The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-039 Daily Field Reports 18 to 21 SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 9/17/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 18A Sheet: 1 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 18-inch Storm Sewer Line Backfill 1309 Elkhorn Drive Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborato Field Depth Mauimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cfj (%) c� (%) 43 Sta.3+00 Grade± 130.3 7.9 129.7 6.9 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 44 Sta.3+50 Grade± 130.3 7.9 130.3 6.5 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 45 Sta.4+00 Grade± 130.3 7.9 130.8 6.2 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sunn ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 75°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 100%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2°/o of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe, 1-Loader � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test backfill for the 18-inch storm sewer line. Test results indicate that moisture and density tests Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches performed at the noted locations have met project specifications. Method of Adding Moisture: N/A This report prosents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied o��the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moistu�e to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as belicved necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not tl�e sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecificatious. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 9/17/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 18B Sheet: 2 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 75°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Retaining Wall Location of Observations: West End of East Parking Structure, Gridlines E B to E-D Sheet or Plan Number: 11/5211 Meets Project Spec. Retaining Wall Rebar: West End of East Parkin Structure, Gridlines E-B and E-D yes no Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-0" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 9/18/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 19 Sheet: 1 of 1 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 24-inch Storm Sewer Line Backfill 1309 Elkhorn Drive Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborato Field Depth Mauimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cfj (%) c� (%) 46 Sta.00+05 -4.0± 130.3 7.9 131.0 6.0 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 47 Sta.00+15 -5.0± 130.3 7.9 130.2 6.5 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 48 Sta.00+25 -6.0± 130.3 7.9 129.8 6.7 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sunn ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 62°F± � Fill TestedMeets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 100%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2°/o of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test backfill for the 24-inch storm sewer line. Test results indicate that moisture and densiry tests Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches performed at the noted locations have met project specifications. Method of Adding Moisture: N/A This report pres•ents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on the co��tractar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are madc of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's'ud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 9/20/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 20A Sheet: 1 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 24-inch Storm Sewer Line and 1309 Elkhorn Drive Manhole Backfill Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 49 Sta.00+30 -3.0± 130.3 7.9 129.8 7.1 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 50 Sta.00+20 -2.0-E- 130.3 7.9 130.0 6.7 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 51 Manhole at Sta. 00+00,East side -1.0± 130.3 7.9 130.3 6.4 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 52 Manhole at Sta.00+00,West side Grade± 130.3 7.9 1311 6.2 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sum� � Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 70°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 100%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test backfill for the 24-inch storm sewer line and 1 foot away from Manhole at Sta. 00+00. Test results Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches indicate that moisture and densiry tests performed at the noted locations have met project Method of Adding Moisture: N/A specifications. Tl�is re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit. We have relied o�the coi�tractar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment Test data are not tlie sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 9/20/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 20B Sheet: 2 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 70°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Retaining Wall Location of Observations: Gridlines E A.3 to E-B and E-D to E-D.5 Sheet or Plan Number: Meets Project Spec. Retaining Wall Rebar: Gridlines yes no Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-0" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 9/22/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 21 Sheet: 1 of 1 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 18-inch Storm Line Backfill 1309 Elkhorn Drive Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborato Field Depth Mauimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cfj (%) c� (%) 53 Sta.4+g1 Grade± 130.3 7.9 129.9 6.2 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sunn ❑ Cloud � Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 60°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 100%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2°/o of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test backfill for the 18-inch Storm Line. Test results indicate that moisture and densiry tests performed Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches at the noted locations have met project specifications. Method of Adding Moisture: N/A This report prosents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to tlie fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as beli�ved necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment Test data are not the sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By