HomeMy WebLinkAboutB11-0135 I
,
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
TOWN OF VAl1 ' � vai�, co s�sss�
TeI: 970.479.2128
www.vailgov.com
Development Revisw Coordinator
TRAN ITTAL FORM
Use this furm when submitting ad � nal information for planning applications or building permits.
This forrn is also used for requesting a revision to building permits. A two hour minimum building review
fee of$1'10 will be charged upon reissuance of the permit.
ApplicatlonlPermit#(s)information applies
ta: Atfention: �Revistons
���' ��3 � -S�YE�T S/. L �Response to Correction Letter
�attached copy of correction letter
�/� ! D� ��. �� � Deferred Submittal
�Other
Project Street Address:
lo��i f D/�`7 �ytD
(Number) (Street) (Sufte#)
Building/Complex Name: Description of Transmittal/List of Changes, Items Attached:
�QA,�iho�/ oF GVL B�r9tit
Appllcant Ir�formaiion
Dn! �oof �G`�1 5/. �
(architect,contractor,ownerlowner's rep)
Contact Name: ..SCO�S, TU�QN/���d �4-!r`�
Address: /�'•O. �dX 3 3 8$
City �r4 L�LE' State: .�O _zip: B/G 3 1
COntaCt Name: ���'e� �-�Z�� (use additional sheet if necessary)
Contact Phone:_�70— `�D �—D2lo 3 Sulkding Permits:
Contad E-Mail: ����� S57�a�a . CA rY� Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations(Labor&Materials)
(DO NOT include original valuation)
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out Building: $
in full the informatian required,completed an accurate plot plan,
and sfate that all the information as required is correct. I agree to P(umbing: $
comply with the information and plot lan, to comply with all Town
ordinances and state laws, and to bu Id this structure according Eledrical: $
to the town's zoning and subdivision des, design review ap-
praved, Intema uilding and R s+dential Codes and other Mechanical: $
ordinances he To applicable khereto.
�( J Total: $�
Owner/Owner's Representative Signature{Required)
�1�r9V/� �Yl�Dw �2 �r.�T�%UR�v/f'SC'L'�y Date Received:
J
For Office Use Onlv:
Fee Paid:
Received From:
Cash Chedc#
CC: Vlsa/MC Last 4 CC# exp,date:
Autf�onration#
�
�--. -.,. ..�.. -y� --•:�.^�v-v--- �v-- .•v-y� f - -•-v'y-. - ti:y:y� ..,.�,.:. .t,.
� �+���, } 'rF i rp{�rfy-�r��r�j�y }jT}i 1•T�r i t t•r P I��r l{ j �f�.�_ . 1. .,..�.i. ..� .,.;,..` f-.�.'..�t��i � � ���(•�( � � � l1 .r;i�(Y
r�i•,���f,J„��l,����!��4�„�j����,4,tle,�I�I,��„I71�11,.���{,J��a7�i���w':���{��� ���4!i � l.�r,�,I��� 4��` S«�+���':'.� 4 ,L��r,!,7,�'. � 5,V�5 �„��� � � �� �d 1 � 1, �.,,.'' :
�.�.�.�� �=.� �-�� .-��,� � t;;�r r� �f� z��t�r.,rrr,, r���.,,;�"�a
•���az'�'�a�i���eF,e,,ti,tf ���e> > t t t ���bt t+�",,�0��4� � � 0 7 �.'� � >>.`•,S°�a�yi}.>.?J.•�r:�s��S��r�,G��U.JJ ���v �. �s > >,•,.V"9:4���:�,�.t�,-<�w- � i-r,
t,;.-.--„• �f<�
�,�=<a l'�i�h�!xr�e w�s�:ee���x-rf�5sicnally�insulatr.�•�.�i��� '�
t�1
- .� ,, Qwens Carning i
:,���
��� INNU�.t11G4SI0FllYING� PROPINK�L77 PINK Fiberglas"" Unbonded Laosefill Insulation i
�',." ;�cb 5:::f:n•�s�; 5
�.� i'Vrrn� �� P r� i
1� ,�:�; �.��.�;:,� t��(� k,e��t �A—� t��-�; v���--
M �.�.V.� � IN•J_ �'1 �� ___ �Al.b� �•D L.� r �
! , �
� T C�wens Corning PR4PINK�'LT7 PINK Fiberglas" Unbonded Loosefill Insulation <
� � �^� _ f ' _ _ - _ S
��^ �•:rCnS CM-'�7•::�h aC:CFtIK•rCE:,:nSibllity whe���he a�•.r�u[�.���NL m:lr;ei x�n:ur�Lr�.-rn �Iin• •��,:Mu I I.:UW.�.i.�Mt M.x�Ye�•.�ws..rofe�.I�•ar..�tu�},Ilir n•�uir� �
�
,:^� numt� � �s;t th,tr.�,;n,::I�55 tM;,n t-a latekd �n mu^n.n:{.neu kist�_it�vc• c':e rec_-ed � r�of tti±s mr�r ek m:.'e 2r-_n F r sper•��.minin'nnu hi.:krwss.
;�` F,eiu�r tYth ^st�flcr.apro�:ic^bath tM1e-e��ed big x-1,;i;�asl:�,c minrn,.-thi;4r,-n•.nn^csul �n .,.or na.ztion �-.�iu� e
( ._�` , , - �
.. ^;;y � . _
\ ;��3 .�e�f.MCrF��.���,.b,w.�l� Atdes floors r
:-�,.. �`I� �1• irko> FAa)f Q�f lliinli hi''vi L'zirl Nnnn bald�ai � 11„Hu�.
�� V� 1� rf R�M Niuro�, ---5<
� .,'..�t hr,u C:�3 i�J�" � Riik� ?K��s�� �rk��p�'1ts tr.�y: rv�4s�.1 r �.U:rA�,n'. � i ne , iu�t 4•iu'�G PG 6r►SiYe�Yq. ..P+10.7�t4 .sk A'i(�A,�, -�<
n •r��r : .. � . "_. . ` ' i .' � � .._ _ . .<6 1 A + �.'S i�lk— �{
1� .�..� RcY7�rt ,�t- i (- .e!! t.'}� �;I 1_i Ji9.. I C�? � <
+\ �-�_�� .. il 11 �� I r.�� S� � .I. 1�: �.S �1�5• 14 �<
\ �� h:urc�ere Dw�;t..�Ct 1 :1L� e.•-F. ,h' � !7<
.�� ' � �: '( _. ..,
.�..° � . .. . . ...� ;. 'i _
.. .....__ .._.__ .'.
��
•' ..�.,
��i.� . . .. , ..
j.�.�; Cstir<-d�wal,�c'�f n. f ° :�., n•7e n , i'�;a G.uliedial Cnlny, _�,�
;�=^i p -.r., n �„t.n ��� �re ->� r .� 7.� i -� �i �X..i.» �tJt�C�ifr ��'tF 1t�3S�� S�,fe'�+�t � '-�'{
:-+:,,.i �- �v .�q ( .: �?: � �, �.� �ikcf &t C R'_f�.... f4 r =<
�t !m�rl r.-aC."f'�k� �I Sk_ , 4 ;W!1�?j, 2 _
vi - . . . UD - _� --i l..i: �E s 1. __ ).:f f�' �<I:9� �8:r .,:o� �<
,�:=� !Utlrrtrp='�'•�:•{ �4tL� �•JS _.I 4.:�1' ..��� ---.I�. � is ie i t� .. I? ��4- 1:1 �� t'..� � �<
=-'..� .U:.d.�cnvtia�f�: �. � — - .i.�)� 1 i - L�� 1:1' '�
�.Vj 1ha115 �
i�� Ru_!a � r���ddi�u�' ��.?� �.,., h+nai. }nitkll�isi4 CuuKv:?�::{��,�,f'1.� r'SIWtY±�}tI'' T .�i.\c.,. -v,r�i;hle i}N., ,. <
'+"^� 1)rrt. �r o�r ,l.nv Yct�"s ��'7aT} [fit�}�(�k.Q`-0 �YN�.i„� �t��!i:s.;' ,,,ppp • �1��� �ll.X� �1��7 �,} -r-1,
�n IJ �s� 6 ��� ��� .tt_ -1�.Vt�{� <.1C..i � �
. ;ij �.rad�o. � : , I � .• �1 13.i _ �. �•.� � j —t
�� .._ .._...._W_.__. ,� - ., J
�....., ; . .� s» i�i s�> (���) --t
� � ; : _4 "LML' b� � 4".C• 4$L 8:=-�_' �VC�.�-PV�/`��s ��1 � -<
=v� . . . - ._ . .._.. _ . . � i�a
�^y ., ,. -t
.�.�-�
;'.�._r�) I��n'>'.'kl ir5uktl�n5 tiyrY In lhcrm7l pcN.�f�ancc�uc t^f-:t^rx such a:a�;M�G ^•@:r:�mperi��rr! ;-si:rmen:.:c-�:b;:an�--cii?�xe tGscretio-a-� ;t�Natio�•=ari�ton,
�`�'._..i=? C.�'�+C:J7'�ll��dSiIOL£�iII�lk._dtlhf�irtS:A14ZCtl1.^.(::'�;:I-a:!Jdn�r�hcn�,l•. •�•rnid ;r•I;:;n,tlL'1' .•t•L 'rilY.•'h.••I:`°I:"1t�X,'f.IfIV.':II�irM1�lIC'fu':IwiS.r.r,1�^ °-1
'�:'.ti �s�—.1
�.�-� . �, , , . , .. . . --C
-� -"' Blanket Insulallon
"r Y'� Bank=Yb^c t+att f:� glais in, a.ibn.•::tcn,^s:n ec ec:o-d�*g t�tMe�^trvXactuicrs rcc.n,--�ndau,, s.•�l:ro�vld:lhCEt3SC r5•'�+alva. 'f:l�rn al53,tavT,• �
,"r�:�J . . . � , . . .. . �
��"� ' , ��:R.VALUF � . , � . . � ... .
; :�� . To��l: nYeu .;:.3 turi:e.:.l i .',F.;�:d: R 39 k.:ifil': Ii-.iS> R'-3fl[: R 7S; ; iS-2A R•?! . it-19 R-IS ". 8-13 fi-I1 .
�;�J . . .. . . .. �
`'> MINIMUN THICKNESS �
,—? i
•.-r� m:i.:;:.I._,. , +5.. d?_°" c.5" c'S' a5" �.S' 3°' ?3" 35" �
.nlrin�r�•Jr.:. •1:�• I,"'.. )"l�j"
�
.'i=d THE FOLLQ1NiNG PRODUCTS HAYE BEE1+I INSTALLED ASSPECIFIEDABOVE: `�,.�-"�-�i
>-'� Krafc Unfaced Fvii FS-25 R-Value Thic{u�ess No.pkgs. CarerageArea ��
�
�.�'7 CeNinss ❑ L� ; : � ❑ '3F' ia�� �d�.t ���
: �_ .
'i�? Cl ❑ ':; i ❑ 0 _ _ _ _ ; �`—'--t,'
.:T=:.+� �`_' �
Y-'� floors ❑ 0 C] Cl ��
��,� O ❑ � ❑ q_-^"'''i
r4 r� �. �f . . . �( . , f'�J-_T•.
>_'.:i wd��5 L '.:�� 0 ❑ .Y-�� +�J��.�.�'����� �.'.�1c�5 �':_^f•�
r`.:. � ❑ :; :�: � 0 . ' ' ' .�^„Y'�
� , . . . . ;. �l����i
��� 1�----- 3'r: " n 3p �--�-�-�t;
,�, 8asemeirt O t� ❑ � a-,.__ ..__ � Q`,�. •
�� C7 O ❑ Q �,�,'
�: Crawispace ❑ p ❑ p _ -�_ . �.
;-`Y=�� ��N�t�.: n . a ❑ o `�:� �c'f�c '� 3.9 ri x�-
. ,�. � =
� �
=•� /�� `,. �Ap��,�y --�{J /
r �• , �.C!��(�i:.CG'r 1�-{iC-X�T 1'"���.� �+IliS�i7W���.�tl!f � b ��ill��(.�tlf — ..... ._.__.. . 1.)GiP ��.��
_� -- ._... __ . .
' =� CC.mrryCn'/ s}-iC"��!�_' CJ;^:��J.^f/ �;
r � f � �i�...x. � , ;+�rrrr• .,=�-:
r - � Pwcit�s5����5 �. �'ll�.l�i1TO � �tiC,U��.�-�.^pG A,;�t��e.;s _ __ __ _ �:
�=s;
_ F'n��C3`'�K�-fx�� �n,i[,.aP � .v n � c.on�prk;r�• `�.:
� _ � ��•;
��'
� -' U7NENS CURNING INSULATING SYSTEMS,LLC .
4 = or.c 0;,�_y5 COr;vIf:G'�=,nKVa'��' �W;
• 'v_C�JrJ.CI IC'.U.''i.4f3u59 'v�uiR��.:61461: V�i�lu�lv�l.'J.+: Jtd'i"I��FI �N�FiPJKF4PJIHEH-"y� G�ji
�'�' � �tr�•GuIC.r;rr'.duwr St�J es;�e All Cidhts Ruservec �
i, � . � 1•600-GET-PINK" �'.951-20C9N.� �: •=�-�
�6IMNU1�fTI01S(vl.WI�4' N'v1�v.rn��enseerning.cam Ihe:cu��iAK�s_nee;:cr:Jtedeirar<ol��.-_�r�Cou�r��..4'�:6C�Ux�er_�cr�nne ��i
�'� •�t�y�.��1i��•�c���7� �'��C.lf.';1.'t;.?r• �t t _ - '"<5.' �'ix�. - n'.�-F'�- �'. - •:�i
( ( ( r.ti, c� ,�•c�" „sr,:�<: 0�;���7�C-' `C',.,.4- .`, '�: �""ry
'i,.�b1�( F �l I rS� �!'i�iO,�;��;o;�);i); :�i:' tr�:��` `t !i��. : .Y,�:�: a Sc�t,';�;7(,a7,.S,'.i"(Ic �`,+'%)(,�.5f: �t+�7.'��+ "a :$Sp�.+
,� �L�A 1 ��� /�,�.�� ��,�� � �� � �l l l •�.��' , � �( r�' �1 � � � 7 � � ,l 1 ,•rl 4�������� ,I � � ����
� 'E ! ��'��.��.�.� 3 ! ! �������.� �1�„ „ �.. � � ( I'I�aJ �'�(��,I I'I I I I„ il� � �.,�„ �.j.l. ('(' " 1
�:��:�.;t,!:�:!�f.�':...(.l.I.I:I ! � �.1.!,;,�:( , �:�.�� l I !_l I ! 1�I I.j.�.,.,`,��..�j,�,4.��.,J�.�..� �:�-.�. �� a��3:':1 �:��� ' ��� � � vl ..j:�����: � _
.. . . .. .:.. . .. . _. . ... ... � 4.. � . ..
. . .... ......
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------. . ... .. . . � �.. .�.. ,�.. .(�(.�1,.� �� _ ( �..
�� ���
/
����
305-7'89-0006
2875 S Raritan St
Englewood, CO 80110
Job Information
Customer Name_Duplex West
Address 616 Forest Road
City Vail State_CO
On 8/ / 5 / 12 Rocky Mountain Insulation Corporation installed Sprayed
Polyurethane Foam Insulation (SPF) at this location.
Area Average Depth Area Average Depth
Ceiling 2" 1021 sqft �
�
�
�
Rocky Mountain Insulation Corporation's SPF, after full curing, will attain an R-Value of R-6.6
per inch.
Installed by: _Ray Shampine
Installer Signature
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
TOWN OF VAIL � va�i, co $�ss�
Tel: 970-479-2128
www.vaifgov.com
Development Review Coordinator
TRANSMITTAL FORM
Revision Submittals:
1. "Field SeY'of approved plans MUST accompany revisions.
2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved&the permit is re-issued.
3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55.00 per hour(2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance.
Permit#(s)information applies to: _ Attention: ( ) Revisions
�j / � � � Z � ( ) Response to Correction Letter
�� � � attached copy of correction letter
� ! i ( _ � f ? � ( ) Deferred Submittal
� % ( ) Other
Project Street Address:
� ���/L��( (Z,�,
(Number) (Street) (Suite#)
Description/List of Changes:
Building/Complex Name: �L�
Contractor Information
Business Name: � (_�� f ( rf � ��'—/�! P�7��� �( �-
Business Address:__��(,7 x 7 � K b
City�ZTj (,;� State: � Zip:�
Contact Name: � ��� � v�[l�
� - ^ � �jry (use additional sheet if necessary)
Contact Phone: �i
� � ��—n;� � ,,n Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor 8�Materials)
Contact E-Mail:__ � L� [ f\l /v`
� (DO NOT include original valuation)
X �/C�� ��~ � Building: $
Owner/Owner's Representative Signature(Required) Plumbing: $
Applicant Information
Electrical: $
Applicant Name:
Mechanical: $
Applicant Phone:
Total: $
Applicant E-Mail:
For Office Use Only:
Fee Paid:
Date Received:
Received From: ���� I� (� ��7 I�
D L�
Cash Check #
CC: Visa/ MC Last 4 CC # exp, date: FEB 2 �3 ZO12
Auth # � �
�
,
" �TOWN O� VAIL
oi-ooc->>
NEWKIRK ENGiNEERiNG
Consulting Structural Engineering
648 Pine Branches Circle,SE
Leland,NC 28451
910-805-6271
December 8,2011
Mr.Jim Turnipseed,Project Manager
Scott S. Turnipseed,AIA
1143 Capitol St., Suite 211
Eagle,CO 81631
RE: Forest Road Duplex
616 Forest Road
Vail, Colorado
Dear Jim:
I understand that it is desired to substitute the following materials for those called out on the
structural drawings: 1) 5/8" CDX plywood roof sheathing; 2) 3/4" Advantex OSB T&G floor
sheathing; 3) 7/16" OSB exterior wall sheathing. These materials are acceptable substitutions. Please
forward this letter to the field after your review.
