HomeMy WebLinkAboutB06-0196 Revision 47 (Landscaping), Revision 48 (Mechanical Revision), Revision 49 (Ski Rental & Sales Office, Revision 50 (Mechanical Site Instruction)TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970 - 479 -2138
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT
Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL
Location.....: 1 VAIL ROAD
Parcel No...: 210107101016
OWNER VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC
50 S SIXTH ST STE 1480
MINNEAPOLIS
MN 55402
CONTRACTOR DOUG THOMPSON, DIR. OF
HYDER CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTOR HYDER CONSTRUCTION, INC
543 SANTA FE DRIVE
DENVER
CO 80204
License: 109 -A
CONTRACTOR RICK CAUDEL,
HYDER CONSTRUCTION
APPLICANT VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC- THOMAS
600 FOSHAY TOWER
821 MARQUETTE AVE.
MINNEAPOLIS
MN 55402
License: C000001981
Status ...:
ISSUED
Applied..:
07/18/2006
Issued . ..
07/26/2010
Expires. .:
09/26/2007
07/19/2006
PRECO 03/18/2010 Phone: 720 - 932 -3264, DIRECT
06/11/2009 Phone: 303 - 825 -1313
03/18/2010 Phone: 970 -471 -6036, RICK'S CEL
07/19/2006 Phone: 612 - 332 -1500
Permit # B06 -0196
Project #: PRJ03 -0468
Desciption:
FOUR SEASONS HOTEL - CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION
CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL
SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION
FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS.
Occupancy Type
NIGHT CLUBS (A2) ZONE 4 IB
CHURCHES (A3) ZONE 4 IB
BUSINESS(B)& HMP (H5 ZONE 4 IB
EDUCATIONAL (E) ZONE 4 IB
INDUSTRIAL /MOD HAZ ( ZONE 4 IB
MERCANTILE (M) ZONE 4 IB
RESIDENTIAL /HOTELS ( ZONE 4 IB
RESIDENTIAL /MULTFAM( ZONE 4 IB
STORAGE /MOD HAZ (Sl) ZONE 4 IB
STORAGE /LOW HAZ(S2) ZONE 4 IB
Additional
Totals...
Factor
299.08
369.90
300.40
322.53
183.77
220.56
302.22
250.22
169.75
167.15
Amount...
Sq Feet Valuation
27,353 $8,180,735.24
8,605 $3,182,989.50
31,130 $9,351,452.00
670 $216,095.10
29,600 $5,439,592.00
2,445 $539,269.20
86,991$26,290,420.02
133,695$33,453,162.90
23,080 $3,917,830.00
75,773$12,665,456.95
10,000.00
399,510$103,247,002.9*
TOV Adjusted Valuation: 3,247,002.91 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Revised Total Valuation: $247,002.91
##*######## f##*# 4## f*########*####*## f # * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #k # *# FEE SUMMARY *#*##*********#*##*##* 4**### k4 * * * # * * * * * * # * * * * #4 * *k# * * #f * #f **
Building - - - - -> 378, 813.95 Restuarant Plan Review - -> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees --- > 157, 360.90
Plan Check --- > 378,813.95 Recreation Fee --- ---------- > 399,510.00 Additional Fees — -------- > $ 20,619.25
Investigation -> $0.00 TOTAL FEES --- — -------- > 157, 360.90 Total Permit Fee — -------- > 177, 980.15
Will Call - - -> $ 3.00 Payments ------ — ----------- > 177, 980.15
'i BALANCE DUE --------- > $ 0.00
Approvals:
Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
08/17/2006 MROYER Action: DN Corrections e- mailed to applicant.
12/18/2006 cdavis Action: PA For Staging plan and trailer set for plan c
stamped
by TOV 12/13/06.
An electrical permit is required for the temp power proposed for the trailer.
03/29/2007 MROYER Action: PA IR :1215- G &E permit approval only. Conditic
apply.
03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP To Allow Release for G & E Phase Only
06/12/2007 CDAVIS Action: PA Tower Crane footing pads.
No additional fees assessed
07/16/2007 jplano Action: CR Additional work being requested to be adder
phasing, correction letter sent.
08/01/2007 jplano Action: CR Second correction letter sent, insuffient
7 information
s
supplied.
i
3) The submittal is to include all drawings related to the work that is requested
I added
) work
full
to the phasing. All drawings are to be stamped by the associated design profession
architect and /or engineer. The design professionals are to verify that the additi(
being requested is not in conflict with the corrections that are requested regard_
building permit.
All sheets are to be stamped and signed by the associated design professional. Th(
architectural and the plumbing sheets have not been stamped. The stamp on the stri
sheets has not been signed. The stamp on the electrical sheets has not been signet
4 There is insufficient detail to approve this submittal. Some examples are:
a) There are several sections that are pertinent to this request that are not pros
b) The elevator pit sections 10/S4.04, 18/S4.04, 19/S4.04, 20/S4.04 are missing.
c) Ramp transition section 22/S6.01, 6/S6.01, 7/S4.04 are missing
d) Exterior foundation wall connection to the matt slab 9 /S6.01D, 27/S6.01, 6 /S.0_
7/S6.01
e) Sump pit details 28/S4.04 and 29/S4.04
f) Column schedule, transition of the columns to slab?
g) Slab steps 11 /S6.01D.
This review has stopped because of lack of information.
5 The Public Works Department in Vail has not approved the submittal for additionE
to
be added to the phasing. Their approval will be necessary.
08/06/2007 jplano Action: PA Additional work approved for phasing. Under
plumbing, underground electrical, rebar and concrete placement for elevator and si
pits. NO
APPROVAL FOR MAT SLAB
only.
09/11/2007 jplano Action: AP Full permit approved, see conditions
10/22/2007 DPLACE Action: PA REV 4 IR 5881: Approved shop drawings for
No charge.
10/22/2007
dplace
Action:
PA
CHARGE.
12/04/2008
jplano
Action: AP
11/13/2007
ependley
Action:
AP
stamps. No
added valuation.
wood above
11/15/2007
ependley
Action:
AP
valuation.
Added plan
review fee of
$60.00 due
11/30/2007
jplano
Action:
AP
valuation.
01/02/2009
Added plan
review fee of
$60.00 due
12/18/2007
JPLANO
Action:
AP
tension
slabs, no
added valuation
12/26/2007
jplano
Action:
AP
cable
for
016
hours
023A,
with thickened slab. $120.00 due
12/27/2007 MROYER Action: AP
REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAI
REV5/IR6042. Approved shop drawings for de:
Rev7 /IR6058. Approved RFI -0237, No added
Rev6 /IR6057. Approved RFI -0221, No added
Rev9/IR6236. Approved shop drawings for po:
Rev10 /IR6252. Approved changing a post ten:
Revll/IR6266,6267. Rebar shop drawings rev:
appropiate stamps, no charge
03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA REV 12 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER LAYTON Si
#05510 -004 (EMBEDS @ LEVEL 1, 2, 3 ns 4) FROM JT STEEL NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE
03/24/2008 CDAVIS Action: PA REV.13 SAFEBUILT REFERENCE NUMBER SUBMITTAI
(STUD RAILS, LEVELS 4 & 5) FROM SUNCOAST NO ADDTIONAL CHARGE
06/10/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev14,15,16, IR6685,6687,7744 are approved .
of plan review due, $720.00
07/08/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 19, IR 7989 are approved,
10,25,29,31,35,40 - 8 hours of plan review due, $480.00
08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev17, IR 7777 are approved,
Bulletins
Bulletins 023
swimming pool revisions, $360 due
08/01/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev 20, IR8245 are approved, storm and sew(
connetions outside the building, public works has approved it. No charge trom Sat(
09/29/2008 jplano Action: AP Rev18, IR7988 are approved. The sub -duct si
for
the dryers
and range
hoods are not approved. 46 hours of plan
review due = $2760.(
12/04/2008
jplano
Action: AP
Rev22/IR9384 - This is
the revised ADMOD t(
exterior
wood above
40 This
is to be approved
by the fire department
to be issued. No chi
from SB
12/18/2008
jplano
Action: AP
Rev23/IR9488, Additional tire- stopping subr
approved,
no charge
01/02/2009
jplano
Action: AP
Rev21 /IR9008, Approved
Bulletins 036, 037,
040,
043, 044, 050, 051, 052, 055, 056 and firestopping submittal.
055, generator fueling needs fire department approval prior to issuance
056, deck extention needs DRB approval prior to issuance
29 hours of plan review due = $1740.00
02/09/2009 jplano Action: NA Rev24/IR9666 - Fire Alarm Plans to be appr(
the
fire department
02/09/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev25/IR9587 - 11 3M Fire Resistive Wrap 15A'
approved
for HVAC ducting as shown on apporved plans. 2 hours of plan review Due = $120.00
02/10/2009 jplano Action: AP Rev26/IR9663 - Subduct system for resident:
dryer
by
Y value
system approved. 8 hours of plan review due = $480.00
04/16/2009 jplano Action: CR Rev27, IR9840 - Bulletins 59 -73, correctioi
sent, revisions needed and full sized drawings for collation
04/23/2009 jplano Action: CR Rev28, IR9926 - Submittal to be stamped an(
FPE. This is the exit passageway conditions.
05/28/2009 ependley Action: AP Rev28/IR9926 approved. No added valuation.
