HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL INTERMOUNTAIN BLOCK 9 LOT 6 LEGAL FILE.pdfv
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD vArL, co 81657
97 0-419-2I38
APPLICANT
CONTRACTOR
OWNER
Job Address
Location...Parcel No. ,Project No.
SHAEFFER CONSTRUCTION
P O BOX 373, VAIL CO
SHAEFFER CONSTRUCTION
P O BOX 373, VArL CO
CAHILL DANIEL DOUGLAS
P O BOX 1077, VAIL CO
2855 SNOWBERRY DR
2103-143-01-036
PRJg 6_019 B
81658
81658
& MICHELLE
81658
Phone: 3038455656
Status. . .Applied..Issued...
Expires. .
Description: GARAGE
Fi reptace Information: Restni cted:
000
.00
20.00
.00
'100.00
315 .75
Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT DeDt:II/25/1996 DAN Acrion: AppR Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT DeDt:1,I/25/t996 DAN Action: AppR LAUREN AppROvED Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT Dept:1,I/25/1996 DAN Action3 AppR N/A Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS DeDt:1.I/25/1996 DAN Action: AppR N/A
E7.75 oRB
.00 Recreation Fee---------->
3-00 Ctean-Up D epos i t-------->
TOTAL FEES--___-
345 .75
.00
345 .75
BALANCE DUE----
BUILDING Division
PLANNING Divi-sion rt-25-96 FIRE Division
PUB WORK Division
w@ f9\Wq
\/-h^l' IwW
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTET THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON
PROJECT TITLE: CAHILL GARAGE
ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT
Clean-up Deposit Refund
Additional lees--------->
Totat Permit Fee-------->
> 315.75
JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit #896-0355
I SSUED
rr /25 / tee 6
L7/25/ree6
05 /24 / resl
TOV/CsBnm. Deycssoso
,,0f l,lood/Pa L tet :*********************************************************** FEE SUllllARy *****************************t**********i*****************
Bui Ld i ng-----)
P tan check--->
lnvestigation>
U i L l. Ca l. l,---->
135.00 Restuarant Ptan Review-->.00 Total catcutated Fees--->
Payments
approved
4[U]'SUftLr
Town of VaiI Adjust€lgtpaluarig"i i 08t2O0
flof Gas App I i ances:dof Gas Logs:
***********************t*i********t*******t**********************************t*i**************t****************t*i****************
*********t********t****ff********************#ff*********ff#*******************r*******t***************************rff**********
See Page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this pernit.
DECLARAT]ONS
I hereby acknowtedge that I have read this appl.ication, fiLl.ed out in ful,l, the information requ.i red, compl,eted an accurate ptot ptan, and state that atl the information provided as required is correct. I agree to compl.y with the information and pLot pLan,to compty rrith aLl' ToHn ordinances and state taus, and to buil,d this structure according to the To!,n's zoning and subdivision
codes/ design reviev approved, Uniform BuiLding code and other ordinances of the ToHn 6ppLicabte thereto.
FRo 8:0O A
OR CONTRACTOR FOR HII4SELF AND OI.INER
REOUESTS FOR IIISITEC'IENS .SHALL BE- I{ADE TI,,IENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY
PAGE 2 ********************************************************************************
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL permit #: 896-0355 as of lt/25/96 Status: ISSUED ********************************************************************************
Permit Type: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT
Applicant: SHAEFFER CONSTRUCTION
Job Address: 2855 SNOWBERRY DR
Location
ParceL No: 2103-143-01-036
**************************************************************************!t*****
CONDITIONS ********************************************************************************
1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.2. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED IN AIJIJ BEDROOMS AND EVERY STORY
AS PER SEC.1210 OF THE 1991 UBC.
3. A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER MAYBE REQUIRED TO APPROVE FRAMING
BEFORE TOWN OF VAIL WILL FRAMING.
Applied: Lt/25/Le96 rssued. ll/25/1996
****************************************************************
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Staternnt ****************************************************************
Statemnt Number: REC-0235 Amount| 295,75 II/25/96 13:13
Payment Method: CK Notationl *4789 Init: DS
Permit No:
Parcel No:Site Address:
This Payrnent.
Account Code
01 0000 41331
01 0000 41310
01 0000 41332
01 0000 2zoo2
01 0000 41336
Total Fees:
Tot.al ALL PnTS:
Balance:
Description
DESIGN REVIEW FEES
BUIIJDING PERM]T FEES
PLAN CHECK FEES
CLEANUP DEPOSITS
WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE
B96-035s Type: A-BUTLD ADD/ALT SFR BUILD pE
2103-t 43-01-036
2855 SNOWBERRY DR
295.75
****************************************************************
345 .7 5
345,75
.00
Amount
-30.00
135 . 00
87 .75
100.00
3.00
rlr oz
OE
o2
'o
.,2
do FU
tslr
a@ 20
Ut N
|!{'
dlu at H OA A ao >otl
ra o
oo
I
U H
F
E
.A D
9
FI
tl
U tr
22
&o FIE
F
4
FFt z2
=o EAE
Fi E{AZ ro
F:
FF HZ
oo A=El (
6
FI F
o
X
FI
z
F
lqd :EU
zFt
:lq o (9c Er tra
oo
FI
o
F]
z
F
=>
F{ E rr.{
HO I x& o
PER}IIT #
DArE: lt-1zr ?{
t APPLfCATIoN MUST BE FTLLED OUT CoMPLETELY OR IT UAY NOT BE AccEpTED
x*** * *****t************!t****** PERMIT TNFORI.IATION *i***************************
'\l lf,]-Buildins J 1-Plr'rnbing [ ]-Electrical [ ]-Mechanibal [ ]-other
Legal Description: Lo ztoc,k-L Firirs suBprursroN,lN tt,)t_&_
rft
Architect:Address:Ph.
General Description: fiZ.'4tvt€ 6+rza'bg cu) gls>rtpo- tu*,yvo^)
work class: [ ]-Neh' [ ]-Alteration t{l-Additional [ ]-Repair [ ]-other
Nu:nber of Dwelling Units:Number of Acconmodation Units: ,JA
$r1"" and Type of Fireplaces: Gas Apptiances_^)L_ Gas Logslyfup woodr/pellet-_VL_v ^G************:k******************** vALUATToNs *********************************
'l :yl!?il!g' !^frF-D ELEcrRrcAr"z t_2-ob _ orHER: $pLUr'{BrNc: $ r{EcHANrcAr, $- Toril; $-76b___
r****************'l******+*** C^oI{TRACTOR INFORI,IATION *** ****** * * ************ ****7 Eeneral f6nr'-=n|4.'.. ra,eL1-'($- tr7//#Rf< Town of Vail Recr_ un. Z.f :A-Address: _ '' "'- phone Nunber:
ELectrical Contractor: \ p-,1 ,7r.,^\ l:-ri-,._'1-) / 274'-sZ?*-7
LrrA>a-_. rr,_.,, r ,slort stlgJqtznc .(Jrt]rzr ( Town of Vail Regr. No.Jz/_{:-Address: _\!-L-t_l]:Phone Number: 9qq* S
Plunbing Contractor: ,F^r^,i., ^r rr-i.r r-r^_addressl --------?\'!'
- 3;:1""f.ff11,*"n' No'-
Mechanical Contractor:eaaressi I;:1"'$#:1,*"n. No._
*****************************t**FOR OFFfCE USE ******************************!r
NA
BUILDTNG PERMIT FEE:
PLWBING PERMIT FEE:
I'fECHANTCAL PERMTT FEE:
ELECTRTCAL FEE:
OTHER TYPE OF FEE:
DRB FEE:
BUILDING PIAN CHECK FEE:
PLWBTNG PIAN CHECK }EE:I'IECHANICAL PIAN CHECK FEE:
RECREATTON FEE:
CI.,EAN-UP DEPOSTT:
TOTAL PERMIT FEES:
VALUATION BUILDTNG:
SIGNATURE:
ZONTNG:
SIGNAIT]RE:
CLEAN I'P DEPOSIT REFIITD TO:|5.^,- Ax;,'-) o. Bo* \0?l rJRe , Ca. 7tt(b
TOWNOFVAII-' I
75 S.FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970-479-2138
otrrr*r oF coMMUNr* orurrot*,
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ELECTRICAL PERMIT Permit #: 896-0300
Job Address: 2855 SNOWBERRY DR VAIL Status . . . : FINAL
Location.....: Applied..: 1112511996
Parcel No...: 210314301036 Issued. .: 1112511996
ProjectNo : Expires. .: 1010912001
APPIJICANT SHEARON EIJECTRIC LL/25/I996 phone: 3039495456
POBOX43
AVON CO
8L620
License: l2L-E Also is COIrTRACTOR
OWNER CAHII-,L DAIiIIEI, DOUGI,AS & MICH].1/25/1.996 PhONC:
P O BOX 1077
VAIL CO
81658
I-,icense:
CoNTRACTOR CAHIIJIJ DOUG L1-/L5/L999 Phone:
License:
Desciption: GARAGE
Valuation; $200.00
'i+*****'r**lt'**aal:r+t:t'i,t,t*,i*r*r*,r*****:t'r'*rr+Ni*++:r**rr:r+,rf+++,lr++++,r++ FEIj SUMMAIIY *******r
Electrical------->
DRB Fee----->
Investigation-->
Will Call----->
TOTAL FEES->
$42.00
$0.00
$0. 00
$3.00
94s.00
Total Calaulated Fees->
Additional Fees----->
Total P€rmit Fee--->
Payments----------->
BAIANCE DUE.---->
$4s.00
$0. oo
$45.00
$4s.00
$0.00
Approvals:Item: 05000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT
1112511995 DAlr Action: APPR
IUEM: O55OO FIRE DEPARTMENT
-..-------l1j:-:/-l:-:-.-"-o-T----***.***.*******,l::-::::-i:::***++t+t'i''i+,}+||+|'t1i**t.ll**'t'}*|l},}**:l:t:}:l***t*t+t'i|*|t++'.|+*i|||i*i*
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Cond: CONO003059
:.:.::-:-T--T-:::-::::il::::l-::--:l;.T::--"-:-u:---------+,,,,,+,*..,++++.,***.*,,*,,1*:l,r**1**:l****.,r+,,+,iii,,,,,,+,,,*,,i.,.*,r,,,|*,1*
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,
and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all
Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this shucture according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review
approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances ofthe Town applicable thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM E:00 AM - 5 PM.
* * * * * * *-* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statennt ****************************************************************
Statemnt Number: REC-0235 Amount2 45.00 1I/25/96 I3l.I4
Payment Method: CK Notationt *4789 Init: DS
Permit No: 896-0300 Type: B-ELEC ELECTRICAL PERMIT Parcel No: 2103-143-01-036 Site Address: 2855 SNOWBERRY DR Total Fees: 45.00 This Payment 45.00 Total ALL Pmts: 45.00 Balance: .00 ****************************************************************
Account Code Description Amount 01 OOOO 41313 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 42.00 01 OOOO 41336 W]LL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.OO
Doug Cahill
P.O. Box 1077
Vail, CO 81658
November 8, 1999
Mr. J.R. Mondragon
Town of Vail
Community Dwelopment
Dear Mr. Mondragon:
We currently are working with Electrical Permit #E96-0300 for a garage addition. I am
requesting that Shearon Electric be removed from the permit. Shearon Electric has
completed the power feed connection and I will complete the work and install fixtures for
final inspeotion. The garage is near completion and I will call for the final electrical
inspection in the near future.
Thank you for your time and cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,#N
,/ qb' "
a ',}=^"a (.r.0+r4---
Doug Cahill
ldc
CTION B
*|ew"&'24" aa
tr)lx2il+ttj€D, f@'nlJ(2 qLpnaql-olt{O" ld/6'#,e# W+'tiltfi (z fi7F^r)
Lrew,'w'a1"i'fffro,w iE+{|vH@ o"- rlW?L AND ta'g?*$5lott uxrE8.ttr'.. AFouND ffilqq?3 l"ttI+' +t bPAb. fEttEA'm
wJ___f'-L -
e2tAO @?rt\*l
;
**wvn* e 2["o,.
t..W 1** @. lA'aL
*f,pvet- e 21" o,e-ffr l-9"
2-*5*?2 afi'
YO? A;sto wrfoH
4-F ?*74 Ar{r,
l4lPaEIL
PP*s.t @,' *Et^t )-l$l
+4 wues a V! o.c-' l*ot
Le'lt
wd;prye",vt=o,
*[ * a l]ne,c
+5A\F,O lbt e'c.
?--F 9L?9 co$a.-lo? *NP tcrl-IbH r
qvb fta. Fu+l
o o o F.
F o t ('t
o rF
b+5 €*3 ortt.' Yo? ,tre A'TIor1
L-tG GlPt @t+1.
I .-,r +'4 ftR[,eferR-I eFrH ule\EL .ffi,ft:'o*
o
d c t-^
d (,
L o
o 3
E
F
gl
I
o o
G
9 o
()
j
s
Ha
fi5 j6
= trO J- LO
6R
SECTION A SECTION C,
I'f,A1H r rpr
o o o o
o o o o
d
.E
d (,
L o
=o
E .F
g
J
Hs
XE
s9
xr,*Sh
EdzE
Pf"v
.L,
STORAGE LEVEL FRAMING w
o o'g)
F
F o 3 g
3
(o
F
S2 oF'2
a!!Fr!rrl. aPagltlclalds
f, lo||tdrtlot| itaatgn D$ad spon tr.urad aotl balrlng ca9ldlty cl tooo Fl rtd aqstv.L||t llutda Daaaaur. o! al IEI to Da naltl..l blr .oll. .nfh.tr .t ttra cl arorvrtlo. auhlt oolt cl a.F!C 3a .nglnaal,fl IU toubaatto ,.Ur alotrrt t,.rbat ! ct 9.ra9a aldl lart dnlnr at. lroaC Drotcclon.t) llt ooooaata llrt.ttrln rlrrli|r caDr.rrttr .tr.rEtb ot ,ooo
Fl .lt r 2r ary.. DarlgD baa.O r{ED llllDllo @Da IIIPIXI-Ert !* IllfldclD @rctlal (rcl rlrl, lttr.at LLfc.cl||t -t.l l. Gda a0 to! aa.dr f5 bati., 16 b.rr ala |rrrt r .r. Oa.d. 60. Ltntorcl|B plro.rtrt .Datl 6to'r rtt! tlltlt ot lArmlnD tnrcllcr, ltra .. D!.D.rtd rt calr.' tl lll \!rD.f .!dl h Do|rN-rl' ll cr t tt r, .*o.Irg rolr.nl|.d lut r t blch la ld-tlr lr or htt !,at ul elrlq b..D rb.lf !. DougF r (tb-zaoo Ft).7l a!r{.tqr.l at al .bru ba l3a, aiolo8 lclt .Dd lcrtr abdl L 1307,t) nn,. ar{ |lcccLr rs,. .r rtn|tiot|rtrd !y tEg-JorSt
^ oolroNtlllfl, r.. |bolr 6rardtrgt. ^U
DulIt-rD ll.tol|!-DaaD
-|.r
D. llr.d vl,th DL00 .Dd Ddtd rtti I t:otr cl tlffr.
.f;i J"ffl,'E ?ff .Fii.ll#'i.iH'. ?.-i! -loltoD,
,) 8h..th ll,oora rltl l,/a. DltYood ot drdrt al .t.!lta lro.lil rlth rlnlrur .D.! Erthrg ot a0l20 or !.tt r al|n tlu. tltb
. PLoo. I.tf Dfrroo4 ett! lod I a' e ErL.. ot!.ttl...Foltl.d. oov.r d.cL yltl 2rt t (lo.. utt! 2 .cr.rr t !b.|rlttg Doltlt.lol ihrti rool. vlth 1,4. frltdood o! cltaot C rtl.ld bo.ra eltl dnlDr .f[t a.ttnt cl trl16 or b.tt r .!d 9l||. elth Prioo,trU DIIIE d rlcl |(I | 6. rt Datr.l dgaa ard 12r 6q et 'ht t radlrt aturt .u) aD.rcl rll .rt rlor hll. elth l./r. Dlt,ood or orl.ntad .!r.D.l bo.ra Ylt! rtnhr..D.r r.Llig ol lalo oE D.tt ! .nl
. glrE vlth DLoo. LII elth lort l.a. e rt D|I|.! .tlg.. ard llr ca at lnt ardlato rtrdr.rZ) Ll,v| ro..!a r|a.l lor d!|lln--rFl-lo F aDcr.
-tlooa-ao Ft liaatdaDltal., {Da-:t F .
-t tCxuata-loaa f UIC Itl [l oon tErEttoB co ooT)lyrylur tL l9la unllqrr luudlrg
. ccdt (g!ct .. ldopt l !4 tL $06 _ol lt tr h|rldnlg Dq||rt-rnt .$a tla .c.6.!r1 Cdrrutlo a cl tlia CoDtarct lct I (b[.ta{otlcn. (IIA Doq[rt f:Olr.
' ral qnacruat, nl| a. tollar--&.dor-tL f 16. oa. .Io.!t Fcl-ooti .. Dcill.
ROOF FRAMING
t6)
r?)
lr)
lt,
fll b.E, Jcl.t .!d t.tt r. .hrU !..t lrys nIL oE b..r e D. hunt rltt llp.cn 8ttong{L bsEDEr o! rDDEot td .{urlr. tll ooirtr.stts b.Eih.|t u l]Nt.cbrql by llry.c ,trg!t- a or qDfottral aqtr.L.lll atsrEt{ral rrD.r. ala aLrb ln thalr llnal fDatttoo,dEtrt cd.tfiEtlar lt t y ba rE|.gr!l| t! atca tortt$.oa t!. atlratur. rltl- otb.r Frta .r. D.lta ao.t.rrEt d.
coDt ct tb. rttrEtr|r.l .trgh.|r loa coo.ultrtloD .. r.$drrd.
cootErstor L naDoDrtbL lor rll DoD-qrclll.d cquaotlon ,cont ct atrscbrral attgln.r lcr d.trll. |t raqdtrd.colta.qtcr la to occr{tlata rll Clafrhaag! I,.t|.tratlota (1...,cbln tt|, Dlqlbfurg aaraF, .tc., tbrorr$ rioolr, tlor. .,i.!lollraacton_Ell. vl,ll! aDtalDclata auD-ooDtnctoL. -qdn!!l ooatraotor l. a.aFraIDL tor Danr, -thoda, taclDl$r.,
aaquanoaa aod 9rocaaluEra r..4ldid rftn tft[3 tt!t.at.lll r.t rl.l!flE ..l to .rt rlol amlor tsl.lu.t. otraltlq!to D. tr..t- t!.ra cor lltlq! (1.a. oblcrf tr.rl-at,.c.iDrrg, {!ig, .tc.t .r F$drrd !y ccd..
!r)
| | wla:tol
lbr o,c,
lrJ .O#o
#E?
=mtr 1=q e96
46()di rln_l l!r/-
3Hs
o o o o
l--l g€
o o
J
0F23-2002 lnsn€stion Reouest Reoortlna
Z;.-oj-ery'. .- ' yAlt-,.co.:to!afl{ bf -
S&jde@eu
Req'Jested Inspect Oate.
inspecHon A'ea:
5l&'Address:
BgS0355 Typa a.-Bl-rlLD
O,:{:u}4rlfv:
SHA€FFER Ci]NSTRITTft)N,i .
$HAf;FFEF L:CNS rF{-.rcl ror!