Sincerely:
NEWKIRK ENGINEERI�(�„��„����
Es,s;%.
� aul Newkirk. .I �;�? �E��F<����'�
�.�;� 23835 x:��
'� Principal 'J ' �
.
��p�., /Z��II :�4�+,`
4'y'�t�•y������'�•Cj�?�
'�y S�OJ�AI.E�,KC�`�r
�'nrnrnnn�u�
� � � � V �
D
DEC 0 8 2011�
TOWN OF �/AIL
NOTE: TH/S PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
,.
�ow�oeu�ri: •
Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road,Vail, Colorado 81657
p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149
COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Permit #: B11-0135
Project #: PRJ11-0226
Job Address: 616 FOREST RD VAIL Applied.....: 05/24/2011
Location......: WEST SIDE Issued... : 07/28/2011
Parcel No....: 210107211005
OWNER PRINCE VICTORIA LLLP 05l24/2011
455 SHERMAN ST
STE 468
DENVER
CO 80203
APPLICANT SCOTT S.TURNIPSEED,AIA 05/24/2011 Phone:(970)328-3900
PO BOX 3388
EAGLE
COLORADO 81631
License:320-A
CONTRACTOR SCOTT S.TURNIPSEED,AIA 05/24/2011 Phone: (970)328-3900
PO BOX 3388
EAGLE
COLORADO 81631
License: 320-A
Description:
NEW DUPLEX
Occupancy: R-3 Type Construction: VB Valuation: $1,400,000.00
......,,....................».......�...x...,...........,,..,..,.,,............... FEE SUMMARY .._..<...,..............,......,.........,....,...,...............,,...........
Building Permit-----------> $7,068.75 Bidg Plan Check----------> $4,594.69 Use Tax Fee-----------------------> $27,800.00
Electrical Permit---------> $460.00 Elec Plan Check-----------> $299.00 Restuarant Plan Review--------> $0.00
Mechanical Permit------> $300.00 Mech Plan Check---------> $75.00 Additional Fees--------------------> $0.00
Plumbing Permit--------> $525.00 Plmb Plan Check---------> $131.25 Recreation Fee--------------------> $651.15
Investigation-----------------------> $0.00
Will Call------------------------------> $20.00
TOTAL PERMIT FEES-------------> $41,924.84
Payments------------------------------> $41,924.84
BALANCE DUE-----------------------> $0.00
...........................................�..............,..,,,,.......x.,.,........,.....,.........,.,,.............,.x.,..........,,.....,.............,........,,..x,....»....,........
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,and state that all the information
as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws,and to build this structure
according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes,design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town
applicable thereto.
REQUEST OR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM
8:00 A -4: 0
� ��
ignature of Owner or Contractor Date
��������
Print Name
combination permit_012811
, �
�
���t�+I YL'��L •
,x..........................................................................x........,,..........,..,,......,..,....................,...,,,........,.,....,,................,.....,.,
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF
Permit#: B11-0135 Address: 616 FOREST RD VAIL
Owner: PRINCE VICTORIA LLLP Location:
WEST SIDE
.....�........................................................�.,...........,.,.................,.........,..,.,............,..,,.........,,..,,.....,,..........,.,,......,.........
Cond: CON0011964
Verifcation of crawl space height required prior to framing
inpsections
Cond: CON0012029
Fire sprinkler and alarm system is required
Cond: 42
(BLDG 2009) CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS REQUIRED TO BE
INSTALLED PER 2009 IRC R315
Cond: CON0012026
Cond: CON0012028
All new trees shall be no closer than 10' from edge of
roadway to drip line
combination permit_012811
t
�
���� I� �
*****************************�,.********«**«**,.«******«*****««*****,+*«*****���***«*«*«*.,*******************«*«*****��«**«*******...,*««*,,,+,+*..****.,««**..
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES
Permit#: B11-0135 Address: 616 FOREST RD VAIL
Owner: PRINCE VICTORIA LLLP Location:
WEST SIDE
«**********«.,*************.***�*************..*.****«******,�***«*.,**«*****��*********««*.,******�.,««*«*****«.,*****�*********«�***.,*.*��**.,«***.*******
Item: 00010 BLDG-FOOTING
Item: 00020 BLDG-Foundation/Steel
Item: 00210 PLMB-Underground
Item: 00021 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan
Item: 00022 PLAN-ILC FRAMING
Item: 00120 ELEC-Rough
Item: 00200 MECH-Rough
Item: 00220 PLMB-Rough/D.W.V.
Item: 00230 PLMB-Rough/Water
Item: 00240 PLMB-Gas Piping
Item: 00310 MECH-Heating
Item: 00410 Special Inspect-progress rept
Item: 00030 BLDG-Framing
Item: 00050 BLDG-Insulation
Item: 00060 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail
Item: 00290 PLMB-Final
Item: 00390 MECH-Final
Item: 00420 Special Inspect-final rept
Item: 00503 PW-Final Driveway Grade
Item: 00190 ELEC-Final
Item: 00090 BLDG-Final
combination permit_012811
*******************�*****+*******************�**********************************************
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement
****************************************+*****�***+*+**********************++******+****�***
Statement Number: R110000872 Amount: $38, 829.0307/28/201101:52 PM
Payment Method: Check Init: LC
Notation: #1007 / SCOTT S.
TURNIPSEED AIA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permit No: B11-0135 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT
Parcel No: 2101-072-1100-5
Site Address: 616 FOREST RD VAIL
Location: WEST SIDE
Total Fees: $41, 924.84
This Payment: $38, 829.03 Total ALL Pmts: $41, 924.84
Balance: $0.00
*************�*�**+*************************************************************************
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Current Pmts
-------------------- ------------------------------ ------------
00100003111100, GFPO ELEC PERMIT FEES-GFP012 565.00
BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 7, 068.75
EP 00100003111100 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 460.00
MP 00100003111100 MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES 300.00
PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 2, 004 .13
PP 00100003111100 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES 525.00
RF 11100003112700 RECREATION FEES 651.15
UT 11000003106000 USE TAX 4% 27,235.00
WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 20.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
i - - -
�311 -oi3�
,
.
TQWNOFDAIL � SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING SCHEDULE
i
��� ��� ��IBC 1704) Perm�t#
I Project Name:
� Owner's Name:
�
j Testing lnspettr�n Sign ur � Print Name Date
� � � ����j� ����
Agency:
I Testing Inspection Signature Print Name Date
Hereby certifies that the Testingllnspection Agency named above has been engaged to pertorm structural tests and
i inspections during construction as checked below,to satisty all applicable portions of the Building Code.
Prior to final inspection, the Inspection Agency shall submit a statement that all items of designated work pertormed
were reported. Any items checked but not tested or inspected will be noted and explained. Whenever any designated
items on the list are ready for sampling,testing, or inspection, it shall be the responsibility of the contractor to give
I timely notice to the inspection agency so ihat the required services may be pertormed.
i REINFORCING STEEL: UNDERPINNING:
Tensile 8 Bend,one set per heat per tons Temporary/Permanent
� _ Inspection of Placement Inspeetion of Steel Fabrication
I Inspection_qf Welding Inspection of Reinforcing 8 Forms
i � EPo��� � Inspection of Concrete Placement
; Inspection of Tiebacks
� MASONRY:
� _ Prel�m.Acceptance Tests{Masonry Units,Wail Prisms) SOIL NAILS:
! _ Subsequent Tests(MorNar,Grout,Field Wal'�Prisms) Temporary Shoring
_, Inspection of Placement and Grouting Permanent Wall
ICONCRETE SNOTCRETE GROUT AND MORTAR: STRUCTURAL STEEI:
Concrete Shot Groul Mortar Sample&Test(List specifiC members below)
Aggregate tests for design Shop Identification&Welding InspeCtion
Suitabiury or a�regaces Shop Ultrasonic lnspection
Miz Designs Shop Radiography
Test Panei ��pZ Field Welding Inspectio
Batch Plant Inspectbn �p Field Bolting Inspection5�
� __. _ Cement Grab Sample Field URrasonic Inspection
; Inspact Pfadn9 Field Radiography
Compression Tesls Metal Oeck Wetdi�g Irtspection
Cast Specimens FIREPROOFING
' Pick-up Samples Inspection 8,Placement
Shrinkage Bars
� Yield Chsck _� SOILS:
ar Cneck Acceptance Tests
Dry unit Weight � Moisture-Densi eterminatio�
PRECAS7 CONCRETE: Field Densiry
_ Reinforcing Tests Drilled Piers
_ Inspection of Reinforcing Placement Deep Foundation
Tendon Tests
_ Inspection of Tendon Placement STRUCTURAL WOOD;
_ Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspection of Fabrication
Inspection of Concrete Batching Inspection of Truss Joint Fabrication
� InspeCtion of Panel Attachment&Inserts Sample 8 Test Components
_ Cort�ression Tests Inspection of Glu Lam Fabrication
_ Inspection of Stressing/Trensfer
PILING,CAISSONS,CAPS,TIES: SMOKE CONTROL:
_ Inspection of Reinforcing Placement SPECIAL CASES:
_ Inspection of Concrete Placemsnt
_ Inspection of Concrete Batching SPECIAL INSPECTION:
S ecil other tests,ins Seismic Resistance
P Y pectronsorspecielinstructionsrequired. WindRequirements
-4- � C� C� (� � MC
JUL 14 2011
TOWN OF VAIL
Job Name:
t, Job Address: '�Oi� �
T�WN OF VAIL '
Permit No.:
SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTfNG AGREEMENT
(7o applicants of projects requiring Special Inspection or Testing per Seotion 1701 of the IBC}
The owner or his/her representative, on the advice of the design professional in responsible charge, shall
complete, seal, sign and submit a copy of the Special Inspection Agreement and Structural Tests
Scheduled to the Town of Vaii for review and approval. Signatures are required on both pages;
photocopied or faxed signatures are acceptable.
The owner and his/her general contractor, where applicable, shall also adcnowledge the following
conditions applicable to Special Inspection Testing:
1. Contractor is responsible for proper notification to the Inspection or Testing agency for items
listed.(Page 1) (IBC 1704)
2. Only the testing laboratory should take samples and transport them to their laboratory.
3. Copies of all laboratory reports and inspections are to be sent directly to the Town of Vail by the Testing
agency on a weekly basis.
4. Inspection agency to submit names and qualifications of on-site special inspectors to the Town of Vail
for review and approval.{Page 2}
5. The special inspector is responsibfe to immediately notify the Town of Vail Building O�cial in wrifing of
any concerns and/or problems encountered.
6. It is the responsibility of the contractor to review the Town of Vail approved plans for additional
inspection or testing requirements that may be noted. A pre-construction conference at the job site is
recommended to review special inspection procedures.
7. The special inspector shall use only the Town of Vail approved drawings.
8. All special inspection field reports must be left on site for review by the Town of Vail staff prior to
required inspections or re-inspections.
BEFORE OCCUPANCY WILL BE GRANTED: The special inspection agency shall submit a signed and
sealed statement that all items requiring testing and inspection were fulfilled and reported. Those items not
tested and/or inspected shall be noted in this statement. A copy of the statement shall be maintained at the
job site for the Building Inspector's review prior to final inspection.
Acknowledgement:
Owner:
Signature Print Name
Date
Special lnsp o /' �(��V�n
Agency: Z �C �1 ' S 7` _//
Signature rint Name
PfOj@Ct Date
Arch/Eng: ��P�a� ��,
Signature' Print Name �
Da e
Contractor.
Signatura Print Name
Date
-3-
------______
�
Job Narne:
��OFy� i JobAddress: f 0(�� '�
Permit No.:
SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT
(To applicants of projects requiring Special Inspection or Testing per Section 1701 of the IBC)
The owner or his!her representative, on the advice of the design professional in responsible charge, shali
cornplete, seal, sign and submit a copy of the Special Inspection Agreement and Structural Tests
Scheduled to the Town of Vail for review and approval. Signatures are required on both pages;
photocopied or faxed signatures are acceptable.
The owner and his/her general contractor, where applicable, shall also acknowledge the following
conditions appiicable to Special Inspection Testing:
1. Contractor is responsible for proper notification to the Inspection or Testing agency for items
listed.(Page 1) (IBC 1704)
2. Only the testing laboratory should take samples and transport them to their laboratory.
3. Copies of al� laboratory reports and inspections are to be sent directly to the Town of Vail by the Testing
agency on a weekly basis.
4. Inspection agency to submit names and qualifications of on-site special inspectors to the Town of Vail
for review and approval.( Page 2)
5. The special inspector is responsible to immediaiely notify the Town of Vail Building Official in writing of
any concerns and/or problems encountered.
6. It is the responsibility of the contractor to review the Town of Vail approved plans for additional
inspection or testing requirements that may be noted. A pre-construction conference at the job site is
recommended to review special inspection procedures.
7. The special inspector shall use only the Town of Vail approved drawings.
8. All special inspection field reports must be leff on site for review by the Town of Vail staff prior to
required inspections or re-inspections.
BEFORE OCCUPANCY WILL BE GRANTED: The special inspection agency shall submit a signed and
sealed statement that all items requiring testing and inspection were fulfiiled and reported. Those items not
tested and/or inspected shall be noted in this statement. A copy of the statement shall be maintained at the
job site for the Building Inspector's review prior to final inspection.
Acknowledgement:
Owner:
Signature ____,�_
-� Print Name
Speciallnsp 'o Dafe
Agency: � Cs(�C UJ�1n
S. (C �i 1 /�S �`� -l/
PfojeCt rint Name Dafe
Arch/Eng: �„J���l�*� � � �� C�
Pnnt Name Dale
Contractor: �,p�,�p,���
sig l-� --_.�� ' � 1
Print Name Date
-3-
�
Job Name:
�m ' Job Address:
1����V� , Permit No.:
SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT
(To applicants of projects requiring Special Inspection or Testing per Section 1701 of the IBC)
The owner or his/her representative, on the advice of the design professional in responsible charge, shall
complete, seal, sign and submit a copy of the Special Inspection Agreement and Structural Tests
Scheduled to the Town of Vail for review and approval. Signatures are required on both pages;
photocopied or faxed signatures are acceptable.
The owner and his/her general contractor, where applicable, shall also acknowledge the following
conditions applicable to Special Inspection Testing:
1. Contractor is responsible for proper notification to the Inspection or Testing agency for items
listed.(Page 1) (IBC 1704)
2. Only the testing laboratory should take samples and transport them to their laboratory.
3. Copies of all laboratory reports and inspections are to be sent directly to the Town of Vail by the Testing
agency on a weekly basis.
4. Inspection agency to submit names and qualifications of on-site special inspectors to the Town of Vail
for review and approval.( Page 2)
5. The special inspector is responsible to immediately notify the Town of Vail Building Official in writing of
any concerns and/or problems encountered.
6. It is the responsibility of the contractor to review the Town of Vail approved plans for additional
inspection or testing requirements that may be noted. A pre-construction conference at the job site is
recommended to review special inspection procedures.
7. The special inspector shall use only the Town of Vail approved drawings.
8. All special inspection field reports must be left on site for review by the Town of Vail staff prior to
required inspections or re-inspections.
BEFORE OCCUPANCY WILL BE GRANTED: The special inspection agency shall submit a signed and
sealed statement that all items requiring testing and inspection were fulfilled and reported. Those items not
tested and/or inspected shall be noted in this statement. A copy of the statement shall be maintained at the
job site for the Building Inspector's review prior to final inspection.
Acknowiedgement: L , --7/�
Owner: ''>ti��'��_ �/�� �r i l!%�i'llC I ,/�,�G(.l�i�r f"�'�CC"r'�' Q; l�; , '� '��
Signatur' � ,/ Print NamJ��� �Date
ti
Special Inspection
Agency:
Signature Print Name Date
Project
Arch/Eng:
Signature Print Name Date
Contractor:
Signature Print Name Date
'' s �_ „ ` ' ' �` : Departm�r�t of Comtl;iun�ty=Devel.opsne_n� '.
