The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutB11-0068 I ��i�� i�� {�� €� ��„�� (r�a� itom id w�.� F9�e�a�i�ior�� .._ _.�.�: �.A,� ��g_ It�m� X�tiefl �lnhu�i��le .._., * 91 PW-Fir�al d�iv��rade � Yes F� 1 AP' �_ No ` 532� �W-1'�MP.C/C? Y�� F� � A� �NQ- -- r EJ�� 5� ��..�'i��_ �� '� '� �� """.. �Q '�. " 90 �1.�� '�E��`INi� �1��_ �� ,� �� Na �' �p�' �L��x��r��t��f�i��i ��'�� i � �P ��,�...✓ �� .,�.... k �1 114� _��L��r��p � -��,��i��,�,�_ �.�.�. ��w �� ! �� .... �_�._.�. ��..._.__ �.. ' 92�� l.�� i��u h _.,.,_,� .jt�� .,� ��- ��! ��____.��:�.��, � ,....._.__ ° " �OQ _��hi,��u�,�,_,__ ��1�� & � �� r` 31� I M��i�t t i��ti�� Y�� _�_ t �� .� �� __ �1a r _. __ _� .__,_�_ G` �3AQ .. �f��Ei��Y�� - , ., W �_ � __.w.� ✓t .._ ._,__ � _�. � C5[� ��i��i(�et�i��3WF�6� _ .w_ ;�I`�� ,�� 9� F�� .�, ��.._ �� —___�_��._ ' ��iE� t��i�t��d V__, ..� � r�� _I i� 1� �►� I� _. �� __._�. �� I 239 __��1.R9� �t��Hr�u�t�e__._ �`�� (�_ .�� r � �,��_....� �� d6�� 6�P��3�,ih f`�� I I�� _� N�� I� ��__�__ _�� i��;��a��+_ _�`� f�� e�_._ �� , �,� � . ' ��:___�_.�� , �` ?�_ �� r��€��.�......._.�'�� .� � ; �� o .� • �Q f �€�L�t�=f r�;*,+��_ � '�a� �.___ � 4 �� ' S� ,a..e � �1-��'ii��;�l��iu� � _�. '�fi�� -_ �.�. � �� .. _� _ ,», * �'��+J ,_.��L��=:�k,��ti�rkt��il,_ . ��r�� _t ,�� ,� . _w_. � - - ��:� `�� Y_ .. ��.i�� µ 'Y�� ,d � A� 1 .��.-, � _:r.�,.,.� � . s �" ��1 � �tAf�-il.�t�ie�sa�t��n_f�f�-�...,.,,.,,� �Yd� ��.,.�.,_. :j }��.�� ;~ ��,._ a �______._.� _,__. _ . � �. • 2� � C�i,�h� EL�ri�F,1�Nt�� '�� 'u. � �� F�+�.._... _..J * �9�u ��L��•��i �..M-- �� -.. �i�...._-.�.��-.M �� 4 __� .��,�__ � �� i�2� i�IR� �4n�� _. _ m._ -�'�� I � 9� �� I� __ �-�- _�. �� _.��_�_._.. �_...�. - �" � t�l — �_._ 1�3t3.� _._,.M:l f�l�utt��,��! �_ �� F$ ,� l_ � I�P � __. h��i: n l_`._ � 3�� JI��I��`��I ..�,.�- }Y�� -__-�- t �� .�.._ ��__� ..��_.! _ ___ -� � �*�_ 53�_ � �LtS�--T�r��i �t�i �'�� .,�.. 9 � �� i __ �._ . ��. �' �ac� __i�LI��I h�r��i 4�1f� ._-a 1fe� � ,_ l� �,P �J� w_ _ ,,, , ��9�,u_ ( qLk�h1_�'�iv1E�_�t� � � Y�� t � �AP t�'..r�fda�.� �"� 5�� trAhl-�i�lA��1�3 _'� � � i�� €3 �� A� �t�....,..� � _. .��.� r _r �_ �. p .�_�.�._..._.�._._. -- • �0 �l,t��in�l Y� �,,.�._.�-.n �� RI� �..._,. .�.._..__. __�_._._.. n „-�-� _ -��..-. . '�4��f��r�ai€c�;d'� �� Community Development Department 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado USA 81657 ,. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY This certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of Title 10, Section 10 -1 -2, ADOPTED CODES of the Vail Town Code certifying that, at the time of issuance, this structure was found to be substantially in compliance with the various ordinances of the town regulating building construction or use for the following: Name and description of project SECONDARY SIDE/ SOUTH SIDE OF DUPLEX Address of project: 1456 WESTHAVEN CIRCLE Owner name and address 1456 VAIL LLC, PO BOX 745 VAIL CO. 81658 IBC Edition: 2009 Occupancy Group(s): R3 Type(s) of Construction: VB Permit Number(s): B11 -0068 Occupant Load:_ Sprinkler System Y/ N Type: -13 2S Z. Martin Haeberle, Chief Building Official Date NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES MR OF oyta Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Permit #: B11 -0068 Job Address Location...... Parcel No.... OWNER 1456 VAIL LLC PO BOX 745 VAIL CO 81658 APPLICANT SUNDER INC PO BOX 1393 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: 789 -B CONTRACTOR SUNDER INC PO BOX 1393 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: 789 -B 1456 WESTHAVEN CR VAIL SECONDARY SIDE /SOUTH SIDE 210312402006 04/18/2011 04/18/2011 Phone: (970) 926 -2777 04/18/2011 Phone: (970) 926 -2777 Description: NEW SECONDARY SIDE /SOUTH SIDE Occupancy: R -3 Type Construction: VB Project #: Applied.....: Issued... PRJ11 -0117 04/18/2011 07/20/2011 Valuation: $930,600.00 ........................ . .................. ............................... FEE SUMMARY ,,,,......,,,.....,,».....,....,......... ..............,.,.......,,..,.. Building Permit ------ - - - - -> $5,281.00 Bldg Plan Check ----- - - - - -> $3,432.65 Use Tax Fee------------------ - - - - -> $18,412.00 Electrical Permit ---- - - - - -> $391.00 Elec Plan Check ------ - - - - -> $254.15 Restuarant Plan Review--- - - - - -> $0.00 Mechanical Permit - - - - - -> $1,120.00 Mech Plan Check ---- - - - - -> $280.00 Additional Fees--------------- - - - - -> $0.00 Plumbing Permit --- - - - - -> $900.00 Plmb Plan Check ---- - - - - -> $225.00 Recreation Fee--------------- - - - - -> $507.60 Investigation------------------ - - - - -> $0.00 Will Call ------------------------------ > $20.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES --- ---------- > $30,933.40 Payments -- ---------------------------- > $30,933.40 BALANCE DUE------------------ - - - - -> $0.00 DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FO INSP�TION SHALL BE 8:00 AM - 4�6 PM. Signature of Owner or C tractor Print combination permit_012811 TWENTY -FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM Dat T T1 N 001 RR** fifififififi* RfififiRR* RRRR* R* R***** fifififififififififififififi* fiRRRRR** RR* RRfiRfifififififififiRfifiR*** k* RRRfi* fi* fififi* fiRRfififi* RfiRRRRR* RRRRRR* R** fififififififi* R* RR* R* R* fififififififi *fiRRRRRRRR * * * * * *fififififiRRRRR ** *fifi * *fififiRRRRRRR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF Permit #: B11 -0068 Address: 1456 WESTHAVEN CR VAIL Owner: 1456 VAIL LLC Location: SECONDARY SIDE /SOUTH SIDE * RRRRRRRRR** fi** fi *fififififififififififiRRRR *RxRRRRRRR * * ** fifi *fififiR *Rfifi fifi *fiRR *RRRRRR *fifi* fifififififififi *RRRRRRRRRRR * * * * * * * * * *fi *fi * * *fiRR fifi* RR *RRRR * *fifififiRfiRfifiRRRRRRRR * * * * ** fifi* fifi *fiRfiRRRRRR * *fifififififiRR *RRRRRfiR Cond: CON0011944 Prior to footing inspection, the applicant shall submit revised plans lowering the roof pitch to comply with the 33 foot building height limit. Entry: 06/17/2011 By: bgibson Action: AP combination permit_012811 OVARLTON Permit #: 611 -0068 Owner: 1456 VAIL LLC SIDE /SOUTH SIDE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES Address: 1456 WESTHAVEN CR VAIL Location: SECONDARY Item: 00010 BLDG - FOOTING 06/16/2011 By: JRM Action: AP Comments: SECONDARY SIDE FOOTERS COMPLETE 07/11/2011 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: see highlighted plans for progress Item: 00020 BLDG - Foundation /Steel 06/29/2011 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments: see highlighted plans for progress 07/11/2011 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: see highlighted plans for progress Item: 00110 ELEC- Service Item: 00120 ELEC -Rough Item: 00140 ELEC -Misc. Item: 00200 MECH -Rough Item: 00310 MECH- Heating Item: 00320 MECH- Exhaust Hoods Item: 00330 MECH - Supply Air Item: 00340 MECH -Misc. Item: 00210 PLMB- Underground Item: 00220 PLMB- Rough /D.W.V. Item: 00230 PLMB- Rough/Water Item: 00240 PLMB -Gas Piping Item: 00260 PLMB -Misc. Item: 00224 FIRE -ALARM ROUGH Item: 00225 FIRE - SPRINKLER ROUGH Item: 00030 BLDG - Framing Item: 00050 BLDG - Insulation Item: 00060 BLDG - Sheetrock Nail Item: 00070 BLDG -Misc. Item: 00022 PLAN -ILC FRAMING Item: 00021 PLAN -ILC Foundation Plan Item: 00190 ELEC -Final Item: 00228 FIRE - Final Item: 00290 PLMB -Final Item: 00390 MECH -Final Item: 00530 BLDG -Temp. C/O Item: 00540 BLDG -Final C/O Item: 00534 PLAN - FINAL C/O Item: 00090 BLDG -Final combination permit_012811 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R110000812 Amount: $110.00 07/20/201112:07 