HomeMy WebLinkAboutBIGHORN TERRACE UNIT 20 LEGAL.pdfPlanning and Environmental Commission
BuhornT.rra co trni*&
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Oolorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 tax: 970.479.2452
web: www,ci.vail.co.us
ProiectName: FOWLERVARIANCE PECNumber: PEC050089
Proiect Description:
Side setback variances of seven feet (7') and twenty feet (20') to allow for an entryway
enclosure at the south side ofthe residence; three conditions attached to approval.
Participants:
OWNER FOWLER, THOMAS W., JR LT/TIIaOO5
VIRGINIA A. FOWLER LMNG TRUST
2074 ALBION ST
DENVER
co 80207
APPUCANT FOWLER, THOMAS W., JR ITILLIaOOS
VIRGINIA A. FOWLER LIVING TRUST
2074 ALBION ST
DENVER
co 80207
PrcjectAddresi 4247 COLUMBINE DR VAIL Location:
4247 COLUMBINE DR UNIT 20
Legal Description: Lot: Blodc Subdivisionl BIGHORN TERMCE
Parcel Numbert 2L0L-L22-L402-0
Comments: see conditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Kjesbo Action: APPROVED
Second By: Jewitt
Vote: 6-0-0 Dateof Approvaa. LZltA2005
Conditions:
Cond:8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 300
PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of
approval.
Cond: CON0007765
Prior to the issuance of a building permil the applicant shall obtain from the
Public Works Department a revocable right-of-way permit for the parking that will
remain within the Town's right-of-way.
Entry: L21t42005 By: ee Action: AP
Cond: CON0007766
Prior to issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy by the Community
Development Depaftment, the applicant shall receive approval of a revised plat for
Lots 19 and 20, which delineates a property line congruent with the existing party
wall.
Cond: CON0007757
The approval ofthis variance request shall be contingent upon the applicant
receiving Town of Vail approval of the related design review application.
Elisabeth Eckel PEC Fee Paid: $500.00
llf
'T0ll,A,m
Qo il',
$6s0
$400
Application for Review by the
General Information:
All projects requiring Planning and Environmental Commission review must receive approval prior to submitting a
building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested.
An application for Planning and Environmental Commission review cannot be accepted unul all required information
is received by the Community Development Oepartment. The poect may also need to be reviewed by the Town
Council and/or the Design Review Board.
Type of Application and Fee:
! Rezoning $1300 tr Major Subdivision $1500 n Minor SuMivision $650 ! Exemption Plat $650 tr Minor Amendment to an SDD $1000 tr New Special Development District $6000 n Major Amendment to an SDD $6000 D Major Amendment to an SDD $1250
(no exterior m od ifi ca tio ns)
Descripti-on the Request:
Location of the Proposal
Physical Address:
Name(s) of Owner(s):/
ing Address; 2,
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Applicant:
Mailjeg Address:
. /,4,4.//l
tr Conditional Use Permit tr FloodplainModification
Phone:
l/tFax
,rry,
)Efr
Parcer No.: z/d77777// A,.d
fi tr Minor Frterior Alteration $650 tr Major Exterior Alteration $800 tr Development Plan $1500 I -. flmendment to a Development Plan $250
"fr,li.::.:*" Amendment ll33t
-tr Sign Variance $200 a ,-.
'=4For*/.,*Ol'o''{ tt .9 -g
(Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
CIl -o
For Office Use Onlv: -zr i
ii"r'i.11;.;F"' p T't:#L ?i. *
Page I of 6-01/ l8/02
***+**+*****+**********************t,1.*++***+************+******+****i***t**{r***ll+***++{.*:t **
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statement
++++*+**********+*{.:t +****++**f ****+*****+++**++ * * * *,}**** *****+**********+**{.*+++***{.+t***1.+*
statement Number: Ro5Ooo1939 Anount: $500.00 L]-/lt/2oo5t1 :12 AM
Palment Method: Check
FOWIJER
Init: JS
NOtAtiON: 128IVIRGINIA
Permit No: P8C050089 Type:
Parcel No: 2707-722-!4O2-O
Site Address: 4247 COITIIMBINE DR VAIL
L,ocation: 424? COITUI4BINE DR t NIT
This Payment: $500.00
PEC - Variance
20
Totsa1 Fees 3
TotsaI AI,I.. PmgE r
Balance :
$500.00
$s00, oo
$0.00
* ** * t + * * * *f**********+i****1.*!****t+{. * * * * * * * * * * *************+**********************{t*+{.+++{.*
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Current Pmta
PV 00100003LL2500 PEC APPIJICATION FEES 500.00
.' TIt{ Onners Forn 2312 Policy No. AQ156089
Order No. V19340 Amount $L11,o00.00
scHEDttLE A Address
1. Policy Date: september 03, 1992 at 8:Oo A.U.
2. Nane of Insured:
THOI{AS W. FOWLER AND VIRGINIA A. FOIII,ER
3. The estate or intereet in the land descrLbed in this Schedule
and whictr is covered by this policy is:
A Fee Sinple
4. Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at the
date hereof is vested in:
THOI'TAS T{. FOWLER AND VIRGINIA A. FOWLER
5. The land referred to in this policy is situated in EAGLE County,
Colorado, and is described as follows:
I,NIT 20, BIGHORN TERRACE, ACCORDTNG TO THE PI,AT RECORDED
ocToBER 13, 1967 IN BOOK 211 AT PAGE 474, COItNTY OF EAGLE'
STATE OF COLORADO.
Page 1 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached.
TIM Owner Form 2313 Order No. v19340
SCHEDULE B
Policy No.AQ166O89
fhis policy does not insure agalnst losE or danage by reason of the
following:
l. Riglrts or clains of parties in possession not shortn by the
public records.
Z. Easenents, or claims of easementsr Dot shown by the public
records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines,,shortage in area,
encroalhnents, and any facts whLch a correct survey and
inspection of'the prenises would disclose and which are not
shonn bY the Public records-
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, fol. services' labor, or material
thEretofore or f,ereafter furnished, imposed by law and not
shown by the Public records.
5. 1992 TAXES NOT YET DUE OR PAYABI,E AND ASSESSI'TENTS NOT YET CERTIFIED TO THE
TREAST'RERS OFFICE.
6. LIENS FOR UNPAID WATER AND SEWER CHARGES' IF ANY.
7. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR I,oDE TO EXTRACT AND REDIOVE HIS ORE
THEREFRO!{ SHOULD THE SA}IE BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREI'IISES
AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED DECEMbET 17, L9O2' IN BOOK 48
AT PAGE 492.
8. RIGHT OF I{AY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE
I'NITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED DECCTNbET 17'
1902, IN BOOK 48, AT PAG.E 492 AND RECORDED Novembet 22, t939, IN BOOK 123
AT PAGE 525.
g. RESTRTCTIVE covEtrANTS, tfHICH DO NOT CONTATN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER
cliausE, BuT OUITTING RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED 'ON RACE, COLOR, RELTGION,
oR NATIONAL ORIGIN, AS CONTATNED rN TNSTRUMENT RECORDED December 20, L962'
IN BOOK L74 AT PAGE 403 AND AS A}IENDED IN INSTRT'UENT RECORDED APTiI O5,
L963, rN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 33.
10. EASE!,IENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS SHOWN AND RESERVED oN THE
RECORDED PLAT OF BIGHORN TERRACE.
Page
TIM olrner Form 2313 order No. v1934o Policy No. AQ166089
SCHEDULE B
11. PARKING EASEI.TENT AFFECTING ST'BJEST PROPERTY AS SHOI{N ON THE RECORDED PT,AT
OF BIGHORN TERRACE.
12. TER.I{S, CONDfTIONS AND PROVISIONS OF PARTY WALL AGREEI.IENT RECoRDED lilovenber
09, 1988 IN BOOK 494 AT PI'GE 866, AND SI'PPIJEX.IENT THERETO RECORDED;nNE 13,
1991 IN BOOK 556 AT PAGE 92.
Page 3
Joi-nt Property Owner
Written Approval Letter
I, Catherine Hoover Petros, joint o'rA.ners of property located at 4247 Columbine Drive,
provide this letter as written approval of the plans dated November 14, 2005, which have
been submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for the
proposed improvements to be completed at the addresses noted below:
4247 Coltllrr}ine Drive, Unit 19 Bighom Terrace
4247 Cohtrtbine Drive, Unit 20 Bighom Terrace
I understand that the proposed improvements include:
Adding covered entryways across the front of the duplex and enhancing the exterior look
of the properfy. The plans include removing the existing upper balcony and doors and
the lower porch, and adding a sixty-eight square foot addition to the front ofeach unit.
The addition will be covered, with enclosed entryways, and new windows and doors
across the front of the duplex. The front will be hnished with a rock veneer foundation, a
stucco fagade wrapped around to the chimneys and architectural beam ends. The existing
deck will be rebuilt using the existing footprint, and new stone stairs will be added with
wrought iron stair railings.
I further understand that minor modifications may be made to plans over the course of the
review process to ensure compliance with the Town's applicable codes and regulations.
r, f (frt {
Date ' I
Ltutt**, n [,,*)
Ce*linium Associaticn
Written Approval Lener
I, Linda Moore, Secretary of the Bighorn Mutual Recreation and Sanitation Co., am
providing this letter as written approval of the plans dated November 14,2005.
which have been submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department
for the proposed improvements to be completed at the following addresses noted below:
Catherine Hoover Petros, owner of property located at 4247 Columbine Drive, Unit 19
and
Thomas W. Fowler & Virginia A. Fowler, owners of property located a14247 Columbine
Drive, Unit 20
I understand that the proposed improvements include:
Adding covered entryways across the front ofthe duplex and enhancing the exterior look
ofthe property. The plans include removing the existing upper balcony and doors and
the lower porch, and adding a sixty-eight square foot addition to the front ofeach unit.
The addition will be covered, with enclosed entryways, and new windows and doors
across the front of the duplex. The front will be finished with a rock veneer foundation, a
stucco fagade wrapped around to the chimneys and architectural beam ends. The existing
deck will be rebuilt using the same footprint. and new stone stairs will be added with
wrought iron stair railings.
I further understand that minor modifications may be made to plans over the course of the
review process to ensure compliance with the Town's applicable codes and regulations.
--'?-)
,rr,zrfz*/t2,.--,2;'. ;za a {
Date Bishdrn Mutual Recreation and Sanitation Co.
. r.r a!!!+ !!!!r!,{.1-!!:Lr-il5_-i
oorD'lo 'ltNtpo lnov:,lu .I |tlol
oz N !r $rn lcvuBr ITFNIE
l,l,h
EEH
fl
F
E
sottSd 3l{t t 9glloj 3l{l aV'|d,re-[
i,':
j;
i1
!iiii iirFl
;ll r!
tiili
iiiii
^r I
E:i
3i;
a
ttpo .ltffitll9 lr*
it ..
.:: I r,.
/.1 l::.o&.t',' ,,t €- '..- r iJr ''
#,.;7
I
I
Ir !r
lr
IE
9d .'- '! i
-EEiFFEE;:HggEE qtitiin
l!li\fio,xEFBd#tr
I i r i/i
- t - -ot9'
-;--___i
i:il llra
iiii
!lt:
fiii
'ffiffi*)>
6tz | ,','t) /t'
8F lr!
F
Account Number: R:012326
ParcelNumber: zlAllzzl4Arc
Tax Area: SC103
Mill Levy: 47.7190
OwnerName/Address: HOWARD. TAGGART HARzuSON - DINNER.
ELYSE -JT
PO BOX 3351
vArL, co 81658
Legal Description: SUB:BIGHORN TERRACE DESC: UNIT 16
BK-0211 PG-0474 MAP 10-13-62
BK-0213 PG-0338 WD 07-12-68
BK-0302 PG-0561 QCD 04-26-79
R792947 QCD 04-19-02
Physical Address: 004255 COLUMBINE WY VAIL
Acres: 0.08
Number: R012354
ParcelNumber: 2l0ll22l40l5
Tax Area: SCl03
Mill Levy: 47.7190
Owner Neme/Address: BURNOP, ROBERT F., IU
4255COLUMBINE WAY 15
VAIL, CO 81657
LegalDescription: SUB:BIGHORN TERRACE DESC: UNIT 15
BK-021I PG-0474 MAP 10-13-62
BK-0294 PG-0552 QCD l0-31-79
R855854 PTD l0-29-03
Physical Address: 004247 COLUMBINE DRUnit : 15 VAIL
Acres: 0.09
Account Number: R012285
ParcelNumber: 210112214022
Tex Area: SC103
Mill Levy: 47.7190
Owner Name/Address: HOCKMUTH. MARY S.
32I MAGOWA}I AVE
IOWA CnY,lA52246
Legal Description: SUB:BIGHORN TERRACE DESC: LJNIT 22
BK-021 1 PG-0474 MAP 1G.13-62
BK-0260 PG-01 38 09 -16-77
BK-0372 PG-0256 QCD 10-27-83
BK-0675 PG-0015 DC 0t-22-93
R840lll swD07-ll-03
Physical Address: 004247 COLUMBINE DR VAIL
Acres: 0.07
AccountNumber: R010985
ParcelNunber: 2l0ll22l40l8
Tax Area: SCl03
Milt Levy: 47.7190
OwnerName/Address: COOPER DAVID E. &NONNIE E. -JT
8522 VALMONT RD
BOULDER CO 80301
LegalDescription: SUB:BIGHORNTERRACEDESC:LINIT l8
BK-0211 PG-0474 MAP 10-13-62
BK-0552 PG-0889 QCD 04-05-91
Physical Address: 004247 COLUMBINE DR VAIL
Acres: 0.03
Account Number: R012035
ParcelNumber: 2l0ll22l402l
Tax Area: SCl03
Mill Levy: 47.7190
Owner Name/Address: LLEWELLYN. NEAL
C/O LEFF, HAUPERT, TRAW & WILLMAN LLP
POBOX2447
IOWA CITY, IA 52244-2447
Legal Description: SUB:BIGHORN TERRACE DESC: UNIT 2l
BK-021 1 PG-0474 MAP 10-13-62
R840110 SWD 07-l l-03 R878429 WD
04-06-98
Physical Address: 004247 COLUMBINE DR VAIL
Acres: 0.04
Account Number; R012625
ParcelNumber: 210112214017
Tax Area: SCl03
Milf Levy: 47.7190
Owner Name/Address: SFIERR HOWARD P. & VIRGINIA C.
2IO STJMMIT BLVD
ENGLEWOOD, CO 80il3
Legal Description: SUB:BIGHORN TERRACE DESC: LINIT 17
BK-021 I PG-0474 MAP l0-t3-62
BK-0224 PG -07 7 I QCD 06-0 I -72
BK-0265 PG-0061 QCD 09-15-77
BK-0553 PG-0431 QCD 04-05-91
BK-07r9 PG-0640 QCD 12-24-97
Physical Address: 004247 COLIJMBINE DR VAIL
Acres: 0.04
AccountNumber: ROl1480
ParcelNumber: 210112215014
Tax Area: SCl03
Mifl Levy: 47.7190
Owner NamelAddress: PARKS. TMOTHY C.
PO BOX 1790
VAIL, CO 81658-1790
Legal Description: SUB:BIGHORN SUB LOT:20-5 BK-0218
PG-0914 QCD l0-07-70 BK-0253
P G -0226 WD | | -27 -7 2 BK-0253
PG-0916 QCD 03-3r-77 BK-02s3
PG-0183 WD 02-28-77 R737695 WD
08-31-98 R74906s GD 01-r2-01
Physical Address: 004246 COLUMBINE DR VAIL
Acres: 0.64
Status:
I Approved
Corunauuw DEVELopMENT Rounruc Fonut
X Approved with conditions fl Denr'ed
Routed To:George Chalberg, PW
Date Routed:11t23105
Routed By:Elisabeth Eckel
Date Due:11130/05
Description of work:Addition of enclosed entryways at Units 19/20, Bighorn Tenace,
resulting in side setback variance requests
Address:4247 Columbine Drive
Lesal:Lot:19t20 Block: | | Subdivision:Bighorn Terrace Subdivision
Comments:Date Reviewed:
Need additional review by Fire
Elisabeth Eckel - Petros addition..Paoe 1
From: Mike Vaughan To: Elisabeth Eckel Date: 11l3Ol2OO5 10:56:18 AM
Subject: Petros addition..
Hey there, sorry it took so long. That one fell through the cracks. We have no comments, looks like a
milk run too me. Mike.
November 23,2OO5
Mr. and Mrs. Thomas W. Fowler, Jr.
2074 Albion Street
Denver, CO 8O2O7
(fax) 303.393.1 1 34
Re: Planning and Environmental Commission Variance Request
4247 Columbine Drive/Lots 19 - 20, Bighorn Terrace Subdivision
PEC050089
Dear Mrs. Fowler,
Thank you for the e-mail inquiring about the referenced application regarding your duplex in East Vail. I have
begun studying the plans over the past couple of da;a and have scheduled the item for the December 12
Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) agenda. I may or may not have told you that the presence of
at least one applicant (regardless of whether it is you, Catherine, Karl or Jerry) is required at that meeting,
which begins at 2 p.m. here in the Town Council Chambers.
Furthermore, please submit the following items as soon as possible in order to maintain the December 12
review date mentioned above:
* One full-sized set (24" x 36") of plans (every architectunl dnwing that was submifted in 8.5 x 11
format); and
* One full-sized (24" x 36') wet-stamped topographic suruey (a replicate of the rcduced suruey alrcady
submifted). Please be sure that the suruey includes the total lot area.
Those items will allow me to correclly calculate the existing/proposed Gross Residential Floor Area as well as
the amount of floor area encroaching into the side setbacks. The Design Review Board submittal will require
three full-sized sets. However, just one full-sized set will suffice for the PEC review. lf further items are
needed in the course of this review, lwill contact you as soon as possible.
Our office will be open on Friday if you'd like to drop off the plans then. Othenrise, please submit the plans
as early as possible next week in order to maintain the placement of this item on the December 12n agenda.
Enjoy a wonderful Thanksgiving!
Best Regards,
Elisabeth Eckel
970.479.2454
enclosure
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
970-479-21 38
FAX 970-479-2452
www.vailgov.com
rlPY
November 30, 2005
Mr. and Mrs. Thomas W. Fowler. Jr.
2074 Albion Street
Denver, CO 80207
(fax) 303.393.1134
Re: Planning and Environmental Commission Variance Request
4247 Columbine Drive/Lots 19 - 20, Bighorn Terrace Subdivision
PEC050089
Dear Mrs. Fowler,
Thank you for submitting full-sized plans of the Fowler/Petros duplex in East Vail. The plans will be helpful for
reference purposes. However, my main goal in requesting full-sized plans was to be equipped with scaled
plans from which I may calculate conect measurements. The original survey that was submitted in 8.5" x 11"
format was not to the 1" = 10' scale that implied within the key. Likewise, the 24" x 36" plans that you
submitted on Monday have been enlarged and are therefore not able to be measure using the 1" = 10' scale
that is implied. Please submit one scaled set of plans for review by our Department. lf it is easiest to do so,
you may submit these plans to me via e-mail in a digital format: eeckel@vailoov.com.
Thank you for your continued patience throughout what is not always a simple design review process.
f,-p nu.r.uo "u""^
z
m
m
m x
@ -{z o
d isi i ?ql
= fis?2 6;a F'rP
EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE 2OO5
FOWLER / PETROS RESIDENCE
UNTT 19 AI{D 20, BIGHORN TERRACE
VAIL. COLORADO
MIRATIOTITI ARCH]TECT PC
POST OFFTCE BOX 5820
AVON, COLOR^DO 41620
T 970 9,191138
i=
I
c ll tl m n
m
m r
m X a
-{z o
EXISTING SOUARE FOOTAGE 2OO5
FOWLER / PETROS RESIDENCE
UNIT 19 AND 20. BIGHORN TERRACE
VAIL, COLORADO
III IRAIIOI{TI ARCHITECT PC
POST OFFTCE AOX 5820
AVO , COLORADO 8t620
T e7o 940 1138
6
I
ZONE CFIECK
-2J -/t
Lcgal dcscription: Lot
Addrcss
Olncr
Archifctt
Zonc disrict
Lot sizc hr/
Total GRFA
Fiting
Phonc
Phonc
hoposcd usc
Brrildablc
Allorvcd Existinq proloscd - Total
=AuL /r,t .@: = /ass
// lg
Sccondary GRfA + (.125) (675+) =_
* 675 = 425 crcdit plus 250 addition
9/da - ,(77 oronr;-@r",
Rear fr ZA'
,?/@/ btf'l Minimum
3',t 6'
6ocs riis rcqucst involvc a 250 Addirion? # W
Hcigbt
Sctbacks
(30x33)
Landscaping
Rctaining Wall Hciglts
Parking Rquirca4 /'1 a,-,.Encloscd
Caragc Crcdr't
Drivcrvay
Conrplics rvirh TOV Lighting Ord.inancc
Arc finishcd gradcs lcss than Z:l (50%)
Environm cntal,,4Iazatds
(300) (600) (900) (1200)
ICS
b)Rocldall
Proposcd Slopc %
Dcbris Florv
Pcrmittcd slooc /tft v^
Ycs--V- No_
Prcvious conditions of rpproval (chcck propcrty filc);
2) Floodplain
3) Wcrlands
4) Watcr Course Sctback (30) (50)
5) Ccologic Hazards
(-.-7'-Z/-
Is thc propcrty non-conforming? Dcscribc:
D ESIGN REVIE}Y CEE,CKLIST
Q SURVEY
Scalc
' Bcnchmark
Lcgal dcscription
Lot Sizc
Q FLooRPLANs
Scalc
-
GRFA
250 additional CRFA
Crarvlg.ttic Spacc Buildablc Area
Eascmcnts
Topognpby
100 yr. flood plain
Watcr Coursc Sctback
Environmenal Hazards
T1.ees
Utility locations
Spot clcvations
EavcVOvcrhangs (4)
DcclcilBalconics
Gangc conncction
Sitc Gradclslopc
Rctaining 1Va!ls
Fcnccs
Parking/O aragc
Tuming Radius
.Drivdrvay (acciss andgradc) '
Snorv Storagc
Firc Acccss
Q BITLDn.IGELEVATIoNS
Scalc
-:- Color\Matcrials
Roof pitch
Q LANDSCAPEPLAN
Existing trccs
-.Proposcdrces Lcgcnd
MISCELLANEOUS
Q SITEPLAN
Scalc
Building Height
Encroachmcnts
Sctbacks
Site Covcrage
Condo Approval
Titlc rcport (A & B)
Utilify.vcrifi cation form
Pbotos of,sitc
Buil ding material sarnplcs
t .\J, Y CnIlC300n
SunLShadc Arglcs
Utilities (un dcrgroun d)
Vicrv Corridors
Varianccs
Plat rcsbictions
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
December 12,2005
Arequestforafinal reviewof avariance,fromSection 12{G{, Setbacks,Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a
residential addition within the side setbacks, located at4247 Columbine Drive, Unit
20/Bighom Terrace Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto (PEC05-
008e).
Applicant Thomas and Virginia Fowler
Planner: Elisabeth Eckel
I. SUMMARY
The applicants, Thomas and Virginia Fowler, are requesting a variance from Section 12-6G-6,
Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17,Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a
residential addition within the side setbacks, located at 4247 Columbine Drive, Unit 20/Bighom
Terrace Subdivision. The requested variance is the result of a proposal to construct a new entryway
addition upon an existing duplex structure. Staff is recommending approval, with conditions, of the
requested variance because a practical difficulty or hardship exists and approval of the variance
would not constitute a granting of special privilege to this property owner.
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The applicants, Thomas and Virginia Fowler, are requesting a variance from the side setback
regulations specified in Section 12-6G-6, Vail Town Code, in order to construct a new entryway at
the duplex residence they share in the Bighorn Terrace Subdivision. Currently, the duplex is one of
twenty six duplexes within the Subdivision, which was annexed into the Town of Vail in 1974. The
Town zoned the Subdivision Medium Density Multi-Family (MDMF) at the time of annexation, which
prescribes twenty foot setbacks at the front, sides, and rear of each lot. Because the zoning
designation was applied to the lots following the construction of the structures, multiple non-
conformities resulted upon each lot within Bighorn Tenace.
The area proposed for expansion is located at the front of the residence and includes sixty-eight (68)
square feet of Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) forming an enclosed entryway. Unit 20 was
granted a rear setback variance from the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEG) in 1990 for
the construction of a storage shed and the expansion of a dining room at the rear of the duplex. The
footprint of the duplex under consideration (as well as manyother duplexes within the development)
lies somewhat askew atop the property line. As a result, the duplex is located completely within the
eastem side setback. The duplex also cunently extends between five feet (5') and fifteen feet (15')
into the westem setback, leaving a side setback of only five feet (5') at the northwest mrner of the
Lot.
Because the side setbacks figuratively 'overlap', no part of the lot is free from the encumbrance of
side setbacks. As a result, the applicant is requesting a variance to build within the eastem side
setback and partially (five feet) extend into the western setback. The encroachment into the westem
side setback will not result in an encroachment greater than that which already exists today. There
will be no encroachment into the front or rear setbacks as a result of the proposal. The applicant is
concurrently proposing to replace in the same location the exterior stairs and deck located at the front
of the residence within the parking easement, which is twentyfeet (20') deep and encompasses the
same square area as the front setback.
III. BACKGROUND
Many other Lots within the Bighom Tenace subdivision have requested and been granted setback
variances for new construction. Following is a list of associated requests and recommended support
or the lack thereof by Staff, followed by the vote of the PEC.
Date Aoolicant TypC_glBeSueC!Amount of Variance
130 square feet
8 feet
473 square feet
7. 5 feet
75 square feet
8 feet
7 feet
122 square feet
'l8 feet
50 square feet
3, 11,13feet
Staff Recommendation PECAdim
1977 Benysh
1978 Rowe
1978 Alder
1978 Tumbull
1980 Curfinan
1982 Odum
1S83 Houston
1985 Sherr
1985 Nicholson
1990 Benysh
1990 Nillson
2005 Fowlol
GRFA
Setback
GRFA
Setback
GRFA
Setback
Setback
GRFA
GRFA
Setback
GRFA
Setback
GRFA
Setbacks (3)
GRFA
Setback
Setbacks (2)
Setbacks (2)
Setbacks (2)
Denial
Denial
Approval
Approval
Approval
Denial
Denial
Denial
Approval
Denial
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Tabled
Tabled
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Denial
Approval
Approval
Approval
177 square feet Denial
80 square feet Denial
16 feet Denial
395 square feet Denial
third floor directly above Approval
'13, 15 feet Denial
11,15feet Denial
7,20 f6et Approvat
A vicinity map depicting the location of the residence is attached for reference (Attachment A).
Reduced copies of the proposed site plan and elevations are attached for reference (Attachment B)
as are photos of the existing residence (Attachment C), the written request from the applicant
(Attachment D) and the public notice which preceded the request (Attachment E).
IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES
The PEC is resoonsible for evaluatinq a proposal for:
Action: The PEC is responsrb/e for final approvalldenial of a variance.
The PEC is responsible for evaluating a proposal for:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in
the vicinity.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a
specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among
sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this Title without grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation
and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed
variance.
Desiqn Review Board:
Action: The DRB has no review authority on a variance, but must review any acconpanying
DRB application.
Town Council:
Actions of the Design Review Board or the Planning and Environmental Commission may be
appealed to the Town Council or by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the
DRB or PEC ened with approvals or denials, and may uphold, uphold with modffications, or overtum
the Board's decision.
Staff:
The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans
conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the
applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines.
Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation
of the projectwith respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval,
approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process.
V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Zoning Regulations
Section 1 2-2 Definitions
SETBACK The distance frcm a lot or site line, creek or stream measurcd hoizontally to a line or
location within the lot or site which estabtishes the permifted location of uses, structurcs, or buildings
on the site
Secfion 12-GG-6: Medium Density Multi-Family District
Sefbacks; ln the MDMF distict, the minimum front setback shall be twenty feet (20'), the
minimum side setback shall be twenty feet (20'), and the minimum rcar setback shatt be twenty
feet (20').
Secfion 12-17 Variances (in part)
3
12-17-1: PURPOSE:
A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: ln order to prevent or fo /essen such practical difficulties and
unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this title as would rcsult from
strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A
practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions
of a site or the location of existing sfrucfures thereon; hom topographic or physical conditions on
the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, strcet locations or conditions in
the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of stict or literal compliance with a
regulation shail not be a reason for granting a variance.
1 2- 1 7 - 5: P LAN N I N G AN D E NV I RO N ME NTAL CAMMBS/ON A CIlONi
Within twenty (20) days ot the closing of a public hearing on a vaiance application, the planning and
environmental commission shall act on the application. The commission may approve the
application as submitted or may approve the application subject to such modifications or conditions
as rl deems necessary to accomplish the purposes of this title, or the commission may deny the
application. A variance may be revocable, may be granted for a limited time period, or may be
granted subject to such other conditions as fhe commission may prescibe.
