Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRB110355 ���i�r� I���i�� ���r��l ��TI��I F�F�1�1 � - � � � ����rtrr��r�t �f ��r�r��r�i�� ����I��r��r�� # �.� ����� Fr�r�t��� F����� ��i I� ��I�r���� �1�.�� ��I: ���.���.�1�� f��; ���,���.��.�� �1�1.��1'-'i C�wEL��i_�- ���� ���.��I�������f�l Project Name: SHAY RESIDENCE EXTERIOR CHANGE DRB Number: DR6110355 Project Description: REBUILD DECK, NEW RAILINGS, NEW COVERED STAIRWELL, UNDER DECK STORAGE, 2 OPEN AWNINGS, NEW PAVERS, LANDSCAPING, PATIO, NEW SLIDING GLASS DOORS Participants: OWNER SHAY, RUSSELL J. 08/15/2011 PO BOX 4612 VAI L CO 81658 APPLICANT K.H. WE66 ARCHITECTS PC 08/15/2011 Phone: 970-477-2990 710 WEST LIONSHEAD CIR, UNIT A VAI L CO 81657 License: C000001627 ARCHITECT K.H. WE66 ARCHITECTS PC 08/15/2011 Phone: 970-477-2990 710 WEST LIONSHEAD CIR, UNIT A VAI L CO 81657 License: C000001627 Project Address: 4545 BIGHORN RD VAIL Location: Legal Description: Lot: D Block: Subdivision: WOODRIDGE TOWNHOUSES Pa rcel N u m ber: 2101-124-1700-6 Comments: SUBMITTED APPLICATION IS INCOMPLETE BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Action: VOID Second By: Vote: Date of Approval: Conditions: Planner: Bill Gibson DRB Fee Paid: $20.00 Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road TOWN OF VAIL` va�i, co$iss� Tel:970-479-2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator Application for Design Review D !� � Minor Exterior Alteration r AUG 1 � ?�1� i�� General Information: This application is required for all proposals involving minor chang t buildings and site improv2�=� ments, such as roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping,fences, retaining walls, tc. Ti���l�ail(✓�r� Code sections can be found at www.vailqov.com under Vail Information—Town Code Online. All projects requiring de- sign review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department, as outlined in the submittal requirements. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval expires one year from the date of approval, unless a building per- mit is issued and construction commences. Fee: $250 for Multi-Family/Commercial $20 for Single Family/Duplex �Single Family Duplex _ Multi-Family Commercial �h�'""J Description of the Request: � (�2e(.K � �SOU.�'�1 �J YQ�I�iVJ `�/y�'� Z ° �St�v' Y��v / w ' Physical Address: ��J Of V s��� ✓�Q� Parcel Number: 2)��' � OD (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no. ��-S Property Owner: �Q Mailing Address: '�• ��x �(Q� Z �QC�� C,� QJ��D��j . P e �7D - y7lo�28�}3 Owner's Signature: Primary Contact/ Owner R pr sent ive: �G �� � W�� / Mailing Address: �� Qvt ✓ � V��l I �,!? �(�5�7 Phone: 97D ' �/77 2 9�a E-Mail: j���1��lG��J •Cf�!'� Fax: �'7�• 2-��,� _! For Office Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa/MC Last 4 CC# Exp. Date: Auth# Check# /�'�7 Fee Paid: �J � Received From: r ,�,"/�!'./I�r�. ��:�,<S � 2/, � Meeting Date: DRB No.: �r Ib��1��� Planner: Project No: �1�.� �) —U��� Zoning: Land Use: Location of the Proposal: Lot:�_Block:�_Subdivision: i�,c;�'{t,�,�i, _�i�� **+�******+*************+++�*************************+***********+******+**�**************** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprinted on 08-15-2011 at 10:41:38 08/15/201 1 Statement **********************+***��***********«************+**********************************.**.* Statement Number: R110000986 Amount: $20. 00 08/15/201110:40 AM Payment Method: Check Init: SAB Notation: 1207 - SAMANTHA BOGASH ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: DRB110355 Type: DRB-Minor A1t,SFR/DUP Parcel No: 2101-124-1700-6 Site Address: 4545 BIGHORN RD VAIL Location: Total Fees: $20.00 This Payment: $20.00 Total ALL Pmts: $20.00 Balance: $0.00 **************************************************+****************+************************ ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------------- ------------------------------ ------------ DR 00100003112200 DESIGN REVIEW FEES 20.