Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-039 Daily Field Reports 25 to 32 SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 9/28/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 25A Sheet: 1 of 3 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood-(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Grand Junction-(970)241-7700 Sanitary Sewer Line and Stair Fooring for 1309 Elkhorn Drive Existing Parking Structure Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 58 Sanitary Sewer Line: Sta.2+50 -7.0± 130.3 7.9 129.8 7.4 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 59 Sanitary Sewer Line: Sta.2+'75 -5.0-E- 130.3 7.9 130.0 7.1 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 60 Sanitary Sewer Line: Sta.3+25 -3.0± 130.3 7.9 130.2 6.9 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 61 Sanitary Sewer Line: Sta.3+50 -1.0-�- 130.3 7.9 131.0 6.3 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 62 Sanitary Sewer Line: Sta.4+00 Grade± 130.3 7.9 131.3 6.1 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 63 Stair Footing: Gridlines E-A/E-19 -3.0-E- 130.3 7.9 129.9 6.9 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 64 Stair Footing: Gridlines E-A/E-1 -3.0± 130.3 7.9 130.2 6.8 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sum� ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 74°F± � Fill TestedMeets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 100%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99,+2% ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) to-2°/o of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test sanitary sewer line backfill and the stair footing subgrade. Test results indicate that Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches moisture and density tests performed at the noted locations have met project Method of Adding Moisture: N/A specifications. Tl�is re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit. We have relied m�the contractor to continue applying the recomme�ded compactive effbrt and moisture to the fill duri�g times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i�ions on whether the fill meets s ecificatio�s. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 9/28/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 25B Sheet: 2 of 3 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 88°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Retaining Wall Footing Location of Observations: Gridlines E E/E-0 to E-1 Sheet or Plan Number: 5/5213 Meets Project Spec. Retaining Wall Footing Rebar: Gridlines yes no Horizontal: Size: 13 - #5 Spacing: Continuous at top and bottom � ❑ Vertical hook: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Dowels: Size: #9 Spacing: 0'-6" o.c. each face � ❑ Transversals: Size: #9 Spacing: 0'-6" o.c. bottom � ❑ Transversals: Size: #7 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. top � ❑ Planter Wall Dowel: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-0" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Retaining Wall Footing Rebar: Gridlines yes no Transversals: Size: 1 - #5 Spacing: 1'-0"top and bottom � ❑ Dowels: Size: 1 - #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Horizontal: Size: 8 - #5 Spacing: Continuous top � ❑ Horizontal: Size: 7 - #5 Spacing. Continuous bottom � ❑ Planter Wall Dowel: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-0" � ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 9/28/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 25C Sheet: 3 of 3 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 88°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Spread Footing and Columns Location of Observations: Gridlines E E.0 to �E.S/E-1.0 and�1.5 to E-3.0/E-A Sheet or Plan Number: 4/5311 and 6/5210 Meets Project Spec. Spread Footing Rebar: Gridlines E E.0 to E-E.5/E-1.0 yes no Drilled Dowels: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. Columns Rebar: Gridlines E l.5 to E-3.0/E-A yes no Vertical: Size: 8 - #5 Spacing: Evenly spaced ❑ � Ties: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. ❑ � Dowels: Size: 2 - #4 Spacing: Into existing precast beam ❑ � Dowels: Size: #8 Spacing: Match verticals ❑ � Diagonal hooks Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. ❑ � Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. ❑ � Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 9/29/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 26A Sheet: 1 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 72°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, to observe a proof-roll conducted in the westbound lane of South Frontage Road from Sta.6+50 to Sta. 9+00. The material observed was slightly silty sand with scattered cobbles. The proof-roll was performed using a fully loaded water truck. At the time of this observation, field engineer observed rutting and cracking of the subgrade in areas spauning 20 to 50 feet from approximately Sta. 1+00 to Sta. 8+50. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the subgrade has not been properly prepared and has failed to meet project specifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 9/29/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 26B Sheet: 2 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Sanitary Sewer Line Backfill and 1309 Elkhorn Drive Curb and Gutter Subgrade Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 65 Sanitary sewer line: Sta.4+25 -6.0± 130.3 7.9 129.9 7.5 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 66 Sanitary sewer line: Sta.4+50 -4.0-�- 130.3 7.9 1301 7.2 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 67 Sanitary sewer line: Sta.4+�5 -2.0± 130.3 7.9 131.0 6.8 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 68 Sanitary sewer line: Sta.4+g5 Grade± 130.3 7.9 131.4 6.4 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 69 Curb and Gutter: Sta.0+50,East side -0.8± 130.3 7.9 127.0 9.4 97 Fail Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sum� ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 75°F± � I�II Tested Meets Specifications for Test Numbers 65 to 68. Specification Compaction&Material: 