HomeMy WebLinkAboutBIGHORN 5TH ADDITION BLOCK 7 LOT 1 LEGAL.pdfFILE COPY
MEMORANDUM
Town Council
Community Development Department
May 6, 2008
d-'"fe
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
trrb"l+
\\.$' "
I\ o(.
{.''D
d{ou'
*
n'o
.
",)r
/o
il.
A proposed addition to the Town's Official Avalanche Hazard Map at 4768
Meadow Drive/Lot 1, Block 7, Bighorn 5'n Addition and setting forth details in
regard thereto.
Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Bill Gibson
DESGRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The applicant, Larry Deckard, representing the property owner, is proposing an addition
to the Town's Official Avalanche Hazard Map in the vicinity of 4768 Meadow Drive/Lot 1,
Block 7, Bighorn sth Addition.
BAGKGROUND
The applicant, Larry Deckard, representing the property owner, has submitted a site
specific avalanche hazard study for the subject property. The submitted study clarifies
the delineation of the avalanche hazards on the subject site. A site plan (Attachment A),
an excerpt of the current Official Avalanche Hazard Map (Attachment B), the applicant's
request (Aftachment C), and the Avalanche Hazard Study prepared by William Klauber,
PE (Attachment D) have been attached for reference.
GRITERIA FOR REVIEW
Pursuant to Sub-section 12-21-13-H, Additions to Maps, Vail Town Code: "lf the
applicant estab/ishes at the hearing by clear and convincing evidence that the
information contained in the site specific geologic investigation is reliable, the town
council shall direct the Depaftment of Community Development to keep a copy of said
sife specfrb investigation on file in the Depaftment of Community Development and
available to the general public and shall further direct the department of community
development to notate the appropriate official map adopted by this chapter so that it
indicates that said site specific investigation is on file with the Department of Community
Development."
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends the Town Council approves the
proposed addition to the Official Avalanche Hazard Map in the vicinity of 4768 Meadow
Drive/Lot 1, Block 7, Bighorn 5'n Addition and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Should the Town Council choose to approve these text amendments, the Community
Development Department recommends the Town Council pass the following motion:
il.
tv.
;
,l i ., .,,3.f $,,r . ti f ;r
V.
"The Department of Community Development shall keep a copy of the Avalanche
Hazard Study for 4768 Meadow Drive/Lot 1, Btock 7, Bighom { edAition
prepared by William Kauber, PE dated September 15, 2007, on file in the
Department of Community Development and available to the general public; and
the Depaftment of Community Development shall notate the Official Avalanche
Hazard Map to indicate that said srfe specitl?c investigation is on file with the
Department of Community Development."
Should the Town Council choose to approve the proposed addition to the Official
Avafanche Hazard Map, the Community Development Department recommends the
Town Council makes the following finding:
"The applicanf has esfab/lshed by clear and convincing evidence that the
information contained in the site specific geologic investigation is reliable."
ATTAGHMENTS
Attachment A: Vicinity Map
Attachment B: Current Official Avalanche Hazard Map (excerpt)
Attachment C: Applicant's Request
Attachment D: Avalanche Hazard Study prepared by William Klauber, PE dated
September 15,2007
Attachment A
Attachment B
^=- $!,:;iHq
=EE Hfi F.='tr:#
ov-F(s LLorq=ffi 6c!oJ:-.E-,S,i+g
E EE#HF s lllu
Attachment C
Larry A. Deckard A.I.A.
P.O. Box 725
Avon. Co. 81620
P (970) 569-3 r02
F (e70) 569-3103
TO: Bill Gibson
75 South Frontage Rd.
Vail- CO 81657
tOtr9t07
P. (970) 479-2173
F. (970) 479-24s2
RE: Avalanche hazard studv for 4768 Meadow Drive. East Vail.
Dear Bill,
I am submitting to you a new geological avalanche hazard study provided by William Klauber, PE
for the determination of the classification of hazard levels at 4768 Meadow Drive in East Vail. He has
redefined the King Arthurs Court Avalanche Chute to reduce the high hazard red zone area-
The owners of 4768 Meadow Drive want to remodel their home for more garage space and a
pool. The pool may act as a dcflection wall at the avalanche side of the home and the garage
expansion will expand the footprint of the home to the West as illustated in the report. The design has not
been finalized so the report offers concep areas only. The actual design configuration will be detemrined
after the Town of Vail has accepted the new Geologic hazard study.
The owners of this home are excited to proceed with the remodel and look forward to your input
on the proposed design.
Thank You
E
lnl
ECEJI Vi'E
., ,, Z[{i7
TOWN OF VAIL
n
ia
Attachment D
September L5,2AA7
Larry Deckard, Architect
21 West FoalCircle
Edwards CO 81532
Re:Lot 1, Block 7, Bighorn 5'h Addition,4768 Meadow Drive, Vail, Colorado
Dear Mr Deckard:
At your request, we have performed an avalanche hazard study regarding the addition of a
garage structure to the west side of the existing house on subject property. Following are the
results of that study, which addresses only the garage addition.
SUMMARY
The addition falls within the blue zone of the King Arthurs Court avalanche chute, as redefined
by Mr Art Mears in January 2003. An avalanche diversion berm and/or structural fence shall be
required between the garage and the south and west sides of the lot, exposed garage walls
along the south and west sides shall be designed for a direct impact pressure of 4fi) psf or a
reduced oblique impact pressure pursuant to actual design, and the garage roof shall be
designed to resist uplift and to accommodate a snow load of 200 psf.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is located nearthe bottom ofthe King Arthu/s Court avalanche chute.
Earlier Vail avalanche maps, circa t973-t976, had placed almost the entire property within the
high hazard Red Zone. A detailed study by Hydro-Triad in L975-1979 defined the red zone to
encompass only the western portion of the property and the blue zone to include most of the
remainder. In 2003 the avalanche hazard zone was locally modified by Mr Arthur Mears, PE, to
shift the avalanche hazard zones slightly to the west and to significantly decrease the size of the
Red Zone. The effect of that modification for this property was to remove the property from
the Red Zone entirely, and to extend the Blue Zone only to the west edge of the existing
structure. This allows building to occur in the western portion of the lot with appropriate
design mitigation.
THE DESIGN AVALANCHE
The watershed in which the King Arthurs Court avalanche chute is located extends from the top
of the ridge at 11,100 foot elevation to Gore Creek at 8,520 foot elevation, a drop of 2580 feet
overamaximumtotaldistanceofapproximately5500feet. Evidenceofavalancheeffectson
Deckard/4768 Meadow Drive/Avalanche Hazard Page2
vegetation extends as high as 10,600 foot elevation on the west side of the basin, the lee side
from the prevailing westerly winds. Destruction of vegetation extends from that point
downward along a broad hillside into a narrow chute, thence downward along the stream to a
point just above the alluvial fan on which several houses are situated. Below 9200 foot
elevation the grade decreases substantially, around 8700 foot elevation the canyon makes a
radicaljog to the northwest for 250 to 3(X) feet, and at 8600 foot elevation the canyon opens
out onto the top of the alluvial fan, after which any avalanche would be laterally unconfined
and the fan topography would tend to spread it out laterally.
It is clear from vegetation analysis that most avalanches in this chute are rather narrow,
laterally confined, fairly shallow, follow the stream course, and do not reach the fan at all. At
the creek diversion to the northwest, there is a clear diversion of the avalanche paths in the
same northwest direction, with avalanches stopping before they reach the stream segment
which diverts back to the north. There is evidence of some overtopping of the northwest-
trending diversionary ridge at this point, but relatively minor in extent and with only incomplete
damage to trees. The straight-ahead path directly north to the alluvialfan is blocked by a
relatively dense forest of older trees, indicating that events large enough to fill the diverting
valley and proceed directly north overtopping the diverting ridge are infrequent in their
occurrence.
The King Arthur's Court avalanche chute was defined as a potential hazard area by the town of
Vail, requiring avalanche studies to determine acceptable building areas and structural design
parameters. Predicted impact pressures greater than 500 psf or predicted recurrence intervals
less than 25 years define a Red Zone, within which building is not allowed. Predicted impact
pressures less than 600 psf and a predicted recurrence interval greater than 25 years define a
Blue Zone, for which engineering review is required and structural mitigation may be required.
The first study of the chute was performed by Hydro-Triad, Ltd., in the 1975-1979 period. This
study hypothesized a major avalanche from top of ridge straight across the diversionary ridge at
8700 feet and onto the fan. lt identified the red zone as extending across much of the west half
of the subject property and the blue zone as encompassing most of the remainder of the
property including the house area. In a letter to the owner of the subject property in 1982,
Hydro-Triad recommended an oblique design impact pressure of 250 psf with an earth berm of
unspecified design.
In 2003 Mr Arthur Mears, PE, performed an avalanche engineering study for the owner of the
adjacent lot. Mr Mears used a regression analysis of extreme Colorado avalanches with known
runouts combined with localterrain features and observations of major local avalanches to
determine a slightly reduced runout limit for the KAC 100 year design-magnitude avalanche.
Using the new runout limit, he then used an avalanche dynamics model to redefine the Red and
Blue hazard zones. The redefined red zone now extends to approximately the same elevation
as the southwest corner of the subject property, but slightly to the west, and does not impact
the subject property at all. The redefined blue zone extends through the western portion of
Deckard/4768 Meadow Drive/Avalanche Hazard Page 3
the subject property, as far east as the west wall of the house. Those zones are delineated in
the attached Figure 2 from Mr Mears' report.
Reviewing Mr Mears' report, along with aerial photographs and topographic maps of the
avalanche chute, but without reproducing the entire study, the redefined zones appear to be
reasonable. The redefined 100 year design avalanche starts at a slightly lower elevation
concordant with vegetation damage evidence, it takes into consideration the changes in course
and slope and the confined nature of the chute, and it considers the effect of the natural
diversion berm nearthe bottom of the chute, resulting in a more detailed understanding and
analysis of the avalanche dynamics. lt is therefore used as the starting point for this report.
DESIGN PARAMETERS
Using the geometry calculated by Mears, including origin area, chute, red zone limit, blue zone
limit, and type of avalanche, a PCM model was used to estimate impact pressure at the garage
location for a dense dry flowing snow avalanche. At this location the avalanche is decelerating
and widening, and the angle of approach of the snow mass to the planned garage is estimated
to be approximately toward bearing 030 degrees, the distance past the red zone boundary to
the garage approximately 180 feet, the flowing core depth approximately 7to 2 feet, and the
velocity approximately 24feet per second. The perpendicular impact pressure at this point
would be approximately 40O psf.
As drawn on the site plan, exposed portions of the south garage wall should be designed for
minimum normal loading of 4fi) psf and uplift and shear loading of 200 psf, while exposed
portions of the west wall designed for normal loading of 200 psf and uplift and shear loading of
200 psf. Earth sheltering integrated with the new pool and redesigned backyard landscaping
may be an appropriate solution.
The garage roof shall be designed to resist uplift pressures of 200 psf from impacting snow
under the eaves, and its plan area shall be designed to support a downward snow load of at
least 200 psf, or more if required by code.
An earth berm, earth bank, and/or reinforced concrete diversion fence, singly or in
combination, shall be constructed from a point 50 feet or more east of the southwest property
corner to a point directly west ofthe northern extent of the garage structure to deflect the bulk
of the threatening portion of the avalanche mass to the west. Stopping the flow with a
perpendicular wall would require the tallest and strongest structure, with heights exceeding 10
feet and strengths exceeding 50O psf, so an oblique orientation is recommended.
As drawn at the oblique angle shown on the site plan, toward bearing 345', the structure would
need to extend at least 9 feet above avalanche path terrain at the south property boundary
decreasing to 7 feet at the north end. Greater heights are encouraged if landscaping permits.
Design normal toading on the fence should be for 250 psf or higher, and shear and uplift for 2fi)
Deckard/ 47 68 Meadow Drive/Avalanche Hazard Page 4
psf. Other orientations of the barrier may require different design loadings and heights. The
southwest side of any earth berm or bank shall be at a 1:1 slope or preferably steeper.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
It should be understood that the present state ofthe art in avalanche engineering is such that
what is called the 100 year design avalanche may actually have a recurrence interval anywhere
between 30 years and 300 years. lt should also be understood that a larger 500 year design
avalanche could occur at any time, including next year if climatic conditions were unfavorable
then. Though the 100 year design avalanche should be adequately handled by this design, the
design parameters specified above may not be adequately protective against larger avalanche
events. lt is therefore always prudent to build the maximum practical degree of protection into
the structure wherever possible, allowing personal and structural survival through a larger than
expected event, rather than building to minimum standards.
The design elements of berm and strengthened garage walls are to some degree redundant,
but not entirely. A garage excavated into the slope with concrete walls can easily be
strengthened, and an earth bank or berm seems appropriate for this site. Therefore whatever
redundancy exists is not considered wasted. lf a particular design requires some modification
to these elements, then a review and some adaptation to the avalanche hazard mitigation
design may be acceptable.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide this service for you. Please call if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
Bill Klauber LLC
lr,
William Klau
Box 909
Leadville CO
719-486-0202
Ki:':!')rs,>oaqs--l.\c,
-*''oNq\-vl
Deckard/4758 Meadow Drive/Avalanche Hazard Page 5
Eagle County Assessor Aerial Photo with Avalanche Path at Lower Left
Decka rd/4768 Meadow Drive/Avalanche Hazard Page 5
FfGURE 2. Avalarrfrc zorlc mq of he tenainwifrrin ttrc runofi zone
of the'KAC'avalandn oedh. small mdiMionsto fnese hazard
zortes ftom pravbus sfudles resfi fron applkfrnn ot anert procedres aN meflwls. IDe rasrtence at 4nE Meadat Niw is
lrcated immedidely to ttre ea{ of ilrc hazard zone.
SCATE: 7'= 7,0@'
ffi
N
|l),u
King Arthurs court Avalanche Runout Zone as Redefined by Arthur Mears
Deckard/4768 Meadow Drive/Avalanche Hazard PageT
I t
\.
Y
I
ffifi N
-
0 ffi 0mtffitrff,
SCPL7 l" = IOOO'
Vll Klauber LLC
Leadville, Cdorado
Krnq Nthurg Curt, Avalanche Ch,he
.- Deckard/4768MeadowDrive/Avalanche Hazard
9rJ7
l0l'17
? orqtl,le
r1
,/ crft)
5tk
I t \l
?72
7C\17
.,''| 'l': i 11l' l
'" i;: )'
:
BO
7ILL KLNrTK LC
Leilvrlle. Cdorilo
0 eckNd 6x qe ? eaq ? roiecL
4768 Meilow?rive
cdlfi"ilw trl,EuF$*{I
Design Reuiew Soard
ACTIOT{ FORM
Depaitment of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax;970.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.com
Project Name: MCARMGA REROOF
Project Description:
Pafticipants:
OWNER
Project Address:
4768 MEADOW DR
Legal Descraption:
Parcel Number:
Comments:
DRB Number: DR8060550
RNAL APPROVAL FOR A RE-ROOF SAME FOR SAME WOOD SHAKES
EAST VAIL REALTY HOLDING LLCL2IA5I2OO6
PRIVADA DE HORACIO NO 10
MH(ICO DF MEnCO 11510
Location:
Lot: 1 Block: 7 Subdivision: BIGHORN sTH ADDmON
2101-131-0400-1
APPLICANT TNT SPECIALTY CONSTRUCIORS, L2l05l2OO6 Phone: (719) 487-3014
PO BOX 2370
MONUMENT
coLoMDo 80132
License: 813-8
CONTMCTOR TNT SPECtALfi CONSTRUCTORS, 12/05/2006 Phone: (719) 487-3014
PO BOX 2370
MONUMENT
coLoMDo 80132
License: 813-B
4768 MEADOW DR VAIL
. Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
Conditions:
BOARD/STAFF ACTIOT{
Action: STAFFAPR
Date of Approvalt L210512006
Cond: 8
(P|-AN): No changes to these plans may be made wlthout the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
@nd:0
(P|-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
of final approval, unless a buildjng permit is issued and construction is mmmenced
and is diligently purcued tovrrard complefion.
Cond; ll3
All daclopment applications submitted to the Town after the effective date of
Ordinane 26, Series 2006 shall be subJect to the pending employee houshg
regulations in whatever form they are finally adopted; provided, however, that lf
the Town fails to adopt the pending empbyee houshg regulauons W Aprll L5,2007,
this Ordinance shall not apply to sudr dernlopment appllcadons.
Plannen Joe Suther DRB Fee Pald:
Minor Exterior Alterations
*ffi Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2128 tax:. 970.479.7452
web: www.\Eilgov.com
General Information:
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please
refer to *re submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An applietion for Design Review
cannot be accepted untii all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The
project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission'
besign review approval lapses untess a building permit is issued and construction commences within
one year of the approval.
Application for Design Review
Description of the
r-'
Location of the Proposal: Lot: I Block: I Subdivision:
+1bb Mr-hsou 9P-Physical Address:
Parcet No.: 2 l e):3to-1 c€t)(Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no')
Zoning:
Name(s) of Owner(s):
Mailins Address: /1 C I lu '= Av "' (J O-
Phone:
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Nameof Applican* -fi.ff 5ff C\FLT/ c-d$)TP{'-iToFS/ TtS*
Mailing Address:x ?3'.70 NiONUt"l8tt{
phone: r7l )tl' 3o d- 3i)
Y'w o r a
.r.u?