K -`" �„;t =� � - � � � �, - _ .7�5 Sau�h Fron�age Road :
a. �`_ - - �,.° � _ - � Va�1, �olorac�q 8�fi��'=�
-�.� ` _ , �� ;
F�. , =1 k . s �s �j., �
�,. 3. � ; y � � -�K„ -ty�G3�'�'�
L"�i ,^ - ,, s -. _ r 3-- -y . e .� 9����7 � r(
��� - � � r r a"° Y ` .� ,,; � `�'� �F��C"��7�-���1�4��r�
� � „ ���f �- ~ .._� ., � -.�, �� _ _.�{;,��. K._ �y' �, -.�c,-�+�-"" ''� ;
' s � � ' �YVEb�jWV1�1�,.�a#�33„����
. L Y
_�� _� ���.-�~�� '� - = D�ve.l��irten���€��'��t�-rs��;:�
�
�„ "�- x�.�..-�,� , � „ �'�-,�-� €'' � ��-��a
,�t_ �- �-
-,(��a�'y����,.� '�'���-"��'-s„r-�S��A"Tr '.�'�y,1��'��a.';.,.�=� �*s'_���_z.'�—'�-..-o;`'�T�.°` . ,. � ,�..�.,"s-�"`;L"'� G�`��i�� ��=a�: �_.
Si N
TRANSMlTTAL FORM ;
Revision Submiftals: ,
1. "Fie1d Sei" of approved plans MUST accompany revisions_
2. No further inspections wili be performed until the revisions are approved 8�the permit is re-issued_ i
3_ Fees for reviewing revisions are$55_00 per hour(2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. �
;Permit#(s)information app[ies{o_ Attention: O Revisions '
: (� Response to-Correction Letter
' �L:��L — �,�� 3 (�J(1/ �> � _attached copy of correction fetEer
i
! ERSr' �6Sr ( ) Deferred Submittal I
( } Other � ;
;
Project Street Address � i
: �-� 1 � ��i {�� s Description!List of Changes_ ,
� Y i
�(Numbe�) (Street) (Suite#) _ �
k �
f � )
i Building/Complex Name: ; ' '
i � I
f Confact Informafiorr_-- � /� � - , �
� ��2�Gti M � � ��_�,� �
�
Company_ �/"�if/J � r=� ? 2� _ E ;
1�' �[,
!Company Address: � �
4
i Ciy: State: Zip: '
;Contact Name: ;
�
I
;Contact Phone: - ,
' E-Mail
i i
....�___-__ - __...�.r+..w.�...,, . .Y t �'�
�Revised ADDITIONAL Va(uations(Labor 8�Matecials} �
;(DO NOT include onginal valuation) ;
'
� �
' Buiiding: � ;(use additionai sheet rt necessary) '
.
i--- - - - ------___----=-- ,
�Plumbing: $ � I
, ;Date Rec � � �� � �n � �
! Electncai:
� � � ��� �
I
;MechanicaL $ '
� JUL 0 6 2011
�
�.Tetal: �
i TOWN OF VAIL �
,,
;
,
Scott S.Turnipseed,AIA
::;*hii[Mi �an-;ir!:���r r rc�ne�ir7n
July 5, 2011
Martin Haeberle
Town of Vail
Community Development Department
75 South Frontage Road West _ __.
Vail, Colorado, 81657 � � � a � �'
D
Response to Permi eview Comments ��� 0 6 2011
Building Permi #Bl 1-0134/135
616 Forest Road �pWN OF VAIL
Martin:
The following responses, shown in bold, address the comments in your letter of June 8,
2011. Also we have included four complete, revised sets of drawings.
BUILDING COMMENTS:
Architectural Comments:
General:
1. All plan sheets to be signed and dated per the State of Colorado.
The four sets of revised drawings have all of the sheets stamped and signed.
2. Provide Plans and specifications for the required radon system per Appendix F of the
IRC.
Plans and specifications for the proposed radon mitigations system have been
added to sheet Ml.l, the First Level Mechanical Plan.
3. Provide a window and door schedule on the plans showing the location and u value
of glazing per the submitted REScheck program.
A complete window and door schedule, from the manufacturer, is attached with
the location and u value for all openings.
Sheet A 1.1:
l. Provide engineered design for boulder walls four feet or taller per Town of Vail
amended code section 1603.2 IBC.
There are no boulder walls over four feet tall, see sheet Al.l, Site Plan.
2. Provide engineer design for the proposed retaining walls exceeding four feet and or
supporting surcharge.
Refer to details 13, 14, 15, and 16 on structural detail sheet 52.2 for the
construction of the proposed concrete retaining walls. These details are now
referenced on the site plan, sheet Al.l.
Structural Comments:
General:
1. Provide structural design criteria or structural calculations identifying a11 design
criteria in compliance with the building code.
The structural design criteria,which was originally indicated on sheet 52.1, is
now shown on sheet 52.4. Please note that the snow load criteria has been
revised, and also see sheet 51.5 for upgraded snow loads to accommodate
potential drifting snow.
2. Identify on plans all required special inspections per the IBC and include a special
inspection agreement available on the Town of Vail web page.
A table indicating all special inspections requirements is shown on sheet 52.4.
The special inspections agreement will be provided prior to issuance of permit.
Plumbing Cotnments:
Sheet A 1.1:
1. Revise plans to show building sewer being provided from the public utility on each
individual property. Reference section 701.3 IPC.
Separate sewers are now shown for each individual property on sheet Al.l, and
are referenced to section 701.3 IPC.
Mechanical Comments:
Sheet M1.3:
1. Indicate on plans the proposed cfin for the kitchen hoods to identify the need for
outside air. Reference section 505.2 IMC.
Sheet M1.3 has been revised to show the cfm capacity for the kitchen hoods and
section 505.2 IMC has been referenced.
Electrical Comments:
General:
1. Identify on plans the locations of the required CO detectors per the IRC.
The electrical plans have been revised to show required CO detectors per the
IRC.
PLANNING COMMENTS:
1. The area of the west garage was expanded in order to address building height issues, ,
however the cover sheet still identifies the garage area as 600 square feet. I believe '
this garage may exceed 600 square feet resulting in the need for a new GRFA '�,
analysis to be performed. Please revise the cover sheet and provide a new GRFA �
analysis. From the cover sheet calculations the secondary unit is at the allowable i,
maximum for GRFA. I will be looking to see how the expansion of the garage
square footage is accounted for and affects the allowable GRFA for the site and the
secondary unit.
The size of the west unit garage was not expanded. When the west garage door
was pulled out, to rectify the height issues, the corresponding opposite wall was
also reconfigured to maintain the size of the garage. Please refer to previous
drawings for comparison and/or measure the garage to verify actual area.
2. Please provide a cut sheet of the proposed light fixture in order for staff to determine
that the light fixture will comply with the 14-10-7, Outdoor Lighting, Vail Town
Code.
A cut sheet is attached but does not show the reflector which provides t6e Dark
Sky compliance. We are waiting for a detail drawing from the manufacturer
and it will be provided before permit issuance.
3. Please show the gutters and downspouts on the elevation plans.
Drawings have been revised to show gutters and downspouts on the roof plan
and exterior elevations.
4. Please show the snow guards on the elevations or roof plans.
All snow guards are indicated on the roof plan.
FIRE COMMENTS:
Pending
PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS:
1. All trees shall be 10 feet minimum from the edge of roadway to drip line.
Any trees planted within the right of way shall 10 feet minimum from edge of
roadway to drip line.
2. Provide stamped plans/clacs for all walls 4 feet or greater in height, including boulder
walls.
Refer to details 13, 14, 15, and 16 on structural detail sheet 52.2 for the
construction of the proposed concrete retaining walls. These details are now
referenced on the site plan, sheet A1.1. There are no proposed boulder walls
over 4 feet high.
3. Revocable permit required for private improvements located in Town Right of Way.
An application for"Revocable Permit to Erect or Maintain Improvements on a
Public Right-of-Way"was submitted to public works on June 23.
Hopefully I have interpreted your comments correctly, and have provided you with
everything you need to be able to issue a permit.
i
Thanks for your time, I
„
'�� .. c . . . � t . � _ . _ .._. _,
Dave Madow '
c.c. Scott Turnipseed
Jim Turnipseed
i
I
t
� Sierra Pacific Windows
�' _.
A Division of Sierra Paci�c Industries
�;' 1121 Singletree Road, Box 2040
Edwards, Colorado 81632-2040
s����oa� 970-926-3715(Phone)
�N 970-926-3745(Fax)
June 13, 2011
CUSTOMER ACCEPTANCE COPY �.ss.3
3/31/2011
Order Number 90303690
Terms: Net 30 Days
Required Deposit: 50.00
PO#:
Job#:
Permit No#:
Box Screens: No
Box Hardware: Yes
So/d To: Ship To:
SCOTT S TURNIPSEED ARCH AND FOREST ROAD DUPLEX WEST
CONST 616 FOREST ROAD
BOX 3388 VA�L, CO 81657
EAGLE, CO 81631
(970)328-3900-Work
(970)328-3901-Fax
{970)390-712&Cell
WALLY SCHAUB
— Order Check List -
(970)390-7128-Cell
WALLY SCHAUB
Page 1 of 10
Direct Ship: No
Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 6
Tract Number: BLOCK 1
Property Location: 616 FOREST ROAD
LOT 5
VAIL, CO 81657
Property Owner:
PRINCE VICTORIA LLLP
455 SHERMAN STREET
SUITE 468
DENVER, CO 80203
MAGGIE MORRISSEY
Lender.
Species Jamb Size Drawing Page(s) Owners ManuaUSPW Warranty Color(Clad) 007 Gull Gray
i Quantity Primed vs Clear O/S Purchase lead time Installation Instructions
;� Operation Exterior Trim O/S Purchase warranty No Shop Drawings Required
i Rough Opening Hardware WUI Compliant Exterior
( ) (Interior) Distressed
�' Glazing/Lites Screens Terms and Conditions Colonial Contemporary
� Wananty Information —
�I Limited Warranty
', (Applies to these line item numbers)
No Warranty
(Applies to these line item numbers)
(This order is subject to the terms and conditions printed on the back page.Please read them before signing.)
Customer Signature
Sales Rep Signature
Spencer Butts
Date
Order Summary
Net Total
4.40 Tax Rate
Labor Charge
Order Total
$42,816.23
$ 1,883.91
$2,240.00
$46,940.14
', , ' Rough Opening � i
' Width x Hei ht �
i itm i Qty Product Code , (�nchesl 9 Oper Sym
�� -- ------ --------- ---
7--- ---
' 1 i 1 GAC-30542 BO 3/4 x 54 3/4 LR
� Aspen Casement
!
U-factor:0.30
SHGC:0.16
2 1 C-AC-3060-3 * 90 3!4 x 60 3/4 LSR
Aspen Casement
I i
I U-factor:0.30
SHGC:0.16
i 31 1 C-AG3060-3 90 3/4 x 60 3/4 LSR
I Aspen Casement �,
,� I' I
I U-factor.0.30 �
I � SHGC:0.16 I
'ir 4 1 SPWNVEILAND HYBRID'
i � DOOR
!i �, OS Doors ,
� 'Priced By Factory
--- ----
5; 1 C-ACP-4130-1 { 123 3/4 x 30 3/4 S
i Aspen Casement Picture I
Mulled Unit
I ••First Rem in unit I
U-factor:0.28 i
SHGC:0.20
i� 6; 1 C-ACP-4130.1 I ->See item#5 S
�I I Aspen Casement Pidure i
i ->See item#5 !
I U-fador:0.28
I SHGC:0.20 _
7: 1 C-ACP-4130-1 ->See item#5 S
I �qspen Casement Picture
; �.
� � ->See item#5
( U-factor.0.28 '
SHGC:0.20 _
8 1 GAC-3060-1 ! 120 3/4 x 60 3/4 L
I Aspen Casement ;
I j
Mulled Unit ,
••First item in unk I
U-factor:0.30 j
SHGC:0.16 ,
Location
BEDROOM 5
Glaze
Options
j Vent Tubes
'�SIM DL
�LoE'-366
iLoE-i81
-- i------
�BEDROOM 4 ��Insulated
' ,Vent Tubes
�,SIM DL
'I LoE'-366
I7emp int
I LoE-i81
i BEDROOM 3 Ilnsulated
IVent Tubes
� �51M DL
I �LoE'-366
'�Temp I�t
I LoE-i81
�
rKITCHEN i
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
BEDROOM 2
i
�Insulated
'Vent Tubes
ISIM DL
i LoE'-366
ITemp Int
Insulated
Vent Tubes
SIM DL
LoE'-368
Temp Int
LoE-i81
Insulated
Vent Tubes
SIM DL
LoE'-368
Temp Int
LoE-i81
Insulated
Vent Tubes
SIM DL
LoE'-366
Temp Int
LoE-i81
Order Number 90303690 Page 2 of 10 Initials:
� Hardware T Exterior s� Additional�
-, Lite or I : i T---
�, Grille I
I 2W 2Httem--- Bronze - ,No Brickmould -sinche6', i Clad Op�ons___}_
'Equal II-HaMware No 5ili Nose Guil Gre �
I Non-Stndrd �i Bronze j ! i Pine
�Colanial I�-Screen i �i �Designer Sash �
!7/8" I� � '� 'Clear Int.
' , � Colnl Profile j
- I------ ------ - --i
�------
i 2W 3H li8ronza No Brickmould r6 11/16" Clad:7 - -
Equal ;-Hardware �No Sili Nose � Guil Gray
Non-Stndrd ',Bronze ' i Pine
Cobnial I-Screen i Designer Sash
7/8" I� Clear Int.
�I Colnl Profile '
--�-- --*--}-
�.2W 3H �Bronze I No Brickmould I 6 11/16" i Clad:7 I
,Equal ;-Hardware il No Sill Nose I Gull Grey ;
Non-Stndrd Bronze , Pine
�Cobnial !-Screen I � Designer Sash I
j 7/8" i I� ' i Ciear Int. II
— -- i �Colnl Profile
�
I1221/2X
�100 13116
MODEL 807
� XXXP !
�
—j-----r--- -----i
i 3W 2H I No Herdware 'i No Bridcmould � 6 11/16" Cled�7 ,
i Equal �!No Screen No Sill Nose Gull Gray �
I Non-Stndrd I ' Pine
��Colonial � � i Designer Sash �
i 7/8" II � Clear Int i
I I Colnl Profile I
I,3W 2H No Hardware !No Brickmould I 8 11/16" Clad:7 i
!Equal j No Screen �No Sill Nose Gull Grey
Non-Stndrd I �Pine �
�,Cobniai i � Designer Sash I
�I 7/8" I ! j �Clear Int. �I
, , ', Colni Profile
�
i -+------ �—----- ; - - i
!3W 2H-- I No Hardware �No Brickmould 'I 6 11/16"�Clad:7--- -?
I Equal ',I No Screen I No Sill Nose , I Guli Gray '
j Non-Stndrd ' Pine I
Colonial I �Designer Sash !
�'I 7/8 i I i Clear Int.
Colnl Profile
,___---
q � i I - t--- -----
E ual ��-Hardw�are �No Si11 Nose---*I 8 11H6" I Clad.7 ;
r- - �--- �Guli Gray I
'i 2W 3H Bronze No Bnckmould �I
�,Non-Stndrd Bronze '� ' Pine
I Colonial -Screen Designer Sash i
'i 7/8" ' Ctear Int. !
�I I Colnl Profile ;
Itm II C1Ly Product Code
8 1 C-ACP-606U-1------
Aspen Casement Picture
->See item#8
� U-factor:0.28
� SHGC_0.22--_------
10 1 C-AC-3060-1
Aspen Casement
->See item#8
I U-factor.0.30
I SHGC:0.16
11� 1 C-ID-3696-1 —---
i i Inswing Door
U-factor:0.30
, SHGC:0.14
Rough Ope�ing
Width x Height� Oper Sym
(Inchesl
---- -- -__--
->See item#8 iS
->See item#8
~ 38 7/16 x 98 1/2
12� 1 I GAC-3036-2
Aspen Casement
i
U-factor:0.30
SHGC:0.16
13 1 GAG24241 -----�,
iAspen Casement ',
� U-factor:0.30 ,
SHGC:0.16 �
14 1 GAG24241 ',
Aspen Casement I
U-fador:0.30 i
i � SHGC:0.18
i I
_�_ _- �;
t--------
15j 1�C-AG24241 j 24 3/4 x 24 3/4 IR
; iAspen Casement
60 3/4 x 36 3/4
24 3/4 x 24 3/4
24 3/4 x 24 3/4 �S
U-fector:0.30
SHGC:0.16
1 C-AG24241
Aspen Casement
U-factor:0.30
SHGC:0.16
243/4x243/4 IL
Locatbn
BEDROOM 2
BEDROOM 2
Order Number 90303690 Page 3 of 10 Initiais:
— ------ ---_ _ __-- -�----
- -- --�-------
� Lite or , i � � �-�—
Glaze � Griile Ha�� ' Exterior I Siu � Ad Pkional �
Opt�ons ' Pattern I Y-----Trim _', (inches) O tlons
am
- �--- I y fi—
-----
insulated i 1 Lite No Hardware I No Brickmould �6 11/16 �Clad.7 �
iVent Tubes No Screen !No Sill Nose j Gull Gra ��
ILoE'-366 i I Pine '
ITemp Int i I Designer Sash
'Vent Tubes
!SIM DL
'LoE'-386
,Temp Int
� I I Clear Int i
- i ---- � i Colnl Profile I
�-- . ------1
2W 3H Bronze i No Brickmould I 6 11/16" �Clad 7 I
Equal �-Hardware I No Sill Nose 'I Gull Gray �I�
Non-Stndrd i Bronze � � ��Pine I
Colonial Screen '� Designer Sash
7/8" I,I � �Clear Int.
