HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 6 BLOCK 2 LOT 6 LEGAL.pdft tY!,r:"fu'
Project Name: CADOUCOLMAR WALL DRB Numberi DR8050114
Project Descriptionl
Replace existing timber retaining wall with stone-clad block wall in exact location as existing;
stone type is Gallegos #31, Ashland Rubble Smear
Participants:
owNER CADOL, ROGER V. & SALLY M. 03/2512005
9850 E PROGRESS CIR
GREENWOOD VILLAGE
co 80111
APPLICANT CADOL, ROGER V. & SALLY M. 03/2512005
9850 E PROGRESS CIR
GREENWOOD VILLAGE
co 80111
OWNER COLMAR LLC
251 FOWLER RD
FAR HILLS
NJ 07931
Project Address: 725 FOREST RD VAIL Location: 725 FOREST ROAD
Legal Description: Lot:5 Block:2 Subdivision: VAILVILLAGE FILING 5
Parcel Number: 2101-072-1001-0
2101-072-1001-1
Comments: see conditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Action: APPROVED
Second By:
Vote: DateofApprovaE 04l2Ol20OS
Conditions:
Cond: 8
(Pt AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
or
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced
and is diligently pursued toward completion.
Cond: CON0007041
The applicant shall ensure that, at the finish of construction, the wall does not
exceed four feet (4') in height at any location, regardless of its current height.. ., Entry: O4l2Ol2O05 Byl. ee Action: AP
Cond: CON0007042
The applicant shall ensure that the wall is constructed no closer to the edge of
asphalt (Forest Road) than five feet (5').
Entryt 0412012005 By: ee Action: AP
Planner: Elisabeth Eckel DRB Fee Paid: 320.00
Project Name: CADOUCOLMAR WALL DRB Number: DR8050114
Project Description:
Replace existing timber retaining wall with stone-clad block wall in exact location as existing;
stone type is Gallegos #31, Ashland Rubble Smear
Participants:
owNER CADOL, ROGER V. & SALLY M. 03/2512005
9B5O E PROGRESS CIR
GREENWOOD VILLAGE
co 80111
APPUCANT CADOL, ROGER V. & SALLY M, 03/25/2005
9B5O E PROGRESS CIR
GREENWOOD VILLAGE
co 80111
OWNER COLMAR LLC
251 FOWLER RD
FAR HILLS
NJ 07931
ProjectAddress: 725 FOREST RD VAIL Location: 725 FOREST ROAD
Legal Description: Lot: 6 Block: 2 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 6
ParcelNumber: 2101-072-1001-0
2101-072-1001-1
Comments: see conditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Action: APPROVED
Second By:Vote! Date ofApprovalz 0412012005
Conditions:
Cond:8
(PLAN)t No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PI-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
a o
of final apprcn/al, unless a building permit is issued and
and is diligently pursued toward completion.
Cond: CON0007041
The applicant shall ensure that, at the finish of construction, the wall does not
exceed four feet (4') in height at any location, regardless of its current height.
Entry; 0412412005 By: ee Action: AP
Cond: CON0007042 )
The applicant shall ensure that the wall is constructed no closer to the edge of
asphalt (Forest Road) than five feet (5').
Entryt 0412012005 By: ee Action: AP
Planner: ElisabethEckei DRB Fee Paidr $20.00
I
construction is commenced
ffit#i:::t,*Htrlift?:ffi" :, ,. i
I0l4rybFmlP "'iii:ii;:$x:5$?";,x?'!ili'i3do48'6s7i id,,ii: 7', i
web: www.vailgov.com
Generallnformation: *-l-ir:,::r,,..' I -,:: _ j
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please
refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The
project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within
one year of the approval,
Location ofthe Proposal: Lot:Block:
a-a'
&L
Physical Address:(
parcef No.: 2lot o7&/.0o /0 7 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
Zoning:
Name(s) or o*n"<#!11 'n DoL
/o"^
7 tsl
\./
-.
--J-
ffiL)a ,,___o
\I
-\
-C,
Mailing Address;
5o x.9st 2
'{on,{ rwa
Owner(s) Signature(s):
:, (-'
Name of Applicant:
Mailing Address:R:ttl
u-eae]
E-mail Address:
Type of Review and Fbe:
tr Signs
E Conceptual Review
E New Construction ! Addition
I Minor Alteration
(multi-family/commercial)
6 Minor Alteration
(single-family/duplex)
fl Changes to Approved Plans
tr Separation Request
Fax: 3oJ_0 56t 476- /6t14
ql\ z7) - 77; ' ,got
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.
No Fee
$650 Construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.
$300 . An addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
$250 Minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
re-roofing, painting, window addjJions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 Minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 Revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design
Review Board.
No Fee
For Office Use Only: h
Fee Paid: Zb Check No.: F By:
1- uo'cl s-
"/A''\-'
+t*f******+*****i++t************++**+++*++*1.+***********t*t**********************++*********
TOWNOFVAIL. COLORADO Statement *******++**********'**'***||+ll************+*********laa****************++*++f+t************{.*t
St,atement Nr:mber: R050000288 Amount: $20.00 03/25/200509227 Alt!
Pa)ment Method: Cash Init : iIS
Notation: $/COLI'{AR
Permit, No3
Parcel No:
Site Addresa :
Location:
Thia Payment:
DRB050114 Type: DRB-Minor Al-t, SFR/DUP
210107210010
725 FOREST RD VAII,
725 FOREST ROAD
Total Fee6:
$20 - oo Total AI-,L Pmts :
Balance:
$20.00
$20.00
$0.00 +*+********+++++++*********+*****t*t*+*++++****f,**********t*++++*+**************++*it*++*+++
ACCOIJNT ITEM LIST:
Accorint Code DescriDtion Current Pmt,a
DR 00100003 rr2200 DES TGN REVIEW FEES 20.00
Gallegos Corporation Page I of I
1t,i I afi{er- -'ir. lrrli :lrft lPt fii'
tlrt lt'nff 'rrlt'1'tf}I,t!'r ffiH ffiE ffiH ME
==
more selections
<< < r234567 > >>
Floor Panel Selections t2
oowntoaa ftS file of all stone selectlons
#31 ASHLAND RUBBLE SMEAR
http ://www. gallegoscorp. com/stonesales/stonesales4.htnl 3n6t2005
:,' a I
7 \
knd Title
OU RANTET, COMPANY
Date: 03-17-2005
Property Address:
CUSTOMER DISTRIBUTION
OurOrderNumber: 254205
SS&F/VARE
230 BRIDGB ST.
VAIL, CO 81657
Attn: GOR-DON ADGETT
Phone: 97O-47 6-2421
SS&F/VARE
183 GORE CREEK DRIVB
VAIL, CO 81657
Attn: CARROLL TYLER
Ptwne: 970-479-2V2O
If you have any inquiries or require fufther assistance, please contact one of the numben below:
108 s. TR.ONTAGE RD. W. n03
P.O. BOX357
VAIL, CO 81657
Phone:
Furz 970-476-4534
108 S. TRONTAGE RD. W, NO3
P.O. BOX 357
VAIL, CO 81657
Phone:
Fax: 970 41G4534
EMail: mmoss@ltgc.com
-v\Lano tue
GUARANTET, COIIP NI
Property Address:
Buyer/Borrower:
COLMAR, A NEW JERSBY GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
Seller/Owner:
CLINTON G. AMES, JR, AND DORIS M. AMES
Date: 03-17-2005
Our Order Number: 254205
Need a map or directions for your upcoming closing? Check out Land Title's web site at www.ltgc.com for directions to any of our 54 officd locatio-ns. '
ESTMATE OF TITLE FEES
AltaownersPolicy 10-17-92 gt,g4S.OO
If L.aa Tltl. du.trtt.. crytI,y r!71 bc a\o.!tE th!. tr.^.rctlot, .bova f... a!7! b. aolt.at d .c tirt cft..
TOTAL ;t,s4s.oo
tolr covtrct 06/0a THANK YOU TOR, YOI,]R ORDERI
o a
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule A
Our Order No. 254205
Cust. Ref.:
hoperty Address:
1. Effective Date: hlJry 29,1996 at 5:00 P.M.
2. Policy to be Issued, and Proposed Insured:
"ALTA" Owner's Policy 10-17-92 $888,500.00
Proposed Insured:
COLMAR, A NEW JERSEY GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered hereln ls:
A Fee Simple
4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in:
CLINTON G. AMES, JR, AND DORIS M. AMES
5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
PARCEL B AND PARCEL D, TOGETHER WITH AN UNDIVIDED ONE-HALF (1/2) INTEREST IN AND
TO PARCELS EAND F, A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 6, BLOCK 2,YAIL VILLAGE, SIXTH
FILING, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1985 IN BOOK 426 AT PAGE
242, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO.
t o
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-l
(Requirements) Our Order No. 254205
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be
insured.
Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to-wit:
1. EVIDENCE SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY TTIAT THE TERMS. CONDITIONS AND
PROVISIONS OF THE TOWN OF VAIL TRANSFER TAX HAVE BEEN SATISFIED.
2. WARRANTY DEED FROM CLINTON G. AMES, JR. AND DORIS M. AMES TO COLMAR. A NEW
JERSEY GENERAL PARTNBRSHIP CONVEYING SUBJECT PROPERTY.
o I
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-2
@xceptions)Our Order No. 254205
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satlsfaction of the Company:
I . Rights of claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and
inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not showr by the public records.
4 ' Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and
not shown by the public records.
5. Defects, liens encumbrances, adverse claims or other nutters, ifany, created, first appearing in the public records or
attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for
value the estate or i erest or mortgage thereon covered by this Conrmitment.
6. Taxes and assessments trot yet due or payable and special assessments not yet certified to the Treasurer's office.
7. Any unpaid taxes or assessments agairst said land.
8. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any.
9. 1996 TAXESNOT YET DUEORPAYABLEANDASSESSMENTSNOT YET CERTIFIED TO THE
TREASURERS OFFICE.
IO, LIENS FOR UNPAID WATERAND SEWER CHARGES. IF ANY.
I I. RIGHT OF PROPRIBTOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE
THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES
AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 04, 1923,IN BOOK
93 AT PAGB 98.
12. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE
UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 04.
1923, IN BOOK 93 AT PAGE 98.
13. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER
CLAUSE, BUT OMITTINGRESTRICTIONS, IFANY, BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,
OR NATIONAL ORIGIN, AS @NTAINED IN INSTRI]MENT RECORDED AUGUST IO,1962,
IN BOOK 174 AT PAGE I79 AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 05,
1964, IN BOOK I83 AT PAGE I AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 14.