plan review at $240.00
06/18/2009 jeaton Action: AP REV 27 /IR # 9840 approved by Satebuilt. No
& no added square footage. Invoiced 10 Hours of Plan Review at $600.00
09/30/2009 JEaton Action: AP Rev 29 IR #10435 Approved Bulletin 110 Therr
Insulation No added Valuation 3 hrs @ $60 per hr = $180.00 JEaton
01/04/2010 ependley Action: AP Rev 28/IR9926 Classification of tire -rated
diffusers
approved. 2 -Hr /Plan Review $120.00 due
01/26/2010 EPendley Action: AP Rev 30 IR# 10731 Approved ** *May need Plani
approval for additional railings added along west side of building at employee
corridor. * ** 2
hrs plan review @$60 per hr = $120 Jae
02/11/2010 EPendley Action: CR Rev 31 IR #10750 Denied Correction Required
02.11.10
03/08/2010 DGoodman Action: AP Rev 32 IR# 10795 Approved No Added Valuati(
** *Bulletins #071- #121R * ** 6.5 hours @$60.00 per hr = $390.00 Jae
03/09/2010 EPendley Action: DN Rev 33 IR #10849 Denied Revisions Required
03 .09.10
03/16/2010 EPendley Action: AP Rev 35 IR# 10868 Revision to Bulletin 123R
Approved
See FAL for details 2 hrs plan review @ $60 = $120 Jae
03/16/2010 ependley Action: AP Rev #31 IR10750 First Structural repair pa(
approved for construction. No added valuation. Total Plan review tee due = $3701.:
being hand delivered to Vail on 3/17/10
03/22/2010 ependley
comments generated and
03/22/2010 ependley
comments generated sent
03/22/2010 ependley
comments generated sent
Action: DN
sent to contra
Action: DN
to applicant
Action: DN
to applicant
Structural Repair submittal #2 Rev 33 IR 1(
ictor and FOR on 3/22/10
Strucutal Repair submittal #3 Rev #34 IR 1(
and FOR on 3/22/10
Strucutal Repair submittal #4 Rev #36 IR 1(
and FOR on 3/22/10
04/01/2010 ependley Action: AP Structural Repair submittal #2 Rev 33 IR 1(
approved. No added value total tee due = $1,102.50. The package will be hand delis
Vail on 4/2/2010. Contractor has also been notitied of cost to generate a check r(
04/09/2010 ependley Action: AP Structural Repair Submittal 3 Rev 34 IR108(
approved
Total cost = $1,625.50
No added valuation stated
a 04/09/2010 ependley Action: AP Structural Repair Submittal 4 Rev 36 IR 10E
approved
Total cost = $1,215.00
No added valuation stated
04/13/2010 sgremmer Action: AP REv 39 IR 11036 Bulletin 130 approved
1.5 hrs of plan review completed $90.00 in plan review tees due No added valuatioi
04/16/2010 ependley Action: DN Rev 38 IR 11035 comments generatd and sent
applicant via email 4/16/10
04/16/2010 ependley Action: DN REv 40 IR11066 comments generated and sent
applicant 4/16/10 Alt. Analy. Responses
04/21/2010 ependley Action: AP Rev 40 IR 11066 Alt. Analysis request appr(
sent to Vail on 4/20/10 This approval is for L /H /N dated 4/14/10 identitied as "C(
Repair
Submittal #16" Alt. Analysis Procedure Response
Total Fees due = $652.50
04/26/2010 ependley Action: AP Rev41 IR11087 Bulletin 128 for condo 6 apps
4/26/10
Plan review fee of $180.00 due
05/05/2010 ependley Action: AP Rev42 IR11088 Structural repair package # £
approved
Total of $322.50 due. No added valuation stated
05/07/2010 ependley Action: AP Rev 38 IR11035 Structural repair package 11
approved
Total due = $592.50 No added valuation stated
05/18/2010 ependley Action: AP Rev 37 SAFEbuilt IR 11030 Structural columi
submittals are approved. Hand delivered to Vail 5/18/10
Total Fees Due = $1365.00
No added vaulation
05/20/2010 MH Action: AP
06/11/2010 mdenney Action: AP Rev. No. 37/ RFI 3339 Hybrid Detail L8 -15 t
IR #11266
Plan Review Fee = $217.50
06/11/2010 mdenney Action: AP Rev. No. 43/ Structural Repairs: Final Rev:
Package
IR #11266
Plan Review Fee = $570.00
06/28/2010 ependley Action: AP
Plan review fee of $60.00 due
06/28/2010 ependley Action: AP
Rev 44 IR 11375 Site lighting revisions apF
Rev 46 IR 11377 light tixture changes RFI
approved
$60.00 plan review fee due. No added valuation
07/09/2010 ependley Action: AP Bulletin 122 Rev 47 IR 11438 appproved
2 hours of plan review due = $120.00
07/09/2010 ependley Action: AP Bulletin 124 Rev 48 IR 11439 appproved
2 hours of plan review due = $120.00
07/09/2010 ependley Action: AP Bulletin 125 Rev 49 IR 11440 appproved
2 hours of plan review due = $120.00
07/16/2010 ependley Action: AP Rev 50 IR 11441 Bulletin 90R Mechanical Sit
Instruction approved Fee Due = $120.00
No added valuation stated
Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the H<
Cross
Utility relocation permit request. The applicant shall remove only those trees wh:
absolutely necessary for the utility relocation work.
10/20/2006 Warren Action: AP The Planning Department has approved the
application
to dewater the site.
03/31/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning recieved a bond to cover the Grad:
Excavation in the amount of 3.2 million. Planning has approved the grading and ex(
permit.
06/25/2007 Warren Action: COND Planning has approved the full building pei
dated recieved on May 29, 2007, with a single condition. A complete Design Review
aplication
will need to be submitted for review and approval for the additonal set of stairs
from
:N
the pool deck to West Meadow Drive.
08/20/2007 Warren Action: AP The set of plans provided to allow fro the
some work prior to release of a full building permit has been approved. The plans
date
stamped July 26, 2007
09/05/2007 Warren Action: AP Planning is approving the set of plans date
August 3,
2007, with the condition that the applicant submits a revised landscaping plan to]
and
approval prior to requesting a TCO.
11/02/2007 GRUTHER Action: AP REV 3,IR 5512: SHOP DRAWINGS. NO ADDITIONAI
CHARGE.
06/12/2008 Warren Action: AP The planning departmetn signs off on Bullet
and
23A with one condition. The gate on teh new set of stairs shat be as the base of t
stairs
on the pool deck not on the top of the stairs adjacent to Meadow Drive.
09/26/2008 Warren Action: CR Regarding the above permit my only comment
I
Four
need a detail of the gate at the top of the stairs serving as an exit from the po<
This detail shall be depict the desired gate which fits not only the aesthetics of
Season but that of the Meadow Drive streetscape. The design should take into accoi
need
for security from the public side of the fence and be design with this in mind. F<
example
the Town does not want to see a nice gate submitted, approved, and installed and t
because
of security reason we add a piece of plexi -glass to the gate as an afterthought.
plans
are dated 5 -8 -08 Bullentin #40.
02/10/2010 Warren Action: CR The changes contained in Revision 30 are nc
approved
by Planning are not approved. There is a gate and railing on the west elevation wt
not
have DRB approval which is necessary. This is adjacent to the employee housing un:
02/17/2010 Warren Action: CR Bulletin #123 needs to be revised to remove
gates
and railings adjacent to the Four Seasons employee housing. Revised plans should t
arriving
in 4 days.
03/05/2010 Warren Action: AP Bulletin #123R has been approved by plannii
railings were removed from the employee housing level.
03/19/2010 Warren Action: AP Rev. 32 - Bulletins #071 through #121R have
approved by planning.
Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT
07/20/2006 McGee Action: DN Plans submitted dated 4/14/06 and received
04/17/06.
Note: Review was postponed pending evidence project was proceeding.
Review:
s on
t
south
3
i
the
Fire Apparatus Access and Egress Plan is Denied:
1. Fire Dept staging on south side of project is shown on east end. The apporved
the west end. The hydrant on the west end is not shown either. No FDC is shown on
side. Sheet A0.3.00
2. Sheet A0.3.05 does not show an acceptable route to the interior of the buildinc
Fire Command Center.
3. The plans submitted by RJA are not stamped and are labeled "Not for Constructic
4. The plans show a dead end corridor behind the front desk.
5.
12/19/2006 McGee Action: PA Permission to locate job site trailer is gi
Relocate electrical disconnect to the trailer or provide ready access on southwest
site. Location as proposed on plan submitted 12/13/06 is not accepted.
03/22/2007 mvaughan Action: PA g and e permit is approved
03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E only
07/11/2007 McGee Action: AP Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3A approved for l:
work
as submitted 7 11 07.
09/07/2007 McGee Action: AP
Life Safety Report 5 22 07
The full permit is approved as noted:
1. LSR, MOU's, and Admin Mod's must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire Protect:
Engineer
of Record.
2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre - function and ballroom is not
accepted.
RJA alledgedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence ha:
been
presented.
3. Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted.
4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans, is not accepted.
5. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additionE
review.
12/08/2008
MAH
Action:
AP
Rev21 /IR9008 - This is the
revised ADMOD f<
exterior
classification
t
03/02/2010
t
wood above
40 This
is to be approved
by the fire department to
be issued. No chE
from
03/17/2010
MVAUGHAN
Action: AP
Bulletins 95 -115 are approved.
SB. PER VERBAL FROM
MIKE VAUGHAN,
OK TO
APPROVE FOR FIRE.
Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS
02/25/2009
drhoades
Action:
AP
Permanent location of FDC
for South side of
building.
is
Action: PA
Approval to allow grading and prep work foi
installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for t
'. site
03/26/2009
mcgee
Action:
AP
Sub duct revisions 1 27 09
per RJA
1. Add clean out of lint traps to OEM manual for project.
09/25/2009 mvaughan Action: AP revision dated 4/20/2009 revisions to two t
exit
passageways.
02/19/2010
mvaughan
Action: AP
revision 33 and revisions to diffuser
classification
t
03/02/2010
t
mvaughan
Action: AP
revisions to diffuser are numbered 32, and
approved.
03/17/2010
MVAUGHAN
Action: AP
Bulletins 95 -115 are approved.
05/21/2010
mvaughan
Action: AP
architects bulletin 128, dated 3/10/10
Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS
s 10/20/2006
is
Action: DN
Awaiting for additional information
12/20/2006
is
Action: PA
Approval to allow grading and prep work foi
installation of their construction trailer. A PW permit has also been issued for t
'. site
access for
small construction vehicles
ONLY, off of W. Meadow Drive.
3 03/26/2007
is
Action: PA
Staging plan for Phase 1 of the G &E permit
approved
only. Engineer approval
for the G &E permit still required currently under review.
staging plan approval still required which requires CDOT approval.
03/29/2007 cdavis Action: AP For G & E Only
08/07/2007 csalli Action: AP additional work proposed for phased permit
approved,
no approval for mat slab
09/13/2007 csalli Action: DN waiting for executed MOU
10/04/2007 TK Action: AP Approved Building Permit with the condtion:
in
the memo dated 8/5/07 from Chad Salli.
07/31/2008 csalli Action: AP revised sheets C17, C20 dated 7/18/08 and
C18,
C18A, C19 dated 7/1/08 approved
Item: 05550 ENGINEERING CIVILS
Item: 05700 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Item: 05101 BUILDING DEPT REVISION
05/20/2010 Martin Action: AP Revision number 133 hallway hght. and widtt
revison
per Fire protection engineer report
See Conditions section of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,
and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all
Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review
approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY -FOUR H ADVANCE BY TE ff0 ICE AT 149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM
- 4 PM.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER
************************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Permit # B06 -0196 as of 07 -26 -2010 Status: ISSUED
************************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Permit Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT
Applicant: VAIL DEVELOPMENT,LLC- THOMAS J. BRINK
612 - 332 -1500
Job Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL
Location: 1 VAIL ROAD
Parcel No: 210107101016
Description:
FOUR SEASONS HOTEL - CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 STORY POST TENSION
CONCRETE BUILDING FOR FOUR SEASONS RESORTS. INCLUDES FULL
SERVICE HOTEL, RESTAURANT, SPA, POOL, RECREATION
FACILITIES, CONDO FRACTIONAL UNITS AND GUESTROOMS.
Conditions:
Cond: CON0008815
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
3/28/07
To: Hill- Glazier Architects
Attn: Douglas Atmore
925 Alma Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Applied: 07/18/2006
Issued: 07/26/2010
To Expire: 09/26/2007
The following comments were generated during the review of documents submitted for grading and
excavation permit. The review team has found no issues that will impact the grading and excavation
for this project. All of the comments listed below will need to be incorporated into the full
building permit response for review and approval. The numbers below correspond with the original
comment number for clarity.
General: Several responses are indicating the use of an "intervening vestibule" to prevent a room
that is not normally occupied from opening directly into an exit enclosure. The response is
indicating that the intervening vestibule be "rated as a corridor ". The Fire and Life Safety Report
prepared by Rolf Jensen and Associates dated February 21, 2007 as last modified, states the
vestibule be separated by 2 hour assemblies with 90 minute opening protection. Opening protection
shall be automatic closing; self closing would allow the door to be propped open by the occupants.
These will be required for full permit issuance.
General: The Fire & Life Safety Report dated February 21, 2007 was submitted with the packet per
the agreement from 03/13/2007. The applicant understood that this is not the final document and
modifications will be required for full building permit. Everyone at the meeting agreed that future
changes will not impact the grading and excavation permit approval. All issue must be resolved
prior to the approval for full building permit.
