HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocuments & Plans - 1990-1992ooz(n
{nco
=oz
!FIv3
{
---
o
tr80 i*
EfrE |; E E
ii= lr ; i' l= -i el=E
=!!r n
=.If o €
='- I o->- d €o@ i; I>= ii o
=6 F Ez fil
q
m
-
o
z,o
;tan
o
z.-{
-t
u
m
T
z
2p-{c
3=
33,
TIt-m
--t
=
l-
c)
9.n-tm
>m
-{>or-u
z
=lt
E
HzH
rrl
E
zH
g
3',do>'r-
z
=m
a)
ts
l:l
lo l;I{ l=lz L-
I\J tEEhl> ll||-tn
tf,blc)Pl=PlO t-)t t.\tztaIt- Hl$'llrll*ltltl
N)
FJ
EtI
Fl=DIplrf,lw tJ)mLlVt'IKtr
Its
tF/trt]trtltllllt
-l
T
5.
IF'
f.J
*lg
lo
l-rlt<l>l-
l:
I
I
I
li|ol{
lz
IIt>l-l!lm'lF,
lz
l-{ rnloEt€Btzlt^K
EFl> ti
I-Hl! F)
FEItrttdIHtalF)tltltltl
Is.
A'
I
ln
E
{
BFl
rq
H
t.
c)H
Hc)
t-{lo
l€
lzlo
llt>
l5lmlo
0z-qmtlrtllolEo|: 'I't4lFot^- 'Tl
-!mp!0
€=F.-t
-{o
@mxm!-l
oz(-
(!a{
m
o)o)
C^)F.
o-O-i6p-A
OOd-<
=FDO8{-(D:ro
xo
=fo!,
--
=t o)
OO
o,ooPo_6'f
tt
=E$E:6'+o)
16'
EL6'o
df<j
6.=gJ
t)Oat -.
Ro"cj:dx=*o
R6x.o
ot(cI
o
oo
3o
{
=
='o
a
qt
_
3E
-{
t
o
f'
A)
oat
l
v,
o
A){I
o
ct
=
6'
u,
o
0)ooo
s
(o
J
{
{
os.o
€
s
t
=.
f
@
s.
='@
o
o
J
c)-
Fz
Fd
-
€
FI
PI<lrl
tllAIzlFJI
I.)l
zlv)l|.lI
olHH
2
=z
mu
o!
-,t1
o,
=mt-
-t
z =z
r
m
-raz
mm
m
l<'
12
IZIfItlr-
la.l-lo
I
ILL
I
l
t[ :
ll'l'
|n
--l
€
(/,
P
ls
i
l-
L
I
z
U'ct-
_loz
-t
!
-lI6
z
rn
cm
aotr=
TF
ZA
.z :
l^t-
z>e8Ion<,.:'| <
>oolm:ao zcz
d
zm€
-im
l
z
iriX
3
z
m
m
_n
z
Otw'@n-4x 1
!!-l;P toF>_n
=zoirqoC)<zuotqIo 62:= c k2q - J
'nzz
€
x
No=
3m=q,r-
,<
=
tz
lFltrq
IFIH
l.ot>
lurllrl
IElFltzI't4kltIt
llal
t:
lz
I
{
oz
=F
F
2ozo-{m
ct>
zz
=-
.{
-i
rn
C- Gl
Eer
ool
F arlzalq9l.:>'
H r-lr!l
I
I
s. l
Iool
\ol,F. I
I
__tl
ml
I
I
I
I
I
:l
z
I
z
F.
30t'
F.
i
r-
mn
=
='n
m
(,
-1
)
am
-t
X
o
m
z
m
mI
z
m
llt€
ln
m
z-n
mFI
=m
z
r
c3
-
tTl|-m |-
z
c)
m
x
-
2o
m
=
tm
=
='Tl
mmU'
VALUATION
3mc)
z
|-
=z
m
m\?
u
.-
c-
z
(rl
3
f,
\)
Tm7
=
=zo
I
I
I
I
Iz
lgr-J
\o
C( nqo u/lftu 74//
lnwn ||al
75 south trontage road
vail. colorado 81657
(303) 479-2L38 or 479-2L39 off lce ot communlty devclopmenl
BU]LDING PERI,IIT ISSUANCE TIME FMIIE
If this permit.lequ'ires a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval,Engineer"s (Pgb]ic wotks) rey'iew and approval , a plannini'Department
review or Health Department review, anb'a review uy itre duiihing -
Departnent, the estimated time for a total review may tafe as i6ngas three weel(s.
All commerc'ial (large or small) and all multi-family permits willnave to toilow the above ment'ioned maximum requirements. Residentia'land.small projects-should take a Iesser amount of time. However, ifres'rdential or smaller projects impact the various above mentioneddepartments, with regard. to necessary review, these projects mayalso take the three week period.
Every attempt will be made by this departunent to expedite thispermit as sgon as possible.
I,. the undersigned, understand the p1 an check procedure and timeframe.
Devel opment Departunent.
ti
75 soulh tronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 479-21,38 or 479-2L39
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
olllce ol communlly developmenl
ALL CONTRACTORS CI'RRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH THE
TOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOP!,IENT
ttARcH 15, 1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING & MATERIAL STORAGE
rn surnmary, ordinance No. 6 states that it is unrawful for anyperson to litter, track or deposit any soil , rock, sand, debrisor material , including trash durnpsters, portable toilets andworkmen velricles. upon any street, sidewaik, a1ley or publicp1?:. or any portion thereof. The right-oi-"uy 3n all Town ofvar.r screet,s and.fgags is approxiurately 5 ft. off pavement.This ordinance wilr be strilhy enforcld by the iown of Vaillyfli-c works Department. pers6ns found vi;raain; this ordinancewlrJ- De glven a 24 hour written notice to remove said materiar.rn the event the person so notified does not coropty witrr {h;--notice within the 24 hour time specified, ttre-puf,iic worksDepartment wirr remove said mateiiat at ine "xte"se or personnotified- The provisions of this ordinance snirr not beapprJ-cabre to construction, maintenance or repair projects ofany street or alley or any utilities in the right_a_way.
To review Ordinance No. G in full , please stop by the Town ofvail Building Department to obtain - copy. rirani you for yourcooperation on this rnatter.
(i.e. contractor, owner)
7-
af
ttlI
F.,,
.,/
'...
t.
6)
$
<,,
{\'$
oo
\r\ o
lf tJ
A.4"
i
Plan Review Based on
the 1991 Uniform Codes
NAMB: SIPF REMODEL
ApDRESS: 3876 LUPINE
VAIL, COI.ORADO
OCCUPANCY: R-3
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V
DATEI 4-8-94
CONTRACTOR: GRAY.S TONE
ARCIIITECT: RIDEN
ENGINEER: NONE
PLANS EXAMINER: DAN STANEK
CORRECTIONS REQTJIRED
The items listed below are not intended to be a complete listing of all possible code
requirements in the adopted codes. It is a guide to selected sections of the codes.
The following is not to be construed to be an approval of any violation of any of
the provisions of the adopted codes or any ordinance of the Town of Vail.
1. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQTIIRED IN ALL BEDROOMS AND TIALLWAYS AS
PER SEC 1210 OF TT{E 1991 UBC.
2. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED BY T}IE TOWN OF VAIL TO CTMCK FOR
CODE COMPLIANCE.
3. VENTTLATION REQITTRED FOR BATHROOM AS PER SEC.1205 OF THE 1991 UBC.
.t
FII.E
A request for lqvariance to allow a deck to encroach into a setback for a residence
located at Loy14l Bighom 2nd Filing/3876 Lupine Drive.
l0)
Applicants: \J Eric and Susan Sipf
Planner: Andy Knudtsen/Mike Mollica
Mike Mollica made a brief presentation per the staff memo and stated that staff is
recommending approval of the requested variance with the condition that the applicant
add plantings on the east side of their residence to help screen the deck from the
neighboring property.
Harry Gray, the applicant's representative, stated they were unaware that the deck had
encroached into the side setback until an lmprovement Location Certificate was done.
Diana Donovan made a motion to approve this request for a variance to allow a deck to
encroach into a setback per the staff memo, with Jeff Bowen seconding the motion. A 6-0
vote approved this request.
A request for a major amendment to SDD #5 to allow for the development of the
remaining portion of the Simba Run SDD, SavoyVillas, located at 1100 North Frontage
Road, more specifically described as follows:
That part of the First Supplemental Map for Simba Run Condominium, according 1o the map ther€of recorded
in the otfic€ of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as follows:
Beginning at the most southwesterly corner of said map, thence the lollowing three courses along the westerly
lines ol said map; 1) NO3"33'01'E 160.79 leet; 2) N12'50'33"E 144.72 feet; 3) N17'56'03" 70.60 leet; thence,
departing said westerly lins, S13"16'03"W 157.26 f€€t, thenc€ S76'43'57"E 91.50 ,eet; thence N13"16'03"E
35.00 feel; thence S76"43'57"E 72.31 teet to the easlerly line ol said map; thence tho following two courses
afong the easterly and southeasterty lines ol said map; 1) S24'44'57"E 52.38leet; 2) S52'50'29'W 272.50 feet
to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.6134 acres, more or less; and
Thal part ol Simba Run, according to the map thereol, recorded in Book 312 al Page 763 in the Oftice ol the
Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as follows:
Beginning at th6 most southerly corner ol said Simba Run, thence lhe following four courses along lhe
southwesterly and northwesterty lin€s of said Simba Run; 1 ) N37'09'31"W 233.28 feet; 2) 334.57 f eet along the
arc of a curve 1o the lett, having a radius ol 1771.95 feel, a central angle ol 10'49'06', and a chord that bears
N42"13'20'E 334.07 feet; 3) N36"48'48" E 201.36 feel; 4) 15.96leet along the arc ot a curve to lhe right, having
a radius ol 428.O2leel, central angle ol 02'08'12', and a chord that bears N37"52'54" E 15.96 feel lo a corner
on the westerly boundary of lhe Firsl Supplemental Map for Simba Run Condominium, according 1o the map
thereof recorded in the otfice ol the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder; thence the tollowing tour
courses along said w€sterly boundary; 1) 521"51'28'W 69.90 teet; 2) S17"56'03"W 181.17 feet; 3) 512"50'33"W
i44.72 leet;4) 503.33'01'W 160.79 feel 10 the southeaslerly line of said Simba Run; thence, along said
southeasterly line, s52.50'29"w .|13.08 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 1,560 acres, more or less.
Applicant:
Planner:
Simba Land CoroorationMalid Said
Mike Mollica
Planning and Environmental Commission
July 26, 1993
COP Y
2.
a
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Communig Development Department
FI!- [ ffOPY
July 26, 1993
A request for a variance to allow a deck lo encroach into a setback for a
residence located at Lot 14, Bighom 2nd Filing/3876 Lupine Drive.
Applicants:
Planner:
Eric and Susan Sipf
Andy Knudtsen
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUEST
The applicant is requesting a side setback variance in order lo allow an existing deck to
encroach into the side setback. The deck was built as part of a maior remodel to the
residence which was recently completed. During the construction process, the deck was
extended into the setback by mistake. At this time, rather than remove this portion of the
deck, the applicant is requesting a variance to make it legal. A variance of 1.6 feet is
necessary to allow the deck to encroach 9.1 feet into the side setback. Decks of this height
may extend 7.5 feet into a side setback.
On October 14, 1991 , the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) approved side
setback variances for two other portions of this structure. The primary reason that the
applicant requested these variances is because the existing structure has a 6 foot side (east)
setback. As part of the remodel, the applicant wanted to add a new entry and a new set of
entry stairs. Both were proposed to be located in the setback and were approved by the PEC.
A key point in the stafl memo of October 14, 1992 was that the proposed encroachments did
not encroach into the setback more than the existing structure. As shown on the attached
drawings, the portion ol the deck, which is currently under review, is flush with the side of the
house and maintains the 5.9 foot setback from the side property line. The survey of the
property prior to the major remodel shows that in this area of the site, a much larger deck
existed. lt not only encroached into the setback but extended across the property line onto
the neighboring lot. At this time, the deck, like the other two encroachments which were
approved prior to the remodel, extends only as far into the setback as the existing house.
ll.ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
Zone District:
Lot Size:
H€ight:
GRFA:
S€tbacks:
North:
Soutt:
Rean
Site Coverage:
Parking:
'Area of requ€stgd vadancs
Primary/Secondary
19,171 sq. tt.
Allowed Exislinq
3l| fe€t 34 ls€t
5,097 sq. ft. 2,925 sq. ft.
Statistics for Maior
ffidRecentv
24 t*l
3,341 sq. ft.
86 ft.
19 tt.
5.9 fr'
87 tr
1,819 sg. tt.
3 spac€s
Front:
Sides:
20 ft.
15 tr.
15 tt.
15 tr
3,994 sq. ft.
3 spaces
r 15 tr.
34 tr.
5.9 ft.
104 ft.
975 sq. fi.
3 spac€s
III. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060 of the Vail Municipal Code' the
community Development Department recommends approval o{ the requested variance based
on the fouowing factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. The relationshap of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity'
Staff believes that the deck as built does not have negative impacts on the
surrounding area. In this area of the site, the deck for this residence no longer
extends offlsite onto the neighboring lot. Staff believes that if this deck area
would have been included in the original variance request, it would have been
supported. Because other encroachments that maintained the existing setback
were approved, this one would probably have been approved' too'
staff does believe that the area could be improved in appearance. we are
re'commending that a cluster of three aspen trees, each 2 inch caliper' and six
o*no, each-s gallon size, be planted between the sipf residence and the
neighboring house near the deck. Staff has discussed this with the owner, and
she has agreed to this.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation
and eniorcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
I
I
t
compatibility and unilormity of featment among sites in the vicinity
or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special
privilege.
Staff cited the location of the existing structure in the previous memo as
justification for allowing portions of the remodel to encroach into the setback. lt
is impodant to emphasize that no portion of the remodel extended further into
the setback than the existing house. Since this is also true with this portion ot
the deck, staff believes that it is appropriate to support this request.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution ot
population, transportation and taffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
Staff belierres there will be no impacts from the encroachment on any of the
issues listed above.
B. The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followino {indinqs
before orantinq a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
pnVilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties ctassified in
the same distdct.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detdmental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is wananted for one or more of the following leasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unneoessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives ot this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the same site ol the variance that do not
apply generally to other properties in the same zone.
c. The stdct interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant ot privileges enjoyed by the owners
of other properties in the same district.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENOATION
Statf recommends approval of the variance as we believe it meets the criteria as discussed
above. ln addition, staff believes the findings were met. Specifically, finding 1 is met, in
staff's opinion, as approval of this request would not constitute a grant of special privilege. In
other cases, pafticularly the previous variance involving this property, staff has recommended
Iapproval based on u1e lact that the existing building is already located.in the setback and the
addition does not encroach further into the setback. Finding 2 is met, in stafl's opinion' as the
,equest would not have a negative effect on public heatth, safety or welfare. Finding 3a is
met, in staff's opinion, as a sirict interpretation of the setback regulation would result in an
,nn"."ur"ry physical hardship. Staff believes that because the house is built 5.9 feet from
the side ptodni line, that requiring the deck to have a greater setback than the house would
i"iuft in i p'racticaf difficutty.
'Based
on this evaluation of the criteria and findings, staff
recommends approval of the variance with the tollowing conditions:
1. Prior to september 1, '1993, the applicant shall plant three 2 inch caliper aspen
trees and six 5 gatton bushes in the area of land between the Sipf residence
and the neighboring residence to the east.
please note that, under Section 18.60.080 of the Town of Vail Zoning Code, the approval shall
lapse if construction is not commenced within two years of the date of issuance and diligently
pursueO to completion, or i{ the use {or which the variance is granted is not commenced within
two years.
c:\p€cvn emos\sipl.72 6
Copy of Building
permit plans
/7\x
Eaa ..E,J1.
?e*,tCe. Ar.4;, !./A4- _\.
, LMr}Jqa
i
WWrartl.*ar.....ur- it'lnil *,ce _,.
/
+.-:-l6dL
"
/',,fr
l ,f, l.d
ffi
Mt
titl
tl I If,-l
-\-.-
ls'
- uor, o,
;\\
"a'\\e-5'
\tt.$; 6
ii',!zli " t .
ti.,. ii .:
,'*-'--t..s€te,/ 7tlt/l
rm
1\
t
6
t
:
r\
..1
b
o,\
'Ze?/_ 4"q*o?*
so.Suruey of propefiy
fuo.prior to remodel.
$
^o
.q;
\,,a----"=-
t:
t'
,. ,:\
i--F.'-;::ii
9l s:3
!:irT
eq!
F
tt
iN.!!ir
ttr.
(D
o
F
t
2nt
I
It:
oQ-drcL-
at-rol!D
(/rb.ctr!
69k-
;
e
>l
ol.1 |
tl
:
o!
;=
-
o
t
Foa
Doo
atn,
.7
,t
u
e-al
,e
cl
FO
rl
an
trt
e8
t<
:r
It
C'
ol
t
ot
IT
5l
c.l
85t
oo
tf
oo
tlart,o
It
t1,a
i.
.. l:
9gE
to
I ic
?n r
g.t
li8
o! n
n rt
ata
all
to
!ol
tt
tol
,a tot
!- t.a
rr t'
,t r
3"t,
9;olg9tl
EoSl
8.'
:,t.
at
att*l
,t-
' o:'
al
an
ti
t
te.
tto
,,i9i< liillr
o !1,
I
,
t
a
a
ts,
L.iti
t!
'(r i
r'
o5
i!
oa
g.
DOat
rE
ta
'ri
ot
rl,
o
I
2
t
c
T
I
a
n
I
E
I!
\l\
{
ss
'{
a
i8
t:
a,t
d
eo at-
t:
'l
{'t-:,.*.
lp
oo
survey of property after remodel. Please
note the new entry staircase and new entry
riiE*:zoq6'o h
+F
aq5
F
t
ail
!Prl
::trE
located in side setback'
ilt.iii
iltil?:t
9.!o
F H s.I ;., -
/P/i5 g
{
[,1
qooo
I
nt
b
2
/^o/ ri],,i /..$a//t >'/o !IPt<
1'3/o/9
l6
(rl61o
|-q
D
?
art
oI
ln
h--------._
l9l.
I
I
t,
HI
I:rl
if,
a
4o"^ t f;'"(!a',i
" {\
(_
?,,,u
1
F
F
:I
<J O
fr -r:t3
9-3
4-r -
/""#fi Lffi
4i{i,-w
Doaurff ;
r s gt 5l E !.t #t tF99t "ro a F ia o t a o t Ft r a t!tsott oJa itr'r-nn!!ta
. or al F na a .'thFF.l a;or Fa ! o rx tlil.?aEi- tB . l.tDttEta o<t i n a rna|" t FFrlo F -* FFFF ltra-atl|.n l}tFttr FtC OOao rF a!ta b4454t1.
tt^--r c F at<o nnnF
3.o'3 3 ..gg8n53"rli9 F. . rrianolto \-xtn, a.tt!at FtriFo trab Itntro|'aiata aI! tlat atntaat9a ra alotn o.tt!nl artt . an ot' : rt t |tilt tboira.. :ll.rl"o t cttotlr-c{' 12,?o" n rtl"I51'9' i *r "8 *95.r. 3 Di ri. : i3 ?t ! ?t,!. F€r B-g,| i'Btl i"gt.n9ri{lF{lli lilliliniii
"-*$'ruu*o{fl$li:' s, Irl!li:gEii
f..::'l';D#&{ii g ia lirii. I gr
-1'S.-'-
-iflrY:€.!99 3 €'9DiilEli..* 5 "P.':45' 5€'o5!'ii'gi o--$ irFhlF . '199 "E"!"ii,:r-*N;i iiiiftiiii",r',rnnnr5f{ ;{ig *ifll9lfgiF
ll* 'i! ii l! illiiirl I
. all i . -, alt .rForta,!r\ oc4 >orooairr,<r
lJl
,(%f
Iti t
'll
I
tu
ss
\'
I.{OI
io
,S
=o?*-A
t|l.o
:o
LtD.{'
ot
{:
oI
i
r\
e
'.t
-4.
o
oIb
0
ro
*'dt*
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUB.JECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
July 26, 1993
A request for a variance to allow a deck to encroach
residence located at Lot 14, Bighom 2nd Filing/3876
into a setback for a
Lupine Drive.
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUEST
The applicant is requesting a side setback variance in order to allow an existing deck to
encroach into the side setback. The deck was built as part ol a major remodel to the
residence which was recently completed. During the construction process, the deck was
extended into lhe setback by mistake. At this time, rather than remove this portion of the
deck, the applicant is requesting a variance to make it legal. A variance of 1.6 feet is
necessary lg allow the deck to encroach 9.1 feet into the sioe@
may extend 7.5 feet into a side setback.
On October 14, 1991 , the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) approved side
setback variances for two other portions of this structure. The primary reason that the
applicant requested these variances is because the existing structure has a 6 foot side (east)
setback. As part of the remodel, the applicant wanted to add a new entry and a new set of
entry stairs. Both were proposed to be located in the setback and were approved by the PEC.
A key point in the staff memo of October 14, 1992 was that the proposed encroachments did
not encroach into the setback more than the existing structure. As shown on the attached
drawings, the portion of rrentlv under review, is flush with the of the
nou line. The survey ol the
property prior to the malb-rrsmodEfshows that in this area of lhe site, a much larger deck
existed lt not only encroached into the setback but extended across_l!_g_-plqpg-ry]ng q!9,
; thc-neighabonngLJot--At this time, thffihments which were
/' approved prior to the remodel, extends only as far into the setback as the existing house.
\--..a-f/
il.
Zone District:
Lot Size:
Height:
GRFA;
Setbacks:
North:
South:
Rear
Site Covarage:
Parking:
'Area of requested vanance
Primary/S€condary
19,171 sq. ft.
Allowed Existing Stetistcs lor Maior
Remodel Completed R€cen0v
24 t€€t
3,341 sq. ft.
86 tt.
19 tt.
5.9 fr'
87 tL
1,819 sq. ft.
3 spac€s
Front:
Sides:
33 to€t
5,097 sq. ft.
20 tL
15 tt.
15 ft.
,rE fl
3,994 sq. tl.
3 spac€s
34 l€€t
2,925 sq. ft,
115 n.
34 tt.
5.9 fr.
104 n.
975 sq. tt
3 spaces
ill.
Upon revlew of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060 ol the Vail Municipal Code' the
Community Development Oepartment recommends approval of the requested variance based
on the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. The retationship of the requested variance to other existlng or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity'
Staff believes that the deck as built does not have negative impacts on the
surrounding area. ln this area of the site, the deck for this residence no longer
extends off-site onto the neighboring lot. Statf believes that I
would have been included in the oriqinal vadan-e request, it would have b9€
otner encroacnments that maintained the existing setback
w6Fappro'ved, this one would probably have been approved, too'
Staft does believe that
recommen at a cluster of three trees, each 2
es and the
neighboring n6ar tn-tne OecX. Staff has discussed this with the owner, and
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation
and enforcement of e specilied regulation is necessary to achieve
B.
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity
or to attain the obiectives ol this title without grant of special
privilege.
staff cited the location ol the existing structure in the previous memo as
justification for allowing portions ol the remodel to encroach into the setback. lt
is important to emphasize that no portion ol the remodel extended further into
the setback than the existing house. Since this is also true with this portion of
the deck, staff believes that it is appropriate to support this request'
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air' distribution of
population, transportation and tratfic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and Public safetY.
staff believes there will be no impacts from the encroachment on any of the
issues listed above.
1.That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially iniurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinitY.
That the variance is warranted for one or more ol the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title'
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the same site of the variance thal do not
apply generally to other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners
of other properties in the same dislrict.
2.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommen variance as we believe it meets the criteria as discussed
above. ln additio\f-es the findings were met. Specifically' finding 1 is met, in
staff's opinion, as approval of this request would not constitute a grant of special privilege. In
other cases, particularly the previous variange involving this property, staff has recommended
before oranlino a variance:
approval based on the fact that the existing building is already located.in the setback and the
addition does not encroach further into the setback. Finding 2 is met, in staff's opinion, as the
request would not have a negative efiect on public health, safety or welfare. Finding 3a is
met, in staff's opinion, as a strict interpretation of the setback regulation would result in an
unnecessary physical hardship. Staff believes that because the house is built 5.9 feet from
the side property line, that requiring the deck to have a greater setback than the house would
resutt in i piacticat ditticutty.
