Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutB12-002310 -15 -2014 Inspection Request Reporting Page 1 4:39 pm __Vail, CO - City Of Requested Inspect Date: Thursday, October 16 2014 Site Address: 232 W MEADOW DR 1%AIL 232 WEST MEADOW DRIVE A /P /D Information Activity: B12 -0023 Type: COMBO Sub Type: NDUP Status: ISSUED Const Type: Occupancy: Use: R -3 Insp Area: Owner: LAPIN, MERVYN Architec ND ARCHITECTS Phone: 970 - 926 -4301 Contractor: VAIL CUSTOM BUILDERS Phone: 970 - 331 -6130 Description: new duplex home. existing house, detached 2nd unit and existing nonconforming deck to be demolished Requested Inspection(s) Item: 540 BLDG -Final C/O Requestor: Comments: 331 -6130 Assigned To: JMONDRAGON Action: -7 Exp: �P Time: 03:30 PM 'hone: red By: MHAEBERLE K Inspection History Item: 532 PW -TEMP. C/O ** Approved ** 11/11/13 Inspector: Is Action: P ARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: Approval for Apartment Unit only. 01/27/14 Inspector: Is Action: APPROVED Comment: Primary Residence Item: 543 PW FINAL Item: 503 PW -Final Driveway Grade 01/27/14 Comment: Inspector: Is Action: DN DENIED Will ned to install a concrete border to seperate heated brick of driveway to heated pavers non pavers on West Meadow Drive. Both Driveways work to be completed in spring 2014 or before a Final CO is granted Item: 10 BLDG - FOOTING **Approved** 05/24/12 Comment: Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION structual slab will require SI report for concrete PSI testing 06/04/12 Comment: Inspector: Martin Action: AP APPROVED Column footing and walls 2 thru 4 at K 07/20/12 Comment: Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED Plus the ufer ground 08/08/12 Comment: Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED 07/11/13 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED Comment: site wall Item: 20 BLDG - Foundation /Steel ** Approved ** 06/04/12 Comment: Inspector: Martin Action: AP APPROVED Foundation walls K to 11 at EE to CC Except 10 to 11 thru E 06/04/12 Comment: Inspector: Martin Action: CR CORRECTION REQUIRED Walls cantileversd over footing at 10 thru 11 A thru E. Engineer to provide revised drawings before approval 06/05/12 Comment: Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION re- msperction ok per engineer letter see notice for details 08/08/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED Comment: 07/17/13 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED Comment: site wall Item: 21 PLAN -ILC Foundation Plan ** Approved ** 09/20/12 Inspector: bgibson Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 110 ELEC - Service ** Approved ** 10/30/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION REPT131 Run Id: 14741 KRMCONSULTANTS, INC. ` 1 P.O. Box 4572 970- 949 -9391 VAIL, COLORADO 81 658 FAX 949 -1577 FIELD REPORT TO: DATE. 7/20/2012 Vail Custom Builders ARRIVE. • 8:30 am 0429 Edwards Access Road DEPART. 10:30 am Edwards, CO 81632 WEATHER: Sunny I ATTENTION: Benno Scheidegger JOB NUMBER: 1106-01 PROJECT.- Lapin Residence PRESENTAT SITE: Ryan Schmidt, Benno Scheidegger STATUS OF COMPLETION. • Footings formed as indicated below Phase II Footing Reinforcement Observation Observation of rebar placement in footings was performed on 7/20/2012 prior to concrete pour as requested by Vail Custom Builders. The site visit included the observation of reinforcement for the footings located between grid lines 6 through 17 and E through P, and along grid lines AA, CC, EE, 2A, 4A and 5A, see Lapin Residence sheet S2. Rebar type, size, and placement, and footing sizes were observed to be consistent with the Foundation Plan and details indicated on structural plan S2. Floor framing was observed between grid lines 1 and 11 and between L and A extending to 6A such that contractor may proceed with backfill along grid lines 6A and 11 as needed. Please contact KRM Consultants with any questions. SIGNED: t COPY TO: Hans Berglund ya . Schmidt REVIEWED: da RE GIs Tim D. Hennum, PE S 341 V FFSS10 G( tech HEPWORTH- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL July 19, 2012 Vail Custom Builders Flelnn rth PaN'Iak GC.rrcChttici ' In,- 5020 G ionty Road I i4 l delw,xd Sprin,,,s, l.Ol, -mdo 81601 Phone: 970-045.70118 Fa.x: 970- 945 -,)-154 email: h1��eo,s:I7p_c•�a�Chxam Attn: Benno Scheidegger P.O. Box 2809 Edwards, Colorado 81632 ( benno u vailcustom com) Job No. 111 113B Subject: Observation of Partial Excavation, Proposed Lapin Residence, 232 West Meadow Drive, Lot 7, Vail Village 2nd Filing, Vail, Colorado Gentlemen: As requested, a representative of Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the garage area excavation at the subject site on July 16, 2012 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated June 29, 2011, Job No. 111 113A. The proposed residence is similar to that described in our previous report. Spread footings placed on the natural granular soils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 were used for the building support. A subdrain system designed by Alpine Engineering is being installed in basement and crawlspace areas to prevent water level rise below the building. At the time of our July 16'h site visit, the foundation excavation for the garage area located to the north of the basement had been cut in three levels between 3 to 6 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted mainly of natural, silty sand and gravel with cobbles. In the area next to the basement at the west side was foundation wall backfill. The east side of the garage area foundation had not been excavated and will also be above foundation wall backfill. We understand that the foundation has been designed to span the foundation wall backfill. No free water was encountered and the soils were moist. The natural granular soils exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on the site and can be used for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 • . -4 . Vail Custom Builders July 19, 2012 Page 2 The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation movement and groundwater seepage impacts. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Paw lak, P. E 16222 SLP/ksw ' J'1••. �HAL cc: Berglund Architects Alpine Engineering — Attn: Gler Job No. 11 1113B 1h Winkler (keegan@berglundarchitects.com) Palmer (pahneri- Zalpinecivil.com) Ge9tech Hl Irp0 (( R11)(V�•i, l C c aechnical, Iii.. Road 154 Go GlemvN,d Spring,,, Colora�� 8161'1 Phone: 07o-945-7988 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL fay: ')70-045-S414 email -:roach eom July 18, 2012 Vail Custom Builders Attn: Benno Scheidegger P.O. Box 2809 Edwards, Colorado 81632 (bennona,vailcustom com) Job No. 111 113B Subject: Observation of Partial Excavation, Proposed Lapin Residence, 232 West Meadow Drive, Lot 7, Vail Village 2nd Filing, Vail, Colorado Gentlemen: As requested, a representative of Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the completed crawlspace area excavation at the subject site on July 16, 2012 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated June 29, 2011, Job No. 111 I I3A. The proposed residence is similar to that described in our previous report. Spread footings placed on the natural granular soils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 were used for the building support. A subdrain system designed by Alpine Engineering is being installed to prevent water level rise below the building. A site visit was made on July 5, 2012 to observe the excavation and subdrain installation progress. At the time of our July 160' site visit, the foundation excavation for the crawlspace area located to the south and east of the basement had been cut in two levels up to 6 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation were variable and consisted of natural, silty sand and gravel with cobbles in the deeper, northern cut areas and soft wet soils in shallow, southeastern cut areas. The soft areas had been excavated down about 2 feet to the coarse granular soils and replaced with cobble size rock covered with filter fabric and screened rock. The subdrain system had been installed in general accordance with the Alpine Engineering plan. In the sub - excavated soft areas, the subdrain could not be installed down below the excavation for dewatering because of subdrain grade limitations. The groundwater seepage had been controlled by the subdrain in the excavation and the crushed rock placed above the cobble rock. The natural granular soils exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on the site and together with about 2 feet of cobble soil and crushed rock can Parker 303 - 541 -7119 • Colorado Springs 719- 633 -5562 • Silverthorne 970 -468 -1959 `r Vail Custom Builders July 18, 2012 Page 2 be used for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation, removal of unsuitable soft soils and the previous subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation movement and groundwater seepage impacts. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P. 15222 Jgan SLP/ksw cc: Berglund Architects inkler ( keegan(aberQlundarchitects.com) Alpine Engineering — Attn: Glenn Palmer (palmer Eialpinecivil.com) Job No. 111 113B G99tech TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprinted on 07 -30 -2012 at 13:41:08 07/30/2012 Statement ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Statement Number: R120001003 Amount: $330.00 07/30/201201:40 PM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: DR Notation: VISA MERV LAPIN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B12 -0023 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Parcel No: 2101 - 071 - 0100 -4 Site Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Location: 232 WEST MEADOW DRIVE Total Fees: 105,388.79 This Payment: $330.00 Total ALL Pmts: 105,388.79 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------- - - - - -- ------------------------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 330.00 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES 6 TOWN OF VAIL Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Permit #: 1312 -0023 Project #: PRJ11 -0071 Job Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Applied.....: 02/14/2012 Location......: 232 WEST MEADOW DRIVE Issued...: 03/08/2012 Parcel No....: 210107101004 OWNER LAPIN, MERVYN 02/14/2012 232 W MEADOW DR VAI L CO 81657 ARCHITECT BERGLUND ARCHITECTS PO BOX 2378 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: C000002069 02/14/2012 Phone: 970-926-4301 APPLICANT LAPIN, MERVYN 02/14/2012 232 W MEADOW DR VAI L CO 81657 CONTRACTOR VAIL CUSTOM BUILDERS PO BOX 2809 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: C000003221 02/14/2012 Phone: 970-904-0512 Description: new duplex home. existing house, detached 2nd unit and existing nonconforming deck to be demolished Occupancy: R -3 Type Construction: VB Valuation: $3,400,000.00 ................................ ..............................> ,..,, <_...,..,.,. FEE SUMMARY ...............................,.......,,..._.._ ..,,........,.._..........,.__. Building Permit ------ - - - - -> $14,368.75 Bldg Plan Check ----- - - - - -> $9,339.69 Use Tax Fee------------------ - - - - -> $67,800.00 Electrical Permit ---- - - - - -> $1,288.00 Elec Plan Check ------ - - - - -> $837.20 Restuarant Plan Review--- - - - - -> $0.00 Mechanical Permit - - - - - -> $5,620.00 Mech Plan Check ---- - - - - -> $1,405.00 Additional Fees--------------- - - - - -> $0.00 Plumbing Permit --- - - - - -> $2,310.00 Plmb Plan Check ---- - - - - -> $577.50 Recreation Fee--------------- - - - - -> $1,492.65 Investigation------------------ - - - - -> $0.00 Will Call ------------------------------ > $20.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES--------- - - - - -> 105,388.79 Payments ------------------------------- > 105,388.79 BALANCE DUE ------------------------ > $0.00 DECLARATIONS I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY -FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM. combination permit_012811 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF Permit #: B12 -0023 Owner: LAPIN, MERVYN MEADOW DRIVE Cond: CON0012438 The applicant shall provide the Town of Vail construction access to the adjacent Gore Creek stream tract. The purpose of this access is to facilitate the removal of the existing bridge, removal of the existing timber wall abutments, re- grading and re- vegetation of the stream tract, the installation of stream bank stabilization, and other associated construction activities. Cond: CON0012439 A Revocable Right of Way Permit will be required prior to Project recieving a TCO or Final CO. Required work in Gore Creek for removal of Bridge and cribbing is on going. PW, Chad Salli is working on design and permitting. PW has contact General Contractor on cost estimates to do the work on behalf of the TOV. Cond: CON0012445 Radon system inspections required combination permit_012811 Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Location: 232 WEST TOWN 0 PAIL Permit #: B12 -0023 Owner: LAPIN, MERVYN MEADOW DRIVE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Location: 232 WEST Item: 00010 BLDG - FOOTING 05/24/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: structual slab will require SI report for concrete PSI testing 06/04/2012 By: Martin Action: AP Comments: Column footing and walls 2 thru 4 at K 07/20/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments: Plus the ufer ground Item: 00020 BLDG - Foundation /Steel 06/04/2012 By: Martin Action: AP Comments: Foundation walls K to 11 at EE to CC Except 10 to 11 thru E 06/04/2012 By: Martin Action: CR Comments: Walls cantileversd over footing at 10 thru 11 A thru E. Engineer to provide revised drawings before approval 06/05/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: re- insperction ok per engineer letter see notice for details Item: 00021 PLAN -ILC Foundation Plan Item: 00110 ELEC - Service Item: 00120 ELEC -Rough Item: 00200 MECH -Rough Item: 00210 PLMB- Underground 05/03/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments: tested at 5 psi Item: 00220 PLMB- Rough /D.W.V. Item: 00230 PLMB- Rough/Water Item: 00240 PLMB -Gas Piping Item: 00250 PLMB -Pool /Hot Tub Item: 00260 PLMB -Misc. Item: 00310 MECH- Heating 05/23/2012 By: mdenney Action: PI Comments: in -floor tubing in slab. pressure tested. Item: 00315 PLMB -Gas Piping Item: 00320 MECH- Exhaust Hoods Item: 00330 MECH - Supply Air Item: 00340 MECH -Misc. Item: 00410 Special Inspect - progress rept 05/24/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Soils report scanned Item: 00022 PLAN -ILC FRAMING Item: 00030 BLDG - Framing Item: 00050 BLDG - Insulation Item: 00060 BLDG - Sheetrock Nail Item: 00070 BLDG -Misc. Item: 00190 ELEC -Final combination permit_012811 Item: 00290 PLMB -Final Item: 00390 MECH -Final Item: 00420 Special Inspect -final rept Item: 00533 PLAN -TEMP. C/O Item. 00530 BLDG -Temp. C/O Item. 00540 BLDG -Final C/O Item. 00542 PLAN -FINAL Item: 00090 BLDG -Final combination permit_012811 Department of Community Development K 75 South Frontage Road TOWN OF VA Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970 - 479 -2128 www.vailgov.com 4' development Review Coordinator TRANSMITTAL FORM Revision Submittals: 1. "Field Set" of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved & the permit is re- issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are $55.00 per hour (2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. Permit #(s) information applies to: Attention: Revisions X() Response to Correction Letter , Ltti _attached copy of correction letter ( ) Deferred Submittal ( ) Other Project Street Address: W )MQ_a vK) (Number) (Street) (Suite #) Building /Complex Name: Ro 5 Contractor Information �V Business Name: (,i Business Address: (04ZA S-- L keAK kc CASs City ZOLk�+pS State: O zip: Contact Name: _Xe tAO C Contact Phone: t70 33 Contact E -Mail: 2-e h V� Q., V aJ C 0� -'� I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordin es of the Tow applicable thereto. Owrfer /Owner's Representative Signature (Require Applicant Information Description / List of Changes: I CLkml„c,e= +-tl lu'I roves �'� IC AZO (use additional sheet if necessary) Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building: $ Plumbing: $ Electrical: $ Mechanical: $ Total: $ Applicant Name: 1 Date Received: Applicant Phone: Applicant E -Mail: Eo� For Office Use Only: JUL 10 2012 Fee Paid: Received From: /0!2 D}� Cash Check # TOWN OF VAIL CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # exp. date: Auth # TOWN OF VAIL/ Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970 -479 -2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator TRANSMITTAL FORM Revision Submittals: 1. "Field Set" of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved & the permit is re- issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are $55.00 per hour (2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. Permit #(s) information applies to: 611- 0023 Project Street Address: nl_ �W es-r h gfo vw Deiv& Attention: (Number) (Street) pp (Suite #) Building /Complex Name: 41,1 J (DES 1 pc—N Contractor Information /t Business Name: VA I L (_, li` v is �> W l-be� Business Address: PO BOAC � oq p city E a W14R ^^� nS State: W zip: 0 3� Contact Name: [3cwuo Sf.E}t✓ 1 br-"Gp, Contact Phone: q J 0• 3 3 1• 6130 Contact E -Mail: 6e]&�, D WI. GD I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved, lilemational Building and Residential Codes and other ordiX s of th Town applicab to. X Hl - - Owner /Owner's Representative Signature (Required) Applicant Information Applicant Name: &IV -A/0 S&4 -v p Applicant Phone: [7lJ — 33 % — 6, 1 _�(% ,Applicant E -Mail: AV VA4j Golc For Office Use Only: Fee Paid: Received From: Cash Check # _ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # exp. date: K. Revisions ( ) Response to Correction Letter _attached copy of correction letter ( ) Deferred Submittal ( ) Other Description / List of Changes: . 7fY Q �dVlS2.dC, (use additional sheet if necessary) Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building: $ Plumbing: $ Electrical: Mechanical: $ Total: $ Date Received: T �on �D j� MAY 23 TOWN OF VA IL `� BERGLUND Architects, LLC DATE May 9, 2012 TO Town of Vail Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 970.479.2128 970.479.2452 Fax C.C. C.C. FROM Hans Berglund T R A N S M I T T A L pFE 'LL FE adFE MAY 2 3 ZU1Z TOWN OF VAIL RE Lapin Residence 232 West Meadow Drive, Vail, CO 81657 VIA Hand Delivery ENCLOSED (3) stamped architectural sets of drawings Revision 3 dated 4 -20 -12 and Revision 4 date 5 -1 -12 drawings included: - A2.0 siteplan dated 4 -20 -12 for sewer lift staion change - A2.4 Utility plan dated 4 -20 -12 for sewer lift staion change - A3.0 lower level plan showing the sewer lift station removed from the mechanical room. - A3.1 Main Level plan dated 5 -1 -12 shows flooring changes in the master wing and framing changes at living room fireplace northeast wall. - A3.2 Upper Level plan dated 5 -1 -12 show framing change @ stair landing art niche - A7.1 Fireplace sheet dated 5 -1 -12 shows chimney northeast wall changed from 2x8 to 2x10 wall ripped down to 8" for boiler flu pipe clearances. - A8.1 Detail sheet dated 5 -1 -12 - detail 10/8.1 shows lift and slide door header change from 6x6 tube steel to 6x4 tube steel with 2" solid wood on underside to attach door header. (3) stamped mechanical drawings M1.0, M2.0 and M2.1 dated 4 -20 -12 with sewer lift station change (3) complete stamped structural drawings dated 5 -1 -12 with framing changes (1) set of utility verification from all utility companies referencing 4 -20 -12 drawings. COMMENTS All drawings dated 4 -20 -12 show the proposed sewer lift station moved from the mechanical room to the exterior of the building towards the southeast corner inside the utility easement. We have verified with all utility companies there are no concerns with the proposed placement of the sewer lift station. All drawing dated 5 -1 -12 show minor framing and finish changes found during framing coordination meeting. P.O. Box 2378, Edwards, CO 81632 Tel: 970 926 -4301 fax: 970 926 -4364 BERGLUND ARCHITECTS, LLC Date: 5- 10 -12, page 1 of 1 Drawing sheet/ Document DESCRIPTION Supplemental information for Lapin Residence Architectural Revision 3 dated 4 -20 -12 and Revision 4 dated 5 -1 -12 Direct any questions to Hans Berglund or Keegan Winkeller Lapin Residence Revision 3 and Revision z Sheet A2.0 Siteplan Revision 3 Dated 4 -20 -12 - New sewer lift station location on south side of the residence inside the utility easement Sheet A2.4 Utility Plan Revision 3 Dated 4 -20 -12 - New sewer lift station location on south side of the residence inside the utility easement Sheet A3.0 Lower Level Floorplan Revision 3 Dated 4 -20 -12 - sewer lift station and future sump pump removed from lower level mechanical roo Sheet A3.1 Main Level Plan Revision 4 Dated 5 -1 -12 - shows flooring changes in the master wing and framing changes at living room fireplace northeast wall. Sheet A3.2 Upper Level Floorplan Revision 4 dated 5 -1 -12 - shows framing change @ stair landing art niche. Framing inside art niche is now 2x framing to allow structural HSS 3x3x3/16 column. Fur out 2x6 framing 1 1/2" on east side of wall to increase depth of art niche. Sheet A7.1 Fireplace Sheet Revision 4 Dated 5 -1 -12 - shows northeast chimney wall increased from 2x8 framing to 2x10 framing ripped to 8" to allow for necessary clearances for mech. boiler flu pipes. Furr out around flu pipes inside fireplace chase and wrap with 5/8" type X Gyp Sheathing to separate from fireplace chase. Sheet A8.1 Architectural Detail Sheet Revision 4 Dated 5 -1 -12 - Detail 10/A8.1 Structural tube steel header changed from 6x6 to 6x4 to allow soli wood blocking below for Weiland door connection. Re structural sheet S4 Structural Drawings Typical Changes Structural Revision Dated 5 -1 -12 - all structural floor plans have been updated to show correct gridlines to match architectural drawin Sheet S2 Foundation Structural Revision Dated 5 -1 -12 - Steel Column at gridlines 8.6 and D move to north side of grid line D to align with hallway wall. Sheet S3 Main Level Floor Framing Revision Dated 5 -1 -12 - Removed steel beam at grid line 8 and resized beam @ grid line 8.2. Resized ste beam on grid line F and added a transfer beam at gridline 8.6. Removed steel column over beam pocket at stair angled wall. Sheet S4 Upper Level Floor Framing Revision Dated 5 -1 -12 - Resized column at griline K and 8.2 and added detail 7 /S10 to show cantilever steel beam connection. Revised beam connection details at gridline G between gridlines 14 and 15. Added door header @ merv's office entry door and added detail 8/S10 to show steel beam connection to wood door header. Resized living room weiland door headers. Sheet S5 Roof Framing Plan Revision dated 5 -1 -12 - added door header for stoage closet on gridline 3A Sheet S10 Structural Detail Sheet revision dated 5 -1 -12 - added detail 7 and 8 Sheet M1.0 Mechanical schedules sheet - Changed lift station spec to TBD Sheet M2.0 Lower Level Mechanical Plan revision dated 4 -20 -12 - Removed lift station from Lower Level mechanical room Sheet A2.1 Main Level Mechanical Plan revision dated 4 -20 -12 - Revised waste line location. TBD by contractor 3 4 UTILITY APPROVAL & VERIFICATION This form serves to verity that the proposed improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and schedul- ing installations A site plan. including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitted to the following utilities for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that timeframe please contact The Town of Vail. Subject Property Address: 232 West Meadow Drive Primary "Contact / Owner Representative: Berglund Architects "JVNA U,IL 'r_'V_ -E W_ �Aw � I U_ 7- Plans Dated: Primary Contact/Owner Representative Signature ,--- Lot Block Subdivision: VVFil.2 Phone: (970) 926 -4301 (Rev 4) 4 -20 -12 NOTES: Utility locations must be obtained before digging. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right -of -way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.479.2198. It is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies for re- approval & re- verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. Authorized Signature Comments Date CENTURYLINK 970.468.6860(tel) 970.468.0672(fax) Contacts: Samuel Tooley samuel.toole centu link.com XCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS 970.262.4076 (tel) 970.468.1401 (fax) Contact: Rich Sisneros richard.sisneros xcelener .com HOLY CROSS ENERGY 970.947.5425 (tel) 970.945.4081 (fax) 5/1/12 Contact: Jeff Vroom Yroom hol cross.com XCEL Energy 970.262.4024 (tel) 970.262.4038 (fax) Contacts: Ronnie Bureta ronnie.'.bureta xcelener .com EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITA- TION DISTRICT 970.477.5435 (tel) 970.477.5434 (fax) Contact: Tug Birk tbirk erwsd.or COMCAST CABLE 970.619.0752 (tel) 970.468 -2672 (fax) Contact: Tony Hildreth tony hildreth cable.comcast.com CDOT (Only in CDOT Right -of -way) 970.683.6284 (tel) Contact: Dan Roussin Daniel. roussinO dot.state.co.us NOTES: Utility locations must be obtained before digging. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right -of -way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.479.2198. It is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies for re- approval & re- verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. T OF. ) MAY 1 2012 7 9: Oa /5T . t 6:08 /Nn. 7600000823. P 2 UTILITY APPROVAL & VERIFICATION This #orm serves to verify that the proposed improvements wilt not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing ycwr utility plan and schedul- ing installations. A site plan, including grading plan, ilocx plan, and elevations, shall be submitted to the following utilities for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comrtients within that timeframe please contact The Town of Vail Subject Property Address: 232 West Meadow Drive Primarvr Contact/ Owner Representative: Berglund Architects �1�Aj'j1. C� tl.� -1- � r''r�mo Primary Contact/Owner Representative Signature Lot!_______ Block T _ Subdivision: VVFil 2 Phone: (970) 926 -4301 Plans Dated: (Bev. 4) 4 -20 -12 NQTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right -of -way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.479.2298. 3. It is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4, The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies.for re- approval & re- verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. Authorized Signature ,� Comments 4Date Cet'iT,, LirJiC )70.468.6860f tel) r `� ) )70.468.0672(fax) ✓ p :ontacts: Samuel Tooiey msa�l,tooleYr� r1e5t !bm rv7'v _ � • cvM L. / -- � 17-- (CEL HIGH PRESSU GAS _ )70.262.4076 (tel) )70.468.1401 (fax) :ontact: Rich Sisneros ichard.sisn(eir osCc�x gl ntrgy_com 4OLY CROSS ENERGY )70.947.5471 (tel) )70.945.4081 (fax) Antact: Jeff Vroom vrootn@)holycross.com (CEL Energy�� )70.262.4038 (fax) )70.162.4050 (tel) Dontacts: Louise Timson oulse.tlmsQn@)(celenergy, ohm EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANTTA rION DISTRICT 170,477.5435 (tel) )70.477.5434 (fax) :ontact: Tug Birk �irk�erwsd.�rg .:OMCAST CABLE )70.930.4713 (tel) )70.468.2672 (fax) : ontact: Michael Johnson Adiael,-johnson@cable.comcast.com CDOT (Only in CDOT Right -of -way) ,;70.683.6284 (tel) Contact: Dan Roussin Daniel.roussin@ dot.state.co.us NQTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right -of -way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.479.2298. 3. It is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4, The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies.for re- approval & re- verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. N UTILITY APPROVAL Lei VERIFICATION TITis forin serves to verify Ihal this proposed improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services. and also to verify service availability and Ioc;.i4on for rte.•: (x)nstrtrction .aatel should t;t: used in conjunction with pepHong your utility plan and sche(iul• ing installations. A site plarr, including gradim Plan, flow. plan. and elevations, shall be submilte:d to the following utilities for approval and verification. PLEASE". ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. If you are unable: to obtain comments within that tinieframe please conlact The: 'rown of Vail. Subject Property Address: 232 -West Meadow Drive Primary Contact! Owner Representative: Berglund Architects t? i 1-i1( a Plans Dated i Lot 7 Rlock Subdivision: VVf°il.2 Phone: (910) 926 -4301 Primary Contact/Owner Representative Signature (Re-.v 4) 4420„12 NOTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be IIX4 fired for any improv( rvients within a sl:reeL right-of-way. Contact: the Public: Works Department for verification 970.,179.2198. 3. it is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contrct /Owner Representative iS requireds to subrl1it any revised drawings to the above agencies for rep - approval & re- verification if Lhe submitted planes are ialtere(t in any way after the authorized signature date. Authorized Signature `` ' Comments Datr. CENTURYTEL __...,.�____......__._. .._._...._..�__�. ..... _..____..._ 970.468,6860(tel) c. 370.4G8.0672(fax) I Contacts: Sarnuel Tooley samuei.Looigy.Sci g}vesi ,com. -.- XCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS 970.262,4076 (tel) 970.468.1401. (fax) Contact: Rich Sisneros richard si�neros(y?xte�I�llergy.cArn y! — HOLY CROSS ENERGY 970.947.5471 (tel) 970.945.1081 (fa),) Contact: Jiff Vroorn j vroorn@11i olycr oss. corn XCEL Energy 970.262.4038 (fax) 970.262.4050 (tel) Contacts: I.ouise Tiinson Iquise, tirilsotT��xcele�ergy xun EAGLE RIVfett WATER & SANiTA- TION DISTRICT 970.477.54,15 (tel) 970.477.5434 (fax) Contact: Tug Birk kfzil�Ci?�ervsti_pCg COMCAST CABLE 970.~13(}.471.3 (tel) 7 ?d -qas y/0 ( "ontact: Michael )ohmon i1ie:lTiiE'.l._ UIirTSUn ;4�Cii�t�.(".OntC.iT51.COni „rn ((�y 1,2 CDOT (only in CDOT Right.-O'-way) 970.()83.G f.A (tel) , conted: Dan Roussin Daniel roussin�? }dalstat(�. co. us NOTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be IIX4 fired for any improv( rvients within a sl:reeL right-of-way. Contact: the Public: Works Department for verification 970.,179.2198. 3. it is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contrct /Owner Representative iS requireds to subrl1it any revised drawings to the above agencies for rep - approval & re- verification if Lhe submitted planes are ialtere(t in any way after the authorized signature date. UTILITY APPROVAL & VERIFICATION This form serves to verify that the proposed improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and schedul- ing installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitted to the following utilities for approval and verification, PLEASE ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that timeframe please contact The Town of Vail. Subject Property Address: 232 West Meadow Drive Lot 7 Block Subdivision: VVFil.2 Primary Contact I Owner Representative: Berglund Architects Phone: (970) 926 -4301 /\n!�� (�iLu 7 Tr)Z- J �EtW, Plans Dated: (Rev. 4) 4 -20 -12 Primary Contact/Owner Representative Signature —. NOTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right -of -way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.479.2198. 3. It is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies,for re- approval & re- verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. Authorized Signature Comments Date CENTURY TEL 970.468.6860(tel) 970.468.0672(fax) Contacts: Samuel Tooley samuel.tooley(@awest.com XCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS 970.262.4076 (tel) 970.468.1401 (fax) Contact: Rich Sisneros richard.sisneros xceleueryy_.com HOLY CROSS ENERGY 970.947.5471 (tel) 970.945.4081 (fax) Contact: Jeff Vroom jvroom@holycross.com XCEL Energy 970.262.4038 (fax) 970.262.4050 (tel) Contacts: Louise Timson louise.timson@xcelenergy.com EAGLE RIVER WATER &SANITA- TION DISTRICT 970.477.5435 (tel) V �ar{s }r c{n�r. (1.Qvti e✓ I `Z 970.477.5434 (fax) Contact: Tug Birk + r c r j'Gq�rLi�rtS JJ J f tbirkCa�erwsd.org COMCAST CABLE 970.930.4713 (tel) 970.468.2672 (fax) Contact: Michael Johnson Michael-johnson@cable.comcast.com CDOT (Only in CDOT Right -of -way) 970.683.6284 (tel) Contact: Dan Roussin Daniel.roussin @dot.state.co.us NOTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right -of -way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.479.2198. 3. It is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies,for re- approval & re- verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. UTILITY APPROVAL & VERIFICATION This form serves to verify that the proposed Improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and schedul- ing installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitted to the following utilities for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that timeframe please contact The Town of Vail. Subject Property Address: 232 West Meadow Drive Lot 7 Block Subdivision: WPrl.2 :.Primary Berglund Architects Contact /Owner Representative: g Phone: ( 97Q ) 926 -4301 _ Primary Contact/Owner Representative Signature Plans hated: (Rev. 4) 4 -20 -12 NOTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right -of -way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.479.2198. 3. It Is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contact /Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies, for re- approval & re- verification if the submitted plans are altered In any way after the authorized signature date. Authorized Signature Comments Date CENTURY TEL 970.468.6860(tel) 970.468.0672(fax) Contacts: Samuel Tooley samuel.tooley @gvvest.com XCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS 970.262.4076 (tel) 970.468.1401 (fax) Contact: Rich Sisneros richard.sisneros xcelener .com HOLY CROSS ENERGY 970.947.5471 (tel) 970.945.4081 (fax) Contact: Jeff Vroom jvroom@holycross.com XCEL Energy C. Louise Timson After close review of the site plans 5 -7 -2012 970.262.4038 (fax) XCEL does not have any issues 970.262.4050 (tel) with the new location for the lift Contacts: Louise Tirnson station. louise.timson xcelenergyNcom EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITA- TION DISTRICT 970.477.5435 (tel) 970.477.5434 (fax) Contact: Tug Birk tbirk erwsd.or COMCAST CABLE 970.930.4713 (tel) 970.468.2672 (fax) Contact: Michael Johnson Michael 'ohnson @cable.comcast.com CDOT (Only in CDOT Right -of -way) 970.683.6284 (tel) Contact: Dan Roussin Daniel.roussln @dot.state.co.us NOTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right -of -way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.479.2198. 3. It Is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contact /Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies, for re- approval & re- verification if the submitted plans are altered In any way after the authorized signature date. UTIL2iY APPROVAL & VERIFICATION This form serves to verify that the proposed improvements will not impe.t any existing or proposed utility services, and a:so to verify service availability and location for naw construction and s; -:vuld be uses 7n conjunction with preparing your utility plan and schedul- Ing Installations A site plan, ir:cluding grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitted to the following utilities for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments wlth'n that tirneframe please contact The Town of Vail. Subject Property Address: 232 West Meadow Drive Primary Contact/ Owner Representative: Berglund Architects >&n k Nk I- I i , CC Lot 7 Block Subdivision: Phone: (970) 926 -430' 'N• ENA«- Plans Dated: (Rev. 41 4 20 -12 Primary ContactlOwner Representative Signature VVFil.2 NOTES: 1. Utility locations roust be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any Improvements within a street right -of -way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.979.2198. 3. It Is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies for re- approval & re- verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. Ti 1 Tn•!` 7Tr17 IAL1 Tn"T ---,n I 7.1/1. 1 n . —I .I I -x' - I- Authorized Signature Comments Datr CENTURY TEL 970.468.6860(tel) 970.468.0672(fax) Contacts: Samuel Tooley samu el, tooiev@gt .com XCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS 970.262.4076 (tel) 970.468.1401 (fax) Contact: Rich slsneros y2o.� Qv(!�� -y'- l richard.slsnergs�cel Eyrrc v.com T_ c�o d- - HOLY CROSS Ely Ray 970.94,5471 (tel) 970,945.4081 (fax) Contact: )eff Vroorn jvroom @hoiycross, corn XCEL Energy _ -- 970.262.4038 (fax) 970.262.4050 (LEI) Contacts: Louise Timson (QL,ise,t+mson *xc leng _P_rQY.cM EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITA- TION DISTRICT 970.477.5435 (tel) 970.477.5434 (fax) Contact: Tug Birk tbirk �erwsd.ora COMCAST CABLE 970.930.4713 (tel) 97D.468.2672 (far) Contact: Michael Johnson Michael-hnson cable.ccmcast.cam CDOT (Only in CDOT Right -of -way) 970.683.6284 (tel) Contact: Dan Roussin Daniel. roussi n Adot.sta to -co. u s NOTES: 1. Utility locations roust be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any Improvements within a street right -of -way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.979.2198. 3. It Is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies for re- approval & re- verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. Ti 1 Tn•!` 7Tr17 IAL1 Tn"T ---,n I 7.1/1. 1 n . —I .I I -x' - I- ��- 0 000 ' •/{ i l \ LOT B Nr -1` — LOT \ "53'rn..,r • �- LOT VJ i / / i Syr— — ��� `a..».++� /% , _�•%• ® � i " -� r � _� r ` —� — \ ,- — — `�• ^,,`• .�... -- � '- Imo^ -/ { r' ,% TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprinted on 03 -08 -2012 at 15:30:14 03/08/2012 Statement ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Statement Number: R120000133 Amount: $4,332.34 03/08/201203:30 PM Payment Method: Check Init: DR Notation: CK# 11662 MERV LAPIN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B12 -0023 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Parcel No: 2101 - 071 - 0100 -4 Site Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Location: 232 WEST MEADOW DRIVE Total Fees: 105,058.79 This Payment: $4,332.34 Total ALL Pmts: 104,858.79 Balance: $200.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------- - - - - -- ------------------------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- UT 11000003106000 USE TAX 416 4,332.34 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprinted on 03 -08 -2012 at 15:33:11 03/08/2012 Statement ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Statement Number: R120000134 Amount: $200.00 03/08/201203:32 PM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: DR Notation: VISA BENNO SCHEIDEGGER ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B12 -0023 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Parcel No: 2101 - 071 - 0100 -4 Site Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Location: 232 WEST MEADOW DRIVE Total Fees: 105,058.79 This Payment: $200.00 Total ALL Pmts: 105,058.79 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------- - - - - -- ------------------------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- UT 11000003106000 USE TAX 496 200.00 NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES 6 ��rrOF . Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Permit #: B12 -0023 Job Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAI L Location......: 232 WEST MEADOW DRIVE Parcel No....: 210107101004 OWNER LAPIN, MERVYN 02/14/2012 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL CO 81657 ARCHITECT BERGLUND ARCHITECTS PO BOX 2378 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: C000002069 02/14/2012 Phone: 970-926-4301 APPLICANT LAPIN, MERVYN 02/14/2012 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL CO 81657 CONTRACTOR VAIL CUSTOM BUILDERS PO BOX 2809 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: C000003221 02/14/2012 Phone: 970-904-0512 Description: new duplex home. existing house, detached 2nd unit and existing nonconforming deck to be demolished Occupancy: R -3 Type Construction: VB ++++++++++++++++++++*+#*************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * + * * + * * * + * + + * + * *+ FEE SUMMARY Project #: Applied.....: Issued... PRJ 11 -0071 02/14/2012 03/08/2012 Valuation: $3,400,000.00 Building Permit ------ - - - - -> $14,368.75 Bldg Plan Check ----- - - - - -> $9,339.69 Use Tax Fee------------------ - - - - -> $67,800.00 Electrical Permit ---- - - - - -> $1,288.00 Elec Plan Check ------ - - - - -> $837.20 Restuarant Plan Review--- - - - - -> $0.00 Mechanical Permit - - - - - -> $5,620.00 Mech Plan Check ---- - - - - -> $1,405.00 Additional Fees--------------- - - - - -> $0.00 Plumbing Permit --- - - - - -> $2,310.00 Plmb Plan Check ---- - - - - -> $577.50 Recreation Fee--------------- - - - - -> $1,492.65 Investigation------------------ - - - - -> $0.00 Will Call ------------------------------ > $20.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES --- ---------- > 105,058.79 Payments -- ---------------------------- > 105,058.79 BALANCE DUE------------------ - - - - -> $0.00 DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY -FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 A 4:00 PM. Signature of Owner or Contractor Date &ILAID R. Print Name combination permit_012811 ffowl CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF Permit #: B12 -0023 Owner: LAPIN, MERVYN MEADOW DRIVE Cond: CON0012438 The applicant shall provide the Town of Vail construction access to the adjacent Gore Creek stream tract. The purpose of this access is to facilitate the removal of the existing bridge, removal of the existing timber wall abutments, re- grading and re- vegetation of the stream tract, the installation of stream bank stabilization, and other associated construction activities. Cond: CON0012439 A Revocable Right of Way Permit will be required prior to Project recieving a TCO or Final CO. Required work in Gore Creek for removal of Bridge and cribbing is on going. PW, Chad Salli is working on design and permitting. PW has contact General Contractor on cost estimates to do the work on behalf of the TOV. Cond: CON0012445 Radon system inspections required combination permit_012811 Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Location: 232 WEST TUWN 0VNL Permit #: B12 -0023 Owner: LAPIN, MERVYN MEADOW DRIVE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Location: 232 WEST Item: 00010 BLDG - FOOTING Item: 00020 BLDG - Foundation /Steel Item: 00021 PLAN -ILC Foundation Plan Item: 00110 ELEC - Service Item: 00120 ELEC -Rough Item: 00200 MECH -Rough Item: 00210 PLMB- Underground Item: 00220 PLMB- Rough /D.W.V. Item: 00230 PLMB- Rough/Water Item: 00240 PLMB -Gas Piping Item: 00250 PLMB -Pool /Hot Tub Item: 00260 PLMB -Misc. Item: 00310 MECH- Heating Item: 00315 PLMB -Gas Piping Item: 00320 MECH- Exhaust Hoods Item: 00330 MECH - Supply Air Item: 00340 MECH -Misc. Item: 00410 Special Inspect - progress rept Item: 00022 PLAN -ILC FRAMING Item: 00030 BLDG - Framing Item: 00050 BLDG - Insulation Item: 00060 BLDG - Sheetrock Nail Item: 00070 BLDG -Misc. Item: 00190 ELEC -Final Item: 00290 PLMB -Final Item: 00390 MECH -Final Item: 00420 Special Inspect -final rept Item: 00533 PLAN -TEMP. C/O Item: 00530 BLDG -Temp. C/O Item: 00540 BLDG -Final C/O Item: 00542 PLAN -FINAL Item: 00090 BLDG -Final combination permit-012811 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R120000127 Amount: $23,586.7603/08 /201210:21 AM Payment Method: Check Init: SAB Notation: 11640 - MERV LAPIN Permit No: B12 -0023 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Parcel No: 2101 -071- 0100 -4 Site Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Location: 232 WEST MEADOW DRIVE Total Fees: 105,058.79 This Payment: $23,586.76 Total ALL Pmts: $32,926.45 Balance: $72,132.34 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts ------ - - - - -- -------------- - - - BP 00100003111100 - -- ------------------------ - - - - -- BUILDING PERMIT FEES 14,368.75 EP 00100003111100 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 1,288.00 MP 00100003111100 MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES 5,620.00 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES .01 PP 00100003111100 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES 2,310.00 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Statement Number: R120000128 Amount: $67,600.0003/08 /201210:23 AM Payment Method: Check Init: SAB Notation: 11641 - MERV LAPIN Permit No: B12 -0023 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Parcel No: 2101 - 071 - 0100 -4 Site Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Location: 232 WEST MEADOW DRIVE Total Fees: 105,058.79 This Payment: $67,600.00 Total ALL Pmts: 100,526.45 Balance: $4,532.34 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 2,819.69 RF 11100003112700 RECREATION FEES 1,492.65 UT 11000003106000 USE TAX 40 63,267.66 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 20.00 Job Name: 7y��, /� [, Job Address: 1V , VF1�i Permit No.: 6 1,2 SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT (To applicants of projects requiring Special Inspection or Testing per Section 1701 of the IBC) The owner or his/her representative, on the advice of the design professional in responsible charge, shall complete, seal, sign and submit a copy of the Special Inspection Agreement and Structural Tests Scheduled to the Town of Vail for review and approval. Signatures are required on both pages; photocopied or faxed signatures are acceptable. The owner and his/her general contractor, where applicable, shall also acknowledge the following conditions applicable to Special Inspection Testing: 1. Contractor is responsible for proper notification to the Inspection or Testing agency for items iisted.(Page 1) (IBC 1704) 2. Only the testing laboratory should take samples and transport them to their laboratory. 3. Copies of all laboratory reports and inspections are to be sent directly to the Town of Vail by the Testing agency on a weekly basis. 4. Inspection agency to submit names and qualifications of on -site special inspectors to the Town of Vail for review and approval.( Page 2) 5. The special inspector is responsible to immediately notify the Town of Vail Building Official in writing of any concerns and /or problems encountered. 6. It is the responsibility of the contractor to review the Town of Vail approved plans for additional inspection or testing requirements that may be noted. A pre - construction conference at the job site is recommended to review special inspection procedures. 7. The special inspector shall use only the Town of Vail approved drawings. 