HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocuments & Plans - 1976-2003Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel : 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co. us
Project Name: Brodziak and Bossak re-roof DRB Number: DR8030370
Project Description:
re-roof e,xisting asphalt with standing seam metal roof
Pafticipants:
OWNER BRODZIAK, JANE M. - BOSSACK,09|O2|2003 Phone:
4406 COLUMBINE DR
VAIL CO
81557
License:
APPUCANT BRODZIAK, JANE M. - BOSSACK,09|02|2003 Phone:
4405 COLUMBINE DR
VAIL CO
81657
License:
CONTMCTOR TCC CONTMCTORS, INC. 0910212003 Phone:
P,O. BOX 1822
AVON, CO
81620
License: 540-8
Project Address: 21406 COLUMBINE DR VAIL Location:
Legal Description: Lot: 12 Block: 4 Subdivision: BIGHORN 3RD ADDHON
Parcel Number: 2L0LL220I020
Comments: see conditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTTON
Motion By: Action: STAFFAPR
Second By:Vote: Date of Approval: 09109/2003
Conditions:
Cond: B
(P|-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(P|-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: CON0006112
The applicant shall use Ultr-clad's "taupe" colored standing seam roofing.
o
DRB Fee Paid: $20.00
o
C-ampbell Planner: Warren
I
1
Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2t39 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
General Information:
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please
refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The
project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within
one year of the approval.
Request:
Location of the proposaf: r-ot' ld, a n*,: .4 subdivision: flq$rn F ill,ffiu^
.(
Physical Address:
Parcel No.:
Name(s) of Owner(s):
Mailing Address:
Owner(s) Signature(s
Name of Applicant:
Mailing Address:
(Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
471{1rc
Type of Review and Fee:
tr Signs
tl Conceotual Review
New Construction
Addition
Minor Alteration
( m u lti-fa m i lylcom mercia | )
Minor Alteration
(single-family/d u plex)
Changes to Approved Plans
Separation Request
tr
D
!
\
t\l
tr
tr
$20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the / - l, "1;Design Review Board. -l e (r>'.' i
No Fee
,zrr<1,.r,.< llf ,rOo,*
t1 L
CDI r*brnu
Cot\4
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot oftotal sign area.
No Fee
$650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.
$300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
$250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvemenG, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
w€l
KYIUAR 5OO' or
HYLAR SOOO@
PRE-FTIUISHED STEEL
AND ALUMINUM FLAT
SHEETS AIUD COIL
CIWG coATED I^ETAL, e,ouP*L;Maz coATED rvETALs eFtouP* * oenotes pnemium color
Standing Seam Boofing . Architectural Trim^. Roof Flashings . Storefront . Curtain Wall 3
9one White
5andstone Almond
Matte 9lack Hartford Green Medium 9ronze Yorklown
Claaeic Green Hemloak Green
Terra Cotla Regal Red 5ierra fan
'Aged Copper
Colonial Red 9urgundy
'Champagne 'Silver Slate 6lue Royal 1lue
Test ASTM No.Galvanized Steel
And Galvalume'
Aluminum
Accelerated Weathering
(Dew Cycle Weatherometer)
ouv
Salt Spray
Humidity
Formability
Elongation over 1/8"
Cylindrical Mandrel
Pencil Hardness
Specular Gloss
lmpact Resistance
Falling Sand
Flame Test
ASTM D 3361
ASTM G 53
ASTM B 117
ASTM D 2247
ASTM D 4145
ASTM D 522
ASTM D 3363
ASTM D 523
ASTM D 2794
ASTM D 968
ASTM E 84
Hours: 1000 Total
Chalk: Rating 8
Color: 5AE Hunter Units Max
Hours: 2000 Total
Chalk: Rating 8
Color: 5AE Hunter Units Max
Hours:1000
Scribe: Rating 6, 1.46"
Field: Rating 10; No Blisters
Hours: 2000
Rating 10, No Blisters
No Tape Pick Off
No Cracking
No Loss of Adhesion
HB-2H
25-35 at 60'
3 x Metal Thickness in Inch-lb.
No Loss ot Adhesion
55 + 10 Liters
Class A Coating
Hours: 1000 Total
Chalk: Rating I
Color: sAE Hunter Units Max
Hours: 2000 Total
Chalk: Rating 8
Color: 5AE Hunter Units Max
Hours: 3000
Scribe: Rating 10, No Creepage
Field: Rating 10; No Blisters
Hours: 3000
Rating 10, No Blisters
No Tape Pick Off
No Cracking
No Loss of Adhesion
HB-2H
25-35 at 60'
1.5 x Metal Thickness in Inch-lb
No Loss of Adhesion
55 * 10 Liters
Class A Coating
Product Description
U LTRA-C LAD'- p re{i n ished metal f eatu res Val spar's
Fluropon@ full strength Kynar 500@ and Hylar 5000@ paint fin-
ishes. This high performance product provides the ultimate
resistance against fading and weathering Life expectancy is
20 years minimum. In addition to our standard colors, custom
colors are also available.
lnstallation
ULTBA-CLAD'- can be cut, formed, fabricated and
attached using hand or power tools. Fabrication and installa-
tion shall be in accordance with project drawings and specifi-
cations and conform to accepted sheet metal practices and
industry standards. Cutting edges should be kept sharp, clean
and properly aligned. Exercise caution during fabrication and
installation to avoid damage. Protective film must be removed
immediately after installation.
ULTtrA-CLAD'-
Color Samples
Colors shown represent the actual colors as accurate as mod-
ern printing technology will permit. Free metal samples are
available upon request. Additional custom colors are also
available upon request.
