Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PEC110014
Planning and Environmental Commisson ACTION FORM Department of Community Development MOO VE 1 � 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Color $1657 te l: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 044NITY WvUrPMEW web: www.vailgov.com Project Name: Coldstream Condos SDD Amend. PEC Number: PEC110014 Project Description: WORK SESSION DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL SDD AMENDMENT. INCLUDES THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING STRUCTURE, 5 FREE MARKET UNITS AND 2 EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNITS. THE APPLICANT WANTED TO OBTAIN SOME FEEDBACK ON THE PROPOSAL PRIOR TO THE INVESTMENT OF Participants: OWNER WOLF INVESTMENTS LLC 5350 KEYSTONE AVE INDIANAPOLIS IN 46220 APPLICANT WOLF INVESTMENTS LLC 5350 KEYSTONE AVE INDIANAPOLIS IN 46220 Project Address: 1476 WESTHAVEN DR VAIL 02/02/2011 02/02/2011 Location: COMMON INTEREST SDD PROPOSAL FOR HOA Legal Description: Lot: 53 Block: Subdivision: COLDSTREAM CONDO Parcel Number: 2103- 121 - 0801 -5 Comments: See conditions BOARD /STAFF ACTION Motion By: Action: WITHDRWN Second By: Vote: Date of Approval: Conditions: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and /or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 300 (PLAN): PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Planner: Warren Campbell PEC Fee Paid: $1,000.00 MEMORANDUM TO FROM DATE: Planning and Environmental Commission Community Development Department February 28, 2011 — T"blea fa �Pr; I 1 I, G o 11 A D'f l on : K c�r Z h �i&l C awn Apr<< II, A011 SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a proposed major amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area and site coverage, and a reduction of the side setback, located at 1476 Westhaven Drive /Lot 53, Glen Lyon Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110014) Applicant: Coldstream Homeowners Condominiums, represented by Tom Braun Planner: Warren Campbell SUMMARY The applicant, Coldstream Homeowners Association, represented by Tom Braun, is requesting a work session with the Planning and Environmental Commission on a proposed major amendment to Special Development District (SDD) No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area and site coverage, and a reduction of the side setback, located at 1476 Westhaven Drive. The proposed amendments include five additional dwelling units and two employee housing units located above a parking structure. As this is a work session the applicant and Staff request that this item be tabled to March 14, 2011. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant is requesting a work session with the Planning and Environmental Commission in order to gather feedback on a proposed major amendment to SDD No. 4 for Development Area B, Coldstream. The goal of the applicant is to gather feedback from the Planning and Environmental Commission on the proposal in order for the homeowners association to determine if additional investment is warranted to develop the documents for a final review of the project. The applicant acknowledges that this is not an official review of the project with regard to the criteria and does not perceive the feedback they receive as binding. The applicant is proposing to construct five (5) dwelling units and two (2) deed restricted employee housing units along the southern property line adjacent to Park Meadows and The Eagle Point Condominiums. The proposed units would be located on a partially buried parking structure containing 64 enclosed parking spaces with an additional three parking spaces on the exterior of the structure. These proposed improvements would replace and existing tennis court which the applicant has suggested are "obsolete" and replace "deteriorating" carports. r , In association with 111e proposed major amendment to the SDD the applicant is suggesting to provide .' 109% of the employee housing on -site (50% required) and furthermore would ' provide over twice" the required mitigation square footage for a total of approximately 2,350 square feet. This would be provided in two 3- bedroom units. a, Other improvements proposed by the applicant include: ~' + A new on -stte property manager's office within the enclosed parking structure; • Conversion of the existing manager's office back into a residential unit; and • Improvements to the project entry/arrival and auto circulation. In a letter dated February 9, 2011, Staff provided several comments on the documents submitted for review. The comments included initial feedback from all Town Departments some of which Staff acknowledged would be addressed should the project move forward with a final review of a major amendment. Those comments which Staff believes are relevant to a work session discussion to identify comments and concerns prior to moving forward are: • The lack of landscaping along the north elevation of the proposed parking structure is a concern for staff due to the height of the proposed garage and structures. The development currently incorporates a design in which landscaping is included around all structures. • Staff is concerned about the ability to place significant landscaping on the roof of the parking garage with regards to weight and soil depth. • The required snow storage will need to be shown. Currently, winter time conditions can become tight within the development. Will any areas be heated? • Possible public benefits that may be needed in the area include extension of sidewalks and stream bank stabilization. • Any encroachments that may be existing in the stream tract will be requested to be removed. • Staff has concerns about the exposed south wall of the parking structure in close proximity to the property line eliminating the ability to buffer the improvement from neighboring properties. A vicinity map (Attachment A), a written document from the applicant detailing the request (Attachment B), a set of proposed conceptual plans (Attachment C), and a letter from the applicant with responses to concerns identified by Staff in its February 9, 2011 letter (Attachment D) are attached for reference. As this is a work session Staff has not prepared responses to the nine criteria which shall be used in evaluating the merits of a major amendment to an established SDD. It will be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following standards, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. Staff believes that feedback to the applicant should consider the following criteria. A. Consideration of Factors Regarding Special Development Districts A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 12 -10 of the Vail Town Code. D. Conformity with the applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town policies and Urban Design Plan. E. Identification and mitigation of natural and /or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off -site traffic circulation. H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions. I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. Staff believes the following questions will help begin a conversation based on the proposed plans for a major amendment. Staff and the applicant acknowledge that the plans submitted are conceptual and will need to provide additional detail if the project moves forward. • Will the conceptual proposal have positive effects on the existing Coldstream Condominiums and adjacent properties with regard to design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation? • Will the conceptual proposal contain uses, activities, and density (including gross residential floor area) which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activities? • Will the conceptual proposal contain public benefits commensurate with the suggested development standard deviations? • Will the conceptual proposal contain functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions? • What other feedback would the Planning and Environmental Commission like to provide? III. BACKGROUND Special Development District No. 4 Special Development District (SDD) No. 4, Cascade Village, was adopted by Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1976. At minimum of seventeen subsequent amendments occurred from 1977 through the present day, inclusive of the most recent major amendment to approve the revised development plan for Cascade Residences in 2007 and the Cornerstone project in 2008. The subject property was a Planned Unit Development under Eagle County Jurisdiction when the property was annexed in 1975. SDD No. 4 includes the following: Area A Cascade Village Area B Coldstream Condominiums Area C Glen Lyon Primary/Secondary and Single Family Lots Area D Glen Lyon Commercial