12-17-7: PERMIT APPROVAL AND EFFECT:
Apprcval of the variance shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and
construction not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion within two (2) years from
when the approval becomes finaL
V. ZONING ANALYSIS
Address/Legal: 4247 Columbine Drive, Unit 2O/Bighorn Tenace Subdivision
Zoning:Medium Density Multi-Family (MDMF)
Develooment Standard Allowed/Required Existino Prooosed
no change
23ft.
o ft. (Eys ft. w) oft.(Eyl3ft.wf
7 feet no change
Lot Area:
Setbacks:
Front:
Sides:
Rear:
Building Height:
GRFA:
Site Coverage:
Landscape Area:
Parking:
10,000 sq. ft.
20ft.
20 ft.
20ft.
33'
1,054 ft.
847 sq. ft. (45Vo)
565sq. ft. (30%)
2 spaces
4
1,883 sq. ft.
30 ft.
23',
965 sq. ft.
512 sq. ft. (27Yo)
1,371 sq. ft. (73o/o)
2 spaces
no change
1,033 sq. fl.
580 sq. ft. (30%)
1,303 sq. ft. (69%)
no change
v[.SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
North:
South:
East:
West:
Land Use
High Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Zoninq
Residential Cluster
Two Family Residential
Two Family Residential
Agricultural Open Space
VIII. CRITERIAANDFINDINGS
Consideration of Factors Reqardinq the Setback and Parkino Location Variances:
1. The relationship of the requested variances to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
This lot is located in a neighborhood with lot sizes generally smaller than
1,500 square feet. Because the subdivision was platted and constructed
prior to annexation and the application of a zoning designation, a number of
non-conformities exist within the subdivision, including numerous setback
encroachments. As designated in the referenced chart, multiple
homeowners within the subdivision have requested and been granted
variances for encroachments into the setbacks in order to expand and or
update the facades or interiors of the homes. The applicant's request is
similar in nature to previously granled variances. Because each lot within
this subdivision has experienced "physical difficulty due to the size, shape or
dimensions of the site", Staff feels that requests such as the ones granted
have been warranted.
Staff recommends that, if the request is approved, it be paired with
conditions which aid in the improvement of other aspects of non-conformity
on the lot, such as a redesign of the existing deck and staircase to allow for
at least partial placement of the non-conforming parking that is cunently
located entirely within the Town of Vail right-of-way instead of within the
twenty foot parking easement designated at the front of the Lot. This may
involve reducing the existing deck form its cunent depth of eighteen feet ( 1 8')
to approximately three feet (3') in depth and locating the existing staircases
to the east and west of the remodeled deck instead of at the south of the lot,
where the stairs cunently exist directly within the parking easement.
Concunently, Staff recommends that the applicant provides increased
landscaping in front of the proposed addition for additional screening of the
residence, which cunently exhibits significant street visibility. Additionally,
because the party wall and the property line of the duplex are not aligned,
Staff recommends that this issue be brought into conformance through an
updated plat, also as a condition of approval.
Therefore, because the applicant's proposal involves no encroachment into
J
A.
2.
the front setback or the parking easement (therefore the placement of the
proposed addition will not affect the amount of open space between Unit 20
and surrounding units) and does not involve a variance request from site
coverage or landscaping requirements, Staff feels that this request may
concurrently improve conditions upon this lot if paired with appropriate
conditions of approval.
The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege.
Strict and literal interpretation of the setback regulations within the Bighom
Terrace Subdivision has not been historically enforced by the Planning and
Environmental Commission due to the widespread non-conformities that
exist within the subdivision as a result of the timing between construction,
annexation, and zoning designation. Until this point, the PEC has clearly
supported similar treatment of the duplexes in this area, which has involved
frequent approval of variance requests similarto the proposal cunently under
review. Straff recommends that the PEC discuss future treatment of setback
variances for lots within this Subdivision in order to continue to allow for
equal treatment while not providing an unnecessary amount of relief from the
regulations.
The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
The proposal will have some effect on the amount of light and air within the
Subdivision, though the location of the requested addition concems the
periphery of the development, which faces Columbine Drive, where the
amount of available light and air is greater than the amount of light and air
within the Subdivision. As a result, the effect on light and air would be less
intrusive than if the addition was proposed at the east or west sides of the
duplex or at the inner areas of the Bighorn Terrace development. The
proposal will increase the amount of bulk and mass upon the site, though will
not increase the "depfh"of encroachment into either of the side setbacks.
Staffs suggestion for increased landscaping at the front of the lot may help
to provide more flexibility for the Town, should the parking easement ever
need to be permanentlyaccessed for parking, the use forwhich itwas clearly
intended.
The effect of the proposal on the distribution of population, transportation
and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities and public safety, will not be
substantial.
4. Such otherfactors and criteria as the commission deems applicableto
the proposed variance.
The Planninq and Environmental Commission shall make the followinq findinqs
before orantinq a variance:
3.
B.
1 . That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties
classified in the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is wananted for one or more of the following
reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsisteniwith the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do
not apply generally to other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by
the owners of other properties in the same district.
IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends approval, with conditions, of the request
for a variance from Section 12-6G-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17,
Variances, to allow for the construction of gross residential floor area within the side setbacks
located at4247 Columbine Drive, Unit 20/ Bighom Terrace Subdivision based upon the review of
the criteria in Section Vlllof this memorandum and the evidence and testimonypresented as well as
the findings listed below. Staff recommends that, should the Planning and Environmental
Commission choose to approve the application, the following findingsbemade a partof the motion:
1. That the granting of the variances will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
2. That the granting of the variances will not be detrimental to the public health, safety
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation will result in
practical difflculty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives
of the Zoning Regulations.
4. That the strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation will deprive
the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same
district.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the
Community Development Department recommends the following conditions:,
1 . Prior to design review of the associated application, the applicant shall provide plans
designating the reduction of the deck size and the relocation of the stairs to provide a
fully accessible parking easement.
2. Prior to the receipt of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy by the Community
Development Department, the applicant shall plant landscaping to the equivalent of
three (3) six to eight foot tall coniferous trees to the south of the proposed addition in
order to visibly reduce the perceived bulk and mass of the addition.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain from the Public
Works Department a revocable right-of-way permit for the parking that will remain
within the Town's right-of-way.
4. Prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy by the Community
Development Department, the applicant shall receive approval of a revised plat for
Lots 19 and 20, which delineates a property line congruent with the existing party
wall.
5. This approval of this variance request shall be contingent upon the applicant
receiving Town of Vail approval of the related design review application.
IX. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map B. Reduced Plans C. Photos D. Applicant's Request E. Publication Notice
Aftachment: A
gEF
T8;
E6 i 6! r bEE
IEE
:83 {b
FT
-E
E}
EE
FI d5
iE
iE
at
t
E
3
I
o o r
il
=
,f
RH
{}o Fb gE
s8
.EE;
:3€ E
EEE
[$E
HE l- uJ trE bCE t?t'l9 l- t-E#
Attachment: B
8€l] 616 01,6 r
ozgts oowo'IoJ ' o^v
0289 xog 3crJjo Ls@
cd rctJH9uv lr.NonvulII
oowo]oc "rNA
fcwu3r NUoHgrS '02 oNv 6r uNn
3CN30|S3U SOUr3d / U3]MOJ E]
'lvll|t/!{€ns c3d 9002 u3€n3noN t
./l '/
="t ,i () I | ^-:(n I I *o.+----+-g"rlE-E is- H ll:t;$3 #"Il :E f<-'.s{GHs
'N Eg I rr ;.\.r : "lE
z
F z l
=tr ul F 1
ID o
s+pd
6.u
dO 4u,>t!o6
dE 9H
X=Y=7i
);oE
Ho.
@Z ztr
5H o-z P6 =z
\
-z x<
ut i:i ;i z:i qtr6
Lr, ao t!
@O rlJF lz
ooe r9;- ^z :u5
HYo
-EZ (r(!l
t7.q9'
{au
@ p
\d \a
F
d.
t-
(,
=I
8rd
uv
8T
/<
aa
./^
(oe'
3 .,/
t .:'
s/ ,<
"r5 3
!$t s:+ Hq \ zo \ .r>\ 9H
l*;e
EYE,J trr;'EEZ
.'at36- -
,03'O ,,^fi.,
pta;ili
t:ilt'rl
drtit'ilnui.,
8€116t6 026 r
029t8 ocvao]oJ 'xo^v
0z€€ xos SJllo rsod
3d rcfJHcuv trNor{Vulll
oovuo'loc "llv^
3CWU3r NUOHo|E '0e ONV 6t JNn
fcN3ots3u sour3d / uflMoJ
9002
z
J
FF
^e2 s .-eU P
2,af
<E: <
Hg= F
_:F i!
R:9 6
*F=Egs F
=[ l +tl 0l
=
--r---l
o z tr a X g,
t!
[!
z
a [-
A t-Jl
TJ
8Ell6t6 016 I
02918 0(two1()3' o^v
0289 xo6:clrro tsod
cd rc3lHcuv uNoltvutn
o(vuo'lo3'-rv^
30vuu3r NUoHgrs '02 oNv 6l J.tNn
fcNSqtsSu sour3d / u3'lMoJ
9002
o z
tr a
X
u,
J
I.IJ
LrJ J
tr
I,IJ (L
(L
l
E
o
0.d
9
8fr,616 016 r
0e0!s oovuo]o3'MIAY
0z8f xog 3cHlo rsod
0d rcSltHcuv lrNonvuln
oovuoloc '-ltv^
ltcvuu3J. NuoH9tE '02 oNv 6l l.t n
fcN3ots3u soul3d / u3-rMor
9002
o z
tr a x
u,z o
tr
[rJ J
TU
I F f o
CN
l
8€1t 6t6 025 t
029t8 (,0wo10c 'ilo^v
0289 xos 3JJro rsod
3d TOSJHCUV |lNofivutn
oowo-roc'-ltv^
:tcvuu3r NuoH9tS '02 oNV 5t INn
3CN30|S3U SOUEd / Ufli OJ
900e
(,z tr a x g,
z o
tr
IU
TJJ F (t)
uJ
Selr 616 0r,6 r
029t8 00wo103 'l{o^v
ozl9 xoa 33Elo lsod
3d I33IH3UV llt{Ol|vutll
oowoloc'llv^
fSvuu:tl NUoH9ts '02 oNv 6t l|Nn
3CN30|S3U SOUrfd / U3]MOJ
9002
o 1
a X
u1 z o
tr
LJI
lU
a
uJ
=
8ett 60t oae l'
r'a9r3 qmfirl(tc 'l{o/rv
0289 xo5 sJHrO rAOd
cd rc3LtHSuv ll.NollMullr
oovuo]o3 ''ltv^
3CWUaJ. NUOHglg'02 ONV 61 ! n
3CN:|OrSSU SOUl3d / U3li OJ
-IVllJnSns 33d 9002 uf€n3noN tl .6 Fhtr
4g:'.Ei E9fi s= Sr
d$i*E ig
z4 a,
BH
7
E
E
o
a
{:-:
9U
io
F
ulo !!;
d!2
sg
3B
9*
c
?
iia
5U
oBl
-ll Ftl'
z9l.fe
4e_i>Ff IL
1l
I
I
z
.o r-' E tlt :gH :E5 E
ol ol ol -l
ilb
atr
b
o [J o o (L o t g
z o
F o o
o z
\l
C)
LU o
[rJ
LU
z
il:El'
kllt
+
4V
=F
Es2
E<
8fr 1?i>
E'
I
I
I
I .Y(:
I /IJEJ I clz)TI" EEE
IEF ffFE + *rF adi
/
z o
z
r{
9X
oz zt-
dTJ
..E
*69 6..9 iP=iiZ =EH5 -izs
F;A
,==g€o (\l
l-z f
=o?>I "'i
l
1Z
b9
@ p
VH
z
L; ti =dl : E
RI g9 B :
!19 ; es iE
Elt
=
xE 9g
8€lt at6 018 r
@s[a oovuolot 't{or\Y
oaG ro8 rliJjo laod
3d rcSxHJUV tlNollwllr
oqvuo'lo:r ''llYA
a9wurl Nuol{cls '0e oNv 6l rlNn
3CNf,OlS3U SOUrlld / U31/l OJ
lvr-Uhtsns c3d 9002 u38n3^oN tl
o
LU
U)o
o-o t g
ul
uJ J z
I,JJ
tu
(L
o
C)
z
,sE t q
E$il "5 Hr
Eqi EE ig
z
Ei t- =;L : X eEg E ;.==lYi g$ dq
$Ei *6 :g
iv
xe
<P
HE
ao rt 3i rl
9Er ,/t t
s o
IR i<
H p
iH i?
8err 616 026 r
029t8 oovto]o? 'No/rv
0t89 xos fSBlo rsod
3d LC3I|H3UV tINOnVUln
oovuol0c ''llv
3CVUUSr NUOHCTS '02 ONV 6t l.tt{n
3SNfOrS:tU SOUt3d / U]]MOj
"lvll[,\8ns c:ld 9002 uSanfnoN rr
I
tl o-
i
Ha 9d
r6
lllt oo
o
tu
U)o
TL o tr g
J
LU
LU
t
LU (L
TL
=
HE
a -6-
:P
=o =fl 3o
P3
5$
=o -n ;6
oFl c! =il F Fil'
= Hpln I .o+
8€tl616 016 L
029t8 ooYuo]oJ 'NoAv
0289 xos SJJro rsod
3d rclt Hcuv trNovlvutn
oowo-roc'llv^
3CVUU3I NUOH9|S '02 ONV 6t J n
3CN30|S3U SOUrfd / Uf-rMOJ
lvLt_tnEns cfd 9002 uSsn3noN tt
o
9
o
a
$ts
1
o
s t
-^r
za
,,
i!O
7.
B
4 i
B
ot ol ot ol it ;l it il
cli. *l:
ot* oto FI FI ++
o I
=-
bi
+
ssr
8=H
E22e
:=54
t- ,2 U6 Hd gp 6t
zEe Ei
?,".^9 23
ils3 FE
o
[rJ
ct)o
TL o tr g
z o tr
lrJ J
lIJ
I
o
U)
L
=
9
z 9
o
z o
l
=
I
BStt 6t6 0t6 L
02018 ogvuo'loc 'NoAv
0289 xos 3cHJo rsod
3d r33[H3UV lrNof,vulvl
oovuo'loc "rv^
:tcvuu: l{uoH9ts '02 oNv 6l l|Nn
3CN:|O|S3U SOUI3d / U:llMOl
]V!_tV\SnS C3d 9002 USgn3nON
'l
I
tz^=
T]l-e
tif-
F.*v
x3 <6
x6
PE
66
5^d 'a<
o
lU
ct)o (L o t g
z o
tr
IJJ
uJ
F
U)
TU
2 -
I
3
5 H:
!E5H
B;38
HBHE
?!=E
=9.-iA
x9 Y6
5
z
o
=
oqvuo-lo9'-IvA
tSvuu:tr NuoHgtg '02 oNv 6t JNn
sCNfOrSfU SOUr3d / U3]MOJ
aEtt 6t6 015 r
tlzgt0 00vto]o3't{o/rv
028!i xog 3JHJo rsod
3d rc3IH3UV trNonvutn
wu_tw€ns c3d 9002
siz
? I?6EF i9 ZEQ;a= xi;e.,
386 HP:Eg
;Ea ag=rE
=,rH
urE ; Rd
= 16
; 9a
t;4
F d5
o
LU
U)o (L o tr g
z o tr
lrJ
[J
F a
UJ
=
Selt 6i6 016 I
02918 0(Ivuo1()3 'IoAv
0z8s xos ScBJo J.sod
9d ICSIIHSUV llNOllvulll
oqvdo-ro9 ''llv^
sCVUU3r NUOHCTS'02 ONV6r I| n
3CN30IS3U SOUrSd/Ufli OJ
'lVILlUgnS C3d 9002 !ro vz=? *6EE d9 248;XE ;Ee 3e ZdZ q'8HEi
nEa:i;HE
H"'
63
a=<o
H5:g
69 !;=
H3NF
o ul
U)o
o-o v.g
z o
tr
C)
I.JJ
U)
8etr 616 016 I
otsts oovuo103 r{o^v
oz89 xos 3ctJlo -rsod
9d rc3[H9UV |lNonvdllr
oovuo-roc "r|vn
rcwufr NUoHcts '02 oNv 6t I|Nn
3CNfOtSfU SOUISd / U3lMOl
"lvrul t8ns c3d 9002 u38!rt3^oN tt
fi-ff:
6
FO
I.JJ a o (L o
x.
TL
dl z I F o
LIJ a
tu
t!o
___i<_ _
F-----t o
I -1-- tr l'-r - o t-:1 ) lU -.+-l (D
lt,t'1 tF f-I IL >.J
Attachment: C
'7&ta'f ,
->- /--d
1 q
9
I
$
e t-r
,J
I
=
lr
nE=
F lilH {i
A written statement addressing the following:
a. The relationship ofthe requestedvariance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
The area is residential and we are experiencing a growth in the size
and qualities of the homes that are being built in our area. We
enjoy our duplex "community" but wish to upgrade the look of the
property in keeping with the improving neighborhood.
b. The degree to which relieffrom the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility
and unifurmity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to qttain the
objectives of this title without grant or special privilege.
Many of the houses in Bighom Terrace are non-conforming
-r
WBuilding rules and codes have
changed. The homes are small and densely placed in our area and
therefore require special privileges in order to keep the area vibrant
and beautiful. dfuv€iGe '
itl.-
keeping with the changing neighborhood. Because East Vail is a
residential area, we are interested in updating our duplex to blend
nicely with the new houses that have been built on our street. Our
design includes stone, stucco and wrtpught iron which are being
used by the surrounding new houses. Also, our project would
increase the safety of entering our houses becausel*tdr
r
ahazard.
c. The efect of the variance on light and air, distribution ofpopulation,
transportation, trafiic facilities, utilities and public safety.
The variance would not affect light and air for any neighboring
homes. If anlthing, we are adding more light to our own interiors
with our windows and the entry way lighting which will be safer.
Because it is a residential area and our duplex is in the middle of
the block, our improvements will have no effect on transportation,
traffic facilities, utilities and public safety.
How the request complies with adopted Town of Vail planning policies
and deve I opment obj ective s.
The request complies with adopted TOV planning policies and
development objects because we are utilizing the new GRFA rules
to enlarge our duplex, adding the safety of enclosed entryways and
updating the look of our duplex with new windows, rock fascia"
and stucco. We believe the material on our house now is very
dated and this project will improve the looks greatly which we
believe is the obiective of the Town of Vail.
*m
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the
Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town
Code, on December 12, 2005, at 2:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in
consideration of:
A request for a final reMew of a variance, from Section 12-6G-6, Vail Town Gode,
pursuant to Chapter 12-17,Yariances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition
within the side setback, located at 4247 Columbine Drive, Unit 19/Bighorn Terrace
Subdivision and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Catherine Petros Planner: Elisabeth Eckel
A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 126G-6, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12-17,Yariances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition
within the side setback, located at 4247 Columbine Drive, Unit 20/Bighorn Terrace
Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Thomas and Virginia Fowler Planner: Elisabeth Eckel
A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-78-5,
Permitted and Conditional Uses; Above Second Floor, Vail Town Code, to allow for a
business office on the third floor, located at 333 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail
Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant Remonov & Company, Inc., represented by Pylman & Associates, Inc.Planner: Bill Gibson
A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7E4,
Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a public utility and public service use,
located at 2Q77 North Frontage Road (Brandess Building)/Lot 39, Buffehr Creek
SubdivisiDn, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Cingular Wireless PCS, represented by General Dynamics-Network
Systems Planner: Bill Gibson
A request for a final review of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor
Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for a resubdivision of Lots 2 and 3, Bighorn
Subdivision, located at 5087 and 5097 Main Gore Drive, and setting forth details in
regard thereto.Applicant Fred and Janet Steich, represented by James Salmons Planner: Matt Gennett
Attachment: E
't,r-
lli"t''r 4 L'l
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection
during office hours at the Town of Vail community Development Department, 75 south
Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that
precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department
Please call 970*479-2138 for additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please
cr'll97U479-2#6, Telephone forthe Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Pubfished Norrember 25,2005, in the Vail Daily.
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
lDecerah$bfiLd0o5
Mr. and Mrs. Thomas W. Fowler. Jr.
2074 Albion Street
Denver, CO 80207
(fax) 303.393.1134
Ms. Catherine H Petros
25119 US Highway40
Golden, CO 80401
(fax) 303.526.0560
Re: Planning and Environmental Commission Variance Request
4247 Columbine Drive/Lots 19 - 20, Bighorn Terrace Subdivision
PEC0s0088. PEC050089
FtLE /j//Py
Dear Mrs. Fowler and Ms. Petros,
Congratulations on yesterday's Planning and Environmental Commission approval of two side setback
variances at each of the referenced lots. The PEC approved the applications with the following conditions:
1 . Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain from the Public Worl<s
Depaftment a revocable ightof-way permit for the patuing that will remain within the
Town's ight-of-way.2. Prior to issuance of a Temponry Ceftificate of Occupancy by the Community
Development Depaftment, the applicant shall receive approval of a revised plat for Lots
19 and 20, which delineates a propefty line congruent with the existing party wall.3. The approval of this vaiance request shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving
Town of Vail approval of the related design review application.
Please don't hesitate to contact me with any further questions. I have attached the design review action
forms for your reference. I look forward to receiving the associated Design Review Board request soon.
Again, thank you for your continued patience throughout what is not always a simple design review process.
Elisabeth Eckel
970.479.2454
enclosure
f,-p ^""""o 'n'"o
TOWNOF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970-479-2t38
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -.B.ta!.o-'*- at-"-tc. <--r--
\-) -{ ?.6
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT Permit #: 806-0133
Project # PRI06-0045
Job Address: 4247 COLUMBINE DR VAIL Status. . . : ISSUED
Location.....: 4247 COLUMBINE DRM, UNIT 20 Applied . . ; 0512512W6
Parcel No...: 2101122140,20 Issued . .. : O7llOl2W6
Expires. ..: 0ll06l20{)j
owNER FOWLER, THOMAS W., JR 05/2s/2O06
VIRGINIA A. FOWI-,ER I-,IVING TRUST
2074 Ar-,BrON ST
DENVER co 80207
APPITTCANT CASABONNE EISIERPRISES 05 /25/2006 Phone z 9?0-476-5435
PO BOX 516
VAIL
coLoRADO 81558
I-,icense: 155-B
coNrRAcToR CASABONNE ENTERPRTSES 05 /25/2006 Phone: 970-4'16-5435
PO BOX 515
VAII,
coLoRADO 81658
l,icense:155-B
Description:
ANDING A COVERED TMTRY A}ID NEW WII{DOWS,. ROCK VENEER AI{D
STUCCO
Occupancy: R3 Single Family Residence
Type Construction: V B
Valuation: $63,000.00 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Total Sq Ft Added: 0
**+*+********{.****i.**'tl.***t+*l.*i(*{.t****************{(*l.+**t***}***+*
Building---- > S'134.75 Reshrarant Plan Review- > $0.00 Totat Calculated Fees- > $l,215.34
Plan Check-- > $477.59 Recreation Fee----------5 $0.00 Additional Fees----- > $0.00
Investigation- > $O.00 TOTAL FEES-------------> $1,215.34 Total Permit Fee----*-> $1,215.34
will catl---- > 53.00 Parrpnts-----'---- > $1,215.34
BALANCE DUE-----.> $O.OO
Approvals:
Item: 05100 BUfITDfNG DEPARTMENP
06/08/2006 JN!4 Action: AP
IIEM: O54OO PITANNING DEPARTMENT
06/02/2006 ee Action: AP
rIeM: O55OO FIRE DEPARTMEI T
06 / 07 / 2006 mcgfee Action: AP
Item: 05500 PIIBLIC WORKS
06/02/2006 gc Action: AP No staging in
Right of Way.
++*+***********r*
See the Conditions section of this Document for any that may apply.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge Orat I have read this application, fitled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot
plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with tbe information and plot plan, to comply
with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design
review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUn HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEIHONE AT lf7$2149 OR AT OtiR OFI.ICE FRoM 8:0ll
AM-4 PM.
OF OWNER OR CONTRA
**{.***********.**r*,tr**.{.***.**.**t *.t!**tr*,lr*)F*,F*:t*d(*'F*,F*****,F***,1.*********i.*.***{.***{.*:1.*:1.*****tc*:F**.*:t ***{.*1.*,1.*{.*
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Permit#: 806-0133 asof07-10-2006 Status: ISSUED
* *i ** 4(* * * ** {. *. {.* * * ** * * ** t( * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** ** ** * ** * *d. **** ** ** ** ** *** ** *{. *:* * * *!:F ** ** ** *,F ** **** *t ***********,F*,F*
Permit Type: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT Applied: 05125120[16
Appticant: CASABONNE ENTERPRISES Issued: 0T11012006
970-476-5435 To Expire: 0ll06l2ffi7
Job Address: 4247 COLUMBINE DR VAIL
Location: 4247 COLUMBINE DRIVE, UNIT 20
ParcelNo: 210112214020
Descripion:
ADDING A COVERED ENTRY AND NEW WINDOWS: ROCK VENEER AND
STUCCO
**'1.:1.***{.***it:1.***:1.*'Fit{.**:t*:t*r(,1.:{.*,****,1.***t!*****4.**** COnditiOnS ****************,1.***,********{.**.*************
Cond: 12
(BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE
COMPLIANCE.
Cond: 16
(BLDG.)I (SFR) SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED PER SECTION
R3I3 OF THE 2OO3 IRC.
**+,1********+**********{.'t **{.************+****************:}**+*++*+*t********+{.**t**+****+***
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statement
*********+*!r.'r.*,r.*******:t *****+***+{r*f++******+**************************ri++***+**************
Amount: $1.215.34 07/r0/200602:30 PM
Init: DDG
Notation: cagabonne
Statement Nunber: R060000954
Palment Method: Check
Enterprises 183 0
Permie No:
Parcel No:
site Address :
Locatsion r
Thi6 Palzment:
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code
BP 00100003L11100
PF 00100003112300
wc 00100003112800
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
PI,AN CHECK FEES
WIIL CAI,I., TNSPECTION FEE
**** * * +*+* ** * **1.*********+***+*****++*******++*+'+ +* * +* ++* + * ** * * * * * * * * + + **+*+****************
805 - 013 3 Type: ADD/ALT SFR BurL,D PERMIT
2I0t- 1_22 - 1402 - O
4247 COTJUYIB INE DR VAII.'
4247 COI,UMBINE DRTVE,
$1,21s .34
DescriDtion
I]N]T 20
ToEaI Fee6:
Tota1 ALL Pmts :
Balance:
$L,21s.34
$1, 21s.34
$0.00
Current Pmt,6
734.75
477.59
3 .00
APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UN
Project #:oovr
APPLIC
plumbing, mechanical, etc.t
BoG- or33
Separate Permits are
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, Colorado 81657
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
General Contraclor:(fr AMittEeA(&fr,Jt€>-' r'vl(.
Town of Vail Reg. No.:
tbs- ts
Contact Person and enone #'s:3gO $bB3 (€Ge(ryaeclrue iiro stas
Emaif address, q)>.t3<f Q) y'Art.r.{gf Fax#: qrc 4f6=435-
Contractor Sisnatu16(
d^,CuYrS,A^^!=
coM V PLETE VALUATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMIT (Labor & Materials
BUTLDING: $ (oZ,ooo. oo ELECTRTCAL:$ I OOC. OO OTHER: $
PLUMBING: $MECHANICAL: $rorAL: $ (D3,0OO. OO
For Parcel # Contact
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Accepted By:
4r't;+!=] ': :
l4AY z B 2006
02/09l20os
T(.)tA/Nr ntr \/ail
?ar_ce.!#ztol - tzL- t40z-o
Job Name:*O
|}o,sr Tee*fl<-g- * Zo JobAddress: 42.41 Cot-t-t|n6|A{g plRlvE.
