HomeMy WebLinkAboutB11-0026 . ---►
12-08-2011 Inspection Request Reporting Page 1
4:46 Dm Vail,�.p _ Citv Of
Requested Inspect Date: Friday, December 09 2011
Site Address: 1350 SANDSTONE D�t VAIL
EIGER CHALETS BLDG 1, UNIT 6
A/P/D Information
Activity: 611-0026 Type: COMBO Sub Type: AMF Status: ISSUED
Const Type: Occupancy: Use: R-2 Insp Area:
Owner: JANE BARBARA GROS REVOCABLE TRUST-
JOEL JEAN PIERRE GROS REVOCABLE
TRUST
Contractor: GROS, JOEL Phone: 970-926-5458
Architect: MICHAEL HAZARD AIA Phone: 970-949-4958
Description: ADD 2 BALCONIES, STUCCO&WINDOWS
Requested Inspectionls)
Item: 90 BLDG-Final Requested Time: 09:00 AM
Requestor: Phone:
Comments: 390-1930
Assigned To: **"**"*`•*'• Entered By: MHAEBERLE K
Action: Time Exp:
Comment: nee an rai a after first landing
Item: 290 PLMB-Final Requested Time: 04:30 PM
Requestor: Phone:
Comments: 390-1930
Assigned To: JMONDRAGON � Entered By: MHAEBERLE K
Action: Time Exp:
Comment: ammer arres ors required
�
(
v� �
�d-�
lzl �
�
�1
Inspection Historv
Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING '*Approved*"
05/26/11 Inspector: MHAEBERLE Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: OK PER LETTER FROM KRM CONSULTANTS. LETTER IN LASERFICHE.
Item: 20 BLDG-Foundation/Steel •*Approved"*
05/19/11 Inspector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: APPROVED PER SHANE ON THE OTHER PERMIT.
Item: 120 ELEC-Rough •`Approved*"
06/14/1 T Inspector: mdenney Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL
Comment: entry soffit(exterior),2nd floor deck soffit(exterior� lig h�tin .
08/02/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP A PRQVE�
Comment:
Item: 200 MECH-Rough **Approved"*
06/16/11 Inspector: mdenney Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
07/25/11 Ins ector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: BA�E BOARD HEAT 100#AIR TEST
Item: 220 PLMB-Rough/D.W.V. "'Approved*'
06/14/1 T Inspector: mdenney Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 230 PLMB-Rough/Water **Approved*"
06/14/1 T Inspector: mdenney Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 240 PLMB-Gas Piping *"Approved'*
06/14/11 lnspector: mdenney Action: AP APPROVED
, Comment:
REPT131 Run Id: 13856
K R M CONSULT �1�-°�a�°
ANTS, INC. [J70] �4J-J3J'I
P.O.Box 4572 FAX J4�-'I 577
Vail,Colorado B'I 658
RECORD
TO: Joel Gros
DATE: 5/26/2011 JOB NUMBER: 1101-11
PROJECT: Gros Remodel
❑ RFI ❑ MEET/NG NOTES � RESPONSE ❑ CLAR/F/CAT/ON/CHANGE
I was informed that the concrete footings and the grade beam were not inspected prior to pouring the
concrete. I was able to observe the footing sizes and rebar in most of the footings in the basement
and the grade beam in the back prior to pouring the concrete. The only footing that had not been
formed was the footing around the mechanical room area. However, I was able to review pictures of
this area when the footings were formed with the rebar in place, and it appears that these are
consistent with our structural drawings. Therefore, no additional investigation is required to further
examine the rebar in the footings or in the grade beam.
Please do not hesitate to call with any questions or to clarify any of these assumptions.
KRM Consultants, Inc.
P0� �tG/5�•.
S/GNED: OQ:•�'N'°••. Fy`' COPYTO:
G�:;' .
�
Tim D. Hennum, PE 34 67 :
.
�O9•OS 2� ��:�Q
, O,r•. ..•���.
REVIEWED: :'�.FS •••• • ���
S/ONA�-�- .
. -�-��
_ - , �- - � '
; � } t'�`�� ': Depaifin�nt of,Comrnun�ty:Dewelopmen� ;
� �. w z�' � �. t;= - �` ' ��,,.1 . : � - ;7�5 Suufh Frontage Road
�. ";� ,�; �.- - `� �.� � '�;
i� � �'� • ; �y ,.— _ e - � _ - Va�l,'Colarad_ci � � ' `
��=" �� _ �_ � � �y,� - � l -:��� v�. _ �eI`�9��=���-�-�
�,,�.�,� . � *�. � '/�....ir _ Y 3,� : z��(;,�.,^ �,�}�:�r�
,z�'���-�-"'2�'--���"1".,��i $. . r �'o�`k . .. � ..?'� 1-� .E�� C"�A���-�#'-�'�L���
., t� i -:�Y ,�... °� _ .-.r �- �`.' l-_t�":.�'"r-..yF��s'��` ,�' "
S_,� ���.� . 't ��� .__ -- <> �. �j��11l�b; ���a���.�� ;�
� u,..��-_ <� ���.`�-,�,��� `° �",- __ _ � D�v.e.�.a�Enen�������°-a���i-t���:
�- .. � .�-�rti��-� ��<. . � � r . �. �„ }. ��----�+>-�_�e �"`3 r,�"' �3„5."�'�
�` �'�"�t��"�{�+$-41- �" � �"'" ' '_!n� " _�+�y�, .' "^v"s.�a�'s•-'+�..h�-�.j � .3"• l�_ .s�'i1`L 3 i`�>
'�-P yµjxi s ��'t'.-,£ '+c`n��- T�y.�� �'56.,,.y�alidl � „-�'r -'�rr"' ,�1.ce�..7
"c�_Z}��r i�____'_�.�c- ._2� : �_ .,. .. ,.
TRANSMITTAL FORM
Revision Submiitals=
1. "Field SeY' of approved plans MUST accompany revisions.
2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved&the permit is re-issued. �
3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55_00 per hour(2 hour minimum),and are due upon issuance.
`,Permit#(s)information appfies to: Attention: O Revisions II
( } Response to�Correction Letter
�; 2� — Q D� � �i L i� p ��C attac�ted copy of correction ietter
d � �— ( ) Deferred Subm�ttal ,
� ( } Ofher ,
i
;
f ,.._-.�.�,..._.,-.--..- -
; Project Street Address_
;I 1 .� C y# /,� � Description/List of Changes: i
1A iJf�c.'�tZ nl� �Q.1V E �✓ ;
�(N umber) (Street) (Suite#) ;�}•1 E-FTS � � �
. ;
j Bui(d�ng/Compiex Name: ��r� k�A l..,�j i
� ' �
' e
Contact lnformation_
'.Company: �OE.L R65 — Du3lU�2. {
;
�Company Address �
Ciy: State: Zip: �
'Contact Name: °-
- �
;Contact Phone_ �
�
` E-Mail
4
_.-�...^...........-....,-...._. ' " - ' ___�...�.�.+-....-..- ' _ ____ —E
I
� Revised ADDITIONAL Vafuations{Labor�Materia(s) €
�'(d0 NOT include original va(uafion)
�
� �
': BUilding: $ �(use additional sheet ii necessary) '
i---- - ----------.._..----._._...._.__...----.._ ---..i
i
! Plumbing: $ f —
i Date Received: � � � a � (�
, Electricai: $ , D �
;
;Mechanical: $ ' MAY 19 2011
� ,
,
I Total: � 4 '
; TOWN OF V'AIL
May18-201103;06 PM Gound Englneering 9705240721 1I1
l3��-�o a,Cp
�ROU��
ENGINEERING CONSULTRNTS
May 13, 2011
Job Name: Special Inspection Services, Gros
Renovation, Vail, Colorado
Job Numbor: 11-6524
Mr. Joel Gros
Gros Constructian
P.O. Box 42
Wolcott, CO 61655
Attn: Mr, Gros,
A� reque�ted, a repressntative of GROUND visited the project to provlde special inspection
servicea. Wa obeeNed drllled holes into the existing concrete foundatlon walls for the footing
and foundation wa11 additlons in the basement and mein floor. Great Dlvide Construction utilized
a can of compressed elr to clean and dry the holes. We observed the holes for specified depth,
diameter, and cleenllness, Where speclfled, Great Divide Constructlon utlllzed Slmpaon SET-
PA EZ Epoxy Based Anchorine Adheslve to epoxy #6 reinforcing dowels into the drilled holes.
We observed excess epoxy coming out of the d�illed holes as the dowela were placed. Where
specified, Great Divide Constructlon utlllzed a 10-Ib sledge hammer to drive the #5 r�inforcinA
dowels into the drilled holes. Based on our observatione, the dowelg appeared have been
constructed in general compllance with the project plans eite specificatlons.
Webb with Great Divide Canstruction was notifled of today's observations.
Sincerely,
GROU D Engln�sring�onsultants� Inc.
i
� N I ��� �Ctc,h'�� G'�T
Field Representative �// � ��
Grend Junctlon prtco Corporate Office Oypaum OfTMe
1008 31°Ave$uke D 41 Invemess Dr East P.O,Box 4e4
Greod Junction,CO 81601 Englewood,CO 90112 Oyp9um,CO 81837
Tel:(870)242 4900 Tsl:(303)289 1888 Tel;(870)�24 0720
Fax:(970)624 0721 Fac:(3Q3)289 9742 Fax:(970)524 0721
Job Name: �P�S E�oY►R t,� '
}� Job Address:I�S�Q_ S�xM��� avc� n�c1_ '
���F�� , Permit No.:
SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT
(To applicants of projects requiring Special Inspection or Testing per Section 1701 of the IBC)
The owner or his/her representative, on the advice of the design professional in responsible charge, shall
complete, seal, sign and submit a copy of the Special Inspection Agreement and Structural Tests
Scheduled to the Town of Vail for review and approval. Signatures are required on both pages;
photocopied or faxed signatures are acceptable.
The owner and his/her general contractor, where applicable, shall also acknowledge the following
conditions applicable to Special Inspection Testing:
1. Contractor is responsible for proper notification to the Inspection or Testing agency for items
listed.(Page 1) (IBC 1704)
2. Only the testing laboratory should take samples and transport them to their laboratory.
3. Copies of all laboratory reports and inspections are to be sent directly to the Town of Vail by the Testing
agency on a weekly basis.
4. Inspection agency to submit names and qualifications of on-site special inspectors to the Town of Vail
for review and approval.( Page 2)
5. The special inspector is responsible to immediately notify the Town of Vail Building Official in writing of
any concerns and/or problems encountered.
6. It is the responsibility of the contractor to review the Town of Vail approved plans for additional
inspection or testing requirements that may be noted. A pre-construction conference at the job site is
recommended to review special inspection procedures.
7. The special inspector shall use only the Town of Vail approved drawings.
8. All special inspection field reports must be left on site for review by the Town of Vail staff prior to
required inspections or re-inspections.
BEFORE OCCUPANCY WILL BE GRANTED: The special inspection agency shall submit a signed and
sealed statement that all items requiring testing and inspection were fulfilled and reported. Those items not
tested and/or inspected shall be noted in this statement. A copy of the statement shall be maintained at the
job site for the Building Inspector's review prior to final inspection.
Acknowledge ent:
Owner. U-e � � ' - �-C��C�. �,� � S G�t /��! t(
Si nat e Print Name Date
Speciallns tion4 / i'
Agency: '� G �' �f�c�v�l �
ture Print Nam Date
Project �� l���U� O r, (
Arch/Eng:
Signat re Print Name Date
� f�
Contractor: 0--t'� � �C���L ��S 4 �6 1
Sig at re � Print Name Date
-3-
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
,,.
��o��r�.°
I Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road,Vail, Colorado 81657
p. 970.4792139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149
COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Permit #: B11-0026
Project #: PRJ10-0499
Job Address: 1350 SANDSTONE DR VAIL Applied.....: 03/16/2011
Location......: EIGER CHALETS BLDG 1, UNIT 6 Issued.. . : 04/21/2011
Parcel No....: 210312103006
OWNER JANE BARBARA GROS REVOCABLE 03/16/2011
PO BOX 2796
VAIL
CO 81658
CONTRACTOR GROS,JOEL 03/16/2011 Phone: 970-926-5458
1350 SANDSTONE DR.#6
VAIL
CO 81657
License:500-L
ARCHITECT MICHAEL HAZARD AIA 03/18/2011 Phone: 970-949-4958
P.O. BOX 1068
VAI�
CO 81658
License:C000001400
Description:
ADD 2 BALCONIES,STUCCO&WINDOWS
Occupancy: R-2 Type Construction: VA Valuation: $140,000.00
,.........�.............................,,,,...,,,,,�......,,,,.,............,...,...,. FEE SUMMARY ..�.,,,,..,.........,zx..............>..,.................,,,.,.,x...,..,,,.,.......
Building Permit-----------> $1,217.75 Bldg Plan Check----------> $791.54 Use Tax Fee-----------------------> $2,600.00
Electrical Permit---------> $264.50 Elec Plan Check-----------> $171.93 Restuarant Plan Review--------> $0.00
Mechanical Permit------> $60.00 Mech Plan Check---------> $15.00 Additional Fees--------------------> $527.64
Plumbing Permit--------> $225.00 Plmb Plan Check---------> $56.25 Recreation Fee--------------------> $20.70
Investigation-----------------------> $0.00
Will Call------------------------------> $20.00
TOTAL PERMIT FEES-------------> $5,970.31
Payments------------------------------> $5,970.31
BALANCE DUE-----------------------> $0.00
,.,.,..,,................<.......+..............,,..�...........,,._.....+.x.....,.,......,,,........,,.,.......,,.,,.,x,...,,,.....,,........,,,....,..,,,.....«......................,..
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out in fuli the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,and state that all the information
as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws,and to build this structure
according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes,design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town
applicable thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM
8:00 AM-4:00 PM.
� ^ l �
_ ' �`.;-� .;71 C� -a Z 1
Signature of Owner or Contractor ate
�f�r.7C G��Y��
Print Name
combination permit_012811
�
z
�
t V�I�V Vr Y� ;
................................................x...�....,...........,,....,.,.,,..............,..,.,,.,.,........,,.....,..........,...........,..<...,..,....,.....................
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF
Permit#: 611-0026 Address: 1350 SANDSTONE DR VAIL
Owner: JANE BARBARA GROS REVOCABLE TRUST-JOEL JEAN PIERRE GROS REVOCABLE TRUST
Location: EIGER CHALETS BLDG 1, UNIT 6
..�.......,,.............................>...,...,,...,.,...,.,,.,.......,........�...,..............,....,,..�x,......>......,..,.....,.....,,..,,,..,>...........,................,.,,.
combination permit_012811
�
. �
!�t11�V� 1�,� .
*************«***�**�********«****�*******«*******«***********************************«************«******„*,,,,*****..��*********«*****,...�**.,*******„
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES
Permit#: B11-0026 Address: 1350 SANDSTONE DR VAIL
Owner: JANE BARBARA GROS REVOCABLE TRUST-JOEL JEAN PIERRE GROS REVOCABLE TRUST
Location: EIGER CHALETS BLDG 1, UNIT 6
„*****«***********«*******«******«**««***.,***„******„*****„****,.*.x**,.�*.**.*****.,.,*****.,***********„*******.,******.*.********.,***.***********«****�*
Item: 00010 BLDG-FOOTING
Item: 00020 BLDG-Foundation/Steel
Item: 00210 PLMB-Underground
Item: 00110 ELEC-Service
Item: 00120 ELEC-Rough
Item: 00200 MECH-Rough
Item: 00220 PLMB-Rough/D.W.V.
Item: 00230 PLMB-Rough/Water
Item: 00240 PLMB-Gas Piping
Item: 00030 BLDG-Framing
Item: 00050 BLDG-insulation
Item: 00060 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail
Item: 00290 PLMB-Final
Item: 00390 MECH-Final
Item: 00190 ELEC-Final
Item: 00534 PLAN - FINAL C/O
Item: 00090 BLDG-Final
combination permit_012811
*************+****************************************�************++***************+*******
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement
*********************************************************************+********�****�*******�
Statement Number: R110000331 Amount: $5, 051.37 04/21/201112 :47 PM
Payment Method: Check Init: SAB
Notation: 7186 - jane or
joel gros
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permit No: B11-0026 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT
Parcel No: 2103-121-0300-6
Site Address: 1350 SANDSTONE DR VAIL
Location: EIGER CHALETS BLDG 1, UNIT 6
Total Fees: $5, 970.31
This Payment: $5, 051.37 Total ALL Pmts: $5, 970.31
Balance: $0.00
*********************************+********************************************++************
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Current Pmts
-------------------- ------------------------------ ------------
BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 1,217.75
EP 00100003111100 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 264 .50
I MP 00100003111100 MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES 60.00
PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 643 .42
PP 00100003111100 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES 225.00
RF 11100003112700 RECREATION FEES 20.70
UT 11000003106000 USE TAX 4°s 2, 600.00
WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 20. 00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--�--
�__ _____._�.._..--------_____—._ --
� �.
i , ;
.