Maintenance
The full strength Kynar 500@ and Hylar 5000@ finish on
ULTRA-CLAD'-is a premium fluoropolymer finish and
does not require maintenance. lf cleaning is desired, use mild
soap and water followed by a clean water rinse.
KYNAR 5OO is a registered trademark of Elf Atochem Norlh America, lnc
HYLAH 50OO is a registered trademark of Ausimonl USA, lnc
GALVALUME is a regislered lndenark ot BIEC
Fluropon is a reEstered trademark ol The Valspar Corpoation
lJltra-Clad' is a trademark ol Coated Metals Group
Tolspdr
800 Watson Avenue, Madison, Wl 53713
Phone: 608-271 -9399 Fax. 608'27 1 -4729
Toll Free: 800-784-0356 C|VIG coArED METAL, GRouP-
75 south frontage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000 offlce ol communlty development
March 1-7, 1988
Ms. Ginny CuIp
Gore Range Properties, Inc.511 Lionshead MalI Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Lot 12, Block 4, Bighorn 3rd Addition Arnended ptat
Dear Ginny:
Thank you for subrnitting the inprovement location certificate for this lot. This tot is platted and is zoned as a singre family property. The owner does have the right to buird on the Iot, however, there are many site constraints whictr wourd need to be addressed. The site constraints include z
1. Moderate hazard debris flow impacts.
2. Mediun severity rockfall irnpacts.
3. The drainage easement for Bighorn Creek and stream setback of 30 feet from the centerline of the creek.
4. Utility easement on the south side of the property.
5. The reguired setbacks for the Town of vair which are 15 feet for side and rear setbacks and 20 feet for the front setback.
These site constraints wiII be a challenge to wishes to build on this property. ff you have questions, please feel free to call me. Good project.
the person who
any further Iuck with your
1 \o v2-2;2!Fi L-/
of{a1 C)
Irl =
i;Ft IJ v ar \J va\v jz,
vvv o 4t (t lA-
c
EE F
o
=o z
€
Fl
r{
r.
'l
F
o
€
€
(D x
a i I E€atiiEir "s_. I d :Er"f :{g.F-.
; I i ie;trliaa++ 6 & ?eesg.f5il;'i i € iF!*;;?;:
+ 5 F tr5irigili ; [ : 1*l+g.:eee
e f; e yrlai*€5e
E s f eeg$*eg;f
ifr ; r;*alu;
a i E iai€+E;i i 5 g s?3;afr;:3 3. 3' 64A';ed{{:i ; i r i€ililrs
+ LC 3isiiEFk : r: =EEIsls*H I 3. r€gaf[9e,
F,
P
ts
t\,Irt
o
9)
AI
tt | .c ttd l?r =t)1 (t l(\g
lQ s'l(\ -l,t "lon l-x.lJIl n IA, E.r- d tp l+3 FF U(D
t:, ;
t6" -.r- 5
(D
o
a
0.
€
D'
o
o o
-t
s.
3 |!tE t€a
rt\ ;t 59 l'3
lP-t-;t f l- =l<E l-l5 lo te FE P3
(og
lJs lJ (<
3 o'
.a'
o
6
o
I
g
F'!6
o
A'
.D
3
o 0
=t 3
6
9.o It
(D x E
o 6
ut^E:isiitliiiiii
iH i i +scqini:-iq5?r ;F i i ;1li4ai: ia;:* r o
dg, 1o ees3i6i:;€ij I E
3i;E;e:;3:r;* I{c,,"= g I
fli;git iliiiii i;i;q ; n r i=?ei Ii fiaqifl *i$*rr ; "
at (A
8E s*c)o,
$e 8?
93 rE H lJ I
o
MEMOMi'IDUM
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: Department of Cotnnunity Development
DATE: Decenber 9, 1976
RE: Request for Rezoning of Lots ll, 12 and .|3,
Block 4, and Lots I and 2, Block 6, Bighorn
Third Addit'ion
Major Bonnie 0,Leary, who owns Lots f2 and .|3, Block 4, Bighorn
Third Addition has requested that her property be rezoned from two-family
residential to single family residential zone, J.,q. Zarnowiecki and p.J.
l'lc'laughlin, who jointly own Lot ll, Block 4, Bighorn Third Addition which
ia adjacent to Major 0'Leary's lot, have requested that similar action be
taken on their lot. tlr. and Mrs, Ronald Kendricks, owners of Lots I and Z,
Block 6' Bighorn Third Addition -- the two other subdivided lots in this area --
have been notified of the proposed rezoning of the other lots and have not
expressed cbjection to the inclusion of their lots in the rezoning.
The requested rezonings are all in a contiguous, iso]ated area
on Columb'ine Road iust North of I-70 underpass, We feel that this area should
be treated as a who'le, due to its separation from adjoining areas by the new
interstate. The existing character of thjs area is small, single-fami'ly structures
on small lots, and we feel that the remaining buildable lots in this area should
conform with what is presently there. The size of the lots range from.l0l to .333
acreas, and we feel that single-fanrily structure are more appropriate for these
lots than duplexes. lle also feel that a'sjnrjlar policy should be considered for
Lot 14, Block 4, Bighorn Third Addition when and.if it is brought forth for a
resubdivision request
Page Two o
The reduction of densities is in line with the on-going
Growth Management Study. Since a whole area is being rezoned, we do not feel
that spot-zoning is occuring, For these reasons, the Department of Community
Development recormnends approval of the requested rezonings''
\
t-
{.&,O I i-L'
)'-' '0'&'P 0
(/Y
L
PUBLIC NOTICE
l.'' \,/-t
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a majority of the ovrners of Lots .|1, 12,
and .|3, Block 4, and Lots I and 2, Block 6, Bighorn 3rd Addition nu[
requested rezoning from the exist'ing two-fam'i1y residential zone district to
single-family residential. Resulting rezoning vrould reduce densi'ty from
l0 to 5 unjts. Application has been made in accordance with Section 2'1.500
of the Zon'ing Ordinance,Ordinance Irlo. B, Series of .l973.
ri Public Hearing was held on December 16,.l976 in accord with Section
21.400 of the Zon'ing Ordinance before the Town of Vail Plann'ing Commission.
