HomeMy WebLinkAboutBIGHORN SUB RESUB OF LOT 20 PARCEL D LOT 20-1 20-2 LEGAL.pdfoormirTY (f, .vELoPt Err
Design Review Board
ACTTOI{ FORtrf
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tef : 970.479.2139 tax:. 970.479.2452
web: www.vailgov,com
Project Name:
Prcject Description:
HORTON NEW CONSTRUCNON DRB Number: DRts080031
FINAL APPROVAL FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENCE
Pafticlpants:
OWNER HORTON FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUS 02111/2008
6610 ABERDEEN AVE
DALI.AS
IX 75230
APPLICANT K.H. WEBB ARCHITECTS PC O2|IU2008 Phone: 970-477-2990
710 WEST UONSHEAD CrR, UNIT A
VAIL
co 81657
License; C000001627
ARCHITECT K.H, WEBB ARCHITECTS PC 021t112008 Phone: 970-477-2990
710 WEST UONSHEAD CIR, UNIT A
VAIL
co 816s7
License: C000001627
Project Address: 4284 COLUMBINE DR VAIL Locatlon: 4284 COLUMBINE DR
Legal Description: Lot: D Block Subdivision: STREAMSIDE DUPLOGS
Parcel Number: 2101-122-2900-5
Comments: SEE CONDffiONS
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Dantas
Second By: DuBois
Vote: 5-0-0
Conditions:
Action: APPROVED
Date of Approvah 03/05/2008
Cond: 8
(P|-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review commlttee(s).
EnWi 03105/2008 By: RLF Action: COND 1. The applicant shall provide
a tree preservation report at the time of building permit submittal.
2. The applicant shall not remove any trees from adjacent parcels.
Cond:0
(P|-AN); DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
(PLAN): DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of
approval, pursuant to the Vail Town Code, Chapter 12-3-3; APPEALS.
C.ond: 202
(PLAN): Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following
the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is
commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion.
Planner: MCHEL FRIEDE DRB Fee Paid; 9650,00
Feb 07 0B 09:28o p.3
New Construction
Application for Design Review
Departrnent of C-omrnunity Devdopment
75 South Fron@e Road, Vail, Colorado 91
tel: 97O.4D.2L28 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.com
Genenl Information:
All proje$ requiring design revlew must receive approral prior to submiting a building
refer to.the submisil requirements for the particulai approval that is requeieo. Fn cannot be acaepted until all required inFormation is rieived by the dmmunity oevUbpment Oepartnfint, ini project may also need to be reviewed by the Torn Council and/or the Planning and Envirmmental e-ommission.Des[gn t€view apPtovat lapses unl... a buildlng pennit is iss[ed and ojnstructlrn @mrncnccs wathin one year of the approval.
Description of the Request:
i:'; i I ZUfi8 u
Lo@tionoftheProposaf: Lot#glock: -subdivision:
Physical Address:ilq{-
Pareel No.:
Zoning:
q)
o
@ o o
(l)
-_t
1 8lL/
(Contact Eagle C.o. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
tlame(s) of Owner(s):
Mailing Mdress:
Owne(s) Signature(s):
Name of Applicant:
E-mail Address:
npe of Revlew and Fee:
tr Signs
E Coneptual Review
,X, Neu Construction O Addltion
tr Minor Afteratim
(multFfa mily/commercia l)
E Minor Alteration
(dngle.fam i lylduplex)
E Charqes to Apgoved Plans
D Separation Request
t l'l tl-
Phone:
$50 Plus $1.(x) per squitre foot of total sign area.
Itlo Fee
$650 For @nstrucflon of a new building or derno/rebuild.
$300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
com mercial building (indudes 250 additions & interior conversions).$250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, suctt as,
re.ruofirtg, pairting, windo,v additions, hndscaping, fences and
retaining walls, eb.$20 fur minor dtanges to buildings and site Improvements, srcfi as,
re-roofng, pairting, whctolv additiom, hndsaping, f€nces and
rebining walls, eE.S20 For revi$ons to plans already approved by plannlng Staff or the
Deign Rwiew 8oard.
No Fee
ForOfficepslenly?-- --= 7>*7
Fee hkJ: b > 'd chect f'rof-. - ' __ gv:
ll".*lngo"t, 7*F- 0B *r*o)
'i,l*'l** * * **+ ** *****+*** * * ***** ********** * *** * ** *** ***,1++*++++************** *** ******** ***+++*
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statement
** * ** ** ***** * **** * * *****+* * *+*+ + ** ** * * *{.******* * ** ** ** * * *******+++* + ****************i.*'t* **'}*
Statement Number: R080000152 Amount: $650.00 02/LL/2OO,L1 :44 AM
Payment Method:
ARCIIITECTS
Check Init: iIS
Notati-on: 2349lK.H. WEBB
DRBo80031 1\4)e 3 DRB - Ner,r Construction
$6s0. oo
$550.00
$o. oo
* *** * * *** ****** *****,! * ****+,1*** +* ** **** ****,* ** *+* ** * * **f***** ********** *** *+* *+***** * *****,!*
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code naar-ri rr+ i ^n Current Pmts
DR 00100003tL2200 DESIGN REVIEW FEES 650.00
Permit No:
Parcel No:
Site Address :
IJOcat.ion :
This Fayment :
270I - t22 - 2900 -5
4284 COLIJMBINE DR VAIIJ
4284 COI.,IJMB INE DR
$6s0.00
Total Fees:
TOIA1 ,AIJIJ PMTS ]
Balance :
*$f
D \iletland Delineation
Parecl I), Streamside Duplexes
Prepared for:
Ranch Creek Land Company
Mr. David Hilb
1592 Matterhom Circle
Vail, Colorado 81657
Prepared by:
Daiva Katieb, Principal
Watershed Environmental Consultants, Inc.s'
Town of Vail, Colorado
November 12,2004
sb{
4)
N,-P.O.Box3722
Eagle, Colorado 81631
I.
II.
III.
ry.
V.
vI.
VII.
TABLE OTCONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
MBfiIODS
DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA.
VEGETATION
HYDROLOGY
RESIILTS
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
APPENDICIES
LISITOFTABLES
Tablp 1, Wetland Plant Species List,
Parcel D, Streamside Duplo<es..... . . ..,.........
LIfITOX'flGURES
FigurE 1. Projectlocationmap,,...........2. Up$reamviewofriparian, Wetland L.......,.,,..,.
3. Downstream view of riparian, Wetland A
at the margin of uplands on the property... .
4. View of oristing concrete slab orossing..
5. ViewofWetlandB................
LIST OFAPPENDICNS
Appendix
A, Photogrophs ofstudy site,........,,..,B. Datoforms,
C. Wetland delineation map for
Parcel D, Streamside Duplexes....... ...,
Page
1
I
I
J
J
4
4
5
5
6
Page
3
Pa&E
2
7
7
8
8
Page
6
9
18
I. INIROIIUCTION:
Mr. David Hilb of Ranch Creek Land Company, 1592 Matterhorn Circl€, Vail' Colorado 81657
has reqgested a wotland delineation on Parcol D of the Streamside Duplores subdivision in Vail,
Colorado. The vacant property (County Parcel #2101 I 2229005), cunently owned by John
Digby sorenron of oklehoma city, oklahoma, is located at l2S4Columbine Drive. The
bbslrt,p$.efuNuf
12, Towithip 5 South, Range 80lVest. Bighorn Creek and Gore
property is .5?.02 rcres.
The site is locsted in Sodion
October 21, 2004.
Creek ftont tho propfiy near the confluence oftlc two perennial streams. Total stream frontage
is approxim*e\idfeei. Watershed Environmoeitnl Conrultartq.Inc: (tl/EC) has.svsluetcd the
ptoi,unty fot tltiffience of wetlands and waters of the U.S.; a eito visit was conducted on
fi. METHODS:
Wotlands were evaluated by ernploying procedwos descfib€d in ths U'S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) Wetlands Dolineation lvlarnral (1937). A roltine on-site inspeotion for
wd'land urcas equatto or less then 5 acror in size was conduct€d. Wetland boundories wers
based on the prwalence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soilq and indicators of wetland
lrydrology. Section III, Oesirtpion of study fuoa, of this report rscords the evaluation of the
vegetatio4 roils, and laydrolory oftle site.
Field forms for the vegetation, roils, and lnydrologil are included in Appendix B. Table I lists tho
dominant vegetation observed on tho project rite. Appendix A contgrnr photographs of tho site.
The wetland boundaries were identifiod in the field with flags labeled alphanumerically. Theso
flagged points were surveyed and the maps are provided in Appendix C'
IIL, DASCRIPTIONOTSTUDYAREA:
Climatic data for the project site is unflvailable; howwer, values have been obtained at station
COZ4S4,Eagle FAA Airport, elevation 6,500 fest" located approxiqatgly 32 miles, rtraightJine
distenc€,we;t ofthe prqiect site. The recorded mean annual precipitation is 10'66 inohos and the
rnean annual temperature is 42.9" 4 both valuos wprc evgraged ovor 47 years gfrecord (Wostem
Regional ClimateCenter, 2004). Precryitation ir rel*ivcly evenly distributed tluoughout the
ysar, wittr slightly higher amounts occuning in latc sumtrr and sutumn. The growing l€asonl
days with the low temperature abovo 32o F, is less than 90 days.
I
WetloilDelineation
ParcelDStreansi& hphws
fi,lttd
l'*flt||dnir[140{.dBl|.li.IOra*l.(iit di{.Fglirdlt DO
Figure 1. Project looation map.
2
WetlardDelircation
Pwcel D Stea nst& Dryleres
$on-s
ihe Natural Resource Cons€rvation Service (NRCS) has not mapped ths soils in this immediate
looation; howwe4 much of the rrrryedgites withifi the alluviat areas along Gore Creek have
been mapped as Forsey cobbly loam. It is a$sntmed that this soil associstion is continued onto the
project site. Other mapped soil units on the ban*s of Gore Creek include Jerry-Millerlake loams
and toniorthents-Camborthids-rock outcrop. All of there mapped soil series are Argic
Cryoborols.
The Fomey cobbly loam unit may have inclusions of sendstone rock outcrop, which compose
approximately 5 percent ofth€ total acreage. This asrociation is typically found on alluvial fane,
mountainsides, anA riAges, The parent material is alluvium, residuum and colluvium derived
from mixed mineralogy. These soils are deep and well drained with a moderate permeability.
The soils observed on site were well drained, No rock outcrops are located on the parcel. The
gurface leyer ofthe soils were faidy uniform, mostly with only onq A, horizon. Deeper horizo-ns
could nore,flectively be obs€rved because ofthe rock content in the soil, About 25 percent ofthe
observed profiles were composed of stones and cobbles, No mottling or gleyngwas observed
throughout tho profilor.
VEGETATION
Dominant nativg upland grasscs charactey'lze a large portion of vegetatton on the site, Blue
spwce (Ptcea ptngetr),willow (Saltx spp,), and other woody and herbaceous wetlond plants
characteriaedtheripuianareas. Woods rose(Rosawoodsti), cowparsnip Qleracleum
sphondyliun), serviceberry (Amelotchier alntfuia), and graoses composed the vegetation within
the transitio'n zone between wetlands nnd uplands.
The fotlowing table lists the plant speciee that were observed on and near the project site.
Table 1, - Wetland Plont Speoies List, Parcel D, Streamside Dupleires
Scientific Common Family Odgin* Wetland**
Name- Narne - Status-
Achillea millefoltum Wostern Yarrow Asteraceae N FACU NNL
N FACW
N FACU.
NNL N OBL I FACU
N FACU
N FAC
NNL I FACU
N FAC.
