HomeMy WebLinkAboutPEC01-0045 & Hazar Analysis 2001b1t-" *-'t/t'f7
corfiltTY tEr,€roPllEllt
Planning and Environmental Gommisson
ACTIOI{ FORl'l
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail. Colorado 81657
telt 970,479.2L39 Jax: 97O-479.2452
web: www.vailgov.com
Project Name:
Proiect Description:
Participants:
Proiect Address:
Legal Description:
Parcel llumber:
Comments:
FRAZIER EXEMPTION PtaT PEC ilumber: PEC070045
RNAL APPROVAL FOR AN EXEMPTION PLAT TO ADJUST PROPERTY LINE
OWNER HUMMINGBIRD CO 07lt3l2oo7
PO BOX2077
VAIL
co 816s8
APPUCANT HUMMINGBIRD CO-JUN E FRAZIER 07 I T3 I 2OO7
PO BOX 2077
VAIL
co 816s8
3826 LUPINE DR VAIL LOCAI|ON: 3816 AND 3826 LUPINE DR
LoH 9 Blockr Subdivision: BIGHORN 2ND ADDffiON
2101-111-0101-9
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
Conditions:
KJESBO
CLEVELAND
6-0-0
ActiON: APPROVED
Date of Approvalr 0811312007
Cond:8
(P|-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond:300
PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of
approval.
Cond: CON0009214
The applicant and his successors and assigns, shall not be permitted to request any
variances subsequent to the approval of this amended final plat for Lots 8 and 9,
Bighom Subdivision 2nd Addition, on the basis that the resulting approved plat
created a physical hardship for developing these lots.
Cond: CON0009215
The applicant must execute any necessary utility easement relocation agreements,
with the applicable utility providers, prior to the recordation of this amended
final plat.
I
Planner: Bill Gibson PEC Fee Paid: $650.00
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
August 13,2007
flppr,,tzt , of uJ;t;ons
,-l ,on t A^l:e
?9 ' Dtt*
vole- 6'o - o
[.
A request for a final review of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-12,
Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for a modification
to a shared property boundary,.located at 3816 and 3826 Lupine Drive/Lots 8
and 9, Bighorn Subdivision 2no Addition, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC07-0045)
Applicant: June Frazier
Planner: Bill Gibson
SUMMARY
The applicant, June Frazier, is requesting approval of an amended final plat, pursuant to
Chapter 13-12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for
modifications to shared property boundaries, located at 3816 and 3826 Lupine
Drive/Lots I and 9, Bighorn Subdivision 2m Addition, and setting forth details in regard
thereto.
The purpose of the proposed amended final plat is to reconfigure the shared property
boundary between Lots 8 and 9. The proposed amended final plat involves expanding
Lot 9 by a length of 15.'t9 feet into Lot 8, which is a transfer of approximately 2,010 sq.
ft. of lot area. Staff is recommending approval, with conditions, of this application
subject to the findings and criteria outlined in Section Vll of this memorandum.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The applicant, June Frazier, is requesting to modify the shared property boundary
between Lots 8 and 9, Bighorn Subdivision 2no Addition, located at 3816 and 3826
Lupine Drive. The applicant currently owns both Lots I and 9. A single family residence
currently exists on Lot 9, while Lot 8 is currently undeveloped. The purpose of this
proposed amended final plat is to reconfigure the shared propefi boundary between
Lots 8 and 9 to allow for a future addition to the existing residence on Lot 9. The existing
and proposed Lots 8 and 9 conform to all development standards of the Two-Family
Primary/Secondary District.
A vicinity map depicting the subject properties (Attachment A) and the proposed
amended final plat have been aftached for reference (Attachment B).
tv.
BACKGROUND
Lots 8 and 9, Bighorn Subdivision 2nd Addition were annexed into the Town of Vail on
November 5, 1974. At the time of annexation, a single family structure existed on Lot 9.
The proposed amended final plat adjusts the shared property boundary between Lots 8
and 9. The existing Lots 8 and 9 comply with all development standards of the Two-
Family Primary/Secondary District.
In 1978, the Town of Vail adopted hazard regulations to protect residents from the
dangers of development in floodplains, avalanches, steep slopes, and geologically
sensitive areas. Both Lots 8 and 9 are located within rockfall, debris flow, and avalanche
hazard zones.
On Jufy 20, 2001 , the Vail Town Council held an executive session to discuss Lots 8, 10,
and 1i Bighorn Subdivision 2nd Addition. The Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
identified these properties as a high priority for Town acquisition. The Council chose not
to pursue acquisition or purchasing a conservation easement across the properties.
Instead the Council chose to take no action. This decision was rationalized by the fact
that the Town's existing hazard regulations and development standards strictly regulate
future development on these sites.
On August 13, 2001 , the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a final plat
to modify the proper$ boundaries between Lots 8, 9, and 10, Bighorn Subdivision 2no
Addition. This final plat approval was contingent upon the applicant obtaining approval
of a variance to allow for the creation of a lot with less than 15,000 sq.ft. of buiHabb
area. The project did not proceed further, and this 2001 approval has expired and is null
and void.
APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUiIENTS
TITLE 13: SUBDIVISION REGUI-ATIONS (in part)
13-2-2 DEFINITIONS
EXEMPTION PLAT: The platting of a portion of land or property that does not fall
within the definition of a "subdivision", as contained in this section.
13-3-4: COMMISSION REVIEW OF APPLICATION; CRITERIA AND NECESSARY
FINDINGS:
A. Before recommending approval, approval with conditions or disapproval of the
preliminary plan, the planning and environmental commission shall consider the
following criteria with respect to the proposed subdivision:
1. The extent to which the proposed subdivision is consistent with all the applicable
elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail
comprehensive plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the town;
and
2. The extent to which the proposed subdivision complies with all of the standards of
this title, aS well as, but not limited to, title 12, "Zoning Regulations", of this code, and
other pertinent regulations that the planning and environmental commission deems
applicable; and
3. The extent to which the proposed subdivision presents a harmonious, convenient,
workable relationship among land uses consistent with municipal development
objectives; and
4. The extent of the effects on the future development of the surrounding area; and
5. The extent to which the proposed subdivision is located and designed to avoid
creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or
requiraduplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog"
pattern of development; and
6. The extent to which the utility lines are sized to serve the planned ultimate
population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade undersized
lines; and
7. The extent to which the proposed subdivision provides for the growth of an orderly
viable community and serves the best interests of the community as a whole; and
8. The extent to which the proposed subdivision results in adverse or beneficial
impacts on the natural environment, including, but not limited to, water quality, air
quality, noise, vegetation, riparian corridors, hillsides and other desirable natural
features; and
g. Such other factors and criteria as the commission and/or council deem applicable
to the proposed subdivision.
B. Necessary Findings: Before recommending and/or granting an approval of an
application for a major subdivision, the planning and environmental commission shall
make the following findings with respecl to the proposed major subdivision:
1. That the subdivision is in compliance with the criteria listed in subsection A of this
section.
2. That the subdivision is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies
outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the development
objectives of the town.
3. That the subdivision is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and
appropriate for the surrounding areas.
4. That the subdivision promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of
the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in
a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established
character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality.
v.
13.12-1: PURPOSE AND INTENT:
The purpose of this chapter is to establish criteria and an appropriate review process
wherbby the planning and environmental commission may grant exemptions from the
definitioh of the term "subdivision" for properties that are determined to fall outside the
purpose, purview and intent of Chapters 3 and 4 of this title. This process is intended to
itb'w for the platting of proper$ where no additional parcels are created and
conformance with applicable provisions of this code has been demonstrated.
13-12-2: EXEMPTIONS lN PROCEDURE AND SUBMITTALS:
,,Exemption plats", as defined in section 13-2-2 of this title, shall be exempt from
reguirements related to preliminary plan procedures and submittals. Exemption plat
apilicants may be required to submit an environmental impact report if required by Title
12, Ghapter'12 of this code.
'13-'12-3: PLAT PROCEDUREAND CRITERIA FOR REVIEW:
The criteria for reviewing the plat shall be as contained in section 13-3'4 of this title.
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
North:
East:
West:
South:
Land Use
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Zoning
Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential District
Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential District
Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential District,
and Eagle County Zoning
Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential District,
vt.SITE ANALYSIS
The following is a zoning analysis of Lots I and 9, which are proposed to be amended
by this application. The purpose of this analysis is to provide a comparison of the
existing lots to the proposed lots.
Zoning:
Land Use Plan Designation:
Current Land Use:
Hazards:
Develooment Standards
Lot Area:
Square Building Area:
Setbacks (min):
Lot E. Biohorn Subdivision 2d Addltion
20 ft. front (min) nla
15 ft. side (min) nla
15 ft. rear (min) nla
Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential District
Low Density Residential
Undeveloped
High Severi$ Rockfall, High Hazard Debris Avalanche,
Possible Avalanche lnfluence Zone
Allowed Existino Proposed
15,000 sq.ft. (min) 39,864 sq.ft. 37,854 sq.ft.
80 ft.xEO ft. (min) 105 ft.x105 ft. 90 ft.x90 ft.
no change
no change
no change
Frontage:30 ft. (min)120.04 ft. 104.93 fi.
GRFA:8,921 sq.ft. (max) nla no change
Site Goverage: 7,571 sq.ft. (max) nla no change
Landscape Area: 22,7'12 sq.ft. (min) nla no change
Lot 9. Blqhorn Subdivisaon 2nd Addition
Zoning: Two-Family Primary/secondary Residential District
Land Use Plan Designation: Low Density Residential
Current Land Use: Single Family Residence
Hazards: High Severity Rockfall, High Hazard Debris Avalanche,
Possible Avalanche Influence Zone
Development Standard Allowed Existinq Proposed
Lot Area: 15,000 sq.ft. (min) 14,491 sq.ft. 17'250 sq'ft'
squareBuildingArea: 80ft.x80ft. (min) 100fi.x100ft. 115ft.x115ft.
Setbacks: 20 fi. front (min) not available no change
15 feet sides (min) not available no change
15 feet rear (min) not available no change
Frontage: 30ft. (min) 133.48 ft. 14g'25ft'
GRFA: 6,793 sq.ft. (max) not available no change
Site Coverage: 3,450 sq.ft. (max) not available no change
Landscape Area: 10,350 sq.ft. (min) not available no change
VII. APPLICATIONCRITERIA
The purpose section of Title 13, Subdivision Regulations, is intended to ensure that the
propbsed subdivision is promoting the health, safety and welfgre 9f the community. The
criteria for reviewing an'amended final plat are outlined in Section 13-3-4, Vail Town
Code. as follows:
(l) The extent to which the proposed subdivision is conslstent with all the
iiplicable elements of the adopted goals, obiectives and policies outlined
in itre Vail Gomprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development
obiectives of the town; and
Staff Response: The proposed amended final plat adjusts the shared property
boundary between Lots I and 9. The proposed amended final plat involves_
expanding Lot 9 by a length of 15.19 feet into Lot 8, which is a transfer of
approximitely 2,01b sq. ft. of lot area. The existing Lots 8 and 9, and the
proposed lots created by this amended final plat comply with all development
standards of the Two-Family Primary/Secondary District.
The Comprehensive Open Lands Plan identified Lot 8 as a high priority for
acquisition. However, on July 20,2001 , the Council chose not to pursue
acquisition or purchasing a conservation easement across the properties.
Instead the Council chose to take no action. This decision was rationalized by
the fact that the Town's existing hazard regulations and development standards
strictly regulate future development on these sites.
Staff believes the proposed amended final plat complies with the goals'
objectives, or policies of the Vail Comprehensive Plan.
(2) The extent to which the proposed subdivision complies with all of the
standards of this Title, as well as, but not limited to' Title 12, Zoning
Regulations and other pertinent regulations that the Planning and
Environmental Commission deems applicable; and
Staff Response: The proposed amended final plat adjusts the shared property
boundary between Lots I and 9. The proposed amended final plat involves
expanding Lot 9 by a length of 15.19 feet into Lot 8, which is a transfer of
approximately 2,010 sq. ft. of lot area. The existing Lots I and 9, and the
proposed lots created by this amended final plat comply with all development
standards of the Two-Family Primary/Secondary District.
(3) The extent to which the proposed subdivlsion presents a harmonlous,
convenient, workable relationship among land uses consistent with
municipal development objectives; and
Staff Response: The proposed amended final plat adjusts the shared property
boundary between Lots 8 and 9. The proposed amended final plat involves
expanding Lot 9 by a length of 15.19 feet inlo Lot 8, which is a transfer of
approximately 2,010 sq. ft. of lot area. The existing Lots 8 and 9, and the
proposed lots created by this amended final plat comply with all development
standards of the Two-Family Primary/Secondary District. Staff believes the
proposed amended final plat maintains a harmonious, convenient, workable
relationship among land uses consistent with municipal development objectives.
(4) The extent of the effects on the future development of the surrounding
area; and
Staff Response: The proposed amended final plat adjusts the shared property
boundary between Lots 8 and 9. The proposed amended final plat involves
expanding Lot 9 by a length of 15.19 feet into Lot 8, which is a transfer of
approximately 2,010 sq. ft. of lot area. The existing Lots 8 and 9, and the
proposed lots created by this amended final plat comply with all development
standards of the Two-Family Primary/Secondary District. Staff does not believe
the proposed amended final plat will significantly affect the future development of
the surrounding areas in comparison to existing conditions.
(El The extent to which the proposed subdivision is located and designed
to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of
public services, oi require duplication or premature extension of public
iacilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattetn of development and
staff Response: The proposed amended final plat adjusting the shared
property boundary between Lots I and 9 will not negatively affect the elements
identified in the above criterion, as these are existing lots'
(6) The extent to which the utility tines are 9iz9d to serve the planned
ultimate poputation of the service area to avoid future land disruption to
upgrade under-sized lines; and
staff Response: The proposed amended final plat adjusting the shared
property boundary between Lots 8 and 9 will not affect the current level of utility
service required in the vicinitY.
(7) The extent to which the proposed subdivision provides for the growth
of an orderty viable community and serves the best interests of the
communitY as a whole; and
Staff Response: Staff believes the proposed amended final plat adjusting the
shared property boundary between Lots I and 9 will continue to allow for the
orderly iroram bf the community and serves the interests of the community as it
will Uring tne Lot 9 into conformance in regard to the standards of the Two-Family
Primary/Secondary Residential District'
(g) The extent to which the proposed subdivision _results in adverse or
Leneficial impacts on the natural environment, including, but not limited to'
water quality, air quality, noise, vegetation, riparian corridors, hillsides and
other desirable natural features; and
Staff Response: Staff does not believe the proposed amended final plat
adjusting tire shared property boundary between Lots 8 and 9 will result in any
adversaimpacts to any of the items listed in the above criterion, as these are
existing lots.
(9) Such other factors and criteria as the Gommission andlor Council deem
applicable to the proposed subdivision.
VIII. STAFFRECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends that the Planning and
Environmental Commission approves, with a condition, the amended final plat, pursuant
to Chapter 13-12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for a
modification to shared property boundaries, located at 3816 and 3826 Lupine Drive/Lots
8 and 9, Bighorn Subdivision znd Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the a.mended
final plat, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass
the following motion:
,The Planning and Environmental commission approves, with conditions, the
applicant's r&uest for an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-12,
Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for modifications to
shared property boundaries, located at 3E16 and 3826 Lupine Drive/Lots 8 and 9,
Bighorn Subdivision 2nd Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto.'
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this amended
final plat, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission
approve the following conditions:
"1. The applicant must execute any neoessary utility easement relocation
agreements, with the applicable utilig providers, prior to the recordation of this
amended final plat.
2. The applicant and his successors and assigns, shall not be permitted to
reguest any variances subsequent to the approval of this amended final plat
for Lots 8 and 9, Bighorn Subdivision 2nd Addition, on the basis that the
resulting approved plat created a physical hardship for developing these lots."
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the amended
final plat, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission
makes the following findings:
'The Planning and Environmental Commission finds:
1. That the subdivision is in compliance with the criteria listed in Sub-section 13-
34A, Vail Town Code, based upon the review outlined in Section Vll of the
Staffs August '13,2OO7, memorandum to the Planning and Environmental
Commission.
2. That the subdivision is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and
policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the
development objectives of the Town, based upon the review outlined in
Section Vll of the Staffs August 13,2007, memorandum to the Planning and
Environmental Commission
3. That the subdivision is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and
appropriate for the sunounding areas, based upon the review outlined in
S'ection Vll of the Staffs August 13, 2007, memorandum to the Planning and
Environmental Commission.
4. That the subdivision promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare
of the Town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of
the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment
and its established character as a resort and residential community of the
highest quality, based upon the review outlined in Section Vll of the Staffs
August 13, 2007, memorandum to the Planning and Environmental
Commission.."
IX. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Proposed Amended Final Plat
C. Public Notice
9
€-E E g;6
c9E 5.!.-
EEF aE !
OE R
:e 3
EEE :h9 drn €!o
!Es
3F
5a g!
E;IE
99
bi 5i
;
E
E
:!
E
F
AftachmentA
I t,t
! -.:l ir 9l tl
= 5 il r I 6t :!, ti !i Ei,iiillill
ililiiiEilli;tr 3:l :i 8ii :ll L giJ;?!i lg ::$
Sitiiliiiii
iiri,ii;i
i!iEiilli
iffilffii
I
i
I
t^
ti r
il rl ri
ll
t!:
illr t?!r lll!
|!i
tii
il;!!!
ltr
lli
ll!
il:!li t ti;
;;i
i i:'I;t
i;iE
iEE
?r
i3
;l
_t
r il
Eil,
; :?i p 6i:! E:!r- :2i g irE
I
I l!E
ii ,it
I
;
E
Attachment B
ri ti
Ei
t;
:r ri
I,i :{
I
F
ir
E
t!
E
3
T:
T
T
yl
r8
"il *I
ir
:I
i;
iJ
!l
rl -'" i i tr rl !! :t..it ii!ti rie ii it6 jl rlt lit*t, Ete :! llE i6 i:
l:l :ll i ?ti i rll !
t{! i
!lli -s- i l.,i I
! i llj il I i lll lr tilliJi
riiiili
!6:
I
I
L
I?
t,
:
lq
ii
ri
t:it
tt
l!
it
st
!l g!
!!ri
li
it
tl rl
il
lE
Ir
!l
r!i.r
ilr lllt
iEr l|!
i i'i !tl iNrl
ii ii r' ji
- aa t lg
ri
l!::
ta ir
?i :l li ii
:l rl
8'
EE tl
;l
ti ffiffi
o !Ei
0t
a
ll It
_#Itst
r 4e{ lr r :!5 :i:
tii;fii
,!il!iii
lfiffitr
;t ,
!E I
:: .;i El E:il :li5 ri E9
iiuii
:iirii!
iiiiigi
!9
di:!
3
in
el r --:l lE!
il a 1
E o
F
li,,t
.irlE
,l''-'-il'.
ll '6'
'"\vl
9il"
5il
iti _[t
@?
ir !E l:
;a!l
i:l
iE I o'l 'j's'qiB,.,-- -i il \.
\ll 1i-- ,*::z ';i --'-:oI
TM .N
; Ei!3 :it I :i!E til
I ;ir
E EI!a iii.
e ittl i E;li i, !g:;i5:i:l
E; r5:;
dS:3r[
o;'aE
=t oz
L.:R.8 E Yr F
=! er - i.i
FS::IEB g
lsns: B
SF"oh \x.
3EI $
i=r {
QS=3
=FE
S isis
'1 u): o
:b-
3Ks 3*s 'aq o
e
E-
Aftachment C
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERW
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the
Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12'3-6, Vail Town
Code, on August 19, 2li!/7, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building' in
consideration of:
A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12-$
7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, for proposed text amendments to Sections 12-68-2,
t2-oe-s, 12-6c-2,12-6C-3, 12-6D-2,12-6D-3,12-134, VailTown Code, to allow a Type
ll employee housing unit as a permifted use, and to eliminate a TyRe ll employee
housing unit as a conditional use, in the Singte-Family Residential (SFR)' Two-Family
Reside-ntial (R), and Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS) districts' and
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0042)
Applicant Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson/Nina Timm . ,,0 _
A request for a final review of an amended final plat, pursuant to ClleJ:i-13.:2: iy\{ 6 Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for a modiftcatiol Jo " f iil\
shared property boundary, located at 3816 and 3826 Lupine Drive/Lots 8 and 9, Bighom 4\'
Subdivision ZdAddition, and sefting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0045)
Applicant June Frazier
Planner: Bill Gibson
A request for a final review of an exterior alteration or modification, pursuant to Section
12-7'b-7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for an exterior
renovation and the remodel of the third floor residence, located at 201 Gore Creek Drive
(Bell Tower Building)/Lot A, Block 58, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC07-0046)
Afplicant: BLllTower Partners, Ltd., represented by VAG, Inc., Architects and
Planners Planner: Scot Hunn
A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to_Section 126D-3'
Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a Type ll Employee
Housing Unit, in association with the construction of a new residence, located at 1107
and 1169 VaitVattey Drive/Lots 7 and 8, Block 6, VailMllage Filing 7, and sefting forth
detaits in regard thereto. (PEC07-0047)
Applicant Donna Giordano, represented by VAG, lnc., Architects and Planners
Planner: Bill Gibson
A request for a final review of an exterior alteration, pursuant to- Section 12-78'7,
Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the addition of bay
windows, located at 201 Gore Creek Drive (Bell Tower Building)/Lot A, Block 58' Vail
Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto' (PEC07-O048)
Applicant: - Herman Staufer, represented by VAG, Inc., Architects and Planners
Planner: Bill Gibson
Page 1
A request for a final review of a floodplain rnodification, pursuant to chapter 14-6'
or"aiiig Standards, V"irio*n Code, to ailow for improvernents toenapproximately two-
rif. b-ngth of the 6oi" V"ll"V Trail, from Sunburst Drive to Bighom Road, and a
conditional ur" p"-it, puor"ni to Section 12-8-C3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code'
to allow for the reroijtion of a paved, non-motorized bicycle path and pedestrian
*att<,ryay, located oni,3A n, VailValley-Filing 4 and unplatted properties, (a complete
legal description is avaiLUle ior inspectibn at the Town of Vail Community Development
oEp"rtr"ndl, and setting forth detaiis in regald thereto. (PEC07-0049)
npplicant: " Town of Vail' represented by Gregg Banie
Planner: Scot Hunn
The applications and infonhation about the proposals are available for public i1s99cti91
during office nours at in" iown of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South
Frontage Road. rne public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that
pi"""0"" the pubtic ;ff;S jn th9 Toyvl -of -V".,! Cbmmunity Development Department'
Flea"" call 970479-2138 for additional information'
sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification' Please
""it
gZOiZg-2356, ielephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information
,- t rPirbli"hed July 25, 2007, in the Vail Daily'
, ,r ':..t +": .:l: :
Page 2
Application for Review by the
Planning and Environmental Commission
mWtrfrilLt.jZ DepartnentorcommunityDevelopment .,. . "9 75 Sou$ Frontage Road, Vail, C.olorado 81657 ['rp.-,|-.|^1. 6?n r?o tl?o fiw' O7n d,?O ?dq? \Jtr l.tt ?t '-G'gzo+zg1rffi*iljJgl?r)4st "ZySrlO
General rnformation: l"YtlUl
All projects requiring Planning and Environmental Commission review must receive approval prior t0 submitting a
builbin; permit'apptication. Flease refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approral th€t is request€d.
nn appiication foi-Planning and Environmental Commission review cannot be accepted until all required information
is redived by the Community Development Departrnent. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town
Council and/or the Design Review Board.
Type of Application and Fee:
tr C-onditional Use Permit $650 tr Floodplain Modification $400 tr Minor ExteriorAlterauon $650 tr Major ExteriorAlteration $800 D Development Plan $1500 tr Amendment to a Development Plan $250 tr Zoning Code Amendment $1300 tr Variance $500 tr Sign Variance $200
Description of ttre Requeslz Ce lar'4e ero?.9 !i'\z
Location ofthe ProPosal: Lot:Block:-54,.j 4//;
Physical
Parcel Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-86'10 for parcel no.)
Zoning:
Name(s) of Owner(s):fe
d
,l
4+3
o o
{
"l tr
tr
tr E tr
tr
tr
n
Rezoning $1300
Major Subdivision $1500
Minor Subdivision $650
Exemption Plat $650
Minor Amendment to an SDD $1000
New Special Development District $6000
MajorAmendmentto an SDD $6000
MajorAmendmentto an SDD $1250
( n o erterior mod ifi ation s)
Owner(s) Slgnature(s):
Name of Applicanh
Mailing Address:
E-mail Address:
F tcdet^FORMS\PermitE\Planning\P EC\exem ptionJclat.doc Page 1 of 6 12-?845
aflaalalrla++fl*til'*a**lta**l**flll*tfafl*tftltl'*atall+*'il'}l*+*taa***'ta***t{r*+a+**t*a**{'a+l+
TOWNOFVAtr COITORADO Strt€meot
+ffa**fll'l*+atf+***l*a*l*t+al++alll*a*+*tatafll*al*alff*aa*ffa*a*a+ttt:!'i'.*llt*t*+lt**af*ta+a
Statement Number: R070001236 Anount: $650.00 O7/I3/2OO7O2=22 P|tt
Pal7ttlent Method: Check Init: ,tS
Notation: 76L5/,J. H.
FRAZIER
Permit No: P8C070045 T!pe: PEC -Bxelq)tLon PIat
Parcel No: 2101- 11.1- 0101- 9
Site Addregs: 3825 IITPfNE DR \,A.IL
Location: 3815 AND 3826 L,UPIIIE DR
Total FeeE: S550.00
ThLe Payment: $650.00 Total ALIJ Pnta: 5550.00 Balance: $0.00
'|r+**+++**taat*f***+flt*'t'|r**l++lf****ararf*a*llf*'}*afl**fa*+af+*al*'}l'l*aa'ta+fttat't*r**+t++ta
ACCOI.JNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Deecription Current Pmts
PV OO1OOOO31125OO PEC APPI.'ICATION FEES 550.00
Application for an Exemption Plat Review
Submittal Requircments
GENERAL INFORMATIOI{
This application is for a request to allow for the platting of propefi where no additional parcels are
created and conformance with applicable provisions of the Vail Town Code has been demonstrated.
ApplicaUon Fee: $650.00 - required when the applicaUon is submitted to the Community
Development Department.
Recording Fee: $10/mylar plus $S/page (covenants or restrictions to be filed with the plat); a
check, written out to the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder, is required to be submitted once the plat
has been approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission and prior to the recording of the
plat
Stamped, addrcssed envelopes and a list of the propefi owneni adjacent to the subject
property, including properties behind and across streets. The list of property owners shall include
the owners' name(s), corresponding mailing address, and the physical address and legal description
of the property owned by each. The applicant is responsible for correct names and mailing addresses.
This information is available from the Eagle County Assessot's office.
TiUe Report, includlng
Written approval from a cd f,m association, landlord, and joint owner, if applicable.
written statement describing the precise nature of the request, including the existing and
conditions and how the proposal will make the subdivision more compatible with other
properties in the vicinity.
X An Environmental Impact Report (as required by the Administrator)
? ' i A site specific Hazard Repoft (as required by the Administrator)b
4 . o Stamped Topographic Suruey (Four complete sets of plans).
/$ Three (3) copies of the Proposed Plat (the requirements of the final plat are indicated below):rt
X All plans'must also be submitted in 8.5" x 11" reduced format. These are required for the / - Planning and Environmental Commission members' information packets,
o AddiUonal Material: The Administrator and/or PEC may require the submission of additional plans,
drawings, specifications, samples and other materials if deemed necessary to properly evaluate the
proposal.
II. DETAILEDSUBMITTALREOUIREMENTS
Topographic survey:o Wet stamp and signature of a licensed surveyor
tr Date of survey
o North arrow and graphic bar scale
o Scale of 1"=10'or L"=20)
o Legal description and physical address
F :bdevlFORMS\Permits\Planning\PEC\exem ptionJtlaLdoc Page 3 ot 6 12-2&05
o
o
o
o
o
B
o
o
Lot size and buildable area (buildable area excludes red hazard avalanche, slopes greater than zl0ol0,
and floodplain)
Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS landmark or sewer invert. This information must be clearly
stated on the survey
Property boundaries to the nearest hundredth (.01) of a foot accuracy. Distances and bearings and a
basis of bearing must be shown. Show o<isting pins or monuments found and their relationship to
the established corner.
Show right of way and property lines; including bearings, distances and curve information.
Indicate all easements idenUfted on the suMlvlslon plat and recorded against the property as
indicated in the tiUe report. List any easement restrictions.
Spot Elevations at the edge of asphalt along the street frontage of the property at twenty-five foot
intervals (25'), and a minimum of one spot elevations on either side of the lot.
Topographic conditons at two foot contour intervals
Existing trees or groups of trees having trunks with diameters of 4" or more, as measured from a
point one foot above grade.
Rock outcroppings and other significant natural features (large boulders, intermittent streams, etc.).
All existing improvements (including foundation walls, roof overhangs, building overhangs, etc.).
Environmental Hazards (ie. rocKall, debris flow, avalanche, wetlands, floodplain, soils)
Watercourse setback, if applicable (show centerline and edge of stream or creek in addition to the
required stream or creak setback)
Show all utility meter locations, including any pedestals on site or in the right-of-way adjacent to the
site. Exact location of existing utility sources and proposed service lines from their source to the
structure. Utilities to include:
CableW Sewer Telephone Water
Size and type of dninage culvefts, swales, etc.
Adjacent roadways labeled and edge of asphalt for both sides of the roadway shown for a minimum
of 250'in either direction from property.
PRE-APPUSTION CONFERENCE
A pre-application conference with a planning staff member is strongly encouraged. No application will be
accepted unless it is omplete. It is the applicanfs responsibility to make an appointment with the staff
to determine submittal requirements.
TIME REOUIREMENTS
The Planning and Environmental @mmission meeb on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. A
complete application form and all accompanying material (as described above) must be accepted by the.
@mmunity Development Depaftment by the appropriate submittal date, which is a minimum of four (4)
weeks prior to the date of the PEC public hearlng.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
The proposed plat shall be reviewed by members of the Town's Development Review Team that Includes
representation by the Public Work, Community Development and Fire Departments. C.omments and
concerns of these departments wlll be fiorwarded to the PEC prior to the public hearing.
FINAL PI.AT REOUIREMENTS
After the Planning and Environmental Commission has approved the suMivision, the applicant must
submit two (2t mvlar cooies of the final plat to the Department of Community Development. The final
plat must contain the following information:
Gas
Electric
o
o
F :\cdevlFORMS\Permib\Planning\PEc\exem ptionlrlat.doc Page 4 of 6 12-2445
-
'TT GUAI,ANT :T, COMPAIVI
Land fitle Guarantee Company
Darc: O7-12:2M
OurOrderNumber: V50019067
hop€rty Address:
IOTS 8 AND 9, BIGHORN SIJB 2ND ADDITION AKA 3816 AND 3826 LI.'PINE DRTVE VAIL, CO
81657
Buyer/Sorrower:
JAMES A. NELSON AS TO PARCEL I
HUMMINGBIRD COMPANY, A COLORADO SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP AS TO PARCEL 2
Sdler/Owner:
JAMES A, NEISON AS TO PARCEL I
HUMMINGBIRD @MPANY, A COLOMDO SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP AS TO PARCBL 2
Need a map or directions for your upcoming closing? Check out Land Tifle's web site at www.ltgc.com
for directions to any of our 54 office locations.
1EANK YOU NOR YOUX ORDERI
ESIIMAIE OFTITLE TEES
Information Binder $783 .00
It t.ta rltta On.r.ac.. cqt ry rtll b. otott',E 6Ir zr.E rcttd, .boy. ,..t r!7I bo aollcatad rt tl.t t&.,
TOTAL 9783.00
tor co|lldl 06/0{
[AND TITTE GUABANTEE COMPAIIIV
rilv0tcE
Owner: JAMFS A. NELSON AS TO PARCEL I
HUMMINGBIRD COMPANY, A COLORADO SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP AS TO PARCEL 2
Property Address: LOTS 8 AND 9, BIGHORN SIJB 2ND ADDITION AKA 3816 AND 3826 LUPINE
vArL. co 81657
Your Reference No. :
When referring to this order, please reference our Order No. V50019067
- CEARGES.
Information Binder $183.00
-Total-$r83.00
Please make checks payable to:
Land Title Guarantee C-ompany
P.O. Box 5440
Denver. CO 80217
(hicago Title Insurance Company
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule A
Our Order No. V50019067
Cust. Rd-:
hoperty Adclress:
LOTS 8 AND 9. BIGHORN SUB 2ND ADDITION AKA 3816 AND 3826 LUPINE DRIVE VAIL, CO
81657
I- Effective Date: April 20, 2007 at 5:00 P.M.
2. Policy to be Issued, and hoposed Insured:
Information Binder
Proposed Insured:
JAMES A. NEIJON AS TO PARCEL I
HUMMINGBIRD COMPANY, A COLORADO SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP AS TO PARCEL 2
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commifinmt and covered herein is:
A Fee Simple
4. Titte to the estate or interest coyered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in:
JAMES A. NEISON AS TO PARCEL I
HUMMINCBIRD COMPANY. A COLORADO SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP AS TO PARCEL 2
5. The land referred to in this Commitmmt is described as follows:
PARCEL I:
LOT 8, BIGHORN SUBDTVISION, SECOND ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT
THEREOF, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATEOF COLORADO.
PARCEL 2:
LOT 9, BIGHORN SUBDIVI$ON, SECOND ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT
THEREOF, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COIORADO.
ALTA COMMITMENT
ScheduleB-Sectionl
(Requirements) Our Order No. V50019067
The following are the requirernents to be complied with:
Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or
interest to be insured.
Item O) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured mrst be executed and duly filed for record,
to-wit:
Item (c) Payment of all taxes, charges or assessments levied and assessed against the subject premises which are due
and payable.
Item (Q Additional requiremcnts, if aay disclosed below:
This product is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any form of title guarantee nor insurance. The
liability of the compatry chall aq1 exceed the charge paid by thc applicanr for this p1edlg1, nor shall the conpany be
held liable to atry party other rhnn the ap'plicant for this product.
THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED
PIJRSUANT HERETO.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B - Section 2
(Exceptions) OurorderNo. V50019067
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unlcs the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
l. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not show[ by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in bormdary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and
inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter firnished, imposed by law and
not shownby the public records.
5. Defects, liens, ercumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or
attaphing subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the Foposed insured acquires of record for
.value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this C-ommitment.
6. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records.o the Treasurer's offrce.
7. Liens for unpaid water znd sewer charges, if any..
8. In addition, the owner's policy will be subject to the mortgage, if any, noted in Section I of Schedule B hereof.
g. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR IODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE
THEREFROM SHOULD TTIE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES
AS RESERVED IN UMTED STATES PATENT RE@RDED APRIL 28, I9OO, IN BOOK 48 AT
PAGE477.
IO. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE
IJNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UMTED STATES PATENT RECORDED APRIL 28, I9OO,
IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 477.
II. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITTJRE OR RE'VERTER CLAUSE,
BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED TJPON RACE,
coloR, RELIGION, SHL SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMIUAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS,
DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF IN@ME' AS
SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT
SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE I.AW AS CONTAINED
IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 20, 1962, IN BOOK I74 AT PAGE 403 AND AS
AMENDED IN INSTRIJMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 19,I963,IN BOOK I75 AT PAGE
257.
12. A TEN PERCENT NON-PARTICIPATING ROYALTY IN AND TO THE PROCEEDS DERIVED FROM
THE SALE OF MINERALS, ETC., PRODUCED AND MINED FROM SAID PREMISES, ALL AS
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B - Section 2
@xceptions) Our Order No. V50019067
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
SET FORTH AND RESERVED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN BOOK 166 AT PAGE 407.
13. EASEMENTS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES
AS SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THE RECORDED PLAT OF BIGHORN SUBDIVISION, SECOND
ADDITION.
(THE ITEM LISTED BELOW AFFECTS PARCEL I)
14. TERMS. CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF NOTICE OF ENCUMBRANCE AND RESOLUTION
RECORDED APRIL 30. 2OOI AT RECEPTION NO. 755757.
(THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW AFFECT PARCEL 2)
15. DEED OF TRUST DATED DECEMBER 05, 2003, FROM ruNE FRAZER TO THE PUBLIC
TRUSTEE OF EAGLB COTJNTY FOR THE USE OF MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC. AS NOMINEE FOR FIRST WESTERN MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. TO
SECT'RE TIIE SUM OF $I5O,OOO.OO RECORDED DECEMBER 1I,2ffi3, UNDER RECEPTION
NO.861542.
16. DEED OF TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 06, 2006, FROM HUMMINGBIRD COMPANY, A COLORADO
SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE @I'NTY FOR THE USE OF
WESTSTAR BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $2OO,OOO.OO RECOFDED NOVEMBER 29, 2006,
UNDER RECEPTION NO. 20M32579.
17. JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CEDYCO CORPORATION AGAINST JI'NE FRAZIER AND
HUMMINGBIRD COMPANY IN THEAMOUNT OF $8,964.89 PLUS COURT @STS ENTERED ON
DECEMBER22,2OO5, TRANSCRIPT OFWHICH WAS RECORDED FEBRUARY 07,2W6,
UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200603233, CIVILACTION NO. O5CV-0724, DISTRICT COURT
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF EAGLE.
LAND TITLE GUARANITE COMPANV and LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY. GRAND JI,JNCTION
DISCLOST]RE STAITMENTS
Note: Pu$ua to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that:
A) The subject real property nay be located in a special taxing district'
B) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained ftom the County
Treasurer's authorized agent.
C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from
the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the C-ounty Assessor.
Note: Effective September l,1997, CRS 30-10406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing
in the clerk and recorder's sffigs shall contain a top rnargin ofat least one inch and a left, rigbt and bottom
margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that
does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin slrall not apply to doclments using forms
on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document.
Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article YII requires tbat "Every
title entity shall gg responsible for all matte$ which appear of record prior to the time of recording
whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal
documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that land Title Guarantee
Company conducts the closing of the insured uansaction and is responsible for recording the
legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title
Policy and the knders Policy when issued.
Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typicdly by deletion
of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be
issued) upon coqliance with the following conditions:
A) The land described ia Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which
includes a condominium or tovmhouse unit.
B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-mcn for purposes of
corstruction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months,
C) The Coryany must receiye an appropriate affidavit hdennifying the Company against un-filed
mechanic's and material-men's liens.
D) The C-ompany mrst receive payment of the appropriate premium.
E) If there has been construction, iqnovements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased
wirhin six months prior to the Date of the Cimmifinent, the requiremeils to obtain coverage
for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information
as to the seller, the builder and or the contraclor; payment of &e ap'propriate premium fully
executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the corrpany, and, any additional requirements
as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company-
No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured
has contracted for or agreed to pay.
Note: Pursurt to CRS l0-ll-123, notice is hereby given:
This notice applies to owner's policy eommitments containing a mineral severance instrument
excqrtion, or exceptiors, in Schedule B, Section 2.
A) That therc is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise
conveyed from the surface estate and tbat thcre is a substanrial likelihood that a third party
holds some or dl interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and
B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the
surface owner's permission.
Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the coryany to provide any of the coverages
referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied.
Form DISCIOSURE 0910110?
NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY
tr'idelity National Flnancial Group of Companies / Chicago Title Insurance Company
Security Union Title Inzurance Company
July l,2001
We recosnize and resoect the privacv exDectations of today's consumers and the requirements of applicable federal and
state oriiacv laws. We believd that iukins vou awiue Offow we use vour non-Dublic perso"rl information ("Personal
Iufor;natiori). atrd to whom it is discloseil -will form the basis for a rblationshiir of trrist between us and the public
that we serve.'This Privacy Statement provides that explanetion. We resewe thd right to change this Privacy -
Statement from time to time consistent with ap'plicable privacy laws.
In the course of our business, we rnay collect Personal Information about you from tbe following sources:
From aoplications or other forms we receive from vou or vour authorized reDresentative;
lrom ybur transactioTs with, or from the services 6eing pErformed by, us, o-ur affiliates, or others;
rrom our tnrcrnet weD srtes:
From the public records maintained by governnental entities that we either obtain directly from those
entities, oi' from our affiliates or otheisiand
From consumer or other reporting agencics.
Our Policies Regarding the Protection of the Confidentiality and Security of Your Personal Information
Ws meiataia p6vsical. electronic and procedural safesuards to Drotect vour Personal Information from unauthorized
access or intrirsibn. We limit access td the Personel liformation onty til those employees who need such access in
connection with providing products or services to you or for other l-egitimate busineSs puposes.
Our Policies and hactices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information
We may share your psl5snal Irformation with our affiliates, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real
estate s'ettlemerit service providers. We also may disclose your Personal Informatiori:
* to aqents. brokers or rcDresentatives to Drovide vou with services vou have requested;* qo tffi5d-party contractois or.service providers wlo provide servictis or perforni marketing or other
tuncuoDs on our benafii an(r * to others with whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe you
may find of interest.
In addition we will disclose vour Person4l Information when vou direct or qive us permission, when we are required
bv law to do so. or when we 3usoect fraudulenl or criminal aciivities. We alio may -disclose youl Personel
Liformation whLn otherwise perfoitted by applicable privacy laws such as,.for exahple, wheh disclosure is needed
to enforce our righs arising out of any agricment, transaction or relationship with you.
One of the important responsibilities of somc of our affiliated companies is to record documents in the public
d6meia. Such documenti mry conuin your Personal Information. -
Right to Acces Your Personal Information and Ability to Correct Errors Or Request Changes Or Deletion
Certain scates afford vou the risht to access vour Personal Information and, under certain circumstances, to find out
to whom vour Persoial Informltion has beeir disclosed. Also. certain states afford you the risht to request
correctiod, amendment or deletion of your Personel Information. We reserve the riEht, where permittid by law, to
cbarge a reasonable fee to cover the c<ists incurred in responrling to such requests.
All requests submitted to the Fidelity National Financial Group of C.ompanies/Glicago Title Insurance Company
shall bi in writing, and delivered to'the following address:
Privacy Compliance Offi cer
Fideliiv National Financial, Inc.
4050 Calle Real. Suite 220
Santa Barbara. CA 931 l0
Multiple hoducts or Services
If we provide yop qlth more than one fimncial. product or service, you rnay receive more than one privacy notice
rrom us. we aporoglze ror any rnconve ence urrs guy cause you.
Form PRIV. POL - CH I
NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY OF
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION
AND
MERIDIAN I^AND TITLE, L.L.C., A COLORADO LIMITED LIABLITY COMPANY, D/B/A
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY - GRAND ruNCTION
this StatemenJ is provided to you as a cuslomer of llnd Title Guarantee Coryany, a Colorado corporation and
Meridian l-and Title, LLC, d/b/a tand Title Guaraatee Company - Grand Junction.
We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal
and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your
trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We meinlain and regularly review internal and external
safegrrards against unauthorized access to non-public personal information ("Personal Information").
In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from:
* applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our
web_based tsatrsactiotr menagement System;* your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates, or others;
* a consumer rqrorting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction;
and
+ the public records mrintained by govemmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities,
or from our affrliates and non-affiliates.
Our policies regarding the protection of the confdentiality and security of your Personal Information are as
follows:* We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that
information in order to provide products ad services to you.
* We mrintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to
protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion.* Eryloyees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary
action.* We regularly access security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal
Information.
ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT PERMITTED BY I-AW.
Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be
disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permissioq when we are
required by law to do so, for exaryle, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect frauduleil or
criminal activities. We atso may disclose your Pcrsonal Information when otherwise permitted by aprplicable
privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our dghts arising out of any agreement,
traosaction or relslisnship with you.
Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows. Any controveny or claim arising out of or relating to our
privacy poticy, or the breach thereol shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American
erbitration Association, and judgme rryon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may bc entered in any court
having judsdiction thereof .
Forn PR I V. POL. LTG.I
ffinrrn h,a
{"ft Et 7
PEAK IAND CONSULTANTS, INC.
PEAK LAND SURVEYING. INC,
PEAK CIVIL ENGINEEBING, INC.
97}47ffi644. FAX 970476€616 . 1@ LIONE FIOGE LmP ' VAIL' cO S1657
Letter of Transmittal:
To:
Out",
lob#: /O/9
Mailed Delivered Overnight Mail Two Day Mail Fax Pick-up Modem Other
We are sending the
following items:
Reproductions
Specifications
Copy of Letter
Change Order
Samfles
Disks
Other
Copies Description Date
These are
transmitted:
..4f@-D
As Requested
Reviewed
For Your Use
For Review &
Comment
For Your Record
Other
U A*-(d /tr7ur/ L-
srzr'oF/ /* n6 +hru,a_ '
ff
Remarks:
This form serves to verifo that the proposed improvements will not hpact any €xiding.or. poposed utility- selices' and also to
;;il;;il ";iriUirirv
anJio"uton ior ner construction anrl should be used ln aoniunction with preparing your utilify plan and
,.r,.|u1ng instaltafons- e site plan, inctuding grading plan,ioor plan, and elerrathns, shall be submitted to the following utilities
il;;;;;;.i;"J uurtRcauon. p[erGr nu.ow uP T6'2 wEEKs FoR APPRoVAI oR coMMEl{Ts FRoM rHE uTlurY
COHPANIES. If you are un.Ofe to oUtuin comments within that Umeframe please contact The'Town of Vail.
,Ju t .23, 20rll 2:18Ptrl pealt land ccnsrt lti0ts ' inc
Sm unt-rrY APPRovAL & vERrFrcATroN
r0n0f viltz
llo.{569 P.2
suaoivtston:FlAlbil-A SdjvD tot*, I * 7
Commgnts Date
ftr*%tifast
^{s
o7ercCI- tjyudt
Deyeloper to ProYide Lot Addregs Informadon:
Lot Addr€ss:
QWESr
Aitho rited Slonaturc
970.468.6860(tel)
970.a68.0672(fax)
Contacts: Sarn Tooley
samuel. loolev(dcwest.com
XCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS
970.26?,4a76 (tel)
970.468.1401 (fax)
'c.onbct: Rich Sisneros
richard.sisneros@xcelenerov,com
HOLY CROSS ENERGY
970.947.sa2s (tel)
970.945.4081 (fax)
Conbct: Diana Golis
dgolis@Iolvcrqss.com
XCEL Energy
970.262.4038 (fax)
970.262..t024 (cel)
Con(a(ts:
Kit Bogert
Kathwn. Boqert@XCELENERGY. com
EAGLE R.NER WATER &
SANTTATION DISTRICT
970.476.7480 (tel)
970.476.408 (fa\\
Contact Fred Haslee
fhadqg@erwsd.orq
COI{CAST CABLE
970,418.8248 (td)
970.949.9138 (fax)
Conbct: David Evans
david evans@cable,comcast.com
NOTES!
L II the utility approval & verifiation form has signatures from each of tlre uutity companies, and no comments are made dlrectly
on the iorm, or no action is taken within 2 weeks of the Ublityl receipt of the form without explanauon the Town wlll presume
that th€re are no problems and the dwelopment can proceed'
i.-rt a ,nrity company has concems wtttr the proposed construcion, tfre uUllty represenbtlve shall note directly on the utility
u.,irrqti* rirrr ttrit tirere ls a problem which need! to be rsolved. The issue sbould then be detailed in an attached letter to the
Town of Vail. Howwer, praat. f".p in mind that it is the responsibility of the utility.conpany and the applicant to resolve
identlfied problems.
3. These verifications do not relieve the contractor of the responsibiltty to obtain a Public Way Permit hom tie Depa(ment of
pubticWorks at the Town of Vall. uuiity testions must be obhined before digoino in any public rightol-way or'easement
*iu,,in u* ro*n or vait. I buiiliffirmit ana mu+ h. obtained seoatately' . -.
a'n.oeva|ope,i.,"quh@visecanwlng5totheUtj|itlesforre.approva|&re-verlficalionifthe
submitted plans are altered in arry iay aner thg 3uthsrized signature date (unless othemise speclflcally noted within the comment
area of this form).
Develope/s Signature
F:\cdev\FORMS\PermitsPlanning\DRB\Ulility Approval-0S I m7.doc
z c 4esooooos.e 'oN/e ! : o I 'lsle! 'o'- Looz zz -.|frl- ( ltll>
Date
5-16-2007
zLao€,g'loLe 3Nl.t'H'l'll|3/\_'t ls lsSmo $lolll
SILVERTH0RNE HP Faxr19704681401 Jut 24'2UU( /:51 r.u2
^t,V,-il[i
t;jg[U peaklandconsullanls,inc No.{5i0 P 2/3
UIIUTY APPROVAL & VERIFICATION
lNxCY lLt,
This form servcs to vaify that the prpos€d impro\rements will not impact aoy exlsting ot progosed utility setylces, and also to
verity s€rvice availaHlity and locAtion for new construction and should be uted in conjunction with preparing your utllity plan and
srhedulino anstalhtions- A elt! plrn, lrr|rxling grading plan. noor plan, and €lcvcuons, sh6ll be subrnitted to the follotrving uttlitFt
for approval and wrifiotion, PIIASE ALLOW uP To 2 WEEKS FoR APPnOV I OR, COllHEilTs FRoH rHE UITUTV
COilPAl{lEs. If you are unable to obtaln comments within that timeframe please cont ct The Tovm of Vatl.
Daveloper Io Pmvidc Lot Addrcs Infonnttion:
subdtvFltot.Fl,lbLA fu'rfD U,r#,-Q tLL
Authorized !Iqnatur.Comrflent5 Dttc
Lot Addrcss:
QWEST
970.468.6860(tel)
970.468.O672(fax)
Contacts: Sam Tooley
samuel.toolev@owest.com
XCTL HIGH PRESSURE GAS
970.252.4076 (tel)
970.468.r{01 (fax)
Contact: Rkh Sisneros
richard. sisneros@xcelcneray.com
TIOLY CROSS EI{ERGY
e70.947.5425 (tcl)
970.9{5.4081 (fax)
Contact: Diana Golis
doolis@holvgosi.com
XCEL Energy
970.262.4038 (fax)
970.262.a024 (tel)
Contacts:
Kit Bogert
K.thrvn.Eooert@XCELFNERGY.coTI
EAGLE RIVTR WAYER T
SAIIITATIOII DISTNICT
970.{76.7{80 (tel)
970.476.4089 (fax)
Contad: Fred Haslee
Fhaslee@erwsd.oro
COMCASTCABLE
970.ar8.82,18 (rel)
970.9a9.9138 (fax)
bntact: David Evans
Covrd evans@cable comcast,com
IOTEST
I ut- e1#' . ('1-t' 6N'/(o 'JUL 2 3 2007
l. If the utility approval & verlncatton form har signatures trom eadr of the utility companies. and no comments are made dire$ly
rn the form, or no actlon is taken within 2 wecks of the Uttliv's receipt of the form without explanation the Town will presume
hat there are no pmblems and the development can proceed.
I ll a fiility company has concems with the prqosed construction, th€ utlllty represcntative shall note directly on the utility
crilicadon form that there is a problem whkh ne€ds to ba resolved. The hsue should then bc detailed in an anached lettet to the
bwn of Varl. Horvever, glcasa keep in mind that it is ths nesponsitility' of the utilrty.company and the applicant to resolvc
dcnufr€d prott€rns.
l. These verificatiofls do not relieve th€ contr.ctor ol the responsibility to obtrin a Public way Permlt from the Department of
tublic Works at the Town ol Vail. Utility locataonr must b6 obhined bcforl diooina in any public light of-way or easement
vithtn the Town of Vail. A buildlno pcr|nit ls not . Publla Wru lcftrit rnd musr bc obhirred sGprr.blv-
1. The Developer is requircd and agrees to subnlt any rorised drtwings to the utilities for re-rpproval &. re-venficatlon rf th€
ubmitted plans are altered In arry way aftcr the authorized srgnature date (unlcss otheMis€ specjncally noted within thc comrncnt
rrea of tiis form).
)eveloper's Signrture
' :\cdsv\FORMSUemrstPhnning\DR8\UIiliv ApD(oy.t_O5- l6O7-doc
Dare
5-t6.?OO7
' ./{u5. 1' 2001 l0:50Atr| peak lano consullan(lrlnc
KrDl urrlsITYAPPRovAL&vERrFIcATroN
il;t;ff*** to verifo that dre prop*dimpro,€mants vriil nor impact any cxisting or proposed utitity sey"ice5, and arso to
verify service aVailability ana ro--U[n-for rrew.bn*,rqton.il;h;iil-#;; in coniunctiqn wlth prexring your utility Plan and
schedutins insralations. n o*i'I.",'in.ifi;g g'd_4!g 4"oiri- ili11;1i-91e"U"ni +a1 ue s'omt*€d to the followlne utilities
for approval and v€t1ft@tion. #;l3t'Aii6i^r-irCio t W*is-Fon lppnolau oR. cor4ilENT5 FR9M THE UIIL'TY
coHpANIES. Iryouareuna'ffi6;G;;"il;*itr'in[attimerramePleaseconta€tTheTownofvail'
Pevetoper to Provftte LotAddrgs Inlormflont
Lot Addres+
Asthodted slqnalure Comments
4wes'r
970J68-6860(tel)
970-4€8.062(fax)
Contads: Sarn Tooley
sarnudloqley.@s4estlalo
rfcu xten PRESSURE cAs
'szo.zezeozo lteq
970.458-1au (fax)
'conbd!! Rlch Slsneros
richard,sisn€ros@xcelenerqY-com
HOLYCROSSENERGY
970.947.s425 (tel)
970.94s-4081 (Ex)
Cootact: Diana Golis
gdis@hal@ss.cal[
V(CIL Energry
970.262-1038 (fax)
970.262.4024 (tel)
SANTTATION DISTRICT
970.476-7480 (tet)
970.476.4089 (rax)
Conract Fred Haslee
fhaslee@er!4Eg-orq
COMCA5TCABII
e7o.41B,sz48 (tel)
970-949.913E (fax)
Contzctr David Evans
david qra nt@.qblqornqjt' cqUl
8'7-D7
NOTES:
L lf the utility apprcval u vedFtcation form has sgnaures from eaclr of fie utfiv comPa'nies' and no comments are made direclY
on dre form, 6,1 1e acdon F;E;;tirf i *lur6 or u" urt-liv. *Gpl'"r rc'norm unrmut exPlanation the Town wlll presume
l"tt"'frt;H;E'Jffi$:;1*':fi|L:'fi#1ff;*,..io' th9,irry-fl,=:n'dve sha note cttredrv el tre uilltY
verificarion torm thar there r'" ii"dr"r" n nia, nl"ai t" u" ifri".olih" Est'e tiou'l tten be deaited in an atbched letter to the
Town of Vait. However. pease reep In mind that n f il?[lpi#ii-ifit' ti iiJtn1V company and the applicant Do resolve
identified groblems.
!-. ftt.* u"rn-dons do no! rel[9y9 !!e of tre responsibllitv to obtain a Publrc Way ferm$.fro.11 ltr-e.Depadnent
of
' -i..t iJ"iulnea before drggins in iny public right{f-way or easemmt
iuUuc wotrs at tt e Tot'n of vaiL llli
w'rthln dreTown of Vail.if zhe withln dte Town gf vatl. a iurtotnq P"$"J!%[bes for r+.appfoval.&
i. rii" o*.rop.t is required and agrees to abtl T[":,:i'^^dr .'a .GrrD rrhtess o'rerw** s#on atty 4. The E)e\,eroper is required and asrees !o slrDrDlt aflv | "'Tg"Hil'A; ti,ii.rs Jo-.n"ise s#oncatty noteo wirhin the comment
;;;itfi pl.;" are anired ln sny way btte( rlte autttorized s
@ntract9r
r loatlqD
area of this form).
DeveloPefs sgnahJre
F:\cdev\FORMSgef mits\PtanningDRB\Ulitit/ APProvalgSl 6{/'doc
Date
,1€-2007
i,{d80 :a t t00z 'l 'gflv L 'd f8/'0N /.'9U]|\l] SSOU] AIOH
XCEL
,Jul.;l3.Nl/.t
mmcvxtiT
SUMMIT CIY tax't91J.2624}5/ Jul 2/ 20tJl lulj/ z;'llP|'l !eal lind c0nsullanls,t|lc
UTII.ITY APPROVAL E VERTFICATION
8:55 P.01 lio,4b/i P.2/3
Tiig form sarycs to verlfy th{t the.prop$ed improveflenls wilt mt impgct any exigting or proposed udlity geruices, end ,lso to verry Eendce awillbilit anc locotton ior new c;nsrKtion rnd shoub'bC uici rn ony"unaildi"iq pr€garing your utility Dbn and scheddinq irutrllations. A rila Pbn, lnduding gcding plan floor pran, eno_geyguoijfsiia-riue ruarrneo to th€ follovrinE utilitiet brapptwal endv€tificsdo,r.Pt-E sEAtl.oiyuprozui::rs'roi-aipiovltdiidiirerrsrrorlrH!unury collPAlllEs, tf vou re unable to obein conmenrs wi$rin ttrat tmerrarJ;E;;c;il;#e town of Vail,
Davelcpslo pnrldc l,ot Addns Inhrmadon:
rotaac'.o,3824 t3Rlto LeriN6..E[dd *,aav*",F/6rbtA Sgzfii **, g LL
Aulhorired $isorlm Semmantg DITN
QWEsT
970,46E.6860(tel)
970.{68.0672 (fax)
Conbcb: Sam Tooley
4anuel, toolev0omst. tq![, XCEL HTGH Pf,EsSURE Grc
e70.262,4076 (ht)
970.{68.1101 (frr)
Conttct: Rictr Sicnsrof
riciard.lkff Sog@relencrov.aom
XOLY CRO!iS CIIERGY
970.9{7.542s (trD
970.9{9.q0u (fax)
Coobct: Diana Gollt
daolir(ohotoctotg,ooo
XCEL Errrgy
970.262.4038 (fEr)
970.t62.{024 (lel)
Contacts;
Kit Bbgen
EAGlg RN'ERWATER E
IiAilTTATION DISTRrCT
970.1t6,7{80 (teD
970.476.{089 (fax)
@ntlgt: Ffed HrSle!!
fhrqlee6eryxdnto
COttC 'lsfc ELE
e70.118.8248 (rel)
970,949.9r38 (hx)
Conbcts Davld Er,ans
dsJ[iiletrenrocahlesncr*com
rtsrE5..
1.41.07
1- lf the rnllq, dppro\rEt & vcrifiardon form has stgnsrures fyo?n :rcrt OJ lhe_qlliw- comFnlca, and nO qommem' lre madc dkecuy on hc form, or no acton s bken within a weefi ot 0re Utifiiyt nceipi of tiiq form'lffi'.rpr.naion the Town will presurn tfirt ttrcrc ate.no problcnrs and the devetop,nent cri pioceiJ,'-3. If ! utilry comDrny tus concqnr nttn tte proporud o,itt_Con, th€ uHfity rEpresentaHve Sh€ll note dincty on the uuiv wrllication lorm hlt then IE a Drobtcn u,rrich niedi iJue-res-orveo, ine issue rr'orri ftn uJca"ired in an sbch'ed rcttcr b rre Iillr:lH'b"[:*ter, P.aso keep h mlnd tr'ii ii is tr'iiesp*sturriv or tr'i:Lridi..In'*ry and the apefcant F resorve
f,Ji:ff"H:ff:T#.TjJ:|IlT"?.lT3'g*j"r$1ylgl1'!iliyp obbin a_pubris wry pcnnn ftom rhe orpe,rncnt of Puulc Wofis rt ltte Town of Valf,In.any pubtie dghtd-wjy or eisemorr wfthi^ the To^rn of Vail.
4..Th€ D6yqleprgr is requircd and igrees to ffiW r' r'r- '-ver,vEr r:
'EqrJrrE(t
drE agree; to tuomK 3ny rcvlsed drawingr.tolhe uullties fot ri-apfoa_iEi6ili--ncation lf the *l;Tffiffii: altered in anv *av after tt'. iirrnd'idlliiarua iatc (;-e,. 'ilili,.'#.an
.uy n*c ,ntd.,r" u'; -ir*r
Oevetopef
-
DItE
F:tc<tcv\FORl6\Permilt\Plenntn0URE\WW Aepruvrlo&l AOT.dac 5-te2@7
| 9?.A 4?6 s6L6 PffiE.A2 JUL 23 'A? 27.2a
Jul-23-2007 l6:20 Fron-ERl{SD 0?047640S9
I'IIIIITY AFPROVAL A VERIFTCATION
T-097 P.001/00t F-034
*ffic
Thls lorm serVes to veriil drat the proposed impKrv€ments will not impact any existing or proposed utllty.sellces, and also !0
u"rify iervice avallobllityinO toca6in for nsw consguction and shouh be used in aonjunctlon with preparing your utility plan and
sctretu[nS inst3lations. A sits plan, tncludlng grading plan, fioor plaq ?qd_q9!{9n:,Jha[ be s/bmitt€d b $e followlns utllitles
for approiat and rredficaton. piEAiE AUOW UP TO 2 WEEI(S FOR APPROVAT OR COl,lHEtlTs FRoH THE UTTUTY
cofipenrfs. If rlgu are unable to obbh comments Mthln that tlmeframe pleese conhdThe Town of Vall-
DavetoPer tu Ptovida Lot Acftrrse laformztlon:
subdtvts.ont1l|lWl -fuaD. Low, 9l I
Y*N,\["u*,-
LotAddressi
Authoriznd Siqnetute Gommenla Dato
QWEsT
970.458.5860(tcl)
970,168.0672(tdx)
Contacu: Sam Tooley
sEmuel.toolev@gwesLmm
XCEI HICH PRESSURE GAS
970.262.1075 (tel)
970.468.t101 (fax)
'ContrcB Rldr Sisnems
rida rd,slsnqoi@xaelenergy.com
HOLY CROSS EilERSY
970.947,5{25 (tel)
970.945,,108t (fax)
Confad: Diana Golis
ddolls@hotrGt@6s.conl
XcEl Energrf
e70.252.4{88 (fax)
970.262.,{021 (tcl)
Contacts:
Klt Bogen
Kethrvn. BooqtOXC.ELEN ER6Y.com
EAGLERIYERWATER&gAl|rfAlloll DrsTRlcr
970.,{76.7480 (tel)
970.176.4089 (rax)
Contnct fted Haslee
ftaslea6erwsd.oro
COMCASTCAELE
970.418.8248 (teD
970.99.e$8 (fd)
Contad: Davld Evans
dalp er/ans@@hh.esm$.eqq!
ilQTrs:
f- if tre Utilitv approral & rierirtcation form har signatures from e8dt of U€ utiilty- companies, and no @mments arc made dircctly
on the form, or hb actbn is hken wit'lrin 2 weelrs of fte Utllltyt recelpt of tho form wfthout explanatbn thg Tovvn will presume
that tfrere arc.no problems and he developmen! can p9ceed.
L f a udllty corirpany hbs concems witl the proposed or9tu61ion, $e utlllty representaWe shall note dirccdy 91 the utlllry
verificatlon firm Ut'at tfierc ls a problem whidr neeos to be tesofv€d, The isue shoulo then be detailed in an othdted lcfrer to ute
Town of Vai[ Horvwer, 4ease keep ln mlnd t iat it ls ths re+onsiHliw of 6e utility company and thc appli@nt !o rc$lve
identified pmblems.
3.IhesE i€dncatiorE do not refieve tfie contrircOr of the respdrslbillgy !g ob$m a Publc Way Pemit from tr|e DePeronent ot
Rrblic Wot|c il thc Town of Vail. Utiliv location? rnuSt !B oFfalncd bdott dlEqlnd ln any publk right'of.way or €asemcnt
wlthinti€TownolVall. Abuilrlingp€rmititn!4aPubllcWaYpcrnrittndmustlsottallqflreParatell.
4. The Dcrelopor ls required and aiiees to slibm:il any revFed dnwings to tfie utllltles br reapporal e re'verifiotlon lf the
srbmited ptans are att;red in any way after the authorizd signature datc (unless odremise gecifically noted lvlhln $e comment
area of hb form).
.\r *s- C.'+.--" '"o
os\'f
Lra\s"' ot€r@q'cF \t\ql{S'
7e-67
F:lcde{FoRIrlS\P€mllsulannhg\DR8\U0liU ApppvrL0}16{7.doc
Date
5.16-2007
AE/Z0lZO01 UOlf 14:t! FAx ,rUvz.5qrUo uulruAri'r qAl'l,E
..Aus,20' 2007 l0:20AM paak land consultants,inc
SD urruwAPPRovAl&wRrrcarron r(rwGwi,
lg)vv at vvz
No.47lB P. 2
This form serves to vedfy that the PDposed hprovements W|| not imps(t any exlsung or pmposed uffrty seryices, and algo to
veriry servlce avdllablllty and locadon fur new consmrction and should be used in conjunction wth prepan:ng your utitity phn and
scfieduling Infiltauons. A site dan, Includlng grading plan, Roor phn, and ele\rauong, siall be Eubmitted to the tulloldng rltilties
for appro\El and verlfica0on. PLE SE AIIoW UP TO 2 WEEI6 FoR APPROVAL oR @llMEt{Ts FRol'l THE UTILIW
GOMPAIIIES. [f you are mable to obbin comments within that Umeftame plede conhct The Toun of Vail.
Developer b Pmyidc Lot Addrss Information:
Lot Address:stau'ion EIlrLbd-Jg<$^ t*n' 8 -t-1-
Authorized Sionafule .Comments Date
....QwEsT
970.468.6860(td)
970.468.o672(ldx)
Contads: Sam Tooley
gmuel.@lgy@swest corn
XCEL IIT€}I PRESSUREGAS
e70.262-4076 (tel)
970.458.1a01 (fax)
Contact: Ridr Sisneros
richard-sbneroitaxe.lg|emy. com
r{olY.cRoss ENERGY
970-e47-5425 (td)
970.945-4081 (fax)
Contsacfi Dhna Golis
ctgolis@bdlycrosE Com
XCEL En€.rol
s70.262,4038 (fax)
9?0,262.a02{ (tcl)
Contads:
t-Ct Boecrt
Ka$ryn - &€ert@XCELENERGY-com
,i F4CTERn ER-WATER'&
SAUIIA:SONOISTRICT
970-476-7480 (tet)
970.476.4089 (rax)
contach Fr€d Hadee
ftadoc@crvnEd.oro
' /) ^ 17o'gJo-tlaB
on the form, or no adion is taken wl$in 2 weeK of the Utjlity's rEcelpt of the Form wftfnr,rt explanadon the Town will prezume
that tfierc are.no problems and tfie darelopmqnt can proceed,
Z. If a |Jtility @mpany has cDnerns wlth.0te proposed con*uction, t'|e uulity representaUve shall not€ rllrtcdy on the uullty
verlfication Form tlEt there is a probhm whict neede to b€ resolved. The issre should then b€ detailed in an athdred letter to tre
Torn of Vail. However, please keep in mind tllat lt le the rcsponsibility of the dility compary and the applicarf to resolve
identlfled problems,
3. these rrerifrtztions do not rdleve thc cont-actor of the re-sporisiHllty to obEln a Public Way P€rmit from the Departnent of
PuUic Works at the Town of Vail. Ulillfv locetiFgeJnust b6 qbblned-befora dlcglng In cny publlc dght-of-vfcy or cascrnent
wlthin the Town of Vall- A buflding pgtE|ft }s notl Publlc Wav nermiqjrEd mggt ElobFlned s:eDaatelv,.
4- The De"veloper is required and agre€s to $bmlt Eny r€vised drawings to the utifitles for r$approval & re.veriffratlon if the
subrnitM d.ns are altere.l in any way after the authorlzed signEbre date (unless otherarise specifically nded wlftln the @mment
area of thlt fom),
Dsvelopers Signature
:ffiHf#ffi.. M ,--.--- Btot
F:\cdev\FoRMS\Pormlls\Planoing\DRB\UUny Appto!€L05r1 6{7,dOo wk/w
Date
5-1F2007
LETOFSKY&DOMBROWSKI
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
COMMUNITY FIRST BANK BUILDING
1000 NORTH SUMMIT BOULEVARD,SUITE 210
P.O.BOX DRAWER 549
FRISCO,COLORADO 80443
(970)668-3373
FACSIMILE: (970)668-5666
DENVER DIRECT: (303)623-1166
STEVEN F.LETOFSKY EMAIL:steven @letofskydombrowski.com
CASS E.DOMBROWSKI cass @letofskydombrowski.com
July 8, 2002
Via Facsimile (970) 479-2452 and Regular Mail
Community Development Department
Planning and Environmental Commission
Town of Vail
Colorado 81657
Attention: Ms. Rodriguez
RE: PEC No.: PEC010052
Property Address: 3828 Bridge Road
Vail, Colorado
Legal Description: Lots 9 and 10, Bighorn Subdivision, 2' Edition -
Location - Lot 10, Bighorn Subdivision 2"
Parcel No.: 21011101009
Dear Ms. Rodriguez:
Please be advised that our office represents Dr.Norman Gaylis who is the owner of Lot 10,
Bighorn Subdivision, 2' Edition. Dr. Gaylis acquired the property in August, 2001, from
Jeff Dahl,as a result of a deed in lieu of foreclosure. Under the terms of the acquisition,Mr.
Dahl was obligated to complete all of the conditions required for approval of the
resubdivision of Lots 9 and 10. Unfortunately, Mr. Dahl did not complete all of the
conditions on a timely basis. We are currently attempting to negotiate a further agreement
with the owner of Lot 9, Bighorn Subdivision to carry out the original purposes of the
agreement between the parties as well as comply with the additional conditions for approval.
REC'D JUL 112002
•
Ms. Rodriguez
Page 2
July 8, 2002
As a consequence of the foregoing, Dr. Gaylis is requesting that the approval granted on
8/13/01,which requires that all the conditions be complied with within one year of such date
be extended for an additional 1-year period.
It is my understanding that this matter will be reviewed on a prompt basis and that you will
be in contact with me concerning the Commission's decision.
If you have any further questions or if I may be of any further assistance, please feel free to
contact me at your convenience.
Very truly •fir,rs,
St: .. 1
sps
cc: Dr. Norman Gaylis ( is facsimile)
t
Planning and Environmental Commission
ACTION FORM
Departrcnt of Community Devdopmert
75 South Font4€ Roa4 Vaif Coha(b 81657
tel: 970.48.2139 Jax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Projst llame: Frazier-Dahl Lots
Project Description:
Participants:
PrclectAddrees:
legal Dccription:
Parcel Number:
210111101008
Commcnts:
APPUCANT Steven James Riden Architect0S/071200I Phone: 949-4121
OWNER
Box 3238
Vail, Co
816s8
Li@nse:
HUMMINGBIRD CO
POFo,X2077
VAIL CO
81658
3826 LUPINE DR VAIL
10/022000 Phone:
PEC l{umber: PEC01O043
Minor Subdivision - Abandon property lines for LG 8,9,10 Bighom 2nd
location: Lots 8,9,10, Bighom 2nd
lofi 9&10 Block Subdivislon: BIGHORN 2ND ADDffiON
2r01111010G)
BOARD/STAFF ACTIOT{
Modon By:
Second By:
Vde:
Conditionr:
Brian Doyon
Doug Cahill
6-0
Actlon: APPROVED
Date of Approval= 08I2!l24{}?
g/12 ft.oo t
@ndr 8
(PLAN): No changes to these phns may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail sbff and/or the approprhte review committee(s).
Cond: CONflXH945
That the minor subdivision shall only valid if the variance from section 12-6D-5 b
abo approved.
Cond: CON00049,16
That the applicant shall revise the plat prior to recording, in accordance with the
Town's suMivision regulationt to indicate the total buiHable area on each
proposed lot, to delineate the buildable area on each propced lot, and to indi?te
the locations of all applicable hazards.
