HomeMy WebLinkAboutB11-0215 NOTE: TH/S PERM/T MUST BE POSTED ON JOBS/TE AT ALL T/MES
,.
�7WN OF VA(I„`'
Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road,Vail, Colorado 81657
p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149
COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Permit #: B11-0215
Project #: PRJ11-0110
Job Address: 1127 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL Applied.....: 07/15/2011
Location......: Issued. . . : 08/31/2011
Parcel No....: 210109205003
OWNER HADLEY, PHILIP A. 07/15/2011
61 DAWN HARBOR LN
RIVERSIDE
CT 06878
APPLICANT HERMES MOUNTAIN CLASSICS LLC 07/15/2011 Phone: 970-926-1720
RICK HERMES
PO BOX 2633
EDWARDS
CO 81632
License: C000003225
CONTRACTOR HERMES MOUNTAIN CLASSICS LLC 07/15/2011 Phone:970-926-1720
RICK HERMES
PO BOX 2633
EDWARDS
CO 81632
License:C000003225
Description:
NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Occupancy: R-3 Type Construction: VB Valuation: $2,062,000.00
...............,...............,,...�,,...............,.,,...,.....,,..........,+... FEE SUMMARY ..,,...,.«.,.».....,.....x...,.,..,,......,.....,..........,.,......,..........
Building Permit-----------> $9,485.05 Bldg Plan Check----------> $6,165.28 Use Tax Fee-----------------------> $41,040.00
Electrical Permit---------> $943.00 Elec Plan Check-----------> $612.95 Restuarant Plan Review--------> $0.00
Mechanical Permit------> $2,340.00 Mech Plan Check---------> $585.00 Additional Fees--------------------> $0.00
Plumbing Permit--------> $915.00 Plmb Plan Check---------> $228.75 Recreation Fee--------------------> $1,230.00
Investigation-----------------------> $0.00
Will Call------------------------------> $20.00
TOTAL PERMIT FEES--------------> $63,565.03
Payments-------------------------------> $63,565.03
BALANCE DUE------------------------> $0.00
.........................,...»...,.............................��.........x...,.........,..x.....................,,.x..�,,.....x...............�.........._._....«.................x.....
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out in full the information required,completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information
as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure
according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes,design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town
applicable thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM
8:00 AM-4:00 PM.
Signature of Owner or Contractor Date
Print Name
combination permit_012811
� .
....�..................................x......,...........,,,,,.......,.,....,,,.....,...,........,...........,..,..........�,,,.,...,,.,.,,,,.....x.....,...�.,...,....,..........,..
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF
Permit#: B11-0215 Address: 1127 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL
Owner: HADLEY, PHILIP A. Location:
..............................»......,...........,.......,......,,.,....,........,....,.,.,,,..,,,.,,..,..,,,.,,....,......,...................,,,.,.......,,x,.......,.,...........,
Cond: 42
(BLDG 2009) CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS REQUIRED TO BE
INSTALLED PER 2009 IRC R315
Entry: 08/02/2013 By: JRM Action: AP
Cond: CON0012111
The applicant shall not use the neighbor's property for
access to the construction site. the limits of disturbance
fencing shall be closed on the north side of the property
to eliminate access to the neighbor's driveway.
Entry: 08/02/2013 By: JRM Action: AP
combination permit_012811
�
i
�
TOWN OF VA�L '
.,*************,***.********.,**.**********.**********************.********...***********.********�******************.****************.*****.**,*******
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES
Permit#: B11-0215 Address: 1127 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL
Owner: HADLEY, PHILIP A. Location:
,.*****.,«„**.,***************************.,**«.***********�****.,**.,**«„**,.*****.*******«„***.*******«*,.,.******.,*************,**«.,****.�******...*�**,,,,*.
Item: 00010 BLDG-FOOTING
09/14/2011 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Need
to see interior footings OK per SI report
10/26/2011 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: all
interior pads
08/02/2013 By: JRM Action: AP
Item: 00020 BLDG-Foundation/Steel
10/07/2011 By: JRM Action: AP
Item: 00021 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan
07/09/2013 By: Warren Action: AP
Item: 00022 PLAN-ILC FRAMING
07/09/2013 By: Warren Action: AP
Item: 00030 BLDG-Framing
03/01/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Roof
framing only ok per engineer letter
04/04/2012 By: sgremmer Action: DN Comments:
Framing complete and ok per engineer letter that is
scanned
Need to provide all SI reports
Need Framing ILC and Foundation ILC
Checked U-values on windows all OK
OK to insulate
11/16/2012 By: JRM Action: AP
Item: 00050 BLDG-Insulation
04/10/2012 By: JRM Action: PI Comments:
LOWER LEVEL ONLY
04/11/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP
Item: 00060 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail
04/13/2012 By: JRM Action: PI Comments:
LOWER LEVEL.... MECH ROOM AND ELEVATOR SHAFT ARE NOT
DONE. PARTIAL APPROVAL ON THE REST OF LOWER LEVEL OK
04/26/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP
Item: 00110 ELEC-Service
08/31/2012 By: nsc Action: AP Comments:
trench only
09/07/2012 By: nchand Action: AP
Item: 00120 ELEC-Rough
04/04/2012 By: sgremmer Action: DN Comments: No
bundling at panel in 2" hub
11/02/2012 By: sgremmerAction: AP
Item: 00190 ELEC-Final
11/06/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP
Item: 00200 MECH-Rough
11/03/2011 By: JRM Action: PI Comments:
INFLOOR HEAT SLAB 100#AIR TEST
03/29/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: all
duct work complete
combination permit_012811
04/03/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Two
main floor fireplaces ok, and the Flues for the down
stairs fireplaces. Still need to see the other
fireplaces put in place.
04/13/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: in
floor heat tested at 100psi
05/16/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: in
floor heat tested at 100 psi for the garage, upper
bedrooms, great room, kitchen, and mstr bed
07/19/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: all
patios
10/10/2012 By: JRM Action: AP Comments:
drive way snowmelt 100#air test
Item: 00210 PLMB-Underground
10/25/2011 By: sgremmer Action: AP
Item: 00220 PLMB-Rough/D.W.V.
03/21/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments:
tested at 5 psi
Item: 00230 PLMB-Rough/Water
03/21/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments:
tested at 100 psi
Item: 00240 PLMB-Gas Piping
03/21/2012 By: sgremmerAction: AP Comments: med
pressure gas tested at 60 psi
low pressure gas tested at 15 psi
Item: 00290 PLMB-Final
10/31/2012 By: sgremmer Action: DN Comments: 1.
Gas tags for meium pressure gas
2. Caulk all water closets
3. Hammer arrestors at all quick closing valves
11/16/2012 By: JRM Action: AP
Item: 00310 MECH-Heating
09/21/2012 By: mdenney Action: AP Comments:
patio snowmelt.
10/31/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: all
in floor heat
11/02/2012 By: sgremmerAction: AP
Item: 00390 MECH-Final
11/02/2012 By: sgremmerAction: AP
Item: 00530 BLDG-Temp. C/O
11/16/2012 By: JRM Action: AP Comments: TCO
APPROVED EXPIRES 7/31/13 LANDSCAPE AND SNOW CLIPS ,
GUARD AT TRASH ENTRY NEED TO BE COMPETED
Item: 00533 PLAN-TEMP. C/O
11/16/2012 By: Warren Action: AP Comments: A
DIA was recieved for all remaining work
Item: 00534 PLAN - FINAL C/O
07/09/2013 By: Warren Action: AP
Item: 00539 PW-FINAL C/O
11/09/2012 By: Is Action: AP
Item: 00540 BLDG-Final C/O
07/09/2013 By: JRM Action: AP
Item: 00090 BLDG-Final
01/02/2013 By: sgremmer Action: NO Comments:
Extended permit date from last inspection
08/02/2013 By: JRM Action: AP
combination permit_012811
�i
;��
'%��SUNDQUiST
D e s i g n G r a u p
STRUCTURAL EXPERTISE • PRACTICAL SOlUT10N5 �
FebTUary 29, 2oi2 �,
(�
Mr. Greg Sands F �
l '
Hermes Resort Properties
P.O. Box 2633
Edwards,Colorado 816g2
STRUCTURAL CONFORMANCE SUMMARY
Project Name: Hadley Residence i
ii2�Vail Valley Drive •Vail, Colorado
SDG Project Number: ii-oi�
Mr. Sands,
Representatives from our office have visited the project site as requested. The purpose of
this observation was to observe roof, wall, and floor framing conditions, as well as the
overall progress of the building.
In general,this observed framing work appeared to be in substantial conformance with the
Structural Documents anti design intent. In summary,we are satisfied with structural floor,
wall,and roof framing conditions for this building.
If you have any questions, piease feel free to contact our office. Thank you.
Report Submitted By:
SUNDQUIST DESIGN GROUP, INC. �!;,...t!c�
Residential Services Division o�';��Y4D s �''~�
c.�: �:o
15 �.
, . po,��. ���i� i:
Jose D. S � c�uist, P.E. �sip A����
��
- t7\conformance
v� �
��
�
West Slope Testing&Inspectian LLC Report#1
3177 Gl�nc�� Dr.
C�nc)Jun�c�tion,('.O R I:5�� PAge. 1 of 2
Phone: 97(}-4?4-G988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Inspection Report
D�te: 2 13 1�
C6ent: HP Geotech(Job#HP 111 062A)
Projeet:The Hadley Residence
Addre9s: 1127 Vail Valley Dr. Vail, CO
Buiidin� Permit No: B11-0215
General Con�raetor:Nermes Resort Properties
Contractor t6at Performed Work: J-8 Custom Fabrication & W�lding
In�tioi ofshop fabrication or field�rork at job site• Fietd
Report: V isually inspected & randomly tested for proper tightness the high
strength bohir.g at steel beam 8t colurnn connections main floor level framing.
Visually inspectzd fie]d welding at column to beam(tie.aring type cortnection)that
wati field wrleiCd in liCU uf L�c►lting witt� f71(et we[ds acruss iwc� sic�s af coluitui cap
plate tn}xatt�rn beam flange. Verifiead steel &ame details at main floor level
trani�ig.
The high strength bolting, field welding, and steel frame details inspected above
appeared to be in substantial confoimance vti•ith the plansldetails,, and the quality
requirernents of the A�VS Dl.l Structural Welding Cade& the RCSC
Specification far Structural loints Using ASTM A325 or A49p gatts except�s
noted below.
1)Noticad ane of t.ha .1325 bolt� ut thz steel beum connect�on Garnge area
WI Qx39 to WlOx30 was approximately 3;8" to !/�"short subsequeniiy fu11 nut
engagement could�c�t be obtained.
2 j Veri fy that the structural engineer is ok wyth steel beam to column connection
ihat had been field we'_dzd in lieu of bolting.
3)Nouced beam web stiffener plates where offapproximately 11" from cenler of
supporting coh�mr► main level fiaming bela�v Sr�dy�T-�ll�•ay area.
3)Makr surC �lruclural c��;uic�r w�w uk witli Ix�uu�;at sG�c;l l�atu to wuLr�
wal I & wcx�d pc�st connecticros, as it appeau�ed that in some locations beams where
bearing�m a cambination of v�•oad rim boards& steel shims ai tops of concrete
wall� 8c varies sizes of steel shims had been used at sc}me of wood p�st
CO[lI1CCt10II5.
�
�p.
€
�
Yage 2 af 2
�)All thaugh it was not pari af my special inspection duties. It appeared that sume
woad posts needed installed underneath the end of steel beam main letirel Eraming
helow Master Suite araa.
Greg with Hemies Resort Properties was made aware of these discrepancies& was
aoing to discuss them with t6e strucnual engineer.
tncpector/i'eehniciSn: T)ni3gla.Q R Yrnrn�
�n sso�o+
OC1 EXP �/ /201a
�� � - �a �s
H� 5020 County Road 154
� Glenwood Springs,CO 81601
Phone:9T0-945-7988
Fax:970-945-8454
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL hpqeo(aahppeotech.com
REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT �
Client: Hermes Resort Properties Job No.: 111 062A Day: Tuesday
Greg Sands Date: 10-04-11
P.O. Box 2633 Page: 1 of 1
Edwards, Colorado 816321 ',
Project: Hadley Residence, Lot 11, Block 6, Vail Valley 1St Filing, 1127 Vail Valley Drive, Vail,
Colorado
Area of Inspection: West tall foundation walls and Southwest tall foundation wall
Reference Dacuments 1 S3.1, 3 S3.1, 5 S3.1, 15 S 3.0, 3 S3.0, 14 S 3.0, 12 S 3.0, 13 S 3.0, 10 S 3.0
Used: of Sundquist Engineering's structural plans
Inspection Status: ❑ Preliminary � Final
� Concrete reinforcement as noted above was judged to be in reasonable conformance with the
referenced construction documents.
❑ Exceptions Noted: SE wall not complete at time of visit
Verbal Greg advised
Communication:
Distribution:
Hermes Resort Properties—Greg Sands (qsands(c�hermesresortproperties.com)
�SW Joe Benedict David A. Young, P.E.
Field Technician Reviewed By
;
� � � �:c; ��:, �! � �v� �� ;
�I OCT 12 ��11 �
�I.l ;
T�'J1�IN �F �/AIL '
31 �-oa ��
H� 5020 County Road 154
� Glenwood Springs,CO 81601
Phone: 970-945-7988
Fax:970-945-8454
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL hpqeoCa�hpgeotech.com
REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT
Client: Hermes Resort Properties Job No.: 111 062A Day: Wednesday
Greg Sands Date: 10-05-11
P.O. Box 2633 Page: 1 of 1
Edwards, Colorado 816321
Project: Hadley Residence, Lot 11, Block 6, Vail Valley 15t Filing, 1127 Vail Valley Drive, Vail,
Colorado
Area of Inspection: Southeast tall foundation wall; and rebar tie-in into boulder for footing
Reference Documents 11 S 3.0, 15 S3.0; and Sundquist Engineering stamped memo dated
Used: 09/15/11 for the footing tie-in into the boulder. Drill holes wera bout 12
inches into boulder.
Inspection Status: ❑ Preliminary � Final
� Concrete reinforcement as noted above was judged to be in reasonable conformance with the
referenced construction documents.
❑ Exceptions Noted:
Verbal
Communication:
Distribution:
Hermes Resort Properties—Greg Sand (gsands(a�hermesresortproperties.com)
Joe Benedict David A. Young, P.E.
Field Technician Reviewed By
Iksw
� � � JU � ���
� D � C LL� �_i-
�I , � ,.
';I�`, OCT 1 � �Ja� �
�
_ C
���JWN C)F VAIL J
t -t�� ��
H� 5020 County Road 154
� Glenwood Springs,CO 81601
Phone: 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8454
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL hqqeoCa)hpqeotech.com
REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT
Client: Hermes Resort Properties Job No.: 111 062A Day: Friday
Greg Sands �ate: 09-30-11
P.O. Box 2633 Page: 1 of 1
Edwards, Colorado 816321
Project: Hadley Residence, lot 11, Block 6, Vail Valley 15� Filing, 1127 Vail Valley Drive, Vail,
Colorado
Area of Inspection: North and east short walls, southwest tall wall
Reference Documents details 2S3.1,6S3.0,7S3.O,and 8S3.0 of Sundquist Engineering structural
Used: plans
Inspection Status: � Preliminary ❑ Final
� Concrete reinforcement as noted above was judged to be in reasonable conformance with the
referenced construction documents.
❑ Exceptions Noted:
Verbal Concrete foreman advised
Communication:
Distribution:
Hermes Resort Properties—Greg Sands Iqsands(a�hermesresortproperties.com)
Joe Benedict David A. Young, P.E.
Field Technician Reviewed By
lksw
. _...��:______
.,;� I� l� I� (l \�� C� �-�i.
J�
OCT 12 C���I ;
���!��i :
. :
_ �OWN OF VAIL �
�� l -�a15
H 5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs,CO 81601
Phone:970-945-7988
Fax:970-945-8454
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL hpgeo@hpgeotech.com
CONCRETE TEST REPORT
Hermes Resort Properties Job No. 111 062A
Attn: Greg Sands Date Cast: 09-14-11
P.O. Box 2633
Edwards, Colorado 81632 Sheet: 1 of 1
Project: Hadley Residence, Lot 11, Block 6, Vail Valley 1S� Filing, 1127 Vail Valley Drive, Vail,
Colorado
Placement Location: Residence Footings
Supplier: LaFarge Time Batched: 1:03pm Load Size (Yds): 10
Truck No: 4780728 Time Arrived: 2:15pm Yds Delivered: 10
Ticket No: 8584618 Time Placed: 2:25pm Yds Ordered: 30
Mix Design: RMXUV309D9V Ultra
vertical 3030
Method of Placement: Pump Sample Point: Truck discharge
Time Sampled: 2:30pm Slump: 3'/. inches
Air Temp: 58° Air Content: 2.5 %
Concrete Temp: 73° Wet Unit Wt: 150.3 pcf
Water Added: 9 gallons
Communication: The Contractor and Supplier were informed of our field test results.
Time Cylinders Cast:
Initial Cure: Field Field Storage: Bucket
Date Stripped: Cyl Temp at Pick Up: ° Min/Max: °/°
Compressive Strength Data
2011 Compressive 2g Da
Lab Age Load Diameter Area Y
Number Days Date Ibs. in. �n2 Strength (psi) qvg. (psi)
742A 7 09-21-11 43,300 4.09 12.63 3430
7426 28 10-12-11
742C 28 10-12-11
742D 56 91-09-11
Specified Strength: 3,000 psi at 28 days
Notes:
Distribution: Greg Sands—(gsands@hermesgrp.com)
li� IC i1 � \\J] � � � ;
�,� ��- ���� � L'�. I� ,� ' !� ,
; �s Joe Benedict David A. Young, P.E.
' �� OCT 12 2U11 I� Field Technician Reviewed By
;j���, i;
��19 ' TOWN OF VAIL r
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
,.
�o�rno�u�; ,.
Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149
COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Permit #: B11-0215
Project #: PRJ11-0110
Job Address: 1127 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL Applied.....: 07/15/2011
Location......: Issued... : 08/31/2011
Parcel No....; 210109205003
OWNER HADLEY, PHILIP A. 07/15/2011
61 DAWN HARBOR LN
RIVERSIDE
CT 06878
APPLICANT HERMES MOUNTAtN CLASSICS LLC 07/15/2011 Phone: 970-926-1720
RICK HERMES
PO BOX 2633
EDWARDS
CO 81632
License:C000003225
CONTRACTOR HERMES MOUNTAIN CLASSICS LLC 07/15/2011 Phone:970-926-1720
RICK HERMES
PO BOX 2633
EDWARDS
CO 81632
License: C000003225
Description:
NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Occupancy: R-3 Type Construction: VB Valuation: $2,062,000.00
.................,,.,.,...,....,,..........,..,....,,,...,,......».»....,..,.».....,,.,, FEE SUMMARY ,,.,,,......,,..............,....,.....,,..,,......,...,,,.......,,,,...,...,......
Building Permit-----------> $9,485.05 Bldg Plan Check----------> $6,165.28 Use Tax Fee-----------------------> $41,040.00
Electrical Permit---------> $943.00 Elec Plan Check-----------> $612.95 Restuarant Plan Review--------> $0.00
Mechanical Permit------> $2,340.00 Mech Plan Check---------> $585.00 Additional Fees--------------------> $0.00
Plumbing Permit--------> $915.00 Plmb Plan Check---------> $228.75 Recreation Fee--------------------> $1,230.00
Investigation-----------------------> $0.00
Will Call------------------------------> $20.00
TOTAL PERMIT FEES-------------> $63,565.03
Payments------------------------------> $63,565.03
BALANCE DUE-----------------------> $0.00
x�f*1'ff4R4irrtrt�LLMiti!#LL�RL4rtf*rtR4Rit�kfl`1�feRirir�/tA44Y`fhMYrkrttr�k##YeYrY'4rti1'Ntrt4Yr#'#'wkiP*4kYeir�4ftXx4wf*:�ttrMA*++R*helrwR*Yrf(RkR*tffft�F**LfL1`A441`1«i(ili�4�k4#�i(rtfflrkY'fYIY'trh�khthYert9*#R*wt`1`1`4ie#1`444iF#f44ARilirk
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out in full the information required,completed an accurate plot plan,and state that all the information
as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure
according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes,design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town
applicable thereto.
REQUESTS R INSP C N SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM
8:00 AM :00 PM.
g•31 • 1 �
e of Own r or Contracto Date
rint Name
combination permit_012811
,
!
��11M V��1'1!L •
.............................................................................x.�.,.......,.,...................,.......,,..,......,.......,.....................,..,..,.......,......
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF
Permit#: 611-0215 Address: 1127 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL
Owner: HADLEY, PHILIP A. Location:
.................................................................................................................................x..,......,.....,.,,...r..........,,.........,,,,,..
Cond: 42
(BLDG 2009) CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS REQUIRED TO BE
INSTALLED PER 2009 IRC R315
Cond: CON0012111
The applicant shall not use the neighbor's property for
access to the construction site. the limits of disturbance
fencing shall be closed on the north side of the property
to eliminate access to the neighbor's driveway.
combination permit_012811
,'
T�WN OF VAII, '
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUS
Inspection Sign Off with Comments:
Item: 00010 BLDG-FOOTING
09/14/2011 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Need
to see interior footings OK per SI report
10/26/2011 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: all
interior pads
Item: 00020 BLDG-Foundation/Steel
10/07/2011 By: JRM Action: AP
Item: 00021 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan
Item: 00022 PLAN-ILC FRAMING
Item: 00030 BLDG-Framing
Item: 00050 BLDG-Insulation
Item: 00060 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail
Item: 00070 BLDG-Misc.
Item: 00110 ELEC-Service
Item: 00120 ELEC-Rough
Item: 00140 ELEC-Misc.
Item: 00190 ELEC-Final
Item: 00200 MECH-Rough
Item: 00210 PLMB-Underground
10/25/2011 By: sgremmer Action: AP
Item: 00220 PLMB-Rough/D.W.V.
Item: 00224 FIRE-ALARM ROUGH
Item: 00225 FIRE-SPRINKLER ROUGH
Item: 00227 MISC - FIRE
Item: 00228 FIRE - Final
Item: 00230 PLMB-Rough/Water
Item: 00240 PLMB-Gas Piping
Item: 00260 PLMB-Misc.
Item: 00290 PLMB-Final
Item: 00310 MECH-Heating
Item: 00315 PLMB-Gas Piping
Item: 00320 MECH-Exhaust Hoods
Item: 00330 MECH-Supply Air
Item: 00340 MECH-Misc.
Item: 00390 MECH-Final
Item: 00410 Special Inspect-progress rept
Item: 00420 Special Inspect-final rept
Item: 00530 BLDG-Temp. C/O
Item: 00532 PW-TEMP. C/O
Item: 00533 PLAN-TEMP. C/O
Item: 00534 PLAN - FINAL C/O
Item: 00538 FIRE-FINAL C/O
Item: 00539 PW-FINAL C/O
Item: 00540 BLDG-Final C/O
1
�
�o�aFV,�` '
.****.,****************.....*�,***********************,*******..*.****************,*.***********.******.,*****.*.***,****�****�************.****...***
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES
Permit#: 611-0215 Address: 1127 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL
Owner: HADLEY, PHILIP A. Location:
*«*«*,,,�*****���****«*««««««*«***************««„««*«*************««******************«***««*«************««**„***«**««*********�***«****„*********.,,**
Item: 00090 BLDG-Final
combination permit_012811
************************************++************************+*****************************
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement
***********************�*+*****************************+**********+*************+****�******
Statement Number: R110001114 Amount: $57,399.6208/31/201101:50 PM
Payment Method: Check Init: SAB
Notation: HERMES
MOUNTAIN CLASSICS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permit No: B11-0215 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT
Parcel No: 2101-092-0500-3
Site Address: 1127 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL
Location:
Total Fees: $63, 565.03
This Payment: $57,399.62 Total ALL Pmts: $63, 565.03
Balance: $0.00
******+***+********�**+********************+**************************************+*********
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Current Pmts
-------------------- ------------------------------ ------------
BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 9,485.05
EP 00100003111100 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 943 .00
MP 00100003111100 MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES 2,340.00
PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 1,426.57
PP 00100003111100 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES 915.00
RF 11100003112700 RECREATION FEES 1,230.00
UT 11000003106000 USE TAX 4� 41, 040.00
WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 20.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Job Name:�Pr���'i �I t?
_ i .Iob Address: 112:-1�t�.l�V��`1 De
���� + Pertnit No.: Bl��O'Z''t 5
SPECIAL INSPECTION ANR TESTIN6 AGREEMENT
(To applicants of projects tequiring Specia!tnspection ot Testing per Section 1T01 of the!BC)
The owner o►hislher representative, on the advice of the design professional in responsible cha►ge, sha!{
camptete, seal, sign and submR a copy of the Speciai Inspect(on Agreement �d Structurai Tests
Scheduled to the Town of Vail far review and approval. Signatures are required on both pages;
photacopied or faxed signat�res are acceptable.
The owner and his/her general Ccsnb-actor, where appiicable, shai( also acknowledge the following
conditions appiicable to 3peciai Inspection Testing:
1. Contractor Is responsibie for proper not�cation to the Inspection or Testing agency for items
ii�ced.�Pe�e�� tiac ��oa�
2. Onfy the tesfing laboratory should take samples and transpoR them to their laboratory.
3. Capies of an laboratory reports and inspections are to be serrt direcUy to the Town of Vaii by the Testing
agency on a weekty basis.
4. Inspection egency to submit names and quatificaUons of on-site spacial inspectors to the Town ot Vail
for review end approval.{Page 2)
5. The speciel inspedor is cesponstble to immediately notify the Town of Vaii Building Official in writing of
any cancerns and/or problems encountered.
6. It is the responsibility of the contractor to review the Town of Vail approved plans for additiona�
inspection or testi�g requirements ihat may 6e noted. A pre-construdion conierence at the job site is
recommended to revisw special inspection procedures.
7. The special inspector shaN use only the Tawn of Vail epproved drawings.
8. Ail special ins�ctlon fleld �eports must be left on site for review by the Tovon of Vaii staff prior to
required irupections or re-inspections.
BEFORE OGCUPANCY WILL BE GRANTED: The special inspection agency shall submit a signed and
sealed statement that al!items requiring testing and inspection were fulfilled and reported. Those items not
tested and/or inspected shall be noied in this statement. A copy of the statement shall be maintained at the
job site for the Building Inspectar's r ew prior to final inspection.
Acknowle �
. � lftc.� :.� c'�3� ��
_._.._....__..�— S�g�. e '—"' Print Name Dats
1 �
Speciallnsp� io�h �/1 'J_
qgency. �i.�shl.. 4 �+ -� G--f'tiT�'G�, f . �/�� � ?u �'�"1
' atu � PrintName--i� _ Date
Project � LOe.�",•k. 'hj. �� U�r .�1'".� �'�?_;,�9 �
Arch/E� ...s_,.. �W�...�.�,.�.�._ �
� Pri�t Mame Date
�- . - C��, �a q �-z9J.1..
cantractor:
nature 'nt Name Oate
"�_
�
.
�IWNUPVAIL � 3PECIAL INSpEG hl AND TESTING SGHEDULE
(;�iC 1TOa}
Project Name: Fermii# b Z-�l'S
Owner's Name: � 1itc.t t I� C�'� `�(3( � <<
Testine insp r s�8� PrintName Dato
Agency:_,�.�' . � ����G�l� c�,��d ►'� L �`-' ---...—_-=�
7esting Inspection / n ra PdMName �a�e
Hereby certifles fhat the Tlesting/lnspection Agency named a6ove has been engaped to perform structural tests and
inspections during oonstruction as checked betaw,to safisfy all applicabie portiorts of the Buiiding Code.
Prtor to final inspectlon, the Inspeciion Agency shal!submit a statement that all items of designated work performed
were teported. Any items checked but not tested or inspected will be noted and explained. Wfienever any designated
items on the list are ready tor sampiing,testing, or inspectian,it shatl be tfie responsibility of the contractor ta give
timely notice to the lnspection agency so that the required servicea may be performed.
REINFORCtNG STE@L: UNDERPINNING:
� Tensile 8 Send,one set per heat per�tons � Temporary/Permanen!
InspeCtion ot Alecement lnspecflon ot Stee1 Fabrlcatlon
� lnapectlon ai Welding � Inspecdon ot Relnforcing 3 Fortns
_ EPo� �„ Inspection of ConcreEe Placement
� lnspection of Tiebacks
MI4SOkRY:
, Prelim.Acceptsnce Testa(Masonry Units,Wali Prismz} SOlI NNLS:
_ Subsequent Tests(h�ortar,Grout.Fietd WaA Prisms) _ Temporary Shoring
� InspecUon at Placement artd Groutlng � Pertnanent Wall
CONCRET SHOTCRETE GROUT AND MORTAR: STRUCTURAL STEEL:
Convele Shot Grout Morfar ____._ Semple&Test(List specNic members bebw)
Agprepata tasts hx design �� Shop identification 8c Weldina Inspectlon
uita6 ity�ayprogdoa Shop Uitrasonlc Inapectlon
I�Yuc Des+�ns �Shop Ratllography
Tesf Panel Field Wfllding Inapectfon
Batch Plent Inspeetlon Field 8o(ing InspecUon
Cement Qrab Sample __ F��d UltfeSOnIC Inspectlon
�n�q���9 ,_,_ Field RaQiography
Cornproaa'an Tosta — Meta{4eek Welding Inspeetion
Cast SpecMens FIREPROOFING:
Pido-up Samples Enspection&Placement
ShriNcage n '—`—
Yfetd[rinck SO{
NrCheck Acceptance Tesis
Dry Unit Wei9h� _ Mois�re•Oenslty Determfnafion
PRECAST CONCRETE: _ Fitld Denaity
Reinforcing Tests Drilled Piers
� InspectlonotReinfotcing Pfacement _ Deep Foundafion
T Tendon?ests
_ Inapeotlan of Tendon Pfacement STRUCTURAL WOOD:
" Inspection at Concrete Piacemeni _ Inspection of FebticaUon
�„ Inspection o(Concrete 9at�hing _ Inspecdon ot Truss Joint Fabrication
, Inspection of Parsel Attachment 8 Inserts � Sample 3 Test Compo�ents
, Compression Tests _ Inspection of C31u Lam Fabrication
Inspection M StressingR'rensfer
SMOKE CaNTROL:
PfLiHG,CAlSSONS,CAPS,TIES:
Inspecbon oi Reintorcing Placement _ SPECIAL CASES:
� Inspectiorc ot Concrete Placement
� Inspeetlon of Concrete Batchtng SPEClAL lMSPECTION:
_ Selsmic Resisiance
Specify ofhertesfs,irtspections orspeclal rRStructkns r8qulmd. ____, Wind Requlrements
-4-
K
. �,
,�� ,.��,� r�
�
'!i!� � i�t �r+�,�+
�V i7 .����7 1
tD s s i g t� fi r � u p
STRUCTURAL EXPERTISE•PRACT1CAl SOWTIONS �
TRANSMITTAL
TO: FROM:
Mr.Greg Sands Joe Sundquist,P.E. ,
COMPANY: DATE:
Hermes Group 9/i5/2oii
FAX NL'MBER: TOTAL NO.OF PAGES:
(970)926-i739 T�vo,Including Cover Sheet i
PHONE NUMBER: SUNDQUIST DESIGN GROUP PROJECT NO.:
�970)926-9344 ii-oi�
OTHER: RE:
www.hermesgrp.com Hadley Residence
❑URGENT FOR REVIEW ❑PLEASE REPLY/COMMENT (�NO REPLY REQUIRED
NOTES/COMMENTS:
GI'Cg�
Please see the attached sheet with foundation revisions/approval,as requested.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Thank You,
t��`'����c'�,
Jae Sun quist,P.E. p�. �. .- �,,,�'.�'dp�
.� t3�'ie'�
,`� `"15 �,':
��,���._ f �r��
��� r��,{.
� �. �
��
� ..
vs
Post Office Box 6�6 p � � a � �
Conifer, Colorado 80433
�303) $38-zz22 phone ��� 2
�3o3) 648-4464 fax � ZQ'�,
www.sundquistdesign.com
TOW� OF �AIL
� H �_��, ����� ����,�,,��: ,����,,_���,�<< ,� ,� �
�'��� �li:��C;uuuty Roa�l li�}
Glenwood Springs,Colorado 41601
Phone:970-94�-7988
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL F,�,�:n7o-945-8454
��n,�,,il� h�„_,�.,,�r���,����,,t��I.i ,�„�n
September 12, 2011 � � � � M �
Hermes Resort Properties D
Attn: Greg Sands SEP 2 � 2���
P. O. Box 2633
Edwards, Colorado 81632 TOWN C)� VAIL
gsands@hermesgrp.co m
Job No. 111 062A
Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Hadley Residence, Lot 11, Block 6,
Vail Village lst Filing, 1127 Vail Valley Drive, Vail, Colorado
Dear Greg:
As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Fawlak Geotechnical, Iiic. observed the
excavation at the subject site on September 6, 8 and 9, 20ll to evaluate the soils exposed
for foundation support. The fmdings of our observations and recommendations for the
foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study
for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated Apri128,
2011, Job No. 111 062A.
The proposed construction is similar to that discussed in our previous report. Spread
footings designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf.
On September 6 and 8 the excavation was underway with primarily sand and gravel with
cobble soils being encountered. At the time of our September 9 visit, the foundation
excavation was essentially complete and had been cut in multiple levels from about 5 to
11 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the
excavation consisted primarily of inedium dense, silty sand and gravel with cobbles and
occasional boulders. In a limited area of the southeast corner of the excavation, medium
dense slightly silty(coarse) sand was exposed at subgade. Results of swell-consolidation
testing performed on a sample of the slightly silty sand taken from the site, shown on
Figure 1, indicate the soils are slightly compressible under conditions of loading and
wetting. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were typically
slightly moist.
The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously
encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the
recommended allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Loose and disturbed soils should
be removed in the footing areas to expose the undisturbed natural granular soils and the
subgrade compacted. In the proposed (heated) driveway area, about 4 feet of dark silty
sand with gravel fill was exposed. We recommend the existing fill in the driveway be
subexcavated and at least 2 feet of the on-site sand and gravel soils compacted to at least
Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989
� Hermes Resort Properties
September 12, 2011
Page 2
95% standard Proctor density be provided for support of the driveway slab. Other
recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be
observed.
The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils
exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous (limited) subsurface
exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation
could increase the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations
encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations
contained in this letter.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH— PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
,���taa�R�c e�,���
r.�� •(/�'��p��� t �
� v � Y��1 �i
a G o.A d .` s
� . : �..
David A. Young, P. E.� ��� p s �
:: �; 32-2is :�;
:���'. �'��3-/( r� .
DAY/1' �'.�Fii's•••....•�'••��•���:
Jg �,�s�,p��4�1`�`v
attachments: Figure 1, Swell-Consolidation Test Results
p � � � od �
sE� 2 � zo»
TOWN O� VAIL
Job No. 111 062A
c�Ot@CF1
Moisture Content = 7.2 percent
Dry Density = 93 pcf
' Sample of: Slightly Silty Sand
From: Bottom of SE Portion of Excavation,09-06-11
No Movement
upon wetting
0
1
�
0
z 2
O ,
�
�
� 3
a
�
O
U 4
5
� � � � \J 5
�EP 2 j ZO�i
.� TC�WI�+��.��i� n_--_-�
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE (ksf)
H
111 062A ��P't�}'� SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 1
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
H 5020 County Road 154
�� Glenwood Springs,CO 81601
Phone:9T0-945-7988
Fax:970-945-8454
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAI hrx�eo�hps�eotech.com
REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT
Client: Hermes Resort Properties Job No.: 111 062A Day: Wednesday
Attn: Greg Sands Date: 9/16111
P.O. Box 2633 Page: 1 of 1
Edwards, Colorado 81632
Project: Hadley Residence, Lot 11, Block 6, Vail Valiey 1�Filing, 1127 Vaii Valiey Drive, Vaii,
Colorado
Area of inspection: Residence Footings
Reference Documents S2.0 and S3.0 by Sunquist Engineering
Used:
Inspection Notes: Some footing areas do not have reinforcement as shown on the
structural drawings.
Inspection Status: ❑ Preliminary � Final
� Concrete reinforcement as noted above was judged to be in reasonable conformance with
the refe�enced construction documents.
❑ Exceptions Noted:
Verbal Greg Sands was advised of ou� inspection results
Communication:
Distribution:
Hermes Resort Properties—Greg Sands(gsands�hemtesaro.com j
p � � � odc�
Joe Benedict David A. Young, P.E.
