The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-039 Daily Field Reports 74 to 79 SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/8/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 74A Sheet: 1 of 3 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood-(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction-(970)241-7700 Interior and Exterior Slab-on-grade and 1309 Elkhorn Drive Foundation Wall Fill Vail,Colorado 81657 ECO Building Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado Laborato Field Depth Maximum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) c� (%) c� (%) 221 Gridlines A.9/1.9 -6.5± 130.3 7.9 131.3 8.3 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 222 9'North of Gridlines A.0/1.0 -6.5± 130.3 7.9 127.2 10.3 98 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 223 Gridlines A.8/5.4 -13.0± 130.3 7.9 132.5 8.1 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 224 Gridlines A.4/3.7 -13.0± 130.3 7.9 131.8 9.1 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 225 8'North of Gridlines A.0/4.5 -13.0± 130.3 7.9 132.5 7.9 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil 226 Gridlines A.7/3.6 -12.0± 131.1 7.7 126.0 8.0 96 Pass Ciuve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 227 5'North of Gridlines A.0/7.1 -13.5± 130.3 7.9 132.8 8.4 100 Pass Curve#1 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 17°-30°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of Standard Proctor ASTM D 698, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 2-Tracichoes, 1-Bobcat � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind, 1-Jumping jack Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test fill for the interior and exterior slab-on-grade and foundation wall for the ECO Building. Test Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches results indicate that moisture and density tests performed at the noted locations have met Method of Adding Moisture: None/Water truck for import project specifications. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or com�action testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on the coi�trac[ar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and�noisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i��ions on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/8/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 74B Sheet: 2 of 3 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood-(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction-(970)241-7700 Interior and Extcrior Slab-on-grade and 1309 Elkhorn Drive Exterior Foundation Wall Fill Vail,Colorado 81657 ECO Building Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colarado Laborato Field Depth Maximum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) c� (%) c� (%) 228 Gridlines A.6/5.4 -ll.5± 131.1 7.7 132.8 9.2 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 229 Gridlines B.5/3.0 -12.5± 131.1 7.7 128.3 10.3 98 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 230 7'North of Gridlines A.0/5.7 -11.5± 131.1 7.7 132.9 7.9 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 231 Gridlines A.3/5.5 -11.0± 131.1 7.7 129.7 9.1 99 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 232 Gridlines A.6/4.1 -10.5± 131.1 7.7 133.9 7.7 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 233 Gridlines A.6/2.6 -6.0± 131.1 7.7 131.8 8.4 100 Pass Ciuve#2 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sunn ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : °F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of Standard Proctor ASTM D 698, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 2-Tracichoes, 1-Bobcat � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind, 1-Jumping jack Progress Report: See Sheet 1 of 3. Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck and hose assembly This report�resents opinions fonned as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on the coi�trac[ar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and�noisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i��ions on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/8/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 74C Sheet: 3 of 3 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 43°F± in enclosed area Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): 2"`�to 3rd Level Stairs Location of Observations: Gridlines E 1 to E-1.4, �A to E-A.2 Sheet or Plan Number: 5201, 1/5215, 2/5215, and 4/5215 Meets Project Spec. 2"d to 3rd Level Stairs Rebar: Gridlines E-1 to E-1.4, E-A to E-A.2 yes no Top and bottom: Size: #6 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c. north to south � ❑ Top and bottom: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. east to west � ❑ Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 0'-8" o.c. top and bottom for landing � ❑ Top and bottom: Size: #6 Spacing: 0'-8" east to west � ❑ Top and bottom: Size: #6 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c. north to south � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-11.5"North to Sou�h at Landing � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/9/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 75A Sheet: 1 of 4 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 29° - 36°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer arrived on site, as requested, to observe 3/4 inch rock placed against the foundation wall between Gridlines B-GO-8 and E-A/E-9.8 to E-13 (S 101). The contractor was in the process of placing approximately 11 feet of 3/4 inch rock in the area. The first lift was approximately 1.5 feet. Field engineer informed fi�e contractor to place approximately 8 inch lifts unless a bigger tamping plate was used. The 3/4 inch rocic below the electrical conduits were placed and compacted to approximately 28 inches from the bottom of the conduits. The remainder of the space will have loose 3/a inch rock, as it is not accessible by tamping plate. Some flowfill will be placed, according to the contractar. The 3/4 inch rock that was compacted was medium dense. Field engineer observed rock placement to a depth of approximately 5 feet. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/9/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 75B Sheet: 2 of 4 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood-(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction-(970)241-7700 Interiar Slab-on-grade and Grade Beam Fill 1309 Elkhorn Drive ECO Building Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 234 Gridlines A.6/2.0(grade beam) -2.5± 131.1 7.7 132.7 7.4 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 235 Gridlines A.3/1.0(grade beam) -2.0-E- 131.1 7.7 124.0 9.6 95 Fail Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 236 Gridlines A.0/0.5(grade beam) Grade± 131.1 7.7 1331 8.3 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 237 Retest of Test#235(grade beam) -2.0-E- 131.1 7.7 131.4 7.9 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 238 Gridlines A.9/2.0(grade beam) -2.0± 131.1 7.7 133.3 6.5 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 239 Gridlines A.9/1.0(grade beam) -1.5-f- 131.1 7.7 134.3 8.5 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 240 Gridlines A.4/0.7(slab-on-grade) -2.0± 131.1 7.7 126.7 8.3 97 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sum� ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : °F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%(slab-on-grade)or 98%(grade beams)of ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) Standard Proctor ASTM D 698,+2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Tracichoe, 1-Bobcat � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Jumping jack, 1-Walk-behind Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test fill for the interior slab-on-grade and grade beams for the ECO Building. Test results indicate that Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches moisture and density tests performed at the noted locations have met project Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck and hose assembly specifications. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our obseivations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied m�the contractar to continue applying the recommended compactive effbrt and moisture to the fill duri�g times wl�en our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i�ions on whether the fill meets s ecificatio�s. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/9/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 75C Sheet: 3 of 4 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Interiar Slab-on-grade and Grade Beam Fill 1309 Elkhorn Drive ECO Building Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 241 Gridlines A.6/5.7(slab-on-grade) -9.5± 131.1 7.7 126.1 9.7 96 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 242 Gridlines A.4/3.7(slab-on-grade) -9.0-�- 131.1 7.7 124.6 101 95 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 243 Gridlines A.5/4.6(slab-on-grade) -8.0± 131.1 7.7 130.0 7.6 99 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 244 Gridlines B.0/4.0(grade beam) -8.0-�- 131.1 7.7 129.2 7.8 99 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 245 Gridlines A.8/2A(grade beam) Grade± 131.1 7.7 133.8 7.3 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 246 Gridlines A.6/1.0(grade beam) Grade± 131.1 7.7 134.9 6.2 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 29°-56°°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%(slab-on-grade)or 98%(grade beams)of ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) Standard Proctor ASTM D 698,+2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Tracichoe, 1-Bobcat � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind, 1-Jumping jack Progress Report: See Sheet 2 of 4. Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck and hose assembly This report presents opinions formed as a result of our obseivations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied m�the contractar to continue applying the recommended compactive effbrt and moisture to the fill duri�g times wl�en our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as belicved necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i�ions on whether the fill meets s ecificatio�s. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/9/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 75D Sheet: 4 of 4 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 54°F± in enclosed area Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): 2°d to 3�d Le�e�sta�rS,Land�ng Topp�ng and steps Location of Observations: Gridlines E A to E-A.3, E-18.7 to E-19 Sheet or Plan Number: 5204 and 9/5316 Meets Project Spec. 2°d to 3`d Level Stairs,Landing Topping Relj�I': Grid]1rieS E 1�t0 E-l�.3, E-1 g.� t0 E-I9 yeS ri0 and Steps Dowels: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-0" each corner � ❑ Nosing bars: Size: #4 Spacing: Each corner � ❑ Bottom: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-6"o.c. each way, each comer � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-8.5"at landing � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/10/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 76A Sheet: 1 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood-(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction-(970)241-7700 Interiar Slab-on-grade and Grade Beam Fill 1309 Elkhorn Drive ECO Building Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 247 Gridlines B.0/3.7(slab-on-grade) -7.5± 131.1 7.7 128.5 8.1 98 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 248 Gridlines A.6/09(slab-on-grade) Grade± 131.1 7.7 133.5 5.7 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 249 Gridlines A.8/2.4(slab-on-grade) Grade± 131.1 7.7 132.8 6.8 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 250 Gridlines A.9/4.0(grade beam) -5.0-E- 131.1 7.7 131.2 7.3 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 251 Gridlines A.7/5.0(grade beam) -5.5± 131.1 7.7 130.5 9.1 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 252 Gridlines A.6/3.6(slab-on-grade) -3.0-E- 131.1 7.7 129.7 6.6 99 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 253 Gridlines A.6/5.6(slab-on-grade) -3.0± 131.1 7.7 131.7 9.1 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sum� � Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 31°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%(slab-on-grade)or 98%(grade beams)of ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) Standard Proctor ASTM D 698,+2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Tracichoe, 1-Bobcat � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind, 1-7umping jack Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test fill for the interior slab-on-grade and grade beams for the ECO Building. Test results indicate that Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches moisture and density tests performed at the noted locations have met project Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck and hose assembly specifications. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our obseivations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied m�the contractar to continue applying the recommended compactive effbrt and moisture to the fill duri�g times wl�en our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i�ions on whether the fill meets s ecificatio�s. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/10/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 76B Sheet: 2 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 44°F± in enclosed area Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Northeast Stairs,Leve12 to 3,Landing Topping and Steps Location of Observations: Gridlines E A to E-A.3, E-1 to E-1.3 Sheet or Plan Number: 5201 and 9/5316 Meets Project Spec. Northeast Stairs,Level 2 to 3,Landing Rebar: Grldllnes E A to E-A.3, E-1 to E-1.3 yes no Topping and Steps Dowels: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-0" each corner � ❑ Nosing: Size: #4 Spacing: Each corner � ❑ Bottom: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-6" o.c. each way, each comer � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-2"at landing � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/ll/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 77 Sheet: 1 of 1 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 35°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer was en route to the site, as requested, to perform moisture and density testing for the fill placement for the ECO Building. While field engineer was en route to the site, the contractor called him and informed him that the day's testing was cancelled due to excessive traffic on the road and at Vail. Therefore,no moisture and density testing was performed this day. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, ING Job No. ]0-039 Date: 12/13/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Report#: 78A Sheet: 1 of 2 Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testint Department of Public Works/Transportation Lakewood-(303)989-1223 Interior Slab-on-grade,Retaining Wall 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction-(970)241-7700 Footing Pad,and Foundation Wall Fill Vail,Colorado 81657 ECO Building Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado Laboratory Field Depth Ma�mum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) ( c� (%) ( c� (%) 254 Gridlincs A.3/5.7(slab-on-grade) -0.5± 1311 7.7 133.0 7.7 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 255 Gridlines A.1/3.6(slab-on-grade) -2.0± 131.1 7.7 124.0 7.8 95 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 256 5'-9"East of Gridlines A.7/8A(retaining -5.0± 1311 7.7 133.8 6.7 100 Pass Curve#2 wall footin ad SAND Gravell Sil 257 2'East of Gridlines B.4/8.0(retaining wall -5.0± 131.1 7.7 1291 9.1 98 Pass Curve#2 footin ad SAND Gravell Sil 258 12'East of Gridlines B.0/8.0(retaining wall -4.0± 1311 7.7 130.4 9.4 99 Pass Curve#2 footin ad SAND Gravell Sil 259 6'East of Gridlines A.8/8.0(retaining wall -2.0± 131.1 7.7 129.0 8.5 98 Pass Curve#2 footin ad SAND Gravell Sil 260 10'East of Gridlines B.2/8.0(retaining wall -1.0± 1311 7.7 125.1 7.9 95 Fail Curve#2 footin ad SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 26°-48°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%(slab-on-grade and foundation wall)or 98% ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) (retaining wall footing pad)of Standard Proctor ASTM D 698,+2%to-2%of Optimum and Should be Removed or Reworked. Moisture Content Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 2-Trackhoes, 1-Bobcat � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction UniYs: 1-Walk-behind Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested,to observe and test the fill for the interior slab-on-grade,retaining wall footing pad,and foundation walls far the ECO Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches Building. Test results indicate that moishire and density tests performed at the noted Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck and hose assembly locations have met project speci�carions. This report presen[s opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction[esting of the fill d�ring this visiC. We have relied on the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not'observing operations. Tests are made of the fill onLy as beLieved necessary to calibrate our observer's'ud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o inions on whetherthe fill meets s ecifications. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, ING Job No. ]0-039 Date: 12/13/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 78B Sheet: 2 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testint Department of Public Works/Transportation Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Interior Slab-on-grade,Retaining Wall 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Footing Pad,and Foundation Wall Fill Vail,Colorado 81657 ECO Building Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado Laboratory Field Depth Ma�mum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) ( c� (%) ( c� (%) 261 2.5' East of Gridlines A.6/8.0(foundation -11.0± 1311 7.7 129.8 8.2 99 Pass Curve#2 walls SAND Gravell Sil 262 Retest of Tcst#260(retaining wall footing -1.0± 131.1 7.7 133.0 6.8 100 Pass Curve#2 ad SAND Gravell Sil 263 5'North of Gridlines A.0/7.4(foundation -8.0± 1311 7.7 132.0 6.7 100 Pass Curve#2 walls SAND Gravell Sil 264 7'East of Gridlines B.6/8.0(retaining wall Grade± 131.1 7.7 130.2 8.2 99 Pass Curve#2 footin ad SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 26°-48°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%(slab-on-grade and foundation wall)or 98% ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) (retaining wall footing pad)of Standard Proctor ASTM D 698,+2%to-2%of Optimum and Should be Removed or Reworked. Moisture Content Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 2-Trackhoes, 1-Bobcat � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction UniYs: 1-Walk-behind Progress Report: See Sheet 1 of 2. Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck with hose assembly This report presenCS opinions formed as a res�lt of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visiC. We have relied on the contractm to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the FiLI only as believed necessary to caLibrate our obseiver's'ud�ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/14/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 79A Sheet: 1 of 3 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood-(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Obs�rvation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Grand Junction-(970)241-7700 Foundation Wall and Interior Slab-on- 1309 Elkhorn Drive grade Fill Vail,Colorado 81657 ECO Building Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colarado Laborato Field Depth Maximum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) c� (%) c� (%) 265 9'North and 9'East of Gridlines A.0/8.0 -10.0± 131.1 7.7 127.7 8.7 97 Pass Curve#2 foundation wall SAND Gravell Sil 266 4.5' East of Gridlines A.0/8A(foundation -10.0± 131.1 7.7 125.7 7.6 96 Pass Curve#2 wall SAND Gravell Sil 267 Gridlines B.0/6.5(slab-on-grade) -7.5± 131.1 7.7 131.2 9.3 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 268 Gridlines A.8/7.7(slab-on-grade) -7.5± 131.1 7.7 125.7 9.6 96 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 269 Gridlines A.3/7.8(slab-on-grade) -6.0± 131.1 7.7 122.7 9.7 94 Fail Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 270 Gridlines A.5/7.2(slab-on-grade) -6.0± 131.1 7.7 123.1 10.7 94 Fail Ciuve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 271 Retest of Test#269(slab-on-grade) -6.0± 131.1 7.7 125.0 10.3 95 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 31°-38°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of Standard Proctor ASTM D 698, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe, 1-Bobcat � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested,to observe and test fill for the foundation wall and the interior slab-on-grade far the ECO Building. Test results Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches indicate that moisture and density tests performed at the noted locations have met project Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck and hose assembly specifications. This re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on tlie coi�trac[ar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and�noisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i��ions on whether the fill meets s ecificatim�s. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/14/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 79B Sheet: 2 of 3 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Foundation Wall and Interiar Slab-on- 1309 Elkhorn Drive grade Fill Vail,Colorado 81657 ECO Building Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colarado Laborato Field Depth Maximum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) c� (%) c� (%) 272 Retest of Test#270 -6.0± 131.1 7.7 1241 10.4 95 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 273 Gridlines A.4/6.7 -4.5± 131.1 7.7 124.7 101 95 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 274 Gridlines A.7/7.6 -4.5± 131.1 7.7 128.8 9.0 98 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 275 Gridlines A.5/6.5 -3.0± 131.1 7.7 127.4 9.1 97 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 276 Gridlines B.6/7.8 -3.0± 131.1 7.7 125.3 9.8 96 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sunn � Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 31°-38°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of Standard Proctar ASTM D 698, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Trackhoe, 1-Bobcat � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Progress Report: See Sheet 1 of 3. Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck and hose assembly This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on the coi�trac[ar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and�noisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operetions. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i��ions on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/14/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 79C Sheet: 3 of 3 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 31°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Northeasc sta�r curbs and Norcheasc sta�r De�k Apron Topping Locatlon of Observatlons: Gridlines E-18.7/E-A to E-A.3, E-A.3/E-18 9 to E-19, and E-A.3 to E-A.4, �18.7 to �19 Sheet or Plan Number: 5203, 5204, 4/5316, and 4/5211 Meets Project Spec. Northeast Stair Curbs Rebar: Gridlines E-18.7/E-A to E-A.3 and E-A.3/E-18.9 to E-19 yes no Dowels: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-4" o.c. - U bars - epoxied � ❑ Top of U bars Size: 2 - #4 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. Nartheast Stair Deck Apron Topping RebaT: GTldllnes �A.3 to E-A.4, E-1 8.7 to E-19 yes no Bottom: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-6"o.c. each way � ❑ Dowels: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. over double T's—epoxied � ❑ Extra dowels: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-4" o.c. at perimeter � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By