Recommendation of the Planning Commission wjll be forwarded to the Town
Council for final decision on January .|8,'1977 at 7:30 PM in the Vail Municipal
Building.
TOI.JN OF VAIL
Zoning Administrator
Published in the Vail Trail December 24, 1976
OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY TREASURER
OF EAGLE COUNTY
EAGLE, COLORADO 81631
I'Iarch LO, L977
MaJor BonnLe Orl.eary, USAF, Ret.
L0235 East Evans Ave (104)
Denver, Colorado 80231
Dear Major Orl.eary:
In regards to your letter of March 8, L977, I can only assune
chat the zonlng has not changed ln your area as that ln the
Torm of Vall and the Cqrnty has nothing to do wlth the zoning
ln the Town. As for the dedicatlon of T.ot 12 to the Town we
have no knowledge of that. You would have to do thac yourself
on the part that you orrn. Ttre lncrease ln valuatlon was due to the
State Board of Equallzatlon order glven to our Assessor. Itre
Leglslature has glven 60 days from the tlme the notlce was mailed
to you fron this office to pay the flrst half without penaltles.
Slncerely,
Ilubert N. Peterson
Eagle County Treasurer
HNP/uw
\t Foa?| 9;| 2 t I tt L''| <o lotrr F!.- Er o I I _\- ,-\L/^f-- l{ X le.r tA. v I\ L/ H l(tF!-H 17 i5 Z i lr,. x o
-lo-^ v O TL\ E
16 vvv 9 l/f{ an l\ ? :s lc IED lF{IH lo It
OFi oo g-z
o
ia
a t o
P
:
P 5
=,t l(:
AOFI 05i
=qo 64F (D(!oe
d?io
<=.oeg
J-6 9^x .i;-(!gdg oJ
qlqq
=91 ori 3a:5 ofo
6oi6
6a
=9.
I oox
317 :1;(D 3i5:!
EEd;o.L s<946 F=i c-
ii;5-.L;F=o!1 e :'iP-:'o'86o lrro Ka--*i o;=.=
-f+
=6C<iloo dG o5.a s 8"F F"'doo-
:i',-Aj'-loq(n glc d l^ti 3 l<(D ?l3 0 6lo-
o
P.o.
=G
€
0t !It
o.
(D
o.
!c 6
o
D'
:J
o
DD o
(D
I
6
o
6
o
€q E
AI E (D
o
P
L (9.IJ
la
-
o
{
o
o o
!
D'
(9
(D
tr
.!
5
A'5 Q
s-,
1F
o F
o
UtA SE-6n s*
()d
9lo o>!o FS F3
'.*
FE
It= :r6 3;
o9 Eii
Nq KP
ct
oc
o
[5'
(9r l-;)l--l l(.'
I
E|9 (.a o s4 L?I o o
o €c- R 9g d e:5o i9 2'D=
=L dI ls
9 3 PE;d
3 i;i1=
! 3:ief;e
r 3E Hli
.6 i=i9;
2
o o
5
3 6'9.o
|D x t o
-l
t.,l
r
(D
p
(D
t9
€(!
t
(D
€.t .o
,tt
(D x
P p
rg
FJ
l$-
P
(g
lJ tr
0,
a.
h
\u2 4
>t
tcl
o El
o o
tr{o
o6
E
o o e z rl
>t
A'
J o
ao o5
of6
-h f'E
4..l .:5:o gq
9.7
ari o.r q,n
;o
'ct c 6
o
AI
o
z (\
F D
F
lo
I
!t
(o.IJ
la
o
45
E c
EO r{
o
Fl
o 2
r' p.
3t u5(D
tr<d
o(!a1
r€
O(9
EA
=.r
=E (D5,{e Eo
rl
I
i-l+--l ;;'l ql EI
I It
t!
@
I (D
@
I
gt
.D
(D
l!O
a'a
(! 6-.6'3 oa €'<
6_{50
3+o:t <!e
,;F
0)'tt at (DI
(9 x l!tu
oq
(a
(D
o
o
o
o
o
x
a.
P,o
J o
o (9
3.
a o
8
€
|!
o o
D'
(D
(D {o c
o
G
,tt
u
.H
;(.o
FI
ls'
o o
o
o ;qiE ?39 a Ela tt1€a I E:!r tsgla i: o D==:Jx i ry 13 <o 6.1
g EsEi; O
V 2"1'n E c€o Xo|j:{Z sl
E 1iefie O
E 39fi1i I l*'zT;t rl
:9 X={Tr
o
P.o
J (D
d
D
!o
D'
o o o
-l
Eqt
r
']
t
.D
@
(D
0
€(D
(D x
PUBLIC NOTICE
NSTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN Tl-lAT a nrajority of the owners of Lots ll, 12, and
13, Block 4, and Lots I and 2, Block 6, Bighorn 3rd Additjon have requested
rezoning fron the existing Two Family Residential zone district to single-family
residential. Resulting rezoning would reduce density from l0 to 5 units. Application
has been madeinaccordance withSection2l.500 of the Zoning Ordinance' Ordinance
No. 8, Series of 1973.