*2o
Legal Description ll Lot: ll Block:Filing:Subdivision: 6tbHoe^F{ f€e!|re
Owners.Name: . --" ?A'o-nri,tss W. tror^rueR Address:ro74 4l^6loN sT DEFjJE€ tO Phone:4.\3 g3 lt&4
ArchitecVDesioner:
snr ?arnou?r A&A rrtrCT P(-Address: Etozoz p.o. Rox5azU_ Av0r..r.c0 el162f]"non,qn lrsF{
il?9'$"ffiuerrEa.cor\c llf$'nex 2747 uqlL.co gt({sb ll'h""47b 2a27
Detailed description of work:
AOOttVr A(s.1€8€]b EHIRJ. N€w tr.rrr.r0ora.lS ROCI{va.,@-. 6rvq,o
WorkClass: New() Addition( ) Remodel Vf Repau() Demo( ) Other( )
WorkType: Interior( ) Exterior( ) Both({Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes ( ) No (?Y
Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Two-family 1ff n4uni-tamily ( ) Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other( )
No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building:No. of Accommodation Units in this building:
No/Type of Fireplaces Existing: Gas Appliances ( ) GasLogs(l) Wood/Pellet ( ) Wood Burnino (
No/Type of Fireplaces Proposed: Gas Appliances ( ) Gas Logs ( ) WoodiPellet ( ) Wood Burninq (NOT ALLOWED)
Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes ( ) No (V )Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes ( ) No (lzT
F:\cdev\FoRMS\Permits\Building\building_J)ermiLDOC Page 1 of 16
f,Hl )
Questions? Call the Building Team at 479-2325
Depaftment of Community Development
Project Name: e[o'/r0g]\ (6AMt€- w Zo
Project Address:4L4/ coLorry3l.rE DRtvr=-
/ This Chxklirt must be ampleted before a Building Permit aoolication is
accepted.
o All pages of application is complete
{ Has DRB approval obtained (if required) Provide a copy of approval form
s Plan Check Fee required at submittal for projects valued over $100,000.00 (see attached fee
. schedule)
Complete site plan submitted
a TPublic Way Permit application included if applicable (refer to Public Works checklist)
t ;taging plan included (refer to Public Works checklist) No dumoster.oarkino or material storaoe
/allowed on roadwavs and shoulders without written aooroval
fl Asbestos test and results submitted if demolition is occurrino ai Architect stamp and signature (All Commercial and Multi famil
d ,r', floor plans includin-g building sections anO etevation(ii
{'
q
I q
I q/
v
4 sets of olans for SFR
d Full structural plans, including design criteria (i,e.loads)
d Structural Enoineer stamo and sionature on structural r Structural Engineer stamp and signature on structural plans (All Commercial and Multi Family)
Soils Report must be submitted prior to footing inspection
Fire resistive assemblies specified and penetrations indicated
r'smoke detectors shown on plans 61Wl*1
Types and quantity of fireplaces shown
Applicant's Signature:
Date of submittal:
Received By:
F: \cdev\FORMS\Permits\Building\building_-permit. DOC Page 2 of 16 02l09l2o0s
PI.AN CHECK FEES TABLE
Department of Community Development
Building Safety and Inspedion Sevices
75 huth Frontage Red
Vail, Colorado 81657
970479-2138
Fil( 970479-2452
www.vailgov,com
Plan check fees are required for projects with a valuation over $100,000, at the time of Building permit
submittal. Please use the table below to calculate your plan check fee total.
$100,000-$150,000 Multiply by
$150,001-$250,000 Multiply by
$250,001-$400,000 Multiply by
$401,000-$750,000 Multiply by
$750,001-$ 1,000,000 Multiply by
.0055 of Valuation Total
.005 of Valuation Total
.0045 of Valuation Total
.004 of Valuation Total
.0035 of Valuation Total
Valuations over $1,000,000 will be calculated by the Town of Vail Building Department.
If you have any futher questions, please contact the Town of Vail Building Department at 970-479-2128.
F: \cdev\FORMS\Permits\Building\buildingpermit. DOC Page 3 of 15 02109/2oos
ASBESTOS TESTTNG REQUIREM ENTS
THE TOWN OF VAIL AND STATE OF COLOMDO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HFALTH REQUIRE ASBESTOS TESTING
ANY TIME WHEN MORE THAN i6O S.F. OF MATERTAL VVILL BE DISTURBED OR REMOVED.
AN ASBESTOS TEST AND REPORT IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WTIH YOUR BUILDING PERMiT APPUCATION
FOR ALL REMODEL, ADDMON OR OTHER PROJECTS INVOLVING ANY DEMOUTION OR REMOVAL OF BUILDING
MATERIALS THAT MAY CONTAIN ASBESTOS, BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTED AFTER OCTOBER 12, 1988 THAT HAVE
NO ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERTAE ARE ErcMPT.
A COPY OF THE REPORT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPUCATION
\,,. I have included the asbestos test and report with my building permit application
,)o Lb6p
\0q,
OR
o l certify my project will not disturb or remove more than 160 s,f, of building material. The construction
plans submitted with my application clearly indicate this information, ffhis will be verified during plan
review, and will delay your project if found to be inaccurate)
applicant signature date
OR
o The building was constructed after October 12, 1988. The date of construction was
original constuction date
applicant signature
0t wz{
F :\cdev\FORfrlS\Permits\Bui ldin g\building_lrermit. DOC
date
Page 4 of 16 02109/200s
BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME
If this permit requires a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval, Engineer's (Public Works) review and approval,
a Planning Department review or Health Department review, and a review by the Building Department, the
estimated time for a total review will take as long as three (3) weeks.
All commercial (large or small) and all multi-family permits will have to follow the above mentioned maximum
requirements. Residential and small projects should take a lesser amount of time. However, if residential or
smaller projects impact the various above mentioned departments with regard to necessary review, these
projects may also take three (3) weeks to review and approve.
Every attempt will be made by this depaftment to expedite this permit as soon as possible.
I, the undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time frame. I also understand that if the permit
is not picked up by the expiration date, that I must still pay the plan check fee and that if I fail to do so it may
affect future permits that I apply for.
Asreed to av: (G r6{L (ffif*Y:wJF-
^ Print name
&GrA,J:xM^^---
Project Name:
Date: Olzghv
I'
Signature
F:\cdev\FORM5\Permits\Buildrng\building jermit.DOC Page 5 of 16 021091200s
Please read and check off each of the items below.
(Copies of complete text are available upon request)
CODE 5-2-10: DEPOSITS ON PUBLIC WAYS PROHIBITED
Unlawful deposits: Subject to subsection C thereof, it is unlawful for any person to litter, track or deposit or cause to
be littered, tracked or deposited, sand, gravel, rock, mud, dirt, snow, ice, or any other debris or material upon any
street sidewal( alley or public place, or any portion thereof.
Notice; Abatement: The Director of Public Work may notifo and require any person who violates or causes another
to violate the provision of subsection A hereof, or who has in the Director's employment a person who violates or
causes another to violate the same, top remove such sand, gravel, rocks, mud, dirt, snow, ice or any other debris or
material within twenty four (24) hours after receipt of said notice by the Director of Public Works. In the event the
person so notified does not comply with the notice within the period of time herein specified, the Director of Public
Works, or other authorized agent, may cause any such sand, gravel, rocks, mud, dirt, snow, ice, debris or any other
material to be removed from any street or alley at the expense of the notified.
Summons and Penalty: As an alternative to the notice for removal provided in subsection B above, any person
who violates or causes another to violate the same, may be issued a summons to appear before the Municipal Court of
the Town for said violations, and upon being found guilty of a violation hereunder be punished as provided in Section
1-4-1 of this code.
Notice and Penalty: It is unlawful for any person to fail or refuse to comply with the notice of the Director of Public
WorK as provided in subsection B hereof, and any such person shall, in addition to payment of the expense of removal
incurred by the Director of Public Works, as provided in subsection B hereof, upon being found guilty of a violation
hereunder, be punishable as provided in Section 14-1 of this Code. (1997 Code: Ordinance 6 (1979).
CODES 7-3A-t AND 7-3A-3: PARKING OBSTRUCTING TRAFFIC & IMPOUNDMENT AUTHORIZED
No person shall park any vehicle upon a street or at any other place within this Municipality in such a manner or under
such conditions as to interfere with the free movement of vehicular traffic or proper street or highway maintenance.
(ord.2(1e58) 5 1)
Whenever any police officer finds a vehicle attended or unattended, standing upon any portion of a street or upon any
place within this Municipality in such a manner as to constitute a violation of any section of this Article, or left
unattended for a period of twenty four (24) hours or more and presumed to be abandoned under the conditions
prescribed by Colorado Revised Statutes section 42-4-1102, as amended, the officer shall require the vehicle to be
removed or cause it to be removed and placed in storage in the nearest garage or other place of safety designated or
maintained by this Municipality, and the charges for towing and storage of such vehicle shall be charged to the owner
of the vehicle in addition to a ten dollar ($10) impoundment charge. (Ord. 2(1958) $ 3: Ord. 28(1981) 5 1)
I have read and wiil comply with the above code provisions:
Position or Relationship to Project:
Date Signed: Slf 4AA
F: /evcryone/forn:"vbldperm 7
Fi\cdev\FORMS\Permits\Building\buildingJermit. DoC Page 11 of 16 021091200s
rl
Vail 2006
Vail Village and LionsHead Village Construction Hours
Information Handout
Problem Statement
The Vail Village and LionsHead Village are invaluable assets to the community. Thousands of people clme to Vail each year to
sightsee, recreate, shop and to enjoy everything the Vail Valley has to offer. The community and merchants rely upon our guests to
generate revenue. Our summer/winter guests expect a pleasant experience while in Vail.
To insure that all of the proposed construction has as little negative impact on the ommunity and on our guest as possible, the Town
of Vail finds it imperative to create and implement the Vail Viflage and LionsHead Village Construction Hours Handout.
It would be irresponsible for the Town of Vail, the construction contractors and the merchants, to not actively participate to minimize
the impact of construction in the Vail and LionsHead Village areas.
The Vail Village Streebcape Project will continue through 2006,Improvements scheduled for
2005 will be concentrated along Gore Creek Drive west of the Children's Fountain, Gore Creek
Promenade and around the frontage of the Mill Creek Couft Building. Additional streetscape
improvements are scheduled to begin along East Meadow Drive.
All construction projects and/or remodels within the Vail Village Core Area should contact
Scott Bluhm, Town of Vail Streetscape Coordinator, at 970-477-3418 for fufther information.
Givens
The following givens are intended to provide the basic foundation by which construction will be completed in
the villages:
. The public's health, safety and welfare shall be honored at all times..
. Adequate pedestrian, loading/delivery, vehicle, and emergenry vehicle access and circulation shall be
maintained.
. Roadways and pedestrian walkways shall be kept clean and free of dift and debris.
. All construction deliveries, equipment, tools and materials entering the Vail Village and pedestrian areas
must go through CheckPoint Charlie. All LionsHead construction activity must go to the Vail Police
Department for a parking permit. Do not use delivery zones for construction parking; refer to approved
staging plan or make other arrangements for parking.
. The hours of outside construction activity shall be as follows:
- April 15 - June 23 & September 5 - November L7, 7:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m., seven days a week.
June 3O thru September 1, work must end by 4:0O p.m. on Fridays.
November 13 - April t5,2007 work allowed within daylight hours only. ..
- Deliveries shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 11:30 a,m, on Gore Creek Drive and 7:00 a,m.
to B:30 a.m. on Bridge Street.
F: \cdev\FORMS\Permits\Bu'lding\building-J]ermit. DOC Page L2 of 16 o2l09/zoos
Deign Revieru Board
ACTIOIII FORtrl
Departfi€nt of Community Development
75 sou$ Frontege Roed, vail Cdordo 81657
tel:970.44.2139 fax:970.479.2,f52
web: www.vai lgrov-corn
mtiltrv&
Ptoj€ct llarne:
Protect Deso,lpdon:
Padlcipants:
OWNER FOWLE& THOI'IASW., ]R OA2Uzffi
VIRGINIA A. FOWLER LTUNG TRUST
2074 AlBrOr{ 5T
DE}TVER
co 80207
APPIICANT FOWLER, THOI',|AS W., JR 0UZI|2006
VIRGINIA A, FOWI,"ER LrVI}IG TRUST
2074 A|EION ST
DENVER
co 80207
ProjertA&lress: 4247 @LullBINE DR VAIL Locadon:
4247 COLUMBINE DRIVE, UNIT 20
Legal Descripuon: Lot: Blodc $rbdMnion! BIGI-ORN'IERRACE
Parall{umber: 2101-122-1402{
Comfi€nts: all rnaterials to matdt o<Hing
DRB llumDer: DR8060034
FIML APPROVAL rcR. A MINOR ALTERATION-ADDIITG A @\'ERED ENTRYIA'AY ACROSS THE
FRONT OF CI{.JPI..O( AND ADDING WINDOWS, ROtr VENEER A!{D STUCCO ON UMT 20
Motion By:
Seoond Byr
Vote:
Conditions:
BOARD/SilAFF ACTIO}I
AcUon: APPROVED
Dah of Apprurah O3l O9120O6
C.ond:8
(PLAN): No dnnges to d|ese plans may be rnade wit|out the written onsent of Toryn of
Vail sftiff and/or the apgopdate review orrnitbe(s).
Cond: 0
(P|AN): DRB approral does not @rutitub a pennit frr butlding. Ptease @ftsult wlth
Toum of Vail BuiHirg personnel prhr to corrilructbn activities.
@nd:201
DRB approval shall not b€@rne valH tur 20 da)€ tullotrirg tfre daE of apprwal.
Cond:202
Approval of this proied strall lapee and bore voftt one (1) yer trlotrrlng SE date
of final apprcnl, unbss a building permlt b issued and @nsblrcilon ls commenced
and is diligenW pursued tound completion.
l'leg 12 OS l2: 35P
j - il€Y-l-l-:96 THU
Catherine Petros
e,9237 FOR HAII€D RECTPTENT OHLY
303 -5e6-Os60
as9 47-a 23eq
p.3
P-o2
l lt ,t 'I
rR8 (Eo!tcr. rm'
iier w. {Gth Avenue, suit€ 14
Denver, CO 80211-23 38
"""""''ooo'/rnJ.tlirt
tj
Fax:303/4??-2580
Irab
Page:
No, r 109595
1of 2 client:
PfoJ ecc rD:4217
trerno I i Ee -Acts inoli t e
EOIIA& lsasSTOE lflellll
oBher Fiblous I'lagerlaLs :
vlsual esiimatlon!
1fAf 1fBl - ?:- 2 tAl
ioo 96
3 frace-s[
lfDr t
-L-
1;rcajlt llD' r
10 Lo 1q
g7 8q 90
individual layer analYses ) '
9Z
emos i Ce
AnthophYIlite
Chrysot,i le
Crocidol it.e
Fibrous Glass
celluloge
Synchet ics
Ogher:
?rac€ <L*
Nonfibrous ltaEerlal 90 90 -
r compos{Ee analysis (rrrultilayered salrqrle ' see
*r iID rneSns None DeEected.
A'ralysE :
rrc{rr..F t\t' !fiirtr -l dF?<{'r6{ F'lrPt l' -rrrlvFrF n!'
lF
oo?.lt?ttn l-ta!!!t lt{lltol
Cofrnbi!€ D8., Vall, CP' IblG 20
D.fc.nE sanple
i.t itot- DaEe Descri Dtion
,rirace 05/O9,106 lst' f logir ceilinq bV S 9,alr tlrl,i-rL' -"-
]lava|rgl
1 r4.l lorr g5/09/O6
1 fBr
-2-951lJ2J9n
2a Irlc!-05/!9L05
2 tAl lIDr r 05/09/06 lHhite drvua I I | -
tJralrrFct (pelcenEE decernined by
Sample Nunl2er: 1t
tdy6t P€8ci|rg r x00
Asbestos llinerals:
EanPl-e.-NuDber
Mark cooperrider
oace: O5LIV.0.f
Catherine Petnos
g.g.3-I FOR NgI|ED F.EC'P IE}I7 t)}|LY
3(t3-526 -O560
303 rl?? 25go
p.4
P- og lte€ 12 OB 12: 35P
. HAY-I1-96 fHU
l
:
:
$I[Dfe.-Nrqber
,t r1
Phone; 3O3/{77'2s59
800/386-3135
Fax: 303/4??-2580
ra8 GT0!ICS' t;E '14{1 w. 46ih Avenue, SulEe l4
Denver, col 40211-2338
Client: I
?rojecE IDl: l2l? 61rdt-o. 9E'r vrll' go' uBdt 20
0
Lab !lo. : 109595
Page: 2 of 2
D.8Caag sanple
llbrElar D3f.e Dsss.ill.ile
2 IBI 2 05/09/06 llthite Eexturel
100
AnthoP?ry IIi Ee ' Chr!.soEile
-3--Crocidol i.Eb
Trsflol ite-nctinol ite
tl0rtrt lfD8trO{t
---3--
IDfa
orher Fibious ldaterials r
Fibrous Gllass
Celluloae l
Syacbeticd Othe!: i
1O
Nonfibroud ttaEerial 98
' Corrpos.ite analysis {mrlcilayercd salple,a' XD neanig None Detesc€d.
eee individual larrer analyeeg )
.sl'|allrst: : .'
Mark googelrider
sarurle xunber t
tz.Yrt hag.ng t
I
Asbedtos F{iaerals:
A$6site I
Daee: 05lL1lQ.6
to 19?04765435 at 5l23l}5 5:22 N{ Pg 003/009 Fen
r{&Gi!.ynorlcr UNIT*7O version 6.i052 05115/06
OIJANTITY SURFACE/PRODUCT
c HtLtlPtS 3H1H
Ro 61" X 39 518"
c!.{ - l.H
- STATIONERY
: 00000001 ! GRIL}G/sDL: ?/8'RECT SDT. - TISPECER
es vrgnED Tf,B EXTERIOR
cctt-RE
RO 37i lt 55 5/8'! OUCIIE: 000 ! GRILLE,/SDL:
BAR
C HUITIPLE 3I{2'I
RO 61" tr 66 3/1"
ct,r - STATTO$ARY (3i
At{N . RC.TO OPERATIilG 13!! Q0048: 00000003 I GRIILE/SDLI ?/8" RECT SDI - $||SPACER
grWsrlrg
$1,040.25
9515.00
s2,049.73
cN 36 56
8" REST SDL - IIISPACER
AS VIEIIED PROI4 THts EIITERIOR
Fftfft
Version 5
OUENTITY
to 19?04?55435 at 5123106 6:22 Ntt Pg 004/009
PAGE 3
ro. . ciDn!' lclcr UNff * ZO 052 05/!5/46
SURFACE/PFODITT
D; Entry
I
E; Living
1
,/*est cc!{-
RO 33"
STATIONART
x 59 5/8.
C }'OLTIPLE 1II28
RO 37" X 65 3/44
CM-RH
AWN - STATIOI{ARY
! QU0TE: 00000004
! GLASS ADD: ?ntP
! GRILIE/SDL: 1/8'
BAR
- il,/SPACER
AS VIEIIED FROM IEE H(TERIOR
AS VIETED FROM TTE EXfERTOR
ION E II
RN T SDL
$1, 0{3. 25
s419.2s
32 50
n
ss,16?.50
s205. 70
$5, 3?4 - 20
SOB TTfAI,:
4.OOO* SAI,ES TAX:
SRO.'ECT TTEAI !,RICE:
TO TIIE SPEC.! DENOPES
/go tr
7/6
./'
..//aft. /
$7l'r{
Fron i to L97a4765435
j
I tfl & Cinsl'rf,I.t
6.r0s2 os /I5 / 06
aE 5l2tl06
Otrttar
bhlff dzo
6:22 ltl Pg 006/009
PAGE 2 versiso
OUANTITY J SURFACEIPRODUCT
ArUPsEairs. Option 1 C I,ITTI,TIPLE 3N2H sl, ?40.7-q
RO 61" X 39 5/8*
c!1 - sTA?rortARv ({)
cM - Lil
ct4 - RH ! QUSDE: 00000001 ! GRILLE/SDL: ?/8n REC! SDL - f/sPecER
EAR
AS YTENAD FROIT TITE EKTERIOR
B; Upstatrq
1j
i
I
Optlo:t
C M'I,TIPI,E ilgzE
RO 3?r X 5{ 3l{"
ENN . STATIOHARY
Cttl - RC
r QU(ItEr 0O00C002
! GRILLE,/SD! ! ?./8 d RECT sDL - IrlSPeCAR
BAR
9?02.00
s2,442.75
s97 .7L
S2, 5r10 . 45
AS WETED PROI{ TflE EI(TERIOR
s{rB fo|rAl.:
4t.000t SALES TAx!
PNff]BCT ?OTAT. PRICE:
DEI{OfES EXCEPTIONS TO THE SPEC.
TOWNOF V]\[ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
75 S.FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL. CO 81657
970-479-2138
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ELECTRICAL PERMIT Permit #: E06-0203
MQ -ot33
Job Address: 4247 COLUMBINE DR VAIL Status. . . : ISSUED
Location.....: 4247 COLUMBINE DRIVE, UNIT 20 Applied . . : 0912812W6
Parcel No...: 2l}ll22I4020 Issued . . : l0/0212N6
hoject No : -tRsoC -6o c( t Expires . .: O3l3ll2007
owNER FOWLER, TI{OIIAS W., ,JR 09/28/2006
VIRGINIA A. FOWI-,ER I,IVING TRUST'
2074 AI.,BION ST
DENYER co 80207
APPr-,ICANI NATTVE ELECTR.TC 09/28/2006 Phone: 970-328-1293
P.O. BOX 1807
EAGI,E
co 81631
License: ].43-F,
coNfRAcToR NATTVE Er-,ECTRTC 09/28/2006 Phone: 970-328-1293
P.O. BOX 1807
EAGI-,8
co 81631
Licenge: 143 -E
Desciption: ADD EXTERIOR LIGHTING. INSTALL GFI AND EXTERIOR ENTRY WALL
Valuation: $0.00 Square feet: lOm
Electrical----'- >
DRB Fee-------- >
Investigation-*- >
. wilt call----- >
TOTAL FEES- >
09/2e/2006 shahn
Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMEN|
$0. 00
s0.00
$3 .00
$s4 . ?s
FEE SUMMARY rr****lQrr'r.**'r++i.*****ii**{.ir'1(tri**1ir*+t,i*r.**++**,i*r.1.**********'t
Total Calculated Fe€s--> 554.'15
Additional Fees----- >$0.00
Total Permit Fee----> 554.75
Payments---------.-- > $54 . ?5
BALANCE DUE------ >$0.00
a ^nf^.,41o.
Item: 05000 EIJECIT.ICAIr DEPARTMENI Action: AP
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Cond: 12
(BL,DG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CI#CK FOR CODE COMPI-,IAI{CE.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot
plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply
with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this strucrure according to the towns zoning and zubdivision codes, design
review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOLIRS IN ADVANCEBY TELEPHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OIJR OFFICE FROM 8:OO AM - 4
PM.
,t******+*+** ****++********+**,t,t!t***,F****:i'i**********tt:t*+********,! * * {. {. ** ***,t*****{. *****,1.** * * *
TOWNOFVAIL. COLORADO Statement
.tii,*:r**+,t***'r:f ***********************+*****:t **1.***+**'tt**{.*:t *,t **+**+****{.+'t ,t {.r.{.{.**{rl.****'lr4.:1. * * t
Statement Number: R050001581 Amount: 554.75 L0/02/2Oo5I1 :08 AM
Pa)rment Meihod: Check Init: DDG
Notation: Native 5101
Permit No:
Parcel No:
Site Address:
Location:
This Paynent:
ACCOTINT ITEM LIST:
Account Code
EP 00L0000311r-L00
wc 00100003112800
806-0203
2IOL-L22-1402-O
4247 COI,UMBINE DR VAII,
4247 COIJVN'E INE DRIVE .
$s4.7s
Descript ion
Type: EIJECTRICAI PERMIT
UNTT 20
Total Fees:
Total AL,L Pmts :
Bal-ance:
pf+ . /J
$s4. zs
$o. oo
***********'t'l't *'t t *
'{.
!t **'l**'t 't *********************+********++:i*!t**++****+++****++*****++******
Current Pmts
ELECTRICAI PERMIT FEES
WIIJII CAIJL INSPECTION FEE
5r,.75
3 .00
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, Colorado 81657
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Contact Person and Phone #'s:'o/4ffi-gzslzt of.Vqil Reg, No.:
COMPLETE SQ. FOOTAGE FOR AREA OF WORK AND VALUATION OF WORK (Labor & Materials)
ELECTRICAL VALUATION: $AMOUNT OF SQ FT IN STRUCTURE:
Contact Assessorc Offtce at 97O-328-8640 or visit for Parcel #
Parcel #ZlOLtT? l4ozrl
rob Name: fr*te-o- lz$robAddress: Q-+7 touangnt vfftP
Legal DescripUon Lot:Block:Filing:Subdivision:
owners Name:l/l.k'61A4+4 ll Address: Zofi *titrtlt kqu a, ll
phone:
Engineer: ll Address:Phone:
Detailed description of work:
Ary enj."t- H&lr*, fr Ee"- 6rc N J e/Lr.dyqe-<
WorkClass: New() Addition( ) Remodefi(9 Repair( ) TempPower( ) Other( )
WorkType: InteriorJ-f Extenoyftz) Both ( )Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes ( ) No ( )
Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Duplex (-,) Multi-famif ( ) Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other ( )
No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: -=No. of Accommodation Units in this building:
Is this oermit for a hot tub: Yes ( ) No Q4
lToesEFire Spriltkler System Exist: Yes ( ) NoH
Parcel
*****************FOR OFFICE USE ONLY********'v****t(***********************..w;.ry.....
F:\cdev\K)RMS\PERMm\Building\electicalJermiLl 1-23-2005. DOC Page 1 of 2 tLl23l200s
!.,l'J:-e,..-t I
,t.. 1t*i
l"'-,tr ,,,* *",,",_,
o
o
Amendment to the 2002 N.E.C. Town of Vail Ordinance 4, Series of 2005
Overhead seruices are not allowed in the Town of Vail.
Underground services shall be in conduit (PVC) from the utility transformer to the electric meter, main
disconnect switch, and to the first electrical distribution circuit breaker panel.
The main disconnect switch shall be readily acrcsible, andlocated next to the meter on the exterior wall of
the structure. All underground conduits are required to be inspected beforc back-filling the trench.
In multi-famif dwelling units, no electrical wiring or feeder cables shall pass from one unit to another. Common
walls and spaces are exempt
NM Cable (Romex) can fu used only in single and multi-family dwellings net exceeding 3 stories,
Typ NItl annot be ured in any building mixd with Typ A,B.E FrHrI,M &S occupancies.
Alaminum conductorcsmaller than size #8 are not permitted with the Town of Vail,
, TOWN OF VAIL ELECTRICAL PERMIT GUIDELINES
All installations of exterior hot tubs or spa's require a DRB approval from planning. This application will
not be accepted without a copy of the DRB approval form attached (if applicable).
If this permit is for installation of an exterior hot tub or spa on a new elevated platform or deck over
30" above grade, you must also obtain a building permit.
If this permit is for installation of an exterior hot tub or spa on any existing deck or elevated platForm,
a structural engineer must review the existing condition and veriff that it will support the added
concentrated load. Please provide a copy of the structural engineers wet stamped letter or drawing
with this application.
If this is a remodel in a multi-ftmily buildipg with a homeowners association, a letter of permission
from the association is required.
If this permit is for a commercial space, two (2) sets of stamped drawings are required. Electrial
one-line and panel schedules are required if load is added or distribution is alfurcd.
I have read and underctand the above.
Signature Date Signed
If you have any questions regarding the above information or have additional questions,
please contact the Town of Vail Electrical Inspector at 97O-479-2L47 . The inspector can be
reached on Monday thru Friday mornings behrveen the hours of 8am and 9am. You may also
leave a voice maii and the inspector will call you back.
F:\cder\FORMS\PERMm\Buildi rE\electicalJermit_U-23-2005. DOC Page 2 of 2 ru23lzoos
TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
75 S. FRONTAGEROAD
vArL. co 81657
970-479-2138
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
PLUMBING PERMIT Permit #: P06-01ffi -Boq otrS
Job Address: 4247 COLUMBINE DR VAIL Status . . . : ISSUED
Location.....: 4247 COLUMBINE DRM, UNIT 20 Applied . . : Wl06l2W6
Parcel No...: 2lDll22l4020 Issued. . : Wl08/2W6
lrgal Description: ?A5e6-cot(,t Expires . .: 03lfinm7
hoject No :
owNER FOWLER, THOMAS W., iIR 09/06/2006
VTRGINTA A. FOWI,ER I,IVING TRUST
2074 ATBION ST
DEN\IER co 80207
APPLICAI{T CONCEPT MECHANICAL, INC 09/06/2006 Phone: 97O'949'02oA
P.O. BOX 1155
AVON
co 81620
License: 189-P
CONTRACTOR CONCEPT MECHANICAI,, INC 09/06/2006 Phone: 970-949-a20o
P.O. BOX 1155
AVON
co 81620
License: 189-P
Desciption: RECONNECT GAS LINE TO METER. RE-ROUGH ONE HOSE BIBB
Valuation: $600.00
Fireptace Infornation: Rcstrhted: ??# of Gas A@iances: ?? # of Gas Logs: 1? # of Wood Pallel ??
