Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVail Village Inn Phase I Common Element (1987-2007 partial file documents) . �� e J �%'-�Z ��� 2--0, I �i F�7 (V t� h.+,��5 Kennerly, applicants, also spoke in favor of the project. Rickli felt that garages should not be counted as site coverage if they were not counted as GRFA. He also proposed eliminating 4 parking spaces and decreasing the curb cuts from 4 to 3 . Jim Viele asked Betsy if the staff had had time to review the new proposal, and she replied that they had not. Craig Snowdon, architect representing the adjacent neighbors to the west, Steve Berkowitz, read a letter from Berkowitz objecting to the encroachments, stating that views would be negatively impacted. ' J.J. felt it was difficult to consider the proposal with a discrepancy in statistics. Peggy Osterfoss agreed and also felt concern for Berkowitz 's views. Rickli disagreed that the additions would impact the views from the Berkowitz property. Peggy added that the burying of the garage was a step in the right direction, but she stated that she would like to see fewer than 3 road cuts with more landscaping instead of asphalt. Diana agreed and added that her main concern was the stream setback. Sid' s biggest concern was site coverage. He also felt there was too much asphalt. Briner mentioned that this was a DRB issue. Pam Hopkins abstained from comment because her firm was working on the Berkowitz proposal. Jim Viele stated that when a proposal contains so many variance requests, it is a good indication that too much is being placed on the site. Jerry Lewis asked if he could table and Peter answered that the item could be tabled until 4/27 if the applicant could get revised figures and drawings into the Community Development Departmant by Wednesday morning, the 22nd. Lewis requested to table to 4/27 . Diana moved and Sid seconded to table the request until April 27. The vote was 5-0-1 (Pam abstained from voting. ) 6. A request to amend Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn. Tom Braun presented the amendment request and stated the staff recommended denial, citing the need for additional parking, assurances the Ski Museum would be relocated, and the need for accommodation units. Jay Peterson, representing the applicant, reminded the board that twice the Vail Village Inn complex had submitted phased projects, but the potential developers could not fund the projects. Now Joe Staufer will develop the new phases himself. Jay explained the valet parking and stated that it was a temporary measure until the next phase could be constructed. He stated that it was not economically feasible for Mr. Staufer to construct additional parking with this phase. � , , , � Jay stated that the applicant was willing to restrict the dwelling units per the staff recommendation. Regarding the Ski Museum, Jay stated that 4,000 square feet of building could be given to the Town to use free of charge for any use the Town would want. Pam asked if valet parking was planned for the commercial area, and Jay replied that it was not. Joe Staufer stated that he had 30 - 50 parking spaces that are always empty. He added that the Sonnenalp, Plaza, and Bell Tower had all expanded and none had added any parking. Jay then pointed out that there were no large projects being constructed at this time which were not phased. Pam agreed with the parking, and felt that perhaps more locals would be using this parking lot. Sid also did not have any problem with the parking and felt that to receive the 4, 000 square feet of space in the building was better for the Town than for the Town to receive $15, 000 to relocate the Ski Museum. He did feel that the new residential units should be controlled for public use. Diana felt the units needed to be available for rental. She felt that the Museum relocation must be worked out and must be a part of this amendment. Joe Staufer felt that the Town did not gain anything by "kicking the owner out" especially if the owner wanted to be in Vail for two months in the summer. Mr. Staufer suggested that the unit be available for rental and not be the primary residence of the owner. Diana stated that she did not patronize many of the stores in the Vail Village Inn complex because she did not have any place to park. Diana asked for a commitment to finish the building as proposed. However, she still felt that there would be a parking problem. Jay said that for the parking to work, all the phases must be done. Peggy Osterfoss felt that the proposal should include assurance that the developer will relocate the Ski Museum and relandscape because a landscaped area was being removed in the proposal. Jay replied