A Public Hearing will be he].d on December 9, 1976 in accord with
Section 21.400 of the Zoning Ordinance before the Town of Vail Planning Commission
at 3:00 P,M. in the Municipal Building. The decision of the Planning Comrnission
will be forwarded to the Tovln Council for final decision.
TOt,lN OF VAIL
DEPARTMENT OF COI'IMUNITY DEVELOPI4ENT
1 i,/ /rtt t l.n I z-. r :!.tt /J/i/tlA-J- tu/'U {Q rttz{-/
Diana S. Toughill r
Zoning Administrator
Published in the Vail Trail November l9' .|976
o
luwn
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-5613
office of the town manager
July 8, 1976
Mrs. Bonnie O'Leary
Major, USAF, Ret.
10235 East Evans Avenue (#LO4)
Denver, Colorado 8O231
Dear ilrs. O'Leary :
Thank you for your correspondence regarding the Bighorn Street
Improvement District. The address change has been made on
our records, and I will attempt to answer your other soncerns.
The improvement district has been set up on a unit basis.
Individuals are being assessed by the total number of living
units that could be built on their property under present
zoning. Your entire area, the remains of Block 4 and
Block 6, Bighorn 3rd Addition, is presently zoned Two Farnily
Residential. You are the owner of record of Lots 12 and 13,
Block 4, and are therefore being assessed for four units
because that is what you are allowed.
Under the present regulations, we must make the assessment
in this manner. The Council has stated, however, that they
will consider rezoning of properties and an adiustment in
assessments if rezoning is accomplished prior to completion
of the street improvement district. I suggest you contact
Mr. Jint Lamont, Di-rector of Community Development for the
Town of Vai1, to discuss the procedure and initiate whatever
action you desire. If there is a further problem with your
Lot 12 being unbuildable, that too can be considered. One
possibility might be to dedicate it to the Town for preservance
of open space.
In researching the ro1e, I find that all property owners in
the area have been assessed with the exception of the Bighorn
Water District. Lots I and 2, Block 6 are owned by R.B.
Kendrick; Lot 11, Block 4, by J.A. Zarnowiecki and L{claughlin;
Lots 12 and 13 by yourself; and Lot L4, Block 4 by Douglas
Iil. Borwick. AII of these lots are zoned Two Family Residential,
may have two living units constructed, and are being assessed
accordingly.
}ii;Bl"lJ?uo'T'
Page Two o
Eagle County records did not indicate either of the water
districts in Bighorn owning property, This is probably
due to the fact that they are tax exempt. Because of this,
the people preparing the assessment role did not pick them
up. IVe have decided, however', not to assess the water
districts, but to absorb their proportional cost in the
Town's share. Had they been assessed, the costs would have
come back to the individual property owners through thej-r
financial structure.
Current zoning within the Town of Vail requires newly constructed
homes, etc., to pave their driveways. The paving district
will pave a driveway apron from the .edge of asphalt to the
approximate property line at every location where an improve-
ment exists. This is not to bring everyone into compliance
with the new ordinance, &s the entire drj-veway will not be
paved, but to protect the edge of the new pavement. On-and-off
traffic tends to break down the edge of the asphalt if these
aprons are not provided. They will be required.
If you are interested, I can show you how your road, because
of its length and the number of people it serves, iS the
most expensive piece per capj-ta we have to do within the
district. I believe you are real1y getting a bargain by
being able to spread this cost out over the entj-re area. In
meetings with the East Vail Property Owners Association, this
subject was.discussed in length and it was finally agreed
to leave your street in the district, pave it, and let all
Bighorn residents share in the costs. I hope we can do this
and give you a product that will enhance your property.
I believe I have answered all your questions regarding the
pavj-ng district and would be more than happy to meet with
you on your next trip to Vail to discuss it further. IIay I
suggest that Vou, myself, and Jim Lamont discuss this and
your other concerns regarding the water district fence and
Cablt TV during your next visit to Vail.
Thank you for your lnterest.
Very truly yours,
DEPARTIUENT OF
KRR/j k
cc: Sam Maphis
Jim Lamont
Vail Torvn Council
Kent R.
Director
ii
I
I
I I
5
t i
t
a
I
o rl ll ll I
,r-
i:
),
"o
')1,:r
" :1rrtil
': I r! irr:r
i;rj','.,'- .-t1
I
.) *!
rri :i i r--r,i!? \{ L
MEMOMNDUM
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: Department of Conrnunity Development
DATE: December 9, 1976
RE: Request for Rezoning of Lots ll, 12 and .|3,
Block 4, and Lots I and 2, Block 6, Bighorn
Third Addition
vlajor Bonnie 0'Leary, who owns Lots f2 and 13, Brock 4, Bighorn
Third Addition has requested that her property be rezoned from two-family
residential to single family residential zone. J.A. Zarnowiecki and p.J.
l'lclaughlin, who jointly own Lot l'l , Block 4, Bighorn Third Addition which
ia adjacent to Major 0'Learyrs lot, have requested that similar action be
taken on their lot. lrlr. and Mrs, Ronald Kendricks, owners of Lots I and 2,
Block 6, Bighorn Third Addition -- the two other subdivjded lots'in thjs area --
have been notified of the proposed rezoning of the other lots and have not
expressed objection to the inclusion of their lots in the rezoning.