:i***+**!i&ra*{rl.**rr*r****f*+**+*d*****+*+a{.{d}r{(+rrtd(+**+{.f'r+i,*:rr***{l*:r.*** FEE SUMMARY
* *{.:*:t*:**,t*tr **:t*:t*)t***tiF**'**'}**tr(++rt+++rt+t ira+{r't+*i.*+{r'1.:}+'ti.:}l:1.
Plumbiry--> $15 . 00 Restuarant Plan Review- >50.00 Total Calculated Fees-- > $21.75
Plan Check--- >
hvestigation,>
Will Call---->
S3 .75 TOTAL FEES-._-> S2x. ?5 Additionat Feee---- >
$0.00
$3.00
Total Permit Fee------>
Payments----------- >
BALANCE DUE-----.- >
90.OO
$21 ,7s
s2L.7s
s0, 00
Item: 05100 BUILDfNG DEPARTMENr
09/06/2006 JS Action: AP
Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMEN:I
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
Cond: 12
(BI,DG.): FTEI-TD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CIIECK FOR CODE COMPI,IANCE.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full tlrc information required, completed an accurate plot ' plan, ard state that all ttre information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply
with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design
review approved, Intemational Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto.
RXQTJESTS FOR INSPE{TION SHALL 3E MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADV BY TELEPIIONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OLJR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4
PM.
TURE OF O CTOR FOR HMSELF AND OWNET
t-4-/
+**'b*'|f,+t'l*+,;**t*+*********+**********+*+***{t*********d.**+'1.{.+*+*****++***************t***+t+
TOWNOFVAIL. COLORADO Statement
******+*+****+*+*+t+****+*+****+**+*'t********:t:*:t*********f*f*1.'ll.*,rt*********d.+{.t,***f*{.*+*+*1.
,lnount | 527.75 09/08/2oo6L1 :34 AM
Init: DDG
Notation: Concept Mech
Staternent Nuniber r R050001399
Payment Method: Check
1016 8
Permit No:
Parce1 No:
Site Address :
Locati.on:
This Payment:
PF 00100003LI2300
PP 0 010 0 0 0311110 0
wc 00100003112800
P05 - 010?!ype: PIjJMBTNG PERMIT
2LO7-L22-!402-O
4247 COLUYBINE DR VAIL
424? COLIJMBINE DRIVE,
$21.7s
UNIT 20
TouaL Fees:
Total ALL Pmts :
Balance:
$2r.75
i2r.7s
$0.00 *{.****+*+*+*****#****+*+*+*******************+*****************************l.+*+*****+*{.**++*
ACCOUNT ITEM LTST:
Account Code Description eurrent Pmts
PLAN CHECK FEES
PI,IJI4BING PERMIT FEES
WII,IJ CAI'L INSPECTION FEE
3.75
15.00
3.00
APPU CATI ON WI LL NOT BE ACCEPTED I F I N@MPLETE OR UNSI GNED
?aq-o/o7
sEP 01 2006
Projec{ *, ---/!-8) 4l--=*E-
Building Perm it # : _1/a_a,::21j3
ilti?'llif,'il'J;"-,*Pc-4/o7
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, Colorado 81657
}::W):i"ne*',s'ffi.,@ Plumbing Ontrador:To,vn of Vail Reg. f.lo.:
E-llail Address:
V.P/ 5'
COMPLETE VALUATI ON FOR PLUMBI NG PERMI T (Labor & ilaterials)
PLTJMBITIG S b@.9
at 970-328-8610 or viit for
Parel# /19 t / ZZ /tto ZO
Job l€me: .2,to-t/(R Kz.s , J<.-t t",(&b Address: /2 q7 frrtl fi:;-Dzi
L.egal Description ll [ot: ll Block: ll Filing:Subdivision: Uil,furn /{/aa C<
owners M^Ytrrn * Eut/+,e llnaoress 4Z!,^f.'0-? ,S.o fl mone:
Brgineer: N/A. lruoress Phone:
Type of Bdg.: Snglefamif [/ Orpr"tf. t irtrlti-family ( ) tumm€rcial ( ) tueilaurant ( ) Other ( ),r-_!_
l,lo. of E<iding Drelling thrits in this buildingr. '-- ll frn. ot Accommodation thits in this building:ll
****t***il***:.*rt jt:t*******FOR OFFI CE USE ONLYi*ir***t***t*****t*i****'r*tt******:ri*
4-l
Date Recelved:
F:bd6AFORMS\PERMITSUOO5$lunbing_prmit]0o5.doc
*
In5DW'
19o-3?#ot In"p"t:,tF"dy??1fff"'ting t"n" o'
Requested Inspect Oate: Wednesday, OctobGr 10,2007
Ingpecition Area: JRM
Site Address: 4247 COLUMBINE DR vAlL
42rI7 COLUMBINE DRIVE. UNIT 20
A/P/D lnformation
Activitv: 806{133
Const Tvo6:
Ow?ier: FOWLER
A.BUILD t'otl88: 08"Status: ISSUED
Insp Area: JRM
Requested Time: 10:00 AM ' Phone: -or- 970-390€683
Entered Bv: DGOLDEN K
Conhactor:
Description:
Requ€sted Insoec{ion(s)
Item: 50
Item: 60
Item: 70
Item: 534
Item: 90
Phone: 970-476-5435
AND NEW WINDOWS: ROCK VENEER AND STUCCO
Item:
Reouestor:
Coniments:
Assioned To:- Action:
/ c'tt'"//
J *-'/k
n *'Approved "'Insoector: JRM'Action: AP
Action: AP
Action: AP
Action: AP
APPROVED
APPROVED
APPROVED
APPROVED
Nail. ._l Approved *
REPT131 Run Id: 7134
1%-9?#ot In=p"$:,T F?$lF?t nuf*ing t"n" tu
R€questgd Inspect 9ate: Tuesday, October o9, 2007 - lnsD€dtion Aroa: SH
Slte Address: 4247 COLUMBINE OR VAIL
4247 COLUMBINE ORIVE. UNIT 20
Requestor: NATIVE ELECTRIC
Comments: will call Peter 390-8683 AssignedTo: SHAHN
{Ptu \l t d+vv
Time Exp:
OK
Insoec{ion Hlstorv
Item: 110 ELEC-SeMce Item: '120 ELEC-Rouoh
- 10/03/06 Inspector: eS
Comment:Item: 130 ELEC-Conduit Item: 140 ELEC-Misc.Item: 190 ELEC-Final
B-ELEC SubTvDe: ADUP Status:U'se: Insp Area:
Requosted Time: 09:00 Alf ' Phone: 970-32&1293 -or- 97G90,F
6509
Entered By: OGOLOEN K
A/P/O Information
Activitv: E0G0203
Const Tvo6:Oniier: FOWLER
Contractorl
Description:
Reouested Insooc{ion(s)
Item: 190 ELEGFlnal
ISSUED
SH
Phone: 970-328-1293
INSTALL GFI AND EXTERIOR ENTRY WALL
Gtrt lo7'1,+L $ 1F/ hu^ fri,-,)
C'<-
Action: APCR APPROVED/CORRECTION REQD
REPTl31 Run Id: 7130
19n98o#07 In"p"$on B"fuFet Reeotting p"g" t+
Requestgd lnspect Date: TqesOay, October 09, 2007 ' Insoection Area: GG
Site Address: 4247 COLUMBINE DR VAIL
4247 GOLUttBtNE OR|VE, UNIT 20
A/P/D lnfornation
Reouested Insoec{lon(sl
Insoec{ion Historv
Item: 210 Item: 220 Item: 230 Item: 240
Comment: F(Item: 250 PLMB-PooUHot Item: 260 PLMB-Misc.Item: 290 PLMB-Final
)LMB SubTvDe: ASFR
U'se:
Phone: 970-9494200
RE-ROUGH ONE HOSE BIBB
Status: ISSUED
Insp Area: CG
Item:
Reouestor:
Coniments:
Assioned To:- Action:
Requ$ted Time: 08:30 All ' Phone: 970.949-0200
Entered By: DGOLDEN K
f,*gL
3 f--
,*fr Aonroved'* o.r,on, AP APPRoVED
UNITS 19/20 GAS AIR TEST 15#AIRTEST
REPT131 Run Id: 7130
--E
-
m Io i.- o
t--'. h E l<x :t!:t lm: 6 l9q 1
l! < :i
ljj; I l< -r t l "': m =t-r a J '<c I:
o.<
68 ;!L (io ctt >l VQ ;'i =_n
m
+
=PP
i==
YF t-
!Hffi
trtr!
o o z
@ {7 c c){o z
T
FT n
={
-n -o
O r--
z=
2=o"z
q,z lq mil
l,
ta ,^l-o
16<l-o | 'Tl
\o ro 3$
=-t
-.1
@ m x
m
-{
z (-
(D
U'
-l m
ro
tr{F v)z
H H ok t--- -*
Ltt et
+--
rTl
(-
z
m
or-
3Ui o>'r
-n
=z
H
ti
P I|.l
l14 IF IF t>le)
l-
li.J
I
z H ri
a
z
H H
H
z
e P F
t1
lz lz IH IF
l(n l(n
I'
N
o\
I
I
N)(rl
f.J lJl
2n -{m nz >m OI -t>or-
o I
=m
-{
m o f
z
z
--t
-l
o
\J -O z.r -.t c ?=6o tz
z I
-t
2 ..\
an
!
€z ttl F
(F
H
E-
l+
l=
lz lo
t:t>l-
lm
lp lz lo
I
l*ls.Itn ll l(r:
I
s.{
Or
I lJ
tJ
T
F
rd
ql
H z
z
N
N)
n H z z H
..^.
z z
a 3
li
_p
I
I (Jl
f.J
I
=
l.rll
H F B
z
IJ to t:
lz lo
l-n t<
IP
lm
P lz
le
I l*l(,15.ll It!
I
I
s..{
o\
I
l.J ._j
N
l-r to
l€
lz lo p
l>l-
ln lz
l-i lo
l€
lz
l-n t<l>l-l:0 lm
lo
l6
{ l-{mlo 5t€'12 lo
t;
l;
l$lz
l"
I
I
I
I
aro-@O-r a3s o!-at f o ct e x'\<o ii or Q^-O q=F
'<Q{{Eo-'
i *t'
o:.J
-.o gt
=+-
-orf -f$;- <
=o)o ^f-X o.o
od=
!+('sgs
E oto
0r -i'F +;i
io-'v =.:
?rf(D .-D o.-<-
=-
=9I s,dr =s.P :tR=
ts=
o-f
B=l
d s+8 a'3
ER6
-i -(,o=.
llg tH --lF sg 12 09 l,_ € ,t;: !) f l- Eo
13 d6 " f s ii c.
, r-d tg
I oqt
leE I =,-
l6o,I o8 \l o o \6+&:\*E
s#,
I r3-rF€ d
r\.h=.\\Y
\:ro , \o f \NE3 Y f cr e e?- -c, (,
=6 \-g:
i6' o +*69
*a Ygt
(o'
+
T
+
+
T
o--t
H
!f
3i
sl zl ml
3+rl
RI
=l ql
ol ltl
'l ol rl rl
<l ol ml t-l ''Il
-t I m
o :z m
lo l<
I
I
I
I !i X i
I
I
li la z l"
I
I
I
I
I
L_
I
@ -
I z
X
o l
z
t-
!
m
=i
U)z m m
m
l<
lz
l=_
ir-
:r
c
i
l*
i-
TO !€
=4
'z
=
tl
I
I
z>oR
Ici d:
>o ol m:aa z q z
-.1
I
I l1
z m €
--t
m
-l
z
=z
X
>4
m
I z i
'It
m
o
.n
c
z
v)ll F
H
t4
C)Nts
222 anx;! !.1 ri P io ->n Xzc)
(, \'l \J a)'<z vOq
Io 64
^Z c:zq
'n22
€
n<
N
-t 4
--a
i I {
J
,q
-.i
t)-l {
i\
I
'F o\
t
t-
I
I
z z a
9o
@
7
2 o z
{m (t
z z
=z 6 -{a
-.t
u
m
gl
g=:
F+l
'(5 r
sFi
5l
I
I
I
I
I
el
a)""(Hlr
r. l,6,,
-l'\o r\\o l\
3 ,-t -
E
i
x
{
-t -l
x r,
){
o
-1
l--I
m f,l
=TI m m
U>
o
m
+
x
.)
m
z
c I'
m
!
tn
o 2
m
m {
m
m
-.t
o z
m
m
m
z
c
g z
m
m o --{
o
t-
z o r
tTl
x
g
o 2
m
=
m v
=
='tl
m m (t
VALUATION
T rn a
=z
=m o
z
t-
=g z
m f-m
E |-
z
5 UJ
f.J u l.J s.s.s.o\\)
\$ -x\$\\$
-,-
o o z
2 v c
9 o z
!FI a
={
I
tn
R ld
h
B rl e,a O -1
DX m=.
=
2 I
t\.'9*z
7
t
{
t e
-t
{o o m !
m
C,o c
8 3
F q
m t !o !
-a o
6
@ c
2 o m o .tl
!m !
=
{
!tn o 'll
!m a 3
nnRl
=FP\xLn- |Yc)f I ,v= |
= (, 6, I !, tr I
'l
I
l-J t-l l-l
EE >=cr@ >z 6o z
,
b (D
2
=IT
F
ir\r.
E
b
B J c
Eq o
s ':-:
-r
n-
!I
F
:
!!
;d
(lr
N
r ;.l:/ )l\
l,1F
OPr a Ei F Eo E As , c, .tl ;; c 6 oo o !22
5
?
^t0!=S n=I I:io<-
X
i!I
!
5 l o
ll tl
ot
;l
:l
el 2l |nl (tl
3l
FI
'l
I
o o
6 2
!m t
=at z m n o tn o l<"
lz
l=
l-a
t>
o 2
o 2
F tn !
!
iiIEE
EEiEi
a o
75 south lrontage road
Yail. colorado 81657
(303) 479,2138
(3031 479-2139
oflice ol community development
Plaa Review Based orr the 1988 Unif,oru Codes
PROJECT NUI'IBER: ].01890
ADDRESS: UNIT #20
BTGHORN TERRACE
OCCUPANCY: R-3
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N
DRB APPROVAL REQUIRED: YES
NAME: NII,SSON ADDITION
DATE: OCTOBER L9. 1990
CONTRACTOR: OWNER
ARCHITECT: GEORGE FEINI,IAN
ENGINEER: SAME
PISNS EXAMINER: MICHAEL WHITAKER
coRRECIIONS RE9SIRED
Tbe itens listed below are rot inteaded to be a coeplete listing of all possible code r€guireuents in the adopteil codes. It is a gUide to selected sections of, tbe codes. Tbe following ls not to be construed to be an approval of alry violatioa of any of tbe pro-visioas of the adopted codes or auy ordinance ot tbe Iova of Vitl .
Design loads reguired: 80 tb. per sg. ft. snow load and
100 lb. Iive load for decks.
Insulated floor of addition with vapor barrier to inside of living area.
All electrical work to be completed as per 1987 National Electrical Code.
Glazing in hazardous areas to be safety glazing as per UBC
5406.
Pad required under piers. Minimum size 2+ttK24rr with 2 #4 bars each way and 2 doweLs to pier.
Option as noted on prints for pier locations/rin joist configuration. Regardless, additional pad reguired at junction of interior double 2X10 and rin as notadd.
Fie1d verify all frane connections.
L.
2.
3.
4.
3.
6.
7.
DA/ONID SERVCES, iNc
2111 N Fronioge Rd
Voil, Colorodo 81657
(3O3) 476-6272
PROPOSAL
TO: JOHN NILSSON
P.O. BOX 1056 vAIL, CO 81658
ocToBER 24, L990
JOB: 4247 COLUIIBINE DR. #20, EAST VAIL
PLANS PREPARED BY: DISCUSSION LIITH JoHN NILSSON & SITE
iNSPECTION
DOUBLE DIAMOND SERVICES, INC. PROPOSES TO FURNISH THE LABOR AND
MATERIAL TO COHPLETE THE FOLLOWING ELECTR]CAL INSTALLATIONS
ACCORDING TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED FOR BID.
1. CONVER? EXISTING ELECTRICAL OVERHEAD SERVICE TO
UNDERGROUND.
2,. THE SERVICE WILL TERMINATE UP THE EXiSTING POLE AND
CONNECT TO EXISTING OVERHEAD DITRIBUTION LINES.
DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY CABLE T.V. LINES OR TELEPHONE LINES.
DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY EXCAVATING WORK.
DOES NOT INCLUDE ELEC?RICAL PERMIT FEE. WHICH SHOULD BE
INCLUDED IN THE EUILDING PERMIT.
CONTINUED ON PAGE
JOBg 4247 COLVI{BINE DR. {tzO' EAST VAIL
THE AEOVE TO EE CO}IPLETED IN A WORKMAN LIKE MANNER, ACCORDING TO
THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND APPROPRIATE LOCAL CODES FOR THE
SUM OF TWO THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS. (S2,Z5O.OO). TO
BE PAID AS FOLLOWS, UPON COMPLETION
THIS PRICE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE IF THIS PROPOSAL
IS NOT ACCEPTED IIITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE.
ANY ALTERATION OR DEV]ATION FRO}T THE AEOVE SPECIFICATIONS WILI,, EE
EXECUTED ONLY UPON WRITTEN ORDERS AND }JILL BECOME AN EXTRA CHARGE
TO THE CONTRACT PRICE.
PRE_EXISTING, NON-CONFORMING CONDITIONS THAT ARE NOT CALLED OUT
SPECIFICALLY IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT BE THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF DDS,INC.
DDS, INC. SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DELAYS DUE TO LABOR
SHORTAGES OR DiSPUTES, ACCIDENTS, MATERIAL SHORTAGES, INCLEMENT
I{EATHER OR ROAD CLOSURES.
A SERVICE CHARGE OF T}TO PERCENT PER MONTH WILL BE ADDED TO AI,L
ACCOUNTS MORE THAN THIRTY DAYS PAST DUE. IN THE EVENT OF A
DISPUTE OVER THE AMOUNTS DUE THE NON-PREVAILING PARTY WILL BE
LIABLE FOR THE PREVAILING PARTIES' REASONABLE COSTS RESULTING
FROM THE DISPUTE.
TFULLY SUBUITTED,
DIII\'l]\D SERVCES iNC
2111 N Frontoge Rd.
Voil, Colorodo B165/
(3C3) 476-6272
PAGE 2
.4 'ffi-,--a'^z<
i DIAMOND SERVICES, INC.
ACCEPTED BY:
TITLE:
DOUBLE
FOR:
DATE:r 990
nci. -.,
Avcr, i'
\../-r -.' rb *
.l
PROPOSAT ond CONTRACT
Dace 10/90 19
TO JOHN NILSSON
JOB
Dear Sir:
I propose co furnish all marerials and perform all labor necessary ro complete the following:
PUT IN NEW UNDERGROUND SERVTCE TO REPLACE OVERHEAD
2" PBC FROM METER TO TOP OF POLE WTTH WEATHERHEAD T
TNCLUDE PERMIT TAKE DOWN OVERHEAD LINE
BACK F LL TO BE Y OWNER
All of the above work to be completed in a substantial and workmanlike maoner according to strn&
ard practices for the sum of Dollars (t ?,000 )
Payments to be made s 1,000 DOWN BALANCE UPON FINAL INSP.
as rhe work progrcsses
Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications involving extra cost of materiel or labor will only be executed upon written orders for same, and will become an extra'charge over the sum men-tioned in this concract. All agreemenrs musr be made in writing.
to the value of
amount of contract to be oaid within
You are hereby aurhorized to
tioned in the above proposal, for
said proposal, and according ro rhe
ACCEPTED
Per cent (- %) of al| work complered, Thc cnrire
days a fter complction.
Respectfully su bmitted,
By
ACCEPTANC
furnish all materials and
which
terms thereof.
labor required to complete the work mcn-
the amount menrioned in
Date
AIONER FORM NO. I5{'7
19
agree ro Pay
atttrttD tt{ ula
PROPOSA1 ond CONTRACI
Date L0/90 ,19
TO JOHN NILSSON
JOB
Dear Sit:
I propose to furnish all materials and perform all labor nccessary to complete the folloring:
TO PUT I UNDERGROUND SERVTCE REPLA v
2" P FR ITIETER TO TOP OF POLE WTTH WEA AD
INCL DE ERMIT TAKE DOWN OVERHEAD LI
BACK FILL NE BY
All of the above work to be completed in a substantial and workmanlike manner according to eteo&
ard practices for the sum of
Payments to be made $ 1,00LDOWN BALANCE UPON FrNAL INSP.
Dollars 1$ ?1000 I
as the work progresses
Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications involving extra cost of mgterial or 6bor will only be executed upon written orders fot same, and will bccome an cxtri'charge over lhc sum nco-
tioned in this contract. All agreements musr be made in wriring.
to the value of
amount of contract to be oaid within
. You are hereby auchorized co
tioned in the above proposal, for
said proposal, and according to the
ACCEPTFI)
per cent (- %) of. all work completcd. The cntire
days after complcrion.
Respectfully su brnitted,
By
furnish
CCEPTANC
all materials and
E
labor requircd co complete thc vork mcn-
agree ro pay rhe amounr mcntioned in which
terms thereof.
D are
ATqNER FOfi t{O. 66{rr
r9
rirxTto rt uta
Present Floor Plan
t
I
I
E'0'
I
I
I
i
aA
F}o :t
sr R o
+
I
!t
I
Y
5'2'
I
/.f I r,r,/-/ ,' ,/ I'\.-r-;_ .-)L'/.)l I
i\!
Scale 1/{" .l'
,J
Present Building South Viev
I
r1
E'0'
Board &Br
Siding
E'0'
I
I
+
-r
J --*
Cantilevered deck
Present e.ritirg East View
:
t
Scale l/4" - I'
B'0'
I
I
I
I I
E'0'-+4'4'--+5'2'--+
lfhdov to be removed and space left as val&through from
sew ldditios to kitcheo.
Floor
o
Framing
,:':,:::,:,.'::,,,:,,,,ll,0ouble 2X I 0 :,:,:':,i,:,;,:,:,:,i
;,:::.:::::::.::::::::::: :.:.:::.:.:::::::::::l:.:l:,:1.::, 2X I 0 Rin Board vith:
a
\,'
D ATE '/
Double 2Xl0 Flush
o
Rim
Double 2Xl0 Rin Flusfran
Scale: 1/2" - I'
cata "
The iss':.j | :e ol
:"?tjl5::1..1 T? Jl,pll n s;. s ceci i,.riioni r-" c oi 1,,
j -;, ii riorr -,
i:j,fl,:f ':jn:,*ldlls -:ll'll rr.o, l,o,.rit,, .;n ;; ;;lr-?i: j
:illTl,* 0f orrors in"'iil- iirnr,"'ril,;il1;;,"':;,j"n*lJi'
, vF.vrvt,,lrgf tl'.',., .'
^burjo Heallh Flre
J
,(
,_
rl
i
i'.,.'"
ll
o )-o
2XlO Facia to Metcb Eristilg Buildiag
l0'overhaog
,nL/-
Roof Franing
13"
Liae of Euilding
Bslov
Scale l/{".1'
j
U
t
-?lufif9h+
,-ttnrl6Rfim
^
A
I tt'l'
I
s?'
I
//,a-/
ilad fr6T FtM
fian
I
8b'
Scrus t/4". t "
o
Nev Buildtng South Yiew o
l,t
ll
0'
l'xtl t( ll [t
t'
I
5'
0'
I
E'0'
I
I
V
I
0'
I
I
lr
Storage Shed
Glassblq
I
i
0'
I
I
Storage Shed
,, nrl
)tt,-/A i*r|^
10" pier vith {(four) *4 rebar d' '
Scale l/4" -1'
Neu, gt ding East Vieui
F'n'
I
I il
8'0'-r<-4'4'->+5'2'+
Keep eristing 2f i0 floor ioists aod replace
rim wirh double 2X12's
6
s)o F
E
{
E
F o
o t
&Batteq to March
10" pier vith 4 four) * { rebar
Scele l/{" = l'
Present Floor Plan
+
I
I
a'0'
I
I
I
t
I t
4
I
o
aa F o rt
Fl F o
t
I 44'
I t
q'r'
I
I
?
Scale l/.('.1'
o
Present Building South Yiev
a'7-
o
t+,l
6'0-
Board &Ba
Siditrg
TT
B 0'8',0'
I
I
I
+
r J-€
Cantilevered deck
o
Present Builcling East View I
I
E' 0'---+ 4 4' +<- 5' 2' ---r
Wiadocr to be reooved aod space left as valtthrough from
new addition to kitchen.
Scale l/{" - I'
.,tI\a
7bL
,va r lv'"
-- 9'o'lp
'--""-'--
bt+b
,ci \-,-
\%4-
-'),+
----
lsb
a o
r-- la'{a
jb+
<o,?--id
r lb'b
'/q "- t'
a(D ":t-
€eoeont
Tle.wn
SCanlD FLocR *'7,ff c?ff
DtprIN
'Aootn
'-, i[f
JT'.fl
Llulil6Roor11
t1.\'1
T
4\"
I
stzu
I
t,
'zq b '-7{4t.tf
--^;''%E r:b,1 ;|
"'6frry+ b+
lorrlloo"t:b1A,(
39 e-?
bVl" )
Ec*llr''e SHeD
$
?0 I
.@\'a:t
S,AA t/4,'. I ,.
ilea rffi^Fm-
l.
,/t^
:: - j,-,9';;raii i-,i .r-r i;.-..r Ur:.- ., lLg d l.r. I '-liiicirl 0f, . ry !,itiilii0n 01 any 0f the pr0visi0;rs ul r.,,! t:{,",.r
oi oi any other ordinance of the lurisdication. The issuence ol
a porrnlt bas8d upon plans, specifications and other data shall
not prevent the building official from thereafter rcquiring the
corrcction 0f errors in uid plans, specilicalions and oth&
data. ",t
DATE: lttR//ft t / l"
,
At youn request I have rev j.e*ed the floor franing and foundation design of your proposed addltion. This ls a sumnary of ny findings.
You can avoid addi.ng an additional pier along the rrrest side of this rerqodel
by using a tciple Zt10 rim bean spanning the fuil l1'.
I have found that the south pier at the uest side and the east pier on the
north side are capable of carrying the ioad r,rithout ihe neces:ity of a pad.
Houever, the corner pier and the one just east of this corner on the north
side uiII require the addition of a 2' x ?' * 8" pad beneath thenr. Provide
3 *4 rebar each uay in th€se pads and lwa *4 douels frolr them lnto the picr.
These douels should have an 18" vertical leg and an B' hortzontal leg.
Please give me a call if you have any questions regarding thir matter.
Tinothy
Pres i dent
of Vall Cornmrlrllf
Development
Eulld Hoallh
/'W/ tr
trtr
Tewn
FFr
tf boyle engineering, i.ff
professionol struciurol e ginee$
tr
E
0ctober 2S, 19S0
l'lr. John Nilsson
P.0. Box 1056
Vail, Colorado 81658
Subject: Ni l sson Addition
Biqhorn Temace Lot *?0
Uai I, Co lorado
Oear John,
INC.
,f 43 e. meodo,rr dr., suite 390 o crossroocls shopping cerrter . voil. colo'odo 8'1657 o 303/4762170
I ir 'i'.INSPECTION REQUEST . trqwN oF vArL
lit ! I l lt ,
PERMIT NUMBER OF
DATE
PROJECT l, I .- ,-_
JOBNAME IJ 1I)
INSPECTION:MON TUES WED THUR FRI AM PM READY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILOING: PLUMBING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL tr UNDERGROUND
BTOUNDATION / STEE_
D FRAMING tr ROUGH i WATER
- ROOF & SHEEB ' PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
D INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
D SHEETROCK NAIL tr
I D
tr FINAL D FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
D
tr
tr
ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
D
D FINAL tr FINAL
D APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
D DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
]
-INSPECTION TOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJE \|\ci -,r DATE i -r v JOB NAME
CALLER
WED THUR Tnl READY FOR
LOCATION:
AM roN:PECT ar INS
i+
ff APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
NUMBER OF PROJECT
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
1 ., E UNDERGROUND
D ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH i WATER
_ ROOF & SHEER
"-PLYWOOD NAILING
o
D
D
D
D
GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL i H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr
tr
o
ROUGH tr
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
DATE INSPECTOR
? o-'r :;iT*:: "''fo*|.3)
PEBMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
oare /t //d Joa NnMe
READY FOR
LOCATION:
MON
CALLER
TUES
^-) '-)LZ_ /
A/, lst o ,'-7 .(/ , T,'o
INSTBTIoN TOWN OF
I
REQUEST
VAIL
WED -@ FRI (L(".nb PM AM
Bt
tr
tr
!.J
D
tr
tr
E
ILDlNG:PL
tr
o
tr
o
tr
o
tr
UMBING:
FOOTINGS / STEEL UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
E TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH D
tr
U
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
I v/^ Y \/ V/ t -J
PERMIT NUMBER OF PFOJECT
DATE { t!;; >Fl / JoB
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL 'i-"I I r.) 014
. )"1 ,, I') '1,'-'oN NAME
CALLER
READY FOR INSPECTION: fVTOT.I ) TUES WED THUR AM PM
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS i STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D,W,V.
O ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEE-
tr FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
D SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL
MECHANICAL:
O TEMP. POWER -O HEATING
ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL tr FINAL
[neenoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REQUIRED
,o-,, f zb ///
rNSPEcroR
iiii:-! " .r
lNs
.-.I
PECTION _ Jo\u! oF
/ t,4-L.4,-:)
REQUEST
VAIL
i.,-_-_
PERMTT NUMBER 9:l PROJECT
i r / I .^
ottE t' ,/9.l , J,NAME
CALLER
READY FOR INSPECTION:MON TUES WED THUR . FRI AM PM
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
E FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
D
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH i D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER .d rRRvttttc
!
tr
ROOF & SHEEB
PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
INSULATION POOL i H. TUB
O SHEETROCK NAIL
tr
tr FINAL D FINAL
ELECTRlCAL:
D TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr
D
o
tr
HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
Rffissoe
/i u< t
"'rL/ i r
PERMIT NUMB
INSPECTION REQUEST
VAIL
oorc ll
CT
JO NAME
TOWN OF /; ,// +-L'.d 4|.UJ^*
CALLER
E noJ
..1 q
READY FOR INSPEC
LOCATION:
ES, wED'..IHUR
t.( . t1'1.
MON ( .rrt,
'<-*---"/')
AM
ii/tr APPRCVED
, CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNOERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
O FINAL tr FINAL
tr HEATING
O EXHAUST HOODS
EI SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
DATE INSPECTOR
I I
PE 'ii lrt-CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL E\J I
\
t,a-\'.t
rNs
.,q ..:JOB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTtoN;, .-\.$o*
CALLER
- \ TUES WFD THUFI -PM AM FRI
BUILDING:PL
tr
tr
D
tr
tr
tr
tr
UMBING:
D
u
FOOTINGS / STEEL UNDEFGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER
FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
,_ ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
DI {i NSULATION POOL / H. TUB
HEETROCK NAIL
tr
D FINAL O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr
tr
tr
tr
HEATING
D ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS
D CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
o
tr FINAL tr FINAL
R;'-*;tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
Tbe lterns belos
glvtng a pernlt
Please check off
FINAL PLUUBINE
NAI, INSPECTIONIS
aeed to be conplete
a flnal C of O.
Ln the box provlded.
COMPLE?SD
before
l
DATE!
FINAL !'IECHANICAJ.
DATE:
IMPROVEI{ENT SURVEY RXSID. NAUE!
[l FINAL ELECTRICAL
DATE:
FINAL BUILDING EAST SIDE:IIEST SIDE:
TEMPORARY C OF O
DATE:
DATE:'' <Q-z-'CERTIFI OF OCCI'PAI{CY
LAT.{DSCAPINC I}I'E T
DATE:
FILE NA}IE:
Proiect Application
Date 'l'l I
Proiect Name: l\JU \/&4^--/
proiecr Descrip r,.^, 71F A d.drl h e'u'----
Contacl Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
ne-
Architeel, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot
Com ments:
I
I
I
Design Review Board
Date
APPROVAL D ISAPPROVAL
Dale:
Town Planner D statt Approval
i:.f.git#,
o o
I
a
V *" -. . ) i'rj1
()i '" z
tu I 'r-'" A.t{l€,,(-Planning and Environmental cornrnissiorii v - v1-\' \ rr
,t, , ', rl: '",11 1 1r 1\ 1( / ;r r't f
con:nunity Deveropment Department -'t',t:1_'i ",', f . '',i',,,, ,{d1::
June 25, 1990 '.': r, li ;.t t,/ir' (1\" '''(l " -:t"n 1 - ,L:\t l'"P r'"1\ ie, '''. -l'a tu'.
A request for a side and rear setba-cr vfiiiinces to the- r;
tledium Density uulti-fanily zone district on L'ot 20, ;Bighorn Terrace (4247 Colurnbine Way) -<
,d,Applicant: John and Enid Nilsson (,,, t\.rt {t I C( t ) [-r-l '!.J 4 ,ra;
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUR]ECT:
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE VARTANCE REOUESTED
The applicant is the owner of Unit 2o in the Bighorn Terrace
subdivlsion which is located on Columbine Way. The existing
duplex unit consists of approxinately 706 sq. ft. of GRFA
and has an allowed GRFA of 659 sq. ft. under l{ediurn Density
Multi-Family (UDMF) zoning.
The applicant is reguesting a variance from the 20 ft. side
and rear setback reguirement to allow for the construction
of a 101.25 sq. ft. addition on the north side of the
building. The addition will involve adding a 81.25 sq. ft.
dining area and a 20 sg.ft. storage area on the rear of the
buildinq. The variance request Ls for an 11 ft.
encroachment Lnto the 20 ft. rear setback and a 15 ft.
encroachnrent in to the 20 ft. side yard setback.
II. BACKGROUND
Bighorn Terrace is a nonconforning subdivision because it
wai annexed into the Town and zoned MDMF after It waE
established. Under the MDMF zoning, 20 ft. setbacks on the
front, rear and sides were imposed on the existing lots.
Unit 20 currently encroaches 8 ft. into the rear eetback and
12 ft. into the side setback at the second level . These
imposed setbacks greatly linlt the locations of possible
additions whicb would not require setback variances. The
appJ.icant has also applied for additional GRFA (250 sq. ft. )
unaer Section 18.71.020 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
a
Recentty, both the PEc and the Town Council have reviewed a
setback request for Unit 7 located in this same subdivision.
In addition to the setback variance, the applicant also
received approval for an additional 250 sq. ft. of GRFA as
altowed under Section 18.?1.o2o of the vail Municipal Code.
The staff recommended denial of the varj.ance request on the
basis that the variance would be a grant of special privilege in that there are no exceptions or extraordinary
circurnstances or conditions applicable to the same site of
the variance that do not apply generally to other properties
in the same zone district. However, the PEC approved the
request by a vote of 7-o stating that indeed the applled
MDMF Zoning nas a hardship for this property. The PEC also
commented that the addition made sense in this location
since 31r would renain between buildings after the addition.
The Town council also reviewed this iten and approved it by
a vote of 6-0 slting again the hardship being the imposed
zoning. They directed the Planning Staff to investigate
zoning code changes that would take into account the unique
situation in relation to the setback in the Bighorn Terrace
Subdivision. This reconmendation is based on a review of
previous variances and the desire to naintain a reasonable
distance between buildings.
The staff has not yet amended the code, however we have made
a prelirninary decision that would allow for 7.5 ft. setback
requirements and that would thus insure a minimum distance
between buildings of 15 feet. Most of the units already
encroach into the setbacks and are situated at various
angles on each Iot. Each unit normally has a party wall but
is actually located on a separate lot' It may also be
appropriale to reduce, if not eliminate, the setback frorn
the intllr\or property line i.e. party wall. Staff believes
this approach treat property owners fairly regardless of
when they decide to expand and insures a reasonable amount
of separation between units.
we also discussed the option of reguiring a rninimum distance
between buildings. It was decided that this requirement
favored property ohtners that expanded first and made it difficult for adjacent properties to expand in the future.
III. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review ef Criteria and Findings, section 18.62.060 of
the VaiI Uunr-rpal Code, the Departuent of Comnunity
Developrnent recommends denial of the requested variance
based upon the following factors:
A. Consideratlon of Factors:
1. The relationshin of the requested variance to
other existing or potential uses and structures in
the vicinitv.
The 101.25 sq. ft. addition in the proposed
location should not create any problems to existing or potential uses or structure in the
vicinity. The property nost likely to be inpacted
would be Lot 15 to the rear and lot 21 to the
west. The existing building encroaches 8' into
the 20 ft. rear setback and is approximately 22 ft. from unlt 15 to the rear. It encroaches 12 ft. into the side setback at the second level and is approxinately 17 ft. fron Unit 21 to ttre west.
The reguested variance will allow the corner of
the proposed first story addition to be within 9
ft. of the rear property line and 5 ft. of the
west property line. The resulting distance
between buildings would be 19 ft. between unit 15
and 20. There would be no slgnificant change in
the distance between units 21 and 20. rj{,r ii.u^.,!i da 'tutl'
literal interpretation and enforcement of a
specified recrulation is necessarv to achieve
compatibilitv and uniforrnitv of treatment amonq
sites in the vicinitv or to attain the obiectives
of this title without arant of srrecial privilege-
The lot is greatly tiurited by the inposed
setbacks. However, the staff feels that the
proposed addition will not naintain the mininum
letback of '7.5 ft. that the staff is recommending
as a guideline.
Over the past 13 years there have been 9 requests
for setback variances in the Bighorn Terrace
Subdivision. of the 9, 4 have been reconmended
for denial and aII have been subsequently approved
by the PEc. The foltowing details the activity in
this area:
2.
VARIANCE REQUEST HISTORY OF BIGHORN TERRACE SUBDIVISION
TYPE OF N{OUNT OF STAFF PEC
DATE APPLICA}flT REOUEST VARTANCE RECOUUENDATION ACTION
Ylar 77 Benysh
May 78 Rowe
July 78 Alder
Aug 78 TurnbuLl
Aug 80 Curfman
Aug 82 Odum
Sept 82 odurn
GRFA
Setback
GRFA 473
setback
GRFA
Setback
Setback
GRFA L77
GRFA L22
Setback
Setback 18 for airlock
130 sq. ft.8 ft.
sq. ft.7.5 ft.
75 sq. ft.8 ft.
7 tt.
sg. ft.
sq. ft.
18 ft.
ft.
Approval
Approval
Denial
DeniaI
DeniaI
DeniaI
Approval
DeniaI
DeniaI
Approval
Approval
Denial
Denial
DeniaI
Approval
Denial
Approval
DeniaI
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
TabIed
TabIed
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Denial*
Approval
APproved*t'
Nov 83
Feb 85
June 85
Houston
Sherr
Nicholson
GRFA 80 sq. ft.
Setback 16 ft.
GRFA 50 sg. ft.3 setbacks 3, Xl, 13 ft.
GRFA 395 sg. ft.
Setback (adding 3rd floor)
Setback 15 feet rear
13 feet side
April 90 Benysh
**
The applicant nodified the application to conform to the requirernents
of Section L8.7L.O2O and received an allowance for an additional 250
sq. ft. of GRFA.
Received allowance for allowance 250 sq. ft. under Section L8.71.O20.
The effect of the recruested variance on ligrht and
aLr, distribution of nopulation, transportation
and traffic facllities. public facilities and
utilities, and public safetr,
3.
Staff finds that the request will not have any
significant effect uPon any of the above
consideratLons.
IV. FINDINGS
The Plannincr and Environnental Conmission shall nake the
followino findinqs before qrantinct a variance:
A. That the granting of the variance sill not constitute a
grant of special privilege inconsistent wlth the
linitations on other properties classified in the sane district.
B. That the granting of the variance will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or
nateriatly injurious to properties or inprovenents in
the vicinity.
C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the
following reasons:
1. The strict literal interlrretation or enforcenent of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this
title.
2. There are exceptions or extraordinary
circurnstances or condltions applicable to the same
site of the varl-ance that do not aPply generally
to other properties in the same zone.
3. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the
specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the sane district.
o
v.STAFF RECOI-II{ENDATION
staff recomnendation is for denial of the request for a 15
ft. encroachment into the 20 ft. side setback reguirement
and Ll ft. encroachment into the 20 ft. rear setback
ieeuiienent. Staff acknowledges that other properties int
he Bighorn Terrace Subdivision have recej-ved setback
variaices and therefore this variance reguest is not a grant
of special privilege. The.staff feels that although there
ar" L*"epti-ons or ixtraordinary conditions applicable to Lot
20 which do not generally apPli to other PllPerties in the
"ir" "or" distri6t, a niirinun setback should be maintained
in order to guarantee a minimum distance between buildings
io insure pt Efi" health, safety, and welfare as well as the
fair treatnent of all pioperty ouners within Bighorn
Terrace. The proposea-aa-aition will encroach 15 ft. into
the side setbaLk wtrictr is not an acceptable rnininrurn to the
staff. If in fact the PEc approves the variance requests,
the staff feefs it is appropiiate to require the applicant
io-ntta"rground their etlltrical service frorn the service
pole to unit 20.
i.t!-tiT :S
ig"ls'40" E
)w,-
|J'h
tr)
qj
u)
:
o
C\J
\f
C\
o
to
cr)
a o
ai
trJ
o N
v o
o
o)$
a
:lr'icj j-
.i,'i.'-: .!-;jjj
'ffiy Tiirt uo')
+W o cortrutTeu-f ffi?',Jl,ffi tt{__*er,zaz_
u)
trl v
a
t
PI,AI{NING AND ENVIRONI.TEMAL COMMISSION
JttNE 25, 1990
Present
Chuck Crist
Diana Donovan
Ludsig Kurz Jin Shearer
Kathy l{arren
Dalton WilIians
staff Kristan Pritz l{ike }lollica sbelly Mello
Andy Knudtsen
Penny Perry
l,[embers Absent
Connie lhight
In the lnterest of time, work sessionE sere held prLor to the public lrearing beginning at 12:40 p.n.
A recruest for a work session on the Sonnenalp redevelooment and
broposed Special Development District at 20 Vail road. Part of Lot L, Block 5-E. Vail Villaqe 1st Filind.Applicant: Sonnenalo Progarties, Inc.
Kristan Ptit-z explained that the request was for the
redeveloprnent of the Sonnenalp property and a proposed Special
Development District. Sbe gave a brlef suumary of the request
and reviewed the zoning analysls, She reviewed those Ltens related to the project found witbin the Vail ViIIage ltlaster PIan
including Sub-Area *L-3, enphasizing coals & Policies, and Illustrative Plans. She also provided corresponding preliminary staff conments. Kristan then relayed conments nade by the Fire
Department and Public Works. This was a work session, sio no
recornmendation was made.
Jay Peterson, representing the applicant, explained that they
were before the board on a prelirninary basis and sinply wanted
comnents and suggestions so they could move ahead with the design
process.
Irene Westby, nanager of the Talisnan, explained that the owners
had discussed the proposal , though not in depth, regarding
coordination with the Sonnenalp on landscape and parking. As tbe
manalJer, she would encourage the board to move faster. They do
have concerns with parking, landscape and fire access.
Jay explained that he had rnet with the president of the
association and the Sonnenalp trad offered access through the
Sonnenalp structure.
Marilyn Fletcher, a Talisrnan condoninium ownet, feLt the proposal
was very nice looking. She nas concerned about the setbacks and
ingress/egress.
Kent Rose, speaking for himself as a councll llenber' felt that
tn! zonini airafysit found within the meno was well prelared.- In
the futur6, he iould like to see a comparison of.the sDD with the
Viffate Uaiter Plan as well. He suggested-to-Kristan to add tttis
.orpiii""n to the present chart. He etated that the additional
;;F;i;"n eoutd frltp frin lean nore favorable toward the project.
es it was qurrently depicted, the project looked too large'
Larrv Estcsith explaLned that he would prefer that the Council
r"rlir= not participate in the PEC neeting. - The Council is a
quasi-judicilf board and he felt thelr participation could cause
legal problems.
Diana asked if they could speak in a general sense or at a
uinimun ask questions, and larry said tryes.r
Uerv Lapin felt that page 2 of the memo ttas the key. lqtt an- SDD
it prop-osed, there stroufa be trade-offs. t{e wanted to knon what
the-se trade-offs were. He felt that staff presented the trade-
"iii in respect to the Marriott project w911. Regarding the
uiiii"Ct-prbject, he felt that too much tine was spent comparing
itre origf-naf-appiication to the current proposal .- Merv agreed
ri[n-r,"iry esr;itb, that the councilts comments should be linited
ii tf,i, p-oint. The Council was in a quasi-judicial role.
Kristan explained that the Planning Cornmissiol ginply_wanted_
len"raf coirnents and issues that tbe Councll felt needed to be
addressed.
I4mn Frltzlen asked if staff could restate the PurPose -of iipfyi"g underlying zoning and Kristan explained that there were
Ui-si.lafiy two rlas6ns. The first was to identify the uses
possible-on the site and the second qras used to cornpare the
ii"p"=if sith the underlying, zoning requirernents which PEC and
bouncil always request staff to do.
Jav peterson addressed the trade-off issue. He stated that the
iJ'nnenafp building could rneet the PA criteria, however, the. __iliidifi-aesign w5ura become a terrible bulky nass in the niddle
of the lot. He also felt that the proposed use of 99* hotel
ioo." 1yas a trade-off. AIso, the pioposal was not far over GRpA.
Ehe current proposal was at 32 units per acre cornpared to the 25
units per acie ialled for under PA zoning'
Peggyosterfossstatedthatitwouldbehelpfulifallparties
coi6-ernea had a copy of the Vail Village Master Plan'
Jin Shearer felt it was extrernely inportant for the sonnenalp to
work nith the Talisman regarding-parking,and landscaping. He was
concerned about the Ludwii aecX-and its impact on the creek area.
He also wanted to see the enployee housing issue addressed. He
was very cor,""rrr"d about the-height creating a crowded feeling on
Dleadow Drive. He underEtood Jayrs connents regarding the bulk in
the niddle of the lot, but felt that tlre nass could be pulled off of Meados Drive and a nore attractive walk created. He felt the
approach sould create nore interest for the retail area. Jin
also felt a phasing plan was needed. iIfut liked the increase Ln
Iodging units, underground parking, and felt that the Faesslers
were good managers. lle had Bone concern about the anount of retail space and density. lle prefered the tower as an
architectural feature as opposed to a ibuilding'r provLding livinE
area in the toser.
Kathy warren asked if the etaff could total all the sq. footage
calculatlons (GRFA, Accessorlf etc..) on the charts in the future.
From what she could qulckly calculate, the proposal was over PA
zoning by 25t. Kathy felt ehe could not support setback
variances for Vail Road, Meadow Drive or the stream and she felt that the heights called for by the uaster PIan should be adhered to. Though slightly under on site coverage and over on
landscaping, the landscaped area is private and should be opened
up and rnore invLting to the public. creek access ls lmportant.
Kathy felt enployee housing was necessary and would like to see it on site. The Talisuan parking should also be addressed. No
variances on parking should be given. Lodge use is very good.
She is tooking for the public aood in respect to the project.
Kathy felt that, because it was a hotel , she was not as concerned
with units per acre as she was with GRFA. She did not see nuch in the way of benefits for the Town.
Jay, in response to the employee housing issue, stated that the
Faesslers oin za units in solar Vail as well as sone units in
Bighorn.
Chuck Crist stated that he had always santed to see the slte
developed. lle had concerns about the toner. He stated that he
was not as soncerned nith setbacks trith the exception of lleadolr
drive. The rnass on Meadow Drive needs to be broken up. The loss
of Landscaping is a problem. He also would like to see employee
housing incorporated into the project on site. He felt that the
Town vould be losing green space and the strean would be blocked
from the public and he liked the amount of retail space proposed.
He liked the underground parking.
Dalton was very concerned with the setbacks as they related to
the transfer of open space from public areas to private areas.
The 2O foot setback nust be rnaintaLned. The berm, per the Vail
Village llaster Plan, should be kept. He felt that the building,
along Meadow Drive, should be stepped back in order to avoid a ilcanyonil affect. He did not feel he could approve the reguested
setblck variances. The parking for the entire project including
Talisman and Swiss House must be addressed.
Dalton continued by quoting the Vall Village uaster PIan sub-Area
f1-5 Willow Bridge Road l{alknay as stating:
nA decorative paver pedestrian wallaray, separated from the street and acsented by a strong landscaped area to
encourage pedestrian cLrculation along Headow Drive.
Loss of parking wiII need to be relocated on site.rl
Dalton felt that the ingress/egress should be on the east side of the Sonnenalp by ViIIage Center (Swiss House) and the planter
along Meadow Drive nust stay. Dalton also felt that the building
should be pulled back to buffer noise frorl bus traffic. He felt that the gate should be noved east and felt that the mass and bulk was not compatible with East Meadow Drive. Dalton felt that the 48 foot height requirernent should be strictly adhered to, a
lOt r tower was out of the question and the King Ludwig deck
should be stepped down towards the creek. The deck creates too
much of a wall. Dalton felt that the employee housinq should be on-site and that the proposal was taking open space and
landscaping away fron the public. The applicant should put in public spaces, Iike a stream walk. He conrnended the Faesslers for being exceflent hoteliers.
Ludwig complimented the Faesslers for runnLng a rclass
operation.rr Ludwig Kurz felt the proposal needed a comprehensive parking plan as well as an access study. He felt he could give
some leeway with the heigtrt and mass, however, the building still
needed work. Ludwig felt that the nalkway and loading area were in conflict and need a better interface. Jay stated that the
loading area atas located by default. Ludwig also felt that the j-nternal open space was naxinized at the sacrifice of areas along
Meadow Dr. and VaiI Road.
Diana stated that the proposal disregarded the Vail Village
I{aster Plan. She questioned whether parking for cornmercial would
be accessible and reserved for commercial . Jay said space uould
be made available to customers. She felt that the building was beautiful but would be more appropriate on large acreage. Diana felt that a streamwalk should be proposed and the parking
situation concerned her.
Jay explained that he felt the parking regulations pertained to
snaller hotel rooms. The proposed parking would work similar to
Crossroads and the gate would be relocated. Diana felt that the
loading needed to be either noved away fron the creek or
inproved. Parking for Swiss House and Talisrnan needs to be
figured out. The role of the Talisnan also needs to be defined.
frnployee housing must be addressed - perhaps Permanently restrict
what Sonnenalp already has for ernployee units. She felt it was
Lmportant to know what the Talisrnanrs Lntentlons were soon and
what would be done. Diana also had concerns regarding the
setbacks along lleadow Drive and Vail Road. She didnrt have a
problem with a variance for an architestural statenent, however,
the height in general must be reduced. Diana was concerned
whether an SDD was realy necessary. She guestioned the benefit of the proJect to the publlc and stated nore general public
inprovements were needed.
Kathy Warren felt that the trash situation needed to be addressed
and that the appllcant needed to soften the approach at the
pedestrlan level. She also feLt that new enployee housing units
needed to be addressed ln addition to those already owned. she felt the comercial sguare footage also contributed to enployee
housing demand.
Jay fett that an additional ernployee unit requirement nould be penalizing the applicant for having the foresight to purchase the units. The appllcant purchased the Solar Crest units vith the
intention of completing the redevelopment currently proposed.
Ton Steinberg conmented that he felt the proposal was going in
the correct direction. He also agreed with Diana that he sas not
sure an SDD sould be needed.
A recruest for a work session for an exterior alteration' a site
coveraqe variance. a heiqht variance. a landscape variance and a
floodplain modification for the Covered Bridoe Buildincr, locate9
on Lot C and Lot D, and the southwesterlv 4 feet of Lot B' all in
Block 5-8, Vail Villaqe lst Filing. 227 Bridqe Street.Applicant: Hillis of Snowrnass, Inc. and Bruce Anm & Associates.
Mike l.lollica explained that the applicants ltere proposing a rnajor
redevelopment of the covered Bridge Building. The proposal
catled for major modifications to the front entrance of the
existing commercial spaces, the creation of loner level
cornmercial spaces, infill on the north and northwest sections of
the existing structure, the addition of an elevator, and the
addition of two upper floors. The request involved 5 separate
applications, an exterior alteration reguest, a site coverage vlriance request, a height variance request, a landscape variance
reguest, and a floodptain nodification request. Mike reviewed
the applicable zoning considerations and gave prelininary staff
comments. Since this was a work session, no staff
reconmendations were made
Kathy warren asked what the allowed GRFA was and Mike e:<plained that the sunrey was not finished and therefore calculations were
not made with regard to GRFA. Ned Gwathney, project architect,felt that they would be within what was allowed.
Ned explained the changes that ltere made since the staff memo was
written. The only issue he felt that the PEC night be concerned
about was the height of the new roof line. The new proposal did,
however, elininate the flat roof design. He explained that the
adJacent properties vere built prior to the enactment of the
height restrictions and most were above the height of the present
covered Bridge Building. Ned stated that the proposal would be in tine with the surrounding properties, and that the design did not negatively affect adjacent properties. In fact the proposal
could enhance the adjacent properties, for example, the new roof
would screen rrPeplrs gall.tr
Ton Steinberg, sitting in the audience, sal.d he felt he rould
have no objections to the height variance due to the fact that the roof would screen Pepirs wall.
Dalton WilLians encouraged working with the pocket park and
extending the strearn walk down to the end of the property line,if at all possible, so that it could be contlnued in the future.
Chuck Crist asked if they would be increasing common space and
Ned answered rrno.r! However, there would be no decrease in connon
space either. Chuck asked how the height related to the grade
found on Bridge Street and Ned answered that Bridge Street is 6l
higher than the grade used to calculate height. Ned also wanted
Chuck to bear in nind that the building was stepped back, hence
the highest point would be 50r off of the street.
Chuck explained that he liked the proposal . He would like to see
more flower boxes and perhaps a more Tyrolean look.
Ludwig Kurz felt the project looked good. He questioned whether
there was any opposition to the project and Mike explained that
the proposal had not formalty been published since ttris was sinply a work session. !,!ike explained that he did have one letter at that time from Rod Slifer in favor of the proposal .
Kathy warren asked, if they removed the building area by the park, highlighted in yellow on the plans, including the rear stair, if the project would be in courpliance with site coverage.
She also stated that she was not comfortable with the height
variance but if the Town could end up with a nore usable public
park she could consider the height variance. She was not
comfortable with the site coverage variance. Kathy felt she
could not object to the exterior alteration, it rras a much needed
improvement.
Kathy questioned whether the pocket park was identified in the
vail village ltaster PIan and Mike explained that it was not
addressed. Kathy was eoncerned about the Bridge Street access to
the park and wanted to see more detail.
Jin Shearer felt the project was good looking. He liked the roof
Iines and would like to see nore planter boxes. He stated that
the reason behind a variance is to inprove the property. He
would like to see irnprovenents to the streamwalk and to see all
evergrreens saved or 4 put in for the 2 taken out. He felt there
rnight be a problen with the floodplain nodification. He sas
concerned with the elevator shaft and water 6eepage. He had no problen vlth the height. lte woul.d rather have an attractive roof lLne. He was satisfied vith the looks of the proposal . He felt the staff and board needed to look at the view corridor. IIe liked the way the proposal tiered back from the street with the
height.
Diana Donovan felt it would be wonderful to get a wallnray to Gore
Creek Plaza. She felt it would be nlce to have jogs, and bay
windows on the north side of the building. she felt the access to the park needed to be more enticing. she rtas not sure about
the height. Trade-offs and other considerations such as
screening Pepi's building wouJ-d be a help. She would have a hard tine supporting the proposal if the evergreen trees were renoved.
Mike explained that the Town Iandscape Architect felt the trees
rrere very healthy and would last many years.
Diana suggested the use of pavers rather than asphalt in front of the building.
Chuck Crist asked about the aluminun siding that was originally
proposed and Ned explained that the siding had been changed to
wood.
The Putrlic Hearing was called to order at 3:10 p.m. by Diana
Donovan, Chairperson. Connie Kniqht was absent. In the interest of time, the board skipped to Iten No. 4. The applicants for
Items No. 2 & 3 were not present.
rtem No. 4: A request for a conditional use oermit for a
construction staqincr area, located iust uphill of the colden Peak snoldmaking pumphouse' Tract B'
VaiI Village 7th Filinq.Applicant: VaiI Associates, Inc.
Shelly Mello exptained that VaiI Associates rtas requesting a
conditional- use per:nit for a sunmer seasonal staging area at the
Go1den Peak base area for the constructlon of the Far East
Restaurant. The area was located in the Ski Base Recreation zone district. In this zone district, rrsunmer outdoor Storage for
lllountal,n Equipnentrr is an allowed conditional use. llhe proposed
use would be for an office trailer, 12 employee parking sPaces for the surnmer of 1990 and 25 parking spaces for 1991. A lLnited
amount of construction materials would also be located at the
staging area. The construction trailer and the building
naterials would be removed by Novenber 15th of each year. Shelly
explained that staff was concerned about parking being located on the site and suggested the possibility of located the parking uphill on county land or an alternate area such as the West Day Lot. The staff recommendation was for approval with conditlons as found within the memo.