1964, IN BOOK I83 AT PAGE I4I.
o I
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-2
@xceptions) Our Order No. 254205
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
14. BASEMENT AS CONVEYED TO VAIL WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT IN INSTRUMENT
RBCORDED OCTOBBR 10, 1966 IN BOOK 2OO AT PAGE 223.
15. EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THE
RESUBDIVISION PLAT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1985 IN BOOK 426 AT PAGE242.
INCLUDINGBUT NOT LIMITED TO:.
FOR ZONING PURPOSES, THE SIX PARCELS CREATED BY THIS SUBDIVISION ARE TO BE
TREATED AS ONE ENTITY WITH NO MORE THAN ONE TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE ALLOWED
ON THE COMBINES AREA OF THE SIX PARCELS. ALLOWABLE GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR
AREA FOR THE TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE WILL BE CALCULATED BASED ON THE COMBINED
AREA OF THE SIX PARCELS.
16. TERMS, CONDITIONSAND PROVISIONS OF PARTYWALLAGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF
COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESERVATIONS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27. 1985 IN
BOOK 426 AT PAGE 24I.
17. EASEMENT l0 FEET IN WTDTH AI-.rONc THE NORTHERLY LOT LINE OF SUBJECT pROpERTy
AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1985 IN BOOK 426 AT PAGE242,
18. ENCROACHMENT OF DECK ONTO PARCEL B AS SHOWN ON IMPROVEMENT LOCATION
CERTIFICATE NO. 240 BY EAGLE VALLEY ENGINEERING & SURVEYING. INC.
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY
COLMAR, A NEW JERSEY GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
25I FOWLERRD.
FAR HILLS. NJ 0793I
DEAR CUSTOMER:
o o
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-2
@xceptions) Our Order No. 254205
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satlsfaction of the Company:
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY IS PLEASED TO PROVIDE YOU WITH YOUR OWNER'S
TITLE INSURANCE POLICY. THIS VALUABLE DOCUMENT INSURES GOOD AND MARKETABLE
TITLE TO YOUR PROPERTY. PLEASE RAVIBW THE POLICY IN ITS ENTIRETY. WE AT
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY BELIEVE IN PROVIDINGYOU, OUR CUSTOMER, WITH
A QUALITY PRODUCT WHICH WILL SERVE YOUR NEEDS.
IN THE EVENT YOU DO FIND ANY DISCREPANCY, OR IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
COMMENTS REGARDING YOUR FINAL POLICY, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING
DEPARTMENT AND WE WILL GLADLY HANDLE ANY REQUEST YOU MAY HAVE AS
EFFICIENTLY AND OUICKLY AS POSSIBLB.
TITLE DEPARTMENT
TELEPHONE # (97 0)47 6-22sr
FAX #(970)476-4s34
PLEASE REFER TO ORDER NO. V254205
SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO SELL THE PROPERTY DESCRIBBD IN SCHEDULE A, OR IF YOU
ARE REQUIRED TO FURNISH A NEW TITLE COMMITMENT FOR MORTGAGE PURPOSES, YOU
MAY BE ENTITLED TO A CREDIT TOWARD FUTURE TITLE INSURANCE EXPENSES. LAND
TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY WILL RETAIN A COPY OF THE ENCLOSED TITLE POLICY.
AND IN THE EVENT YOU DO NEED FUTURE SERVICES, WE WILL BE IN A POSITION TO
AGAIN SERVE YOU PROMPTLY AND EFFICIENTLY.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR GIVING LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY THE OPPORTUNITY
TO SERVEYOU.
e o
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY
DISCLOST]RE STATTMENTS
Note: Pursuant to CRS l0-l l-122, notice is hereby given that:
A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.
B) A Certifrcate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained from the County
Treasurer's authoized aget.
Q The infonnation regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts rnay be obtained from
the Board of County Commissioners, the C-ounty Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor.
Note: Effective September l, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing
in the clerk and recorder's office sball contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom
rurgin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that
does not conform, except that, the requirernent for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms
on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document.
Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every
title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording
whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal
documents resulting from the traruaction which was closed". Provided that I-and Titte Guarantee
Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the
legal documenLs from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title
Policy and the knders Policy when issued.
Note: Affirmative rnechanic's lien protection for the Owner nuy be available (typically by deletion
of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commiment from the Owner's Policy to be
issued) upon compliance with the following conditions:
A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitrnent must be a single family residence which
includes a condominium or townhouse unit.
B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of
con^struction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months.
Q The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indenniSing the C-onrpany against un-filed
mechanic's and material-men's liens.
D) The C.ompany must receive paynent of the appropriate premium,
E) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased
within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtaitr coverage
for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction intbrmation; financial infonnation
as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully
executed Indenmity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements
as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company.
No coverage will be given under any circunutances for labor or material for which the insured
bas contracted for or agreed to pay.
Note: Pursuant to CRS l0-l l-123, notice is hcreby given:
This notice applies !o owner's policy commitmetrts containing a mineral severance instrument
exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2.
A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate hes been severed, leased, or otherwise
conveyed from the $xface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party
holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; aud
B) That such mineral estate rnay include the right to enter and use the property without the
surface owner's permission.
Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the covenges
referred to herein unless the above conditions arc fullv satisfied.
Form DISCLoSURE 09/01102
o o
JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY
OF
LAND TITLE GUARANTTE COMPAIVY AND LAI\D TITLE INST]RANCE CORFORATION AND
OLD REPTJBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSTJRANCE COMPANY
Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any finencial institution, directly
or through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal infonnation about you with a
nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a noticc of its privacy policies
and practices, such as the type of inlbrmation that it collects about you and the categories of
persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In comFlirnce with the GLBA, we are providing
you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of hnd ritle
Guarantee Company and Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance
Company.
We may collect nonpublic personal infbnnation about you from the following sources:
Infonnation we receive from you such as on applications or other forms.
Information about your tralNactions we secure from ow files, or from our affiliates or others.
Inforrnation we receive from a consumer reporting agency,
Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real
estate agent or lender.
Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended privacy policy Notice, no additional
nonpublic personal information will be collected about you.
We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our custonrers or former
customers !o our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law.
We also may disclose this infoflnation about our custonrcrs or fonner customers to the following
types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing sewices on our behalf or with whom we
have joint marketing agreements:
* Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance,
securities and insurance.
+ Non-financial companies such as envelope stuffers atrd other firlfillment service providers.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH
ANYONE FORANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW.
We lestrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to
know that information in order to provide products or services to you. we maintain physical,
electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal rcgulations to guard your
nonpublic personal infonnation.
Form PR I V. POL.ORT
o
Couuur,rrv Devgropurrur Ro
o
UTIN
Status:
I Approved
G FORM
n Approved with conditions I Denied
Routed To:Fire /^\ ( .L
Date Routed:04101/06 r';"7/. ./
Routed By:planner-(l(/d/4[qffi,
Date Due:04/06/05
Description of work:Replacement of existing timber wall with new (and new stone fagade on
wall)
Address:725 Forest Road
Lesal:Lot: l6 Block:2 | Subdivision: I Vail Villaoe 6'n Filino
Comments:Date Reviewed:
lssues. Need additional review
Status:
I Approved
co"
"?*
ry DEVELopM ENr nouflre Fonnn
fl Approved with conditions I Denied
Routed To:Public Works
Date Routed:04t01105
Routed By:Planner4,;l,ffiOkt
Date Due:04/06/05
Description of work:Replacement of existing timber wall with new (and new stone fagade on
wall)
Address:725 Forest Road
Legal:Lot:lO lBtock:12 Subdivision:Vail Village 6'n Filing
Gomments:Date Reviewed: 4l04l0s
Need additional review bv Fire
Provide a Revocable ROW oermit for wall encroachino into TOV ROW.
Wall not to exceed 4' in heiqht oer TOV standards.
Wall to start 5'from
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Chad Salli
Elisabeth Eckel; George Chalberg
0410412005 8:07:35 AM
Re: Cadol retaining wall - DRB050114
lf it meets all our cunent standards, then we won't need to see it. They will still need to submit a staging
plan though. \Nhat is the address? We can swing by and take a quick look at it in the field.
Thanks,
Chad Salli, P.E.
Project Engineer
Town of Vail - Public Works
Otfice 9701479-2169
Cell 970/376-2389
Fax9701479-2166
>>> Elisabeth Eckel 04/01/2005 4:17:00 PM >>>
Hi gentlemen:l was assigned an application this week that involves the replacement of an existing timber
retaining wall with a new retaining wall, this one with a stone face but in the same location and at the same
height.
However, no plans/drawings of the wall itself were submitted. lsn't this going to be necessary foryour
review or does PW just consider this a same-for-same sort of application?l will put a set in your box here if
you care to pick it up. lf you know right now that you will need wall drawings, etc, let me know and I won't
even ask you to waste your time picking up the application. Thanks for your time and insightslElisabeth
/** Z/r"- r-l-""- ar- /4,
,%, ;z/U- //'/v' a'q
-//r4r,r"/ 'atry ?7/
#*
;tz/*
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
nx 970-479-2452
www.vailgov.com coFP
April 8, 2005
Mr. Roger Cadol
9850 East Progress Circle
GreenWood Village, CO 801 11
Re: Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Village 6'n Filing
725 Forest Road, Vail CO 81657
DRB0s0114
Dear Mr. Cadol,
Thank you for submitting an application for design review of a refinished retaining wall the above address. .The
plans have been reviewed by the Town of Vail Planning and Public Works Deparlments and the following items
must be resolved prior to any approvals being given:
1. The existing and proposed refinished wall lie partially within the Town of Vail's right-ol.way. Please
complete and return the enclosed Revocable Right-of-Way permit and its associated fee to allow for the ' encroachment of the wall into the Town's right-of-way.
2. The wall shall not exceed four feet (4') in height at any location. Please submit a drawing of the wall
or a revised site plan which designates compliance with this height limit. Compliance with this regulation
may also be designated on the site plan by providing the lop of wall" and "bottom ol wall" elevations at
several points along the wall.
3. The wall shall not exist closer to the edge of asphalt (Forest Road) than five leet (5') in any location.
Please designate on the revised site plan that this requirement will be met.
Thank you for submitting your application. I look forward to receiving clarification of the above issues at your
do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns.