PM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: SAB Notation: MC - JOHN �yiliU)al ii►_ \ih7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: Bll -0068 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Parcel No: 2103- 124 - 0200 -6 Site Address: 1456 WESTHAVEN CR VAIL Location: SECONDARY SIDE /SOUTH SIDE Total Fees: $30,933.40 This Payment: $110.00 Total ALL Pmts: $30,933.40 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------- - - - - -- ------------------------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 110.00 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES MO OF Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Permit #: B11 -0068 Job Address: 1456 WESTHAVEN CR VAIL Location......: SECONDARY SIDE /SOUTH SIDE Parcel No....: 210312402006 OWNER 1456 VAIL LLC PO BOX 745 VAIL CO 81658 APPLICANT SUNDER INC PO BOX 1393 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: 789 -B CONTRACTOR SUNDER INC PO BOX 1393 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: 789 -B 04/18/2011 04/18/2011 Phone: (970) 926 -2777 Description: NEW SECONDARY SIDE /SOUTH SIDE 04/18/2011 Phone: (970) 926-2777 Occupancy: R -3 Type Construction: VB Project #: Applied.....: Issued...: PRJ11 -0117 04/18/2011 05/20/2011 Valuation: $930,600.00 ..... .............. .. ................. »..,........�. ..._.....,,, ... ,,..... FEE SUMMARY .........,= a.................,.... ..,.......,..,...,.,.........., ...,......... Building Permit ------ - - - - -> $5,281.00 Bldg Plan Check ----- - - - - -> $3,432.65 Use Tax Fee------------------ - - - - -> $18,412.00 Electrical Permit ---- - - - - -> $391.00 Elec Plan Check ------ - - - - -> $254.15 Restuarant Plan Review--- - - - - -> $0.00 Mechanical Permit - - - - - -> $1,120.00 Mech Plan Check ---- - - - - -> $280.00 Additional Fees--------------- - - - - -> $0.00 Plumbing Permit --- - - - - -> $900.00 Plmb Plan Check ---- - - - - -> $225.00 Recreation Fee--------------- - - - - -> $507.60 Investigation------------------ - - - - -> $0.00 Will Call ------------------------------ > $20.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES -- ----------- > $30,823.40 Payments -- ---------------------------- > $30,823.40 BALANCE DUE------------------ - - - - -> $0.00 DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. -1--, REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM. `y Signature of Owner Print N< combination permit_012811 E TWENTY -FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM S-170111 Date •, rxxxxxxxx, r,. wxwrwxwxxxxxxxxxxwxxwrnx; rxxxxxxxxxxxxxwxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrxxrrwr.« vrvrxv. vrwxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rxr+ xr. v. xxrrxxxxx+ xxxxxxxxxxxxw, rx> v.+ xe «wwxrxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +xxx+ +xxx +rxxv.xx+ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF Permit #: 1311 -0068 Address: 1456 WESTHAVEN CR VAIL Owner: 1456 VAIL LLC Location: SECONDARY SIDE /SOUTH SIDE xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxx. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cond: CON0011944 Prior to footing inspection, the applicant shall submit revised plans lowering the roof pitch to comply with the 33 foot building height limit. combination permit_012811 WN OVAIL Permit #: B11 -0068 Owner: 1456 VAIL LLC SIDE /SOUTH SIDE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES Address: 1456 WESTHAVEN CR VAI L Location: SECONDARY Item: 00010 BLDG - FOOTING Item: 00020 BLDG - Foundation /Steel Item: 00110 ELEC - Service Item: 00120 ELEC -Rough Item: 00140 ELEC -Misc. Item: 00200 MECH -Rough Item: 00310 MECH- Heating Item: 00320 MECH- Exhaust Hoods Item: 00330 MECH - Supply Air Item: 00340 MECH -Misc. Item: 00210 PLMB- Underground Item: 00220 PLMB- Rough /D.W.V. Item: 00230 PLMB- Rough/Water Item: 00240 PLMB -Gas Piping Item: 00260 PLMB -Misc. Item: 00224 FIRE -ALARM ROUGH Item: 00225 FIRE - SPRINKLER ROUGH Item: 00030 BLDG - Framing Item: 00050 BLDG - Insulation Item: 00060 BLDG - Sheetrock Nail Item: 00070 BLDG -Misc. Item: 00022 PLAN -ILC FRAMING Item: 00021 PLAN -ILC Foundation Plan Item: 00190 ELEC -Final Item: 00228 FIRE - Final Item: 00290 PLMB -Final Item. 00390 MECH -Final Item. 00530 BLDG -Temp. C/O Item: 00540 BLDG -Final C/O Item: 00534 PLAN - FINAL C/O Item: 00090 BLDG -Final combination permit_012811 ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Statement Number: R110000512 Amount: $30,823.4005/20 /201102:02 PM Payment Method: Check Init: SAB Notation: 11475 SUNDER INC ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: Bll -0068 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Parcel No: 2103 -124- 0200 -6 Site Address: 1456 WESTHAVEN CR VAIL Location: SECONDARY SIDE /SOUTH SIDE Total Fees: $30,823.40 This Payment: $30,823.40 Total ALL Pmts: $30,823.40 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code -------------- Description Current Pmts - - - 00100003111100, GFPO - -- ------------------------ - - - - -- ELEC PERMIT FEES- GFP012 ------ - - - - -- 323.00 BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 5,281.00 EP 00100003111100 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 68.00 MP 00100003111100 MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES 1,120.00 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 4,191.80 PP 00100003111100 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES 900.00 RF 11100003112700 RECREATION FEES 507.60 UT 11000003106000 USE TAX 4% 18,412.00 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 20.00 May 17, 2011 Mr. Bill Gibson Town of Vail Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 RE: JAFFE DUPLEX, LOT 3, 1456 WESTHAVEN, VAIL, CO Dear Bill: In response to your May 17, 2011 e -mail regarding the building height of the duplex, we will be revising all 8:12 roof pitches to 7 1/2:12. This revision will keep all effected ridge heights below the 33 feet height limit. We will adjust our drawings and copy you on the revisions. Also included is the May 5, 2011 report prepared by HP Geotech addressing the debris flow conditions. Please let me know if you have any further questions. We look forward to getting started with construction. Sincerely, SEGERBERG, MAYHEW & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS Kurt A. Segerberg, A.I.A. President KAS /Irt enc. MAY 18 2011 TOWN OF VAIL Segerberg, Mayhew & Associates Architects, P.C., A.I.A. Mail: P.O. Box 4700 Vail, CO 81658 e-mail: info @smarchs.com http: / /www.smarchs.com Main Office: Eagle -Vail 101 Eagle Road Bldg. 6 Avon, CO 81620 phone: 970 476 4433 fax: 970 476 4608 Denver Office: 12600 West Colfax Avenue, Suite A -140 Lakewood, CO 80215 phone: 303 623 3355 fax: 303 623 2262 DRQII D1y7 ►JEE.VOPT14- PAWLAK GEOTEC111% May 5, 2011 FMAY Tom Jaffe 1 S 2 011 1815 West Gore Creek Drive, #E Vail, Colorado 81657 OF VAIL JJob No. 110 364A Subject: Evaluation of Potential Debris Flow Impacts to Proposed Duplex Residence, Lot 3, Glen Lyon Subdivision, Westhaven Circle and Greenhill Court, Vail, Colorado Dear Mr. Jaffe: As requested by Kurt Segerberg with Segerberg .Mayhew Architects, we have evaluated the debris flow conditions at the subject site with respect to the proposed Site Plan dated April 22, 2011 and more recent rough grading plan provided by Glenn Palmer of Alpine Engineering on May 3, 2011. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated November 29, 2010, Job No. 110 364A. The proposed building footprint is similar to that shown in our previous report but has shifted slightly to the west and rotated slightly counterclockwise. The shift and rotation provides a little more room along the east side to work with grade changes and surface drainage. The grade change between the uphill Lot 2 and the subject site is proposed to be handled by a combination of retaining walls and fairly deep swales. We suggested to Glenn Palmer to revise the upper retaining wall of the spa area to be 1 foot above the drainage swale for freeboard. The driveway entrance for the uphill, primary unit has been shifted downhill to the west and the ground floor level has been raised somewhat which will provide at least one foot of fall from. the building to the drainage pan of Westhaven Circle. Because potential debris flow impact to the lot will be from uphill across Westhaven Circle, we recommended that a civil engineer design the grading for the project. We understand that Alpine Engineering has been retained and is working to complete the grading plan started by the architect. The subject site is located in a moderate debris flow hazard area according to Town of Vail (2000). The potential flood impact to the property is from the drainage basin above the Glen Lyon Subdivision and flow across the alluvial fan upon which the property is located. Considering the property location in the lower part of the moderate hazard area, and that considerable development has occurred uphill in the subdivision, it appears that the potential impact to the property would be mainly from mud flood rather than debris flow. Mitigation of this type of flow can usually consist of on-site drainage features to route the mud flood flows down Westhaven Circle and around the east side of the lot by Tom Jaffe May 5, 2011 Page 2 earth berms, well defined swales and retaining structures. We recommend these features have a minimum depth or height of at least 2 feet and be designed to deflect flows downhill rather than intercept flows that could cause flow material to backup on the property. Based on these conditions and the rough grading plan provided by Glenn Palmer, in our opinion, the grading plan and building layout for the project can be designed such that the development will not increase the hazard to adjacent public or private properties including buildings, structures and road and utility right -of -ways. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH — PAWLAK G&kQCHNICAL, INC. a r at Steven L. Pawlak, P. F 2 " ` ; Rev. by: DEH ? ,t'l;a iorrt�t U:ot SLPJksw cc: Segerberg Mayhew Architects — Kurt Segerberg (kse erbergsmarchs.corn) Reference: Town of Vail, 2000, Ojjicaal Debris Flow Hazard Map, Town of Vail, prepared by Town of Vail, Vail, Colorado (adopted by Town Council on October 17, 2000). Alpine Engineering — Glenn Palmer, PE �alil�erulecivil.ct�_m) Job No. i 10 364x1 TFfech May 9, 2011 Mr. Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 RE: JAFFE DUPLEX, LOT 3, 1456 WESTHAVEN, GLEN LYON SUBDIVISION, RESPONSE TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATED APRIL 14, 201 1. Dear Martin: Per your request, enclosed are four sets of revised construction documents. The most notable changes to the duplex have been the modifications to the site and grading plan and some slight adjustments to the primary and secondary floor elevations. We raised the entry level and upper level of the primary unit by 1' -6 ". The primary entry drive was moved to the west to provide better drainage for this unit. The secondary unit was raised 6" and a site retention wall system is being designed for the east side of the secondary unit. The building footprint locations on the site remain the same. The revisions and responses to your April 14, 2011 letter are as follows: Architectural Comments: 1. Heat tape will be used on all gutters and downspouts. See note on Sheet A1.0 snow fence retention devices will not be used. 2. Attic ventilation will be provided though gable roof at secondary unit. See Sheet A5.1. Five hundred (500) square feet will be ventilated with a minimum vent size of 1.6 square feet per 1203.2 IBC. 3. Attic access will be provided as shown on Sheet A3.4. Sheet Survev: 1. Attached are four stamped surveys as revised by Eagle Valley Engineering per Public Works request dated April 5, 2011. Sheet A2.0: The grading plan has been reviewed by Alpine Engineering and HP Geotechnical Inc. The plan has addressed the moderate debris hazard flow. Segerberg, Mayhew & Associates Architects, P.C., A.I.A. Mail: P.O. Box 4700 Vail, CO 81658 e-mail: info @smarchs.com http: / /www.smarchs.com Main Office: Eagle -Vail • 101 Eagle Road, Bldg. 6 Avon, CO 81620 • phone: 970 476 4433 • fax: 970 476 4608 Denver Office: 12600 West Colfax Avenue, Suite A- 40 Lakewood, CO 80215 phone: 303 623 3355 fax: 303 623 2262 Mr. Martin Haeberle May 9, 2011 Page Two 2. Retaining walls will be reviewed by structural engineer and geotechnical engineer. Design is being coordinated. Sheet A7.0: 1. Party wall has been extended to under side of roof sheathing. See Detail 4/A7.0. 2. Gable separation requires 5/8" Type "X" Gyp. Bd. at ceiling and wall separations. See Detail 1 /A6.0. 3. Regarding spa cover, see Detail 5/A7.0. Also see attached Specification. Spa to be provided by "Hot Springs Company ". Sheet A8.0: 1. All windows and glazed doors to have .30 U.factor. See Window Schedule note Sheet A8.0. 2. See stone veneer attachment clarification note on masonry addendum Detail 1 W.O. 3. See note for weep location in stone veneer. Detail 1 W.O. Sheet A8.1: 1. See clarification for corner insulation detail 14/A8.1 and 15/ A8.1. Sheet A9.0 thru 9.4: l . See notes on Sheet A9.0 and A9.3 of Electrical Plans for locating permanent certificate per ResCheck requirement. 2. See located carbon monoxide detectors on Electrical Plans. Typical shown outside all bedrooms. Sheets 19.0, A9.2, A9.3 and A9.4. Structural Comments: 1. See attached response dated April 18, 2011 from S.A. Miro Structural Engineers. Mr. Martin Haeberle May 9, 2011 Page Three 2. Foundation drainage will be reviewed during the excavation and foundation work. Generally, drainage will be installed at all perimeter footings. Plumbing Comments: I . Please refer to civil engineering drawings and notes. Mechanical Comments: l . See Mechanical Sheet A3.0. Electrical Comments: 1. See notes on Sheet A9.0 by New Electrical. 2. See notes on Sheet A9.0 by New Electrical. 3. See notes on Sheet A9.0 by New Electrical. Load Calculations: 1. See attached load calculations per 220 -80 for heat tape. Please let me know if you need any further clarifications. We look forward to getting started with construction. Sincerely, SEGERBERG, MAYHEW & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS Kurt A. Segerberg, A.I.A. President KAS /Irt enc. cc: Bill Gibson P.O. Box 4700 VAIL, COLORADO 81658 (970) 476 -4433 Fax (970) 476 -4608 TO Martin Haeberle Chief Building Official Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 WE ARE SENDING YOU ® Attached ❑ Shop drawings ® Prints ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE 05 -09 -11 JOB No. 33006.00 ATTENTION Martin RE: Jaffe Duplex — Lot 3 Permit Set ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Transparencies COPIES I DATE I NO. I DESCRIPTION 4 05 -03 -11 1 1 Jaffe Duplex — Lot 3 Permit Set 05 -03 -11 ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ® For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO File SIGNED: Kurt If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once [E [Eae[ED MAY 10 2011 TOWN OF VAIL G( HP h HEPWORTH- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL May 5, 2011 Hepkorth -Paw IA Geotechnical; Inc. 5070 County Reti d 154 Getrncxxi Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970 -945 -7988 Fax: 970-945,8454 email: 11pRet4hNeolecle c,M, Tom Jane 1815 West Gore Creek Drive, #E Vail, Colorado 81657 Job No. 110 364A Subject: Evaluation of Potential Debris Flow Impacts to Proposed Duplex Residence, Lot 3, Glen Lyon Subdivision, Westhaven Circle and Greenhill Court, Vail, Colorado Dear Mr. Jaffe: As requested by Kurt Segerberg with Segerberg Mayhew Architects, we have evaluated the debris flow conditions at the subject site with respect to the proposed Site Plan dated April 22, 2011 and more recent rough grading plan provided by Glenn Palmer of Alpine Engineering on May 3, 2011. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated November 29, 2010, Job No. 110 364A. The proposed building footprint is similar to that shown in our previous report but has shifted slightly to the west and rotated slightly counterclockwise. The shift and rotation provides a little more room along the east side to work with grade changes and surface drainage. The grade change between the uphill Lot 2 and the subject site is proposed to be handled by a combination of retaining walls and fairly deep swales. We suggested to Glenn Palmer to revise the upper retaining wall of the spa area to be 1 foot above the drainage swale for freeboard. The driveway entrance for the uphill, primary unit has been shifted downhill to the west and the ground floor level has been raised somewhat which will provide at least one foot of fall from the building to the drainage pan of Westhaven Circle. Because potential debris flow impact to the lot will be from uphill across Westhaven Circle, we recommended that a civil engineer design the grading for the project. We understand that Alpine Engineering has been retained and is working to complete the grading plan started by the architect. The subject site is located in a moderate debris flow hazard area according to Town of Vail (2000). The potential flood impact to the property is from the drainage basin above the Glen Lyon Subdivision and flow across the alluvial fan upon which the property is located. Considering the property location in the lower part of the moderate hazard area, and that considerable development has occurred uphill in the subdivision, it appears that the potential impact to the property would be mainly from mud flood rather than debris flow. Mitigation of this type of flow can usually consist of on -site drainage features to route the mud flood flows down Westhaven Circle and around the east side of the lot by Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719 -633- 5562 • Silverthorne 970 -468 -1989 Tom Jaffe May 5, 2011 Page 2 earth berms, well defined swales and retaining structures. We recommend these features have a minimum depth or height of at least 2 feet and be designed to deflect flows downhill rather than intercept flows that could cause flow material to backup on the property. Based on these conditions and the rough grading plan provided by Glenn Palmer, in our opinion, the grading plan and building layout for the project can be designed such that the development will not increase the hazard to adjacent public or private properties including buildings, structures and road and utility right -of -ways. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH – PAWLAK GE CHNICAL, INC. �N�L. P 1i. s • . Steven L. Pawlak, P. gyp. 5222 o�o5'f� /CIS Rev, by: DEH "-%.. `S'SONA L�;•St�Qq� SLP/ksw cc: Segerberg Mayhew Architects – Kurt Segerberg (ksegerbg1rQo-,marclis.com) Reference: Town of Vail, 2000, Official Debris F1owHazard Map, Toitn of Pail, prepared by Town of Vail, Vail, Colorado (adopted by Town Council on October 17, 2000). Alpine Engineering – Glenn Palmer, PE (palmer (alpiiecivil com) Job No. 110 364A GecStech April 18, 2011 Kurt Segerberg Segerberg Mayhew Architects 101 Eagle Road, Bldg. 6 Avon, CO 81620 Denver RE: Jaffe Duplex — Lot 3 Glen Lyon TOV Building Department Review Comment Responses Abu Dhabi S. A. Miro Project No. 10 -146 Summit County Dear Kurt: Architecture Engineering Following are my responses to the Town of Vail building department review comments dated April Project Management 14, 2011 related to the structural drawings. Sheet S1.0 1. Both continuous and periodic special inspections of the soils are included in the schedule of special inspections. These are listed in Table 1704.7 near the bottom of the sheet. We have reviewed the soils report and it appears that the inspections listed in this table satisfy the requirements of the soils report. 2. Additional information pertaining to the reporting of discrepancies has been added to the statement of special inspections. 3. Owner /Contractor to address. 4. Concrete general note "A" has been revised to indicate ACI 318 -08. Sheet S2.0 1. Architect to address. Soils Report 1. The requirement for inspection of the bearing soils is shown in Table 1704.7 on sheet S1.0. 2. Architect to address. 3. Architect to address. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, S. A. Miro, Inc. Steven J. Marshall, P.E, S.E. Associate S. A. MIRO,, INC. www.samiro.com 610 :Main St_ Suite 11, Frisco, CO 970 - 668 -0747 CNJ(REScheck Software Version 4.4.0 Compliance Certificate Project Title: Jaffe Duplex Energy Code: 2009 IECC 49.0 Location: Vail, Colorado Orientation: Unspecified Construction Type: Single Family 0.0 Building Orientation: Bldg. orientation unspecified 1692 Glazing Area Percentage: 26% Heating Degree Days: 9248 Climate Zone: 6 Orientation: Unspecified Construction Site: Owner /Agent: Designer /Contractor: Lot 3 Glen Lyon Division Tom Jaffe Kurt Segerberg Vail, CO 81658 Segerberg Mayhew & Associates Orientation: Unspecified P.O. Box 4700 0.500 68 Vail, CO 81658 Compliance: 4.8% Better Than Code Maximum UA: 1502 Your UA: 1430 The % Better or Worse Than Code index reflects how close to compliance the house is based on code trade -off rules. It DOES NOT provide an estimate of energy use or cost relative to a minimum -code home. - - -, Wall 1: Wood Frame, 16" D.C. 401113 49.0 0.0 100 Orientation: Unspecified 7425 21.0 0.0 306 Window 2: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low -E 1692 SHGC: 0.26 0.300 508 Orientation: Unspecified Door 1: Solid 135 Orientation: Unspecified 0.500 68 Door 2: Glass 222 SHGC: 0.21 0.300 67 Orientation: Unspecified Basement Wall 1: Solid Concrete or Masonry 695 Orientation: Unspecified 15.0 0.0 33 Wall height: 10.0' Depth below grade: 10.0' Insulation depth: 10.0' Floor 1: All -Wood Joist/Truss:Over Unconditioned Space 1180 Floor 2: All -Wood Joist/Truss:Over Outside Air 38.0 0.0 31 Floor 3: Slab- On- Grade:Unheated 125 38.0 0.0 3 Insulation depth: 4.0' 210 5.0 156 Floor 4: Slab -On- Grade: Heated 212 Insulation depth: 4.0' 5.0 158 Compliance Statement: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with the permit application. The proposed buildin has been designed to meet the 2009 IECC requirements in �REScheck Version 4.4.0 and to comply with the mandatory requAW:9; sp tion Checklist. ��" �• �'cEFd� -g, fir. Name -Title Dat Project Title: Jaffe Duplex Data filename: F: \prj \jaffe2- Lot3FromSarah\ Archive \Progressl2- 16- 10 \ResCheck \Jaffe- Lot3.rck Report date: 02/15/11 Page 1 of 4 CNJ( Ceilings: REScheck Software Version 4.4.0 Inspection Checklist ❑ Ceiling 1: Cathedral Ceiling (no attic), R-49.0 cavity insulation Comments: Above -Grade Walls: ❑ Wall 1: Wood Frame, 16" o.c., R -21.0 cavity insulation Comments: Basement Walls: ❑ Basement Wall 1: Solid Concrete or Masonry, 10.0' ht / 10.0' bg / 10.0' insul, R -15.0 cavity insulation Comments: Windows: ❑ Window 2: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low -E, U- factor: 0.300 For windows without labeled U- factors, describe features: #Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No Comments: Doors: ❑ Door 1: Solid, U- factor: 0.500 Comments: Up to 40 sq.ft. of this door is exempt from the U- factor requirement. ❑ Door 2: Glass, U- factor: 0.300 Comments: Floors: ❑ Floor 1: All -Wood Joist/Truss:Over Unconditioned Space, R -38.0 cavity insulation Comments: Floor insulation is installed in permanent contact with the underside of the subfloor decking. ❑ Floor 2: All -Wood J oist/Truss: Over Outside Air, R -38.0 cavity insulation Comments: Floor insulation is installed in permanent contact with the underside of the subfloor decking. ❑ Floor 3: Slab- On- Grade:Unheated, 4.0' insulation depth, R -5.0 continuous insulation Comments: Slab insulation extends down from the top of the slab to at least 4.0 ft. OR down to at least the bottom of the slab then horizontally for a total distance of 4.0 ft. ❑ Floor 4: Slab -On- Grade: Heated, 4.0' insulation depth, R -5.0 continuous insulation Comments: Slab insulation extends down from the top of the slab to at least 4.0 ft. OR down to at least the bottom of the slab then horizontally for a total distance of 4.0 ft. Air Leakage: ❑ Joints (including rim joist junctions), attic access openings, penetrations, and all other such openings in the building envelope that are sources of air leakage are sealed with caulk, gasketed, weatherstripped or otherwise sealed with an air barrier material, suitable film or solid material. ❑ Air barrier and sealing exists on common walls between dwelling units, on exterior walls behind tubs /showers, and in openings between window /door jambs and framing. ❑ Recessed lights in the building thermal envelope are 1) type IC rated and ASTM E283 labeled and 2) sealed with a gasket or caulk between the housing and the interior wall or ceiling covering. Project Title: Jaffe Duplex Report date: 02/15/11 Data filename: F: \prj \jaffe2- Lot3FromSarah\Archive \Progress12- 16- 10 \ResCheck \Jaffe- Lot3.rck Page 2 of 4 Access doors separating conditioned from unconditioned space are weather- stripped and insulated (without insulation compression or damage) to at least the level of insulation on the surrounding surfaces. Where loose fill insulation exists, a baffle or retainer is installed to maintain insulation application. ❑ Wood - burning fireplaces have gasketed doors and outdoor combustion air. Air Sealing and Insulation: ❑ Building envelope air tightness and insulation installation complies by either 1) a post rough -in blower door test result of less than 7 ACH at 33.5 psf OR 2) the following items have been satisfied: (a) Air barriers and thermal barrier: Installed on outside of air - permeable insulation and breaks or joints in the air barrier are filled or repaired. (b) Ceiling /attic: Air barrier in any dropped ceiling /soffit is substantially aligned with insulation and any gaps are sealed. (c) Above -grade walls: Insulation is installed in substantial contact and continuous alignment with the building envelope air barrier. (d) Floors: Air barrier is installed at any exposed edge of insulation. (e) Plumbing and wiring: Insulation is placed between outside and pipes. Batt insulation is cut to fit around wiring and plumbing, or sprayed /blown insulation extends behind piping and wiring. (f) Comers, headers, narrow framing cavities, and rim joists are insulated. (9) Shower /tub on exterior wall: Insulation exists between showers /tubs and exterior wall. Sunrooms: ❑ Sunrooms that are thermally isolated from the building envelope have a maximum fenestration U- factor of 0.50 and the maximum skylight U- factor of 0.75. New windows and doors separating the sunroom from conditioned space meet the building thermal envelope requirements. Materials Identification and Installation: ❑ Materials and equipment are installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. ❑ Insulation is installed in substantial contact with the surface being insulated and in a manner that achieves the rated R- value. F-1 Materials and equipment are identified so that compliance can be determined. ❑ Manufacturer manuals for all installed heating and cooling equipment and service water heating equipment have been provided. ❑ Insulation R- values and glazing U- factors are clearly marked on the building plans or specifications. Duct Insulation: F-1 Supply ducts in attics are insulated to a minimum of R -8. All other ducts in unconditioned spaces or outside the building envelope are insulated to at least R -6. Duct Construction and Testing: Building framing cavities are not used as supply ducts. ❑ All joints and seams of air ducts, air handlers, filter boxes, and building cavities used as return ducts are substantially airtight by means of tapes, mastics, liquid sealants, gasketing or other approved closure systems. Tapes, mastics, and fasteners are rated UL 181A or UL 181 B and are labeled according to the duct construction. Metal duct connections with equipment and /or fittings are mechanically fastened. Crimp joints for round metal ducts have a contact lap of at least 1 1/2 inches and are fastened with a minimum of three equally spaced sheet -metal screws. Exceptions: Joint and seams covered with spray polyurethane foam. Where a partially inaccessible duct connection exists, mechanical fasteners can be equally spaced on the exposed portion of the joint so as to prevent a hinge effect. Continuously welded and locking -type longitudinal joints and seams on ducts operating at less than 2 in. w.g. (500 Pa). ❑ Duct tightness test has been performed and meets one of the following test criteria: (1) Postconstruction leakage to outdoors test: Less than or equal to 673.9 cfm (8 cfm per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area). (2) Postconstruction total leakage test (including air handler enclosure): Less than or equal to 1010.9 cfm (12 cfm per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area) pressure differential of 0.1 inches w.g. (3) Rough -in total leakage test with air handler installed: Less than or equal to 505.4 cfm (6 cfm per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area) when tested at a pressure differential of 0.1 inches w.g. (4) Rough -in total leakage test without air handler installed: Less than or equal to 337.0 cfm (4 cfm per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area). Heating and Cooling Equipment Sizing: ❑ Additional requirements for equipment sizing are included by an inspection for compliance with the International Residential Code. Cj For systems serving multiple dwelling units documentation has been submitted demonstrating compliance with 2009 IECC Commercial Building Mechanical and /or Service Water Heating (Sections 503 and 504). Circulating Service Hot Water Systems: Project Title: Jaffe Duplex Report date: 02/15/11 Data filename: F: \prj \jaffe2- Lot3FromSarah\ Archive \Progress12- 16- 10 \ResCheck \Jaffe- Lot3.rck Page 3 of 4 • ❑ Circulating service hot water pipes are insulated to R -2. Lj Circulating service hot water systems include an automatic or accessible manual switch to turn off the circulating pump when the system is not in use. Heating and Cooling Piping Insulation: ❑ HVAC piping conveying fluids above 105 degrees