HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-039 Daily Field Reports 80 to 84 SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/15/10
Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 80A Sheet: 1 of 2
Geotechnical and Materials Engineers
Town Engineer Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Subject: Fill Observation and Testine
Department of Public Works/Transportation Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Interiar Slab-on-grade Fill
1309 Elkhorn Drive ECO Building
Vail,Colorado 81657 Lionshead Transit Center
Vail,Colorado
LaboraYo Field
Depth MaJCimum Optimum
Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type
No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction
(feet) cf� (%) cfl (%)
277 Gridlines A.1/7.2 Grade± 131.1 7.7 129.2 7.2 99 Pass Curve#2
SAND Gravell Sil
278 Gridlines B.0/7.6 Grade± 131.1 7.7 131.5 6.9 100 Pass Curve#2
SAND Gravell Sil
Weather: ❑ Sum� � Cloud ❑ Rain � Snow Tem : °F± � Fill Tested Meets Specitications.
Specification Compaction&Material: 95°/o of Standard Proctar ASTM D 698, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s)
+2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked.
Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Tracichoe, 1-Bobcat � Contractor Advised.
❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation.
Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test backfill
for the interior slab-on-grade at Gridlines A.0-C.0/61-8.0. Test results indicate that
Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches moisture and density tests performed at the noted locations have met project
Method of Adding Moisture: Water truck and hose assembly specifications.
Tl�is re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit.
We have relied o�the coi�tractar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill during
times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our
observer's jud ment Test data are not tlie sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecifications.
Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E.
Field Observer Reviewed By
REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Geotechnical and Materials Engineers
Lakewood—(303)989-1223
Grand Junction—(970)241-7700
To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/15/10
Tom Kassmel,P.E.
Town Engineer Report#: 80B Sheet: 2 of 2
Department of Public Works/Transportation
1309 Elkhorn Drive
Vail,Colorado 81657
Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado
Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain � Snow Temp: 28°F±
Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations:
Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): 3`d Level Southwest Stair Curbs and�eck
Topping
Location of Observations: Gridlines E A.3/E 1 to �1.1; E 1.3/E-A to &A.3; E-A3 to E-A.5/�l to E-1.3; and E-A to
�A.3/�1.3 to E-2.5
Sheet or Plan Number: A201, 5201, 4 typ/5316, and 4/5211
Meets Project Spec.
3rd Level Southwest Stair Curbs Rebar: Gridlines E-A.3/E-1 to E-l.l; and E-13/E-A to E-A.3 yes no
Dowels: Size: #3 Spacing: 1'-4" o.c. � ❑
Top: Size: 2 - #4 Spacing: Continuous � ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑
Meets Project Spec.
3`d Level Southwest Stair Deck Rebar: Gridlines E-A3 to E-A.5/�1 to E-1.3; and E-A to E-A.3/ yes no
To in E-1.3 to E-2.5
Bottom: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-6"o.c. each way � ❑
Dowels: Size: #3 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. over double T's, epoxied � ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-7.5"to 5'-10"at topping mat � ❑
Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no
noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑
Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E.
Field Observer Reviewed By
SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/16/10
Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 81 Sheet: 1 of 1
Geotechnical and Materials Engineers
Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine
Department of Public Works/Transpartation Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Grade Bcams,Foundation Wall,and
1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Footing Pads
Vail,Colorado 81657 ECO Building
Lionshead Transit Center
Vail,Colarado
Laborato Field
Depth Maximum Optimum
Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type
No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction
(feet) c� (%) c� (%)
279 Gridlines A.0/4.0 Grade± 131.1 7.7 128.9 7.8 98 Pass Curve#2
SAND Gravell Sil
280 Gridlines A.2/5.1 Grade± 131.1 7.7 129.1 7.6 98 Pass Curve#2
SAND Gravell Sil
281 Gridlines A.0/0.2 Grade± 131.1 7.7 133.8 8.0 100 Pass Curve#2
SAND Gravell Sil
282 Gridlines A.0/19 Grade± 131.1 7.7 129.5 9.1 99 Pass Curve#2
SAND Gravell Sil
283 Gridlines A.0/2.8 Grade± 131.1 7.7 129.8 7.5 99 Pass Curve#2
SAND Gravell Sil
Weather: ❑ Sunn ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 21°-30°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications.
Specification Compaction&Material: 98%of Standard Proctar ASTM D 698, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s)
+2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked.
Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 1-Tracichoe � Contractor Advised.
❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation.
Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site,as requested,to observe and test backfill
for the foundation wall with 2 footing pads between Gridlines A.0-A.3/3.5-6.0 and the grade
Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: N/A beams between Gridlines A.0-A.3/0.0-3.0. Test results indicate that moisture and densily
Method of Adding Moisture: None tests performed at the noted locations have met project speci�cations.
This r¢port presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit.
We have relied on the coi�tractar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and�noisture to the fill during
times when our observer is not observing opErations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our
observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i��ions on whether the fill meets s ecifications.
Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E.
