The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutB12-0049 Inspection Items for B12-0049 14:38 02/24/2014 Sec Item Id Descri tion A r Re Items Action Inheritable 10 BLDG-FOOTING Yes R 2 AP No 20 BLDG-Foundation/Steel Yes R 2 AP No * 21 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan Yes R 1 AP No * 22 PLAN-ILC FRAMING Yes R 1 AP No 120 ELEC-Rou h Yes R 3 AP No * 200 MECH-Rou h Yes R 4 AP No * 210 PLMB-Under round Yes R 1 AP No * 230 PLMB-Rou h/Water Yes R 1 AP No * 240 PLMB-Gas Pi in Yes R 2 AP No " 410 S ecial Ins ect- ro ress re t Yes R 1 AP No ' 30 BLDG-Framin Yes R 1 AP No ` 50 BLDG-Insulation Yes R 1 AP No * 60 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail Yes R 2 AP No 70 BLDG-Misc. Yes R 3 AP No * 190 ELEC-Final Yes R 3 AP No 290 PLMB-Final Yes R 2 AP No 390 MECH-Final Yes R 1 AP No * 420 S ecial Ins ect-final re t Yes R 1 AP No * 91 PW-Final drivewa rade Yes R 3 AP No * 532 PW-TEMP. C/O Yes R 1 AP No * 539 PW-FINAL CIO Yes R 2 AP No * 540 BLDG-Final C/O Yes R 1 AP No * 90 BLDG-Final Yes R 2 AP No 534 PLAN-FINAL C/O Yes R 1 AP No Total Rows:24 Page 1 ,a,�,,.� ,�.. :. , ��;�.�.. _% �:. Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road �.�� '�� Vail, CO 81657 Tei: 970.479.2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator TRANSMITTAL FORM Use this form when submitting additional information for planning applications or building permits. This form is also used for requesting a revision to building permits. A two hour minimum building review fee of$110 will be charged upon reissuance of the permit. Application/PeRnit#(s)information applies to: Attention: o Revisions /� / � ^ D O� � � n �Response to Correction Letter (/C- �attached copy of correction letter Q Deferred Submittal ^/ � �Other �„�L Project Street Address: � �✓. G�� r�K' Ur (Number) (Street) (Suite#) Building/Complex Name: Description of Transmittal/List of Changes, Items Attached: Applicant Infortnation f'DC...c i1�4 ]�i� LL � L � (architect,contractor,owner/owner's rep) r/ Contact Name: �C�.�L GttSP��YK- 7�� I � Address: /� � - � �?C Z �O T City�--��./�4/� State: �C Q Zip: �6�G �Z � Cont2Ct Name: C s y� �2`. �' cS (use additional sheet if necessary) i Q �Contact Phone: /�0" / 0�— fl� � � guilding Permits: � Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations(Labor 8�Materials) Contact E-Mail: G �, y/ ��„ V�4�L Ct,s,S�ork.�o (DO NOT include original valuation) I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out Building: $ in full the information required,completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to Plumbing: comply with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according Electrical: to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved,International Building and Residential Codes and other Mechanical: $ ordinan s of the Town applicable thereto. Total: $� Ow er/Owner s epresentative � equired) -- -- Date Received: For Office Use Only: � � � � " � Fee Paid: D Received From: CCp � � 201^ Cash Check# JGI� L CC: Visa/MC Last 4 CC# exp.date: � �U� Authorization# TQWN C.�F VAIL � � Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road TOWN 0� UAf L ` vai�, co a�s57 Tel: 970-479-2128 ---� -- ' _.. v�rww.vailgov.com =�"�`� Development Review Coordinator TRANSl1/lITT�L FORM Revision Submittals: 1. "Fieid SeY'of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved 8�the permit is re-issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55.00 per hour(2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. �I Permit#(s)information applies to i Attention: �evisions � � n ( )Response to Correction Letter � �j/Z � O� �f �a� attached copy of correction letter I ( )Deferred Submittal i _ ( )Other l---- — --- ------- _ � �--_____—_ --- _------ - -- ` --_- — iProject Street Address: j/�__ � Go r< <r«n �J: �(Number) (Street) (Suite#) �__ __,—______ _ �Building/Complex Name: a Description/List of Changes: L f � ------ —� ��l« J� ct a�� .✓Ar � �� ( �Contractor Information } � i �/ � e P/�i D l� a��!� s � � I Business Name:_�G•L � �.cs� ��4�/��s i � I Business Address:�� 2�� 3�{er S 2 �e'e�� JK� �� ' — rn�•sf�i �3e�roo� � I City �=,��„/G�/'�,S State:�Zip: �� 3Z �`f / i IContact Name: C �� ?� ��/1 �)1'1(.0 Yl�� i3�C�� 5 3 Gd veQ� �9�7` en fi� � IContact Phone: /� � � O�j f Z �S�'�r s f�h� �`n O✓+�d 1 �ti• s I (use addition sheet if necessary) 'i Contact E-Mail:C�, h �/11�C ✓Cp�fL-�(.cS�c r� • cO�- Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations(Labor& Materials) J� (DO NOT include original valuation) I I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out ; in full the information required,completed an accurate plot plan, Building: $ . � and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to I comply with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town Plumbing: $ I ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according Ito the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- Electrical: $ I proved,Intemational Building and Residential Codes and other � � ordi c s of th Town Feto. i Mechanical: $ I � i ;Owner/Owner's Representative Signature(Required) 4 Total: $ �APPlicant Information �----.....---_._---------------- � � � �Applicant Name: �Date Received: � ; ? -( �� Applicant Phone: i � � ((� �!� �1 � � � r� � �Applicant E-Mai►: � For Office Use Only: ' I AUG 0 2 201z Fee Paid: �te�ei�ed From: TOWN OF VAIL Cash Check# CC: Visa/MC Last 4 CC# exp.date: Auth# NOTE: TH/S PERM/T MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ,. TOWN OF VAtL ' Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Permit #: B12-0049 Project #: PRJ11-0453 Job Address: 1895 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Applied.....: 03/16/2012 Location......: Issued. . . : 05/23/2012 � Parcel No....: 210312306025 OWNER DIAZAYAS, ALEJANDRO 03/16/2012 C/O DAN WOLF 953 S FRONTAGE RD, STE 222 VAI L CO 81657 ARCHITECT SHEPHERD RESOURCES, INC. 03/16/2012 Phone: 949-3302 PO BOX 1624 AVON CO 81620 � License: C000002193 APPLICANT VAIL CUSTOM BUILDERS 03/16/2012 Phone: 970-904-0512 PO BOX 2809 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: C000003221 CONTRACTOR VAIL CUSTOM BUILDERS 03/16/2012 Phone: 970-904-0512 PO BOX 2809 i EDWARDS CO 81632 License: C000003221 Description: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Occupancy: R-3 Type Construction: VB Valuation: $850,000.00 ................................................................................. FEE SUMMARY «,,......,,.,...,............_.,...,..........,...._....,_.....,...,.«,..,,,,... Building Permit-----------> $4,896.25 Bldg Plan Check----------> $3,182.56 Use Tax Fee-----------------------> $16,800.00 Electrical Permit---------> $391.00 Elec Plan Check-----------> $254.15 Restuarant Plan Review--------> $0.00 Mechanical Permit------> $740.00 Mech Plan Check---------> $185.00 Additional Fees--------------------> $0.00 Plumbing Permit--------> $375.00 Plmb Plan Check---------> $93.75 Recreation Fee--------------------> $693.90 Investigation-----------------------> $0.00 Will Call------------------------------> $20 00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES--------------> $27,631.61 Payments-------------------------------> $27,631.61 BALANCE DUE------------------------> $0.00 .,.,.x........................>...,,.,....,.....,,x=>.......,..,..,.__.......,,.,...,,.,._.,......,.____......,.....,._�,,..........,,,.......,...,,,.__..........,.......,........,... DECLARATIONS I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM -4:00 PM. combination permit_012811 � � � �w�aF�� 1 � ..................................................................................................................................................................................... CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF Permit#: B12-0049 Address: 1895 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Owner: DIAZAYAS, ALEJANDRO Location: ........................>,.,.........,.,..,.,,.......,,.,.,.,,,.,.,,.,,,,,,....,.,.,..,.,,,...,,,,,,,......>......,...,......,,...x..,.,.,..,......,...,,.,...,,....,,,....,x.,,.,,.,, Cond: CON0012534 An agreement, approved by the Town Attorney, will be � required to be executed prior to any temporay C/O releasing � the Town of all liability and maintenance of proposed "cobble swale" if any storm water is diverted from the drainage easement to the swale. Cond: 53 (FIRE 2007) Monitored fire sprinkler system required and shall comply with NFPA 13 (2007) and VFES Standards. Cond: 52 (FIRE 2002) Monitored fire alarm system required and shall comply with NFPA 72 (2002 ed.) and VFES Standards combination permit_012811 � . i T10WNOF VAIL ` *,****.***.#.****�,.*.,.***,***.********,********,.*******,****�*�..*�***..*.*****.*,**,***..*�******�*,*�***,.,****�*,*.*..****,*,******.�*****.,.******* REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES Permit#: B12-0049 Address: 1895 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Owner: DIAZAYAS, ALEJANDRO Location: .*.**«*««..��****,.***.,*.**�**«.,**„***�*******„**«***.*..****.*,,,,,,,,..*****.**.««.,.,*********,.****„**....,.*.***,,.,«*****,.,,**��****...,.,****.***.*.***,,.,.,.,.** Item: 00010 BLDG-FOOTING Item: 00020 BLDG-Foundation/Steel Item: 00021 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan Item: 00022 PLAN-ILC FRAMING Item: 00110 ELEGService Item: 00120 ELEC-Rough Item: 00200 MECH-Rough Item: 00210 PLMB-Underground ' Item: 00230 PLMB-Rough/Water i� Item: 00240 PLMB-Gas Piping Item: 00310 MECH-Heating Item: 00315 PLMB-Gas Piping Item: 00410 Special Inspect-progress rept Item: 00030 BLDG-Framing Item: 00050 BLDG-Insulation Item: 00060 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail Item: 00070 BLDG-Misc. Item: 00190 ELEC-Final Item: 00290 PLMB-Final item: 00390 MECH-Final Item: 00420 Special Inspect-final rept Item: 00025 PW-Rough grade Item: 00091 PW-Final driveway grade Item: 00501 PW-Access/Staging/Erosion Item: 00532 PW-TEMP. C/O Item: 00539 PW-FINAL C/O Item: 00090 BLDG-Final combination permit_012811 � � Department of Community Development ' 75 South Frontage Road TOWN UF VA(L` / va�i, co s�s57 / Tel: 970-479-2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (Separate applications are required for alarm &sprinkler) ; Project Street Address: � � � l— D y 5 3 Project#: I � 5- L✓• Gor� c �ce� �d�- oRB#: �DRg l 1 �5'7 y (Number) (Street) (Suite#) Building/Complex Name: Building Permit#:�`�- Q��-�� Contractor Information Lot#: Z �Block# Subdivision: V¢r.'L- V'•,JIG� ti./ 7� .��i'N .� � l Plrs y __ _ ___ __ _ _ _ _____ _ _ , Business Name: ✓Ga� L �c,�,s,�a,� j�u„ � 9 �Work Class: New(�) Addition( ) Alteration( ) � Business Address:�Q_ ��)( �- �� City� ��,�/a 1r�,s State: �D Zip: �"/�p 3 Z Type of Building: /' Single-Family(yG) Duplex( ) Multi-Family( ) Contact Name: C-�• 1��/'L �M �-t,r1 d SOl'L- Commercial ( ) Other( ) Contact Phone: 9�� ' 9 0 Gf "�Q �'j � Z— ` ..�. Work Type: Interior( ) Exterior( ) Both(� Contact E-MaiL•L�� r► /FJI'� �✓Ca��L C C,�.,s�1'✓1 . C O �'+'�- Valuation of X Work Incfuded Plans Included Work Owner/Owner's Representative Signature(Required) , . �Elec,trical ; ,.(_ )Yes ( )No ( )Yes ( )No .3��I Applicant Information �. 3�r Z Dc� � �Mechanical ( )Yes ( )No ( Yes ( )No Applicant Name:G�� j� /�j'� J��-n �Q V` Plumbing ( )Yes ( )No ( Yes ( )No Z y 5 00 Applicant Phone:��c�' �0� '"Q 'J� � � Building ( )Yes ( )No ( )Yes ( )No 7:y 3gff Applicant E-Mail: � �• Y! ��'1-�C 'rQr/L E�rj 7�Jj'r1 - Value of all work being perFormed: $p �Q� �%(% ��rn �value based on IBC Section 109.3&IRC Section 108.3� �Project Information � �Electrical Square Footage �� Owner Name:�Je ,r'art�Y'� �ia2a�/Ct S �P arcel#: Z / �,�/ 2,30�p(7 Z � �(For Parcel#,contact Eagle County Assessors O�ce at(970-328-8640 or visit �www.eaglecounty.uslpatie) .y '--�'z----�-•.=;�,,...� _.: -� _�,�.�,�«,.��-�.,�.� -- Detailed S ope and Location of Work: Cp�'7 ST/2,.�C � � �Q�/ �,�►�-�� c•r� �`/�/ �Z e 5.'��n.c' � I(use additional sheet if necessary) � -- — --� For Office Use Only: Date Received: Fee Paid: � �`-� � � � �� i�,! ��-, ,�? �_ � Received From: Cash Check # j:�'�'� MAR 16 20�"l J�� CC: Visa/ MC Last 4 CC # exp date: a�tn # TOWN OF VAIL O1-Jan-I1 Diazayaz Residence Load Calculation Geoeral Lighting and Receptacle Demand Load: � - - — -- _ _ _-- - — _ _____ -- i , 2988 sq. ft. x 3VA= � 8964 2203(a) _ _ 1,500 VA x 2= ' 3000 220.16(a) 1,500 VA x 1 = i 1500 220.16(b) Total connected load: 13,464 3,000 VA 100%_ �,000 220.11 VA ,�5%_ ' �,662.4 1281.84 Total general lighting and Receptacle demand load: 4,282 — __ - -- --- — - Range demand load: 12,OOOVA 8,000 220.19 Dryer Load: 5,000 220.18 Fixed appliance load: i Dishwasher 12 kva ' 1 1,200 Garbage disposal .8 kva 1 800 Washer 12 kva ! 