5------ 6------- 7----8--- -9------- -10------ 11--- ---12- 1 19.04 1 4.25 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 186.86 189.33 193.38 2 22.50 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 193.38 196.89 200.93 3 30.50 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 200.93 201.39 197.01 4 24.54 1 7.50 1.00 4.25 .08 .50 .08 197.01 193.23 190.14 96.58 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initial stress (after release) 195.81 ksi Long term stress losses 13.26 ksi Final average stress 182.55 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.93 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (203.07ksi; .752) 47.04 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 7.93 inch Total elongation after anchor set 7.93 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082159 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 8.18 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .704; Max along tendon .752 Page 65 of 72 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION , INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:53 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 99'UNI 1.2 FILE NAME : 99'UNI 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Friction Losses Long-Term Losses 200 - f - _ - - - . _ - - - 19 5 1 0 - ''1 - _ 9 - 185 180 =J~~ - _ i- 1 - - - - ~ 75 - ~ - - - - 1 - LLI.1_LLL1..1-1..1..1.1_I.-L.LU_.1_1_I._I_I_I-1_.L_l-I. l_I.-IJ _I_LLL1-Ll_I~_J-1-1 I 1 -~_1-L1-L-L-L-1-1. - _1J_.1-LLL1_L1.~-tyl I Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 4.25 - 5 ----7. .5 - - - 7. .5 4.25 - 7 - - - - - - - - 6 - - - - - 5 - ---Dead-End - - Stressing-End--4 3 . - - - - - - - - - - + - - O ( I I I J 1 l J_.J_ L L.L L.._I~yL I I 1 1 J.L.LIJ... LL1_I11 LI 1.1_I .1_1.1.1 11_1_J ILLL_Ll I LL-1-.L_1.. _l.l 1 I-LLL LLyL_LLL1 ~L..JJ_ Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 195.81 ksi Long term stress losses 13.26 ksi Final average stress 182.55 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.93 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .0oksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (203.07ksi; .752) 47.04 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 7.93 inch Total elongation after anchor set 7.93 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082159 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 8.18 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 66 of 72 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:54:15 P R O J E C T T I T L E: FOURSEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 121'UNI L O N G- T E R M L 0 S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 197.45 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o volume to surface ratio of member 4.25 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .904 ksi Shrinkage 5.940 ksi Creep 2.242 ksi Relaxation 4.173 ksi Total long-term stress losses 13.259 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L 0 N G A T I O N' C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch"2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT RIGHT END Page 67 of 72 ~ i D LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (121'UNI) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/L X2/L X3/L start center right -1----2---- -3 ----4------5----- -6-------7----8--- -9------- - 10--- 11------ 12- 1 20.54 1 4.25 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 183.14 185.60 189.49 2 25.66 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 189.49 192.96 196.81 3 17.08 1 7.50 5.50 7.50 .08 .50 .08 196.81 198.88 201.11 4 12.10 1 7.50 7.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 201.11 202.34 202.53 5 29.14 1 7.50 1.00 7.50 .08 .50 .08 202.53 198.71 194.36 6 14.66 1 7.50 4.25 4.25 .08 .50 .08 194.36 191.69 190.43 119.18 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average ini tial stress (after release) 194.80 ksi Long term s tress losses 13.26 ksi Final avera ge stress 181.54 ksi Final avera ge force in tendon 27.78 k Anchor set in fluence from left pull ( Ooksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set in fluence from right pull (203.21ksi; .753) 45.38 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set Elongation at right pull after anchor set Total elongation after anchor set Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set Elongation at left pull before anchor set Elongation at right pull before anchor set Jacking force CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .705; Max along tendon .753 .00 inch 9.74 inch 9.74 inch .081735 inch/ft .25 inch 9.99 inch 33.05 kips Page 68 of 72 r-' ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST PO ST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:54 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOURSEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 121'UNI 1.2 FILE NAME : 121'UNI 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] Fridion Losses Lon Term Losses 200 - 195 am- - ~ J _ 190 = 185 - 180 - ~ 175 - - - 170 -LLt IJ J1.LLL1_L LL tJ _IJJ-LLLt_Ill_J-LL1- _LLLLLIJJ11111t11L.1 Wllll Lll LIl111111 1._I_.1_t-IJJ-_I_J_LI 1 ! ! 1 ! I-I11JJ11J1L1JJ1.11J 11. Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Span 5 Span 6 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 4.25 7. .5 7. ` T 5 7 5 7 - .5 7. .5 4.25 - - - - 6 - 5 - -DeadEnd - - - - - - - -S essing En - 3 - - = - - - 2 I 1 1---- 1 - -5..5----- - i ---2s - O _ l_.1 _1.1.1 I LLI.I_I _I-1-.I 1.1 .I 1. 1_I. 1 1_1.._1. L_I.J_LL11. ! 1-LLl_I-L1_LIJ.11J1LLLLI.JJ_l_I_l 1J1L11LL1111_.1H1 _I-1_L1J.J-L1J~LJ~JJyJ-J-Lj _LLLL LLI111..1_I_Ll11WL Span 1 Span 2 Span 3 Span 4 Span 5 Span 6 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 194.80 ksi Long term stress losses 13.26 ksi Final average stress 181.54 ksi Final average force in tendon 27.78 k Anchor set influence from left pull ( .00ksi; .000) .00 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (203.21ksi; .753) 45.38 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set .00 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set 9.74 inch Total elongation after anchor set 9.74 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .081735 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set .25 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set 9.99 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 69 of 72 s ADAPT CORPORATION 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA Tel: (650) 306 2400, Fax: (650) 364 4678 E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Standard 4.05 ADAPT POST-TENSIONING STRESS LOSS & ELONGATION PROGRAM LICENSED TO: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. This program calculates the long-term and immediate stress losses in a post- tensioned tendon. It outputs the elongations at the stressing ends and the final stress profile along the tendon. DATE: Dec 4, 2007 TIME: 10:54:53 P R O J E C T T I T L E FOUR SEASONS S P E C I F I C T I T L E 149' UNI L O N G- T E R M L O S S C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Post-tensioning system UNBONDED Type of strand LOW LAX Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of strand 28600.00 ksi Estimate of initial average compression 139.86 psi Concrete strength at 28 days 5000.00 psi Average weight of concrete NORMAL Estimated age of concrete at stressing 3 days Modulus of elasticity of concrete at stressing 3122.00 ksi Modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days 4030.50 ksi Estimate of average relative humidity 60. o Volume to surface ratio of member 6.00 in CALCULATED VALUES : Elastic shortening .641 ksi Shrinkage 5.103 ksi Creep 1.588 ksi Relaxation 4.236 ksi Total long-term stress losses 11.568 ksi F R I C T I O N & E L O N G A T I O N C A L C U L A T I O N S: INPUT PARAMETERS : Coefficient of angular friction (meu) .06000 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction (K) .00080 rad/ft Ultimate strength of strand 270.00 ksi Ratio of jacking stress to strand's ultimate strength .80 Anchor set .25 inch Cross-sectional area of strand .153 inch-2 Total Number of Strands per Tendon 1 STRESSING AT BOTH ENDS Page 70 of 72 ' C LEGEND : P = Tendon profile type defined as: 1=reversed parabola; 2=partial/regular parabola; 3=harped; 4=general X1/L etc = horizontal distances to control points in geometry of the tendon divided by span length Stresses tabulated are after anchor set but before long-term losses. TENDON ID, GEOMETRY AND STRESS PROFILE (149'-UNI) LENGTH < TENDON HEIGHT in.> Horizontal ratios STRESS (ksi) SPAN ft P start center right X1/1, X2/1, X3/L start center right -1----2-----3- ---4------5------6-------7----8---- 9------- - 10------ 11--- 12- 1 20.54 1 6.00 2.50 11.00 .08 .50 .08 186.86 189.90 194.27 2 30.50 1 11.00 1.00 11.00 .08 .50 .08 194.27 199.63 198.73 3 25.50 1 11.00 1.00 11.00 .08 .50 .08 198.73 193.68 192.70 4 28.00 1 11.00 1.00 11.00 .08 .50 .08 192.70 197.04 202.00 5 14.00 1 11.00 8.00 11.00 .08' .50 .08 202.00 200.74 197.62 6 28.66 1 11.00 1.00 6.00 .08 .50 .08 197.62 192.99 189.24 147.20 ft (total length of tendon) SUMMARY : Average initia l stress (after release) 195.53 ksi Long term stre ss losses 11.57 ksi Final average stress 183.96 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.15 k Anchor set inf luence from left pull (201.43ksi ; .746) 42.55 ft Anchor set inf luence from right pull (202.62ksi ; .750) 41.87 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 11.53 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .54 inch Total elongati on after anchor set 12.08 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon l ength after anchor set .082039 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 11.78 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .79 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips CRITICAL STRESS RATIOS : At stressing .800; At anchorage .701; Max along tendon .750 Page 71 of 72 ` ' . ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM E-mail: support@adaptsoft.com, Web site: www.adaptsoft.com ADAPT-FELT Ver.4.05 - Licenced to: SUNCOAST POST-TENSION, INC. Date: 12/4/2007 Time: 10:55 1- PROJECT TITLE : FOUR SEASONS 1.1 SPECIFIC TITLE : 149' UNI 1.2 FILE NAME : 149'-UNI 2 - TENDON STRESSES [ksi] 200 195 190 185 180 175 Friction Lcna-Term Span 3 -TENDON PROFILE [in] 10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0.0 Span Span Span Span Span 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 ressrng ressing I 2.5 ~L 8 Span Span Span Span Span Span 4-SUMMARY Average initial stress (after release) 195.53 ksi Long term stress losses 11.57 ksi Final average stress 183.96 ksi Final average force in tendon 28.15 k Anchor set influence from left pull (201.43ksi; .746) 42.55 ft Anchor set influence from right pull (202.62ksi; .750) 41.87 ft Elongation at left pull after anchor set 11.53 inch Elongation at right pull after anchor set .54 inch Total elongation after anchor set 12.08 inch Ratio of total elongation to tendon length after anchor set .082039 inch/ft Elongation at left pull before anchor set 11.78 inch Elongation at right pull before anchor set .79 inch Jacking force 33.05 kips 5 - DESIGNER'S NOTES Page 72 of 72 i-1EwNT iNl LP 2-v 4 D 4-0 V FL Nt. z=' Z S F V,4- N; Lo r f~ 6i " r - T-L r 5 0 S J_~ ! q o c o f, o n- F a G r ~jl o T- a m f11 m 5 _ ~ r goo ~ ° to q,j P ~ G p 0 ,n L Z 0 4- 0 i.6 t 7~ L 70 . p c o s ~~ve 4'1 W --1 D -4 ~ Vf O M=ZO-M c Z CA T o r- N ao s o 3.. MW ; D SC)"D mm_< cn C) --4 C m=CAST G =mn'-",g r- Ca H nD>cn tn -1 Z c -n D < O V3 m to C-7 = z O3'G7 N 2 Z rn ~ = f c~c c~ov o,zo ~ m o~ or*+ yT Z~CnCDl-4 ~ Z ~ c+7mOnv 1= C-3 TFF~ [f Dm~+yZ O Nm D Z --I cn -1 tJ - ~Zcn~~ L D m TvZ D C13 _ z$ N n nNtn~m~~ r., To0 Z= co 2 f nl n T D --'i 1~ o '.~ennC7°Z O z D 2-p D7°Z~Oe C) D [ DVDfA~~e rln-~-~1 T .1-L-11 , r '`J e AL-4111 I mm o p 2 !J ! 0 N 0 ',A a a 0. rS j ~Z m o n 0 s rn a e C ~ ~ a ° A awe ~ I~I~I~I~I+I o~L r- j o' C 2 ~P T rn N a~ c~ a Ed ~!~~1 § m mW v0 UI z o^a' 3 E ¢ ib o o~A~ r CA 15 G m v R 23 ~-A c a `v m z C) d•cr, x, m 1= z~u~D Zc RI c y ao 1ZT o_ ~°l ' M 3 o c a mzz-~O jl {l moo~>z a T. x a c v o ai r 1 Y ( m o m Z L ti i 0 m "Zrn 'A r s ° ° c _ _ _ ` r. z p 2 ` ylrl nr 1 Ul m r N (/1 c --•e ° _ - - _ r. •v. Lei 1 x ; r , 14 n 9n . p Z W ~n _ _ - G 7~e~7o~ev r LIM ° i o: a vn v ~Y r N -1 o c: r. vn 0 -1 ~ w ~ ° ; 3 c 3 ~ ~-rW m u ~ v ~,.e .o 3 ~ rL r i tit 1 J 6 m T jj {.1 y m L c / Z n NN r rn 6~.~ i p 0 o b_ N i oodoca f0f0~'o~ _ c L L o m " N N O NO ~ ~ N ~ ° d O O~ C r C~ N N O r¢c2Cj«L°.~ 3 d5 v •-a`Ni U d L "O V 0 -6 s C O E 'C .D ° E N 7 U O C Y Ej`°'~~idOTi~cU Oa aO O m ~~2 m ~ Q, ~ y ¢EH>>m~i N N T.d 7 Q C 7 N O to C O I¢ .5,9? Q) 0 (D o ~y-c y a cU m v rot ¢Oo[Q C~ r U Y Y O C N Q) C r O cz O❑ L ❑ o ~ c rnaNi oU'S `~U ~ V E c N~ `p C N L O~.C C C •L.. > C _.L.. Q ~ d N fC d O NN€7Eoa•NOco ~ g d Qa nc N~ 0 0 m ~yao~~a3iacimcCl) a _ ~S-°coc~y~~ ~oEo ~ ~va44iOd~.c_rv7 ~.o~,o co O C 7 E C p N~~ (n OI m a N O d L N~ C L N E y 7 in 3 y N T~ R N¢ Q N d C U O V O V `O d E U CO ¢co- C (C C F~J U > O 7 5) o -5 1A ~ N N OC L ~ ~ O~~ y 7= O N 3 `tl ~ N m ~w ° d v d ~ m° dDro ~ 3 ~ S=va¢a ~c> =o sQ~❑❑❑ ❑ 00 O M TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Permit # B06-0196 Project PRJ03-0468 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Status . ISSUED Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD Applied 07/18/2006 Parcel No...: 210107101016 Issued . 11/28/2007 - '6SO j - C;,(G ~ Expires . 09/26/2007 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR LAYTON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC 9090 S. SANDY PARKWAY SANDY UTAH 84040 License: 333-A APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS 600 FOSHAY TOWER 821 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 License: C000001981 07/19/2006 07/19/2006 Phone: (801) 568-9090 07/19/2006 Phone: 612-332-1500 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Occupancy Type NIGHT CLUBS (A2) ZONE 4 IB CHURCHES (A3) ZONE 4 IB BUSINESS(B)& HMP (H5 ZONE 4 IB EDUCATIONAL (E) ZONE 4 IB INDUSTRIAL/MOD HAZ ( ZONE 4 IB MERCANTILE (M) ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/HOTELS ( ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/MULTFAM( ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/MOD HAZ (S1) ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/LOW HAZ(S2) ZONE 4 IB Totals... TOV Adjusted Valuation: 3,237,002.91 Revision Valuation Factor Sq Feet Valuation 299.08 27,353 $8,180,735.24 369.90 8,605 $3,182,989.50 300.40 31,130 $9,351,452.00 322.53 670 $216,095.10 183.77 29,600 $5,439,592.00 220.56 2,445 $539,269.20 302.22 86,991$26,290,420.02 250.22 133,695$33,453,162.90 169.75 23,080 $3,917,830.00 167.15 75,773$12,665,456.95 399,510$103,237,002.9- $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $237,002.91 FEE SUMMARY Building > 378, 777.45 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0. 00 Total Calculated Fees 157, 067.90 Plan Check 378, 777.45 Recreation Fee--------------> 399, 510.00 Additional Fees-----------> $0. 00 Investigation-> $0. 00 TOTAL FEES > 157, 067.90 Total Permit Fee--------> 157, 067.90 Will Call-----> $3.00 Payments > 157, 067.90 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0.00 Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e-mailed to applicant. 12/18/2006 cdavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set for plan c stamped by TOV 12/13/06. An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer. 03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR:1215- G&E permit approval only. Conditic apply. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only 06/12/2007 CDAVIS Action: PA Tower Crane footing pads. No additional fees assessed 07/16/2007 jplano Action: CR Additional work being requested to be adder phasing, correction letter sent. 08/01/2007 jplano Action: CR Second correction letter sent, insuffient information supplied. 3) The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested added work full to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design profession architect and/or engineer. The design professionals are to verify that the additi( being requested is not in conflict with the corrections that are requested regard: building permit. All sheets are to be stamped and signed by the associated design professional. The architectural and the plumbing sheets have not been stamped. The stamp on the stri sheets has not been signed. The stamp on the electrical sheets has not been signet 4 There is insufficient detail to approve this submittal. Some examples are: a) There are several sections that are pertinent to this request that are not pros b) The elevator pit sections 10/S4.04, 18/S4.04, 19/S4.04, 20/S4.04 are missing. c) Ramp transition section 22/S6.01, 6/S6.01, 7/S4.04 are missing d) Exterior foundation wall connection to the matt slab 9/S6.01D, 27/S6.01, 61S.0- 7/S6.01 e) Sump pit details 28/S4.04 and 29/S4.04 f) Column schedule, transition of the columns to slab? g) Slab steps 11/S6.01D. This review has stopped because of lack of information. to 5 The Public Works Department in Vail has not approved the submittal for additionE be added to the phasing. Their approval will be necessary. 08/06/2007 jplano Action: PA Additional work approved for phasing. Under plumbing, underground electrical, rebar and concrete placement for elevator and sl pits. NO APPROVAL FOR MAT SLAB 09/11/2007 jplano Action: AP Full permit approved, see conditions 10/22/2007 DPLACE Action: PA REV 4 IR. 5881: Approved shop drawings for only No charge. 10/22/2007 dplace Action: PA REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAI CHARGE. 11/13/2007 ependley Action: AP REV5/IR6042. Approved shop drawings for de: stamps. No added valuation. 11/15/2007 ependley Action: AP Rev6/IR6057. Approved RFI-0221 and 0237 wit responses. No added valuation. Added plan review fee of $60.00 due Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the He Cross Utility relocation permit request. The applicant shall remove only those trees wh: absolutely necessary for the utility relocation work. 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the application to dewater the site. 03/31/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning recieved a bond to cover the Grad: Excavation in the amount of 3.2 million. Planning has approved the grading and ex( permit. 06/25/2007 Warren Action: COND Planning has approved the full building pei dated recieved on May 29, 2007, with a single condition. A complete Design Review aplication will need to be submitted for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive. 08/20/2007 Warren Action: AP The set of plans provided to allow fro the of some work prior to release of a full building permit has been approved. The plans date stamped July 26, 2007 09/05/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning is approving the set of plans datE August 3, 2007, with the condition that the applicant submits a revised landscaping plan foi and approval prior to requesting a TCO. 11/02/2007 GRUTHER Action: AP CHARGE. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN 04/17/06. REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAL Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding. Review: Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied: 1. Fire Dept staging on south side of project is shown on east end. The apporved f on the west end. The hydrant on the west end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on south the of work side. Sheet A0.3.00 2. Sheet A0.3.05 does not show an acceptable route to the interior of the buildinc Fire Command Center. 3. The plans submitted by RJA are not stamped and are labeled "Not for Constructic 4. The plans show a dead end corridor behind the front desk. 5. 12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is 91 Relocate electrical disconnect to the trailer or provide ready access on southwest site. Location as proposed on plan submitted 12/13/06 is not accepted. 03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: PA g and e permit is approved 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E only 07/11/2007 McGee Action: AP Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3A approved for I: as submitted 7 11 07. 09/07/2007 McGee Action: AP The full permit is approved as noted: Life Safety Report 5 22 07 1. LSR, MOU's, and Admin Mod's must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protect: Engineer of Record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-function and ballroom is not accepted. RJA alledgedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence ha: been presented. 3. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans, is not accepted. 5. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additionz review. Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 10/20/2006 is Action: DN Awaiting for additional information 12/20/2006 is Action: PA Approval to allow grading and prep work foi installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for t site access for small construction vehicles ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive. 03/26/2007 is Action: PA Staging plan for Phase 1 of the G&E permit approved only. Engineer approval for the G&E permit still required currently under review. staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only 08/07/2007 csalli approved, no approval for mat slab 09/13/2007 csalli 10/04/2007 TK in Action: AP additional work proposed for phased permit Action: DN waiting for executed MOU Action: AP Approved Building Permit with the condtion: the memo dated 8/5/07 from Chad Salli. Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 4Z9-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. 1 ~ SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit # B06-0196 as of 11-28-2007 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS J. BRINK 612-332-1500 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Conditions: Cond: CON0008815 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3/28/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 Applied: 07/18/2006 Issued: 11/28/2007 To Expire: 09/26/2007 The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the full building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original comment number for clarity. General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule" to prevent a room that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor". The Fire and Life Safety Report prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants. These will be required for full permit issuance. General: The Fire & Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved prior to the approval for full building permit. 3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units 3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is discharging. 8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C-414, is actually a horizontal portion of Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or remove the designation of passageway. 10) See the general comment above. 11) See the general comment above. 12) See the general comment above. 13) See the general comment above. 16) See the general comment above. 22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be tested in accordance with ASTME 119, tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire-resistance rating not less than the fire-resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the window when responding for full building permit. 23) See the general comment above. 39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures. Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly. This item has no impact on the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building permit issuance. 42) See response the comment number 39. 46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space is not accessory. 46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 210A as there is no access to stair Q. Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel. 49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved by the Town of Vail's Building Official. 57 through 61 and 149) The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 14 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 17 (BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FRI INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED Cond: 35 (P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: 5 (PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEME LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPR SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC. Cond: CON0009095 The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review aplication for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs added from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive, within 30 days of the release of the building permit. Cond: CON0009121 The applicant shall submit a seperate Design Review application for review and approval for all signage design, locations, and materials prior to installation. Cond: CON0009294 The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan which addresses the landscaping conflicts created by the shallow soild depths on the culvert containing Spraddle Creek. This plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to requesting a certifcate of occupancy. Cond: CON0009330 SAFEbui'k inc. COLORADO Building Department Services November 13, 2007 Charlie Davis Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: PROJECT: PERMIT NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: INTERNAL REF ADDRESS: Dear Mr. Davis: Four Seasons Shorawings p/d 606-0196 5 6042 1 Vail R# SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewefiYonly for designer stamps. Plans: 3 copies submittal #03200-007 (stud rails) 3 copies submittal #03200-008 (level 2 slab and column reinforcing) PIS e.TZA0.01 ~C9ta ~-Qt~ .1 (G No additional square footage- No added valuation Sincerely, Matthew Royer Building Official SAFEbuilt Colorado matt.roy rgSAFEbuilt.com Page 1 of 1 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓Z:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov-b06-0196 revs FAL.doc HKS HILL GLAZIER STUDIO Transmittal To Building Department / SAFEbuilt Colorado Firm Town of Vail Date November 8, 2007 Via Hand delivered Project Name: Vail Four Seasons Hotel Project No. We are Transmitting ® Shop Drawings ❑ Print/Copies ❑ Originals ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Digital Media \V/- 71- Pn, J1 TOWN OF VAIL ❑ Herewith ❑ Under separate cover ❑ For your checking and approval ❑ For your disposition ❑ Return copies for our disposition ❑ Submittal V Description: 3 copies, Layton Submittal #03200-007 (Stud Rails) from Suncoast. 3 copies Layton Submittal #03200-008 (Level 2 Slab and Column Reinforcing) from Banner. Remarks: Copies to: David Brooks (transmittal only) d:Uny documentsfts transmittal.doc 925 ALMA STREET Sent By: Mike Perkin HKS/HGS Vail HKS-749A PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94301-2405 650.617.0366 FAX 650.617.0373 SAFEW"Atinc. COLORADO Building Department Services October 22, 2007 Charlie Davis Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: PROJECT: PERMIT NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: INTERNAL REF ADDRESS: Dear Mr. Davis: oclul 4 Seasons B06-0196 4 5881 1 Vail Road SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed the documents for conformance to the International Codes as adopted by the Town of Vail. SAFEbuilt Colorado finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction with conditions. Plans: Shop drawings of foundation. Reviewed for stamp only. Sincerely, kA;L~~~ Matthew Royer Building Official matt.royergSAFEbuilt.com SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office-/ P.O. Box 1618,/ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓Z:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\1306-0196 rev 4 FAL.doc HKS HILL GLAZIER STUDIO Transmittal To Town of Vail Firm Building Department Date October 15, 2007 Via Hand delivered Project Name: Vail Four Seasons Hotel Project No. We are Transmitting ® Shop Drawings ❑ Herewith ❑ Print/Copies ❑ Under separate cover ❑ Originals ❑ For your checking and approval ❑ Samples ❑ For your disposition ❑ Specifications ❑ Return copies for our disposition ❑ Digital Media ❑ Description: 3 Sets, Layton Submittal #03200-006 (Shearwall Rebar Shop Drawings from Banner Rebar) Remarks: D 1 2001 O :T Copies to: LTOVWVN pF VAIL Sent By: Mike Perkin HKSIHGS Vail dAmy documentsfts transmittal.doc 925 ALMA STREET HKS-749A PALO ALTO. CALIFORNIA 94301-2405 650.617.0366 FAX 650.617.0373 r SAFEW'10in c. COLORADO Building Department Services October 22, 2007 Charlie Davis Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: PROJECT: PERMIT NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: INTERNAL REF ADDRESS: Dear Mr. Davis: 4 Seasons B06-0196 3 5512 1 Vail Road SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed the documents for conformance to the International Codes as adopted by the Town of Vail. SAFEbuilt Colorado finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction with conditions. Plans: Shop drawings of foundation. Reviewed for stamp only. Sincerely, Matthew Royer Building Official matt.royer(&SAFEbuilt.com SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓Z:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\B06-0196 rev 3 FAL.doc r Transmittal To HKS HILL GLAZIER STUDIO Firm Town of Vail, Building Department Date September 10, 2007 Via Hand delivered Project Name: Vail Four Seasons Hotel Project No. We are Transmitting ® Shop Drawings ❑ Print/Copies ❑ Originals ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Digital Media ❑ Herewith ❑ Under separate cover ❑ For your checking.and approval ❑ For your disposition ❑ Return copies for our disposition Description: 3 sets, Layton Construction Submittal #03200-001 (Mat Slab Refinforcing, Banner Rebar). 3 sets, Layton Construction Submittal #03200-002 (Level One Column Reinf'g, Banner Rebar). 3 sets, Layton Construction Submittal #03200-004 (Level One Wall Reinf'g, Banner Rebar). Remarks: Submitted to T.O.V. per directive from Matt Royer, SAFEbuilt. Copies ~to: David Brooks (transmittal only) D - SEP 10 2007 TOWN O d:1my documents\hks transmittal.doc 925 ALMA STREET PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94301-2405 Sent By: Mike Perkin HKS/HGS Vail HKS-749A 650.617.0366 FAX 650.617.0373 HKS HILL GLAZIER STUDIO Transmittal To Town of Vail Firm Building Department Date October 4, 2007 Via Hand delivered Project Name: Vail Four Seasons Hotel Project No. We are Transmitting ® Shop Drawings ❑ Herewith ❑ Print/Copies ❑ Under separate cover ❑ Originals ❑ For your checking and approval ❑ Samples ❑ For your disposition ❑ Specifications ❑ Return copies for our disposition ❑ Digital Media ❑ Description: Three copies Layton Submittal #03200-005 (Shear Walls from Banner Rebar). Remarks: Copies to: David Brooks (Transmittal only) dAmy documentsfts transmittal.doc v D 2007 V TOWN OF VAIL Sent By: Mike Perkin HKS/HGS Vail HKS-749A 925 ALMA STREET PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94301-2405 650.617.0366 FAX 650.617.0373 TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Permit # B06-0196 Project PRJ03-0468 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Status ISSUED Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD Applied..: 07/18/2006 Parcel No...: 210107101016 Issued . 11/28/2007 Expires. 09/26/2007 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 07/19/2006 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR LAYTON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC 07/19/2006 Phone: (801) 568-9090 9090 S. SANDY PARKWAY SANDY UTAH 84040 License: 333-A APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS 07/19/2006 Phone: 612-332- 1500 600 FOSHAY TOWER 821 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 License: 0000001981 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Occupancy NIGHT CLUBS (A2) CHURCHES (A3) BUSINESS(B)& HMP (H5 EDUCATIONAL (E) INDUSTRIAL/MOD HAZ ( MERCANTILE (M) RESIDENTIAL/HOTELS ( RESIDENTIAL/MULTFAM( STORAGE/MOD HAZ (S1) STORAGE/LOW HAZ(S2) Type Factor Sq Feet Valuation ZONE 4 IB 299.08 27,353 $8,180,735.24 ZONE 4 IB 369.90 8,605 $3,182,989.50 ZONE 4 IB 300.40 31,130 $9,351,452.00 ZONE 4 IB 322.53 670 $216,095.10 ZONE 4 IB 183.77 29,600 $5,439,592.00 ZONE 4 IB 220.56 2,445 $539,269.20 ZONE 4 IB 302.22 86,991$26,290,420.02 ZONE 4 IB 250.22 133,695$33,453,162.90 ZONE 4 IB 169.75 23,080 $3,917,830.00 ZONE 4 IB 167.15 75,773$12,665,456.95 Totals 399,510$103,237,002.9* TOV Adjusted Valuation: 3,237,002.91 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $237,002.91 r**rrrr*+****err**are*rrrr*rr****rarrar*rarrrr**rrrrrarrr***aaraea FEE SUMMARY r*rarrr******rr*rrrrarrrrerra***********+**rr****rerrreeere Building > 378, 777.45 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees 157, 067.90 Plan Check 378, 777.45 Recreation Fee--------------> 399, 510. 00 Additional Fees-----------> $120. 00 Investigation-> $0.00 TOTAL FEES > 157, 067.90 Total Permit Fee---------- > 157, 187.90 Will Call-----> $3.00 Payments > 157, 187.90 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0.00 Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e-mailed to applicant. 12/18/2006 cdavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set for plan c by TOV 12/13/06. An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer. 03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR:1215- G&E permit approval only. Conditic 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only 06/12/2007 CDAVIS Action: PA Tower Crane footing pads. No additional fees assessed 07/16/2007 jplano Action: CR Additional work being requested to be adder phasing, correction letter sent. 08/01/2007 jplano Action: CR Second correction letter sent, insuffient supplied. 3) The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design profession architect and/or engineer. The design professionals are to verify that the additic being requested is not in conflict with the corrections that are requested regard: building permit. Ali sheets are to be stamped and signed by the associated design professional. The architectural and the plumbing sheets have not been stamped. The stamp on the stri sheets has not been signed. The stamp on the electrical sheets has not been signet 4 There is insufficient detail to approve this submittal. Some examples are: a) There are several sections that are pertinent to this request that are not pro' b) The elevator pit sections 10/S4.04, 18/S4.04, 19/S4.04, 20/S4.04 are missing. c) Ramp transition section 22/S6.01, 6/S6.01, 7/S4.04 are missing d) Exterior foundation wall connection to the matt slab 9/S6.01D, 27/S6.01, 6/S.0' 7/S6.01 e) Sump pit details 28/S4.04 and 29/S4.04 f) Column schedule, transition of the columns to slab? g) Slab steps 11/S6.01D. This review has stopped because of lack of information. 5 The Public Works Department in Vail has not approved the submittal for additionz be added to the phasing. Their approval will be necessary. 08/06/2007 jplano Action: PA Additional work approved for phasing. Undej plumbing, underground electrical, rebar and concrete placement for elevator and si APPROVAL FOR MAT SLAB 09/11/2007 jplano Action: AP 10/22/2007 DPLACE Action: PA No charge. 10/22/2007 dplace Action: PA 11/13/2007 ependley Action: AP stamps. No added valuation. 11/15/2007 ependley Action: AP Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 11/30/2007 jplano Action: AP Full permit approved, see conditions REV 4 IR 5881: Approved shop drawings for REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONA] REV5/IR6042. Approved shop drawings for de: Rev7/IR6058. Approved RFI-0237, No added vz Rev6/IR6057. Approved RFI-0221, No added vz Added plan review fee of $60.00 due 12/18/2007 JPLANO Action: AP Rev9/IR6236. Approved shop drawings for po: slabs, no added valuation 12/26/2007 jplano Action: AP Rev10/IR6252. Approved changing a post ten: with thickened slab. $120.00 due 12/27/2007 MROYER Action: AP Revll/IR6266,6267. Rebar shop drawings rev: appropiate stamps, no charge Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the He Utility relocation permit request. The applicant shall remove only those trees wh: absolutely necessary for the utility relocation work. 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the al to dewater the site. 03/31/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning recieved a bond to cover the Grad: Excavation in the amount of 3.2 million. Planning has approved the grading and ex( permit. 06/25/2007 Warren Action: COND Planning has approved the full building pei dated recieved on May 29, 2007, with a single condition. A complete Design Review will need to be submitted for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs the pool deck to West Meadow Drive. 08/20/2007 Warren Action: AP The set of plans provided to allow fro the some work prior to release of a full building permit has been approved. The plans stamped July 26, 2007 09/05/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning is approving the set of plans datE 2007, with the condition that the applicant submits a revised landscaping plan foi approval prior to requesting a TCO. 11/02/2007 GRUTHER Action: AP REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONA] Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding. Review: Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied: 1. Fire Dept staging on south side of the west end. The hydrant on the west side. Sheet A0.3.00 2. Sheet A0.3.05 does not show an acc, Fire Command Center. 3. The plans submitted by RJA are not 4. The plans show a dead end corridor project is shown on east end. The apporved end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on eptable route to the interior of the buildinc stamped and are labeled "Not for Constructic behind the front desk. 5. 12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is gi Relocate electrical disconnect to the trailer or provide ready access on southwest site. Location as proposed on plan submitted 12/13/06 is not accepted. 03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: PA g and e permit is approved 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E only 07/11/2007 McGee Action: AP Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3A approved for l: as submitted 7 11 07. 09/07/2007 McGee Action: AP The full permit is approved as noted: Life Safety Report 5 22 07 1. LSR, MOU's, and Admin Mod's must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protect: of Record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-tunction and ballroom is not RJA alledgedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence ha: presented. 3. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans, is not accepted. 5. MOU 5/22/07 ret Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additionE Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 10/20/2006 is Action: DN Awaiting for additional information 12/20/2006 is Action: PA Approval to allow grading and prep work toi installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for t access for small construction vehicles ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive. 03/26/2007 is Action: PA Staging plan for Phase 1 of the G&E permit only. Engineer approval for the G&E permit still required currently under review. staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only 08/07/2007 csalli Action: AP additional work proposed for phased permit no approval for mat slab 09/13/2007 csalli Action: DN waiting for executed MOU 10/04/2007 TK Action: AP Approved Building Permit with the condtion: the memo dated 8/5/07 from Chad Salli. Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. ,'i SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit # B06-0196 as of 01-04-2008 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS J. BRINK 612-332-1500 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Conditions: Cond: CON0008815 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3/28/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 Applied: 07/18/2006 Issued: 11/28/2007 To Expire: 09/26/2007 The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the full building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original comment number for clarity. General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule" to prevent a room that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor". The Fire and Life Safety Report prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants. These will be required for full permit issuance. General: The Fire & Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved prior to the approval for full building permit. 3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units 3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is discharging. 8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C-414, is actually a horizontal portion of Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or remove the designation of passageway. 10) See the general comment above. 11) See the general comment above. 12) See the general comment above. 13) See the general comment above. 16) See the general comment above. 22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be tested in accordance with ASTME 119, tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire-resistance rating not less than the fire-resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the window when responding for full building permit. 23) See the general comment above. 39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures. Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly. This item has no impact on the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building permit issuance. 42) See response the comment number 39. 46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space is not accessory. 46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 210A as there is no access to stair Q. Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel. 49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved by the Town of Vail's Building Official. 57 through 61 and 149) The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 14 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 17 (BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FRAMING INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED FOR. Cond: 35 (P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: 5 (PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPRINT SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC. Cond: CON0009095 The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review aplication for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs added from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive, within 30 days of the release of the building permit. Cond: CON0009121 The applicant shall submit a seperate Design Review application for review and approval for all signage design, locations, and materials prior to installation. Cond: CON0009294 The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan which addresses the landscaping conflicts created by the shallow soild depths on the culvert containing Spraddle Creek. This plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to requesting a certifcate of occupancy. Cond: CON0009330 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R080000008 Amount: $120.00 01/04/200809:14 AM Payment Method: Check Init: DDG Notation: Mark Reed 5129 Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 157,187.90 This Payment: $120.00 Total ALL Pmts: 157,187.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300, PLAN CK - project GFP012 120.00 SAFEbluviltinc. COLORADO Building Department Services December 26, 2007 Charlie Davis Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: PROJECT: PERMIT NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: INTERNAL REF ADDRESS: Dear Mr. Davis: Four Seasons B06-0196 10 6252 1 Vail Road SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed RFI-0283, to replace a post tension cable with an 8' wide thickened slab. Plans: 1 - RFI-0283 1-81/2x 11 engineer stamped detail. Plan review fee: $120.00 Sincerel John Plano Plans Examiner / Senior Building Inspector SAFEbuilt Colorado john.plano SAFEbuilt.com Page 1 of 1 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:APlan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov-B06-0196 revl0 FAL.doc Layton Construction Company r~ 9090 South Sandv Parkway Sandv UT 84070 USA Subject: Slab Openings Project: Four Seasons Vail To, Hill Glazier Architects Mike Perkin Address: One Vail Road Vail, CO 81657 Phone: Fax: Entered By: Philip Daley Request For Information • RFI-0283 Printed On: 11{2612007 Page 1 of 1 Date: 1112612007 Job: 06320 Required: 1210512007 Cost Impact: Potentially Cost Amount: Proceed: No Schedule Impact: Potentially Days: Co-Author: Contact: Co-Aufhor RFI Number: Reference: Request: 1.) Sheet S2.05.1A (Bulletin # 2) shows a PT cable directly through a slab opening. This opening is along grid lines 6 and grid lines A6-A8. Please provide direction as to what needs to happen at this locate. 2.) 1s our understanding correct that there in no beam 56.7 along grid lines 6-A6 and grid lines 6-A8 on level 5 (refer to sheet S2.05.1 and sheet S2.05.1A)? Please confirm whether or not this beam has been removed. Suggestion: Answer: v Subject to inspecti,;n and Compliance to all Opening stays. Route PT cables on each side of opening. eievant Adopted Bu' and Municipal Codes. The beam 5B-7 is replaced by 8'-0" wide thicken slab Changes in Pla MU approved. see attached revised plan. Date rZ--, By Code: 2-003 -CuDc=- SAFEbuilt Colorado Horon Lee/ Nishkian Menninger 11-26-07 Answered By: Date: c s € ` "may Signed: AAt: 1 ~Ls I n-Z-I AY4, S REVIEWED BY DEK6Z007] SAFEbuilt Colorado 1~ op Lrwt-~ L I I I I -7- - - T - - - - - - - V o l I I I I ~ , ml I mi ^Aoo 11 sj~ 21 .03, T lY . ❑A 3#7x8' c T&B EW 10T3 - - - - - - - - - B3@12" Moo I I X _ AD 3#7T8cB THICKEN SLAB 2 E.SI TO MATCH BOTTOM I 4 I I ~ ~ E A 14T4 co, a _ - - 8 0 y 2 7 , ~ E Jt' t7.1L #6x6 _0 T8c , TYPI. AT PN _ j;,- «a;~ - - - I I ;T-TFN,,-InNFII SI AR F SAFFbdi/l t in c. (-0 - t.: R ADO Building Department Services December 18, 2007 Charlie Davis Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: PROJECT: PERMIT NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: INTERNAL REF ADDRESS: Dear Mr. Davis: Four Seasons B06-0196 9 6236 1 Vail Road SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed only for Engineering and Architectural Stamps. Plans: 3 sheets of general notes and details 4 sheets of Friction loss calculations One package of technical information, Encapsulation System Plan review fee: $0.00 No additional square footage- No added valuation Sincerel , John Plano Plans Examiner / Senior Building Inspector SAFEbuilt Colorado john.plano(a)SAFEbuilt.com 3:0-0 Page 1 of 1 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov-B06-0196 FAL.Rev9.doc TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Permit # B06-0196 Project PRJ03-0468 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Status. ISSUED Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD Applied 07/18/2006 Parcel No...: 210107101016 Issued . 10/04/2007 Expires . 09/26/2007 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 07/19/2006 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR LAYTON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC 07/19/2006 Phone: (801) 568-9090 9090 S. SANDY PARKWAY SANDY UTAH 84040 License: 333-A APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS 07/19/2006 Phone: 612-3 32-1500 600 FOSHAY TOWER 821 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 License: C000001981 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Occupancy Type NIGHT CLUBS (A2) ZONE 4 IB CHURCHES (A3) ZONE 4 IB BUSINESS(B)& HMP (H5 ZONE 4 IB EDUCATIONAL (E) ZONE 4 IB INDUSTRIAL/MOD HAZ ( ZONE 4 IB MERCANTILE (M) ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/HOTELS ( ZONE 4 IB RESIDENTIAL/MULTFAM( ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/MOD HAZ (S1) ZONE 4 IB STORAGE/LOW HAZ(S2) ZONE 4 IB Totals... Factor Sq Feet Valuation 299.08 27,353 $8,180,735.24 369.90 8,605 $3,182,989.50 300.40 31,130 $9,351,452.00 322.53 670 $216,095.10 183.77 29,600 $5,439,592.00 220.56 2,445 $539,269.20 302.22 86,991$26,290,420.02 250.22 133,695$33,453,162.90 169.75 23,080 $3,917,830.00 167.15 75,773$12,665,456.95 399,510$103,237,002.9* TOV Adjusted Valuation: 3,237,002.91 Revision Valuation $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $237,002.91 s*sss*ss*s*a*ss****ssassssa*sssssss***ss***++***+******ssssasa** FEE SUMMARY sass**+**:****r*****+*****+*sss*********►*******sssassss Building > 378, 777.45 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees 157, 067.90 Plan Check 378, 777.45 Recreation Fee--------------> 399, 510.00 Additional Fees $0.00 Investigation-> $0.00 TOTAL FEES > 157, 067.90 Total Permit Fee---------- > 157, 067. 90 Will Call-----> $3.00 Payments > 157,067.90 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0. 00 Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e-mailed to applicant. 12/18/2006 cdavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set for plan c by TOV 12/13/06. An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer. 03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR:1215- G&E permit approval only. Conditic 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only 06/12/2007 CDAVIS Action: PA Tower Crane footing pads. No additional fees assessed 07/16/2007 jplano Action: CR Additional work being requested to be adde( phasing, correction letter sent. 08/01/2007 jplano Action: CR Second correction letter sent, insuttient : supplied. 3) The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design protessioi architect and/or engineer. The design protessionals are to verity that the additi( being requested is not in contlict with the corrections that are requested regard: building permit. All sheets are to be stamped and signed by the associated design protessional. ThE architectural and the plumbing sheets have not been stamped. The stamp on the stri sheets has not been signed. The stamp on the electrical sheets has not been signe( 4 There is insufficient detail to approve this submittal. Some examples are: a) There are several sections that are pertinent to this request that are not pro, b) The elevator pit sections 10/54.04, 18/54.04, 19/54.04, 20/54.04 are missing. c) Ramp transition section 22/56.01, 61S6.01, 7/54.04 are missing d) Exterior toundation wall connection to the matt slab 9/S6.01D, 27/S6.01, 6/5.0: 7/56.01 e) Sump pit details 28/54.04 and 29/S4.04 f) Column schedule, transition of the columns to slab? g) Slab steps 11/S6.01D. This review has stopped because of lack of information. 5 The Public Works Department in Vail has not approved the submittal for addition be added to the phasing. Their approval will be necessary. 08/06/2007 jplano Action: PA Additional work approved for phasing. Under plumbing, underground electrical, rebar and concrete placement for elevator and si APPROVAL FOR MAT SLAB 09/11/2007 jplano Action: AP Full permit approved, see conditions Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the He Utility relocation permit request. The applicant shall remove only those trees wh: absolutely necessary for the utility relocation work. 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the al to dewater the site. 03/31/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning recieved a bond to cover the Grad: Excavation in the amount of 3.2 million. Planning has approved the grading and ex( Item permit. 06/25/2007 Warren Action: COND Planning has approved the tull building pei dated recieved on May 29, 2007, with a single condition. A complete Design Review will need to be submitted for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs the pool deck to West Meadow Drive. 08/20/2007 Warren Action: AP The set of plans provided to allow tro the some work prior to release of a tull building permit has been approved. The plans stamped July 26, 2007 09/05/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning is approving the set of plans dat( 2007, with the condition that the applicant submits a revised landscaping plan toi approval prior to requesting a TCO. 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding. Review: Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied: 1. Fire Dept staging on south side of the west end. The hydrant on the west side. Sheet A0.3.00 2. Sheet A0.3.05 does not show an acc Fire Command Center. 3. The plans submitted by RJA are not 4. The plans show a dead end corridor project is shown on east end. The apporved end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on sptable route to the interior of the buildinc stamped and are labeled "Not for Constructic behind the front desk. 5. 12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is 91 Relocate electrical disconnect to the trailer or provide ready access on southwest site. Location as proposed on plan submitted 12/13/06 is not accepted. 03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: PA g and e permit is approved 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E only 07/11/2007 McGee Action: AP Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3A approved for is as submitted 7 11 07. 09/07/2007 McGee Action: AP The full permit is approved as noted: Life Safety Report 5 22 07 1. LSR, MOU's, and Admin Mod's must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protect: of Record. 2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre-tunction and ballroom is not RJA alledgedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence ha: presented. 3. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted. 4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans, is not accepted. 5. MOU 5/22/07 ret Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additionz Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 10/20/2006 is Action: DN Awaiting for additional information 12/20/2006 is Action: PA Approval to allow grading and prep work to] installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for t access for small construction vehicles ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive. 03/26/2007 is Action: PA Staging plan for Phase 1 of the G&E permit only. Engineer approval for the G&E permit still required currently under review. staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only 08/07/2007 csalli Action: AP additional work proposed for phased permit no approval for mat slab 09/13/2007 csalli Action: DN waiting for executed MOU 10/04/2007 TK Action: AP Approved Building Permit with the condtion: the memo dated 8/5/07 from Chad Salli. Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVAN BY TELEPHONE AT 4 -21 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. t OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit # B06-0196 as of 10-04-2007 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS J. BRINK 612-332-1500 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Conditions: Cond: CON0008815 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3/28/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 Applied: 07/18/2006 Issued: 10/04/2007 To Expire: 09/26/2007 The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the full building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original comment number for clarity. General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule" to prevent a room that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor". The Fire and Life Safety Report prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants. These will be required for full permit issuance. General: The Fire & Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved prior to the approval for full building permit. 3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units 3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is discharging. 8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C-414, is actually a horizontal portion of Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or remove the designation of passageway. 10) See the general comment above. 11) See the general comment above. 12) See the general comment above. 13) See the general comment above. 16) See the general comment above. 22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be tested in accordance with ASTME 119, tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire-resistance rating not less than the fire-resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the window when responding for full building permit. 23) See the general comment above. 39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures. Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly. This item has no impact on the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building permit issuance. 42) See response the comment number 39. 46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space is not accessory. 46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 210A as there is no access to stair Q. Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel. 49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved by the Town of Vail's Building Official. 57 through 61 and 149) The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed. Cond: I (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 14 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 17 (BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FRAMING INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED FOR. Cond: 35 (P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: 5 (PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPRINT SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC. Cond: CON0009095 The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review aplication for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs added from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive, within 30 days of the release of the building permit. Cond: CON0009121 The applicant shall submit a seperate Design Review application for review and approval for all signage design, locations, and materials prior to installation. Cond: CON0009294 The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan which addresses the landscaping conflicts created by the shallow soild depths on the culvert containing Spraddle Creek. This plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to requesting a certifcate of occupancy. Cond: CON0009330 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprinted on 10-04-2007 at 11:43:52 10/04/2007 Statement Statement Number: R070002090 Amount: $510,075.80 10/04/200711:43 AM Payment Method: Check Init: DDG Notation: BDRV Holdings LLC 2009 Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 157,067.90 This Payment: $510,075.80 Total ALL Pmts: 157,067.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 6,748.72 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 55,282.90 PF 00100003112300, PLAN CK - project GFP012 48,534.18 RF 11100003112700 RECREATION FEES 399,510.00 TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No...: 210107101016 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 07/19/2006 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR LAYTON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC 07/19/2006 9090 S. SANDY PARKWAY SANDY UTAH 84040 License: 333-A APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS 07/19/2006 600 FOSHAY TOWER 821 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 License: 0000001981 Permit # B06-0196 Project PRJ03-0468 Status ISSUED Applied..: 07/18/2006 Issued . 