The requested rezonings are all in a contiguous, isolated area
on Columbine Road iust North of I-70 underpass, We feel that this area should
be treated as a whole, due to its separation from adjoining areas by the new
interstate. The existing character of this area is smail, single-family structures
on small lots, and we feel that the remaining buildable lots in this area should
confornt with what is presently there. The size of the lots range from .l0l to .333
acreas, and we feel that s'ingle-fanrily structure are more appropriate for these
lots than dup'lexes. tle also feel that a sim'ilar poi icy should be cons'idered for
Lot 14, Block 4, Bighorn Third Additjon when and if it is brought forth for a
resubdivi s'ion request.
Page Two a
The reduction of densities is in line with the on-going
Growth Management Study. since a whole area is being rezoned, we do not feel
that spot-zoning is occuring, For these reasons, the Department of community
Development recorumends approval of the requested rezonings''
MEMORAi'IDUM
T0: Planning Comnrission
FR0M: Department of Conynuni.ty Development
DATE: December 9, 1976
RE: Request for Rezoning of Lots ll, 12 and '13,
Block 4, and Lots I and 2, Block 6, Bighorn
Third Addition
l'laior Bonnie 0'Leary, who owns Lots l2 and .|3, Block 4, Bighorn
Third Addition has requested that her property be rezoned from two-fanriiy
residential to single family residential zone, J.A. Zarnowiecki and P.J.
Itlclaughlin, rvho iointly oln Lot ll, Block 4, Bighorn Third Addition wh'ich
ia adjacent to l'lajor 0'Leary's lot, have requested that similar action be
taken on the'ir lot. tt1r. and Mrs, Ronald Kendricks, olners of Lots I and 2,
Block 6, Bighorn Third Addition -- the two other subdivided lots in this area --
have been notified of the proposed rezon'ing of the other lots and have not
expressed objection to the inclusion of their lots in the rezoning.
The requested rezonings are all in a contiguous, jsolated area
on Columbine Road iust tlorth of I-70 underpass, l,,le feel that this area should
be treated as a vrhole, due to its separation from adjoining areas by the new
interstate- The existing character of this area is small, single-family structures
ott srttail lots, and we feel that the renrajning bujldable lots in this area should
confornt with r,rhat is presently there. The size of the lots range fronr .l0l to .333
acreas, and we feel that single-fanri1y structure c-rr0 ntore appropriate for these
lots than duplexes. l'le also feel that a s'irnilar pol icy should be cons'idered for
Lot .|4, Block 4, Bighorn Third Additjon rvhen and if it is brought forth for a
resubdivi sion request.
:
i
a t i
I
{!
I
, ge Two
I
o
The reduction of densities is in line with the on-going
Growth Management Study. Since a whole area is bding'rezoned' we do not feel
that spot-zoning is occuring. For these reasons, the Department of community
Development recommends approval of the requested rezonings.
MEMORAiiDUl.4
T0: Planning Commission
FR0l4: Department of Conmunity
DATE: December 9, 1976
RE: Request for Rezoning of
Block 4, and Lots I and
Third Addition
Devel opment
Lots II, '12 and l3,2, Block 6, Bighorn
ir ;l ;l tl
rl :i ii ri Ir
!'
i,rl tl
II rl
I I
t
i I
i t
I
:
!al
il
*l ;l
!l
:l ii
{i
t ir
f,tr
ri ti tl t!!l
li tl lr
a I
!f,
I
i I t
I
l'lajor Bonnie 0'Leary, who owns Lots 12 and .l3, Block 4, Bighorn
Th'ird Addjtion has requested that her property be rezoned from two-fanrily
residential to s'ing1e family residential zone. J.A. Zarnowiecki and P.J.
l'lciaughl in, rvho io'intly oln Lot ll, Block 4, B'ighorn Third Addition which
ia adiacent to l'lajor 0'Leary's lot, have requested that simjlar action be
taken on their lot. 1,1r. and Mrs, Ronald Kendricks, o!{ners of Lots I and 2,
Block 6, Bighorn Third Addition -- the two other subdivided lots in th'is area --
have been notified of the proposed rezoning of the other lots and have not
expressed objection to the inclusion of their lots in the rezoning.
The requested rezonings are all in a contiguous, isolated area
on Colunb'ine Road iust llorth of I-70 underpass, l,Je feel that this area should
be treated as a t^rhole, due. to'its separation from adjoining areas by the nerv
interstate. The existing characten of th'is area is small, single-family structures
on small lots, and tve feel that the remaining bu'ildable lots in this area should
confornt rvith rvhat is presently there. The size of the lots range from .'l0l to .333
acreas, and ive feel that single-fanrily structure are nlore appropriate for these
lots tlran duplexes. I'le also feel that a s jrnilar pol icy should be consjdered for
Lot .|4, Block 4, Bjghorn Third Addition rvhen and if it'is brought forth for a
resubdivi s ion reouest.
.,'t Page Two
The reduction of densities is in line with the on-going
Growth Management Study. Since a whole area is being' rezoned' we do not feel
that spot-zoning is occuring. For these reasons, the Department of Community
Development reconunends approval of the requested rezonings'
I
t'Bt l,r
L.
tr'-'o-'e'o-tt"
!i
!'t
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
PUBLIC NOTICE
at
Ir -'.'
/rl
N0TICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a majority of the ovrners of Lots ll, '12,
and .|3, Block 4, and Lots I and 2, Block 6, Bighorn 3rd Addition nu[
requested rezonjng from the ex'isting two-family residential zone district to
single-famjly residential. Resulting rezoning v,rould reduce density from
l0 to 5 unjts. Application has been made in accordance wjth Section 2.|.500
of the Zoni ng Ordinance, Ordinance I'lo. B, Series of 1973.
A Public Hearing rdas held on December .|6, 1976 in accord with Section
21.400 of the Zoning Ordinance before the Tovln of Vail Planning Comm'ission.
