HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL INTERMOUNTAIN BLOCK 6 LOT 6 LEGAL FILE.pdfDesign Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of CommuniW Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 tax: 97O.479,2452
web: www.vailgov.com
Project Name: Peters addition
Project Description:
Additions including an attached one-car garage, living room, dining room, deck and front porch,
Participants:
owNER PETERS, FMNCINE & A|-AN 0412912008
20 FOREST HILL RD
TORONTO, ONTARIO M5P2P7
APPUCANT CARL MUELLER 04 I 29 /2008 Phone: 97 0-47 6-2627
Project Address: 2955 BELLFLOWER DR VAIL Lo€ation: LOT 6, BLOCK 6, VAIL INTERMOUNTAIN
Legal Description: Lot:6 Blockl 6 Subdivision: VAIL INTERMOUNTAIN
Parcef Numbeft 2L03-L43-0700-7
Comments:
DRB Numb€r: DR8080123
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By! Dantas
Second By: DuBois
Vote: 5-0-0
Conditions:
Action: APPROVED
Date of Approval: 05/2112008
Cond: B
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
(PLAN): DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of
approval, pursuant to the Vail Town Code, Chapter 12-3-3: APPEALS.
Cond: 202
(PIAN): Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following
the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is
commenced and is dlligently pursued toward completion.
Cond: CON0010014
The applicant shall repaint the entire structure with the approved colors as
follows: The siding shall be Glidden Golden Tower and the trim shall be Glidden
Creme Brulee,
Planner: NicolePeterson DRB Fee Pald: 33O0.OO
,-ffi
PROJECT ORIENTATION
MEMBERS PRESENT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
PUBLIC MEETING
May 21, 2008
3:00 P.M.
Gouncil Ghambers
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Golorado, 81657
MEMBERS ABSENT
2:30pm
No Site Visits
PUBLIC HEARING _TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Fischer Residence DR8080120 / 5 minutes
Final review for a new primary secondary residence
3796 Lupine Drive/Lot 7, Bighorn 2"o Filing
Applicant: Steven Fischer, represented by John Martin Architecture
ACTION:
MOTION:SECOND:VOTE:
GONDTT|ON(S):
2. Peters Residence DR8080123 / 15 minutes
Final review for an addition of GRFA (garage)
2995 Bellflower Lane/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Applicant: Francine and Alan Peters, represented by Carl Mueller
AGTION:
MOTION:SECOND:VOTE:
STAFF APPROVALS
Landmark Condominiums DRB0801 1 0
Final review for an addition of GRFA (townhouse units)
610 West Lionshead Circle/ Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3
Applicant Landmark Condominium Association, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects
Lionshead Ski School DRB0801 31
Final review for a minor alteration (fagade)
536 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Co, represented by Melik & Associates
3:00pm
Bitl
Nicole
Bitl
Bitl
Page 1
Columbine Company DR8080104 Warren
Final review on exterior changes (living room)
600 Valley View Drive/Block B, Northwoods Condominiums
Applicant: Columbine Company, Ltd, represented by Nedbo Construction
Vanoyan Residence DR8080136 Rachel
Final review on exterior changes (patio)
433 Gore Creek Drive/Lot 10, Block 4, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Alise Vanoyan, represented by Atlas Construction
Jones Residence DR8080138 Rachel
Final review for a minor alteration (landscaping)
1031 Eagles Nest Circle/ Lot 1 , Block 1, Vail Village Filing 8
Applicant: Evan Jones, represented by Jeremy Bowman
Golf Terrace LLC Residence DRB080139 Rachel
Final review for a minor alteration (window well)
1635 Golf Terrace #431 Lot 1 , Block 2, Sunburst Filing 3
Applicant: Golf Terrace LLC represented by J Krueger and Company
Forbes RealEstate DR8080140 Rachel
Final review for a minor alteration (a/c screening)
292 E Meadow Drive, Unit 101/1O3/Tract B, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Mountain Haus 101 LLC, represented by Heid Custom Builders
Weigers Residence DR8080141 Rachel
Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof)
785 Potato Patch Drive/ Lot22, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch
Applicant: George and Elizabeth Weigers, represented by George Shaeffer Construction
VailResidence DRB080108 Nicole
Final review for an addition of GRFA (fami|y room)
770 Potato Patch Drive/ Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch
Applicant: George and Beverly Vail, represented by Beth Levine, Architect, Inc.
Lionshead Arcade DR8080125 Warren
Final review for a minor alteration (door)
531 E Lionshead Circle/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1
Applicant: Robert Lazier, represented by Alliance Restoration
Raether Residence DR8080107 Bill
Final review for a change to approved plans (windows)
227 Rockledge Rd/ Lot 13, Block 7, VailVillage Filing 1
Applicant: Paul Raether, represented by Beth Levine, Architect, Inc.
Johnson Residence DR8080133 Warren
Final review for repair of existing structure (deck)
2566 Cortina Lane/Lot 2, Block D, Vail Das Schone Filing 1
Applicant Gregg & Beverly Johnson
Page2
Additions-Residential or Commercial
Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
Leli 970.479.2128 faxi 970.479.2452
web: www-vailoov.com
General Information:
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to
the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot De
accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need
to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses
unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval.
Do.cription of the Reques1a, DFil6N
Apprtrcrr ( Pe<obootg
Location of the Proposal: Lot:b stock: 6 subdivision: VAIL blFtilt',ld/rVlfrl9 €,1b,
Physical Address:LqsS Obu^pweL
parcel No.: LloTl*?ol^oT (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
Name(s)orowner(s): V+*6{b tbtfJLt Ae firtdl Vgrffi}g
Mailing Addressl
Name of Applicant:
hkbygpylyl
ltlr Forrl? 'tttw|\a
Mailing Address:mvallcfcerl € corrcqst.n"
Owner(s) Signature(s) :
E-mail Address:
Phone:
Fax:
Type of Review and Fee:
Signs
Conceptual Review
New Construction
Addition
Minor Alteration
(multFfamily/commercial)
Minor Alteration
(single-family/duplex)
X
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.
No Fee
$650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.
$300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
$250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining
walls, etc.
$20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining
walls, etc.
Changes to Approved Plans $20 For revisions to plans al
Review Board.
SeDaration Reouest No Fee
by Plannirig Staff qt
j
lllt 'j ill
For Office^lse Only
FeePaid: Mt'
Meeting Date: 5.
Check No.:
Planner:
the Design
,t{
.{
LoT 5
Vot 7
?,*afa @st&o
F-utS UNtf
< rooo ffi,tr.
MAIP Utrlf
> 2mfr,fr,a !aa/ 6a,?r,
fotL (Wngtfi
(P?o'eD
Ll e*u- ?tarrr.t ur.rr)
^JouJ
gTo?A<L
DKI\'ELJAY AF9A
(rrar.uOruG P'\nt)
Jttodglq?,A.<de (vrwxrw DFv4
qll +
217+ W@ot?-Lv
ExfSttlrc Wte oF
tof ? PF|$EIIAY
z 9?k(zs
?
'?A{*-s
*,,\*\
-j T,TI rre
I {
5 *tes
4 sr*rzs
?Xte a"
Yoxv
' (vol??
vd'"
qA"Fl NG V*rt \C'ZHE NT P t-A F.l ?l'1 F
6H r
tra &xo.fi Fr -f ?f:"
u*rg
618$6><si
Sy'$ "ess
F.cil
ilJ kRi
D- _l
.u'ul ,r
",,ffi
41lx,V=
l"'-lg:'o'
lor
o,tqa
6
K'w.9
.lt -------'--
V
bazo q
+t++ Q
totE fr
?oo fi
'bzoo il
zEt 6
zqot fi
lEo b
6Ls0
l"lf'Jga_?r?e 'RVC)
u Tl o Fts
forRu *?t*, LoT 6 o,t1e * 1+,6uo --
Kau?',@ LArtvg(A"tlx1 %26x.55 =(urH gHLr;
VttiDtiJo FtN?('tttT *uuo?,fl,' Yroees'r!
^Wgffiif V6er$Jf
^,tffi;Jnffifl (get^rr*'l* gatt)
2*r.ewe/ NorrA aPe
(o{rd\r^ra N+ )
"^1?Jff-t*tr ov+rtses)
lfttq 5o0T>\ rtvE . \(wur*, I orr*s):gsLs fr
LOT 7
o I
s.l
:
N
J s
F
5
\r'!
s
&
$q
\l
J
e
a s\
$
a o-
$
*r&m\
WY
N4trrH
L+.
. orpi??
tu(y"L*ND5CA?E PLAN IP t-l
KET
ER I R;T ?FT -3iiA
YEUr H,ss 6s$r l9 s'3 ><*r.B
vss
F\ .'fr
il *s nI
fa*nr Leoe$D
'kt(erJ'
ruFdLut
1F9+toWrW
nv*o"
1,,= 101,- O"
fi{,y
\
sOrVPt+ \uNe
6H r
Fr$
g$*s
Hrss
$ix. 3
B:fr
Hqs
I
s
(t
t,
-|
F t A
\t\
&
o o
s )
OL s-
s
A N
R d 0-L
\)s
A
tu
VI
&.
'f 2
Ns
s-\i
tv
r
l
I
W)Y oF
vtq l$o,E
9ae$
-
.Lrb
MAIN UNlf
,ov Ttrrv lloo
q,et@,ee W,
(rroor.7t) -
-6w
(#AfolFt
wae#
A
tA
vl s
A-
il
z-
b!
$0-
\
\
?-u'e o(
(rrd{6e
kVQrItotJ
No\E \__tl
W,l9Ibto U?dJu5
1b ff)^tilA
TtFrc L
rt-
1-----J vuam\
h+L.rl
qs%
.F,-l
:-f.|tr
Lld€g Lerrv>
X Dt^ENStobls /\?+ Iv ?JT'W6
oF h}flsl.l W s\r(reY,
VAW L^WL
-
J----tl i|\r---r--l-
vn*?ojw
I
UrrtrN6
T@1
Otz,*L -(ruu ,rrrr)
Al oF?
t16'--lLO'l
Yg* oF tovq (oo( \__r_
VotsPG
v
x
-r'0
c ttl :in
\D
vtt|[g|.t6
tr15**
t-ltfE
Fqrflp6
WtilE 10
9t*
,ftv 6t4A6L
Htl.l.'4 p Oe
Apeeo flL
c(a55.++t(f/llc9
p&t& w*ra
ffeseo 6trtl afrgw.
U}JEg
-tt\
N
vnfiw6
O ApprnoN
AIe @{q,Me
rtrkv
ALwuhQrE
ge24.W * ,L5 --
llo0
7a5
2t564
ll00
+?l
L7'
-VoO
frEw wlr.r,
F1?4FfT
I"V,Y
o
uAt .5 fo ge tweo fl(t(+r
r ,_l vt LK
tr_{t
Y.+fiF\
r,
-_-_{
) ,^ tx't oF tluirl . l. .l L,fir i.
t544 +
w)toft-s fr\tr$e FooTP(tt"
0? t+t'Itt<) 0A W?o'"-v vtfrlr{ b6-9*(+ oA
?P?*QD aUTbrDe tq'VK'h
DlMaJSPr.lt gltrv{ AtrTo
Anuo? oF f4*l"|inr6'A?EA
*?6- O(2)r pfrv?/D To 6,?,F.A,W W' etlr4.ro& StttAIt+nt4,
42 *t
3ur
Fa$
FE6
e et{
H]TB
$}fl I
p:$
Eq*_tsq5__+
MAIN LfuEL
Q+* gxivfir6
O 6f6 APetrltl
amhn s?rbhc(
0V4' *4gt\(*
d4+& wgrlast
6&f* wrxu
FAttl
W=l!on
6FriA {oTALS
ewes4 u6tfr
FsrnfP€
TVAa\L
| * lw-,tcrn ,aokre @rk6e
-W^l61jtllo.tr
?eo?os?P DtfHlN b(I'Qkta 67
?WqAo ovrtwe ffi'grcY,
(O DMedOtortg 9t+ovttt N+'fo
oJrstve aF fPftrN6 -l0tA
T+ftT vWA N?EDfl 6'F,F,A,
FoL W efiy@9fi(a1fin6.
u??W Wrev
6(?*?uJSrttxr
O 6ffn 2tpDlfioN
DrftN %Bhc+
ow+ eaw"
6(?h vtN,v?w
(oqS
5r?
t9L+
qc5
o
o
@
Lrut*
FlAlhl
$w?*
6wA torhL
AtLoAMtE
(pg,uar,r + Eltu)
uNusPD 6.F,F,4,
24$
6L
1q5 F
7os6 il
440+ O
A? q+
rl' 21't'--r- \ I \rry'*' \
8 s
s.l t
=\.1
J
E t I
s sl A
8 s N
J
E
$
s
t D-
$
'll( ffM9rrrtqJJ 0( (trtrtyl
P.lvto lr€ 2vr ve
ft(. A*vOl,
if
WI vew-o1 ffi,rrfi HJl* r
-+l \ l.rtl
,t 0?.fr4o$UI
x,v \9
rU
3$r
Fd$
6F$.
Hqt$fr*t I $ "'3 g .,**l
$ *s
+l ,-S il FS o-5
t/gt'=l''o"
r+ar d
6Hr
FBn IJ-/+/a=-F)*d\<? 3q
Hq$$
16fSr-vs$
$$$il.-S
Sts
,itttut grwer0 $xa4 W
W$ole N9 Pelgr*-Lrt4ft?t(. *A(C P*wtil4 6i*/aAfAV4UPe
+o le, bob * r8.)- lr.? *^vT
,thA6tE. cov&, VP(FAQO
Lrt2. LevAF Ft*tk To Ytr(fL+t FXllnN6
VxW* TFM ePP
VE(nC^t b@g 5t9t'.Xt
To H|crCH Ext5'np6
1'(?t/-''v
veanzfi'' uooos'D$6
VeNet& ril htSuuYrep
6rwae VqgP tJ,t{@l
WSwHCL
ll
-rJ- -11
\ --*|*
erre$o& U6fiT ft(,
e
o
e.l
F :
j
J
F t-i rS )(/)
s
SL A
(s I s\
J
F-
a s{
A \$
$s-s-
.t)s
I
r-l {-
vx,txw h '?921*7 Y
v@o ^ler!tutrlawo tttrrwL4g 1p tlryc+l
PXl9-rlFr6
Fvrwdc cpvo*g:
Stotir6 - <uDDetJ
?ovDe{'fo!.Je&
TAH - 6rrD9EN Chqe O?'nt€€-
94, coL*
'r*/$tEg
cot\c,
E}r[F{
lPfito
45'b vne*.d_ tla* 6
"ot2,+2
|cvrcWe( 1l?'c$c
6pp6e
,J?o5oftr ffo|l
FAIUNG
6x6 ?eer:-
EotJrt+ Y.LYuhr12$
A4 n+
ffi
EtrciErr=R
tnl l,tAY 142ooo
A
TOWN OF VAIL
lo'=l'ou
12-
.FL| w d"a./a.#.Tt|.||oe*!uqt 4o'tr' Oo+so)
hrfrtru.t b*rtr(rtE QttA, VPtPFvPg
Z*IL&vhR, F'i''i,ct[ro At..fr)l txls?N6
V$lt8.toR TBtr^ Ailre
VERfICAL ut@o rts1Nr5
&w, En6rN6
$
E ,
N
J
E
&j fr
s A
8 o N
J
s {
s
A
r$
a f
{
ts
I .L
J,
I
I F F
ew.$o2 wvr 74 r'0r
'tt(Ef
6ft(hde ArtPllq.r
1ffi
6xb W'(S w
bJ?.otr6*f leoi
FAtLttl6
_ffi+
Ir #+t +- -+
A5,r+
Fx\trfN6 79+2,th
f --.lK rL- j
I
I -;r
,I
il rl
;l
'l rl
Jffi
6 t
A
U
ffi A
a M
V}
CL r\
s
r$e6
1$
FT 2t
",t R
E$$:ss
:H.i v- ttr $5 ss
r [J\\o ltt
5K
i tr----:
6Ht {-Fts
a=+
?E$^
H
qI$
i- >'S -,-u$e*
H*fr
Sss
co o o s{t T
N
J 3
E t !s
d(
s$x
cD o s
J I
rc t{
o !t
&.s-$-{
\)
N.
tr{.a ?\il*fa $M4t L @
,Lylz (Epp+. (*Scth
f" ilArc,H gxtsTtFl6
trroov 69erv+)rlfr+o
LjfNDoLlt To Y-llrTaH ensnN6
efialoP, Tp|r{ A}tP {e414L kfoo9 5t9t{G T' MET4H PXI9TI|.J6
ort/ev* -*Wffi*$:)
hr(\+ftvt U+tr€Le bwl, ffiFU@
b,?6&t+t lp,l$
B*ltJ.J6
w-
! ft'
I
I
\
I
I
14
NARTH EILVATIO
AG "(+
F[r 6=+
L+ ( tf\<E3t
HEgI
fr*tr':-
# .oi -+
,- )4q
p$il
ttt *- H
Fq*
o
q sl
z
cP(lVt*.ItAfrAU$e
4o tp-. (aq*a)
l6wrP(f
'YIt'"l6|-'ut$" Y?A?+-V@
L w. uftq.
Ymzt*+
Vpotxrtt lpo{Ffiulr6
I Efl, t4AtFl -fn an
-
2xl2 r*nA# ?M.\A
To l-4AfL$ E (l9nNrc
WrA)oP TRH iiltP
'Je(Tt?<L U@9 St9I.Xt
T2 Mffrql 9xttn^r6
uPalarlt t?ott
FAttrlt6
s I s,l
J *
A? ,'+
WT ELpUpr:I'FI
t4"=l\0"
StDt{a
Wild Honey
30YY 46/304
Golden Tower
40YY 57i258
.l.r:. al . 1. L -,j-
'..::i'i -ri''I:r-
r,r(. i l
Gilfit w#$s
\/ www Glidden com
Naturat & Comtortlng
Old Brorfze
30YY 21/438
ililililililrilrilililtilill|ililililrilil |ffi il lil lillllllil ilil||il
@
Naturat & cogfrtns
30YY 261525
ililililililililtiltililililililtilililililtil ililxtffi tiltilffi
@
tlatural & Comfortino
Treasure Trove -
30YY 38/370
rilil|ililililffi tililffi ililililililililililr1ililililrilffi
@ *''61,frfrW"'n
30YY 46/304
llillilrxilflilililtxtililililtililxil ilililililtilililtilil|
@ *'9,f.W3!*
40YY 571258
ililililtililIrililililrilil rilxtilrililililtil rilrililililrililil
@
Natu'al & Comfoding
Sea Sponge
45YY 69t157
1ilil||ilililil|iltilil|lililililil|ilililililililil|ilfiilffi flil
N @lors Wrownale tc afrial pai(ntuts adnably & r86s1,e 2f/.23
Bonjouf tseige
20YY 49,',176
\,,. l i" l ' ':. l]| i
. .., \t i):; t.);,
.,.i;tl
tGGt S"trsilo. "NS \/ wewcli'i'lan cnm
Natual & Cott torting
Cioar
00YY'i A279
1ilililrililtilililtililil|lilItililililil1ilillilil|||ill|ililil
@ OIIF.STIONS?
Fww.etiOOencom
Natwal & Comforting
Haypenrry
ooYY 22t241
til|flilililil|ililililil ililililtilillliltililllltilillililnilililtl
@ OI]ESIrcNS]
www.Glladen'com
Natural & Confortina
Crbme Brulee
ooYY 26t220
1ffiiltilill|ilililtililililtililil|ffitilil1ililtililtiltilililffi
@ ollLtfloNsi tr>3oo 6LrppE!l
wwwGlidden.com
Natural & Con loflind
Bro n Bao
10YY 35/1d6
ilililtililr illililrilrilltilrilflililtililililIrilililtilil
(ffi) pr.r""".,r,sno.
"NFJ \/ www.Gridden.coln
Natulal & Conrtoftrrg
Bonjour Beige
20iY 49t't76
I lllltilililllililtillltililt ilt lilillililliltiltil lililtffi til||il
@
l{atunl & Comfottlng
Water Chestnut
30YY 621127
illlilt ilil||ilililtiltililtilililtiltililililtiltiltilililtililil|il 117 N@lotsw dgednidtuse@ldyaspslide. m421
Vendaria Vooo
DRs 0g otz3
Yan ul do h- llr cr h.aF" -
5/1/08 4:I4 PM
Ibfir{tt WEtvotttP
UES W?Lol,Jht'.
http://fp.vendaria.com/vpop/VpopViewer.ht...FFFFFF&nm=BZOpener&err-0&title:&pf-t&fr=t Page 1 of 2
,t,
't't 'J
ti'
Hampton Bay small Craftsman Exterior Series I Light Wall Fixture - EL2010OBR at The Home Depot .-t
Yolr c.n ao lt- lr$. c t h.lp.'*
5 / 1/08 4:13 PM
Hampton Bay Small Graftsman
Exterior Series I Light Wall Fixture
Model EL20'l0OBR
$79.00/Each Free Shipping
Quantity:Jl frn:Sm
Online Only
Add to My List
Add to My Registry
q zoom View
Read Reviews Customer Rating I I, wTi, u ,ru,r*
Soutof5
lhverase customer Ratingl ll fi,?i: ffJ,,tff ||i-|r
lllff**flsoutor5l | | |
-
Description
This beautiful exterior wall mount light fixture in an oil rubbed bronze finish and
iridescent art glass will add that unique touch to your home. This one light fixture
comes with a 100 watt bulb. Crafismen series matching pieces include a post light,
hanging light, small wall mount light, medium wall mount light, and landscape path
light.
Craftsman Series
Art Glass
Oil Rubbed Bronze Finish
Bulb included
MFG Brand Name : Hampton Bay
MFGModel #:EL201OOBR
MFG Part#:EL2010OBR
Outdoor Lighting Application : Wall
Specifications
ADA Gompliant : False
Assembled Depth (ln Inches) : 8.27 ln-
Assembled Height (ln Inches) '. 12.8 ln.
Assembled Weight (ln LBS) : 3.48
hftp:/ /www. homede pot.com /w€ bapp /wcs /stores /se rvlet/ProductDispl.. . - 1&catalog ld= 100 5 3&prod uctld = 100 32 3 24 5& N = 10000003 + 9O4Ol+502722 Page I of 3
Hampton Bay Small Craftsman Exterior Series 1 Light Wall Fixture - EL2010OBR at The Home Depot
',. ]
Assembled Width (ln Inches) : 9.25 In.
Bulb Type : Incandescent
Energy Star Compliant : False
Hardwired or Plug -ln : Hardwired
Height : 11.18 In.
Length : 7.95 In.
Maximum Bulb Wattage : 100
Number of Lights/Bulbs : 1
Recommended Base Type : Type A
Shade/Glass Type : Art Glass
Width : 6.89 In.
Product Reviews
Review This Prod uct
1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report Inappropriate Review)
Warranty
Warranty
For warranty information on this product, please call our Internet Customer Service
Center at 1-800-435-4654.
5IIIOB 4:!3 PM
Purchase Information
I ntemevcata log # I 00323245
Store SO SKU# 248550
Most orders ship out in 2-3 business days. Allow an additional 3-7 days for Standard Ground Delivery.
Learn More
Coordinating ltems
or are in the same collection.
http: / /www.homedepot.com /webapp /wcs /stores /servlet/ ProductDis pl.. . - 1&catalog ld = 100 5 3&prod uctld = 100 3 2 3 24 5& N:10000003 + 9O4O1+ 5027 22 Page 2 of 3
* ** * **+*** * * *** * * * + * + * * * * ** +** * ** ***++*+** +********+* * **f+++ + * '* + + * * * + * + *******+* **,ii*+++t*+*
TOWNOFVAIL. COLORADO Statement
***tt**+++*+ + *** ** * ** * * * * * * * *** * * ****+************************* * * * * * * * * * ************ f***+****
StaEement Number: R08 000 0552
Palments MeEhod: Check
MUELIJER CO INC
Arnount: $300 .00 04/29/2OO8O8:19 AIrl
IniE: RLF
Notation: 5345 THE !4if
Permit No:
Parcel No:
Sitse Address:
Locafion:
This Payment:
DR8080123 114)e: DRB - Addition of GRFA
2to3 - 143 - 07 00 -7
2 955 BEI,I,FI.,OT{ER DR VAf I,
LOT 6, BLOCK 5' vAIIr INTERMOUNTAIN
Total Fees:
$300.00 Totsal ALL Pmts :
Bala.Ilce:
$300 - o0
$300.00
s0.00
* *************** ** * * * * * * * *** * * ** ** ***************+******+*:t**+ * + * * * * * * * * ****** ** * * + *********
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Accounts Code Descr j-pt ion gurrent PmtE
DR 00100003 rt2200 DESIGN REVIEW FEES 300.00
$ t-'t
Planning and Enuironmentel Commisson
ACTIOH FOR}jI
Oepartmant of com$unity Osrolopment
75 Soqth F ont gE Road, Vall, Colorado 81S57
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
xeb: rxw. vallgov.<om
Proiect l{ame: Peters Variances
Proiect Description:
Variances for: Front, east and west setbacks, Parking in ROW, Redrction in Required Parking
from 5 to 4.
Participants:
OWNER PETERS, FMNCINE & ALAN O3I25I2OO8
20 FOREST HIIL RD
TORONTO, ONTARIO M5P2P7
APPUCANT CARL MUELLER 0312512008 Phone:970-476-2627
Project Address: 2955 BELIFLOWER DR VAIL Location: LOT 6, BLOCK 6, VAIL INTERMOUNTAIN
Legal Description: Lot: 6 Block: 6 Subdivision: VAIL INTERMOUNTAIN
Parcef Numberz 2L03-L43-O700-7
Comments:
PEC Number: PEC080018
MoUon By:
Second By:
Vote:
CondiUons:
Viele
Kuz
6-0-0
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Actaon: APPROVED
Date of Approval: 0412812008
Cond: I
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 300
(PLAN): PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of
approval.
Cond: CON0009966
1. The variance approlrals are contingent on the Applicant obtaining Town of Vail
approval of a design review application for the proposed additions.
2. The Applicant shall submit a revocable right-of-way permit to Public Works for
all improvements located within the Bellflower Drive right-of-way prior to issuance
of the building permit.
3. The Applicant shall deed restrict the secondary dwelling unit as a Type I
Employee Housing Unit and file all necessary documentation with the Town of Vail
Housing Coordinator prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Ocorpancy,
4. The Applicant shall trim the large existing evergreen tree in the front yard so
that no limbs hang below 7 feet as measured from the ground, upward, prior to the
issuance of the Certificate of Ocorpancy.
ir
Planner: Nicole Peterson PEC Fee Paid: $500.00
t.
Variance Application for Review by the
Planning and Environmental Commission
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81557
teli 970.479.2L28 fax:. 970.479.2452
web: www.vailgov'com
General Information:
All projects requiring planning and Environmental Commission review must receive approval prior to submitting a
building permit application. ilease refer to the submittal requirements for.the parthular approval that is requested.
An application foi planning and Environmental Commission review cannot be accepted until all required information
is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town
Council and/or the Design Review Board.
Type of ApplicaUon and Fee:
$6s0
$400
$6s0
$800
$1s00
$2s0
$1300
$s00
$200
D Rezoning $1300 tr Major Subdivision $1500 tr Minor Subdivision $650 tr ExemDtion Plat $650 E Minor Amendment to an SDD $1000 D New Special Development District $6000 O Major Amendment to an SDD $6000 tr Major Amendment to an SDD $1250
(no extenbr modifiabbns)
Description ofthe Request I
OF hJ
Conditional Use Permit
Floodplain Modification
Minor Exterior Alteration
Major bderior Alteration
Development Plan
Amendment to a Development Plan
Zoning Code Amendment
Variance
Sign Variance
itrP 5l (t br
tr
tr
tr
n
o
tr
tr X
D
LocationoftheProposat: Lot: O Block:
Physical Address:
parcet No.: Lll tl+?o? 0O+ (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
Zoning:
Name(s) of owner(s)r hvrN NV YhXPqNb (6LPS
Mailing Address:
t45? L?1
U|4o . o
6o
b
A
\
a
\
(
.-l
\o
(,
fjj
0-Name of Applicant: ,,-/-a
,'UA &tc q'nata ,f\,/eI cc\f Cottt
?0
Cl: q7o - 7 7b. Ooq /
(L
subdivision: VrrlL lf.'1zAltard?tlN
ft^Jo ?^il1 fflfiatrl
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Mailing Address:
Flcdev\FORMS\Permits\Planning\PECwariance.doc Page 1 of 6
.tr ip:
d - :i-.:._:
!1.*+-.-,
.Jt?
*4';,- 'fle*;?
, ,^Y Yuf walkway and stair to the lower unit was very un-safe. lt was mostly in the dripJine of the
Ai /V- , . 9(' t roof, icy and partially covered with snow. Please consider extending the eave of the
.u ( F- proposed addition or covering the proposed walkway and providing a safe, consistent
,k r route to the EHU door below. n /{ Provide site coverage calculation" - Cl/e, /'
I Oh the Parking Management Plan, please revis6 or add the following:
.rt Location of limits of disturbance fencing.
',s' Sno* storage must be shown within property boundaries adjacent to driveway (30% of / driveway area if unheated, 10% of driveway area if heated). Please indicate if driveway
is heated or non-heated and illustrate and label the snow storage area calculations.
Note: snow storage cannot be shown over trees or shrubs.
/-3: On the Landscape Plan, please revise or add the following:
2' Provide landscape calculations and cross hatch or identify the areas counted toward
_ landscaping.
z6 On the floor plans:
...." Red-line or cross-hatch the area counted towards GRFA and provide GRFA calculations
for each floor.
2' Please label each floor plan with the proposed use. Specifically there is an area on the - upper level that is drawn over the living room and dining of the main floor, that is
unlabeled. lf this area is open to below, please label it as 'open to below' and provide a
section of that area (Vaulted ceilings of more than 16' are counted twice for GRFA).
, Please indicate the height of that area.
-t1 on the elevations:
/- lllustrate proposed building height elevation on roof lines and ridges (actual numbers, not
just match existing).
-B Please note that the applicant will be required to deed reskict the existing secondary unit as a
Type I EHU, as regulated by Section 12-'13, Vail Town Code. Therefore, as part of this
application, you may calculate the GRFA, landscaping and site coverage credits afforded with a
Type I deed restriction. Please reference table 12-13-4, Vail Town Code for specifics.
,X. Additional comments may follow a more detailed Staff review.
y'O. Public Works and Fire comments will be forwarded as soon as received.
This proposal is tentatively scheduled for review by the Planning and Environmental Commission at its
April 28,2008 public hearing. To remain on this schedule, please submit revisions addressing the above
listed items by no later than Noon on Thursdav. Aoril 17, 2008.
lf you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me directly at (970) 477 -3452 or
npeterson@vailqov.com. l'd also be happy to meet with you to discuss the application and comments.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
. 1|al tuk *,,,
Nicole Peterson, Planner ll
Department of Community Deve I o pme nt
75 South l"rontage Road
Vail, CO 8l 657
PH: 970-479-2r38
FAX: 970-479-2452
www.vailgov.com
April 9, 2008
Alan and Francine Peters
c/o Mark Mueller
301 1 Basingdale Boulevard
Vail. CO 81657
Via email: muellercarl@comcast.net
RE: Peters Variances,4230 Spruce Way (DRB 08-0048)
Dear Mr. Mueller,
Thank you for the recent submittal of a Variance application for Review by the Planning and
Environmental Commission. The Town of Vail Staff has reviewed the submitted Variance application
(PEC08-0018) for the proposed addition, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive, Lot 6, Block 6 Vail
Intermountain. The following is a summary of the comments from that review:
.{ Please provide a Title report, including schedules A & B (Did not find in file)/,{ Please provide a written statement listing each variance requested (i.e. setbacks, site coverage / and parking) and addressing the following in regards to each requested variance:
. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
structures in the vicinity.
r The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a
specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment
among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special
privilege.
. The effect of the variance on light, air, distribution of population, transportation, traffic
facilities, utilities and public safety.r How the request complies with adopted Town of Vail planning policies and development
objectives.3. On the site plan, please revise or add:
7t' Building footprint size.
)r' AX Property lines - please show entire property.
;y' Existing and proposed easements.
"-r'Topographic conditions at two foot contour intervals - over entire site."-r/ Topographic conditions at two foot contour intervals - over entire site.',r All proposed roof ridge lines with proposed ridge elevations. Indicate existing (natural
grade prior to construction of structure) and proposed grades shown underneath all roof
lines. This will be used to calculate building height.
Existing and proposed retaining walls with proposed elevations at top and bottom of
walls. A detailed cross-section and elevation drawings shall be provided on the plan or
separate sheet. Stamped engineering drawings are required for walls between 4' and 6'
feet in height and all combination walls.
Please be more descriptive of the proposed staircase and walkway to the EHU (label
materials). There is a missing link from the bottom of the stair to the door below the
existing deck/ proposed addition. On my site visit (4/4i08) | noticed that the current
I
,
*m
Development Review Team & Construction Update
Community Development Large Conference Room
Wednesday at 9:00am
April 2,2008
AGENDA
9:00 Development Review Team
Purpose: Provide coordination and input across Departments on proposed development proposals
Staff ltem / Tooic Descriotion Time
CD 1. Building Department Updates 15 minutes
WC 2. Planning Department Updates 10 minutes
WC 3. Code Enforcement Update 5 minutes
CD 4. Land Mark-reviewcomments-dueApril 11h 10 minutes
CD 5. LionSquare Lodge North Update - PW issues 10 minutes
CD 6. Timberline Lodge Update - Water line issues and other comments
BG
WC
NP
Past due
7. WMC Deck Enclosure - Introduction to PW and Fire
8. Front Door Plat - Introduction to PW
L Peters Residence 2955 Bellflower Drive - Intro to PW and Fire
10:30 Construction Update
Purpose: Provide staff coordination on public and private construction projects
1. Update from Lionshead - LS 10 minutes
10 minutes
10 minutes
10 minutes
10 minutes
5 minutes
5 minutes
2. Update from Village
3. Other ROWUtility lssues
10 minutes
10 minutes
Other -
DRB/PEC Updates
1rr9rl+<- vwl
lruz ii,,. @.
?-co *
v*fidter{ ?"1 nn-fr,,.f*^r
Development Review Team & Construction Update
Community Development Large Conference Room
Wednesday at 9:00am
April23,2008
AGENDA
input across Departments on proposed development proposals
Description Time
CG
BG
BG
NP
NP
BG
RF
4. Peters Residence Variance - PW Comments
5. VMS Weather Station - PW Comments
6. Gurrentz Addition
7. Development Review Coordination & Permits Plus
15 minutes
10 minutes
5 minutes
5 minutes
5 minutes
5 minutes
10 minutes
1 0:30 Construction Update
Purpose: Provide staff coordination on public and private construction projects
1. Update from Lionshead - LS 10 minutes
2. Update from Village
3. Other ROW/Utility lssues
10 minutes
10 minutes
Other -
DRB/PEC Updates
5 minutes
5 minutes
:
9:00 Development Review Team
Purpose: Provide coordination and
Staff ltem / Topic
Page I of I
Nicole Peterson - PEC08-O018 (Peters Variance)
From: David Rhoades
To: Nicole Peterson
Date: 0412112008 1:44 PM
Subject: PEC08-0018 (Peters Variance)
Here are my notes from our approval in Permits Plus.
Based on current landscaping and the new addition, a monitored fire alarm system and a fire sprinkler system
will be required.
It is approximately 246 feet around the perimeter with very limited access.
David Rhoades
Fire Inspector
Vail Fire and Emergency Services
970-477-3454
drhoades@vailgov.com
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the
Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town
Code, on April 28, 2008, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in
consideration of:
A request for a final review of variances from Sections 12-6D-6, Setbacks, 12-6D-9, Site
Coverage, and Section 12-6D-11, Parking, and Section 14-3-2F, Other Requirements,
Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a
residential addition and remodel with required parking located partial within the public
right-of-way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080018)
Applicant: Alan Peters, represented by Karl Mueller
Planner: Nicole Peterson
A request for final review of a final plat for a minor subdivision, pursuant to Chapter 13-4,
Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a re-subdivision of the Front Door Site,
located at 151,250, and 280 Vail Lane/(a complete legal description is available for
inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department upon request), and
setting for details in regard thereto. (PEC080019)
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company
Planner:Warren Campbell
A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed update and
review of the Vail Village Master Plan, pursuant to Section Vlll-C, Adoption, Extensions,
and Amendments, Vail Village Master Plan, to affirm the applicability and purpose of the
Master Plan, Iocated within the boundaries of the adopted Master Plan/(a complete legal
description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development
Department upon request), and setting for details in regard thereto. (PEC080020)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner:George Ruther
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection
during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South
Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that
precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.
Please call 970-479-21 38 for additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon
call970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing
Published April 1 1, 2008, in the Vail Daily.
16
request, with 24-hour notification. Please
lmpaired, for information.
cnnsistent with the planning polices and development objeerives in the
Town of Vail without gra*t of special privilege. The adjacelrt propenies
are faced rrith sinrilar lirnitalions and the parking as sho*vu on our site
plan is a solution found throughott this neighborhood"
3" See tirE nslv entire Site Plan for all roqucsted rwisions end additions.
4. See the Parking Mamgernent Plan for all reque$ed rwirions and addilion*"
5. See the Landsoape Plan for all requasied revisions and additi.on*"
6. $ee the Red-line floor plars for all rcquested informaticm and updated upper
floor plan for labelcd open to below arta.
?. Sea the etrevations for actual building height (numcricnl form,at).
8. The existing secondary unit will become e deod rc$iicled Tlpc I EHU us
rsque$rcd by tha Tou,n of Vail followiug spproval of this praposal. The site
coverage EI{U credi{ sllows ow desigrr to conform to r€gu}ation$,
9" We wi| address additioual comments ftom Slaffrevier+ as required.
10. lVe will sddress Bnr cu:nmsnts from lhe ll.rblic Works and fire Deuartment as
nBcegsary,
Pless€ contaci ru with any qrestioDs sr cofirmerlts at the ntnnber below"
Sinceretry yours,
lHE M J MIJHI.,LHR CO.. INC,
h{nrk and Car{ Mueller
P.O" Bpx 2?47
Vait CO 81657
974 476-2627
15
April 17, 2008
Nicolc Petcrson. Planner II
Torvn of Vail
Departmcnt oi communiry f)cvclopnrcnt
75 Sonth Frontage Road
Vail. CO 8165?
RH: Peters Variances, 2955 Bellflo',r-er Drive (PEC08-0018)
De€r N'ls. Peterson.
This is a respons€ to your letter dated April 9, 2008.
L See the attached Title repod, including schedules A &B for the above
mentioncd property-
2, We are requesling vslislless from Setbacks (front and sides), Parting in the
right-of-way and a rsluction in required parking.
a. Front Setback: Wc are requesting s vrriance to allow for a frout
sclback of 9 fe*L The proposa! includes no GRFA in the fronl
setback and apprcximately 105 squar* tbet of the garagc rvithin the
hont *ctbnck.
b. Side Setback (nest): We nrc rcqucsting I sidc sctbeck variance lo
allow for a lvelt sid€ setbeck of 5.5 feet The proposal includes
approximately 62 square feet of new GRFA and approximately 168
square feet ofthe proposed garage in the west seibilck,
c. Side Setback (east): \Ye are reque*ling I side rietb*ck vrriance to
allow for au east side setback of 11.8 fcci. The proposed addition oo
the east side of the structure includes ap;nox imatcly 20 sguarc fcet of
GRFA in the east side setback. Tlris setback is cu'rently non-
confoming, rryith a sctback of I I.8 leet
d. Parking in the right-of-way: Wc nrc rcqucsting a varianc.e from the
requirement that all required parking mast be located on site. The
residcnce requires a totsl of 5 parking spaces (3 for primary ard 2 for
EHU). We are requesling a yarirncc from the rrquired 5 parking
rplce* to 4 parking spaces (1 in the garage and 3 into th€ right-of
way). One oftlre parking spaces encroaches up to i3 ft" into the right-
of-way.
We bclieve that thc Fhysical bardships of this properq,tmrrdnt
variance approual. Lot 6 is 8.625 sq. ft. in area, approxirrrarely 64' in
u.idth adiacent to the stre€l and the front property line is not paraltel with
the street. TIre exisling structure is closer to the sloping easl propefiy line
vvith the entry and par*ing located on the west side ofthe properly. The
addition ofr garage over part of the exi*ting p*rking as *hown cm plan is
14
Attachment B: Letter from Applicant
13
Attachment A: Vicinity Map
depive the Applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other propefties in
the Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential District."
IX. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Letter from Applicant
C. Plans
D. Public Notice
11
Parking Spaces
"The Planning and Environmental Commission approves a variance from Sectrr:n
12-6D-1 1, Parking, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to
vary the number of parking spaces from the required five (5) spaces to four (4)
spaces located at 2955 Beilflower Drive/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail lntermountain."
Parking in the right-of-way
"The Planning and Environmental Commission approves a vaiance from Sectlon
1 4-3-2F, Other Requirements, pursuant to Chapter 1 2-17, Variances, Vail Town
Code, to vary the requirement that all required parking be located on site to allow
for the partial encroachment of three (3) parking spaces into the right-of-way
Iocated at 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail lntermountain."
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the variance
requests, Staff recommends the following conditions:
"1. The variance approvals are contingent on the Applicant obtaining Town of Vail
approval of a design review application for the proposed additions.
2. The Applicant shall submit a revocable ight-of-way permit to Public Works for all
improvements located within the Bellflower Drive right-of-way priorto issuance of
the building permit.
3. The Applicant shall deed restrict the secondary dwelling unit as a Type I Employee
Housing Unit and file all necessary documentation with the Town of Vail Housing
Coordinator prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
4. The Applicant shall trim the large existing evergreen tree in the front yard so that
no limbs hang below 7 feet as measured from the ground, upward, prior to the
issuance of the Certificate of Accupancy."
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the variance
requests, Staff recommends the Commission, make the following findings:
"1. That the granting of the variances do not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the Two-Family
Pimary/Secondary Residential District.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properlies or improvements in the
vicinity.
That the strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the setback and parking
regulations results in a practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship
inconsistent with the development objectives of the Town Code or the Two-
F am ily P i m ary/Seco nd a ry Re side nti al D i st rict.
That the strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would
2.
?
4.
10
not believe that approval of the variance will have a negative effect on the factors
listed above.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the
proposed variance.
Another factor in consideration of the requested variances is that the Planning and
Environmental Commission has approved similar variances on the subject property
on two previous occasions (March 26,2001 and November 24,2003).
VIII. STAFFRECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends approval, with conditions, of the
requested variances from Sections 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6D-1 'l , Parking, and
Section 14-3-2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17,
Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition and remodel with required
parking located partially within the public right-of-way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6,
Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Staffs recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section Vll of this
memorandum. Staff has provided the five variance requests in separate motions, below,
for the Commissions consideration.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the variance
requests, the Community Development Department recommends, the Commission pass the
following separate motions:
Front Setback
"The Planning and Environmental Commission approves avaiancefrom Section
1 2-6D-6, Setbacks, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Vaiances, Vail Town Code, to
vary the front setbackfrom the required 20 feetto a range of 9.5feetto l4feetto
allow for a one-car garage addition and from the required 16 feet to 1 4 feet for a
covered porch addition located at 2955 Bellflower Dive/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail
lntermountain."
West Side Setback
"The Planning and EnvironmentalCommission approves a variance from Secfion
1 2-6D-6, Sefbacks, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to
vary the wesf srde setback from the required 1 5 feet to a range of 5.5 feet to 8.5
feet to allow for a one-car garage addition and master bedroom over a poftion of
the garage located at 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail lntermountain."
East Side Setback
"The Planning and Environmental Commission approves a variance fram Secttbn
1 2-6D-6, Sefbacks, pursuant to Chapter 1 2-1 7, Variances, Vail Town Code, to
vary the easf srde sefback from the required 15 feet to 12 feet to allow for a
dining room addition located at 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail
lntermountain."
Front, West Side and East Side setbacks:
Staff does not believe approval of the requested setback variances would be a grant
of special privilege. The lot size, lot configuration, existing structure, and 50 ft. Gore
Creek stream setback are all physical hardships on this lot which greatly restrict the
ability of improvements to be made to the structure without a variance. The lot is
nonconforming with regards to lot size and the house currently encroaches into the
front and side setbacks. Many of the structures in the neighborhood have similar
encroachments into the setbacks (see below).
The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public
safety.
The Public Works Department recommended that the existing evergreen tree in the
front yard be trimmed so as not to obstruct the view along Bellflower Drive. Staff is
proposing a condition to that effect in Section Vlll of this memorandum. Staff does
Location Description of the site
2923 Bellflower Nonconforming 4-plex approved by Eagle County. Encroaches 9 ft.
into the stream setback, 7.5 ft. into the east setback, and
encroaches into the riohtof-wav.
2933 Bellflower No information available.
2943 Bellflower Granted a front setback variance to allow for a front setback of 13
ft. Side setbacks are nonconformino at 12 ft. and 5 ft.
2953 Bellflower Granted a parking variance to not enclose parking in conjunction
with EHU. Meets all setback requirements.
2963 Bellflower Granted setback variances allowing for a 6 ft. front setback, 6.4 ft.
east side setback. and 8.4 ft. side setback.
2983 Bellflower No information available.
3003 Bellflower Granted front setback variance to allow for a 13 ft. front setback,
with GRFA being allowed beneath the garage. Side setback
variance was denied.
2992 Bellflower Denied (by Council) a side setback variance for garage and GRFA.
Meets all setback reouirements.
2982 Bellflower Meets all setback reouirements.
2972 Bellflower Meets all setback reouirements.
2962 Bellflower No information available.
2852 Bellflower Nonconforming. Encroaches into the front setback 9 ft. and 1 ft.
into side setback.
2942 Bellflower Granted a front setback variance for a garage and storage area to
allow for a 15.5 ft. front setback. Nonconforming with a 7 ft.
encroachment into the east side setback.
2932 Bellflower Meets all setback reouirements.
2995 Basinqdale No information available.
2975 Basinqdale Meets all setback reouirements.
2955 Basinqdale Garaqe located in front setback.
2945 Basinqdale Nonconforminq. Encroaches into side setback 7 ft.
2935 Basinqdale Granted front setback variance to allow for GRFA below garage in
front setback. Below qrade encroachment of 18.5 ft.
2925 Basinodale Granted front setback variance to allow for a front setback of 13 ft.
2.
the proposed garage addition is located (See Attachment A - Vicinity Map).
Currently the west neighbor parks vehicles within one foot of the shared property
line. The west neighboring property has also been granted a variance for its east
setback to 6.4 feet, Staff does not believe the neighbor to the west will be negatively
impacted by the proposed addition into the west side setback.
East Side Setback: The Applicant is requesting to vary the east side setback from
the required 15 feet to 12 feet to allow for a dining room addition. Approximately 20
square feet of the dining room is proposed within the east side setback. The dining
room addition will extend south and follow the existing eastern most wall of the
existing house, which is currently encroaching into the east side setback.
The proposed east side addition (dining room) is flush with the east side of the
existing two-family dwelling. Therefore, the addition does not encroach into the east
side setback more than the existing home. Staff does not believe the neighbor to the
east will be negatively impacted by the proposed addition into the east side setback.
Parking Spaces: The Applicant is requesting to vary the number of parking spaces
from the required 5 spaces (3 for primary and 2for secondary) to 4 spaces.
Currently, the property has only two parking spaces. The proposal would increase
the amount of parking on-site to 4 spaces, bringing the property into greater
compliance. The proposed surface parking spaces will not encroach closer to the
west property line. The proposed eastern most (grass-create covered) parking
space is proposed over 30 feet from the east property line. Staff does not believe
the neighboring properties will be negatively impacted by the proposed parking.
Parking in the right-of-way: The Applicant is requesting a variance from the
requirement that all required parking must be located on site. Three of the proposed
surface parking spaces encroach up to 13 feet into the Bellflower Drive right-of-way.
The lot size, lot configuration and existing structure location make providing the
required number of parking spaces (5) on-site impossible, without a variance to allow
parking within the right-of-way. Town of Vail Public Works Department has reviewed
the proposal and supports the request for 2 of the 3 surface parking spaces within
the right-of-way. Public Works supports the 2 parking spaces that are in the same
footprint as the existing driveway.
Public Works requires that a revocable right-of-way permit be issued. Staff is
proposing a condition to that effect in Section Vlll of this memorandum. Currently,
the neighbor to the west, most affected by the proposed parking, provides parking
within one foot of the shared property line. Staff does not believe the neighboring
properties will be negatively impacted by the proposed parking in the right-of-way.
The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility
and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the
objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege.
Max. Building Height:
Max. GRFA:
Primary
EHU
Total
Max. Site Coverage:
Min. Landscape Area:
Min. Parking:
JJ
2,380.2 sq. ft.
1,586.8 sq. ft.
3,967 sq. ft.
25',
1,631 sq. ft.
827 sq. ft.
2,458 sq. ft.
2,1 56 sq. ft. (25%) 1 ,1 1 I sq. ft.
4,743 sq. ft. (55%) 6,510 sq. ft.
2 spaces
No change
2,209 sq. ft.
No change
3,036 sq. ft.
(13%) 1,835 sq. ft- (21.2o/o)
(7sVo) 6,395 sq. ft. (74.2%)
4 spaces
('1 enclosed)
5 spaces
vt.SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
North:
South:
East:
West:
Land Use
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Zoninq
Residential Cluster District
Two-Family Primary/Secondary District
Two-Family Primary/Secondary District
Two-Family Primary/Secondary District
v1t.CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses
and structures in the vicinity.
Front Setback: The Applicant is requesting to vary the front setback from the
required 20 feet to a range of 9.5 feet to 14 feet to allow for a one-car garage
addition and from the required 16 feet to 14 feet for a covered porch addition
(Covered porches are allowed to encroach into the setback 4 feet). Approximately
273 square feet, of the 462 square foot garage is proposed within the front and west
side setbacks. Approximately 6 square feet of the covered porch is proposed within
the front setback.
The proposed garage addition is flush with the front of the existing two-family
dwelling. Therefore the neighboring property's front yard sight lines are un-affected
by the proposed garage addition into the front setback.
West Side Setback: The Applicant is requesting to vary the west side setback from
the required 15 feet to a range of 5.5 feet to 8.5 feet to allow for a one-car garage
addition and master bedroom over a portion of the garage. Approximately 273
square feet, of the 462 square foot garage is proposed within the front and west side
setbacks. Approximately 62 square feet of the proposed master bedroom above the
garage, is proposed within the west side setback.
The existing residence to the west (2963 Bellflower Drive) is situated at an angle that
places the home closer to its western property line than to its east, at the point where
B. Necessary Findings: The planning and environmental commission shall make the
following findings before granting a vaiance:
1. That the granting of the vaiance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properffes c/asslfled in the same distict.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or mateially injurious to propefties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the vaiance is wananted for one or more of the following reasons.'
a. The stict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to
other propefties in the same zone.
c. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would depive the Applicant of pivileges enjoyed by the
owners of other propefties in the same distict.
12-17-7: PERMIT APPROVAL AND EFFECT:
Approval of the vaiance shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and
construction not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion within two (2) years
from when the approval becomes final.
1 4-3-2 OTH ER REQU/REMENTS
F. Location: Parking spaces, aisles and turning areas shall be entirely within lot lines and
shall not encroach on any public right of way. No parked vehicle shall overhang any public
right of way.
V. SITE ANALYSIS
Zoning:
Land Use Plan Designation:
Curent Land Use:
Development Standard
Min. Lot Area:
Min. Setbacks:
Front:
Sides:
Two-Family Primary/Secondary District
Low Density Residential
Two-Family Dwelling
Required
15,000 sq. ft.
20'
15'(east)
15'(west)
50'Gore Creek
Existino
8,624 sq. ft.
14.4',
1z',
20.5'
62.s',
Proposed
No change
9.5- 14'
1z',
5.5-8.5'
52'Rear:
B.
(20'), the minimum side setback shall be fifteen feet (1 5'), and the minimum rear setback
shall be fifteen feet (15').
12-6D-11: PARKING:
Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this Title.
Section '12-17 Yariances (in part)
12-17-1: PURPOSE:
A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: ln order to prevent or lo /essen such practical
difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this
title as would result from strict or Iiteral interpretation and enforcement, variances from
ceftain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of
existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in
the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions
in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the Applicant of strict or literal
compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance.
Development Standards Excepted: Vaiances may be granted only with respect to the
development slandards prescribed for each district, including lot area and site
dimensions, sefbacks, dlsfances between buildings, height, density control, building
bulk control, site coverage, usable open space, landscaping and site development,
and parking and loading requirements; or with respect to the provisions of chapter 1 1
of this title, governing physical development on a site.
Use Regulations Not Affected: The power to grant variances does not extend to the
use regulations prescribed for each district because the flexibility necessary to avoid
resu/fs inconsistent with the objectives of this title is provided by chapter 16,
"Conditional Use Permits", and by section 12-3-7, "Amendment" of this title.
12-17-6: CRITERIA AND F/ND/NGS:
A. Factors Enumerated: Before acting on a variance application, the planning and
environmental commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the
requested variance:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
structures in the vicinity.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement
of a specified regulation is necessa4y to achieve compatibility and uniformity of
treatment among sltes in the vicinity, orto attain the objectives of this title without
grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the
proposed variance.
site, specifically the Planning and Environmental Commission found, "the garage would tend
to overcrowd the lot and would impairthe common open space between the residence and
the residence to the west."