: ,Job N:,r�it.� �`P�:,� ����c-�,r,�'i� ;
� _ -'"'�---
j, �� / � J
-- � Jc'.; F,c�r`ss i 3.tiJ�r,,:�.(-z1'�tz_.c__1_._�—
mr•Y� r n rA j-r ' / ��� ,t�/�
�l%�`�' �f �'����� i Pe?�r-r�: �'vo. --._�l�_—Le!V--�
I
SPECIA�. INSPECTIQN AND TESTiNG AGREEMENT
(To apptfcants af prajects requiring Spe��al Inspection or Testing per Section 1703 of the ISC}
The owr!er cr his/her represenfat�vE, on fhe adv�ce of the design �,rotessiondl in resp��s�b�e charge, si�a'I
c�r�pEe��, seal, sign anc submi; a capy o� tne Specia; Ins�ectier� AgrA;.rrent �nd StrUGtU>'d) �es!s
Schedulc:d to :n� Towr. of Vail for revi�w arc� a�proval. Sig�atureE ara requ�reti cn both po5c:;;
�7f�OtOCOpI@C 0!'f^p�C2C 51��8:ures are acccotab!e
�fic: otivi-�ci o;-��1 1-�i�lhi<:i yc;.c:a, ���-,trcCt;::, wl�i�ic avNlic:.Li�:. s}�dll �f5v �:i:..kt ovvledge th� fol�cwing
cor.d t.i::,r�s ac�plicab�e to S�E�c.ial ;n�paction ;est�n�.
1 . Ce��iraLto� is responsi��la fo� prooer notiii�ativrti to Lh� �nspection c~ Tes',ing aGency fo° items
i�s�ec.�,Pag� �} �isc �,�ca�
Z. Only>,he t�stin_c, 'a^orator,t 5hou d tal;e s��m�ies anc� t;an5port them to :heir labora±ory.
3. Copies o`a,l I�ba��tcry repcf:s and r.spe�t;ons a,e to be senf dir�:ct�y to khe Te�vn af Vail by the 1 estiny
�gen::y on a we�>Kly '�,asis. .
�1. in:�pc>,c'�on agen�y to submi- r�a�res and Guaiificat�or�s cf on-sita soc�c;a inspectors to th� To��n of Vs�I
�or r�vie�r: �'id �pprovGl ( Page ?)
5 T",� sp�clal i��SNecior is res�o�-�s��!e tc� i-?-�rr�ec�ate''y notify the Tc�wn c#Vail Buii��ng Official ir wri,i;�g 1f
..:�,y conce�n5 �n�il:�, �tv�ianfs rii�v.n;CYi��1.
5. I' is t`�c res�crsi�il;:y of t'�e cont�actor '.o revi�w the To�vn of Va:l ap�rov�d plans fo� .�dc:tiora:
inspec'icn or '.esting requireme.nts t7at r�ay be noted, A pr�-constructio� cor�`er�nce at t�e job sita is
recarrmeneed to r�;vi�;;v special inspGt:tio^ ��o�edur�5.
7. The sp�c;al inspector shail :�se only the Town of Vai! apprcv�d dr�wings.
� aii �nFCia, irsf�PC:ti{�n ;ield r�:ports rnust �e left or, site for revi�w by �he Town Qf Vail staf; ��ior to
reutzir�d ir�spec:io�zs ar ra-inspections.
ecror:� oceurr,t�dCY JVlLL B� G�;/�hTED: Thc epecial inepec:ipn �genc}� snali submit a signed and
sealed statcm�er�t that �JI iterr�s requiring testing �snd inspec':ic^ we�e fulfilizd ant� repor`ed. Tnose �tems no'.
t�sted andlor inspected shall b� noted in this statem�nt. A copy of the s'.a`.ement shall be maintainc-u at t"te
job site fo' :re Bui';dmg Ins�ector's review �'ior to 1;r,2� ;nspectlon.
Acicno:rvicd�em'�n; � ,
';,_ � � � �" ���,�L' � � P� G� y� �ft_�!� I l f
J vr�.2 r. �, C,--f�- �� - 1 �
'�� Siq.nd Ure ``' Pnni �.an��e t�ate
J
Spe�ial irspcction � ' �"" � �+ ,}{•/� � �
� 1r+���/�" �M I Y �(`-+r.� �� �
A`�°`��Y ----.._.._ _.._.. _--.....
—"` �,..,'" *.u2 �ri^, NamC� �a:e
y r ��
/�rc1CCt ,y !
�f�hlEng: '- /_) �,--1._. _.,,__ --- -t t n.t l'��J'`3Y'JUt1�. �`_��r/� l
cic.,.�.. P!in;Ncme . �aie
:
I ° �
t� � �� � r
, _t��.-� � r��_. � . __-- =-���-�/�
�_f ;� � J,� ,� .
c;:�,,<<a�.�-� _______ __^
� Si,r.a : _ F.i. �N�mE DatC
i I
--3-
_ , _. ._. �__ T ._ - __
- ��. . ., _ .
- - - _ - � .�
- _ - - _ - � _ -
�` � '�� _� :; ` . _ Departrner�t of,Cornmunity=:Developmen�
� ��;�- -��� t }'� , ' - ;75 S�uth Frontage j
EZoad
� �` '- �, :
r �, � � ' . C ora S�S���
� _� r
�
. �� _ ., � - Va �
_ .
,� x �� �� �4
� Y _�,�~�,' "` - ' < .�, ° � �- � �et a�9�0 ��-,�y -��
> � = : � , :;,. <., ' } ,s' ..,��r ' �� ��
' -S � ..,�� _^.. ':_ . . .� � 'r . .Y�.'Y �'L - �7 7 _
,-�: ' .�.:.. .: '. " � i
"�� �r� � � Faic��- �Q-�� `°2
f [�
.��� � y� -�� ti� 4+-- � •�
�3 '.� - ..J° 3 }
° ��� � � � W eb> ���a�l�a��
� � f: i'�'.< � -a' . w.r� .r 's�-��y C� �-F�s�- t:
� _� ��s »>-�. z - ` � Dsyelo�n'ten���t�'�����t��r�i��;�
��,�#�- �._ . ��,-�- �- L' � -x �-3� = �. ::� �-�-`� :�- �-���.,
��j �i� .�>�, " �� 1� `''>�rar�����q��.-,f+�y�.."i'' ' �y •�' �,. -�. ,��'�.�� �..�-,�?-s`�'�
��
TRANSMITTAL FORM
Revision Submittals:
1. "Field SeY'of approved plans MUST accompany revisions_
2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved c�the permit is re-issued.
3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55.00 per hour(2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance.
;Permit#(s)informa5on applies to: Attention: ( ) evisions ;
(�esponse to�Correction etter
�attached copy of corre�;tion tetter ;
i ( ) Deferred Submittai , �
; �� 1'Q�a.�e O Other `
' II ;
;Project Street Address: � _
' ���",� �` � � Description/List of Changes: '
i-�'—�— �l�o�%'� � i , '
;(Number) (Street) , (Suite#) f �u2 sEtS �
����TT'%G �Y�l�l� � ,
�Building/Compiex Name: , f
;
f �
,
�Contact Information: � � � }
� :
�Company_ f �
s
!Company Address: G
€ U
;City: State: Zip: ; � !'�—�a'� `
� I
;Contact Name: � �
i � � ;
;Contact Phone: �
�E-Mail �
i f
I � ;
i.._._...._..�._.._....w... -�- -- - - —;
�Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor&.Materials) � '
i(DO NOT include original valuation) � '•
i ;
i � '
` Building: � ;(use additional sheet if necessary) i
� ---- — —---------___ �
—,__......_-------._.__._.,
;Plumbing: $ , � � � � �
; f Date Received:
; Electncal: $ E
;Mechanical: $ ; APR 0 7 2011 I
�i Total: � �
� , T0�1lN OF VAI
�
�
__ . �
.
T�WN OF YA�, �
Department of Community Development
5 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2142 �'
mhaeberleC�3vailgov.com , -'��
www.vailgov.com j� �
,
,-,�;� -,�-
Date: 3/28/2011 ,
���, , , \.
� ;�S�'<<
Re: Plan review comments for 1350 Sandstone Drive Unit 6. - <'� A R` �
Activity number B11-0026
Dear Mr. Gros
GENERAL COMMENTS
• Submit four complete sets of revised construction documents containing the requested
information with all plan revision items clouded or otherwise identified.
• Please respond in writing to each comment with a response letter addressing each
comment.
BUILDING COMMENTS
Architectural Comments�
Sheet A1.0
1. Annotate on plans the building codes that apply to this proposed work.
2. Indicate on plans the occupancy classification and building type. Assuming R3 and VB
So noted on Site Plan Sheet
Sheet A2.1
1. Annotate on plans the fire rating of the property line wall. So Noted
2. The proposed addition does not comply for fire rating, opening protection, and proximity to
property line for openings as specified by Table 302.1 IRC. Revise all applicable sheets to
show code compliance. Upon further review there exists a property line wall between this
and the adjoining residence that extends the full height of the structure to the parapet wall.
Revisions to the drawings indicate that this wall will receive a new 1 hour fire resistive
sheathing and 3 coat cementitious cladding to match.
Sheet A2.2
1. Show on site plan revised drainage plan and termination point. Indicate location of
discharge. Reference section 1111.1 IPC. Please see sheet A 1 .0 where the alignment of the
proposed perimeter drain is indicated. Exact location will be field verified.
Sheet A3.1
1. The proposed drainage away from the building conflicts between details on this sheet.
Revise plans. The plans have been revised to coordinate with the placement and proximity of
the drain to the proposed foundations. The property line wall that exists has been properly
shown on the elevation sheets.
Structural Comments
Sheet S1
1. Indicate on plans how the integrity of the existing foundation is to be achieved during over
excavation.
2. Clarify inspection method for driven dowels
Plumbinq Comments�
Sheet A2.2
1. Annotate on plans the minimum vent and drain sizes at existing/ new work connections
2. Show the required floor drain for the mechanical room.
Mechanical Comments�
Sheet M2.0
1. Annotate on plans the combustion air shall be a minimum of 5 feet above grade per Town
of Vail amendments.
Electrical Comments�
Sheet E1.1
1. Plans are missing required switches of lighting. Reference article 210.70 NEC
2. Provide service location. Reference submittal requirements
3 Show all gfci locations. Reference article 210.8 NEC
4. Provide co and smoke detector locations
5. Show receptacle spacing per Article 250.25 NEC
All corrections so indicated on revised drawings.
PLANNING COMMENTS
Reviewed and accepted
FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Reviewed and accepted
PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS
NA
Sincerely,
Martin A Haeberle, CBO
Chief Building Official
Town of Vail �
KR M CONSULTANTS, INC. (J70) J49-J3�'I
P.O.Box 4572 FAX J4J-'I 577
Vail,Colorado 8'I 65B
RECORD
TO: Martin Haeberle
Town of Vail
DATE: 4/5/2011 JOB NUMBER: 1101-11
PROJECT: Gros Remodel
❑ RFI ❑ MEETING NOTES � RESPONSE ❑ CLARIFICATION/CHANGE
The following is in response to the Building DepartmenYs Structural Comments dated 3/28/11 (BP11-0026):
Sheet S1:
1. A note was added to the foundation plan indicating the need for a site visit to observe the grade behind
the drywall upon demolition. The existing grade is already cut vertically below the existing footing, so soil
removal could be very minimal. Otherwise, we will have the foundation wall excavated and poured in two
phases.
2. The inspection method for the driven dowels is noted at the beginning of the General Notes.
Please call with any questions.
KRM Consultants, Inc.
�,��`P���r��sT ,
.�\�,�.HEN,LG�F��.
t � '.
SIGNED: • 349 67 � COPY TO:
a
0
0
s
e �ti°
Tim D. Henn m, P �`�•, .�_`
, a��p ,,`\,..
�; ,. �� ((
REVIEWED:
� i
!
.. _-... r � .
���� 1�� ��....
Department of Community Development
5 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657 F(3j
970-479-2142 0�,• - �' .�A�
mhaeberle@vailgov.com V0� ��'�Q
� �.
www.vailgov.com � ;
: � :
�
.
Date: 3/28/2011 �'••.� �,,C�•
��oi'v�.�
Re: Plan review comments for 1350 Sandstone Drive Unit 6.
Activity number B11-0026
Dear Mr. Gros
GENERAL COMMENTS
• Submit four complete sets of revised construction documents containing the requested
information with ali plan revision items clouded or otherwise identified.
• Please respond in writing to each comment with a response letter addressing each
comment.
BUILDING COMMENTS
Architectural Comments:
Sheet A1.0
1. Annotate on plans the building codes that apply to this proposed work.
2. Indicate on plans the occupancy classification and building type. Assuming R3 and VB
Sheet A2.1
1. Annotate on plans the fire rating of the property line wall.
2. The proposed addition does not comply for fire rating, opening protection, and proximity to
property line for openings as specified by Table 302.1 IRC. Revise all applicable sheets to
show code compliance.
Sheet A2.2
1. Show on site plan revised drainage plan and termination point. Indicate location of
discharge. Reference section 1111.1 IPC.
Sheet A3.1
1. The proposed drainage away from the building conflicts between details on this sheet.
Revise plans
_ , �
Structural Comments
Sheet S1
1. Indicate on plans how the integrity of the existing foundation is to be achieved during over
excavation.
2. Clarify inspection method for driven dowels
Plumbinq Comments:
Sheet A2.2
1. Annotate on plans the minimum vent and drain sizes at existing/ new work connections
2. Show the required floor drain for the mechanical room.
RADER RESPONSE: See new drawing P2.0. Note that there is an existing floar drain
in the mechanica! room.
Mechanical Comments:
Sheet M2.0
1. Annotate on plans the combustion air shall be a minimum of 5 feet above grade per Town
of Vail amendments.
RADER RESPONSE: Note has been added. See clouded changes on sheet M2.0.
Electrical Comments:
Sheet E1.1
1. Plans are missing required switches of lighting. Reference article 210.70 NEC
2. Provide service location. Reference submittal requirements
3 Show all gfci locations. Reference article 210.8 NEC
4. Provide co and smoke detector locations
5. Show receptacle spacing per Article 250.25 NEC
PLANNING COMMENTS
Reviewed and accepted
FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Reviewed and accepted
PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS
NA
Sincerely,
Martin A Haeberle, CBO
Chief Building Official
Town of Vail
� �
� ,� r._s �� . .:� �. . ..
����. �: � �� ��'• � '1 �' � � ��
,�. �# �; ' , Department of Community Developitient��'
` 75 South Frontage Ro�ci
� � � �� �, ` . � � �'s � `'�tf � �� = �
r� �a ,� �, � r � Va�l, C:olorac�o ���5�;':
�3� y 9 � 'F
^°� *- � '"��� �;'� � � ,- � � ��`"�Tet 97 7 " �
� � ..a R ��i� �� yl
.L � '� ' '� '' �,,, � »��' � a- � = 3�� �Y» F1�,��7Q���,,��,�`�p
�� �� ,��;;w� ._ , �,�` �_` �Mi � t- .{'�. t; �...,� e
.� � . .,` �,, �s�.� YYe� �inr va�l�o�d- .
�;�f?t���':�'�� �..� � '.: . ~
.
, _ :
F "
��=��.�.�. _ __,�-... _. . �� �. � Deve�o}�mentaR�vrevy ��or�#t�77gyy �
-�� ......' -F6.,� .$' �y �.f'- � �,. �` � ���%���
T � � .-��_.�.v.����� �
RANSMITTAL FORM
Revision Submittals:
1. "Field$et"of approved plans MUST accompany revisions.
2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved&the permit is re-issued.
3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55.00 per hour(2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance.
------_.---____.�_____
�Permit#(s)information applies to: ���� � `�----~
E Attention: ( ) Revisions �
f ��� �C��Zt� �
j O Response to Correction Letter `
i
€ attached copy of correction letter J
( ) Deferred Submittal �
� (�Other .
.,.,.�.���..,..._.....,._.�,.. �
�Project Street Address: � .,�„ i
� l S� �� 1 S ��^�� � �'�Q Description/List of Changes: ��� '
i(Number) (Street) --- ,
(Suite#) _� � � �, ��� _
�Building/Complex Name: � �` � �2�' � C�
� !
