Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
B12-0108
Community Development Department 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado USA 81657 A. V�� CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY This certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of Title 10, Section 10 -1 -2, ADOPTED CODES of the Vail Town Code certifying that, at the time of issuance, this structure was found to be substantially in compliance with the various ordinances of the town regulating building construction or use for the following: Name and description of project Single Family Residence Address of project: 446 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado Owner name and address: Vail Slope LLC PO Box 2395 Edwards, Colorado 81632 IBC Edition: 2012 Occupancy Group(s): R3 Type(s) of Construction: VB Permit Number(s): B12 -0108 Occupant Load:7 NA Sprinkler System Y/ N Type:Y T)zv Martin Haeberle, Chief Building Official Date Department of Community Development 0 75 South Frontage Road TOWN OF VAIL Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970 -479 -2128 www.vailgov.corn Development Review Coordinator BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (Separate applications are required for alarm & sprinkler) Project Street Address: 446 Forest Road (Number) (Street) Building /Complex Name: 446 Forest Road Contractor Information (Suite #) Business Name: English and Associates, Inc. Business Address: PO Box 2395 City Edwards State: CO Zip: 81632 Contact Name: Michael English Contact Phone: 970 -471 -0303 Contact E -Mail: michael @englishdeveloper.com I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved, International Buildingand Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town cable thereto. X Owner /Owner's Representative Signature (Required) Applicant Information Applicant Name: Michael English Applicant Phone: 970471 -0303 Applicant E -Mail: michael @englishdeveloper.com Project Information p Owner Name: Vail Slo eside LLC Parcel #: 2101- 071 -14 -005 (For Parcel #, contact Eagle County Assessors Office at (970- 328.8640 or visit www.eaglecounty.us/patie) For Office Use Only: Fee Paid: Received From: Cash Check # CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # exp date: Project #: PRS11— p7o DRB#:—UR1a Coln Building Permit #: NQ —0 � Lot #: Block # Subdivision: Work Class: New () Addition (0 Alteration (O Type of Building: Single - Family (j Duplex () Multi - Family (0 Commercial G Other 0 Work Type: Interior O Exterior Both k-! Valuation of Work Included Plans Included Work Electrical GYes ONO OYes ONo 154255 Mechanical Yes ONO (: )Yes (ONo 144700 Plumbing GYes OjNo GYes (ONo 164700 Building (i)Yes ONo QYes ONo 3296643 Value of all work being performed: $ 3760298 (value based on IBC Section 109.3 & IRC Section 108.3) Electrical Square Footage 7208 Detailed Scope and Location of Work: New single family residence at 446 Forest Road Vail Colorado. (use additional sheet if necessary) Date Received: D LGL�ME D APR 16 2012 TOWN OF VAIL 12- Mar -2012 A =.-.: RESORT DESIGN ARCHITECTS TO: Martin Haeberle COMPANY: Town of Vail Community Development Department ADDRESS: 75 South Frontage Rd. West Vail Colorado RE: Final DRB Submittal CC: Michael English We are sending via Hand Delivered TRANSMITTAL FROM: Tom Frye DATE: April 16, 2012 JOB NAME: 446 Forest Road JOB NUMBER: 23374 ® Attached ❑ Originals ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Specifications ❑ Other ❑ Under separate cover ® Prints ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Change Order ❑ i COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 4/16/12 Signed Building Permit Application 1 4/16/12 Application Fee Check 4 4/16/12 Permit Drawing Sets 1 4/16/12 RES Check Report 1 4/16/12 Soils Report ® For review and comment ❑ For approval ❑ For your information ❑ For your use ❑ As requested NOTE: Digital copies of all above information will be delivered via email. www.ResortDesign.com I California: 625 Market Street • Fourteenth Floor • San Francisco, CA 94105 • 415.392.4433 • Fax 415.392.4454 Colorado: 30 Benchmark Road • Suite 220 • Avon, CO 81620 • 970.949.0899 • Fax 970.949.0933 Geotechnical Exploration Study Proposed Duplex Lot 5, Block i, Vail Village, Filing 3 446 Forest Road Vail, Colorado Project No. 11- 196.01 September 23, 2011 Prepared For: English and Associates, Inc. Attn: Michael English PO Box 2395 Edwards, Colorado 81632 Prepared By: e 'VG N EERA14 > Geotechnical Engineering (970) 485 -4657 GeorgeB @GoreRangeEngineering.com Office Address: 590 Brian Ave., Unit E Silverthorne, Colorado 80497 Environmental ConsultinS; (970) 485-4248 JasonD @GoreRangeEngineering.com Mailing Address; E.G. Box 6213 Dillon, Colorado 80435 www.GoreRangeEngineering. com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ............................. - 1 - ........ ..... 2.0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ................................... - 1 - ............................... 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS .................................................... -1- ............................... 4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION .............................................. - 1 - ............................... 5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ...................................... - 2- .............................. 6.o DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................ ............................... - 2- 6.i FOUNDATIONS AND RETAINING WALLS ................................... ...........6...........6....... - 2- 6.2 FLOOR SLABS ................................................................................... ............................... - 4- 6.3 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM .................................................................. ............................... - 4- 6.4 SITE GRADING .............................................................. .................................................... 5- 6.5 SURFACE DRAINAGE ................................ ............................... ....... ............................... - 6- 7.0 RADON ....................................................................... ......................6....... - 6- 8.0 LIMITATIONS ............................................................ ............................... 6- ATTACHMENTS FIGURE 1- EXPLORATORY PIT LOCATIONS FIGURE 2 - EXPLORATORY PTT LOGS FIGURE 3 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 4 - SWELL - CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 5 - TYPICAL UNDERDRAIN DETAIL GORE RANGE ENGINEERING Project No. ii- 196.oi September 23, 2011 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY Gore Range Engineering (GRE) is pleased to submit this Geotechnical Exploration Study for the proposed duplex at 445 Forest Road in Vail, Colorado. This study was conducted in accordance with our Proposal to English and Associates, Inc. dated September 12, 2011. The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site and provide foundation design recommendations. Our conclusions and recommendations are presented in this report. Evaluation of potential geologic hazards is beyond the scope of this study. The exploration was accomplished by observing two exploratory pits at the locations shown on Figure i. Samples of the soils/bedrock encountered were tested in our laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. This report, which is based on visual observation of site conditions, results of laboratory testing, and our experience in the area, summarizes the data obtained and includes recommendations for: • Foundation type and depth including allowable soil hearing pressure. • Lateral earth loadings against foundation walls and site retaining walls. • Bac'xfill placement and compaction. • Floor slab support. • Surface and subsurface drainage. 