On March 26, 2001. the Planning and Environmental Commission approved similarsetback
and parking variances for this property.
On February 7, 2002, the Design Review Board approved the design review application
associated with the approved variances from March 26, 2001.
On November 24, 20Q3, the Planning and Environmental Commission again approved
similar setback and parking variances for this property. This proposal varies in that the
Applicant has removed the previously requested den and laundry room and reconfigured the
proposed garage, master bedroom, living room, and dining room additions. This approval
has since expired.
IV. APPLICABLEPLANNINGDSCUI|,IENTS
Vail Town Code
Section 12-2 Definitions
SETBACK: The distance from a lot or site line, creek or stream measured hoizontally to a
line or location within the lot or site which establishes the permifted location of uses,
structures, or buildings on the site.
SETBACK LINE: A line or location within a lot or site which establishes the permitted
location of uses, structures, or buildings on the site.
SETBACK LINE, FRONT: The setback line extending the full width of the site parallel to and
measured from the front lot or site line.
SETBACK LINE, SIDE: The setback line extending from the front setback line to the rear
setback line parallel to and measured from the side lot or site line.
Section 12-5D Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS) District (in part)
12-6D-1: PURPOSEi
The two-family primary/secondary residentia/ dlsfnbt is intended to provide sites for single-
family residenfial uses or two-family residential uses in which one unit is a larger primary
residence and the second unit is a smaller caretaker apaftment, together with such public
facilities as may appropiately be located in the same distict. The two-family
pimary/secondary residential district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, pivacy and
open space for each dwelling, commensurate with single-family and two-family occupancy,
and to maintain the desirable residential qualities of such sifes by establishing appropiate
site deve lop m ent stand ard s.
12-6D-6: SEIBACKS:
ln the primary/secondary residential district, the minimum front setback shall be twenty feet
1il.
On November 24,2003, the Applicant received variance approvals to setbacks and parking
requirements, similar to this current proposal. The previous approval has since expired.
Therefore, the Applicant is returning to the Planning and Environmental Commission to
request the approval of a slightly modified proposal. The Applicant has removed the
previously requested den and laundry room and reconfigured the proposed garage, master
bedroom, living room, and dining room additions.
Attached is a letter from the Applicant describing the request in greater detail (Attachment
B). The descriptions of the variances requested are as follows:
1. Front Setback: The Applicant is requesting to vary the front setback from the
required 20 feet to a range of 9.5 feet to 14 feet to allow for a one-car garage
addition and from the required 16 feet to 14 feet for a covered porch addition
(Covered porches are allowed to encroach into the setback 4 feet). Approximately
273 square feet, of the 462 sguare foot garage is proposed within the front and west
side setbacks. Approximately 6 square feet of the covered porch is proposed within
the front setback.
2. West Side Setback: The Applicant is requesting to vary the west side setback from
the required 15 feet to a range of 5.5 feet to 8.5 feet to allow for a one-car garage
addition and master bedroom over a portion of the garage. Approximately 273
square feet, of the 462 square foot garage is proposed within the front and west side
setbacks. Approximately 62 square feet of the proposed master bedroom abovethe
garage, is proposed within the west side setback.
3. East Side Setback: The Applicant is requesting to vary the east side setback from
the required 15 feet to 12 feet to allow for a dining room addition. Approximately 20
square feet of the dining room is proposed within the east side setback. The dining
room addition will extend south and follow the existing eastern most wall of the
existing house, which is currently encroaching into the east side setback.
4. Parking Spaces: The Applicant is requesting to vary the number of parking spaces
from the required 5 spaces (3 for primary and 2 for secondary) to 4 spaces.
5. Parking in the right-of-way: The Applicant is requesting a variance from the
requirement that all required parking be located on site. Three of the proposed
surface parking spaces encroach up to 't 3 ft. into the Bellflower Drive right-of-way.
BACKGROUND
The original plat for this property was recorded in 1970 under Eagle County jurisdiction. The
existing structure was constructed in 1977 under Eagle County regulations requiring side
setbacks of five feet. when the property was annexed into the Town of Vail under
Ordinance 15 in 1987 it was zoned Two-Family Primary/ Secondary Residential (PS) District
with a minimum front setback of 20 feet and side yard of 15 feet.
On November 2, 1983, the Applicant received approval to construct a secondary deed
restricted unit on the lot. At that time, the Town Zoning regulations required that one half
(112) of the required parking be enclosed. The Applicant received a variance from this
requirement. The variance was granted based on the difficulty of building a garage on the
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
April28,2008
A request for a final review of variances from Sections 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Section
12-6D-11 , Parking, and Section 14-3-2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12-17,Yariances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential
addition and remodel with required parking located partially within the public right-of-
way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080018)
Applicant: Alan Peters, represented by Carl Mueller
Planner: Nicole Peterson
il.
SUMMARY
The Applicant, Alan Peters, represented by Carl Mueller, is requesting variances from
Sections 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6D-1 1, Parking, and Section 14-3-2F, Other
Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17,Variances, Vail Town Code, to
allow for a residential addition and remodel with required parking located partially within the
public right-of-way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Based upon Staffs review of the criteria in Section Vll of this memorandum and the
evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends
approval, with conditions stated in section Vlll, subject to the findings noted in Section Vll
of this memorandum.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The Applicant is requesting variances from Section 12-6A-6 Setbacks, for the front, east
side and west side setbacks to allow for a new one-car garage with master bedroom above,
a covered porch and additions to the existing living room and dining room. The request for a
variance to Section 12-6D-11 , Parking, is to reduce the amount of parking spaces provided
from the required 5 spaces to 4 spaces. The final variance from Section 14-3-2F, Other
Requirements, is to allow for 3 vehicle parking spaces to be partially located within the Town
owned, Bellflower Drive, right-of-way.
The public notice for the request included a variance from 12-6D-9, Site Coverage.
However, the proposal complies with the Site Coverage requirement and a variance is not
required. A vicinity map and plans are attached for reference (Attachments A & C).
5 minutes
8. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed amendment to the
Vail Village Master Plan, pursuant to Section Vlll-C, Adoption, Extensions, and Amendments,
Vail Village Master Plan, to amend Sub-Area 4, Transportation Center, to facilitate the
redevelopment of the site with employee housing, commercial, and office uses, located at 241
South Frontage Road EasVTracts B and C, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (PEC080015)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: George Ruther
AGTION: Withdrawn
9. Approval of April 14,2A08 minutes MOTION: SECOND:
'10. Information Update
11. Adjournment
MOTION:SECOND:
VOTE:
VOTE:
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published April 25, 2008, in the Vail Daily.
Page 3
60 minutes
4. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed update and review
of the Vail Village Master Plan, pursuant to Section Vlll-C, Adoption, Extensions, and
Amendments, Vail Village Master Plan, to affirm the applicability and purpose of the Master Plan,
located within the boundaries of the adopted Master Plan/(a complete legal description is
available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department upon request),
and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080020)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: George Ruther
AGTION:
MOTION:SECOND:VOTE:
5 minutes
5. A request for final review of a major e)iterior alteration pursuant to Section 12-7H-7, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, and conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-7H-3, Permitted
and Conditional Uses; First Floor or Street Level, to allow for the redevelopment of the North Day
Lot with a structure containing Type lll employee housing units, located at 600 West Lionshead
Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC080009)
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by the Mauriello Planning Group,
LLC
Planner: WanenCampbell/GeorgeRuther
ACTION: Table to May 12, 2008 MOTION: SECOND:
5 minutes
6. A request for flnal review of a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-7H-5, Conditional
Uses; Generally (On All Levels of A Building or Outside of A Building), Vail Town Code, to
facilitate the construction of a public building, grounds, and facilities (transportation center) on
the North Day Lot, located at 600 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3,
and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080010)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: WarrenCampbell/GeorgeRuther
AGTION: Table to May 12, 2008
MOTION:SECOND:VOTE:
5 minutes
7. A request for final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-78-7, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, a request for a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-78-5,
Permitted and Conditional Uses; Above Second Floor, a request for variances from Section '12-
7B-15, Site Coverage, and Section 12-78-16, Landscaping and Site Development, pursuant to
Chapter 12-17, Yariances, and a request for amendments to an adopted view corridor pursuant
to Section 12-22-5, Amendments, and Section 12-22-6, Encroachments into Existing View
Corridors, Vail Town Code, to allow for the re-development of the Clock Tower Building (Gorsuch
Ltd. Building) to include three floors of above grade structure, a new clock tower, and an eating
and drinking establishment above the second floor, located at 263 East Gore Creek Drive/Lots D
and E, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC070025)
Applicant: Gorsuch Ltd. and John P. McBride, represented by Resort Design Associates
Planners: Scot Hunn
ACTION: Table to May 12, 2008
VOTE:
MOTION:SECOND:
Page 2
VOTE:
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
April28,2008
1:00pm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visits:
1. Osaki Sushi Restaurant - 100 East Meadow Drive
2. Peters Residence - 2955 Bellflower Drive
Driver: Warren
25 minutes
1. A request for a final review of variances from Sections 12-6D-6, Setbacks, 12-6D-9, Site
Coverage, Section 12-6D-11, Parking, and Section 14-3-2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Yariances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition
and remodel with required parking located partially within the public right-of-way, located at 2955
Bellflower Drive/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC080018)
Applicant: Alan Peters, represented by Carl Mueller
Planner: NicolePeterson
ACTION:
MOTION:SECOND:VOTE:
15 minutes
2. A request for final review of a final plat for a minor subdivision, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor
Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a re-subdivision of the Front Door Site, located at 151,
250, and 280 Vail Lane/(a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of
Vail Community Development Department upon request), and setting for details in regard
thereto. (PEC080019)
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company
Planner: WarrenCamobell
ACTION:
MOTION:SECOND:VOTE:
40 minutes
3. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special
Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Article 12-9A, Special Development
District, Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition to the Osaki's Sushi restaurant, located at 100
East Meadow Drive/Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC080016)
Applicant: Takeshi and Kazue Osaki, represented by K.H. Webb Architects
Planner: Bill Gibson
AGTION:MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Page 1
consistent with the planning polices and development objectives in the
Town of Vail without grant of special privilege. The adjacent properties
are faced with similar limitations and the parking as shown on our site
plan is a solution found throughout this neighborhood.
3. See the new entire Site Plan for all requested revisions and additions.
4. See the Parking Management Plan for all requested revisions and additions.
5. See the Landscape Plan for all requested revisions and additions.
6. See the Red-line floor plans for all requested information and updated upper
floor plan for labeled open to below area.
7. See the elevations for actual building height (numerical fbrmat).
8. The existing secondary unit will become a deed restricted Type I EHU as
requested by the Town of Vail following approval of this proposal. The site
coverage EHU credit allows our design to conform to regulations.
9. We will address additional comments from Staff review as required.
10. We will address any comments from the Public Works and Fire Department as
necessary.
Please contact us with any questions or comments at the number below.
Sincerely yours,
THE M J MUELLER CO." INC.
Mark and Carl Mueller
P.O. Box2747
Vail, CO 81657
974 476-2677
April 17,2008
Nicole Peterson, Planner II
Town of Vail
Department of community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Peters Variances,2955 Bellflower Drive (PEC08-0018)
Dear Ms. Peterson,
This is a response to your letter dated April 9' 2008.
L
2.
See the attached Title report, including schedules A & B for the above
mentioned property.
We are requesting variances from Setbacks (front and sides), Parking in the
right-of-way and a reduction in required parking.
a. Front Setback: We are requcsting a variance to allow for a front
setback of 9 feet. The proposal includes no GRFA in the front
setback and approximately 105 square feet ofthe garage within the
front setback.
c.
Side Setback (west): We are requesting a side setback variance to
allow for a west side setback of5.5 feet. The proposal includes
approximately 62 square feet of new GRFA and approximately I 68
square feet ofthe proposed garage in the west setback.
Side Setback (east): We are requesting a side setback variance to
allow for an east side setback of 1 1.8 feet. The proposed addition on
the east side ofthe structure includes approximately 20 square feet of
GRFA in the east side setback. This setback is currently non-
conforming, with a setback of I 1.8 feet.
Parking in the right-of'-way: We are requesting a variance from the
requirement that all required parking must be located on site. The
residence requires a total of 5 parking spaces (3 for primary and 2 for
EHU). We are requesting a variance from the required 5 parking
spaces to 4 parking spaces (l in the garage and 3 into the right-of
way). One of the parking spaces encroaches up to 13 11. into the right-
of-way.
We believe that the physical hardships of this property wanant
variance approval. Lot 6 is 8,625 sq. ft. in area, approximately 64' in
width adjacent to the street and the front property line is not parallel with
the street. The existing structure is closer to the sloping east property line
with the entry and parking located on the west side of the property. The
addition ofa garage over part ofthe existing parking as shown on plan is
b.
d.
06/?9/zAaE 05:50 416?564380 #1?3? P.01? / 01?
CONDITIOIT{S AND STIrII,AnONS Co{turcd
s. PRCOFOFt OS$OK DAMAGE.
Itr tdtliirod tD tDd Elitt ilE di4c8 rcquirEd rsd+t S++lioc 3 of 'l'."c Cooditks* *nd $iFr {ioe hsvc baoo prwiited thc Coopoy, r prcof of,h*r or &t ,*gt cigD€d
Erd swom ts by lhE iacurcd chham *jl bc filmishtd r+ $G Cmpany witb-m Xt eys drf the iEutEd chirtllnt dnll arcEtrin 6c frcra givirg fis fo &€ I,orE or dEEgc..
Tbc p*xf rrf I,w <,r dl4Ic rhtll dcscl*c tbt ddfact i!, or lir:r or cqeufibadco oEr *e ridc. n ortir Er.r ieE d rg.;.t by rbii poli,ly $,!iib +drdgr.n rle brri, of
losrofc'!Dlgt5I'!hN]|c5tc'tAt}tG6X|cpo*ib|e.thtbaairotc,alctltiti4Ihcarnnrn''olihG|orf(r&qge.lfrhctou9eny.apoijrrrlieedbyrhcf*i|ulcofthcind
claiEEr[ ro pfqvidg dtt raquiGd proof af rm or du ge. &c Congoads r'bliAdions tu &c irarrd uDd.r tLs polic]' surlf brEir$r, irct,4firg
to d*&td, prrrsouutc, or coo:imrc arry Eigriio!, pfth rEgEd ro tha $tr+r {E Eanirf rE{uiriqg such prcofof lr*. or &magc-
It rddirisa' ale iterr€d chiffid tdy rcsfoffibtJ be r"quirsd to {c6oit io extui!*io! rrrdsr oltb by any i[&orize.l rcprceREtivs of tr cowpsny aod s]ul
Produce f$r cEEisrtion. irtY*fiod {t!d copyilgr rt $ct rBsonablc riEcf i-od phco* ti Efy bc d€siEDthd by riy rutborized rvprcscnfetivc
b(toLs. l6dgGr6' ,thcck*, +nv{xjodlG6 od tDoEroEnda, rAebrr bceriag e drre hefqr* or qncr Drtc of PoIicy, srlricb reacooably pcnairr to lho lo$ or do.oegc- Fu!rhcr,
if rqo+*cd by ty lrrhsdzed Gpreccotctivc cfthc C4qEay, rfg hsrnd ch;r ff gdl gBrr fr Fcmiasiorr+ ia rvririag, for aay ruthorigt{ nrrlqsa;qtrtiys
to BxirDilA, ir+c+t ud copy rll raoords, b<xrlt$, lcdgcrs" chocks, cfrrqpDdcoc enl O*UOtlgta iu thc eu*ody of codlr$l of a rhird perty, wbic.h rtrrooahfy prtai:n fo
thc l'oss or d{E g€- ,flt inftnnntioi desrFrEd re cofiacmiet 5y 1t6 ilaEd clriorrf tE*idEd to thc Coq&J puirur b thid scclioai *bdll !or, bc di*lo*d to c&qs unl.$*'irlbcTE$otublgjudgDcEtof6ccompN'|y,itisnfc$s|tyilthcadrnini*trlitmoftbccIrim.FnitureofusiqutdcbinutohEhfofe!.Ait'iIr.ti0Alr!dcr'
.proa+cc o{btr resf@r}rly r€qu.,$ed hforoetion or grrnt poroission to $c{rrrE rsr&Drbty uEccr*{fy idforE tioE fErn tfid panier as rcquird in
tcrorfurrir rfiy li.{biliry of rhc Co|4tr|lay thrdet UiE poli€} !E ro rhat ctriE.
6. OI'TIONS TO PAY ON, OTTIERWIS;E $ETTLE CLAIM* .IERMII{ATION Ot} LIA.EUJTY,
lrr r:r.ra (lfe +hi!a uadcr this policy. rh+ CoDrpany rhll bdv. thc followiog rrlditiodr.t optiors:
(.r) To Pt sr Tedtf Fr],rr€ of |he Aq.x|Dt of tt\q|arrd.
,Tqpoydrt6dcrplytmntoftbcrarouorofinlutlaccurrdcrdi*poligytoE5thcrwitlrr4vsosts.EttorDc]6,eEsud6IpcDEGEiEcufqdbylbc.rIF.r'cd'()Ir;t[aiwhich
wdru 'rulhodtrd by lhc Coopray. uP to thi tirtr qf pgyarrnt or laDdcr of pql{ficfi +!rt whfoh thc con4,flny i,r obtiFErcd ra tEy,Upontboexer$it9iby&cCoo1rtoy<rfrhi5oFlio'l..r|I}iabi1iryandobligaq(bgiotbciofr'tduD]d$uisPoticy'o|berlha!tornsLt]tbcpeyen'ellui'$d'rtl
tcnnioak*iEludi48hlyliabiliryoratrli88rionmdcfe!d,Pr,sccul.,orconlinqg|'iylitl!edaq,qid6epolicy+r||bc5o.l\:nde{EdbscC<lquayforcrtlE4.
b) To P$y rlr O&cftvis+ S€a0e Wil Pnrti.s Othr +r", the hs|r.rd or Wih lle I'*-rd l]r-:nar.-
(i) to pay ot orhsnr,.i,6c tcdc with odrel palri.s 6.a cr irr rhs E8mc of eo inrrred eiritunr dny €lda irrured egd*t uldcr lhis pol;d-y, t*gclhcr wiA ,ny coi{s.aftoraBys' fccs rDd cxrEq$e' i'cu[Gd by &t ir'.rrcd clsi',u.t v[isb rlrrc ndrdzed by tbo cosprny up ro rh. dmc of p*ymr ad wlicL ths coopony * oblig cd.b fty: ur
(ii) to 1r*y (,,( 9{hffwisc gcttle wirh (hc iDlufd clri&ul thc losa rrt dluuE. pr*rridsd far u'd.r &is lotijy, roEGtbcr q.itt *ny c*nsrr. !tror*)D' &c5 lnd cxpsn*a'i,!:.4rFd by tbe i!4rrcd ski-Es'u't whic'h r*urc authorizrnl by dr* coupeny up E-rh! risF of pdyrtE1t
'nrl wlirh tbr eo*untry iE obtitrF!€d !o !Ey.Upou thc eag6i55 [y thc Cortrps[y of cirhcr of the qrtiolr piovideJ for ia peragrqrhs OXr) or fu), th* Coq,sEy, E obliertioos ro thc irFrrtld u!dc! thir policy for tbc clnincdt{rs5o.dlu*gc.gtbarrhsn*up|yEF.Etsr9guir*lIobiErds,Rb,llrerBi!dq'inctudirrgaayli,&ifrtyotohliEdiouk'd'lf[d|PrDEccrrtsofcoddDu€
7, rrt"TERr[NATtON, tsXTENT OF LtABrLrTy AlfD CONSuRtNcE
Thirpdicyiercoorracrofiodemniwagrinrr5Eturlfb!lA!:rrl$55o'rderxges.rrtdacd6fiIcur.$Jb}thoi@ttcd.:ltriqadwtob*rffFIEd!o€sof.l!ranE|Ebyrd
of mgttcrr illslrrsrl tElilrst by rHr POIFCI ra{t osly to t}rt axlEBf bcrcir d.rcrihed,
{3) Thc liabilitJ of thc C(ryrry u!afi:. rh;* I'olicJ 6ba[ tr€t excead tlc krd of:
(i) the Au:ud. of lusi8nnee *r*Hd iE Schcdde * or.
(l} f[c diffs,Doc€ beF+.r!+! thc vrluc ofttrr iDF]rEd cstrte o{ ipt;ece ee -rAeur*d tdd thE vltEs O{lh+ iEr|rrtd
brrr.? itrsurt4 igiidrr b)| rhii polioy.
{b} lu thc cvct the Aooqar oflnru6 :t grcLd Lr s{h€dulc A rrttu trat* oiPolfoy ir lEEs thaa E0 pcrr,cnr ofr[c vnlu€ oftsre inmred csgtc qr irftn+d or rhc fttt cof;d!6rionp[idforth*l*nrt.rrtiow'(crislt**'orifgrbecq*:rIt{thEDatcofFolicyeniur9ovcrnsaIisc&.lGdonthe|*!dfvhichincrr$.5lhGvducofIheiEElrI
cslrtr or iltcrE6t by nt le.r$ ?O p+rccrr rwgr &c ArDoqrr of t$\|t- rsc ,trtcd iD Sciiduli A, then &ig polisy i, subjsct fo &s fofiowirtg;
(i) *ucrc no $uh$'lilucft i[rFt*v*'ru"r hat ba;a rurda' as t<r, s4r prnisl [rxs. th€ cotrErny 6tr l oDty p{y thE los$ pro r r io rhd p.eportio.. th.d rhc rooun of irr*urlrrtc $ Dftr Qf Fotisy troam ta de t(!t{l !nh!a <rf rha i(16sgd c$arc {rr ir4rF+{ at p'tc of,Foligyi or
6D *bsro e *g*q"co*i|IFtE'YsrDc.n tr\ ItscD Drrdc- .r to {tty !Er sl loss. thc compa!y 6bEr onry I!.y uc loss plo rata in thc prDf$rtioa t}Et 120 pcr.4!r ofrh.Atrfardr of l!a1|n'occ rutal ia Ssbcdulo A b6srt aD rha surrl of tha ,+r$oirBr of tErroe Ju!d iE sshodub A ,n ttc eeotrra s+rrda<l f<rr ttc LngnuvesEg(,TIEprovisi(u$0ftlrispora*qpbstallDolaP9ty[ocoJl$,t[o!Dcyr'f6cs*ol'c]q,cD5Gafotwhi:hfacodpatyiaJi|blsu!&rrhi6poti4y''!xlrbB!oy!p!ly!ofl
pordod af !!y toss which oxoceis, ia tls qgssggtc, I 0 pcrvcu of tbc Artprpd of ;o'ururcc .trtEd i! $+h€dul' A,
(t) Tbc Compuy will pty or )'&oRl co$nt, duoficys' fcr:+ tad EJqp€ngDr iocufsd iu ac+ordrDcc eilh Si+tiou 4 of theso Colditiooc rld Sti!,ul iolr.
$. APFORTIONMFI\IT-
If r-h+ lrnd dri+cribqrf is Schcdulc A coasirg of r*,tr or nnrc pu*ls which rrE not u*ed !s r sinsb sin. rad g locg ia csrrDli*hed etrcti4g one or omr of tlrc parc+lr nT Y *U, lhi tos6 sbtll b. coqui"d -a ,.*t"a ot t pra rata bui. !i, if rhs a-munt of ioarnnse uudcr |hir lxjrcy wi$ diyidcd Fo firr sg 1.) ttc riNtrrc .d pdT+ of lh,lhy ofcac[scparartpatcll{'tirvhole.cxc|urivi$fsnyimpK]vllDenlsEredc'ubs!q$+!ttoDatcoffoticy,ude.rxetirbi1ityorvrluc[aralhers,iscbeerragupmllb
cach garccl by tltc C*opany End thc insurcd €t tbc ti$rd of thc i$snms of thf policy art $awn b) an exfrr:srB !ilrtcmc$ or hI an ql+o{srEEDl rnaphd to tbi$ Folicy.
(cnmiruc* un e+orm elas pue otibit poltoy)
cdrtc or itlctcx. subjc4r rO th drfccf. lics or Enc$t3-
(ALTA (hvaeCr P.iky)
O6l29l?OD5 05:50 41625643E0
Contj.ouatiori of sc}ledu.le B - AEfe osaer's Palicy
PaJieY I\IdlDB.r: o-97O1'612i3
1998 as Receptioa NA. 672269-
#1?37 P.011 /0r.2
o6/ 19 / zD06 0sr{9 4162564380
ALTA OWNER'SFOt Cl'
#1?3 ? P.010 /0r"2
SCEEDAI,f' B
Otdcr |*ttabcr: 98ol 65t8-c3 Policy No- : o- 97 o I -6 42 i 3
This ptity tlaes nyt inswe agairasr /oss or day{rg* brd t4rr @pany wiil not W ffilts, attanwys'Fes ar dryeflrd$J
wlrich aritt by rrxon of:
l. Figfus or clains ofpa*ies inposses*oa, not iltown hy tle public rqsgrds-
2. fusements, or claims af eawwnts, wt sll4iwn fi; the publfu recods-
3. Discreparrcics, mr#ias in houndry lirtct, shonage in arca, ercroadttwas, and asry facts wlrirJn e corred
su@ oA tnryeaion aJ ttn genises rr.aosld dirdo$e *ttd tdfie}. are nat s&oxzr by thz pblie records.
4. Any lien, or rt$tr w * lien, Jor senices, Iabtr or material lreretolory or fure@er fxrnisb,ed, imWsed by law
and not shown hy the public re.c-ordt
5, Ilnpue*cd mining claint; rcserwtions or ?r@pfions itt pa,teflls, or an ffi auhorizing tfu iswanre tlnreef;
watr righn, claims or rtde ro vrqt€r.
6 " F.''ty and a-l-Z unpaiil texes arld asse-qsiretts and unredeee.ed tax sales-
7. The effe.rr of i.acf u,Eiorrs in any geaeral or epecific pater corrservarcy. fire
proXecxj.on r goil gl]n$ezvation or ot}}er distr.icf, or i,lelqsio.p jI E]try rtater
service or street i-aprovejt eJl t area.
8. RerserrationF of esceptiorrs contained in Ct.s- Patents. cr ijl Actt- eut.bori.sing
the is€uaJ]ce tI)ereof. recorded .SeFtezber 28, I9O4 in Book I23 at Page 3
reserviag 1) Rj.gnts o.f t}re pro,prietor of e vejn or Lode to extract and .renoue
his ore therelzom afid 2I right5 of ray for ditc}es and cana.Is c'ongXructed a/Jder
f,he aRtfrofjty of tAe Anited sf€teg"
9- Re5tric'tj.o&s. as coztained id iJlaxium4-fit .redord€d July 24, Ig70 itl SooJs ?I8 ar
FAge 381 as Recept:torr No.. 713872 t atd in.strurreflt recorded lvovefrbeli 17 r 7970 in
BoEk 219 at .PdEe 12Q as &eceptio4 llo- I717J1, alsl] a-tf id.al'j E recorde d ApriT 28,
J97 I in aoak 22O at Page 379 as Redeptiorr $o. 116033, aad .Laaeadmenx recorded
ApriJ 28, 1971, in Book 220 at Pag€ J8d as -R€c6ptjor No. 176034.
f0- .Ea.5e'?ents, tegtfictjons afld rjgilts-of-brays , incJ'u ding hut not littited to
ease.,lejl ta tor utiliXy and dralnage pl,rpose^s 5 feet in width e.ZonE t-he interior
l-oX Ji-nes as set out on pJet .rec.orded O(]to.be.r 7, 1970 -ia Eoojc 278 at paoe 799
a.5 Re'cePt i oJ] lto . I 144A3 -
ll. .Edsedeat griurted to Apper Eagle ya-ZIey saaieatioa Discrjst, by vaiJ
fD tcflftou.r] ta jrl A.ssoci4t-t, in t&e jngEsatncat rasorded Aqgrust 7, 797A in Boq,k ZIE et page 417 aE Reeeptjon lvo - J14008.
Z2- E Deed of ?rust dated OCI9EER 2, 1998, exesuted .by AIA.V PE?ER.S .eilp fRAilCftIE
PErER,s, Lo Xhe PubLie TrusXee af Eagle County r ro ,seeul.e aa j]ldebaedrress of
S?zs"AOO-oa, jn fseor of PHH &oRrGAes 'sgRvrgEs qORPORArfOT .recorded ogroB.EA 8,
C6.n tj.rrucd dr laerrt D.rde
t)b/ z9/ zuub Lr5:49 4J-bz5b{36u
Order Number: I 8a I 652 8-c3
#123 i P, U09 /012
SGflEDUI.EA
I.EGALDESCNP1ION
Ipr 6t
BLAtrX. 6,
vrr! rufERlroFrtrarll D.EPErpPIfEltf seaDrvrsJolv
asco-r'di-nE to tae zeeorded PJat thereof-
COUNTY OE EAELE
sfA?E OE COTO&TDO
uE/ rr/ 4u9a u5:+9 +tbt5b+5du
ALTA OWNER'S FOUCY
#1237 P.008 /012
SCHEDAT.E A
Ordt l*nber: 98ot 6528-c3
Date <f Poliq: ocxaber 08| 1998 at 5:I{ P.tr-
Awoxttt of Insw*nce: I 3'a,oao -oo
1. Nanu af lwurai:
FI|AITCTiIE pE?tRS .*rD a.Aelt pEtrERs
2. Ihe est*e or bxerest in tlfr lafrd lt*idt is covered by lfus paliey rs;
PEE SIUFTtE
3. Tith to IhE e,$Eate ar interest irt the lend is vesrd in:
^FRAICCflCE PETER.S AIfD A'.AJV PSEERF
4, W land referred w in this poliq 'u described aspflow.r:
SEE ATTAcxiED .LSGA' DESCRIPfTdfl
Poli,cy No. : o-97o I -64233
sb/ z!t tvub u5:48 4I62564380
ALTA OWNER'S
#r-23? P.007 /0t?
POUCY OF TTTLE TNSURANCE ISSUED BY
STEWART TITLE
GUARANTY CO.MPANY
SUBJSCT TO TIIE EXCIIJSTONS FROM C'oVERAGE, TT{E EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERACE EONTAINED
IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CoNDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, STEWART TITLE CUARANTY COMPANY, a
Texrs corporation, herein calleit the Compiuy, hsurcs, as of DatD of Policy shown in Schedule A' agaiust loss or dar
not exralilg fte Aurount of Inoura,oce stated in Schedule A, arvt*iled or incurred by the innrred by reast>n ofi
l. Title to tb6 6tatc or inrc*ect d€scribed ia Schedule A beiag ve*ed othrr thsr ns stated rherein;
2. Any dsfect in or lie$ or eocumtrrace otr fle title;
3. Unma*eaihility of tbe title;
4. Lrck of s rigbt of aoces*s to tud fton rhs l*nd
Tha Coupaly will dso pry ths rloqts, f,ttortreys' ftgs rnd experl.$cs incuffDd in defense of the title, as iffiurcd, brrt only
to tlre extent pmvidd ia |he C,onditions'and Stipulatioos.
IN WTINESS WHEREOP, Stc$/art Title Guxrsaty Corrpay has crused this policy to be Fi$reri rrd scsled by its
duly autbrieul officers s*s of the Date of Policy shsua is Schedule A.
STEWART TITLE
GUAR.AIITY COMPANY
Clrairen of the
cfflnter$ iqn€d:
forntersi
STEIWA}It TITI.E OF EAGLE COUNTY
Agid ID tr60058
not pry l+sr o. d{rnngc, dxts,
ofa crcdibr..
Sceial Ro. O-9?Ot44?33
. src Tg
FXCI.USIONTC TROM COYFJRAGM Thc foltgwifg {rrittcfg src fptq"dy txcludc{ f1.91s tlre cov*t*ge oflti* petiay fifid tis Conlpdny will
drotrrcyrr fdaq Ot cr{tc{$c* q&ic! *r*p lry te*+Or Of:
t. Jg) foy taw-. o:dir8rce.qt.gg'vemfiTte rogulatiod (inclu.ti'B but Eor lirEitcd ro buildir8 oqr, zoning laqE. ordi rffEs, or reAulslio s)n:srictirg, rcgoluing, pnrhihiring or reJarbg rrl (r] thc occrrpencl, u.sc, or cajoyncnt of thcisnd; (ii) thi sbaractcr. dirncnsion* oi tocarion
of rny imPm,vt;rncrlt tpw sr hcrcrflcr rrrcctcd oa rhc tarud; (iii) a rrpentkrn io owncrrhig or r cfisngc in thc dirncusiong or arcs of tjrc land or ltry pnrccl of qtic[ tts€ latrd i5 6r t["lt' tr p8.tl or iiv) eavirolnrertd protcction, or thi *trc* ofory violatioa ofthe$ ldws, ordiadncrs or .govcrnmcata.l rcsEletions, crc.pr b thc crbnt ttutr r ndile Of the Cnfotced€oi thereof or a *OtiCe O? r dcf€ft, Tk?r or encunbrancO rearrltias Itom. a violali(}n or eucgcd violsio'! sffe{tifi8 OtE lrol has leT $ecordcd i! the p*lic records &t D{te of Folicy .
. -(b) Any gl"*rn-cnttl polics porvrr not i*ludd by (a) otrOw, cxcr{rt to tlic cxtcrt Utat a noricc of thc jrcccirc ttrcr.oof or a notiqc of+dolcct, hrar er c$cq!*rrunct rcsulting Frpm a vlOlcrhn ot sllcgsd vistfltiof sffecti4g &e land bfi$ bg{d rc*ordsd ia lbe pubtic fecords Et Dats of Folic?.
2- Righti of ceia€{|t dodail unl€IBs tode Of tic cxr:ccisc thcrcof !y !"-t rccardcd in t]rc puhlic rccartl* rt DElc of Foticf, b|Ir aof *xcludi!,g.frsm {i"r'tgc ary uking wtich bx occ{'rcd prior to De of Poti.f wbtch w+uld bc birfuing oo tlrc cigD*s of a purcil;*# for "*lie viqo{e kio,*{qdEe,
3 - Defe+tE, lif*&-. tocus*rrarc€6. tdvkr{ ldliFs or othcf Drntra:
(s) cre{ted. r[ffertd, Essuo€d of.sgeed to by tlc iusrrEd cletorm;
(b) uot krnwo oo tfic ColnPrny, n* rpc+rdcd ia ttc p$Dlic !€oo|ds rt Dite of Foiicy, but ktrowr to txc ilrr red claiEsnt crd Dot disclosed ir
Yn-ttirlS: to &9 ComP.try bI t[? it}'rrtsd claitbffit Priof to the alate the iosuftd slaimanr bccaoc ar iar|rrtd undcr thir poliqy ;(s) rEerlting i! m tosr-of dad|*gs to tls iEcrrwrl eluimant;
(C) ffisuilg or ctr{atod f,rblequmt to Dar$ of Folicy; or
. Ql o"ql,t* t tors or dtrntgc whidr would not havc bccn m*aincd if thc io*urEd claiDro[t bad poid valqc for thc @rtc or i|ItEttfi iasured by this policy-
a._ dry clain, Phhh erircc aut of rhc u:anr*i- on vc*ing in thc In-qurcd tia ofitfrc or intcrcat inrurcd try rhis policy, by rcaxrn of thc of fodctal hErdtrt$E_v' sl*E insotvcncy, 6r Si-u|itet crcditorT' rightr tawsi thol is barcd O!l:
(o) the taasactiofl ertatitrg tbe essln or inlciltd. insucd by this policy bcing d€Emcit r fnuddfll oonvcyane or ftruitqlcrrt rr![0.] mS trt|ls8ptloll $e lllg l[& e$*c 0r mlEltsl. lluttLtd by thts potlcy bcrtrE d€Emcil d tliUdNfll oonvcyane or ftruihtlc||t tftrsfer; sr
(b) tln trrnssation cr€ating. thc eSatt or interet ilsttrrd by $it poticry b+ing dr*urd t Ftcfcriirtinl trEn:br anc€tt urkt rh* ptoftr€rrtia!
tm5liet trsults from thc. &itu*e: ti) lo tirqdy iemrd thc i*rrumeut of tnan-dcr; or (ii) of sl|eh rcqordation io i,EPifi aotico to a purcbusrr fot
06/29/2006 0514? 4L62564380 #123? P.A06 /A).2 tt\^ut:"te uP u
,, . 1' Seaion?
Order Number: 99076s28
.ffiCEPfIOItlS
Thepoieyorpoli€ies tobeiss'lddwillcottain g;ceptio,r$totht fotlawing wlesstlusutt'e arcd*posedof todle
saisfaction of the hnPanY
I. Riglts or cldims aJpaiies mpossasion' not shawnfu rhepublic rewrik'
2. Easmlenx, or clums of ensarcns, not shoY"n by the public records'
J. Discrepancia, corfiicts in boundary lfuus, slwnage in area' ud any fam whidl d corred
suwej *rA Atpeitor of du preinis* wodn discloit ad which are not stwwn by tlu pnbhc records-
4- Atry liot, or ngfu.to d lien, for scrrtices, l&or or heraofore or hermfitfianishd, itnposed by law
aid nor slnwn by tln pttblic remrds-
5. D€ecg, Eans, stsnbrmces, adreneclaimsor otlurms,fren, tfanry,-sraeLftxt appeafingintheptblic
,"toras or afraching EubEeEttEfiI m thc Seaive dae hsEsf, b$ prtor.to tlrc datc ilte proPoied iftsffed acqaires
o! remrd.fur whe the qtae or intr.4st ot ftongage frtaeon coverd fu this tonuflinnst-
6. Arydszftn ftini$g clairns; ruenlrfrirzlt or rr;cqtiow l 'patalts, Qr En dfi ailtltorizing tlze Esttance thaeof;
water rtglw, claims or title n waen
T. AD}- aad tJI unp<id E*:E rs aBd Ea6eaaDeats cnd aalr urrrede@ed tEJs gllct-
E. tAe effect of izc.IusJoas il a4r gr@sra.tr 9r speeiflc t Ettr csEltefitaacy, file
protedjEioi, coJi coa.gars-acica ar of.bgr digtrJs6 gr i-uciaeianr la *ay *a.ter
gcriee dr sEreet inIrnve/teae rrar-
9. F+saretiolld or:. r*tt2pEic,DE codeal.Ecal i-D. V.S. .Patcat,s. or i.a .tctE arlttsodsl.rg
tJre lggutac e fh,er:€F.t, ragorrded .EePternbcr 28, 7941 iE BooF l?: at hge 3
rcse.r?i.ug 1) ltjgfitg of tle lrfolrrietor of n veis or .Iodc to ersEEact .o5 ss4ovc
-hi^s ore t-&erief:ioa a!.d Z) rjghxg of rlll| fo.r ditcAes aatl cran.lg canstrueted |rdder '
tle autbarlty of the urrited.gtaEes.
10- r,estrl,ctiosp r as co[laja€d ja ilgtrr@ett recordad tru7-y 24' 7970 lE Boorr eIf, at
Prrgre zaI as ^eecel'tjo! ftp- a13872, and ia.struEeaf reeardtgd .ttoifEabcf 77. 1970 in
Boo.k 279 Eg pagr+ 720 es "Eerreptioa !ro- 114734, el-eo affida7,c.X tceotd"d 81rrit ?8.
7977 tft Bools 220 at Page 379 tE aeceptiolr tu. !!60i3, ead .euea&csE recsrded
rirril ZE' 7977 fu Aook 220 ax Page 3t0 ag.Rcsellsiog Ne. 776O31.
1I. E&€caeEtu. reatsLctstoss rqd rigAto-of-vays ' lnclfug:.bug Eat liai ted to
e**a€Etss for u,El'ILtX, rrd dreiargre lrrrpdseg 5 t.at la rrdtb elongr th€ i.utarior
Iot .Liaes aE Eet out oE I'lrt .reeordrd Octsb€r 7, 1970 Ls Eook 2.76 ,t Pag:e 799
a.e .Eeeelltloa tu. 774401 -
12, gesaaat gaanted to IIFI?eE ErElc Yal.ley AraJ trtlod Distzict, by thif
Itrc+rEo,tt!.tlr.Lu .ts.soeiafes, ir tle ie.ctr8eE redorded a$g(rsf 7, I.970 l-a aooft
"34 at !a,g'e ltl7 as BecaPEtaE JSo. tf4ood.
06/ :l9/ 2AA6 0s:46 4162564380
,lr
#L ?3? P,00s /012
SCHEDALEB
Se*ion I
OrlerNwnber: 980a6528
KEAUIREMENTS
The follnwing ere the requiremats to be complied with:
Itqn (a) paynmt m or for t}u a*coufi qf rte gr@rtors or mottgasors of the{all cowidcraion for the esue or
ilterest to bt insured.
hem(b) Properinsrwnent(s) crfuAStlw esmteorinterest tobebtuednwst be*ea$edand fuIyfildfor
record, to wit:
1- EFjd&6e s:tlsfacaarlr fo ,stevarf fltle Guarasff Co||E'x.ay of lra5raeut oE e77
ontgtEBdJagt tarEes pld a.eeeEsDaatg as cezxLftrd ly tne Bagrle Cgtt'rty fl.ed.eutef.
?. tuecr:tiaa of affjidav:t! e.' to Debts rld EieEa a,3d itt !€tEf4 Eo .Stcrart nitle
eualf .!ty cwrFny -
3- Rrclease by ?he PsItJ.Jc frr:.stee df E EL. gotrgtl. of ttrc -Dc+d o5 Ulruat .frofi! .Iase
FprErrondo aad ADrb.lt Fcrrt codo fsr the u.ee of Fl.rst federa.I F+'k af C.rlasado to
seglrse S1sg,ooi.00, dr tcd octabcr 26, 7996. ,reqotdcd ifoveaber 6. 1996 ia Soat
770 at E'.g;e 764 as 8a6! rrtiod No. 606713-
4. Deed froF r}lcse rErtnoEds a$d ,B-hD[r fiortnssdsr ?estfugr fes ri.ulrle title l,n
l?r.acirre iI. .Fcfars -
NCTEE i EC'IATTOE gF Iffi ,LAGA.tr ADTEBSS OF gffi @AIffEE fllIST TIFEEA.A OlT IE .DEED I,5
pEp re76 ^btcflutEi:P ro srafu:f,E ar tBcoeD.Ers oF DsEDs eRs 58-35'-rog (2) .
5- Deed of 2tllst fros tbrr EorroFl:r to the PtIEIld lrrrs tee for tbe IIse of f,he
p*roitosed lartdez' Xo
',ceElFe
tte loa.a,-
6- A ataey, aeetilg ttre .ur.{.ai.urn detai-l. sta',.le1dB oE th€ AIrTI,/ACSI{j sdzyel. or
LEIrro,FcE €at &ocatioa Certificate, rtrepare€I 5r e =egristered So]orado zttttfirct-,
arjihjn tle Iade &E @'lfjs, t t'*t be;rresented to St.Eaft Tiil.a GuaE-aty
cffipaay, for its ayg,E}val ltrlof fo tlc dgiettoa al znTr EiEEvey erEcelrtJdsa fr€e
t&e 3s"a loaz, pliey to be Jggued .bcrcunder or the i.s.suasce af Eor::a I40 oa t&e
^r,!l tu4an Peljcy.
,Stertart t{t.lc duarazttrr reserFes tbe iigLX t€ EA&+ +XselrfloE'
to a:ay adwerse'.uetter: es sbopa on sald avfrelt. or .oel<e ftrrgler iryu,i,y!, os
requireoeata $alrtjnr thareto. Stcrart title Guareaty furtlcr reacrlres q,ts4t
rigrlt to nrclude fsq Fors 10O corrr:rage adlr adrug! ara+-berg it aay daa.
tta:!5rElt-lf-
sr{d $+'fr'vyr. .nttlrt Ee rrertified E€} .Eterart fit.Ie of EagrJe @uaty
aad,fat gfp".rt fl.f,'?'e 6u*reaty Crya.af-
.UoIEr EEEECXTVE S*qE!44 7, 1997, cES 30-20-1Of SEQUXIES tmf
ALL Doctrffils ll RBcEflraD FoR P,a&EDa!tr aiB EELwe ff gB crrEEr Jtl@ &EcaRDR/s
oEFjECE dErAtr CUrtIlIf A rOF -ueaclEr ell r.Pr+r drE IreE.at@ r &EFr, BrdElr t4D
Bg:lZtlil r4actr oE At I'ErSt trE-ELLF E!rcE- EB ctEEx,.re 8;#GEDE rflrr rEFugs ro .EffiED O& .SEEE !n:r DO@!l[r !:Et!f Dc]Ea .Eb:r eoltfit&u-
vE/ z5t /,\)rb q5 i 4b tJ.bzSb{JEU #r.237 P,0 04 /012
SCEEDALEA
Ord.er Number : I 8016 5 28
LEGALDESETruIAN
r#E 5.
BI#E 6.
E'rF trcrEEt@uFrr.4r DgHE['oElIBf,I SgBDrfirglolr
ec,clcizrt!-ug, ttt f.Ee tecolidad PIac ttereof'
cE.UN,Ig OF ETdIF
SXATE OF CODOEADO
ZE7:E Caracrn@1f fil,s PEEPARED oll .dseFg! 5" 1998 Ev Frttr 3rd:II,t]R- FOA OtlA5tfo,mg
FnEesE catL xrcEHr'trE EtmgPEEE At (97O] 925-0230.
T?,is c'a@,larEt js satti for
ERAtrCIIIE PflRg
.ro.5E ^e.uD elgv Foa:rooalDo
/sndIa ecHmrl.r.la
.EEff FEZTE
vd/tlltaab u5:+h +rbl5b43du #L237 p,003 ,/012
?,-t scaffialEA
order Nuniber: 9ta76528
I- EffeAivedate.' .7trf,:r 74, 7998 ab 7r{5 ^-ld'
2- Policy or Pahcies to lte issud,: Attwrint of Insurwce
@ A-Z.fe. OrMrEr's (Staaderd) S 35o,aoa'a0
ProPudhxwed:
ERA3{CJ}IE rr, FEIIBE
(b) A-L.TA- InNr
Proposed Insuted:
ro Bt Dtr&RlcriEp
{c} Lasehold
Proposdlnsurd.:
fstaadsrd)$ a45,ooo-oa
3. The 6tae ar blrr.elt in ftE furn dEsaibd ar r{en:ed to in this C.'rttttifrr?eftt and cwered lerein is
fee si.agr.Ie
4- Tttletoiln fee siaple 6wRoritfrzrestinsaidlandisuthe$eAivefueher*fres;tedin'
.'osE PoErRqaDo aiD ^lBar FoErgoilvDo
5- TIE land r$erred n in th* hnnihnent is dtsuibed as follows:
8EE ATrI'-EED JircE.& .OESCB'P:FIOT
Puqlortld ,ie?e s: STATEMENr OFffij&GN
Thqedrrr- ta ofidxe stdWtable @ore a
?9.55 .BErilEEr,orER DRrgB poliq can be isstd/:uhlr., co 87657
FREI T@(. orulEed,- !,o3s -a0 l4rElEircc.- 100.00
WE .!Ev'r: 80. O0
J6/ t9/ ZAOb 05I45 41625643bU #L237 P.0AZ / 0L2
',ntrt*Ir"ann"
COMMITMENT FOR TTTIE INSURANCE ISSUED BY
STEWART TITLE
GITARANTY COMPANY
SIEIVART TITIE GUARANTY COMPA]{Y, ATcx*r Corporation, hercincelled &cCompany, for
valuable considsatioa, hrrsy connnits to issue its policy or policies of tirle insurauce, as identificd in
Schedule A, in f*vor of *re proposed lffured naacd in Schdule A" as offtref or EorgagEe of the e$arc
or ilrter€st cowred hqeby ifl the lfftd dmcribed or referrcd ro in Scbeduie A, \+CIn paymem of fre
prppi$mg ard chafges frirefor: ail $ubjcct to tlre provisiols of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions
and. Stipulatioss hef,Eof .
This Cornmituent ahall bc cffective only ivlr€n tbe idedy of tbe propooed Insured and tbe amurnr of
thepolicyor policie+oommilea forhavebeeninscrtdin SchetuleA hereof bythe Company,either
at tbe time of the issuaffe of thi$ Cmmitf,cnt or by utseque* endorssEsot,
This Comnitmfft i$ preliftitary to &e issuare of $trch pdicry or policies of tifle insurrnce ared alt
liebiluy and abligarions brreunder sh*ll cease and uminaie six months after tbe effective drre hffeof
or whEn lhspolicy or policies commited for shall issue, whichevr flrs occurs, provided that thc
hilwe to issuc s$ch policy or policies is troI the failt of &e C@patry.
Sigd uDdtr seal for fte Compaoy, but this Commiuuenr shall not be valid or biding ud' it bears an
authorized Couutersi$aulre.
IN WTINESS WIIEREOE SterrnrtTifjcG$rantyCoryanyhas cflrseditsc4rpomtenzme'ndseqlto
be hcreunto Etrxed by its duly aufrorired officers on the drte shown in $chedulc A-
STEWART TITLE
GUARANTY COMPANY
Clr{irna!, of the
5TF9IART TITL.E OF EAGII C.Q$NTY. II{C.
P-O- For ?0@
VeiL Col'orrdD 81658
{9/0) 949.ror r
I t.
JOINT PROPERTY OWNER
WRITTEN APPROVAL LETTER
a joint owner of property located at
provide this letter as written approval of the plans dated
which have been submitted to the Town of Vail Community Deveiopment Department for the
proposed improvemenG to be completed at the address noted above. I understand that the
proposed improvements include;
Mr
Additionalln please check the statement below which is most applicable to you:
Q-/ f unaentand that minar modifications may be made to the plans over the course of the
'rccess to ensure compliance with the Townb applicable codes and regulations.
D I request that all modifications, minor or otherwise, which are made to the plans over the
cource of the review process, be brought to my attention by the applicant for additional apprcval
before undergoing farther revr'ew by the Town-
(Initial here)
vor 5
o /'" " ,, ,^ /-
"'Y;':"t::?A('.cAL
, , ,o!bz, or,,,r, ,& *,,, [4, *r,i
,,, ,u]
-a-,i-rTw- t,/
[.----;.=-J | / .,/ ,/ ----a--tf-{*r,ffiu;;/-#-r- '/'f /a,vrrsvroxu."-'/ t /7----=------U
.,'',, 1
wtu9ao /
Io(o unJe
Attachment C
Ut(re W WAD
5' ufrurfi L gq-awp<&
a\*}{'e$f ,. ,4 0 -ffi_.),'
LoT b
g,ot-v 5
ll.
7l
Lt,
?
0(A
M l!-)
-J/
.J
tJ_
J
J
UJ
{0
vor 2-
AaLY 5 , / rTj l--(' ,/ i/l"U //,,ffi]
( [**L,X
\ / AuDtToF' a-v €ffietq \ru /).- WdieP / I urt-tl awJL \LI IY
/ r", *uf+ot t I ' 5IhtR Fotf UewUt<t/ I Io Errlfn't(t voul# I uNrr fHu q
t/-6"r,iw
/'v?*trr ro cf!{LtaltT ,+e e4./r' /,i ,"
r7
= ; /l ,l tt' l;7A / r ,/14#'1,,t/il w /,[l /' t // t,,,1 ,l/' ,ltr
i-r t,,, |,,, \ / iW?KINr,
5, " l', :,'Yi/,ll /,:kl-t+ +Lr {'
//,i/'/, l/ll l/El /'
' / r'eItVtJ'tL w$K* o/ ,/,"/ w$6ff /'//t*wr;ffi'^
)ITY FLAN (N
\DZ
Wf:*1fl $:itWH:"H| 1"-'1o"- o" wFrr,
t&., JoO +11271 vkfeV l2-oo.
Eftte W
DFrvaLr/r/
qYY YAAYITI6 .r7h(E (I!?tc l or4)'
==H*
..-\j
'qffi=--.----
4l Exl;r,r.(?I / APJFFzIIT
-, t ?pr?-ytt6 UN+
t7 tr7p.\v 2oog
\\,\\.,r{\lt i+ lb
7gt6 ./
etue * Tpagosev poNDArroN
Fg-sugMlrrAL el
t1
G wTri
rErEgS F?5tW-$4. ADD|TI og
Lm 6, ruo+ 6/ YAIL lr.rrzg.1.1oup*,n ptt. svg-
2q 5' va-LrLddv?, vr#an_ * 2ro3*7o"o7
\h\Lt aoI-oRADo
evr ?VL
-t'4 '..',.\
.tt .tt \
,/
.'4\, ,'{
.,t$
+,^\*vor 6
o.t1e-
7ft-
x LtHtff oF.
DtsfrJFpA{.'CE
ft+rctNG
-t- ./'
*
vo'( +
LOT 9
?Ntb o?
Yoxo
F^<YttrG @s6.eg
yhn 0p|f
< tooo ffi,"r.
HAtr.r Ul.tlf
> 2!M e,fr,< 4oo0 ra,?r,
t?rya. (aa{1pta
2,6?xeS
? s?A(es
5 XP(&s
4 sr*tzs
*n"nt
n9(
s u-
t
t:ul
1A
)
t-F
7 $a
I
\II ca
v $l r
?^"FI N6 VIAIJ ACEHE NT P LA N
?fofoseg
Lr e*u- ?U*r"J our)
7rlot41 g-To?AAz
u4t{LUAY AF A .