�� ,, �
�Contact Information: ��� ������'�` 1 � `-`�— � � 6�(� � �-
�Company:
l
�'�C. C C (_.�S—p�—� (�2J�(��-'���,c�
Company Address: � n���� �, �� � �
City: �
State: Zip: Q-✓- � re �� �
� �
�Contact Name: r--Cs�-����� (� �
�-�'r''� i
�Contad Phone: �� ]
�
E-Mail C� �� _ S(J� 3
� C 1
�--.�.......n...,_� �
( ----.�...�.......�.��.,..,�., ,
�Valuations(Labor 8�Material)) � £
f � i
�Building: � � 3� ��� j !
� �
�`Plumbing: � �
(use additional sheet if necessary) �
� ___
__.. _. . �
Electrical: -----
_._ _.
_.�
-._.__..
�Mechanical: f Date Received: . �
$ ;
i Total: � .��� �•� $ ��'�� d�C� ,
f ��.,._r� �
-- --- D
�- --- -----___�._ _____ __ ,_____ , _. __�.__ __ ---_.___ __._________ __ � � � � M C
MAR 18 2011
,
TOWN OF VAIL ��
1-Sep-09
f `a •
HHepwurth-Pawlak Geoteclulical,Inc.
���� 5020 County Road 154 �
� Glenwood Springs,Colorado 81601
Phone:970-945-7988
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
���.,�:970-945-8454
November 12, 2010 ����,������: hr�e„�a,l,�,�E.,r�-��, �,,�„
Joel and Jane Gros
P.O. Box 2796
Vail, Colorado 81658
Job No. 410 196A
Subject: Observation of Exploratory Pits, Proposed Remodel, Eiger Chalet, Unit 6,
1350 Sandstone Drive, Vail, Colorado
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gros:
As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed
exploratory pits excavated at the subject site on November 10, 2010 to evaluate the soils
exposed for foundation support. The fmdings of our observations and recommendations
for the foundation design are presented in this report. The services were performed in
accordance with our agreement for professional engineering services to Joel and Jane
Gros, dated November 8; 2010.
Existing Building Conditions: The existing building consists of a two story, wood
frame structure over a walkout lower level originally built around 1970. The upper level
cantilevers out 28 inches from the middle leveL It appears that the north part of the lower
level had been converted to a finished basement area during a previous remodel and steps
up about 18 inches above the remaining lower floor level. The north foundation wall
appears to be of"board form" construction and may be wall-on-grade bearing. The
existing floor in the north part had been removed.
A hot tub is located adjacent to the north foundation wall, at the exterior side. A boulder
wall retains the cut at the north side of a small level area at the north side of the building.
Proposed Construction: The proposed remodel of the subject site will include new
foundations to support additions on the east and north sides of Unit 6. Two "Big Foot"
footing pads are proposed to support a new elevated wood deck at the southeast side of
the building. The middle living level is proposed to be extended north, in line with the
upper level, and a new continuous footing and stem wall (frost depth) is proposed to
support the building extension. We understand that helical piers are being considered for
support of the north building extension in order to reduce the amount of excavation and
site disturbance required to construct a spread footing foundation.
Field Observations: At the time of our visit to the site, remodel work was in progress
and an exploratory pit had been excavated by hand just offof the southeast corner of the
building in a gravel parking area adjacent to the building. The soils exposed in the pit,
below a thin layer of crushed rock, consisted of 1 foot of organic topsoil overlying
medium dense, silty to clayey sandy gavel with cobbles down to the bottom pit depth of
Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 97C�-468-19�9
� - Joel and Jane Gros
November 12, 2010
Page 2
4 feet. In addition to that pit, we hand excavated a small pit at the toe of the steep cut
slope northeast of the parking area to augment our evaluation of the natural soil
conditions at the subject site. The soils exposed in the additional pit, below a shallow
depth of topsoil, consisted of granular soils similar to those observed in the first pit
excavated at the site. The results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of the
natural granular soils (minus 6 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on
Figure 1. No free water was encountered in the pits and the soils were generally moist.
We did not observe any foundation distress at the time of our site visit and we understand
that the building structure was in relatively good condition, considering its age, prior to
beginning the remodel. The soils exposed below the foundation in the north part of the
lower level were observed to be predominantly granular and relatively dry.
Conclusions and Recommendations: Considering the conditions exposed in the pits,
the existing bearing conditions exposed and the nature of the proposed construction,
spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soil designed for an allowable
soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf can be used for support of the proposed footings. The
exposed soils could tend to compress under load and result in some post-construction
settlement between the new footings and the existing foundation, possibly up to about 1
inch.
Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for
columns. Loose and disturbed soils and existing fill in footing areas should be removed
and the bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Based on our
observations, it is likely that the new north footing will be based in existing foundation
wall backfill, and we recommend that the new footing should extend down to the bearing
level ofthe existing foundation wall. The bearing soils should be protected against frost
and concrete should not be placed on frozen soils. Exterior footings should be provided
with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection.
As an alternative to spread footings, helical piers could be used to extend the bearing
level through the existing backfill and into natural bearing soils, however, there is some
risk that the piers may encounter cobbles and small boulders in the backfill and reach
penetration refusal short of their design installation depths and required torque. Helical
piers that bear in the backfill will have a risk of post-construction settlement.
Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies
such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as
retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an
equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for on-site predominantly granular soil as 4
f
backfill. A perimeter foundation drain should be provided (if not exposed during
construction) to prevent temporary buildup ofhydrostatic pressure behind the basement
wall and prevent wetting of the lower level.
Job No. 410 196A
C�CPtGCh
. �_ .-.
. -�
• .
.� ���.�����.��' ' ' � . �� �� -
���.����..���.�������� • ..
s���������������������������������� '
���i�������� �� ���������������� �
����
����i��s�����_��=-=����■���
., ���� � �����
������������� ��������� ����� '
��������� ��� ������� ����
����������_������������� ������
:. ��������r�� �������� ������
������������������������� ���� �
���� ������� ����v�
��������������� �������������
• ��������������������� ������
�-_�����������������=��� �
����
����������� ������ ��� �
.� ������������-��� �� �������� �
������������������ ��������� .�
�����1������������������� ����-��
• �������-�� ����� �
� '
s�����������'�������� ��������
, ���������������������� ���� . •
� ���������.v����'�������� �����
• ���� w������"������s��'���
� �C�° � �'��� ���'�.�����.� �
����..��,� �.��
o:������°���������■��C ..
�:�������������������C
�C��.��'���������■�.�����
• ���.����'����������.������.�
�:������p��G�C��'�������.� �
���������������������'.�����'�
�:��T�Cp��:�����.�°���p�p
� �C�����'��������������
�����,�����.��������p���. :.
�������C� ����C��•����.�..��
.���
���������������-��.�'����
� �C���,�'��..�������.�������
�C���r���������:�� '����C�� '�
��������������������������
������w�������������s�������
• ������������� �������� ��
• ���������=�-�
' � �� ��
..� .• .
' ' � � • •�• •� ��
� � . . .
._.
�
'�'' � .� - ����i .
• , � ,
.
A �
. �
• -
• • • • • -
•�• - '• • -• '
•
. � •� . �
�I . ' � ' �
.- � .
. - � Joel and Jane Gros
November 12, 2010
Page 3
Structural fill placed within floor slab areas can consist of the on-site soils compacted to
at least 95% of standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill
placed around the structure should be compacted and the surface graded to prevent
ponding within at least 5 feet of the building.
The existing foundation conditions should be evaluated by a structural engineer.
Limitations: The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation
of the soils exposed within the pits excavated at the east side of the existing building and
observation of the soils exposed below the ground floor in the north part of the lower
level. The risk of foundation movement may be greater than indicated in this report
because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions encountered during excavation
for the proposed footings. In order to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the
subsurface conditions below the excavation, drilling or additional excavation would be
required. It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the
recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the
presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC)
developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in
this special field of practice should be consulted.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
.�=��=,�
QP�r1 ���/S'l
:��^�. F9
Trevor L. Kne ,�.�' �:
3846�
Rev. by: SLP 'Oy: ��-�s-ro :���
TLK/
o�FSS�ONA���c?�
Attachment Figure 1 — Gradation Test Results
Job No.410 196A
C�ECPtGCh
�s,� �w�����4;"z��r���,��: ��'���� �'T �.� T�.r� r� :...� '��,r � 3 s =s �, 7 ..�rc.r s z+�7a�` �� r •
.,�,�'s,� � �6i' zc a"� :?.a, "�' � -� fsa y 9't: � ..,-z' t�,"�'2'* �... X � ��h€����2� �$. � �- $� � -. ��°�w fi� .�� � �}
:x�' , 48��.4ya �i� ' �s x,;..��� . � ;"`*s �`:"� r'r �+ � �z��a rs � �`� '� . `�'.� -, S ,�� �"�a �" .k`';u',".;?,� �
;a; �����2 �,�� `` '�- ��;„ .�✓�; � a a v x n �� � �, ��� �a u;,a�� �;�x�� t�.�,���'��;ss ?�2�'�;�,��ra y� ��s`��
u; rr" �;� k �, r �� s;��' y, ��.p�i,�, sr� i ��:,. v� .� a�' f�'����� ��" .� s 7, � �� ���,��'�,�. 4 �;
a'��; � k ����.x s�` �'s' a �' vs� r: 13 .k�x3'c �f €� s � u.r � §'� $s� ..,��. �.°��y a �>"ax .
`�` �,��'� � ��,� ��" � � =�z� � Department of:Commun� 'D�velo meni��'�
�.� � ;
3 ' �!' . P
C';�'�� �3� �3` R,l� ,.�.'^ ��� ,.��� ,� ". � .K�y.�.�..��� 1 . � .e��:: a3.
� � �, �a,����� � � � � '�x ,�g�.� ;��� �75 South Frontage Ra i!
�"4. a� .,;, .,���t� � ��`x.� t- � r� � ��^ § " � �'��.e$, *,`�F`1:� � "cr�' `"ri #�
'� �. " ,p� � . .� ;� � � , ,��� � r��,�� . �-Va�!£�i�ofa� �
'h'� ,��; p�i41�r�-�� � ���
x t� �� � �.,� r;� � x �y,,, �
� f �,� f q P'i' _Wyj . 3� � ��}� ..a ,a'�CF
� �.
..� � . � �$i �.#'�'L 9 `,i� ��u`� 4 R� `� ��
T ^�v,,,� ; �i
�a � p��.'�`' �� `�..�,n MY� s.�f� , �,R. '�+,_.+ e 1a.
���-.a�, _ . �;. .+,. .�* .� , rs;. .�,�.(.` ::
,� ` � - �,� - R�ie s��ne� �'
;„a �- �. +4� +`.a�,z�t
+�� �� �yr .
TRANSMITTAL FORM
Revision Submittals:
1. "Field$et"of approved plans MUST accompany revisions.
2. No further inspections will be pertormed until the revisions are approved 8�the permit is re-issued.
3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55.00 per hour(2 hour minimum),and are due upon issuance.
Permit#(s)information applies to: Attention: ( ) Revisions �
E
E � ( ) Response to Correction Letter #
� �� ����� attached copy of correction letter �
( ) Deferred Submittal I
(�Other �
�
Project Street Address: �
t S� � 1 S �y����, �(Q Description/List of Changes: �
Number �
( ) (Street) (Suite#) � C ^ cf�
Building/Complex Name: � t G 'e� �
;� 3s � � �- �
�Contact Information: ` ,/
Company: C���L �O c,,�r0.�1�— ,p/�e�i�-�((�
` ,���� �.,� �� �"�
Company Address: � �
City: State: Zip: ¢� � r� �`�-� C�
� �a 1-a� C'_e-�.���ct-
�Contact Name: �_,/�e)S
�Contad Phone: 1 �
E-Mail_ � �l�/ � �-l� �
�
:
�
Valuations(Labor 8�Material)) �
F Building: $ � ����� �
�Plumbing: $ (use additional sheet if necessary) �
_______....__............_._..---..__....--__--_...._.�._....__...._..--- - -- -- --
Electrical: $
Date Received:
Mechanical: $ �
CTotal: n ��,� $_ L��, �v LS � � 0 V �
V�/� �
' D
�_ __-__------- ��_ _ __ ----________-__ __._ __--_---____ __�_ ___ _---.
MAR 18 2011
TOWN OF VAIL
1-Sep-09
� � . , _. .. � _, .
_ `,.:.�� Department of Community Cevelopment-
� ��v 75 South Frantage Rorsd
�
- � � ��° ��. "`�,� ��> _ ° Vai1,-Colorado 81657
�:.
�"'_�.,'�, :� ' �� � �."� f,x-.,� �� Te(: 970-479-2i 28.
# � �= '�x � ;.` Web: www.vailgov.com
��:; % �
�`�,��° ��a . � � Developinent Review Coardinator�
� ���� ����.� .��� � , y ,: ,. a
c {}t{ �.. .,:;. ., , _ .`_: � .
� �,�A �i3 G.`�. _... 4..,....._.�.,.. .... .����....»�t�'."'�..�� .:�� ' -. . ,> . _ .,�..�..�.,.��,.w.a,. �
���a
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
(Separate applications are required for alarm & sprinkler)
Project Street Address: ? � Project#: �T ��—���} 7
t--� 5�—,� d✓L�� JCl�'� �
(Number) (Street) ui e#) DRB#:��� �� �(�� �
�' � Building Permit#:���� Q��l0
Building/Complex Name: �'/ "
Lot#: Block# Subdivision:
Contractor Information �
� I
Business Name: �iYl�'YL� �oL� �i1 cc G l� Work Class: New( ) Addition( ) Alteration�/)
'l`-
Business Address: Type of Building:
City � �� � State:�_Zip: �� G( 5_� Single-Family O Duplex O Multi-Family(�(} �
�� Commercial( ) Other( ) �
Contact Name:
Contact Phone: �3 �(1 g 2/, _�,�Sa Work Type: Interior O Exterior O Both(�)
Contact E-Mail: Valuation of
, Work Included Plans Included Work �
Contractor Registratio Number:
� , Electrical (y�)Yes ( )No ('sG)Yes ( )No �Q
4 � Mechanical 'Yes No Yes No C�-�.9
X � (k) O (� O ��_ .
Owner/ ner's Repr s ntative Signature(Required) °Plumbing ( �)Yes ( )No (,�Yes ( )No l D 0 d ' •
Project Informatio �` �} �Building (j`)Yes ( )No (�Yes ( )No� 1� I�' �O
Owner Name: � �
�Value of all work being performed: $ �����
Parcel#: �� �(value based on IBC Section 109.3 8�IRC Section 108.3�
(For Parcel#,co tact Eagle County Assessors Office at(970-328-8640 or visit ; � �
www.eaglecounty.uslpatie) i Electrical Square Footage
�
Detailed Scope and Location of Work: � � ��
- � � �,
�— � � �
(use additional sheet if necessary)
� I
For Office Use Only: Date Received: � �ni. � (� M 2
Fee Paid: �91�_9y 4A.LK D llr� �� �� Lc
Received From: �or� C�Qos MAR 16 2011
Cash Check # 71�JO
CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # exp date: TOWN OF VAIL
Auth #
O1-Jan-I 1
`
p�s���a��9
�$lo �oya3
Asbestos Inspection and Sampling Report
135Q Sandstone Rd. #6, Vail, Color-ado 81657
I
Presen ted to:
Mr. Richard Ste-Marie
Sunlite Development, LLC.
P.O. Box 3325
Breckenridge, CO 80424
(970) 390-8652
Performed&Prepared by:
Mr. Nate Skinner
DS Consulting, Inc.
PO Box 6864
Avon, CO 81620
970-476-4182
Project Details:
DSC Project#: 2860
Conducted: September 30, 2010
� Consultin
�
..�
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY �
On September 30, 2010, Mr. Nate Skinner of DS Consulting, Inc. (DSC) performed a limited inspection and
asbestos bulk-sampling at 1350 Sandstone Rd. #6, Vail, Colorado, in order to identify potentially
hazardous friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials (ACM) within the above-referenced,
single family residence where renovations activities are planned. The Colorado Department of Public
Health and Environment's (CDPHE) Regulation 8, Part B defines an asbestos-containing material (ACM) as
a material containing more than 1%asbestos.
Mr. Skinner performed asbestos bulk-sampling of drywall (surfacing material) in a total of three (3)
locations within the residence (see Appendix A for sample locations). All three (3) bulk-samples were
analyzed by Aerobiology Laboratory Associates, Inc. (NVLAP #200860-0) with all three (3) laboratory
results reporting as negative for asbestos (see Appendix C for laboratory results).
2
PROJECT OVERVIEW
I. Introduction
A limited inspection and bulk-sampling for ACM was conducted at 1350 Sandstone Rd. #6,Vail, Colorado,
by Mr. Skinner on September 30, 2010, at the request of Mr. Richard Ste-Marie with Sunlite Development.