CAHILL I]AT{IEL T,()UGL"}.$ S MICI.IELLE
AAFNOE
I?ursday,
May !3,2002
2855 SNSTVBERRY DR VAIL
..jub Tyrr€: ASFR
U€a: VN
Phon€: i{J384{i5556 Pi1ons 3038465656
Feqsested Tlme:
Phsne:
Entct€d Br:
Acitr.-rr): AP,. hl APFROVED/CORRECnON
TE OFOCCUF
AhDLEFT HIM SSA€E TO
THE APPLICIATK]TI
OFT}€
AchvW:
Crxret Typ*r:
Applicard;
Contracto|
fiffier:
Descrlptlor:
Sbtlls: ISSLIED
Insp Area' C F
Rcguaste4 hrscsc[qqis ]
Item: 90 Bl--DG+inal
Requastor: S||AEFFER CON$TRUC flON
Comments: GARAGE FlilAL 131-.145:
A8shnod To. CoAVIS - Action: Tlnl€ Erp:
hrne!:tion HlJEry
ItBm: 51O drfuaiYrv orade finrl
Itern: 10 BL06^FmlinnJSteel irm. ?0 BLDG-FounJAtlorVSt€6|llr$: 52O FLAI,I-ILC Slt€ Plarr
ften: 30 BLDG"Frsmrno tl r0l/Yi -lmDestor:
comm€nE: sod note
0{:00 Pfii n s7c64+s6T
l
oFLORES h\ I
^rd
[u'^ra
p /^f*\P*ry*brfi- fffi.u
|'nill!g9
'!:tmrn€nts:
finl/s{,
Comnrenlt:
90 BLDG+1Nd
lntg€ctct. ART A.:tion: dJ CEi?T
ADbrL fOrrME " COrilriACl'.OR N.*)t ON SriL CAi
C,ALI. ME .I.IO RESF,QI.ISE SO*iE S]'I.'CCQ ITAS BEEN
APPEARS TO COMPT Y WIT}I CODE. UNCLFAR AS TO WTIAT TII€
lb'n:
II.ISPECfiSN VVERE TO 8E
In3pic{or: CD A.riion: *Pe6$PPq1,6P
p€r conv€r. wilh rrt
/ -/-,/ A. .na-t tH
T
FGPTl:{1 Run fd; 1599
4l olgn Review Action Ftr
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number Date
\I
Project Name:
Building Name:
Project Description:
ArchitecvContact, Address and Phone:
I r) | t- ,).
LegalDescription: Lot i/ Block "\ Suouivision \!\tCt'ri!/\Ltu\t4-r r,v Zone District l-'-.,
Project Street Address:
Comments: ,]
Motion by:
--3oarC./@D
Vote:
Seconded by:
D Approval
! Disapproval
)rstaff Rpprovat
Conditions:
Town Planner
.LY r- n d.rr I
DRB Fee pre_oaid .ipLrL/ , v U;r_{ .
F
t.rl..d, a/L7191
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPI,ICATION . TOWN OF VAII.,,,;COIJORADO gcl ? I 193i
DATE RECETVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:IilE?|
I.
A.
**********
TNCOMPI'ETE APPLICATIONS TTAY NOT BE SCHEDUTJED FOR REVIEW.
**tl*******
PROJECT INFOR}IATION:
DESCRIPTfON: -1-rr t r:> Arf+i ,- - :-i:r ,- Dr'J
,r-r-'.- ,^'l--=l: . ,, ,. ,.
EI TYPE OF REVIEW:
,-New Cons Lruc tion r,/ Addirion (950.00)
($200.00) Minor Alteration ($20.00)
($0)Conceptual Review
c.
D.
ADDRESS:1,., - l\J e-t\
/
I,EGAL DESCRIPTTON: LoL C
Subdivision 'l.:t.l ,, ," r . - /. \
Block (:l
If property is described by descripci.on, please prowide
to this application.
ZONING:
NAME OF
Mailing
-P l-s
a meets and bounds
on a separat.e sheeL
1ega1
and at,t.ach
F.APPLICANT;Address: 'Phone L
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATM :'>:) t' ){-
H.
T
.7.
NAME OF
Mailing Address:
Phone
OWNER(S, SIGNATURE: \,
Mailing Address : ,', )
Phone
APPrJrcATroNs wrrJrJ Nor BE PRocEssED wrtHoUT owNER'.9 srct\rAruRB
Condominium Approwal if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid aL Lhe t,ime of submiE.E.al of Lhe DRB application. rJater, when applying for a building permiL, please ident.ify the accurace valuation of the proposal . The Town of Vail will adjust the fee according Lo the t,able be1ow, t.o ensure the correct fee is paid.
VALUATION $ 0 $ 10,000
$ 10, 001 $ s0, 000 $ 50, 00L - $ 150, 000
$150, 001 $ 500, 000
$500, 001 - 91, 000, 000 $ Over 91,000,000
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAIJ EXPTRES
APPROVAL IJNLESS A BUILDING PER!{IT IS IS STARTED.
FETET
$ 20.00
$ s0.00
$r.00.00
$200.00
$400.00
$s00. 0o
ONE YEAR AFTER FINAI,
ISSUED AI{D CONSTRUCTION
5a
17
rI. PRE.APPI,IICATION MEETING:
A pre-appl-icaE.ion meet.ing with a member of Lhe planning staff is encouraged Lo det.ermine if any additional applicat,ion information is needed. rt is the applicant's responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to determine if there are additional submittal requirements.Please note that a COMPLETE applicalion will st.reamline the review process for your project.
III. IMPORTAIf,T NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THB DRB:
A. In addition to meet.ing submitt,al requirements, Lhe applicant mus! stake and tape the projecL sit,e t,o indicate property 1ines, building lines and building corners. A11 trees to be removed must be taped. AII site tapings and staking must be completed prior to the
DRB site visit. The applicant must ensure that staking
done during the winLer is noE buried by snow.
B. The review process for NEW BUTLDINGS normally requires two separaEe meeLings of the Design Review Board: a conceptual rewiew and a final rewiew.
C. AppLicanLs who fail to appear before Uhe Design Review
Board on Eheir scheduled meet,ing daEe and who have not
asked in advance that discussion on their item be postponed, wil-l have bheir items removed from the DRB
aqenda until such Eime as the it,en has been republished.
D. The following items may, at the d.iscretion of tshe
zoning administrator, be approved by the Community
Development.Department, staff (i.e. a formal hearingr before the DRB may not be required):
. a. windows, skylights and similar exLerior ctranges which do not alter the existing plane of Lhe building; and
b. Building additions not visible from any oEher lot or public space. At the t"ime such a proposal- is
submitE,ed, applicanLs must include l-eet,ers from - adjacent properEy ordners and,/or from the agent for or manager of any adjacent condominium association staEing Ehe association approves of the addition.
E. rf a property is located i.n a mapped hazard area (i.e,
snow avalanche, rockfall, flood plain, debris f1ow,
weL1and, et,c.), a hazard sEudy musE be submitted and the owner must sign an affidaviE, recogrnizing the hazard
reporE prior Eo the issuance of a build.ing permiL.
ApplicanEs are encouraged to check with a Town planner
prior to DRB appLicat,ion to d.etermine Ehe relationship of the property to all mapped hazards.
F. For all residential construction:
a. Clearly indicate on the floor plans the inside face of Lhe exterior structural wa1ls of the building; and
b. IndicaLe vriLh a dashed line on the site plan a four foot distance from Lhe exterior face of the building wal.ls or support.ing columns.
G. If DRB approves Che applicaLion with condit.ions or modificaE,ions, all conditions of approval must be
addressed prior to the application for a buiLdinq permit.
l r.. .'
IJTST OF IIATERIALS
r-,or li I
{ P..t
A.SUil,DTNG MATERIAI.TS:
Roof
Siding
\
OEher walI Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walls
Exterior lJiqhting
Other
TYPE OF MATERI,AI.,COLOR
\^
o (\
'l
\1 Y
D
t"
l\
t>'\$
r-\
h
I
\'\=
v
s n
\,,
)
Designer:
Phone:
,- /7
NA},!E OF PF(OJIICT. ( {)A\LI (A\E/J Af,
IJEGAIJ DESCRIPTION:
STREET ADDRESS:
The following information is
Review Board before a final
SUBDIVISION
Dt'r rst:-
7LfiEnY>u,'il,ltx\
required for submittal Lo the oesign
approval can be given:
{n eT}Ar \----. 6fze,t\
b" LAP Jr nruru na,^o sli,.e (),
Cotlk"t-- l}nc 6trx')
r , ,',. ;tl fl6 t4
1..-/v?r{)'
r .\ / t \ -.I rqL-r ,l AH-7 - I l"r4LL Lr 6l-h
AJ Y\-
NA
^J^
B.LANDSCAPTNG: Name of _rvr,4-_
o
Conunon Name
- ''r l
Ouantitv. Si.ze't PLANT MATERTAI,S:
PROPOSED TREES
AND SHRUBS
Botanical Name
c.
*Indicate caliper for deciduous t,rees. Minimum calioer
for deciduous trees is 2 inches._ Indicate heighL for
conr-!erous trees, Minimum heigrht for coniferous trees is 6 feet.**IndicaEe size of proposed shrubs 5 gal-lon.
Minimum size of shrubs is
TvDe Square Footaoe
GROT'ND CO\/ERS
soD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: ff exEerior lighting is proposed, please
show the number of fixtures and locations on a separate
lighting p1an. rdentify each fixture from Ehe lighting plan
in the space below and provide the heiqht above grade, tlpe of
liqht.proposed, lumen output, lurninous area and a cut sheeE of
the Light fixture. (Section 18.54.050,J)
OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATITRES (retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) Please specify. Indicate heights of retaining wal1s. Maximum height of walls within che front setback is
3 r , Maximum heiqht of waI1s elsewhere on the propertsy is 6'
D.
6sE
rrryffi':
uaszs j+,w 9ZOJ'
LOT 4
LIN€ a€ARINC DETAilC€
Lt N7670'4r'W 24.50
\n
l8
$DELTA RADIUS ARC TANGENT CHORO CH EEARINo
ct 2t7s'5J' t47.OO 54.s6 2260 54.24 NE64838'W
c2 t32J'47' t25.OO 29.23 14.6E 29.'6 N625235-ty
LOT 7
scALE t" -- 2O'
LOT 2 H (Jt H
$
I hercby certify thot this improvemen t locotion cqtificata vos prepored for
the Mortgoge Lender ond the Title Jnsuronce Cotnpony, thot it is not o lond survey
plot t improvatnen t survey plot, ond thol it is not to be relied upon for the
esloblishment of fence, buildhg, or other fu(ure improvement lines.I further certify thot the rTnprovements on the obove described parcel on
this dote October 15 1996 excep t utiity connections, ore an thely uithh
the boundories of the porcel, cxcept os shovn, lhot there ore no cncroochments
upon the described premises by improvements on ony odjoining premises, cxcept
os thdicoted, ond thot there is no opporen t eidence or sign of ony eosement
crossi4g or burdcnhg ony port of sotd pdrcel, except os noled.
fhis certilicotc docs not constitute o title scorch by lntcr-Ilountah Engmeering
to determine ornershtp or eosements of record. For oll informotion regording eose-
ments, rights-of-roy or title of record, lnler- Houn toin ralied upon the Finol
Plat of Voil lntermountoh 0eve/opmen t Subdiision.
LEGEND.'
cccco - DEt'IOfEs RaCK WALL
: - DETYOTES 6' x 6' T|IIEER
\
J..)''1:l l rr; ;rr,
NO\|CE: Accordrhg to Colorodo low )ou must commence
ony legol oction bosed upon ony defect h lhis survey
rithin lhree S,eors ofter lau llrst discovs such defect.
*9.i:ti,*L C2 ta
ln no event, moy ony oc trbn bosed upon ony defect h
this survey be commenccd morc thon ten yeors from
the dote of certifrcotion shovn hereon.
LI
SNO'YBERRY DR|W '50'CI AOORESS: 28sS SNOWERRY DR|W
LOT 6
a4t A&ES
i,f
t3 I
z.
i6 tm
/s ,6
/,;
s/
/s
\r\t\ln-
I
cH=t44'
SPHALT DHVTWAY
---..\\
o 'fiWhrg fiInter'tountain ..^!:s, PH,?I
iffi 3ft9;;!* "--tgt ".-t grn *yi$'io%li
IMPROVEMEN T LOCA NON CERNFICA 7E
LOT 6, ELOCK 9
VAIL NTERMOUNTA.N DEWLOPMENT SUB.
\OWV OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY COLORADO
o$@ e': o.o.F.
9ttEf t 2. I OF I
v
o
Doug & Michelle Cahill
Garage addition application
Design and Review Board
Town of Vail
DearDRB;
We are submitting an application to the DRB to complete a garage structgre on our
property at 2855 Snowberry Drive. There is presently a foundation in place for tlis
structure which was completed during the original construction of our residence.
At this time we would like to complete the project and construct the gange using the
same color and materials to match the existing home.
Ifyou have any questions concerning this application please give us a call.
Sincerely:
Doug Cahill
Home 476-9599 Work 845-5656
Single Famj.ly
ZONE CHECK
' FOR
Residence, Duplex,
ZONE DISTRICTS
I
Primary/ SecondarY
DATE:
T,EGAL DESCRTPTTON: LoL d/) stock 1 s'-traivision ly'tar'l"o^tt*a'
ADDRESS:
OWNER
PI{ONE ARCI-IITBCT
ZONE DiSTRICT
7T5a ao a5D
-Y-.---4 qllu
Atlowed
(30) (33)
BUILDABI,E
Exi s tinq
LO? AREA
ProPosgl Total
z t' {u M)r^qp lf,-/neishs
y'roual cRra
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
y'seb.backs
+ 425
5l1b 25+q zu=763q
3'/6'
+425=
20'
1.5',
L5'
_ -6r__\r'siue coveraoe( 15'b )3A4- lt4o 564 \a&
/ t andscaping (r7olo
y'R.b.ining warr IleighLs
OY"-
,/part<ioq 3 neqrd -Z Z-encl
/ .l----\/ coros" CrediL (300((600) le00) (1200) azb
/ Drive: ZXi+ht"L PermiLLed srope % Proposed slope %
FronL
Sides
Rear
/ complies wj.t.h T.O.v. r,ighuing ordinance Yes X - No
,/wauer coursc sef-bacl( (30) (50, ltl'O
"/ Da Finish Grades Exceed 2:1 (50%) ' YES- NOj--
y' Environment al/Hazards : 1) Flood P1ain n'O -
zl FercenL slope \< > 30r..6, ? 44olD
3 ) Geologic llazards ' a) Snow Avalanche l\'O
b) Rockfall
c) Debris FIow t^,o
4) wetlands K.rO
/view Corridor Encroachment: Yes---No, lA,D
/no." t-his requesL invoive .r 2i0.r.rd<iiiiorr? =W,,llow much of Lhe allowed 250 Addi;io., i" useETIT6-Tfris requesE?-O
/ pre.riorrs condiLions of approval (check properey file):
10
', 1 f
i_
d athaf tCad .rt vrl lrart a rli.lda.rfldr fo fhr r.ld p.rrf..)l tha. tr..t p..t In trfr, palC b/ aha ,ald A,,r'|ll,n ol tha t'c(I! p"l, lh' ?actlpt ,ttrrol lt htr&y cqltrra.d a.yi r;tn .iodgrd, hr 9ryr113. ba.t.l.rc, |{tt l|t cgwlfrd, rrd !'tlt9aa p.ror6r. dc"r |..nt. t.rC.ln, r.ll, convry a d ic.lflri ulto tha.ttd pfti.a o, lha aa.o.id Da.t. t,t.lr hal.r r.rd )rtetr tor.r.r. not lr ?..*v I.a eq|dni hll Ih lotat rl.,rr[r . rtr fctioring ci"cifi.i-iif . or lrectt .l tar,ttlt ..{ b'i^c l^ rh. ttlt'tt co.ntv ii ' a},bi.H - }\d rrlrr or color.do, ro rrrr
$ffiH:8$,t#t, mHil ffiW ffiHn'fi , of$fllf'q"t'€,mr
FITARS lllD oo/,r0o,s__--_00ttart,
.tro ulr.. rtrt r |rrr? 2855 &lq{BEnRy IAHE, tr'a:L, @LORAD()
l$tllll rlth rtt ||d alitvl.. ihr ht'rattnnir ard npfr.rr t..{^(fr thafrto balt'llirn, or In ryrrla..pFftrtnt^|, a.i ff1.:i:,1l;g.yl,.i=ty,-11-,=1t1, :f!i, r,,,-i'.w proriti tiriroii i.v ,ri iii'..,.r., ,lr,ir, rrr.n:Jff:.:i:,1ggyt,igy:,":-;i,y-::i ::"1i1 ji.il-;v;;;i,;i;;;Y; L'l,i'fi1':.ffi':iiI tntorui,- ci'tti ;-;;;r;';.;; rr' rlnr'r rtrrrr 'ry Prorrtl lnt'rol; r'{ r(l lhr .rl.lr, tilhl
bv, b.rd, |,rd D_{r_ !rrr ,:vg-:j,:r! l:lC -F.tf ot ,t^r rtrrr Frra, rith.r tn rrc ir q,/iii,or, rn }a, to rhr .".r.!.:il"f^trl r.., rlri rhr h..r"Jti;ar-.4 ;;r;,.;";.L$!|I llfl.n::*d-I::I':-:::: T.1.fll ;E;iirturr, rilr rh. .efi,r,r{L.r, u,ro rn. r.,5 Dr.!,e. or * 3fl.?iii;.l.Ll.l3j1,;:l:: i:::::::li.i;;-.;i;;;;;';-in;,;t,:i.,f i;-fr::1,i,';,:T.iil:li::J::.::* 1.ii::':ff:.1,1::pil''..:,il:-lig.lLT..ei..-to -.,rr irii ;;; ;;l;'#li:.';i l;ll;d';J::'i;.ii'ilill #lr:: :).:J ,::,:ra:1-if 3i1tj,i-"y-J.i..i ,ti iii.i'ii"i.i,ll ;.il';i,"l.i;lT1l.?ii,lll'L^lll ffti._lli* illi:,T,lLjl.I:,:,..^lr.1Al:-iui. i,i,i.-oi-iJii,ll.,ii,.ii'riJ,.; ;;.li*:l;':[ ff?_ll1,;:i:!tr: .- i"i,ir"l,iii;itili i,U;r=liil;:i; il':il:,'frI'li3i; l[:,* l},.lfii;if,li.#*.,j::J::.t.1l::.f ,1.:: l::-:,1-!"1:,; ..d-o,f,i,-ei-ii ;;;:i;;'.;il,"i,;:1.fi,':::.::.*il'::l
f! tha. tor- b.r9a l ^.d p.rlrar in thl ,Jlrt |.d paa!r&{a Oo|trrrtcr rnr, .r,!r? arrt9rt rrt tha h.lra rnd .trli.la ol rlEh tvrvlvor, rgrl.rt of lo.ctri. th.60lr o? rry/ F.rt rhr..ot,-rhr rrto liiy oi-iir-iirlt arrwJt.? d,rrta. r6rtt |rrllda lha tl|'tl, the itvral 1ir tirletrl, .,s ,taa.t,
-._-ll Vlll(ll t ttllor. thf rrtd ra.ty of 3lx ftrrr D.it hra h.rrenro r?| I4..
P,O. mx 1077, vA:L, 03 816tS
. Carity cl a.rl ttrta ot Cot e.ddo,thr rrld trfly ot lha llrri trarl, tof nd In asxlCr.rrl;
. i l". rlv pt..rtr'
THIS DEED . r{d. rhi.
lr: |!nh
XUML-TH W. I,{,\TIHUdI;
Ma), ]fr, 1989
cl I lrr Co(,lry sl trt ttrta ot
Eolatri'o. ot rha ti..r
'.ra, ul
IIA}EEL EJCIAS CA}TIII ard HIctiEIJT .I.'NDI{I]Au ()\}|ITIJ
i,a fra
m6
I !u TO r r- lJ r. I tr0,ou
tf|bo o0r
mo
o@ tru a
<n)
ou
m
*
*)or l ara I rddrht tt
cl tlrl
tt lf tlttl I thrt
T}JET'IV IIS.'STND
I
3,
prr t t '
oo
tt thr raco.t al tir .|r c,
-r
i r.n
a
x
q
IJ r!