081091200V Expires . 09/26/2007 Phone: (801) 568-9090 Phone: 612-332-1500 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Occupancy Type Factor Sq Feet Valuation Totals... $88,092,000.00* TOV Adjusted Valuation: 8,092,000.00 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $092,000.00 ..assss*e**r*+**+*s*****s***►***s***ss+++*+**+***s•s************ FEE SUMMARY +►xw**s►**e*********►*****s•*►*rr**a*+*:*~**s*****■s+*+• Building > 323, 494.55 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees 646, 992.10 Plan Check 323, 494.55 Recreation Fee--------------> $0.00 Additional Fees-----------> $0. 00 Investigation-> $0.00 TOTAL FEES > 646, 992.10 Total Permit Fee---------- > 646, 992.10 Will Call----> $3 .0 0 Payments > 646, 992 . 10 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0. 00 **s.*•+~t*~r+♦*rt*s*»s***s•rr*r~*►~er*s*s*s**s*x*►s►*►*~+s****s~**r**r****sr********+****►***►*as*****~.+s*+**s*~:•s.:»se*+:~+:.**++.*s+•***s+•.+.+ Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e-mailed to applicant. 12/18/2006 cdavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set for plan by TOV 12/13/06. An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer. 03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR:1215- G&E permit approval only. Conditic 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only 06/12/2007 CDAVIS Action: PA Tower Crane footing pads. No additional fees assessed 07/16/2007 jplano Action: CR Additional work being requested to be adde( phasing, correction letter sent. 08/01/2007 jplano Action: CR Second correction letter sent, insuffient : supplied. 3) The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design professioi architect and/or engineer. The design professionals are to verify that the additi( being requested is not in conflict with the corrections that are requested regard: building permit. All sheets are to be stamped and signed by the associated design professional. The architectural and the plumbing sheets have not been stamped. The stamp on the stri sheets has not been signed. The stamp on the electrical sheets has not been signet 4 There is insufficient detail to approve this submittal. Some examples are: a) There are several sections that are pertinent to this request that are not pro' b) The elevator pit sections 10/54.04, 18/54.04, 19/54.04, 20/54.04 are missing. c) Ramp transition section 22/56.01, 6/56.01, 7/54.04 are missing d) Exterior foundation wall connection to the matt slab 9/S6.01D, 27/56.01, 61S.0: 7/56.01 e) Sump pit details 28/54.04 and 29/54.04 f) Column schedule, transition of the columns to slab? g) Slab steps 11/S6.01D. This review has stopped because of lack of information. 5 The Public Works Department in Vail has not approved the submittal for additions be added to the phasing. Their approval will be necessary. 08/06/2007 jplano Action: PA Additional work approved for phasing. Under plumbing, underground electrical, rebar and concrete placement for elevator and si APPROVAL FOR MAT SLAB Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the He Utility relocation permit request. The applicant shall remove only those trees wh: absolutely necessary for the utility relocation work. 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the al to dewater the site. 03/31/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning recieved a bond to cover the Grad: Excavation in the amount of 3.2 million. Planning has approved the grading and ex( permit. 06/25/2007 Warren Action: COND Planning has approved the full building per dated recieved on May 29, 2007, with a single condition. A complete Design Review will need to be submitted for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs the pool deck to West Meadow Drive. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding. Review: Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied: 1. Fire Dept staging on south side of the west end. The hydrant on the west side. Sheet A0.3.00 2. Sheet A0.3.05 does not show an acc, Fire Command Center. 3. The plans submitted by RJA are not 4. The plans show a dead end corridor project is shown on east end. The apporved end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on aptable route to the interior of the buildinc stamped and are labeled "Not for Constructic behind the front desk. 5. 12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is gl Relocate electrical disconnect to the trailer or provide ready access on southwest site. Location as proposed on plan submitted 12/13/06 is not accepted. 03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: PA g and e permit is approved 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E only 07/11/2007 McGee Action: AP Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3A approved for 1_ as submitted 7 11 07. Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 10/20/2006 is Action: DN Awaiting for additional information 12/20/2006 is Action: PA Approval to allow grading and prep work fol installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for t access for small construction vehicles ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive. 03/26/2007 is Action: PA Staging plan for Phase 1 of the G&E permit only. Engineer approval for the G&E permit still required currently under review. staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only 08/07/2007 csalli Action: AP additional work proposed for phased permit no approval for mat slab Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE B T E AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. SIGNATURE OF O OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit # B06-0196 as of 08-09-2007 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS J. BRINK 612-332-1500 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Conditions: Cond: CON0008815 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3/28/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 Applied: 07/18/2006 Issued: 08/09/2008 To Expire: 09/26/2007 The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the full building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original comment number for clarity. General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule" to prevent a room that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor". The Fire and Life Safety Report prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants. These will be required for full permit issuance. General: The Fire & Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved prior to the approval for full building permit. 3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units 3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is discharging. 8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C-414, is actually a horizontal portion of Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or remove the designation of passageway. 10) See the general comment above. 11) See the general comment above. 12) See the general comment above. 13) See the general comment above. 16) See the general comment above. 22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be tested in accordance with ASTME 119, tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire-resistance rating not less than the fire-resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the window when responding for full building permit. 23) See the general comment above. 39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures. Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly. This item has no impact on the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building permit issuance. 42) See response the comment number 39. 46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space is not accessory. 46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 210A as there is no access to stair Q. Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel. 49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved by the Town of Vail's Building Official. 57 through 61 and 149) The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 14 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 17 (BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FRAMING INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED FOR. Cond: 35 (P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: 5 (PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPRINT SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC. Cond: CON0009095 The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review aplication for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs added from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive, within 30 days of the release of the building permit. Cond: CON0009121 The applicant shall submit a seperate Design Review application for review and approval for all signage design, locations, and materials prior to installation. I APPLICATION WILL NOT BE A EPTE IN MPLETE OR UNSIGNE _ O Q Building Permit # TOWN O V 4 EVISION TO TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING PE If C DIE Separate Permits are required for electrical, plumbing, mec ical, etc75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 ***All Revision submittals must include the Field Set of approved plans. urther iC) >LkVAaC will be preformed until the revisions are approved. * * TOWN OF IL AI /C'-1 CONTRACTOR INFORMATION General Contractor: Town of Vail Reg. No.: Contact and Phone #'s: 'TO.v m sTR dcTio i. / 3 3 3 A /K es.c ib,~~v 7 70-LZ Z - -V f ATTENTION: JOE, JR, CHARLIE, GREG, CHRIS Contractor Si a re: rnmpl F F RFVICInM_Q FVAI I IATInNS FnR R1111 mKir. PERMIT [Labor & Materials) REVISED AMOUNT: $ o ELECTRICAL: $ o OTHER: $ p PLUMBING: S I MECHANICAL: $ p REVISED TOTAL: $ O Fnr Pnrrcl It rnnfay-f Fanla rnunfv Accaccnrc l7ffira at 971)-328-8640 or visit www.eaale-countv.com Parcel Job Name: ~v,~ SlASeN s 7[sa Ae7- Job Address: -CAVE V,414 Rr>,oO Legal Description Lot: Block: Filing: Fs ubdivision: Owners Name: Address: Phone: Architect/Designer: Address: Phone: Engineer: Address. Phone: REASON FOR REVISIONS: I ADOi7-/onr,s s_11o441c 00,01240 r o std ~S fo S!'O p~ Work Class: New( ) Addition( ) Remodel ( ) Repair ( ) Demo ( ) Other ( ) FWork Type: Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Both ( ) ) Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes( ) No( Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Two-family ( ) Multi-family ( ) Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other ( ) No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: No. of Accommodation Units in this building: No/T e of Fireplaces Existin : Gas Appliances Gas Los Wood/Pellet Wood Burning No/T e of Fireplaces Proposed: Gas Appliances Gas Los Wood/Pellet Wood Burning NOT ALLOWED Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes( ) No( ) Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes( ) No ( ) *~**k***** FnR nFFIrF I IRF nN1 Y Date Received: Permit Fee (10): Plan Ck Fee 80 Accepted By: Permit Fee (11): Plan Ck Fee (81):- Outsourced Terms: F:\cdev\FORMS\Permits\Building\building_revision_4-18-2007.doc Page 1 of 1 4/18/2007 SAFFbul It inc. l,:y(, i-%'AD0 Building Department Services 8/05/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 Re: PERMIT # B06-0196 FOUR SEASONS- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR ADDITIONAL UNDERGROUND WORK TO BE ADDED TO THE PHASING. The additional work approved to be added to the phasing of this project is listed below: 1) Underground plumbing 2) Underground electrical 3) Rebar and concrete placement associated with the elevator pits. 4) Rebar and concrete placement associated with the sump pits. The mat slab, foundation walls, columns, retaining walls, elevated floor slabs are NOT included. This approval is based on the submittal of half sized drawings from the architect. Sheets A2.01, A2.01.1, A2.01.1S, A2.01.2, A2.01.2S, A2.01.3, A2.01.3S, S1.0.1, S1.0.1A, S1.0.2, S1.0.2A, S2.0.1, S2.01.1, S2.01.2, S2.01.3, S4.04, S6.0.1, E2.01.1, E2.01.2, E2.01.3, E2.03.3, P2.01.1, P2.01.2, P2.01.3,P2.01.4, P2.02.3 and P2.03.3. This review was performed based on the architect's direction that all plan sheets are copies pulled from the plans to be submitted for full permit review. The documents approved for this phase have not been reviewed for full compliance with the plan review comments issued by the plan review team. The plans are being released for construction and inspection will be performed based on these plans. The owner and applicant must understand that they are proceeding at their own risk. Any errors or discrepancies discovered during the completion of plan review or inspections must be dealt with at the owner and applicant's own expense in a timely manner. Plan Review Comments Contact Perso . John Plano Plans Examiner/Senior Inspector SAFEbuilt 1286 Chambers Ave. #101 PO Box 1618 Eagle, CO 81631 (970)328-1790 Page 1 of 1 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\Additional work to phasing_FAL.doc s` SAFFbulltnc. Building Department Services SAFEbuilt Colorado PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS TO: Contractor Architect Layton Construction Hill Glazier Architects EMAIL: msheanshang(a)layton-const.com Attn: Douglas Atmore dcarley layton-const.com (650)617-0373 FAX NUMBER OF PAGES: FROM: DATE: BUILDING PERMIT INTERNAL REFERENCE OWNERS NAME: SITE ADDRESS: SUBDIVISION: OCCUPANCY GROUP: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: NUMBER OF STORIES: 2 John Plano 07/16/07 B06-0196 4604 Four seasons Resort 1 Vail Road Vail Mixed 1B 10 The design documents submitted for this project have been reviewed for compliance with the locally adopted codes and amendments. The following comments must be addressed before a building permit is issued. For processing: . Please submit (5) complete sets of revised construction documents containing the requested information or plan revisions with all revisions clouded or otherwise identified. . Please respond in writing to each comment by marking the attached list or creating a response letter. Indicate which plan sheet, detail, specification, or calculation shows the requested information. Please send revisions to the attention of the plans examiner with the building permit application number noted. Responses such as "will comply with code" are not adequate. Revised drawings must clearly show code compliance. A RESPONSE LETTER MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THE REVISED PLAN SUBMITTAL. . Please be sure to include on the resubmittal the engineer's or architect's "wet" stamp signature registration number and date on the cover page of any structural calculations, all structural details and structural sheets of the plans. For commercial or multi-family projects all sheets of the plans must be stamped. V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\Phased Submittal.2.doc Page 1 of 2 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: Architectural Comments: This correction letter is based on a submittal from the contractor to include more work to the phasing of the project prior to the issuance of a full building permit. There is no application or contact information included. The submittal consisted of a lower floor plan (S2.0.1) highlighting two separate areas and a list of requested work to be added for each area. 1 This request is to be submitted by the design professional in responsible charge. (IBC 106.3.4) 2 Provide completed Town of Vail permit applications and pay associated fees for the permits being requested to be added to the phasing. The Town has received the plumbing and electrical applications. The request stated mechanical underground also. If mechanical is included please provide the application and fees. 3 The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested to be added to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design professional, architect and/or engineer. The design professionals are to verify that the additional work being requested is not in conflict with the corrections that are requested regarding the full building permit. Please refer to the cover sheet for information and instructions for resubmitting plans. In order to avoid delays please check all requested information is included with the resubmitted plans. Plan Review Comments Contact Person: John Plano I.C.C. Plans Examiner SAFEbuilt 1286 Chambers Ave. #101 PO Box 1618 Eagle, CO 81631 (970)328-1790 V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\Phased Submittal.2.doc Page 2 of 2 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 Letter of Transmittal Layton Layton Construction Co., Inc., 9090 South Sandy Parkway, Sandy, Utah 84070 (801) 568-9090 * Fax (801) 569-5450 TO: Charlie Davis Town of Vail DATE: 13-Dec-06 JOB NO: 6030 ATTN: Charlie Davis RE: Four Seasons Permit # B 06-0196 WE ARE SENDING YOU VIA: E] Pick Up F-] Mail 0 Delivery Copies I Description I 1 Copy of level one showing colered areas of Area 1 and 3-A and 2. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: Q For Your Use F-1 For Review and Comment El As Requested El For Approval E Approved as Submitted Returned for Corrections See Remarks Approved as Noted 0 Rejected Please call if more information is needed or if you have any question. Mark Reed 970-401-1777 ~M F TOVvpki COPY TO: Project Files SIGNED: Mark Reed, Project Superintendent 970-401-1777 FOUR SEASONS RESORT - VAIL 1. Area 1 and Area 3A (West end of property and Northwest 2/3 of property: .14 a. Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing underground (including inspections allowing us to cover all pipe) b. Sump pits - these pits need to be installed so thawe can complete the S underground plumbing and install rebar mats. S T,e rA P~ c. Install all elevator pits d. Tie, install, and inspect reinforcing steel for the structural matt slab. --P e. Pour concrete matt slab f. Forming and reinforcing of vertical walls and columns on first floor 2. Area 2 (East end of property): a. Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing underground (including inspections allowing us to cover all pipe) b. Sump pits - these pits need to be installed so that we can complete the underground plumbing and install rebar mats. c. Install all elevator pits d. Tie, install, and inspect reinforcing steel for the structural matt slab. TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Permit # B06-0196 Project PRJ03-0468 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Status ISSUED Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD Applied 07/18/2006 Parcel No...: 210107101016 Issued . 03/30/2007 Expires . 09/26/2007 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR LAYTON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC 9090 S. SANDY PARKWAY SANDY UTAH 84040 License: 333-A APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC-THOMAS 600 FOSHAY TOWER 821 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 License: 0000001981 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POI FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS Occupancy Type Totals... 07/19/2006 07/19/2006 Phone: (801) 568-9090 07/19/2006 Phone: 612-332-1500 A 10 STORY POST TENSION RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL DL, RECREATION AND GUESTROOMS. Factor Sq Feet Valuation $88,092,000.00* TOV Adjusted Valuation: 8,092,000.00 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $092,000.00 FEE SUMMARY *****************************************************s***a Building > 323, 494.55 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees 646, 992.10 Plan Check---> 323, 494.55 Recreation Fee--------------> $0.00 Additional Fees-----------> $0.00 Investigation-> $0.00 TOTAL FEES > 646, 992.10 Total Permit Fee > 646, 992.10 Will Call-----> $3.00 Payments > 646, 992.10 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0.00 Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e-mailed to applicant. 12/18/2006 cdavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set for plan date stamped by TOV 12/13/06. An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer. 03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR:1215- G&E permit approval only. Conditions apply. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the Holy Cross Utility relocation permit request. The applicant shall remove only those trees which are absolutely necessary for the utility relocation work. 10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the application to dewater the site. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received 04/17/06. Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding. Review: Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied: 1. Fire Dept staging on south side of project is shown on east end. The apporved site was on the west end. The hydrant on the west end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on the south side. Sheet A0.3.00 2. Sheet A0.3.05 does not show an acceptable route to the interior of the building from the Fire Command Center. 3. The plans submitted by RJA are not stamped and are labeled "Not for Construction". 4. The plans show a dead end corridor behind the front desk. 5. 12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is granted. Relocate electrical disconnect to the trailer or provide ready access on southwest corner of site. Location as proposed on plan submitted 12/13/06 is not accepted. 03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: PA g and e permit is approved 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E only Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 10/20/2006 is Action: DN Awaiting for additional information 12/20/2006 is Action: PA Approval to allow grading and prep work for the installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for temp site access for small construction vehicles ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive. 03/26/2007 is Action: PA Staging plan for Phase 1 of the G&E permit is approved only. Engineer approval for the G&E permit still required currently under review. Phase 2 staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval. 03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and. Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN yADVANCE Y LEPHONE AT OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM-4PM. /l ~I~ SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit # B06-0196 as of 03-30-2007 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT, LLC-THOMAS J. BRINK 612-332-1500 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS. Conditions: Cond: CON0008815 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3/28/07 To: Hill-Glazier Architects Attn: Douglas Atmore 925 Alma Drive Palo Alto, CA 94301 Applied: 07/18/2006 Issued: 03/30/2007 To Expire: 09/26/2007 The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the full building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original comment number for clarity. General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule" to prevent a room that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor". The Fire and Life Safety Report prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants. These will be required for full permit issuance. General: The Fire & Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved prior to the approval for full building permit. 3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units 3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is discharging. 8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C-414, is actually a horizontal portion of Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or remove the designation of passageway. 10) See the general comment above. 11) See the general comment above. 12) See the general comment above. 13) See the general comment above. 16) See the general comment above. 22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be tested in accordance with ASTME 119, tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire-resistance rating not less than the fire-resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the window when responding for full building permit. 23) See the general comment above. 39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures. Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly. This item has no impact on the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building permit issuance. 42) See response the comment number 39. 46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO-ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space is not accessory. 46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 210A as there is no access to stair Q. Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel. 49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved by the Town of Vail's Building Official. 57 through 61 and 149) The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed. Cond: l (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 14 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 17 (BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FRAMING INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALL] FOR. Cond: 35 (P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: 5 (PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPRINT SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprinted on 10-31-2007 at 11:05:37 10/31/2007 Statement Statement Number: R060001022 Amount: $210,271.46 07/19/200611:26 AM Payment Method: Check Init: JS Notation: 1227/VAIL DEVELOPMENT, LC Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 157,067.90 This Payment: $210,271.46 Total ALL Pmts: 157,067.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 210,271.46 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprinted on 10-31-2007 at 11:05:46 10/31/2007 Statement Statement Number: R060001628 Amount: $113,223.09 10/05/200604:36 PM Payment Method: Check Init: LC Notation: #1280/Vail Development LLC Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 157,067.90 This Payment: $113,223.09 Total ALL Pmts: 157,067.90 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 113,223.09 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprinted on 03-30-2007 at 12:22:14 03/30/2007 Statement Statement Number: Amount: $3.00 03/30/200712:19 PM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: LC Notation: credit card Michael Ellis Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 646,992.10 This Payment: $3.00 Total ALL Pmts: 646,992.10 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R070000386 Amount: $323,494.55 03/30/200712:19 PM Payment Method: Check Init: LC Notation: #1362/black Diamond resorts-Vail LLC Permit No: B06-0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 646,992.10 This Payment: $323,494.55 Total ALL Pmts: 646,992.10 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 145,572.55 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES -32,339.46 PF 00100003112300, PLAN CK - project GFP012 210,261.46 I I 44ATOB7VOVAIL AP PLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIGNED Project Building Permit Bob - VJJ& 970-479-2149 (Inspections) TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Separate Permits are required for electrical, plumbing, mechanical, etc.! 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 CONTRACTOR INFORMATION General Contractor: Town of Vail Reg. No.: Contact Person and Phone #'s: LAY9GIJ G~iV5 1~~1~0~1 333'x( opv~ CAAI : = 80! 598-'/z3 Email address: C q e1 y _ /ay AM - 6,P45h C001 Fax 10,0/) 16 .5st/-;!`j r`nMDI I=TF vet I IATInNS FnR RIM nING PFRMIT (I ahnr J& Materialsl BUILDING: $ ELECTRICAL: $ f OTHER: $ PLUMBING: $ MECHANICAL: $ TOTAL: $ For Parcel # Contact Eagle County Assessors Office at 970-328-8640 or visit www.eagle-county.com Parcel # Job Name: roHR S SO%IS ~E,oRT qT t/~IL Job Address: 0411- Rtgfb ✓hlLy Co _egal Description LFiling: Faqle 4 Cvv,n Subdivision: Owners Name: Address: oZ 1.4Gle 1 Man! /2ESORrS -d ~2L s/xr f 8D M141494 o 1o 5fe Phone: O/23 Architect/Desi ner: 11 Address: 1 HILL Ctt})9K AigqflTEcT5 11,15 i 2&01' MW VT 64 y3d~ 1 1 Phone: 1 &5o- 6/ 17- I En i ,er: Address: s M ~ o® svn~ s F~" acs iv Phone: - - 9y1 Detailed description of work:P#109D fZWMlr FvR 49AV1 4 V 6"kc.4v4 cA4 WORk INCI &E-S 141.1- MfMlpotc7OX 9'G'uIPM W s 465 ~~4&ornatl, MfUq ~»uflp I SrS M 7v A0,14 /7-4 AIr Work Class: New W Addition ( ) Remodel( ) Repair ( ) Demo ( ) Other ( ) ) Work Type: Interior ( ) ExteriorYQ Both( ) Does an EHU exist at this location: YesX) No( ) TSingle-family( ) Two-family( ) Multi-family( ) Commercial N Restaurant( ) Other( No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: No. of Accommodation Units in this building: No/Type of Fireplaces Existin : Gas Appliances Gas Los Wood/Pellet Wood Burning No/Type of Fireplaces Proposed: Gas Appliances Gas Los Wood/Pellet Wood Burning NOT ALLOWED ) Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes X) No( ) Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes 00 No( r L FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Type of Construction: Date Received: Occupancy Group: Accepted By: F:\cdev\FORMS\Permits\Building\building-permit. DOC Page 1 of 16 02/09/2005 (MkTc A S S O C I A T E S I N C. 8985 East Nichols Avenue, Suite 350 Centennial, Colorado 80112 www.atcassociates.com Phone 303.799.6100 Fax 303.799.3441 March 21, 2007 Mr. Douglas G. Hipskind Vail Development, LLC 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1480 Minneapolis, MN 55402 RE: Proposal for Groundwater Monitoring 13 Vail Road and 28 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado ATC Proposal Number: 35-07-0051-E I MAR n r'' 2007 1 TOWN r"e S WAUOVJI S Dear Mr. Hipskind: ATC Associates Inc. (ATC) is pleased to respond to your request for a proposal to perform groundwater monitoring services during the dewatering of the construction site at the above-referenced property. ATC understands that Layton Construction Company, Inc. will be performing the dewatering and excavation work at the site and that dewatering at the site is required for approximately nine months. ATC will oversee groundwater monitoring through the dewatering process to ensure regulatory compliance with applicable regulations. This proposal will include a brief summary of scope-of-work issues, followed by a fee proposal estimate. Scope of Work The purpose of groundwater monitoring is to monitor dewatering activities at the construction site. ATC project monitoring services will generally consist of maintaining communication with a client representative and the onsite contractor; assessing discharge water quality and dewatering progress; work to maintain compliance with the federal, state, and local discharge regulations as well as maintain the project schedule. Specific project activities are described below in detail. ATC anticipates a total of 13 sampling events throughout the course of the dewatering process. Initial sampling will be conducted at the outset of site dewatering and re-implemented weekly for the first month of discharge. Additional sampling will be conducted on a monthly basis until the conclusion of the dewatering process at the site. Other unanticipated sampling events may occur if onsite conditions warrant an increase in sampling frequency due to changing site conditions or if elevated concentrations of regulated hydrocarbon compounds are identified in the discharge. ATC will collect groundwater discharge samples to determine hydrocarbon concentrations at the initiation of and throughout the dewatering process. The samples will be analyzed by SPL, Inc. laboratories for Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Total Xylenes (BTEX) and Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) by EPA Method 8260 and Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) and Diesel Range Organics (DRO) by EPA Method 8015. • ATC will visually inspect the discharge at each sampling event for evidence of hydrocarbon impact (sheen and/or visible free product) and monitor for odor and/or vapor with a Photo-Ionization Detector (PID). Vail Development, LLC March 21, 2007 Groundwater Monitoring Proposal ATC will provide on-site monitoring and groundwater sampling on a regular basis to establish and confirm discharge compliance. ATC will record field activities and observations and provide a summary of field data in a summary report. ATC will respond to changes in site conditions if notified by appropriate onsite representatives by scheduling mid-term sampling activities. Field observations of such events by Vail Development, LLC or Layton Construction Company representatives shall be forwarded to ATC representatives for consultation and evaluation. If site conditions change significantly that warrant mid-term sampling, ATC will conduct additional sampling activities at the same rate as described for regularly scheduled sampling and analyses. Mid-term sampling activities will be conducted only upon authorization by Vail Development, LLC representatives. The cost for additional sampling activities is not included in this estimate. ATC will prepare a summary report which will include: a brief description of the dewatering activity; historic groundwater discharge sampling results over the course of the dewatering activities; any corrective action required at the site; and recommendations. Two copies of the final report will be provided within 30 days after receipt of the final laboratory data sheets. Fee Proposal for Groundwater Monitoring SERVICE UNITS RATE FEE Project Geologist/Scientist 104 Hours (8 hours/event) $75.00/hour $7,800.00 Project Management 13 Hours (1 hour/event) $115.00/hour $1,495.00 Project Adminstration 13 Hours (1 hour/event) $35.00/hour $455.00 Vehicle 13 events $85.00/event $1,105.00 Mileage 3,000 total miles (230 miles/event) $0.48.5/mile $1,455.00 Laboratory 13 - submittals (standard TAT) $180.00/event $2,340.00 Groundwater Monitoring Subtotal $14,650.00 This estimated total is based on the time and materials costs itemized above. If there are any additional charges necessary Vail Development, LLC will be immediately informed. No additional work will be performed without Vail Development, LLC prior approval. Authorization In order for ATC to proceed, please complete and sign the attached Proposal Acceptance Agreement included below indicating proper billing instructions and return the signed authorization copy to us. Please review the attached Terms and Conditions that are considered an integral part of this proposal. ATC Associates Inc. Page 2 Vail Development, LLC March 21, 2007 Groundwater Monitoring Proposal Schedule Site dewatering activities are tentatively scheduled to begin in the fourth week of March, 2007. ATC will coordinate appropriate field activities with onsite representatives to collect initial groundwater discharge samples for the site. Groundwater samples will be collected weekly for the first month of dewatering and then monthly thereafter, with the final sampling event occurring near the end of December, 2007. The project will be coordinated and managed out of ATC's office in Centennial, Colorado. We will coordinate field activities, prepare data summaries, and perform quality control review on laboratory analyses for the samples collected at the site. ATC will provide verbal updates upon receipt of final laboratory data, periodic written data summaries of field observations and sample results, and a final written report summarizing observations and results at the conclusion of the dewatering activities at the site. ATC is pleased to have this opportunity to work with Vail Development, LLC on this project. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact me at (303) 799-6100. Sincerely, ATC Associates Inc. Christopher A Woods Senior Project Manager Attachments: Terms and Conditions Proposal Acceptance and Agreement David Offermann Branch Manager ATC Associates Inc. Page 3 -Leonard Sandoval Development Project Coordinator Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: Phase I Staging Plan Dear Leonard: Layton CONSTRUCTING WITH INTEGRITY March 22, 2007 After your review of our proposed Phase I Staging Plan, your exceptions have been noted and are hereby agreed to. The second entrance point at the Northwest corner of our site is hereby amended to become part of the Phase II Staging Plan. Phase II will not commence until the second entrance has been approved by CDOT. Secondly, we hereby commit to identify the strength of the culverts at Spraddle Creek prior to installing construction trailers above them. This will ensure that no damage will be incurred by the culvert. It seems that the engineer who developed the staging plan also incorporated a covered walkway into the plan. This covered walkway will not be required or installed unless required by the Town of Vail. Thank you for your prompt attention in these matters. Sincerely, a Michael A. yolligan Sr. Project Manager Layton Construction Inc. 9 Layton Construction Company, Inc. 9090 South Sandy Parkway Sandy, Utah 84070 801.568.9090 Fax 5695450 http://www.layton-const.com -Leonard Sandoval Development Project Coordinator Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: Phase I Staging Plan Dear Leonard: Layton CONSTRUCTING WITH INTEGRITY March 22, 2007 After your review of our proposed Phase I Staging Plan, your exceptions have been noted and are hereby agreed to. The second entrance point at the Northwest corner of our site is hereby amended to become part of the Phase II Staging Plan. Phase II will not commence until the second entrance has been approved by CDOT. Secondly, we hereby commit to identify the strength of the culverts at Spraddle Creek prior to installing construction trailers above them. This will ensure that no damage will be incurred by the culvert. It seems that the engineer who developed the staging plan also incorporated a covered walkway into the plan. This covered walkway will not be required or installed unless required by the Town of Vail. Thank you for your prompt attention in these matters. Sincerely, Michael A. olligan Sr. Project Manager Layton Construction Inc. r Layton Construction Company, Inc. 9090 South Sandy Parkway Sandy, Utah 84070 801.568.9090 Fax 569.5450 http://www.layton-const.com -Leonard Sandoval Development Project Coordinator Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: Phase I Staging Plan Dear Leonard: Layton CONSTRUCTING WITH INTEGRITY March 22, 2007 After your review of our proposed Phase I Staging Plan, your exceptions have been noted and are hereby agreed to. The second entrance point at the Northwest comer of our site is hereby amended to become part of the Phase II Staging Plan. Phase II will not commence until the second entrance has been approved by CDOT. Secondly, we hereby commit to identify the strength of the culverts at Spraddle Creek prior to installing construction trailers above them. This will ensure that no damage will be incurred by the culvert. It seems that the engineer who developed the staging plan also incorporated a covered walkway into the plan. This covered walkway will not be required or installed unless required by the Town of Vail. Thank you for your prompt attention in these matters. Sincerely, Michael A. yo Sr. Project Manager Layton Construction Inc. I ~ti Layton Construction Company, Inc. 9090 South Sandy Parkway Sandy, Utah 84070 801.568.9090 Fax 569.5450 http://www.layton-const.com -Leonard Sandoval Development Project Coordinator Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: Phase I Staging Plan Dear Leonard: Layton CONSTRUCTING WITH INTEGRITY March 22, 2007 After your review of our proposed Phase I Staging Plan, your exceptions have been noted and are hereby agreed to. The second entrance point at the Northwest corner of our site is hereby amended to become part of the Phase II Staging Plan. Phase II will not commence until the second entrance has been approved by CDOT. Secondly, we hereby commit to identify the strength of the culverts at Spraddle Creek prior to installing construction trailers above them. This will ensure that no damage will be incurred by the culvert. It seems that the engineer who developed the staging plan also incorporated a covered walkway into the plan. This covered walkway will not be required or installed unless required by the Town of Vail. Thank you for your prompt attention in these matters. Sincerely, Michael A. olligan Sr. Project Manager Layton Construction Inc. r}~'',k k'Layton Construction Company, Inc. 9090 South Sandy Parkway Sandy, Utah 84070 801.568.9090 Fax 569.5450 http://www.layton-const.com pE -Leonard Sandoval Development Project Coordinator Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: Phase I Staging Plan Dear Leonard: Layton CONSTRUCTING WITH INTEGRITY March 22, 2007 After your review of our proposed Phase I Staging Plan, your exceptions have been noted and are hereby agreed to. The second entrance point at the Northwest corner of our site is hereby amended to become part of the Phase II Staging Plan. Phase II will not commence until the second entrance has been approved by CDOT. Secondly, we hereby commit to identify the strength of the culverts at Spraddle Creek prior to installing construction trailers above them. This will ensure that no damage will be incurred by the culvert. It seems that the engineer who developed the staging plan also incorporated a covered walkway into the plan. This covered walkway will not be required or installed unless required by the Town of Vail. Thank you for your prompt attention in these matters. Sincerely, Michael A. olligan Sr. Project Manager Layton Construction Inc. !+kxE Layton Construction Company, Inc. 9090 South Sandy Parkway Sandy, Utah 84070 801.568.9090 Fax 569.5450 http://www.layton-const.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Layton Layton Construction Co., Inc., 9090 South Sandy Parkway, Sandy, Utah 84070 (801) 568-9090 * Fax (801) 569-5450 TO: Building Department Town of Vail DATE: 3-/28/2006 JOB NO: 6030 ATTN: Charlie Davis RE: Four Seasons Resort Permit # B 06-0196 WE ARE SENDING YOU VIA: 0 Pick Up F-] Mail Fx Delivery THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: ❑ For Your Use ❑ For Review and Comment Approved as Submitted Approved as Noted F1 As Requested For Approval Returned for Corrections Rejected ❑ See Remarks REMARKS: Please call if more information is needed or if you have any question. Mark Reed 970-401-1777 COPY TO: Project Files SIGNED: P'7z Mark Reed, Project Superintendent 970-401-1777 lam. HOUSTON LABORATORY 8880 INTERCHANGE DRIVE HOUSTON, TX 77054 (713) 660-0901 Case Narrative for: ATC Associates, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Number: 07030507 Report To: ATC Associates, Inc. Chris Woods 8985 E. Nichols Ave. Suite 350 Centennial CO 80112- ph: (303) 799-6100 fax: Project Name: Vail Site: Centennial, CO Site Address: PO Number: State: Colorado State Cert. No.: Date Reported: 311612007 Per our discusion on March 13, 2007, Tentatively Identified Compounds were added to all of your project samples. Results are reported on a wet weight basis unless dry-weight correction is denoted in the units field on the analytical report mglkg-dry " or " uglkg-dry " Matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike duplicate (MSD) samples are chosen and tested at random from an analytical batch of "like" matrix to check for possible matrix effect. The MS and MSD will provide site specific matrix data only for those samples which are spiked by the laboratory. Since the MS and MSD are chosen at random from an analytical batch, the sample chosen for spike purposes may or may not have been a sample submitted in this sample delivery group. The validity of the analytical procedures for which data is reported in this analytical report is determined by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and the Method Blank (MB). The Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and the Method Blank (MB) are processed with the samples and the MS/MSD to ensure method criteria are achieved throughout the entire analytical process. Due to limited sample volume, a Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) was not extracted with Batch ID:65432 for the Diesel Range Organics analysis by Colorado Method CO_DRO. A Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and a Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD) were extracted with the analytical batch and serve as the batch quality control (QC). The LCS and LCSD recovered acceptably and precision criteria were met. Some of the percent recoveries and RPD's on the QC report for the MS/MSD may be different than the calculated recoveries and RPD's using the sample result and the MS/MSD results that appear on the report because, the actual raw result is used to perform the calculations for percent recovery and RPD. Any other exceptions associated with this report will be footnoted in the analytical result page(s) or the quality control summary page(s). Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments pertaining to this data report. Please reference the above Certificate of Analysis Number. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. The reported results are only representative of the samples submitted for testing. SPL, Inc. is pleased to be of service to you. We anticipate working with you in fulfilling all your current and future analytical needs. - D'Anna Stelly Project Manager Test results meet all requirements of NELAC, unless specified in the narrative. 3/16/2007 Date ; <-.0 C_ ATC Associates, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Number: 07030507 Report To: ATC Associates, Inc. Chris Woods 8985 E. Nichols Ave. Suite 350 Centennial CO 80112- ph: (303) 799-6100 fax: (303) 799-3441 Fax To: HOUSTON LABORATORY 8880 INTERCHANGE DRIVE HOUSTON, TX 77054 (713) 660-0901 Project Name: Vail Site: Centennial, CO Site Address: PO Number: State: Colorado State Cert. No.: Date Reported: 3116/2007 Client Sample ID Lab Sample ID Matrix Date Collected ! Date Received COC ID HOLD MW-24 07030507-01 Water 3/8/2007 3:45:00 PM 3/10/2007 10:00:00 AM ! 221041 J MW-13 07030507-02 Water 3/812007 3:50:00 PM 3/1012007 10:00:00 AM 221041 MW-19 07030507-03 Water 3/8/2007 4:00:00 PM 3/1012007 10:00:00 AM 221041 MW-20 07030507-04 Water 3/812007 4:10:00 PM 3/10/2007 10:00:00 AM 221041 D'Anna Stelly 'roject Manager Joel Grice Laboratory Director Ted Yen Quality Assurance Officer 3/16/2007 Date 3/1612007 2:40:47 PM z . HOUSTON LABORATORY 8880 INTERCHANGE DRIVE HOUSTON, TX 77054 (713) 660-0901 Client Sample ID MW-24 Collected: 03/08/2007 15:45 SPL Sample ID: 07030507-01 Site: Centennial, CO Analyses/Method Result QUAL MDL Rep.Limit Dil. Factor Date Analyzed Analyst Seq. # DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS MCL CO DRO Units: m~IL Diesel Range Organics, C11- C28 0.29 J 0.041 1 1 03/12/07 11:40 NW 3716478 - - - - - Surr: n-Pentacosane 105 0 % 21-130 1 03112/07 11:40 NW 3716478 Prep Method Prep Date Prep Initials ;Prep Factor SW3510C !03/10/200714:24 1-L '1.00 D'Anna Stelly Project Manager Qualifiers: ND/U - Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit >MCL - Result Over Maximum Contamination Limit(MCL) J - Estimated Value between MDL and POL D - Surrogate Recovery Unreportable due to Dilution MI - Matrix Interference - Surrogate Recovery Outside Advisable QC Limits TNTC - Too numerous to count E - Concentrations exceeding Calibration range of Instrument B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank above Rep.Limit 3/16/2007 2:40:56 PM x ~r HOUSTON LABORATORY 00-0 O 8880 INTERCHANGE DRIVE ® HOUSTON, TX 77054 (713) 660-0901 Client Sample ID MW-24 Collected: 03/08/2007 15:45 SPL Sample ID: 07030507-01 Site: Centennial, CO Analyses/Method Result QUAL MDL Rep.Limit Dil. Factor Date Analyzed Analyst Seq. # VOLATILE ORGANICS BY METHOD 82608 MCL SW8260B Units: ug/L Benzene ND 0.053 1 1 03/12/07 7:33 D R 3716123 Ethylbenzene 0.086 J 0.056 5 1 03/12/07 7:33 D R 3716123 Gasoline Range Organics 250 5.7 50 1 03/12/07 7:33 D_R 3716123 Toluene ND 0.092 5 1 03/12/07 7:33 D R 3716123 m,p-Xylene ND 0.08 5 1 03/12/07 7:33 D R 3716123 o Xylene ND 0.046 5 1 03/12/07 7:33 D_R 3716123 Xylenes,Total ND 0.046 5 1 03/12/07 7:33 D -R 3716123 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 88.4 0 % 71-140 1 03/12/07 7:33 D R 3716123 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101 0 % 70-130 1 03112107 7:33 D R 3716123 Surr: Toluene-d8 102 0 % 61-121 1 03/12/07 7:33 D-R 3716123 D'Anna Stelly Project Manager Qualifiers: ND/U - Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit >MCL - Result Over Maximum Contamination Limit(MCL) J - Estimated Value between MDL and PQL D - Surrogate Recovery Unreportable due to Dilution MI - Matrix Interference - Surrogate Recovery Outside Advisable QC Limits TNTC - Too numerous to count E - Concentrations exceeding Calibration range of Instrument B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank above Rep.Limit 3116/2007 2:40:56 PM ~~xm_ ~ft . tr. ~ - Data File U:\VOA1\070310A\107C0530.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 7:33 Sample 07030507-01A Misc SAMP;8260W_GC MS Integration Params_ RTEINT.P Quant Time: Mar 12 09:00:11 2007 Vial: 41 Operator: DR Inst : MSDVOAI Multiplr: 1.00 Results File: 1W030707.RES SubList: spl_lims.sub Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M (RTE Integrator) Title 8260 W Last Update Thu Mar 08 14:05:25 2007 Response via Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth 1W030707.M Compound R.T. QIon Response OnCol - ug/L Dev{Min) Inte rnal Standards - 1) Pentafluorobenzene 3.31 168 475236 50.00 0.00 36) 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.89 114 685648 50.00 0.00 55) Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 82 350591 50.00 0.00 78) 1,4-Dichlorob.enzene-d4 6.65 152 289019 50.00 0.00 System Monitoring Compounds 29) 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 3.27 65 302802 44.21 44.21 0.00 Spiked Amount 50.000 Recovery = 88.42% 47) Toluene-d8 4.89 98 824269 51.10 51.10 0.00 Spiked Amount 50.000 Recovery = 102.20% 65) 4-Bromofluorobenzene 6.10 95 326485 50.61 50.61 0.00 Spiked Amount 50.000 Recovery = 101.22% Target Compounds Qvalue 2) GAS (TPH) 2.00 TIC 9631310m 248.02 248.02 34) Benzene 3.70 78 1520 N.D. N.D. 48) Toluene 4.93 91 1641 N.D. N.D. 57) Ethylbenzene 5.68 91 1566 0.09 0.09 83 58) m,p-Xylene 5.78 91 1637 Below Cal Below Cal 92 62) o-Xylene 5.94 91 713 Below Cal Below Cal # 38 Target Compounds not in Sublist Qvalue 3) Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.00 85 0 N.D. N.D. 4) Chloromethane 0.98 50 1038 0.29 0.29 96 5) Vinyl Chloride 0.00 62 0 N.D. N.D. 6) Bromomethane 1.17 96 505 0.08 0.08 71 7) Chloroethane 1.23 64 204 0.10 0.10 # 1 8) Trichlorofluoromethane 1.42 101 222 0.10 0.10 90 9) Acrolein 1.42 56 354 0.32 0.32 # 18 10) Acetone 1.48 58 44232 23.82 23.82 68 11) 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.65 96 ill 0.09 0.09 # 18 12) t-Butyl Alcohol 1.66 59 3118 0.89 0.89 # 89 13) Acrylonitrile 0.00 53 0 N.D. N.D. 14) Methylene Chloride 1.71 49 368 Below Cal Below Cal # 55 15) Allyl Chloride 1.81 76 1004 0.71 0.71 # 61 16) Carbon disulfide 1.81 76 1005 N.D. N.D. 17) Allyl alcohol 0.00 57 0 N.D. N.D. 18) trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.05 61 422 0.10 0.10 # 63 19) Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.14 73 1296 0.10 0.10 90 20) 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.00 63 0 N.D. N.D. 21) Vinyl Acetate 2.30 43 283 0.38 0.38 # 77 22) 2-Butanone 2.52 72 235754 141.11 141.11 83 23) Diisopropyl Ether 2.53 45 11006 0.44 0.44 # 61 24) cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.60 61 387 N.D. N.D. 25) Bromochloromethane 2.74 49 269 0.09 0.09 # 35 26) Chloroform 2.78 83 2371 0.19 4.19 97 27) 2,2-Dichloropropane 2.83 77 215 0.16 0.16 # 6 28) Ethyl tert-butyl ether 2.88 59 470 0.12 0.12 # 1 30) 1,2-Dichloroethane 3.34 62 1098 0.22 0.22 95 31) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.39 97 284 0.17 0.17 # 1 32) 1,1-Dichloropropene 3.56 75 337 0.10 0.10 # 46 = qualifier out of range (m) = manual integration 107C0530.D 1W030707.M Mon Mar 12 09:00:20 2007 Page -.,.---N., --\-'-VJ,V.L VLCL 1: Y1 Acq On 12 Mar 2007 7:33 Operator: DR Sample 0703OS07-01A Inst : MSDVOAI Misc SAMP;8260W_GC Multiplr: 1.00 MS Integration Params_ RTEINT.P Quant Time: Mar 12 09:00:11 2007 Results File: 1W.030707.RES SubList: spl_lims.sub Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M (RTE Integrator) Title 8260 W Last Update Thu Mar 08 14:05:25 2007 Response via Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth 1W030707.M Compound R.T. QIon Response - OnCol ug/L Qvalue 33) Carbon tetrachloride 0.00 117 0 N.D. N.D. 35) tert-Amyl methyl ether 3.85 73 221 0.16 0.16 # 1 37) Dibromomethane 0.00 174 0 N.D. N.D. 38) 1,2-dichloropropane 4.09 63 368 0.13 0.13 # 42 39) Trichloroethene 4.12 130 275 N.D. N.D. 40) Bromodichloromethane 4.14 83 484 0.23 0.23 # 86 41) 1,4-Dioxane 4.26 88 103 1.25 1.25 # 36 42) 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 0.00 63 0 N.D. N.D. 43) cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 4.54 75 233 0.28 0.28 # 1 44) 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 4.60 43 171 0.28 0.28 # 45 45) trans-1,3-dichloropropene 4.77 75 155 0.37 0.37 # 28 46) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.83 83 207 0.10 0.10 # 6 49) 1,3-Dichloropropane 4.96 76 611 0.18 0.18 84 50) 2-Hexanone 5.05 43 446 0.75 0.75 # 28 51) Dibromochloromethane 0.00 129 0 N.D. N.D. 52) 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.19 107 111 0.15 0.15 93 53) Tetrachloroethene 5.27 166 574 0.11 0.11 80 54) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.54 131 153 0.25 0.25 # 1 56) Chlorobenzene 5.58 112 726 N.D. N.D. 59) Bromoform 0.00 173 0 N.D. N.D. 60) Styrene 5.93 104 346 0.16 0.16 # 32 61) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.90 83 2719 0.37 0.37 # 27 63) 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 6.00 75 116 N.D. N.D. 64) Isopropylbenzene 6.09 105 880 N.D. N.D. 66) Bromobenz.ene 6.18 77 393 Below Cal Below Cal # 43 67) n-Propylbenzene 6.29 91 167 0.11 0.11 # 54 68) 2-Chlorotoluene 6.31 91 782 0.•08 0.08 70 69) 4-Chlorotoluene 6.36 126 128 Below Cal Below Cal # 45 70) 3-Ethyltoluene 6.36 105 1164 N.D. N.D. 71) 4-Ethyltoluene 6.36 105 1164 N.D. N.D. 72) 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 6.42 105 397 0.11 0.11 # 29 73) 2-Ethyltoluene 6.47 105 618 N.D. N.D. 74) tert-Butylbenzene 6.52 119 377 N.D. N.D. 75) 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 6.57 105 804 0.10 0.10 83 76) sec-Butylbenzene 6.61 105 645 N.D. N.D. 77) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 6.64 146 230 Below Cal Below Cal # 1 79) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6.66 146 380 N.D. N.D. 80) p-Isopropyltoluene 6.69 119 425 0.11 0.11 # 50 81) 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 6.74 105 707 N.D. N.D. 82) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 6.80 146 213 N.D. N.D. 83) n-Butylbenzene 6.86 91 608 0.14 0.14 # 50 84) DBCP 0.00 157 0 N.D. N.D. 85) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.58 180 280 0.18 0.18 # 84 86) Naphthalene 7.70 128 631 0.25 0.25 # 68 87) Hexachlorobutadiene 0.00 225 0 N.D. N.D. 88) 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.00 180 0 N.D. N.D. = qualifier out of range (m) = manual integration 107C0530.D 1W030707.M Mon Mar 12 09:00:21 2007 Page 2 H O O D Q O O 1 N W U) , Cl) A £ in U i la ~4 1 O r-1 t rl Q U ' f0 •ri H. ~4 4J 4J W f0 r-1 QI q O H ) 1 ) • a M 1M N H i 0 F il`~iglP, O O U) ' N l~ kO E 1 o N ft Sa Ln C f4 it O f(J 2: M C14 CL4 ' O N r- ~ )oU) O ,-4 1 01 i v ~ o U O 0 O r-I D 0 f f1 U H , V E U) C) am i U N -.-I c!) Q !bP-auezu9goigya!o-4'L S•euazuego,onuowag-q I'SP-8uezuegwo!40 S'BP•suenlol euele414deN euezuagao!tpul-b'Z' L euazuegv4ng-u 9uenpWcudos!-0 auezueciNliP~u4~1-4'Z' L euezuegyl41ewu1-S'E' L amqwbQ:a d•eue4ieo,0143eAe1• "ft 0•euezuegj4t43 0 to r) O o u, r; aua41aw0143e,lel 6ue4160LL1tL@0-Z' L euouexeH-Z L wdwoo!4o 10 eueed G Uj B u 7 L ie0waaolip!P-£'G-SUte~j - 8u0uelued- -IAtyja -y auetlwdwg4 o-E L!o O et e u eemo-p' LL au etuo,p 1 u O O ~W418 eW wV-Y l euedoidwopp}Q-L'L euey~aoaoS :-),j,-l th I'euezuegaonu!o-V L ,a 1 I n -Va eUS, o, aue41 r ,84130 tto 00 N N eieleOV NuIA N ,a4la!14n4-Ua11A4LaV4 N eue>newo!l Rid1M su9 - 0 0 N O epu0140IAIM fr 0•eus~lA~T~p~$ o euo eo eueylawwoglo O N N L4 1L. Je 4 9 d'eue41ewa0140 _ O O L' ~ l 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 O O O O O 0 O o 0 0 0 O O o O o 0 o 0 0 0 0 O O O O A r O 0 0 o 0 U') o o C 0 0 0 0 0 0 to o to o 0 0 to o O 0 0 o to o 0 0 0 O o O o O Lf) C) U) 4) r- 0 co (p to In v Co Cl) N N E M O 3 °u ram:<z T - va~a i-itc . U. \vvr-i1\V/VJ1YJrH\LU/%.V7J7.i1 Vial: 4b Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator: DR Sample 07030507-02A Inst : MSDVOAI Misc SAMP;8260_W_GC Multiplr: 1.00 MS Integration Params: RTEINT.P Quant Time: Mar 12 10:43:11 2007 Results File: 1W030707.RES SubList: spl_lims.sub Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M (RTE Integrator) Title 8260 W Last Update Thu Mar 08 14:05:25 2007 Response via Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth 1W030707.M Compound R.T. QIon Response OnCol ug/L Dev(Min) Internal Standards 1) Pentafluorobenzene 3.32 168 481654 50.00 0.00 36) 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 114 720074 50.00 0.00 55) Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 82 350275 50.00 0.00 78) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 152 298877 50.00 0.00 System Monitoring Compounds 29) 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 3.27 65 359661 51.00 51.00 0.00 Sp iked Amount 50.000 Recovery = 102.00% 47) Toluene-d8 4.89 98 808228 47.95 47.95 0.00 Sp iked Amount 50.000 Recovery = 95.90% 65) 4-Bromofluorobenzene 6.10 95 329697 51.08 51.08 0.00 Sp iked Amount 50.000 Recovery = 102.16% Target Compounds Qvalue 2) GAS (TPH) 2.00 TIC 129573589m 3989.19 3989.19 34) Benzene 3.70 78 1068 N.D. N.D. 48) Toluene 4.92 91 1408 N.D. N.D. 57) Ethylbenzene 5.68 91 9842 0.42 0.42 87 58) m,p-Xylene 5.77 91 30973 1.54 1.54 97 62) o-Xylene 5.94 91 3549 0.13 0.13 # 79 Target Compounds not in Sublist Qvalue 3) Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.00 85 0 N.D. N.D. 4) Chloromethane 0.98 50 932 0.25 0.25 85 5) Vinyl Chloride 1.06 62 142 N.D. N.D. 6) Bromomethane 1.17 96 225 Below Cal Below Cal # 1 7) Chloroethane 1.22 64 830 0.42 0.42 # 70 8) Trichlorofluoromethane 0.00 101 0 N.D. N.D. 9) Acrolein 1.43 56 350 0.31 0.31 # 68 10) Acetone 1.48 58 65099 34.40 34.40 80 11) 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.00 96 0 N.D. N.D. 12) t-Butyl Alcohol 1.67 59 2558 0.70 0.70 # 66 13) Acrylonitrile 1.69 53 122 0.27 0.27 # 32 14) Methylene Chloride 1.71 49 469 Below Cal Below Cal 72 15) Allyl Chloride 1.80 76 918 0.67 0.