Cond: CON@(h947
That within one year of today's date (or prior to recording of the plat) the parking
within tie town right-of-way shall be renpved to @mply with all town sbndards.
ffi ;y'",t*"f#,*I0mi0t[Alf "ffimffi,8*a11b,?ffi#"'
web: www,cl.vail.co.ts
Proiect l{eme: Dahl Property PEC fiumbsr: PEC010052
Prclect Dcscription:
Variance from section 12-6D5 (minimum buildable area requirernent)
Participentr:
APPUCANT Sterren larnes Riden 07lt6l2$L Phone: 9494121
Box 3238
Vail, CO
816s8
Lftrnse:
OWNER HUMMINGBIRD CO 10/072000 Phone:
PO BOX 2077
VAIL CO
816s8
PtoJect Addrus: 3828 BRIDGE RD VAIL Locetlon: Lot 10, Bighorn 2nd
legal Deccrlption: Lo& 9&10 Block Subdivbion: BIGHORN 2ND ADDffiON
Parcel t{umber: 2101111010ff)
Cpmm€nb:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
lrlotion By: Brian Doyon
Sond By: Chas Bernhardt
Vde: 5-0
Cpnditions:
Planner: Ann Kjerulf
Action: APPROVED
Dateof Approvah WJ)AffiL
Sltgltoot
PEC Fee Paftl: $250.00
o
PLAN
PROJECT ORIENTATION / - Community Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME' 12:00 pm
MEMBERS PRESENT
Galen Aasland
Chas Bemhardt
Diane Golden
Brian Doyon
Doug Cahill
Dick Cleveland
Site Visits :1:00 pm
1. Weiss Lots - 3834 & 3E38 Bridge Road 2. FrazierlDahl Lots - 3816 & 3826 Lupine Drive, 3828 Bridge Road 3. Vail Village Inn - 100 E. Meadow Drive 4. Gateway Building - 12 Vail Road
George
NOTE: lf the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30
Public Hearinq - Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm
/l A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-5 ("Lot Area and Site Dimensions"), Vail Town
Code, and a final review of a minor subdivision located at 3834 and 3838 Bridge Road/ Lots
1'l & 12, Bighom Subdivision 2no Addition.
Applicant Gary Weiss, represented by Steve Riden, Architect Planner: Ann Kjerulf
MOTION: Chas Bemhardt SECOND: Dick Cleveland VOTE: 6-0
TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 27, 2OO1
A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-5 ("Lot Area and Site Dimensions"), Vail Town
Code, and a final review of a minor subdivision located at 3816 and 3826 Lupine Drive and
3828 Bridge Road/ Lots 8, 9, & 10, Bighom Subdivision 2nd Addition.
Applicant Jeff Dahl and June Frazier, represented by Steve Riden, Architect Planner: Ann Kjerulf
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: Doug Cahill VOTE:6-0
o
NING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS
Monday, August 13, 2001
MEMBERS ABSENT
John Schofield
*rr*
Driver:
2.
APPROVED MINOR SUBDIVISION WITH 3 CONDITIONS:
3.
o
' 1. That the minor subdivision shall only be valid if the variance from section 12-
6D-5 is also approved.
2. That the applicant shall revise the plat prior to recording, in accordance with
the Town's subdivision regulations, to indicate the total buildable area on
each proposed lot, to delineate the buildable area on each proposed lot, and
to indicate the locations of all applicable hazards.
3. That within one year of today's date (or prior to recording of the plat) the
parking within the town right-of-way shall be removed to comply with all town
standards.
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND:Chas Bemhardt VOTE:6-0
APPROVED VARIANCE
A request for a final review of the proposed parking management plan for the Vail Gateway,
located at 12 Vail Road / portions of lots O and N, Block 5D, VailVillage 1d Filing.
Applicant Mountain Owners, L.P., represented by Braun Associates Planner Allison Ochs
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: Diane Golden VOTE: 5-1 (Cleveland opposed)
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
'|.. That a staff report regarding the parking situation is transmitted to the PEC within
one year or when the office space is leased at 75o/o of capacity.
A request for the final review of a major amendment to Special Development District #6,
Vail Village Inn, to allow for the redevelopment of an existing hotel, located at 100 East
Meadow Drive, Lots M and O, Block 5-D, VailVillage 1d Filing.
Applicant Daymer Corporation, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: George Ruther
MOTfON: Dick Cleveland SECOND: Diane Golden YOTE: {2 (Cleveland &
Bemhardt opposed)
APPROVED RECOMMENDATION TO THE TOWN COUNCILWITH 22 CONDITIONS
AND THE FOLLOWING FINDING:
"Thatthe pnposed major anendment to Special Development District#6, Vail
Village lnn, c0mplies with the nine design citeia outlined in Secfion 12-94-8 of the
Town of Vail Municipal Cda The applicant, as required, has demonstnted to the
satishc-tion of the Commission that any adverse effEcfs of the requesbd &viations
from the development standards of the undeflying zoning arc outweighed by the
public benefrts provided or has demonsfrafed that one or mote of the development
sfandards is not applicable, or that a pnctical solution consisfenf with the public
rnteresf has been achieved. Further, the Commission finds that the requested
conditional use permit to allow for the opention of a fnc'tional fee club complies with
the applicable citeia and is consrsfent with the development goals and objectives
of the Town. Lastly, public notice of this public heaing has Druen senf fo adjaent
prcperty owners and published in a local newspaper of rccord in accodance with
Secfion 1 2-3-6C of the Town Cde."
4.
' 1. That the Developer submits detailed civil engineering drawings of the required off-site
improvements (street lights, drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalks, gr:ading, road improvements,
etc.) as identified on the off-site improvements plan to the Town of Vail Public Works
Department for review and approval, prior to application for a building permit.
2. That the Developer submits a detailed final landscape plan and final architectural elevations for
review and approval of the Town of Vail Design Review Board, prior to application for a building
permit.
3. The sdd approval time requirements and limitations of Section 12-9A-12 shall apply to this
major amendment and, in addition, the phasing of the construction of the hotel shall not be
permifted.
4. That the Developer submits the following plans to the Department of Community Development,
for review and approval, as a part of the building permit application for the hotel:a. An Erosion Control and Sedimentation Plan:b. A Construction Staging and Phasing Plan;c. A Stormwater Management Plan;d. A Site Dewatering Plan; and e. A Traffic Control Plan.
5. That the Developer receives a conditional use permit to allow for the construclion of Type lll
Employee Housing Units in Phase lV of the District, in accordance with Chapter 12-16, prior to
the issuance of a building permit, to provide housing on-site.
6. That the Developer submits a complete set of plans to the Colorado Department of
Transportation for review and approval of a revised access permit, prior to application for a
building permit.
7. That the Developer meets with the Town staff to prepare a memorandum of understanding
outlining the responsibilities and requirements of the required off-site improvements, prior to
second reading of an ordinance approving the major amendment.
8. That the Developer submiis a complete set of plans responding to the design concems
expressed by Greg Hall, Director of Public Works & Transportation, in his memorandum to
George Ruther, dated 12113/99. The drawings shall be submifted, reviewed and approved by
the Town Engineer, prior to final Design Review Board approval.
9. That the Developer records public pedestrian easements between the hotel and the Phase lll
Condominiums, between the hotel and the Phase V Building, and along the Vail Road frontage.
The easements shall be prepared by the Developer and submifted for review and approval of
the Town Attomey. The easements shall be recorded with the Eagle County Cleft &
Recorde/s Office prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy.
10. That the Developer records a deed-restriction, which the Town is a party to, on the Phase lV
property prohibiting the public use of the spa facility in the hotel. Said restriction may be
revoked if the Developer is able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Town that adequate
provisions for vehicle parking have been made to accommodate the public use of the spa. The
restriction shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a buiHing permit.
11. That the Developer submits a final exterior building materials list, a typical wall sections,
architectural details and a complete color rendering for review and approval of the Design
Review Board, prior to making an application for a building permit.
J
12. That the Developer submits a comprehensive sign program proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel
for review and approval of the Design Review Board, prior to the issuance of a Temporary
Certifi cate of Occupancy.
13. That the Developer submits a roof-top mechanical equipment plan for review and approval of
the Design Review Board prior to the issuance of a building permit. All roof-top mechanical
equipment shall be incorporated into the overall design of the hotel and enclosed and screened
from public view.
14. That the Developer posts a bond with the Town of Vail to provide financial security for the
125o/o of the total cost of the required off-site public improvements. The bond shall be in place
with the Town prior to the issuance of a building permit.
15. That the Developer installs bollards or similar safety devices at the intersection of the delivery
aooess driveway and the sidewalk along the South Frontage Road to prevent conflicls between
pedestrians and vehicles, prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy.
16. That the Developer studies and redesigns the entrance on the north side of the hotel across
from the entrance to the Gateway Building to create a morc inviting entrance or a design that
redirects pedestrians to another entrance. The final design shall be reviewed and approved by
the Design Review Board prior to the issuance of a building permit.
17. That the Developer coordinates efforts with the owners of the Gateway Building to create a
below ground access for loading and delivery to the Gateway from the Vail Plaza Hotel to
resolve potential loading and delivery @neems at the Gateway. lf a coordinated effort can be
reached the Developer shall submit revised plans to the Town of Vail Community Development
Department for review and approval, prior to the issuance of a building permit.
18. That the Developer revises the proposed floor plans for the Vail Plaza Hotel to provide freight
elevator access to the lowest level of the parking structure. The revised plans shall be
submifted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
19. That the Developer redesigns the proposed elevator tower to create an architectural featurc
atop the tower and revises the proposed building elevations and roof plan prior to final review
of the proposal by the Design Review Board. The Board shall review and approve the revised
design.
20. That the Developer, in cooperation with the Town of Vail Fublic Works Department design and
construct a left-tum lane on Vail Road and reconfigure the landscape island in the South
Frontage Road median to eliminate left-tums from the loading/delivery. The construction shall
be completed prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy.
21. That the Developer provides a centralized loading/delivery facility for the use of all owners and
tenants within Special Development District No. 6. Access or use of the facility shall not be
unduly restricted for Special Development Districl No. 6. The loading/delivery facility, including
docks, berths, freight elevators, service conidors, etc., may be made available for public and/or
private loading/delivery programs, sanctioned by the Town of Vail, to mitigate loading/delivery
impacts upon the Vail Village loading/delivery system. The use of the facility shall only be
permitted upon a finding by the Town of Vail and the Developer that excess capacity exists.
The Developer will be compensated by the Town of Vail and/or others for the common use of
the facility. The final determination of the use of the facility shall be mutually agreed upon by
the Developer and the Town of Vail.
22. That the Developer submits a wriften letter of approval from adjacent properties whose property
is being encroached upon by certain improvements esulting from the construction of the hotel,
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
5. A request for a final review and recommendation to the Vail Town Council of proposed text
amendments to the Vail Town Code, Chapters 12-7H & l, Lionshead Mixed Use 1 &
Lionshead Mixed Use 2, to amend the regulations regarding commercial ski storage and to
amend Chapter 12-2, Definitions, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: Diane Golden VOTE: $1 (Cleveland opposed)
RECOMMENDATION OF DENIAL TO THE TOWN COUNCIL to allow commercial ski
storage as an accessory use on all levels of a building in the LMU1 & LMU2.
6. A request for a final review and recommendation to the Vail Town Council of proposed text
amendments to the Vail Town Code, Chapter 12€1, Housing Zone District, and Chapter 12-
2, Definitions, to allow for additional uses and to amend definitions in regard thereto.
Applicant Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs
MOTION: Chas Bemhardt SECOND: Brian Doyon VOTE: 5-1 (Aasland opposed)
REGOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO THE TOWN COUNCIL WITH 2 CONDITIONS:
1. That an amendment procedure be added to the Management Plan requirement.2.
.
That the criteria regarding affordability be reviewed by the Town Attomey.
7. A staff report on an approval of a minor amendment to SDD #5, Vail Run, to allow for the
remodel of an egress staircase, located at 1000 Lionsridge Loop/Lot C-11, Lions Ridge
Filing 1.
Applicant Vail Run Resort Community Association, Inc.
Planner: Brent Wilson MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
STAFF DECISION UPHELD
8. A request for a final review and recommendation tb the Town Council for the adoption of
two view conidors within Lionshead, as identified within the Lionshead Redevelopment
Master Plan. View Conidor 1 is located approximately at the main pedestrian exit looking
southwest towards the Gondola lift line. View Conidor 2 is located approximately from the
pedestrian plaza at the east end of the Lifthouse Lodge looking south up the Gondola lift
line. A more specific legal description of the tuo view conidors is on file at the Community
Development Department.
Applicant . Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs
TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 27, 2OO1
9. A request for a final review and a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the Town of
Vail's proposed amendment to the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan, located at
EastMest Meadow Drive, Vail Village.
Applicant Town of Vail Planner: George Ruther
TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 27,2OO1
1 0. A request for a variance from Title 14 (Development Standards) Town Code, to allow for
improvements to an existing residEntial private drive, located at 1450 Buffehr Greek
Road/Lot 2, Cliffside Subdivision.
Applicant Mike Young
Planner: Brent Wilson
WITHDRAWN
11. Approval of July 23, 2001 minutes
12. lnformation Update
.:. CAPA Aspen Conference logistias
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planne/s office located at the Town of Vail Community
Devefopment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Chololtcld Moorn
1480 Bobns poiu Rd.wa:za'e'MN.5539l
YfB G. & Janet S. Beoedict 5X)08 QuincvAve.
Cherrytflls, CO. eOttr
eraryW
l05l P I\tralabar 6
PslnB I FL. 32905
MftooR & C. JrncBronn
P.O. Box7010
nodftrd,IL. 61125
o
Dcav€r, CO. SO202
Lupine partersbip
3307 l9th Ave.
Keamey, NE. 68845
'
Jrocs R & ldaribrn J. Loftrs
1899 Wlnkoop St. Ste 425
HenryR pratt
3827 B LupineIh.
VEil, CO.81657
Ilannal^angger
3807LupfuIh.
V8tl, CO. t1657
o
THIS
a
PROPERTY ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Seclion 12-3€ of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on August 13, 200'1, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In
consideration of:
A staff reporl on an approval of a minor amendment to SDD #5, Vail Run, lo allow for the
remodel of an egress staircase, located at 1000 Lionsridge Loop/Lot G11, Lions Ridge Filing 1.
Applicant: Vail Run Resort Community Association, Inc.Planner Brent Wilson
A request for a variance from Section 12-AD-S ("Lot Area and Siie Dimensions"), Vail Town
Code. and a final review of a minor subdivision located at 3834 and 3838 Bridge Road/ Lots 11
& 12, Bighom Subdivision 2no Addition.
Applicant: Gary Weiss, represented by Steve Riden, Architesl
Planner: Ann Kjerulf
A request for a variance from Section 12-6D5 ("Lot Area and Site Dimensions"), Vail Town
Code, and a final review of a minor subdivision located at 3816 and 3826 Lupine Drive and 3828
Bridge Road/ Lots 8, 9, & 10, Bighom Subdivision 2d Addition.
Applicant: Jeff Dahl and June Frazier, represented by steve Riden, Architect
Planner: Ann Kjerulf
A request for a variance from Title 14 (Development Standards) Town Code, to allow for
improvements to an existing residential private drive, located at 1450 Buffehr Creek Road/Lot 2,
Cliffside Subdivision.
Applicant Mike Young Planner: Brent Wilson
A request for a final review and recommendation to the Vail Town Gouncil of proposed text
amendments to the Vail Town Code, Chapter 12-61, Housing Zone District, and Chapter 12-2,
Definitions, to allow for additional uses and to amend definitions in regard therelo.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Allison Ochs
A request for the final review of a major amendment to Special Development District #6, Vail
Villaje Inn, to allow for the redevelopment of a.n existing hotel, located at 100 East Meadow
Drive, Lots M and O, Block $D, Vail Village 1" Filing.
Applicant Daymer Corporation, represenied by Jay Peterson
Planner: George Ruther
A request for a final review and recommendation to the Vail Town Council of proposed text
amendments to the Vail Town Code, Chapters 12-7H & l, Lionshead Mixed Use 1 & Lionshead
Mixed Use 2, to amend the regulations regarding commercial ski storage and to amend Chapter
12-2, Definitions, and setting forth details in regards thereto.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Allison Ochs
A request for a recommendation lo the Town Council for the adoptiol of two view conidors
within Lionshead, as identified within the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. View Conidor
1 is located approximately at the main pedestrian exit looking southwest towards the Gondola lift
line. View Coriidor 2 is ldcateO approximately from the pedestrian plaza at the east end of the
Lifthouse Lodge looking south up'the Gondola lift line. A mole specific legal description of the
two view conidors is on file at the Community Development Department.
Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs
A request for a final review of the proposed parking management plan forthe Vail Gateway,
located at 12 Vail Road / portions of lots O and N, Block 5D, Vail Village 1o Filing.
Applicant: Mountain Owners, L.P., represented by Braun Associates
Planner: Allison Ochs
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during fegular
office hours in ihe project planne/s office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development
Department, 75 Soutti Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site
visits thai precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.
Pfease call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Departmeni
Published July 27,2001 in the Vail Trail.
Mnroru R. Bnowu
24X' CLINION ROAD . ROCKFORD, ILLINONS 611G}
July L8, 2001
The Town of Vail
Community Development Department
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Attention: Ann Kierulf
Subj: Subdivision proposals for Bridge Street -D
Dear Ms. Kjerulf:
On two occasions I have discussed with you the subdivision
proposals for lots located on the south end of Bridge Street. lt
seems to me that this particular area is not appropriate for the
construction of residences. The area is very steep as it rises with
the mountain and many of the trees that shape the natural beauty
of East Vail would have to be removed. I would think that it could
also destabilize the land in an already avalanched designated
area.
I would appreciate it if the Planning and Environmental
Commission would take these factors into consideration.
Very truly yours,
lh$ {c-a'-----,Milt Brown
vucs ons j Lalt tnc rlannlng )tar at q lr-/l ll
GENERALINFORMATION
This application is for any projcct rcquiring approvat by thc Planning and Environmcntal Commission. For spccific
information. scc thc submittal rcquircmcnts- for thc particular approual that is rcquestcd, Thc application can not bc acccptcd until all required information is submittcd. Thc projciimay also necd to bc rcvicwcd 6y thc Town Council
and./or thc Dcsign Rcvicw Board.
ettt"tcorroN FoR pr,ANNrNc lb rnu,*oNMENTAL
COMMISSION APPROVAL
Amcndrncnt to an Approvcd Dcvolopmcnt Plan
Employcc Housing Unit (typc:
Major or tl Minor CCI Extcrior Alteration
tr
tr
tr
(VailVllagc)
tr Major or tl Minor CCII ExtcriorAlteration
(Lionshead)
tr Spccial Dcvclopmcnt Distsict tr Major or 0 Minor Amcndmcnt to an SDD
B,D.ESCRrprrON OFTHEREQuEST: EZ E L 16 ? gAa UAT Lrl ,ooo 1a.I ltutr=OLfuv-E lZ- bY> - Fz
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
. tr Additional GRFA (250)
tl Bcd and Brcaldast tr Conditional Usc Pemit tr Major or E Minor Subdivision tr Rczoning
tr, , SiC, Variancc
A Variancc tr Zoning CodeAmcndmcnt
TOWNOFYAIL
c.LOCATION
ADDRESS:
Lor)-Q-BLocK- FrLtNc OF PROPOSAL:
%%Zon t BUILDINC NAME:to/@E
Ez\ &'Uu(!{t 2$O
F.
G.
D.ZONING:4atJo^^
NAME OF OWNER(S);(?A.t+t
MAILING ADDRESS:40 at
PHONE:
owNER(S) S TGNATURE(S);
NAME OF REPRESENTATTVE:JAh4 .rl LDaATTW
MAILINGADDRESS:VAtL
PH
H. FEE - SEE THE SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPROPRIATE FEE.
STJBMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE F'EE TO THE
DEPARTMENT oF COMMITNITY DEVELOPMENT, z5 soUTH FRONTAGE ROAD,
VAIL, COLOMDO 816s7.
Roixd6ngr1*^ t,a(
frr,g;l:t1_*4
.FeoPaid;rl-8) cw:_bK_lV._By:
. Application Datc:- pEC Mccting Dut.,__5lj..=
JIJL IC il
EN
POST O --\ VAI
V Llllr f,;RID FAX 949-0304 , (970) 949-412I
L, CO.816s8
July 12, 2001
Department of Community Development
Town ofVail
75 Frontage Road
Vail. CO 81657
Frazier /Dahl, 3826 Lupine Road
Lot 8, Lot 9 and Lot 10, Bighorn 2nd Addition
Dear Members of the Planning and Environmental Commission
The variance request is in regards to zoning regulation l2-6d-5 " minimum lot area
shall be 15,000 square feet ofbuildable area" ( buildable area defined as areas not
in red hazard, flood plain or greater than 40% ). Reliefis sought in this literal
interpretation. Existing lots are below standards set by this regulation, New lots
created by the minor subdivision ( realigning of existing lot lines between lots
8, 9 and l0 ) will not change existing conditions.
The realignment of lot line between lot 8 and lot 9 will allow for future expansion
of existing structure on lot 9, otherurise unable to do practically due existing site
conditions ( large boulders and mature trees ). Lots 8 and 9 are both owned by
Mrs. Frazier.
There was a request by the planning staffand environmental commission tlat the lot
division between 8, 9 and l0 be straighter without elaborate angles or sharp tums. This
then would change the lot division between l0 and 8 as proposed. Lot l0 will maintain
existing density, as well as lot 8 and 9.
Lot 8 2 dwelling units / I employee housing unit
Lot 9 I dwelling unit / I employee housing unit
Lot l0 I dwelling unit / I employee housing unit
The plat will also create an environmental easement near the edge of the " high
hazard" snow or debris avalanche zone.
,MEMBERoFAMERIcANINsTITUTEoFARcHITEcTS.
t'
Frazier / Dahl Property
Adjacent property owneru:
Lot 7 Bighorn lst
James R. & lvlar'ilyn J. Loftus
| 899 Wynkoop St. Ste 425
Denver, CO. 80202
I.ct2 Lupine Partership
3307 l9th Ave.
Kearney, NE. 68845
Henry R. Pratt
3E27 B Lupine Dr.
Vail, CO. 81657
Lot3 HannaLangegger
3807 Lupine Dr.
V&il, CO. 81657
Lot4 CholeHeldMoran
l4E0 Bohns Point Rd.
Wafzata" MN. 55391
LotT Nicolas G. & Janet S. Benedict
5900 E Quincy Ave.
CherryHiils, CO. EOlll
Lot ll GaryWeiss
l05l Port Malabar 6
Palm Bay, FL. 32905
Lot 13 Mlton R. & C. Jane Brown
P.O. Box 7010
Rockford, IL.61125
o
l*l'|*lf tti+l+l*ll*****|}l*****'i***t*rt*!t*******{r*'t'llll+f l*r}t*****rl**rl**l*l'l***'}r}'t***t*++++'}'}**t
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statement **+**ff*t**'|'rl*l**'lt*'t****{tlt**+**+****+*fif*****t'}*:tttirl't*|t'f********a++*+l'}*t'}a*t***'}'}**'}*'}
statement lfumber: R000001074 Amount: $250.00 07/L6l2ooLo2:37 Pll
Payment l{ethod: Check Init: JAR
Notation: 68t2
Permit No: P8C010052 Type: PEC - Variance
Parcel l{o: 210111101008
Site Addreee: 3815 LUPINE DR VAU.'
Location: Lots 8, 9 10
Total Fees: $250.00
Thie Payment: $250.00 Total ALL hts: $250.00
Balance: 50.00
ft*+++*a** *'**'l*'|'t*{r'l'l't ************ * *'}*** * *****,lr*'ll.'t****'}*** *******l't'}*,}***'l '}'l'}*****+****'}** *
ACCOI.JNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Descri pt'ion Current ffis
PV ()()1OOOO3I125OO PEC APPLICATION FEES 250.00
O O At^
rHrs rrEM tg"Ht'SRlI8ER PR.PERTY %j'.^
ion of the ro*,n o)JL,''!t ^Vaif wifl hold a public hearing in accordance dittr Seaion 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the "V
Town of Vail on July 9, 2001, et 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. ln
consideration of:
A request for a final review of a minor subdivision proposal, located at 3834 & 3838 Bridge
Road/ Lots 11 &'12, Bighom Subdivision 2d Addition.
Applicant:
Planner:
Gary Weiss, rEpresenl€d by Steve Riden, Architect
Ann Kjerulf
A request for a final review of a minor subdivision proposal, located at 3816, 3826, and 3828
Bridge Road/ Lots 8, 9, & 10, Bighom Subdivision 2nd Addition.
Applicant: Jeff Dahl and Julie Frasier, represented by Steve Riden, Architect Planner: Ann Kjerulf
The applications and information aboui the proposals are evailable for public inspec{ion during regular
office hours in rhe project planne/s office, located at the Town of Vail iommunity Developmeirt -
Department, 75 Souih Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend projec.t oriintation ind the site
Yisits thatpre_cele the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Devbbpment Department.
Pfease call 47$2'138 for information.
Sign fanguage interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Plcase crtll 475
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published June22,2001 in the VaitTrait.
Y
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEIIORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
June 25, 2001
A request for a worksession to discuss a minor subdivision proposal,
located at 3816, 3826, and 3828 Bridge Roadi Lots 8, 9, & 10, Bighorn
Subdivision 2no Addition.
Applicant: June Frazier and Jetf Dahl, represented by Steve Riden Planner: Ann Kjerulf
il.
DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUEST
The applicants, June Frazier and Jeff Dahl, represented by Steve Riden, have submitted
an application to the Town of Vail Community Development Department lor a minor
suMivision of Lots 8, 9, and 10, Bighorn Subdivision, Second Addition. The request is for
the reconfiguration of the property lines shared by these three lots. Pursuant to the Vail
Town Code, 13-2-2 (E), a minor subdivision is defined as follows:
'Minor subdivision" shall mean any suMivision containing not more than
four (4) lots fronting on an existing street, not involving any new street or
road or the extension of Municipal facilities aN not adversely affecting the
development of the remainder of the parcel or adjoining property."
Cunently, Lot I is 0.87 Acres in size, Lot 9 is 0.34 Acres in size, and Lot 10 is 0.30 Acres
in size. With a resubdivision of these lots, Lot 8 would be 0.825 Acres in size, Lot 9 would
be 0.372 Acres in size, and Lot 10 would be 0.367 Acres in size. The total area under
consideration is 1.56 Acres. There are currently no development proposals for any of the
lots. However, statt anticipates that these would be forthcoming if the minor suMivision
is approved.
STAFF RECOMUENDATION
Because this is a worksession, stafl is not making a formal recommendation to the
Planning & Environmental Commission at this time. Staff will provide a formal
recommendation at the final review of the request. This review is tentatively scheduled
for July 9, 2001.
BACKGROUND
The Bighorn Subdivision, Second Aclrtition was platted on July 22, 1963. The Board ol
County Commissioners of Eagle County approved the platting as the property was then
under Eagle County jurisdiction. Lots 8, 9, & 10 have remained in the cunent
configuration since being platted.
The Bighom SuMivision, Second Addition was annexed into the Town of Viil pursuant to
Ordinances 13 & 20, Series of 1974. The annexation became eflective on November 5,
1 974. Upon annexation into the Town of Vail, Lots 8, 9, & 10 were zoned Two Family
Primary/Secondary Residential. At the time of annexation, a residential structure existed
on Lot 9, and Lots I and 10 were both vacant.
Hazard Regulations
In 1976, the Town of Vailcontracted with Arthur l. Mears to complete a Geologically
Sensitive Areas Study. For purposes of the study geologically sensitive areas were
defined as snow avalanche, rock fall and debris flow. In response to the findings of Mr.
Mears' study the Town ol Vail adopted Geologic Hazard Maps for snow avalanche, rock
fall and debris flow as components of the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan. The maps
were adopted by the Town in 1977.
In 1978, the Town of Vail adopted Hazard Regulations. The purpose of the regulations is
to help protect the inhabitants of the Town from dangers relating to development ot flood
plains, avalanche paths, steep slopes, and geologically sensitive areas; to regulate the
use of land areas which may be geologically sensitive; and lurther to regulate
development on steep slopes; to protect the economic and property values of the Town,
to protect the aesthetic and recreational values and natural resources of the Town, which
are sometimes associated with llood plains, avalanche areas and areas of geologic
sensitivity and slopes; to minimize damage to public facilities and utilities and minimize
the need for relief in cleanup operations; to give notice to the public of certain areas
within the Town where flood plains, avalanche paths and areas ol geologic sensitivity
exist; and to promote the general public health, safety and welfare.
Town of Vail land U* Plan
In 1986, the VailTown Council adopted the Town of Vail Land Use Plan. Similar to the
Geologic Hazard Maps, the Land Use Plan is a component of the Town of Vail
Comprehensive Plan. According to the Land Use Plan, Lots 8, 9, & '10 are designated
'low density residential". The purpose of the low-density residential designation is to
provide sites for single-family detached homes and two{amily chrelling units. Density of
development with in this category would typically not exceed 3 structures per buildable
acre. Also within lhis area would be private recreation facilities such as tennis courts,
swimming pools, and club houses for the use of residents of the area. Institutional/public
uses permitted would include churches, fire stations, and parks and open space related
facilities.
TIE Town of Vail Comprelcnsive Open lands Plan
ln 1994, the Vail Town Council adopted the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan. The
objectives ol the plan are:
. To identify citizen and visitor needs and prelerences for a comprehensive system of
I
a
a
open space uses such as parks, recreation, protection of environmental resources,
trails, and to reserve lands for public use;
To prioritize available open lands for acquisition or protection;
To identify creative strategieE to implement the acquisition and protection program;
To define a management system to appropriately manage Town-owned open space
lands, and;
To buffer neighborhoods with open space.
The Comprehensive Open Lands Plan is an action-oriented plan that identifies
specilic parcels of land that require some kind ol action either for protection of
sensitive lands, for trail easements, or for public use. In developing the plan, over
350 parcels were evaluated with 51 parcels on which actions were recommended.
The recommendations were developed utilizing specific criteria to evaluate the areas
of highest priority. Generally, areas received the highest priority if they met the stated
objectives of the Town and its citizens and were an integral part of the open lands
system. Within the 51 parcels, there are five priority areas made up of a number of
recommended actions. These priorities are:
. Protect sensitive natural habitat areas, riparian areas, and hazard areas;. Extend the VailTrail to East Vail and add several trailheads lo access the trail;. Add a new trail on the north side and western half of Town to connect existing
trailheads and neighborhoods ;. Add three "trailheads" in the core areas to access Vail Mountain trails and inform
visitors of trail opportunities and provide better access to Gore Creek;. Add bike lanes to the north and south frontage roads and add paved shoulders to Vail
Valley Drive.
To date, the Town of Vail has taken action on at least 41 of the 51 parcels identified for
action in the Plan. This most recently includes Lot 16 of Bighom Subdivision, 2no
Addition.
The Action Plan and Priority Plan of the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan identifies Lots
8, 10, and 11, Bighorn Subdivision, Second Addition as'Parcel 40" for implementation
purposes. Parcel 40 is classified as a "High Prioritf. The high priority classification is
based upon the Town's desire to acquire both the development rights and trail easements
for the proposed South Trail extension. The plan also notes that Parcel 40 is located in a
geologically sensitive area. Strategies for protecting Parcel 40 include purchasing the
development rights, and/or acquiring an access easement through the parcel.
As a high priority classification, Parcel 40 meets both Level One and Level Two
Evaluation criteria. Level One Evaluation focuses on meeting community needs relating
to the natural resource system, the recreation system, trails system, and reserving lands
for future civic/public uses. Level Two Evaluation focuses on the availability of the parcel
utilizing criteria such as the threat of development or irreversible damage, opportunities to
leverage other funds, cost, unusual opportunity with a motivated seller, opportunity lor
trade with the USFS, low management requirements on the Town of Vail and low liability
to the Town.
The Town of Vail Zoning Gode prescribes the land development regulations lor
development within the Town. The following code sections are particularly relevant to the
evaluation of the applicant's proposal:
Chapter 6 - Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential
Chapter 21 - Hazard Regulations
The purpose statement of Chapter 6 (Article D. Two-Family Primary/Secondary
Residential (PS) Distric0 states:
'The Two-Family Primary/Secondary ResidentialDistrict is intended to
provide sites for single-family residential uses or two-family residential
uses in which one unit is a larger primary residence and the second unit is
a smaller caretaker apartment, together with such public facilities as may
approperiately be located in the same distict. The Two-Family
Primary/Secodary Besidential District is intended to ensure adequate
light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling, commensurate with
single-family and twolamily occupancy, and to maintain the desirable
residential qualities of such sites by establishing appropriate site
developm e nt sta/ld,ards. "
To date, there is no structure on Lot 8 or on Lot 10. The applicants wish to reapportion
the development potential among these three lots in order to accommodate future
development. There are geologic hazards on this lot including avalanche and rockfall
(see Figures 6 & 7 attached).
The purpose statement of Chapter 21(Hazard Regulations) states:
'The puryose of this Chapter is to help protect the inhabitants of the Town
from dangers relating to development of flood plains, avalanche paths,
steep s/opes and geologically sensitive areas; to r,egulate the use of land
areas which may be subject to flooding and avalanche or which may be
geologically sensitive; and further to regulate development on steep
slopes; to protect the economic and propefty values of the Town, to
protect the aesthetic and recreational values and natural resources of the
Town, which are sometimes associated with flood plains, avalanche areas
and areas of geological sensitivity and slopes; to minimize damage to
public facilities and utilities and minimize the need for relief in cleanup
operations; to give notice to the public of cenain areas within the Town
where flood plains, avalanche areas and areas of geologic sensitivity exist;
and to promote the general public heafth, safety and welfare."
Furthermore, Section 12-21 -1O (Hazard Begulations) states:
A. No structure shall be buift in any flood hazard zone or red avalanche
hazard areas. No structure shall be built on a slope of foru percent or
greater except in single-Family Residential, Two-Family Besidential, or
Two-Family Primary/Secondary Besidential Zone Districts. The term
"structure" as used in thrs Section does not include recreational
structures that are intended for seasonal use, not including residential
use.
Structures may be built in blue avalanche hazard areas provided that
proper mitigating measures have been taken.
The Administrator may require any applicant or person deshing to build
in an avalanche hazard zone of influence to submit a definitive study of
the hazad area in which the applicant proposes to build if the Town's
master hazard plan does not contain sufficient information to
determine if the proposed location is in a red hazard or blue hazard
area. The requirement for additional information and study shall be
done in accordance with Chapter 12 of this Title.
D. The Administrator may require any applicant or person desiring to build
in an identified blue avalanche hazard zone to submit additional
information or reports as to whether or not improvements are required
to mitigate against the possible hazard..lf mitigation is required, said
information and report should specify the improvements proposed
therefore. The required information and reports shall be done in
accordance with Chapter 12 of this Title.
The Town has adopted Official Hazard Maps (as described in section 12-2'l-15:
Restrictions in Geologically Sensitive Areas) which identify areas located within or
potential within rockfall, debris flow, or avalanche areas. Subdivision and/or development
proposals within any geological hazard area requires a site-specific geologic
investigation: According to section 12-21-15:
1. ln any area located within the boundaries of the Lincoln DeVore Map, or in any
area identified as a debris tlow or debris avalanche area by the Mears Map, or
in any area identified as a rock fall area by the Schmueser Map, no initial
application for a building permit, grading permit or major or minor suMivision
shall be approved until a site-specific geologic investigation is complete. For
the purpose of this Section, a site-specific Aeologic investigation shall be
deemed a detailed geologic investigation which is applicable to each
respective site. All reports and studies required by fh,s Section shall be
prepared by a "professionalgeologist", as defined by Colorado Revised
Statufes section U-|-01 , as amended, or a "registered protessional engineer',
as defined by Colorado Revised Statutes section 12-2U102, as amended,
under the direction of and at the expense of the owner/applicant and
submifted to the Depaftment of Community Development.
2. The extent of the site-specific ecologic investigation required shall be
determined by the geologist or engineer who is responsible for the
investigation; however, the investigation shall be of sufficient thorougnness
and accuracy to allow such expeft to ceftify to the following:
a. For all structures other than singleJamily, duplex and primary/secondary
dwellings, and "accessoty uses" thereto as defined in Section 12-6C-4 of
this Code:
(1) Whether the geologic conditions are such that the site can or cannot be
developed for the specific structure or use proposed without conective
engineering or engineered construction, or other mitigation or
afterations.