2
Type of Review and Fee:
D Signs
E Conceptual Review
D New Construction
tr Addition
D Minor Alteration
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.
No Fee
$650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.
$300 For an addition where square foobge is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
,r', ffiI For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,\W re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
6, ' retaining walls, etc.(ffi- For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the
Design Review Board.
No Fee Separation Request
JOINT PROPERTY OWNER
WRITTEN APPROVAL LETTER
I, (print name)a joint owner of property located at (address/legal
f., -.v*t,
description) 4ti
provide this letter as written approval of the plans dated which have
been submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Depaftment for the proposed improvements
be completed at the address noted above. I understand that the proposed improvements include:sA
*
vtr-
-l I ,l AS ExtsfiQ' (<-f,,oa,,( Srihoq .
I further understand that minor modifications may be made to the plans over the course of the review
process to ensure compliance with the Town's applicable codes and regulations.
1lnlo(
(DateJ
F: \cdev\FORMS\PERMITS\Planning\drb-minor-alt_1 1-23- 2005.doc
ttl23l7o0s
F-Nv; yH L, <€
Page 2 of 13
Buildino Materials
PROPOSED MATERIALS
Tvoe of Material Color
pl(At"tr 41 c^r"on,a Jouo'- 5
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Window
Doors
Door T
Hand or
Flues
Flashing
ch
Trash
Green
Retaining Walls
Exterior Lighting
Please specifo the manufacturer's name, the color name and number and attach a color chip.
F:\cdev\FORMS\PERMITS\Plannin g\drb_minor_alt_1 1-23 -2005.doc
1!23t2005
Page 5 of 13
. Location of all required parking spaces . Snow storage areas,. Proposed dumpster locaUon and detail of dumpster enclosure.r Retaining walls with proposed elevations at top and bottom of walls. A delailed cross-section and
elevation drawings shall be provided on the plan or separate sheet. Stamped engineering
drawings are required for walls between 4'and 6'feet in height,. Delineate areas to be phased and appiopriate timing, if applicablg
. Landscape Plan:. Scale of 1" = 20' or larger . Landscape plan must be drawn at the same scale as the site plan.. Location of existing trees, 4" diameter or larger. Indicate trees to remain, to be relocated
(including new location), and to be removed. Large stands of trees may be shown (as bubble) if
the strand is not being affected by the proposed irnprovements and grading.. Indicate all existing ground mver and shrubs.. Detailed legend, listing the type and size (caliper for deciduous trees, height for conifers, gallon
size for shrubs and height for foundation shrubs) of all the existing and proposed plant material
including ground cover.. Delineate critical root zones for existing trees in close proximity to site grading and @nstruction.. Indicate the location of all proposed plantings.. The location and type of existing and proposed watering systems to be employed in caring for
plant material following its installation.. Eiisting and proposed contour lines. Retaining walls shall be included with the top of wall and
the bottom of wall elevations noted.
. LighUng Plan:. Indicate type, location and number of fixtures.. Include height above grade, lumens output, luminous area . Attach a cut sheet for each proposed fixture.
e REPAINT PROPOSALS
. For all proposals to repaint existing buildings, the following supplemental information is required:
. @lor chip or color sample including the manufacturer name and color number(s). Architectural elevation drawings which clearly indicate the location of proposed colors (ie, siding,
stucco, window trim, doors, fascia, soffiits, Etc.)
F:\cdev\FoRMs\PERMiTS\Planning\drb-minor_alt-11-23-Z005.doc Page 5 of 13
1112312005
Bqh-n -6-'=t?'
'7o+ /, ltloot-7
,,-ffi
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel : 970.479.2139 fax: 97 0.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: EASTVAIL REALTY DECK DRB Number: DR8040512
Project Description:
Place trex decking over existing patio; projects into setback, but not more than-3 feet; new
railings on rear will match those on the front of the home; project had begun before receiving
approval and was red-tagged by CE.
Participants:
OWNER EASTVAIL REALTY HOLDING LLCO9/2712004 PhONC:
PRIVADA DE HOMCIO NO 10
MECCO DF MEfiCO 11510
License:
APPUCANT TI M BERFALLS MANAGEMENT CO. 109 | 27 | 2004 Phone : 97 0 - 47 5-2522
4496 E. MEADOW DR.
VAIL
co 81657
License:
Project Address: 4768 MEADOW DR VAIL Location:
4758 MEADOW DRIVE
Legal Description: Lot: 1 Block: 7 Subdivision: BIGHORN 5TH ADDffiON
Parcel Number: 210113104001
Commentsr see conditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Action: STAFFAPR
Second By:Vote: Date ofApproval: 09/30/2004
Conditions:
Cond: B
(PIAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced
,l
and is diligently pursued toward completion.
Cond: CON0006719
The applicant shall leave no exposed ends of the Tro< decking material on any part
of the deck
Entry: 09/30/2004 By: ee Actionr AP
Cond: CON0006720
The applicant shall apply railings to the deck to match existing railings on
exterior of front of home
Entry: 09/30/2004 By: ee Action: AP
Cond: CON0006721
The applicant shall not encroach any further into the side setback than the
encroachment that existed at the time of application submittal.
Entry: 09/30/2004 By: ee Action: AP \
Planner: Elisabeth Eckel DRB Fee Paid: $2O.OO
T0i4,m
]lnor Exterior Alteratlol
Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
teli 9.7 0.479.2139 f ax: 97O.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.com
General Information:
All pro;ecLs requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please
refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The
project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within
one year of the approval,
Description orthe Reque tt TCaci: 1UZ.i. &lr- &Df Pc h)o
Locationofthe Proposal: Lot: /elocr: t Subdrvision:Btata<, ftril toa4t;u
€ Un' (X-rn fuqt*-UC
--.-MairinsAddress: ^tqb E 4opa. Oe A/ttz
-UrYLGJlfl-
physicar Add ress, - - fi 6-/W-e.l- .^fuLtll--
Parcel I
Zo ni ng:
o,(Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8540 for parcel no.)
Name of Applicant:
Maili4g Address:7o'f/rtor**, /'/".t.llqt
Owner(s) Signatu
2- srrl-$nv: On-
Tlrpe of Review and Fee:
C Signs
E Conceptual Review
C New Construction
ll Addition
I Minor Alteration
(multFfamily/commercial)
6 t tinor Alteration
(single-family/duplex)
E Changes to Approved Plans
n Separation Reques!
qn'qrt Jrzt-
already approved by Planning Staff or
?r
the , ll ,ir ' ,l
i. !' Ll-"'c'r
.- tt t,r''' t'
1 t'
t' ,
Vfttt, 0, I lct>Phone:
Fax:E-mail Address:
.$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.
No Fee
$650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.
$300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
comrnercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
$250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvemenb, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
rei-aining walls, etc.
$20 F i x'';rtor changes to buildings and site improvemenLs, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For revisions to plans
Design Review Bcard.
No Fee
I
i:
',\,,
I
Page 1 of L2lO4/28/04
o
****r.*tt r.t *r.r.t *t r'r.*r.*****,r*********.r**'rr.{.t ****'*****'t'*'t***1.*'(.************l.'r**'**********r}*****
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement
,* * * * *** * * * * +** * * * **:t* ***** * *!*** * * * *** * ** *'* * *** *** * * **:t * * * 'i*** * *** * * * *:1.** *{.* ** *:i* ** ***** *****
Statement Number: R040005754 Amount: $20.00 09/27/2OO4LI:35 Alt
Pa)rment Method: check Init: iIS
Notation: *7242/E;AST
VAII, REJATJTY HOI.'DING CO
Permit No: DR8040512 Type: DRB-Minor AIts, SFR/DUP
Parcel No: 210113104001
Site Address: 4758 MEADOW DR VAII,
IJocation: 4768 MEADOW DRM
Total Fees: 520.00
This Payment: $20.00 Total ArJr Pmts: 920.00
Balance: S0.00
********:i*+**********t *+ * * * * * * * * * ** * * * {.*'** *** *!F:} * * {.t ** * * **** * !r* * * * * *** * * {.** * *'1.** * * * * * * ** *** *
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Curnenl Prnts
DR OO1OOOO31122OO DES]GN REVIEI^I FEES 20.00
- tr.t-,:89"53'21-Y
.01 vl
N
\
$
,-3ew.
// t- r xtr
$)
B
R iv
lo
IB lr
W,t N W,Lir llr**-
o o
JCUnf l4ot4 S4r,z c;,q,-1-S
T{ =r 'rqfl *
€nsr futn ?lL.'-o O
o o
4768 Meadow Drive
Historv of Activitv
June 28, 2004
o At JR's request, I checked on possible illegal construction at this site.
They are building a larger deck in the rear of the house. After checking
Permits Plus it was determined that there are no active approvals or
permits for this site.
June 29, 2004
o Went back to the site. No one on site. Took pictures and hung a Red Tag
on the deck.
July 12,2004
o Went to the site. Additional work has been occurring. Red Tag was lying
on the ground so I attached it to the front of the deck again. Workers at an
adjacent site did not know the workers but said that one of the workers
was named Bob.
July 15,2004 o Went to the site. No one working. Red Tag has been removed. I pulled
up owner information on the County website. Owner is corporation from
.Mexico. Per the State website, Jay Peterson is the Registered Agent. I
called Jay and left a message. Jay later called me to state that he is not
aware of work going on there or who is doing it.
August 09,2004
o Went to the site. Red Tag has been removed. I spoke with a worker from
Bumett, who had just moved a wire for the new hot tub, and he stated that
Bob Ruder had hired him. I was also approached by workers from an
adjacent construction site and they stated that they had told the workers
doing the deck work that they could not remove the Red Tag and needed
to contact the Town of Vail to discuss the deck. I went back to the site
later in the day to take pictures to show that additional work has been done
since the job was stopped. I called Bob Ruder, spoke with the secretary
and asked her to have Bob call me ASAP and gave her an overview of
what my issues were.
August 10,2004
o I called Bob Ruder (he left a message for me last night) and spoke with
him about the deck. He stated that he had hired a contractor to do the
work. Mr. Ruder was aware that a Red Tag had been removed and had
advised the contractor to go to the Town of Vail Community Development
Department to straighten it out. The contractor did not do so. I asked Mr.
Ruder to supply me with the name of that contractor so that I can contact /
question him.
August 12,2004
o Mr. Ruder had a pre-application meeting with Warren Campbell
(Planning) and outlined what Planning needed as submittal requirements
for the deck. Mr. Ruder also asked about some otJrer proposed changes
the owner would like to make.
August 26,2004
o Charlie Davis asked about the deck work and what Mr. Ruder has done to
comply. Charlie also stated that the Red Tag has been removed again.
After informing Charlie of what had occurred since the fust Red Tag and . contacts with Mr. Ruder, Charlie requested that I issue a summons to Mr.
Ruder (since he is/has been acting as the owner's representative) for the
violations that have occurred. I went to Police Dispatch to get the
personal information for Mr. Ruder and filled out the summons. I had the
Vail Police Deparknent serve the summons for us.
r August26,2004
o Mr. Ruder came in to Community Development to discuss the
summons. Vail P.D. served it to him yesterday. He is stating that he
should not be served because he is tying to conect what is wrong and
cannot change the past. I explained that we were glad that he is now
working with us to resolve all of the issues but he was summonsed
because of what he had caused, as agent for the owner, in the past. He
then provided me with the name (he said that it was all he had) and a
phone number. I called the number that he gave me. Not a valid
number (no longer in service).
-David Rhoades, Code Enforcement Officer
Town of Vail, Dept. of Community Development
t"s.\0 ) aoa4
q)R, )se
Ll'l bB lf\e&oo.,: De-r're.
5,^nr. 49.,2oo9
/\o ^rG. ^r $JF r d-')d\
tl ?trg /I)enoo,o De-r ue
5u*ru. A9,2oo'/
0R, 752
\^7i'b ltrleama0erue
o I
'4"'\. A\-r\ h,-A , t+#_J
ToriN?r vAr/my
fit*n Reviewactit Form
TOWN OF VAIL
Project Name: Klawiter Residence Project Number: PRJ00-0237
Project Description: Deck addition
Owner, Address and Phone: Wolfram Klawiter, 4768 Meadow Drive, 476-9596
Architect/Contact, Address and Phone:
Project Street Address: 4768 Meadow Drive
Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 7, Bighorn Subdivision 5'h Addition
Parcel Number: 210113104001 Buildine Narne:
Comments:
Project#:
,I,IIIPLEASE CONSULT THE T.O.V. BUILDING DEPARTNIENT REGARDING
POTENTIAL ASBESTOS ABATEMENT ISSUES _ 479-2325****
Board / Staff Action
Motion by: Action: StaffDENIED
Seconded by:
Vote:
Conditions: Title 12, Zoning Regulotions: Chapter 21, Hazard. Reguldions; Section 10, Development
Restricted, Subsection A, of the Town Code of the Town of Vail states: " No structure shall be built in
any flood hazard zone or red avalanche hazard area."
Town Planner: Bill Gibson
Date: 8/18/00
F: EVERYO\lE.DRB\APPROVAL 9nI DRBAPPR.FRM
DRB Fee Pre-Paid: $20.00
hprt Or
E c'r/F,I
Department of Communiry Development
75 South F'rontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2I38
FAX 970-479-2452
Lot Size:
Zonng:
Standard
21735 sq.ft.
Two-Familv Primarv Secondan' Residcntial
Allowance (total)Existing Remaining
May2-2000
Karin Scheideggcr
2436 Chamonix Lane
Vail CO 81657
Re: Development Potential for Lot 1. Block 7, Bighorn Subdivision sth Addition / 4768
Meadow Drive
Dear Karin:
I am rcsponding to !'our request for information about the Klarviter properr,"'* located at 47 68
Meadow Drive in East Vail. According to the infbrmation in our files. the follorving critcria will
appl,v to any proposed fufure dcveiopment of this proper[ .
GRFA: 5274 sq.ft. (includes 2x425 bonus) 4160 sq.ft.*
Priman, Unit 3079 sq.ft. (6096 or greater) 3006 sq.ft.*
Secondary Unit 2196 sq.ft (40% or less) I154 sq.ft.*
1114 sq.ft.x
73 sq.ft.*
1042 sq.ft.*
Site Coverage:
Setbacks:
Landscaping:
4347 sq.ft. (20% if slope < 30Yo)
20 ft. (front) i 15 ft. (sides and rear)
13041 sq.ft. (60% minimum)
*subject to verification with stamped architectural plans
Two other mechanisms for increasing GRFA on the propert_v include:
i. Constructing a Type II Employee Housing Urut (EHL.,) rvhere it is possible to receive a
-500 sq. ft GRFA bonusr or
ii. Adding up to 250 sq. ft. per existing dwelling unit under the 250 Ordinance (once all of
the remaining GRFA on the property has been utilized).
{g *""r"ruo ror",
.f
The property is classified as a geologically sensitive area because it is located within a moderate
hazard debris flow area and also lvithrn both the red and blue avalanche hazard areas. Prior to
approval of any development plan where additional living space is proposed- the Communitv
Development Depanment rvould require that a qualified geologist or engineer conduct a site-
specific geological investigation. Development approval w-ould be contingent upon the
recommendation of the geologist or engineer and could potentially require mitigation measures.
According to the Town of Vail Code- no construction is permitted in tfie red avalanche hazard
area. This area occupies a large portion ofthe propeqv. Structures (including the cristing
duplex) may be constructe d in the blue hazard avalanche area providing that proper rnrtigating
measurss havc been taken.
You also requested information regarding the orvnership ofthe lots adjacent to the subject
properf,v. To the west, Mr. Klarviter's lot abuts proper6, owned by the US Forest Service. Tract
C and D, Bighom Torvnhouses to the northrvest are propeny'of the Torvn of Vail. The propeqv
to the south is privatel.v owned. A1l properties adjacent to Mr. Klar.r.iter's lot located within Toun
of Vail boundaries are classified as geologically sensitive areas and are. hence, subject to similar
development limitations.
I hope this information has been of assistance to 1'ou. [f vou have anv further questions or rcquire
clarification of the issues that have been raised. olease contact me at 479-2128 or
akj erulf@ci. vail. co-us.
Sincerely,
,'/.t ,)' : -
UJtt$pLgY
Ann Kjerulf / | /
Planner I \ |
Town of Vail W'
ZONE CHECK
4,1 - ^ I Dttc: l"l\'l L lLetD
Lcgal dcscription: Lot I Block ? Fi[ns Addrcss LllttV, ,!\E rnriru h,: .
Phonc
Phonc
Proposcd usc
Buildable arca
Existing
/ilbo +
. Proooscd Total Rcmaining
ut4
+3
lol L_
(30x33)
Front
Sidcs
Rcar
Y;.L ( fi eU "t
iu,^'n"rtr"ft_L:J_4a.t)
20'
,ls'
l5'
Minimum
3',/6'.