QN4ruDrFrG P^N)
lrourSTo?.h(de . qll x ,7 =
(ulr f{€ArraD D?wg1
lql F
21V + w@ot?-Le
ext'tlrtG ?JaF- oF
Vof n PFivE),lA'/
?HT
6H r -?l' I xa,fi
E
=*<i3o
u*$g
6tE$
6><Sr-
H r'S -'
-v 5 pss
F.oil r ilJ k&A- _l
N
#,"*iaP
oi?*
l"--lg> gu
\\
Lor(o \ \
o,1o rc+++
, ---\ t;-=\---:
fqrXv tr?^ LoT 6 0,t1brp,9,|-o = 0OZ5 fi glat Wo LAND4zA?rr.r6 %7z6\,Fq = +t++ fi (urrrH E*u)
zurr.Dru6 Yorw?-tft gFwe.vN \
Qprrrtrr ?rcVeaea,
6%)o(*f a\r;er4glq
lrxtlo:{,/t?e c4vc)t ATl ohls
.*j-2,Yi+Y*- --'.:i-,fr<,---nZYt,,-n v
\/\/4 az'
lo"5 fr
?oo fi
?2oo il
zst fr
toot fi
Y
@gY ll:p^H^r (rpy / p-rf,rfiAr{ )hqlaige(+; Lr^Lfuky
(mr+,rr+ Psu)6t Avel N4&il Al
!nd,N-e wi spe/ NoFtAs{ve
hrrdoc,*t@ l&h)
f.r!ft- ... . _ ....\ lgo b
o$wrear+6tr\Y*-r)
ul6-rtvo
?tW r.- ...\ gZOil
vev%, u/61#{/9t)w
Lntlvqca(E nW 6,315 +
LoT +
TP.*A
6 o
s
J (
k
D
h (n
J
F
7
CD ?!n I s
s @*'
NafrH
z1-..'LP
6nT
-.\"FB T KA cd ?i zt FFts
eErr H;ts
$iil {
il*fr
Ss*
F\&NT LruzfD
tvn"
,g''n#
&u"
6H r
F1$
gqut
fr><$i
uE{ *
$lt
[tEs
o o
&
J
cL L
t
F ul (n
J t
E t
cs )
I
u
\)s
^56W+f Lttre
\
ffi0P(4 \uNu
\
---\
w?offi
zcrurlil \l,$/our \
I ,r --t-OF
Pr?o'E F
r
I
{---*-ll ir\f---T--l-
I unEr..?oJW
I
WL OF
agvmoN
P6E
_p)r_+
uae$
-
.Lr5
MAI}I UNlf
MToTtL ll0,
Vw*Wbv W,
(rtoo*.5t) -
-6w
(#,tsrF.L
wa9+
A
lU vl
&.
'f 2
5s
{r
r.?
tv
A
ut
vt s L t
2-
6a
\0-
\
\
W"e oe
&fi6e
kv9rt'o$Nle \_ A
Y^l9Wc, util6'
tu f4',ftlt
finc L
r-lf
l-+
vuexS),aq \ht LEI
45%
r-,{
1-11
L?\VR LE\/EL
)s Irt|^ENSroNS lre w o\rT,We
oF hil5l{ w 9ifrreY.
L\llbl6
I@
Orz,lt -(zru ,rr,r)
Al oFa
t/glt--l-gtt
Yfi* oF tave(
?oo( \___r _u
x -i!
F tl :ill
\o
wrPtp6 fut*.*'
LINE
F{ttTt116
UMt "ro
9t*
5fi1tr A"%AGL
u0il4 p ge
Aeatn rrL
c(o,S.ttt(@Vo t&e*ffi
ffe*D (ffi*
Afr-64t#
q)r99
(D
8 N
J c q-
b
J
F F t 6
VT
I p
\)
R
o
ft\
N MAIN LF,/?L
@r+ Elltetta ll00
6ffrh f€Drnoil
llttftnt ffi9s6a +?t
o\)tr, #{'|h('/K L\}l
at$& wEfio|t
<*f* p*t
ttftN
-7oO
Vxsfl)t6
O ApprnoN
,t1E @rtry.,P6e
wkv
ALwakgtL
gLQffi r- ,LS '-
llo0
1?l5
_tsa6__+
2t564
lF
l€wwtrr,
J W^6 fro?tft. Fooft(*.
0? e*$7t.<) oA ?(oWgW
ljrTttrrl bq.VNl- oA
Wo?cgeD olutb!f/e *J'W#'
DtMtr+rt|orlt
'trulJ
A#fo an\ee oF t4*rrt}!o - Aft',A w oec$ Prw To 6.?,F.A,
F8 .E 9r.141s9 ,t+taI*rlJ(t,
(fuir 5AW
LINL
A2nt
3tr
FaH l-i -r t
?FE
EEt{1Z(LJ H, f S
$lHt
p:$
Eq*
Ulll,'l ro
Se rovn
1l?t(+r
loulO
o
\
,\
6FTA fOTALS
1-
t
I
I
I
I
l+1wa"ra baovee @rh6l
-WH..l;'ttl!'G?eo?o1?rt Dlfl|tN 56,Qx4 27
W4?o*o }l0til.!,e ffi.gttcF,
O Dr$elstor.t5 bwvlrr k?ep - ootxtge q ff4ilill"tc-NeA
lrP|s vaht PtfrWlo 6,F,th.
toq y1.' ?*'rvlW- 9HeAfWN6'
V??W WJEV
6(?A?tr51tsyo
6FTA ADDI1ION
urfiht 5r49A(r
d€+ gt*q,
6qa
6((h TlrPr-u?w
5r?
t5t4
115
o
o
o
Loae&
MAIil
$7??,&
6WA IOTFL
AVtodA.'V|E
(8rl,tAf,/ + Eltu)
br.rD5t0 6.*,F,4,
*o
CD o o N
:l
!L s
t
l-
$
J
!-i s 3 (rr
I
s
24fi
(o2-
fi5F
tos6 6
44c+ 6 -1l;;* \]
it h{+rgpros frP{- ro \E 0vr50e
,F FrPr9F ft?. a*vf,l ,A? ot+
f We?uvl
ul v \9
rU
s'
vrO
d$
2t €fl ai3 gt{
H $$--,s0 *t r
,0'3 g
ST 0tu dcs
*'S
rS 3
Z o
tr
A
e
U
'ilt
n
s-u !J-
s u
fi o-
l+rl d
lg"=lt'o"
6Hr
Fmn IA -r ..+nE-Fr#$\<? $n
Hq$$
16 f S;-
Hg$ *
$*$
Fts
PMo\,e ND W!tA&-
b{6Tfdto UlhW lW
urll+ 1/J0'' MA,IEE|AL frs
hffg4vtr-g Pi Tlrg TouFr
0F tlklv wtvPtpc (tft
_ffi
w
w" tna4. d
"b12.+z
r
WlUfa* TFM AorP
v44-nart Lt@ atulatQ
T0 Hr(f4H EXlS'np6
1\?tc*v
CO o q
s{
J *
q
h
J <
F
=A
a ,lu g
ll ff++l*F- -+*lJ r-- - -,tJ1
llll
A4 *+
lL
e,L5 fil
,Atmt,e{Ei
'1r-,l- -+
Ir r]+
W+
_ffi+tr 4
-J
ro o a N
J
E
t
$
J
E
cs
a
I
u
\)s
I !),
I
I F F
6gorfl
EAtrNc Wz,oG
L--.lK rL- j
6
L A A
U
&A
fr
04
V)0t
P #
iF
?$E'n FO Z"tP Q -rr- r?f- -rr {Ed*tdtJ -ss
:$i lL lL-\)J oul dcA
r lJ\\o lt,
\K
Dz"T EVEUATIAFJ
W'-'t>d'
6Hr
-*\t {-Fts 6I+
?E$^
H
q$$
*h >oSr
u$qt
B*fr Iss
rp
E
R.l
-l c $-
tr
h
J
E t t$a
g
\)s
rW p|x*. O lttc+t f,
?rr711P6 n+Z,oO I
w
w-
No?.N ELF;V{TION
l
AG *+
Ya"=lLo'
L W'uM -\rw-
4W-
W-
Frt
-fl Az.f AR6 <F 3 p
HEilI
ft3il':-S.o! g
F- .)4 t+
p$n
HT$Li
A? ,'+
'0t'-lio"
wr ev:euxlotf
fiT,y \
\
!6Vtu+. \upe
W?offi
loLrJFlN \l.Avow \
I rl --af--- il
WtV oF
Wcv. PrPo&
-m@'ryry) \
@., ^
u.s)+ It r" *.6)= lo14.0l
I
I r--
O'X" vn''iqlo,w
waw LbwL
Lt6e$
-
r.1Alil Ulttf
fr9 T/T4V
vw(6ev vw'
(rtoo*.9 - lY
vr+ 4 ,/
%5 zfi
ufrerqoqd, ilrAufuon
(loro*ttr1r--) - qh.6
4 ul
tn
8.K
UJ 7
N$r N)i)
s
s
CL \9
E
-)
s
qE%
t,{
+E
rf F--t
Av"e &
n H$e
k99fltol\
xoole l)
GFrAfc/r L
wa9?
Y)4lTlt11 ,JPil"L5 p y+aant
finc L
96Wo(,
UrJe
VNEIPD\
l-*'f t-,..1
L7d€R l?\/v>
X fiMENSroNS AFe To A,/FSlpE
oF hdleH PeF 9W-vAY.0F+
KH r
-_: o
Ft$Qit^
eE${
Hr-"S fr>usi sid s
fr*fr
[q*
L\{lN6
I@I
Orz,tL -(zuu urrt)
'/bt'--rLo"
r,",rS)?
A)tnua stft M*<+Arv
6ffn /opmol
r\
)rttt}t'/ 6l ffi$NA Lbt{l*Gb.
mM. xo?.[o -zt) + e@;,) -IJJ;#
+5q rb -+1'u 6 = 4sq.t5
V- 5I+gffrrtdb,
L.l5
UAUJ' fo
be NveD
Nev26 tnlrl rh = 1,L1,\l"'trt\ Lf - - -- Q
1'o+L4't'* t'uL \J
|oo /
lUJ
LCt r'
-7oO
1/h+t$te ftt"t'
\+s{-\9
s\
z_5
yxrrr16
AHtt Io (tqrlA.E r1-rl.et lt t ls
'-- bqs &)' "trt
5l1V A,r%AGL
,JN)h p 9e
heeto rlL
etu,s',wo N4 wrb(6
WosA G*a4ffiW
qpES
llo0
6\ ApprfloN ns'/\'/' XA?,rl$1t |4t,+,)-o +tl=
VAsnf6
9r1v @{q.P6e
ltrFv
^LwakqE ge?4.% >+ ,L5 -'
_tst7__+ /
Lt56+
F(oFIT 'W
f+l oaves FooraoE t- 0( r.xr6ftFl.6 oB Wo?oS@ vtly't{ 56-V*(+. oA
VC"e qeV rrtr5lDe ?A'V^{*,
qlry,tuhuo2'
Srhun VL +
A2 *+
J '-l vbcK il,-.E
rl F*F-aru' li *V',.$
L
ll-- rl
y+ttB\
t.t
__-_-_J-.1 gwfeA
116-^1L6'
NEw wlrJ
6W A0ellloFr
o,klrle, ol'?tqr^in|
(a*rr)+ Ut. 6.1^'t@
%- lvv<\\,\
(ttrtt"+4.6r h.i \
rtv(/w)=
V$tLnlrG 9t9€
fu*cx
hN€
q+i A\5{'
o 6r* .Y!lIxv:$l Amnrt *JbkCX
9vil. ffiaKx ' 'tN4rLo
a4+@ WEllort
I Llr{v'
6FF-A 1?t-At
l'lArrl
CO I N
J
!L $-
fts.
lr ul \A
J s t-t o )
I
ut oa
a s
$2-+ + J
6ur E(*A-+Ais
i a$r H, sS f;"fr-u$t'
$:$
Eq*
\ft,,=lLO^
Ll-
O DlMt+rSrorlt
'|tpAlJ
A&fo
anSse oF f4ft'"|ittr(,'A,',A
tn'- ,e*P Poe?..D To 6,?,F,A,
€AN W L*TYFOF 5I+(AIT+N6.
,ol"$ WVh{t'A?tllWN
l+* n'- 100
-t^\)_)
5
{\-\-sL {g
/u$Wnlrto
(t+rw+tt) ! '
filppr,torw raoh(e @$6e
-w
E?(t6rrdo 4rco?oAee tJlflilN *r.QR4 67
l@?ateo ovr'we 56' ortq'
o) DrileN9rodS iWA)J N.efo
0oratve q ft#D{'-N9^
wffi veh) Po0w10 6,F,F,A.
foP l2' Y-*t?.lsaf- *1r,F-fl-+t|t6.
v??w wlov
6f+^ ?rt5lrrYi't il x M,$' 6$9
Q artn lpDl{loN
Vfigtg57;gh<+ 214
ore+ eerh*c+ b2-
6F?h Tar*
u??9r
tt$z 5
6Y-?A fdTAI,S
o o o N
J !l L
r|
ri
$
J<F
s
(rl
I
rlJ g
A Lou-g
O Met*
@ wve*
6Kh IorN-
ALL,AMTE
(mrunpn + Etru)
uf.ru5t0 6.h,F,h.
:tt /
lStl "r
11e /
,f 7o?66 J --__llro 'W6 J
NIb 3,qb1v
ftwto lile
W(. 5*\e4.ft? or+
Io*at4=a0+
?M +6o, llo
1-.06
::-.* -\\.\
I - -r-\ 7"gP*'" \!
l( DM9itrlclrJ & (tpttvr
.z dl t- '\ fts O\A p
Fn$X zY € ES ^
vfinI
Ar,*$frsu r
H gi E
U:J
$ s$
*t ;S fr FS o-3
\ /.
{ \ lz4ol wvrooYr.+Ei I
m^l
F|,______,\ lcxz
rt 0?nWYl UI
w u \t il
Yg"=l''o"
{et6J
Kipqpqlsl
O!sg[ rluoD l4oott+7Lt 0ol
t, 1r01e l iwbtxia vgtt" v(nhttlh bt'L
llatw,:*'upq | {ev, co 0tWt7 ffi*:
E5-s6 ez ee 5.s6 ez :' Bro
7\n\
29tt8 t
r[nterlor
\\Cond
\\\r
3\
tr.zsss
'"t*
.--A
pt
21
2940 ,3\
3007
At
x
48tL
1o Vo
UEI(. btbTT
I tPt.
Uvhs? ,ilrrPv J., e Hm,t M.
?o Wx +l/,
Yav, b. 0lb$b
66i hhttltovt{t
il61'N@gy11
S11-u,.*-
W le ild4711sog
30044r'
L0( E Lto?t+ro?ooc
&o 0199
'{dtfrio^**ooq
| ?ffi>cp,Cfiflf rlw;,wffi#;,l lf@,chlc 1.
{ | 1,76L-&UWvry* V-I v/tfc, u. UbqI ;* (muc'wt)
116 l&,?o fle'7n
Tl?'g'tttc hfinfrt0 Plrl AYI
C^rtfrgh
,t Jl tAubn*to, fn%ry - cqtl tutilb
?a Vlt 1tb
Y*tv, co. 01659
n97 WA'^rrttL fr)O
tlrTl Vt#alt6W.
TOWN OF VAIL
FILT COPI
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the
Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town
Code, on April 28, 2008, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in
consideration of:
A request for a final review of variances from Sections 12-6D-6, Setbacks, 12-6D-9, Site .\,\ O^
r- .l Coverage, and Section 12-6D-11, Parking, and Section 14-3-2F, Other Requirements, fft'^t\-- ,',,9
Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a ' rl - \0' " 'qf residential addition and remodel with required parking located partial within the public xf ,r right-of-way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and \P"
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080018)
Applicant: Alan Peters, represented by Karl Mueller Planner: Nicole Peterson
A request for final review of a final plat for a minor subdivision, pursuant to Chapter 13-4,
Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a re-subdivision of the Front Door Site,
located at 151,250, and 280 Vail Lane/(a complete legal description is available for
inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department upon request), and
setting for details in regard thereto. (PEC080019)
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company Planner: Warren Campbell
A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed update and
review of the Vail Village Master Plan, pursuant to Section Vlll-C, Adoption, Extensions,
and Amendments, Vail Village Master Plan, to affirm the applicability and purpose of the
Master Plan, located within the boundaries of the adopted Master Plan/(a complete legal
description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development
Department upon request), and setting for details in regard thereto. (PEC080020)
Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: George Ruther
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection
during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South
Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that
precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.
Please call 970-479-2'138 for additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please
call 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Published April 11, 2008, in the Vail Daily.
t'qffit 3JfiT
. - 'r!,
ar I
***1.*++t*********+tt*i**+*i+***++++*+++++++++++*++*fi*a*r+r+++++++++++++++f+**aa+**+a*+t+++t
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Stat€ment ******f***f**t******f******************************f**t**t*********+*********************+*+
Statement Number: R080000331 Anount: $500.00 03/25/2oo872:58 pM
Payment Method: Check Init: RLrF
Notation: Alan Petera
1L07
Fermit No: P8C080018 114>e: PEC - Variance
Parcel No: 2!03-L43-o7oo-7
Site Addrees: 2955 BEL,L,FL,OWER DR VAIIJ
Irocation: LOT 5, BI-,OCK 5, VAIL INTERMOUIiITATN
Tota1 Fees: $500.00
Thia Palment r 9500.00 Total AIJL Prnt8: $500. 00
Balance: $0.00
ACCOI]NT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Des cript i on Current Pmts
PV OO1OOOO31125OO PEC APPLICAT]ON FEES 500.00
Vc.il S"^\a-'A,t,^,
GNEtz / L6+k
Dqarmznt of Comm*nity Deaehpment
75 Soath Frontage Road
Vail, Cohrado 81657
970-479-2r38
FAX 970-479-2452
www.uailgoa.com
March 3,2008
Alan Peters
2955 Bellflower Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Re: 804-0160,802-0380
Dear Mr. Peters,
Thank you for coming in to pay the plan check fees for the above permits. Your
account is clear regarding the above mentioned permits. I have enclosed a
receipt for your records since I was not able to do that for you on Friday,
February 29rh.
ff you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me a|970-479-2150.
Sincerely,
9r*'
Lynne Campbell
Office Manager
enclosure
n RECYCLED PAPEN
** **{. *ff***t***l**,t+**** **'l****** **'l*'t*** **** **** ****r**r.**r.**'i *r.*r ***** ********rt*********** *
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * t * * i. * ,1 * ,t * 't )t ,t * **** *+* + **tt**+*+* t 't { *i*** ** * * ** ** * *******'t** ** * * *
Statement Number: R080000233 Amount t $946.24 03 / 03 / 20 0 8 0 9 : 1t- AM
Payment Method: Check
COUNTER CHECK/A, PETERS
Init: Lc
Notation: 1sT BAIIK
Permit No;
Parcel, No;
S it,e Address :
Location:
This Payment:
804-0160
2103-143-0700-7
z v55 IJtl!!! ]JUWIIK
2 95 5 BEIJIJFTOWER
$946 .24
T)4)e: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT
DR VAI]-,
DRIVE
Total Fees:
Tota1 ALL Pmt.s:
Balance:
s2 ,082 .99
F946 .24
******'*'ft '+*'t*{.{.+t*****{'***{.*'t*******'t*******.***************,t r*t * {. r. {. * :3 * * * * * * * * * + * t f + * * + {. {. ,} * {. *
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code De script ion Current Pmts
PF 001_00003112300 PIJAN CHECK FEES 946 .24
Po rrt \t D t-uo-
\i-S oi L' O-o 3 8-o ooo-:EZEr:lllc o =o3F :ZFll rt -:UIOO ,t -i uztL t, :
t{j oto -gIFF -Oo-zldtrt o -tFlo:t{ l0.o o -:OFEce-
"HH5ff:F l'=(I 4 j
$-
il:!l @i H:x .-=HIJ za
N
F
I t{
ll
E e
rQ i,
E
N S -s $
| .t'ls\ts€h
l.E v,E
| .'i $'a l\'N*I r,E N lNtS
l$R i
q)
'-o nr gl'
E gt
8e5
$#s .u:r=:RS
s (I
(D
ID
e,,t\l4r
l0{
?{.l at
@ F
t0
r0
ql
s lt loz b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstanced'dfiliffiiiWffi
applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to
Lot L,$lo&L,luil
other properties in the same zone.
t
I^totwqf,&'{trict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specitied
regulationwoulddeprivetheappticantofprivilegesenjoyedbythe
owners of other properties in the same district'
12-17-7: PEBMTT APPROVAL AND EFFECT:
Approval of the variance ihatl lapse and become void if a buitding permit is not obtained and
construction not commenced and ditigently pursued toward completion within Nvo (2) years
from when the approval becomes final-
SITE ANALYSIS
Zoning:
Land Use Plan Designation:
Current Land Use:
Develooment Standard
Lot Area:
Setbacks:
Fronl:
Sides:
Rear:
Building Height:
GRFA:
Primary
EHU
Site Coverage:
Landscape Area:
Parking:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Land Use
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Two-Family Primary/Secondary District
Low Density Residential
Residential
Allowed Existinq
25', #
IS,OOO sq. tt. A$2a sq. ft. +le.eharEct
20' 14.4', +
1S'(east) 11.8' {.{6
rs'(wesi) 20.5' -e#
SO'bore Creek 62.5' '51:.5L
Leffio' of'.r,u.r
sq. rt.1 prgee'sfi{t
:.1-*sqtt sgo ud'!.827 slt,-ft.'?, - .r'. ,.Pt"#t (6;h zo'r' atiit-ii;ii-t c'*ta{' Y)
),rso'sd. fi. (25%) 1,118 sq. ft. (13"/")
[iiu a bz' ,"'tt1,..4,et+t tc1!-11{cf11)
q,z+g{q.tt. (SSv") 6,Si0 sq. ft.(75/") 5ffi€6rydi
4 spaces 2 spaces /+a€ts
42i!*e.ESfE
VII. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
Zonino
Residential Clusler zone district
Two-Family Primary/Secondary zone district
Two-Family Primary/Secondary zone district
Two-Family Primary/Secondary zone district
7
do,,.eo^6qr.i{r ot -- 1.*l 54ba/* a^':o&xNq*ft { pcrcrrS ir' tLc' R'o't^l'
Aorl ces&ic4tor ttgJ'<cl 4e €(4
{pcurlarJ vociut^u4
. t-Pcwldil bnli+iot\t -
a I
Print.ed bv Kris Widlak 09/00 4 :00pm
from: Allison Ochs
'1 0: KrlS WlclJ-aK
===NOTE:: ===:3/02/: 0:11: L3am==
Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
2955 Bellflower
According to the file, they had an old
EHU approved. f didnrt see this lot on
your )-ist of ol-d EHU's. Now they are
in for some additions and I will make
sure they update their deed
restrictlon, but I wondered if you had
any record of the old one anywhere,
It's a new owner and my fear j-s that no
deed restriction was ever recorded,
even though it was built.
oeco,or
Department of Community D evelopment
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-213I
FAX 970-479-2452
www.vailgov.com
October 12,2004
Alan and Francine Peiers
20 Old Forest Hill Road
Toronto, Ontario Canada MsP 2P7
Re: Peters Residence Final Review Submittal/Lot 6. Block 6. Vail Intermountain
Mr. Peters,
This letter is being sent to summarize the comments of staff regarding your recently
submitted revisions to your building permit application, received on September 11,2A04.
Staff has reviewed your application and found there to be several issues which need to
be resolved prior to planning signing off on the permit.
. Per a condition of Design Review Board approval please complete a Town of Vail
revocable rightof-way permit for all improvements within the right-of-way.
Please call Leonard Sandoval in the Public Works Deoartment at 970-479-2198 f
you have any questions. I copy of the permit is enclosed with this letter.. Per a condition of Design Review Board approval please complete the Type I
Employee Housing Unit Restrictive Covenant which I have enclosed with this
letter. Please contact Nina Timm at 970479-2144 l'f you have any questions on
the completion of the application.. Several of the elevations and cross-sections do not show the Design Review
Board approved clipped hip roof on the primary north/south ridge. Please see
attached photo-reductions showing the areas which need to be revised.o On the north elevation the plans submitted do not match those approved by the
Design Review Board. Please see the enclosed photocopies which depict the
change that was made. Please revise the submitted set to reflect the design
approved by the Design Review Board.
Please review these comments and if you have any questiorrs regarding this letter
please contact me at 970-479-2148. In order to keep you building permit application
moving along as quickly as possible please submit all the infonnation above.
With regards,
Senior Planner
Cc: File
ilp ^,,','",oo, n,^
o
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of C-ommunlty Development- -zs i*itf iiot*tge Road, Vail, Colorado 8165/
' - -tgi gzo.+2s12139 fax 970'479'2452
webi www,ci'Ydil.co'us
78A MULCASTERST
BARRIE, ONTARIO
CANADA L4M 3M4
Llcense: C000001580
Proiect Address: 2955 BELIFLOWER DR VAIL
2955 BELLFLOWER DRIVE
LocaUon:
Legal Desciption: Lot: 6 Bloctc 6 Subdivislon: VAIL INTERMOUNTNN
Parcet Number: 210314307007
comments: See Cqnditlons
Proiect Name: Peie/s ChaletAddition DRBNumber: DR8030430
Protect Description:
Additon to an oclsting home wtEr a lower level Employee Housing unitType r'
ParticiPants:
OWNERA|AN&FMNONEPETERSOgIzsIZOO3Phone:416488-2870
2955 EELTFI.OWER DRTVE
VNL
co 81657
Ucense:
APPuc]cNTPETERARG|ER&ASSoCIA.IESLToglzglzoo3Phone:705-735.9541
BOAR,D/STAFF ACTION
Moilon BY:
Second BY:
Votei
CondiUons:
Mele
Proper
+0
Actlon; APPROVED
Date of ApProvah O3l L7 2:oA4
Fffi; No changes to these plans may u"j114t^yffioutthe written consent of Town of
Van #n and/or ine appropriate review commiftee(s)'
Cond: 0
(P|-AN):DRBapprovaldoesnotconstitr:teapermftforbullding'Pleaseconsultwlth
Town of Vail Building d[J;;;l pti"it" conshuctton a'ctivtues'
. Cond: C0N0005332
)d;l[it;;tt,"i-"i *iu submlt a Town of vail revocable r{ght-of-way permitfre all
.- imorsvemtns within u."i,jiliilighi-of-*"y p.ior to submltUng for bullding perm-rts'
.. C-ond: CON0006333
-#-tnat tre deed restriction for the Type 1 ErnnOVgs Housing Unit be submltred to
'r staff for recording *iU, fugi" Coirii, prior io submitting for a building permiL
o
DRE Fee Paid: S2O.O0
Planner: WanenCamPbell
I EMPLOYEE HOUSING-UNIT
WHER,EAS,
certain property legally'described as:
is/are the owner(s) ['the Owne''') of
and
("the ProPertY); and
commonlY known asl
I
I
WHEREAS,theownerwishestoP|ace.certainrestlictions_onthe.us;.ofgunitorapaRlTent|ocated
on the property tor tne uenJiit;i'#-##;; trre rown otvail, colorado ("the Town"',)
NoW,THEREFORE,theownerdoeshereby-impose,establish.acknowledge,and<leclareforthe
benefit of alt persons who m?lv n"r"in"tt"r purct ase, oi i5"o, ot hold tire subject land the following
restnctions, covenants, ""i;il;ft;;;;Liriiiwr,icrr.iir|ii"
J.J*"J to run-w'rih the land and inure to the
benefit and be bonding "pJtitiSii#ii'it" l*p"av" grantees' successors' and assisns'
1. The ErnPlovee Hor'rsing Unit (EHU..)acontu'n'ng F-[1 -':l"^":'f""t'is herebyrestricted as a
Tvoe I EHIJ which must comply wrth ;ll ffi ffi"rffi;fi chapter 13, Trtle 12 of the Town
Go<te of Vail as amended'
2'TheTypeIEHUshallnotbesubdividedotdividedintoanyformofiimeshares.interval
ownerlhiP, or Factional fee'
3.TheTypelEHUsha||beleasedtoandoccupiedbytenants.whoarefult-timeemployeeswho
work in =JsiJ';"ffi;.T;;Tyt" I Eilir ;;li;;i ni, ieaseiror a period less than thirtv^(3o)
consecutlvedays'Forthepu'po""".Jtniiparagraptr'afull-timeemployeeisonewno
works an averase of a minimum "l t#i'605 h;i"!i"n y:llt-:n a veai round basis' The
owner of the Type I EHU snatt renr-rne rln'i a't a monurry.relltaljate c;nsistent with or lower
thari those market tates p,"u","n, ,ol="i;iil69ry"i i'' th". Town. The Type I EHU shal|
beconunuouslyrentedandsha||^ot.'u'"in'i""antforaperiodtoexceedfive(5)
consecutive months'
4'occupanoyoftheTypeIEHUshallbelimitedtoamaximumofhtuopersonsperbedroom.
5.|ftheTypeIEHUisGonstructedWithoutadedicatedq?f.e-u::,Pini'umofseventy-five(75)
squareteetofslomgeareas-:qdj$;;;ormalclosEtspaceisrequiredfortheexclusive
use of th;;;;P;nG of the TYPe I EHU"
6.TheTypelEHUshalthaveitsown.enuance.There.shallbenolnterioraccessfromany
eHu to anvTw-eriiii'i'ijiti" *n''"h it may be atbached'
T.TheTypetEHUmustcontainakitchenorkitchenetteandabathrgom.
8. The Type I EHU may be--sgld'.trflIfened' or conveyed separately from the single family or
twofamilydwellingon|yifitistobeilliiuvtn"ownerofthe.T.lpeIEHUasapermanent
residence' For tne PurPosq of-thq p"l:"gdpi't p9n319$ 't-"'i'ience
shall mean the home
or prace in *r,]triE i=;i"bitation iJfi]x;; ;;',to *hi"h one, whenever he or she is absent
nas a p..="ni.intention of retumi,,s u#i"-J"p"rt!Jre orabsen.ce therefrom' reggrdless of the
duration of absence. tn ae*rminins-Jhat is a permanent residence. the Town staff shall take
the fol|owing circumstances ,.|",,n; il'fi;.oil,ffi qf tq; resic|ence into accounL business
pursuits,eriptoyment,income'*'t*li""io"ncetorincomeorothertaxpurposes'age'
maritat sEtus, residence or parent"i!'pbu's-el"no "rtiro;n
if any' location of personal and real
prop"r.,r,5ii t-oio*eni"re 'r'gistrii#l-iilj'"' i3tt i:ti::'E t the transfdr of creed for the
rvpeIEh-U.;;-prospecli,lepircnasii.sr'attsuimitan.applicationobrainedffomthe cornru"iii'#=uil,;ffi;i'b-";;'ri;ffi;tlo'ini c"i*unftv bevelooment Department
'clocumentingthattheprospective.pui.n"=",.""t.thecriteriasetforthhereingndsha||
incl"d";;;'fr;;;i;;fli';ilsth;therstshemeeFthesecriteris'
I
i
i
Type t RoYisBd APrit 18. 2000
Pago 1 ofz
L No later than February 1 of each year' the owner of the Type I EHU shall submit two (2)
copies of a .*orn "fiii"uil;;-;'i"'^ !b;= outainea trom ine communityDevelopment
Ddoartment, to the community Developme^nt oli'"rit""i""ttinq f9+! eividence establishing
that the employee housing unit has.been t{"d ;;;;;t-oicufreo throughdut the year' the
renul rate. the employer, and that the ten""t *;t" t"=ioE *itt'in ttt" empoyee housing unit is
a fult-timeLmployee in Eagle County'
10. The Tvpe t EHU shalt!loP"'+d gllgl:?in"d in accordance with Chapter 13''lltle 12 of
the Town cooe ot vait. Fa'iture to go so ma.y.iJult'in enforceme-nt proceedings in a court qf
comperenr junsotiil;iii"";;ta-"*" *itn cn"pGis, Titt. r2 of o.'eTown Gode of Vail-
1 1. The conditions, restrictions' stipulations' and'agteements contained herein shall not be
waived, "u"ncon"i'i
i"r-mftiJ, ;;*dnaea.TxGi uy the writen consent of both the Town
of Vaif ino the ownlr of the Properly'
TOWN OFVAII- a Colorado municipal corporation
B),:
Town Manager
STATEOF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
)) ss-
t
The foregoing inslrumentwas acknowleclged before me this-day of 20--
Town Manager'
by
Notary Public:
My commission oqlres:
qfi
PropertY owner
STATE OF )) ss.
I )COUNTY OF
The foregoing Instrument was acknowledgecl b'efore me this
-day
of 20-
PropertY Owner
by
Notary Public:
My commission exPires:
Type I Revised APIiI 14,2000
and
Page 2 ol 2
,,*,mf, '^i-T?tJ',?t[Fs$fr8#iJ$hiffu 'of,li8l-o*
WAY
TYPES OF IMPROVEMENTS
Fence
Wall
LandscaPing
Other
O![}IER OF PROPERTY
r
(ewnsr ryPE)
ADDRESS
LEGALDESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY-TO BE SERVED:
bi':-- B ioCr ---= s-u BD lvl s I ol:'-
i'iri.*=-t"il":tij"n-""*otiononseparatesheet)'
Corner lot
-_-
lnside lot
DETAILEDDESCRIPTIoNoFSTRUCTuREoRITEM(s)lNToR|GHT-oF-WAY:
Does structure PresentlY exist?
il;Hffi ;i; i; ;.;ili"
" ""1"9 :t-::::l'1,3t'll Ftopos.O date for commencement of c.on$ru"t'"" ';;; ;O;;" 'tdicated, applicant
ln consideration of tne'issuance of a revocable permit for the structt
agrees as follows:
l.Thatthestructurehereinauthorizedonarevocablepermitbasis'isrestictedexclusivelytothelandabove
descrlbed'
?-ThattheFermitislimitedspeciflcatlytothetypeofstructuredescribedinthisapplication'
3. rhar the appricant shar notirv rrre Proiect Plil1""1::l*::l:#:$ l""f=."ffi:f'':t}"il f.t{ ;;'$:f "'
aoent twenty-four hours in advarce ol ne
i.l;;u;" ftY be macle bY the Town'
aTheapplicantagreestoindemnifyif,IlgharmlessineToYnoJ.V."]r,itsoff|cers,employees.andagents
"siinir"rr ri"oniivllLi'i= "no
J.inano=oti#5t*J:'=Tl!:i;'.'m:;l;:H'll"'":'**U;i::"'
.ili." uGi"g fro-rn nodity injury' personat t
other toss of any Kind wtiarsoever, wni.n-u"i'"*"iui'oi"ri* qSryguni"iL"lt"it"clwith applicants
activities p,rr=uiniio this permit". if sy"Ijl,,d, io-"=l oi Att"g-" G .T-"""i i" *hole or in p1t'lvi'o'i= claimed
to i" ..ur*o i"'*'nriJri i'n-nun nv, t1"-::iTll,#:rt:"xk ilfiilfifl"#tF;llit4ftil.\t"[:faurt of the applicant' his conuactor o'"uo.r.
The appltcant aSt""l-(:li':*1F;!tl"il'SiElre or ti,"
;ldli:t,'l*::?F:H:qllil-i:?ilffI =""iiri'it'''ritv'
d111:::ld"'ands at the sore expen
appticant, The appticanr also agrees to u",i|- "ii;-pittes
retating mJ[il''intr'oing court costs and
t?'iii'lxll[1 *" oRNls\F ERMITs\Rev cable Ro w P ermit'doc
attorneysfees,whetherornotanysuchfiability,claims,ordemandsallegedareEroundless'falsE'or fraudulonloslapolicyo|po|iciesofinluEncesufficienttoensure
Appricanr asres *.p1"*T"""linT="IHl""iHr$illo?;;;;o uj ure appricanTpuisuant to this
aiiinstatt liabilitY claims' o
fftrt iI f,;;; asree tr retease me r9w1 {_v;jr,-its
officers, asen* and-Bmplovees from anv and all
-
lsTle;Jl1$i'"?rr'"';;lffi ild?E't"'L':'*vi,mf y+iis;us-++*:l1"+ffi Lq'i;1i''
H[.|?rui"igggs,:""t4:l;HHH'$T':"a'sc'vr
IffiT:-H$,ft :li:fi:lg$:tiFll'n"'#:T["f'5:l$ffi fr itr-l-l.'"i:]:H##tglTi#F?
t.ifrrni=",0,01,-"a':p-"i;,:[,il=ilJjXih*le"l*;']HJ..l'H:"#:lH
use by the Pr.rbliq of t may EE rt,vurElr s! '"' '"r'- '-'
]fi3;*:j$ffillg1,"sif;"xt"lii"T3Flifi'l??;ff'""*'ent'
obs'truction' orEtructulewrthinten davs
Thattheapp|icantagreestomaintainany|andscapingassociatedwithheencroachmentontneright-ot+ay.
H*,t':?il?l:T:""f rulnHI"T:l+,TiH*#f ffi :::i:iff ud-it{i;:#ji:tr"H*lr"
;-rJpl*ft;-d;oltl"[rn" iottt or removal in the 88ml
ThattheaPp[canthasreadandundersbandsa|toftheterflEandconditiqnssetforthinthisapp|icauon.
fie Revocabre Righr-of.way Ferm:it;Fl"rfJh.+i#J;OrOuT,r*r fee pavs for Eaqle Gountv Glerlt and
Recorder recording' Mal
7,
8.
o
10.
11.Special conditions:
t i
ilT*m:ltfi :fl",31[?1"'"=,
Date
Date
APPROVED:
Project Planner
Dejrjffi'Gf Publicworlcs
,T+ffi:-ilytTo'v{FoRMs\PEBMlrSrRevsableRoW?ennk'doc
il
i1
I
\I
ll ll
I
I
-i-
-'S)4cD
'=%e ,'.\-6
e
5
ri 3
-{
,l il
t n E
\"t
\l-l
$
6 i
IA
IH 'ul
t:
t'
t\1-\s lss l6
! -'!s'\!t ls i*i€A-l_+>JY lX l-
3re\.9 ::' \ -\-2'()\, +5 \-\nl
irl
IrJ
;6
le
T \IF \\ iF v \ ll-9\ rF \\ IE
tu^ i t[t l ,F r\ iE
\\ i s.'il\
|
b\l
Frl Yr
=i\
I\
s
tl f
v U llt
YP
=ul =v <u IZL
sg
I-
{E fi lY.iiF
Sci :3
'.d I.\: $\5. U \
i ttf
,-Z v
s s.-{t -1t
R q
ro r
I
I t/
a q
.\t o N-SST
*"q _\e JA
\ -\,:t-
."_5 €<
I
\)
-rr- t
\_J s-s-
<-sJ. d
<,-
/ l*==-/iff
v
\rr u)j._-_____
v\ qo <cZ 3-a \)&--<
\ -->.-
tl g
ul v.
p1$ t g*
S;Hfi q PK
iE =oH f E*You? u- oY
ilb.*ia { 60
3u*fs { sH
-"{ 1Hb H qE
i[$ix d I:)Pfis o b lfi
di .nUlJ
;b8
trb s I YroO dB+"
ao$Q d:6s SFit*-
$d f;i
z oH tr
E;" 2 pq6
^0 tt
$mtr 8As X:.\^
IFFE fu50
^r*>z
t\gi
q1
U\
z\P\tul 0-r Ar ,g\
tul Ol
t|\0-\q\-R\
"{\
ol
ti
b\
?r
-l I
I
\
I
\
o rrl ,, ,"8{$nl r
6 -n H{'fr pg rgi#s frt* EF i$::: !$kg l[ir.! ;EdE Eu i'rr
__ji--
o q
6
lll g
E
b
{L o
Itl
-l
*
IL
o z
z
!-
,,,,
!l
'/f
fi0
I
"'f,
I "?/l z-,zz
o
I
tl
I
I
E
X !J
!uo zo iil
v)l -\d. I S< l Fts i --:Ql q--) q-*.- s-
icO
$X Yt
q\ L-gl ^s)r__--<, \4L
l-
V-< o,
\--
y.E utl
F (f)O { lll IO
ul *,2
l\
U
rl I -Y ul Ii I Bti li $s----l-'e\ i tr"\
I t\ l,\t | -fu\ I :q\ | r u\ I I L\ I ttl \d\l s"\
I
e\ I i., I I .'.i
I -; b\l
FSFI ?\
ilEfi-i\
freEl r\se;l I i $qQl I I H$gll\
- -J
$l .\I
'ra I
rtl 2
E t
b,
*8 ftr ,t rl
"l .L
trrt,, @
"tmil
-lll- \
"
llll ffit
NIUJIII A __----\-q %"
:il
rO
.q
ro
FO J lll
+d 0-z (f)-r <o
\?.s,
\€_a.> -\s
3 \-s i1&Z<
E v F
A
s
U (|)
IL
e
E
u.
.f
E
v-
rl
$
6
o
j t!
o
l,-
F rt
!I
dr
ol
il z'
rtl (t) |
xl
o q
6 -
lu rj
E.
j o
x
uI
L o
6\H\\-\F \qt \
ffinstitY DeYelopment
75'South Fmnmge Road
TalI, Colorado 81657
970-179-2138
FIK 970-479-2152
www.vdlgov.com
August 1,2004
Peter Archer and Assodatss
c/o Peter Archer
78A Mulcaster Street
iiiielo-tttalo Canada L4M 3M4
Re:PetsrsFesidenceFina|ReviawSubmltEl/Lot6,Block8,Va|||ntermounta|n
Mr. Arclrer'
Thls|ettgr|sbaingeenttosummar|zethe..commentgofstaffrssad|nsyourr€cgrfiy
submlrred buitding permit;ffil[1;;:- sGrr-nas revteweo your applicatlon and bund
there lo be several iseuss ffiich need to Ue resotveO prforto ptannilig eigning off on the
permit.
. Per a condrtion or Desisn Reu.ew Boad 'iHBts{,:ifi:"t";fiil,f if,-"-'-E.tidr"iXl - Ltuo"iute rtgtt'ot-way permil br all.
please cau rconlra' iinfiJvar-in r," pudil'w;k; oipartm$!.{ s7o-ue-ztss it
you have al,v q,jl'JiJtr-J.-iiipi ortnu p"rmit is enctoied wlth thls letter.
. Per a conOttton iiE*ign-Ri't'i"w eoad apProval Plgqse complete the Type I
Emptoyee nour.,ib-riiir'R;lirilh;". E},;ilrir nittlct I have er;closod wlth thls
fener. please #"tJ'itil;-ffiii xszgifg'zlrl4 if vou have anv questions on
itre completton of the apP]lca!ioj'!'
rSheetA.4depict|ngtheRoofPlanshowEtvrc-eky.||gtrt"!199ytobe|nsta|led.
Thls detailwas noi revlewed or-approued oy ngbryion Tfl-9Y Board- Please
submtr a Onang;'; AdilaTians -appiicailon toi review.and apprcval or
remo\tehisdetailfromyourPlalJs:.rr.tiliJOa"nbretaineddsassrevlseyour
iirnn invarion to Oep'a U'e sky'{lght windows'
. o,r rhe north d#d; i.{A;t ;"bTttt"d do not matctr those approved by the
Destgn nevnwtlat,
-F=t:lrr_:":.tne encloseo photocopies which depid the
change m"t nalmroe._Ptease rcvisd
','e "uUmfu.O
s€t to reflEc't the des'ign
dpd"€i bythe Design Review Boato'
p6aso revleur these. commg1e-.qld {-v-ogi"u" arry questio'1l *r#lf
"If-"iff;olease contact me a 67o'-dzB-2148' tn-oder to kee-p vou bulldlng t
ffi;ils;;E; qurcr.V ,i" pcil"rnri pr"""e submlt all the inlormation above'
-ffi'"4il1
bc: File $r.crr"-orlr
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Crmmunity Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel r 970.479.2139 faxt 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail,co,us
Project Name: Peter's Chalet Addition DRB Number: DRB030430
Project Description:
Additon to an existing home with a lower level Employee Housing Unit Type I.
Pafticipants:
OWNER ALAN & FMNCINE PETERS 09129/2003 Phone: 415-488-2870
2955 BELLFLOWER DRIVE
VAIL
co 816s7
License:
APPUCANT PETER ARCHER & ASSOCIATES LT09/29l2003 Phone: 705-735-9544
78A MULCASTER ST
BARRIE, ONTARIO
CANADA L4M 3M4
License: C000001580
Project Address: 2955 BELLFLOWER DR VAIL location:
2955 BELLFLOWER DRIVE
Legal Description: Lot:6 Block 6 Subdivision: VAILINTERMOUNTAIN
Parcel Number: 2703L4307007
Comments: See Conditions
BOARD/STAFF ACIION
Motion By: Viele Action: APPROVED
Second By: Proper
Vote: 4-0 Dateof Apprcvalz 03ll7POA4
Conditions:
Condl B
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond:0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: CON0006332
That the applicant will submit a Town of Vail revocable right-of-way permit foe all
improvemtns within the public right-of-way prior to submitting for building permits.
Cond: CON0006333
That the deed restriction for the Type I Employess Housing Unit be submitted to
staff for recording with Eagle County prior to submitting for a building permit.
' Ptanner: Wurr"n Cur*t o*" r""?? $2o.oo
TYP E I EM PLoY EE H-otIl l! g-UNlr
I
WHEREAS,
certain Property legelly'rlescribed as:
is/are the ouuner(s) f'the Own€i') of
and
fthe ProPertf'); and
commonlY known as:
WHEREAS,theownerwishesbP|lgTHlrest'idions-onthe.us.e.$gunitorapartment|ocatgd
on the property ror me Uen#t-oi riie Wn,ir anO trE Town ot Vail. Colorado ('thc Town"')
NOW, THEREFORE. tre oyn:t99:llgretyimp6se', estag[8]' a{p{edoe' and dedareforthe
benefit of a' pe*ions who ml!-nerenaner nytcfrase,,or'i5""",'or hold hi subJect land th. follofling
resrrictrons, qovenants, "nd'A;;r6;;;"ri5i",tti"rt.irtJdEGil;
to runy{r-tfe tend and inure to thE
benefit and be bonding "ponT"
ffi,il'6rBspecfive g;nt".s' successonst and assigns'
1. The Employee Housing. Unit (EHU)' cont"'ntng F-fl-'11u-"13lu"g is herebv-restricted as a
Tvoe I EHdwhioh mustcomplywith iiil;;ri"li!ffiicttaPEr 13,Trtle 12 of theTown
G'dde of Vall aE amended'
2.TheTypelEHUshal|notbesubdividedordivided|nhanyfomofhmeshares.lntarva|
o,rn"itriP, or lractonal fue'
3.TheTypeIEHUsha||be|easedtggl'doccup|edbytonants'whoarefulFtimeemfloyeeswtto
work in Eesle county. The Type I Etii, sf,;iiil 6l relieo tot a oerlod less than thitty (30)
consecutive motttts'
4'occupancyoftlteTypeIEHUshgt|bs|imibdbamaximumofbuopersonsperbedroom.5 5;H,:ffiJ":iHlilTl#ffi.ff.,,T"1Hif"",*:i$'j.!"'I$ii$"[:i;3gl;ff5'[u'
use of $;;;;i;Gof herYPe I EHU''
6.ThaTypelEHUshallhaveiBorrvnentrance.Therg'shaltbenolntErioraccBsgfrcmany
eHu to a'nv"tir'vlilili i'ilni" tnlcn fi m41 be attactred'
7. Tha Type I EHU must contain a kit*ren or lfichenete and a bathroom'
s. rhe ryp.e r EHU, may be -,ee,Erfsd'rTH#* ffiwffi ${if-fi$5i pf*+X'S:*+i;;*f*rmq*ru:+9frs;Hili"htgffiH:"
[:#sil."gr$ng*ll*:'m;'3^T'"#tr"fi i'Hiruiil-iiil'"tansharrtakc
fte frllowing ctrcumsbnces retslldil'ffi4;ffi'otitt" iJloen"e into accounL busincss
pur$its, ctipbyment, incomesorr6-s, i5"loin""lo' inco'me or other ta,( PurPgseg' agg'
mariElsbtus, restdence of par"nol"'dorii-i;;-qtq*n if eny, tocation oi personal end real
p,"p",.v'|'g.it 'i-tii ,"hi'1..*g'of;h#: r[inv igo} oE,- pnio' io u'" mns|er of dsed tor thc
Effi JFI;g5tr#:f *:H#*a[**nml.img:n'FT'lfffi-,,
documentins ulat the p-.pot* p',jtln;lit"iG tne iric.ria sdt furth h€rlin ent' shall
includE en dffidavit afirmtng thd her or Ehe meets glese cdtaria'
Tlp. r Borrisld APrll lE. 20(n
Pq. I ofz
g.NolaterthanFebruarylofgachyear,theolrneroftheTypelEHUsha|lsubmittwo(2)
copies of a "*o'n
#,i"nil;;; f,;^ tb u. out"-rn"i r'im ii'e com.munity Development
Deparrrnent to tn" bii'ii"nitv o*"ropt"nt rili"titlini""tting forth dvidence establbhins
that bc employee nousing u{ n1,9egn_r5194"5i'Jii',iii-o"iiiplqd throuehdut the vear' the
renral fEre, rre empbyer,Lnd rhet the Ena"t;il;liffi itiitif, ni
"tpioyee
houslng unit is
a-iuilti'm" bmpbyee In Eagle county'
10',I,[",HHl"u j,\il1i",:ti',tr"'fl!ff Ii"*1iJilX??FTi[F&"jfJJft l&l*t
cornpetenr juristto,i#;LnJi" "-"*mance
witnEriliitii,?,u-d ii "i
tte Town-Code of Vail-
1 1. The conclitlono, rcstrictions' stitgul{iglsf-lllasre€ments contained herein shall not be
wa.rved. ab€ndoned, terminapd, o, "a"no*'"1i'pi'uiir't"
urdu"n consent of bout fte Toun
or-Vatiino ttre Ovner of tre Property'
TOWN OF VAlt- a Golorado municipal corpotation
Br =, -
Town Menager
STATEOF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
The fotegoing instrumsntwas acknodedged before me this
-day
sf
Town l\llsnager'
Netary Publlc:
Mycommlssion aqlree;
)) $e.
)
by
The forcgoing Instlment wes acknolflledgecl befar' me thiE
-dsy
of
20-
and ,
ProPetV Ottrter
zo--
BF
STATEOF I ) rs.
)COUNTY OF
by
Notary Publc
My commiesion eu<Pircs:
Typ€ | Revistd APrll 1E. Z00o
and
Pege 2 of z
o
TOWN OF VAIL
AppLlcATloN FoR ievocneLE PERMIT To EREcr oR
filrr.rrerir rrtapnovirvtenrs oN A PuBLlc RIGHT-of-
WAY
OWI{ER OF PROPERTC
CANNOT BE REDUGED ,ErEr TYPES OF IMPROVEMENTS
Fence
Wall
LandscaPing
Other
ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTIoN oF PRoPFTIILo BE SERVED:
ib;':- t ubCr ---. :! I 9Yf PLr
hiri.A"o, ;ti';E#pilon on separate sheet)'
Corner lot lnside lot
DETA|LEDDESCRIPTIoNoFSTRUCTuREoRITEM(s)lNToRIGHT.oF.WAY:
Does structure PresentlY exist? = ' ' '
prooosed date for romti "nt"m6-of
constr-udon piicant
In consideration of tne'iss-uaice?i revocable permitforthe strucn
agrees as follows:
l.Thetthestuctlreherginauthottzedonsrevoceblepermitbasisisre€iltctgdexclusive|ytothelandabove
descflbed.
2.Thatthepcrmlt|slimitedspeciflca|lytoslevpeofstructtl]edescfibedinthisapplication'
3.Thattheapplic€ntsha||notifyhefuiect-FtannerendPubllcWorksD.paftment,ortheirdulyautrodze'd
agent twentrroil;ilil,;; ;d;;Ice df ['tc;;;;;-*m*int"t"ntof construction' in orderthatproper
lniPeition miY be mede bY the Town'
a rhe app*cantasre.s u Indemnify andjrgl-d balilessg",r-*11-TL"i:H"#fi:'fil5'ffiAi'T'i'ffi'j1"4
i'""#iffilt'ffirt""ffi "'t#ls*;ll"''m"*:*ryifr:iiidl#?"#i#'"1'"$lsft s: T'
:n#ffir-iqiTl"',H,[,T-#,"Jgsli'":l'l'' #:fu"{i:t-ii;,**mr til J"uiio in wnore or rn part bv, the aci -.---i bi
"nv "!q":r.::gii"*a*:r,f::i:":Iij,LT,.:1,, ro feunortneEPpH,[|ff fr ffi"ffi ffi il'|;,;';;fi t'a-ntaernest
apptican( ni" ci-ntiiioro1[:"":H.,lfl.u
",,ch 'abiriu,
craims. orie;L-nJiai-ittJsoe.expcnse of the
iilula" d"cn* tur and detund again1's
appficanr, rncipirtant elso asrces to u"Iti"n:-i?iilli
-^lEirns nJtdi-i''ili"r"oins court costs and
tffittffi1*"oRMs\PERMlTS\Revcable RoW Permit'doc
5.
attomEyg|ees.wha$erofnotEnys'Jctr{l8bw,c|ahrc,ordemanc|sgl|rgedareground|esc,iE|s..or freuilultnl pd' E Poliey or Pqlicies of lruurance sulficient to snsuG
133ilf,T,,"ntS.iPr"",ffiTf.ili.ff5"?'li""l5o1illt:n;al5u'&r
uv oe rppri#ilpursu.ntto this
61-"6igdffi**ffit*rom**nmw*-l*s+Y
m,mfrt}ff-Wgimn
rrut thr +t*l{"5sffi"?HH"3Tilffi $"J[o**tent"
oEsFudion' or stvstu]e wlthin En dav
aftBr receNing notic€ or Brl Ievwwerut':
That tle app$cant agre$ to maintaln any landrcaphs llsodacd wffii the cnc
rhath rhe ivcntsaiit Fmova of $e ooerss-chmmt' obstsuction'-or:ry*gfiltt"Tl$F$I$?*t$"
#l,"#:"Iru,iliH"ffi sl#iFtrlaili::n:il*131""S,?xl!il1'%ffiu;i'"a'd
ThatthsaPPilcemhacleadandunderstandsa|tofthrterngan6condifionssctffihhtlicapp|rcadon.