'gaseO
on this evaluation of the criteria and findings' staff
recommends approval of the variance with the following conditions:
Prior to september 1, 1993, the applicant shall plant three 2 inch caliper aspen
trees anTilS gatton bTdh?s in the area of land between the Sipf residence
1.
and the neighboring residence to the east.
please note that, under Section 18.60.080 ol the Town of Vail Zoning Code, the approval shall
tapse lt construction is not commenced within two years of the date of issuance and diligently
pursued to completion, or if the use for which the variance is granted is not commenced within
two years.
c:\pecVnemos\sipt.726
Copy of Building
permit plans
@ W
h.Dl!.lr
^ q --r( ",,
\qru ,)<' )lq'l ,r,(
\4* '
?€ttalza E+.tle *,Aq.- ._..-_-,
' ktt 'a.a7
. L^/,tJt
:1-tXW;)
,/
e.r- l*atL
lI
II ,-.:,
,
f
Survey of property
(oo.prior to remodef .
{
q1
^l
os,
\,,
*"b
;!?iE
4ls22
&i.at&.L
+
n
Di
I
t!
o
r9,
o"ito
tl
,
l-
TT
t2ta
el
F8
rl
83
!a
tln
an9
r99
do I
3Fq
tt taa a
9ltE'
tltrl
tat
o" t
^;89't'1
t:
yt
3n
3r
?oa
.i
!?5'
i9
!a
E
al
ItInIt
B*!i
tt
Ft o
otg.,
I
a ttt
Ftt
,t,
r3.
. a)
lrgl
a E{
Ft a
ct?
ttrt
'orE
I
'a ttt
Ftt
at,
?..ito.tctntao5
a5a
tv,n *t
o tl.
tt,'oltt
Aala!at)
ll a.'
|ttro
11,1i
tc
€9I
rl
lar
tl
;{i
,.1
Ltl
Ji
''i
c
oi
5g
ol
g.
A'at
i3
ta
ot
!.i9
IE'
ota
io t5.'
N7g
i
:l\
t
rio
d
!a
:
F,I
/2
\!
q\
"'-g
3
fI
I
//ll ./
l/1,t/ //
ttIB,/ t;:'- -I l:'lJt-
ll .a
IN
': iti
'i/'
t:
tloIttt
pt
lt
-{a.<<
Lit Iilt I'Fl t
tl
d'-rfr'At li
fii tul
l('l r /
'/''
/::
- -(..- /
t-*;
!':",,"/, ---\
^b
/u I;..'qt
F6ot
/''o/*"
,'-----frten/ 7t/ tl
1
b
F
o
?
r\
;
oI
tl
tt
o
.b
I
o
o
Qsl
:^i
-->
oDPt
I! '{oi
?
tl
|.
qt
r.
{'{:''.*
rtx
rEeeE
rN.
;l!!
i: l;
(D
o
Fc!:
]n
0
oo
survey of property after remodel. Please
note the new entry staircase and new entry
l/ lt
/A
/ C:r-.I li'?
Il , a
IN
located in side setback.
?:
Nt
t\-/
os,
,1'
.:
oi
I
o
6
...8-llt<l
-.r c
l-ii
ts#
8E1ZfEnt'tr
P
Iil
;Frt
;:l;
3.(DI>
9"
@O
'9m
-f
m
J
z
4"- lH/Z.er.'_ 4 I Fo--{S'", I\\ -w/< , I:'ll'--r---'ll\- sfr^ -< \a\-1"---t-. \
{'{-,>. tD--.-
('@
-o
=^|
*
oo
tl:t
.l!
/8
,:
(rl6na
tsc
?ttt
o
In
)-L
taot
o
s
a
6
I
AWI
{rapcad"
:
3
I
g
I
'I
.8 Irt
1
(.
f-
I
!1"
tlr s
5:oqtarol
3fi
a
,F
a|.|=
"t-
ot<n a,
a rt
t a-
!F
E"t
9rtoo
o
at
on
lnn
t'tt
ta<
tnl
l't
ttn
i oo
959
A
tro
in r
5:e
al n
17.
al
!
ca
ot
ot
.tr,
ta
.E
t2td
Ito
oa
l'ca
!ot
to t
l. t
g. tr
ta
! ''E
98 i
gtt
!o
.3
F'tr
gg
t"
<:o
oal
,o
tott
tgtt
nt
at
ca
tl
I.9
t
a
a
oo
ot
o
o
a
tc
n
c
I
c
o
t
l.l
trl
^8
t.t
'rE
nl
It'
:
N
o'o
hiII
I
t
g
I
t
/ ..a/ ..-
/ /..s B/t >r,^ ol"'p/(
-o
/o/9
/o
.i
>
:r
i,
:
*
-t
a
:
o:
rn
?
t,o.{
o
.]
:
orJ
n
z
c:-
a
p
I
#it
Pe
tJ'
t
;
ll .^
-t -
t-.-_.
I t------.-
o
Grfir$'a
I]rl
l
\
$
t
$
f
imtlii
tl
I
Y
i
. .r)':- i--
9'
f
t--.,I
{
_l
t_
I
-7
ultL
a
-J
Iti\./rs
t)
)uE
\0
l
.tl
so
ii
trevised 'r't'tr" O
APPLICATION FOR A \IARTNICE
This procedure is required for any project requesting avariance. The application wiLl not be accepted until a1linformation is subnitted.
BLOCK -,-
,ll.rlJltr, J J
I
$2so.oo PArD / cK # {b35 BY
I Application
PEC I',IEETING
Dare 6')v'13
DATE
A.
R,
/.
NAME oF AppLrc}irtr__-11)e: tu54/ )Pr
/\^.t1 , A I
ADDRESS j\'lt LuDt,{rt Ue
NAME oF AppLrcANT' s REPRESENTATTVE HAtBr, Cen,
/\,\ A - I 'ADDREss P(t (tq 7At /(;^tru<nt to
PHONE t3,7-52,-3t
NAME OF OWNER(S) (type or print)./h 2nne as aboe
PHONE
D,LOCATION OF PROPOSAI,: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: rct-j1b -
E.FEE
THE FEE MT'ST BE PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOP
DEPARTMENT WILL ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL.
Stamped, addressed envelopes of the names of owners ofall property adjacent to the subject property INCLUDING
PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS STREETS, and a list of their
names and mailing addresses. THE APPLICANT WILL BE
RESPONSTBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES.
A pre-application conference with a planning staff member isstrongly suggested to determine if any additional-informat.ion is needed. No application wiIl be acceptedunless it is complete (must include all items required bythe zoning administrator). It is the applicant'sresponsibility to make an appointment with the staff to findout about additional submi-ttal reorri rementq
III. PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION WILL STREAMLTNE THE
APPROVAL PROCESS FOR YOUR PROJECT BY DECREASTNG THE NUMBER
OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING AND
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION (PEC) MAY STIPULATE. ATL
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE COMPLIED WITH BEFORE A
BUTLDING PERMIT IS ISSUED.
FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED:
A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THE
VARIANCE REQUESTED AND THE REGULATION TNVOLVED. THE
STATEMENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS:
1. The relationship of the requested variance toother existing or potential uses and structures i-nthe vicinitv.
F.
II
WNER(S) SIGNATURE (S
A.
ll:#'i:.::"::i:i,::'::::::t:"il'l?'"o' u
specified regulation is necessary to achieveconpatibility and unifornity of treatment amongsites in the vicinity or to attain the objectivesof this title without grant of special privilege.
The effect of the varj-ance on light and air,distribution of population, transportation,traffic facilities, utilities, and publi-c safety.
How your request cornplies with VaiIts
Comprehensive P1an.
A topographic and/or improvement survey at. a scaLe ofat least 1" = 20t stamped by a Colorado licensedsurveyor including locations of all existing
improvements, including grades and el-evations. Other
elemenLs which must be shown are parking and loadingareas, J-ngress and egress, Iandscaped areas and utillty
and drainage features.
A site pLan at a scale of at least ltt = 20, showingexisting and proposed buildings.
AI1 preliminary building elevations and floor planssufficient to indicate the dimensions, general
appearance, scale and use of all buildi-ngs and spacesexisting and proposed on the site.
A preliminary title report to verify ownership and
easemenEs.
If the proposal is located in a multi-family
development which has a homeowners' association, thenwritten approval from the association in support of theproject must abe received by a duly authorized agentfor said associati-on.
Any additional material necessary for the review of theapplication as determined by the zoning administralor.
For interior modifications, an improvement survey andsite plan may be waived by the zoning administrator.
IV. TIME REQUIREMENTS
The Planning and Environmental Commission meets on the2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. A compLeteapplication form and all accompanying material (as
described above) must be submitted a minimum of four(4) weeks prior to the date of the PEC public hearing.
No i-ncomplete applications (as determined by the zoningadministrator) will be accepted by the pl-anning staffbefore or after the designated submittal date.
A1l- PEC approved variances shall lapse if constructionis not commenced within one year of the date ofapproval and diligently pursued to completion.
If this application reguires a separate review by anylocal, State or Federal agency other than the Town ofVai1, the application fee shall be j-ncreased by$200.00. Examples of such review, may include, but arenot l-imited to: Colorado Department of Highhray AccessPermits, Arrny Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
The applicant shall be responsible for paying anypublishing fees which are in excess of 50t of theappli-cation fee. If, at the applicant's requestr dnymatter is postponed for hearing, causing the natter tobe re-published, then, the entire fee for such re-publication shall be paid by the applicant.
z.
I
\ c. )
A.v.
B.
3:ili:li":,of; :T:o"?1.:li.::l'5:il":"I:*:oT3l' o,other issues which may have a significant impact on the
cornmunity may require review by consultants other that
town staff, Should a determinatj-on be made by the townstaff that an outside consultant is needed to review
any appllcation, Community Development may hire anoutside consultant, it shalL estimate the amount of
money necessary to pay him or her and this amount shall
be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the time
he files his application with the Community DevelopmentDepartment. Upon conpletion of the review of theapplication by the consultant, any of the funds
forwarded by the applicant for payment of theconsultant which have not been paid to the consultantshall be returned to the applicant. Expenses incurred
by the Town in excess of the amount forwarded by theapplicant shall" be paid to the Town by the applicant$rithin 30 days of notification by the Tovrn.
f'
a
Ricfrard and Sheila Nords Susan Eileen Kopff C. Stanley and Martha Wilson
3838 Brldge Boad 417 Brentwood Boulevard 5t155 W. Jewell
Vail, CO 81657 Lafeyette, t-A 70503 Lakewood, CO 80232
Neil and Anne Muncastsr Canoll Tyler Karen Barrett
44 S. Holman Way 3877 Lupine Drive 1397 VailValley Drive
Golden, co 80401 Vail, co 81657 vail, co 81657
TlTps- od4eorrs €rrro-xj Qt \
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERW
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vailwill hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on July 26, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1. A clarification of the subdivision process regarding payment of taxes.
Plannen Mike Mollica
2. A request for a minor amendment to SDD #4, Cascade Village for the Waterford
parcels in area A, described as follows:
Thst pan of fie SW lA NE 1l'4, S€cdon 12, Townshlp 5 South. Rang€ 81 W€sl of lh€ Slxlh Prlnc'C Meridian, Town ol VaJl, Eagla County,
Colorsdo, dGcdbsd as toilows:
B€elnnlng at a polnt on the soulho.ly right{t-way lln€ of htsrstal€ Highv{8y tlo. 70 whenca an lfon dn with a dastic cap martlng tho c€nler ol
E6id Seclion 12 beqrs S 33"10'19'W 1447.03 leor; trl€nce aJoog saH south€rly righl-ol-way lin€ Mo courso€
1) N s2"50'2f E 24.66 bor
2) N 74"38'1f E 160.70 le€t:
fieoc€ doparling 6ald south€rly fighl{fvray lins N 88"45'5f E t38.93 toot thoncs S 4C45'14' W 94.32 b€[ lhenc.€ S 18" l8'35- W tl-08 t€.1;
lhonce S 0'1"21S'W 205.02 fo€r:
'|qnca
S 1f0736'W 110.25 b€t; lhen€r S 28"2836'W 164.48 l€€l: thsnc€ N 40 "'17104'W 211.16 f€€l;
lhenc€ N 49'4256' E 97.80 lo€l: rh€nco N 37"09'31'W 95.59 1€€l; lhonce S 5f5O'29'W 55.10 1o€l; h€ncs 69.4S foet along lh€ arc of a non-
langonl curve to th€ l€tl havlnq a radlus o165.00 l€st a canlral anglo ol61'14'42 and a chord fiat boals N 58'55'5y W 66.22 foot; lh€nca N
3f09'31' W 118.50 test To The Trve Polnl of Eeginnlng, Counly ot Eagle, Slal€ ol Colorado:
Applicant: MECM Enterprises represented by Eustaquio Cortina and
Commercial Federal Savinos.Planner: Shelly Mello
3. A request for a minor exterior alteration to allow an expansion to a residential unit at
the Red Lion/Lots E, F, G and H, Block5-A, VailVillage 1st Filing/304 Bridge Street.
Applicant: Aagje NoursePlanner: Jim Curnutte
4. A request for a modification to the conditional use for the snow dump to allow an
expansion of the road located at 1309 Vail Valley Drive/an unplatted parcel located
west of the Town of Vail shops.
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Andy Knudtsen
. A request for a variance to allow a deck to encroach into a setback for a residence
located at Lot 14, Bighorn 2nd Filing/3876 Lupine Drive.
Applicants: Eric and Susan Sipt
Planner:Andy Knudtsen
6.
7.
8.
o
A request to amend the developmenl plan for the Gold Peak Base to allow a building
for restrooms and locker rooms located at Tract F, Vail Village 5th Filing/458 Vail
Valley Drive.
Applicant:
Planner:
Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Tim Kehoe
Tim Devlin
A request for a lolnt worksesslon with the Planning and Environmental Commission
and the Design Review Board for the establishment of a Special Development District
to allow the expansion of the Vail Athletic Club, located at 352 East Meadow Drive,
and more specifically described as follows:
A parcel o{ land in Tract B, Vail Village, First Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, morE panicularly
described as follows:
Commencjng al the Northeast corner of said Tract B; lhence N 79"46'00" W along lhg Norlherly lin€ of Vail
Villags, First Filing, and along lhe Northerly line of said Tract B 622.86 teel; lhence S 0626'52'W a
distance ol 348.83 feel to the Southwost corner ot that parc€l ol land describ€d in Book 19.| at Page .|39 as
recorded January 10, 1966 and liled in Receplion No. 102978 in the Eagle County Becords, said corner also
being tho True Point ol Beginning; th€nce S 79"04'08' E and along th€ Sorth€fly line of said parcel 200.00
tE€l to ths Southsast @rn€r thersof; lhencs N 62o52'00" E and along the Norlherly line of thal parcel of land
descdbed in B&k 222 al PagE 513 as recorded in 1971 in the Eagle County Fecords, a distance ot 66.78
lset lo lh€ Northeasisrly corner of said parcel of land; said corner being on the Weslerly right-of-way line ol
Gore Creek Road, as platted in Vail Village, Fifth Filing; lhencs N 27"13'37' W a distance ot 77.37 leet
afong said W€sterly right-oiway line ol Gore Creek Road; thence N 89"n'22'W a dislanco of 12.80 fe€t 10
th€ North€asterly corner ot thal parcel of land described in Book 191, Page 139 as recorded January 10,
1966 and fil€d in H€ception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records; th€nce Norlhwesterly 26.51 teel along
the arc ol a 37.50 teet radius curve 10 thE lett having a cenlral angle of 40'30'00' whos€ chord bears N
53.40'00' W a dislanc€ of 25.96 teel to a point ot tangency; lhence N 73'55'00" W and along said tang€nl
166.114 feet; thence N 85"10'21'W a distance of 50.40 t€et to th€ Northw€slerly corner of lhe Nlountain
Haus Parcel; thonce S 02"18'OO" W and alorE the east€rly line ol said i/bunlain Haus Parcel a distance of
100.00 fe€t lo ths South€asterly corner thereof; thenc€ S 45"13'53' E a distance of 38.70 teet to the True
Point of Beginning, conlaining 30,486 squar€ feet, more or less.
Applicant: Vail Athletic ClubPlanner: Shelly Mello
A request for a major exterior alteration to allow for a retail expansion at the Sunbird
Lodge, located at 675 Lionshead Place/Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc.Planner: Tim Devlin
A request for the establishment of an SDD to allow the redevelopment of the Cornice
Building and a request for a conditional use permit to allow the conslruction of three
Type lV employee housing units, located at 362 Vail Valley Drive and more specifically
described as follows:
A part ol Tract'B' and a part ol Mill Creek Road, Vajl Village, First Filing, County ol Eagl€, State ol
Colorado, more particulatly dEscribed as follows:
Commsncing at tho Northeast @rner of Vail Village, First Filing; lhence North 79'46'00" West along th€
- r::f -,il ;:,,: i ,'^ i l:!..i.'.,., t,l- a _ ji i-: i Cl .al lC Inr-.i ',^ ii; rJ,-.i'-.,lrl ir-r:'., i'at l;ir'l '-'..1 "n"
lhencE South l0'14'00" Wesl alorE the Easterly line of said Tract'8"; a dislance of 198.31 feet to lhe
Southeast€rly mrn€r ot said Tract'B*; thence North 79"46'00'West along the Southerly line of said Tract
'B' a distance of 100.00 fe€t lo ths trus point of b€ginning thenca Norih 09o10'07'West a distance of 41.67
f€ol; thenco South 88"27'11' W€st a distance ot 75.21 fe€t; thgnc€ Soulh 27"13'37' Easl a dislanc€ ol
77.37 feeu thenco Norlh 57"24'Ocf East a distance of 55.11 teEt, mor€ or lsss lo the true point ol beginning.
Applicant: David SmithPlanner: Jim Curnutte
10. A request for a conditional use permit and a landscape variance to allow an expansion
of the Vail Associates vehicle maintenance shop located at the NW 1/4 NW 1/4
Section 7 and the SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 6, Township 5 South Range 80 W of the
60th P.M.f/ail Associates.
Applicant: Vail AssociatesPlanner: Jim Curnutte
:.
li.
I
l-
Y'', I
/ld:
zrcir/
t1
l" lS
Sld,,, Snno(
oo
4Ce'k
K ,r/r.n''Au{i{p,
,-tl7/
/,/2 ,"
B l/"
\ iqsr ,60,/y Rr(\. j Ua,l , (O erus-t
--s- ni) c -r i)--- (/ -\asan lgfeca k "rf{f\ q/7 8r"rr{,*od/ltr4
B L^J"y"#" L/
@c-!A^/,v {" ,"^7?fql(;r5 ,;, ::^:r" t-u,/r"n
/- /r*,")" 'r6*e/
?r," JQ;Q
{5 Cu g-oiq.l
- Wo:tr t_n ^ \-!(.A/L{t<{'-1-tlew__ - !_u
J-
ar-
PLEASE I'IAKE CHE
TOIVN OF VAIL
DEPART:\{ENT OF Colvl}lt 'ITY DEVELOP}IENT'
;\,lllE
\ / tn (
S.\LES ACT]ON FOR}{
75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD
--{6r_L, C0L0MD0 81657
..,t-::i.iY:.:. :..+:,:..'.::r:i:i
::i :.1^ CCO tJ'l-lT,N
zcra\'G .{'l\D ADDRISS I'i,ris0l c{oo 4 t510
0t 0c-30124t5 LF^TFOR\ { I LTLDL.*G C O D E
UMFOR.\{ PLUI'CNG CODE0l 0000 .{?.{ t5
0l 0000.12.{ l5 | UlrroR-r.t li;cH..u\'icr.L coDE
0l ctolc J 2r I 5 UNIFOfu\{ TTR.E CODE
OI O,]OO I?T I5 I N,\TIO}JAL;LECTilCAL CODE
0l 0000 r 21 15 OT]iER, CODE;OOXS
B LUE FRDTIS O'YIANS)0l ca00{1543
0l 00c'l r2,l l2 >:[.r,ox coPEs / s'iuDGs
0t 00c{{23?t i pt xrl.t:'FEES/R:-NsPEcnoNS
Ot 00CO.i, -1j2 I ;:g,1y f EvtF'V R E.CI-:SCK Ft_t lS:0 FER. tiR.
0t 00co,12321 OFT IiOURS SISPECT]O){ FELs
0l 0004.11il 2 coNTR..' CTORS LICL\5 Es lr.l5
0l c{,00 4 1i30 U ITILK I.EI:J
.01 0000 114) 3 SICN APPLICATIOi{ FEE
ADDITION.\'. SIG}'.'ACE F-E IS],C'J ?;R,
0l 0c0c.{2i-10 lTC A RT FF.OJLCT DOI\ATON
0t 000041.{13
0t 0000 .r r 331 PRE P}JD DFJICN R,!\1g\V !OARD FEE
OI OO]042412 I EUTLITNC-CONSTRUCTION PER}IIT COI"IPUTER DI
*.0I 0000 /+1010 TAX
O1 OOOO 4237I INVESTIGATION FEE (BUILDING)TOTAL DUE:
is C,liipr;re,r'rr oi', n:
I 00'49 r 1330 COI\D('nONAL UsE PERtfl T
OR ALTERA]ION ILE5S0l csol r 1330
0l 0c,c0.11330 EYTERJOiR
^LTi:RAT]CN
II1ORE T]Jr'-\' IC'3 SQ.F|.
SPECIA L D EVELOP}.,1I.YI DI0l 0000 .l I 3
0r 0000 4 )3i0 SPEC!r\L DEvELOP)IE\T Dlsi-RICT ll't^lOR' AM E\
0l 0000 r' l:!i0 SPECLAL DEVILOPTfE}.TT DIS cT ll.lo.joR /'i\{L\l)
tv'lstoN0l 0co?4t3
I ZOVI}\',C CODE r,\,1 L\DNI LvrS
0t 000041330
.k
*
*
)t
*
*
*
*
LLARS
Poiice Receipt Numbers
By
TDhrh"l BF Lr|=It_
l,liEcel I aner:us Cash
fiF-,-r*."1-Ff,1i: 5E: 4.f,
tiE,c* i. F, t. * 1 --F+Srlrlrrc,i*rnl. # ftt # f,$f,5
EEtIr- t'. :--IFF..,t.'tlFtIFtjr::E
Rrrr,:unt t+ncEr*,1 :. i5rl1. fffi
I tFm pEid gmount paid
Lr1 rrrrllrJE+ 1 f,f,FFErJ j-Sii. ElrJ
il-r.rrr,Je r*tlrr-nE,J .i g. tlt:t
THFIF.{}.{ 1/DI.J
'jt,Lr1- '..3--i,i r r ._TEl..ll!JFEhj
.t
J
ooz
@{Fco{ozTm7
={
--I
mHEH I*
=pE l: E E
Hni l* I 3E=i l9 s i
=Qcl lt < 9.iF llq g
.-.-r*l= I :L--JLrrl<J ! 5H r-o 6 €: Yi- I q-;== : e; >= (i oj :6 "' Ee> 6 g
m.0
.NiHrl] fl
5
=oIfr n
=m
I
z
z-{n
o
-.t
c)Oatz t-
3=
d6I
mt-m
-i
=
t-
Ya
vz>m
-l>
u
I
T
=m
--t
t-'t a-3iio>'l-
6)
z
ct
(-
z
3
IT
H
rd
tJ
|l
H
z
zt>l<rt*
IFIH
lc)
trlp"olXI U)
IC
uJl c/)NI Fr,Jlz
la
lFr
lFd
lFd
I
I
I
I
.)B=r<F
fE
t- li.nvt
Y
I
I
Irrlrsl
?l
5\pr-+N9-l
!
K
I
Ft
z
c)
z
FI
-.t
€z
o'tl
t-
tm
z9
{
I
@
t'.J!
I(Jl
FO
z
E
HH
z
ot
=b<F
:. lJitb-tr- r71
r"It!