(2) Whether corrective engineering or engineered construction, or other
B.
c.
mitigation or alterations can or cannot be accomplished to reduce the
danger to the public health, safety or to property due to problems
related to geologic sensitivity to a reasonable level, and not increase
the hazad to other propefties or structures, or to public buildings,
rights of way, roads, streets, easements, utilities or facilities or other
properties of construction.
b. For single-family, duplex and primary/secondary dwellings, and "arcessory
uses" thereto as defined in Seaion 12-6C-4 of this Title, the site-specific
geolqic investigation shallceftify to the following:
(1) Whether the site can be developed for the specific structure or use
proposed without conective engineering or engineered construction or
other mitigation or alterations; or
(2) That the s,te is a geologically sensitive area but development will not
increase the hazard to other property or structures, or to public
buildings, rights of way, roads, streets, easements, utilities or facilities
or other properties of any kind.
In order to provide reasonable notice to the public ol the problems related to geologically
sensitive areas, notice regulations and requirements (Section 12-21-15(F)) have been
adopted. One of these requirements is that:
1. All suMivision plats recorded after the effective date hereof shall identify and
designate each lot and block, or portions thereof, located within any
geologically sensitive area, together with applicable sub-zone designations, by
a stamp or writing in a manner providing reasonable notice to interested
pafties.
III. ZONING ANALYSTS
LOT 8, BIGHORN SUBDIVISION, SECOND ADD]TION
Zoning Two-family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS)
Existing Lot Size 0.87 Acres (37,888 sf)
Proposed Lot Size 0.825 Acres (35,937 s0
Standard Allowed Existino Prooosed
Density: 2DUs+1EHU 0 2DUs+1EHU
GRFA: 6,889 sf 0 sf 6,694 sl
Site Coverage: 7,578 sf 0 sf 7,187 sl
Setbacks: Front -20 ft. nta 20 n.
Sides-15 ft. nla 15 n.
Rear- 15ft. nla 15ft.
Landscaping: 22,733 sl undeveloped 21,562
Building Height: 33'max undeveloped 33'max
* W g rs wr vtndeotkyeL iat .
LOT 9, BIGHORN SUBDIVISION, SECOND ADDITION
Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS)Zoning
Existing Lot Size 0.34 Acres (14,941 sf)
Proposed Lot Size 0.372 Acres (16,204 s0
CurrentlY Standard Allowed Existino
Proposed
Alloucd
Density:
GRFA:
Site Goverage:
Sebacks:
Landscaping:
1DU+1EHU 1DU
4,160 sf (+250)
2,988 sf
Front -20 ft.
Sides-15 ft.
Rear- 1Sft.
8,956 sf
2DUs+lEHU
4,720 sf (+250)
9,241 sl
20ft
15 ft
15 ft
9,722 st
33'max Building Height 33'max
-The existing development statistics for Lot I are not known.
Density:
GRFA:
1 DU+ 1 EHU
3,650 sf
Site Coverage: 2,580 sf
Selbacks: Front-20ft.
Sides-15 ft.
Rear- 1sft.
Landscaping: 7,739 sf t
Building Height: 33'max t
.Lot '10 is an undevelooed lot.
LOT 10, BIGHORN SUBDIVISION, SECOND ADDTTPN
Zoning Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS)
Existing Lot Size 0.30 Acres (12,898 sf)
Proposed Lot Size 0.367 Acres (15,986 sf)
Currently Proposed
Standard Allowed Existino Allorved
2 DUs+ I EHU
4,697 sf
3,197 sf
20 fr
15 ft
15ft
9,592 sf
33'max
V. trllNOR SUBDIVISION CRITERIA
A basic premise of subdivision regulations is that the minimum standards for the creation
of new lots must be met. This subdivision will be reviewed under Title 13, Subdivision
Regulations, of the Town of Vail Code.
A. The lirst set of criteria to be considered by the Planning and Environmental
Commission for a Minor Subdivision application is:
Lot Area: According to Section 12-60-5 of the Town of Vail Zoningflegulations,
the minimum lot or site area in the Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential
District is 15,000 sf ol buildable area.
Stf/tt Reqon*..Statf anticipates that the proposed lots (Lots 8, 9, & 10) would
comply with the minimum lot area requirement. However, buildable area excludes
red hazard avalanche areas, floodplain areas, and areas with slopes greater than
40olo. Buildable area has yet to be determined because surveys of Lots 8, 9, & 10
have not yet been submitted to the Community Development Department and
there is the potential for red hazard avalanche and slopes greater than 40% to
exist on these lots.
Frontaoe: According to Section 12-6D-5 oi the Town of Vail Regulations, each lot
in the Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential District shall have a minimum
frontage of thirty (30) feet.
St8/ff nes'ionsF''The proposed lots (Lots 8,I & 10) complywith the minimum
frontage requirement.
pi4!S: According to Section 12-6D-5 of the Town of Vail Regulations, each
lot in the Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residenlial District shall be of a size and
shape capable of enclosing a square area 80 feet on each side within its
boundaries.
Slaff Beryonse.'The size and shape of each proposed lot complies with this
requirement.
B. The second set ol review criteria to be considered with a minor subdivision
request is outlined in the Subdivision Regulations, 13-3-4, and is as follows:
'The burden ot proof shall rest with the applicant to show that the
apptication is in compliance with the intent and purposes of lhls Chapter,
the Zoning Ordinance and other peftinent regulations that the Planning
and Environmental Commission deems applicable....The Planning and
Environmental Commission shall review the application and consicler its
appropriateness in regard to Town policies relating to suMivision control,
densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and resolutions and other
applicable documents, environmental integrtty and compatibility with the
sunounding land uses and other applicable documents, effects on the
aesthetics of the Town."
The purpose section of Title 13, Subdivision Regulations, is intended to insure that
suMivision is promoting the health, safety and welfare of the community. The
subdivision purpose stiatements from 13-1-2 (C) are as follows:
1. 'To inform each suflivider of the standards and citeria by which development
proposals wilt be evaluated and to provide information as to the type and extent of
i m p rove m e nt s req u i red. "
Stalt Reqon*:
Staff has ierformed a preliminary review of the minor subdivision lor compliance
with the applicable evaluation criieria. Statf is not yet able to determine if the
applicable criteria have been satisfied because no survey information for Lots 8,
9, & 10 has been submitted.
2. "To provide for the sudivision of property in the future without conflict with
development on adiacent land."
Slaff Beryonse;
The Vail Land Use Plan identifies Lots 8, 9, & 10 as areas for "low density
residential" development. According to the Vail Land Use Plan, the purpose of the
"low density residential" designation is to provide sites for single{amily detached
homes and two-family dwelling units. The density of development within this
category would typically not exceed 3 structures per buildable acre. Buildable
area is defined as that area of a lot outside the 100-year floodplain' red snow
avalanche areas and slopes less than 40ol".
Development has never occuned on Lots I & 10. Lot 9 contains a single family
dwellin! that was in existance when the Bighorn Subdivision, 2nd Addition was
'
annexed into the Town ol Vail. Over the years, the Bighorn Subdivision, First and
Second Additions have been developed in concert with the Vail Land Use Plan as
residential neighborhoods. The area has been zoned for single-family and two-
family primary/secondary residential development. A majority of the lots in the
neighboring area are also located within geologic hazard zones. Development on
these lots, as with lots 8, 9, & 10, is governed by the adopted Hazard Regulations
in the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations.
3. "To protect and conserve the value of land throughout the Municipality and the
value of buildings and improvements on the land.'
Sts,ff Reqon*:
Staff does not believe that the minor subdivision of Lots 8, 9, & 10, Bighorn
Subdivision, Second Addition would have any negative impacts on the value of
land in the Town ol Vail provided that adequate provisions are made to ensure
that a h*gB portion of the proposed lo$an never be developed for residential use.
4. "To ensure that suMivision of property is in compliance with the Town's zoning
ordinances, to achieve a harmonious, convenient, wo*able relationship among
land uses, consistent with Town development obiectives.'
5.
SfttffReqponse:
As previously discussed, statf has completed a preliminary analysis of the minor
subdivision proposal. Stafi does not support the proposed property line
configuration between Lots I & 9. lt does not meet the goals of Title 13,
Subdivision Regulations which call lor The orderly, efficient and integrated
development of the Town." This orientation is not seen anywhere else in the town
and would not be compatible with future utility requirements. Staff also believes
that the proposal needs to be considered by the PEC in relation to applicable
hazard regulations and guiding land use policies that have been adopted by the
Town of Vail. Staff recommends that the Town of Vail work with the applicant to
achieve the goals and objectives ol the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan.
"To guide public and private policy and action in order to provide adequate and
efficient transponation, water, sewage, schools, parks, playgrounds, recreation,
and other public requirements and facilities and generally to provide that public
facilities will have sufficient capacity to serue the proposed suMivision."
S/Fff nesf,onsp;
The Town of Vail Comprehensive Open Lands Plan identifies a public purpose
and recreational need for Lots 8, '10, and 1'l (Parcel 40), Bighorn Subdivision,
Second Addition. Statf does not believe thal the current proposal addresses this
need nor does it accomplish the goals and interests expressed in this plan.
'To provide for ac:curate legal descriptions of newly suffiivided land and to
establish reasonable and desirable construction design standards and
procedures."
SlaffFeryonse;
Staff does not believe that the current proposal satisfies this purpose statement'
The proposed plat needs to provide more information including, but not limited to,
geologic hazard information and an identification of buildable area.
'To prevent the pollution of air, streams and ponds, to assure adequacy of
drainage facilities, to safeguard the water table and to encourage the wise use
and management of natural resources throughout the Town in order to preseNe
the integrity, stabilv, and beauty of the community and the value of the land-"
Staft Beqon*:
Statf believes that the minor subdivision proposal needs to be further explored
with respect to this purpose stalement.
6.
7.
10
til"
ii
ii
ift ffi[!l rlin
I
il
rtlil
I llil
a
I I
I I
I
I
I lrnil I
I lHHffi]II
I I
I
I
I
:
t
a I
I
I
I rfi
lril
rl a rt
I
| ,,.i llil I iltl
E iltl
! 'iiii
t
I I
I ,il
illilil
t(5 6E
Et:
s:i
I$li
$Hi
$HF
FA
,
I I
I t
I
I
I t
,
t I
!
I
I
I I
I
t I I l
t
t
I I I
a
I
Itt lll itl
ill
I
$
t
ri1$l
ndr
$1r
;;;E
q
h;
0
'ffi|
L
t;
0T000u'0r8 Ivd ll:.cl l00z/zz/s 'InsNos (NrI xYgd zol'r
C!
:I
Er
a
h..>
$Ei
$Er qa
L
h.
Hfr \P
ilflctin't t[!rl llrttt
o o
<=
t\N (DB
\'o9
'/oior/
r.1' '\
F F-S
(r)
s
.9 .t 'lJ
'tf,
I's o (J
q)(/)
g
.o
.g
.:E -o J (')
g L o -s .9 o
o
F{
.O o
o
vt'{-o J
CL o
€
:=U
il
to$
3r?
I
tne P-rilPe Road and
west Lupine Drive area. ^;;'i;;;;;i;;;l nt:-n,Ni:::'::YJ,::i::3ii"!27y!;#!,
Y,Z:: 'r#;i,:,";;:;::;;;;,:;;;;;;l;;i;i";'ii7es7; tn,' recent construction does not appear
on the maq.SCALE: 1'= 100'
ilLt c0PI
TOWT,I OFVAIL
Depfrtmen, of CommwitY DeveloPment
75 South Frcntage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 t 38
FAX 970-479-24s2
www,ci.vail.co.us
June 14, 2001
Steve Riden
P.O. Box 3238
Vail. CO 81658
Re:Minorsubdivisionoflnas'9and10'Bighomfldditton
Dear Steve:
I have performed a preliminary review of the proposed plat to resubdivide Lots 8, 9. and l0' Bighorn 2""
Addition. There are
" "##rt"'t";;;;i#firffi;ffil
on the plat before it can be approved:
t;^"41,":{.?"needs
to be conected to read "A RESUBDIVISI0N oF Lors 8' 9 AFID 10"
, No. 5 under..General Notes"needs to be conected to read' "The sole purpose of this plat is to
change the conftguration ofLots 8' 9 and 10'"
. The certificate of Dedication and ownership needs to be reviscd so that only the owners and
. ff*fr:'f"iL:"JfJ.HlJ,1T'?l"lll ""0
address from the Land use Summary; revise the rotar to
. ttTJ-*::l ffi?*t of the certificate of Dedication and ownership also needs to be revised to refcr
to Lots 8, 9 and 10 i*;;;;i'; 8 thru l2'- "conaining I'564 Acres more or less'
. Remove the (3) owner blocks for Lot I I (Weiss)
I Remove the Town Council Certificate
r Remove the Zoning Adminisuator Certificate
!*{("{,"^rlots E, 9 and r0 on the proposed prat with Lupine Drive, Lot l l, Lot 7, and USFS as
. ?T3tff#:t#'a"ge for rots in the ps zone district is 30 ft A[ of the proposed lots meet this
. ilffiilJiuil:T*"" *e also required to be able to enclose a square measuring 80 ft bv 80 ft.
nii oitftt ptoeosed lots meet this minimum requirement'
r The minimum rot ,i"iiTii, fr*^n" Gnitt tt';i1to ;i' The proposed configurations of Lots 8' 9
and l0 cunently meet this minimum requirement'
{g r""ouor^rt*
. The minimum buildable area in the PS zone disfict is 15,000 sf, Buildable area does not include any
red hazard avalanche areas, areas in excess of40% slope, or floodplain. The buildable area for each
lot is reguired to be indicated on the plat. Any areas in excess of40% slope or red hazard avalanche
areas are required to be demarcated on the plat. Due to the requirement of 15,000 sf of buildable
area, the proposed lot confrgurations may not comply with PS zoning. You nny wish to revise the lot
configurations so that therels a minimum of I 5,000 sf of buildable area for each proposed lot. Staff
would not recommend approval to the Planning and Environmental Commission if any of the lots did
not meet the minimum requirements for lot size, dimensions, or buildable area.r Staffrecommends that the easternmost property line of Lot E be reconfigured so tbat it is more of a
"straight shot'' rather than having a 90 degree angle. Staffwill not support the current configuration.
(hh e r o uttutding is su es t Please submit a stamped topognphic survey for Lor 8, 9, and 10. This survey murit include the
location of he65, easements, encroachments, environmental hazards, slopes gfeater than 40%, and
buildable area (which excludes red hazard avalanche area, areas in excess of40% slope, and
floodplain) for each lot to be resubdivided.. Please provide written notification once the easement shared by Los 8 thru I I has been vacated-
. Submira copy ofthe receipt indicating that property taxes have been paid for 2000 for each lot.
. Submit 8.5"x1l" reductions ofthe survey(s) and proposed plat.
Please address these issues and submit revised plans and plan reductions to the Community Developmcnt
D4arnnent by noon on Thursday, June 21, 2001. Whatever information is received by this time will be
forwarded to the Planning and Environmental Commission members and will be discussed at their
meeting on June 25,200I. If you would like a copy of the staffmemorandunr, please let me know and I
can forward it to you prior to the meeting. Ifyou have any other questions or concenu, you can reach me
at 4'l 9-2148 or akierulf(a)ci.vail.co.us.
Sincerely,
QL'A@Q
Ann Kjerulf \ \
Planner IVCIS SpecialisN
Town of Vail
Erglc Courtty - Arseseor Drtabrrc ' Disptry o htF/lwww.ergle-countyyRec.cfm?acounNo=R032fi&recligtPtr=2
Asseesor Propefi Detail
Account No: R03,Z7T|
District SGl08
Parcel Nb: 210lltt0l017
Owner NamelAddrces
LUPINE PARTNERSHIP
330719TH AVE
KEARNEY. NE,68845
Sltus Addtess
Stlrol No.
003827
Dir No#
StreGt Nam€
LUPINE
Sufrix
DR
Condo Namo
Condo Unit
Subdlviaion
Namc
BIGHORN 2ND ADDITION
^ -1,Blod(
L.nd Adual
330,000
lelul Ass€tsod
30,190
lmprv A.lu8l
582,350
lmp'v Asts!$d
53,290
Salee
':< MS.0g
leg i.r {iov g!111tgntl-41}i5,itl-{ oiUg"*ill
l$p-laf r:.u::ll'Rt*lur:i-tr-Ti*r!c.gl.!;rlucn.ttl
l::rlLa-r rr "" +-' ".:'-:-:--:1-r.j:
i{,iq-is-\-Etienillcbt;ale$:&t!)-o-X-.{-r-on1!ilx'ij
Book Pag.Rcccptlon*
R706318
Ooc Fec
89.10
Sabs D.tc
08/17199
Selc Ptict
891,000
Sibling Account Numb€r
WD
email cagle coung: gli!rg:rgh:t:r:*iii:.i:::'-t
Copyright @1998 Eagle CountY
I of 1
6111019:6 t
Easre countv' AssessorDahbase -DisPrav tnaa :U,--H3ffiefi"gfftZliilf,**=r
AccountNo: R01t810
District SCl08
Subdivision
Parcel Nb: 2t0lll102001
Assessor ProPertY Detail
Land Actual
550,000
Lend Ass66sod
159,500
lmprv Actuel lmorv Assessod
Book Pago Receptionf
R692042
Doc Fee
50.00
Sales Oate
03/31/99
Sal6 Pri6
500,000
Sibling Account Number
WD
*,iienu
Situs Address
Slreet No.
003847
Dir No#
Streot Name
LUPINE
Suffx
DR
Condo Name
Condo Unit
Name
BIGHORN lSTADDITION
Block Lot
1 7
email eagle county: tl:11':ir.r-.{;iigl !:.::'-i :ill:.r"-{1'.Jl.l
CopYright @1998 Eagle C-ountY
6141019:05
Fagle Cornry - Assessor Daubax - Display
t
htrp:/Arww.cagle'ouoty.co6/Es8€s8or/di"'yRec'cfn?rccountno=Kljjl '
/56gt0cr-|!1r tr=r t
Assessor ProPertY Detall
Account No: R03278
District' SCt08
Parcel Nb: 2l0l11t0t0l8
6'rnar llarnclAddrecc ValUgg
LNnd Adual
220,000
Land Ats.3!ed
20,130
lmpJv Ac{u8l
412,530
lmpN As36E!€d
37,750
Sales
Book I Page I necePtion* | Doc Fcc
Sal$ Date I Sale Prics
Subdlvislon
NamB
BIGHORN 2ND ADDITION
Blod(^-t
Menu )>
Owner Ngme/Mdrtss
Sltus Addregs
Slroct No.
003827
Dir No#
Sirqol Name
LUPINE
Sufilx
DR
Condo Namo
Condo Unit
cmail eagle county: sldlrir$rtillji:lf uur:(:('ill
Copyright @199P Eaglc CountY
1of 1
6/4/01 9:08
Eagtc Coudty rAssessor Databasc - Display
t
hnp:/Avww'oaglo-co* -tT'*"yRec'cfm?accouaNo=R0
1 l5tlo&recusrru= r
Assessor ProPertY Detail
AccountNo: R011540
Distris[ SC108
Parcel Nb: 2101lll0l005
Owner NamelAddlgqg
LANGEGGER, HANNA
3807 LUP]NE DR
vAlL, co, 81657
Sltus Addreos
Subdivision
Lard Actu.l
550,000
lend As3clsod
50,320
lmpru A.lual
378,270
lmpw As!€33€d
34,610
Salet
goor lPage lRecePtto* 1ry9l99
Saler Dat€ | Sale Pdce
Menu
Str6€t No.
003807
Oir No#
Strc€t Name
LUPINE
Suffix
DR
Condo Nemc
Condo Unit
Namo
BIGHORN 2NDADDITION
Blod(Lot
3
cmail eagle county: xi'"tl-iir''il&S:t-t-Ql!!:"r']1'!9!i!
CopYrigbt @1998 Eagle CountY
d4rol 9:10.
Ea$c Cotrnty - Asscssor Darabase - DisplEy |l http://w*v.cagle-county.conTor/ ,..yRec,cfn?accountNo=M115?0&recListPlr-
Assessor ProPefi Detail
AccountNo: R0f1570
Disrict Scl08
Parcel Nb: 2{0111t01002
Owner NamelAddrcra Valueg
MORAN, CHLOE HELD
1480 BOHNS POINT RD
WAYZATA, MN,55391
Sltus
Slncl No.
003797
Dir
E
Nd
Slr!.t Narn€
LUPINE
Sufllx
DR
Condo Name
Condo Unil
Subdlvlsion
Nam€
BIGHORN 2NDADDITION
Elocl Lot
4
[.nd Actual
550,000
lrnd A!3cg3ed
50,320
lmpw Adual
901,780
lmp As8r83t(l
82,510
Sales
wa-u.
i"S rr-.g-<;gb:il!ttei-i-!-'13 :ie-s:,1-!'lutuitli I j
11-;1ii9-{lir-tg1g'--R-.j,$u[--cstTll:iq-o-i-(]p::.t9-l-t1,].1
[-irt t,n -ri-tol !-&-S!$g!-ta]t-9.ril-Codittili
iUr:. t rL --trj,ir:liuS,'-&r lg$rlgli -l-rd:L: r;i -Lnr"t I r:,r"*ii
Book
oar9
Page
0931
R.c.ption*ooc Fc€
63.75
Salos Oate
09/01/94
Sale Ptica
637.500
Sibling Account Numb.r
WD
email eagle cor.rnty: r!!:.ll,rirc;rg-l!::9.)l$!r).:.',( lm
Copyright @199E Eagle CountY
614019:07
Esgle Cgunty - Asscssor Database - Display
Assessor Propefi Detail
bttp:/lrww.cagle-counv cory ...yRoc.cfia?accounrNo.R0il380&rcclisrptr
Account No: R011380
District SC108
Parcel Nb: 210111101010
Owner Name/Addrecs
WEISS, GARY
1051 PORT MALABAR 6
PALM BAY, FL,32905
Sltus Addross
Streot No.
003834
Dir No#
StrEot Namc
BRIDGE
Sutrx
RD
Condo Name
Condo Unil
f ig tl (krvcnrnrrxt l'ablr ol Contcnl{
{{,i o *to. []unty lle':rturggs_f irb"L+_lrj.-Lllrrr{ g[!:l
l{-io to h" eu's rt Sun c_t,s I'ahle o1'Corrtrill^sl
Velues
Lrnd Ac'tuel
104,500
Land fus€3sod
30,310
|mptv Actual lmpwA$€33cd
Sales
Boo*Pago Receplion*
R753468
DoG Fro
7.50
Sabs Datc
o3t28t0'l
Sab Pdc.
75,000
Sibling Account Numbor
WD
Subdlvleion
Nlme
BIGHORN 2NDADDITION
Blod(Lot
11
cmeil sggls courty: $:!glii,iaqir!:i::i:i!.U],,1l-lrir
Copydght 01998 Eagle Oounty
I of I 6/4fi1 10:55 AIt
,"10" **: - Assessor Databas€ - Display
Assessor Property Detail
Valuec
Lar,rd Adual
440,000
tard Alsg3sed
40,260
lmp'v Adual
E52,670
lmpry Assg3sed
78,O20
| { i,.r irr 6rtt'-cr Lr!tilrl*[41tilj-.Cir11t{-t,:1'J
li,ilr--il: lj*lrr"lry-Rg,:e"s-r"!.ti -lr-bLc"0j-(s*i t qrL!':'l
t!.ir x; Ncrvs & Surr,':Js'frhli: of (.irrna:rrtsj
{-Qs.t s-,v-.i-! i t :,:r:r' -npl$r*s{r.l-abls-gj-{'i:-*tii'tt"'J
http:/www,eaglc€* *ry i."yR*.ctur?accountNo=Rorl5l0l9reclistPtr'
Account No: R0ll510
Distsict SCl08
ParcefNb: 210111101012
Owner NamdAddrssg
Subdivislon
Name
BIGHORN 2NDADDITION
Block llot -113
Situs Addresr
Stnot No.
003846
Dit No#
Slrg€t Namc
LUPINE
Suffix
DR
Condo Namc
Condo Unit
Sales
Book P.9e Rec6ptior|l
R672418
Doc Fcc
137.24
SahE Dab
08/04/98
Selr Pdc6
1,372,400
SlblirE Account Numbcr
WD
email eagle county:,:lA j]jilgrgJs::*.!ilL'J:!lr.:$!
Copyrigbt O1998 Eagle County
tofI 614019:13 t
http://www.caglo-courtY F,aglc County - Asscssor Databasc - Display t
Sales
Assessor Property Detail
Account No: R0tl035
District SCt08
Parcel Nb: 210111101006
Subdivision
Namo
BIGHORN 2NDADDITION
Blod( J Lol
7
i{ii,*ts"}-isiis:r$ril$-tjrtst:"-Talti,eo"l""L:.ri4li:rttrj
yRcc.cf m?accounNo=R01 1035&recl.istP!=1
Valueg
Lend Aftd
550,000
Land Aisesrcd
50,320
lmpfl Actual
256,970
lmpw Ass63s€d
23.510
Situs Address
Stro€t No.
003796
Dir No#
Slr€€t Nam€
LUPINE
Sufnx
DR
condo Nams
Condo Unit
Book Pags Rec6ption#
R720731
Doc Fe€
59.90
Sel6s Date
01114100
Sal6 Price
599,000
Sibllng Account Numbei
WD
email eaglc county: *,fti!rig$ls*:rcl-rii:.r.!tl
Copyright @1998 Eagle CountY
I of 1
6/4[1 9:11 A
Q," rrEM MAy AFFE.T youR pRoT"
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the
TownofVail onJune25,2001,al2:OOP.M.intheTownofVail Municipal Building. In
consideration of:
A request for a major amendment to Special Development District #6, to allow for the
conversion of 2 residential units into 1 , located at 100 E. Meadow Drive, Units 335 & 337/Lot O.
Block 5D, Vail Village 1't Filing.
Applicanl: Patricia & Gerardo Schroeder, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects Planner: Brent Wilson
A request for a worksession to discuss allowing ski storage as a permitted or conditional use on
the first floor of a building in Lionshead Mixed Use 1 & Lionshead Mixed Use 2 Zone District.
Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs
A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-6 (Setbacks), Vail Town Code, to allow for the
construction of a garage within the required front setback, located at 1956 Gore Creek Drive /
Lot 45, Vail Village West Filing #2.
Applicant: David Inrvin Planner: Ann Kjerulf
A request for a final review to discuss amending certain residential zone districts in the Town
of Vail to allow home day care facilities subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit and a
home occupation permit.
Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: George Ruther
A request.for a worksession lo discuss a minor subdivision proposal, located at 3834 & 3838
Bridge Road/ Lots 11 & 12, Bighorn Subdivision 2nd Addition.
Applicant: Steve Riden Planner: Ann Kjerulf
A request for a worksession lo discuss a minor subdivision proposal, localed at 3816, 3826, and
3828 Bridge Road/ Lots 8, 9, & 10, Bighom Subdivision 2no Addition.
4. iHiTr*Steve Riden
Ann Kjerulf
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours in the project planne/s office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development
Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site
visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. ' 5)
Please call 479-2138 for information. nj.!',[rf ease cat +t J-z r.ro ror Inrormauon.
, "!q:"0 Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notlfication. Please call V\1J f .f
479-2356, Tetephone forthe Hearing lmpaired, for information 7fr*\Ufl\'/\\\ r\r\ -\Community Development Department
Published June 8. 2001 in the Vail Trail.
T'rN 0Fvut
Qucsrions? Call thc planning Staffar 479-213g
Of
","nrroN FoR pr,ANNrNG iltnur*oNM ENTAL
I Amcndrncnt to an Approvcd Dcvclopmcnt plan g Employeo Housing Unit (Typc: )tr Major or tr Minor CCI Extcrior Alteration
(VailVillage)tr Major or tr Minor CCII Extcrior Altcration
TOWN OFVAIL
COMMISSION APPROVAL
CENEMI.INFORMATION
This application is for any projcct rcquiring approval by thc Planning and Environmcntal Comrnission. For spccific information. scc thc submittal rcquiremcnts. foi thc particutar upprou-ol thatis ;;;;stcd. Thc application can not bc accepted until all rcquired information is submittcd. Thc project rnay atso ncca tl uc rcvicwcd by thc Town council and/or thc Dcsign Rcvicw Board.
A: ryPEOFAPPLICATION:
. tr Additionat GRFA (250)tr Bcd and Brealdast tr Conditional Usc permit
tr Major or pMinorSubdivision
tr Rezoning'
tr Sign Variancc tr Variancc tr ZoningCodeAmcndmcnt
B.DESCRIPTION OF THE REQTJEST:
n
tr
(Lionshcad)
Spccial Dcvclopmcnt Dishict
Major or E Minor Amcndmcnt to an SDD
LocArroN oFpRoposAt-: rcrfuAlJfi_ocK_r,r,*o ?,r@ 'c.
ADDRESS:
ZONING:
BUILDINC NAME:
Ezrez Jtrtr€Ae4j
VAt
PHON
D.
E.NAME oF o*'Iff=f to'l lllot
MAILINGADDRESS:
J r-rtt i-
Ji. F -"
F.
G.
OWNER(S)SIGNA
NAME OF REPRESENTA
MAILINCADDRESS:
c'u I
tir-,r€u
19
PHONE:
H, FEE - SEE THE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPROPRIATE FEE.
STJBMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SI,BMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE To THE DEPARTMENT oF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, z5 sourH FRONTAGE ROAD,VAIL, COLORADO 8l6s?.
'(r,>J (-/
e0 pE
FccPaid:- cw:_fui_sv:
Rcvi.rd 6/96
fo
+*++'l'l *'l'f *'! l.'|':l'|t:l'|' 't * '|:|l{r {r,}:} ** ** +**'l*+* ++* i******* * ** ** *** *****,t* * *** + *** **'}* + * *+ +** * ++ l**+*+'t't
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement
*****'t* *** *i ** *+ ++++ * {r******t '} 't 't'} {.,}*'}*1.1.** * *'}* *{r '1,}* *****f +**+++* {t't't't'}**'* '} {.*'l:t*{.*,}'l'l*{r'l* *,},} 'l'}
Statement Number: R000000908 Amount: $250.00 05/07/20O1LL:08 AM
Palment liiethod: Check Init : iIAR
Notation: 5788
Permit No: P8C010043 T]4)e: PEC - Minor Subdivieion
Parcel No: 210111101008
Site Addregs: 3815 LUPINB DR I/AIL
Location: Irots 8, 9, 10
Total Fees: $250.00
Thia Payment: 9250.00 Total AL,L Prnte: $250.00
Balanee: $0 .00
** * * * * * * +*+ *'t * * ** * * *'1. * * * * ** ** ** * ** * * * ** ** t* * *+ * * ** * * * ** ** 'lr**'t* rl. * ** *'** * * * * 'l * * * * *+* *tf *'f *+ * + + 't *
ACCOTJNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Descriotion Current Pmts
PV OO1OOOO31125OO PEC APPLICATION FEES 250. 00
'trl**tt'tf *'itttt**+**+**ttrr**+,t*
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO
Statement Number: ROO0OO0908 Anorlnt: $250.00 06/07/2OO|JlL:08 AII Payment Uethod: Check
Thie Payment:
Init: JAR
Notation:
Permit Ho: PEC010O43 Tlpe: pBC - Illinor Subdivieion Parcel No! 210111101008 Site Addrees: 3916 IJUpItfE DR VAUr Location: Lots g, 9, 10
$2s0.00
Total Feeg:
Total AIJJ lrmts :
788
$2s0.
s250.
0
0
0 ++**tr'r***{r*r'}*r++,r*!i*r*******f,,r**r*+********r**,}{,*,r*****.*******"i*t"Xlli****.*******il*
ACCOTJNT ITEMLIST:
Account Code Descri pti on Current Prnts
PV 00100003112500 PEC APPLICATIOI{ FEES 250.00
vq/ via/ auu1
HAY-zr -Ot r1 ^t,.tat I'.lA (,lv:tlvvvJ.v
. 6r F'lott."tltttE GUAFANTEE rD.In?6463r FACE Z/9
hnd fitlc Guenn@ Grqrny
cusTolts olsliltuTEr
k 093t.?00r
hqrgA&rc:
tuffirNrEbcl VC2?23'?&l
rrTst nrRoucc 12, Bt@onN suBDrvliloN, sE@]rDAI]DmoN
!
F AIA}{DSI'TVEVING \.
Aa reE{TBI(riS
hot 9?So?ltt6g
Atz 97O464i15
S?ar \ah ltr
tGli.l|lry
ut,/ vra/ 3vvl, Irr, lru fa.a
xAY-2r-Or !1.E2 FROH,
rl,./t$
GUANAl|TEE tD'f|*e{Ee.u!1'"=
rgl vt
Lrnd fitle Guanntee Gornpeny
YotfRc0rrrgrs
DrE Ot21-2001
hoprtyAdrlrs:
tuOdrNunDc vgrglt-l
rors r Tm,ou@r la $G[loRN sutDrvl:Ior.l. sEcoND ADDmoir
Sqycz3qtu,rrr:
10EEDETERMD.IED
9=trcr/O*ler:
ruNE ELI?TRE:IIJ llAAER, AS TO I,OT 8,
HUMIIIbICiEIRD @MFAIVIr. A COI'NADO SOLE FEOFRIETORS@, AS TO I,OII' 9 AI{D TO,
GA&Y WETSS, AS TO I.OT II AND
MARY C.B. WE SS TRUSTEE A}ID CABY M. WEISS, Rt'SfES. IHE ldANY C3 TGISS TAUSI
Uyou brrc rny bqirl.| c.trqdr!ffi.'adfrnc, de eorE c dtr -rl|rr' b&rt
Fa Chdljidlrrc ForTldcrlfrar
Vril Ttdc Dqlt.
fE oliggt
IOE S. FRONTACE ND. W.
'AB P.O. BOxst
VAIL, CO 3165'g!E.,no4?6z5l
Frr: fto476;aX|t}
EDlriL tliggrQlryc.m,
Nrd r o4r c irrdqF forlu_ Tlo.1 _4lg oh*"gf Ch.dr or!' ltld Ilitlr'r rrrb ft a rrr.\p.m ItrEr E|IlGorwttof :rE:lF GGaiE D rlr of o|E.ilsG rtt
EsilTTEOFTIII.EFEEI
lcbnldoBbC.t glt 0.oo
rof t tz50.oo
i.an Cqlrgl !ar!BtEttFutotL@r
vur \r:i, -vv.L L.r. \r{,
FAy-Zl-Ol r1:s2 FRor{tbrr"LE r !.,tr\
CUANAXSEE rD'UU'€{s3.
Ctisrto Tlib lurqr Coq-'y
ALTA COM}IITMBN T
S.tTEl3A
tu&drf,o. vGnEnlr
Ctd.,8:3,:
RoprrtyAdtLr*
I.OTS 8 TIiROUCH 12. BIGIIORN SUBDTVISION, SG@ND ADDTIION
l- Elldrelrl.. Apdf3o,z(Fl!'dxtp-tt,
2. hUcJ tD bG Isr4 rd I,!oFq! f!s!!$:
bfmdo,Eie
hopocd Inucd:
TOAEDETEBMIND
gl.o
J. Tb.!3.tc or hlltr* ar |b lrril d:ss&rd or rtfutri o b tis Cooffi d qrrrd h613
AFEESIMPIJ
{- tH. b r}+.!|.r'oriDB cstsralarhS |rrncrflltirrd&hcdvrrtd h
SEEATTACBED
5. ltc brd rtJscd io ii t*L CctbEa & drrilql I lo[ors
LOTS E, 9, ro, lt AND 12, BIGI{OnN $rSDIYlstoN, sEco!{D ADDtTloN, ACCORDNG m THE
RECOTDED FL.f,T THENEOF. COT'NTY OF EAOIJ, STATE OF COII)BADO.
xAf-2r-gl 11 . s2 Fn '""'t5'rLE cuAFANts!
rlJ uo
PAGE 6/rs rD.lu"64s34
OE(ld-lfG V(2?5l8,,l
{'. Tltlt to ti. €.t3 or Lru, ctwrri b'fr -l3 I frc dlrfiu trr hrd d b
JUNEPT T'AFETA FR^2]ER' A3 It}LOT E,
\ lluuMrN@ItD COMPANY, A @t6nAm sOlE FROpRtEIOnsHp. AS 6 t.OtB I AI{D lO,\QIRY WEISS. AS TO !.of II AND
-- M.CAY C.B. WEITS TR,USTEE AND GAAY M. WEISS, I'RUSTEE TTIE MAR,Y C.& W4S ITUSr DA,TEDr,tZZtgT, ds Ye Lot ,t ,
wv/ viai' aev.t rv. !ri, rra.t tir, vir. vvvtv
FAY-zr-6r r r i s2 Froxlfilrr?LE
--
'o'u5'"'"'"CUAFATITEA PAGT E/9
AL?A COMMTTMENT
Schc&leB. S.ds I
Fl{|&rEr) (tr(Iu!ao. vwrg,E,l
TLtiltorbi .|r tc rqeus to br oDlid rilt:
lca e) no/et to c fu ib t6|Et of &c grcora o or(geg('ti of ttcirll ffiainfuftt r.Gq'
iunres p be iuutd.