N FACU-
N UPL
Achnathenm nelrcnll Cofumbia needlegrasr Poaceae
AIms incano Mountain alder Betulsceae
Amelanchler alnilolia Serviceberry
Epllobiam angustllolium Fireweed
Heracleum ryhottdyllam Cow parrnip
Bromts cafirwfrrs
Cwex aqntilis
Dactylls glomerata
Koeleriumarantha
Phleum pratense
Picea prngens
Pirwc contorta
Pufendleriua
Ivflountain brome
Water sedgo
Orchardgrars
Prairie junegrass
Timothy'
Blue spruce
Lodgcpole pine
Muttongram
Posac€ao
Poaceae
Clpuaceae
Poaceae
Onagraceae
Apiaceac
Poaceae
Poaceae
Pinwae
Pinaceae
Poaceas
3
lletlndDelircdton
Parcel D Streansi& Dtrpl*es
Name -Name Stdus-
Table l, (continued)
Scientific
Purshta trldpntats
Ribes cerceum
Racawoodsli
Salix eactwoodtae
Cornmon
Antelopo bitterbrush
Wsx currant
Woods rose
Mountainwillow
Family Origin*Wetland*
Popiastremioifus Asp6n Salicaccae
Pseudoroegneria spican Bluebunoh wheatgrass Poaceae
Poaceae
Grossularisaeoe
Roeaceae
Salicacoae
Poaceae
Poaceae
N FAC
N TJPL
NNL N I.]PL
N FAC-
N OBL
N FAC
NNL
NL
NI
I]PL
FACU
Sporobofus airoldes Alkali saoaton
StiW comqta Needleandthread
*Oriein
I Introduced
N Native
**Wetland Status
NotLi*ed
No Indicator
Obligate Upland
Faouhative Upland
FAC Facultotive FACW FacultativeWet OBL Obligate
HYDROLOGY
Bighorn and Gore Creeks afe the active wot€fways that flow adjacent to the property, Both
creeks are perennial streams with their hydrographs dominated by snowmelt runofr because of
this it is to be e4pected tlrat seasonsl llucturtions ofthe groundwater table occur. The conlluence
of Bighorn Creelc with Oore Creek ir near the southern property boundary. Gore Creek is
tdbutary to the Eagle River and flows to tho Colorado River. A concrete slap crossing spans Gore
Creek from the property (Figure 4).
ry. RESIJLTS:
Wetland4 wet€rs of the U.S. occurred on tbe project rite as riparian wetland habitats along tho
margins ofBighorn and Gore Creoks and as one deprossional, isoloted wetland. Two wetland
areas were idfltifiod, A and B. Wetland A (Al - A8) deffnes the wetlands within the margin
along the wert, river-right side, ofBighorn Creek and tho north, river-rigltt gidg of Gore Creek
ftOm the northeest€rn property comer, approximatoly 200 fe€t, to ths Southwestcrn property
corner (Appendix C). Wetlord B (Bl - 87) dcfircs the ieolated wetland within a grand of
ryruce. Wetland B might hwo becn creatod by ground manipulation sonrc time ago. However,
alt aspecto ofwetlard$, hydrophlic vq19rafion, hydric soilt, and indicators of wetland
hydrology, was €videnc€d and thc ar€e, 'thio wetland is considered to be ajurisdictional water of
the U.S.
4
WalwdDeltrpatlor
Parcel D Stemni& Drylexct
lVatland A can be deicribed as hiCh quality riverino wotland and Wetland B is 0n isolatcd
wetland of marginal qualtty, The approximato areas ofthe identified wetlands follow: A is 2,473
squarc foet, or O.Oe airos, mearured from the o$tablished wctland boundary to th€ approrimate
witorr edge. Howwer, approximately 1,100 square fect of the identified Wetland A is offthe
proparty. Wotland B is 298 square feot, or 0.01 actet Photographr of the site are included in
Appondix A and Field data forms are inoluded in Appendix B.
V. CONCLUSION: \
Background investigation and field inspection revealed wetlands along the riparian oorridor of
Bigbom and Gore Creeks, and in one smatl, isolated areo, There wetlande wore evidenced by
hydrophpic vog*ation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrolory. Theso are marginal to high quality
riverinc wetlands, with an odsting impact ftom tho abutm€rf for the concrete slab crossing, The
total ofthe identifiod wotland areas is approximately 0.06 aoree'
This report presonts the results of awetland inveotigation that was performed by WEC for Ranch
Creek Land Company as part of due diligence for purchase ofthe property. No rmpacts to thc
wetland areos are proposcd at this time. Shoutd any impacts to the identified wetlonds be
propored tlrough the devolopmurt of this parcel, a USACE permit for the proposed disturbance
activity wilt be necessary It is rocoilnondod tlm Ranch Crek Land Company submit this
report to the USACE for a formal jurisdictional determinotion oftho area.
VI. RET'ERENCES:
Reed, B.R. 1988. NUional List of plant Species that oocur inwotlands; Colorado. U.S. Fish
atd Wildlife Sewice. St. Potersburg, FL.
Stubbondiech J., Hatch, S.L., Butterfield, C.H. 1997, North American Range Plants, Fifth
Bdition. Tho Univorsity ofNebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska.
U.S, Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical report
Y-S%I. U.S, Anny Corpr ofEngineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vioksburg MS.
USDA NRCS 1999. The PLANTS Databas€ 0rttp:/lpfants.usda.go s). National Ptants
Data Conter, Baton Rougo,Lurisiana 70874'4490 USA' USDA" NRCS 2000.
Hydric Soils of tho United States (http://www.statlab.iastete.edu/goilillrydrig/). Iowa State
University Statistical f.abonatory.
USDA Soil Conservrtion Service. 1992. Soil Survey of Aepon-Gyprum fuea, Coloradq Parte
ofEagle, Garfield, andPitkin Counties. U.S. GovemmemPrinting Office. Waebingtotl
DC.
Wgtem Regional Climate Conter 2004. (!4ry-$ssds.Cdu). 2215 Raggio Parhn'ay
Reno, Nevada 89512.
5
WetlmdDelirpatton
Pmal D Stremtsi& Duplexes
. APPENDI}(A
Photogrophr of rtudy rite
6
Wetlond Dellneattwr
Parcel D Stremtst& Dupbxes
Figure 2. Upetroem view of ripada4 Wetland A,
FigUre 3. Downstf€tm viow of riparian, W€ttard A rt the mugin ofuplards on the propefty'
7
Weilmrdl>nteafrNl
Pwcel D Streondde hryleres
Figure 4, Vicw of exi*ing concreto slab crorsing.
8
walndtultuqttwr
Pwcvl D Swansl& Dupluns
Figure 5. Viorr of\{otlurdB.
APPENI'XB
Datn forms
9
l(etlondDelilrcation
Pmcel D Sueqrnside Drylerzs
DATAFO5UI
ROUTINE WETI.AI{D DETEFMINATION
(1987 COE Wotlerds Dellneatlon MaruaD
:l \
Cour{y:
State:
Do tlormel Clrcumetarpes g$st on thg slto?
ls lhe ella signltlcartly dlEturbod (Atyplcal SitBllon)?
ls the arod a potentlal Problem Area?
b s Commurilty lD:
Transoct lD:
Ptot lD:I
hdbsb.
aI3L..
EPtc-'fflL
otsr-.ry
Pml*ojl[i" tp""l6r thor 8re oBL, Frdi, n rrc (, o /.
-
ReodEd Ode (0€qcrlb6ln Rfiiad(s):
-* $todn, Lakq or 1|& Geugo
-
A3rhl Photog80lrs
* Othef
* ltb Hocodad Dda Ardhue
Flekl Ob6sn e{om:
.
oodhdgufroou/d8t -/ (kt:t
Oodf b F.6e lvatsrln Plt .. ' (h.l
Ddpth b geftrret{'d So,l: L W,l
Wellord t{ydrdogy hdcotfs:
Pfinory hdhab'8:
_ brtnddsd
fs*rraeo n uppeT 12 hahes
-
wrbr lvbts _ Drn une6
-
Srdmetlr o€pctt8 * Irr*ragF Peltrfirh Wetbnds
Spoodfly Hcalol! (ld moNb r6qul6d):
-Orddbd
Footchmialr h t&pcr 1? hchss
-
Wdd-gbhd t aflr6!
....? l-ooal80l sur€y Dara
/_ Ftc+hdral T6rt * olIE {Erdah lrr Rern.*s}
Rearrnr: JrEl lS ti ftft4an or4a.
Appeidh B Bbnft md E|6r||ph Deti Foma
Contlm LLpp€d fypa? Yor ts
Motth C6hro trtollo Abundance/ Todur., Conomtlonr'
l{rtxrn lldl0t![il0FtL- (fuhnra! thl$ Slzaf'ionlfa6l
lflilc Soll hdlcaton:
_ fbio6ol
-
i$lb EPhodon
-
$umd& odor
-
Aqrdc lbbfirta R 0irDt Z Raduclno Condllons
-
Clcyld or Lqefchromo Colot!
_ Co,rcrelbm
tl0h O$mlc @niant h Sirtaca t{yoJ In Sandy $ole
-
Otoanla g]tokh0 h Stndy Colb
_ LNX6d <n Lood rwh Solh Lhl
-
Lk sd on l$lboal Pttddo Sollr Lbl
-
('th.r (Eoldr h Bffitfi!)
Rffiad$;*m6a[ 5?/ //a/t /e
/oeVr, lq b cd
ltdroDlrytlc vegsdon Pro3sn(l
watend tidrclooy Pr€6onr?
l-idrb golla Pr66 ?h fils Sampltng Poht Wlthh I Wetl6nd?
(Cucle)
@*
3lgt AFrtrrGd by
Appdd0( E Bhnk and E)€mple oata Fomr B3
DATAFORII
ROUTI}IE WETI.IiiID DETERUINATK'N
(1987 COE Wetlands DelFpatlon Maruaf)
VEGETATK'N
ProJect/slte: Pruel Dl ,Yry4.DSdr uu{ryps.apfncanUAwnon t
lrus8tlgator:
Datot /dn//a/hw'84/1 _glarei Q'
Do tlormal ClrcLrnstarFes oxl8t on ths sito?
ls tho slte slgnlflcantly dlsturbed (Atyphal Sltrstlon)?
le tho ar€a a potentlal Problom Aroa?
@
Yos
Yes
ttt
Communtty lD:
TrarEect lD:
Plot lD:,z
W_Ftku
l/?.!-.Xl-
8,-
rterc.nl ot Dornlned 6@h6 thar ero O6t- FlcW or Frc O ' / .(.El'dlno FAQ.[ /
a,*"", r/E{o&/ *,# u/rao;/ /rass"s.
\'
?,_
t.
Y
_ Rscofd€d Data (Dsrcdbo ln Fomsfts):
-Str
enr. Ld(€, ot lld6 Giug!
_Aflbl Photcgrdphs
_ Othet
-
No F.Godod Drt' Ani|sdo
Fhld Oblo dhns:
OeFh of 8ur{coo Wetfi - (h,}
DaFhro Ffoowat flnFtf - {tr.}
DdBh to gehrot€d soll - (hJ
W&rd tidfdqy &rdlc8lori:
Btn0'ylrdlcators:
-
ht idrtsd
_ sai|j|ai€d h uppof 12 hafido
-
Webr i,hr||
-Ddn
Un .
-
sedlmfft odposns
* Drahago Peftenr' ln Wall6id!