IX
IluJlN
-q l@-l\ols, l
r9 Irl
r.c Ir-l
I
-{ lJmlOrl=
lll>l=
I'
lm
lF,lzlo
I
I
I
I
I
ldl{lz
lo
lalt<t>
IF
l*
le,
l-r|o
l€
lzlo
l-nt<t>
lFl!tm
P
t7
l-
lc
lz
let<t>
lFl!lm
lolz
9z
;-1
mt-
F)OL-Or!
b<D?Yl,r.J meI
F<\O{\o.l\.) -to
@mxm!I
oz
co
@Lim
, r-drlPad
H(.-.-/ z
a--'t
.fl ;ixr J _Ha l\'--o 14t- l.:I-
I
o-
i6sdoctd'<cL gt
=r.
3S.cO:t CLer tO6io
:afo!)
E_drfo)
OO
.- 0t
g)
=.J
^i 0)
-E0,.l1-:'+i;;*
J(Doo.
6o
=C
df<l
a".-o5roroat, -.oi
=.<;6x=*o
6')
Rd
6s.o:'o.
oo
o
3
=.=
o
=
l
9)
!,
-=
o
qt
€
@
ot
o-
E
CL
=
o
(D
c)
o
=
i
o
(D
€
o
t
=
=
@
5'
o
n,
o
rr
z
rl
g€ClFrOrdz14
F-q td <colm X.v)ZFI. .-l Ol.J Za) F. trt
@zFU)orH5
L,|
-
\,.
o
zi
o
n
-
omt-'lt
z
-tIm
t
{f
f
q,
f
q,
o
ON
i -{< f_'9.X
,.* o,l+e
.. ?'efct
1r S.99.
o)JElado
-rO
O-@
oo.
Y att
(o'
@(ot- )-1 -l>t =et3 :Z |-t ^*l zt>t;igl=\d z
m
m
mo
l-<
12
l=
=l;lr
om
2
:r
c)c--l
X X X x
_0
m
'n
ltm
x t-t-l€t>
1Fl(t
I
I
I
--r
iz
E
F
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
zg,c
l-
--t
z
--{
m
-lI
zm
rcm
rom€
Ii
za
'z
=
I
ll
z>9Rrd!<,-.1 <
>(folm=U'Ozc2f
Itlll
zmt
t-
m
i
z
=z,
t-
?-g
>(
m-o
--l
m
o
I
l-
^z
*ONFgH B=On !.: 'riSF Eo!'{- > .nt-:20rB ?9on 22-f o 64x5< S hHZQu?o 5 6-'nz2a=qJIxF..
ttl I(.')l r$o=El N-=rnl (, r
=ls-Hl /v<.l =I
I
I
I
F
I
:F
u)
FJ
\rl
z
H
f
F;
lElI
F
:l
dtF
Bl
zlFIol
Ftl I-l
FI>l€lFtlzlol
c/: I'l
zz
=6
--t
m
zz
F
@
7
zo
zo
mI
17
I;IEtt{
P(t3tx
l'
IF
HIF!
(/ltectg
F1rcdul."l*Ftoot'dot'!,{l
'qlo>l
f. I r,l
I<luHIOlltz>lE
>terllz
HIF.]olHzlr
IEl'dClf4atFHl3IHr!lHrrl
lHlv)
>FZo
-2
x9ziScl;E
z)
E
\o
\O Fil.J ;<ltn
P.zlrl
H
z
zt
P\t
\o
\o
N)
-{
-{
t-
!m
=
=_tt
mm(
m
-l
;.: rml>!z-
otmt
-r)
jm
azi*
)a
_€
r>t
tn
ff1
-i
z
'71mm
=tno
z
|-
!
c
=qz
mt-m
--t
o
!
z
-m
x
-
z
m!
=
mF3
'..t-n
mmU'
VALUATION
!m!3
-{
2o
H
H
t-
=m
z
l-
_9-
=@z
ml-moi
^
:c
zo
N
FIt
(Jl
N)
o
(,
FJ
NJ\|o
\J N
P"+n ifl- J+ otE=-:,'l
e/ -,/q7 fu
A4lA9l92 LB=25 13ts39494654
'tv
MOI'ROE/NEI€LL EI.IG.
V{iL cslof3rk)
I)tsrcr, Oolor*!$
Monroe & Neq/ell
Brginetrs, Irx:,
April 9, I99Z
Mr. Andy Knudsen
Town of vail?5 South Frontage Roadvail, co 816s7 -
R'e: Slpf Resldence Remodel (UeN #113?)
Gentlemen:
|fter. reviewJ_ng the avalanche,report by Arthur I. ltears Aatlareviaed section ?S1 of the eitesection rill prevent a 300 pounasecond from traveling onto theimpact the all.
The wall is expectecl to susLainwall.
I5_.1:: have any. other_ questions regarcling this or any otherstructural consl-deratlons for the sipf- Residence, pr.easecontact me.
Vary truly yours,
Clal-re ,Jacobi
Engj.neer
c.t/kbf
ec: Mr. Ste\re Rlden
debris and rock fall lrasard.Septenber L6. 1991, we haveret.aJ-nlnE wal1. Thls revl_sed,rock travellng at 20 feet petadjacent property shoutd tt
damage if the rock hite the
004t1 E, Rcrvcr Crcck Blvd. r Suirc.{07 o I', O, Eof, l5g7 o Avr)n, Cr orarlo BI6ZO } (rc,il 949-7768 + pAXG0j') 949-199g
PAGE A3
@n^_ tlp?
,)" Es2
A4/A9132 LA.25 13039494854t MONROE/hEh'ELL ENG,o
UI
rn
C\I6
a_
-*l
$
t
s
atqq,
$$NF[ilFrr
Town of Vail
25 South Frontage Road
Vai1, Colorado 81657(303) 479-2L38
Plan analysis based onthe 1991- Uniform Buil-dinq Code
Project Number z A32092
Address: 3876 LUPINE DR.
Contractor: GREY-STONEArchitect: RIDEN
Engineer: MONROE
NOTE:The code j-tems listed in this report
Iisting of all possible code requirements
selected sections of the code.
Name: S]PFDate: March 20, L992
Occupancy : R3, M1-
Type of Const: V-N
Plans Examiner: DAN STANEK
are not intended to be a completein the 1991 UBC. ft is a suide to
FL NAME AREA MIN.LIGHT MIN.VENT NO.EXITS EGRESS
3 Master bedroom3 Master bath3 Bedroom #13 Bedroom #33 Bath room #23 HaIIs, cl-osets, etc.
TOTAL FOR FLOOR
2 Living room2 Dining room2 Kitchen2 Powder room2 HaIIs, closets, etc.
TOTAL FOR FLOOR
1 Garagel- Unf inished
1 Mechanical room1 Bath room1 Guest bedroom1 Ha11s, cfosets, etc,
TOTAL FOR FLOOR
BUILDING TOTAL
L91
1- 05
1- 81
L70
zbr
99r
498
394
JU)
Z3
L646
484
452
39
190
zrb
L41,4
405r-
10 1n
0.00
l_8.10
17.00
0.00
0.00
49.80
39.40
30 .50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.00
0.00
5 .2so nc,n cn
0.00
24 .90
r_9.70
r_5 .251 qo
1.95q qn
0.00
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
NO
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
NO
1
1_
I
1
l_
t_
z
1
l_
l_
1
1
1
1_
l_
l_
1
1
t_
t_
z
Page 2
FOOTNOTES:1) EGRESS - An operable window or door that opens directly to the exterior
is required from thj-s room, The minimum clear openable area must meet
the folfowing. -- Sec. 1'204,
1) The minimum clear height is 24 inches
2) The minimum clear width is 20 inches
3) The minimum clear area is 5.7 square feet
4\ The maximum siII height is 44 inches
D The number of exits is based on Table 33-A (Dwellings)
3) A mechanical ventilation system may be used in in lieu of exterior
openings for ventilation. -- Sec. l-205. (c)
5) The reguirements for 2 exit.s from the 3rd floor is based on
Sec. 3303. (a) exc. 3.
ROOM DIMENSTONS:
Habitable space shall have a ceiling height of not less than 7 feet 6
inches. Kitchens, haIls, bathrooms and toilet compartments may have a
ceiling height of 7 feet measured to the lowest projection. If the ceiling
is sloping, then Ehe minimum height is required in only l/2 of the area.
--Sec. 1207 . (a)
Every dwelling unit shall have at least one room which has not less than 120
square feeL of floor area. Other habitable rooms except kit.chens shall have
an area of not fess than 70 square feet. -- Sec.1'207.(b)
Habitable rooms other than a kitchen shal1 not be less than 7 feet in any
dimension. -- Sec. L207. (c)
GLAZING REQUIREMENTS:Atl qlazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safetyglazing material . -- Sec. 5406. (d)
1) Glazing in ingress and egress doors except jalousies.
2) Glazing in fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and
panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors.
3) Glazing in storm doors.
4) Glazing in aII unframed swinging doors.
5) Glazing in doors and enclosures for hol tubs, whirlpools, saunasr stean
rooms, bathtubs and shohrers. Glazing in any portion of a building wal1
enclosing these compartmenls where the bottom exposed edge of theglazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet.
6) Glazinq in fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest
exposed edge of the glazxing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical
edge of the door in a cl-osed position and where the bottom exposed edge
of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surfaee.'7) Glazinq in an individual fixed or operable panel, other than those
locations described in items 5 and 6 above, Lhan meeLs all of the
following conditions:A. Exposed area of an individual pane greater than 9 sguare feet.
B. Exposed bottom edge l-ess than 18 inches above the floor.
C. Exposed top edqe greater than 36 inches above the f1oor.
D. One or more walking surfaces within 36 inches horizontally of theplane of the glazing.
8) Glazing in railings regardless of height above a walking surface.
SMOKE DETECTOR REQUIREMENTS :
A smoke detector is required on the ceiling or wall at a point centralLy
located in the corridor or area giving access to each sleeping area.
-- Sec. l-210.(a) 4-
A smoke detector is required on the ceiling or
area. -- Sec. 12L0. (a) 4.
A smoke detector is required on all stories. --If the upper leveI contains sleeping room(s)' a
in the ceiling of the upper level close to the
-- Sec. 121-0. (a) 4
Srnoke detectors are reguired to be wired to the building's power source and
shaLf be equipped with a battery backup. -- Sec. 1210.(a) 3.
Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping area of the dwelling
in which thev are located. -- Sec. 1210. (a) 4.
OCCUPANCY SEPARATION:
Between the garage and the residence, materials approved for thr fire
construction are required on the garage side only and any doors between
the garage and the residence are to be a seff-closing 1 3/8 inch sofid
core-dooi or a 20 minute fire door. -- Table 5-B & Sec. 503- (d) exc- #3
STAIR REOUTREMENTS:
A stairway in a dwelling must be at least 36 inches wide. -- Sec. 3306. (b)
The maximum rlse of a step is 8 inches and the minimum run is 9 inches.
-- Sec. 3306. (c) exc. #1
Provide a handraj-I on one side a stairway 34 to 38 inches above the nosing if
there is 4 or more risers. -- Sec. 3306. (i)
provide a guard rail where drop off is greater than 30 inches. Minimum height
= 36 inches, maximum opening size = 4 inches. -- Sec. 77L2'(a) exc. #1
The minirnum headroom is 6 ft.- 8 i-nches. -- Sec' 3306. (o)
Enclosed usabl,e space under the stairs is reguired to be protected as required
for thr fire-resistive construction. -- Sec. 3306. (1)
SHAFT ENCLOSURES:1) Chutes and dumbwaiter shafts with a cross-sectional area of not more than
9 srrrrare feet marr 'l i norl nn iha i nSide with not feSS than 26 gager eYuur vgalvanized sheet meta] with all joints locklapped. The outside must be
t hr construction, A11 openings into any such enclosure shall be protected
l-rrr nnt lpqq f han a self-r-los-i no solid wood door I 3/8 inches thick orpI LLvv v+vv44^, r
equivalent. -- Sec. 1706. (f)
2) Gas vents and noncombustible piping installed in walls passing through
3 floors or less do noL need to be in t hour shafts.
-- Sec. 1?05. (c)
3) All other shafts are required to be enclosed in a t hour assembfy.
-- Sec. 1706. (a)
wall in each sleeping
Sec. 1210. (a) 4.
smoke detector is required
cl- r 'i rr^rr tru es4! t! gI .
Paqe 4
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS :
For R3 occupancy
THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY. SUCH SURVEY
SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO REQUEST FOR FRAME
TNSPECTION.
ALL CRAWL SPACES WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL ARE LIMITED TO A EARTH TO
STRUCTURAL FLOOR CEILTNG HEIGHT OF 5" BE EARTH FLOOR ONLY/ BE
VENTTLATED AS PER UBC 2516 (C) 6 WITH M]NIMUM ACCESS AS PER UBC
2515(C)2 AND MAXIMUM ACCESS OF 9 SQ. FT.
ANY BUILDING STTE WITH A SLOPE OF 30 DEGREES OR MORE SHALL REQUTRE AN
ENGTNEER DESIGN. SUCH DESIGN SHALL ADDRESS DRAINAGE, SOIL RETAINAGE'
AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN.
EXCAVATTON BELOW SLABS ON GRADE SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WTTHOUT PRIOR
APPROVAL.
ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL BE POSTED PLAINLY VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE
STREET.
For M1 occupancy
SLOPE GARAGE FLOOR TO ALLOW FOR DRAINAGE TO OUTSIDE OR PROVIDE A
FLOOR DRAIN WITH WTTH SAND AND OTL TNTERCEPTOR TO DRY WELL OR TO
SEWER. ANY GARAGE FLOOR DRAIN CONNECTED TO SEWER MUST BE APPPROVED
BY UPPER EAGLE VALLEY WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT.
IN GARAGES WTTH LIVTNG AREA ABOVE, THE WALLS OF THE GARAGE WH]CH ARE
BEARING THE AREA ABOVE SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH ONE HOUR FIRE
RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION. UBC 503(B) .
t.
Town of Vail
25 South Frontaqe Road
Vail, Colorado 8165?(303) 479-2]-38
Plan review based on
the 1991 Uniform Building Code
Project Number: 032092 Name: SfPF
eddiess: 38'76 LUPINE DR. Date: March 20, 1992
Contractor: GREY-sTONE Occupancy: R3'M1
Architect: RIDEN TYPe of Const : V-N
Bngineer: MONROE Plans Examiner: DAN STANEK
# SHEET IDENTIFICATION CORRECTION REQUIRED
1 5 STUCCO ExLerior surfaces with stucco shall be provided with
exterior metal lath as per UBC 4706 with 2 layers of
paper. Windows and doors are required to be
adeguately flashed (not with jusL screed metal) . A
lath inspection is required prior stucco
application.
2 2,3 MECH \rENT A bathroom is required to have an openabLe window or
a mechanical ventilatlon system' -- Sec. 1205' (c)
3 2,3 VENTS fn bathrooms with a tub or shower and in laundry
rooms a mechanical ventilation system connecLed
directly to the outside shall be provided. Bathrns
which contain only a water closet or lav. may be
ventil-ated with a recirculating fan. UBC 1205(c) -
4 2 COMBUSTION In buildings of unusually tight construction (a11
new construction within the Town of Vail)t
combustion air shall be obtained from the outside.
Such combustion air openings sha1I be as per UMC Ch.
6.
5 2 Furnaces not fisted for c]oset or alcove
installation shall be insLalled in a room or space
having a volume at least 12 times the volume of the
furnace. A boiler unit will requj-re a space L6
times larger than the boiler. UMC 504 (b)
6 2 Supply a rnechanical drawing indlcating design of
system, size (BTU and volume) of equipment, vent
location and termination, and eombustion air to be
supplied prior to any installation.
t
2,3t4
2t3r 4
LU Z I 51 4
lL 2t3t4
t2
Page 2
Due to Colorado State Statutesr all sink faucetts
and shower heads are required to utilize flow
restriction devices. A1so, the maximum water closet
flush usage is limited to a rnaximum of 3.5 qallons
per f1ush.
A smoke detector is reguired in Lhe access area to
all rooms used for sleeping purposes. -- Sec.
1210. (a) 4.
A smoke detector is required in all rooms used for
sleeping purposes, -- Sec. 1210. (a) 4.
On an upper level where rooms are used for sleeping
purposes, a smoke detector is reguired in the
ceiling at the stairs. -- Sec. 1210. (a) 4.
A smoke detector is required on a]l leve]s wired to
an alarm in the bedroom area(s). *- Sec. 1210. (a) 4.
A handrail is required along a stairway, It is
required to be 34 Lo 38 inches above the nosing of
the sLeps and if Lhe side is open, the maximum size
of an opening in the railing at the stairway is 4
inches. -- sec. 3306.(i) & 7'712.
A 36 inch high guardrail with a maximum opening of 4
inches is requied where step is greaLer than 30
inches to floor or grade below. -- Sec, I'712.
At eaves and valleys an adequate underlayment sha]l
be provided to protect a structure from ice buildup
and water damage- Two layers of felt sofid moppec
to sheathing and between layers or a commercial
water & ice shield may be used as per ?ab1e 3287.
Because of this project's locationr the foundatlon
is required to be dampproofed to prevent damage to
areas below finished grade. UBC 1,707(d) .
The structure is reguired to be anchored to the
foundataion with I/2 j'nc}:" anchor bolts. The bolts
must be into the concreLe or masonry 7 inches and
spaced a maximurn of 6 feeL apart. See code for
additional requirements. -- Sec. 290?. (f)
Mechanical drawings are required and need to be
approved by TOWN OF VAIL before any mechanical work
can be done ,
13
lo
LI
Proiect Name:
Prolecl Description:
Contact Person and
Owner, Address and Phone:
Legal Oescription: Lot
4zG{ s. {c'//<.:r. C,rt/* , €uOL,u / (A &/ta
Architecr,Addressandphone: ,l/c,x /.(,, Po B+ ?-zzd- {-"/ c,t
/48 erccx / ,r'rine Zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
DISAPPROVAL
i
Sum mary:
E Statt Approval
!
-
t
Iv cklw.nar I 5l o/<-
,./ ha5orfu "
t
.f
ZONE CHECK
FOR
SFR, R, R P/S ZONE DISTRICTS
DATE: Aur-, ZI, t^n,
LEGAL DESCEIPTIoNTGT- 1.I
Trnr/ tlBlock Filing
il L IS<t bactsr,/1pnfu",
38 74.ADDRESS:
OWNER
ARCHITECT
ZONE DTSTRICT
PROPOSED USE
Lrr.r,n.
Q(?- 4, z ,
,t , )t/ t ,-.tl I a,u-'d./ :
-,,.PHONE
PHONE ?qs- /t2 tS / e,.. ,Q .L .n
{./a-+--r -,T /Az-JC2,,^-f
At l.='rnt-r-I-Tu> A-l{rLg F/ar---llLJ
LOT SIZE
Height
Allowed
(30) (33)
Existl-nq
t,o clr^f
Proposed
24',
Total
1rq. -i|.a.*-
t!-,r,a,<h\ rrll* I iL I
)k
ak-
66 fffi|t.
ol.
rE1
0l<
OK
ol<
OK
dk
6K
bk
Water Course
Front.
Sides
Rear
Setback
VIew Corrldor Encroachment:
Envlronmental /Hazards :
201
15'
15'
(30) 1591
nt
slte cover aee zo?ot \1311+- 14a4 [
Landscaping
Retaining Wall lleights
Parklng
Garage Credlt
Drive:
3'/5'
z Reqrd _A_
(30o)[5-D-0n (eoo) (1200, 4-+1 +
dw
,' Ll Flood Plain
'' 2l Percent Slope OY-. - *!+!ntf"-l
^-t.h<oL
, ,fJ
/t),/z il Gco I olr i e Fa z ards
ElJ'T.^loTl)'*\tI'- tUr4,;- o* ?e,A,t'-t'f.t
a)b) Rockfall 7pr-E
,/'c) Debris Flow.t;'4l Wetlands
Does this request involve a 250 Addition? nb
now nucrr of the arlowed zsO Addit,ion is usea-Immls request?
10
rotar GREA tyg,coe x . zG' u,l?. *#ft*;'O4,q1t / .ro -41-'--''
* z'a> - Eoql +
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
/$/ *o,^..*'
z.?_41 6
I nL F'pp;tr4|
P0_t1_l_
qq*/t?
t6tn +
3tu
Permitted Slope 8t Actual Slope
Dabe approved by Town Englneer:
Yes No v-t ???
o.v-.
0n.l 04 ,,rndi
"
to/<-an-c-raac Lur /' t\ t5 J.//-.1
i.
.1r.. ts(qr<s
---GI
mla1-O
l-{ l+ ot<x :t1, Y tlm: 5l9q 1t:v o
lml ot4;f:,ol= -r II-:m=l"r r: 3
o.<
dea9aioctt>Iz-o() I
'ntm
-
az
t-
tru
n!tr
7
4T
8=z\
rr>
r./ >
o
9p-rc3=c)=
^=n
I
=)
e
mrmo-{
=
t-
9.n
-.{ mvz>mof,,--.t >
o
=m
-{
{zm
--
z
3
T
U)H
Erno
z
-
s=3Ho>'t-
m
ITf-r-Yzlol
IFt! l+-r-rl<
t'Ellzlll
IEPlux
i
mr
m
-t
l€
lzlo
:t>
:
m
F'
I H
t€
lzo
l:l>i
m
9)
!
BFIz
H
?
m-m
-to{
lz
loI
-
u
m
f)
TN
Et-t
v
H
3,
F
€z
o
:
-
m
6-)
z
I {
mrm
.\i
I
l{
t€
lzlo.'|
t<t>
t-
lm
lF,lzI
I
F(!
v)H
z
c)
z
F:
q
-{T
tr,
H
z
z
3m
crl
H
€r'
Fz
H
Fd
l-
m
X
u)
I!
f.J
9
Ht.
I
s.
Is.
z
t-()ozo
-{Fco{ozTrrln
={
.I] !Or-
z=
\2
=6)
z.
az
=qrdillrt\)bRF'YbiF"o|-n
!m],
=--t
-.1o
@mxmT-{
z
c.o
(DI-{m
C'
Cr)(^)
E;$s$
€1cF[<-;"fo Y =nJ o.:=;
E F
3*=B€
= (o O gJ
Fb =o -
=5i.3-g'"9 s 3frOO^,(/rX
!;.g t ;o*oXo)
a O a iii.'. i =9 9t9.\;?D-X'NX'u-=+i5
iDsd a: {"\r\=> ^ J :.\r\s-i x t -
, oN-\. = Y =!- =:Eia-Q -{ 5..=96\.iiE
= e g
|
-.-=\-_.J =\\ \* \-rs -.
w+\ SEB;3:
)q*fi*+/ fl:lets/ e u 9P
='
EPi>NmcXm:$! t\\
dz
m],
o
'no
-
mt--n
lmt<l'
I
II
iI
I
'tt>t*
l3
I
II
l-
I
@
:z -r=oz
t-
_9
m
=ozmmt-t
m
l-<
lz
12
t>lr-
fio<!'n-o
<a lm
> lo"l
I
I
t rn
J
€
U'
IF
IHI
III
I
I
za
r-
=z
'tt
m
-lIo
z
m
c
m
I
I
IOT€
I;
zc)
'z t
tl
I
I
I
l
z>e8Io2<+<
>oolm:!@o zcz
(t)
I
L
ll
zm
=
m
--l
z
5
=z
m_9
-.1
-0
m
fr
c
n
I
--t
z
-O N F
o=^ E=:{r, !l r;
=F E otF > 'nF; Z 62e ?9D3 2 2<f o 6 456 = S bE2 <n - --{
_'nzz:€
31
I'l F >' -..lBo @ =18u' m
=lFelz17- @f")lg 3-
F'
I
I
I
€
o
z
2
F
-Iz
zo-t
m6
--{m
l-' l
zttol,
Tti
6r!
>.;r-l'
I
I
I
i
r.lI
I
l(
ol
--llml
I
I
I
I
a
a:l
4
\)
t-
TmI
=---t
'Tt
mm
at,
m
x
.)
m
z
c
m
mL
z
m
m€
m
m
--t
oz-n
mm
=m
z
c3
@z
m
m
--t
^
f-
z
Imox
I
zo
=I
m
=TImm(n
VALUATION
Tmv3
=2o
rn
-
z
c)
..
-0
=
2c)
ma'm
-i
t-
(D
Foz
NJ
N.)
d('l
I\{
NI
5'
I'tl
S
$r
8,#r5"aee5x' *
lFrnrr ursPEsrrox'l cosr.rrro O
fhe lterg belov aced to be coqlcte before
glvl.ng a peral.t s f{nrt. C of O.