H".ffSg:1;filfrTfiHlti.Hff5rrLT#f,t"T'fl"
he Pavr br Eagre Gounry Grerk and
8.
7,
8.
9.
10.
11.Special conditions:
Date , H#il"'i*""r
ffis"ft[?t"'or
Date
!
t APPROVED:
Prolect Phnner
@works
tTiHiffi**o$Ylsvmlvrns\8svcilblc RoW Pcroit'tloc
r s-t
€ d=.;l e --i_-a -,-l g L-e e 6
E F
Ii 7
z {
't
-3
N
6 s |-
d
E z tl.
6
fi
E
E
g
a sl
E
F
$
o
3
$
g
a sl
E
E
g
+
d
9 6l
G
$
sl
$l
fri
HI
t\l b
F
JUU-28-2004(MO{) l4:ffi pErbAmHER & ASSoCTATES GA$Sr 735 s541 P.W2/611
TOWN OF VAIL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
TNFORMATION MUSI BE COIVTPLSTB gR THE APPLTCATION WILI, BF, RE gCTED
azg
contadthe EagtecountyA.ssessorc offiaat9t0-s2&8o40forParcet# PF*I0O - O'
Parcel 11 2 1. 03 1 4 307 007
>Date: June 2{t . 2OO4
JobNqnq JobAddr€ss: 29J5 Eellf]'ouer DJ..l
p€rmit# 6otl '9lco
Vail r CO
Mcctraniol ( ) Othcr ( )Building 8c )Plurnbing ( )Elecfical ( )
OwncrsNamc: ALan & Franclne ,/AddFss: eO o14 EolFst::qll Phonc#l-4-1-LL-4.ILE:2870
Toronto, 0N MsF 2P7
Arditesf PBte' Afch€' +-,Assgc Addr$s:78A Mulcaster Strget Phone#IZ9JL-735i1544
Barrie' oN L4M 3M4
Desc,ripdon of Job: alberat,{ on and additian, to petors Chalet -
LegnlDescripion: Lst*g_ Block;q- Filing Subdivision Vail Internountaln
. Peters DeveloPmont
Work Olss: New ( )Altcratiorr (j Additional (x)Rcpair ( )olta ( )
Nurnber of Durellin g Unis :__l__Nurnber of Aocommodstjon Uniu:---J--
NumbcrondlpeofFireplaoesl OasApplinnces q - .. Gaslogs Wood/Pcllet
VALUATONq
ELECTRICAL: $
MECHAMCAL$
CONTRACTOR INFORIIIATION
Addrcss: 20 01d Foresb.,lllll Read, Torontor oN
ltSP 2P1
RECEIVED
DI]ILDING:
PLUMBING
$l:5,_0_0-0-_0!-_
$
$
c
OTHERT
TOTAL
Gsncnrl Conrrcsor: Alan Poters
Tou$ of Vail REgistration No.Phonc #
Electricel Conuactor. Addros.s:
Towrr of Vail Re6istration No.Phono #
P|tlnblnu Contrrctnr:Addrcss:
Phonc #
Mcchanlqll Conflactor:Addrcss:
Phone #
FOR OFFICE USE
T/PE GROUF SO. FT. ..VALUATION BUILDING:
SIGNATURE:
ZONING:
SIGNATUREI
I0I4{\IM
Proiect Name: Peters Residence Variance
Proiect Description:
O1
Planning and Environmental Commission
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, @lorado 81657
tel: 97 0.479.2139 faxi 97 0.479.2452
web: wwuci.vail,co.us
PEC Number: PEC030075
Variance request to allow for the encroachment of an addition into required setbacks. A varaince
to allow for the location of parking within the public right-of-way.
Pafticipants:
OWNER AI-AN & FMNCXNE PETERS 10/2812003 Phone: 416-488-2870
2955 BELLFLOWER DRIVE
VAIL
co 81557
License:
APPUCANT AI-AN & FMNCINE PETERS LOl2Bl2003 Phone: 416-488-2870
2955 BELLFLOWER DRIVE
VAIL
co 81657
License:
Project Address: 2955 BELLFLOWER DR VAIL Locat
2955 BELLFLOWER DRIVE
Legal Description: Lot: 6 Block: 6 Subdivision: VAIL INTERMOUNTAIN
Parcel Number: 210314307007
Comments: See Conditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
Conditionsr
Chas Bernhardt
Doug Cahill
6-0
Action: APPROVED
Date of Approvalz LL12412003
C.ond: 8
(PLAN); No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: CON0005313
That prior to final design review approval, the applicant provides a landscape plan
which includes provisions to adequately buffer the surface parking area from
adjacent propefties.
Cond: CON0006314
That the applicant submits a revocable right-of-way permit to Public Works for all
improvements located within the drainage easement and right-of-way prior to issuance
of the building permit.
Cond: CON0006315
3O
That the.otiln",, submit a foundation ,rorou"r"nfHoon certificate (ILC)
upon completion of the installation of the foundation walls and a framing ILC prior
to a framing inspection for review and approval by staff in order to veriff
compliance with the approved variances,
Planner: Warren Campbell PEC Fee Paid: $500.00
ao oo
ZONE CHECK
Ta+t
Addrcss
Osncr
Architcct
Sctbacks
WLr*l^(\t^)"^r)
Landscaping
Pbonc
Phonc
Zonc district
Lotsizc I
Total GRFA
Proposcd usc
Existinc . proooscd
+
. &Tgq = )o1t*b44
or(9
Front
Sidcs
Rcar
20'
.t5,
t5'
ycs.-.-X- No
Ycs-X- No
3) Wcrlands
a) Snorv Avalanchc
b) Roclfall
c) Dcbris Florv
I rnclos.a
lo Ior ll sa
'.-,,,tn'*cntoQl$'}r.)sr@ 283.1 W+- = lWh At &1(,6-*o500**'@:J1]1 bA1 *-=E eq 1fl'I + 6i5=42icrcdirptus2i0addition
Docsrrrisrcqucstinvorvca250Arrdirion? \e; {" ?.*.yrr,,t ?SO$a 4/A l?t-'ar;^
Horv much of tlc allo\vcd 2j0 Add.ition is uscd Mth ttisr.qu.rtl , ? ? 6 R _
ci!!w#/,aasTl
Uar;onrt
illeL/n
. ivlinimum
Rctaining Wall Hcig.h6
ParLing
Garegc Crcdit
Drivovay
Conrplics wirh TOV Liglring Ordinancc
Arc finishcd gradcs lcss than 2:l (50%)
Enrironnr cntal,&lazards
Prcvious conditions of approval (chcck propcrty filc);
ls thc propcrfy non-conforming? Dcscribc:
^ 3't 6'Pr:rvt1'I
nq"ir.a Zlirr-'f ,l
(3oo)(dool6(r2oo) ^ 2514
PcrmitrcdSlopc b % proposcdStop" 6 y.
4) Watcr Course Sctback (30)
5) Ccologic Hazards
tu)tk
oo
ssrtcvc4I
rferols
^iouS
(cpe.6 pue.ssrcre) {e,nr,ruq t,.'1
snrP"U Surcmll : ;"?'"-:' "'' ,:'
ta
1t ,t.ritrr: "llr . r
%o. I Ii
"i':t"'-
'-
. "r',on"uir.r r",,. c8eJsD/ruD{lud
. -t\..i,,
. r . .rr . . sirurl
? r'. ' _ l t"r , -.
,,:.,, ,.;) . .'sJpr115u1u;e1cg
^
^,;)r,", I 'r"'J"-1.'i
,-.i!U-.:f r .
o.onpun) gidrn :'1.
. "{
'1i."r', .cdoJglapergcll5
uorlrcuuoc a6seO
\,jr ' ) ^f sc;uocpgrqcaq
(1) sErnq_rca67sc,ru3
f:[_i r l, .',, -tf ; .'*
a-' '!,, 1 ! r (-..,"1 'f ' r1i-'t.'ri',
I
NV?dAIIS D
,'rA;ii; I Ll
I
scJdurs pp:;eur Bulpllng ! ' . ..i -'
!l q*{siDqcd $.."',,.\-
ru:oJ uor:ecguaa Arlun 4, ,. ,-
(e * V) uodrrp jrlr
t?
p,ro:ddt' opu{j
snoaNvtil5iu^i,
. '..
. .., ' . reSuc,roJ.iib;, ;-:-- 'l' -
'iiin ;;' +,-,r.,-; .J:,
:.f$qrEglrs
sJuauqf,eolsuS
tq?ga11 fuaipng
cisrs
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
PUBLIC MEETING
Monday, November 24, 2003
PROJECT ORIENTATION / - Community Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME 12:00 pm
:MEMBERS PRESENT
John Schofield
Erickson Shirley
Rollie Kjesbo
Doug Cahill
Chas Bernhardt
Gary Hartman
Site Visits:
1. Peters Residence -
Driver: George
MEMBERS ABSENT
George Lamb
2955 Bellflower Drive
NOTE: lf the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p,m., the board may br'eak for dinner.from 6:00 -
6:30om
Public Hearinq - Town Gouncil Chambers 2:00 pm
1 . A iequest for a major subdivision, pursuant to Chapter 13-3, Major Subdivision, Vail Town
Code, to allow:for the platting of Lots 'l and 2, Lodge Subdivision, located at 164 Gore
CreekDrive/Lots A, B, & C, Block 5C, VailVillage 1st Filing, and setting forth details in regard
thereto.
Applicant: Lodge Tower South Condominium Association, represented by Stan Cope
Planner: George Ruther
MOTION: Gary Hartman SECOND: Doug Gahill
TABLED TO DECEMBER 8,2OO3
2. A request for variances from Section 12-60-6 (Setbacks) and Title 1'4 (Development
Standards- locating required parking in the Right-of-Way), Vail Town Code, to allow for a
residential addition and remodel located at 2955 Bellflower Drive (Peters Chalet)/ Lot 6,
Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicanl: Alan and Francine Peters, represented by Peter Archer & Associates Planner: Warren Campbell
MOTION: Chas Bernhardt SECOND: Doug Cahill
APPROVED WITH 3 CONDITIONS
1. That prior to linal design review approval, the applicant provldes a
landscape plan which includes provisions to adequately buffer the surface
parking area from adjacent properties.
VOTE:6-0
VOTE:6-0
2. That the applicant submits a revocable rlght-of-way permit to Public Works
for all improvements located within the drainage easement and right-of-
way prior to issuance of the building permit.
3. That the applicant shall submit a toundation lmprovement Location
Certificate (lLC) upon completion of the installation of the foundation walls
and a framing ILC prior to a framing inspection for review and approval by
staff in order lo verity compllance with the approved variances.
3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for proposed texl amendments to
Section 12-7H-5, Conditional Uses; Generally (on all levels of a building or outside a
building), VailTown Code, to allow single{amily residentialdwellings and two{amily
residential dwellings as conditional uses in the Lionshead Mixed Us+-1 District; a request for
a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7H-5, Conditional Uses; Generally (on all
levels of a building or outside a building), Vail Town Code, and a request for a major exterior
afteration, pursuant to Section 12-7H-7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town
Code, to allow for the construction of twelve new single-family and twoJamily residential
dwelling units; and a request for a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7H-5,
Condilional Uses; Generally (on all levels ol a building or outside a building), Vail Town
Code, to allow for a private parking lot, located at 730, 724, and 714 West Lionshead
Circle/Tracts A, B, C, & D, Morcus Subdivision and Lot 7, Marriott Subdivision, and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (West Day Lot)
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by Braun and Associates
Inc.
Planner: Warren Campbell
TEXT AMENDMENT
MOTION; Doug Cahill
APPROVED
SECOND: Rollie Kjesbo VOTE:6-0
4. A request for a major subdivision pursuant to Chapter 13-3, Major SuMivision, Vail Town
Code, to allow lor the platting of the ski-way tract and four lots at the Lionshead tennis court
site and a rezoning pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Administration, Vail Town Code, from
Agriculture and Open Space zone district lo Primary/Secondary Two-Family Residential zone
district to allow for the construction of residential dwelling units on the four proposed lots and
from Agriculture and Open Space zone district to Outdoor Recreation zone district to allow
for the ski lifts, tows, and runs located at 615 West Forest Road/Unplatted (A complete metes
and bounds legaldescription is available for review at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department).
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: WarrenCampbell
MOTION: Gary Hartman SEGOND: Doug Gahill
TABLED TO OECEMBER 8,2OO3
5. A request for a setback variance, pursuant to Section 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code,
to allow for a garage addition, located at 1956 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 45, Vail Village
West 2nd Filing.
Applicant: David lrwin
Planner: Matt Gennett
MOTION: Gary Hartman SECOND: Doug Cahill
VOTE: 6-0
MOTION: Rollie Kjesbo SI
TABLED TO DECEMBEB 8,2OO3
VOTE:6-0
TABLED TO DECEMBER 8,2OO3
6. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for proposed text amendments to
Section 12-3-6, Hearings, Vail Town Code, to amend the notice requirements for Town of
Vail Design Review Board public hearings, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant Town of Vail
Planner: RussellForrest
MOTION: Gary Hartman SECOND: Doug Gahill
TABLED TO DECEMBER 8, 2OO3
7. Approval of November 10, 2003 minutes
MOTION: Gary Hartman SECOND: Doug Cahill
APPROVED
8. lnformalion Update
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Departmenl, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published November 21, 2003, in the Vail Daily
VOTE:6-0
VOTE: G0
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT;
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
November 24,2003
A request for variances from Section 12-6D-6 (Setbacks) and Title 14 (Development
Standards- locating required parking in the Right-of-Way), Vail Town Code, to allow
for a residential addition and remodel located at 2955 Bellflower Dr. (Peters Chalet) /
Lot 6, Block 6, Vail lntermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Alan and Francine Peters, represented by Peter Archer & Associales Planner: Warren Campbell
il.
SUMMARY
The applicant, Alan and Francine Pelers, represented by Peter Archer, are requesting
variances from Section 12-6D-6 (Setbacks) and Title 14 (Development Standards- locating
required parking in the Right-of-Way), Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition and
remodel located at 2955 Bellflower Dr. (Peters Chalet) / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
The variances are requested to allow the applicant to construct an addition which includes a
250 addilion to the primary unit in the front and side setbacks and to allow for required
parking in the right-of-way. Staff is recommending approval of the requested variances as a
hardship exists and would not constitute a granting of special privilege to this individual
property.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The owners, Alan and Francine Peters, are requesting variances from Seclion 12-6D-6
(Setbacks) and Title 14 (Developmenl Standards- locating required parking in the Right-of-
Way), Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition and remodel located at 2955
Bellflower Dr. (Peters Chalet) / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain. The applicant is
requesting the front and side yard setback variances to allow for a two-story addition which
will wrap around lhe west and south sides of the existing home. In addition, there is a
reguest for a variance from the requirement that all required parking be located on-site to
allow for two vehicle parking spaces to be located within the Town right-olway. A vicinity
map is afiached lor relerence {Attachment A).
On March 26, 2001 , the applicant received variance approvals for an application very similar
to this current proposal. Due to the cost to construct the previous design the applicant is
returning to the Planning and Environmenlal Commission to request the approval of a
slightly modified proposal. The change has occurred on lhe second floor in the southwest
corner of the master bedroom.
il1.
A letter from the applicant (Attachment B) is included which describes the request in greater
detail has been attached for reference, as have reductions of the proposal (Attachment C).
The descriptions of the variances requested are as follows:
1. Fronl Setback: The applicant is requesting a variance to allow for a front
setback of 9 feet. The proposal includes approximately 1 18.7 square teet of new
GRFA in the front setback and approximately 100 square teet of the garage within
the front setback.
2. Side Setback (west): The applicant is requesting a side setback variance to
allow for a west side setback ol 9.5 teet. The proposal includes approximately
128 square feet of new GRFA and approximately 29 square feet of the proposed
garage in the west setback.
3. Side Setback (east): The applicant is requesting a side setback variance to
allow for an east side setback of 11.8 feet. The proposed addition on the east
side of the structure includes approximately 25 square feet of GRFA in east side
setback. This setback is currently non-conforming, with a setback of 11.8 feet.
4. Parking in the right-of-way: The applicant is requesting a variance from the
requirement that all required parking must be located on site. The residence
requires a total of 5 parking spaces (3 for primary and 2 for EHU). One of the
parking spaces encroaches up to I ft. into the right-of-way.
BACKGROUND
The original plat for this property was recorded in 1970 when the property was located in
unincorporated Eagle County. The existing structure was construcled in 1977 undercounty
regulations requiring side yard setbacks of five feet. When the property was annexed into
the Town of Vail under Ordinance 15 in 1987 it was zoned Primary Secondary District with a
minimum side yard of 15 feet.
On November 2, 1983, this lot received approval to conslruct a secondary deed restricted
unit on the lot. At the time, the regulations required that 50% of the required parking be
enclosed. The applicant received a variance from this requirement. The variance was
granted based on the difficulty of building a garage on the site, specifically the Planning and
Environmental Commission found, "the garage would tend to overcrowd the lot and would
impair the common open space between the residence and the residence to the west."
On March 26,2001 , the Planning and environmental Commission approved both setback
and parking variances for this property. This application varies slightly from that previous
approval in that there is additional GRFA in the front setback. The previous approval as
expired.
On February 7, 2002, the Design Review Board approved the design on the home based on
the approved variances from March 26, 2003.
ROLES OF BEVIEWING BODIES
The PEC is responsible for evaluatino a proposal for:
Action: The PEC is responsible for linal approval/denial of a variance.
tv.
The PEC is responsible for evaluating a proposal for:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
structures in the vicinity.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a
specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment
among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this Title without grant of special
privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed
variance.
Desion Review Board:
Action: The DRB has NO review authority on a variance, but must review any
accompanying DRB application.
Town Council:
Actions of DRB or PEC maybe appealed to the Town Council or by the Town Council. Town
Council evaluates whether or nol the PEC or DRB erred with approvals or denials and can
uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision.
Staff:
The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and
plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also
advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines.
Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff
evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a
recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the
review process.
V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Vail Town Code
Section 1 2-2 Definitions
SETBACK: The distance from a lot or site line, creek or stream measured horizontally to a
line or location within the lot or site which establishes the permitted location of uses.
structures, or buildings on the site.
SETBACK LINE: A line or location within a lot or site which esfab/ishes the permitted
Iocation of uses, structures, or buildings on the site.
Or oo
SETBACK LINE, FBONT: The setback line extending the full width of the site parallelto and
measured from the front lot or site line.
SETBACK LINE, SIDE: The setback line extending from the front setback line to the rear
setback line parallel to and measured from the side lot or site line.
Section 12-6D Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS) District (in part)
12-6D-1: PURPOSE:
The two-family primary/secondary residential district is intended to provide sites for single-
family residentral uses or two-family residential uses rn which one unit is a larger primary
residence and the second unit is a smaller caretaker apartment, together with such public
facilities as may appropriately be located in the same district. The tvvolamily
primary/secondary residential district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, privacy and
open space for each dwelling, commensurate with singlelamily and two-family occupancy,
and to maintain the desirable residential qualities of such sites by establishing appropriate
site developm ent stan d ards.
12-6D-5: LOT AREA AND SITE DTMENSTONS:
The minimum lot or site area shall be fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of buildable area,
and each site shall have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). Each site shall be of a size
and shape capable of enclosing a square area, eighty feet (80') on each side, within its
boundaries.
12-6D-6: SETBACKS:
ln the primary/secondary residential district, the minimum front setback shall be tvventy feet
(20'), the minimum side setback shall be fifteen feet (15'), and the minimum rear setback
shall be fifteen feet (15').
12-6D-7: HEIGHT:
For a flat roof or mansard roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed thirty feet (30'). For a
sloping roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed thirty three feet (33').
1 2-6D-8: DENSITY CONTROL:
A. Dwelling Units: Not more than a total of two (2) dwelling units shall be permitted on
each site with only one dwelling unit permifted on existing /ots /ess than fourteen
thousand (14,000) square feet.
B. Gross Besidential Floor Area:
1. The following gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted on each site:
a. Twenty five (25) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for
each one hundred (100) square feet of the first fifteen thousand
(15,000) square feet of site area; plus
b. Ten (10) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each
one hundred (100) square feet of site area over fifteen thousand
(15,000) square feet, not to exceed thirty thousand (30,000) square
oo oo
feet of site area; plus
c. Five (5) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each
one hundred (1 00) square feet of site area in excess of thifi thousand
(30,000) square feet.
2. ln addition to the above, four hundred twenty five (425) square feet of gross
residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permifted for each allowable dwelling unit.
C. Employee Housing Units: Notwithstanding the provision of subsections A and B of
this Section, a Type I employee housing unit shall be permitted on lots of less than
fourteen thousand (14,000) square feet in accordance with the provisions of Chapter
13 of this Title. Any Type I employee housing unit existing on or before April 18,
2000, shall not be eliminated unless all dwelling units are demolished, in which case
the zoning on the property shall apply. However, an existing Type I employee
housing unit may be replaced with a Type ll employee housing unit on lots of
fourteen thousand (14,000) square feet or greater.
1 2-6D-9: SITE COVERAGE:
Site coverage shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total site area
12-6D-10: LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT:
At least siw percent (60%) of each site shall be landscaped. The minimum of any area
qualifing as landscaping shall be ten teet (10') (width and length) with a minimum area not
less than three hundred (300) square feet.
12-6D-11: PARKING:
Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 ot this Title.
Section 12-17 Vatiances (in part)
12-17-1: PURPOSE:A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: ln order to prevent or to lessen such practical
difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this
title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from
certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of
existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in
the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions
in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal
compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance.
B. Development Standards Excepted: Variances may be granted only with respectto the
development standards prescribed for each district, including lot area and site
dimensions, setbacks, distances between buildings, height, density control, building
bulk control, site coverage, usable open space, landscaping and site development,
and parking and loading requirements; or with respectto the provisions of chapter | 1
of this title, governing physical development on a site.
oo oo
C. Use Begulations Not Affected: The power to grant variances does not extend to the
use regulations prescribed for each district because the flexibility necessary to avoid
results inconsistent with the objectives of this title is provided by chapter 16,
"Conditional Use Permits", and by section 12-3-7, "Amendment" of this title.
12-17-5: PTANN/NG AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION ACTION:
Within twenty (20) days of the closing of a public hearing on a variance application, the
planning and environmental commission shall act on the application. The commission may
approve the application as submitted or may approve the application subject to such
modifications or conditions as it deems necessary to accomplish the purposes of this title, or
the commission may deny the application. A variance may be revocable, may be granted for
a limited time period, or may be granted subject to such other conditions as the commission
may prescribe.
12-17-6: CRITERIA AND FINDINGS:A. Factors Enumerated: Before acting on a variance application, the planning and
environmental commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the
requested variance:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
structures in the vicinity.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement
of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of
treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without
grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the
proposed variance.
B. Necessary Findings: The planning and environmental commission shall make the
following findings belore granting a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the variance is wananted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
oo oo
b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to
other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the same district.
l2-17-7: PERMIT APPROVAL AND EFFECT:
Approval of the variance shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and
construction not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion within two (2) years
from when the approval becomes final.
SITE ANALYSIS
Zoning:Two-Family Primary/Secondary District
Land Use Plan Designation: Low Density Residential
Current Land Use: Residential
Develooment Standard Allowed
Lot Area: 15,000 sq. ft.
Setbacks:
Fronl:
Sides:
Rear:
Building Height:
GRFA:
Primary
EHU
Site Coverage:
Landscape Area:
Parking:
vil.SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
Existinq
8,624 sq. ft.
20' 't4.4',
15' (east) 11.8'l5'(west) 20.5'
50'Gore Creek 62.5'
33',
2,831 sq. ft.
1,175 sq. ft.
2,156 sq. ft.(25%) 1 ,1'18 sq. ft. (13%) 2,053 sq. ft. (23.8./")
4,743 sq. ft. (55%) 6,510 sq. tt. (75%) 5,704 sq. ft. (66%)
4 spaces 2 spaces 4 spaces
(2intheR.O.W)
25'
1,631 sq. ft.
827 sq. ft.
Proposed
No change
9'
11.8',
9.5'
51.5'
33',
2,806 sq. ft.
821 sq. ft.
North:
South:
East:
West:
Land Use
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Zoninq
Residential Cluster zone district
Two-Family Primary/Secondary zone dislrict
Two-Family Primary/Secondary zone district
Two-Family Primary/Secondary zone district
VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
A. Consideration of Factors Reqardino the Setback Variances:
The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and struclures in the vicinity.
Setbacks:
When this proposal was reviewed and approved on March 26, 2001, the
applicant modified their proposal to reduce the extent of the encroachment
into the setback along the west property line to a minimum of 9.5 ft. This
includes 128 square feet of GRFA and 29 square feet of garage in the west
side setback. Staff believes that the applicant worked to reduce the setback
encroachment which will allow for additional landscaping, thus reducing the
impact of the proposed addition to other structures in the vicinity, most
notably, lhe structure to the west.
The front setback was increased by the applicant when under review by the
Planning and Environmental Commission and was approved to be 9 feet.
This includes 118.7 square feet of GRFA and 100 square feet of garage.
Due to the configuration of the right-ol-way of this lot, staff believes that there
will be minimal impacts on existing or potential slructures in the vicinity.
The existing structure is currently 11.8 feet from the east property line. This
proposal does not increase the encroachment but does add 25 square feet
of GRFA on the east elevation. Staff does not believe this minimal addition
on the east elevation will negatively impact the neighboring property.
Parkino in the riqht-of-wav:
The proposed parking in the right-of-way encroaches up to 11 ft. into the
righfof-way. Due to the configuration of the lot and the applicant's attempt to
minimize the encroachment, staff believes that the proposed parking in the
right-of-way will have no effect on structures in the vicinity.
The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the obiectives of this title without a grant of special privilege.
While in the review process previously the applicant revised the plans,
minimizing lhe encroachment into the front and side setbacks in order to
receive a vote of approval for the variances. By designing a one-car garage,
the applicant has increased the west side setback from 3 feet to 9.5 feet and
the front setback from 8 feet to 9 feet. Staff does not believe lhis variance
request to be a grant of special privilege. The size, configuration, existing
structure, and 50 ft. stream setback are all physical hardships on this lot
which greatly restrict the ability of improvements to be made to the struclure
without a variance. The lot is nonconforming with regards to lot size and the
house currently encroaches into the front and side setbacks. Many of the
1.
2.
3.
structures in the neighborhood have similar encroachments into the setbacks
(see below).
The effect ol the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traflic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
The modilication to the proposal has eliminated the structure from the
existing 5 foot drainage easement. The Public Works Departmentwill accept
a revocable right-of-way permit for the improvements proposed within that
easement and for the parking in the right-of-way. Staff does not believe that
the variance will have a negative effect on the factors listed above.
Locataon Description ol the site
2923 Bellflower Nonconforming 4-plex approved by Eagle County.
Encroaches I ft. into the stream setback, 7.5 ft. into the
east setback, and encroaches into the riqht-otway.
2933 Bellflower No information available.
2943 Bellflower Granted a tront setback variance to allow lor a front
setback ol 13 ft. Side setbacks are nonconforming at 12
ft. and 5 ft.
2953 Bellflower Granted a parking variance to not enclose parking in
coniunction with EHU. Meets all setback reouirements.
2953 Bellflower Granted setback variances allowing for a 6 ft. front
setback, 6.4 ft. east side setback, and 8.4 ft. side setback.
2983 Bellflower No information available.
3003 Bellflower Granted tront setback variance to allow for a 13 ft. front
setback, with GRFA being allowed beneath the garage.
Side setback variance was denied.
2992Belltlower Denied (by Council) a side setback variance lor garage
and GRFA. Meets all setback requirements.
2982 Bellflower Meets all setback requirements.
2972 Bellflower Meets all setback reouirements.
2962 Bellflower No information available.
2852 Bellflower Nonconforming. Encroaches into the tront setback 9 ft.
and 1 ft. into side setback.
2942Belltlower Granted a front setback variance lor a garage and storage
area to allow for a 15.5 ft. front setback. Nonconformino
with a 7 ft. encroachment into the east side setback.
2932 Bellflower Meets all setback requirements.
2995 Basinqdale No information available.
2975 Basinodale Meets all setback reouirements.
2955 Basinodale Garage located in front setback.
2945 Basinodale Nonconlorming. Encroaches into side setback 7 ft.
2935 Basingdale Granted front setback variance to allow for GRFA below
garage in front setback. Below grade encroachment of
18.5 ft.
2925 Basingdale Granted front setback variance to allow for a front setback
ol 13 ft.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to
the proposed variance.
The Planninq and Environmental Commission shall make the followino findinos
before oranlino a variance;
1. That the granting ol the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the
same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranled for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict inlerpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district.
IX. STAFF REGOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends approval of the requests for variances
from Section 1 2-6D-6 (Setbacks) and Title 14 (Development Standards- locating required parking in
the Rightof-Way), Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition and remodel located at 2955
Bellflower Dr. (Peters Chalet) / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain. Staff's recommendation is based
upon the review of the criteria in Section Vlll ol this memorandum and the evidence and testimony
presented, subject 1o the following findings:
1. That the granting of the variances does not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the Primary/Secondary
Residential Zone District.
2. That the granting of lhe variance will not be detrimental to the public health, salety or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the setback regulations results
in a practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsislent with the
development objectives of the Town Code or the Primary/Secondary Residential
Zone District.
10
4. That the strict interpretalion or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive
the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same
district.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the variance
requests, staff recommends the following conditions:
1. That prior to final design review approval, the applicant provides a landscape plan
which includes provisions to adequately buffer the surface parking area from
adjacent properties.
2. That the applicant submits a revocable right-of-way permit to Public Works for all
improvements located within the drainage easement and right-of-way prior to
issuance of the building permit.
3. That the applicant shall submit a foundation lmprovement Location Certiticate (lLC)
upon completion of the installation of the foundation walls and a framing ILC prior to
a framing inspection for review and approval by staff in order to verify compliance
with the approved variances.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Letter from applicant
C. Reduced copies ol the proposal
D. Publication Notice
1'l
$
:il'
Attachment: A
PAA
trNl twl
October 23
oo oo
. 2003
Town of Vail
75 South Fronlage Road
Vail. Colorado tlSA
8 1657
Attention: Mr. Warren Camobell
Dear Sir:
RE: FRONTYARDSETBACKVARJANCE
FOR PETERS CHALI,T
2955 BELLFLOWER DRIVE
VAIL, COLORADO
Attached is the remainder of our application for a variance for the Peters Chalet. 2955 Bellflower Drive.
Vail. Colorado. As you are aware. the existing two-storey frame chalet is significantly within the front
yard and both side yard setbacks on this property. The front yard setback. particularl), towards the
western portion of the propeny*, is considerably skewed frorn the actual street line being almost 30'
back frorn the street line whereas the front yard setback at the eastern edge of the propeny* is
approximately one yard from the street line. Obviously, this would make the existing dwelling seenr to
be correctly situated on the property. however, in developing and enlarging this eristing chalet, which
only has allowable building space lo the west, this problern becomcs greatly exacerbated when the
actual front yard setback is placed on the propertv. l-his is evident as indicated on the sitc plan
submitted. Drawing S- l submined with this application.
Ilarly in 2001, the Town of Vail and the Design Review Board granted us perrnission to br-rild the chalet
vrith an intrusion into the front yard setback. The front portion ofthe nerv addition. constructed to thc
west of the existing dwelling consists of a garage on the main level and bedrnom additions on the
second level. The bedroom additions are not aligned with the garage and in fact are considerably'
setback frorn the rcar addition.
In our original application to the Design Review Board, we cut back a portion ofthe existing chalel on
the second floor, however, a new portico was added in front ofthe chalet. which intruded into the fiont
yard setback. This is as indicated on our Drawing A-4. Although the second floor of the existing chalet
was cut back approximately five feet, the second floor over the new addition was cut back even further.
Subsequent to being granted this variance and approval by the Design Review Board, we proceeded to
prepare contract documents for application for building permit and for pricing. In reviewing the extent
Peter Archer & Associates, Architect
Architect, Urban & Regional Planners, Project Managers
78A Mulcaster Street. Barrie, Ontario, L4M 3M4
Phone: (705) 735-9544 Fax: [705) 735-9541 E-Mail: parcherassociates@rogers.com Attachment: B
of the work required for this seconci tloor cutback, it was realized that the entire roof and a substantial
portion of the second floor would have to be removed to accommodate this change. The structural
inrplications to accommodate this revision to the second floor were substantial and onerous and were
extensive throughout the entire house including the basement foundation work. As a result, our client is
requesting that we approach the Town of Vail with permission to leave the existing second floor of the
chalet as is. which would allow for the existing roof to remain. and negate the need for the extensive
structural modifications. As th:: is already an existing structure intruding into the front yard setback,
which is skewed from the street line. we believe tlris to be a minor request.
In preparing the altemate elevations fbr this request for a variance. we are of the opinion that this
revision l-ras very little impact on the original proposed elevation.
This change as indicated by the double hatching on our drawing A-3. Revision 6.
The second portion of the variance we are requesting is an additional 18" in interior space for the
second floor only. This is indicated by the single hatching on Drawing A-3. Revision 6. The reason
for this change is that while quite minimal in impact, it will result in a more reasonablc width to the
Master Bedroom. Currently. the width which would he approxirlately ll %' which is less than
adequate for a master bedroom suite. such as is envisioned by these renovations. The new bedroom
width would be I 3'. which is reasonable for a Master bedroom suite.
The additional area is being requested at the front of the chalet as the interior wall of tlre Master
Bedroom is the main load bearing wall for the interior of the chalet which. if altered would also have
major structural implications as the wall and the adjacent stair would have to be relocated.
We believe this variance to be a minor request as the overall intent and approach to the renovation of
this chalet is substantially the same as that previously approved by the Town of Vail. Planning
Department and the Design Revieu'Board. As well. please keep in mind, this revision requested is on
tlre second floor only. there is no lurther grade level revision required or anticipated.
We would also like to point out that the original application and submission to the Design Review
Board did not use all the allowable square footage for this propert-v. Even though additional square
footage. approximately 90 + square feet is being added by this revisiorr. we would like to not that we are
still within the allowable square footage for this propeq'.
This requested variance has very little implication or change to any of the adjacent structures. either to
their use or potential uses. The relief we are requesting in order to keep the sccond floor of the existing
dwelling has no change on adjacerrt properties as this area is already within the building. We arc simply
requesting that we not be required to cut the building back on the second floor. Therefore. this has no
afl'ect on adjacent properties. 'l-he second variance we are requesting is the additional 18" on the second
floor over the new garage. As the existing dwelling is already l0' from the western propert-v line in this
area and the proposed further incursion into the front yard setback is only 1 8", this has little or no affecl
onto the adjacent property. The house to the west, which would be most directll, affected, is not
directly placed on the adjacent property but in fact is approximately 20'- 30'away from the property
line.
There would be no change to shading. air. distribution of population. transportation. utilities, etc. or
anlthing by either ofthese revisions.
Peter Archer & Associates, Architect
Architect, Urban & Regional Planners, Proiect Managers
78A Mulcastcr Strcet, Barric, Ontario, L4M 3M4
Phone: (705) 735-9W Fax: (705) 735-9Y7 E-mail: parcherasscrciates@rogers.com
We would also like to note that even though this is still an incursion into the front yard setback the
existing chalet and the new addition would be roughly in line with the adjacent structures on this street
and would not any intrude further into front yard setback than the adjacent dwellings. This would
therefore preserve the street line and edge.
As stated above, we believe this variation to be quite minor in nature as we are within the allowable
square footage allowed by the rlunicipality, a substantial portion of the variance we are requesting is
already built. and the additional square footage over the garage is minimal. being approxim ately 26.45
square feet.
We trust you will look favourably upon this request and should you have any further queries, please do
undersiqned.
ARCIIER & ASSOCIATES LTD.
Peter Archer, B. Arch., O.A.A.
President
PA:sl
Peter Archer & Associates, Architect
Architect, Urban & Regional Planners, Project Managers
Barrie, Ontario I-,tM 3M4
Fax: (705) 73r9il1, E-mail: parcherassociates@rogers.com
78A Mulcaster Strcet,
Phone (705) 735-9W
I I
I I
I
I I
I
J l, i'ii rrtlt ll
,il elifltii!
lll tr,ldilli
6d[ $ttitE 6tl
lldi
.gl.iii
liiill|i
I t
I :t
il
ill
!II
III
lil llr -L-r lmtrl
i t i
I
f ,l i ll{itg
ilii
,iiriii
s u o
I t
"J J u o
t
flr
Hi
fi li t
Ex r6
I
'nl'fiiil[llffi
F
rl
t
a
I
a I I
.J
til
Ef;,
l
rl
gu#l
Erffi
o
I sg i .ll
l;--'1 :i:.'/ "-t:El
5! |. ;-.---t----
I
i
I
,I
7
:l
-.t* -/
trf,-lH1'
ilt7 'l,ll
I I
il
n It
I
I
iet
d I
dl <l ul lrl
fll
\
l
v
T'
I
It
5!
it
i
I
EI I
t
*E i !tl ilg
l! 'l
,i['ufi
I ,l r
/
zl {l
dl
g
ol <l
tu
,ol
gi
Hi
'lr,
ffififi
oo
I
rl
,I
I
I
,
t
I
I
I
I
I!?
Ef; 'I
lfr
g*d
Exffi
Hrr
\#t-
-T
I t f,...,--'-'-"
4 J
IL
F z ut
E
s {o
;r-fid
fiffiffi
It rt
I
I
il I
I
,
t
I
f
I
I
t
I
lr!
E:I li r
Ef; t
I
lc
IF
gun{
83ffi
I
\#.t.
1
1
I
I
/
zl
fl
fll ol
ol JI |tl
sl CI orl
/
4r
Hli*i
Hii l$ r
I l
\#.-
ig}is l>l:ir l>lo
i5 lI
'.9_ ,_
o
o
fi
&
*l,ffilu!ffi
I
d
I
,
I
I t
!I i
;I ri I
E[ '
I
IE I E*rnt!
Erffi
I
I
I
I.r iri
I-
ktu llPr
zl
ol
FI {l
>l ru JI ul
FI ol <l
tul
1J
ll !t tt
,l
Bl
!t
I
I
I l
I
I
*[ffi]gffi
U'V
lr
I
,l It
I
I
t
I
ra I I
a
t
I
U-
til
Ef; ,
gud
Htm
t
"li
t\
'.il
\t i\
'tt j
\f rl l,t ll
\-
\
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
\
I
I
t'
t'
t\t\I
\
I
I
\
I
\
I
I
\
I
I
\
\
I
I
ri
zl
el FI {l
>l l|ll JI
rrtl
rl FI fll ol zl
,t?=" MAY AFFE.T YouR PRoP=tP
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section .12-3-6 of the Vail Town Code on,
November 24,2003, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Library Community Room. In
consideration of:
A request for a major subdivision, pursuant lo Chapter 13-3, Major Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to
allow for the plalting of Lots 1 and 2, Lodge Subdivision, located at 164 Gore Creek Drive/Lots A, B,
& C, Block 5C, Vail Village First Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Lodge Tower South Condominium Association, represented by Stan Cope Planner: George Ruther
A request for variances from Section 12-6D-6 (Setbacks) and Title 14 (Development Standards-
locating required parking in the Right-of-Way), Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition
and remodel located at 2955 Bellflower Dr. (Peters Chalet) / Lol 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and
setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Alan and Francine Peters, represented by Peter Archer & Associates Planner: Warren Camobell
A requesl for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for proposed text amendments to Section
12-7H-5, Conditional Uses; Generally (on all levels of a building or outside a building), Vail Town
Code, to allow single{amily residential dwellings and two-family residential dwellings as conditional
uses in the Lionshead Mixed Use-1 District. A request for a conditional use permit, pursuant lo
Seclion 12-7H-5, Conditional Uses; Generally (on all levels of a building or outside a building), Vail
Town Code, and a request for a major exlerior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7H-7, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for lhe construction of twelve new single-
family and two{amily residential dwelling units; and a requesl for a conditional use permit, pursuant
to Section 12-7H-5, Conditional Uses; Generally (on all levels of a building or outside a building),
Vail Town Code, to allow for a private parking lot, located at 730, 724, and 714 West Lionshead
Circle/Tracts A, B, C, & D, Morcus Subdivision and Lot 7, Marriott Subdivision, and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (West Day Lot)
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by Braun and
Associates Inc.Planner: Warren Campbell
The applications and information about these proposals are available lor public inspection during regular
business hours at the Town of Vail Communily Development Department office, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation held in the Town of Vail Community Development Department
off ice and the site visits that precede the public hearing. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional inlormation.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with z4-hour notilicalion. Please call (970) 479-2356,
Telephone lor the Hearing lmpaired, lor additional information.
This notice published in the Vail Daily on November 7, 2003.
Aftachment: D
n" r-n?-n2
T0lt4\I
0l,27pnr Fron-T0lll{ Or v[JillrY DEVEL0PII|IT s704752152 T-589 P 002/01r F-613
Application for Review by the
Planning and Environmental Commission
Degartrnent of Community Dwelopment
75 South Fronfdge Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
. u,eb: \ Mrur.cj.\rail.co.us
General Inforrnation:
All projecfs requiring ptanning and Environmental Comrnission revierv mu* receive appmval prior to submitting a
buitding permit applibUon. Flease refer to the zubmittal requirements for the padicular approval hat is requested.
An apdication foi'planning and Envrronmenbl Commission revierrv cannot be accepted until all required infomation
is reiiiveO by the Comrnunity Derelopment Department- The project may also need to be reviewed by the Tonn
Council and/or the Design Revierv Board.
Type of Application and Fee:
D Rezoning $1300
O Major SuMivision $1500
0 Minor Subdivision $650
tr Exemption Plat $650
B Minor Amendment b an SDD $1000
tr New Special Development District $6000
O MajorAmendmentto an sDD 56000
O Major Amendmert to an SDO $1250
(rto arteior nodifi ations)
Description of tie Request setback for second
tr Conditional Use Permit $650 tr Floodplain Modificafion $400 D Minor Exterior AlteGtion $650
tr Major Exterior Alteration $800 tr Develooment Plan $1500 tr Amendment to a oevelopment Plan $250 O Zoninq Code Amendment $1300
![ Variance $500
tr Sign Varlance $200
Requesf re'l i af f r^rn alprovt!.q f r.\nf ve r,'i
floor on1v.
Location of tlre Proposall Lot; 6 Block: 6-. Subdivision:Va i I T nf-ermrlunt-a-i_o-
Physical Address: 2955 Bellflorrer Drive
parcef No.: 2IO3I4307OO7 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-84+0 for parcel no.)
Zoning;
Name(s) of Owner(s):Alan & Francine Peters
Mailing Address:
'n^r^h+^ r\]\l rvrvrr!v,M5P
owner(s) Signature(s):
20 Old Forest HlII ROA O
Phone:4I6.
tL-lTuqos
Nameof App1lon1' Peter Archer & As
Mailing Address:78A Mulca ster Street
Barrie, oN T.av lua Canartr Phone:(705) 735-9544
'iarr.horaqqnni a t a c{broger-s--' com /?.rE\ .1.t8 E-*rirrrrrrar<s.%ar [ 705 ) 735-954-l
-For Office Use OnlY:
Fee Paicl:
Page I of6-01/18/02
O t
ARFORD, CR,AIG T.
2962 BELLFLOWER DR
vArL, co 81657
PETERSON, RALPH
8297 QUADRANT AVE S
HASTINGS, MN 55033
LANGMAID, KIMBERLY . CASABONNE, PETER
PO BOX 6112
VAIL, CO 81658
ISUB:VAIL INTERMOUNTAIN DEV SUB
iBLK:6 LOT:5 BK-0233 PG-0047 QCD
lL2-28-73 BK-0241 PG-0393 WD
t08-14-75 BK-0247 PG-0747 LWT
lot-zg-to
BLK:6 LOT;16
B:VAIL INTERMOUNTAIN DEV SUB
jBLK;6 LOT:14 BK-0551 PG-0865 QCD
3-29-91 BK-0551 PG-0867 QCD
i04-05-91 R707672 WD 08-16-99
109-01-99 R7O9642 WD 09-01-99
R709643 WD 09-01-99 R709644 WD
iR709646 WD 09-01-99 R709647 WD
VLAAR, MARY J. & HANS M.
PO BOX 4121
vArL. co 81658
VINEYARD VAIL VENTURES
766 RACE ST
DENVER, CO 80206
DUTT, ]EREMY W.
2958 S FRONTAGE RD W A1
VAIL. CO 81657
UB:VAIL INTERMOUNTAIN DEV SUB
IBLK:6 LOT:7 DESC: AKA UNITS A & B
IBK-0s36 PG-0007 QCD 06-29-90
BK-0536 PG-0008 QCD 06-07-90
BK-oss1 PG-0259 QCD 0B-03-90
BK-0606 PG-0173 QCD 04-04-93
iBLK:5 DESC: PARCEL A BK-0653
{PG-0670 MAP 10-27-94 BK-0681
IPG-0200 QCD 08-16-9s R710429 QCD
09-16-99 R798065 QCD 06-07-02
R798372 QCD 06-12-02
NDO: INTERLOCHEN CONDO UNIT:1
cir5c:SLDGT ek-osji pc-oei+ qcD
10-26-81 BK-0437 PG-0400 PTD
03-04-86 BK-0443 PF-O767 WD
,t +* * ** * * *,t * i + * * * * * * * ** * * ** * + * '! *+ * * * * * * * * * * + + * * * *.,f t **+************ ** * * **:t**** * **+*+* +*** *** **
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement ,t**++******+* ******* ***+*******t+*******+**++ *****************+************************'r****
Statement Number: R030005021- Anount: $500.00 70/28/2OO3O7:52 AM
Palment Method: Check Init: DF
Notation: #02:-
Permj"t No: PEC030075 qrtr)e: PEC - Variance
Parcel No: 21,03f430'70O7
Site Address: 2955 BELLFLOWER DR VATL
LOCAtiOn: 2955 BETLFIJOWER DRTVE
Total FeeE: 5500.00
This Payment: 9500.00 Total J{I!! E}mts: $500.00
Balance: 30.00
*!t**** *+** *** * * + * * * * * ** * * * ** * * *,* * * * * + + * * * * * ** * 't * * * * * * * * + * * * +* * * t ********** * * * * * * * * *,! * * * * * +* *
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Cunrent Pmts
PV OO1OOOO31125OO PEC APPLICATION FEES 500.00
8" r!d. trlrn - tgp.
lo" ptd. ta.cla
4" u'd- rrlm - tgP.
4' ud- trtm - tgp.
U" sd. trln
O' cwvcd ud. trln
-
SItEco
SEUTH ELEVATION
2- {l rIa nE:xr; rxf a {uarE |,iEs
J. ru $*'l$.6 rxf rc r cff.rc! ao rERflao 0r sm
. ny o6crpI€:E dr6sa6. oi anois ^rl m Ea irloclfo Io nc c0r6lfixr.
-ro.f clErrn d m oere]cas, I'io.s' or ('.ssrorG 5 Ecrr,rD lror l}€ co.rsrjlrs.5, rrl d|gnc c(!0rD6 m E oeor& rrs tdthaD
{,r sflE Fard rc cor6rrrrn6}r... OIII,Y T 1ET ^P'RMI lxMES M |l€ UlE FDi
7 rI O|t.x6 !O sDrcrTrr06 irxrri tHa tioFtxrY 6 Dt CO{Sr,lIrfI. .x0 9rrt1 Sr€ ftruraD ro nra ,. r€ st sru n€m^iiics noloe SDFacrrrE ino,r trl plrr65!.r
reP"ry
Dot Pkd.d: Ptdt 5.d.:
J,'t 9/Ol n16
RE OVATIONS to the
PETEAS CHALET
VaE,Coloredo
PROPOSED
SOUTH ELEVATIOI{
A1
uo*"v;q.:Y€'99"--
/t 1___,-:---F --.,-^;;l.r4 Jr""d' r - ,,- )
4_ -Fto ot ?tc-"-- t. ______J ,,I ,,.
f- _-1
UEST ETEVATION
36" htgh ud. .atltng
uilth r!d- plc|(Ets
b'r6" wd. potl - l,lplctl
^u r.AsrEIxE r,t r srr-n 3 tr{6s
ru otar6rr .E m r ecxrD
^ro
\a*l.o o.i 9ll
aY oEcE ^rcfs, 0r*9416. F rrio.s rxf rt) E et?oflEo ro lrrf co|6r,lrrn fb E Oft Crrrf,sln o E dic (xs!r6 E RECOVID rro|r rE @id^'rm.
orti urlsl
^PPRovrD
oRrc ro rf (6E rla
ru oi^rl€s ^]o 'l€c|urli6 ftr..n rE PRottFr 6 m cdsulrM. ^ro sr{r E ifhJirED To Dr€c{||grraxr .poi n&iJasr_cn^r6 rslo sr€cr|crmrc r idI d i Pxr E rttidia 0i D6|l6m
Dot notbd:JetOlQl t,a5
srdd D.r. Au4-lzo@d
V4'.1'-O'
PETEFS CHALET
RENOVATOIIS to tho
Val, Colorado
PROFOSED
WEST ELEVATION
P R
PAA *ffi
A5
l.av,lcd U.A. Sldt1€
urd, faacla
ta artcfr Exlotlng
I t------ili ; rr'
-l -r- |L_l
ll cl
EAST ELEVATIEN
3b" ht9l1 !td. rttltt€
urlth ord. plclrta
r, m pr sc$ tf,|r'ns.2-
^U
r:f,rEtni rf, i Lrrflrs urEE
J,
^t!
DUari$S ,rr lo E criEcxo !o r|ttn:D ol glE ,ioi m coarnf,fi)|(a |,r 06cllt rsas, o6s&t6. d liiG rf ro E tFomfD m nrt co.Grf,raxt ro nll E to Pioc@ ffi culrrltbll 0n !{f rlsartPiGf,s, dKnl oi ors{F 6 i[cEr/rD rifl nE corBr rat
5- |U, DiED6 CnaOOi6 tO Ea C'ECa.o rO t:rntD oi grE Fnn ls cd|slnEn*.. oaY r rEsf rrtao\/lD Dilrr6s ro E r6aD mi
, {r 0*r|ie6 {D srtE ErrEis is.r'r nt ,fo9€*r c 1l€ c{rE-i- d. r0 9|ar E nmjr||D l( n€
cor6rJrf.xr |'o|| il!|t'l rr rD w 9{! n?
DirflnCS
^rOlol
srfarr|loE .r rs{t or '. trlt * iFeool€aD or orEt,rED |tDour ,E P€FGsrr
ItEt|irt ia\dor.
Jan t@lol
srdr Dob l|44 2o&
PETERS CTIALET
RENOVATIOI{S to the
Veil Oolorado
PBOPOSED
EAST E.EVATIOII
PEIIRARCHER
PAA
A6
12" u!,d. latela
6" u,cl tr||n
2\l2r dad. latclE
16tt htglt uld- ratlttg
urlth uld, Plcktr
6"x6" ud. Poct - tgPleal
NORTi+ EI-EVAT|CN
E CI€OCD r.ro vrXrD 0rr stlE
6 0i ti-rs ,E ro !a n r€ ml|( a lb Ftcm t D6CErr-E ffi, Oe
E Crfc&! ra var[D
tfarurorG rr $fr.l 0l n Piit
06riatrD irlojr Da Ffin6rr
otttiAl ity|.lol.l
oot Pbtr.(! Pror s.e
J.n P/Ol L4
sto.r oot AEtd?o@
PETERS C}I,ALET
REiIOVATIO||S to the
Val. Colorado
PROPOSED
NORTH E.EVATION
Br Ca.t rM ?hd- )G-zS-ta.ra
A7
JlrqM 0{e^BN
| (aql
<:
tJ
I
l\l
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 r 38
Fllx 970-479-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
February 26,2004
Peler Archer and Associates
c/o Peter Archer
78A Mulcaster Street
Barrie, Ontario Canada L4M 3M4
Re: Peters Residence Final Review submittal/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Mr. Archer,
This letter is being sent to summarize the comments of the Design Review Board and
staff_at the February 18,2004, meeting regarding your proposed aJdition and remodel to the Peters residence. The follow comments shoud be'addressed in the resubmitted
materials for your final design review.
