Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-039 Daily Field Reports 33 to 45 REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/7/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 33A Sheet: 1 of 6 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 70°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, to observe a proof-roll for the westbound lane of Frontage Road between Sta. 6+50 and Sta. 10+00. The proof-roll was performed using a fully loaded water truck. The area observed was at grade and consisted of full depth reclaimed pulverized asphalt inillings. At the time of this observation, field engineer observed no pumping or rutting of the material at grade. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the westbound lane of Frontage Road between Sta. 6+50 and Sta. 10+00 has been properly prepared and has met project specifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/7/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 33B Sheet: 2 of 6 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 70°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, and observed the contractor excavating on the east side of East Lionshead Circle between Stations 3+50 and 4+00 to a depth of approximately 1'- 6". The material at the base of the excavation for the proposed crosspan was slightly silty sand with scattered cobbles. The base of the excavation was slightly moist and compacted. No organics or debris was observed. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the area has been properly prepared and has met project specifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/7/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 33C Sheet: 3 of 6 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Curb and Gutter Final Grade 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborato Field Depth Mauimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cfj (%) c� (%) 90 Retest of Test#87,dated 10/6/10 Grade± 142.5 5.6 135.9 4.1 95 Pass Proctar by Others G sum Pit-3/a"ABC 91 Curb and Gutter: South side of Frontage Grade± 142.5 5.6 136.2 3.9 96 Pass Proctor by Others Road at 200'East of Sta. 12+00 G sum Pit-'/4"ABC 92 Retest of Test#86,dated 10/6/10 Grade± 142.5 5.6 135.8 6.0 95 Pass Proctar by Others G sum Pit-3/a"ABC 93 Sta.2+50,West side of East Lionshead Grade± 142.5 5.6 1361 5.8 96 Pass Proctor by Others Cirde G sum Pit-'/a"ABC Weather: ❑ Sunn � Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 70°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of Modified Proctor ASTM D 1557, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2°/o of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Bobcat � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Vibe plate, 1-Jumping jack Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test curb and gutter final grade. Test results indicate that moisture and density tests performed at Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 6 inches the noted locations have met project specifications. Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck This report prosents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied o��the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moistu�e to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as belicved necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not tl�e sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecificatious. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/7/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 33D Sheet: 4 of 6 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 70°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): lvorth and South Drive-in/Drive-out walls Location of Observations: 80' West to Gridlines E.1/E-E.7 Sheet or Plan Number: 5200, 10/5212, and 11/5212 Meets Project Spec. South Drive-in/Drive-out Wall Rebar: 80' West to Gridlines E.1/E-E.7 yes no Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Horizontal: Size: #6 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-0" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. North Drive-in/Drive-out Wall Rebar: 80' West to Gridlines E-1/E-E.7 yes no Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Horizontal: Size: #6 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-0" � ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/7/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 33E Sheet: 5 of 6 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 70°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Cantilever wall(Tall)with Planter and South Cantilever Wall(Short)with Planter Location of Observations: North Drive-ii�/Drive-out Sheet or Plan Number: 5/5213 and 11/5213 Meets Project Spec. Cantilever Wall Tall with Planter Rebar: North Dnve-1n/Dr1ve-out yes no Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. outside face � ❑ Dowels: Size: #9 Spacing: 0'-6"o.c. inside face � ❑ Vertical: Size: #9 Spacing: 0'-6"o.c. inside face � ❑ Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. outside face � ❑ Horizontal: Size: #6 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-0" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. South Cantilever Wall(Short)with Planter Relj�T': NOTtIl�T1V2-Il]��P1V0-OUt yeS ri0 Dowels: Size: #6 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c. inside face � ❑ Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. outside face � ❑ Vertical: Size: #6 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c. inside face � ❑ Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. outside face � ❑ Horizontal: Size: #6 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-0" � ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/7/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 33F Sheet: 6 of 6 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 70°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): North and South Planter Walls of Drive-in/Drive-out Location of Observations: North Wall(Planter)—Drive-in/Drive-out Sheet or Plan Number: 5/5213 Meets Project Spec. North Planter Wall Rebar: Drive-u�/Drive-out yes no Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-6" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. South Planter Wall Rebar: Drive-in/Drive-out yes no Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-6" � ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/9/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 34A Sheet: 1 of 3 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Pipe Column Base 1309 Elkhorn