Pleaee checl off Lo tbe bor provl.iled.
EINAL PLI'UBING
PINAI. IIBCEAilIC T.
tl
tl
DATE:
tr FINAI. ELECTRICAT.
tt^|IF.
TEI{PORARY C OF O
DATE:
ftl: ft4ryut /u/t</rq
l-,
tl| | ceRtrtrrclrE or occuPANcY
FIIJE HAUE:
i lnlv"
l)'?
-T( o
y'/*,* /
rt rr /t^A( ltrip
A sEa 4
/*J
.&.
e.4tLfaA'
/t- or"r-"-
ttxeu,'rO
4{ ,,4.
irtri{l DYi XE|IUX leleC0pref 701?;10-20-92 ; 8:?zAl\{ i
ARTHURI. MEARS, P.E.,
Nrnrnl Ha:gdr Corrrultgrq
?22 Egt Gotlrx Ava
G'miron, Cdondo 81230
30t - 641-1216
303?380382-.
INC.
CCITT C3i# 2
Ric'Docr 211992
RE: Sipf Rernodel, 3876 Lupin€ Drlve, VaiI. Avalancher &bLiE
flow and Rockfall conEiderations'
Dear Mr. niden-l
In response t,o your request, I have conpleted an. evaluation of
i"aiu"Eflu, debrie flow, end rockfall hazards to the above-
re.ferenced Property. ihe objectlveE of rny evaluatlon are:
a.TodeterrntnetheexpoEurBandpotentlalhazardiand
b.Toiieternineiftheproposedrenodet(asspec.ifiedin your drawings of 8-25-91i wtll deflect avalanche or
rockfall onto adjacent ProPertY'
CONCLU.S.IONS AND REgOM$ENDATIONE
In sunhary, the proposed rernodeL can be deeigned, (as discussed
1- detail-below irnairr "DESIGN MODIFfCATIONS'r), so that adverse
ieflection onto adjacent property will not occur' [he proposed
=u*oO"t, with the lesign rnoa-iticatione, w111 in fact 4egfgg€g any
,:cientlir problern vtth-such def Lection'
Septenber 16, 1991
Mr. Steve Riden
Box 3230Vail, CO 81658
LD1 llfi-lzrSrr, {- f ,i, t fl
Exposure to the above geological processeE was deternlned durlng
;;';i;;-viEir of slL2lst, Re spe?:itied 1n vail ordinance section
re.g9.osz (2), " tingi"-family iegidence, such as the Sipf
piiplrty, neiA noi-fi3-specialiy Oeelgned for geologlcal hazardr.
Deeien, however,
-no"t uil"t"" tlrat thE haaard ls not deflected
iot''aiA'the public or privatB property of otheEs'
snow. Ava]eleh.eg' Durlng extreme conditions (expected at return
;ilJf,dffif ,slears or frore), ernal1 vet or dry-f lowlng ava1anches
san reach the srfi-resldence. They w111 produce ,lPpagt loade on
exposed Eurfaceg which will be weti in excess of the lateral-
il!;fi; ;;;;;irt iii-"6rr.ir wood-frame ErrucrureE. Exposed wal1s,
aooi"r-or ilfnaoir'" nay ruptur€,.4s a resuLt of avqlanche irnpact'
and avalanche enJw- riy eht"r the bullding. Avalanche debriE r+1I1
be deposltea asai;"i-fn""upi'ttft luifding-surfaceE and will renain
ln plice until-lt lE renovei cr melts'
Ms lr/rrlttrt ' Aarhncha ' lslearlr Coatrd Entih"int
CCITT G3i# 3BY: y66gv Tetecopier ?01?;10-20-92 ; 8;?3Al,l| i 3032380382+SENT
b
Ric'Doci 2 t 19s2.
Debrig. Av4lanches. DebrlE avalanchee, conslsting of uet sno$t'
ffintrainedvegetativedebrls,cana1goreachthe[iJf.'*ifiE'of the-*ii"ti"g h5uEe and renodei. Debrle avalanches
ai""incfrded with Aelrls ilo*" at thiE slte becauee they. will- -
have similar eftects. They are rnost Lii(ely durlng exceptionally
*.t-"piir! runoti perlods.' 1'he rnoet recenl period of widespread
debri' avalanchlng-and flows.in Vail occurred durlng_MuYf -1?q1:e-foE"f "xarple oi r-,up!ne Drive occurred approxlrnately 700 feet
to-irr*-=outniaet-of d:; slpf property' Although debris
avalanches lnove slowly, they -re destructlve becauEe a
;;;;id;;lre vorun'e oi'sorlh debris (e:9' .rockE, ^treee) ' is
caiiiea with the avaJanche. Norrnal building walle are not
E-"i6i.a lo--r.=i"i itre resutting forces, and substantial
a."tiri.iion vouti-""itu:.nfy occir 1f the building were reachad'
RockfalL Rockfall can originate from the lineatona cllffs some
i.66-$EE above the Slpf profrerty, or from the ateep "1oF" ,. -irrnnediately below theie cliffs. Rockfall has occurre.l 1n EDe
paet ae evldenced by thB large rocks (1orn-e of whlch are clearly
ii-i""ititi orlginll tnat are Ecattered throughout the area'
irrii"g "nd nouiJii,i t-Jx1 -an darnase+ :xp?sed Eurfaces throush
irnpact-and/or by penetratlng wal'ls, windowe, ar doors'
Tha avalanche, debris flow, and rocltf,all processee described
above are not frequent; thiy probably wi11. not occur more than
Jne or two tirnee in a ientuly at this locatlon' Hoh?ever'
"ip*"ir""e in tfrfs--otO tttilir areas and the fleld evldence
of,talnea durlng lfre lit" vlsit prove= they are -possib]e; they do
con*t-itute a riniEe rlsk. Thle risJ< can be reduced by (1) -.;;;;i;i destgn to iesist avaranche and rockfarr roads and (b) by
self educatian uloui ihe avalanche and roclcfaLl pheno*eha Eo that
;;;id;-;i-""tr'r.rrty can be forecaet' Both rral and I'brr are
leconrnended at thiE and Elmilar Eites'
ApvEnsE_pEf,lEeIIQN \N
Neither snow otr debrig avalanches wiLl be pushed onto adjacent' /)D
;;ii;-oi-'prfvate property as-a reEuLt of the proposed renodq1 ' 'r't
ThiE ls true bec;"i"-ifi"y'w111 reach the structure at snall
velocittee and r+lii-irtn*'cfiiiefy be stopped by (or-penetrate)^baclc
wal}s. However, rockfall hazald to the propert| located to che
noi[tt"r*i will be-increaeed If ana]l rocks are deflected off the
lroposea west wail- iUErow the. new degic) , . and roll onto the
ia]-acent rot. rtrie'pi-niem wlth deflection can be mitlgated aB \
dlecussed belo\^r. Siinltar deflection onto Lot I4a w111 not be a fl
fiourenr.
D.SircN MOPAFTCATTOIS
The problern with adverae deflectton of roclcfall dlecussed above
;;; ;;-;ittgated ii a solid concrete wall (shown-on the attacheCl
ai'a"t"sJ,-iE-u"iit at the new.northwesr coiner of the bulldlng.
An alternate typi oi-*i-ir deeiEn would aIEo be f,easible if this
alternate walL Llso reslstE tha rockfall deslgn parameters
-..
,
,., /\Lr\r/\ rerssupler' ,utt5zu-vz ; U;Z3AM ;o0,r2uuo;ruz+
.RE0'Doci 21tggz
discussed below. This ttall should extend vertically up to the
deck.levelr (about 5 feet above grade), and away fTolt the
bulldlng cornetr extendlng to Uhe corner of the deck. TbB waII
nu6t be designed to stop a rolling rock 2 feet ln dlaneter
(dpprox. ?00 tbs) , rolling at 20 feet per second.
Please contact ne if you have ahy questions.
Sincerely,
f\ tt r ^A
L-1,,4 Lu'a'{. I} )dCId
Arthur I. Mears, P,E.
Avalanche-control engineer
bE;\ I DY; XETIUX
I-"
CCITT G3;S 5 \.
RtcDOcl ; I 1992"
v
u
B
q\
I
N
I
€o.
o_"{ hp
rd '.tUIO .rgF{ t{
nd ,r?.tDtc)
H+:0J ..1
l{ol{ 1r
{d
r1 0t
Fl 'dr! .F{fEOEo. P
- qr-
r- 'uFtl 0J| '.{t]{ rtrEI .Fl>l It
Ht €F.l -/
.l
I
II'lI
tJ-,
- 4rrA6flna/vf *?
-4/
-.!IF
o
6L4 l"?p')<.
$l'rI
a
q
I
n
$
F
n
t
a
5\
$
n
ta
J
fil\t
a
t\I
p
n
a
q
$
n
fiil
il
a
B
p
n
$
N
l
il
I
s'
natr)zr - ,Nallr,H
\.
NEW FI,WF
(w'. "lvun\- "- ?xwT' 2x"Q wht'L
*+<wf' {'w*t'u
/W z,xtt
0 /b" a.2.
atvph. (-^=\
DE/+p 0/ bthrr fldf,Mh( fz*wrw ft€,+rtp Ft-+/E
FaaP NAU 6a/1,a.dhhfl F0tzt+rt/lW wM@wtu*
la E-rfuQlR A/ilL p/qlE
,'--AW ?hrN 717P'{ arn&u wp
( t'-D* ,-,*)
/
t
UemT CaotTlt7a.) df ftanl& .ra Tpntep
,qAtW*fZ AS.*prrr.> ta.a/2//7a.u j
I$ sc*t4-
&"* ;
iie\x\t
N
\
f'vl
!
',rri i.
a6/62/32
A
L6= 48
Engineen, Itrc.
P.O_ Box l59t
0048 B, Bervcr Gaak Blvd. , Suie 3fl
Avon, Colorado 8162ll
(303) 94e-776E
FAX: (3o3) 949.'tur
13839494854o
onroe & Newell
MONROE/NEhELL ENG.e PAGE AL
,rcrt, JUN _ 2p6,yg, ot_ozqa 199P-
PROJECI#: lrSa
TOTAL PAGES :-_______r_
ONCI.I.IDING TRANSMITTAL)
F AC SI M I LE T RAI,T SMITTAL LETT ER
PH@.NE:
FMt
FRQM:. 1r+.tera Jtuat
SABIECT: 4t FF P-t6t Detle
MES.SAGI':
IF TMNSMITTAL IS NOT AS IN
.tl
"t
2.east waJI that runs east westthe easE. wall- are aciequate at
east waIl needs to be 3'-0
nl:ccd al- fhp nnrthr-0 deen :nri nl:r:ed
{-..'-}.a- !^ !1^^L.lYr,rL tlJ u l1e
#5 at 1-'-0 each way.
5.
6.
I
based on an alIowable soil bearingit can be determined that the actualof supporting a greater bearinqmodifications can be revised.
If you have any questions or cornments, please call_
Very truly yours,
Engineer
MCJ/kbf
Monroe & Newell
Engineers, [nc.
June 16, 1-992
Steven James Riden Architect
vQ ljox 5zJ6Vai1, CO 81658
Re: Sipf Residence (M&N #1137)
Gentlemen:
It has recently been called to our attention that theresj-dence's footings were founded, in some locations, on topsoil. In t.hese locations the footi-ng must be widened asspecified befow. To attach the new portion of footing Eo theexisting footing, use #5 dowels with epoxy at 1'-6 o.c. with6" embedment into the existing footing.
The footinqs are to be widened as follows:
1. The southern portion of the east wall that runs north tosouth needs to be 3r-6 wide.
Tl.ra cnrrina-n ,.^-f iOn Of Chevl ]r Fv! \
ar.l 1- hF .-trnl- rA l nOrtiOn Oftheir current width.
The northern portion of the
wicie.
A pad footing 7r-0 x 7'-0 needs to bewest corner. This footing sha11 be 1
below the existing footing and poured
bottom. It should be reinforced with
A 6r-0 x l2t-0 or 4'-0 x 16t-0 pad footing shal1 beplaced on the north wall cent.ered between the gTarage doorheader column and the floor step. It shall be 1'-0 deepand reinforced with #5 at 1t-0 each wav.
The western wal-l- needs to be 6'-0 wi-de where the footinqbears on topsoil.
()0.+ti L:. llcxver Crcek Blvd. . Suitc J07 o []. (). l]ox 159? . Av()r]. Cokrrrckr :il610 o t,i().a) 9e9-7;6t3 . r-AX (,ioj) 9 i9- 1959
Jt,
These modifications arepressure of 500 psf. Ifconstruction is capablecapacity, the extent of
Claire Jacobi
lt'
aleo
)a
Eln*r 6,e Ata t
/+t
Design Review Board
ACTIOil FOR}I
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 faxi 97O.479.2452
web: www.vailgov,com
Project Name: GOODWIN SOFRT
Project Description:
Participants:
Prcject Address:
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
Comments:
DRB Number: DRB060142
INSTALLA SOFFITTO EXISTING ROOFTO MATCH ADJOINING UNIT
owNER GOODMN, VERNE J. & PATRICIA05/05/2006
,{410 B COLUMBINE DR
VAIL
co 81657
AppucANT GOODMN, VERNE J. & PATRTCTA0S/05/2006
4410 B COLUMBINE DR
VAIL
co 81657
.1410 COLUMBINE DR VAIL LOCAIiONI 4410'B' COLUMBINE DR
Loe 18 Block: Subdiyision: WHIIE RIVER ESTATES
2101-122-0101-8
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
Conditions:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
ACtiON: STAFFAPR
Date of Approval: 06/19/2006
Cond: 8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building, Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval'
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced
and is diligently pursued toward completion.
Planner: Joe Suther DRB Fee Paidl $20.o0
E?ft B rus2
EEIC AIID .SISAT SIPF
4255 S- BeTTaire Cirele
EngT*ood, CoTorado 80770
(303) 759-3758
April 6, 7992
Andy Knut son
Department of Conmtnity
Town of Vail
Vail , Co 81658
Dear I,Ir . (nutson.'
Subject: S4tf Residerce
[,le realize that our property in question,
geogra.phicalTy sensitive ared and we have
Arthur lleyer artd accept those risks.
3876 E. Lupine Drive, is in a
studied the report subnitted by
?66t t3tdv u.dd
debris and rock fal1 hazardSeptenber 16, L997t we haveretaining wal1. This revisedrock traveling aL 20 feet peradjacent property should i-t
The waLl is expected to sustain damage if the rock hits the
wclrJ-.
If you have any other questions regarding this or any otherstructural considerations for the sipf Residence, please
ar allll- t i't 1_ Yna
Very truly yours,
a?-:C>- ;
Claire Jacobi
Enati naar
cJlkbf
cc: Mr. Steve Riden
Vail, Colorado
Denver, Colorado
Monroe & Newell
Enginees, Inc.
April 9, 1992
Mr. Andy Knudsen
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage RoadVaj-1, CO 8l-657
Re: Sipf Residence Remodel (M&N #1j-37)
Gentlemen:
After reviewing the avalanche,report by Arthur I. Mears datedrevised section 7S1 of the siteSection will prevent a 300 pound
second from traveling onto theimpact the all.
004f1 E. Beaver Cleek Blvd. . suitc 307 o P. o. I]ox 1597 o Avt>n, Colorado 81620 . (.103) ()49-j768 o FAX (303) 949-1959
4',-d t{.t-
fr
a
N
$
D
N
N
(n
rnoJoa
--l
x
t
t
II
ilt,
I
u
p
n
a
\
s
n
fi:{
il
a
q
$
n
il
N
fi
a
6\
s
n
F!LE f;$[jt'
75 soulh frontage road
vall, colorado 81657
(303) 479-2138
(303) 479-2139
February 13, 1992
otfice of communily developmenl
Eric and Susan Sipf
4265 S. Bellaire Circle
Englewood, CO 80110
Re: october 14, 1991 request for a setback variance for the Sipf Resldence,
3876 Lupine Drive/Lot 148, Block 1, Bighorn 2nd Addition.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sipf:
Enclosed is a copy of the minutes of the October 14, 1991 Planning and Environmental
commission (PEC) meeting at which your setback variance request was approved. The
attached copy of the meeting minutes will serve as your record of the conditions of approval.
Please note that the approval of this variance shall lapse and become void if a building permit
is not obtained and construction not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion, or
if_the use for which the permit is granted has not commenced within one year from approval
(October 14' 1991). lf approval of this conditional use permit lapses, an application must be
resubmitted for reconsideration by the Community Development Department staff and the
lf you have any questions or comments regarding this information, please do not hesitate to
contact Andy Knudtsen at 303i479-2138.
Sincerely,
ilruu,u,(to"k.,
Amber Blecker
Planning Assistant
Enclosure
u{Eii t
Project Application
'^'" /4/4n/
Prolect
Project
Contact
Name:
Description:
Person and
owner,AddressandPhonei Ef ', 4 5^5"^ {iff
4z G{ S . vJc//< r, C,r, /- , €n
^
(, -,or( ( A &/ta
Archirect,Addressandphone: -(/'c.rr y' r( ,, Pa 8+ Szzk Z ,/ c,t
&/(, t y
Legal Description: Lot t4n ' /1 or"L, ' "r . Btocx / . Fitins /J!f L('4 'z!r*:
zone
-
v
Comments:
Design Review Board
o^" /a//a/q/
D ISAPPR OVAL
Summary:
A /"-: tt't
Town Plan ner
,^,", /l-//r.rk t
El statt Approval
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
r ,i l
MEMORANDUM : ,r /
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Dcvelopment Departnent
Ocober 14, l99l
A rcquest for a setback variance for the Sipf Residence, 3876 Lupine Drive/-ot
l4B, Block l, Bighom 2nd Addition.
Applicants: Eric and Susan Sipf
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE VARIANCE REOTIESTED
The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to the existing single family home on this
property. The addition would be for tlre first and second floon. The house, at this time, is
iocated within thc l5-foot side yard sctback. Thc south elevation of the house is
approximately 32 fl*l high and is set back 6 feet from the sidc property line. There are
decks which surround the house which extend completely across the side yard setback and, in
one case, extend over the propefty line onto thc neighbors' property. In the remodeling
effon, the applicant would remove all of the existing decks. New decks would be added to
the rcar of the house, which would meet the standards of the zoning codc. There is also an
evergreen tree, approximately 6O feet tall, located about eight feet from the easrcm (front)
side of the house.
There are two parts of the proposed construction which require side setback variances. The
fint is an approximately 25 sq. ft. expansion to the entryway. The other is an exterior
staircase *t ittt *tapr around the approximately 6G.foot tall trec, and lcads up to the cntry' If
approved, loth portions of the dwelling would have a six-fmt sidc setback. In addition to the
2f sq. ft. cxpaniion to be made on the main floor for the entry, the lower flmr will be
expanded by the same amount to match what will be above ir
o
u.ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
Zone District:
l.ot Size:
Hcight:
GRFA:
Sctbacks
Front:
Side s
North:
South:
Rear:
Site Coverage:
Parking:
Primary/Secondary Re sidential
l9,l7l sq. ft.
Allowed
33 ft.
5,097 sq. ft.
20 ft.
15 ft.
15 ft.
15 ft.
3,994 sq. ft.
3 spaces
Existine
34 ft
2,925 sq. ft.
ll5 ft.
34 ft.
6 ft.
104 ft.
975 sq. ft.
3 spaces
Proposed
24 ft
3,341 sq. ft.
86 ft.
19 ft.
6 fL*
87 ft.
1,819 sq. ft.
3 spaces
Area of requested variance.
UI. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon rcview of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060 of the Vail Municipal Code'
the Community Development Department rpcommends approval of thc rcquested
variance based on the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
l. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and struc{ures in the vicinity'
Staff bclieves the proposed addition and removal of the decks will improvc the
rclationship benpeen this structurc and its neighbor o thc south. Currcntly, the
decks of the housc extend up to the southern property line an4 in onc location,
cross it and extend into the ncighbor's yard. Staff believes that the applicant
will reduce the amount of encroachment and improvc the relationship to the
surrounding strucrurBs by eliminating all of thc dccks on the southern side of
the house.
The two parts of the proposed addition which rt4uire a variancc arc the
addition to the cntry and the cxtcrior staircase. In thc cssc of the expansion-to
the entry, the structure will b€ located undcrneath the existing rooflinc-and will
not rcquire an cxpansion !o thc rggf to covcr if Funhcrmore, this addition will
not be extendcd north of the existing building and would not tEduce thc
sctback any morc than what it prescntly is.
The cxterior staircasc is thc other pan of thc proposal which rcquires a
variancc. In a similar manner to ttrc dcsign of the cxpansion to the enury' the
staircase does not further encmach into thc sctback than does thc cxisting
house. T[c 6 ft. sctback which currcntly exists would bc maintained- Staff
bclievcs the architcct has minimized the amount of mass and bulk on-site
which is in thc setback. During the reyiew of this proposal, the staff rcquested
that the size of thc staircasc roof bc rcduced and that the stairway location
provide at least as much setback as the existing structure. These
recommendations having been incorporated into the design, staff believes the
remodeted structue will bc an improvement over $e existing rclationship to
the surrounding arca. ,-,' . ) t .',,, \ 1/ ..' ( (,,". r'a .'/
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation
and enforcement of e sPecified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment smong sites in the
vicinity or to attain the objectives of this titte without grant of
special privilege.
Staff believes the location of the cxisting structus is a physical hardship. The
housc is currcntly set back 6 feet from the side proPerty line; the roof cave has
a |.S-foot sctback. In addition to the location of the existing building, the
approximately 60-foot ree in front of the sructure is also a constraint. The
architcct needed to providc cxterior access to thc sccond floor, but had limiled
options due to the tree location. Becausc of the location of the tree and house,
areas for additions are located within the side yard setback. Staff believes that
relief from the srict interpreution of the sctback requirement for thcse
componcnts is appropriate to allow the expansion of the structure to take placc.
3. The effect ofthe requested variance on light 8nd air, distribution of
population, transportation end traffic facilitieg public facilitie and
utilities, and Public safetY.
Staff bclicves therc will be no impacts hom thc proposed expansion on any of
the issues above.
r, )
''r'-'''|''i'
B. Thc Plannine and Environmental Commission shall make the followine
findinss beforc lrantins a variance:
l. That rhe granting of the variance will not constitute I grant of special
privilcgc inconsistent wirh the limitations on other properties classified
in the same district.
2. That the granting of rhe variance will not be deuimental o the public
health, safery or welfare, d materially injurious to pmperties or
improvements in the vicinitY.
3. That thc variancc is warranted for one or morg of thc following Easons:
a. The strict litcral inrerpretation tr cnforccment of the specificd
rcgulation would result in practical diffrculty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There arc exceptions or cxtraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not
apply generally to othcr propertics in the same zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of thc specified
rcgulation would deprive the applicant of privilegcs enjoyed by
the owners of other propenies in the same district.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the variance, as we feel it meets thc criteria discussed above.
In addition, staff belilves the findings are met. Specifically, Finding I is met, in staff s
opinion, as approval of this rcquest would not constitute a grant of special privilege. ln other
cases, staff has recommended approval of variances based on the fact that the existing
building is already locatcd in the setback, and the addition does not further rcduce the
remaining setbaci. Finding 2 is met as the rcquest would not affcct public health, safety or
welfare. pinaing 3(a) is met, in staff"s opinion, as a strict inrcrprctation of the sctback
regulation would result in an unnecessary physical hardship. Staff bcfieves that, bccausc the
ho-use was built 6 fect from the southern propcrty line, and because thcre is an approximately
60-foot tall trec about eight feet from the no'rthern clevation of the house, that therp area
physical constrainrs on the site. Based on the fact that the physical constraints limit the
deiign sotutions, staff rccommends approval of the reqrest with thc following conditions:
l. prior ro issuance of a Tempcary Certificatc of Occupancy, applicant shall pave the
entire drivcwaY.
4
2. Prio to issuancc of s final Crrtificatc of Occupancy, applicant sldl phnt I ryrucc and
3 rspcn bcnrccn drc proporcd rtaircasc ud tlr strrct, ud shall sccd and rcgradc 0tc
disturbed portions of thc sitc.
It,cgocrocoodrr[torr \ . i,l . Ar^rt\ t^ &^Jt' {/r''\
f, "rt"l' 'r.5
rJ,"*,\ rlu"4
a
\
1--..t--'_
I
I
!i
d
I,iililt
$iiiiIiiI
\..'