-67 # 42 16) Carbon disulfide 1.80 76 977 N.D. N.D. 17) Allyl alcohol 1.79 57 263 8.51 8.51 # 1 18) trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.06 61 120 N.D. N.D. 19) Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.13 73 1449 0.11 0.11 85 20) 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.27 63 243 Below Cal Below Cal # 45 21) Vinyl Acetate 2.34 43 110 0.37 0.37 # 1 22) 2-Butanone 2.53 72 119684 68.26 68.26 95 23) Diisopropyl Ether 2.53 45 5622 0.27 0.27 88 24) cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.61 61 209 N.D. N.D. 25) Bromochloromethane 2.70 49 124 N.D. N.D. 26) Chloroform 2.78 83 433 N.D. N.D. 27) 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.00 77 0 N.D. N.D. 28) Ethyl tent-butyl ether 2.89 59 326 0.11 0.11 # 47 30) 1,2-Dichloroethane 3.33 62 3888 0.46 0.46 # 44 31) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.38 97 159 0.16 0.16 # 45 32) 1,1-Dichloropropene 3.55 75 - 428 0.11 0.11 # 36 = qualifier out of range (m) - = manual integration 107C0535.D 1W030707.M Mon Mar 12 10:43:20 2007 Page 1 T e3<<~ = Ldl.d r11C U:\VUL-i1\U/U.s1UA\IV /C:U5S5.L) Vial: 4b Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator: DR Sample 07030507-02A Inst : MSDVOAI Misc SAMP;8260 W GC Multiplr: 1.0.0 MS Integration Params RTEINT.P Quant Time: Mar 12 10:43:11 2007 Results File: 1W030707.RES SubList: spl_lims.sub Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M (RTE Integrator) Title 8260 W Last Update Thu Mar 08 14:05:25 2007 Response via Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth 1W030707.M Compound R.T. QIon Response OnCol ug/L Qvalue 33) Carbon tetrachloride 3.66 117 176 0.25 0.25 # 12 35) tert-Amyl methyl ether 3.84 73 184 0.16 0.16 # 1 37) Dibromomethane 0.00 174 0 N.D. N.D. 38) 1,2-dichloropropane 4.08 63 279 0.12 0.12 # 31 39) Trichloroethene 4.13 130 211 Below Cal Below Cal # 29 40) Bromodichloromethane 4.14 83 2902 0.56 0.56 # 33 41) 1,4-Dioxane 0.00 88 0 N.D. N.D. 42) 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 4.50 63 425 4.76 4.76 # 1 43) cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 4.52 75 150 0.27 0.27 # 1 44) 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 4.60 43 21838 1.50 1.50 # 43 45) trans-1,3-dichloropropene 4.79 75 222 0.38 0.38 # 1 46) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.84 83 6505 1.43 1.43 # 6 49) 1,3-Dichloropropane 4.96 76 238 0.14 0.14 # 1 50) 2-Hexanone 5.07 43 2056 0.85 0.85 76 51) Dibromochloromethane 0.00 129 0 N.D. N.D. 52) 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.17 107 221 0.16 0.16 # 1 53) Tetrachloroethene 5.27 166 317 N.D. N.D. 54) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.52 131 264 0.28 0.28 # 1 56) Chlorobenzene 5.62 112 1718 0.12 0.12 76 59) Bromoform 0.00 173 0 N.D. N.D. 60) Styrene 5.91 104 294 0.15 0.15 # 13 61) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.90 83 7834 1.07 1.07 # 17 63) 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 6.00 75 271 N.D. N.D. 64) Isopropylbenzene 6.10 105 33285 1.68 1.68 # 90 66) Bromobenzene 6.18 77 368 Below Cal Below Cal # 51 67) n-Propylbenzene 6.28 91 387066 14.93 14.93 98 68) 2-Chlorotoluene 6.28 91 381974 26.54 26.54 # 38 69) 4-Chlorotoluene 6.35 126 410 N.D. N.D. 70) 3-Ethyltoluene 6.35 105 427232 24.01 24.01 99 71) 4-Ethyltoluene 6.35 105 427232 24.01 24.01 99 72) 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 6.41 105 553914 31.35 31.35 97 73) 2-Ethyltoluene 6.46 105 239996 11.29 11.29 98 74) tert-Butylbenzene 6.52 119 1191 0.09 0.09 # 31 75) 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 6.57 105 1165371 64.71 64.71 98 76) sec-Butylbenzene 6.61 105 213674 10.16 10.16 # 48 77) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 6.63 146 316 Below Cal Below Cal # 1 79) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6.65 146 697 0.08 0.08 # 1 80) p-Isopropyltoluene 6.69 119 113710 6.62 6.62 97 81) 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 6.74 105 84465 4.38 4.38 97 82) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 6.80 146 320 N.D. N.D. 83) n-Butylbenzene 6.86 91 1291972 77.98 77.98 # 41 84) DBCP 6.98 157 787 0.71 0.71 # 1 85) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.57 180 816 0.26 0.26 # 83 86) Naphthalene 7.67 128 49102 1.96 1.96 # 73 87) Hexachlorobutadiene 0.00 225 0 N.D. N.D. 88) 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 7.78 180 1142 0.21 0.21 # 29 = qualifier out of range (m) = manual integration 107C0535.D 1W030707.M Mon Mar 12 10:43:21 2007 Page 2 Q 0 ai r` N 01 oe o o ` P4 r; auaa j u ~ L uen a ll l S 47 1'bP-euezuegoxg4ol0-b'L eu euezueglAylawNI-b'Z'L .I ozuN n8-oa 0 auezuagi ng-Uel euezuegi)I41ewlj ouen1o11~U13-Z a ui S'euezw&gatmglbdm o O d'a..L*"- aue lAX-d'w uezuaqu(y13 ua ao j g 1'gp-ouozuagaoly iUUc oe~lel-Z' L' L L O L6 > ui M teowoiglUZ'L p euouexeH-Z U ol S'8P-auen dololyolQ-E'L lol i 3•i S4 0 ~ S O r-i aue 4 1 t1 04 7L (o •ri euoueluad-Z-1 Y, p w W ri r-~ CL OHS OUNNWI R p- e O 0 l'euezuegoronul 94 J - M41-1 V-Uel 7 a GWol4PP4e1 uogleo euedadaolyp4.Q-L' L C) L V m 0 0 ie41e 1,4nq-yal K413 1 1 ~ h 1 Ja413 0 ~ O a N N ) ri eteleOV IAAA z r') O H jetpa Wnq-vel K4)aW N 1 r I U W H'(Hdl) SVO 0 o rn N -11 ~ h N~ a bVIV p - p p ( 104%%P" H o o m N h O N ~ O N tO 4 pI~1~ eUUlalw~V r i ~-i Ul C ~1 td O ro Sa M QW 04 oueyleaol40 (d ' O N h O r-i o Cl) O d'eue4lewa0140 •H O ?4 g i i a a) a) V O O + h O r 0 O O 0 + 0 O O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 ' h o O ri C CD c N 4) d) Q) O CD o C) 0 0 0 C) 0 C) 0 0 0 0 C) C> C) 0 n 1 r, H Cl, U 0 0 O CD O 0 0 O N O ul u 0) 0 N M ro •rii C/] S U Q - IF:4 CO XX H - - - . \ Vv \V / VJ1.Vtt\1V /l V~3'4.L Viai: 45 Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:08 Operator: DR Sample 07030507-03A Ins t : MSDVOA1 Misc SAMP;8260 W_GC Mul tiplr: 5.00 _ MS Integration Params RTEINT.P Quant Time: Mar 12 10:42:48 2007 Results File: 1W030707.RES Sublist: spl _lims.sub Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707 .M (RTE Integrator) Title 8260 W Last Update Thu Mar 08 14:05:25 2007 Response via Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth 1W030707.M Compound R.T. QIon Response OnCo ug/L Dev(Min) Internal Standards 1) Pentafluorobenzene 3.32 168 522701 50 00 0 00 36) 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 114 771206 . 50 00 . 0 00 55) Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 82 378901 . 50 00 . 0 00 78) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 152 311946 . 50.00 . 0.00 System Monitoring Compounds 29) 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 3.27 65 355679 46.91 234 55 0 00 Spiked Amount 250.000 Recovery . = 93.82 % . 47) Toluene-d8 4.89 98 872855 48.32 241 60 0 00 Spiked Amount 250.000 Recovery . = 96.64 % . 65) 4-Bromofluorobenzene 6.10 95 346451 49.81 249 05 0 00 Spiked Amount 250.000 Recovery . = 99.62 . Target Compounds Qvalue 2) GAS (TPH) 2.00 TIC 4 1163478m 1070.60 5353.01 34) Benzene 3.70 78 1876 0.03 0.14 81 48) Toluene 4.93 91 1578 N.D. N.D. 57) Ethylbenzene 5.68 91 1911 0.09 0.47 91 58) m,p-Xylene 5.77 91 1755 Below Cal Below Cal # 84 62) o-Xylene 5.94 91 874 Below Cal Below Cal 79 Target Compounds not in Sublist Qvalue 3) Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.00 85 0 N.D. N.D. 4) Chloromethane 1.03 50 340 0.04 0.19 97 5) Vinyl Chloride 1.07 62 135 Below Cal Below Cal # 1 6) Bromomethane 1.17 96 325 Below Cal Below Cal 57 7) Chloroethane 1.22 64 343 0.16 0.78 # 1 8) Trichlorofluoromethane 0.00 101 0 N.D. N.D. 9) Acrolein 1.43 56 1152 1.27 6.37 # 83 10) Acetone 1.47 58 417618 202.19 1010.97 75 11) 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.00 96 0 N.D. N.D. 12) t-Butyl Alcohol 1.67 59 9677 2.75 13.77 # 49 13) Acrylonitrile 1.68 53 275 0.30 1.49 # •6 14) Methylene Chloride 1.71 49 7802 0.08 0.40 92 15) Allyl Chloride 1.80 76 1478 0.86 4.30 # 58 16) Carbon disulfide 1.80 76 1478 0.09 0.47 99 17) Allyl alcohol 1.80 57 1473 12.90 64.48 82 18) trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.05 61 135 0.07 0.37 # 40 19) Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.13 73 588 0.06 0.32 92 20) 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.21 63 156 Below Cal Below Cal # 45 21) Vinyl Acetate 2.34 43 351 0.38 1.90 # 19 22) 2-Butanone 2.53 72 1119607 Below Cal Below Cal 80 23) Diisopropyl Ether 2.53 45 49552 1.49 7.46 # 61 24) cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.61 61 441 0.05 0.27 73 25) Bromochloromethane 2.71 49 417 0.11 0.54 # 17 26) Chloroform 2.78 83 1079 0.07 0.35 85 27) 2,2-Dichloropropane 2.84 77 120 0.15 0.73 # 1 28) Ethyl tert-butyl ether 2.88 59 190 0.11 0.53 # 43 30) 1,2-Dichloroethane 3.31 62 2610 0.33 1.66 # 44 31) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.40 97 163 0.16 0.78 # 1 32) 1,1-Dichloropropene 3.54 75 134 0.08 0.38 # 1 = qualifier out of range (m) = manual integration 107C0534.D 1W030707.M Mon Mar 12 10:42:5 9 2007 Page 1 =ate uaua rift U: \vv[-.l \U /USlUR\lU /(.;U5.34.L) Acq On 12 Mar 2007 1U:08 Sample 07030507-03A Misc SAMP;8260W_GC MS Integration Params_ RTEINT.P Quant Time: Mar 12 10:42:48 2007 Vial: 45 Operator: DR Inst : MSDVOAI Multiplr: 5.00 Results File: 1W030707.RES SubList: spl lims.sub Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M (RTE Integrator) Title 8260 W Last Update Thu Mar 08 14:05:25 2007 Response via Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth 1W030707.M Compound R.T. QIon Response OnCol ug/L Qvalue 33) Carbon tetrachloride 3.66 117 162 0.25 1.25 # 83 35) tert-Amyl methyl ether 3.85 73 105 0.16 0.79 # 1 37) Dibromomethane 4.06 174 152 0.15 0.75 # 40 38) 1,2-dichloropropane 4.09 63 512 0.15 0.74 # 1 39) Trichloroethene 4.12 130 278 Below Cal Below Cal 70 40) Bromodichloromethane 4.14 83 453 0.22 1.10 # 82 41) 1,4-Dioxane 0.00 88 0 N.D. N.D. 42) 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 0.00 63 0 N.D. N.D. 43) cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 4.53 75 223 0.28 1.40 # 9 44) 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 4.64 43 1140 0.33 1.65 94 45) trans-1,3-dichloropropene 0.00 75 0 N.D. N.D. 46) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.84 83 258 0.11 0.53 65 49) 1,3-Dichloropropane 4.95 76 607 0.17 0.85 # 30 50) 2-Hexanone 5.06 43 133 0.72 3.61 # 28 51) Dibromochloromethane 5.07 129 123 0.30 1.49 # 1 52) 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.19 107 231 0.16 0.82 # 1 53) Tetrachloroethene 5.27 166 630 0.11 0.54 81 54) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.52 131 272 0.27 1.37 # 1 56) Chlorobenzene 5.58 112 742 0.04 0.21 # 1 59) Bromoform 0.00 173 0 N.D. N.D. 60) Styrene 5.92 104 222 0.15 0.73 # 1 61) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.90 83 21017 2.67 13.34 # 18 63) 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 6.00 75 221 0.04 0.18 # 44 64) Isopropylbenzene 6.10 105 1516 0.05 0.27 # 1 66) Bromobenzene 6.18 77 572 N.D. N.D. 67) n-Propylbenzene 6.29 91 2656 0.20 0.98 87 68) 2-Chlorotoluene 6.32 91 441 0.06 0.29 # 63 69) 4-Chlorotoluene 6.36 126 160 N.D. N.D. 70) 3-Ethyltoluene 6.35 105 1153 0.03 0.13 # 79 71) 4-Ethyltoluene 6.35 105 1153 0.03 0.13 # 79 72) 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 6.41 105 3796 0.29 1.43 95 73) 2-Ethyltoluene 6.46 105 1971 0.13 0.66 # 92 74) tert-Butylbenzene 6.52 119 341 0.03 0.15 # 85 75) 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 6.57 105 8464 0.47 2.34 93 76) sec-Butylbenzene 6.61 105 2253 0.10 0.52 # 72 77) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 6.63 146 329 Below Cal Below Cal # 25 79) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6.66 146 677 0.08 0.38 # 1 80) p-Isopropyltoluene 6.69 119 1291 0.16 0.79 89 81) 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 6.74 105 1757 0.13 0.63 # 85 82) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 6.80 146 260 0.04 0.18 # 37 83) n-Butylbenzene 6.86 91 7452 0.52 2.59 # 30 84) DBCP 0.00 157 0 N.D. N.D. 85) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.57 180 361 0.19 0.94 # 1 86) Naphthalene 7.68 128 1850 0.29 1.43 # 39 87) Hexachlorobutadiene 7.71 225 104 N.D. N.D. 88) 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 7.77 180 268 0.08 0.39 # 1 = qualifier out of range W = manual integration 107C0534.D 1W030707.M Mon Mar 12 10:43:00 2007 Page 2 :;6 0 0 ai 0 co 0 0 au eueletp4dery suezuegaoltpul-V'Z' L I'gP- U-uegaol4o!0-4' L ouszueqAwfv4--f suezuogl6doad-u tN M lU Q1 O ~ o a O to m S'euezuegomngowae-4 O O d'sue4leoJgyoegel-Z'Z' L' l sueJtq to 3'9uezue(Nt413 ->a> L'gp-euezuegoiol43 0 eue4leoiolyoaRal- L L U? O u) >o 0 ' Q o sue4WwOltpetlel eue4laotuol4!0-Z' L 1 R r A u1 0 6u84PUMAM POWO 8 0 ' 0 0 L g'gp-suen!ol euadoidaol4old C eu-8 ol4oul-Z'L L uj O H 1J (1, (U H U suouelued-Z-Nl4KW-6 ?4 JJ 4J ~ suedoWag4o!o-£'L-s!D O rn ri N d: ^ W rl _ OHE o !'euezuegaonN!o-4' L - - 4 ePW14oeJlsl uogteo eue4leoJg4op1-L' L• L c e) eue4lewa0143owae j Je413IRdoidoollo 0 O a N N > Co elel-V IRWA l0 F N - 2 0 O H 1 H U W -a» H'(Hdl) SVJ O M 1 U F, N 14' f r- M o epWp Rgpg O .00 oI H O dJ 'o N L~ ~D t N I O N (lS euoleoV H ~4 Ln W 34 i IU O • ` t1 4 121 C14 eue4leag43 (d o N (D C rl o M u) O 0 1 ~ U1 Q)O `3 O O O O O T O O O O O O 0 0 O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 + O l 0 mO 0 O 0 O 0 00 0 00 0 0 O 0 C) O 0 00 0 0 O 0 C) O C) O 00 00 0 0 00 O r U H 0 0 0 lA 0 O 0 to 0 O o to 0 0 0 to 0 0 O to 0 O 0 0 0 V) O O O O' E Ul Co O In O t0 cD to U.) V V Cl) M N N r E M U M -H U) ' D Q H 3 IQ; U)~ u6L6 r11e : U: N VQR1 \U /U.s1UA\1U /tivSSS .11 Vial: 44 Acq On 12 Mar 2007 8:44 Operator: DR Sample 07030507-04A Inst : MSDVOAI Misc SAMP;8260_W_GC Multiplr: 5.00 MS Integration Params: RTEINT.P Quant Time: Mar 12 09:57:59 2007 Results File: 1W030707.RES SubList: spl lims.sub Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M (RTE Integrator) Title 8260 W Last Update Thu Mar 08 14:05:25 2007 Response via Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth 1W030707.M Compound R.T. QIon Response OnCol ug/L Dev(Min) Internal Standards 1) Pentafluorobenzene 3.32 168 412904 50.00 0.00 36) 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 114 561776 50.00 0.00 55) Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 82 312888 50.00 0.00 78) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 152 276790 50.00 0.00 System Monitoring Compounds 29) 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 3.27 65 253620 42.77 213.85 0.00 Sp iked Amount 250.000 Recovery = 85.54% 47) Toluene-d8 4.89 98 719157 54.18 270.92 0.00 Sp iked Amount 250.000 Recovery = 108.37% 65) 4-Bromofluorobenzene 6.10 95 303914 52.51 262.54 0.00 Sp iked Amount 250.000 Recovery = 105.02% Targ et Compounds Qvalue 2) GAS (TPH) 2.00 TIC 44005690m 1472.90 7364.48 34) Benzene 3.70 78 1167 N.D. N.D. 48) Toluene 4.92 91' 1411 0.03 0.14 89 57) Ethylbenzene 5.68 91 2109 0.12 0.59 74 58) m,p-Xylene 5.78 91 2776 0.07 0.36 86 62) o-Xylene 5.95 91 1719 0.05 0.25 71 Target Compounds not in Sublist Qvalue 3) Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.00 85 0 N.D. N.D. 4) Chloromethane 0.98 50 574 0.16 0.79 99 5) Vinyl Chloride 0.00 62 0 N.D. N.D. 6) Bromomethane 1.21 96 120 Below Cal Below Cal 85 7) Chloroethane 1.22 64 866 0.51 2.54 # 59 8) Trichlorofluoromethane 1.42 101 214 0.10 0.49 # 18 9) Acrolein 1.43 56 1218 1.76 8.81 # 96 10) Acetone 1.47 58 451775 277.39 1386.97 75 11) 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.00 96 0 N.D. N.D. 12) t-Butyl Alcohol 1.67 59 9540 3.47 17.34 # 79 13) Acrylonitrile 1.65 53 139 0.28 1.39 # 41 14) Methylene Chloride 1.71 49 6484 0.11 0.55 89 15) Allyl Chloride 1.80 76 1238 0.90 4.48 83 16) Carbon disulfide 1.80 76 1204 0.10 0.48 # 59 17) Allyl alcohol 1.87 57 178 8.29 41.46 81 18) trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.07 61 156 0.08 0.40 # 29 19) Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.13 73 253 0.05 0.26 # 1 20) 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.21 63 184 Below Cal Below Cal # 45 21) Vinyl Acetate 2.32 43 219 0.38 1.88 # 1 22) 2-Butanone 2.53 72 582852 489.58 2447.92 85 23) Diisopropyl Ether 2.52 45 23878 0.95 4.75 # 61 24) cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.61 61 565 0.08 0.39 97 25) Bromochloromethane 2.71 49 553 0.14 0.72 # 1 26) Chloroform 2.78 83 137 Below Cal Below Cal # 18 27) 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.00 77 0 N.D. N.D. 28) Ethyl tert-butyl ether 2.86 59 330 0.11 0.57 # 1 30) 1,2-Dichloroethane 3.34 62 945 0.22 1.09 92 31) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.39 97 117 0.16 0.78 # 1 32) 1,1-Dichloropropene 3.56 75 244 0.09 0.47 # 1 = qualifier out of range (m) = manual integration 107C0533.D 1W030707.M Mon Mar 12 09:58:08 2007 Page 1 Data File U:\V0A1\070310A\107C0533.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 8:44 Sample 07030507-04A Misc SAMP;8260W_GC MS Integration Params_ RTEINT.P Quant Time: Mar 12 09:57:59 2007 uuancicaci.on xeporc Vial: 44 Operator: DR Inst : MSDVOAI Multiplr: 5.00 Results File: 1W030707.RES SubList: spl_lims.sub Quant Method : U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M (RTE Integrator) Title : 6260W Last Update : Thu Mar 08 14:05:25 2007 Response via : Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth : 1W039707.M Compound R.T. QIon Response OnCol ug/L Qvalue 33) Carbon tetrachloride 0.00 117 0 N.D. N.D. 35) tert-Amyl methyl ether 3.86 73 260 0.17 0.84 # 1 37) Dibromomethane 0.00 174 0 N.D. N.D. 38) 1,2-dichloropropane 4.09 63 570 0.18 0.92 # 1 39) Trichloroethene 4.12 130 165 Below Cal Below Cal 83 40) Bromodichloromethane 4.14 83 502 0.25 1.25 # 25 41) 1,4-Dioxane 0.00 88 0 N.D. N.D. 42) 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 4.48 63 182 4.60 22.98 # 54 43) cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.00 75 0 N.D. N.D. 44) 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 4.59 43 6820 0.76 3.81 # 39 45) trans-1,3-dichloropropene 0.00 75 0 N.D. N.D. 46) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.84 83 1511 0.46 2.31 # 6 49) 1,3-Dichloropropane 4.94 76 749 0.21 1.06 # 7 50) 2-Hexanone 5.07 43 1472 0.84 4.21 # 48 51) Dibromochloromethane 0.00 129 0 N.D. N.D. 52) 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.21 107 165 0.16 0.82 # 1 53) Tetrachloroethene 5.27 166 488 0.11 0.57 75 54) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.52 131 115 0.25 1.25 # 1 56) Chlorobenzene 5.58 112 622 0.04 0.22 # 24 59) Bromoform 0.00 173 0 N.D. N.D. 60) Styrene 5.91 104 432 0.16 0.82 # 10 61) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.90 83 9548 1.46 7.31 # 18 63) 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.99 75 167 0.03 0.16 # 1 64) Isopropylbenzene 6.09 105 7574 0.41 2.07 # 78 66) Bromobenzene 6.18 77 195 Below Cal Below Cal # 58 67) n-Propylbenzene 6.28 91 53878 2.81 14.07 97 68) 2-Chlorotoluene 6.33 91 7995 0.64 3.20 # 41 69) 4-Chlorotoluene 6.35 126 112 Below Cal Below Cal # 1 70) 3-Ethyltoluene 6.35 105 87446 5.39 26.96 # 97 71) 4-Ethyltoluene 6.35 105 87446 5.39 26.96 # 97 72) 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 6.41 105 129009 8.11 40.54 98 73) 2-Ethyltoluene 6.46 105 63013 3.33 16.66 99 74) tert-Butylbenzene 6.52 119 946 0.08 0.41 85 75) 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 6.57 105 306635 18.47 92.33 97 76) sec-Butylbenzene 6.61 105 31326 1.66 8.32 # 51 77) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 6.63 146 412 Below Cal Below Cal # 1 79) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6.66 146 417 0.06 0.29 # 1 80) p-Isopropyltoluene 6.69 119 17384 1.16 5.82 91 81) 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 6.74 105 49123 2.76 13.82 99 82) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 6.80 146 260 0.04 0.19 # 1 83) n-Butylbenzene 6.86 91 153289 9.79 48.96 # 38 84) DBCP 0.00 157 0 N.D. N.D. 85) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.57 180 520 0.22 1.10 # 1 86) Naphthalene 7.68 128 22330 1.08 5.38 94 87) Hexachlorobutadiene 0.00 225 0 N.D. N.D. 88) 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 7.76 180 265 0.08 0.41 # 1 = qualifier out of range (m) = manual integration 107C0533.D 1W030707.M Mon Mar 12 09:58:09 2007 Page 2 I'gp-euezuegwol4o!a•4' L auezuegll4lewul-4'Z' L S'euezuegwonµowwg-q I'Sp-auezuegwol4o U o cl Q o C-i Cl) Q O U S'gp-auaryol O r-I 1) 04 U _ ~ S 4 4.1 4-I a) Ea r-i 04 r. O r--i X 1'euezuegwonylo-q' L auezuegwolyoul-£'Z' L oualMLIdeN euezuegom14ou1-6'Z'L d'aue44ewol43e4G1QM6IS O'euezueglAtna aueyleaoiyoeilel aue41eowwglo-Z L 0 0 0 co ° u, m n O ~ c a r; auouelued-Z-I/ylelry-q 0 ,ayle 1&4A N4lowa4a-z c LQ euedwdwoMo-&'L f~ of 1e4134~do9!0 a ~r v' H z a0 H UW ro. 00 o r o m N r w O N (Q euoleov no C:) •,ra M a a O N r G - r-i ocn O -rl ~r Ul p N 0 c °o 0 °o 0 °o 0 °o 0 °o 0 0 °o °o 0 o° o °o O o 0 o° °0 0° 0 0 o° °o 0 0 o °o U °o o° °0 °o °o o° °o °o °0 °o °0 °o °o °o 0 C) o °o n Y4 U H j V N O co Co Nr N O Go co sr N O a0 so 'd' V E W O v v IT Cl) co c+) m M (N N N N N r r r U N •ri U) Q aU) x ie4le yGnq-uel IZ413 eueylewwolya owo O O fV O N eleleaV AIA O H'(Hdl) SV'J o ao IM ~ le N In ep q y ~ 0 O U') N aueylawwonpoY f. H N sue47awoi40 Ip d'eu e41ewwo140 O O O °0 °o °o ° ° 0 r O Cl O O ^ ° r co co °v N E o P O H W I& Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0530.D 12 Mar 2007 7:33 DR 07030507-01A SAMP;8260_W_GC 41 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W _ TIC Library C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p -Internal Standard---I TIC Top Hit name - RT EstConc Units Response # RT Resp Conc _ C~T Furan, tetrahydro- 3.07 117.5 ug/L 5589270 1 3.31 2378900 50.0 iy..- n r. n 4h: 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:07:19 2007 Page: 10 Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0530.D 12 Mar 2007 7:33 DR 07030507-01A SAMP;8260 W GC 41 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Peak Number 2 Furan, tetrahydro- Concentration Rank 2 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 3.07 117.48 ug/L 5589270 Pentafluorobenzene 3.31 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Furan, tetrahydro- 72 C4H80 000109-99-9 91 2 Furan, tetrahydro- 72 C4H80 000109-99-9 78 3 Furan, tetrahydro- 72 C4H80 000109-99-9 78 4 1-Propene, 2-methoxy- 72 C4H80 000116-11-0 72 5 Oxirane, ethyl- 72 C4H80 000106-88-7 52 Abundance Scan 476 (3.069 min): 10700530.D (466) m/z 42.10 100.00% 42 p i, 5000 72 _ 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 0'' 53rt,114r, 82 105..,,1 '.,,17„ R 1607x, m/z 41. 10 S7.06% m/z--> 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130140150160170 °I Abundance 42 I~ I 5000' , 72 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 27 m/z 72.05 25.84% 05 m/z > 0 10 20 30 53-,- 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130140150160170 Abundance 42 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 5000 m/z 71.00 24.88% 72 " 27 I 5 53 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130140150160170 m/z--> 0 10 _I 70 Abundance 42 , T 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 m/z 43.10 23.69% , 5000 27 72 15 0' 2 53 m/z--> 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130140150160170 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:07:18 2007 Page: 9 s... $u %4i lP~.. HOUSTON LABORATORY 8880 INTERCHANGE DRIVE HOUSTON, TX 77054 (713) 660-0901 Client Sample ID MW-13 Collected: 03/08/2007 15:50 SPL Sample ID: 07030507-02 Site: Centennial, CO Analyses/Method Result QUAL DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS MCL CO_DRO Units: mg/L Diesel Range Organics, C11- C28 4.6 0.082 2 2 03112/07 13:13 NW 3716480 Surr: n-Pentacosane 108 0 % 21-130 2 03/12/07 13:13 NW 3716480 Prep Method Prep Date Prep Initials :Prep Factor SW3510C 03/10/200714:24 LLL 1.00 _J D'Anna Stelly Project Manager Qualifiers: ND/U - Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit J - Estimated Value between MDL and PQL >MCL - Result Over Maximum Contamination Limit(MCL) D - Surrogate Recovery Unreportable due to Dilution MI - Matrix Interference - Surrogate Recovery Outside Advisable QC Limits TNTC - Too numerous to count E - Concentrations exceeding Calibration range of Instrument B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank above Rep.Limit 3/16/2007 2:40:56 PM MDL Rep.Limit Dil. Factor Date Analyzed Analyst Seq. # amn yr %.f .e... lf~.. HOUSTON LABORATORY 8880 INTERCHANGE DRIVE HOUSTON, TX 77054 (713) 660-0901 Client Sample ID MW-13 Collected: 03/08/2007 15:50 SPL Sample ID: 07030507-02 Site: Centennial, CO Analyses/Method Result QUAL MDL Rep.Llmlt Dil. Factor Date Analyzed Analyst Seq. # VOLATILE ORGANICS BY METHOD 8260B MCL SW8260B Units: u !L Benzene ND 0.053 1 1 03/12/0710:31 D R 3716127 t yl enzene 0.42 J 0.056 5 1 - 03/12/07 10:31 D R 3716127 Gasoline Range Organics - - 4000 5.7 50 1 03/12/07 10:31 D R 3716127 Toluene m,p-Xylene - o Xylene ND 1.5 - 0.13 J J 0.092 0.08 0.046 5 5 5 1 1 1 03112/0710:31 03/1210710:31 03/12/07 10:31 - D R D_R D R 3716127 3716127 3716127 Xylenes,Total 1.63 J 0.046 5 1 03/12/0710:31 D R 3716127 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 urr:4-Bromofluorobenzene 102 102 0 0 % 71-140 % 70-130 1 1 03112/0710:31 03/12/07 10:31 D R D R 3716127 3716127 5urr: Toluene-d8 95.9 0 % 61-121 1 03/12/07 10:31 D R 3716127 D'Anna Stelly Project Manager Qualifiers: ND/U - Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit >MCL - Result Over Maximum Contamination Limit(MCL) J - Estimated Value between MDL and PQL D - Surrogate Recovery Unreportable due to Dilution MI - Matrix Interference " Surrogate Recovery Outside Advisable QC Limits TNTC - Too numerous to count E - Concentrations exceeding Calibration range of Instrument B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank above Rep.Limit 3/16/2007 2'40'57 PM Data File U:\VOA1\070310A\107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260W_GC MS Integration Params_ RTEINT.P Quant Time: Mar 12 10:43:11 2007 Vial: 46 Operator: DR Inst : MSDVOAI Multiplr: 1.00 Results File: 1W030707.RES SubList: spl lims.sub Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M (RTE Integrator) Title 8260 W Last Update Thu Mar 08 14:05:25 2007 Response via Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth 1W030707.M Compound R.T. QIon Response OnCol ug/L Dev(Min) Internal Standards 1) Pentafluorobenzene 3.32 168 481654 50.00 0.00 36) 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 114 720074 50.00 0.00 55) Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 82 350275 50.00 0.00 78) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 152 298877 50.00 0.00 System Monitoring Compounds 29) 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 3.27 6S 359661 51.00 51.00 0.00 Spiked Amount 50.000 Recovery = 102.00°% 47) Toluene-d8 4.89 98 808228 47.95 47.95 0.00 Spiked Amount 50.000 Recovery = 95.900 65) 4-Bromofluorobenzene 6.10 95 329697 51.08 51.08 0.00 Spiked Amount 50.000 Recovery = 102.160 Target Compounds Qvalue 2) GAS (TPH) 2.00 TIC 129573589m 3989.19 3989.19 34) Benzene 3.70 78 1068 N.D. N.D. 48) Toluene 4.92 91 1408 N.D. N.D. S7) Ethylbenzene 5.68 91 9842 0.42 0.42 87 58) m,p-Xylene 5.77 91 30973 1.54 1.54 97 62) o-Xylene 5.94 91 3549 0.13 0.13 # 79 Target Compounds not in Sublist Qvalue 3) Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.00 85 0 N.D. N.D. 4) Chloromethane 0.98 50 932 0.25 0.25 85 5) Vinyl Chloride 1.06 62 142 N.D. N.D. 6) Bromomethane 1.17 96 225 Below Cal Below Cal # 1 7) Chloroethane 1.22 64 830 0.42 0.42 # 70 8) Trichlorofluoromethane 0.00 101 0 N.D. N.D. 9) Acrolein 1.43 56 350 0.31 0.31 # 68 10) Acetone 1.48 58 65099 34.40 34.40 80 11) 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.00 96 0 N.D. N.D. 12) t-Butyl Alcohol 1.67 59 2558 0.70 0.70 # 66 13) Acrylonitrile 1.69 53 122 0.27 0.27 # 32 14) Methylene Chloride 1.71 49 469 Below Cal Below Cal 72 15) Allyl Chloride 1.80 76 918 0.67 0.67 # 42 16) Carbon disulfide 1.80 76 977 N.D. N.D. 17) Allyl alcohol 1.79 57 263 8.51 8.51 # 1 18) trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.06 61 120 N.D. N.D. 19) Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.13 73 1449 0.11 0.11 5 20) 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.27 63 243 Below Cal Below Cal 4 21) Vinyl Acetate 2.34 43 110 0.37 0.37 / 1 22) 2-Butanone 2.53 72 119684 68.26 68.26 S 23) Diisopropyl Ether 2.53 45 5622 0.27 0.27 88 24) cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.61 61 209 N.D. N.D. 25) Bromochloromethane 2.70 49 124 N.D. N.D. 26) Chloroform 2.78 83 433 N.D. N.D. 27) 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.00 77 0 N.D. N.D. 28) Ethyl tert-butyl ether 2.89 59 326 0.11 0.11 # 47 30) 1,2-Dichloroethane 3.33 62 3888 0.46 0.46 # 44 31) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.38 97 159 0.16 0.16 # 45 32) 1,1-Dichloropropene 3.55 75 428 0.11 0.11 # 36 = qualifier out of range (m) = manual integration 107C 0535.D 1W030707.M Mon Mar 12 10:43:20 2007 Page 1 Data File U:\VOA1\070310A\107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260W_GC MS Integration Params_ RTEINT.P Quant Time: Mar 12 10:43:11 2007 Vial: 46 Operator: DR Inst : MSDVOAI Multiplr: 1.00 Results File: 1W030707.RES SubList: spl lims.sub Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M (RTE Integrator) Title 8260 W Last Update Thu Mar 08 14:05:25 2007 Response via Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth 1W030707.M Compound R.T. QIon Response OnCol u g/L Qvalue 33) Carbon tetrachloride 3.66 117 176 0.25 0.25 # 12 35) tert-Amyl methyl ether 3.84 73 184 0.16 0.16 # 1 37) Dibromomethane 0.00 174 0 N.D. N.D. 38) 1,2-dichloropropane 4.08 63 279 0.12 0.12 # 31 39) Trichloroethene 4.13 130 211 Below Cal Below Cal # 29 40) Bromodichloromethane 4.14 83 2902 0.56 0.56 # 33 41) 1,4-Dioxane 0.00 88 0 N.D. N.D. 42) 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 4.50 63 425 4.76 4.76 # 1 43) cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 4.52 75 150 0.27 0.27 # 1 44) 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 4.60 43 21838 1.50 1.50 # 43 45) trans-1,3-dichloropropene 4.79 75 222 0.38 0.38 # 1 46) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.84 83 6505 1.43 1.43 # 6 49) 1,3-Dichloropropane 4.96 76 238 0.14 0.14 # 1 50) 2-Hexanone 5.07 43 2056 0.85 0.85 76 51) Dibromochloromethane 0.00 129 0 N.D. N.D. 52) 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.17 107 221 0.16 0.16 # 1 53) Tetrachloroethene 5.27 166 317 N.D. N.D. 54) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.52 131 264 0.28 0.28 # 1 56) Chlorobenzene 5.62 112 1718 0.12 0.12 76 59) Bromoform 0.00 173 0 N.D. N.D. 60) Styrene 5.91 104 294 0.15 0.15 # 13 61) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.90 83 7834 1.07 1.07 # 17 63) 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 6.00 75 271 N.D. N.D. 64) Isopropylbenzene 6.10 105 33285 1.68 1.68 # 90 66) Bromobenzene 6.18 77 368 Below Cal e w Cal # 51 67) n-Propylbenzene 6.28 91 387066 14.93 14.93 98 68) 2-Chlorotoluene 6.28 91 381974 26.54 6.54 4 38 69) 4-Chlorotoluene 6.35 126 410 N.D. N.D. 70) 3-Ethyltoluene 6.35 105 427232 24.01 24.01 99 71) 4-Ethyltoluene 6.35 105 427232 24.01 4.01 99 72) 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 6.41 105 553914 31.35 31.35 97 73) 2-Ethyltoluene 6.46 105 239996 11.29 ' 11.29 98 74) tert-Butylbenzene 6.52 119 1191 0.09 / 0.09 # 31 75) 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 6.57 105 1165371 64.7 64.71 98 76) sec-Butylbenzene 6.61 105 213674 10.16 ' 10.16 # 48 77) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 6.63 146 316 Below Cal Below Cal # 1 79) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6.65 146 697 0.08 0.08 # 1 80) p-Isopropyltoluene 6.69 119 113710 6.62 6.62 97 81) 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 6.74 105 84465 4.38 4.38 97 82) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 6.80 146 320 N.D. Z N.D. 83) n-Butylbenzene 6.86 91 1291972 77.98 V 77.98 # 41 84) DBCP 6.98 157 787 0.71 0.71 # 1 85) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.57 180 816 0.26 0.26 # 83 86) Naphthalene 7.67 128 49102 1.96 1.96 # 73 87) Hexachlcrobutadiene 0.00 225 0 N.D. N.D. 88) 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 7.78 180 1142 0.21 0.21 # 29 = qualifier out of range (m) = manual integration 107C0535.D 1W030707.M Mon Mar 12 10:43:21 2007 Page 2 O rl a 9 N O qo C ~o tx U1 M O ~r Q ~ r-I in o ~ 17 M O r r Q, U .L17 'rl F- C la ~ c~ N to r-I OI O Q in M Ln 0 C14 O r-I r-I M H F( 0 1 o -A U W U M la ~ 0 r N 3 h o o 0 o i O U) lO E r-I O N «S F1', S4 U) CO l4 0 4 > 04 / O N h C H o (n O -rl H U1 v ri U O W N O a «S aUH 4j C3' W ,p (R1 U ((1 -H m Q Q I:t W x z r- r- O O O a~ d O O 0 0 0 CD M N O O r r r O co _ ,)'auazuaglA4la 0 U~ M f` 61 O 4 o 04 0 v; 0 0 O U? U) 8ue4l9owojq!0-Z't %r auouexaH-Z "~I p S'gp-auanlol euedadoiol4oia-Vi to (D L') eue~~~~4~!P~k.'1lSt~el11 ~ i. o uou eluad-Z-IR41a W-4 ~e4~ ~ ~d96aZen Lo guefw.jod4oi4ou au a w I44o PZ't=- . ti p _p I'auezuagaong!(1- L41a lA4latL -Ix-)Jai a J apuol4oeilel uogieo O ' euedad0joI43lp-t t aue ao ! CL'L M Y o 0 ja41a I4lnq-Pal 1A413 CO r ~a413810 _L O N N 9181-V Mu!A •:i iegla 1~4nq-Yal 1A479W - M N -0 H•(Hd-L) SVS M N OWRIo Ally C) Io4~~ ~ r-1 Lr) N yy a U19PA I tl 'i aue4law014z) o d'aue4l8waol40 O O O C) CD O O O O C) C) 0 CD C O O O O O r- 0 0 V C) CD 0 C) m M oN - E o F M O 3 - H Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260_W_GC ALS Vial 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title : 8260_W c TIC Library C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p --Internal Standard--- TIC Top Hit name RT EstConc Units Response RT ResP Conc I Carbon dioxide 0.83 96.9 ug/L 3406160 1 3.32 1757740 50.0 Pentane, 3-methyl- 2.26 5.4 ug/L 189948 1 3.32 1757740 50.0 Furan, tetrahydro- 3.07 51.5 ug/L 1810550 1 3.32 1757740 50.0 2-Pentene, 2,4-di... 3.46 2.2 ug/L 76673 1 3.32 1757740 50.0 Pentane, 2,3-dime... 3.71 10.3 ug/L 415990 2 3.90 2019490 50.0 Hexane, 3-methyl- 3.79 26.4 ug/L 1065240 2 3.90 2019490 50.0 Cyclopentane, 1,3... 3.95 10.3 ug/L 414276 2 3.90 2019490 50.0 Cyclopentane, 1,2... 3.98 11.7 ug/L 472487 2 3.90 2019490 50.0 Cyclopropane, 1,1... 4.29 3.3 ug/L 133631 2 3.90 2019490 50.0 Cyclohexane, methyl- 4.40 26.2 ug/L 1056240 2 3.90 2019490 50.0 2-Octene, (E)- 4.66 2.8 ug/L 113873 2 3.90 2019490 50.0 1-Hexene, 4,5-dim... 4.69 5.2 ug/L 209709 2 3.90 2019490 50.0 Cyclopropane, 1,1... 5.25 1.8 ug/L 74329 3 5.56 2084190 50.0 3-Ethylcyclopenta... 5.33 2.1 ug/L 88324 3 5.56 2084190 50.0 Heptane, 2,6-dime... 5.36 5.1 ug/L 213594 3 5.56 2084190 50.0 1-Pentanol, 2-eth... 5.41 2.6 ug/L 109355 3 5.56 2084190 50.0 ilu Nonane 5.85 12.7 ug/L 528256 3 5.56 2084190 50.0 Octane, 2,5-dimet... 6.02 5.9 ug/L 245120 3 5.56 2084190 50.0 Benzene, 1,4-diet... 6.80 61.2 ug/L 3865060 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 M Benzene, 4-ethyl-... 7.03 140.7 ug/L 8888330 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 1-etheny... 7.06 36.6 ug/L 2313350 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 1-methyl... 7.08 37.4 ug/L 2365570 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 1-ethyl-... 7.12 24.9 ug/L 1575980 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 1-methyl... 7.15 34.9 ug/L 2203090 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 2-Methylindan-2-ol 7.18 18.6 ug/L 1177580 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 1-methyl... 7.24 76.1 ug/L 4806700 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-... 7.26 136.9 ug/L 8648380 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 1-methyl... 7.29 73.7 ug/L 4653030 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzeneacetic aci... 7.33 59.8 ug/L 3778780 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 1H-Indene, 2,3-di... 7.35 32.5 ug/L 2052500 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 2-ethyl-... 7.39 28.3 ug/L 1789430 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Indan, 1-methyl- 7.41 49.5 ug/L 3125010 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 1-methyl... 7.43 38.4 ug/L 2428430 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 1-methyl... 7.46 91.4 ug/L 5775380 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 trans-l-Phenyl-i-... 7.83 60.3 ug/L 3809020 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, (2,2-dim... 7.87 20.4 ug/L 1291130 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 1H-Indene, 2,3-di... 7.93 76.9 ug/L 4859870 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 1,4-dime... 7.97 13.4 ug/L 845053 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 .alpha.,.beta.,.b... 8.02 84.5 ug/L 5337370 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 1-(1-met... 8.10 5.1 ug/L 323685 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 + Benzene, (1-methy... 8.12 48.9 ug/L 3089570 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 1-methyl... 8.17 18.3 ug/L 1154720 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 S` Naphthalene, 1,2,... 8.23 8.7 ug/L 551356 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Naphthalene, 1-me... 8.27 69.9 ug/L 4413220 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Naphthalene, 1,2,... 8.32 6.1 ug/L 385427 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Naphthalene, 1-me... 8.37 34.1 ug/L 2155150 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Naphthalene, 1,2,... 8.43 8.3 ug/L 526828 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Tetradecane 8.46 10.3 ug/L 649662 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 1-(1-met... 8.52 4.8 ug/L 305931 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Benzene, 1,3-bis(... 8.58 3.7 ug/L 236542 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 Biphenyl 8.63 1.9 ug/L 117410 4 6.65 3158860 50.0 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 25 Benzene, 1-(2 -but... 8.72 4.6 ug/L 292772 4 6.65 3158860 50 0 Naphthalene, 1-et... 8.78 14.1 ug/L 890009 4 6.65 3158860 . 50 0 Naphthalene, 2,7-... 8.88 21.0 ug/L 1327610 4 6.65 3158860 . 50 0 Naphthalene, 1,7-... 8.95 17.1 ug/L 1080840 4 6.65 3158860 . 50 0 Naphthalene, 1,6-... 8.99 8.2 ug/L 517787 4 6.65 3158860 . 50 0 Naphthalene, 1,4-... 9.10 5.4 ug/L 338731 4 6.65 3158860 . 50 0 Naphthalene, 1,3-... 9.20 1.9 ug/L 120001 4 6.65 3158860 . 50.0 asr. 61st 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 26 Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial _ _ 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Abundance TI C:107C0535.D 1e+07, 8000000! 6000000 4000000! 0.83 2000000 j 6Q TU..36 , 0.A.0MD511.7wi2242g3,.a84347 1:625 IM 2.53 1:9AWW91122P2t.243844 . 2227221 Time > 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 Abundance TI C:107C0535.D 1e+07 8000000! 6000000 4000000 4.89 5.56 2000000 3.90 3.07 3` 3.40 6.10 6.3' - _JO~ 03.g.$ u9 65771., 84 39538 4g41821~4~344~~04.~g1 b~SLA4&1'597J'_~4~832)6, 6_ Time--> 3.60 3.80 4.00 4.20 4.40 4.60 4.80 5.00 5.20 5.40 5.60 5.80 6.00 6.20 Abundance TIC: 107C0535.D 1e+07 6.9 7.14 8000000' EW 111 6000000 7.62 6.57 4000000 7 5tt7.93 8.27 ;L67 8.02 8.12 7.83 , 6.65 7.0~ 151 i III 7.$0 i; ill it 6.41 .1 11 ~I 2000000 16 6i 77 7q~ E " 7.Tfl7b 7.87~f 9;y 18 0 Time--> 6.40 6.60 6.80 7.00 7.20 7.40 7.60 7.80 8.00 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:19:29 2007 8.37 f8 34A 78 ~B %?6Pilo,. 9.109.20 8.40 8.60 8.80 9.00 9.20 Page: 6 Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Aca On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial _ _ 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Peak Number 1 Carbon dioxide Concentration Rank 3 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 0.83 96.89 ug/L 3406160 Pentafluorobenzene 3.32 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Carbon dioxide 44 CO2 000124-38-9 4 2 Ethylene oxide 44 C2H4O 000075-21-8 3 3 Carbon dioxide 44 CO2 000124-38-9 3 4 Nitrous Oxide 44 N20 010024-97-2 3 5 Nitrous Oxide 44 N20 010024-97-2 3 Peak Number 2 Pentane, 3-methyl- Concentr ation Rank 43 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 2.26 5.40 ug/L 189948 Pentafluorobenzene 3.32 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MclForm CAS# Qual 1 Pentane, 3-methyl- 86 C6H14 000096-14-0 47 2 Oxirane, (1-methylethyl)- 86 C5H100 001438-14-8 45 3 Pentane, 3-methyl- 86 C6H14 000096-14-0 43 4 2-Propen-l-amine, 2-methyl- 71 C4H9N 002878-14-0 40 5 Pentane, 2,2,3-trimethyl- 114 C8H18 000564-02-3 39 Peak Number 3 Furan, tetrahydro- Concentration Rank 13 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 3.07 51.50 ug/L 1810550 Pentafluorobenzene 3.32 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Furan, tetrahydro- 72 C4H80 000109-99-9 2 Furan, tetrahydro- 72 C4H80 000109-99-9 3 1-Propene, 2-methoxy- 72 C4H80 000116-11-0 4 Oxirane, ethyl- 72 C4H80 000106-88-7 5 Oxirane, ethyl- 72 C4H80 000106-88-7 Peak Number 4 2-Pentene, 2,4-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 55 R.T. Est one Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 3.46 2.18 g/L 76673 Pentafluorobenzene 3.32 1W030707.M Thu Mar 5 13:20:11 2007 Qual 91 83 64 56 52 Lyµ Page: 7 Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260_W GC ALS Vial 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Hit# of 5 Te tative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 2-Pentene, 2,4-d ethyl- - 98 C7H14 000625-65-0 83 2 2-Pentene, 2,4-di thyl- 98 C7H14 000625-65-0 83 3 2-Pentene, 3,4-dim hyl-, (Z)- 98 C7H14 004914-91-4 83 4 2-Pentene, 2,4-dime yl- 98 C7H14 000625-65-0 80 5 2-Pentene, 4,4-di meth 1-, (E)- 98 C7H14 000690-08-4 80 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Peak Number 5 Pentane, 2,3-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 35 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 3.71 10.30 ug/L 415990 1,4 -Difluorobenzene 3.90 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm - CAS# Qual 1 Pentane, 2,3-dimethyl- 100 C7H16 000565-59-3 64 2 Pentane, 2,3-dimethyl- 100 C7H16 000565-59-3 64 3 Pentane, 2,3-dimethyl- 100 C7H16 000565-59-3 64 s, 4 Pentane, 2,3-dimethyl- 100 C7H16 000565-59-3 50 5 1-Octene, 3,7-dimethyl- 140 C10H20 004984-01-4 38 Peak Number 6 Hexane, 3-methyl- Concentration Rank 23 R.T. EstConc Area - Relative to ISTD R.T. 3.79 26 - .37 ug/L 1065240 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Hexane, 3-methyl- 100 C7H16 000589-34-4 2 Hexane, 3-methyl- 100 C7H16 000589-34-4 3 Heptane, 3,4-dimethyl- 128 C9H20 000922-28-1 4 Hexane, 3-methyl- 100 C7H16 000589-34-4 S Heptane, 3,4-dimethyl- 128 C9H20 000922-28-1 Peak Number 7 Cyclopentane, 1,3-dimethyl-... Concentration Rank 37 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 3.95 10.26 ug/L 414276 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Cyclopentane, 1,3-dimethyl-, cis- 98 C7H14 002532-58-3 2 Cyclopentane, 1,2-dimethyl-, trans- 98 C7H14 000822-50-4 3 Cyclopentane, 1,3-dimethyl- 98 C7H14 002453-00-1 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Qual 93 72 64 58 56 Qual 81 72 68 Page: 8 ~b. 9r I:trj Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial _ _ 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title : 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p 4 1-Heptene, 3-methyl- 5 2-Heptene, (E)- 112 CBH16 004810-09-7 59 98 C7H14 014686-13-6 53 rt Peak Number 8 Cyclopentane, 1,2-dimethyl-... Concentration Rank 34 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 3.98 11.70 ug/L 472487 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Cyclopentane, 1,2-dimethyl-, trans- 98 C7H14 000822-50-4 78 2 Cyclopentane, 1,2-dimethyl-, trans- 98 C7H14 000822-50-4 72 3 1-Heptene 98 C7H14 000592-76-7 64 4 Isopropylcyclobutane 98 C7H14 000872-56-0 64 5 Cyclopentane, 1,2-dimethyl- 98 C7H14 002452-99-5 64 Peak Number 9 Cyclopropane, 1,1,2,3-tetra... Concentration Rank 52 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 4.29 3.31 ug/L 133631 1,4 -Difluorobenzene 3.90 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Cyclopropane, 1,1,2,3-t tramethyl- 98 C7H14 074752-93-5 87 2 2-Pentene, 4,4-dimethyl- 98 C7H14 026232-98-4 83 3 2-Pentene, 2,3-dimethyl- 98 C7H14 010574-37-5 64 4 5-Methyl-3-heptene 112 C8H16 050422-80-5 59 5 3,4-Dimethyl-2-hexene (c,t) 112 C8H16 002213-37-8 53 Peak Number 10 Cyclohexane, methyl- Concentration Rank 24 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 4.40 26.15 ug/L 1056240 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Cyclohexane, methyl- 98 C7H14 000108-87-2 96 2 Cyclohexane, methyl- 98 C7H14 000108-87-2 95 3 Cyclohexane, methyl- 98 C7H14 000108-87-2 72 4 2-Pentene, 3,4-dimethyl-, (Z)- 98 C7H14 004914-91-4 64 5 2-Pentene, 2,3-dimethyl- 98 C7H14 010574-37-5 64 Peak Number 11 2-Octene, (E)- Concentration Rank 53 „r I- 4 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 9 Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial _ _ 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 4.66 2\2 ug/L 113873 1 4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 Hit# of 5 Tb-Atative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 2-Octene, (E)- 112 C8H16 013389-42-9 2 2-Octene 112 C8H16 000111-67-1 3 4-Octene, (E)- 112 C8H16 014850-23-8 4 1-Heptene, 3-methyl- 112 C8H16 004810-09-7 5 Cyclopenta ne, 1,2,3-trimethyl-, 112 C8H16 015890-40-1 Peak Number 1.2 1-Hexene, 4,5-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 45 Qual 68 59 59 59 52 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 4.69 5.19 ug/L 209709 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 H it# of 5 Tentative MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 1-Hexene, 4,5-dimethyl- - 112 C8H16 016106-59-5 42 2 1-Hexene, 4-ethyl- 112 C8H16 016746-85-3 33 3 1-Dodecanol, 3,7,11-trimethyl- 228 C15H320 006750-34-1 25 4 4,4-Dimethyl-l-hexene 12 C8H16 001647-08-1 25 5 3-Methylpyridazin-5-one 11 C5HBN20 1000130-58- 4 18 Peak Number 13 Cyclopropane, 1,1-dimethyl-... Concentration Rank 59 R.T. E Conc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 5.25 1.78 g/L 74329 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 Hit# of 5 Ten tive ID - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MW - - - - - MolForm - CAS# Qual 1 Cyclopropane, 1,1-d ethyl-2-(1- - - - 124 - - - - - - - - - - - - C9H16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 074779-84-3 50 2 7-Octen-4-ol, 2-methy -6-methyle 154 ClOH180 035628-05-8 47 3 Cyclohexene, 3,5,5-trim thyl- 124 C9H16 000933-12-0 43 4 Cyclohexene, 3,5,5-trimet 1- 124 C9H16 000933-12-0 30 5 1,5-Cyclooctadiene, 3,4-dim hyl - 136 ClOH16 021284-05-9 27 Peak Number 14 3-Ethylcyclopentanone Concentration Rank 56 R.T. EstC c Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 5.33 2.12 /L 88324 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 Hit# of 5 Te ative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 10 sy,E .a.- Gyy s.- G!k Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial _ _ 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title : 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p I 3-Eropentanone 112 C7H12O 010264-55-8 53 ro 2 Cyclopentan 1-ethyl-3-methyl- 112 C8H16 003726-47-4 46 3 4-Pentenal, -ethyl- 112 C7H120 005204-80-8 43 4 Cyclopentane, -ethyl-3-methyl-,... 112 C8H16 002613-66-3 43 5 2(5H)-Furanone, -(2-methyl-3-me... 166 ClOH1402 1000155-85- 8 38 Peak Number 15 Heptane, 2,6-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 46 R.T. EstCo Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 5.36 5.12 ug 213594 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 H it# of 5 Tentat' e ID MW MolForm - CAS# Qual 1 Heptane, 2,6-dimethyl- 128 C9H20 001072-05-5 64 2 Octane, 2-methyl- 128 C9H20 003221-61-2 59 3 Heptadecane, 2-methyl- 254 C18H38 001560-89-0 59 4 Decane 142 ClOH22 000124-18-5 53 5 Octane, 3,5-dimethyl- 142 ClOH22 015869-93-9 50 Peak Number 16 1-Pentanol, 2-ethyl-4-me hyl- Concentration Rank 54 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 5.41 2.62 u L 109355 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 H it# of 5 Ten tive ID MW MolForm CAS## Qual 1 1-Pentanol, 2-ethy -4-methyl- 130 C8H180 000106-67-2 59 2 1-Hexene, 5,5-dimet 1- 112 C8H16 007116-86-1 52 1.0 3 1-Heptadecene 238 C17H34 006765-39-5 50 4 Heptane, 2,5-dimethyl- 128 C9H20 002216-30-0 49 5 Nonane, 3-methyl- 142 ClOH22 005911-04-6 47 Peak Number 17 Nonane Concentration Rank 33 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 5.85 12.67 ug/L 528256 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Ncnane 128 C9H20 000111-84-2 83 2 Octane 114 C8H18 000111-65-9 64 3 Nonane 128 C9H20 000111-84-2 64 4 Nonane 128 C9H20 000111-84-2 58 5 Pentane, 2,2,3,4-tetramethyl- 128 C9H20 001186-53-4 53 ~y 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 11 Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial _ _ 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Peak Number 18 Octane, 2,5-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 42 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 6.02 5 .88 ug/L 245120 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Octane, 2,5-dimethyl- 142 - ClOH22 015869-89-3 90 2 Octane, 2,5-dimethyl- 142 ClOH22 015869-89-3 83 3 Octane, 2,3-dimethyl- 142 ClOH22 007146-60-3 64 4 Heptane, 2-methyl- 114 C8H18 000592-27-8 59 5 Pentane, 2,2,3,3-tetramethyl- 128 C9H20 007154-79-2 59 Peak Number 19 Benzene, 1,4-diethyl- Concentration Rank 10 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 6.80 61 .18 ug/L 3865060 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1,4-diethyl- 134 ClOH14 000105-05-5 97 2 Benzene, 1,2-diethyl- 134 ClOH14 000135-01-3 96 3 Benzene, 1,2-diethyl- 134 ClOH14 000135-01-3 96 4 Benzene, 1,3-diethyl- 134 ClOH14 000141-93-5 94 5 Benzene, 4-ethyl-1,2-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000934-80-5 91 Peak Number 20 Benzene, 4-ethyl-1,2-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 1 t- t R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.03 140.69 ug/L 8888330 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual iw 1 Benzene, 4-ethyl-1,2-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000934-80-5 96 2 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,3-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 002870-04-4 95 3 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000099-87-6 95 4 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000527-84-4 95 5 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000527-84-4 95 zyp~ Peak Number 21 Benzene, 1-ethenyl-3-ethyl- Concentration Rank 18 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 12 j- Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p 7.06 36 .62 ug/L 2313350 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Benzene, 1-ethenyl-3-ethyl- 132 ClOH12 007525-62-4 2 Indan, 1 -methyl- 132 ClOH12 000767-58-8 3 1-Phenyl -l-butene 132 ClOH12 000824-90-8 4 Benzene, (2-methyl-l-propenyl)- 132 ClOH12 000768-49-0 5 Benzene, 2-butenyl- 132 ClOH12 001560-06-1 Peak Number 22 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-meth... Concentration Rank 17 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.08 37.44 ug/L 2365570 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000527-84-4 2 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000099-87-6 3 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylpro... 148 C11H16 001595-16-0 4 Benzene, 1,2,3,4-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000488-23-3 5 Benzene, 1,2,3,5-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000527-53-7 Qual x 87 81 S 72 72 72 Qual 83 83 76 70 70 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Peak Number 23 Benzene, 1-ethyl-3-(1-methy... Concentration Rank 25 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.12 24. 95 ug/L 1575980 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene -d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Benzene, 1-ethyl-3-(1-methylethyl)- 148 C11H16 004920-99-4 2 Ethanone, 1-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)- 148 ClOH120 003637-01-2 3 Ethanone, 1-(2,4-dimethylphenyl)- 148 ClOH120 000089-74-7 4 Benzene, 1-methoxy-2-(1-methylet... 148 ClOH120 010278-02-1 5 Benzene, 2,4-diethyl-l-methyl- 148 ClIH16 001758-85-6 Qual 87 70 70 64 64 Peak Number 24 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-meth... Concentration Rank 19 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.15 34.87 ug/L 2203090 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000527-84-4 97 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 13 4 Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0535.D 12 Mar 2007 10:31 DR 07030507-02A SAMP;8260_W_GC 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260 W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p 2 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000527-84-4 97 3 Benzene, 1-ethyl-2,3-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000933-98-2 96 4 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000099-87-6 95 5 Benzene, 1-methyl-3-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000535-77-3 94 Peak Number 5 2-Methylindan-2-ol Concentration Rank 28 R.T. EstCo Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.18 18. 64 ug 1177580 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 2-Methyli ndan-2-ol - 148 ClOH120 033223-84-6 72 2 Benzene, (1-methylbutyl 148 C11H16 002719-52-0 64 3 Benzene, (1,2-dimethylpro 1)- 148 C11H16 004481-30-5 64 4 Benzene, (1-methylbutyl)- 148 C11H16 002719-52-0 59 5 Benzene, (1,2-dimethylpropy - 148 C11H16 004481-30-5 59 Peak Number 26 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-meth... Concentration Rank 7 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.24 76.08 ug/L 4806700 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual - 1 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000527-84-4 97 2 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,3-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 002870-04-4 96 3 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000095-93-2 95 4 Benzene, 1,2,3,4-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000488-23-3 95 5 Benzene, 1,2,3,5-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000527-53-7 95 Peak Number 27 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-tetramethyl- Concentration Rank 2 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.26 136.89 ug/L 8648380 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual - 1 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000095-93-2 94 2 Benzene, 1,2,3,5-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000527-53-7 91 3 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,4-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 001758-88-9 91 4 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000095-93-2 90 5 Benzene, 1-ethyl-2,3-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000933-98-2 90 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 14 Ills npe~ Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107CO535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial _ _ 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Peak Number 28 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-meth... Concentration Rank 8 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.29 73 .65 ug/L 4653030 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylpro 148 C11H16 001595-16-0 87 2 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,4-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 001758-88-9 64 3 Benzene, 1-ethyl-3,5-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000934-74-7 64 4 Benzene, 1-ethyl-2,3-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000933-98-2 59 5 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,4-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 001758-88-9 59 Peak Number 29 Benzeneacetic acid, alpha.... Concentration Rank 12 R.T. E ea Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.33 5 780 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of \ MW MolForm - CAS# Qual 1 Benzene .-amin 151 C8H9NO2 002935-35-5 50 2 Benzena 149 ClOH15N 001126-78-9 50 3 Benzena " 121 C8H11N 000578-54-1 50 4 Benzena n 135 C9H13N 000622-80-0 50 5 Benzena 135 C9H13N 002696-84-6 50 * * * * * * * * * * * * * Peak Number 30 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-5-me... Concentration Rank 21 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.35 32.49 ug/L 2052500 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.6S H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual - 1 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-5-methyl- 132 ClOH12 000874-35-1 90 2 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4-methyl- 132 ClOH12 000824-22-6 87 3 Indan, 1-methyl- 132 ClOH12 000767-58-8 80 4 Benzene, (2-methyl-l-propenyl)- 132 ClOH12 000768-49-0 78 5 Benzene, (1-methyl-l-propenyl)-, 132 ClOH12 000768-00-3 78 Peak Number 31 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,3-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 22 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.39 28.32 ug/L 1789430 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 r4 1WO30707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 15 Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial _ _ 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,3-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 002870-04-4 2 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000099-87-6 3 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylpro... 148 C11H16 001595-16-0 4 Disiloxa ne, 1,1,3,3-tetramethyl- 134 C4H14OSi2 003277-26-7 5 Benzene, 1,2,3,4-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000488-23-3 Peak Number 32 Indan, 1-methyl- Concentration Rank 14 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.41 49.46 ug/L 3125010 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene- d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Indan, 1-methyl- 132 ClOH12 000767-58-8 2 Indan, 1-methyl- 132 ClOH12 000767-58-8 3 Benzene, 1,1'-(1,5-hexadiene-1,6... 234 C18H18 004439-45-6 4 m-Aminophenylacetylene 117 C8H7N 054060-30-9 5 Benzene, (2-bromocyclopropyl)- 196 C9H9Br 036617-02-4 ual 86 70 68 64 59 •I.- Qual 86 86 53 47 43 Peak Number 33 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-meth... Concentration Rank 16 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.43 38.44 ug/L 2428430 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentativ ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-m thylpro 148 C11H16 001595-16-0 2 Benzene, 1-ethyl-2,3-dime yl- 134 ClOH14 000933-98-2 3 Benzene, 1-ethyl-3,5-dime 1- 134 ClOH14 000934-74-7 4 Benzene, 1-ethyl-2,3-dimethy - 134 ClOH14 000933-98-2 5 Benzene, 2-ethyl-l,3-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 002870-04-4 Qual 64 58 53 53 50 Peak Number 34 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-meth... Concentration Rank 4 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.46 91.42 ug/L 5775380 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MclForm CAS# Qual - 1 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylpro 148 C11H16 001595-16-0 91 2 Benzene, (1,1-dimethylpropyl)- 148 C11H16 002049-95-8 91 3 Benzene, (1,1-dimethylpropyl)- 148 C11H16 002049-95-8 91 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 16 its Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial : _ _ 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p 4 Benzene, (1,1-dimethylpropyl)- 148 C11H16 5 Benzene, 1-ethyl-2,4-dimethyl- 134 C10H14 002049-95-8 86 000874-41-9 72 Peak Number 35 trans-l-Phenyl-l-pentene Concentration Rank 11 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. - 7.83 60.29 ug/L 3809020 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 trans-l-Phenyl-1-pentene 146 C11H14 016002-93-0 50 2 Benzene, 1-pentenyl- 146 C11H14 000826-18-6 50 3 Bicvclo[4.2.1]nona-2,4,7-triene 146 C11H14 1000164-42-6 49 4 Benzene, (1-ethyl-2-propenyl)- 146 C11H14 019947-22-9 43 5 Benzene, (1-ethyl-l-propenyl)- 146 C11H14 004701-36-4 42 Peak Number 36 Benzene, (2,2-dimethyl-l-me... Concentration Rank 27 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.87 20.44 ug/L 1291130 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative MW MolForm CAS# 1 Benzene, (2,2-dimethyl-i-m thyle 160 C12H16 005676-29-9 2 Benzene, 1-(2-butenyl)-2,3- 'met 160 C12H16 054340-85-1 3 Benzene, 1-(1-methylethenyl)- 160 C12H16 005557-93-7 4 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydr - 160 C12H16 025419-33-4 5 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,5,7-tr 160 C12H16 006682-06-0 i~irickicir*:k*ir#,t**~F***ycic***ic***ic**~t****k*i,rtiF*****:FW*it******~t*ir**st*Yr****** Peak Number 37 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-... Concentration Rank 6 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.93 76.92 ug/L 4859870 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 1H- Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-dimet 146 - C11H14 006682-71-9 2 .al pha.,.be ta.,.beta.