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- • ' . �- , �,, � , y . N, , � -�; � � �; �� ;,�� x� E; t �� ;�� �� �r .x� � � �� t� � �` , � °� ,�� :� �,c ��rc> { � - y:; , !4>��y ' � . k 'gr � ��, � ... � ... . "^'� c a r� a � � �'�� �� � � � � � _ '�, ��,���' ,�' � . M , /f,{r � . :. �� - ,,� ;� ��f � �- - -r i r � f> ��"��""'�.-.�~£',.,_ ,�/ � f�~ � �`' _ � /,��/} ��}�4�`..'`,�tti.��h'?s�_,k�"�'�/ ff x� ����'ti� . . ._ I( �`�++.�.. � r i � ♦ f- �,,�r �-. �`����``� �� , �`�.... �� ` �k +:. � �1.� 1. � �_.: _ `'�. � F i f i �, s�� 1 '�iJ�f'f' .Ci�'�`'�� ��/ r z: I F�* �.� c �=t � .1�� f � .� l„�� '�^�--.:.;�/ ':. ' b ����_. _ (,��,r� � . � ../ �� �`,) .Y `'".. r ' �/ / � .• ��� ^. "_. F � ' 7/lrr r�� , x: ` �S '�-::��,s� `�;" �f" ' r�� ° ,rFll��f ' �J�� ��� � .� ; a ,� , lG/�?,�� �.% !!' ��"`��`��-����--�----�-�-'. ,.__.,,�:., ,r/�E�'rf��f �- { z _6 '' � '�r,�`�� //,{�7�� = _,_�;�-J� J////,, g s �� '�, �r�:;!/I �f�, - _ �- .'f�/�:-� � r-.- „ � ��� �.�---f ' .�. . �j�j �f '�/,,� -_ � T5— '�� s. ,. .,_,� .3R:� ; ,I,, , ,, . _ _'``'�'••�;� _ �-'°gs`�{.`'�'-�..�_.- ,t� f -�.'� - ��,n.�; '�+-r...i„� ����r r 1 '-�,�f� �� r�-�-u , °� _ � � ; � ' ; - . . fljI jrfr �� �// r � �.s� ��^-,-�.. ��:. �//�r��`�� �f�` �l �. ,� .-� ,_.. ,=..°,�_� _"+--� ��n.. .,.. �+ . _ . �.r+r_.c,a_�.v ,���'1/�/��/,j�lr!�jJ` ��. ���! � .r- ' f, .f�,� _"�" :�a`-'.a^'*.y+t�w, " +..��- ---..:�„_�.�_`, 'f:/'/ f I ����� ����/� ;� �-,'__"y`� �.�..t �y'� �- �; r f : !�� �' -r--' � "`,°v;e; "�'�„--�. ;f�r+,� ''Y '1lr� ;� - � � .�.,,..—:�.`--'-��x ���,� �,� ��-- .�__�_..�� �, ,, , .._.,}/� � '�,"'"�§ �,��/ � � 1"�" i �r.,y• �' ,� .. -rtn. ��:!"''�r� 'r�r -.-.° s � � � w\ I = ,��, � / r�/� �, �,�: ,� ` ` _ : � � ��/r _�" x, -"� �'•.. �� _ �{�1 -�. �`' 'a`� / ,'`,t .'�,: •� � ij' . ��. . . . �\.. p ��• r �;F'r k �� ��` 4�A �` v�-,'h. r : `^* i �. �, � �.. � �� �_ � .i :b �? ,: ,. '?�� ,� � w. �•R�r �tr �• ���' �°'t.,r� � h� w i�,Y ; Y�� .. . . - ;�5t�'�\�r � �'?y� y � �.f� � t�'•<..� __. . . A 3r �eh?`s P. ,�'- _ . . -- ._. _ �._ S. � i1 .� � h y'� � `� ro��u Q� v►��� �� 75 South Frontage Roac# Vlfest Community aevelo�ment Department VaF�, Coiorado 81657 97D.479.213� Vailgo�.com 97C1.479.2452 fax 8/23/11 Dear Kyle, The Community Development Department has received a Minor Exterior Alteration design review application (DRB110355) for new decks, stairs, awnings, storage areas, pavers, landscaping, windows/doors, etc. at 4545 Bighorn Road. This application is incomplete can not be processed as submitted. The proposed storage areas are defined as new gross residential floor area (GRFA) and site coverage. Therefore, an Addition design review application must be submitted rather than a Minor Exterior Alteration application. The Woodridge Townhomes are zoned Residential Cluster District and all eight units (Parcels A-E) are treated as one entity for zoning purposes. Therefore, this proposal involves a Multi- Family, rather than Single-Family, development proposal. Since the Woodridge Townhomes is a multiple-family development, homeowner association approval is required (sign-off from each individual owner is required if there is no association) to be submitted with any design review application. Additionally, all zoning calculations must be based upon the Woodridge Townhomes development site as a whole and not one individual parcel. For your reference, I have attached a copy of a May 12, 2005 letter from the Community Development Department to Jennifer Shay outlining the development potential for the Woodridge Townhomes. Attached to this archived letter was a zoning analysis from your office dated January 28, 2005. If you wish to pursue this proposal, please submit a complete Addition design review application with all necessary submittal requirements (including HOA approval, utility approvals, full-size plans, zoning calculations based on the whole site, etc.) Sincerely, ��..