Requircd Encloscd
(300) (500) (900) (1200)
Conrplix Mrh TOV Liglting Ord.inancc
Arc finishcd gradcs Icss rhan 2:l (50%)
Environm cnial4Iazards
Prcvious conditions ofapproval (chcck propcrty filc);
Att \
Architcct
Zonc distcict
Lot sizc
rorarGRFA 414 * #b7 -___@l_
PrinraryGRFA AbFt +ezl162{1=_}pa4_ Mb *
Sccondary GRre i ??o r (121 (ry(+) =L19_L t if4 *
* 6'15 = 425 crcdit plus 250 addition
Docs this rcqucst involvc a 250 Addition?
llorv much of tlc allorvcd 2i0 Addition is uscrl with this reoucsr?
Sitc Co\.cragc
Hcight
Sctbacks
Landscaping
Rctaining Wall I{cights
Parking
Caragc Crcdit
Drivcrvay Pcrmittcdslopc % proposcd Slopc 4 zr
Ycs__- No
Ycs No
I ) Pcrccnt Slopc (< >30%)
2) Floodplain
3) Wctlands
4) Watcr Course Sctback (30) (50)
5) Geqloeic Hazards /.-
b) Rockfall
c) Dcbris FIorv abdtu+r€ llfr- '
ls thc propcrty non-conforming? Dcscribc:
.4) O P"O ql,ftN7vt)N F)iL
DESIGN FJ,VIE}Y CMCKLIST
Projcct:
Q sti-RvEy
Scalc
Bcnchmark
Lcgal dcscription
LOr ilzc
Buildablc tuea
Eascmcnts
Topography
100 yr. flood plain
Watcr Coursc Sctback
Environmcn hl Hazrrds
Trees
Utility locations
Spot clcvations
-.-..__
I
Scals
Building Height
Encroachmcnts
Setbacks
Site Covcrage
EavcVovcrhangs (4)
DecksiBalconics
Carage conncction
Site Gradc\Slopc
Rcbining Walls
Fcnccs
Tuming Radius
Drivervay (acccss and grade)
Snorv Storagc
Firc Acccss
Q FLooRPLANS
Scalc
CRFA
250 additionat GRFA
CrarvlWttic Spacc
FIII T
Q BULDING ELEVATIoNS
ScaJ e
-:- ColorWaterials
Roof pitch
Q LANDSCAPEPLAN
Existing fccs
--- .Proposed bces
Lcgend
MISCELI-A.NEOUS
Condo Approval
Titlc rcport (.A. & B)
Utility.vcrifi cation form
Plotos ofsitc
Building material samplcs
C.O. Vcrification
SunLShade Anglcs
Utilities (undcrground)
Vierv Corridors.
Varianccs
PIat rcstdctions
Q SITE PLAN
FILE COPY
75 South Frontage Rotd
Vail, Colorado 81657
t0t-47 9-21 1 I / 47 9-21 1 9
D c p aftment of C ommunity D ea c I opm e nt
July 29, 1992
Mr. Wolfram Klawiter
4768 Meadow Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Re: PEG Meetlng June 22, 1992 - A request for a condltlonal use permlt tor a
bed and breakfast located In the prlmary/secondary zone dlstrlct at 4768
Meadow Drlve, Lot 1, Block 7, Blghorn Subdlvlslon sth Addltlon.
Dear Mr. Kalwiter:
Encfosed is a copy of he minutes of the June 22,1992 Planning and Environmental
Commission (PEC) meeting at which your conditional use permit request was approved. The
attached copy of the minutes will serve as your record ol lhe conditions of approval.
Please note thal the approval of this conditional use permit shall lapse and become void if a
building permit is not obfained and construction not commenced and diligently pursued toward
completion, or if the use for which the permit is granted has not commenced within two years
from approval (June 2'1992). lf approval of this conditional use permit lap6es, an
application must be resubmitted for reconsideration by the Community Development
Depafiment statf and the PEC,
lf you have any questions or comments regarding this intormation, please do not hesitate to
contact me al 303/479-2138.
Enclosure
Jilt reviewed tra request with the Commisslon, staung that this was merely a requsst
lor a2-year extenslon to he variance prwiously approved by he Plannlng and
Environmental Commlsslon. After some discussion, Dalton Wliams made a motion to
approve the variance request extension and Chuck Crist seconded the motion. A vote
was tiaken and the molion passed unanimously, 6-0.
3. A request lo sxtend for 2 yearc the June 10, 1991 site coverage varlance apqovd lor
the Stanley residencs located at 1816 Sunburst Drive, Lot 1, Vail Valley 3d Filing, a
Resubdlvision of part of Sunburst
Applicant Jack Stanley Planner: JlllKammerer
Jill reviewed this request for the Commission, stating the roquest was lor a two-year
extenslon b a site ooverag€ variance as previously approved by the Planing and
Environmental Commission. As thers were no changes to the request, Chuck Crist
made a motion to approve the request and Jeff Bowen seconded the motion. A vote
was taken and the motion passed unanlmously, 6-0.
As the applicant was not yet prssont for item # 4 on the agenda it was agreed to movs
to ltem #6 on he agenda.
4. A request for selback variances for the Grubbs Residence, 1031 Eagle's Nest
Circle/Lot 1, Block l, VailVillage 8lh Filing.
Applicant: G&S Parhership Planner: Jill Kammerer
Jill reviewed his request for the Commission, explaining that the setbach variance was
being requested in order to allow the oonsbuclion of a sloping roof within he rear, east
and west setback This was the only change being proposed by the applicant. The
staff stated fiat a hadship dld exist in this case due to the small lot size. Secondfy,
when the residence was originally consfucted, it was bullt in the setbacks. After
some discussion a motion was made by Dalton Williams to approve this rsqusst and
Greg Amsden seconded the motion. A vots was taken and the molion passed
unanimously, 6-0.
5. A request for a conditional use permit for a bed and breakfast located in the
primary/secondary zone disfict at 4768 Meadow Drive, Lot 1, Block 7, Bighom
SuMivision Sth Addition.
Applicant: Wolfram Klawibr Planner: Shelly Mello
The Commisslon felt the owner should be required to place a sign on the property
Indicating which front door was to be used for the bed and breakfast and that there
should also be mention of the avalanche hazard on the sign. A concem was raisad as
PLrmho .nd E|whonmfitrl Conmbbn M-hC. .ln 22, t$ll
o
to hs applicant belng able to use additional space for the bed and breakfast other han
that whlch had been approved. ltistan Pritr stated that the whole bed and breaklast
issue was on an honor system and hoped that the applicant would abide by these
rules. Shelly stated that all adiacent property ol^rners had been notified of this request
and there was no opposition. Ghuck Cdst then made a molion to approve the request
and Gena Whiten seconded the molion. A vote was taken and the motion passed
unanimously, 6-0.
6. The next ltem to be discussed was #7 on the agenda, a request to amend Chapter
18.71 - Additional Gross Residenfial Floor Area, of he tvlunicipal Code relating to
Employee Housing Unib.
Applicanl Town ol Vail Planner: JillKammerer
Jill Kammerer, Senior Planner, rsviewed the request with ths Commission. Greg
Amsden asked if passing fiis request would allow an applicant to add a third unit to
their property. Jill stated under the previously endorsed affordable housing ordinance
code amendments this was possible, depending on the size of the lot
Primary/secondary and two family lots under 15,000 sq. ft. would still only be allowed a
maximum of 2 units while similarly zoned lots greater than 15,000 sq. ft. in size would
be allowed to construc't an EHU (a third unil). However, the code amendment under
consideration today related only to he 250' chapter ol the code. The stafl felt that
thls code amendment would be effective in providing employee housing. Greg also
stated he was concemed with the impacts an increase in traflic and parking would
have on the neighborhoods if density is allowed to increase throughout ths
neighborhood.
There was discussion relating to the enforcsment of his request, including the
possibility of short brming these units. The staff stated that only Type 1 employee
housing units could be sold. After fufiher discusslon, Chuck Grist made a motion to
recommend to Town Council to amend Chapter 18.71 of the Town of Vail Municipal
Code per the saff's memo relaling to the 250 ordinance and Dalton Williams seconded
the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-1, Greg Amsden voting
opposed. Kristan Pritr asked Greg to state his reason for opposing and he stated that
he was concerned wih the impacts increased density could have on the neighborhood.
Greg Amsden felt that the Town would not be able to keep up witr the problem.
Diana Donovan then stated that the PEC needed to go into Exedtive Session with
Town Attomey Larry Eslnrith to discussion legal issues. Dalton Wlliams made a
motion to adjoum the meeting and Greg Amsden seconded the motion. A vote was
taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0.
The Planning and Environmental Commission meeting was recalled to order by
Chairperson Diana Donovan after the Executive Session.
Plhhe .rd En lronngrhl Commbbn M..!rg , ,ttt 2, 19Cil
+ Or" ltu) ,^T tr* fu^
PUBLIC NOTICE
NoTtCE lS HEFEBY GtvEN that fie Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on June 22,1992, at 2:00 p.m. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1. A request to extend for 2 years the September 9, 1991 front setback variance approval
for the Krediet residence located at 224 Forest Road, Lot 11-A, Block 7, Vail Village
First Filing.
Applicant: John Krediet Planner: Jill Kammerer
2. A request to extend lor 2years the June 10, 1991 site coverage variance approval for
the Stanley residence located at 1816 Sunburst Drive, Lot 1, Vail Valley 3rd Filing, a
Flesubdivision ol put ol Sunburst.
Applicant: Jack Stanley
Planner: Jill Kammerer
3. A request lor a minor subdivision for Lot 5, Block?, Bighorn Firsl, 3916 Lupine Drive.
Applicant: Marty Abel, President of Sable Lupine Partners, Ltd.Planner: Mike Mollica
4. A request for a minor subdivision for Lot 4, Eidge at Yail, 1452 Bidge Lane.
Applicant: Frank McKibben
Planner: Jill Kammerer
5. A request for a conditional use permit for a bed and breakfast focated in lhe
primary/secondary zone district at 4768 Meadow Drive, Lot 1, Block 7, Bighorn
SuMivision Sth Addition.
Applicant: Wolfram Klawriler
Planner: Shelfy Mello
6. A request for setback variances for the Grubbs Residence, 1031 Eagle's Nest
Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Village 8th Filing.
Applicant: G&S Partnership
Planner: Jill Kammerer
7. A request to amend Ghapter 18.71 - Additional Gross Residential Floor Area, of the
Municipal Code relating to Employee Housing Units.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Jill Kammerer
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public review in the
Community Development Department office.
Town ol Vail
Community Development Department
Published in he VailTrail on June 5, 1992
Rr ^v f\v
\,NW
\n\\r'
!.'I t,il revined 9/4/91 o ?4'w>
Date of Applicatio.,R$'l-!{'+ - i:iggz
Date of PEC Meeting 6.2?,72-
APPLICATION TOR CONDITIONAI., USE PERMIT
This procedure is required for any project required to obtain a conditional- use permit.
The application wil-1 not be accepted until all information is
submiLted.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT /(/z -','1, -
AUUKI!JJ >6 t2
Ytl :/" n'//t )PHONE
B NAME OF APPLICANT' S REPRESENTATIVE
ADDRESS
PHONE
c.NAME OF
oerNER (s)
ADDRESS
OWNER (S) (print
STGNATURE (S)/u1
6 )' /4'"
or type)/t/i,/f -.,^ K/^ _, ; t'<_
PHONE 6-o
'rfq
tt,ttQi'
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEGAL:LOT / BLOCK 7 TTi,TNC ADDRESS 4 v 6t' r4e^,/".- A- V.:/ t"Tpttst
u
:
E FEE $2OO. OO PAID cK#BY
THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT WTLL ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL.
F. A list of the names of owners of aII property adjacent. to the subject properLy INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS
STREETS, and their mailing addresses. THE APPLICANT WILL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT OWNERS AND CORRECT ADDRESSES.
II. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE:
A pre-application conference with a planninS sLe_tE_msmbel_is strongly suggested to determine if any additional in:Fo-mation is needed. No application will be accepted unl-ess it complete (must include all items required by the zoning administrator) . It is the appJ.icant's responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to find out about addi-tional submittal requirements.
III. PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION WTLL STREAMLINE THE
APPROVAL PROCESS TOR YOUR PROJECT BY DECREASING THE NUMBER OF
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TTIAT THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
COMMISSION (PEC) MAY STIPULATE. ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST
BE COMPLIED WTTH BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT IS ]SSUED.
Four .tr41 copies of the following information must be
submitted:
1. A description of the precise nature of the proposed use
and its operating characteristics and measures proposed to make the use compatibLe with other properties in the vicinity.
The description must afso address:
a. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town.
b.?r.". of t.he use on rigr't td air, distribution facilities ' '
recreation
facilities and PubIic
rl
?
q
of poPulation, transPortation
utilities, schoofs' Par'<s ano
facifities, and other Public facilities needs '
c. Effect upon traffic, with -particular reference to
congestion' iuio^oti"e and pedestrian safety and
conienience, traffic flow and control' access'
tin.rrr.t"uiiiiy, and removal of snow from the
streets and Parking area'
d. Effect upon the character of the area in which the
proposed ,r""-i" to be located' including t'he scale
'rrt,O Uuff of the proposed use in relation to
surrounding uses.
A site plan at a scale of at least 1" = 20' shol'ing
proposed devetopmeni of the site' including topography'
buildins ro.uttonll-piiring, traffic circulation'
useable open space, Iandscaped areas and utilities and
drainage features.
Preliminary building elevations and floor plans'
A title report to verify ownership and easenents'
If the building is condominiumized' a letter from the
condominiu. u""o"iation in support of the proposal must
be submitted to staff
Any additional material necessary for the review of the
apitfication as aeieiti"ed by the zoning administrator'
** For interior rnodifications, an improvement survey
and site plan may be waived by the zoning
administrator I
IV. TIME REQUIREMENTS
The Planning and Environmenlal Commission meets on the 2nd
and 4th Moldays oi "i"n month. A complete.apPlication form
and aII "".o*punying-rit"iiuf
(as destribed above) must be
submitted a minimum of four (4) weeks prior.to the date of
the PEC public neiii"g. No incomplete.tpPll"S!i91" (as
dererrnined by thJ ""iii"S .O^ini"tiator) wirf Ue accepted by
the plannlng stair-u.ioit or after the designated subnittal
date.
A11 PEC aPproved conditional use permits shall lapse if
construction is ";;";;;;""ta "ititin one year of the date of
;;;;;;;i-""o oirig;"iIt pursued to completion' or ir the use
for which tne apiio"ir'ii granred is nbt commenced within
one year.
If this application requires a seParate-revieY P-l ""V local'
SLate or Federal-;;e;;i oLher than the Town of Vail' the
application fee "nirr Le increased by 5200'00' Examples of
such review, may-include, but are nol limited to: Colorado
;;;;rt;.;i br High*iv a"t""s Permits' Arnv corps of
Engineers 404, exc.
The applicant shalI be responsible for paying aly publishing
fees which are ii-"*"""" of sot of the lpprication fee ' !f'
at t.he applicant's request, any.matter is postponed for
hearing, causing in.-iiii"t to-be re-published' then' the
entire fee for Jt;;"t;:;"uiication snltt be paid by the
applicant.
ft.
B.
A.
ool-r.r""ats deerned by the co*nunitleveloprnent Department to have significant design, land use or other issues which
nay have a significant impact on the conmunity nay require review by consultants other that town staff. Shoutd a determination be made by the town staff that an outside consultant is needed to review any app1icatJ,on, Community
Development may hire an outside consultant, it sha11 estimate the amount of noney necessary to pay hin or her and this amount shall be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the time he files his application with the Community
Development Department. Upon completion of the review of the application by the consultant, any of the funds forwarded by the applicant for paynent of the consultant which have not. been paid to the consultant shalL be returned to the applicant. Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of the amount forwarded by the applicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicant within 30 days of notification by the Town.
o
A}IIJICATION FOR CONDITIONAI., USO PERMIT
tsTD & 8REAKFAST
LIst of the naroes of
4768 lqeadow Dr.
L,ot2blockTBlghorn
4778 Meado$ Dr.
Katherlne A Cboppln
Mlke Choppln
ouners of property adJacent to
5th addltlon
South
Ibst
dorth
West'
r,ot 1 Elock 5 Blghorn 5th addltou
4816 Junlper lane
Wllllaro Schoen
tracked D Blghorn townhouse Sub.
Mlke choppln , -...5552 TJ CedraL -L,ongbeach Caltf. 90815
L-.--l{1111am Schoen
TOOAdnlrallty Parad'e
Naplesr Florlda ttgt+O
town of VaII
5 .Ly'? L
APPIJICATION I'0R CONCITI0NAI USE PERMIT (sno t BRaaKFAsr)
I II.
I. I have been rentlng nY house to
and a couple downstalrs.
Bo lhe relatlonshlp and lnPact of
sane as lt ls now.
three room rnates ugstalrs
use would be baelclly the
b. the effect of u6e on llght & alr would also be tbe sa'me
as lf I had rooruoates or tf I rented out roons by tbe week.
The bus transportatlon woul,d probably be used nore frequently
wlth a bed anii Breakfast.
the utllltles would be about the sane as lf there nere
pernanent renters or weekly guests.