2 2,400 Steam shower 9.6 kva I 1 9,600 Hot tub 8 kva i l 8,000 Total fured appliance load: 22,000 Heating load: furnace 0.2 1 200 heat tape 6 ' 200 1,200 Total heating load: I 1,400 25°/a of largest motor: ' 1,200 Diazayaz Residence Load Calculation i — _ ---- -- _ __ _- --- - - _ _ -- Totals: i � General lighting and receptacles: 4,282 Range: , 8,000 ---- -- - -- — Dryer: ' S,000 Fixed appliance: � 22,000 Heating: I l,400 25%of largest motor: _ I _ _ _1,200 _ _ ___ Total: VA 41,882 AMPS 174.51 Pro osed Service Size: ' 200A sin le hase P g P Seconda Conductors: 4/0 AL XHHW � � � � t � GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATI�N PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 26, FILING 2 � VAIL VILLAGE WEST 1895 WEST GORE CREEK DRIVE VAIL, COLORADO � � � � Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 12364 W. Alameda Pkwy • Suite 1'15 • Lakewood, CQ 80228-2845 , LAKEWOOD AVON/SILVERTHORNE (303)989-1223 (970)949-6009 (303)989-0204 FAX (970)949-9223 FAX � � KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHMCAL AND MATERIALS EIVGINEERS GEOTECHI�'ICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 26,FILING 2 VAIL VILLAGE WEST 1895 WEST GORE CREEK DRIVE VAIL,COLORADO "�pp�R E��'� QQ`�,...w..Sj.F',,, ''�% . •. . �' �'�� ' 'pr`'= � ,e: 39425 ;�_ � �Pie ��-145 ��'` . : ,. �'�B�ON A��K��,•` �kuuuu��u��+,�"� Prepazed for: Ms. Nancy Hassett P.O. Box 68 Mintum, CO 81645 Job No. OS-197 December 8, 2005 DENVER: 12364 West A[ameda Prkxy.,Suiu 11 S,Lakewood CD 802Z8(30�)989-]223 AVON/SILVERTHORNE: (970)949-6009 December 8,Z005 ROECNLEIN CONSULTING ENCI�'EERS,INC. JobNo.05-197 Consulting Ceotechnrcal �'nginetrs TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE 1 FXF.CUTIVE SUMMARY 1 SITE CONDITIONS 3 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 3 INVESTIGATION 4 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4 RADON 5 MOLD 5 EXCAVATIONS ( GROUND WATER ( FOUNDATIONS � SLABS-ON-GRADE g FOUNDATION DRAINAGE 9 LATERAL WALL LOADS 1 Q RETAINING WALLS l l SURFACE DRAINAGE 12 IRRIGATION 13 COMPACTED FILL 14 LIMITATIONS �� VICINITY MAP Fig. 1 LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY TEST PITS Fig. 2 LOGS OF EXPLORATORY TEST PITS Fig. 3 LEGEND OF EXPLOR.ATORY TEST PITS Fig. 4 GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 5 SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 6 TYPICAL WALL DR.AIN DETAIL Fig. 7 TYPICAL RETAIlVING WALL DRAIN DETAIL Fig. 8 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Table I December 8,2005 K�ECHLEIN CONSULTlNG ENGINEERS,INC. JobNo.OS-197 Consu/ting Geotechnical Engineers SCOPE This report presents the results of a geotechnical investigation far the proposed residence to be constructed on Lot 26, Filing 2, in the Vail Village West Subdivision at 1895 West Gore Creek Drive in Vail, Colorado. The approximate site location is shown on the Vicinity Map, Fig. 1. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the subsurface conditions at the site and to provide geotechnical recommendations for the proposed residence. This report includes descriptions of subsurface soil and ground water conditions encountered in the exploratory test pits, recommended foundation systems, allowable bearing capacity, and recommended design and construcrion criteria. This report was prepared from data developed during our field investigation and our experience with similar projects and subsurface conditions in the area The recommendations presented in this report are based on a residence being constructed on the lot at the approximate location shov�m on the Locations of Exploratory Test Pits, Fig. 2. We should be contacted by the contractor andlor owner to review our recommendations when final plans for the residence have been �'ompleted. A summary of our findings and conclusions is presented below. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. The subsurface conditions encountered in the expIoratory test pits were similar. The subsurface conditions consisted of up to 1.5 feet of tapsoil overlying medium stiff, silty clay to depths varying between 5.0 and 6.0 feet, Underlying the silty clay, the subsurface conditions consisted of very dense, silty, gravelly, sandy cobbles and boulders to the maximum depths December 8,2005 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINE'ERS,INC JobNo.05-197 Consulting Geotecbnica! Engineers I explored of 11.5 feet in exploratory test pit TP-1 and 11.0 feet in exploratory test pit TP-2. Laboratory test results indicate the silty clay has nil to very low swell potential. Refer to the SUBSURFACE CONDITIOIvTS section of this report for addirional details. 2. At the time of this investigation, no free groundwater was encountered in either of the exploratory test pits, to the maximum depth explored of 11.5 feet in exploratory test pit TP-1 and 11.0 feet in exploratory test pit TP-2. Refer to the GROLTND WATER section of this report for additional details. 3. Up to 1.5 feet of topsoil was encountered in the exploratory test pits. However, greater depths of topsoil could be encountered across the site. Any topsoil will need to be removed from all construction areas prior to construction. The topsoil may be used in landscaping areas. 4. In our opinion, the naturaI, sandy cobbles and boulders will safely support a spread footing foundation system for the proposed residence with a low risk of movement. Refer to the FOUNDATIONS section of this report for more details. 5. V6'e anticipate that the subsurface conditions at the proposed floor slab elevation will consist of the natural, sandy cobbles and boulders. In our opinion, the natural, sandy cobbles and boulders will safely support slab- on-grade floors with a low risk of movement. Refer to the SLABS-ON- GRADE section of this report for more details. 6. Open cuts and excavations require precautions as outlined in this report in order to maintain the stability of slopes and sides of excavations. Refer to the EXCAVATIONS section of this report for additional details. 7. Because cobbles and boulders were encountered in our exploratory test pits, it is our opinion that heavy-duty construction equipment will be necessary to complete the required excavations. Refer to the EXCAVATIONS section of this report for more details. S. Drainage around the residence should be designed and constructed to provide for rapid removal of surface nanoff and avoid concentration of water adjacent to foundation walls. Refer to the SURFACE DR.AINAGE section of this report for details. 9. The potential for radon gas is a concem in the area. Refer to the.RADON section of this report for additional details. 2 Dcxember 8,2005 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGlNEERS,INC. JobNo.05-197 Consulting Centechnical Engineers 10. Mold has become a concem with new construction. Refer to the MOLD section of this report for additional details. SITE CONDITTONS 'The proposed residence will be constructed on Lot 26, Filing 2, in the Vail Village West Subdivision at 1895 yVest Gore Creek Drive in Vail, Colorado. The lot is accessed from West Gore Creek Drive, which borders the south side of the site. Existing multi-family residences border the site to the east and west. ZJore Creek borders the site to the north. At the time of this investigation, the subject lot was undeveloped and covered with approximately 1 foot of snow. Site topography slopes down to the northwest at an approximate grade of 3 percent. Vegetation on the lot consists of grasses and weeds,with bushes and pine trees growing at the edge of Gore Creek. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION At the time of this investigation, plans for the residence were not available. However, based on a conversation with the architect, we understand that a two-story residence with a below grade level will be constructed on the lot. We anticipate that the proposed residence will be constructed of cast-in-place concrete and wood frame construction with slab-on-grade floors. We anticipate that excavations up to 6.0 feet in depth will be necessary for construction of the proposec2 below grade azea. Maximum column and wall loads were assurned to be those normally associated with residential construction. 3 December 8,2005 KOECNLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,/NC JobNo.05-197 Consultirtg Geotechnica! Errgineers INVESTIGATION Subsurface conditions were investigated at this site on November 22, 2005 by excavating two exploratory test pits with a trackhoe at the approximate locations shown on the Locations of Exploratory Test Pits,Fig. 2. An engineer from our office was on the site to observe the excavation of the exploratory test pits and visual}y classify and document the subsurface soil and ground water conditions. A description of the subsurface soils encountered in the exploratory test pits is shown on the Logs of Exploratory Test Pits, Fig. 3; and on the Legend of Exploratory Test Pits, Fig. 4. Laboratory tests were gerformed on selected samples obtained during the excavation of the exploratory test pits to determine their natural moisture content, natural dry density, gradation properties, and swell-consolidation properties. Results of the laboratory testing are presented on the Logs of Exploratory Test Pits, Fig. 3; on the Gradation Test Results, Fig. 5;on the Swell-Consolidation Test Results,Fig. 6; and in the Summary of Laboratory Testing, Table I. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 'I'he subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory test pits were similaz. The subsurface conditions consisted of up to 1.5 feet of topsoil overlying tan, brown, moist, medium stiff, sandy, siity ctay with scattered cobbles and boulders to a depth of 6.0 feet in exploratory test pit TP-1 and 5.0 feet in exploratory test pit TP-2. Underlying the sandy, silty clay to the maximum depth explored of 11.5 feet in exploratory test pit 4 December 8,2005 ICOECHL�7N CONSULTING ENGINEERS,ING JobNo.05-197 Consulting Ceotechnical Engineers TP-1 and 11.0 feet in exploratory test pit TP-2, the subsurface conditions consisted of light brown, moist, very dense, silty, gravelly, sandy cobbles and boulders. Boulders up � to 3.5 feet in diameter were encountered in exploratory test pit TP-2. Laboratory test results indicate that the silty,sandy clay has nil to very low swell potential. At the time of this investigation, no free ground water was encountered in either of the exploratory test pits to the maximum depth explored of 11.5 feet in exploratory test pit TP-1 and 11.0 feet in exploratory test pit TP-2. RADON In recent yeazs, radon gas has become a concem. Radon gas is a colorless, odorless gas that is produced by the decay of minerals in soil and rock. The potential for radon gas in the subsurface strata of mountain terrain is likely. Because the proposed residence will be constructed with a below grade area, we suggest that the residence be designed with ventilation for the below grade areas. MOLD Mold has become a concern with new construction. Mold tends to develop in dark or damp areas such as below gade areas, underfloor spaces, or bathrooms. Recommendations for the prevention, remediation, and/or mitigation of mold aze outside the scope of this investigation. We recommend that the owner contact a Professional Industrial Hygienist for recommendations for the prevention, remediation, andlor mitigation of mold. 5 December 8,2005 KOECHLEINCONSULTINGENGINEERS,INC. JobNo.05-197 Consuhing Ceotechnical Engineers EXCAVATIONS We anticipate that excavations of up to 6.0 feet will be required for construction of the proposed residence. Because cobbles and boulders were encountered in our exploratory test pits, it is our opinion that heavy-duty construction equipment will be required to complete the necessary excavations. Care needs to be exercised during construction so that the excavation slopes remain stable. The subsurface soil, which consisted of silty clay and sandy cobbles and boulders, classifies as Type B soils in accordance with OSHA regulations. OSHA regulations should be followed in all excavations and cuts. Topsoil up to 1.5 feet in depth was encountered in the exploratory test pits. However, greater depths of topsoil could be encountered across the site. All topsoil beneath the proposed construction areas should be removed. The topsoil may be used in landscape areas. Backfill should be placed and compacted as recommended in the COMPACTED FILL section of this report. GROUND WATER At the time of this investigation, no free ground water was observed in either of the exploratory test pits to the m�imum depth explored of 11.5 feet in exploratory test pit TP-1 and 11.0 feet in exploratory test pit TP-2. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory test pits, we do not anticipate that ground water will adversely influence the construction of the proposed residence. However, based on the 6 December S,2005 KOECHLEIN CONSULTJrVG ENGINEERS,ING JobNo.05-197 Consulling Ceotechnical Engineers ' proximity of Gore Creek, it is possible that ground water could be encountered in excavarions just slightly deeper than 11.5 feet, especially during wetter times of the year, such as Spring. If ground water is encountered witbin the excavation for the proposed residence during construction, we should be contacted immediately to provide specific recommendations at that time. FOUNDATIONS We anticipate that the subsurface conditions at the foundation elevation for the propased residence will consist of the natural, sandy cobbles and boulders. In our opinion, the natural, sandy cobbles and boulders will safely support a spread footing foundation system for the proposed residence with a low risk of movement. We recommend that the spread footing foundation systems at this site be designed and constructed to meet the following criteria: 1. Footings may be supported by the natural, sandy cobbles and boulders or properly moisture conditioned and compacted structural fill as recommended below in Items 7, 8, and 9. 2. Spread footings constructed on the sandy cobbles and boulders may be designed for a rna�cimum allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. 3. Spread footings constructed on the natural, sandy cobbles and boulders should experience less than 0.5 inch of differential movement between foundation elements. Because the soils are granular in nature, we anticipate that the majority of the differential settlement will occur during construction. 4. Wall footings and foundation walls should be designed to span a distance of at least 10.0 feet in order to account for anomalies in the soil. 7 December 8,2005 KOECHLEIN CONSULTl1VG ENGIIYEERS,INC. JobNo.05-197 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 5. The base of the exterior footings should be established at a minimum depth below the exterior ground surface, as required by the local building code. We believe that the depth for frost protection in the local building code in this area is 4.0 feet. 6. Column footings should have a minimum diznension of 24 inches square and continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of I6 inches. Footing widths may be greater to accommodate structural design laads. 7. Pockets or layers of loose soil may be encountered in the bottom of the completed footing excavations. These materials should be removed to expose the undisturbed, natural, sandy cobbles and boulders. The foundations should be constructed on the natural, sandy cobbles and boulders or properly moisture conditioned and compacted structural fill. Refer to the COI�ZPACTED FILL section of this report for fill requirements. 8. Vl%e anticipate that cobbles and boulders may be encountered at the foundation elevation. Removal of the cobbles and boulders may result in depressions and rough bottoms in the excavation. The resulting depressions can be backfilled with compacted structural fill or lean concrete. Refer to the COMPACTED FILL section of this report for backfill requirements. 9. Fill should be placed and compacted as outlined in the COMPACTED FILL section c�f this report. We recommend that a representative of our office observe and test the placement and compaction of the structural fill used in foundation construction. It has been our experience that without engineering quality control, inappropriate construction techniques occur that result in poor foundation performance. 10. A representative of our office should observe the campleted foundation excavation. Variations from the conditions described in this report, which were not encountered within the test pits, can occur. The representative can observe the excavation to evaluate the exposed subsurface conditions. SLABS-ON-GRADE The materials at the approximate floor slab elevatian will consist of the natural, sandy cobbles and boulders. In our opinion, the natural, sandy, cobbles and boulders will 8 December 8,2005 KOECHLEIN CONSULT/NG ENGINEERS,INC. JobNo.05-197 Consu[tiag Ceotechnica! Engineers safely support slabs-on-grade with a low risk of movement. We recommend the following precautions for the construction of slabs-on-grade at this site: 1. Slabs-on-grade may be constructed on the natural, sandy, cobbles and boulders or properly moisture conditioned and compacted structural fill. 2. All topsoil beneath proposed slabs-on-grade should be removed prior to construction of the slabs or placement of fill. 3. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing members. Vertical movement of the slabs should not be restricted. 4. Exterior slabs should be separated from the residence. These slabs should be reinforced to function as independent units. Movement of these slabs should not be transmitted directly to the foundations or walls of the residence. 5. Frequent control joints should be provided in ail slabs to reduce problems associated with shrinkage of the concrete. 6. Structural fill beneath exterior slabs-on-grades may consist of the natural, sand and gravel, or appmved, non-expansive, imported fill. Fill should be placed and compacted as recommended in the COMPACTED FILL section of this report. Failure to properly moisture treat and compact the soils will resutt in excessive settlement and potential cracking of slabs-on- grade. Placement and compaction of fill beneath slabs should be observed and tested by a representative of our office. FOUNDATION DRAINAGE Surface water, especially that originating from rain or snowmelt, tends to flow through relatively permeable backfill rypically found adjacent to foundations. The water that �Iows through the fill collects on the surface of relatively impermeable soils occumng at the foundation elevation. Both this surface water and possible ground water can cause wet or moist below grade conditions after construction. 9 December 8,200� KOECHLEIN CONSULTINC ENGINEERS,INC. JobNo.05-197 Consulting Geotechnica! Engineers Since we anticipate the proposed residence will be constructed with a below grade area, we recommend the instailarion of a drain along the below grade foundation wa11s. The drain should consist of a 4-inch diameter perforated pipe encased in free draining gravel and a manufactured wall drain. The gravel should have a maacimum size of 1.5 inches and have a maximum of 3 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. Washed concrete aggregate will be satisfactory for the drainage layer. The drain should be sloped so that water flows to a sump where the water can be removed by pumping, or to a positive gravity outlet. Recommended detaits for a typica.l foundation wall drain are presented in the Typical Wa1l Drain Detail,Fig. 7. LATERAL WALL LOADS We anticipate that below grade walls will be planned which require lateral earth pressures for design. Lateral earth pressures depend on the type of backfill and the height and type of wall. Walls that are free to rotate sufficiently to mobilize the strength of the backfill should be designed to resist the "active" earth pressure condition. Wal]s, which are restrained, should be designed to resist the "at rest" earth pressure condition. Below grade walls are typically restrained. The following table presents the lateral wall pressures that may be used for design. 10 Dece�nber 8,2005 KOECHLEIN CONSULTI.NG ENGINEERS,INC JobNo.05-197 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers Earth Pressure Condition Equivalent Fluid Pressure' c Active 40 At-rest 55 I Passive 300 Notes: l. Equivalent fluid pressures are for a horizontal backfill condition with no hydrostatic pressures or live loads. 2. A coefficient of friction of 0.4 may be used at the base of spread footings and grade beams constructed on the natural, sand , cobbles and boulders to resist lateral loads. Backfill placed behind or a.djacent to foundation walls and retaining wa11s should be placed and compacted as recommended in the COMPACTED FILL section of this report. Placement and compaction of the fill should be observed and tested by a representative of our office. RETAINING WALLS We do not anticipate that retaining wa11s will be constructed on this site. However, if plans change and retaining walls are constructed as part of the development of this site,we have provided the following information. Foundations for retaining walls may be designed and constructed as outlined in the FOLJ�TDATIOI`'S section of this report. Lateral earth loads for retaining wall designs are presented in the LATERA.L WALL LOADS section of this report. In order to reduce the gossibility of developing hydrostatic pressures behind retaining walls, a drain should be constructed adjacent to the wall. The drain may consist of a manufactured drain system and gravel. The gravel should have a maximum size af 11 December S,2005 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC JobNo.05-197 Consu[ting Geotecirnical Engineers I.5 inches and have a maximum of 3 percent passing the No.20Q sieve. Washed concrete aggregate will be satisfactory for the drainage layer. The manufactured drain should extend from the bottom of the retaining wall to within 2 feet of subgrade elevation. The water can be drained by a perforated pipe with collection of the water at the bottom of the wall leading to a positive gravity outlet. A typical detail for a retaining wa11 drain is presented in the Typical Retaining Wall Drain Detail, Fig. 8. SURFACE DRAINAGE Reducing the wetting of structural soils and the potential of developing hydrostatic pressure behind below grade walls or retaining walls can be achieved by carefully planned and maintained surface drainage. We recommend the following precautions be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence is completed. 1. Wetting or drying of the open excavation should be minimized during construction. 2. All surface water should be directed away from the top and sides of the excavation during construction. 3. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the residence should be sloped to drain away from the building in all direcrions. We recommend a slope of at least I2 inches in the first 10 feet. 4. Hardscape(concrete and asphalt) should be sloped to drain away from the residence. We recommend a slope of at lea�t 2 percent for all hardscape within I O feet of the building. 5. BackfilI, especially around foundation walls, should be placed and compacted as recommended in the COMPACTED FILL section of this report. 12 December 8,2005 XOECNLEIN CONSULTING 6NGINEERS,INC. � JobNo.05-197 Consulting Geotechnica! Engineers 6. Roof drains should discharge at least 10 feet away from foundation walls with drainage duected away from the residence. IRRIGATION Imgation systems installed next to foundation walls or slabs-on-grade could cause consolidation of backfill below and adjacent to these areas. This can result in settling of exterior steps, patios and/or sidewalks if they are constructed on these soils. We recommend the following precautions be followed: 1. Do not install an irrigation system next to foundation walls or above retaining walls. The irrigation system should be at least 10 feet away from the residence or face of retaining walls. 2. Irrigation heads should be pointed away from the residence or in a manner that does not allow the spray to come within 5 feet of the residence or face of retaining walls. 3. The landscape around the imgation system should be sloped sa that no ponding occurs at the irrigation heads. 4. Instail landscaping geotextile fabrics to inhibit growth of weeds and to allow normal moisture evaporation. We do not recommend the use of a plasric membrane to inhibit the growth of weeds. 5. Control valve boxes, for automatic irrigation systems, should be located at least 10 feet away from the residence and periodically checked for leaks and flooding. 