Joe Macy explained that the request was nade in order to construct a 5OO seat restaurant at the Far East. He stated that Vail Associates had received at least 2 other conditional use permits and had no complaints. They dld not want to take parking
away from the public by parklng their employees in public parking areas. The new Vlllage Parking Structure had created a parking
shortage.
Jack Hunn e:rplained that part of the goal was to have visibility for delivery trucks. The other reason waE to have a collecting place for enployees in order to llnit the nunber of vehicles on
the nountain. The applicant had originally looked at using the
west Day Lot. However, when the Town of Vail decided to go forth with the parking structure expansion, it was felt that this lot
would be needed for public parking.
Joe l{acy ctarified that the staging area was actually downhill of
the prrrnphouse. Kristan Pritz noted that the proposal had stated specifically that the staging would be uphi11.
Ludwig Kurz asked if any of the area would be fenced or screened
and Jack Hunn explained that the storage area would not be
screened.
Ludwig saw no problems with having both the storage area and parking on the site. He understood the hardship of staging frorn
trro areas.
Diana Donovan asked why Vail Associates did not wish to use the
Eagle County area uphill since it was already graveled and
graded.
Dalton Williarns had no problen vittr delivery and staging but
wanted the parking hidden. He also wanted to know vhy the staff
conditions of approval included revegetating after the first year. He felt it would be a waste of tine and money, for the
area would be used for skiing in the winter and reused for
staging the next year. He felt it would be sufficient to
revegetate in the fall of 1991.
Jl-rn Shearer asked why the request was for 12 cars in 1990 and 25 in 1991 and Joe uacy explained that the finish construction whlch
would be done in the second year required nore employees. Jim
connented that the biggest problem would be how the site rrould
look from I-7o.
Diana Donovan felt that if the area was screened she could
support the parking of 12 vehicles. She was EtlII unsure about
25 vehicles. Diana also felt that the ndust preventLonn
statenent should state from the iVlsta-Bahnr. She connented that
she would rather aee approval for the etaging sJ.te corne through
the VaiL board than to deny the reguest and be proposed to Eagle
county and have no control .
A rnotion to allproval the re<ruested conditLonal use pemit
with the followinq conditions vas made bv Kathv Warren and
seconded bv Chuck Crist.
Conditions:
1. That the stacrincr site be used for constructLon fron
June 1, 199o-Novenber 15, 199o and the end of the ski
season to November 15. 1991; and
2. A11 areas inpacted bv the construction staginq have
straw laid at the bv Novernber 3o, 1990 and be
conpletelv revegetated by Novernber 30. 1991; and
3. No nrore than 12 vehicles at any one tine. screened in a
manner apnroved bv staff in 1990 and no more than 5
vehicles at anv 1 tine be parked on site in 1991r and
A 3Or setback be nal-ntained from ltill Creek; and
road.
VOTE: 6-0 IN FAVOR
Item No. 5: A reauest for a side and front setback variance in
order to construct a garade on Lot 7, Block 3,Vail Village 9th Filino' 898 Red Sandstone Circle.Apolicant: Paul Testwuide
Shelly l,lello explained that the request was for a garage and
entry addltion to the north and west sides of the existing
resl-dence. The proposed garage had a total area of 526 sq. ft.
and would encroach a maximun of 3 ft. into the 15 foot side
setback reguirenent and 2 ft. into the 20 foot front setback
requirement. with the exception of the reguested varlance, all
other developnent standards would be met. The staff
recommendation was for approval of the reguest wlth the condition that the easternmost lor of the existing paved parklng area be
removed and landscaped. The variance would not be a grant of
special privilege and did not J.npact adJacent properties l-n a
4.
5.That the applicant treat the road fron the Vista Bahn to the stacrinq area to limlt the amount of road dust that would result fron thq increased use of the access
negative manner. The staff felt that the addition of enclosed parking would iloprove the general appearance of the neighborhood.
Galen stated that he had signlflcantly reduced the garage per the board's request at the last neeting. Ttrey were sinply asking to keep the asphalt. The proposal did add a significant anount of landscapl.ng. They wistred to leave the asphalt as a place for the kids to play. Galen also asked to have a little leeway sith the setback (inches) Ln order to avoid having extensive survey rrork.
Kathy lfarren asked nhy the additional 10r of asphalt was needed
and Mrs. Testwuide explained that without the additional asphalt they would have no guest parking. cuests sould not want to parlr in front of the garage, therefore blocking the garage.
Jirn Shearer questioned the landscapl-ng as lt rras portrayed on the p1an. He felt if the 10r area was left, it sould look strange.Mrs. Testwuide er<plained the existing rock rnll which franed the portion being spoken of and how the landscape features were planned around the asphalt.
Kathy Warren stated that she understood the staffrs concerns.
Holtever, she could also slmpathize with llrs. Testwuiders
concerns.
Chuck Crist, Dalton Williams, and Ludwig Kurz
Diana Donovan suggested the applicant reduce
west side of the driveway.
had no soncerns.
the asphalt on the
A notion to approve the requested 3 t side setback and 2 |
front setback variances with condition as follows rras made
bv Kathy Warren and Seconded by Jim Shearer per findinos C-
1--topographv. C-2 and C-3.
Conditions:
1. The Desiqn Review Board be asked to look at elininatincr asphalt otr the West side of the drivewall and
landscaping.
VOTE: 6-0 IN FAVOR
Item No. 6: A recruest for a front setback variance and a creek
setback variance for Lot 6, Vail Village West,
Filincr No. 2. 1755 tfest Gore Creek Drive.Applicants Dan and Karen Forev
Mike uollica explained that the applicants lrere requesting
variances frorn the front setback and the streanr setback. They
sere proposing a major remodel of the existing tso-fanily hone
10
which included an attached two-car garage with a secondary,rental unit located above the garage vhich ls reguired to be restricted per the Townrs zoning code. Mike also explalned that the lot was severely constrained by the lluitatlons of the
setbacks and the remalnlng buildable area was llnited. The lot
was also constrained by the existing topography; the average
slope beneath the parking area and the proposed garage site was
approximately 31*. The elope dld allow the owners to construct a garage in the front setback without a variance. The variance was
required due to the proposed secondary unit located above the garage. The staff recornmendation was for approval . Staff believed the lot to be encunbered slth a phyelcal hardship and
believed the slting of the garage had been designed ln the most sensitive manner posslble.
John PerkJ.ns, representing the applicant, e:<plained that the hone
was purchased rrith the Lntent of renodellng. The plan nas to
convert the duplex into one unl.t and add the garage and caretaker unit. He felt the key points were that the appllcant was
proposing to upgrade a property and add a rnuch needed enployee unit.
Kathy Rlarren felt that the parking asphalt should be decreased to 4o' compared to the proposed 50r width.
Chuck Crist coronented that he liked the plan as presented.
Ludwig Kurz also liked the proposal .
Jin Shearer agreed with Kathy that the drl.veway could be
decreased in width and John Perkins felt he could adJust the
width but felt 4or may be too snall.
Jim con'nented that it nas part of the job as a Planning
Conmissioner to encourage upgrading, enployee housing and covered parking. He could not see any negative inpacts and therefore
could support the proposal .
Diana Donovan concurred with the board. In general , she felt that the PEc was beginning to be too easy with lots that had physical constraints. The zoning regulations were written to
address the matters and should be adlrered to.
A notion to aporove the reguests per the staff roemo, with
the condition that the DRB review the width of the drivewarr to maintain as close to a 4or as possi.ble, was nade bv Jin
shearer and seconded bv Kathy warren.
VOTE: 6-0 IN FAVOR
11
Item No. 7:A reouest for a conditional use permit and a heiqht variance in order to construct an antenna at the Vail ti[unlclpal Bui.ldino. 75 South Frontacre
Road.Applicant: town of Vail Police Department
Andy Knudtsen explained that the Police Department proposed to build a tower for a new antenna and nicrowave dish as part of an
inprovement to the Energency Senrices Conrnunication System. The tower would be 40 feet tall with a 10 foot antenna on top for a total of 5O feet in height. The staff felt that the proposal
would have nininal negative inpacts and that the overall project
would improve the character of the area. The rtaff
recoromendation was for approval with eonditions as Etated in the
memo.
Kathy Warren felt that the uechanical eguipnent referred to in the recommended conditions of approval was already supposed to
have been rernoved. Ken Hughy agreed and apologized that it had not already been done. He assured Kathy that it would be done.
Dalton Willians was concerned about the proposed height of the toser and Ken exlrlained that he had looked into alternatives;
however, cost and the lack of cooperation from the U.s. West building attributed to the proposed location.
Ken conmented that the long range plans were to relocate the police station and hopefully the move would include moving all the equipment.
Kristan wanted the board to understand that the
reconmending approval of the reguest was because
located in the Pub1ic Use dlstrict, not because the Town of Vail .
reason staff rras
the building was
the applicant was
Ludwig stated that he had concerns, however, in fight of the safety issues he felt he could support the project.
Jim Shearer asked if there rrould be any guide wires and Ken
responded rrn6. rr Jim then asked what the chances were of the
Police Departnent adding other dishes in the future and Xen
explained that there were no plans for additions in the near future. Jin pointed out that the paint color rtas an inportant
issue for the Design Review Board to consider.
Kathy warren had no cornments.
Diana felt that the big trees salvaged fron the parking structure
renovation rrouLd be too big and would attract attention rather
than divert attention to the tower. She would prefer to see
aspens but felt it vas a matter better left for tbe Design Review
Board to review.
L2
A notion to approve the conditional use oennit oer the staff
memo and staff conditions as follows rtas made bv Ludltiq Kurz
and seconded by Jin Shearer.
ConditLons:
1. Remove unnecessarv mectranical eouipment on the roof;
and
2.
3.
and
Buffer the tower bv plantinq 3-5 trees; and
4. Paint the tower, dish, and antenna with a non-
reflective. environnentallv sensitive paint color per
the Desiqn Review Board aPProval.
VOTE: 6-0 IN FAVOR
Iten No. 8:
shelly t{elIo explained that the applicant was requesting a
variance from the 20 f|u. side and rear setback requirement to
allow for the construction of a 101.25 sq. ft. addition on the
north side of the building. The variance request was for an 11
ft. encroachment into the 20 ft. rear setback and a 15 ft.
encroachment into the 20 ft. side yard setback. Bighorn Terrace
is a nonconforning subdivision because it was annexed into the
ToIf,n and zoned MDMF after it was established- The imposed
setbacks greatly linit the locations of possible additions which
would not-requiie setback variances. The staff recomrnendation
was for denial of the request. Staff acknowledged that other
properties in the Bighorn Terrace subdivision had received
setback variances and therefore the variance request rtas not a
grant of special privilege and that although there uere
exceptions or extraordinary conditions applicable to the lot
which did not generally apply to their properties in the same
zone district, a uinimum setback should be maintained in order
to gTuarantee a minimum distance between buildings to insure puffic health , safety, and welfare as well as the fair treatnent
of aff property owners within Bighorn Terrace. If the PEc rtere
to appr-ove the variance request, staff recornmended the applicant
le rLquired to underground the electrical service frorn the
service pole.
Colunbine Drive. Unit #20. Blqhorn Terrace.
13
John Nilsson explained that he needed the space to nake the hone
nore habitable. He felt the rrdistance between bulldingsrr rule
was unfair since there were nany homes much closer together. He felt the addition vould J.mprove the area by ridding the junk on his porch.
Ludwig Kurz didnft feel the addition inpacted neighboring properties in a negative way. He could not see denying the
request with the amendment of the code still outstanding.
Dalton Williarns was also concerned about denying the request without formal policies being Ln force. He asked where the pole
and lines yere. He felt it was unreasonable to ask the applicant to underground the wires when it had not been asked in the past.
Kristan and Shelly enphasized that when a variance is granted,
many tines there Ls a trade-off. In this case, the
undergrounding of wires nust begin somewhere.
Dalton nas not in favor of requiring the applicant to underground the wires. He felt he could support a condition that reguired the applicant to underground the wires at the tine that 50* of the residents whose lines were located on the same pole
undergrounded their wires.
Chuck Crist had no problen supporting the variance requests. He
was not in favor of requiring the applicant to underground the uires. He would rather see increased landscapi.ng.
Kathy warren clarified that the addition would be where the existing deck was located. Because the deck was already there,
she would be comfortable with the addition. She would also like to see the undergrounding of utilities.
Jin Shearer asked how close the house was to the west and Shelly
explained that the distance was 17r staggered but the deck
encLosure would not increase the distance. Jim shared Daltonrs feeling regarding the undergrounding of utilities though he did
agree that the Town should get some type of trade-off in return for a variance.
Diana agreed wlth Kathy warren in that the utilities needed to be
undergrounded.
John Nilsson felt it uas unfair to reguire hin to underground the utilities until done by all. He explained that, within the last
6 nonths, there was a couunittee forrred to try and have the lines
undergrounded. The cornrnittee was unsuccessful . During his activity on the coromittee, the infomation he received was contrary. He understood one line at a time could not be
L4
undergrounded. It sould have to be a nass proJect. ne stated he
would be happy to get bids on the cost' reopen conversatlon with
the association regarding ttre undergrounding of the utilities,
and be willing to spend up to $400.00 to underground the lndividual utility Iines to hls unit.
Conditions:
1. The appll.cant obtaLn 3 bids and agrees to underground utilities if the cost of undergroundinq was S4o0.oo or
less.
association does.
The applicant agrees to head a conmittee for Buildinqs A. B. and C in order to approach HoIv Cross Electric
and the Town to address the underqrounding of the utitities for the nroiect as a who-Ie.
VOTE: 6-0 IN FAVOR
Iten No. 9:A recruest for an amendnent to SDD No. 23. ViaI
National Bank. Part of Lot D, Block 2, Vail
l{ike }tollica explained that the application involved two
elements, an amendment to the approved development plan to allow for the enclosure of two decks on the third floor of ttre
structure and an anendment to the parking standards of SDD No. 23 in order to provide parking for this proposed addition withln the
parking structure at the vail Valley l,ledical Center. lhe
proposal constitutes a najor amendnent to an exlsting sDD. The
Planning Conmissions action is advisory, and final decisions are
nade by the Town Council. The Etaff was supportive of the Vail
National Bankrs request. Staff was comfortable with the tirning of the request and the Modification Agreement and frrevocable r.etter of credit. staff felt that the joint-use parking
arrangement nas very reasonable. The staff reconmendation carried conditions as found within the memo.
Jay Peterson, representing the applicant, explained that the
applicant had waited for the Medical Center to get approval for
the additional spaces and begin construction before they returned to the PEC. He fel-t the tining tras now right.
2.
3.
15
Kathy tfarren agreed the tining was rlght and Jin Shearer agreed.
Dalton Willians questioned, since the applicant was purchasing
extra spaces, if the board could require then to delete a space that he felt was unsafe located on the front lot. Discussion
centered around the issue and it was decided that the board did
not have the authority to requlre the renoval of the space.
A motion to approve the recruests per staff nemo and
conditions as follows was made by Ludwicr Kurz and seconded bv Dalton l{illians.
Conditions:
the Medical Center receives a TemPorary Certificate of
occupancy for the parkinq structure.
If for some unforeseen reason the Medical Centerrs parkina structure is not conpleted. the newlv
constructed deck enclosure shall only be allowed to be
used for comuron storage. The owner shall be recruired to subrnit a written agreenent addressingr this condition
on the use of the space for the Town Attornevre review
and this shall be recorded. on the land records, at the
Eaqle Countv Clerk and Recorder's Office.
VOTE: 6-0 IN FAVOR
Iten No. 10: A recruest for an amendnent to the Townrs zonino
code to add fiTelevision Stationsrr as a first floor. or street level , conditional use in the
CommerciaL Core II zone district' Section
18.26.040.Applicant: Vail./Beaver Creek Television Network.
Mike l.tollica explained that the applicant ttas requesting to amend
section 18.26.040 of the Town of vail zoning code in order to add rrTelevision Stationsrr as a first floor level , conditional use in
the Conmercial core II zone district. The current zoning code
did not specifically address tel.evision stations, however the
position of ttre planning staff had been that television stations iall under the category of professional offices. Professional offices are currently not allowed as pernitted or conditional
uses on firEt floor or street level . The staff reconmended
denlal of the applicantrs reguest to nodify the Townrs Zoning
Code. Staff did not support the proposed change in the zoning
The Town of Vail will not issue a Tenporarv Certificate of Occupancy to the Vail National Bank (for the
enclosure of the two balconLes), until sueb Eilne as
1.
2.
16
code as they felt that the applicantrs request was not conEistent with the purpose section of the Conmercial Core II zone district.
Although staff bell.eved that television etatlons should be
allowable uses in Connercial Core II at basement or second floor levels, staff strongly felt that the proposed use on the first floor was inappropriate.
Bll.l Perkins, President of VaLl/Beaver Creek T.V., disagreed with
the staffrs assu:nptlon that a Televislon Statlon should fall l-nto
the same category as a professl-onal office. First, a television station needed high ceilings. The nature of the business was to
cater to and attract the gruestE of the valley. An open frontage is also very Lnportant. He stated that the merchants in the area
nere very supportive. Bill elaborated that the area they were
considering was an area that had been unsuccessful for retail use in the past.
Chuck stated that due to the nature of Vail and this proposed
T.V. Station, he would tend to support the proposal . However, he
was afraid of creating a precedent for other professional
offices.
Kathy Warren asked staff hort the proposal would be handled since T.v. Stations were not directly dealt with in the code and
Kristan explained that the staff made the assumption T.v.
Stations would fall into the sane category as professional
offices due to sirnilar uses and inpacts. Kathy felt she could
not support the proposal.
Jim Shearer felt he could be supportive of anything that would build cl-ientele ln the area but didnrt feel a T.V. Station would bring sales tax revenue to the Town.
BiII Perkins stated that he understood the boardts soncerts.
However, he needed a tenporary solution until the Sunbird was rebuilt. He asked if the board would be supportive if he could
nake the station first floor without frontage on the nall. It
would be difficutt for hin to operate but felt i.t could be
nanaged.
Kristan felt that it would still be considered first floor level
even vithout the frontage on the nall.
Dl-ana cornrnented that it was not appropriate to change zoning for
a single applicant.
Ludrrig Kurz felt that the board was lrung up on the definition of
street level and stated that the proposed eite was, nithout a
doubt, first floor and a T.v. station should be considered a
professional office. He fett the board could not afford to set a
precedent.
L7
Dalton Willians sonrnented that he had the chance in the past to operate a T.V. Station. He felt the board was nissing the point of traffic. If done correctly, a T.V. Station could increase sales tax in excess of what could be generated by a retail store located in ttre same space. He felt this vas the exact klnd of conditional use that should be permitted
Chuck Crist asked staff if a permanent condition could be put on a conditional use and Diana stated an exanple from pg 346 of the
code, Barber and Beauty Shops, which stated the use would be
allowed as long as there was no exterior frontage.
Discussion then centered around the possibility of adding T.V.Stations under the same conditions as the Beauty shops and
whether it would be feasible for the applicant.
Kristan comnented that if the use was allowed under the Beauty
Shop conditions, the space would be taken away from other viable retail shops.
A rnotion to denv the request to amend the zonino code per
the staff meno was made bv Kathy Warren and seconded by
Ludwj.g Kurz.
It was reguested by the board that the vote be passed on to the
Town Council with conments fron the board as follows:
chuck Crist - guestions whether the proposed use will really
draw pedestrians to the area. Holdever, he feels that due to the generaL resort nature of the Town of VaiI and the proposed T.V. station he tends to
support the reguest.
Kathy l{arren
- questions whether a conditional use permit
process would be nore appropriate if the proposal
had absolutely no frontage on a pedestrian mall or
street.
- generally felt that the proposed use Itas a viable use on first floor in CCII.
- generally not comfortable with the reguest.
- she believes that the requested use would be better suited to a basement or second floor level
and suggested that the applicant pursue an
amendment to the zoning code regarding Section
L8.24.030(C-6) regarding perrnitted uses on first floor or street level sithin a structure, subject to the issuance of a conditional use perait, g@
the use does not have any exterior frontaqe on a public wav, street. walkwav or mall area.
18
Jin Shearer - fe ln favor of buitdlng up the coumercial areaa in LionEhead, but believes tbat lfunlted eales tax
would be generated by this proposal .
- belLeves that an upper fLoor location would be
more approprLate and feels that an upper floor
would provide a better backdrop of the ekl area for the T.V. studio.
- belleves that the proposed use does have
marketable value for the Town of VaiI but feels that we nust guard against setting a precedent with thls proposed use.
- agrees with Kathy Warren regarding Section
La.24.o30(C-6) and stressed the need to protect
against setting a precedent and feels that tre was voting strictly as a Planning Conmission rnenber
and not with his enotLons.
Diana Donovan -believes that once this use is listed as a
condLtional use it would be very difficult to deny
a request for such a conditional use.
- agrees with Kathy l{arren and Chuck Crist
regarding Section La.24.030 (C-6).
Ludwig Kurz - agrees with tbe staff that we cannot afford to set a precedent with the proposed change and is not in favor of the request.
Dalton Williams- believes that this proposed use would produce
very heavy pedestrl.an traffic in Lionshead, which
would generate sales and sales tax.
- believes that this is exactly what the Town of VaiI wants.
-believes that people wiII show up for this
proposed use. Feels that this is a ildynaniterl
idea.
-believes that this is a proper conditional use.
VOTE: 4-2 WITE DALTON WTLLIA}TS A}{D CHUCK CRTST OPPOSED TO
THE DENIAL
19
Iten No. 11:
East Gore Creek DrLve.Applicant: Kevin Clair^/Chuck Rosencrui-st
This iten was Item No. 12:
Bridoe Street.Applicant: HillLs of Snownass, Inc. and
Bruce Amm & Associates.
Mike Mollica explained that the reguest was to schedule a review perLod. Staff recommended a 9O day review period for the covered
Bridge Building and a 50 day review period for the Montaneros.
A.motion to set the review periods as recommended bv staff
was made bv Kathv Warren and seconded by Jim Shearer.
VOTE: 6-0 IN FAVOR
ftem No. 13:
Itern No. 14:
805,Potato Patch Drive.Applicant: Patsv and Pedro Cerisola
A recruest for an exterior alteration and a
landscape variance in order to construct an addition to the Bell Tower Buildinq at 201 Gore
Creek Drive, Part of Tract A. Block 58, Vail
VilLaoe lst Filing.
Applicant: Her:nann Staufer - Lancelot Restaurant
A motion to table Itenr No.s 13 and 14 to JuIy 9, 1990 was
nade by Kathy Warren and seconded by Dalton Willians.
VOTE: 6-0 fN FAVOR
A reEuest for a conditional use nerait for a deck
exoansion at the Sweet Basil restaurant, located
on Tract A. Block 58, Vail Village lst Filinq, 193
A.
B.
withdrawn, no action was taken.
and a floodnlain modification on Lot C and
Aoolicant: Montaneros Condo. Assoc.
20
Iten No. 1: Aoproval of minutes from June 4, 1990 and June 11.
1990 neetinqs.
A motlon to approve the ninutes fron the June 4. 1990
minutes as wrLtten was nade bv Jim Shearer and seconded bv
Ludwia Kurz.
VOTE: 6-0 fN FAVOR
Chuck CriEt stated that on page 13 of the 6/LL/9O minutes the
vote should be adJusted to ehow that he had abstained.
Kathy Warren also had changes to be made on the 6/LL/90 ninutes
and asked if she could nake them later and have the mlnutes
resubnitted for approval at the next meetJ-ng.
Item No. 2: A recruest for a conditional use perrnit to allow for a Bed and Breakfast at Lots 6 and 1/2 of 5,
Block 5. Vail Villaqe Seventh Filino' 1119 E.
Ptarmiqan Road.Aorclicant: Monie S. Beal .
There irere no public conments and the applJ-cant ttas not present
A motion to approve the reouest per the staff memo was made
bw Dalton Wiltiams and seconded bv Chuck Crist.
VOBE: 6-0 IN FAVOR
Item No. 3: A recruest for a conditional use oermit to allow
There
bv Chuck Crist and seconded bv Ludwicl Kurz.
VOTE: 6.0 IN FAVOR
The neeting r'ras adjourned at approxirnately 7:oo P.m.
for a Bed and Breakfast at Lot 8, Elock 3. Biahorn
Subdlvision, 5th Addition. 5198 Gore Circle.Applicant: John and Paula Canninq
nere no public comments and the applicant was not present
A notion to anprove the recruest per the staff meno was made
2L
{.I
TO:
FROM:
DATE3
SU&TECI:
Planning and Environmental Coronission
Connunity Development Department
June 25, 1990
A reguest for a side and rear setback variances to the
t[ediun Density Uulti-fanily zone distrlct on Lot 20,
Bighorn Terrace (4247 Colunbine Way)Applicant: John and Enid Nilsson
r.DESCRIPTION OF THE VARIANCE REOUESTED
The applicant is the owner of Unlt 2o l-n the Bighorrr Terrace
subdivision which is located on Colunbine Way. The existing
duptex unit consists of approximately 706 sq. ft. of GRFA
and has an allowed GRFA of 559 sg. ft. under lifediun Density
Multi-Farnily (UDMF) zoning.
The applicant is reguesting a variance fron the 20 ft. side
and rear setback requireraent to allow for the construction
of a 101.25 sq. ft. addition on the north side of the
building. The addition will involve adding a 81.25 sq. ft.
dining area and a 20 sq.ft. storage area on the rear of the
building. The variance request is for an 11 ft.
encroachment into the 2o ft. rear setback and a 15 ft.
encroachment in to the 20 ft. side yard setback.
BACKGROUND
Bighorn Terrace is a nonconforming subdivision because it
nas annexed into the Town and zoned !'tD!'lF after it was
established. Under the llDIrlF zoning, 20 ft. setbacks on the
front, rear and sides were imposed on the existing lots.
Unit 20 currently encroaches 8 ft. into the rear setback and
12 ft. into the side setback at the second level . These
imposed setbacks greatly liroit the locations of possible
additions which would not require setback variances. The
applicant has also applied for additional GRFA (25o sq- ft- )
unaer Section 18.?1.020 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
II
s
I
Recently, both the PEC and the Town Council have reviewed a setback request for Unit 7 located in this same subdivision.
In addition to the setback variance, the applicant also
received approval for an additional 250 sq. ft. of GRFA as
allowed under Section 18.71.O2o of the Vail Municipal Code.
The staff recomnended denial of the variance request on the basis that the variance vould be a grant of special privilege in that there are no exceptions or extraordinary
circurnstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties
in the same zone distrLct. However, the PEC approved the
request by a vote of 7-O statJ.ng that indeed the applied
UDMF Zoning was a hardship for this property. The PEC also
commented that the addition made sense in this location since 3Lr would remain between buildings after the addition.
The Town council also reviewed this item and approved it by
a vote of 5-O siting again the hardship being the imposed zoning. They directed the Planning Staff to investigate
zoning code changes that would take into account the unigue
situation in relation to the setback in the Bighorn Terrace
Subdivision. This reconmendation is based on a review of previous variances and the desire to naintain a reasonable
distance between buildings.
The staff has not yet amended the code, however we have made
a prelininary decision that would a1low for 7.5 ft. setback
requirements and that would thus insure a ninimum distance
between buitdings of 15 feet. Most of the units already
encroach into the setbacks and are situated at various
angles on each lot. Each unit norrnally has a Party wal-l but
is actually located on a separate 1ot. It nay also be
appropriale to reduce, if not elininate, the setback from
the int€r\or property line i.e. party wall . Staff believes
this approach treat property otrners fairly regardless of
when they decide to expand and insures a reasonable amount
of separation between units.
We also discussed the option of reguiring a minimum distance
bethreen buildings. ft was decided that this requirement
favored property owners that expanded first and nade it
difficult for adjacent proPerties to expand in the future.
III. CRTTERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon revLew of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.o60 of
the vail Municipal Code, the Department of ConrnunLty
Developnent reconnends denial of the requested variance
based upon the followlng factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
the vicinitv.
The 101.25 sq. ft. addition in the proposed
location should not create any problems to existing or potential uses or structure in the
vicinity. The property nost likely to be inpacted
would be Lot 15 to the rear and lot 21 to the west. llhe existing building encroaches 8r into
the 2o ft. rear Eetback and is approxinately 22 ft. fron unit 15 to the rear. It encroaches l-2 ft. lnto the side setback at the second level and
is approxinately 17 ft. fron Unit 21 to the west.
The requested variance will allow the corner of
the proposed first story addition to be within g
ft. of the rear property line and 5 ft. of the
west property line. The resulting distance
between buildings would be 19 ft. between unit 15
and 20. There would be no significant change in
the distance between units 21 and 20.
The degree to which relief from the strict and
literal interpretation and enforcenent of a
specified recrulation is necessary to achieve
The lot is greatly linited by the inposed
setbacks. Hortever, the staff feels that the
proposed addition will not maintain the mininum
setLack of 7.5 ft. that the staff is reqornnending
as a guideline.