970.479.2454
enclosure
fi "".""rt, "ro"*
o
Depaitment of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
MX 970-479-2452
www.vailgov.com
April 20, 2005
Mrs. Sally Cadol
9850 East Progress Circle
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
Re: Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Viltage 6'h Filing
725 Forest Road, Vail CO 81657
DR8050114
Dear Mrs. Cadol,
Thank you for submitting an application for design review of a refinished retaining wall the above address. I
understand that the wall is going to be replaced with a stone-faced block retaining wall in the exact location in
which it exists today. The site plan indicates that it is not currently located in the Town of Vail right-of-way.
Therefore, I have approved the application with the following two conditions:
1. The applicant shall ensure that, at the finish of construction, the wall does not exceed four feer
(4') in height at any location, regardless of its current height.
2. The applicant shall ensure that ihe wall is constructed no closer to the edge of asphalt (Forest
Road) than five feet (5').
A final inspection of the wall will be required, at which time the Community Development Department will visit the
. site to ensure that the conditions have been complied with. When the wall is complete, please contact the
Community Development Department at970.479.2139 to schedule that inspection. Thank you for your patience
in what is not always a simple designreview process. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any remaining
questions or goRperns. ,-/
Best
i - ;.':
Eckel
970.479.2454
enclosure
{p ^r""."", *nr"*
rut Upy
TOWNOFVAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970-479-2738
OIIINER
CONTRACTORG&GROOFING
P.O. BOX 817
FRTSCO eO
8 0443
Li-cense | L24-s
APPI-,ICA]'iTT G & G ROOFING
P.O. BOX 8l_7
FRTSCO CO
80443
License . !24-S
o o
MMUNITYD EVELopMENT U3;\ O,t(E cS
Permit #: B0l-0176
Status . .
Applied.
Issued .
Expires .
Phone:
.: ISSUED
.: 06/22/2007 ..: 06/22/2001 ..: 12/19/2001
0 # ofGas [ogs: 0
Lo\-<" . -B\K {
#of
DEPARTMENTOFCO
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON TOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ADD/ ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT
Job Address: 725 FOREST RD VAIL
Location.....: 6750 E PROGRESS CIRCLE
ParcelNo...: 21010721001,0
Project No : (\tr
CADOL, ROGER V. & SAIJIJY M.
9850 E PROGRESS CIR
GREENWOOD VIIJLAGE CO
I0L11
Lricense:
06/22/200L
06/22/20Ot Phone: 970-668-55s2
06/22/20OL Phone: 97O-668-5552
Description:
REMO\E/DISPOSE OF EXISTING ROOF. SAME FOR SAME
Occupancy:
Type Construction:
Wood Pelle[
Valuation:
Fireplace Inf ormation:
Building----->
Plan Check-->
Investigation->
wijl call-->
$16,495.00 Add Sq Ft:
Restricted: Y
0
# of Gas Appliances:
$215.00 Restuarant Plan Review->
$13 9 . ?s DRB Fee-------------->
g0 . 00 Recreation Fce-------------->
g3 . oo Clean-up Deposit-->
TOTAL FEE$---------->
$0.00
$50.00
s0.00
$0.00
$407.?s
Total Calculated Fees->
Additional Fees------>
Total Permit Fee-->
Payments------;
BALANCE DUE->
$40?. ?s
$5s.00
9462.1s
1462.13
so.oo
Approvals:Itdm: 05100 BUIIJDING DEPARTMEI{II
o6/22/2o0L DF Action: AP
Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENI
Item: 05500 FIRE DEPARTMENI
Item: 05500 PIIBLIC WORKS
See page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit.
o
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an
accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and
plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning
and subdivision codes, design review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of the Town applicable
thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR UOUnS ru ADVANCE BY TELEPHoNE AT 479-2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 5
PM.
Send Clean-up Deposit To: N/A
OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF
PAGE 2
***t*******lt*******************#***************************************rt****rk*********rf*********!t!l*****
CONDITIONSOF APPROVAL
Perndt #: B0'1.-0175 as of OG22-200]. Status: ISSUED
************************rtrt**ra****rt********rt****************************************x********************
Permit Type: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT Applied: 06/22/2001.
Applicanf G&GROOFING Issued: 06/22/2007
970-668-5552 ToExpire: 72/79/2007
fob Address: 725 FOREST RD VAIL
Location: 6750 E PROGRESS CIRCLE
ParcelNo: 21,0107210070
Description:
REMOVE/DISPOSE OF EXISTING ROOF. SAME FOR SAME
************Hrt***********i**********lr*********** COnditiOnS
Cond:12
(BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE
COMPLIANCE.
Cond:16
(BLDG.): SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED IN ALL BEDROOMS AND
EVERY STORY AS PER SEC.310.6.1 OF THE 1997 UBC.
* * * * * * *** ** *l' '1.**,1.**** ** ** * * * ** * * ++* * ** +***** f *f++ + +** + +*++ *** ** * ** * * * * * * ** * * ** * **** ** * * **** *
TOWN OF VAIL. COLORADO Statement
'1.
***,1**** * * **** **,1.* ** ***** * *** ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * + * * * ******* **** *'f * **** *1.*****{.'} * * ******{.
statement Nurnber: R000000984 Anount.: i462.75 06/22/20071"2:48 PM
Palment Method: Check fnit: LC
Notation: *2L606/e&c Roofing
Permi! No: 801-0176 1lrtr)e: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT
Parcel No: 2TOIO72LOOL0
Site Address: 725 FOREST RD VAIL
Location: 5750 E PROGRESS CIRCITE
Total Fees: 5462.75
This Payment: i462.75 Total AIrIr Pmts3 i462.75
Balance: $0.00
*******+*t*'l***********'l+**'*****t *i**+**f,**++*****t*******lt***************fl*f,+****l{.'}+*++++
ACCOIJNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code DescriDtion Current Pmts
BP OO1OOOO31111OO BU]LDING PERMIT FEES
CL OO1OOOO3123OOO CONTMCTOR LICENSES
DR ()O1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEW FEES
PF OO1OOOO31123OO PLAN CHECK FEES
hlc 00100003112800 i^/ILL CALL INSPECTI0N FEE
215.00
55.00
50.00
139.75
3.00
o
CATION VUILT
tl
NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIGNED
Project #:
Building Permit #:
97 A- 479 -2L49 (Inspections)
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, Colorado 81657
COMPLETE VATUA bor & Materials
e
CTOR
General Contractor:Town of Vail Reg. No.:Contact and Phone #'s:
Brvce Johnson 668-5552
\qo'3a7k <e-rt
BUILDING:$ l-6,495.00
' For Parcel # Conbd Assessorc 97O-328-8ilO or visit
't ****************** ***** * **** * *** *** * * FoR oFFICE USE ON LY****** ****** ** * ****** **********rr***** *
of Construction:
P:rceli# 2IO LO7 2100 10
(applicationr wilhnot be acceptedtlrilihout, iarcel nuwrber]
Job Name: Cadol Residence Job Address: 725 Forrest Rd.
't
Legal Description ll t-ot: o ll etoclc z llriting: ! llsuUOirision:Vaii vall-ey
Owners Name:Rnrtar ,(, Sa1Iv Cada-l 6d#qfft'*- prooress circre rPlBBTzzo-ssgz
Architect/Designer:Address:Phone:
Engineer:Address:Phone:
Detailed description of work: Remove OOispos
Shietd and wood shingles same.as existing
WorkClass: New() Addition( ) Remodel( ) Repair( ) Demo( ) OtherS) ilroot
rrA/6ik Typ-e: Interior ( ) Exterior [< ) Both ( )Does an EHU exist at this locat'roUte|7 ) No ( )
Typeof Bldg.: Single-family( ) Two-family(x) Mutti-famity( ) Commerciat ( ) Resraural(tlryr(-)
No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building:No. of Accommlit"J$hFis buildins:
No/Type of Fireplaces Existinq: Gas Appliances I Gas Loqs t ) wood/PDWt Burninq (
Does a Fire Alarm Exist Yes ( ) No (Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes ( ) No ( )
F:/everyone/fi orms/bld gperm RE0'D JUN 2 72001
6b/2L/268r
FAr
1"1.:59 974-744-9784
$t1- Lrfi-
ELECTRIC
o
DOUBLE O PAGE 02
Twfluwn,
75 $. Frontr3c Bd.
YrlL Colcr.do tt6tt
I
r..rr.t|rrr.tr....r..rrr.r...ttataarrataFOROFFICE USE OilLY.rr.rr.rrtr.*a.....att*a.aa.r.aaattaa.
ATqOUTTTOF SQ FT NI STRI'CTURE:
ffit
n
**'P* e*i-s Job Addrcsr:t" zfu,- etub * |
l4gal Dcsqlpdon I fot: I Bloclc I Fl[ml SubdlvBhn:
Eigincer: I Addrcss:Plnc:
ffiImA*siptbnof rvodc *N ftbut Q ( ,.r{ts
LJaAr QtJtea - t.DD ZtH EM-A -U. +On /Lq t ' tu{y.< tfkill
WorkChss: nw( ) fddEon( ) Remdel(# Repair( ) TilPPoner( ) Odrer( )
wort Type: Intuhr $rJ rrtedor t() 8o0t ( ) | Does an EHU qist at thb bcatin: Ycs ( ) llo ( )
lpcofug.: *rffilrr[y( ) Dwk( ) tldU-h$tfZJ.Cotnmuol( ) nEEunnt( ) Odttt( )
t{o. of Ed*ing Drlclling UnhJ in $is hribing: A No. d Amrmodation Unlts h thts boldlngr Ll
Is Urs oernrit for a hot tub: Yes ( ) ilo ()l
Doesa-nrt&rynFrFta Y€56/1. ilo( ) lDoesrFrcSpnnr4gSystanb&: Yes( ) t{o( )(
,'
JuN ? t ?oo1
roq4999!F/as}lndbflnr/dqrm
TOWNOFVAIL
75 S.FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970-479-2138
Project No :
OWNER cADOr,, ROGER V. 6. SALLY
9850 E PROGRESS CIR
GREENWOOD VII,I,AGE CO
I0111
License:
CONTRACToF-,IERRY S IBI-,EY
P.O. BOX 340
MII{ITURN, CO
81645
License: L52 -M
APPL'ICAI{T .IERRY SIBIJEY PI-'IIMBING
P.O. BOX 340
MINTURN, CO
81545
License:152-M
Desciption: REPLACE BOILER AND WATER HEATER
Valuation: $7,000.00
FireDlace Information: Restricted: ?? # ofcas Appliances:
*,r,ri*,t*'l*,*,r,*,t,1****,1.t'l*,t***'l+,*,t,t*'t,t*+*'t't't'*l***'i'l'i+****'lt++'**'jit**t*'i'|'i*
oepallr',rslrr oF coMMUNITY DEVELoPMnO O.-^\ O,[\.1. u
B\t A,trY Co
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
PLT]MBING PERMIT
725 FOREST RD VAIL
725 FOREST RD E/SIDE
Permit #: P0l-0034
ISSUED
05109/2001
05llll200l
tlt07/2001
M.05/09/200L Ptrone:
os/09/zooL 9'10-827 -5736
05/09/2OOr Phone: 970-827-5736
?? # ofcas Logs: ?? # of Wood Pallet: ??