6. Surface drainage for this site should be designed by a Professional Civil Engineer. I3 December 8,2005 KOECHLEIN CONSULTlNG ENGINEERS,INC. JobNo.05-I97 Consulting Geotecknicat Engineers COMPACTED FILL Structural fill far this project may consist of the on-site granular soils or approved imported granular fill. The imported fill may consist of non-expansive silty or clayey sands ar gravels with up to 30 percent passing the No. 200 sieve and a m�imum plasticity index of 10. No cobbles or boulders larger than 6 inches should be placed in fill areas. Fill areas should be stripped of all vegetation and topsoil, scarified, and then compacted. Topsoil may be used in landscape areas. Fill should be placed in thin loose lifts then moisture treated and compacted as show�n in the following table. The recommended compaction varies for the given use of the fill. Recommended Com action Percentage of the Standard Percentage of the Modified Use of Fill Proctor Maximum Dry Density Proctor Maximum Dry Density ASTM D-698 ASTM D-1557) Below Foundations 98 95 Below Slabs-On-Grade 95 90 Utilit Trench Backfill 95 90 Backfill on-Structural) 90 90 Notes: l. For clay soils the moisture content should be 0 to +3 percent of the optimum moisture content. 2. For anular soils the moisture content should be—2 to+2 of the o timum moisture content. We recommend that a representative from our office observe and test the placement and compaction of each lift placed for structural fill. Fill placed behind retaining walls, belaw foundations, and beneath slabs-on-grade is considered structural. It has been our experience that without engineering quality control, inappropriate construction techniques can occur, which results in poor foundarion and slab performance. I4 December 8,2005 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGlNEERS,lNC. JobNo.05-197 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers I � LIMITATIONS Although the exploratory test pits were located to obtain a reasonably accurate determination of subsurface conditions on this site, variations in the subsurface conditions are always possible. Any variations that exist beneath the site generally become evident during excavation for the residence. Therefore, we should be contacted by the contractor and/or owner so that a representative of our office can observe the completed excavations to confirm that the soils are as indicated by the exploratory test pits and to verify our foundation and slab-on-grade recommendations. The placement and compaction of fill, as well as installation of foundations, should also be observed and tested. T'he design criteria and subsurface data presented in this report are valid for 3 years provided that a representative from our office observes the site at that time.and confirms that the site conditions are similar to the conditions presented in the SITE CONDITIONS section of this report and that the recommendarions presented in this report are still applicable. We recommend that final plans and specifications for proposed construction be submitted to our office for study, prior to beg-inning construction, to determine compliance with the recommendations presented in this report and that the recommendations presented in this report are sti11 applicable. 15 December 8,2005 KOECHLEtN CONSULTINC ENCINE�'RS,INC. 1obNo.05-197 Consulting Ceotechnical Engineers We appreciate the opportunity to provide this service. If we can be of further assistance in discussing the contents of this report or in analyses of the proposed residence frorn a geotechnical viewpoint,please contact our office. KOECH��CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. `��U1 �Jlf//�� \`��.o�ap0 REG�sl,,,,. , : w ��9�.. • ��`4�f..�; � �,o; 39425 ;�; s�o: l2-�A1o.� :�,`"; s .�.e►•., �:�.�,� 0 y''4h'��f l l��j i`1��``\\\`� Richard M.Wenzel III,P.E. Project Engineer Reviewed by: � Y Scott B. Myers, P.E. Senior Engineer (4 copies sent) 16 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. Consuiting Geotechnical Engineers �� G �^ m � � �'pT, C.1 � �� . �'�iJt�''2��'�A C�� , � C Q"•�� r� r �t�� G�u �' �vt� t,.i .lft�¢ �s �r,�' : CB ' ��u �` -�'Z c.t� ^v` , �`�' � 5t�-�{t e G0. y4+ SITE NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP JOB NO.Q5-197 FIG.1 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. Consulting Geotechnical Ergineers APPROXtMATE CENTERLINE OF GORE CREEK � , / ,,''�f�. � ,/ EDGE OF ��'�,� / GORE CREEK �J � f J; R I f f ti� /' 1�' { f /,F � f� � / � . r��1 j' // J,r 1 / � �r� �, ff BUILDING �� ' '� ' ENVELOPE _- ��` �� ,� --'"�J/` -�� E ,� ,; %' � !� f/ � � TP 1 � r`J ,r` � � �� ` ' �. ; ' i / ` � r ' �� / ;' / ,; _ �rr;z � ` ,,,r'� fi �� t . j .--- /--� ✓ .�. �- , . ! �� f' LOT 26 �1 � . /�, 1895 WEST GORE CREEK # F, '� DRIVE ��, /~ �: , j" � `i . /, . i / j 'to.. BENCHMARK ;�/ \ ,'� EL. 7942.5 / r - `, ,` � TP-2 ' ' • r f/ J . V � PROPERTY �.�` BOUNDARY " ''' ,e� �� ` ,l � ,. ��0 r' ` p Q� � ��; r,� ��G , �� GO 1 y� f �-� �� 7„=20� f LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY TEST PITS JOB NO.05-197 EIG.2 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 7950 795� TP-1 EL. 7946.3 TP-2 EL. 7945.6 7945 7945 . .. . .. . . .. . .. , . • •� WC=28 � �� • DD=93 7940 ��: .pa 7940 0 0� a • ' b' �� :d o� WC=13 p 7935 -200=24 � 7935 w m w � � m Z 7930 7930 D O � F- O Q Z w m � m W 7925 7925 � 7920 7920 7915 7915 7910 7910 LOGS OF EXPLORATORY TEST PITS JOB NO.05-197 FlG.3 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers LEGEND: � TOPSOIL � ;; CLAY, Silty, Sandy, Scattered cobbies and �� boulders, Moist, Medium stiff, Tan, Brown. � COBBLES and BOULDERS, Sandy, Gravelly, Silty, Moist,Very dense, Light brown. � BULK SAMPLE. Obtained from the bucket of the trackhoe. � HAND DRIVE SAMPLE. lndicates 2.0 inch diameter brass liner driven into the soil by a hammer. Notes: 1. The explorafory test pits were excavated on November 22, 2005 using a trackhoe. 2. No free ground water was encountered in either test pit to the maximum depth explored of 25.0 feet. 3.The Test Pit Logs are subject to the explanations, limitations, and canclusions as contained in this report. 4. Laboratory Test Results: WC-Indicates natural moisture(°�) DD- Indicates dry density(pcfl -200- Indicates percent passing the No. 200 sieve(%) 5.Approximate elevations were determined with a Stanley Compulevel Elevation Measurement System using the existing manhole near the northwest corner of the lot as a benchmark. The elevation of the manho(e was taken from a topographic survey map provided by Eagle Valley Surveying, Inc. and was reported as EL. 7942.5. LEGEND OF EXPLORATORY TEST PITS JOB NO.OS-197 FIG.4 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS T,., m , ,m , „ .. ., ., .. . �oo , ; � i � � � ! ; � , ' � , �, � � I �' I j � � ; o � ' : ! I i � , i ; �� I � j j , i j i � i � I f� � , i i j i i i i j � i I � j I' � —10 BO I � � i I 1 � � �o I i � i i! I ; ' i '� � + I ' , � I � I I � Z I I ( I � -- � � ii ( � I_.. 30 � m � j I � � I� i _i i � � � � � � - — 40 n N i j �� j � ! f I m � I ' � ! ! ; ' � � � s� � � ! � z ; ' ' � ' � , ' i � � m � � � � 40 , � � I 1 ; � �__ ! ! �-- --;-�- � � � D � i 1� I � ' a i � I � ! �I i i I I i 1T I � � �� ' I � � ( ( � m so- � � ` � f � o f i i � �i I � � j j � � i � � ! � I , � 70 20 I i j I � ( � I ( I I � ! � � _ � � � � I � � � � E � �I �—80 � ' i � _�i ' I I ( ' I to ---- ' � p I i I I I I ' I f i ( � I � � i � ' I � � i ( � 90 � too 200 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 DIAMETER OF PARTICIE IN MM COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Sample of SAND,Gravelly,Silty GRAVEL 26 % SAND 50 % Source TP-1 Sampie No. Elev./Depth 10.5 feet SILT 8�CLAY 24 °/a LIQUD LIM(T °/, PLASTICITY INDEX °/, Sample of GRAVEL °k SAND % Sou�ce Sample No, EIevJDepth SILT�CLAY % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTlCITY INDEX % GRADATION TEST RESULTS Job No. OS-197 FIG.5 � � KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS -3 � � I ! ; � ( { I � � � I I � ' i � � I � I ; I ' i � 'I i I � �I � � I ' I i I � ! I � I i i j I I � � � ; f ; ; ; ! � ' � � i ; j � j � ' j � ! j ; � � -z � � ' II � i � I � ! i i ! I � ( � � ` � II � � ; , j ', i i � I j � � � I ; i � I I � � � I ! j j � ' I i ; ( ; i ' � j � i I I _ I ; I � ' I � I ; , f ! ! ! , ; j ' ; , I i � � ; i i i � , i � i � I I i ; i � � � � � ' � � ' I I ( � ; ; � ; � � � � � �� ; � , � i � I � i � ! � � I ' il o , ; � � i � � i � � � � � � � � � � � I i ; � I I i i I � i i I ( I i ; � I � I � i ! I � I � ! I i � � � ! � � � I i � , I � I � i � i � I i � ' I i � ' ' ' ' ' I � ' f I � � � I i I � ' , I � � ' � I ' � � f � � ' j � i � � , ' I I � I � I � I i � � i i i i i � I � � � 2 I a � � ( � � i I � i i , I � � � ( � G � 1 i I f i i � � � ( � � � � � � � � i � ; I � � , � � ► � i � � � � i � i � i I ! � � ' � � ; � � ! ( � i � i � � 3 � i WATER ADDED : � � � � ' ' � � i � i j � ' I I I I ! � 1 � � ` ; I � � � ' ; I I ; f i � � � ' ! � � � � , � � i � � ! ' 1 � i i ( ! � � I 1 ' � I � i � i � � � f I j I j � ! I � � I I � I I � � � i i I � ' ( 4 . , : , � � I � ( � ( + ( � � i ` � I ' ' I � ( � � � � � . � � ! � � � + ; � � j � I � i � � � � � I � � � I ( ! � I � { i � � I E I " � 5 : ; ( � � � � � ' ' � ' � i { � � ' : f I I � ► ' i i � i i � � � ' � � + � � � � ; j ; � � ; � � � � ; � � ' � � � . i � ' I ! ; � ; � i ; � � ' � � ` i I ! � il � ; ; , ( � � � ; ; ; � � I ; � � � � � � � i ( � l � 6 , i � � � I i ' � � ( I ! i � { I ' , ` � I � ( ! i ! � � ( � " I i � i f � � � I � { � i � � i ! � I ! � ' ' � I � , ; ; i I � � � � ( � � � �� , ' � � � � � � � � � �� I ( i � j � � i I � ( ( i � ' , � � � i i 7 � � ( •1 _ •2 •5 1 2 5 10 20 50 Pressure,p,ksf Sample of CLAY,Silty Natural Dry Unit Weight= 92.7 (pcf} Source TP-2 Sampie No. EIevJDepth 4.0 feet Natural Moisture Content= 28 °�6 SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Job No. OS-197 FIG.6 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. Consuiting Geotechnical Engineers CLAYEY BACKFILL �O - - _ ll - - - =1�,f�I �—_ _ y�� COMPACTED BACKFIIL gELOW GRADE WALL EDGE OF EXCAYATION (IXCAVATE AS PER OSHA REGULATIONS) MANUFACTURED WALL DRA1N� WATERPROOFING OR DAMPPROOFING FILTER FABRIC GRAVEL 12' PLASTIC SHEETING f----#-12"AIIN. PERFORATED PIPE NOTES: 1. DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 12 INCHES BELOW TOP OF FOOl1NG AT THE HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD TO A POSITNE GRAVITI OUTLET OR TO A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE REMOVED BY PUMPING. 2. EXCAVATIONS ADJACENT TO FOOTINGS SHOULD BE CIJT AT A 1 TO 1 (HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL)OR FLATTER SLOPE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTfNGS. DCCAVATIONS ADJACENT TO FOOTINGS SHOULD NOT BE CUT VERTICALLY. 3. THE DRAIN SHOULD BE LAID ON A SLOPE RANGING BETWEEN 1/8 INCH AND 1/4 INCH DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN. 4. GRAVEL SPECIFfCATIONS: WASHED 1.5 INCH TO NO.4 GRAVEL WITH LESS THAN 3%PASSING THE NO.240 SIEVE. 5. THE BELOW GRADE CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALlS SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM MOISTURE INFILTRATION BY APPLYING A SPRAYED ON MASTIC WATERPROOFING,DAMPPROOFING,OR AN EQUIVALENT PROTECTION METHOQ. TYPICAL WALL DRAIN DETAIL JOB NO.05-197 FIG.7 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. Consulting Geotechnicat Engineers CLAYEY BACKFILL �,� – – _ 1I – — MANUFACTURED �I�� – WALL DRAIN -.y�� COMPACTED BACKFILL RETAlNING WALL EDGE OF D(CAVATION (EXCAVATE AS PER OSHA REGULATIONS) WATERPROOFING OR DAMPPROOFING FILTER FA8 C G L 0 0 O PERFORATED PIPE NOTES: 1. DRAIN SHOULD BE SLOPED DOWNWARD TO A POSITIVE GRAVITY OUTLET OR TO A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE REMOVED BY PUMPIMG. 2. THE DRAIN SHOULD BE lAID ON A SLOPE RANGING BETWEEN 1/8 INCH AND 1/41NCH DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN. 3. GRAVEL SPECIFICATIONS: 1.51NCH TO NO.4 GRAVEL WfTH LESS?`HAN 3 ys PASSING THE NO.200 SIEVE. 4. THE BELOW GRADE CONCRETE RETAINING WALLS SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM MOISTURE INFILTRATION BY APPLYING A SPRAYED ON MASTIC WATERPROOFING,DAMPPROOFING,OR AN EQUIVALENT PROTECTION METHOD. TYPICAL RETAtNING WALL DRAIN DETAIL JOB NO.OS-19T FtG.8 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TF.,ST RESULTS TAIILEI SAMPLC NATURl1L NATURAL ATTERBERG LIMITS PASSING PERCENI' DRY PLASTICITY NO. 200 SWELL AT HOLE DEPTI-I MOISTURE LIQUID LIMIT INDEX SIEVE 1 000 PSF SOIL 7'YP� (rt) �o�o� DENSITY o � �P�� (/o) (%) (%) (%) '1'P-I 10.5 13 24 SAND,Graveliy,Silty TP-2 4A 28 93 +(1.1 CLAY,Silt JOB NO. 05-197 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. � ! � � . ; ��/ � �._ �z ��:�� l'`! � � :D � � ��; a� � �� '� � � �. �� ' �'�.�: '�.... � � R�, � LO�� r!1✓.�i .w .. . - . ._ .._. `i 3 . � ��,z,� �4, zo�2 TOWN OF VAIL Vail t;us�c�rn I3uilciers Attn: (:'I1I1�011 f�t1111i1CISQll E P.O. Box 2�09 �` � Edwards, Colvrado 81632 t � Job No. l 12 OS1A Subject: �bser��ation c�f Excavatic�n, Fropos�d Residenee, I...