Site The entire Cascade Village site is approximately 97.5 acres. Because the property was annexed into the Town of Vail as a Planned Unit Development under Eagle County jurisdiction and early Special Development Districts were not based on an underlying zoning, there is no underlying zoning for this SDD. The uses and development standards for the entire property are as outlined in the adopting ordinance for SDD No. 4. Coldstream Site The Coldstream Condominium development was completed in 1981 and included 45 dwelling units. In 1990 approvals were granted which provided for an increase in gross residential floor area in association with a project which did not move forward. Most recently Coldstream completed a complete renovation to the exterior of all buildings including siding materials, windows, and doors. IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BOARDS Major Amendment to a Special Development District Planning and Environmental Commission: The PEC shall review the proposal for and make a recommendation to the Town Council based upon the findings made on the criteria located in Chapter 12 -9A, Special Development District, Vail Town Code. Town Council: The Town Council takes into consideration the PEC's recommendation when reviewing an application for a special development district and is responsible for final approval /denial of an SDD. The Town Council shall review the proposal and approve /approve with conditions /deny the application based upon the findings made on the criteria located in Chapter 12 -9A, Special Development District, Vail Town Code. V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Vail Land Use Plan (in part) The goals articulated here reflect the desires of the citizenry as expressed through the series of public meetings that were held throughout the project. A set of initial goals were developed which were then substantially revised after different types of opinions were brought out in the second meeting. The goal statements were developed to reflect a general consensus once the public had had the opportunity to reflect on the concepts and ideas initially presented. The goal statements were then revised through the review process with the Task Force, the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council and now represent policy guidelines in the review process for new development proposals. These goal statements should be used in conjunction with the adopted Land Use Plan map, in the evaluation of any development proposal. Resort Accommodations and Service: This area includes activities aimed at accommodating the overnight and short -term visitor to the area. Primary uses include hotels, lodges, service stations, and parking structures (with densities up to 25 dwelling units or 50 accommodation units per buildable acre) The goal statements which Staff believes are applicable to the proposed plan are as follows: 1. General Growth / Development 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.2 The quality of the environment including air, water and other natural resources should be protected as the Town grows. 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 1.13 Vail recognizes its stream tract as being a desirable land feature as well as its potential for public use. 2. Skier /Tourist Concerns 2.1 The community should emphasize its role as a destination resort while accommodating day visitors. 2.4 The community should improve summer recreational options to improve year -round tourism. 2.5 The community should improve non -skier recreational options to improve year -round tourism. 5. Residential 5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist. 5.2 Quality time share units should be accommodated to help keep occupancy rates up. 5.3 Affordable employee housing should be made available through private efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail, with appropriate restrictions. 5.4 Residential growth should keep pace with the market place demands for a full range of housing types. 5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and upgraded. Additional employee housing needs should be accommodated at varied sites throughout the community. 6. Community Services 6.1 Services should keep pace with increased growth. 6.2 The Town of Vail should play a role in future development through balancing growth with services. 6.3 Services should be adjusted to keep pace with the needs of peak periods. Town of Vail Zoning Regulations Special Development District (in part) 12 -9A -1: Purpose And Applicability: A. Purpose: The purpose of the special development district is to encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of the new development with the town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas, and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail comprehensive plan. An approved development plan for a special development district, in conjunction with the property's underlying zone district, shall establish the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the special development district. 12 -9A -2: Definitions: MAJOR AMENDMENT (PEC AND /OR COUNCIL REVIEM: Any proposal to change uses; increase gross residential floor area; change the number of dwelling or accommodation units; modify, enlarge or expand any approved special development district (other than "minor amendments" as defined in this section), except as provided under section 12 -15 -4, "Interior Conversions" ; or 12 -15 -5, 'Additional Gross Residential Floor Area (250 Ordinance)'; of this title. VI. ZONING ANALYSIS The following is a zoning analysis of the development potential of Development Area B as contained within the SDD. Legal Description: Lot 53, Glen Lyon Subdivision Land Use Designation: Resort Accommodations and Services Lot Size: 173,369 sq. ft./3.98 acres Development Standard Allowed Existin Proposed Lot Area: 173,369 s.f. 173,369 s.f no change Setbacks: South: Per SDD 20 ft. 3 ft. Height: 48 ft. 48 ft. no change Density Control: 65 d.u.s 45 d.u.s 50 d.u.s 2 e.h.u.s GRFA: 65,000 s.f, 66,898 s.f. 76,898 s.f. Site Coverage: 60,679 s.f. 42,689 s.f 58,681 s.f. (35 %) (24.6 %) (33.8 %) Landscaping: 86,684 s f. 76,736 s.f. 80,218 s.f. (50 %) (44.3 %) (46.2 %) Parking 2 space per d.u. 77 spaces 97 spaces 90 required 104 required* *The proposed amendment does not increase the parking deficiency as required by Code. VII. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Land Use Zonin North: Recreation None South: Multi- family residential High Density Multiple - family District East: Residential SDD No. 4 Cascade Village West: Recreation No Zoning /General Use District VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission tables this application to March 14, 2011. IX. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Applicant's written application C. Proposed conceptual plans D. Letter from the applicant addressing Staff's February 9, 2011 letter 7 Glen Lyon Subdivision, Lot 53 fi Coldstream Condominiums (1476 Westhaven Drive) Subject Prope Major Amendment to SDD No, 4, Cascade Village 1 10i �Yi on — i, ATY Feat ta.,. 1COO Lag Modified: Fehmary24,2011 Coldstream Condominiums Cascade Village SDD Amendment January 31, 2011, revised February 24, 2011 Over the past 30 years the Coldstream Condominium Owners Association has taken many steps to continually upgrade and improve their community. Recently the Association has been evaluating the feasibility of implementing a relatively small but important improvement program that would involve the addition of five new residential units, two EHU's and a number of other on -site improvements. In order to implement this plan an amendment to SDD No. 4- Cascade Village will be necessary. Prior to submitting formal applications to amend SDD No. 4 the Association is interested in a work session level discussion with the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Town Council. The goal of these work sessions is to gauge the Town's interest in this re- development plan. While it is understood that any input received from the Town during this work session process will be preliminary and non - binding, it will none the less be beneficial to the Association in deciding what future actions to take on this re- development plan. The following provides an explanation of the proposed re- development plans and associated benefits, background on the Coldstream Condominiums, a summary of existing and proposed development, an evaluation of alternative review processes, a bullet -point response to SDD review criteria and a summary of the proposed project. Proposed Re- development/Benefits of Project Major elements of the re- development plans include the construction of five new free - market condominiums, two new employee housing