Sdorday hdco|oro (2 c mom r4uleol:
_ o'(rlL€d Fool chenn€16 h tlppof le holFt
_ Waioa-tlulncd tia'r.s
-
Looal 8ol gttt sy Dalr
-
FAC-Nadtal ToEt
-otlgr
(Erphh 16 Rshafts)
Remdr.i @ *?Sft Fr;
82 App.idh B Elat* ard E|€mpb Dd| Frxm6
4 a 30ns
ilaP $l lvt'?r
(g.rhr an.l Fh!8.):Orilnaga Cl8.'i -
FbU Oborrv.llons
Tmhmry co|t'lrt litapp.d 1}Pe? Yct l&
Prafle Drrcrlolbn:
6;th-'-- fll8ktx coht fihttlE Cdord i/httb Abundancs'
,*'-tiil llorld,.r {t ulrL!fiElt- lii&stif,!&kt}- tlkElCol|'"El -
T6rduJ6, Concl.llons,
b-/ n
Hd& 8ol hdlcabrt:
-
l9lolol * FIr|Ir Ephedon _ Sundb Odof
-
Aqrdo l,bittt lo Eaof||s ' * Aoduchg CondnbnE .- Ohy6d or Lott.ohmtu Colo|!
-
Cdtcrotlont - H!fi Orlr|tlc @nbnt h sotlbos lsy€r lfl $tjdy Sors
-
Or0snh ga.dtfu 8l Ssndy sob
-
Llbd fi tood ttttttb Soab Lht
-
Lbtod on t&tlad }|yddc solls Llol
-
Othor tFqbh h Blmail!)
ru/r I ?raet/
WETLA$ID
Hltdrophytc \raqsdon Piorenft
We .nd Hdrology Pr€selt|?
lbt(f|o so[8 Pro66nl?
YB
Ye8
Y6!
Ghohl (O[clt]
k tldc Seprrplttg Potr wlthh a Wel,ard? t* @
RemdlG:
r/*
Appordk B thnk und E,€mde Osta Fo.fii6 Bg
DATAFORil
ROUTINE WETLAND DTf ERMINAT IOI{
(1987 COE Wothnds Dollnoatbn ManuaD
sgld {a/a/g/
Cr,txtty: :tl44
Stale:. @,'-
Do hlormal ClrcwfiBmeo €rdst on th€ $ite?
16 th6 slte slgnificartty dlstr^mad (Atyplcal Slt|'.ntlon)?
lg the area a potsntlsl Problem Area?
(lf needed. €,olhfn on rgvotse.)
€#Commw*ty lD:
TraB€ct lD
Pbt ID:
w
bt+rae),
qtdum tru-T7F-Lrh
a.
7.
8.
qnt0m {rdloabi
----i-<-
Po.c6rt ot Olntrrrd Spsdos that rrc O6L FrcW or FAC 50 /.(ebtudlno FAc-).
Rflm*!:
rl 't
ttt
IYIJ?
-
R*ordod Dda (D6scrlb6 h F6m6dcl:
-
9buom, La&e, orTds Oqt4s
*AotH PltohgraPhs
-o|ltor -
ib E*o|{sd Dda Arallaue
Wglhnd Fwdogy lndcrto|a:
Pftialy hdhatoF:
-
hu0datod
/ SeruraeO tn t Sper tz ncneo
Z.w.hrlihtk
-OllftU$.
-S€dm€fit
D60odb
ZJOratroOa patlonn tn I'Vsthftls
Socordsy hdcabrs (2 tr molt r€qds{t):
-
Oxttsed Soot Cfu|nole ln Lhps le holE6
-
lit dor-ebhGd Lm,r|
_ tocrl 80{ suY6y Dde
-
FAo"lhuual T€d
-
Oihef (Exphh 16 Remarks)
FloH Obloryathnr:
.
o€pth oa 6$rfsce wdof : ,- (tn,)
Oopth b Ft€e Wriar In Plt (ln)
D€pft bSatw'td sott , _ -(h.f
F€morkl:
82 Appandh E Ebnt and Examplo Dda Forms
iff#l$ffi.."r 44 -. ffi[,"tlff;;
Contfm t appod T'yF.? Yoo tb
9!-L-
/-t/q
Flydrto 8oI lndra|on:
-
ltsiorol _ t{.i6 SFhrdon
-
Sulfld6 Odor
-
&0b lr,bbtuL F.Ckn
-
tuduqhg Condtlons
-
qbyrd or Lov*Chromr Color!
-
conctatlor!
llelr Orlrnlc Contant h Suthce LeyE| h $Indy so[8
-
O$.nb gttLtho h 6andy Solh
-LM
Loorltwh SolL LEl
-
Lhld on }s|lond ?iddo &I8 LlEl
._ oh.r (E|eldr h rbnNfi8)
fu n/, /r
WETLAITIO
$d|odU/dc I'b06bdon P€rgtf?
Wot rd Hydroh0y Prsofin
lltd|b Solt8 Prodanl?
l'lo (Cl,Ele)
flo
I'b
(Cltoh)
h rHs samplng Poht Wfthln a wet{ld? A l\lo
L)
Ronrarkt:
lmt6\r€d w
App€|rdlx B Blenk snd ExamDb t ate Fdl|ne BS
DATA FOFII
FOUTIT{E WETI.A'{D DETEFUINATION
(1S87 COE Wetlands Dollnoathn ManuaD
'{\
.1
Dala:. /o
Oourty:
State;
U,o f.Iormal Clrcumstarcos srdst on th€ slt6?
ls the €lte signltlcarfly dbMbed (Alyplcal Sittgtion)?
ls tho area a potenttal Probbm Araa?
fll rneded. $olaln on ro\6r8e.)
Qp
"o c9
Comrnunity lD:
TrarFoct lDr
Plot lDi
Ps.Ea or^DsflhrJrl +€dec that rr! Odt plCWo,f,G b/,
* R*cd.d Dda (Dosorlbe In R€mad6)l * Sbesn, L,l6, or 1lde C{tg6
_lsdsl tthcilooreh6
-OllE -
llo R(corthd Ddq Areh o
Fleld Ob8tlvailom:
De6h {t 8wftoo Wqtfl / (rr.)
Doflfr b F'eA Wabr In Plt /' lht)
Dedh fo setu{elo.t so* / ,ln)
Watond l{lr*ology hdl6ibn:
Pfina.y hdlcrtors:
-
hundBtd
_ Saloratod lD l.fpper t2 hohao
-
$rrw ttibrks
* Orlt LtF
-
S6<rn o6p6lt!
* OrohagE Pat€rnsln $totladr
Seoodaty hdcaior8 (2 o. mol6 .6qulsdt:
-
Orttcdl Rootchqn€lr h tJ0por la hoho.
_wabr-stahd L€al^||
* Ldal 9oll3tr$y De
-
FIC-t{.tIrtlT6lt
.- Olher (E&hh ln Rlmarks)
Romrlkr:
82 A9ocnft B Bhn ( d|d Ersrnpb Oatd Foms
Oteirago Chas;
Fleld ob60rv8lhn8
Cor hn [faPpod TYPe?Yog ts
Pnofl6 og.crblbn:
O.plh i,latrlx Colo,Monb Oobta llotlb Abundencs, Tot{ut6' Conoo{ons'
ttnitre'r rb{|en 0&0$il"f!bf0-- (rrruolt ilrtbt) 8b&fifig{
ntdtu 8o{ hdlcator3?
_ flrbcol
-
l$lb Eplpddon
-
&rfi(b Odor * Aqulc ltobr|a ft glno
-
Roducho Condnbns _ Ohv6d or Lo+Chrona Cohrs
-
Coirololhns
- lhh Oro|trlc Contonl h srtlce Lay€J ln stndy soll.
-
Orgrnh Slr.thC h 68ndy SolE
_ Lbted on Lood tltdrh Eolb Lbl
-
llit.d on l${onrl$!ddo SoI! Lbl
-
Ofidt (Elgleli h Humd€)
fidrcphyfl c lrdgglatotl Prsidrf?
Wdard Hldrotuoy Pt6drt?
tl!,rtru 8o|8 Pr€oer ?;$ g"'*'(crob!
b lHs Ssmp&tg Pohtwthh a Wetand? "* @
Remgrks:'
bv w
App6ndlr S ahf* 6nd E 6npte Ode Foms B3
,
AP?EII{DD(C
Wetland dcllnertion map for Parccl D, Strermrlde Duplerer
18
WetlndDelircstiql
P*cel D Steqn st& Daplexes
PLAI\INING DATA SHEET
Horton Residence
Propertv Address/ Parcel #4284 Columbine Drive
Legal Description
Development Site Area Ac .5202 Sq Ft 22,659 Buildable
Planner/ Date Rachel Fiede2/22108
Project Description New Single Family Residence
Land Use Application(s) #DRB08-0011
Owner Contact Info
Primary ContacU Owner
Representative Info
Heather Barrie at KH Webb
Zonins,lSDD #Two Familv Residential
Land Use Designation
Date Routed/ DRT Meeting
Environmental Impacts/ Ilazards
Hazard Zones
Sections 12-12, 12-21, 14-6
&14-7
Snow Avalanche No
Debris Flow No
Rockfall No
Excessive Slopes No
Floodplain Yes*
Wetlands YAI Yes*
Water Course Setback
Section 12-14-7
Required 30'Bighom
50' Gore Creek
Proposed At the setback
fire Prevention
Sections l2-ll-3c & 14-10-5
Roof is not wood shake or wood shingle
Building Separation
Section 14-10-6
N/a
View Corridors N/a
Utilitv location & easement Existing **Proposed
Sldewalks/ Trails Existing Proposed
GRI'A (Gross Residential Floor Area) Square Feet
Chapter 15
Total Allowed 7495 -Existing 0 -Proposed 4651
after cred
4051
+Credits (600)
garage
Primary Allowed -Existing -Proposed +Credits
Secondary Allowed -Existing -Proposed +Credits
Total
Remaining
3444 Primary Total
Remaining
Secondary Total
Remaining
General
Zoning Disbict Standards
Setbacks (perimeter)
Front 20 Proposed 20'
Side 15 Proposed l5' at north side,
70' at south
Rear 15 Proposed 30'
Minimum Lot Lreal Width Required 15,000 Proposed 22659
Site Coverage % Allowed 20%14531 04 Proposed 14%/3153 sq ft
Buildins Height Allowed JJ Proposed 33'{'
Landscaping
Sections 14-10-8 & 14-10-9
% Required 60%/t3595 o/o Proposed 70%/ls8t9
Plant size Huge trees Proposed No newprop
Fences n/a Proposed nla
Retaining Walls
Sec. 14-6-7
Height Allowed 6'Proposed At most 4'
Driveway
Sections 14-3-l & l4-3-2
Max Curb-cuts I Proposed I
Max-Min Slope Proposed 4.9% slope
Max-Min Width Proposed 16',
Snow Storage o/o 30%t468 Proposed 47%t747
Parking
Sections 12-10 &14-5
Stalls Rcquircd A +Proposed 2 garage,2 in
drive
Loading Req.N/a Proposed
Lighting
Section 14-10-7
Allowed 22 Proposed I I that count, 22
total
Waste Management
Section 5-9
Wildlife Proofl
Resistant
Screened
Screening
Sections l4-10-9 & 14-10-10
Required Nccd screening
of utilities
Proposed **
Development Impact Fees /
Mitigation
Employee I lousing nla
Trffic Impact nla
Art In Public Places nla
Notes
Need survey to reflect latest floodplain study
Need to ensure wetlands study matches survey
How are utilities being accessed?
You cannot cut down two aspens on Parcel C without owner permission.
Need to accurately depict limits of disturbancc fencing
Provide detailed drawings of Retaining walls in easement for access
Need to provide screening of utilitics
Wildlife proof trash container
Need to verily natural grade under cupola peak- may be above 33'
W4,L fY!-A4,ni^-hottglctn &''t P'o't $ cr'M thy'L. ,
lY\otTL.ug-!-'t bo d''tt/ ,
p 'yr cft n\!r\zU Arr\n
r , vr,, l-v t - lr c v',
jr*'":" t r"'--
P \r'-'t-
Horton Residence
Conceptual Review
Desfgn Review Board 216108
Gomments glven to applicant (not reflected in conceptual plans):
1. Fire sprinkler and alarm system required
2. Snow storage will not work if trees remain next to driveway
3. Ensure path and encroachment into sewer utility easement is ok with utility
company
4. Ensure new survey shows exact location of wetlands, per the submitted wetlands
delineation report
5. Allwalls must be at least two (2) feetfrom property line
PMI PM2
MOUN] MOUNT
17/8',I
PM3 5M
MOUNT MOUN]
see pogo 122 for Pholometric doto.