�t?6, V��il Village � � West, Pil'uig 2, 189�i W'est Ciore Creel: Drive, �'�il, Cal�racic> D�.ar Clintan: ,!1s requestcd, a represent�ative of Hepworth-Pa��lak Geotechl�ical, Inc. «bserved the exca4�atic�n at the subject site on Juile I, S; 11 a.nd 13, 2012 to evaluate the soils expased for fc3ul�datiot�� s�:�pport. '1 Ile tuld�ings of ow•obserc�ations and �•ecomnyendations for the ��oundatioi� �esi�n a�re preserited in this rzpor�t. Itoechlein Consulting Gec�technical Engineers �reviously conductect a subsc3il stuciy for design of foundaticrns at th�sitc:and presenteci their findings in a report datc:d December$, 2Q05, Job No. OS-197. Wc � presented interit�l fn.dings of�the bearing soil and groundwater seepage ca��ditions i�i a repo�•t dated June 7, 20l 2, Jab No. 112 O51 A. The residencc will be a 2-story structure with a gara�e at the m�in level. "I'here will be a walkout lo��er le��el in the western part and a full clepth basement in the eastcrn part. C�round flo�rs ��ill be slal�-oil-grade. Sprc�ad fc�otings pl.acecl the nt�tural �ravel soils and sizec� for an allowable Gearuig pres�ure c�f 3,Q00 psf were used tor th�I�uilding support baseci on the Koechleiu report:. At the tiine of aur initial visit ta the site, the builciing�xcavatio�� had been cut in multiple Ievels frorn 2 tu �I teet bel�v��the adjacent ��•�und surface. The stcps be>tweei� levels were fY,�in 2 tc� 5 feet and down to thc;nortl� and cast. The soi15 expc�sed ii�the bottom of'the eYCa��ation consisted�>f mainly silty sandy gY-avel and cobhles with boulders. 1'he�arage footing treriches (2 feet dee�) expascd �•ery clayey sand w�itl�gra4�c1. � aznall area of stariding water�ras encountcred in the cieeper cut, south end of the baseXnent. The r-esults af a gradatian test perfc�rmed on a sam��le of tiie gravel(minus �-inch) are preseYrted in Figure 1. L�%�hen at�served �»z Jun�5; the basement area excavation had b�en deepened about an� foot arad cUC�siclet-ably rnare�-ound��atcr �i-a5 enct�ui�tet�ed. 1'l�e recommend�d that a trcnch about one foot deep be dug just outside ofthe basem�nt perimeter walls��nd slc�ped to claylight for excavat�ion decvaterin�. The trench should b� l��ckfillecl rcitll crushed drain � rack azlcl perfor��ted pipe. Boulde�-s could be encc.>untered�nd the��•r�r-eYCa��tion are�� shat�lcl be backfilled with e►-ushed rock anci eou��act�d in fc��ting ��reas. 1�'Ve Visited the 4 y � _ � � � � � � �ail Custorn Builders D � ,> .�, June 14, ?()12 ,,..,�,, � � �(�'�� Page 2 � a � TOWN OF VAIL � site an J�ui�e 11 and 13 r�� check on tlle basement dewatering prc�dx•ess. y ui�e ,, t Ie e�cavation dewatering subclrain trcnch had been completed and the basetnent are�i �vas relatively dry. Tl�e nattiral grav�l s�ils includin��tl�e cor��pacted excavation cletivater�ing drair� gravel �� sl�ould szippart an allowable 3,OU0 psfbearing pressure. T'he garage ac•ea should be � clesign.ed iai•a.n allowable 1,50t)psf bearing pressure. W�expect se�tlemen�s to be on the order of I inch and differential due to the different bearizig soils. The permanent � #�undation drain can be coinbined with the excavalion dewatering trench. The tu�der slab � gravei layer should have a�3ositive connection with the perimeter foundatiun drain. Other � recomznendations presented in the Koechlein report t11at are applicable slioulci also be observed. Tl�e recc�mmendatians subtnitted in this letter are based on vur observation of the sails exposed within the Fc>undatian excavation and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate the subsur�ace conditions t�-ithin the loaded depth of founc�ation intluence. This study is basecl on the assumption tllat soils beneath the fiootuibs have equal or better support than those ex��sed. The risk of faundation �nc�vecnent may be greatcr tha�i indic�ted in this report bec�tuse of po�sihle va�•iacions in the subsurface cozlditions. In a�•cler to reveal the nature and extent afvariations in the subsurface conditions below the excavatron, drilling would be reyuireci. lt is possible the data obtained l�y subsurface explorat�ioil cou(d ch�nge t�lle rec�>rninendations coutained in this letter. Out•services do not ii�clude determiniilg�the presence, prevention or possibility of�notd c�r other bi��logical �� co�ltalninants (.�VIOBC) developin� in the future. l�t the client is concerned abo�rt MC)}3C. �'� then a protessional in t11is special field ofpractice shauld be co��sulted. If you have any questions or nee;ci further assisfance, please call our of.fic.e. Sincerely, � i H�PWORTI-T P�1WL,^�K C, � � �� C,��ICAL> INC. .. �� ',„r, � �"'^`,, ��. '�� E w ��. �"a. �, � � � �.a Ste��e1Y [.�. PawZak, P.E. ��" - - � �, � Ap � t *,y SLYIIj� :,� �`J A � ��; � ,c::'°�, ..,'°»�;'' c�: Tl�e 1VIJ�Mueller Co. �ttn i�fark Mueller (m�r�(ciJir�'��,��itl) ��ttachment: Figure 1 --- Gradation Test Results _...___ _ �.._ _...._.. Job No. 1(2 051:1 __ __..._ G�t,.�tE'C�'1 � C f` � � �i c � , �. .. �. . � � : � • • � .•. •� ..-. . .•� � . 3 .� �� .� � �` �.�� . ' , : - . : �� w�� i�r� �sa�� r�� r �� M�� a��n.�� r�s��w�� r��.n�� _'��===��w��r�� r.�w��r..�w�� 1 �� —��==��i�� w��r��i�r�� 1 ��a..��w�� r��w�� r�� r��iw��w�� r�� w� ��r��.��'��nr� ��w��.r��'�� 1 ��rr��rr��w.��.�� oi�i. �i��rr��rr�� r��r��a.��w�� :1 ��a��rrr��w��i��rrr�� r1��i—A��a��I�r��r�� rw��r��w�wwr��rr�� .w��.�.��ww��.��+w�r.��w��r�� w�w��r w�� r��r��r�� rw��r��a��w��i�� r��i��.i� ��r��rr�� r�� '��r�� iwr��i��r�� Ir��s��l�l��11`��Iqlw�� A�-�r��w�� -�rrr� �r�� ir��\r��lr'�� 011lr�� I��I��i��r��1i��A�r �MI� �� A �I�1�� ir.��ir��r�� .1 1 ��r��w�� .�� r� ��r�r� ��r�� r��r��wr�� r��w��a��rr�� r��rr�� ' ��w�� r��.�� r��w��r��.��r�� ^�� 1 ��w��r��r��r�� i�� 1 w�� Y��Ir��-.��M��r�� w��a��w��w��r r� ��w�.��w��r��r� ��.r��r � ��r�� .�� . �� .1 ��r��rr�.��a�r�� r� �� w�� '1 �� r�•��w�� .�� rr►��w�� r��w��►�� .�w��ri�� w��rr� �� +��.��'�� .��w��r��r�� 1 ��. �.��.�� i�� N�-�� i�� r��I�r� ��rA i�� Illl��i�� i�� A�� a��-w��r� �� 1��i�'��r�� Iq��r��1��r�� ^1��1� 1 ��1�� I��i��1r1��1� �i�� r�� ` �� r��w��w�r�� r�� r�� •�� r�� r��w��w� �� •� ��r��r��w��r �� r�� .��.�� rr�� r��s�r�� i�� r�r��r�� r��r��ir�� i�� r �r ��`��A�� 1��1��Iw��I��a�� 11 �r��i��r�� w�� 11 1� 11 11ti � • 1 1 - 1 11 :11 • � � i • v� ��■��iv '- '• � � . �► � - � �� • • -• :. . . . . � ' �.0 �.� ' . � . • . - REScheck Software Version 4.4.4 Compliance Certificate � � Project Title: Diazayas Res. � l�� Energy Code: 2009 IECC `� Location: Vail,Colorado Construction Type: Single Family Project Type: New Construction Orientation: U nspeC ified Conditioned Floor Area: 4,144 ft2 Glazing Area Percentage: 23% Heating Degree Days: 9248 Climate Zone: 6 Permit Date: Construction Site: OwnerlAgent: Designer/Contractor: 1895 W.Gore Creek dr. Alex Diazayas Clinton Amundson Vail,CO 81657 Vail Custom Builders P.O.Box 2809 Edwards,CO 81632 970-904-0512 dinton@vailcustom.com . . ..• . Compliance: 12.6%Better Than Code Maximum UA: 499 Your UA:436 The%Better or Worse Than Code Index reflects how dose to compliance the house is based on code trade-off rules. It DOES NOT provide an estimate of energy use or cost rela6ve to a minimum-code home. Envelope Assemblies . . , , . � . . . Ceiling 1:Cathedral Ceiling 1,633 0.0 45.5 34 Wall 1:Wood Frame,16"o.c. 3,159 42.2 0.0 104 Orientation:Unspecified Window:1:Wood Frame,Oouble Pane 4 0.290 1 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Window:2a:Wood Frame,Double Pane 7 0.290 2 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Window:2b:Wood Frame,Double Pane � 0•290 2 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Window:3:Wood Frame,Double Pane 20 0.290 6 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Window:7:Wood Frame,Double Pane 10 0.290 3 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Window:8a:Wood Frame,Double Pane 16 0.290 5 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspeafied Project Title: Diazayas Res. Report date: 12/10/12 Data filename: C:\Users\CintonlDocuments\REScheck\Diazayas.rck Page 1 of 9 r . . . . . . � . . . Window:8b:Wood Frame,Double Pane 16 0.290 5 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Window:9:Wood Frame,Double Pane 4 0.290 1 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspeafied Window:10:Wood Frame,Double Pane 4 0.290 1 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Window: 11:Wood Frame,Double Pane 9 0.290 3 SHGC:0.19 I Orientation:Unspecified I Window:12:Wood Frame,Double Pane 20 0.290 6 I SHGC:0.19 �' Orientation:Unspecified I Window:13:Wood Frame,Double Pane 4 0.290 1 � SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Window: 14:Wood Frame,Doubie Pane 9 0.290 3 ', SHGC:0.19 � Orientation:Unspecified ' Window: 15:Wood Frame,Double Pane 14 0.290 4 ' SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Window: 16:Wood Frame,Double Pane 14 0.290 4 , SHGC:0.19 ' Orientation:Unspecified Window:17:Wood Frame,Double Pane 9 0.290 3 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified i Window:18:Wood Frame,Double Pane 9 0.290 3 j SHGC:0.19 �� Orientation:Unspecified ' Window:19:Wood Frame,Double Pane 16 0.290 5 ' SHGC:0.19 ' Orientation:Unspecified I �ndow:24:Wood Frame,Double Pane 4 0.290 1 ' SHGC:0.19 OrientaUOn:Unspecified i Window:25:Wood Frame,Double Pane 3 0.290 1 , SHGC:0.19 ', Orientation:Unspecified I Window:26:Wood Frame,Double Pane 3 0.290 1 I SHGC:0.19 � Orientation:Unspecified Window:27:Wood Frame,Double Pane 4 0.290 1 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Window:29:Wood Frame,Double Pane 8 0.290 2 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Window:30a:Wood Frame,Double Pane 4 0.290 1 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Window:30b:Wood Frame,Double Pane 4 0.290 1 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Window:30c:Wood Frame,Double Pane 4 0.290 1 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Project Title: Diazayas Res. Report date: 12/10/12 Data filename: C:\Users\Cinton\Documents\REScheck\Diazayas.rck Page 2 of 9 r N . . . , . . . . . . Window:31a:Wood Frame,Double Pane 16 0.290 5 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Window:31b:Wood Frame,Double Pane 16 0.290 5 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Door 1:Solid 21 0.500 11 Orientation:Unspecified Door:4:Glass 19 0.290 5 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Door.5:Glass 42 0.290 12 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspeafied Door:6:Glass 42 0.290 12 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Door:20:Glass 56 0.290 16 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Door:21:Glass 88 0.290 26 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Door:22:Glass 56 0.290 16 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Doo�:23:Giass 112 0.290 32 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Door:28:Glass 53 0.290 15 SHGC:0.19 Orientation:Unspecified Basement Wall 1:Solid Concrete or Masonry 1,155 10.0 0.0 76 Orientation:Unspecified Wall height:10.0' Depth below grade:9.0' Insulation depth:9.0' Compliance Statement: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans,specfications,and other calculaUons submitted with the permit applicabon.The proposed building has been designed to meet the 2009 IECC requirements in REScheck Version 4.4.4 and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the REScheck Inspection Checklist. � � h /�� '/�rn-c.c.nd�o!'� / a �Jec Zm/1 Clinton Signature Date Clinton Signature Date Clinton Signature Date Clinton Signature Date Project Title: Diazayas Res. Report date: 12/10/12 Data filename: C:\UserslCinton\Documents\REScheck\Diazayas.rck Page 3 of 9 r REScheck Software Version 4.4.4 Inspection Checklist Requirements: 35.0% were addressed directly in the REScheck software Text in the"Comments/Assumptions"column is provided by the user in the REScheck Requirements screen. For each requirement,the user certifies that a code requirement will be met and how that is documented,or that an exception is being claimed.Where compliance is itemized in a separate table,a reference to that table is provided. 2009 IECC Pre-Inspection/Plan Review Plans Verified Field Verified Complies? CommentslAssumptions Value Value 1032 Construction drawings and ❑Complies Requirement will be met. (PR1]' documentation demonstrate energy ❑Dces Not Comply �, code compliance for the building ❑Not Observable envelope. ❑Not Applicable 103.2, Construction drawings and ❑Complies 403.7 documentation demonstrate energy ❑Dces Not Comply [PR3]' code compliance for lighting and ❑Not Observable y� mechanical systems.Systems serving multiple dwelling units must ❑Not Applicable demonstrate compliance with the commercial code. 403.6 Heating and cooling equipment is Heating: Heating: ❑Complies [PR2]Z sized per ACCA Manual S based on Btu/hr Btu/hr ❑Dces Not Comply ,� Ioads per ACCA Manual J or other Cooling: Cooling: ❑Not Observable - approved methods. B�mr Btulhr ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Diazayas Res. Report date: 12/10/12 Data filename: C:\Users\Cinton\Documents\REScheck\Diazayas.rck Page 4 of 9 � 2009 IECC Foundation Inspection P�ans Verified Field Verified Complies? CommentslAssumptions Value Value 402.1.1 Conditioned basement wall insulation R- R- ❑Complies See the Envelooe Assemblies table for [F04]' R-value.Where interior insulation is ❑Dces Not Comply �alues. `�� used,verification may need to occur ❑Not Observable during Insulation Inspection.Not ❑Not Appiicable required in wartn-humid locations in Climate Zone 3. 