\---.-. \--'- 7_.---.-,
,, ;
i:l /
lEl I
tt5.'
II
a.
1!_
(
I
I
'(
ir
;
l
I
'*)
6p
r-- i
AQEq<d
e':j
:FE3vro
-(l
t
I
t
f
g
I
i
'l
+I
i
I /
''' I | '-=--1
"It---'t: | | ----1t-:1
I
h-' i'Jl.r': lI
\
$
'-lt
--"'irl_I
=--:11
-- --+,T
*-+ -.-t- I -
I _i__.i.J
ttt-1
I--t
ri =;l4
r:-"ll,l::L -
It^'\l.1;
ll \rI' tl'[ * ,ttl\,irj It
t\/t^, A'\r
t . r\n
\;\
I
II
I
I
(
I-l
l
I
I
h
rl
)
14,
TItt
I
I
I
Lat
!
!
ffiliii
lfilfil
liiliiii
S=<o".
-t..
?o.
rr: *),.}
:t
ifI
;D
l'
ri
:I
Ir
st
ilI
I
I
t
a
!
I
E
Ci
I
e;t E
it;
51t
iilria
oo
'j:
w
rl
Etg-lariE
t5e:g
erJ es drIsJ:i
i !ii sI|c e 'rO Is:-i!;5Et:\5t
esrElE
E€ srr i
t.ttbt
3 E;S5f,
'os' >c,
I
I
t
ItI:
It
3
l.f
to
ut
a.'5
5
B
It/,
//t
t
\
.ooi
oa
to
o(,
>
so(t
r,lIrl
!rt>
b
I!o
:oI
6A
aao(,
Io
I
6t
e
ttotcl
I
o
,t
oq
R
irii
I
ilir
O*rOrrl,
)
)#
I
/I
l,tl
rl
Ita' -
n
i)
A
I
\l
i"r
f it I,ll
{
1,
trv
t
so
E
ctr.toc
I
Ia
t
I
oI
Ie
o{
6
;
.t
w-t#/
,^
'\i{-i
iiil
ilI|
lili
llli
lii;
lil
iii
i!!
I
I
I
tt
I
!
I
I
llt
I
I
I
o
,ilr,,,"^,,,r
o
/h,/',*
z4
)-o
/1 / /g- 4rtr:I
9 ,'lt.c
/.
e f:// ,'+'17ut 6
/ 'r.r
"/ ,-rrr.(r{rrro
/"-t"'{ ,r',
z-.- J
r"/.( t,. ,,
o6,
ri
o
a
aI
I
a
Ia
3
i
!Iiiiiii!iiii
iillrisi;if
tfiliiiiil
tiiiiiiiifii
(\
?o..
*'. .ij} r'
,rl
iso
!'
+d7
:I !a.6p It-
l.t
s
$
\t
at
I
a
I
ot
aaatlt
!:;l"u
rr!r l5aa
31.
ti"'iil
t
!
I
I
t
to
ttla
c.'l
toi\
B
!tt
g;.ut
E U'L
ts35i,r.3.. J
e,3E gc E
r"e.bf,
E 3rE:5
c8{'E E
s5 r s EE
I Sisff
>g,
,*
0
.oo}.
o
qco
oo
>.F-foo
Itq
J
!]
o
aio]-
to
l,
aao
-o
da5
It
t
oJ
,<
()qqL
irii
I
J!i
rldl
:;li
;'5h
*7?*o
":::z ,,/$s ')ilt il tlllA' El diJ
w"'il_r$
I
\lEr.l
| \r/
r st I
t
{
I
I
Y(J
qaL
trr
('-
a
-J
a
$
I\/
7.:x7,f{:
%)
t'ft
w
// /
// |'4""J;"".--.- -,/
.os
llr
tl
I
,i\ll-{ '
j
t:- i It:- t \P
ir '\it ''ft:?1\:'f,tt
i(
,. (.
1
\
i ,,r
/\ 't1., \)'
). .\'"". i
t
F
F
gh
ll
a
I
tir
\\\
$'r-,/.,
,/ a--/ ct
""' d!./
....'/ --)o('
lrr
F,
a
I
I
I
I
:
./4t
r\i\
:\
[\
h\
,/
-/--
ARTHURI.MEARS, P.E., INC.
Natural Hazards Consultar,u
222 Ear Cothic Ave.
Guurircn, Colorado 8l 230
)0) - 641.)236
September l-6, 1991
Mr. Steve Riden
Box 3230Vai1, CO 81658
RE: Sipf Rernode}, 3876 Lupine Drive, Vail. Avalanche, debris
flow and Rockfall- considerations.
Dear Mr. Riden:
In response to your request, I have conpleted an evaluation of
avalanche, debris flow, and rockfall hazards to the above-
referenced property. The objectives of my evaluation are:
a. To deterrnine the exposure and potential hazard,' and
b. To determine if the proposed rernodel (as specified
in your drawings of 8-25-91) will deflect avalanche or
rockfall onto adjacent property.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMIiIENDATIONS
In summary, the proposed remodel can be designed, (as discussed
in detail below under "DESIGN MoDIFICATIoNSTT), so that adverse
deflection onto adjacent property will not occur. The proposed
remodeL, with the design rnodifications, wilI in fact decrease any
potential problem with such defl-ection.
EXPOSURE TO SNOW AND DEBRIS AVALANCHES AND ROCKFALL
Exposure to the above geological processes was deternined during
ny site visit of 9/L2/91. As specified in Vail ordinance section
18.69.052 (2), a single-family residence, such as the Sipf
property, need not be specially designed for geologicaL hazards.
Design, however, must ensure that the hazard is not deflected
toward the public or private property of others.
snow Avafanches. During extrene conditions (expected at return
periods of 25 years or nore), small wet or dry-flowing avalanches
can reach the Sipf residence. They will produce irnpact Loads on
exposed surfaces which will be well in excess of the lateral-
loading capacity of normal wood-frane structures. Exposed walls,
doors, or windows may rupture as a result of aval-anche irnpact,
and avalanche snow may enter the building. Avalanche debris will
be deposited against the uphill building surfaces and will remain
in place until it is renoved or melts.
Mass Wating o Aulanchet ' AulancAc Contal Engincenng
Debris Avalanches. Debris avalanches, consisting 9f wet snow'
ffintrainedve9etativedebris,cana1soreachthei."f'walls of the existing house and remodel. Debris avalanches
iie in"fnded with debris ilows at this site because they will- -nive sinilar effects. They are nost likely during exceptionally
r.t-"pii"g runoff periods. T!. most recenl period of widespread
aelri's avilanching and flows in Vait occurred during MtYt-1984'
A 1ocal example oi r_,upine Drive occurred approxirnately 700 feet
to the southeast of t-he Sipf property' Although debris
avalanches move slowly, they are destructive because a
considerable volurne oi'so1ih debris (e.g. rocks, trees) , is
carried with the avalanche. Normal building walls are not
a."i-g""a to resist the resulting forces, and substantial
destiuction r.rould certainly occur if the buitding were reached.
Rockfall. Rockfall can originate from the linestone cliffs some
4oo feet above the Sj-pf property, or from the steep slope
irnnediately below these Lfi-ifs. Rockfal-I has occurred in the
pirt "" evidenced by the large rocks (sorne of which are clearly
^of rockfall origin)l tnat are scattered throughout the area.
nolling and bouncing rocxs can damaged exposed surfaces through
impact and/or by penetratinq waIIs, windows, or doors'
The avalanche, debris flow, and rockfall processes described
above are not frequent; they probably will not occur more than
one or two tirnes in a century at this location. However,
e*p"ri"n"e in this and similar areas and the field evidence
o5tainea during the site visit proves they are possible; they do
constitute a finite risk. This risk can be reduced by (a)
;;;;i;i design to resist avalanche and rockfall loads and (b) by
self education about the avalanche and rockfall phenomena so that
p.iioa= of activity can be forecast' Both rrarr and rrbtr are
?ecommended at this and sirnilar sites'
ADVERSE DEFLECTION
Neither snow or debris avalanches witl be pushed onto adjacent
;ilif;-or private property as a result of the proposed renodel'
ini= is true because ttr"y-wil1 reach the structure at small
velocities and will inneiiatety be stopped by (or penetrate) back
walfs. However, rockfall hazaid to the property located to the
northwest will be increased if srnall rocks are deflected off the
proposed west waII (below the.new deck), and roll onto the
iajicent fot. This problen with deflection can be mitigated as
dilcussed be1ow. siinitar deflection onto Lot 14a wiII not be a
problem.
DESIGN MODITICATIONS
The problem with adverse deflection of rockfall discussed above
r.r, t" nitigated if a solid concrete wall (shown on the attached
drawing), is bui. It at the new northwest corner of the building'
An alternate type oi wall design would also be feasible if this
alternate wall ilso resists the rockfall design parameters
t.
discussed below. This walI should extend vertically up to the
deck level, (about 6 feet above grade) , and away fron the
building corner extending to the corner of the deck. The wall
must be designed to stop a rolling rock 2 feet in diameter
(approx. 70o lbs) , rolling at 20 feet per second.
Please contact ne if you have any questions.
S j-ncerely,
0",1f1"r4 f(\ean,
Arthur I. Mears, P.E.
Avalanche-controL engineer
x\1"
b0
+q{
\o
x
l{A/Pr'
|I|.]
F
F{H
RrcaFlLFI
hd!|d\ r-),-oIft!
,-t t
E
I
t-r
E
v
B
q
o..r bo
d .t-{()3
All €-t
.d +FO og+
O '.1
tr t{(d(d
.-l 0).'{ 'dd '-lq-r &
I?L \H
.. .o 7'-\.{l O -tI ..{ O\
Hl :'A
gl gd
F.t '---,
.c!
I-' -t.\-.l
i
I:-- !_1\-
|---j
t ulfu- ;i6"- *il Wel .7a','-"t P+cpl*P
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental
Conrnission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in
accordance with Section L8.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on October 14, 1991 at 2:00 p.m. in the Town of VaiI
Municipal Building. Consideration of:
1. A worksession to conslder rezoning Lots 3 through 9 and t2,
vail Meadows FiLing No. 2 fron Agricultural and Natural Open
Space to Residential Cluster.Applicant: Vail City Corporation and David Elmore
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
2. A request for a wall height variance for the Chester
Residence, Lot 19, Block 1, Vail Village 1st, FilinS/39s Mi]l
Creek Circle.Applicant: E.B. ChesterPlanner: Kri.stan Pritz
3. A follow-up to the AugusL 12, 1991 PEC revj.ew of the staff
approval of the minor amendment for Garden of the Gods, SDD
No.22, Lot K' Block 5A, Vail Village 5Lh Filing/365 Vail
Valley Drive.Applicant: Margaret Hill Marital Trust
Planner: Shelly Mello
4. A request for a conditional use permit for a cellular
telephone "cell siterr at Red Sandstone School, 551 North
Frontage Road/Lot 2' Block 8, vail Potato Patch.
Applicant: The Walter GroupPLanner: Andy Knudtsen
5. A request for a minor amendment to the Golden Peak
developnent plan to allow for the installation of a rope tow
lift, 498 vail valley Drive,/TracL B, VaiI Village ?th
Filing.
Applicant: Vail Associates
P]anner: Jil1 Kanmerer
6. A request for a setback variance for the Sipf Residence,
38?6 Lupine Drive/Lot 14B' Block 1, Bighorn Znd Addition.
Applicants: Eric and Susan SiPf
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
'1 . A request for a satellite dish antenna variance for the
,Jackalope Cafe and Cantina, 2161 N. Frontage Road west/Lot
2A, Resubdivision of Lot 2, Vail Das Schone Filing #3.
Applicant: Jackalope, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
6.A request for a conditional use permit and a variance to the
parking standards, Section 18.52 of the Town of Vail
tlunicipal Code to allow for off-street surface parking at
the "HoIy Cross parcel" which is generally located on the
north side of the South Frontage Road east of and
imrnediately adjacent to Red Sandstone Creek.
10
A request for a setback variance for a garage at the
Kaiser/Hal-I Residence, 4913 Juniper Lane/Lot 3, BLock 5,
Bighorn 5th Addition.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicants:
Planner:
vail AssociatesJilI Kanmerer
Ursula Kaiser/Robert Ha1l
SheIIy Mello
Town of Vail/vail Associates
Andy Knudtsen
A request for an amendnent to the approved conditional use
permit in order to construct a snow dump on the property
generally tocated west of the Town of Vail Shops. The
property is more specifically described as fo]lows:
That part of the North 1,/2 of section 8, Townshj-p 5 South,
Range 80 west of the 6th Principal Meridian' Eagle County,
Colorado, lying north of Interstate Highway No. 70 and being
nore particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the NE corner of said Section 8; thence along
the noruherly line of said Section 8, S89 46' 27nw a distance
of 1500.00 ft; thence departing the northerly line of said
Section 8r S00 23'03"W a distance of 529.86 ft to a point on
the northerty ROW line of I-70i thence along the northerly
ROW line of I-70 following two courses:
1) 575 28' l-8"E a distance of L80.82 ft to a point of
curvaturer'
2') 132'7.90 ft along the arc of a curve to the left, having
a radius of 5580.00 ft, a central angle of 13 38'04rr
and a chord which bears N89 36'34"E 1324.70 ft distance
to a point on the easterly line of said Section 8i
Thence departing said Row line of r-70 N00 23' 03"8 along the
easterly line of said Section 8, a distance of 572.10 ft to
the point of beginning, containing 20.480 acres more or
l-ess.
The above description is based on the Town of Vail
annexation plats for the property described and is not based
on a field survey. The basis of bearing for the above
parcel is the northerly line of Section 8 being S89 46'27"W
as shown on said annexation Plats.
A request to amend ChapLer t8.32' Agricultural and Open
Space, Section 18.32.030 - Conditional Uses in order to
allow well water treatment facilities as a conditional use.
Applicant: Vail Valley Consolidated Water District
11
Planner Shelly Me1lo
72. A request to anend Chapter L8.62' Variances, Section
18.62.080 - Permit Issuance and Effect and Chapter 18.50,
Conditional Use Permits, Section l-8.60.080 - Permit Issuance
and Effect in order to clarify the notification of approval
procedures.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: JiII Kanmerer
13. A reguest for a worksession on Millrace Iv Special
Development District No. 4, for Cascade Village, to review a
development planr generally located south of Millrace
Condominiurns and west of the Westin Resort' Vail .
Applicant: East-west Partners
Planner: Shelly Mello
14. A request for approval of a wetland mitigation proposal for
areas along Gore Creek and Booth Creek.
Applicant: Upper Eagle Valley water and Sanitation
Dist rict
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
rnformation on the listed j.tems is avaifable at the Community
Development office in the VaiI Municipal Building during regular
office hours.
TOWN OF VAIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Published in t.he Vail Trail on September 27, 1991.
W.E. Stewan
3880 Lupine Dtue
\hil, co s1657
Richard and Celia Nonis
3838 BrkJge Road
Vail, CO 81657
Susan Kopff
c/o Susan Snow
417 Brentwood Blvd.
Lafayetle, LA 70503
C. Stanley and B. Marcia Wilson
5455 w. Jewel Averue
Lakewood, CO 80232
Garrol Sam Tyler
382/ Lupine Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Karen B. Barrett
1397 Vail Valley Drive
Vail, CO 81657
o o
o
DateAppl lcatlon tember 16,l99I
PEC MEETING DAT
APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE
l. Th!1 Rrocedure ls requlred for rny proJect requestlng a varflnce.wlll not be rccepted'unill rll Inioimallon ls'submlt[ed.
t9gl
The rppl lcatlon
A. llAl'lE 0F APPLTCANT Eric and Susan Sipf
4265 South BellaireADDRES
Enqlewood,Co. 80110 PHON E
B.I{AME 0F APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE srewpn .ramcs pidan a r A-
ADDRESS P.o.Box 3238,VaiI,co.8165A
PHoNE 949-4121
c.NAHE 0F OI.INER(S) (type or prtnt Mr. and
ADDRESS 4265 So"ttt g"If"i.
PHONE
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS 3876 Lupine Dr. Vail,CO.
D.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTI4/BBTOCX I FILING Bighorn 2nd addition
tl I r- ^ t J,E. FEE g250.00 pND qltulq cK # ICTl/ FRoM )h,,.t f,l.e*.-
-
THE FEE MUST BE PAID EEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTI.IENT }IILL ACCEPT
YOUR PROPOSAL.
F. A list of the names of owners of all property aajacent to the subJect property
INCLUDING PR0PERTY BEHIND AND ACR05S STREETS, and their malling addresses.
THE APPLICANT I.IILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES.
II. A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE l.|ITH A PLANNING STAFF I',IEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED
TO.:DETERMINEIFANY'ADDITIONAL INFORMTION IS NEEDED. NO APPLICATION I{ILL BE
ACCEPTED UNLESS IT IS CoMPLETE (MUST INCLUDE ALL ITEMS REQUIRED By THE ZoNTNG
ADMINI5TRATOR). IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MKE AN APPOI}ITIIENT
UITH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL 5UBHITTAL REQUIRE.IENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION I.IILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR'
YOUR PROJECT gV OTCTMSIfr,_G THE NUI.IEER OF CONDITIONS oF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING
AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMHISSION HAY STIPULATE. ALL CONDITTONS OF APPROVAL }IUST 8E
COMPLIED I.IITH BEFORE A BUILDING PER'',IIT IS ISST'ED.
tlI. F0uR (4) C0PIES 0F THE FOLL0$|ING I{UST BE SUBMITTED:
A. A I.,RITTEN STATEI'IENT OF THE PRECISE }IATURE OF THE VARIAIICE REQUESTTD A}ID THE
REGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT HUST ALSO ADDRESS:
l. The relatlonshlp of the requested varlance to'other exlstlng or potentlal. uses and structures In the vlclnlty.
. 2. The degree to which refief from the strrct or literal lnterpretatlon and
enforcement.of a_speclfled regulatlon ls necessary to achleie conpatlbllit
rnd unlformlty of treatment among sltes In the vlclnlty or to attiin the
obJectives of this tltle without grant of speclal prlvllege.
3. The effect of the variance 0n light and air, distribution of population'
transportation, traffic faci'l itiis, utilities, and pub'l ic safety.
4. How your o
requ est complles wlth Val1,s Comp lve Plan.
o
rehens
B. A topographfc and/or fnprovement survey at-a scale of at.least l. - 20r stampe,' bv a colorado lrcensed iur"eior-tiiiuaing tociiii"s-ir-irr.exrsting rmprove-ments, fncludlng-grades ina-iieviliins. :oilrei-ii.'i.nis."nrcn hust be shownare parklng tnd l?:1i19 areas,-tngress and egress, iinir.Ep.c areas andutility and dralnage fiatures. -
C. 4lltq plan at a scale of at least l,r.20lbul I dl ngs.showlng exlstfng rnd pmposed
D' lJl prellminary buildlng elevatlons and-floor plans sufficlent to Indicate
:19,!lffi"il!"i;333E[i];.tf,:"lince' scare ano irse oCiii't,iiorii"lii'li!"",
A preliminary tltle report to verlfy ownershlp and easemenis
If the proposal ls located In a multl'family development whlch has a homeowners,association, then wrrtten.apfrouai irom the aiioiiiiiiii'rn'support of theprojebt must be received bv'i auiy ai,ir,oiiieJ-;;;;;-i;; iftc associatron.
Any additional materiar necessary for the revrew of the apprication asdetermfned by the zoning aaminisiriiir..
For Interlor modifica^tlo1s, gn improvement survey and srte pran nay bewaived by the zoning administrai;;:- -
Tlme Requlrments
The Planning 'and Envlronmental Conrnisslon meetsot each month. A complete app'l lcation form and(as described above) must be'submjtted a minimumptt
.
pub t i c heari ng. No i ncompl ete appl i cati onsadmrnistrator) will be accepted by the planningnated submi tta'l date.
If.thl_s appllcatlon requlres a geparate review by any local, State orFederal l9-ency_glher thin the Torrn of vJrr-,-tr,L-"firl"itr"n fee shall beincreased by 5200.0.0. Exanrples of such review, ,*1/'l;;i"de, but are noteLimited to: colorado Depart-ment of Hlghr"y e"""""'p.iriits. Army corps ofEnglneers {04, etc.
The apprlcant BhalL^be r_esponslble for. paylng any publishing fees rrhichare in excess of S_O!^o! !lr. applicati5n'fe6. if-,-.t the appll_cant,srequest, any matter.J-s postponea for hearJ.ng, causi"q-the naiiei-io-u"re-publlshed, then. the Lntire fee for such ie-puurr..1ro., "h;rr-;"-;ur;by the applJ.cant.
Appllcations deemed_ by the cornnrunlty DeveroPment Department to haveslgnificant- design, rand use or other issu." "rrijr,-*"y t'"rr. a signlrrcinilmPact on the conununity may requlre review by consultinis ottrer than townstaff . should a determinalioribe made ly t-tieio*n-s-ti?r that an Jut"ia"consuLtant ls needed to revrew any.appricitlon, the -ommunity n"""iol^.nimay hire an outs{de consultant, - it-'shall esti.aie- itre amount of monevnecessary. -to pay_ him or her and thls amount shalt ue rorwiia"J-t"-Ii3Town by. the applicant at the tirne he f:.res his -afifric"ti"n -*rtr, ii.,Icommunity Development Department. upon compretr.on ,ii 1re re"ie" oi iii"appllcatlon by the coniultantr an| of tfr" t"nas- forwardJ bt ;i;;applicant fo-r payment of the consultint nhich have noC been paidao iii"consultant shall be returned to the appllca-nt. e*penses incurred ;t ;il;Town in excess of the amount forwarde-d-by the "ppii"iri sharl be piia-i"tbe Town bv the applicanr wirhln 30 dayj "t ""fir-r.iiiln by the Town.
E.
F.
G.
*
IV.
on_the Znd and 4th ilondaysall accompanying materlai
.of 4 weeks prior to the date of the
Ias_determined by the zoningstaff before or after the disig-
I A M E S . ll D E
POST OFFICE BOX 3238
vAIL, CO.81658
949-1L2L
Sept.15 r I99I
Planning and Enviromental Comission
Dept of Community Development
Town of VailVail,CO. 81657
Attnt [r.Andrew Knutson
RE: Sipf residence
Dear llr. KnutsonMr. and Mrs. Eric Sipf have asked me to request
a varience to the Town of Vail zoning ordiance
18.13.060 concerning the set back fron the sidelot of fifteen(I5) feet.
The Sipfrs intend to renodel- there existing
residence and since the residence is currently
non-conforming the remodel uust also occur withinthe required setback-
The potion of the renodel that is to be constructedwithin the setback has been designed to best preserve
the veiws of the adjacent property osrner and toavoid the removal of a very large evergreen tree(50-69feet) irnrnediatly in front of the present
structure- lfhe renodel also includes the renovalof allthe presently encroaching decks off theexisting structure.It is their intent not to exceed the ]-initsof the existing encroachment and only so with
an apporpiate entry (approx.30sf) and a coveredstair leading to the entry (Approx.I00sf of coveredstair actuaLly is encroaching).
Should there be any questions in regardsto this matter please contact this office at once.
Regards;
James Ritlen A.I.A.
. MEMBER OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS.
Sept - 15,199I
Dept.of Conmunity Development
Town of VailVail,CO. 81658
Attn: An<lrew Knutson
RE: Sipf Residence
Dear Andy,
The following is a list of the adjacent property
owners;
Lot tract B Bighorn 2nd Addition
W.E Stewartl-30-8 Okasawa
Setagaya-kufokyo 158
Japan
( local; 3880 Lupine Dr.Vail,CO.81658
Lot 12 Blk I Bighorn 2nd
Richard ancl Celia Norris
3838 Bridge Road
VaiI,CO- 8f657Lot 13 BIk 1 Bighorn 2nd
Susan Kopff
c,/o Susan Snow
417 Brentwood Blvd.Lafayette LA. 70503
Lot15 Blk I Bighorn 2ncl
C.Stanley and B.}larcia Wilson
5455 W-JeseI Ave-
Lakewood,C0- 80232Lot 6 BIk l- Bighorn Ist AdditionCarrol Sam Tyler
3877 Lupine DR.Vail,CO. 81657Lot 7 Blk 1 Bighorn Ist addition
Karen B. Barrett
1397 Vail Valley Dr.
J A M E s .llD E
POST OFFICE BO){ 3238
vAIL. CO.81658
. (3 o 3):5lB(S:(FF6li,,949-4r2r
. MEMBER OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS.
