HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL INTERMOUNTAIN BLOCK 5 LOT 2 LEGAL FILE.pdft /rthrn"rnfzr-^
loflr blE5-
cdilrrt\, tElELoAErfr
Design Review Boad
ACTIOI{ FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Ftontage Road. Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 faxi970.479,2452
web: www.vailgov.com
Project Name: FLUSSHEIM TH REROOF/PAINT
ProJect Descrlptlon:
Particlpants:
Prciect Addrese: 3008 S FRONTAGE RD WEST VAIL
FLUSSHEIM TOWNHOMES
FINAL APPROVAL FOR A COMMON ELEMENT-FLUSSHEIM TOWNHOMES RE.ROOF AND REPAINT
OF TRIM
DRB Number: DR8060389
Location:
owNER MARR, CHART.-ES A. & SAMH A. 08/28/200b
924 9fi ST 7
SAT'ITA MONICA
cA 90403
APPUCANT SETH MINKOFF 08/28/2006 Phone: 390-0986
Legal Descrlptlon: Lot: l Block:5 Subdivisionl VAILINTERMOUNTAIN DEV S
Parcel Number: 2103-154-0800-1
Comments: SEE CONDmONS
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
CondlUonsr
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Action: STAFFAPR
Date of APProval: 08/28/2006
Cond:8
(PLAN)l No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
C-ond:0
(P|-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced
and ls dlllgenuy pursuecl toward completlon,
Joe Suther DRB Fee Paid: $250'00 Planner:
O"t inor Exterior AlteratiQ
General Information:
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application' Please
refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The
project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
besign review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within
one year of the approval.
Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2128 fax: 970.479,2452
web: www.\railgov'com
il Description of the Request:
Type of Review and Fee:
tr Signs
tr Conceptual Review
tr New Construction tr Addition
Minor Alteration
(multi-fu mily/commercial)
Minor Alteration
(single-family/duplex)
Changes to Approved Plans
Separation Request
ta^"-.(,'-t-a c'l (lo-*,-r d"--"-t..'r Rn".ccl -
0 k-fF - Vrt v
tr
tr
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area'
No Fee
$650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild-
$3Q0 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
- \commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
( SZSO |or minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
\r.------lre-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the
Design Review Board.
No Fee
- /' J
: v'J- \<-(
i1i'u \i uL" - r-t- r'"
Locationof theProposalt Lot: { Btocr, 5 5r66;qr;on' U6-( 'ln:Lr..r
" ' H
\-/physicat Address: Jftco lc"-e^^ -\ .-( ' "i- "-' - -f.f, ,,Pnysrcnl Address:
parcetNo.: 2 rc i / f Y"'i, ltiffiusruco.Assessor":tl9it;tJt:^-.Jir=rfl:",y.r ''"'-a
r vl\ \|\vr^\l ,
sfi)zoning: = .
Name(s)of owner(s): ])'cA':!l '., ( t --'"' :' [(t'''i ' I"'-.'r' L -\ 6'r"!\D^^
Mailing Address:
Owner(s) Signature(s):
E-mail Address:
I
-t-
It++t*****++**r*+++*++++t+*****+++t+++*t+++*+++**t+***a*****+++t+*+l+***********+*****'l****+
TOWNOFVAIL. COLORADO Statement +**l+*****************'t********+*******t++*******f*tlt**'i*************++*********+a*********
Statement Nuniber: R050001304 Amount: $250.00 08/28/20o6to:50 AIvl
Payment Method: Check
ASSOC.
Init: iIS
Notation: 1026lFL,USSHETM TH
Permit No3
Parcel No:
Site Addres6 :
L,ocation:
Thia Payment !
DRBOS 03I9 Type: DRB-Minor AIt, Comn/Multi
2103-154-0800-1
3OO8 S FRONTAGE RD WEST
FIJUSSHEIM TOWNIIOMES
s250.00
Deacription
VAIL
Total Feee:
Total- ALL Pmts :
Balance 3
s250.00
$2s0.00
$o. oo
Current Pmts
250.00
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code
DR 0010 00031122 0 0 DESIGN REVIEW FEES
i-,*,... / Y1f'.r.tf,i --
Buildino Materials
PROPOSED MATERIAIS
Type of Material Color
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashing
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walls
5". ,4gp. Gr CJor SG
f\^1\-t
,)'\c,-\ch Z {,)+,8
Notes!
Please specify the manufacturer's name, the color name and number and attach a color chip.
F: \cdev\FORMS\PERI'lm\Planning\drb_minor_alt_l 1-23-2005.doc
r112312005
Page 6 of 13
. Lo@tion of all required parking spaces . Snow storage areas,. Proposed dumpster location and detail of dumpster enclosure.. Retaining walls with proposed elevations at top and bottom of walls. A detailed cross-section and
elevation drawings shall be provided on the plan or separate sheet. Stamped engineering
drawings are required for walls between 4' and 6'feet in height,. Delineate areas to be phased and appropriate timing, if applicable
. Landscape Plan:. Scale of 1" = 20'or larger . Landscape plan must be drawn at the same scale as the site plan.
. Location of existing trees, 4" diameter or larger. Indicate trees to remain, to be relocated
(including new location), and to be removed. Large stands of trees may be shown (as bubble) if
the strand is not being affected by the proposed improvements and grading.
. Indicate all existing ground cover and shrubs.. Detailed legend, listing the type and size (caliper for deciduous trees, height for conifers, gallon
size for shrubs and height for foundation shrubs) of all the existing and proposed plant material
including ground cover.. Delineate oitical root zones for existing trees in close proximity to site grading and construction.
. Indicate the location of all proposed plantings.
. The location and type of existing and proposed watering systems to be employed in caring for
plant material following its installation.. Existing and proposed contour lines. Retaining walls shall be included with the top of wall and
the bottom of wall elevations noted.
. Lighting Plan:. Indicate type, location and number of fixtures.. lnclude height above grade, lumens output luminous area . Attach a cut sheet for each proposed fixture.
. REPAINT PROPOSALS
. For all proposals to repaint existing buildings, the following supplemental information is required:
. Color chip or color sample including the manufacturer name and color number(s). Architectural elevation drawings which clearly indicate the location of proposed colors (ie. siding,
stucco, window trim, doors, fascia, soffiits, .etc.
)
F:\cdev\FoRMs\PERMlTs\Planning\drb-minor-alt-11-23-2005.d0c Page 5 of 13
Lu23l200s
o
Design Review Boa
ACTION FORM
rd
CCtrnUM l-l EVEL@I'€ tT
iat Z P{k-f
Val l^l<'nA^,
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 97O.479.2452
web: www.vailgov,com
Project Name:
Proiect Description:
ProjectAddress: 3008 S FRONTAGE RD WESTVAIL
FLUSSENHEIM TOWN HOMES
DRB Number: DR8050456
FINAL APPROVAL FOR A RE-ROOF FROM CEDAR SHAKE TO METAL SHINGLE
Participants:
owNER MARR, CHARLES A. & SAMH A.0812612005
924 9TH ST 7
SANTA MONICA
cA 90403
APPLICANT FLUSSENHEIM TOWNHOMES/BRENDA08/26|2005 Phone: 390-5633
3OO2 S. FRONTAGE RD. W.
VAIL
co 81657
Location:
Legal Description: Lot: l Block:5 Subdlvision: VAILINTERMOUNTAIN DEV S
Parcel Number: 2103-154-0800-1
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACIION
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
Conditions:
Dorward
Hanlon
5-0
Action: DENIED
Date of Approval:
Cond: 8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the wri$en consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PI-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced
and is diligently pursued toward completion.
Planner: Elisabeth Eckel DRB Fee Paid: f2SO.OO
Flussenheim Townhomes
DRB05-0456
october 12.2005
Thc Design Review Board moves to deny design review application DRB05-0456 as the
request f'ails to comply with the pulpose and intent of the Design Guidelines established
in Section l2-ll-5 of the vail rown code. Specifically, the Board finds the following:
"While it is understood that the intent of the guidelines is to leave as much design
Ji'eedom as possible to the individual designer while maintaining the remarkable natural
beauty of the area by creating structures which are designed to complement both their
individual sites and surroundings, the Boardfinds that the request to install the proposed
stamped metal roofing material/siding on the Flussenheim Townhomes as an alternative
to the existing wood cedar shakes fails to;
l) further thefive design objectives of the Design Guidelines as stated in Section
l2-11-1, Intent, ofthe Vail Town Code,
2) comply with the Section 10, Design Review Standards and Guidelines, Title
14, Town of Vail Development Standards Handbook, as it relates to
approvable building materials, or
3) meet the three specifc criteria adoptedfor the use of any roojing material,
including those not spectfcally identified in the Development Standards
Handbook as the stamped metal roofing material/siding is neither satisfactory
in general appearance, architectural style or texture, nor is it compatible with
the structure (mansard roof design), site (proximity to the public street and
bike path), or the overall character oJ'the Town ofVail.
The Board alsoJinds that other more suitable and approvable building materials exist
such as cementious boards, siding and shingles, or other equally durable and long-
las ting synthetic products..
Lastly, the Boardfinds that the Design Guidelines, as adopted in Section 12-l I-5 of the
Vail Town Code should befairly and consistently applied throughout the Town of Vail. In
doing so, the Board does not believe that the proposed stamped metal roofing/siding
material, which has been designed to simulate wood-grain would be approvable in other
locations of the Town. For example, East Vail, Glen Lyon, Potato Patch, Buffehr Creek,
West Vail, etc."
O uinor Exterior Alteratlrs
Application for Design Review
Depatment of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2L28 faxi 970.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.com
General Information:
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior (o submifting a building permit application. Please
refer to the submittal requirements for the pafticular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The
project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences withan
one year of the approval.
Description of the Request:
Location of the Proposal: t-ot: 1 e wx: { Subdivision:
tJ*t 4"4- bl
Physical Address:
Parcef No.: Jlo 3t5406Oo I (Contact Eagle C.o. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
Name(s) of Owner(s):
Mailing Address:
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Applicant:
Mailing Address:
v
vt
6)
v1 ,c
,{q fr
- lars,torr"x: 1?0. X+E
-V
Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign
Type of Review and Feer
tr Signs
D Conceptual Review
tr New Construction D Addition
Q/ tutinor Alteration
(multi-family/commercial)
tr Minor Alteration
(single-family/duplex)
D Changes to Approved Plans
tr Separation Request
$s0
No Fee
$6s0
$300
@
$20
$20
No Fee
For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.
For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the
Design Review Board.
Fororrice53?Srv:
cnecrno.: l( L? ,r,?*'k h-F:,,7-zrof
Buildino Materials
PROPOSED MATERHLS
Tvpe of Materlal
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashing
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walls
Exterior Lighting
Other
Notes!
Please speci$ the manufacture/s name, the color name and number and attach a color chip.
Color
Page 6 of L3l06lo6l05
. Proposed surface drainage on and off-site.. Location of landscaped areas.. Location of limits of disturbance fencing o Location of all required parking spaces . Snow storage areas.o Proposed dumpster location and detail of dumpster enclosure.. Retaining walls with proposed elevations at top and bottom of walls. A detailed cross-section and
elevation drawings shall be provided on the plan or separate sheet. Stamped engineering
drawings are required for walls between 4'and 6'feet in height.o Delineate areas to be phased and appropriate timing, if applicable
. Landscape Plan:. Scale of 1" = 20' or larger r Landscape plan must be drawn at the same scale as the site plan.o Location of existing trees, 4" diameter or larger, Indicate trees to remain, to be relocated
(including new location), and to be removed. Large stands of trees may be shown (as bubble) if
the strand is not being affected by the proposed improvements and grading.r Indicate all existing ground cover and shrubs.. Detailed legend, listing the type and size (caliper for deciduous trees, height for conifers, gallon
size for shrubs and height for foundation shrubs) of all the existing and proposed plant material
including ground cover.. Delineate critical root zones for existing trees in close proximity to site grading and construction.. Indicate the location of all proposed plantings,o The location and type of existing and proposed watering systems to be employed in caring for
plant material following its installation.. Existing and proposed contour lines. Retaining walls shall be included with the top of wall and
the bottom of wall elevations noted.
. Lighting Plan:. Indicate type, location and number of fixtures,. Include height above grade, lumens output, luminous area . Attach a cut sheet for each proposed fixture.
. REPAINTPROPOSALS
o For all proposals to repaint existing buildings, the following supplemental information is required:
. Color chip or color sample including the manufacturer name and color number(s). Architectural elevation drawings which clearly indicate the location of proposed colors (ie. siding,
stucco, window trim, doors, fascia, soffiits, etc,)
Page 5 of 13/06/06/05
******a+*****{'*****+tt+++**l*****a+**+***+***+***t+*+f+*t++++************************+t*+***
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statement
l'+ ******+++++***+*+*****+******+****** ******+++++t i ***** * *** *!t** ****r.**** * +*++*****+**++ *++*
Statement Nurnber: R050001407 Atnount: $250.00 Og / 26 /2OO5O4: l-6 pM
Payment Method: Check
FIRM/BREIIDA PARKS
hit 3 ,JS
Notation: 1129/PARKS IrAIY
Permit No:
Parcel No:
Sit.e Addrege :
Location:
This Payment:
DR8050456 Type: DRB-Minor AIt, Comm/Multi
2103-1s4-0800-1
3OO8 S FRONTAGE RD WEST VAIL
FLUSSEI{HEIM TOY{N HOMES
Total Fees 3
$zso. oo Total AL,L Pnts :
Balance :
$2s0.00
$2s0.00
s0.00 **** **** * ** *****'* **** +++**l **+++ +***+** **** *** *+* * + **+ +**+* * +*t* * ** ********* * * *** +++* * * *****
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code DescriDtion Current Pmts
DR 00100003LL2200 DESIGN REVIEW FEES 250.00
lrarqttti
\y
N \
s
s
$
*
t\\
\
N
N \\-
e$
I
N
$
^\s \
N t'\
^\..\)
"\(/
$
\:
N
..\
)
Lr",
|.\
\,\-T-
-:.*
N
.\
\
t]'t;\
!-.
s \\\\
N
e
s
\
&
\\
"\
$
N,*6'de o*'ba[drny J
N \l
t
*N
N
\
R
t
a \
l\{-.
$\.
+n
I
w (.
\
\
N
l4
K'\
N-\-
i{
N\\
N
\
\
TF)t-N
rl
A_r
\,.r
R
f\
\
I
N)N'v {
N
\
t!
ilrlunfluuilrH
ASTOIIWOOD
sTEril. Sf,ttGtE
PRODUCT DATA
Manufactured in Joolin. MO
METALWORKS"ASTONWOOD- Steel Shingles combine the
warmth and appeal of cedar shingles with the strength and durability
of galvanized steel to produce a roofing product which replicates the
rich deeo hand-hewn texture of wood. Available in a wide anav of
beautiful colors.
For application to roof decks with inclines not less than 3 inches per foot and up to
mansard or sidewall application. For slopes between 3 and 4 inches per foot, TW Metal & Tile Under-
layment must be used over enlire deck area.
. Backed by a 50 Year Limited Product Warranty, 25 Year Full Start Period, Limited Transferability, a 30
Year Finish Limited Warranty, and a 50 Year Limited Wnd Warranty against damage from winds up
to 110 mph. See Limited Warranty for details.. Galva-Strength G-90 steel construction.. Special coating process resists dirt and environmental aging. Fluoropolymer coating system from
The ValspaP Corporation with Kyna|4 500/Hylar 5000@coating.. Lightweight compared to traditional roofing products.. Resists fading and chalking.. Fire resistant for added orotection.". Can be applied over existing asphalt shingles eliminating disposal cost and mess."'. Four-way locking system for enhanced performance.
Astonwood Colors:
. Forest Green
. Timber Brown
. River Rock Brown
. Vermont Blue
. Sequoia Red
. Brite Red
. Sierra Slate Grev
Tested in comoliance with:
UL 790
ASTM D 3161, Class F (110 MPH)
uL2218
Shingle Size
Exposure
Coverage per Box
Pri.rl.3 .!r b<.rl.n
v
Listed bv UL for:
Class A Fire Rating'-
Wnd Resistance
lmpacl Resistance, Class 4
ICC-ES Legacy Report No. 5484
ICC-ES Legacy Report No. 586
Accepted for Use, City of New York, Department of Buildings MEA 156-00-M Vol ll
ccMc 13011-R
'12-518" x 39-3/4"
12"
98.4 sq ft
(app.ox. I sq)
Shingles per Box 30
Shingles per Square 30
Weight per Shingle 2 lbs
Weight per Square 61 lbs
_ t$a6.(dr9.
. !9!/a'
Shingle material: Nominal 0.0135" thickness, including G-90 galvanization and paint coalings. Exterior
finish is fluoropolymer (PVDF) with anti-corrosive primer, 'l mil dry film thickness.
Interior finish is a wash coat with anti-corrosive primer, 0.6 mil dry film thickness.
Clip: 1-114" wide x 2-118" long x 1/5" deep
clip Material: 0.015" thick, G-90 galvanized steel
Refer to Accessory Producl Data Sheet for more information.
For inbmatoo r€ladim or ! copy oI TAMKO s liftttod wanailly, contact your lo€l TAJ,Xo leFe3€nhfio, vl3lt ua onlno al wrNw tafi*o com. o. call us at 8ms41 ,t691
'All valu6s slated as nominal
"Contact TAM KO or undorwnterc Laboraton€s for sp€cillc applic€tjon requiremenl! tor U L Class A €ted 6y6lem6
"'Checl yolr Local Euilding Code Euildino Cod€ r6slnclons may apply.
Visit our Web Site at wwwtamko.com or wwwmetalworksroof .com 1t2ot2n5 ilETArru0nKS
srEBL SHTNGLBS mmJ'
c.t.d homib ot I4Km
R@i4Fld6|ncF!,o'..orEh
rh'$i9rco'F[bn,|rxr.!
R@i{Ad6|E
JP53131
Cenkal Diskict
Norlheast District
Southeasl District
Southwesl District
Western District
220 West 4th St., Joplin, MO
4500 Tamko Dr.. Frederick. MD
2300 35lh Sl., Tuscaloosa, AL
7910 S. Central Exp., Dallas, TX
5300 East 43rd Av€.. D6nver. CO
64801 800-64 t-4691
21701 800-368-2055
35401 800-228-2656
75216 800-443-1834
80216 800-530-8868
lill] iltilililil
997801
r-
--
-lrI::l l:-,: l l
lrf.llii:fl:l:l: ll g0BZ.i ll ' l:ll.i
I I I
rl
I
" t*ngs and rechnologt
Prrnrnfehlllca 2ooo
Metullic Copper (non<ging| is
comorised of o I to 9 rnil metolllc
lluoiocorbon full slrenolh 70%
Kynor 500 finish cooh-ng over o
urethone orimer o[ .2 to .3 mil on
rhe finish side. wifi orimer ond
woshcooi on the reverse.
Preweolherad Gqlvolume coolino
is comorised of o .8 to -9 mil lull
strength, 70% Kynor 500 fluoro
corbon lPolyvinylidene [luoride
PVDfI cooting over o urehone
orimer ol .2 to .3 mil on the fini:h
iide, with primer ond o woshcoot
on lhe teverse.
Kynor 500, is a ngklued hodsno of Atofino Cltsnicok. ln6.
Hfu 5@6 it o rcgidtercd todeno* ol Auginonr USA, ldc.
GaVolvn{ nd Goluolune Pluf ore rcgiswed nodenork of BIEC lnwnolionol, lnc.
ULfRA<ool" E c hod.'..c* of IASF.
Disriburd by:
Englert is ono ol lhe few :ingle
source melol rool monuhclurers
wi on in-house coil coolino lrne
cnd on erceptionolly brood ionge
of finishes to meet ony design
obieclive. Whether vour desiqn
cofis [o, o noturol wlothered-
opoeoronce or briqht hiqh-
p"r'for'.on.", fu ll-siiengfi fl uor*
corbon color-Englen offers on
orrov of stcndord finishes.
Gurtorr Gclorr
Englert offers o wide ronge.of
cusl,om coiors with short leqd limet,
ond low m jnimum order reqvip
ments depending on the type of
suhsfrote. Englert con motch the
color of virtuolly ony moleriol,
includ;ng brick, wood ond fobric.
PernnGolcr 85OO
Enolen's Permdolor 3500
sto-ndord 3iyeor low qlosg color
cootings ore compriseJ of o .Z
b .9 mil full shong$ Z0% Kynor
500,/Hylor 5000 fl uorocorbon
(Polyvinylideno fl uoride PVDF)
coolino over o urelhdne Drimer
of .z ri s mil on the {rniih side.
wilh orimer ond o woshcool on
lhe reverse side on sbel, or with
iusl o woshcoot on oluminum.' ULTM.Cool'u ls stotaof{heort
when it comes to energy'efficient
met'ol roofing. Using MSF's
ULTRA-Cool coolings, UITRA-Cool
meets Energy Stof specs for
Cool Roofs ond nol only soves
energy bul monoy os well
bccdu3c:
r Heoi is raflecled owoy kom
the buildino
r Smog is re-duced when environ-
menlol bmp€rolures ore reduced . Energy cosh ore soved becouse
ol cooler inlerior sooces . Li{6 €xpsctoncy of the roof is
increqsed due to less exponsion
ond conlrodton
. Mondory incentives ore incroog
ingly,b;ng ofured for switching
lo relleclive rmlinc oroducls , YI . EmrsttYtly volues ol lne coonngs
exc6€d 80%
8A/LA 39Vd
Golvoluro-Plut'
Enolerl now offers c oremium sloel
orodu.t known os Gqlvolr.,m+Pl,Js.
This producl hos he odvonlcga
of on ocrylic coding to reduce
mill finish discolorotion ond
uneven weothering. This melol
is ovoiloble os o new hi.iech
solution lo sbndord uncoobd sbel.
51 10 Cousewr:y Boulevord
Tampo, tt 33619
Phoner l813) 2r'€.2296 fox: l8 )31 2{7.3290
UI!si!-
10225 Sodh Bode Slrcel
llointicld, lt 605.1d
Phoncr {6301 901-4610
Fox: {6301 90/{6ll
Pcno€clc cnd Drrrefiltclllcr Durcblllty lerrt
8OO-ENOLERT
htt pr / / r.,vww.cnglcrtinc.ccnr
@2003 6ngb/t Inc. All rightr rererved.
903008
44 Gqrden Stre€t
Donverr, L{A 01923
llrone: 1978J 774O006
f ot: lS78l 77 Le2,
Ncw leacv
1200 Amboy Aveorre
P.rrh Ambo, N, 09862
Phone {7321 376.11 l0 fox: 1732| 376-1115
New Yo'{
45 Dixon Avenue
Alrlir/ille, NY I I Z0)
Phone: {631)r'91.7200 Fcx: (6311191.7/05
(tCnsvlvonio
5dl Cdldo Sre€l
Pilhbursh, PA l5?07
Phon6: l.r I2) 461.1355
tox: 14l21 461'd007
Soutlr Coroliryt
)32 Sporkmon Rood, S,rita B
Columbio, 5C 29209
Phone: 18031 783-1515 tor: 18031 783-4516
Tenrresree
3465 Norh Bend Ckcls
Alcos, TN 37701
Phonc: 18651 970O090
icx; ls65l97oo093
f4u!!lj!l! :/1 Worehour€.Poinl Rood: '
Wolllngford, CI 06492
Ptone; (2031 265510,1
Fox: l?031 265'1870
Florido
Dorrri>rion {.f&od Dlr.slitih/lrrbrtroi.r
Glosr AsT&Ds23.89 l0' mor rt6el ond dlutninurn
Pencil Hordnees ASTMO336340 HB2H slccl ond olvminurn
tloxibiliiy Tgeid ASTMD4ll5a3 P002i rleel ond oluninurr
fl6xibiliry In€id ASTtlOatr5S3 p002)s!€ol
Mondrel ASIMDJ?2,3a {2001 no <ro*inq sleel ond oluninvm
Adhorion ASTl,lD3 35942 no odhosion lorr siccl dnd oluminlrn
Rcv.rua lmpdcl tsIMD2794.q3 119991 no odherion 1066,
no croding
s|eel ond oluminum
Follinq Sond
^Sf^tD968rr
12o0tl 00 liten per mil. DFi shel ond oluminum
Mo/tor Regi6tond ASIM42670r no eftct steel ond oj,rninum
Acid Poluontr A Jr/rAio5.2-91 <5 unir cdor chonge steel ond oluninrm
tuid Ro;n Ke ernidr l0 cycler min.rteel ond olumlnum
Alkqli Rqirtoncc ASTlvtD I 308-02 no cf{ccl steel ond olvminvnr
JOI TO{l A5T ,tBI I ZO2 pooer 3000 hours qlwninum
Sdlt to€ASTT BI I702 po*er l0O0 lourr
Humidlty ,srt{'..D22t7-02 poser 30OO hours olumin0m
Humidity
^stMD22t7-02
posrer 1000 hourr rlccl
Colo. Relsntiori ASIMO8220 |potreg 30oo hourt *el ond oluminum
5. Florido Erporure AS1iltD221L42 not. 5 lniB (hon06 ste€l cnd oluminum
Chdk Reristonce ASIMO42 I d"9I min. roling of 8 slsel ond oluminum
DNId3NSSfDU eraI8z96ll Z1:ZZ 9AAZlZZ/8A
PcrnrGolor 3500-lull thcldh TOiL f,;6ct E0o',/llylrlr Eoooi
Porifis !lu" I.26 . 1.85
sldte tlu. r-xl . E.ls
&.iddrd r.2/. l,!5
Tccl
^ll
ritghr? .olort d6 E^.t# 6rt ..mPtianl.
88/8s fgvd
loYnlBllc 1-25 r E,85
J
!on. tlrfiir. r.6t . L85 Hemlc<k r.28 .l,El
C|$Co
' rhese orc prcnlum or.icod Tahn tyfianl
Dvc to the limitationt ol printing pr'{.eeaoc, lhb color chor]
is nol an cccvrob tqntcn/E/$on ol ov acwol colott'
kmplo <hip orc ovaild&L on rcqugt ot no <ftdrg&
rkrdprd l-26 . I.ts
Gisen
I.zl . LA5
t.26 . t.t5
Cb{r(ool t.29 . t.ls
O.oy
DqYG olly l"2t . 1.85
trtEdord R.3l . t.85
l|owr
t Gdiltn 1,30. l.l5
lFdt
lurgundy 1,32.1.E5
(oloni.rl r,29. E65
r.d r.2t . t,E3
nia ' 135
Siort{ IciD [,35 . t.85 DoeD R4d r-as. E'85
Cqlvol'nno.tlu6'
R,6t . l.l0
Chonpogn
R"ll . 1,85
E{EffiUftm$e
re
--
Frtr.tothcod 0qlwlumal
t,'16 . lr5
t
t
I
"rr.-..'.[Slone r,56 . E.85
Whitr
@ @
-
[ ""'';.:Tri';f;"*"
-nr rJt . :.8s S6td.bn. &5 .t , LBs
c t! tNGrEat rot Dll rlt
8OO-5Ncr.Ell
DNIU]NS53Od E'AIAZ96IL zri.z gaazlzzlaa
September 23,2OOs
Ms. Brenda Parks
Flussenheim Townhomes
3002 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
(fax) 970.845.7339
Re: Re-roof proposal
3000 - 3008 South Frontage Road WesULot 1, Block 5, Vail Intermountain
DR8050456
Dear Brenda,
Thank you for attending Wednesday's Design Review Board public hearing for a final review of a re+oof
proposal at the aforementioned address. As you know, the Design Review Board tabled the request until their
next hearing on October 12'n. The application was tabled primarily due to the following Design Review Board
concerns:
1) The Board does not feel that the stamped shingle pattern on the metal material provides enough relief
to accurately simulate an authentic wood shingle.
2) The Board is not convinced that the metal material is of a heavy enough gauge to ensure "quality over
time" (see Section 14-10-D-6 below) and general longevity.
The following code sections form the basic guide for the Planning Staff and the Design Review Board in their
decision regarding roofing materials throughout the Town:
Secfion 14-10-D:
6. Ihe use of wood shake, concrete tile, slate, metal, asphalt shingle, fberglass shingle, and
built-up tar and gravel roofing may be permitted. Metal roofing, when permitted, shall not reflect
direct sunlight onto an adjacent propefty and shall be suiaced with a low-gloss fnish or be
capable of weathering to a dull ftnish. Metal rcofing, when permitted, shall be of a heavy gauge
and designed to provide visual rclief to the roof surtace (including but not limited to a standing
seam). Asphalt and fiberglass shingles, when permitted, shall weigh no /ess than three hundred
(300) pounds per roofing square. Ihe use of rolled roofing shall not be permitted. The use of any
roofing matertal, including those not specifically identified by thls Section, shall only be permitted,
unless ofherwise prohibited by this Code, where the Design Review Board finds:
a) that the proposed mateial is satisfactory in general appearance, quality over time,
architectural style, design, color, and texture; and,
b) that the use of the proposed material complies with the intent of the provisions of this
Code; and,
c) that fhe use of the proposed material is compatible with the structure, site, sunounding
strucfures, and overall character of the Town of Vail.
The Board also made mention of the submission of a "Master Plan" signifoing the Townhomes' possible
proposal for a future renovation of the building. The Board is not in need of professionally drafred plans, but is
simply interested in the following information:
1) The eventual plan to replace siding and other exterior materials in need of repair;
2) The authenticity and character balance of the proposed materials, including the roofing material;
3) The proposed length of "build-out" time.
I am including several applicable code sections to guide you and the association in the possible draft of a
master olan for the Townhomes.
Sectlon 14-10-D:
1. Predominantly natural building materials shall be used within the Town of Vail. The exterior
use of wood, wood siding, wood shingles, native stone, brick, concrete, sfucco and EIFS may be
permitted. Concrete surfaces, when permitted, shall be treated with texture and color: however,
exposed aggregate is more acceptable than raw concrete. The exterior use of stucco or EIFS
with gross texturcs or surtace features that appear to imitate other materials shall not be
permitted. The erterior use of aluminum, steel, plastic, or vinyl siding that apryarc to imitate
other mateials shall not be pennitted. The exterior use of plywood siding shall not be permitted.
The exteior use of any building material, including fhose nof specifically identified by this Section,
shall only be permitted, unless otherwise prohibited by this Code, wherc the Design Review
Board find:
a) that the proposed mateial ls satlsfaclory in general appearance, quality over time,
architectural style, design, color, and texture; and,b) that the use of the proposed material complies with the intent of the provisions of this
Code: and,c) that the use of the proposed material is compatible with the structure, site, surrounding
strucfures, and overall character of the Town of Vail.
2. The same of similar building materials and colors shall be used on main structure and any
accessory sfructures upon the site.
3. Exterior wall colors should be compatible with the site and surrounding buildings. Natural
colors (eafth tones bound within the Vail area) should be utilized. Pimary colors or other bight
colors should be used only as accents and then sparingly such as upon trim or railings. All
erterior wall mateials must be continued down to finished grade thereby eliminating unflnished
foundation walls. All exposed metal flashing, trim, flues, and roof top mechanical equipment shall
be anodized, painted, or capable of weathering so as fo be non-reflective.
In sum, I have spent much of this morning on the phone with Glenn Rossner, Greg Moffett, and Lars Wahlberg
(w/Tamko) in an attempt to work towards a solution that accommodates you, the Design Review Board, and the
intent of the Vail Town Code. My understanding is that you are interested in proceeding with the Metalworks@
shingle. As the Board mentioned, the likelihood of approval will increase if the longevity and pleasing aesthetic
application of the material can be illustrated. lt would probably be very helpful to provide the Board with a life-
size sample (onsite or elsewhere) of the material on a 10 x 10 board (approximate sizing) and/or pictures of the
material as it exists on other applications within communities that have similar weather pattems as ours. I will
be as instrumental as I can in this orocess.
Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns and I will be more than happy to speak with
you to ensure that we understand our mutual needs. Currently, I will plan for this agenda item to be heard
before the Board again at their next meeting on Wednesday, October 12,2005 at 3 p.m. I know that you are
under a time constraint due to the existing leakage within the building and the impending winter weather, but
thdt is the sqrnest I can schedule this item to be heard. Thank you in advance for your patience and tenacity
during what is not always a simple design review process.
Best Regards,
Elisabeth Eckel
970.479.2454
cc; Mr. Glenn Roggner
719.528.1043 (fax)
Mr. LarsWalberg
Tamko Rooflng Producte
1.800.841.1925 (fax)
From:
To:
Date:
SubJeo'l:
Bill Gibson
Elisabeth Eckel; Wanen Campbell
091141200510:59:17 AM
Re: metal rooflng requlrements
Per building code minimums. I think the UBC required 12 & 14 gauge, depending upon flat or sloping roof
design. However, it may be completely different under the IRC (i.e. single-family & duplex) and/or IBC (i.e.
commercial & multiple-family).
Joe is researching the issue.
>>> Elisabeth Eckel 09/'1412005 10:50:51 AM >>>
Gents:Do we specfi anyrhere what we mean by "heavy gauge" metal roofing? ls there a certain weight
that we are requiring but that is not written in the Development Standards Handbook? lt would be very
helpful to b€ able to define this specifically and give applicantrs specific answers when they ask about this
issue.Thoughts??Elisabeth
I think the cunent language gives the DRB & straff some discression in specific applications to ask for
more than the "minimum" reguired bythe building codes. Thls authority needs to be preserved with any
text amendment adding a referencs to the building codes or a specific gauge.
>>> Elisabeth Eckel 09/1412005 't 1'02'29 AM >>>
Good to know..thanks for the update. Do you think there is any merit to referencing the applicable code in
the standards, onc€ w€ know what cod€ dictates the gauge?
From:
To:
Dde:
SubJect:
Bill Gibson
Elisabeth Eckel; Warren Campbell
o9l14l200511:52:02 AM
Re: metal rooling requirements
per Joe the building code requirements vary by material gpe, roof slope, and application = no simple
answer
>>> Elisabeth EckelO9l14l805 10:50:51 AM >>>
Gents:Do we speciff anywhere what we mean by "heavy gauge, m€tal roofing? ls there a certain weight
that we are requiring but that is not written in the Development Standards Handbook? lt would be very
helpful to be able to define this specifically and give applicants specific answers when they ask about this
issue.Thoughts??Elisabeth
From:
To:
Dats
Subject:
Elisabeth Eckel
brenda Parks
091281200511133:44 AM
Flussenheim Townhomes
Hello Brenda:
Just checking in to se€ h-ow things are going, in every respect. Also, lwanted to let you know that I am
going to be out of town Cr the 12th, when the re-roof is scheduled to be heard by the DRB again.
Therefore, any proposed changes to the cunent proposal will need to be to me by next FridJy, October
7th. I wouldnt want you to have to wait until the meeting on the 19th.
Please let me know if I can be of any help.
See 1pu tomonor night at my place.
Elisabeth
rrri
It::-tl i il-:ri I
F---Tr I lF=."J| i fi ilt lF-*--J I I il--*ll I It-__ tr I
- _ -. .lJ_t
lF€i.<:$_-.".q ilil:F-11 i tt:=t :tL_Jt I *€:=rJ,
I*-l
l*::J 7*t
i
', ,,^:x\!\l ! \,-. .--<- =JFf z\' \) "-/j --.-= R 5?I : t*i--Sc 'slt\i3J ! __ --.__ :< _+,i -R-=\--=S <J j .3 S "d- J : =.c-9R i s--v\aEo i, ,B '=.=R:\ s t\ -tu-E E b e\ie---J -r * s3e :(3=?'\\a R R.3=€A : :.=B >+4 F*-*t=E eJ c<s <. \-=ss-
I
i
I
I
r
/--t
I
l
,_N
I
I
I --.-=--_>
i\
(
i
N
,/'-\
ft> n'
. )x,-'<
-.*
*
(:
6,s g
s h s
R
hb
\*J
h:)F,
\qA
-Rr-,+s \r\
s l\
I
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VATL, CO 8L657
970-479-2L38
Job Address...:Location......:
Parce1 No.....:
ProjecE Number:
DEPARIMEIiff OF COMMT]NITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
MECHANICAL PERMIT Permit #: M00-0006
/ata,4/l g
I U. -7nt/6,4///t'A1"
*Of Gas lJoga:
Status...: ISSUED Apptied..: 02/03/2000
Issued. . . : 02/1,7/2000
Expires. . : 08/1-5/2OOO
crrY vA 23030
Phone1. 970-827-5736
Valuation:5, 718 . 00
*of wood/PrlLer:
Mechani.cal- ->
Plan Check--- >
InveelLEaElon>
wil.1 ca]l---->
120.00
30-00
.00
3 .00
. oo
.00
153 ,00 153 . O0
153 .00
Rescuara'ri Pl.an Revicr, - - >
DRB F€e------
TOTAL FEES. -. -. -
Tocal calculac6d Fcc6- - ->153 . O0
Addltional Fees-- -----> .00
Totsal Pemit Fee-------->
gayrnenes-------
BATANCE DUE---- - -OO
1.a
TTCM: O51OO BUILDING DEPARTMENT DCPI: BUILDING DiViSiON;02/03/2000 CIIARLTE .A,ction: APPR see condi-tions iEam;'o5eoo-Frne DEPARTMENT Dept: FrRE Dlvision:
02/03/20oo G{ARLTE Action: APPR n/a
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
FIELD INSPE TIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE EOMPLIANqE.tne-new boifei-wifl be l6cated where exisitng boiler scood Tiia nen 6oIIe- is-afdove rated but due to stfuctral qonstrai
nEs a-minimum of 30" will not acheived in fronts of, the.Uolfer nowever there will be enough room to provide mainEene Eel-e-rii6-sEop-muaa be inst.alled"at the'Bu-vent penetratio n throuqh t,he eeilinq.tfre wifls ind-ceilini musL have a l--HR fire resistiwe consEr ucLion j.nstalled.rniEiraEion-oF-; C/o detect.or is requiled due !o the facts of
E6w-EEe-eomaii opehing-is insEalled'and a CloEhes Dryer is Iocated within the same sPace
r/n'/eirn 6,t/as
3006 S FRONTAGE RD WEST
3005 S Frontage Rd
2103 -154 - 0g - 002
OWNER FRTTZ DONALD E & .TACQUEI,INE M
4421 KIMAGES WHARF RD, C=IARI-,ES
COI{IRACTOR .]ERRY SIBLEY PLUMBING
P O BOX 340, MTNTIIRN CO 8l-545
Descripti-on:
Replace boj-Ier due to failure
FireDlace Informalion: Restricted: N *Of cas Appliances:
FEE SUI4I4ARY
********************************************************************************
DECLARATIONS
f heieby acknolrlldgc thaL I have read tshie applicaEion, filled ouE in fu]1 thc inforEslion lcquiled, cobpl.ted aD accuraEs plo!
plan. and stat6 lhats a1f fha infot1natsion piovid.d ae required is corr€cE. I agree to coEPly ni€h tshe informagion and PloC P1an,
ho comply lritsh all Toflrr ordinances and staCe la$s, and eo build this scructure accordj.ng to th6 Tosn's zoning and subdiwiEion
cod6s, d6sigrl revie!, approved, Unj.forn BuildinE code and otsher oldinanc€E of the Tosn aPplicablc gheleio-
REQUESTS FOR II{SPECIIONS SIIAT,!, BE I'ADE
o
TWENrY .FOI'R HOURS IN
SIGIqTURE OA OWNER OR COMTRACTOR FOR HIMSELT AND Owl{ER
IcE FROM Sr00 AM 5:0o Ptl
****l+l****:r*********t*tl*i*i*l*i********l***l****ii***tat****t*t
TOWN OF VAfL, COLORADO Statemnt
****ra***al*tl*li***a*****tt*+t***at********t*{****lltl****lt*******
Stat emnt Num.ber: REC-O5o? Amount: 153.OO O2/!7/OO 09 t1,L
Payment MeEhod | 27427 Notatj.o!.: SIBITEY PLI,!{BING Init: JN
Permlt No:
Parce] No:
Site AddJ.ese :
Location:
This Pa)ment
MoO-oo05 Type r
2103-t-54-08-002
3OO5 S F'ROMTAGE
3006 S Frontage
B-MECH MECIIANICAI PERIIIT
RD WEST
Rd
Total Fees:
***ll'lAa***il********tt*l**l+tr*********!r**i**i**t*******++***tat**
Account code De6criDtion
153.00 Tota} AJ.,L Pmts:
Balance :
153 .00
153 .00
.oo
Amount
FEES 120.00
30.00
3.00
MP00100003r-r"1300 I4ECIIANICALPERMIT
PF 00100003L12300 PLAI{ CHECK FEES
wc 001000031L2800 WILL cALr, INSPEqTIoN FBB
(
)PARcBL
-t bi isn r,s o al}lH"?i xiJi,ffI;3$"ffff" I onn: Hi-/ oo
PERI'ITT #
, APPLICATTON MUST BE FTLLED OUT COMPLETELY OR IT MAY NOT BE ACCEPTED U I* * * * * * *
'h
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PERMIT fNFORMATfON *,r * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *:r * * * * * * * * * * *rl|
[ ]-Buildinq [ ]-prrrrnhing [ ]-Electrical [rJ-Mechani-cat [ ]-other
Legal Description: Lot BLock
Owners Nane:
Architect I
ceneral Description:
Work Class:
Filinq
ELECTRICAL: $
ItEcHANIcAr,, $fu
[ ]-New [ ]-Alterarion [ ]_Addirionar tyl_nepair J l_orher
Num-ber of Dwelling Units, I bs Nuaber of Accommodation Units:
F*tt
and Tlpe of Fireptaces: Gas Appliances- cas Logs_ wood/perlet
f********************************* vALUATToNs *************************************************************
BUILDTNG: $
PLTI'IBTNG:T-
A,ddress:
llectrical Contractor:\ddress:
)J.unbing Contractor:
lechanicaL Contractor:
,ddress:
*******************************
FOR UTLDING PERMTT FEE:
LUI,fBING PERMIT FEE:
ECIIANTCAL PERMIT FEE:
LECTRTCAL TEE:
IHER TYPE OF FEE:
RB
.FEE:
OTHER: $
ToTAL:f----l---_..-li_l-
H:::i.;:il:::l:: ;
* * * * * * * * * colrrRAcroR rNFoRr,fArroN ***************************
Town of Vail Req. NO.Phone Nunber:
Town of VaiI Req. NO.Phone Nunber:
Torsn of VaiI Reg. No.lJlf Phone Nunber: dd-621-=rown or uurr. *"o.ffif'*
Phone Nuaber:
oFFrcE usE *******************************
BUTLDING PIAN CTIECK FEE:
P-II'I.IBTNG PI,AN CHECK FEE:MECIIANTCAL PI,AN CHECK FEE:RECREATION FEE:
CLEAN-UP DEPosrT!