Mr. Skinner is a Colorado State Certified Building Inspector; having EPA Accreditation #16227 (see
Appendix B for certificate). The purpose of the inspection was to identify, sample and assess potentially
hazardous friable and non-friable ACM within the residence.
II. Structural Design
The structure is a multi-level unit, in a multi-unit complex.
III. Sampling and Analytical Procedures
The inspection, assessment and sampling were conducted by an EPA and AHERA accredited Building
Inspector qualified by experience, education and training in the recognition of potential ACM and
approved bulk-sampling techniques. The asbestos bulk-sampling was conducted on suspect ACM with a
limited number of bulk-samples being collected within the residence.
The inspection, assessment and sampling were performed in accordance with Environmental Protection
Agency/AHERA recommended procedures. These procedures call for the visual inspection of the area of
concern and the collection and analysis of representative bulk-samples of suspect material.
Some minor destructive sampling was conducted. Walls, columns and perimeter pipe chases were not
broken into in order to locate and quantify suspect ACM. It should be noted that additional ACM might be
located in these and other inaccessible areas.
Random bulk-samples, representative of the suspect asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM) of
each homogeneous area (HA), were collected according to the guidelines published as Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule: Title II of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 USC, Sections
2641 through 2654 and in compliance with 40 CFR, Part 763. Representative sampling is based on the
following criteria:
1. The distribution of the suspect material throughout the HA.
2. The suspect material's physical characteristics and application.
3. Random sampling patterns determined for each HA.
Suspect materials sampled and analyzed should be considered to be representative of materials in each
HA if they exhibit similar physical characteristics and the application of the sampled material can be
correlated to the application of un-sampled material. Bulk-samples collected were analyzed utilizing the
EPA's Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Buildinq Materials (EPA 600/R/116, July, 1993)
and the McCrone Research Institute's The Asbestos Particle Atlas as methods references. Analysis of the
bulk-samples was performed on the"date reported,"as listed in the bulk-sample analysis report.
3
IV. Notes on Report Format
Suspect materials alike in appearance and application were sampled as HAs. Suspect materials were
divided into three classifications:
1. Surfacing Material: sprayed or troweled onto structural building member.
2. Thermal System Insulation (TSI): any type of pipe,boiler,tank, or duct insulation.
3. Miscellaneous Material: other suspect materials, floor tile, sheet vinyl/linoleum, ceiling tiles, ,
insulation,and finishing materials. '
Condition assessments were performed by the accredited inspector at the time of inspection. Condition
assessments are listed in the following section. Ratings of "good," "damaged," and "significantly
damaged" are meant to indicate the overall condition of the material.
A material in "good" condition has no visible damage or deterioration, or showing only very limited
damage or deterioration.
A material in "damaged" condition has the following characteristics: The surface is crumbling, blistered,
water-stained, gouged, marred or otherwise abraded over less than one-tenth of the surface if the
damage is evenly distributed (one-quarter if the damage is localized). Accumulation of powder, dust or
debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as
confirmatory evidence. A material in "significantly damaged" condition has one or more of the following
characteristics:
• The surface is crumbling or blistered over at least one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly
distributed (one-quarter if the damage is localized).
• One-tenth (one-quarter, if localized) of the material is hanging from the surface, deteriorated, or
showing adhesive failure.
• Water stains, gouges, or mars are over at least one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly
distributed (one-quarter if the damage is localized). Accumulation of powder, dust or debris
similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as
confirmatory evidence.
Response-action recommendations for asbestos-containing HAs are listed in the section VII.
Recommendations may be for more than one HA, if materials are alike. Recommendations are either
"general" or "immediate." An immediate recommendation indicates the presence of asbestos greater
than 1% within the bulk-sample, or a bulk-sample in the same HA, and should be addressed accordingly.
A general recommendation indicates asbestos does not exist greater than 1% within the bulk-sample, or
a bulk-sample in the same HA, and no further abatement activities are required for removal of the
material. Any sample reporting a "TRACE" amount of asbestos must be considered to be positive for
asbestos greater than 1% unless it is analyzed by the point-count method to be less than 1%.
V. Inspector Comments
No asbestos-containing material (ACM) was identified during the bulk-sampling conducted at 1350
Sandstone Rd. #6, Vail, Colorado. A total of three (3) bulk-samples were collected from drywall within
the above-referenced residence. All three (3) bulk-samples tested negative for asbestos.
4
VI. Homogeneous Area Descriptions
The following section contains sampled HA descriptions and sample locations. Percent-asbestos content
for each sample indicated can vary depending on sample locations, homogeneity of the materials, and
type of application. The following samples were collected from the single family residence at 1350
Sandstone Rd. #6, Vail, Colorado, on September 30, 2010. The quantities are approximations and are
subject to field verification:
� � � . . � , � � � � . . � . . �
Sample#: DW1-1 Sample#: DW1-2
Sample Description: Drywall Sample Description: Drywall
Sample Location: Living Room Wall Sample Location: Upstairs Bedroom Wall
Material Classification:Surfacing Material Material Classification: Surfacing Material
Material Quantity: < 1000ftz Material Quantity: < 1000ftz
Material Condition: Good Material Condition: Good
Physical Description (layers):White tape; White Physical Description (layers):White tape;White
texture w/white paint;White joint compound; joint compound;White texture w/white paint;
White tan d all White tan d all
Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative; Negative; Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative; Negative;
Ne ative; Ne ative Ne ative; Ne ative
Recommendations: GENERAL- See Section VII Recommendations: GENERAL - See Section VII
1 � • . . � . �
Sample#: DW1-3
Sample Description: Drywall
Sample Location: Living Room Wall
Material Classification: Surfacing Material
Material Quantity: < 1000ftz
Material Condition: Good
Physical Description (layers):White/tan drywall
w white aint
Asbestos Detected(layers): Negative
Recommendations: GENERAL - See Section VII
VII. Recommendations
GENERAL:
The laboratory results of the potential ACM sampled at 1350 Sandstone Rd. #6, Vail, Colorado, indicate
that all three (3) bulk-samples of drywall collected were reported as negative for asbestos. Therefore, no
professional abatement activities are recommended to remove the above-referenced material.
5
I
��
�
APPENDIX A
SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Living
Room
DW 1-1
DW1-3
Upstairs
Bedroom
Master
Bed room
DW 1-2
6
APPENDIX B
CERTIFICATION
_ -� __�
j �!s� �``'�#f t �� � s� 1,k.'' �� �-t� � �t �� ��
r r' .k a .w w ti t. �,r
k , 1 fi ;a � ; x ,'.,*�� �+ S ';i r ` „ , a `, ..,t
w� � �,: .. .;
s . �..C- '1�� "�,� ��"�1 �'� �''� A �'`,,,���, •,� "� M^'� `'9�k �1h�: ��
� "` �
r' - � � � -
� � :�i
i �
� ;:-��e STATE OF COLORADO -���j .,�=
r �; �
� � �,� .aSBES`I'OS � :,;
��� '�� CI:RTIFIC:�'TIO\X �3 � `�`
�� r,�
��� `�
,.. �
`"' ('utoradu t7rparuix nt ot Publ�c t tralth �'
� '. ��_ :�n.9 Fn�irutttncnt ' 7�
�}: :�ir Pc�{lution('��nuol l��visitm '�
�'� ,
F �
�
R �'� � � � Thj:certilies that � '��
� � ,� ��
,� •
,,� :; .� \athan Skinncr ;,� �} �-
t ° �: � :.t
�, ,-� :�,
,� ('crtilic•rtiun\u: ib22'] ;J
t �
5 ,�✓�,
<r �: �wM
��,' � ficu u�rt t}k rrywrrm�nt�ut'?---�1�' (.K.ti.and Air QuaEity C'untrut t� ��`ti�
� .- :�; Cottuntss�on Rc�ulahon\o.S.Hart B and�s hrrch� ccrti lird by thc .� ,...�
.
"�: st:ttr ot C'olorsdo�r,[hc tullot�im�dtsciplinc. .. ;'%'.
y ,� .,,�•
� .` ��* ,� t
� : �f�� [3uildin�; Inspertor* ,'� �-r
r ' �.�-�%:
,
, ._ , .
, �'_ Is,ued: :i612010 � �
�( � •..
`4� ��; t:zpiresoo: L612011 T�
�l''r!i'f --, .Z 13i
J
f� i t '�n� � ����
/
� t * k�f��`
� � �� � . �
� ;: . .. ��.v
«.*
`C!" �'.. •rris c+bT.,u�b.�Gr.dj wr au�t..xu4../.c�.....nV.:.w..yrf.nK.tuaY�i�«�w.,. �-' � . �
ma/i��rsiwut4lrarqrliw�ry..i/w/o[�.rc �.;�
� ,�� � . . ., , . �=A. =�,T .�.:`�i
. .
t _ _::�ri:._�:..i . ,_� . ....
"` # �1'� �i M. �r' �R,_—�+r �y _+v` �, _ar"•�F _�.„�, �'�= %.
z �' � <: . �� �� '°�
�...'-% . `�..._,�:.� j� rt���PT � � •i'�1�'�{.�`'s`.,:a«��..s�•`'v:�� .:.'J , ",l
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
7
�AEROblO�OC��/ LAbORATOR)/
�ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
CONSULTING LABORATORY
Certificate of Analysis
13949 W.Colfax Ave
Suite 205
Lakewood,CO 80401
303.232.3746
www.aerobioloqv.net
Client Name DS Consutling,lnc. �����+ Date Collected: 09/30/10
Street address 5366 Flauock Ct. a Date Received: 09/30/10
Ciry,State ZIP Morrison,CO 80465 Date Analyzed: 09/30/10
A[ttt: Nate Skinner NVLAP Lab Code 200860-0 Date Reported: 10/O1/10
Client Project Name: 1350 Sandstone.Dr.Unit 6 Vail 81657 Project ID: 107292
Job ID:
Test Requested: 3002,Asbestos in Bulk Samples
Method: Polazized Light Microscopy/Dispersion Staining(PLM),Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.EPA-600/R-93/116,July 1993.
Homo- Number Asbestos Detected Non-Asbestos Non-Fibrous Matrix
Sam le Identification Physical Description of Sample; geneous of Fibers Material Material
Client Lab Sam le Number Additional Comments es/no La ers% azea% azea% com osition
98°/a
107292-1A White Tape N 4,5% Negative CELL 2
107292-1B White Texture w/White Paint N 4,10% Negative 100 C
DW 1-1
107292-1C White Joint Compound N 4,15% Negative 100 G
15%
107292-iD White/Tan Dry�vall N 4,70% Negative CELL 85 G
98%
107292-2A White Tape N 4,5% Negative CELL 2
107292-2B White Joint Compound N 4,10% Negative 100 G
DW 1-2
107292-2C White Texture w/White Paint N 4,20% Negative 100 C
15%
107292-2D WhitelTan Dry�vall N 4,65% Negative CELL 85 G
15%
DW 1-3 107292-3 White/Tan Drywall w/White Paint N 1, 100% Negative CELL 85 G
�?�-�.1=�,��-
Paul Knappe
Laboratory Analyst
; i
_ _
/ r �
am ump eys
Asbestos Laboratory Supervisor
A=Amosite
AC=Actinolite
AN=Anthophyllite
CHRY=Chrysotile
CR=Crocidolite
TR=Tremolite
Trace=Less Than I%
Page 1 of 2 13949 W.Colfax Ave.Suite 205,Lakewood CO 80401,3032323746
CELL=Cellulose
MW=Mineral Wool
FBG=Fiberglass
SYN=Synthetic
WO=Wollastonite
NTR=Non-Asbestiform TR
NAC=Non-Asbestiform AC
FT=Fibrous Talc
AH=Animal Hair
Q=Quartz
C=Cazbonates
V=Vermiculite
G=Gypsum
M=Mica
T=Tar
P=Perlite
O=Organic
B=Binder
OP=Opaques
D=Diatoms
�AERObIO�OC,�y LAbORATORy
�ASSOCIATES,INCORPORATED
CONSUL111G 1�18pRAtORY Certificate of Analysis
DS Consutling,Inc. �����r
5366 Flatrock Ct.
Morrison,CO 80465
Nate Skinner NVLAP Lab Code 200860.0
Client Project Name: 1350 Sandstone.Dr.Unit 6 Vail 81657
13949 W.Colfau Ave
swce 2os
Lakewood,CO 80401
303.2323746
www.aerobioloav.net
Date Collected: 09/30/10
Date Received: 09/30/10
Date Analyzed: 09/30/10
Date Reported: 10/O1/10
Project ID: 107292
Job ID:
General Notes
♦ Negative indicates no asbestos was detected;the method detection limit is 1%.
♦ Trace or"<I"indicates asbestos was identified in the sample,but the concentration is less than the method detection limit of 1%.
♦ All regulated asbestos minerals(i.e.chrysotile,amosite,crocidolite,anthophyllite,Vemolite,and actinolite)were sought in every layer of each sample,but only those asbestos
minerals detected are listed.Amosite is the common name for the asbestiform variety of the minerals cummingtonite and grunterite. Crocidolite is the common name used for the
asbestiform variery of the mineral reibekite.
♦ Tile,vinyl,foam,plastic,and fine powder samples may contain asbestos fibers of such small diameter(<025 microns in diameter)that these fibers cannot be detected by PLM.
For such samp(es,more sensitive analytical methods(e.g.TEM,SEM,and XRD)are recommended if greater ceRainty about asbestos content is required. Semi-quantitative bulk TEM
floor tile analysis is accepted under the NESHAPS regulations.
♦ These resulu are submitted pursuant to Aerobiology Laboratory Associates,Inc.'s current tertns and conditions of sale,including the company's standard warranty and limitation
of liabiliry provisions. No responsibiliry or liability is assumed for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted.
♦ Unless notified in writing to retum the samples covered by this report,Aerobiology Laboratory Associates,Inc.will store the samples for a minimum period of thirty(30)days
before discarding. A shipping and handling charge will be assessed for the return of any samples.
Notes Reauired bv NVLAP
♦ This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification,approval,or endorsement by NVLAP,NIST,or any agency of the Federal Govemment.
♦ This test report relates only to the items tested or calibrated.
♦ This report is not valid unless it bears the name of a NVLAP-approved signatory.
♦ Any reproduction of this document must include the entire document in order for the report to be valid.
13949 W.Colfax Ave.Suite 205,Lakewood CO 80401,303.232.3746
� i
� �
�, MICHAEL
� HAZARD
� ASSOCIATES
� AF2CHIT�CTURt
� PLANNING
� INTERIORS
�
�
� � l 1O�
� ,
� F�� 1VI O D � L� ���-� ��� ���_
�� .
� {.EVIEWEC� �=�� ����
� �OMPLIA �E �
� Date:
• By' �
� Code�
� 1
� � � � ��� � �
y � � � � �--- �
� FIX7'URE SGI--IEDULE �
,
LI C�-�I7'
&
CUT'SHEET'S
�.
� Town of 1/all
� O�
• FICE COPY
\
�
� �/� nn
3. � � V � � V � �
� s✓ �
�""` MARCH 4, 2011 �.o. �oX ,068
' '�+'" MAR 1 s 2011 VAIL,COLORADO
� 81658
� � �� ���� �� ���� 970.949.4958 P
� 970.376.0066 C
� �,,� �a� MHA@VAIL.NET
�� �
�
: � �
w O
� U
cD � � � � � w
� � Z
W i- cn � � � O J
'J Q � ? � ^ O � CO
2 � � T z � m O � � m >
U Q � � Q W � � � O O Q
� 2 Q Q � � . � . � � co rn rn �
� �
� �
� �
U V
'� �
N cJ
� �
h y
G C
C C
'b 'b
Q' Q'
� �
� �
ti � �
7 7 =
O O �
U U �O
C C �
Ci� Li7
� � O
Lr.
' ' 3
0 0
W a`. a` �
U �„ y °'
z = � `'
W � � �
�
�= � �
A = � �
� � � �
� b b b
� � � �
� � � �' �
�
a � � .+ O V f-1.
� � U � �
� � � �
F-' F-' � 'O N
N ¢ b 3
� � � � a� �o
� � cd w
� �
� C :b v� C
m N
� G � � 3 � o �
z � �-
�° x � Q
E �� �� �
U x x S � c r,n °; �
� ,o v � ° c � R
u y? y o x � : c� �
a, � � � o � �x `�' C�
o U U � � � � E .ti
ca >,
u C ❑ C: ¢ � c� � >
v o o � � y ia y O
V N W
O. 7 i"�
o U a � CL
a y U �
� R. .ctl7
— .� � 3 H o � 3 �
O � � N � p � C M Oq
,'�., � � � a. a=i N M �X E-� [L �
N � vVi � �/1
L 0. O O �o � �y., o'o M U � � O
� £ v, v, .� �c o c� o. � 3 3 _
� � N � O 7 .-. � �" �y N O �
� '^ 3
M
�" GQ ¢ �
•� U � N �
F: 3 X o 3
� U � �
�
ai a`�'i U � �, o �
E E � 3 ^ � .