� Colnl Profile I
- � -- -- �
I BEDROOM 2 ilnsulated �i 2W 4H �Munchen/374 i No Brickmould ! 6 11/16" Clad:7 '
�� ITempered I Equal ',OR Bress I� � Gull Grey
�Vent Tubes Non-Stndrd ',-Trim Set � i Doug Fir
II ISIM DL !Cobnial OR Brass ! �Gear Int
, 'LoE'-366 ;7/8" -Hinges ' �
!,LoE-i81 j Brown-Qbn i I
i�Head:4 5/8
ii Stile:4 5/8 � i i
� Kick:6 13/16 i
! I I
�
, I
� T..--p - --'q----- Y------- -4 ------- -- --------�
�BATH 2 �Insulated !2W 2H Bronze I No Brickmould li 6 11/16" Clad:7 �
� Tem ered E ual Hardware 'No Sill Nose i i Guli Grey i
; Vent Tubes :Nor�Stndrd ;Bronze I !Pine
�SIM DL I Cobnial '-Screen I i Designer Sash �
�I �,LoE'-366 I 7/8" ' '� Clear I�t. �
BATH 2 TEMP
!BATH 2
TOILET 2
j POWDER
!LoE-i61
!Insufated
;Tempered
'Vent Tubes
�SIM DL
IVent Tubes
!SIM DL
I LoE'-366
Temp Int
,LoE-i81
�-------
Insulated
�iVentTubes
i51M DL
j LoE'-368
'Temp Int
',LoE-i81
I�-------
Insulated
IVent Tubes
�SIM DL
�I LoE'-368
�ITemp Int
��LoE-i81
� i I Colnl Profile
2W 2H---- I No H� ardware No Brickmould I� 6 11/16" Clad:7 -.
�-----
Equal 'No Screen No Sill Nose I �Gull Gray
Non-Stndrd � I i Pine
Cobnial i i Designer Sash
7/B" j I �Clear Int.
I Colnl Profile
li I
2W 2H �No Hardwere No Brickmould � 6 11118" Cled:7 —
Equal No Screen No Sill Nose i Gull Gray
Non-StndM � i I i Pine
Cobnial j ,Designer Sash
7/8" � � 'Clear Int.
' —�I �Colnl Profile
il i
------ �------ F-- �--- --- --___
2W 2H ;Bronze j No Brickmould j 6 11/16" �Clad 7
Equal '-Hardware I No Sill Nose I j Guli Gray
Non-Stndrd �Bronze 'I � I Pine
Cobnial -Screen � �Designer Sash
7/8" I ;Clear Int
-------- i Coinl Profile
1�� ------_ -----
-- r
I -- ; ----
2W 2H Bronze i No Bnckmould i 6 11l16" I Clad:7
Equal I-Hardware I No Sill Nose �Gull Gray
Non-Sfidrd 'Bronze I j Pine
Colonial -Screen I I f Designer Sash
7/8" i Clear Int.
�I � �Colnl Profile
Itm 'I flty Product Code
17 1 C-AC-366&2
IAspen Casement
I U-tactor:0.30
SHGC:0.16
1 C-AC-3036-2
Aspen Casement
�U-feCtor:0.30
� SHGC:0.16
18 1 C-AC-3072-2
, Aspen Casement
U-factor:0.30
SHGC:0.16
1 GAG3036-2
�Asnen Casement
Rough Opening
Width x Height
(lnchesl
723/4x663/4
60 3/4 x 38 3/4
60 3/4 x 72 3/4
60 3/4 x 36 3/4
�U-factor 0.30
--------- I.___ --.._ ....---
SHGC:0 16 j
1�C-AC-3072-2 I 60 3/4 x 72 3/4
Aspen Casement ',
IU-tactor:0.30 I!
SHGC:0.16 ,
1'C-ACP-5072-1 � 50 3/4 x 72 3/4
�Aspen Casement Picture i
�u-r�aor:oze
SHGC:0.22
1 GACP-5072-7
Aspen Casement Pidure
U-fector:0.28
SHGC:0.22
1 GACP-5072-1
Aspen Casement Picture
u-r�aor:o.za
SHGC:0.22
Order Number 90303690 Page 4 of 10 Initials:
�ite or ' Jam !
Oper Sym ! Loutlon � G�� ' Grille ! Hardwere ' Ezterfor S�� AddiUonal I
� Options Pattem Trim I (i��sl Options �I
;
—--- ---- -------+---___--- -_..�_- -----__
1 _---- ------ ------ - - _ _____,
�-±
; ;OPEN TO BELOW ',Insulated 2W 3H !Bronze �No Brickmould I 6 11/16" Clad:7 I
',Vent Tubes 'Equal -Hardware '!No Sill Nose i Gull Gray I
i �ISIM DL ��Non-Stndrd �Bronze � '� Pine
i ILoE'-388 �Colonial i-Screen ; I Desiqner Sash
i ITemp Int �7/8" Clear Int. I
I iLoE-i81 I Colnl Profile I
-, Vent Tubes I--- I �------ -- --____ .1
� Equal No Screen No Brickmould I 8 11/16" Clad 7
+— -t- -----
> �GREAT ROOM �Insulated �,2W 2H No Hardware !
' ' No Sill Nose i Gull Gray 'i
' �SIM DL ;Non-Stndrd ' Pine
I, ILoE'-366 �Colonial ; ! Designer Sash I,
! �ITemp Int ��7/8" ! i Clear Int. �
ILoE-i81 ' I Col�l Profile
iGREATROOM �Insulated
Vent Tubes
�SIM DL
; �LoE'-366
i �Temp Int
'LoE-i81
+---- --+-----
IGREATROOM Insulated
ilVent Tubes
SIM DL
!LoE'-366
� ',Temp I�t
----- ILoE�81
r --------_ _ .___._.._
�GREAT ROOM Insulated
�I ;VeM Tubes
'SIM DL
�', IILoE'-366
i ITemp Int
LoE-i81
---t------
IGREATROOM ilnsulated
IVent Tubes
i, �,LoE'-386
Itemp I�t
��LoE-i81
50 3!4 x 72 3/4 'S IGREAT ROOM Ilnsulated
I Vent Tubes
i ,�LoE'-368
i jTemp Int
i LoE-i81
50 3/4 x 72 3/4 S !GREAT RM TEMP !Insulated
i ;Tempered
i ;Vent Tubes
! �LoE'-366
LoE-i81
2W 4H 'Bronze 'No Bridcmould i 6 11/16" Clad:7
�,Equal �-Hardware ',No Sill Nose ; Gull Gray
I Non-Stndrd 'Bronze Pine
i Cobnial i-Screen Designer Sash !
',7/8" , � Clear Int.
� CoIM Profile
i —�
r -- ------�----- -------
'2W 2H 'No Hardware ;No Brickmouid ! 6 11/i6" Clad:7
�Equal !No Screen !No Sill Nose � Guli Gray I
�NonStndrd , Pine I
i Cobnial i � Designer Sash lil
'��7/8" i I Clear Int. �
Colnl Profile I
i ----- _ _ . -- -- --- ----. _
2W 4H Bronze rNo Bnckmou�d 6 11/16" Clad.7 �
i Equal I-Hardware No Siil Nose Gull Gray �
'Non-StndM Bronze I Pine �'I
'Cobnial -Screen 'i ' (Desig�er Sash i
���7/8" � Clear int. !
i I Colni Profile �I
I -�-- I ----�--- ------ I
�i 1 lite '�No Hardware I No Brickmould i 6 11/16" Clad:7 '
� I,No Screen '�No Sill Nose � Gull Gray
i ' I Pine '�
Designer Sash '
� � Clearint. '
�I I il i
Colnl Profile
i
- -- -----�
;1 Lite No Hardware i No Bridcmould I 6 11/16" Clad:7 i
No Screen i No Sill Nose �, Gull Gray
! Pine
� , ', Designer Sash i
� i ' Clearint. I
i I I i Colnl Proflle
F-- --- ------- -�
',1 Lite No Hardware �No Brickmould � 6 11H6" Clad:7
I I No Screen �I No Sill Nose -�—-- Gull Gray
, � Pine
i� � I , Designer Sash ,
IClear Int.
� i I i Colnl Profile '�
Rough Opening j
IGn !Glty Product Code ! W�� x Height Oper Sym
- , (Inchesl
--�-- -- ----- �----
_---- ----- --..
25� 1�C-AG3036-2 I 60 3/4 x 36 3/4 SS
li Aspen Casement �
U-factor.0.30 I
� SHGC:0.16
---�-- - —
26 1 C-AC-3036-2 �I 60 3/4 x 38 3/4 SS
Asoen Casement
I U-fador.0.30 �
SHGC:0.16
1 GAC-3036-2 �' 60 3/4 x 36 3/4
i Aspen Casement !
i
i
� U-fador.0.30
! SHGC:0.16
I 1�GI D-3696-1 38 7H 6 x 88 1/2
Inswinp Door ,
� �U-factor:0.30 ��
SHGC:0.16 I
291 1 C-AC-3030-3 ', 90 3/4 x 96 3/4
ii Aspen Casement '
Mulled Unit I�
I •'First item in unit ;
' il
U-factor:0.30 ,
SHGC:0.16 '
30!, C A1 C 3066-3 I' ->See item#29
iAspen Casement Ili
I ->See item#29
li Ij
, U-fador.0.30 !
Y_ SHGC:O_16-- --1----------_....
� �
31; 1 IC ACP-37 11/1630-1 ', 38 7/16 x 128 1/2
i Aspe�Casement P�cture''�
;
; Mulled Unit �I
; "'Pirst Rem in unit
� U-fedor.0.26 �
� I SHGC:0.20 I
Location
GREAT ROOM
GREAT ROOM
'I GREAT ROOM
�i
GREAT ROOM
Order Number 90303690 Page 5 of 10 Initials:
-------� Lke or � Jam � ---
Glaze I Grilk Hardware I Exterior ' S�� Additional I
Options Pattem � Trim �i (inches) Optlons i
---_ _ , ----_ _., ----- ____-----�-- --- __------
Insulated I 2W 2H No Hardware No Brickmould 6 11H6" Clad.7 !
Vent Tubes I Equal �No Scree� ;No Sili Nose ' Guil Grey
SIM DL !I Non-StndM � � i Pine i
LoE'-366 Colonial i I Designer Sash �
Temp Int ��7!8" i Clear Int !
LoE-i81 I i I I Colnl Profile
,
, , ; i
�
----------�------i------�-------� ;
Insulated �i 2W 2H �!�No Hardware ;No Brickmould � 6 11/16" Clad:7 ,
Vent Tubes �,Equal ,No Screen ;No Si�l Nose � Gull Gray
SIM DL Non-5tndrd j ! �i Pine
LoE'-366 !Coloniai � � I Designer Sash �
Temp Int I 7/8" � I Clear Int.
LoE-i81 ' � i Colnl Profile
I , i
Insulated 2W 2H �No Hardware :No Brickrtauld ', 6 11/16" Clad:7 '
Vent Tubes !Equal 'No Screen 'No Sill Nose � Gull Gray �
SIM DL ,Non-Stndrd � j Pine
LoE'-366 �,Cobniai , i I Designer Sash
Temp Int 'i 7/8" i I Clear Int. �
LoE-i81 ' Colnl Profile
Insulated ��1 Lite 'i MuncheN374 !No Brickmould � 6 11/16" Clad:7
Tempered �, I Brass ; I Gull Grey �.
Vent Tubes I Trim Set ; I Douy Fir i
LoE'-366 I 8rass I � Clear Int. �.
LoE-i61 i i�-Hinges ! i
Head:4 5/8 il grown-Qlon �
Stile:4 5/8 I i
Kick:613/16 i �
DINING ROOM Ilnsulated I 2W 2H No Hardware i No Brickmouid 6 11/16" I Clad:7
�Vent Tubes �Equal I�No Screen 'No Sill Nose I Gull Gray
'iSIM DL '�NonStndrd �' I Pine
',LoE'-366 !Cobnial I ; �Designer Sash
ITemp Int �7/8" i i i Clear Int.
ILoE-i81 I � ;Co1N Profile
IDINING ROOM
II
!IMASTER
i'
Insulated
,Vent Tubes
SIM DL
LoE'-366
1Temp Int
j LoE-i81
IInsulated
Vent Tubes
�SIM DL
�',LoE'-366
�,Temp Int
I LoE-i81
;2W 3H I Bronze �No Brickmouid � 6 11l16" �Cled:7 ;
;Equal '-Hardware I No Sill Nose �i Gull Grey '
Non-Stndrd Bronze I Pine
:Colonial :-Screen ; ' !Designer Sash
7/8" i j Clear Int !
i, I �Colnl Profile ;
E ual No Screen � � �
--- —, No SiII Nose
q + No Bnckmould ,; 6 11/16' ,Clad.7
2W 2H �i No Hardware I Gull Grey
,Non-Stndrd !I Pine �
;Colonia� II I ' Designer Sash I
I 7/8" I Clear Int.
, �i ; �Colnl Profile I�
Itm i Qty Product Code
—'r-- --—
32� 1 C-IS-36961
' �Inswing Door Sidelfte
� ->See item#31
; U-factor:0.33
I I SHGC:0.11
1 I C-AG3630-2
Aspen Casement
i (U-fador:0.30
' SHGC:0.16
I I
-----+—-- ----
1 GACP-7266-1
Aspen Casement Picture
I U-factor.0.26
� SHGC:0.22
�� 7 C-ACP-3711/1830-1
Aspen Casement Picture
Mulled Unit
j ••First Rem in unit
I
U-fador:0.28
SHCaC:020
� — ---__ _.___.. --
' 1 C-ID-3696-1
�Inswing Door
i
->See item#35
I
� U-factor:0.30
� SHGC:0.14
1 I GAC-30542
iAspen Casement
'U-fador.0.30
SHGC:0.16
1 C-AG24241-
Aspen Casement
U-factor:0.30
SHGC:0.16
Rough Opening
'i Width x Helght Oper Sym
(Inchesl
_- ---- —._._- -_.....
I ->See item#31 O
723/4x303/4
72314x663/4
Order Number 90303690
i I i Lite or - --
' Locatfon ' G�� ' Grille Hardware
Options , Pattem i
t----MASTER _ r__-- , _- _---�------
------ '
I �ilnsulated ;2W 4H �Brown-�bn
'� iTempered ;Equal
VentTubes Non-Stndrd i
i I�SIM DL 'Colonial ;
LoE'-366 i 7/B"
�LoE-i81
i,Head:4 5/8 i
'i Stile:4 5/8 i
Kick:613/16 i
, i I
Page 6 of 10 Initials:
Exterior S�� I AddRional
(inches) OpUons
------- � - ....___
Trim �i
No Brickmould ' 6 11/16" Clad:7
', 'Gull Gray
i Doug Fir
Clear Int.
MASTER 'insulated 2W 2H �No Hardware No Brickmould 6 11/16" 'Clad:7 '
, Vent Tubes 'i Equal �,No 5creen �No Sill Nose � Gull Gray
` �SIM DL ��Non-Stndrd I � � Pine
� ;LoE'-366 ,Coloniai �I �Designer Sash
'Temp Int '�7/S" i I I Clear Int.
�LoE-i61 , i Colnl Profile
i �
--- -- ----- - -- ' i
;MASTER ilnsulated '1 Lke I No Hardware 'No Brickmould �� 6 11/16"Glad:7
iTempered ��i I No Screen !No Sill Nose Gull Gray
�Vent Tubes ' i Pine '
� iLoE'-366 � , Designer Sash j
� jLoE-i81 ', � i Clear Int. !
38 7/16 x 128 1/2 S �i MASTER '•,Insulated �2W 2H �No Hardware �No Bridcmould�', 6 11/16" C�d 7rofile -i
�, ',Vent Tubes I Equal ��No Screen ��No Sill Nose �, 'Gull Gray I
I iSIM DL �i Non-Stndrd I �Pine I
'I �LoE'-368 I Cobnial I � (Designer Sash
'�Temp Int I 7/8" � i Clear Int. II
',LoE-i81 I , I !Colnl Profile
->See item#35 L
i
60 3/4 x 54 3/4 I LR
24 3/4 x 24 3/4
IMASTER
I
MASTER TUB
MASTER BA TEMP
_ _' --------� I
----- - - i_ ---- - -- —--
Insulated 2W 4H Munchen/374 �No Brickmould �i 6 11H6" Clad:7
Tempered I Equal !OR Brass Gull Grey
Vent Tubes Non-Stndrd I-Trim Set ! �I Doug Fir
SIM DL Cobnial '�OR Brass i ' I Clear Int.