TOTAL PERHTT FEES:
BUTLDTNG:
STGNArURE:
ZONING:
SIGNATURE:
VAI;UATION
;EAI{ TTP DEPOSIT REIT}{D tro:
!l
J tr -+
4 o ,-.i t
-9 E
.3
{a)3
\L
a
bO
V
t4 o {r saa
-9 t5 qJ€ \Y_-<:-62 s-
!'-J- J 7\044 S6 :b r-I _9o qJ j"A -l
40'd
ll lF-'ht---+l \
3
{t z
'],'tI dsr we9-LCB-oL6:.xel 9S:6 m, t qej
o I c. I
n
-
T
ta x (t
llr=
I.'
JSP INC.
EFFICIENT 8T ICAL
GAs FIRED uBrg7ffi HOT WATER HOI4 I'IEATING
SERIES 7.K 28
'00
O
B
Feb 3 Fax:970-827-5234
'00 I Feb JSP INC.F I
BURNHAPl RED
HOT WATER EOI
Quality
heatiryptu
can counton.
lfyou're investigating a healing
system for your new home, or ifYou're
replacing an old, inefncient, or worn'
out boiler, agas'frred hot water boilcr
from Burnhanr is the honte heating
investment that's right for you.
Burnham's Series 2A boiler
offers you all the benefrts o[ hot watcr
heat togerher wirlt lhe advantages of
quality cast iron constructiotl and
advanced engineering. When you
spcify Burnham, you gct home
hcating that is comfortable.
economical, and reliable-all from a
hoiler that's safe. quiet, and held
proven in thousands of installations.
A clean burning, energy
efhcient heating system is more
important now than ever belbre. All
Series 2A models- standing pilot and
electronic ignition-rneet or exceed the
tqs2 federal ninimum effrciency
standards.
lfyour pqesent boilut is like
rnany older gas boilers, it's probably
operatirrg at an annual cfficicncy of
only 6O%. Which means much of the
heat you paid for is going right up the
chim ney, So when you uPgrade to a
Burnhanrs series 2A gas boiler with
an efficicncy up to 82.6%, you gel
urore usable heat for your dollar.
Burnham makes heating Your
home with natural gas a Ptactical
investment today, and orre you'll
appreciate over tht' years.
llydronic heating -the home
comfon a&antage
Hcat and comforl go hand in
hand at Burnham. The series 2A gas
boiler generates hot water which is
transmitted through pipes to heat
ax:.970-82752U
room ofyour home. This type of
heating, referred to as hydronic
ting, has proved itsclfovcr the
to be thc most cffective and
comfort system available.
A well designed, ptoperly
ained hydronic systent will
you wilh long term comfort
economy. You'll never cxperience
and cold spots or drafts so
with forccd air systenls. You
be bothered hy airborne dust,
odor. or germs being carried
room to room. And hydronic
can be easily zoned, saving
while providing cornfortable
in the various living
ofyour home.
ln short, hydronic heating is
, Inore versatile, and more
than alternative heating
And Burnham is your key to
hydronic hcating advanmge.
lron Dependability
Burnham builds Amcrica's
working, most dependable
heating boilers. A rugged cast
heat exchanger gives the Series
boiler outstanding drrrability and
free performance. And the cast
sections are designed to extract
maximum amount of heat,
fuel consumption and saving
noney.
The sections are loined with iton
that resist petroleum-based
including anti-frceze, which
deteriorate the gasken used in
competitors' boilers.
flus, only Burnham boihrs come
the erclusive lton Nipple Seal of
lability catifying lhe use of a
method of boiler construction
assures reliable performance tbl a
The iron nlpples expand and
wl$ the cast iron boiler scc-
P.U
'l'his ensures thc
integrity ofthe
entire section
assembly. ,rime'
pnven iron nipples
last the lifc ofthe
boiler.
ComfortYou Can Count On
When you select a Burnham
boller-you're buying nrore than iust
heat. Burnham has earned a
repuntion for quality and
depcndability going back to 1873. And
Burnham is dedicated to insuring that
your Burnham boiler provides your
fanrily with reliable home heating
comforr. Thai's why the Burnham
Series 2A boiler is backed by winter
warmth Assuraflce-.the most
comprehensrve warranty program in
the industry. When purchased through
a nrenrber of America's Home I leating
Tcam, this unique lromeowner
protecion plan offers rnaximum
prorection with s-year Blanket
Coverage that pays n0% of lhe cost
for qualifed tepairs for five fitll years
after inslallation. All you need to do
is talk to a local Burnham pluntbing
and heating contractor offering,
winter warmth Assutance.
And thar's not all. Burnham is
the only manufacturer that backs its
producrs with a Lifetime 'ltue-Blue
Limited warranty on thc hol watel
hcat cxchanger. lt's all parl of
Buanham winter warmlh Assurance,
rhe honest deal in honle hearing,.
tlrcy ioin.
r
a
INC.JSP
close close! situations. lt is ideal
condominiums, townhouscs and
homes without basements.
'the Series 2A is equilDed
split conuols: an operating/high
control, a transformer and a
relay. By using off-the-shclf
controls instead of a combinatlon
control, Bumham has simPtified
conuol replaccmer and rcduced
reptacemcnt costs. 'lltc location of the
controls also nakes regular servicing
casler,
The safe, home heating
ahernatlve
lbur farnily's safety is infrnitely
morc lmportant than fucl savings.
Ttrereforc, the Scrles 2A deslgn
lncorporates a broad array of safety
features,
For oomPle, each standard
Scries 2A boilcr has a time-Proven
saftty feature with ics own backuP
systcm. tf ]ou los€ Pilot tlame. a
tlrcrmocouplc supcrvlsor sends a
slgrul to a rerlundant gas valve
cuBingoffttrc gas oow
Also all exterlor wirlng is
enclosed in metal casing to protect
agalnst accidental shocks.
Gag valves and controls are
P.05
safely hidden inside the iacket away
from children and 6afe from accidental
bumps and tampering.
A Flame Roll-out Switch (FRS) '
sandard on all 2A orcdels. is a
ttEnna[y activatcd switdr, located
ncar the burners, that senses
rcmpentures in thc vestibule.
For exanplc, if
the fluways,
within the
boiler, become
bbclcedor
rcstricted, the
flame rollout
switch will
autornatically
shut off gas flors lo Prcvcnl damage
to your boiler. Once tlrc switch is
acri\,"ated it musr be rcplaced. The
boiler cannot be restart€d until tlrc
obstruction is cleared and a new
switch is installed.
ax:.9?0-827-5234 '00
o
Feb
f.({
BURNHAt,lO
HOT WATER
E5 ZA
SBOlLE
DOI tlertlng CaPabi I lti6
51to e44 flBll
Desiqned tofit
tiqlrt-closet
iri3tallations
The S€rics 2A boilcr was
dcsigncd specifical! for homes
space i6 a premium. lte controls
gauge are located up front so the
Scries 2A can be installed even ln
F
a
INC.JSP ax:970-827-5234
t"
i
!
P.06
Anoaher sal'ety feature included
is a Flocked Vent switch (BVs) that is
rhermally acrivatcd if a blockage in
the venting
system occurs.
The switch
senseS
excessive heat
exiting the draft
hood and shuts
otTgas llow.
Fuel savlng option that
lrrcreases annual effl ciency
The series 2A boiler can b€
equipped with a fuelsaving electronic
ignifion system which improves energy
effrciency. (El is standard on the 2024
and 2084 2104.)
Elecrronic ignition is available
on all sizcs of the Series 2A boilcrs
frring natural gas or LP gas. Coupled
with a rcdundantgas valve, the
system safely shuts down on loss of
pilot flame in less than onc second.
You get all this in a complctcly
factory asscmbled boiler with a sleek,
compact appearance. Its efncient
design rnakes it much smaller than
rnost older boilers.
Comfort without sacrifice
Too oftcn honteowners end up
giving up conrlbrt, endure frequcnt
breakdowns and servit:e calls, and
takc safety risks just to bring down
thcir fuel bill.
with a Burnham,x Series 2A
'gas-fire d hot w.rter boiler, you don't
have to rlrake sacrifices. Our Scries 2A
is your long-ternl inves(menl in
quality, dependable horrrc hea ting.
'00
o
Feb
,l
I I-
J
I
--..t.
I
I
I --T----.l---
l.- r '-1 lr
I oil'i-
-
JSP INC.ax:970-827-5254
d|ndrnltrds.
F I
5
Feb . T e:se P.07
-.V-o Burrrharri
AJ\/|€RICA5 BOIIf R COMPAA'Y 5PECIFICANON
sEilES ZA nAnHGS Nanral r.pcas S@@ m +
20.24
z[,s.A
zBIA r 206A Y 206A
2OTA - zOEA
?D9A \2toA
N/ANC r{,allrtb
usrarmV-t0 Psl vsrtl$ Ft'ss.r
DOE bdtlry caprtyand |nnrrl cmdcnry rtc b8.d on uS.
Rrdd [tocEot-.l|l A.6.4 rednrt $own rt for ill3lalhtbns u sca lcrd and " ofl r pcrci (ri) broadl l'0oo ft. abovc tcs kvd
up !o 2,OOO ft. For d6/rti.xts abovc 2.0oo ft. A.G.A' rirlngt should bc Gduccd al tlE ratc
(2t i,lrt t'.B!ti rrdnSr slbn n ar. b|scdon no(mal l=8.-R ' ' ptl-up rcqutsnirs such !s l dml@nt systcm of 4r
nd rkt up allornncc of 1.5 . Col|'uh Eurnhrm fot insalletioN hrving unusurl Plplng rnd
mc'nrlvc'pipirg rystsms. ac.
zuELSAVINGEQIJIPMENT:
STANDARD:
FUELSAVING
VENTDA}TPER_
lrueascs aruual e6dcrY ard saves
fucl dollars. Alrmarically closcs
the flue after the btrner druts off
and reopens it again before the
bumer comes on. Moun6 and wircs
easily, indudes prewired connec-
tbn harncss with plug for rue on all
2{v Standing Plot br El control
sysrcms.
ond try for pilot religh following
shutdown. f aftcr this lensth ot shutdown. It aner tnul rcngln oI
time the pllot is not re-established, q!!:gntlle system g!€s 0n
31
52
EO
l08
136
t6x
l9l
2t8
214
ELECTNOMCIGNITION_
Standardon202A&
2084-2104
spark i8nircd pilot (El) is available
on all sizes for natural & LP gas.
Couple d widr a rcdurdant gas valve
the svslem shuts down oh loss of
oibt [arnc within .8 sec. Tte ontrol
irrangcmcnt pryvidcs for a 90 sec-
UBrrrfrarri
Amerra's BoiFI ComPanY
B|J'nham Corpotatnn
safew sliutdown for tve mlnutes. 'nlis 90 second try/fivc
minute strutdorn cyclc continues unttl the pllot Is esrablished'
Ffim t{o. 41708-6/93-sot
Frintod in u.s.A.
O 10tr2 Bu?nham Corpora$on. Lancaltor' PA
{x15
4xl5
5x15
6xl5
6xl5
7xl5
7xl5
ExlS
8xl5
E2.3
82.6
82.3
E2.O
81.7
El.4
8t.2
00.9 .
80.6
N/A
80.0
E0.t
&,2
80.3
EQ.{
N/tr
N/A
N/A
Feb 3 10:00 P.08 '00 I ax:970-8275234 F
o
JSP II€.
JSP Il'lC.
60
70
,,
3lt0
70
n
24
I I
Fax;970-827-5234
u
50
t3
u3
5!
{0
ttl
fa
t00
Feb 3 10:01 P.09 '00
o
iS-Ploll
t.30+lDll-w&s
iH. 85-W<
/€
j ll-3
G{+lDf{
eot
TGO€
fi
5E
01
280
GI
55
199
15
fl5
REPTI3l Toul| oF VAIL, COLORADO PAGE 4
AREA: CD 02/lA1206o O7238 REoUESTS - rilSPECTtl toRK SHEETS FoR: 2/LA/2O
Act1v{ty: SOO-OOOE zlLglz0 Type: B-ltECH Status; ISSUED Gonetr: AAPT
Addrees: 3OOB S FROHTAGE RD XEST
LocatLon: 3OOG Si Frontage Rd
Percel.: 2IO3-I54-OA-OO2
Deacrlptl.on: Repl-ace bol-ler due to failure
Appll.cant:
Orner: FRITZ DOIIALD E & JACOUELIIE f
Contractor: JERRY SfBLEY PLUIIBIIIE
Occ:Uge:
Phone:
Phone:
Phone: 979-8.27-3736
Irrapectlon Requeet
Requeetor: CHUCK
Req Tine: OBTOO
Itene requeeted to
OO39O IIECH-FInaI
Informatlon. . . ..
Connente: tfILL CALL
be Inepected. .
Phone: A27-5736
Tine Exp
InapectLon Iter:Iter:Itenl Iter:Itel:
Iten:Iter:
Hlatory.....
OO2OO IIECH-Rough
OO?41D PLilB-Gaa PtpLng
OO3lO IIECH-Heating
911320| IIECH-Exhaugt Hoode
OO33g IIECH-Supply Alr
OO34O ItECH-ltlec.
O939O IIECH-FI-naI
.t
l'on Connents
2)t-.-v'h.' C,+J)dr
r \ a .l r-\t tl{ t>t-\r-t +a,:
)<'+"'h-e'
CHECK REQAEST
s ,I a*. L D{t) -J-z-1/-I J PREPARED BY: 6il-
VENDORNAW' K r'*
VENDORNUMBER: -T- cl V o { 3
DESCRIpTION OF EXPENSE: CLEAN UP DEPOSIT REFUND FOR BP # ,'4 !6 'oy t
NAME oF JoB: 3 a- " oh , C L uuL'-- \L( q "
ACCOUNTNUMBER: 01 0000 22002
AMOLJNT OF REFUND: *, o (c -
DATE APPROVED: t t- lz'A/ ? t
APPROVAL SIGNATURE:
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
vArL, co 81657
97 0-47 9-2L38
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT
PROJECT TITLE: MARR KITCHEN REMODEL
ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT Permit
ALL TIMES
896-0216
Job Address
Location...
Parcel No..Project No.
APPLICANT KITCHENS BY DESIGN, TNC.
P.O. BOX 3660, EAGLE, CO
CONTRACTOR KITCHENS BY DESIGN, INC.
P.O. BOX 3660, EAGLE, CO
OWNER MARR SARAH A & CHARLES A
762 HOLLT ST, DENVER CO
Recreation Fac------>
cl.ean-up Deposil-----t
3008 S FRONTAGE RD WEST Status..
3008 S. FRONTAGE RD epplied.2103-154-08-001 Issued. .PRJ96-0125 Expires.
f' t,)-,./
816 31
816 31
80220
ISSUED
07 /25/Lee6
08 /06 / Lee 6
02 /02 / LeeT
Descri-ption:REMODEL OF KITCHEN Nunber of Dwelling Units: 000
Town of vail Adjusted Valuation: 10r915
Fi rlDLac. lnformation: Restri cted:fOf Gas Appt i ances:#0f Gas Logs:fof tlood/Pa l. Let:
FEE SUIII,IARY
Bui Ldi ng--> 155.00
Ptan check---> 100.75
Inv:stig.tion> .m
l,il,t Cal,l,--> 3.m
Restuarant Ptan Reviev-->.m Tota t Catculated Fees-->556.75
Add itional, Fees-----> .00
.00 Total Pernit Fce--->
Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
08/06/1996 DAN Action: APPR Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
o7/25/1996 CHARLTE Action: APPR Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT
O7/25/L996 CHARLIE Action: APPR Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS
07/25/r996 CHARLTE Acrion: APPR
Phonez 328-1270
Phonet 328-L270
PayBents------
BAL NCE DUE--------->
Dept: BUILDING Division
Dept: PLANNING Division
Dept: FfRE Division
Dept: PUB WORK Division
."1m.m
558.75
358.75
35E.75
N/A
N/A
N/A
See Page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit.
DECLARATIONS
I h.rcby acknovtedge that I have fead th'is apptication, fil,ted out in futl the 'infornation rcqui rcd, conptctld an accurate ptot
Pl'rn, lnd statc thst aLL thc infofnation providrd .s rrquir.d is correct. I agrcc to conp Ly yith thc intorr.tion and pLot pl,an,
to comPty Hith al,l, Tovn ordinanccs and 3tat. [avs, and to buiLd this structure according to tha lo]rn's zoning and subdivision
codes, design reviev approvcd, tlniform Buil,ding code and other ordinances of thc Toyn appticable thrrlto.
REOUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE TTADE TI.IEIITY-TOUR HO{JRS IN ADVAIICE gY T€LEPHONE AT 2138 0R AT oUR oFttCE FRO|I
S.nd Clcan-up 0eposit To: KITCHENS BY DESIGN SIGNAIURE CO TRACTOR FOR HI'ISELF AT{O OI'NER
PAGE 2
********************************************************:l***********************
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAI Permit *: 896-0216 as of 08/06/96 Stat,us: ISSUED
*****************************************************************************!t**
Perrnit Tlpe: ADD/ALT SFR BUrtD PERMIT Applicant: KITCHENS BY DESIGN, INC.
Job AddresE: 3008 S FRONTAGE RD WEST Location: 3008 S. FRONTAGE RD Parcel No: 2103-154-08-001
Applied: 07 /25/L9e6 rssued: 08 /06 /L996
*****************************************************************************+**
CONDITIONS ***************************************************:r****************************
1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
2. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED IN ALL BEDROOMS AND EVERY STORY
AS PER SEC.1210 0F THE 1991 UBC.
3. NO EXPANSION OF GRFA A]-,LOWED, PERMIT IS GOOD FOR KITCHEN
COSMETIC REMODEL ONLY
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657
970-479-2138
E Iectri ca [--->
DRB FCe
Inv.stigati on>
UitL Cltt--_>
TOTAL FEES--->
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit #: 895-0165
Job Address Location...
Parcel No..Project No.
50.m
.00
.(x)
3.m
55.00
ISSUED
07 /25/Lee6 08/06 /Lee6 02/02 /Lee7
3008 S FRONTAGE RD WEST Status. . .
3008 s FRONTAGE RD Applied..2103-154-08-001 Issued...PRJ95-0125 Expires..
APPLICANT KTTCHENS BY DESIGN OWNER }[ARR SAAAH A & CHARLES A
762 HOLLY ST, DENVER CO 80220
Description: KITCHEN REMODEL Valuation:715 . 00
FEE SUITITARY
TotaL Catcutsted Fees-->
AdditionaL Fers---->
Totat Perni t Fec----)Payrcnts-*---->
EAL NCE DUE------->
53.m
.m
53.m
53.00
,m
Ite.m: 06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT 08/06/1996 DAN Action: APPR
Dept: BUILDING Division:
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQ'D TQ CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE 2. ALL WORK MUST ABIDE BY THE 1996 NEC
REOUESTS FOi IIISPECTTOIIS SHALL BE IIADE TUEIITY-FOUR HOURS tII ADVANCE BY
DECLARATIONS
l_hcrcby.rcknoul'cdgc that I havc rcad this lppLicrtion, fil,Lcd out in fuLL thc inforEtion required, conpLctrd rn accurate ptot ptan, and statc that a[[ thc inforration providcd as rcquircd. is corfcct. I agrcc to corpLy vith tirc inionation and plot itan,to coQl'y vith al'l' Tovn ordinances tnd statc [avs, lnd to buitd this stpuctura-rccording iotht Toyn,g aoni ng rnd subdivision coder, design rcvicr approvcd, Uniforu &ri tding code lnd othlr ordinancrs of thc Tovn appticabl,c thcreto.
.--************:r*************************************************!r*
TOWN OF VArL, COLORADO Statemnt
****************************************************!t***********
Statemnt Number: REC-0180 Amount:
Payment Method: CK Notation: *4704
53.00 08/06/96 15:03 Init: DS
E96-0165 Type: B-ELEC ELECTRICAL PERMIT
210 3-154-08-0 01
3OO8 S FRONTAGE RD WEST
3OO8 S FRONTAGE RD Total I'ees:53.00 Total AtL Pnts:
Balance:****************************************************************
Permit No:Parcel No:Site Address:
Location;
This Payment
Account Code 01 0000 41313 01 0000 41336
Description
ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES
WILL CAIL INSPECTION FEE
53. 00
53. 00
.00
Amount
50. 00
3. 00
TOWN OF VAIL
?5 S. FRONTAGE ROAD vArL, co 81657
970-479-2L38
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT AI,L TIMES
PLI'MBING PERMIT Permit #: P96-0116
Job Address: 3008 S FRONrAGE RD WEST Status...: ISSUED Location...! 3008 S FRONTAGE RD Applied..t 07/25/1996
Parcel No..: 2103-154-08-001 Issued...t 07/25/1996
Project No.: PRJ96-0125 Expires..z 0L/2L/1997
COLORADO PLIJMBING SERVICE Phone: 9?09459809
45705 HrGr{WAY 6 &. 24, GLSNWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
COLORADO PLIII4BING SERVICE Phone: 9709459809
45705 HTGHWAY 6 e 24, GLENWOOD SPRTNGS, CO 81601
OVINER MARR SARAH A & CHARLES A
762 HOLLY ST, DENVER CO 80220
Description: REMODEL OF KITHCEN Valuation:1,200 .00
fEE SUIII{ARY
APPLICANT
CONTRACTOR
P tu-i ng.__>
PLdr chcck->
Invc3tigEtiort
Ti tt catt->
30.m Restuarrnt Ptan Revis.*-->7.5O ToTAL FEES----->
.m
3.m
.00 Total, Cal,cutatcd Fcca->40.50 Addition L F.rs----->
Tot! t Perrit Fec---)Payrcnts--
Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Dept: BUILDING Division:07/25/L996 CHARLIE Action: APPR CHARLIE DAVIS I!e{Ii'.950q0_EIB-E_DEP4RTI{ENT Dept: FIRE Division:07/25/L996 CHARLTE Actiont APPR N/A
CONDITION OF APPROVAT
1. FIELD INSPECTIOSN ARE REQ'D TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE 2. ALL WORK MUST ABIDE BY THE 1994 UPC
DECLARATIONS
40. 50
.00
40.50
40.50
accuPate ptot
and plot pt!n,
suMivision
I hcrcby ackttoulcdgc th.t I hlvr rcad this lpplication/ fitl,cd out in futl, the inforration requircd, corptctcd an pttn, and state thlt alt th. infoflEtion providad as fequir.d is corrlct. I lgrcc to corpl,y rrith thc inforFtion to corPty uith al,l, Towr ordinances and stat! (ars, and to build this structurc according to the To4an's zoning atd
codcs, dasign rrvi ev approvad, unitor! BuiLding codc and oth.r ofdinanccs of tht Toyn rppl,ic.blc th.rcto.
NEq'ESTS FOR INSPECTTOI{S SHALL BE IADE TTIENTY-FOIJR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE 4T)-21t8 AT OUR OFFICE FROII
SIGI{AIURE AilD Ot'tt{ER
**.t**********************
TOViN OF VAIL, COLORADO
************************************
Statemnt
I ***
*************************************+**************************
Statemnt Nunber: REC-0180 Amount:40.s0 08/06/96 15:04 Init: Ds Payment Method: CK Notation: #4704
PLUI,IBING PERMIT
Total Fees:40.50 Total ALL Pnts:
Balance:
******************************il*********************************
Permit No:
ParceL No:Site Address:
Location:
Thie Payment
Account Code
01 0000 4131r
01 0000 4t332
01 0000 41336
P95-0116 Type: B-PLMB
2103-154-08-001
3OO8 S FRONTAGE RD WEST
3OO8 S FRONTAGE RD
40 .50
40 .50
.00
Description
PLI,]MBING PERMIT FEES
PLAN CHECK FEES
WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE
AInount
30.00
7 .50
3 .00
:iL
TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
vArL, co 81657
97 0-47 9 -2J.38
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
Job Address: 3008 S FRONTAGE RD WEST Status...
Location. . .: 3008 S FRONTAGE RD Applied. .
Parcel No. . : 2103-154-08-001 Issued. . .
Proiect No.: Expires..
*****************'(ff(ffi(#**ff**jrffiddrHrlr************i*****ff*ffi******H*|t****ffiffiffi****t**ir*
Item: 06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT Dept: BUILDING Division:t0/01/L996 CHARLTE Action: APPR FOR ERNST
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1, FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQ'D TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowtedge that I have read this apptication, fitted out in ful,t the information required, compteted an accurate ptot
plan, and state that atl the inforDation provided as required is cofrect..I agree to conpty with thc infofmation and ptot pLan,
to compty vith al.l, Town ordinances and state tavs, and to buiLd this structure according to thc Torrnrs zoning and subdivision
codes, design reviev approved, Un'iform Buil,ding Code and other ordinances of the Town appl,icabtr thereto.
REouEsTs foR INSPECTIoi{S SHALL BE I|ADE TiIENTY-FoUR HoURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHoNE AI 479-?138 0R AT oUR OFfICE t Rof,l 8:@ All 5:00 P
ISSUED
ro /or /ree 6
ro /0t / tee 6
03/30/tee7
z3-44.L5
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit #: E96-0238
Description: ELEC REMODEL OF KITCHEN
******#*r#irl*#(*****irlitr*ti*tiffi**tffi*rr*t*trf* FEE SUi4I4ARY
WESTERN CO. ELEC. CONTROL SPEC.
P.O. BOX 414, RTFLE, CO 81650
WESTERN CO. ELEC. CONTROL SPEC.
P.O. BOX 414, RTFLE, CO 81650
MARR SARAH A & CHARLES A
762 HOLLY ST/ DENVER CO 80220
50.00
.00
.00
3.00
53.00
Phone: 970-625-44L3
Valuation:1,000.00
APPLICANT
CONTRACTOR
OWNER
E Iect ri ca [--->
oRB Fee
Investigation>
1,1i tl cal. t---->
TOTAL FEES--->
TotaI CatcuLated tees--->
Additional Fees--------->
TotaI Permit tee-------->
Phone: 970-6
53.00
.00
)J. UU
53.00
.00
Payments
BALANCE DUE-----
-\
****************************************************************
rowN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statemnt ****************************************************************
Statemnt Number: REC-0212 Amount:53.00 L0/02/96 0e:17 rnit: cD Payment Method: CK Notation z #2706
E96-0238 Type: B-ELEC ELECTRICAL PERMIT
210 3-15 4-0 8-0 01
3OO8 S FRONTAGE RD WEST
3OO8 S FRONTAGE RD
Total Fees:53.00 lotal ALL Pnts:
BaLance:****************************************************************
Permit No:
Parcel No:
Site Address:
Location:
This Paynent
Account Code
01 0000 41313
01 0000 4t336
Description
ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES
WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE
53.00
53.00
.00
Amount
50.00
3.00
1g-1-r^p7o-:ie-sqqp ;"; ,",";ilr-o* oF vArL coNsrRucrJ
I{PARcEL /l: Zloala4naoot -pifutrr ApplrcArroN FoRM I D^rE,7.L4.qb
owners Name:
Ph.
r
I
Address:
Mechanical Contractor:Town of Vail Reg. No.
Phone Nunber:Address:
*******************************tt FOR oFFrcE usE *******************************BUTLDING PERMIT FEE:
PLUMBING PERMIT FEE:
UECHANTCAL PERMTT FEE:
ELECTRTCAL FEE:
OTHER TYPE OF FEE:
DRB FEE:
BUI],DTNG PI,AN CHECK FEE;
PLUMBTNG PI,AN CHECK FEE
MECHANICAL
TOTAL
BUTLDING:
STGNATURE:
ZONING:
SIGNATURE:
***************************
Town of Vail Reg. NO.SU>b
Phone Nunber: fuAA_.E-
rown of Vair Res. No.dffil/:'
Phone Nurnber: @
Town of VaiL Req. No. O+qq Phone Number: q% q4sffi
RECREATIO
CLEAN-UP
PERI'IIT /I
^ t APPLICATIoN MUST BE FILLED oUT COI'IPLETELY oR IT MAy NoT BE AccEpTED
X****************************'t PERMIT INFORMATfON *****************************rl
[$]-Building 1{1-elumbing ffJ-Electricar [ ]-Mechanibat [ ]-other
Job Nane:Job Addrer=, 3oo8 t..l.V-r^r,nt
Legal Description: Lot__.1_Block_ Filinq sTlRr,rTvrqrnN.
Address z "7tZ {oul s;. D(
Address:Architect: A/A
]t"z {occJ s; M ",,tdt ph.@_ffj
General Description : (:;_nrtl:- .,_,t_.-_ r r_ )
work class: [ ]-New [)K]-att"r.tion [ ]-Additional [ ]-Repair [ ]-other
Number of Dwelling Units:Nurnber of Accornrnodation Units:
TOTAL:
Address:
$nr"r
unu *Lno", of Fireplaces: Gas Appliances_ Gas Logs_ wood/pelret_
[*******
..###rqE*,J*fn***** *.e1y"y*r],oils *********************************
BUILDING: 9 i,ooo -ELECTRICAL:$ ?15-OTHER: $PLUMBING: $ i.eoo^r ELUMBT_NI: $ i. eoo^ MECHANfCAI, $:---V P?a - citco
^a, * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *.* * * * * * * CoNTRACTOR INFORI{ATION f Eeneral Contractor: Lrrc,-le.-ts-ilv O€_tr aJ
rtD. /.-rn nb,
VALUATION
Lr-ra,{it-^-:..CLEAN I'P DEPOSIT REFIND
?o >c-y
Pr-1 DAstr-^_:, lrJc -b,eo €.At^t-f , Co I 163 I
SEP-30-90 l{oN gr23
t UI,II N UF VHTL LUM-Ub.V
BURNING I.ITN CREDIT UNION INING l{TN CREDI
t11;:J':
13036250930 ,|l e!s8
P, 02
Np .001 P .01
fU,hHtr 0
03-479-2{52
FAX NO.
SEP ' - liGontoe-r E.{gte C $$rt l""ccOtlf.ftcc
[,ifi,3Jorl'"'*T9;ruJ4*, ]:_ Hf[ Xl$lrgffi lr wil,r e#:?i
Vrrlr ConEflUCIIgx rtt&lcrEIf, tDRt!
Arohlteatr Ad{Terrr Ph.r---a coneral Deacrlptlonr ,d(e\Zb fuJet ot ft/Ee Nf.c,rorr clasFi I J-NB' D4-ettanttar g l-rilitlfiar I 1:arparr I l-otnsr__iluilbcr ot D#erLlnE unlts; tH rft,obrr or aecanrodadrsn unrtrr ._r-i.
1}tutt antt TygB of ll,reFrrcegr Gqs rEPll,ano*---- oar _tagr_ r{ood/FelreE_
ff"**t*t***ti*l*'rr*t.**t*i****r.r. vrlr6trr*t L"?9*iPif*?**..rr..rr****rt*r.r****
Et u.rD$lc t I nr.!*rri?,tr,.. a gt -,-,., oo BUTLDII{GI |
-
Ercglnlcrl,:$2poeoo or,rrxnr I .$rr{BrNar lT recfiiEd;i-? rrilL: 3----v ,!fi il:i -ffi l;ilt#.t * l* *r*r* cil|rf,cilOe Bf rotrrarroN_l-1l r. :r!**r * r*r r* r. { * r * r * * *
nCAreri:-- -------- % [-osh ol Vdf n E. NO.Pheng l{|ttDrtt -_
EIa6tri.cal
AddrgEEt
Dlutrbing
Addrclci
Uechrnlcrl Contractoa:Addreaer
.r*4 *ffi tt*t***ra*ri****i*'rr..r*r tlm EurtDrxo runrir rrrr l$,,-llBll{(t pHfirT FEEr
--
llECli,AXtCAI, ?lRl,tIO fEEr EIEOITICTIT IE8:
8f,I%$rr o' rEEt
!!onn ol Urtl B.g. xo.
Dho.ng Nuuberr -
-"
OryIq::::::::::::::::f Ulgr*..r**rr*r***.ir*lr***i*rrrr*r
P+4Itr0 }IaI cHsqfi E88r
Torn o3 Ya1,1
Phcnn lttrnbcrt
noun of vall Dhonr llrubcrl
Y;;-8,
neg. lfo.
&EFitE.i'iLstff *;,,,llorif,Trep lrcr !r8tr-U! DllOsrrr aorl& 'ilrt tEsr
WILDfIOT
Eltiln$t'r$r
SOftlfOr tl0llllERlr
July 31, 1996
Town ofVail
Planning Dept.
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Remodel at 3008 S. Frontage Rd. (Man Residence)
Dan,
This letter is to senle as authorization for Kitchens by Design to proceed with the
remodeling of the kitchen at the Man Residence. Please do not hesitate to contact me if
you require anything firther.
Sincerely,
fr-fu €"a/'
Margaret Booth
President
*€,2{zl,z{
57'oc
lllo,g
7 ft ,7r
53,act Ltf n,4 D -/\) \'
r'r { ) ,Zt 1;>:r5;
r)i 7,J 5
;!.-.4-2./'\ o z' <--)
I
REFTT 1f, 1 TOlilN UF VAIt... COLORADO F,AGE 5
AREAI CD LA/e3/96 rZrT:rZrG REnUESTS FOR INSp'HnTION hIORK SHEETS FDR2IA/P,3/96
Activity: 896-OPl6 lfr/e3/96 Type: A-BUILD Status: ISSUED Constt': ADUF'
Aclclr.ess: StZtlZtB 5 FRUNTAGE RD b,EST
L.ocation: JOOB S. FRONTffGE RD
F,ar*e I : llVt3*154-tZr8-AOI
Descr-iption : REI''IODEL trF KITCHEN
Applieantr KIICHENS BY DESI6N' INC.
Owner': lvlARR SARAH A & CHARLES A
Contr-;rctor': KITCHENfii BY DESIGN' INC.
Occ: Llse: V N
Fhone: 389-lE7O
F'hone:
F,hone: 3t6-1E7tZt
Inspect ion Req r-test
Reqr-restor'r DONNA
Req Tiner OB:OO
Items r"ec{r"restpd to
U'4094 BLDG-Final
Information...
Comment s: END
be Inspected,,.
Fhone: 3E8-lE7?t
UNIT FAR WEST UNIT
. ficti on Eonnents,o 72 Titne Exp ,4 ./7yt/tos.*-o/-:{'/'---7/
I nsorct i on History...,,
OA51B cJri veway grade f inal
0AtAlra BLDG-Foot inas/$t ee I
laOAgA BLDE*Fo undat i on /5t e e I
O[t5eA F,LRN-ILtr Site Flan
O{t430 BLDG-Fr'am ing
frafr4@ * * Not on FiIe * *
otaetster BLDG-Insulat i on
O0q'6fl BLDU-Sheetrock Nai 1
laB/e3/96 Inspector: EG
0cln80 * * Not 0n File * *
AAfr?V ELDG-FIisc.
A7/31/96 Inspector': CF
OCtag'A BLDG-Final
lA/@E:/96 Inspector': CD
Item:
Item:
Item:
Item:
Item:
Item:
Item:It en :
Itemr
Itemr
Item:
Notes: ELEC AND FLUM$ING FINALS REG'D
Action: AF'FR
Act i on: AFFR
Act ion: DN
exept gar-age
APF,ROVED
DEN I ED
PROFERLY
Itemr 0A53rA Item: 4fi54'Z'
AI.L CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL REMOVED
HANDRAIL REO! D ON STAIRWRY
AIR6Atr ON DISHWASHER NOT INSTNLLET)
BLDG-Tenp. CIO
FLDG-Final trln
REpTlSl TOtfN tF UArL, COLIJRnDO
l0to3/96 O5:55 REeUESTS FOR INSPECTI0N ICORK SHEETS FOR:r0l 3t9A
PAGE
AREA: EG
?r
Activity:
Address r
Loeat i on :
Parcel:
Description:
Appl ieant :
Ewner:
Contractor:
E96-ge3S lot 3/96 Type:
3OOE S FRONTACE RD I.IEST
3606 S FRONTACE RD
e103-1S4-OB-GS1
ELEE REiIODEL OF KITCHEN
T.IESTERN CO. ELEC. CONTROL
IIARR SARAH A & CHARLES A
WESTEfiH CO. ELEC. CONTRTIL
B-ELEC Statur: ISSUED Constr: ASFR
Oee:Use:
spEc.
spEc.
Fhone: 97O-6e5-4413
Phone l
Fhone: 97O-6€5-4413
Inspeetion Request
Requestorr KEVIN
Req Tirer 68:S5 Iters requested to
OA19A ELEtr-Final
fnforration....
Correntsr LOCK
be Inspeeted...
Phoner 645-4413
BOX *KBD
Corrents Tire Exp
Inspection History... ..Iterr 06110 ELEC-Terp. Foser
Iter: OOl2g ELEC-Rough
Iterr 00136 ELEC-Conduit ',Iterl 6014O ELEC-ltlisc.
Iter: OOI9S ELEC-Final Iter: go,??4 FIRE-ALARI{ ROUEH
Iter: OO538 FIRE-FINf,L C/O
,/o.3.2a'
lo-t,gn Review Action r}n
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number
t
Project Name: '1 \
Building Name:
Project Description:
Owner. Address and Phone:
ArchitecVOontact, Addiess and Phone:
Zone District
-Board /Staff Action
Motion by:
Seconded by:
! Approval
E Disapproval
A Stalt Approval
Conditions:
Town Planner
i \ I ''Date. f \,.r r1 .t ,; | 1r/_. DRBFeepre-paid
)
o
EW BOARD
ll *-:
REVI
revlB.d 7/14/94
DESIGN
I
APPLICATION . TOWN OF
DATE RECETVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETTNG:!r*********
COLORADO
A c n I iri-.f HUU J I i!v'
!ir'
t
VAIL,
ttrt******!l I.
A.DESCRIPTION:
B. TYPE OF REVIEW:
c.
D.
E.
F.
Il .NAME OF OWNER (S )
Lo Lhis applicaLion.
ZONTNC:
NAME OF APPLTCANT:
Mai l ing Address; /4:
NAME OF APPLICANT'S Marling Addres s :
Phone
REPRESENTATTVE:
'
I6
Phone
OWNER (S .9rcrue"uRE
Mrilinn Address:
I.
J.
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED WITHOUT OWNER'S SIGNATTJRE
Condominium Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above,\ are Lo be paid at, the Lime of submiLLat.of. the DRB applilarion. -r,iier, ,nen apprying -for a buirding permic,^prease i-aentiiv-lh. u..rru..valuation of Lhe proposal . The iown of vail wi1l adjust the
f:.-i::ording co Lhe Lable betow, ro ensure t.he correct fee r}) Pcrltl t
.t" "oto' *'ir,rtD ."""* 0,4;,3 oor",r(, lr1 / "",fiiVir,,t
q ?(p_._
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATION
4: ^ a in y v * .r,C00 $ 10,001 - $ s0,000 $50.001 -$ 150,000
$1s0,001 - $ s00,000 $500,001 91,000,000 $ Over $1,000,000
$ 20.00
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$400.00
$s00.00
DESfGN RE'TEI'' BOARD AppRovArJ ExprREs oNE YEAR AFTER FrNAr_,APPROVAL UNIJESS A BUTLDTNG pERMrr rs rssuED er.ro cowsrRucrroN IS STARTED.
New ConsrrucLigl. ($200.00) _X_Minor Alrerarion ($20.00)Addition ($50.00) ' _Conceprual Rewiew (g0)
ADDRESS , 2448 4 E*,XtZt6e FP i^/
LEGAL DESCRIPTI
Subdivision
If property is described bv descripcion. please providL a meets and bounds on a separate sheet
legaI
and att.ach
:--r.*.ft
II.
ITI
A pre-applicat-ion meet.inq with a member of t.he planning sBaff is encouraged t.o determine if any additional application information is needed. It is Ehe applicanc,s responsibilicy to make an appoinEment with rhe llaff to det.ermine if there are additionaL submit.tar reguiremencs.Please note that a coMpLETE application will sireamline the review process for your project.
In addit.ion Lo meeting.submittal reguirements, the applicant musL scake and Eape the projecC sit.e t.o indj.cat.e properry lines, bui_Iding fines and bui.lding corners. All E.rees Lo be removed must, be Laped. All site tapings and sEaking must. be completed piior to the DRB site visit. The applicanE. must. ensure thae st.akinq done during the winter is not. buried by snow.
The review process for NEW BUIIJDfNGS normally requires Lwo separate meetings of Lhe Design Review Boardi a concepeual review and a final review.
ApplicanLs who fail to appear before the Design Review Board on Lheir scheduled meeting date and who have noE.asked in advance Lhat. discussion on their iLem be postponed, wil] have Lheir items removed from Lhe DRB agenda unt.il such time as Lhe iLem has been republished.
The following iLems may, aE Lhe discreLion of the zoning adminisLraLor. be approved by the CommuniLy DevelopmenL DeparLmeriE sLaff (i.e. a formal hearino before Lhe DRB may not. be required) :
a. Windows, skylighLs and similar exferior chanqes which do nor alter the exisLing plane of Lhe buildinq; and
b. Building addirions-not visible from any oEher 1ot.or public space. AL the time such a proposal is submitted, applicants musL include letteis from adjacent property owners and/or from the aqent for or manager of any adjacent condominium association staLing Lhe association approves of the addiCion.
If a property is l_ocaLed in a mapped hazard area (i.e.snow avalanche, rockfall_, flood plain, debris f1ow,wet.land, etc. ) , a hazard s Ludy must be submit,t.ed and t.he owner musL si.gn an affidavit recognizing the hazard reporE prior to the issuance of a building permit.ApplicanLs are encouraged to check with a-f-own planner prior to DRB applj.cation to determine Ehe relationship of the property Lo all mapped hazards.
For all residential construcLion:
a. Clearly indicaLe on the floor plans Ehe inside face of Lhe ext.erior sLrucLural walls of the building; and
b. Indicate with a dashed line on the site plan a four foot disLance from the exLerior face of the building walls or supporLing columns.