-Trimethyls 146 C11H14 000769-57-3 3 1H- Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-dimet 146 C11H14 006682-71-9 4 1H- Indene, 2,3-dihydro-5,6-dimet 146 ClIH14 001075-22-5 5 1H- Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-dimet 146 C11H14 006682-71-9 Peak Number 38 Benzene, 1,4-dimethyl-2-(2-... Concentration Rank 32 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Qual 72 70 70 70 70 Qual 95 93 93 93 93 Page: 17 eVei Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0535.D 12 Mar 2007 10:31 DR 07030507-02A SAMP;8260_W_GC 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.97 13. 38 ug/L 845053 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative D MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1,4-dimethy1 -2- -methy... 162 C12H18 055669-88-0 70 2 Benzene, 1,4-dimethyl-2-(2 ethy... 162 C12H18 055669-88-0 64 3 Benzene, 1,4-dimethyl-2-(2- thy... 162 C12H18 055669-88-0 58 4 Benzene, 1-ethyl-4-(2-methylp 162 C12H18 100319-40-2 49 5 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,3-dimethyl- 134 C10H14 002870-04-4 49 Peak Number 39 alpha.,.beta.,.beta.-Trime... Concentration Rank 5 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.02 84.48 ug/L 5337370 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qua1 1 .alpha.,.beta_,.beta.-Trimethyls 146 C11H14 000769-57-3 95 2 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-dimet 146 C11H14 006682-71-9 93 3 1H-Inderie, 2,3-dihydro-1,2-dimet 146 C11H14 017057-82-8 91 4 Benzene, (3-methyl-2-butenyl)- 146 C11H14 004489-84-3 91 5 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-dimet 146 C11H14 006682-71-9 90 Peak Number 40 Benzene, 1-(1-methylethenyl... Concentration Rank 47 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.10 5. 12 ug/L 23685 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1-(1-methylethenyl)- 160 C12H16 001129-29-9 70 2 Benzene, 1-(1-methylethenyl)-2- 160 C12H16 005557-93-7 70 3 Benzene, 1-(1-methylethenyl)-3-( 160 C12H16 001129-29-9 70 4 1H-Indene , 2,3-dihydro-1,1,5-tri 160 C12H16 040650-41-7 64 5 Benzene, 1-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4 0 C12H16 001746-23-2 64 Peak Number 41 Benzene, (1-methyl-l-butenyl)- Concentration Rank 15 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.1"2 48.90 ug/L 3089570 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual . Ur. t4 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 18 =j. Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial _ _ 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p 1 Benzene, (1-methyl-l-butenyl)- 146 C11H14 053172-84-2 78 2 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-1,2-dimet... 146 C11H14 017057-82-8 60 3 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-dimet... 146 C11H14 006682-71-9 53 4 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-5,6-dimet... 146 C11H14 001075-22-5 53 5 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-dimet... 146 C11H14 006682-71-9 53 Peak Number 42 Benzene, 1-methyl-3-(1-meth... Concentration Rank 29 V"~ R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.17 18.28 ug/L 1154720 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID - MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1-methyl-3-(1-methyl-2-... 146 - C11H14 052161-57-6 76 2 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-1,2-dimet... 146 C11H14 017057-82-8 76 3 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-... 146 C11H14 001559-81-5 76 4 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-... 146 C11H14 001559-81-5 76 5 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-dimet... 146 C11H14 006682-71-9 70 Peak Number 43 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrah... Concentration Rank 38 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.23 8.73 ug/L 551356 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro- 160 C12H16 025419-33-4 2 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,5,7-tri 160 C12H16 006682-06-0 3 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro- 160 C12H16 004175-54-6 4 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-1,4,7-tri 160 C12H16 054340-87-3 5 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-1,5,7-tri 160 C12H16 054340-88-4 Qual 76 76 74 74 74 Peak Number 44 Naphthalene, 1-methyl- Concentration Rank 9 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. - 8.27 69.85 ug/L 4413220 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# - 1 Naphthalene, 1-methyl- 142 C11H10 000090-12- 0 2 Naphthalene, 2-methyl- 142 C11H10 000091-57-6 3 1,4-Methanonaphthalene, 1,4-dihy... 142 C11H10 004453-90- 1 4 Naphthalene, 1-methyl- 142 C11H10 000090-12- 0 5 Benzocycloheptatriene 142 C11H10 000264-09- 5 Qual 96 96 94 94 94 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 19 a J Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260_W_GC ALS Vial 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Peak Number 45 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrah... Concentration Rank 41 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.32 6.10 ug/L 385427 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetra dro-... 174 C13H18 066324-83-2 47 2 Naphthalene, i-ethyl-1,2,3, tet... 160 C12H16 013556-58-6 40 3 Naphthalene, 5-ethyl-1,2,3,4- t... 160 C12H16 042775-75-7 35 4 Propanedinitrile, (2,3-dihydro- 196 C13H12N2 069564-96-1 28 5 1H-Indene, 1-ethyl-2,3-dihydro-1. 160 C12H16 056298-75-0 28 Peak Number 46 Naphthalene, 1-methyl- Concentration Rank 20 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.37 34.11 ug/L 2155150 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Naphthalene, 1-methyl- 142 C11H10 000090-12-0 96 2 Naphthalene, 2-methyl- 142 C11H10 000091-57-6 96 3 1,4-Methanonaphthalene, 1,4-dihy 142 C11H10 004453-90-1 94 4 Benzocycloheptatriene 142 C11H10 000264-09-5 94 5 Naphthalene, 1-methyl- 142 C11H10 000090-12-0 93 Peak Number 47 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrah... Concentration Rank 39 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.43 8.34 ug/L 526828 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative D MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetr hydro- 160 C12H16 004175-54-6 70 2 Naphthalene, 6-ethyl-1,2,3, -tet 160 C12H16 022531-20-0 64 3 Benzene, 4-(2-butenyl)-1,2-di et 160 C12H16 054340-86-2 60 4 Benzene, 1-(2-butenyl)-2,3-dime . 160 C12H16 054340-85-1 55 5 1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-b)pyridine, 2-(1- 160 C10H12N2 027257-18-7 52 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ********#**********************t**** Peak Number 48 Tetradecane Concentration Rank 36 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 20 Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial _ _ 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p 8.46 10.28 ug/L 649662 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Tetradecane - 198 C14H30 000629-59-4 91 2 Tetradecane 198 C14H30 000629-59-4 91 3 Tetradecane 198 C14H30 000629-59-4 91 4 Hexadecane 226 C16H34 000544-76-3 90 5 Tridecane, 7-propyl- 226 C16H34 055045-09-5 90 Peak Number 49 Benzene, 1-(1-methylethenyl... Concentration Rank 48 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.52 4.8 4 ug/L 3 931 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1 -(1-methylethenyl)-2- 160 C12H16 005557-93-7 49 2 Benzene, 1 -(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4. 160 C12H16 001746-23-2 46 3 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-1,1,3-tri... 160 C12H16 002613-76-5 46 4 Benzene, 1 -(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4... 60 C12H16 001746-23-2 46 5 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-1,1,3-tri... 1 C12H16 002613-76-5 46 Peak Number 50 Benzene, 1,3-bis(1-buten-3-... Concentration Rank 50 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.58 3.74 ug/L 236542 1,4-Dichlorobenzene- d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative I MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1,3-bis(1-buten- yl-)- 186 C14H18 158117-62-5 38 2 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-l,3- imet 146 C11H14 004175-53-5 27 3 1,4-Methanonaphthalen-9-ol, 2, 160 C11H120 055255-94-2 16 4 1,4-Methanonaphthalen-9-ol, 1,2, 160 C11H120 055255-94-2 16 5 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-1,2-dimet 146 C11H14 017057-82-8 16 Peak Number 51 Biphenyl Concentration Rank 58 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.63 .86 ug/L 117410 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Biphenyl 154 C12H10 000092-52-4 76 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 21 ~Er G nr. uI eau Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260_W_GC ALS Vial 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p 2 Naphthalene, 2-ethenyl- 154 C12H10 000827-54-3 74 3 Biphenyl 154 C12H10 000092-52-4 74 4 Biphenyl 154 C12H10 000092-52-4 72 5 Naphthalene, 2-ethenyl- 154 C12H10 000827-54-3 72 Peak Number 52 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrah... Concentration Rank 51 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.70 3.40 ug/L 214764 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Naphthalen , 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro- 160 C12H16 021693-54-9 49 2 Naphthalene 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro- 160 C12H16 020027-77-4 46 3 1H-Be ole, 2-(1-methyleth 160 C10H12N2 005851-43-4 46 4 Naphthalene, 2,3,4-tetrahydro- 160 C12H16 004175-54-6 46 5 1H-Benzimida zo , 2-(1-methyleth 160 C10H12N2 005851-43-4 43 Peak Number 53 Benzene, 1-(2-butenyl)-2,3-... Concentration Rank 49 R.T. Es Conc Area - Relative to ISTD R.T. - 8.72 4.6 ug/L 292772 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 ntative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1 -(2-b tenyl)-2,3-dimet 160 C12H16 054340-85-1 91 2 Naphthalene, 1,2, 4-tetrahydro- 160 C12H16 025419-33-4 91 3 1H-Indene, 2,3-dih dro-4,5,7-tri 160 C12H16 006682-06-0 90 4 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihy o-1,1,3-tri 160 C12H16 002613-76-5 90 5 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydr -1,4,7-tri 160 C12H16 054340-87-3 87 Peak Number 54 Naphthalene, 1-ethyl- Concentration Rank 31 ~►6i ~r 4- 1N R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.78 14.09 ug/L 890009 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Naphthalene, 1-ethyl- 156 C12H12 001127-76-0 95 2 Naphthalene, 2-ethyl- 156 C12H12 000939-27-5 95 3 Naphthalene, 2-ethyl- 156 C12H12 000939-27-5 95 4 Naphthalene, 1-ethyl- 156 C12H12 001127-76-0 94 5 Naphthalene, 1-ethyl- 156 C12H12 001127-76-0 93 •n. 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 22 Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0535.D 12 Mar 2007 10:31 DR 07030507-02A SAMP;8260 W GC 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Peak Number 55 Naphthalene, 2,7-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 26 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.88 21.01 ug/L 1327610 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Naphthalene, 2,7-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000582-16-1 2 Naphthalene, 1,6-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000575-43-9 3 Naphthalene, 2,7-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000582-16-1 4 Naphthalene, 2,3-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000581-40-8 5 Naphthalene, 1,4-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000571-58-4 * *************************'k**'A'**~V'*******'~C*9F'/C*****'k**Y[Sh 'IF 'k 'ff 'k ~l"JC**~'*~C Peak Number 56 Naphthalene, 1,7-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 30 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.95 17.11 ug/L 1080840 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Naphthalene, 1,7-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000575-37-1 2 Naphthalene, 2,7-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000582-16-1 3 Naphthalene, 1,5-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000571-61-9 4 Naphthalene, 1,6-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000575-43-9 5 Naphthalene, 2,6-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000581-42-0 Peak Number 57 Naphthalene, 1,6-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 40 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.99 8.20 ug/L 517787 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Naphthalene, 1,6-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000575-43-9 2 Naphthalene, 2,7-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000582-16-1 3 Naphthalene, 2,7-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000582-16-1 4 Naphthalene, 1,7-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000575-37-1 5 Naphthalene, 2,7-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000582-16-1 Peak Number 58 Naphthalene, 1,4-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 44 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 9.10 5.36 ug/L 338731 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 ual 97 97 97 97 97 Qual 9898 /C 97 97 96 96 Qual 97 96 95 95 94 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 23 .w- •1~ 6 ~w- IQw Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0535.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:31 Operator DR Sample 07030507-02A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial : _ _ 46 Sample Multiplier: 1 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Hit# of 5 1 Naphthalene, 2 Naphthalene, 3 Naphthalene, 4 Naphthalene, 5 Naphthalene, Tentative ID 1,4-dimethyl- 1,4-dimethyl- 2,7-dimethyl- 1,8-dimethyl- 2,3-dimethyl- MW 156 156 156 156 156 MolForm C12H12 C12H12 C12H12 C12H12 C12H12 CAS# 000571-58-4 000571-58-4 000582-16-1 000569-41-5 000581-40-8 Peak Number 59 Naphthalene, 1,3-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 57 Dual 96 95 95 95 95 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 9.20 1.90 ug/L 120001 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H - it# of 5 Tentative ID MW - MolForm - CAS# Qual 1 Naphthalene, 1,3-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000575-41-7 96 2 Naphthalene, 2,3-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000581-40-8 95 3 Naphthalene, 1,3-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000575-41-7 95 4 Naphthalene, 2,3-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000581-40-8 95 5 Naphthalene, 1,8-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000569-41-5 94 Y60 KAv •~Ir 1 Z u4~ 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:20:11 2007 Page: 24 ct~ 0-0 r'009a1~ tc . it HOUSTON LABORATORY 8880 INTERCHANGE DRIVE HOUSTON, TX 77054 (713) 660-0901 Client Sample ID MW-19 Collected: 03/08/2007 16:00 SPL Sample ID: 07030507-03 Site: Centennial, CO Analyses/Method Result QUAL MDL Rep.Limit Dil. Factor Date Analyzed Analyst Seq. # DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS MCL CO_DRO Units: mg/L Diesel Range Organics, C11- C28 0.45 J 0.041 1 1 03112/07 12:26 NW 3716479 Surr: n-Pentacosane 137MI % 0 % 21-130 1 03/12/07 12:26 NW 3716479 Prep Method Prep Date Prep initials 'iPrep Factor SW3510C 03/10/2007 14:24 LLL 1.00 D'Anna Stelly Project Manager Qualifiers: ND/U - Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit >MCL - Result Over Maximum Contamination Limit(MCL) J - Estimated Value between MDL and PQL D - Surrogate Recovery Unreportabie due to Dilution MI - Matrix Interference ` - Surrogate Recovery Outside Advisable QC Limits TNTC - Too numerous to count E - Concentrations exceeding Calibration range of Instrument B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank above Rep.Limit 3116/2007 2.40:57 PM HOUSTON LABORATORY 8880 INTERCHANGE DRIVE ® HOUSTON, TX 77054 (713) 660-0901 Client Sample ID MW-19 Collected: 03/0812007 16:00 SPL Sample ID: 07030507-03 Site: Centennial, CO Analyses/Method Result QUAL MDL Rep.Limit Dil. Factor Date Analyzed Analyst Seq. # V VL/1I ILC VR1.7/i1V 11.rJ 6T IYICIr7VL/ OLOUD MUL 5VVS1bU5 Units: U91L Benzene 0.15 J 0.053 1 - 1 - 03112/07 7:56 _ D R 3716124 Ethylbenzene 0.15 J 0.056 5 1 03/12/07 7:56 D -R 3716124 Gasoline Range Organics 5400 29 250 5 03/12/07 10:08 D R 3716126 Toluene 0.11 J 0.092 5 1 03/12/07 7:56 D -R 3716124 m,p-Xylene 0.12 J 0.08 5 1 03/12/07 7:56 D -R 3716124 o-Xylene ND 0.046 5 1 03112/07 7:56 D -R 3716124 Xylenes,Total 0.12 J 0.046 5 1 03/12/07 7:56 D -R 3716124 Surr:1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 93.8 0 % 71-140 5 03/12/0710:08 D -R 3716126 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 104 0 % 71-140 1 03/12107 7:56 D -R 3716124 Surr: 4-B romoflu oro benzene 99.6 0 % 70-130 5 03/1210710:08 D R 3716126 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.1 0 % 70-130 1 03112/07 7:56 D -R 3716124 Surr: Toluene-d8 96.6 0 % 61-121 5 03112/07 10:08 D R 3716126 Surr: Toluene-l8 99.4 0 % 61-121 1 03112107 7:56 D -R 3716124 D'Anna Steliy Project Manager Qualifiers: ND/U - Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit >MCL - Result Over Maximum Contamination Limit(MCL) J - Estimated Value between MDL and PQL D - Surrogate Recovery Unreportable due to Dilution MI - Matrix Interference - Surrogate Recovery Outside Advisable QC Limits TNTC - Too numerous to count E - Concentrations exceeding Calibration range of Instrument B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank above Rep.Limit 3/1612007 2:40:57 PM Data File U:\VOAI\070310A\107C0534.D~ Vial: 45 Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:08 Operator: DR Sample 07030507-03A Inst : MSDVOAI Misc SAMP;8260_W_GC Multiplr: 5.00 MS Integration Params: RTEINT.P Quant Time: Mar 12 10:42:48 2007 Results File: 1W030707.RES Sublist: spl lims.sub Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M (RTE Integrator) Title 8260 W Last Update Thu Mar 08 14:05:25 2007 Response via Initial Calibration ' DataAcq Meth 1W030707.M Compound R.T. QIon Response OnCo~ ug/L Dev(Min) Internal Standards 1) Pentafluorobenzene 3.32 168 522701 50.00 0.00 36) 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 114 771206 50.00 0.00 55) Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 82 378901 50.00 0.00 78) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 152 311946 50.00 0.00 System Monitoring Compounds 29) 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 3.27 65 355679 46.91 234.55 0.00 Spiked Amount 250.000 Recovery = 93.820 47) Toluene-d8 4.89 98 872855 48.32 241.60 0.00 Spiked Amount 250.000 Recovery = 96.64% 65) 4-Bromofluorobenzene 6.10 95 346451 49.81 249.05 0.00 Spiked Amount 250.000 Recovery = 99.620 Target Compounds Qvalue 2) GAS (TPH) 2.00 TIC 41163478m 1070.60 5353.01 34) Benzene 3.70 78 1876 0.03 0.14 81 48) Toluene 4.93 91 1578 N.D. N.D. 57) Ethylbenzene 5.68 91 1911 0.09 0.47 91 58) m,p-Xylene 5.77 91 1755 Below Cal Below Cal # 84 62) o-Xylene 5.94 91 874 Below Cal Below Cal 79 Target Compounds not in Sublist Qvalue 3) Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.00 85 0 N.D. N.D. 4) Chloromethane 1.03 50 340 0.04 0.19 97 5) Vinyl Chloride 1.07 62 135 Below Cal Below Cal # 1 6) Bromomethane 1.17 96 325 Below Cal Below Cal 57 7) Chloroethane 1.22 64 343 0.16 0.78 # 1 8) Trichlorofluoromethane 0.00 101 0 N.D. N.D. 9) Acrolein 1.43 56 1152 1.27 6.37 # 83 10) Acetone 1.47 58 417618 202.19 1010.97 75 't 11) 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.00 96 0 N.D. N.D. 12) t-Butyl Alcohol 1.67 59 9677 2.75 13.77 # 49 13) Acrylonitrile 1.68 53 275 0.30 1.49 # 6 14) Methylene Chloride 1.71 49 7802 0.08 0.40 92 15) Allyl Chloride 1.80 76 1478 0.86 4.30 # 58 16) Carbon disulfide 1.80 76 1478 0.09 0.47 99 17) Allyl alcohol 1.80 57 1473 12.90 64.48 82 18) trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.05 61 135 0.07 0.37 # 40 19) 20) Methyl tert-butyl ether 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.13 2.21 73 63 588 156 0.06 Below Cal 0.32 2 Below Cal 21) Vinyl Acetate 2.34 43 351 0.38 1.9 # 1 22) 2-Butanone 2.53 72 1119607 Below Cal Below C 8 23) Diisopropyl Ether 2.53 45 49552 1.49 7.4 # 6 24) cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.61 61 441 0.05 0.2 3 25) Bromochloromethane 2.71 49 417 0.11 0.54 # 17 26) Chloroform 2.78 83 1079 0.07 0.35 85 27) 2,2-Dichloropropane 2.84 77 120 0.15 0.73 # 1 28) Ethyl tert-butyl ether 2.88 59 190 0.11 0.53 # 43 30) 1,2-Dichloroethane 3.31 62 2610 0.33 1.66 # 44 31) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.40 97 163 0.16 0.78 # 1 32) 1,1-Dichloropropene 3.54 75 134 0.08 0.38 # 1 = qualifier out of range (m) = manual in tegration 107C 0534.D 1W030707.M Mon Mar 12 10:42 :59 2007 Page 1 a iA}a Z Data File U:\VOA1\070310A\107C0534.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:08 Sample 07030507-03A Misc SAMP;8260W_GC MS Integration Params_ RTEINT.P Quant Time: Mar 12 10:42:48 2007 Vial: 45 Operator: DR Inst : MSDVOAI Multiplr: 5.00 Results File: 1W030707.RES SubList: spl lims.sub Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M (RTE Integrator) Title 8260 W Last Update Thu Mar 08 14:05:25 2007 Response via Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth 1W030707.M Compound R.T. QIon - Response Oncol ugL Qvalue 33) Carbon tetrachloride 3.66 117 162 0.25 - 1.25 # - 83 35) tert-Amyl methyl ether 3.85 73 105 0.16 0.79 # 1 37) Dibromomethane 4.06 174 152 0.15 0.75 # 40 38) 1,2-dichloropropane 4.09 63 512 0.15 0.74 # 1 39) Trichloroethene 4.12 130 278 Below Cal Below Cal 70 40) Bromodichloromethane 4.14 83 453 0.22 1.10 # 82 41) 1,4-Dioxane 0.00 88 0 N.D. N.D. 42) 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 0.00 63 0 N.D. N.D. 43) cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 4.53 75 223 0.28 1.40 # 9 44) 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 4.64 43 1140 0.33 1.65 94 45) trans-1,3-dichloropropene 0.00 75 0 N.D. N.D. 46) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.84 83 258 0.11 0.53 65 49) 1,3-Dichloropropane 4.95 76 607 0.17 0.85 # 30 50) 2-Hexanone 5.06 43 133 0.72 3.61 # 28 51) Dibromochloromethane 5.07 129 123 0.30 1.49 # 1 52) 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.19 107 231 0.16 0.82 # 1 53) Tetrachloroethene 5.27 166 630 0.11 0.54 81 54) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.52 131 272 0.27 1.37 # 1 56) Chlorobenzene 5.58 112 742 0.04 0.21 4 1 59) Bromoform 0.00 173 0 N.D. N.D. 60) Styrene 5.92 104 222 0.15 0.73 4 1 61) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.90 83 21017 2.67 13.34 # 18 63) 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 6.00 75 221 0.04 0.18 # 44 64) Isopropylbenzene 6.10 105 1516 0.05 0.27 # 1 66) Bromobenzene 6.18 77 572 N.D. N.D. 67) n-Propylbenzene 6.29 91 2656 0.20 0.98 87 68) 2-Chlorotoluene 6.32 91 441 0.06 0.29 # 63 69) 4-Chlorotoluene 6.36 126 160 N.D. N.D. 70) 3-Ethyltoluene 6.35 105 1153 0.03 0.13 # 79 71) 4-Ethyltoluene 6.35 105 1153 0.03 0.13 # 79 72) 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 6.41 105 3796 0.29 1.43 95 73) 2-Ethyltoluene 6.46 105 1971 0.13 0.66 # 92 74) tert-Butylbenzene 6.52 119 341 0.03 0.15 # 85 75) 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 6.57 105 8464 0.47 2.34 93 76) sec-Butylbenzene 6.61 105 2253 0.10 0.52 # 72 77) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 6.63 146 329 Below Cal Below Cal # 25 79) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6.66 146 677 0.08 0.38 # 1 80) p-Isopropyltoluene 6.69 119 1291 0.16 0.79 89 81) 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 6.74 105 1757 0.13 0.63 # 85 82) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 6.80 146 260 0.04 0.18 # 37 83) n-Butylbenzene 6.86 91 7452 0.52 2.59 # 30 84) DBCP 0.00 157 0 N.D. N.D. 85) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.57 180 361 0.19 0.94 # 1 86) Naphthalene 7.68 128 1850 0.29 1.43 # 39 87) Hexachlorobutadiene 7.71 225 104 N.D. N.D. 88) 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 7.77 180 268 0.08 0.39 # 1 = qualifier out of range (m) = manual integration 107C0534.D 1W030707.M Mon Mar 12 10:43:00 2007 Page 2 "0 O O LT O O O eualeylydeN ouezuegoJolyoul4'Z'L ;'r O ~ M tl Ol 1. (iS o fi_O W auezueglAing-u I'4p-auozuagoJo14o10-b'L IJ l4 a 9 Q) >o 0 Q O Ln ()4 M O ~T Q 2: Ln LO o r.- ft r1 ?4 ~4 L0 0 r J.J 04 4 U J-1 (a -ri N G ~4 JJ JJ (g N Ul rl ~mj Qt C.' ~:3 O+ O l-+ 5:" S'auazuagoJonyowag•q - _ d'aueylaoJOlyoeJla-L-Z'Z' L' L auaJf41--_ O'auazuag1A413 1'gp-9u9zuogaoly0 S'gp-auenlol auezuegMONt, auezuaglFdOJd-u O O O eylaagy~eJlal-Z l t' L - - _ u-) L6 auaylaoJOlyoeJlal aueyleowagl0-Z' L eueylewwallpoel~rd ~ o euedoJdoJa of auoueluod-Z-IAgla W-6 auedwdaolyo!0-£' L-slo up Aa of o1Pow04TM W4 O Lo 4 i'ouazuogoJonylO-q'L Jagle-~Fylam7 yal- i =-E apuolyoeJlel uogmD l fO it-- LO cli auey48oJol4o!Jl-L'L'L ®,u lop 1 M aueylawaolyoowoJg U 18413 OdoJdossO O 00 h W N N O OD elelaay 16u1A r O H N / z o F~ O H O O .--i u w H'(Hd1) SbJ -O 1 rl 0 N N d M O h ~3: a' aPill~..~Ig@g4i8 O r O O O O 1 O co epuol~~ I N 1-4 O N ro auolaoy ------u Ia101~ i4 Ln co }.1 1 O MO •-M . l4 M QV QI aueylawgyD (d / O N r- G O rAOUl O N ~ " VlO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CD O O O O O O O O O " O T4 1 F r ~O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ' O ' ~O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O fo 04 u H CO U) O LO O Ln O LL) O LO O LA O Lo O LO N O 1.J l7' E U1 ZO r- O (D UD U) V V Cl) M N N E M Q~U) Q ~ 3 D:o Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0534.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:08 Operator DR Sample 07030507-03A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial _ _ 45 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Internal Standard--- TIC Top Hit name RT EstConc Units Response # RT Resp Conc 34 71920 1 . 2 3542400 50.0 Furan, tetrahydro- 3.07 1596.1 ug/L 22615700 1 3.32 3542400 50.0 Pentane, 2,2,4-tr... 4.00 8.3 ug/L 64424 2 3.90 1944880 50.0 Benzene, 4-ethyl-... 7.03 8.1 ug/L 66617 4 6.65 2056320 50.0 Naphthalene, 1-me... 8.28 9.8 ug/L 80725 4 6.65 2056320 50.0 a~. uy~ nhu `1x 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:16:06 2007 Page: 9 Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0534.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:08 Operator DR Sample 07030507-03A Misc SAMP;8260_W_GC ALS Vial 45 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Abundance 6000000 5000000 0.83 4000000' TIC: 107C0534.D 3000000! f 2000000 1000000' 1.47 Q3 fflEM(7ti98vr0"1.71 Time--> 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.2 Abundance TIC:107C0534.D 6000000 5000000: 4000000, 3000000 2000000 1000000 0151 3 Time--> 3.60 Abundance 4.89 5.56 3f,07 I i ~I 6.10 4.60 4.80 5.00 5.20 5.40 5.60 5.80 6.00 6.20 TIC: 107C0534.0 6000000' 5000000! 4000000: 3000000 6.65 2000000, 1000000 6.6.16556.61.6 ~BfIIa6b~46 7.5~~417Affi~~~.9~~8k~`.478ffi891®.9~1~e 0 -T Time--> 6.40 6.60 6.80 7.00 7.20 7.40 7.60 7.80 8.00 8.20 8.40 8.60 8.80 9.00 9.20 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:16:03 2007 Page: 6 3.89 -;;.v r. n._ eWa tai, 1 - ..t......-_.... ..-k- Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 10'7C0534.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:08 Operator DR Sample 07030507-03A Misc SAMP;8260 W GC ALS Vial 45 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Peak Number 1 Carbon dioxide Concentration Rank 2 R_ EstConc Area--- Relative to ISTD R.T. 0.83 245.03 ug/L 3471920 Pentafluorobenzene 3.32 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Carbon d xide 44 CO2 000124-38-9 4 2 Ethylene ide 44 C2H4O 000075-21-8 3 3 Carbon dioxide 44 CO2 000124-38-9 3 4 Nitrous Oxid 44 N20 010024-97-2 3 5 Nitrous Oxide 44 N20 010024-97-2 3 Peak Number 2 Furan, tetrahydro- Concentration Rank 1 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 3.07 1596.07 ug/L 22615700 Pentafluorobenzene 3.32 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Furan, tetrahydro- 72 C4H80 000109-99-9 91 2 Furan, tetrahydro- 72 C4H80 000109-99-9 78 3 1-Propene, 2-methoxy- 72 C4H80 000116-11-0 72 4 Oxirane, ethyl- 72 C4H80 000106-88-7 52 5 Oxirane, ethyl- 72 C4H80 000106-88-7 49 Peak Number 3 Pentane, 2,2,4-trimethyl- Concentration Rank 4 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 4.00 8.28 ug/L 64424 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Pentane, 2,2,4-trimethyl- 114 C8H18 000540-84-1 36 2 Acetamide, N-2-propenyl- 99 C5H9NO 000692-33-1 25 3 Heptane, 2,2-dimethyl- 128 C9H20 001071-26-7 17 4 1-Hexene, 4-methyl- 98 C7H14 003769-23-1 9 5 Acetamide, N-2-propenyl- 99 C5H9NO 000692-33-1 9 Peak Number 4 Benzene, 4-ethyl-1,2-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 5 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.03 8.10 ug/L 66617 1,4-Dicllorobenzene-d4 6.65 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:16:06 2007 Page: 7 Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0534.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 10:08 , Operator DR Sample 07030507-03A Misc SAMP;8260_W_GC ALS Vial 45 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Pit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, - 4-ethyl-1,2-dimethyl- 134 C10H14 000934-80-5 94 2 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,4-dimethyl- 134 C10H14 001758-88-9 91 b.. 3 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,4-dimethyl- 134 C10H14 001758-88-9 91 4 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth... 134 C10H14 000527-84-4 90 iya 5 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth... 134 C10H14 000527-84-4 90 Peak Number 5 Naphthalene, 1-methyl- Concentration Rank 3 R.T. EstConc Area - Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.28 9.81 - ug/L 80725 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 - Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Naphthalene, 1-methyl- 142 C11H10 000090-12-0 91 2 Naphthalene, 2-methyl- 142 C11H10 000091-57-6 91 3 Naphthalene, 1-methyl- 142 C11H10 000090-12-0 91 4 Naphthalene, 1-methyl- 142 ClIH10 000090-12-0 91 5 Naphthalene, 2-methyl- 142 C11H10 000091-57-6 90 +b•~ 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:16:06 2007 Page: 8 ll~. HOUSTON LABORATORY 8880 INTERCHANGE DRIVE HOUSTON, TX 77054 (713) 660-0901 Client Sample ID MW-20 Collected: 03/08/2007 16:10 SPL Sample ID: 07030507-04 Site: Centennial, CO Analyses/Method Result QUAL MDL Rep.Limit DII. Factor Date Analyzed Analyst Seq. # DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS MCL CO_DRO Units: mg/L Diesel Range Organics, C11- C28 4.2 0.082 2 2 03112/07 13:36 NW 3716481 Surr: n-Pentacosane 151MI % 0 % 21-130 2 03112/07 13:36 NW 3716481 Prep Method PreD Date :Prep Initials Prep Factor i SW3510C 103/10/2007 14:24 LLL 1.00 D'Anna Stelly Project Manager Qualifiers: ND/U - Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit >MCL - Result Over Maximum Contamination Limit(MCL) J - Estimated Value between MDL and PQL D - Surrogate Recovery Unreportable due to Dilution MI - Matrix Interference " - Surrogate Recovery Outside Advisable QC Limits TNTC - Too numerous to count E - Concentrations exceeding Calibration range of Instrument B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank above Rep.Limit 3/16/2007 2:40:57 PM lr~ HOUSTON LABORATORY 8880 INTERCHANGE DRIVE HOUSTON, TX 77054 (713) 660-0901 Client Sample ID MW-20 Collected: 03/08/2007 16:10 SPL Sample ID: 07030507-04 Site: Centennial, CO Analyses/Method Result QUAL MDL Rep.Limit Dil. Factor Date Analyzed Analyst Seq. # VOLATILE ORGANICS BY METHOD 8260B MCL SW8260B Units: ug/L Benzene ND 0.26 5 5 03112107 8:44 D R 3716125 Ethylbenzene 0.59 J 0.28 25 5 03112/07 8:44 _ D R 3716125 Gasoline Range Organics 7400 29 250 5 03112/07 8:44 _ D R 3716125 Toluene ND 0.46 25 5 03/12107 8:44 _ D R 3716125 m,p- yene ND 0.4 25 5 03/12/078:44 D_R 3716125 o- ylene ND 0.23 25 5 03/12/07 8:44 D R 3716125 Xylenes,Total ND 0.23 25 5 03/12/07 8:44 - D R 3716125 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 85.5 0 % 71-140 5 03/12/07 8:44 _ D R 3716125 Sum 4-Bromofluorobenzene 105 0 % 70-130 5 03/12/07 8:44 D_R 3716125 Surr: Toluene-d8 108 0 % 61-121 5 03112/07 8:44 D R 3716125 D'Anna Stelly Project Manager Qualifiers: ND/U - Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit >MCL - Result Over Maximum Contamination Limit(MCL) J - Estimated Value between MDL and PQL D - Surrogate Recovery Unreportable due to Dilution MI - Matrix Interference " - Surrogate Recovery Outside Advisable QC Limits TNTC - Too numerous to count E - Concentrations exceeding Calibration range of Instrument B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank above Rep.Limit 3/1612007 2:40:57 PM Data File U:\VOA1\070310A\107C0533.D Vial: 44 Acq On 12 Mar 2007 8:44 Operator: DR Sample 07030507-04A Inst : MSDVOAI Misc SAMP;8260 W GC Multiplr: 5.00 _ _ MS Integration Params: RTEINT.P Quant Time: Mar 12 09:57:59 2007 Results File: 1W030707.RES SubList: spl_lims.sub Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M (RTE Integrator) Title 8260W Last Update Thu Mar 08 14:05:25 2007 Response via Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth 1W030707.M Compound R.T. QIon Response OnCol ug/L Dev(Min) Internal Standards 1) Pentafluorobenzene 3.32 168 412904 50.00 0.00 36) 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 114 561776 50.00 0.00 55) Chlorobenzene-dS 5.56 82 312888 50.00 0.00 78) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 152 276790 50.00 0.00 System Monitoring Compounds 29) 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 3.27 65 253620 42.77 213.85 0.00 Spiked Amount 250.000 Recovery = 85.54°% 47) Toluene-d8 4.89 98 719157 54.18 270.92 0.00 Spiked Amount 250.000 Recovery = 108.370 65) 4-Bromoflucrobenzene 6.10 95 303914 52.51 262.54 0.00 Spiked Amount 250.000 Recovery = 105.02% Target Compounds Qvalue 2) GAS (TPH) 2.00 TIC 44005690m 1472.90 7364.48 34) Benzene 3.70 78 1167 N.D. N.D. 48) Toluene 4.92 91 1411 0.03 0.14 89 57) Ethylbenzene 5.68 91 2109 0.12 0.59 74 58) m,p-Xylene 5.78 91 2776 0.07 0.36 86 62) o-Xylene 5.95 91 1719 0.05 0.25 71 Target Compounds not in Sublist Qvalue 3) Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.00 85 0 N.D. N.D. 4) Chloromethane 0.98 50 574 0.16 0.79 99 5) Vinyl Chloride 0.00 62 0 N.D. N.D. 6) Bromomethane 1.21 96 120 Below Cal Below Cal 7) Chloroethane 1.22 64 866 0.51 2.54 # 8) Trichlorcfluoromethane 1.42 101 214 0.10 0.49 # / 9) Acrolein 1.43 56 1218 1.76 8.81 # 10) Acetone 1.47 58 451775 277.39 1386.97 75 11) 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.00 96 0 N.D. N.D. 12) t-Butyl Alcohol 1.67 59 9540 3.47 17.34 # 79 13) Acrylonitrile 1.65 53 139 0.28 1.39 # 41 14) Methylene Chloride 1.71 49 6484 0.11 0.55 89 15) Allyl Chloride 1.80 76 1238 0.90 4.48 83 16) Carbon disulfide 1.80 76 1204 0.10 0.48 # 59 17) Allyl alcohol 1.87 57 178 8.29 41.46 81 18) trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.07 61 156 0.08 0.40 # 29 19) Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.13 73 253 0.05 0.26 # 1 20) 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.21 63 184 Below Cal Below Cal # 45 21) Vinyl Acetate 2.32 43 219 0.38 1.88 # 22) 2-Butanone 2.53 72 582852 489.58 2447.92 5 23) Diisopropyl Ether 2.52 4S 23878 0.95 4.75 # 61 24) cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.61 61 565 0.08 0.39 97 25) Bromochloromethane 2.71 49 553 0.14 0.72 # 1 26) Chloroform 2.78 83 137 Below Cal Below Cal # 18 27) 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.00 77 0 N.D. N.D. 28) Ethyl tert-butyl ether 2.88 59 330 0.11 0.57 # 1 30) 1,2-Dichloroethane 3.34 62 945 0.22 1.09 92 31) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.39 97 117 0.16 0.78 # 1 32) 1,1-Dichloropropene 3.56 75 244 0.09 0.47 # - 1 = qualifier out of range (m) = manual integration 107C 0533.D 1W030707.M Mon Mar 12 09:58 :08 2007 Page 1 Data File U:\VOA1\070310A\107C0533.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 8:44 Sample 07030507-04A Misc SAMP;8260W_GC MS Integration Params_ RTEINT.P Quant Time: Mar 12 09:57:59 2007 1 Vial: 44 Operator: DR Inst : MSDVOAI Multiplr: 5.00 Results File: 1W030707.RES SubList: spl lims.sub Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M (RTE Integrator) Title 8260 W Last Update Thu Mar 08 14:05:25 2007 Response via Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth 1W030707.M Compound R.T. QIon Response OnCol ug/L Qvalue 33) Carbon tetrachloride 0.00 117 0 N.D. N.D. 35) tert-Amyl methyl ether 3.86 73 260 0.17 0.84 # 1 37) Dibromomethane 0.00 174 0 N.D. N.D. 38) 1,2-dichloropropane 4.09 63 570 0.18 0.92 # 1 39) Trichloroethene 4.12 130 165 Below Cal Below Cal 83 40) Bromodichloromethane 4.14 83 502 0.25 1.25 # 25 41) 1,4-Dioxane 0.00 88 0 N.D. N.D. 42) 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 4.48 63 182 4.60 22.98 # 54 43) cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.00 75 0 N.D. N.D. 44) 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 4.59 43 6820 0.76 3.81 # 39 45) trans-1,3-dichloropropene 0.00 75 0 N.D. N.D. 46) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.84 83 1511 0.46 2.31 # 6 49) 1,3-Dichloropropane 4.94 76 749 0.21 1.06 # 7 50) 2-Hexanone 5.07 43 1472 0.84 4.21 # 48 51) Dibromochloromethane 0.00 129 0 N.D. N.D. 52) 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.21 107 165 0.16 0.82 # 1 53) Tetrachloroethene 5.27 166 488 0.11 0.57 75 54) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.52 131 115 0.25 1.25 # 1 56) Chlorobenzene 5.58 112 622 0.04 0.22 # 24 59) Bromoform 0.00 173 0 N.D. N.D. 60) Styrene 5.91 104 432 0.16 0.82 # 10 61) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.90 83 9548 1.46 7.31 # 18 63) 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.99 75 167 0.03 0.16 # 1 64) Isopropylbenzene 6.09 105 7574 0.41 2.07 # 78 66) Bromobenzene 6.18 77 195 Below Cal Below Cal # 58 67) n-Propylbenzene 6.28 91 63878 2.81 14.07 97 68) 2-Chlorotoluene 6.33 91 7995 0.64 3.20 # 1 69) 4-Chlorotoluene 6.35 126 112 Below Cal Below Cal 70) 3-Ethyltoluene 6.35 105 87446 5.39 26.96 71) 4-Ethyltoluene 6.35 105 87446 5.39 26.96 97 72) 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 6.41 105 129009 8.11 40.54 9 73) 2-Ethyltoluene 6.46 105 63013 3.33 16.66 9 74) tert-Butylbenzene 6.52 119 946 0.08 0.41 85 75) 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 6.57 105 306635 18.47 92.33 97 76) sec-Butylbenzene 6.61 105 31326 1.66 8.32 # 51 77) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 6.63 146 412 Below Cal Below Cal # 1 79) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6.66 146 417 0.06 0.29 # 1 80) p-Isopropyltoluene 6.69 119 17384 1.16 5.82 91 81) 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 6.74 105 49123 2.76 13.82 82) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 6.80 146 260 0.04 0.19 # / 83) n-Butylbenzene 6.86 91 153289 9.79 48.96 # 38 84) DBCP 0.00 157 0 N.D. N.D. 85) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.57 180 520 0.22 1.10 # 1 86) Naphthalene 7.68 128 22330 1.08 5.38 94 87) Hexachlorobutadiene 0.00 225 0 N.D. N.D. 88) 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 7.76 180 265 0.08 0.41 # 1 = qualifier out of range (m) = manual integration 107C0533.D 1W030707.M Mon Mar 12 09:58:09 2007 Page 2 g:n ;F -o `0) i , i I O auazuagoio!g3!jl-VZ•L aualeylydeN au9zu9gmol4o!)1-t•'Z'l - o Cl N b'1 N a I'6P-au9zuogaolgolO-b't S'auazua( U S4 O H lQ4 9 v O x ao 0 Q o c t~~acn Cl) Ocq~ln o (0 r-i ?-I ~A O u z O r-I li -H J-) 04 J_J it -ri F- C" ~4 1J 1J (0 N U) ri aZ ZY O H ~v - I'SP-euez S'eP-auanlol I'9u9zuagaonylQ-y'1 auou eluad-Z-lA4la W-4 Jayla OUTA IRylaoiolyC)-Z euedadoJo!43lp-1 i ~ Lcr' M ' suey~eo~o!youl-l l t l n aua~oago I ~pqueme~ S vP eue 97amol yP4a Z l 9" r- LL Ca Ir o l ) layle IAog Uel I4413 C Cl M ~ L aueylewaolyoowmg U U~ C) 0 O t~ a ] N N O <t' alel83V IAu!n rl ~r H ~ z rI co O O H H'(Hdl) SVO N 00 la I04031jelN1V a N o h $ O O I P!AR4!PI 9 j _ yy~~aayy~~ aPP0184,~~0 : Qi O O O i O U) / N H O N (IS auolaay 41 N q! (4 ~4 U) CO ~4 O rto •-M S4 M Pa 14 aueylaoaol4D f0 r-I O co O d'9ue4l8wOJONO O U CD O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 ~ O O O O O O O 0 C3 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O A . 1-1 io O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (0 n 4 U H n, N O 00 Co V N O co (D 'Y N O 00 to It N O co CO -Ir N Q) O 41 W ~ V V V M M M Cl) M N N N N N - - - - - E M (d U M• r I U) Q F- o fq FC U) 3 BUOUBXGH-Z euedwdmo I - - ~O - - - - to Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0533.1) Acq On 12 Mar 2007 8:44 Operator DR Sample 07030507-04A Misc SAMP;8260_W_GC ALS Vial 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Abundance 3500000, 0183 I 3000000! 2500000; 2000000 I' 15000001 1.47 1000000' 500000 OffM02 0.S 0 Time--> 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1. Abundance 3500000. 3000000, 250000011 2000000! 1500000 3.90 1000000' 500000 3 S~3.79 4.004 10 4'T7 4 0 4 ~`~k~ 4.5a 0 3.5 8.32 39b, 4. kR352~ Time--> 3.60 3.80 4.00 4.20 4.40 4.60 Abundance 3500000, 3000000 2500000 6.65 2000000'' 7.03 1500000 6.57 6.8297 7.26 I i 1000000 a 7.24 r4n 6.41 680, 500000 6 93, 1 i 7~~i~ 15 7 6 6651~6.6%.~~ 76 6.89;10.1 Time--> 6.40 6.60 6.80 7.00 7.20 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:05 2007 TIC: 107C0533.D TIC: 107C0533. D 4.89 5.56 11 TIC:107C0533.D 3.07 3.32 3.27. 3.20 3.40 6.10 5.40 5.60 5.80 6.00 6.20 7.41 7^35,i .44 8.27 2p x,7.46 7 57626Z-77R 3 7.9.02 8.12 8.37 ,7.74 ..87 8.1(B8WG38.338aW.5EEmffl%A78 8.8 .6519.9 e 7.40 7.60 7.80 8.00 8.20 8.40 8.60 8.80 9.00 9.20 Page: 6 Piw 0 3.. t Mil l~ ~b•- w Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0533.D 12 Mar 2007 8:44 DR 07030507-04A SAMP;8260_W_GC 44 Sample Multiplier: Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p --Internal Standard-- TIC Top Hit name RT EstConc Units Response I# RT Resp Concl Carbon dioxide 0.83 268.4 ug/L 3234350 1 3.32 3012930 50.0 Furan, tetrahydro- 3.07 1022.2 ug/L 12316900 1 3.32 3012930 50.0 Hexane, 2-methyl- 3.67 45.4 ug/L 256506 2 3.90 1412350 50.0 Pentane, 2,3-dime... 3.71 27.4 ug/L 155063 2 3.90 1412350 50.0 Hexane, 3-methyl- 3.79 53.2 ug/L 300642 2 3.90 1412350 50.0 Hexane, 2,2-dimet... 4.00 82.8 ug/L 467627 2 3.90 1412350 50.0 Cyclohexane, methyl- 4.40 54.2 ug/L 306436 2 3.90 1412350 50.0 Cyclopentane, 1,2... 4.66 11.3 ug/L 64104 2 3.90 1412350 50.0 Pentane, 2,3,4-tr... 4.69 42.0 ug/L 237120 2 3.90 1412350 50.0 Pentane, 2,3,3-tr... 4.75 31.7 ug/L 245570 3 5.56 1937310 50.0 Cyclohexane, 1,3-... 5.15 11.4 ug/L 88716 3 5.56 1937310 50.0 Heptane, 2,6-dime... 5.36 13.3 ug/L 102934 3 5.56 1937310 50.0 Heptane, 2,5-dime... 5.41 11.3 ug/L 87691 3 5.56 1937310 50.0 Heptane, 2,6-dime... 5.62 39.8 ug/L 308473 3 5.56 1937310 50.0 Cyc1ohexane, 1,2,... 5.77 15.0 ug/L 116000 3 5.56 1937310 50.0 1-Docosene 5.79 12.4 ug/L 96129 3 5.56 1937310 50.0 Nonane 5.85 35.0 ug/L 271150 3 5.56 1937310 50.0 1-Octanol, 2-butyl- 5.98 16.7 ug/L 129195 3 5.56 1937310 50.0 Octane, 2,5-dimet... 6.02 10.1 ug/L 78468 3 5.56 1937310 50.0 Benzene, 1,2-diet... 6.80 59.0 ug/L 473842 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Benzene, 1-methyl... 6.93 46.4 ug/L 372528 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Benzene, 2-ethyl-... 6.99 89.6 ug/L 719573 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Benzene, 1-methyl... 7.00 74.5 ug/L 598446 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Benzene, 1-methyl... 7.03 146.3 ug/L 1175240 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Benzene, 1-etheny... 7.05 38.9 ug/L 312142 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Benzene, 1-methyl... 7.08 26.5 ug/L 212922 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Benzaldehyde, 4-(... 7.12 17.6 ug/L 141099 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Benzene, 1-methyl... 7.15 33.9 ug/L 272629 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 4-Methylphenyl ac... 7.18 9.4 ug/L 75426 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-... 7.24 62.3 ug/L 500768 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-... 7.26 120.4 ug/L 967252 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Benzene, 1-methyl... 7.29 35.4 ug/L 284490 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 1H-Indene, 2,3-di... 7.35 111.5 ug/L 895919 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Indan, 1-methyl- 7.41 107.6 ug/L 864189 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-... 7.44 69.0 ug/L 554167 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Benzene, 1-methyl... 7.46 43.3 ug/L 347956 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 2-Ethyl-2,3-dihyd... 7.83 31.5 ug/L 252653 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 1H-Indene, 2,3-di... 7.93 38.8 ug/L 311653 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 .alpha_,.beta.,.b--- 8.02 53.2 ug/L 427472 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-b)... 8.10 9.4 ug/L 75772 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 .alpha.,.beta.,.b... 8.12 27.7 ug/L 222640 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Naphthalene, 1,2,... 8.17 7.9 ug/L 63331 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Naphthalene, 1-me... 8.27 75.6 ug/L 607068 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Naphthalene, 2-me... 8.37 38.3 ug/L 307486 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Naphthalene, 1,5-... 8.89 10.9 ug/L 87777 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 Naphthalene, 1,3-... 8.97 10.0 ug/L 80645 4 6.65 2008190 50.0 •s - ^;sr sr. BL~g 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 Page: 21 Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0533.D 12 Mar 2007 8:44 DR 07030507-04A SAMP;8260 W GC 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Peak Number 1 Carbon dioxide Concentration Rank 2 R.T. Est Co c Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 0.83 268.37 u L 3234350 Pentafluorobenzene 3.32 Hit# of 5 Tent ive ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Carbon dioxide 44 CO2 000124-38-9 4 2 Ethylene oxide 44 C2H40 000075-21-8 3 3 Carbon dioxide 44 CO2 000124-38-9 3 4 Nitrous Oxide 44 N20 010024-97-2 3 5 Nitrous Oxide 44 N20 010024-97-2 3 Peak Number 2 Furan, tetrahydro- Concentration Rank 1 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 3.07 1022.17 ug/L 12318900 Pentafluorobenzene 3.32 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Furan, tetrahydro- 72 C4H80 000109-99-9 91 2 Furan, tetrahydro- 72 C4H8O 000109-99-9 78 3 1-Propene, 2-methoxy- 72 C4H80 000116-11-0 , 72~ 4 Oxirane, ethyl- 72 C4H80 000106-88-7 52 S Furan, tetrahydro- 72 C4H80 000109-99-9 50 Lr * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Peak Number 3 Hexane, 2-methyl- Concentration Rank 18 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 3.67 45.40 ug/L 256506 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm - CAS# Qual 1 Hexane, 2-methyl- 100 - C7H16 000591-76-4 87 2 Hexane, 2-methyl- 100 C7H16 000591-76-4 83 3 Hexane, 2-methyl- 100 C7H16 000591-76-4 59 4 trans-2,3-Epoxydecane 156 C10H200 054125-39-2 43 5 Pentane, 2,4-dimethyl- 100 C7H16 000108-08-7 43 Peak Number 4 Pentane, 2,3-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 31 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 3.71 27.45 ug/L 155063 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 page: 7 Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0533.D 12 Mar 2007 8:44 DR 07030507-04A SAMP;8260_W_GC 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Pentane, 2,3-dimethyl- 100 C7H16 000565-59-3 78 2 Pentane, 2,3-dimethyl- 100 C7H16 000565-59-3 78 3 Pentane, 2,3-dimethyl- 100 C7H16 000565-59-3 56 4 Oxirane, (1-methylethyl)- 86 C5H100 001438-14-8 53 5 1-Butanol 74 C4H100 000071-36-3 53 Peak Number 5 Hexane, 3-methyl- Concentration Rank 15 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. - 3.79 53.22 ug/L 300642 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Hexane, 3-methyl- 100 C7H16 000589-34-4 a. 90 2 Hexane, 3-methyl- 100 C7H16 000589-34-4 83 3 Hexane, 3-methyl- 100 C7H16 000589-34-4 80 4 Heptane, 4-methyl- 114 C8H18 000589-53-7 64 5 Pentane, 2,3,4-trimethyl- 114 C8H18 000565-75-3 64 Peak Number 6 Hexane, 2,2-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 8 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 4.00 82 .77 ug/L 467627 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Hexane, 2,2-dimethyl- 114 C8H18 000590-73-8 72 2 Butane, 2,2,3,3-tetramethyl- 114 C8H18 000594-82-1 72 3 Butane, 2,2,3,3-tetramethyl- 114 C8H18 000594-82-1 72 4 Pentane, 2,2,4-trimethyl- 114 C8H18 000540-84-1 72 5 Pentane, 2,2,4-trimethyl- 114 C8H18 000540-84-1 59 Peak Number 7 Cyclohexane, methyl- Concentration Rank 14 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 4.40 54.24 ug/L 306436 1,4-Difluorobenzene - 3.90 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Cyclohexane, methyl- 98 C7H14 000108-87-2 94 2 Cyclohexane, methyl- 98 C7H14 000108-87-2 90 3 2-Pentene, 3,4-dimethyl-, (Z)- 98 C7H14 004914-91-4 72 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 Page: 8 Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0533.D 12 Mar 2007 8:44 DR 07030507-04A SAMP;8260 W GC 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p 4 Cyclopropane, 1,1,2,3-tetramethyl- 98 C7H14 074752-93-5 59 5 3-Penten-2-one, 4-methyl- 98 C6H100 000141-79-7 53 Peak Number 8 Cyclopentane, 1,2-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 39 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 4.66 11.35 ug/L 64104 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 Hit# of 5 T 1 Cyclopentane, 2 Cyclopentane, 3 Cyclopentane, 4 Cyclopentane, 5 Cyclopentane, entative ID 1,2-dimethyl- 1,2-dimethyl-, 1,3-dimethyl-, 1,3-dimethyl- 1,2-dimethyl-, MW MolForm 98 C7H14 trans- 98 C7H14 cis- 98 C7H14 98 C7H14 cis- 98 C7H14 CAS# Qual 002452-99-5 53 000822-50-4 53 002532-58-3 53 002453-00-1 53 001192-18-3 53 Peak Number 9 Pentane, 2,3,4-trimethyl- Concentration Rank 20 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 4.69 41 .97 ug/L 237120 1,4-Difluorobenzene 3.90 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Pentane, 2,3,4-trimethyl- 114 CBH18 000565-75-3 90 2 Pentane, 2,3,4-trimethyl- 114 CBH18 000565-75-3 83 3 Pentane, 2,3,4-trimethyl- 114 CBH18 000565-75-3 78 4 Hexane, 3-methyl- 100 C7H16 000589-34-4 64 S Heptane, 4-methyl- 114 C8H18 000589-53-7 56 Peak Number 10 Pentane, 2,3,3-trimethyl- Concentration Rank 28 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 4.75 31.69 ug/L 245570 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID 1 Pentane, 2,3,3-trimethyl- 2 Pentane, 2,3,3-trimethyl- 3 Hexane, 2,3,4-trimethyl- 4 Pentane, 2,3,4-trimethyl- S Hexane, 2,3,4-trimethyl- MW MolForm 114 C8H18 114 C8H18 128 C9H2O 114 C8H18 128 C9H2O CAS# Qual 000560-21-4 80 000560-21-4 78 000921-47-1 56 000565-75-3 50 000921-47-1 50 Peak Number 11 Cyclohexane, 1,3-dimethyl-,... Concentration Rank 38 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 Page: 9 J1. n... LwK n-v q Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0533.D 12 Mar 2007 8:44 DR 07030507-04A SAMP;8260_W_GC 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 5.15 11.45 ug/L 88716 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Cyclohexane, 1,3-dimethyl-, cis- - 112 C8H16 000638-04-0 87 2 Cyclohexane, 1,3-dimethyl-, cis- 112 C8H16 000638-04-0 87 3 Cyclohexane, 1,3-dimethyl-, cis- 112 C8H16 000638-04-0 87 4 Cyclohexane, 1,4-dimethyl-, cis- 112 C8H16 000624-29-3 87 5 Cyclohexane, 1,4-dimethyl- 112 C8H16 000589-90-2 87 Peak Number 12 Heptane, 2,6-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 36 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 5.36 13 .28 ug/L 102934 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Heptane, 2,6-dimethyl- 128 C9H20 001072-05-5 90 2 Nonane, 2-methyl- 142 ClOH22 000871-83-0 72 3 Octane, 2-methyl- 128 C9H20 003221-61-2 64 4 Octane, 2,7-dimethyl- 142 ClOH22 001072-16-8 59 \ j 5 Nonane 128 C9H20 000111-84-2 k 53 Peak Number 13 Heptane, 2,5-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 40 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 5.41 11.32 ug/L 87691 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Heptane, 2,5-dimethyl- 128 C9H20 002216-30-0 72 2 Heptane, 2,5-dimethyl- 128 C9H20 002216-30-0 59 3 Heptane, 4-propyl- 142 ClOH22 003178-29-8 59 4 Heptane, 3,5-dimethyl- 128 C9H20 000926-82-9 58 5 Heptane, 2,5-dimethyl- 128 C9H20 002216-30-0 53 Peak Number 14 Heptane, 2,6-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 21 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 5.62 39.81 ug/L 308473 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 Page: 10 Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0533.D 12 Mar 2007 8:44 DR 07030507-04A SAMP;8260_W_GC 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W _ TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p 1 Heptane, 2,6-dimethyl- 128 C9H20 001072-05- - 5 87 2 Octane, 2-methyl- 128 C9H20 003221-61- 2 74 3 Octane, 2-methyl- 128 C9H20 003221-61-2 74 4 Octane, 4-methyl- 128 C9H20 002216-34- 4 64 5 Octane, 2-methyl- 128 C9H20 003221-61- 2 59 Peak Number 15 Cyclohexane, 1,2,3-trimethy... Concentration Rank 35 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 5.77 14.97 ug/L 116000 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Cyclohexane, 1,2,3-trimethyl-, 126 C9H18 001678-81-5 2 Cyclohexane, 1,2,3-trimethyl-, 126 C9H18 001839-88-9 3 4-Nonene 126 C9H18 002198-23-4 4 2-Nonene, (E)- 126 C9H18 006434-78-2 5 trans--4-Nonene 126 C9H18 010405-85-3 Qual 70 62 58 53 53 Peak Number 16 1-Docosene Concentration Rank 37 R.T. stConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 5.79 12.40 L 96129 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 H it# of 5 Tentati ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 1-Docosene 308 C22H44 001599-67-3 50 2 Cyclohexane, 1,2,3-trimethyl- 126 C9H18 001678-97-3 47 3 Cyclodecane, methyl- C11H22 013151-43-4 45 4 Cyclohexane, 1,2,3-trimethyl-, 126 18 007667-55-2 43 5 2,4-Pentadien-l-ol, 3-propyl-, 126 C8H 40 1000142-17-9 38 Peak Number 17 Nonane Concentration Rank 26 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 5.85 34.99 ug/L 271150 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Nonane 128 C9H20 000111-84-2 90 2 Hexane, 2,4-dimethyl- 114 C8H18 000589-43-5 53 3 Decane, 2,6,7-trimethyl- 184 C13H28 062108-25-2 50 4 Nonane 128 C9H20 000111-84-2 49 5 4,4-Dimethylcyclooctene 138 ClOH18 1000113-56-7 47 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 Page: 11 ,I - ti; Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0533.D 12 Mar 2007 8:44 DR 07030507-04A SAMP;8260_W_GC 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Peak Number 18 1-Octanol, 2-butyl- Concentration Rank 34 R.T. stConc Area - Relative to ISTD R.T. 5.98 16 67 ug/L 129195 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 1-Octanol, 2-b yl- 186 C12H260 003913-02-8 47 2 Hexane, 1-(he xyl )-3 -methyl- 200 C13H280 074421-18-4 47 3 Heptane, 2,4,6-tri thyl- 142 ClOH22 002613-61-8 43 4 Hexane, 1-(hexyloxy)- -methyl- 200 C13H280 074421-17-3 38 5 Ether, heptyl hexyl 200 C13H280 007289-40-9 37 Peak Number 19 Octane, 2,5-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 42 Cyr R.T. EstConc Area - Relative to ISTD R.T. 6.02 10 - .13 ug/L 78468 Chlorobenzene-d5 5.56 i% H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual - 1 Octane, 2,5-dimethyl- 142 ClOH22 015869-89-3 78 2 Heptane, 2,3,4-trimethyl- 142 ClOH22 052896-95-4 72 3 Nonane, 4-methyl- 142 ClOH22 017301-94-9 72 4 Pentane, 2,2,3,3-tetramethyl- 128 C9H20 007154-79-2 53 5 Heptane, 4-methyl- 114 C8H18 000589-53-7 52 Peak Number 20 Benzene, 1,2-diethyl- Concentration Rank 13 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 6.80 58.99 ug/L 473842 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1,2-diethyl- 134 ClOH14 000135-01-3 96 2 Benzene, 1,3-diethyl- 134 ClOH14 000141-93-5 90 3 Benzene, 1,2-diethyl- 134 ClOH14 000135-01-3 90 4 Benzene, 1,4-diethyl- 134 ClOH14 000105-05-5 90 5 Benzene, 1,3-diethyl- 134 ClOH14 000141-93-5 87 Peak Number 21 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-propyl- Concentration Rank 17 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 Page: 12 yy~~ 80 0 Pi a4g' ~ i 2 Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107CO533.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 8:44 Operator DR Sample 07030507-04A Misc SAMP;8260_W_GC ALS Vial : 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p 6.93 46.38 ug/L 372528 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-propyl- 134 ClOH14 001074-55-1 94 2 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-propyl- 134 ClOH14 001074-17-5 94 3 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-propyl- 134 ClOH14 001074-55-1 91 4 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-propyl- 134 ClOH14 001074-17-5 91 5 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-propyl- 134 ClOH14 001074-17-5 91 Peak Number 22 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1, 4-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 7 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 6.99 89. 58 ug/L 719573 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,4-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 001758-88-9 96 2 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth 134 ClOH14 000527-84-4 95 3 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth 134 ClOH14 000527-84-4 95 4 Benzene, 4-ethyl-1,2-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000934-80-5 95 5 Benzene, 1-ethyl-2,3-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000933-98-2 95 Peak Number 23 Benzene, 1-methyl-2 -(1-meth... Concentration Rank 10 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.00 74. 50 ug/L 598446 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth 134 ClOH14 000527-84-4 95 2 Benzene, 1-methyl-3-(1-methyleth 134 ClOH14 000535-77-3 91 3 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000095-93-2 91 4 Benzene, 1,2,3,5-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000527-53-7 91 5 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methyleth 134 ClOH14 000099-87-6 91 Peak Number 24 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-meth... Concentration Rank 3 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.03 146.31 ug/L 1175240 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000099-87-6 97 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 Page: 13 1'.y I%- Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0533.D 12 Mar 2007 8:44 DR 07030507-04A SAMP;8260_W_GC 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260 W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p 2 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000527-84-4 97 3 Benzene, 4-ethyl-1,2-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000934-80-5 96 4 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,3-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 002870-04-4 94 5 Benzene, 1-ethyl-2,3-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000933-98-2 94 Peak Number 25 Benzene, 1-ethenyl-3-ethyl- Concentration Rank 22 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.05 38.86 ug/L 312142 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1-ethenyl-3-ethyl- - 132 ClOH12 007525-62-4 91 2 Indan, 1-methyl- 132 ClOH12 000767-58-8 90 3 1-Phenyl-l-butene 132 ClOH12 000824-90-8 87 4 1-Phenyl-l-butene 132 ClOH12 000824-90-8 87 5 Benzene, 2-butenyl- 132 ClOH12 001560-06-1 86 Peak Number 26 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-meth... Concentration Rank 32 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.08 26.51 ug/L 212922 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylpro... 