�-�Ir. �_ Bill Gibson, AICP Town Planner Community Development D�si�r� F���riew �o�r+d #�CTI�3N F�I�M # - � � D�partm�nt nf �Community G�velapm�nt ���� �� ' 75 Sauth Fr�c�n�a�� Road, �"ail, Col or-ada� 8165� t��: 97�Q.479.21�9 IF�a�; 97�,479.2�1-52 c•�.�,u���oewLU�a,���- w�b� u�rwt�.�a��lgav,c:om Project Name: SHAY RESIDENCE EXTERIOR CHANGE DRB Number: DRB110355 Project Description: REBUILD DECK, NEW RAILINGS, NEW COVERED STAIRWELL, UNDER DECK STORAGE, 2 OPEN AWNINGS, NEW PAVERS, LANDSCAPING, PATIO, NEW SLIDING GLASS DOORS Participants: OWNER SHAY, RUSSELL J. 08/15/2011 PO BOX 4612 VAI L CO 81658 APPLICANT K.H. WEBB ARCHITECTS PC 08/15/2011 Phone: 970-477-2990 710 WEST LIONSHEAD CIR, UNIT A VAI L CO 81657 License: C000001627 ARCHITECT K.H. WEBB ARCHITECTS PC 08/15/2011 Phone: 970-477-2990 710 WEST LIONSHEAD CIR, UNIT A VAI L CO 81657 License: C000001627 Project Address: 4545 BIGHORN RD VAIL Location: Legal Description: Lot: D Block: Subdivision: WOODRIDGE TOWNHOUSES Parcel Number: 2101-124-1700-6 Comments: SUBMITTED APPLICATION IS INCOMPLETE BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Action: VOID Second By: Vote: Date of Approval: Conditions: Planner: Bill Gibson DRB Fee Paid: $20.00 - -� � fi��r�-» ��L H��?�+ -- � �r�33,�,✓ � T10WNOF VAI� ' Department of Community Development `� 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 � 970-479-2138 �� FAX 970-479-2452 �� www vaclgoucom �� May 12, 2005 ���,� Ms. Jennifer Shay 4545 Bighorn Road � Vail, CO 81657 Re: Development potential of Lots 3, 4, and 5 (Parcels A—E) Block 1, Bighorn Subdivision 3rd Addition Dear Ms. Shay, Thank you for meeting with me several weeks a�go to discuss the development potential of Lots 3, 4, and 5 (Parcels A— E), Block 1, Bighorn Subdivision 3` addition. You may remember that in 1979, the lot lines of 3 the subdivision were vacated due to"a difficult access situation on the property'(see attached 11/14/78 I Planning and Environmental Commission minutes). As a result, the development potential of each existing dwelling unit is dependent on the development potential which remains for the entire lot(or Parcels A—E). Though duplex plats of Parcels A and B occurred in 1988 and 1986 respectively(a process that is generally pursued simply for the purpose of designating party walls within a duplex), the distribution of remaining develo�ment potential among all parcels remains effective. Any plan for your residence which affects Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA), site coverage, landscaped area, or other common development standards, as outlined below, must bear the signature of each homeowner within the Woodridge Townhomes in the absence of an official Homeowners Association. Zoninq Analysis (according to plats on file at the Town of Vail as of 05.13.05) Legal Description: Lots 3, 4, and 5{Parcels A— E), Lot 1, Bighorn Subdivision 3`d Addition Physical Address: 4545—4595 Bighorn Road, Vail CO 81657 Zoning: Residential Cluster Lot Size: 58,278 square feet/1.3379 acres (Parcels A— E) Hazards: None Standard AllowedlRequired Setbacks: (from perimeter of entire site area including Parcels A — E, since individual lot lines no longer exist) Front: 20 ft. Sides: 