FEE SUMMARY 't*)i:r***'*'*'i*i**'**)t*****,t*'t'i't***'itt****l'*'i*'i******'t**i'i******'i
Plumbing-->
Plan Check-->
lnvestigation->
Will Call--->
05/09/2O0t DFl,oFGs
Itemr 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT
9105 . oo Restuaranl Plan Review->
126.2s DRBFee----------->
$0. oo TOTAL FEDS---"-->
s3.00
90.00
90.00
$134 .25
Total Calculated Fees-->
Additional Foes------>
Total Permit Fee---->
Paymenls---------->
BALANCE DLIE-__->
s134 .25
s0.00
$134 .25
;L34.25
so.0o
IIEM: O51OO BUILDING DEPARTMENI
AcEion: APPR
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
Cond! 12
(BLDG.): FIEI-,D INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO SHECK FOR CODE COMPLIAIiICE'
***tt*t*****++*l*a
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, fille.d out in full the information required, completed an accurato plot plalL and
state that all the informatron as required i, .b*.t. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town
ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, desigr review approved,
uniform Building code and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPEICNON SHALL BE MADE TWENTT.FOT'R HOI'RS IN ADVA}iICE BY oLrR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AI\d - 5 Pl,L l
Z "c,*-rsr{s_{-7^/r ffio'
ffiffi ffi : ffiiffi:frffiffi ffi lffilT il H,:;
-,-'- - o * * * {' * + * * * * + * +ffi
;l
Statement
. ,|l,t t rt,|!*******,t++t,tr*+i**'|.:|!*rt**,|.**'|!******'t*t!{.'}*************++****'t't***:t*****'}'}**lt******'t**tt{''l**
statement Number: R000000741 Amount: $134.25 05/IL/2OOLO?:58 Plit
Palment lilethod: Check Init : DF
NoEation: CHECK #28383 JERRY SIBLEY
Permit No: PO1-0034 T14re: PLUI'IBING PBRIIIIT
Parce1 No: 210107210010
Site Addreee: 725 FoREST RD veIL
Location: 725 FOREST P'D E/SIDE
Total Feee: $L34.25
Ttrie Payment: $134.25 Total AIJIJ Pmts: $134'25
Balance: $0.00
|'|tt * ** + ***'t,t***:t,|.**,tdt,l:|.,}*** * '*'f * ****+ * *** 't******:|.,.* '* {.*******
'!*|t*'}
!t,t****++ ***{t'} **+** * * *** '}:t* **
ACCOIJNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Curnent Pmts
PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 26.25
PP OO1OOOO31112OO PLUI4BING PERMIT FEES 1()5.OO
t^lC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTI0N FEE 3'00
ApplrcATroNla, "ot BE AccEprED rF rNcoMplErl* un"rnnro
Project #:d r3Ll,Qs
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, Colorado 81657
Building Permit #:
Plumbing Permit #:
97 O- 47 9-2149 (Inspections)
Town of Vail Reg. No.:Contact and t &nrk Pal -.s'7 3 b
TION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT (Labor & Materials)
PLUMBING: $49
Assessorc Office at 970-328-864O or visit
Parcel # (Required if no bldg. permit # is provided above) ;
Workblass: New( ) Addition( ) Alteration( ) Repairffi Other( )
Typeof Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Duplex $() MultFfamily ( ) Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other( )
No. of Accommodation Units in this building:No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building:
Is this a conversion from a wood burning fireplace to an EPA Phase II device? Yes ( ) No
**r.************************************FOR OFFICE USE ONLY*************************************
F/everyone/forms/plmbperm
RECDIylAYOsZOO'
Pe ,Jnffi.wnHYou?
Town of Vail Survey
Community Development Department Russell Fones! Director,
(970) 479.213e
Check allthat applies.
1. Which Departnent(s) did you conhct?
Building _ Environmental_ Housing_ Admin Planning DRB
2. Wasyourinilialcontactwiihourstaffimrnediaie dow 0r , no one available ?
-3. lf you were required to wai{ how long was it before you were
helped?_
4. Was your project reviewed on a tmely basis? Yes / No
lf no, why noP
S/as this your first time to file a DRB app_ PEC app
Bldg Permit IVA
Please rate the performance of the staff person who assisted you:54321Name:
(knowledge; responsiveness, availability)
Overall effectiveness of fie Front Service Counter. 5 4 3 2
What is the best time of day for you to use fie Front Service
Counter?
9. Any comments you have which would allow us io beter serve you
nexttime?
Thank you for taking the lime to compleie this survey. We are
committed b improving our service.
7.
a
?
+l
+T
il
;l
:l
2 o 4
E
-C)€
3
'n
_9
d
,qJ v)
hl **l
rl l.
l
+l +l
€l
ol
TI
r-s
I
,fl -:l
f,J (tc
&l
st
a)
=v)
q)
E t
Le t)c-(
F\r
tl
JI
rl q/t
gL
dl
-,t
..i"o
nqussbdiffimTb! F-BlHlfutsiyr$?t,sr
|nsnc€f,ofir-yFc; PLIHB
ln*tccilsr lEb6: CO 9B Arktreeg: 725 FOREST frO VAL
AFmfiliorna{0q
IteffCommflils:
lnsn*cil,on Hlrlsnr
725 FOREST RI} ETSID€
$rsrlH: An.re
Phofts: 9fi!"84?"6?36 Ftrne: 97S&?-8t38
R€filcshd Tlme: 08:{X} At ' FhEn : g?tl'&?.673$
En&rod By: FRsN.lT K
$bne: t$$tED lrpArea: CD
t ':'r :ir'i'
'{r
ll8m:
lhml
lsm:
ItEm;
mm:
ItB{r}:
llstfi:
210 tto ,3n Irp
a60
26S ffi
0&24/0t
Comtflh{ds;'cr$on: h,R fiOl'RENIY FOft $l"SpECTlO|.1
$hfi wln reoei',r'rl$k.
t\
Mu*
YIf "JT
trER }{EATER
r 290 FLilB"Flnrl : .,ERRY StsLEY FI.l : WCK{TEBfiLER i CnAU$
RgPlrt31 Run Id,: 650
,(a*4, g/( 3 O /" Ui/,re u
07931
Phone t 970-476-6933
TOV/Comm. Dev.
Clean-up Depqsit Refund
Single Family ResiderilfflOUnt
Type V Non-Rat,ed date
A.dd Sq Ft:
*of cae Appliancea:
FEE SIJMMARY
See Page 2 of this Documents for any conditions Uhat may apply Eo tshis permiE.
DECLAzuITIONS
I hcreby acknowledge Ehat I have read thig application, fllled outs in fulL the infotoation required, conpletsed an accurabe plot
plan, and statse ghac all Che information provided aE required 16 corEect. I aEr€e tso courply with th€ information and ploC plan,
tso couply nith alt Town ordinance6 and stace lawE, and lo build chiB EEruccure accordinE !o th€ Tonn's zoning and eubdiviBion
codcs, dcsLgn rcview approvcd, Uniform Building codc and oth€r ordinanceg of th€ Town appLicablc thereto.
iIOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit. #: B00-0052
Statsus...: ISSIIED
IIALF)Applied. . : 0a/L3/2000
Issued. . .: 04/L9/2000
Ex;rires . .: to/L6/2ooo
Phone:. 970-949-L905
Phone:. 9'70-949-L905
Phone: 970-476-6933
t
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FROI\ITAGE ROAD vArt, co 81657
970-479-2138
APPLICAIiTT
CONTRAC"TOR
OVIINER
OWNER
Description:
DEPARII,{ENT OF COMMT'NITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: TIIIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON
ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT
Job Address: 725 FOREST RD
LOCAEiON...: 725 FOREST RD (WEST
Parcel No. . : 2L01,-072-L0-01-l-
Project No.:
PTATII CONSTRUCTION
P.O. DRAWER 5920, AVON, CO 81520
PI,ATH CONSTRUCTION
P.O. DRAWER 5920, AVON, CO 81620
COI-,MAR PARTNERSHIP W/MAHER
251 FOWI-,ER RD FAR HILLS, SOMERSET NJ
I4AHER ,fERRY AND '.IOAN 725 FOREST RD, VArL, CO 8l-657
*Of Gas Logs I *of wood/PalLee:
Building----->
PIan cheek- - ->
InwescigaCion>
will. call- - - ->
Regtuaranc Plan Rewiew- - >
DRB Fce- - -------
Recreation Fee---------->
clean-Up Deposic-------->
TOTAI, FEES- -. -.
Total Calculated Fees- - - >
.Additional Fcc6--------->
Total Perrtrit Fee-------- >
Palmenle-------
BAIANCE DUE.-.-
350. OO
.oo
3.00
-oo
.00
.oo
250 . OO
s30 .50
430.50
- 00
s30.50
430.50
- 00
ITEM: O51OO BUILDING DEPARTMEI T DCPT: BUII,DING DiViSiON:
O4/L7/2OOO KATIIY ACtiON: APPR APPROVED PER-KW Itsbm:. O54OO PI,ANNING DEPARTMEIITT DePT: PI,ANNING DiViSiON:
O4/I7/2OOO KATITY ACtiON: APPR SIGNED OFF BY AT..TN ITbM:. 05600 FIRE DEPARTTVIEIiIT DCPE: FIRE DiViSiON:O4/!7/2OOO KATHY ACTiON: APPR N/A ITbM:. O55OO PTIBLIC WORKS DEPL: PTTB WORK DiViSiON:O4/L7/2000 KATHY AcEion: APPR N,/A
SAME FOR SAI,iIE RE-ROOF & INSTAL,L ICE/WATER FLASHdpPfOVgd
Occupancy: R3 Ilpe Construction: V N
Valuation:29 ,98L
Fireblace Inf oa1naEio'l: Rcstricted: YEg
REQUESTS FOR IN€PECTIONg SMIJIJ BE MADE IWENTY-FOUR HOI'RS IN ADVANCE BY TEIJEP
S€nd el:an-Up DcpoeLt To: PLI,TH CONS?RUCIO STGNATTJRE * O oR coMRAeToR FoR HTMSELF rr{D owNER
Page 2 ********************************************************************************
COIIDITIONS
Permit #: 800-0052 as of 04/L9/00 Status---: ISSITED ********************************************************************************
Permit Tl49e: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT applied--: Oa/L3/2OOO
Applicanr--: PLATH CONSTRUCTTON rssued---: O4/L9/2000
970-949-L905 To E:qrire: L0/L6/2O00
ilob Address: 725 FOREST RD
Locatrion---: 725 FOREST RD (WEST HALF)
Parcel No-- : 2L01,-072-10-01-1
VAII, VILI,AGE FILING 6 LOT 6 BLK2
DescripEion:
S.AME FOR SAITIE RE-ROOF & INSTAI.,IJ ICE/WATER FI'ASHING
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * COndiEiOnS * * * rt * * * !t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1. FIELD INSPE TIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR EODE COMPLIANCE.