303.2 Conditioned basement wali insulation ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [F05]' installed per manufacturePs ❑Dces Not Comply �, instructions. ❑Not Observable - ❑Not Applicable 402.2.7 Conditioned basement wall insulation ft ft ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies hable for [FO6]' depth of burial or distance ftom top of ❑Does Not Comply �alues. � wall. ❑Not Observable - ❑Not Applicable 303.2.1 A protective covering is installed to ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [F011)2 protect exposed exterior insulation ❑Dces Not Comply i and extends a minimum of 6 in.below ❑Not Observable i - 9��e• ❑Not Applicable 403.8 Snow-and ice-melting system ❑Complies [F012]2 controls installed. ❑Dces Not Comply �, ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: . 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Diazayas Res. Report date: 12/10/12 Data filename: C:\UserslCinton\Documents\REScheck\Diazayas.rck Page 5 of 9 � 20091ECC Framing 1 Rough-in Inspection P�ans Verified Field Verified Complies? Comments/Assumptions Value Value 402.1.1, Door U-faCtor. U- U- ❑Complies See the Envelove Assemblies table for 402.3.4 ❑Does Not Comply �alues. [FR1�' ❑Not Observable y, ❑Not Applicable 402.1.1, Glazing U-factor(area-weighted U- U- ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies table(or 402.3.1, average). ❑Dces Not Comply �alues. 402.3.3, ❑Not Observable 402.5 ❑Not Applicable �F�� d� 303.t.3 U-factors of fenestra6on products are �Complies Requirement will be met. [FR4]' determined in accordance with the ❑Dces Not Comply � NFRC test procedure or taken from ❑Not Observable - the default table. ❑Not Applicable 402.3.5 Sunrooms enclosing conditioned U- U- ❑Complies [FR8]' space have a maximum fenestration ❑Dces Not Comply �, U-factor of 0.50 in Climate Zones 4-8. ❑Not Observable - New glazing separating the sunroom ❑Not Applicable from conditioned space must meet code requirements. 402.3.5 Sunrooms enclosing conditioned U- U- ❑Complies [FR9]' space have a maximum skylight U- ❑Dces Not Comply �, factor of 0.75 in Climate Zones 4-8. ❑Not Observable - ❑Not Applicable 402.4.4 Fenestration that is not site built is ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [FR20]' listed and labeled as meeting ❑Dces Not Comply � AAMA/WDMAICSA 101/I.S.2/A440 or ❑Not Observable has infiltration rates per NFRC 400 ❑Not Applicable that do not exceed code limits. 402.4.5 IC-rated recessed lighting fixtures �Complies Requirement will be met. [FR16�z sealed at housin�nterior finish and ❑Dces Not Comply � labeled to indicate 2.0 cfm leakage at ❑Not Observable - 75 Pa. ❑Not Applicable 403.2.1 Supply ducts in attics are insulated to R- R- ❑Complies [FR12J' R-8.All other ducts in unconditioned R_ R_ ❑Dces Not Comply �, spaces or outside the building ❑Not Observable - envelope are insulated to R-6. ❑Not Applicable 403.2.2 All joints and seams of air ducts,air ❑Complies [FR13]' handlers,filter boxes,and building ❑Dces Not Comply b, cavities used as retum ducts are ❑Not Observable - sealed. ❑Not Applicable 403.2.3 Building cavkies are not used for ❑Complies [FR15J3 supply ducts. ❑Dces Not Comply ;� ❑Not Observable - ❑Not Applicable 403.3 HVAC piping conveying fluids above R- R- ❑Complies [FR17]2 105°F or chilled fluids below 55°F ❑Dces Not Comply are insulated to R-3. ❑Not Observable � �± ❑Not Applicable 403.4 Circulating service hot water pipes are R- R- �Complies [FR18]2 insulated to R-2. ❑Dces Not Comply ❑Not Observable �i ❑Not Applicable !403.5 Automatic or gravity dampers are ❑Complies Requirement will be met. i[FR19J2 installed on all outdoor air intakes and ❑Dces Not Comply exhausts. ❑Not Observable - ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Diazayas Res. Report date: 12/10/12 Data filename: C:\Users\Cinton\Documents\REScheck\Diazayas.rck Page 6 of 9 r 2009 IECC Insulation inspection P�ans Verified Field Verified Complies? CommentslAssumptions ; I Value Value i 303.1 All installed insulation is labeled or the ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [IN13J2 installed R-values provided. ❑Dces Not Comply �� ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.1.1, Wall insulation R-value.If this is a R- R- ❑Complies See the Envelone Assemblres table for 402.2.4, mass wall with at least'/z of the wall � yy�d � yy� ❑Dces Not Comply �alues. 402.2.5 insulation on the wall exterior,the � Mass � Mass ❑Not Observable [IN3]' exterior insulation requirement Not licable ,p applies. ❑ Steel � Steel ❑ APP� 303.2 Wall insulation is installed per ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [IN4]' manufacturers instructions. ❑Dces Not Comply �� ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.2.11 Sunroom wall insula6on has a R- R- ❑Complies [IN8)' minimum R-value of R-13.New walls ❑Does Not Comply � separating the sunroom from ❑Not Observable conditioned space must meet code requirements. ❑Not Applicable 303.2 Sunroom wall insulation installed per ❑Complies [IN9]' manufacturer's Instructions. ❑Dces Not Comply y� ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.2.11 Sunroom ceiling minimum insulation R- R- ❑Complies [IN10]' R-value of R-19 in Climate Zones 1-4, ❑Dces Not Comply � and R-24 in Climate Zones 5-8. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 303.2 Sunroom ceiling insulation is installed ❑Complies [IN11)' per manufacturers instructions. ❑Dces Not Comply d� ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Diazayas Res. Report date: 12/10/12 Data filename: C:\Users\Cinton\DocumentslREScheck\Diazayas.rck Page 7 of 9 � " Plans Verified Field Verified Complies? CommentslAssumptions 2009 IECC Final Inspection Provisions Value Value 402.1.1, Ceiling insulation R-value.Where>R- R- R- ❑Complies See the Fnvelove As�mblies table for 402.2.1, 30 is required,R-30 can be used if � W�d ❑ Wood ❑Dces Not Comply �alues. 402.2.2 insulation is not compressed at eaves. � Steel ❑ Steel ❑Not Observabie [FI1]' R-30 may be used for 500 ft2 or 20% ❑Not Applicable d, (whichever is less)where sufficient space is not available. 303.1.1.1, Ceiling insulation installed per �Complies Requirement will be met. 303.2 manufacturer's instr�ctions.Blown ❑Dces Not Comply [FI2]' insulation marked every 300 ft'. ❑Not Observable �, ❑Not Applicable 402.2.3 Attic access hatch and door insulation R- R- ❑Complies [FI3j� R-value of the adjacent assembly. ❑Dces Not Comply ❑Not Observable �' ❑Not Applicable 402.4.2, Building envelope tightness verified ACH 50= ACH 50= �Complies Requirement will be met. 402.4.2.1 by blower door test result of<7 ACH ❑Dces Not Comply [FI17]' at 50 Pa.This requirement may ❑Not Observable ky, instead be met via visual inspection, ❑Not Applicable - in which case verification may need to occur during Iruulation Inspection. 402.4.3 Wood-buming fireplaces have ❑Complies Exception:Requirement is not i[FI8]z gasketed doors and outdoor ❑Dces Not Comply applicable. I combustion air. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.2.2 Post construction dud tighfiess test cfrn cfm �Complies (F�4]' result of 8 cfm to outdoors,or 12 cfrn ❑Dces Not Comply �, across systems.Or,rough-in test ❑Not Observable result of 6 cfm across systems or 4 ❑Not Applicable cfrn without air handler.Rough-in test verification may need to occur during Framing Inspection. 403.1.1 Programmable thermostats installed ❑Complies [FI9]2 on forced air fumaces. ❑Dces Not Comply i ❑Not Observable , � '- ❑Not Applicable 4 3.1.2 Heat pump thermostat installed on ❑Complies [FI10]z heat pumps. ❑Dces Not Comply ❑Not Observable � ❑Not Applicable 403.4 Circulating service hot water systems ❑Complies [FI11)z have automatic or accessible manual ❑Dces Not Comply controls. ❑Not Observable " ❑Not Applicable 403.9.1 Readily accessible switch on heaters ❑Complies [FI12]3 for swimming pools. ❑Dces Not Comply � ❑Not Observable - ❑Not Applicable 403.9.2 Timer switches on pool heaters and ❑Complies [FI19]3 pumps are present. ❑Dces Not Comply ❑Not Observable �� ❑Not Applicable 403.9.3 Heated swimming pools have a cover. �Complies [FI20j3 Covers on pools heated over 90°F ❑Dces Not Comply `� are insulated to R-12. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 404.1 50%of lamps in permanent fixtures �Complies [FI6)' are high efficacy lamps. ❑Does Not Comply � ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 1 High Impact(1 ier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Diazayas Res. Report date: 12/10/12 Data filename: C:\Users\Cinton\Documents\REScheck\Diazayas.rck Page 8 of 9 � 2009 IECC Final Inspection Provisions P�ans Verified Field Verifed Complies? CommentslAssumptions Value Value , i 401.3 Compliance certificate posted. ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [FI�2 ❑Dces Not Comply �{, ❑Not Observable - ❑Not Applicable I 303.3 Manufacturer manuals for mechanical ❑Complies [FI18]3 and water heating equipment have ❑Dces Not Compiy �� been provided. ❑Not Observable - ❑Not Applicable Additional CommentslAssumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) i Project Title: Diazayas Res. Report date: 12/10/12 Data filename: C:\Users\Cinton\Documents\REScheck\Diazayas.rck Page 9 of 9 � 2009 IECC Energy Efficiency Certificate . . Wall 42.17 Floor 10.00 Ceiling/Roof 45.47 Ductwork(unconditioned spaces): � .. . Window 0.29 0.19 Door 0.29 0.19 . .. . . - Heating System: Cooling System: Water Heater• Name: G�`n�vt ��,,.��,,�qr�.Date: 7 a ,0 eC �Z Comments: i F� CC) \��CIt1�I.I /�Ca . . . �ve�r� � �� q.f'sa/6�f ��. . � Hegi 300 Telefon +41 (0)56 443 12 15 info@wernli-fensterbau.ch Fenst�r-und Holzbau CH-5112 Thalheim Fax +41 (0)55 443 28 68 www.wemli-fensterbau.ch , - I I.ambda / icke mm '(R�herE[R'/�K] �Scluchten i Baastoffe(�on maee nach aaBen} __ �.__ .i. ___ �-� __ � . �_ I. . .-. - . II___"__� Standard Putz � ' rv�— ��— _0 006 -- � �, __ —--- - -��—�- � - ' __ _ --� � j��, _ �l—___7 Gi skaROn Iatten DIN 181809QQ kglm° � � y,��t 75 0•� _ P_ _P ...�.._._._._. _ _._.... ..._ - .------- � i C—� Spanpiatten und DSB-Platten '� � 4 73 ; 75 i � 011� Ji __ .- _.. !..-- - ------' � Mmeralwol[e M1'IW DIN EN 13162035 � ! Uff35 ' 160 4.57I • _..__ ._ .._ __._ -- -- - - - --- �' � � Hoi�aserdammstoft WF DIN EN 131710.035 !� ; �35. ..: � � � �'S�I _ � .._. - ----- . .. _ _.._ _ _� —____--� �j _ Nadelhotz � J 13 ', � 25 —__� 6•192 I _ __ _ _� _ . -- — � . r � � I 7� �' � __j �--' _—! �----�� _..-- — '+(�� (��; �� R'Srmenbergan�skceS¢ient(mnen nnd aaBen) __ll___. -. ___. �L_ ___� a.74 ----� --- --_--- -------------- ---__ � Samme_ ; 240 ' S 6� _ ..� I _ � __ - __i I._ ->.---..-i ----_. _____..------------__ - - _ ........J __U_R�'ert: _ � 0.18 .__ -'.._.._�Y/m'K _�.._i � Neu ' Achhmg.vm aea L-R«c-Rxlm«t�zw zu koffie�bmoti3m s�Ja�asc�t zon�cl� �� c�� vor� I�`�1�//'t t�I � ��' /��,,'� z � : ,�o, ./� . � ,� � S�. �s� � �� - _ -� � � �t� �� . � :�� Clinton Amundson From: Balz Arrigoni [Balz@arrigoniwoods.com] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 9:48 AM To: Clinton Amundson Cc: ted@vailcustom.com Subject: RE: yes ARRiGONI ��'40D� Balz Arrigoni PO Box 3125 � Vail,CO 81658 p.970-479-1800 � f.970-479-1818 balz@arri�oniwoods.com � www.arri�oniwoods.com Showroom&Shipping Address: 23698 N Hwy 24 C2-4 � Minturn,CO 81645 �Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Clinton Amundson [mailto:clinton@vailcustom.com] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 9:47 AM To: Balz Arrigoni Cc: tedC�vailcustom.com Subject: RE: Balz your telling me that the exterior wall system is a R-42.17? From: Balz Arrigoni [mailto:Balz@arrigoniwoods.com) Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 7:11 AM To: Clinton Amundson Subject: Hello Clinton Here is the math for the R Value.42. Tx Balz ARRIGONI V1fOODS Balz Arrigoni PO Box 3125 � Vail,CO 81658 p.970-479-1800 � f.970-479-1818 balz@arrigoniwoods.com � www.arrigoniwoods.com Showroom&Shipping Address: 23698 N Hwy 24 C2-4 � Minturn,CO 81645 �Please consider the environment before printing this email. 1 I �y�12 ACFoam�Nail Base LTTR�Atlas Roofing Corporation Products Libratvs Tods 8 SsMces Where To Buy Co►Paate Cartact Nailable Insulatlo�r � aCFoam�a CrossVeni�� ACFoamC�CrossVentOO B ACFoam�g Nail Base L Atlas Nail Base Fastener ( LT'fR IUNabN hsWatlao RNaYd T. T°p"' LTTR Values: ACFoam�Nailbase ❑ca�at�,e � FA�'s in 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3. 