EM or)
ffiffi ,Hffi Hi#sns"m,ml'*ffi ilrma'Fnw,h,f B,
f\)
88
fi tr
ot aald pa.tlar of tl|. rco6d i[.t, tht lr.vlyo. ot
_!ll ?tJ.:"!.I r:.!o.t 9! F.rar rd{urty ct.trr^,p..t a.r,a r.rC rtll gtttAtt ln tonivtt D:fart, lia
f M ero oa iV f.{t rirl I lt rtpl irrbt I lo .l I
rit't f ?c.4
t,tfi qt*brriv'rr In rh. rr...rt or | 4 *oric,a I_
,'i'
'4,,
" ,,. ., i -;i?-oi-ea;a;6C--'- i cqa'rot'i*t.L!^' | -*-
aboYr
(lIl!)
(tlrt )
Glr( t t) I
lha tOr.gOi|I lnlrtl,rt |.a aatn*l dtad brf Ora I thlr dry Ot
ur xEfisll| W, lilmEns
lf cc-laalcr a'{tl r.a
l,lay 26, 1989
t, 'lt o ,t9 1'1 ,trtrwtt ry n^,1d |{a oltt.r.t .a.1,tr- tt'-?)1ia-t I
' t t' "/
_ tt4 i4:-t_dz__+ _ /(r t !,._4_.:,../ tol rf y 9vDl tC
;a.i 9?lA CCfiPUtt{ rltt^rty trc.a, 13402V
0t €O,t c Jotni lrr'^.,r\litls, 11102
t
\
=-N \'*\N
\\s
f-..--
\
\
S\.
\(\
\$
e fv l-t
frlr at0 F{l
arlf l'l gt
fr+f\l
fq E .{t
A r-,'\E'
r-l
r-1
-H r1 g
F d Fr l>\-
el tl a-f-r?a+
-A E9 F{l
E A
-0 Fr
H
F
-f
-f l-'v
a-f F d
rEl
E .g
'f.?g tf
t+'
H H
.9 ts d H
-<ol *;;**=-l-H:;O 3;=x
^oZ.l v-o!
:trl ;9\;
XA-:-
<- l-t: --l b
-b a-€clR
lt:r- '..1 , ;\J ....: -'.t \-g-*=U
,i^>YQZ <-c-{Z;--.
=3c X>*r tszI =on:!rfi z =o
*?F .-!Cn -t>
;- \- ln YQ2 z:l o:q
r'\ Cr': u x-n zi={*s
=Zc -,^.2
.i \./ ,i'a\>\J
5-S<>iut zzc
- lS -:t
-iA Hro
--l \,
z
=
c)D
F c-
r!}
H
14 z
rr,
C
o
2.
=
=.
l-IH tz
F
l-
l>IB IH lF{
i*IF
lF,lm H
]Y
12
I'
a
o
!
I
IF ll
l-
=
z
s.
(,
J
a
JE
F z
3 H el
rl r
r -
o-
l
t.)
a z
{
|<
H
P r
@
o\lJl
!
c.
\o \o vr
+2=7.i_7 ' i: l:-':.i - i. !='--=1i??
=:=i-:a - f,
=;7
-
i +: z l
=-=1i;-,a 1, F C-i
)_?-{ ? = =
= t - - -a
a : ; i 3-=- .'=? I =
= =4 ^ ='
:_==a:=J
a !:!= -
: e ! a-:-:
i i:-. : !: =::::;'^ i =r;.1.= =. I ^
14 F :: ;
=. a = ;. a =.
=Irz,^'.at)4\
\-)/
o o z
cn {7 c ()
{6 2 T
-lm ..l n 3l=Hl=
o m l*r-,h 8 lde i lm: -19s ?l:* g
lpfi I l< -{ I l=i :I3
o.<1o.d8 a 'l!E€>l fi9 I !m t
-{
lFlI TR x9<t<
Ff;E FYo 1t=
FP"r
f9 -tl !@ Or u i=ra O@ 1Z=; =o -v Hz
p.
trnE
2 o -{m
I ft'o !
o .n
1t m !
-.{
-{o
@ m x m !-{
o z
L o E o
-{m
c'
m
@
,ri
z co
-1 H
F\.r,
-F ,r.\ o
-ll Ir
V'r-t,ti t'l
I
o
2p -{c
8E at 7
f m
i v o
r
c)2"im az >m on i>or-F
g o
@ z
IT
c)
H
Ei r
a H
z
€
H z
F]
E
z H
z
z
=m
e1
t
tri r.rtl
c)P
H r r
x
N
\J
a -{
P
l.
!F
o\
I (,
!
*lg
lo
E
l6
I
I
E
lz lo
l1l t<t>
lF t,lm
le,lz
l9
.l
{z
o TI
2 -
m o
z o
-l o
=z
o tt
r
!m
9'z o
I !
=
(A F
c)
z (n
H z
E
l6
F
til
l6
li
I
s'
I
or
=F :E
>l
BIF t-Eln
lc'r t! to
xlz la Nto olz @l
co lP IF lc)
IEE l'
I
I
o
-t
tri
!I
I
5
;FiigIF
[IFEEii
IirciEE
l[Eiiii
z o
t-
i
o z
I
x z m
an a
T
t--
m
f,o<lnP
a lm 9 tf;tto
Els
:t.*l*
n
m
{
|-f-
'n
o
F FI Fi
l.,)N)
\o
l o z -
m
=-l (tt
z m m
m
l<'
12
lz
t-t It lf-
I vr,t;
l=
l-
F l
m
I -l
z 'n J
z
l t
!r
o m o
t-
=m
=z
c z .i
9t
l-
o o
I
z c z f
ct,
I
z m €F
'<x
|-{m !
-{6 2
o 9
=o z
|-
n m T
!
{
!m
o 7
.ll
f-
x 2
t AE B;Ei FE Efi Ag Ei" a1
^6= S b Yz9 -'ooo
ea22 #-
=9 ral
FI Ii=
;ll N m
=F:l (r) r
'ql 5 - <
>l v<El =
EI
I (,
1
N)
._.1
\o
!
z z
1O ,FF 9o
F,o tz FlO
rlld r=)a
z
|l
tt
z z
0
=z 6 ,
o u
m
=-I z -o ffo in !.! n F-
'sE
l-
z
c)H
"*g {
@
(-.
tlt
z
rl
H
c)H
o\
\o
-t o
|-
ro
m t
=i 'n m m
an
c o m
-.1
x
o -m
2
c
g
m
3 .2,{
m 2 o z !m s tn {
@
u 0
,m o 5 m
^z -tl
m m
3 m o
z
(1
|-
|.
3 E z o
tn |-m o -l u o
-
!-2 o I m o x
F 0 z o
!m
-
!m n
=-{'Tl
m m U'
VALUATION
!m a
=-{
-I
F.l
H b
3 m o -
2 6
-
!t-c 3
E z o
m -m o
7 o
t_q
z o
L'
._J
i..)
5 L/'
s oo \o 5 (Jl F @
5 5
NJ
@ gl
qs\s $qs$
rii
l.
I
I - \r l- l/,'\ i'r /
\\'
{\
$l
i
ll z
'['-I
'(\
N L
)\
?
ni
'(.y, l
rl-'
!L---r-
\\:,
i t-'- c)
-it.
I
\l
ii (
+-
=I z
m
m r
-tt r
v
f\*
l'
ri
i!
1l
\
T i-
r
E:E
N o
{o
€z
o
Tl
h
i-o
I
il
6'- 6t
,\;l \I'l I.r \i (,' 't
IJ,$li \r \$ $r| -l sr I ri
$ lo\$ li $ {r'$ ti
(\x X{
$ +rl
N nt\ti $$$ rF ) $$$ 6r k p'\ lr r 11\ll
)6 i'S
,J l;
fll .I
-J -n t\i
\9 :r _l
N
rj
z o fl
m
m
J
o z
txO
s-' -Rc
::- ct
:*- '^_.{-Sc\
y:- O,
r I r1-------rr l
I
\
I
PT nl €m
a){
m .t-
m
{o z
I
\)
\
tIl !l1 IJ
t
\
(
\\l\ ,.\'( t)lii' {$ i | 1,, t' 'r li $\ -- tr t r.' I i\!.) *1, l j ill I ;' N \)\- (l
-L- T
\\'
I
I
I
J.,tt
G
6 c
.F
7 I
t -l
G p
s
?
o q
I
Titr.rir c,{ '.Ja i. l.
:15 5. i:;- t:irrt "tq er'i F:nacl
'--rai i , llr-,1i:r';rdn il1. &:157
{ lj,l:.!; ) 4 l$-}=r:r{:1i:J
F ]:irr i+n;rl ;;tii'* t.t ti:l-e*cJ i:iri
tfrer l !lil$ Uni it:i-nr -qlti idinct {:rrrl {:
Fr-n jr,:-c:t Lii * ile:il..lIl...L.. liE:i:)iilElqci;
Addr"*.,'r;lr,' :lili:: SilllklliL.FiFlY IJ[:i: I!/Fi D.=rtt*t Or-:tut:eir i], l9fJT
r-.ltll,l t r-.:ictr:ir s r,\KO5A {:OI{ST.
l-h:r:r..rp.:rnr:'1: li.:i Ar"r.:hi telt: Ef{Ifili JilHN$UN
1-;.p:;l nf llrin s:it * V--hi [:rigi nlrrr]r-: I'iONil
[;'.i. ;in::; Err ami trer'; ,]fJE NORF(M
f'l .iF-
r: -ffrtl c*cl{r i tr-.irr= .i i =t:r=d in Llri= rF.-,scrrt- dI-El r-rDt i n L ri-'nrj r+d tr: he c-r i:nmpl.fiihe
1:i. sit j. rig n-f rrl1 rur:.sri h1* ccids !'"r.l,rqr.ri rr:msnt:; in tht: 1?fi8 UfI[. it is ;r Llr.ri dtl hr:
s,.r.l rc1::e':d .iei:::t-:i *rii:: t.;{ {-fiE: r:nclp"
iir:F'i\t,trrT I {.lN niREtiTIl-ii'l Slliii'lilFrftT tr-lFti:ft INt.Ri:,l$t= FiRI; FF{IITEU-i-1ni'J
hlilFlTH Fi-,-:lper-t7 i :i. ne &6. i-t Fe*L 66. i-) Fg-'rer1
i-:- i;i 51- Frcll::erly I :i rru ill'' " C F clr*{: ?,/. i} Fmu't
iillljTl.l I'r-rb 1 i. q: r.ii:1y 97., i-t Fee i: 7;. i:] Ffils|l:
lAlEgl Fraperry' l:!.ne {:il" t-i Fe*t J:}f - i:) F:t}€}t
Ar-*::,1 :i. rt r: r- t'.1 '.,r n r,-: cI l. lltJ. {li11l{ 'i:r:r' urtln arF.ir r-, n I *; i clE;s'' "
r'L.$c[ I'iAX Fl-il( i\RE:f,i ALI-OhtEt] FlFi lr] STFilll$f.iiit"lI
i, Iir,+eil L i. rir3 It:; rf,: S6tl t.,n 1 i ni i. L Llr.l c.r [,:
T l"*1. F:fti:i Fl_.ilnF( .J!6t_t rrl i.irritrri rr;..
iJ iirrr:rl 1rnil l{;:i ci f': 1(-i&7 LJril i riii tr,:rj i:}l'
TllTrii' Fi.iFi fL-CJilR 1i-i67 i.Jrilimit:r+d fil:
1. lir*el li ng Fi;i: r:l: d:r$li LJnl i mi t e::d ci i.,:
T{:rT rii_.. F: i]l.i l::i.._ i'lR Cr6J UnI i m:i t-er,l oi::
Fi..l:ll.l":Il\i[i l-fiTAl'" :S'/{) ijnliiniterj ir;.,
v
l-o{t-{flj ti .J.
{l*i:ir: r'evi i:.-r'.J I i:r- i
[]r'n.ir*-c.: [: Iil " I Lrf-i!i:1. 1..|.... Ff.$] D:::.hl[!i"
Fril i:ii"'r,;s.',; I ;'i:::j:.1 SNLli,JEl[:l;iRY fjFi I \'rI
rrHt"i:.i{il:jR i.'.tfril.:.. F IF{E: fi'qIIf.tLi5 fif,lli nFE.l.l :lhiff l-:'l1ol-E.lll-Iilf.i
l*i:I+ ,i.7*A l l-at:ile fj*A
tJt]FiTll firqs I snlJ-f Fl FIF$T
{lu[ FF:|' Ni]r.t--i:{Ft$ t.tFf,'Jti r.irF:ti t"t(]ht-HRG nFr.tfi BR{.i Nilr\l*iJR{ri l]Fr.lG FFIIi NnN-Bftfi UFlf.ltj
inJi|.l- iilili- l- F'!:tU-f l{}.rl-1" bjfrLl- PRIJI hii{L-L- t'lAt..t.. FrRfiT i,JAt-"L. lrAl*l-, f 'fril"i
l1.j i-tj-i r- rJ i"r..-- f'jnne i-ll-r r- (-rfi r- I'li:rie i:lht- r-,iir lr.lar.rs! f,jnr l:.lhr i{orr(t
'i, h* siltr.r- i. r;r r'lal. ] qi. rrav bp r:tf f:I]ltFul]] I Ell.Fi ni;;rtr*ri ':.1 . !i*r: ,I3t:l"
l\li.irr* ---- Fi r*r f ir r'r pr-u[:.ec i: i ui-r rt r] r-t.i. rrriml?n Ls f nr u1.lr.'trt.ttq+:.
F:'r'*t --.. J:ellrir-rE$. cir r- rn to hE: pi-t:l::r,ict ti*ri mitir IL/4 frr' {ir-g ;ie;sF$ttll i6}ti.
s;i:r:li (:l: i,i'rE* av-e.r nF lfi,= u-rall in;+il ! rni-iiii,, sec,.:,::?i-):; . {h) 8i i.:rl:I E: 5*A
i'la:r:i rrii.rn *i.rrqltr* brj ndt:i",i :;i:tl is S4 sq"-f t r..rith nu iJi rliensii on
filr'{,ir- *t L t:ir- tir*ti l.i ler.,:t. ---- Snc, 4:i;i:l/:ir. il-r }
f'itr[:' --- gi r+rr:i. i-r qJ.:i iir'!:r i-iut pierrmi t Ls:d i.n tfii:i !.'r *n 1 :1. ,
+ --- l-hi+';r": utrr.l. .l i+ lrii,ry hFi r-uqlii r. i*d tn havt+ a p;.rr-;r5:ret lJal :i. ;1{l i ncfie*i;
abr:ve Lni': r',_rut i nr;" Tira,, par-ap:et w;il. i i:i, r-nc1ni i-riti:l tr:i have Lirle gi*ne
{: i r''= t.*i{:i.n!l f;i'-+ i'-he r.+ai 1, lies ser:'L.i o., 1;".,t7. {sr de't;ii i. e .:rnd L"rcEptii {:lns.
nTHEF: [rL' J L]i I hiG ELEi'lHhlTgj T"rtr 1 s J.7*il
E,l-h.t'li::t.lT t'lA-f F-F{ I ftL F':A-i I f$G r'lnT[::i
.[ni:ei-:i,:ir- h{ei+r-:| t1! i.Ja,!. I t-lny i-} lir-
Irrtsir-i ni rri:r;-ihr-6 !d,i{l:l iiri.,1 ti irr
iti^r.t;: i:. i.ii-.,r I Fr'"irm* Finy r:l h
[:-r'Lrlr*i r-"11- litr-Llct i::rlrriiu ftri.: t:] hr' *]il+:: -t r:ol:rrilt-e ++.|'
fil-rei: t E.ni:1r,=rrr* Fln:/ J. hr'
Fli::r::!r-..'iie:i. li.ng rl*i;*mb']y Any t.! hr
Flur.r'f I fl,:: i. I i ng f,!$js.enril l. y Arr;. i:j hi-
!.1 l.si r':i AI]',.' Ncna
NiitTH: SEle 3+:c " L7i:!tu. ia) -inr llhatf -1. Enci os,itre E:ii{:i:pti ()ri:i.
Ffitl T l'lf.l -l-lL{:i :
1) Fli iri. rl r,., rrr run {}ii L.Eri. irf- f,.i,:Jt'.l aL,*n bag;si::l cin g}i LE:r-i. or hr-9, r.Jarl i. r-€?qLlir-emerrt.-."
*{: ijUfrft l'J{lY i:,ii:[rff l;:(Ftl- j. fi lrlij
tljtj !-r l:':l f" i:..tCiLr l-. F.i:rfl
i\nD I1 l: flf'IAl.- ,'--:l[:.f;fil.-iriT I flNS
FtiF{ Rf, llJt;1j{.JFAl'Jt]Yr
r"x I -i rrinuuiF:il"l[t'Jisr
FL i!C:t'i[: i]'-:r":LJFi.\f.'iT f{ur'lLt[F{ E.XIT' FrS,N;r r(fiTfi.i }ilr'!:l FiflTF$
LfiAD RE{]LJ I iiE0 i4I f.}l-j.-{ l-.i L " I HDliFi [nf if-i I $C]li iil.l I hlfi
.i ll'.^rgil. l.:i.rie .: 'l i:r. 1 f.lc Nr;: f{.1R
Tn"ifll :1; ; i :) ri" J. { 0. i. ) I.Jo l,Jo FliR i+ll
:"1 i-irrrr+]. .i. :L n 4 I 1:j, I Na i'Ja N./li
l-illi]'i- ri I ( 'i. i r:]., .i {: {)" } ) l"lu I'im I.l,/R
1 llr+*l r i riq ; J. {::r,, il I',ln l"ia N/Fi
TtrTAL ;:: .i t 1) {:i"{:)i (i, 1i 1ln Ni: N/R
I i:';iqle 'l* .:i
Cc:de i- ev i er+r 'F ri- :
Fi- c:.i r:r: 1. 1 cJ ,, : ['fiH 1, l."l- ti[l] l llE:l'li:t:
i:i rlrir':::i'.':r :'A:;15 5f.ir:lNF[:ftFY DRM-
D r:r- gii.n:i rrg i:i ha:-crri i:n 5rlc " .:;.I.i:rri . ttr ) r:i=s:pt- a= notr:cl ,
fJc-rltp.,r,nt I r::;-.iij i. *. L, a:;+,lr:l cin faL'.1 r"+ .jl1-Fr"
l.lt.imh: er u$ r::.r.i [:r ili b.r**:r'ri nn -['ahl e :i;J;" 4:! e;ri:ept Jrii' l-lotE:d.
[:i::.it i+:Ldtl-r :i*; h,,r'=E:ri i:r-r 56:'r:. ;i3{)f,, ib) "Tfi* n r.lrrti r..',r'* i.n i ] .ir el i nrl rtrjel nci:irn;:nt L r:acji nflt J:r'c:rii 'i: 1*cir':l ahr:+g thig
{.i. nnr-, .--- iri':::r:, j;l;il:.I, {b)
i:: il1-l-f t'.tfil E.$ I
::l) ]:i*"r:llyilent* ,,irld f L l:i':rr-:l abr:vF ther ?i-rcl -Fluri:r' i:rre rs(JLti red tn h"-rve f e;.ti tg.