units, a new parking garage and associated site improvements. There are a number of other improvements that are being considered as a part of this project. While at this stage plans are conceptual and subject to change, other specific improvements under consideration include: • Employee housing square footage that is over twice that required by the Town's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance ( +/ -2,350 sf in two 3- Bedroom units). • A new on -site property manager's office designed and constructed specifically for this purpose. • Conversion of the existing on -site manager's office back to a residential unit. • Improvements to the project entry /arrival and auto circulation for guest access. • Replacement of deteriorating carports with a fully enclosed parking structure • Replacement of 15 surface parking spaces with enclosed parking. • Replacement of the obsolete courts buildings with new residential dwellings compatible with the Coldstream vernacular. Coldstream Condominiums SDD Amendment Work Session Background on the Coldstream Condominiums The Coldstream Condominiums were completed in 1981 and include 45 residential condominiums and other related improvements including on -site parking, extensive landscaping, pool, spa, cabana, tennis court and a racquetball /squash court. Coldstream has approximately 23 units included in the Vail Cascade short term rental program; total revenues are approximately $1.3 million per year producing approximately $130,000 of sales and lodging tax revenue to the Town. The on -site management office and housekeeping facilities are very important to these short-term rental operations. With the opening of the Cascade Club [Aria] in 1987 (with its seven tennis courts and six racquetball/squash courts), the Coldstream tennis and racquetball/squash facilities became obsolete as Coldstream owners are able to utilize Cascade Club facilities. Since that time the racquetball /squash court has been adapted to property and rental management use and the tennis court is seldom used. In late 1990 an amendment to SDD4 was proposed and recommended by Community Development Department [9/24/90] to approve a small increase in GRFA and clarify other development standards. The plan included the renovation of the courts building into property management facilities and storage as well as two employee restricted units. Because of financing difficulties the project never implemented. Since it's opening in the early 1980's the Coldstream Association has been very diligent in maintaining and upgrading the project. In 1995, Coldstream owners expended $1.5 million to replace the roofs and make substantial site /landscape improvements. In 2002 the Association spent a considerable amount of money to bring natural gas into the project. In 2004, the Board prepared a phased redevelopment plan for the project. The first phase consisted of replacing all building exteriors: siding, windows, doors and extensive landscape and site improvements at a cost of $6.2 million. These improvements were completed in 2006. The second phase is to replace the court facilities and carports which are deteriorating. As evident by this proposal, Coldstream owners continue to demonstrate their commitment to an aggressive maintenance and improvements program for their project. Existing and Proposed Development Coldstream is situated on an approximately 3.98 acre ( +/- 173,369 sf) parcel designated as Area B in Special Development District 4 (SSD No. 4, Cascade Village). The property does not have underlying zoning as it was annexed into the Town with the creation of SDD4. SDD No. 4 - Area B development standards include: Coldstream Condominiums SDD Amendment Work Session • Dwelling units • GRFA • Site Coverage • Landscaping • Parking Spaces • Height • Setbacks Allowed 65 65,000 sf 35 %, or 60,967 sf 50 %, or 86,684 sf( *) As per Chapter 10( * *) 48 ft 20 ft Existin 45 66,898 sf 42,689 sf 88,686 sf 77 48 ft 20 ft ( *) — Or as otherwise indicated on site specific development plan. ( * *) — 50% of required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings or hidden from view. With the exception of GRFA and setbacks (for the substantially below grade parking structure), the proposed addition can be constructed in accordance with all applicable development standards outlined by SDD No. 4. The following summarizes how the proposed amendment/addition would affect zoning/development standards: Dwelling Units The five proposed condominium units would increase project density to 50 units, well below the maximum allowable of 65 units (the two EHU's, if developed as Type III units would not count toward density). GRFA Existing development slightly exceeds the maximum allowable GRFA of 65,000 sq ft. The five condominiums would add approximately 10,000 sq ft of GRFA to the site. The two EHU's, if developed as Type III units would not count towards GRFA. Site Coverage Proposed improvements would increase site coverage from +/- 42,689 to +/- 58,681 sq ft, or 34% of the site. The allowable site coverage is 35 %. Existing and proposed site coverage diagrams are found at the end of this report. Landscaping While detailed landscape plans have not yet been done, a green roof is envisioned as a possible solution for the parking garage. Assuming that a green roof is a part of the final design solution the total landscaping of the entire site would actually increase from +/- 44% to +/ -46 %. Existing and proposed conceptual landscape diagrams are found at the end of this report. Parking There are presently approximately 77 parking spaces at Coldstream. These spaces include surface spaces, parking in carports and garage parking within individual units. Coldstream Condominiums SDD Amendment Work Session The parking requirement for the new addition would involve replacing any existing parking displaced by the project and providing parking for the new development. The proposed addition creates a requirement for 17 new spaces (10 for the five condominiums, 4 for the two EHU's, and 3 for the management office). Proposed improvements displace 47 existing surface and carport spaces. This means 64 new spaces are required. The proposed parking garage is designed for 64 parking spaces and 3 new surface spaces are also proposed for a total of 67 new spaces. This would satisfy parking requirements Height The SDD allows for building height of 48'. The proposed improvements will be designed within this limitation. Setbacks 20' setbacks are required by SDD No. 4. The residential buildings would conform to this standard; however the parking garage would be located within a few feet of the south property line. At the south property line the majority of the parking garage would be below grade and at the highest point would only extend 6 -8 feet above grade. The adjacent properties to the south, Eagle Pointe Condominiums and Park Meadows, are zoned HDMF. As a point of comparison, if HDMF zoning were applied to Coldstream the allowable number of units would increase to 105 and the allowable GRFA would increase to 139,444 sq ft. This amount of GRFA is over twice that permitted by the SDD and greatly exceeds the GRFA proposed by these improvements. Review Process Alternatives As outlined above, the proposed improvements could be constructed in accordance with existing SDD development standards with the exception of GRFA and setbacks (for the below grade portion of the garage adjacent to the south property line). There are two alternatives for obtaining development approvals for these improvements: Remove Coldstream from SDD No. 4/Re -zone to HDMF/Request Setback Variance Removing Coldstream from SDD No. 4 and re- zoning to HDMF would provide more than enough GRFA to accommodate proposed improvements. However, a setback variance would also be necessary. While procedurally these steps are all feasible, there is not a great deal of precedence in removing land within an existing SDD (under these circumstances) which creates a degree of uncertainty with this process alternative. In addition, from the town's perspective simply re- zoning Coldstream to HDMF would leave the door open for a significant re- development of the property and not provide the Town with the same certainty of having an approved development plan as per SDD regulations. Coldstream Condominiums 4 SDD Amendment Work Session Amend SDD No. 4 Two fairly straight forward amendments to existing SDD development standards would allow for these improvements to Coldstream — increasing allowable GRFA by + /- 10,000 sq ft and modifying setback requirements to state "20' or as otherwise indicated by an approved development plan". A development plan depicting the location of the garage would then be approved in conjunction with these amendments. While both of these processes would have the same result, amending the SDD is the preferred alternative. SDD Review Criteria The following criteria are used to evaluate a proposed SDD. Bullet -point responses to how this proposal would conform to these criteria are also provided: 1. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. • The limited scope of proposed development is consistent with and sensitive to existing development within the site and on surrounding properties. 2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. • Density (dwelling units) is within that permitted by the existing SDD. • Proposed uses are consistent with existing uses on the site and with surrounding areas. 3. Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title. • Parking in accordance with Chapter 10 can be provided. 4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans. • The maintenance and upgrading of existing properties, particularly those with a strong short-term rental component is encouraged by the Town's master plans. 5. Natural And/Or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. • N/A Coldstream Condominiums SDD Amendment Work Session 6. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. • Proposed improvements are located on land that is already developed. As such this criterion is not applicable. 7. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation. Revisions to the project entry will allow for improvements to existing vehicular circulation. 8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. • With the green roof proposed for the parking garage the project will result in a net increase to landscape area (44% to 46 %). 9. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. • The project would be done in one phase. Project Summary The revenue to be derived from the five condominiums is clearly the "economic engine" necessary to fund other improvements to Coldstream — the two employee housing units, the development of a parking garage, a dedicated on -site management facility and other related site improvements. Contrary to a "traditional development project ", the five condominiums will not bring a windfall of profits to the Association but rather will allow for the implementation of Phase II of the Association's redevelopment master plan and in doing so further their tradition of continually maintaining and upgrading their community. With approximately one -half of Coldstream's units involved in a short-term rental program, the project plays an important role in providing the Town with guest accommodations. In addition, the lodging/sales tax revenues to the Town generated by Coldstream are not insignificant. The improvements that can be made to the project via this re- development plan will improve Coldstream's ability to serve the lodging market and in doing so provide benefit's to the entire Vail community. Coldstream Condominiums SDD Amendment Work Session &±� k \( /\ )M \ O_ E \� § / s ki me E ¥2 aem ° � 0 / �\ \\ $ m m 0 \ U k ` 00 } $ § 7 \ Coldstream Condominiums 7 SDD Amendment Work Session maw X $}$ §c" / m _ « o [R \ o ® {( m=Hm k § ( M C D n RE /$/0 o # 2» \f CL m e n o ° H g n !1? CD § / N R \ \ �. 7 § M Coldstream Condominiums Sgo Amendment Work SsSo 0 `r A 1 l w ti %Z F cn a M o o o ff° a" 0 ,o �. "CS n n0 n G 3` N f�... :. ; • O n 5 0 "1 r- a 2 a W m �•� m m fD O A. Q' �a' y a�i fj1 .� Ra r_r n ID bT a a o0 n 0 � g Y N n DI D � oW ° 0 w d V N W 7C' R ~ O O�0 V' W �V V c g " » m a. Coldstream Condominiums 10 SDD Amendment Work Session 0 0 0 rr M cr r o t" ID ¢rb r x (� r o� Tcr o(D a o C-r O 0 J � V 1 '� l r 7 1 4 ri R. z fD N N ro �. n O. � 0 5. p �. . rD o n C I ", A O O 7 C Q v , in, . O N n � I ID o m O � b n t w . � N 0 5 w �w V n C N fD � CD (D CL -, F Al �p w O ID l„7 a 0 C m ri N v � y A OQ a y 4 n �C m V t: y O O A. O r Q+ 0 m ¢, fD � M 0 o fD O O Coldstream Condominiums 11 SDD Amendment Work Session 2) >v M rD n N O o �cn0 C m Ln rt n O (D O N N :. D N FT ro O ^1 C ID ID [1. O � T,- 2 2D o o o Oq ID ID rD >L m cn n a�d ro �, a b a G O D D fD tD II II II II II �II7 V W O V V ` Coldstream Condominiums 12 SDD Amendment Work Session O O � A n V �y r Coldstream Condominiums 12 SDD Amendment Work Session W COLDSTREAM CONDOMINIUMS LOT 53 GLEN LYON SUBMISION 0 0 O n '71 CENTERLINE #-1 i ii PATH EHU EHU #4 *6 #2 L RMOG SETBACK E C � �S J ACK LINE Or PAFLKIN& RE 934 STRXTURE BELOW p F 1 .. . ...... .. .. . BUILDING OUTLNE EDGE OF ASPHALT BOULDER WALL (TYPICAL) PAR124 GRAVEL (TYPj GRATE Pl-NlTER CoNc WAL CWTYPP PARK MEADOWS BOOK 192, PACE 123 CEWrDNJW ROM tii[Lls6Y 7 LOT 4 GUN LYON SuBuysm ,4 u MET GPSL Architects, p.c. 1000 S. Frontage Rd. West Vag, Colorado 81657 Tel: 970.476.1147 fax: 970.476.1612 gpslarchitects.com � 6 ts) () —A -A r l e A, Dots: 5 ion 2011 kANAGE 'I 10411T XPT. SITE PLAN Sheet Number I ---------- 1 1 j"�b Al .0 L i Writ YELLOW PLASM COP L.S. rrP. Iwo SB•5r3rW - 32L7W WALO. • MATTERHORN CIRCLE UK E430M MOK 220 AT PAGE 3= W�RIGHT-OF-WAY) Lq SEE MOTE PER n., EAGLE PORME CONDOMPM -A .. . ...... .. .. . BUILDING OUTLNE EDGE OF ASPHALT BOULDER WALL (TYPICAL) PAR124 GRAVEL (TYPj GRATE Pl-NlTER CoNc WAL CWTYPP PARK MEADOWS BOOK 192, PACE 123 CEWrDNJW ROM tii[Lls6Y 7 LOT 4 GUN LYON SuBuysm ,4 u MET GPSL Architects, p.c. 1000 S. Frontage Rd. West Vag, Colorado 81657 Tel: 970.476.1147 fax: 970.476.1612 gpslarchitects.com � 6 ts) () —A -A r l e A, Dots: 5 ion 2011 kANAGE 'I 10411T XPT. SITE PLAN Sheet Number I ---------- 1 1 j"�b Al .0 L i Writ YELLOW PLASM COP L.S. rrP. Iwo SB•5r3rW - 32L7W WALO. • GPSL Architects, p.c. 1000 S. Frontage Rd. west Vail. Colorado 81657 tel: 970.476.1147 fax: 970.476.1612 gpslarchitects.com z O C _ O N Q p O LU Q m l(1 v PARKING LEVEL PLAN PARKING AREA = 21,436 sq ft. 1'-0" SUPPORT AREA = 2,456 sq. Ft. o d Date: 5 Jan 2011 Sheet Number A2 I Id 4H REPLACEMENT + 64 TOTAL THIS LEVEL . 10 (5 UNITS x2) . 3 GUEST 4 (2 EHU •2) 5 OFFICE c l c I c l nyl c 65 REQUIRED l c I c I c l c PARKING LEVEL PLAN PARKING AREA = 21,436 sq ft. 1'-0" SUPPORT AREA = 2,456 sq. Ft. o d Date: 5 Jan 2011 Sheet Number A2 L GPSL Architects, p.c. 1000 S. Frontage Rd. West Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.476.1147 fax: 970.476.1612 gpsiarchitech.com i I_Z I� lu IQ ILU I I0) Io I� Im Ip la l la t Q y O I LU LU W N aQa I d) 0 J w w J Q N 4 J 0- TYPICAL UNIT PLANS GFtFA = Q49 sq ft. /unit %4" = 1' -0" Oc Q > 2, 713 Q O O J � JI-U W 6 > Q m U1 OJ v Date: 5 Jon 2011 Sheet Number A5 GPSL Architects, p.c. 1000 S. Frontage Rd. West Vall, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.476.1147 fax: 970.476.1612 gpslarchifects.com 7YFICAL EHU GRFA = 1,115 sq ft/ nit 1/4" = 1' -0" O � Q ' Q .2)nn 0 V l 13 i O - v Lu C �v> Qm ►n A4-1 O° v . �d Date: 5 Jan 2011 Sheet Number A4 GPSL Architects, p.c. 1000 S. Frontoge Rd. West Val, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.476.1147 fax: 970.476.1612 gpslorchitects.co- NORTH ELEVATION O 16' WEST ELEVATION /SECTION O I6' F O I6' z O � Q � ,1� � V J A ..� V Q m —A 4-3 OA v m Date: 5 Jm 2011 Sheet Number A 5 WEST ELEVATION (p EHU AL N W a m ww B S0(_,1AIIS, INC... LAND PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 17, 2011 Mr. Warren Campbell Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: Coldstream Condominiums /SDD Work Session Discussion Dear Warren: Thank you for your letter of February 9` re: initial staff comments on the SDD Work Session submittal for Coldstream. While many of these comments are most appropriately addressed after more detailed design has been done and during the formal development review process, we do appreciate the "heads up" on what may be discussion points. The following is a brief reply to the points raised in your letter: • The development will be required to be sprinklered and have monitored fire alarms. Response We assume that this comment pertains to the sprinkling and monitoring of the proposed new building. This would be addressed during the detailed design of the building. • Research will need to be performed to determine if a recreation fee credit was given for the tennis court site which is proposed to be removed. Fees may be due if the provided recreation improvement is removed. Response Understood. We will address this if/when the Association decides to pursue the project. • Eagle River Water and Sanitation District will need to be contacted to discuss water rights available for the proposed development. Response Understood. Based on similar discussions I've had with the District, I suspect that this will not be an issue as the project density is still below that originally allocated to the SDD. Opal Building • 225 Main Street • Suite G -002 • Edwards, Colorado - 81632 970 - 926 -7575 - 970- 926 -7576 fax • www.braunassociates.com • Any encroachments that may exist