that with the new proposal, the Town of Vail would end up with a large chunk of real estate. He added that the applicant was willing to participate in redoing the intersection. Peggy stated that she did not want to see the landscaping issue lost in the shuffle, and felt the responsibility rested with the developer. More discussion followed concerning parking. Peter pointed out that parking spaces under the condos were controlled by a gate and were under utilized. Tom felt that it was the responsibil- ity of the developer to provide parking on the site. J.J. referred to the memo which indicated a shortfall of 100 spaces. He was told 18% of the spaces were required to be valet and he � . ti wondered how the decision was made to have 18% of the spaces be valet. Tom replied that it varied with use. He added that phases I and II contained 22,000 square feet and phase III contained 10, 000 square feet with no parking provided. He added that he felt it was the repsponsibility of the developer to provide parking on the site. Joe Stauffer said he would like to be able to pay into the parking fund as did businesses in Commercial Core I and II. J.J. suggested that perhaps Staufer could pay the Town for parking at building permit time and the Town could repay Staufer when his parking was complete. The Ski Museum was discussed. Tom stated that at present the amended SDD did not address the needs of the Ski Museum. Jay pointed out that the space offered to the Town was worth $1 Million. J.J. said it seemed like an opportunity for the Town, the space could be sold for a substantial amount of cash. Tom pointed out that one condition was that it be used for the public. Jay stated that they were willing to remove that stipulation. J.J. felt the key issue of the owner/rental question was occu- pancy and this issue was discussed. Also discussed was the deletion of landscaping for parking. Saundra Smith stated that they were willing to remove two parking spaces and place landscaping in place of the spaces. Peter felt to approve the proposed shortfall of parking would be inconsistent. He pointed out that the Westin was not able to do any more construction until the parking structure was finished. He stated that the Plaza and Bell Tower were different, in that they were in a pedestrian area and paid into the parking fund. He pointed out that the proposal under construction was adjacent to the 4-way stop with vehicle access and must have on-site parking. J.J. discussed the parking figures. Joe Staufer proposed to make the dwelling units be available for rental when they were unoccupied. Sid Schultz moved and J.J. Collins seconded to approve the amendments to SDD 6 as submitted with the following conditioins: 1. The use of the units be restricted to non-primary residence and be part of a rental pool. 2 . The applicant shall participate in and not remonstrate against a special improvement district for the intersection of Vail Road and Meadow Drive. 3 . The vote was 5-1 in favor. J.J. left at this point. 7. A request for setback variances in order to construct additions to the property at Lot 2 , Block l, Vail Village lst Filing. A�plicants: Howard, Judy and Steven Berkowitz Rick Pylman showed a site plan and explained the proposal, adding that the staff recommendation was for approval. Craig Snowdon, architect for the project, explained the plans. Peggy Osterfoss suggested the deck be only over the garage, and Craig said he would reduce the deck. Diana moved and Peggy seconded to approve the request per the staff inemo. The vote was 4 - 0 - 1 abstention (Pam) . 8 . A request for a side setback variance in order to construct a garage at 325 Forest Road. A�plicant: Tim Drisko Tom Braun showed an improvement survey and explained the request. Gary Walker, representing the applicant, stated that the main reason for the location of the garage was to have access to an existing driveway and parking in front of the garage. Diana Donovan moved and Pam Hopkins seconded to approve the request per the staff inemo. The vote was 5-0 in favor. 9. A request to amend the zoning code in order to add a new zone district to be entitled "Hillside Residential. " Applicant: Town of Vail This item was tabled. ' �� • � • � 0 , � _ A L T A C O M M I T M E N T SCHEDULE A - Our Order No. V18762 For Information Only A PART OF LOT B AMENDED MAP VAIL VI DEED TO TOWN B222 P395 (OLD SKI MUSEUM SITE) - Charges - ALTA Owner Policy $155.00 - - TOTAL - - $155. 