LoE'-366 '7/8" �-Hinges
LoE-i81 �Brown-Qbn ' �
Head:4 5/8 j I i
Stile:4 5/8 I i
Kidc:613/16 I � I I
ated �2W 3H Bronze I No Brickmould j 8 11/16" �Clad:7
pered 'Equal -Hardware �'No Sill Nose Gull Grey
Tubes ',Non-StndM 'Bronze � Pine
DL 'Cobnial -Screen �Designer Sash
-366 7/8" ' ' I Ciearint.
i81 � II �i �Colnl Profile
�
_______-_____,___________'._.___ _....__.___---_�-__.__.__.__-_____L
..�_._ . __ _ __._____._..__
ated 2W 2H I No Hardware i No Brickmould ; 6 11/16" Clad:7
pered Equal i No Screen I No Sill Nose Gull Grey
Tubes 'Non-Stndrd � ! ' Pine
DL li Colonial ' � ! Designer Sash
-366 i 7/8" ! �, I i Clear Int.
i81 I 'i I i �Colnl Profile
. i
�
I�I I �Rough Opening T i
Itm �Qty Product Code W�� x Height Oper Sym I Locatioo
� Ilncheal _'i
- --- �-- ---------___-
39 1 GAG24241 � 24 3/4 x 24 3/4 S ��i MASTER BATH
Aspen Casement � �
IU-hactor:0.30 I II
SHGC:0.16 I�
— -- ----------i---- -t----------
40I 1 GAG24241 24 3/4 x 24 3/4 L i MASTER TOILET
i IAspen Casement , i
� I i �I
II U-tador.0.30 'i
SHGC:0.16 �I
; I
4T 1 C-AG3042-2 j 60 3/4 x 42 3/4 LR �MASTER LANDING
i Aspen Casement
i '
!I I U-factor:0.30 I
, SHGC:0.16
---�--�-------- —
42I 1 I Boxed Window I
I Hardware-HOLD
i i
� 43� 1,Builder Lock&Slide �
Order Number 90303690 Page 7 of 10 Initials:
Lite or ' i j---
Jam
Glaze I Grille � Hardware Exterior Si� AddRlonal �
Trim � Optlons �
i Onchea)
+------ �---- ------_ }__ ---- — ---i--
Options p�ef� i
ated 2W 2H 'No Hardware ±No Brickmould 6 11/16" j Clad:7
Tubes I Equal ;No Screen I No Sill Nose ' Guli Gray �
DL 'Non-Stndrd I I Pine �I
-366 �i Cobnial ' � Designer Sash
p int I 7/8" � I; �i Clear Int. II
i81 I II � Colnl Profile 'i
I �
- t- -�- raY
----- --
ated 2W 2H Bronze No Brickmould i 6 11/16" Clad:7
�Equai , Hardware No Sill Nose ! i Gull G
�— -- --------
Tubes I
DL I!Non-Stndrd Bronze '� I Pina
-366 ��Cobnial '-Screen I � Designer Sash I
p Int 7/B" I �� �i Clear Int.
i81 I �, Colnl Profile '
---;-----� __— -��-- -..._--{—
ated �2W 2H I Bronze �,No Brickmould ': 6 11/18 I Clad:7
pered �I Equal '-Hardware I No Sill Nose ; Gull Gray I��
Tubes �Non-Stndrd Bronze ' I Pine '
DL I Cobnial j-Screen �� �I Designer Sash ;
-366 I 7/8" '� � � Clear Int. �
i81 , I � I Colnl Profile I
i
� .��.��... _�._�.� ��,., ,��,�.�_ .,.._„_� _ _ � �
� �'�� = �` � � � ��; ���.� Department of Community Developmen�'��
a.. ` _� �� T� �. � � � �` 75 South Frontage Road
�. �� ��� ����•� �,#�� � ��, . �,,� , . �`�,yx>� : ' � Vail,�aJorado 81657 �
• .,��, ''� ..��,.��� � :� Te(: 970-479-2128 �
'� �. ' f`�� � � � � � Web: www.vailgov:com
� �� k Developinent Review Coordinator a
�.
#' � ' . ��,-
. - -
... ... �i
4 y<,A.
{7 f . . �
.t�
j� �'. � n. � �
:`
.,
���{��!}�, ' '. _ `_�.._.�� ��`�` �„_ $�
,M
� .� � .w ; � � _ ,
f . _y.... 0 4 tr . .^.Fg, � .
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
(Separate applications are required for alarm &sprinkler) v �'�
Pro'e�e A� ddress: \ �'� Project#: P�,JI�—��e�a,(p
-����1Z�.d-;� �
oRg#: Rbl l o�39
(Number) (Street) �� (Suite#) _ ,
(n}I� Building Permit#: �
Building/Complex Name: Jr,��
Lot#:�Block#� Subdivisio '
�
Contractor Inf ation �
Business Name: �� `�,Y�T_�, Work Class: New� ) Addition ( ) Alteration ( )
Business Address: �Type of Building:
City State: Zip: ��� Single-Family( ) Duplex�) Multi-Family( )
` Commercial ( ) Other( )
Contact Name:
Contact Phone: ' �V 3 Work Type: Interior( ) Exterior( ) Both�)
Contact E-Mail: , ��0.• Valuation of
Work Included Plans Included Work
Contractor Registration Number:
Electrical ( )Yes ( )No ( )Yes ( )No ��-
X [ o o Mechanical ( )Yes ( )No ( )Yes ( )No '��
Owner/Owner's Representative Signature(Required) Plumbing ( )Yes ( )No ( )Yes ( )No ���
Project Informajion�n������� � Building ( )Yes ( )No ( )Yes ( )No
Owner Name: lII`
/�1 �('�(�' Value of all work being performed: y y�y (�
Parcel#:211�1"U���1 LJL.I l (value based on IBC Section 109.3&IRC Section 108.9)� ° `�
(For Parcel#,contact Eagle County Assessors Office at 0-328-8640 or visit � O f V7
www.eaglecounty.us/patie) Electrical Square Footage �
Detailed Scope and Location of Work: � C,
���X�� � �0�9.�•
(use additional sheet if necessary)
For Office Use Only: Date Received: � � � 0 �n �
D `�'
Fee Paid: 3D9S.g �
Received From: Sev�rr Ti12u�p5E� �}tA
Cash Check # 5 S D 1 MAY 19 2011
CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # exp date:
Auth # TQVVN O�VAtL
O1-Jan-li
!
� Indoor Environmental Services, Inc
Dba: Q Consulting, Inc.
Project: 616 Forest Rd, Vail, Colorado
Asbestos Inspection Report
April 29, 2011
Wally
Scott S. Turnipseed Architects
On April 27, 2011, Quentin Danziger conducted an asbestos inspection of the suspect ,
materials throughout the house. Asbestos was found, as described below. j
Homogenous Description Number of %Asbestos Square Type/Friable? I
Area Sam les Feet
O1 Texture 5 2% �5000 Surf/Yes
02 Texture/ 5 2% �5000 Misc/Yes
SheetrocWJC Texture
<1%
Com osite
03 Vinyl Floor 3 Non Detect
Covering in
Lower Bath
04 VCT Floor 3 5% �40 Misc/No
Tile Under
Stairs
OS External Wall 3 Non Detect
Pa er 1
06 External Wall 3 Non Detect
Pa er 2
07 Roof 3 Non Detect
Membrane
NOTE: These samples have not been analyzed using the Point Count method. These
samples have been analyzed by the PLM method, which is faster, less expensive and less
accurate than Point Counting.
According to the State of Colorado, if PLM analysis shows 10%asbestos or less, the
material can be either assumed to be Asbestos Containing Material (ACM), or the
material can be analyzed by the Point Count method for verification above or less than
1%asbestos.
Indoor Environmental Services, Inc
Dba: Q Consulting, Inc.
Project: 616 Forest Rd, Vail, Colorado
Asbestos Inspection Report
If the Point Count result is greater than or equal to 1%asbestos, then the State of
Colorado, OSHA and EPA all DO consider the material to be an ACM. If the Point
Count result is less than 1%asbestos,the State of Colorado does NOT consider this to be
an ACM. HOWEVER, OSHA and EPA DO consider the material to be an ACM no
matter how small the percentage. No matter what the Point Count result, OSHA and
EPA Federal Regulations DO require a complete asbestos abatement if the material is to
be disturbed.
CONCLUSIONS: I
2% asbestos was found in the texture. 5% asbestos was found in the floor tile under
the stairs. These samples have not been analyzed using the point count method,
described above. Unless Point Counting is done, this material is assumed to be an
Asbestos Containing Material by the State of Colorado, OSHA and EPA.
Less than 1% asbestos was found in the joint compound /sheetrock, when measured
as a composite material. This is meaningless unless the texture is found to be less than
1%asbestos, in which case the State of Colorado will not care, but OSHA and EPA still
DO require a complete asbestos abatement.
Indoor Environmental Services recommends that material containing any amount
of asbestos be disturbed and disposed of only by a professional asbestos abatement
contractor.
NOTE:Neither I nor Indoor Environmental Services get anything from recommending
these contractors. I recommend them because they have a reputation for being responsive
and doing a good job.
Rocky Mountain Abatement - Richard Capra- 303-619-8023 - Cell
Equinox Environmental -Jerry Spainhower- 303-941-4778—Cell
Stink, Inc—Bob Hamilton—303-886-4719—Cell
BACKGROUND:
Complete demolition is planned for this house. Indoor Environmental Services was
requested to conduct an asbestos inspection of the suspect materials throughout.
Indoor Environmental Services, Inc
Dba: Q Consulting, Inc. ;
Project: 616 Forest Rd, Vail, Colorado
Asbestos Inspection Report
This inspection includes only suspect materials that are visible to the inspector. If other
suspect materials become visible during demolition, they must be sampled before they
are disturbed. Examples of suspect materials include but are not limited to: linoleum,
floor tile, ceiling tile, mastic, sheetrock,joint compound, roofing materials, etc. There are
over 3000 known asbestos containing materials.
SAMPLING PLAN: '
Colorado State Requirements - For each homogenous area of less than 1000 square
feet, a minimum of three samples must be collected in random areas. For each
homogenous area of 1000—5000 square feet, a minimum of five samples must be
collected in random areas. Areas of 5001 square feet or greater require a minimum of 7
samples. These laws are defined by the EPA (AHERA) and Colorado State Regulation 8.
Determination of homogenous sampling areas—Homogenous Areas are determined by
type of suspect material, texture, color and location.
Determination of random sampling areas—The samples were collected in a random
manner.
Thank you for using Q Consulting, Inc. We are proud to be your local indoor air quality
consultants. We look forward to working with you in the future.
Quentin Danziger, BS, CIE, ABI —Colorado Asbestos Inspector Certification# 12781
Indoor Environmental Services, Inc.
Dba Q Consulting, Inc.
970-390-0087
QConsultingInc@yahoo.com
I
I
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
7330 S.Alton Way Building 12 Suite A, Centennial, CO 80112 '
Phone: (303)740-5700 Fax: (303)741-1400 Email: denverlab@emsl.com
An�: quentin Danzi er
g Customer ID: INES78
Q Consulting, Inc. CustomerPO:
PO Box 997 Received: 04/28/11 9:05 AM
Vail, CO 81658 EMSL Order: 221101220
Fax: Phone: (970)390-0087 EMSL Proj:
Project: 616 Forest Rd-Vail
Analysis Date: 4/28/2011
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using �
Polarized Light Microscopy '
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type
01-01 Texture White 100% Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile
zz�totzzo-0oot Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
01-02 Texture Whfte 100% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
22t�ot2zo-0oo2 Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Paint only
01-03 Texture White 100°/a Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
22��0�22o-0oos Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Paint only
01-04 Texture White 100% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
22>>0�22o-0ooa Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
01-05 Texture White 100% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
22�to�22o-000s Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Paint only
02-01-Texture Texture/JC/Sheetro White 98% Non-fibrous(other) 2% Chrysotile
zz>>oizzo-000e �k Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Initial report from 04/28/2011 17:33:44
Anayst(s)
Erin Orthun(46) Erin Orthun,Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced,except in full,without written approval by EMSL. EMSL
bears no responsibility for sample collection actiHties or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibiliry of the client. This 2port must not be
used by the client to claim product certification,approval,or endorsement by NVLAP,NIST or any agency of the federal govemment. Non-friable organically bound materials present a
problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical,Inc.Centennial,CO NVLAP Lab Code 200828-0
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed:4/28/2011 5:33:44 PM �
• i
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
7330 S.Alton Way Building 12 Suite A, Centennial, CO 80112
Phone: (303)740-5700 Fax: (303)741-1400 Email: denverlab@emsl.com
An": Quentin Danziger c�stome�i�: wES�s
Q Consulting, II1C. Customer PO:
PO Box 997 Received: 04/28/11 9:05 AM
Vail, CO 81658 EMSL Order: 221101220
Fax: Phone: (970)390-0087 EMSL Proj:
Project: 616 Forest Rd-Vail
Analysis Date: 4/28/2011
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy ��
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type
02-01-Joint TeMure/JC/SheeVo White 98% Non-fibrous(other) 2% Chrysotile
Compound ck Non-Fibrous
221 f 01220-0OO6A
Homogeneous
02-01-Drywall Texture/JC/SheeVo Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
zzttotzzo-000se �k Fibrous
Heterogeneous
02-01-Composite Texture/JC/SheeVo Brown/White 10°/a Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile
22ttot22o-0ooeC �k Fibrous
Heterogeneous
02-02-Texture Te�Rure/JC/Sheetro White 100°/a Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile
zz��o�zzo-000� �k Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
02-02-Joint Te�ure/JC/SheeVo White 100% Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile
Compound ck Non-Fibrous
221101220-0007A
Homogeneous
02-02-Drywall Texture/JC/Sheetro Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90°/a Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
22ttot22o-0oo�e �k Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Initial report from 04/28/2011 17:33:44
Analyst(s)
Erin Orthun(46) Erin Orthun,Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced,except in full,without written appro�el by EMSL. EMSL
bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of tesl results are the responsibiliry of the clienl This report must not be
used by the client to claim product certification,approval,or endorsement by NVLAP,NIST or any agency of the federal govemment. Non-friable organically bound materials present a
problem matrixand therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical,Inc.Centennial,CO NVLAP Lab Code 200828-0
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed:4/28/2011 533:44 PM Z
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
7330 S.Alton Way Building 12 Suite A, Centennial, CO 80112
Phone: (303)740-5700 Fax: (303)741-1400 Email: denverlaba�emsl.com
A"": Quentin Danzi er
g Customer ID: INES78
Q Consulting, II1C. Customer PO:
PO Box 997 Received: 04/28/11 9:05 AM
Vail, CO 81658 EMSL Order: 221101220
Fax: Phone: (970)390-0087 EMSL Proj:
Project: 616 Forest Rd-Vail Analysis Date: 4/28/2011
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
Sample Description Appearance °/, Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type I
02-02-Composite Te�ure/JC/SheeVo Brown/White 10°/a Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous(other) <7°/, Chrysotile
22tton2o-0oo�C �k Fibrous
Heterogeneous
02-03-Texture Tezture/JC/SheeVo White 100% Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile
z2��o�2zo-0oos �k Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
02-03-Joint Texture/JC/SheeVo White 100°/a Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile
Compound ck Non-Fibrous
221101220-0008A
Homogeneous
02-03-Drywall Texture/JC/SheeVo Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
22�tot22o-000ae �k Fibrous
Heterogeneous
02-03-Composite Texture/JC/Sheetro Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile
22ttot22o-0ooaC �k Fibrous
Heterogeneous
02-04-Texture Texture/JC/SheeVo White 100% Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile
22��o�zzo-0oo9 �k Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Initial report from 04/28/2011 17:33:44
Anayst(s)
Erin Orthun(46) Erin Orthun,Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced,except in full,without written approval by EMSL. EMSL
bears no responsibiliry for sample collection actiNties or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibiliry of the client. This report must not be
used by the client to claim product certification,approval,or endorsement by NVLAP,NIST or any agency of the federal govemment. Non-friable organically bound materials present a
problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples anal zed by EMSL Analytical,Inc.Centennial,CO NVLAP Lab Code 200828-0
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed:4/28/2011 5:33:44 PM 3
� I
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
7330 S.Alton Way Building 12 Suite A, Centennial, CO 80112
Phone: (303)740-5700 Fax: �303)741-1400 Email: denverlab(a)emsi.com
An": quentin Danzi er
g Customer ID: INES78
Q Consulting, If1C. Customer PO:
PO Box 997 Received: 04/28/11 9:05 AM
Vail, CO 81658 EMSL Order: 221101220
Fax: Phone: (970)390-0087 EMSL Proj:
Project: 616 Forest Rd-Vail Analysis Date: 4/28/2011
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type
02-04-Joint Texture/JGSheeVo WhRe 100% Non-fibrous(other) <7% Chrysotile I
Compound ck Non-Fibrous �I
221f01220-0009A �'�,
Homogeneous I
02-04-Drywall Texture/JC/SheeVo Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90°/a Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
22ttot22o-0oose �k Fibrous
Heterogeneous
02-04-Composite Te�Rure/JC/Sheetro Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90°/a Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile
zz�toizzo-000sC �k Fibrous
Heterogeneous
02-05-Texture Texture/JC/SheeVo White 100% Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile
22i�oi22o-ooto �k Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
02-05-Joint Te�ure/JC/Sheetro White 100% Non-fibrous(other) <1% Chrysotile
Compound ck Non-Fibrous
221 f 01220-0O10A
Homogeneous
02-05-Drywall Texture/JC/Sheetro Brown/White 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
n��ot22o-0otoe �k Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Initial repoR from 04/28/2011 1733:44
Analyst(s) � � �
Erin Orthun(46) Erin Orthun,Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced,except in full,without written appmval by EMSL. EMSL
bears no responsibiliTy for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be
used by the client to claim product certification,approval,or endorsement by NVLAP,NIST or any agency of the federal govemment. Non-friable organically bound materials present a
problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless othenvise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical,Inc.Centennial,CO NVLAP Lab Code 200828-0
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed:4/28/2011 533:44 PM 4
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
7330 S.Alton Way Building 12 Suite A, Centennial, CO 80112
Phone: (303)740-5700 Fax: (303)741-1400 Email: denverlab(a�emsl.com
Att": Quentin Danziger Customer ID: INES78
Q Consulting, I11C. Customer PO:
PO Box 997 Received: 04/28/11 9:05 AM
Vail, CO 81658 EMSL Order: 221101220
Fax: Phone: (970)390-0087 EMSL Proj:
Project: 616 Forest Rd-Vail Analysis Date: 4/28/2011
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
Non-Asbestos Asbestos �
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type
02-05-Composite Texture/JC/Sheetro Brown/White 10°/a Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous(other) <7% Chrysotile
2zttotzzo-ootoC �k Fibrous
Heterogeneous