Please revise lhe floor plans to show the new windows proposed on the south
elevation.
Please revise the roof plan shown on the contours to show the clip
Please revise the south elevation to have a third material on the upper level. The
Board suggested horizontal siding, however, it could remain stucco if you revise
the east elevation as described below. The DRB also suggested cutting the roof
feature over the garage door back slightly.
Please carry around the third material on the upper level. A design solution to
adding a third material could be to carry around the wood trim details and stucco
from the south elevation so that there is a consislent architectural theme on all
the elevations.
Please revise the north elevation to have a balanced gable detail. Also carry
around the third material. Remember material changes should occur at insid6
corners. lf the gable is a problem a possible solution could be a shed oormer.
Also can the deck rail extend to the end of the building?
Please revise lhe west elevation to show the location of stone on the pillar al the
entry. Also show lhe introduction of the third material on the upper portion of the
home. The DRB suggested cutting the roof form over the gara!6 back slightly.
Please provide detail drawings of the widow trim out and materials to be uled.
Please provide cul sheets of any exterior lighting and their location. The code
permits one exlerior light for each 1,000 square feet of lot size which allows you
8 exterior fixtures.
I attached copies of the elevations which show the commenls of the DRB
graphically in markings on the elevations. These should help with some of the
above comments.
{g r"n uor r*
Please review these comments and if you have any questions regarding this letter
please contact me at 970-479-2148. ln order to be placed on the March 17,2004,
Design Review Board agenda revised plans addressing all the concerns listed above
need to be received in the Community Development office no laterthat 12:00 p.m. on
March 12, 2004. You need only submit two complele copies of the application. lf the
above items are nol received by March 12, 2004, your application will be tabled to April
7,2004.
tl*fi",td,'ry
Planner ll
Cc: File
Department of C ommunity Deve lopment
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-24s2
www.ci.vail. co.us
Peter Archer and Associates
cio Peter Archer
78A Mulcaster Street
Barrie, Ontario Canada L4M 3M4
Re: Peters Residence Final Review Submittal/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
February 9,2004
Mr. Archer,
This letter is lo inform you that if you would like to remain on the February 18, 2004, DRB agenda
revised plans addressing the concerns listed in my letter dated December 26, 2003, need to be
submitted to the Community Development Department no later than 3:30 pm on February 13, 2004. lf
plans are not received by this time you will be tabled to lhe March 3, 2004, DRB meeting.
Please review these comments and if you have any questions regarding this letter please contact me at
479-2148.
With regards,
Warren Campbell
Planner ll
Cc: File
{g u"ntur" ro
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Itail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
December 26, 2003
Peter Areher and Associates
c/o Peter Archer
78A Mulcaster Street
Barrie, Ontario Canada L4M 3M4
Re: Peters Residence Final Review Submittal/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail lntermountain
Mr. Archer,
This letter is being sent to summarize the comments of the Design Review Board and
staff al the December 17,2003, meeting regarding your proposed addition and remodel
to the Peters residence. The follow comments should be addressed in the resubrnitted
materials ior your final design review.
. Please provide a site plan which does not show the location of a car to the west
of the proposed garage. This space does nol meet the minimum requirements
for a vehicle.. Please provide a plan which shows the proposed roof plan on top of existing and
proposed grades so that height can be determined. Ridges should be labeled
with an elevation. Grades through the existing house may need to be
interpolaled.r Please revise the south elevation to have a lhird material on lhe upper level.
Please explain why the windows above the garage and the entry cannot be taller.. Please revise the east elevation to have the stone wrap around from the front to
the side. lt can step down as you come around. Also carry around the third
material on the upper level. lN the past people have used horizontal or vertical
wood siding or a different color of stucco with a belly band. Also clip the end of
the gable.. Please revise the north elevation lo have a balanced gable detail. Also carry
around the third material. Remember material changes should occur at inside
corners.. Please revise the west elevation to show the location of stone on the pillar at the
entry and wrap the stone around lrom the front of the garage. Also show the
introduction of the third material on the upper portion of the home.
' Please provide detail drawings of the widow trim out and materials to be used.. Please submit color samples ol the stucco, stone (a color digital photo will work),
and paint. Also a shingle sample which is a minimum of 300 pounds per square
as required by Code. Please provide cut sheets of any exterior lighting and their
location. The Code permits one exterior light for each 1,000 square feet of lot
size which allows vou 8 exterior fixlures.
{; r"n""aor^"n
o I attached copies of the elevations which show the commenls of the DBB
graphically in markings on the elevations. These should help with somoe of the
above comments.
Please review these comments and if you have any questions regarding this letter
please contact me at 970-479-2148. In order to be placed on the January 7,2004
Design Review Board agenda revised plans addressing all the concerns listed above
need to be received in the Community Development otfice no later that 12:00 p.m. on
December 31, 2003. You need only submit two complete copies of the application. lf
the above items are not received by December 31, 2003, your application will be tabled
to January 21, 2004. I will be out of the office until January 5, 2004, I hope you have
had a great holiday season and I will talk to you in 2004.
With regards,
4J,'*^0
WHrren Campbell
Planner ll
Cc: File
€
F "8 s'
&',l
lt
Lrl
R ....-t
>E
qB I I'
t-!\
I
--I5
{)
5
7l cl
r-l 4l
>l
finill
__fr1
{tnnl
TI
Ir- |il
(-\ |
I
I
i
I
I
i
)l
-J 1p--"
,<(-
q--
{t
-1_J
-{t
-1
-. 1 u;-l T1 __, I a" Jr I tt I €.r I =i,l t-l
I
I
I
I
I :r
El s 6l q-:t
?l
I
s)l FI 'rl
Y"i /;
()
- - ---Lr '
t"
,. N\\,y
' /u/At I tl' tt I -- --- I I
II
-v I
u
a
7l cl
-l {fl-l
<[l
>l
lilttilJill|
__ul
Irlflirl
ffl
tr-l
WI
cl
ZI
I
o
U l
dl
I
oo
\ l\
\ l--,)
\li
\,ii r! 'l lrs l\io '|\1., | \| \6 I \I i6 | \t -\-t '! ---r-l\\li I \L li
Nt I
\
\
\
\
\
\
"\Ar $l
b\
il LI
0
!c
=s;g-q Tg
$q
5S qt0
.!
u
15
T
LOT 7
ll
I
I \
.I
:
I \L +
t\
I
I l.t
{r
I
I
\
t
hElt l.tAtrt H-AOR E EtZ< - \,
,{5't
i--t-
!
LOT 6
0.198 AC.\uh\
nuoerftr
FRIFE ADPI{
Qr
PAA
Or
October 30. 2003
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado USA
81657
Attention: Mr. Warren Camnbell
Dear Warren:
FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE
FOR PETERS CHALBT
2955 BELLFLOWER DRrvE
VAIL. COLORADO
Enclosed are the envelopes for the adjacent properties to the Peters chalet,2955 Bellflower Drive, Vail.
Colorado. These addresses and the roll numbers were obtained from the Eagle County Assessors office.
We have placed the address on the envelopes. the actual roll numbers are on the attached sheer.
As we cannot get US postage in Canada, we have aftached a cheque to cover the cost of the postage
required.
We trust this meets with your approval. please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Yours
Peter Archer & Associates, Architect
Architect, Urban & Regional Planners, Proiect Managers
78A Mulcaster Street, Barrie, Ontario, L4M 3M4
Phone: (705) 7 35-5544 Fax: (705) 735-9541 E-Mail: parcherassociates@rogers.com
PAA
Oclober 17. 2003
Town of Vail
75 South Frontagc Road
Vail. Colorado LJSA
8 r6s7
Attention: Mr. Warrcn Campbell
Deai Sir:
RE: FRONTYARDSETBACKVARIANCE
FOR PETERS CHALET
2955 BELLFLOWER DRIVE
vAlL, coLoRADo
Attached is the rcrnainder of our application for a variance ior thc Peters Chalet. 2955 Bellflower l)rive"
Vail. Colorado.
Included in this package arc thc following:
I . Cheque in the amount of $500.00 US for application fee
2. Written description ofthe nature ofthe variancc requested
3. Written Statenrent addressing conccrns of the Municipaliq
4. 4 sets of Proposed Site and Grading Plans
5. 4 sets of Architectural Flool Plans
6. 4 sets of Architectural Elevations
7. All plans reduced to an 8 %" x I l'' format
8. Completed Application for a Variance
1'he following infbrmation requestcd as pan of the application tlrat you already have otr file are:
I . Title Report
2 Starnped Topographic Report
The stanrped" addressed envelopes are being sent at the same time under separatc cover.
Peter Archer & Associates, Architect
Architec! Urban & Regional Planners, Proiect Managers
78A Mulcaster Street, Barrie, Ontario, L4M 3M4
Phone: (705J 735-9544 Fax: (705J 735-9541 E-Mail: parcherassociates@rogers.com
We trust this meets with your approval and should you have any further queries or need anything
further. please do not hesitate to contact the undersisned.
TES LTD.
Peter Archer & Associates, Architect
Architect, Urban & Regional Planners, Project Managers
78A Mulcaster Strcet, Barrie, Ontario, L4M 3M4
Phone; (fu5) 735-9W Fax: (705) 73r95/l1 E-mail: parcherassociates@rogers.com
PAA
Septembei 15,2003
gd-sauRlER
]'c wn of Vail
75 Sorr'Jr Frontage Road
Vaii. Clc,lorado
t.i5A 8165?
Aqgntion: Ms. Allison Aochs
Planner Il
Dear Allison.
PROJECT: PETERSCHALET
BELLFLOWER ROAD
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO
As you are aware, we are resubmitting the original design drawings submitted to the Design Review Board for a
revision to .Jre approved design. Specifically, we are requesting a revision to the approved area and the elevations.
A revised loc/building analysis has been included on the site ptan beside the original lot analysis for your
r eference.
We are proposing is a revision to the floor area on the 2d floor front of the chalet. The original design. approved
bv the l)esim Review Board, had the first 5 %'of the 2no floor of the existing chalet being removed with a new
eiterior 2"d ]loor wall of the chalet being recessed from the original chaler wall below. This provided a horizontal
break in the existing building.
While my client, Mr. Peters, was very happy with this change it has, however, proven to be a very expensive
proposition requiring significant change to the roof and as well, requiring significant work on the existing walls
directly down to the fbundation and in the occupied internal areas in order to provide proper bearing for this new
wall. This portion or'the renovation is very intnrsive into the existing residence aod the EHU below and is also
quite costly.
Our client is hoping that the existing 2nd floor wall at the front of the chalet, which is existing, can remain in place
as well as the existing roof structure. This will have the effect of lowering the eave. We have reviewed the design
and are submitting it for yow review. In our opinion, this change, although adding somewhat in terms of square
area to the front of the existing chalet is simply keeping the existing area. ln terms of aesthetics it is a very minor
and in no way compromising revision.
In our original application, we did not use all ofour allowable square footage. This new 2d floor area" that we are
now requesting your permission for, would have put us approximately 13.4 s.f. over the allowable' As a result we
have adjusted the new addition at the rear of the chalet to bring us in line with the allowable square footage' This
proposed revision does not put us over the allowable squere footage.
Peter Archer & Associates, Architect
Architect, Urban & Regional Planners, Proiect Managers
78A Mulcaster Street, Barrie, Ontario, L4M 3M4
Phone: (705) 735-9544 Fax: (705) 735-9547 E-Mail: parcherassociates@rogers.com
Associated with this change is a revision to the front ofthe new master bedroom over the garage. Your original
analysis requested that the frontofthe garage be backed away from the front of the chalet to:
a) Prov ide reliefalong tbe front ofthe chalet.
b) To bring it more into line with the existing byJaw. As you can see fiom the enclosed front elevation, if we
are to maintain a reasonable or similar roof line to that approved previously, this will result in this wall being
moved forward approximately l' - I1". The implication to the gtoss floor area behind this change is an
additional 98.68 ft.'?.
The lot anall'sis on the site plan tabulates the additional area and the implications to the approved square footage.
If you refer to the electrorric file which we have sent you, Drawing No. A3 REV, you will notice the additional
aria to the front of the chalet shown in grey shading. We are referring you to the electronic file as this shaded area
has been blocked out from printing on the hard copy.
The second change is the addition of a dormer and window over the existing dining room, the deletion ofthe large
rear gable and as well, the construction of a new bath in the existing floor plate above the existing kitchen. A
window and a dormer have been added on the 2d floor, north elevation, facing the creek
The other change that was initiated was with regard to the north elevation. The original elevation approved by the
Design Review Board had a substantial large gable across a portion of this elevation. This gable has been deleted
with instead a simple shed roof which is actually a continuance of the existing roof slope being installed. Again,
this is for cost savings and as well in our opinion aesthetically is better than the original gable design.
We trust the above is self explanatory and should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contacl
the rrndersigned.
ASSOCIATES LTD.
Electronic file Emailed
(Vail ltr.)
Peter Archer & Associates, Architect
Peter/Archer, B. Arch., O.A.A.
Encs.
Architect, Urban & Regional Planners, Proiect Managers
Barric, Ontario, L4M 3M4
Fax: (705) 735-9il7 E-mail: parcherasscrciates(orogers.com
78A Mulcaster Strcct.
Phone: (705) 735-9W
Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 97O.479.2139 fax: 97 O.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co. us
General I nformation:
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please
refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannol be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The
proiect may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within
one year of the approval.
Description of the Request:Please refer to letter attached.
Location of the Proposal: Lot: 6 Block: 6 Subdivision: Vail rntermountain Dev S
Physical a667ses; 295 e11f1ower Dr ive, Vail
Parcef No.: 21031430'7007- (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
nl.
Zoning:
Name(s) of Owner(s): A1a n and Francine Peters
Mailing Addre$s: 20 ol-d Forest Hill Road, Toronto, Ontario
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Appllcant:Peter Archer & Associates l,i:d.
Mailing Address:7BA Mulc ster Street, Barrie, ontario
Canada T,4M 3M4 Phone: (7O5 ) 735-q544
E-mail Address: /Fax:(70s ) '735-954r
pa rcher . pa i-cher@rogers . com
Type of Review and Fee:. Signs . Conceptual Review
. New Construclion . Addition
. Minor Alteration
(multiJamily/commercial)
. Minor Alteration
(single{amily/duplex)
\-.'dffenoes to ADoroved Plans V
. Separation Request
^-o {'
$so Plus $1 .00 per square foot of total sign area.
No Fee
$650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.
$300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
$250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the
Design Review Board
No Fee
For Office Use Only:
Fee Paid: _ Check No.:
Application Date:
Planner:
O
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
974-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
www.ci.vail. co.us
February 7,2002
Dominic Mauriello
PO Box 2658
Edwards, CO 81632
Fax: 926-7576
RE: Proposed addition and remodel at 2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail lntermountain
Dear Dominic:
The Design Review Board voted to approve the request for an addition and remodel for the
Peters Chalet, located at 2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain wilh the
Iollowing conditions:
1. That the applicant continue the stone around the east elevation of the structure,
stepping down, and dying it into grade prior to the first window.2. That the applicant submit revised drawings for the window configuration for the
east elevation, subject to staff review and approval.3. That a Type I EHU deed restriction by recorded with Eagle County prior to
issuance of a building permit.4. That the applicant submit a revocable right-of-way permit for all improvemenls
located in the drainage easement and right-of-way prior to submittal of the
building permit.
Staff has some concern regarding the height of the building. The highest point of the structure
is at exactly 33 ft. Any deviation from the elevation indicated on the roof plan will result in a
zoning violation. I would highly recommend dropping that ridge to 32.75 ft. to allow for some
error in construction. ILC's will be required at foundation and framing to verify. Should you
have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contacl me at 479-2369.
Sincerely,
Allison Ochs, AICP
Planner ll
Town of Vail
{5 "n"'*"*
TOI4'NM
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Depaftment of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, C.olorado 81557
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co,us
Project ltlame: Peters Chalet DRB Numben DR8020027
Proiect Description:
remodel/addition to existing residence
Pafticipants:
OWNER Alan And Francine Peters 0210712002 Phone: 416-488-2870
20 Old Forest Hill Rd
Toronto
Ontario Canada M5p2p7
License;
APPLICANT Dominic Mauriello AU07l20AZ Phone: 925-7575
PO Box 2658
Edwards, CO 81632
License:
Project Address; 2955 BELLFLOWER DR VAIL Location:
Legal Description: Lot: 5 Block: 6 Subdivision: VAIL INTERMOUNTAIN DEV S
Parcel Number: 210314307007
Comments:
BOAR,D/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Clark Brittain Action: APPROVED
Second By: Andy Blumetti
Vote: 4-0 Dateof ApptovaF a2l07Aao2
Conditions:
Clnd:8
(PIAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond:0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building, Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: CON0005179
That the applicant continue the stone around the east elevation
Cond: CON0005180
That the applicant submit revised drawings for the window configuation on east
elevation
Cond: CON0005181
That a Type I deed restriction is filed prior to BP issuance
Cond: CON0005182
That the applicant submit a revocable
O
DRB Fee Paid: $O.OO
o
Ochs Planner: Allison
DES]GN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
Wednesday, February 6, 2002
3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS
PUBLIC WELCOME
PROJECT ORIENTATION / LUNCH - Community Development Department
MEMBERS PRESENT
Clark Brittain
Hans Woldrich
Andy Blumetti
Charles Acevedo
SITE VISITS
MEMBERS ABSENT
Bill Pierce
12:00 pm
2:00 pm
1.
z-
3.
4.
5.
b.
7.
Driver:
Cummings residence - 5135 Main Gore Drive
McDonald's - 2171 N. Frontage Rd.
Peters residence - 2955 Bellflower
Hagerman residence - 1794 S. Frontage Road
Vail Amoco - 934 South Frontage Road
Marriott - 715 West Lionshead Circle
Village Center Building C - 124 Willow Bridge Road
Allison
PUBLIC HEARING - TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Hagerman residence DRB02-0019
Conceptual review of a new primary/secondary residence.
1794 S. Frontage Road/Lot 2, Vail Village West Filing No. 2.
Applicant: Philip & Jocelyn Hagerman
CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE
Cummings residence DR802-0005
Final review of a new residence.
5135 Main Gore Drive/Lol27,Yall Meadows 1"'Filing
Applicant: Greg Cummings
MOTION: Charles Acevedo SECOND: Hans Woldrich
Bitl 2.
VOTE:4-0
3:00 pm
George
Allison
TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 20, 2OO2
3. Peters Chalet DRB00-0028
Final review of remodel/addition.
2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6. Block 6. Vail Intermountain
Applicant:Alan and Francine Peters, represented by Braun Associates
MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Andv Blumetti VOTE: 4-0
CONSENT APPROVED
T
4. McDonald's DRB02-0004 Allison
Final review of a cash window addition and landscape change
2171 North Frontage Rd. / Lot 2-8, Vail Das Schone Third Filing
Applicant; Bill Robinson
MOTION: Charles Acevedo SECOND:Andy Blumetti VOTE: 4-0
APPROVEO WITH 4 CONDITIONS:
1. That there be no tree removal.2. That the flag pole be relocated.3. That the distance between the cash window and the menu box be 20'.4. That a trash enclosure be built at a later date.
5. Marriott Vail Mountain Resort DRB02-0008 George
Conceptual review of Phase ll lmprovements.
715 West Lionshead Circle/Lots C&D, Morcus Subdivision and Lots 4&7, Block 1
Vail Lionshead 3'd Filing.
Applicant: Vail Resorts
CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE
6. VailAmoco DRB02-0023 George
Conceptual review of proposed new signs and exterior modifications.
934 South Frontage Road/Unplatted, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Applicant: Gordon Sign
CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE
7. Village Center Building "C' DRB02-0011 Bill
Final review of orooosed exterior modifications
124 Willow Bridge Road/Lot C&K, Block 5E, VailVillage 1'l Filing
Applicant; Village Center Condominium Association, represented by Fritzlen Pierce
MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND:Andy Blumetti VOTE: 4-0
GONSENT APPROVED WITH 1 GONDITION:
1. That the belly band application matches the band on the existing buildings.
8. Pearson Residence PRJ02-0014. George
Conceotual review of remodel.
303 Gore Creek Drive, Units 24 & 2C, Vail Rowhouses/Lot 2, Block 5, Vail Village 1s'Filing.
Applicant Vicki Pearson
CONCEPTUAL _ NO VOTE
L Donovan Park DRB02-0014 George
Final review of proposed changes to approved plans to allow for a change in the garden wall
fence design and the roof material of the restroom.
Unolatted
Applicant: Town of Vail
MOTION:Andy Blumefti SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE:3-0
10. Meadow Drive Streetscape Master Plan George
Conceptual review of the draft streetscape master plan for Meadow Drive Applicant: Town of Vail
CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE
Staff Denials
Safeway DRB02-0009. Atlison
Wrap facia & soffit with sheet metal.
2'171 N. Frontage Rd. WesVLot 3, Vail das Schone Filing 3.
Applicant: Soldoff Development
Staff Approvals
Lipnick residence DRB02-0013. Allison
Change/Addition/250 and interior conversion.
1255 Westhavefr Circle/Lot 45, Glen Stream 45.
Applicant: Robert & Janie Lipnick, represented by Steven James Riden A.lA.
Lee residence DRB02-0007. Allison
Garage conversion and window addition.
2972 Bell'flower Drive/Lot 14. Block 6. Vail lntermountain.
Applicant: Brian & Nancy Lee
Tytel residence DRB02-0016. Allison
Change deck door, window addition and addition of AC unit.
174 E. Gore Creek Drive, Units 526 & 528/Lot A, Lodge at Vail.
Applicant: Howard & Sandra Tytel
Ultimate Vacation DRB02-0006. Bill
Awning sign and window graphics.
143 E. Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village 1" Filing.
Applicant: Ann Egan
Pollack residence DRB02-0010. Bill
Change to approved plan.
1250 Westhaven Circle/Lot 30, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: Ron & Mimi Pollack
Timber Falls Building 19 DRB01-0414 Bill
Concrete slab for portable hot tub.
4469 Timber Falls Court, building 19/Timber Falls Condominiums.
Applicant: Timber Falls Condo Association
Mountain Bell Qwest Tower DRB02-0018. Allison
Re-roof.
160 Mountain Bell Road/Unplatted, Mountain Bell.
Applicant: US West Communications, Inc.
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development
Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign f anguage interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356,Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
I gnrzmR.A[-]f.i ASSocil,\]-lES, ll NC"
Re:
PLANNING and COMI'4UNlTY DEVELOPI"IENT
December 11,2001
Allison Ochs
Planner 2
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re-submittal of DRB Plans for Allan Peters - 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail
Intermountain
Dear Allison:
I am submitting to you rcvised DRB plans for the Peters Chalet on Bellflower. These plans reflect the
changes made and approved by the PEC in review of the variance request earlier this year. Material
samples and colors have not been provided and will be provided prior to any hearing with the DRB.
Since Mr. Peters and his architect will be traveling here from Canada to attend the DRB meeting, please
let me know the meeting date for this project ASAP so that they can make flight arrangements. Mr.
Peters is anticipating a final review of the project.
On March 26,2000 the PEC approved the variances we requested (9.5' setback on west side, 9' on the
front, 1 1.9' on the east side, and parking in the nght-of-way). Two conditions were included with that
approval; provide a landscape plan with buffering to neighbor and that a revocable right-of-way permit be
obtained prior to a building permit being issued. The plans remain unchanged liom the PEC approval and
since Town staff reviewed our plans at that time, I would not anticipate many issues arising.
Let me know if there are additional materials needed for this review. IfI can be ofadditional assistance.
please do not hesitate to contact me at 926-7575.
Edwards Village Centei Suite C-209
0105 Edwards Village Boulevard
Post Office Box 2658
Edwards, Colorado 8l 532
Pl't.9749)6.7515
Fax - 970.976.7 57 6
w!wv.bmUnassocrates.com
Oecopr
Deparlment of C ommunity Development
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
March27,2001
Dominic Mauriello
PO Box 2658
Edwards, CO 81632
Fax: 926-7576
RE: Proposed variances at 2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Dear Dominic:
The Planning and Environmental Commission approved the variance requests for lhe Peters
Chalet, located at 2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain with the followino
conditions:
1. That prior to final design review approval, the applicant provides a landscape plan which
includes provisions to adequately buffer the surface parking area from adjacenl
properties.
2. That the applicant submit a revocable right-of-way permit for all improvements located in
the drainage easemenl and right-olway prior to submittal ol the building permit.
Please let me know when you would like to return to the Design Review Board for a conceptual
review. The next Design Review Board meeting is scheduled for April 4,2001. should you
have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 479-2369.
Sincerely,
//b-
Allison Ochs
Planner ll
Town of Vail
$'"n""o'o'"*
o
PLANN
(
)r -\
MEMBERS ABSENT
Chas Bernhardt
\
11:00 am
12:15 pm
1.
2.
4.
5.
Okubo residence - 5027 Ute Lane
Vail Mountain School - 3160 Katsos Ranch Road
Tang residence - '185 Forest Road
Cascade Hotel - 1295 Westhaven Drive
Peters residence - 2955 Bellflower Drive
Brandess Building -2077 N. Frontage Road
Driver: Brent
rex
ING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COM
PUBLIG MEETING RESULTS
Monday, March 26,2001
PROJEGT ORIENTATION / - Community Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME
o
MtsstoN
MEMBERS PRESENT
Diane Golden
Brian Doyon
John Schofield
Doug Cahill
Galen Aaslen
Site Visits :
NOTE: lf the PEC hearing extends unttl 6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m.
Public Hearinq - Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm
l. A request for variances from Section 12-6D-6 (Setbacks) and Title ''l4 (Development Standards-
locating required parking in the Right-of-Way), to allow for a residential addition and remodel
located at 2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Alan Pelers, represented by Braun Associates Planner: Allison Ochs
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Diane Golden VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS:
1. fiat prior to final design review approval, the applicant provides a landscape plan which
includes provisions to adequately buffer the surface parking area from adjacent
properties.
2. That the applicant submit a revocable right-of-way permit for all improvements located
in the drainage easement and right-of-way prior to submittal of the building permit.
2. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for a Type ll Employee Housing Unit (EHU),
located at 185 Forest Road/Lot 26, Block 7, Vail Village 1"' Filing.
Applicant: Oscar Tang, represenled by Ray Nielsen, AIA Planner: Ann Kjerulf
MOTION:John Schofield SECOND: Doug Cahill VOTE: 5-0
rf o
CONDI APPROVEDWITH 1 TION:
J.
I . Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Community Development Department shall
receive proof from the applicant that a Type ll Restrictive Covenant has been recorded
with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorde/s Office, thereby ensuring that the employee
housing unit will be permanently restricled for employee housing.
A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for a Type ll Employee Housing Unit (EHU),
located at 1552 Matterhorn Circle/Lot 2, Timber Vail Subdivision.
Applicant: RanchCreekDevelopment Planner: Bill Gibson
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Diane Golden VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS:
1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a Type ll EHU deed
restriction to the Town of Vail Department of Community Development, This document
shall be recorded at the Eagle County Clerk and Recorde/s Office and will require that
the employee housing unit be permanently restricted for employee housing.
2. The Conditional Use Permit for the proposed EHU is contingent upon Design Review
approval.
A request for a variance from Section 12-6C-6 of the Vail Town Code, to allow for a
proposed addition in the rear setback, located at 5027 Ute Lane/Lot 31 , Vail Meadows Filing
1.
4.
Applicant: T. Larry & Renee Okubo Planner: Bill Gibson
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Doug Cahill
APPROVED WITH 2 GONDITIONS:
VOTE:5-0
c
1. That the applicant submit a site-specific geological investigation, completed
by a professional geologist or registered professional engineer, to the Town
for review and approval prior to final Design Review approval.2. That the proposed addition shall comply with Design Standards.
A request for a variance from Section 12-7D-5 of the Vail Town Code, to allow for the
addition of mechanical equipment within the required rear setback at the Brandess Building,
located al2O77 N. Frontage Rd./Lot 39A, Buffehr Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Jayne Brandess lnevocable Trust, represented by Abacus Communications Planner: Allison Ochs
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: John Schofield VOTE: 5-0
DENIED
A request for a modification to an existing conditional use permit to allow for the use of two
modular classroom units at Vail Mountain School, located at 3160 Katsos Ranch Road / Lot
12, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing.
Applicant: Vail Mountain School Planner: Brent Wilson
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Doug Cahill
APPROVED WITH 4 GONDITIONS;
6.
VOTE: 4-0 (Doyon recused)
1. That both modular classroom units will comply with all town design guidelines, be
painted to match the existing school building (beige base with brown trim) and that
additional landscaping for buffering will be added surrounding the new structure.
These issues are subject to review and approval by the Town of Vail Design Review
Board.
2. lf any revisions are proposed to ihe existing approved "Phase l" or "Phase ll"
development plans for Vail Mountain School (approved April 24,20OO) prior to the
commencement of construction, the applicant shall return to the Planning and
Environmental Commission and Design Review Board for review and approval of the
amended development plan.
3. That the conditional use permit for both temporary structures shall expire on May 31,
2003. However, if a building permit has not been issued for lhe construction of the
approved development plan for the school by June 1,2OO2, this conditional use
permit will expire on that date.
4. The existing mechanical equipment behind the school must be screened during the
summer ot 2001 , subject to review and approval by the Town of Vail Design Review
Board.
7. A request for a conditional use permit, to amend an existing conditional use permit, to allow
for one additional Fractional Fee Club unit, located at Vail Mountain Lodge, 352 E. Meadow
Drive/Part of Tract B, Vail Village 1$ Filing.
APPROVED
8. A request for a recommendation to lhe Town Council on a zoning code text amendment to
Section 12-7H-7, (Exterior Alterations or Modifications), to correct an eror in the prescribed
procedure for certain types of Design Review applications for properties in the Lionshead
Mixed-Use 1 Zone District.
Applicant: Braun Associates, Inc.Planner: George Ruther
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: Doug Cahill
Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: George Ruther
MOTION: Doug Cahill SECOND: Brian Doyon
VOTE:5-0
VOTE:5-0
9.
APPROVED
A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, to allow for the construction of Phase
I of Donovan Park improvements, generally located southeast of the intersection of
Matterhom Circle and the South Frontage Road.
Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: George Ruther
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 9, 2OO1
A final review of a request for a recommendation to the Town Council for a rezoning from
Agriculture and Open Space to Primary/Secondary Residential and a Minor Subdivision to
creale two residential lots and a request for a recommendation to the Town Council. for an
amendment to the Vail Land Use Plan changing the land use designation from Public/Semi-
Public use to Low Density Residential, located at 3160 Booth Falls Road/Part of Lot 12,
Block 2, Vail Village 12rh
-Filing.
10.
o
represented by Applicanl: BoothfallsHomeownelsAssociation,Planner: Russell Fonest
Braun Associates, Inc-
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 9, 2OO1
11. A request for a variance from Section 12-7H-10 of the Vail Town Code, to allow for an
proposed addition in the rear setback, located at 660 West Lionshead Place/Lot 1, Vail
Lionshead 1"' Filing, 1"' Addition.
Applicant: Lions Square Condo Association Planner: Bill Gibson
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 23,2001
12. A request for a worksession to discuss a proposed special development district to allow for
lhe construction of a new conference facility/hotel; and a final review of conditional use
permits to allow for the construction of fractional fee unils and Type lll employee housing
units at 13 Vail Road / Lots A, B, C, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 2.
Applicant: Doramar Hotels, represented by the Daymer Corporation Planner: Brent Wilson
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 23,2001
13. A request for a major amendment to Special Developmenl District #4, to allow for the
conversion of an exisling indoor tennis court to a spa, located at 1295 Westhaven
Drive/Cascade Village.
Applicant L-O Vail Hotel Inc.Planner: Allison Ochs
WlTHDRAWN
14. Approval of March 12,2001 minutes
15. Information Update
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planne/s office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notjfication. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the
Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
ffi-'J,fun
Lil rn*
5"0
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
u.
March 26. 2001
A request for variances from Section 12-6D-6 (Setbacks) and Title 14
(Development Slandards- locating required parking in the Right-of-Way), to
allow for a residential addition and remodel located at 2955 Bellflower Dr. /
Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Alan Peters, represented by Braun Associates Planner: Allison Ochs
BACKROUND OF THE SUBJECT PROPEFTY
In June of 1978, a building permit was issued by Eagle County to build a single-family house
on Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain. This neighborhood was subsequently annexed by lhe
Town of Vail. The house is nonconforming with regards to setbacks and lot size. In 1983,
lhe owner of Lot 6 received approval to conslruct a secondary unil on the lot. Al the time,
the regulations required that 50% of the required parking be enclosed. The applicant
recelved a variance from this requirement. The variance was granted based on the difficulty
of building a garage on the site, specifically the Planning and Environmental Commission
found, "the garage would tend to overcrowd the lot and would impair the common open
space between the residence and the residence 10 the west."
The applicant originally appeared before the Planning and Environmental Commission on
February 12,2001. The applicant has since reduced the extent of the variances requesled
(see below).
DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The current owner, Alan Peters, originally submitted an application for a site coverage
variance, a GRFA variance, and front and side setback variances. Recent changes in the
Town's EHU regulations made the site coverage variance unnecessary. In addition, the
applicant has wilhdrawn the request for the GRFA variance. However, the applicant is still
requesting the front and side yard setback Variances, and has added a request for a
variance from the requirement that all required parking be located on-site.
The applicant's entire letter describing the request has been attached for reference, as have
reductions of the proposal. The descriptions of the variances requested are as follows:
1. Front Setback: The applicant is requesting a variance to allow for a front
selback of 9 ft. The proposal includes approximately 113 sq. ft. of GRFA in the
1il.
o
front setback and approximately 101 sq. ft. of the garage within the front setback.
2. Side Setback (west): The applicant is requesting a side setback variance to
allow for a west Side setback of 9.5 ft. The proposal includes approximately 151
sq. ft. of GRFA and approximately 23 sq. ft. of the proposed garage in the west
setback.
3. Side Setback (east): The applicant is requesting a side setback variance to
allow for an east side setback ol 11.9 ft. The proposed addition on the east side
of the structure would allow an additional 9 sq. ft. of GRFA in east side setback. This
setback is currently non-conforming, with a setback of 11.8 ft. and approximately 230
sq. ft. of GRFA in the side setback.
4. Parking in the right-of-way: The applicant is requesting a variance from the
requirement that all required parking must be located on site. The residence
requires a total of 3 parking spaces (2 for primary and 1 for EHU). One of the
parking spaces encroaches up to 9 ft. into the right-ol-way.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends approval of the requested setback
and parking localion variances subject to the criteria outlined in Section Vl of lhis
memorandum and the following findings:
1 That the granting of lhe variances does not conslitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistenl with the limilations on other properties in the Primary/Secondary
Residential Zone District.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
That the strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the setback regulalions results
in a practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
development objectives of the Town Code or the Primary/Secondary Residential
Zone District.
4. That the strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive
the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other propefiies in the same
district.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the variance
requests, the following condition must be met:.
1. That prior to final design review approval, the applicant provides a landscape plan
which includes provisions to adequately buffer the surface parking area from
adjacent properties.
2. That the applicant submit a revocable right-of-way permit for all improvements
located in the drainage easement and right-of-way prior to submittal of the building
z_.
J.
permit.
IV. REVIEWING BOARD ROLES
A. The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for evaluating a
proposal for:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses ' and structures in the vicinity.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility
and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the
objectives of this Title without grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and lraffic lacilities, public facilities and utilities,
and public safety.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the
proposed variance.
B. The DRB has NO review authoriV on a variance, but must review any accompanying
DRB application.The DRB is responsible for evaluating the DRB proposal for:
1. Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings 2. Fitting buildings into landscape 3. Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography 4. Removal/Preservation of trees and native vegetation 5. Adequate provision for snow storage on-site 6. Acceptability of building materials and colors 7. Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms 8. Provision of landscape and drainage 9. Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures 10. Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances
1 |. Location and design of satellite dishes 12. Provision of outdoor liohtino
V. ZONING STATISTICS
Staff has reviewed the proposal according to the Primary/Secondary Zone District and the
survey submitted. The analysis provides the following:
Lot Size: 8,624.8 sq. ft. / 0.198 acres Zoning: Primary/Secondary Residential Hazards: none
Standard
GRFA:
Primary
EHU
Garage
Setbacks:
Front:
Sides:
Rear:
Site Coverage:
Allowed
4,803 sq. ft.
2,831 sq. ft.
1 ,175 sq. ft.
900 sq. ft.
20 fr.
15 ft. (east)
15 ft. (west)
15 ft.
2,156 sq. ft. (25%.)
Existino
2,458 sq. ft.
1,631 sq. ft.
827 sq. ft.
n/a
14.4 ft.
11.8 ft.
20.5 ft.
59 ft.
Proposed
3,619 sq. ft.
2,723 sq. ft.
821 sq. ft.
244 sq. ft.
9 fr.
11.9 ft.
9.5 ft.
51.5 ft.
1,118 sq. ft. (13%) 2,053 sq. ft. (25%)
vt.
'Because there is a Type I EHU on the site, site coverage is increased to 25% o{ total lot area.
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
A. Consideration of Factors Reqardinq the Variances:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and struclures in the vicinity.
Setbacks:
As requested by the Planning and Environmental Commission at the
February 12, 2001, meeting, the applicant has.increased the setback from
the west property line to a minimum of 9.5 ft. This includes 151 sq. ft. of
GRFA and 23 sq. ft. of garage in the wesl side setback. Staff believes that
the increase in the setback to 9.5 ft. will allow for additional landscaping, thus
reducing the impact of the proposed addition to other structures in the
vicinity, most notably, the structure to the west.
The front setback has increased to I ft. This includes 1 '13 sq. ft. of GRFA,
which encroaches approximately 5 ft. into the front setback and 101 sq. ft.
of garage. The garage encroaches 11 ft. into the front setback. Due to the
configuration of the righfof-way of this lot, staff believes that there will be
minimal impacts on existing or potential structures in the vicinity.
Parkinq in the rioht-of-wav:
The proposed parking in the right-of-way encroaches up to 11 ft. into the
right-of-way. Due to the configuration of the lot and the applicant's attempt
to minimize the encroachment, staff believes that the proposed parking in the
right-of-way will have no effect on structures in the vicinity.
The degree to which relief trom the strict and literal interpretation and
enlorcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege.
The applicant has revised the plans, minimizing the encroachment into the
front and side setbacks. By designing a one-car garage, the applicant has
3.
increased the west side setback from 3 ft. to 9.5 ft. and the front setback
lrom 8 ft. to 9 ft. Staff does not believe this variance request to be a grant ol
special privilege. The size, configuration, existing structure, and 50 ft. slream
setback are all physical hardships on this lot which greatly restrict the ability
of improvements to be made to lhe structure without a variance. The lot is
nonconforming with regards to lot size and the house currently encroaches
into the fronl and side setbacks. Many of the structures in the neighborhood
have similar encroachments into the setbacks (see below).
The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic f;acilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety,
The modification 1o the proposal has eliminated the structure from the
Location Description of the site
2923 Bellflower Nonconforming 4-plex approved by Eagle County.
Encroaches 9 ft. into the stream setback,7.5 ft. into the
east setback, and encroaches into the riqht-of-wav.
2933 Bellflower No information available.
2943 Bellflower Granted a front setback variance to allow for a front
setback of 13 ft. Side setbacks are nonconformino at 12
ft. and 5 tt.
2953 Bellflower Granted a parking variance to not enclose parking in
conjunction with EHU. Meets all selback requiremenls.
2963 Bellflower Granted setback variances allowing for a 6 ft. front
setback, 6.4 It. east side setback, and 8.4 ft. side setback-
2983 Belltlower No information available.
3003 Bellflower Granted front setback variance to allow tor a 13 ft. tront
setback, with GRFA being allowed beneath the garage.
Side setback variance was denied.
2992 Belltlower Denied (by Council) a side setback variance for garage
and GRFA. Meets all setback reouiremenls.
2982 Bellllower Meets all setback requirements.
2972 Bellflower Meets all setback requirements.
2962 Bellflower No information available.
2852 Bellflower Nonconforming. Encroaches into the front setback I ft.
and 1 ft. into side setback.
2942 Bellflower Granted a front setback variance ,or a garage and storage
area to allow for a 15.5 ft. front setback. Nonconforminq
with a 7 ft. encroachment into the east side setback.
2932 Bellflower Meets all setback requirements.
2995 Basinqdale No information available.
2975 Basinqdale Meets all setback requirements.
2955 Basinqdale Garage located in f ront setback.
2945 Basinqdale Nonconiorming. Encroaches into side setback 7 ft.
2935 Basingdale Granted front setback variance to allow for GRFA below
garage in front setback. Below grade encroachment of
18.5 fr.
2925 Basingdale Granted front setback variance to allow for a front setback
of J3 ft.
existing 5 ft. drainage easement. The Public Works Department will accept
a revocable right-ot-way permit lor the improvements proposed within that
easement and for the parking in the right-otway. Stafl does not believe that
the variance will have a negative elfect on the factors listed above.
The Plannino and Environmental Gommission shall make the followino findinqs
before orantinq a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other orooerties classified in the same
district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or welfare, or materially injurious to propefiies or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more ot the followino reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcemenl of the specitied
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceplions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same zone-
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district.
<=
Eo
q)
-8 o i!
o
(!
o
(!
E a f
th
IE
o
o
a c)f g
o
-E
E c o
g 6 o :J (t o tr
E c (u
r-t-
s g
o -f-J
^g)LL
z\'6
ul u4
\?
F
uR
*R
H*
$a
HU
co$
N
6
(f,id
ffiffiffiil
ti lt
!ljl
I l{'
3!i
ilil,
rliri I
T t
i
-.-'T::a *
ai t
8e
zl <t j
0-l
rSl zl
nl
<{
lvl $l
ol tl|l dlla ol;
0-t;ot: r tvl? [rll$ { "tfi j
li 3 iii i iil
J . La ,i ,1./ I: rl 1 i$*i , uil 3i ..r ili ,'i; 1!r
K6 .;e
6idii$
{ifr:gri
li8l'3lry
zl
<TI
dl
'.ll 7l
ol ..{{
ul ,sl
O{u zti Fl:9t;Xi uls
't:j
l9
x
1-
+l
ff|l
lil!l
:33rr ll:t'irilit
gg /
;,t
---1
r-l'
l" -':l
6x I I
L----
I
I
I
I
6x
\
-\\- r -\v .<
i
i
I
a
J
t rl !{
I
i
t I
I Lce 4iE EX 3
E<
FF !
f
a
tt d3
rl
{
<mN
*tEut
&FI E u 4
&tq I-(Ir:I tr<I
f
{-
'ri j
I 1! 8 ,r xi ts t" bF d ? |,$i -$
! a t"r' '"1 i{ ft gn td ..i J{r i! 3i
[b ii.
itrnlt
s ii:$tl
91II,$tl,r
zl <l rl
trt
ol zl
ol <l fll
rJl
r$lil
Zla'
Ft..ol;
ilf,
zl {l JI frl
r-l II
UI
lrri Tl
9la zl.i
oi:JI:
:lti
tlll$
:;
I
f lf
,."., ;i.1 l.rl I I '"i--i--1-r-rr'-,
r-3 i
l__t__
t
(i{!.n $ I !i r i :r tii!i\nr i'lt fi il $[1ir irll , ra ut lin urlll
t
e{ I
,--'
I
I
,F
t\ r Iri tii i\i I
rl{
;ii fui i. t ;lt
tI,r! $ii
,a ll!!l 'rli
I $;lii ?ti
98 l
"" ,'
'---/ ,'"
:l i
9;:l
5x I I
I
I
I
,iili,irliii
E(;;fltl:-,1 : i :;lr.Pl qr'li,
6i ;^!J.i;!: tu:it
i5,:lLt3!!!l tlat:!
ll6!ilirli!;[!!iFr
(
TS.
i ;:-i ! Ail
-,ii *iii{insi
lit: ii t,d, iti i
fliill diildili$ I
*lt
'1,,
ll
llr
iIx
,li*
t
t t
t
/-,
IC
-E;
96 d
E<F:^-:
=t
&fi!Fl il t Hr I O ,!lii Z ii"l d iil,l
H <ml
Eq <lf'llll A A,IL\LZ{
I ,
!
t
F l:6d t <i R (< !rP 11 fiE S g.v
it tg la ir ;! 33
[b .;l
itr t3l !tFUr!
ii !t6tt$
zl <li'
dl:
Pli
(ol$
v
ty
o
u
o J :
-l lr.l 0
$
te
,/\
I
I {1 ,:!'i ;p
zi:
;,1$0[
$l:fff
!ls!{l,l ,_ E6
0lltt
6ltsrx
e8 I
---j v ','
tll U-t
e" il
(, I
5,(
v
N
a
u
4r
()
u'
-_t
rrr llll
'0 \51 {l
ul
ot l-lil ot:
3l:
Ol,i
714 ol8
NN
.iiirt'lrli
rifti$ltrlr*il
o il;
t;
;li
IE
,1,,
t',
,lli
I t I
I
,i
:
I
t"la2 C 1;E
E<;:
6.- 6 t
t
I
FH
gil
+t ()&
,il
lvl
ul r-l ;:
zli"l
f .i u \f, Vl,
rfl I"l
/'\
I
/
ZI
1l
0_l .l 7l
rul fl tul ol <l
ol
la)
jo i-s t-{
'{,a)
{))
o
_t)\(
.9 J n n
'*lffiliii$
J
?
t t
tst 3 3;E :6 d
.'r x; !
e t1
33
&1 !Hr I u ,iiii q i{I
* ,u,,i
tr <lz'rr\l rtr {ltn-,I a o{l\JL--'ll
a
ri
Jl
(?
r'i
,.,l
9l '.''l i+ylis
6l ,l
fl 3r
mt us
s /\
I
, iiit,i r fiiil
|*i*iffilliffi
o
tit
I I
I
i
i
il
,E i
3;g
trr t
I
Ri
R6
R
]
dfiI iri i! i hrt I
& r;ill
j iiioi
H <rmr rrl <l.f'1i'-l A AiI\JIZI
$
ft
wl
r)l .i
xli vtt ()t .
Jl,i rLl9
rrlii
,ilv
-+,/\
l
t
7l
1I
0_l
0rl
ol
ol ll Itl
ot cl (-.ll
/
F o
o
-o
0)
r0
,lft$ffiriffi
a I
i::
I t l;
4;e 66 .j
s; !
l
-F 6>
R;
I
IZTN
IF2I
&ii t4F
Q 4
4 H<irr<trrA
I
I
;
i
I
l
I
i
I
I 'Zl --- I ot
'-l iFl
' ,al , <t{l r\l
| .-l ; llll ;Jl i url
I -"r- I rl r-l ll r\t \-rl (')l
I
_ii
ii
61
\l \*
r\ I i\i r"\ I..lr I
i\l i\l l)
:fu .Itl
t
I
I
I
\
I
I
,ffi*il*u
rt
il:
;t,
!lr
{li
l:
t
u ll
J
.i tt
!r
i
F: .s
c<
i
z
rr
ffir i +l --!o ,i:lt 4 il;i1 & lifu!
E <IZNI iA <tH-t A/NJLZI
tZl ;ol l-r-l
<t
>l : llll _il , lul rl (j)l
<l
rul
i
il
1{
{l
il
!'
ri
iftmfrlffi
zl
al Fl
il
3t
rul
-l rl t-l
ul
ol
ZI
jj
P.W?/W3
r nNyNR.AL-IN ASSOCIATIES. INC.
97e,41g,e454
o
MAR-al-eaA1 17:58 FROH:BRALJN ASSoCIATES 97A9&1516 Tor o
PIANNING and COHt'ruNlTY DEVELOPMENT <.
March 21.2001
Plarrrring'arrd Environmental Conrmission
'I'own of Vail
75 S. Frontagc Road
vail, CO 81657
Re: Alan Pcters Variance Application - 2955 Belltlower Drive[ot 6, Block 6, Vail Tnterrnounlain
Dear Commission Mcmbers:
Thank you for allowing us an opportrmity to hear your concems nbout Mr- Pcters plans for rcdevclopment
of his home in West Vail. Based on the Commission's comments we havc rcvised thc plans to reflect
direction given by thc PEC at your Fcbruary 12,2001hcaring.
Bclow is r summary of your comments and direction and how whvc addrcsscd ttrose issucs;
r Our previous application rcquested a 3' side sctback on the west side of the lot Tbe PEC
belicvcd that this was too littft: setback and did not allow for adequate scparation from thc
ncighboring residence, We harrc reduced thc scope of thc improvcntrcnt on that portiou of the
home and havc moditied the plans to includc a one-cor garagp whcre a tlrcc.car garage was
previously proposcd. Thc plrns wr:re prcsented to the neighbor and he fbund thc reviscd plans
acccptablc. The redsed plan provides a minipua 6f l0' side rethack
r Our previous application requcsted un I' liont $ctback. Thc PEC ogccd that thc proposed &ont
setback fo,r bodr thc gr;rgc iurd the floor area above wss adequate based on thc subsuirntiirl
sctback to thc cdgc of slreet pawment, The PEC a8reed fhat the propostd sct'back was
cousistcnt with otlrer bomes along this strcct and consistent with othcr variances granted in the
neighborhood- Thc revised plen provides a 9.5' front setbrck or 3l' to tDc edge of street
prvement,
. T.he ca$t sidc sctback rtquest of I |-5' remains unchanged from the p';vious application. 'I his
request maintains the side .setback of thc cxistifl& homc. The IIEC exprcsscd no conccms about
this request rt the last rnceting. Thc PEC also expressed no concems regarding thc front cnry
addirion fo the horne, which eficnrachss into the front setback with GRFA on rhc sccrmd levcl.
4-
Edwards Village L-emer Suhr C-209
Ol05 Edwards Village Bcderard
fost Oftce Box 2658
Edwards" Cololrdo 8 | 612
n\. - ,70126.7515
F* - 97o.r't6.7516
Y6trrr\r.bf.rul'alsDctirtcl,crxn
MFIR-21-8641 17: 58 FROM:BRAUN 9?A9e67516 <.- - TOr97A47g"45e HJJTJ\.
a
P.AA3/6A3
. Thc rcquest lbr: parking in thc nght-of-way remains the same as the previorls lpplication with
two parkurg spaccs ovcrhangrng the iinnt propcrty tine. Thc PEC gcxrerally algccd *rat this
varianoe was waranted as the par(ing sptces wcrc located a disEncc of I I' from the edge of
stfcet pavgmgnL
We believe the proposed modilications rellect thc dircction givcn by thc FEC ;urd address all of the
concems of thc PEC. Wc also helicvc that lho proposcd homs is consisteut with othcr residenccs and
vaf,iaoces Snutod in thc neighborhood and throughout the l'own. We hope that you agtcc and thct you
will approve tle rrariances as proposed
<
<
I tgtrttztg jR.,\utN Assocl,\-l-lEs, ltNC.
PLANNING and COYMUNITY DEVETOPMENT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Braun Associates. lnc. on behalf of Allan Peters
January 22,2001
Variance requests necessary to renovate existing home, located at 2955
Bellflower Dr./Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain Subdivision.
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
Mr. Peters, the owner of the above referenced property, is seeking the following variances in
order to provide an enclosed garage, additional GRFA, and substantially improve the function
and appearance of his home. His requests include:
r A lront yard setback variance to allow the garage and GRFA to encroach from
approximalely 3'to I' in the front setback.
This variance rs necessa4y to canstruct a garage and additional living area on the
property. While the variance would place the garage and pottions of the living area
within the front setback, the c/osest {he structure will be to the edge of the street asphalt
is 30'. The property line on this property as platted jogs to the nofih. Bellflower Drive, as
constructed, did not jog to the north at this location and therefore is located 23' from the
praperty line in the worsf case. This variance would place this home in a location
consisfenf with the location of other structures in the neighborhood and is consistent with
other varianees granted on this street and throughout the neighborhood. This variance is
warranted due to the small size and configuration of the lot, location of the existing
structure, topographic conditions, and in order to achieve consistency and fairness with
other similar sites in the neighborhood and throughout the Town.
o Side yard setback variances to allow a garage, GRFA, on-grade stairs, and deck to
encroach approximately 15'to 5' in the side setback.
These variances are also necessary to construct a garage and additional living area on
the property and allow for adequate access to the EHU. The actual structure will not be
closer that 4' from the side property line, in the worsf case. The impact of the on-grade
sfals on the neighboring propefty is negligible due to the fact that lhe sfalrs are being
placed on-grade and are adjacent to the parking area for the house to the west. The
GRFA encroachment on fhe easf side of fhe house ls a logical extension of the home to
Edwards Village Center; Suite C-209
0 105 Edwards Vi{lage Boulevard
Post Offce Box 2658
Edwards, Colorado 8 | 632
Ph. - 970.926.7575
Fax - 970.926.757 6
wrrvwbraunassociates.com
the north and represents approximately 6 sq. ft. of GRFA. These variances are
warranted due to the narrowness of the site, topography of the site, the presence of Gore
Creek, and the presence of the existing structure on the property, which create a
hardship and make it impractical to construct reasonable additions to this home without a
variance.
. A parking variance to allow two parking spaces to be partially located within the
right-of-way.
This variance ls necessa4y due to the location of the garage relative to the existing
structure, the topography of the lot, and the close proximity of Gore Creek to the north.