� � �
F F= � °q � �
U C
��., � ¢' � �n �n a' �
c c U x ^ Q �
w w � a�ai a`i'. 3 i
� � o y
� �� � � 0 3 >
co w 3 � x N = 3 0
o a � ¢ � o W H g �
z � � � � .� N `° x
bD N N � '"'� � � '� ,.`C O ¢ �
nr. � w S U � � ro U a
V
�
C �
'� Q
X a
�
N 0.
� � y G 'w°�^, � �
�: 2' � .. h v� ,� :?
� � .� � = _"x o °q Q
d � � F � 3 x F' T °.3
'O r-� U �--� y �
O r-1 i„a � C. Q0. � Q, � p
U �
0
nn '�
pp G o0
a`r � ❑
3
V � � � W �
� 4� W i"� .L N "'�
C o O O o �] � = �] �
� � � � � W `a � W v�
s
�A
�oA �oA �
W c c o
� y
� .� .d � on
A a� a� p ,C
D A F �
W � �y � ti �0.0
x ` ` °
� a 3 b � �
U o R � Ty �-' U V U � c
�W •C. a'bi abi � o 0 0 0 � �
N N .--� ,� � a U
�L �n �' V] V] V] i..
� � � � ° � 3 3 3 ° �
E�
� �
� m U rzi rs. U �SC
Q ry F
F � V U �
V 0. �l Cil _-1 C'"' �C Y'
1� � W � Q a � Q
�, z
� � � � � � � t � � � � ` ` � � � t � � � � � � � � rr � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
�
�.
� MICHAEL
�M HAZAR D
�
� IECC 2009 Fixture Count ASSOCIATES
�
Tag Lamp Type uantity Tag Lamp Type uantity AkcH�T�cTUH�
� C FL 11 A Incantlescent � PLANNING
� D FL B Incandescent 4 ,r�Hior�s
G Linear Fluorescent E Incandescent
� H LED Tape 4
� 1 LED Task Lights
�
�
�
�
�
e
�
�
i �
�
i
i
I
� Total High Efficacy: 31 Total Other: 31
! Percentage
� High
Efficacy: 50.00%
I,
l�.
�.
� ,
�
�
�
�
• P.o.Box 1068
• VAIL,COLORADO
• 81658
970.949.4958 P
• 970.376.0066 C
iMHA@VAILNET
•
•
•
•
•
�
�
' Fixture A
� f�� 33 West Beaver Creek Road Richmond Hill
! � EuRofase Ontario Canada L46 1L8
�r $' 800.660.5391
�+ � 800.660.5390
� � info@eurofase.com
� � www.eurofase.com
�
� 1-LIGHT MR16
W/TRANSFORMER , 1-LIGHT
C MR16 SQUARE TRIMLESS
�' MULITPLE
� �!"l`?C�i�rt C�-�;
(� Collection: Iiluminations
Model No.: TE211 TR
� Height: 5.19"
Width: 4"
E _ ::A * Length: 4„
� No.of Bulbs: 1
Bulb Wattage: 50 watts
'` Bulb Type: MR16/C
� � �' Bulb Base: GU5.3
c Bulb Voltage: 12 volts
�, ;�i:, ��i`•-: .
�' ITEM CODE FINISH SHADE
�, TE211TR black n!a
L
C Recessed multi-light fixture series. Designed for remodel
applications but also suitable for new construction FINISH SHADE
applications.Adjustable 35°on both axis for aiming in any
� direction. Invisible trim with plaster frame.Transformer black ' n/a
� required,sold separately.
�
� � �
Cs s„6• �. �
� I _�� 1'�
-,�-.
��� ;.
�.
�r„ I
� ' � �
� I z
� o
�- � Q
� Project Information z
Job Name: Date: Type: —
f' __ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _._ __. ----_ . � �
�� -____.
Comments:
� _. _ . _ _ _) �
__ __ _._ _.__
� �
�
�
e
•
-
�
�' Fixture B
iw- � 33 West Beaver Creek Road Richmond Hill
� � EuROfase Ontario Canada L4B 1L8
$ 800.660.5391
� II� 800.660.5390
� � info@eurofase.com
� � www.eurofase.com
�
� 2-LIGHT MR16
W/TRANSFORMER , 2-LIGHT
� MR16 TRIMLESS MULTIPLE
� Pro�!,�c± �t,ecifications
� Collection: Illuminations
Model No.: TE212TR
� Height: 5.19"
Width: 4"
� Length: 8.5"
� No.of Bulbs: 2
Bulb Wattage: 50 watts
� Bulb Type: MR16/C
Bulb Base: GU5.3
� Bulb Voltage: 12 volts
r` „�� �=
�
� ITEM CODE FINISH SHADE
TE212TR biack n/a
�
�
Recessed multi-light fixture series. Designed for remodel FINISH SHADE
� applications but also suitable for new construction black ' n/a
applications.Adjustable 35°on both axis for aiming in any
� direction. Invisible trim with plaster frame.Transformer
required,sold separately.
�a
�
� � J �
� 53�16' ��p2c`�' . �.p}����
� .V: �' ."L1': ,
�1[-, �I[•_
i`� `` i`� l 1
�j � 8�lT� `--I
� �
� 4 � � �
� � z
� o
t� � Q
� Project Information z
� Job Name: _ Date: Type: �
Comments:
`. _���--�—� v____._..r �.___..._.__._=�__r____A��._^��^`____ J
� J
�
�
•
•
�
�
� Fixture C
� HALO
DESCRIPTION
� Halo��Eco-Twistr"" takes energy efficient compact fluorescent lighting to • •� � �-
the next generation of technology with a NEW twist compact fluorescent
�� lamp and ballast system. The H2781CAT incorporates this new CFL tech- • . -
nology in an insulated ceiling housing rated for direct contact with ceil
�, ing insulation. The H2781CAT AIRTITE'"'housing design prevents airflow . �, .
between attic and living areas and saves on both heating and air condi-
�, tioning costs.The electronic compact fluorescent ballast is a new multi-
wattage design allowing complete interchangeability between 16,21,
�, and 28 watt lamps. The Halo Eco-Twist system is designed to allow easy
, transition from energy-consuming incandescent lamps to a new genera-
l tion of energy-saving,low profile,high color CFLs. Halo Eco-Twist ac-
complishes this transition by offering direct compatibility with a wide
�� selection of current Halo trims designed originally for the incandescent
p 'A-lamp"
t, 'i
� DESIGN FEATURES ' � �
A...Housing • Pass-N-Thru'""feature allows bar G...Electronic Ballast � �'�
�4 Single wal�aluminum housing. Sealed hangers to be shortened without Models are provided with a 120 Volt,
and gasketed forAIRTITE installation, removing from plasterframe. residentially rated,multi-wattage elec-
p" with the ceiling-contact gasket tronic fluorescent ballast.The ballast is
� pre-installed on the plaster frame. Can ' Bar hangers do not need to be rated for interchangeable use with 16,
be used in 2"x 8"'oist construction. removed from frame for shortening
�' 1 21,and 28 watt GZ16q base Compact
Housing adjusts for ceilings up to 1-3/8" • Score lines allow"tool-less" Fluorescent lamps. Ballast is a high
thick shortening for 12"joists frequency electronic type,UL Listed H2781CAT
C Class P,Type 1 Outdoor.Ballast includes
B...Plaster Frame • Bar hangers may be repositioned 90° 6"Insulated Ceiling
�" Includes regressed locking screw for InherentThermal Protection,and end of
W hanger bars and cutouts for crimping • IntegralT-bar clips snaps ontoT-bars- �amp life protection feature that shuts AIR-TITE""
� hanger bars in position. no additional clips required. down the ballast upon lamp failure. Recessed Housing
C...Junction Box E...Socket H...Air-TiteT'"
(� • Listed for through branch circuit GZ16q is a 4-pin socket with easyTWIST Patent Pending socket interface main-
` wiring &CLICK'"" locking installation action. tains airtight rating of 6"aperture Air- 6"TRIMS
The socket allows interchangeable use Tite rated trims.
� • Positioned to accommodate straight with 16,21,and 28 watt lamps.
conduit runs Labels For use with:
P' F...Lamp • UL Listed for Dam Location 76 Watt/21Watt/28 Watt
4 • Seven 1/2"trade size conduit SpiralTwist Compact Fluorescent lamp p
� knockouts with true pry-out slots (purchase separately) • UL Listed wet location with select Low Profile,SpiralTwist
trims
• Slide-N-Side'"' connectors allow • T3 Low Profile Spira�Twist Compact Fluorescent Lamps
non-metallic sheathed cable to be • UL Listed for Direct Contact with
� installed without tools and without • BaseType:GZ76q(4-Pin base with Insulation and combustible material �+ `.' {'TMtr;`-�
removing knockouts.Accepts a wider Twist&Click action) • UL listed for FeedThrough �vO_�Y��S`
e range of non-metallic sheathed cable . CCT:2700°K • UL,cUL Listed
� -the standard cable types used in w
lighting for both U.S.and Canada. • CRI:86 Compliance
�,�-�s �
� -Allows wiring connections to be Lamp Designations • State of CaliforniaTitle 24 2008 High .e;* � ;�
made outside the junciion box Efficacy Compliant iswan ziwen zawax
• 28 Watt:CF28lW/E/GZ16q/827/LS . Meets Washington State Energy Code
� -Simply insert the cable directly 1,675 Lumens FOR USE IN
into the trap after connections . 2�Watt:CF21TW/E/GZ16q/827/LS ' Meeis NewYork State Energy INSULATED CEILINGS
� are made Conservation Construction Code FOR DIRECT CONTACT
1,225 Lumens
-accommodates the following • International Energy Conservation
C • 16 Watt:CF16TW/E/GZ16q/827/LS Code High Efficacy Compliant WITH INSULATION
standard non-metallic sheathed g�0 Lumens
cable types: • Certified AIR-TITE'"" under ASTM-E283
�' (US)#14/2,#74/3,#12/2,#12/3 • Lamp Available:Living Spaces'""
(Canada)#14/2,#14/3,#12/2. brand from Osram Syivania,and from Patents Energy Data
� Halo-see accessories • Housings andTrims may be covered nnn�.sian��9Tem„ so��d aaim9 ciassn
D....Bar Hangers by one or more ofthe following s°Fi-zo°c
Bar Han er Features include: • Over 10,000 hour rated average life U.S.Patents and additional Patents
� 9 EMI/RFl Emissions FCC 47CFR Part 18
• Pre-installed nail easily installs in • 86 CRI rated lamps with enhanced R9 Pending. co�s�mer umits
regular lumber,engineered lumber red that provides excelfent co�or and -Housings:6076788,6082878, Input Frequency60 Hz PowerFactor>0.50
� and laminated beams high visual comfort 6147307,6498295 THO<ieov InputVOltage 120V
• Safety and guidance system prevents • Color temperature of 2700°K for warm -Trims:5662413,6726347,5673997 cre:�raao�<i.� Ballastfactor7.04
� snagging,ensures smooth straight incandescent-like light Inpu[Powerl8W
� nai penetration and allows bar
i sw
hangers to be easify removed if A InpulCurrent0.28Amax
� necessary. E � � ��a�� zW i�p�iPOwerzaw
• Automatic levelling flange aligns � Inpu�Current0.38Amax
the housing and lets you hold the F c 2eW Input Power 32W
�j housing in place with one hand while ' ro,v�ew i�,utCurrent0.45Amax
e n._�°--.:-�, v
driving nails - __ �i a
�� • Housing can be positioned at any ° _- o ��
_ r,
z
,;
�� point within 24"joist span ��� � J ���� � �„ „�Nq���. ��
� � i ""mN�
�� cia�� , , .. �n°fi�ml 'Imm
��� f�ssmml_..� o �
openlno �I4e��minl� 1�:
� / ENFAGYSTAR
�PER Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ADV090638
� www.cooperlighting.com Consult your representative for additional options and finishes
�
�
�
� Fixture C H2781CAT
I� ORDERING INFORMATION
k,
SAMPLE NUMBER: H2781CAT-30WAT
� Order housing, trim,lamp,and accessories separately.
� Housing Trims Reflectors, Wall Wash, Baffles,Adjustable, Lensed lShower Rated/
�
� H2781CAT=insulated Ceiling REFLECTORS
Housing AIR-TITET"' ADJUSTABLES
� SuperTrim-AIR-TITETM
2YEAR LIMITED WARRANTY � 30CAT=Specular qear,Air-Tite Eyeball-30°7ilt
Ener Star Labeled Reoessed 30HAT=Haze,Air-Tite
� 9Y 78P=White Eyeball
��9h��n9 30 30RGAT=Residential Gold,Air-Tite 78SN=Satin Nickel
Cooper Lighting(The Company)warrents OD: 7 7/4'U84mm) 7g 76B=6rass Eyeball
this product(°the producY')against 78AC=Antique Copper
defects in material or workmanship for a SuperTrim-AIR-TITE^' 78TBZ=Tuscan Bronze
�, period of two years from date of original 30SBAT=Specular Black,Air-Tite 78PB=Polished Brass Eyeball
purchase,and agrees to repair or,at the OD: 7 1/4'1184mm) 78PAT=Whi[e Eyeball IAIR-TITE)
company's option,replace a defective 30 OD: 8"1203mm1
�- product without charge for either Specular Reflector
replacement parts or labor during such 404C=Specular Clear �� Coilex Regressed Eyeball
time.This does not include labor to 404H=Haze 420P=61ack Baffle,White Eyeball
remove or install fixtures.This warranty 404SN=Satin Nickel 420 420P6=61ack Baffle,Polished Brass Eyeball
is extended only to[he original � 404AC=Antique Copper 420W=Whi[e Baffle,White Eyeball
� purchaser of the product.A purchasers 404TBZ=Tuscan Bronze OD: 7 1/4"1184mm)
receipt or other proof of date of original 404RG=Residential Gold
purchase acceptable to the Company is OD: 7 1/4"1184mm1
�' required before warranty performance Eyeball
Specular Reflector
shall be rendered.This warranty only � ERT704=High Gloss Appliance White Trim
405SC=Specular Clear
covers product failure due to defects in ER7704 Ring w/White Eyeball
� materials or workmanship which occurs 405H=Haze ERT704P6=Polished Brass Trim w/Polished
405RG=Residential Gold
in normal use.It does not cover the bulb 405 Brass Eyeball
or failure of product caused by accident, 405CG=Champagne Gold DIFFUSERS OD: 8"(203mm)
�� OD: 7 1/4"(184mm)
misuse,abuse,lack of reasonable care,
alteration,or faulty installation, �� Drop Opal Lens-Glass
�� subjecting the product to any but[he White Cone Reflector-AIR-TITE'"' 771p=White Trim Ring
specified electrical service or any other � ERT712=White Reflector Cone,High Gloss 171PS=White Trim Ring Shower Light
failure not resulting from defects in Appliance White ��� OD: 8"(203mm)
�a materia�s or workmanship.Damage to ERT712
the product caused by separately ERT712TS=White Reflector Cone,High
� purchased,non-Company supplied Gloss Appliance White w/ �
Torsion Springs Dome Lens-Glass
components or bulbs,and corrosion or 172PS=White Trim Ring,Shower Light
discoloration of components are not OD: 7 7/4"(784mm) 172ACS=Antique Copper Trim Ring,
� covered by this warranty.There are no 772 Shower Light
above.s warranties except as described BAFFLES Supe�Trim-AIR-TITE'"' 172SNS=Satin Nickel Trim Ring,
`„ THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE 30PAT=Black Baffle Shower Light
172TBZS=Tuscan Bronze Trim Ring,
FOR INCIDENTAL,SPECIAL OR 30WAT=White Baffle Shower Light
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES 30WATH=White Baffle,Clear Reflector OD: 7 3/4"(197mm1
- RESULTING FROMTHE USE OFTHE 30 30SNAT=Satin Nickel,Air-Tite
PRODUCT OR ARISWG OUT OF ANY 30ACAT=Antique Copper,Air-Tite
BREACH OFTHIS WARRANTY.ALL 30TBZAT=Tuscan Bronze,Air-Tite ' � Baffle Wall Wash
� IMPLIED WARRANTIES,IF ANY, OD: 7 1/4"1184mm1 430P=61ack Baffle,White Scoop,White
430 Trim Ring
�� INCLUDING IMPLIED WARRANTS OF 430W=White Baffle,White Scoop,White
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A Full Cone Metal Baffle-AIR-TITE'"' Trim Ring
PARTICULAfl PURPOSE,ARE LIMITED IN ERT713=61ack Metal Baffle,High Gloss OD: 7 1/4"1184mm1
(, DURATIONTOTHE DURATION OFTHIS Appliance White Trim Ring w/
EXPRESS WARRANTY.Some states do Friction clips
� not allow the exclusion or limitation of ERT713 ERT713WHT=White Meta�Baffle,High
incidental or consequential damages,or Gloss Appliance White w/
limitations on how long an implied
warranty lasts,so the above exclusions Friction clips
orlimitationsmaynotapplytoyou.No ERT713TS=BIackMetalBaff�e,HighGloss Accesso►ies (Order SeparatCly)
� other warranty,written or verbal,is Appliance White Trim Ring w/
authorized by the Company.This Torsion Springs
warranty gives you specific legal rights, ERT713WHTTS=White Metal Baffle,
� and you may also have other rights High Gloss Appliance
which vary from state to state.To obtain White w/Torsion Springs
� warranty service,please write to Cooper �,
Lighting,1121 Highway 74 Sou[h, OD: 7 7/4"(184mm1 Lamp: }
Compact Fluorescent lamps,GZ16q base � �7
Peachtree City Georgia 30269.Enclose Z216=16 Watt,910 Lumens:CF16TW/E/GZ16q/827/LS lamp � ���'�
� product model number and problems ��
Full Cone Metal Baffle-AIR-TITETM Z227=21 Watt,1225 Lumens:CF21TW/E/GZ16q/827/LS lamp ,`','r
you are experiencing,along with address (Taller height than ERT773 for deeper lamp 7228=28 Watt,1675 Lumens:CF28TW/E/GZ16q/827/LS lamp '�' �
� and telephone number.You will then be ERT713L regression) �
contacted with a solution or a Retum ERT773L=61ack Metal Baffle,High Gloss MetalTrim Rings
Goods Authorization number and full Appliance White Trim Ring w/ Compatible with 404 and 405 trims
� instructions for returning the product.All Friction clips TRM6P=White Metai
returned products must be accompanied ERT713LTS=BIack Metal Baffle,High Gloss TRM6PB=Polished Brass
�, by a Retum Goods Authorization Appliance White Trim Ring TRM6C=Chrome
Number issued by the Company and w(Torsion Springs TRM6M6=B�ack Metal
must be returned freight prepaid.Any TRM6SN=Satin Nickel
� product received withou[a Return Goods OD: 7 1/4"1184mm) TRM6TB2=Tuscon Bronze
Au[horization Number from the TRP7MB=Black Piastic
Company will be refused.Cooper
� Lighting is not responsible for
merchandise damaged in transit. OversizeTrim Rings
Repaired or replaced produc[s shall be For use when ceiling opening is cut too large.OT403P is
�n subject to the terms of this warranty and compatible with 404 and 405 trims.For other trims OT400P or
are inspec[ed when packed.Evident or 0T403P may be placed behind existing Irim ring to hide cut-out
� concealed damage that is made in trensit irregularities.