Field Observer Reviewed By
REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Geotechnical and Materials Engineers
Lakewood—(303)989-1223
Grand Junction—(970)241-7700
To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/17/10
Tom Kassmel,P.E.
Town Engineer Report#: 82A Sheet: 1 of 2
Department of Public Works/Transportation
1309 Elkhorn Drive
Vail,Colorado 81657
Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado
Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 21° - 29°F±
Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations:
Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footing, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): 2 Footing Pads in Continuous Footing
and Foundation Wall
Location of Observations: Gridlines A.0/4.0,A.0/5.0, and Gridlines A.0-A.3/3.5-6.0
Sheet or Plan Number: S 101, F3/5311, and 6/5312
Meets Project Spec.
Footing Pads Rebar: Gridlines A.0/4.0 and A.0/5.0 yes no
Bottom: Size: 4 - #5 Spacing: Each way � ❑
Dowels: Size: 8 - #8 Spacing: Observed � ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑
Meets Project Spec.
Foundation Wall Rebar: Gridlines A.0-A.3/3.5-6.0 yes no
Bottom: Size: 3 - #5 Spacing. Continuous � ❑
Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑
Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no
noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑
Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E.
Field Observer Reviewed By
REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Geotechnical and Materials Engineers
Lakewood—(303)989-1223
Grand Junction—(970)241-7700
To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/17/10
Tom Kassmel,P.E.
Town Engineer Report#: 82B Sheet: 2 of 2
Department of Public Works/Transportation
1309 Elkhorn Drive
Vail,Colorado 81657
Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado
Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 21° - 29°F±
Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations:
Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footing, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Retaining Wall Footing Pad
Location of Observations: Gridlines A.7-C.2/8.0 to 15' East
Sheet or Plan Number: S 101 and 6/5319
Meets Project Spec.
Retaining Wall Footing Pad Rebar: Gridlines A.7-C.2, 8.0 to 15' East yes no
Bottom: Size: 5 - #5 Spacing: Continuous � ❑
Top: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑
Top: Size: #7 Spacing: 0'-9" o.c. transverse � ❑
Standard hooks: Size: #7 Spacing: 0'-9" o.c. � ❑
Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. outside face � ❑
Dowels: Size: #7 Spacing: 0'-9"o.c. inside face � ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 3'-7.5" for#7 at top mat � ❑
Meets Project Spec.
Rebar: yes no
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑
Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no
noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑
Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E.
Field Observer Reviewed By
REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Geotechnical and Materials Engineers
Lakewood—(303)989-1223
Grand Junction—(970)241-7700
To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/21/10
Tom Kassmel,P.E.
Town Engineer Report#: 83 Sheet: 1 of 1
Department of Public Works/Transportation
1309 Elkhorn Drive
Vail,Colorado 81657
Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado
Weather: ❑ Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain � Snow Temp: 35°F±
Construction Activities/Observations: Field engineer was en route to the job site to observe reinforcing steel
(rebar) and to perform concrete tests, as requested.
Field engineer was contacted by the contractar and told that the testing scheduled for the day had been cancelled.
Therefore,no rebar observations or concrete tests were performed this day.
Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E.
Field Observer Reviewed By
REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Geotechnical and Materials Engineers
Lakewood—(303)989-1223
Grand Junction—(970)241-7700
To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/22/10
Tom Kassmel,P.E.
Town Engineer Report#: 84A Sheet: 1 of 2
Department of Public Works/Transportation
1309 Elkhorn Drive
Vail,Colorado 81657
Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado
Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 40°F±
Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations:
Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): ECO Building Walls
Location of Observations: Gridlines A.8-C.1/8.0-8.5 and A.0-A.2/4.0-6.0
Sheet or Plan Number: 6/5319 and 6/5312
Meets Project Spec.
ECO Building Walls Rebar: Gridlines A.8-C.1/8.0-8.5 yes no
Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑
Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. outside face � ❑
Vertical: Size: #7 Spacing: 0'-9"o.c. inside face � ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-0"to 3'-0" � ❑
Meets Project Spec.
Wall Rebar: Gridlines A.0-A.2/4.0-6.0 yes no
Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑
Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-0" � ❑
Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no
noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑
Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E.
Field Observer Reviewed By
10-�REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Geotechnical and Materials Engineers
Lakewood—(303)989-1223
Grand Junction—(970)241-7700
To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/22/10
Tom Kassmel,P.E.
Town Engineer Report#: 84B Sheet: 2 of 2
Department of Public Works/Transportation
1309 Elkhorn Drive
Vail,Colorado 81657
Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado
Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 40°F±
Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations:
Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Eco su��d�ng EXter�or stem walt�Grade seam
Location of Observations: Gridlines A.0/15' West of Gridlines 1.0 to 3.0
Sheet or Plan Number: 5/5312
Meets Project Spec.
Eco Building Exterior stem Rebar: Gridlines A.0/15' West of Gridlines 1.0 to 3.0 yes no
Wall/Grade Beam
Horizontal: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑
Vertical: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑
Meets Project Spec.
Rebar: yes no
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑
Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑
Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no
noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑
Mike Brath Scott B. Myers, P.E.
Field Observer Reviewed By