The schoolg would aot be used by tourests or weekly gueBts'
The parks and recreatlon facllltleswould be used the Sane
rlth Bed &Sreakfast ae nlth nonthly or weekly reuters.
c. The eff,ect on trafflc nay be 6reater, but not slgnlflcantly
There ls enougb parklng on Elght (6spaoes) plus J 1n garage
that there would be no congestlon' plug nlghtly SueEta
are apt to get up later than the worklug people In the
nelghborhood..
the 8no$ renoval ls already ln place and thre ls enouSh
pafklng for 6 to 9 cars-
d, the area ls a reeldentlal area on the edge of blgh denslty
wlth a Park across tbe street.
Theamountofpeop}ethatwouldusethehousewou]'dbe
the sane but the people tould only stay a neek lnsted of
a nonth. Sone of the houses ln the nelghborhood are rented
out weekly by rental agencles ard owtlsfsr
, t./ ' '/t/L#-2;44
orlru ot
.f Ur i.ond D|'l
drt ol .t41,11111, ,ltl, .
I nlnal6;2q
ri.:t.F:
.nd .lah .t
rr|.l ttrta ol
Kl.ArtIn:'n,
l,ot I
ll I nn l. t
lllp,ro"rr I i r r . r r I I , , | - | , , , t t,.f.,i.cnr.(fltrr to tlr,, r' ._, ' - ll I l.rr,
rnrrnrt ,,i .;,,i.;, 1, " , .,.,t,',.1';.t.or.
lLttrnb tn xt htt
x..m. rurr ".riiiri;:ffi
,
L.
I
I
I
I a z
t
?
a
I W10i
&/t0.1-i{rovt qndtf
tntLt
XIftX q\I^W olft
lat jh{tALtu'D(
Vlzzl qe-
A request for a conditional use permit lor a bed and breakfast located in
the Primary/secondary Res'rlential Zone District, at 4768 Meadow Drive,
Lot 1, Block 7, Bighom Subdivision sth Addition.
Applicant:
Planner:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
June 22,1992
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Wolfram Klawiter
Shelly Mello
ll.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE
In December of 1989, the Vail Town Council passed Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1989
to allow Bed and Breakfasts in the Town of Vail. Ths definition in that ordinance
states:
'A Bed and Breakfast means a business which accommodates guesb in a
dwelling unit in which the Bed and Breakfast proprietor lives on ths premises
and is in residence during the Bed and Breakfast use."
The Klawiters have applied for a conditional use permit to allow them to use 3
bedrooms in their home, which is located in the Primarylsecondary Residential zone
district, for a Bed and Breakfast rental. The uea lo be used for bed and breakfast
contains a total of 500 square feet. 2 guests could stay in each bedroom for a total of
6 guests.
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review ol Section 18.60, the Community Development Department recommends
approval of fie conditional use permit based upon the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. Relationshio and imoact of the use on the develooment obiectives ol the
Town.
The Town.Gouncil encourages Bed and Breakfasts in the Town of Vail
as a favorable type of lodging for tourists.
I
2. The effect of the use on liqht and air, distribution of pooulation.
transoortation facilities. utilities, schools. oarks and recreation facilities,
and other public facilities needs-
6 guests can be accommodated at one time, and it is unlikely that there
would be more than 3 guest vehicles. There is a Town of Vail hls stop
In the vicinity. lt is felt that the impact on the use of parks and
recreation facilities and on transportation facilitibs would be minimal.
3. Etfect uoon traflic with oarticular reference to conoestion. automotive
and oedestrian safetv and convenience. taftic flow and control. access.
maneuverabilitv. and removal of snow from lhe steet and oarkino aIE as.
It is likely that there would be 3 additional vehicles driving to lhe Klawiter
residence. Staff leels that this would be an insignificant impact upon
traffic.
4- Effect uoon the character of the area in which the orooosed use is to be
located. includino the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to
sunoundino uses.
The stafl feels that the character of the area will not be negatively
impacted by the addition of a Bed and Breakfast in this area. No
exterior changes to the residen@ are proposed to accommodate he
Bed and Breakfast.
5. Bed and Breakfast Ooerations mav be allowed as a conditional use in
those zone districts as specified in Title 18 ol the Vail Municioal Code
lor Ordinance No. 31. Series of 1989. Bed and Breakfast Operations
shall be subiect to the followino requirements:
a. Offstreet desiqnated oarkino shall be required as follows:
One soace lor the owner/proorietor plus one space for lhe first
bedroom rented olus 1/2 space for each additional bedroom
rentecl.
The Klawiter property contains 3 enclosed and 6 exterior parking
spaoes. The parking requirement for the other side of the duplex
and the Bed and Breakfast is 5 parking spaces.
b. Enclosed trash facilities and reoular oarbaoe removal service
shall be orovided.
The trash containers will be housed in the garage with regular
trash pick-up.
c. Removal of landscaoino for the orovision ol additional oarkino is
stronolv discouraoed.
I
There will be no removal of landscaping.
d. Each Bed and Breaklast shall be allowed'one resldential name
cor!9.
A name plate has not been applied for at this time.
e. lf a Bed and Breakfast ooeration shall use orooertv or facilities
oaRinq soaces or a drlvewav in duolex subdivisions bv wav ol
examole and not limitation. the written aooroval of the other
orooertv owner. owners. or aDolicable onners' assooiation shall
be required to be submitted with the aoolication for a conditional
use oermit.
Not applicable.
IV. FINDINGS
The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followino findinos before
orantino a conditional use oermit for a Bed and Breakfast ooeration:
A. That the proposed location of the use is in accord with the purposes of this
Ordinance and the purposes of the dislrict in which the site is located.
B. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would
be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to he public health, safety,
or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
C. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of
this Ordinance.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department staff recommends approval of this
application for a Bed and Breakfast operation. Staff tinds that all applicable review
criteria and findings have been satisfactorily met.
o o z
@ {v c o
=o z
T
rrl n
={
---
--{o
@ m Is LO l=8 E Ilo 4 l"i9 e fPe l l!-i g ItrP o liq I l=t i I-
o.<4o-d3 9,t ctl >e z?5 !):
.r1
m
=
EI
@
=0 z
E
m t-m
-
r
tr
m o -
z
t-
n+
ar'
R<zx
3i oz.
9>
c c
;
!
t-
=
=
$!q () ..)
- --l c)o>iD t-
o 9,
-l rrl 7z :afi of,t --t >or-
T
=m
o €z m
I
2
=T
=
-it -5 o
=x
q,{
n (D -
E
.D x
EF o>
.l1r
t- \,'i
zl "l
I l-,l
lFl 15 (D
lo t-I-'E
l=l t('r I lcl- l\'l
l-l tl tl rl
m t-m
ld
l€
lz
le t<l>I-
IH
l9)
lz
l
=
-l
€z
'11
-:o m
9'z o
I ld
t=lz
le
l>
lF II
lm
t0
lz
n d
=z
o I
;
!
m gt
d €z
o .tl
F
ft
m
F)z I
I
=
€
(1)
-5
i
I
t-
I'l
I ,)
=
o f =
l-
m
z
3 m
t
D!8.
-n -t Or
z=
2z oo z
0z tq m;
L lol l.r. o t59 l,i :l-o | '"1
!m ft
=-l -l o
@ m x
m .D
-{
o z
c o o
U'
-{m
cr
C}l+H
(-r,r
5
(cIO-d3E o9d
6Pg
R 6s is;+
=o o .<R€
1(g lF3 f-*o:1 f
-,o 9)f *-
*!-i d=
=-f2 3oo
Q 3.a r9.B aH=
O *s,
sd€
E IrE 6'= =-f +i;
6 9.3
8 3'1
?rJ(D .<=go
=9P fx, -.srdr =< =JF=5 gf jE9.
o-l aR d'
lci
iEg s;9
iq€
ll'o='
!r =o
ni O)<.{
'nat
at :l EO.
cio fo
s=-to
oan fo
P5 =--
Og
o8 oo
F4
33 o.*oo 3*qe
o-{
33
9ai ON .oo vr=o5'
-(cl fs {o.
3e fEr ,o*1, S_E@.
Es ,9o \9
+<l
6-@ do.FO YU,6'f
z o
-l I
m
o €z m t
€o o
m r m
!:,
0,vl o
o 0,J L
I m
m riI H;g
6
z
at,c t-
-{F
z.
ztoc)0 9B 9*;*=;ti P=3 A B] E S vr2=
<t v'
I | | lil | | | 13 l
=gBF eega il :;=e2
!l'
z m €
m
-{o z
><
=z
r-
m
I
m
'tt
o
-i
I
^z
q,
5 o,
(D
ONF
8E E ;Ei F g
l3a i9 lon o <tl lLr" 8I lod z g E l= z .tt
lce 9 2 l-r€
ls!
P>
lgl N o =l;lGi
=Fl
-s€
tsl tol tol l5l
I
G)
i
.It
m
i
5 7 z m
5
Or o
N)ro o
o o O
I (.t)
F
I
(o
I
.o
u
r-
m
z,
2 o
F
7
z o z
I m q,
-
o €p,
IA
r+
It o
a,t
tn
t?o
ur o
o
=
Zl ol
3l z
atl ,>l <l -l
I
I
I
I
ll -l
I
ES z\\of\
N
N Rl
F
t
$
I
I
--t
t-
m 2
q
-n
m m
U''
c (t
m
-.t
x
o t-m
?
m
o I -{
m
z
m
m {
m
m
z -n
m m
=m
z
D l-
t-
=@ z
m
m
i
|-
z
m
x
z
m
--l
.It
m 7
=
='Tl
m m
UI
VATTATION
!m v
=
=z
9
m
z
|-
!t-
2
m t-Itl a
7 o
t-
o
F c,2
o)
(tr
o
(,
O o o
f\)(o
o o (,
\J (Jr
o o
F ul o
o o
f\)
o o
o o
o O
O)r\)F 5
o O
(o (o
b o
F ctl 5
o o
(o
o
cJ-.}- nz6g \>4A
9. - 30 -rp--
o o z a {
c
C)
=o z
T m n
=-{
o
H
. frR,-.. a .'
sFF li e i
z=E |: c e 17 ls* 8 l<r I l=P 5 L]EE i 5 rp\ 6€Et 1 *z< o t 99 s 3
=6".!Y_ 6s m.+I
m
=
OZ
-i
^q;
o
>-i qn z
.>
m
z m
I)
C)
=
m
--l
c)
ao -{m uz ,>m
-r>or
qr
=
r-1 ;c)>;o:--{ o o>
a)O-rr 2;
-1 C aJ ;'>=
1Z
T r z o
{ti in lO It€'lz
lo
l-Yl t<lI F
lm lo I'lz l.
I
t-{
r=
lz
i-n
l<t>t-t-
lm
IF'
lz
l9
l 4
t\
\
\
I
I
: ,.
\
lr
lc)l{
lz lo
l'n t<t>
r-
lm lo
lz
n
{\
\
\
I \
ol<
=,F <F b p
v
I
-i -l
I
I
I
.\
f
\
s
\
}\
a
-.{
l:
l€
lz lo l'n
r<l>
t:
lm
lc)
l=
t9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
:a
=
''T
--f,'
l{to
l€
lz
l-n t<I>
tn
lyt
la
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5H3a ' o! lri
iax-€
;g ifl
s.:. i 3 !.'< R {o{Eo-'
'.;
- O) ./T J-4=o-=o'"(,)oYf
ca*+oR!-
5:3{
"' Aat o i s ed 6io*
.ilO)
=o6 =(Ot 4(2 *6-3o'O-=.o
-D qt!a5; ff
;t a !.6
;s +=
d34&isg3
-JIf-.*"dt
s .=-r-, Jo =
s=;e <o-=0.aP d
3 BE j
o:ai9
R 31o
o-(l <a:.,ERA oiiXo
!Y(,(D=.
'6'9 ts P f (D --
o
{
!t E E
o
.o t
=o
3
@
=
5'
o
@
!t
o.
l\o
t\-x \\:\\ ot
trl \ f,
z
-{I m
o €z m t $:Jq,
9.
\o \ lr t3
\\;t.P N=
=o
o-
6',
n
€o
.9
m
f m
a)
o-
Cl
:
-m
i
^ --{o=x "Pn t-
z
an c t-
--t
o z
b€
;=z
c
=
c)o o
3
:o z
z
m
u
o
2-4,omo -n6 t:c3 m'<m P= 3 Bl z A2
-i
lrl ttl l\J I I
ttt
zo o<
<2 m
'_:,1 33
;x 2-ao z
z m {
5
i m
1 o z
_i
z
t-
n
an
H
4
m
6
-n
c
--t
z
[I
N[
6)N m^zY2 iF gS
>-n 'X z o 18 ?9
5!" 3 E '-6< S b 12 t2 aOO O 1'nzz
iE
xu;.
$l I
\
\
(.t
--l
-{
I
z m
$
r,
-$s o a
^
I
+
.
$
+
D
\D
t
7t
m
C
;\
d
:b
5
F
t
!
$
P
F
Nz
t6 lF
7 i9 'z ;o .Z \o .J Ini )e
:E
f lltl
ib :b
H
t\l
N'
hi
l3N'
IF
ry ti
I
ll
ir
il
:l
I
I
I
I
I
I
,l
il
I
I
I
I
I
o I
r .It
m
='Tl
m m U'
c
m
-t
x
o
m
z c _9
m
l
m I
€
o
q]
-.1
z
tTl m
(/\
m o
z o
c
m
m
o
z
g
2
_o
=
m
3
=-n
m m u)
I
VALUATION
'0
m :,3 t
2 o
=m c,
z 6
!t-c
=
2
m
rtl
-l
f-
C
\^
q
c\
o
(^J
c\
c\
t..,
N s
-4J
\
q
\
N
q
c\
L
o
o
N
q
\t
{S.a $
\q
-\
-A
\
{
()z
-{ Y.m;,
tl
I lo lo llt l<lo l-n
'o
m
-
-{o
m x
n
o z (-gT
at t
m
O O ts (f,(,
CD
-+
o o
/
l/2 r^
1R 2..
qD6
o
4 //:r,0s
RID 6E EL T.tgs't
,-1,"1
Y
9
3i:;rt; jii' .."116'?."3 r-';- ''.---;
"','\r."
!. \.!'\ l'
-_J at ;t
i-*t i:_i
'I
i
i--_l
i-.-'l
I L.-J
1''A) d/l rdii- 1r/,
'V.?6s"/"t"*/o*D'
)f,,
.O r^ry €r
t.
//,
) | | -,1 E^c.! Vtt'".':'
- j,-
.;:'
1
!.r 'i .'';-. '.
" 1-t'
5rr "S gH:lA: u: '.
RlD6[. Ctty -
/ 33'
.\
o
iti rlii
'" ' '-'llli*--
t i
HYDRO.TRIAD. LTD.
Lokewood, Colorodo
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
T
T
I
I
I
t
t
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
oo ao
KAC
AVALANCHE IMPACT PARAMETERS
WOLF KLAI,IITER RESIDENCE
BIGHORN 5th ADDITION SUBDIVISION
VAIL, COLORADO
February, 1981
Prepared for:
l.lolf Klawiter
P.0. Box 255
Vai1, Colorado
HYD;':O.TNIAD, LTD.
12687 West Cedar Dri ve
Suite 100
Lakewood, Col orado 80228
(303) 989-1264
I
I
I
I
t
T
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
t
I
I
I
or lo
KAC
AVALANCHE IMPACT PARAMETERS
t.lOLF KLAWITER RESIDENCE
BIGHORN 5th ADDITION SUBDIVISION
VAIL, COLORADO
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
GENERAL
IMPACT PRESSURES AND FLOW DEPTH .
DEFENSE STRUCTURES
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE I: KAC AVALANCHE IMPACTS - WOLF KLAWITER RESIDENCE
t
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
t
t
I
I
I
t
t
t
I
t
oo oo
HYDBO.TRIAD, LTD.
February 27, l98L
Mr. Wolf Klawiter
Post 0ffice Box 255
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Klawiter:
Enclosed is a copy of the report on the Avalanche Impact upon
proposed residential h-ouse locateil in the moderate hazard zone for
hvaianche Runout Zone in Vail, Colorado. This study was performed
authorization provided bY You.
If there are any questions, please contact my office.
Si ncerely,
HYDRO-TRIAD, LTD.
your
the KAC
under the
eh/Rfr4n
Ronald L. HalleY, Jr. ' ,.r. ./
Pres i dent
RLH: mgk
Encl: Report
12687 WEST CEDAR DRIVE - SUITE 1OO LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80228 PHONE 303-989-1264
t
T
I
I GENERAL
oo oo
KAC
AVALANCHE IMPACT PARAMETERS
l,lOLF KLAWITER RESIDENCE
vAIL, C0L0RAD0
t Subsequent to the preparation of the K A C Avalanche Study prepared by
I R. L. Halley during the spring and summer of 1975, and the following review
I of impact pressures on one of the proposed KAC Townhouses (Si I ver State
I Unit), a specific request was received for the probable impact pressures and
I
flow heights that can be expected for the proposed res'idence on Lot 1,
I Bighorn 5th Addition Subdivision, Vail, Colorado.
I The scope of work for the original study included definition of the
avalanche parameters and the runout zone delineat'ion. These items were
I presented in detail within the original report and are not repeated herein.