- 'Je*,, Li lIi-t.:i; " {a) SgE: E:rtsr:iirrrr-,-
*'f ir l. ti: i'JnTilSl:
il r.tai.rwali ir: ,s d u.re..l. I j.riq mri*;t hel *ri I s,ast fi6 inchs:: ,,,{ide" '.--- glrsc,, l:.it16. (b)
Tf"rr,i trrF....i i. int..im r-i :ir-ii c,+ a .s'{:r*p :i. r, S inch{*!!i ti.n d the iiliniml.{n-r r- l.$-i i..* I r ncf-ier1...--- iiiE:c, ::;r;i_l,i:' " ({:) :llc. *t:L
Fr"*vi rJe, .:L h;rridr';.ii l. an r:ner si de, .:i sit;r:. rr"ra;.' i34 tn ;iU i. ncfr(!!i atll$ve thel rro:;i. ng j. {
1;. fi i}i- i: i:a r".ir-;.:r 1: h;ri-r 4 r-:i. g;c-:i-:1. ---- 5*r:. .JJt-:t5, t j j
i:r'r:v j. Je ,:r i..1r..rar- d r;'ii. j. r,rherer drap rr-F-f r.; gr-r*.t+:r th;(fi :l;t-i' inclics- lYi *i mltm hc:,1 q;l-i t ,,' li* :L|icilr'jsl r'Ti a:.i i ilr r-r iTr $[ir-irr il.irf $i;ie "= l: :i. r'rfii-ri*'=;, ** lie$, ].;7 1.!.. t.r]l ,:: :l
The+ tii:i. tii tiit-.ini h**tcir"Dt:ffi is 1..r -Ft. * [] incfiei;.. --*. IJElr. filit-:i: " ii:]
[:riL:]. f]:i i:,--J lt:.;ai::1r: !itj,i:{cF LliideLL jir: s{-airE ji= ;-cqr-ri r-*d ti:, he pi-6i-saiBd ,1E r-iitJLtir-;,(l
{*:r- liir' {: i.r'-*--rsriii *i:.:i v* {:nn* [i-l..rf 1:i. r]n " --' [ir"i:] " lif,{iC:" {ni
f;iil{ 1i; I iri{i F.:fii]il.i REIf'tEt.iT $ :;
:i. i T irr.,.'- i-c:i::{ri. ri'J *; : t.ri.:, !.,i-ri i. di rrr.r i= -rut r-*qL-ri re d l: r-, b* |i.r-s., r-etal''d;i.nt "
- - i*ri:1 t+ J!l*'i:.:
.-li.,l"it_l!"ii.r'l-iL: i:;F:'l:il.!'\.11.:: i....il.ri: $fF.it"Fl.i'lil::
i:r' l- r:i ll i il F .L F' F:. F.i r: 1.1 t..1 .i itl-. f.J E: N T ii i
t{tr-l!.-l* illilfi [i.I l-. 1. lil!.i F ]. i'i l iiii:
l.i hliil I .-,:r-i rl r..+,:i. l. i. ni.; 4t ,".:ih r'iii]Li.,r i iil:i arF.: r+qrri r u:,d 1.c: comp1r' hli th
.:] i,,,, ': ., + : i-j 4 ,, i i+ ) ii fi ii -f
,..u ir .L ri;, .rl. :.:- .- Et ,
1ir'j i-;;rr 1:t":'r: i iril r:ri v';a.i.1.:; *lnd r:uri i. i. riq ;rr-e r-alqrri. r"etcl tn fiave ;r Cl a::E; l.
'{: I J.r n; t:r ;p }'- s:l;il{l r-,;rLi rr,.,l " *-- lie* . 4:i:14" (Lr )
i iii:lUl...i.ll L lFi lri0l FSi I
J.) All i r-i::r..rl..rti nrr riiatpr'i aL inrlL.rrJi nB f ai:: ingE: ;rra rerqirii-ecl te IravE .n { I anis--
cpr-i;:.lcl i-*Li ni.i l-:1{ 15 rlr- 1+;ii:;* ;-lncl a ih;iiiimt-rin sfllr.r l:: ii.! den,:ij.{:y e:-i 4.5;-i ltnl es;::l
i i- ir irt ;r r:nnr*al r:il *pi;ii:u 'tind thi? -i' aci n,-t :is in c*n l:;qct with * i,{al I t:i-
c+i. f. i rri.t,, -'* 5*c.: " 1713" {r} l:ii{::, ++:
;i |: iifiiii i:i.L;,rs:,ti.c i n';:it.rl. at:i orrr" ,+t*H r"r:ilr.r:i. rerrl t r.L b*: prni:e*teid. *.-- $::c, 1.713"
fjj--rqI i: hlLi i:lI;t,!i.l .l Flf:l1E.l'll 'jj;
i) *i1 .i. ii i,a:: i. nE in ii.*.:r.-rrr!r:lLs 1t:r:;iLi.r'iiq;' j.r rtlt:lr-.ri r qiri:J to L:s m{ 8.1+E:ty
i;i,e:r:i-rrq ir:,,:Ie;-i,,rI ---- Siic, 54ti:6, (d)
o ir';tee ,li 4
i.-Cid,: r.*i.i (j-r t\i "f: i-) i- i
i:' r' i: .j r,: r '1.: 1 cl ,, I il {-1 i-l I i... l.-. I;t E: Ll l. tl E hl t: t:.
r:]dcJi''cs:; r iB55 5il.lil[.lFFi;;Ry iift ]:'Jli-
iiDl : -f I ul lAL FiF.i;tM. ftEr-iEi'lTu :
1":r-,9 fi,:i i:i t::*. r.,rl"J.ii n c: y
frl. i 1-:;,r'[ li l r::t:iri:ri, ,, !+i+t i:-r' t]. n:ltl [: f,$rrrpfiI-l::nrts]r'rt.!L, -1.;'Lltndr-."- y-Doili$ J(rl d $i tni i ar'
llr {si.iai riita.l.} b* prrv:iije*ij +ril:h fiaf-utr-*1. ..rer,i-rt-.:i. i.;:it i r:rr if a ini''[h".ini. l:*l
ventilhtii:ii lly=trlin per 1?nA U,F..(l" cii" .1 7, eelc " .L:;:i]iir) '
i:: i i-r:ri:i l. ai::i: cfi ':rt:''-": cit-L' i-,=i1ni r-t:d i-o li.:tv e: a rni lli 'ltr-iln 1--l-rr 'f ir'e i'-atir,g Lu
tt:;: a+: tr.:t riiin;rt j. t:n caP"
Fi rr+pi ":rr e", '1: L r-.r*:i pi.pe. ;..:. r-trtll.tir-{...d {:o L: r'-, ;rr i: r: t::i';:i. hl p f ,:r cLearrinq
p Lt l'- [i Cj lii el :ii "
Ilerr i::r',.,,r{:.:i i.s,r -i:r. r€+pl J{cE1 cI-ii. firr,t.l'y cap*, .i:,c be cc,ri::triicted o-i:
ri $ri --c t]fi'lbLi:;t ah .i. i3 trr;lter i *rl :,
"lirLy nne* ,,i:,r1icl SL-rell tirLrrri rig f i reFil.ai:€: p*:r' clt+el. 1irig ,-trrj.t i..* *i 1r:wed
per- i-i:un i:;r 'u,rj. I ;nurr icifi;r1 ctrdE cii" :18, ifi-tii fl*,.t-r r: ri iio' ::.4 '
lili::pieci g1*::::i.rit:1 anrl :;l:yI i. ght:; tu b* c:tinstrt..tcter-:l anrJ j.n,.it*rL lerrl pe,r -1.988
t-J"[i"(:" *i-,J4"
Frl. l. {rie.i. Lil.rlninq.t ..lq i.t:i. piin*:n i: *h;rl 1 b*i i*s:+r..rrl"'r1 *i :llr'F l: j. r:: ient liLLLppl y o+
ri-;iirbr.i*;L:i. i-.in ,eir' tr{.i' L?S{1 iJ"l'1"t] . r:h " i".
'lri i. ;rr.'i:ri. i drrt:*:g3 i:lriri nrEir:hani rerl eriuti l.rmiliit. Eir*ri t hi E: i. rrsi.;:r]. l nd pelr i 1-e
i ,:rrii..r'i: a{: i.:Lli-tlr;. I i *1':i. rrq p*r" 19Bfi U"H"C" ch, ::" EeL:. 5{t4"
i.i1:i +;ip1i. i.:i r'l i.: irri:i nnr:l mer:h,:ri j. c.*:.1. *qr-.ripnrun'c sih*11 he ac:cesgi i:i. e {c;r'
:irrri:rer:ti.Elr-r,, :,Ei-.Ji r*r, |. i*pl,air- aftil r'€i.i. il i. .j c eai1ti3r"i t l.,Ji {:.hautt r+rTovinq]
ptjri'ii;iii(,:lit c crn:-;t i- i..r* t i *n " Pelr 19[iS U. !,1" l;:. i.fr, 5, set: " 5i.)5"
A.i] l-rr:;ni:: i r"ig *nci (:(:]i:iI ii'ig eqi..i.i ptn*irit i uc*tr+tl irr a g.rr" "tc; *:i arid uJhicl"l
il El n ti r r- * l:. i j :i irir U.l.ciL"J. 5!l;tF l: c;r- {.i.a.me shs.l l Lre i rr:lla:. }erj tri t:li thn piiots,
bnl-rit*r * ftii{.! :;Hi. h. cli r.,',:,r aL l rila'*t 1U" alrnv* {lcror-, Per- i}A$ U,.H,C, rir" 5,
rif l l i:ri.l ,i":r r flrrirl=; r,h;rl I be e'qr,rip;:ec:i u.i:ith a f l c:ur- tlraini Fr!r' 19${:}
Li. f i, i:l " {:l"i ,, 31. ,, llr.:t: , : i. 19 "
ALi f L.rt-1.1. il ri:; pi- p;i rril sh*rl L i: il i neit*j\L l t.lcl pt+r' f. ilfitl U" Pl" tj,, clt" :l-1: "
Al .i. nri;: i. r:t- i.ir'*.: r+lihalirit tJt-rct*; ,::;t-r.r 1 l. tc".i-nii. natE* r::ri tfll i:rri{::: i. iie nf ther
hi.ri i d11-rg nfld sf-raill t.re eclr-rippr:d l+i th .r h,:ctr,: ilr-a*t d,:rnpei',
d:r.1. I 1:r i:i l- ":il:i I i:: r,+i:l:er sur;ipi y l ir;ali:i shal i 'n* 1:r-cii:ec{:ed kJitlt epl:r-rrve,J
Li,ai:l:{.1. i-r'vt iJ rr'.,, il i:r,trii tcl Frr"€rv{*nt crL:}*:!i r:cirinertrr:ri,, i*:r Lar,+n s;::iriril:1t:.r's; .:t ri rJ
i:: ri i I r.t* :l
Fri trtr: iJ i:ir- {:+ r..r, 'i: Lmnr dr'".,.j. n* ni,ry lnt- he crinrie",r: hed 'l: i: tfiel h.rir.i 1. r{i ng
r+a.rEtr.: "*ni:l vpnt 1i rrr_..;:, r_rni *llg ai.l rJ Ari iiFFf..r:-!v{:irl .i ncep{:i:rr- ii: i n.:;{:.r11. t:d,
l,icli:ri I'Lrr-r"ri iic,i sl-c.rvc: must. mcpt ${: J]:. r.-' o{ {](1li:]r-:,do r-e,q,-.ri rel-mr.:ni::=, in
adili Li. nrr t* :: L;triLi"1r'-i:l ct:cle i-r+nLri r'emerrti;,
v
F',r n ':- 3,1 f-ii
{.ir:r:J e r- i*v i !:it4t J: i:l!'- ;
F rr:i-i ei,.i:. L l cl ., : |] AFiI i.-.L RE:S 1D[:F.{i.][
;lddi-c.rgEr ;j[55 SNni{F[FiRY IiFr IVL.
Fi'- r:v:l c:lii+ a i''l i ri citlr'J crt- tJol:]r' tr: i:fre **:.rt*r'. i. i:r r* i: r'i..ini $vqr.-r- y r- c.rc,;ti t"ti::,.[1d f clr
*1eleFi.nq. --- {i*+r: " l:(:trl-,
A r...i:i. nijsw nir..r*:1. ;:r-nvi.rJ* ;r r:: L*ir rFrnn riir Ei;r o{ ii"? ccl" {t, , .:i t::Lrrar- hr:i. ght
ni: *:: li ir:cl-rr.i';1 rilr^ri1 i:| ,:i fnar widIFr i]i: :lJ i.ncha':i; {nii rri rnr-tin) . --- 5erc" 1:t14.
i;1. t hiriliiti:it:i.sf i clflrTlji; r'r:r]Lrir-t* cl:; te'ri r:r" g1*::ecl ;rpenings tlqr-ta1 t.ct 1t:.:)"/. tr
rnl:re o1: t l-i t.: {:1. rii:ir EF e?.{. ( i.ri ll-! i;q" irf., i ---- 5e*,, 1?t-i5, {i:}
i:ii I li*h:it*h je f- r:](]m|'j,; reqr-riF fj i{ri clpr+r =-rll 1.e r:ir{-er i i:r r:perninr;.5 r:qlr;t.i. tr' 5l{
rlr'" m$r*:r r,i-f l.hri+ {.tr:rnr- *i*rla" imirr 5 Flq"+1:" ) *'- ller. " 1?t-iS= {,li)
'J-ii * irri rri iftl.rflr re,,:i 1i rrg :ifr a liebit:ible :;F;ice is l/ f *tir'i- 6 i nchees. ei:cept
j,: : !:chr,::r-r:;, li,a.i. 1. iil . $ricl Lf, i3 l- l't s; rn "r
'',/ irniv{r 6 i:e:i 1:inil he;iqhl c{ 7 f eet, -*
Cl:r-r- -- .. ', -f f .'l I : l
Fri::r, i. i:ir-.:r a :imrl,;* rJrterc.tor :. n .El. i irr ei;r.*; l-inr,i rrg rnf f,- €n':ie Lct gI fsE,Fi nlJ
Fni:lrii:;. --- 'illriln,, 1iili-:" tai 4"
F'r-uvi d6: a sfiiol::fj c!E|tecLt:rr L'lr-| iil I *isc'r"'-:i Lii;*t i$ cilnrrectE:'cl tr: an E-rI iirrTl
ar-rilil:i.r,+ irr +11 :::1r:leL,.irie af-€l#!i:. ---- 5r.:c, 1:j j.il , {.r)4,
Project Application
,^," ql/o/€b ]"
Proiect Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner. Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot (/ , encx ? , ri,ng /.t l4r/.--,-.--y'r, ,\. ton. P/s
Com menls:
Design Review Board ,^" {tdro
Motion by:
Seconded by:
DISAPPROVAL
.rcr
Staf f Approval
l5 narV'(rn^ trA\
I a
f*,ru",', i 1990
t
'T\\tg \g -I(V'- 7Pc'oft-
"-- vo{* u$/t6 \FJ
DRB APPL,ICAEION
71-
oeAPPLICATION ITECEI\:/ED :
(30 DATE OF DRB I,IEETING:
ln (
Ou
'ILL NOT BE ACCEPTED I'NTIL AI,L INFORI.IATION
Produ l:ntruc:
neeting with a planning staff mernber is to determine if any additional :ded. No application will be accepted
Lete (must include all iterns required bv strator). It is the applicantrs
nake an appointnent with the staff to find nal subnittal requirements. Pl-ease note cplication will streamline the approval
proJect by decreasing the number of
roval that the DRB nay stipulate. ALL
oval must be resolved before a building Application will not be processed
Lgnature.
PROJECT DESCRIPTIO". .O'.. '' ?C<=
6a-ee,.-:
A,
B.I,oCATTON OF PROPOSAL!
Address ?${-g -S^rt)?..J G;e?R-q Dht> e
Legal Description r,ot 6 Block
Subdivisi on .t a:rza,-<- r'o-rrthk Zoning
c.
D.
NAI'{E OF APPLICANT:
Mailing Address:
NN,TE OF
!,tailing
Phone
APPLICANT I S REPRESENTATIVE :
Address:
E.NAIT{E OF OWNEF
SIGNAII'RE(S):
Mailing Address:
Phone
Condoninium Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE: The fbe vil1 be paid at the tirue a building pennit is paid for.
VALUATION FEE
S lo. oo
I 25.00
$ 50.00
$100. 00
s200. 0o
$300. Oo
F.
G.
$o I 10, oo1
$ 50, OO1
s150, 001
$500, 001 $ over
- S lo,- $ 50,
- S 150,
- s 500,
- S1, ooo,
$1, ooo,
000
000
000
000
oo0
000
Phone
(ovER)
II. IMPORTAI{T NOTICE REGARDING ALI, SUBI'IISSTONS TO THE DRBS
A. fn addition to meeting sublnittal reguirenents, the
appJ-icant nust stake the site to indicate property
lines and buitding corners. Trees that will be removed
nust also be marked. This work must be conpleted
before the DRB visits the site.
B. The review process for NEW BUILDfNGS will normally
involve two separate ueetings of the Design Review
Board, so the applicant should plan on at least two
- meetings for a final approval .
c. Applicants who fail to appear before the Design Review
Board at their scheduled rneeting and who have not asked
for a postponement trLll be reguired to be republished.
D. At the dlscretion of the zonLng adninistrator, the
following iterns may not have to be Presented to the
Design Review Board. They, hovever, have to be
presented to the Planning Department for approval:
a. Igindows, skylights and sinilar exteri.or changes
that do not alter the existing plane of the
building; and
b. Building additions that are not viewed fron any
other lot or public space, which have had letters subnitted froxr adjoining property owners approving
the addition; and/or aPproval froro the agent for'
or manager of a condominium association.
E. you may be required to conduct Natural Hazard Studies
on your property. You should check with a Town Planner
before proceeding.
-J.J o
o^r" br/('/' ?'t,
Project Application
( ^,/ .,,. ((
Proiect Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot L atocx ? , rltne ) fet t' 1''t , zone
-
Comments:
L)
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Su m mary:
,,''' ,7t . l' ,/
./. _: ./.( _>J t-t n . u
Town Planner
, /.../o.l Date\''1/r,'t1'v //
\,",,
Approval
o t
t
PI.ANNTNG
The Planning and Environmental conmLssion rneetJ'ng was called to
order at 2zAS p.n. Chuck Crist lras Present,for the site vl'sits'
and was absent-at the beginning of the meeting. He was expected
to return.
Due to the
rneeting.
ftem No. 23
late start, Item No. L was postponed to the end of, the
A recruest for a setback variance in ordef to
at Montaneros Condolfliniuns located at 641 w.
Lionshead Circle, Lot 8, Block 1. Vail:lionshead
3rd Filinq.ABtrrlicant: Montaneros Condominiurn AssociatLon
Andy Knudtsen explained that the board had seen this item at the
previous PEC neeting for an exterior alteration request. The
reason it was before the board again was that staff had not
published for the variance' The reguest net the criteria and
findings for variances per the staff memo.
Diana Donovan asked for public conment and there was none.
A notion -to approve the setback variance per the staff nemo
was rnade bv Kathy Warren and seconded bv Jim Shearer
VOTE: 6-0 IN FAVOR
Iten No. 3 was postponed until later in the neeting-to allow J1.11
xannerei€o conter lrith the applicantrs representatives.
{t
AND ENVIRONI'TENTAL COIIIMISSTON
Augrust 13, 1990
Present
Chuck Crist
Diana Donovan
Connie Knight
Ludwig Kurz
Jim Shearer
Kathy Warren
Da1ton tlilllans
Staff
Kristan Pritz
Mike llollica Jill Karnnerer shelly Mello
Andy Knudtsen
Betsy Rosolack
Penny Perry
Item No. 4: A request for a walI height variance and an
amendment to the approved access plan for both lots at 145 and 126 Forest Road. Lots 5 and 6,
Block 7. Vall Village lst FiLinq.Applicant: Ron Byrne
I.like uollica presented the proposal for staff explaining that the
appl.icant was requesting a waLl height variance and an anendment to an approved access plan. Mike reviewed a brief history of the project and the criteria and findings for a variance. The staff
recommendation was for approval of ttre proposed wall height
variance reguest, per the drawings subnitted by Gordon R. Pierce,
AIA, dated July 23, L99o as amended July 26, 1990. Staff felt that the curlent proposal \tas a substantial decrease from the original PEC approved variance and was now in conformance with
the Townts zoning code. The staffrs recommendation was
contingent upon the applicant maintaining a comnon shared
driveway for both Lots 5 and 6. The staff recornnended denial- of
the applicantrs reguest to arnend the approved access plan.