SE� 2 � 2011 Field Technician Reviewed By
/ksw
TOWN OF VAIL
.
' � i y�
4 I I'-qM,�° 4'-2Y2'
2' ------------- 15'-4"�
� 68' - 8 l/8'
41 6 � T.D. 5LA8
` �A __.________..
�+ ,-----�---- —
o � � I �
m � ' � t�o� s
ss.o '" � --- -
TA.W. Q ---t------ -
e�� - 8 „8• •� �} i
STEP �
'T.O.F. ' ;� � I
ti
� � � �
�N,, • �j�� , \�'i �1 � �
ti • ' ,4�r�'.'�' �STEP `'� T A.F. � -1 53A
4 �� �, o�+- r.o.w. ' es� - e�p I
� OM �
���� , � �
; 7� v`:. �. ' r.o,w. � ,
-��<� � � �` y� � 88' - O T/b' S'-4°
� �1„_,/ �,tr�w 53A _�
� ��� � �, 12 t2
�°�
� � �t�� �����;�� ��t'�-.
�
O �'°`-"��` � ''�'`��� -�=
, TA. �
- z ��.-� ��� �
4 � p �
m � �. ,
, �— — -- —�, ; ----
1�� � ``r
� �� � �A 53A �+A"'�'�1�{ ,}•� �
i� �
� 53A � ^�,.
B
TQ —————— ——— ————
� �/
I
--°---• 53.0 {85'� 4") �ib
��, J
53A �
�
T.O.F. �–, (
� �2� ' � m �
� T.OJ^i. i T.O.W.
. STEP i q?' - 10'
�� T.O.W. NpTE 5 !
�
5TEf7 STEfi' '� � �✓1
TA.F. T.OJ^I.'`, ` 53.1 ,` j T.0
� � � �
D • .�__,..,.
SEP 2 1 2011 �� , q
T.O.W. � 6�'�`.
q8' - 8 8` 3 +�
TOWN OF VAIL �.�
TA.F.
0 84' - ' .
�
�� � �� � _ ;� °���� � Department,of Community Developmen� `
'��� � ���"� _, .� ��� �` �,� � 75 South Frontage Ro�d :
� , �a� °�'�� �� � '�-'� � Va�l, C¢lora�o 8�65���'
��� - i� _ ,� � � �'� �:�:;� ��-3 x ��i. '� ��-`'Tel 970-479 2�'2�"�
*�;���`` ��;��� �� ������ � � -- Faic,�97�-47'3 �4��3
���&� ,�,Y� T °�-� £������� � � f, _ ; �INeb wwinr va�#gov�rc�i ;�
�.. ' ='� ¢ * :;��� � `� � . �
� ,� � -- � De�ce�ap�nenf�evtei�r �o rdtnat°
��-"���,'3'< 3z ���FJ � '�' �ti^� .� P�r "' � �o�` �� � ����'
>''i.w'.s..��.#.,�?�...�`j�'^+" ... . .. . ._ ..sds� ��/'. �`F � .���,.� .�;z���_�..�.�����
TRANSMITTAL FORM
Revision Submittals:
1. "Field SeY'of approved plans MUST accompany revisions.
2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved&the permit is re-issued.
3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55.00 per hour(2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance.
_ __.__. __.___ _____�__._.�. _W�__.______ _ __. _.__._______� �._ _��_ __ ..w..._ _ .____.___ . __W__.��v_..�..v__.___,__� �_____ .�.._...._.
Permit#(s)information applies to: Attention: ( ) Revisions
(-�j'�2g�ponse to Correction Letter
� �� � � �� �,� �t .� �attached copy of correction letter
� ( ) Deferred Submittal
� ( )Other
; _R..n��r_.�,,....�.����,,...�.�,�,�..m a�.._ �x �._. ���n .�..Q.m.�.� w_.�..w._.��_ a..���,,,�....�. �,�.,�.a.�.._,,...�...,w .�
!Project Street Address. �
±i � a7 va,� �,� - _ �l � a Description/List of Changes:
�.�..� n
E(Number) (Street) (Suite#) �CSP(�1SE.1° l OQ�.E C_Tl O.JS
�Building/Complex Name: �f�t1t 1��( �� ,
i �
�.w�_��-�..�,ti�s_,�,.��
;Contact Information;�������V� ��� _ � „ ���� ����,�.������
�Company: �E{ZM�� ��l.U�jA��.► l,LftiS51CS �-�
`Companv A�+�+�ess:_ � �DX ��3�,.. .. � � �
i • �
€ � .
'City:_E����DS�_ State: �O Zip� �� � #
; ,
;Contact Name: ��C,K �E�IYIES �
�Contact Phone: � r�(p��,�(p�,� �
[E-Mail 4eQnc�,.S� �p�MeS��q��. C.�M � _
� � �
� i
� � i
�a....«�,�,,, `
....��.x,..W,......�ro,.�,,..d...,..»�.,....:.,-�,... r...�,..,n,,..�... .- .....,..,...>.. -.,:,._..u...-_:....n..«d.�.�..,..»,<_...«...,..r-....,.,.. .::,,,._-.- �
!
t e
€Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations(Labor 8�Materials)
�(DO NOT include original valuation) `
�
� Building: $ �(use additional sheet if necessary)
� _ __ __ _ _ __. _ ;
!Plumbing: $
; `Date Received: (� � � � n/7 �
_, Electncal: $ ; D LS V
Y
;Mechanical: $ ',� AUG � l 20��
'Total: $ i
; ;
_�._�___.__,_._..______� ___._._.._..__ ___.___.__�J TUWN OF VAIL
O1-Jan-l0
�
Date: August 16, 2011
Re: 1127 Vail Valley Drive/B 11-0215; Permit Response
s
Mr. Haeberle, +r
Please accept this letter as response to the Building Permit Comments dated August 16,
2011 for the Hadley Residence (1127 Vail Valley DriveBl 1-0215).
Included in this response are three revised full sets and written responses from Resort
Custom Homes (architecture), Sundquist Design Group (structural engineer), Boundaries
Unlimited Inc. (civil engineer).
Architectural Comments
Revised sheets included in new plan set. See response letter from Resort Custom Homes
dated August St�, 2011.
Structural Comments
Revised sheets included in new plan set. See response letter from Sundquist Design
Group dated August 5`h, 2011.
Civil Comments
Revised sheets included in new plan set. See response letter from Boundaries Unlimited
dated August 4�h,2011.
Mechanical Comments
Revised mechanical sheets included in new plan set reflect the following.
1 - Plans to reflect the required listing and or engineer design for the proposed chimney
cap.
Response: The infarmation will be submitted by the fireplace contractor prior to install.
2 - Annotate on plans the efficiency of the furnace and boilers.
Response: A note was added stating min efficiency is 92%.
3 - Indicate if the kitchen hood exceeds 400 cfm. If so, show the required makeup air.
Response: Makeup air will be needed as the hood exceeds 400 cfm, plans state as such.
0105 Edwards Village Bh�d.#G-107 � PO Box 2633 � Edwards,CO 81632 � P 970.926.1720 � F 970.926.1739
Electrical Comments
1 -Annotate on the plans the 50% high efficacy requirement per the IECC.
Response: A note has been added to each electrical sheet
2 - Clearly identify location and size of all panel boards on the plans. See Town of Vail
submittal requirements.
Response: The electrical sheets have been revised to show requested information.
Other
ILC signed and sealed plans included
Revised electrical load calculations included
Energy a sessment form included
reg Sands
Project Manager
Hermes Group
0105 Edwards Village Blvd.#G-107 � PO Box 2633 � Edwards,CO 81632 � P 970.926.1720 � F 970.926.1739
TOWN OF VAIL �
75 South Frontage Road West Community Development Department
Vail, Colorado 81657 970.479.2138
vailgov.com 970.479.2452 fax I
Date: August 1, 2011
Re: 1127 Vail Valley Drive/ B11-0215
Dear Mr Sands,
RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS
• Submit three complete sets of revised construction documents containing the
requested information with all plan revision items clouded or otherwise identified.
• Please respond in writing to each comment with a response letter addressing
each comment.
BUILDING COMMENTS
Architectural Comments:
Sheet T1
1. Revise plans to reflect all insulation and fenestration requirements as per Table
402.1.1 IECC as amended by the Town of Vail.
Sheet T3
1. Automatic fire protection systems to be installed per Town of Vail Fire Code
Sheet T4
1. Provide plans and specifications for the required radon system as adopted by the
Town of Vail. See Appendix F of the IRC.
2. Revise plans to reflect the IBC for all structural elements of the building as adopted
by the Town of Vail.
C 1/C2
1. Plans to be sealed and signed by the registrant per the State of Colorado technical
registration rules.
2. It appears a surcharge is being imposed on the stone walls at the corner of the spa.
Please clarify
3. Show on plans utility locations and building sewer. Include upstream manhole rim
elevation for determination of the need for a backwater valve.
4. Show foundation drain termination points.
I LC ',
1. Plans to be sealed and signed by the registrant per State of Colorado. ��,
Sheet A2.0
1. Provide plans for the proposed pool and spa to include barrier and insulated cover
criteria per the IECC.
Sheet A2.1
1. Indicate the required one hour separation in garage to include structural support
members.
2. Clarify if future elevator is with in the scope of this project.
Sheet A5.0
1. Provide a cross-sectional detail of the proposed stairs clearly identifying (detailing)
rise and run, handrails and guardrails.
Sheet A5.2
1. Details do not reflect required weather protection and insulation at basement walls.
Revise plans
2. Show how the stone veneer is to be supported Iaterally.R703.7 IRC
3. How is moisture on back side of the stone veneer to be weeped from the wall?
R703.1.1 IRC
Sheet A8.0
1. Annotate on the plans the u values for the windows as per Table 402.1.1 IECC as
amended by the Town of Vail. Note the maximum of .30 u value is allowed.
Electrical load calculations
1. Submitted load calculations do not include the future elevator nor the large amount of
heat tape being proposed. Revise calculations
Structural Comments:
General
1. Provide structural details for the proposed stairs
2. Provide structural plans for the proposed pool and spas
Sheet S1
1. List required special inspections and submit special inspection agreement with
resubmittal.
Sheet S2.2
1. The Town of Vail does not use the structural provisions of the IRC. The IBC is to be
used. Revise plans to reflect the IBC.
Sheet S3.0
Town of Vail Page2
1. Stone veneer design over 30 feet to be designed for attachment and support.
Sheet S3.1 ,
1. Is detail 9 to be field welded? Please clarify �I
Plumbing Comments:
1. See Civil plans comments for building sewer
Mechanical Comments:
Sheet A5.2
1. Plans to reflect the required listing and or engineer design for the proposed chimney
cap.
Sheet M-1
1. Annotate on plans the efficiency of the furnace and boilers. Note a minimum of 92%
efficiency required.
Sheet M-2
1. Indicate if the kitchen hood exceeds 400 cfm. If so, show the required makeup air.
Reference section 505.2 IMC
Electrical Comments:
Sheet AE2.0/AE2.1
1. Annotate on the plans the 50% high efficacy requirement per the IECC
2. Clearly identify location and size of all panelboards on the plans. See Town of Vail
submittal requirements.
3.
PLANNING COMMENTS
Approval conditional on submittal of approval letter to use access easement for
construction purposes.
FIRE COMMENTS
Contact Mike Vaughan, Fire Marshall, for specific Fire Department requirements. 970-
479-2252
PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS
Reviewed and accepted
Sincerely,
Town of Vail Page3
�
��SORT '
August 5, 2011
Tom Markalunas '
CO License 203318 �F C���
Resort Custom Homes �Q,'��' �qQ
55 Beattie Place, Suite 100 � p
Greenville, SC 29601 THOf�,�S J.
v. 864-233-6800 * MARKA!.l�NAS �r
f. 864-233-5131 � 2����� �
TMarkalunas(�a,ResortCustom.com ��� �
\
Martin A. Haeberle `� R�'�
Chief Building Official
.
Town of Vail d �� )�
Community Development Deparhnent �
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
v. 970-479-213 8
f. 970-479-2452
RE. 1127 Vail Valley DriveBll-0215 - Plan Review Comments, Dated 8-1-2011.
Mr. Haeberle,
Please accept this letter as response to the Architectural Comments dated 8-1-2011 in
reference to the architectural drawings for the Hadley Residence (1127 Vail Valley
DriveB 11-0215). Additionally, revised drawings shall be submitted to the Town of Vail
Community Development Department reflecting the revisions described in this letter.
Comment: Sheet T1
1. Revise plans to reflect all insulation and fenestration requirements as per Table
402.1.1 IECC as amended by the Town of Vail.
Response: All code references have been changed to reference Table 402.1.1 and Table
402.1.1 as amended by the Town of Vail
Comment: Sheet T3
1. Automatic fire protection systems to be installed per Town of Vail Fire Code
Response: Sheet T3 has been revised to reference R313.2 as amended by the Town of
Vail.
: � �� - •.�
:.� .:�� :.•
��S ORT
Comment: Sheet T4
1. Provide plans and specifications for the required radon system as adopted by the Town
of Vail. See Appendix F of the IRC.
Response: A note has been added to Sheet T 1 and Sheet A2.0 referring to Appendix F of
the IRC and describing the Radon Control Method. Additionally, sheets A2-0, A2-1, and
A2-2 have been revised to indicate the location of Radon Vent Pipes.
2. Revise plans to reflect the IBC for all structural elements of the building as adopted by
the Town of Vail.
Response: Notes referencing the foundation forming have been removed and reference
the structural drawings which will be revised to reference the IBC.
Comment: Sheet A2.0
1. Provide plans for the proposed pool and spa to include barrier and insulated cover
criteria per the IECC.
Response: A note has been added to sheet A2.0 indicating that the specified hot tub shall
be equipped with an insulated cover with a minimum R-13 insulation value per IECC
403.8
Comment: Sheet A2.1
1. Indicate the required one hour separation in garage to include structural support
members.
Response: A note has been added to sheet A2.1 to specify that the structural support
members for the garage floor and ceiling shall be protected and separated by 1-hour rated
construction.
2. Clarify if future elevator is within the scope of this project.
Response: The elevator is not within the scope of this project, the intention was to
provide vertically aligned areas and framing that would allow for the possibility to add an
elevator in the future.
Comment: Sheet A5.0
1. Provide a cross-sectional detail of the proposed stairs clearly identifying (detailing)
rise and run,handrails and guardrails.
Response: Additional details have been provided on sheet A5.0 indicating the rise, run,
handrail height, and guardrail dimensions.
. . �� - .•
• :. .:�� •.
�SORT
Comment: Sheet A5.2
1. Details do not reflect required weather protection and insulation at basement walls.
Revise plans
Response: Additional notes have been added to the wall sections on sheet A5.2 to
indicate the application of roll-on damp-proofing at the exterior of the foundation walls,
and the installation of exterior rigid insulation and drain board.
2. Show how the stone veneer is to be supported Iaterally.R703.7 IRC
Response: Additional notes have been added to the wall sections on sheet A5.2 to
indicate the installation of corrosion resistant masonry wall ties per section 703.4.4 of the
IRC.
3. How is moisture on back side of the stone veneer to be weeped from the wall?
R703.1.1 IRC
Response: Additional notes have been added to the wall sections on sheet A5.2 to
indicate the requirements for weepholes per section 703.7.6 of the IRC.
Sheet A8.0
1. Annotate on the plans the u values for the windows as per Table 402.1.1 IECC as
amended by the Town of Vail. Note the maximum of.30 u value is allowed.
Response: A note has been added to the"Window Notes" on sheet A8.0 indicating the
requirement for a maximum U-factor of.30
Please let us know if you have any further questions or comments in relation to the
referenced plans and revisions.
Regards,
-
Tom Markalunas
: • �� • •.�
:.- .:�� :.-
RESPONSE TO :
TOWN OF VAIL
BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS
HADLEY RESIDENCE
ii2�Vail Valley Drive
Lot 1i � Block 6 � Vail Village ist Filing
Vail, Colorado
SDG PROJECT NO. ii-oi�
August 5, 2oii
SLTNDQUIST DESIGN GROUP, INC. ��a 0 �,��
Q�p,V I D S C��L
Residential Services Division �,
C,:'
O'.t�`
Post Office Box 6�6 � pG��
Conifer,Colorado 80433 3 715 �;
��������� �
D e s i g n G r o u p (303)838-2222 phone �, � ���,•�,
STRVC'CURAL EXPERTISE•PRAGTICf�L SpLUTIONS �303)648-4464 f� "s• �
www.sundquistdesign.com S 0 L� �'
HADLEY RESIDENCE �
u2�Vail Valley Drive • Vail, Colorado �
'�,�.��`►��� ����
SDG ProJect No. il-o�� Q
AUgUSt 5, 2011 D e s i g n G r o u p
Page 1 of 1 STRUCTURAL EXPERTISE• PRACTICAL SOLUTtONS
NOTE: The following is a response to the structural comments noted within the
Town of Vail Department of Community Development Building Code
Analysis&Review Comments (see the attached copy)Log #Bss-o2i5.
Item #�: It is our understanding that the stair systems will be designed by the Stair
Supplier(design-build). The proposed stair designs should be submitted for
approval to our office and to the Architect.
Once we have reviewed and approved the designs,we will provide a stamped
and signed letter of acceptance.
Item #2: It is our understanding that the Lower Level Spa will be designed by Others
(design-build). The proposed spa design should be submitted for approval to
our office and to the Architect.
Once we have reviewed and approved the design, we will provide a stamped
and signed letter of acceptance.
Item Sl: Sheet S�.o has been updated to include all Special Inspections that are
required by our office.
Item S2.2: All building code references have been revised to 2009 IBC. This revision has
been noted accordingly on Sheets Si.o, 52.1, 52.2, 52.3.
Item S3.o: Details 4/S3.o and ii/S3.o have been updated to clarify veneer attachment
requirements at this condition.
Item S3.�: Detail9/53.1 is not intended to be a field welded condition, but a field weld
would be acceptable. This detail has been updated accordingly.
End of Report
Sundquist Design Group, Inc.
Residential Services Division
Post Office Box 6�6 • Conifer, CO 80433
�303) g38-2222 phone • (303) 648-4464 f�
TOWN OF VAIL �
75 South Frontage Road West Community Development Department
Vail, Colorado 81657 970.479.2138
vailgov.com 970.479.2452 fax
Date: August 1, 2011
Re: 1127 Vail Valley Drive/ B11-0215
Dear Mr Sands,
RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS
• Submit three complete sets of revised construction documents containing the
requested information with all plan revision items clouded or otherwise identified.