3) The layout of the exiting in this area requires that the occupants of Stair Q to utilize this
exit balcony. The occupants are required to travel past unprotected openings serving employee units
3005 and 3006. Change these openings to maintain the same protection as the exit enclosure that is
discharging.
8) See the general comment above. This exit passageway, C -414, is actually a horizontal portion of
Stair D. Either 90 minute rated doors are required to separate the stairs from the passageway or
remove the designation of passageway.
10) See the general comment above.
11) See the general comment above.
12) See the general comment above.
13) See the general comment above.
16) See the general comment above.
22) For the review team to approve a window in the passageway the window will be required to be
tested in accordance with ASTME 119, tested as a wall assembly, and has a minimum fire- resistance
rating not less than the fire- resistance rating of the wall. Provide specific documentation on the
window when responding for full building permit.
23) See the general comment above.
39) Please add the total number of occupants and the occupant load of the driving floor at each
exit discharge location. Specifically, stair Q and F as the number of these occupants will be a
factor in determining exit components size outside the enclosures.
Stair F discharges onto the exit balcony. The occupants from the stair enclosure are not added to
the occupant already shown exiting on the balcony. Please add the occupants from the stair to the
exit balcony totals and amend exiting accordingly widths accordingly. This item has no impact on
the issuance of a grading and excavation permit, but will be required at the time of full building
permit issuance.
42) See response the comment number 39.
46) Egress from Vestibule 210A requires traveling through the CO -ED Lounge/Waiting Area. This space
is not accessory.
46A) It has come to the review team's attention that there is a possible issue with common path of
travel of travel from the rooms exiting into Vestibule 210A as there is no access to stair Q.
Please supply an illustration showing compliance to common path of travel.
49) The common path of travel issues within the residential units will be required to be approved
by the Town of Vail's Building Official.
57 through 61 and 149) The issues regarding use of wood in and on this building will be addressed
when full building permit comments are submitted and reviewed.
Cond: 1
(FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED.
Cond: 12
(BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
Cond: 14
(BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE
MATERIAL.
Cond: 17
(BLDG.): A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL CHANGES BEFORE A FR/
INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL.
Cond: 34
(BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED
Cond: 35
(P.W.): ACCESS AND DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BEFORE FOOTING INSPECTION.
Cond: 40
(BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72.
Cond: 5
(PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION, AN IMPROVEME
LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A
MINIMUM
OF FORTY -EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPR
SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE ILC.
Cond: CON0009095
The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review aplication for review and approval for the
additonal set of stairs added from the pool deck to West Meadow Drive, within 30 days of the
release of the building permit.
Cond: CON0009121
The applicant shall submit a seperate Design Review application for review and approval for all
signage design, locations, and materials prior to installation.
Cond: CON0009294
The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan which addresses the landscaping conflicts
created by the shallow soild depths on the culvert containing Spraddle Creek. This plan shall be
reviewed and approved prior to requesting a certifcate of occupancy.
Cond: CON0009330
SAFEbuilt Colorado Conditions of Approval
To: Layton Construction
Re: Full Building Permit Conditions of Approval
The following conditions will be required to be addressed prior to construction. Sufficient time
shall be granted for review, response and approval before work is initiated.
Building Department -
The items listed within the building department comments are numbered to correspond with the 3
round comment letter dated 08/21/2007.
46. Change the exiting from Vestibule 210A. It appears to exit through intervening room that is not
accessory to the vestibule.
HGA Response: We submit that the adjacent space is accessory.
Vestibule 210A services mechanical rooms and the service elevators. To exit from Vestibule 210A the
occupants have to pass through Vestibule 275A, which is basically for the spa staff, then through
the CO -ED Lounge/Waiting area, then to hallway 279, then through exit passageway 293, then through
exit passageway 297, then to exit discharge.
The issue is that the CO -ED Lounge /Waiting area is not accessory to the mechanical rooms. It is
accessory for the rooms off Vestibule 275A for the staff of the spa but not the mechanical areas.
Please change the layout accordingly.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Vestibule 210A is purely circulation space and does not carry an
occupant load. This vestibule provides connection between the Spa and the service elevators, IDF
Room 210, and Mechanical Room 257. Relative to egress, it provides the egress route for the one
occupant from IDF 210 and the one occupant from Mechanical 257 (as shown on A0.3.02). IDF 210,
Mechanical 257, Vestibule 210A, and Service Elevator Lobby E -202 are considered to be part of the
overall Spa as they serve Spa functions. The service elevators stop at this location solely to
provide connection to the Spa. IDF 210 houses audio - visual, telephone, and data system equipment
that specifically serves the Spa and must be accessed by Spa personnel. Similarly, Mechanical 257
houses the equipment serving the pools within Room 255 and must be accessed by Spa staff. In
summary, we submit that all these spaces are part of the overall Spa and are "accessory" to each
other. Therefore, current layout provides egress that complies with IBC 1013.2 as the spaces are
accessory, are not hazard occupancies, and provide a discernible path of travel to an exit.
This comment is in reference to the electrical room 4212. Please revise
64. A2.03.1 - Wall tag both shafts located in room 304 (storage room). Wall tags must reference an
approved assembly from the partition schedule.
HGA Response: Wall tag has been added.
One shaft in room 304 does not have wall tags.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The drawing has been updated to include wall tags for this shaft.
Still have one shaft not tagged
Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection
through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical
and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical
responses on the architectural drawings.
152. Provide accessible parking spaces per IBC Table 1106.1. Providing 212 spaces would require 7
to be accessible, 2 of those to be van accessible. Verify 98" of vertical clearance for the van
spots.
HGA Response: We submit that the number of accessible parking stalls complies with IBC Table
1106.1 and section 1106.5. The hotel is operating on 100% valet parking stalls, with an additional
59 self -park stalls for fractional ownership, full ownership, and employee. Per Table 1106.1, 3
stalls are required for the self - parking, and at least one of the three is required to be van
accessible.
Plan sheet A0.3.01 indicates there are 228 parking spaces. Spaces marked for Valet parking number
78. With those counts, Table 1106.1.3 would require 5 accessible spaces with one van accessible
space.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Per previous response, most of the parking spaces are valet only. There
are 59 self -park stalls that will be allocated to fractional ownership, full ownership condos, and
employees. The drawings have been updated to identify each space as either valet or self -park. We
submit that only the 59 self -park stalls are considered per Table 1106.1 and that the number of
accessible spaces required are provided.
Deducting the 78 Valet parking from the total spaces, you are still required to add two additional
accessible spaces for a total number of 5 accessible spaces.
155. All the massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible. Please amend the toilet
facilities, changing rooms, lavatories, tubs and the showers meet to accessibility requirements of
the ANSI A117.1 -98. (IBC 1109.14.3)
HGA Response: We submit the Wet Massage Suite #289 complies with the accessibility requirements of
ANSI A117.1 -98 (IBC 1109.14.3).
All massage rooms on the 2nd level are required to be accessible.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We disagree that IBC 1109.14.3 requires that ALL spa treatment rooms be
accessible. IBC 1109.14 pertains to "recreational facilities ". If the Spa is going to be considered
a "recreational facility" then it should be considered as a whole. As such, the Spa is accessible -
it provides accessibility at the entry/reception, locker rooms, toilets, showers, whirlpools,
lounges, treatment rooms, etc. We submit that nothing requires ALL treatment rooms to be accessible
any more than ALL lockers, ALL toilets, or ALL showers.
Add grab bars at the tub in room 289 for accessibility.
167. We are unable to locate a designated accessible Type "A" condominium per Section 1107.6.2 of
the 2003 IBC. As the condominiums are a different type of R -2 occupancy from the time -share units,
an accessible Type "A" condominium is required.
HGA Response: Since only 16 condominiums are proposed, no Type "A" units are required. Refer to IBC
1107.6.2.1.1.
With the condominiums, employee housing and timeshare units there are a total of 63 units
classified as an R -2 occupancy group. Per Section 1107.6.2.1.1 Type A units shall be dispersed
among the various classes of units. Therefore a Type A accessible unit is required in each of the
following groups: the condominiums, the employee housing, and the timeshare units.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): To resolve this issue we have revised Condo #8 (on Level 9, sheet
A4.28.1)) to be a "Type A" unit per ICC /ANSI Al 17.1. Two accessible employee housing units and one
accessible timeshare unit are already provided and indicated on the drawings.
Comment 169 -180 - Submit a Memorandum of Understanding to the Town of Vail for approval by the
Building Official to reference the 2003 ICC /ANSI A- 117.1. If accepted by the town, please revise
entire plan to comply with the 2003 ICC /ANSI A -117.1 in its entirety. If not accepted please revise
plans per 1998 ANSI A -117.1 and comments above.
169. In the accessible units in the guest rooms of the R -1 occupancy, all bathing & toilet
facilities are required to be accessible per Chapter 6 of ANSI A117.1.
HGA Response: We submit that the accessible units include the accessible bathing and toilet
facilities and comply with Chapter 6 of ANSI A117.1.
Plan sheet A4.07.1 A and A4.07.1 B for Unit PR -HC shows a raised platform in media room # 116 which
does not have an accessible route. Also, bathrooms /rooms # 103, # 108, # 109, # 110, # 133 do not show
compliance for wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water
closet seat heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible
lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): The raised platform within Media 116 is intended to provide tiered
seating within this "home theater ". We submit that an accessible route is not required for this
small platform as it is less than 25% of the overall room and the remainder of the room is
accessible. While this room is not an "assembly" space, we submit that IBC 1108.2.4.1, exception 2
provides guidance regarding this room. See below regarding accessible bathrooms.
Plan sheet A4.06.1 for Unit 2KK -HC has bathrooms /rooms #103, #108 which do not show compliance for
wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat
heights, accessible bathtubs and showers, bathtub and shower controls, accessible lavatories, and
door maneuvering clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response
(7/18/07): See below regarding accessible bathrooms.
Plan sheet A4.05.3 for Unit 1 K -HC has bathroom # 103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair
turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights,
accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show
required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below regarding
accessible bathrooms.
Plan sheet A4.04AA for Unit ES2 -HC has bathroom # 103 which does not show compliance for
wheelchair turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat
heights, accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering
clearances. Show required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): See below
regarding accessible bathrooms.
Plan sheet A4.01.1 for Unit K1 -H1 has bathroom #103 which does not show compliance for wheelchair
turning space, toilet compartment size and clearances, grab bars, water closet seat heights,
accessible showers, shower controls, accessible lavatories, and door maneuvering clearances. Show
required clear floor spaces for all rooms. HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Unit type K1 -HI is a unit
for the hearing impaired. It is not an accessible unit.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We submit that only one accessible bathroom is required within an
accessible hotel unit. This requirement is consistent with the federal standard - ADAAG Chapter 9.
To interpret IBC Chapter 11 as requiring that ALL bathrooms must be accessible is to raise the
standard beyond the federal requirements. We submit that this is not reasonable, does not reflect
industry standard, and is not the intent of the IBC / ICC.
Rather, we submit that the IBC / ICC intends to coordinate and correlate with the federal
standards. As an example, we can examine the accessibility requirements for condominiums. The
federal standard is the FHA Fair Housing Design Manual. This document allows condo units to be
provided with one "Specification B" bathroom and that is the highest level of accessibility.
Similarly, the 2003 edition of ICC / ANSI Al 17.1 has been revised to better correlate to FHA and
require that "Type A" units provide "at least one" accessible bathroom . The common thread is the
requirement is for one or "at least one" accessible bathroom - not all.