00 ****WITH YOUR REMITTANCE PLEASE REFER TO OUR ORDER NO. V18762 . **** 1. Effective Date: April 08, 1992 at 8: 00 A.M. 2. Policy to be issued, and proposed Insured: "ALTA" Owner's Policy 1987 Revision (Amended 1990) Proposed Insured: THE TOWN OF VAIL 3 . The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A Fee Simple 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: THE TOWN OF VAIL 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: A PART OF LOT "B", AMENDED MAP OF VAIL VILLAGE, SECOND FILING, EAGLE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 80 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. : THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 7 A DISTANCE OF 390.78 FEET: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS A DISTANCE OF 25. 00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT "B", SAID POINT BEING 73 . 00 FEET NORTHERLY FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT "B" AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE AFORESAID COURSE A DISTANCE OF 98.75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY PAGE 1 _,� J � A L T A C O M M I T M E N T SCHEDULE B-2 (Exceptions) Our Order No. V18762 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Standard Exceptions 1 through 5 printed on the cover sheet. 6. Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special assessments not yet certified to the Treasurer's office. 7. Any unpaid taxes or assessments against said land. 8. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any. 9. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED September 04, 1923, IN BOOK 93 AT PAGE 98. 10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED September 04, 1923 , IN BOOK 93 AT PAGE 98. 11. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED January 09, 1963, IN BOOK 174 AT PAGE 431. 12 . RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 1969 IN BOOK 216 AT PAGE 212, AFFECTING THE EAST 10 FEET OF THE NORTH 166. 30 FEET OF SUBJECT PROP ERTY. �-..._....___..._..._..__. 13 . RESERVATION AS CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDFt JANUARY 23 , 1976 N BOOK 244 AT PAGE 395: ..�_1 ---_ THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED PROPERTY SHALL BE USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR A MUSEUM OR OTHER RELATED PUBLIC USE FOR 25 YEARS FROM THE DATE OF SAID DEED. PAGE 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: May 11, 1992 SUBJECT: A request to rezone the "Ski Museum" pocket park site from Public Accommodarion to Public Use District. The site is generally located at the northwest intersection of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive. (See attached legal Exhibit A). Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Mike Mollica I. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The Town of Vail is the owner of the property generally located at the northwest intersection of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive, commonly refened to as the Ski Museum Pocket Park site. This parcel was acquired from the Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company on June 25, 1975, with the condirion that the property be used exclusively for a museum or other related public use for a period of twenty-five (25) yeazs from the date of the deed. Up until the fall of 1991, the Town had been using this site for the purposes of housing the Colorado Ski Museum. During the fall of 1991, the Colorado Ski Museum relocated to the Vail Village Transportation Center and the structure on the ski museum site has subsequently been demolished. The property is currently vacant and the Town's intentions are to construct a small pocket pazk in this locarion. The Ski Museum Pocket Park site is currently zoned Public Accommodation (PA). As stated in the Zoning Code, the Public Accommodation Zone District "is intended to provide sites for lodges and residential accommodations for visitors, together with such public and semipublic facilities and limited professional offices, medical facilities, private recrearion, and related visitor-oriented uses as may appropriately be located in the same district." As such, the PA District only allows for lodges, and accessory dining decks as perniitted uses in the District. Conditional uses in the PA District range from professional and business offices, hospitals and dental clinics, to theaters, meeting rooms and convention facilities, and churches. Public parks and recrearion faciliries are also listed as conditional uses in the PA Zone District. The Town of Vail is requesting that the zoning on the ski museum site be changed from Public Accommodation to Public Use District (PUD). As stated in the zoning code, the 1 Public Use Zone District "is intended to ensure that public buildings and grounds and certain types of quasi-public uses permitted in the district are appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail, to hannonize with surrounding uses, and in the case of buildings and other structures, to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of uses." Public parks, playgrounds and open space, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and seasonal structures or uses to accommodate educarior�al, recreational, or cultural activities, are all pennitted uses within the Public Use District.