2. SMOKE DETEETORS ARE REQUIRED IN ALL BEDROOMS AND EVERY STORY
AS PER SEC.31_0.5.1 0F THE 1997 UBC.
3. ABSOLUTEIJY NO PARKING OR STAGTNG OF MATERIALS ALLOWED ON
FOREST RD.
t * * t i * * !r t * * * * * * * il * * !l * !r * t !r a + *** it * * t * * * rl ir * * t * * * * * * + * !t I *t * * I * * * t i * *
TOWN OF VAIL, COLOR,ADO Statemnt
*t****t**t!tt*l*****tt*t*lt*******t**i*t************itl*******+i**
gtatemnt Number: RBC-061? Anount:830.50 04/19 /AO 13 t37
Payment Method: cK Notation 3 *24775 /Pl,NrH Init: LC
Permj.t No:
Parcel No:
Site AddreEE :
Irocatlon:
Thie Payment
B00-0052 T)'tr)e: A-BUILD ADD/ALT
2101-072-10-0L1
725 FOREST RD
?25 FOREST RD (WEST HALF)
Total Fees:
830.50 Total ALL Pmts:
Balance :
SFR BUTID PE
t******ir*t********l*******t***ll}t+****!r*******l******i*******+**
Account code De6cription
BP OO1OOOO31111OO BUII.DING PERMIT FEES
PF OO1OOOO31123OO PI,AN CHBCK FEES
AD D2 -DEPO8 CLEAI\TUP DEPOSITS
WC OO1OOOO31128OO WILL CALI, INSPECTION FEE
830 .50
830 . so
. o0
Anount
350.00
227.50
250.00
3.OO
o
o
'H 3E dI
o
o 0 o o
o
o
al
o
ct
o
T
H
E
g
E
o
o
o
C'
c
o
al
C'
..
o o
aa
F{o2 .o ou
a!
i E .E
A
u U H A o A |:
c !l o D
r \o o o .|
o
It 6l o
a
:i da !t
A B H
!|{E.E
Eg;H'aont :8 i c!{\oao
aa A
B H !l
E
E i.
o
H ! l.a
3E AI a
UI co cro IA OT oo !
o
EE
E8 l'a
B
EE i8 Hil I A H o
HFI tsE oo A-Erl A
E t
r,
E H I o
E
E
E rl
6 I c
E G'I
E8
Il tl
AI
i
Bl HI
Al el Dl
H'cl O'
El cl
AI zl El
El cl
I ti'
al ol
BI AI
IE
'k
I
I aal
trt rI rr rl
rt rI
t!i rI t rl ie iE .a rt I E \rl.l I l,
lg i .cl rta M.| |!laO I t.*f,- rR E6t i 6
EE€ I
$tr
.BoD -0052-
PER}IIT #
r APPLTCATTON MUST BE TTLLED OUT COITPLETELy OR IT ttAy Nor BE AccEprED
Ii***************************** PEIU,IIT fNFORI.iATION **************************;**tlr
r-Buildlng t l-plu4rbing [ ]-Electrlcal I l-Mechdnt'cat r t-orher
Job Nane:
Legal Description: Lot BIock fifing sutorvrsrolr,
na""a n
970-32
CEL /I:
Ey
r -7
un
fo
gle
-864 )tcs
a
8
c;
0 I
ov,ners Name: @ Address TNFor"st td /iA ph.47k6?s3
Architect:Address:Ph.
sh'rnq\es t tr GeneraL Description:
work crass: [ ]-New irltr€ffiffi ,-*urtronvar ,' ,l**.* *:-*n""
Nurnber of Dwelllng Units:Number of Acconrnodatlon Units:
'i; #
dq:ili#ifi..e: Yr*-eg$r"g;r""o,PERMTT APPT4CATTON FORM DATEI_lzfu?L
. {pmber and rype of Fireplaces: cas Appriances-. Gas Logs_ I{ood/perret_v ft********************************* VALUATIONS *********************************'l nrtr>Ol4O :yllPlllg: l-44ft L ELEcrRrcAL, !_ : _ orHER: $PLTJMBING: $ , MECHANICAL, $-- ToTil; $-3-FTI=--:
ff********************Q**,rrr cory$RAcroR rNFoIlMATroN ***************************
' EeneraL Contractorl 4 / n'Y/- 1 ';a*-'n',ffi rr'ar.rn ^r' r'^l.t Tr-- i,^ t,lnD Town of Vall Req. No. /Address z' t) pnone-H*nb;;;--EleJ#
:^t::::::.I contracror: __ rown of vail Res. No.Aqcrress:
PLumbing Contractor: Town of Vall Reg. NO.Address:------ Phone Number:
Mechanlcal Contractor:Town of Vail Reg. NO._Aqqress:
********************************
BUILDTNG PERMIT FEE:
PLUMBING PERMTT FEE:
MECHANTCAL PERMIT FEE:
ELECTRICAI.I FEE;
OTHER TYPE OF FEE:
DRB FEE:
FOR OFFTCE USE *******************************
BUILDTNG PI.AN. CHECK I'EE:
PLWBTNG PIJI,N cHEcK TEE!UECHANICAIJ PI,AN CHECK FEE!
RECREATION .,FEE:
CIEAN-UP DEPOSIT:
TOTAI, PERMIT FEESS
BUTLDING:
SIGNATURE:
ZONING:
SIGNATURE:
VALUATION
CLEA}I I'P DEPOSIT IEFIINI! TO:
Page 2 of 3
March 3.2000
Roofins Specification for Maher Residence @ 725 Forest Road ** West duplex only** -
I. SPECTALNoTES:
1l Due to the steepness ofthe roof, all measurements were taken from the ground. Therefore, all
Dricing is conting-ent upon verification of the measurements taken, All pricins in this proposal are
hot exceed numb-ers. We feel.we can firm up our numbers once final m'easurelments aie tiken from
the roof instead of the ground.
II. Tn,q.n OFr/ MrscELLANEous:Locations: The pitched roofs at 725 forest road as follows.
!J lhc upp-ef roofs at the west duplex.
zl !G UiiaE; r-o-olf ;nn;ciin!,tG"*eii duplex and garage house. ( Garase house is excluded)
3l The lowe-r roof above the irain entranc6 to the wEst funlex ( fucins eXO.
41 The lower roofs above the hot tub and common walkwhv. ( The lo=wer roof facine north of
I I Thc upper roofs at the west
2l The biidse roof connectinp il iiie i<i*8i'bof ,r:t;vJtft
-fr
1l The lower roofs above the I above the hot tub and common walkwbv. ( The lo=wer r6of facine north offthe
east duplex is excluded.)
5l The lower bav window facins west.
ri attached draiving for a high'lighted sketch ofthe areas we have figured to re-roof.**
Specifi cations as follows:II Tear offexistins cedar shineles. felt" and flashinss and remove all debris fiom the site, Plath
Construction will [eeo the iobs-ite is cl6an as Dossi6le and oractical durins the construction. and a thoroush
cleanine of Plath's w<irk ar6as wrll be perform'ed upon combletion. Plath Construction wrll iake all
reasondble precautions to protect thc iirterior of th6 buildine from water and weather. Howevcr. Platlr
Constructioh will not be hbld liable for any interior damage-sustained from leaks caused by sudden and/or
unforseen storms that occur during the tedr offphase of ttris work.
2l Inspect the plywood for water damase. and replace as needed.** This work. if required. will be an
aildrtronal chaiee over and above the cdniract prii:c. and will be charecd at the rate oT$ 2.85 Der souare
foot. No additional charges will be incurred r.v'ithout prior notificatio-n of, and authorization from, dre
owner or owner's agent. *
3l Plath construction will provide all insurance and permits required by the Town of Vail Building
D'eoartment.
* *See thC
Price for Section l:Included in Section I prices below
Exclusions and Oualifications:l] Any work asso-ciated with heat tape is excluded and to be removed by others prior to the re-roofing
process.
ru. Dnv-IN / Crnan SHrNcr-r PpnrEcrroNs / PREFTNTsHED FLASHTNG:Locatiols:_ The pitchpd roofs at 725 forest road as follows.ll The upper roofs at the west duplex.
2l The bhdge roofconnecting thswest duplex and garage house. ( Garage house is excluded)
3l The lowe-r roofs above the-main entranie to the ficstiuolex ( ficine e-ast).{l The lower roofs above thc hot tub and common walkwa:y. ( The lo#er roilf facing north off the
2l The bhdge roofconnecting thswest duplex and garage house. ( Garage house is excluded)
3l The lowe-r roofs above the-main entranie to the ficstiuolex ( ficins e-ast).3l The lowel
4l The lower
east duplex is excluded.)
5l Thelower bay window facing west.
Specifications as Follows:
I I Install "Jift-Seal" Ice and Water Guard bv "Protecto Wrap" over entire Ditched roof area. accordinq to
m-anufacturerd' spgci_fications. Extend memb"rane up walls atriproximately l2r' at roof-to-wall junctureE.
Use mastic as needed.
2l Install #l cedar shinele perfections over the pitched roofs as specified abovc. Use starter and hip-and-
ridge shingles as needeil. The cedar shingles will be installed with a standard pattern and 5" reveal'to the
welther. xThese shakes do not have a lire rating.*
3l Install 24 gatge prefinished flashings as needed, includrng valley, step, and endwall flashing. Install 24
gauge prefinilheil dilp edge flashing aieave and rale edges.-
4l Install 24 gatge prefinished pressure flashing at all endwall and sidewall conditions. Seal the top edge
Page 3 of3
of the counter flashins with a clcar urethane caulk to assure a watertisht seal to the roof to wall locations.