8. All special inspection field reports must be left on site for review by the Town of Vail staff prior to required inspections or re- inspections. BEFORE OCCUPANCY WILL BE GRANTED: The special inspection agency shall submit a signed and sealed statement that all items requiring testing and inspection were fulfilled and reported. Those items not tested and /or inspected shall be noted in this statement. A copy of the statement shall be maintained at the job site for the Building Inspector's review prior to final inspection. Acknowled ement: Owner: i t 2 -IS -Iti Sign ure Print Name Date Special InspeC(o) 6—e0 C�1r1 Agency: V t a A u vi 2' 7-12. Signat ��" to Project �� itutn5 `fi P e t U Z-9 -% Arch /Eng: Signature Contractor: Signature -3- Print Name Date 0 IL Print Name Date FEB 2 3 1012 TOWN OF VAIL TO P OF Project Name: Owners Name Testing InspectoF Agency: _sue Testing Inspection SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING SCHEDULE (IBC 1704) n C Permit m —&0-22D— � 4 1 �4• ,-P" �r'e1A Date l cc.a'a *u Z'7 -tz Print Zirne Date Hereby certifies that the Testinglinspection Agency named above has been engaged to perform structural tests and inspections during construction as checked below, to satisfy all applicable portions of the Building Code. Prior to final inspection, the Inspection Agency shall submit a statement that all items of designated work performed were reported. Any items checked but not tested or inspected will be noted and explained. Whenever any designated items on the list are ready for sampling, testing, or inspection, it shall be the responsibility of the contractor to give timely notice to the Inspection agency so that the required services may be performed. REINFORCING STEEL: Tensile & Send, one set per heat per tons Inspection of Placement Inspection of Welding Epoxy MASONRY: Prelim. Acceptance Tests (Masonry Units, Wall Prisms) Subsequent Tests (Mortar, Grout, Field Wall Prisms) Inspection of Placement and Grouting CONCRETE, SHOTCRFTF rRr1I IT enin "n!D eA . Concrete Shot Grout Mortar Aggregate tests for design Suitability of aggregates Mix Designs Test Panel Batch Plant Inspection Cement Grab Sample Inspect Placing Compression Tests Cast Specimens Pick -up Samples Shrinkage Bars Yield Check Air Check oo�nw Dry Unit Weight 1 CONCRETE: Reinforcing Tests Inspection of Reinforcing Placement Tendon Tests Inspection of Tendon Placement Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspection of Concrete Batching Inspection of Panel Attachment & Inserts Compression Tests Inspection of StressingiTransfer PILING, CAISSONS, CAPS, TIES: Inspection of Reinforcing Placement Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspection of Concrete Batching Spec,fy other tests, inspections or special instructions required. 0 UNDERPINNING: Temporary/Permanent Inspection of Steel Fabricaticn Inspection of Reinforcing & Forms Inspection of Concrete Placerent Inspection of Tiebacks SOIL NAILS: Temporary Shoring Permanent Wall STRUCTURAL STEEL: Sample & Test (List specific members below) Shop Identification & Welding Inspection Shop Ultrasonic Inspection Shop Radiography Field Welding Inspection Field Bolting Inspection Field Ultrasonic Inspection Field Radiography Metal Deck Welding Inspection FIREPROOFING: Inspection & Placement SOILS: Acceptance Tests Mcisture- Density Determination Field Density Drilled Piers Deep Foundation STRUCTURAL WOOD: Inspection of Fabrication Inspection of Truss Joint Fabrication Sample & Test Components Inspection of Glu Lam Fabrication SMOKE CONTROL: SPECIAL CASES: SPECIAL INSPECTION: Seismic Resistance Wind Requirements TOWN OF VAIL ` Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970 - 479 -2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (Separate applications are required for alarm & sprinkler) Project Street Address: (Number) (Street) (Suite #) Building /Complex Name: j Contractor Informati17 / I V ,J A.- Project #: f°�) 11 ° LX» I DRB #: D11/31/O2/3 Building Permit #: 6I � - 0()o,2 3 Lot #: 7 Block # Subdivision:ViNL /LCJ�4 Z 3usiness Name: psft >Gti I NN Work Class: New ( Addition ( ) Alteration ( ) 3usiness Address: �yZ I L��� f ft�t St �� . �ZU� "ity i�S State: �G Zip: Type of Building Single - Family ( ) Duplex ( nn) Multi - Family ( ) ;ontact Name:It Commercial ( ) Other ;ontact Phone: 970- 331- 6/ 30 ;ontact E- Mail: K s Va i ruSW owner /Owner's Representative Signature ( equired) ►pplicant Information Applicant Name: a�%i4lJ Applicant Phone: ! 70 - 1/ -7z' — :5 V 3 // Applicant E -Mail: lVelZ41!D <h� �r��• Cd141 Project Information£�� Owner Name: Parcel #: Z101 07/— 7-1 (For Parcel #, contact Eagle County Assessors Office at (970- 328 -8640 or visit www.eaglecounty.us /patie) Detailed Scope and Location of Work:�(u�t' /oyi O� Z 3 Z 144 Ae4m4t. ,lj, -r�r.� , �u Z (use additional sheet if necessary) For Office Use Only: Fee Paid: Received From: V 66 �S Cash Check # lY a I CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # exp date: Auth # Date Recei O1- Jan -11 Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Both �( ) ..................... . ..... . _ Valuation of Work Included Plans Included Work Electrical ( )Yes ( )No ( )Yes ( )No ?.4oi vvo Mechanical ( )Yes ( )No (()Yes ( )No ffQo Plumbing ( )Yes ( )No (x)Yes ( )NO�f� Oo0 Building ( )Yes ( )No (/1 )Yes ( )No/,, 0! Value of all work being performed: $ 31 Zlay" 42L;0 (value based on IBC Section 109.3 & IRC Section 108.3) j Electrical Square Footage G 1 t i5 1 I tf u Date Recei O1- Jan -11 State of Colorado Asbestos Testing & Abatement Requirements Asbestos testing and abatement protects workers, homeowners, neighbors and emergency services responders from ex- posure to harmful asbestos. It is your responsibility to be in compliance with the State. Please contact the State directly for their requirements at the contact info listed below. When is asbestos testing required? ANY building projects disturbing more than these threshold levels of building materials require asbestos testing: One- and Two - Family Dwellings: 32 square feet All Others (commercial spaces, hotel rooms, etc): 160 square feet Definition of a single - family dwelling: any dwelling unit that is used primarily for a single family, including multi - family /condominium units, and fractional fee units. Asbestos testing results must be provided with your application for a building permit. Tests which identify POSITIVE results at more than 1% require abatement by a State - certified abatement contractor. The air clearance letter or form must be submitted to the Town of Vail before the building permit will be issued. Project Checklist My project falls into the category checked below: Will not disturb more than the threshold limits identified above. Tested negative, or at 1% or below (1 copies of test results included) Tested positive at more than 1 %, requires abatement (1 copies of test results included) Tips & Facts: • Even recent construction projects may include asbestos - containing materials, so buildings of gny age require testing. • The "1989 Ban" on asbestos - containing materials is commonly misunderstood. "In fact, in 1991 the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated much of the so- called "Asbestos Ban and Phaseout" rule and remanded it to the EPA. Thus, much of the original 1989 EPA ban on the U.S. manufacturing, importation, processing, or distribution in commerce of many asbestos - containing product categories was set aside and did not take effect." - CDPHE Asbestos test results should be submitted to: Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 S Frontage Rd, Vail, CO, 81657. Town of Vail Contact: Fire Prevention Bureau Vail Fire Department 75 S Frontage Rd Fire—inspectors@vailgov.com 970 - 479 -2252 www.vailgov.com State of Colorado Contact: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Asbestos Compliance Assistance Group 303 - 692 -3158 asbestos@state.co.us www.cdphe.state.co.us 01- Jan -11 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: 8120000078 Amount: $9,339.69 02/14/201201:44 PM Payment Method: Check Init: SAB Notation: 6421 -VAIL VALLEY CUSTOM BUILDERS Permit No: B12 -0023 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Parcel No: 2101 - 071 - 0100 -4 Site Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Location: 232 WEST MEADOW DRIVE Total Fees: 101,440.94 This Payment: $9,339.69 Total ALL Pmts: $9,339.69 Balance: $92,101.25 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------- - - - - -- ------------------------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 9,339.69 G( oTtech • HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL h{epworth-Ravlak (_ieotechnical, Inc. 5020 C(11111ty Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970. 945.7933 Fax: 970 - 945.5454 email: hpkeoghpgeotech.com SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE 232 WEST MEADOW DRIVE LOT 7, VAIL VILLAGE 2ND FILING VAIL, COLORADO JOB NO. 111 113A JUNE 29, 2011 PREPARED FOR: MERV LAPIN 232 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, COLORADO 81657 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ...................... ............................... PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ............ ............................... SITECONDITIONS .................................. ............................... . - 2- FIELD EXPLORATION .................................. ............................... - 2- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ...................... ............................... ............... - 2 - FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS ............................................................... - 3- DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS .............................. FOUNDATIONS..................................................................... _ ............................... FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS - 3- .......................... ............................... FLOORSLABS - 4- ............................................... ............................... UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM - ..................... SURFACEDRAINAGE ......................................... ............................... .......... - 7 - LIMITATIONS.................................. ............................... . ............................... - 7 - FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Car FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located at 232 West Meadow Drive, Lot 7, Vail Village 2nd Filing, Vail, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Mery Lapin dated May 11, 2011. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and Iaboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a one and two story structure partly above crawlspace and partly above a basement level with slab -on -grade floor. The garage will be at the main level with slab -on -grade floor. The existing residence will be razed for the new construction, see Figure 1. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 4 to 10 feet. The excavation will typically be kept shallow except for the basement area that could be impacted by shallow groundwater level. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re- evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. Job No. 111 113A - GA tech -2- SITE CONDITIONS The lot is occupied by a one and two story residence partly overlying a basement level. The ground surface is relatively flat with a gentle slope down to the south. Gore Creek borders the south side of the lot roughly 12 feet below the middle of the lot. A water feature follows the east side of the lot. Vegetation generally consists of landscape grass, aspen and evergreen trees. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on May 25, 2011. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck- mounted CME -45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. The boring locations were limited to the front, north part of the lot. Truck drill rig access was not possible to the rear part of the lot. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a I % inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D -1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values arc shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of about 4 feet of fill overlying medium dense, silty sand and gravel to the drilled depths of 16 to 20 feet. The soils became sandier below about 15 %a feet in ""' Job No. 111 113A '_ tech -3- Boring 2. The existing fill consists of mixed granular soils and topsoil and could vary in type and depth across the property. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and gradation analyses. Results of gradation analyses performed on small diameter drive samples (minus 1 % inch fraction) of the natural granular soils are shown on Figure 4. Free water was encountered at a depth of about 9 feet in the borings at the time of drilling and was measured at a depth of about 7 feet when measured on June 28, 2011. The water level rise appears to coincide with rise in Gore Creek level. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The natural granular soils are suitable to support lightly loaded spread footings with moderate bearing capacity and relatively low settlement potential. Care should be taken to remove all fill and debris from the existing development. Excavation dewatering could be needed depending on the time of year and Gore Creek water level. The below grade parts of the new residence will need to be protected against water level rise. We assume the existing residence is protected by an underdrain system similar to one needed to protect the proposed residence. If a watertight system is proposed for the new construction, we should be contacted for additional recommendations. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils. JUU 1`IV. 111 11,5A - _ __tech -4- The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 ps£ Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 42 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) The existing fill, debris, topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the relatively dense natural granular soils. If water seepage is encountered, the footing areas should be dewatered before concrete placement. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on -site granular soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to Job No. 111 113A C,V&tech -5- mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the on -site granular soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.45. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 250 pcf (buoyant condition). The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be a granular material compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Job No. 111 MA tech FLOOR SLABS The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab - on- grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 6 inch layer of free - draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on -site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Free water was encountered at shallow depth and it has been our experience that the water level will rise during spring runoff and local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wail backfill surrounded above the invert level with free - draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum I% to a suitable gravity outlet above the 100 year flood level of Gore Creek. The basement underslab gravel should be frequently connected to the perimeter foundation drain with interior lateral drains. Free - draining granular Job No. 111 113A Get!teCh -7- material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 2 feet deep. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free - draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) The water feature along the east side of the lot should be water tight. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is Job No. I I I 113A Ge tech concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different fiom those described in this report, we should be notified so that re- evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK G ICAL, INC. to 0 T 9 15222 :* Steven L. Pawlak, P.E ,4 Reviewed by: CO OF Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. SLP /ksw cc: Berglund Architects — Attn: Keegan Winkeller Job No. III 113A Geortech APPROXIMATE SCALE 1 + =40' 8130 8120 18122 �8124 Q t-./ \ % PROPOSED 8 L RL'SIDE VCE \ �ps LOT 8 r EXISTING LOT 7 ,HADED) RESIDENCE L , j �, w f WEST , - LOT 6 MEADOW DRIVE / / I \ j BORING f BORING 2 8132./ \ ~ ~~ \ WEST MEADOW DRIVE IF 111113A H V 6e w Ch LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS I Figure 1 H�woR'%t*PwwWC Gmar�crmncw� LEGEND: ® FILL; sandy silt and clay with gravel and organics, moist, frim , black. oe eb• SAND AND GRAVEL (SM -GM); silty, cobbles, possible boulders, medium dense, moist to wet with depth, brown, sub - angular rocks. SAND (SM); silty, gravelly, medium dense, wet, brown. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch 1. D. split spoon sample, ASTM D -1586. 16/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 16 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the SPT sampler 12 inches. 0,35 Free water level in boring and number of days following drilling measurement was taken. --> Depth at which boring had caved following drilling. oe Indicates 1 2 - inch diameter hand - slotted PVC pipe installed to depth shown. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on May 24, 2011 with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided and checked by instrument level. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. Water level readings shown on the logs were made at the time and under the conditions indicated. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( %) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 111 113A , LEGEND AND NOTES I Figure 3 HEPwoan&Pwwur cff , ....., G( o'f*tech IIFPIAMPTH- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL July 8, 2011 Revised July 11, 2011 Mery Lapin 232 West Meadow Drive Ie1 worth P.n lak Gcotechnical. In(- 5020 Cmirt(y Road 154 Gle[AWOOd Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 email: hpge�?hpgcorcch•cc�m Vail, Colorado 81657 Job No. l 11 113A Subject: Supplemental Recommendations for Crawlspace and Basement Areas, Proposed Residence, 232 West Meadow Drive, Lot 7, Vail Village 2" d Filing, Vail, Colorado Gentlemen: As requested by Berglund Architects, we are providing additional recommendations to protect the crawlspace and basement areas from potential groundwater impacts. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated June 29, 2011, Job No. 1 1 1 1 13A. We have currently been authorized to evaluate groundwater flow conditions for potential dewatering of the basement excavation. The basement level will be constructed somewhat below groundwater level based on the information obtained from our previous study. The crawlspace grade appears to be about 2 feet above groundwater level. We understand that the existing foundation drain outlet to Gore Creek can probably be used for the new foundation drain outlet but may be restricted for more frequent flows such as pumping to keep the basement level dewatered. Crawlspace Area: The planned crawlspace grade should be above high groundwater level and the underdrain recommendations presented in our previous report are acceptable to protect this area fi-om minor water impacts such as spring thaw and snowmelt. Interior lateral subdrains placed on about 20 foot centers and at least one foot deep can be used to further protect the grade from wetting. The interior drains should be connected to the perimeter foundation drain that all slope at a minimum I% to gravity outlet above the 100 year flood level of Gore Creek. The crawlspace level can be covered with drain gravel, a moisture barrier or concrete slab. Basement Level: The basement will potentially extend to below groundwater level. The basement is currently planned to be constructed watertight rather than be protected by pumping. The foundation can consist of a monolithic slab and footing (structural slab) system designed for structural loadings and buoyant forces. It appears that a high groundwater elevation of 8126 feet can be assumed to calculate hydrostatic loadings. The foundation slab and walls should have double protection against leakage. We have seen Mery Lapin July 8, 2011 Revised July 11, 2011 Page 2 this consist of an impervious membrane placed on a crushed rock leveling course below the structural mat that is covered with a 6 inch gravel drain layer and impervious membrane overlain with the normal floor slab. The bottom impervious membrane should extend up the side of the structural slab and onto the foundation wall. The under slab gravel will need to be connected to a sump and pump designed to collect possible leakage through the structural slab. The top of the structural slab should be sloped at %z% to the sump pit. As an alternative, a crawlspace could be provided below the basement level and above the structural waterproof slab. The perimeter walls, connections or joints and perforations such as for utilities should also be made watertight. We should review the various details when available. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH — PAWLAK ICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P. ' * 15222 J ) 3 Rev. by: DEH WIAL SLP/ksw Attachment: Figure 2 (revised July 8, 2011) — Logs of Exploratory Borings cc: Berglund Architects — Attn: Keegan Winkeller (keeean@berglundarchitects corn) Job No. 111 113A BORING 1 ELEV. =8132' BORING 2 ELEV. =8133' 8135 PROPOSED MAIN FLOOR, ELEV. =8134' 8130 PROPOSED CRAWLSPACE GRADE, ELEV,= 8127.7' e p. gip•: 30/12 8125 35 0'0 35 LL 0 Qo: 0 c a :• 16/12 o!. +4 =12 w 8120 - 200 =16 — 8115 8110 L-t-ci ,qm 60/12 8135 3/6,13/6 8130 WC =7.9 +4 =31 -200 =14 PROPOSED BASEMENT 9/12 FLOOR, ELEV. = 8124.7' 8125 20/12_ Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. m a� C 0 8120 8115 8110 Revised on July 8, 2011 H 111 113A CI''i LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS TFigure 2 HepwoRTH -Pwwwc GEOTpC��c,,u, G e"lot t h HEPWORTH- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Project VG I Work Item Sheet of bate By gm log, N(,. I -35� Q _ /4, et I is; q ., Sit Glenwood Springs 970- 945 -7988 • Parker 303 -841 -7119 Colorado Springs 719- 633 -5562 • Sihverthorne 970 -468 -1989 F*tec h HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL August 26, 2011 Hepworth- Pawlak (r ,acluiical, Inc. i020 Comity Read 154 Glem%o� )d Spring,, ('oh cid, , ,61601 Phone: 970-945 -795 Fax: 970. 