in the stream tract will be requested to be removed. Response We are not aware of any existing encroachments in the stream corridor but will certainly confirm this in the spring. • Staff has concerns about the exposed south wall of the parking structure in close proximity to the property line eliminating the ability to buffer the improvement from neighboring properties. Response Understood. There are a few potential solutions that are best addressed if/when the Association decides to move forward with the project. These could include 1) "stepping" the parking garage to lower the west end and reduce the height of the south facing wall, 2) working with our neighbors to provide a buffer by landscaping on their property, or 3) working with the neighbors to re -grade on their property in order to bury the exposed wall. Details will be needed on the shoring methods anticipated in order to construct the subterranean parking structure in close proximity to the property line. Response This is a good question but is one that cannot be answered until more detailed design work is done. This information will be provided with a formal SDD amendment request. • The site coverage and landscaping area images included with your application depict the inclusion of a parcel owned by the Town of Vail counting towards landscape area. The area in question is the "tail" of land just to the south of the development's entry adjacent to Westhaven Drive and Parkside Meadows. We do not believe this land should be included in these calculations. Response You are correct. We had understood the "tail" to be owned by the Association but it is not. Amended landscape and site coverage calcs along with a revised written description of the project will be provided to you in the next few days. Thank you again for your initial comments. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions you may have. Regards, Thomas A. Braun CC: Don MacLachlan Sid Schultz Andy Norris Planning and Environmental Commission General Information: This application is required for any proposal involving the establishment of a new special devel- opment district or an amendment to an existing special development district. The purpose of the Special Development District is to encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of the new development with the Town; to facilitate the adequate and eco- nomical provision of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan. An approved development plan for a Spe- cial Development District, in conjunction with the property's underlying zone district, shall establish the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the Special Development District. The Special Development Dis- trict does not apply to and is not available in the following zone districts: Hillside Residential, Single - Family, Duplex, Primary/Secondary. The Vail Town Code can a found on the Town's website at www.vailgov.com. The proposed pro- ject may also require other permits or applications and /or review by the Design Review Board and /or the Town Council. Fee: _$6000 —New SDD _$6000 —Major Amendment to an SDD _$1250— Major Amendment to an SDD, no exterior modifications $1000 —Minor Amendment to an SDD Description of the Request: 0"J c�Ms r,) ss - . - o , ^ 6� .4 n 4:, 'A_ S J Ja Physical Address: Kl' ( vJ o 7 r %V k-- ►�� , L0 1 lc _S Parcel Number: '2- k o 12 I ��'� 5 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970 - 328 -8640 for parcel no.) Property Owner: C , ktk S k4tlk N1 s. , ". k_+w vJ Mailing Address: tV1 u Owner's Signature: Primary Contact/ Owner Representative: - \ J— Mailing Address: 1�_ TOWN O VAIL E -Mail: lqw�=e co Fax: 1 2. (p 1 l0 For Office Use Only: p �" Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Exp. Date: Auth # Check # � 7 OVI Fee Paid: $ 1 QQ n Meeting Date: Planner: Zoning: Received From: C0t_n5 REiity► CO)'J,00 Oq5&�u . DRB No.: P eL 11 D ©1 y Project No: PR.s I ( - 0 b 0 Land Use: Location of the Proposal: Lot:. J 3 Block: Subdivision: LEA) )'yo A) aclani V # S, DA) Phone: 01- Jan -11 Special Development District Application for Review by the 100 0F JOINT PROPERTY OWNER WRITTEN APPROVAL LETTER The applicant must submit written joint property owner approval for applications affecting shared ownership properties such as duplex, condominium, and multi- tenant buildings. This form, or similar written correspondence, must be com- pleted by the adjoining duplex unit owner or the authorized agent of the home owner's association in the case of a con- dominium or multi- tenant building. All completed forms must be submitted with the applicants completed application. I, (print name) U o IJ 'A rAf 'v , a joint owner, or authority of the association, of property located at —L v,u < ( 4 � 00"Ven - Dr. , provide this letter as written approval of the plans dated 1.5 which have been submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for the proposed improvements to be completed at the address not- ed above. I un derstand that the proposed improvements include: � � / I //// �r AJO lwc l^ v $ke-Vt s c�ra ( 6Se a`E - AL tit¢ �aycS 5/ % - /, J, v c 47," 11-fL far /9 U F 0692- , -� 5 S( dy1 e- ve� Additionally, please check the statement below which is most applicable to you: I understand that minor modifications may be made to the plans over the course of the review process to ensure com- pliance with the Town's applicable codes and regulations. (Initial here) I understand that all modifications, minor or otherwise, which are made to the plans over the course of the review pro- cess, be brought to my attention by the applicant for additional approval before undergoing further review by the Town. (Initial here) (Signature) (Date) BRAUN ASSOCIATES, INC.. LAND PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT January 31, 2011 Mr. Warren Campbell Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: Coldstream Condominiums /SDD Work Session Discussion Dear Warren: Enclosed you will find material intended to facilitate work session level discussions with staff, the PEC and Town Council regarding a possible major amendment to SLID No. 4 /Coldstream Condominiums. We have previously met with George Ruther regarding this potential project and based on those discussions we are confident that the enclosed material is sufficient for facilitating these work session discussions: • Conceptual site plan, elevations and floor plans prepared by GPSL Architects, • A written report with background on Coldstream and a summary of the potential project, • Application form. Our hope is to present this project to the PEC on February 28 and to the Town Council on March 15 The Council date is particularly important as Andy Norris (Coldstream owner) will be in town that week. We will provide an adjacent property owners list and envelopes in the next day or two. Please advise as to the application fee (if any) that we need to provide. Please do not hesitate to call with any questions or comments. Regards, Thomas A. Braun CC: Don MacLachlan Sid Schultz Opal Building • 225 Main Street • Suite G -2 • Edwards, CO 81632 970- 926 -7575 • 970 - 926 -7576 fax • www.braunassociates.com Adjacent Owners: GLEN LYON OFFICE BUILDING C/O ANDREW D. NORRIS 1000 S FRONTAGE RD W STE 200 VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL CORPORATION PO BOX 959 AVON, CO 81620 -0959 SOHO DEVELOPMENT LLC 950 17TH ST STE 1600 DENVER, CO 80202 VAIL CORP PO BOX 7 VAIL, CO 81658 ROBERT J. ROSEN 2005 QPRT NANCY ROSEN 2005 QPRT 1127 LAKE AVE GREENWICH, CT 06831 ORRAS, IGNACIO 777 POST OAK BLVD 550 HOUSTON, TX 77056 EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DIST 846 FOREST RD VAIL, CO 81657 TOWN OF VAIL C/O FINANCE DEPT 75 S FRONTAGE RD VAIL, CO 81657 DANN PETER - Registered Agent PO BOX 5480 AVON, CO 81620 VAIL RUN RESORT COMMUNITY 1000 LIONS RIDGE LOOP VAIL, CO 81657 RCR Vail LLC 390 INTERLOCKEN CRESCENT STE 1000 BROOMFIELD , CO 80021 JPSSE VAIL IMMOBILIERE LLC RUBEN DARIO 115 TORRE 2 602 MEXICO D.F. CP 11580 MEXICO 3 GCP INC AV CHAPULTEPEC 18 MEXICO DF 06640 MEXICO MARK GREENHILL REV TRUST - ELIZABETH GREENHILL REV TRUST - MARK GREENHILL FAMILY DESCENDANTS TRUST 153 SHERIDAN RD WINNETKA, IL 60093 CAREY, ROBERT B. 6912 E HUMMINGBIRD LN PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 SHARE SYNDICATE XIII LLC ALISON BUCHHOLTZ 675 LIONSHEAD PL VAIL, CO 81657 JANICE SAUVAGE TRUST NO 1 8650 W TROPICANA AVE 208 LAS VEGAS, NV 89147 SCHICIANO, KENNETH 43 HIGHGATE RD WELLESLEY, MA 02481 5 GCP INC AV CHAPULTEPEC 18 COL DOCTORES MEXICO DF MEXICO JOSEPH O. BROUGHTON TESTAMENTARY TRUST 240 ASH ST DENVER, CO 80220 BROUGHTON, JOSEPH 0., JR & LINDA K. 240 ASH ST DENVER, CO 80220 RICHARD E. & MARTHA GRIFFITH DEAN TRUST, RICHARD E. & MARTHA GRIFFITH DEAN TRUSTEES PO BOX 970 TONGANOXIE, KS 