If DRB approves the application wiE,h conditions or modifications, a1l conditions of approval must be addressed prior ro the applj.cation for a building permi t .
D.
Fritzlen Pierce Briner
1650 E. Vail Vallev Drive C-l Vail Colorado 81657 TEL970-476 6342 FAX97A 476 4qAI
luly 3O, 1996
Fritzlen Pierce Residence-Proposed Repainting
2998 S. Frontage Road Wcst, Vail Colorado
Proposed Paint Color:
Moonvood 08065 "Bark"
Areas to be repainted:
Roof Fascia, Window Trirn,
Deck Rails and Verticals, Exterior
Doors
Garage Door to be sanded and
clear seal to finish
I
jrU JSERS\LFU99li\-o(n'>AINT. WPD
ln+l , 95' l4r,rrunnna o
II
--
@ m Iq
1-O t-, h .E l<x f t! )z I fm: i3 l9q 3 l:; o lJ+t,i.: ; o 14, in o t<{I l-: m =r-! 2 I=
o<
d8 a!uio clt >l 7E ii:o _n
!m
=
=pF
1==gE"
t-
NEE
t]n!
o o z
CN {n
o {o z
!m F
={
dP
z=
2=oo z
q,z
=q mt
t,I F!, I
lht O 140 ts r tE<lAo l'n
-@l m
9<s' -t
-{o
@ mr x m T
-.1
o z
L o
@
2,-{m
o
2 o z --l n
o -l o
9p ic
EE
de
2"-{m nz >m o!i>o'-n
?
=m o i
(--
2
m
li |o l{
12 lo
l'n I<t>l-
lfl lz
l-rt t<l>
lF l!lm
lp lz
lJ rn totr t€F tzl t^ t,
EE tzF [- Fn
IBP
laH t|.-ttl IF
l.ol
l'i"l lr{ |tl
5.
I 5.u)
ldE
t6E
EE t: t-,tf,6 @E trn
t6E
l.., F lrr
l-l rl
:FII
<ts r.>p k -F Z rEts wl @l rt F. l W o'l F utl H @l N tF-trq r&f ?r I o' tln I Kf I r.o I I tl tl
FF trF bp t0K wz VF tJH lo td toF poH IN in ti IE rtra Fdl ol EI tsl F)I FI FI pl
H13
l'll l<t>
lF
lm
le,lz
le
I
I
I
I
I
t tl
TJ E
E
F
T
iHsa - ogd
i6*.?
;q ii
=:!F *=H€. dp-+
5 f;:
5i5g
H a3:O^.sr:
+aFl (o9=(/t
ae4{
-E qtD
il"3-; il
d: le f_o o *@3==
ue4 &
i=g3 @3oL
I =X =e;f=
ss;q <o-=
E:d. P o'
Yfcj
; i B*
Su a'5 .,ER6
fraiE
!-<
EY
trp FOO
SP
G_v).-
o3
(D
g.
='(o
o
o
A)
o
\'o
s qt
n \l
G (r
k
c
m
o _rl
=o
m r 'n
z
-{T
m
€2
m !
,(/,:z I
z
r-
T
m
=(t
z
m
m
m
l<'
12
lz
t>lr-
-.t o<'r 'It
m
m t-m o
al
m
€
t-t-a
z o
r-
+
z
-l I
:z
m
U'
a
r t-c
m
I
m
o I -i .
J
z p
l
m !t-
m a
0 €m
=z o c z
t
o o
0
-l
z c z -
I
z m {
--t
rrt
l
=z
x
t
0
=z
t-
m !I
-i
m
o
a
_n
I
^2
c)NF m^; EJ tljrri F to F>'n
=2ct A 29 i oO Io d !
^e c h zq---t oo o 'nzz
5
x
^)@=Sm=
n<
lF IF
lo IE lFr
{
a
-l
vl r?ll
7l 'l
I
I
I
c)
rg
t-
F z c)
z
{
z H
€
H z
H
H
{F
z
t:t-
IF
l-t-
17
t-tf
t7
It lrt
t>
IF t;IF
t:IA
l-IF
:J
tZ
lz
,o F
i@ ic lr
,'z
io lz
iq
m t9
ZH
=F =F 9P r,t Z'Pr) or,iF eF zz lA ; E OtE,
=H ;7{iF -l
O' I "tl
r'tv l.)rl I tr ro Ao F- ls''
ll 'gl El 3r -rr
.l o
-!
l-.It
m n
=
='Tt
m m (!,
t.
F
()
t-
(n
m
x
o f'm
z
m
L
m
z
m
m {
@
m
m I
F z
'n m m
=m o I
z o
|-
T
=
m
m {
6
!
z
m o x
|-
2
m T
=-{
m
=-{
'Tl
m m o
VALUATION
!m F
=
=2 o
3 m
2 o
t-
t-
3
@ z
m t-m o {a o
t-
t-I 2
lv
(
ii 5
)
ur l5 olN btb oto
/flor< e/t la4r
a O o ro'oN oF vArr coNsrRucto o
N
PERMTT APPLICATION FORM oerr: iRt0'tl rrB J tggd
{e
PERMIT
q.
Legal Descrlptiont tnt-?}....Block_! FLILngt suBprvrsroNt /*TE?H T
t,Owners Nane: L-'it Address: 2 Ph.
tl) c'.-T
#u_5ffi
, APPLTCATTON MUST BE FTLLED OUT COMPLETELy OR IT DlAy NOT BE ACCEPTED
I* *****rl*!t***** *** *** *** ***t*** PERMIT fNFORI,IATION *****t* **********************fl , ./
!(I-Building [D--Plunbing [ ]-Electrlcat [ ]-Mechanlcal [ ]-other L'<-j.l -,J6b Nane: ? l' (-1.t,,4 'uc€ ,tob Addre*s.zqtfr 4 ,rrrt.,*a.n: pD..il
Architect:Address: llcB .:
Work Class: [ ]-New ffi-Alteration I l-Additlonal [ ]-Repair [ ]-Other
Number of Dwelllng Units: 4-
e]n. q 7a -Lfr|,
Nurober of, Accotruoodation Units: O
Electrical Contractor:
Address:
Town of Vail Reg. NO.
Phone Number:
Town of Vall Reg. NO.
Phone Number:
Town of Vail Reg. NO.
PhOne liftrrnlrgl;
Plunbing contractor:
Address:
Mechanical Contractor:
Address:
**********r******************t** FoR orFrc8 usE ******************************r (i 5-BUTLDING PI.AN CTIECK FEE:
PLI'T'IBTNG PIAN CHECK FEE:
I-TECTTNIICAL PI.A}I CHECK FEE:
RECREATTON FEE:
BUILDTNG PERMIT FEE!
PLI,ITIBINC PERMIT FEE:
I'fECHANTCAL PERMIT FEE:
EI,ECTRICAL FEE:
OTHER TYPE OF FEE:
DRB FEE:
G2uP
Col,0cr,EN[-uP DEposrT :
4o"" ToTAt PERUIT FEES:
T
BUTLDING:
SIGNATURE:
ZCNINGi
SIGNATT'RE!
Cornments:
VALUATION
$tirf "rrPi"r."ntir..!February 2' 1994 ARcHrrEcruRE pLANNTNG rNrERroRs
Dept. of Community Development Vail Colorado 81658
RE: 2998 South Frontage Rd. West VaiI Colorado Bill Pierce and Lynn Fritzlen Residence
We would like to add a window, drywall and add heat and electrical to an area of our home that is currently be-ing used as storage. The space is 8, high and would be considered GRFA. I have prepared a GRFA analysis for the residence for your records .
The window is not visible from any adJoining property f am assuming that this proposal- would be staffed proved.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Thanks, Llmn
LIONSRIDGE LOOP VAIL COLORADO 81658
nti(t firl:rtNrNC or^nmttN nti(t sftMr
so
aP-
Pg. 1
POST OFFICE BOX 57 lOOO 3Q3 416 6342 FAX 303476 4901
I
rNslnoN REeuEsr 58?TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
-l 'z t(.-';
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION:
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNOATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING
D INSULATION D POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
n
U
drtrunl tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
TI
tr SUPPLY AIR
D-
tr FINAL tr FINAL
{
f{paoveo
)ORRECTIONS:
E DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
PERMIT NUMBER
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
PROJECT
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES WED THUR
OF
AM
1
PM FRI
llrsfcnoN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
N UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
D ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FBAMING
n ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
D SHEETROCK NAIL tr
o tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
tr
E
tr
ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
D._
tr FINAL tr FINAL
.8. APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
,*rt"roN REeu
I
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138 PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE rir'l
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JO8 NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI PM AM
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
O FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
D UNDERGROUND
O ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
ON / STEEL
r-r ROOF & SHEER - PLYWOOD NAILING D GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
-
tr POOL / H. TUB
O SHEETROCK NAIL
F1
O FINAL
o
o
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
,;D CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
utr
tr FINAL D FINAL
,pi,APPRovED
GORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED D BEINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
t t
/)/(-, //t' , /v' +"/ cl ,
t
.],lEr.
I
/ 1e4 -/,.7 i !./ /
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
/ / / / /,./DATE JOB NAME
READY FOR INSPECTION:MON
rrustcnoN REeuESr
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
l.ra
LOCATION:
r(? -z:irl'art/o,
/-4r {
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATER E FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER ' PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
fr rr.rsuurtor.r tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETFOCK NAIL
O FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRlCAL:
D TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
D ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
D FINAL D FINAL
F
Cr
ROVED
RRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR 4r, ..../' (,'
,,i,
IU ii,t;i'* *io
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
.r'7
/, /^
'' (
PERMIT NU OF PR ItraT
t' JoB NAME
BEF
'il,
WED THUR
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
CALLER
MON TUES M
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
D FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W-V.
O ROUGH / WATER tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
D INSULATION D POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
D FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
O EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
N FINAL tr FINAL
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
,*t"toN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138 PERMI
DATE
T NUMBER OF PROJECT
JOB NAME
CALLER
READY FOR INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI AM PM
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / S
tr FOUNDATION
tr FRAMING
-n ROOF & SHEE " PLYWOOD NA
D INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr_
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWEf
tr ROUGH
-D CONDUIT
-tr_
tr FINAL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATER
D GAS PIPING
O POOL / H, TUB
D
!
D
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
O EXHAUST HOODS
O SUPPLY AIR
D
tr
TEEL
/ STE
h
ILING
NAIL
ER
EL
FINAL
FINAL
tr APPROVED
I
CORRECTIONS:
D DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
ts.
--I .Dl
-t
m Ia LO i-E l-.i o
>ll :6 .\5 x-YO
Po ho -rI t3 ac f=
o.<
6P ;;g iDO
>i z6
'Tl
!
m
=
fr{t '9e mo l+
i= ls
E' lfi
l=T!tr
Or-
z=
:=o--z
+
0z
=q mil
l,- r l>l 17o lFo lr! !l<<l-o t- 'tl
tl
=m :n F<
-{
-{
@ m x
m
-t
z (-o
(D
2 i
m
@ o)
o o z (n
{F c o {o z
!
$i
o
2t1
AT
R=z'A
*i 6z 1'r,XP
Oa z. l-
--.t c p<
de
4;
5.1
-{o o>
o
9.n -lm uz >m of,t --t >
n
_r
=m
-{
o {z
m
b
z
3
T
P
fu
r-
m
f-5<)m
-{>4z lo J>
-n T-
t-Y zl "I'
E-I
El'EI:
t)
I m t-m
t6 l{z
o I t>
;
$
z o
I
€z
n
t-
m
9)z
l-{
l€
t;l<l>
lF
lm
lo I'lz
m t-
m
t!
I
o\
Ln
oF {F zl ol TI qJ
;H
r-*m-l oA,''Y zJ,
Y*r
e1 ;{r. rN \ofr OFfi t(D rEl
I
I
I
l{
l€
lz
l9
l<t>l-
l*
=
I
'tl =E >D FB >lo OI 9l>m lr-:t alF (, t/-\
lfd (,lo
r.J l(/)
frl I.)
vt l2d !l|!Fll
I al EI
I
I
I
I
a
--{
z
z
N
|\J
I
;E: d
ja*-€
6'g Ie
Y =o, O :.<ot ar 3 a +3il.o ;.-6(D
(,o=J
c f *-
fY=-
;=.5E
^, =.o
o
=^l-
ci= o -5 *ct f to9*@ *O K o)o*=!
-E o!i 9) -;'*_f +i;
;6'9. o {oa-r r_o ci *(/,3l=
EE4E ir9P
di! a
g
"tq;s3;il
<o-f
s:aP A
r 6
=.^j 8a&i *u a =.'3gQ
*ot:::(,o=.
o
s.o {
o
o t f.
o
3
@ g.
='(o
o o
o
o
=o
!o
't!o
=a
m t-n
z
{T
m
€z m
z o
I!
9)a z o =z
-.D
m
=a z m m
m
l<
lz
lz
t>lr-
lH T-
I
I
I
z a c t->i
z
-i
m
-l I
z
@
f)
c
m
tr€
ri-
-z ..4
z .
z>9R rd ,<,..j.1 <
>o
ni coo z c I
--l
IL tl tl tl
z rn
€
-t rn
--t
z
o g
--.1
o z
:
m -9
F X
--t
-t
m
c
6-)tl
I
|-
I
z
H
P
I
$'
c)NrP
2x2 m:fri {-m F to nla *za)itQo o'<z vAqr.
f o 6 f
^Z c:
za,od o 'nzz {
x
I<
=
H
t-
o
E
3'
trt r!
rJ
rq z
Eq
I
rI]
n
H
Fl
F z
E rlj
^N
2>_
z6
Qn
t-Zo tttz
r4c)?z -,o
oui
*i rdl
I FI HI
Fdl
HI FI
f4l
I Fdl
FI rl
I
z
z
=z 6 --l
--l m
g
t-
z 6 o 'T!3
;|-
-t m
n z
t-F
N t-
rq
x X
F<H X F 11
I
I
ul
-l o -t
t-'o
m
=-Tl
m m (r,
{H r t-
c)P -r
c
U'
m
-{
x
tn
z c !
m !
g
--t
m L
z
m
=m
=
m
m
-l
z 'n
m m
m
I
z
t-
t-c
=q)
z
m t-m
--t
o
z o -m o x
c
t-
2
m
=
m
=
='Tt
m m a
VALUATION
!m
.=
-l
z
9
I
I t-
li
3 m
I
2
^
c
-
m
m
-{
o
G
F
z
t,s'tv
o o
v+r')vwI
tlqlas' {h
Legal Description: Lot J Block
Architect:
Address:
Plunbing Contractor:
Address:
Mechanical Contractor:
Address:
FiItng
?)€ ,lA s'r p rlryP5.t"":
Ph.
Address:
Address:
Nurnber of Dwelling Units: I
^ ryFrflber and Type of FirepJ.aces: Gas v
/f**'r* * * *!r* * * ********** ** * ** *******
BUfLDING: $
PLIIMBTNG:
I***************************
'I t Eeneral Contractor:
GeneraL Descriptio"t
work crass: [ ]-New [ ]-Alteration [ ]-Additionar (1-nepair 1 l-other
Number of Accommodation Units:
cas Logs_ Wood/pellet Appliances
VALUATTONS *********************************
ELECTRTCAI, g 2:CO
OTIIER: $
MECHANTCAL: $
Reg. NO.
********************************FOR oFFrcE usE *************** * ***************BUTLDING PERMIT FEE:
PLT'MBING PERMIT FEE:
MECHANICAL PER}TIT FEE:
ELECTRICAL FEE:
oTHER TypE oF FEnzi/CIJAN-UP DEPOSTT:
TOTAL PERI.TIT FEES:
BUTLDTNG:
STGNATTIRE:
ZONING:
STGNATT]RE:
BUTLDTNG PIAN CHECK FEE:
PUJ}.TBING PIAN CHECK FEE:
MECHANTCAL PI,AN CHECK FEE:
RECREATTON FEE:
TOTAL:
CoNTRACTOR INFORMATION ** * * ** * * * * * * * * * ** * * * *** * ***
Town of Vail Req. No.Phone Nunber:
Town of vail Reg. No. rc7-y'Phone Nunber: *;,, -..€
Town of Vail
Phone Nunher3
Town of Vail
Phone Nuruber:
Reg. No.
CI.EAIT IlP DEPOSIT BEPT'NI' TO:
VALUATTON
Y.r
TOWN OF VA]L, COLORADO Statemnt
************************************************ir***************
Statemnt Number: REC-0002 Amount:45.00 fi/0s/95 0e:54
Permit No: 895-0004 Type: B-ELEC EL,,ECTRICAL PERMIT
Location: 3OOO FRONTAGE ROAD
Payment Method:Notation: TT ENTERED Init:*** *************************************************************
Account Code
01 0000 41313
01 0000 47336
Description
ELECTR]CAL PERMIT FEES
WILI. CALI., TNSPECTTON FEE
Total (This Payment):
Total Fees:
Total AII Payments:
Balance:
45.00
45.00
.00
Paid
42.00
3.00
4s .00
t t INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138 PERMIT NUMAER OF PROJECT
DATE I
READY FOR INSPECTION:
a
;JO8 NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI AM PM
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMEING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER O FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETFOCK NAIL fI
tr tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
D TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
D tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
-INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138 i
T NUME}ER OF PROJECT PERMI
QATE
,
JOB NAME
CALLER
READY FOB INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI AM PM
LOCATION:
EUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
D FOUNDATION / STEEL
D UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
D ROUGH / WATER O FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION O POOL / H, TUB
D SHEETROCK NAIL tr
E D
tr FINAL tr FINAL
EL
B
tr
tr
o
EGTRICAL:
TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT O SUPPLY AIR
tr
B FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE .INSPECTOR
I
-INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
PERMTT NUMqER OF PROJECT
DATE +JOB NAME
CALLEB
READY FOR INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI
479-2138
AM PM
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
O ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER O FRAMING
rr ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING E GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION D POOL / H. TUB
O SHEETROCK NAIL n
tr fl
O FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRlCAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
D CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
tr tr
tr FINAL D FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
O DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE
I rNstcroN REouESr
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138 PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT ,,
' : :|l DATE ,,' ,J JOB NAME
INSPECTION:
c{rLn.,_,
MoN T!Frs'l59 THUR FRI READY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
O ROUGH / D.W.V.
D ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
,_ ROOF & SHEER
" PLYWooD NAIL|NG tr GAS PIPING
O INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
o
tr FINAL O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
E HEATING
O ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr tr
tr FINAL D FINAL
E] APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
-o
v
o
[\op(lty & nental }vlmagenrrcrt Cn.
ilune 16 ' 1993
Errigt Galtzle
REr 3OOO South Fro$tlgc Rd. Electrieal Work
De{r Erus L r
Juct tu ulrilaLe yoll on the pf,ogrc$c for the above addreee'
At lass we spohel I was trying to obtoin Copher Exce'v*tin6
to update cha bid fr:rr Lhe worh. They would noveB call
me biclt. therefote, r have E&B Excavating giving rne a
bid anCt neetlng witlr DrruLrle oianond Electric on the eite'
pan trom SeB l; gettilrg rne a bid. Fcel free to call hiq
it you like to lnsure we tt-te dtling what we catr go gcL
the proceilure Xn motlon.
I wiII let, you know when we lrave daues 6et. Thahk you
for your patrence.
Deanna Turner
143 E. Merdow Drive Suite 499 Vall, Cnlnrado 81657
(303) 47614400 Frx (309)4794036
aod 610 AI-]Y3d Hdd 9806 6lb E0E B0:ets 86./['Nnc
w D€anna
Learl.ng
DLT/slb
I{opefty& Itatal Irtlanagarutt Co,
May 25, 1993
Ernst Galtzle
Tpvrr qrf Vall
75 $o, Frentage Road Vall, CO 6L667
RE: SOOO 8cr. Fronl"age Rood
Dear Erntti
[,gr our phona dlacusalon, w€ are tlxr rrew nonagorrr for 3OO0 5o.
Ff,ontage Road. I Juet last mek Iearned of the problen regardlng
the el€crrlcal wof,tr ne€dlng to b3 done Et the property.
I an ln tne pro€ess ot @ntractlng an 3agavator 6nd sleotrlrilarl.
I havE rec€lv€al Doubr€ Dlrnond's bld snd am 3t11l salttng for
Gophar Ercavatlon'e bt(l. I then need the o*nar'l a;4trorral, whlch I'n aure won't be a proDle[, andl nlrenevgr tno ccrntractgr'D arB
avallable, we wlll etart th6 proceas.
PleaEa know we are dolrrg everyEhlng as qutckty as posalble. If you
havG any gu:rtlons, please contaat ne.
Thank you for your cooperatlon.
Turnor
litanagor
143 E. Meedow Drive Suite 499 Vdf Colorrdo 81657
(909){76{4m Frx (303) 4I|},9MG
E0d b00 A!-'1V38 l.'ltd 9806 6lb E0E 90:E ES,9Z'AYl.l
o o z
@ {7 c
c)
=o z
T rn fr
={
I
TD
m Iq :-- o
li il at l<x f t.It Y :lm: 6 lon !f; x ..
l'ui S lmP "'lamO l< -r =l'r. a 3 ac T'
o<
::t (D (J<69 60
>t z6
m,+
_n -m
:
Tlr lr I
l.J__(,!.i!
cl' \J r-
z<F Fr r"r
FX=ooo
3z H z
F
F
fffir et
-
C-<trq
2==
YP
T-
o
Z a'\
an
3
m
'T-
z
o
z i
--t
2;ic
3=
A=
z=--{ x
.P;
-.{ o o>
2n --{ m nz >m
-t>
c)I
-t m
i -fl
t-z
F
F l.tz IH
IF t<
tz
IH t>
lFr tz
ll|
z
IT
E D
F
F
El cr
H p.
D
{2 m
+ t-r mlO
=t€'lz
lo ll l>IF t-
lfr
19,
lz
lo
I
I
I
I
l-t lo l{
lz lo
t:t>
IF
l*
19,
l=
l{lo
l€
lz lo
t:l>l-
lB lz
:!
F
F 3
z
l-r
l{
lz
In t<t>
l-
tm
le,lz
t:
la.II
t-
.F.
.-J
I
i.J !
l.J
l-r lo
l€
lz lo
t:l>t-lr
lF lz
=
m
=
!a
q,z
-{:m "'l
m
HI z'
z=
21 O a'r <;
l..J !
*3 Pi
m x m
-
z
I -m
)a
b z LJ V'
?ro o -r ;d30 - OE /'i
3 6'g.E o-X^,d!ii
Y =or o :-<l{o-{iP
45siro*i *6'o
(,oYf T -.o o)cf*-
:r3ll o;- <
-.iqlo Hol:
dfo)
=.r-=: (v
=.(og+(/'
*O^1 qt o-=15 *EoE -=-=--f+i;
;'a 1. 3'i r ^LF (/)3:=
^,?.!5(D ;i =at o :'< a.i =.: E
: =< =s .= L ,1. =
95 o 6
= tt _.<o-l A:o=
JO)=J a:f3.
o)X;i
(,$o-1
^:99 ):@o=
o
6'
€
o
"o-c :
3
E,
5 (o
(D
q)
o-
=o
... f'
\x
L:..\ \):
o
J o
i
{l
=o
o-
=o
o
-n
o
€z
m
I
a m t-n
m
m
o
-D
t I z o
-
(,:z o
X
o
_-r o z
r-
!
m
=-.1 (t)
z m
m
m
r-1
iz
t=
i=
lr
ln J
o c -l
t-
fx-
t-
o -
!
€o o o
I
m
--l
--l c<n_o m
p
m l'
I
I t-
l
il
:.
€
I
z
z
I
i rd
ll)
+--i
l
z a c t-
-l
o z
--{
T
o
z
m
|,
c
m
no qt
CF
-
z>
10 I<'..u <
>o o>
m @o z c
4
z
m
=
-l m 4
-l
z
b<*
o I
_j
2
:
I
_0
z -i
.o
m
o
o
I
c
-i
z
?G]F <l
H1
El
F]t!l
EI
:l zl
(.')l
>t FI
EI
n
€
z
x €
z
FI H c.
z
d
Nt'
o:
c'!O
ZO
6ul
o z
,<
I
z
z";ez
[!l m
aui zo
-u)=
rlr o FZ 4a
9=r"o
cEx
FI zl fdl
H
E
T
Fi*f-
z z
F
g
t-
=z
{
m
U'
z .
2 6
-.t
m
Zol \JZ'
i'+l 26t z;,
FI
I
I
I
I
I
I
;l
I
I
I
I
I
z ,I
a\:
-l
\l :
4
v
-{
t-
m
=-Tt
m m
U)
c a m
?c
m
2
m q
z
m
m €
@
o
o
rn
--l
z 'n
m m
m o
z
o
c
@
z o
tTl
m
-.t
;
z o I
o x
c
z
m
i
m
='Tl
m
m (n
VALUATION
m
=
=z o
3 r'l
c)
2 =
2
m
m
6
:c
2 o
a
c(-stag4
trlzs I'q t 3fu-
tit
-:rF>.
Et // \\
=t{/ , \
=W, I
€/
9z
i'a ati -l 'm
I lFr I lz l.- Q tz4
lFi
-n
NJT O\m
F<
t!
m x
m
-1
z (-
G'(h f
m
'z
t-F z
^ C/)
O ('l
O -o
o o z
CN {F c o
-{o z
!lrl
ro 3
{
-l
m
Iq !-o
--r=o <x f
m\=YR'-
-> o qP o 4;lno <-r I
'k I
o<IA
o:E ;9 -6O
ctl >t =^4
.r1
!
m It
+
r-rr-rrX
L,-IL JIt{
<gP
!, >
T-
t lt-lrt
x d;
z<
>=
4Z
7
o Za\
4a >;n
R<z';
g>az --.r ^Y>
z;ic
3=o=l2 Oc)
*
=;>;
-to o>
9n
nZ >m
-t>or-
o -
=m
--t
€z m
(-!
z
=m
c)
z F tr{
I
c)n
X H
z
z
It= r
lu ui lo >
I
|.x
I
.Y,|
=z
rr
H z
DA H
p
E
z
F
z
+m t-
m
--.1
€z
_n
I t-
m
z
E lo
t;
t-
m
9)
2
3
€z
o I
-
B i
!
3
I o {z
_rl
t-
m
z
+..{
I 5
u.)
H
E
t-{
-t o €z
_n
I t-
m
i
F F tr F
I
-
I 4 E t<
l;IF l>
lz IE
lc)
iz t>
I'
I
9 .-l
z
ln
o
_0
qro-(OO-T
aa:
ru :1 (D
-og rr i'<
x g?
f:-
-P{{Eo
+ts3
-6'o J--
o:1 f
=+-
r56 ;- <
i oo
f,o)
o*A'
o o!
Y -o i +o)*'" ;
o -* --
3t="rt :l o
-:3 o
{9P
ordr =5.F :t*=vX*ts=jqto
lci
=:6 -x-'6aJ
Dto:a9x od5.qr:io
(D --*
A'{v
o,l
g.
o
J
6'
c
c
o
o)
='(o
J o
-1
t )
N
:.
l
s.
vr.
o l
o
o o
o
vr.
f
o
o
€
It
o
c
I.
3
g.
=(o
o
0)l o-
J o
o
u
o
f o
o
z
-.t
o -.t
n
.I
a
m r
T1
z
-.t I
m
€z m
o m
o
t--
ix
I
I
I
I
!
2 o
i
I
l_
T-
X
-1--
I
I
@
:z o
X
t_
t@,
19 o
I rr -'l
l>lr
m
-i
a tfi rm
-.F L-
v,z I
-f
',I l:l>t.
lfro<
F-*
I
l- m lPi;l>ro b
fu<,T+
W,Z o)4 :r
i
i
z o c -
--l
o z
-o
--l r i
n
l i
F
m
IO T:OI
-z ZA
z
=
z>oo
!<+<
>o
mi (,o
z c
a
i
i
l
z
€
--t m
z
+<x
o
i o z
AJ m !
-i
-o
m
c !
o
I
c
_l
z
5
r4
rq
H
*c)N)H 'xT o --r Hf,O*f.tr ! ri zz:.1 \J->.rl Xzo Fli' Q O >(o<z F-{I A Ur.3I" 3 i rjo< E b Zz .t oooo .'nzz 9t
r.!r AA
N@=
ror
n<
B
€
I
H
z
H
i-
-
z
--.1
-+
:J
--t z
:A
3 I -l
a
z
z o
F
z
z
m
=z o
=z 6 i
--l
c a-
t:.! 2 lro k9
K5
ii>r
(n
o l\, >
\o ,.o
ts z
H
z
a
tt
a.J
\o
-{
--l
t-
m
="'t
-n
fTt m u)
c a m
-t >4
I i
rn
z
m
m {
(D
n
m o
--l
z
3
o :
z o
!
c
q z
m o --t
o
z o I
o x
c
z
m
=
m
=-n
m m (n
VALUATION
m
=
=z o
3 m
I
z o r
c
=
=
m |-m
3
t-
c
z
tJ t^)
(Ed/ J',Oyl .-\4
Y/trr
rl
-fl,
=rP.\=il1,\=)A/1> |x')/
o o z o {7 F L ()
{
6 z
!
-t Fl -lF ;t=trl el {
o o m FT gI ci o:
=9.Ig i:x=.6g 3r a9 F!H1 I !m !3
!tn o
!m E
=-t
L]ts.
m@
m=
96
2,=oo
n
=m o -
z
o
tr Dtr
EE 2=(f@
3;z
o o 1o E+
9ii o !
c 2
I t c
c
3 m o
z
(.)
o
9p
*E
de
F 9F
=8 =-a 6t d9 ,?
o
-C,-m ,z >m oa -{D oF t
,o
=tn o
o €z m t
I
b
@ 2
=!T
\
F-
s
N
s
rb
)t
.l
,
etr trm .iO o>.r
f.i'
?.
t-o
^
@
I
e z o
[s.
t:
N
l*{
N
'-l
F
!n
+J r
.L
r,l u F
-l tct It
lz o Irt k t>
Ht
lo t'
FI
hd
Iti t
bJF l/'
t2 l3
ts
It
Itc ttl I|\l!
p
F
IN
H
le.
ril
o {z
o .lt
t m
P z I
!t
=
2 :o {2
o .|t
t
!It o
2 o
!!
E
o {2
o .tl
!-t |n
P
2 I
rt t I
o
I
3 D
a
n
t -
o
t'
fr N
0
E.
,u
b$,
c.u c\l,ti
F
EE
HF
I sl-\
I il$,
It nlo{
l\ilt
t$l
t$
ct
m
z o
m
I
o o !
o .rl
!m a 3
o
@ ,n x m !-t
o z
o
@
2,
n
o 0 {
6 z
!tn t
3
6 z n m o ttl o l<.'
12
ta
l-l It lF
{
o
^2 n
.-
|l!
6)tur
IE E8 IE as vt c, o
r= : e 3 d3 t - ;\n z z
>*t s''l
lll Hiii
lllffiiiii
"d-iigg
!m a
=.|l
nl m (t,
t 7
=z o
o o z (n
{n c o {o z -u
rn F
={
e
-
E
m Io.:-- a!;t --.{ ;; O'<X f
o 6n=iX != g
=;o ,{J in O <-r I
-{F='< e
o.<
:o (J<
-(D -aO
>I 16 () 3
.n
-0
m t
=
r - a--r r>!l t _X
<tr8
;=Y z=Z
YF
l-
t lL lt I (^) --o ,:.1 l:o u'_o\ Cq z<f,n -r rrr ,4 22
4 =\)zz
F
P
o
Z .',t
>;
m
I
z
o
z
--l
z;--.t c T3
-z Ltc)
..: m
>;
io o>
o 2"-lm nz >m
--{ >
o -r
;m
-.t 'T!
I z
F ts
l-IF tz l€IFn F B
a d P
a
z
3
T
€
rf'
I
f4
n
rlr
?(
rlr z
z
oE
=F *F .t>rt lo i:n Fr zlv SB
FI l\o t5.l^
t-
IF IH
* lH o |'d \o |'d Fl
o' lF \o loa
ol
r m o
f-
()|<
=t>-<F
D
F
I
=l
I
I
-.t tl mlO El€:tz
lo
ll t>l-lr tfi
lo lz
l"
I
I
I
I
I
i{lo
I€lz lo
l-n t<
t=lr
l8
l+
lo
l=
lz
p
l>
lF t,lm
lF,lz
l-.t lo
l€
lz lo
IT t>
lF li
ls
lz
I
=
14
Fll
H
F.3
FU
t--r-
€z.-\
YA
< r-l >.-r
r-E
mcp
.H zn
(t
I
F'!
I F.u)(,
z
...'|
m
I
o n
"Tl
!m
--{
-{
m
x
m n {
z
(D I
--l
m
I
m
P{a
z
rrr
tz
r
z LJ TJ)O
f 1-l
(-f
.-o
N)
(O O -,r ;r6 \u!ao no o \J i'<.\X^.
^
*:
l:x
.<P€
{E6-+08
-o (u
f-*oYl
=**o:a i56 i- <
;l-
:9-
o*6'
t=!
! o!ii==
.r + ir;7-d:.o
r=o
-=9o €9P
olar ==.--lo=.\o
54=iqro g,
-,
== a ::.f i:5 ;x=.
ija3
ERd
(,(D=.
D-O
{I
g.
z.a
c o
c
(D
OJ o o
;
f o
-l
€
@-
N
:
q
J
(D
?
o
2.
f
o
s.o {
g)
t
l
=
3
ln
g.
o-
=(o
o-o
o)f
o-
f o
=o
o
o
J o
o
m
€z
m
o
z
-.{
_n
T
C'
m f'_n
z
-l
I
m
€z
m
o
m
o I z o
I
-]--
-+--
i
]X
j
I!
I
o
X
o
=z
-o
m
\+
--/m
m
R
)-l:
tP
J
o c -t
X
z
C l-
--l
o z
-.1
r
6
z
c
rI
6 ,
m
€
o o
--l
-0
m
m o
I
m
-.1
TO g€oI r;
-z n.
=
z>oo
n<
>o ol (,o
z
C
-.t
z
rTt {
--l
-1
I F 7
o
l c z
:
!
--t
1l
I
q
-0
o
P
c
l
z
fl)
H
-ONF !'!m E=- E:Ei EB 9- > 'rr
=zo rdi; o o xo<z
f-{ n O s,3!" 3 !i-.i^ ? c :Zz u,Clo6 o 'nzz
E=XY xx
cAl Ol No=
-l Nm=r'.:tl lql @ -€l El -o ol 3
F.l
I
I
I
T (,
z
H
rr
z
rrj
H
t-
H z
Ch
z
H
z
z o
F
c r
-
z
m a
z -o
=z 6 i
--t
I
vt2
!1 0 c- 'n triI <9
r c-
at)
ru4
fr N)
\o
E x
FT x DI x
PT !E
D{}4
P z
H P z
n
E
N
\a
--l
l-
m
=-n
m m
c (/)
m
x
o
tn
z
a
m !
I i
m 2
z
s m
€
m
m
_i
z
'n in m
th o I
z o
_o
c
g
z
m
m .)
o
l-
z ()
I
m o 7
CD
-0 z
'tt
m
=
m
=-.,|
'Tl
m m
UI
VALUATION
m
-
z o
m
I
2
t-
c
g z
fn
m
i
6
o
:c
=c)
1\)
7tt6/7b,/f/
O.fi c) f(Y(/
ilr,oo ll4/r
$ttra
(ltL
'l'thpt
Fl t'o
'i:,:,,i["'n
f e",Pro /"
fetEute t :
1, Ernfrig rs' liv5 ' *'; ll bc
htel 'vtnc .lo I t '
L Nco jeils 4hrt*51
J tt ^c/ *rt t (l) fo'*'
.c nt od ,|
^,
t icfu tnt f ft"t .o n"'/ fr
. Lc I t"/ tet , r), /,'n
eie h.
t1 tel tr
I
lerc/,
cittfc/c"t r
37rt'bol/:
Itnrl
)/e *
co/(crc/e
Ho ffa-
i. frort6e RJ W'
,tfil,t:r!:,j,
of rtc t
/erk
fai
1. lrlt Ncs frrntl l|"ols ,l'tc 1t/ {
e rfr,u/i*t '/ fr' ba/n/ Tttde
''.?.o/< t nr{t..to u+f.h 'tir/'21 '
Pro y or"'/ De't l' Et/cn/'ia
I^t rr/
3oo 6
/,ti/ Co' tt 6 s"D
Project Application
Project Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner. Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Lesal Descriptio ^, r^ * 1- , eb"x 6 , rlins
Com ments:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPR OVA L DISAPPROVAL
Su m mary:
Town Plan ner
./ . - fOl0f 0F 'fA:!, e0L0R'tD0
frvrm{ UZAlli
l','t"tii(t tl$J---etu.:t-L
fitt? tive ),
I
.it?tTICAtIOH RlCll\tED ;
DATE 08 DRB MEETING:
rttaattlrt
.18 lrtlllctBlor rtla ro! !l lgcttBrlr
-rD r&r rloulilD tlftoil|rBroH ll fulLrtrsD itftlttttt
ELi[J[il;r I r Nroi,Mdllos !
A. DE9CRTPTIONI
DR3 A'P'
Ao6,f
1F n
:,.crn ($50,001
.. rR.EsS : 3O0
.;rtructlon ($200,OU -{V1lnor Alterarian (6. 0O)
Conceptual Review (90)
y'ti
Block
a n.rtr and boundr l.gal
on t r.Parete ehcat anc
,F
Lot
I
property is dcscrlb.d by -:ption, pletga provlde -:,h t.o rhis applicatlon.
':.i:vlslon
1..;l A.REIr If rsqutrrdl
c.- ;,r,!!,eii gurvcy ehowlng
'.""i'i.i
;:,uBL Drovlaq c cL..'.Er.t
2 16-Z tV.F: _rppl lcent ioc arcr.
:-:iE OP APPLICANT;
.,lr . i lnE Address :
':a,ty'.*t -.J&-
-q. ;' .' L r '-r'\|J T ' S REPRESEN?ATIVE I
Addrcag
Ntu'i cF' 0l;1., i:
SIANAIuRE (8) I MalIlng lddraari
Phone
T
J. condonlnLum Approvrl l! rppllcrblc.
K. DRg 8EE: DRB laeer er rhohrn abovlr lre to br pald e'"the tlm. of cubmlttal of DRB rppltcatlon. IrBC€r, rhrn applylng for a bulldl.ng psrmlt, pleaae ld.ntlfy th.accuralc vaiuatlon of the propoaal, Thc Town of ValI wlII adjugt the fee according to the table belowr to
onsure Ehe correct fee is pald,
lEn trtDr t,,.. ..EEE SffIIFDULEI
VAIUATION
$ 0 - 0 101000 $ I0r 001 - I 50r 000 $ 50, 001 - 't 50, 000
9i5C,001 - .: 500r000
t5c0,00I - $1r 000,000 0 Ovcr S1r 000r 000
tsPrrrc,tstolf tl&t, t! tt0srfil!
flE
E 20.00 \
$ 50.00
$100.00
$200.00
0400 .00
$800.00
ilrEfiogt orillR, g Sto||r!ui!
__E_
rHQ
O
3@6 fto*rp'<t.c ?*t,
,h,-,(o. 8tt S8
?ESr\Fr'.:ct- oP L/e,z./ NoeccE
Fet,no=- EuaJA-i-r ar..J
s,rE ErS.\l*troil ->
S-r:r-r,rrs\ Br,
-eaz,*"*
lpo i, (o,rnux_
Cr.r.;-,crr-r. -E.c
r r-if -rr-5
'?.o'e't4r4
W\v G tltst
Cr A. RU;-, i! '9f 1F:tE tr'aHa i-HFiHNfL o .1 Dl.lvFt FDl.llf.la' S o F F c- A R'T P.Z.'?lt.-
r€vtsed 6/LS/9L
I CE o
DRB AP'I:JCAT::C!'I - TOWN OF '!/AIL,
DAIE A!PLICAIIOT{ RECE I'fED :
DT?E OF DITB MEE,TII.IG:
ttitttrrtt
COLORAf,O
fHIS .L?TT,IC.ET!ON TIILT. NOII BE ACCa" ..:D
UlrfII/ A'.I IT]IRTD INFONilAT1OH IS St'BMIITEb
t*tait*ltt
FF ]JE,CT-- lNFCRMATICI.,I :
)ESCRIFTION:_ t? tg r( ,.grt
t).
ADDR€SS t Joll^:i-- SoJh r So*f h lt
LEGAL )ESCRIPT.:Or:: rot J-Bl ock
$ubdlvr gicn
ti
LcT AREA, If r'aq'rlred, aPPIicant
s: anPeC s':lrveY s:loilrng IOt ateS '
I'rn*vE or-' APPLTCAN ::JLW**;LL* ,Fo'r/4 = ,', = r.
Aqldregs t.--3e.i^
-f ',* ), t lo
-hrtAz.L
Phone
lJAYi, Cf' C"'iNERS :ft Le
r,$IONATURE (g) :
If propert,Y iE dr:scribed bY
destrrpt ic,n, P.!elrse Preuide
ascach t.o thls a1:pllcation '
Yalirns AJdress i' +{ tL *'*!r!tU
-Is.gt-u-
C?- +o+3 /
-
Pncne
viCe
?ar :€
rcusL /
Ccrrciomlniuitr A5,pr c'ral if app:'!cabIe '
ensure f56 s6::s+'ct fed is Prid.