I t Examination of the probable impact pressures for the proposed residence
r was based upon the probable snow densities and velocities from a large
I ! (approximately 100 year recurrence material) avalanche.
t
t
I
t
|
-1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
oo
Damming Height (m) (ftt
620
Since the building is skewed regard to the flow vector of the
avalanche, the damming height can be estimated to be about 4.0 meter
I (13.0 feet). The norma'l loadings on the unprotected southwest face of the
proposedresidencewouldbeapproximate,'@whiIetheloadingon
I the southeast face would be about 1b/tt
t
I
t
I
I
T
I
or I
I IMPA'T PREssuREs AND FLow DTPTH
Computation of the probable impact pressures' flow depth and danning
I heights requires defining the velocity of a dry flowing avalanche at the
I building. This has been accompljshed based upon a major climax avalanche
I that would run to the limits of the rnoderate or infrequent runout zone. The
recurrence interval of this type of event is on the order of 100 years +-
I
Avalanche Fl ow Characteristics
at l.lolf Klawiter Residence
KAC Avalanche
Vel oci ty Fl ow Depth
(m/s ) (nph ) (m) (lt)
7.0 16 r.7 5.6
-2-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
T
I
ol ol
DEFENSE STRUCTURE OR TRAINING DIKE
Since the loadings on the southwest facing wall of the proposed resi-
dence are rather large, the option of providing some type of defense struc-
ture for the building was evaluated. A structure to protect the building
would need to be as'l ow as possible, in order to be economically or aesthe-
tically acceptable.
This can be accomplished by a training dike on the south and west of
the proposed residence, having:
(i) an angle of impact as low as possible;
(ii) a t horizontal to L vertical slope on the uphill face.
The damming height on the dike has been estimated to be about 1.8 meter
(6 feet), yielding a total design height of:
- flow depth + danrning height = 1.7 +1.8 = 3.5 meter (f1.5 feet)
In this case, a safety factor 1.0 can be assumed, since it applies to a
moderate or infrequent runout zone.
A suggested dike section is shown on Figure l.
-3-
t oo
I c'NcLUSr'Ns AND RE''MMENDATI'NS
oo
I
t The proposed residence for Lot l lies within the moderate or inter-
I mediate hazard zone of the ava'lanche runout area. The impact pressures that
I
would result from the running of a major climax avalanche (dry flowing type)
t on the southwest wal'l of the unit (without a special defense structure)
I would be approximately 203 lbs/ft2. The snow would pile up against the wall
I (assuming the wall withstood the pressure) to a depth of approximately 13
I feet. The recurrence interval of this type of event is on the order of 100
years.
The location and configuration of a training dike is shown on Ffgure I.
I The critica'l factors in the configuration are its orientation to the ava-I
lanche flow, the upstream slope (1 horizontal to l vertica'l ) and the total
I height of the dike (11.5 feet). t.tith the training or defense dike, the
I
loadings on the structure drop to essentially zero. The windows of the house
r on the southwest and southeast side should be double pane and one pane
I should incorporate wire mesh to minimize danger of flying glass in case of a I
powder avalanche pressure wave.
I
I
t
t
I
t
I
-4-
,*rt"toN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
AM PM
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUTIBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
r-r ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
D HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH N EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIB
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED g REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
IN
*
SPE
, . -.+ir f.'
CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI AM PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER tr FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEEB " PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
O SHEETROCK
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
tr o
tr )1r,*o.-FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH o
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL--7 tr FINAL
:-,aa {p6' oveo N DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
COBRECTIONS:
INSPECTION REOUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
INSPECTION:MON ,!i
CALLER
UR UES T 'v(
WED
\/
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS i STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEE-
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V,
tr ROUGH / WATER tr FRAMINd
r-r ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION O POOL / H. TUB
tr
tr
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr ROUGH
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr
o
tr
SUPPLY AIR
FINAL
MAPPBOVED
otLo**="r,o*r'
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
I ,*rfr"rroN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI AM PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
E FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETBOCK
tr POOL/ H. TUB
NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL O FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr BEINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
,*rt"toN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
JOB NAME
INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
AM PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
o
D
tr
tr
tr
tr
FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
ROOF & SHEEH
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
NAIL tr
D
FINAL tr FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
-
I ,*rt"toN REouEsr
DATE JOB NAME
CALLER
READY FOR INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI
TOWN OF VAIL
AM PM
LOCATION:
BU!LDING:
tr FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
O ROUGH / D.W.V.
D ROUGH / WATER
ON / STEEL
n ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING E GAS PIPING
O INSULATION
-
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
n
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
B TEMP. POWER
tr ROUGH
tr CONDUIT
n
tr POOL/ H. TUB O INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK NAIL o
tr tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
,*.G"rroN REouEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE JOB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECT,ION:MON .:i.' .
CALLER
TUES THUR FRI AM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUG|"+/ D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
ON / STEEL
rr ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING
tr INSULATION
-
tr GAS PIPING
tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
-
tr
OD
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
tr ROUGH
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
E ;,'' o
tr FINAL D FINAL
. g-appnoveo
-,CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
f=:
,*Jf,"toN
TOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL
DATE 1 ,.:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
,'MON ,
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI AM PM READY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
T] FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
F FOUNDATION / STEEL
n ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK.
E FINAL
tr
tr
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
SUPPLY AIR tr CONDUIT
,F APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
,*rt"toN REouEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE JOB NAME
CALLER
READY FOR INSPECTION: MON
.I .. ., -,.:
TUES WED THUR .AM:
PM FRI
LOCATION
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
O ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH/ WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
O FRAMING
BOOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOLi H. TUB
O SHEETROCK NAIL
O FINAL
ELE
Ql
trF
trC
tr-
O EXHAUST HOODS
TEMP. POWER
O SUPPLY AIR
tr APPBOVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr,REINSPECTION REQUIRED
Jl
.": ,,it,
DATE INSPECTOR
DATE
,*r?="rroN REouEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
JOB NAME
INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI AM PM READY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH /WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOOOS
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
E APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
t tlt g.httY/vail
,*rt"toN neouisr
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
MON ,WED THUR .AM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
EI UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
t] FOUNDATION / STEEL
D FRAMING
r-.r ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
T] INSULATION tr
tr
D
POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELE
trT
trF
trc
tr_
CTRICAL:MEGHANICAL:
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL O FINAL
p APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
*
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VA|L
LJAIE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES WED -T-HUR
PM FRI AM
BU
trl
trl
trl
I trl
l
trl
r,i'
ILDING:PL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
UMBING:
FOOTINGS i STEEL UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER GAS PIPING PLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH n
tr
o
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
t1
------- -'7 tr FINAL =.'' ,1 FINAL
'')
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
4''PPROVED 1:,
::-)PECTION REQUIRED
./ .'- l' /' ,.D^rE 47L<t_/=-E- |NSPECTOR
,*.t".oN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
AM PM
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
E FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEEB " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION O POOL/ H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
D
tr FINAL D FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
O HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT O SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL O FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
JOB NAME
INSPECTION . TOWN OF
;, ., / | ./!,,'t f | 1 :,tr
REQUEST
VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
CALLI
INSPECTION:MON t*$ES-",
,.. "--.--- /
7..oa AM.PMi t/\/
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
D
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
n
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V,
ROUGH / WATER O FRAMING
r_r ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
O INSULATION
fl SHEETROCK
/r-t'
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH tr
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
VED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
INSPECTOR
*t
INSPECTION REQUEST
VAIL
DATE
a)-)',r'-'5
SP
{r
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES /-:, \
. rr1r l WED THUR READY FOR
LOCATION:
TOWN OF
,4
BU
trl
tr
tr
trl
Y
Etr
tr
ILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
FOOTINGS / STEEL
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEEB tr GAS PIPING PLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
o
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
O CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr #-_tr
tr FINAL
PROVED tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
JOB NAME
INS
:
t
PECTION
TOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
CALLER
MON TUES THUR FRI WED AM PM
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
O ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH i WATER
D
tr
FOOTINGS / STEEL
FOUNDATION / STEEL
d''rnnnlttrue
- ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
D INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H, TUB
NAIL
tr
o FINAL
tr
o FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
D TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
D
o
tr
tr
ROUGH tr
n
D
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
FlNK(FINAL
.-..-,81, APPROVED
' CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIHED
DATE INSPECTOR
INSPECTION
TOWN OF
',.^ ,, ! |
REQUEST
VAIL
L'AItr
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
JUES,READY FOR
LOCATION:
WED THUR PM FRI
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr FOUNDATION / STEE-tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
F RouGH / wATER joi l"-/
tr GAS PIPING
tr POOL / H. TUB
n_
r-l
O FINAL
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
D EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
-
r-r _
.'-i oFTNAL+
FRAMING
tr
r-1
tr
D
o
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK NAIL
FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
tr
D
tr
ROUGH
CONDUIT
EI FINAL
D APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
;; ; / .,a/t .fifrD SAPPROVE D -,,,.E--RE I NSPECTION R EQU I RED
DATE INSPECTOR.
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAiL
DATE JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES WED THUR (I3;)PM AM READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGBOUND
tr ROUGH / D.W,V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
tr
tr
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
O SHEETROCK NAIL tr
!
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
N TEMP. POWER
MEGHANICAL:
D HEATING
F
tr
tr
ROUGH n
o
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
''RppRoveo tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIREO
7'\'coRREcloNS:
DATE INSPECTOR
t
PE
t.
l
tNs
tl
CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON .,
CALLER
TUES READY FOR
LOCATION:
WED THUR FRI AM PM
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL O FINAL
ELE
ET
{r
EIC
tr-
CTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
.E
DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
DATE JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI
INSPECTION REOUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
READY FOR
LOCATION:
AM PM
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
O INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tl
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL T] FINAL
E APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
F,'i
' Uulto*lt ,Z- (
INSPECTION TOWN O
REQUEST
VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME )rd r/ (,(ar
CALLER
INSPECTION:MoN (J_gE-s-,THUB FRI
l-a{)t,f-
WED
4AE \],^l/-\
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
E
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER tr FRAMING
_ ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
O SHEETROCK
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
1.,*o'
tr
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
D
rl
tr
ROUGH tr
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
F4,PPROVED
coRkcroNs:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
75 soulh ftonlage road
Yail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
,Ju1y 1l, .|985
olflce ol communlty developmenl
Wolfram Klawiter P.0. Box 255 Vail, Colorado 81658
Re: Vol leyball Court at 4768 Meadow Drive,
Lot I, Block 7, Bighorn 5th
Dear Wolfram:
Recently the Town organized several meetings with residents of the B'ighorn_area to discuss possible improvemeits to Bighorn park. Due t9 lhq-fact that your volleyball court is partially located on Town ot vatl prgpgrty, the.Town and neighbors would like to know if you would be willing to share that volieybal'l court with the generai
publ i c.
Please let me know what your opin.ion is concerning this request. I have tried to call you several'times but have beefr unable-io rina ar\yone at home.
Please give me a call as soon as possible.
Si ncerely,
Krifun ?^t
Kristan Pritz
Town Planner
75 south lronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
July 3, 1984
offlce of communlty development
Wolfram Klawiter
P.0. Box 255
Vail, Colorado 8.|658
Re: Volleyball Court at
4768 Meadow Drive
Lot I , Bl k 7, B'ighorn 5th
Dear l^lolf,
I have'looked at your new volleyball court. It appears that a port'ion of
the court is on Town of Vail property. In order to verify the exact
location of the court, I am requesting that you submit a site improveirent
survey of your property from a certified surveyor's office. The Town
needs to confirm the locatjon of the court for liability reasons.
In addition, if the court is on Town property, permission r^ras never
obtained from the Town. I would like to receive the survey as soon as
possible and no later than July 25th.
If you have further questions, please call me.
cooperati on.
Sj ncerely,
rt | 0'l
1irifiu",tnt?
KRISTAN PRITZ
KP: br
Thanks for your
o o z
U)
-{7'c o
=o z
E
FT F
={
q,z
=q m;Ir t^IHv lzo loI lz"'lZ 'n
>a -m
l$ .^r F<-=
F{€o t-@
m x m .t.|
-t
z
f m
EI
-
-.1 o
(D
m
Iq LO l-tt -{ l-.; o <x f
m: 6
Cla:;x.+ri g mP o a)irO <-{ t -:m=-'rJ
3t
o<To 6P
-.D q=
Ct,>t i9
'n
m
+
t<tf tT:
D<J L ]LJ
3trP
zn=
v=r x
f lt-Fl . -. - 94 5 - 'r.'{ A:* >=E os,
F lz
4z
i
O O
CN
ct)
t-
z
H
|I]
m
c)-
z.
=
o
z
--.t
-l
o O-p Zt-
A=
-1 2 .i=
l-m o {
;
r-
z -{
o -t
Za
nz >m
--l >
o _T-
=m
--l 'Tl
=z
t*t2
I
I
lul l'{:.tl IF
I
I
I
I
z
T
^t-
€
H
(t
o 0
fi
5
E
{
r
F
I
5'
.)o Z.\
an
c)E
=l>.F
E
H
I
I
I
=l
I
I
I
ll
l{
lz lo
li r-l!lm
l6-,lz
IJ
ld
l€
lz
le t<t>lr
ln
lF,lz
5
-J o\
I
5
@
I -.r mlO rlt
le t<l>
t:
IF
la
I
I
I
ld
l€
lz
le I<l>l-
lB lz
I
I
l--r to
l=to l'r
l<l>
lF II
lfl
7(o O'r
=:r5 \e !ao
3 6gg o^ X ^._ x *:
Y =gr O
=.'< R €o{Eo
=+ai,;i ; :66
o,(DYf.
F 1:l
\r5o (D x- <lnrO
=.tlr
of9*3 *o f (o9+@
O *=E
-:+dt
-J =-o'6 '". o't^==
v'J-i=
53ils
5 E.; E
D",^f ? =i =g
':.L --ts=9oQ-
=tgJ Xforo
<o-f 0:aP o'
-q)=i a:Ei'
Sua=e33Q
O-O--!
o
o {
q)
!
o
c l a
3
c-
s
f (o
o
o
l o.
J \o c\ ^
a\- r | \.R
)i;
\to Y-r ril a r\\ t
{-;
\ \\0,tr
o
I'o
>u>z^
r>
mc 6n YM
zO m-n
€z
m
I
o
z -t
o --l
_n
I
m r _Tl
i!oa
="
l
I
--T--
XX
@lv)-t--{>t =
2l-r :6t -l z t>
IT t<l=l@ li
E
m o
x i< l=
-i=
I
fro<>n-!-.1m
c:iei IJ
o {
0
l0Tnr-n ;
= i9
ii lo r-r----T---
iil ll
.--.f
iz
z
I
I
c
€
a
D c
=-l
o o o
o q
c
c
=
c
-I
o-o
P]
P',l ;l
l
z
i
--.1 m
--l
z
,
=z
I
_!
!
c
c
z
ol
rql >l HI rrl Fl
rf; ::",6 F {-N-
=Pio EP 23 sg ?9
o <Jr.lrr- *;B6= <3 '"1294 - "r lrto o O ni= z
>o z4 u>
"ri ->l No=anlNm=t-v)l cr' a fdl
Fl tr<gl
=.t
I
I
I
\)
o z z
z 6
-i
Fo HZ F;FA
tq@ zc
x2
Fl u,
HZ
z1 m
Fs2
bl
|q
c)
8l tt FUI FI
HI >l
ol
;t
I
I
_c
zo Oz
!- 'n >.n zo v;tt:t r-
ts z
a
F'P z
7
z
FJ !
-{
t-
m
=
='Tt
m
m
c (/,
m
o
z
C
m
I
m I
z
m
€
(D
m
--t
z
m
=
I
z o
t-
c
-
m .)--l
.)
z o I tn
x
@ c
=
m
=
m
3
=-n
m m
VATUATION
m
3
=z
l.
l:lL
ln
l+
l'
Fj
rJ
Fi
3 m o I
z
l-c
2
m
m o
^
g
2 f)
NJ 5.}.
t.J
LN
s
(;.)
&5
F.
(])(])s.
C{E'6'l @lzlqr 4.6
.r.-lt^Irt /<'yJ/
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
p
onre l) 3 I / JoB NAME -- /<?rU,
CALLER
READY FOR INSPECTION:MON
LOCATION:
tr DISAPPROVED
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
THUR FRI
tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
{sl
E APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
/'-'-\rutrJ \ vvtrty
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
D ROUGH i D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
ON / STEEL
A'\N tr 4 qH trtrEl
" PLYWOOD NAILING F GAS PIPING
E INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
)l
T1 N POOL / H. TUB
NAIL o
o
.
tr
tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
D TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
! HEATING
tr
tr
D
ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr
n FINAL
DATE INSPECTOR
st/r'
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
INSPECTION REQUEST'
VAIL
JOB NAME ^l DATE
READY FOB
LOCATION:
AM 6r'l-l''\r___/,P
BUILDING: PLUMBING:
D FOOTINGS i STEEL D UNDERGROUND
-
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL O ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
" Eitfi;"%tJ*'iL-,*o t',oo, prprNc /A{V-
I o TNSULATTO*
-
D POOL/H TUB
tr SHEETBOCK NAIL - D
' r-l
! FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL: MECHAI|I.CAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
EI ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
l-1
tr FINAL tr FINAL
,! neenoveo O DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
TOWN OF
SPECTION:
INSPECTOR
The ltens belort
glving a pernlt
Please check off
INSPECTION' S
need to be coEplete
a flnal C of 0.
ln the box provlded.