Ito (u) hopcr irEdrt|rlED(o) scrirS ltc c#c c istslr to ba i!q$d r$ bo crFxa{ tC &ily rr-r 6n r*,4 ewt:
Itea (c) furonrof dl urrr, iirl!* ot rc tnial aa rslrrd adu( tb EDirrl Fair* $irits:r tb:od payeDta-
ItE (d) Addidor{ nqulm" if rqy dilcrc.rt trlory:
TSIS COMMIIMENT III FORINFIO8,MATION ONLY, ANP NO POIJETN/ILL BE ISITUED
PUISUAI\IT IIEREIO.
xlY-Zr-9t ll 'S2 F|lOlr,L ND TITLE oO
{ D!11\
GUAIAHTEE rD'U5"3'F3{qJv t
PAGE 7/9
ALTA COTI{MITUENT
SchcdllaB- Sdim2
Crc.ged Osqri.rNo. VC2?237t.1
Th Ftst er polh&r b !c tmrd rrll cmhie trrtrri.rre tLtolhitt|G|| tbncn dipd
of b lbc adrfictim d ft Cooqy:
l- Ri3b c d&r of grctic il pccio mt r[fla ty Ur Fblic Fco,!Ct,
2. Erscnan, cr dai8 of carmg, mr Sowa by rba pubtic reds
3. Ditgea.n!, aatriar b boortuy tiucr, itgolc b rc., affi.trD.qE. d q), nco qA!&. mr., ttrrilt d in+rcds of rte FE r"a {6ur6 #.cl^rc ald urhic[ n aor sonu by 6c pnbl. 'n;dr a. Ary li.!, ot tith b I lia, 0or ecnria, bDs or arnrlrt rblrofon or lec.Srr fsd-.d. iry3;cd tt lrv d
not Sounby 6r lablb r@rds.
5- Dfu' li4s rocu'nltr"'tr, rdvl:c clabr q oricr Dfiltr if aly, etd, frrt qEladry h rb grblic rcordr or adilt l|bqe*t to rh. cdhairn d+ L:cof hr Fior to tr drtc u eroeorliislO-rqldtrr'orcul t vdue lhe cso!. or irnEtGrt q EoIltfga tbrca covepd bJt rfrir Comirmr -
6. Thsc or {rcial rrcqorcts vbicb.rc lol stoqa rs *inb3 liros oy rbo p6tb tpdr,e ib Trrrsrr'r ofice.
7. I irr fq q1i6 urG to.r ir€ clalje, il ty, _
8. b addttoa, rtc oc/ldr policy vi[ hc srbjcg ro tbc EdrtrtB if rry. aouf in Sdi[ I of Sril?,F.rc B btllrrf.
9. ruCITT OF PROTRIBft)N, OF A YMrr OR LoDE !o E CIRAGT AIIID REMovE TIB oR.B IITBEFROM SEOI'LD TIIE SAME BE FOU}TD TO PE{EITAIE OR TNTETSST THB Fn.BMISES
AS REIERVED IN TJNNED STATES PATENT RECOTDED APR,IL 28, T9O, I!{ B€T 4t AT
PAGE47/.
IO, R,IG|I? OF WAY F()R DTTCS€S OR CANAI,S @}ISTRUCT@ IY IT|E At'fHORrTr OF ITIE
TJ}TITED STJiTEI' AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT NEOORDED AIRT.zT. 19(p.
IN EOOK.lt AT PACIE,l7l-
I l. tEsrrurcTlvE cpvENAl{Ts q/}ltcll Do l{oT OorvrAIN a FOnlGln RE Or. rE.,trtERTSE Cr,l[Us6.BUt OMrrrrNg ANy co\rENA{T oRrE$RrcrroN EAttED OI{ nrCE, cCI-On- TEUGI([{.Sx, HANDICAP, FAItiq.IAL STATUS OR NAllONrr,L ORIGM UNITST AI{D ONLY fO nC
E ffENT TtlAT &rlD CO\rENA!{T (A) ISEXEMPT t NDEn.GIAfTEI, 02, SECTTQIN WI O8
TIIE UNITED STATES @DE ON. G) RHA'IES T9 IIANDTCEPBUT DOES NOT
DTSCRJMTNATE AGNNST IIANDTCAP PENSONS, AS C\)NTAINED N DISI3'I'MENI&rcO*DED
DECEMEER, a), 1962. IN BOOK T?4 AT PAOD {q' AIrTD
^S
AUEX{DID IN O{SIAUTGNT
RICORDID ssrrelvsER 19. 1963. IN EOOK l?5 AT PAGE Fr-
12. A IEN PEBCCNT NON-PARTTCIPATING BOYALTY IN AIiID TO TIIE PNOCEEDS DBII'ED FROM TfE SAIB oF MINERTES. BIC, PRODUCED AIitD [,n\tlD tloM SAD lREf,gSES, rtII iS
SET PORTTI AI{D RESERVED EtI NSTRUMEI'T RE@RDED D{ BooK 166 AT PA@.IO?.
rAY-2 I -et I I cuaraxrEE' '^ **, il',ir""4"r48e.l-
-U
rgt UO
FAGE A"
ALTA COMMITT{ENT
Scletblcl, $cb 2
Gerdc)Ocorklb, Yqr4trft,t
Tb p&y or pofhb b bcis! rtt|.oGt-ir @Gt b D tb to0rn4uloteactr.1r
of, to tb.el&{etrfr- of,fi Copry:
13. E^SEMENTS. NESERVAIIONS r}ID rA$Rrcltors AS SHOW}{ OR NASR\IE OI{ TIIE
RECPI.DED PI.AT oF EIGHoRN sil,JBDTvIsToN, $E@ND ADDITpN,
t4. T8nMs. coNDingN3 alqp ERovtsroNs oF Noflcf oF EI{CUMIR,rNCA Al{D }B(Q{ lrnoN nEooRDED ApRrL n, Ml ATR.FCEPnON NO. 75t5r.
- a /b{a 15. DEED OF
'RUSI
DATED FB8R,UARY O{. I99t FROM
'UNE
ELTTAIETTT FIJ|AEN TO €
PUBLIC IRUSTE OF E^GTT SI'NTY FOR Tr{E tl$g 6P q'E$rCr.X,EAIfi IO sucufE flE SUM OF $Al2'tff,oo. A.hID A![Y OTHEN AT{OI'NTS PAYABIJ UNDER T|IE TERMS THEBEOF,
R,ECORDED FttsRuAny 13, r99q UNDB nE@TroN No. 6az!4?.
(ArrEcTslorB)
16. DEED OF ttUST DATED MARCIT 0l'. IgY' FROM JI.'NE E IZ^EEfT|
''iAG. TO THE PUIIrc RT'SIEE OF EAqI COTJNTY FON, TIIE USEOP WTIIA}{ r. OGG. IIDtr-S.
BINGE rr,tvD ROSIAM. BlNCEto gEg1;RETtlE SUM (p.txr5,m'..', AHDAttYOfiR
, AIiOI'NTS PAYTBI! UNDEI 188 TENMS TIJEREOF. REOOIDD MARCE r?- r9Y'. IN SfiX(' ZIO AT PAGE 3OT.
u(4 I-S^t*C.tq. rN Assrcr.ruENT EEO9nDAm B@I('3I ATPAcE gEl.
SAID ASSICNMBT.IT CO!{VEYS ONLY THE UNDIVTDED FIFTY PERCB{T INTERE$T IELD EY WITIJAM W. OGG n{ fiIE AEOVE DEED OF TNUST.
t7.
'. SAID DEE OFTRUSTXIAS ASSTGDIE TO qrcon!_Ei.lloEltlulE-
OF t'6.25O.@. .|l{D A.NTT OTSER AMOUIITS PAYAEII UI{DN TgS TEnXS llErEOr,
RECORDED ATRIL (B, ?@I, I'!{DEN RECDPNON NO.''l'3/6'..
(AFFECTS l.of 1T)
(IFFECTSLCTTO , - tl
,zbof"J 4-8l*(4
DEED OFTRUSTDATEO }IARCE 8,2fp'! FROM C^rYWg6 fi, TltEPUEIjCTSUSTE€OF
EA@E COUNTY FOR, TEE USE OF YIASilN('IC{ I.UTUALBAIS, fA To SESUIE TE St,'[d
vv/ v.r/ 4vvL lo, ott f nl|'rrrl-21-el I l :53 FROI .r.,/gto TITLE GuApAxrrn
Es
-rt
LAlru LUlltlL tD'f,1€{s3'14(r9
Froa 9/e
ALTA COMMIT}IENT
SchrfuleE- Scaioaz
Fcrnl k(k!b, vclTz'7t"l
il fgtey r -ecXc b bc Fa rfll rDltrh rl.rldoE to fb ldbrlg lrh - 163 rrr etlrrd
of !o tb *ril|cfbn oitb Crupry;
rt. DEED oF r*Usr DArrD r{ABcE os. dr Fno}r c^ny r,*. - #1L*
F& *<
EAGLE couNTY F(IR TUE usE oFFnsf, wBslEltit x*rGr@ sRlrr,stc, lo -- --
sEctrRE TrE stIM op t900.60-m, Ar.tD Artrv orrlR, Ardour{fts pAyAEla ulros, rre IBMS TI&SOF' nEcoRDED IUARCH 16, 2001, uxwn, nrcerrirx fo. zsrgse-
SAID DEED OF1?USTWAS ASSIGNDII) ABI.' AMRO MORrcAGEE,OUP, INC. IN ASSIG}iN''ENT TE@RDED MARCTI 16, 2'I'I! TJNDR, REBFTIOIr I{O. 75t5i-
(AFlDClt'rrr t2)
FAX 949-0304 4 '(9701949-4r2r
Re:
June 4, ZX)1
Department of Community Development
Town of Vail
75 Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Fraziet lDahl, 3826 Lupine Road
l,ot 8, lrt 9 and Lot 10, Bighorn 2nd Addition
Dear Members of the Planning and Environmental Commission
Ilt line relocation between Lot 8 and lot 9 is to facilitate an expansion to the existing
Frazier Residence, she owns both Lot 8 and Lot 9.
I-ot line relocation between Lot 8 and Lot 10 is to allow Int 10 to become conforrning
to the primary / secondary zone district.
t,J-V'.l,l"Jti l,reilgl
vAIL, co.81658
Steven James Riden. Architect
. MEMBER OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS'
a
RoCKFALLANDAVALANCHEHAZARDANALYS|SAND
MITIGATION CONCEPTS
Lors 8, 10, AND 12, BIGHoRN suBDlvlsloN zND ADDlrloN
Prepared For
Mr. Steve Riden
PrePared BY
Arthur l. Mears, P.E., lnc'
Gunnison, Colorado
MaY,2001
ARTHUR I. MEARS, P.E., INC.
Natural Hazards Consultants
555 county Road 16
Gunnison, Colorado 81230
Te'/ftx:.970-641-3236
artmcars@rmii'com
May 10,2001
Mr. Steve Riden
P.O. Box 3238
Vail, CO 81658
RE:Hazardandmitigationanalysis,Lots8,lOandl2'Bighorn2noAddition
Dear Mr. Riden:
The analysis of hazard and mitigation design concepts you requested is
attached. Although *or" r*poJure to the lbovedefined hazards does exist,
ilte-speciRc mitig;tion,'i;duding ntt against back walls or special fences' is
f;',fi; anO cariprobably be incorporated without substantial expense'
Please contact me if you have any questions'
SincerelY,
n-\ | ? 11 . rr vvlt4vuww
Arthur l. Mears, P.E.
Avalanche-control engineer
Encl: RePort
Mass Wasting . Avala ^chcs ' Avalanche Contml Etgincering
1 REPORTSUMMARY
The principal conclusions, recommendations and limitations of this study are
detailed in Sections 2 - 6. The summary is as follows.
1.1 Exoosure
All lots, proposed buildings and additions considered in this study are within
range oi roiffatl and avaianche hazards. These hazards originate within or
Oirectty below the obvious limestone cliff outcropping of the Maroon formation
approiimately 300 feet above the building sites (Figures 2 and 3). Both rocffall
and avalanches of sizes sufficiently large to damage buildings are rare events
(estimated return periods of 100 years or longer) but do require mitigation as
discussed.
&'i'rti
RECOMMENDED MITIGATION - Mitigation recommended torthe building postlions shown in the
nirit, ZOO| Sfeye Rrden drawngs conCrsfs of placing a f,il b a height H against all back walls of
proposeA nouses. |he fitl shou-ld extend vefticatly for a height'H". H = 10' on Lot I (upper), 8'
'on'Lot 8 (lower), 10' on Lot 10, and 8' on Lot 12. Surtace slope of fill shotlld .le 1.% : 1. This will
iriea iom a6tign-magnituait roc!<fat! and avalanches. An altemate mitigation (a rockfall
energy-absorbing fence) is discussed in Section 6.
1.2 Mitigation
Because of small velocities and energies of avalanches and rockfall, the
recommended mitigation will consist of fill against the uphill walls of all buildings
as shown in the above figure. The lower section of the walls must be reinforced
for the resulting soil preslure, as determined by the structural engineer. Any
walls and windows on the back walls within 12 feet of grade^should be minimized
in area and reinforced for a horizontal pressure of 100 lbs/ft'. The fill will
dissipate rockfall and avalanche energy such that buildings will not be damaged
and rocks and debris will not be deflected adversely onto adjacent public or
private property. This will protect residents and others and will satisfy the Town
of Vail hazar d regulations.
2 OBJECTIVES AND LIMITATIONS
As requested by Mr. Steve Riden, this report has the following objectives:
a. Analysis of the dynamics and resulting hazardfrom design-magnitudel
rocKall and avalanches on the subject properties;
b. Quantification of the impact and/or static loads on exposed buildings;
c. Recommendations of mitigation procedures that are feasible at or
above the buildings;
d. Discussion of any adverse deflection of rockfall and avalanches onto
adjacent properties; and
e. Discussion of risk.
This report also has the following limitations which should be understood by all
those relying on the results and recommendations:
a. only rocKall, and snow and debris avalanches are considered; other
hazards or constraints to development, if any, are beyond the scope of
the studY;
b. The analysis is based on building locations provided in the Steve
Riden drawings given to me in April, 2001.
c. Any substantial changes to the terrain or forest cover (e.g', by forest
fire or landslides) above the building sites may increase the hazard,
d. Extraordinary events (e.9., with return periods of 300, 1000 years or
longer) may exceed the sizes delineated or analyzed in this report; and
e. The study is site-specific and may not be applicable at other sites.
3 PREVIOUS WORK
The Town of Vail has developed rocffall, debris avalanche, and snow avalanche
maps which indicate Lots 8, 10, and 12 (as well as some adjacent lots) lie within
hazard areas or potential hazard areas. These Vail maps are generalized thus
do not indicate the physical characteristics or destructive potentials of the above
processes. Modifications to these maps based on site-specific analysis and
more detailed study have been provided in Figures 6 and 7 of this report.
Additional site-specific hazard or hazard mitigation studies for Lots 8, 10, and 12
have not been completed since the original Vail studies.
4 TOPOGMPHIC SETTING AND SITE OBSERVATIONS
Figure 1 is a generalized location map of the project area taken from U' S.
Geological Survey topographic data. The approximate location of the rockfall
1 Design-magnitude - Events with return periods of approximately 100 years. Avalanches do
have retum periods because evenls of one year are not related to those of subsequent years'
however, rocldall events may be dependent on evenis of prior years.
FTGURE 1. Vicinity map snowngfiudy area and approximate location of Lots 8-12 At this
location, avalanches and rockfaii begii primarity below 8,680 feet elevation level within or below
the limestone cliffs. Many itn'i, u,i*bnes, debris flows, or tockfalls also occur in the general
vicinity but are not snown on this map. Hazard delineation and subdivision into red and hlue
zones are shown in more detait on Figures 6 and 7.
SCALE: 1" = 500'
J D 1'opoQuad3 Copyright O 1999 DeLorme Yurntouih. lltE 0'{096 Source Dltrl: LISGI ft Scllcr l:6,000 Dctsll: t4-3 Dutum: WGS8{
and avatanche area and lot locations are indicated and the generaltopography of
the immediate area is shown. The steep colluvial (rock and debris) slopes below
the limestone cliff shown in Figure 2 is littered with boulders, smaller rocks and
assorted debris. This materiairesults from the combined effects of rockfall,
FtGuRE 2. Oblique photograph (taken from the northeast on April 27, 2001) of Bridge Road cul-
de-sac and the iest end of Lipiie Drive. Steep coltuvial slopes below limestone cliff band can
iroiu"" small-to-moderate sized ava!an"h"". Ro9A4l o!9''"t":*ithi!:!!"'
FIGURE 3. Oblique photo$aph showing greater cletait in proiect area (above L_upine Drive and
south of cul-de-sac)'ana tne iunout area for the rockfall and avalanches. Very large limestone
boulders near houies probably originate from glacial activity ratherthan rockfall.
avalanches, other mass-wasting procssses and glacial activity. Much of the
upper Gore Creek Valley was the site of extensive glaciation_during the
fleistocene glacial epoch which ended here 10,000 to 20,000 years before
present. Thi extensive glaciation probably scraped rocks from the cliffs and
deposited many near the present location of homesites as the ice melted.
Alt,ernately, a single or multiple rockfall, rock avalanche' or landslide event(s)
may havaoccurred and deposited these rocks. However, the major boulders,
"Jd""r to have been in place for over 1000 years, perhaps more than 10,000
years, judging from soil development and lichen growth on the rock surfaces (see
Figure 4).
FIGURE 4. Major A-1A foot-long boulder in the vicinity of the tower building site on Lot 8. Boulder
probabty reached this position cturing or immediately fotlowing vailey deglaciation, not from
'rockfati
tt may have moved into ptice ftom tandslides that occuned after valley deglaciation or
by mefting glacial ice. tt is untikety that this boutcter fetl ftom the cliffs as an isolated event
iecause-it'would have rolled much farther or broken into smaller rocks. Soil around the boulder
and tichen cover on the surtace suggesfs rf has been in the cunent position for at least 1 000'3000
years, possibly more than 10,000 years.
Rockfall and debris-avalanches have also occurred since valley deglaciation and
deposited smaller boulders in the vicinity of existing and proposed houses. Such
examples are widespread on the colluvial slope above lupil" Drive and other
areas within the valley. An example of a rocKall-deposited boulder is shown in
Figure 5. This 3-foot diameter boulder rests on the soil surface and probably has-
faiien into place during the past several centuries as a result of rockfall. Rocks of
this size have the capability of reaching the proposed houses and therefore
require mitigation. They aie the basis of the rockfall modeling conducted in this
study.
FIG;RE S. Rockfall4erived boulder approximately 2.5-3.0 feet long which feil from the limestone
cliffs. Notebook is apToximatety one-foot long. A 3.}-foot diameter rock similar to this one was
ii"a in tn" rockfalt dynamics aiatysis and was the basis forthe mitigation recommendations.
5 ROCKFALL AND AVALANCHE MODELING METHODS APPLIED
5.1 Rockfall Modeling
The velocities, kinetic energies, and bounce heights of rockfall events at the
proposed buildings have been quantified through application of the Colorado
ilockfall Simulation Program (CRSP), a stochastic rocKalldynamics program
developed by the Colorido Department of Transportation and the Colorado
School of Mines.
The following steps were used in application of CRSP:
a. Rock source areas were identified in the field and through analysis of
aerial photograPhs.
b. The colluviai slope below the limestone cliff was characterized in terms
of steepness, roughness, and hardness, parameters used in the CRSP
analysis.
c. The sizes of boulders and their probable stopping positions were
determined in the field.
A
The CRSP model was forced to produce boulder stopping positions as
determined in the field.
Velocities, kinetic energies, and bounce heights at selected analysis
points (positions of mitigation) were determined at the building
locations by the CRSP analYsis.
The maximum extent of 3-foot diameter rocks (the design rockfall event) in the
project area is shown on Figure 6. This map should be used to update the
exiiting Town of Vail rockfall hazard maps which were prepared in 1984.
Complete details of the results of the rocKall-dynamics analysis are provided in
Appendix A. A summary of the design criteria which were used to develop the
rocKall mitigation measures recommended in Section 6 are provided in Table 1-
Note: MitigatiOn design Cfiteria are based on me 9U7o Cumuaflve proDarrttfty teve\ I(teat,t,,g tlc,.
fhere exlsfi a 10% probabilv that the design rockfatt event (vrhich is a rare event) will exceed the
criteia.
5.2 Avalanche modeling
Avalanche dynamics were modeled by fitting a three-parameter stochastic model
of avalanche motion to the flow, assuming a starting position at the cliff band and
a stopping position consistent with observed stopping positions observed in
topoliaptilcally similar paths in Colorado. The following two steps were used as
recommended by the Colorado Geological Survey:
a. First the design-magnitude avalanche stopping position was
determined by tenain analysis, observations of prior events in similar
terrain, and statistical modeling;
b. second the avalanche-dynamics modelwas used to compute energy
(of clear snow and debris avalanches) to determine the red/blue
hazard zone boundary (mapped in Figure 7).
Avalanche velocities computed in step "b" at the proposed buildings were
determined to be 1Qm/s (22 mph) or less and would produce impact pressures
generally less than 400 lbs/ft2 at the bases of large, flat walls normal to the flow.
Because the apparent avalanche return period at the proposed buildings is more
than 25 years, this would place buildings in the "blue" (moderate hazard) zone,
as indicated on Figure 7. According to the Vail hazard regulations, construction
with mitigation is allowed in such areas.
A
e.
Table 1. Rockfall criteria for on
Site Velocity Kinetic Energy Bounce Height
Lot 8 building
(Upper)
51.30 fVsec 120.027 ft{bs 7.69 ft
Lot 8 building
(Lower)
39.30 fUsec 74.167 ft-lbs 15.51 ft
Lot 10 buildins 51.07 fVsec 117.046 ft-lbs 7.60 ft
Lot 12 building 41.97 ftlsec 89.848 ft-lbs 5.85 ft
are based on the meaning
I
[
.,]
I
Jil
a
t:
;.i;!
;l;;
.1,'i:,;?ii
FTGURE 7. Map of the maximum extent of snow or clebris avalanches in the Bridge Road and
west Lupine Drive area. Red (high hazard) and Blue (moderate hazard) zones are shown. Map
was produced from aerial photography taken in 1997, thus recent construction does not appear
on the map.
SCALE: 1" = 100'
ii". i,
f ,;ii.t:;
.;l
V;it;)'
7
. 6 MITIGATION
Two forms of mitigation from rocKall and avalanches is recommended. These
recommendations are based on the observations and analyses presented eadier
in this report.
6.1 Berms against back walls
The recommended mitigation form consists simply of berms built against the
uphill walls of buildings (Figure 8). These berms must be built to a height of I -
10 feet to dissipate rockfall and avalanche energy. The required heights are
given in Table 2.
Table 2. Berm desion criteria
BUILDING LOCATION BERM HEIGHT
Lot 8 buildins (upper)10 feet
Lot 8 building (lower)8 feet
Lot 10 building 10 feet
Lot 12 buildins addition 8 feet
Berm surfaces should have a slope of 1 Tz: L Walls must be designed to
withstand the static soil load, it being assumed that the impact loads of rockfall or
avalanches will be dissipated by the deformable soil and rock material of the
berms.
FIGURE E. Rockfall and avalanche betms placed against the uphill walls will provide mitigation
on Lofs 8, 10, and 12. me required berm heights for various locations are provided in Table 2.
Berm swfaces should be at a 1 % : 1 slope. Wndows within the lower 12 feet of the back wall
should he reinforced for a normal pressure of 100 lbstf . Bems witl not def,ect rocks or
snoildebris mirtures onto adjacent public or private proryfty.
Windows within the lower 12 feet of the back walls should either be avoided,
minimized in surface area, or reinforced for a pressure of 100 lbs/ft2
An alternate form of mitigation, which is primarily used for defense against
rockfall is the energy-absorbing fence (Figure 9).
FTGURE 9. Energy-absorbing rockfall fence (manufactured by GeoBrugg of Sanfe Fe' NM)
instatled above a house near Telluride. Tris is a "medium-energf absorbing fence which woulcl
be capable of dissipating rocks with the design energies above Lots 8, 10, and 12. Snow or
debris avalanches could also reach the fence would reguire uffight po,sts fo be spaced closer
than in this photograph.
This type of fence has been widely used in Europe and the United States,
primarily above highway rockfall areas. The medium capacity fence shown in
Figure 9 is approximately 9 feet high and would cost approximately $300-$500
per foot installed. Each fence would be within approximately 50 feet of each
building and would extend the full width of the structure. Modifications to the
fence design would probably be required in order to withstand avalanche loads.
Although either berms or rockfallfences could be used, the final choice will
depend on cost, environmental disruption, and esthetic considerations. These
choices can be made during the final design stage.
Report prepared by
O*nlriv\.r,ng
Arthur l. Mears, P.E.
Avalanche-control eng ineer
. TECHNICAL APPENDIX A. Rockfall-dynamics analysis
The following pages provide input and output data used in computing rocKall
dynamics parameters at the building sites.
I
CRSP Input File - Dlcrsp\Bighorn Lot 8.dat
Inout File Specifi cations
Units ofMeasure: U.S.
Total Number of Cells: 8
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 1: 425
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 2: 481
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 3:
Initial Y-Top Starting Zone Coordinate: 8660
Initial Y-Base Starting Zone Coordinate: 8640
Remarks:
Cell Data
I
z
J
4
5
6
7
8
.5
.)
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
0
30
150
340
425
465
481
5ll
8640
8600
8520
8420
8390
8380
8376
8374
30
150
340
425
465
481
5il
561
8600
8520
8420
8390
8380
8376
8374
8370
oo
CRSP Analysis Point Statistical Analysis - D:\crsp\Bighorn Lot 8.dat
Analysis Point I
AnalysisPoint 1: X= 425, Y: 8390
Spherical Rock: 3-ft dia, 2333-lb
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 78
cumulative Probabilitv velocity (ff/sec) Enersr ($lb) Bounce Height (ft)
5jYo
75%
90%
95Yo
98%
33.46 62938
42.85 92994
51.3 120027
56.37 136257
62.06 154472
1.61
4.81
7.69
9.42
I 1.36
Note: Velocity and kinetic energy are analyzed assuming a normal distributton.
Bounce height is analyzed aszuming a log distribution.
CRSP Analysis Point Statistical Analysis - D:\crsp\Bighom Lot 8 dam.dat
Analysis Point I
AnalysisPoint l: X: 440, Y: 8400
Spherical Rock: 3-ft dia., 2333-lb
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 9
50%
75%
90%
9s%
98%
14.2
18.91
23.15
25.69
28.55
153sl
23233
30323
34579
393s6
0.37
2.21
3.87
4.86
5.97
Note: Velocity and kinetic energy are analyzed assuming a normal distribution.
Bounce height is analyzed assuming a log distribution.
CRSP Input File - D:\crsp\Bighorn Lot 8 dam.dat
Input File Specifi cations
Units ofMeasure: U.S.
Total Number of Cells: i0
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 1: 440
Analysis Point X-Coor dnate 2:
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 3:
Initial Y-Top Starting Zone Coordinate: 8660
Initial Y-Base Starting Zone Coordinate: 8640
Remarks:
Cell Data
Cell No. Surface R. Tangent C. Normal C. Begin X Begin Y End X End Y
l .5 .8 .5 0 8640 30 8600
2 ,5 .8 .5 30 8600 1s0 8520
3 1.5 .7 .3 150 8520 340 8420
4 1.5 .7 .3 340 8420 425 8390
5 .5 .7 .3 425 8390 440 8400
6 .5 .7 .3 440 8400 45s 8390
7 7.5 .7 .3 455 8390 465 8380
8 1.5 .7 .3 465 8380 481 8376
9 1.5 .7 .3 481 8376 511 8374
10 .3 .8 .3 5r I $74 561 8370
CRSP Analysis Point Statistical Analysis - D:\crsp\Bighorn Lot 8.dat
Analysis Point 2
Analysis Point 2: X: 481, Y : 8376
Spherical Rock: 3-ft Cna, 2333-lb
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 44
Cumulative Probabilitv Velocity (fl/sec) Energy (ft-lb) Bounce Height Cft)
s0% 24.97 36668 0.69 75% 32.52 56410 8.49 90% 39.3 74167 15.51 95o/o 43.38 84827 19.72 98% 47.95 96792 24.4s
Note: Velocity and kinetic energy are analyzed assuming a normal distribution.
Bounce height is analyzed assuming a log distribution.
CRSP InputFile - D:\crsp\BighornLot 8 dam2.dat
Input File Specifications
Units of Measure: U.S.
Total Number of Cells: 9
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 1: 493
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 2: 0
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 3: 0
Initial Y-Top Starting Zone Coordinate: 8660
Initial Y-Base Starting Zone Coordinate: 8640
Remarks:
Cell Data
I
2
4
5
6
7
8
o
0
30
150
340
425
465
481
493
505
8640
8600
8520
8420
8390
8380
8376
8384
8376
8600
8520
8420
8390
8380
8376
8384
8376
8370
30
150
340
425
465
481
493
505
s6l
CRSP Analysis Point Statistical Aralysis - D:\crsp\Bighorn Lot 8 dam?.dat
Analysis Point 1
AnalysisPoint 1: X: 493, Y: 8384
Spherical Rock: 3-ft dia.,2333-lb
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 4
500/o
7sYo
9jYo
95%
98Yo
8.48
8.48
8.48
8.48
8.48
7037
7037
7037
7037
7037
0.02
0.7
1.3 1
1.67
2.08
Note: Velocity and kinetic enerry are analyzed assuming a normal distributton.
Bounce height is analyzed assuming a log distribution.
CRSP Input File - D:\crsp\Bighom Lot l0.dat
Input File Specifications
Units ofMeasure: U.S.
Total Number of Cells: 10
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 1: 380
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 2:
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 3:
Initial Y-Top Starting Zone Coordinate: 8660
Initial Y-Base Starting Zone Coordinate: 8640
Remarks:
Cell Data
Cell No. Surface R. Tangent C. Normal C. Begin X Begin Y End X End Y
1
2
J
4
5
6
8
9
l0
0
40
110
230
360
400
420
46s
490
530
8640
8600
8560
8480
8420
8400
8394
8386
8382
8378
40
110
230
360
400
420
465
490
530
570
8600
8560
8480
8420
8400
8394
8386
8382
8378
8376
' CRSP Analysis Point Statistical Analysis - D:\crsp\Bighom Lot t0.dat
Analysis Point I
Analysis Point 1: X : 380, Y: 8410
Spherical Rock 3-ft dia., 2333-lb
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 91
50%
7s%
90%
95%
98%
32.83
42.43
51.o7
56.25
62.O7
59678
89881
117046
133355
151659
1.47
4.69
7.6
9.34
7t.29
Note: velocity and kinetic energy are analyzed assuming a normal distribution.
Bounce height is analyzed assuming a log distribution.
CRSP InputFile - D:\crsp\Boghornlot 10 dam.dat
Input File Specifications
Units ofMeasure: U.S.
Total Number of Cells: i2
Analysis Point X-Coordinate l: 395
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 2:
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 3:
Initial Y-Top Starting Zone Coordinate: 8660
Initial Y-Base Starting Zone Coordinate: 8640
Remarks:
Cell Data
8600
8560
8480
8420
8410
8420
8410
8386
8382
8378
8376
8375
40
110
230
360
380
395
410
465
490
530
570
580
8640
8600
8560
8480
8420
8410
8420
8410
8386
8382
8378
8376
0
40
ti0
230
360
380
395
410
465
490
530
570
I
2
J
4
)
o
8
9
10
l1
12
CRSP Analysis Point Statistical Analysis - D:\crsp\Boghorn Lot 10 dam.dat
Analvsis Point I
AnalysisPoint 1: X= 395, Y : 8420
Spherical Rock 3-ft dia, 2333-lb
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 1l
50%
'15%
90%
95%
98%
13.s
17.38
20.87
22.96
25.32
T4237
20946
26987
30613
34683
U.J )
6.36
rt.77
15.01
18.66
Nde: Velocity and kinetic energy are analyzed assuming a normal distribution'
Bounce height is andyzed assuming a log distribution'
CRSP Input File - D:\crsp\Bighorn Lot lL.dat
Input File Specifications
Units of Measure: U.S.
Total Number of Cells: l0
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 1: 410
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 2:
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 3:
Initial Y-Top Starting Zone Coordinate: 8660
Initial Y-Base Starting Zone Coordinate: 8640
Remarks:
Cell Data
Cell No. Surface R. Tangent C. Normal C. Begin X Begin Y End X End Y
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
.5
.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
.J
.2
.2
.8
.8
.f
0
35
l3s
285
345
375
395
419
456
476
8640
8600
8520
8440
8420
8410
8398
8396
8392
8390
35
135
285
345
375
395
419
456
476
516
8600
8520
8440
8420
8410
8398
8396
8392
8390
8388
.7
.8
.8
.8
ol
CRSP Analysis Point Statistical Analysis - D:\crsp\Bighom Lot l2.dat
Analysis Point I
Analysis Point 1: X = 410, Y: 8397
Spherical Rock: 3-ft dia., 2333-lb
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 47
Cumulative Probability Velocity (ff/sec) Energy (ft-lb) Bounce Heicht (ft)
50% 24.43 38322 0.84
7s% 33.67 65449 3.48
90% 41.97 89848 5.8s
95o/o 46.96 104497 7.28
98% s2.s6 r2093't 8.87
Note: Velocity and kinetic energy are analyzed assuming a normal distribution.
Bounce height is analyzed assuming a log distribution.
o
CRSP
Input File Specifications
Units of Measure: U.S.
Total Number of Cells: 12
Analysis Point X-Coordnate1: 422
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 2:
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 3:
Initial Y-Top Starting Zone Coordinate: 8660
Initial Y-Base Starting Zone Coordinate: 8640
Remarks:
o
Input File - D:\orsp\Bighorn Lot 12 dam.dat
I
2
3
4
)
6
7
8
9
10
11
L2
0
35
135
28s
345
375
395
410
422
434
456
476
8640
8600
8520
8440
8420
8410
8398
8397
8405
8397
8392
8390
35
135
285
345
375
395
410
422
434
456
476
516
8600
8520
8440
8420
8410
8398
8397
8405
8397
8392
8390
8388
CRSP Analysis Point Statistical Analysis - D:\crsp\Bighom Lot 12 dam.dat
Analysis Point I
AnalysisPoint l:X= 422,Y= 8405
Spherical Rock: 3-ft dia., 23331b
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 9
Cumulative Probability Velocity (fl/sec) EnerCy (ftlb) Bounce Height (.ft)
50% 7.32 5105 0.07 75% 10.67 9729 7.28
90% 13.69 13888 13.77 95% 15.5 16385 17.66 98% 17.53 19787 22.03
Note: Velocity and kinetic energy are analyzed assuming a normal distribution.
Bounce height is analyzed assuming a log distribution.
10
TECHNICAL APPENDIX B. Avalanche-dynamics analysis
The following pages provide slope profiles and avalanchedynamics analysis
used in determining the loading parameters and design specifications of the
recommended avalanche mitigation.
Avalanche Profile and /y coordinates
Bighom Lot E
Raw Data in feet
X-feet Y-feet
0 8600
120 E520
310 8420
395 8390
435 8380
451 8376
48'l 8374
531 8370
Data in meters Segment Data
X-meters Y-meters L-meters Ang - Deg Sum L
2622 .