Since the ADAAG, FHA Design Manual, and A117 (2003) all require one or "at least one" accessible
bathroom it is reasonable to interpret the IBC's requirements in the same manner. Otherwise, all
the hotel units would be held to a higher standard than the condominium units within the same
building.
170. In Type "A" dwelling units of the R -2 occupancies, all toilet and bathing facilities must
comply with Sections 1002.11.1 through 1002.11.7 of ANSI A117.1. Some Type "A" dwelling units have
bathrooms which do not comply. Please clarify.
HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167.
See response to comment # 167.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): We request that ICC /ANSI Al 17.1 - 2003 be used as the applicable
edition relative to the "Type A" condominium. This is the most recent version of Al 17 and our
research has found that the various revisions in Chapter 10 were intended to correct the intent of
various provisions and to better coordinate with federal requirements (FHA and ADA). Per 1003.11.1
of the A117 -2003, at least one bathroom is required to comply with 1003.11. This correlates with
FHA requirements ( "Specification B" bathrooms) and Chapter 9 of the ADA. Therefore, we submit that
the latest intent of the various codes and standards is that at least one bathroom, but not all, is
required to comply with 1003.11.
171. In Type "A" dwelling units, a permanent seat is required at the head end of the bathtub per
Section 607 of ANSI A 117.1.
HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167.
See response to comment # 167.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): ICC /ANSI A117.1 - 1998, 607.3 states that a permanent seat OR a
removable in -tub seat shall be provided. However, 1002.11.6, exception 1, states that the removable
in -tub seat required by 607.3 is NOT required. Since 607.3 gives the option of either permanent or
removable seats, we submit that the true intent of 1002.11.6, exception 1 is to NOT require either
type of seat. ICC / ANSI A 117.1 - 2003 carries similar language, but also includes Figure 1003.11.8
(a) to clarify that the seat (permanent or removable) can be omitted.
172. In Type "A" dwelling units, clearance in front of bathtubs shall extend the length of the
bathtub and shall be 30 inches wide minimum per Section 607 of ANSI A 117.1. Some of the bathtubs
have lavatories encroaching into the required clearances.
HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167.
See response to comment # 167.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required bathtub clear floor area is
indicated.
173. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.11.1 of ANSI A117.1, doors shall not swing into
the clear floor or ground space or clearance for any fixture, unless a clear floor space of 30
inches minimum by 48 inches minimum is located beyond the arc of the door swing. There are water
closet compartments and some other bathroom areas that do not meet those requirements.
HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167.
See response to comment # 167.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. The door swings do not swing into the other clear
floor spaces.
174. In Type "A" dwelling units, per Section 1002.13 of ANSI A117. 1, where operable windows are
provided, at least one window in each sleeping, living, or dining space shall have operable parts
complying with Section 1002.13 of ANSI A117.1. All windows of "accessible units" shall comply with
Section 309 of ANSI A117. 1, Operable Parts. Provide documentation showing compliance.
HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167.
See response to comment # 167.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1. A note has been added to indicate requirement that
all operable windows (and sliding doors) comply with 1002.13.
175. For Type "A" and "accessible units ", provide details showing accessibility compliance for the
operable parts of the showers, lavatory height, lavatory knee and toe clearance, and bathroom
mirror height per Section 1002.11 of ANSI A 117.1.
HGA Response: Refer to interior elevations shown within the Interior Design drawings.
I am unable to locate the Interior Design Drawings in the plan set submitted.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to accessibility details illustrated on sheet A0.4.3.
180. For Type "A" dwelling units, provide details showing accessibility compliance for kitchen work
surfaces, sinks, range controls, and refrigerator /freezer requirements per Section 1002.12 of ANSI
A117.1.
HGA Response: Refer to response to comment # 167.
See response to comment # 167.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to A4.28.1 where the required kitchen features are illustrated.
183. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the condominiums, some "U" shaped kitchens do not have the
required 60 inch minimum clearance between opposing base cabinets per Section 1003.12 of ANSI
A117.1.
HGA Response: Sheets A4.22.1, A4.25.1, and A4.30.1 have been revised to provide 60"
clearance at U- shaped kitchens.
Provide corrected plan sheets.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These sheets are included in the 7/18/07 resubmittal set.
185. In the Type "B" dwelling units of the time share units, the water closets do not have required
clearances and some doors encroach required clearances per Section 1003.11.2 of ANSI A117.1.
HGA Response: Refer to the response to comment # 186 below. As such, there are no Type "B"
timeshare units.
See response to comment # 186.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Refer to response to comment #186.
186. Is Option "A" being used for the bathroom fixtures in the Type "B ", Time -share units? If so,
each fixture is required to meet the requirements of the option per Section 1003.11.3.1 of ANSI
A] 17. 1. Please clarify.
HGA Response: As previously discussed and resolved, the timeshare units are transient occupancy
(similar to hotel units) and not residences. As such, one accessible timeshare unit is provided per
IBC Table 1107.6.1.1. This accessible unit is #3103 located on Level 03. The enlarged plan for this
accessible unit is on sheet A4.12.1 A and the associated H/C bathroom in 2/A4.12.2A.
Provide signed letters from persons representing the operating authority for this facility stating
that the timeshare units will not be used as residences.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): These letters will be submitted by ownership
203. Enclose both mechanical rooms on the 9th level in 2 hour rated construction, it appears that
the 2 hour shafts from below terminate in these rooms.
Rybka Response: Refer to sheet M4.06 (Part Plan Attachment No. M06). The Area 3A mechanical room is
unrated, and the 2 hour rated vertical risers through the building through the 8th floor slab. In
order to avoid the installation of inaccessible fire dampers at the top of the riser, RYBKA have
revised sheet M4.06 to ductwork is to be fire rated in the attic space. Exhaust fans located in
attic space are to be enclosed in two hour rated enclosures with fire -rated access doors for
service.
The Area 3B mechanical room is a 2 hour rated room that ends at column line A14. The ductwork that
extends to the south across column line A 14 is 2 hour fire rated to avoid the installation of fire
dampers in inaccessible locations. Fire dampers are shown in the penetrations of the two hour rated
Area 3B mechanical room, where ductwork exist the mechanical room.
A) The mechanical room on the 9th level over "AREA -03A "has not been addressed on the plan sheets.
The partial ninth floor plan on 8 '/2" x 11" indicate wrapping ducts. If duct wrap is used on the
fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be
installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function
and not over heat.
Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be enclosed in two
hour rated enclosures with fire -rated access doors for service. Ductwork is to be wrapped to
provide 2 hour fire rating in attic space. (Refer to Details 6, 7 and 8 on Sheet M6.03).
Provide architectural details rated enclosure.
B) In the mechanical room labeled 911 the rated walls do not appear to enclose the room entirely.
The wall is labeled 30 minutes on the north end and the wall is labeled 1 hour where Trash 912
(above "AREA -0313") is located on sheet A0.3.09. There are 3 duct penetrations in this area to be
addressed, 28x10 S/E FB, 24x18 G/e FB and 24x14 S/A F/A TB.
Rybka Response: Refer to Architectural Sheet A0.3.09 where Mechanical Room 911 is to be provided
with 2 hour rating. Three ducts identified enter riser shaft from Mechanical Room 911 and riser is
considered to be connected to and form part of mechanical room and so no fire smoke damper is
provided.
The ducts in question enter a shaft in the floor below within Maid Room G -711.
Fire /Smoke Dampers are required where these ducts enter the shaft. One duct is not in a shaft.
Please address accordingly.
C) How will the 2 hour shaft assembly be maintained at EF -14 and EF -30? If duct wrap is used on the
fans then an engineer judgment is required from the wrap company indicating how it is to be
installed on the fan housing and confirmation from the fan manufacturer that the fan will function
and not over heat.
Rybka Response: Refer to Sheet M4.06. Exhaust fans located in attic space are to be rated for
operation within rated enclosures by fan manufacturer or are to be relocated within Mechanical Room
911.
Provide architectural details for the shafts.
214. Add a fire /smoke damper to the penetration by the 8x6 duct that penetrates the 30 minute fire
partition on page M2.08.1 on grid line 11 and between A9 and A10.
Rybka Response: Fire dampers are not required in one hour rated fire barriers per IMC 607.5.2.
(Refer to Response No. 208.)
This is not a fire barrier; it is a fire partition defining a rated corridor. A fire /smoke damper
is required for this duct.
Rybka Response: Combination fire smoke damper is provided where this duct exits the rated shaft.
The response indicates an Us damper has been added to the duct as exits the rated shaft. A smoke
damper is required where it penetrates the rated corridor.
215. Fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for
fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607.
Rybka Response: Mechanical floor plan sheets, sheets M2.01.1 thru M2.11.1 have been revised to
show:
Combination fire smoke dampers (FSD) or shunt duct* on rated shaft penetrations.
FD in duct floor penetrations when no more than three floors are penetrated, and
FD on 2 hour rated wall penetrations.
* shunt ducts per NFPA 90A (2002), Figure A.5.3.
NFPA 90A is not an adopted document by the Town of Vail or referenced in the IMC. The review team
is not familiar with the term "shunt duct ". Fire smoke dampers are required at the shaft and
corridor duct penetrations. (IMC 607.5.3, 607.5.4 and 607.5.5.1)
Rybka Response: The 2006 IMC now calls the use of 22" upturned sheet metal ducts in 2 hour fire
rated risers as 'sub ducts'. The provision of the 'sub duct' is an exception to the requirement
that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided
the exhaust fan is on emergency power. The use of sub ducts on the project is shown in Details 6, 7
and 8 on Sheet M6.03.
M2.03.1 - Remove designations for shunt ducts for the ducts run in the garage exhaust shaft.
Rybka Response: EF -8, EF -43 and residential dryer exhaust have been shown terminating in a vertical
areaway (garage exhaust riser) that is always being exhausted by EF -1B on emergency power. It was
agreed during the June TOV plan review meeting that this condition is analogous to the 'sub duct'
provisions identified earlier.
The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously.
Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's.
2. In Group B and R occupancies equipped
throughout with an automatic sprinkler system
in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 of the
International Building Code, smoke dampers
are not required at penetrations of shafts where
kitchen, clothes, dryer, bathroom and toilet
room exhaust openings with steel exhaust
subducts, having a wall thickness of at least
0.019 inch (0.48 mm) extend at least 22 inches
(559 mm) vertically and the exhaust fan at the
upper terminus is powered continuously in
accordance with the provisions of Section
909.11 of the International Building Code, and
maintains airflow upward to the outdoors.
The drawings are still substantially incomplete when labeling FSD's. I will attempt to identify
some locations. It will be up to the design team to identify all locations.
Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided
where ducts exit rated shafts.
All drawings are indicting F.D. on the bathroom exhausts where penetrating the shaft. There is an
administrative modification request to eliminate dampers on the bathroom exhausts.
Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FD designations at restroom exhausts
have been deleted where 'sub-ducts' are provided per the administrative modification.
The drawings are indicating ducts from below and ducts from above. Please create a tag for
sub -ducts and clearly mark the plans on all the ducts that are to be utilizing this system.
M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C -301 that are labeled F.D. these are
required to be FSD. 2 -8x6 ducts and 1 -10x6 duct.
Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not
required.
SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4)
M2.03.1 - There are several duct penetrations in Corridor C -311 that are labeled F.D. these are
required to be FSD. 1 -8x10 duct and 1 -12x6.
Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been updated and FD designations have been deleted where not
required.
SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4)
M2.03.3 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C -301 and C -311 to FSD.
Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour
rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided.
If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the
fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required
and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers.
SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4)
M2.03.3 - All duct penetrations through the shafts are marked F.D. These are required to be FSD.
There are too many to list individually.
Rybka Response: HVAC floor plan drawings have been updated and FSD designations have been provided
where ducts penetrate rated shafts.
There are multiple places that indicate FSD's where an administrative modification has been
requested to utilize a 22" sub -duct. Please coordinate.
M2.04.1 - Change all duct penetrations servicing corridors C -401 and C -411 to FSD.
Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour
rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided.
If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the
fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required
and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers.
SD's are required for the ducts serving the rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4)
M2.04.1 - There is a 14x10 duct supplying corridor C -41 I missing a damper designation. The duct is
near A9.9 and 11/11.4.
Rybka Response: The IMC requires smoke fire dampers be installed in corridor walls that are 2 hour
rated. Where the wall is not so rated, fire dampers and smoke fire dampers have not been provided.
If the wall is not rated, why provide a higher level of protection to the HVAC penetrations of the
fire separation? HVAC sheet has been updated; FD designations have been deleted where not required
and FSD provided where HVAC ducts penetrate 2 hour rated risers.
This duct has changed size to 12x8 since last review. SD's are required for the ducts serving the
rated corridor. (IMC 607.5.3 and 607.5.4)
These are just a few of the un- complying damper designations, stopped review on this correction.
Again, fire and smoke dampers are substantially incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for
fire and smoke dampers per IMC section 607.
Reconfiguration is still necessary.
216. Ductwork, pipes and electrical are prohibited in an exit passageways unless serving the exit
passageway. It appears that above non -rated ceilings in the exit passageways the space is being
used as a plenum and contains construction elements not allowed, please address all exit
passageways.
Rybka Response: Mechanical services not associated with exit passageways have been
relocated.,
The review team's interpretation of IBC 1020.5 is that any ductwork serving an exit
passageway shall be a completely separate system from the rest of the building and separate from
all other passageways. Also, this system is required for pressurization.
1020.5 Penetrations. Penetrations into and openings through an exit passageway are prohibited
except for required exit doors, equipment and ductwork necessary for independent pressurization,
sprinkler piping, standpipes, electrical raceway for fire department communication and electrical
raceway serving the exit passageway and terminating at a steel box not exceeding 16 square inches
(0.010 m2). Such penetrations shall be protected in accordance with Section 712. There shall be no
penetrations or communicating openings, whether protected or not, between adjacent exit
passageways.
Rybka Response: It is our understanding that only portions of the building service
systems that serve the exit enclosure are allowed to penetrate the exit enclosure. We note that IBC
1019.1.3, VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURE, VENTILATION, Item .2 permits HVAC equipment (FCUs) to be located
in the exit enclosure:
10 19.1.3 Ventilation. Equipment and ductwork for exit enclosure ventilation shall ....where located
within the building, be separated from the remainder of the building, including other mechanical
equipment, with construction as required for shafts.
All ductwork serving the exit passageways shall be protected at the point of penetration of the
passageway with a fire /smoke damper. The passageway is an extension of the vertical exit enclosure
that it serves and lesser protection is not allowed. (1017.1)
Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, and have provided FSD where make -up air ductwork penetrates the exit
enclosure.
M2.03.1- There is a duct termination shown in Stair Q exit enclosure, labeled "16x12
Employee Dryer T /A ". This is not allowed in an exit enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2)
Rybka Response: Sheet M2.03.1 has been revised to show routing of dryer exhaust so that it does not
pass through Stair Q.
M2.04.1 - There is an 8x6 duct penetration within the exit passageway C -402. It is not allowed
unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization.
(IBC 1020.5)
Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted.
M2.04.1 - There is a transfer opening 24x4 within exit passageway C -402. It is not allowed unless
it is for independent pressurization; this transfer opening is not independent or for
pressurization. (IBC 1020.5)
Rybka Response: Sheet M2.04.1 has been revised and transfer openings deleted.
M2.05.3 - There is a 6" duct shown penetrating Stair N exit enclosure. Please move out of the
enclosure. (IBC 10 19.1.2)
Rybka Response: Sheet M2.05.3 has been revised and ductwork has been rerouted so as not to pass
through Stair N.
M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C -601 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5)
Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor
from the elevator lobby and maid's room.
M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C -601. It is shown using a 2
hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines
3.3/4 and A11. (IBC 1020.5)
Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that
physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate
the exit passageway.
M2.06.1 - There is a duct penetration between Exit Passageway C -601 and Stair S -601. Penetrations
are not allowed. (IBC 1019.1.2)
Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated enclosure around
this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit passageway.
M2.06.1 - The ducts serving Exit Passageway C -611 are not independent. (IBC 1020.5)
Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor
from the guest room.
M2.06.1 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C -611. It is not
allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for
pressurization. (IBC 1020.5)
Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C -611 is not deliberate
and is to be deleted.
M2.06.1 - There is an 8x6 and a 12x6 duct passing through Exit Passageway C -611. It is not allowed
unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for pressurization.
Grid lines 11/11.4 and A8.2/A9.9. (IBC 1020.5)
Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor
from the guest room.
M2.06.1 - There is a 20x10 duct shown passing through Exit Passageway C -611. It is shown using a 2
hour fire wrap where it passes through. Penetrations are not allowed wrapped or not. Grid lines
133l134.3 and BC/BD. (IBC 1020.5)
Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that
physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate
the exit passageway.
M2.06.2 - There is a 12x10 duct penetrating the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving Stair S -605. It
is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not independent or for
pressurization. (IBC 1020.5)
Rybka Response: Rybka submits that Stair S -605 is connected to exit passageway C -614. and that the
'unlabeled passageway' is rated 2 hours, this upper level of the hallway is rated to provide
separation between levels 4 and 5 and this portion of the ceiling space does connect to a rated
vertical exit enclosure, the hallway is not an exit passageway, and that 1020.5 does not apply.
M2.06.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of the unlabeled Exit Passageway serving
Stair S -605. It is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, this duct is not
independent or for pressurization. (IBC 1020.5)
Rybka Response: See previous comment.
M2.07.2 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C -717. It is not allowed unless it is
for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC
1020.5)
Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated
enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit
passageway.
M2.07.2 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C -717. It
is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for
pressurization. (IBC 1020.5)
Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the return air slot shown in Corridor C -717 are not intended to
function as returns, are to be shown 'blanked-off and are provided for aesthetic reasons only.
M2.07.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C -712. It is not allowed unless it is
for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization. (IBC
1020.5)
Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by providing a 2 hour fire rated
enclosure around this duct penetration, effectively removing the ductwork from the exit
passageway.
M2.07.3 - There are return air slots shown in the ceiling of Exit Passageway C -712. It
is not allowed unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for
pressurization. (IBC 1020.5)
Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by separating the supply of air to the corridor
from the guest room.
M2.08.1 and M2.08.3 - There are several ducts penetrating Exit Passageway C -803. It is not allowed
unless it is for independent pressurization, these ducts are not independent or for pressurization.
Penetrations are not allowed fire wrapped or not. (IBC 1020.5)
Rybka Response: Rybka submits that the construction of a 2 hour fire rated enclosure that
physically separates the duct from the exit corridor and means that the service does not penetrate
the exit passageway.
These comments are still outstanding. Tim Willings P.E. with Rybka met with the plans examiner on
8/14/07 to bring updated drawings addressing these corrections. It was advised to submit the
drawings when all other comments are addressed.
222. Please address the garage exhaust on the east side of the structure that will cause a nuisance
thru the casement windows (W 102) in rooms 5318, 6318 and 7318.
Rybka Response: Refer to sheet A2.05.2 for plan location, and sheet A0.7.2 (WI 02) for window type.
Architect to revise window to be fixed type.
HGA Response: The architectural documents have been revised to provide fixed windows at these three
locations.
The architectural drawings are indicating windows W 102. This window is casement not
fixed on sheet A0.7.2. Please coordinate.
HKS/HGS Response (7/18/07): Revised drawings indicating fixed windows at these locations are
included with this resubmittal.
Since this review, the Town of Vail has informed our review team that garage exhausts on the CO2
detectors are product- conveying outlets requiring being 10' above grade, 10' from openings into the
building and 10' from property lines. The continuous fan is considered environmental, thus allowing
3' from openings and T from property lines. Please address accordingly.
224. Please indicate how the 18" flue from the gas ironer, on the 3rd level is routed thru the
loading dock above on the 4th level.
Rybka Response: Laundry gas -fired flat ironer vent leaves the laundry room at level 3 (Sheet
M2.03.1) and runs vertically through the building in a rated chase with fire enclosed offsets
before being vented at the roof of level 11 (Sheet M2.11.1).
M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation
that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized
is listed to be wrapped with insulation.
Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2
hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap.
Provide architectural details for the shaft.
228. Specify on the plans the location of EC -1, Type I fan for the kitchen.
Rybka Response: Sheet M4.04 has been revised to show Ecology Unit EC -1 in Ecology Room M -402A.
Ecology Room M -402A as designed is a component of the grease duct enclosure. "The duct enclosure
shall serve a single grease exhaust duct system and shall not contain any other ducts, piping,
wiring or systems." Remove the other exhaust fans, ducting and electrical within the room not
associated with the Type 1 duct. (IMC 506.3.10)
Rybka Response: The 2 hour rated architectural enclosure of the Ecology unit has been reconfigured
to that only the ductwork and equipment associated with the commercial kitchen exhaust is contained
within the Ecology Room M -402A.
Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour wall and 90 minute door that is shown on
the mechanical drawings.
233. Indicate on the plans that the 36" dryer duct and the 18" flue from the Ironer are in a 2 hour
shaft on the 6th level, page M2.06.1.
Rybka Response: RYBKA concurs, the 36" dryer exhaust duct and 18" gas-fired flat ironer vent that
both run horizontally at level 6 (on sheet M2.06.1) are to be in a 2 -hr fire rated enclosure.
M2.06.1 - The flue pipe is indicating a 2 hour fire wrap through this level. Provide documentation
that the wrap is listed for flue pipes and provide documentation that the flue pipe being utilized
is listed to be wrapped with insulation. (from comment 224)
Rybka Response: M2.06.1 has been revised to indicate that horizontal vents are to be enclosed in 2
hour rated drywall enclosures and not fire wrap.
Change the architectural drawings to reflect the 2 hour shaft walls and details for construction.
Please show compliance to IBC 707.11 for the bottom of the shaft housing the 34" dryer duct.
234. Provide manufacturers instructions to verify the dryers in rooms 312 and 31 OD are capable of
exhausting the developed length shown on the plans.
Rybka Response: Residential dryer exhaust system shown on Sheet M2.03.1 serving Employee Laundry
Room 3 1 OD and Valet Room 317, with quantity five (4 +1) dryer exhaust connections to dryer exhaust
EF -43 has been rerouted. In addition to the lint filter integral to the appliance, and auxiliary
lint trap and cleanout has been shown on the common dryer exhaust duct system before the duct
leaves the Employee Laundry Room 31 OD. The entire length of the residential dryer exhaust duct is
to be fire wrapped to maintain clearances to combustibles. Discharge of laundry dryer exhaust is
routed to exterior via connection to rated garage exhaust riser. Penetration is protected by fire
wrap and minimum 22" shunt duct extended into garage exhaust riser. In addition, RYBKA have
specified a laundry exhaust booster fan EF -43 which is interlocked with dryer operation.