4.0 4.5 5.0 Where To Buy mm 38 51 64 76 89 102 114 127 Case Studies Retum on hvestrtent ' LTTR Values` 6.6 9.8 12.7 15.9 19.1 22.9 25.8 28J � L�Oedits RSI" 1.16 1.69 2.24 2.8 3.36 3.92 4.51 5.05 Vendation Ca�ulators pieces Per Padcage 31 23 18 15 13 11 10 9 Cortrrercial Service Pblicy yp. �.; ,,. ,.r Square Feet Per Padcage 992 736 576 480 416 352 320 288 `� � WNaMs�nsul�oon wlard 'Long-term thermal resistance values o�the/oam Neie determined in accordance with CANNLGS770 and ASTM Products: C 1289-02,Annex A1.All test samples Mere Ihird-party selected and tested b y an accredited materials testing Tecnn�-�is 6,y�neerEo laboratory.7he R-vafue of.551or7/16 in.OSB ues piovided byAPA-The Engineered Woad AssociaSon,wfiich venciiat�on cited ASHRAE Handbook,Fundamentals. � R means resistance to heat flow The higher�e R-value,fhe greater the insuladng po�+er.Compa2 insulation Rvor Sningles 8 values before you buy.To get lhe � Accessories marked R-va�ue,it is essen6al that tliis insuladon be installed pmperly. Poyiso Raof hsulatfon Tapered Fblyiso Poof "RS!is the meVic expiession ofLTTR(m2•ICM�) hsulatbn .. Pdyiso Roofing Insulatio�Standards To Incorporate Additional Procedures for Measuring Long December3,2012 Term Thertnal Resistance(LTTR) Upgrade The Job.Upgrade Atlas Mnounces The New Tapered Services Group The Protection. Vancouver Polyiso Manufacturing Facility! �� D/� �y��y I � ,�...7�F-1 PS LJ �"�..�' 11'S��f v,�, ,.. .`��V� � � Need help with a Tapered Insulation . project?Contad FWas,we pn assist 'n �-.�E. with all your Tapered Insula6on needs. High Perfortnance Engineered This portal will gi�e yau valuabte Underlayment for the same price per infortna6on about ihe produds we square as#30 Feltl afFer,installation details,and our brand M�� The leading polyiso manutadurer in new on-line Quote Request! North America is now the'Go-To' M�� insulation proHder in tlie Padfic Northwest Greater cooerage means greater s ervice. INwe. �nra� �rauowasnr wuarasa i:w�.....� YOU �' rotlt� �About Atlas�Atlas News I Marketing Support�Atias Careers I Atlas Events�FAC's�Terms 8 Condkions� 02012 AtWs Roafeg Capore[lon-NI R�hte Reservatl ��` www.aUasroofing.comltabbed.php?section ur1=58&tab=5 �� 2�3��2 ACFoarr�N LTTR�Atlas Roofing Corporation Products LJtereture Tods 8 Serviees W here To Bty Co►Pc►ate Cartact ' � � �� Polyiso Insulalion � ` V� v ACFoamt?�-II � `� �:' + � � �� ACFoam@-III _ �� • � ACFoamOO-IV �1�, � � L� � � � ✓ �, � ACFoamCa-HS CoverBoard �� ACFoamG Composi[e/FB . . . � . � � � � LTTR ACFoamCa Composi[e/PB ACFoamC Composite/GB �TTR Values Chart: ACFOaR1��II ACFoamOO Supreme �.� I in mm in mm 6.0 1.0 25.40 1.06 48 2.625 66.68 Pd�1so I�ndanon Related 9.0 1.5 38.10 1.58 32 4.375 111.13 7op�es: 12.1 2.0 50.8 2.13 24 4.375 111.13 15.3 2.5 63.50 2.69 19 4.375 �»•�3 �.r., ... .. 78.5 3.0 7620 3.26 16 4.375 111.13 FAGI's 19.1 3.1 78.74 3.36 15 4.375 111.13 hdusiry Links 20.4 3.3 83.82 3.59 14 4.375 ��•�3 Where To euy �+25.0 .0 101.60 4.40 12 4.375 ��3 � Case Studies 7ools 8 Services LTTR(long-term tliemral resistance)values were determined in accordance with CAN/ULC-S770-3.All test samples�+ere�iid-party selected and tested 6 y an accredited material testing laboratory.The LTTRE"resulGs we� Return on hvestment rieviewed and au�orized 6y FM€Approvals and cer0�fied by the PIMA€'Quality Merk Program. L�Qedits Atlas recommends mu15-layering wlien desired insulaSon thicknesses are greater lhan 2.7 in. Cormiercial Service FbNcy •RSI is U�e me6ic expression o/R-value(m2•ICllh�. � , .,- Pdyisolmulatloa Relaeed Positive Low Slope Roof Drainage Extends Membrane Life December3,2012 Products: Taperr;!��>,ly�so R�of In�.a l�:t,-�.� � Naaab��f�,5�� Upgrade The Job.Upgrade Atlas Mnounces The New Tapered Services roup The Protection. Vancouver Polyiso wy�sowarnsu�ation Manufacturing Facility! Polystyrene hsutation � Slipsheets fl � � uAao Foam Facers ■�,►7Y!� �✓ ��"�7�wi r �� v ar.-��... f � � '�Z Need help with a Tapered Insulation ` i projecC?Contact Pilas,we can assist witli all your Tapered Insulafion needs. High Pertormance Engineered This portal will gi�,e you valuable Undedaymentforthe same pnce per informadon aboutthe producLs we square as#30 Felt! ofter,installation details,and our brand More a The leading polyiso manufacWrer in new on-line Quote Request! North America is now tlie°Go-To" Mwe• insula6on provider in the Pacific Norlhwest Greater coverage means greater senice. More s � :. �factbook � ' racmrusar w�iarusar YOU �' rou n� t/2 �tlasroofing.comltabbed.php?section_ur1=16&tab=5 Y� � I J ll � D ��S3 11-14-2013 Inspection Request Reporting Page 8 4:10 qm Vail,-CQ-��tX.-Qf - Requested Inspect Date: Friday November 15 2013 Site Address: 1895 C;ORE CREEK l�R VAIL A/P/D Information Activity: B12-0049 Type: COMBO Sub Type: ASFR Status: CR REQD Const Type: Occupancy: Use: R-3 Insp Area: Owner: DIAZAYAS,ALEJANDRO Architect: SHEPHERD RESOURCES, INC. Phone: 949-3302 Contractor: VAIL CUSTOM BUILDERS Phone: 970-904-0512 Description: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Requested Insuection(s) Item: 534 PLAN-FINAL C/O Requested Time: 08:30 AM Requestor: Phone: Comments: 904-0512 Assigned To: GRUTHER Entered By: MHAEBERLE K Action: Time Exp: � � ��,,,,,,,� � I• 1 �b� � Item: - INAL C/O Requested Time: 04:30 PM Requestor: Phone: Comments: 904-0512 Assigned To: JMONDRAGON Entered By: MHAEBERLE K Action: Time Exp: Comment: riveway excee s allowable grade.No ina rom W until resolved. Inspection Historv Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING "Approved'" 06/19/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED Comment: soils report in faserfiche ufer ground installed at SW coner of garage 08/21/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED Comment: pads in front Item: 20 BLDG-Foundation/Steel "Approved" 06/27/12 Inspector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED Comment: 08/20/12 Inspector: MDENNEY Action: AP APPROVED Comment: W ING WALL AND 2 COLUMNS. Item: 21 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan "Approved'" 09/14/12 Inspector: bgibson Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 22 PLAN-ILC FRAMING **App roved" 11/21/12 Inspector: bgibson Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 120 ELEC-Rough *'Approved" 06/06/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: Temp electric meter release for construction power 10/17/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: Electrical service 11/14/12 Inspector: sgremmer Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 200 MECH-Rough *'Approved" 07/19/12 Inspector: JRM Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: in floor heat garage slab and lower level only 100#air test 10/25/12 Ins ector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED Comment: IN�LOOR HEAT COMPLETE 100#AIR TEST 11/06/12 Ins�pector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED Comment: DRYER DUCT, BATH FANS AND KITCHEN RANGE APPROVED REPT131 Run Id: 14653 I NOTE: TH/S PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBS/TE AT ALL TIMES , �• �� Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 • : , • : � . Job Address: Location......: Parcel No....: 1895 GORE CREEK DR VAIL 210312306025 OWNER DIAZAYAS, ALEJANDRO 03/16/2012 C/O DAN WOLF 953 S FRONTAGE RD, STE 222 VAI L CO 81657 ARCHITECT SHEPHERD RESOURCES, INC PO BOX 1624 AVON CO 81620 License: C000002193 APPLICANT VAIL CUSTOM BUILDERS PO BOX 2809 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: C000003221 CONTRACTOR VAIL CUSTOM BUILDERS PO BOX 2809 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: C000003221 Description: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Permit #: B12-0049 Project #: PRJ 11-0453 03/16/2012 Phone: 949-3302 03/16/2012 Phone: 970-904-0512 03/16/2012 Phone: 970-904-0512 Occupancy: R-3 Type Construction: VB Applied.....: 03/16/2012 Issued. . . : 11 /20/2012 Valuation: $850,000.00 ................................................................................. FEE SUMMARY ............................................................................... Building Permit -----------> $4,896.25 Bldg Plan Check ----------> $3,182.56 Use Tax Fee-----------------------> $16,800.00 Electrical Permit ---------> $391.00 Elec Plan Check -----------> $254.15 Restuarant Plan Review--------> $0.00 Mechanical Permit ------> $740.00 Mech Plan Check ---------> $185.00 Additional Fees--------------------> $O.00Plumbing Permit --------> $375.00 Plmb Plan Check ---------> $93.75 Recreation Fee--------------------> $693.90 Investigation-----------------------> $0.00 Will Call------------------------------> $20.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES--------------> $27,851.61 Payments-------------------------------> $27,851.61 BALANCE DUE------------------------> $0.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DECLARATIONS I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM. combination permit_012811 � �' � � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF Permit #: B12-0049 Owner: DIAZAYAS, ALEJANDRO Cond: CON0012534 An agreement, approved by the Town Attorney, will be required to be executed prior to any temporay C/O releasing the Town of all liability and maintenance of proposed "cobble swale" if any storm water is diverted from the drainage easement to the swale. Cond: 53 (FIRE 2007) Monitored fire sprinkler system required and shall comply with NFPA 13 (2007) and VFES Standards. Cond: 52 (FIRE 2002) Monitored fire alarm system required and shall comply with NFPA 72 (2002 ed.) and VFES Standards combination permit_012811 Address: 1895 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Location: � � * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES Permit #: B12-0049 Owner: DIAZAYAS, ALEJANDRO Address: 1895 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Location: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Item: 00010 BLDG-FOOTING 06/19/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments: soils report in laserfiche ufer ground installed at SW coner of garage 08/21/2012 By: sgremmerAction: AP Comments: pads in front Item: 00020 BLDG-Foundation/Steel 06/27/2012 By: JRM Action: AP 08/20/2012 By: MDENNEY Action: AP Comments: WING WALL AND 2 COLUMNS. Item: 00021 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan 09/14/2012 By: bgibson Action: AP Item: 00022 PLAN-ILC FRAMING Item: 00110 ELEC-Service Item: 00120 ELEC-Rough 06/06/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Temp electric meter release for construction power 10/17/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Electrical service 11/14/2012 By: sgremmerAction: AP Item: 00200 MECH-Rough 07/19/2012 By: JRM Action: PI Comments: in floor heat garage slab and lower level only 100 # air test 10/25/2012 By: JRM Action: AP Comments: IN FLOOR HEAT COMPLETE 100 # AIR TEST 11/06/2012 By: JRM Action: AP Comments: DRYER DUCT, BATH FANS AND KITCHEN RANGE APPROVED Item: 00210 PLMB-Underground 07/13/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Item: 00230 PLMB-Rough/Water 11/13/2012 By: JRM Action: AP Item: 00240 PLMB-Gas Piping 10/10/2012 By: JRM Action: PI Comments: 10 # air test from main to outer wall of house. no interior gas piping done as of this inspection Item: 00310 MECH-Heating Item: 00315 PLMB-Gas Piping Item: 00410 Special Inspect-progress rept Item: 00030 BLDG-Framing Item: 00050 BLDG-Insulation Item: 00060 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail Item: 00070 BLDG-Misc. 10/25/2012 By: JRM Action: PI Comments: REVIEWED AND APPROVED U VALUE LABELS OF ALL GLAZING. combination permit_012811 .29 APPROVED OK TO REMOVE LABELS Item: 00190 ELEC-Final Item: 00290 PLMB-Final Item: 00390 MECH-Final Item: 00420 Special Inspect-final rept Item: 00025 PW-Rough grade Item: 00091 PW-Final driveway grade Item: 00501 PW-Access/Staging/Erosion Item: 00532 PW-TEMP. C/O Item: 00539 PW-FINAL C/O Item: 00090 BLDG-Final combination permit_012811 F*#***#*####******########**#**###*******######******#####***##*#######***#####**##**####### TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement �***�**�*****r**��********«******s*****s***********�**r**�**r****�*�****�*�*******��** Statement Number: R120001898 Amount: $110.00 11/20/201210:49 AM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: LC Notation: credit card from Clinton Amundson, Vail Custom Builders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B12-0049 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT ' Parcel No: 2103-123-0602-5 Site Address: 1895 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Location: Total Fees: $27,851.61 This Payment: $110.00 Total ALL Pmts: $27,851.61 Balance: $0.00 **********�*�***�***************s********s*******�********��**********************��******* ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code -------------------- PF 00100003112300 Description Current Pmts ------------------------------ ------------ PLAN CHECK FEES 110.