2s98
2567
2558
2555
2554
2553
2552
Avg Angle
33.7
30.1
2E.0
26.8
26.4
25.2
23.4
theetl
0
44
109
137
149
155
164
175
0
37
95
't20
133
138
147
162
44
65
27
13
5
I
15
33.7
27.8
19.4
14.0
14.O
3.8
4.6
Bighom Lot 8 Avalanche Path
2640
2620
; 260O tr
! ,uuo
r!i zsoo
UJ
2540
2520
2500
o 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Horizontal distance (m)
!
\*
-=la -.E_)
Page 1
220 paxtlcles start fr" t"n segment.33trtiqles degosited-
c:\plk\bighorn lot 8.txt
Path drops: 70 m
Friction rnu = 0.35
1og M/D : 2.00
Random R = 0.200
Alpha = 25.3 degrees
O Front stops at )( = 146 m
.-_-----...-Front speed (max = 11.7 m/s)
--------ltean speed (rnax = 10.7 m/s)
-Deposition
(not to scale)
Exit and view distributions in your fj-le c:\plk\results.txt
Plerse note I alt v-variables
Please notel all t-variables
Please note! NP is nunber of
AVALANCHE ENTERING SE6NE T
I{UI'I BER OF PARIICLES NOVIiI6
IUNEER OT PARTICLES STOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FROIT START
ra<11 l t<
ane ln neters/second 'are in seconds.perticles in packet.
aa0
0
{q
VHI6H
vL0tl
V R AN6E
VITEAN
vslDEv
tHI6H
tL0ld
tR AI{ 6E
TITEAN
TSTDEV
a. tq
3.00
5. 6tl
b. r{?
1.Ar
a.73
0.55
a. 1t
5, LA
e. 0a
,t rN
0. g5
L.37
e. la
3. 00
3. 6a
q. hq
5. qb
h. a?
?. 01 ?.lI
NP
h
1
rrl
t6
z6
30
at
3E
PACKET
3
{
b
7
I
I
10
ttlAx vnEAN
1.3? 3. 00
a. 16 l. 00
3.00 3.31
3.Ae q.35
't.lq 5'e5
5. qb L. 0?
L, a? L. Ae
?. 0l ?. ql
?. 5! a. 0?
6. ?3 a. h0
AVALANCHE ENTERII{6 SE6NENT
NUIIBER OF PARTICLES I'I OVI N6
NUTI BER OF PARTICLES STOPPE!
ItE TERS TRAVELLE} FRON START
VHIGH Iq ' 1E PA
vLolJ 1. ?A
VRAN6E 13. 15
v i EAI{ 10. hL
lsTtEv l.l?
tHI6H }5. 3A tLoU 6, rrr
tRAitGE h. 16 tnEAN 14.53
TSTDEV I ' 3A
AVALANCHE ENTERIiI6 SE6TI ENT
NUII8ER OF PARlICLES IIOVI NC
NUNBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
ltE TERS TRAVELLED FRON START
VHIGH 1' ?3
vLold 0. ]9
VRANGE I. 5q
v iEAlt 5. 53
VSTDEV l. hb
PACKET tNI t rl,. tlL
e 13.65 3 th. ?2 t{ 11. stl
5 24. 3?
h 45. zo
7 46. !3
a 30. 6L
I 33'LA
I0 3h. 5r
tnr
le.7L
13. ha
1{. qa
t5. 3q
lb. 30
vllEAl{tl'hL
6. ha t.30
!0. 10
10. ]q
10. 01
11. 0h
11. 51
],I, 1P
11. 1b
tllAx vnEAfl t3,6t a.?5
lL.?? 6.36
11. str 7 .7E
ea.3? 1.5]a5.e0 l.?0
et. 03 !'. Ce
r0. tL 1. ?1
:l3.br l.al 3L.51 1.5h
31.3q I'A0
tnAX v iEAN
13. ha h. E{
lq , 'ta 5. ?7
15,3'{ h'LL
th. e0 9.6:l
1?. 0h L. 03
CKE T I
3
t{
L
e I
L0
I
aab
o
110
trN tl'l Ax a.r{1 1.10 t.t0 1.40
q. 60 10. 50
r0. 50 11. e0
1r. a0 !l ' al
1!. tr la. 51
!a . 5t 13. a1
13. al 13 . 'll
13. .H lq . ha
lrt . ht 15. 3A
{
3tr
0
!3?
l{P
q
lo
qq
5t
q6
3e
vHr6H 1?. \a
vLot 0. qr
vRAll6E le. oo
v EAt{ 7. LA
VSTDEV e.5q
tHr6H 39. 3q tLol'l Il. 05
rRAl{68 el. ?6
TNEAN lL ' hh tSTDEV 3.11
AVALAT{CHE ENTERING SE6NENT
NUNBER OF PARTICLES ItOVIII6
NUIIBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FRON START
NP
17
l6a
51
rl
g
e
3
e
5
?5L
?0
r50
PACK E T
f
q
t{P
q
1?le
Page L
tHI6H e1.3?tLou l?. ?b IRAIGE l. Ll tnEA lT. qa
ISTDEV 1. ttl
h
7 t
1
IO
r?.01 17.1? 5'he
r?. te lt. ?l 9.50 rt. ?l ll.bc {. bl
11. h5 a0.51 !.15
?0. 5r El. 3? I ' 0?
results
fl| {
13. 5L
Itl. q5
ls.3lt
lb. e3
l?. 13
ra. Ea
ta. tl
1t. t0
P0. hr
a1. 5A
tnAx vllEAll
1q. q5 5. {0 15.3rt q.5?
IL.a3 q.l3
1?.13 q.L3
It.oe. q. al ra..l1 {. a{
13. a0 q. a?
a0. tq 3' e3 ar.5t a. ?r
aa. qt 1.30
5{lg
AL lt
E
AVALAIICHE EI{TERII{6 SEGNEilT
iIUIIBER OF PARTICLES IIOVIIIG
I{UIIEER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
TTETERS ?RAVELLED FRON START
b
e0?tat
155
VHI6H 6' L?
vlou 0. rto
URAI6E A. a?vltEAN { . at
VSTDEV 1. LA
THIGH AA. qA
tLotd 13. 5l
tRAl{6E l. Ca
tgAl{ IA ' al
TSTDEV r.5l
I{UIIBER OF PARTICLES NOVIIIG
IUNBER OF PARIICLES STOPPED
FASTEST PARTICLE SPEED AT FROI{T
FASTEST PARTICLE SPEED (AIIYIHERE'
ALPHA 45. 3 dagrr€s
nAX-DEPosIt lLa !.tcr3
Ittt{-)EP0SIl 13? reters
RAI|GE-DEP0SIT e5 r.ters
IIEAN-DEPOSIT I5A iEt'Ts
S?D-DEV-DEP0SIT L n.tcrs
Packrt iax(!) llin (r) Particlcs
I rrto r3? 3q
e l{a trlo 5
3 tqs l{e I
{ }tl? rtls l1
5 150 r'l? lq
b 15? rS0 th
? 155 l5a 3a
6 r5? I55 r5:l
t r!0 15? 53
IO IL? ILO T
PACKEI
1
a
3 t
llF I
3 Ii
a?
3t
53
31
a3 I
3
s
h
7
A .t
lo
o
331
Ia. o tr/s l{'l r/3
@e2
Avalanche Profile and x/y coordinates
Bighom Lot 10
Raw Data in feet
X-feet Y-feet
0 8600 70 8560
190 8480
320 8420
360 8400
380 8394
425 8386
450 8382
490 8378
530 8376
25
44
44
14
6
14 I
12
12
29.7
33.7
24.8
26.6
16.7
10.1
9.1
5.7
2.9
Avg Angle
29.7
32.3
29.4
29.1
28.5
26.7
25.8
24.4
22.9
Sheetl
Data in meter Scgment Data
X-meters Y-meteF L-meters Ang - Deg Sum L
2622
2610
2585
2567
2581
2559
2557
2555
2554
2554
0
25
69
't't2
126
132
146
154
166
178
0
21
58
98
'110
116
130
't37
149
162
Bighorn Lot 10 Avalanche Path
2620
;26OO c
E ,uro
a!i zsoo
UJ
2540
2520
2500
o 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Horizontal distance (m)
\._
Page I
120 partj-cles startfom top segment'2farticles dePosited'
c:\pIk\bighorn lot 10.txt
Path droPs: 67 m
Fricti.on mu = 0.35
Log MlD = 2.2O
Random R - 0.200
Alpha = 24.O degrees
O Front stoPs at { = 152 m
.---.-.-..*.-Front speed (rnax : 13.5 m/s)
-------.--Mean speed (max = I2.9 m/s)
---DePositlon
(not to scale)
Exit and view distributions
in your fIle c:\Plk\results.txt
results
Please note: all v-vapiables are in neters/second.
PleasE note: all t-varlablrs are in seconds.
Pleese note: NP ls numbeF of particles in packet.
AVALAI{CHE EI{TERIN6 SE6NEil T
iIUNBER OF PARTICLES IIOVING
NUTIBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FROII START
VHI6H ?. l0 vLou 3. 00
VRANGE q. }O vttEAt{ 5. 05 VSTDEV 1. 3?
IHI6H L.T'I tlord o. s?IRAN6E 5. 6?
tn EAt'l q. a6 ISTDEV l. 5t
vHI6H th. 50 vLoul a. el
VRANGE lq. al
v iEAl{ 14. 6L
VSTDEV E. E3
IHI6H 10. 73 tL0u 5. L?
IRANGE 5.07 TIIEAN A.q7 tsTlEv l. lL
VHIGH }h. 57 vLoL, I. 33
vRAt{6E 15. eq vnEA lt. OD
VSTDEV 3. at
THIGH IL, 75 tL0l'J l. II tRAl'l6E ?. bq |EAt{ ta. 51 tstDEv 1.5r
PACKET
a
q
L
?
6
I
t0
PACKET tNI N I 5.b?a b. t7 3 L. LC q ?. !5 .5 ?. ht L 6. PO 7 E.1L A 1. AI 1 9. 7e r0 10. a3
PACKET tNIil I l. It a 1.a7 3 lo. L:l q rl. q0
5 ra. lb h la. t3
f tt. b1 t !q. q5
I 15. ae t0 15. ta
e
la0
0
Pq
t tN
0.97
1, ?5
a. 33
a. ie
3. 5t tt,01
q. LA
5.47 g.[L
tnAX vllEAil l. lh 3. E0 l. ?5 3. 00
a. 33 3. O0 e.ie 3.1?3.5t :t.t0 q.01 q. {5 q.b6 5.0t
5. e? 5. bl
5. AL L. E?
L. qq L. t3
tnAX vnEAil
h. r? 13. q6
L.ba 10.b6
7. 11 10. q1
?. hc 11. 69 a.E0 tl.0?6.?1 lq.!1 1.21 rq . 00 1.72 lq.11
10. ?3 l{ . 6t
r0. ?3 13. hq
AVALINCHE EN TERII{6 SEGNEN T
NUNBER OF PARTICLES I' OVIiIG
I{UIIBER OF PARTICLES SIOPPED
IIETERS TRAVELLED FRON S1ART
1
lLS
0
L1
{
e09
0 lr3
E
zce
0
tah
t{P
{
5
7 I tl
t3
t6
at
t'lP
rl
{la
]T It
1S a)
e0
te
NP
q
t3
7?
31
rl?
3A
.t5
tq
I1
AVALANCHE ENTERING SE6IIEI{T
ilUNBER OF PARIICLES NOVIIIG
UNEER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
IIE1ERS TRAVELLED FRON S1ART
AVALAI{CHE ENTERIN6 SEGIIEN T
NUIIBER OF PARTICLES NOVII{6
I{UIIBER OF PARTICLES S
'OPPED NETERS IRAVELLED FRON STAR T
VHI6H I?.IIP PA
v LolJ !. L2
VRAN6E 15. AO
vllEAt{ 11. 3{vs?DEV 3. 1r
tnAX v[EA 1.6? 13.?5
ro . L3 14. 01 rr. q0 14. 5a
le . th II. 7{
le . 13 rr. 7s
13 . Ll rr. 3{
1{. q5 1. ea 15.E? b.{'l 15.lt 7. 3r
lL.?5 h.70
tnIN IAX vnEAr{l.15 I0.?l 13.5a r0.?.L.h{ rt. l0 Il. Lq le . {6 ra. qa
ra.qt 13.3a 11.a3 t3.34 rq,lh le.3a
P
tl
t3
3q
qa
5a
CKE?I
e
3
q
Page 1
results
thr6H 16. 3h tLoU 1. 95
tRAl'l6E A. rt]
trEAN 13. ?l
TSTDEV I. 73
VHI6H IA. AA vLold 0. qtl
VRAI6E 11. 6{
VTl EAN 1 .78
VSTIEV a. e1
tHI6H AO.6A tLolt 1r.51 rRAt{6E '1. 36 I'EAN rg. qq
TSTDEV ]. A1
VHI6H 7. q5
vLou 5. a?
vRAilGE e. lA
vllEAN b. la
vSTDEV U. b0
t5 . 00 12. 0l !s.tq a.0b
tt. bt a. 0L
17. ga l. lt5
16. 3E 6. 35
at
I5
I5
!5
{
b
.6
I
l0
Iq. IE
15. 00
15. 6q
LE. hI
l?. 5a
7
I?h
LL
lqh
NP
5
tc
3h
lb
L1
I
AVALANC}IE ENTERIII6 SEGNE T
NUNBER OF PARTICLES N OVI iI6
NUNEER OF PARTICLES STOPPE!
IIETERS TRAVELLED FRON START
E
zaI
7
l3a
vHr6H lb. l5
v L0tl1 I. 50
vRAil6E 1q. bs vnEAil lo. ?0
VSTDEV Z. 3A
tHr6H ]1. 0l tL0t! r,0. 3?
IRAN6E A. ?E
tnEA ltt. {a
tsTrEv r. 6l
PACKEI tItI l{! 10.3?e 11. atl 3 le. la rl 14. 11 5 13. tb L l,tl. ?3 7 15. bl a th. {[
1 1?. 3s I0 la. ae
tnAx vllEAl{
Ir . aq l!. a?l?.la ta. il
Ia.11 14.3r
13. 6b la ' a{l{. 73 10. lq
15 . b! 10. 05
lL. ql 7. s7
1?. !5 ?. qa
16. ea 7.1b
11.01 ?. Lr
tll Ax vllEAl{
ta.q5 1.05 13.3A 1. 13
r{. 3e a. 5a
15, eL A. {1
lL. a0 l. r'l
l?. 13 l. L3
]t. 0? q. 5q
lt.or s.ql
11. t5 q.0L
a0.tt a.Eq
INAX V NEA
la. 11 1.3?
13 . ?6 10. 3s
lrt . 5? 6. li
15.3b L. 13
lL. lrt ?. 1!
th.13 b'?0 L?.72 q ' lb
It.5l q.3q
11.30 0.00
e0.05 5.11
AVALANCHE ENTERI IiG SEGNEN1
NUNBER OF PARTICLES NOVI116
NUNBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FROfI S TART
AVALANCHE ENTERIN6 SEGNENT
NUNBER OF PARTICLES NOVING
NUII BER OF PARIICLES STOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FRON START
PACKET TIIIN I 11. 51 z ra. {s
3 13. 3A q lq.3e 5 15. aL L lL. a0 ? I?. If
e 16. E7
1 11. 01,
t0 l,l. 15
PACKET TIIII{! le. e0 e 14. 11 3 !3. ?A
'{ lq.s?5 !5. 3L b rE. lrl ? th. 13 a t'1.7?1 ra. 5r lo 11. 30
NP
h
l0
at
31
5L
IE
{
3
7
7
VHI6H ]4. q5
vLoll O.5q
vRAl,l6E Il ' lI
vlfEAl{ 1.)'1
VSTDEV e. ql
tHr6H a0. 0l
tLou 12. e0
IRAN6E 1. L6
rnEAN 15. ??
ISTDEV }. ?L
AVALANCI{E EIITERIT{6 SEGNEliT
IUNBER OF PARIICLES NOVIIIG
ilUNBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FROII S TART
t
taq
les
153
I
''
a5a
lL5
t{P
{
I3
33 al
1q {
0
1
PA CKE T I
t
3
q
lrll tnax vllEAt{
l't . 30 lq. ba L. ?7 tq.L? lq.lq 0.uB t'r.lq !5.e5 0'oo
15. a5 15.97 5'qU
0
0
Page 2
o -
THIGH 17. q?
tLou Iq.30 tRAl{6E 3.1?
TNEAN 15 ' IL ts?DEv 1,25
15.5? 15.61 15,ll lL. el
lb. ?1 lb.5a lb.5? rL.lrl tb.lq r?. rL
r7, th L?.47
E
ebg
15. b r/5
1?. rr r/s
results
5
L
7
e
1 l0
o. 00
o. 00
0. 00
h. 50 5,lt
5. t3
0
0
0
e I :
XUiSER OF PARTICLES IIOVIX6
TUNgER OF PARIICLES SIOPPED
FASTEST PARTICLE SPEED A' FROI{T
FASTEST PAR'ICLE SPEED ( AI{YTIHERE )ALP]IA Pq.0 d3gnecs
nAX-DEPoSIT ILa mt.rs iII{-DEPOSIT IaL r.trrs RAi|GE-DEP0SII qa rtrPs nEAil-DEPoSlT l5I rrt.rs
STD-DEV-DEPoSIT I rttrrs
Prcket tlax(t) fln(r) P.rticles I 130 lAb 5 e llq 130 Il 3 l3t l3q t5 { 1q3 131 It 5 lrt ? lq3 at L 151 lq? qa
? r55 151 qA
a lho 155 sa t lhrt tLo a6 10 th6 lEq 17
Page 3
Avalanche Profile and x/y coordinates
Bighom Lot 12
Raw Data in feet
X-feet Y-feet
8600
E520
8440
8420
8410
8398
8396
8392
8390
8388
Sheetl
Data in meters Segment Data
X-meters Y-meters L-meters Ang - Deg Sum L
0
100
250
2,t n
340
360
384
421
441
4E1
0
39
91
110
120
127
134
't46
152
't64
0
30
76
95
104
110
117
128
134
147
2622
2598
2573
2567
2564
2560
2560
2559
2558
2557
38.7
28.1
18.4
1E.4
31.0
4.8
6.2
5.7
2.9
39
52
19
10
7
7
11
6
12
Avg Angle
38.7
32.6
30.1
29.2
29.3
28.0
26.3
25.5
23.8
Bighom Lot 12 Avalanche Path
; 2600
E
.t zsoo
a!
B zsoo
tr
2540
2500
60 80 100 120 't40
Horizontal distance (m)
160 180 200
t
Page 1
192 particles starilrom top segment'2f particles deposited.
i.
L
t
c:\plk\bighorn lot 12.txt
Path drops: 64 m
Fri-ction mu = 0.35
Iog M/D = 2.30
Random R = 0.200
Alpha = 26.2 degrees
O Front stoPs at X = L26 m
..--..---.---Front speed (max : 10-7 m/s)
--------]lean speed (max : 1-1.7 m/s)
-Deposition
(not to scale)
Exit and view distributions
i-n your file c:\Plk\results.txt
Please note I sll v-variables
Please note I all t-varlables
Pleasr note: NP is number of
AVALAiICHE EI{TERI N6 SE6IIEIIT
I,IUI'BER OF PARTICLES IIOVIN6
UNBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
IIETERS TRAVELLED FROII START
results
dne in metErs/s3cond.
are ln seconds.
Particles in pecket.
o
l9a
0
:IA
VHI6H
vL0[l
VRANGE
vllEAil
VSTDEV
tHI6H
tLol,
tRAI{6 E
tn E At{
TSTDEV
l.trl
I'UU
L.lrr
L. t0
7.?1
0. sr
b.7b rt.ll
t. ?1
PACKET I
e
q
5
I
7
A
'|t0
tllril
0. sl
t. 1a
I. f,L
a. 5{r.aI f.t1
5. arl
5. te
E. 5.1
tnAX vllEAll t,t6 :t.00 1.Ah 1.00
e. 5q !.3h
3. AI q .3e
3. At 5. al {.57 6. eO g.a{ 7.06 5,la 7.1e
L. 51 E. ??1.?7 1.q6
NP
q
A tt
I5
IA al
a{
e7
30
AVALAI{€HE EI{IERING SE6NE T
IIUIIBER OF PARIICLES NOVII{6
UNBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FRON START
3
aqq
0
10
q
a:t1
as ll0
VHIGH 15. 5A vlot I. ta
vRAl't6E 13. ?0 VNEA IT,. EA vSTDEV a. 3b
THIGH I?, Oq tloLl 1.t7 tRANGE q. A?tnEA t0. 0?ISTDEV 0. tq
v HI6l{ 13. 6?vloll l. 1A
VRAI{GE 11. E6
VIEAN I. A?VSTDEV E. 13
IHI6H IL. O3
tL0ltl l. 5e
tRAt{6E L. 5}TNEA IA. EA tsTDEv r. ob
PACKET TIIII{I 't. L't A ?. LE 3 A. 15 r't 6. h3 5 1. ra h 1. EI ? 10. l0 a 10.56 I 11. 0?l0 11. 5L
tll^X vnEAN
?. LI IO. ET
a, 15 II. 53 t. h3 q. t6 l.Ia 10.11
1. hl rr. l0
I0. l0 11. :lg
I0. 5A l] . aL rl.0? !a. 12 Ir. 5b t3. l0
la . 0q !4. so
tlllll tllAx vllE^l{q.s? l0.t? 1.5q
10. 17 10 . a? 10. tl 10.64 tt, q? 10. Pt rI. q7 le. ta l,B. ?5
r,e. re Ie . ?a 1. 3?la.7a !3. q! q. 7a
13 . {:t ltt . 0a E. 6l lq.nt I{.73 0.00 lq.?3 15.36 a.50
15. 3t tb. 03 r. 16
t{P
I
q
I
ar
17
{6 {t
AA
AVALANCHE E I'ITERIN6 SEGIIENT
iIUII EER OF PARTICLES NOVING
NUNBER OF PARIICLES S TOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FROII S TART
PACKET
q
h
A
I
l0
t{P l0
th
TL
rth
q?
Iq
E
3 I
AVALAI{CHE E]{ TERI N6 SE6NE T
NUII BER OF PARTICLES NOVITIG
UNBER OF PARIICLES STOPPED
NE1ERS TRAVELLED FRON START
:tq
3q llc
VHIGH 13. ?3
v Lott 0, 10
VRAN6E te. t3 vltEAt{ c. a5 vSTDEV a, aa
tnril t^x
10. 3? ll . 5l
11, 5I re . b5
le. h5 13 . ?l
13, ?.t tq.l{
]q. 3lq lh. 0a
PACKE T
q
5
vltEAll
1. L0 l.9l
7. 77
a.lL
5, re
t{P
1A
?3
10
qe
6
Page 1
AVALAtiCI{E EI{TERI iI6 SE6IIEIiT
I{UIIBER OF PARTICLES N OVI N6
NUNBER OF PAR1ICLES STOPPED
T,IETERS TRAVELLED FRON S1ART
results
th. ol l? . aa
1? . aa ta. 3h
r[. rh 11. 5r lt. 51 e0 . h5
E0. b5 aI. ?3
h
3rl
laL
O
tHr6H al. ?1
tLot 10. 3?
TRANGE 1l. qA
tnEAN 13. ltl
TSTDEV I. SO
h
7
6 j
IO
3. OS
a,3L
0.00
0.00
1.16
e
0
n
liP t 1l
ae
?E
3L
ea
36
l?
ll
q
VHI6H }5, OE vLol, a. a7
VRAN6E lE. ?5
vllEAN 10. L5
VST}EV A. O5
tHI6H 83. 5A
tLou tr!. 0h
TRANGE T?. 5P
TNEAN 13. Aq
tST}EV I. LL
AVALANCHE EI'ITERI N6 SE6IIEt'IT
NIJII BER OF PARTICLES NOVIN6
NUI1 BER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FRON S TART
VHI6H ]0. tlq
v Lolt o. 15
v RAI'IGE 1. rl1
viEAr{ 5. b3
VSTDEV 1. 6A
tHI6H I?. 03
tLolt ]e. 1l
tRAN6E II. Aq tnEAN lq.5a
ISTDEV 1. 0q
Packet [1ax(m)
a lEl
3 lE!
'I lII 5 llL L lea
7 l?1 a L3a I 13t t0 ltt3
PACKET t,III N
I 11. 0L
e la. 31
3 13. g?
rt ltt ' aa
5 !E.Ut
b l/.5E ? I'4. 5?E !c. aa I e}, 0t r0 aa. 33
1
e1?
7E
133
PACKET tlII N
r 14. !c P le. b7
5 15. rE rl ll. Lq
5 lq. 13
h lq. hr
? 15. 01
a 15. Sl
I rh. 0h
l0 th. 55
rnAx vnEA[
re. 31 10 ' Ll
13. 5? 1,1. 10
Lq. aa 11. 0?
th. B? 1. ?1
!7. 3a ?. ql
rt. 5? b, 't0 !5, ta L. qa
Pr,. 0a 0. otl ae.33 0.00
?3. 5A b. 1,6
tnAX vnEAN ta.L? L.50
13, lh b.lt
u.Etr b.05
1{.13 h.0l
r{.bl h'01
15.01 5.?q
15.56 5. q5
rE. 0b q .3q
lL . g5 3. :lL
1?.03 3.eL
ilP
30
A5 q?
aq
E
0
0
3
NUNBER OF PARTICLES NOVII{G I
NUNBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED At?
FASTEST PAR1ICLE SPEEI} AT FRONT 11'I
FAsTEsT PARTICLE SPEED (ANYIIIHERE) 15'?
ALPHA ah. e degnees
iAX-DEP0SIT 1{: meters
nI -DEPoSIT iO meters
RAI{6E-DEP0SIT 53 meters
nEAN-DEPoSIT 131' meters
ST'-DEV-DEPoSIT fo meters
m/s
m/s
llin(n) Pantlcles 107 15 5
l0l L
toh I llL g
llL a T?? 7 ta? aq 13? 1t3 l3a ttq
Page 2
Depafimenl of Commuity Development
75 South Frcntage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-21i8
FAX 970-479-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
August 22, 2001
Steve Riden
P.O. Box 3238
Vail, CO 81658
Rc: Ftuziq-Daltl MinorSufiivision-Lw 8'g' and 10 Bighon lr nnion
Dear Steve:
Please have the following note added on page I of thc minor subdivision plat:
r Lots 8, 9, and l0 are located within a geologically sensitive area'
Inadditiotl,pleaseensurethatpage2oftheplatisrevisedtoindicatethefo|lowing:
r Total buildable area of Lots 8' 9, & l0 (indicated as a numerical amount)
o Total buildable area oflots 8' 9' & l0 (indicated graphically)
r Locations ofall applicable hazards
o Location of new utilitY easement
If you have any qnestiotts or concems, please do not he$itate to contact firc Lt 970479-2148'
Sincuely,
Planner IVGIS SPecialist
Town of Vail
{p *t"nuor rr*
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
August 13,2001
A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-5, Vail Town Gode, and a
final review of a minor suMivision located at 3816 and 3826 Lupine Drive
and 3828 Bridge Roacl/ Lots 8, 9, & 10, Bighom Subdivision 2no Addition.
Applicant:
Planner:
June Frazier and Jeff Dahl, represented by Steve Riden
Ann Kjerulf
DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUEST
The applicants, June Frazier and Jeff Dahl, represented by Steve Riden, have submitted
an application to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for a minor
subdivision of Lots 8, 9, and 10, Bighorn Subdivision, Second Addition. The Planning and
Environmental Commission reviewed the minor subdivision request at a worksession on
June 25, 2001. At that point in time, survey information for the subject lots was not
available so staff was unable to perform a complete review and provide a
recommendation to the Planning and Environmental Commission. Since that meeting,
staff has received complete survey information and determined that, as proposed, Lot 10
would not meet the buildable area requirement specified in Section 12-6D-5. Hence, the
owner of Lot 10 is requesting a variance from this section in association with the
application for minor subdivision.
Minor Subdivlsion:
The minor suMivision request involves the reconfiguration of the property lines shared by
Lots 8, 9, and 1 0. Pursuant to the Vail Town Code, 13-2-2 (E), a minor subdivision is
defined as follows:
"Minor suffiivision" shall mean any subdivision containing not more than
four (4) lots fronting on an existing street, not involving any new street or
road or the extension of Municipal facilities aN not adversely affecting the
development of the remainder of the parcel or adjoining property."
Currently, Lot 8 is 0.87 Acres in size, Lot I is 0.34 Acres in size, and Lot 10 is 0.30 Acres
in size. With a resubdivision of these lots, Lot 8 would become 0.802 Acres in size, Lot 9
would become 0.382 Acres in size. and Lot 10 would become 0.380 Acres in size. The
total area under consideration is 1.56 Acres. There are currently no development
proposals for any of the lots. However, statf anticipates that these would be forthcoming
if the minor subdivision is approved.
Frazier-Dahl Minor SubdMsion and Vaiance Bequesl August 13, 2001
1
Variance Request:
Newly subdivided lots in the Two-Family Primary/Secondary Zone District must meet the
lot area and site dimension criteria outlined in Section 12-6D-5 of the Town Code:
The minimum lot or site area shall M fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet
of buildaile area, and each site shall have a minimum frontage of thirty feet
(30').
Furthermore, buildable area is defined as:
"Any site, lot, parcel or any portion thereof which does not @ntain designatd
flood plain, red hazard avalanche area, or areas ln excess of forty percent
(40%) slope."
After red hazard avalanche areas and areas with forty percent (40%) slopes or greater
are eliminated, the total buildable area on Lot 10 is 7,314 sf. Due to the lack of buildable
area on proposed Lot 10, a variance from section 12-6D-5 is required in association with
the minor subdivision reouest.
II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
illnor Subdivision:
The Department of Community Development recommends the Planning and
Environmental Commission approve the applicants' request for a minor subdivision in
accordance with Section lV 0f this memorandum and subject to the following findings:
1. That the application is in compliance with the intent and purposes of the
Subdivision Regulations, the Zoning Ordinance and other pertinent regulations
that the Planning and Environmental Commission deems applicable.
2. That the application is appropriate in regard to Town policies relating to
subdivision control, densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and resolutions
and other applicable documents, environmental integrity and compatibility with the
surrounding land uses and other applicable documents, and etfects on the
aesthetics of the Town.
lf the Planning and Environmental Commission chooses to approve the minor
subdivision, staff requests that the following conditions ol approval be considered:
1. That the minor subdivision shall only be valid if the variance from section 12-6D-5
is also approved.
2. That the applicant shall revise the plar prior to recording, in accordance with the
Town's suMivision regulations, to indicate the total buildable area on each
proposed lot, to delineate the buildable area on each proposed lot, and to indicate
the locations of allapplicable hazards.
Fnzier-Dahl Minor SubdMsion and Variance Request, August 13, 2001
2
I
Variance:
The Department of Community Development recommends the Planning and
Environmental Commission approve the applicants' request for a variance lrom Section
12-6D-5, Town of Vail Code to allow for relief from the buildable area requirement subject
to the following findings:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the
Primary/Secondary Residential Zone District.
There are exceptions or extraordinary setback circumstances or conditions
applicable to this site that do not apply generally to other properties in the
Primary/Secondary Residential Zone District.
There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the
same zone.
III. BAGKGFOUND
The Bighom Subdivision, Second Addition was plafted on July 22,1963. The Board of
County Commissioners of Eagle County approved the platting as the property was then
under Eagle County jurisdiction. Lots 8, 9, & 10 have remained in the current
configuration since being platted.
The Bighom Subdivision, Second Addition was annexed into the Town of Vail pursuant to
Ordinances 13 & 20, Series of 1974. The annexation became etfective on November 5,
1974. Upon annexation into the Town of Vail, Lots 8, 9, & 1 0 were zoned Two Family
Primary/Secondary Residential. At the time of annexation, a residential structure existed
on Lot 9, and Lots 8 and 10 were both vacant. Due to the minimum lot size requirements
of the Two-Family Primary/Secondary Zone District, Lots I & 10 were rendered legally
non-conforming.
Hazard Begulations
In 1976, the Town of Vail contracted with Arthur l. Mears to complete a Geologically
Sensitive Areas Study. For purposes of the study geologically sensitive areas were
defined as snow avalanche, rock fall and debris flow. In response to the findings of Mr.
Mears' study the Town of Vail adopted Geologic Hazard Maps for snow avalanche, rock
fall and debris flow as components of the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan. The maps
were adopted by the Town in 1977.
In 1978, the Town of Vail adopted Hazard Regulations. The purpose of the regulations is
to help protect the inhabitants of the Town from dangers relating to development of flood
plains, avalanche paths, steep slopes, and geologically sensitive areas; to regulate the
use of land areas which may be geologically sensitive; and further to regulate
development on steep slopes; to protect the economic and property values of the Town,
to protect the aesthetic and recreational values and natural resources of the Town, which
Fnzier-Dahl Minor SuMivision and Vaiance Request, August 13, 2001
2.
3.
are sometimes associated with flood plains, avalanche areas and areas of geologic
sensitivity and slopes; to minimize damage to public facilities and utilities and minimize
the need for relief in cleanup operations; to give notice to the public of certain areas
within the Town where flood plains, avalanche paths and areas of geologic sensitivity
exist; and to promote the general public health, safety and welfare.
Town of Vail IaN U* Plan
In 1986, the Vail Town Council adopted the Town ol Vail Land Use Plan. Similar to the
Geologic Hazard Maps, the Land Use Plan is a component of the Town of Vail
Comprehensive Plan. According to the Land Use Plan, Lots 8, 9, & 10 are designated
"low density residential". The purpose of the low-density residential designation is to
provide sites for single-family detached homes and two{amily dwelling units. Density of
development with in this category would typically not exceed 3 structures per buildable
acre. Also within this area would be private recreation facilities such as tennis courts,
swimming pools, and club houses for the use of residents of the area. Institutional/public
uses permitted would include churches, fire stations, and parks and open space related
facilities.
Tlle Town ot Vail Comprelnnsive Open lands Plan
In '1994, the Vail Town Council adopted the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan. The
objectives of the plan are:
. To identify citizen and visitor needs and preferences for a comprehensive system of
open space uses such as parks, recreation, protection of environmental resources,
trails, and to reserve lands for public use;. To prioritize available open lands for acquisition or protection;r To identify creative strategies to implement the acquisition and protection program;. To define a management system to appropriately manage Town-owned open space
lands, and;. To buffer neighborhoods with open space.
The Comprehensive Open Lands Plan is an action-oriented plan that identifies
specific parcels of land that require some kind of action either for protection of
sensitive lands, for trail easements, or for public use. In developing the plan, over
350 parcels were evaluated with 51 parcels on which actions were recommended.
The recommendations were developed utilizing specific criteria to evaluate the areas
ot highest priority. Generally, areas received the highest priority if they met the stated
objectives of the Town and its citizens and were an integral part of the open lands
system. Within the 51 parcels, there are five priority areas made up of a number ol
recommended actions. These priorities are:
. Protect sensitive natural habitat areas, riparian areas, and hazard areas;r Extend the Vail Trail to East Vail and add several trailheads to access the trail;. Add a new trail on the north side and western half of Town to connect existing
trailheads and neighborhoods ;o Add three trailheads" in the core areas to access Vail Mountain trails and inform
visitors of trail opportunities and provide better access to Gore Creek;r Add bike lanes to the north and south frontage roads and add paved shoulders to Vail
Frazier-Dahl Minor Subdivision and Variance Request, August 13, 2001
Valley Drive.
To date, the Town of Vail has taken action on at least 41 of the 51 parcels identified for
action in the Plan. This most recently includes Lot 16 of Bighorn Subdivision, 2no
Addition.
The Action Plan and Priority Plan of the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan identifies Lots
8, 10, and 1 1 , Bighom Subdivision, Second Addition as "Parcel 40" for implementation
purposes. Parcel 40 is classified as a 'High Priorit/'. The high priority classification is
based upon the Town's desire to acquire both the development rights and trail easements
for the proposed South Trail extension. The plan also notes that Parcel 40 is located in a
geologically sensitive area. Strategies for protecting Parcel 40 include purchasing the
development rights, ancl/or acquiring an access easement through the parcel.