66086 SIMBA RUN CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION Farrow HiX 1100 N FRONTAGE RD VAIL, CO 81657 BREAKAWAY WEST ASSOCIATION Chrisane A. Spaeth PO Box 3717, Eagle, CO 81631 BREAKAWAY WEST ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 1743, Vail, CO 81658 SANDSTONE 70 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. Vail Tax & Accounang, Inc. BOX 5940 AVON, CO 81620 SANDSTONE 70 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. PO BOX 1679 AVON, CO 81620 CDOT 4201 E. ARKANSAS AVENUE DENVER, CO 80222 WDL VAIL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. GRAHAM FRANK POST OFFICE BOX 959, AVON, CO 81620 LIFTSIDE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION VAIL CASCADE CONDOMINIUMS 1476 WESTHAVEN DR, VAIL, CO 81657 LIFTSIDE, L.L.C. ABPLANALP LAW OFFICE, LLC SUITE 301 521 EAST LIONSHEAD CIRCLE VAIL, CO 81657 CASCADE CLUB ASSOCIATION DON MACLACHLAN 1300 WESTHAVEN DR VAIL, CO 81657 L -0 WESTHAVEN INC THOMSON REUTERS PTS 1125 17TH ST STE 1575 DENVER, CO 80202 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PO BOX 25127 LAKEWOOD, CO 80225 WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST 900 GRAND AVE. P.O. BOX 948 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81602 CASCADE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, INC. JULIE GRIMM 1000 S FRONTAGE RD WEST #200 VAIL, CO 81657 MARIA SISON 1476 WESTHAVEN DRIVE, 41, VAIL, CO 81657, MCMAHAN, JOHN T. & LYNN 676 N ST CLAIR STE 1575 CHICAGO, IL 60611 WALTON GROWTH FUND LP IN CARE OF NAME MARINER HOLDINGS 4200 W 115TH ST STE 100 LEAWOOD, KS 66211 FLOWER, MICHAEL G. & ELIZABETH RAMSEY 31899 CIRCLE DR LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 -6860 MILLRACE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION JULIE GRIMM 1000 S FRONTAGE ROAD WEST #200, SUITE 200, VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL CASCADE CONDOMINIUMS 1476 WESTHAVEN DRIVE, #1, VAIL, CO 81657 FERRY, TERRANCE F. & GAIL LOWENTHAL 1390 WESTHAVEN DR 6 VAIL, CO 81657 KARINN KIM - GRANGER REVOCABLE TRUST 600 TRADE CENTER BLVD CHESTERFIELD, MO 63005 PETERSON, JERRY W. PO BOX 1408 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80150 -1408 CGC VAIL LLC 115 SHORECLIFF RD CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 -2646 KAISER, PETER & ANAFU M. 10 EDWARDS POINT RD RUMSON, NJ 07760 BLUME FAMILY PTNSHP IN CARE OF NAME FRED P. BLUME PO BOX 504 CHEYENNE, WY 82003 DEWS, IULIANNA PO BOX 362 VAIL, CO 81658 JAMES A. BELTZ REVOCABLE TRUST - J. ANNE BELTZ REVOCABLE TRUST 447 PEAVEY RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 MCCULLOH, HUGH & NANCY L. 375 SAINT PAUL ST DENVER, CO 80206 SKI CASCADE LLC C/O PETER AND GRETCHEN BROWN 3696 LAKE MENDOTA DR MADISON, WI 53705 HEINEN, NANCY A. & JOHN J. 2565 SOM CENTER HUNTING VALLEY, OH 44022 HASSMAN, ALAN R. & GLORIA J. 8 CREEKSIDE LN CAMP HILL, PA 17011 FLOWERS, DAVID & IZABEL 4701 S LAFAYETTE ST ENGLEWOOD, CO 80113 H &C STONE REVOCABLE TRUST 615 PALISADES AVE SANTA MONICA, CA 90402 VALENTINE, ROSSLYN M. PO BOX 910 VAIL, CO 81658 LIPNICK, JANIE B. 6238 29TH ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20015 BLUE OX LLC 17 CAMPBELL RD WAYLAND, MA 01778 BEARD, STANLEY S. & BONNIE K. 500 W TEXAS AVE STE 705 MIDLAND, TX 79701 EPIC RESOURCES LLC 1490 W CANAL CT 3000 LITTLETON, CO 80120 BRAMANTE, M.A. & ELEANOR 1285 WESTHAVEN CIR VAIL, CO 81657 MCMAHON TRUST 792 SAN LORENZO ST SANTA MONICA, CA 90402 PEDIGO, JAMES & RUTH ANN 2019 ALAQUA LAKES BLVD LONGWOOD, FL 32779 MARC B. LESSANS REVOCABLE TRUST PO BOX 510 FREDERICK, MD 21705 JOHN L. ALFOND 2004 TRUST IN CARE OF NAME DEXTER FAMILY OFFICE TWO MONUMENT SO, PORTLAND, ME 04101 MASON, TIMOTHY JOHN ROLLIT 2120 PARK PL STE 500 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 SIROTKIN, NEIL & GABRIELA J. 2121 N FRONTAGE RD W 197 VAIL, CO 81657 MILLER, GARY E. & V. EILEEN 1415 WESTHAVEN DR VAIL, CO 81657 HOWELL, JOHN N. & MARY L. 4605 ROCK SPRING ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22207 AXIS HOLDINGS LTD 170 MIDWEST RD SCARBOROUGH ONTARIO M1P 3A9 CANADA 1239 B WESTHAVEN CIRCLE LLC 29 LAUDER LN GREENWICH, CT 06831 1245 WESTHAVEN LLC C/O CURTIN 55 EMILY ROAD FAR HILLS, NJ 07931 BDB HOLDINGS LTD 8111 PRESTON RD STE 715 DALLAS, TX 75225 FLORES, REGINA MONTE PARNASO 161 LOMAS DE CHAPULTEPCE DF 1100 MEXICO FERRELL P. MCCLEAN REVOCABLE TRUST 7939 SE GOLFHOUSE DR HOBE SOUND, FL 33455 BERTOLE, PHILLIP & HELEN 701 GRASSMERE A.j(E INTERLAKEN, NJ 07712 SPICER, WILLIAM J. - GLEN LYON DEV 1710 PLATTE ST DENVER, CO 80202 ARENT, STEPHEN W. - SPICER, WILLIAM J. 1710 PLATTE ST DENVER, CO 80202 SMITH, DEBRA 5614 S LANSING WAY ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 BROOKS, MICHELLE 1520 E 12TH AVE DENVER, CO 80218 BRADSHAW, DAVID C. 65 CENTRAL PARK W UNIT 15 -B NEW YORK, NY 10023 RAYJIM LLC ONE NE LAGOON ISLAND CT STUART, FL 34996 FERGUSON, JOHN & VIOLET 3 HEPPLEWHITE WY THE WOODLANDS, TX 77382 KCV L.L.C. - RAINER, WILLIAM & JULIE PO BOX 550 OLATHE, KS 66051 MORGAN, MITCHELL - ETAL IN CARE OF NAME VAIL CASCADE CONDOMINIUMS INC 1476 WESTHAVEN DR VAIL, CO 81657 SI PARTNERS LTD 252 CLAYTON ST 4TH FL DENVER, CO 80206 MDSB LP 5752 S JASM IN E ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 SEP -HAVEN LLC 12770 MERIT DR STE 1000 DALLAS, TX 75251 WOLF, MARY PO BOX 354 WINNETKA, IL 60093 ALEXANDRA P. LINN REVOCABLE TRUST, ALEXANDRA P. LINN TRUSTEE 1350 GREENHILL CT VAIL, CO 81657 LOHRE, JOHN 0. & MARY B. 165 COOK ST STE 311 DENVER, CO 80206 -5310 PURCHASE, JOHN LAYTON & LARA JUNE 1310 GREENHILL CT VAIL, CO 81657 GERSTENBERGER, ALLEN & JANET 5255 BOW MAR DR LITTLETON, CO 80123 HORN, JEFFREY M. & SALLY HELMS 1320 GREENHILL CT A VAIL, CO 81657 -5835 KARLIN, MITCHELL J. PO BOX 8488 NORTHFIELD, IL 60093 GLEN LYON ASSOC LLC IN CARE OF NAME MADELYNN HAUSMAN ATTORNEY 77 W WASHINGTON ST STE 1119 CHICAGO, IL 60602 MOREIRA, DOMINGO R. 7231 SW 63RD AVE MIAMI, FL 33143 WILKINS, F.D. 4430 ARAPAHOE 165 BOULDER, CO 80303 GRANITE RANGE LP 4614 BRYN MAWR LN HOUSTON, TX 77027 COHEN, RICHARD W. 20 10TH ST 1904 ATLANTA, GA 30309 ELLENORE JOINT VENTURE IN CARE OF NAME PHILIPP A KORT 210 N CHAMBORD DR ATLANTA, GA 30327 GURRENTZ, HEDY & KENNETH G. 5360 S BOSTON ST GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 1334077 ONTARIO INC 2531 STANFIELD RD MISSIGAUGA ONTARIO L4Y1S4 CANADA BLIVAS FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 148 S WESTGATE AVE LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 SUSAN RUBENSTEIN QUALIFIED PERSONAL RESIDENCE TRUST 65 E GOETHE 5 E CHICAGO, IL 60610 DUNNING, PETER B. & LUCY 1461 GREENHILL CT VAIL, CO 81657 ORLINSKY, DAVID 103 W 89TH ST NEW YORK, NY 10024 ORTEGON, ANTHONY & VERA 2 ROCKBRIDGE LN PUEBLO, CO 81001 SCHUBERT SIBLINGS TRUST 2005, MICHAEL J. & THOMAS F. SCHUBERT TRUSTEES 3703 VILLAGE PARK DR CHEVY CHASE, MD 20815 NAGLE, TIM W. & KAREN M. 4 LACEWOOD LN HOUSTON, TX 77024 LANDERS, JOHN & DEBRA 2530 OUTLOOK TRL BROOMFIELD, CO 80020 1456 VAIL LLC PO BOX 745 VAIL, CO 81658 JACK F. KEMP REVOCABLE TRUST 1901 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 300 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 -5805 CUNNINGHAM, BARRY E. 271 ANEMONE DR BOULDER, CO 80302 HARLAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC C/O HAL P HARLAN PRESIDENT 7597 E US HWY 36 AVON, IN 46123 -7171 HOVEY, NANCY M. 1 WOODHOLM LN MANCHESTER, MA 01944 -1057 1439425 ONTARIO INC 17 CHESTNUT PARK RD TORONTO ONTARIO M4W1W4 CANADA MARJORIE H. ODEEN REVOCABLE INTER VIVOSTRUST 1435 HARVEST CROSSING DR MCLEAN, VA 22101 MORLEY, REBECCA D. & ANDREW W. 1330 SONGBIRD CT BOULDER, CO 80303 HINZ, PAMELA SHEILA 1460A GREENHILL CT VAIL, CO 81657 PHILIP H. CORBOY JR TRUST 33 N DEARBORN CHICAGO, IL 60602 1359 GREENHILL COURT LLC 101 S CLERMONT DENVER, CO 80246 MEISTER, RICHARD W. &JULIE L. 39 LOCKWOOD AVE OLD GREENWICH, CT 06870 DULUDE, RICHARD & JEAN PO BOX 537 1134 LAKE AVE GEORGES MILLS, NH 03751 -0537 KIRKPATRICK, DOUGLAS H. & JOAN M. 48 HYDE PARK CIR DENVER, CO 80209 THE CASCADES ON GORE CREEK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. VAIL CASCADE CONDOMINIUMS, 1476 WESTHAVEN DRIVE, #1, VAIL, CO 81657 CASCADE RESIDENCES INC., PO BOX 1152, VAIL, CO 81658 1310 BUFFALO PROPERTIES LLC, PO BOX 331, BOULDER, CO 80306 MONFORT, CHRISTINE A. 3519 HOLMAN CT GREELEY, CO 80631 COVINGTON REALTY CORP AND KNIGHTSBRIDGE REALTY CORP WIGGIN & DANA 450 LEXINGTON AVE STE 3800 NEW YORK, NY 10017 HARTUNG, CHARLES G. & PETRA T. 4000 DUSTIN RD BURTONSVILLE, MD 20866 L -0 VAIL HOLDING INC THOMSON REUTERS PTS 1125 17TH ST STE 1575 DENVER, CO 80202 NYQUIST, JAMES A. - DURELS, JOCELYN E. 967 SCIOTO DR FRANKLIN LAKES, NJ 07417 -2821 NEUFELD ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 11387 GREEN BAY, WI 54307 BLUE TIGER LLC 2121 N FRONTAGE RD W 197 VAIL, CO 81657 CASCADE RESIDENCES INC - CIVIC RESIDENTIAL SUBASSOCIATION INC PO BOX 1152 VAIL, CO 81658 SSK INVESTMENTS LLC 4315 WASHINGTON ST COLUMBUS, IN 47203 WESTHAVEN AT CASCADE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION MARIA SISON 1476 WESTHAVEN DRIVE, #1 VAIL, CO 81657 CASCADE CLUB ASSOCIATION 1300 WESTHAVEN DR VAIL, CO 81657 DANN PETER PO BOX 5480 AVON, CO 81620 ELDORADO REALTY CO 5291 E YALE AVE DENVER, CO 80222 GLORIA J. MCMAHON TRUST 1700 ROSAMOND MICHIGAN CITY, IN 46360 VAIL PARK ASSOCIATES LTD 1472 MATTERHORN CIR VAIL, CO 81657 BOYER, MICHAEL 1472 MATTERHORN CIR VAIL, CO 81657 PARK MEADOWS 6D LLC 1 PALMISANO 401 W SEMINARY AVE LUTHERVILLE, MD 21093 HUDGENS, MOYNA N., JAMES L. & JOHN M. - BILR CORPORATION 43 SUNSET DR CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE, CO 80113 OGNIBENE, PETER J. 509 PENDLETON ST ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 BOYER, EDLYNE 1200 MCARTHUR LN MCALESTER, OK 74501 -7150 SVOBODA, ROBERT - LANNI, LEONARD PARK MEADOWS LODGE 1472 MATTERHORN CIRCLE VAIL, CO 81657 EDRICH, ANDREASJ. 