12V MR-16
4'lLr,
5H0WN l ${T ftNlSH W|TH Sl8 STIM
CONSTRUCTIT)N; BoJr'. c,rp, retlcett'r, srcm. rnJ nr,'urrr nrachrned irtrur 6.161.T6,\LlJlvllNUlv'l, hoo.1 sp,Ln lronr 6L,r6l-T6
ALUIUINUIvI shert Lens cLrr ii,rm trml,creJ borosrli,:rte -:luss l'or srrperi.,r rlln:y anJ srrength Ccr:rmrc s,tket rrreJ
li[.]V llA, ?5trw $irh llig.r SE\0-l 1i|l'fi lerJs.
FlNlSHllS:Ar'.rLlableinlJsLrrIrJllrJTolCp.,ly.,tcrport,d.:rco:rt|LIrrslr
lirr m,rre inlo).
FEA'l t llllS: Frc-1.1 rtpllc*,rl.lc lerrs. Col,x filrer ran l.c specile.l rl,1 rs hclJ secrrrely I'y a rcmovrhlc stainless steel clrf rioq
Fixrure sL,pplLe.l 'r'rth 6fr. ot ll/l llndscrfe c'rble Retlcctrir roF desi,jnc,l togile m.rxintum dritnbLrtion
GENERAL: Thrs frrcure r,.lrLires n ilV rnnsf,lnrer Lo funiti,rn properly (exceft rvhcn slccrire.l wirlr mL,unLLns srrle "l'Nll" \\hLch
l<_ or0'->-l lzN-:=t
TT-T I
IF1 L Wj '(A t-l \t i \/ I -'___-t 3'
rnclLrJes:r 60W rnrcgrirl rrrnsiornrer.l20V only) Trirnslomer rnrst l,e purchaseLl sepirrately, sce rccessor ies scctlon (pge 1L!l)
,{ll l.rnrps lrstrJ ,rre llV 1r1R.l0's rrnless oLherq,rse n,rre,l. Wlren usn'rjl:r cLrlor fLlLcr wrth a 75W larlp, a.lichrolc lrlreL is
rc.rrrrcJ t,r rrrrrn UL lrsrlne (RED, OREEN, TnJ \'lEDlUM Bl.tlE) 6' srcm not recomrrrendcJ tor rrse s Lth PI\ll
moLrnt stylr (lo$rr [1ount"' 6l'], iJjustrL'lc stcrl). SN'l n],)unl slrlc m,runrs to arry flar surface, rnd lrirs a
O1.l/S",:enteL lr,,lc to accc'mmo,laLc ul ttr ]/4 I'VC tLfc irt rvirine ?5!0Linf canNOTI'curedsirh
f,Ml rnounr srylc.
MOUNTIN(; OPTIONS:
r. stRtts
Ir - J[N5oN'M
2. TAMP O- LAMP BY OTHIRs 1t- 8AB/20W/40'MR-16 14" tMW/35W/40'lvlR-16 t7. tYP/4?W/40'MR.l6 20. tXN/50W/40" lYlR- 16 24- [Y(/75Wl50'Mn-t6
3. VOTTAGE
t2v- l2 voLT
6[0llN0 t1cl] T
4. ftiltsH (0t0R
Bt{s- RtA(( 5M00TH
8I(T. BIA(K TIXTURTO
8R5, tnoNzt SMooIH
8RT. BRONZT TTXTURIO
wtis- v,lHtTt 5M001H
WHT- WHI]t TTXTURID
sts- StwtR 5t{l00Tll
tvs- rvoRY 5M00TH
cH5. (HRoMt S[1001H
N85. NAIURAL ORONZT
VtT. VERDI TIXTURID
5AT. SAND TIXTURTD
5. (0t0R fil.TrR t0- NoNt fM. MIR(URY VAPOR IR. RED
IND- RtD DI(HROIC IP. PINK IA. AMBIR
FG. GREIII
tGD- GRttt{ Dt(HR0t(
FL8. LIGHT BTUI
rm8- ttD .ut
FMBD- MID ELUt DICHROI(
6. STIM I,tNGTH s6- 6' STEM
512- 12" 5I
st8- t8" sT$il
524- 24" STIM
7. MOUNT sIYI.T
PMt. PoWIR lrlouNr" 60
PMz" PoWIR MoU r" 60
W,/ TRANSIORMTN
HOUSING Ai{D
60w TRAt{Sf0nMtR
PM3- PoWIR MoU r" 60
ADJUSIAStt 51tM
5M- SURFI(I MOU T
8. SPtCtAt
STD. STAIIDARO
MOD. MODIFITD
M00tfltD rTir{0ARD
pq t30
Itr ] \/
---i-.------r-.---.-----r----.-----r---------l---_.-.-..r.----------r----.--.--T--_-.12345678
\.isir r,rLr
WilscapcrM from Winona Liglrtinl
rr.l.'ite lor aoutf lrrr'f ((ili.ntt(,ni:
li6Lr \\'. I i'trrth Srrerr \\'in,rnrr, \l\
rr\r'lr'.$ i nonaligh I ing. corrl
;i9s7 li'll Fne: sLrtr.il,.5lrlI Fur: 5(r7'{ij.lsll J1
Spirit" Series $Mft 35VilR-8l|At0ctlt(Mufiipher:?0v,l=.47) tuMENS:300 BALI241?.IES
l8' Stem Helghl
6'
2'
0'
-2'
JensOn'" SefieS [AMP:75VMR-I6l|At0GtN(i|,luhhlierj: 20W=.29,35t,l/=.55,42l4l=.5s,50W=.2) tUMtl,ts:1,100 BAr1241B.rEs
l2'Siem Heighf lS" Sfem Height 24" Sten Heigh
t?'
I'
{'
0'
-4'
-8',
| 2' $tem Height
r.l
1
2
4
12' Siem Heighf | 8" Sfem Height
c
{7
It
21
u
6'
4
2'
0'
.2',
Tioga* Series with T.3 Top LAMp:50VllR-I6r{Ar.oGEt(Muhiplhrs20w=.42,35ul=.7t42tt=.Br)[UilEl{S! 800 BAL1oB84.IES
l?" Stern Height
'lrrr; '
Visit oui q'elsite for complete specifications: rvwv.rvinonallghtihg,com
Winscapent from Winona Lighting 3?60 W. Fourth Street Winona, MN 5598? Toll Freer 800.128.5291
3" Stem Heighl 6" Stern Height
Faxr 507,454.1814
Stone Manor Lighting > Canterbury copper garden lantems and porch lights > garden out... Page 2 of 3
.-l '-1'.:.
.. ' '': i:
{rlor .- 3w
Estate Size Lantern (16 H x 10'W - Watl Mount)
l'
'c€: 5f,iirl.00
Garden Lantern - 25' Hook - 6" Lantern
Price: 5180.00 - ShjoDinq: 514.00
1Z volt
Garden Laniern w/ Shepard's Hook
Garden Size Porch Lanterns - ADorox. 10 H x 6 Vr'
Price: 5235.00 - ShiDoine: S14.00
'| 2-volt Wa{l Mount
110-vo{t WaiI Mount
Porch Lanterns - Approx. 12 H x 7"Vr'
Price: 5410.00 - ShiDDine: 518.00
volt Canterbu
Watt Mount g
Pilasier
Watt Mount {EIEEIE
Pitaster
Estate Lanterns - Approx. 16"H x 10"W
Prjce: 5600.00 - Shjpping: 525.00
'** Custom Orders Only '""
50J, Il, rr.r;-i inJlbL!- lL't)i,.t r':c'. rcd:
volt
Watl l\f,ount 4it@iil
Pitaster
WatL Mount maftn
ZEEfiA Pilaster
http ://www. stonemanorli ghting. com/htmls/cantl anterns. htm 21812008
NORTH ELEVATION
,iiirr 't:ll
t' -_'
;:-i..
TOWLR
STUCCO
I\l al cril ls l-ist
Ilool- N4cral
Iiirscitr Nlclitl
slucco
l\Jairr l. ir irrg, Ar.ca
SlLrce tr 'l'ot'cr
Slono \/cltccr
\\/irrtlol lr.irn
\\'inrlols
Solllls
l-ookottls
( iulrlrlririls
=
4:o
=t ==
II:S ('oarings l{,,\1, 7{)ill
ll:S ('oatirt g s ItAl.700l
Color to Iniltch IJ,fvl ( l-i9S\\'
IJJ
-.
\J
c)-. r_u
da
O
E r-r.r
e,
ProJI(t tlti
0lr1l8l
0rll i t.i
Irlr! !r! $
(iancsos li(rr Atrir. ri.r*1, A,
col,r l, rnlrtch lltrl I l'il-'i0
; _,-_.. ...thllrr l.itrrcslonc \\.,sntu(l:,c iir()lrl \r'o(,(t (.ctl.rr srock *.,/ Ol-r rrrpir Sr;rii ,,itt,l Altrtrirtrrrrr('lrrtl Jcltlrlcn(.olorl,(.t03(.hlnrylr:nc
6" 'l &( j Cttl;rr ()l;, rnpic Slirirr iiTi)9 \\'rrod Sllrin lo nlrttlr rroLrrl tlint i\lr'l:rl l)outlcr coutctl lo nr:rlclt llint rr
:rlrrrrr in r,nr clb lc
rrill LrilL_j
STONE W/
SMUI]GE
GROt,| r
\,,:
__-= *
-_:z -"
lrl
TRIM/
WINDOW
COLOR
STUCCO
+&ll,'*
.;.;, ' -,i ,
'.' ii[ it5
Jl Jr
4It
--t G'
dn
TOWN OF VAIL
Depamnent of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colnrado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
w
l l8lor
ftllo*el (t'PA' 1'qqr
Frank D. McKibben
228 Bridge Strcet
Vail. CO 81657
Novcmber 20. 1998
RE: Devclopmcnt Potcntiat for Lot Xl-1, Parcet D, Bighorn Subdivision j tOl l A A LlCO';
Dear Frank:
Accolding to thc Town of Vail records, the resubdivision of Lot 20 Bighorn Subdivision was
heard before the Planning and Environmental Commission on August 22. 1978. While thc staff
memo fi'om this date could not bc located, I have included a copy of the minutes liom that
meeting. Becausc the original analysis of devclopment potential for Parcel D could not be
locatcd. I have also included a current analysis of dcvelopment potential for this parcel.
However, becausc rve do not have a current survcy on file, all analysis is apploximate. If you
have any questions. plcase do not hesitate to call me at 479-2369.
Lot 20 ParcelD, Bighom Subdivision
Zoning:
Lot Size:
Approximatc Building Envelope:
Standard
Site Coverage
l5% (if slopcs >30%) 3399 sq. ft.
20% (if slopes <30%) 453l.tt sq. ft.
GRFA: 5366 sq. ft.
Alkmahle Dwelling Units 2 units
Sincerelv./ tt.i. ' /) /) ,r'/tu//&L (( u-L_
Allison C. Ochs
Planncr I
Two-Family Rcsidcntial
22,659 sq. ft.
10.628 sq. ft.
Allowed
4a
{,2 *""""'o '^"*
lllHU$.|,.til|!
,lurt3ut..l 13.. I O7:l 9t. e
Cortlna and feels the lot ls too close to the creek.
Ed Drager then questioned whether there should be a streamside
setback.
Roger Tilkenreler felt that to answer all the questions
brought up today this matter should be tabled until the next
reguLarly scheduLed meeting. - His Motion is to tabLe
the lst Bank of Vail request for a Conditional Use Permit and
Parking Variance until the Planning & Environmental Commissi.on
meeting scheduled for September 12, L9'18. Gerry l9hite seconded
the Motion and the Commission voted unanlmously to table thls matter.