As a high priority classification, Parcel 40 meets both Level One and Level Two
Evaluation criteria. Level One Evaluation focuses on meeting community needs relating
to the natural resource system, the recreation system, trails system, and reserving lands
for future civic/public uses. Level Two Evaluation focuses on the availability of the parcel
utilizing criteria such as the threat ol development or irreversible damage, opportunities to
leverage other funds, cost, unusual opportunity with a motivated seller, opportunity for
trade with the USFS, low management requirements on the Town ol Vail and low liability
to the Town.
On Tuesday, July 17,2001, Community Development staff met with the Town Council to
determine the level of interest in acquiring Parcel 40. Due to the prevalence of geological
hazards and the lack of potential lor the development of the South Trail, the Town
Council opted to take no action on Parcel 40. lt was decided that the Town's hazard
regulations and development standards may sufficiently guide and limit development on
Parcel 40 in the future. The Council was amenable to the possibility of acquiring
conservation easements upon Parcel 40 at the discretion of the land owners.
Itevel opment Reg u I a ti o ns
The Town of Vail Zoning Code prescribes the land development regulations for
development within the Town. The following code sections are particularly relevant to the
evaluation of the applicant's proposal:
Chapter 6 - Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential
Chapter 21 -Hazard Regulations
The purpose statement of Chapter 6 (Article D. Two-Family Primary/Secondary
Residential (PS) District) states:
'The Two-Family Primary/Secondary Besidential District is intended to
provide sites for singlelamily residential uses or two-family residential
uses in which one unit is a larger primary residence and the second unit is
a smaller caretaker apanment, tqether with such public facilities as may
approperiately fu located in the same district. The Two-Family
Primary/Secondary Besidential District is inteMed to ensure adequate
Itght, air, privacy aN open space for each dwelling, commensurate with
Fmziar-Dahl Minor Subdivision and Vaiance Rdquest, August 13, 2001
singlelamily and Wo-family occupancy, and to maintain the desirable
residentialqualities of such sites by establishing appropriate site
deve I op m ent stand ard s. "
To date, there are no structures on Lot 8 or on Lot 10. The applicants wish to reapportion
the development potential among these three lots in order to accommodate future
development. There are geologic hazards on this lot including avalanche and rockfall
(see Figures 6 & 7 attached).
The purpose statement of Chapter Z1(Hazard Regulations) states:
'The purpose of this Chapter is to help protect the inhabitants of the Town
from dangers relating to development of flood plains, avalanche paths,
sfeep s/opes and geologically sensitive areas; to regulate the use of land
areas which may be subject to flooding and avalanche or which may be
geologically sensitive; and further to regulate development on steep
slopes; to protect the economic and property values of the Town, to
prctect the aesthetic and recreational values and natural resources of the
Town, which are sometimes assoc,ated with flood plains, avalanche areas
and areas of geological sensitivity and slopes; to minimize damage to
public facilities aN utilities and minimize the need for relief in cleanup
operations; to give notice to the public of ceftain areas within the Town
where flood plains, avalanche areas and arees of geologic sensitivity exist;
and to promote the general public heafth, satety and welfare."
Furthermore, Section 12-21 -1 0 (Hazard Regulations) states:
A. No structure shall be buift in any flood hazard zone or red avalanche
hazard areas. No structure shall be built on a slope of forty percent or
greater except in Single-Family Residential, Two-Family Residential, or
Two-Family Primary/Secondary Besidential Zone Districts. The term
\tructure" as used in this Section does not include recreational
structures that are intended tor seasonal use, not including residential
use.
B. Structures may be built in blue avalanche hazard areas provided that
proper mitigating measures have been taken.
C. The Administrator may require any applicant or person desiring to build
in an avalanche hazard zone ol influence to submit a definitive study of
the hazard area in which the applicant proposes to buikl if the Town's
master hazard plan does not contain sufficient information to
determine if the proposed location is in a red hazard or blue hazard
area. The requirement for additional information and study shall be
done in accordance with Chapter 12 of this Title.
D. The Administrator may require any applicant or person desiring to build
in an identified Aue avalanche hazard zone to submit additional
information or reports as to whether or not improvements are required
to mitigate against the possible hazard. ff mitigation is requhed, said
information and repoft should specify the improvements proposed
Fazier-Dahl Minot SuMivision and Vaiance neques' August 13, 2001
6
therefore. The required information and reports shall be done in
accordance with Chapter 12 of this Title.
The Town has adopted Official Hazard Maps (as described in section 12-21-15:
Restrictions in Geologically Sensitive Areas) which identify areas located within or
potentialwithin rockfall, debris flow, or avalanche areas. SuMivision and/or development
proposals within any geological hazard area requires a site-specific geologic
investigation: According to section 12-21-15:
1. ln any area located within the boundaries of the Lincoln DeVore Map, or in any
area identified as a debris flow or debris avalanche area by the Mears Map, or
in any area identified as a rock fall area by the Schmueser Map, no initial
application for a building permit, grading permit or major or minor suMivision
shall be approved until a site-specific geologic investigation is complete. For
the puryose of this Section, a site-specific geologic investigation shall be
deemed a detailed geologic investigation which is applicable to each
respective site. All repofts and studies required by this Section shall be
prepared by a "professional geologist", as defined by Colorado Revised
Statutes section 34-1-01 , as amended, or a "registered professional engineer",
as defined by Colorado Bevised Statutes section 12-25-102, as amended,
under the direction of and at the expense of the owner/applicant and
submitted to the Department of Community Development.
2. The extent ot the site-specific ecologic investigation required shall be
determined by the geologist or engineer who is responsible for the
investigation; however, the investigation shall be of sufficient thoroughness
and accuracy to allow such expert to ceftify to the following:
a. For all structures otherthan single-family, duplex and pimary/secondary
dwellings, and "accessory uses" thereto as defined in Section 12-6C-4 of
this Code:
(1) Whether the geologic conditions are such that the site can or cannot be
developed for the specific structure or use proposed without conective
engineering or engineered construction, or other mitigation or
alterations.
(2) Whether corrective engineering or engineered construction, or other
mitigation or afterations can or cannot be accomplished to reduce the
danger to the public health, safety or to property due to problems
related to geologic sensitivity to a reasonable level, and not increase
the hazard to other properties or structures, or to public buildings,
rights of way, roads, streets, easements, utilities or facilities or other
properties of construction.
b. For single-family, duplex and primary/secondary dwellings, and "accessory
uses'thereto as defined in Section 12-6C-4 of this Title, the site-specific
geologic investigation shall certify to the following:
(1) Whetherthe site can be developed forthe specific structure or use
proposed without corrective engineering or engineered construction or
other mitigation or afterations; or
(2) That the site is a geologically sensitive area but development will not
Fnzier-Dahl Minor SubdMsion and Vaiance Requast, August 13,2001
7
increase the hazard to other property or structures, or to puilic
buildings, rights of way, roads, streets, easements, utilities or facilities
or other properties of any kid.
In order to provide reasonable notice to the public of the problems related to geologically
sensitive areas, notice regulations and requirements (Section 12-21-15(F)) have been
adopted. One of these requirements is that:
1. All suMivision plats recorded after the effective date hereof shall identify and
designate each lot and block, or portions thereof, located within any
geologically sensitive area, together with applicable suEzone designations, by
a stamp orwriting in a manner providing reasonable notice to intercsted
pafties.
Fpziar-Dahl Minor Subdivision and Variance naquest, August 13, 2001
I
il1.ZONING ANALYSIS
LOT 8, BIGHORN SUBDIVISION, SECOND ADDITION
Zoning Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS)
Existing Lot Size 0.87 Acres (37,888 sf)
Proposed Lot Size 0.802 Acres (34,935 s0
Standard Allowed Existinq Prooosed
Density: 2DUs+1EHU 0
GRFA:
Site Coverage: 7,578 sf
Setbacks:
6,494 sf 0 sf
Front -20 ft. nla
Sides-15 ft. nla
0sf
undeveloped 20,961 sf
undeveloped 33' max
2DUs+IEHU
6,347 sf
6,987 sf
20tt.
15 ft.
1sft Rear- 1Sft.
Landscaping: 22,733 sf
Building Height 33'max
nla
Fnzier-Daht Minor Subdivision and Vaiance Reguesl, August 13, 2001
I
LOT 9, BIGHORN SUBDIVISION, SECOND ADDITION
Zoning Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS)
Existing Lot Size 0.34 Acres (14,941 sf)
Proposed Lot Size 0.382 Acres (16,640 s0
Cunently Standard Allowed Existinq
Proposed
Allowed
Densig:
GRFA:
1DU+1EHU
4,160 sf (+250)
1DU 2DUs+IEHU
4,704 sf (+250)
3,328 sf
20ft
15ft
15ft
9,984 sf
33'max
Site Coverage: 2,988 sf
Setbacks: Front -20 ft.
Sides-15 ft.
Rear- 1sft.
Landscaping: 8,956 sf
Building Heighl 33'max
5he Community Development Department does not have the existing development statistics on file for
Lot 9 because this was constructed in CountY and annexed into the town.
Fnzier-Dahl Minor Subdivision and Variance Request, August 13, 2001
10
LOT 10, BIGHORN SUBDIVISION, SECOND ADDITION
Zoning Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS)
Existing Lot Size 0.30 Acres (12,898 s0
Proposed Lot Size 0.380 Acres (16,553 s0
Cunently Proposed Standard Allowed Existino Allowed
Density: 1DU+1EHU
GRFA:3,650 sf
Site Coverage: 2,580 sf
Setbacks: Front -20 ft.
Sides-15 ft.
Rear- 15ft. *
Landscaping: 7,739 sf
Building Height 33'max *
*Lot 10 is an undeveloped lot.
Fnzier-Dahl Minor Subdivision and vaiance Request, Augusl 13, 2@1
2DUs+IEHU
4,755 sf
3,311 sf
20ft
l5 ft
15ft
9,932 sf
33'max
11
IV. MINOR SUBDIVISION CRITERIA
A basic premise of subdivision regulations is that the minimum standards for the creation
of new lots must be met. This subdivision will be reviewed under Title 13. Subdivision
Regulations, of the Town of Vail Code.
A. The first set of criteria to be considered by the Planning and Environmental
Commission for a Minor Subdivision application is:
Lot Area: According to Section 12-60-5 of the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations,
the minimum lot or site area in the Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential
District is 15.000 sf ol buildable area.
Statt nesp,onsc: Lots 8 and I meet the minimum buildable area requirement.
The total buildable area for Lot 10 is 7,314 square feet. Because Lot 10 was
platted in Eagle County, and did not meet this requirement when the lot was
annexed into the Town of Vail, it became a legally non-conlorming lot. By making
the lot larger, it would actually become less non-conforming. Hence, staff does not
believe that the deficiency in buildable area should have a bearing upon the minor
subdivision request. For further clarification, buildable area is applicable only for
subdivision purposes. The Town Code does allow construction to occur on
slopes greater than forty percent (40%) in the Primary-Secondary zone district.
Frontaoe: According to Section 12-6D-5 of the Town of Vail Regulations, each lot
in the Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential District shall have a minimum
frontage of thirty feet (30').
Sff',tt nesp/ons€.;The proposed lots (Lots 8,I & 10)complywith the minimum
frontage requirement.
Dimension: According to Section 12-6D-5 of the Town of Vail Regulations, each
lot in the Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential District shall be of a size and
shape capable of enclosing a square area 80 feet on each side within its
boundaries.
Sts'lf Reqon*.'Each proposed lot meets this dimension requirement.
B. The second set of review criteria to be considered with a minor suMivision
request is outlined in the Subdivision Regulations, 13-3-4, and is as follows:
"The burden of proof shall rest with the awlicant to show that the
application is in compliance with the intent and purposes ol this Chapter,
the Zoning Ordinance and other pertinent regulations that the Planning
and Environmental Com m ission deems applicable....The Planning aN
Environmental Commission shall review the application and consider its
FrazierDahl Minot Subdivision and Vaiance Request, August 13, 2001
12
Wropriateness in regard to Town policies relating to suMivision control,
densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and resolutions aN other
applicable documents, environmental integrry and compatibility with the
sunouding land uses and other applicable documents, effects on the
aesfnetics of the Town."
The purpose section of Title '13, Subdivision Regulations, is intended to insure that the
subdivision is promoting the health, safety and welfare of the community. The
subdivision purpose statements from 13-1-2 (G) are as follows:
'"To inform each suffiivider of the standards and criteria by which development
proposals will be evaluated and to provide information as to the type and extent of
improvements required."
SE,ff Reqonsc:
Statf believes that the proposal is consistent with the intent and purposes of the
Zoning Ordinance.
*To provide for the suMivision of property in the future without conflict with
development on adjacent land."
Sts,tt Resf,ons€;
The Vail Land Use Plan identifies Lots 8, 9, & 10 as areas for "low density
residential" development. According to the Vail Land Use Plan, the purpose of the
"low density residential" designation is to provide sites for single-family detached
homes and two{amily dwelling units. The density of development within this
category would typically not exceed 3 structures per buildable acre. Buildable
area is defined as that area of a lot outside the 1oo-year floodplain, red snow
avalanche areas and slopes less than 40%.
Development has never occurred on Lots I & 10. Lot I contains a single family
dwelling that was in existence when the Bighorn Subdivision, 2no Addition was
annexed into the Town of Vail. Over the years, the Bighorn Subdivision, First and
Second Additions have been developed in concert with the Vail Land Use Plan as
residential neighborhoods. The area has been zoned for single-family and two-
famiry primary/secondary residential development. A majority of the lots in the
neighboring area are also located within geologic hazard zones. Development on
these fots, as with lots 8, 9, & 10, is governed by the adopted Hazard Regulations
in the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations.
3. "To protect and conseNe the value of land throughout the Municipality aN the
value of buildings and improvements on the lad."
Sla,ft Beqon*:
statf does not believe that the minor suMivision of Lots 8, 9, & 10, Blghorn
Subdivision, Second Addition would have any negative impacts on the value of
land in the Town of Vail. Construction can not occur on a large portion ol Lots 8
Fazier-Dahl Minor SuMivision and Vadance Request, August 13, 2001
1.
2.
13
4.
and 10 due to the presence of red hazard avalanche. Furthermore, the owners of
Lots 8 and 10 have expressed interest in creating a conservation easement to
ensure the preservation ol open space on Lots I and 10.
"To ensure that suMivision of property is in compliance with the Town's zoning
ordinances, to achieve a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among
land uses, consistent with Town development objectives."
SF,ff Beqonsr;
Staff believes that the proposed lot sizes and configurations are consistent with
the development objectives of the Town and the goals of Title 13, Subdivision
Regulations which call tot 'the orderly, efficient and integrated development of the
Town." Furthermore, staff believes that the Town's hazard regulations and
development standards can sutficiently limit the future development of this site.
"To guide public and private policy and action in order to provide adequate and
efficient transportation, water, sewage, schools, parks, pl ayg rou nds, recreation,
and other public requirements and facilities and generally to provide that public
facilities will have sufficient capaci| to serue the proposed suMivision."
Sla,ft Beqon*:
The Town of Vail Comprehensive Open Lands Plan identifies a public purpose
and recreational need for Lots 8, 10, and 11 (Parcel 40), Bighorn SuMivision,
Second Addition. The owners of Lots I and 10 have expressed an interest in
creating a conservation easement to ensure the preservation of open space.
However, even without this easement, the Town's hazard regulations and
development standards can adequately minimize the impacts upon Parcel 40.
"To provide for accurate legal desciptions of newly subdivided land and to
establish reasonable and desirable construction design standards and
procedures."
Sleft Reqon*:
Statf believes that the current proposal satisfies this purpose statement.
To prevent the pollution of air, streams and ponds, to assure adequacy of
drainage facilities, to safeguard the water table and to encourage the wise use
and management of natural resources throughout the Town in order to preserue
the integw, stability, and beauty of the community and the value of the land."
SEtl Reqonse;
Staff believes that the minor subdivision request will not conflict with this purpose
statement.
5.
6.
7.
Fnzier-Dahl Minor SuMiision and Variance Request, August 13, 2001
't4
vt.VABIANCE CRITERIA
A. Consideration of Factors Reoardino the Variance:
1. The rolationship ot the requested variance to other existing or potentlal
uses and structures in the vicinlty.
As proposed, statf does not believe that the requested variance will have any
impact on potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The variance,
however, would allow for two d,velling units and one type ll employee housing
unit as opposed to one dwelling unit and one type 1 employee housing unit
as is permined currently.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and llteral interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achlsve
compatibillty and uniformity of treatment among sites in the viclnlty or
to attain the objectlves of thls title without a grant of special prlvilege.
Statf believes that a degree of relief from the strict and literal interpretation
and enforcement of 12-6D-5 is necessary to achieve compatibility and
uniformity of treatment among sites in this case. By allowing Lot 10 to get
bigger, the degree of existing non-conformity would actually be lessened.
3. Ths effect of the requested variance on light and air, distrlbution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public lacilities and
utilities, and public satety.
Stafl does not believe that the requested variance will have any negative
impacts on the above referenced criteria.
B. The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followino findinos before
orantino a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same
district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the variance is wananted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical ditficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
Fazier-Dahl Minor SubdMsion and vaiance Request, August 13, 2001
15
applicable to tn same site of the vadarne fiat do nd apply generalV
to other properlies ln the same zone.
c. The strict inteFretiation or enforcement of the specifled regulauon
would depdve the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other propenies in the same dlstdct.
' Ftazier-Dehl futnorsuffilon aN Verf,Inc€ Beqtest Augast l3, Znl
16
/J=
sH
s
.o .t T'''ro
E s o (,
q,(/)
c o +'6
--o .so .9s \L o .s .9 dt
o !-l
"6 o
@
u {-o J
-.+ $-,\. cD /
q
Y tr
h
'"l.iti'r1
tne Fri!:e Road and
w e st Lu pi n e Dnva are a. R e d ( h i sh h y'"ry ) "'.' y*r':::"!:Fi :l;::yJ i:li: 3:":2:"Y :;y::
Y,Z{ ;fJX::;';:;:;^i;i":i;il;;;;i;i"i'ii 7eit" tnu" recent construction does not appear
on the maP. ., - ,. ?tn,SCALE: 1"= 100'
MrrroN R. Bnowu
2435 CLINTON ROAD . ROC(FORD,ILUNOIS 5lt(B
July 18, 2001
The Town of Vail
Community Development Department
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Attention: Ann Kjerulf
Dear Ms. Kjerulf:
On two occasions I have discussed with you the subdivision
proposals for lots located on the south end of Bridge Street. lt
seems to me that this particular area is not appropriate for the
construction of residences. The area is very steep as it rises with
the mountain and many of the trees that shape the natural beauty
of East Vail would have to be removed. I would think that it could
also destabilize the land in an already avalanched designated
area.
lwould appreciate it if the Planning and Environmental
Commission would take these factors into consideration.
Very truly yours,
MW
It
ii "
tilrEl
Ei'i
5iil
nii
[li,iii
,[iliili
ttt III ttt
rult ililr
I
l,!qt
I't)
ii ll rl
tl rj ll il il
E
f
E
U
{
t
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ri
;!
ii
lr
E
9
6
i
ti il
rl rl
ttir il
lullffi
rl
il
rtl ll
,ffiI
L
I
t
I
fi r!i
1ilil
ii |l
$
I
| ,,.
illlll
!riii
I
I I
t
I
I
I
t1
il ,il
lfr !l
til$
tso o\\
Fia
iiF 'or S
3":l)[n t!
rH$ F
lr!H
aE $ili s
FH F
SE
QS
!
I I
!
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
l
I
I
t
i
It
il tl hi
!il
it!
ili
llit ;rii
,fi
i'fi
rrill
lillfi
a
I
I
I I
I
I
I ii
tl ti
d
I
I
I
I
I
I
I t
t I
I
lll
fil ill
lilfi$$
iir
lii
iil
ri
!l lr
rll
E I
a
T a i_l_ iI
5
s ,S){E
!r
til
*d?.
8r
a
rl
tt
I , 1..
! ,l..
l.'I ,::r..
I r'll
l: :,:rl:li,
li \ ---
Ro OE
-FA
E= 5
-l {r
a* s
F.':\)[n E,
!H$ F t>*r.
HF: H
xR s ss:ur: d
EH S
$E qs
tl tl
!:
F
o
#
N d''.Y
9
ilh
ill
h'$ti
lit \;,
oqvllo'Ioc'IINnoJ eTsvs TIv Io NtoI
NoI^I.IqOV qNmSS NOISUtgSnS NUOEOIS 0r cNv'E 's sJ01
ilglEffI dVN CIEdVU9OdOL
I
I
c t
,i dI; {c
fii ii ;i!i ii ;i
i[i: is gt
illi il il
EII: 5i EI :t!F :3 :3 9P9t 3e 9e
..,"nre S€
e
P3 gi
B
Iltl
l.-
$F
I l
h
ir r\il
m*r
ffi$ht *
I
lr
!l
tl rl
ti
ti
ll u fl tilft[
s vt d
vt
\-/
"\a \rl I
.n
t
RoCKFALLANDAVAISNGHEHAZARDANALYSISAND
MITIGATION CONCEPTS
Lors a, 10, A.ND 12,. BIGHoRN suBDlvlsloN 2ND ADDlrloN
Prepared For
Mr. Steve Riden
PrePared BY
Arthur L Mears, P.E., Inc.
Gunnigon, Colorado
MaY,2001
ARTHI.JR I. MEARS, P.8., INC.
Nanual Hazards Consultants
555 County Road 16
Gunnison, Colorado 81230
TeVFax:97O-641-3236
artmears@rmii.com
May 10, 2001
Mr. Steve Riden
P.O. Box 3238
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Hazard and mitigation analysis, Lots 8, 10 and 12, Bighorn 2nd Addition
Dear Mr. Riden:
Theana|ysisofhazardandmitigationdesignconceptsyourequestedis
attached. Although "o*" "ipoirre
to the lbove-defined hazards does exist,
.it"_ip""in" mitigition, inctuding fill against back walls or special fences, is
i"".i6f" and cariprobably be iniorporated without substantial expense'
Please contact me if you have any questions'
SincerelY,
n\ rl ,r
W+r,,{lvu\nP
Arthur l. Mears, P.E.
Avalanche-control engineer
Encl: RePort
Moss Wasting ' Avalanches ' Avslanche Connol Enginceing
1 REPORTSUMMARY
The principal conclusions, recommendations and limitations of this study are
detailed in Sections 2 - 6. The summary is as follows.
1.1 Exposure
All lots, proposed buildings and additions considered in this study are within
range oi rocKall and avalanche hazards. These hazards originate within or
directly below the obvious limestone cliff outcropping of the Maroon_formation
approiimately 300 feet above the building sites (Figures 2 and 3). Both rocffiall
and avalanches of sizes sufficiently large to damage buildings are rare events
(estimated return periods of 100 years or longer) but do require mitigation as
discussed.
RECOMMENDED MITIGATION - Mitigation recommended forthe building postfions shown in the
nprit, ZOO| Sfeye Rrden drawings conCrsfs of placing a fitt to a height H against all back walls of
proposed houses. me nil sho;td extend verticalty for a height "H". H = 10'on Lot 8 (upper)' 8'
'on'Lot 8 (lowe\, 10'on Lot 10, and 8'on Lot 12. Surtace slope of fill shotlldPe 1.%: 1. Thiswiil
protect ftom design-magnitucte roc4fal! and avalanches. An aftemate mitigation (a rockfail
energy-absorbing fence) is discussed ln Section 6.
1.2 Mitigation
Because of small velocities and energies of avalanches and rockfall, the
recommended mitigation will consist of fill against the uphill walls of all buildings
as shown in the above figure. The lower section of the walls must be reinforced
for the resulting soil pressure, as determined by the structural engineer. Any
walls and windows on the back walls within 12 feet of grade^should be minimized
in area and reinforced for a horizontal pressure of 100 lbs/ft'. The fill will
dissipate rockfall and avalanche energy such that buildings will not be damaged
and iocks and debris will not be deflected adversely onto adjacent public or
private property. This will protec{ residents and others and will satisfy the Town
of Vail hazard regulations.
T
H 6*
2 OBJECTIVES AND LIMITATIONS
As requested by Mr. Steve Riden, this report has the following objectives:
a. Analysis of the dynamics and resulting hazard from design-magnitude'
rocKall and avalanches on the subject properties;
b. Quantification of the impact and/or static loads on exposed buildings;
c. Recommendations of mitigation procedures that are feasible at or
above the buildings;
d. Discussion of any adverse deflection of rockfall and avalanches onto
adjacent properties; and
e. Discussion of risk.
This report also has the following limitations which should be understood by all
those relying on the results and recommendations:
a. Only rocKall, and snow and debris avalanches are considered; other
hazards or constraints to development, if any, are beyond the scope of
the study;
b. The analysis is based on building locations provided in the Steve
Riden drawings given to me in April, 2001.
c. Any substantial changes to the terrain or forest cover (e.9., by forest
fire or landslides)above the building sites may increase the hazard;
d. Extraordinary events (e.9., with return periods of 300, 1000 years or
longer) may exceed the sizes delineated or analyzed in this report; and
e. The study is site-specific and may not be applicable at other sites.
3 PREVIOUS WORK
The Town of Vail has developed rocKall, debris avalanche, and snow avalanche
maps which indicate Lots 8, 10, and 12 (as well as some adjacent lots) lie within
hazard areas or potential hazard areas. These Vail maps are generalized thus
do not indicate the physical characteristics or destructive potentials of the above
processes. Modifications to these maps based on site-specific analysis and
more detailed study have been provided in Figures 6 and 7 of this report'
Additional site-specific hazard or hazard mitigation studies for Lots 8, 10, and 12
have not been completed since the original Vail studies.
4 TOPOGMPHIC SETTING AND SITE OBSERVATIONS
Figure 1 is a generalized location map of the project area taken from U' S.
Geological Survey topographic data. The approximate location of the rockfall
1 Design-magnitude - Events with retum periods of approximately 100 years. Avalanches do
have return periods because events of one year are not relaled to those of subsequent years,
however, rockfall events may be dependent on events of prioryears.
f,x:t
!o' r $;ir+
{ne t vrcn'rtv map snowing studyirea and approximate-tocation 9! Lo:: e:1?;,-Yt:i:
tocation, avalanches uro ,oiitu,i O"gii primarily bdl6w 8,680 feet elevation level within or below
the limestone ctiffs. Many itne,r ava-tan'ches, debris flows, or rockfalls also occur in the general
vicinity but are not snown on this map. Hazard delineation and subdivision into red and blue
zones are shown in more detail on Figures 6 and 7'
SCALE: 1" = 500'
J-D TopoQuadr Coplright '.0 1999 Delormt Ysrnouth, Mu 0'1096 Sourcc Dutl|r LISGS ft Scnle: 1 :6,000 Dchll: 14 J Dstum: WGS8J
and avalanche area and lot locations are indicated and the generaltopography of
the immediate area is shown. The steep colluvial (rock and debris) slopes below
the limestone cliff shown in Figure 2 is littered with boulders, smaller rocks and
assorted debris. This material results from the combined effects of rockfall,
FIGURE 2. Oblique photograph (taken from the northeast on Agit 27, 2001) of Bridge Road cul'
de-sac and the west end of Lupine Drive. Steep colluvial slopes below limestone cliff band can
produce small-to-moderate sized avalanches. RocWall oiginates w!!!!:![i
FIG:RE 3. Oblique photograph showing greater detail in goiect area (above Lupine Drive and
south of cul-de-saq inA ne iunout area for the rockfatt and avalanches. Very large limeslone
boulders near houses probably originate from glacial activity rather than rocwall.
avalanches, other mass-wasting processes and glacial activity. Much of the
upper Gore Creek valley was the site of extensive glaciation _during the
fl"i.to""n" glacial epoch which ended here 10,000 to 20,000 years before
present. Thi enensive glaciation probably scraped rocks from the cliffs and
deposited many near the present location of homesites as the ice melted.
Alternately, a single or multiple rockfall, rock avalanche, or landslide event(s)
may havaoccurred and deposited these rocks. However, the major boulders,
appear to have been in place for over 1OO0 years, perhaps more than 10,000
ybbrt, judging from soil development and lichen growth on the rock surfaces (see
Figure 4).
FTGURE 4. Major 8-10 foot-tong boulcler in the vicinity of the tower building sre on Lot 8. Boulder
probably reached ffiis position duing or immediately following vailey deglaciation, not from
'rockfat[ lt may have moved into plice from tandstides that occuned afrer valley deglaciation or
ii iiing gtaciat ice. It is untikeiy that this boutder feil ftom the c/ifs as an isolated event
iecauseit-would have rolled mu6h farther or broken into smaller rocks. So/ around the boulder
and lichen cover on the surface suggesfs it has been in the cunent position for at least 1000-3000
years, possibly more than 10,000 years'
Rockfall and debris-avalanches have also occurred since valley deglaciation and
deposited smaller boulders in the vicinity of existing and proposed houses' Such
examples are widespread on the colluvial slope above !"pil" Drive and other
areas within the vallby. An example of a rockfall-deposited boulder is shown in
Figure 5. This 3-foot diameter boulder rests on the soil surface and probably has-
taiten into place during the past several centuries as a result of rockfall' Rocks of
this size have the capability of reaching the proposed houses and therefore
require mitigation. they aie the basis of the rockfall modeling conducted in this
study.
FTGURE 5. Roct<fall4erived boulder approximatety 2'53.0 feet long which fell ftom the lime*one
ctiffs. Notebook is approximately one-toot long. A 3.Afoot diameter rock similar to this one was
used in the rockfail dynamics aialysis and was the basis forthe mitigation recommendations'
5 ROCKFALL AND AVALANCHE MODELING METHODS APPLIED
5.1 Rockfall Modeling
The velocities, kinetic energies, and bounce heights of rocKall events at the
proposed buildings have been quantified through application of the Colorado
ilockfall Simulation Program (CRSP), a stochastic rockfall dynamic_s program
developed by the Colorido Department of Transportation and the Colorado
School of Mines.
The following steps were used in application of CRSP:
a. Rock source areas were identified in the field and through analysis of
aerial photographs.
b. The colluviai slope below the limestone cliff was characterized in terms
of steepness, roughness, and hardness, parameters used in the CRSP
analysis.
c. The sizes of boulders and their probable stopping positions were
determined in the field.
The CRSP model was forced to produce boulder stopping positions as
determined in the field.
Velocities, kinetic energies, and bounce heights at selected analysis
points (positions of mitigation) were determined at the building
locations by the CRSP analysis.
The maximum extent of 3-foot diameter rocks (the design rockfall event) in the
project area is shown on Figure 6. This map should be used to update the
existing Town of Vail rockfall hazard maps which were prepared in 1984.
Complete details of the results of the rocKall-dynamics analysis are provided in
Appendix A. A summary of the design criteria which were used to develop the
rockfall mitigation measures recommended in Section 6 are provided in Table 1.
fhere exisfs a 10% probabitity that the design rockfall event (which is a rare event) will exceed the
criteia.
5.2 Avalanche modeling
Avalanche dynamics were modeled by fitting a three-parameter stochastic model
of avalanche motion to the flow, assuming a starting position at the cliff band and
a stopping position consistent with observed stopping positions observed in
topoliapni6ally similar paths in Colorado. The following two steps were used as
recommended by the Colorado Geological Survey:
a. First the design-magnitude avalanche stopping position was
determined by terrain analysis, observations of prior events in similar
terrain, and statistical modeling;
b. Second the avalanche-dynamics modelwas used to compute energy
(of clear snow and debris avalanches) to determine the red/blue
hazard zone boundary (mapped in Figure 7).
Avalanche velocities computed in step "b" at the proposed buildings were
determined to be 10m/s (22 mph) or less and would produce impact pressures
generally less than 400 lbs/ft2 at the bases of large, flat walls normal to the flow.
Because the apparent avalanche return period at the proposed buildings is more
than 25 years, this would place buildings in the "blue" (moderate hazard) zone,
as indicated on Figure 7. According to the Vail hazard regulations, construction
with mitigation is allowed in such areas.
.{
a
T lble 1. Rockfall criteria for m
Site Velocity Kinetic Energy Bounce Height
Lot 8 building
lgpper)
51.30 fUsec 120.027 ft)bs 7.69 ft
Lot 8 building
(Lower)
39.30 fUsec 74,167 ftlbs 15.51 ft
Lot 10 building 51.07 fUsec 117.046 ftlbs 7.60 ft
Lot 12 building 41.97 fUsec 89.848 ft-lbs 5.85 ft
Note: Mitigation design crtterta are naseA on the 90% cumulative Wobability level, meaning that
FIGURE 6. Map of the maximum extent of rockfail hazard in the Bridge Road and west Lupine
Drive area. Map was produced from aerial photography taken in 1997, thus recent construction
does not appear on the map'
scALE: 1' = l oo'
l
-.:.. ,:
o
'ii:.:;i
$i..1_.
; i.:i r:
6 MITIGATION
Two forms of mitigation from rockfall and avalanches is recommended. These
recommendations are based on the observations and analyses presented eadier
in this report.
6.1 Berms against back walls
The recommended mitigation form consists simply of berms built against the
uphill walls of buildings (Figure 8). These berms must be built to a height of I -
10 feet to dissipate rockfall and avalanche energy. The required heights are
given in Table2.
Table2. Berm desion criteria
Berm surfaces should have a slope of 1lz:1. Walls must be designed to
withstand the static soil load, it being assumed that the impact loads of rockfall or
avalanches will be dissipated by the deformable soil and rock material of the
berms.
FTGURE 8. Rockfa!! and avalanche berms placed against the uphill walls will provicle mitigation
on Lots B, I O, and 12. The required berm heights for vaious locations are provided in Table 2.
Berm surfaces shoutd be at a 1 % : 1 stope. Windows Within the lower 12 feet of the back wall
should be reinforced for a normal pressure of 100 lbsfi(. Berms will not deflect rocks or
snow/debris mirtures onto adiacent public or private Yoryrty.
BUILDING LOCATION BERM HEIGHT
Lot 8 building (upper)10 feet
Lot 8 building (lower)8 feet
Lot 10 buildins 10 feet
Lot 12 building addition 8 feet
o
Windows within the lower 12 feet of the back walls should either be avoided,
minimized in surface area, or reinforced for a pressure of 1OO lbs/ft2.
An alternate form of mitigation, which is primarily used for defense against
rockfall is the energy-absorbing fence (Figure 9).
FIGIJRE 9. Energy-absorbing rockfall fence (manutaclured by GeoBrugg of Sante Fe, NM)
installed above a house neiTetturide. This is a "medium-energy" absorbing fence which would
be capable of dissipating rocks with the design energies above Lots 8, 10' and 12-or
This type of fence has been widely used in Europe and the United States,
primaiity above highway rockfall areas. The medium capacity fence shown in
Figure 9 is approximately 9 feet high and would enst approximately $300-$500
per foot installed. Each fence would be within approximately 50 feet of each
building and would extend the full width of the structure. Modifications to the };
fence design would probably be required in order to withstand avalanche loads.
Although either berms or rockfallfences could be used, the final choice will
depend on cost, environmental disruption, and esthetic considerations. These
choices can be made during the final design stage.
Report prepared by
Qwt^l v\4e,'o
Arthur l. Mears, P.E.
Avalanche-control eng ineer
TECHNICAL APPENDIX A. Rockfalldynamics analysis
The following pages provide input and or.rtput data used in computing rocKall
dynamics parameters at the building sites.
Input File - D:\crsp\Bighorn
o
Lot 8.dat
Input File Specifications
Units ofMeasure: U.S.
Total Number of Cells: 8
Analysis Point X-Coordlnate l: 425
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 2: 481
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 3:
Initial Y-Top Starting Zone Coordinate: 8660
Initial Y-Base Starting Zone Coordinate: 8640
Remarks:
Cell Data
cell No. surface R. Tangent c. Nornal c. Begin x Beqin Y End x End Y
o
CRSP
I
2
3
4
5
6 ,,
8
.)
.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
.J
0
30
150
344
42s
465
481
511
8640
8600
8520
8420
8390
8380
8376
8374
30
150
340
425
465
48r
511
561
8600
8520
8420
8390
8380
8376
8374
8370
CRSP Analysis Point Statistical Analysis - D:\crsp\Bighonr Lot 8.dat
Analysis Point I
Analysis Point 1: X= 425, Y = 8390
Spherical Rock: 3-ft dia., 2333-lb
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 78
Cumulative Probability Velocity (.ff/sec) Energ Ltlb) Bounce Height (ft)
50%
75%
9UYo
95%
98%
33.46 62938
42.85 92994
51.3 120027 56.37 1362s7 62.06 154472
1.61
4.81
7.69
9.42
11.36
Note: Velocity and hnetic energy are analyzed assuming a normal distributron.