FEE I{HEEI.ILE'
DRts FEE; DRB i€Ber as shown above, are to be-Pald at
.l-* li." of sirbn i-L+-ar of DRI) appilcation ' I'ater' when
"irilvi'ts ior-i,-t urlding. perni:l - please ideriif y rhe
accurate va:uirr-:or, of fne p:opos-al' The Tob'n qf vari
"lf f "Airsr- Eile fee -accordilg .ro the t'abie beLow' Lo
vLLUArroll
i $0 s 10,001 c cA nnl v r,v, Yv-
$15Or001
s50c,'001
C alrro '^
- $ i:0,000
- $ lio, 000
- $ 1:i0,000 - $ $Do,oo0
- $1r0,)0rCC0
Slr C,)0' 000
I
I
.fagg-h) (ecf^- Ae/-ftt*l- e(1/''t' -sarl4 r*'tttt? '
hnlrr/t -
{'yq'-, cat*.cq-el,lt , ( to te tst' "u ct''t-beLc -
e fT{
,TYPE C3 -TEI'IEW:
il*'" i-'ci.3: r' - .: l.lorr
A(icrt)on tS5J.0{) )
f .''t L,.rt;Y e
,s200.00)
@,.,-ltiUtLczwttt,
Ne tu c +1T trt'r / 'ivX, t '' at t to& c ,tr I fiw '
n/ Mir.o\ A1:eracion (520. C0)
ConCe: ',.aI Rev,t e"; (S0)
,f
-*a meej'-s and bounds iegal
oil a separaEe sheet and
a curlenL
ElJE
$ 20.00
$ 50.00
$r.00. c0
$2C0,00
$40c.00
$500.00
[3o.il 414-Z
TfiO,ilPFLICTTIONI{IIIIEEF]IOCESEIIDI{TTHOUTOWNER'SSIGNAISRE
a t
-a
--..-
I
'l
1t:t'4 'i<--.. i r{ Tr
' "': t)t"r€ lJ;' ;;.."
: / r,-..a.r. )..:; ir('{1-\ '! r r /
ii. >. D t F( * ,, . Jr.-'.. '-' i'tc \r ' - ;'--\
l-.r 't- 7Zcll-i- ;LtVAi. lr;FJ
? l.*-, i A r L- -r b- A..i 'i'*
r u' A't
4 > \; E't*V't-' '"-
.r.r-)3 /.r, | 7- ;'.--) 3'/
-:, -- .. /;t;,,r. i/z.ic!.ti ati.: A-,€:;2,/1 a' rttztt /
/ .,., -c.r>, V."t, "t5 7 '71'r'#/
/nn' :(.' YL '15
sEp 1r ,s! L3:Ea KCNCoNNfl_ 4 DNVR RDNIN o P.V3
'.3TlTig,i,l;'lBJlS:?t Sutb 600
Denver, CO 8OZ2Z
- (303i691.6900
rAx (303,69t{9lo
mernb:r of rhe
plar's to add an
iNiTr-iirif,Tisidth
:'ffi lilT.lry.#ji,:iit [' iJifl:i,
-:
l, Larry.Hoffenr, as a voti,lg ravcr of golng ahead wirh'sroe ot ou,. t()wnhouses.
iiinci'relv,
frfA
Larry Hoffer1
,1 |
a
'91. L3:AA KCNC CFS| tL 4 DNVR RDMrN
.a
v
09. t 1. 91 1?:58 PM P02
FA)(TRAI'lSMfrfAL * ot P€op3 nalr-r-q-il Fuu
Cu'Co NBOKCNGT-V.ry FIHE+- f0O3)8614444
FAI *Frrr (303) 830-6537
o
sEP 11's1,.lFJ,pp",$xtc_!HcNNEL 4,ryv8*nDmrN
ccmpony.Inc. lt #ft:.?,T",
dU NBC
Septenber 11, 1991
O 4]a
Alon lh e'y'cirdld
YE Predd.,t
Afliliotc Sorrhes
PolPer-Virw Oyrnpirt
llr. Bruce Fil:r[Princlpat
Firsr and GaUfghf,, custon Bull.ders P.O. Box 484 VaiI, Colorado SI6SB
Dear Bruce:
The Flussheim AgEocj.ation, by a vote ef 4 to o with one ab'tention, has authorized iiraiviauat unit-ounei*-to extend the
$-egks facing gort6 creek. Atr thar ir ;;q"i;;J-Io autnorize this project is a eluple rnaioiity of three votes.
As you know, trro association ne'bers, nyqelf and Dtr. Larry Hoffer, have retained your firn to ertend the decks. Attachect to this letter are tuo indlvid,uar authorizationsr--one rrom nr.Hoffer, Unit 4 and one from ltr. Charles p"ifr""l--irrrit a.logether with my authorrzation ne constiiuaa-;'"irpre najority to authorize tbe deck extension.
r hope this willr onc€ and for alr, satisfy the Tov authorities.
Very truLy yours,
/h*;h-fu**il
Alan S. l{cDona1d
' /
ASM: fjc
Attachnent;
eut f,{r.Tdta
ntr I1 ol !t.Eo bM
/a*-
Alan S. DfcDonald
ASM: fJc
o
forsard to receiving both your check and
a voice rnail uhen you call please leave and say it slorly.
' - t{*r:
I
roa v{v 90r0t t6 6z'80
Compony, Inc
NDNBC
Aprl.l 12, 1991
If (vh you receive your ne nuhber
olrr.','to'aolm
303 830.6316 Vtc Frsidert
A{filhte Servr'cer
FopFer.Yrew
Us. Sarah uarf 2035 So. Josephlne - #rOe Denver, Colorado 8OZld
Deaf Flusshelu eroperty Orners:
]!-i1. tirlt^?glrn.--::9f:it.ab1y. $esonir quarrer dues r.n the afiount of $Zso.0o are-hereby iequested.
P].ease nake the th::Jc= payable to ,Alan lilcDonald Speclal Accountr and send trren io'n.-itJr^" address above. shoutd anyone need to contact-ne_ny tefepfrone nurnber is: offlce -e3o-63rG and home - 696-8r3a
Back Porch: fhere are three Flusshein owners rlho are entertainincr the notio" oi-ei[iiiing.^the back porch out about l jii.rl!-ilfr'""1l,*Sl":I:- ^*[.-tt"t- *,;;.-;;;. ;J- iennite prans :;"1;'l:":ll';n :'"!l:- ti.:-:l! i
-: ;'eT^=fr ;i+ii:ffi'ff :*:it=S. n'i3
Dorcb- pri'ar.r; _,i:fp:: t'.1tlli not_oveiiap with iny neishbor='--;_g::3gy wourd p9 nii"t"iffia-JE-iii :;:i. ""f""ffElll5=o,
lf,::'lil"i':,Ti :li:h_::":-"Jt ,+ o,ne.=, it i= ip-iropriate td\eather the Lnput rron aii--;;;";-;.;;F;;d;.,;":88il3:.";:endqre that ne bive your i-r;"i;';;u1d you pleise give me a calt at t\e telephone nunierE ad;;:
t'
1
ThankE.
telephone
Best wishes,
ook
1.
f.lr
Name:
Project Application
Date '/.3/,7a
Pro.iect
Project
Conlact
Descriplion:
Person and Phone
Owner. Address and Phone:3-/{ //u- ,j 47( - b:12
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Descriptio n: rct F L , etocx & 5 , r,ting Ur,-J ,-"6-.tn',o"," ln,^:
Com ments:
Zone
-
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAT DISAPPROVAL
,/'Ll //a'd&.;^
Town Plan ner \ a,"u Approval
DRB APPIJICATION
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED:
DATE OF DRB ITTEETING:
****TTHIS APPLTCATTON WTLL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORI,IATION rs SUBMITTED*****
r. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:
A pre-application neeting with a planning staff nenber is strongly,suggested to determine if any additional inforrnation is needed. No appLicatioir will be accepted
the zoning edministrator). ft is the appficant,s responsibirity to make an appointment wittr ttre staff to find out about additional subrnittal requirements. please note that a col,lPLETE application will streanline the approval process for your project by decreasing the nurnber- of conditions of approval that the DRB niy stipuLate. ALL conditions.of approval must be resolved before a building pennit is issued.. Application will not be processed without ownerts Signature.
A. PROJECT DESCRIE{IION:
JAL z=,_/,
B.IFCATION
Address
Legal Description Lot
Subdivisionf
C. NAME OF APPLICANT:
Mailing Address:
t?Block Z-
onrng
F.
G.
Phone 471 / --= *'<
D.NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATTVE: fu
I'tailing Address:
E.NAI.{E OF OWNERS:
AIGNATURE (8) s
Mailing
Phone
Condorninium Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE:pernit is paid for.
VALUATION
$o $ 10,001
S 50, oo1
9150, 001_
9500,001 $ Over
- I LO,00o - $ 50, ooo - s L50, 000 - S 5oo, ooo
- $1, 000, 000
$1, ooo, ooo
FEE
$ 10. oo
$ 25.00
$ s0.00
sr.00.0o
s200.0o
$300.00
(ovER)
II.IMPoRTANTNoTIcEREGARDII'IGALIJSUBMISSIoNSToTHEDRB:
A. In addition to rneeting subrnittal reguirements' the
ilpficant must stake itre site to indicate property
Iinesandbuildingcorners.Treesthatwillberemoved
rnust also be nark6d. This work must be conpleted
before the DRB visits the site.
B. The review Process for NEI{ BUILDINGS will nomally
involve two -eparate meetings of the Design Review
Board, so the -appticant should plan on at least two
meetings for a final aPProval .
c. Applicants who fail to appear before the Design Review-
B-oird at their scheduled-neeting and who have not asked
iot " postponernent will be reguired to be republished'
D. At the discretion of the zoning adrninistrator' the
i"fiowinq items may not have to be presented to the
Oesign n6view Board. They' however, have to be
pres6nted to the Ptanning Department for approval:
( ".\ windows, skylights and similar exterior changes
V that do not-alier the existing plane of the
building; and
b. Building additions that are not viewed from any
other t5t or public space, which have had letters
surn:.tiea froin adjoining property owners approving
the addition; andTor approval from the agent for'
or manager of a condorninium association'
E.YoumayberequiredtoconductNaturalHazardStudies on your propeity. you should checlc with a Town Planner
before Proceeding-
It
NAI'TE OF PROJEET:
I.,EGAL DESCRIPTTON:
STREET ADDRESS: Z
TIST OF },T,ATERIAI,S
WT .J BI,OCK +,
DEscRrprroN or pRoJEcrs 3 +r.:-/{-i ct+'3
required for subnlttal to the Design
approval can be given:
TYPE OF }IATERIAL COI,OR
The following information Is
Review Board before a final
A. BUILDING UATERIAI,S:
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
FIues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
other
I,ANDSCAPING: Name
E*er
B.of Designer:
Phone:
Botanical Name common Name ouantitv Size*
}L
PI,ANT MATERIAI-,S:
PROPOSED TREES
EXISTING TREES TO
BE RE!,TOVED
*Indicate caliper for deciduous trees. Mininun callper for
deciduous trees is 2 inches. Indicate height for coniferous trees. Minimun heiqht for coniferous trees is 6 feet.
r,
PIANT I,IATERIALS: Botanical Name Common Name Ouantitv Size*
PROPOSED SHRUBS
EXISTTNG SHRUBS
TO BE REI{OVED
*Indl-cate size
5 qallon.of proposed shrubs.Minirnum size of shrubs is
Tvt)e souare Footaqe
GROUND COVERS
soD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
C. OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swinming pools, etc.) Please specify. Indicate helghts of retaining
walls. llaximum height of walls withln the front setback is
3 feet. Maximum height of walls elsewhere on the property
is 6 feet.
lintratect p.o.box5?vail eoloratto 81668
IOOO lionsridge loop su.lte lr'd.(gos)4?6{s48 tax 4?6-49()l
7/za/ea
/4/atarTNL
*tl44lre
7ffi r:+eF
pr: o* Gmrrattpry friWzza.r
lQ' €KY/ /6*fT Nffitt-fi7oN
4c&7/r/q\4 ra ? rzau / P/ffie
FrrtareO )a ,A,&,qp-ilMa
TTrE Lanrtoit c>F fTE 3
T7*ar kJ4E /^IA-+uL,q /N
aF my rl/2zffine+tr
{2cea* LEr /hE lQUaut ir rteotfla^'l,t
lNW^tUT-taN /4 Nelrefv<-y 7a @PLEre
Yaus- Wlet! q 7>/Li4 An+2rry.
8r-frace
plercc frltzlen archit€cts lnc. alba htratedt atcbtt€cto.rE tnterlora, IandscaD€ {16s1€n
l.
i'=!
1A/TA
3?K*g:?s
3rs i
gt*
F
)
=rh"q9
o o z ls2 l,t 7 ls5
{6 z
!
-rm
97,mil
l=l lEo FO l!lf.J <FO I'n
i^!;m 5!
f {o
@ m x m t -{
o z
L o
@ L -{m
i
m .'l
-r tm
| --i o tn9 lm:l{J C,l'n o I!3 Im!
I=m IlS -{l-m l-l r
!!
6 t
o
C"o c
z
m o .n
m
={
rE
3P cC z=o@ 2=6o z
t-t
,'/
lt
,t ,'v' ,'
trEE
=FF iitr=IXo 3v=-p"
l-
n
={
ru
tr'r
z
u2
H z
ut F o
,H
I br)tll
t:
T'
o O r
N)
@
ctl
1o --t n+lfi v
It
8=
='d 8=
-l -\g>
e c
=I >!
c
!t-
=@ z
ov og
=h e!ic)o>:o l-
o
2n {m az >m c)E l>or-u
u o --m o -{
o €z m u
!
o
(D z
=IT
Frl
FI €N r
z
H r{F c)
r4
F b F F FI
/
nt-rr!m ciA o>'l-
/
/
/:
o {
D
w
fr o |-
r
lel
I
I
I
-n
=z
6)
>H r
H z
B
z H
z
,-{
m -m
l{lo t{
lz lo
In t<t>[-
l:o [t p
lz lo
I F
=
H o
E
lz to
l-rl t<t>
||-
la
Itn lo
lz lo
!t 3
!!I
-l m r
!r
a)
..4 t2
a i.fp
fp
U]
-.4
i o {z o n
L<
t>
lF It m le,z o
V1
v tr
m
F
Vl t
Y,
L
t'W
K
Y,
I
I
{
!!
n
s \.1
o\
I s.t,o vr
l-r to l{
lz lo tn
l<l>
IF
lm
lc,,lz
t:
lLn lr
I'
!
=
z
FJ
cl
z U'H n
H H
z
o
F H ri
!-
I
5 t\)
B
P
F m o
N
lJt .{
I !3
H z €F
H
rrl
}l
=
F
!
Or
I o\(,
5 tJ
3
!m o U'
x
!
#
F K a
7 td F H H N r{rt,
=o o -3E3a
iiEi eEi 3
=E
f,F
.n o =3 =-.oD C=--
E+if UieB
3aB=(og=o
ae1€
-t oE
il_g=il
sa 3i
Ie aE E1:i
i;*i
6:3n 3
ii*t
;*;€6'EFP to---
o
=o
-{o {J
D 1t
P.
c)o ct
(D
=o
a
o
z o c
5
--r o z
-l
o -z m
(r,
!
|-t-
m
o I {
o z
r
!m I
=-{u,z tn m o m .o l<"
lz
lz li
t>lr-
-{9d m
olm 9tF >lo !l
5l*"l tx
l"
I
n
m
J
€
-
n -
H rl
l\)o\t.J
F
I
@
I
F
I
@
q
-l
2
-t
Itr lu)
I
z
!!|n !r'
o m
l'-
€m t-
tr z o
z
i
o o
T
J
z c z f
t
z m {
m v
I 6 2
R
t9 x
_=o z
t-
T m t
=,
-.t
!m
o t o
rt
t-
1 6 2
Orrrr 2 sr $ !f,F io ->n Xzo I ?9 26,.4 := e H zt2 - 3 oo o -nzz
€o
x
No=
Sn1=(,,--
t-(:o<
3
r>
lu IF I'd t>IF
IF.l tg
Itrt lz I'IH
lo
tFr lx IH
lc/D H F a
F w rd
FJ'H iJ tt,a l)
F'l
F
I t,
o\
l.J (Jr
o
o
=z o
F
tr
F I z o z
i m o
z
=o
o
=z
!
o a
I
m
=-9 !1 2 Ft6,xo r4+s0 o>t{ t-
14 H c)F
\-o .;>
Oni
z
F H v)
N)
\o
o -{
r
!m T
=-{-n
m m u,
c g,
m
I
x
m
z
!
m
3 .4
m I c)z t m
m {
@ o
v o
a m o v m
6 2
1l m m
(,
X
3 Irt o I
z o
-
!-
3 q 2 o
m t-m {
d
-
!t-
z o I m o x
@ g -I z o
!m !3 {
!m I
=
=-tt
m m a,
VALUATION
!m u
=i
z 9
H
F r-
3 m o a
6
t-
!f
3
2 o
m F m o
1 o
F
o g -I -o
N vr tJr (Jr 5
o o o
a
o\o\
Or
l.J
o\
+
5 5 5 N'
N
N
\ $\-^' $\ \\
e fg r.t
fr*{tr Ht
{tf l.1 P r+rv
tl f{t
a \tD
|.1
|.1
-H
'?1 gt
a+
-t'l fF \-
GI tl
F ts H a+
-).4.f-l \E9 |t
E gl
Flo
Fa
H ts
-t -lr Fr w
-t :f r-
rEt
E l!.'ts
at|
-f.t
F|a .F'
-t -fg
i rF|
FF
-.1 <'/1 -.:+ .J ;.: \.i +;*r *=-l-H:;O (',.i :- -1 irj -.tYrix
^oZ--t ; F rl -D
a \J -..,1 A E=$I >9in'
ZXr:-?t'i<4 ob e {oiP
N --t -:
!'.1 T=F ,i->YQZ <'ll {Za+F=d
x>.-l s5*>fn*
-i -..t ! fn zxo
'*.ai
-- H fr:
=>t>Yaz Z:J ''v^
n fi'l \J '.< -l.'\r*zs=i.H
-^z
--.: v .i
-?L,:s<
FSoo <ze a-r^\
H=i
--:l Hxo
z
H H N -z
P
ts w H g
z H
tt
H H H
z
a H
trt
o
-!
I
E N v)
r
z z
H H N c-
z
F
3
H F
F
H rl'
lq
c-
FP
l..J \o \o
U)
z FI
P
{c{(/:
H
F
H
N)
4 ts
tri
e)x
F F
F..
H z H
F
z F{
H z
\o \o
t.J
*4=:=r- l .'i._-: -. -
= '=.^ ^;-: ! : 3 i,:=:.r 4 = =
':
=i= ! i ='.=
=; i 7
= =. i I =--=-!7.,a a z E a-:lai-: ='
=:.=;-i ? =: i +n:
3: e -- ?T : a. - > 2 :.: =.i ; i
1=^:{e L
^r = l Tlr Z'=-a.=;
a'!!.-a +
a i =1*-;:.: =i t .1
- ;: : r'4
=.
='
=.z
l5 lr\)
Ico
-
o
=
-l
z
>
o
z
o
o
r
o
m
May 14, 1990
!1r - Joe Norris
Town of Vail Buildlng Dept.
Town of Vall Munieipal Blds.
RE: Frltzlen Plerce Regidence Additlon
2998 S. Fr'ontage Rd. West
Qntratect p.o.box5?
Sincerely, ,/)
ny'**'z'1"*/ ./ ll Vy.n ilitzlen A Intratect
ps. 1
05149O05. doc
Dlerce fritzlen atchitectsinc. dba lntratect atchitectrue, interiors, landscape ateslgn
vail coloraalo 81658
IOOO lionsrld€e looB suite Vd (5()5)4?6-6943 fax 4?6'4901
Dear Joe,
Rollie Kjesbo of Nedbo Construction has commucicated to me
that you feel there may be a need to add an egress window to our addition in order to comply with Section 1204 of the 1988
Uniform Buildlne Code which reads as follows:
" - . . every sleeping room below the fourth story shall have at
least one operable window or door:. approved for emergency es-cape op rescue which shall open directly into a publlc
street, public a1ley, yard or exit court. "
The sleeping area provided in this studio apartnent is not
eeparated forn the regt of the living area- A 3' wide door
serves ae the means of egress from the s leeplng,/l iving area
and opens onto an exterior landing and stair. The stair fi-
naLizee l-n our sideyard - There ie no interior connection be-
tween the studio apartment pernitted and our reeidence.
In that the eleeping area is served by an exterior door and a
means of egreee that ureets the requlrements of Chapter 33 1t is my interpretation that an additional egress window ls not
required.
fhank you for your consideration, please cafl me with any
commments.
I
_/
a ?Y+o' o
1tr ot.o
j2'
lilli !!ii::'ar:,:'li.iTiil::*"'Hs*;, "Hs"::I h.r.by ccrrlfy4lret chk i4rovennr locrtlon csr
at:9.9. lcnderJ thc-slrl€ lururancc corprny, th or lryrovcunt rFrrroy plac, and rhaE lr te not- to beElted ornc of fracc, bulldllg, or other futurc lrlprov.Dent lLner.che logroveuents on the above descrlbad parcel on thr,s dace nccclona, are enclrely rrtrhln the boundail,ea of che p.r"-i,therc arc no encroachuenls upoo che descrlbed preolscs by Jotnlng preolses, ercapc as lodlceced, and chac rhers ls
as a dashed 'l ine on
PROXIMATE LIMITS 1OO
rer prrparad for lhc
no! a lend eurvcy plat
upoa for the G! tsbllsh-I furthbr cerilfy rha t
€rcept uclltty coo-ercspt aa shorrn, che !
loprovenenEs on any ad-
no apparenE evldence or
this map and labeled as "AP-
-*/
stgn of eny ealreuenE crosslng or burdenlng any part of 9a1d parcel, except as ooced.
/
Thlg certlllcace docs troc consclluce a ttclo rearch by rnter-llouncaln Engln.€rtng to dccar.ln. orancrehlp oE arle'anca of rccord. For erl rnforoaclon ragardlng
'aa.E ntr' rl3htr-of-vey or rlcr. of rrcord, rncor-lrountaln Englncrrln! rrrr-a uPon lho Finol Plot of Voil Inbrmountoin Devetopmont Subdivision Btock 5.
/
2M FLOOR LIWNG
AREA IS CANTILEVERED 3.6 OVER WOOD DECK UNIT
5
rt.iis-gHg*tt
Tril{',:\fffu..:rii$
RECERTIFICATION
N0TICE: According to Colorado law, you must cofiaence
any legal action based upon any defect ln thls survey
wlthln three years after you flrst dlscover such defect.
In no event, may any actlon based upon such defect ln
thls survey be comnenced more than ten years frcm the
date of the certlflcatlon sho.n heron.
,.#;rili?;-(:i{,"{F-.'!
.n $Clnn,lilirjlts
AK EL. 7840-0
oa
.29 oa
ia\
$
The approximate limits of the 100 year flood plain of Gore Creek as defined in "Gore Creek
Floodplain Information" dated June,l975 by Hydro
Triad Ltd., of Lakewood Colorado have been plotted
.?
l;l: ,r t?
.'a;o,
?t ,
,l'n'lo
">;<-b ocx\
- ?"'
$ wooo/-
.'o\s{'"""%
\},
wooo DEcKs :_/ ,/i"l
o ll1 q\
:\
*or
:r ,r/ ,{$\o,tl ra \a \(l ,\f '- sg6;";-'
&/Yu""0 r
roFr 97t A'EI\CCLO.Iil'O rct!a.l-!orz
9g-
2./'At IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIF ICATE ffi6-8.-^ gozes s tmGf
ts-ADosD FL@O PLAIN A PART OF LOT 2, BIJOCK 5,
VA1L INTERIqIOLiNTAiN DEVEI-OPMENT SUBDMTS//OI\
ErcLE @UNTV COLORADO .
.'tr 'tt TV a BD
f,Dr 6,/zr/go Dra
6/2?RECIRTIFICAf ION CGEo !t. B.T.K,E.f l" = 2d
@-r-28 toFt
I
L1
-^riltoN
TOWN OF PERMIT NUMBER OF' PROJECT
I
It I DATE \ - .-, JOB NAME
UFST
I
I
o
L
RE
VAI
\'.-\,t;.t'l.'
THUR i-'
1-<."r '
cnuen \.
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
;--' 11;','..l
MON TUES
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
O FRAMING
_ ROOF & SHEER
" PLYwooD NAtLtNG D GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
FINAL ? o r,*ot
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER D HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
D FINAL E FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
I lr
vlL.t€
PEBMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
. TOWN OF VAIL
I t.<,L T',. na* -
It_eu.^c.&-
l_r\
ffnerr.rseecroN REeuTRED
JOB NAME
CALLER
-a'-.\READYFoR|NSPECT|oN:MoNTUES|,WED',,THURFR|-AMPM
LocArloN: /q?'r t - - lv , ,'t ('{''' c'' rr'( - '",^'l':+
D APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
f orsneenoveo
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGBOUND
D ROUGH / D,W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
ON / STEEL
n ROOF & SHEEF " PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL;
tr TEMP. POWER
MEGHANICAL:
D HEATING
B ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL
tr
D FINAL
INSPECTOFI
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
--l ')- |
CALLER
TUES WED THU
)t,+'a--7 . /'- r t
r (€ lc Y-qta\ Q I
l /, l rl ,llaV9 | (ec tv. r ._
PM AM
7.''7'i7 T )t l.-'
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
I] FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
rr ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
O INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
D FINAL D FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHAN!CAL:
O HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr ROUGH
tr COND
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
N DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
NUMBFR OF PBOJECT -, l' /'.lrr '/- / .\ JOBNAME
CTION TOWN OF
)fr (, :
s N
\, i; r,)
$F9u:'l PERMIT
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INS
CALLER
TUES WED -----@a ff(\
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
O ROUGH / D.W.V,
N ROUGH / WATER
B FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
,- BOOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H, TUB
B^SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
O ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
FINAL
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
LW1S ;
PERMIT NUMB
o
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
R OF PROJECT
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
v rYl
CALLER
TUES WED
| -.
t (- {-\*---
!
rNstinoN . TOWN OF
l( /<e-
ST
I $F9UF
7ao/
PM AM
c )-1 {'..- -
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
o
o
o
tr
tr
o
UMBING:
D FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER O FRAMING
GAS PIPING
POOL / H, TUB
tr
tr FINAL
tr
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWEB
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr
o
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL O FINAL
PPROVED
IRECTIONS
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
rNSfctoN REQUEST vArL I
Ll PERMIT NUMBER OT PNO.ITCT TOWN OF
( ! a <=-/ORre i '-- JOB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:.' MON \
if
CALLER
IUIJ THUR WED AM PM
a'- I -)'.1...! i
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
D
tr
tr
tr
o
UMBING:
D FOUNDATION i STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH i WATER O FRAMING
_ ROOF & SHEER " PylwooD NATLTNG
hdrusuurroN
-
GAS PIPING
POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
D D
tr tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH o
D
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
N FINAL tr FINAL
APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
/ ,,t,t ,/,/ '/"INSPECTOF .:',,. .; y', (
niiis,"'
DATE
I
\ ,. - \-r',- ll*[) .,o, *or=
\ '1,*CTION TOWN OF
a
PE
\,.\
$FSU:'l PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
WED\. THUR
\ \(\ \..
MON \,\...,.
AM PM
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
zuouGH / D.w.v.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
D FOUNDATION / STEEL
RooF & sileen tr GAS PIPING PLYWOOD NAILING
I,NSULATION
SHEETROCK
O POOL / H. TUB
FINAL O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POW
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr ROUGH,tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
p.aeenoveo
CORRECTIONS:
E DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
INSPECTOR
!r?Fisr.oe
PERMIT NUMBE
DATE a
READY FOR INSPECTION:MON
rr.rsilcrtoN
L'lJ 'ay'zr,,
\) Yat ,A./ /,J ^"@
T
.t --r'
') /),'
T
JOB
ROJEC o
Dt w,7,
ST
t 9UF
*
RE
VAI
2.. ,
CALLER
LOCATION:u//
aP
,/0
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND n
o
FOOTINGS / STEEL
FOUNDATION i STEEL ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER tr
D
tr
tr
D
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr
D
tr
POOL / H. TUB
SHEETFOCK NAIL
olrfunr-tr FINAL
ELECTRICALT
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
o
tr
B
ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL C FINAL
./tr APPROVED PPROVED :E('REINSPECTION REQUI RED
CORRECTIONS:
oo-. (-- ) /-fLt rNsPEcroR
- i";i t:,a rNsfcnoN
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT . TOWN OF
/i- rCe-
REQUEST vAtL t
*t { . r.n.-DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION:WED THUH
'- '' , 'l ;.','l- ",'l !
BUILDING:
N FOOTINGS
D FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
ON / STEEL
- ROOF & SHEEB " PLYWOOD NAILING I] GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL i H. TUB
O SHEETROCK NAIL tr
.
tr
tr
o FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
/noucn tr EXHAUST HOODS
O SUPPLY AIR
D
tr FINAL
tr Appnoveo
CORRECTIONS:
O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
prFsrop
t ,, 1l'9',i'T NRE
OF VAI
i -t \
o
N
I
.:
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
D^rE G',JOB NAME
INSPECTION:MON WED.. THUR ./ o* 'PM READY FOR
LOCATION:
CALLER
TUES i
,l 1"
FRI
l'-{
, ': i | ,
BTJILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
n
D
tr
D
C
UMBING
tr FOUNDATION / STEE_
UNDERGROUND
BOUGH / D.W-V,
ROUGH / WATER O FRAMING
tr
tr
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr
tr FINAL O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. PO
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
EI ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT O SUPPLY AIR
tr tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
O APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
O DISAPPBOVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE ,T INSPECTOR
PERMI
DATE
PROJECT
JOB NAME
tt
INSPECTION I TOWN OF
t'
'-r' i | . t :. r'..c, 1-
CALLER
TUES READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON r11l AM.) PM
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
E FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n BOOF & SHEEB " PLYWOOD NAILING D GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
N FINAL
, ,i,,,' o ,,*o,-
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
o
o
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT O SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL D FINAL
Anppnoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
.'..|-DATE INSPECTOR
n'!Fs!.or
'r_\ i c-1.f---
T\NUMBER OF PROJECT
L\ - ,\ - ','r) JoB NAME
'::
l I It
INSP\Qrlo-N;_.
\. . t,'-f
-
t-U
INSPECTION TOWN OF
'\ ..- '..". .
REQUEST
VAIL PERMI
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
CALLER
TUES .WED THUR
,.--]--\AM PM
.\
SGeenoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D,W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
OOTINGS i STEEL
tr
tr
tr
o
D
tr
tr
FOUNDATION i STEEL
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
POOL / H. TUB
FINAL
tr TEMP. POW tr HEATING
D ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL O FINAL
INSPECTOR
pffiscp
4z K s't
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE > /t7-/u/L JoB NAME
INSPECTION:MON
TNSPECTION REOUEST
wN oF vArL/ : ;/<rt (/ef( € 1.r">./ t
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI PM AM READY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
o
!
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH i D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER tr FRAMING
_ ROOF & SHEEB " PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL i H. TUB
D SHEETROCK NAIL
tr
O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
D TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
O CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
D tr
tr FINAL O FINAL
PPROVED tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
/, - ,/a)omt Z/iz/'7L tNSPEcroR
l' /4':5 6/ft'/e
The iterns below
glving a perult
Please check off
FINAL PLUAING
AL INSPECTIONIS
need to be corDplete
a flnal C of 0.
ln the box provlded.
CO'PLETEI)
before
l_.
DATE:
FINAL UECHANICAI.
DATE:r IUPROVEMENT SI'RVEY
w
,*r, (p - 22fr 4
FINAT ELECTRICAL
FINAT BUILDING EAST SIDE:WEST SIDE:
DATE:
TN,TPORARY C OF O
DATE:
OF OCCUPANCY IX -T-
I
I rl LA}IDSCAPING DIIE
DATE:
FILE NAUE:
3?L1E tlffi fh'zaa/7/zaa*z- e''/q<t fcd
Project Application
t2 , tY'1t
Name:Projecl
Project
Contact
Description:
Person and Phone
Owner. Address and Phone:
Arch itect, Address and Phone:
Lesat oescriptil K J -z-, Btocx 5 , riingV, t',^fr't -.-^^"a'-- , zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
DISAPPROVAL
Town Plan ner
Date:/' 3,??-
Staff Approval
l|.-.
i!''" '
.,91
Date 3
Job No
Re:
vail colorado 8lti56
1U00 liclrsli(1li.: l(jop suiL(' i/d
,:",u3) "l;'$.d3.i2 1.r! ,l7ti-49U.
LETTER F TRANSMITTAL
To:
Attn:
Attached Please Findl
Progress Prints
Plans
Other
_ Specifications
_ Shop Drawings
o
,i
ftem No. No. of Copies Description
| / rtrr,^t.',r,',.. fr .,t z'z/btutole. 7
,*1,,rrn,,,
The
Remarks:
items listed
For Review and
As Requested
Other
above are:
ConEnent Xror Your Use
Returned After Review Y.-.
Copies to:
age 1
'!rAN8000,DOC
A RCH ITEC TURE PLANN ING IN IERIORS
December 9, 1991
Mike l"tollica
Town of VaiI Conrnunity Development
75 S. Frontage Rd. W.Vai1, CO 8f657
Re:
Dear Mike:
Revised Landscape PLan Fritzlen,/Pierce Residence A Part of Lot 2, Block 5, Vail Intermountain
2998 S. Frontage Rd. W.
terial List. The landscaping was related to the con-struction of an employee housing unit on our property.
The landscaping (including sod and irrigation system)has been installed per this plan with one exception: We installed only 7 Russian Golden Willows rather than the
not have room for more than 7 of these trees. An ex-
ample of these trees (about 12 years old) is south of the Sandstone 70 Westview Building.
We feel this plan is an improvernent over our prewious submittal and hope that. we can gain staff apploval for the plan.
Attached is a revised Landscape Plan (2 copies) and Ma-
Please ca'fl/me /f you have any questions.
ts*t =.ou"!".//lWrll fi'l-tiam F. Eierce Architect i I /,/:/t/It
l,/-./
Page 1
MOT-,LICA. DOC
POST OFFICE 80X 57 1000 LIONSRIDGE L00P VAIL COLORADO E 1656 303 476 6342 FAX 303 476 4gO1 ptE! tiTltri tt(. t{ trrl.ltr
'.Fct tr.aa
>.=
r.-na4,nTl
APPLICATION DAT[:
DATE OF DRB ME ET ] I,IG :
INFORMATION IS SUBI.lITTED"****
o
R!-r'
PRE-APPL] CATION MEETING :
A pre-application meeting with-a planning staff member is strongly suggested t0
aeie.mihb if any additional jnformation js needed. No application will be accepted
unless it is complete (must include all i tems requi red by the zoning administrator).
It is the applicint's responsibjlity to make an appointment with the staff to fjnd
out about additional submittal requirements. Please note that a COMPLETE appiica-
tion will streamline the approval process for your project by decreasing the number
of conditions of approval that the DRB may stipulate. ALL conditions of approval must
be resolved before a building permit is issued.
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:' /_ Ax /l).:::;,'- /1 r -{.._:;//-s//^t t
L -'f^ .t..?ra {. /J)/ '.r," ,//1)E':
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
s467s5s,1fT1*., /-1, ft/-ayrTt r-:' {-t2, /, I,
| ^^-l n^-^".i^J- .i^^LtrgO I UE)Ll rPLrurr
DRB APPL]CATION
*****THIS APPLICATION l'lILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL
Block K 5- Filine '/Yn.ttl*'
B.
Lot ,L
CANT:PLI AP c
D.
E.
Zoni ng
NAME OF
Add res s
F.
NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE :
Addre s s
NAME OF 0l,lN
Si gnatur
Address
DRB FEE : The f ee w'il I
VALUAT I ON
, l-'f / ) .-t a telephoneJ /cL>-l- :'
tel ephone
be paid at the time a building permit is requested.
FEE
$ 0-5 10,000
$r0,001 -5 50,000
$50,001 -$ i50,000
$I50,001 - $ 500,000
$500,001 - $I,000,000 $ Over $1,000,000
$ io.00
$ 25.00
$ 50.00
$100.00
$200.00
$300.00
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
i. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant Inust stake the site
to indicate property iines and building corners. Trees that will be removed
should also be marked. This work must be completed before the DRB visits the
< i te
?, The review process for NEl,l BUILDINGS will normal1y involve tr'/o separate meetings
of the Design Review Board, so plan on at least two meetings for their approval .
3. peopie who fajl to appear before the Design Review Eoard at their scheduled
meeting and who have not asked for a postponement will be required to be
reoublished.
,{AME OF PROJECT:
DESCRIPTION OF PR
Roof
S id'ing
Other Wal I Materi al s
Fasc'i a
Soffi ts
l,li ndows
lili ndow Trim
Doo rs
Door Trim
Hand or Oeck Rails
Fl ues
Fl ashi ngs
Chi mneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhou s es
0ther
LIST OF MATERiALS
€rrr-.-/ //;l,n'l [/t
l4la,-,.LEGAL OESCRIPTI0N: -STREET ADDRESS: '4
The foliowing information is required for submittal by the applicant
Eoard before a fina) approval can be fiven:
A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL
to the Design Review
COLOR
B. LANDSCAPING: Name of Des'igner:
pnone:
PLANT MATERIALS: Botanigal Name
itA'-'v
PR0POSED TREES Ac&q - VtTH-L/*ta
Eu44t ir'J
daL2Ft /
Common Name Quani ty
i.
EXISTING TREES
BE REMOVEO
ro E#czt**r*"i. iA---1-'v'-iU ,;;1,*";.r -*- p / n, / /::
*Indicate cafiper for deciducious trees.Indicate hejght for coni fers.
{ovpr'l
li ):
f,
treeE.
?I}''T I.!ATERIAI.,S:
PROPOSED SHRUBS
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
Indicate height for coniferous
Ouantitv Size*Conmon Name
EturvJ/6 EW*@c2
U/ftHPr.l
#A'b#.e'!tO
4:amrn64 / t L '+.4
*Indicate si-ze 5 qalIon.
GROUND COVERS
SOD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRTGATION
Square Footage
of walls within the front setback is of wallE elsewhere on the property
t
:.il
Frt
c.
TvJq oB..!{ETHOD
EROSION CONTROIJ
pooJs, etc walls. llax 3 f,eet,is e feet
( EAL.
Z+56*c
54+,--
of, proposed shrubs.Minimum size of shrubs is
ahF.t%;A^tA
b'-r *
I
o o
f*U4 / //L-1
/l
/"r;^- Wt,/'.
/
7.ro'70
z^;t t-."'^, R/*';J
t g ltl)-I
il
LfA,-- 9"rq /r-+n^ k4 .U/ tfrt."*h^.
- AVl Ey.d u"-U, vt S t "//,.-( '@ f^r-t*+.- Vr,'( cbad +- tr
o a
I
I NTEP..OEPARTI.IENTAL REV I El,|
PP.OJECT:
DATE SUSI4ITTED: ,1. zt! 7o OATE OF PUELIC HEARING ',1/A
CCI'u,iENTS ltEEDEo BY :_Al4!-_
RIPTION oF THE PR0POSAL: 3o,n ^ ,,^t/ V{te Z.n k /"^.(1
,^.JJ .k k*rt-/ )-- a'- S'-o" /^.,r'-l l rl&f
A ra.u^.'( (
-y heg t/^tt oxr4d?,*
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
@ w-u.lJ noI l;t,<_ L ,ez-_
d-"-;^^rL ea-9Li^^"^,|bl.-L*L V\zeA-,cooA Approv"[ -|-o b;h -Ia.=
cL> -l,L;^ dr..l-,n*-0- ,uuu lJ U52- ;+
FIREDEPp.RTIiENT f , / \"'ff lc..n+"c+ vL l-["-tl
Reviewed by: 1,.
*'v | ( -("/' Date i" "ftr)
!
Cor.r,aant s: ,/-\'U &t - utr'tl;.,n/zJ 1- S;7 ^- "{+
FI RE DEPP.RTI.iENT
POLICE OEPARTI4ENT
Revieved by:
Connerrts:
Date
'{r.
.i.ri
RECijEAT i 0X DE PARTt.t :NT
Revieaed.by:
Co.-;ents:
Cc;ri,ents:
0a te
.1
APPLICATION DATE:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
DRB APPLICATION
*****THJS APPLICAT]ON t,tILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS SUBIlITTED*****
I. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:
A pre-appljcatjon meeting with a planning staff member is strongly suggested to
deiermihe if any add'itjonal information js needed. No applicatjon will be accepted
unless it is complete (must include all items required by the zoning administrator).
It is the appiicant's responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to find
out about additional submittal requirements. Please note that a C0MPLETE applica-
tion will streamljne the approval process for your project by decreasing the number
of conditions of approvai that the DRB may stipulate. ALL conditions of approval must
be resoived before a building permit is issued
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
B.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Address ,z'7??> :1 <-t_]ri-,a
Legal Description Lot
Zon'ing r/,
c. NAME 0F AppLICANT: ---', l+. t {'1.: .',r:, :,,,,/ Lilt t-lt:. t t 4,' t !-'
I
Addres s tel ephone
n
E.
NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE :
t)
L Bl ock
''/-il
F 1 | l nat I lllllY /.jL, a-r-. :,-r
tel ephone
',f i
..'-t
tel ephone
be paid at the time a bui lding permit is requested.
FEE
DRB FEE: The fee wi'l I
VALUAT I ON
$ 0-$ 10,000 $10,00i-$ 50,000
$50,001 -$ 150,000
$150,001 - $ 500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000 $ Over $1,000,000
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL
Addres s
NAME OF
Si gnatle
Address
F.
$ 10.00
$ 2s.00
$ so-oo
$100.00
$200.00
$300.00
SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
1. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant must stake the site
to indicate property lines and building corners. Trees that w'i l'l be removed
should also be marked. This work must be completed before the DRB visits the
-.: .-^>I LE.
2. The review process for NEl,l BUILDINGS will normally involve tlo separate meetings
of the Design Rev'iew Board, so plan on at least two meetings for their approval.
3. People who fail to appear before the Design Revjew Board at their scheduled
rneeting and who have not asked for a postponement will be required to be
republ i shed.
LIST OF MATERIALS
NAME O; PROJECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET AODRESS I
DESCRIPTION OF P
Roof
Si di ng
0ther Wall Materials
Fasci a
Soffi ts
l,Ji ndows
l,lindow Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fl ues
I
The foliowing information'is required for submittal by the app'licant to the Design Review
Board before a final approval can be fiven:
A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR
Fl ashi ngs
Chimneys
B. LANDSCAPiNG: Name of Designer:
Phone:
Trash Enc'l osures
Greenhouses
0ther
PLANT MATERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
41L- bua
Botani cal Name
AUlx
ALqA-V|T€LUilA
Common Namg
E*-/al*t'r &Oe+l
tFlrt 'l-aL^l
Quani ty
l7
Si ze*
FIIllIryG TREES T0 ?ELrl- e,", T".: Fy eflilt<- W BE REMOVED
*Indicate caliper for deciducious trees. Indicate height for conifers.