2.0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Plans for the proposed duplex have not been developed. We understand the duplex will likely consist of a two story structure over a walkout basement level. A garage for each unit will be provided at the basement level. Wood and /or timber frame construction will be used above grade with cast -in -place concrete foundation walls below grade. The lower level and garage floors will be slab -on- grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 14 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. Once building plans have been developed we should be notified to verify that the recommendations contained in this report are appropriate. 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS The project site was vacant at the time of our field exploration. The ground surface slopes down towards the north - northwest with about 50 feet of relief across the property. The property is bordered by single family residences to the east and west, Forest Road to the north and Vail Ski Area to the south. Vegetation across the site generally consists of aspen and pine trees with an understory of grass and brush. 4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on September 15, 2011. Two exploratory pits were excavated at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The pits were excavated with a Bobcat mini- trackhoe and logged by a representative of GRE. PageI - I - GORE RANGE ENGINEERING Project No. 11- 196.oi September 23, 2olt Samples of the subsoils were taken with relatively undisturbed and disturbed sampling methods. The depths at which the samples were taken are shown on the Exploratory Pit Logs, Figure 2. The samples were reviewed by the project engineer and returned to our laboratory for testing. 5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. Approximately 14 to 18 inches of topsoil was encountered at the ground surface of the pits. The subsoils encountered generally consisted of roughly 2 feet of loose silt and sand (SM -ML) overlying silty, sandy gravel (GM) to depths of 6 to 6.5 feet. Below the GM soils, we encountered siltstone bedrock to the depths explored of ii and 13 feet. The bedding planes of the siltstone generally dip with the hillside. At a depth of 6.5 feet in Pit 1 and io feet in Pit 2, we encountered a 3 inch thick layer (sill) of basalt. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavation. The subsoils were generally moist. Groundwater levels in mountainous regions can fluctuate during seasonal runoff and heavy precipitation events. We have encountered shallow, perched seasonal groundwater in this area. Results of the laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the pits are shown in the Table below. Table 1- Laboratory Test Results n- nTctce Percent Percent . tune In- place ` Liquid I Plasticity I passing the retained on SwelljConsol t P2-'34 density j Limit index No. No. 1 9.5% - - - 6496 - - 1 4 -5 ft io.996 - 3296 8% 33% 51% - 1 7 ft 10.9% 130.7 pcf - - 65% - +0.1% Results of a gradation analysis conducted on a sample of the GM soils is shown on Figure 3. Results of swell- consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed drive sample of the natural siltstone indicate a very low expansion potential when wetted under a relatively light surcharge (see Figure 4). 6.o DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 FOUNDATIONS AND RETAINING WALLS Considering the soil and bedrock conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the residence be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural GM soils or siltstone bedrock. All topsoil. loose silt and sand (SM -ML) soils, loose or disturbed soils should be removed beneath footing areas. The subgrade Should then be moigtgned, necessary, and compacted to provide a flat. dense and level subgrade. Inundation of the foundation excavations should be avoided during construction.. The footing subgrade soils should not be allowed to dry excessively. If water seepage is encountered, the footing areas should be dewatered before concrete placement and we should be contacted for further evaluation. Our recommendations for a spread footing foundation system and foundation /retaining wall design are presented in the Tables below. It should be noted that soil conditions in this region can change abruptly within a relatively small area. A representative of GRE should observe the footing subgrade prior to concrete placement to confirm the recommendations in this report are appropriate. Pagel -2- GORE RANGE ENGINEERING Project No. ii- 196.01 September 23, 2011 Table 2 - Footing Dimension Information - Spread Footings Footing ni'1 ' ETINFormatfon =ameter r value Allowable Soil Bearing At -rest Condition3 Pressure 3,000 psi' Minimum Dead Load o psf Minimum Footing Widths Continuous walls - 16 inches T Isolated pads - 24 inches Footing Notes: 1. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed will be approximately i inch or less. Footings that bear on both soil and bedrock could undergo some differential settlement. 2. Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover for frost protection. A minimum of 42 inches of soil cover is typical in the area. 3. Concrete should not be placed on frost, frozen soil, snow or ice. Table 3 - Foundation Wall Information Paged -3- GORE RANGE ENGINEERING At -rest Condition3 55 pcf - EFP, on -site GM soils as backfill? Active Condition4 45 pef - EFP, on -site GM soils or fractured siltstone as backfill? Passive Resistances 300 pc-1.1 - EFP, on -site GM soils or fractured siltstone as backfills Base Friction Coefficients 0.35 (unitless) Foundation Wall Notes: 1. All foundation and retaining walls should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The above pressures assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water or upward sloping backfill behind a wall will increase the lateral earth pressures imposed on the structure. 2. An underdrain and wall drain system should be provided behind all foundation and retaining walls to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup. 3. The at -rest condition is typically appropriate for walls that are laterally supported and expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection. 4. The active condition is normally selected for cantilevered retaining structures that can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition. 5. Lateral resistance of retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. The friction coefficient and passive pressure value recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur and ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be a granular material compacted to at least 95% of Standard Proctor dry density at a moisture content near optimum. 6. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported length of 10 feet. Wall Back-fill Notes: 7. Foundation wall backfill should have a maximum particle size of 6 inches. 8. Imported wall backfill should be a relatively well - graded granular material consisting primarily of sand and gravel and contain less than 15% passing the No. 200 sieve and no rocks larger than 6 inches in diameter. 9. The upper 1 to 2 feet of the backfill should be a relatively impervious material, or a pavement structure should be provided, to reduce surface water infiltration into the backfill. lo. Compaction recommendations are given in the "Site Grading" section of this report. pcf - pounds per cubic foot, EFP - equivalent fluid luid pressure Paged -3- GORE RANGE ENGINEERING Project No. ii- i96.ot September 23, 2011 6.2 FLOOR SLABS The on -site GM soils or siltstone bedrock are judged suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. All loose silt and sand (SM -ML) soils and topsoil should be removed beneath slab areas. Required fill can consist of the on -site GM soils or fractured siltstone (no rocks larger than about 6 inches in diameter). Compaction recommendations for fill placed in slab areas are given in the "Site Grading" section of this report. Inundation of the underslab areas should be avoided during construction. The slab subgrade soils should not be allowed to dry excessively. Our recommendations for slab design are as follows: To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free - draining gravel should be placed beneath the basement and garage slabs to provide a flat, uniform subgrade. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. We recommend the gravel be compacted with a vibratory plate until settlement ceases. To prevent water from collecting below the slabs, the underslab gravel should be connected to the perimeter underdrain system on the downhill side of the building. 6.3 UIv DERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in mountainous areas, and where bedrock is shallow, that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain and wall drain system. Our recommendations for a typical underdrain system are given below. It should be noted that these systems are not sized to account for large amounts of surface water or concentrated flow. If the client would like more guidance or detailed recommendations for this specific site, please contact us. • The underdrain system should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free - draining gravel. The drainpipe should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 18 inches below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum i% to a suitable gravity outlet or sump and pump system. The invert elevation of the perimeter drainpipe at the highpoint should be roughly 6 inches below bottom of adjacent footing elevation. • If free water is encountered during excavation, we should be contacted to re- evaluate our recommendations. • Free - draining gravel used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. Zoo sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 2 feet deep and extend at least x foot above any water seepage observed in the excavation cut slope. The drain gravel should be covered with filter fabric prior to placement of backfill soils. • A wall drain system consisting of a geocomposite or i foot of clean gravel should be placed adjacent to below grade construction walls. The wall drain system should connect to the underdrain and extend to Paged -4- GORE RANGE ENGINEERING Prot No. ii- 1g6.oi September 23, 2011 within 1 to 2 feet of the ground surface. The wall drain should not extend to finish grade ATypical Underdrain Detail is shown on Figure 5. We assume the water and sewer service lines will enter the building configuration from Forest Road (downhill). If the water and /or sewer service lines enter the building from the uphill side, the gravel bedding should be connected to the perimeter underdrain system to prevent subsurface water in the bedding material from entering the building. An alternative method to reducing the flow of water towards the residence within the trench is to interrupt the gravel bedding with a 4 to 5 foot thick bulkhead of relatively impervious soil. 6.4 SITE GRADING The risk of construction- induced slope instability at the site appears low provided cut and fill depths are limited. We assume the cut depths for the basement will not exceed about 14 feet. Hill depths for the driveway below the building are not expected to exceed 8 feet. Temporary excavation cut slopes should be made in accordance with OSHA requirements. A Type C soil may be assumed for temporary cuts (due to dip of bedding planes) and should be verified by the contractor's competent person. Fills should be limited to about 8 feet deep. Embankment fills should be benched into the portions of the hillside exceeding 20% grade. Compaction recommendations for structural fill are given in the table below. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil and compacting to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor dry density. Our recommendations for placement and compaction of structural fill at this site are shown below in Table 4. Table 4 - Compaction Recommendations . '_ ,.,....'YS .::.:.._ . . .�. ... .,'., v u^mN:';....+. .a.3— ST�.�....x*.N .�;t f.h.. .,Y =. iiYa.. seiY=.- s' �aeLbA" Jt: RYdC. S :1h'....vrf #- e�6a0fw'G•M�. H�•5+ -"� 'S�Fa .5:: F'dJmlht�'u Foundation wall backfill- pavement /slab areas, i 95% t3% Foundation wallbackfill - landscape areas, qo% 1 t3% Interior floor slab areas i Embankment fill 95% + f3% s 1. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. 2. Some settlement of deep wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is place correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. Grading above the wall should be able to account for some settlement. 3. Wall backfill and embankment fills should be placed and compacted in thin horizontal lifts. The thickness of the lift will be controlled by the required compaction level, material type and compaction equipment used. Typically, loose lift thickness range from 6 to 12 inches for proper compaction.. 4. All compaction and moisture levels shown are based on Standard Proctor (ASTM D -698) dry density. Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to i vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation or other means. The risk of slope instability will be increased if seepage is encountered in cuts and flatter slopes may be necessary. If seepage is encountered in permanent cuts, an parI - s - GORE RANGE ENGINEERING Project No. ii- i96.oi September 23, 2011 investigation should be conducted to determine if the seepage will adversely affect the cut stability. GRE should review site grading plans for the project prior to construction. 6.5 SURFACE DRAINAGE Proper surface drainage is extremely important in mountainous regions with respect to foundation performance and preventing basement /crawlspace wetting. The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained after the duplex has been completed: • Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. • The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should he sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first io feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first io feet in paved areas. A swale should be provided around the uphill side of the building to divert surface water. The grading around the residence should be able to account for some backfill settlement. • Wall backfill compaction recommendations are given in the "Site Grading" section above. • Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 7.0 RADON Radon is a gaseous, radioactive element that comes from the radioactive decay of uranium, which is commonly found in igneous rocks. The average indoor radon level in Summit County is 10 pCi /L (http:1JcouB1Y- radon.info/CO/Summit.html , which is above the recommended action level of 4 pCi /L as recommended by the Environmental Protection Agency. Testing for radon gas at the site is beyond the scope of this study. Due to the many factors that affect the radon levels in a specific building, accurate testing of radon levels is usually only possible after construction is complete. Typically, radon mitigation systems in Summit County consist of ventilation systems installed beneath lower level slabs and crawlspaces. The infrastructure for such a mitigation system can normally be installed during construction at a relatively low cost, which is recommended. The building(s) should be tested for radon once construction is complete. If test results indicate mitigation is required, the installed system can then be used for mitigation. We are not experts in radon testing or mitigation. If the client is concerned about radon, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. 