Drive Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborato Field Depth Mauimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cfj (%) c� (%) 94 East Pipe Column Base Grade± 130.3 7.9 131.5 8.3 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 95 West Pipe Column Base Grade± 130.3 7.9 117.6 ll.9 90 Fail Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sunn � Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 50°F± ❑ Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 98%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99,+2%to � Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) -2%of Optimum Moisture Content 94 and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Tamping plate Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test pipe column base. Test results indicate that moisture and density tests performed at the noted Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: locations have failed to meet project specifications. Method of Adding Moisture: This report prosents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on the contractar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill duri��g times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as belicved necessary to calibrate our observer's'ud*ment Test data are not the sole basis for o inions on whether the till meets s ecifications. David Hasbrouck Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/9/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 34B Sheet: 2 of 3 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 50°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Wall and Grade Beam, and Footing Location of Observations: Level 1,Area C along Gridlines E-E and E-1 and Gridlines E F and E-1 Sheet or Plan Number: 5210, 5212, and 5202 Meets Project Spec. Wall Rebar: Gridlines E-E and E-1 yes no (Tau wau) Horizontal: Size: #6's Spacing: 1'-0"each face � ❑ �Tau wai��Vertical: Size: #5's Spacing: 1'-0"outside face � ❑ (Ta��wai�)Vertical: Size: #9's Spacing: 0'-6"inside face � ❑ (short wan) Vertical: Size: #6's Spacing: 1'-0"inside face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. Footing Rebar: Gridlines E F and E-1 yes no Horizontal: Size: 5 - #5's Spacing: Each way, single mat � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ David Hasbrouck Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/9/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 34C Sheet: 3 of 3 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 50°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Drive in/Drive out Beams Location of Observations: Level 1,Area C along Gridlines E-E and E-1 and Gridlines E F and E-1 Sheet or Plan Number: 8/5212 Meets Project Spec. Wall and Grade Beam Rebar: Gridlines E-E and E-1 yes no Horizontal: Size: 7 - #9 Spacing: Continuous top and bottom � ❑ Stirrups: Size: #4's Spacing: 0'-8" � ❑ Stirrups: Size: #5's Spacing: 0'-8" o.c. � ❑ Dowels: Size: #4's Spacing: 1'-0" � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ David Hasbrouck Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/10/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 35 Sheet: 1 of 1 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Obs�rvation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 West Pipe Column Base 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laboratory Field Depth Maximum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevafion Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) (pc� (%) (pc� (%) 96 Retest of Test#94,dated 10/9/10 Grade± 1303 7.9 119.2 9.5 91 Fail Curve#1 SAND Gravell Si] Weather: ❑ Sunn � Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 51°F± ❑ Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 98%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99,+2%to � Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) -2%of Optimum Moisture Content 96 and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: Tamping plate Progress Re,port: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test the west pipe column base. Test results indicate that moisture and density test performed at Number of Passes: Varies Thiekness of Lift: the noted]ocation has failed to meet project specifications. Method of Addin Moisture: This report presents opinions fonned as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on the conYract�or fo conYinue applying the recommended coinpacfive effort and inois[ure to tl�e fill duri��g times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's�ud menL Test data are no[the sole basis for o inions on whether the fiLl meets s ecificaYious. David Hasbrouck Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/ll/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 36A Sheet: 1 of 3 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 60°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, and observed the excavation in the ECO Building area along Gridlines A.0-C.0/8.0 with Brandon of FCI. Field engineer observed a trackhoe removing fill to a depth of approximately 10 feet in order to identify the elevation of natural soil. At the time of this observation, field engineer encountered native material at the same elevation from the southeast comer to the northeast corner of the proposed building. The fill present in these areas will need to be removed and compacted at 98 percent of the maximum standard Proctor density in the areas beneath all footings. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the excavation for the ECO Building area along Gridlines A.0-C.0/8.0 has not been properly prepared and has failed to meet project specifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/ll/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 36B Sheet: 2 of 3 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 60°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, to observe the material exposed in the exca�ation far the continuous footing along Gridlmes C.0/6.0-8.0 for the ECO Building. The excavation varied in depth from approximately 10.0 to 10.5 feet from the adjacent ground surface. The material exposed in the base of the excavation consisted of a natural, brown, moist, dense, slightly silty sand with scattered cobbles. Neither ponded water nor organic materials were observed in the base of the excavation. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the subgrade for the continuous footing along Gridlines C.0/6.0-8.0 for the ECO Building has been properly prepared and has met project specifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By ASPHALT COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/11/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 36C Sheet: 3 of 3 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Asphalt Compaction Tests Department of Public Works/Transpartation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Frontage Road 1309 Elkhorn Drivc South Side Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colarado Laborator Field Maximum Measured Corrected Percent Test Location Lift Theoretical Pass/Fail Asphalt Type No. No. Density Density Density Compaction �� (P�� (P��1 97 Sta. 11+50 ls` 154.4 145.1 145.1 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 98 Sta. 12+00 ls` 154.4 147.5 147.5 96 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 99 Sta. 12+50 15f 154.4 144.9 144.9 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 100 Sta. 13+00 ls` 154.4 145.6 145.6 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 60°F± � Asphalt Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction: 92%-96%of Maximum Theorerical Density ❑ Asphalt Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Breakdown, 1-Intermediate, 1-Finish roller � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Number of Passes: Varies Asphalt Temp: 280°F± Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested,to conduct density tests far the asphalt placed for the Frontage Road on the south side. Test results indicate that Thickness of Lift: 3 inches asphalt densities at the noted locations have met project specifications. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tha as'phalt. We have relied on the coutractor to con[inue applying the recommended compactive effort to the asphalt during times when our obse�ver is not observing operations. Tests are made of the asphalt only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's judgment. Test data arenot the sole basis for o inimis mi whether the as halt meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/12/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 37A Sheet: 1 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 50°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, and observed the contractor compacting the fmal grade for the pedestrian walkway retaining wall footings adjacent to the retaining wall on the west side of the existing parking structure at Gridlines E-B, E-B.4, E-B.8, E-C.3, E-D, and E-D.4. At the time of this observation, field engineer did not observe any soft or saturated soils at grade. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/12/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 37B Sheet: 2 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 50°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Footing Pads Location of Observations: Gridlines E-B, E-B.4, E-B.8, E-C.3, E-D, and E-D.4. Sheet or Plan Number: 5205 and 3/5205 Meets Project Spec. Footing Pads Rebar: Gridlines E B.4, E-B.8, E-C.3, E-D, and E-D.4. yes no Horizontal: Size: 3 - #5 Spacing: Continuous on each side � ❑ Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c.,through wall epoxied in � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: Gridlines E B yes no Horizontal: Size: 7 - #5 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c. continuous � ❑ Transversals: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By ASPHALT COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/13/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 38A Sheet: 1 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Asphalt Compaction Tests Department of Public Works/Transpartation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 East Lionshead Circle 1309 Elkhorn Drivc Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborator Field Ma�mum Measured Corrected Percent Test Location Lift Theoretical Pass/Fail Asphalt Type No. No. Density Density Density Compacfion �� (t��� (P�� 101 Sta. 1+00,5'Right of centerline ls` 154.4 143.2 143.2 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 102 Sta.2+00, 10'Left of centerline 15` 154.4 142.4 142.4 92 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 103 Sta.3+00, 15'Right of centerline ls` 154.4 143.7 143.7 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 104 Sta.4+00,Center ls` 154.4 143.6 143.6 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 105 Sta.0+50,Center 2"d 154.4 142.9 142.9 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 106 Sta. 1+50, 10'Left of centerline 2"a 154.4 144.0 144.0 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 107 Sta.3+50, 15'Right of centerline 2°d 154.4 142.1 142.1 92 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 60°F± � Asphalt Tested Meets Speci6cations. Specification Compaction: 92%-96%of Maximum Theoretical Density ❑ Asphalt Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Breakdown/Intermediate, 1-Finish roller � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Number of Passes: Varies Asphalt Temp: 260°F± Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested,to conduct density tests far the asphalt placed for East Lionshead Circle and Frontage Road. Test results Thickness of Lift: 2.5 inches indicate that asphalt densities at the noted locations have met project specifications. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the asphalt. We havc relied on the contractar to continue applying dte recommended compactive effort to the asphalt during times when our obse�ver is not observing operations. Tests are made of the asphalt only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's judgment. Test data are not the sole basis for o inimis mi whether the as halt meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By ASPHALT COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/13/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 38B Sheet: 2 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Asphalt Compaction Tests Department of Public Works/Transpartation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Frontage Road 1309 Elkhorn Drivc Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborator Field Ma�mum Measured Corrected Percent Test Location Lift Theoretical Pass/Fail Asphalt Type No. No. Density Density Density Compacfion �� (t��� (P�� 108 Sta.0+50, 10'Right of centerline ls` 154.4 145.1 145.1 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 109 Sta.2+50,20'Right of centerline ls` 154.4 144.4 144.4 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 110 Sta.4+50,2'Right of centerline ls` 154.4 143.5 143.5 