945 -8454 email: hpgeoAhpreorech.com Mery Lapin 232 West Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 Job No. l 1 1 113A Subject: Groundwater Monitoring and Testing for Evaluation of Basement Excavation Dewatering, Proposed Residence, 232 West Meadow Drive, Vail, Colorado Gentlemen: As requested, Hepworth- Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed additional subsurface exploration for evaluation of groundwater conditions and possible dewatering methods for the basement level of the proposed residence at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for penneability testing to Mery Lapin dated June 30, 2011. The data obtained and our findings based on the subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for the *Am- residence design, report dated June 29, 2011, and provided recommendations for the basement design below groundwater level, report dated July 11, 2011, Job No. 1 1 1 113A. Basement Excavation: Excavation for the proposed construction will be impacted by relatively shallow groundwater conditions at the property. The basement is proposed to be about 8 feet deep and either be constructed watertight or protected by an underdrain system to keep groundwater below the basement floor level. A description of possible watertight construction with underdrain backup in the event of liner leakage was provided in our July 11, 2011 letter. The construction will likely extend down into the groundwater and excavation dewatering will be required. The amount of groundwater flow for excavation dewatering, and potential flow from an underdrain system to keep the groundwater level below the basement floor was evaluated by additional exploratory drilling and observation well construction. Subsurface Conditions: An additional exploratory boring was drilled near the southern part of the building area (Boring 3) and observation wells were constructed in the boreholes for groundwater flow testing at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. Slotted PVC pipe was set in Borings 2 and 3 for hydraulic conductivity testing by others. The logs of the borings are presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 0 Parker 303 -441 -7119 0 - c C.;t�lt,r�adt� �prinQs 71� -633 -7562 • Si(verrhtn-ne 970 -468-1949 -2- 1 to 4 feet of topsoil or fill soils, consist of medium dense, silty sand and gravel with cobbles to the drilled depth of 16 to 21 feet. The soils are somewhat stratified and contain some silty sand layers. Results of gradation analyses performed on samples of sand and gravel (minus 11/2 inch fraction) obtained from the borings are presented on Figures 4 and 5. Free water was encountered in the borings between about 3 and 7 feet below ground surface when measured between May and July. The last water level measurement on August 17, 2011 indicates a water level drop of roughly one foot in the last month. Hydraulic Conductivity Testing and Flow Estimate: Ganser Lujan & Associates conducted hydraulic conductivity (permeability) testing in the constructed monitoring wells at the subject site on August 4, 2011. The results of the testing are attached in the Ganser Lujan & Associates report of August 12, 2011. We have discussed possible methods to mitigate groundwater impacts on the building excavation with Don Ganser such as a subdrain system around the basement area. Either gravity flow discharge through the existing subdrain system outlet pipe or sumps and pumps would result in surface flow discharge. The amount of flow was calculated by Mr. Ganser and the results are presented in his August 23, 2011 letter. The estimated design flow of 100 gallons per minute assumes a groundwater level drawdown of 3 feet and the average permeability of 10 feet per day. Variations in the drawdown depth and permeability will affect the actual flow. Although Mr. Ganser recommends additional groundwater flow analysis, the estimated flow rate of 100 gpm appears reasonable for preliminary design purposes. The actual flow rate can be further evaluated at the time of construction if the additional pump test study is not performed. The flow estimate can also be assumed for the completed structure if an underdrain is used to control groundwater impacts on the basement Ievel. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1 and to the depths shown on Figure 2, and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. if the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re- evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the Job No. l it 113A clecPt,,h -3- project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to d verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please let us know. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK Steven L. Pawlak, P.E Rev. by: DEH SLP /1jg 51 15222 2 INC. Attachments: Figure 1 — Location of Exploratory Borings Figure 2 — Logs of Exploratory Borings Figure 3 — Legend and Notes Figures 4 and 5 — Gradation Test Results Hydraulic Conductivity Testing, Ganser Lujan & Associates, 8/12/11 Preliminary Estimate of Construction Dewatering Inflow, Ganser Lujan & Associates, 8/23/11 cc: Berglund Architects — Attn: Keegan Winkeller Job No.l 1 1 113A G(� @ch APPROXIMATE SCALE 1 " =40' �O 8130 �\ \ w // \ \ \\ 8120 U \\ \� �� 8122 LL 1 C \ J� 8124 w I N, Q / \ PROPOSED 6 BORING 3 1 L RESIDENCE \ ��'6 I • EXISTING \\ Cr- LOT 6 RESIDENCE LOT 7 (SHADED) L__ WEST �- - -i LOT 8 MEADOW - l DRIVE / • L `- -� l \ f BORING i BORING 2 8132 / • �j WEST MEADOW DRIVE cpj 07 BENCH MARK: CATCH BASIN GRATE; ELEV. = 8135.7, AS GIVEN. 111 113A I HF-P4 O ftE Cn, _. I LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS I Figure 1 BORING 1 BORING 2 ELEV.= 8132.7' ELEV.= 8133.6' 8135 PROPOSED MAIN FLOOR, ELEV. =8134' 8130 3/6,13/6 • °. PROPOSED CRAWLSPACE GRADE, ELEV.= 8127.T WC =7.9 ° oa +4 =31 •p., 30/12 -200=14 35,49 49 9/12 4 - 8125 -85^ 45,85 — _ o: _ 0 _ 0, — ° S. PROPOSED BASEMENT a�• FLOOR, ELEV.= 8124.7' m a> LL 0 8120 W 8115 8110 8105 BORING 3 ELEV.= 8129.2' Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. 8135 8130 8125 8/12 a� 8120 •p:: 16112 °• +4 =35 -200=14 +4 =12 8115 21/12 - 200 =16 - 200 =24 �o o• a 20/12 60/12 BORING 3 ELEV.= 8129.2' Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. 8135 8130 8125 8/12 a� 8120 0 32/12 +4 =35 -200=14 _m w 8115 21/12 +4 =20 - 200 =24 8110 38/12 8105 Revised on July 25, 2011 Revised on August 26, 2011 H ��{,� 111 113A �@Cr1 LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 2 - I HEPW0WrH•PAWLAKGZQTECHN1 rs LEGEND: VIA NA FILL; sandy silt and clay with gravel and organics, moist, frim , black. ® TOPSOIL; organic, silty sand with gravels, loose, moist, dark brown. o� SAND AND GRAVEL (SM -GM); silty, cobbles, possible boulders, medium dense, moist to wet with depth, brown, sub - angular rocks. SAND (SM); silty, gravelly, medium dense, wet, brown. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D -1586. 16/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 16 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the SPT sampler 12 inches. 0,35 Free water level in boring and number of days following drilling measurement was taken. Depth at which boring had caved following drilling. o� o Indicates 1 2 - inch diameter hand - slotted PVC pipe in Boring 1 and 2 -inch diameter commercial slotted PVC pipe in Borings 2 and 3 installed to the depth shown. NOTES: 1. Borings 1 and 2 were drilled on May 24, 2011 with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. Boring 2 was redrilled and Boring 3 was drilled on July 21, 2011 with 6 -inch diameter hollow stem continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by instrument level and refer to the bench mark shown on Figure 1. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. Water level readings shown on the logs were made at the time and under the conditions indicated. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time, 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( %) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 111 113A I I LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 HE PWORT14- PAWLeu C.cnrr.- .,.n.... GL&A Mr. Steve Pawlak, P.L. Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 CirAI SER lit TeJAN 4N& ASSOCja1FPLs Hydrogeological and htivironmental C'onsultants Re: Preliminary Estimate of Construction Dewatering Inflow Mery Lapin Residence 232 West Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado Dear Mr. Pawlak: August 23, 2011 Ganser Lujan & Associates, LLC (GL &A) has developed a preliminary estimate of construction dewatering inflow for the proposed construction at the above referenced location. GL &A previously performed hydraulic conductivity testing of two ground water monitoring wells located at the site; the results of which were reported in our letter to you dated August 12, 2011. The preliminary estimate is based on the limited data collected from the hydraulic conductivity testing, the estimated size of the construction excavation, and the assumed drawdown required for construction. The results of hydraulic conductivity testing indicate that the subsurface materials tested have a hydraulic conductivity of up to 10 tt/day. The size of the excavation (1,260 linear teet) was based on a scaled site drawing provided by Hepworth- Pawlak Geotechnical (FI -P). 11 -P also provided the estimate of a 3 -foot drawdown of the static groundwater level to facilitate construction. Based on these parameters and using the Darcy Flow Equation we estimate that construction dewatering inflow is approximately 70 gallons per minute (gpm) and more likely on the order of 100 gpm. Please note that this preliminary estimate is based on very limited data as described in our previous report. This estimate should be further refined by additional hydraulic conductivity (slug) testing at the site or a pump test should be performed. Slug testing only evaluates a very limited extent of the aquifer and may not represent the overall aquifer characteristics. For example, a high permeability alluvial channel may easily be missed by a slug test. A pump test evaluates a much larger area of the aquifer providing a higher level of certainty than slug tests. We recommend that a pump test be performed if you elect to proceed with construction dewatering of the proposed residence. A pump test would reduce the uncertainty inherent in these preliminary estimates. If you require any additional information or have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me Sincerely, Ganser Luian & Associates Donald R. Ganser, P.G. Principal Hydrogeologist 12610 W. Bayaud Ave., Unit 11, Lakewood, CO 80228 303 - 888 -9078 *%W GANSER LUJAN & ASSO(_'IA'1`L:S GE&A Hydrot;eoloaical and Environmental Consultants Mr. Steve Pawlak, P.E. August 12, 2011 l lepworth- t'awlak Geotechnical. Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Re: Hydraulic Conductivity Testing Mery Lapin Residence 232 West Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado Dear Mr. Pawlak: Ganser Lujan & Associates, LLC (GL &A) has completed hydraulic conductivity testing of two ground water monitoring wells located at 232 West Meadow Drive in Vail, Colorado. The objective of the work was to evaluate the hydraulic conductivity of the subsurface material in the immediate vicinity of the residence. Borcholes drilled by Hepworth- Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. (H -P) indicate that the site is underlain by medium dense silty sand and gravel with cobbles to at least 20 feet below grade with ground water levels ranging from approximately 4.2 to 8.2 feel below grade. Site Data Collection The in -situ hydraulic conductivity was evaluated by performing "slug" tests within two temporary monitoring wells previously installed by H -P. The wells were constructed of 2 -inch diameter PVC with factory slotted screens. Data collected at the monitoring wells prior to testing are summarized below: 232 W. Meadow Drive Monitoring Well Data: 8/4/11 From top of casing From ground surface TD DI N 'I'OS BOS SU TD DTW TOS BOS M W -2 18.66 9.24 9.50 19.50 1.00 17.66 8.24 8.50 18.50 MW -3 19.50 5.85 10.15 20.15 1.65 17.85 4.20 8.53 18.53 TD = total well depth DTW — depth to water TOS = top of screen BOS = bottom of screen SU = casing stickup above ground surface GL &A conducted in -situ hydraulic conductivity tests (slug tests) in the two monitoring wells on August 4, 2011. A displacement type test using a 4 -foot long solid "slug" and pressure transducer was used. The resulting rapid rate of rise and fall in the water level as the slug was inserted and removed from the well was recorded by a pressure transducer and data logger. Data Analvsis The data collected was analyzed in accordance with the published procedures described by Bouwer and Rice using the computer program AyteSoly Pro. The output is provided in the Attachment. The resulting hydraulic conductivities for four tests performed in the two wells are summarized below: 12610 W. Bayaud Ave., Unit 11, Lakewood, CO 80228 303- 888 -9078 Monitoring Well Test Type MW -2 falling head MW-2 rising head MW -3 falling head MW -3 rising head Conclusions and Recommendations GANSER LUJAi\ Hydrogeological and F.nvirownental Consultants Hydraulic Conductivitv 0.002631 cm/sec (7.46 ft/day) 0.003605 cm/sec (10.02 ft/day) 0.0008234 cm /sec (2.33ft/day) 0.00007138 cinisec (0.202 May) The results of the hydraulic conductivity testing indicate that the hydraulic conductivity in all wells tested ranged from 7.1x10 "5 to 3.6x10 -3 cm.isec (0.202 to 10.02 feet /day). MW -3 exhibited relatively low conductivity values and an approximate order of magnitude difference in values from the falling head and rising head indicating potential well screen clogging, limited screen length, or lack of appropriate development. The hydraulic conductivity in this well is not likely representative of the conductivity of the overall alluvial aquifer. We recommend that the higher value of 3.6x10 -3cm /sec (10.02 ft/day) be used for design purposes. Only a limited section of aquifer material was tested in each well due to the limited aquifer penetration. As a result these data should be considered preliminary estimates of the overall hydraulic conductivity of the shallow aquifer. If you require any additional information or have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Ganser Wan & Associates Donald R. Ganser, P.G. Principal Hydrogeologist ATTACHMENT I - AQTESOLV OUTPUT °`. 1. co 0 0.1 CD N cd E i O Z 0.01 L 0. 60. 120. 180. 240. 300. Time (sec) MW -2 FALLING HEAD Data Set: C: \sobol \W Meadow Dr\MW- 2fh.agt Date: 08/09/11 Time: 20:47:04 Company: GL &A 1 Client: HP Geotech Location: 232 W. Meadow Dr. Test Well: MW -2 Test Date: 8/4/2011 Saturated Thickness. 10.25 ft PROJECT INFORMATION AQUIFER DATA Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 1. WELL DATA MW -2 Initial Displacement: 1.57 ft Static Water Column Helght: 10.26 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 10.26 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer -Rice K = 0.002631 cm /sec y0 = 0.2514 ft I r 0.01 L 0. 60. 120. 180. 240. 300. Time (sec) MW -2 FALLING HEAD Data Set: C: \sobol \W Meadow Dr\MW- 2fh.agt Date: 08/09/11 Time: 20:47:04 Company: GL &A 1 Client: HP Geotech Location: 232 W. Meadow Dr. Test Well: MW -2 Test Date: 8/4/2011 Saturated Thickness. 10.25 ft PROJECT INFORMATION AQUIFER DATA Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 1. WELL DATA MW -2 Initial Displacement: 1.57 ft Static Water Column Helght: 10.26 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 10.26 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer -Rice K = 0.002631 cm /sec y0 = 0.2514 ft c� m N Z A . 0.1 0.01 0 001 o ° n o ° 13 a o n ° u n 0 - o a 0. 60. 120. 180. 240. S00. Time (sec) MW -2 RISING HEAD Data Set: CAsobol\W_ Meadow Dr1MW- 2rh.aq# Date: 08/09/11 Time: 20:47:06 Company: GL&A Client: HP Geotech Location: 232 W. Meadow Dr. Test Welt: MW -2 Test Date: 8i,0011 Saturated Thickness: 10.26 ft Initial Displacement: 1.466 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 10.26 f# Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Aquifer Model: Unconfined K = 0.003605 cm/sec PROJECT INFORMATION AQUIFER DATA Anisotropy Ratio (Kz(Kr): 1. WELL DATA (MW -2) Static Water Column Height: 10.26 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Solution Method: Bouwer -Rice y0 = 0.713 ft I . ca n 0.1 N E L O Z 0.01 O O p p n p ❑ O 0. 140. 280. 420. 560_ 700. Time (sec) MW -3 FALLING HEAD Data Set: C:\sobol\W Meadow Dr1MW_- 3fh.agt Date: 08/09/11 Time: 20:47 :07 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: GL&A Client: HP Geotech Location: 232 W. Meadow Dr. Test Well: MW -3 Test Date: 8/4/2011 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 14.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 1. WELL DATA (MW -3) Initial Displacement: 2.734 ft Static Water Column Height: 14.3 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 14.3 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer -Rice K = 0.0008234 cm/sec y0 = 1.318 ft in 99 CD .0 0.1 a� N CO P 0 Z 0.01 LO °U D° °o 0 O U ° 0. 400. 800. 1.2E +3 1.6E +3 Time (sec) 2.0E +3 MW -3 RISING HEAD Data Set: C: \sobol\W Meadow Dr \MW- 3rh.agt Date: 08/09/11 Time: 20:47:03 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: GUA Client. HP Geotech Location: 232 W. Meadow Dr. Test Weil: MW -3 Test Date: 8/4/2011 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 14.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 1. WELL DATA (MW -3) Initial Displacement: 2.03 ft Static Water Column Height: 14.3 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 14.3 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer -Rice K = 7.138E -5 cm /sec y0 = 1.215 ft HHepunrth- Pa��lak ( 'euiechrlical, 11C. G4 50_0 C�,,unry Road 15=} �h Glrnwoud Springs, ( "dorado 51001 Phone: 970.0={5 -1 8 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL F-ax: 970 - 945 -8454 email hpgeoCrlhpkeorech . uun October 13, 2011 Mery Lapin 232 West Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 Job No. 11 1113A Subject: Water Level Measurements, 232 West Meadow Drive, Vail, Colorado Dear Merv: As requested by Hans Berglund, water level measurements were taken today at the subject site. The last water level measurements were taken on August 17, 2011. Boring Date Depth to WL Date Depth to WL B -1 8/17/11 7' -8" 10/13/11 8' -1" B -2 8/17/11 8' -6" 10/13/11 V -10" B -3 8/17/11 4' -8" 10/13/11 5' -0" The groundwater level has gone down about 4 inches since the last reading and down about 1 to 1 % feet from the highest measured levels in early summer. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. SLP /ksw cc: Berglund Architects — Attn: Hans Berglund C; H rtilec HFPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL „+ October 31, 2011 Mery Lapin 232 West Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 Job No. I 1 1 113A Subject: Review of Alpine Engineering Subdrain Plan, Sheet C1, Proposed Residence, 232 West Meadow Drive, Lot 7, Vail Village 2" d Filing, Vail, Colorado Gentlemen: As requested, we are providing review comments of the subdrain plan by Alpine Engineering provided to us on October 27, 2011. The primary area of concern is the basement subdrain area. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated June 29, 2011, Job No. 111 113A. The subdrain is generally split into two areas with separate outlets. The basement area will have an 8 -inch pipe outlet at 0.35% slope to daylight and the crawlspace area will have a 6 -inch pipe outlet at 1 % slope to daylight. The larger size pipe and shallower grade outlet of the basement area was used to not require a sump and pump. The garage area subdrain will connect to the basement subdrain. In general, the subdrain plan is in conformance with our recommendations. We should reevaluate the suitability of the basement level subdrain at the time of construction based on actual excavation dewatering flows. The basement level will be constructed somewhat below groundwater level based on the information obtained from our previous studies. The crawlspace grade appears to be about 2 feet above groundwater level. The subdrain design is expected to keep the groundwater level below the basement floor slab. Additional waterproof precautions should be taken such as using concrete additives and waterstops at cold joints to prevent possible water penetration through the floor slab. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, jN l-- _ PA HEPWORTH — INC. Ga O 45222 m Steven L. Pawlak, P. 77 S LP /ksw Jl Ts,'a0 oa N :O��Pao cc: Berglund Architects 0 egan Winkeller (keeganOberglundarchitects corn) Alpine Engineering — Attn: Glenn Palmer (palmer�alpinecivil.com) HADERN (W ENGINEERING • COMFORT SYSTEMSM PO 80X 8610 • AVON, CO 81620 • Telephone 970 -845 -7910 Fax 97x845 -7522 • E -mail drader @raderengineedng.com 9/15/11 Hans Berglund PO Box 2378 Edwards, CO 81632 RE: Lapin Residence Energy Calculations REI Job #: 11033.00 Hans, I have performed a REScheck for the Lapin Residence using the assumptions below based on the proposed building and our discussions. The building complies by 25% better than code using the UA Tradeoff compliance method. Assumptions made: • Ceiling - R -48 cavity, R -25 continuous • Above Grade Walls - R -20 cavity, R -13 continuous • Below Grade Walls - R -16 cavity, R -20 continuous in Slab Floor - R -20 continuous o Framed Floor - R -43 cavity o Windows and Glass Doors - 0.28 U- Factor, 0.32 SHGC o Solid and Garage Doors - 0.3 U- Factor Attached is a signed copy of the REScheck compliance documents. Please give me call if you have any questions. Thank you, Jeff Herschel, E.I.T. f2T REScheck Software Version 4.4.1 Compliance Certificate Project Title: Lapin Residence Energy Code: 2009 IECC Location: Vail, Colorado Construction Type: Single Family Glazing Area Percentage: 31% Heating Degree Days: 9248 Climate Zone: 6 Construction Site: 212 and 232 West Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Owner /Agent: Mery Lapin 232 W Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 970 - 479 -6001 mervlapin @hotmail.com Compliance: 25.6% Better Than Code Maximum UA: 1841 Your UA: 1370 The % Better or Worse Than Code index reflects how close to compliance the house is based on code trade -off rules. It DOES NOT provide an estimate of energy use or cost relative to a minimum -code home. Designer /Contractor Hans Berglund Berglund Architects 210 Edwards Village Blvd, Bldg A Suite A103 PO Box 2378 Edwards, CO 81632 970 - 926 -4301 hans @berglundarchitects.com Ceiling: Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss 4807 48.0 25.0 Above Grade Walls: Wood Frame, 16" D.C. 8780 20.0 13.0 Windows/ Glass Doors: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low -E 2686 0.280 Solid Doors: Solid 433 0.300 Below Grade Walls: Solid Concrete or Masonry 1518 16.0 20.0 Wall height: 10.0' Depth below grade: 8.0' Insulation depth: 10.0' Windows/ Glass Doors: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low -E 32 0.280 Wall To Crawler: Wood Frame 352 20.0 13.0 Wall height: 8.0' Depth below grade: 3.0' Insulation depth: 8.0' Slab Floor: Slab -On- Grade: Heated 192 20.0 Insulation depth: 4.0' Floor Over Crawler: All -Wood JoistlTruss:Over Unconditioned 2179 43.0 0.0 Space 77 181 752 130 36 I W4011 52 Compliance Statement: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the 2009 IECC requirements in REScheck Version 4.4.1 and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the REScheck Inspection Checklist. Jeffrey Herschel 9/15/11 Name - Title i n Date Project Notes: Calculation prepared by: NAME Rader Engineering Inc. Project Title: Lapin Residence Report date: 09/12111 Data filename: J:\Jobs\2011 - Jobs \11033.00 - Lapin Residence\ Mechanical \Calculations \Rescheck \11033 - Lapin Rescheck.rck Page 1 of 5 40690 Highway 6, Suite E1 PO Box 8610 Avon, CO 81620 Project Title: Lapin Residence Report date: 09/12/11 Data filename: J:\Jobs\2011 - Jobs \11033.00 - Lapin Res idence\ Mechanical \Calculations \Rescheck \11033 - Lapin Rescheck.rck Page 2 of 5 CNJ( Ceilings: REScheck Software Version 4.4.1 Inspection Checklist ❑ Ceiling: Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss, R -48.0 cavity + R -25.0 continuous insulation Comments: Above -Grade Walls: ❑ Above Grade Walls: Wood Frame, 16" o.c., R -20.0 cavity + R -13.0 continuous insulation Continuous insulation specified for this above -grade wall has consistent R -value rating across full area of the wall. Comments: Basement Walls: ❑ Below Grade Walls: Solid Concrete or Masonry, 10.0' ht / 8.0' bg / 10.0' insul, R -16.0 cavity + R -20.0 continuous insulation Comments: ❑ Wall To Crawler: Wood Frame, 8.0' ht / 3.0' bg / 8.0' insul, R -20.0 cavity + R -13.0 continuous insulation Comments: Windows: ❑ Windows/ Glass Doors: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low -E, U- factor: 0.280 For windows without labeled U- factors, describe features: #Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No Comments: ❑ Windows/ Glass Doors: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low -E, U- factor: 0.280 k� For windows without labeled U- factors, describe features: #Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No Comments: Doors: ❑ Solid Doors: Solid, U- factor: 0.300 Comments: Floors: ❑ Slab Floor: Slab -On- Grade: Heated, 4.0' insulation depth, R -20.0 continuous insulation Comments: Slab insulation extends down from the top of the slab to at least 4.0 ft. OR down to at least the bottom of the slab then horizontally for a total distance of 4.0 ft. ❑ Floor Over Crawler: All -Wood Joist/Truss : Over Unconditioned Space, R-43.0 cavity insulation Comments: Floor insulation is installed in permanent contact with the underside of the subfloor decking. Air Leakage: ❑ Joints (including rim joist junctions), attic access openings, penetrations, and all other such openings in the building envelope that are sources of air leakage are sealed with caulk, gasketed, weatherstripped or otherwise sealed with an air barrier material, suitable film or solid material. ❑ Air barrier and sealing exists on common walls between dwelling units, on exterior walls behind tubs /showers, and in openings between window /doorjambs and framing. ❑ Recessed lights in the building thermal envelope are 1) type IC rated and ASTM E283 labeled and 2) sealed with a gasket or caulk between the housing and the interior wall or ceiling covering. ❑ Access doors separating conditioned from unconditioned space are weather- stripped and insulated (without insulation compression or damage) to at least the level of insulation on the surrounding surfaces. Where loose fill insulation exists, a baffle or retainer is installed to maintain insulation application. Project Title: Lapin Residence Report date: 09/12/11 Data filename: J: \Jobs\2011 - Jobs \11033.00 - Lapin Reside nce\ Mechanical \Calcu lations\Rescheck \11033 - Lapin Rescheck.rck Page 3 of 5 ❑ Wood- burning fireplaces have gasketed doors and outdoor combustion air. Air Sealing and Insulation: F1 Building envelope air tightness and insulation installation complies by either 1) a post rough -in blower door test result of less than 7 ACH at 33.5 psf OR 2) the following items have been satisfied: (a) Air barriers and thermal barrier: Installed on outside of air - permeable insulation and breaks or joints in the air barrier are filled or �..