The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDRB120074 Conceptual Plans Department of Community Development 0 75 South Frontage Road TOWN OF VAIL` Vail, co 81x57 Tel: 970-479-2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator Application for Design Review Conceptual Review General Information: A conceptual review may be requested by an applicant where new construction or ma- jor changes are to occur on a property. A conceptual review does not serve as a final approval and an addi- tional application is required for final review. The conceptual review is intended to allow the applicant to intro- duce the project to the Design Review Board and receive comments. The DRB does not vote on conceptual reviews. Fee: $0 9 Single Family F Duplex Multi-Family F Commercial Description of the Request: V-0'P- New e-,6110VVN IZFt 9��E Physical Address: -10 l 03" F r— Q4-- 9,'Q. Parcel Number: (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Property Owner: T>0 uG w Mailing Address: C_W kUevS lw}�+-n��r. � 15210 M"1% S+f (6�° s•« C rrA o Phone: I - Q/3 • 4e+ 144 4 7 Owner's Signature: Primary Contact/ Owner Repres ntative: S'co-t'T t. tyAr-ypt"E�"� Pi R Mailing Address: p•0 • ROX 3366 CIA (_e co• 8i(.,31 Phone: 6H C ' '2)X-1 3°10� �^ahher� tea.Govt Fax: o��°' 329 • 3�° E-mail: b (��, For Office Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa/MC Last 4 CC# Exp. Date: Auth# Check# Fee Paid: Received From: Meeting Date: DRB No.: Planner: Project No: Zoning: Land Use: Location of the Proposal: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Property Information Property Address c r—�rlt1rt'¢ C Ap Parcel# Legal Description WT 1 jE:x.%0V—)L Z IN L EWIEk2 $v?,:,'C>I v IS 1 0 N Development Site Area sq ft %ce& acres p` 0 buildable sq �� 2 ft Zone District/SDD# Hazard Zones Snow Avalanche High Severity Moderate Severity N/A Sections 12-21&14-7 Debris Flow High Flow QModerate Flow High Avalanche N/A Rockfoll aigh Severity Medium Severity N/A Excessive Slopes >_30% N/A Floodplain 100 year floodplain QFloodway nwetlands N/A Creeks,Streams Gore Creek an site Uadjacent to site N/A Section 12-14-17 _Other tributary: ®on site ®adjacent to site &/A Project Information Project Description I(.r rw Development Standards Allowed Existing Proposed Gross Residential Floor Area Primary sq ft S,2G1.y S�ZG l y (maximum) Secondary sq ft Chapter 12-15 EHU sq ft TOTAL sq ft C; IL(101, � S� 2(i�•� ®250 Addition Onterior Conversion Credits: Goo (� G91"GC 00 4vy-%EID Setbacks(minimum) Front ft '2,0 1 Section 14-10-4 Side ft LS Side ft Rear ft r Watercourse ft Site Coverage(maximum) a o see definition Section 12-2-2 Building Height(maximum) Sloping ft see definition Section 12-2-2 Flat ft Landscaping Softscape sq ft Cs� See definition Section 14-2-1 Section 14-10-8 Hardscape sq ft 5 cc TOTAL sq ft Driveway Max Curb-cuts ,( Sections 14-3-1&14-3-2 Max Grade @ cen- terline Min Width Heated drive? N 0 Oyes No ®Yes No Snow Storage% 010 Parking #Enclosed Spaces 1� Sections 12-10&14-5 #Unenclosed 2 TOTAL 15 Outdoor Lighting(maximum) #fixtures Section 14-10-7 T H E W E LT N E R R ES I D E N C E Scott S. Turnipseed, AIA architecture�a�r�s#ruction intenordesign 1701 BUFFEHR CREEK ROAD LOT 1 , FILING 1 , ELENI ZNEIMER SUBDIVISION TOWN OF VAIL 81657 Q EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Q VICINITY MAP: - r 00 �4Lr' 7 200 m H M eEOwo ., ° --------------� — y soo ft O m x 0 0 0 I— 00 ° II r iO.11pper Level Subllaor —' i.O.11pper Level SUbtloar h •— O ^` v` (8306 _ $E1.II pp (8306) V/ ~ >' icn Q vs o O ' } T7�nil 111111111111 U 6 06-- ZT-77z i O-Maln Le el SubFlOOr i O-Maln Le el Sobfloor N r v/ 182961 EI. � \', O OD X1 ]Q O vi • '~ V LLJLJLJ i.O.Lower Level SUblloo U EI.91'0" d �- V ?O.Lower Level Slab i.0.Lo Level5lab _ I- (8282'j�E186'-0' 4EI.8wer 18282, 4 f Fr nt h r t r EI v ti n __ Fro C a ac a e a o II DOUG & ANNE WELTNER Z/FOWNER ROCKFALL NATURAL HAZARDS DRAWING INDEX. r. a� � tinc. N15Roata 02008NAVTEQ or Tpl�A#tas MITIGATION CONSULTANTS (CONCEPTUAL DRB) ART MEARS, P.E., INC. CONSULTANT 555 COUNTY ROAD 16 CS COVER SHEET SITE AREAS SUMMARY: GUNNISON, CO. 81230 A0.0 AMENDED FINAL PLAT (CONCEPTUAL DRB) P: 970-641 -3236 A0. 