Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-039 Daily Field Reports 80 to 84 SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/15/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 80A Sheet: 1 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Interiar Slab-on-grade Fill 1309 Elkhorn Drive ECO Building Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colorado LaboraYo Field Depth MaJCimum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) cf� (%) cfl (%) 277 Gridlines A.1/7.2 Grade± 131.1 7.7 129.2 7.2 99 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 278 Gridlines B.0/7.6 Grade± 131.1 7.7 131.5 6.9 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sum� � Cloud ❑ Rain � Snow Tem : °F± � Fill Tested Meets Specitications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95°/o of Standard Proctar ASTM D 698, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Tracichoe, 1-Bobcat � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test backfill for the interior slab-on-grade at Gridlines A.0-C.0/61-8.0. Test results indicate that Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches moisture and density tests performed at the noted locations have met project Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck and hose assembly specifications. Tl�is re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit. We have relied o�the coi�tractar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment Test data are not tlie sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/15/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 80B Sheet: 2 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain � Snow Temp: 28°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): 3`d Level Southwest Stair Curbs and�eck Topping Location of Observations: Gridlines E A.3/E 1 to �1.1; E 1.3/E-A to &A.3; E-A3 to E-A.5/�l to E-1.3; and E-A to �A.3/�1.3 to E-2.5 Sheet or Plan Number: A201, 5201, 4 typ/5316, and 4/5211 Meets Project Spec. 3rd Level Southwest Stair Curbs Rebar: Gridlines E-A.3/E-1 to E-l.l; and E-13/E-A to E-A.3 yes no Dowels: Size: #3 Spacing: 1'-4" o.c. � ❑ Top: Size: 2 - #4 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. 3`d Level Southwest Stair Deck Rebar: Gridlines E-A3 to E-A.5/�1 to E-1.3; and E-A to E-A.3/ yes no To in E-1.3 to E-2.5 Bottom: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-6"o.c. each way � ❑ Dowels: Size: #3 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. over double T's, epoxied � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-7.5"to 5'-10"at topping mat � ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/16/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 81 Sheet: 1 of 1 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Grade Bcams,Foundation Wall,and 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Footing Pads Vail,Colorado 81657 ECO Building Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colarado Laborato Field Depth Maximum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) c� (%) c� (%) 279 Gridlines A.0/4.0 Grade± 131.1 7.7 128.9 7.8 98 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 280 Gridlines A.2/5.1 Grade± 131.1 7.7 129.1 7.6 98 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 281 Gridlines A.0/0.2 Grade± 131.1 7.7 133.8 8.0 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 282 Gridlines A.0/19 Grade± 131.1 7.7 129.5 9.1 99 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 283 Gridlines A.0/2.8 Grade± 131.1 7.7 129.8 7.5 99 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sunn ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 21°-30°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 98%of Standard Proctar ASTM D 698, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Tracichoe � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test backfill for the foundation wall with 2 footing pads between Gridlines A.0-A.3/3.5-6.0 and the grade Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: N/A beams between Gridlines A.0-A.3/0.0-3.0. Test results indicate that moisture and densily Method of Adding Moisture: None tests performed at the noted locations have met project speci�cations. This r¢port presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit. We have relied on the coi�tractar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and�noisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing opErations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i��ions on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/17/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 82A Sheet: 1 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 21° - 29°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footing, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): 2 Footing Pads in Continuous Footing and Foundation Wall Location of Observations: Gridlines A.0/4.0,A.0/5.0, and Gridlines A.0-A.3/3.5-6.0 Sheet or Plan Number: S 101, F3/5311, and 6/5312 Meets Project Spec. Footing Pads Rebar: Gridlines A.0/4.0 and A.0/5.0 yes no Bottom: Size: 4 - #5 Spacing: Each way � ❑ Dowels: Size: 8 - #8 Spacing: Observed � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. Foundation Wall Rebar: Gridlines A.0-A.3/3.5-6.0 yes no Bottom: Size: 3 - #5 Spacing. Continuous � ❑ Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/17/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 82B Sheet: 2 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 21° - 29°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footing, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Retaining Wall Footing Pad Location of Observations: Gridlines A.7-C.2/8.0 to 15' East Sheet or Plan Number: S 101 and 6/5319 Meets Project Spec. Retaining Wall Footing Pad Rebar: Gridlines A.7-C.2, 8.0 to 15' East yes no Bottom: Size: 5 - #5 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Top: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Top: Size: #7 Spacing: 0'-9" o.c. transverse � ❑ Standard hooks: Size: #7 Spacing: 0'-9" o.c. � ❑ Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. outside face � ❑ Dowels: Size: #7 Spacing: 0'-9"o.c. inside face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-7.5" for#7 at top mat � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/21/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 83 Sheet: 1 of 1 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain � Snow Temp: 35°F± Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer was en route to the job site to observe reinforcing steel (rebar) and to perform concrete tests, as requested. Field engineer was contacted by the contractar and told that the testing scheduled for the day had been cancelled. Therefore,no rebar observations or concrete tests were performed this day. Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/22/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 84A Sheet: 1 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 40°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): ECO Building Walls Location of Observations: Gridlines A.8-C.1/8.0-8.5 and A.0-A.2/4.0-6.0 Sheet or Plan Number: 6/5319 and 6/5312 Meets Project Spec. ECO Building Walls Rebar: Gridlines A.8-C.1/8.0-8.5 yes no Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. outside face � ❑ Vertical: Size: #7 Spacing: 0'-9"o.c. inside face � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-0"to 3'-0" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Wall Rebar: Gridlines A.0-A.2/4.0-6.0 yes no Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-0" � ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By 10-�REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/22/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 84B Sheet: 2 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 40°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Eco su��d�ng EXter�or stem walt�Grade seam Location of Observations: Gridlines A.0/15' West of Gridlines 1.0 to 3.0 Sheet or Plan Number: 5/5312 Meets Project Spec. Eco Building Exterior stem Rebar: Gridlines A.0/15' West of Gridlines 1.0 to 3.0 yes no Wall/Grade Beam Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By