The configuration of the Town's right-of-way relative to the placement of the street
pavement a/so creafes a peculiar hiatus between this home and the street. This
variance is warranted due to the presence of the existing structure on the property,
topography of the site, and the presence of the Gore Creek, which create a hardship and
make it impractical to make additions to fhis home without such a variance.
II. BACKGROUND
This home was originally constructed under the jurisdiction of Eagle County. This lot, like most
(if not all) others in this neighborhood, and many others throughout the Town of Vail has been
made nonconforming through the annexation and application of zoning regulations by the Town
of Vail. Lots in this neighborhood and on this street are very small; this lot is 0.198 acres or
8,624.88 sq. ft. The existing home encroaches into setbacks. The existing home is located
11.8' from the east property line, 14' from the front property line (south), and an existing wood
deck is located 1.5' from the west property line.
There is an existing secondary unit on the property. The secondary unit on this property is
currently not deed restricted as an Employee Housing Unit, but as part of this proposal it will be
deed restricted in accordance with Town Code. One of the major benefits of this renovation
proposal is that the Town will be adding an Employee Housing Unit lo its inventory and ihat the
owner is planning to upgrade the size and quality of the EHU making it a very attractive
employee unit. The EHU is proposed to be quite large with an ample amount of storage space
and an enclosed parking space. The existing home, like the neighbor homes, is quite old and is
in need of renovation.
The parking situation on this lot, and in the neighborhood generally, is strained at best. This
proposal creates a three-car garage and parking for 5 vehicles total. The proposal alleviates all
of the parking problems existing on this lot and generally improves the function and aesthetics of
the neighborhood.
There have been many similar variances granted for homes in this neighborhood and throughout
the Town of Vail on lots of less than 15,000 sq. ft. (especially where the request involved
providing a garage). Many setback variance requests have been granted forconstruction on
small vacant lots. Attached to this memo, as "Exhibit A' is a list of similar variances granted by
the PEC.
Peters, Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Braun Associates, Inc.
Page 2 of 6
o
ll.OUR REQUEST
We request that the PEC grant approval of the proposed variances subject to the following
findinos:
1.That the granting of the setback variance does not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the
Primary/Secondary Zone District.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would
result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of this title.
The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive
the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same
district.
ilt.CRITERIAANO FINDINGS
Considerailon of Factors Regarding the Setback and Parking Variances:
The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structurds in the vicinity
The proposed variances are consistent with the existing character of the
area, the existing structures in the area, and other variances granted
under similar circumstances in the area and throughout the Town. The
proposed improvements will improve the appearance and functionality of
the site. The site will be upgraded to comply with existing building and fire
codes as well as comply with current design requirements for the
neighborhood.
The degree to which relief from the strict and liieral interpretation
and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity
or to altain the objectives of this title without a grant of special
privilege.
The granting of these variances is consistent with those approved for
similarly situated properties in the Town. The proposed variances are the
minimum necessary to achieve compatibility with other sites and
structures in the neighborhood. No special privilege will be granted with
this approval as shown by the numerous other instances of variances
being granted for similar projects as well as the existence of other
2.
4.
,|
2.
Peters, Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Braun Associates, Inc.
Page 3 of 6
structures in the neighbor that enjoy similar setbacks and parking
conditions.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
The proposal will improve the parking accessibility and availability on this
lot and will improve the overall functionality of the neighborhood by having
vehicles parked in facilities designed and consistent with the Town's
Development Standards Handbook. The proposal will have little, if any,
impact light and air in the neighborhood.
Peters, Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Braun Associates, Inc.
Page 4 of 6
Exhibit A
This is a list of variances granted over the past several years for similarly situated properties
throughout the Town of Vail. This list is not intended to be a comprehensive list of variance
requests, but rather represents 2 or 3 hours of research of the Town's files.
Huerta Residence. 3003 Bellflower Drive (June 28. 1999):
The PEC approved a variance allowing GRFA in the front setback on a vacant lot. A front yard
setback encroachment of 8' was approved.
Vlaar Residence. 2963 Bellflower Orive (October 26. 1992):
The PEC approved a front yard setback variance and a density variance to allow for a GRFA
addition to the home (no garage was part of the request). The approval allowed an
encroachment into the front setback of 14'.
Beck Residence. Bellflower Drive, Lot 2. Block 6-Vail Intermountain (Auqust 14. 19B9);
The PEC approved a side yard setback variance and a stream setback variance to allow the
construction of a deck. The existing home encroaches 9' into the stream setback and 7.5 into
the side setback. The deck encroachment was in addition to these encroachments.
Hilb/Cummings Residence. 2338 Garmish Drive (Mav. 20 1996);
The PEC approved a front yard setback variance to allow GRFA to encroach 20' into the front
setback (on the property line) and a parking variance to allow parking to be located in the Town's
right-of-way.
Watkins Residence. 1799 Sierra Trail (April 8. 1996):
The PEC approved a variance to allow parking located within the Town's righfof-way. The
proposed garage had azero front yard setback.
Phillips Residence,2696 Davos Trail (Julv 12. 1999):
The PEC approved GRFA in the front setback below a garage. GRFA was allowed a 1' setback.
Bresnahan Residence, 4532 Streamside Circle East (December 16, 1996):
The PEC granted a side yard setback variance to allow the addition of a garage. The garage
encroached 10' into the side setback.
Current Residence, 3235 Katso Ranch Road (November 1 1. '1996):
The PEC approved a front yard setback variance for a garage addition. The variance allowed
for a 16'front setback.
Peters, Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Braun Associates, Inc.
Page 5 of 6
Drisko &esidelce. 325 Forest Road (Februarv '12, 1996):
The PEC approved a front yard setback variance for a two-story garage on a new primary
residence. The front yard setback encroachment was approved at 19.5' (or a 6" setback).
Venners Residence,4196 Columbine Drive (June 10. 1996):
The PEC approved a side yard setback variance to allow a garage addition. The garage was
allowed to encroach 7.5' into the side yard setback.
Avlgsworth Residence, 2586 Davos Trail (Seotember 8. 1997)
The PEC approved site coverage and side setback variances to allow for the construction of a
garage addition to the existing residence.
Lashovitz Residence. 1748 Siena Trail (Julv 1997):
The PEC approved site coverage and side setback variances to allow for the construction of a
garage addition to the existing residence.
Tavlor Residence. 2409 Chamonix Road (Mav 1993):
The PEC approved a variance to construct the garage in the front setback (the average slope on
this lot did not exceed 30olo). The PEC also approved a site coverage variance in order to
construct a garage and building connection on the property
Smail Residence, 4238 Nuqqet Lane (September 1992):
The PEC approved side and front yard setback variances in order.to construct a garage and a
GRFA addition.
Testwuide Residence. 898 Red Sandstone Circle (Auqust 1992):
The PEC approved side and front yard setback variances in order to construct a garage addition
to the existing residence.
Stlauss Resi-dence, Lot 47, Vail Villaqe West Filinq No. 2 (1985):
The PEC approved a front yard setback variance and a site coverage variance in order to
construct a new garage. The garage was approved to be located 15' from the front property line.
Peters, Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Braun Associates, lnc.
Page 6 of 6
ry-nd ntnt4t*
I rrer"r "italtjfil;,3un enoe{
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on March 26, 2001, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In
consideration of:
A request for variances from Section 12-6D-6 (Setbacks) and Title 14 (Development Standards-
locating reguired parking in the Right-of-Way), to allow for a residential addition and remodel located
at 2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6. Block 6. Vail lntermountain.
Applicant: Alan Peters, represented by Braun Associales Planner: Allison Ochs
A request for a modification to an existing conditional use permit to allow for the use of two
modular classroom units at Vail Mountain School, located at 3160 Katsos Ranch Road I Lol 12.
Block 2, Vail Village 12rh Filing.
Applicant: Vail Mountain School Planner: George Ruther
A request for a variance from Section 12-6C-6 of the Vail Town Code, to allow for a proposed
addition in the rear setback, located al 5027 Ute Lane/Lot 31, Vail Meadows Filing 1.
Applicant: T. Larry & Renee Okubo Planner: Brent Wilson
A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for a Type ll EHU, located at 185 Forest
Road/Lot 26, Block 7, Vail Village 1"' Filing.
Applicant: Oscar Tang Planner: Ann Kjerulf
A request for a variance from Section 12-7H-10 of the Vail Town Code, to allow for an propose
addition in the rear setback, located at 660 West Lionshead Place/Lot 1, Vail Lionshead 1"1
Filing, l"tAddition.
Applicant: Lions Square Condo Association Planner: Bill Gibson
A request for a Type ll Employee Housing Unit, located at 1552 Matterhom Circle/Lot 2, Timber
Vail Subdivision.
Applicant: RanchCreekDevelopmenl Planner: Bill Gibson
A request for a variance from Section 12-7D-5 of the Vail Town Code, to allow for the addition of
mechanical equipment within the required rear setback at the Brandess Building, located at
2077 N. Fronlage Rd./Lot 39A, Buffehr Creek SubdiVision.
Applicant Jayne Brandess lrrevocable Trust, represented by Abacus Communications Planner: Allison Ochs
A final review of a request for a rezoning from Agriculture and Open Space to
Primary/Secondary Residential and a Minor Subdivision to creaie two residential lots and
a request for a recommendation to the Town Council for an amendment to the Vail Land
Use Plan changing the land use designation from Public/Semi-Public use to Low Density
Residential, located at 3160 Booth Falls Road/Part of Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12'n
Filing.
mwvf,rvAa
Applicant Boothfalls ffo*n"r, Association, represented ryln Associates, Inc.Planner: Russell Fonest
A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, to allow for the construction of Phase I of
Donovan Park improvements, generally located southeast of the intersection of Matlerhom
Circle and the South Frontage Road.
Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: George Ruther
A request for a worksession to discuss a proposed special development district to allow for the
construction of a new conference facility/hotel; and a final review of conditional use permits to
allow for the construction of fractional fee units and Type lll employee housing units at 13 Vail
Road / Lols A, B, C, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 2.
Applicant: Doramar Hotels, represented by the Daymer Corporation
Planner: Brent Wilson
A request for a major amendment to Special Development District #4, to allow for the
conversion of an existing indoor tennis court to a spa, located al 1295 Westhaven
Drive/Cascade Village.
Applicant: L-O Vail Hotel lnc.
Plannen Allison Ochs
A request for a conditional use permit, to amend an existing conditional use permit, to allow for
one additional Fractional Fee Club unit, located at Vail Mountain Lodge, 352 E. Meadow
Drive/Part of Tract B, Vail Village 1"' Filing.
Applicant: Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: George Ruther
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development
Department, 75 Soulh Frontage Road. The public is invited to aitend project orientation and the sile
visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.
Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Departmenl
Published March 9. 2001 in the Vail Trail.
TOW OFVAIL
D epartme nt of C ommun ity Deve lopm en t
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 r 38
FAX 970-479-2452
www. ci. vai l. co.us
February 13,2001
Dominic Mauriello
BAI/Braun Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 2658
Edwards, CO 81632
Fax: 926-7576
rQ{
cop
RE: Peters variance request, located at 2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Dear Dominic:
The Planning and Environmental Commission voted to table the variance requesl for the
addition and remodel located at 2955 Bellllower Dr. / Lol 6. Block 6. Vail Intermountain. The
request was tabled to the February 26,2001, meeting. To remain on that agenda, I must
receive plans no later than 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 15'n.
In general, the Planning and Environmental Commission recognized the need for a variance on
this lot. However, they generally believed that the extent to which the variance was requested
was excessive. Most stated that they would not support a front setback variance for any GRFA
above grade, nor did they believe thal the west side setback was adequate lo buffer the
proposed building from the adjacent property. Some commissioners suggested more creative
solutions, including a shared garage with the property to lhe west. While this is a creative
solution, there are many complicated issues involved and I would recommend that you discuss
this with staff.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 970-479-2369.
Allison Ochs
Planner ll
Town of Vail
{g *r"r"ruo r^r"*
L,r=r MAY AFFEcr rou* r*or.O
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Seclion 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on March 12, 2001, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In
consideration of:
A request for a variance from Section 11-48-3(D) Vail Town Code, to allow for a second building
identification sign, located at 548 S. Fronlage Road/Westwind Condominiums.
Applicant: WestwindCondominiumAssociation,lnc.Planner: Brenl Wilson
A request for a worksession to discuss rezoning from Agriculture and Open Space to
Primary/Secondary Residential and a Minor Subdivision to create two residential lots and a
request for a recommendation io the Town Council for an amendment to the Vail Land Use Plan
changing the land use designation from Public/Semi-Public use lo Low Density Residential,
located at 3160 Booth Falls Road/Part of Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12'h Filing.
Applicant Boothfalls Homeowneds Association, represented by Braun Associaies, Inc.Planner: Russell Fonest
A request for variances from Sestion 12-6D-6 (Setbacks) and Title 14 (Development Standards-
locating required parking in the Right-of-Way), to allow for a residential addition and remodel located
at 2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Alan Peters, represenled by Braun Associales Planner: Allison Ochs
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours in the projec{ planne/s office, located at lhe Town of Vail Community Development
Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site
visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.
Pfease call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published February 23,2OO1 in the Vail Trail.
:a\l - \ottili
t0"tr, -
li -1i 1l/',t a Q'
MEMORANDUM
Plannino and Environmental Commission
tl)
L'7'
ll,'lti\
l,,T['.r -
0Li'{i f i';rt TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
?r,
'-7llu
.. | | lt | , r I
Community Development Department (#ql ,t t,lkl' - l'i{r{ 'lr ti
February 12,2001 'Jil''r: n'lvt'iu"' ii;,:.rl'', lrri\Y''r:y'1
14,,.i^.. r' \.; Li,t'. (,-i,.i l.:lc
A request for variances from Section 12-6D-6 (Setbacks) and Title 14
(Development Standards- locating required parking in the Right-of-Way), to
allow for a residential addition and remodel located at 2955 Bellflower Dr. /
Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Alan Peters, represented by Braun Associales Planner: Allison Ochs
t t \.,t..i.(L-
[.
BACKROUND OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
In June of 1978, a building permit was issued by Eagle County to build a single{amily house
located at Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain. This neighborhood was subsequently annexed
by the Town of Vail. The house is nonconforming with regards to setbacks and lot size. In
1983, the owner of Lot 6 received approval to construct a secondary unil on the lot. At the
time, the regulalions required that 50% of the required parking be enclosed. The applicant
received a variance from lhis requirement. The variance was granted based on the difficulty
of building a garage on the site, specifically the Planning and Environmenlal Commission
found, "the garage would tend to overcrowd the lot and would impair lhe common open
space between the residence and the residence to the wesl."
DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The current owner, Alan Peters, originally submitted an application for a site coverage
variance, a GRFA variance, and front and side setback variances. Recent changes in the
Town's EHU regulations made lhe sile coverage variance unnecessary. In addition, the
applicant has withdrawn the request for the GRFA variance. However, the applicant is still
requesling lhe front and side yard setback variances, and has added a request for a
variance from the requirement that all required parking be located on-sile.
The applicant's entire letter describing the request has been attached for reference, as have
reductions of the proposal. The descriptions of the variances requested are as follows:
1. Front Setback: The applicant is requesting a variance to allow for a front
setback of 8 ft. The proposal includes approximately 120 sq. ft. of GRFA in the
front setback and approximately 170 sq. fi. of the garage within the front setback.
2. Side Setback (west): The applicant is requesting a side setback variance to
allow for a west side setback of 5 ft. The proposal includes approximately 300 sq.
3.
4.
ft. of GRFA and approximately 266 sq. ft. of the proposed garage in the west
setback. Because of the method of determining side setbacks in which side
setbacks are measured from front setback to rear setback, the request is for a 5 ft.
setback. However, the structure is proposed to be within 3 ft. of the west property
line.
Side Setback (east): The applicant is requesting a side setback variance to
allow for an east side setback of 11.5 ft. The proposed addition on the east side
ol the structure would allow an additional 20 sq. ft. of GRFA in east side setback.
This setback is currently non-conforming, with a setback of 1 1.8 ft. and
approximately 230 sq. ft. of GRFA in the side setback.
Parking in the right-of-way: The applicant is requesting a variance from the
reguirement that all required parking must be located on site. The residence
reguires a total of 5 parking spaces (3 for primary and 2 for EHU). Two of the
required parking spaces (40% of the required parking spaces) are located within the
Town of Vail right-o1-way. As proposed, the parking spaces encroach up to 11 ft. in
the right-of-way.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Depanment recommends denial ol the requested setback
and parking location variances subject to the crileria outlined in Section Vl of this
memorandum and the following findings:
1. That the granting of the variances does canstitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with ihe limitations on other properties in the Primary/Secondary
Residential Zone District.
2. That the granting of the variance will be detrimentallo the public health, safety or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the strict literal interpretation or enlorcement of the setback regulations does
not resultin a practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with
the development objectives ol the Town Code or the Primary/Secondary Residential
Zone District.
4. That the strict interpretalion or enforcement of the specified regulation would not
deprivelhe applicant ol privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the
same district.
Should the Planning and Environmental Coinmission choose to approve the variance
request, the tollowing condition must be met:
1. The applicant receives approval for the vacation of the drainage easement by the
Town Council prior to receiving final design review approval. All of the utilities with
rights to the easement must also approve the encroachment into the easement prior
to design review approval.
I It.
IV. REVIEWING BOARD ROLES
A. The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for evaluating a
proposal for:
1. The relationship of the requested variance lo other existing or potential uses
and structures in the vicinity.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility
and unilormity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the
objectives of this Title without grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and tralfic lacilities, public facilities and utilities,
and public safety.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems aoolicable to the
proposed variance.
B. The DRB has NO review authoritv on a variance, but must review any accompanying
DRB application.The DRB is responsible for evaluating the DRB proposal for:
'1 . Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings 2. Fitting buildings into landscape 3. Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography 4. Removal/Preservation of trees and native vegetation 5. Adequate provision for snow storage on-sile 6, Acceptability ol building materials and colors 7. Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms 8. Provision of landscape and drainage L Provision of tencing, walls, and accessory slruclures 10. Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances 11. Location and design of satellite dishes 12. Provision of outdoor lighting
ZONING STATISTICS
Staff has reviewed the proposal according to tfe Primary/Secondary Zone District and the
survey submitted. The analysis provides the following:
Lot Size: 8624.8 sq. ft. / 0.198 acres Zoning: Primary/Secondary Residential
Hazards: none
V.
Standard
GRFA:
Primary
EHU
Setbacks;
Front:
Sides:
Rear:
Site Coverage:
Allowed
4803 sq. ft.
2831.2 sq. ft.
1175 sq. ft.
20 ft.
15 ft. (east)
'15 ft. (west)
15 ft,
Existinq
2458 sq. ft.
1631 sq. ft.
827 sq. ft.
14.4 ft.
11.8 fr.
20.5 ft.
59 ft.
Prqoosed
3619 sq. ft.
2792 sq. ft.
827 sq. ft.
8ft.
11.5 ft.
5 ft.'
s6 ft.
2155 sq. ft. (25%)
vt.
2156 sq. ft. (25%*) 1118 sq. ft. (13%)
'The side setback is measured from the rear setback line to the front setback line. Minimum distance
to the west property line is 3 ft.*"Because there is a Type I EHU on the site, site coverage is increased lo 25o/o al total lot area.
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
A. Consideration of Factors Reqardinq the Variances:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and structures in the vicinity.
Setbacks:
The Community Development Department has requested that the applicant
mainlain a minimum 5 ft. setback from the west property line. As currently
proposed, the building is within 3 fl. of the west property line. Staff believes
that this is lhe minimum setback necessary to prevent detrimental effects on
potential uses and structures adjacent to the property. This 5 ft. minimum
setback will also maintain the existing utility and drainage easemenl along
this property line.
Additionally, a greater setback {rom the west property line will allow for a
reasonable area to landscape and bufler the building from the adjacent
property. As currently proposed, there is no area for landscaping to minimize
the visual effect of the addition on the west. Accordino to the Desion
Guidelines,
Since the major objective of the landscaping is to help reduce the
scale of new structures and ta assist in the screening of structures,
the planting ol large sized plant materials is encouraged.
According to the PrimarylSecondary zone district, an area must be a
minimum of 10 ft. wide to qualify as landscape area. As currently proposed,
staff believes that should the variance be granted, it will have a detrimental
effect on the adjacent property.
Parking in the riqht-of-wav:
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow tor 40"k of the required
parking to be located in the right-of-way. This neighborhood has many
parking problems. Staff believes it would be preferable lo minimize the
parking in the right-of-way. Staff believes thal the granting of this variance
as proposed will have a detrimental effect on the properties in the
neighborhood.
The degree to which reliel from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement ol a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the ob,ectives of this title without a grant of special privilege.
Staff believes that the approval of this request would qualify as a grant of
special privilege. The 20 ft. minimum front setback requirement is uniformly
appfied to all properties in the Primary/Secondary Zone District. While staff
believes that locating the garage in the front setback would be a reasonable
devialion from the 20 ft. minimum setback requirement, the additional GFIFA
above the garage in the front selback is in excess of what is necessary to
achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment arnong sites in the vicinity.
Recent approvals in this neighborhood have required that the 20 ft. front
selback be maintained for GRFA above grade, while allowing for GRFA to
encroach into the setback below grade or beneath the garage. Staff believes
that a similar design is possible on this site. Granting the variance to allow
new GRFA in the front and side setbacks above the garage would be a grant
o{ special privilege.
All required parking musl be located within property boundaries. Staff
believes that the applicant's design of the addition has forced the parking into
the right-of-way, creating a selt-imposed hardship. lf the applicanl designed
the garage to be stepped back from the house, it would minimize the amounl
ol relief needed for required parking in the right-of-way. As currently
proposed, staff believes that the requested deviation is more than is
necessary and would therefore be a grant of special privilege.
Stafl recognizes that there is a physical hardship on this lot due to the
existing structure and the size of the lot, and recognizes the need for a
variance for improvements. The lot is nonconforming with regards to lot size
and the house currently encroaches into the front and side setbacks.
However, staff believes that the extent of the variance requested is
excessive. With minor modifications to the plans, the garage could be
pushed further back on the lot, maintaining a greater setback from the west
property lines, and minimizing the front setback encroachment. In addition,
staff believes that the "unexcavaled crawl space" benealh the garage or the
"open to below space" should r'nstead be used for additional GRFA. The
GRFA above the garage should be eliminated, minimizing the GRFA
encroachment into the front and side setbacks above grade. Staff would
support a variance request which maintained a grealer setback from the west
side propedy line, and eliminated all new GRFA in the front setback, except
that which could be located beneath the proposed garage. Staff believes
that the degree to which the variances are reguested is excessive. To
illustrate, the applicant is proposing approximately 450 sq. ft. of GRFA in the
setbacks, with approximately 230 sq. ft. already located within the setbacks
(non-conforming). This totals 670 sq. ft. of GBFA within setbacks, or 20Y"
of the GRFA of the residence. In addition, approximately 430 sq. ft. of
garage area is proposed to be located within the setbacks. This is
approximately 65% ot the garage sguare footage.
Many lots within this neighborhood are nonconforming or have received
variances. The attached map indicates sites where a variance has been
granted. The table below indicates existing nonconformities and variances
that have been granted:
Location Oescription ol lhe site
2923 Bellflower Nonconforming 4-plex approved by Eagle County.
Encroaches 9lt. into the stream setback, 7.5 ft. into the
east setback, and en$oaches inlo the riqht-of-wav.
2933 Bellflower No inlormation available.
2943 Bellflower Granted a front setback variance to allow tor a front
setback of 13 tt. Side setbacks are nonconformino at 12
ft. and 5 ft.
2953 Bellflower Granted a parking variance to not enclose parking in
coniunction with EHU. Meets all setback requirements.
2963 Bellflower Granted setback variances allowing lor a 6 ft. front
setback, 6.4 ft. east side setback, and 8.4 ft. side setback.
2983 Bellflower No information available.
3003 Bellflower Granted iront setback variance to allow for a 13 ft. front
setback, with GRFA being allowed beneath the garage.
Side setback variance was denied.
2992 Belltlower Denied (by Council) a side setback variance for garage
and GRFA. Meets all setback reouirements.
2982 Bellllower Meets all setback requirements.
2972 Bellflower Meets all setback reouirements.
2962 Bellflower No inlormation available.
2852 Bellflower Nonconforming. Encroaches into the front setback I ft.
and 1 ft. into side setback.
2942 Belltlower Granted a front setback variance for a garage and storage
area to allow for a 15.5 ft. lront setback. Noncontormino
wilh a7 ft. encroachment into the east side setback.
2932 Bellflower Meets all setback requirements.
2995 Basingdale No information available.
2975 Basinodale Meets all setback requirements.
2955 Basinqdale Garage located in front setback.
2945 Basinqdale Nonconlorming. Encroaches into side setback 7 it.
2935 Basingdale Granted lront setback variance to allow for GRFA below
garage in'Tront setback. Below grade encroachment of
18.5 ft.
2925 Basingdale Granted fronl setback variance to allow for a front setback
of 13 ft.
3. The effect ot the requested variance on light and air, distribution ot
population, transportation and traffic tacilities, public facilities and
B.
utilities, and public salety.
The Public Works Department is unwilling to vacate the drainage easement
along the east side of the property, stating that the easement is necessary
for drainage. The proposed parking in the right-of-way also exacerbates an
already difficult parking situation in the neighborhood. The Town of Vail
right-of-way serves as a snow storage area for snow removal from the street,
and eliminating available portions of the right-of-way serves to make snow
storage more difficull.
In addition, Lot 7 (the propefiy to the west of Lot 6) was granted a side
setback variance to allow for an east side setback of 6.4 ft. Should the
setback variance be granted on Lot 6, the building will be within 3 ft. of the
shared property line. Staff believes that this will have a detrimental effect on
light and air for both residences.
The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followino findinos
before qrantinq a variance;
1. That the granting ot the variance will not constitute a grant o{ special privilege
inconsislent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same
dislrict.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or weltare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the followino reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumslances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant ol privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other propefties in the same district.
go
9t
o (E
0,
F
(s
(!
!,
o)f a
o
(U (,
J
o
o
6 f g
(l)5 b c o
E
{r,a o
:]ct o
E,I c $TI f-
s
g,
q)
ru o
LL
^\Z\o
tll,
a
lat
\i
RH
*R
Ho
9E
EO
N oS
N
c) trJ
Peters Variance Supplement
Huerta Residence. 3003 Bellflower Dr.
The variance lhal was approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission allowed only
90 sq. fl. of GRFA beneath the garage.
Vlaar Residence, 2963 Bellflower Dr.
Allowed for approximately .l 10 sq. ft. of GRFA in the tront setback.
Hilb/Cumminos Reddence. 2338 Garmisch Dr.
The lot has slopes greater than 30%, therefore the garage was localed in the front setback. 815
sq. ft. of GRFA was allowed beneath lhe garage. The Planning and Environmental Commission
also found that with the steep slopes, the variance lor parking in the right-of-way was warranted.
Watkins Residence, 1799 Sierra Tr.
The lot has slopes greater than 30%, therefore the garage was allowed in the lront setback.
The Planning and Environmental Commission found that with the steep slopes, the variance for
parking in the right-of-way was warranted.
Phillips Residence. 2696 Davos Tr.
The lot has slopes greater than 30%, therefore the garage was located in the front setback. 874
sq. ft. of GRFA was allowed beneath the garage.
Bresnahan Residence. 4532 Streamside Cr. East
No GRFA was approved in conjunction with a variance granted for a garage.
Current Residence. 3235 Katsos Rangh Rd-
No GRFA was approved in conjunction with at variance granted for a garage.
Drisko. 325 Forest Rd.
The Planning and Environmental Commission found a hardship in the steep slopes off of Forest
Rd. No GRFA was approved in conjunction with the garage, and the applicant actually removed
GRFA from beneath the second garage in the setback as part of the approval.
Venners Residence. 4196 Columbine Dr.
No GRFA was approved in conjunction with a variance granted tor a garage.
Aylesworth Residence, 2586 Davos Tr.
24 sq. ft. of garage was located in the side setback as part of this variance request.
Lashovitz Residence. 1748 Sierra Tr.
No GRFA was approved in conjunction with a variance granted for a garage.
Tavlor Residence, 2409 Chamonix Rgl.
No GRFA was approved in conjunction with a variance granted for a garage.
Smail Residence. 4238 Nuqoet Ln.
348 sq. ft. of garage and377 sq. ft. of GRFA were approved in the setbacks.
Testwuide Residence, 899 Red Sandstone Cr.
1 10 sq. ft of garage in the side setbacks and 10 sq. ft. of GRFA in front setbacks approved.
\#-.
lr
ta l/'
2l <l
_Jl
trl
Fl II
r5l
E al
Hi
-{i .ft{olrl
t lt
r di
7
:
I
$
:
Ei !a
Jls
.ll
r!i
Iri
t i.r
I
J tl
:
;
ir ta
iE $II lI
t
SE
i|ili
7/*
zl .{l
_.I
0_l
rUl
zl
ol <l ul
s]
Pii Ft..qr
il]il
Eit i F' ril
3 iill
E oltmt lq <lFl}-1l l\ Aii\.t-ll
I?
-t e !{o i ri I
Fi EfiT F1
!
ct
il
u (l lr
I
I
F q
14 l {38 :ii E'6 Ht li ,l Ii !E
Sili
!!,;di
HiIiltt
I
V
zl {1 JI ol
'Sl zl
ol {l
ul ,Jl
rTlb
zln
bli xt3 ulr
'!d
zl {1 Jl
trl
r5l
7\
ol {l fll
ul
ol ul
Hli
fli
I
i
F
I
I
t
n
I I
II
IN
!!,i[lii 2i i!t;i Hl I tli rl r
lr{
!_----
L- ---
I
I
I
I
a
tl
,i
r.l
T
a
I
i il
ll II
!
I
Ft €
l'{-5
OE FK He ,{oE s
p
FE
& r Ht' I t rtil u ritll ; lir,r
H <tmt Er <[.1l.ll a< AtL\1,1/l
<i
h!l ll!ul ..Fl l:
6l ii
$|rt
dl eil
\#--
-l-- -l
--n€;l:4$=Fflffi"$ll - _r_ll__/ -\ /
l*-""1#H #ffili ,rL- =v
f /: "',)l ln-lsf'l41 fi i|ilil /
ifr iffis$ ffi-. ry /l'f $ l{ nlH I ,f ll /i"\ l I ll \ti7--v \\l I I il --ft.,-"',"--rr-2iv ll Zil' ll I tl l\ lt,' \ll,/t \)l- --1 rtl
fl r*%-Hl
?a gl i:qE I EE
6t 6 | no'oE I 4x F; *I $F op s I E
9i ri
f{.
fi{
nidffi##
a I I l!I
tl ll
ll
lx it
"t r lrt 6 -'s;, I ot d oE F<
FF i
3 4
14!l
iti:l
<m\i <tt"{-,1 tr{tvl
I il t
d ttl n<()&
&t{
H el
<l
u-l vl \rl .sl:ots
-'1t '
ILI IJ
!l$&u
lt-
il +_+ __l_*--{_ I +#ffiljll_#$l_rF_1.,1 I /
l,l --lfi i+i-- li q $1.ruH'#'# | /lTITFi Erym=;'*ffii 'l l /ll fh #e lHl-ffi*ail I | /
'l
-l tflq$' lffim-Iru'/iri\: il rt
| _+___j=.-\..-.-r | /Ut I I I ll-]il---A , /Lrlll lll I I llH^,Hrl --$i -/llkllll tl I I
1-1r='"'4il13*--pr'1
rn ' Hf" lil Il I <t m-llkmdL--++:-r r ldi t$l
el
ffifriffi
:ftr
zl
al Fl {l
>t
5l
rul
-T1
Fl :fl
01
(f)1
o llj
1 |lr
,II
IU ;l
I
4!
lil
'B
a ?
I
t
I
.tc !.1 o i
5? !
H>KE 3
rq d
F
=
A
&EI
9
&IA t-<Fl A
ru W \M \ l, r'l
\
Hffi[iriil r l
l\WlHlrHffil il l\mfil i\i11ffi=l\ffi
\
i
1
(
!
li l{it ri
:!
!!i5
if
zl
at F]<t
>{
sl
rul
t-- I (f)l {l ul
iinffijjifi
!I *iir {c""r i i! i
zl
al r-l
<t
>l
5i
rrri
TI r-l
ty{
ot zl
i ii :.,:i i:t=';rir r p I
s$ril! N5l
i t,d, g{i I
ffii$iii$i
;:
';P
r$
'JIid
5 ri:
3ir$
9 sd$
a I t
i
3
ts !a
5{C
:FT
u$v r!!d1l
Et*
&tl
ut {l ul ol
5li
3li
ol,r
6l{
t-{ I
IFI tE n
3l ril
isiE
sr tb cl ,l
E[ .- d.ii:itrd
Hili$ll
iu | ; I di l$rlti ll
-1 l- ll'f-:Alql
I t1-edr<r I
</'\
zl {th
dli
Hlr ols
*
I gnrzgR.,\LltN ASSoclt,\tlES, lNC"
PLANNING and COMI"IUNlTY DEVELOPMENT
January 3 1, 2001
Allison Ochs
Planner 2
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Revisions to Peters Plans and Submittal for PEC Review - 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6. Block 6.
Vail Intermountain
Dear Allison:
Included with this letter are three sets (and one reduced set) of revised plans for the Peter's Chalet. These
plans are intended for PEC review of the requested variances. The variances being requested rcmain
unchanged from the previous submittal. We believe the proposed variances are reasonable and consistent
with similar requests approved by the Town. Please refer to the memorandum to the PEC submitted with
our last correspondence. Please also ensure that the PEC members receive this previously submitted
memorandum in their packets.
We have, however. addressed the technical issues as raised in your letter ofJanuary 15. 2001. The items
below address the Town's issues:
Re:
2.
l.We have provided a grading plan to be used for the purpose of measuring building height. Per
staff requiremcnt, we have attempted to "recreate" the grades existing on the property presumably
existing on the property in 1970. You approved this grading plan on January 19, 2001 per a faxed
copy ofthe grading plan.
As per my letter of December 26,2000, we were directed by Tom Kassmel, Project Engineer, to
ref'er to the contour elevation of7,805' as the 10O-year flood plain. 'Ihe plans are clearly marked
showing this contour on the site and grading plans.
3. 'Ihe driveway grade complies with the TOV development standards (detail #4). 'Ihe grade is
indicated on the grading plan.
4. A4' wide concrete pan is indicated on the site p1an.
[dwards Village Cente[ Suite C-209
0 | 05 Edwards Village Boulevard
Post Offlce Box 2658
Edwards, Colorado 8 1 632
Ph. - 9709267575
Fax - 970.926.757 6
wwwDraunassocrateS.com
5. The proposed home continues to encroach on the utilify and drainage easement on the west side
of the property. I have verbal approval liom all utility providers indicating that they currently do
not have utilities in the easement and all are in the process of "quitclaiming" their rights to the
easement to Mr. Peters or executing an encroachment agreement (Eagle River Water and
Sanitation District) allowing the proposed improvements. I have included copies of the
documents secured to-date. As to the issue of drainage, the easement as it exists today does not
contain any drainage structures nor is it currently utilized for drainage purposes. We understand
that the PEC has the right to act upon the proposed variance request, which includes the
encroachment to this easement. Additionally, in order to comply with the building code, no
openings (windows) are proposed on the west elevation of the building closer than 5' to the side
propefy line.
6. The site plan includes a limit of disturbance fence.
7. A landscape plan has not been provided, but will be provided prior to DRB review of the project.
The landscape plan is not necessarily gefinane to the variance requests.
8. A note has been placed on the plans with reference to the issue of grading on the west side of the
proposed garage.
9. A revocable right-of-way permit will be executed at the time of building permit.
10. All parking spaces have been provided in accordance with the size requirements of the Town's
development standards.
I I . All site grading is per the grading plan. No retaining walls are proposed.
12. As indicated above, Mr. Peter's wants to pursue these variance requests.
13. The house in not a demo/rebuild. Most of the existing floor area and struchre is being
maintained on the property. The building permit plans for this project will document exactly
what elements of the existing structure are being removed, however, the plans submitted also
show where floor is being modified.
14. The roof ridge has been modified to comply with the 33' height limitation based on the approved
"original" grades for the site.
15. The site coverage has been modified to comply with the square footage allowed.
16. The GRFA has been modified to comply with the square footage allowed.
The plan revisions should now be adequate for review by the PEC for the requested variances. We
understand that the project is scheduled for review by the PEC on Feb. 12, 2001. Please forward to us a
copy of the agenda and staff memorandum on this proposal when these items are completed and
available.
If you have any questions, please call 926-7 57 5 .
Row Agenti Paul Kelloqq Address: sbO lsth street suite 700 Doc. No.: 117bs9
Denver, CO 802024256 plaUGrid No.: 49943,1 S-T-R: 14-55-81
QUITCLAIM DEED
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo), a Colorado
corporation, of Denver, Colorado for good and valuable consideration hereby sells and quitclaims to
as present owner(s) of record of the real property described below, and whose address is:
the following described real property in the County of Eaqte and State of Colorado, to-wit:
All that portion of a utility and drainage easement located in the Southwest one-quarter of Section
14, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Town of Vail, being more
particularly described as follows;
The westerly five (5) feet of Lot 6, Block 6 of Vail Intermountain Development Subdivision,
according to the plat recorded October 1,'1970 at Reception number 114403; EXCEPTING
THEREFROM the southerly five (5) feet of said Lot and the northerly five (5) feet of said Lot;
FURTHER EXCEPTING any portion of a utility easement, shown on said plat anct labeled thereon
as a "15'Utility Easement."
Address of property:
Consideration: (less than $500) or (" with all its appurtenances.
Signed this Z-9tu' dayof
STATE OF COLORADO
2001.
PUBLIC S
By
as B. Faes, Manager
Siting & Land Rights, New Century Services
Agent for Public Service Company of Colorado
)
)ss.
City and County of Denver l
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ?3 @ Oay of Jan UanY , 2OO1
by Nicholas B. Faes as Manager, siting & Land Bights. ttew centurv s"iui""r, IGnlllfpuulic Service
Company of Colorado, a Colorado corporation.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires: November 3,2OO4
550 15tn Street Suite 7OO
f7 tr llil^ ^l , \--,/'| ' I /llYl g/ ,
Notary PubliC I
OMP
iStrike inapplicable phrase.
Denver, CO 80202-4256
Version: 1/01
ENCROACHMENT AGRDEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this 25th day of January, 2001, by Eagle River Water &
Sanitation District, a quasi-municipal corporation of the State of Colorado, hereinafter referred to as
"District", and Allen Peters, hereinafter referred to as "Property Owner".
WHEREAS, Property Owner is presently the owner of certain real property described as 2955
Bellflower Drive, Vail Q.ot 6,Blocl{{, Vail - Intermountain Subdivision), located in Eagle County,
Colorado; and
WHEREAS, the District is presently in possession of an €asement, 5-feet in width, running tlrough
the aforementioned property, said easement is described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference; and
WHEREAS, Property Owner is proposing to construct a permanent structures that will encroach upon
said easemqnt in an area approximately S-feet x 60-feet (additionally there are existing encroachments of
pavingff'part<ing;. Saia encroachment is herein described on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
WHEREAS, said easement is a non-active easement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and promises herein, the parties hereby agree
as follows:
The District shall permit the permanent structure to encroach upon said easement.
The Property Owner shall indemniff the Disfict from the costs of any repairs to the District's
utility lines which may occur as a result of the construction of the permanent structures over
and upon such easement.
The Properfy Owner shall hold the District harmless from the cost of repairing any damage
to the structures which may be caused by the installation of new utility lines in said easement,
or by a break in present and future utility lines of the District, or by the repair of such break
by the District or by other maintenanc€ of its lines.
The Property Owner shall indemnify the District from any increase in the cost of
construction of any new utility lines or in the cost of any repairs to the District's utility
lines, such increase, if any, due to the proximity of the permanent shuctures to the utility
lines.
This Agreement shall bind the successors and assigns of the Property Owner, and shall be
appurt€nant to and deemed to run with and for the benefit of the aforementioned property in
Eagle County, Colorado until such time that the District abandons said easement. This
Agreement shall be recorded against said property in accordance with the laws of the State
of Colorado.
F: \ lsWSD \8REGS \FORMS \PetersEncroach.doc
November 2000
i.
.,
.+.
5.
Ov
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day
and year frrst above written.
By
Allan Peters, PropertY Owner
EAGLE RTVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT
By
Dennis Gelvin, General Manager
STATEOFCOLORADO )
)ss
COLNTYOFEAGLE )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
-
day of
2001, by
Notary Public
Mv Commission expires:
STATEOFCOLORADO )
)SS
COUNTYOFEAGLE )
The foregoing instrument was aclqrowledged before me this
-
day of
2001, by Dennis Gelvin, General Manager of
My Commission expires:
of
l5l^'sd\4cng\forms\encroagr.frm
Notary Public
O
Department of C ommunity Deve lopment
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
970-479-2 138
MX 970-479-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
January 15,2001
Dominic Mauriello
PO Box 2658
Edwards, CO81632
Fax: 926-7576
RE: Proposed variances at 2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
To Whom lt May Concern:
The Planning Department has reviewed your re-submittal for the Peters Residence, located at 2955
Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain. The tollowing issues must be resolved qrior to
scheduling your Planning and Environmental Commission hearing:
'I .
z-
.J.
4.
5.
10.
11.
6.
7.
8.
Please show the interpolated existing grades prior to construction of the original residence so
staff can determine building height and slope of the site.
Please indicate the flood plain on the site plan.
The first 10 ft. oJ the driveway must be at 8%. The site plan indicates 107o. Please revise.
A 4 ft. concrete pan with 2 in. invert where the driveway meets the roadway is required.
Please label on olans.
No structures are allowed in the utility and drainage easement. Please maintain a minimum 5
tt. setback from each side property line to preserve this easement.
The limit of disturbance fence must be indicated on the site olan.
Please provide a landscape plan.
At the northwest area of the resident, adjacent to the steps going into the EHU, the grade is
not 2:1 as it exists. lf this area is disturbed, a 2:1 grade will be required. This may require a
retaining wall.
A revocable right-of-way permit is required for all improvements in the right-oi-way.
Exterior parking spaces are I ft. by 1 I ft. lnterior parking spaces are 9 ft. by 18 ft. Please
indicate all required parking spaces on the site plan.
Show all retaining walls. Any disturbed grading must return to a 2:1 grade.
{7 *"n'uo 'n'"*
12.
13.
14.
In regards to the variance requests, staff believes that the deviation from the code is in
excess of what is necessary. As currently proposed, staff will recommend denial of the
proposed variances. Staff will only support a side setback variance if a 5 ft. setback from the
property line is maintained. ln addition, stafi will not support the addition of new GRFA in the
front setback. Staff believes that by pushing the garage back on the lot, the parking in the
righfof-way will be minimized.
Staff continues to have concern regarding the amount of floor area to be demolished. lf more
than 50% of the GRFA of the residence is demolished, the application is considered a
"demolrebuild" and ineligible for the 250 bonus. Please provide a demo plan of the floor area
to be demolished.
The Peters Chalet is over the allowable height limitation of 33 ft. Building height is measured
to existing or finished grade, whichever is more restrictive. Please revise.
The Community Development Department has reviewed your application according to the
Primary/Secondary Zone District and the Survey provided:
Lot Size: 8624.8 sq. ft. (.198 acres)
Zoning: Primary/Secondary
Hazards: none
Standard Allowed Proposed
1 Site Coverage
GBFA
Primary:
Secondary:
Setbacks:
Front
Rear
Sides
Parking
2156.2 or 25%
4006.2 sq. ft.
2831 .2 sq. ft.
(includes 250)
1175 sq. ft.
20 ft.
50 ft.
1 5 ft./15 ft.
5 required
2230 sq. ft.
3774 sq. ft.
2897 sq. ft.
827 sq. fi.
7.5 tl.
50 ft.
4.5 ft./1 1.5 ft.
please indicate on plans
The Peters Chalet is approximately 66 sq. 1t- over the allowable GRFA for the primary unit. GRFA from
the EHU cannot be transferred from the EHU to the primary unit. Please revise. The Peters Chalet is
approximately 74 sq. ft. over on site coverage. All cantilevered spaces count as site coverage. Please
revise.
As soon as all of the above conditions have been met, I will schedule the Peters Chalet for a Planning
and Environmental Commission hearing on the variance requests, and a Design Review Board meeting
for a review of the design. Should you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact
me at 479-2369.
Planner ll
Town of Vail
Sinqerely,
JFN-18-a461 12:48 FRO1:ERALN 97894675-76
4--
FAI' TRAN$ITISION
ASST]CIATES a P.Mt/@?
fO!
FAI #r
FROX:
ftll,Eon
qvq-2,{9L
fr^)nic-
DAre t lrela t
RE: (e&< T^1,\-
PAGE* Z-
(includcr tlf,r cogcr rhcet)
cot{}lE}rrt:
tlee [Ja dn"cd rxit'ol |'e TaPvJ
q"ad.,ry(6"k be t+;l;uJ {or bi&itnt'
**A We,+ sh7 '''''Atr w;ldll' 3+
-th;s is ac.4loble' , /bos #ga on
p h.^ o..-J &* hp4 .
fhn[{.Dra^.
Plocg cll tycu hovcnctrccc&rcdcll pcaat01 lFut cnyptblqnrwiltthlrbsnrmirriqr.{-
Ca 3;
/d,i
int
tu,
e
BAI/ERA[.IN
nAhhllN6 artd COD4MUNIYY OEvELOPiIFJ'IT
E ltnudrVlbga Centcr luitc C-209
Ol05 Edwr&ts villrsc Bor/6ard
Pbd OftGG Sox 265S
E6mds, Cobr.do 816lz
Ar-rVO.rX7i7S
Fu - XrO.9267376
wvYw.brfi Jft3!6,ociatcr.cdrt
P.WE/EA?9799e67576
\
ASSOCICTES I Jfl.l-18-2491 12: 48 FRB'|:BRALh|
--I
9
QR,n ^ '
r.dffiroo,n
b;"}##ia,
4t.-
T gNYSR.AUIN ASSOCIIAITIES, III\C.
PLANNINC, and COI'1MUNl fY DEVELOPI4ENT
Dccember 26,2000
Allison Ochs
Planner 2
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Revisions to Peters Plans and Submittal for PEC Review - 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6. tslock 6.
Vail hrtermountain
Dear Allison:
Allan Peters has retained Braun Associates, lnc. to represcnt him with respect to his current PEC and
DRB applications that were submitted to the Town and still in the review process (see letter attached).
We hope that we can assist Mr. Peters and the 'Iown through a smooth PEC review process.
Since our last meeting on November 30, 2000,, where we discussed issues related to the Peters plans and
variances, we have revised the plans to addrcss issues raised by you and the TOV staff. We have also
made changes that we belicve improve the overall plan and f'unction of the sitc and address all of the
issues raised by you in your October 6, 2000 lctter to Peter Archer. l'hc most notable plan changcs
include:
r Modification of the driveway configuration
r Moving of access to the EHU to the west side of house
r Stepping back of second story ofbuilding by 7' (per DRB review)
o Delineation of the 100-year floodplain line (elcvation 7,805' per TOV Engineering)
Attached to this letter you will find application materials to be provided to the PEC for its review of the
variance applications. We would likc to proceed with PEC review of the variances and wait to procced to
the DRB until the PEC review is completed. The folkrwing is a list of requested variances, which we
believe are necessary for Mr. Peters to have reasonable use of his property:
r A front yard setback variance to allow the garage and GRFA to encroach from approximately 3'
to 8' in thc front setback.
Edwards Village Center: Suite C-209
0 105 Edwards Village Boulevard
Post Oflice Box 2658
Edwarts. Colorado 8 | 632
Ph. - 970.9)6.1575
Fax - 91A.9)6.757 6
wwwbraunas!ociate5.com
o Side yard setback variances to allow a garage, GRFA, on-grade stairs, and deck to encroach
approximately l5' to 5' in the side setback.
. A parking variance to allow two parking spaces to be partially located within the right-of-way.
You will find the lustification for these requests in the PEC attachment. We would like to have this item
scheduled for the January 22,2001 PEC heanng. We would also like to be scheduled for DRB on
February 7,2000. Please let me know if this date fits with your schedule.
I hope that you find these materials adequate for your review. If I can be of additional assistance, please
do not hesitate to contact me at 926-7 57 5.
Dominic F. Mauriello. AICP
TOWN OFVAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-179-2138
FAX 970-179-2452
www.ci.vail. co.us
D ep artm e n t of C ommun ity Dev e lop m en t
%,
October 6, 2000
Peter Archer and Associates
78A Mulcaster St.
Banie L4M 3M4
Alan and Francine Pelers
Fax: 970-476-9080
RE: Proposed variances at 2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
To Whom lt May Concern:
The Planning Department has reviewed your re-submittal for the Peters Residence, localed at
2955 Bellflower Dr. I Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain. The following issues must be resolved
prior to scheduling your Planning and Environmenlal Commission hearing:
1. Please show a// required selbacks on the site plan, including the 50 ft. Gore Creek
setback.
2. Please show the interpolated existing grades prior to construction of the original
residence.
3. Please indicate the flood plain on the site plan.
4. The new proposed driveway must be a minimum ot 12 ft. wide and 1 5 ft. wide on any
90 degree corner.
5. Please indicate a 4 ft. concrete pan with 2 inch invert. The pan must be the same
elevation on both sides. This will aftect the driveway grade.
6. Please indicate the materials of the retaining walls. Show the top and botlom
elevations of walls.
7. Lot lines are interpolated into the Town of Vail right-of-way by simply continuing the
lot lines to the edge of pavement. The proposed driveway must be entirely within
those interpolated boundaries. Adjust and revise.
8. Exlerior parking spaces are 9 ft. by 19 ft. All parking must be within the lot
boundaries. Adiust and revise.
{; *""""n 'o"o
Limits of disturbance fence must remain within lot boundaries. Ad.just and revise.
The maximum driveway width on the west slde cannol exceed 24 ft.
The maximum driveway grade cannot exceed 12% heated, .1 0% unheated.
The first 10 ft. of driveway cannot exceed 8% grade. The first 10 ft. starts from the
driveway side of the 4 ft. concrete plan, which must be the same elevation on both
sides. Adjust and revise.
With the second driveway, the site distance requiremenl of 250 ft. cannot be mei.
Adjust and revise.
Show all retaining walls^ Any disturbed grading musl return to a 2:1 grade.
On the Landscape Plan, the drainage trench on the east side of home musl be
maintained.
Enclosed parking spaces are 9 ft. by 18 ft. Adjust and revise.
Snow storage must be free of obstructions. Please indicate snow storage on the
landscape plan.
Please show the interpolated grades through the house so that staff can determine
building height. Please do nol hatch the roof, as this makes it difficult to analyze.
Sheet A1 is still unclear regarding the configuration of the stairway and the access of
the EHU. Does the indicated doonruay on this floor plan actually exist in the
basement or is it supposed to be on the floor above? Does it access storage
beneath the stairs? Please clarify.
On all floor plans, please indicate the location of the required setbacks. Because
additional GRFA is proposed in the setbacks, staff will need to calculate the square
footage of new GRFA in the setbacks.
The rear deck encroaches into the setback beyond the 5 ft. allowed. Please revise.
In regards to the variances requesled: I believe that it is possible to add a garage,
and meet your parking requirement without a front setback variance. While a side
setback variance would still be necessary, staff is not supportive of the front setback
variance. One of the criteria for a variance is that the requested variance is the
minimum deviation from the code. I feel that the variance reouesl is an excessive
deviation from the setback requirements. In addition, in a conceptual review of the
Peters Chalet, the Design Review Board recommended that the garage be stepped
back from the house to provide for more relief in the front fagade of the building.
The Community Development Department has reviewed your application according to the
Primary/Secondary Zone District and the Survey provided:
q
10.
11.
lz.
tJ.
14.
IA tJ.
16.
17.
18.
tY-
20.
21.
zz.
Lot Size: 8624.8 sq. ft. (.'198 acres)
Zoning: Primary/Secondary
Hazards: none
Standard Allowed Prooosed
Site Coverage 2156.2 or 25/" 2097 sq. ft.GRFA 4006.2 sq. ft. 3774 sq. ft.Primary: 2831.2 sq. ft. 2974 sq. ft.
(includes 250)Secondary: 1175 sq. ft. 800 sq. ft.
Setbacks:Front 20 ft. 7.5 ft.Rear 50 ft. show 50 ft. Gore Creek setback Sides 15 ft./15 ft. 4.5 ft./1l ft.Parking 5 required please revise
The Pelers Chalet is approximately 143 sq. tl. over the allowable GRFA for the primary unit.
GRFA from the EHU cannotbe translerred from the EHU to the primary unit. Please revise.
As soon as all of the above conditions have been met, I will schedule the Peters Chalet for a
Planning and Environmental Commission hearing on the variance requesls, and a Design
Review Board meeting for a review of the design. Should you have any additional questions,
please do not hesitate to contact me at 479-2369.
Singerely, - "
i . 4l
./ ' ; / ',t -i LI - i-l'J-" !- '"-
Aliison Ochs
Planner ll
Town of Vail
D e partment of C ommun ity D eve lopme nt
t a ,r\
-(a
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-179-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
t
August 17,2000
Pcter Archer and Associates
78A Mulcaster St.