Jay Peterson, representing the applicant, presented three scaled
nodels for the PECrs review. one depicted the PEC approval, one the DRB approval and the other depicted the proposed walls. He
stated that the applicant wished to table tbe reguest to amend
ttre access plan. Jay explained that he felt that the current
proposal was a better solution than the original approval. The tot-I sg. ft. of walL area had been decreased substantially. A
large everltreen tree was being saved. He apologized that ttre
applicant had not sought PEc approval before beginning
construction on the wall.
BilI Post, representing Mr. and Mrs. Mossman property owners to
the west, explained that the lilossmans lrere concerned that their
vlew would be obstructed and that a maximum height of 3 ft. on
the upper wall vould be acceptable.
Discussion tlren centered around what grade would be used to
detemine the interpretation of 3 ft. by Mr. Mossman, and Mr.
Uossman pointed out the area of concern on the model .
cordon Pierce felt that he could work wltlr 4 ft. but 3 ft. night
not be feasible to design.
Bill Post felt that 3 L/2 feet vould be acceptable and the
applicantrs representatives agreed.
Diana Donovan wanted it clarified, for the record, that the 3-l/2
feet would be above original grade, not present grade.
,Jay emphasLzed that the applicant rpished to table the requested -auren'drnent to the ascess plan and DLana fel.t the PEC could proceed
sith the variance as long as the applicant and ilay understood that the accesr plan would be tabled with the understanding that
only 1 curb cut was approved.
LudwJ.g Kurz questLoned why the two amendnents cane in together
and lrtike explained the staff felt the one curb cut was one
consLderation for allowing the wall height variance fron the start.
Jin Shearer felt that the reduction in height did inprove the
area. He rranted to see the landscape plan tied into the
approval .
Connie Icright stated that lf the applicant wanted to Propose 2
curb cuts, she did want the applicant to be required to cone back to the PEC. She also wanted to see the topo map attached as Part of the rnotion.
Diana conmented that she voted against the wall height variance
the first tine it was before the Board. She felt that boulder
walls, as originalty proposed, were different from veneer walls'
as currently proposed. She stated that steep hlllside lots sere
not supposed to be rnaxinized. Bulldings on this tlpe of lot
shoutd be constructed without destroying the site.
Kristan asked Jay what he ecpected to galn by tabling the
amendnent to the access plan and Jay explained that he slnply
wanted tine to look at the possibl-lities. He felt he night
redesign the house on the other lot to ellmlnate retalning walls altogether. He sinply did not want to have to reapply due to tbe
publishing tine delay.
Jay wished to clarify to Kathy warren that if she voted against
the proposal, the applicant could build the wal1s as previously
approved. He fett the current proposal was better.
Kristan conrrented that the staff supported the variance reguest
because the they felt that the current proposal was better than
the prior approval as it decreased the amount of the variance.
Mike explained that.lf the current proposal was denied, the
applicant would have the right to construct the previously
approved plan as Jay had explained.
A motion to table the anendment to the access nlan to the
Septenber 1O. 1990 neetina was made bv Jin Shearer and
seconded bv f,udwiq Kurz.
VOTE: 5-1 IN FAVOR OF TABI-,ING IIITH CONNTE KNIGHT OPPOSED
Connie felt a chance to
both l-tens
that tabling the juggle the issue
as proposed.
access itern would give the applicant
and felt theY should have voted on
tr2 feet above the topo nap of 8/7/90
and seconded bv Jirn Shearer
Condl-tions:
Presented.
Kristan felt that the notion could be per the staff memo with the
exception that the access plan was tabled'
Ludwiq amended his motion to state per. lhe staff $erno' Yith oriion r'ras tabled with
e. Jirn ghearer seconded the
amended rnotion.
OPPOSED
board wished to have final comments on the project stated for
record as follows:
1.
2.
llhe
the
Ludwig Kurz:
Dalton Wilti-ans:
Diana Donovan:
He uas not happy that the developer had not
come in an appiopriate manner or tining with
the project.--He-did feel that the current
propisai was better than the previously
approved ProPosal .
conmented that as he looked up the hill, he
did not like to see aII of the walIs. He
felt there night have been other $ays'- He
encouralted the applicant to look at ottrer
options-for the other lot to the east'
Voted in favor strictly on the basis that the
current plan was bettei than ttre P5evious plan. sle did not believe in height
iariances in general and did not feel that
the house was-designed to fit this lot'
Voted against the proposal for the same
r"iJott=-"s Diana statea above. She had voted
no it". the beginning of the previous
proposal .
gathv warren;
Jim Shearer:
cglrnle Knioht:
ften No. 3:
Voted in favor because the current proposal
was better than the previous approval' He
dia not want to see the appllcant before the
S"itd regarding the adJacent fot and did not
want to iee the sane llrge anount of drive in
tlre future. lle agreed witn oatton regardinqt
the walls. tle would rather give a site
coverage variance than a retalning wall
height variance.
Connie stated that she had already mentioned
her reasonE.
Road West.ipplicant: Anoco oil ComPanY.
JiIl Kannerer presented the proposal for staff explaining-that
aro"o Oil Conpiny-fria not coiniited to the landscape requirenents
prer"nt"a in ttre-memo as reconnended conditions of approval ..
JiIt stated that the reguest was for a condltional use petmit, a
finas"ape variance, and-a setback variance to allow the
""""irrltion of, a ienediation systen equipment bullding. Sl9
;;;i;;e the history behind the-request and reviewed the crlterra
ana rinafng for e""i, i"q"i=t. The staff reconmend"d 1P-!I:I11--?I-itre conaitional use periit and each of the variance requestE wlth
the lands""p" tt"iian-ce contingent upon,-cond+!i"f?' Jil1
introduced the ar"""-i"presen€ative-s; Mr. BiIl B1ack and Debbie
inenicie of Law nnvironiental , Tom Briner, the proJect architect,
irra Ooog and Cuny Sterkle, operators of the Alpine Standard
Station.
Diana Donovan felt that the work session gave the board ? s99d.
u"a"isi""ding of-the aesthetics of the building. she felt tbat
til;-;;;;;"t- 6i.."rsion should address the landscaplng and whether
the Luilding vould be pernanent or temporary'
Ludwiq Kurz asked if there waB any indication of the length of
Iir!-Ert-"-u"iiai"s would be neededl and Bill-Black.responded that
he thought Z yeais r+ould probably be suffl-cient time for the
;;r;ai;€ion slsten io ctein up tlre ground warer and subsoll
contamination to acceptable levels.
tcistan enphasized that the two year period was. an estirnate,
there were no gruaiantees as to how long the syslem would have to
i"rii" in operition and subsequently how long the building would
have to remain.
Jin Shearer asked if the structure would be removable, and Jill
stated that the building was being built as a permanent structure
with a foundation. Bill Black connented that the applicant
wanted to erect a temporary structure, but that staff felt a
temporary structure would not neet design standards.
Diana asked if the Upper Eagle Valley Water and Sanitation
District trad agreed to water discharge volunes and BiIl Black
responded that they had. He had a letter acknowledging the
agreement.
Diana asked if it was possible to shut down operations during
peak periods such as Christmas and New Years week, and Bill Black
explained that it was possible but that Upper Eagle Valley water
and Sanitation District had given no indl.cation that this would
be necessary given the volume of the water to be discharged.
Further, maximun benefits were realized with continuous
operation.
Joe llacy, representing vail Associates, stated that they woul-d
Like to see the system underway soon.
Bill Black explained that Amoco lras Proceeding without state
approval at their own risk. He wanted to emphasize the urgency.
Kristan wanted the Board to realize that the staff was in no Iitay
indicating to the Board that staff wished to hold up the
proposal .
cuny Sterkle, operator of Alpine Standard slnce L973' explained
ttrat the connunLty Developnent Director in t973, Jin Laroont, had
addressed closing the eastern access issue in tgZl and Cuny had
resisted the closing at that tirne. cuny stated that he was not
consulted by Amoco, the Town or Law Environmental about the
landscape iisue until today. The proposed access closing
concerned trin. Cuny stated he had a conversation with Jim Rogers
of Anoco tlarketing Departnent and Jin was also concerned about
ttre curb cut closing. cuny stated he needed the Frontage Road
access for gasoline tanker transport truck deliveries. He was
also concerrred that Narrowing the Vail Road curb cut, would
create a hazard when the transport truck was unloading. He
stated he barely lrad room presently for patrons to egress the
site when the tanker was there unloading. He wanted access to
remain as it was currently laid out. In the summer a tanker
could barely fit under the canopy over the pumps but in the
winter with ice build-up on the pavement, a tanker could not fit
under ttre canopy.
Jill asked Cuny to describe the unloading procedure and Cuny
described the procedure in detalI. The tankers currently enter
the Elte from Lhe Vail Road curb cut and leave the site frou the
eastern most S. Frontage Road curb cut.
Kathy Warren asked hou long it took to unload, and Cuny replied
that- if they were quick' 20 minutes, but it could take 1-V2 to 2
hours depending on products being unloaded.
Jim shearer asked how nany cars that were parked at the station
were enployee cars and Cuny responded 4. The rest of the cars
were cais waiting for work. Cuny stated that he no longer
allowed customers to park overnight at the statlon. Cars had to
be pJ.cked up on the dly senricJ.ng was conpleted. Further, lt was
deducted on Amocors quitity inspection standardE. Parking in
front of the easterly S. Frontage Road curb cut I'as not preferred. In response to a guestion fron Jin, Cuny Etated Amoco
oit co was reaponslfte for any inprovenents to the bui.ldlng- A
durnpster enclosure which was previously located on Eite vas
destroyed by trash senrLce.
Kathy |{arren asked if it would serve the station to leave the
building in place when Arnoco was done with it, and Cuny said they
could use it for storage.
Ton Briner, the architect, explained that ttre building was being
constructed so that it could be taken down. As far as the
conditions the staff reconmended on the Landscape variance, he
felt that for the loss of 250 sq. ft. of landscaped area, the staff was asklng then to replace it with 4 to 5 tine the amount.
The landscape cost would be nore than 2 tlmes the cost of the
buitding. negarding ttre proposed sidewalk installatt-on, he
thouglrt it would be more advantageous to bulld a sidewalk across
the street on the Gateway site.
Kristan explained that in reality, people walk along Vail Road on
the serrrice station side of the road. They actually cut through
the station.
Jill explained to the board that the building could be built on
the property within the setbacks. The proposed location was
chos-en Lo avoid the loss of already liuited high denand parking.
Kathy warren conmented that the proposed building would not
conpletely abut the property. There was a 2t-3t buffer between
the remediation building and the alley to the south. Slre was
confortabte with the sidewalk reguest and undergtood the access
concern. sbe nanted to see the 246 sq. ft. of landscape belng
removed be repl.aced. ln the southeast area of the Eite. She could
support this kind of a proposal .
Jim Shearer supported the proposal He was not sure how the
notLon should be structured. He wanted landscaping but aLso
rsanted to see the operation up and running and was therefore
concerned with the South Frontage Road access closure and VaiI
Road access narrowing.
Xathy warren added to her previous cornments that she santed to
see the building be teroporary and thought it was appropriate to
review the permanence issue when the conditional use perait was
no longer required.
Jim Shearer commented that he felt that the service station was
one of the best looking he had ever seen. However, he did want to see some areas landscaped. He understood the opposition to
curb cuts and would like to see landscaping per Kathy's
suggestion at tbe southeast corner of the site with a sidewalk
and sith the possible use of trees. Ile also wanted to see the
area between the station and the Holiday Inn landscaped, and a
garbage enclosure constructed. He agreed with Kathy that the
building should be temporary. Jim asked ltlr. Black what the
chances were of having to do more remediation at a later date.
Mr. B1ack explained they vould strut down the operation when the
water tested clean and that he could think of only 2 instances
where systern operation might be required again: 1) New leak--he
felt it was unlikel-y that a zone of contanination as extensive as
the current situation would occur in the further. The laws were stiffer now and to help prevent future contamination alarm
systems would notify the operator that a leak had occurred. 2)
If the criteria changed to be rnore rigid standards, future
remediation could be possible.
Connie Knight agreed with Joe Macy that the project needed to be
started as soon as possible. She dldn't feel that the board
needed to take unfair advantage of the situation in a search to
gain landscaping against an environmental issue. She felt an
annual review was imperative. She also felt the structure should
be removed vhen ttre remediation system was no longer in operation
and that a sprinkler system in the existing and souttreast
proposed landscape area should be installed by the applicant.
Connie guestioned the siting of trees so close to an
interseCtion. She felt the planting could be a safety (Iine of
sight) concern.
Dalton WiIII-ams wanted to see a tenporary building and a garbage
enclosure. He was not in favor of closing the South Frontage
Road access or narrowing the Vail road curb cut. He was in favor
of a sidewalk along vail noad as weII as additional landscaping
on the southeast corner of the property. He rtanted to see lrnaturerf trees planted to screen the cars and did not think
siting trees in the southeast corner of the site would be
dangeious. He was in favor of proceeding as expeditiously as
posiiule but not as a sacrifice to landscaping.
Ludwig Kurz commented that the other board members had stated his
feelings. IIe wanted the project to Proceed as expeditiously as
possible, however, he also felt landscaping needed to be
addressed.
Cuny stated he felt ttrat Amoco wouLd cornmit to the landscaping
and garbage enclosure as discussed by the board.
Diana asked what would happen if the noise was excessive?
Kristan responded that staff didnrt feeJ. it would be a problem to
add a condition of reviett regarding the noise and that the
applicant had l-ndicated they would be willing to add additional
insulation if the staff felt the operation of the systen created
excessive noise.
Diana wanted to see the existing landscaped areas rrspiffed uP"
and additional landscaped area as Proposed by Kathy with trees as
high as possible without creating a hazard to automobile traffic.
She also wanted the building to be ternporary and removed when the
rernediation systen Itas no longer in operation. Diana also
indicated she felt the construction of a dumpster screen ltas
necessary and that if noise J-s a problem, staff should negotiate
with Anoco to add additional sound insulation.
per the staff memo with the followina qonditions was nade by
Kathy Warren and seconded bv Connie Kniqht.
conditions:
1. Annual review and approval of the Conditional Use
Permit bv the PEC. The Conditional use permit for the
remediation svstem shal.l terninate when the unit is no
Ionqer necessarv, Annual review to address sound level
emissions.
2. Approval of a landscape variance.
3. Approval of a rear setback variance.
4.The building be tenporarv. If the applicant desires
the buildinq to renain, the apDlicant must obtain PEC
approval.
VOTE: 5-O-1 IN FAVOR WTTH CHUCK CRIST ABSTAINTNG STNCE HE
T{AS ABSENT FOR THE I,IAJORTTY OF THE PRESENTATION
FI II F nn
b"*vllH
o r/:rn
A motion to approve a recruest for a rear setback variance per the staff memo was made bv Kathv Warren and seconded bv
Connie Kniqht
VOTE: 6-O-1 fN FAVOR WITH CHUCK CRIST ABSTAINfNG
A motion to approve a recruest for a landscape varlance per
the staff merno with the following conditions was made bv
Kathv t{arren and seconded bv Connie Kniqht.
Conditions:
1. Applicant comnitment to cleanup and uPgrade all
existing landscaoed areas per Tor,rn Landscane Architect.
Comrnunity Develonment Director and Town Enqineer
aporoval.
2. Applicant commitment to provide a curb. qutter and
sidewalk off-site alonq the west side of Vail Road per
Town Landscape Architect, Communitv Development
Director and Town Enqineer anproval.
3. Approval of dumBster location and screeninq prooosal bv
the Desiqn Review Board.
4. Landscape area of 250 so. ft. be provided on site in
the southeast area of the site and alonq west edge of
Vail Road in eonjunction with a 6r wide sidewalk with
curb and qutter oer condition #2.
5. To upqrade all existinq landscape areas between the
Holidav Inn and the Station per Landscape Architect and
Departrnent of Cornmunitv Development.
6. A Tenporarv Certificate of occupancv shall not be
released for the rernediation building until all of the
improvenents. outlined in conditions 1',2..3' 4 and 5
have been conpleted or a letter of credit is provided
to the Town of Vail to cover the costs of these
improveurents.
VOTE: 6-0-1 IN FAVOR WITH CHUCK CRIST ABSTAINIT--.4 Bvf F s .'C t.
Drive. Lot 6, Block 9, Vail fntermountain.
Applicanth Douq and uichelle cahill 'i2
Andy l(nudtsen the applicant farnily home.
'rc
presented the proposal for staff explaining that &
was reguesting a height variance for a new single
A building pernit had been issued and construction
10
rJ= ,rrr'a"*.y. when the applicant had the height checked to meet
ifr" ilq,tfreientE io. " friiing inspectiolt the height_exceeded.33
i""t-li i.et t".t,-a= r"""ure6 froi existing gradg. 1'wo aspects
"i-irrE piojeci wele irnportant backEround- informatlon. Ttrere was
"-""ii"-r"ining Aown tire slte, ovei whlch the house had been
l"iii which rnade i-n foot difierence between helght neaEured from
iinieft"a grade conparea to helght Deasured frol exlsting grade'
A-"""""a inportant- fact was ttrit the oltner Ehlfted tlre house
"pprotit.teiy 11 ieet after the bullding pemf!-1as lseued
;i-tlt;nt flrsi, getiing approval frorn the-Connunity Development
ilFttrn";i. tfre own6rsi-goal nas to save a 4o foot tall
evergreen tree. ay rnoving the house, ttre owner located the
;i;;il-;""i-iiag"'over tf,e swale: Andy_reviewed the zoning
""ilfa""atl.ons aid related criteria and findings. The etaff
ieconnenaation yas for denial . Given that tbere were other
;;;;ibi; iocations for the trouse ttrat would not likely have
i"q"ft.a a variance, staff concluded that there waa not a
naiasnip on ttre site.
Ludwig Kurz asked Doug cahill why he did not contact the
Corr,""iCV Development Departnent-for approval and Doug responded
that, upon excaviiion, hi was_disturblna th9 root system for the
i"J.. he did not know lre needed to return for approval .
Dalton Williarns and Chuck cri6t had no comnents'
Kathy warren felt the olrner was caught in a technicallty.^ _9h9-didntt see how the-lroblen had not occurred prior. She felt the
swale should Ue couirtea. Nornally she rras not in favor of height
variances but felt it was a technicality'
Jim Shearer asked the staff, had they been consulted, lthat- would
have been the reconmendatioir and was told that staff probably
would have recomn"ta"a noving the house down hill as well as west
oti of the swale--"o in"t it iould have conformed to the height
linit.
Jin Shearer asked bow the swale came about. It seened to be
""is"; to the lot. Doug Cahill explained that he was not sure.
stated that she had no problens with the variance'
ttrit it she felt the nove or lncrease Ln heLgbt had
prrrpos" she would not support the varLance'
Connie Knight
She commented
been done on
Diana Donovan agreed with Kathy Warren'
Knidht.
11
Kathy warren wlshed to clarify the notion stating that there was
an exceptlonal circumstance in that the building covered the
srrale, and that the swale was particular to the property, and the perimeter of the buiLding did not violate height requirenents.
Connie KnLqht anended her notion per Kathyrs statenent and
the motlon was seconded bv Chuck Crist.