03-01-Linoleum Lower Bath Tan 20% Cellulose 70°/a Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
zzi�oizzo-oo�i Linoleum Fibrous 10% Glass
Heterogeneous
03-01-Mastic Lower Bath Tan 100°/a Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
zz>>o�zzo-oo�ia Linoleum Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
03-02-Linoleum Lower Bath Tan 20% Cellulose 70% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
22��0�220-00�2 Linoleum Fibrous 10% Glass
Heterogeneous
03-02-Mastic Lower Bath Tan 100% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
zz��o�zzo-ooiza Linoleum Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
03-03-Linoleum Lower Bath Tan 20% Cellulose 70% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
22i�oi22o-0o�s Linoleum Fibrous 10% Glass
Heterogeneous
03-03-Mastic Lower Bath Tan 100% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
221 f01220-0013A Linoleum Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Initial report from 04/28/2011 17:33:44
Anayst(s)
Enn Orthun(46) Erin Orthun,Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced,except in full,without written appmval by EMSL. EMSL
bears no responsibiliry for sample collection actiHties or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. lhis report must not be
used by the client to claim product certifcation,approval,or endorsement by NVLAP,NIST or any agency of the federal govemment. Non-friable organically bound materials present a
problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical,Inc.Centennial,CO NVLAP Lab Code 200828-0
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed:4/28/2011 5:33:44 PM 5
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
7330 S.Alton Way Building 12 Suite A, Centennial, CO 80112
Phone: (303)740-5700 Fax: (303)741-1400 Email: denverlabla�emsl.com
Att�: Quentin Danzi er
g Customer ID: INES78
Q C011SUltillg, II1C. Customer PO:
PO Box 997 Received: 04/28/11 9:05 AM
Vail, CO 81658 EMSL Order: 221101220 I
Fax: Phone: (970)390-0087 II
EMSL Proj:
Project: 616 Forest Rd-Vail I
Analysis Date: 4/28/2011
III
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using '�,
Polarized Light Microscopy �i
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
Sample Description Appearance °/, Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type
04-01-Floor Tile Under Stairs Floor Tan 95°/a Non-fibrous(other) 5% Chrysotile
zzvo�zzo-oo�a Tile Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
04-01-Mastic Under Stairs Floor Black 100% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
221f01220-0014A Tile Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
04-02-Floor Tile Under Stairs Floor Tan 95°/a Non-fibrous(other) 5% Chrysotile
zz>>o�zzo-0o�s Tile Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
04-02-Mastic Under Stairs Floor Black 100% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
221f01220-0015A Tile Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
04-03-Floor Tile Under Stairs Floor Tan 95°/a Non-fibrous(other) 5% Chrysotile
22>>0�22o-0o�s Tile Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
04-03-Mastic Under Stairs Floor Black 100% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
221101220-0016A Tile Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
05-01 Exterior Wall Black/Blue/Gold 5% Glass 95°/a Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
22»0�220-00» Paper 1 Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Initial report from 04/28/2011 17:33:44
Anayst(s)
Erin Orthun(46) Erin Orthun,Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced,eucept in full,without written appro�al by EMSI. EMSL
bears no responsibility for sample collection actiHties or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This 2part must not be
used by the client to claim product certifcation,approval,or endorsement by NVLAP,NIST or any agency of the federal govemment. Non-friable organically bound materials present a
problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric redudion prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical,Inc.Centennial,CO NVLAP Lab Code 200828-0
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed:4/28/2011 5:33:44 PM 6
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
7330 S. Alton Way Building 12 Suite A, Centennial, CO 80112
Phone: (303)740-5700 Fax: (303)741-1400 Email: denverlab@emsl.com
Att": Quentin Danzi er
g Customer ID: INES78
Q Consulting, If1C. Customer PO:
PO Box 997 Received: 04/28/11 9:05 AM
Vail, CO 81658 EMSL Order: 221101220
Fax: Phone: (970)390-0087
EMSL Proj:
Project: 616 Forest Rd-Vail
Analysis Date: 4/28/2011
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type
05-02 Exterior Wall Black/Blue/Gold 5% Glass 95% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
22�io�zzo-oo�s Paper 1 Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
05-03 Exterior Wall Black/Blue/Gold 5% Glass 95% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
z2>>o�z2o-0o�s Paper 1 Fibrous
Heterogeneous
06-01 Exterior Wall Tan/Black 65°/a Cellulose 35% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
zz>>o�220-002o Paper 2 Fibrous
Heterogeneous
06-02 Exterior Wall Tan/Black 65% Cellulose 35°/a Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
zz>>o�zzo-0oz� Paper 2 Fibrous
Heterogeneous
06-03 Exterior Wall Tan/Black 65% Cellulose 35°/a Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
22�ioiz2o-ooz2 Paper2 Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
07-01 Roof Black 10% Synthetic 90% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
22iio�22o-oo2s Fibrous
Heterogeneous
07-02 Roof Black 100% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
22tton2o-ooza Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Initial report from 04/28/2011 17:33:44
Analyst(s) �
Erin Orthun(46) Erin Orthun,Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced,except in full,without written appro�al by EMSL. EMSL
bears no responsibility for sample collection actidties or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be
used by the client to claim product certification,approval,or endorsement by NVLAP,NIST or any agency of the federal govemment. Non-friable organically bound materials present a
problem matnx and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetnc reduction pnor to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical,Inc.Centennial,CO NVLAP Lab Code 200828-0
Test Repat PLM-7.23.0 Printed:4/28/2011 533:44 PM �
h '
^ I
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
7330 S.Alton Way Building 12 Suite A, Centennial, CO 80112
Phone: (303)740-5700 Fax: (303)741-1400 Email: denverlab@emsl.com
Att": Quentin Danzi er
g Customer ID: INES78
Q Consulting, Inc. Customer PO:
PO Box 997 Received: 04/28/11 9:05 AM
Vail, CO 81658 EMSL Order: 221101220
Fax: Phone: (970)390-0087 EMSL Proj:
Project: 616 Forest Rd-Vail Analysis Date: 4/28/2011
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous °/, Type
07-03 Roof Black 10% Synthetic 90% Non-fibrous(other) None Detected
zzt�otz2o-oozs Fibrous
Homogeneous
Initial report from 04/28/2011 17:33:44
Anaryst(s)
Erin Orthun(46) Erin Orthun,Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only lo the samples reported and may not be reproduced,e�ept in full,without written appmvdl by EMSL. EMSL
bears no responsibiliry for sample collection actiHties or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be
used by the client to claim product certification,approual,or endorsement by NVLAP,NIST or any agency of the federal govemment. Non-friable organically bound materials present a
problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless othenvise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical,Inc.Centennial,CO NVLAP Lab Code 200828-0
Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed:4/28/2011 5:33:44 PM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. $
• II
REScheck Software Version 4.4.1
Compliance Certificate
Project Title: Forrest Road Duplex - West
Energy Code: 2009 IECC
Location: Vail,Colorado
Construction Type: Single Family
Building Orientation: Bldg.faces 45 deg.from North
Glazing Area Percentage: 21%
Heating Degree Days: 9248
Climate Zone: 6
Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor:
616 Forest Road Duplex-West Prince Victoria LLLP Scott Turnipseed
Vail,CO 81657 Scott Turnipseed AIA Design&
Construction, Inc.
P.O.Box 3388
Eagle,CO 81631
970328-3900
erica@turnipheadaia.com
. . . . ..- .
Compliance:0.6%Better Than Code Maximum UA:669 Your UA:665
The%Better or Worse Than Code index reflects how close to compliance the house is based on code trade-off rules.
It DOES NOT provide an estimate of energy use or cost relative to a minimum-code home.
•
• • � .
•
Wall 1 -NE:Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 585 21.0 0.0 15
Orientation:Front
Window 1:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 165 0.300 50
SHGC:0.26
Orientation:Front
Door 3:Solid 160 0.430 69
Orientation:Front
Wall 2-E:Wood Frame,16"o.c. 413 21.0 0.0 16
Orientation:Left Side
Window 2:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 135 0.300 41
SHGC:0.26
Orientation:Left Side
Wall 3-S:Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 77 21.0 0.0 4
Orientation:Back
Wall 4-NW:Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 875 21.0 0.0 43
Orientation:Right Side
Window 6:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 93 0.300 28
SHGC:0.26
Orientation:Right Side
Door 4:Solid 24 0.430 10
Orientation:Right Side
Wall 5-SE:Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 569 21.0 0.0 32
Orientation:Back
Wall 6-N:Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 632 21.0 0.0 24
Orientation:Front
Window 4:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 151 0.300 45
SHGC:0.26
Orientation:Front
Door 5:Solid 24 0.430 10
Orientation:Front
Door 6:Solid 28 0.430 12
Project Title: Forrest Road Duplex-West Report date: 05/10/11
Data filename:C:\Users\Megan\DocumentsWctive Energies\Jobs�2007�Forrest Road West crawl.rck Page 1 of 6
Orientation:Front
Wall 7-W:Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 201 21.0 0.0 11
Orientation:Right Side
Wall 8-SW:Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 676 21.0 0.0 21
Orientation:Right Side
Window 5:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 309 0.300 93
SHGC:0.26
Orientation:Right Side
Basement-Full Ht:Solid Concrete or Masonry 232 13.0 0.0 12
Orientation:Right Side
Wall height:9.6'
Depth below grade:9.6'
Insulation depth:9.6'
Basement-Crawl:Solid Concrete or Masonry 212 13.0 0.0 13
Orientation:Back
Wall height:5.0'
Depth below grade:5.0'
Insulation depth:5.0'
Floor-Slab:Slab-On-Grade:Heated 63 10.0 56
Insulation depth: 1.0'
Floor-About Outside:All-Wood Joist/Truss:Over Outside Air 42 49.0 0.0 1
Ceiling 1:Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss 1672 49.0 0.0 43
Crawl 1:Solid Concrete or Masonry 522 0.0 10.0 16
Wall height:5.0'
Depth below grade:5.0'
Insulation depth:5.0'
Inside below-grade depth:0.0'
Compliance Statement: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans,specifications,and other
calculations submitted with the permit application.The proposed building has been designed to meet the 2009 IECC requirements in
REScheck Version 4.4.1 and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the REScheck Inspection Checklist.
Name-Title Signature Date
Project Title: Forrest Road Duplex-West Report date: 05/10/11
Data filename:C:\Users\Megan\DocumentsWctive Energies\Jobs�2007\Forrest Road West crawl.rck Page 2 of 6
REScheck Software Version 4.4.1
Inspection Checklist
Ceilings:
❑ Ceiling 1:Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss,R-49.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
Above-Grade Walls:
❑ Wall 1 -NE:Wood Frame, 16"o.c.,R-21.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
❑ Wall 2-E:Wood Frame,16"o.c.,R-21.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
❑ Wall 3-S:Wood Frame,16"o.c.,R-21.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
❑ Wall 4-NW:Wood Frame, 16"o.c.,R-21.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
❑ Wall 5-SE:Wood Frame, 16"o.c.,R-21.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
❑ Wall 6-N:Wood Frame,16"o.c.,R-21.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
❑ Wall 7-W:Wood Frame, 16"o.c.,R-21.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
❑ Wall 8-SW:Wood Frame, 16"o.c.,R-21.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
Basement Walls:
❑ Basement-Full Ht:Solid Concrete or Masonry,9.6'ht/9.6'bg/9.6'insul,R-13.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
❑ Basement-Crawl:Solid Concrete or Masonry,5.0'ht/5.0'bg/5.0'insul,R-13.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
Windows:
❑ Window 1:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E, U-factor:0.300
For windows without labeled U-factors,describe features:
#Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No
Comments:
❑ Window 2:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E, U-factor:0.300
For windows without labeled U-factors,describe features:
#Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No
Comments:
❑ Window 6:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E,U-factor:0.300
For windows without labeled U-factors,describe features:
#Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No
Comments:
❑ Window 4:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E, U-factor:0.300
For windows without labeled U-factors,describe features:
Project Title: Forrest Road Duplex-West Report date: 05/10/11
Data filename:C:\Users\Megan\Documents�,4ctive Energies\Jobs�2007\Forrest Road West crawl.rck Page 3 of 6
#Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No
Comments:
❑ Window 5:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E, U-factor:0.300
For windows without labeled U-factors,describe features:
#Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No
Comments:
Doors:
❑ Door 3:Solid,U-factor:0.430
Comments:
Up to 40 sq.ft.of this door is exempt from the U-factor requirement.
❑ Door 4:Solid,U-factor:0.430
Comments:
❑ Door 5:Solid,U-factor:0.430
Comments:
❑ Door 6:Solid,U-factor:0.430
Comments:
Floors:
❑ Floor-Slab:Slab-On-Grade:Heated,1.0'insulation depth,R-10.0 continuous insulation
Comments:
Slab insulation extends down from the top of the slab to at least 1.0 ft.OR down to at least the bottom of the slab then horizontally for a
total distance of 1.0 ft.
❑ Floor-About Outside:All-Wood Joist/Truss:Over Outside Air,R-49.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
Floor insulation is installed in permanent contact with the underside of the subfloor decking.
Crawl Space Walls:
❑ Crawl 1:Solid Concrete or Masonry,5.0'ht/5.0'bg/5.0'ext.insul/0.0'inside bg depth,R-10.0 continuous insulation
Comments:
Exposed earth in unvented crawl space foundations is covered with a continuous vapor retarder(less than or equal to 0.1 perm).All joints
of the vapor retarder are overlapped by 6 inches and are sealed or taped with edges extending at least 6 inches up the stem wall and
securely attached.
Air Leakage:
� Joints(including rim joist junctions),attic access openings,penetrations,and all other such openings in the building envelope that are
sources of air leakage are sealed with caulk,gasketed,weatherstripped or otherwise sealed with an air barrier material,suitable film or
solid material.
� Air barrier and sealing exists on common walls between dwelling units,on exterior walls behind tubs/showers,and in openings between
window/doorjambs and framing.
� Recessed lights in the building thermal envelope are 1)type IC rated and ASTM E283 labeled and 2)sealed with a gasket or caulk
between the housing and the interior wall or ceiling covering.
� Access doors separating conditioned from unconditioned space are weather-stripped and insulated(without insulation compression or
damage)to at least the level of insulation on the surrounding surfaces.Where loose fill insulation exists,a baffle or retainer is installed
to maintain insulation application.
� Wood-burning fireplaces have gasketed doors and outdoor combustion air.
Air Sealing and Insulation:
� Building envelope air tightness and insulation installation complies by either 1)a post rough-in blower door test result of less than 7
ACH at 33.5 psf OR 2)the following items have been satisfied:
(a)Air barriers and thermal barrier: Installed on outside of air-permeable insulation and breaks or joints in the air barrier are filled or
repaired.
(b)Ceiling/attic:Air barrier in any dropped ceiling/soffit is substantially aligned with insulation and any gaps are sealed.
(c)Above-grade walls:Insulation is installed in substantial contact and continuous alignment with the building envelope air barrier.
(d)Floors:Air barrier is installed at any exposed edge of insulation.
(e)Plumbing and wiring:Insulation is placed between outside and pipes.Batt insulation is cut to fit around wiring and plumbing,or
sprayed/blown insulation extends behind piping and wiring.
Project Title: Forrest Road Duplex-West Report date: 05/10/11
Data filename:C:\Users\Megan\DocumentsWctive Energies\Jobs�2007\Forrest Road West crawl.rck Page 4 of 6
,
(f) Corners,headers,narrow framing cavities,and rim joists are insulated.
(9)Shower/tub on exterior wall: Insulation exists between showers/tubs and exterior wall.
Sunrooms:
� Sunrooms that are thermally isolated from the building envelope have a maximum fenestration U-factor of 0.50 and the maximum
skylight U-factor of 0.75.New windows and doors separating the sunroom from conditioned space meet the building thermal envelope
requirements.
Materials Identification and Installation:
� Materials and equipment are installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions.
� Insulation is installed in substantial contact with the surface being insulated and in a manner that achieves the rated R-value.
� Materials and equipment are identified so that compliance can be determined.
� Manufacturer manuals for all installed heating and cooling equipment and service water heating equipment have been provided.
� Insulation R-values,glazing U-factors,and heating equipment efficiency are clearly marked on the building plans or specifications.
Duct Insulation:
� Supply ducts in attics are insulated to a minimum of R-8.All other ducts in unconditioned spaces or outside the building envelope are
insulated to at least R-6.
Duct Construction and Testing:
� Building framing cavities are not used as supply ducts.