15 ft. Rear: 15 ft. Height: 33' for sloping roof forms, 30' for flat roof forms GRFA: 36 sq. ft. allowed for each 100 square feet of buildable site area (20,980 sq. ft. for total land area of Parcels A— E} Site Coverage: 25% of total site area I (14,569 sq. ft. for total site area of Parcels A— E) ��RE�YCLED PAPER . � Density: 6 dwelling units per acre Landscape Area: 60% of each site area (34,966 sq. ft. for total site area of Parcels A— E) Please note that the Town of Vail has no formal record of the amount of Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) or site coverage (the footprint that each building occupies)which exists upon all five parcels. Such information will need to be submitted to the Town in conjunction with any application affecting GRFA or site coverage. Please free to call me should unanswered questions still exist and I will be more than happy to help you resolve those issues. I wish you the best as you continue to exp{ore the various options that may exist for improvement to your lot and resid e. Best Regards,/ �� �' +,,/ � _ � ��� � , �, � � _ ��'���� �� E1i�"at�th Eckel 970.479.2454 ` � Pg. 4 - Minutes - PEC 11/141�8 would not be out durinq the heavy traffic hours . He answered Pam Garton 's question on the nurnber of employees , stating there will be two employees. Jim Rubin advised the Commission that Mr. Pintkowski has checked with the Environmental Health Officer and the Bu-ilding Official and they have ok'd his plans. Pam Garton made the Motion to approve Louis Pintkowski 's request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of an orange .iuice business in Crossroads that uiill make deliveries subject to the memorandum prepared by the Department of Community Development dated 9 November 1978. • Gerry White seconded the Motion and the Commission voted unanimous approval . The Commission then �vent to item six on the agenda , John Wheeler - Reqaest for vacation of Lot Lines between Lots 3 an� 4, Lots 4 and 5, Lots 6 and 7 , Elack 1., B�ahorn SuF�division 3rd Addition , Ar��ended Pl�t. � John 4�l�ieel er expl a�nec� hi s reaues� for vacati on of 1 vt 1 i�nes beca��se of a difficult access situation to the pro�rerty. The Commission was shown the site plan �lc7ineating the natural split of the proaerty. After f�irtl�er discussion , a Moticn was made by Ron Tadd to approve the vacation of Lot Lines betG�reen Lots 3 and 4, Lots 4 and 5, Lots 6 and 7, Block 1 , Bighorn { Subdlvision 3rd Addition, An�ended Plat subject to t�e mem�randum pre�ared by the Depar�ment of Communi�y Develop�nent dat�el 9 Navember 1978. Sancfy Mi11s seconded the h�otion and the Co�T�cjiission voted unanimous approval . The fifth item on the a4enda, Jay Peterson - Request for Parking Variance for expansion of the coffee shop in the 6dedel Inn. Jay Peter�son, Attorney at Law represents Mary Haygood in her reauest for a Parkir�q Variance for the expansion of the New Orleans Coffee Shop in the Wedel Inn. He stressed the fact tha�: the coffee shon is in a Public Accommodation Dis�:rict, iust steps awa.y f rom CC1 where the Town has felt that pedestrianization of the area is important ar,d that there should be less vehicular traffic. Ne stated there is no conversion problem here as the space has been used as storage space 7 months out of the year. Al�though � at one time these were accommodation units, they are no longer desirable lodge rooms because of their location. After further discussion, Pam Garton made the Motion to approve the Parking Variance for the New Orleans Coffee Shop expansion i� tf�e Wedel Inn according to the memorandum prepared b_y the Department of Community Development dated 9 November 1978 and with