• Please respond in writing to each comment with a response letter addressing
each comment.
BUILDING COMMENTS
Architectural Comments:
Sheet T1
1. Revise plans to reflect all insulation and fenestration requirements as per Table
402.1.1 IECC as amended by the Town of Vail.
Sheet T3
1. Automatic fire protection systems to be installed per Town of Vail Fire Code
Sheet T4
1. Provide plans and specifications for the required radon system as adopted by the
Town of Vail. See Appendix F of the IRC.
2. Revise plans to reflect the IBC for all structural elements of the building as adopted
by the Town of Vail.
C1/C2
1. Plans to be sealed and signed by the registrant per the State of Colorado technical
registration rules.
2. It appears a surcharge is being imposed on the stone walls at the corner of the spa.
Please clarify
3. Show on plans utility locations and building sewer. Include upstream manhole rim
elevation for determination of the need for a backwater valve.
4. Show foundation drain termination points.
I LC
1. Plans to be sealed and signed by the registrant per State of Colorado.
Sheet A2.0
1. Provide plans for the proposed pool and spa to include barrier and insulated cover
criteria per the IECC.
Sheet A2.1
1. Indicate the required one hour separation in garage to include structural support
members.
2. Clarify if future elevator is with in the scope of this project.
Sheet A5.0
1. Provide a cross-sectional detail of the proposed stairs clearly identifying (detailing)
rise and run, handrails and guardrails.
Sheet A5.2
1. Details do not reflect required weather protection and insulation at basement walls.
Revise plans
2. Show how the stone veneer is to be supported Iaterally.R703.7 IRC
3. How is moisture on back side of the stone veneer to be weeped from the wall?
R703.1.1 IRC
Sheet A8.0
1. Annotate on the plans the u values for the windows as per Table 402.1.1 IECC as
amended by the Town of Vail. Note the maximum of .30 u value is allowed.
Electrical load calculations
1. Submitted load calculations do not include the future elevator nor the large amount of
heat tape being proposed. Revise calculations
Structural Comments:
General
1. Provide structural details for the proposed stairs
2. Provide structural plans for the proposed pool and spas
Sheet S1
1. List required special inspections and submit special inspection agreement with
resubmittal.
Sheet S2.2
1. The Town of Vail does not use the structural provisions of the IRC. The IBC is to be
used. Revise plans to reflect the IBC.
Sheet S3.0
1. Stone veneer design over 30 feet to be designed for attachment and support.
Town of Vail Page2
Sheet S3.1
1. Is detail 9 to be field welded? Please clarify
Plumbinq Comments:
1. See Civil plans comments for building sewer
Mechanical Comments:
Sheet A5.2
1. Plans to reflect the required listing and or engineer design for the proposed chimney
cap.
Sheet M-1
1. Annotate on plans the efficiency of the furnace and boilers. Note a minimum of 92%
efficiency required.
Sheet M-2
1. Indicate if the kitchen hood exceeds 400 cfm. If so, show the required makeup air.
Reference section 505.2 IMC
Electrical Comments:
Sheet AE2.0/AE2.1
1. Annotate on the plans the 50% high efficacy requirement per the IECC
2. Clearly identify location and size of all panelboards on the plans. See Town of Vail
submittal requirements.
PLANNING COMMENTS
Approval conditional on submittal of approval letter to use access easement for
construction purposes.
FIRE COMMENTS
Contact Mike Vaughan, Fire Marshall, for specific Fire Department requirements. 970-
479-2252
PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS
Reviewed and accepted
Sincerely,
Martin A. Haeberle
Chief Building Official
Town of Vail Page3
Job Name: �Y �l'l�/�G��
� #t Job Address: rl2? (/��(L U�Y AQ.
���F�� � Permit No.: ,��—0��
SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT
(To applicants of projects requiring Special Inspection or Testing per Section 1701 of the IBC)
The owner or his/her representative, on the advice of the design professional in responsible charge, shall
complete, seal, sign and submit a copy of the Special Inspection Agreement and Structural Tests
Scheduled to the Town of Vail for review and approval. Signatures are required on both pages;
photocopied or faxed signatures are acceptable.
The owner and his/her general contractor, where applicable, shall also acknowledge the following
conditions applicable to Special Inspection Testing:
1. Contractor is responsible for proper notification to the Inspection or Testing agency for items
listed.(Page 1) (IBC 1704)
2. Only the testing laboratory should take samples and transport them to their laboratory.
3. Copies of all laboratory reports and inspections are to be sent directly to the Town of Vail by the Testing
agency on a weekly basis.
4. Inspection agency to submit names and qualifications of on-site special inspectors to the Town of Vail
for review and approval.( Page 2)
5. The special inspector is responsible to immediately notify the Town of Vail Building Official in writing of
any concerns and/or problems encountered.
6. It is the responsibility of the contractor to review the Town of Vail approved plans for additional
inspection or testing requirements that may be noted. A pre-construction conference at the job site is
recommended to review special inspection procedures.
7. The special inspector shall use only the Town of Vail approved drawings.
8. All special inspection field reports must be left on site for review by the Town of Vail staff prior to
required inspections or re-inspections.
BEFORE OCCUPANCY WILL BE GRANTED: The special inspection agency shall submit a signed and
sealed statement that all items requiring testing and inspection were fulfilled and reported. Those items not
tested and/or inspected shall be noted in this statement. A copy of the statement shall be maintained at the
job site for the Building Inspector's review prior to final inspection.
Acknowledgement:
Owner:
Signature Print Name Date
Special Inspection
Agency:
ignatu Print Name Date
Project �
Arch/Eng: ��� j7• �JL�N��l.��7 (�
ignat Print Name Date
�'
Contractor:
Signature Print Name Date
-3-
;
,
TOWNOFyAIL � SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING SCHEDULE
(IBC 1704)
Project Name: ����[�l(�� Permit# ��r 02��'�
Owner's Name:
Testing Inspection Signature PrintName Date
Agency:
Testing Inspection Signature PrintName Date
Hereby certifies that the Testing/Inspection Agency named above has been engaged to pertorm structural tests and
inspections during construction as checked below,to satisfy all applicable portions of the Building Code.
Prior to final inspection, the Inspection Agency shall submit a statement that all items of designated work performed
were reported. Any items checked but not tested or inspected will be noted and explained. Whenever any designated
items on the list are ready for sampling, testing, or inspection, it shall be the responsibility of the contractor to give
. timely notice to the Inspection agency so that the required services may be performed.
REINFORCING STEEL: UNDERPINNING:
Tensile&Bend,one set per heat per tons Temporary/Permanent
� Inspection of Piacement Inspection of Steel Fabrication
Inspection of Welding Inspection of Reinforcing&Forms
Epoxy Inspection of Concrete Placement
Inspection of Tiebacks
MASONRY:
Prelim.Acceptance Tests(Masonry Units,Wall Prisms) SOIL NAILS:
Subsequent Tests(Mortar,Grout, Field Wall Prisms) Temporary Shoring
Inspection of Placement and Grouting Permanent Wall
CONCRETE,SHOTCRETE,GROUT AND MORTAR: STRUCTURAL STEEL:
Concrete Shot Grout Mortar Sample 8 Test(List specific members below)
Aggregate tests for design Shop Identification&Welding Inspection
Suitability of aggregates Shop Ultrasonic Inspection
Mix Designs Shop Radiography
Test Panel � Field Welding Inspection
Batch Plant Inspection Field Bolting(nspection
Cement Grab Sampie Field Ultrasonic Inspection
Inspect Placing Field Radiography
Compression Tests Metal Deck Welding Inspection
Cast Specimens FIREPROOFING:
Pick-up Samples Inspection&Placement
Shrinkage Bars
Yield Check SOI
Air Check Acceptance Tests
Dry Unit Weight Moisture-Density Determination
PRECAST CONCRETE: Field Density
Reinforcing Tests Drilled Piers
Inspection of Reinforcing Placement Deep Foundation
Tendon Tests
Inspection of Tendon Placement STRUCTURAL WOOD:
Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspection of Fabrication
inspection of Concrete Batching Inspection of Truss Joint Fabrication
Inspection of Panel Attachment&Inserts Sample&Test Components
Compression Tests Inspection of Glu Lam Fabrication
Inspection of Stressing/Transfer
SMOKE CONTROL:
PILING,CAISSONS,CAPS,TIES:
Inspection of Reinforcing Placement SPECIAL CASES:
Inspection of Concrete Placement
Inspection of Concrete Batching SPECIAL INSPECTION:
Seismic Resistance
Specify other tests, inspections or specral instructions required. Wind Requirements
-4-
- .-..:� . ., ,
_. . , . . _
. . x . �.w
�x�, � �
�.a.. . . .
�,� - -
, : ., _ .:
r ,
, . �
��-�� .
August 4, 2011 CivilF.r�gineerir�g
Sruveying
& �eyond
Mr. Greg Sands ndar•
Hermes Resort Properties 4�°° les Un 1;n,; � '
P.O. Box 2633
Edwards, CO 81632
Re: Hadley Residence, 1127 Vail Valley Drive, B11-0215
BUI File 11003
Dear Greg:
This letter is in response to the items pertaining to the Hadley Residence raised by Mr. Martin
Haeberle, the Chief Building Official for the Town of Vail in his letter to you dated August 1,
2011.
We have discussed some of these individual items with Mr. Haeberle & yourself. This letter will
summarize the items in the same order& will reference back to the original letter for clarity. The
original letter comments are italicized.
C1/C2
�. Plans to be sealed and signed by the registrcznt per the State of Colorado technical
registration rules. Please find enclosed 4 signed & sealed copies each of C1 & C2.
z. It appears a surcharge is being imposed on the stone walls at the corner of the spa.
Please clarify. Per discussion with Mr. Haeberle & Joe Sundquist the Structural Engineer
for the project, Joe will treat the spa design as a "deferred submittal" for the sake of the
Building Department and will review any surcharge on the spa.
3. Show on plans utility locations and building sewer. Include upstream manhole rim
elevation for determination of the need for a backwater valve. The site was originally
surveyed in the winter& no utility information was available. Because the house is a
raze & rebuild, it is anticipated the new structure will be utilizing the existing utility
services where appropriate. Notes have been added to C1 regarding the wet & dry
utilities. The elevation of the sewer service & the upstream manhole was not available,
therefore a note was added to confirm these elevations during construction. If the sewer
service is lower than the upstream manhole rim elevation, then a backwater valve will be
installed on the sewer service.
4. Show foundation drain termination points. The foundation drain will terminate into a
designated drywell for this drain at the north east corner of the new structure. The
location has been shown on C1, and details have been added to C2.
Thank you for the opportunity to discuss the project. If you have any additional questions or
comments, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sin rely,
U DA S UNLIMITED, INC.
�
Philip A. Harris
�_`_� - • •��- - - 1 - •�• • e • : .1 • 1 • � o � • c�
.
, �
;..:,_ . ,,.
- ,�,
Residential Optional Calculation 9�25�,s9� Hadley Residence I,
, ��s�a�� Version 7.28 I
STEP 1 Article 220.42&220.52 Dave Peterson Electric '
_�
sq•ft � 8200 General Lighting load 24,600 VA PO Box 711
6 Small Appliance 9,000 VA Edwards,CO 81632 '
4 Laundry circuit 6,000 VA Ph 970 926 4140 Fax 970 926 4626 I
Gen.Lgt.,Sm App.&Laun. Load 39,600 VA 8/10/2011 11:20 1
General lighting,Sm.Appl.&Laundry 39,600 VA
STEP 2 Article 220.50&220.51
1.5 ton • 2,900 VA AHU 1 skW � 5,800 VA Total Heat Load 11,600 VA
3.5 ton � 5,800 VA AHU 2 skW � 5,800 VA Total CU Load 14,500 VA
3.5 ton � 5,800 VA AHU 3 seiect � VA Central Electric Heat C 65%,vs.A/C C�3 100% 14,500 VA
/+/C#4 � VA AHU 4 Select � VA
A/C#5 � VA AHU 5 Select � VA
STEP 3 Article 220.53 Appliance Demand Load 74,688 VA
a,soo v,a . 1 Water Heater 4,500 VA
i,aoo va . 4 Refrigerator 5,600 VA Dryer Demand Load 28,000 VA
60o vA � 2 Freezer 1,200 VA
i,o3ovn � 2 Dishwasher 2,060 VA Range Demand load 11,000 VA
690 VA . 1 Disposal 690 VA
�8o va . 1 Trash Compactor 780 VA Service Demand 86,855 VA
1,�0o va . 3 Microwave 5,100 VA
❑ . Central Vac VA Demand Load 362 A
340 VA � 4 Mini Refrigerator 1,360 VA
� aoo v,a . 2 Range hood 800 VA Neutral Demand 240 A
0 3,soo vA . 1 Heat Tape 3,500 VA
i,soo vA . Ironing Center VA Min.Service Req. 400 A
❑ 10 hp . Jacuzzi Tub 11,500 VA
❑ seiecc . Sprinkler Pump VA Min. Feeder size 600
❑ seiect • Well Pump VA Min. Neutral size 350
seiect . Fountain Pump VA Eq.Grding Cond. 1
�.5 np � Elevator 9,200 VA � Aluminium
Pool Equip. Panel 15,798 VA Apply Demand
❑ 9600 Steamer 9,600 VA No Demand
❑ 3000 Boot Warmers 3,000 VA No Demand Total Appliance Load 74,688 VA
STEP 4 Article 220.54
Electric Clothes Dryers 28,000 VA
STEP 5 Article 220.55
Electric Ranges 8,000 W Col C demand 5,000 W
Number of appliances 3
Cooktop Col B demand
❑Check Box for Gas Range Cooktop 3,000 W Col B demand
Oven(s) 8,000 W Col B demand
Oven(s) Col B demand
Number of appliances 1 oem.Factor
Cooktop&Oven Demand Load
impl ids@earthlink.net
»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»>»«««««««««u««««««««««««««<
Pool Panel Feeder Calculation �see rvote) A B N Continuous Non-continuous
Continuous Motors 2,444 . . . . . . 1118 1118 0 Motors Motors
Non-continuous �,7g4 . . . . . . 897 897 0 1/z np � ❑ zaov 1/4 hp � ❑ zaw
Spa heater 11 kVA 1 , . , , , , 6875 6875 1/3 np . ❑ zaov 1/2 hp � ❑ zaov
Pool heater 3.5 ton 0 . . . . . 0 0 seiect �
. ❑ 2ao� seiecc . ❑ zao�
Pool heater 5 ton
o . . . . . . o o se�ecc • ❑ zaov se�ect . ❑ zaov
Pool Light l00 � 0 . . . . . . 100 0 100 select . ❑ 2aov selecc �
❑ zao�
Blower i/a np � 667 ❑ zaov 334 334 0
other load 0 ❑ zaov 0 0 0 0.0 Motor Neutral Load
other load 0 � 240v 0 0 0
❑Co er Pool Feeder 77.6989583 78 A 77 A 1 A Max.Unbalanced Neutral Load
Phase Amperes Neut.load
Generated by REScheck-Web Software
Compliance Certificate
Energy Code: 2009 IECC
Location: Eagle County,Colorado
Construction Type: Single Family
Building Orientation: Bldg. faces 180 deg. from North
Glazing Area Percentage: 2g%
Heating Degree Days: 8499
Climate Zone: g
Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor:
. . - . ..- .
Compliance: 1.5%Better Than Code Maximum UA: 1313 Your UA:1293
The%Befler or Worse Than Code intlex reflects how dose to compiiance the house is based on cotle trade-ofl rules.
It nOFC N„^,T pro�,-�.�e an erim,,+�,r Energy use or cost relative fo a minimum-wde home_
•
� .
Basement:Solid Concrete or fvlasonry 1035 11.0 0.0 64
Orientation:Front
Wall height: 11.2'
Depth below grade:9.0'
Insulation depth: 11.2'
Basement:Solid Concrete or Masonry 933 11.0 0.0 53
Orientation:Right Side
Wall height: 11.2'
Depth below grade: 10.0'
Insulation depth: 11.2'
Wall:Wood Frame, 16in.o.c. 1112 19.0 0.0 50
Orientation:Front
Window:Wood Frame,2 Pane w!Low-E 215 0.330 7�
SHGC:0.18
Orientation:Front
Door:Giass 56 0.330 �g
SHGC:0.18
Orientation:Front
Wall:Wood Frame, 16in.o.c. 728 19.0 0.0 24
Orientation:Right Side
Window:Wood Frame,2 Pane w/Low-E 113 0.330 37
SHGC:0.18
Orientation:Right Side
Door:Solid 216 0.100 22
Orientation:Right Side
Wall:Wood Frame, 16in.o.c. 2164 19.0 0.0 �pg
Orientation:Left Side
Window:Wood Frame,2 Pane w/Low-E 310 0.330 102
SHGC:0.18
Orientation:Left Side
Door:Solid 48 0.100 5
Orientation:Left Side
Wall:Wood Frame, 16in.o.c. 1666 19.0 0.0 54
Orientation:Back
Window:Wood Frame,2 Pane w/Low-E 525 0.330 �73
SHGC:0.18
Orientation:Back
Door:Glass 240 0.330 7g
Project Title:
Data filename: Report date: 08l10/11
Page 1 of 6
SHGC:0.18
Orientation:Back
Ceiling:Fiat or Scissor Truss 1700 49.0 0.0 44
Ceiling:Cathedral 3600 41.0 0.0 94
Ftoor:Heated Slab-On-Grade 375 7.0 295
Insulation depth:2.0'
Compliance Statement: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the buiiding plans,specifications,and other
calculations submitted with the permit application.The proposed building has be designed to meet the 2009 IECC requirements in
REScheck-Web and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the ck Inspection Checklist.