9643 LAS COLINAS DR LONE TREE, CO 80124 -4200 TOWN O qV THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12 -3 -6, Vail Town Code, on February 28, 2011, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A request for the review of a variance from Section 12 -6H -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition within the setback, located at 400 East Meadow Drive, Unit 7 (Tyrolean Inn) /Part of Tract B, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110011) Applicant: Black Stallion Holdings, represented by Pierce Architects Planner Bill Gibson A request for the review of a exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12 -713-7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the addition of enclosed floor area, located at 302 Hanson Ranch Road, Unit 301 (Mill Creek Court Building)/ Lot I, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 5, and setting details in regards thereto. (PEC110012) Applicant: Gail Ellis, represented by Craig Snowdon Planner: Rachel Dimond A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a proposed major amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area ,�5 nd site coverage, and a reduction of the side setback, located at 1476 Westhaven Drive /Lot 3, Glen Lyon Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110014) Applicant: Coldstream Homeowners Condominiums, represented by Tom Braun Planner: Warren Campbell A report to the Planning and Environmental Commission on the administrator's approval of an amendment to an existing conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12- 16 -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in the floor area on the lowest level of the structure, located at 395 South Frontage Road West (Lionshead Auxiliary Building) /Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead Filing 1, Lot 3, A Resubdivision of Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 2, and East Lionshead Circle rights -of -way, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110015) Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Tom Kassmel Planner: Warren Campbell The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call 970 - 479 -2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24 -hour notification. Please call 970 - 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Published February 11, 2011, in the Vail Daily. 75 South Frontage Road Vail, C lonido 81657 unvta vailgov. corn February 9, 2011 Tom Braun 225 Main Street Edwards, CO 81632 Department of Conttnttrtiiy Developrnertt 970. 479.2138 fY..9,70.479.2452 RE: Proposed SDD Amendment for Coldstream Condominiums located at 1476 Westhaven Drive /Lot 53, Glen Lyon Subdivision Dear Mr. Braun, The Community Development Department is in receipt of your application to amend Special Development District (SDD) No. 4, Cascade Village. After an initial review in preparation for a work session with the Planning and Environmental Commission on February 28, 2011, staff has the following comments: • The development will be required to be sprinklered and have monitored fire alarms. • Research will need to be performed to determine if a recreation fee credit was given for the tennis court site which is proposed to be removed. Fees may be due if the provided recreation improvement is removed. • Eagle River Water and Sanitation District will need to be contacted to discuss water rights available for the proposed development. • The lack of landscaping along the north elevation of the proposed parking structure is a concern for staff due to the height of the proposed garage and structures. The development currently incorporates a design in which landscaping is included around all structures. • Staff is concerned about the ability to place significant landscaping on the roof of the parking garage with regards to weight and soil depth. • The required snow storage will need to be shown. Currently, winter time conditions can become tight within the development. Will any areas be heated? • Possible public benefits that may be needed in the area include extension of sidewalks and streambank stabilization. • Any encroachments that may existing in the stream tract will be requested to be removed. • Staff has concerns about the exposed south wall of the parking structure in close proximity to the property line eliminating the ability to buffer the improvement from neighboring properties. • Details will be needed on the shoring methods anticipated in order to construct the subterranean parking structure in close proximity to the property line. • The site coverage and landscaping area images included with your application depict the inclusion of a parcel owned by the Town of Vail counting towards landscape area. The area in question is the "tail" of land just to the south of the development's entry adjacent 75 South F 10 nu gc Road Department of Conttnuniiy Development Vail, Colorado 81657 .970.•x'79.2138 tutvzv.vailoov.coin fY. 970. to Westhaven Drive and Parkside Meadows. We do not believe this land should be included in these calculations. The first three bulleted comments do not need to be addressed prior to the work session hearing. Please provide written responses to the reaming comments. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me by email at wcampbell(a)_vailgov.com or by phone at 970 - 479 -2148. Sincerely, / ^n - 0)O" � 'W. � eL Warren Campbell, AICP Chief of Planning Town of Vail Cc: File NYQUISTX,MES 967 S96TO DR FR KLIN LAKES, NJ 07417-28 E. N*XXTF- 076 4E 1 70 02/20/1 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWAFM *1479-0-3695--10-44 9 NYQUISTX,MES 967 S96TO DR FR KLIN LAKES, NJ 07417-28 E. N*XXTF- 076 4E 1 70 02/20/1 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWAFM *1479-0-3695--10-44 Warren Campbell From: Tom Braun <tom @braunassociates.com> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:37 AM To: Warren Campbell Cc: 'Sid Schultz'; DMacLachlan @DestinationHotels.com; 'andy norris' Subject: revised submittal Attachments: 2 -17 -10 Revised SDD Worksession Submittal.pdf Hi Warren, The attached PDF is the revised written and graphic submittal for the Coldstream work sessions. I have prepared a letter formally responding to your letter of last week. It is currently being reviewed by the project team. I will have that to you by Monday. Thanks again for your help with this, give me a call with any questions you may have. Regards, Tom Tom Braun Braun Associates, Inc. 225 Main Street, Suite G -2 Edwards, Colorado 81632 (970) 926 -7575 www.braunassociates.com B.. 1 Warren Campbell From: Tom Braun <tom @braunassociates.com> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 10:15 AM To: Warren Campbell Cc: 'MacLachlan, Don'; 'andy norris'; 'Sid Schultz' Subject: response to staff letter Attachments: 2 -17 -11 Response to Warrens Itr.pdf Hi Warren, Attached is the response to your comments that we've discussed. Give me a call with any questions /comments you may have. Thanks, tom Tom Braun Braun Associates, Inc. 225 Main Street, Suite G -2 Edwards, Colorado 81632 (970) 926 -7575 www.braunassociates.com - �UJ N G I \11 �-. INk OLNP P IAN NI'k &(I)MMir's.`4 1 Warren Campbell From: Tom Braun <tom @braunassociates.