The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-039 Daily Field Reports 85 86 SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/27/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 85A Sheet: 1 of 4 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Lalcewood-(303)989-1223 Gradc Beam/Foundation Walls,Grade 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction-(970)241-7700 Beams,and Interior Slab-on-grade Vail,Colorado 81657 ECO Building Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colarado Laborato Field Depth Maximum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) c� (%) c� (%) 284 2.0'North of Gridlines A.0/0.5(exterior -3.0± 131.1 7.7 1331 9.4 100 Pass Curve#2 rade beam/foundation walls SAND Gravell Sil 285 2.5'North of Gridlines A.0/2.7(exterior -3.0± 131.1 7.7 129.8 9.3 99 Pass Curve#2 rade beam/foundation walls SAND Gravell Sil 286 Gridlines A.1/09(interior slab-on-grade) -4.0± 131.1 7.7 124.5 10.8 95 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 287 Gridlines A.2/4.6(interior slab-on-grade) -5.0± 131.1 7.7 130.7 10.8 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 288 Gridlines A I/2.5(interior slab-on-grade) -3.0± 131.1 7.7 125.2 10.2 95 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 289 2.0'North of Gridlines A.0/3.8(exterior -2.0± 131.1 7.7 129.3 9.4 99 Pass Ciuve#2 rade beam/foundation walls SAND Gravell Sil 290 3.0'North of Gridlines A.0/5.0(exterior -1.0± 131.1 7.7 129.7 8.5 99 Pass Curve#2 rade beam/foundation walls SAND Gravell Sil Weather: ❑ Sunn � Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 30°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of Standard Proctar ASTM D 698, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 2-Trackhoes � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind, 1-Jumping jack Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test the fill placed for the exteriar grade beam/foundation wa11s, the interior side of the grade Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches beam/foundation walls and grade beams, and the interior slab-on-grade. Test results Method of Adding Moisture: None indicate that moisture and density tests performed at the noted locations have met project This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during this visit SpeClflGatlOriS. We have relied on tlie coi�trac[ar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and�noisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i��ions on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/27/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 85B Sheet: 2 of 4 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Gradc Beam/Foundation Walls,Grade 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 Beams,and Interior Slab-on-grade Vail,Colorado 81657 ECO Building Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colarado Laborato Field Depth Maximum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) c� (%) c� (%) 291 Gridlines A.3/49(interior slab-on-grade) -3.0± 131.1 7.7 131.5 8.7 100 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 292 Gridlines A.6/2.0(interior grade Grade± 131.1 7.7 131.1 9.7 100 Pass Curve#2 beam/foundation walls SAND,Gravell ,Sil 293 Gridlines A.5/1.0(interior grade Grade± 131.1 7.7 130.5 9.8 100 Pass Curve#2 beam/foundation walls SAND Gravell Sil 294 Gridlines A.3/3.2(planter slab-on-grade) Grade-±- 131.1 7.7 129.4 8.7 99 Pass Curve#2 SAND Gravell Sil 295 2.0'North of Gridlines A.0/3.5(planter Grade± 131.1 7.7 124.5 10.8 95 Pass Curve#2 slab-on- rade SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sunn ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 31°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of Standard Proctar ASTM D 698, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 2-Trackhoes � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Jumping jack, 1-Walk behind Progress Report: See Sheet 1 of 4. Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches Method of Adding Moisture: None This re�ort presents opinions formed as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of tl�e fill during this visit. We have relied on the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and inoisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests are made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not the sole basis for o i��ions on whether the fill meets s ecifications. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/27/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 85C Sheet: 3 of 4 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 31°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): ECO Building: Interior Slab-on-grade and Typical Slab-on-grade Sump Pit Location of Observations: Gridlines A.0-C.0/6.1-8.0 and A.2/6.4 Sheet or Plan Number: S 101, 1/5316 typical, S 100, and 7/5316 Meets Project Spec. Interior Slab-on-grade Rebar: Gridlines A.0-C.0/6.1-8.0 yes no Bottom: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-4"o.c. each way � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) yes Length: 2'-4.25" � ❑ Meets Project Spec. Typical Slab-on-grade Sump Pit Rebar: Gridlines A.2/6.4 yes no Vertical sides: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Horizontal sides: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-0" o.c. � ❑ Bottom: Size: #4 Spacing: Each way,was omitted ❑ � Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has not been properly placed and has not met project specifications. ❑ � Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/27/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 85D Sheet: 4 of 4 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: ❑ Sunny � Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 31°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Grade Beams Location of Observations: Gridlines A.0-B.0/1.0 and A.0-B.0/2.0 Sheet or Plan Number: S 101, 3/5313, and 2/5313 Meets Project Spec. Grade Beams Rebar: Gridlines A.0-B.0/1.0 and A.0-B.0/2.0 yes no Bottom: Size: 4 - #7 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Each side: Size: 3 - #5 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Stirrups: Size: #3 Spacing: 0'-10" o.c. � ❑ Top: Size: 4 - #5 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. Rebar: yes no Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted 'm this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By SOIL COMPACTION TEST RESULTS To: Town of Vail KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/28/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Report#: 86A Sheet: 1 of 2 Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Town Engineer Subject: Fill Observation and Testine Department of Public Works/Transpartation Lalcewood—(303)989-1223 Retaining and Foundation Wall Fill and 1309 Elkhorn Drive Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 West Half of Planter Box Vail,Colorado 81657 ECO Building Lionshead Transit Center Vail,Colarado Laborato Field Depth Maximum Optimum Test Location or Dry Moisture Dry Moisture Percent Pass/Fail Soil Type No. Elevation Density Content Density Content Compaction (feet) c� (%) c� (%) 296 3.0'East of Gridlines A.6/8.0(retaining and -3.0± 131.1 7.7 124.2 9.9 95 Pass Curve#2 foundation wall SAND Gravell Sil 297 10.0'East of Gridlines A.3/8A(retaining -4.5± 131.1 7.7 124.1 10.3 95 Pass Curve#2 and foundation wall SAND Gravell Sil 298 2.0'North of Gridlines A.0/6.3(west half of Grade± 131.1 7.7 127.7 10.0 97 Pass Curve#2 lanter box SAND Gravell Sil 299 3.0'North,4.0'East of Gridlines A.0/8.0 -3.0± 131.1 7.7 126.3 8.4 96 Pass Curve#2 retainin and foundation wall SAND Gravell Sil Weather: � Sunn ❑ Cloud ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Tem : 35°F± � Fill Tested Meets Specifications. Specification Compaction&Material: 95%of Standard Proctar ASTM D 698, ❑ Fill Tested Does Not Meet Specifications as Indicated by Test Number(s) +2%to-2%of Optimum Moisture Content and Should be Removed or Reworked. Type and Number of Earth Moving Units: 2-Tracichoes, 1-Bobcat � Contractor Advised. ❑ Full Time Observation. � Part Time Observation. Type and Number of Compaction Units: 1-Walk-behind Progress Report: Field engineer arrived on-site, as requested, to observe and test the fill for the retaining and foundarion walls and the west half of the planter box for the ECO Number of Passes: Varies Thickness of Lift: 8 inches Building. Test results indicate that moisture and density tests performed at the noted Method of Adding Moisture: None locations have met project specifications. This report presents opinions fonned as a result of our observations and/or compaction testing of the fill during tl�is visit. We have relied on tlie coi�tractar to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and inoisture to the fill during times when our observer is not observing operations. Tests arc made of the fill only as believed necessary to calibrate our observer's jud ment. Test data are not tlie sole basis for o inions on whether the fill meets s ecificatioi�s. Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By REINFORCING STEEL (REBAR) OBSERVATION KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Lakewood—(303)989-1223 Grand Junction—(970)241-7700 To: Town of Vail Job No. 10-039 Date: 12/28/10 Tom Kassmel,P.E. Town Engineer Report#: 86B Sheet: 2 of 2 Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail,Colorado 81657 Project: Lionshead Transit Center,Vail, Colorado Weather: � Sunny ❑ Cloudy ❑ Rain ❑ Snow Temp: 35°F± Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) Observations: Type of Structure: (Wall, Grade Beam, Footin�, Slab-on-�rade, etc.): Grade Beams and Planter Boxes Location of Observations: Gridlines A.0-C.0/4.0, A.0-C.0/5.0, A.0-A.6/3.0-3.3, and A.0/3.0-4.0 to 4.0' North Sheet or Plan Number: S 101, 1/5313, and 9/5313 Meets Project Spec. Grade Beams Rebar: Gridlines A.0-C.0/4.0 and A.0-C.0/5.0 yes no Top: Size: 4 - #5 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Sides: Size: 2 - #5 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Stirrups: Size: #3 Spacing: 0'-10" o.c. � ❑ Bottom: Size: 4 - #7 Spacing: Continuous � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Meets Project Spec. Planter Boxes Rebar: Gridlines A.0-A.6/3.0-3.3, and A.0/3.0-4.0 to 4.0' North yes no Bottom: Size: #4 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c. each way � ❑ Dowels: Size: #3 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c. drilled and epo�ry into walls � ❑ Dowels: Size: #5 Spacing: 1'-0"o.c. for planter walls � ❑ Bottom: Size: 2 - #5 Spacing: Continuous at planter walls � ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Size: Spacing: ❑ ❑ Splices:(yes/no) no Length: ❑ ❑ Discrepancies/Remarks: Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the reinforcing steel (rebar) yes no noted in this Daily Field Report has been properly placed and has met project specifications. � ❑ Don Sneed Scott B. Myers, P.E. Field Observer Reviewed By