The membrane will bE terminated under this flashing. Color to be selEcted from a standard color chart.
5l At the new roof to existins roof tie-ons. Plath will remove two to three rows of shineles and tie the new
waterproofing membrane int-o the existing'roofing system to cnsure a watertight seal. -
Price for Section I & II:$ 29.98r.00
ry. Gnunnal Norrs:
l I Please be advised that materials for this proposal have been bid at current market prices. Due to
v6latiliw of the market. material prices canirotbe suaranteed past 30 davs.* Please t-ake note that a
"letter irf intent" received bv Pfath Constructioi. Inc. within the 30 dav period will allow us to "lock in" current material prices,6ven if actual purcha6es are made several mohths later.
2l The #l cedar shinele oerfections for this proposal have been bid at the current market price of$ 148,85
per square. Due to the extreme volatility ofthi cedar market, price changes prior to thc atceptance of this
irropotal will require rencgotiation of thi: contract price, to reffect any sudh changes
3l Plath Construction carries propefi damaqe liabilitv insurance in the amount of $2.000.000.00 per
oicurrence. Plath Constructi6n iarri-es auto'insuranc6 in the amount of $2.000.000 00. Plath Coristruction
carries aopronriate Workrnan's Compensation insurance throueh Colorado State Compensation. No
further iniurdnce coverage is included in our price, and if required, the additional cost'will be added to the
contract pnce.
4l Uoon receiot of the contract price. Plath Construction will issue a warrantv certificate suarantccing
r<iofi'ns asainSt leaks due to flaws in workmanship for a period of two vcars from the datdof roofing -
complEtish. Leaks qualif ing under thc terms of 'said wairranty. will be .repaired promptly at no cost-to the
owncr. lhrs warranty cloes not covcr any subsequent rntenor diamage tnat may occur.
V. Oprroxs:
l I All pricins in this proposal is based on the work being completed between the summer months of
May 15, 2000 and Sebteinber 30, 2000. Ifthe iob is delayed, lor reasons out of Plath's control,
additiond charges will apply for'working undeir adverse winier conditions.
r
+'{11,* s(* int
qil(q * SbpeAl qt\c#s
REpT131 "
A9/@7 /e$@tl 07:38
.T0t^tN trF vAIL,
RERUESTS - INSPECTN Ii|ORK
COLORRDfi
SHEETS FORI 9/ 7/E@
PFIEE I:
ffREffr JRFI
Aetivity:B€IB-OB5€ 9l 7/eA
Address: 735 F0REST RF
Location: 7PS FOREST RD (WEST
Fareel : 8101-O7E-1Et-O1 I
De scri pt i on l
Type; A*HUILD
HffLF}
RE-ROOF & INSTALL
TION
Statu*: I.$$UED Constr: ADUP
Oec:User V N
ICE/WATER FLASHIN6
Fhone: 9E-948-19OF
Phonr"' : 97tl*476-6933
Fhone z 97V-949-19o3
Flppl ican
o
Contrat or-
Inspect i on Requ
Request or' : STE
Req Tine! 01
Items req[ested
60544 BLDG-Final
RgHIF I^I/MftHER
RUCTION
Information.
Comment s:o be Inspected.
C/E
i veway grade f inal
ootings/$teeL
olrndat i on/5t ee I
ILC $ite Plan
l'amrng
Insul at ion
-Sheett'ock Nai I *Mi sc.
inal
Temp. C/0 Final tr/O
Fhone: g4!i_1grZr5
Act ion Comments
st
E
Tire Exl
Inspect i on
Item:Itenl
Item:
Iten:
It em:
Item:
Item:
Item:
Item:Iten:Iten:i
Hi st or
orzrslra d
AgilalrA I
ra@oera
4CI5e6
tataoS0
E0'a5E
0rAOGa
h|ail7q
0bra9B
'arts30 40.544
BLD
BLD
BLD
BLD
BLD
BLD
c^'l {it 6'9,
€,r;. COLMAR PA
\
I I
Project Name: Maher addition
Pri99-0217
Project Description: 100 sq. ft. addition
Owner, Address, and Phone: Gerry and Joan Maher
Box 2007
Avon, CO 81620
Architect/Contact, Address, and Phone: John Perkins
PO Box 2007
Avon, CO 81620
Project Street Address: 725 Forest Rd.
Legal Description: Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Village 6th
Parcel Number: 210107210010
Comments:
Design Review Action Form
TOWN OFVAIL
BuildingName:
Board/Staff Action
Action:StaffApproval Motion by:
Seconded by:
Vote:
Conditions:
Town Planner: Allison Ochs
Date: 7123199
Project Name: Maher Addition
VAILDATA/EVERYONE\DRBWPROVALS\1 DRBAPPR
DRB Fee Paid: $50
Qucstions? f rn" Pliuning Staif :r. .i,-::-- i2l3
APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL
frJW-or41 GENEML INFORMATION
This application is for any projcct rcquiring Dcsigrr Rcviov approvai. Any projcct rcquiring dcsigr.revicw must
rcccivc Design Rwicw approval prior to submitting for a buiiding pcrmil For specific information, sco thc subrnittal
rcquircmorts for thc particuiar appmval that is requcsted Thc applicatiou cannot be acceptcd until ail the required
infbrmation is submincd. Thc projcct may also nccd to bc rcvicrvcd by thc Town Council andlor thc Planning and
Environmc'nial Conrmi.ssion. Design Rcview Board approval cxpires onc ycar aftcr final approval unlcos a
building permit is issued and constructior is startcd.
LOCATTONOFPROPOSAT: rc'r: h BLOCK: 2- FTLTNG: c2
A.
C.
D.
E.NAME OF OWNER(S):
MAiLING
OWNER(S) SIGNATTJRE(S):
NAME OFAPPLICANT:
tr l\{inor Altcration -
FHONE:
F.
\J.
MAILINC ADDRESS:
PHONE:
H.TTPEOF
u Construction -$200 Constructionofanewbuildine.
Addition -$50 Includes any addition where square footagp is addcd to any rcsidefltial or
couuncrcial buiiding.
$20 includcs minor changes to buildinp and site improvcmcnts. such as,
rcroofing. painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining
walls, ac.
DRB fees are to be paid at the time of submittal. Later. whcn applying for a building permit, please identi$
thc accurate valuation of thc projcct. Thc Town ofVail will adjust the lcc according to the project valuation.
PLEASE SUBMIT THIS APPLIC.{TION. ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO TIIE
DEPART}IENT OF CON{N{UNITY DEVELOPIVIEN'T.75 SOUTH FRONT.\GE ROAD,
VAIL, COLORADO 81657.
(Contact Eaglc Co. Asscssors Officc at 970-328-8W for parcel #)
I
c0Fr
FEgD
i
\
TOWN OFVAIL
Department of Community Deve lopment
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 974479-2452
April I l, 1999
Joan Maher
Fax:476-1046
RE: GRFA remaining on lot 6, Block 2,YailVillage 6'h
725 Forest Rd. (secondary unit only)
Dear Joan:
After review of the file on Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Village 6'h. staff has determined that the GRFA
allocation for the secondary unit remains as follows:
Lot Size:19,427
GRFA:
Allowed Existing Remaining
2351.84 sq. ft.1,675.5 sq. ft.676.34 sq. ft. (includes additional 250)
These figures are based on the total GRFA utilized in the original construction of the residence
(1313.5 sq. ft.) along with an addition done in 1990 of 362 additional sq. ft. A copy of this letter
will be included in the file. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any additional questions.
My number is 479-2369.
Sincerelv.
/l r/. An tr ttt. f tl I 4[/,{/b 1- $z-
Allison C. Ochs
Planner I
Town of Vail
{g *""t"uorn"o
DRB APPLICATION
*****THIS APPLICATION t,lILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
APPLICATI0N DAIE: 04, /62/?A
-
DATE OF DRB |.,IEETIIIG : 04 /TO.ZO
-
$DAPRO2
o s,
INF0RMATI0N IS SUBMITTED*****
I . PRE-APPLICATION I'IEETING:
A pre-application meet'ing with a planning staff member is strongly suggested to determine if any additiona'l information is needed. No application wilI be accepted un'less.it is complete (must lnclude al'l items required by the zoning administralor).It is the applicant's responsibility to make an appointment with thi staff to find out about additional submjttal requirements. Please note that a COMPLETE applica-tion will streamline the_approval process for your project by decreasing th!'number of conditioni of approval that the DRB may stipulate. ALL conditions oi approval must be resolved before a building permit is issued.
B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Address
Legal Oescription Lot Co Elock Z Firins #fi.Ur6
Zon i ng
c. NAME 0F AppLrcANr: cut.trtc+l onE.p\,
Address ?.O.W Z*, ,r'r.
^-
telephone@,f,pg[
D. NAME 0F APPLTCANT'S REPRESENTATTVT: s.JOud,l M. pElgv,tUs
?'o.l4ox zoa U61u a. terephone Qzr- s zub
DRB FEE: The fee will
VALUATION
\
Address
E. NAME OF
Si gnature
F.permit is requested.
$ 0-$ 10,000
$10,001 -$ 50,000
$50,001 -$ 150,000
$150,001 - $ .500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000 $ Over $1,000,000
$ i0.00
$ 2s.00
$ 50.00
$100.00
$200.00
$300.00
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
1. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant must stake the site to indicate property lines and building corners. Trees that will be removed
should also be marked. This work must be completed before the DRB visits the
si te.
2. The review process for NEll BUILDINGS of the Des'ign Review Board, so pl an
3. People who fail to appear before the
meeting and who have not asked for a
republished.
will nornrally involve two separate meetings
on at least two meetings for their approval .
Design Review Board at their scheduled
postponement will be required to be
Address ?0. W Z+U epJU ee - .telephone *1b-S?Db
be paid at the time a bu'ilding
FEE
no
to
4.The following items
They, however, have
longer have to be presented to the Design Review Board.
be presented to the Zoning Administrator for approval:
a. l,llndows, skylights and similar exterior changes that do not alter the
exist'ing plane of the building; and
b. Building additions that are not viewed from any other lot or public space,
which have had letters submitted from adjoining property owners approving
the addition; and/or approval from the agent for, or manager of a condominjum
association.
