Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-039 Daily Field Reports 1 to 5 SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 8/17/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 1 Sheet: 1 of 1 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Shoulder Embankment Backfill 1309 Elkhorn Drive South Edge of Frontage Road Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 1 Sta.00+00,30'Right of centerline -2.0± 130.3 7.9 111.2 9.0 85 Fail Curve#1 densit SAND Gravell Sil 2 Sta.00+10,30'Right of centerline -1.0-�- 130.3 7.9 104.3 ll.4 80 Fail Curve#1 density SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sum� ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 75°F± ❑ Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 100%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99, � Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content 1 and 2 and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: Unknown � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: Unknown Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test backfill being placed south of the frontage road. Test results indicate that moisture and density Number of Passes: Unknown Thickness of Lift: Unknown tests performed at the noted locations have failed to meet project specifications. Method of Adding Moisture: Unknown Tl�is re�ort prc.sents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit. We have relied on the contractor to continue applying the recommended co�npactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecificatio�s. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 8/20/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 2 Sheet: 1 of 1 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 80°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested,to perform moisture and density testing on fill in the"Green Area"adjacent to the frontage road widening project. Upon arrival, field engineer was informed by the contractor that they were not ready for testing and field engineer could test fill placed that day on the next visit. Therefore,no moisture and density testing was performed during this site visit. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 8/23/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 3 Sheet: 1 of 1 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 72°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested,to perform moisture and density testing at the Lionshead frontage road widening project. Upon field engineer's arrival, the contractor was not placing fill. Field engineer spoke with Chris with the Town of Vail, who informed him that the fill that will be placed in the current exca�ation is in the norr structural"Green Area"and no tests will be necessary in this area. Therefore,no moisture and density testing was performed during this site visit. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 8/24/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 4 Sheet: 1 of 1 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Waterline at East Tie-in and below Footing 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 West of Parking Garage Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 3 East Waterline Tie-in -9.0± 130.3 7.9 123.7 9.0 95 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 4 Footing West of parking garage,north end Final 130.3 7.9 130.5 8.4 100 Pass Curve#1 Grade± SAND Gravell Sil 5 Footing West of parking garage,south Final 130.3 7.9 131.8 6.8 100 Pass Curve#1 end Grade± SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sum� ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 80°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%(water tie-in)and 98%(footing)of Standard ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) Proctor AASHTO T 99,+2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 2-Tracichoes, 1-Loader � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Sheepsfoot, 1-Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test the fill far the waterline at the east tie-in and the fill below the footing west of the parking garage. Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 12 inches Test results indicate that moisture and densiry tests performed at the noted locations have Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck met project specifications. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied m�the contractar to continue applying the recomme�ded compactive effort and moisture to the fill duri�g times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i�ions on whether the 611 meets s ecificatio�s. Dan Blumberg Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 8/25/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 5 Sheet: 1 of 1 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Waterline Backfill 1309 Elkhorn Drive Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborato Field Depth Mauimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cfj (%) c� (%) 6 Sta.9+00 -2.0± 130.3 7.9 129.8 6.0 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND,Gravell ,Sil 7 Sta.8+50 -4.0± 130.3 7.9 131.3 7.2 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 8 Sta.8+00 -5.0± 130.3 7.9 130.1 7.5 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sunn ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 80°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 100°/o of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2°/o of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test waterline backfill. Test results indicate that moisture and density tests performed at the Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches noted locations have met project specifications. Method of Adding Moisture: N/A This report prosents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on the contractar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill duri��g times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as belicved necessary to calibrate our observer's'ud*ment Test data are not the sole basis for o inions on whether the till meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By