Dryer exhaust ducts are required to terminate to the outside the building and shall be equipped
with a back draft damper, also clothes dryer exhaust ducts shall not extend into or through ducts
or plenums. Route the dryer ducts directly to the exterior with a back draft damper. (IMC 504.4)
Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by showing the backdraft damper. The use of
upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an exception to the requirement
that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct penetrates a rated shaft, provided
the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka submits that the garage exhaust areaway,
to which this system is connected, is effectively outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures
continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min. level of garage exhaust is required by code)
and is powered from emergency circuit.
The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously.
Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's.
238. The Laundry Layout, page LA 1.2, indicates a flue pipe for the dry cleaner in room #317. Add
the flue and the 2 hour chase to the architectural sheets and to the mechanical sheets, clarify
that it does not pass through a plenum.
Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.03.1 to show dry cleaning machine exhaust fan EF -8 and
ducted connection to outdoors.
M2.03.1 - The termination is shown with a 22" sub -duct within the garage exhaust duct. This is not
to the exterior as required per IMC 502.7.3.6. The review team also is concerned that when the
garage exhaust is not operating the fumes from the dry cleaning can migrate to the garage.
Terminate the dry cleaning exhaust to the exterior.
Rybka Response: The use of upturned 22" sheet metal sub duct in 2 hour fire rated risers is an
exception to the requirement that a combination fire smoke damper be provided where this duct
penetrates a rated shaft, provided the exhaust fan is on emergency power. In this case, Rybka
submits that the garage exhaust areaway, to which this system is connected, is effectively
outdoors, since the exhaust fan which ensures continuous upward flow in the riser always runs (min.
level of garage exhaust is required by code) and is powered from emergency circuit.
The exception is for a fan to be at the top of the termination and that it runs continuously.
Neither of these has been met with the garage exhaust. These exhausts are not in Group B or R's.
244. Add a 2 hour shaft below and proper opening protection for the duct designated as 24x14 S/A
F/A -24x12 S/A TB on page M2.08.1 on grid line l0A and between 10.5/11.
Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1 and relocated the duct riser to the protected shaft
in the North West corner of the Maids Room G -811.
See comment #215, smoke /fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft.
Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by properly coordinating the duct offset/riser
transfer shown at this level with rated shaft location or rating requirements. These two ducts that
transition between shafts that are not aligned between the 8th and 9th floor levels are both to be
shown enclosed in a 2 hour rated drywall enclosure, negating the need for combination fire smoke
dampers, except where duct connections penetrate the shaft wall (one location).
The duct on this level is indicating 24x14 S /A(supply air) F /A(from above). The 9th floor level or
the enlarged M4.06 does not show this duct. Please clarify.
245. Add a 2 hour shaft or designate a fire damper for the 28x10 and the 28x14 as it passes through
a 2 hour floor /ceiling assembly into the mechanical room above. On page M2.08.1 between grid lines
10.5 /11 and A8.2/A9.9.
Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.08.1.
See comment #215, smoke /fire dampers are required where the duct penetrates a shaft.
Rybka Response: Rybka submits that ducts that rise vertically through the building that are
protected with two hour fire rated enclosures and are connected to a 2 hour rated mechanical room
at the highest level do not have a fire damper at the floor penetration of the mechanical room.
Rybka submits that the 2 hour rated shaft enclosure is an extension of the 2 hour rating of the
mechanical room fire rated enclosure.
There is a 24x10 duct shown penetrating the shaft connecting to the 28x10 duct within the shaft.
Add the S/F damper at this location. (The architectural overlays indicate a shaft too small to
house the duct ?)
There is a 24x18 duct shown in this vicinity penetrating the floor /ceiling above. Please address
with a fire damper.
246. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 8x10 duct on page
M2.07.2 between grid lines A8.2/A9.9 and 10110.5.
Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1.
The duct has not been addressed on all levels also see comment #215, smoke /fire dampers are
required where the duct penetrates a shaft.
Rybka Response: Rybka will rectify this condition by coordinating the duct riser serving the
elevator lobby for levels 7, 8, 9 and 10 and attic levels (Sheets M2.07.2, M2.08.2, M2.09.2,
M2.10.2 and M2.11.1). Rybka will show a combination fire smoke dampers at the penetration of the
riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft wall (one location each occupied floor).
The response is indicting that fire /smoke dampers will be added to the shaft, one on each level.
The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor levels. The fire damper at the
floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories. This comment stands, the
duct in question has been changed to 12x18 on the 7th level.
247. Add a 2 hour shaft and proper opening protection on all levels for the 12x6 duct on page
M2.07.1 between grid lines A6 /A7 and on grid line 4.2.
Rybka Response: RYBKA has revised sheet M2.07.1, M2.08.1, M209.1.
This duct serving the elevator lobbies has not been addressed.
Rybka Response: Rybka will coordinate the duct riser serving the elevator lobby for levels 7 in
this location with level above and below. Rybka will correct this by rerouting existing ductwork
through rated risers provided by HGA in these locations and Rybka will show a combination fire
smoke dampers at the penetration of the riser at each level where duct penetrate the shaft .
The same issue as response to #246. The response is indicting that fire /smoke dampers will be added
to the shaft, one on each level. The drawings have been changed to show fire dampers at the floor
levels. The fire damper at the floor line is only allowed if the duct connects not more than 2
stories. This comment stands. The supply duct from level 11 to 10 has no shaft, the duct runs
horizontally on the 9th level with no shaft and runs to the 7th level with fire dampers at the
floors of the 8th and 9th. This duct requires a shaft.
264. Fire dampers and rated shafts for ductwork through floor /ceiling assemblies are substantially
incomplete; evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section
607.6.
Rybka Response: Refer to response to comment 215
Here are some floor penetrations by ducts that have not been addressed, please evaluate the entire
mechanical plan for fire dampers and shafts per IMC section 607.6.
M2.03.1 - 12x20 duct, grid lines A4.6 and 2.7/3
The duct in question has changed to 20x 16. The vertical and horizontal shafts need to be shown on
the architectural sheets.
M2.03.1 - 18x14 duct, grid lines Al2 and 3.3/4
The horizontal shaft shown on M2.02.1 is not shown on the architectural sheets.
M2.04.1 - 16x10 duct, grid lines A13 and 3.3/4
This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. (IBC 707.11)
M2.04 - 12x6 duct, grid lines A10 /AI I and 10.5/11
A fire damper has been added to the 2 floors above. The fire damper at the floor line is only
allowed if the duct connects not more than 2 stories.
M2.04 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10 /AI I and 10.5/11
This duct will require a fire damper at the bottom of the shaft. The duct is connecting more than 2
stories below the shaft.
M2.04 - 6x 12 duct, grid lines A 10 and 10.5
The drawings have been changed to add fire dampers at the floor line. This duct connects more than
2 stories, a shaft is required.
M2.05 - 26x14 R/A, grid lines A6 /A7 and 5
A fire damper is required at the floor between the 5th and 6th level.
M2.05 - 12x12 paint shop exhaust, 12x12 carpenter exhaust and a 24x12 sanitary duct, grid lines
A4.6 and 4/5. These ducts traverse from what appears to be a rated shaft from below through the
Resid. Club Concierge Desk (512) room up through the ceiling with no protection.
This duct enters a shaft on this level, add a fire damper to the duct as it enters the bottom of
the shaft. (IBC 707.11)
M2.05 - 6x6, 8x6, (2)12x6 and 10x20 ducts, grid lines A10 and 10 /10.5
M2.05 - 8x6 duct, grid lines A10 and 10.5/11
Review on duct penetrations through the floors has been stopped. The plans examiner's function is
not to make a punch list for the design team. Evaluate the entire mechanical plan for fire dampers
and shafts per IMC section 607.6.
Rybka Response: Rybka submits that fire dampers, rated shafts and combination fire smoke dampers
have been added to the floor plans in general conformance with requirements of the plan reviewer.
Additional damper, combination fir dampers and shaft wall construction will be required where this
drawing revision has not correctly identified that they are required.
Any duct that penetrates more than 2 stories will require a shaft and appropriate protection
through the shaft wall. The architectural drawings are substantially incomplete indicating vertical
and horizontal shafts that match the mechanical drawings. Please coordinate the mechanical
responses on the architectural drawings.
Structural Conditions-
The conditions listed are taken from the last comment letter dated 07/18/2007. The open issues are
listed in Red.
S106 F 9,11,14/S6.01 E Sheet S2.03.2: 12 ft. cantilever retaining wall extension of
exterior two span wall below, outside of ballroom areaway on line A 11 between 14 and 14.5 has not
been checked and appears to be overstressed for flexure, please check. Consider moment resisting
joints at slab to wall connections. Design / detail planter wall. These details require rebar and
splices to be shown for proper detailing and construction. Verify cantilever deflection.
KL &A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue.
KL &A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings,
the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the
ballroom area, please review.
silo F S2.02.4 No calculations have been provided for the cantilevered retaining wall around the
pool structure, or on gridline D1. Verify lateral load capacity, consider pedestrian surcharge and
water surcharge due to site drains behind this wall as appropriate. Verify footing width.
KL &A 6/26/07: Wall in question between gridlines 6 -8.5 south of A18 supports roof loads and also
is the lateral load path for pool structure loading, and for roof uplift for partially enclosed
structures. Wall also is monolithic with Area 3A perimeter building wall. Design is part of EOR's
scope, please provide wall designs accounting for support of roof structure.
KL &A 8/31/07: Coordinate new retaining wall detail 21/S4.03 with foundations shown on plan,
S2.02.4. Verify new steel roof around pool structure will resist lateral soil reaction of 1.0 klf,
verify metal deck shear strength and connection to resisting perpendicular retaining walls.
S128 GS S2.09.3 Top slab bars l OT3 & 1 OT6 are shown at line 10.6 /A 14. It seems these bars are
shown in error as the concrete beam is upturned at this location. Beams south of line A 12.2 are not
identified. Please check. IBC 1603.1.
KL &A 6/26/07: Top bars also appear required at gridline A10. S2.09.3 PT profile is incomplete,
details are required.
KL &A 8/31/07: Top bars are still not shown on plan, please review.
S145 LS 1/53.02C Wall thickness is shown as 8 inches. Plan S201.2 indicates a 12" exterior
foundation wall, please coordinate.
KL &A 6/26/07: Coordinate reinforcing shown on shear wall elevation with 'W2' or'W3' per
S2.01.2, it is unclear which wall type controls for soil lateral loading. Wall must span two way
due to stair shaft opening, verify designs.
KL &A 8/31/07: Submitted calculations show restraint at top of planter wall, while per drawings,
the wall is cantilevered. It appears wall type'W5' is required at retaining walls south of the
ballroom area, please review.
S164 LS S2.11 Provide detail of roof diaphragm to concrete cores. Provide or indicate detail of
steel beams to concrete cores for gravity plus lateral loading, per ASCE 7 -02 load combinations.
Verify drag loads and chord force detailing at eave framing. Verify diaphragm welding is sufficient
for expected shear forces, provide shear and moment diagram at roof deck levels. ASCE 7 -02:
9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7.
KL &A 6/26/07: New detail 13 /S1.0.5B:Welded studs, thickness and dimensions of embed plate are
not defined. Please provide this information for all beams and reaction conditions on the drawings.
Verify connection is adequate with short slot or long slot holes in the shear tab, if permitted for
erection. Provide roof diaphragm calculations per original comment. IBC 1911, 1912, 2205.1.
KL &A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing.