FII F Ff|nrr
75 soulh front8ge road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 479'2138
(3Gr) 479-2139
of{ice of community development
August 30, 1991
Mr. Stephen Riden, AIA
P.O. Box 3238
Vail, CO 81658
Re: Lot 14, Tract A, Block 1, Blghorn Second Flllng, Slpf Remodel
D
Dear Steve:
After a review of the proposed Sipf remodel, the planning staff has several questions. The
most important involves setbacks, and the potential that your proposal may need variances.
Both the proposed structure, as well as the proposed exterior staircase, appear to be located
in the side setback. Other issues which must be resolved before any Board review of the
proposal include the slope of the driveway, the topography of the site, hazard reports, a
potential water course setback and possible wetlands which may exist on the site.
Please call me at your earliest convenience so we may discuss these issues. Some of them
may be easily resolved, while others, specifically the setback standards, may require a PEC
hearing. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
-#"4&/,L/And/Knbdlgbn I
Town Planner r
i,u
(r'
, q\q\
, r''J 'i
l, a-tl t-
t ic"
{..'> "lab
) v 6klw,u-1sLrf-<- -#
-/ ltu 5o-rtl'o '
sFR,
DATE ! Auc-, ZI , t 7a t
LEGAL DESCRIP?ION: Lot - !'/b
ZONE CHECK
FORR, R P/S ZONE DISTRICTS
"7rn,/l
Block Filing
ADDRESS:
OWNER
ARCHTTECT
38 )b Lt<. n<
PHONE
PHONE
Q4?- 4,zr
?qq- v/z /
ExisLinq
wo tlo^f
Total
lt<' lLat-tt-
-ta ' <i\ rt/Ia I iL I
Proposed
24'
z
'?41
*
3 i4l
t'filz
fT-py.-l;|
6K
rk
,tl/-
os. [87.,*-1,
Ol'rE-
0l<
6K
Dl<
OK
dk
OL
20t
15'
15t
(30) (s0)
14t
SIte Coverase Zo7al \1f1+* 1,aa4 r
tandscaping
Retaining WalI Height.s
Parking
Garage Credit
Drl-ve:
View Corridor Encroachment:
Environment al /Hazards :
3t /6t
Permitted Slope BE Actual Slope
Date approved by Town Englneer!
Yes No v.' ???
o.w,
a) Snow AvaJ.ancheb) Rockfalt Ar
,/c) Debrls Flow t{r,' 4) Wetlands
4 Reqrd ?
(3oo)K5n-oil(eoo) (t2oot ++'t +
E]
F '::-r:--F| .A_ |
- !, Flood Plain
UJT
,' 2l Percent Slope Ots-. - s*?t--.qdttuJ ZfrJ.h-qo'b
e,.J-ntoTe*na- Lb'Js3 oe: v,+t|;,'/.eal/",31 Geologic Hazards
Does this request involve a 250 Addition? n o
How much of the arlowed 250 Addit.iJn-ie uaealliE-Th'rs request,?
10
-Z-. c-t't. zz c Lol / ' t'X h' J.r'/- .,(
PROPOSED USE,A{a?rni:a-I--r.6 €JbLe- F/a}.-uu{
LOT SIZE
zoNE DIsrNcr /eb-abel /fu_^le^zT
Height
All.owed
(30) (33)
Total GREA 19,65p/ 26,3Jso -.7p'q1 A
4,rt1r / .ro -4q+.tBsol (42s')
4 e-x>- >er-t *
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
,/,/ .I"6'olu SFr }.:'(: k i'
Water Course
Front
Sides
Rear
Setback
Rbt1_l_
qq{q*z
t6ta +
-
2 4'A'{
J€CK 04 ,,"-d1
"
ro1"
!-Zo f77aryyr: 1{nl,1, ,_;6: -a \
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PROJECT!
DATE SUBMITTED:
COMI{ENTS NEEDED BY!
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
tl lfw,9a^""b L
FIRE DEPARTI,TENT
Revlewed by:
comments:
PC}LICE DEPARTMENT
Revlewed by:
Date:
Date:
e3
revlaed 3/LL/9L
Lewed
0ot- {" Ft?d 4A 3.2q.?1
-ttF
o rf4VA' 4t,\
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
3',*U 1,xn tl SFo.
PUBLT. r{oRKs $
Revl.ewed by! Date:
coDments!
FIRE DEPART}'TENT .. 'Revlewed bYz /2" ' "tz- Date:
,!e
c,
PROJECT:
DATE SUBMITTED!
CO}IMENTS NEEDED BY:q'tl
comnenta:
, ) 6en -"'r'o ^'/c:' J- ouu
,,
- ''" A P'';" 3'"' '1
--) Qt2rot t-"'' /'/'
-->/
,*-, /L/.?./-6.4/
''/./1/ o .^/ ;:,-z "/o,c''tn,.-f
at'i-' 2.2 l,,1 /) .
: ) 44,'l-'7 :4'
()',1 i) r- .'a -i/t
/,r-. /L,,"u h*^ I ( c'(' "-''cll
PotICE DEPARTMENT zr/ ,, i . ,, ,.1'
R-vf etCd by z '7 '- *,7 'c' "+ ' Date:
Cornrnents:
revlged 3/LL/9L
0n{- {' Ft?4) 4A 8.27.?1
xoo
;'
e.
I ARTHURI.MEARS, P.E.,
Natural Hazar& Consultans
INC.
222 Earr Gothic Ave.
Gunniron, Colorado 8l 230
n3-&t-t86
september 15, 1,991
Mr. Steve Ri-den
Box 3230Vai1, CO 8L658
RE: iSipf Remodel , 3876 Lupine Drive, Vail. Avalanche, debris
flow -Er:n-il Rockfall considerations.
Dear Mr. Riden:
In response to your request, I have completed an evaluation of
avalanche, debris f1ow, and rockfall hazards to the above-
re,ferenced property. The objectives of my evaluation are:
a. To deterrnine the exposure and potential hazard; and
b. To determine if the proposed renodel (as specifj-ed
in your drawings of 8-25-91) wj,11 deflect avalanche or
rockfall onto adjacent ProPertY.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In summary, the proposed remodel can be designed, (as discussed
in detail below under nDESIGN MoDIFICATIoNSTT), so that adverse
deflection onto adjacent property will not occur. The proposed
remodel, with the design modifications, will in fact de-qree-sC any
potential problem with such deflection.
EXPOSURE TO SNOW AND DEBRIS AVALANCHES AND ROCKFALL
Exposure to the above geological processes was deterrnined during
ny site visit of 9/12/91. As specified in VaiI ordinance section
rb.es.osz (2), a single-farnily residence, such as the Sipf
property, need not be specially designed for geological hazards.
besign, however, must ensure that the hazard is not deflected
toward the public or private property of others.
, Snow Avalanchils. During extrene conditions (expected at return
1...............-\--periods of 25 years or nore) , sma1] wet or dry-f lowj-ng avafanches
dan ieach the sipf residence. They wi-11 produce impact loads on
exposed surfaces which will be well in excess of the lateral-
toaainq capacity of nornal wood-frarne structures. ExPosed walls,
doors, or windows may rupture as a result of avaLanche impact, .and aval.anche snow rnly enter the building. Avalanche debris wiII
be deposited against the uphill building surfaces and will remain
in place until it is removed or melts'
Mos llutint o Auhnches ' Arnloache Contrcl Engineeing
l Debris Avalanches. Debris avalanches, consisting of wet snow,
ffintrainedve9etativedebris,cana1soreachthe;;;k'walls of the existing house and remoder. Debris avalanches
aie -incf"ded with debris ilows at this site because they will- -
have si-milar effects. They are rnost likely during exceptionalJ-y
,.t-=pri"g runoff periods.- Tl" nost recenl period of widespread
a"uri! avilanching and flows in vai.l occurred during yayl-1984.
A local example ofr lupine Drive occurred approxinately 700 feet
to the southLast of tire Sipf property' Although debris
avalanches move slowly, they are destructive because a
considerable volume oi'solib debris (e.g. rocks, trees) , is
carried with the avalanche. Norrnal building wa1ls are not \
designed to resist the resulting forces, and substantral )destiuction would certainly occur if the building were reached' "
Rockfall. Rockfafl can originate frorn the limestone cliffs sorne
4Oo feet above the Sipf property, or from the steep slope . -imrnediately below theie Lfiits. Rockfall has occurred in the
past as evidenced by the large rocks (sorne of which are clearly'oi rocXfall origin)l tnat are scattered throughout the area.
Rotling and bouncing rocrs can damaged exposed surfaces through
impact and/or by penetrating wa1ls, windows, or doors'
The avalanche, debris f low, and rockfall processes described
above are not frequent; they probably will not occur more than
one or two times in a century at this location. However'
"*p"ri"n"e in this and sinil.lr areas and the field evidence
obiained during the site visit proves they are possible; they do
constitute a finite risk. This risk can be reduced by (a)
speciar design to resist avalanche and rockfall loads and (b) by
=LIf "drr"ation about the avalanche and rockfall phenomena so that
periods of activity can be forecast. Both a and rtbrr are
iecommended at this and sirnilar sites'
ADVERSE DEFLECTION
Neither snow or debris avalanches wiII be pushed onto -adjacent ,))public or private property as a result of the proposed remodel--tni= i" true becaui" tney-will reach the structure at smal1
vefocities and will irnneaiatety be stopped by (or penetrate) back
walls. However, rockfalf hazaid to the property located to the
northwest will be increased if snall rocks are deflected off the
proposed west wall (below the.new deck), and ro11 onto the
iajicent fot. This problern with deflection can be nitiga!"s_": \di3cussed below. sinilar deflection onto Lot L4a wiII not be a lproblen.
DESIGN MODIFICATIONS
The problern with adverse deflection of rockfall discussed above
"un t" rnitigated if a solid concrete wall (shown on the attached
drawing), i! Uuitt at the new northwest corner of the building.
Rn alternate type of wa]I design would also be feasibte if this
alternate wall llso resists the rockfall design parameters
,'
Ur""rrssed below. This waII should extend vertically up to the
deck level, (about 6 feet above grade), and away from the
building corner extending to the corner of the deck. The wall
must be designed to stop a rolling rock 2 feet in diameter
(approx. 70o 1bs), rolling at 20 feet per second.
Please contact ure if you have any questions.
Sincerefy,
CtlL"r4 ffie*no
Arthur I. Mears, P.E.
Avalanche-control engineer
.${
:.9 $€tdtlOEo.d
'-l H.E
t-l.-{ at).(d +)FO
${+
O .Fl..{ -Ct{ot{ t{rdd
c.-{ q)
Ft6d .'{qr&
J'
IJEo.ow. tJA .::
.. 'd .z'\
F{l O r.l--l :d SEI F'A>l d 'c!
HI €Jhlv
Cll
I
trl
a
:?
.i
l
t
l+
o
r
(
,t'
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJBCT:
MEMORAI{DIJM
Planning and Environmental C-ommission
Community Development Departrnent
Ocober L4,l9L
A rpquest for a setback variance for the SipfRcsidence,3876 Lupine Drive/Lot
14B, Block 1, Bighom 2nd Addition.
Applicants: Eric and Susan Sipf
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE VARIANCE REOI.]ESTED
The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to the existing single fanrily home on this
Foperty. The addition would be for the fint and second flmrs. The house, at this time, is
located within the l5-fmt side yard setback. The south elcvation of the house is
approximately 37 fent high and is set back 6 feet from the sidc propcrty line. fircre are
decks which surround the house which extend completely acrcss the side yard setback and in
one case, extend over the property line onto the neighbors' property. In ttrc rcmodeling
effort, the applicant would remove all of the existing decks. New decks would be addcd to
the r€ar of the house, which would meet the standards of the zoning code. Ther€ is also an
evergreen tree, approximately 6O feet tall, located about eight feet from the eastsm (fron$
side of the house.
There are two parts of the proposed construction which rcquirc side setback variances. The
first is an approximately 25 sq. ft. expansion to the entryway. The other is an exterior
staircase which wraps around the approximately 6Gfoot tall uec, and leads up to the entry. If
approved both portions of the dwelling would have a six-fmt side setback. In addition o the
25 sq. fr expansion to be made on the main floor for the entry, the lower floor will be
expanded by the same amount to march what will be above ir
tr. ZONING @NSIDERATIONS
Zone District Primary/Secondary Residential
Lot Size: 19,171 sq. ft.
Allowed Existing Prooosed
Heighu 33 ft. 34 ft. 24 ft
GRFA: 5,097 sq. ft. 2,925 sq. ft. 3,31 sq. ft"
Setbacks
Fronr 20 fL ll5 ft. 86 fr
Sides
North: 15 fL 34 fL 19 ft.
South: 15 ft. 6 ft. 6 n'
Rear: 15 ft. 104 ft. 87 ft.
Sitc Covcragc 3,994 sq. ft. 975 sq. ft. 1,819 sq. ft.
Parking: 3qpaces 3spaces 3spaces
* Ar€a of requested variance.
M. CRTERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060 of the Vail Municipal C-odc,
the C-ommunity Development Deparrnent recommends approval of the rcquested
variance based on the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other exi$ing or
potential uses and struc'tures in the vicinity.
Staff believes the proposed addition and removal of the decls will improve the
relationship between this structure and its neighbor o the south. Currcntly, the
decks ofthc house extend up to the southern property line an{ in one location,
cross it and extend into the neighbor's yard" Staff believes that the applicant
will reduce the amount of encroachment and improve the reluionship to the
surrounding strucnrcs by eliminating all of the decls on the southern sidc of
the house.
The rwo parts of the proposed addition which require a variancc are the
addition to the entry and the extcrior staircase. In the casc of the cxpansion to
the entry, the structure will be located undcrneath the existing rmfline and will
not require an expansion to the roof to cover ir Furthermore, this addition will
not be extended north of the existing building and would not roduce the
setback any morc than what it presently is.
The exterior staircase is the other pafi of the proposal which rcquircs a
variance. In a similar manner to the design of the expansion to thc entry, thc
staircase does not further encroach into the setback than dms the cxisting
house. The 6 ft. setback which currently exists would be maintafupd- Staff
believes the architect has minimized the amount of mass and bulk on-site
which is in the setback. During the review of this proposal, the staff rcquesed
that the size of the staircasc rmf be reduced and that thc stairway locuion
provide at least as much setback as the existing stnrcturc. These
recommendations having been incorporatcd into the dcsigr, staff believes the
rcmodeled structure will be an improvement over the existing relationship to
the surrounding arca.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation
and enforcenent of a specified regulation is neccssary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatmmt among sites in the
vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of
special privilege.
Staff believes the location of the existing structurc is a physical hardship. The
house is currently set back 6 feet frrom thc side property line; the roofeave has
a l.S-foot setback In addition to the location of the existing building, the
approximately 60-foot upe in front of the stnrcnre is also a constrainl The
architect needcd to provide exterior aceess to the second floor, but had lhrited
options due to the tree location. Because of the location of the trce and house,
areas for additions are located within the side yard setback. Staff believes that
relief from the strict interprctation of the setback requirement for thesc
components is appropriate to allow the expansion of the sructurc to take placc.
3. The effect of the requeSed variance on light and air, distributi<m of
population, transportation and traffc facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
Staff believes there will be no impacts from the Foposcd expansion on any of
the issues above.
B. The Plannins and Envilonmental Commission shall make the followine
findines beforc santine a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilcge inconsistent wittr the limitations on other propcrties classified
in the same districr
2. That the granting of the variancc will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or wclfare, m matcrially injruious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. Thu the variance is warranted for one tr morc of the following rcasqls:
& The strict literal interprctation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty tr unrcessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extrao'rdinary circumstances or
conditions applicable b the same site of the variance that do not
apply generally to other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict interprctation or enfscement of thc specffied
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges cnjoyed by
the owners of other properties in the same districr
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the variance, as wc feel it mects the critcria discussed above.
In addition, staff belicves the findings arc met. Specifrcally, Finding I is met, in staff s
opinion, as approval of this rcquest would not constitute a grant of special privilege. In other
cases, staff has recommended approval of variances based on the fact that the existing
building is already located in the setback, and the addition does not further reduce the
remaining setback. Finding 2 is met as the request would not affect public health, safegl or
welfarc. Finding 3(a) is met, in staffs opinion, as a strict interpretation of the setback
regulation would result in an unnecessary physical hardship. Staff believes that, because the
house was built 6 feet from the southern propcrty line, and bccause there is an approximately
6G'foot tall nee about eight feet from the northern elevation of the house, that there arca
physical constraints on the site. Based on the fact that the physical constraints limit the
design solutions, staff recommends approval of the request with the following conditions:
1. Prior to issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy, applicant shall pave the
entire driveway.
4
Prior to issuance of a final Certificatc of Occupancy, applicant shall plant I sprucc and
3 aspen between the proposed staircase and the str€et, and shall seed and rcgrade the
disturbcd portions of the site.
clpcc\ncoor\r$f.Ol,l
.\\|
----
/
leltol
lFt
lst
t'
l,iiltlt
$tiilii
I
I
I
t
I
Roie
^sGdq<d
e':f)iFis{rO-(t
\ak
r^iJ"
i
\
*
l- I
' :;:
;-+-.
'i
Ili-
I
I
I
/
ll
l
i
revised 6/t8/9t
DRB APPLICATION - TOWN OF VAIL.
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED :
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
COLORADO
****it****
THIS APPLICATTON NILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
I'NTTL ArL REQUIRED TNFORI{ATTON IS SUBMTTTED**t*****t*
PROJECT INFORMATION:
A. DESCRIPTIoN : PATTeOEL To 4 I PF IZE,aPAIW
Lu Oetvb V&{{_,, OO
trt-Oek- t 1V.slgar.t
B.TYPE OF REVIEWI
New Construction
Xooor.ron ($so. oo)
C. ADDRESS:7Z7A Lu '/1'/-'t4
D. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LoT
subdivj-si on fuhl@,4t Sftar€
If property is described by adescription, please provide onattach to this application.
($200.00)Minor Alteration ($20. 00)
Conceptual Review (S0)
Block
meets and bounds legaIa separate sheet and
E. ZONING:
LOT AREA: ff required, applicant must
stamped survey showing 1ot area.
H.
G.NA}IE OF APPLICANT:Mailing Address:
5/FF
O- Ba.< )?tl eA'/a
Phone +t - 4/7
NAIUE OF
M: i I i nrr
prov].e a-rrrranf
APPLICANT' S REPRESENTATIVE' e|?-o* Jht'ta A/2r/1, 4.t.AAddress no,P:x rzV{ th+W
FEE
$ 20.00
s s0.00
$100.00
$500,001 - $1,000,000$ Over $1,000,000
NAME OF OWNERS:AA/c ll ta,rty' ?f
*SIGNATURE (S) :Mailing Address:
Phone
J. Condominium Approval if applicable.
K. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid atthe tj-me of submittal of DRB application. Later, whenapplying for a building permiL, please identify the
accurat.e valuation of the proposal. ?he Town of Vailwill adjust the fee according to the table below, toensure the correct fee is pai.d.
FEE PAID: S
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATION
$ 0 - s 10,000$ 10,001 - $ 50,000s 50,001 - $ 150,000
$150,001 - $ 500,000 s?oo-00
$400.00
$500.00
*NO APPLTCETION TTLL BE PROCESSED WITHOUT OISNER'S SIGNATURE
II PRE-APPL ICATO\T MEETING :
A pre-application meeting with a member of the planning
staff is strongly encouraged to determine if any additional
application information is needed. It is the applicant's
responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to
delermine if there are additional submittal reguirements.
PLease note that a COMPLETE application wiII streaml-ine the
approval process for your project.
III. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
A. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the
applicant must stake and tape the project site to
indicate property lines, building lines and building
corners. At1 trees to be removed must be taped. All
site tapings and staking must be completed prior to the
DRB site visit. The applicant must ensure that staking
done durj-ng the winter is not buried by snow.
B. The review process for NEW BUILDINGS normally requires
two separate meetings of the Design Review Board: a
conceptual approval and a final approval. Applicants
should plan on presenting their development proposaL at
a mj-nimum of two meetings before obtaining final
approval.
C. Applicants who fail to appear before the Design Review
Board on their scheduLed meeting date and who have not
asked in advance that discussion on their iten be
n.'\qf n^np.l - will have their items removed fron the DRByvJ uyvr te v t 'docket until such tine as the item has been
republished.
The following i-tems may, at the discretion of the
zoning administrator' be approved by the Community
Development Department staff (i.e. a forrnal hearing
before the DRB may not be required) :
a. WJ.ndows, skylights and similar exterior changes
which do not alter the existing plane of the
h'. i Irlincr: :46tvgt+sarrY r g.r
b. Building addition proposals not visible from any
other l-ot or public space. At the time such a
proposal is submitted, applicants must include
fetters from adjacent property owners and/or fron
+l-\^ --^-+ €zrr nr mtn!arar nf :nrr ediaapnfLrrE cL\jErlL J-\Jr \.rr tttcalrqYE! v! qrri qsJuvv"e
condominium association stating the association
approves of the addition.
rf a property is focated in a mapped hazard area (i.e'
snow avalanche, rockfal1, ffood pfaj-n' debris flow,
wetland, etc) r a hazard study must be submitted and the
owner must sign an affidavit recognizing the hazard
report prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Applicants are encouraged to check with a Town Planner
','.i ",. f n DRR ennl.ication to determine the relationshipev s1\e srl/-
of the property to aI1 rnapped hazards.
For all residential construction:
Clearly indicate on the floor plans the insj-de
face of the exterior structural walls of the
building; andIndicate with a dashed line on the site plan a
four foot distance from the exterior face of the
building wal1s or supporting columns.
If DRB approves the applJ.cation with condj-tions or
rnodifications, all conditions of approval must be
roqnlved nri or ro Town issuance of a building permlt
n
IV.NEW coNsr*u.t*
A Three copies of a recent topoqraphic survev, stamped b'/
a licensed survevor, at a scale of l'" = 2Q' or larger,
on which the foll-owing information is provi.ded:
Lot area.
Two foot contour intervals unless the parcel
consists of 5 acres or morer in which case/ 5/
contour intervals may be accepted'
Existing trees or groups of trees having trunks
with diameters of 4" or more, as measured f rorn a
point one foot above grade.
Rock outcroppings and other significant natural
features (large boulders, intermittent streams,
etc. ) .
Hazard areas (avalanche, rockfall, etc.),
cenLerline of stream or creek, required creek or
stream setback' 100-year flood plain and slopes of
40? or more, if applicable.
Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS landmark
or sewer invert. This information should be
clearly stated on the survey so that all
measurements are based on the same starting point.
This is particularly important for height
measurement.s. See Policy On Survey Information,
for more information regarding surveys.
Locations of the following:
a. Size and type of drainage culverts, swales,
etc . must be shown.
b. Exact location of existing utility sources
and proposed service lines from their source
to the structure. Utilities to include:
/r-1- I ^ ,T'.t t\.CpIE I V
Telephone
Sewer
Water
GasElectri c
. prc,nertv Iines - distances and bearings and a! ! vFv! eJ
basis of bearing must be shown.
d. A11 easements (Title report must also include
c>ri st i no easement locations)
Existing and finished grades.
Provide spot elevations of the street, and a
minimum of one spot efevation on either side of
the lot, 25 feet out from the side property lines.
B qif a P l.an
1. Locations of the following:
a. Proposed surface drainage on and off site.
b. Proposed driveways. Percent slope and spot
elevations must be shown.
All existing improvements includlng structuresf
landscaped areas, servj-ce areas, storage areast
wa1ks, driveways, off-street parking, loading
areas, retaining walls (with top and bottom of
wal. l spot elevaiions) r and other existing site
i mn r,.-\iralnanf c
NCTE :
uloations of top of roof ridf (witn existinq
and proposed qrades shown underneath) . Theseelevations and grades must be provided in orderfor the staff to determine building height. AIIridge lines should be indicated on the sj.te p1an.Elevations for roof ridges shall also be indicatedon the site plan with corresponding finished andexisting grade elevations.
4. Driveway grades may not exceed 8t unless approved
Lrrr +lra 'Trar.rn [66.i 66a7-LrJ L.rrlt J. vwtt rJrrYrrrEEr .