Banie L4M 3M4
Alan and Francine Peters
Fax: 970476-9080
RE: Proposed variances at2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
To Whom It May Concern:
The Planning Department has revicwed your re-submittal fbr the Peters Residence, located at 2955
Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intcrmountain. The following issues must be resolved prior to
scheduling your Planning and Environmental Commission hearing (a lener with any public works issues
will follow):
Please show all reqtired setbacks on the site plan.
Pleasc provide a demo plan, shading all floor area to be demolished. Less than 50% ofthe
lloor area can be demolished, or it will be considered a demo-rebuild. This effects your
GRFA allowance.
4.
5.
As proposed, the residence is over on height. Maximum height is 33 ft. above existing or
finished grade, whichever is more restrictive. Bccause the residence is existing, the grades
prior to constnrction must be interpolated on the site plan. Please show the interpolated
existing grades prior to construction ofthe original residence.
Thc EHU cannot be accessed liom the interior of the main unit. Please provide an cxterior
entrance to the EHU and remove the interior access {iom the main unit.
The Peters Chalet has applied tbr variances lrom setback requirements (front, both sides), and
site coverage requirements (allowable is 20oh., proposed is 24.7%). As currently proposcd,
variances would also be rcquired lor GRFA, height, parking, and EHU requirements. I feel
that I could support a variance tbr site coverage and the west and tront setback. However, thc
degree to which the variance is requested I believe to be more than necessary. As currently
proposed, staff would recommend denial on this project. Site coverage variances are
typically supported for garage additions on small lots with no enclosed parking. However,
the site coverage variancc is necessary ibr not only thc garage, but also fbr the other
additions. An over-sized garage could be added rvithour a sitc coverage variance.
l.
2.
3.
{,7 ""n""'o 'o"r
The Community Development Department has reviewed your application according to the
Primary/Secon dary Zone District and the Survey provided:
Lot Size: 8624.8 sq. ft. (.198 acres)
Zoning: PrimaryiSecondary
Hazards: none
Standard Allowed Proposed
Site Coverage 1724.96 or 2OVo 2134.5 sq. ft^ or 24.7Yo
Landscape Area min. of 5175 sq. ft. 5722.3 sq. ft.
GRFA 4006.2 sq. ft. 42i8 sq. ft.
Primary: 283 L2 sq. ft. 3 140 sq. ft.
Secondary: 1175 sq. ft. 1078 sq. ft.
Parking 5 required please revise
GRFA: The Peters Chalet is approximately 309 sq.ft. over the allowable CRFA. All of the allowable
GRFAfor the EHU must be usedJbr the EHU. All spaces within the interior of the building are
considered GfuFA unless noted as "less than 5 ft. in head height" and can have an access door no greater
than 12 sq. ft.
Sincercly, .,,11 ,.ii .-- { .i'\
l/[U-.- A?,
Allison Ochs
Planner II
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 t 38
FAX 970-479-2452
March 16,2000
Peter Archer
Reinders and Associates Ltd.
54 Cedar Pointe Dr' Unit l20l
Barrie, ON L4N 5R7
Fax'. 705-726'9445
RE: Proposed variances at2955 Bellflower Dr. i Lot 6, Block 6, vail Intermountain
Dear Peter:
The Design Review Board conceptually reviewed the proposed remodel located at2955
Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain. The following were their comments and
concefns:
L Because of the parking issues, the Design Review Board felt that stepping the garage
back to allow for p".tJng on site would be an architecturally acceptable solution and
would improve thb appearance ofthe residence by providing reliefto the street front.
Z. For the final Design itiview Board, please provide a materials and color board.
3. Please provide a landscape plan.
SincerelY,
ltfitt/, U'b
Allison Ochs
Planner II
Town of Vail
tP *"n""'u '^"*
l1 _.,r{ b
-r,
rj
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
March 7, 2000
Reinders and Associatcs Ltd.
54 Cedar Pointe Dr. Unit l20l
Banie, ON L4N 5R7
Alan and Francine Peters
Fax: 970-476-9080
RE: Proposed variances at 2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
To Whom It May Concern:
The Community Dwelopmcnt Departmcnt has received your applicarion for the Peters Residence, located
at 2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain. Additional information is requircd before
staff can adequatcly review your plans. The following issucs must be resolved prior to scheduling your
Planning and Environmental Commission hearing:
l. Show all contours on the sitc plan, including interpolated contours through the proposed and
existing residence.
2. Please show all setbacks on the site plag including thc 50' Gore Creek setback
3. Please indicate a scale on the floor plans.
4. Please provide floor plaru for all levels of the residence, including the basement unit.
5. Show all proposed grading and retaining walls on a grading plan (or include it on the site
plan).
6. Please show all roof ridge and eave clevations on the site plan so staff can determine building
heicht.
Pleasc provide a lantiscape plan.
Please provide an exterior lighting plan.
Please indicate snow storagc on the site plan. Snow storage is 30o/. of the driveway area and
must bc entirely within lot boundarics and contiguous to the drivcway.
7.
8.
9.
{p *""'""'o 'o'u
Thc secondary unit on the lot must be updated with our cunent deed restriction. One has
been included fbr your review. The deed restriction requires that this unit be rented to a full-
time Eagle County resident.
Enclosed parking spaces are required to be 9 ft. by l8 ft. Cunently one ofyour garage
parking spaces does not meet this requirement. Surlbce parking spaces are required to be 9 ft.
by 19 ft. and must be entirely within lot boundaries. Plcase revise.
Please indicate the surfacing of the driveway and if any improvements are to be donc. A 4 tt.
concrete pan with a 2" invcrt will be required.
Please indicate the 10O-year Flood Plain on the site plan.
Show spot and grade elevations of Bcllflower and the driveway.
Please indicate a limit of disturbancc on the site plan. This will need to be delineatcd in the
field with a construction fence.
Please show sonre fbrm of erosion control between Core Crcck and the construction area.
'Itre Community Development Departmcnt has reviewcd your application according to the
PrimaryiSecondary Lone District and the Survey provided:
Lot Size: 8624.8 sq. 11. (,198 acrcs)
Zoning: Primary/Secondar5,
Hazards: none
Standard Allowed Proposed
Sitc Coverage 1724.96 or 200/o2124 sq. ft. or 24.6Yo
GRFA 3506 sq. ft. need t'loor plans
Primary: 2906 sq. ft.
Secondary: need floor plans
Parking 5 required please revise
This inlbrmation must be received a minimum of 5 working days prior to your Planning and
Environmental Commission meeting. As soon as this intbrmation is received, I will schedule you for a
Planning and Environmental Commission meeting. You arc currently schcduled tbr a conccptual Design
Review Board hearing on March l5''. Should you have any questions regarding these items, please do
not hesitate to contact me at 479-2369.
10.
11.
l:.
l.).
t4.
I5.
16.
Sinyrelv. 4^.lIlt' / rl)
lll!,{1"-U6.^--
Allison Ochs
Planner II
Town of Vail
10.
I l.
'Ihe secondary unit on the lot must bc updated with our current deed restriction. One has
bcen included for your review. The deed restriction requires that this unit be rentcd to a full-
time llagle County resident.
Enclosed parking spaces are required to be 9 ft. by l8 ft. Currently one ofyour garage
parking spaces does not meet this requirement. Surface parking spaces are required to be 9 ft.
by l9 ft. and must be entirely within lot boundaries. Please revise.
Please indicate the surfacing of the drivcway and if any improvcments are to be done. A 4 ft.
concrete pan with a 2" invert will be required.
Please indicate the I00-year Flood Plain on thc site plan.
Show spot and grade elevations of Bellf'lower and the driveway.
Please indicate a limit of disturbance on the site plan. This will need to be delineated in the
field with a construction fencc.
Please show some form oferosion control bctwecn Gore Creek and the construction area.
t2.
r3.
14.
15.
16.
f'he Community Development Department has reviewed your application according to the
Primary/Secondary Zone District and the Survey provided:
t.ot Sizc: 8624.8 sq. ft. (. 198 acres)
Zoning: Primary/Secondary
Hazards: none
Standard
Site Coverage
GRIA
Primary:
Secondary:
Parking
Allowed
1724.96 or 20%o
3506 sq. ft.
5 required
Proposed
2124 sq. ft. or 24.6oh
necd floor plans
2906 sq. ft.
need tloor plans
please revise
This information rnust be rcceivcd a minimum of 5 working days prior to your Planning and
Environmental Commission meeting. As soon as this information is received, I will schedule you for a
Planning and L,nvironmental Cornmission meeting. You are cuncntly schcduled fbr a conceptual Design
Review Board hearing on March 15"'. Should you have any questions rcgarding these items, please do
not hesitate to contact me at 479-2369.
Allison Ochs
Planner lI
Town of Vail
tr,.o'oN FoR r,.^**,1," ;ffiil:"ffi ^:
47 s "2t 3'\
COMMISSION APPROVAL
GENERAL INFORMATION
This application is for any projcct rcquiring approval by thc Planning and Environmcntal Commission. For spccific
information, sec thc submittal rcquircments for thc particular approval that is rcqucstcd. Thc application can not bc
acceptcd until all rcquircd information is submittcd. Thc project may also nced to bc reviewcd by &c Town Council
andy'or thc Dcsigrr Rcvicw Board.
A, TYPE OF APPLICATION:
S/ eaaifionat GRFA (250)
tr Bcd and Brcaldast
D Conditional Use Permit
tr Major or E Minor Subdivision D Rczoning
B Sigrr Variance
Er vanancc
tr Zoning Codc Amcndmcnt
tr Amcndmcnt to an Approvcd Dcvelopmcnt Plan tr Employee Housing Unit (Iypc: _)tr Major or tr Minor CCI Extcrior Alteration
(Vail Village)
D Major or tr Minor CCII ExtcriorAltcration
(Lionshead)
Special Dcvelopmcnt Disbict
Major or E Minor Amcndmcnt to an SDD
tr
o
B. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST: Re-l-j-ef frcnr corzeraqe and GRFA requirene.nts and
TAWN OFVAIL
fgfief frcrn sjde and front yard setbacks
U.
c.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LOT___5__BLOCK 6 FILING
ADDRESS:
zoNtNo:
2955 Fbll-flcn^rer Dr., Vai.!-, C0 BUILDINGNAME: pprFrq r_h.ata+
NAME OF OWNER(S): AIiN &FRAI{CINE PETERS ltt ' /'. . r'' a r'2 .'r, / ' rt / I '- / | \ | I //-//'c/v.''
MAILINC ADDRESS: 20 DA Toronto, Ot{MsP 2P7
F, OWNER(S) SIGNATURE(S):
G.NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE:ers & Associates (Barrie) Ltd.
MAILING ADDRESS: 54 Cedar: pointe Dr., Unit 1201
pHONE: (705) 726-6722
FA)(: (705) 72,6-944s
FEE . SEE THE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPROPRIATE FEE.
SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE
DEPAR'IMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, T5 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD.
-PHONE:
(-416 ) 488-2870
VAIL, COLORADO 81657.
Rcvird 5D5
REINDERS
February 2-1. 2000
Lrepartnrent of Cotnntunity Dcvelopment
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorada USn
tit6i7
A-ttentiqn:-$r. Brent Wilson, Planner II
Ltcar Sir':
RE: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FOR
TIIE PETEIIS CHALET
LOT 6, BLOCK 6, VAIL INTERMOTINTAIN
VAIL, CoLORADA
Rlue plints ol'thc proposed addition to the l)cters chalet 2963 Bclltlower Drive havc lreen serlt to
r r'ru trucler sellaratc cover. Our purposc in writing is to strbmit to you the nature of tltc variatrcc
rr:tlucsled lbl the Variarrce Application we aLe currently submitting.
'I lrc- Peters chalet is located on Lot 6, Block 6 of the Vail - Intelnrour"rta in Developntent
Srrbclivision in thc Town of Vail, Colorada. lt consists of a two storey lrarnc dwellirtg rvith a
paltial lvalkc-rut baserncnt containing an accessory dwelling unit. Fronr our calculatious thc total
area of the lot is 8,690.73 ftt. Fronr our Ineasurements the total cxisting CRFA is 2.458.15 11.r.
Frorl tlrr calculations the total GRFA allowed for this property is 2,597.68 ft.:. This CRFA
alloircd inclucles an alkrlvartce of 425 ft.? firr a secondary dwelling unit.
'l lre cxistirrg property is currently irr non-conforming with the fown ol'Vail Prinran /Seconda 11
Residential District (PS) in thai the lot area is suhstantially smaller than the 15.000 fi.r of
burldable area dictated on the Residential llistrict Plan.
t he properlv is also non-coutbrnring in other areas le:
L l'he current liont yard setback is l5' 3 %" required setback is 20'.
2. The side yard setback to the cast is I l' 9 %" contrary to thc stipulated nrinirlunr side yard
scttrack of I 5'.
(rur clierrt. Mr. Alarr Pcters wishes to expand and nrodernize the chalet, specilically to provide a
t\rv'o cat'garage arrd a larger living area and master bedroonr suite. As you ale aware fi'onr our
prer' ious discussions. the only developable area is to the west of the existirrg chalet at the site of
tlre currcnt dliveway and outdoor parking. 'fhis lvill bring us into conflict rvitlr thc side;''ard
sr:tback requircrrent fol the west side of the property. As lvell, the currcnt chalet is close to the
Reinders and Assoclates (Barrie) Ltd. Architect, Consulting Engineers, Planners & Project Managers
Unit 1201 , 54 Cedar Pointe Drive, Barrie, Ontario L4N 5R7
Phon€: (705) 726-6722 Fax: (705) 726-9445
E-mail: reinders@mail.transdata.ca
f1a\iprrffrl GRFA allowed under Ordinance l2-15-2. We will therefore be reqtresting specilic
lclief lionr the l'ollowinc Ordirrances.
t.Ortlinang\12-6D-5 z-. Lot Area andlite Dirnension;-a
/'\
The existing lot alea is below the ntinirnunr lot'area of 15,000
r thf'Ordinance. ,/
\--l -v,
al lorved under this' Ordi
Ordinanccl2-6D-6 Setbacks
The existiug side yard setback to the east is ll' 9t/z which is below the minimurrt side
yard setback of l5'. The proposed westenl setback is 3' at its minimutn point fi'om the
western property line.
-),
.t.
).Ordinance 12-15-2 (IRFA Reouirenrents bv Zone f)istrict
Frorn our calculations the GRFA allowcd for this property would total 2,597.68 fl.'?. This
is based on an allowancc GRItrA of 25o/" of the lot area plus an additional 425 tl.: tbr a
sectudaly unit. The proposed addition and renovations would take the total proposed
GRFA to 3,746.83 ft.r. This figure excludes basenrcnt sbragc/mechan ical and thc tr,vo
cal' *qalage wlrich is part of the new construction.
'l hcse above calculations are sunrnarized on our Site Plan DrawineNo. 9613D-Site Revision No.
I claled Fetrruary 3, 2000 and attached.
the existing l)etcrs chalet is bounded on the south, east and west sides by singlc' fanrily
rt:sidential units. l'lre north edge of the l)etcrs property fronts onto Gore Creek. 1 he property on
tlrc othcr side of Gore Creek is a residential condonrinium.
t he proposed renovatiorrs and addition propose to construct an addition to the wcst ofthc existirrg
clralct to u,ithiu three (3) feet of the property line. T'his portion of the new addition will include a
RcinderE and Assoclates (Barrle) Ltd. Architect, Consulting Engineers, P/anners & Proiect
Unit 1201, 54 Cedar Pointe Drive, Barrie, Ontario L4N 5R7
Phone: (705) 726-6722 Fax: (70s) 726-9445
E-mail: reinders@mail.transdata.ca
We arc adding a covered cntry to thc front of tlre existing chalet which rvill be l.i' 7ru !"
fi'orn the front lot line. The required liont yard setback is 20' 0".
Ordinancc l2-6D-8 Density Control
The existing property is of non-contbrming use as only one dwelling unit is pernritted on
lots less tharr 15.000 |t.'?. The existing chalct already has arr acccssoly drvclling urrrt in
the walkout basernent which will be unaffected.
Ordinance 12-6D-9 Site Coverage
This Ordinancc dictates that the site coverage shall not cxceed 200lo ofthe total site arca.
OLrr proposed development will be 23.14% of the lot area.
dable
t\vo car garage built over a portion of the existing outdoor parking area with a deu lo tlre nofth.
Above the garage and the den there will be a new master bedroom and ensuite nraster bath. As
u,ell. an additional four (4) feet is being added across the north portion of the chalet to increase
thc living area within. The existing entrance is from the west side of the chalet. It is the intentiott
of tlris proposal that a new nrore spacious and acconrmodating covered entry be btrilt to the fiont
of the chalet.
The existing siding is to be rernoved iionr the cntire chalet and is tr: be replaced with a
c,.rur b inat it-rn of stone and stttcco.
1he printary intents of tlrc renovation and addition was the constructiorr of a ucrv two car sal'ase.
The only logical space to put this addition would be to the west of the cxisting chalet inttuding
irrto the required side yard setback. As it is, tlre two car garage is uot spacious in width artd is in
firct nrirrinrunr. 'l'hc ad-jaccnt property to the west is built to thc western portion of thc property
rr ith tlre dliveway along its east boundary. Construction of the addition to the Peters chalct will
tlrcrcfore not adversely shade this adjacent propefty. There will be some mirrirnal shading of tlrc
clriveu,ay in thc early morrring but thc bulk of the day the ad.jacent propcrly to tlre west u'ill
erpcrience rro aU'ects fi'onr the proposed addition.
Ihis addition rvill also rcquire rclief from the fi'ont yald required setback of twenty (20) fcet.
horvcver. it should be noted that thc actual roadway on Bellflower Drive is suhstantiallv fbrrvard
of the ploposed addition. As you can see frorn the attached Site Plan this will still allorv fbr the
parking of three (3) vehicles on the rernainirrg existing driveway to the front of thc chalet.
-l hc rernaining variances are tlrose requested fbr relief lrom the coverage and GRFA. As can bc
scen tlonl our drawings and the analysis on our Site Plan, the existing chalet is cufrentl)' at the
rrraxirnunr urrder the Vail plan. The actual usage of the property rernains tlre sanre rvith orre ( | )
prirlarr drvelling and an acccssory dwelling in the walkout basenrent. The nrajor dill-erence
crcated bv this proposed rerrovation and addition is that the quality ofthc property is substantially'
increased in both style and appearance.
We do not believe this Application is a rnajor variance with Vail's Conrprehensive Plan and in
tlct is in general confolmity with the new developrnents in the Vail-lntermountair) Subdivision
it fca.
Relnders and Assoclate3 (Barrie) Ltd. Architect, Consulting Engineers, P/anners & Project Managers
Unit 1201 , 54 Cedar Pointe Drive, Banie, Ontario L4N 5R7
Phone: (705) 726-6722 Fax: (705) 726-9445
E-mail: reinders@mail.transdata.ca
Should you have any further comments or queries, or wish any additional inforrnation, please do
not hesitatc to contact the undersiened.
Y'ours truly,
REINDERS AND ASSOCIATf,S (BARRIE) LIMITED
Petgh Archer, B. Arch., O.A.A.
!'ice President
PA:sg
Errcs.
c c. Mr. Alan Peters
Relnderg and Associatca (Barric) Ltd. Architect, Consultlng Engineers, Planndrs & Prolect Manages
Unit 1201 , 54 Cedar Pointe Drive, Banie, Ontario L4N 5R7
Phone: (705) 726-6722 Fax fl05) 726-9445
E-mall: rainders@mail.transdata.ca
REINDERS
Ii t ,..
.Joh rr ll. Colclstein
It)ti.i llellflower Dr.
\/lil. C O 81657
I'lt r rr: & Vlaly Vlaar
l:'.( ). []6x -l l2 i
\r;ril. ("(-) 81658
l: rarrc is cQ Paula A llen
l99l Bellllorver Dr. #El
\/rril. ( (l 81658
.l l, ( ) ll|icn
.ll)l S. L)orr nins
L)crrr cr'. (l( ) 80209
r. rlir: \\; e b l.r
l'.t ). L}(rx 5()l
Viril. ( () 81658
\/irrevrrrtl V ail Ventures LLC
7f)b l{ace Street
I )errr.er'. ('( .) 80206
l:lisl .iean llerrrardo
It)Sl Bc' I I flo'"ver Dr.
'ti arl. ( () B I 6-5 7
Illiarr & Nurnc-r, Lee
litrr ocltble f lust
(i()ll E. ),,lichols Pl.
l lsl.'rr.,-rorl. CO 80I Il
( rlrrL: \tttllrl
.l()tr.l l lell I lou,er Dr.
Vlil. t () 81657
Vail, CO 8r657
Reinderr and Associates (Barrie) Ltd. Architect, cojsultrng Engineers, planners & pro,iiect Managers
Unit 1201 , 54 Cedar Pointe Drive, Barri€, Ontario L4N SR7
Phone: (705) 726-6722 Fax: (705) 726-9445
E-mail: reinders@mail.transdata.ca
LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS AND IVIAILING ADDRESSES
.\PPLICATION FOR PLANNINC AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSI()N
AI'PROVAL
O(JIT CLIENT: ALAN AND FRANCINE PETERS
2955 BELLFLOWER DR.. VAIL. COLORADO
Michael O'Meara
2801 Basi'rgdale
Vail, CO 81657
Kenrreth W. Holnr
2932 B Bellflower Dr.
Vail, CO 81657
I nterlochett Colrdorrr itr iunr As-soe iatiot)
2958 S. Flontage Rd. W,
REINDERS
Ii I;:
.lohrr Fl. Co lclstein
l9ii.l Belltlower Dr.
\/lrl. C'O 81657
l'llrrrr & VIary Vlaar
|]'.(). tsrtx tl l2l
\r;ril. ( O 816-58
f larrcis ct Paula Allen
l99l Bellflower Dr. #B
\/ail.(() 816j8
.1.I,. (.)'Bricn
.11)l \. [)orr. rr'no
l)crrvcr. C(l 80?09
t, rlil \\rebh
l:' t ). Bos 5t) I
Vuil. ( () 81658
\/ irrer,llti Vlil Ventures [.LC
7(16 Race Street
l)err.er'. C(.) 80206
ll,lisa .lean Berrrardo
I ()81 Bellf lo'uver Dr.
\;lil. ('O 8I657
l:lriarr & Nancy Lee
li er oclt[rle 'f rust
(r9ll E. \ichols Pl.
],.r'ililu,r.rotl. CO 80 ll2
t r;ri,l .\ ftirf(l
I t )(r-l Ltellllorvcr Dr.
\ruil. L(.) u1657
LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS AND MAILING ADDRESSES
APPI,ICAIION FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
AI'PROVAL,
OI]R CLIENT: ALAN AND FRANCINE PETERS
2955 BET,LFLOWER DR., VAIL, COLORADO
Michael O'Meala
2801 Basingdale
Vail, CO 81657
Kenneth W. Holnr
2932 B Bellflower Dr.
Vail, CO 81657
I nterloclren Condorn iniunr Associatiotr
2958 S. Frontage Rd. W.
Vail, CO ltl657
Reindcrr and Asociates (Barrie) Ltd. Architact, Consultlng Engineers, P/anners & Project Managers
Unit 1201 , 54 Cadar Pointe Drive, Banie, Ontario L4N 5R7
Phone: (705) 726-6722 Fax (705) 726-9445
E-mail: reinders@mail.transdata.ca
0,. ,,EM MAy AFFEcr ror* r*or*"
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town ol
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on March 27,2000, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vait Municipal Biritoing. tn
consideration of:
A joint worksession with the Design Review Board to discuss the proposed development
plan/master plan and a conditional use permit for a park and recreation facility for in
approximately 12 acre unplafted parcel of land zoned General Use and Residential Cluster,
commonly referred to as the lower bench of Donovan Park, located south of the South Frontaoe
Road and east and north of Matterhorn Circle.
Applicant: Town of Vail / Vail Recreation District Planner: Dominic Mauriello
A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for site regrading, a building addition,and long
range planning, located at 3160 Katsos Ranch Road/Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12'n Filing.
Applicant: Vail Mountain School, represented by Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz Architects Planner: Brent Wilson
A request for a conditional use permit, to relocate 1300' of low-lflng bike path, informally known
as the Katsos Property, located at Tract A, Vail Village 12'n Filing.
Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs
A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for the establishment of a major arcade at the
Vail Transportation Center, located at241 E. Meadow Drive/y'ail Transportation Center.
Applicant: H.J. Hyde, Jr.Planner: Brent Wilson
A request for final review of a proposed major amendment to Special Development District #4
(Cascade Village), located at 1000 S. Frontage Road West (Glen Lyon Office Building)/Lot 54,
Block K, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: Dundee Realty, represented by Segerberg Mayhew Architects Planner: George Ruther
A request for a variance from Sections 12-6D-9, 12-6D-8 and 12-6D-6, Town Code, to allow for
a garage and residential addition, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6, Block 6,Vail
Intermountain.
Applicant: Alan & Francine Peters Planner: Allison Ochs
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office localed at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please aall 47j
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information. f_,
'\ _'
t\,.. rll' t
.ij-
f':A-
l)'
1l.,''
Community Development Department
Published March 10. 2000 in the VailTrail.
co-or?iff Development Pun nou?g Form
Routed To:Greg Hall or Leonard Sandoval, Public Works
Return To:Allison
Date Routed:3n4/01
Retum By:ASAP
Project Name:
Project Address:
Project Legal:
Project Description:
Peters Variance
2955 Bellflower
Lot 6, Block 6,Vul lntermountain
Addition to existing P/S (many, many variances)
Approved _x_Denied (cite detailed reasons)Approved with conditions
Sheet S1 - Can EHU parking space be blocked? Staff Question.
Need Revocable Right of Way Permit for parking in easement, concrete pan.
Removing tree will distwb ar€a on west side of home near steps to EHU unit. Show on site plan - a retaining wall
or adjust contours to a 2:1 grade.
Reviewedby: LeonardSandoval Date reviewed: 3-16-01
co-JRity Development ruo nou?g Form
Routed To:Gres Hall or Leonard Sandoval, Public Works
Retum To;Allison
Date Routed:t/09/01
Retum By:ASAP
Project Name:
Project Address:
Project Legal:
Project Description:
Peters Variance
2955 Bellflower
Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Addition to existing P/S (many, many variances)
Including variance for parkingi n right-of-way
Resubmittal
Approved x Denied (cite detailed reasons)Approved with conditions
Show on site plan - 100 Year Flood Plain , not high water
irst l0 ft of driveway must be 8ol0, site plan shows l0%. Please change to 8o%.
w on site plan- 4' concrete pan W 2" invert No Heat
how on site plan - Any heat in Town of Vail right of way must be in separate zone and marked at contol box
TOV orROW.
Remove or relocated tree on property east of driveway to allow better site distance when backing out.
cannot be in Utility I Drurage Easement.
on site plan - all required parking spaces. 9'x 19' outside, 9'x l8' inside.
w on site plan Limit of disturbance fence. Adjust and Revise
eed Landscape plan.
North Ailest area of home, next to steps going down into the EHU, the grade is not 2:l as it exists. If this area
is disturbed, 2:1 grade will be required. Some form of retaining wall may be needed and must meet all Town of
Vail Standards.
Revocable right of way permit required for any landscaping, heated driveway in Town of Vail right of way area
and 4' concrete pan. Permit required and building permit stage.
Reviewedbv: LeonardSandoval Date reviewed: l-15-01
F:\EVERYONRDRIAROUTING\98ROUTNG\PUBLICWO\l MASTER. FRM
o
fil'w WA
/d' Myrta= tx+1*
(*, l* tq quW' L'/'qo V
hw, ?oz 4N
o
WW ffie*
4\ttr, 62'l il
zv1 4
MV 8n wu
co-ro?iff Development run noufg Form
Routed To:Greg Hall or Leonard Sandoval, Public Works
Return To:Allison
Date Routed:1/09/01
Retum By:ASAP
Project Name:
Project Address:
Project Legal:
Project Description:
Peters Variance
2955 Bellflower
Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Addition to existing P/S (many, many variances)
Including variance for parkingi n right-of-way
Resubmittal
Approved _x_Denied (cite detailed reasons)Approved with conditions
Garage cannot be in Utility / Drainage Easement.
Need Landscape plan.
Revocable right of way permit required for any landscaping, parking in right of way, heated driveway in Town
of Vail right of way area and 4' concrete pan. Permit required and the building permit stage.
Town of Vail Public Works Deparhnent will allow parking in Right of Way but owners will be required to be
off the edge of asphalt minimum of 24 ft. to garage doors, they should be ok unless plans are changed. A
Revocable Right of Way Permit is required for approval.
Reviewed by: Leonard Sandoval Date reviewed: 2-7-01
co,n,ntg Development run noutil! Form
Routed To:Greg Hall or Leonard Sandoval, Public Works
Retum To:Allison
Date Routed:9t25/00
Retum By:ASAP
Project Name:
Project Address:
Project Legal:
Project l)escription:
Peters Variance
2955 Bellflower
Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Addition to existing P/S (many, many variances)
Resubmittal
Approved _x_Denied (cite detailed reasons)Approved with conditions
Need Title Report
Show on site plan - Flood Plain
New proposed driveway must be a minuimin of l2'wide and on any 90 degree mrner driveway must be 15' wide.
Show on site plan 4' concrete pan w / 2" invert. Pan elevation on both sides. This will affect the driveway grade.
Adjust and revise.
Outside parking is 9' x l9'. All parking mrct be inside of lot boundaries. Adjust and Revise
Show on site plan , the type of materials use for retaining wall and top and bottom elevations
Driveways 4' conuete pan must stay with lot boundaries even in Town of Vail Right of Way. Adjust and Revise
Limit of disturbance fence must stav rvith lot boundaries. Adiust and Revise
Max driveway width on west side cannot exceed 24'
Max driveway grade cannot exceed l2ohheated, l0olo unheated.
First l0' ofdriveway cannot exceed 8% grade, l0 ft starts from driveway side of4' concrete pan. Concrete pan
is the same elevation on both sides.(width)Adjust and Revise.
With second driveway, site distance of 250 cannot be made with tree to the east. Site distance per T.O.V.
standards is required.
Show all retaininu walls .
Any disturbed grading must retum to a 2:1 grade.
Must maintain drainage trench on east side of home in Landscape Plan.
Parking space inside garage is 9'xl8', parking space exceeds in Laundry room page ,{2 ofplans
Date received:
Reviewed bv: Leonard Sandoval Datereviewed: l0-02-00
oo
Community Development Plan Routing Form
Routed To:Greg Hall or Leonard Sandoval, Public Works
Return To:Allison
Date Routed:8/11/00
Return By:ASAP
Project Name:
Project Address:
Project Legal:
Project Description:
Peters Variance
2955 Bellflower
Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Addition to existing P/S (many, many variances)
Resubmittal
Approved _x_Denied (cite detailed reasons) Approved with conditions
rl'.'l;:
;,,.: '
;.:.:;''t
':: .,'i :,., ,':.,.
Need f itle Report
Show orr site plan - Flood Plain
New proposed driveway must be a mimuimin of l2'wide and on any 90 degree comer driveway must be 15' wide.
Show on site plan 4' concrete pan w / 2" invert
Outside parking is 9' x l9'. All parking must be inside of lot boundaries. Adjust and Revise
Is there any driveway improvements? Heat, Asphalt, Brick, etc.
Show on site plan , the type of materials use for retaining wall and top and bottom elevations
Driveways 4' concrete pan must stay with lot boundaries even in Town of Vail Right of Way. Adjust and Revise
Limit of disturbance fence must stay with lot boundaries. Adiust and Revise
Max driveway width on west side cannot exceed 24'
Max driveway grade cannotexceed l2Yoheated, l0% unheated.
First l0' ofdriveway cannot exceed 8olo grade, l0 ft starts liom driveway side of4' concrete pan. Concrete pan
is the same elevation on both sides.(width)Adjust and Revise.
What all weather surface is drivewav?
Show all retainine walls
Any disturbed grading must return to a 2: I grade.
Date received:
Reviewed by: Leonard Sandoval Date reviewed: 8-18-00
F\EVERYONADRI F.ROUTINC\98ROUTNC\PUBLICWO\ I MASTER.FRM
co-ro?ity Development n"o nootg Form
Routed To:Greg Hall or Leonard Sandoval, Public Works
Retum To:Allison
Date Routed:3/2/00
Retum By:ASAP
Project Name:
Project Address:
Project Legal:
Project Description:
Peters Variance
2955 Bellflower
Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Addition to existing P/S (many, many variances)
TOTALLY INCOMPLETE APPLICATION. I AM INCLUDING A DRAFT
OF MY LETTER TO THE ARCHITECT. PLEASE TELL ME WHAT
OTHER INFORMATION YOU NEED
Approved _x_Denied (cite detailed reasons)Approved with conditions
Need Title Report
Show on site plan - Flood Plain
Show spot and grade elevations on Bellflower and driveway
Show on site plan 4' concretepan w I 2" invert
Outside parking is 9' x l9'. All parking must be inside of lot boundaries. Adjust and Revise
Is there any driveway improvernents? Heat, Asphalt, Brick, etc.
Show on site plan , the type of materials use for retaining wall and top and bottom elevations
Show on site plan, limit of disturbance / Construction fence.
Show on site plan, some form of erosion control between Gore creek and construction area.
Reviewed by: Leonard Sandoval Date reviewed: 3-2-00
6et
)-'',11y lz
r':l ll'$t
l,,l 'tt' l'l'-
wAt{t(AN't'Y t)t|ltil)
l'llll lll{l{ll' Mlrle thir lttC rltf rrl' 0etghrr
iloffl Fonuu0lt0o iltD IEEV Fanq,uo[00
frl tlre mrrl t\1r1rrtv rrl fl[l HH rf PITQFIDi yxil.0lf.H il, BxrrnBF ANlt AIAN l.'lrllhillH
, 130fr , he[+rprl
, S tlnf, {firl
(ui
.)ri
whrrrrlrlnl x rlrfnir tlO FOnEru H,IIJh [OllO
{!onoI0o, oIqAnIo xtFlFT
ol tlrf r kl Crunu uf nflrl ltntr of r lllllllllti
Wll'NNNtll0'fll,'l'hll the lrnrtor lhr nrril hr uuuldsr tklt rrf tlro rrrrrr uf llarl dotrIarr rrtd gthar gocd aDd
ve l rrelrl r oortrlt|rr.eblorr Infl,l,Allli, rh$ reuollr nrrrl rrrffl$lgruy uf wlrluh h Inrdry
Courtly rtf IIOLE nlrl $tlto ul'Colrtrndo dorrrrlhod nr lirllowri
LOr 6,
tl.oox 6,
VAII{ INIIRXOUNIAIN DIVET.OPMENT TUDDIVI I ION
rooord[lq to thr rroordtd plrt tlrrnrof,
Lltu//:'
nt( t ) i\.ltJ(.t
Oetebaf
,' " r.1,
, r|i,"""" """.,' /itt.r,.'.,a',.,,'1"'
, '\ , ,111j1','j,' I
i,),1, k'fl,/rii;cD
(0/il / tl ot
f.,1"4 /(' rv'I lllilr ililr ililil llll lllll lllll llllll lllilll llll llll f?llfl l6l6all'aa Oltlfl lll lur flrh.f I tl I i lt,!l D !1,03 ll !,0! lrrh 00
nl*r krurwn hy rtroot lrrl rrurrrhpltrt 19 6 5 BEIJTFLOI{IR DnM , VAIL, 0O 8 16 ! ?
llB lffrldf, ltlt hsltt ur
ku/lul rtlrtltJ lri $ftt, lurlnht,
l'unIrglhl.|iil|t$$u|lt.bu|l|rrt,ts|cr,l|trl..tor*,st.i|giil|iigl||t.U|0|||blulolllld
flhorr ilttrrr l.t fortn l|i Siihlblt rA' ltttohrd hr*rto &d n-ds r $rt l[rlof r
'l'lrf lruiltilt ililil wlll lY lnANl'Y ANlr fr0[nYFt FBrllNl] thr nlilrvrhilr$rlls{l lrreilrlrur h llr! rlul0t iild lrsrru0||iln li'firsnurr
ol lflt oiltl ,ttfltW illl xlltl lYrrJ Fr"ru rtr lffi!,'rr! lfl]yllrll] |;l[liltlil! the wlilrl8 0r nil] rufl llEro0f' 1lri rhtgul$
I lh! flxril lln ilill||lnfr oflrl thr qi| of ffrI rl||tllhp nll $0dsn.
lrr llrr |rn ltlf ll{,r llt?tlllld lltl f|.rl "[ ll'.fllnrtFr ,J
Itrn rrl GOLOIIDO
l'lrirrrly nf ll€lf
t
) ,
)
Tho folr$lnl hrlrumcnt wm noknowl.dtnd hefurr mt thh
hy Jom po[6t0lDo rxD JTDEI FoREUfffDo
t"
lnal rlly lf
, Wiirrur illy llilrld fitxl lffipill mll, r
€-'-.\,t *, ,*.rt- l I L{L4!,,
My tiorrrrrrlrlirrrrilfhu S. & | "" ,l tj6-rii
, l9ft r
I]XHIFIT A
AEEapnrd Ep
t CIllTuQNDo ,
and nadr a perF of, hlarranEy Doarl fron rJoga FoRTUoNDo AEEY
Qrenl-sr(F) , tg FnANaINfl J, FnrlnRE r grantas(F) ,
A.l..I teiler fer yreF teefl, wnlph Era a llrn noF ysF pryah:I.n,
ReFEr.{gE,l,gilr FF EteEB'E[enF ggnFn+nnc dn tlr fl r PEFnnEET €r +n
AoFF rt|[herlrl'nrJ Ehr-+ttHansl Ehsrrsf I rrccrdrC F.pg.mbtF 10,
[eQ4 ,ln Fool( lAi at Fegc 3 rcrervlng t) nlghtr of tllr grroprl:rFor of A va.l.n or lode [o exEraot and Fanrove hdE crs Lharpfrpnr and fl) rdgh[n of; WRy for dltsheE ancl sanell
oonFErucrEed undef Ehe auElrorlLy ef Ehe Undted FEatap,
ReEtrlotlone, aF oontalned ln lnatrunent reoorded 'Iuly 14, 1.970 jn Boolc 3tB at PaEa e81 aH Rsoepglon No, 113879, end lnctrument
raoordEd Novamb6r 17, 1970 ln Eook e10 at Fage 130 aF Reoaptlon No. 114734, al,Ao af f Ldavl f resorded Aprl.l 10, 1,9?X I n noak ?20 at Peqa 97e EF ReoEptlon Ne. [16039, and Amendmanb rasordpd Apnll ?8, 1971 ln Book 320 At Pag6 390 aF Reoepflon No. 116034,
nAFenFntF, reetrlotlonp and rlghte-of-waye , lnsludlng but not llmlted go aaFFmBntF for utt.ll.Ey anrl rlralnege frurpoAFF 6 faat ln wldth along thg lnterlor IoE llnaa aF saE out on plaE
sncorldadl QsEsbeF I, 1970 ln B00h 118 f,t paqF 7gB HH RBs€Buleil
N8. 11,1{03,
flasemenE grenEccl Uo Upper AeEI6 Vel.loy EFnlEaulon Dlct}'lsE, by vall Intnrm0untaln isiEslates, ln uha lngtrunnnt rsoqrdscl
Augusl 7, 1070 tn B0sx li,B at FaEB ,117 aE nEogpl;l0n N0. 1l{008.
l|ll
rl
I I I
tl1[illlllJrtl||lt I'III r|[llilLllllllr I I
i i-ti,i6 o tl,oo ll o,oo lrrh oo
6pl Y'1t3lz
Tlllll llldl{ll, Mnrh tlrir rl0ll FOROUOI|DO f,lln
WARIIAN'NY DI{I4T)
lnd dny rrf Oeteb.r
trEEY pofiQuolto0 , leeF , hrtwtldfi
-}'-.
'- ^ 6t F./)Yrc T.(& :'S'00
IUIDtrVI'IO}I
th.E.ef,{$.
Y \\l
J
)m'
)
tHIllllLilHl!,tilLill|Jrlll l[llLilff |t|r ill |||l
i 5, I t lt.tt ! !l.lt ll t.al trrlr tt
.hy of
, ',rrirr".
, *it..'r"t" ' "' ..,
,i /Ittr,,",r,'t,,,'',"
'| '1 , I lrrlI J,lJt l,lr I
t{l|lltl
Tltr hlrnlnl ilrlr rn.rrl wnr ngl0ewldlrrl hrfurr mr thh
rv riorl iolfrgeilDo tt|D trry ForFUoxDO
My pnmrntrrton ul,tru S-,d /,, J(r{r",
v'l ll'$t
!,q Iri't 1il*
rufthr ukl (\ l0ryilf mdltfitg0f Fl{onIDl
rxrrorM 0, prFr&r AND AlnN PFillFill8
wltrrrnblrl lrlrltemh tlO IOmlO HIL$ EOID
00[0t{s0r 0I0mI0 ltptp?
of lhs $ld GDurrly rf erill lt$r of r lfn lPli
Wfl'Nl|illll'lllr 'l'lrfil lhrr lr{il|0t'fut nurl In g0ntklcrrthil 0f rltF ilIu 0f 0tn de l}rrr Ind cthrf geed md vilHrh r FFilr+flrrlttoil It0lJ,Alltr ilIfl rflrplilt iltrl ilfflt|l$iltl) ilf wltl|ih I lnrehy
$'{Iterl ltlr hlltr Irrrl
fJortrrty rtf InOIr!fil l ilfllF rtf g0l0ri.l0 rlii$rlhld fi llrlfurt?tl
ti00 6 |
BL00t( 6,
vf,IL l)t0nnxoux0t\Il| Dnvg&oFxt]t0
eooerC*ng to thr rteerdro plrt
llllltl lv t,t []flftit:frll lt dn ('nliiatrl$il
alm Inrrwu hy r.rt fin.l rnrrlrrrrn tf!l llll/TL0Wln DllV!, Vltl!, CO gla!7
rnrvu ol tlrr pnlfril, rilhrr
l||$$[|iTT'|t|t|tg|itnrimrir|i,l|ii|0ith*iilnoofl|i
rltilltfly$il,
lnwllt|nut|rrit|tylii1ll||l,|rlrrnl||.l8l|nrrderrrrvryitltllg|l
lirRti*l t,lj $tl$i il{$i|t,
0llgl3 nrttfst rs$ lcFtn m Hin$lt flf tttronrd li.drt0 rrid hrili
3 nrt lllrsstr
It'lll
HilI
AFID lj0ltllvE[ DH|IHNI] llls illlllli liiitr{i'idl ritiiirldr iir llii {rriui nrd rrindiilili nornminn
, l|ls lllt|rfll tllu ilii$lrr,
ilt||liulilll il|iil t'.jEt}l|lnril rtt [|!nrW Inwl'lllly uhhrilflit lltri $iiill$ 0t iiii rrrt llriflirf, rlhr ilriiulil
lt|rfll tlru rliiilulrr, il[ltlts l|fi 0f [[] ts[ilu.t|tell lis rirrillErlih;rull niilirr,fl||v nn,rlrrll lic iii|lil
, llrn ltnilt0r lM 0r|ttiutet| tlrll dul rrilln rhrgttstjfulh dhtvrt,
lt{lr ||f OOl.OilDo
froilnty nf I^eL;
h ld $l1l lllghl |o1, C.
ltlh tl$ fiollfll'(j| Ilfnul 'l'lllr t[ lfurb 0ilxltr' ltR
iliT*t wArMnI'Y lrfillr l]'tr ltxrturfhlo rl.i l
lnC lrca
Hl{tfrnIf+, l
AEUEohaC Fe
P0RTUONDo ,
end meCe e perE sf |{errenlty DepC frpm uOEB PORI'UONDO ADAY
QrantCIr(F) , [a FniNgINn ]T, PATnnA r Qr-antee(n) ,
Al1.l:axae for year lg00, w]ilqh ars A ]len lrot yel- peyahle,
Raetrlotlons oF exseBt*one pontai.nEd Ln U,E, FabenUH, or ln Itote authorlnlng tlre- .leeuanoe thereof , raoordad Esptember 98r
1s04 I.n Book ll3 nt Fago 3 rcntrvlng t) Rlghfn ef [hr
frrolrrl.tor of e vain or llode ts oxtFest and ranovl hl.r om tharellrom and 9) riEht,e of way for dltshea nnd oanalc
sonetrueted under the euthorlty of bhE Unlt,ed StaEee.
Rsrtnlatlons, ea oontatned ln InaBrument raoordad iluly 14, 1970
Ln Fook tl8 at Pega 101 aB nesoptlon No, ff387t, and l,netruncnt
rroorded Nevembnr 1,7, 19?0 In Ebole 119 at pAgo 1t0 ar nrecpt[on No. IL41s4, allo effldavj,t, r.soirdod lprll ,8, 1,071 {n Foolt ll0 rt Prqa 379 nr Rcoaptlon No. tt60l5, and Anendmant, rasordrd
AprJ,l 28, t07t ln Book e20 rt PrEo lto e! R.ooptlon No. L160l4,
Earementr, rerErlotlonr and rlghtr.of-wryr , lnolucllng but not llmltrd to 3a..moncr for utlLlty and dralnagt purpor.r 6 frtt ln wl0tlr elong the lntarlsr lot }lnar at FaU out on plet,
resorcleel ootober l, 1970 In nsok ZIE t'E peE. 799 al llooopttron N0, tL4405.
flerBlnenE qranuFd Ue UppFr negle Velley Fan{Ieglon plFurl.st, by Val* Inlerneunte{n t\F-eg+ntea, *n thr l.nrtFHnent Fecetrdrd
I\rtg$lu ?, +S?0 +n Feok e+8 at prgr 4r7 er nrecFt+on Nc, ||{00flr
Ltlllllfll',l, [|lldl'l,llltillltlllfilt|I[lrrrr
|||l
e
ZONE CHECK
Br..k[Ftu,c ./rtil \ftk' +a,/l
Phonc
Phonc
Allorvcd Existin e
=_\gM_ t*5x +
------...---rr:7:--7:
Proposcd "', AddMIM-
Buildablc
Total
l= fun
tg5l cRFA _ + gzs) (6Ts) =_h0 |
sHK"*--r-=-" (t2s) (67s+) - lY75
* 675 = 425 crcdit plus 250 addjtion
Docs this rcqucst involvc a 250 Ad dtnonl il(S -
Horv much of thc allorvcd 250 Addition is uscd with this rcoucst?
Lcpl
Addrxs
Grncr
Architctt
Zonc district
Lot sirc
Total GRFA
Rcmaining
tu$.
55,+
tul l
qe1
Proposcd
l,tlWtlrt
V/.
-(p
+
+
---.."...:_
ry17?,
4,al u/l
Sitc Cor.cratc
(fiq,U *'$t'ncrSot v
Sctbacks
Utnfu,{di',il,, tad\
bllt/or
Landscaping
RcLriningWall Hciglts
Parki ng
tnvh Eu)
Minimum
2t5(r b/)
(30x33)
Front
Sidcs
Rcar
20'
tt 4/'t tt.1 t 4.5
5l-{t5' 50'0la+
3'/ 6',
o 4 Required 4 Encloscd
Caragc Crcdit
Drivcrvay
Conrplics with TOV Liglring Ord.inancc
Arc finishcd gradcs lcss tlan 2:l (50%)
Envi ronm cnta L4{azards
(3oo)(600{9(r2oo)
Pcrmittcd Slope _%Proposcd Slopc 41.- u.
"ty'No
Ycs--j4- No
l) Pcrccnt Slopc (< >30%/?t/,
2) Floodplain
3) \Vctlands
4) Watcr Course Sctback (30)
5) Gcologic Hazards
b) RocKall
c) Dcbris Florv
Prcr'ious conditions of appmval (chcck propcrty filc);
Is thc propcrty non-conforming? Dcscribc:
\toiltilw frnrtdqtu/ot " u
, u^,, t In I qV,W
Uttlnt,hth h,h)
fu\l tuvwn+
l Wrr
r0*
ftH,4,w'6
e
Q SURVEY
-7
..rr:_
'"/
.;
:/
,/
J
Q FLooRPLAI,IS
CRFA
250 additional 0RFA
CrarvlWttic Spacc
EHU
Q BUILDn.IG ELEVATIoNS
Q SITEPLAN
Roof pitch
------:-@
Exr'sting trccs
Proposcd trccs
Lcgcnd
MISCELLANEOUS
Condo Approval
Titlc rcport (A & B)
Utility.vcrifi catiol form
Photos of sitc
Buil ding material samplcs
C.O. Vcriiication
Sun\Shadc Anglcs
Utiliti es (undcrground)
Vierv Corridors
Varianccs
Plat rcstrictions
/-f r DESIGNREVIEIV cmcKLrST
nroiccr: '(+{Lf,%
Scalc
Bcnchmark
Lcgal dcscription
Lot Sizc
Buildablc tuea
Eascmcnts
Topography
Environmen tal Hazards
Trees
Utility locations
Spot clcvations
Scalc
, / Encroachmcnts
Cangc conncction
Fcnccs
rarlang/uaragc
Tuming Radius
Scalc
Watcr Coursc Sctback
Sitc Covcrage
EavcVOvcrhangs (4)
Dccks/Balconics
lrivcrvay (access and gradf,
Firc Access
D e p artme n t of C ommun i ty Deve I opment
Qr
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 r 38
FAX 970-479-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
January 7,2002
Dominic Mauriello
PO Box 2658
Edwards, CO 81632
Fax: 92&7576
RE: Proposed remodel at 2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Dear Dominic:
The Community Development Department has reviewed the remodel for the Peters Chalet, located at
2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail lntermountain the following revisions must be made:
1. On the Landscape plan, the silver leaf dogwood and the dwarf mugo pine will need to be
removed. They will grow taller than 3 ft in height, which is not allowed per Town ol Vail
site distance standards. Option: Move planter area out of the site distance area, closer to
home. Please adjust and revise
2. On west side of garage, the planter behind the parking space will need to be removed to
allow vehicles to enter and exit. As orooosed it will not work. Please adiust and revise.
3. That the applicant submit a revocable right-of-way permit for all improvements located in
the drainage easemenl and right-of-way prior to submittal of the building permit. (at
building permit)
4. Please submit a site plan indicating roof ridge and eave elevalions. This was sheet H1 in
previous submittals.
5. A Type I EHU deed restriction will need to be filed prior to issuance of a building permit.
These comments must be addressed prior to linal Design Review approval. The Peters Chalet is
scheduled for lhe Design Review Board on February 6, 2002. Please submit the revisions by noon on
February 4,2002. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 970-479-
2369.
sinirfytv' /)
UlAW
Allison Ochs
Planner ll
Town of Vail
t2 *"n"uo 'u'*
O G**'"* ",t8;;;t li'j *"".0f
75 S. Ffontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Please make checks payable to the TOWN OF VAIL
No.iCode# Gost Each
001 00003141110
001 0000 3141112 Uniform Building Code - 1997 - Volqne 1&2
Torn of Vai i r** CUSTOIIER RECEIPT *r*
DATE: ?/C0l08 8l RECEIF,TT 9904667
* -_ DEscRIpTIon ory Arouu IF Tn Yrl _pEC UAftlAt{CE FEt I rASg.B0 *tV C(
t,ARIA}ICE REPORI
TE}II}ER DETAIL ct( l0a5
O DAIEz ?/?E/EE TItiE: 8:45:87 c lglll_-c!!gl_-__ risg.eg
; Ait]uilr TEilDERED r?50.08
IHANK Y{]U F(}R Y()UR PNYilENTI
01 0000 314 1112
1 0000 314 1112
100003141112
001 0000 314 1112
001 0000 3141112
001 0000 3141112
001 0000 314 1112
001 0000 3141112
001 0000 314 1112
001 0000 3141112
1 0000 314 121 r
001 0000 314 .t
1 11
001 00003141111
001 00003141111
001 0000 31s 3000
001 00003112300
001 0000 315 2000
001 0000 312 3000
001 0000 312 4000
001 0000 312 4000
001 0000 311 2200
001 0000 315 3000
001 0000 240 3300
1 0000 312 1000
001 0000 230 2000
'001 0000 201 1000
Taxable @ 4.004 (Town) - Fetall Sales Tar '001 0000 310 1100
001 0000 31.1 2500
001 0000 311 2500 Additional GRFA - "250'
001 0000 31 1 2500
1 0000 31 1 2500 Exterior Alteration - Less than 100
1 0000 3.1 1 2500 Exterior Alteration - More than 100
100003112500
001 0000 311 2500
001 0000 311 2s00
001 0000 311 2500
001 0000 311 2500
001 0000 311 2500
001 0000 319 3100
F:/Evervone/Forms,/Sal€sact.exe
oo rt r
a
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 t 38
FAX 970-479-2452
November 29.1999
. Peter Archer
Reinders and Associates
Unit I 201, 54 Cedar Pointc Drivc
Barrie, Ontario L4N 5R7
Re : the Peters Chalet / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intennottntain
Dear Peter:
Following are comments fi'om a prelirninary review of the plans for thc abovc-rcfcrenced project.
r Jhs minimum required setback from the centerline of Gorc Crcck is 50'. Any existing
improvements within this setback are "grandfathercd" but new construction must respect this
rcquircmcnt. Decks/balconies (>5' above gradc) may cxtend a distance of 5' while ten'aces
(0-5' above grade) may extend a distance of l0' into this setback.
' 'Ihe new construction appears to encroach on a plattcd utility easement. An encroachment
agrccmcnt from thc cascmcnt bcncficiary would be rcquired prior to building permit
lssuance.