the stipulation that this variance be treated , similarly to those given in CC1 with a fee to be paid b.v the applicant into the Parking Fund . Ron Todd seconded the Motion and the Commission voted unanimous approval . Jim Rubin asked that a work session be set to review the Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance on Tuesday, November 28, 1978 at 8 a.m. � � �. The meeting adjourned at 5 :10 P.M. c � 1 � � � ,; Pg. 3 - Minutes - PEC 11/14/78 Mr. White stated that he feels there should be a break in the large developRients and high densit_y development, that low density is really required here . Mr. Elmore does not agree. Ron Todd felt that 9 units per acre is reasonable, that youu couldn 't really build luxury units right on the Frontage Road and that with the bonus for lonq-term rentals this Ulould give him 13 units per acre. He supports the 9 units plus bonus for employee housing. He made the Motion to approve the recommended zoning for Parcel "A" at 9 units/LDMF with a 50% bonus for employee housinq (long-term housing) . Ed Drager s�conded the Motion. The Commission voted 1 (Ron Todd) for approval , 4 opposed, the Motion was defea�ed. Gerry White made the Motion to recornmend Parcel "A" be zofied Residential Cluster with 6 units per acre allowable, plus 3 units per acre (50% bonus for long-term housing) . Pam Garton secanded the Motion and the Commission voted unanimous approval . Ron Todd made the Motion to recommend that Parcel "B'' be zoned Residential Primary/Secondary. Sandy Mills seconded the Motion and the Commission voted unanimous approval . , Ron Todd made the Plotion to recommend that Parcel "C" be zoned Residential Clus�er with 50% bonus for employee (long-term) housing. Ed Drager seconded the Motion . 1 vote (Ron Todd) for approval , 4 opposed, the Motion was defeated. Gerry ulhite made the Motion to recommend that Parcel "C" be zoned GreenbeltJOpen Space. Sandy Mills seconded �he Motion. Mr. Elmore interjected that there is already a duplex on Parcel "C". It was explained that this �vould remain as a non-conformina structure but if it was destroyed or removed, it could not be rebuilt under this zoning. The Ccmmission voted 4 in favor, Ron Todd voted in opposition. The Motion passed. It was brought out that the Town Council will hear this at their next meetina. Pam Garton made a Motion to amend the zoning recommendation on Parcel "A" making it an RC designation with an uoper limit that �vould qive Mr. Elrnore the additior�al units denied an Pa►�cel� "C" which would be 3 reqular units plus i:he bonus for ernployee (long-term) housing. The Motion was seconded by Ron Todd. The Commission voted uanimous approval for this addendum to the Motion on Parcel "A". The 4th item on the agenda, Pini;kowski - Request fcr Conc�itional Use Permit to allo�� the oDeration of an o►°ange juice business in Crossroads that w-ill make deliveries . t�ir. Louis Pintkowski addressed the Commission. . He exnlained his reauest far the Cor�ditional Use Permit and stated that his location is on the 4th floor of Crossroads, a very poor location for a retail store. Ne G�aishes to occupy a eombination of office and storage space. He stated tl�at his delivery vehicle would be on the streets from 3 a.m. to � a.m. , so tr�ey PEC minutes-6-26-79-Page Two - - _•�-�—°-6-- �------�--s Jim Morgan said he feels Mr. Gorsuch should prove the hardship involved. Jim Rubin explained that he requested the variance on behalf of Mr. Gorsuch ,� and that the Town Attorney advised him it could be done on a short notice. Mr. Gorsuch said that staff advised him that the variance had been requested for approval and he did not learn of the denial recommendation until ten minutes before the meeting . Roger Tilkemeier made a motion to approve the variance for a six foot wall on the Dave Gorsuch property on Lot 4; Block 2, Vail Valley lst Filing with the stipulation that this does not set a precedent but is merely to accommodate a series of errors by the staff. � . Ron Todd seconded the motion. The vote was five for approval and J�m Morgan abstained. 