Recommendation of the Planning Commission will be forwarded to the Town
Council for final decisjon on January lB, 1977 at 7:30 PM in the Vail Municipal
Building.
T0l'lN 0F VAIL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Zoning Administrator
Published in the Vail Trail Decernber 24, 1976
APPL ICAT ION FOI? VAP IANCE
And/0r
CONDIIIONAL USE PERMIT
Ord i nance No. I ( Ser i es of 1973)
Publ ication Date
Hearing Fee
Appl ication Date
Heari ng Date
F i na I Dec i s i on date for Town Counc I I
(we)
(state) (City)
do hereby request permission to appear before
Comm i ss i on to req uest the fo | | ow i ng:
or | 7C0 H ulaaz- Sf.(Address)
?r , /Ueznb<-a-
-Phone
333 -lrDS
the Vail Planning
( ) Variance from Arfi ( X) Zoning Chanqe f rom ( ) Parking Variance
cle ,Section to_5tr('
( ) Conditional Use Permi t to al low
7one.In
fol lowing described pfoperty: lot/tract ,// , Block For the
Fi I ing
C I ea r I y
N umbe r
state pur ose and intent of this appl ication /u"l--
I
I
I
I
q
fl
I I
you feel is the basis for hardship in this case?
n8
/
Sig App I CANT
o
luwn u l|il
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-5613
July 15, 1976
office of the town manager
Itlajor Bonnie O'Leary
10235 East Evans Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80231
Re: Lots 12 and 13, Block 4, Bighorn Subdivisron Third Addition
Dear Major O'Leary:
In response to your letter of July L2 addressed to the Town
Council requesting rezoning of your two lots, I am enclosing
an application form for you to complete and return. The Town
has agreed to waive the hearing fee for the down-zoning as
it is also in the best interest of the Town to reduce density.
It is my understanding that you wish to rezone Lot 13, on
which your house is located from two-family to sj-ngIe family,
and Lot 12 from two-family to agricultural. llle also feel
that single-family residential is the best for the balance
of the neighborhood and therefore are requesting that adjoin-
ing property owners rezone their lots in the same manner.
If you have any questions, please give me a call or stop by
the office.
Sincerely,
DEP
ana S. Toughill
Zoning Admi-nistrato-r
cc: Kent Rose
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-5613
o
office of the town manager
August 5, L976
Ronald and Barbara Kendrick
Box 446 /. I Johnson, Kansas 6?855 QtO-11d'-2L14Ot
RE: Lots 1 and 2, Block 6, Blghorn Subdivision
Third Additi-on,
Dear Mr, and Mrs. Kendricks:
Major Bonnie O'Leary who owns lots 12 and 13, Block 4, Bighorn
Subdivision Third Addition has requested rezoning of her lot
from Two-family Residential to Single family Residential. We
are enclosing a copy of our response to her request.
We urge you to rezone your lots as well because we feel the
SFB zone is most desirable for these small lots. As a bonus,
your street assessment could be reduced by $I,100. If you agreel
please complete the enclosed request fot tezoning,
If you have any questions please give me a calI.
Sincerely,
DEPARTT{ENT OF COIJI.IUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Diana S, Toughill
Zoning Administrator
cc: Kent Rose
luwn
o
office of the town manager
August 5, L976
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(3031 476-5613
J.A. Zarnowiecki and P.J. Illcl,aughlin
6411 E. Co1fax Avenue
Denver, Colorado 8O22O
RE: Lot 11, Block 4, Bighorn subdivision Third Addition
Gentlemen:
Major Bonnie O'Leary who owns lots 12 and 13, Block 4, Bighorn
Subdivision Third Addition has requested rezoning of her lot
from Two-family Residential to Single family Residenti-al. We
are enclosi.ng a copy of our response to her request.
We urge you to tezone your lots as well because we feel the
SFR zone is most desirabl-e for these small lots. As a bonus,
your street assessment could be reduced by $1,100. If you agree,
please complete the enclosed request for rezoning.
If you have any questions please give me a caIl.
Sincerely,
DEPARTMENT OF COilTMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Diana S. Toughill
Zoning Administrator
cci Kent Rose
I
ry%rDc (r/ ry f?-,-?r.fi
,l/'u Mtl
o
/zurf n*
ltn /lar)
| "ru/7/b
E
(t*
/t
NoT a. t'lrl R
APPL ICAT IOI'I FOI? VAR IANCE
And/Or
CONTJ I I IONAL USE PERM IT
Ordlnance No. I (Serles of )913)
. Application o.t. O'?t,tO't?7C Publcation Dafe
Hear I ng 0afe Heari ng Fee
Flnag Decislon date for Town Councl I
I trc.l I
APp I
(State)(City)
: po. rS*- ti)?, Vaitt Co. Ele r? (q'ii -'iZts). ..r. --t- t t. .;/ -, a :- \ . . - - v. . -..do hereby requ-est peimission fo appear before the Vail Plannino
Comm i ss i on to req uest the fo | | ow i ng :
. ( ) Variance from Article
Zoning Change from Parking Variance Conditional Use Permit to al low
i n Zone.
For the fol low ing described property: Lot/tract /,/ J/3 , Blo.n 1_
Fi ling Number
Clearly state purpbse and ntent of th i s appl ication
A toT /2 ,t tt
(K
(
(
Phone ?f0-7???
/
I lO
U!4lha6ca /rt.^-
hardsh
Signature
tf,,/?7/ rlne Ar7'4/+re
PUBLIC NOTICE
NQTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TMT a nrajority of the owners of Lots ll, 12, and
13, Block 4, and Lots I and 2, Block 6, Bighorn 3rd Addition have requested
rezoning fronr the existing Two Family Residential zone district to single-family
residential. Resulting rezoning wou'ld reduce density from l0 to 5 units. Application
has been made in accordance with Section 21.500 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance
No. 8, Seri es of 'l 973.