8.0 LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance wits. generally accepted gcotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. No warranty is expressed or implied. Our recommendations and conclusions are based upon our field exploration, the proposed construction and our experience in the area. We have found that soil and groundwater conditions in this region can change abruptly within a relatively small area. Due to our mountainous environment, drastic spikes in groundwater levels can occur every year during seasonal runoff. For these reasons, we strongly recommend that our services are continued through the construction process (at an additional cost). If soil and /or groundwater conditions encountered during construction are different than what was encountered in our exploratory pits, changes to our recommendations may be required. We are not experts in determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Paged -6- GORE RANGE ENGINEERING Project No. 11- i96.oi September 23, 2011 This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. Changes to the building and /or site design may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. If you have any questions, please let us know. Respectfully, GORE RANGE ENGINEERING George W. Benecke III, P.E. Principal Reviewed by: JAD 3862'7 � ��ONA1.ti P8g0I-7- GORE RANGE ENGINEERING A- 0314'39• FOREST ROAD (50' R O.W.) R- 529.85' L= 30.03' NJ. T =15.00' SEWER MANHOLE 1220 EDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT POLE i3a2 BRG- N83'38'47'E INV- 8212.1 ASPHALT TRANSFORMER (TyP) e22ae C LEN- 30.00' MEAS, RW- 8221.3 ROAD FLOWLINE ELECTRIC eree s - - -- "---- - - - - -- /BASIS OF ELEVATION L DITCH METER 15317.6 x 5 -- 8230 � - %43 - - -- _ 0.4 a6 a5 6 -a2n - ---' �� WATER a6 92152 ------ ��,- -.. -'" � _ .•• a4 0.40.4 ROST as ' /1 INV. IN - " 4 230 a as 54'2 2 9117.0 0.4 22 0.6 °• 1.0 0.e °.{ 1 5.00 .4 0.d 1.1 0.6 1. .44 ,.o ' a4�a 1,59'2TE 10.9 cp BOULDER ° 0.4 0. 04 0.e 0.4 0.4 WALL o.4 3s_, ° as a5 0.4 a4 ,.a ae a4 ' 0.4 0 0.4 0.4 . FOUND �3 REBAR oe a� r i 0.5 ,• 6246.t� u4 - ki PA',, as 1.0 1.0 u' 42 e247.t a4 0.6 240 OA 'I // ae f _ e2a. °• 0.e 6246.5 x t.o as 5 a4 a2s0.o ST t.o Q4 am �`/i to - to tmo.t LI Q3 t.s A- s3.o assts BE 1.0 0.5 to 5 LA�N41 Me 9247.3 c. is s -Q5 a2re.a a4�as o � •rs � = " a5 2'� as 2x.4 1.o e a4 0.0 0 0.e ' o.e 4.c �rtAOSrort ae eu DA a 1.0 I aV4.3 + a4 Q,6 as x LOT a f,.o ae 52 Z 0.3893 0.e o.e a4 ROCK 1-0 Q /3.s' 3 STOR a4 v ae a o'6 0.e dOUTCROP 4 erss.� HOUSE 4 a a4 iry OT 5 / ,.o L tp 0. to ' = ENTRY 2 ele " 0.5 5 0.5750 ACRES (CALL) ae 8260 t 41.Y ROOF ON ' IT 2 1.0 a5 ,0 6U4.J 2.0' h1.0 v 62'Yd6 a Q6 1.0 as o. ae o.5 0e - $ �ae as os /� Qe g s�:4 I o.4 o.e 0.s A tp it .. 2a8 0 a tp s o.e ae � _ ` e2aa.t a6 ..40 IT 9e WALK/ as sexe.2 e2s e as ° o.e STEPS a STONE DECK/ 3T. o.a o.e ` pa PATIO 0.5 / a4 . O.e t6 a2u,., lae.a ae as 82ijiJ o.e . � as °' - a. o.s az as inn, ae a� as 0.• as � ,.030 a aa4 80' 0.6 0.e ee 0.6 Z ° ae t o.6 as ae 0.5 ID DA o.e / ax ' O.e + 0. Q4 G" S ONE 6 0.6 n / o.e 0. a WALK / 1.1 100.4 0.3 `J 0.0 0 ' a3 S S t - a 0. 0. �Q, n i• ,Q a4 0.5 ae s as 72 Id ° LOG o e ae CABI 2l0 ea T 4 o.3 o.6 as ENTRY o.6 2 c.e 0.4 to as 0. 0. o.5 UTILITY 10.0' _ EASEMENT �t•° s 9� S89'45'35W 145.95' 0e as 0.6 SPRI KLER FOUND #3 REBAR - -� 8250 V- / - `'_. - -b�a6 ga a3 4 1.0 75' NO NOT TO SCALE (BADLDY t3-2 EDGE LAWN ii GORE RANGE 446 FOREST ROAD PROJECT NO. it -1g6a ENGINEERING EXPLORATORY PIT LOCATIONS FIGURE PIT i DEPTH ELEVATION (�7 (FT) 0— 8264 r k 6 � 8259 10 8254 1� J [ Bottom of Pk ®13 feet. PIT 2 ELEVATION (FT) (FT) O r-- 8253 k L 6 8248 10 8243 Bottom of Pk ® ii feet. • No tree water encountered during excavation. NOTES: • DATE OF EXPLORATION: 09 /15/11 • PITS LOGGED BY: GO • RIG TYPE: BOBCAT • METHOD: MINI TRACKHOE • APPROXIMATE PIT LOCATIONS SHOWN ON FIGURE 1 • BOUNDARIES BETWEEN MATERIAL TYPES ARE APPROXIMATE AND ACTUAL CHANGES ARE GRADUAL • NO FREE WATER WAS ENCOUNTERED IN THE PITS AT THE TIME OF EXCAVATION. • WATER LEVELS CAN FLUCTUATE DURING TIMES OF HEAVY PRECIPITATION AND SEASONAL RUNOFF. • LD - LARGE DISTURBED SAMPLE, SD - SMALL DISTURBED SAMPLE, HD - HAND DRIVEN SAMPLE (RELATIVELY UNDISTURBED) 40 GORE RANGE 446 FOREST ROAD PROJECT NO. it- 196.01 ENGINEERING EXPLORATORY PIT LOGS FIGURE 2 3 € SOIL DESCRIPTION $ a Digging y m a � $ G j o. Z � ? � Z in $ Remarks � TOPSOIL; spry sand, organics, roots, moot, dark brown €my SMalf SAND AND SILT; slightly gravelly, krose, rndst brown 9.6 GRAVEL; silty, a _ Moesrste GM tty, apparent medium dense to dense, 1 10.9 I 132 8 I 33 51 moist, !I¢rht brown. Derived from s!ttr tore bedrocM,. ® 8.6', 3' thick layer of Basalt, hard, sllghtry moist, gray. Appears to De a sill, dipping with bedding planes 10.9 131 - 66 _ *0.1 SILTSTONE; weathered, fractured, medium hard, moist, ItgM OR Drown to dark brown with depth fSro In am ( y -Brown areas I I I Bedding planes down tOW81tl3 NW-W and dip similar to hillside. ' No tree water encountered during excavation. f � � � � p pigging � s s � � 3 301L DESCRIPTION � � I Olfacult f � � � � p pigging � s s � � 3 301L DESCRIPTION � &qmrl MMEM ME Him its C� NO! ri L mm=C= M Z= HEME-MEN mom =MMMIN -MM so= im me== MINES 0 Mw� 1.4 .18 AND GORE RANGE ENGINEERING 446 FOREST ROAD GRADATION I E. RESULTS maps OWN= --■lM==1M**qMMM1MM MEMO- MEN =0- 0 low, Mao Mon M' IM - - - - Pit No. Depth 78 Soil Type s1wone Moisture Content 10.9% Dry Density (pd) 130.7 Passing No. 200 Sieve . . .. ........ .. 65% Liquid Limit WA Plasticity Index WA Wetted at (psf) Soo Result .10% GORE RANGE 446 FOREST ROAD PROJECT NO. u-196zi E N G 1 N E E R 1 N JG SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS - FIGURE 4 GEOCOMPOSITE WALL DRAIN OR 12 INCHES OF DRAIN GRAVEL EXTEND TO WITHIN 1 TO 2 FEET OF FINISH GRADE. DO NOT EXTEND TO GROUND SURFACE. FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 14ON OR EQUIV.) 24" FOUNDATION WALL TOP OF SLAB OR CRAWLSPACE GRADE 18" MIN. SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 1H:1V DOWN AND AWAY FROM FOOTING TO PREVENT UNDERMINING THE FOOTING. 4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED DRAINPIPE SLOPED AT LEAST 1% TO A SUITABLE GRAVITY OUTLET OR SUMP AND PUMP SYSTEM. NOT TO SCALE NOTES: • THE UPPER 2 FEET OF WALL BACKFILL SHOULD CONSIST OF A RELATIVELY IMPERVIOUS ON-SITE SOIL, OR A PAVEMENT STRUCTURE SHOULD BE PROVIDED, TO REDUCE SURFACE WATER INFILTRATION. • PLEASE SEE THE SURFACE DRAINAGE SECTION OF THIS REPORT FOR SURFACE GRADING RECOMMENDATIONS. • IF FREE WATER IS ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION, IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO LOWER THE ELEVATION OF THE DRAINPIPE OR INCREASE DRAIN GRAVEL THICKNESS. GRE SHOULD BE CONTACTED DURING EXCAVATION TO RE- EVALUATE OUR RECOMMENDATIONS. p GORE RANGE 445 FOREST ROAD PROJECT NO. It- 195.Ot ENGINEERING TYPICAL UNDERDRAIN DETAIL FIGURE 5 CNJ( REScheck Software Version 4.4.3 Compliance Certificate Project Title: 446 Forest Road Energy Code: 2006 iECC Location: Vail, Colorado Construction Type: Single Family Conditioned Floor Area: 9554 ft2 Glazing Area Percentage: 18% Heating Degree Days: 9248 Climate Zone: 6 Construction Site: 446 Forest Road Vail, CO 91657 Owner /Agent: Michael English Vail Slopeside, LLC Edwards, CO 91632 970 -471 -0303 michael@englishdeveloper.com C,_mplian,ce� Passes on • • Compliance: 8.7% Better Than Code Maximum UA: 1744 Your UA: 1593 The % Better or worse Than Code index reflects how ciose to compliance the house is based on code trade -oft rules. It DOES NOT provide an estimate of energy use or cost relative to a minimum -code home. Designer /Contractor: Timothy Rosen Concept Mechanical, Inc. P.O. Box 1165 Avon, CO 81620 970- 949 -0200 conceptmechanical @comcast.net Ceiling 1: Cathedral Ceiling 5315 38.0 10.5 112 Wall 1: Wood Frame, 16" o.c. 10410 19.0 7.0 338 Window 1: Metal Frame