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 111 Sta.6+50,5'Right of centerline ls` 154.4 144.6 144.6 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 112 Sta. 8+50,25'Right of centerline ls` 154.4 145.4 145.4 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 113 Sta. 10+50, 10'Right of centerline ls` 154.4 144.0 144.0 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 ll4 Sta. 12+00, 15'Right of centerline ls` 154.4 143.8 143.8 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP MiY ID 532 Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 60°F± � Asphalt Tested Meets Speci6cations. Specification Compaction: 92%-96%of Maximum Theoretical Density ❑ Asphalt Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Breakdown/Intermediate, 1-Finish roller � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Number of Passes: Varies Asphalt Temp: 268°F± Progress Report: See Sheet 1 of 2. Thickness of Lift: 2.5 inches This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the as�halt. We have relied on the contractar to continue applying dte recommended compactive effort to the asphalt during times when our obse�ver is not observing operations. Tests are made of fhe asphait only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer'sjudgment Test data are not the sole basis for o inimis mi whether the as halt meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By ASPHALT COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/14/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 39A Sheet: 1 of 4 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Asphalt Compaction Tests Department of Public Works/Transpartation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 East Lionshead Circle and Frontage Road 1309 Elkhorn Drivc Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborator Field Ma�mum Measured Corrected Percent Test Location Lift Theoretical Pass/Fail Asphalt Type No. No. Density Density Density Compacfion �� (t��� (P�� 115 East Lionshead Circle: Sta. 1+50, 10'Right of Final 154.4 146.6 146.6 95 Pass SX w/20%RAP centerline Mix ID 532 ll6 East Lionshead Circle: Sta.4+00,5'Right of Final 154.4 144.0 144.0 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP centerline Mix ID 532 117 East Lionshead Circle: Sta.2+00, 15'Left of Final 154.4 143.6 143.6 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP centerline Mix ID 532 ll 8 East Lionshead Circle: Sta.4+50,2'Left of Final 154.4 142.2 142.2 92 Pass SX w/20%RAP centerline Mix ID 532 119 Frontage Road: Sta.0+50,20'Left of centerline ls` 154.4 145.1 145.1 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 120 Frontage Road: Sta.2+50,5'Left of centerline ls` 154.4 142.9 142.9 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 121 Frontage Road: Sta.5+00, 10'Left of centerline ls` 154.4 145.7 145.7 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 70°F± � Asphalt Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction: 92%-96%of Maximum Theoretical Density ❑ Asphalt Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Breakdown, 1-Intermediate, 1-Finish roller � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Obs ervation. � Part Time Observation. Number of Passes: Varies Asphalt Temp: 270°F± Progress Report: Kevin with Town of Vail informed field engineer he is not satisfied with the depth of asphalt on eastbound lane of Frontage Road. He has directed Thickness of Lift: 2 inches contractor to mill from Sta. 11+�5 to Sta. 12+00 and replace. Test results indicate that asphalt densities at the noted locations have met project specifications. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the asphalt We have relied on the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort to the asphalt duriug times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the asphalt only as believed necessary to calibrate our observar's judgment. Test data are not the sole basis fm�o inions on whether the as halt meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By ASPHALT COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/14/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 39B Sheet: 2 of 4 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Asphalt Compaction Tests Department of Public Works/Transpartation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Frontage Road 1309 Elkhorn Drivc Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborator Field Ma�mum Measured Corrected Percent Test Location Lift Theoretical Pass/Fail Asphalt Type No. No. Density Density Density Compacfion �� (t��� (P�� 122 Sta.7+00,3'Left of centerline ls` 154.4 142.9 142.9 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 123 Sta.9+00, 10'Left of centerline ls` 154.4 144.8 144.8 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 124 Sta. 11+00, 15'Left of centerline ls` 154.4 146.0 146.0 95 Pass SX w/20%RAP MiY ID 532 125 Sta.0+05,5'Right of centerline 2"a 154.4 142.9 142.9 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 126 Sta.2+00, 15'Right of centerline 2"d 154.4 143.7 143.7 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP M�ID 532 127 Sta.4+00,20'Right of centerline 2"a 154.4 145.2 145.2 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 128 Sta.6+00,22'Right of centerline 2°d 154.4 144.0 144.0 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 70°F± � Asphalt Tested Meets Speci6cations. Specification Compaction: 92%-96%of Maximum Theoretical Density ❑ Asphalt Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Breakdown, 1-Intermediate, 1-Finish roller � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Number of Passes: Varies Asphalt Temp: 270°F± Progress Report: See Sheet 1 of 4. Thickness of Lift: 2 inches This reporT presents opinions fonned as a resulT of our observations and/or compaction testing of the aspl�alt. We have relied on the contractar to continue applying dte recommended compactive effort to the asphalt during times when our obseiver is not observing operations. Tests are made of the asphalt only as beiieved necessary to calibrate our observer'sjudgment. Test data are not the sole basis for o inimis mi whether the as halt meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By ASPHALT COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/14/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 39C Sheet: 3 of 4 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Asphalt Compaction Tests Department of Public Works/Transpartation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Frontage Road 1309 Elkhorn