100%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99,+2% � Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s)69 to-2°/o of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test sanitary sewer line back�ll and curb and gutter subgrade. Test results indicate that Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches moisture and density tests performed at the noted locations for sanitary sewer line backfill Method of Adding Moisture: N/A have met project specifications. However, test results indicate that moisture and density Tl�is re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit. tOStS p0T'fOT'mOCI 2t t110 nOt0C1 IOC2YlOriS f0Y CUYb 2riCl gUttOY SUbgT'aClO 1laS Fa1�CCl t0 IIleOt We have relied on the contractor to continue applying the recominended compactive effort and moisture to the fill during j7r0�0Ct S�J0C1�Cat10riS. times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as belicved necessary to calibrate our observer's jud inent Test data are not the sole basis for o inions on whether the fiLl meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 9/30/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 27A Sheet: 1 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 75°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, to observe the contractor compacting the subgrade for the curb and gutter on East Lionshead Circle on the west side from Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 4+00, on the east side from Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 4+00, and on the south side of Frontage Road from Sta. 6+25 to Sta. 8+50. The material being compacted with a jumping jack was a slightly silty sand with scattered cobbles. Field engineer probed the soil using a density pin. The material at the subgrade elevation was dense. Based on our observations and probing using a densiry pin, it is our opinion that the subgrade for the curb and gutter on East Lionshead Circle on the west side from Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 4+00, on the east side from Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 4+00, and on the south side of Frontage Road from Sta. 6+25 to Sta. 8+50 has been properly prepared and has met project specifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 9/30/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 27B Sheet: 2 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Curb and Gutter on South SidE 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 of Frontage Road Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 70 Retest of Test#69 -0.8± 130.3 7.9 129.8.0 9.7 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 71 Pan: Sta.7+00 Grade± 142.5 5.6 137.9 4.9 97 Pass Proctor by Others G sum Pit-'/a"ABC 72 Pan: Sta. 8+00 Grade± 142.5 5.6 137.2 5.4 96 Pass Proctor by Others G sum Pit-'/4"ABC 73 Curb and Gutter: Sta.6+50 Grade± 142.5 5.6 136.8 5.6 96 Pass Proctor by Others G sum Pit-'/a"ABC 74 Curb and Gutter: Sta.7+50 Grade± 142.5 5.6 138.0 4.8 97 Pass Proctor by Others G sum Pit-'/4"ABC 75 Curb and Gutter:West Side: Sta.2+00 Grade± 142.5 5.6 136.5 5.8 96 Pass Proctor by Others G sum Pit-'/a"ABC 76 Curb and Gutter:East Side: Sta.2+50 Grade± 142.5 5.6 137.2 5.5 96 Pass Proctor by Others G sum Pit-'/4"ABC Weather: � Sum� ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 60°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of Modified Proctor ASTM D 1557, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Bobcat � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Jumping jack, 1-Skid plate"vibe" Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test base course for curb and gutter on the south side of Frontage Road. Test results indicate that Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches moisture and density tests perfarmed at the noted locations have met project Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck specifications. This report presents opinions formcd as a result of our observations and/or com�action testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied m�the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effbrt and moisture to the fill duri�g times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i�ions on whether the fill meets s ecificatio�s. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/1/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 28A Sheet: 1 of 4 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 75°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, to observe the material exposed in the exca�ation for the spread footing along Gridlines E-E to E.F/90' West of E.1. The excavation varied in depth fram approximately 9 to 10 feet from the adjacent ground surface. The material. exposed in the base of the excavation consisted of a natural,gray to light brown, slightly moist,dense, slightly silty sand with scattered cobbles. Approximately 12 inches of ponded water was observed in the base of the excavation. The soils surrounding the ponded water were soft. No organic materials were observed in the excavation. The contractor excavated to approxirnately 18 inches in the area that had soft soils, placed geogrid, and then placed and compacted 3/4" angular rock. The rock extended beyond forms at 1/1 (Horizontal to Vertical) slope. The rock was compacted and was medium dense to dense. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the subgrade for the spread footing along Gridlines E E to E.F/90' West of E.1 has been properly prepared and has met project specifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/1/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 28B Sheet: 2 of 4 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Obs�rvation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Sand/Oil Linc Backfill 1309 Elkhorn Drive Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborato Field Depth Mauimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cfj (%) c� (%) 77 Sta.4+65 -3.0± 130.3 7.9 126.7 6.5 97 Fail Curve#1 SAND,Gravell ,Sil 78 Retest of Test#76 -3.0± 130.3 7.9 132.9 6.3 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 79 Sta.4+61 -2.0± 130.3 7.9 133.1 5.9 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 80 Sta.4+58 Grade± 130.3 7.9 131.2 6.4 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sunn ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 78°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 100%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99,+2% ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) to-2°/o of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk behind Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test sand/oil line backfill between Sta. 4+56 and Sta. 4+'71. Test results indicate that moisture Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches and density tests performed at the noted locations have met project specifications. Method of Adding Moisture: None/Water truck This report prosents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on the contractor to continue applying tl�e recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as belicved necessary to calibrate our observer's�ud ment. Test data are��ot the sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecificatim�s. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/1/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 28C Sheet: 3 of 4 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 80°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of St]'uCture: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footifl�, Slab-on-�rade, etC.): Side Wall of Pedestrian Bridge and Spread Footing Location of Observations: 15' West of Gridlines E-A/E-3.5 to E-4.0 and Drive-in/Drive-out 15' West of E-1/E-F Sheet or Plan Number: 12/5312 and 8/5212 Meets Project Spec. Side Wall of Pedestrian Bridge Rebar: Gridlines 15' West of Gridlines E-A/E-3.5 to E-4.0 yes no Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Spread Footing Rebar: Drive-in/Drive-out 15' West of Gridlines E-1/E-F yes no Transversals Size: #7 Spacing: 1'-0"at top � ❑ Transversals Size: #9 Spacing: 0'-6" at bottom � ❑ Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0"top and bottom � ❑ Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0"each face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-0" ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/1/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 28D Sheet: 4 of 4 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 75°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Spread Footing Location of Observations: 15' to 50' West of Gridlines E-1/E-F Sheet or Plan Number: 11/5213 Meets Project Spec. Spread Footing Rebar: 15' to 50' West of Gridlines E-1/E-F yes no Transversal Irbar Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Dowel: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Horizontal: Size: 7 - #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c., bottom � ❑ Horizontal: Size: 8 - #5 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c., top continuous � ❑ Planter Wall Dowel: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-0" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: Gridlines yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/2/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 29 Sheet: 1 of 1 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 56° - 71°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, to observe a proof-roll of the subgrade for the south side of the South Frontage Road between Sta. 4+40 to Sta. 5+59. The proof-roll was performed using a fully loaded water truck. The soil between Sta. 5+10 and Sta. 5+59 (25' x 49') was observed to be deflecting and pumping. Some deflection occurred between Sta. 4+87 and Sta. 4+96 (7' x 9.5') along the south side. The aforementioned areas have failed to meet project specifications. There was very slight to no deflection between Sta. 4+40 and Sta. 5+10. Excluding the 25' x 49' soft spot between Sta. 5+10 and Sta. 5+59, and the T x 9.5' spot on the south side between Sta. 4+87 and Sta. 4+96, the subgrade has been properly prepared and has met project specifications. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/4/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 30A Sheet: 1 of 4 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 70°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, to observe a proof-roll for subgrade on the South Frontage Road eastbound lane from Sta. 5+20 to Sta. 6+00 and on East Lionshead Circle from Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 1+50 (southbound lane). The proof-roll was performed using a fully loaded water truck. The subgrade consisted of a slightly silty sand and fr inch minus rock. At the time of the observation, field engineer did not observe any pumping or rutting of the subgrade. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the subgrade on the South Frontage Road eastbound lane from Sta. 5+20 to Sta. 6+00 and on East Lionshead Circle from Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 1+50 (southbound lane) has been properly prepared and has met project specifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/4/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 30B Sheet: 2 of 4 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Gas Line Sleeve and Pedestrian Bridge 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborato Field Depth Mauimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cfj (%) c� (%) 81 Gas line sleeve: Sta. 10+50 Grade± 130.3 7.9 130.9 6.1 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 82 Gas line sleeve: Sta. I 1+00 Grade± 130.3 7.9 1311 5.9 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 83 Pedestrian Bridge: 30'North of Gridlines -2.0± 130.3 7.9 129.8 7.0 100 Pass Curve#1 E-A/E-3.4 SAND Gravell Sil 84 Pedestrian Bridge: 35'North of Gridlines -1.0± 130.3 7.9 130.0 6.8 100 Pass Curve#1 E-A/E-3.5 SAND Gravell Sil 85 Pedestrian Bridge: 40'North of Gridlines Grade± 130.3 7.9 130.4 6.4 100 Pass Curve#1 E-A/E-3.6 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sunn ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 70°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 100%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99,+2% ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) to-2°/o of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Backhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested,to observe and test the fill placed for the gas line sleeve and base of the pedestrian bridge. Test results indicate that Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 to 12 inches moisture and density tests performed at the noted locations have met project Method of Adding Moisture: Hose specifications. This report prosents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on the cm�tractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i��ions on whether the fill meets s ecificatim�s. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/4/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 30C Sheet: 3 of 4 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 70°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): North Drl�e-I�Dr,�e-out waii and abutments Location of Observations: Gridlines E F/E-1.0 to 20' West of E-1.0 Sheet or Plan Number: 5200, 11/5212, and 12/5212 Meets Project Spec. North Drive-ii�/Drive-out Wall Rebar: Gridlines E-F/E-1.0 to 20' West of�1.0 yes no Horizontal: Size: #6 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ � ❑ � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-0" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Abutments Rebar: Gridlines E F/E-1.0 to 20' West of E-1.0 yes no Horizontal: Size: #7 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c. each face � ❑ Vertical: Size: #7 Spacing: 0'-9" o.c. each face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) No Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/4/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 30D Sheet: 4 of 4 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 70°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): South Drive-in/Drive-out Interior wall Location of Observations: Gridlines E E.7 to E-E.8/E-1.0 to 20' West of E-1.0 Sheet or Plan Number: 10/5212 Meets Project Spec. South Drive-in/Drive-out Interior Wall Rebal': Gridlines E-E.7 t0 E-E.g/E-1.� t0 2�' weSt Of Fr 1.� yeS ri0 Horizontal: Size: #6 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/5/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 31A Sheet: 1 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 65°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, to observe a proof-roll for the subgrade from Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 1+50 on the northbound lane of East Lionshead Circle. The proof-roll was performed using a fully loaded water truck. The subgrade consisted of slightly silty sand with scattered cobbles. At the time of this observation, field engineer did not observe any pumping or rutting of the subgrade. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the subgrade from Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 1+50 on the northbound lane of East Lionshead Circle has been properly prepared and has met project specifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/5/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 31B Sheet: 2 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 71°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Pedestrian Bridge - New Spandrel Beam Location of Observations: Northwest Corner of Existing Parking Structure Gridlines E-1.5 to E-2.5 Sheet or Plan Number: 5201 and 10/5210 Meets Project Spec. Pedestrian Bridge- New Rebar: Northwest Corner of Existing Parking Structure yes no Spandrel Beam Gridlines E 1.5 to E-2.5 Drilled dowels(epoxied): S1ze: #5 SpaCitlg: 0'-6" o.C. � ❑ Horizontal: Size: 2 - #7 Spacing: Top and bottom continuous � ❑ Horizontal: Size: 3 - #5 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Ties (hook): Size: #4 Spacing: 0'-6" o.c. � ❑ Dowels: Size: 2 - #5 Spacing: 1'-4" o.c. to miss beam pockets by 6" � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-0" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/6/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 32A Sheet: 1 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Curb and Gutter Final Grade 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 East Side of East Lionshead Circle Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 86 Sta.2+50 Grade± 142.5 5.6 116.7 3.6 82 Fail Proctor by Others G sum Pit-3/a"ABC 87 70' South of Information Booth Grade± 142.5 5.6 131.8 2.8 92 Fail Proctor by Others G sum Pit-3/a"ABC 88 Sta. 10+00 Grade± 142.5 5.6 136.7 4.0 96 Pass Proctor by Others G sum Pit-3/a"ABC 89 Sta. 9+00 Grade± 142.5 5.6 1371 3.8 96 Pass Proctor by Others G sum Pit-3/a"ABC Weather: ❑ Sum� ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : °F± ❑ Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of Modified Proctor ASTM D 1557, � Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content 86 and 87,and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Backhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Vibe plate Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test curb and gutter final grade on the east side of East Lionshead Circle. Test results indicate that Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 4 to 6 inches moisture and densiry tests performed at the noted locations have failed to meet project Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck specifications. Tl�is re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit. We have relied o�the coi�tractar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment Test data are not tlie sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/6/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 32B Sheet: 2 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 75°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Footing Location of Observations: Northeast and Northwest Parking Structure Stairways Sheet or Plan Number: 10/5214 Meets Project Spec. Footing Rebar: Northeast and Northwest Parking Structure Stairways yes no Transversals: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Horizontal: Size: 3 - #5 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Columns Vertical: Size: 8 - #7 Spacing: Evenly spaced � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: Gridlines yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By