S165 LS S2.11 Provide detail of concrete diaphragm to concrete cores, verify shear transfer at
each level and comment whether any drags are required. Verify if typical details 12 & 23/S1.0.3A
apply throughout the job. ASCE 7 -02: 9.5.2.6.2.2, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.7, 9.5.2.6.2.8.
KL &A 6/26/07: Please respond to this issue.
KL &A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing.
S169 LS S3.02A Calculations show a significant force reversal / back -stay effect from Level 6 to
Level 5 shear force, i.e. SW 14 & SW 16. Verify this load path has been designed for the loads per
3D analysis. Verify soil plus wind / seismic loading has been used for drag design. Note per plan,
S2.05.1, a large hole exists adjacent to wall SW16, and per calculations page 536, (38 +57) =95k
shear transfer is required. No drags are shown on plan. Please verify. Note, elevations S3.02A show
#5 @ 14" o.c. at upper levels, calculations shown (2) #5 @ 24" o.c., please verify designs match
calculations. IBC 1616.1.1, IBC 1604.4.
KL &A 6/26/07: Original comment calculated (38 +57) =95k load for SW14 not SW16 as noted, however
collector bars have not been added for SW 14. SW 16 collector load is (86 +143) =229k, (4) #7 shown on
plan are not adequate for 229k, please review all collector designs.
KL &A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing.
S171 S2.11.1 -2, etc. Roof framing plans are incomplete. Please address the following and confirm
detailing will be provided in future drawings issues, per.IBC 1604.2, 2205.1.
a) KL &A 8/31/07: Closed
b) KL &A 8/31/07: Closed
c) KL &A 8/31/07: Closed
d) KL &A 8/31/07: Closed
e) KL &A 8/31/07: Closed
f) KL &A 8/31/07: Closed
g) W8 & W16 eave supports do not cantilever outwards and support eave in RAM analysis submitted,
instead all load is transferred directly to columns via eave rim beam. Verify eave supports and
perimeter girders are adequately sized
KL &A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing.
h) S2.09.3, etc: HSS6x6 to W8, W14 moment connection at eave needs a detail
KL &A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing.
i) 1 /S2.10.3: W 1601 on line A 10.5 is shown as W 180 5 per calculations, please verify all beams
match calculations. IBC 2205.1.
KL &A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing.
S172 1 /S2.08.3 W 18x46 eave support girder near gridlines CB -C 1 is shown as W21 x44 per
calculations; W1400 on line BE is shown as W21 x48 per calculations. Several cantilevered eave
moment connection supports are shown without a backspan member. Please review. IBC 2205.1.
KL &A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing.
S173 1/S2.08.3 Verify lateral support of the low roof structure for wind and seismic loading; low
roof section is not connected to Level 8 PT slab beyond or core walls within the roof area, and
braced frames are not shown. Similar at 2/S2.08.3 and other low roof structures. IBC 1604.4.
KL &A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing.
S173 11,26,28/S7.01 A Calculations indicate that roof deck is attached to slab edge along line 2 and
other locations where deck and floor slab are near the same elevation. Provide a detail for lateral
roof to slab connection where required by lateral analysis. IBC 1604.4.
KL &A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing.
S174 S2.11.1, etc Show roof diaphragm to concrete core connection, consider in -plane collector
shear forces and out of plane anchorage forces. IBC 1604.8.2; ASCE 7, 9.5.2.6.2.6, 9.5.2.6.2.8.
KL &A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing.
S175 S2.11.1 Verify diaphragm continuity at dormers line A5 between upper roof deck and lower roof
deck, provide collectors as required for in plane shear and out of plane shear. IBC 1604.4.
KL &A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing.
S176 S2.09.2 Roof ridge support columns near15.5 -A4.8 shown on S2.11.2 are not supported by slab
below, please check. IBC 1604.4.
KL &A 8/31/07: Column in question is 20 feet tall, verify HSS5x5 is adequate, per S2.11.2.
S178 A2.11.1 R, etc. Structural roof plans do not incorporate snow fences shown on architectural
drawings. Please provide snow fence with adequate structural connection shear and moment associated
with sliding snow. IBC 1608.
KL &A 8/31/07: Submitted materials are incomplete, review of this item is ongoing.
KL &A 8/31/07: COMMENTS ON NEW DETAILS FOLLOW
S187 21/S4.03 Minimum depth shall be 48" for frost depth requirement. IBC 1805.2.1. Verify wall
vertical rebar is adequately developed at top of footing, ACI 318, 12.2. Appears that variables D
and D' are reversed with calculations variables hf and hp, please review. IBC 1806.
S188 S5.03 Revised beams 4138 & 4139 appear too shallow to support one way slab at ramp. Shear ties
are spaced greater than d /2. Please review beam sizes for ramp loads. IBC 1604.2.
Planning Department Conditions -
From: Warren Cambell
Submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval prior to requesting a TCO.
Public Works Conditions -
From: Chad Salli, Project Engineer
1. Install snowmelt in loading dock dwy. Sheet M5.15 not in resubmittal package, Sheet M5.14 shows
heat in the southern half of the dwy. The dwy should be heated from the back of pan along the
Frontage Rd to the trench drain.
2. The fountain entry feature shall not be public right -of -way, please remove from right -of -way.
3. The two tier retaining wall shall be designed /stamped by a Colorado registered professional
engineer, greater than 4' in height from the top of wall to the bottom of the foundation.
4. Provide Final Drainage report including hydrology and hydraulic analyses (Box culvert, Storm
pipe, inlets, swales, etc...). This shall include storm sewer profiles with HGL shown. A 100 yr
analysis shall be completed showing no private /public property damage as a result. Provide capacity
analysis for major swales and all inlets. The SCS method may be used for large mountain basins, the
Rational method shall be used for the smaller site and developed basins.
5. A Developer Improvement Agreement will be required prior to release of permit.
6. Show proposed location for Comcast fiber line along the west property line.
Frontage Road/Vail Road
1. Town of Vail Street lights shall be placed at 50' spacings along the project limits. Coordinate
with TOV electricians for electric meter location. Relocate private lighting to private property.
2. Set back (detach) the frontage rd sidewalk 6' from back of curb east of the porte cochere exit.
Sod shall be installed between the curb and walk.
3. Use attached sidewalk detail for sidewalks located within the right -of -way.
4. Use TY 13 curb inlets vs TY R where the sidewalk is attached to the curb.
5. If necessary, raise Spraddle Creek vault #I manhole to finished grade.
6. The cross -walk at the roundabout shall be asphalt thru the travel lanes and concrete only across
the median.
7. Use CDOT TY 3A curb ramps at the roundabout, 6' width at the throat.
8. Storm line A shall be at I% minimum slope. Leaving the existing proposed invert elev at TY R
inlet 3 and working upstream at I% appears to still allow for a min of 2' cover at the existing
inlet on the north side of the frontage road.
9. Sheet E1.00, please turn off extra curb &gutter alignment.
10. Install 24" conduits to medians for irrigation and 34" conduits to the west median for
future use.
Spraddle Creek Drainage
I . Per previous agreement with the Town, Four - Seasons is responsible for the construction cost of
continuing Spraddle Creek to STA 4 +40.
2. Install an impermeable membrane around the RCP /CBC due to proposed landscaping and irrigation.
3. Please provide additional detail of proposed walls along the RCP /CBC alignment. Construction of
these walls shall be designed so as not to disturb /undermine the RCP /CBC.
W Meadow Drive
1. Final approval of the West Meadow Drive construction drawings will be completed in conjunction
with the Town of Vail design. Modifications to tie -in grades on the Four Seasons site may be
necessary to accommodate this final design. W Meadow plans shall also develop streetscape related
items in the right -of -way (street lighting, landscaping, etc).
2. Storm line G alignment needs to be revised. There is not enough room to install between Spraddle
Creek and a large tree on the south side of W Meadow that shall be protected. Will finalize with W
Meadow plans.
3. Storm line E appears to in conflict with the recently installed water line. Will finalize with W
Meadow plans.
Landscaping/Irrigation
Detailed landscaping comments to follow within the next couple of weeks.
Coordinate irrigation with TOV irrigation supervisor for final head type /location and water
source.
3. The Town is currently in talks with CDOT on permissible landscaping within CDOT
right -of -way.
Fire Department Conditions -
1. LSR, MOU's and Administrative Modifications must be signed by Rybka et.al. as the Fire
Protection Engineer of record.
2. Page 14 of the LSR reference occupancy of the pre - function and ballroom is not accepted. RJA
allegedly has run calculations to show adequate exiting but such evidence has not been presented.
Appendix A - Fire Alarm Matrix is not accepted.
4. Appendix B - Small Scale Plans is not accepted.
5. MOU 5/22/07 ref Emergency Generator and Emergency Power is subject to additional review.
Cond: CON0010349
Sub -duct system for the dryers and range hoods is not approved.
************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement
************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Statement Number: R100000926 Amount: $480.00 07/26/201004:40 PM
Payment Method: Check Init: SAB
Notation: 65926 hyder
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permit No: B06 -0196 Type: NEW COMM BUILDING PERMIT
Parcel No: 2101 - 071 - 0101 -6
Site Address: 1 VAIL RD VAIL
Location: 1 VAIL ROAD
Total Fees: 177,980.15
This Payment: $480.00 Total ALL Pmts: 177,980.15
Balance: $0.00
************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Current Pmts
-------------- - - - - -- ------------------------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - --
00100003112300, GFPO PLAN CK - project GFP012 480.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
SAFEbuilti.,,.
Bnitding Deb
July 9, 2010
Martin Haeberle
Chief Building Official, Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
RE: PROJECT:
PERMIT NUMBER:
REVISION NUMBER:
INTERNAL REF #:
ADDRESS:
Dear Mr. Haeberle:
Four Seasons, Vail
B06 -0196
48 /Mechanical Revision /Bulletin # 124
11439
1 Vail Road
SAFEbuilt has reviewed the following set of documents for their conformance to the provisions of
the 2003 International Building Code, 2003 International Mechanical Code, 2003 International
Plumbing Code and 2008 National Electrical Code as adopted by the Town of Vail. SAFEbuilt finds
these documents submitted to be complete for Town approval and release for construction.
Correspondences returned to the Town of Vail:
o One set of office documents and one set of field documents labeled Bulletin #
124 containing Sheet MEP -SK -37 dated 5/20/10.
Contact us if there are any questions.
Plan review fee: 2 hours Ilf
No additional square footage- No added valuation
Sincerely,
Eric Pendley,
Certified Building Official
SAFEbuilt Colorado
eric.pendley(kSAFEbuilt.com
Page 1 of 1
SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office -' P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631
Phone: (970)328 -1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428 -6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328 -1791 ✓V:\Plan Review \Vail \4 Seasons\tov-B06-
0196 rev48_IR11439_FAL.doc
b w lo q& REVIEWED BY
fc� I
JUL 0 ?010
SAFEBuiltCq!ado Web. ww.w.
eveloomen.
r.�VfSiutl �L'CCiitttciS: �3
TRANSNAITT4i FORM
1. "Field Set" of approve plans MU, T 1
- - �:i
i � L !t _J
Fe-es for reviewing revisir-i-s an-
r- d-Ue upcii 7 ssu! n
#(s) information applies to: Attention:
eVISIOnc
6 ) ) �keswDnse to Uorrection Letter
attached copy of Gorr—ti— 1
er
Deferred -Submifftal
Other
Project St Add'
, re , , _
Y' be-n r
Cr, n r f
act In- or
T'.