should be reported at once to the carrier OT400P=9 1/4"White Metal
�. making the delivery and a claim fi�ed
0T403P=8"White Plastic
with them.
�,� / Note:Specifications and Dimensions subjec[to change without notice.
/�/�/�� Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com
YVVriR Lighting Customer First Center 7121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City,GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770 486.4801
�$, Cooper Lighting 5925 McLaughlin Rd.Mississauga,Ontario,Canada LSR 1 BS 905.50Z4000 FAX 905.568.7049
�
�
�
� CFL Lamps for C Fixture
�. �
� � �'� 1 1 1 1 . '
� � � � . � • . �
�
� �
� •
�
� �
� �
� • SYLVANIA exclusive CfL phosphor • Sustainable packaging
�� � formulation provides enhanced . <1.5 mg of inercury
� � �� "'� rendition of the strong red color(CIE lowest in market
� R9)generating richer,warmer,redder
/ BYlVANfA color tones • Small form factor
� � • Energy saving alternative to incandes- smallest in market
� S���pN" cent lamps saves up to 75%energy • Available in 13,20 and 23 Watts
compared to similar lumen output • 2700K color temperature
� � �� .n incandescent • g2 CRI
i ���� 4'
�"" �$ ° • Long life:12,000 hour average . T2 tube diameter
� ��� � �� ratetl life
Full spiral technology
� ���s., • Ricker-free starting • Instant On
�" ` • TCLP compliant
� ��� ��
• ENERGY STAR�qualified(13W only)
� _
� F co�oc ic
� SYLVANIA introduces a new family of compact fluorescent lamps with
enhanced phosphor technology.These new micro-mini Twist lamps not � ' ' � � '
� only have all benefits of the standard micro-mini product(instant on,
� low levels of inercury<1.5mg,small form factor)they are also designed Lamp Type Wattage
Micro Mini Twist 13W,20W,23W
to provide improved rendering of warm tones and strong red colors.The
� impact of this improved color pertormance is not reflectetl in the Color
� Rentlering Index(CRI).That metric does not include rentlering of strong
red colors.Truly with Living Spaces enhanced warm tone rendering...
�/� THIS IS NOT YOUR ORDINARY COMPACT FLUORESCENT LAMP!
�'" Living Spaces by SYLVANIA;your COZY,COMFORTABLE LIGHTING`".
�-
� � � � � � �
� Applications Application Notes
� Hospitality(hotels,restaurants) 1. Do not install on dimming circuits or in outtloor applications
(�' Healthcare(hospitals,assisted living) 2. Do not use in emergency exit fixtures or lights
" Residential 3. Do not use on electronic timers,photocells,lighted switches or any other switches that do not meet
� Property management UL20 Sec.7.6.15
C Retail(lighting showrooms, 4. Meets CSA,FCC and UL requirements
floor displays) 5. Use only 120V AC,60Hz circuit
� 6. Install and remove lamp from fixture by grasping plastic base,not lamp glass
� 7. Best performance achievetl when operated at 77°F/25°C
� SEE THE WORLD IN A NEW LIGHT SYLVAN/A
� Cf049 11/08
�.
�
�
� CFL Lamps for C Fixture
� �• � �
�
Catalog# Type
� Project
�a Comments
� Preparetl by Date
�
1 � : � i , �
�, . ;t
Average
� Item Ordering Bulb Nominal Incandescent Initial Color Rated Energy
Number Abbreviation Pkg. Type Wattage Wattage Lumens Temp. CRI Life(hrs.) Star
�� 29972 CF13EL/MICRO/827/LS/RP2 2/box,6/cs micro-mini 13 60 800 2700K 82 12,000 ✓
29973 CF20EUMICRO/827/LS/RP2 2/box,6/cs micro-mini 20 75 1200 2700K 82 12,000
� 29974 CF23EUMICRO/827/LS/RP2 2/box,6/cs micro-mini 23 100 1400 2700K 82 12,000
�
�. . i i � . � —.�
� Compact Fluorescent Similar Incandescent Watts Energy* CFL Life vs.
� DULUX�EL Lumens Life Incandescent Lumens Life Saved Savings Incandescent
CFI3EUMICRO/LS 800 12,000 60A/W 850 1000 47 $47 10 x
CF20EUMICRO/LS 1200 12,000 75A/W 1170 750 56 $56 13 x
�- CF23EUMICRO/LS 1400 12,000 100A/W 1690 750 77 $77 13 x
� �Energy savings over life of DULUX EL lamp at$0.10/kWh
�
� i 1 i
� �A) (B) (�) I' B `I
MOL(in.) Diameter(in.) Base Width(in.) I�—'�
� CF13EL/MICRO/LS 3.85 1.53 1.66
CF20EUMICRO/LS 4.29 2.02 2.14
� CF23EUMICRO/LS 4.45 2.02 2.14
�
A
�c
E =
�- �'I
�..
� , ,
�
� Typical Fluorescent Lamp Mortality Lumen Maintenance Curve
� 100 100
� I �
� 90 ._....:_ +--. �i. __.1_ .. . ' __._ _..__ _ ....
i 95 _ __. _ t �---
80 —� !_-- Z 90 __ __ _ _' , .;
� z 70 � 85 --- _
� � �. �
� � 60 0 80 ___.__ �__ . ,__.._._ _. .. ..
� 50 Q 75 �
� Z 40 Z 70 ........... '
w _._... .........
U
� °C 30 U 65
a ¢
20 a 60 ,
�� 10 --- —-- -- — —-� --, 55 �_ ___ , . , �
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 70 ' �
�- 0 � 50
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 00 8000 9000 10,000 12,000
� PERCENT RATED LIFE OPERATING HOURS
�
0
•
-
�
�` CFL Lamps for C Fixtures�
�
� � � •�
�
�
Living Spaces 2700K
�
� o.,e
� 0.16
0.16
�a N
a°E o.iz
� mo
U O 0.1
� a�
�p_ 0.08
� NE
�� 0.06
� O
Z
O.Od
� 0.02
� 0
�`'° a°° b5° c�° 5h° 60° �° .�o° �5° 00°
� WAVELENGTH (nm)
�
�
� Color Rendering Index(CRI)
� Color rentlering index(CRI)is a system derived from visual experi- CRi resc coiors
�" ments.It assesses the impact of different light sources on the per-
ceived color of objects antl surfaces.The first step is to determine the RZ � ■
� color temperature of the light source being rated.Next,each of eight
� f
� standard color samples is illuminated—first by the light source and Rs R6 R�
then by a light from a black body matched to the same color tempera-
� ture.If none of the samples changes in color appearance,the light
�" source is given a CRI rating of 100.Any changes in color appearance
`" which do occur result in a lower rating.The CRI decreases as the aver-
tage change in the color appearance of the eight samples increases.
Any CRI rating of 80 or above is normally considered high and indicates
� that the source has good color properties.
� �.v,
The Color Rendering Index(CRI)is generated by using the 8 sample f -"'`
� colors(R1 thru R8),which are then averaged together to produce the
rated CRI for the light source.In additional to the 8 colors used in the � '
� CRI measurement there are also 6 adtlitional special colors(R9 thru
� R14)which are not incorporated in the CRI index.As can be seen
from the chart below Living Spaces(Red Line)significantly increases
`" the amount of R9 as compared to stantlard Compact Fluorescent
� Lamps(Blue Line).The R9,Strong Red,color produces richer,warmer,
redder color tones.It is this enhancement of the R9 color that makes
� - Living Spaces
Living Spaces such a unique product.Truly,Living Spaces is not your - Standard CFL
� ortlinary CFL.
�
�
�
� � � • � � • ■
� CF 13 EL / MICRO / 827 / LS / RP2
Compact Wattage: Electronic Bulb Type: 8=82 CRI Living RP=Retaii Pack
t'° Fluorescent 13 watts Ballast Micro Mini 27=2700K Spaces 2 per pack
�M
�.
�
.
�.
� CFL Lamps for C Fixtures
� . , .
� SYLVAN/A . 1 _ , ,. ,. .
� � LI NG Lamps shall be a DULUX EL Micro-Mini Twist
for Living Spaces having a T2 diameter(13,20
� or 23W).Lamp shall have a correlated color
T�+ temperature 2700K and a CRI of 82.
�
� Cv� ��W�'-,^��_��,�, Lamps shall be designed with enhanced phos-
�v��tL�W phor technology for improved color rendition.
� ...�;
- � �'�� ' ���� ��� Average rated lamp life shall be 12,000 hours.
� � � �'>i Lamp MOL shall not exceed 3.85"(13W),4.29"
� l (20W)antl 4.45"(23W�.
• `� . � Lamps shall be TCLP Compliant
�. -..�� : ��.""'_.` �,�'
v
�
� .�m��
\/! �+ a
�1 �j:
� �� .� � �. . ...
u;,
(, CFL Bulbs Bombil�a �� � . ,,
� � ;YLVr':
� __ __ �
c LI NG
� �
� ����.��
� ,� �� �
� ,� . �
� , _�_ .-_
�e �.v� Q�
� •, - ''` OSRAM SYWANIA
♦ I CF�BU��Bt�ITlbl� , National Customer
♦-
I `°""`�°°•��t< Service and Sales Center
18725 N.Union Street
� Westfield,IN 46074 USA �
Industrial Commercial �
�4 Phone: 1-800-255-5042 ��
�" Fax: 1-800-255-5043 (�
NationalAccounts °
� Phane: 1-800-562-4671
�" Fax: 1-800-562-4674 0
�� a
OEM/Special Markets
(„ Phone: 1-800-762-7191 �
Fax: 1-800-762-7192 �
a
Display/Optic �
t" Phone: 1-888-677-2627 �
Fax: 1-800-762-7192 �
�~ In Canada �
� OSRAM SYLVANIA LTD o
Headquarters o
2001 Drew Roatl
Mississauga,ON L5S 1S4
� Industrial Commercial
� Phone: 1-800-263-2852
Fax: 1-800-667-6772
� Special Markets
Phone: 1-800-265-2852
� Fax: 1-800-667-6772
� Visit our website:www.sylvania.com
� SYWANIA is a registered trademark of OSRAM SYWANIA Inc.
ENERGY STAR is a registeretl trademark of the U.S.Environmental Protec[ion Agency
�-
�
l;
I, FIXTURE D
�
� JUt10 4" VERTICAL IC COMPACT
� P��;eC►: FLUORESCENT HOUSING
� Fixture Type:
� 26W COMPACT FLUORESCENT LAMP
Location:
� Contact/Phone: ICPL426E, ICPL426EN
� ��
�= PRODUCT DESCRIPTION DIMENSIONS �
� ICPL Energy Star,Air-Loc°new construction housing•Can be �
� completely covered with insulation• Energy efficient sealed
housing does not require separate ALG gasket•Air-Loc housing
� stops infiltration and exfiltration of air,reducing heating and
cooling costs•Easy access ballast•2 year warranty.
� PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS
Lamp One 26W triple tube(4-pin)CFL lamp.
� 7 3/4"
Socket Fixed mounted socket attaches to top of housing. % �
� Ballast 120V HPF or NPF Rapid Start Electronic with endof-life �
� lamp protection •Optional dimming ballast available•UL �
listed/CSA certified •Mounted inside housing on a removable J- _
box cover for ease of maintenance.
� Trims Trim selection shown on reverse.Trim gasket provided with
� housing.
� Labels Energy Star qualified•UL listed for through-branch wiring
and damp locations•Meets Washington State Air Tight
� Requirements,IECC•Complies with FCC Part 18 consumer use _ _
limits•Product mechanically protected against improper use of O
lamps• Union made AFL-CIO• UL and C-UL Listed•Complies • �3��2
� with California's Title 24 energy code•Trims 1 1, 12,4101 and 9��8 Will expand
� ° to 2s"
� 4102 are wet location approved for covered ceiling applications. . O (Reduces to 9 1/8"
Testing All reports are based on published industry procedures; _ with breakaway
feature)
� field performance may differ from laboratory performance.
Product specifications subject to change without notice.
C INSTALLATION
GReal Nail°3 Bar Hangers Telescoping,patented Real Nailm 3 - is v2° -_
p�' system permits quick placement of housing anywhere within -- - �g�/2"
�I` 24"O.C.joists or suspended ceilings• Integral T-bar notch and
� clip secures housing in suspended ceiling grid-no accessory clips
required •24"expansion stop allows quick placement of fixture in 4 1/2" CEILING CUTOUT
�{ standard grid spacing•Bars scored in two locations for fast,
clean breaking,allowing housing installation in tight applications
� •Bar hangers may be repositioned 90°•Bars captive to PRODUCT CODES
mounting frame•Edge-mounted for extra strength•Captive
� bugle-headed ring shank nail for quick one-step installation and Catalog Number Inpuf Voltage Lamp Rating(max.) Bollast
� easy removal with claw hammer for fixture relocation•Quick-Loc ��p�,qZ6E 120V 26W Triple Tube(4pin)CF� HPF
slot and oversized locking set screw lock fixture in position
•Bar hanger foot contoured to align to bottom of construction joist �CPL426EN 120V 26W Triple Tube(4{�in)CFL NPF
� •Alternate mounting holes included. ICPL426EN-DB120 120V 26WTripleTu6e(4-pin)CFl NPF
� Junction Box Prewired junction box provided with(6)'/2"and This producf is Energy Sfar qualified and T24 tompliant
(1�'/<"knockouts, (4�Non-metallic sheathed cable connectors
� and ground wire,UL and C-UL Listed for through-branch wiring,
maximum(6)No. 12 AWG 90' C branch circuit conductors
� (3 in,3 out) •Junction box provided with removable access plate
�r •Knockouts equipped with pryout slots.
�v Mounfing Frame 22t�auge die-formed galvanized steel
mounting frame•Rough-in section(junction box,mounting frame,
� housing,ballast and bar hangers)fully assembled for ease of
� installation.
Housing Air-Loc IC housing,.032"aluminum •Access door for
� junction box accessibiliy•Removable inner housing is vertically •
adjustable to accommodate up to a 1"ceiling thickness. ��
� REV-3/10 °
� .lUNO LJGHiING GROUP
by SCMY/r EI�«ri.