with Thermal Break:Double Pane with 1131 0.350 396 Low -E SHGC: 0.19 Window 2: Metal Frame with Thermal Break:Double Pane with 759 0.450 342 Low -E SHGC: 0.19 Door 1: Solid 283 0.250 71 Basement Wall 1: Solid Concrete or Masonry 1552 11.0 8.0 54 Wall height: 11.0' Depth below grade: 11.0' Insulation depth: 11.0' Basement Wall 2: Solid Concrete or Masonry 228 11.0 8.0 10 Wall height: 10.0' Depth below grade: 6.0' Insulation depth: 10.0' Basement Wall 3: Solid Concrete or Masonry 66 11.0 8.0 3 Wall height: 10.0' Depth below grade: 3.0' Insulation depth: 10.0' Basement Wall 4: Solid Concrete or Masonry 63 11.0 8.0 3 Wall height: 10.0' Depth below grade: 7.0' Insulation depth: 10.0' Floor 1: Slab -On- Grade: Heated 325 8.0 228 Insulation depth: 4.0' Floor 2 Other Floor: Over Unconditioned Space 729 0.050 36 Compliance Statement: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the 2006 IECC requirements in REScheck version 4.4.3 and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the REScheck Inspection Checklist. Project Title: 446 Forest Road Report date: 04/16/12 Data filename: C: \Users \Concept Mechanical \Documents \REScheck \446 Forest Road.rck Page 1 of 2 Timothy J. Rosen, PE Name - Title Signature April 14, 2012 Date Project Title: 446 Forest Road Report date: 04 /16/12 Data filename: CAUsers \Concept Mechanical \Document:3 \REScheck \446 Forest Road.rck Page 2 of 2 CONCEPT MECHANICAL, INC. PLUMBING • HEATING • SYSTEM DESIGN P.O. BOX 1165 AVON, COLORADO 81620 PHONE: (970) 949 -0200 FAX: (970) 949 -0300 April 16, 2012 Mr. Ben Marion Resort Design Architects P.O. Box 6836 Avon, CO 81620 RE: 446 Forest Road; Plumbing and Heating Information Town of Vail Permit Process Dear Ben: We have completed the following plumbing and heating documents for the Town of Vail permit process: PLUMBING • Sanitary sewer piping schematic • Domestic hot and cold piping schematics • Natural gas piping schematic HEATING /COOLING • Heat loss summary and radiant floor schedule • Zoning and thermostat locations • Boiler, chiller, fan coil, fan and ERV schedules • HVAC schematics, plan view grille locations and Y2" scale mechanical room plan This project mechanical work will be performed on a design build basis. I will be sizing all heating and snowmelt pumps upon completion of rough in piping on the project. I have based my heat loss calculations on architectural documents, envelope R values, 70 degrees F interior temperature (50 degrees for the garage) and -20 degrees F exterior temperature. We will be responsible for the sizing of distribution piping to the radiant manifolds as well as coordinating the location of these manifolds with you. Please call with any questions or comments. Sincerely yours, WCV% 62 Timothy J. Rosen, PE; VP /Secretary Concept Mechanical, Inc. Encl. July 12, 2012 English and Associates, Inc. Attn: Michael English PO Box 2895 Edwards, Colorado 81632 Project No. i1- 196.01 '-��z -©,oG WLAddnm Sgo Brian Avenue, unit B Siiverthorne, Colorado $0499 PO Box S41-60 Silverthorne, Colorado 80497 Subject: Excavation Observation, Proposed Residence, Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Village, Filing 3, 446 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado. Dear Mr. English: At your request, Gore Range Engineering, LLC (GRE) visited the subject site on JulY3, 2012 to provide an opinion on whether the soils exposed at the site are suitable to support the proposed residence. Our conclusions and recommendations are presented in this report. We previously completed a Geotechnical Exploration Study at the site (see report dated September 23, 2012, Project No. ii- 196.oi). Proposed Construction: The residence will be a two story structure over a walkout basement with an attached garage. Wood frame construction will be used above grade with cast -in -place concrete foundation walls below grade. The lower level and garage floors will be slab -on- grade. Foundation loads are expected to be light to moderate. Field Observations and Reeommendations: At the time of our visit, the foundation excavation was generally complete and had been cut in four levels from roughly 4 to 15 feet below surrounding ground surface. The soils exposed at the excavation bottom generally consisted of siltstone bedrock. Dense, silty, sandy gravel was observed at subgrade in the shallower portions of the excavation. Water seepage was observed in the south basement cut slope up to roughly 6 feet above bottom of footing elevation. Soil nails with shoterete facing were being installed to retain the the east and south basement cut slopes. We observed strip drains were placed behind the shotcrete. We discussed our subsurface drainage recommendations while on site. Our recommendations were given in our previous Geotechnical Exploration Study. We recommended that the drain gravel placed against the south basement cut slope be extended 8 feet up the cut slope in the area of the seepage. We recommended the drain gravel thickness west of the seepage be at least 3 feet. The diameter of the drainpipe placed adjacent to the south basement wall should be increased to 6 inches. We recommended that the underdrain system above the basement (south) be routed to the east wall of the building to connect to the lower portion of the system. The underslab Gootechnicd 8ogl1"ertV (970) 485-4657 WWW40 oom Envirwn=td C m min& (370) 485.4248 Conn Fax: (888) 308-4186 J&wnd@iwmmr4ewWhw4ngam Ju}y is, 20x2 Page 2 O 2 gravel at the basement level should be connected to the underdrain system on the downhill side of the building to prevent water from being trapped beneath the slab. Foundation Itecamimendations: The sods and bedrock exposed at footing subgrade elevation are judged suitable to support spread footings designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. Softened and wet soils should be removed prior to concrete placement. Our minimum recommended footing widths are 16 inches for continuous walls and 24 inches for isolated pads. Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil ever above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported length of at least io feet. Other applicable recommendations given in our previous report should also be followed. Limitations: Our recommendations are being provided as a supplemental service under our Proposal to English and Associates, Inc. dated September i2, 2oii. Our recommendations submitted in this report are based on the conditions observed during our site visit, data from the previous subsurface exploration at the site and our experience in the area. If conditions encountered during construction appear different than those described in our reports, we should be notified for evaluation. If you have any questions, please let us know. spy, GORE RANGE ENGINEERING George W. Benecke III, P.E. Principal GORE RANGE ENGINEERING / cn 4 rr ' p > Z o n H �+ n z CD 1-1 W ° Z ° ° R. n h *tea rD .,, ccn n . rt a) O (1; 5,crg rrtD `C) trl fD n NJ a. n �. 5. rty d Qy "' p, -r Z.. O Po n. ` S 'w.i n N ° rD 'TI ¢ '� p� O o o n 0 .s rt Q,rt,H O W 0 0 y 'y U�Q r _p ' . 0 ._r°D. A) ! y '�• "L IA O rt `� ° •* H . n Cn Cf) ° w o - Q a /%1 C „„E n co H- 0 a, K 'r] 0 Z C) n r o a cn E r n Au n q rD Ly, rD NJ n o n p, z o z d �' CD O o ro n o •,., ,, O z r I Co ° ' g ° M o o ff° cn ;T , "J A 1 O 0. (D - 2F< 0"'_ 00 CDD w v a A N X As N ^ n ` l n - d co � 0 o O r,. CD Z c 'V U .1 d � t C .-r p n ° C7 P. rD 0 .< < P. (D rod U :°rt n - co P. a o z 0I I 1[ O • fD o • C o o w rt L= r CIQ O aQ .". W © C- f-4 r r n r O O 'CS 0- ro rt r a• Q" .fir • fD • O rt r. to • ou 0 rt n "x (D ro O o o 0 ao ro h rt rr i rw English & Associates Inc. Mr. Martin Haeberle, Thank you for taking the time to meet with me today to discuss 446 Forest Road. As per our conversation, the date that the landscape will be completed will be no later than July 31, 2014. At your earliest convenience, will you please have copy of the T.C.O. emailed to me for our files? Q1O�(./ 0 J O Regards, Michael English&Associates, Inc. PO Box 2395 Edwards,Colorado 811632 michael@englishdeveloper.com 970-471-0303 11f0'TE: THtS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON J�BSITE AT ALL TIMES �'�" ���� � �`��- ::- :. �>�'z�;;'�= rifE:>.� Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Job Address: Location......: Parcel No....: 446 FOREST RD VAIL 210107114005 Permit #: B12-0108 Project #: PRJ11-0704 Applied.....: 04/17/2012 Issued. . . : 05/11/2012 CONTRACTOR ENGLISH & ASSOCIATES INC 05/10/2012 Phone: 970-471-0303 MICHAEL ENGLISH PO BOX 2395 EDWARDS CO 81632 License: C000003492 OWNER VAIL SLOPESIDE LLC 04/17/2012 Phone: 970-471-0303 PO BOX 2395 EDWARDS CO 81632 Description: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (SFR) ON A TWO-FAMILY PRIMARY/SECONDARY LOT, WITH SKI WARMING HUT. Occupancy: R-3 Type Construction: VB Valuation: $3,760,298.00 "''"""`�*�*`** """` FEE SUMMARY '''''*"""""" `*""""'*"**'*`Y""�`**��""'*'*"""``*` Building Permit ----------->$15,686.40 Bldg Plan Check ----------> $10,196.16 Use Tax Fee-----------------------> $75,005.96 Electrical Permit ---------> $839.50 Elec Plan Check -----------> $545.68 Restuarant Plan Review--------> $0.00 Mechanical Permit ------> $2,900.00 Mech Plan Check ---------> $725.00 Additional Fees-------------------> $200.00PIumbing Permit --------> $2,475.00 Plmb Plan Check---------> $618.75 Recreation Fee--------------------> $1,081.20 I mrestigation-----------------------> $0.00 Will Call------------------------------> $20.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES--------------> 110,403.65 Payments-------------------------------> 110,403.65 BALANCE DUE------------------------> 30.00 �,......,,,,�.-.����,�..<...�., �,,.�....�����., �.-.,,,,,,, ,�,�,t.,�.�..-�...�,�,� t... K.�,.,> ...+,+.....,,�.,��.�,� ..............��,,,,.����, DECLARATIONS I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 dR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM. combination permit_012811 ,�-mm �.,,,,,, � . �. � .. ���� �� ���� � � �- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF Permit #: B12-0108 Owner: VAIL SLOPESIDE LLC Address: 446 FOREST RD VAIL Location: �,.,.,,,..,��,,,-......,.....�..�..,.,.,�<.,,.�......�.,,�,�-.-�,-...,.,�>,.>,,.t,�t,�,t����,.�.�...,�,�.,...,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�����,�„-...,. t.�,,,<.....�........,.,, t..,,,t,�.,.,,<,�. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 52 (FIRE 2002) Monitored fire alarm system required and shall comply with NFPA 72 (2002 ed.) and VFES Standards Cond: 53 (FIRE 2007) Monitored fire sprinkler system required and shall comply with NFPA 13 (2007) and VFES Standards. Cond: CON0012548 Fire department connections required at street. Shall be interconnected to standpipe hose connections at house. Required due to limited access, distance of staging to house. combination permit_012811 �� �....; • .� � � �� �� �� � :� *t*������<����*��*�****�***�����*****�**��*�������*******�*�*�������#**�������***#,��#�����*���*****��*„���,�***�������>,**��*�,.���**�*�*�����,�**����� REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES Permit #: B12-0108 Address: 446 FOREST RD VAIL Owner: VAIL SLOPESIDE LLC Location: *�����**���**********���*�����****������.�*********�����**�*********�����******���*�*********�����***�*�*���*******����**�*****������****�****�**�*�* Item: 00010 BLDG-FOOTING 07/17/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments: soils report in file 09/17/2012 By: mdenney Action: AP Comments: planter wall, retaining wall and wall at rear patio. Item: 00020 BLDG-Foundation/Steel 07/30/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: See palns for areas completed 08/07/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP 09/21/2012 By: mdenney Action: AP Comments: rear patio wall and retaining wall. 09/28/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments: Front retaining 10/16/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments: retaining wall at NW side Item: 00030 BLDG-Framing Item: 00050 BLDG-Insulation Item: 00060 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail Item: 00502 PW-Rough Driveway Grade Item: 00503 PW-Final Driveway Grade Item: 00501 PW-Access/Staging/Erosion Item: 00532 PW-TEMP. C/O Item: 00539 PW-FINAL C/O Item: 00021 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan Item: 00022 PLAN-ILC FRAMING Item: 00534 PLAN - FINAL C/O Item: 00120 ELEGRough 08/15/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Temp power Item: 00200 MECH-Rough 09/05/2012 By: mdenney Action: PI Comments: spiral duct for combustion air. 09/28/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Lower level tested at 100 Psi 10/03/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: level 100 infloor heat 10/10/2012 By: JRM Action: PI Comments: ski hut and rear lower patio 100 # air test Item: 00210 PLMB-Underground 08/17/2012 By: JRM Action: AP Comments: 5# AIR TEST 09/05/2012 By: mdenney Action: AP Comments: 3" drain for ski hut bathroom. 09/17/2012 By: mdenney Action: AP Comments: Primary laundry, ski hut bathroom and mech room. 09/19/2012 By: mdenney Action: PI Comments: combination permit_012811 Underground complete except for floor drain in garage. Item: 00220 PLMB-Rough/D.W.V. Item: 00230 PLMB-Rough/Water Item: 00240 PLMB-Gas Piping Item: 00315 PLMB-Gas Piping Item: 00250 PLMB-Poof/Hot Tub ltem: 00390 MECH-Final Item: 00290 PLMB-Final Item: 00190 ELEC-Final Item: 00090 BLDG-Final Item: 00070 BLDG-Misc. 08/29/2012 By: mdenney Action: AP Comments: Perf pipe for Rado mitigation system under slab. combination permit_012811 NOTE:� THIS PERM/T MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ,. ra�r���,�. Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Permit #: B12-0108 Project #: PRJ11-0704 Job Address: 446 FOREST RD VAIL Applied.....: 04/17/2012 Location......: Issued. . . : 08/01/2013 Parcel No....: 210107114005 CONTRACTOR ENGLISH &ASSOCIATES INC 05/10/2012 Phone: 970-471-0303 MICHAEL ENGLISH PO BOX 2395 � EDWARDS CO 81632 License: C000003492 OWNER VAIL SLOPESIDE LLC 04/17/2012 Phone: 970-471-0303 PO BOX 2395 EDWARDS CO 81632 Description: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (SFR) ON A TWO-FAMILY PRIMARY/SECONDARY LOT,WITH SKI WARMING HUT. Occupancy: R-3 Type Construction: VB Valuation: $3,760,298.00 ..................�„�...........,,.......,.__._......x....,.......__......,........ FEE SUMMARY ....,._..___.....,....,......._,_._..........,,...,__.................,__...... Building Permit-----------> $15,686.40 Bldg Plan Check----------> $10,196.16 Use Tax Fee-----------------------> $75,005.96 Electrical Permit---------> $839.50 Elec Plan Check-----------> $545.68 Restuarant Plan Review--------> $0.00 Mechanical Permit------> $2,900.00 Mech Plan Check---------> $725.00 Additional Fees--------------------> $794.38 Plumbing Permit--------> $2,475.00 Plmb Plan Check---------> $618.75 Recreation Fee--------------------> $1,081.20 Investigation-----------------------> $0.00 Will Call------------------------------> $20.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES--------------> 111,218.03 Payments-------------------------------> 111,218.03 BALANCE DUE-----------------------> $0.00 ...........................................................................................................................................................«.....,.....,,.__.......... DECLARATIONS I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM -4:00 PM. combination permit_012811 � � r ! �������� �j . •xxx���w...:r+�.�...xxw������w,.w,r,rx��x:rxxx.xx��x+v.����:.e,ee.xxxxx.�x+rw+.x+w,exx.v.xx.r�+x+x,rww,rwrrx,r.xxxxx+x+.+.+.,rxw�v.,r,r,r,r,r:rxxxxxxx+��,r,+,rx+x+.wxw�w�s.s.rs,..,r..x..xs.s.s.xrr,r.,r.+.+.