(over)
tt_/tl
- PLANT I'IATERIALS:
(con't)
SHRUBS
Botanical Name
EED€IEN
+Lrz.A-J trd t tNA
Common Name Quani t_y Size
f
I
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
GROUND COVERS
Tvpe
4t _ 1{ Gm-
Square Footaqe
PEC'-I41'1
SOD
SEED
TYP5 OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
c.OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining wa11s,swimming pools, etc.) Please specify.fences ,
^A) q
7 . t./
,,'"*
4'0 ro'
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
WHEREAS,Lynn Fritzlen is the owner of the property
described as:
r+E1rZr85 F-5;:4 F-9eUr
JOHNNETTE F'HlLLIFTS
fi3/e1 /2fi t?244 PG I OF e
ERGLE CEUNTY trLERK' COLORADE
A part of Lot 2, Block 5, Vail Intermountain Subdivision
l{E L.
18, B|a
Dgc
Ur. OlZl
herein referred to as the trsubject propertyrri and
WHEREAS, the owner wishes to place certain restrictions on the use
of the subject land for the benefit of ttre owner and the Town of Vail'
col-orado (ttthe Tohrnrr) .
NOW, THEREFORE' the owner does hereby irnpose, establish,
acknowledge, declare, for the benefit of alf persons who may
hereinafter purchase, or lease, or hotd the subject land, the following
restrictions, covenants, and conditions, all of which shall be deemed
to run with the land and inure to the benefit and be bindj-ng upon the
owner, its respective grantees, successors, and assigns.
L. The subject property has a secondary employee dwelling unit
in the approximate size of three hundred eighty ( 380 ) square feet.
The secondary employee unit located on the subject property shall not
be sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from the primary dwelling
unit located on the subject property for a period of more than twenty
(20) years and the life of Tiffany Lowenthal , from the date that the
certificate of occupancy is issued for said secondary employee dwelling
unit.
2. The secondary ernployee dwelling unit shall not be leased or
rented for any period of less than thirty (30) consecutivei and, if it
shall be rented, it shall be rented only to tenants who are fu1l-time
employees of the upper Eagle Va11ey. The Upper Eagle Valley shall be
deened to include the Gore Valley, Minturn, Red Cliff, Gilman, Eagle-
d 0r
vail, and Avon, and their surroundingt areas. A full-tirne employee is a
person who works an average of thirty (30) hours per week'
3. Ttre secondary dwelling unit shall not be dj-vided into any
forrn of time shares, interval ownership, or fractional fee ownership'
4. The conditions, restrictions, stipulations, and agreements
contained herein shall not be waived, abandoned, terminated, or
amended, except by the written consent of both the Town of Vail and the
owner of the subject Property-
I
\
L
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
hY day
of
My commission expires:
PROPERTY OWNER
My conrmission extrrires:
Address
ACKNOWLEDGED
Prmcta A. Bnrdnrcycr. ltlotary Pubrc
S. Fontage Road Vril, CO 8167
me this UtP day
N
cn
of The f oreqoincr instrument was (L6nL- , Js6 bv
Address
Pamela A- Brandmry?, Notary fubllc
My Commission expires Aug. 5, 1992
75S. Fontage Road Vail, CO 81657
TOWN OF VArL, COLORADO
nda1l
acknowledqed before
l^L.twil frifulva-
Notary
,ic l ertJ:j E-5ltrjrr F'--?Jrjt k1:i,/ii: 1 1 30 .'|a:'" 44 F-,[:i ;:i i]fj ;::
Q,,lrt |f-L "-/ /fO-"L &"4 y'A'' .-T
6r- "/'( ;te** fe- Kn'aa
December 17, 1989
Pierce Fritzlen Architects Inc.dba Intratect
Town of VaiI
Department of Comrnunity Development
75 South Frontage Rd,VaiI Colorado 81657 Attn: Betsy Rosolack
RE: lfinor Subdivision of Flusshei-m Towrrhomes Iot 2, Block 5, Intennountain Subdivision
_t--_Dear Betsy,
Thank you for your letter of December 14, 1989 are responses to ytur items required:
n*zt-"--
. The following
Coforado 81657
303-476-5342
I
.V- 1. The vacated lot lines should be narked with a dash line L-/t and labeled.
RESPONSE: I have requested Intemountain Engineering to pro-vide this information and this will be accomplished within the next couple of days. The only lot lines that have been vacated are between the townhomes. I don,t think we need to go through a minor subdivision as well as a townhouse plat due to the fact that, the lot line between parcel A and B has not changed. Please clarify.
f^Lz. A note on_the anended plat which atates: "For zoning pur-U\ f)oses, Parce]. A is to be Lreated as one entity withan*e ti+ one 2-faniry residence allowed. parcer B which consists of 5 townhomes is to be treated as one entity for zoning pur-poses'
/,yr* *,)(/ /.6h r\ ffa 7'r'.a{ '#an-"
RXSPONSE: I understand the l:nportance of physically distin-guishing the two parcels for zoning purpoies but I do not think_ it appropriate to state that onlv a 2-fanily residence is allowed on Parcel A. All property o\dners have lhe right to apply for a zone change through the proper channels. Given Vail's current pace of development, in several decades, the town may chose to upzone all outlying areas to accommodate demand. An approved zone change in conflict with restric-tions on an approved plat is not a desirable condition.Therefore I request that the phrase ',no more than" one 2 family residence be removed from the tequirements.
I
Ak 3. Townhouse declarations nust be submitted with the plat.tl\
RESPONSE: I will provide the town with a copy of the original
Flussheim Townhouse Declarations with the resubmission.
I
,.1_ 4. A portion of Townhouse *l encroaches onto the adjacent Lot \\\ I to the west. An easelnent must be obtained fron the owrrers of lot 1 and nust be shown on the plat. A second alternative
would to renove the encroachment from 1---/Z+,-
RESPONSE: Neither Townhouse #1 nor the described easement encroach onto Lot 1. A portion of the rounding the buiLding does.
,,1 5. The title compEury must sign the plat.IF
RESPONSE: This will be accomplished prior to resubmitting the application.
.y' 5. The certificate of taxe$ nust be signed or a separate cer-Ui- tificate of taxes paid nusa, be included with the application.
RESPONSE: I \,sas under the impression the last time I spoke to the Department of Corununity DeveJ-opment that the tax cer-tificate was ascettained at the tirne of filing in order to insure that no taxes had accrued between the time of plat ap-proval application and the time of actual filing which at a
minimum is four \'reeks and can be up to months. please clarify the Town's policy on this.
Sincerely,
Lynn Frit,zlen Applicant
;//rl'& e
4.h.j pedestrian
stair sur-
75 south frontage road
Yall, colorado 81657
(303) 479.2138
(303) 47$2139
office of community dev€lopment
Decenber l-4, L9a9
Ms. Lynn Fritzlen Intratect Architects
Box 57 VaiI, Colorado 81658
Re: Minor subdivision of Flussheirn Townhouses, Lot 2, Block 5,
f ntermountain Subdivision
Dear Lynn:
The staff tras revier^red your requests for a rninor subdivision and
condo/townhouse plat review. The following items are still needed:
1. The vacated lot lines should be marked with a dash line and
labeled.
2. A note should be on the arnended plat which states: rrFor
zoning purposes, Parcel A is to be treated as one entity with
no more than one 2-fanily residence a1lowed. Parcel B which consists of 5 townhornes is to be treated as one entity for
zoning purposes."
3. Townhouse declarations must be subrnitted with the plat.
4. A portion of Townhouse #1 encroaches onto the adjacent Lot 1
to the west. An easement rnust be obtained from the owners of
Lot 1 and must be shown on the plat. A second alternative
would be to remove the encroachment from the p1at.
5. The title company rnust sign the plat.
6. The certificate of taxes must be signed, or a separate certificate of taxes paid must be - inctuded witi the appllcation.
r know it has taken you guite a long time to reach this point, but
we - canno! pulrListr your reguest for a pubric hearing untir this infornation is received.
Sincerely,
&,,*'"t-l Betsy Rosolack
Planning Technician
\$,'*
NAME OF
MAILING
l--, ,'/\ _-- \DATE Decenber 1f 198 9
A.
B.
APPLICATION FOR
MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW (4 or fewer lots)- Flussheim Townhouses
APPLICANT Wi11i"* pi"r"", l,r 1HONE 476-6342
ADDRESS p.o. B,ox 57. Vail Colorado 81658
NAME 0F AP PL I CANT' S REPRES ENTAT I VE_b"s__Ej!z.Le"
MAILING ADDRESS p.o. F,ox sz. vair co 81658 pHoNE 476-6342
C. NAME 0F PROPERTY OWNER(S) (print or type) William pierce. Lvnn Frltzlen. Charlotte Walter. Alan McDonald,
tLebauur III
OWNER'S SIGN PH0NE 476-6342
MAILING AD
D. LoCATI0N 0F pRopoSAL (ADDRESS) zgge.:ooo.3ooz. :ooa,:ooo,:ooe
S. Frontage Road West, Vail CO L0TS z BL0CKS S SUBDIVISION rnrermounrain
F.
E.FEE $100 PAID l1
MATERIAL TO BE SUBMITTED
The subdivider shall submit three (3) copies, two of which must be myiars, of the proposal-following the requirements for a final plat as found in section .l7..l6..l30 of the Subdivision Regulations. cerlain of these requirements may be waived by the zoning administrator and/or the Planning and Environmental commission if deteimined not appl icable to the proj ect.
41 9!ujronmental report may be required if so stipulated under chapter .l8.56 of the zoning cooe.
The Department of community Development will be responsibie for seeing that-the approved plat is promptiy recorded with the Eagle county clerk and Recorder.
G.
H.
I. Include a list of all adjacent property owners (.i ncluding those behind and across the street) with their mailing addresses.
$ 100 .00
I
December B, L989
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development Attn: Mike Mollica
Dear }like,
On behalf of Williarn Pierce and the owners of Flussheim Con-dominium Association I am submitting applications for a Minor Subdivision and a Townhouse Plat of Lot 2, Block 5, Vail In-termountain Subdivision.
The purpose of the plat is to clear up several title problems that have been a source of contention for several years. Our property which is the eastern portion of Lot 2, Block 5, was originally subdivided in a court decision.
The original owner of Lot 2, Block 5 and developer of Flussheim Condominiums platted the property into t\do parcels,A and B. He proceeded to build Flussheim Condominium on par-cel B but went bankrupt during construction of the townhouses on Parcel A. An abandoned foundation remained for many years until we built our home on parcel A. In approximately L974,when the original developer went bankrupt the court ordered that Parcel A be legally subdivided and sold as part of the bankruptcy settlement. Titre transferred several times and in L983 I purchased Parcel A.
The court ordered subdivision reft a nurnber of items unclear,most of them related to whether parcel A is subject to the easement restrictions described in the Flussheim condominium Declarations and the original plat. Our title company thought not and issued us a policy on that basis. When- w6 started building our neighbors became avrare of the discrep-ancy and contested aspects of our ownership. We contended that a parkj-ng easement across the front of our property and a pedestrian easement on the west side of our property was not for the use of Flussheim, they contended it was- for their exclusive use.
fn the past three years our titl_e company has been negotiat-ing with the regal representation of Flussheirn cond6miniurn Association and our regal council to come to an equitabre so-lution.
The comprornise agreed upon allows for a pedestrian easement on the west side of our property, for Flussheim, s use, that is two feet wider than the original easernent. To parcel A's benefit the new plat removes any reference of a parking ease-ment for Flussheim from the front of the property and also states that it is not subject to the I'russheim DeLraration .
PLAT. DOC
Additionally it was discovered during this somewhat lengthy process that there are significant surveying discrepancies
between the original plat and curent surveys. The original Flussheim Townhomes plat, that was filed prior to construc-tion of t,he townhomes themselves, indicated that aII the party and exterior wal-ls were located on the respective tract boundaries.
In fact the townhouse party walls do not sit within their le-gal description, per current surveys, and the easternmost townhouse laps our property line l-.5 to 2.5' depending on which survey you refer to. After lengthy inwestigation we have determined this situation night have been brought about
lV ?" improvement in surveying teehniques and possibly by the builder not locating the construction accurately. the- new townhouse plat submitted locates the townhouse tiact bound-aries on the townhouse party walls.
The property boundary description of both parcel A and parcel
B is as it was on the original 1970 plat of Lot 2, Block 5,Inter:rnountain Subdivis ion.
The property boundary between the parcel A and B on the nelv minor subdivision and townhouse plat is ident,icar to the one described on the survey we submitted for Eagle County plan-ning review in 1985 and to the Town of Vail in lggg for a zone change, variance and design review. Therefore there is no - change to Parcel A or B's allowable GRFA or appticable setbacks. The original property survey of parcel Cprepared in L985 and the nevr townhouse and minor subdi-vision prat-pre-pared in 1989 are by Intermountain Engineering.
In concLusion this new plat accomplishes several goals:
1. Establishes a functional pedestrian access to the rear apartments of the Flussheim townhomes.
2. Establishes Parcel A and B as mut,ua11y independent of any covenants or declarations running with either property for the exception of the pedestrian easement.
3. Relocates townhouse tract boundaries on the existing party walls.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Lynn Fritzlen
pIat. doc
List of Property Owners
AdJacent to Lot 2, Block 5, fntermountain Subdivisi
Lot 5, Block 6, Interzrountain Subdivision ilose Portrundo
?98 Curtiswood Wrive
Key Biscayne Florida 33149
Lot 7, Block 6, Intermountain Subdivision
Jarnes Hayhurst
2365 Skyfarm Drive Hillsborough CA 94010
Lot 8, Block 5, Intermountain Subdivison David A. and Leslie Danielson
5078 Canal Drive Lakeworth Florida 33463
Lot 9, Block 5, Intermountain Subdivision Angelo M. Daurio, Edward Beauvais
Occhiatotabow Develotrrment,
2208 E. Missouri Ave.
Phoenix Arizona 85014
Lot 3r4r5 Block 5, Intermountain Subdivision Interlochen Condominiums Judy Sullivan Association president
2937 S. Forest St.Denver CO 80222
Lot 1, Block 5, fntermountain Subdivision Ste!,rart Paul Vollst.edt
3303 Belleflower vail 81657
platl.doc
A.
B.
}ATE 12/718e
APPLICATION FOR
CONDOMiN IUM/TOWNHOUSE PLAT REVIEW
APPLICANT Flusshein Townhones
ADDRESS c/o Charlotte Ellinger Walter, 3f85 S. Hills Ct. Denver 80210
orL Fritzlen POB 57' Vail 81658 pH6NE 476-6342
NAME OF
MAILING
NAME OF APPLICANT'S
MAILING ADDRESS POB
REPRESENTATM Lynn Fritzlen
57 Vail Co 81658
PHINE 476-6342
C. NAME OF
Ol.lNER 'S
MAILING
PROPERTY
SIGNATURE
0WNER (print or
see sagned
Alan McDonaLd, Charlotte Walter, Lawrence
type) Hoffer. charles Park Julian Quatlebaum IfI
-1 ^ F PH0NE 476-6342
ADDRESS see above
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
Portion of
L 0T__2_BL0C K__5_SUB D I V I S I 0N_lage4qsleli!FILING
E.
F.
FEE $'100.00 PA1D__!/4!Z__
MATERIALS TO BE SUBMITTED
l. Three (3) copie_s, two of_which_qy:!.bg mylars of a site map requirements of Section 17.16.130(C) 1,2,3,4,6,7,g,9,.l0,.|.|;
the Subdivision Regulations.
fol I owing
I 3 and '14
the ,, '
of
2. The condominium or townhouse p'l at
and cross-sections as necessai^y to ' and/or other ownerships and if the ' as the approved p1ans.
shall a'l so include floor p1ans, elevations accurate'ly determine individual air spaces project was bui'lt substantially the slme
G.
3. A copy of the condominium documents for . are maintenance provjsions included for
APPROVAL PROCESS, REVIEI,I CRITER]A
These can be found in Chapter 17.22 of the
FILING AND RECORDING
staff review to assure that there all commonly owned areas.
Subdiv jsion Regul ations.
pl at so
prompt'ly
The zoning adm'inistrator shall be the final signature required on the that the Department of community Development wit'l oe responsible for recording the approved piat with the Eagle county clerk ind Recorder.
{(
iv
H.
Project Application
Pro.ject Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:V,l ! l--iep ce 476 - b34Z
Architect. Address and Phone:
Legal Descri
Comments:
/at,l o{
ption: Lot I ol 2-Block riting l/R:l fxlcf mou,''la,nl , zo^" P/7
,
Design Review Board
--T-l
o^t" 5'3/ 'Y7
DISAPPROVAL ,'nppnovaL,')
Summary:
/"i,:1 =h/14 '_=
Town Plan ner
Date:5,31,Y1
E statt Approval
O rl,,"l ?\
resolut'i on with the wording change in H. was made by Tom Steinberg and seconded by
Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal . A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimous'ly 4-0.
The next agenda item was theSober!,-liqn-request for a front setback varjance and
modi fj cati 6n of the 100-year ITII-Tieek fl oodpl ai n (342 Mi I I Creek Ci rcl e ) . Mi ke
Mollica explained the applicant's two requests, then reviewed the crjteria used in
these reouests. He stated staff recommended approval of the variance request
because it would create a hardship on the applicant if it was not granted. As far
as the floodplain modification, staff recommended approval with three conditions:
1. That a perm'i t from the Army Corps of Engineers, either and Individua'l or a
Nationwide Permjt, be obtained prior to the issuance of any building
permit for the ProPertY.2. That approval from the Federal Emergency Management Agency be secured
prior to the issuance of any building permit for the property.
3. That a groundwater analysis be completed, as an addendum to the EIR, pri or
to the issuance of any bujlding permit for the property. Said analysis
Shall conclude that there will be no adverse affect on adjacent, properties
regarding the issue of groundwater.
He then noted the Plannjng and Envi ronmental Commission recommended unanimous
approval of the stream modification and the front setback variance. Mike then
stated the 250 square foot request was tabled untiI the next PEC meeting at the
applicant's request. The PEC was opposed to the applicant's 250 request and was
about to motion for denial of the 250 request when the applicant requested tabling;
the PEC voted unanimously for tabling. He then read a letter from Mr. Higbie
opposing the stream modification and noted he had received letters ear'l ier from two
others in favor of the stream modificatjon. Mayor Rose commented the Council called
this issue uD to discuss and understand it more. Jim Morter of Morter Architects'
representing the applicant, felt the 250 square foot request could be put to rest
because nothing cou'l d be done until the applicant went through the Design Review
Board. He stated the applicant would be within the alIowed GRFA without requesting
the additional 250 square feet, but they did want the abi]ity to go through the DRB.
Council had some discussion on the 250 GRFA. Tom Steinberg stated he would only
agree to approval if the applicant agreed not to app'l y for the additional 250 square
feet before the five year limit. Jim Morter stated the applicant did not need the
250 square feet and was within the GRFA allowed. Larry Eskwith explained what the
250 ordinance would al'l ow; there was more discussjon. Jim Morter reviewed the
problems of build'i ng on the lot and how jt came about. He remarked why it was a
hardship and showed how they would change the stream flow; he then reviewed the
relocated creek and how'i t would be improved. Bil'l Ruzzo discussed the technical
aspects of moving the creek. He stated they had turned in the report and analysis
to Mike Mollica this evening for the first and third conditions required by staff.
Regarding the second conditjon, FEMA approval , they were in the process of making
app'l ication at this time. They had met with the Region Director in Denver and had
submitted the required forms. TechnicalIy, the appl icant was not encroaching into
the 100-year f1 oodplain, but they wiII proceed for the map f ine revision due to the
creek relocation. He asked Council to change the condition so as not to depend on
approval for a building perm'i t. Mike Mollica agreed; they would change to an
occupancy permit instead of a building permit. There was some discussion of a
sediment prob'l em during constructjon, to which Mike Ruzzo responded. Jim Monter
commented Mrs. Gunn wanted it in the record that any trees damaged for a period of
up to three years after the construction (as a result of the construction) wjll be
replaced. A motion was made by Ga'i 'l Wahrlich-Lowenthal to approve the request for a
front setback variance and modification of the 100-year floodplain because of
staff's findings that this will not grant a special privilege and will not injure
the public's health; a] so, the variance is warranted because the strict
interpretation of the guidelines would produce a hardship for the applicant; a1 so,
that approval be granted in accordance with the staff recommendations in their
memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated April 24, 1989, except
to modify condition no. 2 to change the wording from a building perm'i t to an
occupancy permit. The motion was seconded by John Slevin. A vote was taken and the
motion passed unanimously 4-0. Tom Steinberg asked staff to bring back the 250
ordinance for evaluation. After some discussion, it was decided to review general
GRFA items at the next Council Work Session. Gai'l suggested Council needed to do
site visits to identify what's right and wrong, and do it when all seven Council
members were here. Staff agreed thjs would be addressed sometime in June.
Thefourthorderofbus.inesswasth@ppea1oftheP1anningand
Environmental Commission decision to deny a side setback variance request (2998
(-
-2-
South Frontage Road tlest). Mike Mollica reviewed the chronological events up to
n0w:
1. A variance request was approved by the PEC on January 23, 1989, to allow
this property to be considered for rezoning by the Town council. The
approved variance was for a 6,620 square foot shortage in the minimum lot
size of the Primary,/Secondary Residential zone district-
2. The Town Council approved a rezoning request, from RC to P/S on March 7,
1989, Thjs rezoning has allowed for the addition of a secondary, rental
un'i t on the lot.
3. The PEC, on March 27,1989, unanimously voted (7-0) to deny the
applicant's side setback variance request. The PEC found that the request
would be a grant of special privilege and that the applicant's stated
hardshjp was self-imposed.
Mjke then reviewed the criterja and findings staff used in consideration of thjs
request. Staff and the PEC had a problem determining the physical hardship and felt
approving the request would be a grant of specjal pri vilege. Staff recommended
denial , and the PEC voted unanimously 7-0 for denjal . He then presented photographs
of the residence to Council. William Pierce, the owner and applicant, explained
exactly where the stair would be located and its uses; he also discussed why the
other alternatives would not be as acceptable. There was some discussion on the
alternat'i ves and why staff felt there was no physical hardship. John Slevin felt
this was a special sjtuation not normally shared with others and therefore could be
approved on this basis. After some discussion, Mike Mollica stated no other areas
were real'ly affected, but the PEC very clearly felt there were other options. He
djscussed what options the PEC felt were available, but the Council generaltV {id
not agree with the PEC's declsion. John S'l ev'in made a motion to overturn the PEC's
deniai decision regarding the side setback vaniance request with findings in.Section
4 of the Community Development report, and more specifically, the exceptions/special
condjt'i ons that apply to this applicant. Tom Steinberg seconded the motion. A vote
was taken and the motion passed unan'imously 4-0.
The next item was a Landmark Condominium sign vaniance request. Betsy Rosolack
remarked the Landmark was requesting a third sign (two are permitted) for a total of
24 square feet of signage (20 square feet are permitted). She stated they wanted
the third sign for the east sjde; they have two already, and this third sign would
result in a iotal of four extra square feet. She reviewed the criteria and findings
used by staff jn studying th'i s request, and noted staff supported the request for
the third sign and the 4.3 addition square feet. Betsy also commented the Design
Revjew Board recommended unanimous approval 5-0 for the variance request. After a
short discussion by Council, Gajl Wahrlich-Lowenthal made a motion to approve the
sign variance request in accordance wjth the findings of the staff memorandum dated
May t6, 1g99. John Slevin seconded the motion. A vote was'taken and the motion
passed unanimously 4-0.
There was no Citizen Participation.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
Respectful 1y submitted,
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
Minutes taken by Brenda Chesman
-3-
t'
:.
ir,
l. 5'
TO: Vail Town Council
FRoil: Comrnunity Developrnent Departnent
DATE: $ay 16, 1989
SURIECT: The applicants have reguested an appeal of a PEC decision
which resulted in the denial of thelr variance request.
The origrinal request was for a side setbask variance to the )prirnary/Secondary Residential zone district in order to construct an additlon to a residence on Lot 2, Block 5,
Inertmountain Subdivisi-on.Applicants: Willian Pierce and Lynn Fritzlen
I. DESCRIPTTON OF VARTANCE REQUESfED
The applicapts are owners of Lot 2, Block 5 of the Vail
Intermountain Subdivision, which is situated inmediately east of the Flussheim Townhouses and west of the Interloclren
Condoul.niurns. A single faurily dwelllng of 21534 square feet is Iocated on the lot.
The applicants are requestinE a varl.ance fron ttre side setback
requirenent to allow for the construction of a Etair tower on
the east side of the existing structure. The purpose of the stair is to provide access to a secondary, rental unit whictr is
proposed over the garage area. The variance request is for a 4 foot encroachnent into the required 15 foot side yard setback.
II. CHRONOI,oGY
A, A variance reguest was approved by the PEC on January 23,
1989, to allow this property to be considered for rezoning
by the Town Council . The approved variance r/as for a 6,620
equare foot slrortage in the minfunuro lot slze of tbe
Prinary/Secondary Residential zone diEtrict.
B. The Town Council approved a rezoning reguest, fron RC to
P/S on ltarch 7, 1,989. This rezoning has allowed for the addition of a secondary, rental unit on the lot.
C. The PEC, on ltarch 27, 1.989, unanimously voted (7-o) to deny the applicant's side setbaclc variance request. the PEC
found that the reguest would be a grant of special privilege and that the applicant's stated hardship was
self-inposed.
III. CRITERIA AND FTNDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Findlngs, Section 18.62.060 of the
municipal code, the Departrnent of Conurunity Developnent
reconmends denial of the reguested variance based upon the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
The relationship of the requested variance to other existinq or potential uses and structures in the vicinitv.
B.
The addition of a stair tower in the proposed location shouLd not creare any probrens to exilii;s-;; iJilnriar uses or structures in ttre vicinity. The iropeiiy-roo=t likely to be affected would be thE fnterl6ch6n Condorniniums to the east, on which a parlcing lat and a distance of 100 feet exists between tie appii"i"t",st'ructure and the nearest rnterloch"n resiirentiai-building.
Staff has been unable to deternine -a physical hardship regarding this variance reguest and tleis-irrat--iiirovar
:I.jl:^::sue:t wourd constftute a granr or specili prJ-vrrege. we aJ.so feel that the ipplicant iras n"t given fulr consideration to otrrei aliiqn "oruiions ror access into the secondary unit whicir *6ura-n"i-ieiuir"a variance.
c.
Staff finds signif,icant that the requested effect upon any of variance will have no the above consi.derations
rV. FINDINGS
That the granting of the variance will not constiture a grant,of. speciar privilege inconsisiJni with the iiroiiiiions on other properties classified in the sarne aistrict. -
ffat tltg.granting of the variance wilr not be detrirnental to the public health, safety or weiiare, or rnateriarry injurious to properties or improveienrs in ttre'viciniit:----
That the variance is warranted for one following reasons:
ecti.ves of
or more of the
The strict or literal interpretation or enforcement of !|g_:p.glfied regulation would result in practi-ii difficurty or unnecessary.physicar rraraship inconsistent with the objectives of thil titfe.
The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive ttre appiicint of p.rivileges.enjoyed by the owners of othei-properties in the sane district.
I'STAFT RECOMMENDATTON
Staff recommendation is for denial encroachnent into the side setback.identify a physical hardship, staff applicants, request.
of, the requested 4 foot Wlthout being able to cannot support the
ntt ^
Vrte
+5ou
.:i
- ;c - 1-o'
_->.* d!a-ta4,- FE C
r*ut< ffi ,ru.u,;-t4 l/
a
There are exceptions or extraordinary circunstances ol c-onditions apprlcabre to the sarne siie of trre viiianc"that do not apply generally to other propertles in tne sane zone.
qrc IaT
o
iNDtAre= Ext*. .\t-Ftl Fnr)Aftf4rcJ-"t>EiF
'.\5PHALT' p+F.tN6,
11 @7ttqw
FGTA,|N|Nat&
?TqE C7"tt't
L..v=+lGR-+
i\ \r'r't+<5
V,ti \ "T-ov., u- (' ot e<ct lipr It,. tTt 1 .l
"":X; (_,
Counci I dec ided to
retu rnecl .
tr,/,"O-f,
proceed with the following jtems on the agenda unt.i I pam
The next item was @ Commission decision-toZeny a siiE setbacr
Council to please table the jtem until the
appiicants were .not present for an unknown
table the item, which was seconded by Mire
moti on passed unanimously 7-0.
appeal of the Planning and Environmental
vari ance request. Mike-Mql 1ira asked
appl i cants coul d be-TiEiEn-TTithe
reason. Eric Affeldt made a motion to
Cacioppo. A vote was taken and the
Under Citizen Participation, Lew Meskiman asked if the Village Core closure of 11:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m. could possibly be not effective unti1 mid-May. Mayor Rose repljeo that staff would look into it.
Merv Lapin questioned where staff stood in regards to the point of sale tax. Ron Phillips explained they were waiting for legislation to take place which might affect catalog sales. Eric Affeldt commented the Supreme Court was also supposed to look at the issue sometime this spring. Merv remarked he would like to go ahead and proceed without catalog sales.
Council then recessed to listen to the last Evening Meeting's tapes.
The meeting then proceeded. The tapes reflected Mike Cacioppo did include a time
frame of 60-90 days from that Aprjl 4 to hold a local election. Possible dates were
then discussed to hold the election. There lvas then discussion regarding changing the time frame and the problems with it. Council had much discussion on possib1e
election dates, working with Heritage negotiations, and the County Commissioners'vote. Eric Affeldt made a motion to rescind the motion made by Mike Cacioppo at the April 4, 1989 Evening Meeting regarding the TV translator issue. John Slevin
seconded the motion. Larry Eskwith explained that a 2/3 majori ty vote was necessary to rescind action at a previous meeting without the item on the agenda according to
Roberts Rules of Order. Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal commented she would vote no because
she felt they were playing the two ends against the middle. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-2, with Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal and Mike Cacioppo opposing.Eric Affeldt then made a motion to inform the County Commissioners that Vail would not file a formal opposjtion at this time, and Council intends to call a vote of VaiI resident voters with a date yet to be determined. Tom Steinberg seconded.
Mike Cacioppo thought some people might feel this was a delay tactic. He felt tne deiay was in the best interest of Heritage, but he wou] d vote for this if a date deadline was set. Tom Steinberg commented he wanted to wait until the County
Commissioners were forced to make a decision before VaiI holds an election. Mike
Cacioppo commented he was against this because it would stop the district tonighr,to which Tom reiterated his previous comment. After more discussion by Councii, a vote was taken and the motion passed 4-3, with Gail wahrlich-Lowenthal , Mike
Cacioppo, and Mayor Rose opposing.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
Respectful 1y submitted,
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
Minutes taken by Brenda Chesman
-2-
.- R[,90 APR - 5 m tt htratest o.o.box5?tail colonado 81658
4?6 6943
April 1, 1989
Town Council
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road l'l.
Vai'l , C0 81657
RE; Appeal of Planning Corrnission Decis'ion
Denying Side Setback Variance
Fri tz] en/Pierce Resi dence
I ^+ t alarlz E ll:'i'l Tr.+zsv.rnnrrn*:in Lvl, a-r , ts. t .r.
Council Members:
As the applicant, I would
Commission that resulted in
the decision of the Planning
variance application at their
me regarding dates for my appeal
like to appeal
denial of my
Please contact
1i am Pi erce
TO:
FROM!
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning and Environmental Commission
Comrnunity Development Department
lllarc.tr 27 , L989
A request for a side setback variance to the prinary/
Secondary Residential zone district in order to construct an addition to a residence on Lot 2, Block 5,Intermountain Subdivis ion.Applicants: William Pierce and Lynn Fritzlen
I.DESCRTPTION OF VARTANCE REQUESTED
The applicants are owners of Lot 2, Block 5 of the Vail Intermountain Subdivision, which is situated im:nediately east of the Flussheim Townhouses and west of the Interlochen Condominiums. A single farnily dwelling of 2,534 square feet is located on the lot.
The applicants are reqllesting a variance frorn the side setback requirenrent to allow for the construction of a stair tower on the east side of the existing structure. The purpose o! the stair is to provide access to a secondary,rental unit which is proposed over the garage area. Tha variance request is for a 4 foot encroachnent into the required L5 foot side yard setback.
II. CHRONOLOGY
A.A variance reguest was approved by ttre pEC on January 23, L989, to allow this property to be considered for rezoning by the Town Council. The approved variance was for a 6,620 square foot shortage in the urinimum lot size of the Primary/Secondary Residential zone district.
The Town Council approved a rezoning request. from RC to P/S on March 7, 1989. This rezoning has allowed for the addition of a secondary, rental unit on the lot.
A. Consideration of Factors:
The ationshi of the ested variance to other exist
B.
IIT. CRITERTA AND FTNDTNGS
Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section l_8.62.060 of the municipal code, the Department of Community Development recommends denial 0f the requested variance based upon the following factors:
vicinity.or uses and structures e
The addition of a stair tower in the proposed location should not create any problems to existing or potential
uses or structures in the vicinity. The property rnost likely to be affected would be the Interlochen
Condominiums to the east, on which a parking lot and a distance of l-0O feet exists between the applicants,structure and the nearest fnterlochen residential building.
treatment amonct sites the vicin or to attain the obiectives of th without nt of special privileqe.
Staff has been unabl-e to determine a physicat hardship regarding this variance request and feels that approval of the request would constitute a grant of special privilege. we also feel that the applicant has not given fulL consideration to other design solutions for access into the secondary unit which would not require a variance.
The effegt of the requested variance
facilities, public facil-ities and utilities, and public
safety.
Staff finds that the requested variance will have no significant effect upon any of the above considerations.
Such other factors and criteria as the connission deerns applicable to the proposed variance.
IV. FTNDINGS
The Plann and Environmental Commission shall make the followinq findj-nqs before qrantinq a variance:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the linitations on other properties classified in the sane district.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or naterially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for one or rnore of the following reasons:
B.
c.
The deqree to which relief frorn the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified requlation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformitv of
The strict or literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regrulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of tlre variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the
same zone.
The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the osrners of other properties in the same district.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATTON
Staff reconmendation is for denial of the requested 4 foot
encroachrnent into the side setback. Without being able to identify a physical hardship, staff cannot support the applicants' request.
CA,/- ,h{t*;- h /*-J / qZ re*'-
\-o
lntratect p.o.borr 5?irail colorado
816s8 4?6 6g4a lz/q /aa Veu,4*as €eaue*
Fpl rzLE N / ftare .W2/tE\Ez
Lar Z.) Er-acz. 5) V'+iz- /a1r=te-rnasntrA)N
Lr-or 6p. fip.t+aepr fe-ree-ry Au^te,ez;
J'or d, 6zacz- 6, V*o /ur-rcnau/\/T-+/^J
rJoue &er'aNDo
7"8 Ccterldt.tcnr> {k .
lzEV ,&tee'a/NEt FL. 3e/47
b- 7 pza&, 6, VA)u /*treerreuntr,+it,t
"hrneo ilaytuqSr ze6o fu.yp*e,ln .k.
r4tu'=mPu6H.t CA a4on
Urvtr 5, FLU*eHelrn Eut*ttA(ffie
Aeeapcu> l/oua[*ta Qre,q,
5qE tr44szaN 4v=-
NY, NY. /oaze.
/rgrezl-,ocDe,xt Gpaal,-t /M/ urrT 4=€t t^J.
JuoV eu_z-t-t vAt ! ) kE€.2qO7 5, Fap,w-ec
OetvUee-J Ca. Bazaz-
February 24, t989
FRITZLENiPIERCE RESIDENCE
VARIANCE REQUEST
EAST SETBACK - PROJECTION OF STAIR
NATURE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED
The applicants request a variance to the required setback on the east side
of their property in order to construct a stair. The purpose of this stair is to provide access to the space that currently exists above the garage.
The applicants propose to convert the portions of thjs exl sting space (with
adequate headroom) into an'employee apartment'of approximately 350 sq. ft.
Existjng space with linli ted headroonr would serve as storage for the existing
residence and the apartment. The stair wiil provide separate outside access to the apartnrent, access from the apartment to the garage, mechanical and
electrical equipment, and access from the existing residence to storage
remaining above the garage.
The proposed stair is covered, but unenclosed and extends 7'6" east of the
existing structure. The actual setback from the existing structure in this
area is 16'(15' is the required setback). Based on the setback allowances in the supplemental regulations, an encroachment of 30" wou'l d be granted by
approvai of the requested variance.
The applicant has careful 1y studies all other possible solutions for access
and considers the proposed stair the only practical solution to access to the aoartment.Numerous access reoui rements render other sol uti ons
disfunctional . Interior access possibilities would require loss of nearly
as much space as would be available in the apartment. 0ther exterior stair
solutions would require redesign of significant portions of the existing roof rendering the cost of the apartment impractical , or would require
encroachment 'i nto the setbacks to avoid the existing overhang.
As stated in previous submissions, the apartment will be subject to
requirements of 18.13.080 (B). It is the stated policy of the Town of Vai'l to encourage such Employee Housing and to positively consider minor
variances to accomplish sar'd housing units. It is the appiicant's opinion
that this request is reasonable based upon the above considerations. Please
note that all other development standards are vli thin the zoning guidelines.
REQUIRED STATEMENTS
1) Relationship to Existing or Potential Uses or Structures - The addition is proposed in a location adjacent to a large parking lot
on the property to the east providing nearly 100 feet between exr'sting buildings. The density on the adjacent properties exceeds current
Town of Vail standards, suggesting that the chances for potential
additional development are slim. The appiicant suggests that granting of the requested variance wil I have no significant impact on any
adjacent use or structure.
o
Compatibility and Unifomity of Treatnent
tback encroachments.
Light, Air, Distribution of Population, Transportation, Etc.Tffi
lntratest
ro.o.borrS??ail colorado
8r.658
2)
a)
I.This
will
AJ
procedure is required
not be accepted unti l
requesting a variance.is submitted.
The appllcrtlon
lltllertlr
PEC !'IEETIII6
APPL ICATI FOR A VARIANCE
for 1ny project all lnformation
DlYr ? ')'7.79
NAI',IE OF APPLICANT
ADDRESS
NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESE
ADDRESS
| !'i:)
B.
wrc47bl*z
ATIVE { . 147.'2 ,1 1=-
p
il il
c. NA||tt 0F ol,/NE
s
ADORESS
. LOCATION OF PROPOSAI
ADDRESS
E. FEE $IOO PAID
THE FEE MUST 8E PAID
YOUR PROPOSAL.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION tOfZ *OC I rlLlNG lN t&'-matt r**t
FROM
I
K>
cK#
-
BTFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OEPARTMEI{T I{ILL ACCEPT
III. FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FOLLO}.III{G INUST AE SUBI4ITTEO:
A. A I'/RITTEN STATFIIENT 0F THE PIECTSE NATURE 0F THE VARIANCE REquEsrED ArD THE REGULATION INVOLVED. THE STITEf'4ENI MUST ALSO ADORESS: --T---'-- "J
l. The relationship of the rpquested variance to othaf existing or pc._r.r:r.il uses and structures in ttie vicinity.
2. The degree to
and unlfonnit
edforcement of
-li:!^::Jlf lryl.,ilg strict or literal interprctailon and '!i:lls- "H*'l?r,l', :':::':ll,!r^l;ii{i';,i;iiriiTrty sites in-+te-+ ihni+y on_to ;6ii;'il1
ll'l
rIii
I
lr
Lh,jl
rl
obJectives o titlr hithour sranr or speitii-piiiif.g..
MINUTES
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
FEBRUARY 21, 1989
7:30 P.M.
MFMRFNS DRFSFNT:
A regular meeting of the Vail Town Councjl
at 7:30 p-m. in the Council Chambers of the
was held on Tuesday, February 21, 1989,
Vail Municipal Building.
Rose- Mavor Ke nt
6g4A /z/q /az V*ur4*as €eare{
Fp.ITaLEN /frere.ffi/e\@ lar Z) Ecacz, 5) V,+it- /pre.rna.rNrA/N
LreroF z,M,/aa:*tr feoeery A^tuere
Lor 6, Ezacl/. e ) V,+,c- /NTry<nauNT*/^J
r,/oee P&ruapea
77A Ccteri4ttuo &,kEy ,&t<=caYNEt FL, A9/47
T 7 Pzar/z 6., VHu /*t@zreuntraiut
v"bzz>r:G Hryftueir ze65 *yrae,rn .k.,
r4tu-cruezu.Ht CA a4o/o
Urtltr 5, FL tree Hetrn Eut*tt+Lffie
5qE Maeap 4v=.
NY, NY, /oaze
/rgreelac fiEN Capea,u /N/ urrl .4es'nt.
Juev euturvANl, €eze.2qO7 5, Fep,#er;
O=ntVeet Ca. Sozaz-
c
4
Arpry<'e y'buat'rta @r.
\ 0l I
5//(u
r;i
r-uuR (4) CoPIEs 0F THE
A. A Llp ITTFN CTATEMCNT
,t 1ll't
FOLLOl,lING I,IUST BE SUBMITTED:
nE TUf nnr^lcr Nlt?llnr nr ?.rc
7
t.l
t?.
a\
. r-l
Lr
There bejng no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m-
Respectfu'l 1y submitted,
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
Minutes taken by Brenda Chesman
-2-
)
ORDINANCE NO.
Series of 1-989
AN ORDINANCE RE-ZONING A PARCEL OF
LOT 2, BLOCK 5, VAIL INTERMOUNTAIN
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TN REI,ATION TO
PROPERTY.
ffiT,
t44
I
I
i
\5\
PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS
SUBDIVISION, AND AMENDING THE
THE RE_ZONTNG OF SAID
WHEREAS, the property to be re-zoned is located within the
municipal lirnits of the Town of Vail ,' and
WHEREAS, there is an application from the property owner of
Loi- 2, Block 5, Vail Intermountain Subdivision, for re-zoning
said parceli and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environrnental Commission has
considered the appropriate re-zoning for the property and has
unanimously reconmended that the Town Council re-zone the parcel
frorn Residential Cluster to Primary/Secondary Residential; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the public
interest to re-zone said property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF VArL, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section L.