� II. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. Suitability of the Proposed Zoning. Although it is possible to request a conditional use permit to construct a pocket park on the ski museum site, given the Public Accommodation Zone District, it is the staff's opinion �hat the Public Use District is a much more appropriate zone district for the uses anticipated for this site. We believe that the proposed pocket park more closely meets the purpose secrion of the Public Use District, than the Public Accommodarion Zone District. B. Is the amendment proposal presenting a convenient, workable relationship among land uses consistent with municipal objectives? The ski museum site has been specifically designated as a pocket pazk site in the recently approved Streetscape Master Plan. Preliminary design work for the pocket park is currently underway, and it is anticipated that should this zoning change be approved, the pocket park would be constructed during the summer of 1992. The Town of Vail Land Use Plan has designated the ski museum site as a "transition zone". The Land Use Plan further defines a transition zone as an azea in which "activities and site design are aimed at encouraging pedestrian flow through the area and strengthening the connection between the two commercial cores. Appropriate activiries include hotels, lodging and other tourist oriented residential units, ancillary retail and restaurant uses, museums, areas of public art, natural exhibits, gardens, pedestrian plazas, and other types of civic and culturally oriented uses. The staff believes that the rezoning of this site from PA to Public Use District would be consistent with the zoning previously placed on Gerald R. Ford Park. Town parks are also zoned Agricultural/Open Space, and Greeenbelt Natural Open Space. C. Does the rezoning proposal provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community? The staff feels that this proposed rezoning, and use of this site as a pocket pazk, would 2 . provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community, and would also strengthen the pedestrian connection between the Village core and the Lionshead core. The Streetscape Master Plan addresses this site as follows: "A pocket park is proposed on the ski museum site, creating a sense of pedestrian entry for the corridor and a better visual connection to East Meadow Drive. The park would include needed public restrooms, searing, and extensive landscaping." At this time, public restrooms are not included in the pazk design. If a restroom is proposed in the future, it would require a conditional use review. The PUD allows for site specific review of development standards through the conditional use process. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recommendarion for the proposed rezoning of this property from Public Accommodation to Public Use District is for approval. We believe that the Public Use District designation is the more appropriate zone district for the uses which are anticipated for this property. We also believe that the addition of a pocket park on this site would be in conformance with the Town's Streetscape Master Plan, and that the pocket park would be a positive contribution to the community as a whole. 3 • � EXHIBIT A. The site is located at the northwest intersecrion of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive, and more specifically described as follows: A part of Lot "B", Amended Map of Vail Village, Second Filing, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the 6th P.M.: thence Southerly along the East Line of said Section 7 a distance of 390.78 ft; thence on an angle to the right of 90°00'00" a distance of 25.00 ft to a point on the East Line of said Lot "B", said point being 73.00 feet Northerly from the SE corner of said Lot "B" and the true point of beginning; thence continuing along the aforesaid course a distance of 98.75 ft to a point on the Southwesterly line of said Lot "B", which is the Northeasterly line of W. Meadow Dr.; thence on an angle to the left of 121°43'21" and along the curve to the right having a radius of 175.00 feet and a central angle of 02°06'21 and an arc distance of 6.43 ft to a point of tangent; thence continuing along said tangent a distance of 33.97 ft to a point of curve; thence on a curve to the left having a radius of 75.00 ft and a ceniral angle of 60°23'00" and an arc distance of 79.04 ft to a point of tangent; thence continuing along said tangent a distance of 13.48 ft to the Southeasterly corner of said Lot "B", said corner being 25.00 ft Westerly of the East line of said Section 7; thence on an angle to the left of 90°00'00" and along the Easterly line of said Lot "B" and along a line parallel to the East line of said Section 7 a distance of 73.00 ft to the true point of beginning, more generally known as NW corner of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive, Vail, Colorado. 