C�d�€�C�. �rr�� -�—�tz-e� ,(1-�� '� '
Name-Title Signatur Date
Project Title: Report date: 08/10/11
Data filename: Page 2 of 6
Generated by REScheck-Web Software
Inspection Checklist
Ceilings:
❑ Ceiling: Flat or Scissor Truss, R-49.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
❑ Ceiling:Cathedral,R-41.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
Above-Grade Walls:
❑ Wall:Wood Frame, 16in.o.c.,R-19.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
❑ Wall:Wood Frame, 16in.o.c., R-19.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
❑ Wall:Wood Frame, 16in.o.c., R-19.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
❑ Wall:Wood Frame, 16in.o.c., R-19.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
Basement Walis:
❑ Basement:Solid Concrete or Masonry, 11.2'ht/9.0'bg/11.2'insui,R-11.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
❑ Basement:Solid Concrete or Masonry, 11.2'ht/10.0'bg/11.2'insul,R-11.0 cavity insulation
Comments:
Windows:
❑ Window:Wood Frame,2 Pane w/Low-E, U-factor:0.330
For windows without labeled U-factors,describe features:
#Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No
Comments:
❑ Window:Wood Frame,2 Pane w/Low-E, U-factor:0.330
For windows without labeled U-factors,describe features:
#Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No
Comments:
❑ Window:Wood Frame,2 Pane w/Low-E,U-factor:0.330
For windows without labeled U-factors,describe features:
#Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No
Comments:
❑ Window:Wood Frame,2 Pane w/Low-E,U-factor:0.330
For windows without labeled U-factors,describe features:
#Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No
Comments:
Doors:
❑ Door:Glass,U-factor:0.330
Comments:
❑ Door:Solid,U-factor:0.100
Project Title: Report date: 08/10/11
Data filename: Page 3 of 6
Comments:
❑ Door:Solid,U-factor:0.100
Comments:
❑ Door:Glass,U-factor:0.330
Comments:
Floors: '
❑ Floor:Heated Slab-On-Grade,2.0'insulation depth,R-7.0 continuous insulation
Comments:
Siab insulation extends down from the top of the slab to at least 2.0 ft.OR down to at least the bottom of the slab then horizontally for a
total distance of 2.0 ft.
Air Leakage:
� Joints(including rim joist junctions),attic access openings,penetrations,and all other such openings in the building envelope that are
sources of air leakage are sealed with caulk,gasketed,weatherstripped or othenvise sealed with an air barrier material,suitable film or
solid material.
� Air barrier and sealing exists on common walls between dwelling units,on exterior walls behind tubs/showers,and in openings between
window/door jambs and framing.
� Recessed lights in the building thermal envelope are 1)type IC rated and ASTM E283 labeled and 2)sealed with a gasket or caulk
between the housing and the interior wall or ceiling covering.
� Access doors separating conditioned from unconditioned space are weather-stripped and insulated(without insulation compression or
damage)to at least the level of insulation on the surrounding surfaces.Where loose fill insulation exists,a baffle or retainer is installed
to maintain insulation application.
� Wood-burning fireplaces have gasketed doors and outdoor combustion air.
Air Sealing and Insulation:
� Building envelope air tightness and insulation installation complies by either 1)a post rough-in blower door test result of less than 7
ACH at 33.5 psf OR 2)the following items have been satisfied:
(a)Air barriers and thermal barrier:Installed on outside of air-permeable insulation and breaks or joints in the air barrier are filled or
repaired.
(b)Ceiling/attic:Air barrier in any dropped ceiling/so�t is substantially aligned with insulation and any gaps are sealed.
(�)Above-grade walls:Insulation is installed in substantial contact and continuous alignment with the building envelope air barrier.
(d)Floors:Air barrier is installed at any exposed edge of insulation.
(e)Plumbing and wiring: Insulation is placed between outside and pipes.Batt insulation is cut to fit around wiring and plumbing,or
sprayed/blown insulation extends behind piping and wiring.
(f) Corners,headers,narrow framing cavities,and rim joists are insulated.
(9)Shower/tub on exterior wall:Insulation exists between showers/tubs and exterior wall.
Sunrooms:
� Sunrooms that are thermally isolated from the building envelope have a maximum fenestration U-factor of 0.50 and the maximum
skylight U-factor of 0.75.New windows and doors separating the sunroom from conditioned space meet the building thermal envelope
requirements.
Materials identification and Installation:
� Materials and equipment are installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions.
� Insulation is installed in substantial contact with the surtace being insulated and in a manner that achieves the rated R-value.
� Materials and equipment are identified so that compliance can be determined.
� Manufacturer manuals for all installed heating and cooling equipment and service water heating equipment have been provided.
� Insulation R-values,glazing U-factors,and heating equipment efficiency are cieariy marked on the buiiding plans or specifications.
Duct Insulation:
� Supply ducts in attics are insulated to a minimum of R-8.All other ducts in unconditioned spaces or outside the building envelope are
insulated to at least R-6.
Duct Construction and Testing:
� Building framing cavities are not used as supply ducts.
� All joints and seams of air ducts,air handlers,filter boxes,and building cavities used as return ducts are substantially airtight by means
of tapes,mastics,liquid sealants,gasketing or other approved closure systems.Tapes,mastics,and fasteners are rated UL 181A or
UL 181 B and are labeled according to the duct construction.Metal duct connections with equipment and/or fittings are mechanically
Project Title: Report date: 08/10/11
Data filename: Page 4 of 6
fastened. Crimp joints for round metal ducts have a contact lap of at least 1 1!2 inches and are fastened with a minimum of three ��,
equally spaced sheet-metal screws. '
Exceptions: �,
Joint and seams covered with spray polyurethane foam. �
Where a partially inaccessible duct connection exists,mechanical fasteners can be equally spaced on the exposed portion of the
joint so as to prevent a hinge effect.
Continuously welded and locking-type longitudinal joints and seams on ducts opereting at less than 2 in.w.g.(500 Pa).
� Duct tightness test has been performed and meets one of the following test criteria:
(�)Postconstruction leakage to outdoors test:Less than or equal to 736.0 cfm(8 cfm per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area).
(2)Postconstruction total leakage test(including air handler enclosure):Less than or equal to 1104.0 cfm(12 cfm per 100 ft2 of
conditioned floor area)pressure differentiai of 0.1 inches w.g.
(3)Rough-in total leakage test with air handler installed:Less than or equal to 552.0 cfm(6 cfm per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area)
when tested at a pressure differential of 0.1 inches w.g.
(4)Rough-in total leakage test without air handler installed:Less than or equal to 368.0 cfm(4 cfm per 100 ft2 of conditioned floor area).
Heating and Cooling Equipment Sizing:
� Additional requirements for equipment sizing are included by an inspection for compliance with the International Residential Code.
� For systems serving multiple dwelling units documentation has been submitted demonstrating compliance with 2009 IECC Commercial
Building Mechanical and/or Service Water Heating(Sections 503 and 504).
Circulating Service Hot Water Systems:
� Circulating service hot water pipes are insulated to R-2.
� Circulating service hot water systems include an automatic or accessible manual switch to turn off the circulating pump when the
system is not in use.
Heating and Cooling Piping Insulation:
� HVAC piping conveying fluids above 105 degrees F or chilled fluids below 55 degrees F are insulated to R-3.
Swimming Pools:
� Heated swimming pools have an on/off heater switch.
� Pool heaters operating on natural gas or LPG have an electronic pilot light.
� Timer switches on pool heaters and pumps are present.
Exceptions:
Where public health standards require continuous pump operation.
Where pumps operate within solar-and/or waste-heat-recovery systems.
� Heated swimming pools have a cover on or at the water surtace.For pools heated over 90 degrees F(32 degrees C)the cover has a
minimum insulation value of R-12.
Exceptions:
Covers are not required when 60%of the heating energy is from site-recovered energy or solar energy source.
Lighting Requirements:
� A minimum of 50 percent of the lamps in permanently installed lighting fixtures can be categorized as one of the following:
(a)Compact fluorescent
(b)T-8 or smaller diameter linear fluorescent
(�)40 lumens per watt for lamp wattage<=15
(d)50 lumens per watt for lamp wattage> 15 and<=40
�e)60 lumens per watt for lamp wattage>40
Other Requirements:
� Snow-and ice-melting systems with energy supplied from the service to a building shall include automatic controls capable of shutting
off the system when a)the pavement temperature is above 50 degrees F,b)no precipitation is falling,and c)the outdoor temperature is
above 40 degrees F(a manual shutoff control is also permitted to satisfy requirement'c').
Certificate:
� A permanent certificate is provided on or in the electricat distribution panel listing the predominant insulation R-values;window
U-factors;type and e�ciency of space-conditioning and water heating equipment.The certificate does not cover or obstruct the visibility
of the circuit directory label,service disconnect label or other required labels.
NOTES TO FIELD: (Building Department Use Only)
Project Title: Report date: OS/10/11
Data filename: Page 5 of 6
Project Title: Report date: 08/10/11
Data filename: Page 6 of 6
2009 IECC Energy
Efficiency Certificate
. .
Ceiling/Roof 41.00
Wall 19.00
Fioor/Foundation 11.00
Ductwork(unconditioned spaces):
�.. . .
Window 0.33 0.18
Door 0.33 0.18
. .. . .
Heating System:
Cooling System:
Water Heater.
Name: Date:
Comments:
CBEnvironmental, LLC
���3��-sss�.to�► so��5-oi��F��
July 28, 2011 � �+ � �� �
Mr. Mike Dowiing
United Environmental
3736 Yukon Court [ C� [� 0 � (�
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 �
Subject: Asbestos Final Air Clearance Report JUL 2 9 ZO11
TOWN OF VAIL
Dear Mr. Dowling:
CB Environmental, LLC (CBE) was retained by United Environmental (United), to perform
industrial hygiene services related to post-asbestos abatement work area/containment visual
and air monitoring clearances. This report is specific to the events conducted on July 28,
2011, located at 1127 Vail Valley Road in Vail, Colorado. Clearance services were
conducted in the basement of the house. The CBE on-site representative was responsible for
consulting with the United representative, to ensure the abatement areas and materials
removed were understood so that clearances could be properly performed.
Final Visual Clearance
Upon completion of asbestos removal activities, a final visual inspection of the work area is
required by the app{icable regulations. A certified AMS must visually inspect the work area for
any dust or debris remaining in the area. If the inspector notes any such dust or debris, the
abatement contra�tor is required to re-clean the work area until such time that the inspecting
AMS does not observe any dust or debris in the work area.
Mr. Mike Lococo conducted the final visual inspection of the site. Mr. Lococo is certified
(#13438) as an Asbestos Inspector, Abatement Designer, Air Monitoring Specialist, and
Project Manager as specified by the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and
the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). It was determined that
the abatement contractor had properly cleaned the work area completely of all dust and debris.
The inspe�ting AMS required no further cleaning.
Final Clearance Air Monitoring and Sampling Methodology
Final clearance air samples must be collected from the work area after completion of a final
visual inspection and prior to teardown of the containment structure. Analysis of each these
samples must show airbome asbestos fiber concentrations of less than or equal to 0.010 f/cc.
If concentrations exceed this limit, the abatement contractor must re-clean the work area and a
second set of final clearance air samples must be collected and analyzed. This process is
repeated until the analytical results of the final clearance air samples meet the regulatory
standard. Only upon successfully completion of the final clearance air monitoring process may
an asbestos abatement project be considered complete, and teardown of the containment
structure can commence. Mr. Lococo completed the final clearance air sampling.
Final clearance air samples were collected using constant flow high-volume air sampling
pumps, 25 mm air sampling cassettes, flexible tubing and adjustable sampling stands. The
sampling cassettes were attached to one end of the ftexible tubing and placed on the stands
approximately forty-eight (48) inches above the floor. The opposite ends of the flexible tubing
were attached to the air sampling pumps. Each pump was activated and operated at a flow
rate of approximately sixteen liters per minute (16 LPM) for a period of approximately eighty-
five (80) minutes. Aggressive air sampling techniques, as described in 40 CFR Part 763,
Appendix A to Subpart E, were utilized throughout the sample collection process. Upon
completion of the final clearance air sampling, labels containing sample identification numbers,
sample location, pump flow rate, and total sample time were applied to each sampling
cassette.
Per the applicable regulations, based on the quantity of ACM removed during the abatement
project, five (5) final clearance air samples were collected in the full containment work area
located at the site.
Analytical Methodology and Laboratory results
The CBE representative is trained in Phase Contrast Microscopy by National Institute of
Occupational Safety (NIOSH) 582 Equivalent Course and successfully participates in the
American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Proficiency Analytical Testing Program (PAT)
for determining concentrations of airborne asbestos fibers (Lab ID 201293).
The results of the laboratory analysis of the final clearance air monitoring samples confirm that
the concentrations of airborne fibers within the work area were below the regulatory limit of
0.010 f/cc. Results below the detection limit are listed as BDL. A copy of the analytical results
of the final clearance air sampling is included in Appendix A of this Report.
Conclusions:
CBE provided asbestos abatement clearance services in the building located at 1127 Vail
Valley Road in Vail, Colorado on July 28, 2011. Air samples were collected in a full
containment until all samples were below the regulatory level of 0.010 f/cc and before
teardown of containment was approved. Therefore, the work area was Gean upon completion
of the abatement project and is ready for re-occupancy.
Limitations:
This report describes the data collected and observations made by CBE during the final
clearance sampling in the basement of the above referenced building. CBE represents that its
services were performed within the limits prescribed by applicable regulations, within scope of
work as approved by the EPA and the State of Colorado and in a manner consistent with the
level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other professional consultants under similar
circumstances.
CBE accepts no responsibility for data collected, the recommendations made or expressed to
the client, and/or other commitments made by persons or firms other than CBE. No other
representation is made to the client, expressed or implied, and no warranty or guarantee is
incfuded or intended.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide United asbestos survey services. If you have any
questions on this asbestos building inspection, please conta�t me at your earliest convenience.
Respectfulfy Submitted,
CB Environmental, LLC
., ,� ,
Mike Lococo
Project Manager
Attachment
APPENDIX A
LABORATORY RESULTS
FINAL CLEARANCE AIR SAMPLING C�3A�,nvironmental, LLC
Client: U�ited Environmental Project Contact: Mike Dowling
Collected by: Mike Lxoco
Job#: Location: 1127 Vail Vailey Rd,Vail,CO PCM Analyst: Mike lococo Date: 7/28/11
Means of pump calibration: Filter ECA: Microscope tield area: PCM Filter: TEM Fifter:
Giqan Gilibrator# _X_385mm' _X_0.00785mm' _X_0.8um 25mm Mft MCE <0.45um 25mm Mtt_
Calibrated Rotometer# X mm= mm' O.Sum 37mm Lot# PC <0.45um 37mm Lot#
Sample
Sample# Description! Air Volume Fbrs.
Pum # T Lxation: Activit : Start: Sto Total Minutes: Start: Sto : Avera Liters Fids. LOQ Fibers/cc
� Field Blank - - - ' " ' - Avera e:
9
0/100
Field Blank - - - - - - - - - -
2
12
3 IWA North Side CL 1145 1315 90 16 15.9 15.95 1435.5 100 0.002 0.004
12
4 IWA East Side CL 1148 1315 87 16 16 16 1392 100 0.002 0.004
8
5 IWA South Side CL 1150 1318 86 16 15.5 15.75 1354.5 100 0.002 0.003
5 '
6 IWA West Side CL 1152 1317 85 15.8 15.8 15.8 1343 100 �.002 0.002
7.5
7 IWA Center Cl 1155 1317 82 16 15.9 15.95 1307.9 100 0.002 0.003
9
10
Please use reverse side oi torm tor sampling location map.
Please fiil out a CHAIN OF CUSTODY
SAMPLE TYPE: HEX m HEPA exhaust
P a pg�gp�e� NR=Filte�Not
IWA=Inside work area Readable
OSWA=outside work area
ACTIVITY:
CL=flnat c learance
REM=removal
CU=clean up
GB=91ove bag
B/O=bag out
PREP=work site preparetion
FINAL CLEARANCE AIR SAMPLING C;���_!;nvironmental, LLC
Client: United Environmental Project Contact: Mike Dowling
Collected by: Mike Lococo
Job#: Location: 1127 Vail VaUey Rd,Vall,CO PCM Malyst: Mike Lococo Date: 7/25/11
Means of pump calibratlon: Filter ECA: Microscope field area: PCM FiRer: TEM Filter:
GiNan Gilibrator# _X_385mm' _X 0.00785mm' X 0.8um 25mm Mft MCE <0.45um 25mm MR
Calibrated Rotometer# X mm2 mm' 0.8um 37mm Lot# PC <0.45um 37mm Lot#
Sample#
Puma#
3
5
Field Blank
Field Blank
IWA
IWA
Description/
Location:
West Side of
Container
East Side of
Container
7
8
9
10
Please use reverse side of form for sampling location map.
Please flll out a CHAiN OF CUSTODY
CL
Start:
945
1105
1105
�
�
'-��
�
16
16
16
SAMPLE TYPE: HEX=HEPA exhaust
P=personal NR=Filter Not
IWA=inside work area Reada6le
OSWA=outside wwk area
Air Volume Fbra.
�era e Liters Flds. LOQ Fibers/c
- - Average:
_ _ 0l100 _
6
5.95 1276 100 0.002 0.002
5.5
16 1264 100 0.002 0.002
ACTIVITY:
CL=tinal c learance
REM=removal
CU�clean up
GB=glove bag
B/O=bag out
PREP=work site preparatio�
APPENDIX B
PHOTOS
��.n.vironmental, LLC ---
.,.'i.h �.�J;. 3 v��e ... ��;.�. Ll:t3 �t7�..`Y t'J`'� �c�._�
\ � �
� s���� 1
�. , �. �
, A�� ;
, �
�: „�
; �::
�;: �, �
�� � `'�
�; �. 4 :
r� ;i �
:" i �.:�..;�
.�^" n �=?o�.
1
"r
�
1. Final Vsual and Fn�Clearance. 2. Final Vsual and Final Clearance.
- � ,��+tr� II
o�`� I
�:.�� j :
� �. ��,,
r n� ?�' �r �' II ��+
�,��fl' � ��� il�� �.�
6 li� �� �Ni���y�� � ,
�j ��F'F$,� R 4;4,,:. °d
� I ��� . . �....,,.
. :�,�'��_+�..
'@` � S
�N,� � ,
,. ��
3. Final Visual and Final Clearance. 4. Final Vsual and Fin�Ciearance.
.�.s
� ; � "� ,
,
f �'� � � � ;
S ���R? � j � �,i. �
i i
�
fi� .. X f, . �M1 ��
4� �
�! � .�
,.. :
��
� f�
1 ' xu )� .. �• �/J`'`�` 9F'
a ....;.k� � . .
.... -s.�
_ y�-" i
$
F . � n... .rt� �a .
... � . .... ._ ..,.... , ...
�,...�
� �
�..'.Mi.' � �.,� ,.
$'k:
_-�i'-..__..._. .... _`_. . - ..:u•".�,,,�.�,:�' ,.