� repaired. (b) Ceiling /attic: Air barrier in any dropped ceiling /soffit is substantially aligned with insulation and any gaps are sealed. (c) Above -grade walls: Insulation is installed in substantial contact and continuous alignment with the building envelope air barrier. (d) Floors: Air barrier is installed at any exposed edge of insulation. (e) Plumbing and wiring: Insulation is placed between outside and pipes. Batt insulation is cut to fit around wiring and plumbing, or sprayed /blown insulation extends behind piping and wiring. (f) Corners, headers, narrow framing cavities, and rim joists are insulated. (9) Shower /tub on exterior wall: Insulation exists between showers /tubs and exterior wall. Sunrooms: Sunrooms that are thermally isolated from the building envelope have a maximum fenestration U- factor of 0.50 and the maximum skylight U- factor of 0.75. New windows and doors separating the sunroom from conditioned space meet the building thermal envelope requirements. Materials Identification and Installation: F1 Materials and equipment are installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. ❑ Insulation is installed in substantial contact with the surface being insulated and in a manner that achieves the rated R- value. ❑ Materials and equipment are identified so that compliance can be determined. ❑ Manufacturer manuals for all installed heating and cooling equipment and service water heating equipment have been provided. ❑ Insulation R- values and glazing U- factors are clearly marked on the building plans or specifications. Duct Insulation: ❑ Supply ducts in attics are insulated to a minimum of R -8. All other ducts in unconditioned spaces or outside the building envelope are insulated to at least R -6. Duct Construction and Testing: ❑ Building framing cavities are not used as supply ducts. Lj All joints and seams of air ducts, air handlers, filter boxes, and building cavities used as return ducts are substantially airtight by means of tapes, mastics, liquid sealants, gasketing or other approved closure systems. Tapes, mastics, and fasteners are rated UL 181A or UL 181 B and are labeled according to the duct construction. Metal duct connections with equipment and /or fittings are mechanically fastened. Crimp joints for round metal ducts have a contact lap of at least 1 1/2 inches and are fastened with a minimum of three equally spaced sheet -metal screws. Exceptions: Joint and seams covered with spray polyurethane foam. Where a partially inaccessible duct connection exists, mechanical fasteners can be equally spaced on the exposed portion of the joint so as to prevent a hinge effect. Continuously welded and locking -type longitudinal joints and seams on ducts operating at less than 2 in. w.g. (500 Pa). Li All ducts and air handlers are located within conditioned space. Heating and Cooling Equipment Sizing: F1 Additional requirements for equipment sizing are included by an inspection for compliance with the International Residential Code. Lj For systems serving multiple dwelling units documentation has been submitted demonstrating compliance with 2009 IECC Commercial Building Mechanical and /or Service Water Heating (Sections 503 and 504). Circulating Service Hot Water Systems: Lj Circulating service hot water pipes are insulated to R -2. Circulating service hot water systems include an automatic or accessible manual switch to turn off the circulating pump when the system is not in use. Heating and Cooling Piping Insulation: F1 HVAC piping conveying fluids above 105 degrees F or chilled fluids below 55 degrees F are insulated to R -3. Swimming Pools: F-] Heated swimming pools have an on /off heater switch. Project Title: Lapin Residence Report date: 09/12/11 Data filename: J:\Jobs\2011 - Jobs \11033.00 - Lapin Res idence\ Mechanical \Calculations \Rescheck \11033 - Lapin Rescheck.rck Page 4 of 5 F1 Pool heaters operating on natural gas or LPG have an electronic pilot light. ❑ Timer switches on pool heaters and pumps are present. Exceptions: Where public health standards require continuous pump operation. Where pumps operate within solar- and /or waste - heat - recovery systems. ❑ Heated swimming pools have a cover on or at the water surface. For pools heated over 90 degrees F (32 degrees C) the cover has a minimum insulation value of R -12. Exceptions: Covers are not required when 60% of the heating energy is from site - recovered energy or solar energy source. Lighting Requirements: A minimum of 50 percent of the lamps in permanently installed lighting fixtures can be categorized as one of the following: (a) Compact fluorescent (b) T -8 or smaller diameter linear fluorescent (c) 40 lumens per watt for lamp wattage <= 15 (d) 50 lumens per watt for lamp wattage > 15 and <= 40 (e) 60 lumens per watt for lamp wattage > 40 Other Requirements: ❑ Snow- and ice - melting systems with energy supplied from the service to a building shall include automatic controls capable of shutting off the system when a) the pavement temperature is above 50 degrees F, b) no precipitation is falling, and c) the outdoor temperature is above 40 degrees F (a manual shutoff control is also permitted to satisfy requirement's'). Certificate: ❑ A permanent certificate is provided on or in the electrical distribution panel listing the predominant insulation R- values; window U- factors; type and efficiency of space- conditioning and water heating equipment. The certificate does not cover or obstruct the visibility of the circuit directory label, service disconnect label or other required labels. NOTES TO FIELD: (Building Department Use Only) Project Title: Lapin Residence Report date: 09/12/11 Data filename: J: \Jobs\2011 - Jobs \11033.00 - Lapin Res idence\Mechan ical\Calcu lations\Rescheck\1 1033 - Lapin Rescheck.rck Page 5 of 5 �(2009 IECC Energy j Efficiency Certificate j Insulation Rating R-Val Ceiling / Roof 73.00 Wall 33.00 Floor / Foundation 43.00 Ductwork (unconditioned spaces): Glass & Door Rating U-Factor SHGC Window 0.28 0.32 Door 0.30 NA Heating System: Cooling System: Water Heater: Name: Date: Comments: A•B•W•D .IIa;i I r? I,IIrII Windows & Doors, In e. U -Value Average Analysis Customer: Hans Berglund -Vail Custom Builders Project: Lapin G6i6'I M Glazing Type Product Type Location Description Quantity Width Height U -Value Total sq Feet S9 feet X U value LME 3681368 Tri le laze 01 1 95.63 48.00 0.28 31.88 8.93 Low. 368/366 Trip le laze 133 1 32.00 32.00 0.26 7.11 1485 L-E 3661366 Tri le laze 134 1 38.75 66.00 0.26 17.76 4.62 LME 366/366 Tri le laze 101 1 98.50 98.50 0.28 67.38 18487 LawE 366/366 Tri le laze 102 1 96.00 32.00 0.26 21.33 5.55 LawE 366/366 Triple glaze 102 1 96.00 64.00 0.27 42.67 11.52 LowE 366/366 Triple glaze 103 1 28.00 64.00 0.27 12.44 3.36 LowE 3661366 Triple glaze 103 1 48.00 64.00 0.24 21.13 5.12 LmE EC i81 Dual Glaze Door 104 1 70.50 95050 0.29 46.78 13.56 LowE 366/366 1!!,,,k, laze 104 1 70.50 24.00 0.23 11.75 2.70 LowE 366/366 T. k laze 109 1 108.00 48.00 0.25 36.00 9.00 LowE 1661366 Triple laze 109 1 72.00 36000 0.23 18.00 4.14 L23366/366 Tri le laze 109 1 36.00 36.00 0.26 9.00 2.34 LowE 366/366 Tri le laze 110 1 75400 24.00 0.23 12.50 2.88 LowE 3661366 Triple glaze 110 1 28.00 50.00 0.23 912 2.24 LowE 366/366 Tri le laze 111 1 64.00 66.00 0.27 29.33 7.92 L-E 366/366 Tri le laze 112 1 1 00 32.00 0.23 13.33 3.07 LowE EC i81 Dual Glaze Door Master hall 1 35.50 95.50 0.29 23.64 6.83 L-E 366/366 Tri le laze 114 1 171.00 30100 0023 35.63 8619 LowE 366/366 Tri le laze 114 1 171.00 66.00 0.23 78.38 18.03 LowE 366/366 Tri le laze 114 1 171.00 30.00 0.26 35.63 9.26 LowE 3661366 Triple glaze 116 1 141.00 23.00 0.23 22.52 5.18 LowE 3661366 Triple glaze 116 1 141.00 66.00 0.23 64.63 14.96 LowE 366/366 Triple glaze 116 1 141.00 30.00 0.26 29.38 7.64 LEl 3661366 Tri k laze 117 1 98.50 92.50 0.22 63.27 13.92 LowE 366/366 Tri k laze 118 1 42.00 54.00 0.24 15.75 3.78 LowE 3661366 Triple glam 119 1 48.00 66.00 024 22.00 5.28 LowE 3661366 Triple laze 120 1 72.00 66.00 0.27 33.00 8.91 L-E 3661366 Triple glaze 121 1 30400 30.00 0.26 6.25 1.63 LowE 1661366 Tri k laze 122 1 140.00 54.00 0.23 52.50 12.08 LowE 366/366 Tri k laze 122 1 140.00 48.00 0.22 46.67 10.27 LowE 3661366 Triple glaze 122 1 140.00 96.00 0.22 9133 20.53 LowE 3661366 laze 123 1 52.50 137.00 0.22 48.49 10.67 LowE 366/366 Tri le laze 123 1 60.00 48.00 0.22 20.00 4.40 LowE 3661366 Tri le laze 123 -66 1 52.50 37.00 0.23 11.49 3.10 LowE 366/366 Tri ie laze 124,125,126 3 30.00 20.00 0.23 12.50 2.88 LowE 366/366 Tri le laze 129 1 36.00 24.00 0.26 6.00 1.56 LowE 366/366 Tri le laze 129 1 24.00 24.00 0.23 4.00 0.92 LowE 366/366 Tri le laze 130 -131 1 86.00 24.00 0.23 14.33 3.30 L-E 3661366 Triple laze 131 -131 1 33.00 48.00 0.26 11.00 2.86 Lo*E 366/366 Tri le laze 2366/366 213 1 110400 31.00 0.22 25.21 5.55 L Td le laze 213 1 110.00 24.00 0.26 18.33 4.77 LowE 366/366 Tri le laze 214 1 36.00 36.00 0.26 9.00 2.34 Low. 366/366 Tri k laze 214 1 54.00 36.00 0.22 13.50 2.97 LowE 366/366 Tri k laze 215 1 36.00 36.00 0.23 9.00 2.07 LowE 366/166 Tri k laze 215 1 54.00 36.00 0.22 13.50 2.97 LowE 366/366 Tri k laze 216 1 36.00 36.00 0.23 9.00 2.07 LowE 366/366 Tri k laze 217 1 36.00 48.00 0.26 12.00 3.12 LowE 3661366 Triple gJaze 218 1 102.00 24.00 0.22 17.00 3.74 LowE 3661366 Tri le laze 218 1 30.00 48.00 0.26 10.00 2.60 LowE 3661366 Tri le laze 219 1 118.00 24.00 0.22 19.67 4.33 LowE 3661366 Triple laze 219 1 64.00 48.00 0.26 21.33 5.55 LowE 366/366 Tri k laze 220 1 36.00 24.00 0.22 6.00 1.32 LowE 366/366 Tri le laze 220 1 36. 00 52.00 0.27 13.00 1.51 LowE 3661366 Triple glaze 221 1 120.00 24.00 0.22 20.00 4.40 LewE Mn Tri le laze 221 1 60.00 48.00 0.22 20.00 4.40 LowE 366/366 Tri k laze 222 1 60.00 72.00 0.22 30.00 6.60 LEE 3661366 Triple glaze 223 1 39.00 66.00 037 17.88 4.83 LowE 3661366 Triple glaze 201 1 24.00 .27 11.00 2.97 L-E 3661166 Tri k laze 201 1 48.00 .24 22.00 5.28 LowE EC i81 Dual Glaze Door 202 1 132.00 .29 87.54 25.39 LowE 366/366 Tri le laze 203 1 132.00 .22 22.00 4.84 LowE 3661366 Tri le laze 203 1 72.00 0.26 24.00 6.24 LowE 3661366 Triple laze 203 1 36.00 0.26 MUMO.-2.7 13.50 3.51 Low; 266 /366 Tri k laze 204 1 144.00 0.22 24.00 5.28 LowE 366/366 Tri le laze 204 1 72.00 0.26 24.00 6.24 laze LowE 366 /366 !T2 2048 1 36.00 0.22 6.00 1.32 pie- LowE 366/366 Tri k laze 2048 1 36.00 0.26 12.00 3.12 LowE 3661366 Triple laze 204C 1 30.00 30.0 0 0.23 6.25 1.14 LowE 366/366 Tri k laze 205 1 148.00 24.00 0.22 24.67 5.13 LowE 366/366 Tri k laze 206 1 30.00 30.00 0.26 6.25 1.63 LowE 3661366 Triple glam 207 1 36.00 78400 0127 19.50 5.27 LowE 3661366 Triple laze 208 1 96.00 72.00 0.26 48.00 12.48 LowE 3661366 Triple glaze 209 1 118.00 24.00 0.22 19.67 4.33 LowE 3661366 Tri le laze 209 1 72.00 54.00 0.26 27.00 7.02 L-E 3661366 Triple laze 210 1 32.00 54.00 0.26 12.00 3.12 LZE 766/366 Tri le laze 211 212 2 30.00 30.00 0.26 12.50 3.25 LowE 366/366 Tri le laze Weiland Door 107 1 154.00 108.00 0.15 115.60 40.43 LowE 366/366 Triple laze Weiland Door 108 1 178.00 108.00 0.35 133.50 46.73 LowE 3661366 Tri k laze Weiland 1078 Transom 1 154.00 29.00 0.35 31401 10.85 LME 366/366 Tri le laze Weiland 108B Transom 1 178.00 29.00 0.35 35.85 12.55 LowE 3661366 Triple laze Weiland Direct Sets -Ent d Din 1 0.00 0.00 0.35 188.00 65.80 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 85 2370.72 W5.32 41r- CLEAR DESIGN Consulting Engineers, LLC. !l 0023 Ru9tic Terrace, P.O. Box C87;, Breckenndc�e, CO 80424, O�O0 •• •• F O •• • • Tel: 970.455.476 1, Email: dcleary. cdc@gmail. cam • • LAPIN RESIDENCE - PRIMARY UNIT 44261 LOT 7, VAIL VILLAGE FILING 2 - VAIL, CO DEMAND LOAD CALCULATIONS, SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNIT -09 �• q •: �Q 120 / 240 VOLT, -1 m 0 go O�(C ••••••••���� s PROJECT NUMBER: 1117,00 s �ONA1.� DATE: 09114111 BY: DAN L. CLEARY, P.E. ,PER NEC 220) EQUIPMENT VOLT AMPS/ NEC ARTICLE DEMAND TOTAL VAI TAG QUANTITY (W) DEMANDFACTOR FACTOR (W) GENERAL LIGHTING LOAD: GENERAL LIGHTING 8500 SF EAX 3 X 220.12 = 25500 SMALLAPPLIANCE 2 EA X 1500 X 220.52(A) = 3000 LAUNDRY 1 EA X 1500 X 220.52(B) = 1m TOTAL ( BEFORE THE APPLICATION OF NEC 220.42 DEMAND FACTORS) = 30000 1-1 3kVA @ 100% = 3000 REMAINDER @ 35% = 9450 NET LOAD, DWELLING = 12450 CONNECTED DEMAND OWNER EQUIPMENT & APPLIANCES: LOAD LOAD WALL OVEN 1 EA X 5100 X 220.55 5100 100 °A = 5100 GAS COOKTOP (ESTIMATED LOAD) 1 EA X 1800 X 1800 100% = 1800 HOOD VENT (ESTIMATED LOAD) 1 EA X 1500 X 220.53 1500 75% = 1125 HOOD VENT BLOWER -900 CFM 1 EAX 685 X 220.53 685 75% = 514 MICROWAVE 1 EA X 1600 X 220.53 1600 75% = 1200 GARAGE FRIDGE/FREEZER 1 EA X 1200 X 220.53 1200 75% = 900 WARMING DRAWER 1 EAX 850 X 220.53 850 75% = 638 FRIDGE 1 EAX 1200 X 220.53 1200 75% = 900 UC FRIDGE 3 EAX 1200 X 220.53 3600 75% = 2700 D4SK,NASHER (ESTfMATED LOAD1 2 EA X 1200 Y, 220.53 2400 75% = 1606 UC WINE STORAGE FRIDGE 1 EA X 1200 X 220.53 1200 75% = 900 DISPOSAL 1 EA X 975 X 220.53 975 75% = 731 DRYER (ELEC) 1 EA X 5000 X 220.54 5000 100-A = 5000 AA/ RACK EQUIPMENT (ESTIMATED LOAD) 1 EA X 1200 X 1200 100% = 1200 MISC OFFICE EQUIPMENT (ESTIMATED LOAD) 1 EA X 2400 X 2400 100% = 2400 GARAGE DOORS (ESTIMATED LOAD) 2 EA X 800 X 220.53 1600 75% = 1200 TOTAL 28108 ANTICIPATED HVAC I MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT; BOILERS (ESTIMATED LOAD) 2 EA X 600 X 1200 100% = 1200 1/6 HP PUMPS 6 EA X 528 X 3168 1000h = 3168 1 -12 HP PUMPS 1 EA X 2400 X 2400 100% = 2400 N4 Hp WSIO PS 2 EA X 1656 X 3312 100% = 3312 12 Hp PUMPS 1 EA X 1176 X 1176 100% = 1176 125 Hp PUMPS 1 EA X 80 X 80 100% = 80 PUMP P -6 1 EA X 25 X 25 1000 = 25 MECH CONTROLS & DAMPERS (ESTIMATED) 1 EA X 450 X 450 1000A = 450 FAN COIL 12 Hp FC -1 1 EA X 1200 X 1200 100% = 1200 FAN COIL 113 Hp FC -2 1 EA X 875 X 875 100-A = 875 ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATOR ERV -1 1 EA X 157 X 157 1000A = 157 HUMIDIFIERS H-1 1 EA X 1900 X 220.53 1900 75% = 1425 EXHAUSTFANS EF -1 8 EA X 18 X 144 1000h = 144 EXHAUSTFANS EF -2 1 EA X 115 X 115 100% = 115 EXHAUSTFANS EF -4 1 EA X 26 X 26 100% = 26 EXHAUSTFANS EF -5 1 EA X 79 X 79 100% = 79 EXHAUST FANS EF -6 1 EA X 94 X 94 100% = 94 LIFTSTATION LS-1 1 EA X 3000 X 3000 100% = 3000 TOTAL = 18926 ADDITIONAL ELECTRIC UTILIZATION EQUIPMENT: HEAT TAPE (BOD — RAYCHEM GM -2XT). (EST. LENGTH) 400 L,FrEa.F 12 X 426.4 4800 125% = 6000 STEAMSHOW'ERrESTYMATED LOAD) SG -1 i EAX 10000 X 10000 75% = 7500 JACUZZI TUB (ESTIMATED LOAD) 1 EA X 1800 X 1800 75% = 1350 HOT TUB (ESTIMATED LOAD) 1 EA X 12000 X 12000 100% = 12000 EXERCISE BIKE (ESTIMATED LOAD) 1 EA X 1200 X 1200 100% = 1200 ELLIPTICAL (ESTIMATED LOAD) 1 EA X 1200 X 1200 100% = 1200 TREADMILL (ESTIMATED LOAD) 1 EA X 1200 X 1200 100% = 1204 TOTAL 30459 NET COMPUTED LOAD TOTAL 91261 VA 89934 VA FOR 240V, 10, 3 WIRE SERVICE 89934 IVA) I 240 VOLTS 380 AMPS 375 AMPS NETCOMPUTED LOAD ALLOWING 20% ADDITIONAL CAPACITY TOTAL 100387 VA 107920 VA ALLOWING FOR 20% ADDITIONAL CAPACITY FOR UNFORSEEN LOADS AND FUTURE UPGADE5 460 AMPS NOTES: — - -- - - -- — - -— 1. THESE CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE STANDARD CALCULATION METHOD (NEC 220). 2. WE HAVE APPLIED NEC 220.53 APPLIANCE LOAD DEMAND FACTOR. 75% FOR (4) OR MORE APPLIANCES, NOT INCLUDING HEAT. AC, RANGE OR DRYER. 3. CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. 4. CDC ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDS THAT THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR REVIEW AND COMPARE THE FINAL /ACTUAL LOADS TO THOSE USED FOR THIS CALCULATION PRIOR TO SERVICE ROUGH IN • 'AwCLEAR DESIGN Con5ulting Englneer5, LLC. 0023 RU5tic Terrace, P.O. Box 6871 , Breckenndge, CO 80424, Tel: 970.455.4781 , Email: dcleary.cdc @gmail.com LAPIN RESIDENCE - SECONDARY UNIT LOT 7, VAIL VILLAGE FILING 2 - VAIL, CO DEMAND LOAD CALCULATIONS, SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNIT 1201 240 VOLT, - 10 PROJECT NUMBER: 1117.00 DATE: 09/14/11 BY: DAN L. CLEARY, P.E. (PER NEC 220) EQUIPMENT QUANTITY VOLT AMPS/ NEC ARTICLE DENIAND TOTAL VA/ TAG (w) DEMAND FACTOR FACTOR (W) GENERAL LIGHTING LOAD: 8000 X 220.55 5100 GENERAL LIGHTING 1500 SF EA X 3 X 220.12 = 4500 SMALL APPLIANCE 2 EA X 1500 X 220.52(A) = 3000 LAUNDRY 1 EA X 1500 X 220.52(8) 1200 TOTAL ( BEFORE THE APPLICATION OF NEC 220.42 DEMAND FACTORS) 1200 = 9000 1" 3kVA C' 100 % EA X - 3000 REMAINDER P-� 75% = 900 DISPOSAL 1 NET LOAD, DWELLING 975 = 5100 75% = 731 CONNECTED DEMAND OWNER EQUIPMENT & APPLIANCES: LOAD LOAD RANGE 1 EA X 8000 X 220.55 5100 100% = 8000 HOOD / MICROWAVE 1 EA X 1600 X 220.53 1600 75% = 1200 FRIDGE 1 EAX 1200 X 220.53 1200 75% = 900 DISHWASHER (ESTIMATED LOAD) 1 EA X 1200 X 220.53 1200 75% = 900 DISPOSAL 1 EA X 975 X 220.53 975 75% = 731 DRYER(ELEC) 1 EA X 5000 X 220.54 5000 100% = 5000 GARAGE DOORS (ESTIMATED LOAD) 2 EA X 800 X 220.53 1600 75% = 1200 TOTAL = 17931 ANTICIPATED HVAC / MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: BOILER (ESTIMATED LOAD) 1 EA X 600 X 600 100% = 600 1/25 Hp PUMPS 3 EA X 80 X 240 100% = 240 PUMP P -10 1 EA X 25 X 25 100% = 25 MECH CONTROLS 8 DAMPERS (ESTIMATED) 1 EA X 450 X 450 100% = 450 EXHAUST FANS EF -1 4 EA X 18 X 72 100% = 72 EXHAUST FANS EF -3 1 EA X 90 X 90 100% = 90 TOTAL 1477 ADDITIONAL ELECTRIC UTILIZATION EQUIPMENT: HEAT TAPE (BOD - RAYCHEM GM -2XT), (EST. LENGTH) 100 L PNT AR 12 X 426.4 1200 125% = 1500 TOTAL 1500 NET COMPUTED LOAD TOTAL 19352 VA 26008 VA FOR 240V, 10, 3 WIRE SERVICE 26008 (VA) f 240 VOLTS 81 AMPS 108 AMPS NET COMPUTED LOAD ALLOWING 20% ADDITIONAL CAPACITY TOTAL 21287 VA 31210 VA ALLOWING FOR 20% ADDITIONAL CAPACITY FOR UNFORSEEN LOADS AND FUTURE UPGADES 130 AMPS NOTES: 1. THESE CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE STANDARD CALCULATION METHOD (NEC 220). 2 WE HAVE APPLIED NEC 220.53 APPLIANCE LOAD DEMAND FACTOR. 75% FOR (4) OR MORE APPLIANCES, NOT INCLUDING HEAT, AC, RANGE OR DRYER. 3. CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. 4, CDC ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDS THAT THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR REVIEW AND COMPARE THE FINAL / ACTUAL LOADS TO THOSE USED FOR THIS CALCULATION PRIOR TO SERVICE ROUGH IN. STATE OF COLORADO ASBESTOS CERTIFICATION* Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division This certifies that . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mark Symmank • '� Certification No: 10571 has met the requirements of 25-7-507, C.R.S. and Air Quality Control Commission Regulation No. 8, Part B, and is hereby certified by the state of Colorado in the following discipline: M Building Inspector* Issued: 11/4/2010 Expires on: 11/4/2011 , 7- Au orized ntativ APCD Represe This certificate is twlid only with the possession of current Division-approved training course certification in the discipline specified above. • I o a w Af A � � n � O vo vo o czm CG 50 2 N a m �o 0 1 o C) A ' a a. b a A a tz EL= o r C7 <p�o CL O �zvAi C i o •° c °� 0: o bo fD � `rs > O CD w CA A 0 b a a x -c z x CrJ c S �y orr wrr tA 4 A A D N c A K O o� �+ o J � a � r O N w �1 O r l � M�1 l 1 2/7/12 asbestos repot from Chris Maron 5- 11- 11.htm From: Ted Leach [ted @vailcustomcom] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 11:52 AM To: mery lapin Cc: Hans Berglund; Benno Scheiddeger; Lainey Coffey Subject: FW: 232 West Meadow Drive, Vail, Colorado Attachments: Mark _BI_9- 1- 11.pdf, 232—West Meadow- Vail_labs.pdf, 5-9-11_232_West_Meadow_Dr_- _Vail- _demo- CM.pdf image001 ti Ted Leach 970.926.8771 970.926.8253 (fax) www.VailCustom.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- 0429 Edwards Access Rd. • Northstar Center A207 • PO Box 2809 • Edwards, CO 81632 This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended solely for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information protected by law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system and destroy all copies. Disclosing, copying, distributing information included in this message, or taking action based on this message by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. We appreciate your cooperation. Unless stated to the contrary, any opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the official view of the company. From: Chris Maron [ma i Ito: cmaron3000 @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 11:44 AM To: Ted Leach Subject: Fwd: 232 West Meadow Drive, Vail, Colorado Boulder Environmental Management, Inc. Chris Maron 2400 Broadway St., Unit B Phone: 303 - 382 -1175 Fax: 1 866 - 6991121 Email: Chris _BoulderEnvironmental.com Web: www.BoulderEnvironmental.com — Original Message — From: CMaron3000 @aol.com To: merviapin @hotmail.com Sent: Tue, May 10, 2011 3:56 pm Subject: 232 West Meadow Drive, Vail, Colorado No asbestos abatement is required prior to conventional, complete building demolition. Please see section regarding obtaining a demolition permit. C: /Users / ... /asbestos repot from Chris Maron 5- 11- 11.htm 1/2 2/7/12 asbestos repot from Chris Maron 5- 11- 11.htm The results of this survey pertain only to materials tested. The laboratory reports supporting these findings above are attached. Please contact Boulder Environmental Management, Inc. or visit www.BoulderEnvironmentalcom if you have any questions or concerns regarding this report. Sincerely, Chris Maron Boulder Environmental Management, Inc. 2400 Broadway St., Unit B Boulder, CO 80304 Phone: (303) 382 -1175 Fax: (866) 699 -4121 Email: Chris (cbBoulderEnvironmental.com www.BoulderEn%Aronmental.com C: /Users / ... /asbestos repot from Chris Maron 5- 11- 11.htm 2/2 MAY -10 -2011 09:59A FROM:STROM ENV. 1(303)487 -4534 70:18666994121 P.3/0 Boulder Environmental Management, Inc., 5 Deer Trail Road, Boulder, CO 80302, Phone: (303) 449 -1 175, Fax: 1 (866) 699 -4121, Email: Cmuma3OOO@aol.com BULK SAMPLE LOG _LOCATION: 2-";Z W . MgdCjp a) `j )P . city �/1� t V- DATE: 5—CHI -� COMPANY BILLING INFO: Mobilc � n—� h NAME� -y0Mo- q7h -'w/ P - -- ►ner ✓1a�P \t� ®L�ofirtatT,rptrt ss .