Devised ADDITIONAL ValLlati(Dfl- (Labor& MateriafSl
XIC) NOT include original vatUatio,11'i
Lw I Vi &*
l 5 - 7,9i - /,S-
D
JUN 24 2010
TOWN OF
R
SAFEbuiltinc.
COLORADO
1286 Chambers Ave
Phone: 970 -328 -1790
PO Box 1618
Toll Free: 877428 -6412
Eagle, CO 81631
Fax: 970 - 328 -1791
SAFEbuiltinc.
COLORADO
1286 Chambers Ave
Phone: 970 -328 -1790
PO Box 1618
Toll Free: 877428 -6412
Eagle, CO 81631
Fax: 970 - 328 -1791
We are sending you the following item(s):
X Plans Specifications
Other
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Structural calculations Copy of letter
Description:
Two sets of plans labeled "Bulletin 124."
This package is Rev # 48 IR 11439 for mechanical revisions for presidential unit
These are transmitted as checked below:
X For Approval For Review and Comment
As Requested Returned for Corrections
Other
Resubmit
X Return
Remarks:
,&nnmvpd Rev 48 IR 11439 returned for release and construction
Copies for Approval
Corrected Prints
I2
Sent by: Charlie Davis
SAFEbuilt
..a
IWI&ng
July 9, 2010
Martin Haeberle
Chief Building Official, Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
RE: PROJECT:
PERMIT NUMBER:
REVISION NUMBER:
INTERNAL REF #:
ADDRESS:
Dear Mr. Haeberle:
Four Seasons, V
B06 -0196
47 /1-andscaping Revisions Bulletin # 122
11438
1 Vail Road
SAFEbuilt has reviewed the following set of documents for their conformance to the provisions of
the 2003 International Building Code, 2003 International Mechanical Code, 2003 International
Plumbing Code and 2008 National Electrical Code as adopted by the Town of Vail. SAFEbuilt finds
these documents submitted to be complete for Town approval and release for construction. It
appears that the landscape revisions were generated after certain site lighting changes were
performed.
The Town of Vail's Planning and Public Works Departments may be interested in reviewing these
changes. The revisions may affect their original approval for the project
Correspondences returned to the Town of Vail:
o One set of office documents and one set of field documents labeled Bulletin #
122 containing Sheets LP1.01, LP1.02, LP1.03, LS1.01, LS1.02 & LS5 01
dated 1/04/10.
Contact us iif there are any questions.
Plan review fee: 2 hours
No additional square footage- No added valuation
Sincerely,
Eric Pendley,
Certified Building Official
SAFEbuilt Colorado
eric.pendley&SAFEbuilt. com
Page 1 of 1
SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631
Phone: (970)328 -1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428 -6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328 -1791 ✓V:\Plan Review \Vail \4 Season s\tov-B06-
0196 rev47_IR11438_FAL.doc
REVIEWED BY -4
i7
114 JUil 0 �,J 20I0 _,�:
SAFENkt"7.�
n arplfes
Cr -:Ss
10 T
attached copy of correction !Etter
D-ef-erre'd SuLlTn;_sj
er
ZA 6
JUN 2 4 2010
TOWN OF VAIL
w
I
SAFEbu
COLORADO
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: 7/09/2010
1286 Chambers Ave Phone: 970 - 328 -1790
PO Box 1618 Toll Free: 877428 -6412
Eagle, CO 81631 Fax: 970 - 328 -1791
To: Town of Vail
We are sending you the following item(s):
X Plans Specifications
Other
Structural calculations Copy of letter
Description:
Three sets of plans labeled "Bulletin 122." One Office Copy, One Field Copy and One unassigned Copy
This package is Rev # 47 IR 11438 Four Seasons Resort
These are transmitted as checked below:
X For Approval For Review and Comment Resubmit Copies for Approval
As Requested Returned for Corrections X Return Corrected Prints
Other
Remarks:
Approved Rev 47 IR 11438 returned for release and construction. We recommend the Town's Planning and
Public Works Departments have a chance to review these documents as well
(, //z ;J�
Sent by: Charlie Davis
SAFEbuilt.,,
]WWI" li epartnn,
July 9, 2010
Martin Haeberle
Chief Building Official, Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
RE: PROJECT:
PERMIT NUMBER:
REVISION NUMBER:
INTERNAL REF #:
ADDRESS:
Dear Mr. Haeberle:
Four Seasons, Vail
B06 -0196
49 /Bulletin # 125 Ski Rental &Sales Office Revision
11440
1 Vail Road
SAFEbuilt has reviewed the following set of documents for their conformance to the provisions of
the 2003 International Building Code, 2003 International Mechanical Code, 2003 International
Plumbing Code and 2008 National Electrical Code as adopted by the Town of Vail. SAFEbuilt finds
these documents submitted to be complete for Town approval and release for construction.
Correspondences returned to the Town of Vail:
o One set of office documents and one set of field documents labeled Bulletin
#125 containing Sheets A2.05.2, A3.05.2, M2.05.2, M3.05.2, M2.06.1, M5.22 &
M5.22.1 dated 1/25/10.
Contact us if there are any questions.
Plan review fee: 2 hours -
No additional square footage- No added valuation
Sincerely,
Eric Pendley,
Certified Building Official
SAFEbuilt Colorado
eric. endley&SAFEbuilt.com
SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office , " P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631 Page 1 of 1
Phone: (970)328 -1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428 -6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328 -1791 ✓V:\Plan Review \Vail \4 Seasons\tov-B06-
0196 rev49 IR11440 FAL.doc
fig¢ S . v{ f�.
' .'•5h Depa timer 1:
orrrr uM Development
2 75 South Frontage Ra
Vail; Cc�lora fix..
Tel" 9
04 ;
-�� ev pmert xx
RE V'I EV V -4is'submittaEs: TRANSMITTAL FORM
1 • "Field Set" of approved plans MUST accom
pang revisions.
J - 2�g further inspections °viE( be perfom -ed until the revisions are approved & the pennit is re- issued.
3• Fees for reviewing revisions are $55.00 per hour (2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance.
P it #(s) information apples to:
Attention. _...
�� Pt visions
(} esponse to Gorrection Letter
_attached copy of correction fetter
() deferred Submittal
Other
Froj et 5tree
r✓ L
�Jes iron ! of Changes
(Number) (Street)
Building/Complex Name:
Contact Info ion. Z�I l
Company: /��• ?�to
Cem ny .Address: c� 1 d/
��- 2� /o Ch,� � ilk *74k *74k itY:
te: %ip:
Contact Name:
Contact Phone:
E -Mai! � �L!/✓ �� ��'` l 303)
A5i i
J 5
3,OS2
24e 7-
Revised DDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & !Materials) 567 Y ' w T !
(DO NOT include original valuation)
o
SuiEding:
'use addricnai sloe
r? imcing:
............. .
...........
CieCt +jai
F� t G.
::ec anical:
otai
S
Date Keceiveo:
JUN 2 4 2010 1
TOWN OF VAiL - -
OI -Tc.= i«
SAFEbuiltinc.
COLORADO
1286 Chambers Ave Phone: 970 -328 -1790
PO Box 1618 Toll Free: 877428 -6412
Eagle, CO 81631 Fax: 97 0 -328 -1791
We are sending you the following item(s):
X Plans Specifications
Other
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Structural calculations
Copy of letter
Description:
Two sets of plans labeled "Bulletin 125."
This package is Rev # 49 IR 11440 for revisions to the Ski Rental and Sales c)fFi,o
These are transmitted as checked below:
X For Approval For Review and Comment
Resubmit Copies for Approval
As Requested Returned for Corrections
X Return Corrected Prints
Other
Remarks:
Approved Rev 49 IR 11440 returned for release and construction
Sent by: Charlie Davis
Wy
REVIEWED BY
JUL 16 2010
SAFEBdt Cob1'8d0
July 16, 2010
Martin Haeberle
Chief Building Official, Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
RE: PROJECT:
PERMIT NUMBER:
REVISION NUMBER:
INTERNAL REF #:
ADDRESS:
Dear Mr. Haeberle:
SAFEbui'ltinc.
COLORADO
sniWing Department services
Four Seasons, Vail
B06 -0196
50 /Bulletin # 90R Mechanical Site Instruction
11441
1 Vail Road
SAFEbuilt has reviewed the following set of documents for their conformance to the provisions of
the 2003 International Building Code, 2003 International Mechanical Code, 2003 International
Plumbing Code and 2008 National Electrical Code as adopted by the Town of Vail. SAFEbuilt finds
these documents submitted to be complete for Town approval and release for construction.
A red -line correction has been added to each sheet identifying the requirement to add
secondary/emergency drainage to each terrace balcony. None is shown on the documents.
This requirement is supported by the 2003 International Plumbing Code, Section, 1107.1.
Correspondences returned to the Town of Vail:
o One set of office documents and one set of field documents labeled Bulletin
#90R Mechanical Site Instruction containing Sheets P2.06.2, P2.06.3, P2.07.2,
P2.07.3, P2.08.1, P2.09.1, P2.09.2 & P2.10.2 dated 12/04/09.
Contact us if there are any questions.
Plan review fee: 2 hours = $120.00
No additional square footage- No added valuation
Sincerely,
Eric Pendley,
Certified Building Official
SAFEbuilt Colorado
eric.pendleygSAFEbuilt. corn
_. 1 of 1
SAFEbuilt Colorado Eagle Office ✓ P.O. Box 1618 ✓ 1286 Chambers Avenue, Unit 101 ✓ Eagle, Colorado 81631
Phone: (970)328 -1790 ✓ Toll Free: (877) 428 -6412 ✓ Fax: (970) 328 -1791 ✓V:\Plan Review \Vail \4 Season s\tov-B06-
0196 rev50_I11I1441_FAL.doc
r ti: orltmun .y Deveioprnent
- 4 7 5 South Frontage e Raad
Mail CC�I.t3raCf{3xa8,
o.
- _, _,: •_,� _� .t •<_., ter::•
WE
DE:Y£fJ 1i16f
r
REVIEWED BY �i�1
JUL 1 6 `±�1Ofsfon submittals: �v
SAFEB t eld Set" of approved plans MUST accompany revisions.
fi[G t� BW furrier inspections will be performed (until the revisions are approved & the permit is ie- issued.
Fees for reviewing revisions arc S55.00 per lour �2 hour m- .inimurn and are due Upon issuance.
Permit #(s) information applies to:
P - bg 40
Attention:
Revisions
Response to Uorrection Letter
attached copy of correction letter
l } Deferred Submittal
(} Other
_ V
Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & rkfateriais}
(DO NOT include original valuation)
` i. m b
Mocha. icai:
TOta:
P
TOWN OF VAIL
i:SG GJ dilti-
G: SrICG; 11 -1FC ��.SGf J�
1 JUN '1Arkp10
3
SAFEbu H t i,,,.
COLORADO
1286 Chambers Ave Phone: 970 - 328 -1790
PO Box 1618 Toll Free: 877428 -6412
Eagle, CO 81631 Fax: 970 - 328 -1791
We are sending you the following item(s):
X Plans Specifications
Other
Bch - d ��4
�TEROF RANSMITTAL
Date: 7/19/2010
To: Town of Vail
Structural calculations Copy of letter
Description:
Two sets of plans labeled "Bulletin 90R."
This package is Rev # 50 IR 11441 for terrace drain revisions for the Four Seasons project
These are transmitted as checked below:
X For Approval For Review and Comment Resubmit Copies for Approval
As Requested Returned for Corrections X Return Corrected Prints
Other
Remarks:
Approved Rev 50 IR 11441 returned for release and construction
Sent by: Charlie Davis
L'