�..
_
�
� PHOTOMETRICS Fixture D H2781CAT
�
�r Candlepower Distribution Candlepower Zonal Lumen Summary
� Test No.267p140 Deg. CD
� Zone Lumens %Lamp %Fixture
� H2781CAT-78P o z5a
0-30 238 14.2 26.8
� Eyeball-30°Tilt ic� 5 254 0-40 398 23.8 44.7
Lamp=28W i5 z�a o-so �ia a2.� 60.3
Lumens=1675 zs 2ea o-so aso 53.1 ioo.o
� Spacing 35 236 90-180 0 0.0 0.0
� Cflt0fl0�=l A � � 45 201 0-180 890 53.1 100.0
zuo- 55 160
Efficiency=53.1% se ss
�, � 75 48
85 15
� 90 0
�oo - �
�.
� Cone of Light- 0° Horizontal Cone of Light- 30° Horizontal Cone of Light- 30°Vertical
Distance to Initial Nadir Beam Distance to Initial Nadir Beam Distance to Initial Nadir Beam
��� Illuminated Footcandles Diameter Illuminated Footcandles Diameter Illuminated Footcandles Diameter
Plane ■ Plane � L W CB Plane � L W CB
F
�� 5'S° /�9�` 8' 5'5" 10 6.6 Z3 3.2 2'0" 42 2.1 2.9 3.5
-__._
�"' 7'0' 5 10.4' 7'0" 6 8.4 9,4 4 3'0" 19 3.2 4.3 5.2
--- ---.__.._--
r- 8'0" 4 11.5' 8'0' 5 9.7 10.7 4.6 4'0" 10 4.3 5J 6.9
� 9'0" 3 �� 12.9' 9'0' 4 10.9 12 5.2 5'0" 7 5.3 7.2 8.7
10'0" /� 3 14.3' 10'0" 3 12.1 13.4 5.8 6'0" 5 6.4 S.6 70.4
��� Beam diameter is to 50%of maximum foot- Beam diameter is to 50%of maximum foot- Beam diameter is to 50%of maximum foot-
candles,rounded to the nearest half-foot. candies,rounded to the nearest half-foot. candles,rounded to the neares[half-foot.
Footcandle values are initial,apply appropriate Footcandle values are initial,apply appropriate Footcandle values are initial,apply appropriate
� light loss factors where necessary. light loss factors where necessary. light loss factors where necessary.
C
I' Candlepower Distribution Candlepower Zonal Lumen Summary Cone of Light- 0° Horizontal
1r
TBStN0.267p143 �� Deg. CD Distanceto InitialNadir Beam
� H2781CAT-404C Zone Lumens %Lamp %Fnture Illuminated Footcandles Diameter
0 320 0-30 386 23.0 2g.7 Plane ■
C Specular Reflector 5 353 0-40 687 41.0 52.8 ?
Lamp=28W �5 aae o-so i2n �z.a sa.i s'S" j ia\ s'
Lumens=1675 z5 50� 0-90 i3oi ns t0o.0 �'o^ 8�` ti.a'
� Spacing 35 499 so-iao 0 0.0 0.o s'o^ s t3.r
� Criterion=1.9 as 3st o-�ao taot ns ioo.o s'o^ 5 ia.��
_�zo 55 257 10'0" � 4 � 76.4'
�" EffiCi2nCy=77.6% 65 $2 Beam diameter is m 50%of maximum foot-
75 2 candles,rounded to the nearest half-foot.
� 85 1 Footcandle values are initial,apply appropriate
90 0 light loss factors where necessary.
aso
�
�
Candlepower Distribution Candlepower Zonal Lumen Summary Cone of Light- 0° Horizontal
��� Test No.267p145 Deg. CD Distanceto Initial Nadir Beam
� 2one Lumens %Lamp %Fixture Illuminated Footcandles Diameter
H2781CAT-172PS o 26a v�ane
0-30 210 12.5 20.6
WhiteTrim w/ so 5 264 0-40 350 20.9 34A � `�
�j Frosted Glass Dome, is 2ss o-so s5s 3s.a sa.� s�s• � s� zs�
Wet Location Listed 2s 2a3
Lamp=28W o-so ioia so.s too.o �'o^ 5 9.3'
�, 35 224 90-160 0 0.0 0.0 8'0" 4 10.6'
Lumens=1675 a5 200 0-180 1018 60.8 100.0 9'0" � 3 F 71.9'
� Spacing 180 55 174 10'0" / -_ 3 \ 13.3'
� Criterion=1.3 65 148 Beam diameter is to 50%of maximum foot-
75 117 candles,rounded to the nearest half-foot.
� Efficiency=60.8% ae 86 Footcandle values are initial,apply appropriate
90 0 light loss factors where necessary.
z�o
�
�
.
�
�
� / Note:Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice.
C��R LI htin Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com
� 9 g Customer First Center 7121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City,GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770 486.4801
Cooper Lighting 5925 McLaughlin Rd.Mississauga,Ontario,Canada L5R 1 BS 905.507.4000 FAX 905.568.7049
�
�
� ' Bath and Wall
�
�
�y � �
�" � �,
v Y � � �
� � � � � � Y
X � � � o � ° ° �
� '^ �, > � .�
� v a, v -o v a, .�
� N � � � .� r6 T N � �
W � � O � � o � N
� � � � � v � � � � � _ �
� o Q � v m `� � o` = o
� � -O � M � �
c v d
�, � O O _/ C Y T � � �
QJ � C � C v. � � e
�- � o s o 0
� � � v � � u� �� M � —
�i = -o -� = M � a a m � Y ��
\Ir. '�., °' � � � o m o � � � �
_o � � � � � N � � �
� O � 6 . � c .- C
� O
� � vvi O � N ( � � Q � �
f6 C Q ��/�
� � � X � � v= V 1 m 1 V1
� � � � _
� � d in C � � � O-�
�� � � N t6 'Q � � v O � �
� � �
� — .� � l7 � � Q m v o z ° m o a�,
X �
V �
� � �� � O O � �
O
� � co m X � _'k v 0 `6�
U N - �.i. >.
� \ � � v N QJ `-' -� p V c � C
5 0 � a' � `, °E E N c, Q o
� � � °.,o —° � a
��, �L � � � M O �� �T � O O
�//"" O � X V � � � �' i 2 d
� � dJ C fB � Y V
�
� �
� C
s
m .
�- J C
J �
J"� m N
J V
� Y�O
�. � C
�j
v O
� � ��
�
� ��3
� � �
� , � C
� �
�,. .__ °. � �O
f0 `p_
� = �
L�
� Q 7
� O
p��
� _ d
��
C O
�
� t C
�O
J'}.
� J V
O]�-
J�
= V
N �
� r a
F �
a m
� c
>L
ai v
� -� N O
•
r�
�n �O7
�1- - N
� Q L
_.. . .: . �.,. '* �>
• C �
r �
m�
F J �
• ..... .. � � ..... _ J
.._. ry� __._..___ -_ m.�
^�m J L
� � '' �\ � �
f I
!. �J
E ' N J
• � E O m
� � ��� 5�F
�r �
�
�
!M' FIXTURE G
f� SA-1_T5 Series
� nu � ii__�� cTM
� � Project Name:
� Type: Date:
�r ��� �
�� Catalog #:
� ` �,� �`'�.,f�'
� Description:
� �`` � The Nulite SA narrow strip is a specification grade luminaire with
�" � multiple reflector options.This luminaire is ideal for commercial,
retail and industrial applications.
� (RASY)
"" �� 5�8��• .� Specifications:
� . 3-3/4° Construction: Die formed 20 gauge cold rolled steel with 16
� 2-3i8" ' au e cold rolled steel end ca s and 7/8"KOs for eas wirin
1-1/2�� 9 9 P Y 9�
�„ : . . The housing is finished in high reflectance white baked polyester
� �i-ii2"� 1-9/i6°� powder coat paint after fabrication.Optional aluminum housing.
� (FRS Option) Reflector/ Ballast: Reflector / ballast cover is finished with
� (ASY) (SYM) �, high reflectance white baked polyester powder coat paint after
• ' - `� fabrication. Consult factory for custom reflectors. Standard
�` 3�. electronic, class P, ballast. Universal (UNV) voltage ballast is
�, 2-3is" t�o� from 120 to 277V.
�
� Lam in 1 lam cross-section T5 or T5H0. Nominal 6' or 8'
� 2-5/16" 3-1/8" p g� p
�' housing is a tandem lamp configuration. Luminaire can be
� ordered with lamps, consult factory.
Length Wattage
� 22-1/2" 14T5,24T5H0 Mounting: Surface.
� 34-3/8" 21T5,39T5H0 Labels: UL/cUL listed. Damp location is optional.
� 46-1/8" 28T5,54T5H0
68-3/4" 21T5-6,39T5H0-6
� 92-3/16" 28T5-8,54T5H0-8
�
� Ordering Information
�, Sample: SA-154T5H0-UNV-PSN-SYM
� Series Lamp Wattage Voltage Ballast Options
SA 1
� T5lT5H0 Ballast Factor
14T5 UNV PS�sta�dard� N No�ma� EMZ Emergency SYM Symmetrical Reflector
� 24T5H0 ProgramStart Battery Pack
21T5 120 HEPS' ASY Asymmetrical Reflector
��, HighEfficiency AL Aluminum
39T5H0 277 ProgramStart Housing
� 28T5 All Lam �immin o tions RASY Reverse Asymmetrical
� 54T5H0
347' DIM� Dimming DL Damp Location Reflector
SD�Step Dimming WG3 Wire uard
�"' 21 T5-6 480� g QW Quick Through Wiring for
39T5H0-6 Continuous Row Applications
� GLR Fusing
28T5-8
� 54T5H0-8 FRS Frosted Snap-on Lens
�
Notes:
� 1.Consult Factory.
� 2.Emergency battery pack is not available for nominal 2'unit;consult factory for 3'unit.Specific voliage must be ordered for this option.
3. Wireguard is not available with all reflectors,consult factory.
� Specifications and dimensions are subject to change without notification.Specification sheets on our website supersede all other versions. 2010 Rev. B
Nulite reserves the right to bulk package any order.
� Nulite Lighting 10770 East 51 st Avenue,Denver,CO 80239 Phone 303-287-9646 Fax 303-287-0316 www.nulite-lighting.com
�
i
� -
�, �;�s•� �� �_H �=I><TU f�E
�,.�..
� STANDARD, HIGH, SUPER HIGH
C LUMINOSITY
C
C Tape Light ,��,�,:�� �:
�"
�
�
� �
� ��� t: f
� � � \I� � ��' � .
� � ! � ,'
�w T300WW THL480WW TSHL600WW � � �"�
�r �, �� � �� �� �
�
/► MODELS STANDARD LUMINOSITY HIGH LUMINOSITY SUPER HIGH LUMINOSITY
�w
� warn��v✓hite ±30(,id. O T300WW O THL480WW O TSHL600WW
�' '� ' O T300CW O THL480CW O TSHL600CW
� � T300R � THL480R � TSHL600R
• � � T300G � THL480G � TSHL600G
� blue � T300B � THL4808 � TSHL6006
arnber � T300A � THL480A � TSHL600A
�v LEDS PER REEL ���;0 600
� LENGTH �6 � �� t _���� � !�-���� ai;i�- �b�i per reel•custoiri available 16.4'perreel•cuslom available
� LUMEN OUTPUT 1000 per reel(WW) 1725 per reel(WW) 2750 per reel(WW)
61 per fooC 105 per toot 168 per foot
� WATTAGE 24W per reel 30W per reel 36W per reel
� 1.5W per foot 1.83W per foot 2.2W per foot
� CURRENT ?_amps 3amps 4amps
MAX RUN/driver 328 feet/10M 32.8 feet/10M 32.8 feetllOM
♦w VOLTAGE 12V DC 12V DC 12V DC
� CUTTABLE every 3 leds or 2" every 3 leds or 1.25" every 3 leds or 1"
� EW NG AN�GLE � W�0.094°H 0.31"W•Q094"H 0.31"W•0.094"H
� 120` 120'
� CONNECTORS available for all configurations
� POWER SUPPLIES C�to 96 watt
� NOTE lumen specifications are for warm white only
FEATURES •flexible for versatile designs•even illumination•slim profile•dimmable•available in custom lengths with plug-
�"' n-play connectors•easy mounting with double sided tape•mounts to wood.steel or metal&most hard smooth
�rfaoe�•���i�.rt= ,.,'v;;rsi.m.,avail�f,l�• �n�� c �,rgY co�t�•50 pU0 hr,urs•mel!it�nance fi�� n'�hult.s�n Durnr,ut
• R(.JHS C;r;�r7�ii�,arii
• � ' s • • ' •. • � .�' �•
O OO ' �- OO ' OO
�
�" 1 2VPLUG � P36W12V P72W12V
6W-12V LU
24W 1
� Ei w�H+t cii-�;,I ;. , a � � �'i : � ��1���:: � uy-in�'.n�.�r evilh 36��Natt plug in c1n✓ci �.'I� , %?watt plug in drivei u=��
eord length c,f 1 U. � a cord lengih oi 10'. combined cord length oi 1��. combined cord length of 8�8".
• 4 25"L x 21?5'W x 125'H 5.125'L x 225'W x 1.25"H
� , LEiJt '.t�Fi�iNGitvi;.C;C)t�
•
•
r
�
� u
� g H FIXTURE
C
� ;`
I��' �'�°� � �
l,
�
1� -�
I'
• • • . . -
�, •
� all connectors available with custom wire lead lengths i
� A w � I� - �
� ���� , �
�"' ��� , � �_ � IDIMDRIVER60W
��" A dimmable 60W LED driver(pov�ar
� TCONNECT , i,,F�L(CE supply)for use with magnetic low
�I ',i.� r_,ni ii �'i . I S 7i �I��� t,i r �, !., ��,.
� I voltage waii dimmer,hard wire,
��� 11 , a .,C� , c"� , i .1 : ��
� ,f� I multitap input 120-277V and 12V
�ecify length or 24V output.Note:Lutron Maestro
�" � series is not compatible.Length is
� 6.93"with mounting bracket.
� /�� 3"W x 4.9"L x 3.75"D
i� � I
• TYCONNECT �
� � Sii��I +,��e� �� �r �� ' ��two ' • • • • •
lape connecturs witfi 3 b 12" 24" TDIMMER-12V
� or 36"wire lead specify length
Inline 1?V diininE i 9h�N n���x
� a dri��r��; u� _+ �
� �� . � , , ��H
� E N E R G�I ' I — SILICONE COVER(SC)
TCORNER � ��pe ligh(canpletely sealed in clear
� I eo neCtor�with 3"r6'(11� 24� 36" I : ' ' �h�rri�c�,o��i li✓�!) i!�I
� ���� � ur 6)'wlre I�ad specify length � TDIMMER-12V WM-RF
C I E N �.������ ,�����������r������ ��r��cs5 ,�
� �� � �RF)Decora switch for installation � �
� � �� in standard switch box,96W max. RESIN DIPPED(RD)
�driver is required. (��in act resin coatin conforr�iinc
� TPWRCONNECT- 4.5'L r.225'W x 1.5'H p g �
Ta e conn�c� t �I � closely to slze of tape light.
P �'�' ���I�I"�v ri'�1 W x 0.�9c3"H
� connector with 3 6" 12 24' 36" � �
or 60"wire In��i specify length
• I � :� i .-
• ��
�
• � TDIMMER-I2V-WM-HW SOLID SILICONE(SS)
TYPWRCONNECT-_ Inline 12V dimmer�r��tl•�I���nrd�n:ir� Totally waterproof,UV reslstant
� Sinyle power conneclur to twaway Decora switch for installation In and suitable for outdoor applicalion.
splii tape connectors with 3".6" standard switch box,96W max. 0.51 W x 0.23"H
� 12" 24"or 36"wire lead specify a drlver Is required.
length. 4.5'L x 225"W x 1.5"H
�
i
� � ' • ► � • �
O � O ,�.� \ O .
� � � ,. --- �'. �
� P96W12V P30WHW12V , i P60WHW12V P96WHW12V
� 96 watt plug-in driver; i e�, �0��,�ati hai�i-:��u� ��.r�,:�tn an£5� 6U�ti tlt I�iar�i-,i, .,i.�-r ,' .�� ':; � ��f�..a�t!i�i�� , I�,vci,�ill ni cs
6 lead on both ends wate �
� ed cord length of 8'8'�. rproof(IP66). lead on both ends waterproof QP66). lead on both ends waterproof QP66)_
Combin L x 225"W x 1 A4"H 9-1"L x 1 43"W x 1-06"H 9.44"L x 267"W x 1.73"H 8.07"L x 4.98"W x 2.2"H
• LED lighting��� .?2.4880•LEDLtGHTINGINC.COM ,
•
�
`
� Troy-CSL Lighting Inc. :: OnLine Store Pa e 1 of 1
, g
FIXTURE I
�
� You are at � Under Cabine[� CounterA[[ack I Xenon
�. �
�
• .� �
� � 5
�
� • 8 inch Xenon - ��,-� �
NCAX-120-8 NCAX-120-16
....._.. . .. . _ ..._---_...