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 20119:32 AM To: Warren Campbell Cc: 'MacLachlan, Don'; 'andy norris' Subject: coldstream Morning, We had talked with George about schedule but maybe not with you. Our hope is that after the PEC next week we can be in front of the TC on March 15 Andy Norris would very much like to be at these meetings, he is on an extended trip and will not be here next week but will be back in town in March. Is there anything we /you can do now to ensure that we get time on the TC agenda on the 15 while Andy is in town? Let me know. Thanks Warren. Tom Tom Braun Braun Associates, Inc. 225 Main Street, Suite G -2 Edwards, Colorado 81632 (970) 926 -7575 www.braunassociates.com L N .A NO t"'fl AMYdthG 4 %.OMM4t ,WY I;k�•s� €x. c;. a =tai E -kT Warren Campbell From: Tom Braun <tom @braunassociates.com> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 20111:21 PM To: Warren Campbell Cc: 'Sid Schultz'; 'MacLachlan, Don'; 'andy norris' Subject: TDR Letter Thanks for the comments Warren. Most of the comments look to be best addressed at a more detailed stage of design, but appreciate the heads up and will talk to Sid about them. You are right about the "tail" of land. I was told that was part of the Association's land but County records say it is owned by the TOV. I'll get back to you with more reaction after chatting with our team. Thanks, tom Tom Braun Braun Associates, Inc. 225 Main Street, Suite G -2 Edwards, Colorado 81632 (970) 926 -7575 www.braunassociates.com Warren Campbell From: Tom Braun <tom @braunassociates.com> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 201112:50 PM To: George Ruther Cc: Warren Campbell; Don Macl-achlan; Andy Norris; Stan Zemler Subject: Coldstream Hi George I've talked to don. Our thought is to attend /participate (if appropriate) in the Councils SDD discussion next week and after that decide how to proceed. Could you pass along the memo you have prepared for that discussion? Thx Tom Sent from my iPhone Warren Campbell From: George Ruther Sent: Friday, March 11, 201111:14 AM To: 'Tom Braun' Cc: Warren Campbell; Don MacLachlan; Andy Norris; Stan Zemler Subject: RE: Coldstream Good Morning Tom We can always use a couple more spectators at the Town Council meeting. I will qualify, however, that the presentation on SDD's is only a couple of slides as it relates to LMU -2 zone district and SDD's. The presentation is not a full blown discussion on the merits of SDD's. In my presentation I do speak to the original intent of SDD's as an effort to provide flexibility and creativity which results in favorable economics that benefits both the developer and the public and some of the limtations that can be overcome by SDD's that exist with more traditional zoning. I will also emphasize that the sdd process more than the end results can be subjective, lacks clear expectations, is often ill- defined, is costly to the administer and navigate as an applicant, lacks predictability, and usually ends with someone generally dissatisfied. Again, I do not anticipate a lengthy and detailed discussion. To be clear, It is a worksession so I do not know if Dick will accept public comment. Thanks, George Ruther, AICP Director Community Development Department Direct 970.479.2145 Cell: 970.376.2675 Fax: 970.479 -2452 www.vailgov.com How are we doing? Click the following link to complete the Community Development Survey. http://www.vailgov.com/channels/survey/showSurvey.asp?survey id =55 &dept id =38 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Tom Braun [ mailto:tom @braunassociates.com] Sent: Thursday, March 10, 201112:50 PM To: George Ruther Cc: Warren Campbell; Don MacLachlan; Andy Norris; Stan Zemler Subject: Coldstream Hi George I've talked to don. Our thought is to attend /participate (if appropriate) in the Councils SDD discussion next week and after that decide how to proceed. Could you pass along the memo you have prepared for that discussion? Thx `OTAin Sent from my Whone a 3 3�N &�Qd u opoaoIo '11 g ea uoisi ipgns uoh U019 'GS 40 - Z., r • 000t 2i � 11 C SNP _..._...._...._. __. / j L a p a �d m o o J Z J �0 U e " I I � I I I I I i is I s I ' - _I � j € g al g fi �. e 0 N N l O V I I ; o Li �a LLJ CL I so d Y I i it 'A fl \'�� ' 11 �'�,� s yy �7® R� wl�fl o wild i . . . .......... . .. ...... . i:. 'N :r 1 �\` i I N lU W 20.0- J. ♦ 9 \'�� ' 11 �'�,� s yy �7® R� wl�fl o wild i . . . .......... . .. ...... . i:. 'N :r 1 �\` p oe m UOisinipgns JCh7 u019 's5 ;07 C OOOOL � oVoo b - 4 s N Y g t � Z o� g� n h � � M (� M M ys � ow V ° � U � Z~Z WOK J RK' O ,Cy J � v�vm i� U •� m �i r ----------- z w LLLL } ru- W .o J �U) ry N z QQ � QQ .4 zo ua a� c4 H r d 3 d n N U C OPP V N OPOJOIO '110n UOisinipgns UOFi - 1 UO19 'GS 10 .B W VzV - 7d Ol 55377V NVITUG5 lCad m E O - I:In27 dzV7d z z A r 0 LL 3NI'l > )V9135 9479 XOTJddV ---------------- -- ---- - -- - -- ci 3 d SaPa� It V .. b OpOa0�0'� '�Ib^ uOISIAlppnc, uOh u019 'GS 107 NOI -LIC V wV:D!!Lsa 0'D e g19 an o i S W J o r d 3 Q N n OOPP� opoaoIo-�) 'lion uoisinipgns uoh ua19 'GS 40 0 O } w w T- O z 0 oN I I z O v w O } w w I- 0 Id K 0 a Y C } a a A 0 a e C3 ftmmow is C Warren Campbell From: Tom Braun <tom @braunassociates.com> Sent: Monday, April 11, 201110:33 AM To: Stan Zemler; Andy Daly; Dick Cleveland Cc: 'MacLachlan, Don'; 'andy norris'; George Ruther; Warren Campbell Subject: Coldstream Condos/TC work session discussion Good Morning Gentlemen, Over the past few months I've been working with Don MacLachlan, Andy Norris and the Coldstream Owners Association to evaluate the feasibility of a small scale yet important addition to Coldstream. This effort would ultimately involve an amendment to the Cascade Village SDD. As an initial step we submitted a "work session" level submittal to Com Dev so we could test the waters on some of our "big picture" ideas — the general location and level of the potential development and public benefits. Our discussion with the PEC in February was very insightful and quite positive. We had planned to have an informal discussion with the Council but in conversations with George it sounds as though there has been a hesitation, or resistance to getting this discussion on a Council agenda. The purpose of this email is to ask for your consideration in doing so. Our interest in having this informal dialogue with the TC is so that we can, to the extent feasible, be efficient with the Association's expenditure of money as they evaluate this redevelopment idea. The concern we have with moving forward (in addition to obvious challenges with the current real estate market) with a full /formal application comes down to a couple of very simple realties: Given the level of design that is required and the level of details that need to be worked out prior to a SDD approval, the process is very, very expensive. Between architecture, landscape, civil, planning, etc. fees to go through the process will easily get into six figures. The SDD process is a very uncertain one — be it determining the level of development that may be appropriate or the range of "public benefits" that may be required. George's presentation a few weeks ago provided an excellent overview of the potential upsides of an SDD for both the Town and applicant, but also the many challenges with the SDD process. George's presentation provided an excellent basis for why an informal SDD discussion is an important step in the overall SDD process. Our objective is quite simple — prior to moving forward with a formal application we would like to have some idea as to whether we are "on the right track" with our ideas — i.e. in concept is the idea of additional development at Coldstream have legs and are the range of public benefits we are contemplating in the ball park? By no means are we asking for or expecting any form of binding commitment from the PEC or TC, we are simply looking for some indication as to whether our idea has any merit. We know there is a full review process ahead of us, we know we have much work to do. We simply want to do what we can to identify any "red flags" before a large expenditure of funds. I understand the Council has been overwhelmed with agenda's as of late. We are certainly sensitive to that and would suggest the following: • This discussion would not take a great deal of time, Warren and I could easily collaborate on our presentations and keep them to less than 10 minutes total. If TC comments /questions took 10 or 15 (which was the case with the PEC) we could get the feedback we need in less than 30 minutes. • If it helps with your scheduling, we would have no problem with an afternoon discussion so as to not add to your evening agendas. • We can be flexible with a date — while we had hoped to be in front of the Council in March, we have no problem waiting until May or June when agendas may be lighter. • We can be nimble, with limited advance notice we could be available if agenda time were to open up due to the tabling or continuance of other items. Thank you for your consideration. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions you may have, otherwise I will look forward to hearing your response to our request. Regards, Tom Tom Braun Braun Associates, Inc. 225 Main Street, Suite G -2 Edwards, Colorado 81632 (970) 926 -7575 www.braunassociates.com L. V- -i t I k � °�_