The Town Council finds that the procedures for the provision of
re-zoning property in the Town of Vail have been fu1fi11ed, and
the Town Council hereby received the report of recornmendation of
the Planning and Environmental commission recommending the re-
zoning of said property.
Section 2.
Pursuant to Sections L8.56.L00 - 18.66.1-80 of the Vail Municipal
Code, a parcel of property described as Lot 2, Block 5, Vail
Intermountain Subdivision, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado
is zoned as Prirnary/Secondary Residential.
Section 3.
As provided in the ordinances of the Town of Vail, the zoning
admi-nistrator is hereby directed to rnodify and amend the
official zoning rnap to include the zoning specified in Section 2
above.
Section 4.
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of
this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such
decision shalL not affeet the validity of the rernaining portions
of this ordinancei and the Town Council hereby declares it would
have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsectJ-on,
sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that
one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or
phrases be declared invalid.
Section 5.
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this
ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and
welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof.
Section 6.
The repeal or the repeal and re-enactment of any provisions of
tbe Vail Municlpal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not
affect any right which has accrued, any duty irnposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any
prosecution conmenced, nor any other action or proceeding as
commeneed under or by virtue of the provision repealed or
repealed and re-enacted. The repeal of any provision hereby
shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously
repealed or superseded unless expressly stated. herein.
INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS of
, 1989, aDd a public hearing shal} be held on this
ordinance on the day of , L989 at 7:30 p.n.
in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, VaiI,
Colorado. Ordered published in full this day of
t_989.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer. Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED this _ day of , 1989.
Kent R. Rose, lllayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Tolvn Clerk
Co..*..X
To: ission
FRoM: Comrnunity Development Department
7. zt,F1 DATE: +afi*ar1r_}3-7_4989
SUBJECT: A request to rezone a O.32 acre parcel of land frorn the current Residential Cluster zone district to the
Prinary/Secondary Residential zone district.Applicant: William Pierce/Lynn Fritzlen
I. THE REQUEST
The applicants are the owners of Lot 2, Block 5 of the VaiI Intermountain subdivision, which is situated irnmediately east of the Flussheim Townhouses and west of the Interlochen Condominiurns. A single family dwelling of
2,534 square feet is located on the lot.
The intent of this rezoning request is to allow the applicants to construct a small secondary, rental unit over the existing garage, The secondary unit would consist of a studio apartment of approximately 35O square feet, and the applicants have agreed not to sell, transfer, or convey the
secondary unit separately from the prinary unit. Also,the secondary unit shall be rented only to full-tirne
employees in the Upper Eagle Valley for periods of 30 days or more.
The current RC zoning on the property allows for a maximum of only one dwelling unit. The proposed P/S zone district allows for only one unit by right. However, Iots of less than L5,000 square feet in the Prirnary/Secondary zone district are allowed a secondary rental unit when the criteria in Section 18.L3.08O (B) of the zoning code (criteria for lots under L5,000 sqluare feet to allow a
secondary unit) are met.
The following table compares the requirements and standards of the current R/C zoning with the proposed P/S zoning:
Current Zoninq Proposed Zoninq
Zone District RC
Allowable Dwetling Units I P/s
L +l- enployee unit
Minimum Lot Size L5,000 sf 1-5,OOO sf
Maximum GRFA
Setbacks
Front
Sides/Rear
Maximum Height
3 r 520 sf 3,520 sf
20'
L5t
33'
20t
L5t
33,
II. EVALUATTON OF THIS REQUEST
A. Criteria #1. Suitability of Proposed Zoninq
The rfbuildable areatr of this lot is severely restricted by existing easements and floodplain.Approximately 51700 square feet of this 14,080 square foot lot is located within the Gore Creek floodplain,thereby reducing the 'rbuildable arearr of the tot to
8 , 380 sqluare feet.
The existing single-fanily residence maintains a 25 foot rninimurn setback frorn the L00-year floodplain.Construction of a secondary unit over the garage area would ensure protection of the floodplain while Iiniting new construction within the existing building footprint.
The rezoning, as proposed, would meet all of the
Town's development standards of the Primary/Secondary
zone district with the exception of the rninirnurn lot area requirernent. A variance from this reguirenent
has been applied for and
j&--
eviewed as-a 4 ^-;;;;; ;;q";t.H q
,l/,a ,a^ y'e" "Et
B.Criteria #2. fs the amendment proposal presentinq a convenient, workable relationship amonq land uses consistent with municipal obiectives?
The Primary/Secondary designation is consistent with
adjacent Prirnary/Secondary zoned properties
inmediately south of Gore Creek and would also be
cornpatible with the existing character of the neighborhood. The requested rezoning is consistent with the following development goals in the Town's
Land Use PIan:
Policy 5.3 Affordable employee housing should be
made available through private efforts,assisted by limited incentives,provided by the Town of vail, with appropriate restrictions.
The existing ernployee housing base
should be preserved and upgraded.additional employee housing needs
should be accommodated at varied sites
throughout the eommuni-ty.
Policy 5.5
Policy 5.1: Additional residential growth should
continue to occur prinarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high
hazards do not exist.
c.Criteria #3.Does the rezo rovide fo rowth of an orderl and v tv?
The staff feels that this rezoning proposal does provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community. Enployee housing is in short supply in Vail and is a crucial elernent in Vail ,s continuing to be a viable resort comrnunity.
IIT. STAFF RECOMI{ENDATION
The staff recommendation for the rezoning of this l_ot to Prirnary/Secondary is for approval . We feel that the p/S
designation is the most appropriate zone district for the uses proposed and that the addition of an employee housing unit would be a positive contribution to the community.Moreover, the Land Use Plan specifically allows for these types of incentives or minor concessions to encourage the provision of additional employee housing units.
/ ott-
bt-74
?-o
Motion: Grant Riva - Move that request be approved as submitted wittr tinaGlE-iT no grant of special privileqe, no detriment to public health or welfare.
Second: Pam Hopkins
Vote: 3 - 3 (Note: A tie vote is deemed a denial)
4. Pierce,/FritzIe! - Rezoninq:
. Presentation by Mike Mollica. Recommendation for approval
based upon Land Use Plan, surrounding zoning and allowance
for an ernployee housing unit.
Motion: Diana Donovan -Move recommendation of approval per
staff memo.
Second: Sidnev Schultz
Vote: 6 - 0
5. Pierce/Fritzlen Variance to Minimum Lot Size:
Staff presentation by Mike Mo]Iica. Recommend approval,feels there is a benefit to adding an ernployee unit, with a condition that the Town Council approve the above
referenced re-zoning.
Motion: Donovan - Approve per staff memo, noting the conditions of approval .
Second: Pegqv osterfoss
Vote: 5 - 0
Sitzmark Lodqe Exterior Alteration:
Staff presentation by Mike Mollica. Recommendation for approval with condition that the existing large spruce tree
be relocated on site.
Duane Piper - Representing the applicant, made a brief presentation reqarding maintenance and space needs. The existing tree does need to be removed to accomrnodate the addition. The applicant wishes to expand the alpine garden
Iandscape concept and feels srnaller trees would compliment that type of landscaping better. With regard to parking
Duane feels that the creation of a new parking space by
removing the boiler should cover the required parking of the addition. Bob Fritch, the Sitznark owner spoke to the
Iandscaping issue.
Diana Donovan - Feels the building needs sone taLl vertical
landscape elenents. DRB should examine this.
6.
Peqqv Osterfoss - Seconded the rnotion.motion folLowed.
Discussion of the
Clarification of Motion:
Highway Departroent wants
Vote:3for, lagainst,
Until we (PEC) find out what the State
and will approve.
2 abstain
like clear direction as to what inforrnation the
should present.
this issue followed.
rnade to have a work session on this issue on
the previous McCue variance reguest, however,addition could be handled without this degree
encroachment.
Diana Donovan - Feels direction from council was that 250 squa;E-Eofrddition should not allow variances to this degree. Distance between buildings is too close.
Peqqy Osterfoss - Agree with Diana,s comments regarding the 250 sguare foot ordinance.
Grant Riva - Agrees with direction given from Council and staff, however, given attitude of neighbors and low impact,I would vote in favor of this.
Jim Viele - Agree with Grant for a little different reason.
Persuaded that variance criteria are being rnet so could vote for it.
Rav Mcllahan - Asked for a clarification of the PEC motion.
He would
hospital
Discussion of
presentation by Kristan Pritz. Staff recomrnends per staff memo regarding criteria and findings.
Robert McCue - Applicant and owner gave his presentation
requesting approval , A11 neighbors agree that the variance will improve property values in the area. None are opposed. This is not a special privilege, many adjacent
hornes already have many additions.
BiIl Pierce - Property was zoned while in Eagle county,
annexed to Town, and may not be properly zoned. Deck
encroachment is not visible except to adjacent owners who have no problem.
Sidnev Schultz - Apparently I was not present at PEC during do feel that of
.----4 I
F
To: Planning and Environmental Commission
FRoM: Community Development Department
DATE: January 23, 1989
SUBJECT: A request for a variance from the minimurn lot area
requirement of the Primary/Secondary Residential zone
district for Lot 2, Block 5, Intermountain Subdivision.
Applicants: Willian Pierce/Lynn Fritzlen
I. DESCRIEIION OF VARIANCES REQUESTED
The applicants are the owners of Lot 2, Block 5 of the VaiI
Intermountain Subdivision, which is situated irunediately east
of the Flussheim Townhouses and west of the Interlochen
Condominiums. A single fanily dwelling of 2,534 square feet
is located on the lot.
The applicants are requesting a variance from the ninirnum lot
area of the Prls Residential zone district. This zone
district requires the minimum lot area to be 15'000 square
feet of rrbuildable area.rr Lot 2 has an overall size of
14,080 square feett however, when the area of the lot which
is included within the L0o-year floodplain (5,700 square
feet) is deducted from the overall size, the ttbuildable arearl
of the lot is reduced to 81380 square feet. Hence' the
applicants are reguestingr a variance of 6t62o square feet
fron the rninirnum buildable lot size.
Calculations:
14,080 sf = lot size
-5,7OO sf = floodplain
8,380 sf = buildable area
l-5,000 sf = ninimum lot area
-8,38O sf = buildable area
6,620 sf = variance request
II . CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060 of the municipal code, the Department of community Development
recommends approval of the reguested variance based upon the following factors:
Consideration of Factors:
The relationship of the requested variance to other
elciFtinq or potential uses and structures in the
vr-c].nrEY.
The requested variance, if approved, would enable the
applicants to add a secondary, rental unit to an
existing single family dwelIing. AIl development
standards of the P/S Residential zone district would be
rnet (i.e. setbacks, height, GRFA' parking, landscaping,
etc.) with the one exception of minimum lot area, for
which this variance is requested. An existing storage
area over the garage would be rernodeled into a studi.o
apartment, thereby negating the need to expand the
current building footprint.
The Department of community Development believes that
the requested variance would not adversely affect the
privacy or use of any adjacent properties with the
addition of a secondary unit on this lot. It should be
noted that the appli-cant could build an addition to the
existing unit, excluding a kitchen, which would have the
same bulk and rnass impacts as the proposed employee
housing unit.
The deqree to which relief from the strict. and literal
interpretation and enforcernent of a specified requlatj-on
is necessarv to achieve compatibilitv and uniforr.nitv of
treatrnent amonq si-tes in the vicinitv or to attain the
obiectives of this title qithout qrant of spec
privileqe.
The extensive areas of this lot which are included
within the 1o0-year floodplain have created a hardship
on the owners by restricting the allowable number of
dwelling units to one. The character of the
neighborhood is decidedly nulti-farnily on the north side
of Gore creek, and P/S Residential is the exclusive zone
district south of Gore Creek. Also, policies in the
Land Use Plan (see attached rezoning memo dated January
23, 1989) encourage the Town to give lirnited incentives
in trade for the construction of employee housing.
Staff feels that it would not be a grant of special
privilege in the granting of this variance request.
The effect of the requested variance on liqht and air,
ansportation and traffic
facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public
safetv.
B.
This variance reguest, if approved, would not block any
light or air on adjacent properties, as the-proposed
addition would be confined within the existing
structure.
The addition of a secondary unit on this lot would have
a negligible effect upon the distribution of population,
transportation, and traffic facilities in the area-
Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems
aDtrlicable to the proposed vari-ance'
III. FINDINGS
The Planninq and Envirqnmental Comrnission shall make the
;
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant
of speciai privilege inconsistent with the lirnitations on
other properties ctassified in the same district.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrirnental to
the publii health, safety or welfare' or materially injurious
to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the
following reasons:
The strict or literal interpretation or enforcement of
the specified regulation would result in practical
difficulty or unnecessary physical. hardship inconsistent
with the objectives of this title.
There are exceptions or extraord:i-nary circurnstances or
conditions applicable to the same site of the variance
that do not ipply generally to other properties in the
same zone.
The strict interpretation or enforcernent of the
specified regulation would deprive the applicant of
piivileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in
the sarne district.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATTON
Staff recommendation is for approval . The applicants have
shown that Lot 2 possesses unusual conditions (i.e.
extensive floodplain area and easements) and that a hardship
would be imposed upon the applicants if the strict interpretation of the code were to be enforced.
one condition of approval is:
That the To$rn council approve the applicants' rezoning
request from Residential Cluster to Primary/Secondary
Residential .
R d 4 .ft'x,l r
I tt "rt'1tn' ^r'D L'?cc -
-.oo
c*
q9
c
b$)
/4
UNIT
5
.rt.tjs$ngitd
TCl4&,b13u.$i119
i;'.iTT:,?j-Crd:,{5&
u'##t'$.{,tiiiiifild$
/
Thts cerllftcalr doGr noc conltl.ure a tttle eearch by rnter-Hounrah Engrne€rlnt Eo dGterdn'. orncrrhlp or alrc!€nBr of record. For eil r.nforearl.n ragardlng
'aa'u.nrr' rl'3hcr-ot-vey. or rlBr. of rceord, r" c"t-rao"i tiii- g"ri.."rrng rertcd uPon fho Finol plof of Voil Inlcrmo0ntoin Dcvelopmcnt Subdivision Block S.
/
.\
$
The approximate I imits plain of Gore Creek as
Floodplain Information"
Triad Ltd., of Lakewood
of the 100 year flood
defined in "Gore Creek
dated June,1975 by Hydro
Colorado have been plotted
u\\o
as a dashed line
PROXIMATE LIMITS
.t.:]:" *;
N0TICE: According to Colorado law, you must conmence
any.legal actlon based upon any defect in thls survey nltnin three years after you flrst dlscoyer such defect.
In-no event, may any actlon based upon such defect ln thls survey be comenced more than ten years fron the
date of the certiflcatlon shown hereon.
a od
f9
ed;
o?
i.GT
,sft{o
p.q!q 9?E
Arcl|\a.gfoLclGaco roiDa.a-!rt7?
t..CI VA'\EC S'F]EE'LAKlltrclEcri |-l -CPtll
Ird. r3toaD a:re-otra
t/E/88 A PART OF LOT 2, BLOCK 5,
VAIL. INTERIy&0UNT4N DEVEINPM ENT
EreLE @UNTY, COLORADO
\aa <,i
io -?;M -o+i 37,/(s
\\,
wooD DEcKs '/a-/ ./
:\
o $\
T ,, / -td o\
:l
t\\n,/" ,gi',,",-tl
G B \o :
"#6ioj*a
&/o r
I
0 g
Brion I Kel/y R.L.S. 24318
on this and ]abeled as "AP-
o\
t.
1
-t F.* I
L .t\r
N;-,v t\!$s \)f
\' ,\
\\-i
^l l\\
i ..\
\
?F.t..t
c
t
I
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the planning and Environmental
Commission of the Town of VaiI will hold a public hearing in
accordance with Section t-8.66.060 of the municipal code of the
Town of Vail on January 23t L989 at 3:OO PM in the Town of Vail
Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1. A reguest for a zone change from Residential Cluster to
Prinary/Secondary and a request for a variance frorn minirnum
lot size in order to construct a second dwelling unit on
I-,ot 2, Block 5, Vail Intermountain Subdivision.
Applicants: Williarn Pierce, Lynn Fritzlen
The applications and inforrnation about the proposals are
available in the zoning adninistratorrs office during regular
office hours for public inspection.
TOWN OF VAIL
COI,TMUNITY DEVEI.OPI,TENT DEPARTMENT
Published in the Vail Trail on January 6, i.989.
_/ ?gC' -\-nrl. T5, t7r1
retit j.f oare
PETITION FORM FOR .4.I\IEND}IENT TO
OR
A crrl.NGE ffit#8;_i8i
fft:^l'?.edure is-required for or .ior a request for a oi=tiiJt
A. NAi,lE OF PETTTIONER ;{
THE ZONIIIG OR.DII:ANCE
BOUNDARIES
{.any amendnent to .ooundaty change
/65
the zoning orCinance
I hhhF^ -frlr,,/ jI-L > 5
ADDRNSS
PETITTONER'S
c.NAI'IE OF OIJNE
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
D.LOCATION OF PROPOSTI,L
ADDRXSS "1fuo o+ar o/__LEGAL DEscR]?TIoN 1"i2 block
REPR5STNTIITVX .C_>ruN E
---..-.--
PE1NE476 63rb
PliONE
E.. rEE
F. A list
subj ect
$loo. oo PAID
"i-ll" names of orvners of propcrty, and thcir ,Jri*all property adjacent to addreSSeS.
vnoNr474, &4z
the
lt: ..
(0l/ER)
December 26, 1988
TOWN OF VAIL
Department of Community Development
75 S. Frontage Road
Vai l, C0 81657
RE: VARIANCE STATEMENT/ZONE CHANGE REQUEST
FRITZLEN/PITRCE RESIDENCE tot 2, Block 5, Vail Intermountain
2998 S. Frontage Road lrl., Vail, C0
Staff, Planning and Environmental Commission:
The purpose of this statement is to clarify the intent of the 0wners and address the issues as required for the variance request.
The 0wners currently occupy a single family residence on the above referenced property. The site is'l ocated in residential cluster zone distrjct and js
bordered on the east and west by multi-fam'i 1y development, on the south by
two-fam'i 1y residential development.
The 0wners request a zone change from the current Residential Cluster Zone Distrjct to Primary/Secondary Residential Zone Distrjct. This zone district is compatible with current and proposed uses. Primary/Secondary zoning currently exists south of the property.
The Owners desire to construct an apartment (studio apartment of approximately 350 sq. ft.) in the space that currently exists above their garage, and an exterior stair to access said apartment. The Owners hereby agree not to sel'l , transfer, or convey the uni t separatel y from the pri mary uni t, nor to " ti meshare" the apartment. The apartment shalI be available only to "full time employees" of the
Upper Eagle Valley for periods of 30 days or more.
The nature of the varjance requested is reljef from Section 18.i3.050 requiring a
minimum of 15,000 sq. ft. of lot area. The lot contains 14,080 sq. ft., including a portion within the 100 year f1 ood p1 ain.
lliscel laneous Cesh
l:-B3-irE tl: tt:18
F.ieceipt # l:.t1f,fEF
tlc':':un i {|at.J.uT'1-.-l ,-.t1 n ._,":rf, 7
I HTFJf; TEI:T',.FFF,L I iFT I i-tl.] FI:IF: I.JFIE I SI.IIE
Fri,:,un t tende red :: l rlF, EE
Iten paid
6t 6FErg41 f,f,as8E
ffnoun t psid
I [rgr, 9113
December 26, I9BB
FRITZLEN/PIERCE RTSIDENCE
VARIANCE RIQUEST
Required Statements
1. Relationshjp to adjacent Uses.
A1 though the subject property is bordered on the east and west by
1.1]f1;tyily..development, Town of vai r Zoning Regulations permit onty one owelllng unrt due to limited site area. Similar one and two family resi denti al uses exi st south of the south propertv 'l i ne ani primary/secondary zoning applies to those properties.
2. compatibi1ity and uniformity of treatment among s.i tes in the v.i cinity.
As in other areas.annexed by the Town of vail, zoning was app] r'ed to property based on ex'i sting uses - although some site characfer.i stici d.i d not cgTpl{ with al1 regulations of the zoni oistrict. The subject property,vlith its current and proposed uses, complies w.i th most iequire*ents of the zone distrjct (set backs, site coverage, GRFA, height, permitted uses).Numerous properties in the area lack sufficient slti aiei to comply with required site area.
3. __Effe-ct.on light and air, distributjon of population, transportation,traffic facilities, utilitfes, and pubiic safety.
. The fnll i cant proposes no negati ve i mpact on the above referenced 'rssues. public transportat'i on is available within 400 feet of the site.
e r
MEI'{CRANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Corunission
FRoM: Departxnent of Conununity Developnent
DATE : !,larch I 7, 198 2
SUBJECT: Public hearing and consideration of a request to rezone a part of
Lot 2, Block 5, Vail Interrnountaia Subdivision from residiential
cluster to low density nultiple-fanily. Applicant: Richard M. Torrisi
STJMMARY
The applicant wishes to uPzone the property frorn Residential Cluter (RC), which
would allow one unit on the lot, to Low Density I'tultiPle-Fanily (LDMF), which
would allow two units on the lot.
DESCRIPTION OF LOT AND SURROIJNDING AREA
The developable area on this lot is severely constrained by easenents and flood-
plain. There is a 20 foot parking easenent at the front of the lot. 0n the
west side of the lot a pedestrian easenent encroaches 5 feet into the lot. Two
feet of the eastern end of the Flussheirn building lies in the lot. More than
a third of the southern end of the lot is occupied by a pedestrian and utility
easement. An existing sewer line is contained in this easement. Approxinately
2.200 square feet of this 14,500 square foot lot is taken up by the Gore Creek
floodplain, The eastern portion of this lot contains another utility easenrent.
An abandoned foundation sits on top of the sewer easenent. Useable lot area
for development is approximately 2,800 square feet.
High density projects exist to the east and west of the lot. Duplex lots appear
to the south on the other side of Gore Creek. Interlochen condoniniums, rvi.th
39 units, is to the east of the lot. To the west i.s Flussheim condoniniuns,
with l0 units. The frontage road and Interstate 70 are to the north.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The followirg table compares sone
under current zoning and requested
Zone
ljnits Allowed on Lot
Square Feet of Structure
Setbacks
F ront
Sides
lle i ght
of the developrnent
zoning:
Current
Zoning
RC
statistics for this lot
Requcsted
Zoning
LDI'lF
2
3,681
I
3,067
201
l5r
53r
201
201
38 1
r Lottllk 5, Interm. -z- s/I7/g2
under the"requested zoning, the buildi.ng envelope would be snaller than under
the cutrent zoning bacause of the more restrictj.ve side setback requirenents in the LDMF zone. Under the requested LDMF zone the building envelope is 2803
square feet. Under the current zone the building envelope is 3,882 square feet.
The current zoning requires two on-site parking stalls; if a duplex were built four stal 1s would be required.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
.The staff reconmends denial of the upzoning request becasue of the physical linitations of the Lot and because such a rezoning would be inconsistent with the objectives of the Town, which discourage over-rowding of the land with structures.
Two units are not suited for this site. The LDMF zone would allow 617 additional sq.feet of GRFA and would require two additional parking stalls over and above--- -
what would be allowed under the RC zone. Given the easements and setback requirements the upzoning would overcrowd the lot.
In addition the requested upzoning is inconsistent with the developrnent objectives of the Town. In 1977 the Town Council adopted a growth managenent policy which substantially downzoned several areas in Vail . In the last few yeais thl Town
has also been purchasing land for open space which has removed hundreds of
Potential units frorn the narket. Also, the zoning code is intended to achieve several purPoses, one of thern is to rtprevent excessive population densities and
overcrowding of the land with stluctures." An increase of density on this lot
would be inconsistent with the development goals and objectives of the cornmunity.
llle realize that the Lot is surrounded on two sides with higher density units.But this lot is so severely constrained by its small size, small building envelope,setbacks, easenents, floodplain and parking requirements that the surrouncling high density does not justify the rezoning of the lot.
.t
ZONE CHECK
FOR
SFR, R, R P/S ZONE DISTRICTS
DATE: /- 20 -r7
LEGAL DESERITTMN: -Et h& Ef Block 5 Fi1 ing Lvltprnr,lryler+
one
Phone
lgu^lnr PROPOSED USE U
Ot,lNER
ARCHITECT
LOT SIZE
Hei ght
Total GRFA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
Setbacks: Front
Si des
Rear
Water Course
S'i te Coverage 2ofa
Landscapi ng
Fence,/Retaini.ng 14a'l I Heights
Parki ng
Credits: Garage
Mechani cal
Ai r'lock
Storage
Solar Heat
Drive: Slope Permitted
Envi ronmental /Hazards :
A'll owed
Fq(::)
352o
2il2
t107
20,
15'
15'
(30) (50)
27/G
(300)(600)
(eoo)(1200)
( s0) ( 100)
(25)(50)
( 2oo ) (4oo )
N" J'24- stope Actual
Aval anche
Proposed
3/'r,rnn '
2934 1376 . 2111
38o
"/
ll'
,tr3( +?l - t922
<-llgRirlrle ryf*Nl
by Corrrvcil s'/r'tl
4
Fl ood Pl ai n t-"'
SIope \./-
tletl ands
Geol ogi c Hazards ''-'
Corments:
Zoning: Approved/Disapproved
Date:
ffi
for
sFR, R, R P/5 7(JltE DJSTR]CTS
A+""1 Ie.oa'l Description: Lotht_?, Alor|
O,,ner Archi r"r, ?,un7OUt |--_7
Zone District Rla Proposed use < I Lot Size t4 <t /,)
Al I or.red
Heisht (30)(33)Total GRFA - 6[e
Primary GRFA rt| -,t1 \\-
a-LX. ir,. ?ri*t {_
Secondary GRFA
Fi1ing -An 1U
Setbacks: .
Front
'5ides
Rear
llater Course
Site Coverage
L ands capi ng
Parki ng
Credi ts :
Garage
20,
15'
15'
(30) (so)
Zr>
IS '/g7+
,^K
t o\(
-_<v .')
I'lechani cal
Ai rl ock
(30o) (6oo)
(soo) (l2oo)
(so)(100)
(2s) (so)
515
(/Y
Stora ge
Solar Heat
Stora ge
Dri ve: 51ope perni ited
Envi ronmenta1 /Hazards :
Co;;:nts:
( 2oo) (4oo)1o
Ava I anche
Flood Plain
S)ope t .lo, latt'
N IA
%
l'z oK -ttq/ r*/n xI,,$
Slope Actual
/.
/*),
Zon i ng:
Da te:
,1 O,
APPLTcATToN ,arc, // /A /b1 ' DATE oF DRB ;qrruHe , r il f lq
DRB APPLICATION
IAPPLICATION t'llLL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS SUBIIITTED*****
PNE-AIPL I CATION MEETING :
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
a
'::
*****TH I S
A pre-application meeting with,a planning staff member is strongly suggested to
detenliiri if any additional information is needed. No application will be accepted
unt"si it is complete (must include alI items required by the zoning adnlnistrator).
It is thc applicint's responsib'ility to make an appointment with the staff to flnd
out afout aiiitional submittal requirements. Please note that a CO|.IPLETE applica-
tion rrill streamline the approval process for your project by decreasing the number
of conditions of approval that the DRB may stipulate. ALL conditions of approval mlst
be rerolved before a building permit js issued.
I B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Mdress
LcAa I
Zoni ng
0escri pti on Lot
C. NAME OF APPLICANT:
Mdress
D. MI4E OF
Addres s
E. MI'IE OF
telephone47LL47
Si gnature
Address
. DRB FEE:
VILUATION
$ o-$ lo,ooo
$10,001 -$ 50,000
$50,001 -$ 150,000
$150,001 - $ ,500,000 rq00,001 - 91,000,000 over $1,000,000
IITPCRTANT NOTICE REGARDING
$ 10.00
$ 2s.oo
$ s0.00
$100 .00
$200.00
$300.00
ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
'" addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant must stakc thc s{tc
indicate property lines and building corners. Trees that ri 'l I bc rernvcd
,culd also be marked. Thjs work must be completed before the DRB Ylslts the
iie
he review process for NEl,l BUILDINGS will normally involve tro separrtc metlngn
cf the Design Review Board, so p'l an on at least two meetings for thelr rpprovrl .
Propl.e who fail to appear before the Design Review Board at their schedulcd
nneting and who have not asked for a postponement will be required to be
rlpu '1 i shed.
Bl ock Filing,T'prwmonw,N
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTAII\E: ,3ntt t p
tel eohone
The fee will be paid at the time a bu'i1d'ing permit is requested.
FEE
tel ephone
o
',erfE
The foilowing information'i s required for submittal by the applicant to the Design Revier
Board before a final approval can be fiven:
A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATER]AL COLOR
Roo f
Siding
Other Wal I Materials
i FVTFE?/OIZ -rl)e. Afr-tfi1w -r/-1 F,Ef elfF,-'rF Ex/.-n^ka- Featm,tfE
A I t-, ,, I E=
.i
iE or pao.lrcr'
,{GAL DESCR I PT I ON :
STREET AODRISS:
DESCRIPTION OF PR
Fasci a
Soffi ts
Wi ndows
lrJindow Trim
Doors
0oor Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fl ues
Fl ashi ngs
Ch i mneys
Trash Enclosures
Green hou s es
0ther
LIST OF MATERIALS
8. LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer:
pnone:
PLANT MATERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
Eotanical Name Conrnon Name
Er./5€lh)\t ad-clFtJ_ulu?a
Si ze*Quani ty
-7
--------ts-
drt
IX]STII{G TREES
BE Ri.MOVED
T0 Nat/ E
for conifers.
(over)
*Indicate caliper for decjducjous trees.Indicate height
'rl
Quanl ty
It
!PLANT MATERIALS:,
(con't)
SHRU85
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
GROUND COVERS
. Botanical Name
Tvpe
Cormon Name
@_Ptue
ZEDTI,6 'D^. uJaaD
Squrrc Footaqe
s0D
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
O'|HER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swinrning pools, etc.) Please spcclfy.
APPLICATION FOR SECONDARY UNIT FOR LOTS OF LESS THAN I5,OOO
SQUARE FEET IN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICT A}'ID IN T}IE
PRII!'ARY/SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICT
A. NAME OF PETITIONER
wnuessi4(9.16::<-QAy-Vat--*Q...--PHaI4-/LL.Hz
B. NAME oF nETITIoNER's REPRESENTATwT Sert>p
ADDRESS PHONE
C. NAME OF OWN
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS Ynom4TZ L34Z
D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
-zth,;
xnnness Z 3,.|J,
?Fs oF -LEGAL DESCRTPTTOI'I: Lot Z Block 5 Fil ing 'A/i\t
I
ll
E. FEE: $ 100
F. A list of the names and
adjacent to the subject
mailing addresses of owners of all property
property.
I1. CRITERIA
The Conmunity Developnent Departnent and Design Review Board nay gr€rnt an
exception to allow the addition of a second dwelling unit if the following
criteria are net:
1. The second unit shal 1 not exceed forty percent of the total GRFA allowed
on the Lot; and
2, the Ccnrrnuni"ty Development Department shall find that the granting of
::' the exception will not be detrinental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area j.n which the subject property is situat,ed; and
3. That no vatiances for setbacks, height, parking, site coverage or landscaping,
site devetopnent or gross residential floor area would be approved unless
the granting of such a variance benefits the visual appearance of the
site and surrounding area; and
f o\l r-t \
75 south lrontago road
Yall, colorado 81657
(303) 479.2138
(303) 47e2139
otlice ol community deveropment
PUBLIC NOTICE
Notice is hereby given that the Department of Conmunity
Developrnent of the Town of VaiI has received an application for a
secondary unit, on a lot of less that 15,000 square feet, in the
Prirnaryr/Secondary Residential zone district.
Applicant: WiIIlan Plercg,/Lynn Fritzlen
Location of proposal: A part of Lot 2, Block 5, Vail
Interrnountain
For further information, please contact the Town of VaiI
Planning Department at 479-21-38.
fiAatlcg h)r,0'rccg*k
O^X rrP.fS L-t l^n It tln1.w\-\
;),,
L '3-E\
Q Z.t' '
d'.--.j/
iE c'Q?
=-4 -x-'E-;J'-''
co
F=
!rJ
-0E
!tcJEo.o c,)
o.- > o
'- '-=
;+; u, i .tri!ura.itr.oc 4 Oi C-C A O C ! -o xo \t, r !J 600
o > '| u >c i c I *!'5::.€"-;:!
|'tt 6 o u 4r o r o I IEi!;r!lI :s: I l;:; g;g tT ;{r L !Pg-5;[$[ +E'F li c:: r s--si i I€;: l'E-i:*T;lI ;:;g i."j;::;lsir Fi;: l;
3"o3.f 5f : cfi: ili sfiij:3rl !.;E .:-'IE
;a3r'ltl:1 ;E..r: 't::llslilEi'icgi .-,r\e ;:-3:i3J€ .:"; Y6 !E!€i3:li !s:E 3 E " ! 3,9':, :5i .F;.E::"[3: EEi;li;riElri 33:E Eli;l;ErE EErf .c cr \ E o o o.t _
i:i:'1e5.i €t::jlr';:;l$ t5l;Ei5;!;3Ea !iiE
a r 3* 9; g o " i i 3'tgF:35:E: 3gE!jLE;EEi5i;i4
s\
F..\).J
3/o
4
60
'oo lq
60 ob
Ro,
!
(')
a*
!: i:l ;:i
ir:i i.)!-
;.J
O, >r q, c (U
E= UE Eo-c4ro
Ec>io
:J(J o.J(/rc<c \()FOO,rO o, !r cr ar (u .9- I L : oP c o i!Evtvnt.E L qr€
>'F r, .J C o cr|,! I !'o ooo
LCOCO!t o o \o E FC! F E o f L .p 'tt o (J C' U (u+
tt .rJ ,lt u .rJ o ol.- c ir,ar (^ 'tr >r@ (,
-E-FEf C L O+'F C<t >r(,.P EO(u'! L L->rEqr(u o.J a !,
t)|Eo.J>io < L C q,.C F-E q, >.9
.. ttr (U t9-rJJqrc ,Ao
H lCt (l,F >+r O c- c-E.!z 'o =H.J.o
b"
rn
'i.i
i.r t :l l:
'r/i >.:.Jl r--
..J
e.
\'.)?
ooo*
tqo.
-Qo
\),'o-_a
a
o
a\l
8 q
o
d (J
>'-f-
s
8
qJ
J
$
R qJ
F d rJ
$J
^|{,|
F
s R
H
s
u)
Y o o
\i
F o
-.I
|-t il
q
Fno
H[3
bqg
rH!
Ia$.t !i
I E!0
E{
IE
-9E
-.i Tf0
{l
o ir oaO
Eq?|lo
n:i
tl8
Project Application
,^,, 1- /rt /,o^€rc Project Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and
Owner, Address and Phone:
''-..Architect, Address and Phone: Z*zl/h--<-
,"n^,r""".o,Kr'1E-Btocr 6, ru,nnl/d4-fulrrn,rh,L.on"
Commenls:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Plan
ij!ri'_ rj:-!._Lx
for
sFR, R, R p/s 70ilE DISTRICIS
A+.,1 Legal Description: Lot(.-l Z I B.lock -f Fil in9
Lot Size
Hei ght
Total GRFA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
Al I or.red
(30) ( 33)
.A
-a#.. i^ loiu'"
Proposed 3\.s #7 -V su
o,rrrl _-r_-
orn", L,Jnn fr,[r"!-n, Ar-chitect t. I Zone District RIC proposed Use
Setbacks: .
Front
5lCeS
Rear
l'lo ter Course
Site Coverage
ta ndscapi ng
Pa rll i ng
Credi ts:
Ga ra ge
llechan i cal
Ai rl ock
S'r-ora ge
Solar Heat
Stora ge
Drive: Slope Pernitted
Envi ronment a1 /Hazards:
Co:;:nts:
Ztz
/S '/5V+
(\ F\
t o\<
--
3
Ava'fanche NIA
t'Flood prain "k -ttq/ mln il,4/i,
slope , N/,4
q ou kn,t%
?Q'
15'
l5'
(30) (so)
(30o)(6oo)
(soo) (r200)
(so)(1oo)
(2s) (so)
(200) (400)
515
</Y
4n
Sl ope Actua'l
I NIA
Zoning:A; proved/rffi se pp roved Da te:
,l -.
Project Application
Project Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
-1
Legal Description: Lot / -- ,
tl
Bf ock 1i- , Filing i1 u !z'.: "v !7 - , Zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date
DISAPPROVAL
E Statr Approval
o o
eJ,
1
'(-fr!
o S^.tt \. ..'
E I P:4
o
APPLICATION DATE:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
DRB APPLICATION
*****THJ5 APPLICATION t,lILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED*****
I. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:
A pre-application meeting with a planning staff member is strongly suggested to determine'if any additional jnformation is needed. No application will be accepted
unless it is complete (must include all items required by the zoning administrator).It is the applicant's responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to find
out about additional submittal requirements. Please note that a C0MPLETE applica-tion will streamline the approval process for your project by decreasing the number - of conditions of approval that the DRB may stipulate. ALL conditions of approval must
be resolved before a building permit is issued.
A. PR0JECT DESCRIPTT0N: ,tt<tF Fnrnl y qry.4/DEMCE
B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Addres s
Legal Description
Zon i ng
NAME OF APPLICANT:
Addres s
P+PT e F Lot' 2 Block FilinsVulrenil.
te1ephonefr77 572
be F.
F OWNERS:
telephone AAA7Z
DRB FEE: The fee wi I I
VALUATiON
paid at the time a building permit is requested.
FEE
$ 0-$ lo,ooo
$io,ooI -$ 5o,ooo
$:-50,001 - $ 150,000
$150,001 - $ .500,000
$500,001 - $l,ooo,ooo $ Over $1,000,000
$ lo.oo
$ zs.oo
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$300.00
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMiSSIONS TO THE DRB:
1. In addition to meeting submit,tal requirements, the applicant must stake the site to jndicate property lines and building corners. Trees that will be removed
should also be marked. This work must be completed before the DRB visits the site.
2. The review process for NEl.l BUILDINGS will normally invotve two separate meet'i ngs of the Design Review Board, so plan on at least two meetings for thejr approval .
3. People who fail to appear before the Design Review Eoard at their schedu'l ed
meeting and who have not asked for a postponement will be required to be
republ'i shed.
0. NAME 0F APPLICANT'S REPRESENTAFIYE: ,5atz-zf
Address tel ephone
NAME O
S i gnat
Addres
)1 o
ryAME OF PROJECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF P : c/1^J e F4-r14 // v Erc/C2F^/CF /</ l1H
Afi4:ft^rq F-1 6a€!41-&?
The following information is requ'i red for submittal by the applicant to the Design Review
Board before a fjnal approval can be fjven:
A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR
Roof
Si di ng
0ther l^lall Materials
LIST OF MATERIALS
-nuJ
CaLoe 1 3tz'OllL
Al-LlCf rt C4ott z. et u.ne
Fas ci a
Soffi ts
l,Ji ndows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fl ues
Fl ashi ngs .,.
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
0ther
B. LANDSCAPING: Name of
5rr ta n Cotoe I cno Z-llLL
*r"n El,nc+4
t I ll Ia I a't r't,|"-)
hj FraT fO /".7A r_a/j /%F
//-J 6,Ae41F
Des i gner :
phone:
Common Name PLANT MTERIALS: Botanical Name
JuiiPER.u:t
PR0POSED TREES ScsEu tzEtt&-
Satix
PoPCTLUb N16 PA
EgczYft?r4,\JUNtPET<
fbt-60 ftznF4fttE
PLbt/A^J
@LE^!-&L-La^J
Quani ty
/5
l5
t7
=LcwedEor'
1a"=r2g11tg:.rartr)
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED
4L (o'
/ Lz uca*,
/ Lz"cu-t-,
/ncz.(----...-.-.--,-
*Indicate caliper for deciducious trees. Indicate height for conifers.
PLANT I'IATERIALS:
(con't)
SHRUBS
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
GROUND COVERS
Botanical Name Common Narne Quani ty Si ze
Ftoee ALPINuo
/. /o*JE
Uu-e-
&LPtNE
Cuee.A^tr FWUtb .,WAleD
NATtv=ZAl+q
/6
-l
2a
/250
lG,+t-,
4 Ez-t--
Square Footage
/60ri
s0D /on9
SEED Aarcd
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
c.OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls,fences, swimming poo1s, etc.) P'lease specify
L
INTER-DEPARTI4ENTAL REVI E}.l
PROJECTT
DATE SUBMITTED:DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
PUBLIC I.IORKS
Revieweday, ,( gute_ZAA!
Comments: / /
n ^ 'zza'' "74( fuzz€7 0)tS Fcaoo Ft4t* 1o€arc/ - /r': t'oz-a'
O /s 7/ft't+- 4>' tl6Re2>-tex7 /:c'/ -/'// G 1r:1 t )-/zu(t EcOG'
E:€'/ rG o.- 7/Y/s pa" re-27 / a "'? L'r €37 J/au-
O <(€<k- tF Zl,e r ueL.' t1> <:uLvt-P-r / ! zv4' €-.? ''13
, O G+s L/..r(: Lo,-4a'a* ?
<&\ f,?rzoua's +>'a '/1 c'2'21''tr:*/J /k€ ,''1:1-7'tee r1'a 2
A lt:uttL/ .\J 6 /t\ -//l€ l+:-br'! # /4 '- I t'1/'t'/ / eagt>'tLJY
{LD-*,.o..t|<t:s,€-}]st>na."'-,f4.o.-c4tt.|P./(}2t6/z.o71./4dj>
FIRE Di'ARTMENT LiAtc 4 co*c r,-c- s'r PatDptlzl? < t-t' e:>=r/"'a,+c il ({t . /
Reviewed by:
Comments:
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Date
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Date
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comments:
riF
I
.l
Date
UTILITY LOCATION VERIFICATION
roB ufuz,frff&EN Fteze Znanprnp
Ft'-rl'of Lor' Z BLocK 5 FTLTNG
^Doxnss 27% O,fultrnt E fu. kl,
of utilities, whether they
be approved and verified by site p1an.