2. ) Gore Creek Park-Subdivision and Rezoning of Parcel A Bighorn Subdivision and Parcel A Bighorn First Addition. Jim Rubin explained that this is a down zoning f rom 26 units to 14 units . He said there were access problems but that the access problems as well as the water and sewer problems were taken care of already. >. Jay Peterson, representing the developers, expla�ined the project to the Board and answered their questions regarding the sewer, high water levels, etc.� He said that one piece of the development will be dedicated to the Town. A 60 foot section af that piece will be held back temporarily to � see if it is needed by the gas company. Gerry White made a motion for approval of the rezoning of Parcel A ° � . Bighorn Subdivision and Parcel A Bighorn First. Jack Goehl seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous for approval . Gerry White made a motion for approval of the resubdivision of Parcel A Bighorn Subdivision and Parcel A Bighorn lst subject to the comment� of Jay Peterson regarding the retention of the 60 foot piece of land temporarily in case it is needed by the gas company. Jack Goehl seconded the motion . 'fhe vote was unanimous. 3. ) �Ioodridge Townhouses-Pla� Approv�l Ji�n Rubin ar�d Duane Piper explained this praject. It was brought to the Planr�ir�g and Environmenta7 C4�+r�i�sinn for the �lir�xination of � lat lines and was ap�r�aved. "fhis was dpn� so th�ey cauTd place th� buildar�c�s �n the apen spaces and not cut dfl��n trees. �he plans w�r�e �hero approved by the �es�gn Review Board. Jim Rubin explain�d that this 15 a�ain cvming to Planr�7ng and Enviranmer�t�1 Comnaission for approval of the plat. There was a short discussion. Ed Drager asked what control there is to insure the buildings will be constructed as planned. Jim Rubin said they will have to do as they presented to the Design Review Board. . --'�'"� .. ,�_ —�� PEC minutes-6-26-79-Page Three . � Ed Drager said he feels in the future more stringent criteria should be set to have control>s other than Design Reveiw Board. Ron Todd made a motion ta approv� the Woodridge Townhouse Plat as presented at this meeting. Gerry White seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous. Items four through seven were discussion (non-voting) items, and, therefore, no minutes were taken. � � R 1 - 01.28.05 �+ = • � loning Analysis: " Lots 3,4,Fi5, Black I, Bighorn Subdivision _ �� 4545 - 4595 Bighorn Rd., Yail, Colorado Lot Size: 1.34 acre / 58,310 sq. h. Bued on Eagle founty Records, actual area subject to verification by professional suney Parcel A = 10,151.48sf / 0.2468ac ; West Side = 4,221.55si East Side = 6,519.11sf Parcel B = 9,042.99si / O.Z016ac - Parcel C = 12,517.10sf/ 0.3881ac = Parcel D = I1,342.56sf/ 0.2604ac ; Parcel E = 14,568.48sf/ 0.3344ac Zoning Residential Cluster - Setbacks: 20' front, 15' Sides, 15' Rear " Height 33' Sloped Roofs, 30' F1at Roois � Landscaping: 35,022 sq. ft. required (60% of total site area) _ Parking <2,OOsf = 2, >2,ODOsf<4,OOOsi = 3, >4,000<5,500 = 4 spaces . GRFA (Gross Residential Floor Area): Allowable: for All Dwelling Units 21,�13sf total allowable GRFA for 58,310sf Lot = GRfA: Existing: ° 4545 Bighorn Rd. , Conditioned lower living areas = 568sf � Upper liring areas = 1280sf ' Loh F� cathedral ceiling areas with height greater than 16' = 3Z1.5sf .