�i Fax Email SCOPE: 91 Complete building demolition ❑ Renovation/restoration 0 Sample per client's direction (�LAHERA Protocol followed - Minimum 3 samples, 5 samples for surfacing materials 1,000s.f.- 5,000s.f., 7 samples if >5,000s.f CONSTRUCTION ERA: SAMPLE ID 1026/ MATERIAL SAMPLED BUILDING/LOCATION QUANTITY 5:-1-wt.5- 0 - �.. 91LN - ti- Z - A) !aPeA,4 94m Z ¢+� - w Sl j A90 Is t: je B tape 0 Duct concealid in ceilings or concealed in walls to, _u..pper floor []Boiler insulation (D Pipe insulation on radiant / domestic water 0 Flue 0 Breeching cement {. I Transite siding 0 Transite roof ACCESSSED: 0 Crawl space ® Basement 0 Attic 0 Roof JRChecked under carpeting, layered flooring, and overlays GLDpe of heating system(s) JZLSteam, 0 Forced air, [I Electric baseboard, 0 Radiant stove PALM IF AREA($) INASMSSiBLE is INSTRUCTIONS: STOP ON F T rK TURNAROUND: WWa'� SAMPLES COLLECTED BY: (Mark Syttunattk) DATE: — / TIME: • DATE: SAMPLES RECEIVED BY: SID II TIME: MAY -10 -2011 10:00A FROM:STROM ENV, 1(303)487 -4534 TO :18666994121 P.4/8 Boulder Environmental Management, Inc., 5 Deer Trail Road, Boulder, CO 80302, Phone: (303) 449 -1175, Fax: 1 (866) 699 -4121, Email: Cmaron3000®aol.com BULK SAMPLE LOG LOCATION: rL3 ? ��_ / C-% c, e j/A j� DATE: ; =' -�/ COMPANY BILLING INFO: Address COY Zi NAME: Mile _ y Mobile Fax Email SCOPE: 0 Complete building demolition 0 Renovation/restoration 0 Sample per client's direction 0 AHERA Protocol followed - Minimum 3 samples, 5 samples for surfacing materials I,000s.f.- 5,000s.f., 7 samples if>5,000s.f CANVI I►C'TInN FQ .L• SAMPLE ID MATERIAL SAMPLED BUILDING/LOCATION QUANTITY �t cJ ! /& 0 Boots 0 Seam tape 0 Duct concealed in ceilings or concealed in walls to u per floor Boiler insulation 0 Pipe insulation on radiant / domestic water ❑ Flue CD Breeching cement U Transite siding 0 Transite roof ACCESSSED: 0 Crawl space 0 Basement ❑ Attic 0 Roof 0 Checked under carpeting. layered flooring, and overlays 0 Type of heating system(s) 0 Steam, 0 Forced air, 0 Electric baseboard, 0 Radiant stove PACM AREA(s) INASSESSIBLE INSTRUCTIONS: STOP ON FIRST POSITIVE TURNAROUND: SAMPLES COLLECTED BY: (Mark Symmank) DATE: TIME: P SAMPLES RECEIVED BY: DATE: TIME: • U • MAY -10 -2011 09:58A FROM:STROM ENV. 1(303)487 -4534 70:18666994121 P.I /e Strom Environmental, Inc. Environmental Testing Services 6925 N. Broadway, Denvcr, CO. 80221 Phone (303)187 -4533 Fax (303)487 -4534 v BULK ASBESTOS SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT NISTmLAP LAB 9$200450 -0 CLIENT: BOULDER ENVIRONMENTAL. INC. SEI PROJECT #: 0511 -16 % ASI ESTOS 5 DEER TRAIL ROAD DATE OF RECEIPT: 05 -09-11 509NIS-OIA -A BOULDER, CO 80302 DATE OF ANALYSIS: 05 -10-11 CLIENT PROJECT #: 100 %AGGREGATE SAMPLED BY: CLIENT PROJECI' NAME: 232 W. MEADOW DR., VAIL, CO PAGE #: 10172 ABBREVIATIONS: SAMPLE TYPE ASBESTOS TYPE MATERIAL TYPE 110262A VT -Vinyl Floor Tile CHRY'S- Chrysotile CELL - Cellulose GOOD FS -Floor Sheeting AMOS- Amosite FG- Fibrous Glass DR VIVA LUDJM- WHI'IE, GRAN AC- AcoustieRl Spray -On CROC- Crocldolite AGG- Aggregate NO CT- Ceiling Tile TREM- Tremolite NF -Non Fibrous NAD DJM- Drywall Joint Mud ANTH- Anthophyllite BIN- Binder 5091NIS -03A.R WP -Wall Plaster NAD -No Asbestos Detected SYN Cvnlhelic 20%CELL +AGG GRAN - Granular TRACE-<I% .Asbestos HH -Horse Hair CLIENT N SEI LAB N SAMPLE DESCRIPTION % ASI ESTOS OTHER MATERIALS Sample Condition bowage.tom 509NIS-OIA -A 110261A TEXTURE COAT - WHITE, GRAN NAD 100 %AGGREGATE GOOD NO 509M.S41A -8 1102618 DRYWALUDJM- WHITE, GRAN NAD 20a/oCELI. +AGG GOOD NO 509MS82A -A 110262A rExT1JRECOAT- WHITE, GRAN NAD 100%AGGREGATE GOOD NO 5O9MS4)2A -B 110262B DR VIVA LUDJM- WHI'IE, GRAN NAD 20 %CELL +AGG GOOD NO 509MS-03A -A 110263A TEXTURE COAT - BEIGE, GRAN NAD 100%ACGREGATE GOOD NO 5091NIS -03A.R 1102638 DRYWALLlDJM- WHITE. GRAN NAD 20%CELL +AGG GOOD NO 509)15-04A 110264 TEXTURE COAT - WHITE. GRAN NAD 100%AGGREGATE GOOD NO 509M,"5A 110265 TEXTURE COAT - WHITE, GRAN NAD 100 %ACGREGATE GOOD NO 509.MS4)6B 110266 ACA III I F:, POROUS NAD 100%AGGREGATE GOOD YES S09M5-076 110267 ACA1, H ITE, POROUS NAD HIMAGGREGATE GOOD YES 509M5 -08B 110168 AC- %HITE, POROUS NAD 100 %AGGREGATE GOOD YES 509NIS -09C 110269 EXT. STUCCO -TAN, GRAN NAD 100 %AGGREGATE GOOD YES 509NIS -I0C 110270 EXT. STUCCO -TAN, GRAN NAD I80%AGGRF.CATF GOOD YES 509815 -1IC 1 10271 EXT. STUCCO -TAN, GRAN NAD 100%AGGREGATE GOOD YES 509NIS -12C 110272 EXT. STUCCO -TAN, GRAN NAD 100 %AGGREGATE GOOD YES 509MS -13C 110273 EXT. STUCCO -TAN, GRAN NAD 100 %AGGREGATE GOOD YES 30911S -14D -A 110274A TEXTURE COAT - WHITE. GRAN NAD 100 %AGGREGATE GOOD NO 509515 -14D -H 11112748 DRYWALL/DJM- WHITE, GRAN NAD 15 %CELL: +AGG GOOD NO 509MIS -15D.A 1102751% TEXTURE COAT - WHITE, GRAN NAD 100 %AGGREGATE GOOD NO 509MS -ISD -H 1102758 DRYWALL/DJNI- WHITE, GRAN NAD I5 %CELL +AGG GOOD NO 509MS -16D -A 110276A TEXTURE COAT -WHITE, GRAN NAD 100 %AGGREGATE GOOD NO 509NIS -160 -11 1102 ?6H DRYWALL/D.IM- WHITF, (RAN NAD 20 %(ELI- +AGG GOOD NO -fh,, report pertain+ only to the Items tested Th.. report may not he reprntuctd except In full ohh permiumn of SEI. Ihis "port cannot be used by the dims to claim product rad,,ntmeat by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. t too r' rite samples may yield "False Negative" ( <1 %) abestoa due to the size of ubesics 6btra. UrOmnt! resuln can be obtained by TEM u, SEM analysis. St I -- rono —ol. re- analysis by paint enuM(far man accurate quantification) or TEM Analysieffer enhanced detection) for materisis regulated by EPA NF -SNAPS and containing Itu than tan percent( <10 %) •sbas tas by Potarced I.Ight(PLM). Both service are available for an additional lee. r 1 �J OD N n: N r, �r m ao 0 v v r- m v eN v lz r Z Z i Nt M kn n 00 0 w 00 0 u c 0 s �i wd N 1-4 �� O O 7 C O� w . r� •+3v Om N My N tL jj��yy Q' �O � •O � of m • h O O N w a o. W w< v� a U Z F � Z !� �> Oo a3 zQ W < ww 0 a N m W Z W O V a IL;l; a g� 3 0 a d W S LO 3 y n � � a O i � E- x o •• =w� �C< L le ce C �i 0 a Q u a b • • G( HP tech HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL May 21, 2012 Vail Custom Builders Attn: Benno Scheidegger P.O. Box 2809 Edwards, Colorado 81632 (bermo@vailcustom. co m) ,020 t vnuc F1, .I,I I D IF FoyF MAY 2 2 2012 TOWN OF VAIL Job No. 111 113B Subject: Observation of Partial Excavation, Proposed Lapin Residence, 232 West Meadow Drive, Lot 7, Vail Village 2nd Filing, Vail, Colorado Gentlemen: As requested, a representative of Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the completed basement area excavation at the subject site on May 14, 2012 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated June 29, 2011, Job No. 111 113A. The proposed residence is similar to that described in our previous report. Spread footings placed on the natural granular soils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 were used for the building support. A subdrain system designed by Alpine Engineering is being installed to prevent water level rise below the building. Visits to the site were made several times beginning April 12, 2012 to observe the excavation progress. At the time of our May 14 site visit, the foundation excavation for the basement area between Grid Lines 1 to 11 and A through K had been cut in one level up to 8 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation mainly consisted of natural, silty sand and gravel with cobbles. Localized sofa: areas had been excavated and replaced with screened rock and the subdrain system had been installed. The groundwater seepage had been controlled by the subdrain in the excavation and the soils were moist. The natural granular soils exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous subsurface exploration at the 1`;ukcr 10')- X41 -711k) • Col,,r,idti 719 - 611 -5502 1)- 10- 461- ,..11)S1-) Vail Custom Builders May 21, 2012 Page 2 site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation movement and groundwater seepage impacts. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office Sincerely, HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. •4 Te Steven L. Pawlak, P. 5 2 2 2 , � t `* , oslzi�:� SLP/ksw �l•F�StppAL Fi►.;•QO qTE OF COt��P cc: Berglund Architects — egan Winkler ( keegan(a)berglundarchitects.com) Alpine Engineering — Attn: Glenn Palmer (pahnergalpinecivil.com) Job No. 111 113B G; tech #6 D WLS X I-,t 0 0 12" O.C. DUE TO MISALIGNMENT OF FOOTING EDGE,—/ WALL OVERHANG RANGES FROM 5Y2" AT GRID E OUTSIDE THE FRONT ENTRY TO 1" AT GRID 10 AT THE CORNER OF THE GARAGE. NO ADDITIONAL SUPPORT IS NEEDED AT THE FOOTING, BUT THE FLOOR FRAMING, INCLUDING BLOCKING AND PLYWOOD SHEATHING, MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE BACKFILLING AGAINST THIS WALL. REVISED 06/01/2012 (2) - #5's CONT. HORIZ. TOP & BOT. 6" CONC. SLAB PER PLAN 24' -8% T.O. SLAB (2) - #5's CONT. LONGIT. SCALE: -Y4" = 1' -0" D rr+ F c mco p0 0 00 4�1 X ic rnL o � ►vv n (D 0 `Q (A C (D r D2 > � D �• -i -40 A cD c0 a Z -F� cD a . I ca (D L4 (n v � 1 m D m D m F' x mq 6 r c m W o a W (n u E II a I� o - c c I c o (n rn � 0 �i N 1 flirl Community Development Department 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado USA 81657 TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY This certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of Title 10, Section 10 -1 -2, ADOPTED CODES of the Vail Town Code certifying that, at the time of issuance, this structure was found to be substantially in compliance with the various ordinances of the town regulating building construction or use for the following except for items listed under conditions: Name and description of project Lein Residence NDUP Address of project: 232 West Meadow Drive Vail Colorado 81657 Owner name and address: Mery Lapin 232 West Meadow Drive Vail Colorado 81657 IBC Edition: 2012 IRC Occupancy Group(s): R3 /U Type(s) of Construction: VB Permit Number(s) B12 -0023 Occupant Load: Expiration Date: 07/31/2014 Mall Mallti Hreberlejkuilding Official SEE ATT ACHED CONDITIONS. Sprinkler System Y/N Type: Y 02/06/14 Date The following items need to be completed for issuance of CO: 1. Per letter from contractor. Items to be completed: All landscaping and exterior painting. 2. Concrete pan at driveway per TOV Public Works standards. TCO good till 07/31/2014 February 5th, 2014 Town of Vail Community Development Reference: Permit # B12 -0023 To Whom It May Concern, The Lapin residence will be completed by July 31, 2014. This will include all the landscaping and miscellaneous painting of electrical j- boxes, gas meters, electrical disconnects, vent louvers and concrete pan at driveways. Thanks, Benno Scheidegger Project Manager Vail Custom Builders NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES MWN 0�a Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Permit #: 1312 -0023 Project #: PRJ11 -0071 Job Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Applied.....: 02/14/2012 Location......: 232 WEST MEADOW DRIVE Issued...: 03108/2012 Parcel No....: 210107101004 OWNER LAPIN, MERVYN 02/14/2012 232 W MEADOW DR VAI L CO 81657 ARCHITECT BERGLUND ARCHITECTS PO BOX 2378 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: C000002069 02/14/2012 Phone: 970 - 926 -4301 APPLICANT LAPIN, MERVYN 02/14/2012 232 W MEADOW DR VAI L CO 81657 CONTRACTOR VAIL CUSTOM BUILDERS PO BOX 2809 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: 0000003221 02/14/2012 Phone: 970-331-6130 Description: new duplex home. existing house, detached 2nd unit and existing nonconforming deck to be demolished Occupancy: R -3 Type Construction: VB Valuation: $3,400,000.00 .....< .......................... .......... >....,...........,... a., ..,....,..,. FEE SUMMARY .._._._.....,....>............................ ,......._._,,.,,, ».........,. >, Building Permit ------ - - - - -> $14,368.75 Bldg Plan Check ----- - - - - -> $9,339.69 Use Tax Fee------------------ - - - - -> $67,800.00 Electrical Permit ---- - - - - -> $1,288.00 Elec Plan Check ------ - - - - -> $837.20 Restuarant Plan Review--- - - - - -> $0.00 Mechanical Permit - - - - - -> $5,620.00 Mech Plan Check ---- - - - - -> $1,405.00 Additional Fees--------------- - - - - -> $0.00 Plumbing Permit - ;- - - - - -> $2,310.00 Plmb Plan Check ---- - - - - -> $577.50 Recreation Fee--------------- - - - - -> $1,492.65 Investigation------------------ - - - - -> $0.00 Will Call ------------------------------ > $20.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES--------- - - - - -> 105,608.79 Payments ------------------------------- > 105,608.79 BALANCE DUE ------------------------ > $0.00 DECLARATIONS I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY -FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM. combination permit_012811 N OF VAfL i CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF Permit #: B12 -0023 Owner: LAPIN, MERVYN MEADOW DRIVE Cond: CON0012438 The applicant shall provide the Town of Vail construction access to the adjacent Gore Creek stream tract. The purpose of this access is to facilitate the removal of the existing bridge, removal of the existing timber wall abutments, re- grading and re- vegetation of the stream tract, the installation of stream bank stabilization, and other associated construction activities. Cond: CON0012439 A Revocable Right of Way Permit will be required prior to Project recieving a TCO or Final CO. Required work in Gore Creek for removal of Bridge and cribbing is on going. PW, Chad Salli is working on design and permitting. PW has contact General Contractor on cost estimates to do the work on behalf of the TOV. Cond: CON0012445 Radon system inspections required combination permit_012811 Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Location: 232 WEST rM i uR *VAA Permit #: B12 -0023 Owner: LAPIN, MERVYN MEADOW DRIVE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Location: 232 WEST Item: 00010 BLDG - FOOTING 05/24/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: structual slab will require SI report for concrete PSI testing 06/04/2012 By: Martin Action: AP Comments: Column footing and walls 2 thru 4 at K 07/20/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments: Plus the ufer ground 08/08/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Item: 00020 BLDG - Foundation /Steel 06/04/2012 By: Martin Action: AP Comments: Foundation walls K to 11 at EE to CC Except 10 to 11 thru E 06/04/2012 By: Martin Action: CR Comments: Walls cantileversd over footing at 10 thru 11 A thru E. Engineer to provide revised drawings before approval 06/05/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: re- insperction ok per engineer letter see notice for details 08/08/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Item: 00021 PLAN -ILC Foundation Plan 09/20/2012 By: bgibson Action: AP Item: 00110 ELEC - Service 10/30/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: temp power Item: 00120 ELEC -Rough 11/12/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: service Item: 00200 MECH -Rough Item: 00210 PLMB- Underground 05/03/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments: tested at 5 psi 08/24/2012 By: nc Action: PA Comments: 4" waste in garage slab under 5# test 09/11/2012 By: mdenney Action: AP Comments: east side - basement Item: 00220 PLMB- Rough /D.W.V. Item: 00230 PLMB- Rough/Water Item: 00240 PLMB -Gas Piping 10/25/2012 By: JRM Action: PI Comments: GAS METER SET FOR TEMP HEAT GAS LINE APPROVED 12/06/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Temp gas ok for meter set Item: 00250 PLMB -Pool /Hot Tub Item: 00260 PLMB -Misc. Item: 00310 MECH- Heating combination permit_012811 05/2312012 By: mdenney Action: PI Comments: in -floor tubing in slab. pressure tested. 09/05/2012 By: mdenney Action: PI Comments: in -floor for 2 garages. Item: 00315 PLMB -Gas Piping Item: 00320 MECH- Exhaust Hoods Item: 00330 MECH - Supply Air Item: 00340 MECH -Misc. Item: 00410 Special Inspect - progress rept 05/24/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Soils report scanned Item: 00022 PLAN -ILC FRAMING Item: 00030 BLDG - Framing Item: 00050 BLDG - Insulation Item: 00060 BLDG - Sheetrock Nail Item: 00070 BLDG -Misc. Item: 00190 ELEC -Final Item: 00290 PLMB -Final Item: 00390 MECH -Final Item: 00420 Special Inspect -final rept Item: 00533 PLAN -TEMP. C/O Item: 00530 BLDG -Temp. C/O Item: 00540 BLDG -Final C/O Item: 00542 PLAN -FINAL Item: 00090 BLDG -Final combination permit_012811 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: 8130000066 Amount: $220.00 02/04/201302:13 PM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: CG Notation: visa mervin lapin ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B12 -0023 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Parcel No: 2101- 071 - 0100 -4 2101- 071 - 0102 -9 Site Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAIL Location: 232 WEST MEADOW DRIVE Total Fees: 105,608.79 This Payment: $220.00 Total ALL Pmts: 105,608.79 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------- - - - - -- ------------------------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 220.00 T a FINAL REPORT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS 517., 00 0 Project; A. Permit Number. Project Location: -32, ro enI4 n . _ n n.0- R. 1� x 1� • 1 Owner t V d► , Address -2— City. Zip: Design Professional In Charge �..nn� (► i�fi =� Address: W& !7� %� )l 4z-U Fax: O �1 State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Q ��J � 'f �?-{• To the best of my information, knowledge, and belief the special Inspections and/or testing required for this project, have been completed in accordance with the contract documents. Interim reports submitted prior to this Final Report of Special Inspections form a basis for, and are to be considered an integral part of this final report, Any discrepancies that were noted in all interim reports have been corrected, o}. „may K� d,4 4i cp*- ea ate. �,�LISWI&J,ZIP >rc o!s do ea a &CW( ev+ X60, wW4 Pre �tX S W%p � Pared by: I” —T ® A• 3' ''�• Z 0 ' 14 �- .. 'ApailirpolklNg 11-15-13 • 11AtJ1�9 1 -12- Preparees Seal and Signature Required be-V I(- 01fl PIU-11-Do-w 01 -28 -2014 Inspection Request Reporting Page 1 4.13 pm Vail- CO - City Of A/P /D Informat Activity: Cons' Ty: Ownerpe: Architect: Applicant: Contractor: Description: Comment: Comment: Comment: Comment: Comment: Comment: Requested Inspect Date: Wednesdayy January 29 2014 Site Address: 232 W MEADOW DR VAjL 232 WEST MEADOW DRIVE ion B12 -0023 Type: COMBO LAPIN, MERVYN Occupancy: BERGLUND ARCHITECTS LAPIN, MERVYN VAIL CUSTOM BUILDERS new duplex home. existing house detached Plans received and routed to F1 Rill G, Fire P Received corrections based on OW commen RECEIVE MING ILC. ROUTED TO 1 RECEIVED THREE SETS OF REVISED PL PAGES (0 PGS TOTAL). ROUTED TO B -2 Per detail on engineer letter for foundation wE Comment: i1s1 izu1z Kecieveo en Comment: A DIA in the amount of Comment: WCAMPBELL Comment: Comment: Buildingg approved plan: REVISION 3 RECEIVE SCANNED TRANSMIT Comment: RECEIVED TWO SET; DRHOADES Comment: PAYMENT CHECK WI Comment: RECEIVED 1 THICKNESS Comment: ILC ROUTE[ Comment: RECEIVED E ROUTED TC Notice: This Darcel is is resolved. - Sub Type: NDUP Status: ISSUED Use: R -3 Insp Area: Phone: 970 - 926 -4301 Phone: 970 - 331 -6130 and existing nonconforming deck to be demolished SBELLM ied to F1, Bill G, Fire & PW - SBELLM and forwarded to JR - JMONDRAGON =N. - DRHOADES 'CANNED TRANSMITTAL FORM AND TRANSMITTAL a AND PW. - DRHOADES tractor to provide special inspection for the floor assembly e 10. See engineer letter in laserfiche for complete details. 33,567.50 was recieved'or remaining exterior work and revegitation of the site. - in F -1 - JMONDRAGON ) SHOWING THE CHANGES TO THE FRONT DOOR /SIDELIGHT SYSTEM. 'AL FORM AND ROUTED TO A -4 AND WARREN. - DRHOADES OF STAMPED PLANS SHOWING THE FOUNDATION DETAIL. ROUTED TO E -5. - 5 RETURNED TO FINANCE. WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION IS SENDING PREVIOUS PAYMENT AND REPAY THE PERMIT. PER JOE AT W ESTERN TROY THE FIRST CHECK. JOAN IN FINANCE HAS BEEN MADE AWARE OF THIS. )F REVISION PLANS SHOWING A CHANGE TO THE FOUNDATION WALL SCANNED TRANMITTAL FORM AND ROUTED TO A -4. - DRHOADES - JMONDRAGON ION CERTIFICATE FROM INSULVAIL. SCANNED TRANSMITTAL AND LETTER. IEVIEW /APPROVAL. STATUS CHANGED TO REVISION. - DRHOADES adjacent to Town -owned stream tract lands. Please confirm that no improvements or ass, or other code violations, are present on the adjacent Town -owned stream tract an aRplication for review. A permit or approval shall not be granted until the code Requested Inspection(s) Item: 533 PLAN -TEMP. C/O equ sted Time: 08:00 AM Requestor: BERGLUND ARCHITECTS V Phone: 970 - 926 -4301 Comments: 331 -6130 Assigned To: GRUTHER Entered By: JMONDRAGON K Action: Time Exp: Comment: A DIA in the amount of $33 567.50 was reciev or remaining exterior work and revegitation of the site. his approval is for the smaller secondary unit over he gar ge. Item: 53 BLDG -Temp. C/O Requested Time: 01:0 PM Requestor: BERGLUND ARCHITECTS Phone: 970 - 926 -4301 Comments: 331 -6130 Assigned To: JMONDRAGON Entered By: JMONDRAGON K Action: Time Expp• Comment: AVVHUVLU I U0 FOR SECONDARYQRIT­WST 234) HAVE TO REWORK THE CABLING ON THE GUARD RAILS. Inspection History Item: 532 PW -TEMP. C/O " Approved 11/11/13 Inspector: Is Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: Approval for Apartment Unit only. 01/27/14 Inspector: Is Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Primary Residence Item: 543 PW FINAL Item: 503 PW -Final Driveway Grade 01/27/14 Inspector: Is Action: DN DENIED Comment: Will need to install a concrete border to seperate heated brick pavers of driveway to non heated REPT131 Run Id: 14795 :�,:���r � s� � rowN o� vA�E � � Department of Community Development 75 South Fro�tage Road Vail, CO 81657 � Tei: 970-479-2128 www.vaiigov.com Development Review Coordinator TRANSl1/11TTAL FORM Revision Submittals: 1. "Field SeY' of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections will be performed untii the revisions are approved & the permit is re-issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are $55.00 per hour (2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. Permit #(s) information applies to: Attention: () Revisions -- 1 � -- � � �`'Z �p ��Tl N ( ) Response to Correction Letter <<� attached copy of correction letter � �_� ! ! _ ('1, % � ': l��! i ► _� �>+ J 1 ��.5�(�l� � ( ) eferred Submittal _ 2 U��" ' ther Project Street Address: � Z 2- 1�J ' I�.Q.0.