Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-039 Daily Field Report 92 SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 1/6/11 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 92A Sheet: 1 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Water Line Backfill 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 ECO Building Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 322 13'North, 18'East of Gridlines A.0/8.0 -2.0± 131.1 7.7 127.0 8.8 97 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 323 3.5'East of Gridlines A.3/8.0 -4.0-�- 131.1 7.7 126.8 10.7 97 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 324 I S'North,22'East of Gridlines A.0/8.0 -3.5± 131.1 7.7 126.5 11.0 96 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 325 13'North,21'East of Gridlines A.0/8.0 -2.0-}- 131.1 7.7 124.6 ll1 95 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sum� ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 31 -38°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95°/o of Standard Proctar ASTM D 698, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind, 1-7umping jack Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test backfill for the water line. Although the moisture content was above the optimum moisture Number of Passes: Varies Thiekness of Lift: 8 inches content by mare than 2 percent,the soils in this area were not pumping. The moisture was Method of Adding Moisture: None high, but activities will shut down today until spring, and the area will dry below the Tl�is re�ort prasents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit gl'OUnCl IleateT'S anCl blanl{etS. 1'0St T'OSUItS 1riCI1Cat0 t111t mO1StUT'0 1nCl C10nSlty teStS We have relied on the co��tractor to continae applying the recommended compactive effort and moishire to the fill during perfOT'ri10C1 1t t110 riOteC110Cat10riS 118V0 TTlet j7T'OJOCt S]J0C1f1Cat1011S. times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's'ud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 1/6/11 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 92B Sheet: 2 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 18 - 39°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footing, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Interior Slabs-on-grade LoCatlon of Observatlons: Gridlines A.0-A.7/0.0-0.3,A.7-B.0/0.0-3.3,A.7-C.0/0.0-33,A.0-C.0/3.3-6.1,and A.3-C.0/33-6.1 Sheet or Plan Number: 5101, 1/5316 typ for 8" slab, 1/5316 typ for 6" slab, SOG 6A, and 6/5350 Meets Project Spec. Interior Slab-on-grade Rebar: Gridlines A.0-A.7/0.0-03,A.7-B.0/0.0-33,and A.7-C.0/0.0-33 yes no Bottom: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. east to west � ❑ Top: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. east to west � ❑ Top: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-4"o.c. north to south � ❑ Bottom: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c. north to south, observed � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-2.5" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Interior Slab-on-grade Rebar: Gridlines A.0-C.0/3.3-6.1 and A3-C.0/3.3-6.1 yes no Bottom: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. east to west � ❑ Bottom: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-4"o.c. north to south � ❑ Perimeter: Size: #5 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 5'-3"for#5 � ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By