+.xx+�s.v..ew.xw� CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF � Permit#: B12-0108 Address: 446 FOREST RD VAIL ' Owner: VAIL SLOPESIDE LLC Location: ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 52 (FIRE 2002) Monitored fire alarm system required and shall comply with NFPA 72 (2002 ed.) and VFES Standards Cond: 53 (FIRE 2007) Monitored fire sprinkler system required and shall comply with NFPA 13 (2007) and VFES Standards. Cond: CON0012548 Fire department connections required at street. Shall be interconnected to standpipe hose connections at house. Required due to limited access, distance of staging to house. combination permit_012811 � � level 100 infloor heat 10/10/2012 By: JRM Action: PI Comments: ski hut and rear lower patio 100#air test 10/26/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Driveway snowmelt 02/11/2013 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: snowmelt 02/13/2013 By: mdenney Action: PI Comments: chiller and heat piping - no infloor at this time. 02/22/2013 By: JRM Action: PI Comments: APPROVED 4 FIREPLACE ROUGHS 02/26/2013 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: in floor heat tested at 100 psi 03/01/2013 By: JRM Action: PI Comments: SUPPLY AND RETURN DUCTING ONLY 06/20/2013 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: pool deck snowmelt 07/18/2013 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: garage infloor heat Item: 00210 PLMB-Underground 08/17/2012 By: JRM Action: AP Comments: 5# AIR TEST' 09/05/2012 By: mdenney Action: AP Comments: 3" drain for ski hut bathroom. 09/17/2012 By: mdenney Action: AP Comments: Primary laundry, ski hut bathroom and mech room. 09/19/2012 By: mdenney Action: PI Comments: Underground complete except for floor drain in garage. 02/06/2013 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Water main tested at 100 psi 02/15/2013 By: JRM Action: AP Comments: DECK DRAINS APPROVED Item: 00220 PLMB-Rough/D.W.V. 10/31/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: hot tub 02/13/2013 By: mdenney Action: AP Item: 00230 PLMB-Rough/Water 02/13/2013 By: mdenney Action: AP Item: 00240 PLMB-Gas Piping Item: 00315 PLMB-Gas Piping 10/19/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: exterior 02/13/2013 By: mdenney Action: AP Comments: all interior gas piping Item: 00250 PLMB-Pooi/Hot Tub Item: 00390 MECH-Final Item: 00290 PLMB-Final Item: 00190 ELEC-Final Item: 00090 BLDG-Final Item: 00070 BLDG-Misc. 08/29/2012 By: mdenney Action: AP Comments: Perf pipe for Rado mitigation system under slab. 03/01/2013 By: JRM Action: AP Comments: U VALUE OF WINDOWS INSPECTED AND APPROVED .32 combination permit_012811 a � � ��1l� V��� ! ,,...**.,««*****,.*******«««**,*«************«**«*********««««****«***«*,.****,.***««««****�****«««*«*********««.*******««*«******«***.,**********«*.,«**«** REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES Permit#: 612-0108 Address: 446 FOREST RD VAIL Owner: VAIL SLOPESIDE LLC Location: *******«.�*****„**«*««**,,.*.****.*****,***,.*******«*,,,,,,*,,,...*..,***„*««*„�******..,*********«««***.***„«****�***�*««**.,*...�***«***«******«************ Item: 00010 BLDG-FOOTING 07/17/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments: soils report in file 09/17/2012 By: mdenney Action: AP Comments: planter wall, retaining wall and wall at rear patio. Item: 00020 BLDG-Foundation/Steel 07/30/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: See palns for areas completed 08/07/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP 09/21/2012 By: mdenney Action: AP Comments: rear patio wall and retaining wall. 09/28/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments: Front retaining 10/16/2012 By: sgremmer Action: AP Comments: retaining wall at NW side 10/31/2012 By: sgremmerAction: AP Comments: hot tub Item: 00030 BLDG-Framing 03/01/2013 By: JRM Action: AP Item: 00050 BLDG-Insulation 04/08/2013 By: sgremmer Action: AP Item: 00060 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail 01/17/2013 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: fireplace chase 04/18/2013 By: md Action: AP Item: 00502 PW-Rough Driveway Grade Item: 00503 PW-Final Driveway Grade Item: 00501 PW-Access/Staging/Erosion Item: 00532 PW-TEMP. C/O Item: 00539 PW-FINAL C/O Item: 00021 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan 02/28/2013 By: Warren Action: AP Item: 00022 PLAN-ILC FRAMING 02/28/2013 By: Warren Action: AP Item: 00534 PLAN - FINAL C/O Item: 00120 ELEC-Rough 08/15/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Temp power � 10/31/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: hot tub bonding 03/07/2013 By: sgremmer Action: AP Item: 00200 MECH-Rough 09/05/2012 By: mdenney Action: PI Comments: spiral duct for combustion air. � 09/28/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Lower level tested at 100 Psi 10/03/2012 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: combination permit_012811 � ***++*************************************************************************************** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprinted on 08-01-2013 at 14:10:57 08/O1/2013 Statement ********************************************+****************+***********+***********+****** Statement Number: R130001109 Amount: $814 .38 08/Ol/201302: 10 PM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: CG Notation: visa michael english ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B12-0108 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-071-1400-5 Site Address: 446 FOREST RD VAIL Location: Total Fees: 111, 218.03 This Payment: $814 .38 Total ALL Pmts: 111, 218.03 Balance: $0.00 ****************+*************************************************************************** ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------------- ------------------------------ ------------ EP 00100003111100 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 287.50 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 406. 88 UT 11000003106000 USE TAX 4% 120.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- CALL AP -iL`i C°I�DVER� WMC _ % 440Y Department of Community Development 0 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 TOWN OF VA # L '� Tel: 970.479.2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator TRANSMITTAL FORM Use this form when submitting additional information for planning applications or building permits. This form is also used for requesting a revision to building permits. A two hour minimum building review fee of $110 will be charged upon reissuance of the permit. Application /Permit #(s) information applies to: O� O g (Z -70 Lf, Project Street Address: (Number) (Street) (Suite #) Attention C) Revisions p Response to Correction Letter Wa ched co py of correction letter rred Submittal er Building /Complex Name: Q�?) Q�y �. Description of Transmittal/ List of Changes, Items Attached: Applicant Information (architect, contractor, owner /owner's rep) Contact Name: m t cvlik< < E V`S 1� S h Address: 7 0 ' 5C � 1Z � S� City Eat� Y_� 5 State: (, d Zip: V0 Contact Name: -tic�,IGt'C Contact Phone: \10 _ -`-1 I C) Contact E -Mail: 1 *11% cv\ G �OYh hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances own ap ca ereto. X Owner /Owner's Repre ntative Signat re (Required) For Office Use Only: Fee Paid: Received From: Cash Check # CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # exp. date: Authorization # �j'J i' v t V r e`� � d1 t I. to ✓' !1 C c n O f I G c n c. (use additional sheet if necessary) Building Permits: Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building: Plumbing: Electrical: Mechanical: Total: Date Received: $0 OCT 0 2 2012 �F TOWN OF VAIL Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970 - 479 -2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator TRANSMITTAL FORM Revision Submittals: 1. "Field Set" of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved & the permit is re- issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are $55.00 per hour (2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. Permit #(s) information applies to: dAl2O /0Q Attention: Project Street Address: 4.16 Xia&T 26�_. (Number) (Street) (Suite #) Building /Complex Name: Contractor Information Business Name: Business Address: City Contact Name: Contact Phone: Contact E -Mail: State: Zip: hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of_t4sT4wnaid)licable thereto. Owner /Owner's Representative Signature (Required) Applicant Information Applicant Name: Applicant Phone: Applicant E -Mail: For Office Use Only: Fee Paid: Received From: Cash Check # _ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # exp. date: ( Revisions ( Response to Correction Letter _attached copy of correction letter ( ) Deferred Submittal ( ) Other Description / List of Changes: 14 POC S F_ 7^0 .