Over the past 13 years there have been 9 reguests for setback variances in the Bigltorn Terrace
Subdivision. of the 9, 4 have been reconmended for denial and all have been subseguently approved
by the PEC. The fotlowing details the activity in
this area:
1.
2.
comoatl-bilitv and unifornitv of treatrnent amoncr
VARIANCE REQUEST HISTORY OF BIGHORN TERRACE SUBDTVISION
TYPE OF AI{OUNT OF STAT'F PEC DATE APPLICANT REOUEST VARIANCE RECOUMENDATION ACTION
Ylar 77 Benysh 13O sq. ft.8 ft.Approval
Approval
DeniaI
DeniaI
Denial
Denial
Approval
Denial
Denial
Approval
Approval
Denial
Denial
Denial
Approval
Denial
Approval
Denial
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Tabled
Tabled
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
Denial*
Approval
APProvedit,(
GRFA
Setback
GRFA 473
Setback
GRFA 75 sq.Setback 8
Setback 7 Aug 78 Turnbull
Aug 80 Curfman
Aug 82 Odum
Sept 82 Odum
May 78
July 78
Nov 83
Feb 85
June 85
Rowe
Alder
Houston
Sherr
Nicholson
GRFA
GRFA
Setback
Setback
177 sq. ft.
122 sq. ft.
18 ft.
18 ft.
sg.
7.5
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
April 90 Benysh
for airlock
GRFA 80 sq. ft.
Setback f.6 ft.
GRFA 5O sq. ft.3 setbacks 3, 11, 13 ft.
GRFA 395 sq. ft.
Setback (adding 3rd floor)
Setback L5 feet rear
13 feet side
The applicant modified the application to conform to the requirernents of Section l-8.7L.O2O and received an allowance for an additional 250
sg. ft. of GRFA.
** Received allowance for allowance 250 sq. ft. under Section 18.7L.020.
3. The effect of the recruested varl-ance on light and
Staff finds that the request will not have any
significant effect upon any of the above
consideratlons.
IV. TINDINGS
The Planninq and EnvLronmental Connission shall nake the
followincr findincrs before qrantlncr a variance:
A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of speci.al privilege Lnconsistent with the limitations on other properties classlfied in the aane district.
B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrinental to the public health, safety or welfare, or
rnaterially injurious to properties or inprovements in the vicinity.
c. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the
following reasons:
1. The strict literal interpretation or enforcenent of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
2. There are exceptions or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not appty generally
to other properties in the same zone.
3. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the
specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privlleges enjoyed by the owners of other properties ln the same distrlct.
air. distribution of oopulation, transportation
and traffic facllities. public facilitles and utllities. and public Eafetv.
v.STAFF RECOI'{IIIENDATION
Staff recommendation is for denial of the reguest for a 15
ft. encroachment into the 20 ft. side setback requirement
and 11 ft. encroachment into the 20 ft. rear setback
iequiienent. Staff acknowledges that other properties int
he'aigtrorn Terrace Subdivision have received setback
variaices and therefore this variance request is not a grant
oi special privitege. The-staff feels that although there
ai" i*""pti-ons or txtraordinary conditions applicable to Lot
20 which-do not generally apply to other pfopertles in the
ri^" ,on" distri6t, a roiiriniln letback should be nal.ntained
in order to gparanfee a mininun distance between buildings
io itt"n"" puStic health, safety, and welfare as well as the
fair treatnent of all property olf,ners within Bighorn
Terrace. The proposea-aahition will encroach 15 ft. into
the side setbalk iltricfr is not an accePtable rninimurn to the
slaff. If in fact the PEc aPProves the variance reguests'
the staff feels it is appropiiate to reguire the applicant
to ,rtta"rqround their eflltrical service from ttre service
pole to unit 2o.
Lt!.JlT :.5
€. .7s, 4o', E
-l )cul-
tJh
tf)
a a
=o \J
\t
C\I
0
a
(r)
a o
1\
KJ
o
C\J
\f
ro
o
o)v
e
i,r',"#:!-.' ::..':'!- .'......ji t.' ! t:.:
z't '-'ffirW
-, EI t- J- --N '- -..rElfNE
^Aa ataJt-
ffitFo')
+Ldf b Lor,tFueTet(
A^H?D bt ggrntzs-
rwlee Dutuotd& LoL*1@
tt-.|-Aersaz1-
YJ
tq v
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GMN that the Deslgn Revlew Board of the Tonn of Val1
w111 hold a publlc hearing on July lil' 1990 at 3:00 p.n. 1n the Town of
Val1 Munlcipal" Bulldlng.
Conslderation of:
l. A request for addltlonal 205 of Gross Resldentlal Floor
area for Nllsson at 4247 Colunblne Drlve #20, Btghorn
Terrace .
Appllcant: John F. and Enld Nilsson
The appllcations and LnfornatLon about the proposals are aval.lable
ln the zoning adminletratorrs offlce durlng regular office hours for
public inspectl-on.
TOM{ OF VAIL
COMMI]NITY DEVELOPMENT
Publlshed ln the Vall-
DEPARTMENT
Tral1 on June 29, 1990.
\\,'. -t'l\ ,tr} \5, \-$\,\\L-
\'-j
l -r. ',.;yr\=.\' r'-'\r \rii t-
Neu, gu*ing East Vieur
B'0'---+4 4'-+5'2'-+
Keep eristiag 2X10 flmr ioists aad replace
rim n'ith double 2Xl2's
I
I
OT
=(t g
o
{
&Barbo to Maflh
10" pier with 4 {four} # 4 rebar
Scale l/,1" = l'
o
New Buildtng South View
o
l:
I
E'0'
j
l
rn txt H
Storage Shed
T
Glassblo<
0-
I
I
I
I t
Storage Shed
Scale 1/4" -l'
10" pier vith 4(four) *4 rebar
DrPlP6
1**
Ltuil{4Room
I
I
1t4"
I
,1,
fr6T FLNZ
?tAn
t
I
8b'
S,AG t/4',= I "
ileA
Present Floor Plan
+
I
I
I
I
I
I
B'0'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Y
a F}o Ft
sr GI o
t 44'
I
5'2'
I
Scate l/{" -l'
o
Present, Building South Viev
la'7'
trT
tFt
0'
lr
Board &Ba
Sidisg
E'0'
I
I
I
I
I t
7'3'_+
Cantilevered deck
tr
Present Builjling East View I
f
I
I
I
E'0'
E' 0' ------+ 4 4' ++ 5' 2'+
Windov to be removed aod space left as valktirough from
nev addition to kitcheu.
Scale l/{" - l'
Floor Fram t lng
Double 2Xl0 Rin Flush
Scale: 1/2" - l'
Double 2Xl0
o
Rin Fl
2X10 t6"
Roof Franing 2Xl0 facia !o Match Eristing Buildiag
10" ovorhaog
lE" overiang
Liae of Buildiog
Bclov
Scale l/{"= l'
!-t!..!i'r
35'4C
rri
FOUND PIN AND CAP PE-LS 2183
56.93 co (o
r__ 30 42
f-r,', ".,,n
)
-q-g.72-
, .'j. .. r': '
N\''\..'-.-.\
o
t\N
tr1
N
v
o
s+
a
tr)
f\'.
a ro
NPIE MONUMENTATION IN THIS AREA IS EXTREMELY POOR. THIS SURVEY IS BASED IN PART IN PART ON RICHARDS ENGINEERING SURVEYS OF 1978,v8- 2 t7 AND V8- t25.
\
a\
c\
v
c!
o
l^
:'.ii".i.!- ;;t1
\
\
I
t--P-
\
o a \t
_..
Iherebycertlfychatchlsl4rovernElocacloncerttflcaBewaepreparedforthe
lortSage lender rnd the tltle lnsurance coEPany' rher 1t i3 not a land survey plat
orlryroveEencsurveyplac,andt'hrtlttsnocroberelteduponforthcesrablteh-
oenr of fence, bul1d1il;-;; oitrer f,rt.rre l'prove*nt llnes. I furcher certlfv chat
che luproveoenta on rhl abovc deacrlbed parcel on Ehls d8te, GxceP! utlllty con-
oection3r are enrlrely wlthln the bouodarlea of the prrcel' crccPt al ahoun' that
chere are no encroechoGncs upon the degcrlbed prellees_by hproveenta on any ad-
Joinlng Prellaea, .*..pi-"" iodlcared, and thal th€re It no 'PParent evldencc or
algn of any eeaeoant croeslng or burdenlng any Part of arld parccl' €xccpt ar noted'
Thle certlftcrle do€a not conatltutc a cltle aearch by Inter-Hountaln BoglneerlnS'
to delcrulne osnerghlp or caaeBnts of record. For ell lnforcatlon regardtng.
eeaemntr, rtghtc-of Jay or rttle of record, Inter-llountaln Englnecrlng relled
upon rrre linot PLaT oF EtaHoRN TERRACE, VAtL,COLORADO
;--'1 r-1 l--"r
;--l b*r , ! '1, /t1
'ED7-E- 9F ' '
Fo')6fw Bri an R. L. S.
B,NE NOTICE: According to Colorado lar' you nust colilEnce
any leqal actlon based upon any defect ln thls sutrey
rlthin-three yetrs after you flrst dlscover such defect.
In no eyent, may any actlon based upon such defect ln
thls survqy be cosnenced nore than ten years ftu the
date of the certlflcatlon shonn hcrcon.
1
\
o
3;lo"S'?lL^, 'o^o llnter-Mountain ,:::';^,13:iI$!H"3i3'" lAEngineeringlrd. '*"o?;:ft3i::?::
' OATE ifvts|ofis I M PROVEM E NT LOCAT IO N C E RT I F I C AT E rrqrlgt h ggtSs
UNIT 20, BIGHORN TERRACE, TOWN OF
VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
rut "'' DEA urE rD'4_29_gg
r}IcED frt BTK *tt'1,,=!e'
w229 nDtSK 57 .orb toFl
Appl i cati on
PEC MEETING
APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE
'{i. '
variance. The application
DATE
I.This
will
A.
procedure is required for
not be accepted unti] all
NAME OF APPLICANT tr. 4 r=nru tr/ lc
any project
i nformati on
requesting a is submitted.
ADDRESS P. o 15ox tb t^vt) L
112-41 Caeornbty. -J;r.ttte -#'zo PHoNE q76- q8sc1
B.NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE Snrag
ADDRESS
PHONE
c.NAME OF OWNER(S)
Si qnatur
ADDRESS
ype pri nt )
PHONE
D.LOCATiON
ADDRESS
OF PROPOSAL 6KtlDt2D T€R-2.A(E
6)t*. TelrE ;Cotu
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT BLOCK FILING
E.FEE $IOO PAID "/CK #__pg5p_ FROM
THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE
YOUR PROPOSAL.
COI'1MUN I TY DEVELOPM DEPARTMENT }IILL ACCEPT
F. A ljst of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the subject property
INCLUDING PR0PERTY BEHIN0 AND ACR0SS STREETS, and their mailing addresses.
THE APPLICANT I.IILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES.
II. A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE t^lITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED
TO 'DETERMINE IF ANY'ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED. NO APPLICATION l,,ILL BE
ACCEPTED UNLESS IT IS COMPLETE (MUST INCLUDE ALL ITEMS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR). IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIEILITY TO I"IAKE AN APPOINTMENT
I.IITH THE STAFF TO FINO OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION l.lILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR
YOUR PROJECT gV OECREASING THE NUT1BTR OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING
AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MAY STIPULATE. ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE
COMPLIED l.lITH BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSnm-.
III. FOUR (4) COPiES OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED:
A. A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTED AND THE
REGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS:
l. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and structures in the vicinity.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or'l iteral 'interpretation and
enforcement of a-specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility
and uniformity of treatment among sjtes in the vicinjty or to attain the
objectives of this title without grant of special privi'lege.
3. The effect of the varjance on light and air, distnibution of popu'l ation'
transportation, traffic facilities, utilities, and pub'l ic safety.
o Vari a nce
4. How your request complies with Vail's Comprehensive plan.
B. A topographic gnd/or improvement survey at-a sca'le of at-least l. - 20' stamped by a Colorado-licensed surveyor including locations of a'l 'l existinq irorou"-ments, inc'luding grades and elevations. Other e'lements whicn must'd 5ir;;;are_parking and-loading areas, ingress and egress, landscpped
"""as ind '.
utility and drainage features.
C. A sfte pl an at a sca'le of at least'l " = 20' showing existing and proposed
bui I di ngs.
D. All prefiminary building elevations and f'loor plans sufficient to indicate
the dimensions' general appearance, scale and use of all buildings and spaces existing and proposed.on the site.
E. A preliminary title report to verify ownership and easements
F. If the proposal is located in a multi-family development which has a homeowners'association, then wrjtten approval from the association in support of the projebt must be received by a duly authorized agent for said iisociation.
G. Any additional material necessary for the review of the application as determined by the zoning administrator..
* Folinterior modifications, an improvement survey and site p'lan may be
waived by the zoning administrator.
IV.Time Requirments
The P'l anning and Environmental Commission meets of each month. A complete application form and
(as described above) must be submitted a minimum
PEC public hearing. No 'incomplete applications
administrator) will be accepted by the planning
nated submi tta'l date.
on the 2nd and 4th l.londays all accompanying material
of 4 weeks prior to the date of the (as determined by the zoning staff before or after the desig-
?
l\ Houston. John s. & llargaret c. l/ ctranters, John o & Barbafa 8. 13 curf*n, ceorge H. Jr. & Hop€ G.
34Zi cl.ubheights Court 195 Hest Point Road 20 E[m stfeet
cotorado springs, co 80906 Tonka Bay, n 55531 Denver, co 80220
lq Lubchenco, Alexis E. l6rurnOutf, Ratph tl. & Eeverty Ann lbengt,"W, Thomas ,
?50 Kearney g. Btock, Det H. & Ann Etizsbeth 1p, 2314 Briarhurst Dr.
Denver, Co 80220 1747 tloodlark llightards Ranch, Co 80126
Lexington Ky 40505
tq |'Halterflam, Frederick tl. -
Napotetan. Jitt c.
Box 2631
vai t, co 81658
4,,.P ri tssm, Enid
Box 880353
Stesfiboat springs, co 80477
a4 I "Alder, Rob€rt J. & Diane 14.-
i\ ravror, a.e . Sskotasinski, Joseph c. & Lauraine broo"., Linda Schirdet
,6 Rensvotd, Jean, Legal Dept. Bor 2285 gox 1277
HaLliburton services, Drarer 143 Vait, Co 81558 vait. Co 81658
Duncan. Ok 8536
v
Jf cauch. Judi th A.
Z lunter Savings Associ at i on
7840 l,lontgomery Rd.
cincinatti, 0h 45236
ft ' chapis, Anne T.-Ronzio, Etizabeth
S Box 2807
vai t, co 81658
ol ' Lteret tyn, [eal-HockmJth. Richard
M Gardner, James- Barnes, Arthur <) 11oz North Dubuq.re
loHa Ci ty, la 52210
'11)
''Penlard, Kenneth V. & Janet E.-
Detrich, LaHrence c. & |(eLty E.
I Pentand, 899 Peart #16
Denver, Co 80205
--' Taytor, B.G.
X Rensvold. Jean, Legat Dept.
lial t iburtofl Services, 0rarer 143
Duncan, 0k 6536
q
I Odrm, Johnnie D, & Deborah E.
4705 osage D rive
Boutder, Co 80301
ll\ J nore, Gordon & Barbara
4275 East cotwbine t.lay
Vai l, Co 81657
,4
I t sherr. Hoxard P. & Virginia
210 sumi t Btvd.
Englerood, co 80110
0/ sto"k*r,Ied P. & suzanne H.
1700 Boradray, Suite 1800
Denver, Co 80290
Riordan, Robert fi.
19 Drury Lane
Berketey, ce 94705
3350 south Atbian
Denver. Co 80222
'lX stockrar, Ted P. & suzanne H.
1700 Boradray. Suite 1800
Denver, Co 80290
D t*kin", carolyn sue
Grant, Jon g.
Box 792
llanitou Springs, Co 80829
* *t"in,l,tary Etten & 11. Spencer-
4472 East Lake Circte ilorth
Littteton, Co 80121
Strunk, Gordon E(tery- lJaters, Jo Hurtt, l.{ichae[ H. & Kaye L.
,lt't f- Stockmar, Ted P. & Suzanne H,
1700 Borad*ay, Suite 1800
Denver, Co 80290
A
'I e"ny"h, Kathryn Ruth
4242 E, Col.wbine Road
Vai t, Co 81657
O,'IIER SII,II{ RY REPORT f OR:
PROPERTY DESCR I PT IOII ultlT l{tt{BER( s )
ASSESSED EST II,IATED
v LU Tto[ t{xT.v LUE
Sighorn Terrace condo.unit (A)
Unit I
unit l0
unit 11
unit 12
Unit 13
unit 14
Unit 15
unit 16
unit 17
Unit 18
Unit 19
Unit 2
Unit 20
Unit 21
Unit 22
Unit 23
Unit 24
unit 25
Unit 25
unit 3
Unit 4
Uni t 5
Unit 6
Unit 7
Unit I
Unit 9
13,500 *,375
13,350 83,438
13,350 83,438
13,350 83,4:t8
13,350 83,4:18
13,350 83.438
15,Z7O 95,458
13,350 83,438
13,350 83,458
13,J50 83,458
13,350 85,438
13,350 83,438
13,350 83,438
13,350 8r:t,438
13,350 88,458
13,350 83,438
13,350 83,438
13,350 83,438
13,350 83,438
13,350 83,458
13,350 83,438
15,350 83,438
15,350 83,438
?4,050 150,313
15,350 83,438
10,010 6?,563
't 5,350 83,438
369,880 2,311 ,763
OTiIER SUI{.IARY REPORT FOR:
PREERTY DESCRIPTIOII ultT [nBER(s)
ASSESSED ESTTI'IATEII
v tuATtfl KT.V LtE
Bighorn lcrrrc! Condo.lhl t (A)
ttri t t
thi t l0
thit 11
lrni t 12
ttri t tf,
tlri t 14
thi t 15
llri t 15
unit 17
thi t 18
lrni t 19
thit 2
Unit 20
t nit 21
Unit 22
Unit 23
Unit 24
Unit 2'
Unit 25
lrni t 5
Unit 4
lhit 5
lrni t 6
unit 7
urit I
thit 9
15,500 U,t75
13,350 88,4:18
13,350 8B,gg
13,550 85,458
15,550 8C,4:18
13,350 88,438
15,270 95,4n
13,550 89,4t8
13,350 EC,438
15,350 88,4:t8
15,550 88,4:t8
15,550 S,438
$,350 8t,4t8
t3,350 8:t,438
13,350 85,458
t3,t50 8tr,438
13,350 8S,4r8
13,350 85,458
13,350 83,4:t8
13,350 8!1,{38
r5,t50 8i1,438
13,350 88,438
13,350 8!1,438
?4,050 150,313
13,350 8C,436
10,010 62,563
11,350 88,4:t6
:t60,8&l 2,311,763
REAL BSTATE
May 25, 1990
Memo: Town of Vail
Planning and Zoning Commiss j-on
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
The following is a written statement in cornpliance with rten
III., Application for a Variance, dated May 25, 1990.
The purpose of the requested variance is to aIlow the
enclosure of an existing open deck area on the north/west corner
of my duplex home at 4247 columbine Drive, west 1/2. The r"restern
most edge of the existing deck is located approximately 5r from the
side property line and, as such, encroaches into the side yard set
back.
The home is located in the Bighorn Terrace project which is
a clustering of smaller duplex structures built over 20 years ago
before Town of vaif zoning was j-n force in the Bighorn Subdivision.
T understand that the current zoning on the property is MDMF
(Mediurn Density Multiple Farnily). The zoning is in conflict with
the current usage which could be more closely defined as Two Fanily
Residential . There is no formal Condorniniurn Association in effect in the project. A11 other structures in the immediate area are of
this duplex configuration. The variance will have no effect on
other existing or potential- uses and structures in the irnmediate
vicinity as i-t is exactly sirnilar to those existing or potential
uses.
The variance will allow encl-osure of an existing deck area
that currently is within 5tof the side yard property line. The
enclosure w1l1 not extend the current encroachment any further into
the setback, nor will any of the new structure protrude or project
farther than the existing deck or any existing roof line. The
enclosure will add less than the allowed 250 Sq. Ft. of additional
GRFA allowed to be added to buildi.ngs wj-th which have had permanent
certificates of occupancy for over 5 years. Because of the positioning of the building and the location of the proposed deck
enclosure on the site, the proposed enclosure will remain more than
D
VACATION PROPERTIES NETWORK
0082 E. Beaver Creek Blvd. . Drawer 917 . Avon, C0 81620 . (303)9494560
D 286 Bridse Street . !hil, C0 81657 . (303 r4764854
2ot from any other structure. This distance is well in excess of
the distances separating several other sinilar enclosures which
have already been allowed and constructed in the project. As many
of the owners of the duplex homes in Bighorn Terrace have already
rnade this nodification to their homes, cornpatibility and uniformity
of treatment among sites in the vicinity will be enhanced and no
granting of special privilege will result from the granting of thls
variance.
The requested variance will have no effect on light and air,
distribution of populatj-on. transportation, traffic facilities,
utilities, and public safety.
Nilsson
REAL ESIATE
May 25, I99O
Memo: Town of Vail
Planning and Zoning Commission
Dear Ladies and centl-emen:
The following is a written statement in compliance with Itern
IfI., Application for a Variance, dated t'tIay 25, I99o.
The purpose of the requested variance is to aflow the
enclosure of an existing open deck area on the north/wes1i- corner of my duplex home at 4247 Colu:mbine Drive, WesL I/2. The western
nost edge of the existing deck is located approximately 5r from the
side property line and, as such, encroaches into the side yard set
back.
The horne is located in the Bighorn Terrace project which is a clustering of smaller duplex structures buil-t over 20 years ago
before Town of VaiI Zoning was in force in the Bighorn Subdivision.f understand that, the current zonlng on the property j-s MDMF
(Mediurn Densi-ty Multiple Family). The zoning is in conflict with
the current usage which could be more closel-y defined as Two Fanily
Residential. There is no formal Condominium Association i-n effect
in the project. A11 other structures in the irnmediate area are of
this duplex configuration. The variance will have no effect on
other existing or potential uses and structures j-n the irnrnedi-ate
vicinity as it is exactly sirnilar to those existing or potentj-al
uses.
The variance wiII al1ow enclosure of an existing deck area
that currently is within 5'of the side yard property line. The
enclosure will not extend the current encroachment any further into
the setback, nor will any of the new structure protrude or project
farther than the existing deck or any existing roof line. The
enclosure will add less than the allowed 250 Sq. Ft. of additional
GRFA allowed to be added to buil-dings with which have had permanent
certificates of occupancy for over 5 years. Because of the positioning of the building and the location of the proposed deck
enclosure on the site, the proposed enclosure will remain more than
VACATION PROPERTIES NETWORK
0082 E. Bearer Creek Blvd. . Drawer 917 . Avon, C0 81620. (303)949.4560
! 286 Bridse Street . \hil. C0 8165i . (303)1i6 4851
n
zot from any other structure. This distance is well in excess of
the distances separating several other similar enclosures which
have already been allowed and constructed in the project. As many
of the owners of the duplex homes in Bighorn Terrace have already
rnade this rnodification to their homes, cornpatibility and uniforrnity
of treatment among sites in the vicinity will be enhanced and no
granting of special pri.vilege will result from the granting of this
variance.
The requested variance wiII have no effect on lighL and air,
distribution of population, transportation, traffic facilities,
utiLities, and public safety.
REAL ESIATE
May 25, 1,990
Memo: Town of Vail
Planning and Zoning Commission
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
The fol"lowing is a written staternent in compliance wj-th Ttem
III., Application for a Variance, dated May 25, 1990.
The purpose of the requested variance is to al1ow the
enclosure of an existing open deck area on the north,/west corner
of my duplex home at 4247 Columbine Drive, West L/2. The western
most edge of the existing deck is located approxirnatefy 5 r from the
si-de property line and, as such, encroaches into the side yard set
back.
The horne is located in the Bighorn Terrace project which is
a clustering of smaller duplex structures buj-It over 20 years ago
before Town of Vail Zoning was in force in the Bighorn Subdivision.
I understand that the current zoning on the property 1s MDMF
(Mediun Density Multiple namily). The zoning is in conflict with
the current usage which could be more closely defined as Two Pamily
Residential. There is no formal Condominium Association in effect
in the project. A11 other structures i.n the immediate area are of
this duplex configuratj-on. The variance will have no effect on
other existing or potential uses and structures in the immediate
vicinity as it is exactly similar to those existing or potential
uses.
The variance will allow enclosure of an existing deck area
that currently is within 5tof the side yard property line. The
enclosure will not extend the current encroachment any further into
the setback, nor will any of the new structure protrude or project
farther than the existing deck or any existing roof line. The
enclosure will add less than the allowed 250 sq. Ft. of additional
GRFA allowed to be added to buildings with which have had permanent
certificates of occupancy for over 5 years. Because of the positioning of the buj-lding and the location of the proposed deck
enclosure on the site, the proposed enclosure will remain more than
VACATION PROPI RTIES NETWORK
0082 E. Beaver Creek Blvd. . Drarier 917 . Avon. C0 81620 . (303i9494560
! 286 Bridse Street . \hil. C0 81657 . (303)476-4854
n
2ot from any other structure. This distance is well in excess of
the distances separating several other similar enclosures which
have already been allowed and constructed in the project. As many
of the owners of the duplex homes in Bighorn Terrace have already
made this modification to their homes, cornpatibility and uniformity
of treatment among sites in the vicinity will be enhanced and no
granting of special privitege will result from the granting of this
variance.
The requested variance will ha.re no effect on light and air,
distribution of population, transportation, traffic facilities,
util-ities, and public safety.
REAL ESIATE
May 25, L990
Memo: Town of Vail
Planning and Zoning Commission
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
The following is a written statement in cornpliance with Item
III., Application for a Variance, dated May 25, L99O.
The purpose of the requested variance is to al1ow the
enclosure of an existing open deck area on the north/west corner
of rny duplex home at 4247 Columbine Drive, west L/2. The western
rnost edge of the existing deck is located approximately 5r from the
side property line and, as such, encroaches into the side yard set
back.
The horne is l-ocated in the Bighorn Terrace project which is a clustering of smaller duplex structures built over 20 years ago
before Town of VaiI Zoning was in force in the Bighorn Subdj-vision.
I understand that the current zoning on the property is MDMF
(Mediurn Density Multiple Family). The zoning is in conflict with
the current usage which could be more closely defined as Two Family
Residential. There is no formal Condominium Association in effect
in the project. A11 other structures in the inmediate area are of
this duplex configuration. The varj-ance will have no effect on
other existing or potential uses and structures in the irnmediate
vicinity as it is exactly sinilar to those existing or potential
The variance will allow enclosure of an existi-ng deck area
that currently is within 5rof the side yard property line. The
enclosure will not extend the current encroachment any further into the setback, nor will any of the new structure protrude or project
farther than the existing deck or any existing roof l-ine. The
enclosure will add l-ess than the allowed 250 Sq. Ft. of additional
GRFA a1l-owed to be added to buildings with whj-ch have had permanent
certificates of occupancy for over 5 years. Because of the positioning of the building and the location of the proposed deck
enclosure on the site, the proposed enclosure will remain more than
VACATION PROPERTIES NETWORK
0082 E. Beaver Creek Blvd. . Drawer 917 . Avon, C0 61620. (303)949.4560
! 286 Bridge Street . \hil, C0 81657 . (303)176 4851
n
20' from any other structure. This distance is well in excess of
the distances separating several other similar enclosures which
have already been allowed and constructed in the project. As many
of the owners of the duplex hones in Bighorn Terrace have already
made this modification to their homes, compatibility and uniforrnity
of treatment among sites in the vicinity will be enhanced and no
granting of special privilege wil-l result from the granting of this
variance.
The requested variance will have no effect on light and air,
distribution of population, transportation, traffic facilities'
utilities, and public safety.
erely
To: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM:
DATE:
Community Development Department
June 25, L99O
SUBJECT: A reguest for a side and rear setback variances to the
Medium Density Multi-farnily zone district on Lot 20'
Bighorn Terrace (4247 Colunbine Way)
Applicant: John and Enid Nilsson
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE VARTANCE REOUESTED
The applicant is the owner of Unit 20 in the Bighorn Terrace
subdivision which is located on Colurnbine lilay. The existing
duplex unit consists of approximately 706 sq. ft. of GRFA
and has an allowed GRFA of 659 sq. ft. under UDMF zoning.