� t,J �f t��_ (Number) (Street) (Suite #) J �� �S � Description / List of Changes: BuildinglComplex Name: Cr�- Contractor Information Business Name: U/k( (, C�Q��j� � j���''s Business Address: ��Z�1 ��-A2a�'j �c�eSs � ��tY ��J�� State: �_ Zip: D`�� � Contact Name: 1/�[R �?l/'�Q i � � l "7O 3 � � ,� ! ( � (use additional sheet if necessary) Contact Phone: w ,,,(�j� Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor 8� MateriaT � v`�-Y C�dS-Cb11/� � �C�'V►�� Is) Contact E- ail: � 1'\t�D (DO N�T include original valuation) � X P�f'�' Building: $ Owner/Owner's Representative Signature (Required) Plumbing: $ Applicant Information Applicant Name: Applicant Phone: Applicant E-Mail: For Office Use Only: Fee Paid: Received From: , Cash Check # CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # � exp. date: Electrical: Mechanical: Total: � Date Received: ' � � � � V � JUN o 12012 �,� ��a TO�JIV _�� �IAI� o�-o�t-i � CNJ( REScheck Software Version 4.4.3 Compliance Certificate Project Title: Lapin Residence Energy Code: 2009 IECC 48.0 Location: Vail, Colorado Above Grade Walls: Wood Frame, 16" o.c. Construction Type: Single Family 13.0 Building Orientation: Bldg. orientation unspecified Glazing Area Percentage: 31% Heating Degree Days: 9248 2686 Climate Zone: 6 886 Construction Site: Owner /Agent: 212 and 232 West Meadow Drive Mery Lapin Vail, CO 81657 232 W Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 433 970 -479 -6001 130 Orientation: Unspecified mervlapin @hotmail.com . • trade-off Compliance: 18.2% Better Than Code Maximum UA: 1841 Your UA: 1506 The % Better or Worse Than Code index reflects how close to compliance the house is based on code tradeoff rules. It DOES NOT provide an estimate of energy use or cost relative to a minimum-code home. r J. t. . 39 • Designer /Contractor Hans Berglund Berglund Architects 210 Edwards Village Blvd, Bldg A Suite A103 PO Box 2378 Edwards, CO 81632 970 - 926 -4301 hans@berglundarchitects.com Ceiling: Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss 4807 48.0 25.0 77 Above Grade Walls: Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 8780 20.0 13.0 181 Orientation: Unspecified Windows/ Glass Doors: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low -E 2686 0.330 886 SHGC: 0.32 Orientation: Unspecified Solid Doors: Solid 433 0.300 130 Orientation: Unspecified Below Grade Walls: Solid Concrete or Masonry 1518 16.0 20.0 36 Orientation: Unspecified Wall height: 10.0' Depth below grade: 8.0' Insulation depth: 10.0' Windows/ Glass Doors: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low -E 32 0.330 11 SHGC: 0.32 Orientation: Unspecified Wall To Crawler: Wood Frame 352 20.0 13.0 11 Orientation: Unspecified Wall height: 8.0' Depth below grade: 3.0' Insulation depth: 8.0' Slab Floor: Slab -On- Grade: Heated 192 20.0 122 Insulation depth: 4.0' Floor Over Crawler: All -Wood Joist/Truss:Over Unconditioned 2179 43.0 0.0 52 Space Compliance Statement: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the 2009 IECC requirements in REScheck Version 4.4.3 and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the REScheck Inspection Checklist. Jeff Herschel �kd � 11/9/12 Project Title: Lapin Residence Report date: 11/09/12 Data filename: J: \Jobs\2011 - Jobs \11033.00 - Lapin Residence\ Mechanical \Calculations \Rescheck \11033 - Lapin Rescheck.rck Page 1 of 5 70WR OF VAIL Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970.479.2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator TRANSMITTAL FORM Use this form when submitting additional information for planning applications or building permits. This form is also used for requesting a revision to building permits. A two hour minimum building review fee of $110 will be charged upon reissuance of the permit. ------------------------------- - - - - -- --------------- ---- -- -------- - - - - -- - - --- Application /Permit #(s) information applies to: � -(Z —oo PREII- 00*71 Project Street Address: X37— f�\e►XobI-) br ;ul� - --------- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- Attention: Revisions Response to Correction Letter \ t L!/ �� E attached copy of correction letter ? Deferred Submittal j R� V . Other -------------------------------------------- - - - - -- (Number) (Street) (Suite #) Building /Complex Name: S Applicant Information (architect, contractor, ownerriowner's rep) \l o- �kSA-t,,,rv, Contact Name: ; A/ ko t t 615, Address: �zOwo.P bS ALC_aSC, - City State: CO Zip: %657, { Contact Name: ?)QwAp '-x S 44 l �q ^ Contact Phone: 9-7p - 3-5 (' ( � J (� Contact E -Mail: xhVI() a l ( ku ,ivyv\.I CiJW\ I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- prove International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinpices ofAe Town applicable thereto. Owner /Owner's Representative Signature (Required) For Office Use Only: Fee Paid: Received From: Cash Check # CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # exp. date: Authorization # Description of Transmittal/ List of Changes, Items Attach (use additional sheet if Building Permits: Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building: Plumbing: Electrical: Mechanical: Total: Date Received: $0 Im t9 ' DEC 0 J 2012 TOWN OF VAIL Name - Title Project Notes: Calculation prepared by: Jeff Herschel Rader Engineering Inc. 40690 Highway 6, Suite E1 PO Box 8610 Avon, CO 81620 Signature Date Project Title: Lapin Residence Report date: 11/09/12 Data filename: J:\Jobs\2011 - Jobs \11033.00 - Lapin Residence \Mechanical \Calculations \Rescheck \11033 - Lapin Rescheck.rck Page 2 of 5 CNJ( Energy Code: Location: Construction Type: Building Orientation: Glazing Area Percentage Heating Degree Days: Climate Zone: REScheck Software Version 4.4.3 Inspection Checklist 2009 IECC Vail, Colorado Single Family Bldg. orientation unspecified 31% 9248 6 Ceilings: ❑ Ceiling: Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss, R48.0 cavity + R -25.0 continuous insulation Comments: Above -Grade Walls: ❑ Above Grade Walls: Wood Frame, 16" o.c., R -20.0 cavity + R -13.0 continuous insulation Continuous insulation specified for this above -grade wall has consistent R -value rating across full area of the wall. Comments: Basement Walls: ❑ Below Grade Walls: Solid Concrete or Masonry, 10.0' ht / 8.0' bg / 10.0' insul, R -16.0 cavity + R -20.0 continuous insulation Comments: ❑ Wall To Crawler: Wood Frame, 8.0' ht / 3.0' bg / 8.0' insul, R -20.0 cavity + R -13.0 continuous insulation Comments: Windows: ❑ Windows/ Glass Doors: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low -E, U- factor: 0.330 For windows without labeled U- factors, describe features: #Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No Comments: ❑ Windows/ Glass Doors: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low -E, U- factor: 0.330 For windows without labeled U- factors, describe features: #Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No Comments: Doors: ❑ Solid Doors: Solid, U- factor: 0.300 Comments: Floors: ❑ Slab Floor: Slab-On-Grade: Heated, 4.0' insulation depth, R -20.0 continuous insulation Comments: Slab insulation extends down from the top of the slab to at least 4.0 ft. OR down to at least the bottom of the slab then horizontally for a total distance of 4.0 ft. ❑ Floor Over Crawler: All -Wood Joist/Truss:Over Unconditioned Space, R-43.0 cavity insulation Comments: Floor insulation is installed in permanent contact with the underside of the subfloor decking. Air Leakage: ❑ Joints (including rim joist junctions), attic access openings, penetrations, and all other such openings in the building envelope that are sources of air leakage are sealed with caulk, gasketed, weatherstripped or otherwise sealed with an air barrier material, suitable film or solid material. Project Title: Lapin Residence Report date: 11/09/12 Data filename: J: \Jobs\2011 - Jobs \11033.00 - Lapin Residence\ Mechanical \Calculations \Rescheck \11033 - Lapin Rescheck.rck Page 3 of 5 ❑ Air barrier and sealing exists on common walls between dwelling units, on exterior walls behind tubs /showers, and in openings between window /door jambs and framing. ❑ Recessed lights in the building thermal envelope are 1) type IC rated and ASTM E283 labeled and 2) sealed with a gasket or caulk between the housing and the interior wall or ceiling covering. F-i Access doors separating conditioned from unconditioned space are weather- stripped and insulated (without insulation compression or damage) to at least the level of insulation on the surrounding surfaces. Where loose fill insulation exists, a baffle or retainer is installed to maintain insulation application. ❑ Wood - burning fireplaces have gasketed doors and outdoor combustion air. ❑ Automatic or gravity dampers are installed on all outdoor air intakes and exhausts. Air Sealing and Insulation: ❑ Building envelope air tightness and insulation installation complies by either 1) a post rough -in blower door test result of less than 7 ACH at 50 pascals OR 2) the following items have been satisfied: (a) Air barriers and thermal barrier: Installed on outside of air - permeable insulation and breaks or joints in the air barrier are filled or repaired. (b) Ceiling /attic: Air barrier in any dropped ceiling /soffit is substantially aligned with insulation and any gaps are sealed. (c) Above -grade walls: Insulation is installed in substantial contact and continuous alignment with the building envelope air barrier. (d) Floors: Air barrier is installed at any exposed edge of insulation. (e) Plumbing and wiring: Insulation is placed between outside and pipes. Batt insulation is cut to fit around wiring and plumbing, or sprayed /blown insulation extends behind piping and wiring. M Comers, headers, narrow framing cavities, and rim joists are insulated. (g) Shower /tub on exterior wall: Insulation exists between showers /tubs and exterior wall. Sunrooms: Sunrooms that are thermally isolated from the building envelope have a maximum fenestration U- factor of 0.50 and the maximum skylight U- factor of 0.75. New windows and doors separating the sunroom from conditioned space meet the building thermal envelope requirements. Materials Identification and Installation: Materials and equipment are installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. F1 Materials and equipment are identified so that compliance can be determined. ❑ Manufacturer manuals for all installed heating and cooling equipment and service water heating equipment have been provided. ❑ Insulation R- values and glazing U- factors are clearly marked on the building plans or specifications. Duct Insulation: ❑ Supply ducts in attics are insulated to a minimum of R -8. All other ducts in unconditioned spaces or outside the building envelope are insulated to at least R -6. Duct Construction and Testing: Lj Building framing cavities are not used as supply ducts. ❑ All joints and seams of air ducts, air handlers, filter boxes, and building cavities used as return ducts are substantially airtight by means of tapes, mastics, liquid sealants, gasketing or other approved closure systems. Tapes, mastics, and fasteners are rated UL 181A or UL 181 B and are labeled according to the duct construction. Metal duct connections with equipment and /or fittings are mechanically fastened. Crimp joints for round metal ducts have a contact lap of at least 1 1/2 inches and are fastened with a minimum of three equally spaced sheet -metal screws. Exceptions: Joint and seams covered with spray polyurethane foam. Where a partially inaccessible duct connection exists, mechanical fasteners can be equally spaced on the exposed portion of the joint so as to prevent a hinge effect. Continuously welded and locking -type longitudinal joints and seams on ducts operating at less than 2 in. w.g. (500 Pa). ❑ All ducts and air handlers are located within conditioned space. Temperature Controls: Where the primary heating system is a forced air - fumace, at least one programmable thermostat is installed to control the primary heating system and has set - points initialized at 70 degree F for the heating cycle and 78 degree F for the cooling cycle. Heat pumps having supplementary electric- resistance heat have controls that prevent supplemental heat operation when the compressor can meet the heating load. Heating and Cooling Equipment Sizing: Additional requirements for equipment sizing are included by an inspection for compliance with the International Residential Code. Project Title: Lapin Residence Report date: 11109/12 Data filename: J: \Jobs\2011 - Jobs \11033.00 - Lapin Residence\Mechanical \Calculations \Rescheck \11033 - Lapin Rescheck.rck Page 4 of 5 Lj For systems serving multiple dwelling units documentation has been submitted demonstrating compliance with 2009 IECC Commercial Building Mechanical and /or Service Water Heating (Sections 503 and 504). Circulating Service Hot Water Systems: Circulating service hot water pipes are insulated to R -2. Circulating service hot water systems include an automatic or accessible manual switch to turn off the circulating pump when the system is not in use. Heating and Cooling Piping Insulation: Lj HVAC piping conveying fluids above 105 degrees F or chilled fluids below 55 degrees F are insulated to R -3. Swimming Pools: Lj Heated swimming pools have an on /off heater switch. ❑ Pool heaters operating on natural gas or LPG have an electronic pilot light. Timer switches on pool heaters and pumps are present. Exceptions: Where public health standards require continuous pump operation. Where pumps operate within solar- and /or waste - heat - recovery systems. ❑ Heated swimming pools have a cover on or at the water surface. For pools heated over 90 degrees F (32 degrees C) the cover has a minimum insulation value of R -12. Exceptions: Covers are not required when 60% of the heating energy is from site - recovered energy or solar energy source. Lighting Requirements: A minimum of 50 percent of the lamps in permanently installed lighting fixtures can be categorized as one of the following: (a) Compact fluorescent (b) T -8 or smaller diameter linear fluorescent (c) 40 lumens per watt for lamp wattage — 15 (d) 50 lumens per watt for lamp wattage > 15 and — 40 (e) 60 lumens per watt for lamp wattage > 40 Other Requirements: Li Snow- and ice - melting systems with energy supplied from the service to a building shall include automatic controls capable of shutting off the system when a) the pavement temperature is above 50 degrees F, b) no precipitation is falling, and c) the outdoor temperature is above 40 degrees F (a manual shutoff control is also permitted to satisfy requirement V). Certificate: ❑ A permanent certificate is provided on or in the electrical distribution panel listing the predominant insulation R- values; window U- factors; type and efficiency of space- conditioning and water heating equipment. The certificate does not cover or obstruct the visibility of the circuit directory label, service disconnect label or other required labels. NOTES TO FIELD: (Building Department Use Only) Project Title: Lapin Residence Report date: 11/09/12 Data filename: J:\Jobs\2011 - Jobs \11033.00 - Lapin Residence\Mechanical \Calculations \Rescheck \11033 - Lapin Rescheck.rck Page 5 of 5 fz2009 IECC Energy Efficiency Certificate Ceiling / Roof 73.00 Wall 33.00 Floor / Foundation 43.00 Ductwork (unconditioned spaces): Window Door Heating System: Cooling System: Water Heater: 0.33 0.32 0.30 NA Name: Date: Comments: 11F1711 IRA E + ENGINEERING • COMFORT SYSTEMS14 PO BOX 8610 • AVON, CO 81620 • Telephone 970 -845 -7910 Fax 970 -845 -7522 • E -mail drader @raderengineedng.com 11/7/12 Mr. Brad Wright 4Pc0© t.C��s Alan- Bradley Windows & Doors. Cj�; "yAN'I' Oe• E4 162 Airpark Drive, Unit B ; Gypsum, CO 81637 Z 396 RE: Lapin Residence �„�'M REI Job #: 11033.00 c� „- AL Brad, Per your request we have completed the fenestration calculations for the Lapin Residence Crittall windows. All calculations are performed per ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009, Chapter 15 "Determination of Fenestration U- Factor ". Refer to the attached calculation sheets for detailed results. Results ❑ Crittall Windows Area Weighted Assembly U -Value = 0.44 BTU ti,..f.z of ❑ Whole House Area Weighted Assembly U -Value = 0.33 BTU hr•fi F Method: ❑ Determine the U -Value for three sections of each fenestration assembly separately. • Center of glass (UCG) • Edge of glass (UEG) • Window frame (UF) ❑ Divide fenestration assembly into appropriate sections. ❑ A weighted average, by area, window frame U -Value will be calculated if multiple frame types are present. ❑ Calculate the weighted average U -Value (UT), by area, of the four sections for each fenestration assembly. U _ UCGACG +UEGAEG +UFAF T AT Assumptions & Provided Information: ❑ All glass geometries are taken from the supplied ABW &D information received 11/5/12. ❑ The Center of Glass U- Values are provided by the manufacturer. o The Center of Glass U -Value for the Low E 366 dual glazing assembly is 0.29 BTU heft F ❑ The edge of glass is considered to be the glass within 2.5" of the frame and divider. ❑ The Edge of Glass U- Values are interpolated from data in ASHRAE Table 4, page 15.8 and corresponding center of glass information. BTU ° The Edge of Glass U -Value for the Low E 366 dual glazing assembly is 0.45 hr. f t2• °F ❑ The Frame U- Values are provided by the manufacturer. ° The Frame U -Value for the Crittall windows is 2.39 BTU hr ftz• °F Sincerely, Jeff Herschel, E.I.T. Mechanical Engineer Rader Engineering, Inc. Page 1 of 1 ASHRAE Fenestration Performance Calculations (Refer to Chpt. 15 of 2009 Fundamentals ASHRAE handbook) Job Name: Lapin Residence Job #: 11033.00 Date: 11/7/2012 Calcs By: JAH ]RADEBU ENGINEERING COMFORT SYSTEMS Assembly Overall Dimensions Center of Glass Edge of Glass Frame Assembly Panel Qty Glass Type Nom. W (in.) Nom. H (in.) Area AT (in .2) Width (in.) Height (in.) Area ArG (in.) Area AEA (in.) Width WF (in.) U -Value OF Area AF (in .2) U -Value UT Left Right Head Sill Crittall Window 1 1 Low E 366 Dual 30 115 3,486 23 108 2485 679 1.13 1 1.13 1.13 1.13 2.39 322 0.51 Crittall Window 2 1 Low E 366 Dual 71 115 8,108 63 108 6815 880 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 2.39 412 0.41 Ali Other Windows 1 — 381,456 1 -- -- -- I -- — -- -- -- - 0.33 Whole House Assembly Area (ft.2) 2,730 Area Weighted U -Value 1 0.33 Rader Engineering Inc. Disclaimer: All U- Factors were determined using the methods in the 2009 ASHRAE Handbook. These values are calculated estimates. The windows were NOT formally tested by the NFRC. �•` p a�1'I - - - - _ 3' " CUBBIES - -- - -L, O 6" , .3' - 0" 91/2' R.O { L b23 �8 \ . 1 , 16" ART W/ LASS f1 `.,. — POVVDE P ECE,„ O — 22 J -+►= I 5, 8„ WdOD LOUVERED' ! o t.�rAiR ti . 7 5/8' _.a ..��- A6.2 0 " FL OR REGISTER 4'- 3112" 5' -8" - �.._ lvluu KUUIVI / �� LAUNDRY ROOM LINE OF ENT Y ROOF ABOVE `l -1' - 3 5/8" \ 123 ........... STEEL BEAM ABOVE L6 1' 7 112 — . - w DOWNSPOUT _ EA6.,'' 2 1314" I 1-0314 4 29 a I ` L6. - - - N. __ �— 1� 31a" .0 31A ARC -R.O. NOT V.R.O- VERIFY I L.L... Z , ` ROUGH OPENING WITH °0 I G�G�N RO, \' WINDOW SCHEDULE - ,, ' I t L - BUTT JO GLAZING .1 - - - - - EE STAIR SHEET A7.5 FOR TAI � S R Ass As.z I 'j INFORMATION IXED PANEL 4 x 7 FIXED PANEL i� - - -� -- - - - - - _ 3' " 1 0' - -- - -L, '�� { 'X �8 1 , 16" ART W/ LASS f1 `.,. — P ECE,„ (2) a2X4CUSTOM� �< — I .. -+►= I 9 WdOD LOUVERED' ! o t.�rAiR ti . 7 5/8' �. ..��- A6.2 FL OR REGISTER I - �.._ " DEEP UPPER EN RE: MECH, V .. I 113 C BINETS UP TO 8' ' L . P/ As7112 - ,~, 'I rI , .. •. ! ...- _. � ♦• _ ` -• 10' 7 5/8 , 10a / 8" II ILI ART v u) m - - 4' -0'C R. p w Z o O 4 1/2" STONE THRESHOLD 2X4 FLAT BAS T CABINET W/ 1 - 1 1/2 .. 1 / C7 I �> w I O FRAMED ___ . _.__. ■�I v� W Z I v R ` II Steel windows Corporate WO Fixed Light "M� MME► C TTAI L Fixed Light (Unequal Leg Shown) OUTSIDE C�rTlnl\I a THIS SECT. SHOWN SINGLE GLAZED) G17(-TInN 1 ',-F(-'Tinf\.I CFC-'Tlnfvl GLAZING BAR (THIS SECT. SHOWN GLAZED EXTERNALLY) ) CRITTALL WINDOWS LTD. 2005 B-1 HA ER'z ++ ENGINEERING • COMFORT SYSTEMSM PO BOX 8610 • AVON, CO 81620 • Telephone 970 -845 -7910 Fax 970 -845 -7522 • E -mail drader @raderengineedng.com 7/17/12 0,,NBrad Wright �, .•• " " "'•• ABWD -Alan- Bradley Windows and Doors Inc. 162 Airpark Drive Unit B = 1/8 Gypsum, CO 81637 39 RE: Lapin Residence ��. «•��'±'� REI Job #: 11033.00 Brad, Per your request we have completed the fenestration calculations for the Lapin Residence. All calculations are performed per ASI RAE Fundamentals 2009, Chapter 15 "Determination of Fenestration U- Factor ". Refer to the attached calculation sheets for detailed results. Results: ❑ Area Weighted Assembly U -Value = 0.26 BTU heft ° F Method: ❑ Determine the U -Value for three sections of each fenestration assembly separately. • Center of glass (UCG) • Edge of glass (UEG) • Window sash (UF) ❑ Divide fenestration assembly into appropriate sections. ❑ Calculate the weighted average U -Value (UT), by area, of the four sections for each fenestration assembly. U _ UCGACG +UEGAEG +UFAF T AT Assumptions & Provided Information: ❑ All glass geometries are taken from the supplied ABWD shop drawings received 6/27/12. ❑ The Center of Glass U- Values are provided by the supplier. The Center of Glass U -Value for the Cardinal glazing assembly is 0.19 hrB tz °F o f ❑ The edge of glass is considered to be the glass within 2.5" of the sash. ❑ The Edge of Glass U- Values are interpolated from data in ASHRAE Table 4, page 15.8 and corresponding center of glass information. TU The Edge of Glass U -Value for the Cardinal glazing assembly is 0.38 B hr rz °F o f ❑ The U- Values for the various sash types are determined from ASHRAE Table 1, page 15.5. o Fixed triple glazed wood sash with insulated spacer has a U -Value of 0.35 hrB tz °F f Sincerely, Jeff Herschel Page 1 of 1 ASHRAE Fenestration Performance Calculations (Refer to Chpt. 15 of 2009 Fundamentals ASHRAE handbook) Job Name: Lapin Fenestration Calcs Job #: 11033.00 Date: 7/17/2012 Calcs By: JAH RADEIRZ ENGINEERING • COMFORT SYSTEMS04 Assembl Overall Dimensions Center of Glass Edge of Glass Sash Assembly Panel Qty Glass Type Nom. W (in.) Nom. H (in.) Area AT (in .2) Width (in.) Height (in.) Area Acs (in.) Area AEA (in.) Width WF (in.) U -Value OF Area AF (in. 2) U -Value UT Left Right Head Sill 106A 1 1 Cardinal 20 109 2,129 11 100 1057 576 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.35 497 0.28 106A 2 1 Cardinal 28 109 3,065 19 100 1915 619 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.35 531 0.26 106B 2 Cardinal 20 37 729 11 28 299 219 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.35 211 0.29 107B 1 Cardinal 154 1 30 4,543 145 21 2973 853 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1 0.35 718 0.25 108B 1 Cardinal 178 1 30 5,251 169 21 3465 973 2.00 2.00 2.00 1 2.00 1 0.35 814 0.25 ITotal Assembly Area (ft. 2) 114 Area Weighted U -Value 1 0.26 Rader Engineering Inc. Disclaimer: All U- Factors were determined using the methods in the 2009 ASHRAE Handbook. These values are calculated estimates. The windows were NOT formally tested by the NFRC. jun -LO -IL Ua :LOPM rruw- i -0," r,~tfuuY r -iva Window v6.3.36.0 Glazing System Thermal and Optical Properties 06/25 12 15:33_54 ID 1 Name WEILAND DIRECT SETS - TRIPLE GLAZE Tilt 90.0 I Glazings: 3 KEFF . 0.0199 -' Width : 11459 % 1 -112" Overall Uva ue 0.19 • - -- -_�_ 1/4" Cardinal 270 SHGCc 0.32 SCC 0.36 /�. 3/8" Airspace VtC 0.59 114" Clear RHG 75.82 3/8" Airspace 1/4" Cardinal 180 -` Layer Data for Glazing System 11 ' �- ID Name D( ") Tsol 1 Rsol 2 Tvis 1 Rvis 2 Tir 1 Emis 2 Keff Outside 2029 LoE270 -6.CIG 1 Air 5012 CLEAR_6.PPG 1 Air 2194FLoE180 -6.CIG Inside #0.236 0.375 #0.236 0.375 #0.236 .361 .302 .469 .759 .072 .053 .000 .840 .037 .578 .015 .771 .072 .073 .886 .085 .085 .000 .840 .840 .578 .016 .642 .186 .143 .857 .077 _090 .000 .068 .840 .578 Environmental Conditions: 1 NFRC 100 -2010 Tout Tin WndSpd Wnd Dir Solar Tsky Esky (F) (F) (mph) (Btu /h -ft2) (F) - T Uvalue -0 4 69.8 12 30 Windward 0.0 -0.4 1.00 ' Solar 89.6 75.2 6.26 windward 248.2 89.6 1.00 Opr-ical Properties for Glazing System '1 ' Angle 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Hemis Vtc : 0.585 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Rf : 0.157 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Rb : i 0.184 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Tsol 0.253.0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Rf : 0.335 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Rb 0:257 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Absl : 0.347 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Abs2 : 0.030 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Abs3 : 0.034 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 SHGCc: 0.317 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 .000 0.000 0.000 I Tdw -K : 0.213 Tdw -ISO: 0.404 Tuv . 