VOTE: 7-O rN FAvoR
ftem No. 6:A recruest for a conditional use to e:q>and hosoLtal
space at the VaiI Vallev Uedical Center on Lots E
and F. Vail Villacre 2nd Filing (181 west Meadow
Drive) .Applicant: Vail VaIIey Medical Center
Kristan Pritz extrllained the proposal and added that the chart on
page 3 explained how parking was allocated on the site. She said that the staff recommended approval.
Jay Peterson lras present along with Ray llcMahon, the Manager of
the hospital , Dan Feeney, John Reece, the architect, and Greta
Schultz.
Jay said that Kristan had done a good job explaining the reguest
and that l(ristan had also asked for future plans. IIe said they
had prepared a wish list for her, however, there was no further
extrlansion authorized by the hospital at the moment. He spoke in
favor of tbe proposal .
Kristan said that the hospital had stated that they were
decreasing their staff and the parking was decreased to adjust to
5 fewer employees.
Chuck asked how they could have six fewer people, and Ray
explained that there had been some staff changes. Dan Feeney
explained that the department heads had been asked_to project
tfrlir needs, and therefore, they had more current information.
Chuck then asked about a hospital policy called rrredirectrr where
the hospital sent patients to other hospitals and he rras
wondering why the hospital had been put on redirect and Dan
Feeney explained that it had not actually happened yet.
Dalton then asked about the parking situation regarding the bank
purchase of 8 spaces but council apProval for only the use os
six. Jay explained that the bank had a right to buy 12 spaces
and had tle exclusive option on 8, the 8 were out of control of
the hospital . He said that the Purchase of L2 by the bank was a
worst sase scenario.
L2
I
The use of the addltional space was then dLscussed.
Diana Donovan said that the last tirne the hospital was in for a
request, the Planning Corunission had nade it clear that the
hoJpital needed to build a nelt anbulance building. Diana said
thal for consistency, the parklng spaces had to cone out without
a deficit if Iot 10 was renoved. She wanted to see thls norked
out on paper. ,fay said that under the lease agreenent' they had
a right to count the spaces on lot 1O until the lease was
terml.nated. Dlana answered ttrat If Lot 10 was no longer used,
the deficit would be made up with the valet parking. Regarding
future plans of additlons to the hospital , she did not feel that
the CornmissLon could eupport an additional floor on top of the
structure and suggested they find another place to add more
space.
Diana repeated that the arobulance building relocation needed to
be a top prl.ority of the hospital.
Connie rGight asked if there was a tlne sctredule for the list of
hospital, constructLon proposals and Ray li[cl'tahon said that there
nas no schedule at that tirne. Connie said that she did not like
havlng a learning lab converted to parking and Jay said that the
concept was to move the learning lab center and use the area as parking. Connie asked where this plan was on the Hospital Master PIan. Jay replled tbat there ldas great flexibttlty as to where
the Learning Lab could be located.
Connie asked if there was some other area that the MRf could be
placed and Jay responded that other areas had been fully utllized
and that many uses had already been relocated.
Connie felt that the north elevation was not aesthetically pleasing. sbe uanted to know if the lilRl could be placed inside
the exlstlng building.
Kathy l{arren was concerned about the brick detail next to the
concrete.
Jin Shearer spoke in favor of the improvenent.
Kathy warren was concerned that continuous infills added to the
buitding would have an inpact on the deslgn of the building. She
stated ttrat atthough they were mLnor, sbe was not in favor of
nany infills, that these desigm featuree had been inportarlt to
the Design Review Board as they added relief to the building.
Kathy agreed sith Diana regarding the Hospital ltaster Plan and
felt-th;t the relocation of the anbulance garage should be the
nunber 1 priority. she did not support the addition of a 4th
floor onto the new wing. Kathy felt that the I,ot 10 parkingf
needed to be addresEed and she questioned if she could support
this type of addltion again.
13
O
Diana Donovan felt that Kathy warrenrs point regarding the architecture uas weII taken.
Dalton asked if the addition extended 3 feet beyond the building or was just an infill and ur. Reece responded that it dld extend
3 feet beyond ttre nall .
Xathy said that the elevation did not show this clear1y. li[r.
Reece polnted out the 3 | extension of the elevation. This part
of the expansion was discussed, concerning the possibility of pulling the extension back and putting in a sidewalk.
Diana wanted to know if approving this proposal would weaken the
reguirement of relocating the anbuLance bay and Ur. Reece felt that this expansion would not effect the hospitals ability to
relocate the anbulance faciLity. He said that this MRI need carne
on line nuch guicker than they had anticipated. He did not feel
a 12oo sq. ft. expansion should force the anbulance building to
be moved.
Jay Peterson said that the ambulance buiLding was owned by the
Ambulance District. ft was very costly and the District did not
want to move it presently.
More discussion of the site plan followed and it was decided to
not place a walkway near the expansion but to continue with the
bollards and to continue with ernergency parking only.
A motion to atrprove the recruest for a conditional use permit
rrer the staff merno was made bv Connie Knigrht and seconded bv
kathy l{arren
Diana felt that the conditions should be that:
1. tlhen the l,ot 10 lease ended, the hospital be reguired to come up with additional parking on site to rneet all
parking reguirenents.
2. That the next addition of any size to the hospital
wouLd reguire the relocation of the ambulance garage.
connie Knioht amended her notion to include those conditions
as racruested bv Diana and Kathv warren anended her second.
Vote: 7-O IN FAVOR
L4
Item'No. 1: Approval of minutes from the JulY 23. 1990
neeting.
Dalton had corrections on Page 1o that he would dl-scuss wlth
Penny regarding his statenent referencing the Rekord doors.
A motion to approve the ninutes vith corrections was made bv
Kathv Warren and seconded by Chuck Crist.
VOTE: 7-O IN FAVOR
Item No. 8:A recruest for a naior anendment to sDD Nor
16. part of parcel A. L,ionsridqe Subdivision,
Filln<r 2. (The Vallev Phase III)
Applicant: Brad & Susan Tiossen
Iten NO. 9:
request for a variance to the rnaximun oercent qra4e for a road, on a parcel conmonly referred to
as Sbraddle Creek, an approximate 4o acre oarcel
located north and east of the ltain vaLl I-70
interchanqe and east of the spraddle Creek liverv.
Annlicant: George Gillett' Jr.
Iten NO. 10: A request for a maior amendment to SDD No. 4.
ColdJtrean Condominiums in order to anend Sections
A notion to table Item Nos 7, 8, and 9 until the Auqust 27'
1990 meeting and Item No. 1o indefinitelv was rnade bv Kathy
Iilarren and seconded bv Ludwio Kurz.
VOTE: 7-O TN FAVOR
& Associates.
15
o
r I '.
Item No. 1l: A recruest for a side setback variance at Lot 3,
Block 5 Vall Villaqe lst Filino. Unit 3B--Vail
Rorthouses, 3o3 Gore Creek Drive.- Applicant: Stewart Colton
Item No. 12: A recruest for a variance to Section 18.58.02O (C)
in order to construct a 5r high wood screen fence
in the 2or front setback at 9 VaiI Road--Holidav
Itouse. Lot B. Vail Villaoe 2nd Filincr.
Appllcant: Holiday House,/Pinnacle Resorts.
Item No.s 11 and 12 vere withdrawn, no action rras needed.
15
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Departnent
August 13, 1990
A request for a height variance at 2855 Snowberry
Drive, Lot 6, Block 9, Vail Intermountain.Applicant: Doug and lilichelle Cahill
DESCRIPTION OF THE VARIANCE REOUESTED
The applicant is requesting a height variance for a new
si-ngle fanily home. The building per:rrit for the house was
issued August 11, 1989 and construction has proceeded since
then. When tbe applicant had the height checked to rreet the
reguirements for a franing inspection, he found the building
height exceeded 33 feet by 4.67 feet, as measured from
existing grade.
Two other aspects of the project are important pieces of
background information. There is a swale, running down the
site, over nhich the house has been built. This swale is
approxinately 15r wide and nakes a 4 foot difference between
height measured from finished grade conpared to height
neasured from existing grade. A second fact is that the
ouner shifted the house approxinately 1-1. feet after the
building permit was issued without first getting approval rr',\,r\
from the Community Development Department. His goal was to ^a z*i!, .*\
save a 4O foot taII evergreen tree. He moved his house down
the slope and located his highest roof ridge over the swale.
II. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
1. Zoning: Primary/Secondary
2. Lot Area: 20,965 sq. ft.
I.
Setbacks:
front east side
west side
rear
Required
20.
151
15 1
15 1
Allowed
4,347 sq. ft.
I
Proposed
55 1
41r
53 1
551
Proposed
2,590 sq. ft.
4. GRFA:
5. Parking:Recruired
2.5 spaces
Proposed
4 spaces
III. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Findings, section 18.62.060 of
the Vail Municipal code, the Department of Comnunity
Development recomrnends denial of the requested variance
based upon the following factors:
Consideration of Factors:
1. The relationship of the recruested variance to
other existinq or potential uses and structures in
the vicinity.
The inpact of this variance request on surrounding
structures is ninimal in staffts opinion because the distances between structures range from 8Or on the east, to L47 | on the west. The hillside on
which the lot is located is forested with aspen trees and coniferous trees. The trees act to
screen the house frorn the adjacent properties, I-
70 and the South Frontage Rgad. The av of the site is 4ot.
A.
,r--. is d I
( A "" ;.*Lcl t" of
l*' tr' " '-k'l '
+
The height of the house wiII not stick out
compared to neighboring structures because it is
32'-5lt measured fron finished grade. The code clearly states that measurements are to be taken
from existing or finished grade, whichever is more restrictive. As a result, finished grade has no
significance in ttris analysis except to indicate that the appearance of the house will be
cornpatible with its neighbors and wiII appear to
meet code.
2. The degree to which relief fron the strict and
literal internretation and enforcement of a
specified regulation is necessarv to achieve conpatibilitv and uniformitv of treatnent anong
The swale running through the site drops to a point where the base elevation is measured from
approxinately four feet below the foundation.
fhough the height has to be measured frorn original
grade, the height from finished grade conforns to
the zonl-ng code. The swale could be viewed as a
hardship that nay justify a variance. However,staff does not support that position in this
circumstance. The swale is a site constraint, but
1..'+
I ^.isr""'
<r\
. ,. 1J",,
4ktt
]-
A.
) C'w.z 1t 6.v-.1,t
(".1 ,.r1
.c.-. hr".L1 B.
y"r,.,I< ''>
LZ, zl.-3<^-l-^' ,-"'-
'\ +tt..-,-,l .xt{ r)'t Y-a' "l '.
,l-,i'0*,,/' n''--t
| (. l -..,1 .).1 tlz\ '.t ' .l t\.tTl
,tll -s''xku a" *" "-'1
-r,.l <.-",.,.\.-.
#
,.'.-"i , '-t"
4z
y,^..1. f 3
IV. FTNDINGS
3.
.r
does not cover the entire Eite. There are other potential building aites which are out of the
suale uhere the owner could have located the house
and conforned to the code.
.r The ownqr alfr shift{d the lpuse w}thout firs!
receivirig apppoval f{m the lconnunf.ty dQvelopifent
Departndqt wh\ch credQee a dqlf-inlcsed Qards\in.
Tbe effect of the recruested variance on light and air. distribution of populatLon. transportation
and traffic faclllties, public facilities and utilities. and public safetv.
The height variance will have no inpact on the
above referenced criteria.
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the Iiroitations on other properties classified in the same
district.
That the granting of the variance will not be
detrinental to the public health, safety or welfare, or naterially injurious to properties or improvements in
the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for one or nore of the
following reasons:
1. The strict literal interpretation or enforcernent of the specified regrulation would resul-t in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this tit1e.
2. There are exceptions or extraordinary
circumstances or condLtions applicable to the same
site of the variance that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same zone.
3. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the
specified regrulation would deprive the applicant
of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the same district.
The Planning and Environnental Cornrnission shall nake the
foll.owinq findings before orantinq a variance:
c.
-r.; ea1;:;.-o,t1 oL.,'J' 3
VI . STAFF RECOMMENDATION
lt, j
I i' {, lt ti'
>' {
t
the reguest because it does not
findings.
i..,. ,r ,r-,
staff reconmends denial of
meet all the criteria and
Because of the unique site characteristics related to the
swale, one could conclude that Finding A has been met since
tbe variance would be tied to a hardship. However' the site
provides other options for the building location; therefore
staff cannot recomrnend approval.
Finding B is met as this proposal woul.d certainly not be a
threat to public safety. Finding c2 is partially met in
staffrs analysis, because the site does have extraordinary
circurnstances not found on other properties in the same
zone. The swale shown on the topographic survey creates an
extra four feet below the structure which must be counted in
the height measurement (see elevation). If the swale is not
taken into account, the height from existing grade is
i, 33.67'. This is still over the linit by 8" but the
applicant should be able to trirn the ridge and bring it into
cornpl iance.
Given that there are other possible locations for the house
that would not Iikely require a variance, staff concludes
that there is not a hardship on the site. In addition, the
process which the applicant followed (shifting the house
without the Cornmunity Development Departmentrs approval)
puts the Town of Vail in a position where we cannot support
a variance to the zoning code which could have been avoided
and which we were not consulted about.
, 1 .r')| ."i 1'-;- il' ,\., t -" '-'' 3
t' ' .!
^.
''i ir;,\ riii"-'
l, i''
.;l'' !
.1
il''
I ;l- ?'
j
1"
,\,,.-t '^"-,\"
rl.-
I
il'.
,W
I
LOT 4
-Fad
{h
7s50
sfi'
tTt
fi4d -
7g*'-
-79.60,
-l
I
'l
Ttdr
7970'-
a
7z 7?-------
J.-- _-:
-------"----o
>;<
I
'I
I
t b 9l 'R g'
I
E{4,*--" -----;:::._-. . _--:;;:: . : __ .;i;*z;-"'"
*:-,_
------'-" -)--,_j ----- "-*:-' _' . _- . -- - - ----- o9--- ------- - "' ::: -
;:r--;7:--_;_-=): j;-i::----::":;-t.::e-:---*---_-_':::-:---|.'.:-:
-+'- "'-_------'o-,:-l-: --: -'
-__-- ---;- -- -'-"o,,.-- - - - - - -,.-
;|;:r*-i.:t:i:::;i*:::;*2..-t::-_z:.*-._::::.::.::.
.-..g..:;--_J-o..:-o-.;..........%:-----.-&--
;.---:-- ----------''" .:-'-- ---"'
"
-: ,. o -.' z'
\ l--,i-- ---- - ---'-__-..'t ..-1 ---
:-t-,
;5: ; -i: Z : -: j.-";*1;ii. . :-T
,1 f-:-: :' -"
-'--' -.---:ft*-----_p__l_$:
._\
----
i--i,.__
Ot
-r-
a -."!;-.--i'-
,-'J", "'
.--f'
--i -'
-*'o,_!---4
!.FN l'"''l'
i::J-,
-- --- -o9---"'---..
t',-A- --' -^'-t-- - -----ii-
#;:=t{L
g-"'-..'"6----
g -n" --1v---.
',..'&*''-l--
\\ \,'altf -- --
- -_-;.----- --
-7
\
.(
i
,YitsTtNq 63'frOs
,y
Lf rN6lJsp
6(k0E
joutil E:LeY47764
Lt =1 =r
. r -.rart
o
ILEU
'79e1b1 ' A 141'-t ffi
_%vle
l'.Ht'^-'.,r r.s fo[*' o, n*rl *!: i'. . {
FqsT
ELEYhtlorl
,t'- l1 l,' ): r,--1.. ,:'-
l --1 r f,lrr'' '- | ,,*L"
[,/ , ,'v'r k?- -
O B^., r i"b*
sL',, Mnt
2.t.:..4',,4
;;-1zLtr".r i7-<-
n+l A * ,'.t
-(/'\1tl[f!
k..*h: fL"
tt-11,+ luL{*"a
C//-,; /** L,',t a
'6ru A-r* H
'-ot^-.\ f1'z< .A or-
P-) "-d '&////1 rLur:atg
a4.GrL,J 6,-
(4,,3 /, :_,t
/it ' ,^ n-, 1 ,.,11 .I^r1,.+r.; t
.t4/'( tr a ;{ tc Ltl,.,.t,2.<
i":,:l$i!i-,= .
t
,4.' rh f>s,s * (/o,L.
--/\-/'/7zor, ; 1fu1ful 5 {-r-./-aap( U)Pe-<
Uti c {^t}e rot ot)t-t J- r)J ,
?p {LgonJs -Je *t< 4. ry/rJ (/*,-ron.e e,D
.. 7/a .Ct,t/ ilav*t ) Z Jo ns-J abd=-/ Tz 74
.. (/,4-rrrorz C4 lF C.o-,Je4/ -
4'*"
b+ t s/Nl 9
*"!g 4?nd//
Adjacent Property Owners :
Vall InternountaLn Sub.
P.O. Box 705
Vail, Co. 81658
Ms Joan K. Eggerlchs
200 Margate
Lake Bluff, IL 50044
Mr Danl,eL J. Frederick
P.O. Box 2561
Avon, CO 81620
Davld A. & Judith A. Maurer
736 Kiwt Circle
Wlnter Park, FL 32789
Mr. Levls W. Pennock
P.O. Box 1166
Vall-, CO 81658
l3J'
t o GIV
PUBLTC NorrcE t EN that the Planning and Fnvironmental
4.
NOTICE IS HEREBY
Cornrnission of the Town of vail witl hold a public hearing in
accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the municipal code of the
Town of Vail on August 13, 1990 at 2:OO P.!t. in the Town of Vail
Municipal Building. Consideration of:
1. A rrork session on air guallty.
2. A request for a conditional use pernit, a landscape
variance, and a setback varl.ance for a renediation system
equipnent building at the Alplne Standard Station' part of
Lot A, Vail village 2nd Filing, 285 S. Frontage Road West.
Applicant: Amoco corp.
3. A request for a najor anendnent to SDD No.
16, part of parcel A, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing 2. (The
Valley Phase III)Applicant: Brad & Susan Tjossem
A request for a rnajor subdivision, to approve the
preliminary plan, a reguest for a variance to the maximum
height for retaining walls, and a request for a variance to
the naximum percent grade for a road, on a Parcel comnonly
referred to as Spraddle creek' an approxinate 40 acre parcel
located north and east of the Main Vail I-70 interchange and
east of the Spraddle Creek livery. Commencing at the
Northeast Corner of the Southeast L/4 of the Southwest L,/4
of Section 5, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the 6th
Principal Meridian, being an Eagle county Brass cap properly
marked and set, htith all bearings contained herein being
relative to a bearing of s O0 11r 00rr E between the
Northeast Corner of said Southeast L/4 of the Southwest L/4'
and the Southeast Corner of said Souttreast L/4 of tlre
Southwest L/4 being an Eagle County Brass cap properly
rnarked and set; said Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4
of the Southwest L/4 being the Point of beginning; thence S
oo 11 | OOtt E along the east line of said Southeast L/4 of
the Southwest L/4 of Section 5 a distance of 1.320.14 feet to
the Southeast Corner the said Southeast L/4 of the Southwest
L/4 of Section 5i thence S 89 47' 48rr lt along the south line
of said Southeast I/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5 a
^Q$stance of 901.00 feett thence N 73 48t 32tt W along
-\ilhterstate 70 Right of Way line a distance of 2L4.12 feett
i thence N 66 52r 12n W along said Right of Way line a
distance of 24I. 10 feet to a point on the west line of said
Southeast L/4 af the South'test L/4 of Section 5t thence N OO
2of 31rr W along the west line of said Southeast L/4 of t}re
Southwest L/4 of Section 5 a distance of 1151.66 feet to the
Northwest corner of the Southeast L/4 of the Southwest L/4
of Section 5 being an Eagle county brass cap ProPerly narked
and set; thence N 89 41t L2't E along the north line of said
Southeast L/4 of the Southwest 1rl4 of Section 5 a distance
of 1331.07 feet to the Point of Beginning. Said real
property containinlt 39.55 acres, more or ]ess.