The applicant is requesting a variance from the 20t side and
rear setback requirement to allow for the construction of a
l-ol-.25 sq. ft. addition on the north side of the building.
The addition will involve adding 81.25 sq. ft. dininq area
and 20 sq.ft. storage area on the rear of the building. The
variance reguest is for a Ll-r encroachment into the 20r rear
setback and a L5r encroactunent in to the 20r side yard
setback.
BACKGROUND
Bighorn Terrace is a nonconforming subdivision because it
was annexed into the Town after it was platted. Under the
MDMF zoning, 2or setbacks on the front, rear and sides were
imposed on the existing 1ots. Unit 20 currently encroaches
8 r into the rear setback and 12 | into the side setback at
the second level . These irnposed setbacks greatly lirnit the
Iocations of possible additions which would not require
setback variances. The applicant has also applied for
additional GRFA (250 sq. ft.1 under Section l-8.71.0f0 of the
Town of Vail Municipal Code. L
Y
S,ecently, both the PEC and the Town Council haws reviewed a
II.
qp,^,
YN Ir
a +$
$'i drs
il "t v t\=* v,, t\t-r $
t.
B.
nt alonct site3 in e r'ithout
sP9clqr p
Setbact Yariances
Staff feels that due to the existing buildingr it vould not be a special privilege to grant the variances for setback8 as the setback encroachments will not be any greater than those existing encroachments.
GRFA Variance
Staff feels that it would be a grant of special privilege to approve this GRFA variance. The foLloving chart shovs var j.ance requests in Bighorn Terrace have been approved:
VARIANCE RIQUTST H]STORY OF BIGHORN TERRACE SUBDIVISiON
TYPE OF
DATE AP PL I CANT
AI4OUNT OF
VAP. i ANC E
STT.FF PEC
RECCi.iilEi,iDATiON ACT]ON
t
I
I
l
I
I
I
REQUEST
l4ar 77 Benysh
I'lay 78 Rowe
July 78 A'lder
130 sq ft 8ft
473 sq ft
/\ <n lt rv vrt ,v
o€!
177 sq
122 s9 '18 ft
l8 ft
80 sq ft
1F f i
Approvai
Approvai
Den i aI
Denial
Den i al
Den i al
Approval
Deni al
ueniaI
Approval
App rova 1
Den ial
Oen i al
Deni a I
App rov a I w4
AV.V"ry^!
Turnbul I Setback
Curfman GRFA
Approva l
App rov a I
Approval
Approva I
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approvai
Tabl e
Approval
Approva 1
Approval
Approval
Approva I
d),- ca("Wry
GRFA
Se'uba c k
GRFA
Setback
lJ|1fA
Setback
Aug
Aug
Aug
ft
ft
78
80
82
Sep 82
Nov 83
Feb ll
uifA
Setback
5e'uback for
Airlock
0dum
0dum
Houston GRFA
Setbac k
srrerr Lu*10 eRrR 5o sq ft
3 Setbacks 3,1 .| , & 13 ft
fiA^\L ltbj tJ rct+-olt*otw #f* ^ff^u,,]y y*,
lhe chart indicates that approving the
AndrY4 l{.r M
- : tt a'b e.M-*Wrwra
setback variances woufd not be e grant of special privilege. Hosever, it does shov that approving the GRFA variance would be a grant of special privilege due to the large amount of GRFA. There have been 13 requests for additionaL GRFA. The staff recommended approval
oq'v't @d@
rear setback and is approxiqtrlely 22 r ft{m unit rs to the rear. It encroaches'T,I into the-side
III. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section L8.62.060 of
the Vail Municipal Code, the Departrnent of Conmunity
Development recommends denial of the requested variance
based upon the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. The reLationship of the requested variance to
other existing or potential uses and structures in
the vicinitv.
The 101.25 sq. ft. addition in the proposed
location should not create any problems to
existing or potential uses or structure in the
vicinity. The property nost likely to be irnpact-eQ tn(Lo would be Lot LSrthe rear and lot 21 to the west( "[ *
The existing building encroaches 8r into the 201
setbackr and is approxinately 17t from Unit 21 to - the west. The requestpd variance will allow the
.u corner of the proposed'etory addition to be within
- .^y1 "0. g r of the rear property line ?nq 5r of the west..,
.^"r1 A,^#-.J*'t orooattv line. flL 'dtnnl't-r*q. aJ<.|-a/e\<L bttulo"'- U,'^"l$"qi
ce',. . { -aI- :^;17-bi :i'6,;',;- ,;;'""ny @ a^,--a 1a. r**-Irutc ntc'w-I-^ 6{-'
. q t\ --t-.---2.,,^{i :/ ^f" 2. the degree to which relief frorn the strict and " i*'\r* literal interpretation and enforcement of a \P Ot' W Il-EeraI lnEerpreEaELon anq enrorcemenE oI a '."..^" |) specified regulation is necessarv to achieve
v'J ,^P/ compatibilitv and uniforrnity of treatment among
\,1 ' sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives
of this title without grant of special privileqe.
The lot is greatly tirnited by the imposed
setbacks. However, the staff feels that the
proposed addition wiII not maintain rni**nat t\L r'\il^/ir"\'rr/w
' .-t4^ )'- .li1^-+ .t-- ^*- G l'r,) )4i*rgs . tJrbo4l-B I'1^4+ t':''-r/f "qft'
;dL,
,d*' \P
/ n,{' r.(pr-l'*"'
for denial and all have been subsequently approved
by the PEC. Th.c Vr,vLnvvt/"fr dLto';l$ f"/ ^<hV\kv1 V tL'1"'\ 't<tr;
-v vi
over the past J-3 years
for setback variances Subdivision. of the 8, 5 have been recommended
The effect of the requested variance on light and
air, distribution of population. transportation
and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities. and public safetv.
Staff finds that the request will not have any
significant effect upon any of the above
considerations.
there have been &Y.qrr.=t=in the Bighorn Tdlrace
IV. FINDTNGS
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a
grant of special privilege inconsistent with the
lirnitations on other properties classified in the same
district.
That the granting of the variance will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety or welfarer or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in
the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the
following reasons:
1. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement
of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this
title.
2. There are exceptions or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the same
site of the variance that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same zone.
3. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the
specified regulation would deprive the applicant
of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the same district.
STAFF RECO},TUENDATION
Staff recommendation is for denial of the request for a L5 |
encroachrnent into the 20r side setback requirement and 111
encroachment into the 2Or rear setback requirement. The
staff feels that although there are exceptions or
extraordinary conditions applicable to Lot 2o which do not
generally apply to other properties in the same zone
district, that a minimum setback should be naintained in
order to guarantee a minimum amount of distance between
buildings.,41 The proposed addition will encroach L5r into
the side ststback which is not an acceptable minimum to the
r
\+6wrcr,1.k i^ Q*,* *t,tr ftU A-WrwcS ttq Vazvt'a,.w.ct-<' , +1^-g 1+a.EL hrrn*d Q,d< ;{-' ' ..- ^ ^ ^,^^^;, t-.. t ,hfiI hrrn*d SrYi
staff.
A.
B.
c.
V.
*{,1':.*l g+aau poiu_ {-o +r c uluq't 2-D
,t--
^
,. , ow*y!o). +o
kur Abpcl- Ltncvoa,ct'rrvV ll
'";rd,e- cxP Wa'€lL Vt,c'votc^w,?t"\,? .\/)'
ll/
, r!..1!'r
I
FOUND PIN AND CAP PE-LS 2183
49.77
NQTE. MQNUMENTATION IN THIS AREA IS EXTREMELY POOR. THIS SURVEY IS EASED IN PART IN PART ON RICHARDS EN6INEERIN6 SURVEYS OF 1978.v8- 2t7 AND V8 - t25.
I hereby certlfy thal thls l4rovcmn! locaclon ccrllflcat,e rar pregared for thc
EorEg,ege lender and thc tltlc lnrurancb colpany' lhet 1r.ls not a land rurvey plat
or lryroveoenr survey'prii, ..a rhac lc tg nor- to be relted upon for thc cstabltth-
oenr of fence, buildr.ll-.I oit.i r,rtu." loprovecnr llncs. I furth.r c€rrlly Ehat
the loproveuenca on thl above dcacrlbed perccl on Ehlr d't'' GTCGPC uclllty coo-
necrlone, are enctrely ytthln che bormdarlcr of ghe pdrccl, crcsP! ll rhoun, 3hat
there ere ,,o "rr"ro""t-.ni" ,,gon the deacrlbed prcrlror -by l4rovcrncr on rny ad-
Jolnlng pre.lsea, "*..i.-1"-iiJr""i"a, rnd that therc It no rPPrr'nt cvldenco or
elgn of any eaaeunc croaalng or burdeolng any Prrt of catd percrl' Grc'PE rt not'd '
Thtr certtflcate do.3 not conaSlGuGr t tltlc tearch by tnter-lbuntalo En3lnecrto3
to detGrllne orrnerrUrp or i"..*nt" of record' Por ell loforretlon re3eidtn3
esseDcot6'rtghts-of-rayorcltl.ofrecord.lntcr-HountalnEnglnccrlngrelled
uPon tDe tlnot PLAT OF BTGHORN TERRACE, VATL,COLORADO'
l{OTlCE: Accordlng to Colorado lrr, Jtou rt3t comlce
rny leqal actlon based uPon my dcfect In thls sunqy
rlthtn-three year3 after you flrtt dlscovcr such &fect.
ln no event, n y any actlon bascd upon Such defact ln
thls survey be comenccd norc thrn tcn telrs fru tJtc
date of the certlflcatlon shoun hcraon.
s 136 " Js'
hEEr+ c,7
ADDlflrrNI \-.
lt(o
d,t U-
\_1to< I <,e(gq<U- I
56 93
30 42
BL L,G
, ...1 .. rn- ..i'-'l _.'j:.| r: i..r
---
57--
W4
\\
\\>tr)t\
a ro
=
N
\f
N
o
tr)
N
o
\t
N
t{
a\
\J
t+
rc)
o)
t.F
i,lji.'i l- ,'i'J
--...-
\r.-11 -,?la- I
Vwooo DEc'(l
I
lrt{ -^AJ,^'EM4NT
89il35 MPR;OVEM E NT LOCAT IO N C E RT I F I C AT E
!;l;'il'?ll*,^,*^o ltor""-Mountaln i:3i;3H;$:* 1]\E gineerlnglrd.
IJIYE tO!laao vaf{c2
Llxtrao@. co-o . 40216 (toll alc-o t !a
UNIT 20, BIGHORN TERRACE, TOWN OF
VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO 29 -DISK
57
o o
r- lg'
SatE rf, "- t'
SAoND FtPoP
TO UF+ Insurance Corpofon F
Commitment
for Title Insurance
tE[#u
Titl6 USA Insurance Corporation, Dallas, Texas, A Texas Corporation, herein called the Company, for valuable
consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policiss ot title insuranca, as identified in Schedule A. in
tavor ot the proposed lnsured named in Schedule A, as owner or mongagso of the estatg or intsrest covered
heteby in the land described or relened to in Schedule A. upon payme of the premiums and charges therefor;
all subiect to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof.
This Commitment shall b€ effective onv whsn the identity of the proposed Insured and the €mount of ths
policY o. polici€s committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either atthe time of
issuance of this Commitr|rcnt or by subsequent endorsement,
This Commitrnent is preliminary to the issuancs of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and
obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective dats hereof of when tne
policy or policies committed for shallissue, whicheverlirst occurs, provided that the failureto issuesuch policy
or policies is not the fault ofthe Company. The Commitment shsll not be valid or binding untilcountersigned by
an authorized officer or agent.
lN WfTNESSWHEREOF, TitleUSA Insurance Corporation has caused this Commitmentto be signed and sealed
as of the effective date of Commitment shown in Schedule A.
Titls USA Insurance Corooration
Prcsidaot & Chial Execttive Ollicat
7"r-rr-/P"-
Aftest: Sectrtafy
\e,ceruP+-
Q--po#-l-o
\&++P" JaruF\
aut'.,t.ot"n'
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION COMMITMENT TO TNSURE _ 197,]
Forb 106 cS 301,!687n
Prepared for:
Vacaflon ProPertles
r ATTN: John Dunham
286 Br ldge Street
Vall, C! 81657
CCrs to: i
' Vu"utiot.oPert ies
M & J Condomlnlums
SCHEDULE A ESCTOW
2. Policy or Policies to be issued:
(a) fl ALTA Owners PolicY -
Proposed Insured: JOHN F' NILSSON
(b) C ALTA Standard Loan PolicY,
Form--1970 $ 69'000'oo
Coverage-1970 $ 69'000'00
Customer Reference: Soph lr./Nl I sson
cF No. 301686'Cz
cF/kk
1. Eftecrivedate: September 7, 1988 at 7:00 A'M'
I nq u i riets+V It:" 6Jt3t"3
Amount
prooosed Insured: JAMES C. SOPHIR and MARTIN E' SOPHIR
' 3. The estate or interest in the land described orreferred to in this Commilment and covered herein is:
FEE
4. Title to said estate or interest in said land is at the elfective date hereof vested in:
JAMES C. SOPHIR and MARTIN E. S0PHIR
as tenants In comrPn
5. The land relerred to in this commitment is located in the County ol Eag I e
State ot Co lorado and described as follolvs:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION SET FORTH ON SHEET ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS
NETENEHCE INCORPOMTED HEREIN AIO MADE A PART HEREOF.
0wnerts Premlum: $ 547.60
Lenderfs Premlum: $ 40.00
Addr I Charges: $
'Tax Certif lcate: $ 5.00
T0IAL CHARGES: $ 396.60
A EFTCAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATIOI{ COPYRIGHT 1971 (REV.)
SCHEOUI.E A
FORM 106 GS 40M6A7H
. Coverlng fhe Land In
Descrlbed as:
SCHEOULE A - conflnued 0rder No. 301686'C2
Plat l.D. No. B-16
the State of Colorado, County of Eagle
Unit 20,
BIGHORN TERMCE
o SCHEDULE B-t o
No. 501686 -C2
l. The following are the requirements to be complit'd with:
1. lnstruments necessary to create the eslate or interest to be insured must be properly executecl,
delivered and duly liled for record.
2. Payment of the consideration for the eslate or interest to be insured.
3. payment of all taxes, charges, assessments. levied and assessed against subiect premises, which
are due and payable.
4. SatisJactory evidence should be had that improvements and/or repairs or alterations thereto are
completedi that contractor, subcontractors, labor and materialmen arc all paid-
5. Deed from James C. Sophlr and lt'tartln E. Sophlr, as tenants In comnpn
to John F. Nllsson.
:
6. Deed of Trust from John F. Nllsson to the Publlc Trustee of Eagle
County for the use of James C. Sophlr and Martln E. Sophlr, as
fenants tn comron, to secure $69'000.00.
7. Evldence satlsfaciory to the Company'or lts-duly authorlzed agenf
that the nreal estate transfer taxrr lmposed by Ordlnance No. 26,
Serles of 1979, of the Town of Vall, Colorado has been pald, and that
the llen lrposed by Sectlon 1l thereof has been fully satlsfled.
sc+tEouLE s-l
ri.Earai,\t I ta,n 'rtr = lqenarlTtn{ ^^Dvo!/:r.r'!' rnt. 'ttEtt \ FcP!'l 'rl5 GS r,rl.'!66;H
SCHEDULE B-tI
^
-der
No. ,u lodo-uz
-ll. Schedule B ot the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the lollowing matters unless the same are
disoosed ol to the satisfaction of the Company:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession nol shown by the public records.
2. Easements or claims ot easements, not shown by the public records'
3. Discrepancies, conflicls in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a conect
survey and inspection ot the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material therelofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law
and not shown by lhe public records.
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public
records or attaching subsequent to the efleclive date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured
acouires ol record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment.
Exceotions numbered are hereby omitled.
6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, speclal assessments' Charge or llen.
lmposed for waier or sewer servlce, or for any other sPeclal taxlng dlstrlct-
7. Rlght of way for dltches or canals cons+rucfed by the author{fy ot "'".' '"' 'r:
the Unlted States, as reserved tn Unlted States Pafent recorded
November 22, 1939, ln Book 123 a't Page 625.
easement as shown on the plaf of said subdlvlslon, said
belng 20.00 feet ln rldfh along the southerwesterly lo+
shown on the plat of sald subdivislon.
6.
1
8.
Park i ng
easenent
llne.
Notes as
Any and al I rlghts of the owner of the property adJolnlng on the
easterly arlslng from the erectlon of exls+ence of a party ral I
located on subject property as shown on the Plat of sald
subdivlslon.
Restr lcfions, whlch do not contain a forfelture or reverter clause,
but omltttng restrlctlons, lf any, based on race, color, rellglon
or natlonal orlgln, as contained In lnsfrument recorded December
20, 1962, in Book 174 at Page 405, as amended by instrument
9.
{n
ll.
12.
recorded May 7, 1965, ln Book 175 at Page 81.
Ten percenf non-partlcipatlng royaltles in and to
from any minerals of whatsoever kind and nature,
from sald premises, as reserved to Gust Klahtipes
Kiahtipes by lnsfrumenf recorded November 2' 1962
Page 407, and any and all asslgnments thereof or
there I n.
proceeds der lved
produced and mined
and Eva J'. :.-:.:,
In Book :1 66''at-,.':
i nterests
Deed of Trust from James C. Sophlr and Martin E. Sophlr to the
Public Trustee of Eagle Coun+y for the use of Richard I{. Newman, fo
secure $67,000.00, di+ed May 1, 1983, and recorded May 15, 1985, ln
Book 359 at Page 539.
Any and al I unredeemed fax sales.
SCHEDULE A.ll
FORM 106 GS 20M 2A:lH
G0LOnA00l
(Continued)
AMEFICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCTATION COPYRIGHT 1971 (REV.}
('
THA}K YOU FOR YOUR CRDERI
lf you hwe any lrqulrles' Please dlreqt theo to:
ASPEN TITLE CORPORATIOil
600 E. Hopklns Avenre fl 02
Aspen, Col orado 81 611
Local - 92e-4050
Dervec Dl re-t - 595'8463
x E cLE counfi TrrLE oRPoRATtoN
955 S. Frontage Road #100
Vall, Colorado 81657
Local - 476-6423
Denver Direc-t - 572'1490
s1jf,r{tT @UHTY ,qES]RACT @tfAffY THE TITLE Cot,P }lY, ING
lOe N. Rldge Street 525 Zecex
Breckenridge, Colorado 80424 Fraser, Colorado 80442
Local - 4534120 Local - 726'8077
Denver Dlresf - 629-6096 Denver Dlrst - 892-1905
'Commltment No.501686'Cz
EXCEPTIONS - contlnued
NoTE:Uponrece|ptofaCertjflcateofTaxesDueevldenclngthatthereare
no exlstir; ;;;;'i*-rui"i, the above exceptlon rlll not appear on the
Pollcles to be lssued hereunder'
Or,rorro* FoR ADDrTroro, ,*ro Q
FOR PROPERTIES IN EXCESS OF ALLOWABLE GRFA
Date of Appl
Date of DRB Meeti
PRE-APPL ICATION CONFERENCE
A pre-application conference wjth a member of the planning staff is strongly
encouraged to discuss the provisions under which additiona'l GRFA can be added to a site. It should be understood that thjs ordinance does not assure each property
an additional 250 square feet of GRFA. Rather, the ordinance allows for gp to
250 square feet if certain conditions are met.
Applications for additions under this section will not be accepted unless they are complete. This includes all information required on this form as well as
Design Review Board submittal requirements.
PROJ ECT
< ;"-
DESCRI PTION:
ication.
B.LOCAT ION
Address
OF PROPOSAL:
Descri pt ion:
District
r'1. t'
Legai
Zone
C. NAME
Lot Block Fi 1 ing
OF APPLICANT:
Address hone 1/ /6 (/tS (/
D. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE:
Add.ess phonq t1'/1 t1[ tt1
E.NAI'fE 0F 0WNER(S) ;' .,i,;
Address _. '.,-r a , phone_:/:tJ/A):/_
submittal requirements, shall be
a final certifjcate of occupancy.
property owners and of owners of is avai'l able from the Eagle County
F. Filing Fee of $100.00 is required at tine of submittal
The following information, in addition to DRB
required with this submittal:
i. Verification that the unit has received
2. Names and mailing addresses of adjacent
un'its on the same lot. This information
Assessor's office.
3. Condorninium association approval (if applicable).
4. Existing f1 oor plan of structure.
'
,>1r 7r'7i r-
u.Your proposal will be reviewed for compliance with Vai l's Comprehensive Plan.
I I 9. A request foE an amendment to
Bank, Part of Lot D, Block 2,S. Frontage Road West.
o No. 2i, VaiI National village 2nd Filing, 108
SDD Vail
.\ / ,' 10.#
Applicant: Vail National Bank Building Corp.
A request for a side yard eetback variance at 4247 Columbine
Drive, unit #20, Bighorn Terrace.
Applicant: John Nilsson
11. A request for a front setback variance and a creek setback
variance for Lot 6, Vail Village west, Filing No. 2 ' L755
West Gore Creek Drive.
Applicant: Dan and Karen Forey
A request for a conditional use pernit and a height variance
in order to construct an antenna at the Vail Municipal
building, 75 South Frontage Road.
Applicant: Toltn of VaiI Police Departrnent
A request for a major subdivision, a reguest to approve the
prelininary p1an, a reguest for a variance to the maximurn
height for retaining walls, and a reguest for a variance to
the naximum percent grade for a road, on a parcel cornmonly
referred to as Spraddle Creek, an approximate 40 acre parcel
located north and east of the ltain Vail I-70 interchange and
east of the Spraddle Creek liverY.
Applicant: George Gillett, Jr.
A request for a work session on the Sonnenalp remodel and
proposed Special Development District at 20 vail Road, Part
of f,ot L, Block 5-8, Vail Village Lst Filing.
AppJ.icant: sonnenalp Properties, Inc.
L2.
13.
14.
The applications and
available for public
Department office.
Town of VaiI
Conmunity Development
Published in the Vail
information about the proposals are
inspection in the Community Development
Department
Trail on June 8, 1.990.
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environnental
Conrnission of the Town of vail will hold a public hearing in
accordance with Section L8.66.060 of the nunicipal code of the
Town of Vail on June 25, 1990 at 2:00 P.m. in the Town of Vail
Municipal Building. Consideration of:
A request for an exterior alteration and a landscape
variance in order to construct an addition to the BelI Tower
Building at 201- core Creek Drive, Part of Tract A, Block 58
VaiI Village lst Filing.Applicant: Hermann Staufer - Lancelot Restaurant
A request for a conditional use pernit to
allow for a Bed and Breakfast at Lots 6 and L/2 of 5, Block
5, Vail Village seventh Filing, L119 E. Ptarmigan Road.
Applicant: Monie S. BeaI
A request for a conditional use perrnit to
allow for a Bed and Breakfast at Lot 8, Block 3' Bighorn
Subdivision, sth Addition, 5198 Gore Circle.
Applicant: John and Paula Canning
A request for a conditional use perrnit for a construction
staging area, located just uphill of the Golden Peak
snowuaking pumphouse, Tract B, Vail Village 7th Filing.Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc.
5. Prelininary review for an exterior alteration in conmercial
core I, for the following property (60 to 90 day study
period) :
covered Bridge Building - I,ot C and Lot D, and the
southwesterly 4 feet of Lot B, all in Block 5-B, VaiI
village ].st Filing, 227 Br|dge street.
Applicant: Hillis of Snowmass, Inc.
A request for a variance from the waII height requirement on
r-ctL 29, Block L, Vail Potato Patch; 805 Potato Patch Drive.
Applicant: Patsy and Pedro Cerisola
A request for an amendrnent to the Townrs zoning code to add rrTelevision Stationrr as a conditional use in the Commercial
core II zone district, Section 18.26.01o
Applicant: Vail/Beaver Creek Television Network.
A request for a conditional use perrnit for a deck expansion
at the Shteet Basil restaurant, located on Tract A, Block 58,
Vail Village 1st Filing, 193 East Gore creek Drive.
Applicant: Kevin Claire/Chuck Rosenquist
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
/\tu& r/o cr-x7 c"''-/''Lr' i {-'a{
6/,s1q,,
8.
q
RES(II,'Ii('E I'E\TIRS I\
lli'l'l'H( )t'(ll-lT.rf ,\liL,\::
( hlragt,
Iletfcit
\linueapr-'ii.-
5/3o/8e
REAL ESTATE
NILSSON RESIDENCE ADDITION
4247 Collrrnbine Drive - WesL 1,/2
Vail, Coforado
RU.\r IST.-\TE O!'F]C],S I)"
\.\( .tf lo\ .\RUAS r )t'
{- r'llildr,
Floncia
I'lichigrrr
llintttsoi;i
\1-tici'r.ir
".- qa
4*r"
Ll
\i{CATION PROPERTIES \El\\ORK
t)0t! E Beavel f rr,:l: Blid . Dra\\'er 91, .Ar.on. CfJ ili:i2tl .,jt]Jtv{9-.li6ir
tr 2ti(i Bridct Stnret .\iiil. ('0 81657 . jiljr,1itj.li5.i
JOHN F, NILSSON
P.O. BOX 1056 476.4854
vArL, COLORADO 816s8
VAIL NATIONAL 8A}IK
P.O. 80X 2638
vArL, coLoBADO 81658
82-3fl/1021
2 437
5/L/eO
OF VAI
00400t(******
******10. 00
*************************
r:loaLolLIqr:toe
Jr
*r**rTHI5 APPLiCATION rdlILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL
be resol ved befo.re a bui I di ng penn'i t i s i ssued '
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Dtr.trdc.. €trx
APPLICATION DATE:lnN I fl?o
DATE OF DRB XEETII'
INFORI,IATION IS SUBIIITTED**T**
AoDiT?oN uJeS t/z
I. PRE-APPLICATION MEEIING: :.' , . :"
A pre-applicati.on meeting with-a planning staff member'is strongly suggested to
. determ.rn" ,, uny"uJaii:ouai infoniation-is-nieoee.. Na application-uiil be.a:ceftel
:
uniess it'is compi'"t. (t"tt include iii ii.tt required bv the zoning aoministrator)'
It is the appiicant's responsibilit'-io otii.-un-dppoinUnlnt with the staff to find
out about aaAitional submittal ".quit.*.nii. Please-note that a COMPLETE appl'ica- i
tion will streamjine the approval process for your project by decreasing the number
of conditions of'afp"ouif tirat ttre'OnS-tiV itiiutate. ALL conditions of approval must
.:;i i: *
..a:t3
.--:.- i:
B. LOCATION
Address
OF PROPOSAL:
4aq C
Descri pt'ion Lot
LalnB^E DRTUE
Bl ock
40
Fii ing Legal
Zon'i ng
C. NAI4E OF APPLICANT:Jarrd Nrts':cr./NtD rl tc+o,r)
Address
D.NAI'IE OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE:S+rne
Addres s
E. NAI'IE OF
5 i gna tur
Address
c noa trtrtr.a.
*rne-.
The fee wil'l be Paid at the time a building Permit
VALUATION
tel ephone.476-4Bs'/ -"
tel ephone
tttrectt)
tel ephone
is requested.
Itrr,
$ o-$ 1o,ooo
$10,001 -$ 50'000
$:.50,001 - $ 150,000
$150,001 - $ .500,000
s500,001 - $1,000'000 $ Over $1,000'000
$ 10.00
$ 25.00
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$300 .00
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUEMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
1. In addition to rneeting submittal requiremdnts, the-applicant must stake the s'ite
to ind'icate p"op""iy"iin"t unJ-Uri'l ding corners' Trees- that will be removed
should also be marked. This work rrit-u" completed before the DRB visits the
. si te.
2. The review process for NEH BUILDINGS wil'l normally involve twO Separate meet'lngs
oi-tf,e Design n"ui""-irourl,-io ptan on at least two meetings for their.approval'
to appear before the Oes'i gn Review Board at their scheduled
i;";-;;l'uii"a ro" a postponement will be requ'ired to be 3. Peopie who fail
meeting and who
reoubl i shed.
?e
-F ::. :.l,it
Thefollowingitemsnolongerhave.tobe,presentedto.the.DesignReviewBoard'
They, however' nave t; 6;'i;;=;ni.a to tnl ionins Administrator for approvai:
skylights and simi'l ar exterior changes that do not alter the
plane of the building; and
..,,...".i{i
4.
a. l,li ndows 'exi sti ng
b. Building additions that are not viewed
wnich hive had letters submitted from
the addition; andlor approval from the
assoc'iati on .
5. You may be required to conduct Naturai Hazard Studies
ctrecf< wittr a Town Planner before proceeding'
from any other lot or Public sPace,
adjoining Property owners approvlng
igent for', or manager of a condominium
on your ProPerty. You shouid