The location
1ines, nust
acconpanying
be nain trunk
the following
I ines or proposed
utilities for the
4ub.pe Mo#*r
Authori zed Si qnature Date
,/",-//"-L
I n-,ft
'8j-
7t-41b, 4\\L
141. ryyTz.*
14i .w20
Western 51ope Gas
Harry Moyes
Public Service Company
Gary Ha11 -'
Holy Cross Electric Assoc. ;--.
Ted Husky/M'ichael Laverty "/,/ * For ncw cor
Jf .f T /4/85 ptease T1 I I c
/ -af terhpd shpc t , attached shee
,/ ,/- -t'3/!Ef Vail.Cair.le T-V-
Gary Johnson
ya / , _1 ,tr-a.,-> Upper Eagl e Va1 1ey Water + l(a' \-',c'''tt and Sanitation Discri ct ,'
David Krenek Jl-"".-+ r/fr-
F,q-,/"-t A),
4 -t/J l"',
,_'t ;,.-
*,h*-
1
NOTE: These verifications do not relieve the contractor of his
responsibility to obtain a street cut perrnit fron the
Town of Vai1, Departnent of Public i{orks and to obtain
utility locations before digging in any publi.c ri.ght-
of-way or easernent in the Town of Vai1. .{ building pernit
is not a street cut pernit. A street cut pernit nust be
obtained separately.
This
This
fo rn is to verify
should be used in
service availablity and l ocation.
conjunction with preparing your
utility plan and scheduling installations.
@
I
I
I
I
\o
1t
a
t.,
(-P
4,
c\t c,
'r\_4\
tr
'loz-^
"s.
' i!
',t:%
, r'$
io,
.-_=' iil,'{iri-g
$i
r'\.
a+
2
t%
+.-r^'\'
;*
.i
...
t,
;,
t -- '.a"o
)," *t"/F
/?o'
:!)
,f,)
o
r
ail :
N o-
!9a"sl'crc"E 50 f,
--t (-
Ct +)
-a \{
\t t
e,;,
9
,f ' 'i''
;:c=>
r.r (5 (/t O J.rD rD -j a) . a,i"c-J J H ;(J o o, O3 "! =a)-r? t? O .< ,1 aln
O- -J' r-r't^^^(, -+) 3 rt o -1 (-i = f!'
J.==.srD =
O.. Or rD -cr- c ):t a)
-n -t N(n o -. r--!f A !n 3i<
E= c l.
9a).+
". r\.) -J
".c+3
- 3- .r'
Ln \< J.
=.|o
(*><
(a.!
.+=ii- ()
rD F- -r lo C-)!(,o 5c c. C-
a+q, !.
'< ct<
o (r(^
a-o=
)-r
n(D
)=
lc+
r:t
t=
i.:
t-o
.}
o
-5
(D
c_
r
O
f!
=
a)
o-
u1 =
t,'.l=
n ;'n (t
5-
n
U1
O
:
;'rl
31
(-rl
-f J
c)
z.=Lnu1
C(rcr!5 cc F- ,.t
9tOr-C.:,(r Oc*-C6 l
('rcc55 O5*.s)i
C Ft\9Cl I
C+ ct- a't ar a
.)(i()or iac(Dea
z.
f\)
,o
(J.]
;
'r ut )rv
f
.D
J
-
T
5
=.<
(,) r Cni
, r:-t :
Ja
cJ-
-tc
(:
.+:
at
c-(-.<:
o
r-+ -'1
- a'r
cc
at
(!'
a)
-l t)
'1
t-
i<i|-n
t*l;
t-
l--
i-r
la:
t -',
ln-
t,/ t-a C \h :_2 -(-CX::,CJ,r-i O a -@ t<o{i5
la_rrJf.CCJ
i! < .-t'e '.i <
'- te =(J :r (* =E C
ia7-rt=!=; _.t C). .: !! O -,'-t a :t --.. -z
: cJ:J /; F-C'-o.r 1rO1i)r:.!
' C=c-'. -T=5 c- -1 o J.O 4 (D u|J1 |.t X(/l .\J5= r) -.5 . arCrDOo.)r'n = cJ
I \.cir: (/| c)' lra c
' ':.] r -: r't:f, O . - 2.t- <o: -; i c..' a J.J 1 lr =. ..1- a+ O r) =-<<
=.'
- F
c+J. f .+ J'v) = c. !n
' .)=.). :
L,/t .+ = O_r'i a
c'r? - r-f . a JL. r) tJ1 t c - .-=a !_,Y ., E -:.:5:| \ .. -_l -,-.+ -
. \a'= 1-s = o
J1 '--
--.
'J1 1 <a
=:1 :if
- "r (-O =-'\ ^ -:'lr:'--.--\ 6 ='-'&I '<.*c<
,j --, J. ') a)'rt ' 1 = = -'-+:i =1cr)r+)!ct<: ir --
i*\ : ) a '- --\ ('()-<-'.1 :.= _.: l
-ii
.+ 5:D JOo-
c+ 5J.:- ('). =
J --l a.t
O C-L) rn
:O J. sa
('f {_)
= tr' a
(} .+ c'r
a-)
c -'
a?
--l
=5
a)
Cr
l-i
r)
rD
a)=
5-
-a<a)-
J(}
C-'
a(t r<
c
J
rf,
(
o
\n=
'<J
f:(-
-:E rt :.o
;.
rD ,-4
,o
T0: Utilit.y Companies Wichin The Towh Of Vail
FR0!1: Lynn Fritzlen, Williarn Pierce
SUBJECT: EncroachmenE of Non-SCrucEural FeaEures InE.o Utility ,Easements
. on a portion of Lor 2, Bloek 5, Vail InEermourain' Subdivision,
. Eagle CounEY Colorado.
Certain non-structural features intrude into cerEain utility easements
on the above referenced property and are described on the attached SiCe
Plan, dated April 2, 1985, and referred to as 'rExhibit Ar'. In the event
that any utility company requires use of the utility easements and said
installation of uE.ility necessiEat.es rernoval of non-struclural features
within the'utility easement, replacement of the features shall be aE Che
sole discretion and expense of the ProPerty ollner. This notice does not
however, permit damage to ProPerty outside utilicy easements.
This Document shall be recorded by the Eagle CounCy Clerk and Recorder
and shall be a perpetual encombrance of the ProPerty.
DaEes
ProperEy Owners
Mountain BelI
-- Western SloPe Gas
..- Public Service ComPanY
_
Holy Cross Electric
VaiI Cable T..V.
Upper Eagle Va11eY I,Iater
and SaniEacion Dis tric!
/-a4t-
4-z-?f
Lt-z-/5
f -2,--{r
atures'
c ot_o I.t A t r(r r)t..,r)tt ,.Drit,t .ri'l Ot.tt Iiat . a.t(t')''
''*1ttfl.,:;,:,',ii! 1',.,:,';".,1 J',' "" u'
Policy ol Title lnsurance
l*ued by
Transamerica Title Insurance Company
SUBJECT TO THE SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CON.
TAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPT,JLATIONS
IIEREOF, TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Californie corporation, hcrein cslled
the Company, inauree, as of Date of Policy ehown in Schedule d againrt loss or damage, not e:ceeding the
arnount of inrurance otated ir Schedule A, and coet-c, attomey!'feer and expen&s which the Company may
become obligateil to pay hereunder, ruatained or incurred by the inrured by rearon of:
l. Title to the estate or interest decribed in Schedule A being vested otherwise than ss stated therein:
2. Any defect in or lien or cncumbrance on such title;
3. Lack of a right of access to and from the land; or
{. Unmarketahility of such title.
In Viuz.est Whereof , Transsmerica Title Ineurance Company has caused thie policy to be rigned snd sealed
by ita duly authorized officers ae of Date of Policy rhown in Schedule A.
htridcDt
Sccrctrry
rero'twingmatters"*'il::,t"Jil:::"ff l:Jil":"'*:ffi
Ani law, o.O,rrurr"" 6. gorr"-rn"ntal regulation (including but not limited- to building anC 191ine ordinances) re'
;i'#.#;'";';"!-rliirt['or-prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyme-nt of the land,-or regulating the character'
ii',.Lnrion" or-locatio-n orinv imprdvement nJ*'oi'rt"i".fter eieited on the land, or prohibiting $Ti:fl::"JlJl ownership or a reduction in the dimensions o. ti.^ of lf," iand, or the effect of any violation of a
nance or governmental regulation.
Riehts of eminent domain or governmentat rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears
in-the public records at Date of Policy.
Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or oth6r matters (a) cr€€ted' suffered' assumei or aereed to by the
insured claimant; (b) not known to the,Comp#y;il'"il;;;*,i-'Ui gtJ-pit6t;;"c'+q: 9ut known-to the insured
claimant either at Date of policy or.t ,n" o"t"'ri,;""i;ffi;r;cquii"o an'e.tate or interest insured by this policy
and not disclosed in writing by the insurea craimani to irre co-piny p.i,oi to the date such insured claimant became
an insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss;; di;A;i;-ttui iniu."a-"i"i-ini: (d) attaching or created subse-
ouenr to Date of policy; or (e) resulring tn ross"o'rilffE! i"ttiiii*ii,Ii ""ittirJu,j"i, iustained if,the insured claim'
int had paid value for the estate or interest insured by thls pollcy'
CONDITIONS AND
l. DEFTN[lotrt of TER IS
' The following terms when used in this policy mean:
(a) "insured": the insured named in Schedule A' and'
suuiici to--cnv riehtt ot defenses the Company .may have
"""inri ttru nihca*insured, those who succeed.to the interesl
;?-;;;; -l;t;;ed bv operaiion of law as distinguished from
"Lr'-"rt"l" i"iiuaini uirt not litnited to' heirs, disrributees'
e;;i;;.: jiiwi"o#, personal representatives. next of kin' or
corporale or fiduciary successors.
(b) "insured claimant": an insured claiming loss or dam-
age hereunder'
(c) "knowledPe": actual knowledge, not conslnrctrve
rnoiifoe;"Ji"n-;tiJe *tticti mav be imputed to an insured bv
.reason ol any Public records.' (d) "land": the land described, !-Pec ilically.or by. -reference in sin6oure i, and improvements iffixed thereto which by law
lonstiture real property; provided, however,.the term "land"
does not include any irro'perty beyond tJre lines of the area
soecificallv described or referred to in Schedule A' nor any
ii-"tti. iiri6. ittter"st, 6tate or easement in abuttinS streets'
i&'iri. "u"nu"t, alleis, Ianes, ways or water'ways,. but nothing
it-.i.i" .rt.if "i"aify' dr limii th6 extent to which a rig'ht ot
aii:iii ro ina fmm- the land is insured by this Policv'
(e) "mortgage": mortgage. deed of trust, trust deed, or
other security instrumenl
(f) "oublic records": those records which by law impart
"o"tiiirctite notice of matters relating to said land'
2. CONIIHUATION OF INSURANCE AFIER CONVEYANCE O'
TITIE
The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of
Date oi pJicv-iit- fitoi of 'an iirsured so lonS .a.s such insured
i.'ii i'*-Ltllti'oi ini.ie.t in the land. or hold.s an indebted-
;;;;';"t;;"d bti purchase monev mortgage given-bv a pur-
;;;.e;-i;; sJch insured, oi so-long a! iuCh insured shall
iitiliiLiiiiv- uf rt"ton -qr iovinanti of warrantv made bv
iuct i*r..,i in-any transfer or conveyance,of such es[ate or
i;;;;i: provided' -rrowivei, this policv sh.all. not continue in
iii'"" "i'ti 6;;;;i'"rry ;uici."iit irom- such insured of either
""ia-".i"rJ or intereit bi irtJ i"aeuteoness se.cured by a pur-
chase money mort8a8e Hiven to such Insureo'
STIPULATIONS
(b) The insured shall . notify the Company .
promPtly in
writing (i) In case any "..,oi-'o?
proceedine ii begun -or de'
fense is intcrposed as set tot,'n in (i) a.bove' (ii) in-case klowl'
edpe shall come to "n ,n"u.J ireritinaer of Lny claim. oJ title
ii'iir-"i*ii *tti.t it adverse to the title to the.estate-ol-tll-"i"tt'
;; i;;;*i. ".d *r,i"t -ieltf ";;tJ-iost.or
damase for wjrich
fi"'C;;;;"t';av"6d'riiuiu tv uiti'je or this policv.' or (iii) if
iiit"-ro irt"-ert"te or interesi as insured' is.rejected Es un-
ii jir."i"6io. if such prompt n'otiie stratt not be'giver to. the
t6ni'p:i"i. -itt;; ; to'such' insured a1 I I iabil itv ot the- companv
shall' ceise and terminate in regard to the matter or matters
i;;';hi;h :;.ti piompt notice ii required:..provided'. however'
ii'"t'iiir,ii" i. .dtitv itt"tt in no case prejudice the rights.or any
;l;;,';;;,;;d fio"i iti. potitv-unlelss ihe companv shall be
;;;i;ii;A-brr-;uii' r"itui" iia-it'"n onlv to
'he
extent of
3uch prejudice.
/c) The ComDanv shall have the right at its own cost to
i".rii"i. and widhor;t undue delay prosecute any. ac'lon or
iill'.i!".,'a'i'i'l-. i;-;;;;v-,;ih; aif ivnictr in its opinion mav be
necessary or oesraDte to establish the title to the estate or
;;1;;;;l';. insured. and the Companv n'l?Y bke .lnv lqpro';;:;i;;.i;";';;d; it'e tii'"" or iri s poticv'
.
whether- or not
ii'itrli 6J'ii"ufe thereundei,- ana ltratt noi therebv concede
liabilitv or waive any provision of this polrcy'
(d) whenever the Company shall have brou8ht any action
or lntiJ.p"i"a a defense as'req:uired or permitted by- !h€ pro-
ii..'ii'it?- Gii Policv. the a;;b;v mav -pu'sue .unY ,:.'-9:'iii]i"iL" io iinai det6rmination by a qou+ o.q comPetent luns'
diction and expressly t"."tu"J-tft6 right, in its-sole discretion'
to appeal from anv adverse judSment or omer'
(e) In alt cases where this policy permits or qequires lhe
Comliny to prosecute or providi for-the defense of any.action
or Droceedrng, rne ,nrur"d heieunder shall secure .to the
Ll#i;'ii-|t 6";igitt to to pto.ecute or p.rovide defense in such
action or ProceeolnS,. ono ati appeats iherein, an-d .permit the
comDanv to use, at rtt opiion,'dtte -name of such insured for
i'i"ii' "-ii.-l".
- wttenevei' ildriestea by the Companv' such
ii.",i'r*[ !f,irr-ii;i-it'i-c.hi"ii all reaionable aid. in anv such
Iiii,ir "i i"i?;olru, in efrectiig settlement, securing evidence'
ouiainlng '*itnesses-, or prosectiting or defending such. action
ii'pl"'.liai'ii,';J- ih; id.p;;t siia I I reimburse such insured
for any exPense so Incurreo.
a. No CE OF I'O5S - I'lM[AllON Of ACrloN
In addition to the notices required under paragraph -3(b)of ttresi Conditions and Stipulati6ns, a statement in writing
of anv loss or damage for which it is claimed the company
ii tiutit" under this policy shall be furnished to the Company
*iiirin sro days aftei suc6 loss or damage shall have been de'
ie.minca and no right of action shall accrue to an insured
ilaimant until 30 diys after such statement -shall have been
iurnishcd. Failure to iurnish such statement of loss or. damage
ihatl terminate any liability of the ComPany under this policy
ss to such loss or damage.
3.
U
DETENSE ANO PROSECUIION OF ACrtgNS---N.OrlCE OF
;AiNi-io ae ctvrx BY AN lNsuRED cLAIMANT
(s) The Companv' rt its own cost and without. undue
a.r"i]'srr"ii pioui,i" riri the defense of an insured in 8ll litiga-
rt"n'ionslstlits of actions or proceedinRs comme.nccd aRainst
sJch insured.-or a defense interposed a8,-ainst an rnsure{ rn an
iliion rJ."fot.e a contract for'a sale of thc esta-te or. interest
irii"li-i"tia. i" ihe ett"nt thal such litiSation is founded upon
;;;iHA a"f"Ji. lien' encuml.ance' oi other matter insured
s8ainst by this Policy.
Continued on Front of Back Cover
against bY this Policy.
O Continued on Front ol Back Cover O
SCIIEDULE A
Amount of Inaurance 53rOOO.0O Policy\o. 4lOO35g
Dateof Policy January 13, I9g3 Sheet I of '0
5:00 P.M.
l. Neme of Insured:
LYNN FRITZIEN
2. Thc eotate or intcrelt in the laad dercribed hercin rnd which ir covered by thir policy ir:
rN FEE SII.{PLE
3. 1Ae estate or intetest referred to herein i3 at Dale of Policy vected in:
LYNN FRITZLEN
SCIIEDULE A-Continued
'Thc laud rcfcrred to in rhir policy ir riruatcd in the Statc of Colorsdo. County of
,lnd ir dercribcd rs followr:
A portion of'Lot 2, Block 5, VAIL INTERI4OUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT SUBDM
SION, described as followss Beginning at the weste=ly corner of
said Lot 2'
thence N. 53"35'05' E. along the southeasterly right-of-way line ot
Interstate 7O, a distance of I14.45 feet to the True Point of Begir
ning;
thence S. 2I"50'31' E. a distance of 52.24 feet;
ttrence S 04"53r00" w., a distance of 50.02 feet;
thence S 38"00100" w, a distance of 84.19 feet to a point on the
Southerly line of said Lot 2;
thence N. 6lo18'30" 8., along the soutJterly line of said Lot 2, a
distance of 44.20 feet;' ttrence N. 75"38'E., along tlre southerly line of said Lot 2, a disti
of 49.68 feet to the most easterly corner of said Lot 2; I
thence N 35o00r00" E along the Northeasterly line of said Lot 2, a
distance of I95.95 feet to the most Northerly corner of said Lot 2
thence S. 53o35r06' w along-tlie Southeasterly riqht-of-way line of
Interstate 7O, a distance'of 50.90 feet to the Point of Beglnning.
SCHEDULE B
6.
Thir Policy doer uot insure againrt loeo or damage by reaeon of the following:
l. Righte or elaimr of particr in posaecoion nor rhown by rhc public recorde.
2. Earemente, or cloim! of celements, not ahown by rhe pubtic recordr.
3. Dircrcpancien confictr io boundary liner, rhoriage in arca, cncrorchmcntq end any frctr which r cor.
rect .urvcy and inrpection of tho prcmicer would dirclocc and which arc not rhown by the public rccordr.
4, Any lien, or right to r licn' for rerricer, labor, or maierial hcretofore or hercaflcr furnichcd, imporcd by
lsw gud Dot rhorf,n by the public rccords.
5. Texea due end payeble; and any ta1 rpecial aa.elsmcntsr charge or lien ir rporcd for watcr or lcwer
rcrvice, or for rny othcr rpecial taxing dirtrict, Any and all unpaid taxes and assessmer
Rgstrictions, which do not contain a f,orfeiture or reverter claus€but. oroltting restrictions, if, any, based on race, color, religion or national origin, as contained in instrument recorded November L7,1970 in Book 219 at Page I20, as alnended by lnstrument re-corded April 28, 1971 in Book 220 at page 379 and as amendgd by instrument recorded April 282 .I9.7I in Book 220 at page 380.
Eascment and'right of way 5 feou in width ai.ong all interior lot Iines for use of utiJ'ity easements as reserved on the recorded PIat of VaiI fntermountain Development Subdivision.
Green BeIt, p€destrian and utiJ.ity easement across the Southerly portion of subjact property as shown on ttre record€d pht of t'
VaiI Intermountaln Development Subdivision.
UtiJ.it'y easement 10'feet in width through the cente'r of subject,property as sho$rn on the recorded PIat of vail Intermountai;
Development Subdivision.
Easement for electrical transmission purposes as granted to.HoIy cross Erectric Association rnc., by Jerry rngrum in tLre instrumen.recorded November 22., 1971 in Book 222 at page 343 affecting the fol.lowing described property: a 10.0 foot strip of land for an overhead por,ter line right of, way and easement, along the North boundary of Lot 2, Block 5 of, Vail Intermountain Development Subdivision adjacent to and parallel to the frontage road, be-ginning at the Northeast cornclr of, Lot 2, thence in a Southqrester direcLion 165.35 feet to the Northwest corner of, -Lot 2, Block S of Vail Intermountain Development,'Subdivision being in Section 14 Township 5 South, Range 81 l{est of the 6th P.!1., and as recorded in Book 217, Page 680 at tragle County Courthouse, Coloraclo.
o
"o
@
@
i
'r.
Fll rtr.ln,-_il-..
SCHEDULE B-Continued
li. Deed of Tnretfrom: Lynn Fritzl_en to rhe public.Truree of rhe C.o.rr,ry of - EagIe for the uce of , MiEAiL.,. e. w.uu tolecurc : S 3grOOO.0O
datcd . December 29., 19 g2 recorded : January ri, ,rigi.in
Bc rok 352 at page 24
-r.tf€'F f'rr r' rt
Continued frorn Back of Front Cover
5. OPTION3 IO PAY OR OTHERWISE
'gtll:
CIA]IAS
The Company shall have lhe option to pay or otherwisc
settle for or in the name of an insured claimant any claim in-
rured against or to terminate all liability and obliSations of
the Company hereunder by paying or tcndering payment of
the smount of insurance under this policy toBether with any
costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred uP to the timc
of such payment or tender of payment, by the insur€d claim-
ant and ruthorized by the Cornpany,
6. DETERIAINAIION AND PAYIAENT OF IOSS
(a) The liabilitv of the Company under this policy shall
in no case exceed the least of:
(i) lhe actual loss of the insured claimant; or
(ii) the amount of insurance in Schedule A.
. I (b) The Company will pay, in addition to any loss insured
aeainst bv this Dolicv. all costs imposed upon an insured in liti-gition carried 6n Uy ttre Company for such insured, and all
costs, attorneys' feei and expenses in litiSation carried on by
such insurcd with the written authorization of the Company.
(c) When liability has been definitely fixed in accordance
with the conditions of this policy, the loss or damage shall be
payable within 30 days thereafter.
7. llrvtlIATlON OF llABltlTY
No claim shall arise or be maintained under this policy
(a) if the Comoanv. after havins received notice of an alle8ed
difect, lien oi eicumbrance irisured against hereunder, by
litigation or otherwise, removes such defect, lien or encum'
brance or establishes the title. as insured, wit}|in a reasonable
time after receiDt of such notice: (b) in the event of litigation
until there has been a final determination by a court of com-
petent jurisdiction, and disposition of all apPeals therefrom'
idverse to the title, as insured, as provided in Paragraph 3
hermfi or (c) for liability voluntarily assumed by an insured
in settling iriy claim or -suit without prior written consent of
the Company.
t. REOUC ON OF l.tABrt|rY
All payments under this policy, except payments made for
costs, attoineys' fees and eipenses, shall reduce the amounl
of th! insurarice Dro tanto. No payment shall be made without
Droducins this Ddlicv for endorsement of such payment unless
ihe nolicv bc lbst <ir destroyed, in which case proof of such
loss'or dcslruclion shall be furnished to the satisfaction of
the Company.
9. TIABIIITY NONCUMUTATIVE
It is exDresslv understood that the amount of insurance
under this oolicv -shall be reduced by any amount the Com'
Danv mav bav irnder policy insurinB either (a) a rnortgaBe
itrofun oi riferred to iri Schedule B hereof which is a lien on
the estate or interest covered by this policy, or (b) a mortgage
lrereafter executed by an insured which is a charge or lien on
the estate or interest described or referred to in Schedule A.
and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment under this
policy. The Company shall have the option to apply to the pay-
inenfof any such mbrtgages anv amount that otherwise would
be payable hereunder to the insured owner of the estate or
interest covered by this policy and the amount so psid thall
be deemed a paymenL under this policy to 5rid insurEd owner.
lO. A?POtrlONrrlENf
lf the lrnd described in Schedule A consists of two or more
parcels which are not used as a single site. and a loss i3 estrb'
lished rffectinp one or more ol srid parceb bui not rll. thc
loss shall be ibmputed Bnd settled on e pro rata basis e.l if
the amount o( inlurance under thir Policy was divided pm
rata as to the vslue on Date of Policy of eich sepsrtte parcel
to the whole. exclusive of any improvemenls made subsequent to Date of Policy. unless a liability or value hes otherwisc
been agreed upon as to each such parcel by the Company and
the insured at the time of the issuance of ihis Policy rnd
shown by an express statement herein or by tn endorsement
sttrched here(o.
I I. SUEROGAIION UPON PAYMENT OR SETTI.EflENT
Whenever the Company shall have settled r claim under
this policy, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company
unaffected by any act of the insurcd clsimsnt. The Company
shall be subrogated to and be entitled Lo all rights and reme-
dies which such insured claimant would have had against any
person or property in respect to such claim hsd this policy not
been issued. and if requested by the Company, such insur€d
claimant shall transfer to the Company all riBhts and remedies
against any penion. or property necessary in order to perfect
such right of subrogation and shall permit the Company to
use the name of such insured claimant in any transaction or litigation involving such rights or remedies. lf the payment
does not cover the loss of such insured claimanl the Company shall be subrogated to such rights and remedies in the pro-
portion which said payment bears to the amount of said loss.lf lo6s should result from anv act of such insured claimant.
such act shall not void rlris piticy, Uut t}|e Compahy, in that
event, shall be required to pay only that part of any losses
insured against hereunder which shall exceed the amount. if
anv, lost to the Company by reason of the impairment of the
right of subrogation.
12, IIABIIITY IIM]TED TO THE POI]CY
This instrument together with sll endorsements and other
instruments, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the
entire policy and contr8ct between the insured rnd the
Company.
Any claim of loss or drmage, whether or not blsed on
neBliBence. and which arises out of the status of the title to
the estate or intercst covcrcd hertby or any action rsserting
such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions end conditions
and stipulations of this policy.
No amendment of or endorsement to this policy can be
made except by writinB endorsed hereon or rttached hercto
signed bv either the President, 8 Vice President" the Secretery.an Assistaht Secretary, or validating officer or authorized
signatory of the Company.
t 3. NOTICES. WHERE SENT
All notices required to be given the Company and any
statement in writ ing required to be furnished thc Company
shall be addressed to Transamerica Title lnsurance Company,
P. O. Box 605, Denver. Colorado 80201.
Arlll=I
.(
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE
o(r'
0ctober 27, 7982
The Town of Vail
Office of Conrnunity Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, C0 81657
Gentl emen:
In response to the Notice and Order for Demolition (enc1 osed)
that I received October 25, L982, I am no longer involved jn
any way with this property. I had, at one time, an option on
this property but pursued no action when the Town of Vail
rejected the request for zoning change.
I would suggest you send this Notice and 0rder to the record
owner in order to get this problem solved.
Si ncerel y,
Richard M. Tomisi
RMT/ bab
Encl osure
ONE PARK CENTRAL . 1 515 ARAPAHOE STREET . DENVER. COLORADO 80202 . PHONE (303) 292-3700
a o(OC
NOTICE AND ORDER
FOR DEMOLITION
IN THE MATTER OF THE
INCOMPLETE AND DANGEROUS
BUILDINGS LOCATED ON
LOT 2, BLOCK 5, VAIL
INTERMOUNTAIN SUBDIV ISION
T0: Richard M. Torrisi
One Park Central
1515 Arapahoe Street
Suite 1600
Denver, Colorado 80202
KINDLY TAKE N0TICE that the Town of Vail Building 0fficial in accordance with
the Uniform Building Code, 1982 Edition, as adopted by the Town of Vail and
the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1982 Edition' has
inspected the fol 1ow'i ng described site:
Lot 2, Block 5, Vail Intermountajn Subdivision
commonly known as 2988 S, Frontage Rd. West.
Upon inspection it was found that the conditions of the foundations on the
site render the site dangerous under Section 302 of the Uniform Code for the
Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1982 Edition, as follows:
(1) There is stee'l re-bar protruding from the unfinished foundation
l.lalls. Sec. 302 8 (iv)
(2) The unfinished foundation walls of the bujldings are unprotected,
and people in the area could fall into unprotected areas. Sec.3U2 12-(i)
(3) The incomplete foundation and the sumounding site are littered
with trash, debris, and construction materials which provide breeding and hiding
areas for pests, varmits, and vermin. Sec. 302 18
(4) The surrounding site in their open and unprotected state are
an attractive nuisance for children. Sec. 302 12-( i )
(5) The littered and unfinished building and the surround'ing site
are a health and safety hazard for the residents and visitors of the Town of Vail.
Sec. 302 18
The Town of Vail Building 0fficial has determined that the incomplete buildings
are unsafe and shall not be occupied or otherwise used jn their present condition.
You and each of you are hereby ordered to obtain the necessary and proper demo'lition
permits from the Town of Vail on or before November30,1982, and the incomplete,
dangerous buildings includ'ing all foundations and structures removed within 30 days
of this notice.
.*,' "NgrlcE AND oRDER FQR DErof N Oc
If the required der'rolition isnot corunenced as herein required' the
Bui'lding Officia'l will order the incomplete, dangerous buildings, including
all foundations and structures posted, and he may cause the work to be done and
charge the costs thereof against the owners of the property.
Any person hav'ing any record title or legal interest in the build'ing may
appeal this Notice and Order to the Board of Appeals, provided the Appeal is
made in writing as provided by the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Oangerous
Buitdings, 1982 Edition, and filed with the Building Official within thirty (30)
days of the date of this Notice and 0rder. Failure to appeal wil constitute a
wajver of a'l 'l rights to an adminjstrative hearing and determination of the matter.
Dated: :froi1tt AI LZ-t4
CERTIFICAT OF MAILING
State of Colorado ))ss
County of Eagle )
hereby certify that I am over the age of 18 years and
am not arFfftyTo-thIs aEtion, and that I have caused to bq served by mailing,
certified' iosiage prepaid, return receipt requested , on &'tl-L) jt z?r t
a Not'ice and 0rder for Demolitjon of the foundations located at Lot 2, Block 5'
Vail Intermountain Subd'ivision, a copy of which appears on the forego'ing. Said mailing
take place at "zC feYarTfct , tt AtL eoLo/4th , on or about
nc.rcttz,l.tffi'ab .M.
Subscribed and sworn to before ne this@!of
n
ry
r,1 ii,,i.j I i.:l
i1,1l;,,i:i]'j ", iiili"!.l'', o !li'''
i i\ (?
7:l-|0 I'.il .
on Tucsclay, Jrrnc 1, 1982, :r regular mect. intl o-t the Vaj I 'l'or"n councif rvirs
heId in tirc Vai I l\rlunicipal llui lding Counci .l Clrarnbers.
t\tE],illEns PItIjs]iNT :
ABSENT:
OTi]ERS PRESENT:
Di11 l!'iIto, I\layor Pro-Tem
Chuck Anderson
IIerrnanu Staufer
Ron Todd
Gai I \ltallrlich
Roclney 11 . Slif er, lrlal'e1'
Paul Johnston
Richard Caplan
Laryy Eskwith,
Colleen K1ine,
, Town l'{anager
Torvn Attorney
Torvn Clerk
The first item on the agenda was an :honoraly resolution declaring the month
of June,1982, as parks and recreation month in Vail, Colorado. Moses
Gonzales, program birector of the Recreation Department, introduced all
the recreation directors to the Council and citj.zens. Iie was then presented
with a proclamation.
'lhe next item on the agenda. was the second reading of Ordinance #5, Series
of l_982, an ordance relating to the a.rterial business district. Richard
Caplan stated that there were some changes made to the ordinance from
fiist read.ing. Dick Ryan revierved the zutrendments with the Council. Tllere
rvas nruch discussion following. Chuck Anderson stated that he was opposed O to the ordinance in that be thought it was an unappropriate use of the lan-d.- .l
After more discussion, Bon Tocld made a motj-on to a"pprov-e 9+lin1!:1 jl-o" ^i).7^
second reading with the additional changes as out-tlnect by tne Uouncll
Staufer seconded the tnotion. A vote was taken and the moti.on failed -
2 in favor and 3 against - Anderson, Wilto and i{ahrIich. A second motion
was.mzide by Ron Todd with an addj.tional amendment to exclude "Iodges" from
the conditional uses. A vote was takeu and the motion was passed 3 to 2.
Anderson and I\'ahrlich oPPosing.
The next item on the agenda was the reading of Ordinance #16, Series of
Lg82, an enelgency ordinance introduced because of the mud slide problems
in the,Highla;d Mbado*'s area. Bill Mlto stateri that the Council had decided
to rvittidia:il-T6-ir--o-idfFance and send it back to the Town Attorney, as they
felt they had reaehed a solution for the time being wit_!_out having to
put a moiatorium on the area. . There was digcuflion fo1-1olv'i.nei---1! motion was
made by Ron Todd. to withdra.w Ordina.nce #L{and Chuck Anderson sebbn{gd it.
Some discussion folloived. A vote was t4Ken and the ordinance passed\qEnimously (Verbatim motion by Rod Todd on this orpinance attached to these minutes\
The next item on the agenda was the fiy'st reading of Ordinance #9, Series
1982, an ordinance rezoning a part of lL-pI-2, gto
division from residential cluster to [ow density mu ''|
)'Di*EI-TFn explained the ordinance to hhe Council
and the Planning Commission both recommende en . Dick
f
b*
le:rding of ordinance #15, Series of
on of al lorvabl e f loor area to steepll'
Tocld made a motjon to applove
i t. AII vott,tl in 'f avor alrd i"lre-
1:ult).i shcd in f ul1.
Disette, represerrting 1\1r. Torrisi, the applicant, and Fred Butler, representing
the applicant presented their request to the Council. After much discussion,
Ron Todd made a motion to deny ordinance #9 and Gail l{ahrlich seconded it.
A vote \ras taken and the motion carried 4 - t - Hermann Staufer opposing.
:]re next item on the agenda \vas the first reading of Ol'dinance #\4, Series
i 1982, an ordinance amending the grgp-lode-ordinance for the Torvn of Vail.
ter J;tnr:ir of the Commrrnity Development Dcpartment stated tirat this rvas
.! n -l 1, a irousekeeping ordinance. There \ras s()me discussi.on on the ortli-nlince.
. ,.,.'.k Andet'son nrade a mo.l;ion to approve ordinltnce #14 on f j.rst reading and
:.r..: r:lftnn Staufer seconded it. AII voted in favor and the motion passed
r, r'tnimouslv and rvas ordet'ed 1>ublished in fu1I.
Tlrc: ncxt item on the agencla \ras the f irst
1082, an ordinance relating to distributi
,slopi.ng. lots. Af ter sonlc cli scrtssion, Ron
()t'ti i rrlncc #15 and Chuck .'\n<itlrson sect>ttcltrtl
Notlxt Trs;SC.d unan jtnotls) 5' and sas ol'dct'cd
J
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INVESTMENT REAI ESTATE
(!ar y
Q',
/5 tu;;,:(Q3.r,'*'3
,/-_La,
/gzr.&,,
April 28, 1982
Mr. Richard Kaplan
Town Manager
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road Vail, C0 81657
RE: City Council Hearing for Zoning Application on Lot 2,
Block 5, Vail Intermountain Subdjvision, Richard M.Torrisi, Applicant
Dear Mr. Kaplan:
This is to confirm and formalize that we have been scheduled for a 7:30 p.m. Town Council Meeting to hear the above-referenced
Zoning Applicat'ion heard before the Plann'i ng Commission on March 22,
1982.
This letter is being sent to you at the request of Betsy of the
Town Planning Conrnission 0ffice who to'l d me by telephone today that we were scheduled for the May 18 meeting. Please confirm at your earliest convenience and,/or inform me if there'is any
change necessary.
Thank you for your consideration.
Richard M. Torrisi
c: Richard DeGette
ONE PARK CENTRAL . I 5 I 5 ARAPAHOE STREEI . DENVER. COLORADO 80202 . PHONE (303't 292-37OO
gerely,
an AAdBftG cqrparv
,,{.,o
PLAN NING AI'ID ENVIRO|{MTNTAL COMMISSION
l4arch 22, 1982
STAFF PRESENT
Scott Edvrards
l.li I 'l Trout
Duane Piper
Dan Corcoran
Diana Donovan
Jim Morgan
Jim Viele
Dick Ryan
Peter Patten
Jim Sayre
Peter Jamar
Betsy Rosoiack
The meet'ing was called to order at 3:.l0 by Dan Corcoran, chairman,
1. Approval _oJ q_Lnutes of Margh 8., ]9_8.2,-
Betsy asked for the name of the person who moved to table item 3 and was told
that it was Scott. l,{'ith thjs correction, Scott moved and Diana seconded to
approve the corrected minutes. The vote was 6-0 in favor with Dan abstaining.
2. Request for a rezoning of lot 2, Block 5, Intermountajn. to rezone from Resi Ti:Ftrir Res i d en t i a I C1 u s te n to L ow-oG rsiTy-MTlTi:Ftrirffi of tivo units. Appl-rant:-Rrttrard-Torrisi.
Jim sayre reviewed the memo e] aborating more with the use of a map describing the easements,;the flood pl ain and the existing foundation. Dick Ryan added that it was council policy not to upzone land--that they had voted to deny upzoning.
Dick Torrisi, the applicant explained that he had misunderstood the staff, that he
thought he had been encouraged to ask for the rezoning. He added that he felt that this was an undeveloped island betleen tr,ro high density projects, and that no one
would put a single family home on jt. He felt that the existing foundations
and the other items on the lot such as boulders nnde this lot an eyesore.
Richard DeGette, the architect shoi*ed a model of the ner'ghborhood and stated thar there was very little impact on the ne'i ghborhood with this duplex. Jim sayre pointed out that the applicant might consider Primary,/Secondary wjth one ernployee unit. Torris'i expiained that he vlasn't interested in pursu'ing that. He added that the foundation in place was to be for l0 units. Dick Ryan pointed out that w'ith
the-County RSl4 zoning of I urrit per 8,00C square feet, only a single famjly drvelfing
could have been built on the lot.
Dan read into the mjnutes that a letter had been received from Jo Cap1e, a resident of one of the neighboring units expressing displeasure and pointing out that the
parkr'ng_was gor'ng to be a problem. DeGette restated the fact that even |^Jith a duplex
on the lot, it rvas still much lower in density than the surrounding property. The parking easernent was discussed, with Torrissi explaining that hc haa'tne right to the easement. Further discussion took place concerninq a possible aqreenrcnt to restrict one unit to employee housini. Howevei, no'agr6eineril iouTo-tu-i:cached.
Scott moved and Dan seconded to deny the request to rezone lot 2, blk 5, Internrounta.i n as per staff memo dated 3/17/82. The vote gas 5-2 vrith Jim l'l & Jjnr V against,
Jjm V felt that this was a special case, especially with the high density.rround i+
Q, -,-3/22/82..
3, &g! gs-||q._q_! o n d:t i q l-ql-g-l g-_ qgljj,lg co n s t ru g t qn.,of f i ce-Fgi l d i n s - o n t he
exjsTinE-r?Fco_SGfiotEte gj 9s3-sbuIh_FIogtage noao tles!-t.]1-q--Uccll--q9!.y-r-c,
District. Appltcant: I{ & t,J venture
Peter Patten explained the memo and stated that the Texaco site was the catalyst
for the new arterjal business district vrhich had been tabled at the previous council
session, The cument request vras withjn the heavy servjce distrjct. He added that
on'ly minimum development standards were listed in the zoning code, and that they
were not very stringent,..nor were they set up for an office building'
.lim Morgan.,one of the appljcants, exp'l ained the project and handed out two papers
wjth statistics listed comparing the proposed structure with what could have been
allowed on the site, stat'ing that he and his partner, Al l^ljlljams, felt that this
was a considerable down zone and an up grading of the property. He added that there
was little surface park'i ng and there was much landscap'ing. He added that one couldn't
discuss the hypothetical zone. He also stated that there would be no retail space'
only offices in the building, that the building would appear to be only 2 stories
from the Interstate, Djscussion followed concerning the transition from 5-6 stories
in Lionshead. The scale and mass of the building were a concern to nnny.
Steve Isom,-.the architect, explar'ned the site p1 an including the acceleration/deceleratic
lanes,.and the fact that they were based on highway codes. He added that these vrere
the first being bu'ilt on the Frontage Road, and that even the parking structures
.did not have them. He added that he felt that the scale was correct in ljght of 'the l4ark, Simba Run,-Breakaway l,Jest and Glen Lyon office buildjng. He stated that
the bujlding would be below the level of tree coverage, and vtould appear to be l-l/2
stories from the Interstate,
Diane expressed concern about the bulk, She asked about snow removal and about
turn-around space for cars entering the surface parking. She vtas concerned that
the snow would be pushed into the Red Sandstone Creek. Isont explained that there
were flat areas around the building that could be used for sno!./ storage, and that
the ramp was heated, Duane expressed the wish that the proiect would be presented
under SDD. He added that he would have liked to see a variety in the roof line even
though it wasn't required, He felt that it contributed to the feeling of rnass as
it was being presented.
Scott quest'ioned the condjtional use, and Djck answered that under the Heavy Service
development standards the office cou.l d only be a conditional use, not a use by right.
Dick also added that only business offices could located in the building, noi pro-
fessional offices because of the r:estrjctions in the Heavy Service District.
Dan stated that when the artenial business zone vras being discussed, it was felt
that 60ti site coverage was adequate. He agreed with the staff as to the size and
bulk of the building. Diana expressed concern that the building would appear too
large next to whatever could bp built on the Voliter site because it was sntaller.
Isom replied that because of the sjze of the Voliter site, anything built there
would have to be tvlo stories, Jjm M. reminded thenr that site coverage could have
been 75ii in Heavy Service D.istrict.
Bi'l I Post spoke for the applicant and renrinded the board that the proposed zone coulo
not be considered.
PEc -? r,r,u,
Jim Rea, lessee of the Texaco station at the site, expressed his concern that *,,ire
costs per square foot not be too expensive for potential businesses to iease.
Dick Ryan again emphasized that the surrounding buildings, i.e. sewer treatment p1 ant,
G'l en Lyon office building and others vrere I or 2 stories. Peter P, quoted from the
Heavy Service purpose section of the code relating to the fact that Council and PEC
nray prescribe more restrictive development standards than the standards prescribed
for the district in order to protect adjoining uses from adverse influences. Post felt that all related questions had been ansvrered. Dick anslered that the board
had to decide what was best for Vail.