The 4th item on the agenda, I{edel Inn - Rezonlng from
Public Acsormodation to CCL has UeEn'-rri-ildiawn-S@Sffic&nt.
The Corunission requested that item number six be
discussed at this time. CaCSlaLVgi.ljI - Request for Resubdivision
of Lot ?, Block A, LionsrIffifFl-
Deane Knox and Harold Engstrom were present to speak to
the ConrnriSsion. They explained their proposal which is basically
a townhouse concept. Their proposal. ls for 2,4OO sq. ft. duplex
lots and one 3,20b sq. ft. tripfex lot. The units will be 1,400
sq. ft. GRFA and tbe density meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements
as stated by Jim Rubin. Thelr access will be from Sandstone Road
and VaiL Vlew Drive. The covenants have architectural controls'
Bon Todd. made the Motion to approve Casolar Vail ff request
for Resubdivisicfn of Lot 7, Block A, Lionsridge Filing No. I
as it is in accordance with the cluster housing coneept and
has been recommended for approval by the Department of Community
Development. Gerry White seconded the llotlon and the Commission
voted unanimous approval .
Item 5 on the agenda. was then discussed.Cooper - liots ror 20-L and 20-2 (Resub. Lot 20) Bishorn Subdiy,--r uest
vaiatEn ot 1bt line between these two lots -
.-.-.r-
The owner wants to work with this site as a whole.
These are two Residential Cluster sites, 9 units are permitted,
the ovmer is putting :on1y 7 unlts on the site.
The'commission asks for the ownerts reasoning on this request.
It was explained during discussion that it may be more feasible
to vacate the lot line making one single site so that they
will only have to have one driveway for access to the projeet.
It was nilteO that the plan is to save trees on the site by arranging
the buildings around t-he existing tiees. The Deslgn R6view Board
had approved this plan. The comrnission .feels the plan as a single
projeci is a good idea and gives the project more flexibility.
'Roger Tilkemeler made the Motion to approve the vacatLon
Pg. 7
of tbe 10t line between Lots 20-1 and 20-2 a Resubdivlsion
of Lot 20, Bighorn subdivision as requested. Ron Todd seconded
the Motion, the Commission voted 4 for approval and Gerry Whtte
voted in opposition.
Item 7 on the agenda was Avalanche Report for
Bighorn Estates. This will be set asitie for a future meeting
for Commission review.
The 8th item on the agenda was. to be confirmation of
Pam Garton as rotating Conmission member to Design Review Board.
Mrs. Garton was not Present.
The last item on the agenda was approval of Minutes
for the rreeting of August 8., 19?8. Gerry Tlhite made the Motion
to approve the Minutei of the Commission meeting of August 8, L978,
Rogei-Tilkemeier seoonded the Motion, the Commission voted
approval with Sandy Mills and Bon Todd abstaining'
Ed Drager advised the Commission that
will be interviewing and appointlng the new
Commisslon member to replace Scott Eopman.
Meeting adiourned - 5:30 P.lr't.
the Town Counci.I
Planning & Envlronmeutal
*4..__a
Eaglo County Devolopment
TO
Whom It May Concern
(Corporate Seal)
ATTEST:
Corporatlonl AI,'IE}ID}IENT TO DECLAMTION OF PRO-
TECfIVE COUE,\ANIS F'OR PARTS OF'
LOT $ITENIY, BIGHORN SUBDIVISION,
Al[D FOR BIGHORN SUBDMSTONTFISSm.
ADDITTON
COUNIY DEVSLOPI,IENT @RPORATTOX
Wm Jarnes Sianl<
appllcable, also, !o thqtollolving descnlb^ed property J,n Eagle Countyr
.,;!oiorac.o: &421l#qr-rv p<-u*a W f 1. The flve'residentlal ldbs shown 1n the resubdlvlslon of Lot 20
-,. Iof the tsigho:'n Subdlvislon, belng Lots 20-2r. 2O-3, 2F\, 2O-5 and 2V6.r I _.'' /.7\u coirenants shall not be applicable to Lois ?O-A,20-8, 2O;'C,20-D and
- l 4,v-J-. .ffi-n,r.s'on
r-n
, lrestrlctive-covenants sha1l not apply to sald resldentlal flve l-ots 2O-2
I I through 20-6. The sald nesubdlvlsion of Lot 20 of Blgho::n Subdlvlslon .- [ vras fiied with the Clerk of said Eagle County on Apr11 1, 1963, and carrles
\Receptlon ]lo. 97238.2. AtI of the Blghorn Subdlvtslon, Fl:rst AdditLon, the plat of whlch
. was flled April 1, L953, rvlth tho Clerk and Recordor. oi Eaglb Countyr0olo-
RECEPTToN N0. 97387 BECORDD: gook 175r Page 81
RECITES: EAGLE COL-IITY DE\IET,OPIENT CORPOMTfO}I' a Colorado corporati-on,fee orvner of the real propenty horelnafte:' descrlbede hereby makes and declares those limltationsr:'estrlctlons and uses as set t'orth 1n the
DECLARATIOI{ OF PROTECIM CO\rE}TANTS FOR TiIE tsIGHORN SUBDIVfSION as re-
corded in Book I74, at nage \03, etc.r of the Records of Eagle Countyr Colorado, upon and as appllcablo to said. heretnafter desc:ribed properly
as restrlctive and protectlvo covenants, through r.oference ther.eto and hereto in all deeds and contracts fon salo issued. by'sald Granton to or fon any pant of said herelnafter descrlbed p:roperty, as beneflis and ob-J.lgations running ririth such p::operty, and as blndlng upon the Grantor and,'upon aII partles clalrnlng und.er sald Grahtor and upon a}l future owners of any part of such prope::ty, so long as such restrlctlve covonants shall
temaln in force and effect as norv wrltton or as her"eafber altered:
Such origlnal covenants for the Blghorn Subdivislon are he::eby made
::ado, anci carrles Recoptlon No. 97239.
fN I/TITNESS y/IiEn3OF, EAGLE COIINTY DE'r/tr-,0PI{ENT CORPORATION, by authorliy of its tsoard. of Dlnector.se has caused this lnstrument io be execut€d by its . Presldent, attested by lis Soc:rotaqyr and lts corporate soal hsreto afi'lxed this 2.l.'rrh day of Apr11rl.963.
EAGI,E
By
-contlnusd-
Prosldont
Ffli nia?.+\! L.rt; -L.jJ,RXiIGIO]I OA
lT. Ii. lieldtbnlnk
t-''
TOWN OFVAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frcnnge Rod
VaiL Colordo 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
July t5n, t999
Lisa Aggett
Box 1218
Avon, CO 81620
Re: A Resubdivision of Lot 20, Bighorn Subdivision / 4284 Columbine Drive
"|.\t |.44 a)/'Y.'-
-r \L, \ t 4 4/\ \\-^-' '
Dear Lisa:
Enclosed please find an updated parcel map for the above-referenced property. Per our
conversation yesterday, the units at 4284 Columbine (Lot 20-l) are eligible for an addition not to
exceed 250 square feet.
Lot "D" (as referenced on the enclosed parcel map) has potential for the development ofa duplex
or single-family dwelling unit. However, significant site constraints exist on the property and
development would most likely be limited to the upland portion of the lot (northeast corner).
Applicable wetland permits from the U S. Army Corps of Engineers may be required prior to the
issuance of any development plan approvals. Additionally, there is a required 50' setback from
the mean centerline of Gore Creek. Development within this setback is prohibited.
If you would like to discuss these iszues in greater detail, please contact me at 479-2128.
Sincerely,
\W/-
Brent Wilson
Planner II
{p *nt"t"o " ru
I
llo( tAA4<6d
/77:-,t+ 29r /183
fo ?'.a 4 /4".'- .4*a "46 2-/ 4,/?--
*12 A-rp.? -J ''2'''4:.- 3.-Z T*" ,4tu@'4-
'fWr-..t& 2,.= .4".- /a-A/^/ 4-Z+- e?y iaa.u"z4/4 ,7, 4---1 / . "(z uD ", t---42, J 4-- tzz*,-/
/t^ "<h
7-/4# V ft n Zk--. g U tut ri?J
*o
I o
Ae 4'*4,*4 ffi{"-a/ 4 -vz'/
4 Z +a.-a->",4.4.2&* 7t* /.4b
le 74d-/'Y
.'e %/4 -/ '-'
^ ru o?,*.?A{,:
-.r{/iz 4 z?-tL.et>zt .Q 4-' f4t-ct7e /./
J*-
\-./7 L-*/'2*z-ezaA-.- z-- H- .z--,2h. .&r4^
tuwn n Ilill
75 Bouth lrontage road
vail,.colorado 81557
.
(303) 476-7000
August 24, 1983
olllce of communlly developmenl
Ron Cooper
8030 West 78th Way
Arvada, Colorado 80005
Dear Ron,
Re: Lot 20-1 , 20-2, Bighorn R€-sub Lot -20
I'm following up on our conversation of B/lB, and I apologize for the late
response, I've been iil lately.
For your rezoning application, I will need'the following:
l. A wirtten statement on why you feel the rezoning is iustifjed,
What condiditons have changed which warrant the existing zoning un-
sui tabl e ?
2. An improvement survey or existing site plan showing the exi.st-ing
improvements, lot lines and'any subdivision which has been approved.
This should include neighboring properties.
As discussed, the next submittal deadline is August 29 whjch will putyou
on a public hearing before Planning Commission on September 26. PJease
contact me for further assistance.
Senior Pl anner
APP: br
o
OR
REQIJEST FOR
A CHANGE IN DISTRICT BOTJNDARTES
I. This procedure is reguired for any amendment to the zoning ordinance or for a request for a digtrict boundary change At-/)- A. NAII1E OF PETITIONER I)OMALD I- I?OPEQ
ADDREss f,oeo 18 { Uky
Petition Date o
PETITION FORM F A,!4ENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
OR
PHoNE +z{-ut3
B.
<ry.vrrv e,vs
NAME OF PETITIONERIS REPRESENTATIVE
ADDPS,SS 2g
c.AUTHORTZATION
SIGNATURE
ADDREss !o3o l,'/ 78 4 AnlAoA, (tzo
D.L@ATION OF PROPOSA],
b/,
enoNz476 rb,6'lf
6to t-
nr
\t . nyl ADDRESS
WilT;EG*,D
us1.,++
' dsr.l. dC.,C.)
?^,.-, A Dot @orrno Go- Box I sqs 8oc\{
Coi"ro.ao $",.i5s, G 6oqo/
Ao-n Ao->D,arro Fn.aEs
Ce-c,ss Ro*oe R. AS'".L
/q3 E- ftka-c{ou,, Ar.
lr/^-;_0 | C,o. g,9-l-)
";i {h..- QcoPertV
/fu /2t,w
pHoNE "()'{-/t53
- /ai,6h nrc rz
EGA], DESCRIPTION LoI7O-( blocK fr-l t t 2 | ..-J,A+-^t
E' FEE $100.00 plus an anount equal to the then current first-class postage rate for each property owner to be notified hereunder.
F. A list of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the subject property, and their mailing addresses.
P^"r.-t C R"* e*g.r 80 3o uJ . -l grt^
-fl\€- be\a-*.. -i1 hrd.."d by CFe€.Es l\dq<r
_ Petition form for Amen. to Zoning Ord or Request for change in boundaries tli ^ O .tv
. A. The petition shall include a summary of the proposed revision
of the regulations, or a complete description of the proposed
changes in district boundaries and a map indicating the existing
and proposed district boundaries. Applicant must submit writtcn and,/or
graphic rnaterials stating the reasons for request.