1 TOPOGRAPHIC LOT SURVEY o A1 . 1 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN TOTAL SITE AREA 92,966 SQ. FT. (LANDSCAPE TOTALS ON A1 .2) Q A1 .2 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN ¢ > SITE COVERAGE ANALYSIS ,,��// � � � � ARCHITECT / BUILDER SCOTT S. TURNIPSEED AIA A2.0 LOWER LEVEL PLAN HOUSE / GARAGE FOOTPRINT 3,927 SQ. FT. or 4% 4' 4 Cn ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTION, A2. 1 FOYER LEVEL PLAN BACK PATIO 478 SQ. FT. or .05% W w w A2.2 MAIN LEVEL PLAN ENTRY STEPS, & WALKS 90 SQ. FT. or .01% w & INTERIOR DESIGN TOWN OF VAIL DRIVEWAY 3,392 SQ. FT. or 3.6% 4 1 143 CAPITOL STREET, SUITE 21 1 TOWN OF VAIL A2.3 UPPER LEVEL PLAN TOTAL COVERAGE and % of TOTAL SITE 7,887 SQ. FT. or 8.2% U N PLANNING RACHEL FRIEDE DIMOND, A3. 1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS P.O. BOX 3388 PLANNER minus DRIVEWAYS or 3.6% ►-� ►—� w w o EAGLE, COLORADO 81631 DEPARTMENT OF 4.6% w (970) 328-3900 COMMUNITY TOTAL SITE AREAS Z DEVELOPMENT w STRUCTURAL PAUL NEWKIRK P: 970-479-2138 ENGINEER NEWKIRK ENGINEERING F: 970-479-2452 407 KENDALL PARKWAY GRFA SUMMARY: BOERNE, TEXAS 78015 FLOOR AREAS SUMMARY: N P: (830) 755-8164 CONCEPTUAL DRB (CONCEPTUAL ��"B F: (830) 755-8172 PROJECT SUMMARY: ( ) NEW BUILDING : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOWER LEVEL FINISHED 1 ,775 SQ. FT. ALLOWABLE GRFA = 5,267.4 S.F. M CIVIL LKP ENGINEERING OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-3 FOYER LEVEL FINISHED 298 SQ. FT. MAIN LEVEL FINISHED 2,899 SQ. FT. EXACT GRAPHIC CALCULATIONS TO FOLLOW AT ENGINEER LUIZA PETROVSKA CONSTRUCTION TYPE : V NON-RATED FINAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL P.O. BOX 2837 NUMBER OF STORIES : TWO + WALKOUT BASEMENT UPPER LEVEL FINISHED 950 SQ. FT. � EDWARDS, CO. 81632 BUILDING HEIGHT : 33'-0" MAX TOTAL FINISHED S.F. 5,922 SQ. FT. LOWER LEVFINISH D S.F. AKDOWN ONLY �, N P: 970-926-9088 ZONING : RC RESIDENTIAL CLUSTER UNFIN. DOUBLE CAR GARAGE S.F. . ( ) UNFINISHED MECH. UNFIN. STUDIO S.F. F: 970-926-9089 LOT AREA : 5.010 ACRES OR 92,966 S.F. . 3 341 70 SQ. FT. 70 UNFIN. MECH. ROOM m SETBACKS: 20' FRONT, 15' SIDES, 15' BACK UNFINISHED STUDIO 341 SQ. FT. 2,787 TOTAL S.F. *.46 ALLOWABLE DEDUCT UNDERGROUND (ESTIMATED % BURIED) O Q L LANDSCAPE FIELDSCAPE PARKING 3 CARS PRIMARY, 2 CARS SECONDARY UNFINISED 2 CAR GARAGE 601 SQ. FT. 1,282 (subtract from total s.f. of 2,787) l , —> RIC FIELDS TOTAL UNFINISHED S.F. 1 ,011 SQ. FT. 1,505 v Q LU ARCHITECT P.O. BOX 1871 -600 ALLOWABLE GARAGE DEDUCTION M, :D Z LU 905 GRFA TOTAL S.F. LOWER LEVEL I—� 0- — U-J AVON, COLORADO 81620 TOTAL ALL S.F. 6,933 SQ. FT. 298 GRFA TOTAL S.F. FOYER LEVEL nU U h� Z N O (970)328-4006 F2,899 GRFA TOTAL S.F. MAIN LEVEL 950 GRFA TOTAL S.F. UPPER LEVEL I—I SURVEYOR GORE RANGE SURVEYING SAM ECKER P.O. BOX 15 5,052 GRFA TOTAL S.F. ALL LEVELS CS AVON, COLORADO 81620 (970)479-8698 COVER SHEET GENERAL INFO. Gore Range Surveying, LLC ��yP.0 Box 15 Avon, CO 81620 (970) 479-8698 • fax (970) 479-0055 0 0 s X ro J o J rn bl) bf) � m w = C Xuv RS • m° OOH a) aa ° O O (.7 (A 16� Scott S. Turnipseed, AIA amhWu2I constm&n I intenordesi®n 16� Scott S. Turnipseed, AIA amhWu2I constm&n I intenordesi®n 16� Scott S. Turnipseed, AIA amhWu2I constm&n I intenordesi®n 1 7 Scott S. Turnipseed, AIA amhi duel wnstmdan I intanordesign 1 7 Scott S. Turnipseed, AIA amhWuo I wnstm&n I trrtenordesgn 15� Scott S. Turnipseed, AIA amhWu2I constm&n I intenordesi®n 16� Scott S. Turnipseed, AIA amhWu2I constm&n I intenordesi®n Arthur I. Mears, P.E., Inc. Natural Hazards Consultants 555 County Road 16 Gunnison, CO 81230 Tel/Fax: (970)641-3236 November 15, 2007 Mr. Brennen Scott Fitzgerald, AIA Turnipseed Architects DRAFT P.O. Box 3388 Eagle, CO 81631 RE: Site visit, The Valley Phase IV" rockfall mitigation, Lots 1 — 3. Dear Brennen: This letter, as requested, evaluates the rockfall hazard potential at building sites 1, 2 and 3, recommends mitigation, and discusses the feasibility of mitigation. My conclusions are based on a site visit last Friday, evaluation of detailed topographic maps and my experience with rockfall hazard evaluation and mitigation at various Colorado locations. 