The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-039 Daily Field Reports 49 to 51 REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: ll/1/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 49A Sheet: 1 of 3 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 45°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, to observe the material exposed in the excavation for the continuous footing for the ECO Building along Gridline C.O, 14'-4" West of Gridlines 1.0 to 8.0. The excavation varied in depth from approximately 15 to 18 feet from the adjacent ground surface. The material exposed in the base of the excavation consisted of a natural pink to light brown,moist, dense, gravelly sand with some scattered cobbles. Neither ponded water nor organic materials were observed in the base of the excavation. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the subgrade for the continuous footing for the ECO Building along Gridline C.O, 14'-4"West of Gridlines 1.0 to 8.0 has been properly prepared and has met project specifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: ll/1/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 49B Sheet: 2 of 3 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 45°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, to observe the material exposed in the exca�ation for the continuous footing along Gridlines E-B to E-E, 15' West of E-1. The exca�ation varied in depth from approximately 6 to 18 inches from the adjacent ground surface. The material exposed in the base of the excavation consisted of a tan, brown, moist, dense, slightly silty sand with scattered cobbles. Neither ponded water nor organic materials were observed in the base of the excavation. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the subgrade for the continuous footing along Gridlines E B to E-E, 15' West of E-1 has been properly prepared and has met project specifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: ll/1/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 49C Sheet: 3 of 3 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 48°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Heated Topping Slab Location of Observations: Pedestrian Bridge, Area B Sheet or Plan Number: 4/5210 Meets Project Spec. Heated Topping Slab Rebar: Pedestrian Bridge,Area B yes no Horizontal: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-6"o.c., each way, epoxy coated � ❑ Horizontal: Size: #4 Spacing: Continuous each side � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-0" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: ll/2/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: SOA Sheet: 1 of 4 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Footing Final Grade 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Eco Building Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 184 Gridlines A.5/3.2 Grade± 130.3 7.9 130.4 6.8 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 185 Gridlines A.9/6.1 Grade± 130.3 7.9 128.0 7.1 98 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 186 Gridline A.3/14'-4"West of Gridline 1.0 Grade± 130.3 7.9 131.3 6.2 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sum� ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 50°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 98%of Standard Proctor AASHTO T 99,+2°/o to ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) -2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test footing final grade for the Eco Building. Test results indicate that moisture and density tests Number of Passes: Varies Thiekness of Lift: 8 to 12 inches performed at the noted locarions have met project specificarions. Method of Adding Moisture: N/A Tl�is re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit. We have relied on the contractor to continue applying the recommended co�npactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecificatio�s. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: ll/2/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: SOB Sheet: 2 of 4 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Subgrade 1309 Elkhorn Drive Curb and Gutter Drive-in/Drive-out Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 187 From northwest corner of south wall, Grade± 142.5 5.6 137.0 5.0 d96 Pass Proctor by Others 1'North and 40' East G sum Pit-3/4"ABC 188 From southwest corner of north wall, Grade± 142.5 5.6 1361 5.9 96 Pass Proctor by Others 1' South and 30'East G sum Pit-3/4"ABC 189 East side of Island—Center Grade± 142.5 5.6 136.8 5.2 96 Pass Proctor by Others G sum Pit-3/a"ABC Weather: ❑ Sum� ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : °F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of ModifiedProctor ASTM D 1557,+2%to ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) -2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Loader � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Wacker Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test tl�e base course for the curb and gutter drive-in/drive-out. Test results indicate that moisture Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches and density tests performed at the noted locations have met project specifications. Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck Tl�is re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit. We have relied on the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment Test data are not the sole basis for o inio��s on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 11/2/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: SOC Sheet: 3 of 4 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 50°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Continuous Footing Location of Observations: Gridlines C.0/6.1-8.1, C.0/14'-0"west of 1.0 to 2.8, and C.0/3.5-6.1 Sheet or Plan Number: 3/S 120 and 3/S 121 Meets Project Spec. Continuous Footing Rebar: Gridlines C.0/6.1-8.1 yes no Horizontal: Size: 4 - #5 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Transversals: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-4" o.c. outside face � ❑ Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c. inside face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-10" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: Gridlines C.0/14'-0"west of 1.0 to 2.8, and C.0/3.5-6.1 yes no Horizontal: Size: 5 - #5 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Transversals: Size: #5 Spacing: At bottom, 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Dowels: Size: #7 Spacing: 1'-0" outside face � ❑ Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0"inside face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-0" � ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 11/2/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: SOD Sheet: 4 of 4 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 50°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Continuous Footing Location of Observations: Gridlines C.0/2.8-3.5 Sheet or Plan Number: 6/S 120 Meets Project Spec. Continuous Footing Rebar: Gridlines C.0/2.8-3.5 yes no Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c. each way � ❑ Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. each face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-8" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: Gridlines yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: ll/3/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 51 Sheet: 1 of 1 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: °F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Spandrel Beam for Eco Bridge Location of Observations: Gridlines E A/E-10.6 to E-10.9 Sheet or Plan Number: 10/S 121 Meets Project Spec. Spandrel Beam for Eco Bridge Rebar: Gridlines E A/E-10.6 to E-10.9 yes no Dowels: Size: 2 - #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. top and bottom � ❑ Horizontal: Size: 2 - #7 Spacing. Continuous top and bottom � ❑ Horizontal: Size: 3 - #5 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Ties: Size: #4 Spacing: 0'-6" altemate hook direction � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By