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road ��'�' Vail, CO 81657 ��i� �� r��. �.: , -� Te1: 970.479.2128 ,�_ ' .� ;--� _. www.vailgov.com � � ' Development Review Coordinator TRANSMITTAL FORM Use this form when submitting additional information for planning applications or buiiding permits. This form is also used for requesting a revision to building permits. A two hour minimum building review foo .,f �� n will he r.haraed uoon reissuance of the permit. ApplicationlPermit #(s) information applies to: �?/�/Z � �� -y(�� .I.;"U��.' Attention: �Revisions �� Response to Correction Letter a �_attached copy of correction letter � Deferred Submittal � � Other Project Street Address: �� „�_ G-or�- � r�� k �r. (Number) (Street} (Suite #) Building/Complex Name: Applicant Information (architect, contractor, owner/owner's rep) ✓ C- � Contact Name: G/� /� / tJ C1 � i�C. /�h Address: �'• .�- ��%� Z' �To / City ��✓�I��State: C� Zip: �c Z Contact Name: G �� "/ ��%%! /T'h'l Vi�'1 .�OL+ Contact Phone: / �� —/✓ `7 � � � ��' ContactE-MaiI:C��N�I'1 4� 1�4.L e�Ct-SiD� . G A `V� I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to ' comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved, International Building and Resid ntlal Codes and other ordi of the T wn ap lic X Owner/Owner's Representative Signature (Required) For Office Use Only: �e ��a: Received From: Cash OC: �/sa / MC Last 4 CC # Authorization # Chedc # exp. date: Description of Transmittal/ List of Changes, Items Atfached: 5�r�.c�..-m� �I/'.'v'rS��as �-��i � Z ��.�.� 2v/Z k.i�'+� �/G �S /lOI�S / h S/�CfL. r2�� 3 (use additional sheet if necessary) Building Permits: Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building: Plumbing: Electrical: Mechanical: Total: Date Received: t � �� $ $0 - ---- ------- ---- - -------- ----- ----- l��-,��1� 1"� � �Q�t p 5 20i 1�:�oP�, � �oWN OF VAIL H � HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 2 �-c�v �-� 5020 County Road 154 Glernvood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hnaeo�Dhoaeobech.com REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT Ciient: Vail Custom Builders Job No.: 112 051A Day: Monday Attn: Clinton Amundson Date: 1115/12 P.O. Box 2809 Page: 1 of 1 Edwards, Colorado 81632 Project: Lot 26, Vail Village West, Filing 2,1895 West Gore Creek Drive, Vail, Colorado Area of Inspection: Exterior Epoxy Anchors Reference Documents S5 — MJ Mueller Used: .-- __.___ _ ______._ Inspection Notes: 6" embedment,'/." diameter Observed'/s" diameter holes drilled. Observed holes cleaned, epoxy verified, and observed bolt installation. Inspection Status: ❑ Preliminary � Finai � Reinforcement as noted above was judged to be in reasonable conformance with the referenced construction documents. ❑ Exceptions Noted: _ _ _----- ___ ._____ __._._--- _ _ -- _ _ _�__ . Verbal Clinton Amundson with Vail Custom Builders Communication: Distribution: Vail Custom Builders — Clinton Amundson (cli�ton�ivailcustom.com ) Joe Benedict Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES .� �ow��vnII. • Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Permit #: B12-0049 Job Address: Location......: Parcel No....: 1895 GORE CREEK DR VAIL 210312306025 OWNER DIAZAYAS, ALEJANDRO 03/16/2012 C/O DAN WOLF 953 S FRONTAGE RD, STE 222 VAI L CO 81657 ARCHITECT SHEPHERD RESOURCES, INC PO BOX 1624 AVON CO 81620 License: C000002193 APPLICANT VAIL CUSTOM BUILDERS 03/16/2012 Phone: 970-904-0512 PO BOX 2809 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: C000003221 CONTRACTOR VAIL CUSTOM BUILDERS PO BOX 2809 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: C000003221 Project #: PRJ11-0453 Applied.....: 03/16/2012 Issued. . . : 05/23/2012 03/16/2012 Phone:949-3302 Description: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 03/16/2012 Phone: 970-904-0512 Occupancy: R-3 Type Construction: VB Valuation: $850,000.00 •tf1rt44RYlYrtf4t�k4tiF#�filf#YitfYf'R4�k'kYff444�f4444t�fflf/filitlei}fflfR#*X4+Yff4lRi4fdfff FEE SUMMARY •••,,,••••••••••••••,•,,,••••,,••,•,,,•••,••••••••,•••••••«•,•,••,••,••,•,,, Building Permit ---------> $4,896.25 Bldg Plan Check --------> $3,182.56 Use Tax Fee-------------------> $16,800.00 Electrical Permit -----> $391.00 Elec Plan Check -------> $254.15 Restuarant Plan Review--------> $0.00 Mechanical Permit ----> $740.00 Mech Plan Check -----> $185.00 Additional Fees-----------------> $0.00 Plumbing Permit --------> $375.00 Plmb Plan Check -------> $93.75 Recreation Fee------------> $693.90 Investigation-----------> $0.00 Will Call--------------- > $20.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES---------> a27,741.61 Payments------_m�________�--> a27,741.61 BALANCE DUE----------------> 50.00 .................................................•__..,,,.___.,..,.....,.,,,......,.,.,,....,.,......,,,,._.._.,...._,...........,......,,,.,.....:..,..,....._...,,.,........,....,..,_ DECLARATIONS I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM. combination permit_012811 �l� ....................................................«............,...........,.,,..,...,.,....,,,,,,....,.......................,,....,.,,,..,,.,.....,,,,.,....,,,,..,...,.,...,,... CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF Permit #: B12-0049 Owner: DIAZAYAS, ALEJANDRO Address: 1895 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Location: 1r1rtHVlrYiRffffTiktlt4##HrfAAtlfwRlrffYYttfrihfY`fiYttk#4�N+t1rRA�ARRfrVRRffff�HYitfffYlYt#tlf4tt}!#fHM#f}1r1R V4/LTV rtY'iF4tf�Hrflf4f'frRR1rVR�tRffRT44tRf4f1rM1}�l4f'ftwxfifriRRfrtrrttRf4fftf�dfrff/RR4fxtVxf Cond: CON0012534 An agreement, approved by the Town Attorney, will be required to be executed prior to any temporay C/O releasing the Town of all liability and maintenance of proposed "cobble swale" if any storm water is diverted from the drainage easement to the swale. Cond: 53 (FIRE 2007) Monitored fire sprinkler system required and shall comply with NFPA 13 (2007) and VFES Standards. Cond: 52 (FIRE 2002) Monitored fire alarm system required and shall comply with NFPA 72 (2002 ed.) and VFES Standards combination permit_012811 T�wNOF V�I� .*..*„*********�*,*,.*****,,.****.**********.,,.,*..*,**..,,,*.*****.*..**.**.�**.*....****.*******...**.***.****.****......,,.*********�**.***,,.**., REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES Permit #: 612-0049 Owner: DIAZAYAS, ALEJANDRO Address: 1895 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Location: *.*,�....««..,,«*.****...,►**««„********.,**�**,..**..*,..,..*****.****.*««.,**�.*.**,*,.,..*«*****.�«**....,,*«*««,..**�**...*.*..«„*««*«*.******�.*...,««,..*«*# Item: 00010 BLDG-FOOTING 06/19/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments: soils report in laserfiche ufer ground installed at SW coner of garage 08/21/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments: pads in front Item: 00020 BLDG-Foundation/Steel 06/27/2012 By: JRM Action: AP 08/20/2012 By: MDENNEY Action: AP Comments: WING WALL AND 2 COLUMNS. Item: 00021 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan Item: 00022 PLAN-ILC FRAMING Item: 00110 ELEC-Service Item: 00120 ELEC-Rough 06/06/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Temp electric meter release for construction power Item: 00200 MECH-Rough 07/19/2012 By: JRM Action: PI Comments: in floor heat garage slab and lower level only 100 # air test Item: 00210 PLMB-Underground 07/13/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Item: 00230 PLMB-Rough/Water Item: 00240 PLMB-Gas Piping Item: 00310 MECH-Heating Item: 00315 PLMB-Gas Piping Item: 00410 Special Inspect-progress rept Item: 00030 BLDG-Framing Item: 00050 BLDG-Insulation Item: 00060 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail Item: 00070 BLDG-Misc. Item: 00190 ELEC-Final Item: 00290 PLMB-Final Item: 00390 MECH-Final Item: 00420 Special Inspect-final rept Item: 00025 PW-Rough grade Item: 00091 PW-Final driveway grade Item: 00501 PW-Access/Staging/Erosion Item: 00532 PW-TEMP. C/O Item: 00539 PW-FINAL C/O Item: 00090 BLDG-Final combination permit_012811 Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road T0144IN CE O Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970.479.2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator TRANSMITTAL FORM Use this form when submitting additional information for planning applications or building permits This form is also used for requesting a revision to building permits. A two hour minimum building review fee of $110 will be charged upon reissuance of the permit. Application /Permit #(s) information applies to: J3 12 Attention: 2 SILL -- - - -- --------------------------- --- - - - - -- --- ------------------------------------------ � ( Revisions 0 Response to Correction Letter ❑_attached copy of correction letter Deferred Submittal =LC Other - ---------------------------- - - - - -- Project Street Address: (Number) (Stree (Suite #) Building /Complex Name: Description of Transmittal/ List of Changes, Items Attached: Applicant Information ✓Ca.Z-- en-Gc5-6!"% ��•I�C (architect, contractor, owner /owner's reap) Contact Name: cf� A �'7 7LOA Address: p, r% • 130,K- o- �B City jP /5 State: C D Zip: Contact Name: G l / /1 / ,9!1 Apt L, nWW - ,o .1 (use additional sheet if necessary) Contact Phone: 7 n 7 � �`�y � � f Z Building Permits: Contact E- Mail: �� n f //� ✓G• Z c c-,f7f ^ •original cOti• Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor &Materials) 3 i (DO NOT include original valuation) hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out i Building: $ in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to Plumbing: $ comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according i Electrical: $ to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ; Mechanical: $ ordinan es of the Town applicable there Total: $ B Owner /Owner's Representative Signature (Required) For Office Use Only: Fee Paid: Received From: Cash CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Authorization # Check # exp. date: Date Received: D � NOV 2 .0 2012 10 1 (f S->9ry� TOWN OF VAIL ''T'T� DepartmenY of Community Devefopment Fs::::: ::::::... �'��'t: 75 South Frontage Road <: 1:;. ::: Vail,CO 89657 ��Jg�E� �1' �.jA..�L �'. Tel: 970.4792128 www_vaiigov.com Development Review Coordinator TRANSM ITTAL F�R1V] • Use this fo�m when submitting additional information for planning applications or building permits. This form is also used for requesting a revision to building.permits. A two.hour minimum building review fee of$110 will be charged upon reissuance of the permit. --------------------------------------------------- Application/Permit#(s) information applies �o: Attention: evisions —^ � sponse to Correction Letter ��I Z _ V,�� „ �_attached copy of correction letter �Deferred Submittal p '�'II�'.[�(„� .JC3 (�Other __/ � 6/ Project Street Address: / ��5 1,✓��- G-�- �r��k t7 r, (Number) (Street� (Suite#) Building/Complex Name: Description of Transmittal/l�st of Changes, Items At4ached: 1�5�� l�r� �ve�,✓�.� �.pplicant Information / f��2.Yt'�.l �/�f�- ��✓ (architect,contractor,ownerlowner's rep) �� / s/ �( s h i � - Contact Name:�� M �Y� TTl'�'��K O�O�- Address:� �} ��X � g�� City ��1.✓�'`�S State: f� Z�p: �!��Z j � , Contact Name: l� �•I1 ��'l �� 1 ��' (use additional sheet if necessary) i J �)rJ��D� 'O �i --- ----_=_=__-�___-___- -- -=�_�-__�------_�:-:____=__-_=_-_-- Cantact Phone: � Building Permits: � / Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor&Materials) Contact E-Mail:C-� ►1� � �4�h C�j�"''��' (DO NOT include original valuation) I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out Building: � in full the information required,completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correcti I agree to p�umbing: � comply with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according Electrical: � to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved,International Building and Residential Codes and other Mechanical: � ordin nces of the Town applica6le th � TotaL• $� Owne wner's Representative Signature(Required) ---�----�---�-�---�---"��-"------�------"�""--�"�"-�-�-�---�� Date Received D � � � a �n � V JUL 2 5 2013 For O�ce U se O nly: Fee Paid: *' Received From: TOW!V �F VA'L �� Check# CC: V sa I MC Last 4 CC# exp.date: Authori�tion#