III. Time Requirements
The Pl-anning and Environmental Commission meets on the 2nd. and 4th
Mondays of each month. A petition with the necessary accompanying material must be submitted. four weeks prior to the date of the meet-ing. Following the Planning and Environmental Commission meeting,aLl amendments to the zoning ordinance or district boundary change
must go to the Town Council for f,ina1 action.
fj
Project Application
Projoct Name:
Pro.iect Description:
Architect Address and Phone:
oo
t t-o^r. dtlT f 73
{' c' f t0 C A' C. uzt
Owner Address and Phone: <'* '-' o (e - !' ,, , ^" l
> --
1.1 ,,. X le ir '/luo,.t
(nc e. lt,,-
Lesat Description'1-o, -, () ,aro"r f #A ,riring
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board ' , /--- /,^," lf 7/ ).i
Motion by:'j,-. '' (. '- ' ul O n,
Seconded by:
DISAPPBOVAL APPROVAL
\' I v4 /lA tLw ttq ,.
Sum mary:
Zoning Administralor
Date:Date:
Chiet Building Oflicial
[;1 is Pai
PfIOJ T.CT
LE GAL DE SCR I PT I ON o-
-4
usE zorJE 'J(C--, PRoPosED usE ( s )
Lbzt4*; FROfITAGE LOT S IZE
SETBACKS:
/6
Rear
Rear
ft
e max I
Actua I . D i aoona I
J
'r r . /984:, Acl ,.ra
ft., Actua I
S ITE COVERAGE : A I lowab le
Actua I sq. ft.
USEABLE OPEN SPACE: Requi red
Ground Leve I
LANDSCAP ING:
I r ^..^t | ^ c^I r(JhrorJ t(' JY
sq. r1
RE V I El'/
Date
IT
Chairman, Des i gn Rev iew Board
Town Engineer Da te
ENV IRONI,4ENTAL IMPACT APPROVAL
l.ila y o r Date
--A'o,.,lJ,JFiT,cKL
I sr qP
f .,
ARCH I rLCT (lJfuL fr4
o-
, Sides
2-o'
i ght A I
5
mum length /op'
-,
Diagona
leng-th
_3{',
Required - Front
"4,
, Sides /O f ','._
. Actua I
D ISl ANCE BETl,i EEN
HE IGHT: Average
IES APPROVAL
I'UA X U
- Front
BU I LD INGS: Requ i red
Grade He
_J6+ d
t#ai:jl,,i,
lowed ' 3D'tu*#, Actua t 2C,>{i
c.R.F. A., 2th Ratio, Auowable sq. tt. ALE€Z.f , Actual sq
Allowable so. f t.
trrrr.#l .fuv*W,
/Required (/O fi,t+ !\^-t..^ |5V. | | . t trL I UCI I
PARKING AND LoADltlG: No. Requi ,"d /4 , No. Actua, /y' , Govereo nF
{o fi /4 *o.; covered Ac y"t J4-, /aafL r
m i n i s t ra to r
DES IGN
UTIL
q u i re d
ZON I.NG APPROVAL
APPRO VA L
: _-
J-
Zori
Date S ubm i
Da-te Submi
Date Submi
E xten s ion
ng Review
gn Review
ron me n ta I
t'l'e d
tted
tte d
o{
for
for
for
7on
Des
Env
d/7
t
_t
iew
Dea d
Dead
Da te
Date
tl
ti
ne
ne
lmpact Rev
to
date
of Ordinance No. B (Series ot 1973r,
Dead I ine
as pqrmi tted
i tem
by Sect I
COMME NT S
lr /u,-(t
AU"&-4={'da- /|'.crfu4 .-
/Qtr,.t ?. ,r./"f_fr . Ll y-1=-* : (1r#j'dlt, t
vffi,
Lof :>'o - |
./-1 't //J .-* /n u '' 444't'-/o / Lr '
Peter Patton , Planner
Town of Vail Vail, Colorado 8L657
l- f z-o
Dear Mr. Patton,
Piease be advisea that Lhe construction project of iuir. Pat
Campbell aL 4284 Columbine Drive of Vail does not follow the architectural drawing of Wheeler - Piper architects
approved by the town of Vai1. I draw to your attention specifically the asphalt shingle that Mr. Campbell substi-
tuded for the cedar shakes as designated in the blueprints.
I feel this variance lowers the esthetic value and continuity of this project. The architects designed the roof speci-fically to combine good looks with function in handling the
snow in East Vail. I feel the original plans in regard to the cedar shakes on the roof approved by the town of VaiI
should be adhered to.
Your immediate attention to this matter will be appreciated.
CC: Wheeler-Piper
910 Carr
Lakewood, CO 80215
November 12, 1980
Yours
lntcr-Mourrtrln Englnccrlng ua
October 17, l98O
Mr. Marty orFallon
Suite 2OO
1624 Market
Denver, Colorado 80202
Re: Iots 2O-1 andl 2O-2, A Resubdivision of Iot 20'
Asrended Pl.at' Bighorn Subdivision
Totln of Vail' Colorado
.
Dear llr. OrFaLLon:
The purpose of this letter is to re-enphasize points made in the
various discussions that have taken place over the past few ldeeks
between members of our staff and yourself, Mr. Gary Cooper r !tr. Don
cooper, Mr. Pat campbe l1 and Mr. George Taeckels. During these dis-
cussions rre have made a complete disclosure of all problettts which we
know to exist ttit}l the above referenced survey. we also have informed
you how the work was performedr and what we believe still should be
done.
The Arnended PIat of A Resubdivision of rot 20' as recorded in Eagle
county, (by surveyor Cecil D. Broyles) r is in error and does not close
nathematically. In addition, our field survey performed in August 1979
(with unbalanced precision of I part in 16,O0O) shor.ts that the Foint of
BegS-nning (the Northetest corner of Section 12' Tounship 5 South' Range 80
west of the 5th P.M.) is in conflict wi th the state Highway Departrent
right-of-way narkers along th€, soutb side of Highway 5 by aPproxiDately
12.4 feet in a norttffesterly direction (see eneLosed nap) - In the
subsequent recorded plat of Bighorn Subdivision Fourth Additionr which
is adjacent to A Resubdivision of Lot 20' l{r. Cecil Broyles calls for
chese right-of-way m.rrkers, and the sane tie to the Northwest corner
of Section 1? as on the Iot 20 PIat. In addition' there is a 10 foot
discrepancy in the distalce called for along the South right-of-way
line of Highray 6 on Hr?-Broyles' recoriled plat of Bigltorn Subdivision.
These problems resulted in trao surveys being issuedt by this office
which conflict with the survey nost recently perfornred. trhe original
re subd ivis ion plat done by Richards Engineering in l-9?9 (this Plat was
nc,t recorded) shows that the lo foot discrepancy is in the North line
of lpt 20-1, and was based on the information availabl,e at that time.
BOX c-100
AVON, CO 81620
949-5072: DENvER E93-1531
I42O VANCE STREET
LAKEWOOO. CO 80215
232-0158
Mr. Marty orPall-on
October 1?, 1980
Page 2
v-9171S
orrr fielil survey of septenlcer 1980 (with an unbalanced precision of
L part in I8,O00) showed that the lo feet is not in the North line of
Iot 2O-l but on the other side of Colr:mbine Drive. Thi s is based on
a pin that sas found at the intersection of the llest line of Colunbi.ne
Drive and the South right-of-way line of Highway 6 (see enclosed map).
Ihe irrprovenent locations shown on our survey of 'Streanside Duplexes" t
ll,ay 198Or are also in error since they were surveyed frcmr t.l.e sane
control.s.
During our field survey of Septenber 1980' we set pins to locate
what we befieve to be ttre rnost probably boundaries of Iots 2O-I ancl
2O-2. Pins were found in the aitjoining subctivisions (Bighorn Subdivision
Fourth Addition and Bighorn Estates) but no pins or monuments were
found in r,ots 2o-I, 2o-2, 2o-1, 2o-4, 2o-5, o! 20-6 (see enclosedl nap).
The pins found in Bighorn Fourth Ad.dition and Bighorn Estates were
within 0.1o feet of the plat location rith resPect to the rcnlIlentg
on Highway 5. Thus' these monutnents were useil to set the pins for
I-ot-s 2O-f and 2O-2. 8y this control, the l-ots are in their proper loca-
tion in relationship to Bighorn Fourth Addition and Bighorn Estates
and in relationship to Highway 6. Had the North\test corner of Section 12
referred to above been used to set the pins according to the recorded
plat of A Resubdivision of T-at- 20' Lots 2O-I tlrrough 2O-6 would shift
so as to overlap adjoining lots in some places and create a "gaPt'
between lots in other Places.
Because of aI1 the problens mentioned above and the lack of field
evidense in Iots 2O-1 through 20-6. rte rtould reconutend that at the
Ieast, Mr. Ralmond Cote (owner of I-ot 2O-3) be contacted and shovtn the
plat of Iots 2O-1 and 2o-2, and the field location of the pins for
his concurrence. Mr. cotets telephone nrglber is 476-5567-
Ftore preferabl,y, we reconnend a resuntey of aII of the Anended Plat
of A Resubdivision of Iot 2O be done and a correction Plat filed with
Eagle County. Any proration caused by tbis resurvey would involve the
line corunon to Lots 2O'2 and 2O-3, and so Mr\, Cote should certainly be
made aware of this. The other boundaries bf Lots 2(F1 ana 2O-2 l€uld not
be adjusted, as they are "fixed" by other suMivision boundaries and roads.
I trust this will fglly disclose both what has been done and our
recomnendations for $rhat still needs to be done to resolve this plat. If
you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
JMS : cjn
cc: Mr. Gary CooPer
Mr. Don Coope!
Mr. Ronald Cooper
Mr, Georqe Taeckels
Mr. Pat CamPbe l-1
ur. Jack Johnson
Mr, Jim Rubin
Mt P.-\rmarh.:l (-ote
Sincerely '
INTER-!4OTJNTAIN ENGINEERING, LTD.
\ t\ -.-'".I ':-L)-
r'
Jef rery !,1. spanel, PE ',vice Pres\dent
tl
$
fi
$
; :: '. :., t,rrs [7;J,,er5ef6. ]hiLt ftances y- $oore, Jrried and
,). lrirrl !:.:c oI !he Ciry of Xokoho,
r,f iJr'. r.rt C,, nrr-. irr rh(, Si t{,r.f Indiaia
, ,_ til, r-. rl(,tui(ln i,, ti.onnld Lce Moore, 14g Bl.ue Valle:,/ Cour!,
I Xrnhartan, Kansas 66 502
Subdilision, County of Ea.Le, State of Colorado,
and iDclLdiFA right to one (l) seaer lop liitho,-lr
charie as ir:anced bv thc tlFller \:allev Snnira!ion
- *rFi+Lri.'-.rnJ c,,i! f,,. ^r .lrqlr tjsrric! . ,/-..-_=-.=:1
|
'l.ii
\(
r. ll
i. '','i,'
--\.
:l
<i
i a"(,
\ ,i)
| )t
,<t
1'
:!
of O1e Bn.l noll1o -------_- _-_-_-__-- D,,lta,..
:lnd ,rrhr', rrlrral;lr cr,|).i;lrrlti{,n. the r.(eillt \,her.t",f is het,il,l. r,cln,,nlr,,lptrl.
{le f,,lIrr, rnc rltscr.iirrri ll.,rt Arnre in [aB]e . Coun!)..
i,, r.,, Sti,h nf Ci)1,,r.rdo .1,)-l{lt:
,--.\.ot-z6a a*t L.t t0-, .ili" """"0"a il"i;
.,.-' the Resrh(livision of lc\t 20 of Lhe 6i?horn
l
j
I
1
1
l
I
j
)
3:11i qi:t|J'rit ffi
;rL z( ; t.
r., i4l-.r - ,-
(,
l-'.1 \\
(
t,
;l ,r ,t dr"( , rr,'.!t. TIjF si{, Fr.rnc(, s :.:. }!o(rra
hir hlrrunt,' rri her lLii(t rntt srit . rxrs
lt(\l lsD
Ir"nrr h,. thf ci,!..r {nat. I i.'rr.r} t.utrl,.,n.nn ft,r rrlJ r,.uir), r|r.