�' 6;4J 9:s 7—E» C,OA (use additional sheet if necessary) Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) Building: $ Plumbing: $ Electrical: $ Mechanical: $ Total: $ Date Received: ID C�C�LUMG� D MAY 0 s 2012 D f Vi RESORT DESIGN ARCHITECTS TO: Martin Haeberle COMPANY: Town of Vail Community Development Department ADDRESS: 75 South Frontage Rd. West Vail Colorado RE: Revised Permit Drawings CC: Michael English We are sending via Hand Delivered TRANSMITTAL FROM: Tom Frye DATE: May 7, 2012 JOB NAME: 446 Forest Road JOB NUMBER: 23374 ® Attached ❑ Originals ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Specifications ❑ Other ❑ Under separate cover ® Prints ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Change Order ❑ COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION Revised Permit Drawings: A1.0 Cover Sheet, Al.1 GRFA Plans & Summary, 4 5/8/12 A1.2 GRFA Plans, A1.2a Roof/Ridge Elevations, A2.0 Site Plan ❑ For review and comment ® For approval ❑ For your information ❑ For your use ® As requested NOTE: Revised drawings submitted as requested and approved by Bill Gibson, TOV Planning Department as replacements for sheets previously submitted on 4.16.12. Permit application number: B 12 -0108. www.ResortDesign.com I California: 625 Market Street Fourteenth Floor • San Francisco, CA. 94105 • 415.3924433 • Fax 415.392.4454 I Colorado: 30 Benchmark Road Suite 220 • Avon, CO 81620 • 970.949.0899 • Fax 970.949.0933 Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road TOWN OF VAIL ; va�i, co s�ss� Tel: 970.479.2128 www.vailgov.com I Development Review Coordinator ' Ti�At�iSN�i i�i'i�� F� -('cP� Use this form when submitting additional information for planning applications or building permits. This form is also used for requesting a revision to building permits. A two hour minimum building review fee of$110 will be charged upon reissuance of the permit. Application/Permit#(s) information applies �: Attention: ( ) Revisions ��a ` d��g ��U � O Response to Correction �etter attached copy of correction letter ( )Deferred Submittal ��S � � ` ���� ( )Other Project Street Address: 1 �1�t� �-O�' �,S( �L7��� (Number) (Street) (Suite#) Building/Complex Name: �� h�� � Description of TransmittaU List of Changes, Items Attached: Applicant Information ��/�T�ov� ��(��GQ s%� Q �L %«�,,� �� GbQ� . �(�/P�o.DC-✓` GcJGi-/I�� � ��_ (archite�contrac owner/owner's rep) --T Li ��Q��'S /� � Q li��r��,r �U/'i!l C,-1 , �l nU i� -�00 y�l. Contact Name: ,��C�O r'� - , �e s cti C'� u�� 4��c�w � � �. `�'6 Address: _/�C�,� �a,�/J / �l o'L City ✓ State: Zi ���'� � �� � lO/�i1�'S , `7�0C.5 dQ . t P�✓.%(:-t, �� �c� P:�— ..�t� e � f %s c,�r,�-�►`�J� ��>��, ContaCt Name: � J1 /'� � (use additional sheet if n ces� sary) Contact Phone: �7 � ntb`F � � a, ( Building Permits: P Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations(Labor�Materials) Contact E-MaiL �-U�/'Lf1c�����'�(�� h��0,i � �'-� �DO NOT include original valuation) I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out Building: $ in full the information required,completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to Plumbing: $ compty with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according Electrical: $ ('� OO G to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved,Intemational Building and Residential Codes and other Mechanical: $ Xrdinances of t Town�cable thereto. Total: $ Owner/Owner' Representative Signature(Required) Date Received: � � � � od � For Ot�tc Lsc Unly: ��� �2013 Fee Paid: Received From: --- - TOWN OF VAIL -. -� -��;�. L� ���.�_��. �oriza�on� HCE USE ONLY HCE No. Location Nleter Location Approved - Yes � No 0 Engineer Secondary ped. - New 0 Existing � Date Secondary Voitage Trans Co # KVA: HOLY CROSS ENERGY RESIDENTIRL - LOQd fNFOf�MATICSN AND METER LUCATION FORM Is this: � Temp Service �Temp in Perm Position �]Temp to Perm � Permanent Position Applicant Name �{��� .�f c���.C'r�� � C �i _ Phone ���l Ca `f� � C��C`� ,� SUBDIVISION , LOT , BLOCK , FILING PHYSICAL ADDRESS OF PROJECT �/�/� ��/'�sT 1��Q�C LOCATION: Within City Limits? No / � City of V Q : � If location not in city limits please provide county, township, range and section. Secondary Voltage: /,� r� /.��c� Phase � Secondary Wire Size .�S`C� / Number of conductors per phase r.�. Cable Distance{Transformer to meter) ft Meter Location: 0 Pole �Structure 0 Pedestal i;�3 NiJMBERS ON FACE OF TRANSFORMER(upper left and right corners) /�� �LI e � Nearby existing meter number ' ' •- , `'� �;'c ; <"s�-; ��., . 200 amp or less, self-contained meter socket 400 Amp, self-contained 1� service �/�-�`� Main Fuse/Breake�•Size�;i�o CT's requii•ed? _ �� Photo Voltaic �vn Calculated Maximum Demand (NEC) �2. kW Service Size C)� (amps) ELECTRICIAN ���;,, c/jJ�������c= �.vr, PHONE �70 9,2 C� �g� NAME OF HOLY CROSS ENERGY ENGINEER CONTACTED �O� �QD T�O,��' SERVICE REQUESTED: � New Service Upgrade House(sq.ft) %Df�'�Xj Modular(size) Other EL�CTRIC LOAD INFORIV�ATION: Lighting ��- kW Range: Electric .S kW each(Number f )or Gas_� Clothes Dryer: Electric S kW each(Number -n�-- )or Gas Heat: Electric kW(Type 1, Natural Gas/Propaoe � Small appliance y�S kR', Laundry J kW, Air Conditiooing /� kW Water Heater: Electric kW each{Number ,Natural Cas�ropane / Ot6er Major Electric Loads Snowmelt/Drive,Walkway,Gutter heat tape @ �-� (kR'), 08,0,,,o g l � -- D14 G �� � / I� TOWN OF VC' Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970.479.2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator TRANSMITTAL FORM Use this form when submitting additional information for planning applications or building permits. This form is also used for requesting a revision to building permits. A two hour minimum building review fee of $110 will be charged upon reissuance of the permit. Application /Permit #(s) information applies to: [ � - o► o g Attention: 0 Revisions O Response to Correction Letter B2 LOC,. f2attached copy of correction letter Q Deferred Submittal ?L 14Ni•1Ig IQ}Other Zl,C Project Street Address: � y b REAT R SD ofil-) (Number) (Street) (Suite #) Building /Complex Name: Applicant Information (architect, contractor, owner /owner's rep) Contact Name: C& EAGLGIA £ 8S 12 - /0 C. Address: PL Rax a 395 City _euoRQ,O State: CD zip:`&�3.Q_ Contact Name: m) C l Al TLI S 14 Contact Phone: 970 —H7[ - D_30A ContactE -Mail: ry)i P_IQe,rvaI' %c.�rApvpInoic c. corn I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. Owner /Owner's Representative Signature (Required) For Office Use Only: Fee Paid: Received From: Cash CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Authorization # Check # exp. date: Description of Transmittal/ List of Changes, Items Attached: -c. L. 0- . (use additional sheet if necessary) Building Permits: Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) (DO NOT include oriqinal valuation) Building: Plumbing: Electrical: Mechanical: Total: Date Received: $0 D [RadIE FEB 27 2013 CV TOWN OF VA IL