Eric Monson and Andy Norris supported the building, with Andy suggesting that there
be caution to insure that the surrounding properties did not automatical 1y feel that
they could a'l so have the same density. Elliot Alport fe1 t that the 1.04 FAR was
common in the core areas and could be handled sensit'i vely,
Duane moved and Jim V seconded
struct an offjce bujlding in a
site on the South Frontage Road
The vote was 4'2 in favor with
4, Reouest for an amedment to
to approve the request for a conditjonal use to con-
Heavy Service Zone Distrjct at the existing Texaco
per the staff memo dated March .l5, .|982,
Dan and Djane voting against it, and Jim M abstaining.
ErolSTT6oFTffi-l
Peter Jamar explained the memo and added that the percentage of site coverage t^tas
not being changed, but that the increase was within the exjsting building.
After discussion, Scott moved and Hil'l seconded to approve the request to increase
the a'l lorvable gross floor area within the Glen Lyon office build'ing. The vote was
6-0 with Jim V abstaining,
This jtem was to go to the Council April 6.
5. Request for a. rezoning of lots 1 through 5, Cliffs'ide subdjvision from Residential Wi Tatft-Tole,-
DiFit-a u?iIl-i cfi'a-r?T'rown . -=.-
Peter Patten explained the previous action leading up to this request. The appiicants
werenot at the meeting, and Peter descrjbed various efforts to get jn touch with
their attorney to no avail. Sjnce there were in the audience severa'l people interested jn the outcbrne of the proposal , it was decided to go ahead with the hearing.
Peter P. explained that the staff was in favor of the request only if the condition
on the nrerno were included. The staff's reasons were the steepness of the sites,
the size of the'l ots, and the fact that when The Ridge was being developed, one
restrjction placed on The Ridge was that the hontes be pu1'l ed back fronr the ridge
so that they did not sit on top of it,
The discussion that follolved concerned access problenrs and vrhat restrictions could
be placed on the developr:rent of lots 4 and 5, Craig Snowdon, archjtect representing
pment District 4 to increase the allotvab] e
Lyofr-0rf!+-E-ullE;E. TFFII AnfTn6/ Norr
a a Q-+-3/22/82
the Ridge at Vail ofvners, showed a survey study and sections which showed various grades and explained the difficulty with keeping wjthin the Town requirement of an 8% grade on the roads. He added that the owners of the Ridge were not concerned with square footage requested, but were very concerned with access,
Various solutions were discussed. I'iill questioned whether the Planning Comm'ission
c9.1]{ jllose restrictions on someone's land on a rezoning. Dick answeied'that tney would have to amend the zoning in order to add restrjctions.
Duane moved to approve the request to rezone c.l'iffside subdivjsion, lots'l -5 from existing Residential Cluster to Single Family Residential wjth the fo1 lowing restriction:
That no structurer,'improvement or increased grade occur at a height the exist_ing el evation at any point on the back property line which property line with The Ridge at Vail subdivision.
Will seconded and the vote was 5-0 in favor with Dan and Jim Morgan
greater than is the common
abstaining.
o
PLANN
a
SSION ING AI.ID ENVIRONI{INTAL COl'lMI
l{arch 22, L982
* 2:00 p.rn. Site visits
3:00 p.ttt.
I, Approval of nrinutes of meeting of !'larch 8, 1982.
2. Rbquest for a rezoning of Lot 2, block 5, Internountain, to rezone from
Residential Cluster to Low Density MuIti-Fanily to allow the construction
of two units. Applicant: Richard Torrisi.
3. . Request for a conditionaL use pernit to construct an office building on the
existing Texaco Station site at 953 South Frontage Road West in a Heavy
Service Zone district. Applicant: M & W Venture.
1. Reguest for an anendment to Special Developnent District 4 to j.ncrease
the allowable gross floor area within professional and business offices.
Applicant: Andrew Norris.
5. Request for a rezoning of lots I through 5, Cliffsi.de subdivision from
Residential Cluster District to Single Fanily District. Applicants:
Charles Rosenquist, David Cole, Daryl R. Burns, Richard Brown.
..4
l.'tElXlRANDUltl
T0: Planning and Environmental Conmission
FROM: Departnent of Conununity Development
DATE : I{arch I 7, 198 2
SUBJECT: Public hearing and consideration of a request. to rezone a part of Lot 2, Block 5, Vail Interrnountain Subdivision from residiential cluster to low density nultiple-fanily. Applicant: Richard I'1. Torrisi
SI,JMMARY
The applicant wishes to upzone the property fron Residential cluter (RC), which would allow one unit on the lot, to Low Density Ntultiple-Fanily (LDl',lF), which would al1ow two units on the lot.
DESCRIPTION OF LOT AND SURROIjNDING AREA
The-developable area on this 1ot is severely constrained by easenents and flood-plain. There is a 20 foot parking easenent at the front oi the lot. 0n the west side of the lot a pedestrian easement encroaches 5 feet into the lot. Two feet of the eastern end of the Flussheirn building lies in the lot. More than a third of the southern end of the lot is occupied by a pedest.rian and utility easenent. An existing sewer line is contained in this easement. Approximately 2,200 square feet of this l4,soo square foot lot is taken up by the-bore creek floodplain. The eastern portion of this lot contains another utility easement.fui abandoned fowrdati-on sits on top of the sewer easement. Useabl e iot area for developnent is approximately 2,800 square feet.
High- density projects exist to the east and west of the lot. Duplex lots appear to the south on the other side of Gore Creek. Interlochen condoiriniuns, wiiir 39 units, is to the east of the Lot. To the west is Flusshein condominiums,with 10 units. The frontage road and rnterstate 70 are ro the north.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
the following table conpares sone of the devel opnent statistics for this lot under current zoning and requested zoning:
Zone
[Inits Allowed on Lot
Sguare Feet of Structure
Setbacks
Front
Sides
Height
Current
Zoning
RC
I
3,067
201
151
33 1
Requested
Zoning
LDMF
2
3,681
201
201
38f
t lol LO, Bik s, lnrerm. -J- s/L7i ..-
Undcr the rcqucsted zoning, the builciirrg crrvelope w6uld be -srmrller than urrclcr
the current zoning bacause of the rnorc restrictive side setback requirenelts in the LDMF zonc' Under the requested [,DlrlF zone the building cnvelope is 2803
square feet. Under the current zonc the building envclope is 3,882 lquarc feet.
The current zoning requires two on-site parking stallsi if a duplex were built four stal ls would be required-
ST,\FF RECOiUI'lli\llAT I0N
The staff recomnends denial of thc up:oning request becasue of the physical.lilDitations of the lot and because such a rezoning would be inconsistent with the objectives of the Town, which discouroge over-rowding of the land with structure:
Two units are not suited for this site. The LDMF zone would allow 617 additionat sq.feet of GRFA and would require two additional parking stalls over and above---'what would be allowed under the RC zone. Given the easenents and setback requirenents the upzoning would overcrowd the lot.
In addition the requested upzoning is inconsistent with the developnent objectives of the Town. rn 1977 the Tor,n council adopted a growth nanagenent policy which substantially downzoned several areas in Vail . In the last iew yeais the Town has also been purchasing land for open space which has renoved hundreds of
Potential units from the narket. Also, the zoning code is intended to achieve several purposes, one of thear is to "prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land with structures.'r An increase of density on this lot would be inconsistent with the development goals and objectives oi the cornrnunity.
We realize that the lot is surrounded on two sides with higher density units.But this lot is so severely constrained by its snall size, srnall building envelope,setbacks, easenents, floodplain and parking requirements that the surrounding high density does not justify the rezoning of the lot.
r\
Planning Commission
Town of Vail
Vai'l , Col orado 8'l 657
JO CAPLT
P.0. Box 1874 Vaii, Colorado 8l658
e
l'!arch 15, 1992
a portion of
I ntermou nta i n
RE: Rezoning Request of Lot 2, Block 5, Vail
P1 a nni ng Commission Members:
unfortunately, I will not be abte to attend.the meeting at which this request will be heard but hope that my objections will be cleaily stated in this letter.
At present the-subject lot is zoned for a single family dwelling and the applicant wishes to obtain a rezoning to allow for a auit"" J*.rilnl. My main objection
l::]:1]th parking and the accessibility of snow plor.rs to"enter this area during heavy storms. This section of the Frontage Road ifrom Interiochen down to the Ho1 iday Inn) seems tg be qbandoned by munr:cipat, iounty-.na nign,uuy entities.-According.to. County 0fficials, this itretch it soutn rioniage Road is highr.ray right-
3,1;y.I^?r1 the,responsibilitv of keeping it clear farit-on-ih"r. rneir pr"uni wt ll not come down here because it is too narrow and they don't have u prop.. turning access. -consequently, individual snow plow companies muit take the..rponiiu.i tity of clearing the road. .Ingy,in turn,are very reluctant to crear the road as they cou'l d be fined by the highway depariment foi lnteiier"inl.-
If the applicants,request for rezoning is granted, it is almost guaranteed that four more cars will be added to this airead! congeited...i (u-riiirm oi-i,uo.u",per unit). As pointed out in Richard L. De-Gette;s letter of F.bru..y 25, l9g2 to Jim Sayre requesting the.rezoning, this section of Intermountain is leveioped at a density "...far exceeding either cluster or duplex zonint',, and a major parking probiem-is already in exisience. The addition oi tour ftui roto" vehicles would certain'ly make the situation impossible at best during Itre-winter months.
I have seen neither a site plan. nor any development plans for the subject lot but fee'l that more variances vrou'l d be needid in order to buita a ouptex structure. 1.1hat with the f1 ood piain problem to the south,.lack of p.ope.-r"ontage, and possibly a set back probiem if^the building has to be set up on the kno'l t] wnere would the "overflow" parking go? Out on thi street, no doubt.
t?a
Pl a nni ng Commission
March 15. 1982
Page Two
:
At present there is a very hazardous abandoned foundation'l ocated on the site.
The owner has been requested to remove this foundation by the Building 0fficial.
As a point of reference, this foundation was to be removed1ast summer and as yet
no action hds been taken. In Mr. DeGette's letter he states "...Because of thi existing abaondoned foundations on the site, an extreme hardship would be placed
on the owners to modify thgse existing improvements without the ability to build at Ieast a two*unit facility." Basically,this says that they are requesting the
rezoning for matters of economic hardship, which in no way should be any justificatior for granting the rezoning. The owner knew the foundation was there and would
have to be removed rvhen he bought the lot.
In summary, I ain firm'ly opposed to the granting of the rezoning and feel that if granted it wou'l d impede traffic f'l ow, increase the problems of snow remova'l , and
would be a granting based on economic hardship. In addition, the bui'lding of a duplex structure wou'ld most likely open the doors to nore variance requests.
"i;"fu(
lnwn o
r*nfa:.":/.[,cT4t14
pg.eat)L
Communitv Devr{opmenl Department-{
f - ..ri; r: rj I ' I ' aor^'il*tl*cr'rsds q.1ru! L-
4 Heof c42-)I ',t
/l..l ,_51-t ,j;pcil\Zt
/+L E4 - il-tP s 92rrj<-1\
//-J LL,lr..l1 fn-_ TIH.ra_
a- e,PtT) Too
lluc-'l+ '
Ft'ra>/r-\ A E' bd9onnol
FJtLtR- Ta 1{7av tL
fio'ztl P'a f'otJ Cte '-
?2QAT4 6E -
fPfr-* I
,-' ,=-4 )Ll-),>q "f S
ffi '/ ,/ {>
({%
,/ns
?; ,8,){,/rl^^fril
Fl/tr.:'-'- f"^1 FISH F-tu )
q-lc t}X'l - u')' 476-OltV
(,(o
PUBLIC NOTICE
N0TIcE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental commission of
the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section
18.66'060 of the zoning code of the Town of Vail on March zz, 19gz at
3:00 p.m. in the council chambers in the Vail municipal bu.ilding.
Public hearing and consideration of:
l. Request for a rezoning of lot 2, b'lock 5, Vail Intermountain
subdivision in accordance with sections .l8.66.100 through tg.66..|60
of the Vail Municipal code. The proposal is to rezone from Residential
clusler to Low Density t',|ulti-Family (LDMF) to allow the construction
of a two unit faciiity.
Applicant: Richard Torrjsi
2. Request to review and amend the Vail Village urban Design Guide plan--
Design considerations in the "Views" section. Request includes addition
of some new view corridors, deletion of some existing view corridors
and a'l tering the classification (major or mjnor) of some view corridors.
Also included is a proposai to change the wording of the view section
of the Design considerations for vail village as well as a proposal
to have "official " photographs of each view corridor.
Appl icant: Town of Vail .
3.
OC
CON/I/ERCIAL, INDUSTR At AND INVESTN4ENT FEAL ESTATE
March 2, 1982
Mr. Jim Sayre
Planning Office
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road Vail, C0 81657
Dear Jim:
RE: Rezon'ing Appl ication on Lot 2, Block 5, Vail Intermountain
Devel ooment
Pursuant to our te1 ephone conversatjons and your meetings with
Richard DeGette, I am enclosing a signed Petition Form for
Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance for the above-captioned site.
As you can see,'it has been signed by the current owner, Michael A. Webb, who, as you know, has contracted with me to sell the property subject to our being ab1 e to get it rezoned to bui1 d
two units.
Dick DeGette is in the process of attempt'i ng to get a current
survey to you by l4arch 15.
It'is our understanding that our case will be heard before tne
Planning Commission at 2:00 p.m., Monday, March 22 in the Council
Chambers at the Town of Vail.
It is our further understanding that our case will subsequently be
heard by the Vai I Town Council at 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, April 6 ior final decision. If any of the these times are altered, I would
appreciate your calling me at 292-3700.
Thank you for your interest and cooperation and your apparent willingness to want to help to turn a current liab.i lity into a productive asset for the Town of Vail as wel'l as an improvement to the adjoining property o\{ners.
Richard M. Torrisi
RMT/ ba b
Encl osure c: Richard L. DeGette
oNt PARK CENTBAL . r5 r 5 ARAPAHOE STFEET . DENVER COLORADO 80202 . PHONE (303) 292-3700 tB
an AlvlBf{OS comoanv
o(
RICHARD L. DeGETTE AIA
280 oETROTT ST DENVER. CO 80206 303-399.0280
February 25, l9B2
Mr. Jim Sayre
City of VaiI
Community Development
Vail, Colorado
Dear Mr. Sayre:
The Petitioner, the owner, and myself request an amendment
to the zoning ordinance to zone the property in the Inter-Mountain
Subdivision described in the attached petition to Low Density Multi-
family (LDMF) District as described in Chapter lB.16, for the following
reasons:
The cluster zoning on the property does not allow for duplexes
in Lots under 15,000 square feet.
All adjacent properties on the north side of Gore Creek are
constructed at a density far exceeding either cluster or
duplex zoning.
The properties on the south side of the stream are all zoned
and constructed as primary/secondary buildings minimum.
All other conditions of square footage, parking access, etc., can
.be met with ease and an appropriately designed property would
be much more in keeping with the scale and nature of the adjacent
prcperties.
Because of the existing abandoned foundations on the site, an
extreme hardship would be placed on the ownerrs to modify
these existing improvements without the ability to build at
least a trvo unit facility.
Exhibits will be put forth to illustrate the nature of the area,
including the scale and impact of the building on this site prior
to the meeting date.
co n s id er atio n.
RLD/jed
l.
,
3.
5.
o.
o(
ROBERT A. ARMON AIA K€VIN E. KREUZ AIA
BOX 1230 EAGLE, CO 81631 303-328-2340
DeGETTE
ABMON
KREUZ
ARCHITECTURE
AND PLANNING r-ro
REPLY TO OENVER
RICHARD L. OeGETTE AIA
280 DETROTT ST DENVER, CO 80206 303-399{280
o(
FOBERT A. ARMON AIA KEVIN E, KREUZ AIA
BOX 1230 EAGLE, CO 61631 303-328.2340
DeGETTE.
ARMON
KREUZ
ARCHITECTURE
AND PLANNING r"ro
February 25, LgBz
Mr. Jim Sayre
City of VaiI
Community Development
Vail, Colorado
Dear Mr. Sayre:
Enclosed you will find the cover letter, application, and check
for rezoning on the Intermountain. The addresses of tle adjacent
property owners, and the signed application from the owner will be
in by next week, and will be forwarded to you.
Thank you for your assistance.
AIA
RLD/ jed
Sincerely,
REPLY TO DENVEB
or',
Information from Eagle County Assessorrs office. 328-73U (2 l26 lBZ)
u.. Lot 6, Block 6, VaiI Intermountain DeveLopment Subdivision
Susan A. Corrock
:Bkk 3583
rf*ffcoto"*do BI65B
Lot 7, Block 6, Vail Interm,tuntain Development Subdivision
James B, and Judith E. Hayhurst
Dean and Cora Sargent
William Rodebush
6960 E. Euclid Place
Englewood , Colorado B0Il0
Flussheim Townhouse #5
L"T Blair D. Howard
I28 North Pitt
Alexandria Ya. 22314
l< f4J AyLD 4Lr>
L3A'7 b
(Pqr*)/
,JJ R.,)
c-2 Lo .
Pe4c-L
9ec'lc? |
'/o ,a)7< /s7g
r'fttw ) CP
(tr.i, . ,), ,' t"-/-'
l7ont:_f i l/r__,/
9tor6
o 2-0
t\r'ot o(
7r Petl.tton Or@
PETITION FORI,I FOR AIiIENDI.IENT To IEE zoNING oRDINAIICE
OR
REQT'EST FOR A C}IANGE rN DrS?RrCT BOT'NDARTES
I.This procedure is reguired for any amenclment to or for a reguest for a district borurdary change
the zonlng ordlnance
A. NAl,iE OF PETITIONER
One Park Cen
AItoRtsS 1515 Arapahoe Street, Sujte 1600, Denver, C0 gOZOz PHONa 292-3700
B. NA}18 OF PETT?TONERIS REPRESENTA?TVE RICHARD L. DeGETTE
ADDRESS 280 Detroit Street, Denver, C0 BtlZ06 PEONA 399-0280
C. AUTHORTZATTON OF PROPERTY OWNER
SIGNATURE A.
D.
,('l E'
{," *."lvl 7F.
ADDRESS P.0. Box 3114 Bahia llar llarina Ft. Laudgrdale, FL 133$lfore
LOCATION
EDDRESS
cnae .we
OF PROPOSAI,
DG,Af Sgi!ffi"ttfr*,,.,=q. , br""k i, v. +evebpr-'rea'g
cEr rvltlrrrT t|Ar ^rr^^,,F SEE EXIJIBIT "A'' ATTACHED HERETO AIID HEPCBY ||TAD
Sf00.00 plus g& tot each property owner to be notified.
A list of the names of ownere of subject property, and their uailing
a1l property adjacent to tlre
addresscs .
./\o(.(
EXHIBIT ''A''
To that certain Contract dated September 21, 1981 , by and
between RICHARD M. T0RRISI, WITH RIGHT T0 ASSIGN, as
Purchaser and MICHAEL A. I,IEBB, as Seller' concerning
property known as Approximately 3,000 South Frontage Road
l,lest, Vail, Co'lorado.
Legal Description:
A portjon of Lot 2, Block 5, VAIL INTERM0UNTAIN DEVEL0PMENT SUBDMSION,
described as follows:
Beginning at the Wester'ly Corner of said Lot 2, thence N. 53 degrees, 35
minutes, 06 seconds E. along the Southeasterly Right-of-tlay line of
Interstate 70, a distance of 114.46 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
thence S. 21 degrees, 50 minutes, 31 seconds E. a distance of 52.24 feet;
thence S. 04 degrees,53 minutes,00 seconds W., a distance of 50.02 feet;
thence S. 38 degrees,00 minutes,00 seconds W., a distance of 84.19 feet
to a point on the Southerly line of said Lot 2; thence N. 61 degrees, 18
mjnutes,30 seconds 8., a'long the Southerly line of said Lot 2, a distance
of 44.20 feet; thence N. 75 degrees, 38 minutes, E., along the Southerly line of said Lot 2, a distance of 49.68 feet to the nost easterly corner
of sa'i d Lot 2; thence N. 35 degrees, 06 minutes, 00 seconds I^,1., along the
Northeasterly'l ine of said Lot 2, a distance of 196.95 feet to the most
Northerly corner of said Lot 2; thence S. 53 degrees, 35 minutes, 06 seconds
l{. along the Southeasterly Right-of-Way line of Interstate 70, a distance
of 50.90 feet to the Point of Beginning, Town of Vajl, County of Eag1e,
State of Colorado,
with al1 its appurtenances, and warrants the title to the same,
known as Approximate'ly 3,000 South Frontage Road West.
o o
FLUSSHE IM TOI,IINHOUSES
P.O. Box 1874 Vai1, Colorado 81657
May 25,1981
Mr. Steve Patterson
Building Inspector
Town of Vai-1 Vai1. Colorado 81657
RE:East Portion of Lot 2, elock 5
Vail Intermountain Subdivision
Dear Mr. Patterson:
Enclosed please find some photographs of an abandoned foundation located on the eastern portion of Lot 2, Yai-I Intermountain.
llle, in the Flussheim Complex, find this to be not only unsightly but also a safety llrazatd. As this is located between the Interlochen Complex and Flussheim, both of which house sma1l children,
we feel that this is potentially a very dangerous situation and request that the Town of Vail take the necessary steps to help us alleviate this situation.
Any assistance you can appreciated. If we can be
any questions, please feel or Mark Fisher at 476-5584.
give us in this matter would be greatly
of any assistance to you or if you have free to contact either myself at 476-0387
Thank you.
-/nLnceTeAy, /\ /l /_.,tf i///- / " /
./U / ta12L4-
.JO Ualvre
3 oo 6 Vr n;TW
enc.t0sures
L,-^f
.:
,--/.
*/€
CI (-o
NOTICE AND ORDER
FOR DEMOLITION
IN THE MATTER OF THE
INCOMPLETE AND DANGEROUS
BUILDINGS LOCATED ON
LOT 2, BLOCK 5, VAIL
INTERMOUNTAI N SUBDiV ISION
TO: MICHAEL A I,IEBB
BOx 3tt4
FORT LAUDERDAIIE, FL 33316
KINDLY TAKE NOTICE that the Town of Vail Building Official in accordance with
the Uniform Building Code, 1982 Edition, as adopted by the Town of Vail and
the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1982 Edition, has
inspected the following descrjbed site:
Lot 2, Block 5, Vail Intermountain Subdivision
commonly known as 2988 S. Frontage Rd. West.
Upon inspection it was found that the conditions of the foundations on the
site render the site dangerous under Section 302 of the Uniform Code for the
Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1982 Edition, as fo'l 'l ows:
(i) There is steel re-bar protruding from the unfinished foundation
lJalls. Sec. 302 e (iv)
(2) The unfinished foundatjon walls of the buildings are unprotected'
and people jn the area could fall into unprotected areas. Sec.302 12-(i)
(3) The incomplete foundation and the surrounding site are littered
with trash, debris, and construction materials which provide breeding and hiding
areas for pests, varmits, and vermin. Sec. 302 18
(4) The surrounding site in thejr open and unprotected state are
an attractive nuisance for children. Sec.302 12-( i)
(5) The littered and unfinished building and the surround'ing site
are a health and safetv hazard for the residents and visitors of the Town of Vail.
Sec. 302 18
The Town of Vail Building 0ffjcial has determined that the incomplete buildings
are unsafe and shall not be occupied or otheruise used in their present condition.
You and each of you are hereby ordered to obtain the necessary and proper demolition
permits from the Town of Vail on or before January 9, 1983 and the incomplete,
dangerous buildings including all foundations and structures removed withjn 45 days
of this notice.
, JiOr tr.r ,i:;:) 0RtJr-R | 0P. rf I rfllr
tr
If the required der:rolition is not coi ,jlr:rtcr:d as herein rr'rlrrir{)d, the
Bujlding 0fficia'l will order the incomplete, dangerous buildings, including
all foundations and structures posted, and hc may cause the vrork to be done and
charge the costs thereof against the ovtners of the property'
Any person having any record title or 1ega1 jnterest in the building may
appeai thjs Notice and order to the Board of Appeals, provided the App.eal is
made jn vrriting as provided by the uniform code for the Abatement of Dangerous
Bui'ldings, 1982 Edition, and filed with the Building Official within thjrty (30)
days of the date of this Notjce and 0rder. Failure to appeal wil constjtute a
l]llaiver of atl rights to an admin'i strative hearfng and determination of the matter'
Dated:
CERTIFICAT OF MAILINb
State of Colorado ))ss
County of Eagl e )
I, Qary Murrgin , , herebv,:uitifl-llu!-l^:T :I"i^tl:"3:: :i :9..{:::t and
, and that I have caused to be served b-y majling'am not a partyto thl , h__--L-.- ,.t 1^o.r .."iif i"a'p;;il;. -prepaid,
"etrtn re-ceipt-reqYe:l' on- DegemPe:l ?,:r'1182 ;.fu;ii;;.Ji"d.i".'iol-oerioriiionottnbrounaitionslffik5'
Vuii fntui*ountain Subdivision, a copy of which appears on -uhe foregoing.' Said
ilke place at U.S. Post Office '. Vail. 9olgrado , on or about -ii".6*t"r i, rffiu 'u'
Subscribed and slorn to bbfore me this //-&-of
- d-tlz :ez <:J.La)
ro
-2o*, 4Z-"" /a-d-
TdTARyZUBI- I C
/nt ea 721rd ,
I
V7
n:,rtri'..rrn | \ i-, -,r '- i ',' :-U
f'\ -' 'r !. t- -.'t L ! !'J
De,.i' cl F::irxi[:: L Del01'
f4igr CostliY. Cols
E* 1rt.r,
L $^ , Jt 4 zv-1s,7r.
D ;." {i \-lbL,- flu /1aa*4,
&t /^-"r'*ao/e #o
,t l( ,l e.'V .
A,+* t J*' l"tru
ft'l 6 J." J ^E-t< Jnn Qtt'v"tt'--:ft 4! *4V
v t' t t7 Yrr*b 4 Y^J { * /u'L}'rn<}'^t'c (7'^
J {o,* /u-
@t^*/g *J/ ftt*<a.^^et o( io -ttt a"nI
Yrt* /," & n* rYr'<^/ a'' 4' fU"'(
"J, # ;{",. fu /^t * 8<4';( cL- 'ff'U
N' .A$&ri t4 c't":t ec'^s'>ft-n cw tJct
14" ,clteu.,*r{*".1 Ji s* / f q, J* t*"lz(
k,ri .1''* "'1rA,/,r / t 'L-* J /Ltt
ht{
THI ' zfa"t' 'J(o '
S,-r-r1r,
f"l* t!/l
EAGI.E COUISTY
Communi tY Dev'l eoPment
P.0. Box 179
EAGLE, COLORADO 81631
TELEPHONE 303/328-731|
BOARO OF COUNTY
coMMtsStoNERs
Ext 24 |
ADMINISTRATION
Ext 241
ANIMAL SHELTER
949-4292
ASSESSO R
Exl2O2
BUILDING IN
I N SPECT IO N
Ext 226 or 229
CLERK &
RECORDER
Ext 217
COUNTY
ATTO R N EY
E t 242
ENGINEER
Ext 236
ENVI RONMENTAL
HEALTH
Ext 238
EXT E N5IO N
AG ENT
Ext 247
LIBRARY
Ext 255
PUBLIC HEALTH
Eag le Ext 25 2
Vail 476-5844
PLAN N I NG
Ext 226 or 229
PURCHASING/
PERSONNEL
Ext 245
ROAO & BRIDGE
Ext 257
SHERIFF
Eag le Ext 2l I
Basalt 927-3?44
Gilman I2 7.5 751
SOCIAL sER V ICES
328-6328
TREASURER
Ext 20 |
6 December 1979
Mi chae'l l.lebb
Box 3114
Bamia Mar Marina
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316
Re: File No. 7v-75-79
Dear Sir:
The reasons that your Variance was denied are stated as
fol I ows :
1) Your appljcat'ion did not sufficiently demonstrate
that the conditions of Section 9.04.06, items 1
thru 5 of the tagle County Zoning Resolution existed.
2) If the building were a duplex, more traffic would be
generated than the area could handle.
Appeal of the decision of the Zoning Board of Adjustment goes
to District Court within 30 days after the decision of the
Board. It would be wise for you to apply for a Variance,
build a single family home, or se1 I the lot.
Zoning in Intermountain 'is not likely to change within the
future.
Please note that ail correspondence was sent to the address
on the application for a Variance, which was Box 1187' Vail
Col orado, 81657
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Jim tlil l iams
Zoning Inspector
Jtl/adj
-<- VARIANCE APPLICATION riru*o.L-{:fS'!!
..
Action of Zoning Boa
Approval E . conditions I
oenial d
reasons: (
't, Tk€-r-o -{1 z,&
I
EflL t,)
Date, fx
Note: Sect
Any
. mad{
that
fol lo
ft[CEIVID
DL(],.,o 1379
D€91. ol Pldnnrng & D:vol'
f,rglg. CoutrtY, gqq'
/o Bw 3il*,
BAu,o ,lk( l'tutt*'\,
&e.r L*lrt\ar-,
Ftn fist L-
9l Alc,;'lQ
fr(" + z( - 7r- q"7 .
J /n t '.^b Just 'trcc)'*o(
,tdt,r- n**'cc t /we '.( I te{)+ '('* ft a'
u
A/c-t(.l^-tt ,f .t-- "A i"* * J 'Jex/"^'^/ '{"'l W
ff'&'cr-ha^ g!^ ^ ,yni1 slviance 'o'' 1t-ne'(
';^,* /'* 6*aot
-$"'"ng ot*"'u#"fr i
lJl*/ ,loet {*} /L\ecL* t{ ufu4 oc\\'J ^6<')
oh L "'-f/r& - J' lt* J^^*:J
('?b * J'V"
?.' ftr* a,'<c' .,1 { no t^tift :-( 'nY * a^*e ;F
/o'rtu tr lr-lie,-t* k ulh'"'/ * &'L/ c^
d"yi+, W e'te e n'^l',ti t''<tu/a^lle 6{
t,tted.to,'r)cJ * &";&1 aL su',/, tv(,',{e..ls .^ ,
t, | ,,. t arti"S Sc-tct-*'&ci I a-tttfy'e hdfr cv. 4*'*/(+"^
/L'/,r' f'aa Sar**, I/rt-"( ,4 tU{/
J.,* $rt ,
Pa:: 2 (.f 2
EAGTE COUh'-"
Deparrmenr of plalin;* ."Oevelopmenc
P. - O. Box 179
EAGLE, COLORADO 81631
TELEPHONE ! 303/328-731 |
BOARD OF COUNTY
coMMrSSrONERS
Ext 241
ADMINISTRATION
Ext 24t
ANIMAL SHELTER
949-4292
-.1
A5S ESSO R
Ext 2O2
BUI LDING IN
I NSPECT IO N
Ext 226 or 229
CLERK &
RECORDER
Ext 2l7
COUNTY
ATTORNEY
Ext 242
ENGINEER
Ext 236
ENVIRONMFNTAL
HEALTH
Ext 238
EXT EN 5IO N
AG ENT
Ext 247
LIBRARY
Ext 25 5
PUBLIC HEALTH
Eagle Ext 2 52
Vail 476-5844
PLAN N I NG
Ext 226 or 229
-----j---J 4-*-*,%*a
Susan Vaughn 0
o
16 August 1979
Michael Webb P. O. Box 1187 Vail, Colorado 81657
At their Public Meeting of August 15, L979, the Eagle
County Planning Couunission reconmended denial of your
request for variance to the minimum lot size, because
the applicant did not sufficienEly demonstrate that the
conditions of'Section 9.04.06, 1 thru 5 of the Eagle County
Zonlng lesolution -exist .
Thl-s recormnendation will be forwarded to the Zoning Board
of Adjustment on September L3, -L979 at .10-:00 A.M.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
PURCHASING/
PE RSONN EL
Ext 245
ROAD & BR IOG E
Ext 257
SHERIFF
Eagle Ext 2l I
Basall927-3244
Gilman 827-575'l
SOCIAL SERV ICES
328-6328
TREASURER
Ext 201
Planner
Sv/kp
cc: ZonLng Board of Adjustment
Sincerely
AITACTIMH\TT TO IIAPPLICSTION TOR \ARfANCE'I
Paragraph 6: As allovied unden Section 9.04.06, I - 5 of the County Zoning Resolution the subj ect variance should be granted for the follcrdng reasons:
l-. That a hardship wiIL exi-st financially if a dupJ-o< is not allcrred because of financial obligations ard pnoperty is in a muLti unit area ard an alrnost
]-evel lot.
4. The variance requested will not increase the density in the neighborhood,it wilr not diminsh the value, use or enjolment of adjacent pnoperties. rt wil-l not destroy or dsn-inish light, air and open sl>ace in the nei-gtrlcortrood.
The developens plan will provide attractive building designs ilcluding pleasant
lardscaping ameniLies and feels will inprove the site as an old fourdation fon five units e><ists on the lxoperty at this tjme. A ner^/ structr:re ard lardscaping trould improve the site.
5. The proposed variance wilJ. not, in the jr:dganent of the developens,
represent an act strncifically contrary to the resolution or master plan but rather ccrnplinent the neighborhood and if anything acts to u1ry.rade tlre neighbortrcod.
Bk.
223
263
247
223
228
Page
2
qsg
I
B
B
4
515
810
40
918
220
49
226
250
INTERLOCHEN
Bldg.
A lovejcy, Linda & Brent
3100 S. Sheridan Blvd.
Suite 7
Denver, Co 80227
A Yates, Stephen & Fred
bx LL72
Vai1, CO 8L657
A Andre, Paul W. & Ilene
Box 3368
Vai1, CO 8f657
A Kubby, Karen B.
Box 536
Vai1, CO 8L657
P.
B q2 226
940
82
227
226
227
44L
Emeson, Iran & Jcan M.
7002 E. Walsh
Denver, CO 8L657'
Whitchurch, B.L. & Doris J.
9210 W. llrh Sr.
Lakewood, CO 802f5
tlilkens, F. D.
75 Manhattan Drive
Boulder, C0 80303
Gi]ido, Nicholas & Gladys
6624 S. Sicarmore St.
LitEtL,eton, Co 80U0
English, R. Edward
6800 E. Tennessee Ave.
Denver, CO 80222
Sullivan, Judith E. & Norsworthy,
2937 S. ForesE ST.
Denver, CO 80222
Bartlett, Jamie R. & Kathryn
2630 Oakwood Dr.
Olympia Fields, IL 6046I
Peete, Don C. & Jeane E.
3508 W. 71st St.
Prarie Village, Kansas 66208
B 26L 263/29 L62
'273
227
227 239/281 652
258
247
227
276
233 297
327 Layton, Robert G. & Kathryn
%Amen Richard D-J
4021 S. Ivanhoe Lane
Englewood, CO 80111
Smith, C. Gordon & Jayne B.Il0 Sheridan St.
Rockford, IL 61103
Gange, Linda leign
Box 551 Vail, CO 8L657
Condbesini, Susan F.bx L472 Vail, CO 81657
fsg6ill, John N. & Virginia C.
4137 S. Sheridan Blvd.
Denver, CO 80235
MiILer, Mark M. & Helen A., Mark A.
1601 Harmony Hill Dr.Lufin, TX 7590L
VisEa Nueva Associates,(McAtee, PaEicia A.)
877 E. Panama Dr.
LitEleton, CO 80Ul
Richard, Kenyra g lillnsn, Richard
2467 S. Dover Wav
Lakewood, CO 86227
Decette, Vicbria
1075 Monaco Parkwav
Denver, CO 80220
Bachmann, Fedor & Edith I.
Route Du. Signal 2l
1018 lousanne
Switzerland
.Iohnson, Norma W. & Carolyn J.
22II S. AlEon Way,
Denver, CO 80231
Boulder InEerlochen Assoc.
7. W.T. Walker
1301 Spruce St.
Boulder, CO 80302
Verbrugge, Joseph & Anne
6165 W. Pair Ave
Englewood, C0 80110
B
B
10
11
356
193 2t48
226 B 13 916
B 14 42L
I_)B
B
l_o
17
19
oqz
443
364
473
L74
236
232
19 L74 276
238 306
o
3 232 642 C Ger Map Co.
Box 300b8
Dallas, TX 75230
262 22L 4 C Holt, Harol-d & LavetEa
37541 S. Niagara Way
Denver, CO 80237
232 972 5 C Bryant, Edward & Margorie
2135 S. Elkhart St.
Aurora, CO 800f4
256 12 6 C Jones, George N.
Box 2041
Vail, CO 81657
235 7U+ 7 C Johnson, A. Paul
Box 2165 Vail, CO 81657
263 478 8 C Fontana, Luke & SaILy
824 Esplande Ave.
New Orleans, LA 7OlL6
256 789 1 D Canada's of Vail, Ltd.bx 276 Vail, C0 8L657
264 155 2 D Pollard, James M. & Hicks, Larry A.
2360 30rh sE.
Boulder, CO 81301
233 302 3 D Baldwin, E1len t^l .
1520 Buckingham Dr.
Lincoln, NE 68506
24I 588 4 D TuI[, James H.
1301 Spruce
Suite 301
Boulder, CO 80302
276 20 5 D Forli-zi, Jchn
Box 3147 Vall, C0 81657
239 4L0 6 D Gold, Fred E. & Judith B.
Box 514 Vail, CO 8L657
260 933 7 D Tagg, Susan J., Benbon E. & Shirley D.
4850 E. Alabama Pl
Denver, CO 80222
264 L76 8 D leavitt, Robert
740 S. Colorado Blvd.
Denver. CO 80222
Block 6 Bellflower Subdivision:
Iot (3) llinger, R. C'ordon Jr.
12157 E. Amherst Circle
Denver, CO 80232
(4) Quayle, Wm. L. & Wm. H.
741 North Braebrrn Rd.
Palatire, IL 60067
(5) ttibb, Craig L. & Han L.
Box 591 !eit, CO 81657
(6) Co:rock, Susan A.
Box 3583 yail, C0 8IA5l
lot z-Block 5-FLUSSHEIM tr--6r6n Ellinger
12157 E. Amherst Cr.
Denver, CO 80232
Kramer, Jc Ellen
Box 1874 Vail, Co 81657
Fisher, Ier M. & Edith
Box 995 Vail, C0 81b57
Parks, Charles H.
Box 1908 Vail, CO 8L657
. Howard, Blair D.u8 N. Pift Sr.
Alexandria, Virginia
EAGI.E COI'NTY o and Department of Planning
P n R.'rr 17Q
EAGfE, Co'[bHA6o I163r
TELEPHONE 303/328-73 | I 16 August 1979
BOARO OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
Ext 241
AOMINISTRATION
Ext 241
AN'MAL'HELTER The Vail Trail 94s-42s2 'rP. 0. Box 10 r'^iI, Colorado 8L657 ASSESSOR Y CI'
Ext 202
BU I LD ING IN
I NSPECTIO N
Ext ??6 or 229
6LERK & Re: Notice of Public Hearing REcoRDER Zoning Board of Adjustment Ext2t7 15 september L979
CO UNT Y
ATTORNEY
Ext 242
F}"jSE* Please publish the attached notice of Public Hearing as a Legal Notice in the 23 September 1979 publication of
ENVTRONMENTAL yOUr PaPer.HEALTH
Ext 238 Please bill and send affidavit of publication to this office
EXTENSIO N
AGENT
Ext 247
LIBRARY
Ext 255
PUBLIC HEALTH
Development
Eagle Ext 252 vair476-s844 Thank t").,
t E:li'I'|,i" '- )..----. '" I
F!s,'Js,is", <^##r{'ffi*
Ext 245 Office Manager
ROAD & BRIOGE
Exl 257
SHERIFF
Eagle Ext 2l I
Basalt 927-3244
Gilman 827-5751
sOC IA L SERVICE5
328-6328
TREASURER
Ext 20 |
O
"orr.E oF PUBLT. "ro*r*dO COUNTY OF EAGLE, COLORADO
Notice is Hereby Given that the Eagle County Zoning
Board of Adjustment will hold a Public Hearing beginning at 10:00 A.M. on 13 September L979, in accordance with Section
9.O4 of the Eagle County Zoning Resolution. Said Hearing will include the following:
File No.
Reques t :
Location:
Zv-75-79 - Michael Webb
Variance Eo Section 9.04.06 Section 6, of the
Eagle County Zoning Resolution - minimum lot size in the RSM zone.Vail Intermountain Subdivision, Lot 2, Block 5
This Hearing will be held in the McDonald Building, County
Commissioners MeeEing Roorn lt1-03, 550 Broadway, Eag1e, Colorado.
Persons being affected by a decision on this request are invited to make coments to the Board by appearing at the Hearing, or by submitting written statements in person or by mail thru the
Secretary
Further information may be obtained or comments submiEted,by contacting the Eagle County Department of Planning and
Development, 550 Broadway, Eagle, Colorado Phone 328-731-L
by' Katherine Peterson
Secretary
Prcsent zone ft- S U
Gengral location of property (in relation to a Town, Road, Strearn or otlrer lanCmark):
3000 South !?ontage Road West, ftocated on frontage road and betrreen
frontage road and Core Creek, appro<irnately 3r: rniles west of Vail.
4. L6gal description of property
Survey is attached.
a. Subdivisicn N3meflai-L_Int@untajr Lot 2 Blx-__l_, or,
b. met.::s and bounds (may be attached) include survey or nlap:
5. Brief Furpose and Reason for Variance (may be attacheci):
r,vould l-ike a varj_ance to h-li1d a duple><
Attach e)F!a.1ation that one or more conditions- exist_under
(See Attachsnent )
St3tement: { l
6.
all ov/ners o,'6!j adjecent properties is attached hereto; this signatory is properiy
er-rthcrized t
Signature of [TFoiized applicent; o./ner?
Application acccpted as complete for Public Hearing on
Appt ication rejected as incomplcte for Pubt ic Hearing
lard zoned RSM and
. .,r_ :Y, r.
l'"']li:l?:,Y?'a '"
oecauso:
A complete list oi atl owners addresses, of the property proposed for Variance and of
(rcjmirtistt .rtor
Pirgc 1 of 2
aka4e_