Bounce height is analyzed assuming a log distribution.
ro
CRSP Analysis Point Statistical Analysis - D:\crsp\Bighom Lot 8 dam.dat
Analysis Point I
AnalysisPoint LX= 440, Y: 8400
Spherical Rock: 3-ft dia., 2333-lb
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 9
Cumulative Probability Velocity (ft/sec) Energy (ftJb) Bounce Height (.ft)
50%
75Yo
9j%o
95%
98Yo
0.37
2.21
3.87
4.86
5.97
14.2 15351
18.91 23233
23.15 30323
25.69 34579
28.55 39356
Note: Velocity and kinetic energy are analyzed assuming a normal distributton.
Bounce height is analyzed assuming a log distribution.
CRSP Input File - Dlcrqp\Bighorn Lot 8 dam.dat
Inout File Specifications
Units ofMeasure: U.S.
Total Number of Cells: l0
Analysis Point X-Coordinate l: 440
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 2:
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 3:
hitial Y-Top StartingZone Coordinate: 8660
Initial Y-Base Starting Zone Coordinate: 8640
Remarks:
Cell Data
Cell No. Surface R Tangent C. Normal C. Begin X Begin Y End X End Y
I
2
3
4
)
6
7
E
9
l0
{
.5
1.5
1.5
.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
.J
.5
.5
.3
.3
.3
.3
.3
.3
.3
.3
0
30
150
340
425
MO
455
465
481
511
8640
8600
8520
8420
8390
8400
8390
8380
8376
8374
30
150
340
425
440
455
465
8600
8520
8420
8390
8400
8390
8380
8376
8374
8370
481
sll
561
oa
CRSP Analysis Point Statistical Analysis - Dlcrsp\Bighom Lot 8.dat
Analysis Point 2
Aaalysis Point 2: X= 481, Y= 8376
Spherical Rock: 3-ft dia., 23331b
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 44
Cumulative Probability Velocity Lft/sec) Energy (ft-lb) Bounce Height f.ft)
s0%
75%
9jYo
95%
98%
Note: Velocity and kinetic energy are analyzed assuming a normal distribution.
Bounce height is analyzed assuming a log distribution.
24.97 36668
32.52 56410
39.3 74167
43.38 84827
47.95 96792
0.69
8.49
15.51
19.72
24.45
o
CRSP InputFile - D:\crsp\BighornLot 8 dam2.dat
Input File Specifications
Units ofMeasure: U.S.
Total Number of Cells: 9
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 1: 493
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 2: 0
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 3: 0
Initial Y-Top Starting Zone Coordinate: 8660
Initial Y-Base Starting Zone Coordinate: 8640
Remarks:
Cell Data
1
J
4
)
6
1
8
9
.5
.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
.5
.5
.J
0
30
150
340
425
465
481
493
50s
8640
8600
8520
8420
8390
8380
8376
8384
83',16
8600
8520
8420
8390
8380
8376
8384
8376
8370
30
150
340
425
465
481
493
505
s61
cRsP Analysis Point statistical Analysis - D:\crsp\Bighorn Lot 8 dam2.dat
Analysis Point I
AnalysisPoint l:X= 493,Y= 8384
Spherical Rock 3-ft dia., ?333'lb
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 4
Sff/o 8.48 7037
75% - 8.48 7037
0.02
0.7
1.31
1.67
2.08
90%
9s%
98%
8.4E 7037
8.48 7037
E.48 7037
Note: Velocity and kineic enFrgy arc analyznd assuming anormal distribution.
Bounce height is anatped assuming a log di*ribution.
Input File - Dlosp\Bighorn 0.dat
Input File Specifications
Units ofMeasure: U.S.
TotalNumber of Cells: l0
Analysis Point X-Coordinate l: 380
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 2:
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 3:
Initial Y-Top Starting Zone Coordinate: E660
Initial Y-Base Starting Zone Coordinate: 8640
Remarks:
Cell Data
Cell No. Surface R. Tangent C. Normal C. Begin X Begin Y End X End Y
a
I,ot I
.5
.5
.3
.3
.3
,3
,3
,3
.3
.3
8640
8600
8560
8480
8420
8400
8394
8386
8382
8378
o
CRSP
8600
8560
8480
8420
8400
8394
8386
8382
8378
8376
40
ll0
230
360
400
420
465
490
530
570
0
40
110
230
360
400
420
465
490
530
_)
.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
.3
-)
I
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CRSP Analysis Point Statistical Analysis - Dlcrsp\Bighorn Lot l0.dat
Analysis Point I
AnalysisPoint l:X: 380, Y: 8410
Spherical Rock: 3-ft dia., 2333-lb
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 91
s0%
1s%
90%
95%
98%
32.83
42.43
51.07
56.25
62.07
59678
89881
rr7046
133355
151659
1.47
4.69
7.6
9.34
rt.z9
Note: velocity and kinetic energy are analyzed assuming a normal distribution.
Bounce height is analyz-ed assuming a log distribution.
CRSP Input File - D:\crsp\Boghorn Lot l0 dam.dat
Input File Specifi cations
Units ofMeasure: U.S.
Total Number of Cells: 12
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 1: 395
Analysis Point X-Coordrnate 2'.
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 3:
Initial Y-Top Starting Zone Coordinate: 8660
Initial Y-Base Starting Zone Coordinate: 8640
Remarks:
Cell Data
Cell No. Surface R. Taneent C. Normal C. Begin X Begin Y End X End Y
I
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
.)
.5
.J
.J
.3
.J
.J
,J
.J
.J
.t
.J
0
40
110
230
360
380
395
410
465
490
530
570
8640
8600
8560
8480
8420
8410
8420
8410
8386
8382
8378
8376
40
110
230
360
380
395
410
465
490
530
570
580
8600
8560
8480
8420
8410
8420
8410
8386
8382
8378
8376
8375
QRSP Analysis Point Statistical Analysis - D:\crsp\Boghom Lot 10 dam.dat
Analvsis Point I
Analysis Point l: X= 395,Y = 8420
Spherical Rock: 3-ft dia., 2333'lb
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 1l
50%
75%
90%
95%
98%
13.5
17.38
20.87
22.96
25.32
14231
20946
26987
30613
34683
0.35
6.36
1r.77
15.01
18.66
Note: Velocity and kinetic energy are analyzed assuming a normal distribution'
Bounce height is andyzeA assuming a log distribution'
CRSP Input File - Dlcrsp\Bighorn Lot \2.dat
Input File Specifi cations
Units ofMeasure: U.S.
Total Number of Cells: 10
Analysis Point X-Coordinate l: 410
Aaalysis Point X-Coordinate 2:
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 3:
Initial Y-Top Starting Zone Coordinate: 8660
Initial Y-Base Starting Zone Coordinate: 8640
Remarks:
Cell Data
8600
8520
8440
8420
8410
8398
8396
8392
8390
8388
8640
8600
8520
8440
8420
8410
8398
8396
8392
8390
0
35
135
28s
345
375
395
419
456
476
35
135
285
34s
375
395
4t9
456
476
516
I
2
J
4
)
6
8
9
l0
oo
CRSP Analysis Point Statistical Analysis - D:\crsp\Bighom Lot 12.dat
Analysis Point I
Analysis Point 1: X= 410, Y = 8397
Spherical Rock: 3-ft dia., 2333Jb
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 47
Cumulative Probabilitv Velocity (fl/sec) Enerey (ft-lb) Bounce Height (ft)
s0%
75%
90%
95%
98%
46.96
52.56
104497
120937
0.84
3.48
5.85
7.28
8.87
24.43 38322
33.67 65449
41.97 89848
Note: Velocity and kinetic energy are analyzed assuming a normal distributron.
Bounce height is analyzed assuming a log distribution.
CRSP Input File - D:\crsp\Bighorn Lotl2 dam-dat
Input File Specifications
Units of Measure: U.S.
Total Number of Cells: 12
Analysis Point X-Coordimte l: 422
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 2:
Analysis Point X-Coordinate 3:
Initiat Y-Top Starting Zone Coordinate: 8660
Initial Y-Base Starting Zone Coordinate: 8640
Remarks:
8640
8600
8520
8440
8420
8410
8398
8397
8405
8397
8392
8390
I
2
3
4
)
6
8
9
10
1l
L2
0
35
135
285
345
375
395
410
422
434
456
476
35
135
285
345
375
395
410
422
434
456
476
516
8600
8520
8440
8420
8410
8398
8397
8405
8397
8392
8390
8388
OI
CRSP Analysis Point Statistical Analysis - D:\crsp\Bighorn Lot12 dam.dat
Analysis Point I
AnalysisPoint l: X: 422,Y= 8405
Spherical Rock: 3-ft dia., 2333-lb
Total Rocks Passing Analysis Point: 9
Cumulative Probability Velocity (ff/sec) Energy (ftJb) Bounce Height (ft)
s0%
7s%
90%
9s%
98%
7.32 5105
10.67 9729
13.69 13888
15.5 16385
t7.53 19187
0.07
7.28
13.77
17.66
22.03
Note: Velocity and kinetic energy are analyzed assuming a normal distribution.
Bounce height is analyzed aszuming a log distribution.
10
TECHN ICAL APPENDIX B. Avalanche-dynamics analysis
The following pages provide slope profiles and avalanchedynamics analysis
used in determining the loading parameters and design specifications of the
recommended avalanche mitigation.
Avalanche Profile and /y coordinates
Bighom Lot E
Raw Data In feet
X-feet Y-feet
8600
8520
8420
8390
8380
8376
8374
8370
2622 .
2598
2567
2558
2555
2554
2553
2552
44
65
27
13
5
I
15
33.7
27.8
19.4
14.0
14.0
3.8
4.6
Sheetl
Data in meters Segment Data
X-meters Y-melers L-meters Ang - Deg Sum L
0
120
310
395
435
45'l
4E1
531
0
37
95
120
133
138
147
162
0
44
109
137
149
155
164
179
Avg Angle
33.7
30.1
28.0
26.8
26.4
25.2
23.4
Bighom Lot 8 Avalanche Path
2620
= 2600
E
f ruuo
a!i zsoo
lrJ
2540
2520
2500
o 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Horizontal distance (m)
!
\*
-1a D
Page 1
220 particles start frfton segrment.f:e ficles deposited.
c:\pik\bighorn Lot, 8.txt
Path drops: 70 m
Friction mu = 0.35
Log II/D : 2.00
Random R : 0.200
Alpha = 25.3 degrees
O Front stops at X = L46 m
..-*..---.-Front speed (max = tL.l m/ sl
--------.!Iean speed (nlax = l-0.7 m,/s)
-Deposition
(not to scale)
Exit and view distri-butions in your file c:\plk\results.txt
vt{r6H 6'69 PA
vLol, 3. 00
v RAI{6E 5. Aq
V II EAN E. 'I?VSTDEV I. II
IHI6H 8.71 tLot 0. 5s
IRAN6E A. ],4
TIIEAN 5. L6 tstDEv e. 0a
Please note: all v-vanlables
Please note: rll t-variable3
Please note! NP ls number of
AVALAI'ICHE EI{TERl}16 SEGNEilT
UNBER OF PARTICLES II OVI NG
I{UIIBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
IIETERS TRAVELLED FRON START
re sult s
are in neteFs/second.
are in seconds.prrtlcl€s ln packat.
ee0
0
qq
t rril tnAx vllEAl{
0. 55 l. 3? 3. otl
1.37 a.16 3.00
a. 16 :1. 00 3.31
3.08 3.Ee q.35
r.lz q ' bq 5. es
rt . h{ g. rtb L. 0?g,qh b.a? L.aa
t.a? ?.01 ?.ql
?. 05 7. 'll a. o?
?.ll 6.73 6. L0
tiIN tll^x
a. ql 1. l0
t. t0 .1. 40 r.t0 r0.50
10. 50 ll . e0
11. a0 11 . al
rt. a.t le . 5l
le. 51 13 . a.|
13. El 13 . 5l 13.51 rq. Ll
lq . ba 15. 3A
v ll EAl{lt, hE
a. 5a
a. 30
10. r0
10. rrl
r0. 0l tt. 0b tr. 5l rl. 5a
II. IL
tll AX vllEAl{
13.61 f,. 75
th. 7e 6. 36
11, 5q 7 '7E ae'3? r.5r
e5. a0 r. 70
ea. 03 r.6a
30.49 r.?1
33,L6 l.el
rL. 5l 1.51 3t.r{ l.ao
CKE I
a
3
{
E
b
7
6 I
l0
t{P
h .|
lq
I6
e6
30
5tr
NP
164
51
7
q
E
a
3
e
ltP
a
q
3e
5l
AVALAI,ICHE EI{ TERING SE6NE T
NUNEER OF PARTICLES I'IOVING
I{UIIBER OF PAR'TCLES STOPPED
II E'ERS TRAVELLED FROTI START
vHr6H 1q. la VLOU t. ?a
vRAt'l6E 13, 15
v llEAlrl I0. bb
vsTlEv !. l?
tHI6H Ig. 3T tLotd 6. trl
tRAt{6E b. c6
tlr EAN la. 53
TSTDEV 1. 3A
AVALANCHE EI{ TERI N6 SEGNEiIT
NUNBER OF PARTICLES N OVIiIC
NUIIEER OT PARTICLES S TOPPED
NE1ERS TRAVELLED FRON START
PACKET
{
L
7
A
1
I0
e6b
0
t 10
rl
313
0 If?
NP
3
q
t0
5C
Ll{
5t
rta
3a
35
1i
vHI6H la. qe
vLoll 0. tl3
VRANGE }E. BO
vtlEAi ?. EA
VSTDEV a. 5q
tHr6H 11. 3q tLolr lr.llb
tRAr{6E el. 2E
TIIEAN IL. LL
TSTDEV 3. ql
AVALANCHE E[TERTN6 SE6NENT
I{UIIBER OF PARTICLES IIOVIII6
NUIIBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FRON START
PACKET TIIIII r lr.oh
e 13. tl 3 lL. 7e q 11. 5'l 5 e?. 37 L a5. a0 ? 46. 03 r 30. lh I 3!. bl
IO TL.sI
e5L
?E
r50
vr.r16H 1. 73 vLou 0' ll
VRANGE 1' stl
v IIEAN 5.53
VSTDEV I. hL
PACK E T I
a
{
5
tnl tllAx vtlE^l{
Ie.7L rl.La h'otl
13. ha rq. 'rt s.77
Irr . q6 r5. 3q h. hL
15. 3q !h. a0 r ' t3
th. a0 1? . ob L. 03
Page 1
AVALANCHE EII'ERIII6 SEGIIEIIT
ilUNBER OF PARIICLES NOVIIIg
IIUTIBER OT PARTICLES SIOPPED
ETERS IRAVELLED FNOi ITAF'
rHr6H ?1.3?rLou 1?. ?b tRArGE t. hl fllEAl{ l? ' qe
TSTDEV l. ql
VHI6H l. b7 elou 0. {0
VRAI{GE 6' E?
vltEAl{ 4. Et
vsTlEv l. hE
tHl6H aa. {l tLOU 13.5L tRAl{6E 6. 9a
tnEAil 16. aq
ISTDEV l. sl
resultS
r?.0b l?.9a 5. ht t?.5a 1t. ?l 5' 50 lt. ?l 11. Ls {. hl
11. b5 a0' 51 3. t5 E8.51 el.3? 1' 0?
tnAX vllEAll
lq . trs 5. qo
t5. !q q. s?
lb. ?3 {.'13 1?.11 q.L3
lt. 0a tt . al
It..tl q. eq
t9. ao {. e7
a0.Lr 3.23 al.5a a, ?l
aa. qr r. 30
L
6 I
l0
5q
{5
3L
13
e
h
?o?
laq
155
PACKET tTI
r 13.5L a I{. q5
I 15.3{{ th. e3 5 l?. 13 L 1f,.04 ? 11.51 r lt. t0 q 80. El ro al. 5t
ltP I
3
11
ea
31
s3 It
a3
I
3
NUIIBER OF PARTICLES NOVIiIC
iIUIIBER OF PARTTCLES STOPPED
FASTEST PARTICLE SPEED AT FROI{T
FASTEST PARTICLE SPEED ( AIIIU}IERE)
ALPHA a5.3 .leErers
llAL-DEPosIt lha .sters
llltl-DEPoSIT 13? rtters
RAllGLlEPoslT e5 letrr!
NEAil-,EPOSIT I5A TETPTS
STD-DEV-DEPOSIT L ICtENs
Packet i.x(t) llin(i) Partlcles
I rqo I:l? 3{
e I{e rqo 5
3 1q5 lqa h q rq? rq.s lr
5 r50 lq? 1{
h lse 150 ll ? 155 lsa 3A
a r57 !55 r5!
1 lho l5? 5l
10 rLa lho t
0 trt
le. 0 n/s lq.l r/s
@e2
Sheet'l
Avalanche Profile and )dy coordinates
Blghom Lot 10
Raw Data in feet Data in meters Segment Dala
X-feet Y-feet X-meters Y-melers L-meters Ang - Deg Sum L
0 8600 0
70 8560 21
190 8480 58
320 8420 98
360 8400 110
380 83e4 116
425 8386 130
450 8382 137
490 8378 149
530 8376 162
2622
2610
2585
2567
256'l
2559
2557
2555
2554
2554
25
44
44
14
6
14
E
12
12
29.7
33.7
24.8
26.6
16.7
10.1
9.1
5.7
2.5
0
25
69
112
126
132
146
154
166
178
Avg Angle
29.7
32.3
29.4
29.1
26.5
26.7
25.8
24.4
22.9
Bighom Lot 10 Avalanche Path
60 80 100 120 '|40 160
Horizontal distance (m)
2640
2620
2 2600
E
$ zseo
ag
d zsoo
uJ
2540
2520
2500
180
Page 1
120 particleg start rf top segment.zes ]ticles deposited.
c:\p1k\bighorn lot 10.txt
Path drops: 67 m
Friction mu = 0.35
log M/D - 2.20
Random R: 0.200
Atpha = 24.0 degrees
O Front stoPs at X - 152 m
-.*-.-.-.---Front speed (max = 13.5 m/s)
-------.--Mean speed (max = 1-2.9 m/s)
Deposition (not to scale)
Exit and view distributions
in your fl1e c:\Plk\results.txt
results
Please note! 6Il v-varlablas rre in neters/second.
PlEase notrt all t-vrFlables ane in seconds.
Plcase not€: l{P is nunben of penticl.s ln plcket.
AVALANCHE EI{TERt II6 SE6NENT
NUNBER OF PARTICLES NOVI I{6
IIU'IBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FROII START
E
1e0
0
aq
1L5
0
LI
rl
401
0
113
VHI6H ?, IO PA vLoU 3. 00
vRAl,lGE {. t0
vll EAN 5. 05
VSTDEV l. 3?
THIGH L, qq
tl0lrJ tl. 5?IRANGE 5. T7 tnEAN 't. a6 ISTDEV 1, 5t
VHI6H IL. 5O vlou e. e3
VRAI{GE Iq. A1 viEAt{ le.6L
VSTDEV ?. b!
IHI6H 10. 73 tLOU 5. L?tRAN6E 5.0?TNEAN A.I{?tsTlEv 1. rL
vHI6H lb. 5?vLoll !. :l:l
vRAN6E 15. aq
vnEAN lt. 00 vSTDEV 3. et
THIGH IL. ?5 TLOTJ 1.II IRAN6E ?. Lq tnEA la. 51 tsrDEv 1. 51
tnrx
0. 5?
1, !h
t, ?5
?.31
a.9a
3. 5r
q. ot
'I.LA 5.tl
5, AL
PACKEI tNI[I 5. b7 a L. !,7 3 E. LA q ?. rl 5 ?. Ll b 6. a0 ? a. ?L a 1. a!q 5. ?z r0 ]0. a3
PACKET TIIIN I 1. rl e 1. a?3 10. L3 q 1!. {0 5 14. IL I ta. t:r ? 13. Ll 6 t'r.{g I 15. ee lo I5. t[
PA CKE T I
a
3
q
tllAx vllEAl,l
I, rL 3. 00
1. ?5 3.00
a. 33 3. 00
E.'lf: A'ta
3. gt 3. a0
{. 0t rt. {5 q.L6 5.Et
5. a7 5. Er
5. lh !. a7
h. qq h. a3
tnAX vllEAl{E.17 13.{A
L. l[ 10. ht
7. tl rg. r't r
?. Ll 11. tt a.a0 tl.0?
6. ?r ltt , lI
1. er ltt . 00
1. ?? tq. lt
10. af 1{. 6I
r0. ?3 13. Lq
CKET t
a
3
q
L
7 t
I
10
P
q
.|
l1
I3
l5
l?
l6
ct
1{P
tl
q
IA
AL
31
II
r5
fn
l?
AVALANCHE ENTERIN6 SEGNENT
I'IUI' BER OF PARTICLES IIOVI116
UNBER OF PARTICLES SIOPPED
IIETERS TRAVELLED FROIT SIAR T
AVALAI{CHE E]{TERI N6 SE6I.IEIiT
NUNBER OF PARTICLES N OVIII6
NUI.I BER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
NETERS
'RAVELLED
FRON S TART
AVALAI'CHE EI{TERING SEGNENT
NUITBER OF PARTICLES NOVIIIG
NUNBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FRON START
VHIGH 1?, {?VLOU l. Le
VRANGE 15. AO vllE^r{ 1}. !q vSTDEV 3. t 1
tnAX vllEAil
1. 6? 13. e5
10. L3 te. 0t ll. qo te. sa
te. IL tl. ?q
ta. 9! lt. 75
13. L.r 11. 3q l{.q5 t.ea
15. ee L, {q 15.i6 ?.31 !L.?5 L.?0
t,t ti{ tnAx vnEAil
1. 15 r0. ?t ll.5a
10. ?q 1l. h{ 1I.10
11. hrt 1?. qa ta. q6
14. qd 13. fa 11.63 13.3a lq.lL r?.!e
ttt
0 rat
NP
{
3.t
q7
3A
I3
l{
II
3
NP
q
3q
qe
5a
Page 1-
results
tHI6H II. 3L tL0rd l. 15
tRAl{6E 6. qI
tnEAN 13 ' ?1
rsTDEv 1.71
VHI6H 1h.15 PA
vLold 1. 50
VRAN6E 1q. h5
v IIEAN 1,0. ?0
VSTDEV ?. 'IA
tHr6H ll ' 01
tL0td r0. 3?
tRAt{6E 6.7?
1EAN lq. {a
tSTDEV l. 6l
VHI6H IA ' AA vLOu 0. qq
v RAt{6E 11.6q
VII EAil 1.1E
VSTDEV A ' A'
tHI6H AO. A6
tl0t'l I]. 51
tRAltGE 5.31 IEAN ls. qq
TSTDEV l. 11
vHr6H la. tts
vL0l, 0. 5q
VRAN6E ll ' cl
vnEAN 7. 13
vsllEv a. qI
rHr6H a0. 0l
tLol, la ' e0
TRANGE 7 ' AI
U1EAN !.s. ??
ISTDEV 1. eh
lq.th 15.00 ra.06
15. n0 15.lq 6. 0L
t5,6rt lb.bt 6.01
IL. Et l?. 5a l. cts
l?.5e le.3L 6.f5
AA
T5
I5
t5
{
h
6
c
t0
AVALANCHE EIITERING SE6IIEI{T
NUNBER OF PARTICLES NOVI I{6
ilUNBER OF PARlICLES STOPPE'
t'I E1ERS TRAVELLED FRON START
b
aal
7
I3?
PACKEI ININ r 11. 5l a la. q5
3 l3'3f,
{ I'1.5E
! .!5'EE r :,b. a0 1 17.t1 a 16.0?
I lc. 0l
]0 1,1. 15
vllEAl{
ta. 15
lc.ll
la. eq
l0. lr'l
r0. 05
7.5'l
?. qa
7. Ch
?.L3
t|tax vltEAN
ra.'t5 1.65 13.16 1.13
I'{.32 6. 5P
15, aL E. ql
tE.a0 6.11
l?. 13 h. b3
lt.o? q.stl
rl. sl 5. ql
11.55 q.0h
au.66 a.hq
CKET
!
q
q
L
I
I
1D
rnr[ tnAx 10.3? rl. eq
11, ?{ la. ta
12. 1? 14. Cl
}E. 1.1 13. lh 13.!h l'1. 73
1{ . ?3 15. hl
ls. ht ll. 'la lh. q6 l?.35
17. 35 16. aa
1A. aa Il. 01
7
1?b
Lb
lqb
1{P
le
:IL
LO
e?
I1
th
rl
AVALANCHE EI'ITERI NG SEG}IEI{T
I{UIIBER OF PARTICLES IIOVIiIG
TUNBER OF PARTICLES STOPPEI}
NETERS TRAVELLED TRO START
t'tP
h
?A
3t
sb
IL
r{
1
AVALAT,ICHE ENTERING SEGNENT
NUNBER OF PARTICLES IIOVI NG
I{UIIBER OF PARTICLES S1OPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FROII S TART
A
l?q
les
153
5
1
a5a
lbs
PACKET tNI N
r 1?. e0
a le.l'l
3 !3. ?A q lrr. 5?
5 rg. 3h
E th. rt
? :,b, 13
a 17.77 I 16. 5l
10 11. 30
tAX vllEAN
re. rr i. 37
13. 7t l0 ' 35
]q. 5? 6. 1l
15.3b L. 11
lL.lrt 7.qr
r!.1r h.?0
l?.?e q'lh
16.51 q.3q
l.l. 30 s. 00
e0.0q s.15
ilP
tl
f
l3
a3
:13
a9
rrl
q
0 I
AVALAI{CHE ENlERIIIG SE6NENT
NUNBER OF PARIICLES TIOVI NC
I{UIIBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FRON S TARI
VHI6H ?. q5
vLoU 5. e?
vRAl{6E a ' 1l
vnEA[ b ' 1?
VSTDEV O. LI
PACKET I
3
q
Ulrl{ tnAx vll EAl{
lq . !0 1'1. he b. a7
t't . Le lq ' l'l 0. 00
lrt.9q 15.e5 0.00
15.e5 15,s7 5-qo
:l
0
0 I
Page 2
tHI6t{ t7. q?
tlou rq.30 tRAl{GE 3. l?flrEAir 15. tt ISTDEV t. e5
IUNBER OF PARTICLES ITOVII{6
IIU'IBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
FASTES? PARIICLE SPEED AI FRO T
FASTEST PARTICLE SPEED (A'{YUHEiE)
ALPHA aq. 0 degrees
iAX-DEPoSIT lLe rctars Uil-DEPoSIT lel .cter.s
RAT{GE_DEPOSIT qE rrtcPs llEAll-DEPoSIt l5l m.ters
STD-DEV-DEPoSII 1 rrters
5
h
7
6 .|
l0
results
15.5? 15. tl
15. tt tL. tl
lb. er 11. sE
lh, 5a lL. arl
tL . 6rt l?. Ih I?.IE I?. {?
0
ah5 Is'L r/s l7,q rls
0. D0
o. D0
o. 00
b. E0 g, lt
5. 13
0
0
0
a
1
e
Packet I
e
q
5
b
?I
1
10
iex(i) llin(t) Prrticles lr0 leL 5 t3{ 130 Il r31 13rt 15 1q3 Il9 rA lq? lql e1 l5l r{? {e r55 15r qt
1L0 155 5P llq lLo ee lLt rL{ t?
Page 3
Avalanche Profile and x/y coordinates
Bighom Lot 12
Raw Data in feet
X-feet Y-feet
0 8600
100 8520
250 8440
310 8420
340 8410
360 8398
384 8396
421 8392
441 8390
481 8388
2622
2598 39
2573 52
2567 19
2564 10
2560 7
2560 7
2559 11
2558 6
2557 ',t2
38.7
28.1
1E.4
18.4
31.0
4.8
6.2
5.7
2.5
Avg Angle
38.7
32.6
30.1
29.2
29.3
28.0
26.3
25.5
23.8
Sheetl
Data in meters Segment Data
X-meters Y-melers L-meters Ang - Deg Sum L
0
39
91
110
't20
127
't34
146
152
164
0
30
76
95
104
110
117
128
134
147
Bighom Lot l2Avalanche Path
; 2600
tr
! ,uro
.!i zseo
IU
2540
2500
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Horizontal distance (m)
lt"-t I
Page 1
192 particl-es start fJ ton segnent.29? Srticles
dePosited.
c:\plk\bighorn lot 12.txt
Path drops: 64 m
Friction mu : 0.35
log M/D = 2.3a
Randorn R = 0.200
Alpha = 26.2 degrees
O Front stoPs at [ = L26 m
-.-.--.-*--.-Front speed (max = 1"0.7 m/s)
---------Llean speed (max = 1L.7 m/s)
-Deposition
(not to scale)
Exit and view distributions
in your file c:\Plk\results.txt
results
Please note: all v-varlables are in meters/stcond.Please nottr all t-vaniables are in s€conds.Please nots: NP ls number of particles in packet.
AVALAI{CHE EN TERI tI6 SE6I'IET{T
NUNEER OF PARTICLES NOVIiIG
NUNBER OF PARTICLES S TOPPED
IIETERS TRAVELLED FRON S 1ART
PACKE T
e
tl
5
b
A I
IO
z
19e
0
36
t ril
0.51
t. 1t
1.6L
a. sq
3, er
3. Al
5.Er{
5.1?
8.51
3
e\ rl
0
50
PACKET tIII I{t 7.L7 e 7,6b :l 6. I5 q a. h3 5 t. la L t. bl ? 10. 10 A }II. 5A r II. 07 lo Il. 5L
vHr6H 1. A'l vLou 3. oo
vRAl{GE b. 6q
VIIEAN L, IO
VSTDEV ?.11
IHI6H 7.27 tlou 0. 91 IRAN6E L. ?L tnEAN q. tl TSTDEV !.7I
vHICH t5. 5?vL0ld t. f,e
v RAiIGE 13. ?0 V}IEAN I}. EA VSTDEV E. 3L
tlll6H le. oq tLotl 1 . !'l tRAl{6E rt, A?trEAN r0. 0?TSTDEV B.5q
vHr6H ]3. E7 vLold l. f A vRAt{6E t 1,. LA viEAI{ 1.67 VSTDEV ?.13
tHI6H lE. O3 tLOt'J 5. 5A tRANGE h. 5}tnEA ta. 0r TSTDEV I. OL
VHI6H 13. ?3
v Lott 0. 50
VRAN6E IA. A3 vnEAil l. e5 VSTDEV a. ?a
tnAX vllEAt{I,16 3.00 l.cL 3.00
a. 5't 3. 3b 3.er tt.f,e
3. f,1 5. e.l q,5? b.?8
s. Pq ?. 06
5. ra ?, le
L. 51 A. ?a 7."1 1,r{6
ilP
5
a
IA
dI
2q
aa
AVALANCHE EI{TERI I{6 SE6NE T
NUTI EER OF PARTICLES IIOVIN6
NUI1 EER OF PARTICLES SIOPPED
NEIERS TRAVELLED FROI,I S TART
tnAx
7.bL
a. 1.5 t, L3
'1. ld
1. tl
10. l0
]0, 5l ll. 07 It. 5h
la. 0q
vl,lEll{
10. LA lt. 53 c.la
r0. il rl. 30
11.30 lt. eL
r,P, la
13. lB
14.50
l{P
{
I
e3
qt
qt
PA
?t
l0
AVALANCHE ENTERIN6 SE6IIEN T
I{UIlBER OF PARTICLES NOVII{G
NUNBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FROIT START
{
a3.l
AE
lro
PACKET tNIil INAX r 1.54 10.17 a 1,0. l? 10. aa 3 10. ae rl. q?
'r ll. q? te. la 5 ta. te ]e. ?a h la, ?r 13. qt
7 1:t. q3 lq.oe 6 l,q. oa lq. 7s I l{,71 15,36 ro 15.36 lb. 03
vllEAil
1. 5q
r0. 6I
10. ea
r0. ?5 t.c?
1. ?6
L. d.t
0.00
e. g0
1.16
NP
t0
IL
qh
r,th
EL
q?
lq
0
I
AVALANCHE EI{TERIN6 SE6NEilT
NU}IBER OF PARTICLES IIOVIIIG
NUII8ER OF PARIICLES STOPPED
NETERS TRAVELLED FRON START
5
a!t5
3{tll
tnl ttl AX vllEAN 10.3? 1I.51 9. L0 rI.5I ta.h5 t.1l la. L5 13. ?t 1,?7
13. 7l l'{ . 9q t. lb lq.tq ]h.of, 5,Ia
PACKET l
e
I
r.l
5
NP
I6
?3
10
qa
6
Page 1
tHr6H 21. 7i
tLou 10.37
TRANGE }1. $E
tnEAil 13. lq tSTDEV 1. 50
b
7
a
1
results
rh. ol 1?.24
I? . 2e le. 3h
]6. 3h lcl . 5l
rt.5l e0. L5
e0. E5 e1. ?l
3, 05
a. 3b
0. 00
0. o0
r. 16
r
0
0
3
AVALANCHE ENTERIiIG SEGIIENT
NUNBER OF PARTICLES N OVI I{6
NUNBER OF PARTICLES S TOPPED
I,IETERS TRAVELLE! FROI'I START
vHr6H 15 ' 0b PA
vLoltl ?.27
vRAN6E 1e. 71
vll EAI{ 10. h5
VSTDEV ?, 05
tHI6H E3. 5I
tlo!, 11. DL
tRAfiGE I?. 5a
tll EAI'I 13. Eq
tstlEv l. bh
AVALANCHE EN'ERIN6 SEGITEN T
UNBER OF PARTICLES NOVIiIC
NUNBER OF PAR1ICLES S TOPPE'
I'IETERS TRAVELLED FRON START
NAX-DEPOSIT
NIil-DEPOSIT
RAII6E-DEPOSIT
NEAil-DEPOSIT
STD-DEV-DEPOSI T
Packet iax(m) l'l in (m )
I 15 50
e l,0l 15
3 !0L 10r
'{ 111 loL
5 lrh lll
L lee ltE
7 !?7 lea
r 13a ra?
r 1!A 134
I0 ltt3 I3t
PACKET ININ
l ta. 1l a I?. b?
3 }3'rb
{ 13. bq
5 lq. 13
b rq. hl
? 15. Ol
6 r5. 5A .t tL. 0h
!0 th. 55
rrt{ tll^x v IiEAN
11,0h 1?'rl 10'hr
re,3l 13.5? 11.r0
13. s? r{.la 11.07
]q. aa IL. E? 1.?I
rL.0? r?.17 7. ql
L1.12 16. 5? h. q0
1r.5? 11. ta E. qe
rr.aa e}.04 0.00
el. o! ?e. !3 0.00
e?.33 P3.56 b.]a
tllAx vl'IEAN
le. L7 b. s0
t3.rh b.51
lr.Eq b'01
}'t.13 h'01
1rr . bl b. 85
15. 0c 5. ?{
ls. 56 5. q5
rh. 0b q. 3rl
lL.55 3'3b
l?.03 3. aL
h
aqh
3rt
l?h
NP
A5
l3
eq
L
3
0
0
ilP t
1q
ea
l5
3L
3e la
I?
q
ct a
?0
133
CKET
a
3
q
E
h
7
t
I
t0
vHIGH 10. qtt
vLoll 0. '15 vRAl'lGE 1. q5
viEAN 5. E3
vSTDEV 1. 66
tHr6H 1?. 03
tlord le ' I5
IRAN6E q. 6q
tlr EAN r{. sa
tSTDEV 1. 0q
IUNBER OF PARTICLES NOVII{6 I
NUNBER OF PARTICLES STOPPED ?-N?
FASTEST PARTICLE SPEED AT FRONT !I'1
FASTEST PARTICLE SPEED (ANYIdHERE) I5'?
ALPHA aL. a dEgrees
neters
mete r s
meters
meters
m€ Eer s
Particles
7
5
L I
a
z9
ll3
rl rl
fi/s
n/s
lrt3
131
t0
Page 2