5. You may be required to conduct Natural Hazard Studies on your property. You should
check with a Town Planner, before proceed'ing.
MATERIAL TO BE SUBMITTED
I. NEt.'l CONSTRUCTION
A. Topographic map and s'ite plan of site containing the following (2 copies):
1. Licensed surveyor's stamp.
2. Contour intervals of not more than 2' unless the parcel consists of 6 acres or
more, in which case, 5t contour interva'l s will be accepted.
3. Existing trees or groups of trees having trunks with diameters of 4" or more
one foot above grade.
4. Rock outcroppings and other significant natural features (large boulders,
intermittent streams, etc. ).
Avalanche areas, 100 year flood plain and slopes 40% or more, if applicable.
Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS landmark or sewer irrvert.
Locations of the following:
a. Proposed surface drainage on and off sjte showing size and type of culverts, swales, €tc.
b. Exact locations of alI utilities to include existing sources and proposed
service lines from sources to the structure. Utilities to include:
5.
6.
7.
cabl e TV
Tel ephone
sewer
water
9as
el ectri c
c. Property lines showing distances and bearings and a basis of bearing
d. Proposed driveways with percent slope and spot elevations
e. Al I easements
8. Existing and finished grades.
9. Al'l existing and proposed improvements including structures, landscaped areas,
service areas, storage areast wa1ks, driveways, off-street parking, loading
areas, retaining walls (with spot elevations), and other site improvements.
10. Elevations of top of roof ridges (with existing grade shown underneath) to
determine height of building.
B. A statement from each utility verifying'l ocation of service and availability. To
be submitted with site plan.
C. Pre'liminary title report to accompany all submittals, to insure property ownership ' and all easements on property.
D. Landscape P'lan (1." = 20' or larger) - 2 copies
1. Show the location of 4" diameter or larger trees, ,other'shraU6s.aRi-iia'ttVe p'lants tha are on the site and the location and design of proposed landscape areas with
the varieties and approximate sizes of plant materials to be planted. I.
2. Complete landscape materials list.
3. Designate trees to be saved and those to be lost.
N0TE: As much of the above information as possible shou'ld occur on the site plan, so that
the inter-relation of the various components is clear. The landscape plan should be
separate. The existing topographic and vegetational characteristics may be a separate
map. The applicant must stake the site to show lot lines and building corners. Trees
that wi'l I be lost during construction must be tagged. The work should be completed
before the DRB site visit.
;E.-. Architectura'l Plans (1/8" = 1' or larger) 2 copies
. l. Must include floor plans and all elevations as they wil'l appear on completion.
Elevations must show both existing and finished grades
2. Exterior surfacing materials and colors shall be specified and submitted for
review on the materials list available from the Department of Conqunity Develop-
ment. Color chips, siding samples etc., should be presented at the Design Review
Board meeting.
F. The Zoning Administrator and/or DRB may require the submission of additional plans,
drawings, specifications, samples and other materia[ (including a mode'l ) if deemed
necessary to determine whether a project wi'l I comply with design guidelines.
II. MINOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS
Photos or sketches that clearly indicate what is proposed and the location (site plan)
of proposal may be submitted in lieu of the more formal requirements given above, as
long as they provide all important specifications for the proposed including colors and
materials to be used.
II. ADDITIONS - RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL
A. Original floor plans with a'll specificatjons shown
B. Floor plan for addjtion - 2 copies
C. Site plan'showing existing and proposed construction - 2 copies topos
D. Elevations of addition
E. Photos of existing structure
F. Specifications for a'll materials and color samp'l es on materials Iist available at
Department of Conrnunity Development
At the request of the Design Review Administrator you may also be required to submit:
G. Statement from each utifity verifying location of service and availability. See
attached utility location verification form.
H. Site improvement survey, stamped by registered professional surveyor.
I. Pre'liminary title report, verifying ownership of property and lists of easements.
IV. FINAL SITE PLAN
After a building pernrit has been issued, and when the project is underuay, the following will be required before any building receives a framing inspection from the Building
Department: A certified improvement survey showing:
A. Building locations with ties to property corners, i.e. distances and angles.
B. Building dimensjons to nearest tenth of foot.
C. All utility service'l ines as-builts showing size of lines, type of material used,
and exact locations. 2 copies
.' D. Drainage as-builts. 2 copies
E. Basis of bearing to tie to section corner.
F. A]l property pins are to be either found or set and stated on map.
G. All easements
H. Building floor elevations and roof ridge e'levations.
LIS TOF
Z
o
dI
MATERIALS
The following information is required for submittal
Board before a final approval can be fiven:
A. BUILDING I'IATERIALS: TYPE OF I,IATERIAL
NAME OF PROJECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF P
Roof
Siding
0ther t,{all Materials
Fasci a
Soffi ts
!li ndows
llindow Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fl ues
Fl ashi ngs
Chi mneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
by the applicant to the Design Review
COLOR
r -t-M'A
B. LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer:
phone:
PLANT I,IATERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
Botanical Name Common Name Quani ty Si ze*
for conifers.
(over)
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED
*Indicate caliper for deciducious trees.Indicate height
. PLANT I*IATERIALS:.. (con't)
SHRUBS
Botanical Name Corrnon Name Si ze
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
GROUND COVERS
Tvpe Square Footage
s0D
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
c. OTHER:LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining wa]ls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) please specify.
It
UTILITY LOCATION VERIFICATION
SUBDIVISION
JOB NA}TE
BLOCK FILING
ADDRESS
The location of utilltles, whether they be maln trunk lines or proposed lines,
must be approved and verlfled by the fol.lowlng utilttles for the accompanyl.ng sl'te plan.
Authorlzed Slgnature Date
Mountain Bell
468-6500
Western Slope Gas Co.
I 800 922-1987
Ilarry Moyes
Publlc Servlce Cornpany
949-578r
Gary Hall
Holy Cross Electlrc Assqc.
949-5892
Ted Husky/Mlchael Laverty
Ilerltage Cablevlsion T.V.
949-5530
Gary Johnson
Upper Eagle Va1ley Water &
Sanltatlon Dlstrlct
476-7480
Fred Haslee
NOTE: These verlflcatlons do not relleve the contractor of his responslbiltty to obtain a atreet cut permlt fron the Town of Vall, Departoent of publlc
works and to obtaln utlllty locatlons before dlgglng 1n any publlc right-
of-way or easement 1n the Town of Vall. A bulldlng pernit is not a street cut permlt. A street cut permit nust be obtalned separately.
This forn ls to verlfy servlce availablllty and locatlon.
Thls ahould be used in conJunctlon wlth preparlng your
utlllty plan and schedullng lnstaLlatlons.
*(Please bring a slte plan when obtalntng Upper Eagle Valley llater
& Sanltatlon signatures)
DATE:
LEGAL DESC
ADDRESS:
Ot,lNER
ARCHITECT
ZONE DISTRICT
PROPOSED USE
LOT SIZE
Height
Total GRFA
Primary GRFA
(30)(33)
4fie
-g 261{.2{ lb71.z
-+ tb74.tS nin,]
t 20, \..--,''
*'
1g'
( 30) ( so)
ptu Vo71 €,1tre.ffi ---82
ZONE CHECK
FOR
SFR, R, R P/S ZONE DISTRICTS
B'f ock L
Al 'lowed
rrins ]aal ()i\^7P
Setbacks: Front
Sides
Rear
llater Course
Site Coverage
Landscapi ng
Fence/ Reta i ni ng l,lal I
Parki ng
Credi ts: Garage
4it*1:e ProPosed
lf'
l9'
w.Wb?*
Hei ghts
Wtm *- ?.O?-b Lq3z.3
T
Is33]lffb
(s0)(@
(zs1(@P
Mechani cal
Ai rl ock
Storage
Solar Heat
Drive: Slope Permitted
Envi ronmental /Hazards :
(200rc@
Slope Actual
Avalanche -4
Flood Plain
Slope -
l.|etl ands
Geologic Hazards
Corments:
Zoning: Approved/Disapproved
taff Signature
I \.-)OAJ/\'- a qb73Fq15
Fron tbc lesh 0f... Lattcn Wotcttort
T15 nd ?e,ol
''PAoc* Z- \czf A, VVbl4fihvq J * c-8^da,-A0wst ,Mf)
htlvv,tc,'ale. ce4= L)
1-' GW trY6nrn\-J
,knvtu*n\
\-/
fica'\ c€F*
x aot^l
\netudn alrd,LLobv- G|-l;k ?l**
add,tlu-r^p Z=O *,
zp+
ffi;+
I
I
I
cj z
F
G,
uJ o-
.+.it
o
rn \f
.t)
LIJ
t'|.
L
=E t!.L
t$$\ $$+ol o\
c.l
2
F)
z H
p
E
P1
('r
qJl\
<rrr
h
Ff
F-]frl E
.F <t
oEi
ba
z
)
i_i
FI z
FIF otz Zltl
FIA <l EIF tz (,t<zl -tz qlo
Elu)Ftv
FEIC).:<OA
!! Fr tr til
Yut
z?
^z 5,-
G.<
2&
<z t.,fr]
L!F
E
F
E F at
==o
4 z o
!,z H
&
<
F
>.
U)
F z r4 E
14
E l-{
c tq -=' llJ .t,
^ lo r; t=sC lE 5: li FE IY
.9E\ IE
E $,\-lF
", .o \ lcc
E$r--l;
:slEr
e b \0='
=E l(/,<
oDc \)
:gR T
H3*^ $.. c v\ \5 5ES-s
;:x€t
.e-E 3 o*
5 'E'-r =.'"r- $
EE ;,o9 Fll
-: I
DO.=l c 6 -,1 t: al ui o <l
EO EI
ot':6 '=o(n *io ;ioc tro(6 c.2.t,.9o 3 ;0c -.= (!
c-o
:e;€'5 =c9G
EsE _'E >,
EEF
eoB Jqr i .Y- 6
o-(! cL
sEE
oP d E*:E;:e:.E
Oc:
EdE
--C (E o'-E;O r-E og-O)(6.C
E:E B6>
ii(U:,!? 6 Bfs 9Eor
P5g
€
.i
\'
(!\o ro
.if rr
tl
rn N Lrl N
o\n
=
=
UJ
o z
Y ()lu
o z
o
E
o
uJ
z 6
J o-
z
o ttl
X
N
(']
Ll'l
UJ t!z
tr
TIJ E
uJ E
c
!o
=t
IJJ E z
6
UJ
F
L
uJ
(L
z
ttl
x
uj o
U'
uJ
Lu
TL
tr
=E
uJ (l-
J
F
F
z
!l
co
a
()lu J ul
z
=
o-
J
o z
I
UJ
=
ts
H
NOT.MtVA
H a
&
z
;.