5. Final Vsual and Final Clearance. 6. Final vsual and Final Clearance.
Date of Photogr�hs July 28,2011 �
Final Clearances 1127 Vail Valley Road,Vail,CO
CBEnvironmental, LLC
' =�s�,,_� `.?�l-lOt�2(�f�ce �0� 23�-�}1�=� Fag
I i� � j� i i �. �� �i�' �� I
������ �
�
�
�.�:*
�
s � �:
�
��
��� �. .� �,�
�
q�,y �� 'r`,r ) jy��,�.�i��;'�� � .
M10- ' . y� ,�y���{�,},� ..
E.� �: ,_ ° �
F, § _
� a�
i�«i �. . .«. . .:.,.: . ...:v. �' ,. .... . ,
-.. .,_.e �..:.. �. . . .
�. e .w. • : ..q�
�
�....�.�_ w
7. Final vsual and Final Clearance. 8. Final Vsual and Final Clearance.
�,� .�; `:
:�
� ��-. �;_���. ' �":�
- ti,�.:
�,�� - � „� � ���.� ��'`
.�� y� �.".`a�� � �� ��w
� � � A ' v ��� ����
,��'`�,'��y'� °`�h `�,; �
.`� ,`�."A� "���-''�' �r��� " � t�'�� ::�-%. -,
�` �� �F
tlW y
��.� �,��,
� �- a�
x
-
'n Clearance.
' I�sual and Fi al
9. Final Vsual and Final Clearance. 10
. F�na
Date of Photogr�hs July 28,2011 2
Final Clearances 1127 Vail Valley Road,Vail,CO
APPENDIX C
CERTIFICATIONS
----_ _
.m .. .. . � ..
• �'•�' P � . .eY�i� ��irAii'�i�'. .�. �e'�R;i� �� �� �.. iij:.. kp.:� ��..!�b„-.` ��..�`l',�fo� .�i�o�a.:s.;.;�,v�."�,T .y _ � �- , .._.. .�,. .
�r.t��S� i E .l ,�.� .1•+' �q4 ' "% '\h°�' o.+a, ° a Y;il ,'"�y 4:J.6 n .�.o ; 4�7!.���P' a { T,."
���� / t i[ a�.;e �4 � �',� � ,'�i �" �4 ���° -� f�� i � �! �w e f I � i I i'� t' S 4,�.. i !� r^ .
r ,'� ♦ ���`�,� �� � ' ;�. � �r.a ,,r tia � c;�ix t�a i ,��'3 t ii� 3e,S n� d i, � ; , .
����1j� '. S�!..�� ' NI !.�� � � �1,.tC ��.1�1;� *'�� � \. � jiil.�� l', �. ..�?��Y t ��i�i �`iio�� a•!���'t1•,r'�'-�" t�.�t'l:;�i i.����a� Ei !'��'ri 1 .�'�r� i��� W� . i/� ��� j� �\1 ,��d/ �!���
„� i�y�, ..�n�(� ♦ � ,��. t �:a.•-, \ �i � �.. � :�tr�.� 1 ���,.,.�+ii�♦ .�� i�r�.�. �� ��ir.�.�� t D �`. ' e������, �.�� ���f�� ,[��.� ��.r Y" � � �� �
,��. Sii:� J,.. �i• ��i'� ./�::��!� �i'�� ��ii .i •� .,�•.:�•1i• .�tr, I •ii(�.�;� -\ �ie�. .,I�� .�i��. .�:��, i �i�� ��:�'� � �•%.i 1� �.i��� r.I�.�.\
.�. .:f':;; 1;�l�}1�';!,;.� � l', iN ;�}}! �" �Ar.�!'� �1�,�,. �3. ��,;.. �i .� �i .../:
�` ,;':' �i. :4 .r. �'��`: �1.. '�'1 .:!' 'i:. .}. ,�i.,;.
i`• u•: .f� ►. ;'n' ,l;, •�� :1'
�.�•.� 'i:•:.S• f�.:•: 'i.�...�.�, �0.
:i'� 'C � 't,T. .'� t.•:• .
�. �i �'t:�i.1 :t'� '.7'� t I,i1��::!'� '„�- ��.r
�F�, .d�, :;f , i �..�,4�•i'. /' . 1 i..
. ' . .:..j. ..
'!�` ,�.� rt �� •�'"'` � . .. {" � �. �i � ..ti t� :��^1 lih :.r �9 ��.j �.t: �v 7,� '�r>
, � Y �'ti. \ '' ai ��j �' �r' '� � ��1 i5 ��
;•°:: —'���� �..-,....x�aoc.'�' •e��•' L::�fa,�' '•= r' . �� ��z ,;• p ai
' J .: .. r. . :..
•- .' ' ,� • . �, �. ..
• r :u ...Y.aWt�:_ Y'7t�s:�'.139.�c�c.har.. �+�t' ._l:
. t • x�ta�,:�� i T`" .Tl_F1'�+ir.-� ' ' .c vfla. •'N'Jk�� ,
i._- .��r.i �,•yY�i i`:�.�. �,,�x..ryi..��..:z;tu��•x i:ac^ � n^-- s _ �i�utr,':c�vn� '.cy.z�4 .�.,�!��v u..�:���..;... � , �i
j �: f � . . .. ... 4�-Ff �. r,t� 9':����:�` � .�� ..: � .,�;�,tc. .� ,. .Ear'rr. . . �i.�`., .. .r�. ,a�.:_.iu� 4;�
.i`�. � . i =.J.`�L���
v��: � t ��, '��
� STATE OF COLORADO {+ i�������;�r��
�';�..� `. i, t7,�=I: r�I'
�{ f r'" r.c 'Y�•,,}�
_,w?�'; }'Y�?• __.. ., J
�" � :=
;.��ti;;i;;:"�;;.
��'��� � ASBESTOS CONSULTING FIRM �" '-�
' ••r:. ,�a��
'.:.^.k.4( 'r.��, '::'�'� l
j '��l
'• F Colorado Department of Public Health �� � ��'= �
�e��'�.e ��� ii ::',�tj�2,J.��,
�:'� and Environment ' ���' '-t..'`
�r�'� Air Nollution Control Div ��t�•�" =�t' "'
� ision .,i;::,•
' <:;':.
.;
`�� € This ccrtifies that �{ ��^� 'r• ��:�}
, �, f ::��� .
: . ' i; 'lt,,;-,� .
�'°���� f� C B Environmental LLC �}���'��'''?�°:s�
":j' i' � 4' •�t;' 'z� �
� , ` Rcgistration No. AC[�' - 17678 � .IIj;`�
��f j; ��. ��� ���:�
'•': has met the registraiion requirements of 25-7-507, C.R.S. and the Air Quality Contro) �'
:i:�:. p �,',,;::'.,�
E ,.;�j�.. . ..�
��i`�'- ;,� Comntission Regulation No. 8, Part E3, and is hereby autl�orized to pc►•farm �tsUestos consulting �,'." �--sj`-_;�!f,,
��'`�� j� activities as required undcr Regulation No 8, Part B, in thc state of Colorado. �` '`.��;�'�=s+ �
f, , i!' :f*,�'��'�
�:;� ' �v, -�,��
, ,�,
' ; tssiicd: Octobcr 1 C), 201O . �' r ; �+' `�'`�;
� ' i �':�:,x`
, t � �� �/�,, �>i � I r,. , 1 r.�
' , Expires: Ociober 19, 2011 K..�' /(�/L f�% 1- „� 'Sr '
� ( � �,_,,, 1
;; .i \ �. •,.. : :,
�::l;:;�'�'i Authoriz APCU Representative " �•�'',;, + ��
:• ;i:
.i �' �� '�.1:; •'�'�
�I ��JJ'
� Ei SEAL !�<1��..` •�:!,�
1 '' ;;�`;�
�y� . . . . . . . . . . .
',, �� , ti y ����`
� �.;• �t :.:nr,r f . �:;�tc Y.rr•t`+fY nr Y��.: .. ihfr:rr'.1ntn.r.fi'1't r x�,.t��.i r�^' �nT.Y'Gt}:ri.:.:;i rcRt:rt Cfnr .rtM �'b1'. 11r Yi!sd1lC.hfrlY.Yttt A.�:.M:w' T.mY.•...nn°TSir.n 7�. 'T.1t1YiYl.:rcr;.»r�*ir�--.7+Yt .l�� f� ���
�_.1• .9'rZ�,�„—a • � �� `cyT.'�'}y�c ;ti ' vf�w{,'^.s ,(.1 1:� ` �iT�7'ir�;'.`� �T�T�[s 1� f� �r '.� �. , t ,o,�
.1,f t t�:K.{, :.R � t�ti� c •�� I l +� :.�' y ,� ;1
.f .t 1 :�.. l.i• �i �t.l U1 i�. !, '�'� i' ?I
Cy ts��. �' S:� •�'�,•�• t :�: 1 r s,t•�fl. ,!, � I.�' ::
� ��� �., � + �s � t~ �a' � t1.�� �� �7 .;"' •i . �� �r •,y°
s.� :'�' ;�• t �W� •� ;y, .�, i' :i' r ?� t
.. .;� : r „ a , � � ����' �� ��..!);:�'.., a ��:
�j" !�":i�•"•��• •S� / � ��/�� �f .i� v l � ;S�}. �!',ii � �: . � ,'�. . �t.� n "'�`'
d'. ���� ,�� ���, ��., u'� .h� t.�v �.� • a ij. •`t.�r,. ��!' i���r.idh.d,l'�), ••���.��. y�• •!�..'..^'• ip�tl��j� •tq''.':%'� . i.�
�1� .J�. '�1'i iii;��j� �
i� i !•• �t,t ��( i.,`� . .,' I ������� l. .Y•`! .� �i1.1�� � .\�� � / .,•�� ,,r.'•te��c .;,� , / �d��'•�'�4 \. �.! dt°��� \ .•\�-t' ..1 ��1 .�.� ;�.'.�.. �i�i'���i�1;' �'�.
���i' ` a. j'�i � �� a�}'; � ��„i� �� \ � t I• I i�� l f�� l, 1 �� '' , ���� • � , �
c,. �i / , / �1 ♦ ! 1 il��. 11���I/ t� �1 1.� � 1 1�� � .J � � �\.
�i�a�6���! ���, �i ?!ie���.4 �- �ri� r►e� � � C�ltl�i�f ' '�� ! {� I.i�� �� .�i�iM�? !1t.'1l i�}' r'. � 4, 'tl'`, � �ti�� w 1 RI,� S,� ��� ' i� �,���, i �;•
! ' i � s /�� i �\ti R/,' �' l, �. t�' / ui. �1';..
__' a r �! � °'. . _�+ ,i�e .r�� +i,l_�._�,?.�J �i� �*�� _ �i4i�� ' ���'�.. ��SW l ?. . /. \i_ �?� \i� I!, r��` ��
� e� .Y,i, . . .c� d �4�"liYi�� ����� �.i�tt�� /�� �t ��6 ,���r •e1��� ,ra;�,.,-�� . ., .�s��.��'�:�
_��_.___ -.:<'.� � s�: . tt _ r. �...�..�. i
�h �:?� /''°1 �''���, /;�..: ` w:� '"...,,\G� . / ltI .. �_' _`J'�'�" �fa^<�
u
� _. 3 `�
�� � t .-..: �
s
� Y :."� � ._ - -. . �a.
� � STATE OF COLORADO " ,,� ` t_,;� STATE OF COLOR.ADO :c;
Lx ASBESTOS • ` ' ASBESTOS '�''
F}� CERTIFICATION* � r`� * �
„ � CERTIFICATION
� - �
'+�., � Coloodo la:p�rtmcnt uf!'uhiic Heaith -:/ ,
m�J ta�ironm:m .� Colwado fkpam+�tm oi Public Hcalth
+f = � and Emironment �,
��_ . .� Air Pdlu�ion Conwl Diaision �� ,� � .4ir Pdlution C�trol Di��ision
! � f �
rn„�•m�r�m� w _%y -��.
�,Y , . - Th;s cenitia�hu �:
� ` titichael Lococo .-'� Alichael Lococo
4'- � *�
.r�'- . CcrdlkatbnKo:13J38 - - -.;7�
t_: -� Certificafi�0\O:I3i3i
�: " :;:✓
Ims mct the rtquircmeols of 2i-7-SO?.('.RS.a�11ir Qualiry Conwl � �:^_ +f�'-�'
Comnussion Rtgulation\o.8.Pan B.and is hcreby.erti�ied by the +� ����rcqwre�rcnu of a.507.C.R.S a�d Air()ualin�Conuvl �
siate of Coloialo m the follow�ng dixipiuie' ('��ssiu�Regulanon W.8.Pan B,and u hercby cenuieJ by[he Y q
��.' � sute oi Calor.wb in fic fulWwme diuiplinc: �.�
,�...:. . . �.
Buildiag Inspector*
�,� air 3tonitoring Speciaiist� �
�..■m:vwneio ;�;:`s. .:r/.
�::�;- i�a:*n�mu ?�.
� E�piresee:7:702011 �
r::pres a.:tn?noi t
I r�� &
ti��N,m��,.'m. .. . � ,
, : .,.�b..��. ,�;�,
,i •n.�=.v ..o..w.ur.n.v.r.N,...,.ru.. -�
.�.0 � r.....+..w�.+ . �....:�..�... •rd..�. �.u..n.a -
:.- p,.,,. ri....,...q.o..e.�.�:a..r>�w....:a,�.
� � :::j �..�r���.���..r.s.�r..� �:
�
�, � ..,� � 5�._ a `'�d ati _ �.
. - -,.... _ _ ..�.�. .,
�-� '! i e¢n_ s'h .w F� - _,.�,�..r._._. ,
a.lk� .. _•� w a: . . - ,-.
r c� 1" {:� r iwT,6 � � ,r 7 a+
G (l r 1..� n �r �4Ma��' G` � �'� f ' � ��
• �'•.�y�t�?=�.��-.:'1��v.:'`1'-' `�i?��t'...� � � �i'i"��,. �r3.�rt+�`.'����'t`N�?\ _ _�t�. �{j.
. 4y.,
.. :{ �_��:iF-'` �,1T"...�� �:4Jre:��r �1'„"-:�r.� � �:: 1 `4
. . .. .. _ . . _".. _ . ._. .___—__ '
� "�'z STATE OF COLORADO �r'
� ��,�
���� ''>;�
;°a^ � ASBESTOS °,
�� .� CERTiFlCATION* t�
' � . , -
r 2'r'
— �� C'ol�r�Jo 0.�panmrnt ul Puhlic Hnhh
a�u1 Faa-"uonment :S;'�.
�a ,��,roa���c�n,n�nc,u�w,
aVAl {
C�;y p , I �IhiS:MittC5�1f:11 �'�
?�� A �m� 3 � �° /�� �': Michael Lococo
' n A 2,�-. y B�o `ol�a e�encrb����:i u3s
� >C— n =ne � 5�t
'� C� � g�o ��3
� p y S > �.�q h+smntMrcq�nrcm.nuoi]5-?-W:.C.R.S.anJ:lirOw�liaCnnvol
rs �[',� ,.>,� � S�� Commissinn Ret luion\o.tt.P:m B.and is hcnb.�crniticd bv Nc
z� =_x � Q. �ue ofCnlorxlo in the iotl�ai�g dixipli�:
�ya -
n
' �O Project Designer'
�n�, i...ea:vx-,zoi� '�`�,
�m .- _
yEapi�eao�:[27,2Y12 - .
o , . /_
� ,�..�,�«.o...m:
.wR"«n w9..�.�u�..ry*m�tw.:�..w�r
....uc.o..a...�.9+•v+�:f+.�'i....
u�
_ . .. . � . . � ' „ ,i+'','k� .
355 S.Teller St,Strite 200
=� ,
�
y�� �.��', � , �.,� �,3;��.' Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
� � ~ � �� ,;��.���� ' Vail, Colorado 81657
.�� `� '"��``� ` Tel: 970-479-2128
�, �
� ��� Web: www.vailgov.com
� . ��� � Development Review Coordinator
_ � .
� -- .
.
� � �!}�� ,# ,,. �., . :, b � .e , , � �nd
_ .
� �.:
� �
. . yy� { :,t — `.r'
� p a a_LL�i�l������ ., . _� , m . $�
. � ��' `�
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
(Separate applications are required for alarm & sprinkler)
Project Street Address: Project#: P�S � I— ��� �
1 1 Z'`i y��L ���r DR.
(Number) (Street) (Suite#) DRB#:� a)1 pb9y f D�c�S pRA1101 �
Building/Complex Name:
Building Permit#:�`� — ��� �
Lot#: t 1 Block# Subdivision:
Contractor Information
Business Name: �R.M���bj� 1,1.�i51ffy �1�YUork Class: New(✓) Addition ( ) Alteration ( )
Business Address:�Va��C Z�a►�3 Type of Building:
City�t�i�(t4�Q.Q� State: GO Zip: gl�p'JZ- Single-Family(�Duplex( ) Multi-Family( )
Commercial ( ) Other( )
Contact Name: �fL�V 514�1p$
Contact PhoneE q�pl ��� • bZ,�3 Work Type: Interior( ) Exterior( ) Both (✓j
\
Contact E-Mail: C�SAN��}��Lw1$S CsR•p. �.r0�1 Valuation of
Work Included Plans Included Work
Contract istration Num e Electrical ( �es ( )No ( es ( )No ��0�
X Mechanical (,/j�es ( )No ( �es ( )No )��T
Owner/ epresentative re(Required) Plumbing (�es ( )No ( �'es ( )No ��,��0
Project Information Building ( �s ( )No ( �es ( )No � g� 0�$
Owner Name:
Value of all work being performed: $�,Orir_T
Parcel#: 2_]O j " (�9 Z„�," �S "'�3 (value based on IBC Section 109.3 8 IRC Section 108.3��
(For Parcel#,contact Eagle County Assessors OHice at(970-328-8640 or visit
www.eaglecounty.us/patie) Electrical Square Footage
Detailed Scope and Location of Work: N��.T 7�-�+�•,�., Gbt►$T2v�c.��pr-} S'�_ ��(��{�j�
St�4r•.��C'j�d.r� v�+��IC..IY��.
(use additional sheet if necessary)
For Office Use Only: Date Received: _ ._�__.�..�,�
Fee Paid: � (01 (v5.y I � �; i? �1�� � I.���� ��.�i ��
Received From: (R�3 ant�S � � t
Cash Check # g9 3 ,J�J� � 3 7nj�
CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # exp date:
,autn # TOWN OF VAIL
01-Jan-11
David Rhoades
From: Greg Sands <gsands@hermesgrp.com>
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 10:58 AM
To: David Rhoades
Cc: Greg Sands
Subject: 1127 Vail Valley Drive -Additional Info
David,
Sorry about this over sight.