148 C11H16 001595-16-0 70 2 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000527-84-4 70 3 Benzene, (1,1-dimethylpropyl)- 148 C11H16 002049-95-8 70 4 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000099-87-6 70 5 Benzene, 1-methyl-3-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000535-77-3 70 Peak Number 27 Benzaldehyde, 4-(1-methylet... Concentration Rank 33 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.12 17.57 ug/L 141099 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Q ual 1 Benzaldehyde, 4-(1-methylethyl)- 148 ClOH120 000122-03-2 91 2 Spiro[4.4]nona-1,3-diene, 1,2-di... 148 C11H16 1000163-57-6 91 3 Propanal, 2-methyl-3-phenyl- 148 ClOH120 1000131-87-6 90 4 Benzene, 1-ethyl-3-(1-methylethyl)- 148 C11H16 004920-99-4 87 5 Benzene, 1-ethyl-4-(1-methylethyl)- 148 ClIH16 004218-48-8 81 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 Page: 14 +b- n_ a. .y.- .I,.-. _z~ac~a__ Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 10?C0533.D 12 Mar 2007 8:44 DR 07030507-04A SAMP;8260_W_GC 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method : U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260 W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Peak Number 28 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1 -meth... Concentration Rank 27 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.15 33.94 ug/L 272629 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000099-87-6 95 2 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000527-84-4 95 3 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,4-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 001758-88-9 94 4 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000527-84-4 94 5 Benzene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methyleth... 134 ClOH14 000527-84-4 94 Peak Number 29 4-Methylphenyl acetone Concentration Rank 45 R.T. Est nc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.18 9.39 ug 75426 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 4-Methylphenyl acetone 148 ClOH120 002096-86-8 50 2 Benzene, (1-methylbutyl)- 148 C11H16 002719-52-0 43 3 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(2-methylpro... C11H16 005161-04-6 42 4 Benzene, (1,2-dimethylpropyl)- 148 H16 004481-30-5 38 5 Nopyl acetate 208 C13 2 000128-51-8 36 Peak Number 30 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-tetramethyl- Concentration Rank 12 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.24 62.34 ug/L 500768 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000095-93-2 97 2 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,3-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 002870-04-4 96 3 Benzene, 1,2,3,4-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000488-23-3 95 4 Benzene, 1,2,3,5-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000527-53-7 95 5 Benzene, 1-ethyl-3,5-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000934-74-7 94 Peak Number 31 Benzene, 1,2,4,5- tetramethyl- Concentration Rank 4 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.26 120.41 ug/L 967252 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 Page: 15 I y.. t~ Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0533.D 12 Mar 2007 8:44 DR 07030507-04A SAMP;8260_W_GC 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p Hit# of 5 - Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000095-93-2 2 Benzene, 1,2,3,5-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000527-53-7 3 Benzene, 1-ethyl-2,4-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000874-41-9 4 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,4-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 001758-88-9 5 Benzene, 1-ethyl-3,5-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000934-74-7 Peak Number 32 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-meth... Concentration Rank 25 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.29 35.42 ug/L 284490 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylpro... 148 C11H16 001595-16-0 2 Benzene, (1,1-dimethylpropyl)- 148 C11H16 002049-95-8 3 Benzene, (1,1-dimethylpropyl)- 148 C11H16 002049-95-8 4 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,4-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 001758-88-9 5 Pyridine, 3-(2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (S)- 148 C9H12N2 000494-97-3 Peak Number 33 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4-me... Concentration Rank 5 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.35 111.53 ug/L 895919 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4-methyl - 132 ClOH12 000824-22-6 2 Indan, 1-methyl- 132 ClOH12 000767-58-8 3 Benzene, (1-methyl-i-propenyl)- 132 ClOH12 000768-00-3 4 Benzene, 1-ethenyl-4-ethyl- 132 ClOH12 003454-07-7 5 Benzene, (2-methyl-2-propenyl)- 132 ClOH12 003290-53-7 Peak Number 34 Indan, 1-methyl- Concentration Rank 6 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.41 107.58 ug/L 864189 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# 1 Indan, 1-methyl- 132 ClOH12 000767-58-8 2 1-Phenyl-l-butene 132 ClOH12 000824-90-8 3 Benzene, 2-ethenyl-1,4-dimethyl- 132 ClOH12 002039-89-6 Qual 94 93 93 91 90 Qual 81 72 64 59 59 Qual 90 81 81 74 72 Qual 93 93 91 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 Page: 16 t e_ 41~y Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107CO533.D 12 Mar 2007 8:44 DR 07030507-04A SAMP;8260_W_GC 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1WO30707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p 4 Benzene, 1-ethenyl-3-ethyl- 132 ClOH12 5 Benzene, 2-butenyl- 132 ClOH12 007525-62-4 90 001560-06-1 90 wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww,twwww*w*,r,twwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww Peak Number 35 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-tetramethyl- Concentration Rank 11 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.44 68 .99 ug/L 554167 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-tetramethyl- 134 ClOH14 000095-93-2 87 2 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,4-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 001758-88-9 87 3 Benzene, 1-ethyl-3,5-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000934-74-7 87 4 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,4-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 001758-88-9 87 5 Benzene, 2-ethyl-1,3-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 002870-04-4 87 *www;rw*wwwwww*wwwwwwwwwwwww*wwwwww**wwwwww*ww*wwwwwwwww*,t*www*w*www,tw Peak Number 36 Benzene, 1-methyl -4-(1-meth... Concentration Rank 19 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.46 43 .32 ug/L 347956 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 - Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylpro... 148 C11H16 001595-16-0 83 2 Benzene, (1,1-dimethylpropyl)- 148 C11H16 002049-95-8 78 3 Benzene, (1,1-dimethylpropyl)- 148 C11H16 002049-95-8 78 4 Benzene, 1-ethyl-2,4-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000874-41-9 72 5 Benzene, 1-ethyl-2,4-dimethyl- 134 ClOH14 000874-41-9 72 wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww Peak Number 37 2-Ethyl-2,3-dihydro-lH-indene Concentration Rank 29 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.83 31.45 ug/L 252653 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 2-Ethyl-2,3-dihydro-lH-indene 146 C11H14 056147-63-8 76 2 Benzene, 1-pentenyl- 146 C11H14 000826-18-6 64 3 Benzene, 1-pentenyl- 146 ClIH14 000826-18-6 52 4 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4-methyl- 132 ClOH12 000824-22-6 50 5 3a,6-Methano-3aH-indene„,3,6,7... 132 ClOH12 098640-29-0 50 / wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww**ww~wwwww~xw~wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww Peak Number 38 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-... Concentration Rank 23 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 Page: 17 .sy Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0533.D 12 Mar 2007 8:44 DR 07030507-04A SAMP;8260_W_GC 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 7.93 38.80 ug/L 311653 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-dimet 146 C11H14 006682-71-9 94 2 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-5,6-dimet 146 C11H14 001075-22-5 94 3 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-dimet 146 C11H14 006682-71-9 94 4 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,6-dimet 146 C11H14 001685-82-1 93 S .alpha.,.be ta.,.beta.-Trimethyls 146 C11H14 000769-57-3 93 Peak Number 39 alpha.,.beta.,.beta.- Trime... Concentration Rank 16 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.02 53.22 ug/L 427472 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 .alpha.,. beta.,.beta.-Trimethyls... 146 C11H14 000769-57-3 94 2 Benzene, (2-methyl-l-butenyl)- 146 C11H14 056253-64-6 87 3 Benzene, 2-ethenyl-1,3,5-trimethyl- 146 C11H14 000769-25-5 86 4 Benzene, (3-methyl-2-butenyl)- 146 C11H14 004489-84-3 83 5 Benzene, (1-methyl-l-butenyl)- 146 C11H14 053172-84-2 83 Peak Number 40 1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine, Concentration Rank 44 R.T. EstCon Area - Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.10 9.43 ug/L 75772 1, 4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative D MW MclForm CAS# Qual 1 1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine, -(1-.. . 160 C10H12N2 027257-18-7 64 2 Benzene, (2,2-dimethyl-l-met le.. . 160 C12H16 005676-29-9 60 3 Benzene, 4-(2-butenyl)-1,2-dim . . 160 C12H16 054340-86-2 55 4 1H-Inden-l-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,3- 160 C1111120 026465-81-6 50 5 Benzene, 1-(1-methylethenyl)-3-(.. 160 C12H16 001129-29-9 49 Peak Number 41 alpha.,.beta.,.beta. -Trime... Concentration Rank 30 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.12 27.72 ug/L 222640 1, 4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 Page: 18 U~ g b.- a.. Siy b.- ~n~ Data Path Data File Acq On Operator Sample Misc ALS Vial U:\VOA1\070310A\ 107C0533.D 12 Mar 2007 8:44 DR 07030507-04A SAMP;8260_W_GC 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\ METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p 1 .alpha.,.beta.,.beta.-Trimethyls... 146 C11H14 000769-57-3 81 2 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-dimet... 146 C11H14 006682-71-9 76 3 Benzene, (2-methyl-l-butenyl)- 146 C11H14 056253-64-6 76 4 1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-1,3-dimet... 146 C11H14 004175-53-5 76 5 Benzene, (1-met y1-1-butenyl)- 146 C11H14 r 053172-84-2 76 Peak Number 42 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrah... Concentration Rank 46 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.17 7.88 ug/L 63331 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-... 146 C11H14 002809-64-5 90 2 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-... 146 C11H14 002809-64-5 87 3 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-... 146 C11H14 002809-64-5 74 4 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-... 146 C11H14 002809-64-5 68 5 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-... 146 C11H14 001680-51-9 68 Peak Number 43 Naphthalene, 1-methyl- Concentration Rank 9 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.27 75.57 ug/L 607068 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Naphthalene, 1-methyl- 142 C11H10 000090-12-0 96 2 Naphthalene, 2-methyl- 142 C11H10 000091-57-6 96 3 1,4-Methanonaphthalene, 1,4-dihy... 142 C11H10 004453-90-1 94 4 Naphthalene, 1-methyl- 142 C11H10 000090-12-0 93 5 Naphthalene, 2-methyl- 142 C11H10 000091-57-6 91 Peak Number 44 Naphthalene, 2-methyl- Concentration Rank 24 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.37 38.28 ug/L 307486 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Naphthalene, 2-methyl- 142 C11H10 000091-57-6 97 2 Naphthalene, 1-methyl- 142 C11H10 000090-12-0 97 3 1,4-Methanonaphthalene, 1,4-dihy... 142 C11H10 004453-90-1 94 4 Benzocycloheptatriene 142 C11H10 000264-09-5 91 5 Naphthalene, 2-methyl- 142 C11H10 000091-57-6 90 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 Page: 19 , Data Path U:\VOA1\070310A\ Data File 107C0533.D Acq On 12 Mar 2007 8:44 Operator : DR Sample 07030507-04A Misc SAMP;8260_W_GC ALS Vial 44 Sample Multiplier: 5 Quant Method U:\VOA1\_METHOD\1W030707.M Quant Title 8260W TIC Library : C:\DATABASE\NIST02.L TIC Integration Parameters: Rteint.p * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Peak Number 45 Naphthalene, 1,5-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 41 ~F+ R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.89 10.93 ug/L 87777 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 6 Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Naphthalene, 1,5-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000571-61-9 94 2 Naphthalene, 1,7-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000575-37-1 94 3 Naphthalene, 2,3-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000581-40-8 94 4 Naphthalene, 2,7-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000582-16-1 94 5 Naphthalene, 1,3-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000575-41-7 93 Peak Number 46 Naphthalene, 1,3-dimethyl- Concentration Rank 43 R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T. 8.97 10.04 ug/L 80645 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.65 H it# of 5 Tentative ID - MW MolForm CAS# Qual 1 Naphthalene, 1,3-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000575-41-7 95 2 Naphthalene, 1,4-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000571-58-4 94 3 Naphthalene, 1,4-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000571-58-4 94 4 Naphthalene, 1,8-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000569-41-5 93 5 Naphthalene, 1,2-dimethyl- 156 C12H12 000573-98-8 93 • Lr L6 1W030707.M Thu Mar 15 13:12:36 2007 Page: 20 Quality Control Documentation 3/16/2007 2'40:57 PM ll.L. Analysis: Diesel Range Organics Method: CO DRO HOUSTON LABORATORY 8880 INTERCHANGE DRIVE HOUSTON, TX 77054 (713) 660-0901 WorkOrder: 07030507 Lab Batch ID: 65432 Method Blank RunID: HP_V_070312A-3716475 Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 03/1212007 10:31 Analyst: NW Preparation Date: 03/10/2007 14:24 Prep By: LLL Method SW3510C Diesel Range Organics, C28 Resu N lt~ Qual PRep Limio _ M o 0L -7 411 Surr: n-Pentacosane 98.2 21-130 0! Laboratory Control Sample/Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCS/LCSD) RunID: HP_V_070312A-3716476 Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 03/12/2007 10:54 Analyst: NW Preparation Date: 03/10/2007 14:24 Prep By: LLL Method SW3510C Analyte LCS LCS LCS LCSD LCSD LCSD Result I Percent Spike Spike Result Percent I Added Recovery Added I Recovery Diesel Range Organics, C11- C28 2.00 1.63 81.4 2.0 T 0' 1.62 81.( RPD !Lower Upper Limit Limit Limit 150 Qualifiers: ND/U - Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit MI - Matrix Interference E - Estimated Value exceeds calibration curve D - Recovery Unreportable due to Dilution J - Estimated value between MDL and PQL Recovery Outside Advisable QC Limits B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank N/C - Not Calculated - Sample concentration is greater than 4 times the amount of spike added. Control limits do not apply. TNTC - Too numerous to count QC results presented on the QC Summary Report have been rounded. RPD and percent recovery values 3/16/2007 2:40:59 PM calculated by the SPL LIMS system are derived from QC data prior to the application of rounding rules. Quality Control Report ATC Associates, Inc. Vail Samples in Analytical Batch: Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID 07030507-01B MW-24 07030507-02B MW-13 07030507-03B MW-19 07030507-04B MW-20 s- RAIUF ---I~ ' - Analysis: Volatile Organics by Method 82608 Method: SW8260B Method Blank RunID: MSDVOA1_070312A-3716119 Units: ug/L Analysis Date: 03/12/2007 2:15 Analyst: D_R Preparation Date: 03/1212007 2:15 Prep By: Method Analyte Result I Qual Rep Limit„ MDL Sum Toluene-0 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) RunID: MSDVOAI_070312A-3716 Units: ug/L Analysis Date: 03/12/2007 1:08 Analyst: D_R Preparation Date: 03112/2007 1:08 Prep By: Method Analyte Spike Added Result Percent Qual Recovery Lower ' Upper Limit Limit - Benzene Ethylbenzene 20.& i 20.0; 17.7 88.4; 22.0 110; 70~ 701 130, 130! Gasoline Range Organics 1750:. 1530' 87.4; 70 130 Toluene 20.0'; 20.2 1101 . 1 73, 130; - m,p Xylene 40.0' - 46.1 115; 70 130 o-Xylene 20.0 23.1 116; 70' 130! ,Xylenes,Total 60.0. 69.2: 115, 701 130 Matrix Spike (MS) ! Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Sample Spiked: 07030253-06 RunID: MSDVOA1_070312A-3716 Units: ug/L Analysis Date: 03/12/2007 2:38 Analyst: D_R Qualifiers: ND/U - Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit MI - Matrix Interference E - Estimated Value exceeds calibration curve D - Recovery Unreportable due to Dilution J - Estimated value between MDL and PQL Recovery Outside Advisable QC Limits B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank N/C - Not Calculated - Sample concentration is greater than 4 times the amount of spike added. Control limits do not apply. TNTC - Too numerous to count QC results presented on the QC Summary Report have been rounded. RPD and percent recovery values 311612007 240:59 PM calculated by the SPL LIMS system are derived from QC data prior to the application of rounding rules. Quality Control Report ATC Associates, Inc. Vail HOUSTON LABORATORY 8880 INTERCHANGE DRIVE HOUSTON, TX 77054 (713) 660-0901 W orkOrder: 07030507 Lab Batch ID: R194679 Samples in Analytical Batch: Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID 07030507-01A MW-24 07030507-02A MW-13 07030507-03A MW-19 07030507-04A MW-20 Z-4 0!7 Wr /'@" Quality Control Report ATC Associates, Inc. Vail Analysis: Volatile Organics by Method 8260B Method: SW8260B Analyte Sample ' Smp MS ! MS MS % ! MS MSD Benzene Ethylbenzene Gasoline Range Organics Toluene m,p-Xylene o-Xylene Xylenes,Total Result Qual Spike Result Added Rcvry Qua] j Spike Added NDi 20 18.5 92.71 20 0.189; JB 20 23.11 115 20 ND 17501 1590! 91. 1750 ND; 201 20.01 1001 20 0.156 J 401 48.6, 121' 40 ND 2025.1 1251 _ 20 0.156 5 J 650 1 73.7 123 r 60 HOUSTON LABORATORY 8880 INTERCHANGE DRIVE HOUSTON, TX 77054 (713) 660-0901 W orkOrder: Lab Batch ID: 07030507 R194679 MSD Result MSD MSD : RPD Rcvry Qual RPD RPD Low High Qual Limit Limit Limit 16.7i 83.41 , 10.5 20 67 202 21.6! - 107 6.64 20 49 165 1460 83.4 8.82 20 34 124 19.1 - 95.4! 4.79 20 48 162 ' 6 4.72 20 44 167 23.3 69.7; 11 l- - 116 7.18 5.55 20 54 158 20 44 167 Qualifiers: ND/U - Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit MI - Matrix Interference E - Estimated Value exceeds calibration curve D - Recovery Unreportable due to Dilution J - Estimated value between MDL and PQL ' - Recovery Outside Advisable QC Limits B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank N/C - Not Calculated - Sample concentration is greater than 4 times the amount of spike added. Control limits do not apply. TNTC - Too numerous to count QC results presented on the QC Summary Report have been rounded. RPD and percent recovery values 3116/2007 2:4059 PM calculated by the SPL LIMS system are derived from QC data prior to the application of rounding rules. Sample Receipt Checklist And Chain of Custody 3/16/2007 2:40:59 PM 0- 0 1- ' MAW HOUSTON LABORATORY 8880 INTERCHANGE DRIVE .mu.._, ® HOUSTON, TX 77054 (713) 660-0901 Sample Receipt Checklist Workorder: 07030507 Received By: RE Da te and Time Received: 3110/2007 10:00:00 AM Carrier name: Fedex-Priority Temperature: 3.0°C Chilled by: Water Ice 1. Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes © No ❑ Not Present ❑ 2. Custody seals intact on shippping container/cooler? Yes © No El Not Present ❑ 3. Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Present We 4. Chain of custody present? Yes EV:1 No 5, Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes ❑ No El 6. Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes W No El 7. Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes No ❑ 8. Sample containers intact? Yes C No ❑ 9. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes No ❑ 10. All samples received within holding time? Yes W No El 11. Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance? Yes 0 No ❑ 12. Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? Yes No ❑ VOA Vials Not Present ❑ 13. Water - Preservation checked upon receipt (except VOA')? Yes O No ❑ Not Applicable *VOA Preservation Checked After Sample Analysis SPL Representative:/ Contact Date & Time:l J Client Name Contacted: Non Conformance Issues:', Client Instructions:' 3/16/2007 2:41:00 PM S c F-- czs " . 0 0 rl ~ 00 J 4 rTz O ~ C o~ 0 r- 0 c T~ wo w n N ~ w~ a~ a~ nt x~ v A J u1 J Y~ ~ 1 v~ o f9 ° zx; np 3 S rij 2 ~ L ? y d VI W V ~ n _ y m a a ~ c a ~ o ` •-s p 3 Q y ~ ~ y r w 1 A ~r !L W=water S=soil*~ 0=oil c . SL=sludge X=othet~ y k z P=plastic A=amber glass o n L v G=glass V=vial X=other d d r = 1=1 liter 4=4oz 40=vial c ` 8=8oz 16=16oz X=other n 1=HC1 2=HN03 L 3=H2SO4 X=other 4~ Number of Containers C GAO ~ r b r ~ 3 e e ~ ~ c ~ `e rQ z N O zz January 4, 2007 Layton h CONSTRUCTING WITH INTEGRITY -RRM& Tom Kassmel Town of Vail - Public Works Department 1309 Elkhorn Drive nj ~~O 0 Vail, CO 81657 / In f Re: FOUR SEASONS RESORT - VAIL, CO Layton Construction Job Number 06320 Subject: Partial DPwatering Permit Building Permit # B06-0196 Dear Tom: We are in receipt of your email dated January 3, 2007 and offer the following in response: 1. Dewatering work schedule - Enclosed. 2. Traffic control plan - No traffic control will be needed for mobilization of the drill rigs. 3. Updated dewatering plan - Enclosed. Plans have been modified to show Discharge Line #2 connecting to Discharge Line #6 and flow to Spraddle Creek. Please do not hesitate to call me at (801) 563-4360 with questions and/or concerns. Respectfully, La ton Construction Company Doug Carley Project Manager- Enclosure DC/dc cc: Dave Brooks Mark Reed X44` c4 Layton Construction Company, Inc. 9090 South Sandy Parkway Sandy, LIT 84070 801.568.9090 Fax 801.569.5450 www.laytoncompanies.com Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 12364 W. Alameda Pkwy • Suite 115 • Lakewood, CO 80228-2845 www.KCE-Denver.com LAKEWOOD AVON/SILVERTHORNE (303) 989-1223 (970) 949-6009 (303) 989-0204 FAX (970) 949-9223 FAX November 17, 2006 Tom Kassinel Town of Vail Public Works 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail, CO 81657 Subject: Dewatering/Settlement Estimate Review Proposed Four Seasons Resort Vail Road and South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado Job No. 06-130 As requested we reviewed the information provided for the dewatering for the subject site and settlement estimates for adjacent buildings. The purpose of this letter is to provide our conclusions in regards to the proposed dewatering and settlement calculations. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical (H-P) performed a subsurface investigation and presented the results in the report Geotechnical Engineering Study, Job No. 105 291, dated June 22, 2005. The subsurface conditions generally consisted of 3 to 1 1 feet of granular fill underlain by relatively dense, stratified silty sand and gravel containing occasional zones of cobbles and boulders. Silty sand lenses, varying from 2 to 11 feet thick, were occasionally encountered. The proposed dewatering system has been prepared by Griffin Dewatering, LLC (Griffin). The locations of the dewatering wells are shown on Coggins & Sons drawing XBS-2, Sheet 2 of 8, dated 8/28/06. Griffin has also shown well configuration and estimated ground water elevations on a Cross Section Well Schematic drawing. Griffin has indicated an approximate static ground water elevation of 8140, well screens would be installed from approximate elevation 8145 to elevation 8100, and ground water would be lowered to an elevation of 8107. The proposed shoring system has been designed by Coggins & Sons, Inc. We reviewed Griffins dewatering plans and calculations and H-P settlement calculations. H-P estimated ground settlement for adjacent buildings based on the ground water being lowered 40 feet and the dense granular soil conditions encountered in their borings. They also assumed an average compression potential of 0.1% in their analysis. Their analysis estimates that a settlement potential of '/2 inch could occur. H-P also stated that their analysis is only for soil compressibility and any material removed or "dredged" during dewatering has not been " Tom Kassmel November 17, 2006 Job No. 06-130 Page 2 of 2 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC Consulting Geotechnical Engineers considered. We are in agreement with their method of calculating settlement and in general agreement with their settlement calculations. Since different assumptions can be made for soil criteria that would influence dewatering and settlement calculations, we have the following concerns for this site: 1. Greater depths of dewatering may occur in localized areas for vaults, grease pits, elevator pits, and the permanent dewatering system, which could influence a building in the proximity of these structures. The location and elevation of these structures should be indicated on plans so that the influence on adjacent buildings could be evaluated. 2. Localized subsurface conditions such as the layers of silty sand could influence settlement. The location and depth of these layers should be logged as the wells are installed and as the soils are excavated. 3. Subsoil conditions beneath buildings could be different than the subsoil conditions encountered beneath the site. This would influence the soil criteria assumed beneath buildings. 4. The dewatering is based on estimated ground water flow conditions and not on pump tests. The ground water cone of depression beneath adjacent buildings could be different than what is being assumed. 5. Wells will be naturally developed and not gravel packed with filter medium so some loss of ground is a possibility. 6. A monitoring program of buildings for settlement and sediment measurements of pumped water is planned. What is the alternate plan by the development team if monitoring indicates loss of ground or settlement of adjacent buildings? 7. Is a permanent dewatering system planned for the building? Will the long term dewatering influence settlement beneath adjacent buildings? If so, what is the design layout, and elevation of the pipes, sumps, etc.? If we can be of further service, please contact us. KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. C. 3 15962 o~;., !l l 7- 6) William H. Koechlein, P. ION A~Cxov President Reviewed By: Scott B. Myers, P.E. Senior Engineer (4 copies sent) cc: Jehn Water Consultants J ~ ~i ~~da~d oa _ sa ~ Z '1HS 8 ~Q ~ r~~,~ L£~ MMO uD1;aa0~ talanS a6,agas1a ~ f ,1tYt~ as; / sigl~ad 8£~ M,MQ ~::~?s<,~}~:~ ~ ~ ~J~ rr~~ pp'~~~ ~J~ IV pn 9 900Z'Da4 tiuit V • `oN aor F, u,~ 8~ G~ I o as u,uaMp W 1 wd6 pt o; 009 ;eeM wa} sseaatl 9~IS v ~ 9 eu1 e6anyasf0 I ! ~ ~ O Q ~ ~ ~ ~ -89t6- ~s~~a gippaadg peu6poe~ }a uol}ooa~ a;awlxo~ddy ~ ~J 1 Q ~ Mir ~ ~ ~ t~} ~ ~ . ~ sa~~ut, S1133M ~N(;~31tlM ~ 3Qtlaa aNr3 0 ~,,r C~ Nwnnoa ~naaa +~,r ~ ~ ~ 039n'IaNI a38wnN NWi .s ~ aa331o ti~ HIIM "1(tlN 1105 l~( L'49t8 * 12i3nHl SNld34 a13 ' £ 31aNNaIN S53a0a 3N11 r : tJ 1 ' V'~ ~ MMO p tv l9 l1tlM .Z l t " £'6918°'A313 daa ,er 3o doa ~ i ~ Q o; ata ,a da o9b a'9sts . 'nom o; 9 9 cut? o6~ayaslp daa .sa da d41 tz# t~nvn d ru~a [n! o t ~~t~~ 4,~~ 4~4aie = a r~,ati wda 99ti a; of •oete - • ~ 9 ~ eul-1 s6aogasl~ y .et ~ ~ S tZ iP hiMO 9 '95th m 13 4'L818 ~ Y9 310HNaYl 55380V yjBpiS Sf~ M~r7 4'tfit8 * 308 t 0L ~ Z3 6} b 4. ~ t 6 ~ . t k NY1n10a dn0bt! iinan a ~ tr9'9t4B ~4~ salts - 'nom lY~Y 'a'e daa ,e~ da da. na4idu.) eb ° aaa~ aNO 9a ~n aNYJ~aA N011'dAtl~X3 dD M31A N011tlA393 in4t+a~ as a, k~o ~vM situ a~aan~naa aa~ ~tlM w.nos s-seX sma 33s IY31SJ5 GNINpHS ~3t4N Z aN10tlN8 NQ4tlAtlaX3 3a M3)A NQL1tlA313 Ll~ h1h10 d013A3f1 ~4311tlM HihOS a3ddn 9-S8X aM9 33S 9' 948 'p 3 sKla , t~ ~~T 9•tsta ~ aas .sa ~ dot 9~ ~ r aNM~tlaa NouvndaX~ 3o M~~ NOU,tlA313 V 9-~S8X Jh10 33S A ~ 5z o3da~~n3q ao~ 17tlN~ is 3 1 t b IW 4-4' H1d30 aNU.0431YW 1/^~1 n Z 'N » , ~iFlyd1,~y ~y~1y~!' ~f ~J Y U f ~ Wit/1~ W ti{It1141~ f ir.~ aGN~a Q c~ ~ a wda nas a~ ae~ ~ aul'1 a6uayaslp I ~ --a ~ ~ ' x ~ ~~as ssd~ ~r~n~a Q3M0~~'d ~ •i~~M ~NI~ ~ C ~ ~ dwn~`s~Nb~~)1N~w~in~~ s~~n~ ~ ~ NQIII~NO~ flN ~3~N(1 C7 ~ ~ ,lA~/3H J~Nd ~11b'NS ~ ° C~ M ~ st;~ r~Ma • - ~7 C~ y 'ZStB * 'nom ~ 5 aaa .ak do drwl 1~ r ~ ~ ~ V ~ C~ # ~a " V ~ ~ wd9 0484 a~ Q49 ° SNI NWn10~ 1n0aa 9~Q.~~B sNiase NDltb°Titl1 ~ ~~n abaflyosia dS ~t7 NDliti~41 JNIISIX3 kd1~3A Q1313 }l33~0 31pA+d~ EU ~ 't"` dl4 0 48 OH 43 fl3 fl3 fl3 03 43 93 03 03 03 a3 93 fl8 fl3 08 _.m,_.. 03 03 lei 03 43 fld ------fl3 ~ a3 0 03 a3 C"Y948 * `n313 bGt d4a .6a 30 dol 11aM d '~W 8 N Mh1Q 8~ hVdO L~ MM Nouvattn43 4~4do~a g~~ ~4'~ an4ao ~6 $zt8 , wnoNxN 444 l,,nan dui ~1~ 1VYi'q'@ tuoN3'I tt ~ hbNQ 34 ~Nruta ~vnaad of N MMtl ~i { £t# MME ' ~1dN1~1~0 ~ at;M r~o . 3~filb"N~lS i _ a, gl1t~J~ 14N . _ 31d~ 1f10HlIM ~ 4 ~ 33 M~ 9"t8t8 ~ ' t` / ~ M3 dOtl «84 d0 / ~ 33 ~ M8 M3 M3 M M3 M3 N3 M3 n ~ M3 M3-, A3 , I, OL83` a ~ i MIS 6"gtl ° AM S /~l 344w ss3a0 ViHm n i ,ego ~g ~w CY a•ra~a m . da21 . d0 ~pLtB YOU NI 344Ntl S53aaY - - 1 6~9'ti vvN gas s 1fYN I= l3 ~NI 1~N~ ~ Layton'.t LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Layton Construction Co., Inc., 9090 South Sandy Parkway, Sandy, Utah 84070 (801) 568-9090 * Fax (801) 569-5450 TO: Building Department Town of Vail WE ARE SENDING YOU VIA: ❑ Pick Up F-] Mail Fx Delivery DATE: 13-Dec-06 JOB NO: 6030 ATTN: Charlie Davis RE: Four Seasons Permit # B 06-0196 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: COPIES DESCRIPTION 5 Staging plan showing Layton office trailer placement and power disconnect, parking, gates, etc. 11 We are only planning on setting thee[ trailer at this time. II THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: 0 For Your Use ❑ For Review and Comment ❑ Approved as Submitted ❑ Approved as Noted ❑ As Requested For Approval F-1 Returned for Corrections Rejected El See Remarks MARKS: Please call if more information is needed or if you have any question. Mark Reed 801-910-9094 DEC 13 2006 COPY TO: Project Files SIGNED: /,///7w Mark Reed, Project Superintendent 801-910-9094 'l / //lJl ////J//r////r/////////////////////////////// / / / / / //ir// / r / / / a/ioriyiiiH~oa~iaiai /yiio(f~~l((%/~aiHiiaoiraiaii///,(~!zii~~~. /qi/(iaioiaiimiiirar~/i/riaioai~iiraauaiaHiroiaiaioiiiaiiiaiaiiniiaiiiraiaiiaiiaiiiaiaiaiaiiamyiaiiiiiiaaiiroiaiaiiroaiamoaoiaavaoaiaiaiiaiiioaiaaauraiaaiaiaiiiorioiioioaiaiaHaiaiiioaaoarwaroiii ariYa6?6&9Y' r.~ i%g;~ 1 l s l%~//////N/%%///////////////i/u/i/////ii/I//iii/iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiirii~ii~iriiiiiriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiriiiiiiiiiiiiiii~uii.ii..iii..i..i.iii.........~ a r•, / ...I..., j:l:~y. ~ i bA,' '•p '.r; A..fl' r o tiv / ..f... ,,:y,. f r Y~Z~~ .y / 4,..., / N . , / , ; , / , , A, 9~ 9, ~,Y.... '~:.i:: 9W kY{R / "'^'+~Sui;,„.,,,, yY~.S ..iSh~``ty •nxe.k~S ~.'4i : v r>'(~~~ "~.6 .s,,,.a,. « £b'n+ yr ,:nrws':Yl/~ f f , rrr rr r„aac:a7,ryn ~ r~cryr~. ~ r.:s.. ~1;E / / . , ~ t / / • • r r U(~~Fl~~h., jr' , r„ i. ..a, r , , ~ 'G r.r.•. ~'~h4 t S t(•~• ;~~y%; <; / ;'t4s" t "`tlr f Vf`5; 4 r>,v..,;, A' . . ...,,......u.. s. ' . ~ / rv,,:.. / r , f , . f.F„,,,•v / a,./,r , , r w ~ , r...y~ a ' ~ Avg r `q;rrY„r t'°' :oi 'Sdd,i;t`55r i tS 4 d rof~y~4. . t . j crr..,..., •T •r 'k / r ~ r,.,„ . ,U, '>~w rs,NnyrbiuiH r 'yii~~~ :i7:'.I.~1{„ ?.l~~~r:f?^r> } /y„ S ~'l,.. ~ ~ ~ ~,Y,~NnMY y..7ii°,... ,Lj/.::Sr:> , ;L~;': iyy,, `I,. ' / ~ ~ ~ M/ /r pGh,y 5,...q,.i.e5r., /y... "':n. NKO!!,e•d...i;%...y > '„s. .a~„r, r` ..4.r::'i'.r rYN.~1):Y/ri}~... . ; y /z :.w~ rlXhbns4ii/ii1~• ~nyY'. ~av~r ' f... . rr .vo.. / , . f p . d.2.,..,,., ' ..r ' Cn...>,.. f' . , { ~y • r,rLd,'„( S.~ ~ ll ~riiirnhi uir ~$,a r ,.X ~ .F ' f f .,~...%,~s.~l i J3~tlXAk1 kti°AX'{..aiiL4i. M~#:, ..•.v.. ~~pH f . ~ r raniiirh~ y/~~~~/~/, f ti`AS, N2:adF,'JF!A~dS iT,'KW % y 3. / f . f,1XFttCaf ka #rt29 ~ , . ~~raarNi / ..a;:.f ' d , r,r/U,oa, .rot,. (..lr, 'J!.• ,b....,..... V~ / y . / t ;l i / r / : / / UUUrIWr!/r/rIr//r /r ' ' 4 , r ~ U rlhUrNh / . , r ' t f , . r I . .f ii ...r. r 4r. "`s / ! % 5 r~, .?9'rs.:. . , / . f ..,r' a f t,.w ' / , . na/ / / •.i ' ,....,.,,..v, ...r.',.t,`,~ . , L / ..,.,,....„...,,..y..,.w.,... , ,...,....J+ ~ % i . ; r Sf, S . ~ r ///U//ll/ Y %////1l/q r e . / 7` / , ~ / / rU/NLalaraU S S: k / L j rUiviriiir s;;(fr'i i:.4i~ r.. 9 ~ w ~ D ~ Jr / / u/ib c i flNfG~i. )f ~ ~ t ~ riiiiiiprrrii/pgri jk~r' {(i r t}SkL#:L ..,.,,..,,.„g , ~ % r /iiainrgainrovirr f % ~ ~ ridiairriiiaiiirin / ~ f y i / .rrrr/r i / ra./ / ''°y 4 f ~ / 7 / , . ~„vh„r/„prrF/r4mU Ur t , iiirir as / 1ana~/ar - r~r/l ri/nib l 1 ~ ~aHr yy pp ~ ~ miiiiviii //G ~ /,..)C~.~IIE~(~.~' ~ , 1 r / ~a ✓ ~ r;r y. ~ , / ,1 1 Y'' ~ ~ r y < , / / ~t ' / r _ „ u ~ t / y ~ ~t , . f St / i ~ Yr/n lruriiiq//ilq S Sil~r4~::.16Jt r 1 / f ruin tN~ vU.ba . /r ' ~ i rl.. c r/sir , f , f ~ ~ / , 'u y,. ~ •Hhrr; a , / .i ~ t ~ rv/irrv t ~ ~..r'.......... ~ ' . r - '~t ; ~ R~rs Kssrzn~»t rtS~wCPr~n, 4 ~ ~ rrrrnHhnr. / tbcYaxip ~u' ;E 5':k ~ f Of T, ~ 1 . f rr~ fi 4 3~u~ y ~ ~ _ _ / ~ ,..x`.(w/„,r„.~f. RkTFP;1~F: N0. ST.92 .y/.', ,t' ~irr ~ ~ # •7 f ~ ~ I r s' 4 r% ~ r / ,n~ s ' ~d41 , / i r ~y ~ G ' ~ ~ • r , / ' i;i.,t.• ~ ~riarr: S ~ y%'' "SSE'^%%1'ci: 9 r: ~ j y,.,,.,..., s, Lr . 7 ~ i / y y laiaa ~ ~ r//h/rJ/Y/y~ r /r/rFj r l / ,.Yi";'s~%t;;ior,,>y % .1,' ~ ,Vr~+% j ,J,. v/ / :T {'srsL i°!SP ~Ur 'rn rr/l f ~%':(:¢i„ `*G ' 1. r` .i aa/oirr/iaarra% / ',^K.,,,:w ' ; , y i~ i r t ~ f . / { f $ 19Xr ~ . r . ' /i • 3 , i : f i . . ~ ' . ' ,~i J ~ h.~ , , f nr, t:", r ~ i • r~. %aitrlrj; / ~ f r' . , ter, w+. t%• ~ ~ f , r r ' /1. £ i ~ / / r ri y'.. ~ ~ , , / / f ryi fS / r~ ~ r ' / ; . . r. j % ~1 /u'. ~ r % i :il • . ~ ' ~ r / ~y~' / !r ~v',' U'YU%hU / / ~r~~..., f j i . ~ Iffy r / ~ ~ yy ti.,,~//r rr/ / r/ r ~"l A ///nr/U r ~,rr~~~r l 7~• /F / r'^ , ry y~ rail/Jr nriirii ~/r/ J 7a ~ ~ fix.. •i ' r aii / Stets i F~ ,/~""r•~'an.~,y ! r (M ~ / 1 , / ,1.. ' X12' r~ t 2+Ya ' w ~ , a~~~ti ti',d , , ~ , ~ .(ivy i c ,r "~ir t >c~' 5; ~ y~ E t`. .r `Vs1t Y~. r., 'h1 .r~ ,Y ;.i~?as Sr~ M: r/ ti V - • j'- ~ fl`•~ ~ f ' f' r ~ r~~ / % r / ,r 1 / ~ Jt~~ '~,f w# 5~ l / ~ ~ ~ ~ r ' 1r , ~ c , • t3 A A ! ~C:~t • ,r~', ,r. ~ ;Sf. R 1 [ - ' ~ e. ~ .fir' ~ % ',t4~; A `7h'~/r i ~ . f' ti ` ctt.~maq. ~ / / ~ ~ / f• ,t ti s /,lw / > . 4), SS~ i 1 a r ~ ~ ~ '~i J rr t~ r , 5~ ~ ~ ~ } rat r f~ '~.,~k. t y y f / rr. t{ f - f ~ ~`a r r/ ~~•....,jt ~ t : 1 r / ~ wA%L. Fl~~ } r~ I it r I Ir'l~k., JJ/~f r / C. ~ i rr, r f '•t ~ rr r r s r r / Y . ~'f C C r C.. -a ! '•,a ~ ,r ~r~r i'y,.... •'w. r Y r. #17 W. w r„ MEADOW j r 1 DRIVE i f r% .1, GRAPHIC SCALE , I 9 30 Q 15 34 80 i 1 inch = 30 ft, M1 f / ! //ai r /liar ! //a/aiiaiaaa /Ni ! /a oa /aar / JNJ//!!r!!!!!!!I/!/J!l/I //////f//!!!/////!// / / !///////!!//!/!!/!/I//////!!/I/r ! rJ!! a / r ! NaNNlala NaaNraara aaaNaaliaiiJaaiJOla aaJiaN ! ! a aaaiaau Jii✓ai ! r aiaia Jai lailJaaaaalala J lJaaialiiaa ai ! ! ...............rr....r..,,.,r,rrrr.,.....r................,„r.,.......... TOWN OF VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2135 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ALARM PERMIT Permit A09-0005 X-) o . tit u? Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Status . APPROVED Location.....: FOUR SEASONS Applied 01/29/2009 Parcel No...: 210107101016 Issued . 04/28/2009 Project No Expires . 08/09/2009 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 01/29/2009 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT LUDVIK ELECTRIC CO 01/29/2009 Phone: (303) 781-9601 3900 S. TELLER STREET LAKEWOOD COLORADO 80235 License: 167-E CONTRACTOR LUDVIK ELECTRIC CO 01/29/2009 Phone: (303) 781-9601 3900 S. TELLER STREET LAKEWOOD COLORADO 80235 License: 167-E Desciption: CONDUIT INSTALLATION AND WIRE PULL ONLY FOR FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FOR FLOORS 1-3; PERMIT REVISED 3/25/09 TO INCLUDE REMAINDER OF FLOORS, 4-10. Valuation: $450,015.00 FEE SUMMARY Electrical > $0.00 Total Calculated Fees--> $17,107.56 DRB Fee--------- > $0.00 Additional Fees > $232.00 Investigation > $0.00 Total Permit Fee--------> $17,339.56 Will Call > $0.00 Payments > $17,281.56 TOTAL FEES--> $17,107.56 BALANCE DUE--------> $58.00 Approvals: Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 02/09/2009 mvaughan Action: AP Note. 1. Horn strobe shall ha ve word "fire", not a graphic symbol. 2. Wire type not shown . ..please clarify. 3. Pull stations shall be double action type. 4. BDA information requ ired. 02/09/2009 mvaughan Action: AP locations of devices subject to change bast changes and corrections if needed. 04/01/2009 mvaughan Action: AP fourth floor conduit and area 3a 3b on lev( 04/07/2009 mvaughan Action: AP approved for wire pull on 5,6,7. Condo unit typicals. Field address questions raised on condo units. 04/16/2009 mvaughan Action: AP approved remainder of floors for rough wire pull. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE SEVENTY-TWO HOURS IN ApV~CE ~Y~TEI EDKONX A,T 970-479-2252 FROM 5:00 AM - 5 PM. OF OWNER OR'CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER -a Project Street Address: 1 Vail Road (Number) (Street) Building/Complex Name: Four Seasons Resort Contractor Information: Company: Ludvik Electric Co. Office Use: Project (Suite Company Address: 3900 S. Teller St. City: Lakewood State: CO Zip. 80235 Contact Name: Adam Cressman Contact Phone: 303-501-4941 E-Mail acressman@ludvik.com Tow7ofV H CC ontractor Registration No.: 167-E / 829-S X /wa,C '2S- /0 9 Contractor Signature (required) i Building Permit Alarm Permit 10q. (3405 Lot Block # _ Subdivision: Detailed Description of Work: Conduit installation for Fire Alarm System. (use additional sheet if necessary) Does a Fire Alarm Exist? Yes( ) No ) Does a Sprinkler System Exist? Yes No( ) Work Class: - - - New Property Information ( " ) Addition ( ) Remodel ( ) Repair ( ) i 210107101016 & 019 Retro-Fit ( ) Other ( ) Parcel a (For parcel contact Eagle County Assessors Office at 970-328-8640 or € Type of Building: visit www.eaglecouty.us/patie) 'Single-Family( ) Duplex ( ) Multi-Family ( ) Tenant Name: Vail Village - Filing 2 Commercial( Restaurant( Other(.,) ) t ) ( ) Other Owner Name: Black Diamond Resort, LLC - - Date Received: Complete Valuation for Fire Alarm Permit: Fire Alarm $326,015.00 FIRE ALARM PERMIT Commercial and Residential Fire Alarm shop drawings are required at the time of application submittal and must included information listed on the 2nd page of this form. Application will not be accepted without this information. s Fire Department Process For Commercial & Residential Fire Alarm Systems Commercial and Residential Fire Alarm shop drawing requirements at the time of submittal must include the following: A Colorado Registered Engineer's stamp Device locations on reflected ceiling plans Reflected Ceiling Plans (RCP) Typical device wiring diagrams Battery calculations Battery calculations A list of specific device model numbers Equipment cut sheets of each type of device The number of each type of device Information indicating the specific zones Circuit diagrams Point to point wiring diagram Wiring type, size and number of conductors The source of AC power circuits Fire alarm panel locations Knox Box location - Information indicating monitoring method and monitoring agency Information regarding property managers and contact numbers j Owner's primary residence location and contact numbers -fInstructions for fire alarm system operations and an tions y pertinent code numbers for proper opera- This check list has been provided to ensure that our review process may be handled in a timely manner. I have read and understand the above listed submittal requirements: Project/Street Address: Contractor Signature: Date Signed: TOWN OF VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2135 VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ALARM PERMIT OWNER APPLICANT CONTRACTOR Desciption: SYSTEM Valuation: Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: FOUR SEASONS Parcel No...: 210107101016 Project No VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 LUDVIK ELECTRIC CO 3900 S. TELLER STREET LAKEWOOD COLORADO 80235 License: 167-E LUDVIK ELECTRIC CO 3900 S. TELLER STREET LAKEWOOD COLORADO 80235 License: 167-E 01/29/2009 Permit # Status Applied Issued . . . Expires . A09-0005 ISSUED 01/29/2009 02/10/2009 08/09/2009 01/29/2009 Phone: (303) 781-9601 01/29/2009 Phone: (303) 781-9601 CONDUIT INSTALLATION AND WIRE PULL ONLY FOR FIRE ALARM $124,000.00 *****+**++++*+++***********+*+*rt**rt*******+++*+++*++*****++++**+***+ FEE SUMMARY ***rt*++rt************++****+***+++*++**++*******++*+**++*++*+ Electrical > $0. 00 Total Calculated Fees--> $4, 882. 00 DRB Fee--------- > $0.00 Additional Fees > $0.00 Investigation > $0.00 Total Permit Fee--------> $4, 882.00 Will Call > $0.00 Payments > $4, 882.00 TOTAL FEES--> $4, 882.00 BALANCE DUE--------> $0.00 Approvals: Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 02/09/2009 mvaughan Action: AP Note. 1. Horn strobe shall have word "fire", not a graphic symbol. 2. Wire type not shown ...please clarify. 3. Pull stations shall be double action type. 4. BDA information required. 02/09/2009 mvaughan Action: AP locations of devices subject to change bast changes and corrections if needed. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL +rt***rt+++*rtrtrt*****rt**++*++**++*++**+*+rtrtrtrtrt*+*+*****+*+*++++++++++++*++*+++++++*rt*rt*rt**************rt++*+++++***+**+++++++*++++*++*****+**+++++*rtrt DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE SEVENTY-TWO HOURS 6,A0VANQE;.BYTELEPHONE AT 970-479-2252 FROM 8:00 AM - 5 PM. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R090000136 Amount: $4,882.00 02/10/200902:06 PM Payment Method: Check Init: DDG Notation: Ludvik 112357 Permit No: A09-0005 Type: ALARM PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: FOUR SEASONS Total Fees: $4,882.00 This Payment: $4,882.00 Total ALL Pmts: $4,882.00 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts BP 00100003111100 FIRE ALARM PERMIT FEES 4,650.00 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 232.00 Project/Street Address ! Contractor Information: Company: ,"z- Project _ 63 T f O Building Permit Glo-G1% Alarm Permit A6 49 Company Address: ~y~'G' ~r• J -0005 Detailed Description of Work^J~ city: State: Zip:. I Contact Name: r: Contact Ph: jO Cell: 3 r✓ E-Mail (b I (use additional sheet if necessary) : Town of Vail/Contractor Registration No.: r I X XX I Contractor Signature (required) IU6,~ r,5 fk~ ,VProperty Information _ Parcel#:/~/~1/fi/~%/(, Legal Description: Lot Block "It"14 Subdivision: Building/Complex Name:.- i - Owner Name: < (,zi/ J?e. ca LLB (For parcel contact Eagle Cgunty Assessors Office at 970-328-8640 or visit www.eaglecouty.us/patie) Value of Fire Alarm: (Labor & Materials) Work Class: New ( Addition ( ) Remodel ( ) Retro-Fit ( ) Repair ( ) Other( ) Work Type: Interior Exterior ( ) Both ( ) Type of Building: Single-Family( ) Duplex( ) Multi-Family( ) Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other ( 0' Does a Fire Alarm Exist? Yes ( ) No( Date Received: i Does a Sprinkler System Exist? Yes (V~ No( ) .,AIL A t4 A-0 T1Ut 2• , C49 Otte I ((J_; I l 77 r -11 JAN ~f Za(J I TOWN OF VAIL J g`6~ FIRE ALARM PERMIT Commercial & Residential Fire Alarm shop drawings are required at the time of application submittal and must include information listed on the 2nd page of this form. Application will not be accepted without this information.. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R090000290 Amount: $12,399.5604/07/200909:07 AM Payment Method: Check Init: LC Notation: 4113168/LUDVIK ELECTRIC Permit No: A09-0005 Type: ALARM PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: FOUR SEASONS Total Fees: $17,281.56 This Payment: $12,399.56 Total ALL Pmts: $17,281.56 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts BP 00100003111100 FIRE ALARM PERMIT FEES 12,399.56 TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ASBESTOS Job Address: 13 VAIL RD VAIL Location.......: 13 VAIL ROAD Parcel No....: 210107101016 Project No . ptJ o 3 - a~-Gs' OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT AMERICAN ABATEMENT, INC. 4340 BROADWAY DENVER CO 80216 License: 483-S CONTRACTOR AMERICAN ABATEMENT, INC. 4340 BROADWAY DENVER CO 80216 License: 483-S Permit ASB05-0016 Dvs oo'0 9- 06-6-- oto 0& Status ISSUED Applied 06/21/2005 Issued 06/27/2005 Expires 12/24/2005 06/21/2005 06/21/2005 Phone: 303-298-8550 06/21/2005 Phone: 303-298-8550 Desciption: REMOVE 750 SQ FT OF ACOUSTICAL CEILING MATERIAL INSIDE A FULL CONTAINMENT SYSTEM AS DESCRIBED IN COLORADO REGULATION #8. REMOVE APPROX. 309 PIPE FITTINGS INSIDE MINI-CONTAINMENTS USING GLOVE BAG METHOD. Occupancy: Type Construction: Type Occupancy: Valuation: $39,614.00 Add Sq Ft: 0 Fireplace Information: Restricted: # of Gas Appliances: 0 # of Gas Logs: 0 # of Wood Pellet: 0 FEE SUMMARY Building > $58.00 Total Calculated Fees--> $116.00 Plan Check $58.00 Additional Fees > $0.00 Investigation-> $0.00 Total Permit Fee > $116.00 Payments > $116.00 TOTAL FEES > $116.00 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0.00 Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 06/27/2005 mvaughan Action: AP See page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residentail Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE FORTY-EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE JW TELEP,90NE , T 970 479-2135 OR 970-479-2252 OF OWNER OR VONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF PAGE 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit ASB05-0016 as of 06-27-2005 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: ASBESTOS Applicant: AMERICAN ABATEMENT, INC. 303-298-8550 Job Address: 13 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 13 VAIL ROAD Parcel No: 210107101016 Description: REMOVE 750 SQ FT OF ACOUSTICAL CEILING MATERIAL INSIDE A FULL CONTAINMENT SYSTEM AS DESCRIBED IN COLORADO REGULATION #8. REMOVE APPROX. 309 PIPE FITTINGS INSIDE MINI-CONTAINMENTS USING GLOVE BAG METHOD. Conditions: Cond: 38 (BLDG.): THIS PERMIT IS GOOD FOR ASBESTOS ABATEMENT ONLY. AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT CERTIFICATE SHOWING THE AREA FREE FROM ASBESTOS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY FURTHER WORK OCCURING ON THIS SITE. IF FURTHER QUESTIONS ARISE, CONTACT THE VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT AT 479-2250. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Applied: 06/21/2005 Issued: 06/27/2005 To Expire: 12/24/2005 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R050000936 Amount: $116.00 06/27/200509:58 AM Payment Method: Check Init: LC Notation: #11337/American Abatement Permit No: ASB05-0016 Type: ASBESTOS Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 13 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 13 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: $116.00 This Payment: $116.00 Total ALL Pmts: $116.00 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 58.00 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 58.00 APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIGVE" O Project Building Permit Asbestos Permit c j/1 TOWN OF VAIL ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION 1~OWNOFVA& Required per Ordinance No. 19, Series of 1998 75 S. Frontage Rd. Permit application will not be accepted without the following: cation Vail, Colorado 657 1. C General Abatement Certificate and State of CoOda (970) 479-2139 o ritte e hefaciliryo fvary a of the air handl' em ire s in r system, alar e es tact phone FAX (970) 4 9-245 mb s s ndiv als. i In d waste co st rea do nd exiting of abatement ar its xiting r the occupants of the structure in unaffected areas. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION On Site Abatement Contractor: Town of Vail Reg. No.: Contact and Phone #'s: AFRICAN ABATIIVIENT, INC. 483-S Jim Oleskevich 302-298-8550 ~I E-Mail Address: elaine@americanabatement.com I Contractor Signature: I COMPLETE VALUATION FOR ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PERMIT (Labor & Materials) Asbestos Abatement: $ 3g, (o l 4-.,00 Contact Ea-qie Countv Assessors Office at 970-328-8640 or visit www eanfe-rnunty rnm for Parr_el it Parcel # SEE: ATTACF;D LEGAL DESCRIPTION - I II Job Name: CHATEAU AT VAIL I Job Address:l3 VAIL RD., VAIL, CO 81657 Legal Description Lot: Block: SEE Filing: ATI'AC HM I Subdivision: LEGAL DESCRIPTION I Owners Name: VEIL DEVELOPMETV'>~ Address: 50 S. 6 St. ,4 0 Minn -apol i . N 'T 55402 II Phone: 612-313-2500 I Project Manager: Michael. Address: 50 S. 6th St. #1480 Fraser I) M.innealoolis, AN 55402 I Phone: 612-325-8392 (Cell) I !I Project Designer: II Address: I Phone: i !I Air Monitodng Specialist: Doug I Address: 593 19.75 . C8 Rcl. 1503 II Phone 970-260-3341 f ~i ~~o r,- r„n ; i (Cell) Detailed description of work: iz=MOVe 190 5& t°r OF Acnusnc.&L- EE, -L1,44 ,4ATE AL- iitisir> A Fu L4- ('rw 4 weu 5-es-mft As DCSceztBEO 14Cot.-c.Rtee , Pamove ArPP_o),(_. 309 Pi Pc FiTn"45 tadSIDE M1tvi-eeNTAi~.f?gEtiTS t k Z, C-L.CVE OA&- A46 i PLEASE SeC A-rMcAeD -5TATF f-EF_-p-_mr r I r_>R4.ti1.v6S Start Date: 6-21-05 II End Date: 7_22_05 II Start Time: 7.00 a.m. I Quit Time: 3:30 12.m. !I Amount of Asbestos: Linear Feet: 309 Square Feet.- 750 55/Gal Drums: t.( A. I IClass: New Addition ( ) Remodel ( ) Repair ( } Demo Other ( ) II 'Ilk Work Type: Interior( ) Exterior ( ) Both II Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Two-family ( ) Multi-family ( ) Commercial ( } Restaurant ( ) Other b4 Aon:L_ II Does a Fire Alarm Exist. Yes( ) No( ) I L Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes( ) No( ) II *********t************FOR OFFICE USE ONLY*****x****x********x t \\Vail\data\cdev\FORMS\PERMITS\ASBEPERM.DOC ) 07/24/2002 TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES DEMO. OF PART/ALL BLDG. Permit D05-0006 Job Address: 13 VAIL RD VAIL Status ISSUED Location.......: 13 VAIL ROAD Applied.. : 06/28/2005 Parcel No....: 210107101016 Issued 07/22/2005 Project No ?R Yo j-<) 11(0-{ Expires 01/18/2006 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 06/28/2005 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT NICOLLET ISLAND DEVELOPMENT 06/28/2005 Phone: 612-332-1500 600 FOSHWAY TOWER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 CONTRACTOR T.R. CONSTRUCTION INC 06/28/2005 Phone: 719-574-0020 114 TROY HILL ROAD COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80916 License: 820-B Desciption: DEMOLITION OF EXISTING CHATEAU HOTEL Occupancy: Type Construction: Type Occupancy: Valuation: $350,000.00 Add Sq Ft: 0 Fireplace Information: Restricted: # of Gas Appliances: 0 # of Gas Logs: 0 # of Wood Pellet: 0 FEE SUMMARY Building > $2,393.75 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees--> $3,952.69 Plan Check $1,555.94 DRB Fee > $0.00 Additional Fees > $0.00 Investigation-> $0.00 Recreation Fee--------------> $0.00 Total Permit Fee--------- > $3,952.69 Will Call-----> $3.00 Clean-up Deposit > $0.00 Payments > $3,952.69 TOTAL FEES > $3,952.69 BALANCE DUE > $0.00 Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 07/11/2005 CDAVIS Action: CR Corrections list can be found with submitted documents 07/19/2005 cdavis Action: AP Corrections made Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 07/21/2005 George Action: AP Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/22/2005 mcgee Action: AP Contractor must not leave a dangerous pile of combustible waste, trash, debris or similar materials in such a way as to expose adjacent property to conflagration. Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 07/07/2005 is Action: AP Demo of gas station and Chateau. Allow for Construction fence to be installed around lot boundaries. See page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. If ~7 SIGNATURE OF OWNER CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF PAGE 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit D05-0006 as of 07-22-2005 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: Applicant: 07/22/2005 Job Address: Location: Parcel No: DEMO. OF PART/ALL BLDG. NICOLLET ISLAND DEVELOPMENT 612-332-1500 13 VAIL RD VAIL 13 VAIL ROAD 210107101016 Applied: 06/28/2005 Issued: To Expire: 01/18/2006 Description: DEMOLITION OF EXISTING CHATEAU HOTEL Conditions: Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R050001117 Amount: $3,952.69 07/21/200512:16 PM Payment Method: Check Init: LT Notation: Vail DevelopmentLLC / 1084 Permit No: D05-0006 Type: DEMO. OF PART/ALL BLDG. Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 13 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 13 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: $3,952.69 This Payment: $3,952.69 Total ALL Pmts: $3,952.69 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 2,393.75 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 1,555.94 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00 Jul 22 2005 7:32 TRCONSTRUCTION 7195740020 p.l T.R. CONSTRUCTION, INC. 114 TROY HILL RD COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80916 7 1 9 - 5 7 4 - 0 0 2 0 T E L 719-574-0021 FAX FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FROM: Permit Dept Chuck Turns COMPANY: DATE: Town of Vail 7/22/2005 FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 3 PHONE NUMBER: SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER: RE: YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER: ❑ URGENT ❑ FUR REVIEW ❑ PLEASE COMMENT ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ PI,F.ASE RECYCLE NOTES/COMMENTS: I have attached copies of service disconnect order for 13 Vail Rd, showing the date of disconnect. Chuck Tums, T.R. Construction Inc. 114 TROY HLLL RD. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80916 71o_S7A nn7n. Jul 22 2005 7:32 TRCONSTRUCTION 7195740020 Jul.22, 2005 8:20AM HOLY CROSS Na.3179 HOLY CROSS ENERGY Disconnect p.3 P. 2 Account 233014003 Map Loc: 5296002 ARE Service Order '122973 Job aesc; DEMOS HI G (FUTURE 41-SEASONS) Taken By. 129J1 Date Taken: 0711312005 Date Needed: 7/2012005 111/0 Cyc: 2 Home Phone: not on file ~L I Work Phone: i"M Mobile Phone; not on file Srv Dose; HOLIDAY INN 13 VAIL ROAD Subdivision: Blk: Service: OH Line.Srv Area: NONE ASSIGNED Dist: Trf Map Location: 5265030 Lot: Avon Office HOLIDAY INN Substation: Vail Feeder 4 CO ' Line Section: 48-0 County; Eagle Town : VAIL ._4_, it sacendarv Rate Mult 'Dials Lock Rind Seal S LVR Date LV Rdo KWH Rdg KW Ada Sear X 95670 64922966 63 80 5 N 8812005 10982 DO NOT BOOT CT METER 9fat Revn Trans Secondary Size Phase Bank # Load Mgt serial 0 Rate Cd _ LM Stat Load Type 2799 716002263 300 ABC 0 DCVice 9 Device Desc Desc Status Gon/RepaidDiVRom OK V 5- 1.1 i'5 Comments; JILL FAX FROM CHUCK WI TR CONST 7113105 APPLY DEP ON ACCT PLEASE DIS AND REMOVE SERVICE THEY ARE DEMOLISHING THIS HOTEL AND THE FOUR SEASONS WILL. TAKE ITS PLACE IN THE FUTURE Assessment/Fleld comments:. 1 Crew Name, Date: Meter Left? YEJ Retired Service?©N Print Date; 07113/2005 PrlntTime: 2:29:06 PM Form: DIS Last Printed: 0711312005 Last Printed to: HP40 Prior # of Prints: 1 Job Co Dieted: On Computer. Date: By: Date: BY Disconnect' Map Loc: $296002 Jun 23 2005 13:39 TRCONSTRUCTION 7195740020 P.3 Jun-Z3• ZUU~ l f:3oRM alPine en8ineerin9 Inc No 4i~1 v. 1 APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UN Project - d ~ J Building Permit TOWOFVA& OPVA B e its are r i RNf(T APPLICATION : - 7S S. Frontage R a, Olurtibing, mechanical etc.f Vail, Oolorado 8?6 , For Parcel # Contact Eagle County Asses Job Name: L LegalOescription Lot: Block.: Owners Name: Q G 2~ G Address Archite s)Wner• Addres Engineer. E x- Address: l or visit www. Job Address: Filing: Subdivision: 0(0-- 313-2 l4v~irr~ Work Class:. New( Addition( } Remodel - _ V ( ) Repair( ) Demo ( Other ( ) Work Type: Interior ( } Exterior ( ) Both Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes ( ) No _famUy { ) Two famil Y { ) Mufti ft~miiy ( ) Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( } Other ( ) Type of Bidirella No. of Exislling Units in this building: No. of Accommodation Units in this building: No/T a of s Existin : Gas A liances Gas Los Wood/Pe llet WooNoll E of es Prc>osed; Gas A fiances Gas Lo Wood/Pellet Wood Burnin NoT A LOWEd Does a Fire xist: Yes ( No ( } Does a Fire Sprinkler System )=xist: Yes(kl' No ( ) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY p e rrv ~ rg - r-P ~c~xri~r.~ii~= • - lnn~manl7 UN 2`Jo.7_ ).0,V ~UmrLt TE VALUATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMIT Labor $ Materials BUILDING: Lq,,'RV ELECTRICAL: $ OTHER:$ PLUMBING: S MECHANICAL : 5 T©TAL; S FINAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER TITLE POLICY ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 2005 [GAS STATION; PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO. 20107101019] PARCEL A: A PART OF LOT A OF AMENDED MAP OF SHEET 1 OF 2 OF VAIL VILLAGE, SECOND FILING, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A; THENCE SOUTH 79 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A, A DISTANCE OF 152.65 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT A; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A, A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 12 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 156.13 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A, A DISTANCE OF 110.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO. [CHATEAU HOTEL; PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO. 20107101016] PARCEL B: A PART OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND BEING A PART OF LOTS A, B, AND C OF AMENDED MAP OF SHEET 1 OF 2 OF VAIL VILLAGE SECOND FILING, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7; 39.20 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 6; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 100 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 47 SECONDS AND ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, 25.44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF VAIL ROAD, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE AFOREMENTIONED LINE AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A, 152.65 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE LEFT OF 100 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 47 SECONDS AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT A, 110.0 FEET; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE LEFT OF 73 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 12 SECONDS, 156.13 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF VAIL ROAD; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 73 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 12 SECONDS AND ALONG SAID WEST LINE 29.15 FEET; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 106 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 48 SECONDS, 156.13 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT A; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE LEFT OF 134 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 1 I SECONDS, 67.00 FEET; THENCE ON 97979.doc AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, 18.27 FEET; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE LEFT OF 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, 86.00 FEET; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 102 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 17 SECONDS, 101.50 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF WEST MEADOW DRIVE; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 38 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 30 SECONDS AND ALONG THE SAID NORTHERLY LINE 264.42 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 525.