F or chilled fluids below 55 degrees F are insulated to R -3. Swimming Pools: ❑ Heated swimming pools have an on /off heater switch. LJ Pool heaters operating on natural gas or LPG have an electronic pilot light. F1 Timer switches on pool heaters and pumps are present. Exceptions: Where public health standards require continuous pump operation. Where pumps operate within solar- and /or waste - heat - recovery systems. F] Heated swimming pools have a cover on or at the water surface. For pools heated over 90 degrees F (32 degrees C) the cover has a minimum insulation value of R -12. Exceptions: Covers are not required when 60% of the heating energy is from site - recovered energy or solar energy source. Lighting Requirements: Fi A minimum of 50 percent of the lamps in permanently installed lighting fixtures can be categorized as one of the following: (a) Compact fluorescent (b) T -8 or smaller diameter linear fluorescent (c) 40 lumens per watt for lamp wattage <= 15 (d) 50 lumens per watt for lamp wattage > 15 and <= 40 (e) 60 lumens per watt for lamp wattage > 40 Other Requirements: 1-1 Snow- and ice - melting systems with energy supplied from the service to a building shall include automatic controls capable of shutting off the system when a) the pavement temperature is above 50 degrees F, b) no precipitation is falling, and c) the outdoor temperature is above 40 degrees F (a manual shutoff control is also permitted to satisfy requirement's'). Certificate: L] A permanent certificate is provided on or in the electrical distribution panel listing the predominant insulation R- values; window U- factors; type and efficiency of space- conditioning and water heating equipment. The certificate does not cover or obstruct the visibility of the circuit directory label, service disconnect label or other required labels. b zo � NOTES TO FIELD: (Building Department Use Only) V, Lon V Project Title: Jaffe Duplex Report date: 02/15/11 Data filename: F: \prj \jaffe2- Lot3FromSarah\ Archive \Progress12- 16- 10 \ResCheck \Jaffe- Lot3.rck Page 4 of 4 2009 IECC Energy Efficiency Certificate Insulation . Ceiling / Roof 49.00 Wall 21.00 Floor / Foundation 38.00 Ductwork (unconditioned spaces): Glass & Door Rating U-Factor SHGC Window 0.30 0.26 Door Cooling Heating & 0.30 0.21 Heating System: Cooling System: Water Heater: Name: Date: Comments: i vs v� C GH tech HEPWORTH- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Hepworth- Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo @hpgeotech.com SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED DUPLEX LOT 3, GLEN LYON SUBDIVISION VAIL, COLORADO JOB NO. 110 364A NOVEMBER 29, 2010 PREPARED FOR: TOM JAFFE 1815 W. GORE CREEK DRIVE, #E VAIL, COLORADO 81657 Parker 303 -841 -7119 0 Colorado Springs 719- 633 -5562 • Silverthorne 970 - 468 -1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ......................................... ............................... - I - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION .................................................. ............................... - 1 - SITECONDITIONS .................................................................... ............................... - 2- GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ........................................................ ............................... - 2 - FIELDEXPLORATION ............................................................. ............................... - 2 - SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ................................................... ............................... - 3 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................. ............................... - 3 - FOUNDATIONS - FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS .......................... ............................... -4- FLOORSLABS ....................................................................... ............................... - 6- UNDERDRAINSYSTEM ....................................................... ............................... -6- SITEGRADING ..................................................................... ............................... -7- SURFACE DRAINAGE - LIMITATIONS........................................................................... ............................... - 8 - FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - SWELL- CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residential duplex to be located at Lot 3, Glen Lyon Subdivision, Vail, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Tom Jaffe dated December 14, 2009. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed duplex will be a three story wood frame structure stepped into the hillside with a garage on the first level of the secondary unit and the main level of the primary unit. Garage floors will be slab -on- grade. Grading for the duplex is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 4 to 12 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re- evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. Job No. 110 364A GEOrtech -2- SITE CONDITIONS The site was vacant of structures and snow cover was about one foot at the time of our exploration. Vegetation consists of sage brush, grass and weeds. The site is located on a north facing hillside and the ground surface slopes down at a grade of about 20 percent in the building area. GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS The site is located on a large alluvial fan that is shown to have moderate hazard debris flow according to the official Town of Vail maps of geologic hazards adopted October 17, 2000. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on November 12, 2010. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a track - mounted CME 45 drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D -1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. Job No. 110 364A GEUf*t@ch -3- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of about one foot of topsoil overlying medium dense, silty sand and gravel with cobbles and probable small boulders. Drilling in the granular soils with auger equipment was occasionally difficult due to the cobbles and boulders. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content, density and percent finer than sand size gradation analyses. Results of swell- consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed drive sample, presented on Figure 4, indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils below topsoil. The soils could tend to compress when wetted and precautions should be taken to prevent wetting below the building. �— The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 ps£ Based on experience, we expect initial settlement of footings designed and Cp Job NO. 11U J04A ygtecn M constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. There could be on the order of 1 inch of additional settlement if the bearing soils FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on -site granular soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the duplex and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure Job No. 110 364A G(~cPtech are wetted. ,\\\2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 42 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 14 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) The topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the relatively dense natural granular soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. If water seepage is encountered in footing areas. we, should be contacted for additional evaluation. A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on -site granular soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the duplex and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure Job No. 110 364A G(~cPtech -5- computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on -site granular soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.45. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 375 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Job No. 110 364A HPtF_-Ch W FLOOR SLABS The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab - on- grade construction. There could be some potential for settlement if the bearing soils are wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free - draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on -site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in mountainous areas that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls and crawlspace areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free - draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum I% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free - draining granular Job No. 110 364A Ge 9tech -7- material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 %2 feet deep. An impervious membrane such as 30 mil PVC liner could be placed below the drain to help prevent wetting below the building. SITE GRADING The risk of construction - induced slope instability at the site appears low provided cut and fill depths are limited. We assume that cut and fill depths for the lower levels will not exceed about 10 to 12 feet. Embankment fills should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil and compacting to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. The fill should be benched into the portions of the hillside exceeding 20% grade. Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation or other means. Potential debris flow impact will be from across Westhaven Circle and on -site grading should direct potential flow down Westhaven Circle and around the proposed building on Lot 3. The grading should be designed by a civil engineer. This office should review site grading plans for the project prior to construction. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the duplex has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in Job No. 110364A GE PtGCh pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free - draining wall backfill should be capped with at least 2 feet of the on- site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re- evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to CVO rvo. 11U (J4A . .., verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Louis E. Eller Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P LEE /ksw cc: Segerberg Job No. 110 364A 15222 �� oAP BONA ttn: Kurt Segerberg GecPtech BORING 1 ELEV.= 8074' S1: :ISI 8075 8070 a� c 0 0 w 8065 PROPOSED FLOOR LEVEL = 81 30/5,10/0 WC =7.2 DD =103 - 200 =40 50/4 PROPOSED FLOOR LEVEL = 8081' 35/6,15/2 8080 WC =3.2 DD =112 -200=18 40/6,10/1 8075 50/5 8070 WC =4.0 LL DD =128 - 200 =23 0 C5 a.> w 50/3 8065 8060 6•uI I 50/5 50/12 8060 8055 1 35/6 ,20/2 8055 WC =5.9 DD =137 - 200 =24 8050 8050 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. H 110 364A C7Q LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 2 He worth — Powlok Geotechnical BORING 2 ELEV.= 8084' :IS LEGEND: TOPSOIL; organic sandy clayey silt, moist, dark brown. SAND AND GRAVEL (SM -GM); silty, cobbles and possible boulder size rock fragments, medium dense, slightly moist to moist, brown. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2 -inch I.D. California liner sample. 50/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 50 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California sampler 12 inches. — 0 Depth at which boring had caved after drilling. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on November 12, 2010 with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( %) DD = Dry Density (pcf) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 110364A I Ge0d>teCh I LEGEND AND NOTES I Figure 3 HonwnrAL_D..wL.L n__a__�_e__i i Moisture Content = 7.2 percent Dry Density = 103 pcf Sample of. Silty Sandy Clay and Gravel From: Boring 1 at 4 Feet 0 1 Compression upon 2 wetting 0 0 U) 2 3 a E 0 U 4 5 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf H 110 364A -- [SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 Hepworth— Pawlak Geotechnical U z J U z U W O ' w V g Q a Ilz 2 O a w 2 Q M O 0 z O r-, LO J D W w L O f - N Q N m n LL O } Q Z) cn w J m LU «i «i O C d � Q 777� o° U V) � v1 LO `0 r. M M cz cn �U V) C7 v) C7 rig C7 v� C7 w ° >_ LL V) (D Z LL � � Oaf a [- N ::D U U X P W Lo z w m w �F Q a ...I J o z ow W N > w ¢ O z N N C) z z � O a 0 < J LU u Z) O M I" 00 C14 zoo r, _ LU �z F -- o N 00 Z z = O Cl. 0 � O J W a C7 g z O m I State of Colorado Asbestos Testing & Abatement Requirements Asbestos testing and abatement protects workers, homeowners, neighbors and emergency services responders from ex- posure to harmful asbestos. It is your responsibility to be in compliance with the State. Please contact the State directly for their requirements at the contact info listed below. When is asbestos testing required? ANY building projects disturbing more than these threshold levels of building materials require asbestos testing: One- and Two - Family Dwellings: 32 square feet All Others (commercial spaces, hotel rooms, etc): 160 square feet Definition of a single - family dwelling: any dwelling unit that is used primarily for a single family, including multi - family /condominium units, and fractional fee units. Asbestos testing results must be provided with your application for a building permit. Tests which identify POSITIVE results at more than 1% require abatement by a State - certified abatement contractor. The air clearance letter or form must be submitted to the Town of Vail before the building permit will be issued. Project Checklist My proje falls into the category checked below: Will not disturb more than the threshold limits identified above. Tested negative, or at 1% or below (1 copies of test results included) Tested positive at more than 1 %, requires abatement (1 copies of test results included) Tips & Facts: • Even recent construction projects may include asbestos - containing materials, so buildings of gny age require testing. • The "1989 Ban" on asbestos - containing materials is commonly misunderstood. "In fact, in 1991 the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated much of the so- called "Asbestos Ban and Phaseout" rule and remanded it to the EPA. Thus, much of the original 1989 EPA ban on the U.S. manufacturing, importation, processing, or distribution in commerce of many asbestos - containing product categories was set aside and did not take effect." - CDPHE Asbestos test results should be submitted to: Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 S Frontage Rd, Vail, CO, 81657. Town of Vail Contact: Fire Prevention Bureau Vail Fire Department 75 S Frontage Rd Fire_ inspectors @vailgov.com 970 - 479 -2252 www.vailgov.com State of Colorado Contact: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Asbestos Compliance Assistance Group 303 - 692 -3158 asbestos@state.co.us www.cdphe.state.co.us 01- Jan -II 05-31-2012 Inspection Request Reporting Page 1 4:54 pm Vail, CO - City Of Requested Inspect Date: Friday,June 01, 2012 Site Address: 1456 WESTHAVEN CR VAIL SECONDARY SIDE/SOUTH SIDE A/P/D Information Activity B11-0068 Type: COMBO Sub Type: ADUP Status: ISSUED Const Type Occupancy: Use: R-3 Insp Area: Owner 1456 VAIL LLC Contractor: SUNDER INC Phone: (970)926-2777 Description: NEW SECONDARY SIDE/SOUTH SIDE Requested Inspection(s) Item 228 FIRE-Final Requested Time: 08:00 AM Requestor Phone: Comments 390-1885 Assigned To ** "*"'" Entered By: MHAEBERLE K Action Time Exp: Item 534 PLAN...gli TGO Requested Time: 08:00 AM Requestor Phone: Comments 390-1885 Assigned To BGIBSON Entered By: MHAEBERLE K Action f? r6.,rt4 Time Exp: nr s ll� (t3 /e45 .