1. Rockfall Hazard All of Lots 1, 2, and 3 appear to be included in a "high severity" rockfall area on Town of Vail maps produced - s - - in 1984. My site inspection last t a week and experience with a rockfall- hazard evaluation completed by me in 1990' suggests that rockfall hazard is not "severe" by Colorado or general mountain standards; it r~ should be classified instead as "moderate." Rockfall hazard originates in sandstone outcroppings of the Minturn formation. This formation crops out roughly 150-300 feet vertically above the building sites staked on the ground. The outcrops are small in aerial extent and have produced some rockfall in the past. Figure 1 shows a typical example roughly 2 feet in length found on the slope. Judging from the intersection of joints and bedding plains in the rock and isolated rocks that have stopped on the slope, this is 'A.1. Mears, P.E., Inc., "Rockfall Hazard Analysis, The Valley, Phase IV, Vail, Colorado", prepared for Ed Zneimer, June 25, 1990. typical of the size of rock to be considered in mitigation design. According to the A.I. Mears (1990) report, rockfall has occurred in the past several decades (prior to 1990) and has reached the valley bottom. Because of the limited rockfall source area, rockfall events will probably be relatively infrequent (one event per decade or less) and will probably consist of only one or two boulders. Most will stop on the slope above the building sites. Because moderate rockfall hazard does exist, structural mitigation for rockfall is recommended, as discussed below. 2. Rockfall Mitigation Two mitigation techniques are feasible at these sites: (a) construction of barriers at or directly above the proposed buildings, and (b) construction of small rockfall energy-absorbing fences on private property below the source areas. Building sites on lots 1, 2 and 3 should all be protected because rockfall paths may be somewhat unpredictable. Rockfall barriers at the buildings, while feasible from a technical perspective, are probably not desirable. Building walls lined on the uphill sides with deformable gabions or planter boxes could be made to absorb rockfall energy and distribute impact forces over a large area, thus avoiding point loads from rock impact and structural damage. The heights of the required structures at the building have not been determined but should be based on the newly-available Town of Vail GIS topography and updated rockfall modeling. Previous work suggests the wall heights might be up to 6 feet at the proposed houses. While this technique could be effective it may not protect the entire house because of the locations of doors, and it may have an undesirable appearance. The second feasible mitigation technique would be construction of small rockfall energy-absorbing fences on the slope, a short distance below the source areas. The design heights and strengths of the fences would be modest because energy and bounce heights will also be modest. They would probably be fairly short at each of the two rock outcroppings2. As discussed at the start of this report, one objective has been to discuss the feasibility of rockfall mitigation. Rockfall mitigation does appear to be feasible at these sites, and should, in my opinion be assumed as such during the permitting process. Sincerely, Arthur I. Mears, P.E. 2 As a rough estimate (not based on detailed analysis)fences may need to be no more than 50 feet in length at possibly two locations between the trail switchbacks but on private property.