CO}'PLETED
before
tr
tr
[]
FINAL I{ECHANICAT.
DATE: I t5
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY
DATE:
FINAI ELECTRICAT
DATE:
II II II FINAI BUILDING EAST SIDE:WEST SIDE:
DATE:
TN,IPORARY C OF O
DATE:
I
i CERTIFICATE OF OCCIJPANCY
DATE:
I
I
I LANDSCA?ING DI'E
DATE:
FILE NN.TE:
Planning and Environmerttal commission
FebruarY .l4, .|983
PRE SEN T
l^lil I Trout
Diana Donovan
Dan Corcoran
Jim Vjele
Duane Piper
Jim Morgan
ABSENT
Gordon Pierce
STAFF PRESENT
Peter Patten
Peter Jamar
Larry Esklith
D'ick Ryan
Betsy Rosoi ack
Donovan corrected the last sentence in
"Perhaps have each developer grade and
to h js property. I'
the second to the last paragraph to read:
have ready for paving the bike path adiacent
mi nutes Janua r
t.
Donovan moved and Pi r seconded to a rove e minutes as correc!e1!Vote was 6-0.
uest for a hei radu lex which extends 2.2 feet above the
on.
cant:
Peter Jamar #pla lion, ddding that the structure was built .7 ' be'low
existing gr{de, making varjance request one for 2.9' rather than for 2'2 feet
;;:;;i;jr;iTv-6"ji.u"4. He showed improvement surveys and elevations and exp'lained
that the imp-rovement survey th;t had be"" submjtted to the Town had been altered to
Fred Arrner, a neighbor, said that he had no obiection to the extra height.
that he did not feel cutting
itrow a different slab elevation than actually existed. In checking with the surveyor'
ii-wai iound that the fin'ished grade of the structure was actually.lower than existing
orade. and thus the need for the increase in the amount of the vafliance. Dave Green,
iepreienting Klawiter, stated that Klawiter recognized that he had made an erro|i n
heiqht, but-had no financial gain to make jn the-error, He sajd that the neighbors
gav6 fivorable replies to a 16tter, arrd the DRB members were also in agreement.
Scott Edwards, another neighbor, felt the same and added
the top off of the house was a viable solution.
Donovan fel t
not have any settjng, She
zon'ingi code .
hardship, and
act, and that
that hardship
that thjs was a difficult situatr'on because although the neighbors did
objections, it was poss'ib1e that E'I'anting the variance woul.d be precedent
added that variances were to be granted only upon the findinqs in the
Viele asked. Eskwjth if this could be considered an unnecessary physica'l
Eskwjth answered that deciding to grant the variance was a balancing
perhaps the board would consider this hardship self created. He added
was not the only criterja to consider.
va riance
franr Klawiter
PEC 2 /14 /83
Vie] e felt the reaction of the neighbors was irnportant, since the code was written
to qive protection to neighbors. He was in favor of the variance, since the cure
of rirod jfying the roof I jne was worse than the ill,
Piper asked for an explanation of the height differences. Green explained that the
lot was fjlled to have adequate drainage, and Klawjter took the existing grade to
be the grade after fii1. Klaliter stated that he had made an error in the distance
frorn the slab to the ridge of 2.2' in framing. Jannr added that the slab was not
placed ypon fill but was in fact .7 feet below the existing grade, making the error 2.9 feet because the height is measured to whichever grade is more restrictjve
Piper felt that the neighbors' input was important and agreed with the DRB that the
existing building was better than taking chunks off of the top.
Piper moved to grant the request for a varjance to subiect property and hjs findings
,
safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity, and that the variance was warranted for the reason that the strict or I iteral
interpretation and enforcement of the spec'ified regulation would deprive the applicant
of privfleges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district.
Morgan asked if the house !(as restricted to part of the lot because of the avalanche path, and Klawjter answered that it was. Larry Eskwith explained that Piper needed to make the additional finding that the granting of the variance would not constitute
a grant of special privilege, etc. Piper r'rithdrew his motion.
Morgan moved and Viele seconded to grant the varjance of 2.9 feet in hejght with the
fol I owing findings :
That the granting of the variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other propert'ies classified in the same district.
That the grant'ing of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare, or materjally injurious to properties or improvements in the vic'inity.
That the variance was wamanted for the following reasonsl
There are exceptions or extraordinary cr'rcumstances or conditjons app'l icable to
the site of the variance that do not apply general'ly to other properties in the
same zone and
The strict or'l jteral 'interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulat'ion
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties
in the same district.
The vote was 4 in favor. 1 a g9-us!-(-q*qro-v-er )and I abstention (Q.Sr_c. eran)._.
Dick Ryan arrived.3. Discussion of..construct i on robl erns
l
Dick Ryan stated
Conmri ss ion rev i ew
the Council would
of currentrpol icies
I ike to receive the
th*would I jke the Planning and Environnrental
and various recontmendations. He added that
recolrnrendations by t'larch .l5.
t
Planning and Environnrental Commission
February 14, 1983
2:15 pm Site inspection
3:00 pm Public Hearing
: 'l , Approva'l of minutes of meeting of January 24, 1983.
L Request for a height variance for a duplex which extends - 2,? feet above the height limit of 33 feet on lot 1, block 7,Bighorn 5th Addition.
App'licant: Wolfram Klawiter
!g Oiscussion of core construction problems.
4. Request for an amendment to Section G Views and Focal Points of the
Vail Vi1'lage Urban Design Guide PIan--Design Considerations to include
language which protects views whose deterioration could be caused by
development outside of the Commercial Core I Zone District.Applicant: Town of Vail
Published in the Vail Trai'l February ll,1983.
MEMORANDUM
T0: Planning and Environmental Department
FROM: Department of Community Deve'l opment
DATE: February 7' .1983
suBJECT: Request for a 2.2'height variance upon 1ot l, b'l ock 7' Bighorn 5th
ACdition. Appl icant: hlol fram Klawiter
DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED
The applicant requests a 2.2 foot height variance from the required 33 foot
maximum he,ight altowed in-ttre Resideniial Primary/Secondary zone district' The
jf,;j;;;r;;iui"i tnit ttre reason for requesting.the variance is that an err6r
was made in the .onii"uiiion-oi tn" building which result-ed in the roof ridge
tlirii'z.zi"hil;";-t[u"-.ip"ou"o. The ridse-heisht is 35.2 feet.
CRITERIA,AND FINDINGS
review of criteria an@ of
ET
the Munic Code
The relationshi of the uested variance tS-q$er.-exj$j ntia'l uses
and structures in the v ci n r l.y.
The'deqree to which rel lqf flqn the strict or ltqlql interpretation qnd
enforcement of a s ation is necessaryIo achieve ccxnPat 'it
in tle vicin tv or to attain ob.i ecti ves
The duptex is currently under construction and is adjacent to Bighorn Park.on
ili" *"ii-iide ina u iuirii-oi1 iht-east side. There is no sisn'ificant nesative
impact of the lncreaiel't"ight-upon the adjacent properties and a'letter has
iiEi-""iiiil ;;-iG-;*nI"'6i-o"b hatf of ine dupiex to.the east statins that_
he has no objectiont io ii,.-""tuested variance.'Many other property owners within
fh";;;-htvd atso stateiinaiiney nave no obiection to the variance request'
One of the objectives of the zoning code 'is "to provide for adequate I ight and
air" and another is ito'"n.or"ig. i harmonious convenient workable relationship
i*bng-iind r;aa." ffre-ieieiopmeii itanAards within each zone district are meant
to be a means by which certa.in standards regarding the location and bulk of
UriiJingi iie ""ttiUfished to carry out thes6 obieitives and to promote harntonious
and coordinated deveiJpr"ni-"iir'i-n each area of the Town. The g,ranting of the
ru"ii"i" to enable ihe'.ppiiiiant to u*."ed the allowable height'limitatiorr within
the zone district would constiture the granting of a.special privilege and r'rould
not be consistent with the object.ives of the zone code:
actors:
rtawfrl -2- 2/7 /83
The effect of the re_q-qgslgg rsl_t31l_c_e_an l'!ght and air, distft_bl_Uglpl_pp_ptt-:-.----:..-..---_lation,, tr!_!!po!:!_q!on and traffic facilities, public facili;ies and utilitie3,
ano puD Irc sa ref,y.
No significant impact.
Suc[ other factors and criteria as the commission deems appJ icable to the proposed
varlance.
FINDINGS:
The Planning and Environmental Conrmission shal'l make the fo] lowing findings
before granting a varjance.
l'hat the granting of the variance wi'l 'l not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the Iimitations on other properties classified in the same
d i str ict.
That the grant'ing of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in
the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
The strict or literal interpretat'ion and enforcement of the specified regulation
would result in practica'l difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent
With the objectives of this tit'le.
There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the site of the variance that do not apply general ly to other properties
in the same zone.
The strict or 'litera'l 'interpretat jon and
would deprive the appl icant of privileges
in the sarE district.
STAFF REcOiT4ENDATIONS
The Department of Cornmunity Developrnent recommends denial of the requested variance.
Although the ?.2 foot increase in the roof ridge height does not result in any
s'ignificant impacts upon adjacent properties or the cormunity, any practicai
difficulty or physical hardshjp was created by the app'licant and is not suffjcient
reason to grant a variance.
enforcement of the specified regulation
enjoyed by the owners of other properties
/u^-;-fi
2 5t'
g/4ty
D"o' 77-n 4-/'"2/ t) P#,,^
/ /"* /**4 /-U o l,'* ).-.- tt/J
1/t-za. zZ 4/f -J".2-- / s3 tr
^*.a---U /"^ "''' ' '* Z'"'-'- Z4 /*JZ^
-/ *:/2, // '.-^Z/ /2"-*/ /--^
ztJ/d , 2. /^-"- /"- z?./
// / z'z''u AZ .4-4. /_4*' zJ /"*
" /t -, E o, ,* ,keaz
aaz-'lzr7,4/ 4*- ,4
.y'a a =-e--
44
-n /1 ,.// .///"-**U,-" z' " "
"/// "--,4 /-
,J* JA
-.1^ ^/J 4or-..- 27e
/.-)t2't/2-2/'42 /- a\
' r*d 2-_// 5 r7Z/ ,
'6n.---7r-4f G. 8-ao zo
-
/-'-' lD /qa?
-
./.1
'\r
'ti.1,f r.am K1a.w i l,
:-'i 63i4eadow uy: .
-.J. aoK Z>)
-;: r- Vail r Cc .
lr Iast Vail pe;:-,.i_-nce & prope:,:-- _...rners:
r (l,Iolf .an ilr-aviter ) harre r:.- i.r- a home on the corner of 'j:;niper and' Iuread'ow Dr. r have iaie an error in the f ound.ation
t's:i ch nakes the buir-d.ing 2ft 2in. over the hight restriction
of 33ft. So I an trying to get a r,,ariaace from the town of Vai]-to al-J.or the extra highF
If you d.o I{0T opject to tbe extra height ptEASE sign belov
TAANK YOU.
".44 ,/ 4- .K a-//h-e;r*A/^?Z
\&* 6cr {* Zp /
\
l'ft q4o /4:4 */.g-/ffif7 z,trz,./-1
/t*#z-r tlLfifiilr,<:.nfuV -./Z"r ;' i
44 fu --- i!2, M*a 4rzr'fliZu4u, or- -'''
&z>>r/rr;
(t4 A/ (A [/h;-tt , hL
--f/,/-q 1,o(4. r.,y' ,f / /
F
:
/D,/ 7y3
Wol-fram Klaviter
4768Meactov Dr.
P.0. box 255
East Vai1, Co.
To East Vail Residence & Property Owners:
f (Wolfran Klawiter) have buitd. a hone on the corner of
,;[uniper ancl Meaclov Dr. I have nad.e an error in the founclation
whi.ch makes the builcling 2ft ZLn. over the hright restriction
of 33ft. So I am trying to get a variance from the town of Vai]-
to a]-]-ov the extra highF
If you do NOT o!,Ject to the extra height PLEASE sign belov
THANK YOU.
SincerJ.y
Wo]- fram
? &*ss lo:'^' D3
Fl,ar pe,ss fitc- alv'n<-'y4,ns ilt'l dM( ru'.3h[d" T' h^t' roPralb\t'
l'7
--l .r{f&^*l- 'lf/6 f,un,'7n.- ,t n. aAat< no oileJ);n ,
+rrp fu +7q? Pr"-l'"", h,)u,
9i* \tpzt+,2 4trt2. *,,ro --/a'a'' *, "5 ff ?-*"';i,r..^nQ>-'
l]tl2 fiu-t--rt1-
'
u' *iyzcnu,'- :,Af"W 2zz2+2
--) n/)-t n A ,x - , /) i
!\obi"*ou+ rf. aK*4- L-St,t fts,e a.#*rf
&J rf|-A'r*p"^^,'*X{ lLi' 0i;td7,rL "} 'P,
u'
Uudr: l-!il *ft6w'1il7i A",r /d*_
z&tz,- &rw' / 4?"n w; '{lf*nal>/
r--.- I L-'/ i r 'J- Qa,le.- a-bso/u
a- /@r; 5a/
Cv, €-
).)-..-" /L),/?83
!Jo1f ran Klaviter
l+T6SMeados Dr.
P.0 . box 255
East Vail r Co .
To Xast Vail Residence & Property Ovners:
I (Wolfran Klaviter) have build. a home on the corner of
i[uniper ancl Meatiow Dr. I have mad.e an error in the f oundation
vhlch makes the builcting 2ft 2in. over the hight restriction
of 33ft. so I an ttying to get a variance from the tovn of vail
to allov the extra high.
If you do NOT olject to the extra height PLEASE sign belov
THANK YOU.
ot
c4^
Sincerly
Wolfram
Geeat fu]-
K]-aniter z
2h/
? 0r'.rtg {o =' eS
Wu\L Pr*t fi^o- oin* 'rl'^'A 'o' M*l dtl ru5hL" L h^z ra p'a!tms'
wltL.
,4-2 ,7u,la7:i'-.'i {' 42a4" -2ifi., a,,:()
-=€/U..j' -1/' -tZl -z<-czg
J |to*,- r* {j
DATE
RTilPr-i} rown of vail o o Ne 22148 l9--------.----
RECEIVED FROM
ADDRESS
DOLLARS $
Permit Numbers
HOW PAID-- Cash
-Check -
Bv
Police Receipt Numbers
oa oO
PUBLlC NOTICE
NOTICEISHEREBYGiVENthatthePlanningandEnv.ironmentalCommissionof
theTownofVaj]wi1]holdapublichearingjnaccordancewithSectionlB.66.060
of the municipal code of the Town of Vail on February .l4, 1983 at 3:00 pm in the
council chamb'ers in the Vail munjcipal bui'lding'
Public hearing and consjderatjon of:
l.RequestforaheightvarianceinaccordancewjthChapterlB.62oftheVail
mun.icipal code for a duptex which extends 2 feet z inches above the height
:limit of 33 feet on lot l, block 7, Bighorn 5th Addjtjon'
App'licant: l,lolfram K'lawiter
The applicat.ions and jnformation relatjng to the proposals are available in
thezoningadministrator'sofficeduringregularbusjnesshoursforrevjew
orinsPection bY the Pubf ic.
TOI{N OF VAIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
A. PETER PATTEN, JR, Zoning Administrator
Publjshed in the Vajl Trail January 28' .l983
APPLICATION
This procedure is required
The application will not be
AppJ-i-r:;r ti.on
iloRl\t l'(lii I- VARI1.^rr*Cil
for any ir;'oject i:equesti.ng a \rariance.
acceptr.jd unLil- all i.nfonnation is submiLted.
{2
A.
B.
NAl"JIl OF
ADDRESS
APPLICANT
p PHoNE +)( /rgt)
PHONB
C. AUTHORIZATION OT PROPIJRTY OVJNNR
SIGI{ATURE
ADDRESS
D.
Pp .8o* ?tf )/";l Cu K)/r-g pHoNE Lzl tt So
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
,tl ADDP.ESS 4 76I fl"^/u- O. E^r/ t";/ _
/block Firing B, o/ o, ^ 5t^ ^.il
FtrIt. $100 - 00 pl us an anoLrn't equal to the therr clrrlent f ir:;t-class postage
rate for cac.h property owner to Lie not if icd hereundc:.. .
A list of the nanies of owners cf all property adjaccnt to the
subject property and their addresses,
PoT Dtn"s5 Aro-r, Y y'o,'/,C. 8/|sg
R"lr,t UP"/r.3un ) jS 2 Mtsse,/ tou.t 8,uo,.,d,.il goo2o
fls,K Bryon 3?Ol Ta>z Ar,-c 0,. 0.nrer,t,> gD27l
| +-.J o4 a' / I c >-, t J t o^st 8or 62 6 t/ ^,'l , to I
. 2o?? 1/'rr4 fro^/t1.F, )"/^ n. n.Aomt
Fer',a^/.,
2t Vt.lfl,tun/,ti^
LEGAL DESCRIPT:TOIi lot 2
E.