�jr /tt'r A c o1 Item 190 ELEC-Final Requested Time: 03:30 PM Requestor Phone: Comments 390-1885 Assigned To JMONDRAGON Entered By: MHAEBERLE K Action Time Exp: Comment GI-CI in all in mech room missing recpt at west slider near kitchen Item 290 PLMB-Final Requested Time: 03:00 PM Requestor Phone: Comments 390-1885 Assigned To JMONDRAGON Entered By: MHAEBERLE K Action Time Exp: Comment hammer arrestors at all quick closing vavles vacuum breaker for house bib in mech room hot and cold reversed at kitchen sink Item 390 MECH-Final Requested Time: 02:30 PM Requestor Phone: Comments 390-1885 Assigned To JMONDRAGON Entered By: MHAEBERLE K Action Time Exp: Comment still need a tix for the dryer vents that do meet code Item 530 BLDG-Temp. C/O Requested Time: 01:30 PM Requestor Phone: Comments 390-1885 Assigned To JMONDRAGON Entered By: MHAEBERLE K Action Time Exp: REPT131 Run Id: 14452 � Community Development Department 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado LISA 81657 TEMPOI�►ARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY This certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of Title 10, Section 10-1-2, ADOPTED CODES of the Vail Town Code certifying that, at the time of issuance, this structure was found to be substantially in compliance with the various ordinances of the town regulating building construction or use for the following: Name and description of project Duplex (South Side � Address of project: 1456 Westhaven Circle Owner name and address: 1456 Vail LLC PO Box 745 Vail Colorado 81658 IBC Edition: 2009 IBC Occupancy Group(s): R-3 Type(s) of Construction: VB Permit Number(s) Bl1-0068 Occupant Load: Expiration Date:_ 6/30/2012 , 1�Iartin aeberle, Building Official SEE ATTACHED CONDITIONS. Sprinkler System Y/N Type: 13R _ 06/01/2012 Date Project #: r'K.) 1 I" BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (Separate applications are required for alarm & sprinkler) Project Street Address: (Number) (Street) (Suite #) Building /Complex Name: Contractor Information Business Name: �NL Business Address: K \3 city GS State: CO zip: Contact Name: Q� Contact Phone: R �G l i Ee w - Contact E -Mail: J 1" 5UAt 0� 0— Ut'��L • X Owner /Owner's prp'senta &vo- signature (Required) Project Information Owner Name: h a (Q ^ � Parcel #: �-►d�� z_ -- Tu �C�Cp (For Parcel #, contact Eagle County Assessors Office at (970- 328 -8640 or visit www.eaglecounty.us/patie) Detailed Scope and Location of Work: DRB #: 1) I �-_) os 1> Q Building Permit #: B I I — 0008, Lot #: 3 Block # Subdivision: Work Class: New ( Addition ( ) Alteration ( ) Type of Building: Single - Family ( ) Duplex (Multi- Family ( ) Commercial( ) Other( ) Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior( ) Both (✓r Valuatioa-of 6 Work Included Plans Included Work Electrical �) es ( )No (_fes ( )No Sf 3 Mechanical ( )Yes ( )No (L -)'?es ( )No Plumbing &_) ( )No (/f es ( )No Building (�'es ( )No ( Yes ( )No E t I Do (o Ord Value of all work being performed: $ `J (value based on IBC Section 109.3 & IRC Section 108.3) Electrical Square Footage 3 Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail,. Colorado .81657; Tel:. 970= 479 - 2128,._ Web: www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator (use additional sheet if necessary) For Offr Use Onl Ce � �� Fee Paid: Received From: Cash Check # CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # exp date: Auth # Date] D.) Tt�(5 CAJ(5—: 6W Ck FEE Po o�) Fee Items- B11 -0068 16:21 04/20/2011 Item # Descri Lion Fee Amount Pmt Amount Balance Account code 10 BUILDING PERMIT FEES $5,281.00 $0.00 $5,281.00 BP 00100003111100 20 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES $900.00 $0.00 $900.00 PP 00100003111100 30 MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES $1,120.00 $0.00 $1,120.00 MP 00100003111100 40 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES ($122.00) $0.00 ($122.00) EP 00100003111100 42 ELEC PERMIT FEES- GFP012 $513.00 $0.00 $513.00 00100003111100, GFP012 47 ELEC PLAN REVIEW $254.15 $0.00 $254.15 PF 00100003112300 80 PLAN CHECK FEES $3,937.65 $0.00 $3,937.65 PF 00100003112300 140 RECREATION FEES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 RF 11100003112700 150 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE $20.00 $0.00 $20.00 WC 00100003112800 160 RESTAURANT PLAN REVIEW $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FS 00100003112400 1205 USE TAX 4% $18,412.00 $0.00 $18,412.0 0 UT 11000003106000 1210 INVESTIGATION FEE BLDG $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PIN 00100003153000 Total Rows: 12 Page 1 07-24-2012 Inspection Request Reporting Page 3 4:28 pm Vail, CO - City Qf Requested Inspect Date: Wednesday, July 25,2012 Site Address: 1456 WESTHAVEN CR VAIL SECONDARY SIDE/SOUTH SIDE A/P/D Information Activity B11-0068 Type: COMBO Sub Type: ADUP Status: ISSUED Const Type Occupancy: Use: R-3 Insp Area: Owner 1456 VAIL LLC Contractor: SUNDER INC Phone: (970)926-2777 Description: NEW SECONDARY SIDE/SOUTH SIDE Requested Inspection(s) Item: 534 PLAN- FINAL C/O Requested Time 08:15 AM Requestor Phone Assigned To BGIBSON Entered By MHAEBERLE K Action Time Exp: Comment A final do approval was granted to the secondary side. gligersv 7/2-64 Inspection History Item: 91 PW-Final driveway grade **Approved** 06/01/12 Inspector: Is Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 532 PW-TEMP. 0/0 **Approved** 06/01/12 Inspector: Is Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 539 PW-FINAL 0/0 **Approved** 06/22/12 Inspector: Is Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING **Approved** 06/16/11 Inspector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED Comment: SECONDARY SIDE FOOTERS COMPLETE 07/11/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: see highlighted plans for progress 05/31/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 20 BLDG-Foundation/Steel **Approved** 06/29/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED Comment: see highlighted plans for progress 07/11/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: see highlighted plans for progress 05/31/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 110 ELEC-Service **Approved** 09/27/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 120 ELEC-Rough **Approved** 09/20/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: undergorund for service laterals 01/05/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED Comment: 01/06/12 Inspector: Martin Action: DN DENIED Comment: Move electrical panel and av panel in fire wall of carsge. Observed on mechanical rough 02/14/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED Comment: panels were incased with 5/8 rock to maintain Martin's request. Item: 200 MECH-Rough **Approved ** 01/06/12- Inspector: Martin Action: DN DENIED Comment: 1. Provide protective plates ay all flue and plumbing plate REPT131 Run Id: 14657