Living square footage is 8,200 sf.
Plumbing Cost $61,000�'�''��
Hydronic Heat/Snow Melt $73,00
Fire Protection $31,000 —•�jL� � ���nfl0
HVAC $46,00
Electrical $65,000���t.
Let me know if you have any more questions.
Thank you,
G
Greg Sands
Hermes Group
(970) 390-0293
i
i
��
i
State of Colorado
Asbestos Testing &Abatement Requirements
Asbestos testing and abatement protects workers, homeowners, neighbors and emergency services responders from ex-
posure to harmful asbestos. It is your responsibility to be in compliance with the State. Please contact the State directly
for their requirements at the contact info listed below.
When is asbestos testina reauired?
ANY building projects disturbing more than these threshold levels of building materials require asbestos testing:
One- and Two-Family Dwellings: 32 square feet
All Others(commercial spaces, hotel rooms, etc): 160 square feet
Definition of a single-family dwelling: any dwelling unit that is used primarily for a single family, including
multi-family/condominium units,and fractional fee units.
Asbestos testing results must be provided with your application for a building permit.
Tests which identify POSITIVE results at more than 1% require abatement by a State-certified abatement contractor. The
air clearance letter or form must be submitted to the Town of Vail before the building permit will be issued.
Project Checklist
My project falls into the category checked below:
� Will not disturb more than the threshold limits identified above.
� Tested negative, or at 1% or below (1 copies of test results included)
Tested positive at more than 1%, requires abatement (1 copies of test results included)
Tips&Facts:
• Even recent construction projects may include asbestos-containing materials, so buildings of�age require testing.
• The "1989 Ban" on asbestos-containing materials is commonly misunderstood. "In fact, in 1991 the U.S. Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals vacated much of the so-called "Asbestos Ban and Phaseout" rule and remanded it to the EPA. Thus,
much of the original 1989 EPA ban on the U.S. manufacturing, importation, processing, or distribution in commerce
of many asbestos-containing product categories was set aside and did not take effect." - CDPHE
Asbestos test results should be submitted to: Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 S Frontage Rd, Vail, CO, 81657.
Town of Vail Contact: State of Colorado Contact:
Fire Prevention Bureau Colorado Department of Public Health
Vail Fire Department and Environment
75 5 Frontage Rd Asbestos Compliance Assistance Group
Fire_inspectors@vailgov.com 303-692-3158
970-479-2252 asbestos@state.co.us
www.vailgov.com www.cdphe.state.co.us
O1-Jan-11
D. J. Enviro Trust
✓anuary 3�`^, 20�9
Hermes Resart Properties
ATTN.• Mr.✓im Bick/ing
P.O. Box 2633
Edwards, CO 8�632
Re.�Lirr�ted,4sbes�as Pl�e�rr�lit✓on Sarn,o/ing Re,00rt for the�ivate Residence at 9 927 I/ail
I/alleyQ-�iue, I/ail, Cn
G�a�lVt:Bickling.�
D.J.Enuir o T�ust perfoi�ir,�d the L�ir�ted,4sbestas Screening Sur�ey ynu reque.sted fo�the
aboue proper•Ly on January25th,2t�9 9. The Work included a site uisit,and sarr�v/ing ofN/l1E
(9J Bulk PLMsarr�les, which were then analyzed at an N/ST�ccredited la,b�o�atory for 48hou�
analyticalresults. The vwrk was per��rr�ed in accordance witfii Co%rado Ai�C�a%ity Conb�ol
�uision Regulation#8,Part B. State Regulations conside�,�Lsb�stos Containing Nbterials
(AC�IiIJ to be equal to orgr�ate�than 9%tota/,4sbestos Content.
Conc/usions: The POS/T/VEACMsarr�le was l�ated in the Baserr�nt WallJoi�Corr�oound.
As the building was conslructed in 998C7,it is not unusua/to findAsbestos-containing
rraate�ials du�ing this tim�pe�iod,as rr,ranufacturers had ur�til 9988 to use up thei�stock.
What vVVS unusual was that only this ar•ea of the house co�ainedAQ'�I, The r�st ofthe
samples w�e I�EC�1711�or Less than 9%,4sbestas C�l°hErequir�s friable rr�ate�ials such as
this JointNk�te�ialbe r•err,nued p�i�to derrblition o�mr�uing when prese�in quarrtities of
greater than 32SF.in a r•esidential obv�lling, or anyarr�ount ofAQ'lil that willbe pote�ial/y
irr�oacted by the G�irbl�ion..
Recommendations:The Frrable Asbestos containing Baserr,�nt Wal/Joi�Corr�ounds in yr�u�
poter�tial Baserr�nt wor�k ar ea a�e requir�d to be rerrbued prio�to derrblition of this horr�if
theyar•e distu�bed. The use ofa C�°hE�icensedAbaterr�ntCorxractor; with Corrrr�rcia/-
Gene�aland Pollution Uabilitylnsu�ance is requireid to do this abaterr�r�t vwrk F�llowing
L�%E-permitted r err�ual,a signed G�ir,nlition Pe�rrrt Form vwuld be prouided to yr�u,the
Ol�vrier; which is requir�d to be submitte,o'to C�°ff p�io�to fur�her vwrk in the house. /will
haue the C�%EG�ir�lition Permit prepareo'fo�you when you ar•e finished and pr•ofessionally
c%ared ofanyRegulatedACNPs at this add�s This Pe�rr�t Sign-offis included in the cost of
this Screening Suruey.
Thank you for this op,aortunity to vw�k with jrou and l�rrraes Resort Properties f�ease cal/rr�
directlyat(3C�3J 2�X34�66 with any questions as to the results of this AQ'lilScreening Survey.
�ncerely,
D. ✓. ENV/RO TRUST
By.• Tony Contizano
Tony Contizano, Sr. /ndustria/Hygienist
CDPHE-AG1CD License# 9242& �5670
P.O. Box ���55�, Aurora, CO 80042
Ph.•(303J 200-4466 - Emai/.• tdd 03C�msn.com
Residential Optional Calculation _�����,y�l Haaiey Resiaence
, ,..,� Version 7.28
STEP 1 Article 220.42&220.52 Dave Peterson Electric
�sU� 8200 General Lighting load 24,600 VA PO Box 711
6 Small Appliance 9,000 VA Edwards,CO 81632
4 Laundry circuit 6,d00 VA Ph 970 926 4140 Fax 970 926 4626
Gen Lgt.Sm App&Laun.Load 39.600 VA T;i�t2o�� ��„z 1
General lighting, Sm.Appl.8 l.aundry 39,600 VA
STEP 2 Article 220.50&220.51
is con � 2,900 VA AHU 1 SkW � 5,800 VA Total Heat Load 11,600 VA
I 3.5 ton � 5,800 VA AHU 2 SkW � 5,800 VA Total CU Load 14,500 VA
I s.s ton � 5.800 VA AHU 3 seiecc � VA Central Electric Heat�65%,vs.AlC @ 100°�0 14,500 VA
A/C x4 � VA AHU 4 Select � VA
I�/c#s • VA AHU 5 ��eC � VA
STEP 3 Article 220.53 Appliance Demand Load 71,788 VA
a,soo va � � Water Heater 4,500 VA
'1,400 VA • 4 Refrigerator 5,600 VA Dryer Demand Load 28,000 VA
60o vA � 2 Freezer 1,200 VA
i,oso vn . 2 Dishwasher 2,060 VA Range Demand Load 11,000 VA
690 VA I� � Disposal 690 VA
�so vA � 1 Trash Compactor 780 VA Service Demand 85,695 VA
i,�oova � 3 Microwave 5,100VA
❑ � Central Vac VA Demand Load 357 A
340 VA I. � Mini Refrigerator 340 VA
❑� 400 VA � 2 Range hood 800 VA Neutral demand 230 A
0 sao vn � 3 Wine Cooler 1,620 VA
i,soo va . Ironing Center VA Min.Service Req. 400 A
❑ 10 hp I� Jacuzzi Tub 11,500 VA
❑ seiect � Sprinkler Pump VA Min.Feeder si2e 600
❑ Seiecc • Well Pump VA Min.Neutral size 350
seiea � Fountain Pump VA Eq. G�ding Cond. 1
?.s np � Elevator 9,200 VA � Aluminium
Pool Equip.Panel 15,798 VA Apply Demand
❑ 9600 Steamer 9,600 VA No Demand
❑ 3000 Boot Warmers 3,000 VA No Demand Total Appliance Load 71,788 VA
STEP 4 Article 220.54
Electric Clothes Dryers 28,000 VA
STEP 5 Article 220.55
Electric Ranges 8,000 W Col C demand 8,000 W
Number of apafianees 3
Cooktop Col B demana
❑Check Box for Gas Range Cooktop 3,U00 W Col B demand
Oven(s) 8,000 W Col B demanc
Oven(s) Col B demand
Number of appliances 1 Dem •_�.
Cooktop&Oven Demand Loac
.,F,�;
»»»»»»»»»»»»7»»»»»»»»»«««««G««G«««G<G«G G«<C«<C«C«<G«C<G
Pool Panel FeederCalculation �see!vo�e�� A B N Contmuous �or,-cont�n�koou
Continuous Motors 2.444 1118 111$ 0 Mators Motors
Non-continuous 1.794 897 897 0 I/2 hp � ❑ 2aov 1/a hp � ❑ � ,
Spa heater 11 kVA 1 6875 6875 t;3 hp � ❑ 2aov 1/z hp � ❑ .��_. �
Pool heater 3.5 ton p p p <,eiect � ❑ 24ov select � ❑ �- . I
Pool heater 5 ton 0 0 0 �seiect � ❑ zaav seiect � ❑ ,� , i
Pool�ight 100 � 0 100 0 100 select � ❑ ���u se�ect � ❑ �;��
Blower i����o �� 667 ❑ laov 334 334 0
other ioad 0 ❑ 24ov 0 0 Q 0.0 Motor Neutral Loac
other load 0 ❑ 240v 0 0 0
❑Co er Pool Feeder 77.698958 78 A 77 A 1 A f�lax,Unbalanced Neu?ra; '�o�c
Phase An?p�re=_ Neut load
H� Hc�E uurch-Pa�tilak�eote�hriical,lnc.
� )l.��l�t�t)UTIC4 �iE?:�zj I5�
CSlemt����,d�pnngc,Co{«rac�o�31(�1
['hc:�i�e:�i7�`-9q5-79�5
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECNNICAL �;�,�.,�i�7���,,�,�5�
e�TtaiL h�,ge.�=n,hPgeote�h.a7m
SUBSOIL STUDY
FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN
PROPOSED HADLEY RESIDENCE
LOT 11,BLOCK 6,VAIL VILLAGE 1ST FILING
1127 VAIL VALEY DRIVE
VAIL, COLORADO
JOB NO. 111 062A
APRIL 28, 2011
PREPARED FOR:
HERMES RESORT PROPERTIES
ATTN: JEFF TOWNSEND
P. O.BOX 2633
EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632
(j townsend@hermesgrp.com)
f�.�rker 3t13-�;�}1-7119 * C���1c�radoS��rinoc 7It)-633-�5fi2 • �ilti��rt}�«rite �)lt-4C�£�-1��'s�
�
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PUR.POSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY........................................................................- 1 -
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION.................................................................................- 1 -
SITECONDITIUNS................................................................................................... -2 -
FIELDEXI'LORATION............................................................................................ -2-
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS..................................................................................- 2 -
FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS ...............................................................-3 -
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................-3 -
FOUNDATIONS....................................................................................................-3 -
FOUNDATION AND RETAINPVG WALLS.........................................................-4 -
FL04RSLABS...................................................................................................... - 6-
UNDERDRAINSYSTEM......................................................................................- 6 -
SURFACEDRAINAGE......................................................................................... - 7 -
DRYWELLS ..........................................................................................................- 7 -
LIIvIITATIONS .......................................................................................................... - S -
FIGURE 1 -LOCATIONS OF EXPLORA.TORY BORINGS
FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES
FIGURE 4- SWELL-CONS4LIDATION TEST RESULTS
FIGURE 5 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS
TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABQRA.TORY TEST RESULTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY
This report pzesents the resuIts af a subsoil study for the proposed Hadley residence to be
located on Lot 1 l, BIock 6, Vail Village lst Filing, 1 I2'7 Vail Valley Drive. The project
site is shown on Pigure 1. The puYpose of the study was to develop recommendations for I
the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for I
geotechnical enguaeering services to Hermes Resort Praperties dated Apri15, 201 l. ',
A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain
information on the subsnrface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the
field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, and other
engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and Iaboratory testing
were analyred to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable
pressures for the proposed building fotiudation. This report sum2narizes the data obtained
during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other
geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the
subsurface conditions encountered.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The residence will be a two story wood frame structure over a walkout basement level
with an attached garage located on the lot as shown on Figure l. Ground floors will be
slab-on-grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths
between about 4 to 10 feet. Approximate assumed floor slab elevations are shown on
Figure 2. We assume relatively light foundation Ioadings, typical of the proposed type of
construction. The existing residence on the lot will be removed for the new construction.
If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from#hose described
above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report.
Job No. 111 062A A CG�teCh
- z -
SITE CONDITIONS
The lot is occupied by an existing residence as shown on Figw-e 1. The residence was
apparently built in the late 1970's and includes a basement level. The ground surface has
undergone some grading from the previous development. The terrain is strongly to
moderately steep sloping down to the north at grades from about 5 to 12%. EIevation
dif�'erence across the proposed building is about 5 to 6 feet and across the lot is about 10
to 12 feet. Vegetation consists of grass, landscape bushes and tall pine trees. Up to about I�'�
2 feet of snow covered the site at the time of our field exploration. I
FIELD EXPLORATION
The field exploration for the project was conducted on April 14, 2011. Two exploratory
borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface
conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers
powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The b�rings were logged by a
representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1'/s inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The
samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound
hammer failing 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described
by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication ofthe
relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken
and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs af Exploratory Borings,
Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer
and testing.
S2atted PVC pipe was installed in the borings to allow monitoring of the groundwater
levels. Depths that PVC pipe were installed in the borings are shown on Figure 2.
SUBSURFACE CONDITI4NS
Grapluc Iogs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shawn on Figure 2.
The subsoils, below about 4%Z to 51/� feet of existing fill, consisted of inedium dense,
Job No. I l 1 062A �t�n
1
- 3 -
slightly silty sand and gravel with cobbles underlain at depths from about 14 to 16 feet by
relatively dense, slightly silty sandy gravel and cobbles with boulders that extended down
to the maximum depth drilled of 21 feet. Drilling in the dense, coarse granular soils with
auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was
encountered in the deposit. The fill was clayey silty sand with gravel and scattered
cobbies that was loose to medium dense and contained some topsoil.
Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural
moisture content, density and gradation analyses. The results of swell-consolidation
testing performed on the more sandy natural sails, shown on Figure 4, indicate moderate
compressibility under loading after wetting. The samples were probably partly disturbed
due to the rock content. Results of gradation analyses performed on a small diameter
drive sample(minus 1'/z inch fraction)of the sand and gravel subsoils are shown on
Figure 5. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1.
No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 1
and 6 days later. The subsoils were slightly moist to moist.
FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS
The natural granular soils possess moderate bearing capacity and relatively low
settlement potential. Spread footings bearing on these soils are suitable for foundation
� support of the building. Existing fill and topsoil may need to be removed below footings
in some areas.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
FOUNDATIONS
Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the
nature o€the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread
footings bearing on the natnral granular soils.
Job No. 111 062A �t�
- 4-
The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread
� footing foundation system.
1} Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be
designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Based �n
experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as
discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. There could be a low
potential for additional settlement from wetting of the bearing soils.
2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous
walls and 2 feet for isolated pads.
3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided
with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection.
Placement of foundations at least 48 inches belaw exterior grade is
typically used in this area.
4) Continuous foundation wa11s should be reinforced top and bottom to span
local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12
feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures shonld also be
designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation
and Retaining Walls" section of this repart.
5) All debris, existing fill, topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be
removed and the footing bearing levet extended down to the firm natural
granular soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened
and compacted.
6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing
excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions.
FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS
Foundation walls and retaining structures which are lateraIly supported and can be
expected to undergo onty a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral
earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf
for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. Cantilevered retaining structures
Job No. 111 062A C���h
- 5 -
which are separate from tk�e residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to
mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth
pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 40 pcf for
backfill consisting ofthe on-si#e granular soils. The wa11 backfill should not contain
debris, topsoil or oversi�ed rocks.
All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and
surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and
equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the
walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a watt or an upward
sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or
retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure
buildup behind walls.
Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90%of the maximum
standard Proctor density at a moisture oontent near optimum. Backfill in pavement arxd
walkway areas should be compacted to at Ieast 95%of the maximum standard Proctor
density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment
near the wali, since this could cause excessive Iateral pressure on the wall. Some
settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is
placed conreetly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. Use
of a select granular material, such as base course, and compacting the backfill to at least
98% standard Proctor density could be done to mitigate the settlement potential.
The lateral resistance of foundatzon or retaining wall footings wi11 be a combination of the
sIiding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure
against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be
caleuiated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.45. Passive pressure of compacted
backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit
weight of 350 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended
above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the
Job No. 111 062A �t�h
- 6 -
design to limit the strain which wiil occur at the ultimate strength,particularly in the case
of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads
should be a granular material compacted to at least 95%of the maximum standard Proctor
density at a moisture content near optimum.
�LOOR SLABS
The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoiI, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab-
on-grade constniction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs
should be separated from alI hearing walls and columns with expansion joints which
allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce
damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab
reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended
slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath
basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch
aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2%passing the No.
200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 9S%of
maxiznum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can
consist ofthe on-site granular soils devoid ofdebris, topsoil and oversized rocks.
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM
Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our
experience in mountainous areas that local perched groundwater can develop during times
of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoffcan also
create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining
walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected frot�z wetting and hydrostatic pressure
buildup by an underdrain system. An underdrain around the garage portion of the
building should not be needed due to the at grade construction.