A Public Hearing will be hel.d on December 9,'1976 in accord witlr
Section 21.400 of the Zoning Ordinance before the Town of Vajl Planning Commission
at 3:00 P.M. in the Municipal Building. The decision of the Planning Commission
will be forwarded to the Tovrn Council for final decision.
TOI,IN OF VAIL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPI'IENT
,r lL/. ////)/]nftJ /t;qlo,(/
Djana S. Toughill '
Zoni ng Adm'inistrator
Published in the Vail Trail November .|9, 1976
\
t I iil,bi g
E f o ts- hs I € \-,33'"='lFl < o
=!i3, lal o .
==d1 '7, i'17 lr h--- El a ?3d;'lll l,Fu 9 1L.e r'1S t b ij<cq-. g lh ti I F'i23: r l? i'
= ?o P_;EE 6 l" 6 o
9.5 +;1?=;tff I
{3P-t F lk vvv o i€ E: -i 1", .- '!3l( ? ,!3 "!l F +tF ;t o :I P = ,-l (DO
@oO 3a z (!6-a'3 s={-32 ,?s
B9
a{g
o
.DT
,l
D
o
X .!tu
6
Uq
Fr
.!
o
€
4
6 oc
It
I
|D
a
a E
19
rD a
c
x
o
o
€(D o
I
ro I
(D
o
o
I
I I
I
a
:t
o o
(D
q)
CL
=t
o
o
€
5
J o
o
(D
ts (o
lJ lf\lv
D
IE lc
Eg
l.F e
lc g,
FR
135 t+ui6
ftE lc ;'
s
(D
3.
o
q
I
o
o o
o
o
o E
@ .D
5 o
q
lql
o
@\
Nl
o silr''r Fg a cJ ?eg o--fo(,+ I fr:l
'5FE'i: o D=dels A
5 asEie o ; P35nl e4 o =o:t:r2 Ha
[ ]:iefie O
r 3g Hla (D l'=EioZ :9 < ={nr
o
It o
a o t
9)
o.
(D o
Ut Ut SE*8F gF
oo.9.F ot Io
"r3
itt 6'6
l-
FT lls o l\ 3 s;
o9
i\t t\- Q
.H
;(O
FJ
ls-
o o
!a t{o {
i,,
c 3 o 3
;(/t
r'l
E 4
r'NFtr (16lUel tn|onA.c A'.1HOdrir .i('c
Ct{.'lOr OOU..lOk6..{N+r.d!llddA duo>r€Ol.qOOC.-lo .CIJO(,)o:'!(DrPo !oA.bEo.,.{CtCAt\qc.c..{<sr0rc o.i{ron}a,Ed\O('o€(tou odr:.d2qJ4 NOI{HQIdOFA .ttE.AOr:A"r.A
-{CdO<..cOlot!{CrlJlrd ccdatl@crr{OOCo.{(ro.q{.,{NdFc
!Ln(^(n|!,{l{oo 0J.cu.AHt..{or}l/|rJ.dl:q.ts.oCt{O 60l-t.QH c\ONZAOOq,
".rdEcro}]oh{,..{HDo.q 6('0otu."icr|{{J or>po4s30 .ctEllzpo|l
.r{ q{>oAcd Olr(rsFlOO€Or r{tro,Jroo.cc OSEdfrlZur|lrl..{ooo(.)oco€O E{ t{ .rl D .'.1 q{ F{ Fl 4OdOOkO..{(JCOr,l(,OA
'4E.AElCq,ul.ctr tJO.ErUt.qCt,
rHO]J>HFlOlJCd
Ooo€'AoOA hA.ODdcr*l O...l.d(uA-aE.O odE5O..{C^OO.!.dC r6>Urot'l l!(l,c.Q&(lHt>.d 0, ..{. F: t o 15l{CdOdUrF{O lorocftccroa O.4N|dc).6t{O{j
(t
'rt r,(r€co od N ..1 Ui q, ET c|{c!0,..{ .A Or d C>Ct o!oo NA'NET}T fr .d .d {rcrooe4 l.4SLt!F.!€aJ(tlq 60c r{ 'i .d q O O .-}.