F.
$to,l7 Lol
Lo f
LoT
Blo"(5
Lat I
tot t7
8to"(L
Lot I
2
?
c
) 6t8
R".J v'.'l
-
4)o /{. o *, --/!/2,^' ;Ie'
TIAME OF APPLICAI{T'S REPP.ESEN'IA.I]1VE
ADDRESS
n1 ,:&"1 rl,tl t)
froy,.l,., Brx 389I l'/")/ f'1" 8tlf g
r'' 8|(r7
alrplicatiorr ror*$ v;rriance page 2
."<1
TI. .Fottr {4) copies of the following information:
A. A statement of the precise nature of the variance requested,the regulation involved, and the practj-cal diffi.culty or unnnecessary physical hardship inconsistent wj-th the objecti\/es of this Litle that would resuft from strict or literal inter:pretatj-on and enforce-rnent of the specified regulat.ion.
B. A site plan showing all existing and proposed features on the site, and on adjoining sites if necessary, pbrtinent to the variance requested, incruding site boundaries. required setbacks, building locations and heJghts. topography and physical features and similar data.
c. such additional material as Lhe zoning administrator may pre-scribe or the applicant may submit pertinent to the applic.tion.
IfI. Time requirements
. The Planning and Environmental commission meets on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. An application with the necessary accom-panying materiar must be sr.rbmitted four weeks prior to the hate of the meeting.
II.
.}?"
/0,/7s2
Hight Zoning Restriction
Maximum high alloves for 33ft building elevation fron existing
gracle or f inishecl grade (vhichever is more restrictive ) t'o top
of riclge. Town0rcLinence Section 18. Ol|.170 & section 18.12.080
I roulcl like to request a variance of an extra 2ft 2Ln in
high be granted so 1 can conplete the builcling.
Builrting is presently constructed. antl is 2ft 2in over previous
gracle, Anerror .14'as madsbetrreen the existing grade, the foundation
and the top of riitge. It voulal be inposible to Lover the founation
and cutting off the top gable r,rould cleteriorate from the looks
of the builcling and- would. involve alot of work antl expence.
il4-"2"J
A.
t
II.
| % /ctrr3
Blgbt Zoa!,ng Brrtrlotlon
ldrrlnun hlgb rllovet for 33ft bulkllng clcvrtlou fror rrlrttlg
gFrrlc or f,lnlrbo& grtdc (rblabrvor ir norc rcrtrlotlvc) to top
o! rtilgc. lovnorillnrnor Ecctlon 18.0I .1?o & rcotlon fE.IA.O80
I vould lllo to rrquort a vrrlraol of, rn utra Q,.tt 2tn ln
bleb bo gr"utril to I oen corgt.rtc tbc bullillng.
BulLdlng 1r prctoatly conrtruatc{ rnil 11 2ft 2ln ovtr prevlour
6reib. Aarrror uor lril bttrrrn thc crtrtlag grrCr, tb. founilrtlon
lnil tbe top of rldgr. It vould br lagotlble to loror tb. founrtloD
rnrt sutting off thr top grblc roulit dctrrlorato lron tbc looh
ot tbc Dullillng etrC nould lavolvr elot of rort, tail !rl,tno..
il-(*^4
A.
b-.- /o,/2"y3
Wolfram Kl awit e r
l+T6Bueaaov Dr.
P.O. box 255
East Vai1, Co.
To East Vail Residence & Property Ovners:
I (I^Iolfram Kfaviter) have buil-tt a home on the corner of
,Juniper and Meadow Dr ' r have mad.e an error in the foundation
which makes the building 2ft 2in, over the hight restriction
of 33ft. so I am trying to get a variance from the town of Vai-l
to a1lov the extra highF
If you tto NOT opject to the extra height PLEASE sign belov
THANK YOU.
ein^avlrr vrrrvLrfJ
VIo 1f r arn
h/tfz'-''"'-'
Geeatful
Klasiter z ?cJ
? &*ss tos^^'e.
W*L pz.ss fi^c- oXt* '*y{'us nrr'l dr( /i/[htd" T'h^a rop'oltrns^
)'i
. J *{{.'{L=J"'/1/6 T,'^,/"- Ln
,
4t t -J A1i< 'ro Ol.rlge/1c t1 .
2v'e,-
ltli
or |'t
75 soulh fronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
February 7, 1983
l.^Iolfram Klawiter
P.0. Box 255
Vai1, Co'lorado 81658
Dear Mr. Klawiter:
RE: DRB Submittal of 2-2-83
This letter is to inform you that at their February 2, 1983 meet'i ng
the Town of Vail Design Review Board voted 5-1 to deny your app'l icat'ion
to modify your roof. The DRB stated that the application was not jn
compliance with Section 18.54.070 of the Town of Vail Mun'ic'ipa1 Code.
Section 18.54.0708 states that "structures should not visually dominate
the townscape or call undue attention to themsel ves unless they are of civic importance and occupy focal sjtes."
PJ:df
O D ero;""t Application O O
t/ j
,,/ ztt tn , / {,.
[),,,, /. ,
/.L./ir^n".Proiect Name:
Project Description:
,a,.) " ,,/" ,.. ,1., / , ^ l. -Contact Person and Phone
42/g 4...1^, /). ,t.,/ tL.,Owner. Address and Phone:
il, '"'/f ,,,-)(/on,f".tz t'&1( Er-)Architect. Address and Phone:
, 'rr,iJ
Legal Description: Lot
Comments:
Filing Zone
-
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Design Review Board
APPFOVAL
---a-.' \,-I ( orsnppRovel ./---__/t-
Qr,
SZr ftot(l
o I
d
I
;1.{
proj.ctName: 4"/{'"-' /(/o""/'- lu"ro/"'
proj€ctD€scripl,on' 47 At ,y'/o..y',"-' o" E '' t l/..'/
Prolect Application
Owner Address and Phone:'L/ ./-\ C "' "<)) f /O-/<{AL/
/,/, ,'/ f o/, Kr 4 f r
Architect Address and Phone:
L6gal Description:Lot / ,glock 2 ,rfing Btt/o'^ -<d olJ
Zoning Approv€cl:
Deslgn Revlew Board
Dato
)
.a
.,t ';{:'.1 ,:
fr I 'I
l
I
I
I
I
Motion by:
S€condod by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
4*lAbE H. Et--EJAroA 'tv 4aAHlG
Dcn,fz- '
Summary:
.l
.{oi
' t
h) olfr" -, '--K/ o -'' t"
.' LFuY /4e^1,- D"
a:!V't:l(eX,/l
E. 'l y'^i /
0 o, tz' Pr "il t33
l"(v
5'>'
'.ri l'A-l*ral, .
A ft'
=s'/i
,I tl
?
%
fi lD.-:! [LEV =t3:'. d'
;- J- -
t., 6'- _1..i ,
,i i{ !, ..,,^,'.' t-i -J r,
itI .:
l tuUt rL
/ "'"h*n
'{W
ir"'o
hf.Pto
,rrnf
FIYDftO-Ti1li,*, [-TD.
June 1, 1982 e73-eg--o
l4r . l,io I f ram Kl arv i te r
vost utT l ce box rf,5
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear l4r. Klawiter:
At your request, we have examjned the revised location for
your residence to be constructed on Lot 1, Block 2, Bighorn Sub-
division,Sth addition. l,le have the folloling comments pertaining
to the potent'i al avalanche impact on this structure
1. The house itself will be located entire'ly within the
moderate hazard zone, for the MC Avalanche Runout Zone,
in Vail, Colorado. The hazards associated with this zone
are fully defined in the KAC Avalanche Study prepared by
Hydro-Triad, Ltd. in 1975
The western rvall of the retaining wal1 patio to the south-
west of the building is located slightly within the high
hazard zone. Sjnce the wall will function partially as
protection for the remainder of the house, we assume that it has been desjgned to withstand the avalanche forces.
The probable impact pressure on an unprotected uphill face
of the residence wou'ld be approximately 250 pounds per
square foot. This pressure'i s nitigated somer.rhat by
the protection of the retaining wall and the orientation
of the uph'i11 walls. The probable impact pressure associated
with the wall's orientation should be incorporated in the
structural design for that wa'l l.
are glad to have been of service.
contact us.
If you have any questions,
Si ncerely,
2.
pl ease
R Jr.
///'?z'A
Dtr
- -.HYqR0-TRrAD, LTD,
,' ) /,,..//l
->'.<-0 v, yr t,4'
Ronald L. ltal'ley,
Pres i dent
'1 26t'lWt sr ctDAt?DRtVt sr.riI[ 10t)LAK[\/OOt), (:or,oRADO B0?28 Pl-loNt 303-989-1264
box 10O
vail, colorado 81657
{3031 476-5613
October 5, 1981
}lolfram Klawiter.
P.0. Box 225
Vai'1, Colorado 81657
PJ:df
department of community development
RE: DRB Submitta'l of 9-30-81
Dear blolfram:
At the September 30 meeting of the Design Review Board, your
submittal for'a primary/secondary residence was given..final
.
approval with thb folloving stipulations: examine N.l'1. roof
lihe for possib'le revisions, prior to build'ing permit letter
needed to verify ava'lanche protection, roof to be shake shingles'
use topsoil on aisturbed areas before seeding- fpproval-qgs for a primary/secondary residence with a total GRFA 6f 4020 sq.ft':
2866 sq.ft. primary and 1154 sq.ft. secondary.
.),.-'/l
PeteY
Town P
Jamar
'l anner
Pro.iect Name:
Project Application
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Descriplion: Lot Block Filing , Zone
-
Com ments:
Design Review Board
DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
lrrt./n U, i:t',' i i"\(:i'.4,:; y'/_,."' ,',
n ,' ,-' ;:' /1 t' ' :t (,7-,/
'd/f ,,t'
.tl/,fiI,r,* 7,,
,. t,,
,.-ii','itll
... ,"i. i r, ' ( '.n--.. ', ..-
-
ToWn Planher
' ../ i .!,'
E statt Approval
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(3031 476-5613
September 22 ' I98L
Illolfram Klawitei
P.0. 8ox 255
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear l,lolfram:
Peter Jamar
Town Pl anner
PJ:df
department of community development
DRB Submittal of 9-16-81
Lot 1, Blk.7' BH 5th
At the September 16 meeting of the Design Review Board" your
submittal for a primary,/secondary residence was tabled with
the following stipulations: receive engineerrs approval on
avalanche haiard mirtigati,on, attempt to have one driveway access'
'look at a'lternative rbf material, eliminate extra fireplaces'
submit a model of house, more'i nformation on materials, more work
on landscaping. (',
d^"-
\--}
Project Application (
.it
Proiect Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone: ,,. .'t , ^.-, .4 "" -. ,/,-,. i',,.:. Eu* ) 5':- l/u i
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block 7 ,r,t,ng ,,..,-/ .n 4'a^.11,/.7sn.
Com menls:
Design Review Board
o^," .l', 7/',, ,, t /
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Tft'la 4' 4//zirW-
Summary:/lL
4<lw177,/?-//ntA 6/,
't
tOU? 4, O///,6a/Pg4flA/6
rh477€//tr
E Start Approval
7_0t'lE cilt,cK
sFR,
for
P/S ZONE DISTRICTS R, R
Lesal Description: L& f sloru a-Fil ins
o*.*" Wd-te4m fi-ft.rltz4Architcct
Zone Distri rt - R ?/S proposcd Use R. f,
Proposed
Sides-Requirecl l5' proposed
Rear -Required l5' proposed
. t,laterccurse-required
---_
proposed
GRFA:
GRFA:
Propo:cc 'loqP * f
-Al l oued
i'rinar3, Arlor.reo - HWdASt Prinrrry Propcsed leQg
Secondary Altor'red /7hf Secondar5, proposed _flfr
Site Ccveragc: A'l'loived ____A9_%__aR
Landscaping:
Parl<ing:
Drive: Slope permitled __ Sloi>e Actual
Environ:tii:rtta'1,/i!.-rzards: Ava'lancfie
Fiood Plain
Cor'nterrts :
Required
-_A*_- : proposecl
Required
---A
Si ope
70:t inrt l).i t i::
a a
q7{0
/^1/q (at If
-.
tNGI l'l[[R ] lic Clll:CK l-i ST
Etr^ir,e^'Subdivision
Lot
B'lock
Filing .grH
1. Submittal Items
(A) Topo l'1ap
(B) Siie Plan (c) Util'ity Plan
( D) Ti tl e lteport
(E) Subdiv'ision Agreement
2. Engineerjng Requirements
(Acceptable) (ltot Acccptable)
t./
- ,'-"
(if appljcable)
, ^tl (A) Culvert Size l.Q. '
(s) ori ver.ray Grade-l8E-fiEli-mcTuaI)
=3. Source of U';i'l ities
(A
(B
(c
(o
{F
(F
El ectri c
Gas
Sei.lel
l^la ter
Tel ephorie
T.V.
A Conrnent:;:
>7,
Approved;
Di sapproved:
4an<11:' BtO<atq4
;c,st 22, l10L
F
DApErTncliT o?
Bill Arrd:'cr*s
(
I
I
I
I
I
tur
lo
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
t(J
It-
to t(J tz r6
r5
;:!:{
=-ib;-a-"i :i:;:
.,, Il.:
";:ii :<32:azl=-:iF::;
a,J. z=ri:ii
:<v <!!=ii lF" tc 3> -3 <: it a-=<:<t-:
d
F
F I
z
G
F
=J
lcill
31 9ll -
F(l az d p.?i r?F oz:r^(r-4=<HEEH pSHba
o (J-z<)
oct zz
kga HA f iE,nj € iEE iio:FIFX S i oZ :<
cc o 3 ZZtt-ra a1 ()
F ^ 6z q 5 >e E I of,
thoG Z!(J Po n i* o og i P;icr i6 g
-<\t(,
NOIVn]YA
ci z.
t
tu (L
z
F o t!_-t
o E
u.r F
o
d
C,
C
u.l
\{,
i|q \l '\\"t^,l\;
:t a .il\\l al .^--\ I w:.- )t l1l \I;t_-
| (l la l''
!l :,'
\
\
a
\
\l $(
sd
(t z
J
t!
:<
tr!
6
*
J z o
z._o l) :-zz
ccO >z
O. LL
ufrr_rl >l
"ff| "3i bl
=Fl:fl;3i 'hr
ti
qt
E
o
':
l
E
E o
-.'. o
c
::o_;;.,)
- -- _(f
t
E
E,
lrJ (L z o
F (J
E F a z o O o o
ca c t
(4.
l-
rx il <.1 ll
VF]IH
--i:l I ;
: :- | F-oi ,io u) ;. i:
CT (,o Zr-
o-O
)fY <()OF
a. <)
Lrl r-J
cr JO .{ l"'cr a)
t! -(
ul l _
a)
F
trl
F
:r:
O
a:
LrJ
7 (t
o
.r: ()
li! ri
s \\\
^-$
I o
\l ll \l \l
I \l ql \l
I
^.'l \l \l
I
I V,U\
a
<l
-,|
t:l
\r,
{\
I \
\
\
\i
lt l tl tl
,.1 "tl q"tl !:l \ "^l l-l
1d aFl tc{l<l
c.l .:i
\\s
I
{\
PoLrcYNo. z 367?44
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY
Secretary
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy:
L Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances)
restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the chamcter,
dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in
ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law,
ordinance or governmental regulation.
2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights
appears in the public records at Date of Policy.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the
insured claimant;(b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured
claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy
and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant
became an insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created
subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulthg in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured
claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy.
I
A FoRMB- 1e70
^/ \ ,rtte ruSURANCE OMpANy OF ,Tj |NNESOTA
fl
ft 11 trLE NSURANCE r,OrupnruV OF iy|INNESOTA
Authorized Officer or Agent
a
L
atilb Form 121 6/71 1OM
Vtr' Copyright 1969 American Laod Title Association
a Stock Company, of Minneapolis. Minnesota
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCTIEDI.JLE B AND
THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPTJLATIONS HEREOF,
TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in
Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A, and costs, attomeys'fees
and expenses which the Company may become obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incuned by the insured by reason of:
1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated therein;
2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such titlel
3. lack of a right of access to and from the land; or
4. Unmarketability of such title.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Title Insurance Company of Minnesota has caused its corporate name and seal to
be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers as of the date shown in Schedule A, the poliry to be valid when
countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company.