J, o rk ,t., "r ,(.ie r!/<. nt,,-rt
ii r::l c r\," -^E-d .,.F,.J \. .t.)hn i: $i\od. Arri\ri1.v {r
lit {? t: l,f ,xot.{i-A.
j)
1l
.\
ri
(..q
I
il
.:,.i
,l
- Fr'J'n, s M. Hor,r., .,,t 1.ln.rt.J(,.t rAr.!n crr.n .l rtr nv.tr,nt ,nr.JD..(
'' ,) i Bi!{'i nrt lLn,t r^,1 .'lt..,rt *rl
I
,r Tnrc Tlrrol. Tho dd
bs tl!.cnto rt her hrrd
'l|
l, /-6
I S.d,
rtLil)
QUrT-CLAtn DEED
fhtt and.rlura Wrtnasratl, That Fr&caa !1. Moorc, Drrrled ard
of Iegal age of the Cltt/ of Kok@o,
of Houard Countl. in thf St:rte of Ind lana
k,.l"a' ,n',i Quit-cl"i,r to Ronald Lee Moolc, 148 Blua vallet Courr,
Uanhattan, Kangas 66502
'l ,'r RIIeY (i'[ntJ, in th. State 0f Kaasas . f r nnd in c,'nrideration
ol Ona .nd no/100 --------- ---------- tlolloa.
and other taluable consi&ration, the rrceipt $hettof is hercby rckn,'$ledged,
I I the tollolring de*cribcd 8"al f,rrap in Eagle County
in the State of colorado , to-!rit:
5llll ||fiIl||l m
jul 'al,' 7(
]'/b2-a-
-.,'- sr::r.!!1f*ali. -.::.-=- ..... ...-,-,*. -, -----;ttirrl
Rfm- Ool|fr.r:
it n F, t-na-dtsd, r ttfr4 ittrc r rt te Il c/'{rrl t
Frarca ! !1. l{oolc
ndd , tlb 20rh art d July
't
--lFrrIt-.J lA)Lc",, /11 Z'J+<ur Fl^rcls l|. xx)lE
90 *L . ro d C*r
,rarffi t .|..d- dtila{a r-r-*
Cenr, L. Hnrrrsux
ATTORNEI A'TD COUNSEI.LOB AT
Qf 't' i't-'l' '' ",i='tl tt////
h/44an \hft r'/
EI.IIIE bpg UNIYXRSITY BUILDI.,\G
91O SIX.TXET\"II SfREET
DllnrysR, coLoRADo ao20?
T-r w
la.r CoDr 8Og
ftarPaort 282-1645
0ctober 19, 197\J0-l
Tovrn of Vai I
Vai | , Colorado
30-L
Re: Zoning - Bighorn Subdivision
Gent I emen :
Reference is herein made to prior correspondence to your municipality
through a branch thereof setting forth objection of my clients to any variations from the zoning covenants existing at the iinre of acquisi-tion of the fol lo"ring described property in the Bighorn Subdivision
near Vail, Colorado, to wit:
Lots 20-1 and 2O-2 Bigliorn Sr-rbclivision,
Resubdivision of Lot 20 Amended Plat,
according to Resubdivi ded Pl at thereof ,
Eagle County
State of Col orado
At the time of the acquisition of this property, covenants there-with provided that the property was authorized for use comrnercial ly,
and my cl ients acguired the property in reliance thereon and intend to
avai I themselves of such commercial use and the re fo ie . fo rma I ly object to any attempt at re-zoning the property to restrict the use thereof in any way inconsistent with the original covenants apptying.,to said
p rope rty.
Please consider this correspondence and its predecessor as for-
mal notification of objections to any modi fication in zoning or use of
sai d premises.
TH
cLH/dh
At to rney at Law
c-s
-., >-5 <- r i{o ,,, 1t5 ov.,+'no
;o 5 0\9
=
q:
\r ---J
=
a\CL uE >G
r- tt 1I -'-l O
ntrn
o o z a {F c o {6 z
T rrl F 3 +
<E@ m :-- (-
- --t L,+n2
=^r_\o; -'
>a-t-
ftf tfl Lrt .tL l
"11 !Or-
z.<
c] TI]
\=
o-'z
z r-
l<
F t>la
l<
l=
lH
l<t>
I
lg
i m
ts
l\\\t\
t-\
T n
(-
m
c)i
z o
z lo
o {{
m o t
z
-{m
r
€
J m 4
=al
6 --t
--l
-9
TI m Itl
t-
€
o
m
l-m o
G]
ci)
-m
--t
m
^1 H=8
-
z (,c t-
=
z.
o2-.)c)0 ?9H9T;fidiia=IhiEdg
^qr9P1 6 ?vt<n
l+ lr" | | lo ln,I I I I l,ril'c 2 tD f,, @ \>ZO>mmO Q-+29R :e=P6:TEF T33 .;<nqz@g ;+i>i fiE t 662
.lsFF-1,[, fi
z m €
m
z
o
=z
t-
m !
--t
m
!
I -n
-t
c
--t
z
6)N m^z 22 lnX+4-m P no a)_n
=2o @c)o a)<2 noa.
!nAn
==c:2@---{o6 o 'nzz
€
4 x
T<
\
I
w >
3
I
s
c
I \
n
6-.
fl
s v
al
c\
i
m
N q N
--t T
o x z
m
.rl q
N
\a
\
',.1 \)k
c\
.t$
tl
N
N
'l)
s
N
h 4 c
{
S \J \
t
t-c m
€>F
+:>* <o
-o>:j:iE
iii<zfio>Q>a c-ix
=>5==zzY z->=
r60i
vj .aJn
2J;=3c-.t
I f "={ !-l>;ll;
2
z
z
--t m
z zl ol
0l <l
2
6.1
I >l --.r I ,l
I
I
Ei -r
I
I
I
ol
-ib
iN-
--l
r-
m n
=
=-n
m
m
U)
o t-m
?
!
m 1)o a I
N \J \
t1]
=2
Itl
m €
^J
m o
m
-t
z 'n
m m
m
I
z
t-
l-c
2
m l-m o
o
r
t-
z o
m
7
a\i,,t >$t\
g
z o
m
=
m
3
='n
m m
U''
VATUATION
!m F
=-.l
z o
m
I
z o
t-
3
=
m
m
--t
6
l-
ID c
t-0
z
S s
\
\
b
VI
0
T
4'
\S)
a
t\
-\
{
h\
N
\
\
\"
N
\
\
di
$t
\
\)
N
$ri \x
\s
\\.
Itr
J
0,$
\l
6
C\
Nlc t'll
t l''>clb
P
)
.-)
c..u
\
h
r,
o
o
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GMN that John l{heeler representing
Mr. Cooper has requested the vacation of the lot line between
*-L,e!E-29:l- an4-t,o]-2f3 (Besubdivision of Lot 2o) Bighorn -
S-ubdivision. The request is being made in accordance with
Article IV, Mj.nor Subdivisions, of the Town of Vail Subdivision
Regulations.
A Public Hearing will be held in accord with Article
III, Section 2 of the Subdivision Begulations of the Town of
Vail before the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission
on August 22, 1978 at 3:00 P.Iil, Said hearing will be held in
the Vail Municipal Building.
TOWN OF VAIL
DEPABTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
A.A rrW-auA-11.,U
/l
Jfrnes A. Rubin
Acting Zoning Administrator
Published in the Val1 Trail August 4, 1978
t
.PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEnEBY GMN that John lYheeler representing
ur. cooper has requested the vacation of the lot line between
Lots20_1arrdLot20-2(ResubdivisionofLot20)Bighorn
subdivision. The request is being rnade in accordance with
Article IV, Minor subdivisions, of the Town of vail subdivision
Regulations.
APublicHearingwillbeheldinaecotdwithArticle
III, Sectiou 2 of ttre Subdivision Regulations of the Town of
vail-before the town of vail Planning & Environrnental Commissi'on
onAugust22,:l.g78at3:00P.}il.Saidhearingwillbeheldin
the Vail ii{unieipal Buil-ding-
TO}'IN 03 VAIL
DEPARTIVMNT OF COIUMUNITY DEVELOPI\IENT
Acting Zoning Administrator
Published ln the Vail Trail August 4 ' lg78
Jack & Joan Carnle'
Box 533 Vatl Lot 1, Bighorn 4th
Geo. H.,Jr & HoPe G. Curfman
2O Elm St.
Denver, 8O22A
Walter Kirch
Box 1937
Vail
Alexis E. Llenchenco
250 Kearney
Denver 8O22O Unit
#hF
Unit 13 Bighor n Terrace
Lot 2, Bighorn 4th
Abe Shapiro Lot
Box 1547
Vail
Gordon & Barbara
Unit A
Box 32
Vail
23-3 Big-
horn Sub.
Rowe
14 Bighorn Terrace
v I
department of community development
August 25, 1978
John Wheel-er
Box 3129 Va{l, Co1o.8165?
Dear sir:
Please find enclosed copy bt tne Minutes of the Planning & Environmental Commission meeting of August ZZ, LgZg.
Your request for a vacation of 1ot line between Iots 2O-l and 2O-2 (Resub. Lot 20, B{1}!norn Subdivision was approved,but please be a.dvised of ttfe ten (10) day appeals period
wh.ich makes the decision of the Planning & Environmental
Commission final on September 1, 1978.
Sincerely,
Zonlng Adrninistrator
JAR/gew
lnwn
box tfll
vai!. colorado 81657
(3031 476:5613
/y##6,-*s,.)
>-
MINUTES
PLANNING &
Meetlng of
COMMISSION
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMI SS ION August 22, 1-978
MEMBESS:
o I
Ed Drager, Chairrnan
Sandy Mi1ls
Eon Todd
Eoger Tilkemeier
Gerry White
Jim Rubin
Elrppiro - Recreation
STAFF
The
Easement
first
Trade
agenda,item on the in Sunburst
Frank Dalton of Shapiro Construction Co. made,the presentation on this item. He explained to the commission that the areas involved are identical and. stated that Eld.on Beck, a Consultant for the Town of Vail has reviewed. this plan and has approved it. The area wi1l be treated as a recreational area with picnic tables etc.
Jiru Rubin advised the Commission that in ascordance wlth-the.speciar Development District they rvere required to put in this recreationar area that will be used foi Fallridge Condo and Townhouse residents.
Mr. Dalton also stated that he would like to see the bicycle path connect with this area and that they would, not be unwilling to have the area used by the public.
After further discussion Gerry White made the Motion to approve the Recreation .Easement rrade in sunburst Filing 3 .requested by shapiro and i.n accordance with the Department of community Development recommendations. The Motion was seconded ,by Ron Todd and the Comnission voted. unanimously to approve.
Number 2 on the agenda,
f Proposal - Parking Variance,- Gondola
Phil Ordway of Vail Associates, Inc. made the presentation to the commission. He brought in a model of the proposed structure,and advised the commission that it has been revieiueal by Terry Minger and'Eldon Beck and they generally agree with thb proposal .
Ed Drager advised Vail Associates on the gL,OOO assessment per parking space as.set forth by Town Council and. Mr. Ordway stated that they will comply with the stipuLations on this.
Mr. Ordway explained to the Commission that thls variance request is contingent upon the Torest Service grantlng V.A.access across Forest service land and that to date he does not hav-e the signed permit, however, the Forest Service has given a verbal ok and with some changes in drawings etc, a permii will be lssued. Mr. Qrdway is asking the Commission to give their
Associates
Minutes 'PEC August 22, L978
Pe. 2
approval subject to
Permlt until Forest
the Town of Vail withholding the Bullding
Service approval is given.
