HomeMy WebLinkAboutB11-0069 Safebuilt/TOV email regarding electrical reinspectionLynne Campbell
From:
Martin Haeberle
Sent:
Wednesday, July 13, 2011 1:47 PM
To:
newelectric @mountaincomm.net
Cc:
ComDev_Admin; JR Mondragon
Subject:
FW: Lions Square Lodge North - Reinspection Fee
Jay,
It appears from Matt's email that the general called the inspection in. The fee is not for the failed inspection.
The re- inspection will be required.
Thankyou
Martin
Martin Haeberle
Building Official
Community Development
kq '
TOWN OF VAIL
970.479.2142
970.376.2672
vailgov.com
twitter.com /vailgov
[A
From: Matt Denney [mailto:MDenney @safebuilt.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 20119:00 AM
To: Martin Haeberle
Cc: Shane Gremmer
Subject: Lions Square Lodge North - Reinspection Fee
Martin,
An electrical final inspection was scheduled for the Lions Square Lodge North building, 1 St floor condo. I called the
contact number listed on the inspection ticket approximately 30 minutes prior to arriving on -site and left a message
detailing my E.T.A. to the location. Upon arrival, no one was on -site nor in the condo unit. I proceeded with my next
inspection at the Montanero's building to the north of Lions Square lodge North with intentions of returning for a
second try at locating the contractor. It took me approximately 20 minutes to perform the inspection at the
Montanero's building, so I returned to Lions Square lodge. While walking back to the building, I made a second attempt
to phone the contractor listed as the requestor, and had negative contact.
At the end of the day, I returned to the T.O.V. building to complete the inspection input into Permits Plus. At that time I
informed the T.O.V. staff that there was no one on -site and no access to perform the inspection so a fee was added to
the permit per the T.O.V. re- inspection fee policy.
This was simply a no show for the inspection that was requested. I made every attempt to contact the requestor and to
perform the inspection. The very next day, the inspection was scheduled again and the general contractor was
there. He apologized for not being there the previous day and the inspection was performed. The inspection failed
because the receptacles that were added did not meet the tamper resistant requirement.
Please let me know if you need any further information.
Matt Denney
Building Inspector
SAFEWRO
303 - 754 -3363
N