Drivc Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborator Field Ma�mum Measured Corrected Percent Test Location Lift Theoretical Pass/Fail Asphalt Type No. No. Density Density Density Compacfion �� (t��� (P�� 129 Sta. 8+00,6'Right of centerline 2°d 154.4 144.7 144.7 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 130 Sta. 10+00, 15'Right of centerline 2"a 154.4 1431 143.1 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 131 Sta. ll+95,20'Right of centerline 2°d 154.4 143.8 143.8 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 70°F± � Asphalt Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction: 92%-96%of Maximum Theoretical Density ❑ Asphalt Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Breakdown, 1-Intermediate, 1-Finish roller � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Number of Passes: Varies Asphalt Temp: 270°F± Progress Report: See Sheet 1 of 4. Thickness of Lift: 2 inches This reporT presents opinions fonned as a resulT of our observations and/or compaction testing of the aspl�alt. We have relied on the contractar to continue applying dte recommended compactive effort to the asphalt during times when our obseiver is not observing operations. Tests are made of the asphalt only as beiieved necessary to calibrate our observer'sjudgment. Test data are not the sole basis for o inimis mi whether the as halt meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/14/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 39D Sheet: 4 of 4 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 70°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Drive-in/Drive-out Bridge Location of Observations: Between North and South Drive-ii�/Drive-out Walls at Gridlines E-1 Sheet or Plan Number: 5200 and 6/5212 Meets Project Spec. �T1Ve-11��P1V0-OUt BT1Clg0 Reba2': Between North and South Drive-in/Drive-out Walls at Gridlines E-1 yeS ri0 Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Transverse: Size: #6 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. (bottom) � ❑ Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. (top) � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-0" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/15/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 40A Sheet: 1 of 1 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 50°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Engineer arrived on site, as requested, to observe the material exposed in the excavation for the proposed ECO Building and verify the depth to native materiaL At the time of our observation, the excavation was approximately 15 to 18 feet in depth from the adjacent street level elevation. Exposed soils consisted of existing fill to an approximate depth of 15 to 17 feet followed by native soil to the maximum depth excavated of 18 feet. Tl�e existing fill consists of black,brown,tan,moist,medium dense to dense, silty sand with cobbles, boulders, organics, and deleterious materials. The native soil consists ofpink,brown, moist, dense, slightly silty, sand and gravel with scattered cobbles and boulders. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the foundation excavation at the base of the existing north wall of the parking garage is bearing on the native, slightly silty, sand and gravel with scattered cobbles and boulders. The remainder of the footing excavations for the proposed ECO Building needs to be excavated past the existing fill and extend into the native slightly silty, sand and gravel with scattered cobbles and boulders. Katie Shaw Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/15/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 40B Sheet: 2 of 3 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Obs�rvation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Sidewalk Final Grade 1309 Elkhorn Drive Information Booth Pull-in/Pull-out Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 132 Sta. 11+'75 Grade± 142.5 5.6 137.2 4.9 96 Pass Proctor by Others G sum Pit-3/a"ABC Weather: � Sum� ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 70°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of Modified Proctor ASTM D 1557, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Loader � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Vibe plate Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test sidewalk final grade for the information booth pull-in/pull-out. Test results indicate that Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 6 inches the moisture and density test perforined at the noted location has met project Method of Adding Moisture: Hose specifications. Tl�is re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit. We have relied on the contractor to continue applying the recommended co�npactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecificatio�s. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By ASPHALT COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/15/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 40C Sheet: 3 of 3 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Asphalt Compaction Tests Department of Public Works/Transpartation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Frontage Road 1309 Elkhorn Drivc Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborator Field Ma�mum Measured Corrected Percent Test Location Lift Theoretical Pass/Fail Asphalt Type No. No. Density Density Density Compacfion �� (t��� (P�� 133 Sta.0+25,5'Left of centerline 2°d 154.4 145.3 145.3 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 134 Sta.2+25, 10'Left of centerline 2"a 154.4 144.0 144.0 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 135 Sta.4+50, 15'Left of centerline 2°d 154.4 143.7 143.7 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP MiY ID 532 136 Sta.6+50,20'Left of centerline 2"a 154.4 142.2 142.2 92 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 137 Sta. 8+50,Center 2"d 154.4 145.9 145.9 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 138 Sta. 10+00,2'Left of centerline 2"a 154.4 145.3 145.3 94 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 139 Sta. I 1+50, 12'Left of centerline 2°d 154.4 144.2 144.2 93 Pass SX w/20%RAP Mix ID 532 Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 70°F± � Asphalt Tested Meets Speci6cations. Specification Compaction: 92%-96%of Maximum Theoretical Density ❑ Asphalt Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Breakdown, 1-Intermediate, 1-Finish roller � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Number of Passes: Varies Asphalt Temp: 