Applicant: George Gillett, Jr.
s*
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
:",::;#' lni"l o l",llii'
setback at 9 VaiI Road--Holiday House, Lot B, Vail Village^''2nd Filing.Applicant: Holiday House/Pinnacle Resorts
A request for a major amendnent to SDD No. 4,
Coldstream Condominiuns in order to amend sections 18.45.090
(B) density, 18.45.100 (B) floor area' 18.46.220 enployee
housing and 18.46.23o tinre requirements to convert an
existing racquetball facility into an eraployee housing unit,
management office, laundry and owner storage area at Lot 53
Glen Lyon Subdivision, 1476 westhaven Drive.
Applicant; Coldstrearn Condoniniurn Association.
A request for a setback variance in order to enlarge a
second story housekeeping service room at Montaneros
Condominiums located at 541 w. Lionshead Circle, I,ot 8,
Block 1, Vai}-Lionshead 3rd FiIing.
Applicant: Montaneros Condominiun Association
A reguest for a wall height variance and an amendment to the
approved access plan for both lots at 146 and L26 Forest
Road, Lots 5 and 6, Block 7, Vail Village lst Filing.
Applicant: Ron Byrne
A request for a height variance at 2855 Snowberry Drive, Lot
6, Block 9, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Doug and Michelle CahiII
10. A request for a height variance in order to erect a
satellite dish and a conditional use to expand hospital
space and add a satellite dish at the vail valley Medical
Center on Lots E and F, Vail Village 2nd Filing (181 west
Meadow Drive).Applicant: Vail valley Medical Center
11. A request for a side setback variance at Lot 3, Block 5 Vail
Village 1st Filing, Unit 3B--vail Rowhouses, 303 Gore creek
Drive.Applicant: Stewart Colton
L2. A request for an exterior alteration and a height variance
on Lot C and Lot D, and the southwesterly 4 feet of L.ot B,
all in Block 5-8, Vail ViIIage lst Filing, 227 BrLdge Street
(covered Bridge Building) .
Applicant: Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and Bruce Arun &
Associates.
The applications and inforrnation about the proposals are
available for public inspection in the Courmunity Development
Department office.
Town of Vail
Corununity Development
Published in the Vail
Department
Trail on July 27, 1990.
i:i :i c\-Itu
lli
:
r.l
;i I t ,i /Isf,-,t: t-z.-?D II. II lr Y
I
tl/1 J[-II , lpyUtrf ZttJa/4 -U
,
. l;L* L.,* *L'/H Arv .*4g -,:/L"
- -
-
/1 i / 'rtur J1v. "t 10 tttLt 1 P,)r' fL{* urwxt €++
r
0
@
A
I
,t
il ri
l'i
7./O .fu P/tnz eA fu *tc ,7a/z(azz a/r4 .
,tk Gc. Aar ,V /*;g nsVcchi
n ileed /o r?C:/era CoP! / //* ,shodrg /aca#dV 3/ 'rfrzrc/rt'ttt
an db ty,ttanrbtr hna. flou<zara*nj) o; 16. .ffi
-t ls so.rra/ sha<3 ltdg
shaax /oc. '/ bry ae lmryd at/
@ a?e dd4.u-*.
4eeaerhg fuza. ,6 apa.'n- e/era*oV / /zaz --ctccrdt
a//a'cail hgt (tt') . /d/o ncoo p/d/il Aa t€ no a'ay 9!
ckuqg
Errc zr,driafu h tyau/d /.?/z,t //a-^t r';ft/ ,b CDD
% 6-^u/atz 62ru*e)
?rs 9o o?/r/ry Cah// au)o(r /7€d 6 d/g'
,'V oK -h a)orz- m rc€/ 3{ azi€ &n,Ar,V
ra,,mu>@?frq - A( d/// //zg "Pg
ry/e fattrcact) . Ji.. fi ,4
,/ac. as hrriy' ol4r/*A
€qhur //ner .'-Ea,/r.r
lR.a\*.,,....,r.,*
'-J
et{\\f qlLc
" 28s
r^lrx\s : FE \>csrqr.rs
o qol
Snoc..*l k:.rs\ trB
\ t\"-.e '-
\
_- t SL trlrg $,
. 1*__=Ig_lolri H :t_!_L?6.
I
--.
.1114
I ', (Ljtr 4'-z-'\
qzt'4"
I
I
I
I
I
r-.J - -:
A FIESIEIEN
st Yallr Colorado
hard L. Crowther. FAIA afchtt€ct
'.. ^ -- t' iz<t--- -/'t '
:,1-3Ailr\i
'/qr' I or
L"v/f
REQUEST FOR HEIGHT VARIANCE
2855 Snowberry Drive
Vail, Colorado Vail Intermountain Subdivision
Block 9, Lot 6
Applicants, D. Douglas and Michelle J. Cahill' request a building
height variance to exceed the regulated 33 feet maximurn height for
a prirnary/secondary residence. The proposed variance in height is
to satisfy the Town of Vail (TOv) height measurement procedure.
The existing structure physically measures 32 feet 6 inches from
the highest ridge to the ground. This measurement wiII naturally
decrease upon placement of top soil and final landscaping.
Applicantsr house will not affect the view of existing or potential
structures in the vicinity in that the slope of the property is
greater than 4o* and places the ridge elevation below that of road
level on Snowberry Drive. The home on the adjacent lot has been
built in two stages on the slope of the hill, rising approxirnately
40 feet, with its ridge being a garage above street level .
The applicants believe there is a question as to whether the height
of the home is either 5.67 feet above the regulated 33 feet or 2.67
feet above regulation. The methodology with which the TOV
determines the highest point caused a physical hardship because of
the topographic condition of the applicants' site. This
methodology placed the highest point of the ridge over a drainage
ditch, which measured more than four feet below the natural grade
located at the exterior walls, directly below the highest point of
Page Two
the house. It was the applicants understanding that the highest
measurement was where the topographic contour intersected the
rniddle of the ridge and that this was a fixed point. This
understanding was based on the recoromendation rnade by the TOV
Planning staff assigned to the project at the tiure the project was
approved. Two procedures lrere recommended to lower the ridge
elevation and determine placement of the house. One was to drop
the finished floor elevation inside the foundation and the other
was to situate the house so that the deterrnined fixed point on the
ridge intersected a contour line to meet the understood height
requirement.
The placement of the horne was further deternined upon the beginning
of excavation and const4rction of the foundation. The applicant
found it necessary to change the placement of the home according
to the Design Guidelines 18.54.050 (A.2) of the Tov zoning codes,
atternpting to preserve unique land forms and features, in order to
save a 40 foot fir tree, Ieaving tbe root system in tact and
unharmed.
The applicants agree to the misunderstanding of the maximum height
of 33 feet, believing that it' \das 35 feet. Therefore, Ithen
deternining the highest point on the topographic site plan, the
measurement of 35 feet was used in caLculating placement. Thus
providing what the applicants believe is the 2-67 feet above
regulation.
Page Three
The requested variance does not affect light and air, distribution
of population, transportation, traffic facilities' utilities and/or
public safety.
The applicantsr farnily home neets alI Design Review Board
regulations, naintaining the natural beauty of the area with a
design that cornpliments both the individual site and its
surroundings. A urininal amount of trees were removed, Ieaving the
house surrounded by nany aspens. The driveway was brought in off
Snowberry Drive to eliminate street-side parking. conpatibility
of the project has and will be achieved through proper
consideration of scale, proportions, site planning, landscaping,
materials and colors.
Appl ication
PEC MEETING
,*
DATE
I.lnrs
wil I
A.
APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE
procedure is required for any project requesting a variance. The app'l ication
not be accepted until a'l 'l information is submitted.
NAME OF APPLICANT
ADDRESS
- lcrt I , (Lt l,tlsr< pnouEjth-s,L?7
NAME OF APPLICANT' S REPRESENTATIVE
ADDRESS
B.
NUNFA T S \
ADDRESS
PHONE
c. l'1,^.145 0F {type or orint)-llLrtte] bJ-C,k t!-
V r.t I (6 W.s V puow V|k's< 71
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
E. FEE $I OO PAID
THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE
YOUR PROPOSAL.
F. A list of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the subject property
INCLUDING PR0PERTY BEHIND AND ACR0SS STREETS, and their mailing addresses.
THI APPLiCANT t.lILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES.
II. A PRE.APPLICATION CONFERENCE l,lITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED
TO 'DETERMINE IF ANY'ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED. NO APPLICATION l.llLL 8E
ACCEPTED UNLESS IT IS COMPLETE (MUST INCLUDE ALL ITEMS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR). IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT
WITH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION l^lILL STREAIVILINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR
YOUR PROJECT SY OTCRMSING-THE NUI'IBER OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING
AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MAY STIPULATE. ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST 8E
COMPLIED l.lITH BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUm-.
rIr. F0uR (4) cOPrEs 0F THE F0LL0WrNG MUST BE SUBMTTTED:
A. A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THE VARIANCE REqUESTED AND THE
REGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEI.TENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS:
l. The rel ationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and structures in the vicinity.
noonrss J8Sf, Sruotr be rr[ )r,u
LEGAL DESCRIPTION L0T-L BL0CKj|__FIIING J,uIu,ryrtttt,r&etn
,^ \ lJ t vt
cK #_.if.tl_ raovludlilJh' Eou*, (nl'tu
COI4MUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I&II- RCCEPT
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or litera'l interpretation and
enforcement of a-specified regulatjon is.necessary to achieve compat'ibi'l ity
and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the
objectives of this title without grant of specia'l privilege.
3. The effect of the variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation, traffic facilities, utilities, and public safety.
IV.
B. A topographi.c and/or improvement surveJ at_a sca'le of at_least l" - 20, stamped ' by a Colorado.licensed surveyor including-locations of all.existing irp"oue-nents, including_grades and elevations. 0ther elements which must-be shown are_parking and-'loading areas, ingress and egress, landscpped areus ind-'--"'.utility and drainage features.
C. A slte plan at a scale of at least 1" = 20' showing exist'ing and proposed
bui 1di ngs.
D. All preliminary building elevations and floor p'lans sufficient to indicate the dimensions, general appearance, scale and use of all buildings and spaces existing and proposed.on the site.
E. A preliminary title report to verify ownership and easements
F. If the proposal is'located in a multi-family development which has a homeowners'association, then written approval from the association in support of the proiebt must be received by a duly authorized agent for said iisociation.
G. Any additional material necessar-v for the review of the app'l icaiion as determined by the zoning adminisirator..
* For interior modifications, an 'improvement survey and site plan may be
waived by the zoning administrator.
Time Requirments
The Planning and Environmental Commission meets of each month. A complete application form and
(as described above) must be submitted a minimum
PEC public hearing. No incomplete applications
administrator) will be accepted by the planning
nated subm'i tta'l date.
4. How your request complies with Vail's Comprehensjve Plan.
Vari ance
on the 2nd and 4th llondays all accompanying materiai
.of 4 weeks prior to the date of the
(as determined by the zoning
staff before or after the desig-
(,
[]l*,1::i::"',*-ol ,a.D' 1e-, et
THIS DEED , Ede this doy oI
KENNEIII W. !,lATIlIE:l^lS
ltay 25, L989
ot the coulty of
Cotorado, of the first part, ard
and State ot
qs OE
:E f.J z ltl zw mo {{Mtd
I lt ul -e H{r-
F, l
I' hJ ('ltt -l
m Dg oo r\me
r)\o@
z
<n,
nul
m
DANIEL MJGIAS CAIIIIL ald MICHELLE JAIIIREAU CA}IILL
dlose t.sst eddress is P.O. FX 1077, \AIL, CO 81658
of the Courty of and State ol Colo.€do, of the secord pert:
l,JIlllESSETH, Thet the ssid party ot the tirst part, for ard in cdr6ideretioo of the sun of
I\,lEIfY $UJSAIID mLIARS AI{D 00/1-00 rS--
and other good and veluabte considerstion to the said pe.ty of the fi.st p6rt in hEnd plid by the said pErti.s ot the
secord p6rt, the .eceipt rhereof ia he.eby coifessed aid ackno{ledged. hss grented, bErgein€d, sotd a.d conveyed, ard by
these presents does grant, ba.gain, sett, corw€y srd confirm unto the 6aid parties of the secord pErt, thei. heirs 6rd
assigns forever, not in tenEncy in cd||mn but in ioint tenancy, s(t the fot toring descri b€d tot or prrcet ot (srd,
lying ard being in the rt!t***** couty ol nAGLE 6rd Stste of Cotorsdo, to Hit:
I.Of 6, BIOCK 9, IL INIERI.4CIJNIAIN DEVEIOPME.IT SI,JBDTVISICII. AC@RDII.IG TO THE PIAT
BEgOBDEP SEPTE{BER, 7, T972 IN rcK 225 AT PAGE 335, CIIJNIY'OF EAGLE, STATE OF coroRAm-
rtso kiorr as st.eet nr.nb€r 2855 $ICfiEmRY LANE, VAfL. @LORAD
IOGEIHER eith atl 6td singuter the hereditslEnts and apgrrtensnces thcreto b.tongihg, or in.nyyis! app€rtaining, ard
the reYersiori 6nd reversions, aeftbi nder 6nd remainders, rents, issues rrd profits thereof; ard stt the astetc, right, tit(c interest, clsin ard demard dratsoeve. of the sEid psrty of the first psrt, either in tse or equity,of, in 6rd to the
ebove bsrgair€d premises, rith the hereditdments srd appurtemnces.
TO I1AVE AflD T0 HOLD the said prernises sbove bargained ard described, xith the appurtenances, unto the said p6rties of
the secord part, their heirs 6rd assigns forever. Ard the said party oI the ljrst part, for himsetf, his heirs, erecutors,
ard sdrinistrgtors, does covenant, grant, bergain and sgree to 6ri rith the srid psrties of the secord part, their heirs
atd assigns, thet 6t the time of the cnserting ard det ivery of these presents, he is eel.t seized ot the pr€rnisrs 6bove
conveyed, as of soo<i, sure, perfect, absol.ute ard indefeasible estate o{ inherit6nce. in la|., in tee simple, and hEs good right, lutt porer 6nd larful authority to gr€nt, bargain, sell 6rd convey the sa|tE in m6mer ond lorn ss atoreseid. 6nd
that the seme Ete tree 6nd clear trom 6ll former snd other grsnts, bergaihs, sates, liens, t6xes, asgessmntg snd
encu rrarEes of Hhatever kind or ndture soever-
E)(CEPT GM,IMAL TN(ES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR T}IE YEAR 1989 AND SIJBSEqJENT YEARS, AND s1lElEq p EAs4,!nrIs, RESffi/MroNs, RESrRrCrroNs, cpvm,nNrs AND ruc[rrs oF wAY, rN
DCTSTM{CE. TF A}IY.
{d the sboved bergained preiiises in the quiet srd peaceable possession of ssid partles of the second pert, th. survivor ot
them, their assigns snd the heirs and assigns of such survivo., sgainst Etl snd every person or persons (al|fulty ctaining
or to claim the Hhote or any part thereof, the seid party of the Jirst p6rt shatt snd ritt TJARRANT AIO fOREV€R DEtEilD. Ihe
singutar nLrr$er shatt inctude the pturEl, the pturet the singutor, erd the use of any gerder shalI be appticabte to att
:|Z,QQ . ...)-,
91,-.,1- t:-,.. iy
.ll
6'
o TI
(rl
a rrl so
ro
EO
'!rl
r.F
=
genoeis.
lN I.IITNESS IIHEREOF, the said party of the first p€rt ha6 hereunto set his hand and seal
rr i tten.
i$. L .t?4
\,\'i.f".!{^
day 6rd ye6r tirst ebove
(sEAL)sis"*I 11+AAibiel iverea ;n the presence or
-ti 4
.tA
4t t-
__l
"^h?i,"2\ryr1L !,",.
The toregoing i nstrun€nt Hss Ecknortedgd before fi€ this day of ttlay 26, a9a9
RH{NETII W. I4ATIHEIiS
ry conmissidr ",pi".. -J.)/f AA t-/4_ lb
torn 921A Co[.ioUTER HARRANTY oEED-To Joint Tenants
Escror # l-3402V Titte# L34O2
,19 L/7 .Vitness rry hrrd ord officlal. seat.
ii _;lri6
vn()L-
O
.;{{
t DtrPHRrMtrNT @F .tr@MMUNITV DtrVtrL@FMtrNT
XXXXXXX sALEs AcTroN FoRM
01 0000 41330 COM. DEV. APPUCA]ION FEES
1 0000 41540 ZONING AND ADDRESS MAPS
0000 424rs lroqp
0000 41412 lconrnecroRs ucENsEs fEEs
0t 0000 4r4r3 .SIGN APPLICATION
C' e,t', Lp-?L ce
11
a
t
APPLICATIOII DATE:
DATE OF DRB XEETIIiG, ,l-",rt: 'i', t /|ti -*.*
'":;
"'i ..-,\p-
..:_i.=
. .: :'!?,;;
INFORI'IATION IS SUBIIIfiED*ff*T
DRB APPLICATION
****.THI5 APPLICATION !tILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL
I. PRE-APPLICATI0N MEFIII'IG: '-T]
,'] : .'.;
A pre-aopi.ication meeting with'a planning'staff member is strongly suggested to :i'
.:E --.. -rr.:+.:^-,r iarnm-+i,.,- i.--^^,r-,r Na annlication will be acceoted :i ielermini if any addit'io;ai information is needed. No application will be accepted i]
unless it is comol.ete (must inciude aif iiemi-iequirea by the zoning adrninistrator). 't:i
ii it ttr" appiicant'i ieipons'ibility to make an appointment.with the staff to find It iS the appllCant'S feSpOnSlDl l'lfy EO maKe an aPPu rrrurrc L_ irr r.r. r..'|; Jss'' ev I rl
out about additionat submittat requiremenii. -iif"ul. note that a COMPLETE applica- f .-{i
;;;"-;iii;i;;;i;;; in. upp"ouui'p"o..ts for your Proiect bv -decreas'ins
the numoer -,.-, -.'aI '$s.oi londitions of approvat tirat the'oRB may st'iluiati. ALL conditions of approvai must ,fr:
bereso.lvedbef.ore.iuuiiatngperm.it.isissued.
A. PR0JECT DESCRIPTION: Itt.'-,- !'Lrv\'-Vt\LLtr)t''t\" a'/ :( l"-'r-uLi t'l't'qLt j::';F
OF PROPOSAL:B. LOCATION
Address
'^'/ ,^ ''t LL\-(
Legal Description Lot 'tr b B'lock
Zoni ng
C. NAI'IE OF APPLICANT:
Addres s
D. NAI'IE OF APPLICANT'S REPRESE}ITATIYE:
Addres s
E. NAI'IE OF
Fil ing V!..i Iit k v rvri,r.tr*,ri t!
tel ephone.
te i echone
-i
OlrlNERS:
Si gna ture
Address
F.
tel ePhone
be paid at the t'ime a building permit is requesied'DRB FEE: The fee will
VALUATION
0 - $ 10,000 $ 10.00
$ 25.00
d-50]jo''
$1oo . oo
$200.00
$300.00
$10.001 -$ 50,000 ffi
$5oo,oo1 - $1,000,000 $ over $1'ooo'0oo
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGAROING ALL SUBI'IISSIONS TO THE DRB:
1. In addition to meeting submittai requirements, the applicant must stake the site
to indicate property iines and building corners. Trees that rvill be rernoveo
shoujd also be martld. This work must be completed before the ORB visits the
. s'i te.
Z. The revi"" O"o..r, for NEl.l BUILDINGS will normallyjnvoive b^lo separate meetings
of the Design Rev'iew Board, so plan on at least tlo meetings for their.approval.