0.060 Temperature Distribution (degrees F) Winter Summer Out In Our. In Layl 2..2 2.7 112 2 113.5 Lay2 31.8 32.2 108.1 107.9 Lay3 58.4 58.8 89.8 89.3 L 6' "p- 10" RO, 101/2" %4 RT NICHES SEE DETAIL 5/A6 9 1O ,0 CHINA CABINET M * � 10 3/8" 2' - 6" 7 7/8" 4'- 0 3/8" 17'- 4 5/8" N i INING ROOM 109 N m A6 1 m — — — — —Ln — — Le e- k M m - 0 1/8" I I 14 -1 / ~ V- 6 5/8" LL .{ a 06 1/8" 1 12 "' R.O 8.2 PROVIDE SCREEN DOORS 6 % 6X8 STRUT r 0 T.O. STONE DECK 33'- 6" VI " 60 X4 CUSTOM WOO 8 �- 1 �2 LOUVERED FLOOR AB.a -' A 2' -0' 11/4' 0A, 07- 91/2 "R.0 7 "• 1 Le 3 r A8.3 14'- 4 1/4" As•2 T.O. STONE @ 33' - 5" IE OF ROOF ABOVE — \� ,2 DOWNSPOUT III A4.6 \ T.O. ST E DECK - 33' - 6 i T.O. STONE @ 33. _ "8' - 7 3/8" 1 I 11' - 5 5/8" r WZAFT ,oti w ev • � � u 33, 6., i , v ti , • S i ' •}, 1, DOWN 4 EM TO �f, •` __-__ r EMAIN j IjjI \ F c�i�w�� rMdse ld Ke rnese orawmgs very seriously and make Story POIe Height NIA sure t�ey arc reviewed by all appropriate parties. By initialing this drawlthg you are stating that you uncerstand and accept the dimensions Handle Ty e: NIA Approved as dra on thl� drawing. These dimensions are the dimensions we will bulld to, Hanndle Color: N/ no matter what s documented elsewhere! It Is up to the customer to let f Resubmit with C us know what to build and this drawing is the final word in that process. Cylinder T pe: N/ Again, THESE- DIMENSIONS- SUPERSEDE - ALL - PREVIOUS ONES! — Cyl!nder_e lor: N/ —Date- NG TITLE 1111 YPE REV erior Oeva tio - O AWDS B D-IVN BY SHEL i NO. - Coe ZZ 3 ° 35 It Weiland Sliding ors and Windows. In�. 1999 to 2010 —F- n contained herein Is p oprietary to Weiland S114ing Doors aitd Windows Inc. , and or disclosed In part or Nhole, without written permission by',Weiland Sliding Doors 1818" I System Length i I� O t 1M _ 0 E Y(n I Exterior QTY 1 UNIT a 1 -106A . C � � � � � � � Sliding Doors and Windo s, Inc. SIZE ! A SCALE NTS DF E REV REVISIONS DATE A Initial Release 8/13/12 700 N� 260 L - A!a Brad B Height & Width 1014/12 cepyi 2501 Industry Street Oceanside CA 9205 Tel: (760) 722 -8828 Fax: 76ri 722 -8831 ( This d shall of awing and be repro he inform uced, cop REV -1 i) and ndows Inc. NG TITLE 1111 YPE REV erior Oeva tio - O AWDS B D-IVN BY SHEL i NO. - Coe ZZ 3 ° 35 It Weiland Sliding ors and Windows. In�. 1999 to 2010 —F- n contained herein Is p oprietary to Weiland S114ing Doors aitd Windows Inc. , and or disclosed In part or Nhole, without written permission by',Weiland Sliding Doors r,, cnuvn r,ease Ea KR tnese Drawings very seriously and make Story Pole Height N/A sure t�ey are reviewed by all appropriate parties. By Initialing this drawn g you are stating that you understand and accept the dimensions Handle Ty e: N/A on this drawing. These dimensions are the dimensions we will build :o, Handle Color: N/A no matter what 'S documented elsewhere! It is up to the customer to let us know what to build and this drawing is the final word in that process. Cylinder Type: N/ AgaintT-HESE— DIMENSIONS- SUPERSEDE -ALL— PREVIOUS -ONES1 Cylin-der-C lor: -N/ 1 1/8" yste Le gth 1/21 Shim S ace 1211 Shi Sp ! Pi) 1/811 Rough Ope ing merior Approved as drawn Resubmit with correction; r-- 00 Ln N gTM1 �Nrr 0 1 -106A SIZE SCALE DRAIVINGTrrLE ;TYPE REV REV REVISIONS ® A NTS Plan Section - O AWDS 113 DATE weila JOS NAME DRAWN BY SHEET NO. A Initial Release 8/13/12 pnd Win Sliding Doors do s, Inc 26 6 - Alan Bradley - Coffey I ZZ 4 O: 35 B Height & Width 10/4/12 Copyri ht Weiland Sliding Doors and Windows. inf 1999 to 10 2601 Industry Street �CeanSide CA 9205, Tl l awing and he if ton contained herein is p-oprietary to Welland SllllIng Doors d Windows Inc. , and shall of be repro uced, cop! Or disclosed in part or I�hole, without written p rmission b Weiland Sll Ing Doors Tel: (760) 722 -8828 Fax: (76) 722 -883 and Endows Inc. RFV - T i HLLCII IIUII -- mease ca Ke. cnese arawings very seriously and make Story Pole (Height N/A sure t�ey are reviewed by all appropriate parties. By initialing this drawing you are stating that you understand and accept the dimensions Handle Tye: N/A on this; drawing. These dirrenslons are the dimensions we will build ,0, Handle Colbr: N/ no matter what is documented elsewhere! It Is up to the customer to let us know what to build and this drawing Is the final word in that procass_ Cylinder ,r}I�j�e: N/ Again, - THESE- DIMENSIONS -- SUPERSEDE -ALL PFEVIOUS -ONES! - -- C'VHn—rier- frsr—N/ -- Q rz co E o m QTY NIT Jt 1 2 -106A F VIM& REV REVISIONS DATE A Initial Release 8/13112 weiland Sliding Doors end Windows, Inc. B Height &Width 1014/12 2601 Industry Street Oceanside CA 920: Tel: (760) 722 -8828 Fax: (76) 722 -8F 26 3/4 "I tem Length Approved as'', dravl Resubmit wikh co xterio n SIZE SCF.LF. DRAWING TLTLL TYPE REV A NITS E (terior Elevation - O AWDS �113 )On N tAF DRAWN BV SHEET NO. 26 (6 - Alan Bradley - Coffey ZZ 6 OF 35 Copyri ht Welland Sliding Dopors and Windows. Inc. 1999 to 2010 This crawlng and (he informaton contained herein is p oprletary to Weiland Sliding Doors and Windows Inc. , and shall not be reproduced, copiel or disclosed in part or ovhole, without written permission by Weiland Slicing Doors and V indows Inca - mt noon -- riease CaKe rnese arewings very seriously and make Stoly Pole eight: N/A sure they are reviewed by all appropriate parties. By initialing this drawl g you are stating that you understand and accept the dimensions Handle Type: NIA on this drawing. These dimensions ara the dimensions we will build to, Handle Color: N/A no mater what is documented elsewhere! It is up to the customer to let us know what to build and :his drawing Is the final word In that process. Cylinder T pie: N/ Aga Inr- THESE - DIMENSIONS - SUPERSEDE ALL_ PREVIOUS-oNEs! — Cyilh-der -e IOr; -N /- -- i 112" Shim Space I 6 3/4' Syst m Le gth P1 273/411 Rough Opening r.menor Approved as'Arawn ,Resubmit with correction _Date -__ 1/2 him Space I---1 N QTM1 "R a2 -1 06A SIZE SCJILE DRA ING Tmw TYPE REV REV REVISIONS DATE A INTS, Plan Sect on - D �'� AWDS�' B ■ ! JOB NAME DRAWN By SHEET NO. A Initial Release 8/13112 w 26 6 - Ala Bradl - Coe ZZ 7 Ot 35 Sliding Doors and loin s, Inc. B Height & Width 10/4/12 Copyri t Weiland sliding Doors and windows. rn�,1999 to 2610 2501 Industry Street Oceanside CA 9205 This d awing and he informal n conteineri herein Is pioprietary to Weiland Sliding Doors and Windows Inc. ,and Tel (760) 722 -8$28 Fax: 76 722 -883 shall of be repro uced, cople or disclose In part or whole, without written p¢rmission by Welland sliding Doors RF \/ . 1 { and indows Inc. sure T Atuetnt!on MM ease take these drawings very seriously and make Story Pole Height: NIA hey are reviewed by all appropriate parties. By initialing this drawl> g you are stating that you understand and accept tie dimensions Handle Type: N/A on thi$ drawing, These dimensions are the dimensions we will build to, Handle Col r: N/A no matter what is documented elsewhere! It is up to the customer to let us know what to build and this drawing is the final word in that process. Cylinder Type: N/ Again THESE- DIMENSIONS -SUPERSEDE ALUPREVIOUS OVESI C: N/ I�ix�efl o= cfl Cn a 18 /8" `em Len tbrio 3 -1068 .:� ����� Sliding Doors and Windo 2601 Industry Street Oceanside Tel: (760) 722 -8828 Fax: 76 ( ® CA 9205 ) 722_883 SIZE A SCALE NTS REVISIONS DATE Initial Release 8113/12 JOB N 26C6 ME - Alai Width 10/4112 This j10'tWb1',gr,p,d, shal and ndows Inc. Approved as', drawn Resubmit with correction NG TITLE TYPE REV erior Elevation - O 11 AWDSI 113 ::7DR;A N BY SHEET NO. Coe 9 35 t Welland Sliding Doors and Windows. Inik 1999 to 2b10 n contained herein is p- oprietary to Welland Sliping Doors a;-id Windowsllinc. , am or disclosed in part or Ilwhole, without written p¢rmission by Welland Siloing Doors -- AEtenoon -• wease take these drawings very seriously and make StOiy Pole Height: N/A sure t�ey are reviewed by all appropriate parties. By initialing this drawing you are stating that you understand and accept the dimensions Handle Type: N/A on this drawing. These dimensions are the dimensions we will build to, Handle Color: N/A no matter what Is documented elsewhere! It is up to the customer to let us kn what to build and this drawing is the final word in that process. Cylinder Type: N/ F-- Again, THESE- DIM ENS30Nry-3UPERSEDI Atl7 !'REVIOUSONESI - - -- Cyjin —er" C lUr-N- 18 1/8 _ S stem Len QT V 1 REV A B 1/291 Shim S1 1/2' Shim S 19 1/8" R ugh peni g xt�ribr Appro ed asidrawn Resubmit with correction ,,Date_ -__— _ 00 LID N j 3_106B SIZE scAIP DRA lNC TITLE '. T'PE REV REVISIONS DATE ,,,� . A NTS Plan Sect'on - O AWDS B e i l a JOB N E DRAWN BY SHEET NO. Initial Release 8/13112 26 6 -Ala Bradl -Cole ZZ 10 °� 35 Sliding Doors and Windo , inc. Width 10/4/12 Copyright weilan Sliding Doors and ndows. In¢- 1999 to 2010 2001 Industry Street QCeanSlde CA 9205 This d awing and he Informat n contain¢ herein is proprietary to Welland Sluing Doors ajtd Windows Inc. and Tel: (760) 71.2 -8828 P. 76 722 -883 shall of be repro uced, copi or disclos In part or whole, without written p rmission by Welland Slicing Doors ( ) and Indows Inc. I— �- ivt ntlon �{ Nlease take these drawings Very seriously and make Story Pole Height: N/A S t ey are reviewed by all appropriate parties. lay initialing this drawl g you are stating that you understand and accept the dimensions Handle Type: N/A on thi# drawing. These dimensions are the dimensions we will build to, Handle Col r: N/A no matter what is documented elsewhere! It Is up to the customer to let us kn w what to build and this drawing is the final word in that process. Cylinder Type: N/ Din Aga THESE-! 77 MENSION3- Sl lPERSfD —' E—AtL- PREVIOUS-ONES! —- CYljn -ds" C lur -N/ II i I C 2 +E (0 co rrco u) I I I I l xt arior 2 3/4" I s y fe Le gth RTM1 uNrr .4 -10 B SIZE SCALE DRA ING TITLE =AWDSB� REV REVISIONS DATES ® A NTS E terior Elevation - O a l a d JOB N E DRAWry BY SHEET NO. A Initial Release 8113112 1 2g 6 - A _ Sliding Doorsond Windo s, Inc. la Bradl Corte ZZ 12 1 35 B Make Trapezoidal 10141'12 copyri ht Welland Sliding Doors and Windows. anti~ 1999 to 10 2601 Industry Street Oceanside CA 9205 This rawing and he informs on contai herein Is proprietary td Welland SII ing Doors and Windowsl Inc., and Tel' (760) 722 8828 Fax: 76 72920 shall of be repr used, co pi or disclosed In part or,Whole, wlthdut written permission by Weiland Sliding Doors ocv o ( ) and indows Inc. . -ALLCnrnun sure they -- riease taKe tnese drawings very seriously and make Stol y Pole are reylewed by all appropriate parties. By initialing this eight: N/A drawing you are stating that you understand and accept the dimensions Handle Ty e: N/A Approved asldrawn on this no mater drawing. These dimensions are the dimensions we will build to, Handle Col what is documented elsewherel It is up to the customer to let r: N/A Resubmit With correction u9 knolw r A sin,, I what to build and this drawir is the final word In that process. nder Type: r- THESE - DIMENSIONS -3UPERSEDE—At—"REVIOUSONES1 -p -- Cy111lder -C N/ lor: -N� -- -- -- _. --- - - -... `---- ��.>te' -- - -- ------ °_-- - - - --� - -- — — I 26 3 411 Sy tem eng h , 11211 1/211 Shim Space Sim Space , � I cp 7 C0 >:n 273/4 CN Ro gh Opening Eli t ri r I QTY1 NIT i4 -106B REVISIONS PATE Initial Release 8/18/12 Make Trapezoidal 10/4112 �� ® Sliding Doors 'and UJlndo s, Inc. SIZE A JOB N 26 SCALE NTS ME 6 - Ala DRa Ph Bradl ING TITLE �I in Section - O lI DRAWN BY - Cotte ZZ TY=S!B� A SHEET NO. 13 ° 35 REV A B Copyrli ht Weiland Sliding Doors and Windows. Int. 1999 to 7o10 2601 Industry Street Dceanslde CA 9205 Tel: (760) 722 -8828 Fax: (76) 722 -883 This shall awing and of be repro he informs uced, co on containebb herein is p oprietary td Weiland Sli Ing Doors and Windowsl'Inc. , and or disclos1d in part or' whole , without written pOrmission by, Welland Sliding Doars and inflows Inc. `• Attention ** Please take these drawings very seriously and make Story Pole Height: N/A sure t y are reviewed by ell appropriate parties_ By initialing this drawin you are stating that you understand and accept the dimensions Handle TYPe: N/A on thisdrawing. These dimensions are the dimensions we will build to, Handle Color: N/A no matter what is documented elsewhere! It is up to the customer to let us know what to build and this drawing Is the final word In that process. Cylinder Type' N/A Again; THESE -DII+ TENSIONS - SUPERSEDE' ACC PREVIOUS-ONES I- " - -- C- yli-1der Color —N /A cv N 2 Co E N .0 QTY REV A B mr-1 / 4 1 k 72 15116" 76 1/2" J-11 07B REVIS1pN5 DATE 0 w e i ' and Initial Release 8/13/12 Sliding Doors and Wind* r, Inc. Width 10/4/12 2001 Industry Street �ceansidCA 920! Tel: (760) 722 -8828 Fax: (76-J) 722 -8E 53" n length 2.15/16 76 112" rior A as drawn it with correction SIZE SCALE DKAIINNG 7M.F TyDE kCV A NTS Exterior Elevation - O AWDS B i DRA BN E WN By SHEET N0. 26 6 - Alan Brady - Coffley ZZ 18 0 35 Copyri ht WellanO Sliding Doors and Windows. Inc. 1999 to 2010 Thls d awing and he informat n contained herein is proprietary to Weiland Sliding Doors aid Windows Inc. , and shall of be repro Dced, copse. or disclosed in part or whole, with t written permission by Weiland Slicing Doors and Endows Enc. �I ­­m urawings very seriously and make sure fe y are reviewed by all appropriate parties. By Initialing this draw you are stating that you understand and accept tie dimensions on thdrawing. These dimensions are the dimensions we will build to, no mater what Is documented elsewhere! It is up to the customer to let us know wha to a n 7HE4SE- D]MEtNSIOPFS -S PERSEDEALL-PREVIOUsovESlt - rOCess' A Stol Hardie Handle C li Cyiihder y Pole Ty Color: T Height: ght: e: N/A N/A pe: N/ NIA Appro ed as draw Resubmit With correction -- -- i 1133 ystem Length 1112" a Shim Space G 1 /2'` Shim Space i 7ROUgh 1 4" pening LID i Ext 'or N i I III QTY1 NIT :6-1078 REVISIONS DATE nitial Release 8/13/12 sliding Doors and loin Width 1014112 fB 2601 Industry Street pCeanslde Tel (760) 722 -8828 Fax: 7$ RJ= \/ - 1 9 � � I In <, CA 9205 ) 722 -883 stz� A 26 SCALE NT 6 - Ala DRA Plan Bradl tNG TiT1.E Section - O -Coe DRAWN By ZZ TYPE REV AWDS, B SHEET NO. 19 OF 35 This shall and Vindows awing and of be reproduced, Inc. 0opyrig he Informaton copi ht Weiland contain or dlsdos S1IdIng Doors and ndows. Inc. 1999 to 10 herein is p oprietary to Weiland Slt ing Doors and Windows4nc. and d In part or Hhole, withdut written p rmiSSion byll Welland SlitEing Doors i ** Attlntion ** Flease take these drawings very seriously and make Stol'y Pole eight: N/A sure they are reviewed by all appropriate parties. By initialing this drawl you are stating that you understand and accept the dimensions Handle Typ : NIA on this drawing. These dimensions are the dimensions we will build to, Handle Col 6r: N/A no matter what is documented elsewherel It is up to the customer to let us know what to ouild and this drawing is the final word in that process. Cylif der Ty e: N/ Atgziih— THESE-DIMENSIONFS- SUPER -EJE ALI7igNIbTIS�-(SNESI ---- Cyli- d'�r -C- or:- N/ 78 Approved as drawn Resubmit with correction 84 15116" 84 15115' 88 1/2" 88 112" 177" Sirstem L ngth CD E terio !! QTY1 JNIT 40 8_1 086 SIZE SCALE ORA tNG TITLE TYPE REV REV REVISIONS DATE • ® A NTS E terior Elevation - O AWDS B JOB E DRAWN 6Y SH7ET;N O. A Initial Release 8/13112 26C6 - Ala Bradley Co e 0 Sliding Doors and tUlndo s, Inc. 35 B Height 10/4112 CopyrI5 ht Welton d, sliding Doors and Windows. Inc. 1999 to 10 2601 Industry Street pceanside CA 9205 This rawing and he lnformat on containep herein Is proprietary to Weiland Slifiing Doors d Windows Inc. ,and shall of be repr uced, Copi or disclos d in part or whole, without written perrnission bt% Welland Sluing Doors (760) 722 -8828 Fax: (76) 722 -88 and ndows Inc. != .. Attention sure drawing on this no matter us know Again; ** Please take these drawings very seriously and make t ey are reviewed by all appropriate parties. By Initiating this you are stating that you understand and accept the dimensions drawing. These dimensions are the dimensions we will build t°, what Is documented elsewhere! It is up to the customer to let what to build and this drawing is the final word in that process. THESE- DIMENSIONS "SUPERSEDE'ALt -PREVIOUS-OWESi _- StOI�Y POIe Handle Ty Handle Color: I C li Cylinder T Y n-der °C Bight: : N/A N/A pe: N� lor:-N /` N/A - - - -- __- - -- - _ - -- - -- ApPrO ed as ReSubMit with ._ - -- - -QaX -- — -) draw correction -- . - - - - -- _..- -,._ - - -- - -•- -- I System 177" Len th , I 112" Shim Space 1/2" Space --�a Shim pace G 178" :Rough - in i Openin I I Ext dor II I QTY1 Nrc x8 -1(]$B �' Sliding Doors rind Win 2601 Industry Street Pceanside Tel: (760) 722 -8828 1 Fax: (76) ® Inc, CA 92p5 722 -88 SrzE A JOB N 26 SCALE NITS E 6 -Ala DRA PI Bradl ING rITIE in Sec `on - O - Coifie DRAWN BY ZZ TYPE REV AWp g SHEET ND. 25 35 REV REVISIONS DATE A B Initial Release Height 8/13 112 101412 This rawing shall and and of be repr Indows Inc. Copyrt a InPorma used, cop! ht Weiland Sliding Doors and Windows. on contained herein Is proprietary to or disclosed in part or whole, withput , Ink 1999 to X010 Weiland Sling Doors Windows�lnc. ,and written p rmission b Weiland Sli ing Doors nr%i a in sur h« e t nuvn -- rrease caKe cnese arawings very seriously and make Story Pole ey are reviewed by all appropriate parties. By initialing this eight' sIZE dr= you are stating that you understand and accept the dimensions Handle TyP : ING TITLE on thl drawing. These dimensions are the dimensions we will build to, Handle Color: no ma us kno er what is documented elsewhere! It is up to the customer to let what to 5uild and this drawing is the final word In that Cylinder Ty e: REVISIONS = Agaln, process. THESE--DIMENSIONS= SUPERSEDE = ALL - PREVIOUS ° °ONESI = == = -- -- Cylibder -C lor:'---`... A ]Oa N i i N D tail A - Direct Set Sash i U I B CU fnitial Release 8/13/12 Sliding Sding Doors t� 6 - Ala Bradi rA DRAWN 9y SHEET NO. E 10/4/12 and Undo s, Inc. r3'r copyri ht cn 27 OF 35 N Wellanjl QTY REV A B ow s Exterior C N - CD r 'M Approved as drawn Resubmit with correction 3cking Screw Cl�dding "—� sIZE scALE ORA ING TITLE TYPE REV REVISIONS OATS ' �"� fla do A ]Oa N NTS E D tail A - Direct Set Sash AWDS' I B fnitial Release 8/13/12 Sliding Sding Doors 6 - Ala Bradi - Co#e DRAWN 9y SHEET NO. No Changes 10/4/12 and Undo s, Inc. copyri ht ZZ 27 OF 35 Wellanjl Sliding D rs and Windows. IIt. 1999 to Zb10 2601 Industry Street Qceanside, CA 920 This d awing and he Informat on contalned herein is p$oprietary td Welland Sling Doors apd Windows;Tnc. Tel: (760) 722 -8828 Fax: 76 722 -883 ( ,and shad of be repro used, capie or disclosed in part or whole, withtWt written pgrmission by'iweiland Sluing poors and indows Inc. Att n * * Please take the se drawings very seriously and make sure t are reviewed by all appropriate pa Ilesy nitialing this Stork Pole eight: dawou are stating that you understand and accept the dimensions Handle Typ on thwingse no ma jt'O dimens[ons are the dimensions we will build to, hat documenbed Hanle Col r: knohat elsewhereI It is up to the customer to let to build this drawing Cylinder Ty e: Again and is the final woin hat ocess. E5E= DIMENSIONS- SUPERSEDE =AtL= PRkVI0U5- t�n�Sr f'viirirlcr F'n nr• — = =_ Glazing Gasket Exterior n Glazing Gasket 3 1/96" Approved as drawn Resubmit with correction bate Glass, per Specs Foam Gasket Glass stop Lock per Specs Interior QTY NIT r SIZE SCALE DRA ING TITLE TYPE REV REV REVISIONS oarE ® A ITS De ail G - L krail AWLS B R a DRAWN BY SHEET NO. w e i t JOB N E A Initial Release 8/13/12 26 - Ala Bradl -Coe ZZ 34 35 Slldlrtg Doors and Wlndo s, Inc. B No Changes 1014/12 Copyri ht Wellanjl Sliding D IoIors and w�ndows. In, i�9 m zio 2601 Industry Street Oceanside, CA 9205 This d awing and he Informal n contalne4 herein 15 ptoprletary to Weiland Sliding Doors and Windows Inc. ,and Tel: (760) 722 -8828 Fax: 76 722 -883 shall of be repro used, cople or discloses In part or whole, withclrt written p rmisslon by Welland Sluing Doors �.. ( and indows Inc. ALAN- BRADLEY WiNDO�VS & DOORS U -Value Average Analysis Customer: Hans Berglund -Vail Custom Builders Project: Lapin 11/8/2012 Department of Community Development A7 75 South Frontage Road TOWN OF VAIL Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970.479.2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator TRANSMITTAL FORM Use this form when submitting additional information for planning applications or building permits. This form is also used for requesting a revision to building permits. A two hour minimum building review fee of$110 will be charged upon reissuance of the permit. Application/Permit#(s)information applies to: Attention: Q Revisions I �7 � Q Response to Correction Letter G— O_attached copy of correction letter mac,.. O Deferre Submittal PP � vtl` OOOI 1)-0071 1 Other 0-.) 5q CefL1, Project Street Address: -Z3 2- W, `(Vl-kkt\p J Tov- (Number) (Street) p, (Suite#) Building/Complex Name: `�` 'P t�' �� Description of Transmittal/List of Changes, Items Attached: 1� SULK—\ kolk� Applicant Information (� \ to S v.X�D-�tJ� (architect,contractor,o ner/ownerC's rep), Contact Name: Address: City. EDwYi2D S State: Co Zip: � 32 Contact Name: (( �� (use additional sheet if necessary) �Contact Phone: 9-7© 3 ^cps Building Permits: eMu1p Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations(Labor&Materials)Contact E-Mail: (DO NOT include original valuation) I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out Building: $ in full the information required,completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to Plumbing: $ comply with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according Electrical: $ to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- I proved,flol;4 milding and Residential Codes and other Mechanical: $ ordinan the T n applicable thereto. X Total: $0 Owner/ wner's Rep sentative Signature(Required) - Date Received: EC E 0dOR For Office Use Only: D Fee Paid: ��� 19 2019 Received From: 'J Cash Check# CC: Visa/MC Last 4 CC# exp.date: TO' OF VAIL Authorization# sµld1 s InsulVail, LLC s Post Office Box 2888 Vail, Colorado 81658 970-524-3000 Fax 970-524-3001 Mr. Benno Scheidegger Vail Custom Builders PO Box 2809 Edwards, Co. 81632 June 14,2013 PROJECT: Lapin Residence 232-234 W. Meadow Dr. Vail, Co. 81657 INSULATION CERTIFICATE SPECIFICATIONS: R- 59 Blown in Cellulose to 16" exterior ceiling R-49 7.25" polyurethane spray foam to the 2x8 exterior ceiling(Stair element) R-20 Blown in Cellulose to exterior walls R-20 Blown in Cellulose to garage exterior walls R-20 Blown in Cellulose to garage common wall R-13 Blown in Cellulose to 2x4 furred concrete exterior walls R-20 Blown in Cellulose to 2x6 furred concrete exterior walls MemBrain Smart Vapor Barrier to the exterior ceilings, exterior walls and furred concrete exterior walls R-44 Blown in Cellulose to mid floor R-44 Blown in Cellulose to crawl ceiling R-20 Blown in Cellulose to crawl concrete walls R-12 Blown in Cellulose to 2x4 sound walls R-20 Blown in Cellulose to 2x6 sound walls Foam all windows,doors and penetrations NOTES: The roof has 5" of nail base rigid insulation above framing by others The exterior walls have 2" rigid insulation on outside of framing by others Rick Rogers Branch Manager