� All joints and seams of air ducts,air handlers,filter boxes,and building cavities used as return ducts are substantially airtight by means
of tapes,mastics,liquid sealants,gasketing or other approved closure systems.Tapes,mastics,and fasteners are rated UL 181A or
UL 181 B and are labeled according to the duct construction.Metal duct connections with equipment and/or fittings are mechanically
fastened.Crimp joints for round metal ducts have a contact lap of at least 1 1/2 inches and are fastened with a minimum of three
equally spaced sheet-metal screws.
Exceptions:
Joint and seams covered with spray polyurethane foam.
Where a partially inaccessible duct connection exists,mechanical fasteners can be equally spaced on the exposed portion of the
joint so as to prevent a hinge effect.
Continuously welded and locking-type longitudinal joints and seams on ducts operating at less than 2 in.w.g.(500 Pa).
� Duct tightness test has been performed and meets one of the following test criteria:
(1)Postconstruction leakage to outdoors test:Less than or equal to 316.3 cfm(8 cfm per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area).
(2)Postconstruction total leakage test(including air handler enclosure): Less than or equal to 474.5 cfm(12 cfm per 100 ft2 of
conditioned floor area)pressure differential of 0.1 inches w.g.
(3)Rough-in total leakage test with air handler installed:Less than or equal to 237.2 cfm(6 cfm per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area)
when tested at a pressure differential of 0.1 inches w.g.
(4)Rough-in total leakage test without air handler installed:Less than or equal to 158.2 cfm(4 cfm per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area).
Heating and Cooling Equipment Sizing:
� Additional requirements for equipment sizing are included by an inspection for compliance with the International Residential Code.
� For systems serving multiple dwelling units documentation has been submitted demonstrating compliance with 2009 IECC Commercial
Building Mechanical and/or Service Water Heating(Sections 503 and 504).
Circulating Service Hot Water Systems:
� Circulating service hot water pipes are insulated to R-2.
� Circulating service hot water systems include an automatic or accessible manual switch to turn off the circulating pump when the
system is not in use.
Heating and Cooling Piping Insulation:
� HVAC piping conveying fluids above 105 degrees F or chilled fluids below 55 degrees F are insulated to R-3.
Swimming Pools:
� Heated swimming pools have an on/off heater switch.
� Pool heaters operating on natural gas or LPG have an electronic pilot light.
� Timer switches on pool heaters and pumps are present.
Exceptions:
Where public health standards require continuous pump operation.
Where pumps operate within solar-and/or waste-heat-recovery systems.
Project Title: Forrest Road Duplex-West Report date: 05/10/11
Data filename:C:\Users\Megan\Documents�Active Energies\Jobs�2007�Forrest Road West crawl.rck Page 5 of 6
. �
� Heated swimming pools have a cover on or at the water surface.For pools heated over 90 degrees F(32 degrees C)the cover has a
minimum insulation value of R-12.
Exceptions:
Covers are not required when 60%of the heating energy is from site-recovered energy or solar energy source.
Lighting Requirements:
� A minimum of 50 percent of the lamps in permanently installed lighting fixtures can be categorized as one of the following:
(a)Compact fluorescent
(b)T-8 or smaller diameter linear fluorescent
(c)40 lumens per watt for lamp wattage<=15
(d)50 lumens per watt for lamp wattage>15 and<=40
(e)60 lumens per watt for lamp wattage>40
Other Requirements:
� Snow-and ice-melting systems with energy supplied from the service to a building shall include automatic controls capable of shutting
off the system when a)the pavement temperature is above 50 degrees F,b)no precipitation is falling,and c)the outdoor temperature is
above 40 degrees F(a manual shutoff control is also permitted to satisfy requirement'c').
Certificate:
� A permanent certificate is provided on or in the electrical distribution panel listing the predominant insulation R-values;window
U-factors;type and efficiency of space-conditioning and water heating equipment.The certificate does not cover or obstruct the visibility
of the circuit directory label,service disconnect label or other required labels.
NOTES TO FIELD:(Building Department Use Only)
Project Title: Forrest Road Duplex-West Report date: 05/10/11
Data filename:C:\Users\Megan\Documents�Active Energies\Jobs�2007\Forrest Road West crawl.rck Page 6 of 6
r�
.
2009 IECC Energy
Efficiency Certificate
. .
Ceiling/Roof 49.00
Wall 21.00
Floor/Foundation 10.00
Ductwork(unconditioned spaces):
�.. . .
Window 0.30 0.26
Door 0.43 NA
. .. . .
Heating System:
Cooling System:
Water Heater:
Name: Date:
Comments:
. �
�LKP Engineering, Inc.
��v�����.����.
4t>IL Atit7i �'OL!tinATIOti' INi%ESTiGAT[Oi'r'
FOR THE
PR()f'C)SEU FC)kES7' ROAU DUY!<EX
LOT �, F3r.00'K (, ti'Alt. �'i(.L;�GE 6'� FILi�(U
bl6 POREST' ItOAD
TO�i'ti OF �'AlL
EAC�LE COt'�TY, C'OLORAD�
FROJTCT NO. 100G1
DI:C'Fi1�lI3E;lt 2�t, 2(l10
Ca�"������� ���'�'`�,�
c1 :`:,; ,; ;c��
r �'��
a ` :�
•
-a; ��'S�'�
�,.
�` ��---�
e �� �
3 * � �:-r�
���.��� ���.s-,..�
:�r ��� ��.
V'
PREPaEtFD FOit:
�IR. SCOTT TURNIPSEED
5COTT S. TUR\(PSErD,AlA
P.U. BOX 3388
Er�GLI:, COLORADO 816321
t�.0. Bo�28's7, Lc�wards.CO S 1632 'fcl{970)9?6-90$8. Fax(970)426-9089
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l
SCOPE OF STUDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l
SITL DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II,
I
PROPOSED CONSTRCICTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
FIEL D IN VESTIGA T[ON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
SUBSURFACE SOIL AND GROUNUWA'I'ER CONDI"t�1UN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
SLA B CONSTR UCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
RETAINfNGWA L LS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
U1v'DERDRAIN SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
S1TE GKA UING AN D DKA1N AG E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
LA WN IRRIGATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
LIi�9iTATiOTJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
FIGURES
LOCATION SKETCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DRA WING NO. 1
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOGS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EIGURE NO's 1 & 2
SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FIGURE NO's 3-4
PERIMETER DRA1N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .FIGURE NO. 5
LKP Engineering, Inc.
i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The proposed duplex should be supported
on the undisturbed clayey-sandy gravel with
cobbles and boulders, with conventional type
spread footings, designed for a maximum allowable i
soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf. See Foundation �
Recommendations,
SCOPE OF STUDY
This report presents the results of a subsurface Soil and Foundation Investigation for a
proposed duplex to be constructed c�n Lot 5, Block l, Vait Village 6`h Filing, at 616 Forest Road,
Town of VaiL Eagle County, Colorado. The purpose of the subsurface soil and foundation
investigation was to determine the engineering characteristics of the foundation soil and to
provide recommendations from a geotechnical point of view for the foundation design, grading,
and drainage. Geologic hazard studies are oulside vf our scope of services.
SITE DESCRIPTION
Lot 5 is a 1.034-acre lot, on the south side of the west portian of Forest Road, in the Vail
Willage Subdivision, 6`�'Fifing,Town of Vai(, Eagle County, Colorado. The topography of the lot
is moderate to steep. Drainage is to the north and northwest. Vegetation on the lot consisted of
an aspen forest with few pines. There was one to two feet of snow on the lot at the time of
drilting. Lot 5 has an existing dup(ex on it.All of the surrounding lots have buildings.
LKP Engineering, Inc.
�
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
We understand that the existing duplex will be replaced with a new duplex. The new
duplex wili have four stories stepping into the hillside. it will have a wood frame construction,
on a concrete foundation. Loads are anticipated to be light, typical of residential construction.
If the finalized plans differ significantly from the above understanding,we should be
notified to reevaluate the recommendations of this report. �
FIELD INVESTIGATION 'I
The field investigation, conducted on December 21, 2010, consisted of boring, logging
and sampling two test borings. The test boring locations are shown on Drawing Na. I. t)rilling
of the test borings was done with a 4-inch diameter, continuous tlight, power auger, on a rubber
track mounted drill rig. We show the soil profiles of the test borings on the Subsurface
Exploration Logs, Figure No's one and two. Soil samples for laboratory soil analysis and
observation were taken at selected intervals by advancing Standard Split Spoon and California
Samplers with an automated 140-pound hammer, falling 30 inches.
SUBSURFACE SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITION
The soil profiles encountered in the test bc�rings were fairly uniform. Boring No. I had
about four feet of fill with topsoil and dark sand over light to yellowish brawn, clayey sand over
brown, clayey-sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders to the maximum depth explored of 21
feet, where refusal was encountered. Boring No. 2 also had s�me fi(I with topsoil, road base and
sand,over brown, sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders to the maximum depth explored of 19
feet. Ground water was not encountered in either boring at the time of drilling. Test boring No. 2
was drilled with a 6-inch auger and was filled once drilling was complete.Test boring number
one was left open and was covered with a rock for future observation of possible ground water.
LKP Engineering, Inc.
3
At a follow up site visit,48 hours after the drilling,there was no water in the test boring. The 4-
inch auger was sheared off on the gravel in test boring number one, and the bottom half
remained in the hole.
We sampled the soil in the test borings at random intervals. The soil samples were
brought to our laboratory for observation and analysis.
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed residence should be supported �vith conventional type spread fo�tings,
designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf. The footings should be
placed on undisturbed sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders. To prevent the potential af a
differential settlement, we recommend that the entire foundation be constructed on the clayey,
sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders.
The tcndersignecl engineer shottict obsen�e the fozrndation excavation to verify that the soil
conditions are as antici�ated from ihe burings. For cmv additional foundati�n alternatives,
plea.se contact our o�ce.
��1fe recommend a minimum ti�-idth of 16 in;:hes for the continuaus footings and 2 feet for
the isolated footing pads. Continuous foundation wal(s should be well reinforced,top and
bottom,to span an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. A minimum backfill cover as required
by the {ocal building department should be provided for frost protection of the footing subsoils.
The foundation excavation should be free from excavation spoils, frost, organics and
standing water. Any overexcavation within the proposed foundation, should be backfi(led, in 8
inches loose, level lifts and compacted to 98%of the maximum dry density and within 2 percent
of the optimum moisture content as determined in a laboratory from a Standard Proctor test
(ASTM D-698). Structural fill,placed under footings,should be tested by the engineer or her
representatives on regular basis.
LKP Engineering, lnc.
4
SLAB CONSTRUCTION
The natural on-site soils, exclusive offill, topsoil, and organics,are suitable to support
lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction. The subgrade for the slab-on-grade construction
should be proof compacted to detect and remove soft spots. They should backfill over-excavated
soft spots and other underslab fill with the on-site soil, free from topsoil and organics,or other
suitable material, compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum standard Proctor
density(ASTM D-698). Suitable materiai should be free from topsoil, organics and rock '
fragments greater than 3 inches.
The c�ricrete slab should be c�tistructed over-a 4-inch layer of clean gravel consistina of'
-3/4 inch gravel with at least 50°o retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 3 percent passing the
Na 200 sieve.
They� should reinforce the concrete slab-on-grade and score control joints according to
the American Concrete Institute requirements and per the recommendations of the designer to
reduce damage due to shrinkage. The concrete slab should be separated from the foundation
walls and caiumns with expansion joints to allow for independent movement with�ut causing
damage.
RETAINING WALLS
Foundation walls retaining earth and retaining structures that are laterall�- supported
should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid density of 60 pcf for an "at-rest" condition.
Laterally utirestrained structures retaining the on-site earth should be designed to resist an
equivatent fluid density of 40 pcf for the "active"case.
Passive earth pressure of 300 psf can be used for the lateral pressure against the sides of
the footings. Resistance to sliding at the bottom of the footings can be calculated based on a
coefficient of friction of 0.50. Undisturbed soil or a structural,non-swelling fill compacted to
100 percent of the maximum dry density and within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content
LKY Engineering, Inc.
5
shall be used to resist lateral loads at the sides of the footings.
The above design recommendations assume drained backtill conditions and a horizontal
backfill surface. Surcharge loading due to adjacent structures, weight of temporary stored
construction materials and equipment, inclined backfill and hydrostatic pressure due to
undrained backfill should be incorporated in the design. E��ery attempt should be made to
prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the retaining wall.
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM
To reduce the risk of surfac•e water infiltrating the foi�ndation subs�il, installation of a
foundation perimeter drain is recommended (see Figure No. 5}. Even though, ground water was
not encountered during the drilling or at the follo�v up reading 24 hours aftei•the drilling, it is
anticipated that ground water seepage will be present, especia(ly during the spring runoff and
snow melt. We recommend a perimeter drain behind every step of the foundation. The
foundation perimeter drain should consist of a minimum size of a 4-inch diameter perforated
pipe sloped to a suitable gravity outlei, or to a sump pump location. if ground water, or signs of
fluctuatinD ground water levels are encountered during construction, we should be contacted for
an additional coi}sultation and/or n;odification of the underdi�aii� recorn�nendatioj�s. Tl}e drair;
should siope at 1/4 inch per foot if flexible or at 1/8 of an inch if rigid pipe is used. The bottom
of the trench adjacent to the footing should be lined with a polyethylene moisture barrier glued to
the foundation wail. The drain pipe should be placed over the moishire barrier and covered with
a minimum of 6 inches of-3/4 inch free-draining granular material. Geotextile(Mirafi 140N or
equivalent) should be used to cover the free-draining gravel to prevent siltation and clogging of
the drain. The backfill above the drain should also be free draining, granular material to within 2
feet of the ground surface to prevent a buildup of hydrostatic pressure. The top one foot of the
backfill material should consist of a relatively impervious fill. The backfill should be sloping
away from the building.
LKP Engineering, Inc.
6
SITE GRADING AND DRAINAGE
The site surrounding the building structure should slope away from the building in all
directions. A minimum of 12 inches in the first 10 feet is recommended in unpaved areas,and
three inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. The top of the granular foundation backfill
should be covered with a minimum of one foot of relatively impervious fill to reduce the
potential of surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoils. Exterior backfill should be
compacted at or near the optimum moisture content to at least 95%of the maximum standard
Proctor density under pavement, sidewa(k and patio areas and to at least 90°/o of the maximum
standard Proctor density under landscaped areas. Mechanical methods of compaction shau(d be
used. Do not puddle the foundation excavation.
Permanent, unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at t�vo horizontai to one
vertical or flatter with slope heights not exceeding 20 feet. Slopes exceeding 20 feet should have
benching incorporated. To protect the newly created slopes, erosion control methods sh�uld be
used. Also,drainage of the site above the slopes should be controlled to prevent slope instability.
If water seepage is encountered during the slope construction,additional studies ��rill be required
to evaluate the slope stability.
Surface water naturaliy draining toward the proposed building site sh�uld he diverted
around and away from it by means of drainage swales or other approved methods. The roof
drains and downspouts should extend and discharge beyond the limits of the backfill.
LAWN IRRIGAT[ON
It is not recommended to introduce excess water to the foundation soils by instal(ing
sprinkler systems adjacent to the building. The installation of the sprinkler heads should insure
that the spray from the heads wil( not fall within 10 feet of foundation walls, porches or patio
slabs. Lawn irrigation must be controlled.
LKP Engineering, Inc.
�
LIMITATIUN
This report has been preparcd arcording ro locall}�accepted professiona) Geoteehnical
engineering standar�s far simitar�i�e,tl�ods of testii�g and �oil eondition�at this time. There is n�
ather���arranry either expressed or implied.
"I'he findings and recommendations of this report are based or� feld expioration.
laboratc�r}�testing of samples ohiained at the specific locatioiis shown on tt�e l..ocatic�n Sketcl�
Figun Nc�. 1 and on assumptions stated in tilr report. Soil cc�nditions at other locations mav van,
��•hich ma}'not become evideni until the foundation e�cavatian is cc�mpleted. If sc�il c�r�iat�r
ronditic�ns seerl� diftere��t fr�n� those describzd ir� this repart ���e sh�auld b� ce�ntacted immediate!}�
to ree��aluatr the 1•ecommendations of tliis repon.
�This repc�rt has t�:en prepared tor the exclusi��c use of Scot1 S. Turi�i�seed. f-ltA, for the
�ptcific applicati�n to tl�c prop�sed dupl�s to be constructed an t.,ot 5, I31ock 1. Vail b'ilia�e 6`"
�'ilin�, 61E� �orest Road. To«�n of Vail, ragle County. Colorado.
Sincerel}�, �� K
��.P.....�G'j�'
� � T ' -���rq,�'•.fi
LhP EI�GINEERIhC, I?�C. p�.•�1-�� �n��
` ,� ; �; �� �•�
�1' `� � �` � t� •�
ij��/ ��Lr^7 F �°�'���(/<i����"`''J��. ��7�C� ±
�� � ./ 0,�+•, .'��+
t -- c�• •. .,
Luiza Petrovska. PE �`r�tI�AL ��"�\�
1'� 1h`P Xd-LKP'420lU'.1U061gravcl.FLYT.��pd
I.KP En�ineerin�. Inc.