O .. +, O O d sO
s ]J i! 6 @ aJ tr AaO\O l. l{ '(, O ! .i (.r.d 6 At a < n {'l U! oo .(),rl .r)..{odltAooE\NlrSCNtr+JQ oooa C ..{ O C d 6)4 O rd t{ O O € (' dO 'dott.n.Aqr.do rJ .O < +t .A +J (td Qr .d C O rl C CO drLOf{Orlro('uto!oo(r€O.c6.drN ooAdioooN rJ ! d ..{ +J .o O F{.tt ..{oc(c
.JJ cF ! {J Er -O C ctrCrCC t! .d qJ a 6 ..1 A F.{ d.r{aB.d.-rtr..{{J 4 O .A O O e aO.A k d o p k d .6 !!d 5 A O O a A t{ O O€A O tr t] A O Add crq{o
odor€J N.q 'AOE r,E+JE ('0
-f!r!oo'H ooo c3n.ct rcFt6(u
.dE-AO dortN lrt{t{O Oq{Ok
N
(,o ,o
A
€!o
(t P .9 ' g'c '9 $.'AUr€11 O''!OCrs OT.ooCA.ACHOC..{01'C HlitO.dr!..{(JOOlr(DO cA..{rJNrnq{qZ|{NOAqO t.co-ooDaoro'EEo ooerq{!q{rtq{.'{otruloc.J.,E{t.rOOcCOC)o>('ocakor|!!.J.cdE('oo oFllrdoOkOA'A7JrQ'AA+rQ .4O.doqcrdg.t!Z(Jt{-19 !'OA+Ju)'cd>lrc|.lJ.d\0114 E> q b c . o ) t{ {, o o ts 6 o q A o c d (,)oorJ|l q |U .i a A a a .q t{ E E l! -Q 'A C, q Z E<z&Ad O ,q .d N O o tr rJ o. 4r r'l +J E .A (, t{ E Cl P{ O<tutH C .A .d H '{ O !C t{ > E E O A C(J O O . o C p O t q{ 6 o ,- F. o Cn o O O !E AZE<H 6 ''{ e O O rd C O O t o E Q o q E O (, .- O rr 2 + &'A o !'a E O c, > C'i o O aJ O tl{H rl(,Ht{f! -{ X p .A O t{ C O .d '.{ F "1 C t{ t{ O . tr>.{F{F{JO U. E O I !-rcaoH(, o c E o d o o o < .A c q ! o N. 3 (u c o I -HDIiOZEIF .A I a .d qr o E - 6 0, c q 14 | @:1-E{ oHicrd c a E |! +, o o E o o. z A A 6 ts .; .A ..1
t-A4''e4g:?&O€6-C$.AEOOH46Ooq I-- I!1 >Z t4 N C r tr lr ln Fl U4OO(JE o N .d Fa A € e o Q A o. o - o o -A E 0, 'l N d OOH &EizEl d O o
'
.i O O 0J r! .i & E< -d .A .d I l{ E o . iltrdsH k l! o € ? tt rt c (J k o 6 o < qr q > E l{Oq t{() E;lOz] .d .n C ts o > O O .- tr '4 :c ..{ q q zo Q e*e<4zo (, r0 o'{ a dto d t 6 €{ F o o rs o a o t{'.7f. U Hf{H .d c .t c q -a 0J c c .e o o H c, o o o l{ 4 HOOOZSiZ,E< q r{ i 6 i! O u{ lr "r d O (J _- o. 0l O k qr 'H (J9 '.:s,*.to6,2 d1 q o d c E o r,1 O o E F u o C z-A Ofq OOlr rI O A U i r{ tr C tU C C' a C C € O .J F C E -a O 4rr rr tJ :Ecot4 t'l +r o o 3 0, .Q 6 E o ! o 4 4 0 '! c q zo !,)zz -oHzl o .,{ o g o o 0, d d (', o N r l( -d q €{ q A F o HU) gOOoHU:d E tr i O o €< n u .- tu o F o l'] a O o .'{ .i |! '.{a HNdrolrt -Z +, N rd - +, u c li t4 A q CJ E o .{ at c( r,:H C..H - .tt 0, O O 0, O CJ ! O O O , $ E ll C A 6 o ()Ht:o - a c e c x c E > d c a E o E o l,r c, o c JJ o 2 rt i',Odiaet<A O F{ r! -l 'A I 6 O lJ rr Fr u D l'l (J 0J O 0l "{4oHa ;.rri;a - .J i d a - & 1 E tr b (' 4 -r ,a4t. - xHt i r .J s c r q .e - € O - rJ rl] a o .ct .4 tr I a , H r. .t)82- U| o qJ (, o o tU a (/) O E .t O :C H E C E ..{ al A orlri:Noci.l(, < A x k 4 o o d < ! rJ r( o E 4 Er 0l D tr E ! d t4zOAAv.Oz ti O r. Lt O .{ .A ti CJ l,l L > E '! o .J o --OOH trl HH d - o t & u +, .J P & tt O E o r (t t N q ()Ul . OaZ !: O A (, ad C k .6 tr J,l .i +r ld a ?- l\ ^ (t E s -zaJAa.SqlO :E d El E d 0,, .c c, ;c o iE c o o A o o c, c o l,4urXANlrdN 3 d q, B tr' o. ., o 7 C n is .'{ Z E (,, ,C d .d 't.t{,.{O.;OC7r.A9l.lf
oor!€Lu\oooozrrruoo AAkocor.A.AOlrlq{€('0t OqO'ec a+rAHOOOOCA'.4 udo€.rddAr.{o.dq!!!,.c.Aor.Ao>aorHoodF,>k .t!!!:dcrA.Ao.Eolo.AEoru Ad.dna.iAAHOO.6r{OtrJr.,A.'oCtrfr,.Ao.o!.A!ro9 oNdOr.{Odt!o.E'J{Sq-{ aOO.L >F{< N o r.tr >'! +, o rt o.rq l{ (' A
*:.:J<i:-i.E:--.---:
\r
PUBLIC NOTICE
N0TICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a rnajority of the owners of Lots ll,.|2,
and .l3, Block 4, and Lots I and 2, Block 6, Bighorn 3rd Addition have
requested rezoning from the existing two-famity-;;;id"*i;il.. ;"*i.. .o
single-family residential. Resulting rezon'ing would reduce density from
l0 to 5 units. Application has been made in accordance with Section 2.l.500
of the Zoning Ordinance, 0rdinance No. 8, Series of 1973.
A Public Hearing was held on December 16, 1976 in accord with Section
21.400 of the Zoning Ordinance before the Town of Vail Planning Commission.
Recormendation of the Planning Commission will be forwarded to the Town
Council for final decision on January l8, 1977 at 7:30 PM in the Vail Mun'icipa'l
Building.
TOWN OF VAIL
Zoning Administrator
Published in the Vail Trail December 24,1976