President
J
(do[ )frry aptut uo panmtuo1)
^llrqerr ll' farnsur qcns ol sE ueql '^r"f .qr ol, uear8 eq rou
Ilaqs eJllou tduroJd qcns JI 'elqala)treu.tuF-sE palJefer $ 'peJnsur
se 'tseretu! ro ot€lse aql ol €llll JI ([l) ro ',t tod slll Jo onu!fq olqgll eq ,{etu dueduroJ aql qcrqn roJ etsruBp Jo ssol osnBc
1q3!ur qc!q^\ pu? 'pomsul s€ rlserelu! ro alelse eql ot etul oqt ol
osJe^pE sr grrq^\ lsajalul ro allrl Jo ru!?lt duE Jo rapuneJeq peJnsu!
se ol otuoJ ltBqs a8pel^roul aseJ ur (!l) 'e oqe (?) u! rIlJoJ l.s se
pesodrelq sr esu.Jap ro unSeq sl iupaeJoJd Jo uollce
^uE
asec u! (r)
Sullu r u! ,lltdruord ,(uBduroJ erll IJllou lFrts p€rnsur aqJ (q)
'^JIIod srql ,(q lsulDEs parnsu rallEu.r roqlo ro'aJuerqtuntue
'uaq 'lJeJep pe8alle ue uodn papunoJ s! uolleSlM qtns leql
lualxa aql ol 'puel pres ur IsaJalu Jo alslse eql Jo ales e roJ Itsrluor € €croJua ol uorlt€ ue ur pernsur u9 lsuleS€ pasodlalq osuoJap
a ro 'pornsur qcns tsulEBE pecuaururoc s8ulpearoJd ro suollf,B Jo
turlsrsuoJ uorleSrlll ltE ur pernsur ua Jo asueJep aql roJ epl^oJd ll?rts
'dElap enpun Inoqll,vr pue lsoJ u^{o sl! ts 'dueduroJ aql (?)
lueu|lelC parnsul u? Aq uo,\l6
aq ot urlelc lo aclloN * suoll3v lo uollnrasord pue asualao '8
'paJnsut qans ol ue,\r€ o3?3 oru deuour esEqcrnd E,(q pernJas ssaupalqepul eql ro lseJolur ro elElsa plEs raqlre
Jo pernsu! qcns r$orJ rasEqctnd ,{uE Jo ro^EJ ul ocroJ ul anul}uoJ
tou lleqs {Jrlod slql 'ta^e^aoq 'papl^ojd :lseJelut .ro elelsa qJns
Jo oJupie,\uoJ ro ralsusrl fuB ur pdrnsur qcns iq ep€tu ,{luellea Jo
slueua^oJ Jo uosear fq
^lllqelt e^eq lleqs parnsu! qcns sB tuol os ro .parnsu! qJns tuoJJ JaserlcJnd " ,{q ua !3 siE8uolu ,(euou es?qcJnd
B ,{q perncas sseupalqopu! ue sploq ro 'puel eql q lseldlrr! Jo
alelse u€ surelar parnsur qJns sp Suol os peJnsur ue Jo lo]\€J u! icllod
Jo alsc Jo se aJroJ ul anurluoJ II?qs dcllod slql Jo e8era,\oJ aql
alul lo aJus^e^uoc raue aJuelnsul lo uollEnutluoc .z
'o.r"rfor r,ro",er sralle,., Jo ""11o,, "i11r.,r1"uol l.r€dut! ^{€l ,{q qJrq^\ spro]er osoql :..splo?er cllqnd,, (J)
'lue(unrlsur lluncts
reqlo re'poep lsnrl'lsnrl Jo peap 'o3eSlJoru :,,o8e3lrou,, (a)
.,(crlod s!q!
Iq peJnsu! s! puel eql urojJ pu€ ol ssecce Jo lq8u e r{Jrq^ ot lualxe
aqt lrull ro ,$rporu eqs ureJeq Surqlou Inq 'sdE,^{Jele^{ ro s,{8,tr
'ssuel's^elle'senuo^e'spror'slooJls Sull]nqe u! lueuoseo ro elElse
'tseralul'allrl'lq8rr ,{ue rou'v elnpaqrs u! ol paJJeJer ro peqrrcsap
Ilpcur.eds sale or{l Jo seull aql puolaq ,{ odoJd ,{uE apolJu! lou
saop .,pusl,, urral .ql'Je^o^roq 'pepr^ord :Iuedord IBar aln+rlsuoJ
lr|el ,{q qJ!q-{ ola..aq} poxlJJB sluoule^ordlur pue 'V etnpaq?S
ur aJua..aJaJ,{q Jo dlleculJads 'poqrrJsap puBI eql :.,pu€t,, (p)
'sp.roJJJ crlqnd IUE Jo
uosee.r fq pernsu ue 01 palndlur eq
^eur
qJrqa ejllou Jo e8pal^ ou)l
a llrnrlsuoJ lou 'a8pet^ioul Ientre :,,e8pel^\ou{,, (J)
'lepunet0q
r8€uep ro ssol 3ulrlllett patnsur ue i,.lugul!€lJ pelnsu!,, (q)
'sJossor?ns ,fuPrrnprJ Jo elsJod.roJ ro 'uD[ Jo lxeu's3^ll€luasoJdaJ
leuos.rad 'sro^[ rns 'soeswp 'saelnqlr]srp 'srreq 'ol palluq
lou lflq '3ulpnlcq esEqrrnd tuorJ par{srnSqlslp se A{el Jo uorl?rado
dq parnsul qcns Jo lsaJolur oql ol paercns oq^{ esoql 'pernsur psurgu
eql lsulegs peq a €q ,{Bru iueduroC aql sosuaJap Jo slqSll ,tus ol
lcafqns'pu?'r{ elnpoqcs u! peureu pgrnsu. .ql :,.pernsu!,, (e)
:ueeu ,{r!lod slql q pesn uaq^{ sulrol 8ur \olloJ eql
surrsl lo uolllultao 'l
SNOIIV'INdIIS CNY sNottIoNo)
.l, TIM Ownors Form 2312
-v
Fif e No. GV-1320 Poticy No. Z 367244
Amount$ 9'500.00
SCHEDULE A
1 Policy Date Apt^il 3, 1973 at 8:00 A.M.
2. Name of Insured:
REINER ttl. KLAWITER and Id0LFRAM G. KLAWITER
3. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is:
A FEE
4. Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at t}re date hereof is vested in:
REINER t{. KLAWITER and I^J0LFRAM G. KLAWITER, in Joint Tenancy
5. The land referrqd qo in this policy is situated in the County og Eagle
State of COlOfadO and is described as follows:
LOT I, BL0CK 7, BIGHORN SUBDIVISION FIFTH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, County of Eag1e, State of Colorado.
4.This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached.
TIM OWNERS 2'3 FORM 23t3
File No. GV-l 320
SCHEDULE B
Poricy No. Z 367244
This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following:
I . Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and
inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown
by the public records.
5. General or special taxes and assessments required to be paid in the year lg73
and subsequent years.
Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any.
Restrictive covenants, which do not contain a forfeiture or reverter clause, as
contained in instrument recorded November 25, 1966 in Book175 at Page 445.
Twenty (20) foot easement along the Westerly lot 'line as shown on the p1at.
Five (5) foot ut'i lity easement along all interior lot lines as reserved on the
pl at.
Reservation contained in Patent from the un'ited states as fol lows: subject to the right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises
hereby granted; and there is reserved from the lands hereby granted right of
way thereof for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States.
Deed of Trust dated March 1, 1973, from REINER t^J. KLAWITER and hI0LFRAM G. KLAbJITER to the Public Trustee of Eagle County for the use of J0HN A. C0ZZINI and ARLENE
cOzzINI to secure the sum of $7,600.00 recorded April 2,1973, in Book 228 at page
445.
6.
7.
8.
9.
.|0.
't't.
A
(Continued from inside front flop)
of the Company shall ceas€ and terminate in regard to the matter or
matters for which such prompt notice is required; provided, how-
ever, that failure to notify shall in no cas€ preiudice the rights of
any such insured under this policy unless the Company shall be
prejudiced by such failui€ and then only to the exlent of such
prejudice,
(c) The Company shall have the right at its own cost to
instilute and without undue delay prosecute any action or
proceeding or to do any other act which in its opinion may be
necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or inte.est
as insu.ed, and the Company may take any appropriale action under
the terms of this policy, whether or not il shall be liable thereunder,
and shall not thereby concede liabilily or waive any provision of this
policy.
(d) Whenever the Company shall have brought any action or
interposed a defense as requiled or permitted by the provisions of
this policy, the Company may pursue any such litigation to final
determination by a court of competent jurisdiclion and expressly
reserves lhe right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from any adverse
judgmenl or order.
(e) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the
Company to prosecute or provide fol the defense of any action or
proceeding, the insured heteund€r shall secure to the Company the
right to so prosecute or provide defense in such aclion or
proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use,
at its option, the name of such insured for such purpose. Whene\€r
requested by lhe Company, such insured shall give the Company all
.easonable aid ifi any such actiot or proceeding, in effecting
settlement, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, or prosecuting or
defending such action or proceeding, and the Company shall
reimbulse such insured for any expense so incurred.
4. Notice of Loss - Limitation of Action
ln addition to the notices required under paragraph 3(b) of these
Conditions and Stipulations, a statement in writing of any loss or
damage for which it is claimed the Company is liable under lhis
policy shall be furnished to the Company within 90 days aftet such
loss or damage shall have been delermined and no right of action
shall accrue to an iflsured claimant until 30 days afler such
statemenl shall have been furnished. Failure to furnish such
statement of loss or damage shall terminate any liability of the
Company under this policy as to such loss or damage.
5. Options to Pay or Otherwis€ Settle Claims
The Compafly shall have the option to pay or otherwise settle
for or in the name of an insured claimant any claim insured against
or to terminate all liability add obligalions of the Company
hereunder by paying or tendering payment of lhe amount of
instJranc€ under this policy togethet with any costs, attorneys'fees
and expenses incurred up to the time of such payment or tender of
payment, by the insured claimanl and authotized by the Company.
6. Delermination and Payment of Loss
(a) The liability of the Company under this policy shall in no
case exceed the least of:
(i) the actual loss of the insured claimant; or
(ii) the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A;or
(iii) the actual value of the estate or interest of the
insured claimant in the land described in Schedule A at the time the
loss or damage insur€d against hereunder occurs undiminished by
the defect, lien, encumbrance, or other matter insured against by
this policy.
(b) The Company will pay, in addition to any loss insured
against by this policy, all costs imposed upon an insured in litigation
ca.ried on by the Company for such iflsured, and all costs,
altorneys' fees and expenses in litigation caraied on by such insured
with the written authorization of the Company,
(c) wl|en liability has been definilely fixed ir accordance
with the conditiofls of this policy, the loss or damagg shall be
payable within 30 days thereafte..
7. Limitation of Liabilitv
No claim shall a.ise or b€ maintainable under this policy (a) if
the Company, after having received notice of an alleged defect,lien
or encumbrance insured against hereunder, by litigation or
otherwise, removes such defect, lien or encumbrance or establishes
ihe title, as insured, within a reasonable iime after receipt of such
notice; (b) in the event of litigation until there has be€n a final
determination by a court of competent iurisdiction, and disposition
of all appeals lherefrom, adverse to the title, as insured, as provided
in palagraph 3 hereof; or (c) for liability voluntarily assumed by an
insured in settting any claim o! suit without prior written consent of
the Company.
8. Reduqtion of Liability
All payments under this policy, except payments rnade for costs,
attorneys' fees and expenses, shatl reduce the amount of the
insuralce pio tanto. No payment shall be made without producing
this policy for €ndorsement of such payment unless the policy be
lost or deslroyed, in which case proof of such loss or destruction
shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company.
9. Liability Noncumulativ€
It is expressly understood that the amount of insurance uirder
this policy shall be reduced by any amount the Company may pay
under any policy insuting either (a) a mortgage shown or refered to
in Schedule B hereof which is a lien on the eslate or interest covered
by this policy, o. (b) a mortgage hereafter executed by an insured
\r.hich is a charge or lien on the estate or interest described or
referred to in Schedule A, and the amount so paid shall be deemed a
payment under this policy. The Company shall har/e the option to
apply to the payment of any such mortgages any amount that
otherwise would be payable hereundet to the insured owner of the
estale or interest covered by this policy and the amounl so paid
shall be deemed a payment under this policy to said insured ownet.
1O. Apportionrnent
If the land described in Schedule A consists of two or mote
pa.cels which aie not used as a single site, and a loss is established
affecting one or more of said parcels but not aU, the loss shall be
computed and settled on a pro rata basis as if the amount of
insurance under this policy was di\rided pro rata as to the value on
Date of Policy of each separate parcel to the whole, exclusive of any
improvements made subsequeqt to Date of Policy, unless a liability
or value has otherwise been agreed upon as to each such parcel by
the Company and the insured at the time of the issuance of lhis
policy and shown by an express statement herein or by an
endorsement attached hereto.
11, Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement
wtenever the Company shall ha\€ settled a claim under this
policy, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected
by any act of the insured claimant. The Company shall be
subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which such
insured claimant would have had against any person or propefly in
respect to such claim had this policy not been issued, and if
requested by the Company, such insured claimant shall transfer to
the Company all rights and remedies agaiost any person or property
necessary in order to perfect such right of subrogation and shall
permit the Company to use the name of such insured claimanl in
any iransaction or litigation involving such rights or remedies. If the
payinenl does not covea the loss of such insured claimant, the
Company shall be subrogated to such rights and remedies in the
proportion which said payment bears to the amount of said loss. lf
loss should result from any act of such insured claimant, such act
shall not void this policy, but the Company, in that event, shall be
required to pay only that part of any losses insured against
hereunder which shall exceed the amount, if any, lost to the
Company by reason of the impairment of the right of subrogation,
12, Liability Limited ro this Policy
This instlumeot together with all endorsements and other
instruments, if any, attached hereio by the Company i8 the entire
policy and contract between the insured and the Company.
Any claim of loss or damage, whelher or not based on
negligence, and which a.ises out of the status of the title to the
estate or inlerest covered hereby or any actiol a$erting such claim,
shall be restricted to the proyisions and conditions and stipulations
of lhis policy.
No amendment of o. endors€ment to this policy dan be made
except by writing endorsed hereon o. attached hereto signed by
either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant
Sec.etary, or validating officer o. authorized signatory of the
Company.
13. Notices, Whore Sent
All notices required to be given the Company and any statement
in writing required to be furnished the Company shall be addressed
to its Home Office, Minneapolis, Minnesola 55401.
Note: This policy valid only if Schedules A and B are attached.
lrlu.d ih.ough lh. olllce of:
TITLE INSURANGE POLIGY
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY
FORM B - 1970
GI|RE YATLEY IITIE, I]IC.
VAIL, COLORADO 81557
Phone:338-5947 AC 303
['.,
:' ri!i-
'"i
.'
ITLE .NSURANCE ,
1
q a
PUBLIC NOTICE
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a recently pre-
pared avalanche report indicates the following described
properties are located in a major avalanche path and struc-
tures nay be subject to destruction:
Bighorn Townhouses located on Tracts A and B,
Bighorn Townhouse Subdivision; Tracts C and D,
Bighorn Townhouse SubCivision, Section 12, Town-
ship 5 South, Range 80 West, of the 6th Principal
Meridian, Town of Va11, County of Eagle, Colorado.
A portlon of Lot 2, Block 7, Bj-ghorn Fifth
Addition
I(ing Artb.ur's Court - A portion of the property
more fully described as follows:r,9 rLa,t-J-J
A'parce'l of 'land situated in the SE 'tl! of. Section '12,- T5S, RBOI{ of the 6th P.l'1.
lagle County, Coioraclo Inore parti cul arly descrj bcd as fo'l'lotvs:
Beginning ar a point on the south lllg gl.said sect'ion -12, whence lt''l lqt Southeas t
loirrg. oi said Sectlon 12 bears S 89o53'24' 8,532.00 feet said point-bein coiner of said Sectlon 12 bears S 89'53'24" E,532.00 feet sa'ld polnt-Delng
;;,il;; witt' o parcel conveyed to JACK A. llITKill and recorded in Book 2.11, Page
520 Eag'le CountY records;
Thence N 89o53'24" l{, 335.25 feet to a point on the l{ortlier]y 'l'ine.of
Lane said point being-cn tlre arc of a cui^ve to the left haVing a radius
feet and a'chord beaiing I'l 74o48'48" l'1, 96.260 feet;
,)uni per
of 185.00
Tlrence on the arc of said curve 97.38 feet to the P.T. (Point
to the P.T.;
on the Northerly
of TangencY);
'line of Meadow Drjvei
of said }litkin Parce'l
Thence N 89o53'24" ll, 16'1.6.| feet to a point on tlte East line of Uqqdp! Drive, s.aid
poini-Uelns on the aic of a cirrve to thb lcft having a radius of l08.l0 feet and
ivhose long-chord bears :N 30"55''23r' l,l, I11.46 feet;
Thence on the arc of said curve l17.l0 feet
Tlrence N 62o04'00".1.1, 248.64 fcet to a point
Thence N 27o56r{)0" E,482.'10'to a point on the Southerly line
Tlrence S 88"07t38" E, 49.B3
Tlicnce S 68'.15127" 8,274.54
Thcnce S 43"58r05" 1-, l7B.BB
Tlrence S l9o5i r 52'r E'' 195.00
Thcnce S 09'02r44" t, 203.85
The.nce S 67"26 | 02" E, '1e3.29
fonf.
feet to the polnt of beginning'' County r
feet;
f ool'.
fee t;
feet;
Eagle, Statc feet
Copies
of
of Colorado.
with the Department of Community Development, Nlunicipal
Building, Vai1, Colorado.
DEPARTMENT OF COIINUNITY DEVELOPNIBNT
Diana S. Toughill
Zoning Administrator