Job No. 1 I I Q62A `�tECh
- 7-
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall back�ll
surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should
be placed at each level af excavation and at Ieast 1 foot below lowest adjacent fuiish
grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular
material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2%passing the No. 200
sieve, less than 50%passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The
drain gravel backfill should be at least 1'/2 feet deep and be covered with filter fabric.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and
maintained at all times after the residence has been campleted:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during coi�struction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted ta near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95%of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90%of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 2%2 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge we11 beyond the limits of all
backfill.
5) Landscaping which requ�res regular heavy irrigation should be located at
least 5 feet from foundation walls.
DRYWELLS
A drywell is pzoposed at the site to dispose of surface water run-off. The drywell will be
located in the northwestern comer of the lot. The natural granular subsoils at the site
Job No. 111 062A �t��
- 8 -
should possess good to very good infiltration characteristics and groundwater level at the
site is apparently relatively deep. Based on these considerations and our experience in the
area, drywells appear feasible at the site with proper design and construction.
The drywells should be located at least 10 feet from the residence. The drywells should
have solid pipe from the ground surface to below adjacent basement floor elevation. The
drywells should be provided with overflow in the event the drywell capacity is exceeded.
The foundation wn.derdrain system for the basement level of the residence should not
discharge into same drywell used to dispose of surface water as back-up into the
underdrain system could occur. We can review the drywell design if desired.
LIMITATTONS
This study has been conducted in accordance with genexally accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either
express or implied. The conetusions and recommendations sabmitted in this report are
based upon the data obtained from the exploratory horings drilled at the locations
indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of constnzction and our experience in the area.
Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or
other biological contaminants (MOBC) deveioping ui the future. If the client is
concemed about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of praetice shoutd be
consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapotation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface
conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions
encountered during construetion appear different from those described in this report, we
should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exciusive use by our client for design purposes. We
are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the
project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our reeommendations, and to
Job No. 111 062A C�tGCh
- 9- �
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
Respectfully Submitted,
HEPWORT - WLAK���CHNICAL, INC.
,t��� t���
�` � "�G'�`S �f�i
� j y ''.
�
� t G ;Q;
.. . : �
w = • +r
David A. Young, � ' 2_ '�s : �
��0�'4.��L��f it'��..�
Reviewed by: �i��t��,��`'����
� ��f� 1111it����,
Steven L. Pawlak, P.E.
DAY/ksw
cc: Hermes Resort Properties—Jim Bicklutg(jbickling,�a�hennes�r�.com)
Boundaries Unlimited—Phil Harris (Phil(�n,bu-inc.com}
Job No. I 11 062A �,�t�
� - � �
. � �
�� . . �
� APPROXIMATE SCALE:
,i ' 1�� - 30'
I '••- '``
.�I�
( � �
� l �
. �,,,� � �
� �� � � . . _/
. �`i�~
�� �.
..� I ''� � �
�� "'--'L7- � PROPOSED
��
RESIDENCE
,..
"' - , � ---_
LOT 7,PART OF LOT 8& i ° !�\'�
� CUL-DE-SAC ,.: � � ��b
a� �
. • • -.�
� ,
_---- � .�',`i
r, �s � _��.�_
� _ .
� i - ;� ° � � ' �
..�,.i . _ _' _�li Il �� v�. " `
`
._-_.-� � �� .
f� � �Y '-,, �
IJ . � � � J J ' =
/ , // � �//��\` , � l- ' \
�� d
_,�._.._` n _ . . J� � �'`t:��
`-,, ING� �. J �
�
1
I � 'r �_: \ ' � •
I ?�' t . t' � I '��1
' 1 4
'� ��� � ♦ '�� � ��'J!I
I � r' J _��',,,' J
� 'f�� i � J_ � d
� 7F • - � - ��'�%n>>� Q
��:� � '�i `�������
� �� i � � � � ,�i`f�,'t! � -�s �r� �l~ �
I � ^,� :> �"*"^ .. � .
� � � �li, ,� � BORING 2 � � �--- �' -�''"
:.- ,,� ' iL� � ..�-
� �
a:� � '� � i � ' — � !�,5, I I
_ '�� ,`";� /����� �� � �� �� I
� 1� .. � �;;i✓
� � ��- �./,
d
_y1.-,- � �� �� �~
f
^�. ^ �
, ��\i� _-_ . . . . ..
J '� `- -. �-,�' l„�„�\..e �' w� �LVA� pR,�
V
BENCH MARK Lot Comer Pin;
Elev.=8245'.From CoMOUrs
EXISTING RESIDENCE
1127 VAIL VALLEY DRIVE
(SHADED)
H
111 062A ��'�E� LOCATI�NS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 1
HEPWOfi�N-PAWtAK GEOifCHNiCA1
I
BORING 1 BpRING 2
ELEV.=8245.5' ELEV.=8245'
8250
8250
Aswmed Main Floor Elevation
Assumed Garage Floor FJevation �,
�
8245 '
8245
��12 WC=14.6
-20p=� 23/12
WG=92
8/6,22/6 -200=25
824� WC=22
-200=s 10/6,10/6 8240
E' 1$/12 �
W Assumed Basement Floor Elevation
�' 49/12 WC=2.6 W
, DD=101 �y
Z 8235 21/12 '
� 231�2 8235 Z
F=- WC=1.9 �
Q +4=28 �"
W -200=9 j
W J
0
56J12 W
8230 ''
35/12 8230
�• wc=a.�
° . o�=�i2
:4= -200=i 1
'a> o•'
'°�' a7/��
8225 '
.4` 73/12 8225
8220 8220
NOTE: Explanation of symbois is shown on Figure 3.
111 062A �-��:VtE�..'CI"~! LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2
y��wo.�rt+-aawwc c�o�c�,v�caz
LEGEND:
� FILL; man-placed, clayey silty sand and gravel with scattered cobbles, loose to medium dense, moist, dark
brown, mixed with some topsoil.
� SAND AND GRAVEL(SM-GM};with cobbles, possible bauiders, slightly silty, medium dense, siightly moist to
moist, light brown to brown, rocks are primarily subrounded.
� GRAVEL AND COBBL.ES (GM);with boulders, sandy, slightly silty, dense to very dense, moist, brown, rocks are
primarily subrounded.
hRelatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I.D. California liner sample. I
r ,
�
� Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPI�, 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample,ASTM D-1586.
�8�12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 18 blows of 140 pound hammer faliing 30 inches were required to drive
the California or SPT sampler 12 inches.
� Indicates 1z'--inch diameter siotted PVC pipe installed in the boring to the depth shown.
� Practical drilling refusal.
NOTES:
1. Exploratory borings were driiled on Aprii 14, 2011 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger.
2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan
pravided.
3. Elevations of exploratory borings were measured by instrument level and refer to the Bench Mark shown on Figure 1.
4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the
method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between
material rypes and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checkedl and 6 days later. Fluctuation in
water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content (%)
DD = Dry Density(pcf)
+4 = Percent retained on the No.4 sieve
-200 = Percent passing No.200 sieve
111 062A ` '�>'�i�� L.EGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 3
FiEpWQRTH-�AWtAK GfOiECHNiCAi
Moisture Content= 2.6 percent
_,---- Dry Density = 101 pcf
Sample of:Siightly Silty Sand with Gravel
From: Boring 2 at 7 Feet
0
� ----
� 2 --
z
Compress+on `
O upon
� 3 wetting
W ------ ------ -- --
�
a
� 4
O ------ ----- '
V ------
5
s
o.� i.o �o �oo
APPLIED PRESSURE (ksf)
Moisture Content= 4.5 percent
__ Dry Density = 112 pcf
Sample of:Slightly Silty Sand with Gravel
From:Boring 2 at 15 Feet
Q
� — --
�
z 2
� � Compression
W upon
� 3 wetting
a ------ — --- ------
�
O
U 4
� -----
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE (ksf)
,,H�,�'
111 062A �=�E�'fF�'C�1 SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 4
;��awo�-�awwr�eor�cHwica�
HYDROMEfER ANAtYSIS IEVE ANALYSIS
TIME READWGS U.S.STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENMIGS
2�Ffi. 7 Hfl
tSMIN. 15MM1. 66MIN.79MML tMIN. 1 MIN. �ZW FiqO I50 r30 I18 f8 /A 3/B' 3�1' 11l2' 8' S S 8'
0 ��
�
10 �
( � �
� BO
{ I
30 ... I 70 II
!
W 4� 80 (}
Z � Z
� � �
� a
Z 50 � Z
U � ' U
w � W
a � ao a
,
7o I �
30
E
� � I �
i
!
� ,a
I
,� a
,001 .002 .pp5 .ppg .079 037 A76 .150 .30p .80p 7.18 2.38 4.75 B.S 12.5 19.0 37.5 782 t2�152 207
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS
�� GRAVEL
CLAY TO StIT ��g
FlI� MEDWM COAR$E FlNE CQAR9E
Gravel 28 °� Sand 63 °rb Silt and Clay 9 %
Liquid Limit 9', Plasticity Index °�
Sample of: Sightly Siity Sand and Gravel From: Boring 1 at 10 Feet
111 062A �`�'—"��"'���� GRADATION TEST RESU�TS FIGURE 5
HEPVYQ�H•AAWU�K GwO�zCHNItAL
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 1 Job No.m o62a
SUMMARY OF IABORATORY TEST RESUL75
SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAI a��ATiON ATTERBER(;LIMi7'S
MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PERCENT UNCONFINED
BORING DEPTH PASSING L►QUiD p��� COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR
CONTEN'f DENSI7Y N0.200 UMIT IIVDEX STRENGTH
{�) (%� BEDROCK TYPE
��! tx1 1 c� s��
NGl (%} (PSF!
1 2 14•6 26 Clayey Silty Sand and
Gravel (Fill}
4 2•2 9 Slzght y S�lty and and
Gravel
10 1.9 28 63 9 Slightly ilty Sand and
Gravel
z � 9•2 25 C ayey Silty Sand and
Gravel (Fill)
� 2•6 1�1 Slightly Si ty and with
Gravel
15 4.5 112 11 Slightly Silty Sand wrth
Gravel
�
�
�;
6
k
§
!
'� q;
s (
l
�
� '°��'��J�t ��:'�' �
� �
Oas i gn 6 rou �p �
�
STRUCTURAL EXPERTISE• PRAGTICAL SOIUTIONS a��
February 29, 2oi2 �
�
t
�
Mr. Greg Sands �
�
Hermes Resort Properties �
P.O. Box 2633 ���
Edwards,Colorado 8i632 �
�
�,
�
:
x:
STRUCTURAL CONFOIi;MANCE SUMMARY �
,
Project Name: Hadley Residence �
ii2�Vail Valley Drive �Vail,Colorado r:
SDG Project Number: ii-oi� ;
Mr. Sands, �
�
Representatives from our office have visited the project site as requested. The purpose of �
this observation was to observe roof, wall, and floor framing conditions, as well as the �
overall progress of the building. �
t
�
�
In general,this observed framing work appeared to be in substantial conformance with the ;
Structural Documents anti design intent. In summary,we are satisfied with structural floor, �
wall,and roof framing condifions for this building. �
�
If you have any questions,please feel free to contact our office. Thank you.
Report Submitted By: �
�
SUNDQUIST DESIGN GROUP, INC. ,,,...., �
Residential Services D'zvision ��;''o►`Y�o �'•.�
4 . .
. .
• • �
. �.
15 • �
:
.
. . 1 �.
� . .�� �
Jose D. S ,P.E. '• `'�
111.
tncanformance
�
�
1 t
h� �
♦
11-05-2012 Inspection Request Reporting Page 1
4:20 pm Vail, C� - Citv Of
Requested Inspect Date: Tuesday November 06, 2012
Site Address: 1127 VAtL VALLEY DR VAIL
A/P/D Information
Activity: 611-0215 Type: COMBO Sub Type: NSFR Status: ISSUED
Const Type: Occupancy: Use: R-3 Insp Area:
Owner: HADLEY, PHILIP A.
Contractor: HERMES MOUNTAIN CLASSICS LLC Phone: 970-926-1720
Description: NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Requested Inspection(s)
Item: 190 ELEC-Final Requested Time: 11:30 AM
Requestor: HERMES MOUNTAIN CLASSICS LLC Phone: 970-926-1720
Comments: 904-1 4
Assigned To: "' Entered By: JMONDRAGON K
Action: Time Exp:
Inspection Historv
Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING
09/14/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: Need to see interior footings OK per Sl.report
10/26/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: all interior pads
Item: 20 BLDG-Foundation/Steel "`Approved*`
10/07/11 Inspector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
—�ttem: 21 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan
�item: 22 PLAN-ILC FRAMING
Item: 30 BLDG-Framing
03/01/12 Inspector:, sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: Roof framing only ok per engineer letter
04/04/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: DN DENIED
Comment: Framing complete and ok per engineer letter that is scanned
Need to provide all SI rep orts
Need Framing ILC and Foundation ILC
Checked U-values on windows all OK
OK to insulate
Item: 50 BLDG-Insulation ""A� pproved`*
04/10/12 Inspe�ctor: JRM Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: LOWER LEVEL ONLY
04/11/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 60 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail "*Approved`*
04/13/12 Inspe�ctor: JRM Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: LOWER LEVEL.... MECH ROOM AND ELEVATOR SHAFT ARE NOT DONE. PARTIAL
APPROVAL ON THE REST OF LOWER LEVEL OK
04/26/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 70 BLDG-Misc.
Item: 110 ELEC-Service "`Approved*"
08/31/12 Inspector: nsc Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: trench only
09/07/12 Inspector: nchand Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 120 ELEC-Rough **Approved'*
04/04/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: DN DENIED
REPT131 Run Id: 14988
�
� �� 1l- d� rc�
11-07-2012 Inspection Request Reporting Page 1
4:40 pm Vail, C� - Citv Of
Requested Inspect Date: Thursday, November O8, 2012
Site Address: 1127 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL
A/P/D Information
Activity: 611-0215 Type: COMBO Sub Type: NSFR Status: ISSUED
Const Type: Occupancy: Use: R-3 Insp Area:
Owner: HADLEY, PHILIP A.
Contractor: HERMES MOUNTAIN CLASSICS LLC Phone: 970-926-1720
Description: NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Requested Inspectionls)
Item: 533 PLAN-TEMP.C/O eq ested Time: 08:30 AM
Requestor: HERMES MOUNTAIN CLASSICS LLC Phone: 970-926-1720
Comments 390-0293
Assigned To: BGIBSON ��� Entered By: JMONDRAGON K
Action: Time Exp:
� � I S, I'a--
� Item: 539 PW-FINAL C/O Requested Time: 08:00 AM
Requestor: HERMES MOUNTAIN CLASSICS LLC Phone: 970-926-1720
'+ Comments: 390-0293
Assigned To: LSANDOVAL Entered By: JMONDRAGON K
Action: Time Exp:
�� ��
��� �7��.+nl.� � � i �L -�" o�2 `4 c��
--� � -�5
� � P
���1 i�' �� �,r,�s.�' �� ��
��e
�
�
� �IG��►�S�apr
"�
Inspection Historv '�,�(�O(' ��G��l /�q
Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING � �
09/14/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: Need to see interior footings OK per Sl.report
10/26/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: all interior pads
Item: 20 BLDG-Foundation/Steel "'Approved#`
10/07/11 Inspector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 21 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan
Item: 22 PLAN-ILC FRAMING
Item: 30 BLDG-Framing
03/01/12 Inspector:, sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: Roof framing only ok per engineer letter
04/04/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: DN DENIED
Comment: Framing complete and ok per engineer letter that is scanned
Need to provide all SI rep orts
Need Framing ILC and Foundation ILC
Checked U-values on windows all OK
OK to insulate
Item: 50 BLDG-Insulation "`Approved'"
04/10/12 Inspe�ctor: JRM Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: LOWER LEVEL ONLY
04/11/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 60 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail `*Approved**
04/13/12 Inspector: JRM Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: LOWER LEVEL.... MECH ROOM AND ELEVATOR SHAFT ARE NOT DONE. PARTIAL
APPROVAL ON THE REST OF LOWER LEVEL OK
04/26/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED
REPT131 Run Id: 14618
� I / I �v ��a� � �
�
07-08-2013 Inspection Request Re[�orting Page 1
4•13�m Vail, CO - C�t� �f i
I
RequestedSite Addr�ess: 1127 VA�L VKLL�Y DR VAIL I�
I
A/P/D Information i
Activity: 611-0215 Type: COMBO SubType: NSFR Status: ISSUED
Const Type: Occupancy: Use: R-3 Insp Area:
Owner: HADLEY, PHILIP A.
Contractor: HERMES MOUNTAIN CLASSICS LLC Phone: 970-926-1720
Description: NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Reauested Insaection(s)
ftem: Requested Time: 08:15 AM
Requestor: — "'"'LL Phone: 970-926-1720
�
Comments: 390-0293
Assigned To: BGIBSON Entered By: JMONDRAGON K
Action: ime Exp:
ftem: 540 BLDG-Final C/ Requested Time: 08:00 AM
Requestor: Phone:
Comments: �
Assigned To: SGREMMER Entered By: JMONDRAGON K
Action: Time Exp:
� �: j
3
�,
:{
� _ _
��
A�TM�
�..#:a
���
:�.,�;�;
��
��a��
�� Inspection Historv
�± Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING
09/14/11 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: Need to see injerior footings OK per SI report
x��f 10/26/11 Inspector. sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
� Comment: all mterior pads
Item: 20 BLDG-Foundation/Steei "Approved"
;. 10/07/11 Inspector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
Item: 21 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan
� Item: 22 PLAN-ILC FRAMING
��; Item: 30 BLDG-Framing "Approved"
��„ 03/01/12 Inspector:. sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
qM� Comment: Roof framing only ok per engineer letter
, t 04/04/12 Inspector: sg remmer Action: DN DENIED
Comment: Framing complete and ok per engineer letter that is scanned
Need to provide all SI rep orts
Need Framing I�C and Foundation ILC
Checked U-values on windows all OK
�,: ° OK to insulate
� ' 11/16/12 Inspector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED
� Comment:
� Item: 50 BLDG-Insulation Ap proved"
��; 04/10/12 Inspector. JRNI Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
Comment: LOWER LEVEL ONLY
��;ff 04/11/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
�� Item: 60 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail "Approved"
-� 04/13/12 Inspector: JRM Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION
�� Comment: LOW ER LEVEL.... MECH ROOM AND ELEVATOR SHAFT ARE NOT DONE. PARTIAL
�, APPROVAL ON THE REST OF LOW ER LEVEL OK
04/26/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED
Comment:
. Item: 110 ELEGService "Approved**
REPT131 Run Id: 14679