4 � � TO�IVN OF VAIL 30UNDARY I MOUNTAIN BELL 160 149 ❑ ABC SCHOOL, � � LEARNING TREE I '41N BELL RD. PARCEL B � � 129 SPRADDLE CRE�K � IA`r RANCH � i V V 100 N. FitONTAGE RD. . , i 7' 6 - . '�ELIPAp � � � ,\ I25 ��T LOT D,VAIL VILUaGE 2nd F1L1NG FFICE fll i PO ICE 8 i� 2 � OWN OFrICES O MAIN VAIL � • 75 EX1T VAIL � AT'L BA K • � ,, 2 BLDG.� SCOR 10 I i0e D � �Z� HOLIDAY INN SKAAL 13 • HOUSE ALPHORN ANDAR GqT�w4r �q� �Z� � STA. LOT 0 • • 28 12 �' DR. A o N � _LAGE 2n OLiDAY � VAIL VILLAGE IINN 14� EAST•W I I 4 3 ta2 t22 2 � HOUSE JI 100 �DS 14� ° I I 162 ¢• M a � = TR CEN�R TION I H2 9 B > O ARCADE �''- r I I � P u 241 i 44 AIL FIRE• 15 EA T _ NG M�a:cow ���T. ,r"��aoow D� � F ( valL 4, So�NEw+� Swi55 r7 VILLAGE MEa00w � � TRGLT B �L � TALISMAN CMA�E'T V � a�sr . . . G � � � C�NTER SONNENALP vIL!a Isr 6 2 � �zo 5c 24z ,-�aC C f 37 36 CORTIN BANK r � �� COVERED 22 f t24 BRIDGE STOR • 153 123 17 I 0 227 �— TRAC J BA�APo�A REE O f� G r 27 HAPEL MS R ER SE 6 p RE �K 5g �3 F P 3�t S 154 28 • 19 83 EDELW_. p P � p . , L � 84 3� �A�T 2 w 103 M ITZMAR OWER ' - 26 29 � I 63 �O"� 5 183 193 201 I I 5 1� I&5 30 32 �OP43 1RACT H 123 � CASINO BLDG. � IIS gs Wfl.LDW R VA RI _ • RCApE r � � FpR 33 34 • ��� 6�' � �S��e 225 �, G PLAZA LODGE � 186 16o E T 45 IS 35 44 � �7 �O 133 a°�� 5r. � H 2B1-243 `{.J g g • 8 � � 6 146 5126 74 RIDGE S. A,B,G 174 TICKET OFF�C : 3 9 A 8 A 7 4 97 7 VAIL RoAD m�V L C ' 167 14T 127 107 � � , 2 A B �� e�aK� � �PQ � RESUB. LOT C, BLK. 5C �o�Kef �i�aK ���'e . . ' � t r � � ORDINANCE NO. 16 Serles of 1992 AN ORDINANCE REZONING A PARCEL OF PROPERTY FROM PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION DISTRICT TO PUBLIC USE DISTRICT� GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF VAIL ROAD AND WEST MEADOW DRIVE, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A; AND AMENDING TNE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP IN RELATION TO THE REZONING OF SAID PROPERTY. WHEREAS, the property to be rezoned is located wfthin the mun(cipal Hm(ts of tthe Town of Vafl; and WHEREAS, the Plan�ing and Environmental Commission has considered the appropriate rezoning for the property and has unanimously recommended that the Town Council rezone the parcel from Pubiic Accommodation to Pubiic Use; and WHEREAS, the Town Councii considers it in the public interest to rezone said property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. . The Town Council finds that the procedures for the provision of rezoning property in,�he Town of Vail have been fuifilled, and the Town Council hereby received the report of recommendation from the Planning and Environmental Commission recommending the rezoning of said property. Section 2. � , Pursuant to Section 18.66.100 - 18.66.180 of the Vail Municipal Code, the parcel of property legally described in the attached Exhibit A is zoned as Public Use. Sectlon . ; As provided in the ordinances of the Town of Vail, the zoning administrator is hereby directed to modify and amend the official zoning map to include the zoning specified 'en Sect;on 2 above. Section 4 If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the �emaining portions of this �. ' 1 _ ', . ' � ordinance;and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 5 The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vaii and the inhabltants thereof. Section 6 � The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action o� proceeding as commenced under of by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 7 � All bylaws,orders, resolutions and ordinances,or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such fnconsistency. Thls repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this 19th day of May , 1992. A public hearing shall be held hereon on the 2nd day of June , 1992, at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, in the Municipal Building of the Town. a. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayo ATTEST: �,IL,Gt�'�av �. K.�i�.P,t.