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 12 SECONDS, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 58.52 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT C; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 84 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 35 SECONDS AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT C, 251.25 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 6; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS AND ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE 300.00 FEET; MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 97979.doc Project Name: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL DEMOLITION DRB Number: DRB050310 Project Description: Participants: FINAL APPROVAL FOR THE DEMOLITION OF GAS STATION AND EXISTING HOTEL WITH REVEGETATION AND RESTORATION PLAN OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 06/28/2005 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 06/28/2005 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 Project Address: 13 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 13 VAIL ROAD Legal Description: Lot: 9- A Block: Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 2 Parcel Number: 2101-071-0101-6 Comments: SEE CONDITIONS BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Action: STAFFAPR Second By: Vote: Date of Approval: 06/28/2005 Conditions: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond:201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond:202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Planner: George Ruther DRB Fee Paid: $20.00 C: CD V ' O Cn W W N': N N N Ni N N N O (D co V': O Cn A; W. N Ni N' Oi CD O V' CA Cn A W N O; O Cp V; ~ O cn A' W - ' T CD CD m N c c c -D O T 00: O O 0 O 0 X 0 - - y Z a ~ 33 ' y a 3 31 m w Q m 3 m a fD a C7 a m, o ' s 3 3 m 3 y n a a z a m c c m o a o ° m n n p' 3 m. : o O o o = _ _3 m m . ° , m CA 2 nQ o m y - y o y d' o ' ° a a S o o p y d v y D m m' m m' m 3 1 - m 7r O m m m F N D o o m, m G: O (O m: Q G y m a O y O 7 y , (S v CD i m O y 7 O v y O 7 p) CD (O a O M : v Ch m m N v _ 7 O CD Q y: 0 U) O O m y y ° O y Q pi 3 a; o n 3 0 cu , 3' ° 3; ° m o on o m m 7 O CD CD CD (Q 0 O< 7 m O O Cp CD ;W CD N O d' 7 CD CD N C. @ C, a 3: - y 3 o - o '(3 p < -p CA ° D m p 7 : n cn r - CD m N m p O: y m 3 - m O p 3' 7 _ p o m =3 go' ' O m g =3 m' m ° o p ° m CD CD c -0' o - _ C m CD 0 (D D N D C CD - c m m m =3 CD O 3 I ~ I o ! N CD O V! W (n cn. N: N N, ;N CL m CL CL N N d: n ' CL CL CL N N N Q d CL d d N CL N n n Q Q ' d n C l. Q d d CL O7 d N N 6t ' 7 ~c i y ~ : 01 m y y K `G mac: su y y y : `G m `G m: v `G y `G w d m v y `G `G w: m m d m m v (n d . ~ : y y y O O: O T m m --iI < < CC CC m: T CD- O T T T C: O O: O O T m m m D 7 7 O.. C ' Q'. CL S' m C d m d Q: M. Q' . 7 O. p. M. C C T S CD O 7 J 7! CL: n d. O N ' ~ , V W -4 -4 W W (3) N: N N. m Q7 W W N CD O. W: W - C C\1 Cn CJ7'. (n 0, N' N N. N Cil N: (n N cn : C\71 t` CO Cn CA Cn A W! W V Cn CD A N O Vi V V O V W N A W W W W! O ao W OD O (n. O'. O O:. O (n'. Cn (n (n OI O O O Cn'. Cn'.. Cn (n O (n O' O O Cnl Cn (n:. O (n O' O O (n (n Cn' (n Cr OI O (nl 01, O O: O OI O- (n (n: (n (n (n O' (n: O (n O! O O: (n! U1 (n C T T T 3 7' T m < < T m m ' c T T T S c! O O O T: T S! S C! T = m: M. O. C . C O. Q m ' Q m d Q: O. CL: m O. M. O. C C T ~ S m 7 7: 3 O. O. C C m j CO ` W W; W Z4- Z:~J N` ~ + -4 N V ` + O' W W N C. m C W'. C\7 C\1: W (\1 (\1 (\1i C\7 m'. W iy '=r O . - - (A N (\I A c n: m N N - CD A W ` \ 01 \ W N N N N N A W W W N \ N O CD (D O O (n Y' O O- O / (n Cn- cn O O O: O U1: cn (nCn O cn O O (3 cn Cn C O O O O i O cn cn (n (n cn O: O (n (n O O O O O Cn cn U1 Cn' O1 C) (n: O (n O O O U1 Cn (A 0 O O O'. O O O OI OI O O O O: O O' O O O O O OI O O OI O OI O; O- O C) O CO p o o. o: o o o 0 0 0: o: o 0 0 0 D v v v v v v' v v a m m n<i n<i m! ° o<i v m w o<i v v v o<i X o CD 3 m m m _ 3 3 3 C m m m cn 3 3: 3 m 3 3 m _ _ - - - - CD 0 0 0 0 - - 0 CD - _ - - - i 0 01 O O:. --1 O O! O O ~1 0 ; M CD CD CD CD CD CD 0 m' 0. 0 0 CD CD CD CD , 0 0 0 m 0 m n O 0 n 0 m O O O o n 0 n O O O O n O f o O m m CD CD CD m C<D N n N (D m m m m Z O 'D m m 3 Z : = O» d w w m T 0) 3> - O 0. cT m o o o o 7 M '0 -p "O m 3 31 3 3 ER o o -0 -0 3 3 O 7 O O o 'O m v -p -p 3 3 3 3 N y Cp O U 3 o- o •LJ . •O 3 3 N 3 m 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0' o o ° n a n o! o o o o o n < o' d m m m m ' m m m m m, m ' 0 m m m , u rt 0 T cn 3' co W N:. N N N CO CA!. Cn W O co CO V co N', N (n (D N M (n (n : T CA T (b:. A W. T T T A A A T (n " T (n T (n d (n (n U) (n (n (n a (n (n (n (+n j T + + m C/), + C Q O O (n: (n d d O' O CL CL N C) Q N y Q CL y CL a) [u ; [U < y c N (n cn cn y! y "Z ^U) 0) cn 0 0 0 O T 0 ,--l- O LO O CV) ~ 6 V r # 1 lV V ` cn Q~ J Q r a J o d' N Z 3k v W~LO 0 U j (c, a w W ~z 00 ~N p X l z~ ~ ~a Ul I I I 01 ul CC - C m a ~ ~0 u. z S- -4 fU Q' O` 1 Lf1 C`- O a rn .a O IL + 0 O D `sir TOWN OF VAIL Vail Building Safety and Inspection Services75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2142 July 11, 2005 Revised 7/19/05 Vail Building Safety & Inspection Services Plan Review Corrections List Chateau Vail Hotel Demolition 13 Vail Road, Vail, Co 81657, BP #D05-0006 Owner: Vail Development LLC. Contractor: TR Construction Inc. # 820-B Town of Vail Responses are in Bold Corrections are listed below. Sheet Item 1/2 Provide a detailed construction schedule as to what will occur when. Examples: How long will this demolition occur? Is the debris from the demolition going to be removed as it is demolished? When is utility disconnection going to occur? Also it does not appear that all utility lines and disconnections are identified on the submitted documents. When is the final grading and landscaping of the site anticipated? This is just an example of questions that shall be addressed. Please provide a detailed schedule for all phases of the demolition activity. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 Missing Asbestos abatement program. Provide a complete environmental assessment of both structures identifying all elements of the building which contain asbestos or any other hazardous material regulated by the State of Colorado or the Environmental Protection Agency. A demolition permit will not be released until all asbestos abatement has been completed and a clearance report by a qualified agency is received by the Town of Vail showing that all elements of asbestos has been removed per the State of Colorado statutes. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 1/2 Is the existing foundation being removed? If so, provide an excavation plan showing limits of excavation. This shall include excavation depths. How is the excavation being shored? Provide an engineered designed and stamped shoring plan. This plan shall show how the foundation will be removed in a safe fashion reducing the risk of cave-in and assuring adjacent properties are effectively protected. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 1/2 The excavation shall be filled in according to the restoration plan. Quantities of fill material shall be identified for bonding purposes. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 TOWN OF VAIL Vail Building Safety and Inspection Services75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2142 July 11, 2005 Revised 7/19/05 Vail Building Safety & Inspection Services Plan Review Corrections List Chateau Vail Hotel Demolition 13 Vail Road, Vail, Co 81657, BP #D05-0006 Owner: Vail Development LLC. Contractor: TR Construction Inc. # 820-B Town of Vail Responses are in Bold Corrections are listed below. Sheet 1/2 Provide a detailed construction schedule as to what will occur when. Examples: How long will this demolition occur? Is the debris from the demolition going to be removed as it is demolished? When is utility disconnection going to occur? Also it does not appear that all utility lines and disconnections are identified on the submitted documents. When is the final grading and landscaping of the site anticipated? This is just an example of questions that shall be addressed. Please provide a detailed schedule for all phases of the demolition activity. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 Missing Asbestos abatement program. Provide a complete environmental assessment of both structures identifying all elements of the building which contain asbestos or any other hazardous material regulated by the State of Colorado or the Environmental Protection Agency. A demolition permit will not be released until all asbestos abatement has been completed and a clearance report by a qualified agency is received by the Town of Vail showing that all elements of asbestos has been removed per the State of Colorado statutes. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 1/2 Is the existing foundation being removed? If so, provide an excavation plan showing limits of excavation. This shall include excavation depths. How is the excavation being shored? Provide an engineered designed and stamped shoring plan. This plan shall show how the foundation will be removed in a safe fashion reducing the risk of cave-in and assuring adjacent properties are effectively protected. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 1/2 The excavation shall be filled in according to the restoration plan. Quantities of fill material shall be identified for bonding purposes. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 1/2 A grading plan shall be prepared, designed and sealed by a Colorado registered engineering professional. Additional drawings have been received sealed by Colorado Registered Engineer 7/19/05. 1/2 An erosion control plan shall be prepared, designed and sealed by a Colorado registered engineering professional. The plans have been submitted; however the Colorado Registered Professional stamp is missing. Additional drawings have been received sealed by Colorado Registered Engineer 7/19/05. The above referenced permit shall not be released and has been rejected. The above mentioned corrections shall be addressed in a future submittal. Be aware that corrections from other departments shall also be addressed and the future submittal shall address all corrections from all Town departments. Plans Examiner/ Building Official: Charlie Davis 1/2 A grading plan shall be prepared, designed and sealed by a Colorado registered engineering professional. Additional drawings have been received sealed by Colorado Registered Engineer 7/19/05. 1/2 An erosion control plan shall be prepared, designed and sealed by a Colorado registered engineering professional. The plans have been submitted; however the Colorado Registered Professional stamp is missing. Additional drawings have been received sealed by Colorado Registered Engineer 7/19/05. The above referenced permit shall not be released and has been rejected. The above mentioned corrections shall be addressed in a future submittal. Be aware that corrections from other departments shall also be addressed and the future submittal shall address all corrections from all Town departments. Plans Examiner/ Building Official: Charlie Davis co`O9 DEMOLITION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM He A $55 FEE MUST ACCOMPANY THIS FORM. * * INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL BE RETURNED. * 1876 (Permit will be mailed to demolition contractor unless specified otherwise) Submit form to: Permit Coordinator Colorado Dept. of Public Health and Environment APCD-SS-B1 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 Phone: 303-692-3100 Fax: 303-782-0278 ` Company Name Building Name Year Constructed s , 2. G o to =1 fz- L) Aea q. 43 Street Type of Building (i.e. residential, warehouse, office building, etc.) Jt y i ~o i~L f~-FJ y v~el O City State Zip Code ' C Street 2 d r o C~larca-n~SP~~N- co o91~6 f 0 J m 13 ad Telephone With Area Code City State County Zip Code r) 1 4) O Project Manager Cell Phone Number with Area Code Proposed Start Date Proposed Completion Date ° -4V ck i2/v C) 33j 331 q-22-CD5 Landfill Name Owner's Name d S V i~ i l T1/ VQ A-sTE i=4,-/ L, L L V 41 Z 13 E ✓ E LO i-vt ,OV-T 4- N Street 3 Q. Street (o .3 q t. P►'v O Ft L L l2 O d 5-cl S o H S I y-T1~ S i. S t Zi C d C City State Zip Code - C City ta e p o e " N 0111 LI 3S 0 0 M (N tv C PN P C) L-" Y~ N S S Ya p Telephone With Area Code m O Telephone With Area Code qh0 - `l(o g- C/Z(~~ col Z- -;13-- Z Soo Inspectoes name "'Note: Signature is required below- Gener I Abatement Contractor (GAC N 00"a Ct 5e a mP~ C ~ O r+ Address 3 q 31I-Z > E5 CDPHE tos Permit Number L-FKg0 D ,7 ZSSq a o 0 v Ciry State C Zip Code Ij V Total Quantity o Asbestos Removed - z- H rr o 0 v f Zo I-F TsT -175 0 -P 4-- = Colo. Cert. Number Expiration D r 4 y O " Date Removal Completed 30 0-s z 7- N i as t) Date(s) of Insp s Z jkjj s ectioGds - Telephone With Ar Code (3 70 -2'f I-Oeo Q Telephone With Area Code -3 2~( 9550 With my signature below, I certify that I possess current AHERA and state of Colorado certification as an Asbestos Building Inspector. I also certify that I 1 verify that all refrigerants from air conditioning/refrigeration appliances have have inspected the building to be demolished, as listed In the Demolition Site been properly recovered in accordance with AQCC Regulation No. 15.(For block above, sampled all suspect materials (in accordance with AHERA), had ` Information on CFC requirements call 692-3100). all samples analyzed for the presence of asbestos by a NVLAP accredited O V laboratory, and have determined that (check appropriate box and sign in t; CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX: d BLUE INK): ` = . C X No ACM exists anywhere In the building. V Building Owner to O The only ACM left in the building is non-friable VAT and/or tar-impregnated O OR N V roofing felt and these will remain non-friable during demolition. 11 4) N :E All friable ACM, or ACM that may be rendered friable during demolition, that 1 f d h - 01 oun as been completely removed from this building, per my visual 3 Contractor Q V inspection. O d Date of Final Inspection qos Date 1 ZO o~ U Signature - 3 Signature A , 2^ Printed Name ` Printed Name 4 C C J2- THIS BOX IS FOR CDPHE USE ONLY: Permit Postmark or Hand Delivery Date: Check Issued: Rev.3/03, JAAsbestos and Lead Units'Asbeslos FormsWSBESTOS ABATEMENT NOTIFICATION.doc RECEIVED JUL 2 0 2005 TOWCOMMEV. 1 o" e O / `S Environmental Consultants Asbestos Building Materials Inspection Services Project Site: Chateau At Vail, Vail, Colorado Report Preparation Date: November 27, 2000 Phase Con Project 00-10-17D 8527 W. Colfax Avenue Suite 243 Lakewood, CO 80215 (303) 238-8629 Douglas A. Close ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 8527 W. Colfax Ave., Suite 243 Lakewood, CO 80215 593 19.75 Road Office: 303-238-8629 Grand Junction, CO 81503 Fax: 303-238-0402 Office/Fax: 970-241-6480 Pager: 303-821-6312 Pager: 970-244-9454 Chateau At Vail Vail, Colorado Phase Con provided asbestos building material inspection and sampling services at the Chateau At Vail, in Vail, Colorado in October and November of 2000. The asbestos inspection was completed prior to the planned demolition of the structure. Materials tested in this building included attic insulation, interior plasters, sheet vinyl flooring, boiler/duct wrap insulation, pipe insulation (fittings), acoustical ceiling sprays and flex connectors. Sampling was performed using non-invasive sampling techniques (only readily accessible areas were inspected). Materials were grouped and classed into homogeneous areas and material types by visual appearance, location within the building, and apparent age_ Only materials which are regulated by the State of Colorado and the EPA during demoltion activities were sampled. Discussion & Recommendations The materials listed in the `Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) List' Section must be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to demolition of the building. The hard pack mudded pipe fittings are concentrated in the basement (primarily in the main corridor with branches into several rooms), in the second floor guest room corridor (above drop ceiling) and in guest room unit heaters. Determination as to whether each guest room unit heater possesses ACM pipe fittings must be made by removal of the heater cover and a visual examination of the interior. A visual examination of several of the units showed fittings in some and not in others (with no reliable pattern); therefore, all of the unit heaters must be opened to determine whether the fittings are present. Quantities and locations of all pipe fittings cannot be determined until the building is unoccupied and the existing ceilings, chases, and walls can be opened up to visually inspect for the presence of the fittings. The demolition contractor should be made aware of the types of ACM discovered in the building, and that he should watch for any ACM which was hidden but may become visible as the building is demolished: This ACM must then be abated by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor, r V Close State and EPA Certified Asbestos Building Inspector/Management Planner Asbestos Containing Materials List Asbestos Containing Mat?rial5(ACM) List The following Asbestos Containing Materials must be removed prior to demolition' • All Hard Pack Pipe Fittings • Popcorn Ceiling Spray: Homestake I Meeting Room (above drop ceiling) Sample Description Tables Chateau At Vail, Vail, Colorado Sample 9 C-01 Boiler Insulation - Yellow/Fibrous C-02 Boiler Insulation - Yellow/Fibrous C-03 Boiler Insulation - Yellow/Fibrous C-04 Boiler Insulation - White/Fibrous C-05 Boiler Insulation - White/Fibrous C-06 Boiler Insulation - White/Fibrous C-07 Firebrick - Boiler C-08 Firebrick - Boiler C-09 Firebrick - Boiler C-10 Boiler Stack Insulation C-11 Boiler Stack Insulation C-12 Boiler Stack Insulation C-13 Wallboard - Boiler Room - East Wall C-14 Wallboard - Boiler Room - East Wall C-15 Wallboard - Boiler Room - East Wall C-16 Attic Insulation - Blown-In Grey C-17 Attic Insulation - Blown-In Grey C-18 Attic Insulation - Blown-In Grey C-19 Attic Insulation - Blown-In Grey C-20 Attic Insulation - Blown-In Grey Chateau At Vail, Vail, Colorado Sample # C-21 Attic Insulation - Blown-In Grey C-22 Attic Insulation - Blown-In Grey C-23 Flex Connector - Boiler Room Attic Space C-24 Flex Connector - Boiler Room Attic Space C-25 Flex Connector - Boiler Room Attic Space C-26 Wallboard - Unfinished - Boiler Room Attic Space - West End C-27 Wallboard - Unfinished - Boiler Room Attic Space - West Middle C-28 Wallboard - Unfinished - Boiler Room Attic Space - West End C-29 Wallboard - Unfinished - Boiler Room Attic Space - East C-30 Wallboard - Unfinished - Boiler Room Attic Space - East C-31 Wallboard - Unfinished - Boiler Room Attic Space - West Middle C-32 Wallboard - Unfinished - Boiler Room Attic Space - West Middle C-33 Insulation - Chiller Side Panels C-34 Insulation - Chiller Side Panels C-35 Insulation - Chiller Side Panels C-36 Flex Connector - Chiller Duct C-37 Flex Connector - Chiller Duct C-38 Flex Connector - Chiller Duct C-39 Wallboard - Textured - Sales Room Wall C-40 Wallboard - Textured - Sales Room Wall Chateau At Vail, Vail, Colorado Sample Description and Location abler Sample # Sample Descriptions and Locations C41 Wallboard - Textured - Sales Room Wall C42 Flex Connector - Attic Space Above Kitchen C-43 Flex Connector - Attic Space Above Kitchen C-44 Flex Connector - Attic Space Above Kitchen C45 Flex Connector - Attic Space Above Kitchen - Abandoned Unit C46 Flex Connector - Attic Space Above.Kitchen - Abandoned Unit C-47 Flex Connector - Attic Space Above Kitchen - Abandoned Unit C48 Flex Connector - Attic Space Above Kitchen - Hood Vent C49 Flex Connector - Attic Space Above Kitchen - Hood Vent C-50 Flex Connector - Attic Space Above Kitchen - Hood Vent C-51 Wallboard - Unfinished - Kitchen Attic Space C-52 Wallboard - Unfinished - Kitchen Attic Space C-53 Wallboard - Unfinished - Kitchen Attic Space C-54 Flex Connector - Furnace Room C-55 Flex Connector - Furnace Room C-56 Flex Connector - Furnace Room C-57 Wallboard - Untextured - Phone Room C-58 Wallboard - Untextured - Phone Room C-59 Wallboard - Untextured - Phone Room C-60 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - Pool Equip Room Chateau At Vail, Vail, Colorado Sample Description and Location Table Sample # C-61 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - Pool Equip Room - Unit Heater C-62 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - Pool Equip Room - Unit Heater C-63 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - Audit Records Storage Room Next to Pool Equipment Room C-64 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - Audit Records Storage Room Next to Pool Equipment Room C-65 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - Audit Records Storage Room Next to Pool Equipment Room C-66 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - Ski Storage - Basement C-67 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - Ski Storage - Basement C-68 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - Ski Storage - Basement C-69 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - Return Line - Hallway Above Drop Ceiling - Basement - Adjacent to Employee Rest Rooms C-70 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - Supply Line - Hallway Above Drop Ceiling - Basement - Adjacent to Employee Rest Rooms C-71 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - Unit Heater by Elevator Equipment Room - Basement C-72 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - Unit Heater by Elevator Equipment Room - Basement C-73 Popcorn Ceiling Texture - Basement - Arcade Area C-74 Popcorn Ceiling Texture - Basement - Central Stairway Area C-75 Popcorn Ceiling Texture - Basement - Lounge Area by Arcade C-76 Popcorn Ceiling Texture - Basement - Hallway Next to Homestake Meeting Rooms Chateau At Vail, Vail, Colorado Sample e ption and Location Tables Sample # Sample Descriptions and Locations C-77 Popcorn Ceiling Texture - Basement - Hallway Next to Homestake Meeting Rooms C-78 Popcorn Ceiling Texture - Basement - Hallway Next to Homestake Meeting Rooms C-79 Coarse Textured Wallboard - Basement - Hallway Ceiling Adjacent to Pool Equipment Room C-80 Coarse Textured Wallboard - Basement - Hallway Ceiling Adjacent to Pool Equipment Room C-81 Coarse Textured Wallboard - Basement - Hallway Ceiling Adjacent to Pool Equipment Room C-82 Textured Wallboard - Basement - Guest Laundry C-83 Textured Wallboard - Basement - Guest Laundry C-84 Textured Wallboard - Basement - Arcade Room C-85 Wallboard - Untextured - Guest Laundry Wall C-86 Wallboard - Untextured - Guest Laundry Wall C-87 Wallboard - Untextured - Ceiling - Mens Sauna C-88 Wallboard -.Untextured - Ceiling - Mens Sauna C-89 Wallboard - Untextured - Ceiling - Womens Sauna C-90 Loose Insulation - Stuffed Around Duct Penetration in Homestake 11 East Wall C-91 Loose Insulation - Stuffed Around Duct Penetration in Homestake II East Wall C-92 Loose Insulation - Stuffed Around Duct Penetration in Homestake II East Wall Chateau At Vail, Vail, Colorado Samule Description and Location Table # .Sample Description and Locations -Sample C-93 Popcorn Ceiling Texture - Basement - Above Drop Ceiling - Homestake I C-94 Popcorn Ceiling Texture - Basement - Above Drop Ceiling - Homestake I C-95 Popcorn Ceiling Texture - Basement - Above Drop Ceiling - Homestake I C-96 Ceiling Tile - Drop-In - Basement - Hallway Outside Employee Rest Rooms C-97 Ceiling Tile - Drop-In - Basement - Hallway Outside Employee Rest Rooms C-98 Ceiling Tile - Drop-In - Basement - Hallway Outside Housekeeping Laundry C-99 Ceiling Tile - Drop-In - Basement - Hallway Outside Accounting C-100 Ceiling Tile - Drop-In - Basement - Hallway Outside Break Room C-101 Wall Plaster - Basement - Employee Rest Rooms C-102 Wall Plaster - Basement - Employee Rest Rooms C-103 Wall Plaster - Basement - Employee Rest Rooms C-104 Wallboard - Ceiling - Basement - Employee Rest Rooms C-105 Wallboard - Ceiling.- Basement - Employee Rest Rooms C-106 Wallboard - Basement - Housekeeping Laundry Storage Room Wall C-107 Wallboard - Basement - Housekeeping Laundry Storage Room Wall Chateau At Vail, Vail, Colorado Sample Description and Location Tables Sample # ..Sample Descriptions and Locations C-108 Wallboard - Basement - Housekeeping Laundry Storage Room Wall C-109 Wallboard - Ceiling - Basement - Accounting Office C-110 Wallboard - Ceiling - Basement -Accounting Office C-111 Wallboard - Ceiling - Basement - Accounting Office C-112 Wallboard - Wall - Basement - Accounting Office C-113 Wallboard - Wall - Basement - Accounting Office C-114 Wallboard - Wall - Basement - Accounting Office C-115 Ceiling Tiles - Basement - Back Accounting Office C-116 Ceiling Tiles - Basement - Back Accounting Office C-117 Ceiling Tiles - Basement - Back Accounting Office C-118 Ceiling Tiles - Basement - Banquet Chair Storage Room C-119 Ceiling Tiles - Basement - Banquet Chair Storage Room C-120 Ceiling Tiles - Basement - Banquet Chair Storage Room C-121 Wallboard - Ceiling - Basement - Marco's Office C-122 Wallboard - Ceiling - Basement - Marco's Office C-123 Wallboard - Ceiling - Basement - Marco's Office C-124 C-125 Popcorn Ceiling Texture - Basement - Break Room & Storage Room Popcorn Ceiling Texture - Basement - Break Room & Storage Room Chateau At Vail, Vail, Colorado Sample Descri tion nd nc-ati Tables Sample # ample Descriptions and Location C-126 Popcorn Ceiln g Texture B C-127 C-128 C-129 C-130 C-131 C-132 C-133 C-134 C-135 C-136 C-137 C-138 C-139 C-140 C-141 C-142 C-143 C-144 - asement -Break Room & Storage Room Wallboard - Basement - Break Room Wall Wallboard - Basement - Break Room Wall Wallboard - Basement - Elevator Equipment Room Wall Wallboard - Basement - Elevator Equipment Room Wall Wallboard - Basement - Elevator Equipment Room Wall Flex Connector - Outside Building - A/C Unit Flex Connector - Outside Building - A/C Unit Flex Connector - Outside Building - A/C Unit Exterior Stucco Exterior Stucco Exterior Stucco Exterior Stucco Exterior Stucco Exterior Stucco Exterior Stucco Textured Wallboard - Overhang Adjacent to Pool Textured Wallboard - Overhang Adjacent to Pool Textured Wallboard - Overhang Adjacent to Pool Chateau At Vail, Vail, Colorado Sample Description and Location Table Sample # ..Sample Descriptions and Locations C-145 Textured Wallboard - Overhang Adjacent to Pool C-146 Textured Wallboard - Overhang Adjacent to Pool C-147 Ceiling Texture - Guest Room 202 C-148 Ceiling Texture - Guest Room 202 C-149 Ceiling Texture - Guest Room 103 C-150 Ceiling Texture - Guest Room 103 C-151 Ceiling Texture - Guest Room 310 C-152 Ceiling Texture - Guest Room 310 C=153 Ceiling Texture - Guest Room 401 C-154 Wallboard - Guest Room 202 Bathroom Ceiling C-155 Wallboard - Guest Room 202 Bathroom Wall C-156 Wallboard - Guest Room 310 Bathroom Wall C-157 Wallboard - Guest Room 310 Bathroom Wall C-158 Wallboard - Guest Room 401 Bathroom Ceiling C-159 Wallboard - Guest Room 401 Bathroom Wall C-160 Wallboard - Guest Room 401 Bathroom Wall C-161 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - 4th Floor Corridor Unit Heater C-162 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - 4th Floor Corridor Unit Heater C-163 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - 4th Floor Corridor Unit Heater C-164 Textured Wallboard - Guest Wing Corridor Ceiling - 3rd Floor Chateau At Vail, Vail, Colorado Sample Description and Location Tablrs Sample # ..Sample Descriptions and Locations C-165 Textured Wallboard - Guest Wing Corridor Ceiling - 3rd Floor C-166 Textured Wallboard - Guest Wing Corridor Ceiling - 1st Floor C-167 Textured Wallboard - Guest Wing Corridor Ceiling - 1st Floor C-168 Textured Wallboard - Guest Wing Corridor Ceiling - 4th Floor C-169 Textured Wallboard - Guest Wing Corridor Ceiling - 4th Floor C-170 Textured Wallboard - Guest Wing Corridor Ceiling - 4th Floor C-171 Textured Piaster - Ice Machine Cubicle Wall - 2nd Floor C-172 Textured Plaster - Ice Machine Cubicle Wall - 2nd Floor C-173 Textured Plaster - Ice Machine Cubicle Wall - 4th Floor C-174 Textured Plaster - Ice Machine Cubicle Wall - 3rd Floor C-175 Textured Plaster - Ice Machine Cubicle Wall - 3rd Floor C-176 Ceiling Tile 2nd Floor Guest Room Corridor - Striations C-177 Ceiling Tile - 2nd Floor Guest Room Corridor - Striations C-178 Ceiling Tile - 2nd Floor Guest Room Corridor - Striations C-179 Ceiling Tile - 2nd Floor Guest Room Corridor - Striations C-180 Ceiling Tile - 2nd Floor Guest Room Corridor - Striations C-181 Ceiling Tile - 2nd Floor Guest Room Corridor - Smooth C-182 Ceiling Tile - 2nd Floor Guest Roam Corridor - Smooth C-183 Ceiling Tile - 2nd Floor Guest Room Corridor - Smooth C-184 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - 2nd Floor Guest Corridor Ceiling Chateau At Vail, Vail, Colorado Sample 4 C-185 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - 2nd Floor Guest Corridor Ceiling C-186 Pipe Fitting Mud Insulation - 2nd Floor Guest Corridor Ceiling C-187 Textured Wallboard - Lobby Ceiling - Troweled Look C-188 Textured Wallboard - Lobby Ceiling - Troweled Look C-189 Textured Wallboard - Lobby Ceiling - Troweled Look C-190 Wallboard - Untextured - Ceiling - Front Area of Front Desk C-191 Wallboard - Untextured - Ceiling - Front Area of Front Desk C-192 Wallboard - Untextured - Ceiling - Front Area of Front Desk C-193 Wallboard - Untextured - Ceiling - Bar Area C-194 Wallboard - Untextured - Ceiling - Bar Area C-195 Textured Plaster - Reservations Office Wall C-196 Textured Plaster - Reservations Office Wall C-197 Textured Plaster - Reservations Office Wall C-198 Wallboard - Copier Room Wall C-199 Wallboard - Copier Room Wall C-200 Wallboard - Copier Room Wall C-201 Ceiling Tiles - 2X2 - Fondue Stube C-202 Ceiling Tiles - 2X2 - Fondue Stube C-203 Ceiling Tiles - 2X2 - Fondue Stube C-204 Ceiling Tiles - 2X2 - Fondue Stube Chateau At Vail, Vail, Colorado Sample it C-205 C-206 C-207 C-208 C-209 C-210 Ceiling Tile - 2X2 - Fondue Stube Wallboard - Kitchen Wall Wallboard = Kitchen Wall Wallboard - Kitchen Ceiling Wallboard - Kitchen Ceiling Wallboard - Kitchen Wall Laboratory Analysis Results 11/06/2000 10:47 4803940186 I PAGE 02 A. E. S. L. 800 North Mary Street Tempe, Arizona 85281 EI yiro=- en#aL Phone: (480) 966-3714 Fax: (480) 394-0188 LABORATORY Tall Free: (877) 854-1767 BULK ASBESTOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY REPOR'T' CLIENT NAME: Phase Con DATE OR RECEIPT: October 31, 2000 593 19 Y. Road SAMPLE CONDITION: Good Grand Junction, Colorado 81503 DATE ANALXZZD: November 5, 2030 A.E.S1. LABORATORY , 00-A709 PROJECT: Chateau at Vail van, CO AIE.S-L LA 33 SAMPLE ID N CLIENT SAMPLE ID 0 CLIENT SAMPLE DESCRIPTION- Uolt Laboratory Description sad Color TEST RESULTS Pos. / Neg. •fe do 't'ype OTHER btATERIAI.S A709-1 C-01 Tan Insulation N alive 100%. ]Mineral Wool A709.2 C-02 Tan Insulation Negative 100% Nviineral Wool A709-3 C-03 Tan Insulation Negative 100%NEiera' Wool A709-4• C-04 White Insulation Negative 100% Miters! Wool A709-5 C-05 White Insulation Negative 100% Mineral Wool A709-6 C-06 White Insulation N alive - 100%. Mineral Wool A709-7 C47 White and Tan Texture N ative 100% Non-Fibrous A709-8 C-08 White and Tan Texture N alive 100% Non-Fibrous . A709-9 C=09 White and Tan Texture Negative 100°/. Non-Fibrous A709-10 C-10 Green lusula6on Negative - - 100%. Non-Fibrous A709-11 C-11 Green Insulation 'Negative_ 100% Non-Fibrous A709-12 C-12 Green Insulation N ative 100°A Non-Fibrous A709-13 a C-13 a White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A.709-131 C-13 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 6010 Non-Fibrous A709-14 a C-14 a White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-14 b C-14 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 60;4 Non-Fibrous A709-15 a C-15 a White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-15 b C-1-5 b Tan Panel Negative - 40%. Cellulose 60014 Non-Fibrous A709.16 C-16 Gray Insulation Negative - 100%. Cellulose A709-17 C47 Gray Insulation N alive 100% Cellulose A709-18 . C-18 Gray Insulation Negative 1000/6 C411u105e A709-19 C-19 Gray Insulation Negative 1000/• Cellulose A709-20 C-20 Gray Insulation N alive 100%. Ca wese A709-21 C-21 Gray Insulation N ative 100% Cellulose A709-22 C-22 Gray Insulation N alive 1000/. Cellulose A709-23 a C-23 a %'hitt: Insulation Negative 100% Fftoue Glass A709-23 b C-23 b Black Backing Negative 100% Non-Fibrous 709-24 a C- 24 a White Insulation Negative 100% Fibrous Glass A709-24 b C. 24 b Black Back/ N alive - 100% Non-Fibrous A709-25 a C-25 a White Insulation Negative 100% Fibrous Glass A709-25 b C-25 b Black Backing Negative 100% Non-Fibrous A709-26 a C-26 a Whits Texture Negative 5910 Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-2'6 b C-26 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 60% Non-Fibrous N11LAP 2170.303-0 CALIF. FLAP 2345 AIHA.-251 G8 11lbb/, UOU 111:4! 41JeJy4blyb Pala 2 Phase Can AESL No. 00-A709 rAtm UJ A.E-S.L. CLIENT CLIENT SAMPLE TEST RESULTS OTH:A 'LAB SAMPLE DESCRIPTION • KAITEP.IALS SAMPLE ID N Unit Laboratory Descriydua sad Color Pos. / Neg. % & Type A709-Y1 a C-17 a Waite Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-27 b C-27 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Celhilosa 60% Nor,,-Fibrous A709-28 at G23 n White Texture Negative S% Cellulose ' 95% Non-Fibrous A709-28 b C-28 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 60% Non-Fibrous A709-29 a C-29 a White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-29 b C-29 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 6011/0, Non-Fib. ous A709-30 a C-30 a White Texture Nsgative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fil~ ous A709-30 b C-30 b Tan Panel Negative - 40% Cellulose 60% Non-Fibrous A709-31 a C-31 a White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-31 b C-31 b Tan Panel Negative - 40% Cellulose 60% Non-Fibrous A709-32 a C-32 a White Texture Negative - 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-32 b C-32 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 60% Non-FIrous A709-33 C-33 Black and Silver Insulation Ne ve 100% Non-Filnous A709-34 . C-34 Black and Silver Insulation N ve 1000: Non-Fibrous A700-35 C-35 Black and Silver Insulation Negative - - 100% Non4ilbrous A709-36 s C-36 a White Insulation Negative 100% Fibrous Glass " A709-36 b C-36 b Black Baskin Ne ivt 10096 Non-Fibrous - A709-37 a C-37 a White Insulation Ne ve 100% Fibrous Glass A709-37 b CA7 b Black Backing Negative 100% Non=Fibrous A709-38 a C-38 a White-Dimlation Nc ve 100% Fibrous Glass A709.38 b C-3S b Black Backing Ne ve 100% Non-Kxous A709-39 a C-39 R Whitt Texture Negative 5% CcUukse 95% Non-Fibrous A709-39 b C-39 b . Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulos-. 60% Non-Fibrous A70940 C-40 Tan and White Texture Negative 2%a Cellulose 9rK Non-Fibrous A70941 a C4 1 a White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95e/s Nori-Fibrous A709-41 b C41 b Tan Panel Negative 400A Cellulasa 60°/a Non-Fibrous A709-42 C42 Gray Insulation Negative 90aYa Fibrous Glass 100/6 Non-Fibrous A709-43 C-43 Gray bmulatioa Negative 90019 Fibrous Glass 100/0 Non-Fib-vua A70944 C-44 Gray Insulation FNative 90% Fibrous Grew I Qa/a Non-Fib: ous A. E. S. L. virmcnK LABOFATORX 11/L~b;''LJtJk1 le,4r 48L/JV41dlbL- Page 3 Phase Con AESL No. 00-A709 HA(]c J4 A. E. S. L. EnvzroorumentaL, LABORATORY Page 4 Phase Con AESL No. 00-A709 A E.S.L. CLIENT CLIENT SAMPLE T TEST JRLSULTS OT=- R LAA SAMPLE DESCRLPTION - MATEKALS SAMPLE JD O Unit Laboratory Description -and Color Pos. / Neg. % & Typs ID M A709-61 C-61 1r'Lite Insulatioa Positive 10% Cbrysottle 5% Cellulose 5% Amosite 5.1. Fibrous Glass 75% Noa4t-rows A709-62 C-62 White Insulation Positive 10% Chrysotile 5% Cellulose 5% Amaslte 5% Fibrous Glass 75% Non-Fibrous A709-63 C-63 Whito Insulation Positive 10% Chrysome 5% Cellulose 5% Amosite 5% Fibrous :lass 75% Noes--Fibrous A709-64 C44 White Insulation Positive 10% Chrysettle 59/6 Ceiinlose 5% Amosite 5/• Fibrous Glass 75% Non-Fibrous A709-b5 C 65 White Insulation Positive 10% CUI-J wWC 5% G71uluse S*16 Amosite 5% Fibrous Clays 75% Non-Fibrous A709-56 C-66 White Insulation Positive 10% Chrgsot le 5%. Cellulose S% Amoaite 5% Fibrous Mass 75% Non-Mbrous A709-67 C-67 Wbite Insulation Positive 16% Chrysotile S% Cellulose . 5% Amosite 5% Fibrous :-lases 75% Non-Fibrous A709-68 C-M White Insulation positive 10% Cbrysotile 3% Cellulose 5% Amosite 5% Fibrous Glass 75% Nos-Fibrous A709-69 C-69 White Insulation Positive 10% Chrysotile 5% Cellulose 5% Amositc 5% Fibrous Clam - 75% Noes-From A709-70 C-70 White Insulation Positive 10% Chrysotue 5% Cellulose 5% A oesitc 5% Fibrous Glass 75% Nos-Fibrous A709-71 C-71 White Insulation positive 10% ChrysotUe 5.16 Cellulose 5% Amosite 5% Fibrous Glass- 75% Non-Fibrous A709-72 . C-72 White Insulation Positive 10°/a Chrysorlle 5% CsAulose 5% Amositc 5% Fibrous Glma 75% Non-Mrous A709-73 C-73 White and Tan Texture Negative 10°/. Cellulose 900K Non-Fibrous A709-74 C-74 White and Tan Texture Negative 10°/6 Cellulose 900/6 Non-Fibrous A709-75 C-73 White and Tau Texture Negative 10% Cellulose 90% Non-Fibrous A709.76 C-76 White and Tan Texture Negative 10% Cellulose 90% Non- Fibre 709-77 C-77 White nnc3 Tan Texture Ncptivc 109'6 Cellulose 90% Non-Fibrous 709-78 [ C-78 White and Tan Texture Negative 10% Celtnlo.8e 900% Non-Fibrous A709-79 C-79 White Texture . Negative 5°/u Cellulose I 95% Non-Fibrous A. E. S. L. Enyiror-rlentaL LABQF..ITO Y 11/1Jb/:21JdU 10: 4t 4K3946188 Page S Phase Con ABSL No. 00-A709 HA6c. !b A.ES.L. CLIENT CLIENT SAZWLE TEST RESULTS OTI R LM SAMPLE AESCRUMON - MATEF :ALS SAMPLE ED 0 Call LaboratoryAeserip0ca and Color Pos. / K% % & Type IDN A709-80 C-80 White Texture Negative 1 5% Cellulose ' 95 % Non-Fibrous A709-81 C-81 White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fi'broas A709-82 C-82 jwsite and Teo Texture Negative 10% Cellulose 90°/.Non-Fit~_ous A709-83 C-83 White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-84 a C-84 a White Texture Negative 1 5% CeIlulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709.84 b C-84 b. Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 60% Non-Fibrous A709-85 a C-83 a White Texture Negative 5% Cdllt►lose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-85 b C-85 b Tan Panel Negative - 40°/6 Cellulose 60. Non-Fib.,mus . A709-86 a C-$6 a White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A70946 b C-86 b . Tan Panel Negative 401% Cellulwc 60% Non-Fib: ous A709-87 C-87 White and Yellow Texture Negative 51'16 Cellulose 959/6 Non-Fibrous A709-88 C-88 White and Yellow Texture Negative S% Cellulose 95x'6 Non-Fu'brotrs A709-89 C-89 White and Yellow Texture Negative - 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-90 'C-90 Green Insulation Ne a I0M.MinentlWool A709-91 C-91 Green 1=1ation Ne a 100% inera: Wool A709-92 C-92 Green Insulation N ative - 100°x6 Mimes? Wool A70943 C-93 White and Tan Texture positive 5% Chrysotiiie 10% Cellulose 85% Non-Weroux A709=94 CAA White and Ton Texture Positive S%a Cbryxotilc 10% CeDuloce $5% Non-Fibrous A709-95 C-95 White and Tan Texture Positive 5% Chrysotile lay* Ceiluloar. 85% Non-Fibrous A709-96 C-96 White and Grey Ceiling Tile Negative 20% Ccllul= 20% Mh aral -Wool WA Non-Fib-ous A709-97 C-97 White arid-Gray Ceiling Tile Negative 20% Celluiose 201/Mineral "Wool 60% Non-Fibrous A709-98 C-98 Whitt and Gray Ceiling Tile Negative - 20% Cellulose 20% Mineral Woo) 6U°r6 Non-F'brain A709-99 C49 Whitc Had Glpy Coiling Tilo Nozi&c 20% Cclluinm 20% Mineral 60% Non-Fibmus A709-100 C-100 White and Gray Ceiling Tile Negative 209b Cellulose 20% fond `XQv1 60% Non-Fibrans A. E. S. L, Elvnror-mmtaL LASOF. STORY Page 6 Phase Can AESL No, 00-A709 E.S.L. CLIENT SAMPLE CLIENT SAMPLE DESCRIPTION - TEST RESULTS D k ID # Unit Lsboratory Description and Color Pas, Neg. % & Type A7 .1 11 C-101 Whice and Cream Texture Negative A709-10- C-102 White and Crrsm Texture Negative A709-103 C-103 white and Cream Texture Ncgatiye - A709-104 C-104 White and Cream Texture Negative i A709-105 a C-105 a Twhitc Texture Negative i A709-105 b C-105 b Tan Panel Negative i A709-106 a I C-106 a White Texture Negative A709-106 b C-106 b Tan Panel Negative A709-107 a C-107 a White Texture Negative A709-109 b C-107 b Tan Panel Negative A709-108 a 0-108 a White Texture Negative A709.108 b C=108 b Tan Panel Negative A709-109 a C=109 a Whita Texture Negative X709-109 b. C-109 b Tan Panel A709-110 C-110 Wbke and Creatn Texture A709.111 C7111 White and Cream Texture A709-112 a C-112 a White Texture A709-112 b C-112 b Tan Panel A709-I13 it C-113 a White Texturo A709.113 b C-il3 b Tan Panel A709-114 a _ C-114 a White Texture T7 09-114 b C-114 b Tan Panel A709-115 C-115 White and Gray Ceiling Tile A709-16 I C-116 I White and Gray Ceiling Tile Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative MATER.:-US 2% Cellulose 9t3°ie Neu Fibrous '1% Cellulose 99% Non-Fibrous 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous i2°% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous 5% Celwose 95% Non-Fibrous 40% Cellulose 609/6 Non-Fibrous 5% Cellulose 95Non-Fibrous 40% Cellulose- 60% Non-Fibrous 5°/6 Cellulose 95% Non-FiUrQUs 40°.6 Cellulose 60016 Non-Fibmns 5°% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrou 3 400/9 Cellulose 606/6 Nan-Fita'ous $6% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibro-as 40% Cellulose 600% Non-Fibrata 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrcns 2% Cellulose 5% Cellulose 206/. Mineral Wool 60% Non-Fibrous 20% Cellulose 20% Mineral VV"001 60% Non-Fibrous A. E. S. L. Envi-ow-ientaj_ LABOXA. TORY 11J GC/ ZU(Jt] lb; 4! 4bCd'74blbt: HAL= ib Page 7 Phew con AESL No. DO-A709 60% Non-Ftbmua. A709-123 C-.133 Tan and White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95%u Non-Fibrous A709-124 C-1 24 White Texture Negative 5% Callwose A709=125 C-123 White Texture Negative 95% Non-Fibrous 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrou A709-726 C-126 White Texture Negative , 5% Cellulose 95% Nan-Fibrous A709-127 a C-127 a Whig Texture Negative - 5% Cellulose i 95% Non-Fibrow: A709.127 b C-127 b Tan Panel Negative 400A Cellulose , 60% Nc r4ibm w A709-128 a C-118 a Whito Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 7709-128 b C-128 b Tin Pagel Negative 95% Non+ibrr, is 40% Cellulosa 60% Non-Fibrous A709.129 a C-129 'a White Texture Negative S% Cellulose 95% Non-Flbro; i9 A709-129 b C-129 b Teri Panel Negative 4056 Cellulose Non-Fibro as 600% A709-130 a C-130 z VVbite Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 93% Non-Fibmits A709-130 b_ C-130 b Tan Passel Negative 40% Cellulose A709.131 a C-131 a Wbitc Texture Negative 60% Non-Fibro.is 3•/• Ce3htiose 95% Non-Fibrous [709-131 b C-131 b Tan Panel Negative 40%o Cellulose 60% Non-Fibrcus A709-132 a C-132 a White Insulation N ative - 100% S thrdc Fibers A709-132 b C-132 b Black Backing N ative 100% Non-Fib-cus A709-133 a . C-133 a A Ate Insulation Ne alive 100% Synthetic Ffibers A. E. S L.. raczltaL LABOR=.TC?RY liF VO/ zuQU it); 41 • 4dUJj4UIbt: PAGE 09 Page 8 Phase Can A.ESL No. OO-A7o9 A.E+S,L CLIENT LAB • S&NWLE ri..IFNT SAMPLE DESCRIPTION - TEST RESULTS OTIIE3 SAMPLE m # Unit Laboratory Iiwcription mad Color Pos. / Neg. % & Type MATER _ALS IDig A709-133 b C-133 b Black Backing N ative 100% Nun-Fib-aus A709-134 n C-134 a White Insulation N tive 100% s theti=. Fibers A709-134 b C-134 b I Black Backin N ive 100% Non-Fib-, ous A709-135 C-135 Tan and Gray Texture j ve 3% Cellulose 97% Nnn-Fih--,,q A MY- L JO L-1-10 Tan and Gray Texture Negative 3% Cellulose A709-137 C-137 Tan and Gray Texture Negative 97% Non-Fibrous 3% Cellulose A709-138 C-138 Tan and Gray Terre Negative 97°! Non Fibrous 3% Cellulose A709-139 C-I39 Tan and Gray Texture Negative 97% Nan-Fibrcus 3% Cellulose 97% Non-;"ibraus A709-1.40 C-140 Tat and Gray Texture Negative 3°/9 Cellulose 979A Non-Fibr,us A709.141 6141 Tan nud Gray Texture Negative 3% Cellulose 97°/, N=-Fibrr-us A709-142 C-142 Whitt Texture Negative 4% Cellulose 96% Non-Fibrem A709-143 C-143 White Texture Negative 4% Cellulose 96% Noc 4tbmus A709-144 C-144 White Texture Negative 4% Cellulose 96% Non-Fibrous A709-145 a C-145 it Whitc Tcxturc Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-14S b C-145 b Tan Panel Negative -----r_ 40% Cellulose 60% Non-Fibrous A709-146 a C-146 a White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95%Non-Fibrous A709-146 b C-146 b Tan, Fend NeYativc 40% Cellulose 60% Non-Fibrous A709-147 C-147 White and Tan Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrcas A709-148 C-148 White and Tan Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrosis A709-149 0.149 White and Tan Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous 7709-150 C-130 Whitc.and Tan Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibre is A709-151 C-151 White and Tan Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-152 C-152 White and Tan Texture Negative - 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibre as A709-153 C-153 Whine and Tar: Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrcua A709-154 a C-154 a White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 950/. Non-F ibrc:is A709-154 b C-154 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 60% Non-Fibres A. E. S. L. J~nvlrorlrrnentaL LABORr.70RY 11/Nb/'Crud 1d: 47 4K3548.86 PAGE 1E Page 9 Phase Con AESL No. 00-A709 I-AJ3 SAMPI,i; DESCRIPTION - 1LJ4 xr.JUL1J - OTH~-R SAWLE M#, VWf Laboratory De3eriptlon and Ca1or Pao. / Ireg, 7'o do T e MAC.-ALS ID yp A709-155 a C.4551 White Texture 1 Negative 5% Cellulose 7709-133 b C-155 b Tan Farrel Negative 4 95%Non-Fibnxja 40% Cellulose A,709-156 C White and Tan Texture Negative 60% Non-Fibrcus 3% Cellulose A709-157 a C- 3 57 a White To.-,,.. _ . 95% Nan-Fibrous •'-.e.... • -?7o LCIJUIOSC A709-157 b ' C-13.7 b Tan Panel Negative 95% Non-Fibrous 401.1; Cellulose A709-158 a C-158 a White Texture Negative 60% Non-Fibrous _ 5% Cellulose A709-158 t: C-168 b Tait Panel Negative 95°Y Non-Fibr.^us 40% Cellulose A709.159 a C-159 a White Texture Negative 60% Non-Fibrous 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-159 b C-159 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 6001a Non-Film-,w A709-160 0;160, a White Texture Negative Sp% o Cellulose 95% Non-Fc-^~s A709-160 b C-160 b Tan Panel Negative - 401/v CcOulose 60°.6 Ncn=Fibrous A709-161 C-161 Tan Tulare Poaitire 10% Chrysotile iM/e Callutase 80% Non-Fibrono A709-162 C-162 Tau Texture Positive 1 10%. Chryaotile 10% Cslivlose 80% Naa-Fibrous A709-143 C-163 Olt-White Texture P031t1Ve 15%. Chrysotile 10%. Cellulose 5% Amaalte 70% Non-Fibrous A709-164 a C-164 a White Texture Negative 5010 Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-164 b C-164 b Tan panel Negative 40% Cellulose 60% Non-Fibrous A709-169 a C•165 a White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose, 95% Non-Fibro,is A709-165 b C-165 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 60%. Non-Fibrous A709466 a C-166 a White Texture Negative 5%i Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrowa 7709-166 b C,166 b Tan Panel Negative 40%. Cellulose 60% Non-Fibrous A709467 a C-1671 White Texturo Negative - 5% Cellulosc 95% Non-Fibmus A709-167 b C-167 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 60% Non-Fibre is A709-168 a . C-168 a Who to Texture ~7egativa 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibmis A709-168 b C-168 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 60% Non-Fibre s A709.169 a C-169 a White Texture Negative - 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrcus A. E. S. L. Enviror=ieniaL LABOR TORY 11/ UO! 4000 J. U. 41 40CJ74Ui oc r r•a~ ;-i Fage 10 Phase Con AESL No. 00-A709 A-E.S.L LAB CLIENT CLIE1Vi'S".YLE SAMPLE DESCRIPTION- TESTRTSULTS SAMPLE ID* m # Un1t Laboratary Dascrlptiad and Ca1nr Pas I Neg % it Type Ma►TE~ZALS A709.169 b C-169 b Tan Panel Nogativc 40% Ceih,lose A709-170 a C-170 a White Texture Negative 60% Non-Fibrous S% Cellulose A709470-b 709470 b - 0.170 b Tan Panel Negative - 95% Non-Fibrou 40% Cellulose A?09-171 C-171 White Texture Negative 60% Non-Fibrou.> 10% Cellulose A709-172 C•1 ?2 White Texture ' Negative - 90% Non-Fibror; 1(rCellulose A709-173 C-173 White Texture Negative 90% Non-Fib-ors 10% Cellulose 90% Non-Fibrous A709-174 C-174 Whito Texture Negative 10% Cellulose 90% Non-Fibrt,as A709-175 C-175 White Texture Negs6yc 10%a cellulose, 90% Non-Fibre A709-176 C-176 White and Tan Ceiling Tile Negative - 209'. Cellulose 20'A Mineral "i ool 60% Non Fibrous A709-I77 C-177 White and Tan Ceiling Tile Negative 200/2 Cellwose 20% Mineral Wool 60°/a Nos-Fibrous A709-178 C-178 White and Tan Ceiling Tile Negative 20°/. Cellulose 20% Mineral Wool 60%a Non-Fib gnus. A709-179 C-179 White and Tan Ceiling Tile Negative 200A Cellulose; 200A Mineral Wool 60% Non-Fib.;us A709-180 C-180 White and Tan Ceiling Tile Negative 2OP/o Cellulose 20% Min=l Wool 60%- Non-Fibrous . A709-181. C-181 White and Tan Ceiling Tile Negative 20% Cellulose 20°/c Mineral Wool 60% Non-Fib-ous A709=182 C-182 White and Tan Ceiling Tile Negative 20% Cellulose 20% Mineral Vlool .60% Non:Fibi cur AZQ9-1$3 C-1'83 White and Tan Ceiling Tils Negative -x 20% Cellulose lUY* MMus) Wool 604/a Non-Fibr•7us A709-181 C-184 Tan Texture Positive 10°/a Chrysotik 10% Cellulost 84% Non-Fibrous _ A709-183 C-185 Tan Texture Podtive 10% Cbrysotile 10% Cellulose 80% Non-FIL erns 47WI86 C-186 Tae Texture Positive 10% Chrysatile 10•l. Cellulose 80% Non-Fibrous A709-187 C-187 White Texture Negative 3% Cellulose 97% Non-l:ibi pus A709-198 C-188 White Texture Negative 3% Ccllulosc 97% Non-Fibrous A. E. S. L. F,rtvTaserttaL LABOII44.TOR Y 11/ U011cUtl Iri; 41 4bCJ'J40IVZ Page 11 Phase Con AESL No. 00-A709 h''al7c 1 is LAB S•LMPLE 1+L AA41 i OPLITIrLA DESCRIMON - TEST RESULTS OTM7_R SAMPLE M* ID N Unlt Laboratory Deaeriprloa and Color Po& i Ntg, % & Type AIA,TERy,jZ A7091189 C-189. W hite'Texture F Negative 3y°Cellulose A709-190 a C-190 a While Texture Negative O/a Nan- 9 ibrcus S% % Cellulose A709-190 b C-190 9 " an Panel ativ Ne 95% Non-Fibrous ° g e 40 Cellulose: A709-191 a C-191 a. White Texture Negative 60% Non-Fibr,_us 5'O Cellulose A709-191 b C-191 b Tan Panel Negative 95% Non-Fibrous 40% Cellulose A709-192 a C-192 a White Texture Negative - 60% Non-Fibrous 5% Cellulose: 95% Non-Fibrous A709-192 b C=192 b Tan Panel Negative 40x,6 Cellulose _ _ 60°fo Non-Fibrous A709.193 a C-1 93 a White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose A709-193 b C-193 b Tan Panel Negative 95°x6 Non-Pil?r w 40°x6 Cellulose A709-194 a I C4_94 a White Texture Negative 5010 Cellulose.. 95% Non-1~ibrcus X709-194 b G194 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 60% Non-Fitr` A709-195, a. C-195 a White Texture Negative - 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fitrcus A709,195 b C-193 b Ten Panel Negative 40% Cclhtlosi! 60% Non-Fibrous A709-196 a C-196 a White Texture Negative 5% Ctlhiloge 95% Non-Fibrous A709-196 b C-196b. Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 60% Non-Fibrous A709-197 C-197 White Text= Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Nun-Fibrous A709-I98 it C-198 a White Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fib-cus 7709-198 b C-198 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Celiulo; c 60% Non-Fitsrous X709-199 a C-199 a Whine Texture Negative 3% Cellulost 95% Non-F_; ~rcus A709-199 b C-199 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellul;>sa 60% Non-Fibrous A709-200 a C-200 a Wlx tc Texture Negative 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous A709-200 b C-200 b Tan Panel Negative 40% Cellulose 60% Nca-Fibroses A709-201 C-201 White and Tan Texture Negative 200/0 Cellulose 20% tAineral IA7001 60% .400-Fibres A709-202 G-Z02 White and Tan Texture Negative 20"- L "tllulose 20% Mineral Wool 60% Yon-Fibrcns A. E. L, v2L=:acntaL, LABORATORY 11/bb/LbYJb lb; 4/ 4UUJ, 140i6b Page 12 Phase Con AFSL No. 00-A709 A E S L CLIENT CLIENT SAMPLE TrS7 RESULTS TS LAB SIMPLE DESCRIPTION - SAMOPLE 1D~ Unit Laboratory Daaer~tpoon aad Color Poe- ! mti Neg. Type A709-203 C-20? White aad Tea 7azttue Negative A709-204. C-204 White and Tan Texture 1 Ncgative White and Tan Texture A7U5i-206 a C-206 a White and Blue Texture Ncgative A709-206 b q-206 b Tan Panel Negative A709-207 a C-207 a White and Blue Texture Negative A709-207 b C-207 b Tan Panel Negative FAGS 13 NIATExL4LS 20% Cellulose 201/o Mineral Wool 60% Non-Fib pus 20°.6 Cellulose * 20'/o Mmcrsl Wool 60% Non-Fibrous 20% Cellulose 20°A Mineral Wocl 40% 60% A709-209 a t C-209 a Whitt and Blue Texture Negative Cellulose - - A709-209 b C-209 b Tan Panel Negative 95% Non-Fibrous 40% Cellulose A709-210 a C-220 a White and Blue Texture Negative 60% Non-Fibrous 5% Cellulose A709-110 b C-2.i0 b Tsa panel Negative 95% Non-Fibrous 40% Cellulose It;end NM1'Ck Na Artalrsed As Por Cum= Roquw 60%Non-Fibrous Comment. Method: Polarized Light Microscopy, EPA Method 600/R-931116 The result quantitations reporbed are an.estimadon based on the methods of visual microscopic estimation which is considered only a semi-quantitative technique. Also, this report is indicative only of the sample material AP.S.L. Laboratory received,. Results do not trecessarily reflect the makeup of the entire span of the material from which the samples were derived Sampling bechniquea and/or sample handling may affect the integrity of the sampk/s before submission to A.B.S.L. Laboratory and hence the outcome of the laboratory results. Samples not destroyed by testing are retained a minitnurn of thirty days A.E.S.L. Laboratory, recommends re-analysis by point count or Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) for materials that are found to contnin )era than ten percent (<10%) asbestos by PLM. This. report cannot be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of A.E.S.L. Analyst: Ronnie Kefi;son d.orL+aoanto9~x A. E. L. Envizoxl>?iental, LABORATORY Certificates ASBESTOS CERTIFICATION STA Off:.. COLBRADO Colorad6 D P e~~.artih. ..d"Pu C HeaZtl ~ .....and:~Eav~ronment...:: Air.:Pollution ©ntr 'd D,wisio 'Th'cer'ti Us ~tl at Douglas ose certification.>Na ` 474-72= 353 s< Y has inset the requirements of:.' 5-7-50.74' C R.~-- ':'andFA r ualit : _ - Y Control Commissio ; 'ulaa on o art B and is hereby certifier by die state'vf Colorado in th.e rollowing dis~cipline: INSPE TAR/:1VIANAGEA-MN'T` PLANNER Issued: 11/07/2000 Expires: 11/07/2001 Authoriztd APCD Representative • This certificate is valid only with the possession of current AHERA certfication in the discipline specified above. Record Number: 4009. U ^ W Q Z a H ~ W N U X o o W r l U ~ N O W ~ poo .O U W Or ca o x in O C/) _ . W a b U O cc Q ca W ~ z A t-4 Cd O Q~ N Off A 1" 1 , ° A 7Eb 00 O O- 0 ON 0 N M ~r M N Q. N m ca ~oo • o ~z U In ~a oo~x Uzvw U C7 d0 A ~ N ~ N vai""N V ~ O n w 3Ur°~ 6~~M .boa C O W ~ A 2 r D _o n in v) co 0 O r) O n p n O' Cif n N O a~' ~ w o O rD N v N C) °C>°a c Ln o m a [p J p ^rD a ti rb w c Lri y w rn U r) ro Z Z C) cz. S I rD oC a) I-u fT Pw r O C)o n CA 0 b~ a, -Q Cl- CsJ w o w ~u l 1 cr. O fa y Q :3 D o D r-r O rD D n ~ n r) EL n p~ ro o' n~ n' t j o Q.. -r. p • Z 0 0 crq a' C7 rD n ro O let CD o ~ b0 N 3 n ~ w v ~ o Co o a ~ ~ y n O a O ~ rp t-j O w o o' O • rD m O I G Jul 22 2005 7:32 TRCONSTRUCTION Jul, 22, 2005 3:20AM HOLY CROSS HOLY CROSS ENERGY Disconnect p.3 P. 2 ( f)hA, ;0~f' - 64,0?) Account # : 233014003 Map Loc: 5296002 Service order 122973 Job DeSC; DEsMOAND REMOVE LISHING (FUTURE 4 -SEASONS) Taken Ely: 129.11 Date Taken: 0711312005 Date Needed: 7/20/2005 *10 S. Cyc: 2 Home Phone: not on file Srv Desc: HOLIDAY INN 13 VAIL ROAD Work Phone: i6w Subdivision: Blk: Lot: Mobile Phone: not on file Service: OH Line.Srv Area: NONE ASSIGNED Dist: Avon Office Trf Map Location: 6265030 Substation: Vail Feeder. 4 HOLIDAY INN CO ' Line Seatlon: 48-0 County: Eagle Town : VAIL Rate 96670 64922266 53 60 5 N 6712005 10862 p0 NOT BOOT GT tpETEA Trans 6 Secondary size Phase Bank • Load Mgt serial t Itate Cd LM Stat Load Type Stet Rwr► 2190 716002263 300 A0C 0 Device d Device Desc Comments: JILL FAX FROM CHUCK W1 TR CONST 7115105 APPLY DEP ON ACCT PLEASE DIS AND REMOVE SERVICe THEY ARE DEMOLISHING THIS HOTEL AND THE FOUR SEASONS WILL. TAKE ITS PLACE IN THE FUTURE assess Ar+tffield Comments a LVR Date LV ROC XWH Rd9 Status 7195740020 No, 3179 ConlRepair/DisJRam fax ~ , z. 5fs Gild V S ~f~ Date: 7t_ Motor Left? Y EI Retired Service? (5N Akf Crew Name Print Date: 0711312005 Print Time: 2:29.08 PM Form: DIS I Last Printed: 0711312005 Lost Printed to: HP40 Prior 0 of Prints: ! Job Co al®ted; BY. Date: on Computer: By. Date; Disconnect' Map Loc: $296002 TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES DEMO. OF PART/ALL BLDG. Permit D05-0005 Job Address: 28 S FRONTAGE RD WEST VAIL Status ISSUED Location.......: 28 S.Frontage Rd Alpine Standard Applied.. : 06/28/2005 Parcel No....: 210107101019 Issued 07/20/2005 Project No Expires 01/16/2006 OWNER MOELLENTINE LAND CO LLC 06/28/2005 461 FIFTH AVE NEW YORK NY 10017 APPLICANT NICOLLET ISLAND DEVELOPMENT 06/28/2005 Phone: 612-332-1500 600 FOSHWAY TOWER MINNIAPOLIS, MN 55402 CONTRACTOR T.R. CONSTRUCTION INC 06/28/2005 Phone: 719-574-0020 114 TROY HILL ROAD COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80916 License: 820-B Desciption: DEMOLITION OF EXISTING GAS STATION Occupancy: N/A Type Construction: N/A NOT APPLICABLE Type Occupancy: Valuation: $75,000.00 Add Sq Ft: 0 Fireplace Information: Restricted: # of Gas Appliances: 0 # of Gas Logs: 0 # of Wood Pellet: 0 FEE SUMMARY Building > $818.75 Res tuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees--> $1,353.94 Plan Check $532.19 DRB Fee > $0.00 Additional Fees > $0.00 Investigation-> $0.00 Recreation Fee--------------> $0.00 Total Permit Fee > $1,353.94 Will Call-----> $3.00 Clean-up Deposit > $0.00 Payments > $1,353.94 TOTAL FEES > $1,353.94 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0.00 Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 07/11/2005 CDAVIS Action: CR Corrections list can be found attached to sumbitted documents 07/19/2005 cdavis Action: AP Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 07/20/2005 George Action: AP Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/18/2005 mcgee Action: AP Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 07/07/2005 is Action: AP approval to install construction fence around property boundaries. Item: 05700 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH See page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF PAGE 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit D05-0005 as of 07-20-2005 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: Applicant: 07/20/2005 Job Address: Location: Parcel No: DEMO. OF PART/ALL BLDG. NICOLLET ISLAND DEVELOPMENT 612-332-1500 28 S FRONTAGE RD WEST VAIL 28 S.Frontage Rd Alpine Standard 210107101019 Applied: 06/28/2005 Issued: To Expire: 01/16/2006 Description: DEMOLITION OF EXISTING GAS STATION Conditions: Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R050001106 Amount: $1,353.94 07/20/200511:35 AM Payment Method: Check Init: DDG Notation: BTS Conctruction 4099 Permit No: D05-0005 Type: DEMO. OF PART/ALL BLDG. Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-9 Site Address: 28 S FRONTAGE RD WEST VAIL Location: 28 S.Frontage Rd Alpine Standard Total Fees: $1,353.94 This Payment: $1,353.94 Total ALL Pmts: $1,353.94 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 818.75 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 532.19 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00 Jun 23 2005 13:39 TRCONSTRUCTION 7195740020 p.3 f Jun-Z3• ZUUD 6JDAM a I P l n e en91neeripB inc No•41bI P 1 ` APPLICATION V1flLL N07 BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSI C! Project 0 Building Permit Clk5 ~s mil TOWN OpF'~IL 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 For Parcel # Contact Ea 'e Goun Assessors Office at 970-328-8640 or visit w a~1 Zoto~-( o 109 S Job Name: % ` Job Address: Legal Description Lot: Block: Filing: Subdivision: Owners Name: iriL-L Address: Architect/Des igner: ` 1-, Address:TJ 0NG,L - worms Work Class:. New( ) Addition( ) Remodel( ) Repair ( ) Demo ( Other { ) Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Both (tK Does an EHU exist at this location; Yes ( ) No Typa of Mfg- Single-family ( ) Two-family { ) Mufti-family ( ) Commercial ( Restaurant ( )Other O - - No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: No. of Accommodation Units in this building Noll a of Fire laces Existin : Gas A Itanoes Gas Los Wood/Pellet Wood Bumin N07 )2e of Fire laces Proposed, Gas A fiances Gas Log~j Wood/Pellet Wood Burnin NOT ALLOWEd Does a Fire Alarm Exist: es ( ) No ( Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes ( ) No FOR OFFICE USE ONLY nnr~~snl7 r P . FINAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER TITLE POLICY ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 2005 [GAS STATION; PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO. 20107101019] PARCEL A: A PART OF LOT A OF AMENDED MAP OF SHEET 1 OF 2 OF VAIL VILLAGE, SECOND FILING, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A; THENCE SOUTH 79 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A, A DISTANCE OF 152.65 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT A; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A, A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 12 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 156.13 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A, A DISTANCE OF 110.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO. [CHATEAU HOTEL; PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO. 201071010161 PARCEL B: A PART OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND BEING A PART OF LOTS A, B, AND C OF AMENDED MAP OF SHEET 1 OF 2 OF VAIL VILLAGE SECOND FILING, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7; 39.20 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 6; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 100 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 47 SECONDS AND ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, 25.44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF VAIL ROAD, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE AFOREMENTIONED LINE AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A, 152.65 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE LEFT OF 100 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 47 SECONDS AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT A, 110.0 FEET; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE LEFT OF 73 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 12 SECONDS, 156.13 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF VAIL ROAD; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 73 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 12 SECONDS AND ALONG SAID WEST LINE 29.15 FEET; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 106 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 48 SECONDS, 156.13 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT A; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE LEFT OF 134 DEGREES 17 MINUTES I 1 SECONDS, 67.00 FEET; THENCE ON 97979.doc AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, 18.27 FEET; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE LEFT OF 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, 86.00 FEET; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 102 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 17 SECONDS, 101.50 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF WEST MEADOW DRIVE; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 38 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 30 SECONDS AND ALONG THE SAID NORTHERLY LINE 264.42 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 525.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 12 SECONDS, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 58.52 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT C; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 84 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 35 SECONDS AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT C, 251.25 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 6; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS AND ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE 300.00 FEET; MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 97979.doc Project Name: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL DEMOLITION DRS Number: DRB050310 Project Description: FINAL APPROVAL FOR THE DEMOLITION OF GAS STATION AND EXISTING HOTEL WITH REVEGETATION AND RESTORATION PLAN Participants: OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 06/28/2005 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 06/28/2005 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 Project Address: 13 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 13 VAIL ROAD Legal Description: Lot: 9- A Block: Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 2 Parcel Number: 2101-071-0101-6 Comments: SEE CONDITIONS BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Action: STAFFAPR Second By: Vote: Date of Approval: 06/28/2005 Conditions: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond:201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond:202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Planner: George Ruther DRB Fee Paid: $20.00 c CD CJ~ O Cil -n O U) M O CD 3 O O O CD 0 r-+. IN O r u Lf) o N O ca h 0 ^ N a '~J^]y R J J _ .1 --1 - - - - r 7r- Ull H Q O . O J o N z- W LO ~ Ocn ui jCD a >~w W ~z poi J o ga UA ~Az .a ru Q' O J Ln o- O a rn .a O 0 Lrl O M 0 o' a (:p b cI a~o 0 .y T.R. CONSTRUCTION, INC. 114 Troy Hill Road Colorado Springs, CO. 80916 Phone: 719-574-0020 Fax: 719-574-0021 E-Mail: TRCONST@MSN.COM 7 July 2005 Town of Vail Attn: Leonard Sandoval 42 West Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Subject: Demolition Notes for 28 S. Frontage Rd. Per your conversation 7/6/05 with Mike Fraser, owner representative for above, we will provide the following: • Provide flaggers, if required to maintain pedestrian and vehicular traffic. • All tractor/trailers to be staged within the construction boundaries and not on outside streets. • Abide by the Town of Vail work rule hours for operations. • Ensure all equipment meets noise level ordinances. Respectfully, all Chuck Turns Demoli on - Excavat' n tilities - uc i -1 N i i T! N N N i N N 10 T t9 T m m : lT0 04 j aS T t0 _L N a) '0 'D m M N .1 M En U) ° rn rn ° + + + + + + U ) CO m` + + T + to N !fn N N 0 N !N CO ° _N '.N '(A LL LL LL .LL LL! I!B LL IN N Cl LL 'LL !LL C V R !M ~Y ~tD cD -(D !to O) CA O) -.O di 'M :to f n cD tU N N N :M f C C^ C cc C I C C. C C C Sol C C! C C: O O O! O O O C O O O O m m m m m m U : . m m m_ m m :m m m U y > > U U U U U V m U m m m m m m E :m m :m m, E E :E E E E m E jE E d E E 'E E m o. n a CD ;a oL a m aaim n CL CL Cl `o o n: E o o o N 'o 0 o c o 0 0 .c 0 0 0 0 :c c :c c c :c c 'c o c c c c 2i > CO ID ID V > > L > 4) 4) > c > > !C > > i> > :0 0 U U ':U U U > 'U U U 'U m m m a m m m w m m m ;w m m m m° m Et 0 O:0 0 0 .0 m in '0 0 'm 0 0 0 0 !m E 1E E E 'N E E E E of m (o m m! m a m l'm A a ~o m; m ns E O O io D 0 i° ID o o !O a a - - le o o _i o'o 0 ae ,lz al! at -.t -.e o eo 0 o 0 0 o o to 0 0 o o :C) 0 o !o o o 0 0 0 0 IS o :o o io 0 0 :o U! 0 :o 10 o°° 10 o o io 0 0 o o :M o o ! N t0 t0 :to U9 to o LO 'ln tp to to tp 'tn to jtn _Lf) tD 'tp to to Lf) <n Lf) _ M U) Ito O : O :O !O O 'O 'O 'O O O i0 i O O O O O !R O O ~O O `O ~O O O 'O :.O -O 12 O . n aD h (m i n u) ' 0) (D tD ! to O I N tD to O) I f7 a'7 ! rn O) ! O r, M M a") ' C co L r 'N iN :N N N N f0 r N r IN N 'N 1N 'N N N O :.10 an !to LO U.) t0 to !to J - m co O 1D !c0 .tom h O I(D !f~ ;r CO O) m C m 7 O -C C C C m t. LL 7 J C C :'C m "C m mm "C . L 'C c 'C 7 U. F LL LL _tL.IL 'LL F? ;LL ,LL ;'j LL ,j 'LLLL LL i i I > > 10 tp iu) N :t0 W) t0 to U) to N ~t0 10 M <n 10 0 -an t0 t0 U) N itn to 'tn -:o U) !UJ 0 to O i0 O 'O O O O O O O '.O O 10 O 'O O O 'O O ;O O O 'O O :O O :O O O 'O 1 a !CO CO jO M !('7 M A i-v a M r co 'N ~ :ti O N V !0) CO OD 'tn ~ W (O r: jN N !N N :N ;N ;tD N iN N 'N n r IN N N r W in to ' to to to An to u) t to J ; m ; ~ to o j to (o (o m ' m o n r` co . rn Ci C C C! m L lL J J c "C - C C -O m m C c C C O O O O O ~LL LL !lL O m LL m O O O LL !LL LL LL O ' Ij ) U. 3 3 y -;N !N T N -T T T'T T :T T -.T T T T N N TT T -:N N to TT N N N' T I T T l6 T m m m; O W m (a - M to t0 a) T T m: m t0 ca ' T T a) : m T T T c' A to : to a m :v v a iv v :v :v v c v as m o iv v .v m m to :a m m m o; v ;v :v v v 'v v :v a v C' !(N -N t0 N IcD LO M W) O .O IN I i 1 ; I I I I I i I i 1 G U 1 1 ( 1 C ! ~ i i i i _ ~ : 1 U m i 1 ~ ' m j m d E 0- ' aEi ? aci a 1 o m C i '0 E o 'E a o LL g? ..E a E N m °i = c c o ' ~p V m : m i p m N o y $ O U O J a ' c c IQ) CD i= c 15 O O C i-o I T p O m O C N D. y n O O C r ~3•tL•1• Z E v o EL ID 'E > o -.e o W o E c o m o o m E -D CD W i I W W O C .O m 07) p 01 LO a) : E O O n p C0 L 0 N g 'o io o U ° N cmi 0U0 :o E m 'E c U 'm aa)i = v :O N m U N C N Ol :O H:a O O) p N 0 -O m y C: U) W (D 11 E N N' N FNa ' 1-0 N N O ~O ~O a TYCO m N M y p m 'D OL : 'a m c iQ D :Q c n n F- c N o c O N c c- ° 'F m an d :a m j'A E m ;'A m a m E m w E E m E E 'v cf) U- ;LL a E P .0 :.c m- :a J J J n d a - N m m d ;.o m m: T Z j ' ~ ` !0 iL !O LL (n IN (n o 0 O O O O O O n. O 'O S o o LL O o 0 1C9 E (n v Q 0 N 'M 't0 to !1~ CO ;O) !O CV M ~V U) co i~ CO O) 10 ;O r 'CO O O -N iN N N N N N N `N N -.M 'M 1 ' In O \ co L TOWN OF VAIL Vail Building Safety and Inspection Services75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2142 July 11, 2005 Vail Building Safety & Inspection Services Plan Review Corrections List Alpine Standard Gas Station Demolition 13 Vail Road, Vail, Co 81657, BP #D05-0005 Owner: Vail Development LLC. Contractor: TR Construction Inc. # 820-B Corrections are listed below. Sheet Item 1/2 Provide a detailed construction schedule as to what will occur when. Examples: How long will this demolition occur? Is the debris from the demolition going to be removed as it is demolished? When is utility disconnection going to occur? Also it does not appear that all utility lines and disconnections are identified on the submitted documents. When is the final grading and landscaping of the site anticipated? This is just an example of questions that shall be addressed. Please provide a detailed schedule for all phases of the demolition activity. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 Missing Asbestos abatement program. Provide a complete environmental assessment of both structures identifying all elements of the building which contain asbestos or any other hazardous material regulated by the State of Colorado or the Environmental Protection Agency. A demolition permit will not be released until all asbestos abatement has been completed and a clearance report by a qualified agency is received by the Town of Vail showing that all elements of asbestos has been removed per the State of Colorado statutes. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 1/2 Is the existing foundation being removed? If so, provide an excavation plan showing limits of excavation. This shall include excavation depths. How is the excavation being shored? Provide an engineered designed and stamped shoring plan. This plan shall show how the foundation will be removed in a safe fashion reducing the risk of cave-in and assuring adjacent properties are effectively protected. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 1/2 The excavation shall be filled in according to the restoration plan. Quantities of fill material shall be identified for bonding purposes. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 1/2 A grading plan shall be prepared, designed and sealed by a Colorado registered engineering professional. 1/2 An erosion control plan shall be prepared, designed and sealed by a Colorado registered engineering professional. The plans have been submitted; however the Colorado Registered Professional stamp is missing. The above referenced permit shall not be released and has been rejected. The above mentioned corrections shall be addressed in a future submittal. Be aware that corrections from other departments shall also be addressed and the future submittal shall address all corrections from all Town departments. Plans Examiner/ Building Official: Charlie Davis 07/15/2005 04:07 FAX 9702416884 PHASE-CON 1A 002/013 Phase Con ~ O S ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS e ,s ms 1 Town of Vail OFFIrT Cnrl Asbestos Building Materials Inspection Services Client: Capital Real Estate, Minneapolis, Minnesota Project Site; 28 S. Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado (former service station) Phase Con Project 05-05-24D 593 19.75 Road Grand Junction, CO 81503 Phone: (970) 241-6480 Fax: (970) 241-6584 07/15/2005 04:07 FAX 9702416584 PHASE CON 2$ S. Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado Sampling Description 16003/013 COfefc` 0a0eiss Phase Con provided asbestos building material inspection and sampling services at 28 .5. Frontage Road in Vail, Colorado on May 25, 2005. This inspection was construction specific for the planned demolition of the structure. The scope of work included those materials which are regulated by the State of Colorado and the EPA during building demolition, Building materials were grouped into homogeneous areas and material types by visual appearance, location within the building, and apparent age. Discussion & Recommendations techniques or worKer protection demolition work. If unknown o during demolition activities these for potential asbestos content. Disclaimer were W.d,. No special asbestos control will be required for the planned r unusual materials are discovered unknown materials should be tested This inspection was performed using non-invasive sampling techniques. This report does not imply, or guarantee that every material on the property, or in the property building, which may potentially have asbestos as a component has been identified and/or sampled. A guarantee that all asbestos materials have been identified and/or sampled would require cost-prohibitive and destructive sampling protocols. Furthermore, identified asbestos containing materials may be in areas which are inaccessible or hidden due to their application during the construction process and their subsequent enclosure or covering with building and finish materials. Areas behind walls, inside chases, or other hidden, covered or enclosed areas were not included within the scope of this inspection, as destructive techniques would have been required to access these areas. These areas should be inspected whenever renovation or demolition activities are scheduled which may disturb the materials within or beneath these barriers. Abatement cost estimates and material quantity estimates 07/15/2005 04:07 FAX 9702416584 PHASE-CON la 004/013 are approximate only (due to the hidden nature of many of the materials), and are provided only as a general guideline to the client. More than one licensed Colorado State asbestos abatement contractor should be consulted to determine actual abatement costs of the ACBMs described above. Actual material quantities can only be determined by complete removal of covering materials. Dou A. Close C ado State and EPA Certified Asbestos Building I Spector/Management Planner 07/15/2005 04:07 FAX 9702416584 PHASE-CON IM005/019 Sample Description Table 07/15/2005 04:07 FAX 9702416584 PHASE-CON 28 S. Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado Asbestos Sample Description and Location Tables Sample # Sample Descriptions and Locations AS-01 Ceiling Tile - 4X2 Drop In - Main Building Lobby AS-02 Ceiling Tile - 4X2 Drop In Main Building Lobby AS-03 Ceiling Tile - 4X2 Drop In - Main Building Lobby AS-04 Floor Tile - 12X12 - Loft AS-05 Floor Tile - 12X12 - Loft AS-06 Floor Tile - 12X12 - Loft AS-07 Non-Textured Wallboard - Service Area - Ceiling AS-08 Non-Textured Wallboard - Office Ceiling AS-09 Non-Textured Wallboard - Ceiling - Attic Space AS-10 Non-Textured Wallboard - Rear Addition AS-11 Non-Textured Wallboard - Rear Addition AS-12 Non-Textured Wallboard - Rear Addition AS-13 Non-Textured Wallboard - Exterior Soffet Overhang AS-14 Non-Textured Wallboard - Ext Overhang - Pumps AS-15 Non-Textured Wallboard - Exterior Soffet Overhang 0006/013 * ACBM is in bold type 07/15/2005 04:07 FAX 9702416384 PHASE-CON Z007/013 Laboratory Analysis Results 07/15/2005 W08 FAX 9702416584 PHASE-CON la 008/013 Strom Environmental, ~Me Environmental Testing Services tom-' L-'- :.J 7100 N. Broadway Ste. b-S, Denver, CO. 80221 Phone (866)487-4533 Fax (303)487-4534 CLIENT: CLIENT PROJECT PROJECT NAME; ABBREVIATIONS: BULK ASBESTOS SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT NIST/NVLAP LAB #200450-0 PHASECON, INC. 593 19.75 ROAD GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81503 CAPITAL REAL ESTATE SAMPLE TYPE VT-Vinyl Floor Tile FS-Floor Sheedng AC-Acoustical Spray-On CT-Ceiling Tile DJM-Drywall Joint Mud '%P-Wall Plaster GRAN-Granular SEI PROJECT 0505-51 DATE OF RECEIPT: 05-26-05 DATE OF ANALYSIS: 05-27-05 SAMPLED BY; CLIENT PAGE 1 OF 1 ASBESTOS TYPE CHRYS-Chrysotile AMOS-Amosite CROC-Crocidolite TREM-Tremolite NAD-No Asb"ros Detected TRACE-<I% Asbestos MATERIAL TYPE CELL-Cellulose FG-Fibrous Glass AGG-Aggregate NF-Non Fibrous BIN-Binder SYN-Synthetic HH-Horse Hair CLIENT # SEI LAB » SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ASBESTOS OTHER MATERIALS Sample Condition 5anogmeaus AS-01 48596 C1--WHITE, FIBROUS NAD 50%CELL+10%FG i.NF GOOD YES AS-02 48597 CT-WHITE. FIBROUS NAD 5a%CELL+10%FG +NF GOOD YES AS-03 48598 CT-WHITE, FIBROUS NAD 50%CELL+]Q%FG +NF GOOD YES AS-04A 48599A VT-GREY, VINYL NAD 1005%)3INDER GOOD NO AS-04B 4659913 VT MASTIC-CLEAR, ADHESIVE NAD 100%ADHESIVE GOOD NO AS-05A 48600A VT-GREY, VINYL NAD 1009bBINDER GOOD NO AS-05D 48600D VT MASTIC-CLEAR, ADHESIVE NAD 100%ADHESIVE GOOD NO AS-06A 48601A VT-GREY, VINYL NAD 10096BINDER GOOD NO AS-0613 4860113 VT MASTIC-CLEAR, ADHESIVE NAD 100%ADHESIVE GOOD NO AS-07 48602 BULK-GREY, GRAN NAD 10%CELL+AGG GOOD YES AS-08 48603 BULK-WHITE, GRAN NAD 10%CELL+AGG GOOD YES AS-09 48604 BULK-GREY, GRAN NAD 15%CELL+AGG GOOD YES AS-10 48605 BULK-TAN, GRAN NAD 15%CELL+AGG GOOD YES AS-11 48606 BULK-WHITE. GRAN NAD 15%CELL+AGG GOOD YES AS.12 48607 BULK-WHITE. GRAN NAD 15%CELL+AGG GOOD YES AS-13 48608 BULK-BROWN, GRAN NAD 10%CELL+3%FG +AGG GOOD YES AS-14 48609 BULK-BROWN, GRAN NAD 10%CELL+3%FG +AGG GOOD YES AS-15 48610 BULK-BROWN, GRAN NAD 109bCELL+3%FCs +AGG GOOD YES METHOD: Polarized Light Microscopy, EPA Method 600/R-93/116 DETECTION LIMIT: I% 7- ANALYST: os Larytrom Authorized Signature: La t altnstrom/ erector ✓rhis report pcr'Ajm only to the hems tested. Tbls report may not be reproduced except In full witb prrmiaston of SEI. This report cannot be used by the cllem to c)eim product endorsement by NVLAP or any Agebcy or the U.S. Government, Floor Tile sampks may yidd "False Nagadvc" (<19b) asheswa due to the size of asbestos fibers. Dcrinitlve results can be obtained by TEht or SEM analysis. SEI recommends re•aaalysis by point count(ror more accurate quantiGeation) or TENI Mslysls(for enhanced detectlon) for materials regulated by EPA NFSHAPS and conwlning leas than ten peree.0<109b) mberom by Polarised Light(PL". Botb swigs are available for an additlonal rem- 07/15/2005 04:08 FAX 9702416584 PHASE-CON I A009/013 Certificates 07/15/2005 04:08 FAX 9702416584 PHASE-CON STATE OF COLORADO Expires on: 1112912005 CA APCD Repteeentatlve 1 1 fa 010/013 ' This certtf 4Wt& is valld oply with the possuslon of a current llivlsion-approved training coarse ceMflaotlon in fire dlsolpUde specified above. 07/15/2005 04:08 FAX 9702416584 PHASE-CON la 011/013 STATE OF 'COLOR.ADO ASBESTOS CERTIFICATION* Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Cuutrol Division This certifies that Douglas A. Close Certification No: 2930 has met the requirements of 25-7-507, CA.S. and Air Quality Control Commission Regulation No. 8, Part B, and is hereby certified by the state of Colorado in the following discipline: Air Monitoring Specialist* Issued: 1/6/2005 Expires on: 12/10/2005 Representative " Thu eerelfkate is valid only with the possession of a current Division-approved rraining course ce-Oca lon in the dircipllne specified above 07/15/2005 04:09 FAX 9702416584 PHASE-CON la 012/013 07/15/2005 04:10 FAX 9702416584 PHASE-CON la 013/013 4y, ~Q ~ yN s0• 4 ~ r. ago V `a g c r V~ w H Z ~ a fl W, c V~ 3 N CA C ~ ~ ~i.9ws x z N 42 o~ a ° ° 0 ° - U ~ U a c o r h v E E u E E o° co B o fw':I N ~Ir 0 3 NI N LL v ~r ' r N N c r~ v 1 NCI l LL N rl r olri claL 1 I N o it x,31 l i Imo' N NiLL. oir U m N ~ d ~i3 oI ~1 C f~ O ~3 (n INj - - f O Li i. a _ro iy~ o ~ 0 0 - V 9 0 m o o O a Q O N ° O ° c O m o _ a m a 9 0 v - N m LL a ° ` U c E _ a U - m O 0 O > at o n g m a c 30 O r m ° 9 I n m $ o E = ° r - ~ ~a o a a c o o c > i u o O O o e - U a a 3 s€ O m u m c E o a c n - N E E ° o n o o q m m L 0 c N - E m m _ n a ILL a A c ~ C N 16 > c W ~ n° a a - Q O a n - _ v o 0 E c - o .a o o a E a a 0 o W a o > a" LL o ° ° a m ° > > -/1 o° E - a o a ~ ° E U q a E v° ' 3 c m o N ep o n 0 a v n m _ ° c 9 LL n a a v° n o ~ o °a O ~ m c v _ O E O LO o O M ~ lm-. w In l~ ° a~:T O C O U P v u L'. U c C y C!: U 0 a- c 0 0 E a) 0 c 0 U) w a) Cl) 0 LL I . a S o U 1 I i c o c ' : `o n I i i LO 0 c~ r; a~ 0 o ' A er O 10 O ~1 a `o W .t c c an o ~ u - ' o E c u ❑ mli. ~ E f a m n O V O E o 0 U ~ 1 J'~ i3 _ m I Jul 13 2005 15:05 TRCONSTRUCTION PeSQ&JSt T.R. CONSTRUCTION, INC. 114 Troy Hill Road OCIP Colorado Springs, CO. 80916 Iwo C6fj of4 Phone: 719-5744)020 Fax: 719-! It E-Mail: TRCONST@MSN.COM 13 July 2005 Town of Vail Town of Vail 42 West Meadow Drive h Vail, CO 81657 Subject: Demolition Plan for 28 S. Frontage Rd and 13 V 7195740020 p.2 Pe°'~D This plan describes the methodology for the demolition, removal and subsequent offsite disposal of the existing buildings, recycling of on site concrete and identifying potential safety hazards. • Coordinate permitting with Colorado State Department of Health and Environment. • Coordinate permitting with Town of Vail. • Coordinate with effected utilities for capping or removal of services no longer required. Contact Utility Notification Center of Colorado for complete locate of known utilities within site perimeter. • Coordinate with property owners for installation of construction site fence. • Coordinate for installation of erosion control measures (silt fence/straw bale,etc). • Coordinate for evacuation of fluids on HVAC equipment. • Coordinate for underground storage tank (ust) pumping, removal and closure with contractor, local and state authorities. • Using Town of Vail approved fire hydrant and meter, provide water for demolition site to control dust and fire control. • Physically inspect structure(s) before demolition to ensure all personnel are clear of area. • Proceed with demolition of 28 South Frontage Road, former service station first followed by UST removal. • Demolition to proceed from top down (roof to foundation). • Commence demolition of former hotel structure. • Demolition to proceed from top down (roof to foundation). • Remove all demolition debris to Lake County Landfill, South Canyon Landfill or Summit County Waste Facility. Anticipated trucks used daily will be eight (8) completing three to four (34) roundtrips daily. Truck count will be reduced according to estimated amounts of debris remaining during final cleanup. No stationary rolloff containers will be used. Demol' n - Excava n dIities - u c -ddr Jul 13 2005 15:05 7195740020 p.3 TA CONSTRUCTION, INC. 114 Troy Hill Road Colorado Springs, CO. 80916 Phone: 719-57440020 Fax: 719-5740021 &Mail: TRCONSTCMSN.COM • Demolish and load concrete foundations and flatwork for Town of Vail street department. Concrete to be crushed for recycle use will be broken down to a 3/4" minus. Concrete to be used for backfill on site will be broken down to 6" minus. Estimated quantity for backfilling basement, swimming pool and any voids to bring to proposed grade is approximately 5500 cubic yards. Portable crusher to be staged on site. Removal of foundations and slabs will not require any shoring or stabilization and removal of basement walls will be immediately followed by embankment stabilization. • Rough grade site to ensure proper drainage and leave safe site. • All CDOT and local regulations to be adhered. Follow egress/ingress traffic plans per site plan. Ensure all vehicles entering or exiting job site do not track debris onto roadways. Ensure all loads exiting site are properly secured and pose no danger to pedestrian or vehicular traffic. • All federal, state and local environmental regulations to be adhered. • All federal, state and local safety regulations to be adhered. • Work tentatively scheduled to commence 18 July 2005 and be completed by 12 August 2005. Chuck Turns Demo on - Excava ' a tilities - c TRCONSTRUCTION Jul 15 2005 10:32 TRCONSTRUCTION 114 Troy Hill Road Colorado Springs, Colorado 80916 Phone: 719-574-0020 Fax: 719-574-0021 V - rte` L 7195740020 OMfreylo#j ST -r, a- c,0 s C7- a- N . C a rte. ~T< Town of Vail Fax Transmittal Form F~- Ts~~#~il S Fram Attention Date Phone Fax Number Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply Message: M k f~ ~CT-4;-- `C- I C- S C` Q~- Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet 15, , n.~ Q-l X - N-k-- a T. Q. Conetruellon, Inc. P~ 0, O00 p.I '3-1 J _ „n Jul 15 2005 10:32 TRCONSTRUCTION 7195740020 p.2 0,6/30/2005 W38 FAX 9702418584 PHASE_CDN 2003/003 Phase Con ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS )une 30, 2005 Mr. Robert Johannes CDPHE Denver, Colorado Mr. Johannes: The signed CDPHE demolition permit application form for the building M~ at 934 South Frontage Road in Vall, Colorado had the incorrect address for the building to be demolished. The corEgG address j.L8 South Frgntl9l d In Vail Colorado. Please accept this FAXed letter (which will follow by mall) as ver ca ion of the address error, Please contact me with any questions which you may have. Thank you. Sincerely, K01 COPY 4as A. Close lorado State Asbestos Materials Building Inspector #2930 59319,75 Road Grand Junction, CO 81503 Phone: (970) 241-6480 Fax: (970) 241-6584 Jul 15 2005 10:32 TRCONSTRUCTION 7195740020 p.4 Submit Corm to: . OF'~, t hermit Coordinator DEM6.ITION PERMIT APPLICATION)?-URM Colorado Dept. of Publlo Health tee" A $55 FEE MUST ACCOMPANY THIS FORM. and Hnvirnrunent aPCD-SS-e1 * * INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL BE RETURNED. 4300. Cherry Creek Drive Soulh nve CO, 6026-I * >r r 76 (Permit will be mailed to demolition contractor unless specified otherwise) phon e:'303-M-431 0030 Fax: 303-702-D2T8 Comany 8uildinp N me Year Constructed Street T of B Idling (I.e. residential, warehouse, office buckling, e F S Zip Code street iA j Tale hone Wkh Area s O City v • State County J 71p Code I o - - 0c, ; '0 a I co Ea tT e- glo Pro)ect r b 1~ Call Phone Number wilts Area Code Propos d Start ate l 17 Prop mpletlo Dots a Q'i N Name 0 e Name $lre Street ~ , J I P' City Ste Zip Code ? City Sta Zip Code p Telephone { Area Cods O Tele one)With A Code Inspector's name -Note: Signature Is required below- General Abatement Contractor (t3AC) pockaks s Addresa CDPHE Asbestos Permit Number I 51 3 `er 3 E City eta t Zip Code ' Total Quantity of Asbestos Removed Gr. o 8/5 0 C Colo. Carl. er Expiretlon Date a Date Removal Completed 2 Nu 3c? Ir Zq DS V Date(s) of Inspection Te isp With Area Code Telephone With Area Code S ZS p 7v - Z4'/ Ofo With my slgralure below, I certify that I possess current AHERA and elate of Colorado cartMlcaft as an Asbestos Building Inspector. I also certify that I h In d h b ild t I verffy that all rebipsraMs from air condittonlnyhefrlggesration appliances have ave spec e t e u ing to be demolished, ail I®ted In the Demoiltion Site =fly recovered In accordance with AQCC Regulation No. 15 (For 6 block above, sampled all cusped materials (In accordance with AHERA), had Information on CFC requirements call 882.3100). . O all samples analyzed for Uts presence of asbestos by a NVLAP accredited laboratory, and have determined tat (cheek appropfiew box and sign in CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX: BLUE INK): Id . C No ACM exists anywhere In the building. O V FBulkbg Owner - The only ACM doff In the building Is non-Mable VAT and/or taMrnpregnaled ra v OR moting felt and theme well remain non-triable dudnp demolition. AN trlabie ACM, or ACM that may be rendered triable during damoNOon, that I m 1 foumd has been oomplatety removed from this building. per my visual 1nopoedon. S X1 Contractor ' ~j Date of Final Inspection S' ~ ets Signature m Printed Name r Ctos p~ THis Box is FOR CDPHE USE ONLY: Permit Postmark or Hand Delivery Date: Check Issued: 60O pss7 Rev.SM J1Aabealm and Laad UnkdAobeatoa FormaMBEStT06 ASATEAmENT NOTIFICATION,doa sg~- a-~ ~ f i 4 ((0 s Jul 15 2005 10:32 TRCONSTRUCTION 7195740020 P.5 olorado D lrtment of Public Health an(. n Air Pollution Control Division - Stationary Sources Program Indoor Air Unit 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, APCD-SS-131 Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 Phone: 303-692-3100 - Fax: 303-782-0278 E-mail: asbestos@state.co.us DEMOLIT This approval notice is Regulation No. 8, Part Colorado Air Pollution This notice signifies th demolition contractor Environment pursuant: As a contractor, you nW, r 5~ the requirements of th4 Colorado Department of strongly suggests that y( any other local buildings THE ORIGINAL NOTICE crdai gntrol Commission "MvpiW Wer '18, 20:~ves March 21 2005, the and tintrta~l , nd 25-7-501 et seq). r an S w a 4" P, Gam; Cs and the F l ' ' tt~ k f Public Health and Y } C t tp tlex• derio1itit,icerzs~d depending on . r' "IlltS, d: naepal'`in the A!' I ing performed. The 1 A-AP ttr EnvQ~?t,lr'ol Control Division, r~ eo ty am a tQ es in order to determine AT ALL TIMES. Immediately notify the Unit of project modri,ntiii[ 'rnber above) or e-mail (address above) and the appropriate county health department by fax. Project modifications include changes in the scope of work or the scheduled work dates, etc. This demolition notice is valid beginning 7/5/2005 through 11:59 PM on 10/5/2005. The actual scheduled work dates are from 7/5/2005 through 10/5/2005. Approval issued on: 6/20/2005 ._.Record number..4b995 Notice Number: 05EA2639D For the location specified below: 934 S Frontage Rd Vail J co 01 to s 9- Eagle County This notice has been issued to: T.R. Construction Inc 114 Troy Hill Rd Colorado Springs, CO 80916 Amount Paid: $55.00 ck number: 24282 Asbestos Building Inspector: Douglas A. Close Cerification No.: 2930 Inspection Date: 05/25/2005 l Iss r TOWN OF VAIL Vail Building Safety and Inspection Services75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2142 July 11, 2005 Revised July 19,2005 Vail Building Safety & Inspection Services Plan Review Corrections List Alpine Standard Gas Station Demolition 13 Vail Road, Vail, Co 81657, BP #D05-0005 Owner: Vail Development LLC. Contractor: TR Construction Inc. # 820-B Town of Vail Response are in Bold Corrections are listed below. Sheet 1/2 Provide a detailed construction schedule as to what will occur when. Examples: How long will this demolition occur? Is the debris from the demolition going to be removed as it is demolished? When is utility disconnection going to occur? Also it does not appear that all utility lines and disconnections are identified on the submitted documents. (Still outstanding, but being worked out with utility companies) When is the final grading and landscaping of the site anticipated? This is just an example of questions that shall be addressed. Please provide a detailed schedule for all phases of the demolition activity. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 Missing Asbestos abatement program. Provide a complete environmental assessment of both structures identifying all elements of the building which contain asbestos or any other hazardous material regulated by the State of Colorado or the Environmental Protection Agency. A demolition permit will not be released until all asbestos abatement has been completed and a clearance report by a qualified agency is received by the Town of Vail showing that all elements of asbestos has been removed per the State of Colorado statutes. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 1/2 Is the existing foundation being removed? If so, provide an excavation plan showing limits of excavation. This shall include excavation depths. How is the excavation being shored? Provide an engineered designed and stamped shoring plan. This plan shall show how the foundation will be removed in a safe fashion reducing the risk of cave-in and assuring adjacent properties are effectively protected. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 1/2 The excavation shall be filled in according to the restoration plan. Quantities of fill material shall be identified for bonding purposes. This Item has been addressed and no longer is required to be corrected. See submitted document. 7/18/05 1/2 A grading plan shall be prepared, designed and sealed by a Colorado registered engineering professional. Additional drawings have been received sealed by Colorado Registered Engineer 7/19/05. 1/2 An erosion control plan shall be prepared, designed and sealed by a Colorado registered engineering professional. The plans have been submitted; however the Colorado Registered Professional stamp is missing. Additional drawings have been received sealed by Colorado Registered Engineer 7/19/05. The above referenced permit shall not be released and has been rejected. The above mentioned corrections shall be addressed in a future submittal. Be aware that corrections from other departments shall also be addressed and the future submittal shall address all corrections from all Town departments. Plans Examiner/ Building Official: Charlie Davis TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ELECTRICAL PERMIT Permit E07-0169 301 -aGti_5 Job Address: 3094 BOOTH FALLS RD VAIL Status . ISSUED Location.....: BOOTH FALLS MOUNTAIN HOMES UNIT 8 Applied 08/08/2007 Parcel No...: 210102302010 Issued . 08/10/2007 Project No Z 1 Expires . 02/06/2008 OWNER WISOR, JANICE P. & DEE P. 08/08/2007 7062 S NEWPORT ST CENTENNIAL CO 80112 APPLICANT OTTO'S ELECTRICAL SERVICE, I08/08/2007 Phone: (970) 328-9382 PO BOX 4029 EAGLE COLORADO 81631 License: 372-E CONTRACTOR OTTO'S ELECTRICAL SERVICE, I08/08/2007 Phone: (970) 328-9382 PO BOX 4029 EAGLE COLORADO 81631 License: 372-E Desciption: ELECTRICAL FOR ENCLOSED EXISTING DECK Valuation: $0.00 Square feet: 66 FEE SUMMARY Electrical > $51.75 Total Calculated Fees--> $54.75 DRB Fee--------- > $0.00 Additional Fees > $0.00 Investigation > $0.00 Total Permit Fee--------> $54.75 Will Call > $3 . 00 Payments > $54 .75 TOTAL FEES--> $54 .75 BALANCE DUE--------> $0.00 Approvals: Item: 060 00 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT 08/ 08/2007 shahn Action: AP Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. i t APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIG (Q 6. 7/ Project / Building Permit - DO *VA1 Electrical Permit TO970-479-2149 (Inspections) 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 TOWN OF VAIL ELECTRICAL PERMIT APPLICATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Eleptrical Contractor: Town of V Contact Person and Phone #'s: b . E-Mail Address: U f~ < Fax#: F Contractor Signature i " COMPLETE SQ. FOOTAGE FOR AREA OF WORK AND VALUATION OF WORK (Labor & Materials) AMOUNT OF SQ FT IN STRUCTURE: ~~11 ELECTRICAL VALUATION: $ / Contact Eaa/e Countv Assessors Office at 970-328-8640 or visit www, eaale-countv com for Parcel # Parcel # p 1[3obName: Job Address: : - Legal Description Lot: 1 1 Block: Filing: Subdivision: Owners Name: 11 Address; 11 0 54. < ' 'til Phone:-:: 7, 7 / .1. 3 Engineer: Address: Phone: Detailed description of work: I,: i ~L<t ~~'~c ( f Work Class: New Addition Remodel( Repair ( ) Temp Power ( ) Other ( ) Work Type: Interior O Exterior ( ) Both( ) Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes( ) No ) Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Duplex ( ) Multi-family ( ) Commercial( ) Restaurant( ) Other( ) of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: Fwo- No. of Accommodation Units in this building: Is this permit for a hot tub: Yes No Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes( ) No Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes( ) No ) D ****************************FOR OFFICE USE ONLY****** n II Other Fees: Date Received: DRB Fees: Accepted B : TOWN U Planner Sign-off: = VAIL f F:\cdev\FORMS\PERMITS\Building\electical,permit_31-23-2005-DOC Page 1 of 2 11/23/2005 TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ELECTRICAL PERMIT Job Address: 184 BEAVER DAM RD VAIL Location.....: 184 BEAVER DAM ROAD Parcel No...: 210107113007 Project No -0360 OWNER WHITE ROCK BEAVER DAM LLC 08/09/2007 PO BOX 3546 LITTLE ROCK AK 72203 APPLICANT BIG BEAR ELECTRIC, INC. 08/09/2007 P. 0. BOX 474 LEADVILLE CO 80461 License: 291-E CONTRACTOR BIG BEAR ELECTRIC, INC. 08/09/2007 P. 0. BOX 474 LEADVILLE CO 80461 License: 291-E Permit E07-0171 1&c' Status ISSUED Applied..: 08/09/2007 Issued . 08/09/2007 Expires. 02/05/2008 Phone: 970-390-9221 Phone: 970-390-9221 Desciption: TEMPORARY POWER FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PRIMARY/SECONDARY RESIDENCE Valuation: $500.00 Square feet: 100 FEE SUMMARY Electrical > $51.75 Total Calculated Fees--> $54.75 DRB Fee--------- > $0.00 Additional Fees > $0.00 Investigation > $0.00 Total Permit Fee--------> $54.75 Will Call > $3.00 Payments > $54.75 TOTAL FEES--> $54.75 BALANCE DUE--------> $0.00 Approvals: Item: 06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT 08/09/2007 shahn Action: AP Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. SIGNATURE OF,OWNER OR COKTR)i~TOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R070001475 Amount: $54.75 08/09/200701:11 PM Payment Method: Check Init: LT Notation: Big Bear Electric / ck 5722 Permit No: E07-0171 Type: ELECTRICAL PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-1300-7 Site Address: 184 BEAVER DAM RD VAIL Location: 184 BEAVER DAM ROAD Total Fees: $54.75 This Payment: $54.75 Total ALL Pmts: $54.75 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts EP 00100003111100 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 51.75 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00 APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIGNED Project#: eiZtQ?6- 0"60 Building Permit 1249'- a.3S- *VA&I Electrical Permit ~ 970-479-2149 (Inspections) TM 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 TOWN OF VAIL ELECTRICAL PERMIT APPLICATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Electrical Contractor: Town of Vail Reg. No.: Contact Peter on and Phone #'s: t r - Cie c444 - C, ~9'c' Z! E-Mai Address: Are t ,V Fax#: ( ,-Cl) _ Contractor Signature: COMPLETE SQ. FOOTAGE FOR AREA OF WORK AND VALUATION OF WORK (Labor & Materials) AMOUNT OF SQ FT IN STRUCTURE: ELECTRICAL VALUATION: $ Contact EaWe Countv Assessors Office at 970-328-8640 or visit www. eagle-county, com for Parcel # Parcel # 2 v 7 3Ci Job Name: Job Address: ' Legal Description Lot: Block: Filing: Subdivision: Owners Name: Address: -yam Phone: /y) 06 Engineer: Address: Phone: Detailed description of work: Lgan:;41y Work Class: New ( Addition ( ) Remodel( ) ) Repair ( ) Temp Power ) Other( Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior) Both ( ) 11 Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes( ) No ) Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Duplex Multi-family ( ) ) Commercial( ) Restaurant( ) Other( No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: No. of Accommodation Units in this building: Is this permit for a hot tub: Yes No Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes( ) No k), 11 Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes( ) No ) *************/*****************FOR OFFICE USE ONLY*********** DRB Fees. Accepted By: r Other Fees: Date Received: Planner r F:\cdev\FORMS\PERMITS\Bui ldi ng\e1ertica1_permit_11-23-2005-DOC Page 1 of 2 WN OF VAIL 11/23/2005 TOWN OF ViK, Amendment to the 2002 N.E.C. Town of Vail Ordinance 4. Series of 2005 ❑ Overhead services are not allowed in the Town of Vail. ❑ Underground services shall be in conduit (PVC) from the utility transformer to the electric meter, main disconnect switch, and to the first electrical distribution circuit breaker panel. ❑ The main disconnect switch shall be readily accessible, and located next to the meter on the exterior wall of the structure. All underground conduits are required to be inspected before back-filling the trench. ❑ In multi-family dwelling units, no electrical wiring or feeder cables shall pass from one unit to another. Common walls and spaces are exempt. ❑ NM Cable (Romex) can be used only in single and multi-family dwellings net exceeding 3 stories Type NM cannot be used in any building mixed with Type A,B.E,F,H,I,M &S occupancies ❑ Aluminum conductors smaller than size #8 are not permitted with the Town of Vail. TOWN OF VAIL ELECTRICAL PERMIT GUIDELINES ❑ All installations of exterior hot tubs or spa's require a DRB approval from planning. This application will not be accepted without a copy of the DRB approval form attached (if applicable). ❑ If this permit is for installation of an exterior hot tub or spa on a new elevated platform or deck over 30" above grade, you must also obtain a building permit. ❑ If this permit is for installation of an exterior hot tub or spa on any existing deck or elevated platform, a structural engineer must review the existing condition and verify that it will support the added concentrated load. Please provide a copy of the structural engineers wet stamped letter or drawing with this application. ❑ If this is a remodel in a multi-family building with a homeowners association, a letter of permission from the association is required. ❑ If this permit is for a commercial space, two (2) sets of stamped drawings are required. Electrical one-line and panel schedules are required if load is added or distribution is altered. I have, read and understand the above. Signature Date Signed If you have any questions regarding the above information or have additional questions, please contact the Town of Vail Electrical Inspector at 970-479-2147. The inspector can be reached on Monday thru Friday mornings between the hours of Sam and 9am. You may also leave a voice mail and the inspector will call you back. F:\cdev\FORMS\PERMITS\Building\elecbcal-permit 11-23-2005.DOC Page 2 of 2 11/23/2005 TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ELECTRICAL PERMIT 07/12/2007 - 6 cck(~ Job Address: I VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: 13 VAIL ROAD Parcel No...: 210107101016 Project No OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT LUDVIK ELECTRIC CO 3900 S. TELLER STREET LAKEWOOD COLORADO 80235 License: 167-E CONTRACTOR LUDVIK ELECTRIC CO 3900 S. TELLER STREET LAKEWOOD COLORADO 80235 License: 167-E Permit E07-0126 Status ISSUED Applied..: 07/12/2007 Issued . 08/09/2007 Expires. 02/05/2008 07/12/2007 Phone: (303) 781-9601 07/12/2007 Phone: (303) 781-9601 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS-COMPLETE ELECTRICAL WORK FOR THE HOTEL Valuation: 8,684,007.00 Square feet: 0 #*###########k#####*###*#**#*###***k***#*###*#*#***##*#*###*####### FEE SUMMARY ##**#######k#######k##########*#**###########*########*##### Electrical > 169, 989.50 Total Calculated Fees--> 169, 992.50 DRB Fee--------- > $0.00 Additional Fees > $0.00 Investigation > $0.00 Total Permit Fee--------> 169, 992.50 Will Call > $3 . 00 Payments > 169, 992.50 TOTAL FEES--> 169, 992 .50 BALANCE DUE--------> $0.00 Approvals: Item: 06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT 08/06/2007 jplano Action: AP Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT Approved with the additional work to the pi CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. OF OWNI R OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER r\1Un t= IIFIJ 6/9 la 7 APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIGNED Project#• 0if, 2~2 D Building Permit - Electrical Permit l ILL « 970-479-2149 (Inspections) TOWN QFV~ c 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 TOWN OF VAIL ELECTRICAL PERMIT APPLICATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Electrical Contractor: Town of Vail Reg. No.: Contact Person and Phone #'s: Zaal, /67 c~ a E-Mail Address: /r 111'M Fax#: -36 3 _ 7'83- COMPLETE SQ. AREA OF WORK AND VALUATION OF WORK (Labor & Materials) AMOUNT OF SQ FT IN STRUCTURE: cs a ELECTRICAL VALUATION: $ V 96 '7 ^~..a~~a ~..~a, n ....a., w...,.........,~ niF..a -F 07n-21712-BACQ12 nr vicit 1Aiunv CFinlrP-rnllnty rnm fnr Parce/ Parcel # 2 r 6 71 d 10 d Job Name: ~Q ~E~e~/c ~G c Sd..1 v `Sd .7~ .fl Job Address: / g 12 1- Block: Subdivision: Legal Description Lotr 0 ners NF?.: Address y Sam, s n~ Phone: Engineer: Addr ss:. ~~b SO'°'"t 113k s~_rSd~ n~ .a,,io a ZJ1 Phone: sv 7--F - SJSS' Detailed description of work: i!!r> S1-"mss i✓~xt ~~~~6~.-n G?A~~`~~.o~• ~d~ . 3/'r4 Work Class: New Addition ( ) Remodel( ) Repair ( ) Temp Power ( ) Other ( ) I Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Both Dd Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes ) No ( ) Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Duplex ( ) Multi-family ( ) Commercial 94 Restaurant ( ) Other ( ) No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: No. of Accommodation Units in this building: Fi-sthis permit for a hot tub: Yes No Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes ( ) No Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes ( ) No ~C/~rv f'~%tF ~LA~M Jy s-f~ss-, c~.•~1 rb% ~=J"yaGrs~ lu . 61- /Gr zz r~ n Cl l7 fry **************************************FOR OFFICE USE ONL OtherTees. ~DRB"Fees . K Acceted B - ~ ~£PlannerSi n=off. • _ s~,4 , ~ r F:\cdev\FORMS\PERMITS\Building\electical-permit_11-23-2005. DOC Page 1 of 2 11/23/2005 7y~nn~/~~~7,~rt t 1U~11 Vf YAiL Amendment to the 2002 N.E.C. Town of Vail Ordinance 4. Series of 2005 ❑ Overhead services are not allowed in the Town of Vail. o Underground services shall be in conduit (PVC) from the utility transformer to the electric meter, main disconnect switch, and to the first electrical distribution circuit breaker panel. o The main disconnect switch shall be readily accessible, and located next to the meter on the exterior wall of the structure. All underground conduits are required to be inspected before back-filling the trench. ❑ In multi-family dwelling units, no electrical wiring or feeder cables shall pass from one unit to another. Common walls and spaces are exempt ❑ NM Cable (Romex) can be used only in single and multi-family dwellings net exceeding 3 stories Type NM cannot be used in any building mixed with Type A,B.E,F,H,I,M &S occupancies ❑ Aluminum conductors smaller than size #8 are not permitted with the Town of Vail. TOWN OF VAIL ELECTRICAL PERMIT GUIDELINES o All installations of exterior hot tubs or spa's require a DRB approval from planning. This application will not be accepted without a copy of the DRB approval form attached (if applicable). o If this permit is for installation of an exterior hot tub or spa on a new elevated platform or deck over 30" above grade, you must also obtain a building permit. ❑ If this permit is for installation of an exterior hot tub or spa on any existing deck or elevated platform, a structural engineer must review the existing condition and verify that it will support he added concentrated load. Please provide a copy of the structural engineers wet stamped letter or drawing with this application. ❑ If this is a remodel in a multi-family building with a homeowners association, a letter of permission from the association is required. ❑ If this permit is for a commercial space, two (2) sets of stamped drawings are required. 'E/ectrica/ one-line and pane/ schedules are required if load is added or distribution is altered. I have rei)d and understand the above. /Z~/Zr7 -iSignature Date Signed if you have any questil ns regarding the above information or have additional questions, please contact the Town of Vail Electrical Inspector at 970-479-2147. The inspector can be reached on Monday thru Friday mornings between the hours of Sam and 9am. You may also leave a voice mail and the inspector will call you back. F:\cdev\FORMS\PERMrTS\Building\electical-Pertnit_l1-23-2005.DOC Page 2 of 2 11/23/2005 r TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R070001227 Amount: $169,992.50 07/12/200703:50 PM Payment Method: Check Init: JS Notation: 103256/LUDVIK ELECTRIC Permit No: E07-0126 Type: ELECTRICAL PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 13 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 169,992.50 This Payment: $169,992.50 Total ALL Pmts: 169,992.50 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts EP 00100003111100 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 169,989.50 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00 TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ELECTRICAL PERMIT Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-1 VAIL ROAD Parcel No...: 210107101016 Project No e3b 5 U ~(L 6 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 02/27/2007 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT LUDVIK ELECTRIC CO 02/27/2007 3900 S. TELLER STREET LAKEWOOD COLORADO 80235 License: 167-E CONTRACTOR LUDVIK ELECTRIC CO 02/27/2007 3900 S. TELLER STREET LAKEWOOD COLORADO 80235 License: 167-E Permit E07-0021 Status ISSUED Applied 02/27/2007 Issued . 03/16/2007 Expires . 09/12/2007 Phone: (303) 781-9601 Phone: (303) 781-9601 Desciption: TEMPORARY ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR PROJECT. INCLUDES TEMPORARY SERVICE, POWER FOR THE DEWATERING AND TEMPORARY FOR THE BUILDING Valuation: $260,000.00 Square feet: 0 FEE SUMMARY Electrical > $5,439.50 Total Calculated Fees--> $5,442.50 DRB Fee--------- > $0.00 Additional Fees > $0.00 Investigation > $0.00 Total Permit Fee--------> $5,442.50 Will Call > $3.00 Payments- > $5,442.50 TOTAL FEES--> $5,442.50 BALANCE DUE--------> $0.00 Approvals: Item: 06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT 03/15/2007 JCHILDS Action: AP Approved temporary power. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE DE TWENTY-F HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R070000290 Amount: $5,442.50 03/16/200701:45 PM Payment Method: Check Init: LC Notation: #101047/LUDVIK ELECTRIC ---------7------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: E07-0021 Type: ELECTRICAL PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL-1 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: $5,442.50 This Payment: $5,442.50 Total ALL Pmts: $5,442.50 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts EP 00100003111100 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 5,439.50 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00 W 2c. -31J-101 Q APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSI %S 4 v Project Building Permit ' OElectrical Permit 07 - C1(9Zr T'OWF07o Cot Z!) 970-479-2149 (Inspections) 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 Electrical Contractor: L.vrN I K E Lk, Cf A-t E-Mail Address: I^ ko ((is C ( t Contractor Signature: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Town of Vail Reg. No.: 1(01-e ]I RICK 161_Lk Fax#: 3 v 3 -78 3- 4 3 I FEB 2 200 'I u Wki F COMPLETE SQ. FOOTAGE FOR AREA OF WORK AND VALUATION OF WORK (Labor & Materials) AMOUNT OF SQ FT IN STRUCTURE: ELECTRICAL VALUATION: $ Z 000.oc%' Contact Eaa/e Countv Assessors Office at 970-32B-8640 or visit www. eagle-county. com for Parcel # Parcel # D 0 Job Name: F0 U f2, SE W!ZooN S R. ESo f F-T Job Address: Alt-- AD Legal Description Lot: Block: Filing: LSubdivision: Owners Name: VI4tu--T~)EJL_(.0A Address: Phone: 12_ 313-b 12'j Engineer: 11 Address: Phone: Detailed description of work: 7&r, Po (L ?,,x EL, -T(z-i~,~ b (L ~tto? eLT _ ~Ne LvI) E S f2- 9- Titf-- TarwPo~L7 SEYL,vIC,E, ~a~l~EUJATt-xz.iNG A-N~ 'b T~Po2~art-Y V1t- 0 tm a Work Class: New Addition ( ) Remodel( ) Repair ( ) Temp Power (V'~ Other ( ) Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Both P; es an EHU exist at this location: Yes( ) No Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Duplex ( ) Multi-family ( ) Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: No. of Accommodation Units in this building: Is this permit for a hot tub: Yes No Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes( ) No ( Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes( ) No (LT ***********,**********************FOR OFFICE USE ONLY********x******x******xx****,~** Other Fees: Date Received: DRB Fees: t ted B : Planner Sign-off: F:\cdev\FORMS\Permits\Building\electical_permit_I 1-23-2005.DOC Page 1 of 2 11/23/2005 ,TOWN OVfik Amendment to the 2002 N.E.C. Town of Vail Ordinance 4, Series of 2005 ❑ Overhead services are not allowed in the Town of Vail. ❑ Underground services shall be in conduit (PVC) from the utility transformer to the electric meter, main disconnect switch, and to the first electrical distribution circuit breaker panel. ❑ The main disconnect switch shall be readily accessible, and located next to the meter on the exterior wall of the structure. All underground conduits are required to be inspected before back-filling the trench. ❑ In multi-family dwelling units, no electrical wiring or feeder cables shall pass from one unit to another. Common walls and spaces are exempt. ❑ NM Cable (Romex) can be used only in single and multi-family dwellings not exceeding 3 stories Type NM cannot be used in any building mixed with Type A,B,E,F,H,I,M &S occupancies. ❑ Aluminum conductors smaller than size #8 are not permitted. TOWN OF VAIL ELECTRICAL PERMIT GUIDELINES ❑ All installations of exterior hot tubs or spa's require a DRB approval from planning. This application will not be accepted without a copy of the DRB approval form attached (if applicable). ❑ If this permit is for installation of an exterior hot tub or spa on a new elevated platform or deck over 30" above grade, you must also obtain a building permit. ❑ If this permit is for installation of an exterior hot tub or spa on any existing deck or elevated platform, a structural engineer must review the existing condition and verify that it will support the added concentrated load. Please provide a copy of the structural engineers wet stamped letter or drawing with this application. ❑ If this is a remodel in a multi-family building with a homeowners association, a letter of permission from the association is required. ❑ If this permit is for a commercial space, two (2) sets of stamped drawings are required. Electrical one-line and panel schedules are required if load is added or distribution is altered. I have read an"nder the above. i Sign re Date Signed If you have any questions regarding the above information or have additional questions, please contact the Town of Vail Electrical Inspector at 970-479-2147. The inspector can be reached on Monday thru Friday mornings between the hours of Sam and 9am. You may also leave a voice mail and the inspector will call you back. F:\cdev\FORMS\Permits\Building\electical_permit_11-23-2005.DOC Page 2 of 2 11/23/2005 A part of Lots A, B and C of Amended Map of Sheet 1 of 2 of Vail Village, Second Filing, Eagle County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian; thence along the East line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 7, and referring all bearings contained herein to said line, S00°09'28"W, a distance of 39.20 feet; thence departing said line N79°08'45"W, a distance of 25.44 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot A and the Point of Beginning of the herein described parcel of land; thence along the East line of said Lot A and the West right-of way line of Vail Road (50' wide) S00°09'28"W, a distance of 125.00 feet; thence continue along said line SO0°09'28"W, a distance of 29.15 feet to the Northeast corner of Condominium Map for the Holiday House as recorded in Book 229 at Page 936; thence along the North and West boundaries of said Condominium Map. The following five (5) courses and distances: 1) N73°43'44"W, 156.13 feet; 2) S28°00'55"E, 67.00 feet; 3) S61059'05"W, 18.27 feet; 4) S28°00'55"E, 86.00 feet; 5) S74°12'22"W, 101.49 feet to intersect the North right-of-way line of West Meadow Drive (50' wide); thence along said right-of-way line the following two (2) courses and distances: 1) N67°34'08'TV, 264.42 feet; 2) 58.51 feet along the are of a curve to the left having a radius of .525.00', a central angle of 6°23'09" and a chord which bears N70°45'43"W, 58.48' to the Southwest corner of said Lot C; thence along the West line of said Lot C N10°51 15"E, a distance of 251.25 feet to the Northwest comer of said Lot C; thence along the North line of said Lot C S79°08'45"E, a distance of 300.00 feet to the Northeast comer a said Lot C and the Northwest comer of said Lot A; thence along the North line of said Lot A S79°08'45"E, a distance of 152.65 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 118765 square feet or 2.726 acres of land more or less. Bearings are based on State Plane Coordinates, Colorado Central Zone., {104772.DOC} 11 Date: 3/15/07 To: Charlie Davis Title: Chief Building Official Address: 75 S. Frontage Road, Vail RE: PROJECT: 4 Seasons REVISION INTERNAL REF 3234 PLAN REVIEW: E07-0021 ADDRESS: 1 Vail Road Dear: Charlie, Colorado Inspection Agency has completed a review of the following documents: Plans: 2- Electrical Sheets for temporary power Fees 10 $ 80 $ 11 $5439.50 81 $ Total Permit Fee $5439.50 Plan Review Fee $ Hourly at $60 $ Increase Valuation $ These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Codes as adopted by the Town of Vail. Colorado Inspection Agency finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction and ready for issuance of the revisions. Please see attached conditions of approval. Sincerely, Matthew Royer Building Official Colorado Inspection Agency (970)328-1790 matt. rover(cDcoi nspect.com TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ELECTRICAL PERMIT 12/20/2006 --b 6(, _0~ q Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: 13 VAIL ROAD Parcel No...: 210107101016 Project No OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT LUDVIK ELECTRIC CO 3900 S. TELLER STREET LAKEWOOD COLORADO 80235 License: 167-E CONTRACTOR LUDVIK ELECTRIC CO 3900 S. TELLER STREET LAKEWOOD COLORADO 80235 License: 167-E Desciption: PROPERTY Valuation: Permit E06-0269 Status ISSUED Applied 12/20/2006 Issued . 