Landscape Pl-an (7" = 20' or larger) - 3 copies reouired
The fol-lowing information must be provided on thelandscape plan. The location of existing 4"diameter or Iarger trees, the location, size,spacing and type (common and latin name) of allexisting and proposed plant materiaL. All treesto be saved and to be removed must afso beindicated. The plan must also differentiate
between existing and proposed vegetation.
Complete the attached landscape materials list.
3. The Location and type of existing and proposedwatering systems to be employed in caring forplant material- following its installation.
4, Existing and proposed contour lines.
In order to clarify the inter-relatj-on of the various
development proposal components, please incorporate as
much of the above information as possible onto the siteplan.
Siqn off from each utilitv companv verifying thel-ocation of utilicy service and availability (see
^+ r- ^^L^-l\q L Lq9llgLa / .
A nro I imin:rrr tit la rpnrrrt mrl qt -a....\mrrrnrr r'l l
submittals, to insure property ownership and location
^f -11 ^-^^-^-+ ^ur d-L-L edsernenLS on properEy.
Architectural Plans (L/8" = lt or larger, I/4,, ispreferred scale for review) 3 copies required.
1. Scal-ed ffoor plans and all elevations of theproposed development. Elevations must show bothexisting and finished grades.
2. One set of floor plans must be "red-fined" to show
how the gross residential floor area (GRFA) was
calcul-ated.
Reductions of all elevations and the site plan (8-t/2" x LL") for inclusion in PEC and/or Town
Council memos may be requested.
4. Exterior surfacing materials and material- col.orsshall be specified on the attached materials Iist.This materials list must. be completed andsubmitted as a part of DRB application. Colorchips, siding samples etc., should be presenred rothe Design Revj-ew Board meeting-
zone check list (attached) must be compLeted if projeccis focated within the Single-Family, Primary/Secondaryor Duplex zone districts.
Photos of the existJ-ng site and where applicable, ofadjacent structures.
n
H.
rne zonQ Administrator and/or oneGv require the
submission of additional p1ans, drawings,
specifications, samples and other materials (including
a model.) if deemed necessary to determine whether a
project will comply with Design Guidelines'
MINOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILD]NGS.
Photos or sketches which clearly convey the redevelopment
proposal and the location (site plan) of the redeveloprnent
proposal may be submitted in lieu of the more formal
requj.rements set forth above, provided all inportant
specifications for the proposal including cofors and
materials to be used are submitted.
VI . ADDITIONS _ RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL
vp,,vl,vaat-G, )A. Original floor plans with all specifications shown
\/
,'l tU Fn trttwu
ftwL -E:
D.
Three sets of proposed fLoor plans l/8" = L' or larger(I/4" = tt is preferred)
L-e. Three copies of a site plan showing existing and
nronosed eonstruction. Indicate roof ridge eLevations
with existing and proposed grades shown underneath.
"6. Elevations of proposed addition.
E. Photos of the existinq structure.
. F Sncnifir.:tions for all materials and cofor samples onvI/vvrmaterlals List (attached) .
At the request of the Zoning Administrator you may also be
required to submit:
G. A statement from each utility veri-fying locatj'on of
service and avaifability. See attached utility
focation verification form.
VH.A site improvemenL survey' stamped by registered
professional surveyor.
L.-4. A preliminary title report, to verify ownership of
property, which lists afI easements.
VIi. FINAL SITE PLAN
Once a building permit has been issued, and construction is
underway, and before the Building Department will schedule a
framing inspection, two copies of an ImProvement Location
Certificate survey (ILC) stamped by a registered
professional engineer must be submitted. The following
information must be provided on the ILC:
Building location (s) with ties to property corners,
i.e. distances and angles.
B. Building dimensions to the nearest tenth of a foot
A.
A11 utility service Iine as-builts, showing type of
material used, and size and exact Location of lines
Drainage as-bui1ts.
Basis of bearing to tie to sectlon corner.
All property pins are to be either found or set and
stated on improvement survey.
AlL easement s .
Building ffoor elevatlons and al-1
with existing and proposed grades
l ines .
roof ridge efevations
shown under the ricige
Submittal requirements: The owner or authorized agent
of lny project requiring design approval as prescribed
by this chapter may submit plans for conceptual review
by the Design Review Board to the Department of
Community Development. The conceptual review is
intended to give the applicant a basic understanding of
the compatibility of their proposal with the Town's
Design Guidelines. This procedure is recommended
primarily for applications more comPlex than single-
family and two-fanily residences. However, developers
of singte-family and two-family projects shall not be
excluded from the opportunity Lo request a conceptual
design review. Complete applications must be submitted
10 days prior to a scheduled DRB meeting.
The following information shall be submitted for a
conceptual review:
1. A conceptual site and landscape plan at a minir.um
scale of one inch equals twenty feett
2. Conceptual elevations showing exterior materials
and a description of the character of the proposed
structure or structures r'
3. Sufficient information to show the proposal
complies with the development standards of the
zone district. in which the project is to be
locat.ed (i.e. GRFA, site coverage calculations,
number of parking sPaces' etc.);
4. Completed DRB application form.
Procedure: Upon receipt of an application for
conceptual desj.gn review, the DePartment of Communlty
Develbpment shall- review the submitted material-s for
general compliance with the appropriate requirements of
ihe zoning code. If the proposal is in basic
compliance with the zoning code requirementsr the
proJect shall be forwarded to the DRB for conceptual
ieview. If the application is not generally in
cornpliance with zoning code requirements, the
application and submittal materials shatl be returned
tb- tne applicant with a wrj'Lten explanation as to why
the Community Oevelopment Department staff has found
fhe oroiect not to be in compliance with zoning codes.rv I,-requirements. Once a complete application has been
reieived, the DRB shall review the submitted conceptual
review application and supportingr material in order to
determine whether or not the project generalty complies
...i +L. +r-^ ;raaian 611.i delincs. The DRB dOeS not VOte Onwl LII Lrrg L,rED-LYrr Yur\-rEf f rrsr
conceptual reviews. The property owner or his
representative sha1l be present at Lhe DRB hearing.
I]
LIST OF MATERIALS
NAIqE OF PROJECT:5rF lnaee t--
LEGAL DESCRIPTTON:
STREET ADDRESS:
Lor /'BLocK t SUBDIVISION pz/O,/7antW 2
%a p.tut
DESCRIPTTON OF PROJECT:
The following information is
Review Board before a final
BUILDING I'{ATERIALS:
Roof
ai di nrr
Other walL Materials
Fascia
S offit s
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fi-ues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enc losures
Greenhouses
Ot her
LANDSCAPTNG: Name of
PLANT I'4ATERIALS:
required for submittal to the Designapproval can be given:
TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR
Paqafz f A4t+*tt dEb+e- ttz.?Vtzt-t-,
5fu aala -14 // /r9 ,
e/p//A-
CL/+t? t(/t-o t42/r'
lx 6tE'*,-t/,+/uPr4 L.
LUE/rE-
6Ee4te-
^,.A+1/RAC
6. A.y7tfau2ftD
Jfve ac'g2 llrl{
Botanical Namg
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REI'TOVED
7UaFL.
*Indicate caliper for deciduous trees. Minimum caliper for
deciduous trees is 2 inches. fndicate height for coniferoustrees. Minimum heiqht for coni,ferous trees is 6 feet,
f)o c i rrnor .
Phone:
PLANT UATEATI:
PROPOSED SHRUBS
Botanical- Name
fot"l
co**orlu*" ouantity Size*
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
*Indicate size
J \lcrI J.\Jlt.
of proposed shrubs.Mi-nimum size of shrubs is
Sguare Footaqe
GROUND COVERS
c.
soD /J.oPo
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRTGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (reLaining walLs, fences, swimmingpools, etc . ) P.Iease specify. Indj-cate heights of retainingwalls. Maximum height of walls within the front setback is3 feet. Maximum height of wal"l-s elsewhere on the DronFrrvis 5 feet.
4&a+q ^raf fa O/a{t? I Ftlf t.t/ //€/a/?r'
?
UTILITY LOCATION VERIFICATTON
SUBDIVI S ION
JOB NAME
LOT BLOCK FILING
AI.,) U.I(I. J D
The location and availability of utilities, whether they be ma:n
trunk t j-nes or proposed lines, must be approved and verified by
the following utitities for the accomPanying site p1an.
Authorized Siqnature
U. S. West Communications
1-800-922-198?
468-5860 or 949-4530
Publ.ic Service Company
Y4Y-J t6,]-
Gary HalI
H., l v Cross El ect riC ASSOC.
949-5892
Ted Husky/Michael Laverty
Heritage Cablevision T.V.
94 9-5s30
Steve Hl att
Upper Eagle Val1eY Water
& Sanitation District *
416-1484
Fred Hasfee
NOTE:
buildinopei . Astreet
cut permit must be obtained separately.
This form is to verify service availabifity and
location. This should be used in conjunction with
preparing your utility plan and scheduling
installations.
* please bring a site plan, floor plan, and elevations when
obtaining Upper Eagle VaIley Water & Sanitation signatures. Fire
flow needs must be addressed.
These verifications do not relieve the contractor of
his responsj-bility to obtain a street cut permit from
the To!',n of Vai1, Department of Public Works and to
obtain utilitv locations before diqqinq in.any public
;rght-of-wiy or easement in the Town of Vail. A
o
SFR
ZONE CHECK
FOR
, R, R P/S ZONE DISTRIC oTS
DATE:I. t. I _,.,LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lor. UL Block -..1: Ftl1ng il6/w z*/
ADDRESS:
owNER 6Pro I 6ua*u etFF
ARCHITECT la
r/a
//,71/ tt
PHONE
PHONE qq7-?/z/
ZONE DISTRICT
.E TlUgl.JJIiU U JIi
* *LOT SIZE
AIlowed
(30) (33)
Exi st inq
2(2
Proposed TotaI
> za'tryt <
7 l6',
tJa i rrlr t
Total GRFA
Dri marrr llRE A
v!vvr'\.e--r
Setback s
q i f o a ^\ro r: aro
T ^-..r^^-'. i ^^!dirLr>uoIJrrrY
Front
,b/gw*a
425 =
+425=
42t/7 zn1?.- zoltl
2Q'
15t
15'
(30 ) (s0 )
t6 /?t:7**Sides
Rear
I,;aLe r Course Setback
z
Retaining wa11 Heights
Parking
ct rr.!6 1-rad i t
Drive:
Vi ev,' Corridor Encroachment :
Envi ronment a1 /Haz ards :
,/\(300) (500))(e00) (1200)\/
Permitted SLope 8%
Date approved by Town
?, /6t a
Reqrd z
Actual Slope
Fl.1.ri noer.
Yes
1)
2)
No
Flood Plain
D6r/.6nf Q l arna /yo
Geologic Hazards
a) Snow AvaLanche
b) Rockfall yruil2tl rt^
c) Debris Flow tltu*
4) Wetlands /1/cr k-
Previous conditions of approval (check Property file)
Does this request involve a 250 Adciition? ,v-t
How much of the allowed 250 Addition is used with this requesL? ^v'-e
**Note: Under Sections 18.12.090 (B) and 18.13-080 (B) of the Municipal
code, lots zoned rwo Family and Primary,/secondary which are fess than
tsr0b0 sq. ft. in area may not construct a second dwelling unit. The
Comnuniry Development Deplrtment may granL an exception to_this
resLriction pro,rlded the applicant meets the criteria set forth under
secrions j-9.12.090 (B) ana f 8.13.080 (B) of the Municipal Code incJ,uding
permanently restricting the unit as a long-term rental unit for fuI1-
time employees of the Upper Eagle Valley.
10
. | , l.r- rr tt-r\rr tF|l t\,C, Lompany Ol Uallas
mitment for Titi e-rnsu ra nce
USLIFE Titlo Insurance company ol Dallas .herein called the company, tor valuable considoratiorr, hcreby commits to issu\ its policy or por-iciss of litla insurance' s3 idontified in schedule- A, in tavor of ths proposed Insured named in schedule A, sg ownar or m6rtgag€€ of tho astarcor intsro3t covorod hereby in the l8nd described or r€f€f.ad ro in schoduld A, upon paymgnt of the premiums and charg€s thsrgtor; all sublectto tho provisionr ot Schsdul€s A 8nd g 8nd to the Conditions 8nd Stiputations hersor.
This commirmenl shall b€ eftective only when^the idenlity of the proposed Insured and the amount ot the policy or policies committed ,orhavo b€eo insortod in scheduls A hereof by the company, either at rire rime of th6 issuEnce ol this comnrrmenr o. by subsequ6nr ondorsamsnt.This commitment is preliminsry to tho issuanco of such policy or policies of tirl6 insuranc€ 8nd s liabiliry 8nd obligation3 hcroundrrshall ceasa and tsrminato six (6) monlhs alror rhc cftective i"r" h"r"ot or when the poricy or policios commanod for shal i33ur, whrch€vc.fitll occuts' ptovided rhst thr tsilur! to i33uo-3uch pori"v oi p"li"ii" i! nor ih! tsult ot tha company. Thit commitmont thlll not ba vslidor binding until countor!lgned by sn suthorizod otticJr o, dg"nrl-' - -
?:??1'"',',j0",, sErTEMBER 9, t9B5 @ B:00a.m.
2. Policy or policis! to be issued:
A. ALTA Owncr'r Policy Proposod Intu.gd; Amount t
LUPINEHAUS PARTNERSHIP, A COLORA.DO GENEMI, PARTNERSHIP
8. ALTA Lorn Policy Proposed Insurcd: amounr f I 50 .0 00 . 00
THE H\'PIRE SAVINGS, BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
c.
Othor Chsrge3:
Cortiticate of taxos due
1 98 ,000 . 00
casr No. usg5_366 c3
Premium I 381 .90
(REISSUE MTE)
Premium i 4O-OO
Amgunt t ,. p.omium,
5.00
Survey ENDORSEI-{ENT FORM lOO 20.00
{..->/n),Additionsl charge
Additional charg€.........3 a. . (.t-!)
i;rJli"""tjil,1,li,lli""fflr["1nf* desc]ibsd or relgrred io in this commirmonr and coversd hsroin is roe rimpl' 8nd rirro rh'oro i!
RAYMOND D. DANTON
4. Tho land rotsrrcd to in this commitmont is describ€d ss follows:
TRACT A, SHAPIRO CHALET SUBDIVISION,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,I RECORDXDrN BooK 231 AT PAGE 288, I ne6urorvriiouOF LOT 14, BIGHORN.SUBDIVISION, SECON; ADDITION,
COUNTY OF EAGLE,
STATE OF COLORADO
Schedule 8-Soction I Frqui,emenlg
Th6lollowing aro tho rsquiromonts to be complied with:
llem (8) Psymont to or tot the account of ths grantors or mongagors ol iha tull consideration )or thXsrarc or intsr""l to bo inlurod.
ll€m (b) Prop€r instrumsnt(sl creating the estEte or int€rert to be iisured must bo oxscutod 8nd duly tilod for rscord. to-wii:
l.
2.
DEED FROM MYMOND D. DANTON TO LUPINEHAUS PARTNERSHIP, A coLoRADo GENEMLPARTNERSHIP, CONVEYING SUBJECT PNOPTNTI.
DEED OF TRUST FROM LUPINEHAUS PARTNERSHIP, A coLoRADo GENEML PARTNERSHIP ToTHE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY TON iTTN USE OF THE EMPIR; SAVINGS, BUILDINGAND LOAN ASSOCIATION TO SECURE THE S|.JM Or $TSO,OOO.OO.
4.
lff:13*r:g--?:.:r^t^r$t.o:^?E!l_0F rRUSr FRoM RAYMoND D. DANT0N ro rHEIly'lfj :X :i:l'"::uyy_ l9l_ rtn use or
-wr;;Ad;ii;;;0;idil'
H#;^i'r".Uur"if I\N I TL
I$',331 ?X.$l.lo;llg.gg l*::l*jl.Tu$:-:g, rsas AND nEioni"i-,,u*uARy 4,IN BOOK 406 AT PAGE 42 RECEPTION.NUMrNi':OZ:ZS.NorE: suBoRDrNATroN oF HOMESTEAD EXEMprroN RECORDED FEBRUARY 4, r9B5 rN BooK406 AT PAGE 43 RECEPTION NO.,SOI3iO.
PROOF OF PAYMENT OF TOWN OF VAIL TRANSFER TAX.
TRADE NAME AFFIDAVIT OR PARTNER'HIP AGREEMENT oF LUPINEHAU' PARTNER'HIP, ACOLOMDO GENEML PARTNERSHIP, IDENTIFYING THE PARTNERS THEREOF.
NOTE: THIS TRADE NA}',18 AFFIDAVIT MUST BE FILED WITII THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUESTATE OF COLORA.DO.
PUBLIC
SECURB
r 985
5.
FORM r05 (CO) 3Mt84KK
I
I
I
I
i Schodul! B-Scction 2 Ercoption3
Th6 policy or policiG to be i$uad
Company:
6. TAXES ANDIA,SSESSMB.ITS TOR THE YEAR 1983
PAYABLE.
7. THE EFFECT OF INCLUSION IN ANY GENEML
PROTECTIONT SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER
SERVICE OR STREET I.MPROVEMENT AREA.
rt
eYill contain
StrsrtAdd;$sof P-O-n t
rxcaptioru to tha ,otlowing unla'r tha stmc src di:posed of to lhs srtilftction of th.
l. Righl! of claimi ol partiar in possassion not shown by thc public records.
2. . Elsam6nt3. or claimr of easemonls, nol shown by thc public rocords.
3, Oiscraprncie!, conflicB In boundary lin6, rhortsgo in rrss, rncrorchmrnt3. and any trct' which r co.frct lurvGy and inrprclion ot
the pramirer would di8closo and which lre not lhown by thc public recordr.
4. Any lian, or righl to a lien. lor rGrvic€r, bbor or matlrid tberctoforu or hereaflcr lurnbhod, impolrd by law rnd nol lhown by lho
public r.cord!.
5, Delects, liens, anclmbrances. sdvorso claims or othar mattars, if any, created, lirst appGaring in tho public recordr or atlaching sub3a-
quant lo lh€ ollactive dato har€ol but prior lo lho dato thc propoSed insurcd acquires of rocord lor valuo iha sstDta oi intoralt or mongrge
thareon covsred by thi3 Commitmont.
Excoptions numbor€d ara hareby omi(ed.
%l!aL ! sl,g
8. RIGIIT OF A PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE
TEERETROM SHOUIJ THE SATIE BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT TIIE PREMISES
AS SET FORTII IN UNITED STATES PATENT AS RECORDED APRIL 28, 1900 IN BOOK 48
AT PAGE 477.
9. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES AND CANALS AS CONSTRUCTED BY TIIE AUTHORITY OF THE IJNITED
STATES AS RESERVED rN PATENT RECORDED ApRrL 28,1900 rN BoOK 48 Nt pAcE 477.
10. TEN PERCENT NON-PARTICIPATING ROYALTY TN AND TO PROCEEDS DERIVED FROM THE SALE OF
ANY MINEMLS OF WHATSOEVER KIND AND NATURE, PRODUCED AND I,IINED FROM SAID PREI{ISES,
AS RESERVED TO GUST KIAHTIPES By TNSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, L962 IN BOOK 166
AT PAGE 407, AND ANY ASSIGNMENTS TI{EREOF.
ll, RESTRICTIONS AS CONTAINED IN INSTRWENT RECoRDED DECEMBER 20, L962 rN BOOK 174
AT PAGE 403, AS A},ENDED BY INSTRUMEITIT RECORDED SEPTEIT'BER L9, 1962 IN SOOK 174 AT
PAGE 257, SAID RESIRICTToNS APPLJ TO BrcnORN SUBDMSTON, SECOND ADDITION.
12. RESTRICTIONS AS SET FORTH ON PLAT OF SHAPIRO CHALET SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN
BOOK 23I AT PAGE 288 AS FOLLOHS:
I) EACH LOT SHALL BE USED ONLY FOR ONE PRIVATE RESIDENCS, TO CONTAIN NOT MORE
THAN ONE SEPARA?E LIVING UNIT AS WELL AS ADEQUATE OFT STREET PARKING AREA FOR
SAUE.
2) NO ANIMALS, LIVESToCK, IIORSES oR PoULTRY oF ANY KIND SHALL BE KEPT, RAISED oR
BRED IN EXCEPT THAT DOGS, CATS AND HOUSEIIOLD ANIMALS MAY BE KEPT ONLY AS PEf,S.
IN THAT DOGS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO ROAM AT LARGE BUT UUST BE KEPT CONFINED
ON TO PROPERTY IN A REASONASLE MANNER.
Conditions and Stipulatlon3
I . Tho tarm "mortgag6," whon us.d herein, ahsll includo d€sd of trurt, l|u3! dood, or olhgr rocurlty insirumsnt,
2, ll ths proposcd Insured hag or acquires actual knowlodgc ol 8ny daloct, lien. encumbtEnca, edvor3r claim or olhor mtttar lffecling
tha $tslo or int6ro3i or mod9a96 lhereon covsred by fhis Commiim.nt othor thsn those shown in Schcdule B hsToof, rnd !h8ll fell to
disclose such knowledga to the CorDpany in writing. thr Compsny shall be roliawd from liability lor eny lo$ or damegc tqlulting from
any act of raliance heraon to lhe cxtant the Compeny ls prejudiced by failure to so disqlo3o such knowledgc. ll tha proposcd Insurcd
3hall discloso such knowlsdgo to ths Company, or il the Compriry otherwisa acquirag eclual knowl€dgo ol tny tuch dofocl, lisn, cncumbrancc,
rdwr$ claim or othff mattar, the Company et its option may emand Schadula B ot fii! Cominitmsnl rccordingl, bul auch tmcndmont
shell not relisvs tha Company lrom liability prsviously incurrad pursuanl to peragraph 3 of thsso Conditionr end Stipulations.
3. tiability ol the Company undar this Commi|mcnl sholl be only lc ths named proposed ln3urod and luch prrtlca Includsd undor lhe
delinition ol Insurod in tha form ol policy or polici€s committad tor and only lor actual lols incurred in ralianca hor6on in undertaking
in good faith (at to comply with tha requiremonls haraof, or (bl lo sllminatg oxcsptionr shown In Schedula B, or (cl to dcquiro or caQeto
tha €it5t6 of intarast or mortgag€ theraon covorod by this Commilmrnt. In no evant 3hall such liability arcosd lho smount itated in Schadulo
A lor the policy or poticis3 committod for 8nd such liability is subi€ct io lh6 inruring provisions, exclusion lrom cowrags, tnd tho Conditionr
and Stipulations of tho form ol pollcy or policica committad lor In favor of lha propo3td Insured which are heraby incorporatrd by taf€rorica
and arc medo a pen ot this Commitmonl 6xc6pt 6s ?xpressly modified harcin.
4. Any clalm of loss or dsm8go. whsth€i or not bassd on negligence, and which arkc! out of tho statur of th. iitlo to lhr osttlc or
Intef$t or tha lien ot tha inrurad morlgdg' covorad heroby or any rction assorting ch claim, rhall br r!3tricl6d to tht plovilionr 6nd
conditiona and rlipublionr of this commitmont.
lN WITNESS WHEREOF, tho Compsny hs3 causod this Commhmant fo bc signed end sealod, to bacomo valid when c.ountrrsigned by
an euthorirad otlicsr or agsnl of the Company, all in accordance ryith it! By-Laws. This Commltmant ls ctfoctivs 13 ol tho dats shown
In Schedulc A as "Ellcctiw Datc."
USLIFE TITLE INSURANCE Compeny ol Dallas,./-,,/iziru/-*?
AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS NOT YET DUE AND
OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, TIRE
DISTRICT OR INCLUS]ON IN ANY I'ATER
ISSUED AT:
USLIFE TITLE COMPANY OF COLORADO
P.O. BOX 5490
AVON, COLORADO 81620
303 949-1651
?rr-D"/'/€"r,"--l
Att.tl SacrGtr/f
'\-.'