&�n/ Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk 2 • • I � tI READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED : by title only this 2nd day of June � 1992. �X. - . Margare A. Ostertoss, Mayor ATTEST: n�►,t� �- 2�v . . Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk 3 ... . .. . .. ! ... . . .. � • ` \' . EXHIBIT A. � The site is located �at the northwest intersecaon of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive, and more specifically described as follows: A part of Lot "B", Amended Map of Vail Village, Second Filing, Counry of Eagle� State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Section 7, Township 5 South� Range 80 West of the 6th P.M.: thence Southcrly along the East Line of said Secaon 7 a distance of 390.78 ft; thence on an angle to the right of 90°00'00" a distance of 25.00 ft to a point on the East Line of said Lot "B", said point being 73.00 feet Northerly from the SE corner of said Lot "B" and the true point of beginning; thence continuing along the aforesaid course a distance of 98.75 ft to a point on the Southwesterly line of said Lot "II", which is the Northeasterly line of W. Meadow Dr.; thence on an angle to the left . of 121°43'21" and along,the curve to the right having a radius of 175.00 feet and a central angle of 02°06'21 and an arc distance of 6.43 ft to a point of tangent; thence continuing along said tangent a distance of 33.97 ft to a point of curve; thence on a curve to the left having a radius of 75.00 ft and a central angle of 60°23'00" and an arc distance of 79.04 ft to a point of tangent; thence conpnuing along said tangent a distance of 13.48 ft to the Southeasterly corner of said Lot "B", said corner being 25.00 ft Westerly of the East line of said Section 7; thence on an angle to the left of 90°00'00" and along the Easterly ]ine of said L.ot "II" and along a line parallel to the East line of said Section 7 a distance of 73.00 ft to the true point of beginning, more � generally known as NW corner of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive, Vail, . Colorado. . , . ��� � �I�l T �-o �4���... Z -. V V� �►►4s�. �! �u�t,� ? ' j , Staufer Commercial, L. L. C. ~ ���`'`"-� ��`� 100 East Meadow Drive #31 Mr. Stan Zemler Vail, Colorado 81657 Town Manager 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Co. 81657 September 29, 2007 � Dear Stan, Thank you for your letter of September 26`�. Admittedly there is no legal obligation for the Town to revert the space back to me. However the justification for the requirement for me to deec� this space to the Town was to create a Park where the Ski Museum was located at that time. The Park has been created at a cost of$ 75,000 to me. Again, I go back to the verbal guaranties that have been made to me that the space will be used for the Ski Museum. If you research the staff memos as well as the tapes from the Planning Commission Meetings as well as the tapes of the Council Meetings you will find that it was always referred to as the Ski Museum, Ski Museum, Ski Museum. Since the Ski Museum appears to be well taken care of, I believe the space should be used for a public purpose such as the Vail Chamber and Business Association. To advertise and use the space now for regular commercial uses is, in my opinion, a breach of trust and an unethical depariure from our understanding. I hope that you will reconsider and use the space for what it intended for and failing that I rely on the integrity of the Council. Yours T�l�,y, ,? � ! ,.�.� � . �,�- Jos�f` u�'e i' � . t �Phone (970) 476-5450 Fax (9 i 0) 476-5461 joestauferQearthlink.net � Pnnced on l00"/„pns�a�mumer u�asre i . � � Exhibit A February, 1992 SDD No. 6 - Vail Viliaqe Inn Parkinq Summarv i. Required Parking (Per Code) Parkinq Spaces Required Phase I - 3$ 12 Phase II = 1� 98 Phase ill = 84.45 Phase IV = 63.97 Phase IV-A* = 16.50 Phase V = 39.46 Total = 260.48 - 13.02 (5% multiple use credit) Grand Total = 247.46 or 248 ` Phase IV-A is not currently constructed II. Approved Parking Plan The Phase IV-A approval will provide the following parking scheme: 44 - structured spaces - deeded to VVI owners 65 - structured spaces - available to the general public 30 - surface spaces - adjacent to the Food 8� Deli. One space will be reserved for the Food & Deli manager and all others will be available for short-term public parking. 10 - surface spaces - east of the Gateway 4 - valet s;�rface spaces - north of the Pancake House 24 - surface spaces - north of the Pancake House/Lobby Building 177 - Total spaces to be provided III. The VVI is obligated to provide the following parking, if and when the final Phase IV is constructed: 12 - surface spaces 324 - structured spaces 37 - structured valet spaces 373 - Total