' The maximum allowable site coverage on this site is 20')'o of total lot area. Site coverage is
csscntially any stlucturc with a roof (a 4' crcdit is granted fbr eave overhangs). Plcase verify
your proposed sitc coveragc does not exceed 209/o.
. Please provide a scale on all plans.
. A topographic surr,'ey will be rcquired as part of yoru-dcsign rcviclv subrrittal.
. .\s vou arc awarc, cnv nc\r' construcrion w,idrin thc sidc and ri'ont scrbacks rvill lcquile a
variancc.
A more detailed analysis will be conducted when atr application and design review submittal arc
received. If you would like to discuss this project in greater detail, pleasc contact mc at (970)
479-2140.
{S u"rr*r r^rr*
I
Sincerely.
L--4L'---- -"''-
Brent Wilson
Planner II
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 I 3 8/479-2 I 39
FAX 970-479-24s2
Department of Community Deve lopment
June 21, 1996
Jan Delain
2955 Bellflower Dr.
Vail, CO 81657 ----- '
'}-..-./?
f Rn: mt 6, Block 6, Vail lntermountain/29 5 Bellflower
Dear Jan:
Thank you for your inqury regarding the above-referenced property. The zoning for this
property (Primary/Secondary) allows for two units on a lot when certain standards are met. One
of those standards pertain to minimum lot area. Any lot in this zone district greater than 15,000
square feet is allowed two units on the property. Lots less than 15,000 are allowed one unit, with
the possibility to add a second unit, if that unit is deed restricted as Employee Housing.
Furthermore, if that second unit is sold separately from the primary unit, both units must be
restricted as Employee Housing.
Our rccords indicate that the above reference lot is less than 15,000 square feet. It is my
understanding that there are currently two units located on that lot, neither of which are restricted
as employee housing (even though they may cunently be used as such). In order for the units to
be owned separately, both units must comply with the Employee Housing regulations. For your
reference, I have included a copy ofthosc rcgulations. Please refer to the section regarding "Type
I" units.
lfyou have any further questions, please feel free to contact meat479-2128.
Sincerelv.
U/rr'a^'
Lauren Waterton
Planning Liaison Officer
{gr"n"uor*",
ll 't1 ,.
rtnt Project Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
vl
-4, )
Project Application 'D,r(<t.<t - /-o^" 1/ z : r/'l t)
-n
,7 lq - -/'J'-) L
,y'r,t4- 6, L 0
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded Dy:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
Town Planner
-- / -. , / r';,t Dale: / / 2- /i'rJ
.\st^tt Approval
Er.rtrNtK-J)a t
--_llaunt) I
R=o s'UlDED DecK A n-r-l U,tottt-p
oa/E s;rr.? tt? L-, A") Fr<4^*l-flrs MALKWAy De-c<
R.O suAD(o .A{'u tvo''rLD
Arso B€ Ar Tl. s,{{E
r3 -g
i '.r
lri
r-
&
J
t)-
r4n,
ffxl
or; ^t I
B€
jil
i;ql
qrit
ilr$
v]
J .s
ll
{v 5r)
: oQ
"z 3I aa-rr &,.I 4
t,,. {t_.,.L- . ir 'J f\, \
---i b
,i* x t-lo
../ X S', 'r'{ .--
<t
(g
l+r
KJ \o
li I tv r.l(.U
t,r1
,s ( r.1 r-l)
,5 (o
4l
.: r(\4 ac
r--l
Ltt/tt- AS '7zP .of
c Pinei*G fuR Dc-tvrilAy/
3 gucf, c/ece-\s (O )
Inrtlic,q-ns (elc(EIE P.rOS
5-r X r\
(fr
F
a
qrr
.q r{J
Q sc
>I
3
.\g ', \o w ?a
;d
q-:lrrEl
€( 151ir'.r c c.c itrtri e
=::::-:,----:--- f W I
{
"J Lf
'\J l
Ll tu
I
A
H
q ?
()
r.i
:.l--.<
)i
{-t qA
ffi
€:xrstln,'{' }6.. g
P4'/ '' t
I
4t^*-
l7r.l
F
l*!x
P
p
0\1'
t o
of D<c(
Frl t'lA
Ffua^ Tat
&,TfoJ.r cY 6't{-"
Ta
.€
{
e6ts1,@,
s730 38'OO"W
SGALE ' l"' 20'
5.UTILITY
EASEMENT
IherebycerEifychaEchisimproveuenElocacioncertlficaceraspreparedforthe
Eorcgage lender aod che ticle lnsurance coaPany ' chac lc'ls not e land survey plac
or LmproveEenc survey";laa,
-""a char Lc fs ioc- lo be relled upon for che escabllsh-
aenc of fence, buildin!, or other future folrovetent tft'"s' I furuher cercify chat
che inproveoenBs on iil'"Uorr" described partel or chis date, excePE uEllicy con-
neccions, are enctreiy=;;; ci"-uo""a"ii""-o r in. parcer, excepc as shonn, chat
. chere are no encroachoenEs uPon che described prenlses -by inprovenents on any ad-
Jolnlng prealses, "-;;;-;"-i;h."."a, and chai chere ls no aPParen. evidence or
sign of any easeBen!
-""r""t"g or burdening any par! of said parcel, excePE as noEed'
ThiscertlficaEedoesnocconsEiEuEea!lclesearchbylncer-ountainEnglneering
to deteroine otr"r"tip--it """tt""t" -of record' For all inforoarlon regarding
easetnencs, rrgncs-or^-Ia;'";-;i;i;-;r-r""o.a, rnEer-MounEain Engineerlng relled
upon|hcF|no|P|o|or-e|,ocr-e,Vo|||ntrmourrtointhw|ogmcntsubdivil|on.
s'unr-nv
EASET{ENT
R= lOO.oO' /
A: l8o5l'OOu
L = 329'
Ch. 32.75'
3 76P55'22'W
se5o$
s80e4l
EELLFLOWER DR. (5O')
IMPROVEMENT LOCATpN CERTIFICATE o r-F#sffi=.-*=€Hffi 9/ lo/85 ' Lor 6' BLOCK 6,
vAlL |NTERIil}UNTAIN DEVELOPMENT SUEDlVlsloN'
EAGLE CO'JNTY, COLORADO
GREEN 8€LT PEDESTRIAN 8
422575 ,-$t..;
=i.=
22575 =i=
%rrr',,'u**tS
5
. PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Design Review Board of the Town of Vail
wil] ho'ld a public hearing at 2:00 pm on NQvember 2, ]983 in the Counc'il
Chambers in the Vail l'lunicipal Building in order to consider a request
to build a secondary unit on Lot 6, B'lock 6, Vail Intermountain Subdivision.
Appl'icant: Susan Corrock Husted
Information concerning the application is available at the office of
Corununity Development in the Municipal Buildjng during regular business hours.
TOI^JN 0F VAIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
JIM SAYRE
Town Planner
Published in the Vail Trail October 2],1983,
{'.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Comrnission
Community Devel opment Department
0ctober 20, 1983
Request for a variance from section r9.13.080 (B)(4) in the primary
fS..g.4gfy-zone in.grqef not to build a two car garage on Lot 6, Bl6ck 6,rnrermountain subdivi s ion, which is tesi"itri, t d,bOd-squaii -feet.
Applicant: Susan Corrock Husted
DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED
The applicant, Susan Husted, wishes to add a second unit to her existing single fami]y residence at 2955 Bellflower in ilest vail. In order to add a second dwelling unit on this small lot, the requirements or le.ii.oso(Bi-rust-ue'iatisfied.Two paragraphs 'in this section ire periinent to the diicussion:
(3) That no variances,for setbacks, height, parking.....wou'r d be approved unless the qranting of such a variance binefiti the visual applir"anc"of the site-and sri"ornaing u""i.
(4) That fifty percent of the required parking be enclosed
Four stalls are required for two units, thus the regurations cail for a two-car garage. The issues to be confronted_by the plannlng commission-u"J [ij whether the variance is justified and (II)-whethe"-it" iuiiunce benefits the.,.-.-,.visual appearance of the site. The oeiign Rev.iew Board wi'l I make the decision whether a second unjt is appropriate.
I. VARIANCE
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
n review of Criteria and Fi ndi n s, Section 18.62.060 of the Muni al Code,epartment of Communit evel o ment recommends approva of uest vartance based upon the fo owi n actors:
Consideration of Factors
fhe fglationship of, the requested va"ia and structureffi
It would be verv difficult to build a two.car garage on this lot. Building the.garage to t-he front of the house would require a front and side setback variance and would destroy the front facade of the t'our.. - o"ueiopreri-io-irr"rear of the lot is not a viable alternative due to i ir,inge or grbae ini-il,"-greenbeit and utility easement adjacent to Gore creJt. i6ere is 15 feet between
the exist'ing residence and the a two car garage is usually 20 utility easement and a |5 ioot on the westerly portion of the
Even if there were enough room to the garage would tend to overcrowd
space between the Husted residence
Lot 6, nrocr< $rmountain -z- to/?o/83
utility.easement a'long the westerly lot line;feet wide. The abandonment of the-five foot side setback variance would be required to build
I ot.
build a
the lot
and the
two.car garage over the existing park.i ng,and would impair the common open residence to the west,
The de to which relief f19m the strict or I itera l inte retation and enforcement 0fas regulation is necessary to ac eve tya un rmi t of.lreatment amongffi attai n objecti ves of is title without qranm
To grant this variance would not constitute a grant next door neighbors to the east, Craig and Jan Webb,in August, l98l . The Webbs have writien a letter in as has the_neighbor to the west, Judy Hayhurst, and street, Jeff Frederick. (See attachiO titters.;
of special privilege. The
received a similar variance
support of the variance
the neighbor across the
Jhe.-gffect-9f the requested variance on light and a.i r, distributio-!__qJ population,transportation u
susan Husted and Judy Haysurst !9!_push their snow to the rear of the rot,facilitating snow removaj on Berfrbwer Drive. n giiade-worla io*iiicuii'rno"removal .
ll3! 9t!er factors and criteria as the commission deems applicab'le to the proposed var l ance .
II. THE VARIANCE AND VISUAL CHARACTER
The question now arises whether the variance will benefit the visual character ot !!e area.--A garage would.destroy the.open_space between the Hustea inJ-iaynurst res jdence. Also, the entry to the ilusted i^esidbnce *orrJ-iiuv. to be-ieir;ung".J'and the design sorution might welr be strained. susan ttusled has agreea to''--pave her existing parking lot, and this witt improve-tne-viiuar app6arance-or the site.
Lot 6, srr olmtn -3- l0/zol83
FI NDI NGS
The Planninq and Environmental Commission shall male the following findings be grantinq a vari
That the granting of the variance wilI not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties clissified in the same djsirict.
That the grant'ing of the variance will not be detrimental to the publjc health,safety, or welfare, oi materially injurious to properties or imprbvements in the
vi ci ni ty.
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the foilowing reasons:
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation
wqy]d resu'lt in.practical difficuity or unnecessary physical hardship inionsistent with the objectives of this title.
There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appljcable to the site of the vari ance that dd not apply generally to other properties in the
same zone.
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of othei properties in the same district.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff recommends.approval of the variance. The decision to recommend approval was a difficult one due to the policy of encouraging garages in the West Vaii area.0n the other hand, the town.is encouraging employee-housing. But there are physical constraints concerning. building the garage, and the neighbors support the variince,two factors which weigh heavi'ly upon the decision.
The variance not to build the.galgSe is contingent upon the Design Review Board decision to grant the second dwelling unit. The DRB should careiully review:
l. Parking on this small lot
2. Access to the second unit
3. Storage of trash and other materials
a
r, susan corrock Husted, arn requesting a variance of the parklng regulatlon and. requlrenents for a prinary - "u"oid"ry resid.ence. Th; regulatlon states that for a prirnary - secondary.awellini, 5M of the requlred garklng nust be enclosed' r an requestlng the varlince for the follorlng reasons:
1' r feel that a- perrnanent parking structure would not enhance rry hone, rather 1t would crowd the area. rhe ray ry to^" slts on the lot' my only optiorr f_or the gara€e wour.d. be tl ti,iia 1t right up to the restern property 1ine, therely "ro"al"s ;";;; space tretween my horne and rny neighbor.
.2. A garage would nake snow renoval dlfficult. Rlght now, f have tbe snor pushed to the north end oi*y plrii"g area, out of the way of the street. This nernod crl. snow renoval would be ' irnpossible with a garage and an arternate method roura be 1ike1y to add nore snor problerns to an already nanox "t""ut.3' T-o "aa a garage to ny horne woul. d.estroy the present entrance of the horne. I,h1ve,a window in ny entry traff tiat would. end up ' rooking right in to.the garage and. wou'd. not be preasing. A1so,the roof line over the present entry would have io be changed to acconodate the grr"g. which rould. .create a najor expense for ne and one that would be difficult.
4' Every horne in -rny nelghborhood. is already- duplex or prinary - second.ary and not ott. ?f.thern-has a garage. t feet trrat consiaering lot sizes ln fnternountain an. tfre totaf-fack of gara€es, or,.-o' my property . would be inconslstent.
5. I would also like to note that ny next door neighbor, Cralg l{ebb,resid.ing aL 2953 Beil-flower asked for.and. was ei;i"a a parking variance last sunner. His hone is p"il;+ ;;";;d";, very sini.lar to what r rlsh. to_99.
_ His request was tdenticar-io"mine and was
Pqr"gd to by the pEf, that a pe-rnanent structure rould not enhance hls hone.
ELease. flnd acconpanyilg this application letters from the a,il.jacent property olrners supporting nry re-quest for a variance.
Thank you.
i
l{r. Jeff Fredertck
2962 Bellflower
P0 3ox 414
Vai1, C0 81558
Septernber 26, 1983
To the PEC,
r support susan Hustedrs request that a parking variance be granted for her horne. r feel that a garage would not be a benefit and woul_d. not lnprove either her lot or the neighborhood.
susan and r have been neighbors slnce she built her horyre in 19?8. r,re have never had any conflicts_with parki.ng.. i" u"ua;e"=ie wourd., in my opinion, create rnore problerns in the winter with snoi refiova.r ana would. not lnprove the snow renoval situation.
Please consider this letter 1n support of Susan.
Thank you,
?
Cralg & Jan llebb
P0 Box 591 ZIJJ Bellflorer yai1, C0 81658
Septenber ZZ, I9B3
Dear Sirs,
o,' nelghbor, susi-e Husted., has notrfied us that she is seeklng a parking variance. I{e a:re nrittng this letter rn support oiln" varia^nce.
rn. our. op5-nion, a perrnanent parking structure on susiers property woulcl not enhance elther her home ot the-neighborhood. As was ile case rrtn our horne, ne feer that a pennanent structure would. crowd her hone. she seems to have plenty of. off street parking. _ In our one year of livlng next d.oor to susie, re have never hLd a problen nlth her cars or ,,ith vlsltors cars, even when tbe snow was at lt,s rorst.
l{e hope you consider susie's variance applieation favorably. Jan and r are 1n agreenent with what she is attenliini to ao.
Si naa-ol.'
lfe applieil for and received the sane 1982. Both Jan and. I.feel that her
variance when we built our hone in situation resembles ours.
/'-ft
Craig & Jan Webb
Cedar Mountaln Constructlon Co.997I n. fd.a place
EngJ.ewood CO 90111
September ZI , Igg3
Va1l Fanning & Envirorunental Cornrnission Town of Vail Offlces
Va11, C0 81558 l
Slrs r
ft is my understand.i:fl.:l.l my neighbor at 2955 Bellflower, Susan Husted,ts applving ror a parki,rs .r"rian"er neeurati;; ;;il;";iii
"n" nust have :K':: l:l ::;:i13.:l;*;:l-*i-' n"'il1+z"""ona"'v-i;"iil;u. she is
It ts my feeline. ":_h:i::ll door neighbor, that a permenent structure would not enhanle her property and in iact be a nuisance for both of us.Drrins the winter months, boti il;";""; r plow ;;il;i;.ilys and the snow soes straisht forward and. out "i-;;; "* "r-th" ;;;";:.-ii.r,r"u,, were to :*"il; fl 3ll-1"i3l ;,::t*J;;g.f n:$.r;*d:
ui*po'l
"iu u tr," "" uy
-
A10ng with the snow rernoval- probrern, r feer that an additional structure would crowd the open. space betwe"r, i,n" ir.ro hones. Since there are no fi"ff::"i" anv of rnterrnounta:-tr, " g;""ge on her rot woulJ'-seen out
l"l:tiri:t#;t3::"59"r conslderation or these polnts. Both susan and r feel thrt'.-""J.i-ili:"1"::';fi"1"::J:*i::yilit ;jr'rlirl$L. t,ful1y support Susan in he:re ;;;;"; ioi'" p."iing variance.
ffiak,,,b(_
Cedar Mountain Constnrction Company
ccl Ms. Susan Husted Mr. 8111 Roudebush Mr. Deane Sargent
-a.s 3.5; .r i['5 's E 6,P1-rtrtrO |q H I .r{ 3-C E E o X'o O-ui RfitlJF{C oO H..{t4 >(tH+JOt F{3 Od lL-O t{ d,Flo o +,,Xtt O.t k Ff (t qrO llrF| O t{>A o tt' o =i t{.Ft."l c, tr o 5 f{.c.qtH O o ao+r.lto('d
t\o
FI H d o H
14 H
E-r x
frl U
H
Fl d
C)
3
Fr z
H
B o &A E H
-o
lo
E o
E
bJ
=tL
lrj o
tt o o
@
at,
Li)
'ot
il
t![
dl
F)
gl-ti
E,<J6 V'
6,','I o o
6 n F -z -u
==Jt!-v,
=<J lrl -ro
,\\;.w
FI 9 | )-''
F z,lr,
=lrl
U'
lrJ
tr J
=
6
z 3 E F 6 lr,o
H
F J lrl @ z
lrJ
lrJ E (,
o q'
6
.D
-1 -'' '<r
-. l'
i'--
(.'.1
l
5
--l
tp | '.
t'
r'o
I
,-n
:?'\.,-.--'\ a \\rr\\'(_\\\ _(.
! /\I 'Jt !\
\,rl '1 \
I
I
Ip lrJ
t!'
t-
t
ja)
0r
+
AA
f -,-
6 -l
Cn
\\it \ -''':z..
-...--..
t\-r-
o)
n-
()
4o<v4
__=_._
75 south trontage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000 oftlce of communltt/ developmenf
November 3, l9g3
(
Susan Corrock Husted P. 0. Box 3583 Vail, Co. 81658
Dear Ms. flusted,
0n November 2, Igg3,..the Design Review Board approved the second unit for Lot 6, Block 6, vait i;i;;;";;i;in srooivirion.
You should meet wi'th,Lamy. Eskwith, the.Town Attorney, in order to write the languaoe restricting itre itcoili ,l',iit into your deed restrictions.The deadline for paving your J"iu.*.v"i, September l, lgg4.
Sincerely,
Jim Sayre
Design Review Board
Town of Vail
75 South Frontaqe Road Vail, Colorado,'g1657
JS/rme
{* r:k r, *,,,,,#oJn R y u N r l' I
: 0 r r r. ()' t' s o F L r s s #
SQUARE FEE'| IN TllE RESIDI:NTIAL ZONI; DISTRICT A|lD lN
PRIII.\RY/SECONDARY RESID[N]'TAL ZONE DISTRICT
I 5, (){}0
11lt:
|l.s{e I. A. NAME OF PETITIONER
B,NAl,,tE OF
ADDRESS
-n PETTTToNER'S REPRESENTATIVE >g\+
\ PHONE
(type or p"rntt Suso^ Gecc.t-$u$ d c.NAME OF OI,INER
SIGIIATURE
ADDRESS
D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS
AI
f{ f-*' iole. FEE:
tf | ,tl v , sl t-l
't
the
to
then current first-class Postage
be notified herewtder.
F.A list of the names and
adjacent to the subject
II. CRITERIA
The Comnunity DeveloOnent Departnent and Design Review Board nay grant an
exception to allow the addition of a second dwelling unit if the following
criteria are net :
l. the second unit shall not excced forty percent of the total GRFA allowed
on the lot; and
2. The Conrnunity Devcloprncnt DL.pxrtne.nt shall find thrtt thc' granting of
the except ion will not be' clct rinre'ntal to the publ ic n!'lt'rlre or injuriotts
to other pr.opcrty in thc ar(.1 in which the subjcct propq'11y is situirtc(l , rrnd
3-. Thet no vrrri:urcc.s for sc.tbucks, ht'ight, p rking, sitc e r)vcrage or lattrlsclttritrE,-.-- site dcvt loplll('llt or gross Ir.sirlr,'ttt i:rl t'lt'ror il r('.t Notll(l l)d apProvcd tllll('sJ
thc grurtt irrg trl' such ir vr.rl.ilrttc,.' lr\'tl('l'if s 'thc vistrlri irl)i,(' lt'3ltce of tlrr'
site 3nd surrotttrdittg itl'cili illlr'l
rEGAL DEscRrprrON: r,ot (n Brock-(q- Filinc uq,.0 {r\+crnottA+
$100 plus an amount equal to
rate for each property owner
mailing addresses of owners of all ProPerty
property.
't-*t
Application for Secotrry Unit -2-J'
4. That fifty percent of the required parking ntrst be enclosed, and
5. The architectural. design of the structure and the naterials and colors
rnrst be visually harnonious with their sites and with surrounding sites
and structures, and must not unnecessarily block scenic views fron existing
buildings; and
6, Access to the secondary unit nust not adversely affect the privacy of
adjacent structures; and .]
7, The applicant must demonstrate that the site has the ability to double its capacity for handling trash and outdoor storage.
III. RESTRICTIONS
Pursuant to Ordinance 22, Series of 1981 of the Town of Vail , prior to issuance of a building permit, an agreenent to the following conditions nust be signed
by the property owner or owners on a form provided by the Departnent of
Comnunity Developnent :
1. That the secondary dwelling unit shall not be sold, transferred or conveyed
separately frorn the prinary unit for a period of not less than the life of Trent Willian Ruder, a life in being, plus twenty-one (21) years fron
the date that the Certificate of Occupancy is issued for said second unit, and
2, That the secondary dwelling unit shall not be leased or rented for any
period of less than thirty (30) consecutive days, and that if it shall
be rented, it shall be rented only to tenants who are full tine enrployees in the Upper Eagle Valley. The 'lUpper Eagle Valleyr, shal1 be deened to include the Gore Valley, Minturn, Red Cliff, Gilnan, Eagle-Vail , and
Avon and their surrounding areas. A rrfull-tine enployee" is a person
who works an average of thirty (30) hours per week, and
3. That the secondary dwelling unit shall not be divided into any forn.of
timeshares, interval ownership or fractional fee, and
4. That a declaration of covenants and restrictions shall be fited of record in the office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder in a forn approved
by the Town Attorney for the benefit of the Town to insure that the restrictions herein shall run wit.h the land.
IV. TrME REQgTREM_ENTS
The Design Review Board neets on the lst, 3rd, and Sth Wednesdays of
each month. The proposed plan and all requi.red naterials nust be submitted
17 days prior to the date of the neering.
i
)
s
Pursuant to Ordinance 22, Series of 1981 , of the Town of
Subdivision, do hereby agree that:
The secondary dwelling unit shall not be sold, transferred or conveyed
separately from the prirnary unit for a period of not less than the life
of Trent Williarn Ruder, a life in being, plus twenty-one (21) years from
the date that the Certificate of Occupancy is issued for said second unit, and
Ihe secondary dwelling unit shall not be leased or rented for any period
of less than thirty (30) consecutj.ve days, and thai if it shall be rented,
it shall be rented only to tenant s who are full tine ernployees in the
Upper Eagle Valley. The f'Upper Eagle Val ley" shall be deemed to include
the Gore Valley, Minturn, Red Cliff, Gilman, Eagle-Vail , and Avon and
their surrounding areas. A trfull-tilre enployee[ is a person who works
€rn average of thirty (30) hours per week, and
3. the secondary dwelling unit shall not be divided into any form of timeshares,
. interval ownership or fractional fee, and
4, A declaration of covenants and restrictions shall be filed of record
irr the Office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder in a forn approved
by the Town Attorney for the benefit of the Town to insure that the
rrestrictions herein shall run with the land. The recording shall occur
prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for said rxrit.
Vail, I,
undersigned, as owner oe Lot-..{6-, Block-(!--,
1.
J
Owner
Acljacent property owners to lot 5 b1ock6 fnte::nountain
l4r. Jeff Freilerlck
2952 Seuflower
P0 3ox 414
VaIL CO 8!658
I.,ot I Block 6
Cr.alg & Jan llebb
P0 3ox 591
2953 Bellflower
VaIl CI 81658 Iot 5 Block 6
Cedar Mountal-n Constructlon C0
I{rs. Judy Hayhurst
2963 SeUflower
9971 E. IcIa Place
Englewood, CO 80111
Lot ? Etock 5
Iot -L Btock 5
(0 ({
...?,, a/-r,/ , .l': f t s
J-.'''F
"./.- '" t I .-l
{
r.
I
WI
Application D
APPLICATION FORM FOR A VARIANCE
This procedure is required for any project reguesLing a Variance.
The application will not be accepted untiL all information is submitted.
A. NAMq OF APPLICANT
ooo*r,ss Q.O, 8o.c 358: - aoSS GeJ\Q'ln,Se<- puownll_bloEe
NA},IE OF APPT-,ICANT I S REPRESENTATIVE
ADDRESS
Se-\{B.
c.
PHONE
.NAME OF Ot,lNER
SIGNATURE
(type or p";nt) €usan Coaro& d\ursled
aoonrss 3oy SSts [o,\ p"o*ug]G-qoto
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAI
ooo*"rr QQS5 Be\$\o\r:er- - \q,,\
rir ir,s \la.$ {th{e,cm or o*+0r LEGAL DESCRIPUON 1ot (0b
E. FEE. groo. oo -- / /16/r.
lock-(q-
:.
F- A list of the names of owners of ar1 property ad.jacent to the subject property and their mailing addresies,-
C"qf * \on U:etu
sqsS tsb\t€\o."e<
Sorr sql Laf s Bio"* 6
\oJ$,G.
\^..q$ trardtziolq
u* -9"fi FrtrdEreic(
Ceda< l.t', funs{ G
&qUa Be-\\Qawe<-
Ro, gor rtt.t
\lc^i\, G. 8t65t
Ht.6ifl tuufuuusL-
l{t-. Oeone Socqe1ol
Nr . $,mes ttoy"h,.rsl
tl?r E. tJro' Pl".c-',.
rl Pn3rcO@d r1e, g'Otll
&!ue Bolflour<- t^d ? B\oot- t"
.ril^ i0,,./ to/. t ?<
Lo.l rro 6tock 6
<- Gdo. ttfn Gn* G
\q+t E. lu- P\c c-c
Enqh.oooA, Cq.
l.r" ff €\oc. 6
I, Susan Corrock Husted, an requestlng a variance of the parklng regulatlon
anil requirenents for a prlnary - second.ar;r residence. rhe regulatlon states that for a prinary - second.ary dwelling, 5% of the requlred parklng must
be enclosed.. I am requestlng the varlance for the followlng reasons:
1. I feel that a per:nanent parklng structure wou1d. not enhance ny
home, rather lt xould crowd the area. the way ny hone slts on the 1ot, nry only optlon for the gara€e woul_tl be to build it rlght up to
the western property 1lne, thereby crowcllng the open space between
ny hone and ny nelghbor.
2, A garage would make snow renoval dlfficult. Right now, f
have the snor pushed to the nbrth end. of rny parking area, out of the way of the street. Ihis me thoct of snow renoval rould be lnpossible nith a garage and an alternate rnethod would be likely to adii nore snow problens to an already narrow street.
3, To add a garage to ny hone would destroy the present entrance of the home. I have a rlndow in rny entry haI1 that would end up looking right tn to the gara€e and would not be pleaslng. A1so,the roof line over the present entry r+ou1d have to be changed to acconodate the garage which woultl create a najor erpense for ne
and one that woulcl be difficult.
+. Every hone in my neighborhood. is already duplex or primary - secondary
and not one of then has a garsge. I feel that considering 1ot si-zes . ln Inte:srountain and the total lack of garages, one on ny property
would. be inconsi-stent.
5, I would. also like to note that rny next d.oor ne16hbor, Cralg I'lebb,
reslcllng at 2953 Bellflower asked for and was granted. a parking
variance last suruner. His hone ls primary secondary, very sinilar to what I wish to do. Hls request was identical to ntne and" was
a€reed to by the PEU that a pernanent structure nould not enhance hls home.
Please find acconpanylng this applicatlon letters fron the adjacent property owners supportlng ny request for a variance.
Itrank you.
\
l'il
t9
i??
tdEE *:-8.
or\
o9
es
3.;.
{(.r!
(.
ql
m r r .I
=m v
I 3
UI
o_
ln l,i- -
(r
DOOrtrtOul 4 IOH oo|nt:'H6:l trl3 n I o P.r,.tt P. lE rd gO!, |,|'<o lF: rd HOPE OO IHO !| r- ft t5 o< r,. l>., <.tO oP o lHtrl orr.rrJ!,lJ{ loB P t O.f l"l !r.r ll, li <xF.n ooo IAZ I H.r t, t lli, ts o o o< o o 3 (: I ila r. ottt,o lOts OIJHE('tu4 I'rrO { A P.H< o.t I O Ad 5D. F. lo It . OH.orf tt Fr' ICH aUlo!,<< l! li 3U Ht l<o ,zfot1 I <O5.t IHZ O. Oo o:l I<rr < Hrtr n,l,OoOit rr dJEltE9,O OlloOHrfFlO l'{o 5 ttorfSortC O!' Ul . OOJrt Or t g':'cB crdrroo o o o I gt ltH oarD(), o o oou d !!,;'Orr:tttr<rt flr 3 3:tO O O oooD, ou H I l rr P.n t U rt.i i t' :r tnot/!.f€OoO o :tH FnX f i' tto o o < 3 O{ r'l < = r,.o Po< O It O B o ! P.o o 4 F.O O tf O H o Q!,i'55(!lO lrFrro. O ll| I rt lJ.o d 5 fl o o Po }l fr | 5 P.o ftll Etro ta, J O O rt 0, tQ rr rr r 5 lt o tP.F.It a oo o El o E P!' 'd t O< lLc 5:rE . A P..f Oo O P.lLl P- n <o t o o tro o o 5tood o o o p!' {D < r..rf F. 5 l, f,.o o o o.r 6 | 5 rio O.,|.t,
I
'-w;-.*
tn
oC)9-
o>tA
Qo --a
?
.9rtl z 3o z
EH gn z 6)
E5 ot{
H-'r@
!g ol fir ,-
ES <=m'l -z -{i otr
=*e=
r=ln
FP Fto oI 9n|g=
=-r <3n
-c aE ds b<vg!
Ee
o o
o
o
a
\q"
\\.+r)i i ----
/--/' I
\---------' * \ 'v:'')'-'-'' I r' )?' I 1(l J: 'r<--'-
|--t; ', q
I i J 'r.-----\, a
I \" '.t{--'l n\ I l' -.-. \ ti\
I r \" \ \
I
[ \ ,-.--t''-: --]l' Y--"--'
t --<rc' I F ,---.-' r n:
7A
7)
o I*
{)
lD
a-
L)
-{
I
.o
P
4 u
I
-r
Q o
n-
()
n I
rD
P -'i
o
a
-4-
a )
t
;el
(tl
L."
o
o
a o
:/-\ ;
th
o ,\-
o a
5
o
,A LC
a-
{-'
4 a
p
w
rrl
-n
-fl
^-
o
2
PEc 10/23 -8-
-!
7.uest for a conditional use ennit to allow a car wash in the Voliter ursery qara
stri ct.
it
an
nq at Sout Fronta Road in the rteri a s i ness c regg Ga CS v
The vote was una
on Lot gck 6, Intermountain w +L avi to cons cove red ar 'ln pl icant: SuGnTorroil Hus te
Jim SayrE ining why the site can't a garage
s finish off a basement-with entry modiii;;i;;;;:1:: !".:ltting constrainti and'e;ftiftj nuwturilrgna-bifs. Husted is finishing
Iofqa-t moved _g!_d_ Donovan seconded to rove the uest and the vote was .^.---=---6-0 in favor. PrGrce ds[e<I=fhelTaff to DRB to
Donovan trash situations.
Jim Sayre outlined the proposal as in the memo. He said that the applicant had
..agreed to the conditions except.for pav.ing. The conditionii -uie-0u56;iil;; ;;;""to upgrade the property"--needed to be adiressed. iiipuiitions of ipprovui ,r"""l. Build a berm and plant at least 20.g'-I,gy"fsreen trees with DRB approval 2- The number of exterior parking stalls be limiieJ-lo-a maximum of roll iiirrs 3. Pave the area to the noith of-the car wash out to-in" o"r,
Piper asked about exterior improvements and Sayre_explained that this was being done now, but Voliter, had not'agreed to paving-. rne'appiiiant explainea-tfiii'paving would conflict with the-nursery-function. Ra[son staibh it,ut cu" wash water would nake the lot muddv- Galles stated that he didn't trave-itre power to agree to paving because he did noi own the property. -t'to"gan
was concerned irrat there not be any outside use of the car wash. Pierte felt-that anvtlins woura improve [r'" p"op"i.tv,but he didn't want to.see cars parking outside "aiijng'tJ-get into oavi,-ni slggesteo that gravel might work as well is paving. piper feit thii at leasfthe toi iirouta be graveled. Donovan asked about having a lobp in the riaate to increase ihe landscape opportunities,.possibly having 6ittrer baving or iinascaping ln-iront-of the shop. Rapson wanted to see a beim betweeir the-entrance and the exit.
Il"ll ryl:! for_approval with the forlowing conditions: 20 foot long benn with 5'-l'evergreens' and provide four parking spaces. The motion failei for lici of a second.
Donovan moved and Pierce seconded to approve the request per the staff memo but l. a berm be built and at'l east zo s,'-7i-"u""gr""r,"ii""t'irunted to screen the parki ng
2. The number of exterior parking spaces be limited to a maximum of four.3' All work associated with the detail shop shall take place inside the garage.
4. Exterior renovation - siding and paint- of the garage be completed 5' That the entire park'ing lot in front of the garage building be either graveled or I andscaoed.
6. The conditional use permit for the detail shop is granted for a per.iod not to exceed one year. Mr..Galles should appear uetoie itre plannin!-ana rnvironmentat Commission at their second meeting of 0ctbber, fgg+. Mr. Galles-should make application in the month of Septefrber, 19g4.
di
++:#:l l_y"li.lS. BJ in order to add a s
carefully.review the part<ing ana move9 and Trout seconded tiat pi
tel I
Vice yote was unanimous.
r be nominated for Chairman, and Viele
t'PEC rclJ -t-
she suggested working within the Arterial Business District ignll,S. Rapson ag i:lf.ji:,,t:':;J'1,3:::l:: 9j:rjl:,,""':*:^;:t";i-ryiii"'i"'iiiil"iil3'"lloi?',f,3 iilrlliill;":10',::ynu'l:l illl ryllup' *,""u wis i ;;;;;;; ;i;: ;::dil';o";.[!
Arterial Business District *u; ;-il;;;r"zone for the tot.l1;":i:l.H::ll^::"1:^.!j:,"1r ;,;;; rra, ir,--u,ir.=' ii"nui suggested that the
Brooks requested to table his
tr Hatami sussested redlging.the hejsht to p:Il1?:,31 l:"1... piper stated that perhap3 affordable housinq was not an issie noru,'rrggurted that ther! was too much parking
I:1".1; BTili::j^:t'S::"i::i:f;-!lli,i1""..shourd be pedesrnan access rrom the area to pirkin creek park condos, and did-not-iii""-tr'o firin"ii.iiiir:";;il ;;:*r,:!i.He did not feel there was too mucn-oi i probrem with the traffic.
ggqqnded to table Pierce moved and Donovan
6.uest to delete the sed ice rink laza buildi and ac nq wal ks sta'i rs , and retai n wa s tor the and Park Tow at Ueve lo ve I opement District #ll. Appl i cant :estern Federa Savings an oan ssoci ation
Morqan moved and Pierce seconded to rove the uest with the condition that sub drains be i nstal I ed as r the slaff memo ind TIET-ThE nstaile rior to the SSUance o a tlnal cert cate ot occ up a nc on the present construct buildinqs an befo new bui rmi ts we re ssued e rema lnoer 0 p roperty.
Peter Patten went through the history of the project. l2 of the 34 units had been built and recreation rairiltiei u,""!'to.serve both existing and planned units.Now the phases.have split ownershipl-ii,ir is.a joint application to remove rec facilities' Both |desiern Federil'Suuingt and l6in'inJ-iri-rnu"rtments were the appl icants.
The proposed rec facil.ities are in geologic hazardous area. The Town now has more detailed geoiosic studies than when'in" 5oo nii-upp"6ruo]-'prc should look at rec facilities when ievisign: t9 ouplei ioir u"" reviewed. patten added that claycomb Engineering had suogested that iuul"uini u"-uriii-io-ritigiru groundwater probtems.The staff was asking for one .onJiiion ,pgn,approvat, inii-or subdrains being bu.ilt as per the Claycomb report of Aujust-iZ, fgeZ.
Dave Peel' representwng IKs, indicated that they had a joint application and thar subdrains would be built pei ttte siuJi"i. Recre"atrjo" irlriiiur fees were discussed,with the conclusion that they
"oriJ-niuu to be paid. -oonovan felt that there should be some recreation amenity th""e-iuct'-ii a_tot iot. piiien suggested that it would be appropriate to look, at-atternaiive iec facfriii;r il;;"the auptex tot apptication came in. Larrv Eskwith wondered-how-to-keep-""i-iiiii;;i";'in the plan if they are deleted at the present-time. Jit-t'to"gun.gskeg tne ippiicants if they wouid be willing to contribute $10,000 to'it"-rec aiiliicil-anl'ihu representative from western Federar answered ttrai tneir.oit"iurtjon came in by prov.iding sub drains.
Rapson asked if some of the rand mitigated by. subdrains wourd be made geologicalry
:;l:;",:iisl 3l i;:r:il"l.o""u,,tui"i-ir,ut ir,.-io,n.;;,;; opportunit! to ii,nit
proposal
The vote
unti I
was 6-0
November 28.to tabl e.
be some recFeatr-on-al ameniTlE such as a tot |ot on the pro.ject.
The vote was 5 in favor and I Donovan aqainst.Donovan fe] t that there should
I
,f .l--:.i'l'Proiect Application
P i r,rrdcr.
-1i\\o i^, Ccr,r...| \luir"ci
t
Date bqLLp-c rr 1qt3
Legat Description' t-ot (c , erock (o , ,,,,nntM
Comments:
'Pil
,l-:. :-i>Ei t t '.'r Design Review Board
Molion by:
,' i) ,,/ ., ,t .. ,i' -l
rU$N
o"," ,ti() tl 1-
DISAPPROVAL
Seconded by:rhs|uac<
,4^/1-.S }tn-rUt yj1g;./\
Su mmary:
D Statt Approval
,r!i.n AND ENVrR.NMENTAL rorr,rr,|
l'l : 30
I :15
2200
0ctober 24, 1983
Site Inspections
Golden Peak Study Session with Town Council
Publ ic Hearing:
Approval of minutes of September 26 and of 0ctober .l0.
Request to rezone the Amoco service station site from Heavy service to Public Accommodation zone district, and to incorporate the site into Specia'l Development District #6. Also, to amend'the Sepciai Oeveiopment District_height section and plan, to increase the gross residential resi_dential floor area allowable, to modify professionil and business offices,
lllglgfl: meeting rooms, convenoion facilities, and commercial parking---'tacilities from conditionai uses_to-permitted uses, to request bn exeiption for parking, to permit additional floor area for commercial uses, and other minor changes. Appl icant: piccidil ty Squaie, ini. -
A.request.for an exterior alteration for the Lodge at vail to add a new wing to the hotel between One Vail place and ffre-t_oJge.-'The proposal includes modifications to the "Lodge plaza" aajicJni"i6 tne rbunbers' plaza
and-to the parking lot on the west side.Appltcants: Lodge at Vail
A request for a conditional use permit in commercial core II in order toconstruct commercial storage uhits in the lower levei ot-ite concert Hall Plaza. Applicant: Eagle Valley Investments, Inc.
A-request for a rezoning. on the Getty 0il site (parcel immediately west of Pitkin creek parkcon-domini_ums in irighorn) rrriin r_ow oeniiiy lruril---
[3TjU 1LP{F) !o special_Development District wiilr-unaerivin-s nrteriat 6usrness uistrict to build a restaurant and',affordable,, Londominiums.Appl icant: Brooks Investments
Request to delete the proposed ice rink/piaza building and accompanying wal ks, stairs, and retaining wal ls for iire Hight uno'pirl iownnomis,- sp6cia1 Development District #ll. Applicant: westeri reaerai Sauings and-Lobn
am
pm
pm
l.
2.
J.
t
5.
6.
7.Request
Nursery
Bus i nes s
quest
el I ing
eovered
for a conditional use permit to ailow a car wash in the voliter
Garage building at l03l South Frontaqe Road in the Arteria.l District. Applicant: David J. Grelg Galles
for a variance to section'l 8..l3.090 8.4 in order to add a secondary on Lot 6, Block 6, Intermountain without having to construct parking. Appl icant: Susan Corrock Husted
m I4
LO t-'.h B t<x :IHE 3 l9s =lri g ItrP o lir I l=[ i
;=.o€To.dP st ctt >l 7E ;'i 3
.,tl
m
=
=FF Xm=
:r --{ \J 4n=
=oo YP t-
!trE
8P CC z=
2=
60 z
trtrtr
o o z
2 F c o {o z T
|1T n 3
{
=o
rD
|D -
q,
(o
(l.)
I
m
z o I m
I
o o !
o -Tt
m !
-{
-{o
@
m x
m .o I
o z (-o
@ I I m
t_-
c
l-
C.
'2
n
=m
'f
z
z --{n
-l
n
z;-lc p<
A=n
r-m
-l
^r
o o z
--{
Z.a -{m uz.>m on -{>
n
T
=m
-{
@ z
=IT
-
ul cl (D o
IJ'
(D o o
o
a
c
c+
{
(D t-
q,
=
cr o 5
o
=cf q,
11
l-z
I t-.t mlo
Ft=
lo ll l>l-
IA
lv,lz lo
I
I
I
I
I
L..l
ls
lz
l-rl l<t>t-
lr
m
F F
I IF
l-
l(D l(+
lcr t-
lc
la
t5 la
I
lQo
I lm tJ
l(D tq
H lo
l€lz
t:l>
I
l4r
19
lE lrn l-o
I
I
E
lz lo
llr t<t>l-lI'lm
lF,lz lo I
lo
l-l-
I
I
ld l€
lz lo
t:t>
lF
IH
lF,lz
lo lt\)
l(Jl l-
l-
_n
=r
=o -
F N Ol
19 F N)Ol
ot
=D <F
D p
rn v,
Y
I
I -l rl
I
I
I
I
tEE
FF
pl @0n
VE fl wf o(t-,x9
-T ('ro EI
+rl|
fl
o
o,
.It
F \ol +o
o
(oO-r
Beg
d P.g 8:8 l=F
=D o '<P{€E6-
=*€(D
=J -.o g)
f *+
o:1 lotJ
*-= 2 i$ o
s a6 ret aRi
E +at gile
! o)!d==
-f +i;6!3
5i=Trfo
-:9 o
= Q'P
odr =s.p J*=9X*5;d ar, -.o-J
oX o
JC.i *=;
e ii=6a5
ER6 o=9 (,o=.
0) -o
€I
:o.
o
to
o
5
=
-J
€:
It
N o
='
o
vt
='to
f
o
o
CL o
2.
J
o
s.o
!"€@(D oD o=E xo:
-o P (ttJ(D @(D o"G)qr'5C
lf
<!o 9r=J.c+J
'o @
a-r,
=-U'=orf
'.rO -9 36 (Dq)
>o za o>
mc
>m
zo m 'tl
Fo
€z
m
o
z -{
_n
'r
=m l-'n
f
0)5 o o
<t
'f o
-{o {
b =
D q
(D
=
(D
o
z g)
T
-t
z
I
z rll
@ (t
I
t-
c
m
+o<_n!
m
F lm >lo rl
I tx
'1,
'n
m
:r
€
t-
@ o ci ri
@ a,
c{ct
u
o-
o
(^
N)
(l)
o
_l
z
t-t m !
_3
--1 o z
m m n
m .o l<'
lz
lz ll t;lr-
m
x
z o
@ l-
-t
z o
J
o c
x x
m€otr
-z z.a
'z f
]*
z>9R 'nX d=
>o o-E8 z c z
(t
f\) |
I ll ll
z m €
t-
m E I
z
=z
r-
m
-{
m
I
|-
x z
c?
O-l 8i Eli
=9 <z oq s 6!< Ets
66 zz
N@=
N--dh;:- @€
oR Oz
=lm eE (Dr
c+H
5()o=
oo tn2 (DO
=n 35
x ct..
il
*l :l -l
v
I (,
(tl (o (tl
o
o
El*l;i iF
Fl*l'i N
Elg I i Nir
l,l1 l,l ls ll
-l o I
l_
m
=
=-n
m m
a.r,
c (n
m
-{
x
m
z
m !
-{
m
9.
z
m
ttl {
@ o
n m o T m
I
z 'tl m m
=m o -
2
.-
t-
=
=
m t-m o
7 o
a-
_q
t-
2 o
m
x
F
2
m
=
=
m n
=
='n
m m
CN
VALUATION
T m 7
={
z o
m
z
t-
!
=g z
6)
m
m
--t
t-
@
z
('r
o
(tr
o
o
o o
o o
s {(.'t
O
o o
o o
o o ;o
o
O o
ro
r\)(tl
N)o
o o
(,(l F o
N)(n tl
*nfi':""ufi#"J,3lioi"r, :
-_utlp-Lc couRTHousE, EAGLE; co.-pn. lsoiti2a.os:c ;:,' ., PERM lT
0-
z l
APPLICANT
PERMIT TO
OATE Susan Corrock #$=-ls tur-esti3 ,"lffil', *o<
(lro,)(STREEr) ., .1.', ). lCOt{TR's LrcENsE)Single Family House (_l STORY
(PROPOSED UsEI
3
TL o
o
dl
d z
c o
(TYPE oF rMpnovEMinrl -lo.
s uao lv rs tor{
autLDtNG ts ro BE _ Ft
TO TYPE USE GROUP
irn rercrr AND sHALL corionu ttr cor{srRucrrol
BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNOATION.
RE MAR KS:
Plan Check $fos.zs
AREA OR uoar"a
=,. ,,,._ _,, , esr,rrorao co", $rcuarffi
35 r 000
o*n.* Sffi Susan Corrock
eoonEss Box 3583. Vail, Colorado 81657
(Affid<rvil qr ievcrre dde of gplicotion lo bc completed by outhorizsd qgrent of ovncr)
!-. Form I OO. t r-77 INSPECTOR
,4.y'*etzy'
I
:E ftte</rlrunt o.in &aJFri$;X'*x€o s'u E?r
x p['. ri"-'
ZIP PHOXE
acn) irc
MAIL ADDI ESs ' 'HOIIE C. Qoce"& x
alcxtlEct ol D as I GraR MAIL ADOIESS I FHOI{E ltcENsE r{o.
MAI L AODiESS PXOT'E
\tr
u3E OF !u t lolN c
I cras of work: Elew - O AoDtiloN E ntrEnnrtot El REpAtR fl MovE 0 REM0VE
9 Describe work: E
l0 Change ol use from
Change of use to
tt Vatuationof work:g 36,OCO PLAN cHEcK reel//.PERMIT FEE
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Si:e ot Bldg.
lTotal) Sq. Ft.
Flr€ SDrinkl€rt
Reouired [y6" flpo APPLICATION ACC€PTEO 8Y.PLANS CHECXE O AY APPFOVEO FOR ISSUANC€ 8Y
OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES:
NOT IC E
SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REOUIREO FOR ELECTRICAL. PLUMB.
ING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONTNG.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL ANO VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC.
TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK tS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED
FOR A PEFIOD OF I2O DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTEF WORK IS
COMN4ENCED.
I HEREBV CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ ANO EXAMINEO THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAM€ TO BE TRUE ANO CORRECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS ANO OROINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WONK WILL BE COMPLIEO WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMTT OOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANV OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULA'ING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
HEALTH OEPT.
FIRE OEPT.
SOI L REPORT
OTHER (Spccilyl
WHEN PF RLY VALIDATED (IAI THIS SPACE} THIS tS YOUR PERMIT
PLAN CHECK VALIDATION cK.M.O. CASH PEBMIT VALIDATION
County of Eagle
ELECTRICAL PF.RMIT
Date of Apptication-..-......-......s-ept-e.fu.er...2-6.,................. ...-.19..7.9.
Ng 1246 Electrical contractor..-.....su.san..dorr akfiack..c-..corrak
Building Valuation
Electrical Valuation
Permit Fee
Inspection Fee
Total Fee
$.............-..............
$ -..88x*t...... _... _...
s...1?. : ? 1...............
$"...........................
$...2s-25
Applicanr......-
S|8orturc
APPROVALS
Plrn Chlcklr
Date Paid....-., .. ...2 /.?.e /7- 9... -
Received By.... ...J-.KeIIe,c.......--..-......... ".
Receipt #4748
BLdg. Permit #1025
THIS FORM IS TO
JOB SITE DURII{G
Datc
BE POSTED ON
cot{sTRucrtoN
{8 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE
REQT,'IRED FOR INSPECTIONS
RECE,VED
OF
CASH
Qgg&&lnrt Fee
{ee&g1on ro.
SQt irion noor,.u,rl
SeIr -Chano"
e!{t;se.l-.gre
!pSc,a/ Use
Yaria")
Qg::_@,ird,(Zon in
/IEM
collectioi
Total Received
;:i;il- E
onty aniE Ns 4148
shart bi cancettto
: : i:1:-.: i r; '-' r'.;.. 1,i'r". :,
Applicant to complete numbered spaces only.
I
,ilar;attacxao !NEEtl
Llaal{sc xo,
ltcri'rrEc Y ot otsrcNEt L IC ENSE I{ O.
ata||EEl
5:
MlrL aooiESS tH LrclNSE r{ o. ;
I
e Co\r.,-
uaE or au rtor fr G .t
8 Ctass of work: qflEW n AoOtTtoIf D ALTERAT|OI{- tr REpAtR .i q,,t.v.i} ; ,;: ,, .i".r\..... . : it,:. rr:::.:--.: ._.-,
l,
RECEPTACLE .. _ . ^_ Outteri . .
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Total LIGHTING Fixtures
FIXTURES APPLICATION ACCEPTED BV.
RANGES CLO. ORYER WTR, HTR.
,NOT ICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAV€ REAO ANO EXAMINEO THIS
APPLICATIoN ANo KNow THE SAME To BE TRUE ANo coRRECT.
ALL pRovrsroNS oF LAws ANci oRotNANcEs GovERN|NG THts
TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIEO WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED
HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT
PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE
PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING
CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
! roNAtuFE o f cor{ iRAc tol
GARBAGE Ot9P. -_. SIA. COOK-TOP
OISH. WASH. CLOTH€S WASH.
SPACE HTR. STA. APPL. !b H.P. MAX.
NO. TRANS.
TEMP. POWER LJPOLE
P€RMIT ISSUING FEE
WHEN PROPERLY V DATED IIN THIS SPACE} THIS IS YOUR PERMIT
PLAN CHECK VALIDATION
6za* fl-.--'a */aas
.-'-<-*lie*$ltlf
cK.PEBMIT VALIDATION M.O. CASH
RECEIVED
sEP 2 6 1978
D€pt. lrt pt"!},,. ,. .
Eagle County. i;otc,.
.,.-t n € l/,1 J O .(./'a 2 t% C<LP-trc->o
Forft IOO-3 1.77
M.O.
INSPECTOR
PLUM
WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACEI THIS IS YOUB PERMIT
cAsH PERMIT VALIDATION cK.
rfio PERMtrappLrcfrpN
cK. M.O.
-- Form lOO.2 1'77
Juridiction of
Appticani to iomplete numbered sPaces onlY.
*w
INSPECTOR
1/ 77
EAGLE couNrY ur,.lo
"Ft NAL: c/o INSPEcTloN,
Review Routing Form ( )
PERMIT APPLICATION
LANDSCAPE INSPECTION FORM
PrimaryRouting ( ) Rerouting
6-t 3-2 {Ar-*"- A-o-lA,
Applicarrt Permit No.Date Referred
Plarrnir rg Commission File No.
Beview and return to the County Buildirrg Official within 6 working days
Planning: Complies with:
Subdivi sion Regul ations
Zoning Regulations
Site Plan (Landscaping)
Commerrts:
Reviewed by:
Recommend Approval :
No
E tr
tr
Yes
,tr a
,xt
Date:
County Engineer:' Roads
Grading
Drainage
Comments:
Recommend Approval :
n I
D
D
D tr n
D
County Health: Water
Sanitation
Perc. test
rxn
HE
ry/tr Recommerrd Approval;
Final Inspection: C/O
Recommend Approval
Comments:
D
Firral Inspection: Landscapi
Recommend Approval
Commerrts:
ng trtr
C,/O lssued
Final Filing Date
by Date