01/04/2007 Expires . 07/03/2007 12/20/2006 Phone: (303) 781-9601 12/20/2006 Phone: (303) 781-9601 INSTALL 200 AMP TEMPORARY POWER SERVICE ON WEST SIDE OF $6,468.00 Square feet: 0 FEE SUMMARY Electrical > $152.95 Total Calculated Fees--> $155.95 DRB Fee > $0.00 Additional Fees > $0.00 Investigation > $0.00 Total Permit Fee--------> $155.95 Will Call > $3.00 Payments > $155.9 TOTAL FEES--> $155.95 BALANCE DUE--------> $0.00 Approvals: Item: 06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT 12/28/2006 JCHILDS Action: AP Approved service to Job trailer. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN DVANC MY TE P ONE AT 47 -2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. \ TOWN OF VAIL. COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R070000008 Amount: $155.95 01/04/200710:40 AM Payment Method: Check Init: DDG Notation: Ludvik 025889 Permit No: E06-0269 Type: ELECTRICAL PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 13 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: $155.95 This Payment: $155.95 Total ALL Pmts: $155.95 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts EP 00100003111100 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 155.95 it OfFIe-c- e--Py F6(.-OZ&7 3a(0- 0l9(P 'Au'sj a N 't-/ 1F: 2657 12/27/2006 Charlie Davis Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: PROJECT: Four Seasons BUILDING PERMIT #:1306-0196 PLAN REVIEW: E06-0269 REVISION 1 ADDRESS: 1 Vail Road Dear Mr. Davis: Colorado Inspection Agency has completed a review of the following documents: Plans: 1. Civil sheet #1 of 4 2. One line sheet LESK-1 These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the International Codes and Town Code as adopted by the Town of Vail. Colorado Inspection Agency recommends approval of these documents for construction in compliance with adopted codes. Sincerely, Matthew Royer Building Official Colorado Inspection Agency (970)328-1790 (877)428-6412 matt. roVer(a1coinspect.com REVIEWED BY FD EC 2277 COLORADO INSPECTION AGENCY PCVlad>~~oC-2 APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF - 1 TO O WAIL ` 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 LETE OIRNSIGNE~ Q c G3 ~m ProjecC#: l~ V Building-Permit Electric`af Permit _ ~y 970-47149 (Inspections) CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Electrical Contractor: COMPLETE SQ. FOOTAGE FOR AREA OF WORK AND VALUATION OF WORK (Labor & Materials) AMOUNT OF SQ FT IN STRUCTURE: ELECTRICAL VALUATION: $ Contar_t Fao% County dssessorc Offro at 970-329-8640 or visit www_ Pule-rrnunty rnm for Parcel 0 Parcel # Job Name: Y - L rur~i~ J) ] [Job Address: I Legal Description Lot: Block: I FFiling: Subdivision: Owners Name: Address: Phone: Engineer: Address: Phone: Detailed description of work: _Cjy- r~ u A o~- ,r4- '7' - v4 ► &Z '7Z% ice: 2 I c (Zll) v' PF1 G ~ 1 EYL .f" .~L 6L 1."! CL ~v i c l ~:t;..+~t `7 lZG, / U P d "?2 . 2 ~t " Q%tJ lv c-5 i 1 D c cG ~/L c; 'e 2 T Work Class: New Addition ( ) Remodel( ) Repair ( ) Temp Power Other ( ) Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior (k") Both ( L l Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes( ) No Cx5 Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Duplex ( ) Multi-family ( ) Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other (Xf No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: No. of Accommodation Units in this building: Is this permit for a hot tub: Yes No Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes( ) No ) ~ JL56-es_a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes( ) No ( ) ***********************************FOR OFFICE USE ONLY**,**************************xx*****,~ Other Fees: Date Received: 5 DRB Fees: Accep ted B : Planner Sion-off: F:\cdev\FORMS\Permits\Building\electical_permit_11-23-2005.DOC Page 1 of 2 11/23/2005 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF VAIL PROPERTY A part of Lots A, B and C of Amended Map of Sheet 1 of 2 of Vail Village, Second Filing, Eagle County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast comer of Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian; thence along the East line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 7, and referring all bearings contained herein to said line, S00°09'28"W, a distance of 39.20 feet; thence departing said line N79°08'45"W, a distance of 25.44 feet to the Northeast comer of said Lot A and the Point of Beginning of the herein described parcel of land; thence along the East line of said Lot A and the West right-of way line of Vail Road (50' wide) S00°09'28"W, a distance of 125.00 feet; thence continue along said line S00°09'28"W, a distance of 29.15 feet to the Northeast comer of Condominium Map for the Holiday House as recorded in Book 229 at Page 936; thence along the North and West boundaries of said Condominium Map. The following five (5) courses and distances: 1) N73°43'44"W, 156.13 feet; 2) S28°00'55"E, 67.00 feet; 3) S61°59'05"W, 18.27 feet; 4) S28°00'55"E, 86.00 feet; 5) S74° 12'22"W, 101.49 feet to intersect the North right-of-way line of West Meadow Drive (50' wide); thence along said right-of-way line the following two (2) courses and distances: 1) N67°34'08"W, 264.42 feet; 2) 58.51 feet along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 525.00', a central angle of 6°23'09" and a chord which bears N70°45'43"W, 58.48' to the Southwest corner of said Lot C; thence along the West line of said Lot C N10°51' 15"E, a distance of 251.25 feet to the Northwest comer of said Lot C; thence along the North line of said Lot C S79°08'45"E, a distance of 300.00 feet to the Northeast comer a said Lot C and the Northwest comer of said Lot A; thence along the North line of said Lot A S79°08'45"E, a distance of 152.65 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 118765 square feet or 2.726 acres of land more or less. Bearings are based on State Plane Coordinates, Colorado Central Zone. {104772.DOC) A Scott Symcox From: Doug Carley [DCarley@layton-const.com] Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 1 A 1 PM To: Scott Symcox Cc: Mark Reed Subject: RE: Temporary Permit for Four Season's, Vail Attachments: Lagal Description of Vail Property.pdf Scott: Below are the answers to your questions: 1. Property Owners Name and Phone # Vail Development, LLC Doug Hipskind 612-313-0123 2. Parcel# See attached. 3. Job Address 1 Vail Road Vail, CO 81658 4. Legal Description, Lot, Block, Filing See attached Let me know if you need anything else. Doug Carley From: Scott Symcox [mailto:ssymcox@ludvik.com] Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 10:32 AM To: Doug Carley; Mark Reed Subject: Temporary Permit for Four Season's, Vail Gentlemen, Page 1 of 2 We will be submitting for the temporary power permit for Layton's office trailer tomorrow. I need the following information to complete the permit application; it should match to what you've submitted to date. Property Owners Name & Phone Parcel Job Address: Legal Description; Lot; Block; Filing: 12/18/2006 Page 2 of 2 We will need to submit this tomorrow through the Town of Vail; they will turn it over to C.I.A. for review/approval and then issue the permit. Per my conversation with C.I.A., their review will take about a week. Thanks for your assistance, Ludvik Electric Co. Scott Symcox Construction Manager 12/18/2006 3 K E. < p N Z Z r0 r N (n - oT E. a ' n y 2. n Dv 4 y = u s D a 9 D i 10 mNNNNI 91 II II - y 8 x a s % m N s z n p c n a OWO 8 'D YID m~ 8 m SSE % A m A A A ~ J a3 5 N x R D Z d m NtiN o < y a M c a 8$$ $~n =z' o° o o r r o 51f ul it o. i i X F 3-FS > S`~ a a S C _ n C % n o a Z ¢ R; _ Z a 9 ~6 3 i r n Z 3 n o O~ Z E D ~ ~ k > C gi ~i ~ g D di 3 mis z a D >El it ANN m O1 A N o m Ol A N A Z p n c s s ° $ I~ a € "s s f ° 3 3 22 x x x x N A II N O ou (A O O r-l N D N X SO D D °o Zc C D C.+~p ~n~~ (")m G)O ZrFALn - 0 m r n O r d N 0 No D {A 0 zmo> C ~mZ C) 00~ < c -~z~ 7 M ;u N ~ 0- 0 C D Z C / o 41 Z°moc mwcmio y f/ ~n~ -io x~ C~ ~m ~c N X m mr- m I I mr FBI N A O N O II :x or ; i ~d 00 u z > Ln ~ Ngo C, ~d o D -0 D 0 O 0 n ~ r~ ~i D rn r D W Z r OD -i x 1~1 J co = 1^1 r oc) -v co _9 = OnOCD O O Fn ;u ;a mm fTl c~ L7 OD o m M ~17oc) ~c C~ Zm o wx ooozo -u A00OODOD 11 O m m zo m (A ~mG)C m DAN ~m N A~ 1Ly~~~ > m z c) -i m Z n -u r' m ON Z= 0 II ` N ` N D W` ON L4 --4 c O m r O D XN Z aom (n Lzs ~ zF zz c 'm o~ O m~ r 0-3 z <x ~N o z m No om F~I.1 O mmo X D Zmxrn Opzm o n< LJ 1--1 m «Om r zc> >'cl -9mDZ Om n m c V) C-) A Z G7 m 0) m En X m !Tj m D Op -40 r -io; y ~D m O N~ r z °m~c cZiLn ro m mD m z mac' d = o~ n ~I 0z °OC g ~ o z -o (10 rm N m o z O Z Z m c) y -o o 0 A~ cn V' 0-3 D~ xU nZz ZCD 00 = m D 1---1 1 r N Z n I O m m cn c r-1 r m ZmK L> 2 °Ln 2 ZcD 40X np D D - O m Ln n Oz nmL,+ ~z o, cnOZ m o r-rn moo" Zc) i m~z m 05! =1 ~c) > p 0 r z Z> p c G7 Z rn to U D _ O A D D D D = O o co Drz oz m m m m > ~T'1 c C) r w-1 Z c0 1 1 A 1 D F7u),mi Z o z > -Ii O z v m v m X ' D O m Z Z ' m D C~ < A n rn 2O C• w 00 w G, . r ~Itlo FOUR SEASONS co 3900 SOUTH TIM TEMPORARY POWER FOR LAYTO N' S L~ LI~I COLORADO 80235 CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS x LUDVIK ( (303) 303) 781-9801 CWHm ELECTRIC ®~00"AD`~CO' VAIL, COLORADO ~ N O --I Q ry A ~ ~ ~ V ~ A ~ f' ~ J J V J < S ~ D o r 3 ~ 0 H ?l o n ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ D ~ ~ ~ o < _ m 0 II V m 0 D i rtri rm rtri ~ ~ A 0 z f n ~I 11 D ~ O O O O O 2" ~ N N V ~ m g o ~ O a ' N O a g S n m o m TR w N O V N W + ~ ~ T P c o c in n m D n m D m D n m D = ~ o ~ fJ Gl N o A N j ~ 0 0 0 0 0 2 d s g ° n m ~ ~ ~ !?I N a m p o O O N O O ~ T O~ n o ~ N N 'D X X O p{ D z ~ ~ a ~ o 0 0 0 o ~ D A A n ~ 3 D ~ ~ v 3 a O A ~ N II r °y Z m ~i m D .,.W,.,,..,,._ _ / ! / / i ,mrr//ai/aoiaia/aura a/aiaa a a / / / / /aaaaa / H////// d//////////d////dl/!1/N//J/////4//.////////i/////////////////////H////l////b'//H/////rYG/ //1 / / / Ldd//H///// ///.!1////H///1///// / /a / / /iiii/loll/aiaioaiiooiai/iitaiaiiNiiiuioiiaHa////o/o//o//ai/iao/oo/a/ai/aiiiiai/a//i/oioi/Uiaa//ou//,rauaHiuauih'nai////rata//amv a//u/ ////vaui/a/i/a/ / / / u 1N //.tea / /q//// / a/a au// /u HH /n' / / / / Jaaooiinoaaaaavoaaaaaioaoiaa/uaaaaaroiaioaaaaiaaamaaiomaaaaaiaioioaaaa/aiaiaiaiaoaoiaa/aaaiaoaaoaaaoaaiaiaiooa/aa/aaoiaaiaiaaraaiaaiimaao / / / (!t{ll(~(~f(~'/!/,(~l~yr(/~lx,_„ n. f. <3 f"} P°''i'*.nr , ! 3 .:•<say^ a ,v c, .~z•.: 'Yn" .a .i.L,L~.n.~ / " XN grr z ...h .a i % t~~~. f . ~ 9~ / ~ EDGE' L~/ ~ ft?f f.Yp~"V ' r v~~r f;~~~ y f ~ 1`3 l~r ~Y w .t> ~ 3,! ( f ~ 14/'=r. / w. s' / / t / ..r.. / ' % r. vii , . 4 ' / / /r , y✓ Y ..a r......,,„ / . , 1 . , . , ~y~ 1 , ,'l~ f,. ////~G/ ' ' i~ tr'rrr''Tt r r r...,.~..,. t r r / nr / -i / / ~ a , . / , . / , / , 1 . y/, w r , s• f. ' %/'o ~ . i /j~, ~ 1 Fri t`"~~ _ , _ H , / . , / ,J~ I ~l a a.~, / 4 - 'a, • %O/%i%/////f2 ~w n ' / 'J i ' % l'WinvrJi ^ 1. ~ - r J/+ ` f c ~ ! ~ a 4 / r ; / t / 1p~~ f / Y / , . , n. / ~ „ / / F / f/3 ~ r , ' ~ ~utW~ ~p~rpriuv ii nit/r}' fi f - , r_. / P A\ yi ~ ~ " ~ 6 /ioipi4iirbi Wqi/i, UFi/t ^ ~ y ~i/rd~~/~raviayiv//fir ~ ' ' UI/1 ~ O p x J/iii t r ` F 1 /mil/! t r/ / r _ , s , 1 i ;1 ~ f, i ~ 3Z>~p ~ ti n p h~ / / ~r3: ~.i.. ~ tCJJ f r..e.. / / ~ „r y,r:~ j..~ Vii'' 9 ~ =r,... f , / " / Sm. i -f/r//l//%/W r ~ / f •~ll~i~/rlr/l/. ~ r/!/~/lip " ! ~J p ~ /ivW f / ' ' /w i f yirriyyoiiip/li .n , - ' ~f ' Su~ / / , G/i~iii/rp : ' ,....y., I J - . AF",fiRGt .~AVi<.#r;„?d a::. iz;~aA` RC ;r f nrp wn/nn - / ~ ~ i / z ~ , / ,f , f .l.,.f ~ / ~ Yk. Eliau sc i{ f ! / _ + ~ ~pf . i ~ o . ; - , , y ` - , J` ! s.. ~;j f 1 ~ . ,c . f ' . 1i , t S ' j ~ '.f. f l / / ,n' / J/ r ~yi 1 ii i• s o, t~ ~ ./GyiliriWlWi/Llp finii/i4pi ~ r , i " 4 / 1 4 / ' % 9 s . /II . . ~ r 4 / • / , • , - Yip. Y?~df7+4w ~ . ' ~ , / q ~ o / . r -A - !t 4/., ~ r . ,.fly .5 L w^, / r / ~ r.. ~ / . , / / r r:A. . / ti / r ' f ,.f / a.,' d / ) r r ~ . J / X iif 'i HH _ k r ' / x n: , M 7 ~ , / i/ ~ a~ F r r,- ~ e , , ~ ~ ~ ~ „ l 3 l': ' / " / . 4 , S~'~ / ~ v kt~~,y:,~.. ,n~ i 1„4,." 7Waa~piigr /J/~U//~ / ,..1 } y~~,~ ,:~1~~ fry yib' r `il l ~ 1 j . f / ' " ~ 7~t~^~i ~ r~'~3,'r~Sf `3 rya"y o ,e ,~,~.a ~`s~, ~ 1 / , y~ Y- ~ d , tt.'.. + ~if*i lr~ ~OCi ~~~„C°~ ~ ~~3 ",ti ~Y fi A7 / i p ' ~ l ll~~ g~,~ ~i r' ' ' ' I ~W. ~ Y ~y~ ;j~~ / { / ~ x~'i ~ t ' 1e-~f ,;.Kip ! 1 ~ t y / #k ~ v vii' / / ~r4 .~.z ,*~,+F'rc~'. ~ f i~ yir Y{ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ i 6~). i ~ ^iiy:i r.iL~ 1 ~fif-4t 1~{h~js ~A~ i FC':~r~C x r iifi% .4 iii r~1 J~t~s ~ t ' ,G'~t r "M~`'a t 1F'Y~l. ~ ~ 1''. f s ~ ~~;yr^ .,t ~ ~ rJ s~ z y~.Yr ti E~. ~ e't~/~~„ 'f /~Sta4 <Ai'~ f dlj r!' : / , ~ ,Y ~l~~l`,~~~,,~~w~~; f e h ~ / ,I / . r. fi~~, ,~r.- ~~~~%t y~;i inf. r / ,y ?i i 'I / a ~r ?day; J + r. e, z j ~ _ . ;fin„ ? / , / ~ '1. /'~r' , ~ ~p.,,, j r, i ~ ;Y ~ SAL(. , , t # J ff i I / `1 ~ / l / / / " ~ ~ .,1~ , i ~ r ' p fi ! i t  - - - ~,f y GRAPHIC SCALE `r: 30 aD 15 30 60 ( IN PUT } ( A inch = 30 ft I t U!/ l// /!/l /H/ ~ a TOWN OF VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2135 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES SPRINKLER PERMIT Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: FOUR SEASONS Parcel No...: 210107101016 Project No OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT ALL STATE FIRE PROTECTION, 6045 E 76TH #12 COMMERCE CITY CO 80022 License: 370-S CONTRACTOR ALL STATE FIRE PROTECTION, 6045 E 76TH #12 COMMERCE CITY CO 80022 License: 370-S 08/17/2009 Permit F09-0034 Status . . . : ISSUED Applied..: 08/17/2009 Issued . 09/09/2009 Expires. I 08/17/2009 Phone: 303-288-3901 I 08/17/2009 Phone: 303-288-3901 Desciption: INSTALL FIRE SPRINKLER HEADS IN SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR CEILINGS Valuation: $51,000.00 FEE SUMMARY ****************************r******************************* Mechanical $0 .00 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees---> $2, 599.50 Plan Check $432.00 DRB Fee--------------------- > $0.00 Additional Fees-----------> $2,023 .50) Investigation-> $0.00 TOTAL FEES--------------> $2,599.50 Total Permit Fee---------- > $576.00 Will Call-----> $0.00 Payments > $576.00 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0.00 Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 08/28/2009 mcgee Action: AP Limited Approval Approved for installation of pipe in areas where sprinkler work has not started, under the auspices of All State Fire Sprinkler. Permission to start Re-work of existing fire sprinkler pipe subject to identificat plans prior to starting work. Separate Approval is required. Heads and hydraulic review and technical submital forma issues are still to be resolved. CONDITION OF APPROVAL Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 53 Monitored fire sprinkler system required and shall comply with NFPA 13 and VFES Standards. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970-479-2252 FROM 8:00 AM - 5 PM. I / SIGb(ATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R090001163 Amount: $576.00 09/09/200912:59 PM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: LC Notation: CREIDT CARD: RAYMOND S GIBLER Permit No: F09-0034 Type: SPRINKLER PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: FOUR SEASONS Total Fees: $576.00 This Payment: $576.00 Total ALL Pmts: $576.00 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts BP 00100003111100 SPRINKLER PERMIT FEES 144.00 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 432.00 TOWN OF VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81 957 970-479 35 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ALARM PERMIT Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL Parcel No...: 210107101016 Project No OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT TRIPLE C COMMUNICATIONS 13792 COMPARK BLVD. #100 ENGLEWOOD COLORADO 80112 License: 835-S CONTRACTOR TRIPLE C COMMUNICATIONS 13792 COMPARK BLVD. #100 ENGLEWOOD COLORADO 80112 License: 835-S 04/28/2009 Permit A09-0025 Status ISSUED Applied..: 04/28/2009 Issued . 08/17/2009 Expires. 02/13/2010 04/28/2009 Phone: (303) 850-9000 04/28/2009 Phone: (303) 850-9000 Desciption: INSTALL BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS (CAPABLE OF EXPANDING TO INCLUDE CARRIERS) Valuation: $270,000.00 FEE SUMMARY Electrical > $0.00 Total Calculated Fees--> $10, 357. 00 DRB Fee--------- > $0.00 Additional Fees > $0. 00 Investigation > $0.00 Total Permit Fee--------> $10,357.00 Will Call > $0.00 Payments > $10,357.00 TOTAL. FEES--> $10,357.00 BALANCE DUE--------> $0.00 Approvals: Item: 0560 0 FIRE DEPARTMENT 05/2 8/2009 McGee Action: AP 06/11/2009 shahn Action: AP bi directional approved with comments CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQI, ESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL. BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BV TELEPHONE AT 970-479-2252 FROM 8:00 AM - 5 PM. OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R090001025 Amount: $10,357.0008/17/200901:54 PM Payment Method: Check Init: JLE Notation: 2594 TRIPLE C Permit No: A09-0025 Type: ALARM PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL Total Fees: $10,357.00 This Payment: $10,357.00 Total ALL Pmts: $10,357.00 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts BP 00100003111100 FIRE ALARM PERMIT FEES PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 10,125.00 232.00 TOWN OF VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2135 VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES SPRINKLER PERMIT Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: 13 VAIL ROAD Parcel No...: 210107101016 Project No OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT FIRETROL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, 3538 PEORIA STREET, UNIT 506 AURORA COLORADO 80010 License: 764-S CONTRACTOR FIRETROL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, 3538 PEORIA STREET, UNIT 506 AURORA COLORADO 80010 License: 764-S 07/28/2008 Permit F08-0048 Status . . . : ISSUED Applied..: 07/24/2008 Issued . 08/07/2008 Expires. 07/28/2008 Phone: (303) 366-5875 07/28/2008 Phone: (303) 366-5875 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL: TEMPORARY STANDPIPE SYSTEM Valuation: $25,000.00 FEE SUMMARY Mechanical $0.00 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees $2,475.00 Plan Check $350. 00 DRB Fee--------------------- > $0.00 Additional Fees-----------> $0.00 Investigation-> $1,062.50 TOTAL FEES--------------> $2,475.00 Total Permit Fee---------- > $2,475. 00 Will Call-----> $0.00 Payments > $2,475.00 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0.00 Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 07/30/2008 McGee Action: AP Temp Standpipe: 1. Fire Hose Valves shall be installed at each level in each stair. 2. Underground pipe for FDC shall comply with State of Colorado Division of Fire ; and ERWSD requirements. Special inspection is required before backfill. 3. All materials shall meet or exceed minimum operating pressures throughout. 4. Hydrostatic test shall conducted at 300 psi for two hours minimum. CONDITION OF APPROVAL Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: CON0010193 Temp Standpipe: 1. Fire Hose Valves shall be installed at each level in each stair. 2. Underground pipe for FDC shall comply with State of Colorado Division of Fire Safety, NFPA and ERWSD requirements. Special inspection is required before backfill. 3. All materials shall meet or exceed minimum operating pressures throughout. 4. Hydrostatic test shall conducted at 300 psi for two hours minimum. #########rtrt########rtrtrtrt#########rt###########################rt##rt###################rtrtrt#######################rt#rt#rt##################rt#######rt##4# DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE SEVENTY-TWO HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970-479-2252 FROM 8:00 AM - 5 PM. OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R080001339 Amount: $2,475.00 08/07/200804:09 PM Payment Method: Check Init: DDG Notation: Firetrol Protection Systems, INc. 059670 Permit No: F08-0048 Type: SPRINKLER PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 13 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: $2,475.00 This Payment: $2,475.00 Total ALL Pmts: $2,475.00 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code - - Description Current Pmts BP 00100003111100 SPRINKLER PERMIT FEES 1,062.50 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 350.00 PN 00100003153000 INVESTIGATION FEE (FIRE) 1,062.50 APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIGNED Project T Building Permit (p-61 fiOw I .fy Sprinkler Permit X00 N 970-479-2135 (Inspections) 75 S. Frontage Rd. TOWN OF VAIL FIRE SPRINKLER PERMIT APPLICATION Vail, Colorado Fire Sprinkler shop drawings are required at time of permit submittal and 81657 must include the following. Permit application will not be accepted without this information: • A Colorado Registered Engineer's stamp or N.I.C.E.T. Level III (min) stamp. • Equipment cut sheets of materials. • Hydraulic calculations. • A State of Colorado Plan Registration form. • Plans must be submitted by a Registered Fire Protection Contractor. CONTRACTOR INFORNIATION Fire Sprinkler Contractor: Town of Vail Reg. No.: Contact and Phone #'s: FIRETROL PROTECTION 764-5 ALAN BRUCH; 303-366-5875 -11 E-Mail Address: ABRUCH@FIRETROL.NET Contractor Signature: COMPLETE VALUATIONS FOR ALARM PERMIT (Labor & Materials) Fire Sprinkler: $ 25,000.00 71 Contact Eaqle County Assessors Office at 970-32R-scan nr viclt 1AAnnn1 oanL,_nn:,nh. 11-1 F- D-t is Parcel # 210107101016 Job Name: Job Address: FOUR SEASONS VAIL HOTEL 1 VAIL RD., VAIL, CO 80657 Legal Description Lot: Blo ck: Filing: Subdivision: A,B,C 2ND FILING l Owners Name: Address: Phone: BLACK DIAMOND RESORTS 50S,6 TI ST. #1480, 612-313-0123 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 Engineer: Address: Phone: RYBKA 7380 SANDLAKE RD. #500, 407-895-8535 ORLANDO, FL 32819 Detailed Location of work: (i.e., floor, unit bldg. TEMP INSTALL OF STANDPIPE IN STAIRS Detailed description of work: NEW INSTALL OF STANDPIPE SYSTEM Work Class: New ( ) Addition Remodel Repair Retro-fit Other Type of Bldg.: Single-family Two-family Multi-family Commercial Restaurant Other No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: 0 No. of Accommodation Units in this building: 0 Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes No Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes No (E]) .a.,..,..g.n.: .,..;..r-n.i..r.; o.n.n.~.c.,.-r•.,..,..,.~,S,::ryy ...,...w.,.~.i,.,..,::.. : r~ FOR OFFICE USE NLY'' ►~s~ranc;~ \ Other Fees: Date Received: Public Way Permit Fee : Accepted B : Occupancy Group: UU ~1 2 4 2019 8, 'TOWN JFY 'VA - (07/30/2008) Mike McGee F08-0048 Four Seasons Temp Standpipe Page 1 From: Mike McGee To: abruch@firetrol.net; Building-Division Date: 07/30/2008 8:45 AM Subject: F08-0048 Four Seasons Temp Standpipe CC: Fire-Inspectors Approved as noted: Temp Standpipe: 1. Fire Hose Valves shall be installed at each level in each stair. 2. Underground pipe for FDC shall comply with State of Colorado Division of Fire Safety, NFPA and ERWSD requirements. Special inspection is required before backfill. 3. All materials shall meet or exceed minimum operating pressures throughout. 4. Hydrostatic test shall conducted at 300 psi for two hours minimum. TOWN OF VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2135 VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES SPRINKLER PERMIT Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: 13 VAIL ROAD Parcel No...: 210107101016 Project No _~>2_ -6 6 `t (o `tS OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT FIRETROL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, 3538 PEORIA STREET, UNIT 506 AURORA COLORADO 80010 License: 764-S CONTRACTOR FIRETROL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, 3538 PEORIA STREET, UNIT 506 AURORA COLORADO 80010 License: 764-S 05/30/2008 05/30/2008 Phone Permit F08-0032 Status . . . : ISSUED Applied..: 05/30/2008 Issued . 07/10/2008 Expires. (303) 366-5875 05/30/2008 Phone: (303) 366-5875 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL: FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR ALL FLOORS AND CLASS 1 STANDPIPE SYSTEM Valuation: 1,130,467.00 FEE SUMMARY Mechanical $0. 00 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees $48,394.85 Plan Check $350 .0 0 DRB Fee--------------------- > $0.00 Additional Fees-----------> $1, 734.00 Investigation-> $0. 00 TOTAL FEES--------------> $48,394.85 Total Permit Fee---------- > $50, 128. 85 Will Call-----> $0.00 Payments > $50,128.85 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0. 00 Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 06/03/2008 McGee Action: DN 45o Plans fail to meet minimum standards. Standpipe system is not in sufficient detail for review. Pipe materials are not sl standpipes. FDC's are not shown. RJA identified 13 items needing correction and re-submittal. Make corrections pric re-submittal. Supply source data for flow tests. Lite Safety Report requires specific densities and excludes reductions, especiail, room". Plans do not indicate proper densities or areas of coverage. Materials data sheets are not specific as to size or intended location for pipe, etc.. Plan review terminated. Review fee is assessed plus penalty for starting work without permit. 06/27/2008 McGee Action: DN Submittal 6/26/08 does not meet minimum co( requirements. 1. Plans are not stamped. 2. Copies of materials cut sheets do not show specifics. 3. Copies of hydraulic calculations and FPE review letter do not have original sic 4. Plans are not coordinated. Sheets FP 59 and FP 69 show different numbers for s1 the same stair. 5. Overal floor plans at 1/16 scale are unreadable. 6. Notes on Stairs on 1/8 scale plans are unreadable. 7. Plans do not show fire hose valves on Level 1. 8. Plans are cluttered with fire sprinkler pipe that is not part of the review. Nc sprinkler notes indicate the issue of area reductions has not been addressed. 200' NFPA 13 has not been adopted by State of Colorado or Town of Vail. Re-submittal is required. 07/02/2008 McGee Action: PA Approval granted for standpipe, FDC's and I Levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 only. Cond: 12 CONDITION OF APPROVAL (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE SEVENTY-TWO HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970-479-2252 FROM 8:00 AM - 5 PM. i~ SIGt"rURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R080001128 Amount: $50,128.8507/10/200801:08 PM Payment Method: Check Init: DDG Notation: Firetrol 058538 Permit No: F08-0032 Type: SPRINKLER PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 13 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: $50,128.85 This Payment: $50,128.85 Total ALL Pmts: $50,128.85 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts BP 00100003111100 SPRINKLER PERMIT FEES 49,778.85 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 350.00 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT MWOFYAlL Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970-479-2139 f. 970.479.2452 inspections. 970.479.2149 MECHANICAL PERMIT ACOM Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: 13 VAIL ROAD Parcel No...: 210107101016 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 07/24/2008 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT HOME & HEARTH OUTFITTERS 730 S. JASON ST. #28 DENVER COLORADO 80223 License: 368-M CONTRACTOR HOME & HEARTH OUTFITTERS 730 S. JASON ST. #28 DENVER COLORADO 80223 License: 368-M 07/24/2008 Phone: (303) 327-4654 07/24/2008 Phone: (303) 327-4654 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL: INSTALL 187 DIRECT VENT FIREPLACES AND 2 MASONRY FIREPLACES WITH GAS LOGS Valuation: $741,728.84 Status ISSUED Applied..: 07/24/2008 Issued . 12/22/2008 Expires . 06/20/2009 *********++.+###**#********+*++++###***#********++++#+++#*****************+++*+#FEE SUMMARY****++++++++**************+*+++++####+*###********************+#++++++##*+###**#***** Mechanical Permit Fee---> $14,840.00 Will Call > $4.00 Total Calculated Fees $18,554.00 Plan Check > $3,710.00 Use Tax Fee------ > $0.00 Additional Fees-----------> $0.00 Investigation-----------------> $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEE---> $18,554.00 Total Calculated Fees--> $18,554.00 Payments-----------------> $18,554.00 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0.00 APPROVALS Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/06/2008 derekplace Action: CR Correction letter sent, main fireplace flue too long and too many offsets 12/19/2008 jplano Action: AP No Charge from SAFEbuilt CONDITION OF APPROVAL Cond:12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond:22 (BLDG.): COMBUSTION AIR IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 7 OF THE 2003 IMC AND SECTION 304 OF THE 2003 IFGC AS MODIFIED BY TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 23 (BLDG.): BOIILER INSTALLATION MUST CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND CHAPTER 10 OF THE 2003 IMC. Cond: 25 (BLDG.): GAS APPLIANCES SHALL BE VENTED ACCORDING TO CHAPTER 5 OF THE 2003 IFGC. Cond: 29 (BLDG.): ACCESS TO MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 3 OF THE 2003 IMC AND CHAPTER 3 OF THE 2003 IFGC. Cond: 31 (BLDG.): BOILERS SHALL BE MOUNTED ON FLOORS OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE CONST. UNLESS LISTED FOR MOUNTING ON COMBUSTIBLE FLOORING. Cond: 32 (BLDG.): PERMIT,PLANS AND CODE ANALYSIS MUST BE POSTED IN MECHANICAL ROOM PRIOR TO AN INSPECTION REQUEST. Cond: 30 (BLDG.): BOILER ROOMS SHALL BE EQUIPPPED WITH A FLOOR DRAIN OR OTHER APPROVED ALL TIMES Permit M08-0183 Project PRJ03-0468 mechcanical_permit_041908 MEANS FOR DISPOSING OF LIQUID WASTE PER SECTION 1004.6. **t#*#fifi#*******fifi*#*R***Y*fi#**fi**R***fi##fifi*#**t********fifi*fifi*fifi#*fi#R*R#t****#**fifiYfi*fifi###fit***R*********fifi*###**fi******Y*****YtYfi#*fi********R#R****fi**fi***fi*#t*#*#Rfi*#*R********Y***YY#fi DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:0( AM - 4 PM. Signature of Owng; or Contractor Print Name `07 -,Z2 'd & Date mechcan ical_permit_041908 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R080002399 Amount: $18,554.0012/22/200803:12 PM Payment Method: Check Init: SAB Notation: 58821-home & hearth Permit No: M08-0183 Type: MECHANICAL PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 13 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: $18,554.00 This Payment: $18,554.00 Total ALL Pmts: $18,554.00 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts MP 00100003111100 MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES 14,840.00 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 3,710.00 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 4.00 APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIGNED TOV Project ~R-3o o (v<6 Building Permit t 0o- GI A6 Mechanical Permit M0!;6 -01 t-3 TOWN OVIL 970-479-2149 (Inspections) 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 TOWN OF VAIL MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION Permit will not be accepted without the following: Provide Mechanical Room Layout drawn to scale to include: ❑ Mechanical Room Dimensions ❑ Combustion Air Duct Size and Location ❑ Flue, Vent and Gas Line Size and Location ❑ Heat Loss Calcs. ❑ Equipment Cut/Spec Sheets 7 _19 CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Mechanical Contractor:, Town of Vail Reg. No.: Contact Person and Phone #'s: e E- MailAddress:( Fax#: X03--7- Contractor Signature: COMP) CTF VAI I1ATTnN FnR MFCMANICAL PERMIT (Labor & Materials MECHANICAL: $ 21 rJ4 r Contact Eagle County Assessors Office at 970-328-8640 or visit www. ea /e-coup . com for Parcel # Parcel # 7-1 01 p 1011) 1 (0 * Z J61 0-7010 1q Job Name:1~ se 3 l~ LLjel ] v / Fob Address: l VCA _~d Legal Description Lot~ Block: Filing: V(~,') Vr 11 ir Z1 Subdivision: 1 Owners Name: ( foj,7 n Address: 20 h ne: Engineer: Address: Phe'h e: Detailed description of w rk: 7 V _P ! C&:S <"Z 1)a " r k're ? 1 &2 16 Work Class: New Addition ( ) Alteration ( ) Repair ( ) Other ( ) Boiler Location: Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Other ( ) Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes( ) No( ) Type of Bldg: Single-family( ) Duplex( ) Multi-family( ) lL Restaurant( ) Other ( ) No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: - 11 No. of Accommodation Units in this building: No /Type of Fireplaces Existin : Gas Appliances Gas Los Wood Pellet Wood Burning No/Type of Fireplaces Proposed: Gas Appliances (1$"7 Gas Logs (1) Wood/Pellet ( ) Wood Burning (NOT ALLOWED) Is this a conversion from a wood burning fireplace to an EPA Phase II device? No( Other Fees: Date Received : Accepted By: SAFEbuiftinc. (701 ORADO Building Department Services December 19, 2008 Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Description: Fireplaces RE: PROJECT: 4 Seasons PERMIT NUMBER: M08-0183 REVISION NUMBER: n/a INTERNAL REF 8496 ADDRESS: 1 Vail Road Dear Mr. Haeberle: SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Building Code as adopted by the Town of Vail. SAFEbuilt Colorado finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction. The installation instructions for each fireplace is to be supplied from the contractor at the time of the inspection. The lobby fireplace will require a power vent based on the total length and number of elbows. Plans: Description: Fireplace Instructions and spreadsheets indicating locations Plan review fee: No Charge from SAFEbuilt, fee paid with original contract No additional square footage- No added valuation Sincere) John Plano Plans Examiner SAFEbuilt Colorado john. lp ano &SAFEbuilt.com Page 1 of 1 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office v' P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\tov M08-0183 ir8496FAL.doc SAFEbuiltlllC. C:01 ORADO Building Department Services December 19, 2008 Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Description: Fireplaces RE: PROJECT: 4 Seasons PERMIT NUMBER: M08-0183 REVISION NUMBER: n/a INTERNAL REF 8496 ADDRESS: 1 Vail Road Dear Mr. Haeberle: OFFICE COPY rob-a83 12 eMc APPROVED Subiect to Inspection and Com liance to all relevant Adopted Building a 111 al Codes. Changes in Plans I IJ ved. Date rz-r 1-~ By Code- ZAMIS SAFEbuilt Colorado SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Building Code as adopted by the Town of Vail. SAFEbuilt Colorado finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction. The installation instructions for each fireplace is to be supplied from the contractor at the time of the inspection. The lobby fireplace will require a power vent based on the total length and number of elbows. Plans: Description: Fireplace Instructions and spreadsheets indicating locations Sincere , John Plano Plans Examiner SAFEbuilt Colorado john.plano(a,,SAFEbuilt.COm opejoloC i1!ng3:1VS 906Z 6 T 330 A9 43M3IA3H Page 1 of 1 SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 v' Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Season s\tov M08-0183 ir8496FAL.doc Four Seasons- Fireplaces Sale Number 42" T&C 36" T&C 30" T&C Wood Flue 27 6 Co-ed Lou 8702500 1 28 9 Wet Mass 820260 1 29 0 Wet Mass 872980 1 351 Private Dining 1 507 Lobby Lounge 1 508 Library - Pool Pavilion 3005 EM-1 3006 EM-1 3007 EM-1 3008 EM-1 3009 EM-1 3010 EM-1 3011 EM-1 3012 EM-1 3013 EM-1 3014 EM-1 3015 EM-1 3016 EM-1 3101 RC-2A 870590 1 3102 RC-36 870600 1 3103 RC-3A-HC 870630 1 3206 K-1 870330 1 3208 K-1 870310 1 3211 K1-RS 870370 1 3212 1K-1 870380 1 1 3213 QQ-1 870490 1 3214 QQ-1C 870500 1 3215 K-1A 870510 1 3216 K-1A 870520 1 3218 QQ1-RS 870530 1 3220 ES-1 870540 1 3222 ES-1A 870560 1 3224 QQ-1A 870570 1 3228 ES-2A 870580 1 Four Seasons- Fireplaces Sale Number 42" T&C 36" T&C 30" T&C Wood Flue REVIEWED BY LDEC 1 9 2008 SAFEbuilt Colorado 400 4 EM-1 400 5 EM-1 400 6 EM-1 400 7 EM-1 4008 EM-1 4009 EM-1 4010 EM-1 4011 EM-1 4012 EM-1 4013 EM-1 4014 EM-1 4015 EM-1 4016 EM-1 4101 RC-2A 870660 1 4102 RC-36 870670 1 4103 RC-3A1 870680 1 4201 K-1 870690 1 4202 K-1 870700 1 4203 K-1 870710 1 4204 K1-H1 870760 1 4205 K-1 870770 1 4206 K-1 870780 1 4207 K-1 870800 1 4208 K-1 870810 1 4211 QQ1-RS 870820 1 4212 1K-1 870830 1 1 4213 K-1A 870850 1 4214 QQ-1C 870860 1 4215 K-1A 870870 1 4216 K-1A 870880 1 4218 QQ-1 870890 1 4220 ES-1 870900 1 4222 ES-1A 870910 1 4224 QQ-1A 870920 1 4228 ES-2A 870930 1 Four Seasons- Fireplaces Sale Number 42" T&C 36" T&C 30" T&C Wood Flue 5101 RC-2A 870940 1 5102 RC-3B 870950 1 5103 RC-3A1 870960 1 REVIEWED BY DEC 19 2008 SAFEbuilt Colorado 5104 RC-4A1 870970 5201 K-1 870980 1 5203 K-1 870990 1 5204 K1-H1 871000 1 5205 K-1 871010 1 5206 K-1 871030 1 5207 K-1 871040 1 5208 K-1 871050 1 5211 QQ-113 871060 1 5212 1K-1 871070 1 1 5213 K-1A 871080 1 5214 QQ-1C 871090 1 5215 K-1A 871100 1 5216 K-1A 871110 1 5218 QQ-1 871130 1 5220 ES-1 871150 1 5222 ES-1A 871160 1 5224 QQ-1A 871170 1 5226 K-3 871190 1 5302 K-11D 871210 1 5304 K-1 871220 1 5306 K-1 871230 1 5308 QQ-11D 871250 1 5310 K-1F 871260 1 5312 K-1C 871270 1 5314 K-1 871280 1 5318 ES-HC 871290 1 Four Seasons- Fireplaces Sale Number 42" T&C 36" T&C 30" T&C Wood Flue 6101 RC-2A 871300 1 6102 RC-3132 1 6103 RC-3A2 1 6104 RC-4A2 0 6201 K-1 871520 1 6202 K-1 871530 1 6203 K-1 871540 1 6204 K1-H1 871550 1 6205 K-1 871560 1 6206 K-1 871580 1 62071 K-1 871590 1 6211 QQ-113 871600 1 REVIEWED BY DEC T 9 2008 SAFEbuilt Colorado 6212 2KK-HC 871610 1 1 6213 K-1A 871620 1 6214 K-1 ? 871630 1 6215 K-1A 871340 1 6216 K-1A 871350 1 6218 QQ-1 871360 1 6220 ES-16 871370 1 6222 ES-16 871380 1 6224 1K-2 871390 1 1 6302 K-1D 871410 1 6304 K-1 871420 1 6306 K-1 871430 1 6308 QQ-1 871440 1 6310 K-1F 871450 1 6312 K-1C 871460 1 6313 K-2 871470 1 6314 K-1 871480 1 6318 ES-2 871490 1 Four Seasons- Fireplaces Sale Number 42" T&C 36'' T&C 30" T&C Wood Flue 7101 RC-2B 1 7104 RC-2B 1 7105 RC-4C1 1 7106 RC-4B1 1 7107 C-1 1 1 7201 K-1 1 7202 K-1 1 7203 K-1 1 7204 K1-H1 1 7205 K-1 1 7206 K-1 1 7207 K-1 1 7208 K-1 1 7211 QQ-1B 1 7212 1K-1 1 1 7214 QQ-1C 7218 2KQQ-1 1 2 7302 K-1D 1 7304 K-1 1 7306 K-1 1 7308 QQ-1 1 REVIEWED BY DEC 1 9 2008 SAFEbuilt~Colorado 7310 K-1 F 1 7312 K-1C 1 7313 K-2A 1 7314 K-1 1 7315 ES-3 1 7318 ES-2 1 7401 C-2 1 1 7402 C-3 1 1 7501 EM-4HC 7502 EM-3 7503 EM-3 Four Seasons- Fireplaces 42" T&C 36" T&C 30" T&C Wood Flue 8101 RC-26 1 8104 RC-26 1 8105 RC-4C2 0 8106 RC-462 0 8107 C-4 1 1 8111 C-5 1 1 8112 C-6 1 1 8201 K-1 1 8202 K-1 1 8204 K1-H1 1 8205 1K-HC 1 1 8206 K-1 1 8207 K-1 1 8208 K-1 1 8211 QQ-1E 1 8212 1K-1 1 1 8214 K-1 ? 1 8302 K1 ? 1 8304 K1 ? 1 8307 C-7 1 1 8308 PR-HC 1 1 8316 K-4 9001 C-8 1 1 9002 C-9 1 1 9011 C-10 1 1 9012. C-11 1 1 REVIEWED BY DEC 19 2008 SAFEbuilt Colorado 9013 C-12 1 2 1001 C-13 1 1002 C-14 1 1 1011 C-15 1 1 1012 C-16 1 1 Total 3 47 137 2 REVIEWED BY DEC 19 2008 SAFEbuilt Colorado 3932001 03.07 Product Information EXHAUSTO Chimney Fan RS 009=016 Use The EXHAUSTO RS Fan is an exhaust fan used to maintain proper draft in a chimney or stack system. The RS Fan is suitiable for use with both gas and solid-fuel burning appliances. Typical uses include venting of fireplaces, BBQ's, pizza ovens and wood stoves. Description The RS Fan should be installed at the termination point of the chimney or stack section. It is typically mounted in the vertical position but may be side-wall vented as well. The fan assures a negative pressure is maintained in the entire chimney or stack system. The fan discharges horizontally (vertically, if side-wall vented) at a high velocity. The fan housing is hinged and the top can be opened for easy service and access to stack. For use with gas, wood, coal, pellets, oil and other types of fuel. Material Housing is 3/16" thick cast aluminum. Finished with one coat of grey hammerpaint for added corrosion resistance. Axial vanes are stainless steel, dynamically and statically balanced to assure low noise level and vibration-free operation. Motor Split capacitor, totally enclosed. Class H insulated, IP54 Protection Class. Sealed ball bearings. Variable Speed. Thermal overload protection. Standard Equipment 2"x4" or 4"x4" Junction Box with Cover and Conduit Fiber Mat and Mounting Brackets Bird Screen 5 Amp Fan Speed Control Specifications are subject to change without notice. Optional Equipment EBC 10 Fan Control EBC 11 Fan & Damper Control EFC 211 Fan Control EW 40 Wireless Control Proven Draft Switch Listings ETL Listed to: UL378, Standard for Draft Equipment CSA-CAN3-8255-M81, Standard for Mechanical Flue Gas Exhausters Approvals CE Compliant The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Warranty 2-year factory warranty on entire fan. 10-year warranty against corro iorfj Manufactured at IS09001 EX HAU STO VENTING DESIGN SOLUTIONS EKpav=~ 3932001 03.07 Specifications Product Information Model RS 009 RS 012 RS 014 RS 016 Discharge Horizontal Fan Type Axial Vane Motor Type Totally enclosed, Variable speed, Class H Voltage VAC 1x120 RPM 1600 CFM 0.0 Ps 1950 Amperage Amps 3.9 Motor Output HP W 1/3 kW 0.25 Weight Ibs 37 61 kg 13 17 21 28 Dimensions A in 10.0 11.0 13.2 16.0 MM 250 275 330 450 B x B in 12.0 14.6 16.8 19.2 MM 300 365 420 480 C in 11.4 14.0 15.8 18.0 MM 285 350 395 450 D in 3.0 3.4 4.0 4.0 MM 75 85 100 100 E in 8.0 11.0 12.0 14.0 MM 203 275 300 350 Temperature Interm. 575°F/300°C Rating Cont. 482°F/250°C Capacity Ps (inW.C.) 1.0 r---r- 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 Volume (cfm) BY 7~~ °47 9 2008 SAFEbuilt Colorado EXHAUSTO Inc. 1200 Northmeadow Pkwy. Suite 180 Roswell, GA 30076 P: 770.587.3238 F: 770.587.4731 EX STO T: 800.255.2923 info@exhausto corn VENTING DESIGN SOLUTIONS e~c«.us,o us.exhausto com Sound Data 1 Junction Box 2 Conduit/cord 3 Motor 4 Motor Housing 5 Cooling Plates 6 Bird Screen 7 Base Plate 8 Locking Nut 9 Inlet 10 Axial Vane 11 Hinges 12 Capacitor (inside junction box) Model Lw dB (measured in accordance with ISO 3744) Lp 1251-HZ 250Hz 5001-1z 10001-1z 20001-1z 40001-1z 80001-1z dB(A) RS 009 54 50 47 43 38 31 25 21 RS 012 64 60 55 52 48 42 34 30 RS 014 75 69 65 62 57 5 RS 016 81 76 72 69 64 I--B J NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES TDWWFVen Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970-479-2139 If. 970.479.2452 inspections. 970.479.2149 MECHANICAL PERMIT ACOM Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL Parcel No...: 210107101016 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 09/30/2008 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CONTRACTOR FALCON PLUMBING & HEATING 07/29/2009 Phone: 970-434-0556 3187 MESA AVE GRAND JUNCTION CO 81504 License: 426-M APPLICANT K K MECHANICAL INC 09/3012008 Phone: (801) 392-3240 1764 W 2900 S OGDEN UTAH 84401 License: 325-M Desclptlon: NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING: COMPLETE MECHANICAL/HVAC Valuation: 6,128,168.00 Permit M08-0248 Project PRJ03-0468 Status ISSUED Applied 09/3012008 Issued. 07/2912009 Expires. 03/30/2009 .4N.N.}.NN...4NN.ltfN4N ...NNffNf.NA.... A.....NN.\................ FEE SUMMARY .####f#N.f..N.f114NAN1fNNfNlf4t;!#ftltN.... ....N#4}#ANN##A441N#....... Mechanical Permit Fee---> 122,580.00 Will Call----- $4.00 Total Calculated Fees 153,229.00 Plan Check--------> $30,645.00 Use Tax Fee----> $0.00 Additional Fees > $0.00 Investigation $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEE---> 153,229.00 Total Calculated Fees--> 153,229.00 Payments > 153,229.00 BALANCE DUE--------> $0.00 #1f }fA........• N................. NR.;ff4.N4. A}4t4. N4##NN4f}4A A4NN4Nf f}f if 4N}NN414#................ tN.N4.NtNN4NN 4NNAi4lN}\AA lff ANIfA4AAA\fN#Nf1N;44}N1444\tt APPROVALS Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 09/30/2008 JLE Action: AP 4A -.....f..... fif4.Ntf4k44NN.HOA.4..4NANAAAl.4}A}AI}4}♦AA}k4A}A#AAA.Af##NN.N#414NN4f44....AN NlN44NAfA4Aff\.fltl NAA41N##f44#}f#ff!♦}MANN.N.N.N.t\f14#NNtf4N CONDITION OF APPROVAL Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 22 (BLDG.): COMBUSTION AIR IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 7 OF THE 2003 IMC AND SECTION 304 OF THE 2003 IFGC AS MODIFIED BY TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 23 (BLDG.): BOIILER INSTALLATION MUST CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND CHAPTER 10 OF THE 2003 IMC. Cond: 25 (BLDG.): GAS APPLIANCES SHALL BE VENTED ACCORDING TO CHAPTER 5 OF THE 20031FGC. Cond: 29 (BLDG.): ACCESS TO MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 3 OF THE 2003 IMC AND CHAPTER 3 OF THE 2003 IFGC.. Cond: 31 (BLDG.): BOILERS SHALL BE MOUNTED ON FLOORS OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE CONST. UNLESS LISTED FOR MOUNTING ON COMBUSTIBLE FLOORING. Cond: 32 (BLDG.): PERMIT,PLANS AND CODE ANALYSIS MUST BE POSTED IN MECHANICAL ROOM PRIOR TO AN INSPECTION REQUEST. Cond: 30 (BLDG.): BOILER ROOMS SHALL BE EQUIPPPED WITH A FLOOR DRAIN OR OTHER APPROVED MEANS FOR DISPOSING OF LIQUID WASTE PER SECTION 1004.6. -....N.N1A4A 4.N4A4..A4.41HNNf..1.t......... ...lft ..............f!♦4.ft!ltlt#tof.ls4t+L.1.1a++++aa+ta+++atth#t+ft+f.:t++++ttt#t ffttt tkt4t#lt++t ttttt#ll+t++tlt tl i........... 4 DECLARATIONS m echcanical-perm it_041908 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the Information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subd Ision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. - FOR JNSP CTJON 61{ALIJ BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 r~ Le e REQUESTS • 4 PM. / ~ / / Print Name or D7~3Df ~f I Date mechcan ical_permit_041908 RAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LLC 86 Chambers Street, Suite 704 Telephone: 347-861-4433 New York, New York 10007 Facsimile: 1-800-308-5947 Mr. Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: Mechanical Permit M08-248 Four Seasons Vail, CO JUL 2 2 2009 TOWN OF VAIL June 18, 2009 Dear Martin, Please be advised that as of July 8, 2009, the mechanical contracting services for the referenced project provided by KK Mechanical have been terminated. Falcon Plumbing and Heating has been contracted to continue forward with the project. In order to prevent any unnecessary interruption to construction activities, we hereby request that the referenced construction permit be transferred from KK Mechanical to Falcon Plumbing and Heating as of July 8, 2009. Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated, If you have any questions on the above, please feel free to contact me at mrossiiyralcompanies.com or 347-861- 4433. Very Truly Yours Michael M. Rossi, PE, LEED AP Authorized Project Representative cc: David Proctor Doug Thompson N0 17E: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSI TE AT MWNO VVAII ' Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970-479-2139 f. 970.479.2452 inspections. 970.479.2149 MECHANICAL PERMIT ACOM Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location.....: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL Parcel No...: 210107101016 OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT K K MECHANICAL INC 1764 W 2900 S OGDEN UTAH 84401 License: 325-M CONTRACTOR K K MECHANICAL INC 1764 W 2900 S OGDEN UTAH 84401 License: 325-M 09/30/2008 09/30/2008 Phone: (801) 392-3240 09/30/2008 Phone: (801) 392-3240 Desciption: NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING: COMPLETE MECHANICAL/HVAC Valuation: 6,128,168.00 ALL TIMES Permit M08-0248 -kG - CA-~k(e Project Status Applied Issued . . . Expires . PRJ03-0468 ISSUED 09/30/2008 10101/2008 03/30/2009 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++`FEE SUMMARY++++++++++.++++++ Mechanical Permit Fee---> 122,580.00 Will Call > $4.00 Total Calculated Fees 153,229.00 Plan Check > $30,645.00 Use Tax Fee------ > $0.00 Additional Fees-----------> $0.00. Investigation-----------------> $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEE---> 153,229.00 Total Calculated Fees--> 153,229.00 Payments-----------------> 153,229.00 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0.00 + « + + + « « « « « « + + « + + « « + + + + « « + « + « « + + + « « « + + « + + « + + « « « « « « + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + « + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + « « + « + « « « + « « « « + « + + + + « + + + + + « + « + « « + + « + + + « « + + « « + « + + + APPROVALS Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 09/30/2008 JLE Action: AP + + + « + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + « + + + + + + + « + « « + + + + + + + « + + + « « + + + « « + « + + + « + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + « + + + + « + + + + + + + + + + + + + « + + + + + + « + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + « + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + CONDITION OF APPROVAL Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 22 (BLDG.): COMBUSTION AIR IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 7 OF THE 2003 IMC AND SECTION 304 OF THE 2003 IFGC AS MODIFIED BY TOWN OF VAIL. Cond: 23 (BLDG.): BOIILER INSTALLATION MUST CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND CHAPTER 10 OF THE 2003 IMC. Cond: 25 (BLDG.): GAS APPLIANCES SHALL BE VENTED ACCORDING TO CHAPTER 5 OF THE 2003 IFGC. Cond: 29 (BLDG.): ACCESS TO MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 3 OF THE 2003 IMC AND CHAPTER 3 OF THE 2003 IFGC.. Cond: 31 (BLDG.): BOILERS SHALL BE MOUNTED ON FLOORS OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE CONST. UNLESS LISTED FOR MOUNTING ON COMBUSTIBLE FLOORING. Cond: 32 (BLDG.): PERMIT,PLANS AND CODE ANALYSIS MUST BE POSTED IN MECHANICAL ROOM PRIOR TO AN INSPECTION REQUEST. Cond: 30 (BLDG.): BOILER ROOMS SHALL BE EQUIPPPED WITH A FLOOR DRAIN OR OTHER APPROVED MEANS FOR DISPOSING OF LIQUID WASTE PER SECTION 1004.6. DECLARATIONS mechcan ical_perm it_041908 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:0( AM -4 PM. Signature of Owner or Contractor me, r lC-- KA TLe-C'. Print Name /0 x-08 Date mechcan ical_perm it_041908 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R080001814 Amount: $137,029.00 10/01/200802:01 PM Payment Method: Check Init: JLE Notation: 334843 LAYTON Permit No: M08-0248 Type: MECHANICAL PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL Total Fees: 153,229.00 This Payment: $137,029.00 Total ALL Pmts: 153,229.00 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts MP 00100003111100 MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES 122,580.00 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 14,445.00 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 4.00 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R080001813 Amount: $16,200.0010/01/200802:00 PM Payment Method: Check Init: JLE Notation: 334844 LAYTON Permit No: M08-0248 Type: MECHANICAL PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL Total Fees: 153,229.00 This Payment: $16,200.00 Total ALL Pmts: $16,200.00 Balance: 137,029.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 16,200.00 Development Review Coordine 75 South Frontage Rt Mechanical Room Lavout drawn to scale to include: _ Mechanical Room Dimensions _ Combustion Air Duct Size and Location Flue, Vent and Gas Line Size and Location _ Heat Loss Calculations Equipment Cut / Spec Sheets Project Address Contractor Information Company: /M Yc k a a i c o Company Address:/ -7 69'Y~J2_clb S, ~7~ City: State: C/7- zip: ,_S7-T~~ Contact Name: k 104 A' -AA-1 Contact PF(&- L' 3q2- 3aY0 ell:/$~ ~ ~ SU'~fiD3 E-Mail: cN< ~A~ t-- !L'~Fff fRhP~ G4/. /VI~~_ Town of i tractpf~t istr yc~ Contrigor Signature (required) Property Information Parcel 0 7Z Oil;, Z1 2/4167lyla/ f' Legal Description: Lot # Subdivision: IVA Blk # Project P 2 -S-0 3 - Y Building Permit* r7 06 -rr0 ( ? 6 Mechanical Permit ~ V ~ -o ;LH Detailed Description of Work: IJVA~ I~~'!~acplo~t"! rN!5 zl it (Use additional sheet if necessary) Complete Valuation for Mechanical Permit: Mechanical $ &I 24F)/ l(4'-0 Work Class: New (Addition ( ) Remodel ( ) Repair ( ) Other ( ) Boiler Location: Interior ( Exterior ( ) Other ( ) No/Type Existing Fireplaces: Gas Appliances( ) Gas Logs ( ) Wood/Pellet ( ) Job Name: J/ u 1 I 6 J r SFpSOh f Owner Name:, ( (~c~~~~o~QM ra -r- L LL Mailing Address: SC S_ (For Parcel # Contact Eagle County assessors Office at 970-328-8640 or visit www.eaglecounty.us/patie) ~v1nFc C (iS 1~'I~ 477-Y C Architect Designer Engineer ( ) Name: Phone: Fax: E-Mail: No/Type Proposed Fireplaces: Gas Appliances(V) Gas Logs (vl) Wood/Pellet ( ) Building Type: Single-Family ( ) Two-Family ( ) Multi-Family ( ) Commercial (v< Townhome ( ) Other ( ) Date Rece eD ~~L '22qG0 [yTOWN4FVAIL TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES PLUMBING PERMIT Permit P07-0188 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Status ISSUED Location.....: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL Applied..: 10/31/2007 Parcel No...: 210107101016 Issued . 03/05/2008 Legal Description: > (Q Expires. 09/01/2008 Project No OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT K K MECHANICAL INC. 1764 W. 2900 S OGDEN UTAH 84401 License: 338-P CONTRACTOR K K MECHANICAL INC. 1764 W. 2900 S OGDEN UTAH 84401 License: 338-P 10/31/2007 10/31/2007 Phone: (801) 392-3240 10/31/2007 Phone: (801) 392-3240 Desciption: FOUR SEASONS-INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY GAS SYSTEM. Valuation: $35,406.00 Fireplace Information: Restricted: # of Gas Appliances: # of Gas Logs: 9? # of Wood Pallet: FEE SUMMARY Plumbing $540.00 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees $679.00 Plan Check $135. 00 TOTAL FEES--------------> $679.00 Additional Fees-----------> $0. 00 Investigation-> $0.00 Total Permit Fee---------- > $679.00 Will Call-----> $4.00 Payments > $679.00 BALANCE DUE > $0. 00 Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 11/29/2007 jpiano Action: DN NEED A SUBMITTAL THAT MATCHES HAT THE FIRE REVIEWED 12/20/2007 jpiano Action: AP Temporary gas permit approved, no charge t: Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITION OF APPROVAL Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. DECLARATIONS hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVA-~JCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R080000245 Amount: $679.00 03/05/200801:09 PM Payment Method: Check Init: DDG Notation: Layton 326691 Permit No: P07-0188 Type: PLUMBING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: FOUR SEASONS HOTEL Total Fees: $679.00 This Payment: $679.00 Total ALL Pmts: $679.00 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts - PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 135.00 PP 00100003111100 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES 540.00 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 4.00 SAFbuhinc. COL. 0 R ADO Building Department Services December 20, 2007 Charlie Davis Chief Building Official, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: PROJECT: 4 Seasons PERMIT NUMBER: P07-0188 REVISION NUMBER: n/a INTERNAL REF 5980 ADDRESS: 1 Vail Road Dear Mr. Davis: SAFEbuilt Colorado has reviewed the documents for conformance to the International Codes as adopted by the Town of Vail. SAFEbuilt Colorado finds the documents submitted to be complete for temporary gas service. Plans: Site plans, Equipment cut sheets No additional valuation, no charge Sincerel John Plano Plans Examiner/Senior Inspector john.plano(Dsafebuilt.com SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (970)328-1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428-6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328-1791 ✓V:\Plan Review\Vail\4 Seasons\B06-0196_tempgas_FAL.doc TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES PLUMBING PERMIT Permit P07-0095 Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Status . ISSUED Location.....: 13 VAIL ROAD Applied 07/12/2007 Parcel No...: 210107101016 Issued . 08/09/2007 Legal Description: t T ~ -6 (C'is Expires . 02/05/2008 ' Project No : OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC 07/12/2007 50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 APPLICANT K K MECHANICAL INC. 07/12/2007 Phone: (801) 392-3240 1764 W. 2900 S OGDEN UTAH 84401 License: 338-P CONTRACTOR K K MECHANICAL INC. 07/12/2007 Phone: (801) 392-3240 1764 W. 2900 S OGDEN UTAH 84401 License: 338-P Desciption: COMPLETE PLUMBING INCLUDED ASSOCIATED FIXTURES Valuation: 9,523,370.00 Fireplace Information: Restricted: # of Gas Appliances: # of Gas Logs: # of Wood Pallet: *****************************+*********s************►**s************* FEE SUMMARY *************s******************************************ssss Plumbing 142, 860.00 Restuarant Plan Review--> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees 178, 578.00 Plan Check $35, 715.00 TOTAL FEES--------------> 178, 578.00 Additional Fees-----------> $0 .00 Investigation-> $0.00 Total Permit Fee---------- > 178, 578.00 Will Call-----> $3 . 00 Payments > 178, 578.00 BALANCE DUE--------- > $0. 00 *+s**sss***s*********s*************************************ss*sssssss*sss*s*sssss*s*ssss*ss*ssssssss*ss*sss*s*****s***********ssss****ssss*ss*sss Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/06/2007 jpiano Action: AP Approved with the additional work to the pl Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITION OF APPROVAL Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVA%CFi BYff0FAqiE AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM -4 PM. OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER C5 ,u n2 I,4 C1"Z)A_^ APPLICATION WILL OT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIGN D 7) ~ L c3- Project I~--a ( - Building Permit ronsJ Plumbing Permit - - 970-479-2149 Ins eTOM *Val ( ) 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 TOWN OF VAIL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Plumbing Contractor: Town of Vail Reg. No.: 11 Contact Person and Phone #'s: ~ ~ 33 P E-Mail Address: AkrFax J -V VALUATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT (Labor & Materials) PLUMBING: $ I.f251.5 7Q, 00 - Cnn>fai-/ Fa/f~P ~/f//ntv d CCPCC/frC n) CP at q7n-_37R-Rf an nr visit www_ eaa/e-rnunty_ rnm fnr Park--/ Parcel# c(- IC "A"IC U' IC CSI Job Name: _ E Job Address: ~J E L /`C O.gfl Legal Description la~ a l Block: Filing: Subdivision:.~ fi-(L I` Owners Name: Address: r l r 1~C C. 1 Phone: Engineer: Address: /,V '611/ Phone: q16 _ 9F' 60O Detailed description of work: CEO i° C.U L • ~S f .2 Work Class: New ()o Addition( ) Alteration( ) Repair ( ) Other ( ) Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Duplex ( ) Multi-family ( ) Commercial) Restaurant ( ) Other ( ) No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: _4~_ No. of Accommodation Units in this building: ***********************************FOR OFFICE USE ONLY******************************* F: \cdev\FORMS\PERMITS\Building\plumbi ng_permit_1 1-23-2005.doc TOWN OF VAIL _ Page 1 of 1 11/23/2005 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R070001226 Amount: $178,578.00 07/12/200703:43 PM Payment Method: Check Init: JS Notation: 317903/LAYTON CONST. CO Permit No: P07-0095 Type: PLUMBING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-0101-6 Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 13 VAIL ROAD Total Fees: 178,578.00 This Payment: $178,578.00 Total ALL Pmts: 178,578.00 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 35,715.00 PP 00100003111100 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES 142,860.00 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00