3. Peopie rvho fail to appear before the Des'ign Review Board at their scheduled
meei'ing and who have not asked for a postponement will be required to be
repubi ished.
a
....".'.{r?
4. The fol.lowing itens no 'longer have.to be. presenled,lg-!!. Design-Review Board' '" r-:
They, however, n;t; iq Ue iresenteO io in!-Zoning Administrator for approvai:
and similar exterior changes that do not aiter the
the building; and
a. llindows' skYIights
existing Plane of
b. Bui'lding additions that are not viewed
wnich hive had letters submitted from
the addition; and/or approvai from the
associ ati on .
You may be required to conduct Natural Hazard Studies on your
check with a Town Planner before prtceeding'
from any other lot or Public space'
adjo'in'ing property owners approvlng
alent f6r', or manager of a condominiurn
property. You should 5.
LIST OF IIATE.?.IALS
-..lrAl'lE 0F Pil0JECi:
. LEell DESGRIPTIoII:
;llEFT'+ffil'e;''
The follolving
Eoard before
A. EUILDI}IG
Roof
Siding
infornation is required for submittal
a finai approval can be fiven:
iIATERIALS: TYPE 0F I'IATERIAL
by the applicant tc the Design Review
COLOR
1
qQ3
rryu9al , 4.€. P. :Po-rt 'ilca,td^& &'u"^
a
;
i
Other'Jall Materials
Fasci a
Soff i ts
ili ndo"vs
lJindolv Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck
Fl ues
Rails
F'lashi ngs
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
0ther
PLANT I.IATERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
B. LANDSCAPING: Nane of Designer:
Phone:
Botanical Name Common Name Quani tv
EXISTING TREES TO
gE REIOVED
*Indicate caliper for deciducious trees'
Piru.-
Falcl.,'*.-.
t +
a a--
o 7'/
/6
I
/, /t/
'//
cohi fers .
. (over)
Indicate height for
PLAIIT IIATEi,IALS:
(con't)
SHRUES
EXIS;i;iG SIIRUBS
TO BE P.EI.IOVED
Quan i t'r Eotani ea I ilame Comon iiame
UKUUIU Ligr i.i.J
qnn
Tvoe
h4
Scuare Flotate
*__
I IT: UI
thlrtt^.-'.1rl lK|(lUi.1| I Url
TYPE OR. METHOD OF
EKUJ lUr{ LUli I KUL
"tfn-,t.ao!*
C. 0THER LANOSCAPE FEATURES (retaining wal'ls, fences, swimrning poois, etc.) P'lease specify.
ZOIIE CHECK
FOR
sFR, R, R P/S ZC:|E DIST,iiC;S
n^rr. /' l<lxg
==-ffi LEGiL i:3Ci'iir i rUi{: LoE-
AOORESS:
O:,JNER
ARCH I TECi
ZONE DISTRIC
PROPOSED USE
LOT sI;E
Pro oos ed
a* ss'
nab
tgah
J6+w
rcqo
-,
4tl - r&t
a'LltL) '
Slta
n(
Ac\
,\A._
u,L-.-
Slope Actua I Solo
Avalanche n4--
Flood Plain ^A-
Sl ope n fi-.
lletlands
^-o€Geologic Hazards A-A-
a(-
He'ignt
lOEa I ur(rA
PrimarY GRFA
SecondarY GRFA
Setbacks: Front
( i doc
Rear
l,later Ccurse
Site Coverage
Landscaoi ng
Fence/Retaining '/al i Heights
Parki ng
Credi',s: Garage
Mechani ca I
Ai rl ock
qf'tFrato
revr eJv
Solar Heat
Drive: SloPe Permi tted
Envi ronnrenta I /Hazards :
? o/o
Bl ock
one
Pho ne
20'
15'
(30)(5c)
( 300 ) (600 )
(eoo)(1200)
(so)(1oo)
frzf/\ru/
(2oo)(40o)
Filing lail lfuitrntt&"it'
Al'l o';ted
Comrnents:
approveo
t
UTILITT LOCATIC:: VEP.IFICATICI:
SUBD IVIS iON
JOB NA'IYE
nt nal. FT? Tr.n ]i It l,.r \,
AI)DRESS
The location of ucj.ll.cies, whecher chey be raain trunk lines or Proposed llnes n
Eusc be approved and veri-f ied by the f ollor.ring uEililies fo: che accompanying
site plan.
Auchor:reci Sisrature Date
Mouncain Bell
468-6500
Wescern Slope Gas Co.
I 800 923-1987
llarry ltoyes
Public Service Conpany
949-5781
Gary Hall
l{oly Cross Eleccirc Assoc.
949-5892
Ted li'rsky/Michael Laveri;r
lleri c:g e Cablevision T.V.
949-5530
Gary Johnson
Upper Eagle Valley Wacer &
SaniEacion Dis Erj-cE
47 6-7 480
Fred Haslee
NOTE: These verificacions do not relieve che conEraccor of his responsj.bill.ty
co obcain a screeE cuc per:nir fron che Toqrn of Vall, Degartnenc of Publlc
lJorks and co obcai.n uEiliry locar:ons before digging in any public right-
of-way or easenenc i.n che Tosn of Vai.l. A builCine oerrni.c is noc a stleeE
cuc DermiE. A screec cuc pernic nust be
Thl.s fortl ls to verify servlce availability ard locarlon.
this should be used in conjunctlon with prepari-ng your
utlllly plan atrd scheduling inscallacions.
a'
*(Please bring a slte plan when obcalning Upper Eagle Valley Wacer
& Sanj.E.acfon signacures )
;(
UTILITY LOCATION VERIFICATION
SUBDIVISION i rticl. nraquTdr rJ
JOB NAHE
uciliEles, whelher they be nain
and verified by the follor.ring
trunk lines or proposed llnes,
utilitles for the accourPanYlng
MounEain Bell)D L''eas'
Date
6->--Z
6-a€r
6-=-17
L-a'9?
Y'tr,-n\ f[.clCn
NOTE: These verifLcacions do no! relieve rhe concraccor of his responsibiliEy
to obtain a streec cuc permlc frost the Town of Val1, Departmenc of Public
Works and co obcain uciliEy locacions before digging in any publlc righr-
of-vay or easemenE in the Tosrn of Vai1. A building pernit is noE a street
cuc perrnic. A scree! cut perni! urus ! be obcained separalely.
This forn 1s to vertfy servlce avaiLability and locatlon.
This shculd be used in conjunc!1on wich preparing your
utillty plan and schedullng installaclons.
,
*(Please bring a s1t'e plan shen obcaLning Upper Eagle Valley Wacer
& Sanitaglon slgnacures)
"o,
* 6 BlocK-Z-rruuc t At- Iprcrtnlau"t'iAtlJ
The location of
must be approved
site plan.
Authorized S lsnature
-AM5{0 c,a1-{,tgb
Western Slope Gas Co.
r 800 922-1987
Harry ltoyes
Public Service ConpanY
949-5 781
Gary Hall
- lloly Cross Electirc Assoc.'v/ 949-5892
{/ Ted Husky/Michael Laverty
Ileri cage Cablevision T.V.
949 -5 5 30
..? Garf JoUrtson t" siwL- fl:t )1'
Upper Eagle Valley Water &
..,1 Sanication Dis tric!
1fr 476-7480
Fred Haslee
-ffi;+on
L/Jt. t-.zsl
, I::#.1:l record the-daY orf-'A'D' 1e-'a'",*t RECORDER.
DEPUTY,
THf S DEED . Made thi s day of
betxeen
KENNEIH W. MAHHEI.JS
Yray 26, 1'989
of the Courty of and Stste of
colorado, of the first part, artd
DqNIH, MJGINS CAHILL AId MICIIEJLE JA}IDREAU CAI{ILL
lirose [€gat address is P.O. mX LO77 , VAILT CO 81658
of the cohty of ard state of Colorado, of the second part:
UITIIESSETII. That the said party of the first part, for ard in consideration of the slm of
Form 9214 CON.IPUTER T.,ARRANTY DEED.To Joint Tenants
ard other good ard vatuabte consideration to the said p€rty of the first part in hard paid by the said parties of the
secoid part. the receipt rhereof is hereby ccrfessed ard ac knol t edged, has gront€d, bargaircd. sotd ard conveyed, and by
thesc presents does gr8nt, bargain, sell, corvey ard confirm unto the said parties of the second p.rt, their heirs and
assigns forever, not in tenancy in ccn|tron hJt in joint ten€ncy, att the fottoHing d€scriH tot or parcet of tard,
lying and being in 16s **Jr**** Coutty of EAGLE end Stste of Colorado, to r{it:
I'T 6, BTOCK 9, \'AIL INIB$dCTJNIAIN DE!I|7E[OF!48{I SIJBDIIIISIOI, AC@RDI}G TO TTE PIjIT
RE@RDED SEPIE[tffi. 7, L972 II.I rcOK 225 NE PAffi 335, ffi,JNrY OF EAGrl, SrAIE OF
@IORAM.
llso kmrn as €tr€et nuber 2855 SllCpilBffiRlf IANE, \AIL' @IORAD
IoGETHER rlith atl ard singutar the hereditanEnts and apFJrtenanccs thereto betonging, or in anpri se appertaining, ard
the rcversion and revtrsions, rerninder and remainders, rents, issues ard profits thereof; ard atl the rstste, right, titte
intercst, ctairn ard defl|ard *ratsoever of thc said party of the first part, either in lar or eq.ri ty,of , in.rd to the
rbove brrgr i ncd prmise6, rith thr hereditalEnts rnd appurtenances,
fO { VE AilD lo HoLD the said prenises above bargei ncd rrd describcd. rith the appurt.narres, unto the said parties ol
the secord p8rt, their heirs ard assigns forwer. Ard the Baid psrty of the first part, for hinself. his hcirs, executors,
and ldninistrators, does covenant, grsnt, bargsin and agree to ard rith the said parties of the second part, their heirs
'rd assigns, that !t the tine of the enseat irg lrd det ivary of these pfesents, he is retl seized of thc premises abo\€
convcyed, ss of gpod, Bure, perfect, absotute rnd indefessibte .state ot ir*reritrrc, in lar, in fee sinple, ard has good
right, futt pot er lnd trxfut ruthori ty to grdrt. b6rgsin, setl ard cdrvly the sam in marncr ard fonn as aforesaid, and
that tha ga|||e are free ard ctear frcnr cll lomrer lnd othcr grents, bsrgains, sates, liena, tsxes, assee$rnta and
acurbrences of lftatever kird or natufe soever,
EI(CEPT GNERAL TAJ{ES AI{D A.SSESSMENIS TDR IIIE V'EAR 1989 AIID SIIJBSUJBII Y:EARS, A}.TD s'tBlET 10 EASMINTS, RESR1A(nIONS, RESTRICrfONS, @\lEldANIS A}rD RrG[ilS OF l,iAY, IN
ECISTBiICE, IF AI{Y.
and the aboved bargained premises in the quiet ard pesceabte possession of said Farties of the second part,-the survivor of
thenr their assigng and the heirs and assigns of such survivor, agsinst alt sd every p€fson of persms laHfulty ctaiming
or to claim the *rote or any part thereof, the said pafty of the fifst part shatt and Hitt I|ARRANT AIO FoREVER DEFEiID, The
singular nu$er shatt inctude the plurat. the ptural the singular, ard the use of any gerdec shatt be appticabte to att
genders.
lll VIIIIESS IIHEREOF, the said party of the first part has hereunto set his hard ard seal
rri tten.
day and year first sbove
(sEAr )
(SEAL)
(SEAL )
The fofegoir€ instrunent ras acknoytedged before ne this day of
KH.INHIH W. IiGrIHEI{IS
Yby 26, L989
IIIENIY IlUtSAl{D DIiIARS Al.lD OOI1OO|S----- DoLLARS,
rf' confissidr '*'"" 1?'U-Lt-lL- 2u
w
Escror # L34O2V ritre# L3402
,n'// -uitrcss rry hand end official seat-
\
:
I I{TEP.- DTPARTI'IENTAL REV I El,l
PP.0JECT: Gtrr-r-- l*,Or*-..;:-
DATE SUBI.|ITTEI): E -?.1 . DATE 0F PUBLIC HEARING 1.5--x-
COI!'/TENTS }|EEI)ED BY:t)W- P@*ts-
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
a
-
.fler I tT ,r.-rl tul:o;fzral(l-.}'-)F't' , ,,...J
R,
zoliE ct:Icl{
for
R P/s z0;{[D]STI?ICTS SFR,
Lega'l Description : Lot 6 B'f ock 3_ Fi'tin9
$ner LE{4)Architect
-:>
'/4tL /A1TVZ1gILEA/
zc;le ursLri ct Proposed Use <i /:a
Setbacl'.s:
Sides-Requir-cd 15, proposed
Rear -RequireC 15' proposed ({
liatcrcrulsc-requ'i red 'proposed -l---
t ,.^ t -,'.'GRFA:
GRFA:
/rl'lor.;ed i *1 5-
' Pri nir ry
Secondary
Propo: ed
Propcs ed
Prop cs e d
Propos ed
Proposcd
Prop:;: erd
Actual
.Prinaq, A1 I ol.;ed
Secondary /rl'l ol;ed
Site Cor,era ge: Al'loi.red
Landscapi'ng:Requi red
Itrite: Sl ope permitted
En'.'ironn;cntal,/ll,:;.lrrJs: Aya'l.nche
2?uj
Reqrrired #"Park i ng :
e al
-SlLope
Fl ood Pl a in
flt li'It t{Ot .xflr rrlltrf,Olllltlltrlt tlCa lllt orrfr elr. GICF G ll-E l-
lrdl'!3E.ILE
r al l |l n:r illlrllr
illt rb tt'lf u||llt tlllt lfFlulfirr ||nt&l! llttll. a
efrrU'.f cFtl- .a n |la d Obr*r at l|FI Jtr || I
bre' r..+ rblL blr* llttl, htl7 €r d rr5 t. tb llr
-r - Aa Hclf ;ltrr
-
rel -eddr lt !r |t Irf to Hl
brfrr htL btrcrl+ t$r *n clrrb I t l- .td dlrt
rI-attll-rt}.rltr
tF - il!lElt drar -Fr..rr d
w
tuil r srtrr t
ailltt tlE[|
lLl
ls t
lIC lda-l-
t-r-'I
3 "!It d-l- 4ltta;at - . .(.. ,'
i'..i !.
t"
tb ll|rfti I le Ett t Lt ar .xali b *tr- l. .Clf- brrer d t ...!fila btdr b flr
It&or€o
t lttt< It' . 11i1.
rrrt a[t !zu! Gtl.|flll tll'lE G
t;.trnp3 r Ftltsl 166 eLrt
ltllt. l'(
nilli ,r^'-^ d ot?tctrl nl.
a
:f
P.O. Box 1077 Vail, Colorado 81658
October 20, L989
To Whom It May Concern:
I an, building a single family residence in Vail InLer-mountain, Block 9, Lot 6. Due to the excessive slope of the lot, I am proposing to build a garage which will
encroach on the utility easement.
The Town of Vail will staff approve the building with your
acknowledgement of the structure being placed onto the
easement.
Sincerely.
.\.\/U- l)llrt-oto\ (4t1vL, '
D. Douglas Cahill
Company
w;Jt, q,/E-t67t - (o)1
furu t *l - v?tu'ssv7 w)
\
o
--4,Date / /
J
P.O. Box 1077 .Vail, Colorado 81658 October 20, 1989
To Whom It May Concern:
f arn building a single family residence in Vail Inter-mountain, Block 9, Lot 6. Due to the excessive slope of the lot, f am proposing io build a garage which tri1l encroach on the utility easement.
The Town of Vail will staff approve the building with your
acknowledgement of the structure being placed onto the easement.
Sincerely,
r\?\r'U- l/o,^ 6' {-/+S Q,4slau-
D. Douglas Cahill
//-< // /(s/
Company
P.O. Box 1077 VaiI, Colorado 81558
October 20, 1989
To Whom It May Concern:
I am builoing a singie family resicierice in Vail_ fn+..er-mountaj-n, Block 9, Lot 6. Due to the excessive slope of the lot, I am proposing to buj-ld a garage whi.ch wj_Il encroach on the utility easement.
The Town of Vail will staff approve the building with your
acknohiledgement of the structure being placed onto the
easemenE.
Sincerely,
D- D-'-..r,a. Cal,-.-,
///-/E2tt&-E l:AB \E rr^-- - - ..\. \Jlr(P Cr r, ! y
/o - 23- E1
Date
D. Doqg1a..q CehilI
edged By
P.O. Box 1077 Vail, Colorado 81658
October 20, 1989
To Whorn f t l[ay Concern:
I am building a single family residence in Vail Inter-mountain, Block 9, Lot 6. Due to the excessive slope of the lot, f am proposing to build a garage which wiII
encroach on the utility easement.
The Town of Vail will staff approve the building with your
acknowledgement of the structure being placed onto the
easement..
Sincerely,
n\/
D- !}-'.-e,i,X (Apl ta--'---
D. Douglas Cahi1l
Acknowledge
Date
LUPV,
7c1b7' 61
" l,Q b'- lt1
:V7rzs
h l eo''e t'
'
Y- t-tAlil tJ
| ,.g*...,01
It at/,,4
.L'.
Iq55.l-l
A-q;r tr
r_.;.i',
iil::.::
:ltl.*
i:
,_1 r
I
I
I
:
Dt*NArg trvrt$ (9rr"D€.n{FrBAo$u
Tll€ R\DG& e
J r
I jr
7c1b7,67
ErfA.{- FVIJ?'Hrr-1Hff
$ffi'7e'
,_--'l.--1._
I .l
I
,r"'AS , ^)g,.i5*b*
lD --a
U =t t:\ r \ -t/\.\ r
I L.-r- 1: . 'i
lt-l{r r'- In
WOODS and HYMAN
ATTO9N=YS A] LAW
co.oeADa ct ue ButLotNG, sur't E 6t6
4I5 5 EAST JEWELL AVENUE
DENV€R, C O LOFAO O 8O22a
{3O3 75 9. es?O
Ar-! N rr/ooos, Pc,
JI'FREY A, HY MAN
eARC Fl M!5Hr(rtr
Mr. Jim Sayre
Town Planner
Departnrent of Cor,r;nuni ty Development
Tou'n of Var 1
Box 100
Vai1, CO 81657
Re: Loren Leech vs
Dear Jim:
Decernber 20, 1982
Timberland Homes, et aI
I greatly appreciate the time you spent with me last Friday, DecenJter 17, 1982, i-n connection with the proposed construction of a Timberl,and Home on Mr. Leech's 1ot in West Vail-. You indicated that you wanted to again review the material to refresh your recol-l-ection as lo the basi-s for your letter of July 27, 1982, indicating that "the staff cannot schedule the project for revi.ew by Design Review Board or i-ssue a building permit.',
r 1ef ''- with you the original plans prepared by Ti-mberland Homes, the revised p1ans, the site plan drawn by engineers at lvlr. Leech's request, and the "Answer Guide" furnished bv Timberland Homes. rn addition, r left with vou samples of the wood used jn construction, Jncluding the wood sample which was designated to be used on the lower walls-
vrhen you have finished with your review, I wourd appreciate your gi-ving me a call and we can biscuss it over the pntne or I can make another trip there to your office. fn lny event, I will need to pick up the docuinents and ma-"erials which r left with you. please preserve them carefuLlv as they may be exhibits in the pendrng lawsuit between tire parti-es, should the matter proceed to .uhat point. /)
- t /,,t Siicerelv.t/ / /-'.-"':+'+'I ''/ 1/t r7 .! /. .i ,'-"-1 it 'Lt'u"t" " v
pjr a,zAlan woods
xc: Mr. Loren G. Leech