285°F± Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested,to conduct density tests for the asphalt placed for Frontage Road. Field engineer observed intermittent Thickness of Lift: 2 inches longitudinal cracking along the south edge of Frontage Road between approximately Sta. 0+00 and Sta. 5+50. Contractor was informed by Kevin with the Town of Vail. Test This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the asphalt. We have relied IOSUItS 111CI]GatO t17at SSpllalt C10riS1t1eS at t110 170teC� IOC2t10riS �laVO 1110t pT"0�0Ct on the contractar to continue applying dte recommended compactive effort to the asphalt during[imes when our obse�ver is not S�70C1f1Cat10riS. observing operations. Tests are made of the asphalt o nly as believed necessary to calibrate our observer'sjudgment. Test data are not the sole basis for o inimis mi whether the as halt meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/18/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 41A Sheet: 1 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Obs�rvation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Sidewalk Final Grade 1309 Elkhorn Drive Frontage Road Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 140 Sta.6+50 Grade± 130.3 7.9 130.1 6.2 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 141 Sta.7+00 Grade± 130.3 7.9 129.8 6.5 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 142 Sta. 11+25 Grade± 130.3 7.9 130.9 5.9 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sum� � Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 58°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 100%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99,+2% ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) to-2°/o of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Loader � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Vibe plate Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test tl�e sidewalk final grade along the Frontage Road. Test results indicate that moisture and Number of Passes: Varies Thiekness of Lift: 6 inches density tests performed at the noted locations have met project specifications. Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck Tl�is re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit. We have relied on the contractor to continue applying the recommended co�npactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecificatio�s. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/18/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 41B Sheet: 2 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 58°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Retaining Wall Location of Observations: Gridlines E A.5 to E-B/E.1 Sheet or Plan Number: 11/5211 and 12/5211 Meets Project Spec. Retaining Wall Rebar: Gridlines E A.5 to E-BB.l yes no Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: Gridlines yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: The drilled dowels for the horizontals were measured at 7.5" to 1'-0" o.c. yes no each face. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) noted in this � ❑ Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/19/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 42A Sheet: 1 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 65°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, to observe the sidewalk subgrade adjacent to the bus pull-in from Sta. 7+25 to Sta. 8+25. The material exposed in the subgrade consisted of a slightly silty sand with some scattered cobbles. The subgrade was free of organics and debris. The material exposed at the sidewalk grade was dense. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the subgrade adjacent to the bus pull-in from Sta. 7+25 to Sta. 8+25 has been properly prepared and has met project specifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/19/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 42B Sheet: 2 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Lakewood—(303)989-1223 General Backfill from Northwest Corner of 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 North Drive-in/Drive-out Wall Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 143 10'North -2.0± 130.3 7.9 129.7 6.4 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 144 2'West and 20'North -1.0-�- 130.3 7.9 130.0 6.2 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sum� ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 70°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 100%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99,+2% ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) to-2°/o of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Loader, 1-Trackhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 2-Walk-behind Wackers Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test general backfill from northwest corner of north drive-in/drive-out wall. Test results indicate that Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches moisture and density tests performed at the noted locations have met project Method of Adding Moisture: N/A specifications. Tl�is re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit. We have relied on the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment Test data are not the sole basis for o inio��s on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/20/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 43A Sheet: 1 of 3 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 74°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, to observe the material exposed in the exca�ation for the continuous footings 14'-4"West of Gridlines A.0-C.0/1.0-8.5 for the Eco Building. The excavation varied in depth from approximately 15 feet to 18 feet from the adjacent ground surface. The material exposed in the base of the excavation consisted of a natural, pink to light brown, moist, dense, gravelly sand with scattered cobbles. Neither ponded water mr organic materials were observed in the base of the excavation. The excavated fill was taken off site and put through a 6-inch screen. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the subgrade for the continuous footings 14'-4"West of Gridlines A.0- C.0/1.0-8.5 for the Eco Building has been properly prepared and has met project specifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/20/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 43B Sheet: 2 of 3 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Departmcnt of Public Works/Transportation Lakcwood-(303)989-1223 General Backfill for North Drive-in/Drive- 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand 7unction-(970)241-7700 out Wall and Sidewalk Final Grade for Vail,Colorado 81657 Frontage Road Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 145 Backfill: Fro�n northwest corner of wall, 10' -5.0± 130.3 7.9 124.7 7.0 96 Pass Curve#1 North and 10' East SAND Gravell Sil 146 Backfill: From northwest carner of wall, 15' -4.0-�- 130.3 7.9 126.8 6.5 97 Pass Curve#1 North and 5' East SAND Gravell Sil 147 Backfill: Fro�n northwest corner of wall,20' -3.0± 130.3 7.9 127.2 6.1 98 Pass Curve#1 North and 0' East SAND Gravell Sil 148 Backfill: From northwest corner of wall,2' -10.0± 130.3 7.9 1281 6.0 98 Pass Curve#1 North and 30' East SAND Gravell Sil 149 Backfill: Fro�n northwest corner of wall, 10' -20.0± 130.3 7.9 126.2 6.3 97 Pass Curve#1 North and 50' East SAND Gravell Sil 150 Backfill: From northwest carner of wall, 15' -25.0± 130.3 7.9 124.0 7.2 95 Pass Curve#1 North and 60' East SAND Gravell Sil 151 Sidewalk: Sta.7+50 Grade± 142.5 5.6 136.5 5.2 96 Pass Proctor by Others G sum Pit-3/4"ABC Weather: � Sum� ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 71°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99 ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) (sidewalk: 95%of Modified Proctor ASTM D 1557),+2%to-2%of Oprimum Moisture and Should be Removed or Reworked, Content Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Tracichoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test general backfill for north drive-in/drive-out wall and sidewallc�nal grade for Frontage Road. Test Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 to 12 inches results indicate that moisture and density tests performed at the noted locations have met Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck project specifications. This report prescnts opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on the coi�trac[ar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and�noisture to the fill during times when our observer is not obscrving operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i��ions on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/20/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 43C Sheet: 3 of 3 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: °F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Bridge Slab Location of Observations: Gridlines E 1 to E-4/Pedestrian Bridge Sheet or Plan Number: 4/5210 Meets Project Spec. Bridge Slab Rebar: Gridlines E 1 to E-4/Pedestrian Bridge yes no Horizontal: Size: #6 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c. each way, top and bottom � ❑ Horizontal: Size: 1 - #4 Spacing: Continuous each side � ❑ Horizontal: Size: 1 - #4 Spacing: Continuous additional each side � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-6" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/21/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 44A Sheet: 1 of 5 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 General Backfill 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborato Field Depth Mauimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cfj (%) c� (%) 152 From northwest carner of north drive- -15.0± 130.3 7.9 126.0 7.1 97 Pass Curve#1 in/drive-out wall: I S'North and 50'East SAND Gravell Sil 153 From narthwest corner of north drive- -17.0± 130.3 7.9 124.9 7.8 96 Pass Curve#1 in/drive-out wall: 5'North and 60' East SAND Gravell Sil 154 From northwest corner of north drive- -19.0± 130.3 7.9 124.1 8.4 95 Pass Curve#1 in/drive-out wall: 10'North and 75'East SAND Gravell Sil 155 From narthwest corner of north drive- -18.0± 130.3 7.9 125.6 7.3 96 Pass Curve#1 in/drive-out wall: 15'North and 70'East SAND Gravell Sil 156 From northwest corner of north drive- -17.0± 130.3 7.9 126.2 6.9 97 Pass Curve#1 in/drive-out wall: 5'North and 65'Eas1 SAND Gravell Sil 157 From narthwest corner of north drive- -15.0± 130.3 7.9 125.8 7.2 97 Pass Curve#1 in/drive-out wall: 12'North and 60'East SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sunn � Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 58°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99,+2°/o to ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) -2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test general backfill. Test results indicate that moisture and density tests performed at the noted Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 to 12 inches locations have met project speci�cations. Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck This report prosents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on tl�e contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to tlie fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as beli�ved necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o inions o n whether the fill meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/21/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 44B Sheet: 2 of 5 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Structural Fill Below Foundarions 1309 Elkhorn Drive ECO Building Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 158 Gridlines A.5/6.1 -17.0± 130.3 7.9 129.3 6.2 99 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 159 Gridlines B.0/3.3 -16.0± 130.3 7.9 1301 5.9 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 160 Gridlines C.0/4.0 -16.0± 130.3 7.9 127.9 6.5 98 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 161 Gridlines B.5/1.5 -15.0± 130.3 7.9 128.4 6.1 99 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 162 Gridlines A.9/5.0 -14.0± 130.3 7.9 129.0 6.3 99 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sum� � Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 59°F± � Fill TestedMeets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 98%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99,+2%to ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) -2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test the structural fill being placed below the proposed ECO Building. Test results indicate that Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 to 12 inches moisture and density tests performed at the noted locations have met project Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck specifications. Tl�is re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit. We have relied on the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moistwe to the 6ll during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's'ud ment Test d ata are not the sole basis for o inions o��whether the fil I meets s ecificatio�s. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/21/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 44C Sheet: 3 of 5 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 63°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Grade Beams Location of Observations: Level 2 Upper Landing, Southwest Corner of Parking Structure Sheet or Plan Number: 12/5213 and 9/5215 Meets Project Spec. Grade Beam Rebal': Level 2 Upper Landing, Southwest Corner of Parking StrucYure yeS n0 Horizontal: Size: 6 - #8 Spacing: Top and bottom continuous � ❑ Horizontal: Size: 2 - #4 Spacing: Each side � ❑ Stirrups: Size: #3 Spacing: 0'-5" o.c. � ❑ Standard hook: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Grade Beam Rebal': Level 2 Upper Landing,Southwest Corner of Parking Structure yeS n0 Horizontal: Size: 4 - #5 Spacing: Top and bottom ❑ � Dowels: Size: 2 rows 3 - Spacing: 0'-4" o.c. � ❑ #5 Horizontal: Size: 2 - #4 Spacing: Each side � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: � ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. ❑ � Mike Brath Scott B. Myers,P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/21/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 44D Sheet: 4 of 5 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 63°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Wall and Structural Slab Location of Observations: Level 2 Upper Landing, Southwest Corner of Parking Structure Sheet or Plan Number: 3/5213, 9/5312, 1/5201, and 10/5212 Meets Project Spec. Wa]I Rebal': Leve12 Upper Landing, Southwest Corner of Parking Structure yeS n0 Epoxied Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0"each face � ❑ Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0"each face � ❑ Dowels: Size: #4 Spacing: 3' x 3' at 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Horizontal: Size: #4 Spacing. Continuous at comer of dowels � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. StCL1CtLiTa1 Slab RebaT: Leve12 Upper Landing,Southwest Corner of Parking Structure yes no HOYIZOntal: slze: �#5 Spacing: 0'-9"o.c. epoxy each way top and bottom � ❑ Dowel: Size: #5 Spacing: 2'-0"o.c. with standard hook � ❑ Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. bottom each way � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/21/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 44E Sheet: 5 of 5 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 63°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Columns Location of Observations: Northwest and Northeast Stairs Between 2°`�and 3rd Levels of Parking Structure Sheet or Plan Number: RFI 86 10/5215 and 12/5214 RFI 30 Meets Project Spec. Relj�: Northwest and Northeast Stairs Between 2°d and 3`d Levels of Parking yeS ri0 COI1111111S Structure Ties: Size: 3 - #3 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Vertical: Size: 10 - #7 Spacing: Evenly spaced � ❑ Stirrups: Size: 2 - #3 Spacing: Top and bottom at 0'-3" o.c. � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-0" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/22/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 45A Sheet: 1 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 General Backfill 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado 81657 Vail,Colorado Laborato Field Depth Mauimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cfj (%) c� (%) 163 From northwest corner of north drive- -13.0± 130.3 7.9 123.9 7.4 95 Pass Curve#1 in/drive-out wall: 10'North and 65' Eas1 SAND Gravell Sil 164 From narthwest corner of north drive- -11.0± 130.3 7.9 125.7 6.3 96 Pass Curve#1 in/drive-out wall: 15'North and 55' East SAND Gravell Sil 165 From northwest corner of north drive- -5.0± 130.3 7.9 124.3 7.1 95 Pass Curve#1 in/drive-out wall: 5'North and 20'East SAND Gravell Sil 166 From narthwest corner of north drive- -3.0± 130.3 7.9 126.2 6.0 97 Pass Curve#1 in/drive-out wall: 10'North and 10'East SAND Gravell Sil 167 From northwest corner of north drive- -10.0± 130.3 7.9 125.0 6.7 96 Pass Curve#1 in/drive-out wall: 7'North and 75'East SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sunn � Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 47°F± � Fill TestedMeets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99,+2°/o to ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) -2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test general backfill. Test results indicate that moisture and density tests performed at the noted Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 to 12 inches locations have met project speci�cations. Method of Adding Moisture: N/A This report prosents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on the contractar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill duri��g times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as belicved necessary to calibrate our observer's'ud*ment Test data are not the sole basis for o inions on whether the till meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 10/22/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 45B Sheet: 2 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Structural Fill Below Foundarions 1309 Elkhorn Drive ECO Building Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 168 Gridlines B.7/2.0 -13.0± 130.3 7.9 127.7 7.3 98 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 169 Gridlines C.0/4.5 -12.0± 130.3 7.9 129.0 6.5 99 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 170 Gridlines A.8/3.0 -11.0± 130.3 7.9 128.4 7.0 99 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 171 Gridlines B.9/5.5 -10.0± 130.3 7.9 129.5 6.2 99 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sum� � Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 50°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 98%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99,+2°/o to ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) -2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test the structural fill being placed below the proposed ECO Building. Test results indicate that Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches moisture and density tests performed at the noted locations have met project Method of Adding Moisture: N/A specifications. Tl�is re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit. We have relied on the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment Test data are not the sole basis for o inio��s on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By