•
� ���.. �
� �..----"..
� 24 inch Xenon 32 inth Xenon
......._-------N C AX-1,20-24 ....._--��---....._.------N C AX-7 20-32
� --------__._....--------------
� � ��
� �.
�
• 40 inch Xenon
N C AX-120-40
------------ �-
------.___.
1 of 1P
•
•
•
•
•
�
•
�
•
�
•
•
i
�
•
•
i
•
!
!
•
•
•
�
� http://www.csllighting.com/contents/listCategariesAndProducts.asp?idCategory=78 6/18/2009
�r:
�
� r
.
i � ����g� ������°���,���a
Post Cff�ce..�v:z T�€37
� �agle���gado �163I
�:--
1�l��=�=�{97C) 32�-12�3 �ax
i'
���t�S��` �DB.�'i!a
���� %��flQ�fi��d���t�a ��
� 1����s��� t����x�d.Assc������s
� ��r�Tice-2Q�!���� 1 �°e�epir�cl�-24� ser��ice
� �_?�0�p��L,�? cir��i�h�azn� Iin.��a���1
i A.1I rccL�t��les�o ��t�n��ser prc�c�f
' Install arc� ��t�lt b�e�ke�s as�S�r N.�;.�', �;c�c�e
�.�i������` �1 i7�,�
,
; 1. R.a���� 2.. l�ryer
! 3. ��;��� �&. ���r
i 5. I.�vir�� Roc��� ���. b. �����r
` 7. �,ivin�R.c�o�z��Z:.�. �. �,�t�e�-stc�ra�;�/.�ech,
9. L3i��ir��;�$c�c�na�2e�. 1�. L��as��e.r :>
` 11, I�itch/��n. �,t�• �?. �ntr,y L,i�ia�in�
�
1�. Pc}�vc��r�c��z�fLiar 1�. ���'rx��ratc�r
1 S. �,'_rtckser� 5��.�.���. �b. ��s�«�ashe.r
` �i. �itch�r� �r�.��a��. l�. �a�pas��
�
19. M;�rt���a�v� 2�. �u�.st Becir��n� �ast
; 21. �-�c�a� 22, Cpa.���t�edr��� �es�
� 23. ��ti��c Pou=�ier C�F� ?�. �u�s��att��i��tin�,�-I�11
; 2S, �!�a�tv���a���I�s�t ?b. �fa�t�r Bedre�o�n
i 27e �'�-��ak�r�..ivi�����•e� ?�. ��ia..st�r�a�l�s �'��'�
� 29. C`:?r��ak��-5��. �{}, ����t�ker
� =�1, �a���a.1�er S(1� 32. C�retak�r
33. �:aa•efi�ker��=e� 3�. �a�t�/�at�1�e�1�,��l�atit��
; 3�. F �s��t�4��r�Jve�€ � 3�. �:a��c;ta��� �,i°��?a��,4r�a
; ';,���6 4 ..,, �
� �'�'���������� e ��'�-=
� v����.1
` �c�te� �
� ��,�;
���e� ��_�_�___��
I
t . . .
C� � _ .
�
������ ������������4
��5� c�tte��.�%����
Eag9e�-�1"���`ada �1631
�h>E3t���97(3) 328-i2�3 Fax
�J�2(�� �II��1���
�.�5� ���d�t���Rd, �6
I�'Ii�h�a���a���°s���s�eia���
�,����`���ITIdA"�"I�)�
�80(� �c�. �t.___�s_5400
�-�1�,.cia����its____.._..{�00�
�arag�; �a��#ak�:r____o�0�{�
��ii1��_____m__�(j(}(�'
���--___--3'16��
�I't�'�'�`--__°_--7��{�
�ar2S�2c'�'-__---�3E�1�
��,.���
�� �Q�11�(CdJ, ��U°/�v—___��.����
3�,30€�
>1.3 X�.�� 1�00-___��,�20
=�7,52C�.i`.2�€?=93
' � � Hepworth-Pawlak Cieotechnical,Inc.
� � 5020 County Road 1�4
��/�\/��� Glenwood Springs,Colorado 81601
`�� Phune: 970-945-7988
HEPW06:TH-F,�,�VLAK GEOTECHNICAL F�lX:970-945-�454
November 12, 2010 ��>>,,��1: �,�,,,�„�a�,�,u�,�r����,�,,�„
Joel and Jane Gros
P.O. Box 2796
Vail, Colorado 81658
Job No. 410 196A
Subject: Observation of Exploratory Pits, Proposed Remodel, Eiger Chalet, Unit 6,
1350 Sandstone Drive, Vail, Colorado
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gros:
As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed
exploratory pits excavated at the subject site on November 10, 2010 to evaluate the soils
exposed for foundation support. The fmdings of our observations and recommendations
for the foundation design are presented in this report. The services were performed in
accordance with our agreement for professional engineering services to Joel and Jane
Gros, dated November 8; 2010.
E�sting Building Conditions: The existing building consists of a two story, wood
frame structure over a walkout lower level originally built around 1970. The upper level
cantilevers out 28 inches from the middle level. It appears that the north part of the lower
level had been converted to a finished basement area during a previous remodel and steps
up about 18 inches above the remaining lower floor level. The north foundation wall
appears to be of"board form" construction and may be wall-on-grade bearing. The
existing floor in the north part had been�removed.�� �' �� �
��J'�
A hot tub is located adjacent to the north foundation v a�`�the e�terior side. A boulder
wall retains the cut at the north side of a small level area a tAe north sid�of the building.
�f
Proposed Construction: The proposed remodel of the subject site will include new
foundations to support additions on the east and north sides of Unit 6. Two `Big Foot"
footing pads are proposed to support a new elevated wood deck at the southeast side of
the building. The middle living level is proposed to be extended north, in line with the
upper level, and a new continuous footing and stem wall (frost depth) is proposed to
support the building extension. We understand that helical piers are being considered for
support of the north building extension in order to reduce the amount of excavation and
site disturbance required to construct a spread footing foundation.
Field Observations: At the time of our visit to the site, remodel work was in progress
and an exploratory pit had been excavated by hand just off of the southeast corner of the
building in a gravel parking area adjacent to the building. The soils exposed in the pit,
below a thin layer of crushed rock, consisted of 1 foot of organic topsoil overlying
medium dense, silty to clayey sandy gravel with cobbles down to the bottom pit depth of
Parker 303-841-7119 � Colarado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silvertllorile 970-468-1989
, . � Joel and Jane Gros
November 12, 2010
Page 2
4 feet. In addition to that pit, we hand excavated a small pit at the toe of the steep cut
slope northeast of the parking area to augment our evaluation of the natural soil
conditions at the subject site. The soils exposed in the additional pit, below a shallow
depth of topsoil, consisted of granular soils similar to those observed in the first pit
excavated at the site. The results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of the
natural granular soils (minus 6 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on
Figure 1. No free water was encountered in the pits and the soils were generally moist.
We did not observe any foundation distress at the time of our site visit and we understand
that the building structure was in relatively good condition, considering its age, prior to
beginning the remodel. The soils exposed below the foundation in the north part of the
lower level were observed to be predominantly granular and relatively dry.
Conclusions and Recommendations: Considering the conditions exposed in the pits,
the existing bearing conditions exposed and the nature of the proposed construction,
spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soil designed for an allowable
soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf can be used for support of the proposed footings. The
exposed soils could tend to compress under load and result in some post-construction
settlement between the new footings and the existing foundation, possibly up to about 1
inch.
Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for
columns. Loose and disturbed soils and existing fill in footing areas should be removed
and the bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Based on our
observations, it is likely that the new north footing will be based in existing foundation
wall backfill, and we recommend that the new footing should extend down to the bearing
level of the existing foundation wall. The bearing soils should be protected against frost
and concrete should not be placed on frozen soils. Exterior footings should be provided
with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection.
As an alternative to spread footings, helical piers could be used to extend the bearing
level through the existing backfill and into natural bearing soils, however, there is some
risk that the piers may encounter cobbles and small boulders in the backfill and reach
penetration refusal short of their design installation depths and required torque. Helical
piers that bear in the backfill will have a risk of post-construction settlement.
Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies
such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as
retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an
equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for on-site predominantly granular soil as
backfill. A perimeter foundation drain should be provided (if not exposed during
construction) to prevent temporary buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the basement
wall and prevent wetting of the lower level.
Job No.410 196A
�'�E3HCPt@C�'1
�-.
. .- ,.., �
- - � . �� �� .�
.� '�������������������� '
��������.������������
�.������������������
�.�������������������
���������������������
���������������������
������w�������������
���������������������
����������������������
•� ��•����������������� •
��•�������������������
���������������������
���������������������
���������������������
���������������������
���������������������
������ ��������������
�������Z��������������
���������������������
:. ��������������������� �
���������������������
���������������������
���������������������
���������������������
����������������������
����������������������
���������������������
���������������������
���������������������
, ���`�����������������
���•����������������� '
���������������������
���'�����������������
�������������������
���`�����������������
���������������������
��������������������� �
���������������������
����������������������
.• ��������.��■����������� ..
����`����������������
��������������������
���������������������
��������������������� �
' ���������������������
� ���������������������
������a������������� �
�����w�������������
���������������������
, ������`�������������� .
��������������������
������►��������������
����������������������
�������'��������������
� �������`��������������
���������������������� �
�����������������������
� ����������������������
��������������������� •
� ��������������������� ..
���������������������
��������`�������������
��������������������
���������������������
���������������������
���������������������
��������������������
��������������������
����������������������
, ��������������������� •
���������������������
���������������������
�����w�������������
���������������������
���������������������
���������������������
���������������������
��������������������
, �����������.��������� :�
����������������������
���������������������
��������������������
��������������������
���������������������
��������������������
���������������������
���������������������
��������������������
, �������������������� ••
���������������������
��������������������
���������������������
��������������������
��������������������
��������������������
���������������������
�����w��������������
���������������������
�������������������� ��
• . , .•� .� � • - • � • �•• •� •�
� • ' •
��� ��' ��� •
' � • � � � .
� � � . �
' • • • - • • • •�• - '• • -• ' • --
, 1 •• ' I � � « . � � � � . .
�- •
,
. - r Joel and Jane Gros
November 12, 2010
Page 3
Structural fill placed within floor slab areas can consist of the on-site soils compacted to
at least 95% of standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill
placed around the structure should be compacted and the surface graded to prevent
ponding within at least 5 feet of the building.
The existing foundation conditions should be evaluated by a structural engineer.
Limitations: The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation
of the soils exposed within the pits excavated at the east side of the existing building and
observation of the soils exposed below the ground floor in the north part of the lower
level. The risk of foundation movement may be greater than indicated in this report
because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions encountered during excavation
for the proposed footings. In order to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the
subsurface conditions below the excavation, drilling or additional excavation would be
required. It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the
recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the
presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC)
developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in
this special field of practice should be consulted.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH— PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
��q� Fi E�/sl
a.��'.�� �'
,�=• ..9
Trevor L. Kne , �'.� �:
38469
Rev. by: SLP �'•. �i-�s-to :��
TLK/ O��SS�Ot�AI_E�C?�
. ...���.
Attachment Figure 1 — Gradation Test Results
Job No. 410 196A
GELPtCCh
� ,
11-29-2011 Inspection Request Reporting Page 2
4:17 pm Vail, CO _ Citv Of
Requested Inspect Date: Wednesday November 30 2011
Site Address: 1350 SANDS�TONE DR VAI�
EIGER CHALETS BLDG 1, UNIT 6
A/P/D Information
Activity: B11-0026 Type: COMBO Sub Type: AMF Status: ISSUED
Const Type: Occup ancy: Use: R-2 Insp Area:
Owner: JANE BARBARA GROS REVOCABLE TRUST-
JOEL JEAN PIERRE GROS REVOCABLE
TRUST
Contractor: GROS,JOEL Phone: 970-926-5458
Architect: MICHAEL HAZARD AIA Phone: 970-949-4958
Description: ADD 2 BALCONIES, STUCCO&WINDOWS
Requested Inspection(s)
Item: 90 BLDG-Final Requested Time: 09:00 AM
Requestor: GROS, JOEL Phone: 970-926-5458 -or- 970-390-
Comments: 390-1930 1930
Assigned To: ****""`."** . Entered By: JMONDRAGON K
Action: � �" Time Exp:
Item: 534 PLAN -FINAL C/O Requested Time: 08:30 AM
R'equestor: GROS,JOEL Phone: 970-926-5458 -or- 970-390-
Comments: 390-4930 1930
Assigned To: BGIBSON Ent ed By: JMONDRAGON K
Action: Time Exp:
i (
�
, ���
�
Inspection Historv C��.�.
Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING **Approved""
05/26/11 In�sp ector: MHAEBERLE Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: OK PER LETTER FROM KRM CONSULTANTS. LETTER IN LASERFICHE.
Item: 20 BLDG-Foundation/Steel **Approved*`
05/19/11 Inspector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: APPROVED PER SHANE ON THE OTHER PERMIT.
Item: 120 ELEC-Rough "Approved""
06/14/1 T Inspector: mdenney Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL
Comment: entry soffit(exterior), 2nd floor deck soffit(exterior� lgi h�ting.
08/02/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP A PRQVED
Comment:
Item: 200 MECH-Rough ""Approved*'
06/16/11 Inspector: mdenney Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
07/25/11 Inseector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: BASE BOARD HEAT 100#AIR TEST
Item: 220 PLMB-Rough/D.W.V. **Approved**
06/14/1 T Inspector: mdenney Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 230 PLMB-Rough/Water **Approved**
06/14/1 T Inspector: mdenney Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 240 PLMB-Gas Piping "*Approved**
06/14/11 Inspector: mdenney Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
: _ _ __
REPT131 Run Id: 13805
�
/`
. -- • / �
10-31-2011 Inspection Request Reporting Pa e 1
4:45 pm Vail, GO - Citv pf
Requested Inspect Date: Tuesday November 01, 2011
Site Address: 1350 SAWDSTONE DR VAIL
EIGER CHALETS BLDG 1, UNIT 6
A/P/D Information
Activity: 611-0026 Type: COMBO Sub Type: AMF Status: ISSUED
Const Type: Occup ancy: Use: R-2 Insp Area:
Owner: JANE BARBARA GROS REVOCABLE TRUST-
JOEL JEAN PIERRE GROS REVOCABLE
TRUST
Contractor: GROS, JOEL Phone: 970-926-5458
Architect: MICHAEL HAZARD AIA Phone: 970-949-4958
Description: ADD 2 BALCONIES,_�IUCCO&WINDOWS
Requested Ins ecti � ' ���?
Item• 3S0 MECH-Final � Requested Time: 03:30 PM
Request : GROS, JOEL Phone: 970-926-5458 -or- 970-390-
1930
Assigned. o: JMONDRAGON Entered By: JMONDRAGON K
Acti n: Time Exp:
f�„'
��__ C►I��l./r �
/V �3,
l
� �
L
/ �
Inspection Historv
Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING **Approved ""
05/26/11 Inspector: MHAEBERLE Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: OK PER LETTER FROM KRM CONSULTANTS. LETTER IN LASERFICH .
Item: 20 BLDG-Foundation/Steel "Approved '*
05/19/11 Inspector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: APPROVED PER SHANE ON THE OTHER PERMIT.
Item: 210 PLMB-Underground
Item: 110 ELEC-Service
Item: 120 ELEC-Rough '*Approved "'
06/14/11 Inspector: mdenney Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL
Comment: entry soffit (exterior), 2nd floor deck soffit(exterior� li hting.
08/02/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP A PR�ED
Comment:
Item: 200 MECH-Rough *"Approved *'
06/16/11 Inspector: mdenney Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
07/25/11 Inspector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: BASE BOARD HEAT 100#AIR TEST
Item: 220 PLMB-Rough/D.W.V. *•Approved*"
06/14/1 T Inspector: mdenney Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 230 PLMB-Rough/Water "*Approved""
06/14/1 T Inspector: mdenney Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 240 PLMB-Gas Piping **Approved *'
06/14/11 lnspector: mdenney Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
09/21/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: 2nd test after drywall
Item: 30 BLDG-Framing ""Approved"`
07/15l11 Inspector: Martin Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: Lath only
08/04/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 50 BLDG-Insulation ""Approved *"
REPT131 Run Id: 13697