�'o
.�- o ��s�.
o � 'P��, �O�
� �
----s �,
�' G O
� _ �� �
�?J\ `\
/ /�^�_ � / `J
�eo�wc—�
J 1
� '��, \\ ' � i
' _, � � -, � f� (��
n � , ` � �
_ , \�
� -���.� F � , ��
��..,,",,� �;� �2 ;� �/ L
��' .,1 ,� � J � l U
� �
�t / a I
�Q o � �,t� �� �,
�\�� �, \ �i � �i`.,'� j�
p • �.� \\� ��� , '� i ..--� �` j� � �
� _
\\ � � �� c i} _,______
, � � O � A��t_ � �� Q ��—„� �
� ' O \ ��\ � � �/
� � �J
i � \ \�\\�p ;`j f_..
t
, ; ��� �, ,%�=
i` - \ \ \
i � \ �/
�� -' �� � i� /
__ ti ;;� � /
\� r� /
� - ��:,, �
_�_-� , � �
�`� � f �—�'n � � �,, �'�
� '� � �_ � ��._�\ � ��
� \.,� �' �`� :
,
'\ LOT 5 � � \ `
�- �_ 1.034�C,RES ��� , �
� ``�`_ `�°J a \ �s_ \� �`�\`.
� / , \, � . \ \ � �.
�'`. � \.�� � ��
� � �--e�\ �� - -
O \
0
p � o
O
` - � r� � � �
LOCATION SSrsTCB
civn./csoTSCm�ccei.
FOREST ROAD DUPI.EX `"�TN°" foosf
LKP El2g''IIl ee1'lllg", In c. ior�, a�oar�, �,w. ►zcucF een Fuwc � � �- = gp•
616 FqREST ROAD
td (9� �9088E fmQ(0.97092839089 �NL. EAQLf GIOIMTY, G101LaRADO Ati1NeNGMOt: '
DATE 08SfRYED: DECEMBER 21, 2010 BORING N0. 1
ELEVAl10N:
S S �'
Y A
DEP7H BLOWS M M DESCR/PIION OF MATER/AL LABQRATORY REMARKS
�T � B P AND SAMPLE tOCA7lOV�t TEST R£SULTS '
0 L '
L E
— FILL, CONSISTING OF DARK
_ BROWN SAND, TOPSOIL AND
GRA VEL
— 00= 98.6 pcf
�2/�2 o MC= 5.5 �'
—s ,F:' L/GHT TO YELLOWISH BROWN,
__ ;.�j CLAY£Y SAND
— :�.
— x D0= 106.7 pcf
�/�2 �.:': o MC= 17.3 %
_ �o _ BROWN, CtA YEY, SAND Y GRA VEL
- W)TH COBBLES AND BOULDERS
— Bou/der � 11'
Boulder � 13'
— �/�2 -' : p MC= 6.3 .�' Sample too
— 15 �acky to load
Boulder c� 18'
— 2o/s : ■
— �o
REFtlSAL � 21 feet No Ground Water
— Encountered
— zs
I�GEND:
O — 2—dnch O.D. Colifomta Liner Somp/e DD — Noturol Ory Density (pcf)
■ — Split Spoon MC — Notural Moistu�e Cantent (�')
24/12 — Drivr samp/e bJow count /ndicofes thot 24 blows —200 — Percent Passtng No. 200 Siev�
of a 140—pound hammer fo/ling 30 inches were LL — Uquid Limit
required to drive the Colifomia or the Split Spoon P� — Piasticity/ndex
Sampler 12 inches. GW — Ground water
r,wa:
LKP ENGINEERING, INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG o4127
AouaE aa: �
DATE OBSERVED: DECEMBER 21, 2010 BORING N0. 2
ELEYAl10N:
S S
Y A
DEPTN BLOWS �,/ M DESCR/PAON OF AIAIER/AL LABORATORY REAIARKS
�ET �'� B P AND SAMPLE LOCA710N TFST RESULTS
D L
L E
— FlLL, CONSlS71NG OF ROAD BASE,
_ SAN� AND TOPSOIL
20/3 ❑ ROCK !N SAMPLE
— s BROWN, CLAYEY SAND W1TH
GRA 1/EL, COBBLES AND
BOULDERS
— - MC= 9.5 % Somple tao
2g��2 �� � rocky to lood
�
— �o
BouJder � 13'
— 24��2 _ ❑ MC= 6.5 X Samp/e too
— t5 " rocky to lood
4�/�2 =� ■
BOTIOM OF BOR/NG � 19 feet No G�ound Water
— zo Encountered
— ss
LEGEND:
O — 2—Jnch O.D. Ca/ifomia Uner Samp/e DO — Naturo/ Dry Densfty (pcf)
■ — Split Spoon A/C — NaturaV Moisture Confe�nt (.t7
24/12 — Dr!►ae sample b/ow count JndTcates that 24 blows —200 — Percent Possing No. 20D SJeve
of o 140—pa�nd hammer falla�g 30 Jnches were LL — Uqu/d Umlt
requ/red to drire the Ca/ifornla or the Split Spoon P/ — P/astJclfy lndex
Sampler 12 lnches GW — Ground woter
r�aFCr na:
LKP ENGINEERING, INC. SUBSURFACE �LORATION LOG ���
r�u�Ma: 2
1
o .
� , i �
� i i ; -- - _ --- - -
� �
-� - _ _ �
� � ; { � j
� I
_2 __ � �__; � _ I � � . _ _ _ _� ;
� , � � � �
� � i
—3 __ _ �_--
I i ��_�_ __�—_ _.+ !
----_ ,
: I li � ! � ii � I iii
; .
i � I � � I � I i I ( i
4 ! - � � � � � -- -- - '
- � -'-- : ' � r � t � �
- - .. _ _;- _
i � i � ; -- i
� j i i ' � � i � I j � ii ;
-s ; � ' " ' � ' �
� � � : i �
� i I I � ' i i I � {
' � � i ' ' ' , I ! ! ; '
a � ; � , ' i il , ; � � i
- '_ � � � fi __ ___-- ; +!-i
s
° � i ' � � , �� � i � � � I �
k , � � � � � � � ; ( i
� -� ---�- i I I ii � i j ; j � I ij �
, '
,
--�— - '
-- + 1-� ! ! — I
� i � i i I � li ( � I i � l
� 8 I � ( �
— -- � -
— -- i - - �-
' ; : , �
e � ; ;
,
i..
�
o � � i ;
� , ; ! (
� � � � � i
+ i ;
y -9 -- _ � - ' t�— -- � �- ' 1 _ _ __ ! ' �
---
�
� I
a ! ( i l I I I � i � I � � � �
, , , ;
o � I I __ _' __ � i i i
� -�o C I � il I � � � �-- � � � ;
�
I ! � I I i I I I : ! i � I
I � � ; ; I � � I � ' I ! j
-ft
;
� �
i I � i
( � � i � � I_I ) i i
-12 __ � �
, . T r -�__... ----....� , i
_ _ _ __ - __ i iIj ( I i I I I iI
__ � _ � ! �
-13 4 - - ----- -- � a_
I I � _ -�-�
, � , _ ,_
I � i
i � i i i � ! I II
—14
�
—15 ' _ i
I
i
—16
0.1 1.0 10 f00
APPUED PR£S�IJRE — ksf
Somp/e of: Brown, grov+elly sand with topsoll from:B-1 at 4 feet
Natura/ Dry UnJt We/ght = 9�.6 pcf
Naturo/ Moisture Content = 5.5 percent
Na:
10061
LKP Enghieeerdn� lna SwelJ — Consolidation Test Resulfs �,�,,:
3
i
3 � I
► I � I I � �
11
z � _ _ _ _ _; ___�_ , ;
0
�
y � - ; _ -- , - - -- �
o �
W I I
a --+______ _ _ __ _-- � -
� _ __._ . - - -- �
I
k i i f i � �
-f -_- + _i I i i i I i i i
- - ---- -- .
� - i , - _ � �_ _
c , � I
o , , ; I
q, _ , � �
-2 -,--- f -; _ �--___ — �-T M _ _ ___ —�-__ __ � � �
� � I � ! I � � i ' � � � � � �
U _3 � ` Iii �
� ! i I I
� � � � � � i I ' � ( j I I I
; , ; ;
� � I
� � � ;
� i ; � , � ; � ; � I
-4 - L- !.--�-_l_i_�__ � , I _1 L_� L� i I 1_ 1 !_J_L�
D.l .0 10 100
APPUED PRESSURE - ksf
_ _ _ _ _- -
- -_ __
Somple of: Lt to yellowish-brown, doyey sond fran: 8-1 at 9 feet
Naturo! Dry Unit Weight = 106.7 pcf
Natura/ Molsture Contenf = 17.3 percent
�:
LKP Eng�ieerPng, l/!� Swe!l — Consolidation Test Resu/ts 1��
��.:
4
., �
• OPE AWAY fROM BU/tD/NG
; . :+ c�
.. _.
� � .� - OVFR BApCFltL W/77/ 71M� FFET
° ' � OF RELA77VELY lM/P£RVIOUS SOIL
: •. � . .
► D�
v
�. .
i : ,
D
� J� � -
: 3 ° _: -=�''=;� :-:-''�:::�— _
-- - - �=�}--- -- :.,...-::�
.a ��� J ;y.~ :�.fj�:�' _ .�r . _c —
D�0 . - .j= -- ,-�r_r:- —
� r� - �'F:�F=��- ' _ f�,' ,,.}.�_.:..r.^- `�
'� .�� ir��' ���
.. � O .s D '..r:� - , .. -'•f- . - _ --- - �
.,Z _ _ -GRANULAR.`FILL�-_:"'��.-= c;�
� J � ' _ _ ;.y_�,•; :;;;`<:
�a D ' > - -�Y�.: ;.�, r?..�:.:."< ' .✓,-...r i
0 c "._ 's•3^`�'i-
� ,� _�c: __'�-n���= +° �,7i;r:>.•- _ '�/\/
��• :� - "'= _- -- - � ALTE'R fABR1C (M/RAF7
� � - :�� = - - � ;:;'� 140N OR E4tJlVAL£NT)
� • ' - --- -
•' .:. . � '� " '�:'=-•���•::'•�" - .
• . • .. . :Q.:�•.,•�•. -....�-
, : : . . � .• .�.. �.:.,.;�� .
�:� `�°.� FOO TING . � � :'� .' .=�ci�.:�D.:c�.�::.0���.:"' �
: .
� , . . �.. : . .q��.-...:Q_ � .� ��O
� �' ' , � . D . ' '. .. �p -
�.�•�• �
/\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ / • . /� INUS 3/4-/NCH D/AME7ER, COARSE,
\\�\ � CLEAN CRUSN ROCK
30 M/L M/N/MUM IHICXCNESS, -1NCH DlAMETER P£RFORATEU P/PE SLOPfD
PLASIIC UNER, GLUED TO A DAYL/GNT LOCATIOAI A MlN/MUM OF 30
7NE FOUNDA7)ON WALL FFET AWAY FROM 7HE FOtJNDAAON AT
f/4-1NCH PER FOOT FOR FLEX/BL£ AND
1/8-INCH M/N1MUM FOR R/GYD PIPE
-- Pls'RI�lETER DRAIN
- _ civu./csorsc�ncsr.
FOREST l�OAD DUPLEX P10`�`"n` foos�
LKP - EIIglII @eT3I2g'� III C. cor s, acoa� � �iuc ►xuc,�em� � N.T.S.
616 FqREST RAAD
P.O. Box ?$37 EdNarda. CO 81632 Vi1R. FACLE GIDUNTY, G�QRADO t1i0i1AE Na:
cd (s�o) e2s-soee r� (s�o) sza--� 5
�1 �� 0 ���
�1 �- �� 35
�
. �
18050Z-DS
in Oil Rubbed Bronze from the Freeport family
Width: 10"
Height: 15.25"
Weight: 8 Ibs.
Glass: Clear Seedy Glass
Bulb: One 100w Medium Base
�' Voltage: � 120v
TTO: 3.25"
Extension: 11.25"
Back Plate Height: 9.5"
Back Plate Width: 5.75"
UPC: 640665180510
Notes: Dark Sky Fixture
NOTES:
--- - --- --- - -------_--- - -----
----
II
Item Qty Part Number Description Notes
1 1 18050P / OZ Freeport Series Pull from stock make into ESDS (Energy Saving DS)
2 1 170001 Caution Risk of Fire Label
3 1 170002 Suitable for Wet Location
4 1 S2000DS-AL Tapered Dark Sky Can
5 1 ENGU386 GU24�Tl�readed Socket
g 2 - Threaded Socket Ring
7 1 OOGU2426 26w CFL GU24 Lamp
8 1 N1802BR 1/81P x 2" Long Nipple
9 1 170024 Prop 65 Waming Label <Not Shown>
Revised Drawing
Rev A 6/29/2010
114„
cauno►i:
PREDENCE:
2
—_ 8
HMKLEY 11GN11MG
1
3
"� �,�
�s.�o. a
7 4
2s watt �
GU24
CFL Lamp
15�"
4
G���
i
� N � �
�
MP�'`
e
� �
� 5
Gode.
� p ow.wN ev: Rob 1 �62E��� T�T�E: Freeport Series ESDS
C _ CHECKED BY: _ DATE Energy Savings Dark Sky Option
HINKLEY@ B - PROPRIETARYANDCONFIDENTIAL REV
THEINFORMAI%kICONT/.MEDMTMIS SIZE DWG. NO.
DRAMANGISiME50LEPROPERTVOF A 1805-ESDS A
L I G H T I N G Chan ed socket and added N1802BR 6/29/10 RI �MKLEY LIGHTING.ANY REPRODUCTpN
A 9 INPARTORASAW110LEWfTHOIffTHE
desi • illuminote •en WPoITENPERNSSI�NOFHMIQEYl1GMi1NG
qn j�y No. rtEVISION DATE: BY: �s ar�on�rrEO. SCALE:3IB SHEET 1 OF 1
----_ � _��'�� �
��
� �
'' � � �S _ o�J�'
�`� '�i �I ( 0��3 �
07-01-2013 inspection Re e orting Page 1
m
Requested Inspect Date: Tuesday July 02 2013
� l I_O� 2� Site Address: 616 FOR�ST RD�/AIL
�( J EAST UNIT
A/P/D Information
Activity: B11-0134 Type: COMBO Sub Type: NDUP Status: ISSUED
Const Type: Occupancy: Use: R-3 Insp Area:
Owner: PRINCE VICTORIA LLLP
Contractor: SCOTT S.TURNIPSEED,AIA Phone: (970)328-3900
Description: PROPOSED NEW PRIMARY/SECONDARY DUPLEX TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE SITE W ITH
EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME TO BE DEMOLISHED. (EAST)
Reauested Ins�ection(s) ��l �p�- I��� �—U� 3� —� �l� � /'��2�S
1% l/ ✓
Rem: 534 PLAN-FINAL C/O Requested Time: 08:30 AM
Requestor: SCOTT S.TURNIPSEED,AIA Phone: (970)328-3900
Comments: 904-0263
Assigned To: BGIBSON En d By: JMONDRAGON K
Action: Time E :
� a� � .�
Item: 540 B DG-Final C/O Requested T e: 08:00 AM
Requestor: SCOTT S.TURNIPSEED,AIA Phone: (970)328-3900
Comments: 904-0263
Assigned To: SGREMMER Entered By: JMONDRAGON K
Action: Time Exp:
Insuection Historv
ftem: 70 BLDG-Misc. "Approved'*
02/09/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: radon piping al bsmt level.
03/02/12 Inspector: Martin Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: radon pipe in basemnt with plastic ok
06/14/12 Inspec�or: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: Radon piping completed
07/25/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: Lathe
10/22/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: snowmeft for driveway
02/20/13 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING **Approved'*
09/02/11 Inspector: rm Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: south side o�footer only
11/18/11 Inspector: Martin Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: See JR inspection foundation steel
06/07/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: footing for retamin�wall at NW side of site
Item: 210 PL 0 207%12 r-I sU e�ctor: JRM Approved" Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: EA�T UNIT ONLY 5#AIR TEST
Item: 20 BLDG-Foundation/Steel "Approved"
09/14/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: See plans for inspected and approved areas
11/04/11 Ins ector: JRIU Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: C�MPLETE
11/18/11 Inspector: Martin Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: Approved foundation walls for north 1/2 except east and west wing walls
11/22/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: walls for stairsboth sides
REPT131 Run Id: 14676
f
i
i
• °
o —
E-.
.
0
Q• •C•l, o
• E - N y
m.
04 W
a o
ti
U
0 i
V o
� o y g b A
o o o o
c
cu tt o
.
� 0� � W M o o
w o
o U H 3 ° oo y �; 0
-o z a� o o°' o c o co CI) -6 �
UG N 3 U
U v • �
N V N = a a. .
`I
-a U;
H .. vd°
. o U •`�
W y � �° 3
o .� ' 0 ° w o
~ n z !DO H o w
bU ,. a) C
El co a�
o E ° w°
•
qi
,� o �.
0111 4
F+�1 a. bn
0.
�O �,
( f LL-.0. y,' N (. ti CO 4.
rri
u.
r ` 3 0 ° rn U
U c c _.. c 1.
i
• -o o c o °
6.
.o o '° m b 3 U y ct
E.- U o z Q o � a
f
1.
t
i