{a
5ez-zfiPr erlz-
t%
TRACT A
?0
I heruby certl fy that thls fuprcy.nrnt locrtlon certlficate was prepared
for the lpftg6ge lender and the tltle lnsurance codpany r thrt lt is not I
land survey plat or l4rovemnt suryey plat, and that it is not to be relled
upon for the est blishEnt of fence, bulldlng, or other futur€ iryroyemntlines. I further certlfy that tJre llprovemnts on the above descrlb€d parcel
on thig date, except utllltlt connectlons, !rc entlrely within tie boundrrles
of the parcel . except as thfln, that ther€ aris no encroachmnts upon the
descrlbed prenlses by i4rcv€Ents on any adjolning prenises. except rs
indlcated, and that therc ls no appartnt evldence or slgn of any ersernt
c.ossing or burdenlng any part of sald parcel' excePt rs noted.
lhls certlflcate does not constltute a title search by Inter-llountaln Englnecrlng
to detenDine ownership or ease[ents of record, For all inforratlon regarding
easements, rl ghts-of{qy or tltle of record, Inter-}lountain Engl neerlng
relf ed upon Tlp Plot of B\GUORN SUBWSTON S@ND ADDITION Tom of
Voil, Eogle Courfi, Coloroda
LOT 15
I
\l
Accuracy of survey linrited by snow cover.
ut?t tottato Yll€t
L^XIIrOO. Cd-O. aolta
|:loar aar-orla
Surveyor tlo. 13901
$TICE: Accordlng to Colorado lar, you must comence
any legal actlon based upon any defect in this survey
wlthln three years after you flrst dlscover such defect.
In no event, may any action based upon such defect ln
thls survey be comenced more than ten years frcn the
date of the certlflcatlon shorn hereon.
o=o?,Si**." llnter-Mountain-:Li$!-
AEngtnecringud-
TRACT B
20,473 SQ. FT.
o.47 ACRES
ADD EAK rcOF A D&K
TRACT B, SHAHrc CHALET SUBAWSoN, ARESUBDMSTON
6 LOT t4, BtalffiIV gJBDtWStON SECOND ADD|T\ON,
---=:--::-
{
==-
I hereby certLfy that thLs Lmprovenent location certLfLcate ltas
prepared for the Dortgage lender and ttre tl.tle insurance cornpany,
that it Ls not a land survey plat or improvement survey plat, and
that it is not to be rell,ed upon for the establishnent of f,ence,building, or other future irnprovement llnes. I further certifythat the irnprovenents on the above descrlbed parcel on this date,
except utility conne,ctions, are entJ-rely within the boundarles ofparcel, except as shown, that there are no encroachments upon
the descrLbed prenises by improvernents on any adJoining prenlses,
except as indicated, and that there 1s no apparent evidence or
sign of any dasement crossLng or burdenLng any part of said
.^'!..ff parcel,. gxcept as noted -
This certiflcate does not constitute
MountaLn. Engineering to determine'
record, For aII inforrnatLon regardlngtitle of record, Inter-Mountain
oF Bt G H Oht'r susorvtot{ .sEcoND. ADolTl(
a title search by Inter-
ownership or easern6nts of
ights-of-way or
FINAL PLAT
<E:g ?,.,
Cpr^.,rcK !t ,ruru "{ ==
ba;i
'?'!;fi;br,,,$
\
EQ
| '" EU|LU|NG SETBACK.-_.-..- ,,'
EXIST'NG RTOGE
e._ r DAUK ______,/
/ELEVATroN a4sz.ot / /k /l/.
), d,-v..V r //S
N Z/'3/'OO'.z
ts' butt DtNG
tu,r,,r .t *' N I j l{ t)t A *\ uu / eY /\" ..i
c4, \- ^\
/
I
WOOD RETAINE
/5,
OF. ELEVATION
B-5.9.1
8386.23
838r.81
uurtLTi, ELEV= 84oo.78 --{lv c -------.--?o1
.$
Qru
+5qe-,\-E
t)< $ d\.il' ,/ .r* 1o ,,:,-r- n ,\'r / o' /J !.
{k' $i or / /i ..:)'.\ '\ t .^ /.s" v---- \, l;.
b
"rt
BASIS':.
MH
RIM
INV
'a;
€v\i /
.:)
3876 LUPINE DRIVE
-.\- --.-..--.-.- I
"""'E*- -J e.)
,O
must commencein this surveywithin three years after you first discover such deflct;
NOTICE: According to Colorado law you
any legal action based upon any def-ect
In-no event, may any action based uponthis survey be conmenced more than ten
the date of certification shown hereon.
any defect inyears from
b 92694s
P.O.|OI a . ..oalo t€TTtr,n{Ala m^o
AV$a. Oq.O. altto(ror, a.aa-Co?a
ultl tor
r.aa|o VAr,EaLrrEr(EO. Oq-O.aotll' Glort et}'or!.
IMPROVEMT .- LOCATION :CERTIFICAT
TRAOT..W-' -'" 'LOT ta 7"',.'
IGHORN . SWDIVISION '- S ECOND ADDITION
TowN oF VAtL' EAGLE COUNTi, COLoRADO
n /03/92
t" = 20'
\E
--tt!
d
m
IqL-Ot-'.h EI<X ft'tt Y rlm: 6l9s 1lri gl$H 8tl ; :f-rat
35
o.<1o.d8;9iioct>l7-ei'i =o."1
m
-.{
z
-tm
I
1l
1l
m
-
-t
@mx
m
i
oz
2
-1m
0I
m
N)
Ol
Z a'\
= --r
n
R<z\--{ :J
;>a)z--{ -9>
z;
1(-3<
1zoo
z;
3:
--t oo>nr
o
zA
7z>mon-t>of-
T
=m
--t
o
=2
m
T
z
T
z
-
m
rn
I
F
-11
t-r r-
m rrlU,Ao>'r
t
@-
r
'Tl
=z
(o
-
<nc
N)
o
Imt-
m ^€z
o
:l>
=m
9)z
Y
I4 E
lzo'n
F
m
I
=
ml-
m
--l
{z
oI
F
a
B
l l--llo
l€
t6
l<t>
I
=
p
I
Etrntr\)
t;
l€
lzo'n
t<
i
m
9)z
9
N+
I
I
=
Qo
-1.1
=
c)
--l
I
3
f-
m
<h
l
5._.t
z
m
-r
3
5
ID
5
a
P nrE
NTD
=FF
>=z
-
/.\ /1(, )'>r-t-
'Tt -IlOr-
z=9@z=ooz
T
rrt7
={
ctC]t\t('t )..@ j,:g*,,oa
ooza{Fco{oz
orr
l
z
a-
-o
mn
=-l
z
m
m
m
l< '
lz
lzl-r
t>1r
fio<>''lT
m
-l
€
_1-1
m
I-
<J)
O
-Tl
=
-
mr-
tg11zlrnml>3lP t-
l'Tl (/'l'no
lmT -l><l Y
la./12 Il--{o o
t==
lo-tl--..
Fl N
ttN
tF'r I
l;lIt- |l'll=ltrn It;j It-l
Nro "-rRi
io>nZO
-<z
oulan
o2
I
T<
=
H5E3a
4 d.3-; g
aJ XA-
o:tO-.<
Elssrouq=^-<-;-=o Y =o o9:.'< I {ro{ E o-'l=i*S,'';*6o
Hb *o -
=C = !r l
m +93 5i
5s;s€
P oo Ko
_rl
=amt-_Tl
Zl t-tQ
!: =;it :3
=r r-d;' F=atz6l'l
I
!mE
=-zo
t.ffrf trlll
A.
Appl I catl on
PEC ilEFTING DATE
APPTICATION FOR A VARIANCE
prccedure ls requlred for any proJect requestlng I varlance.not De accepted untll all Informatlon ls submltted.
NN'IE 0F APPLICANT Eric and Susan Sipf
ADDRESS 4265 South Bellaire Circle
The rppl I catl on
Enqlewood,CO. 80110 PHON E
B.I{AME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE st.-.. r^... pia-.
ADDRESS P.O-Box 3238,Vail,CO-81658
PHoNE e4e-412r
C. NAHE 0F ol.tNER(S)(type or prlnt Mr. and
s
ADDRESS
PHONE
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS 3876 tupine Dr. Vail,CO.
D.
Bellaire
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTT4/BBL OCK I FILING Bighorn 2nd addition
E. FEE S25o.oo
THE FEE MUST BE
YOUR PROPOSAL.
PNDJIJ+lqt cx #-l!'71/ raon 1-
PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPHENT DEPARTI.IEI{T liltt AccEPT
F. A'l ist of the names of owners of a'll property adjacent to the subJect property
INCLUDING PR0PERTY BEHIND AND ACR0SS STREETS, and their nailing addresses.
THE APPLICANT I.IILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT I.IAILINC ADDRESSES.
II. A PRE.APPLICATION CONFERENCE l.lITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED
TO.:DETERMINEIFANY'ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED. NO APPLICATION I{ILL BE
ACCEPTED UNLESS IT IS COPIPLETE (MUST INCLUDE ALL ITEMS REQUIRED 8Y THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR). IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO I,iAXT RN APPOINTI.IENT
UITH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIRE,IENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A EQXILETE APPLICATION }IILL STREAI,ILINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR'
YOUR PROJECT SV OTCTffiIfrFTHE NUI.IBER OF cONDITIoNs oF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING
AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION I'TAY STIPULATE. ALt CONDITIONS OF APPROVAI HUST BE
COMPLIED }IITH BEFORE A BUILDINC PER}IIT IS ISSTIED.
tlI. F0UR (4) C0PIES 0F THE F0LL0tltNG I'IUST BE SUBMITTED:
A. A I,'RITTEN STATEMENT 0F THE PRECISE ITATURE 0F THE VARTANCE REQUESTED AND THE
REGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT HUST ALSO ADDRESS:
l. The relationshlp of the requested varlance to'other existlng or potentlal. uses and structures In the vlcinlty.
. 2. The degree to which refief from the strrct or literal lnterpretatlon and
enforcement-of a-specified regulatlon ls necessary to achleie compatlblllt
and unlformlty of treatment among sltes ln the vlclnlty or to lttbin the
obJectives of this tltle wlthout-grant of speclal prlvllege.
3. The effect of the variance 0n light and air, distribution of populatlon'
transportation, traffic facilities, uti't ities, and public safety.
4. How your o
requ est conpl I es wl th Va.l 1 ' s Comp
o
rehe nslve Plan.
B. A topographlc and/or r-mprovement survey at-a scale of at.reast l- - 20' stampe,' bv a colorado ll.:rqu iu"reygr-tnciuoing-rociiilns-ir'arr.exrsting rmprove-ments, Includlng-grades ina-lievitions. "oitei-iilil.nis wnrcn musr be shownare parklng tnd,l:l9itg-areas'-lngress and egress, ilnir.pp.a areas andutillty and dralnage fiatures.
G. I llqg plan at l scare of at least 1,, . 20, showrng exlsilng and proposedbulldlngs. :^'-b'rrv orru PruPsseq
E.
F.
G.
lv.
If -thI-s appllcatl.o_n rgguires a aeparate revlew by any 1ocaf, State orFederal l9-ency-9!.h9r thin the Town'of vJrrl-tr,. "piri.iti"n fee sharr beincreased by $200.0.0. Exanpres of guch revie*r-."-v-r"ii"ae, but are noteItnited to: col.orado Department of lttghway acces-'p"iriit". Arny corps ofEngineers 404, etc.
The appllcant ehall.^be r-esponslble for. paylng any publishlng fees whlchare in excess of S_O!_o! !lt. appti_catJ.6n-fej. ie-,-"t the apptl_cant,srequest, 3ny matter ls postponea for hearlng, cau"rn!-the n,"iiJ-io-1.re-published, then, the entile fee for such rt_pubUcairon "h;1t;.-;";;by the apptlcant.
Appllcations deemed_ by the connrunlty Deveropnrent Department to have?:gllffg.nt desLgn, Iand use or other is""e" "fricfr."y-i'..r" a sfgnlffcanihpact on the comnunity may regulre revlew by consuriinis other ir,.n-i""nstaff, should a determination be made by tlie i"*"-"-i"ir that an outsideconsultant ls needed to revlew Sny.applrqltlon, ir- -onwrunrty o.""iof.-nimay hire an outslde consultant. -if snatt esti.ate- ii.,t "*ount of monevnecessaly..to pay, hlm or her and thr.s amount shalr ue roiraiJ"J-to-liiTown by the applrcant at the time he fire! r,i" -afprication with theggiryll:y Develop.ment Department. upon comprerion 3i tr,e revlew of theapprrcarron by the . consur-tant. ?ny of the funds forwarded uv it,"applicant. for palment of the consurtint which have nof been paid t'o th;consultant shall be returned to the epplica-nt. u"pensls incu-rred ;t a;;Town in excess of the amount forwarde-d-by the apprici"i sharr be piia-i"the Town by the applicant withrn 30 dayi ot noiit-i-ciiion by the Town.
D' At preilmrn."v !:i1glp-glgylllgns and-froor plans suffrcrent to Indrcate:li,tlffi":ll"ilB;lElil;Tg:'lil:e, scare ana Lse.ofiir uuiiir"i,'.ii'!p .",
A preliminary tltle report to verlfy ownershlp and easemenis
If thg proposal ls located ln a multl:family developmentassociation, then written approvai iiom-ttre'"sroiiilTin'projebt must be received bv'i Ouiy iui'trorizeO agent for
Any additi.onal materiar necessary for the revrew of thedetermined by the zoning ajriniii"iior..
Tlme Requirments
The Planning hnd Envlronmental Commisslon meetsof each month. A complete application form and(as described above) inust Ue'iuUmiiteJ a minimumyrL
-
pub I i c heari ng. No i ncompl ete app.l i cati onsadministrator) will be accepted by the planningnated submittal date.
* For lnterior modlfications, an lmprovement survey and slte plan nay bewaived by the zoning aOminisiiator.-
whlch has a homeownerslIn support of thesaid association.
application as
on_the Znd and 4th llondaysall accompanying materlai
.of 4 weeks prlor to the date of the(as-determined by the zoningstaff before or after the disig-
J A M E S .llD E
POST OFFICE BOX 3238vAtL, co.81658
949-4r2L
Sept.15,l99l
Planning and Enviromental Commission
Dept of Conmunity Development
Town of VailVaiI,CO. 81657
Attn; Ur.Andrew KDutson
RE: Sipf residence
Dear flr - Knutson!tr. and llrs- Bric Sipf have asked me to reguest
a varience to the Town of Vail zoning ordiance
18.13-060 concerning the set back from the sidelot of fifteen(ls) feet.
The Sipfrs intend to remode1 there existing
residence and since the residence is currently
non-conforning the renodel must also occur yithin
the required setback.
The potion of the remodel that is to be constructedwithin the setback has been d.esigned to best preserve
the veiws of ttre adjacent property oyner and to
avoid the reuroval of a very large evergreen tree(50-69feet) imediatly in front of the present
structure. The reuodel also includes the removalof all-the presentl-y encroaching decks off theexisting structure.It is their intent not to exceed the limitsof the existing encroachnent and only so with
an apporpiate entry (approx-30sf) and a coveredstair leading to the entry (Approx.l0Osf of coveredstair actually is encroaching)-
Should there be any questions in regardsto this matter please contact this office at once.
Regards;
. MEMBER OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS.
fEN.l AMES,.IIDE
=- POST OFFICE BO){ 3238 ---------v A I L, __c__Q__.___8__1__6_5 8 949-4r2L
Sept.15, l99I
Dept.of Comnunity Development
Town of VaiIVail,CO. 81658
Attn: Andrew Knutson
RE: Sipf Residence
Dear Andy,
The following is a list of the adjacent property
owners i
Lot tract B Bighorn 2nd AdditionI{-E Stewart
1-30-8 Okasawa
Setagaya-ku
Tokyo 158
ilapan(local; 3880 Lupine Dr.Vail,CO.81658
Lot 12 Blk I Bighorn 2nd
Richard and Celia Norris
3838 Bridge RoadVail,CO. 81657Lot 13 Blk I Bighorn 2nd
Susan Kopff
c,/o Susan Snow
417 Brentwood BIvd.tafayette I"A. 70503LotI5 Blk I Bighorn 2nd
C-Stanley and B.lttarcia Wilson
5455 W-Jewel Ave-
Lakwood,Co. 80232Lot 6 Blk I Bighorn l-st AdditionCarrol Sam Tyler
3877 Lupine DR.Vail,CO- 81557tot 7 B1k I Bighorn 1st addition
Karen B- Barrett
1397 Vail Valley Dr-
. MEMBER OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS.
o(,o>oEoU c,lF.Ftc>o Po Llt +,EI rJEErrr€l,OCl (,IFL|J .n: olF.F ut tt.a.,t 0U|.}TL€LE=998.FOttti
=UoC'.!r|,|CtrEtTlJ.FO!|Cl.,t ct+, o.l}!LI |u+' E|'6ttur!t|!.cL(u4>r.F lrl +, g
€ E:s e!!EC'COcroo>oEr- CL eo=L+|tro(J T' (' I'.Ft +, (' lJ +,o orF ca.PU|€>c,r'
-E - F'EE€ L c''t-.F C ro >tr a,EO(|,ttt !!.F>rEC|{!o+, 4lct(,uo.(J€(t|+r>.rO
F€(U>+t|g+' > L.. 'ctr o, 5 rFEloc vro(J F.F c'-ECUtoF >i.P +.lrCtC-Ct€- G trr+rtl
..4
Ito+,
E
o
L5q
tFo
IJ|qL5(Jo
[4o
=
e
t-.()
-J
r()
l-..(}
-J
o-l-o
aI5
.tt
EctJ
!tg
ll
Gtlod.
(q
tts
?
"'t
L{, Er!t atl, {,Eg-Pg 5€ b€FC€L .P CtLE -oiDo.-!' E -- SflE'E=E539 -Rgt3.=tBtE..,fl S'EF(I' vr Lr.ct o c|'a |!' E o--LrCt O.L C!!, Ol .lJ Cl alr>-E! .ts'Eq'll|tt c+c-.}l FUrE x> t.u-\,g"E"€*,to5d €EgFl.rELEC.c,rLlrl=.,-8,'Eg=g 8EE t€=d.ParF to+r.cvr E .r, c+Gtc lF-o-(,ec cFd-a|J..P l!tllEctvr;- .Pa+ >,r t- C'.,+{ FgstrFS c't >rL !(t :rtF 3>F 6P.€-CF (' A +r .} .! c)^tg.€3-gE-bS.=.TB.,c'+, t:F C l| tlOLUIUU !c|+rc'+|,t< Ll.|. (|,aA!to Ecguo a a)-.E{rc rto Fc o c>G'(,r6 .+, o|oo - !r .H=,c aDr o L''lrE F !t \J+, .'.S0,L(lttF|, c,l.-'rtL+r+EG a>L| F c'!t|')ut|!tta, o oL +, iJ lliOatFF > -L:\ it F{rc'-F r c!' o c| o, c'+, ct .P L aJ-t L Et.! E (I':aE.,boE3-=g='btqlsE;;t868.3 E;ts6OF !t (, c, {|A vt Cl t..,>.1, rn c.C c+, .P a! rF +, E o<ct lr.P E E O r{,FFIPE*-8iEE-;E-=,s:HEEa.Eici EHi6s
=;SCSElFga E:;t{
;E-'3i*,8.3-E 8E,I;E.€OLF(JO,cJ +r' C,vlc'{ -.JF C) -Cl ll, C, ,1 .! C 'lt L I l..|- \.o L (,lr X O.G !, o| ra-t'
F$EE€5".€:E *SfuEt9o.,!d?g5o,9,Etsoc,L>-cb+ruo. ! rFE E-.9c,€,.u .pl. .O.-F.O::
-E i '-o EEE - t El 9S'4f_ot o v, .tE P c ooE r:,13€ 6rF .F OF aF (r.1, o !|{rL.l, !,1 .C-€L(,t' c,E[r!, !t E1|,.PP |JFr' r^E Ol+r.--CLCC|C cr!€) ' |,lF'Sc'{Cr.FETFc,CI Gcl<|Or-9-. rFF 5F C' c| ttF (' F.P !| L)
ai
l--()<i
t.fla
."u.ffi
o$ \;x
^#ry,-.#
)
)
r^.-t.e
Qx
H;$t $r
$o
HI
I
I
rq
E
T
l.t
orr)
tl:
t
s
a
l
li
st{a
E
I
E
q.
>
-li
fl
=l
$
$
H
H
E
$
F
F
E
E
F$
It
FJrU
E6
b
P\IIq
Us
Hq
8q
o
.$
h.q
{
rli!
!!;i
ItII
J
I
,l!s
;Ht
:lll
t
CRE5S RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA
SIZE OF LOT 3 per- I ntet--Mc.uttrta i n Etrg itreer ing
ALLObIABLE 6RFA', per fc,rmula
ACTUALT after creditg as allswed
Cred i te
garage
mechan i ca I
claset
Total with
I"IAIN FLOOR LEVEL
Ex ist ing
Atr i um
Living roan
cr-ed i ts
furnace f lur
durmbwa i ter
cIc'setg
TEtaI wi th
SECOND FLOOR
Existing
LancJ ing tc
actual al l owed
P5?a I d
347.8new
60&.9 tota l 60t-t
66 50et5.94 eoo
crd i tg a I lc'wed
d i ffer enc e
+6.8
+1&
-114
eO:473 sq.ft
4teq7
4 ! 19e. 03
1441.43
9Be
390
3EO. e5
6€t
EI
lBeE. e5
e.9
9.
?r
1785. e5
?aa
93. e5
HnRt'ISHEET EELON:
BROUND FLOOR LEVEL
E>risting hause incl.l-car gat-age area 915.
Pc,rtion af E-car gar-age to be stutdio ares 9o.es
For-tion of E-car garage to remain garage e59.
liiln room 56.
New entr-y and epa room 365,34
Bedroom #4 additian 144.
New garage addition 347.S
Total without credits AI7?.3r
L
Entryway landing
Frane-out c'ver spa rootn do6rs
Tatal without credi tg allawed
( counted ground f 1c'c,r )
{ cc,r-nrted qrclrnd f loar )
actual al lawed diffesrence
3t t14 -€t3
cred i ts al lowed
geccnd f Irc,l-
Total withaut creditg 1065. e5
83.
?.9I
965. 35
1441 .43
1795. e5
965.35
419e , 03
Cred i ts
c losets
actual
145
al ltrwed d i fferencegA +6e
f .p.f lup couurted main f Ioat-
fnr-nace f lu:, cournted gr-ound f loor-
dumbwat ter- r courtted ground f Ioot-
stairway urpr (ccuurted fiain f loor)
Iatal with credits alluwed
TTITALS:
6r-c,und F I asr
l"lain FInc.r-
Second Floor
Tc,tal GRFA
l
I
I
I
I
o
INDEX OF FAGES
Page I of P
- 1. FROPOSED SITE FLAN (Direct overlay of Inter-l.lountain
. ] Tepographic Survey with eite infornation)
- e. EXISTINE FRONT (North) ELEVATION
3. PROPOSED FRONT (North) ELEVATIT]N
4. EXISTXNG I.IEST ELEVATIT]N
5. PRtrPBE}ED I"IEST ELEVATION
6. EXISTING EAST ELEVATIT]N
7. FROPASED EAST ELEVATIT]N
A. EXISTING SOUTH (Rear) ELEVATION
9. PRIIPUSED SBUTH (Rear) ELEVATIT]N
10. EXISTING EROUND FLOOR PLAN
11. PRtrPtlsED gROUND FLOOR PLAN
le. ENTRY DETAILS (Flan enlarged, / BEDROtrM & BATH *4
13, sPA ROOI'! DETAILS / EENERAL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
14. FOUNDATION PLAN
15. FUUNDATION ELEVATIONS (Shewing effect of grede)
16. EXISTING HAIN FLOBR PLAN
17. PROPTISED t.tAIN FLOOR FLAN
18. ATRIUM AND LIVING ROtrI'I INTERIOR ELEVATITNSI
DETA ILSi ( inc l. HI NDETJSi )
19. LIVINE RtrtrH AND ENTRY INTERIOR ELEVATIONSI
DETAILS ( inc I . tllNDOHE| )
EO. KITCHEN DETAILS
81. }IAIN FLI]T]R UTILITY DETAILS
EE. EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN
A3. PROPtrSED SECTIND FLtrT]R PLAN
84. BATH II3 / SECOND FLOOR DETAILS & BATH *1
e5. nn0F FLAN wl DETAILS
86. GRADE AND DRAINAGE PL-AN
87. LANI}5CAFFING FLAN
\