-., 4��� Garage = 300sf (does not count toward GRFA) Crawlspace = 349sf �does not count toward GRFA) • -`' Total GRFA for Unit = 2.169.5sf �, 4595 Bighorn Units 5-1 � Woodridge Triplex: Units 6 and 1 [onditioned lower living areas = 568sf Upper fiving areas = 1280sf + 93.5sf Greenhouse = 1,313.5sf Loft & cathedral ceiling areas with height greater than 16' = 321.5sf '° Garage = 300sf (doe coun GRFA) Crawtspace = 349si dQ -nat-c�un wa GRFA ' Total GRFA for Units 6 and — 263sf x = 4 526sf � ; .,"�.. . . www.khwqbb.rom . � Unit 5 '� (onditioned lower living areas = 598.5sf ; Upper living areu = 1206sf + 93.5sf Greenhouse = 1321sf ; loft & cathedral ceiling areas with height�$reater than 16' = 383sf Garage = 300sf (does not count toward GRFA) ` Crawispace = 272sf (does not count toward GRFA) • Total GRFA for Unit 5 = 2,280.5sf ' 4595 Bighorn Units 3 & 4 - Woodridge Duplex #2: Unit 3 ` �onditioned lower living areas = 568sf Upper living areas = 1280sf + 121sf Greenhouse = 1,401sf ; Loft & cathedral ceiling areas with height greater than 16' = 321.5sf Garage = 300sf (does not count toward GRFA) i Crawispace = 349sf (does not count toward GRFA) Total GRFA for Units 6 and 1 = �,290.5sf � Unit 4 ' Conditioned lower living areas = 598.5sf x . Upper living areu = 1206sf � Loft & cathedral ceiling areas with height greater than 16' = 383sf Garage = 300sf (does not count toward GRFA) T frawlspace = 212sf (does not count toward GRFA) ' Total GRFA for Unit 5 = 2.181.5sf ; 4595 Bighorn Units I & 2 " Woodridge Duplex #I: � Duplex Unit �: � lower level living areu: 6i05f ° Upper living areas: i392.5sf : Garage & mechanical more than 25% open to garage = 600sf (does not count toward GRFA) � Toral GRFA for duplex Unit 2 = 2,062.5sf `�" Duplex Unit I: lower level living areu: 610sf ,�� Upper living areas: 1312sf Garage & mechanical more than 25% open to garage = 600sf(does not count toward GRFA) a,; Total GRFA for duplex Unit I = 1,982sf GRFA Tatals for the site: Woodridge Dup{ex #I = 4,044.5sf ' Woodridge Dup(ex # 2 = 4,418sf Woodridge Triplex = 6,806.5sf = Woodridge single family home = 2,169.5sf Total GRFA = 11.498.5sf 3�514.Ssf Available GRFA for the site' - : : www.kbwebb.rom � a �� ' � � � 'Alternate possibility depending upon professional survey: Assume 20% of lower levels o� the r •: site are below grade. (610+610+598.5+568+598.5+568+568+568) x0.20 = 961.8si basement deduction. Therefore there would be 4.476s( o(available GRFA for the site. . . � ' Opportunities for expansion: Additioac ubliring available GRfA lnteriar Conversion - Basement Deduction _ ISD.rq. k additional upgrade tv unitr more than S yearr ald Items not included in above numbers: � JDD.rq. k oedit pe�enclnred garage rQace up to 1wo - Alticr leu than S'in height, Atticc nnty aaeuible hnm the Onor be%w Yaulted spacef nnw caunt against lquare lootage abnve /6'in height. Baremen�r who//y be%w grade, il portion.c above grade, they wi//caunt � Site (overage: 14,592.5sf (25% o( site max.) New Ioning Revisions: The To►vn of Vail has recently revised GRFA (Eloor Area) Regulations. 'fhe synopais is that _ the Town will onl�r count a percentage of below grade and substantially sub-grade spaces in its Square Footage limits provided square footage is oot used up above the basement or lowest level. Yaulted spaces now count as square Ifootage above 16' in height Site foverage Limits have not changed. = Please note that the a�ove numbers are subject to verification by the Town of Vail Planning Staff and will vary subject to the individual client's design and decision making proceu. r e R 8 � a ■ � a s ��� �1 i::) �G �� � www.kbNebb.rom