Mr. Ordway then explained that they are now seeking
approval for 6 covered parking spaces rather than the 15 sought
in the initial request. They feel there will be no impact on
the Village Core as a1l deliveries etc. will be made at the
rear of the proposed building. He explained that the parking
spaces were reduced because of changes in their drawings and
their need for more storage space and more space for mountain
operations
Sandy Mills asked whether there would be room for one
car per apartment.
Mr. Ordway stated that they may have the Association
l-ease the spaces to owners of the units as needed, they are
not yet sure of assignments for the spaces. Sandy Mills wonders
about the excess cars that may have to be absorbed by the
public parking areas in Vail and we may be behind in planning
for the extra spaces that may be needed.
Mr. Ordway then showed the site plan and floor plans
to the Commission. He atso explained that there is l-and conveyed
to the Town of Vail for a park, and that they moved their strflcture
in 20 feet and have decided that it would not be a good idea to
build underneath this piece that the Torvn of vail will use for
a park. He went on to say that with the rear access it will
be a big safety feature, as injured skiers will be brought
directly to their first aid station and then moved on to the
clinic without the ambula4ce having to come through and back
through the Core. There will be separate delivery doors for t-
the few commercial spaces that are allotted for this structure'
There will also be private entry for the condominium owners.
He explained that 4 condominiums are planned and one small managerrs
unit. They feel that a resident manager for the building will
prevent uniuthorized parking and parking abuses by tenants. They
ptan to have 10-15 minute delivery zone. They are planning
a tey controlled gatervay to the structure and possibly a telephone
wherL a detivery man, sirop owner or resident would have to identify
themselves. to gain entry
Ron Todd asked holv wide the roadway will be. Mr' Ordway
stated it will be approximately 2O feet wide, will be wider than
the standard drivewiy. Mr. Ordrvay assured the Commission that
.the leases will contiin strong language to make sure the tenants
and shop owners do not abuse the 10-15 minute delivery zone.
Jim Rubin told the Commission that staff recommends
approval and supports the concept where there will be no additional
ti"attic through -th. Co.. and major pede.strian areas with the
rear access and covered Parking.
o O
Minutes - PEC
August 22, 1978
Pg. 3
Gerry White made a Motion to approve the Parking
Variance firr the proposed Gondola I structure requested by
Vail Associates, inc., contingent on the Forest Service approval
on access through their land and according to the Department
of Community Development memorandum dated August 2L, L978
with the record showing the request for 6 covered parking spaces
rather than the t5 spaces initially requested. Ron Todd
seconded the lilotion ind the Commission voted unanimous approval .
The third item on the asenda, fg.!_@nEj!-Eif -
Request for Conditional UFP PPrmi-t- a+S -Parkj-ng Variance
ffithe bank building.
Jay Peterson' Attorney made the presentation to the
coumission. He explained there is a Joint Parking Agreement
between the lst ea-nU ot Vail and the Valt Interfaith Chapel to
use the area behind the chapel for the additional parking area
neededbythebank.Mr.PetersonfeelstheConditionalUse
Permit requested should be granted because this is the best
place for the bank and it does not impact the-area in its
iresent .focatlon. In regard to the variance from Covered Parking
he feels covered parki-ng would be inappropriate-for the bank'
it would be hard to eet in and out. causing traffic tie ups
and would be difficntt to keep clean, etc' He stated they
had been trying to work with lhe vilia corti-na on this t
expansion, Lut that they had been unwilling to cooperate with
these plans'
,. rh^ nroie.t showed the Ken Tfentworth, Architeet for the projeet sho
drawings of the proposed. addition to the Commission' He
u*pi"iil.O that t-he irCOition will take one row of existing
palting (approx. 11 spaces), which will be picked up bV !!9 joint iair<1ne "".t ttlino iire Chapel. He.stated there will
6e tan-oscaping between the proposeo aoaition and the villa Cortina
u"A-r"t."ning-of the parking proposed behind the Chapel'
fie-eipfa:-ned ttrat the alternaiive proposal worlf$ be to raise
the building and put parking in underneath and he feels this
will not work neaiiy i" well , it would' have to be a split level
and the addition woirtO have to be 5 to 6 feet higher'
sanoyMillsaskedwhetherthefewouldbeabasementand
Mr. Wentworth said no.
Chairman Drager asked whether a Setback would be needed?
It was felt there would be no setback required because
the bank owns haif itre tanO. Jim Rubin stated that he would
speak to Larry Rider for a ruling on this'
o t
Minutes-PEC
August 22, 1978 Pg. 4
Sandy MilLs suggested that the employees using the parking should park in back of the Chapel alleviating some of the movement of traffic to the back of the Chapel .It was explained that the employees have been parking on the north si<ie of the bank in the sma1l Iot because of the congestion through traffic makes between the two stop signs on this cornet.
Gerry White asked about controlling the lot.
Mike Loken a bank officer was present and explained.that they did have an employee in the lot duriug the winter season from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. and that under the proposed plan, the back 1ot behind the chapel would be used by employees of the bank so that they would not have to control this arel.
Ron ?odd asked about the percentage of land.scaping required.
Ken Tlentworth stated that they would be increasing the amount of landscaping, Ron Todd stated that he doesnrt think they can meet the 30% requirement. Jay peterson statef that he was Unsure of this and would check into it. Jim Rubin stated that they would not be taking away any landscaping so that the site though non-conforrning would not be made more non-conforming, they are not taki_ng out auy green, only asphalt and sidervalk.
Ron Todd and the other Commission members feel that there were important points'missed on this and that they should be advised by, Larry Rider, Town Attorney.
Ed Drager stated that with the change in staff from one Zoning Administrator to another, and the Commissionrs feelings that there are points which are unclear, he doesn't
want to stand on rvhat is being said at this time.
Jay Peterson asked that the Department of Community
Development memorandum be part of this record.
Terry Quinn, Attorney was present representing owners of units in the Villa Cortina.
He stated that none of the alternatives to the proposed
bank addition are agreeable to the unit owners, they don't like the idea of the parking lot in back of the Chapel and they dontt like the idea of the bank addition. They do not want their views
blocked in any way and they take the position that the Setback Variance should be requi-red, as they feel the building rvill be too close to the property line due to the one-half ownership.
t
o t
Minutes-PnC
August 22,1,978
Pg. 5
He further advised the Commission that the Deed to the
Chapel from Vail Associates, Inc. contains the phraseology
which would prohibit commercial use of any of the church property and is restrict.ed to church or religious use only.
He stated that there are 5 owners present today and they want to state their opposition to the bank additlon. He feels
the Xst Bank of Vai-1 is entitled to no more or uo less than
auy other commercial businsses in Vail and he also feels there is special privilege being granted the bank in this case.It is his feeling that the bank should convert the condomini-ums in the bank into office area it they. need the expansion.In reference to the Conditional Use Permit, he feels permission
for this addition would crowd the area and would be injurious
to the property owners of Villa Cortina. He also questions
the landscaping requirement as brought up by the Board.
Ed Drager stated that he feels they should meet the
30% landscaping requlrement.
Terry Quinn went on to say that he feels a self-imposed
hardship is not valid for granting a variance and the bank
should. consider a new site where they can have additional parking.
Jim Rubin reminded the Commission that the Town
Councll will have to make the flnaL decision on off-site and
the joint parking use, this is not part of the variance that
is requested today.
Sandy Mills commented
makes alot of sense.
that the joint use of the Parking
There was further discussion on the zoning
Chapel in Agricultural , Bank and Villa Cortina 1n
and ttre inherent problems with this.
Jay Peterson asked that the matter be tabled until the
next Comrission meeting.
The Villa Cortina owners were then asked to speak to
the Commission.
Bob'Qualls who owns unit 125 stated he had 'been driving
through this valley for 2O years, he thlnks that its beauty
is being. destroyed with all the additional parking being put
in. He doesn't wantthe Villa Cortina surrounded by paving
_ he stated. that he knorvs the condominlums in the bank are owned
by officers and employees and that they should take this space
filr banking services instead of adding to the existing building.
Henry Gerken who owns unit 220 then spoke in opposltion' He
cl,oes not wint his view obliterated and-agrees with all the statements
made by Mr. Qual1s. A woman then spoke in opposition (I couldn't hear
her name). She does not want parking close to the Villa
in the atea,
PubLic Accommodation
Minutes-PEC
August 22, 1978 pel o
Cortina and feels the lot is too close to the creek.
Ed Drager then questioned whether there should be a streamside setback.
Roger Tilkerneier felt that to ansper all the questions brought up today this matter should be tabled until the next regularly scheduled meeting. His Motion is to table the Ist Bank of Vail request for a Conditional Use permit and Parklng Variance untll the Planning & Xnvironmental Commissl.on meeting scheduled for September 12, J-978. Gerry White seconded the Motion and the Commissj-on voted unanimously to table this matter.
The 4th item on
Pub]1c Accommodati.on
the agenda, Wedel Inn -to CC1 has been withdrawu
RezoninE from
by the applicant.
The
discussed of Lot 7,
Commission requested that item at this time. Casolar Vai-l II number six be
- Request for Resubdivision
Elo_ck A,Lionsridge Filing 1.
Deane Knox and Harold Engstrom were present to speak to the CommiSsion. They explained their proposal which is basical).y a torvnhouse concept. Their proposal. is for 2,400 sq. ft. duplex lots and one 3,200 sq. ft. triplex lot. The units will be 1,400 sq. ft. GRFA and the density meets the Zoning Ordinanee requirements as stated by Jim Rubin. Their access will be from Sandstone Road
and Vail View Drive. ?he covenants have architectural controls.
Ron Todd. made the Motion to approve Casolar Vail II request for Resubdivision of Lot 7, Block A, Lionsridge Filing No. 1 as it ls in accordance with the cluster housing concept and
has been recommended for approval by the Department of Community Development. Gerry lVhite seconded the l{otion and the Commission voted unanimous approval .
tots
The owner wants to work with this site as a whole.
These are ttvo Eesidential Cluster sj.tes, 9 units a1e permitted,
the owner is putting.only 7 unj-ts on the site.
The'Commlssion asks for the owner's reasoning on this request.It was explained during discussion that it may be more feasible to vacate the lot line makirlg one single site so that they wiLl only have to have one driveway for access to the project.
It was noted that the plan is to save trees on the site by arranging
the buildings around the existing trees. The Design Review Board
had approved this p1an. The Commission .feels the plan as a single project is a good idea and gives the project more flexibility.
Roger Tilkemeier made the Iltotion to approve the vacatlon
Item 5 on the agenda was then discussed. Cooper -20-l and 20-2 (Resub. Lot 20) Bighorn Subdiv, request for vacation of 1ot line between these'two lots.
Minutes-PEC
August 22, Lg78
Pg. 7
of the lot line between Lots 20-1 and 2O-2 a Resubdivlsion
of Lot 20, Bighorn Subdivision as requested. Ron Todd seconded
the Motion, the Commission voted 4 for approval and Gerry White
voted in opposition.
Item 7 on the agenda was Avalanche Report for
Bighorn Estates. This will be set aside for a future meeting
. for Commission review.
The 8th item on the agenda was to be confirmation of
Pam Garton as rotating Commission member to Deslgn Review Board.
' Mrs. Garton was not Present.
The last item on the agenda was approval of Minutes
for the meeting of August 8, 19?8. Gerry White made the Motion
to approve the Minutes of the commission meeting of August 8, 1978.
Rogei Tilkemeier seoonded the Motion, the Commission voted
approval with Sandy Mills and Ron Todd abstaining.
Ed Drager advised the Commission that the Town Council
will be inteivlewing and appoi.nting the new Planning & Environmeatal
Commission member to replace Scott Hopman
Meeting adiourned - 5:30 P.M.