9H x>zP
Fn !2 *<
i,iz
,!J <ts
zA
U<
=>E
-r.r
(\l
=cow
zz
lro-a Xr 49 0
n,o z>-6Z !L<oo.g8
2
tr
LL (r
ci
o-
uJ
F
o o
or \'
u,E
F t3
J
z
E 6 o
z
tr
e.lu
3
LIJ z
l
L z f z Oa
<(J o<
=P Rtr 6o <z
F z
9<
urO 3tr OI
X X X X
F l
F
z
F
.J
d)
z
Y
l!
-.lI <l
-l
zl
zl
,. >l
u,
UJ
uJ z o F
l!
o-
.J
z o
E o o
uJ f,
E
U'
UJ z Y
i
z
F
5
U)z
c{
(n
.l(
CN
I
O
-),LO /ic..t
4A V"O
)'1
,/z
-?A,'
o\
c'\
ro N
E
IJJ F o (D o -z o
F 0-ul Y
ut o
o t-
F
cc
UJ (L
tl.o
()
I
ut F o z
&
Zta .- O -v)
=E rd a<4
>z-
f:l^JON
O-t!F X}.1 tRtRt--t L-JT--J L -J
"3E
=F3 =t!X dd=
F
tr tu c t!
E<ctl o .1)
B9
YG
5E >Jt-
= lrJ r-E I-=I "iE E
=F E 66 9 iur E XO_t x>€HF cl 'i ar-i !=i;
d)o
ts
=E,
LrJ o-z o
F
C)f E F o z o o
ul F
o
zl
sl
1l
<l >l
r|.l ol
zl
3l g
I
I
I
I
,l
=.1 ol r!l
5l
al >l
t!l
il
=Ol ul FI F
I
I
I
I
I
l'
I
I
I a ul
cl
J>
=()
z t-l
z
FJ
=t tr
I
Fct I
JI
c.t I e\tl
I
el
ull
Crl
JI
<l >l
ttl ol
zl
=l ol FI
H
TA z
z
(A
F
=E
o\
1l1
I
F-
GI
@
tl tl
l'fl |lo, l
| .-{ |l-l tl ..tt Yt ^l cl 2l
ill sl F:I CEI r--rt .l
t<l ,.\l >l dl rrl ol ol tzl g3l
HPI
ttl
c.l
F.
I \o t\
-f
B
z
F)
!.r H Fl
(t
(..
Fl.4 t!
&
FJ
H z H
E
F\
c.)
X
UJ
o o
=
z
H H
H
=
uJ
z
(D
I
I
*l r{l 'l
EI tl Fll
r-{ I ol
H
z
j
t!
z.
't-
UJ
=
o
E ir
=+E
Oz
E
<F (r(J tu<ztr UJF (1 Z
()
E o F
F z
E OO zr-
=#]F 12,rro
F
C)
UJ
E r
tu
J
|Xlnn 'x*-
o.
75 soulh lrontage road
eail. colorado 8't557
(303) 479-21.38 or 479-2139
o f
i
. .! I. r lt'I
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
offlce of communlly developmenl
AI-,L CONTRACTORS CT'RRENTLYL REGISTERED WITIT THE TOT{N OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLTC WoRKS/COMr!ruNITy DEVELOPMENT
IfARCH 16, 1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING & I'{ATERTAIJ SToRAGE
rn summary, ordinance No. 6 states that it is unlawfur for any person to litter, track or deposit any soi1, rock, sand, debri-s or rnaterial , including trash dunpsteri, portable toileti ana---workmen vehicles. upon. any street, siaewaix, ;ii;y or public p1?9" or anv portion theieof. The right-oi-;;t 6n arr Town of Vail streets and.Iga-ds is approxinateiy 5 ft. 6ff pavernent.This ordinance wilr- be strillly enforcid. uy ttre iown of Vai_r Pr,rbric works Department. persons found vi;laain; tnis orairurr""Iill- be given a 24 hour written--notice to remove-said naterial .rn the event the person so notified does not compry wiin ah;---notice within the 24 hour time specified, ah"-il;r.ic works Departrnent will remove said urate-riat -at trr" "xp."se of person notified- The provi.sions of this ordinance rrriri not be apprrcabre to construction, naintenance or repair projects of any street or alLey or any utilities in the righi_._ruy.
To review ordinance No- e in fur1, prease stop by the Town of vaiL Building Departnent to obtain a copy. riani< you for your cooperation on this natter.
lili
Position/Re1 ationship to Project (i.e. contractor, owner)
fcl
H
FT
F)
tt7
IH
lo
I
I
I
I
I
I
t...,
r(J
IE zl )
rE I I
t!
tr o
'r
t!
o
F z o o
E,o
E ul z 3 od
|! IJJ a\z ;=u,l i Ev fuJ
<F
<h
3
F
Iu
-Jl <l trl
zl
zl
o
uJ o
UJ
uJ z
U)F
ul (L
a z
e
=o o
=>a
--Etu
=(D
z tr^
</', o ir oz tL<
qV
FO
.j6i
ll tl
l'l ; lHl N l.l : t5l .'td
I
EEI I
3o- |< xHl d z<l t ool 6 tr.+ lca
3< lts *s le-r qF l8 <zl EZIIA
EEIE
E
o-
E
z
E o
I
J N N c4l cl
1
ct z
E
=E
uJ I
oo
@ o\
e !l A d rtl
F.,l
u,
o
IJJ
=(t)
dl o -z o
F .L
llJ Y
lIJ
@
o F t
cr
UJ IL
t!o
L o o
I
u.t F o z
z ,to
=<(I]o >z
o- u-
.-i5
=E=-\-iUJ cod>
D<N|FlT-I
'...lJt'<U
n!
F
(r ul c
o
ul o z
J
:
a
JF L!-h='i(r dur >(L OrL oo \ur 6(L :>|. t-lrJ
IL
u,
d)o F
c o
E
o o
o
'E
t
E
E o IJ \E
=l +.
aE|D
-F EE
-cL :c'.:!
F
=E.
lrJ G z o F
C)
:)E F
an z o o
lr-
tl tl II tl tl tol tll tol I lrJl
lEl lJl t<l l>l I LLI lol tzl ex
I
I
"l =.1 ol ull
5l
al >l
AI
it ,ol uj FI F
N \o r^
I F\
N
I
z
i
llt
J
a
tt o
2 3 o F
ts
Fl E]
H
z &
ac
X E F €
tr
ll tl lt tl
l?l tol
t5 t>l
lbl tzl
=|3l E9t rr-l Fl
I
I
I
I
.l
=.1 ol
uJl
ccl
JI
<l >l
rLl ol
zl
=l ol FI
F
tl
tl llE
ll
td td tcI t<
=t J flg;
H a
rrl H
Fl E
ui
=z
m
-t
z
T
uJ
=
E ir
=*t o2
O
oo z, t-
=#)z u-o
O
t -:o <F (r(J uJ<zE
I,IJ F (42 -o -o
I
ul J
!
.i z
E
=E ut I
o o o
r\
Or (\I
o o o
(\t
c c c
(c
L,IJ
LIJ
LL
E
ul (L
fh\s
i
N
Nd
N
o
t
F
F I z
=o
z z
UJ
z
z z
r":-+
_<c..
-,9
;;<!.r dtr-Z J1 Z - <
=<a7-=zz=::oi xFFc
"i:1 o:::,
;<a i!c ).
<o:'
a<::
c
I.r:
t.c o o
rr,N
N Or sf
o o
fr,
@ c (a
o o
O!sf
o c)
o
o
o o (\t
1r)(\l
<$
rr:
(\
F
=
z
o
3
:<
uJ
()z
E.
(J
uJ
ul
z
l
o-
J
z
I
2
uJ
uJ IL z o tr
llJ
E
o E
3
;
E z
6
ts
o o lu
f z
U'
UJ
K t
=E,
L!
J
F
(,z
6
l c]
J
9 E F
z
a
=l J o-
J
I z
I
UJ
NOtrvn'lvA
:;6
=lDN
zz
io- a Xr Eg o
<ho z>.o(J QZ r.r_ <oaL ',. ]d9
-iN
z
tr
l
.i,
o-l
uJ
o
rtt N
(Y)
a o-
Lri E
z
E o
z
F-
E
UJ F
*
;
UJ z
tttttl )||l 2sg ? E 5 F 6-it,p-o,938 d!tr FErieA 6 <rCD(rcDz)td | | I I r8t | | r I
F\J ? 9- o=z A =r : 3 F
st=H55 ooorz<)
z I F
=U)z
l
?E
o Ctr (n
F
UJ -r
><
ii
(,
lu
o
B
E
i
t I o
2
F
=
z
ur o-
z Y
9 -F
(c
u
af,r!
-(o
v,
.d
=Or
UI v,r!
o N
cr)
(f)
(f)
t
UJ
o-
F
!o
q-
cn L (U
-o
q-
L
o)
(F
3 q<H=o
--rF=
r-(c
c.-
o z
F (J
UJ -)o
L
I ,-rl
?l col
c\t I rl +l
I
uJ F
o
ts
=E lrl o-
-)z
z
zz
cft o >z
o.l!
."i5
==?dd=
trt]D
=
uJ
o_
UJ .L
F
o
o
{,
ct
E
E o
o
3t EI ol ol
1l
al
=l
r c
=o
E o c
a
tl tl tl il
II lal t3l tdi tol tol t<l >l rl 4al trl >l
ll )l ql
I +ll ql
:l r.i I fll .4 I
ot I qt
II ql otl v\ |
Et fl ot ;l 6l ;l tol t<l >l -rl El <l trt =l
{r o o
--J
sl .FI \ol
rl
El
=I =l
'-l
El
z -tr
6
F
x (u
o-
o E
IE (J
u.J
z
:'
l
I L
l"
I
J
H
5I <l
--t >-<F E(J
I
I It ld
I
I
I
I
A ui'
LI]l
q
--l
=()
&ir
=+E oz
t oo zl
=<ZE ]F JZ o-O
E
F ()
E F z o
z
I
LLt
<F
ul<zE
<o OF
:<
=2
E
t'l.J z 3
<O an lo
z I F
C)
E,F
CN z o ()
8AD
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
vArL, co 81657
97 0-419-2138
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBS ITE
Permi-t PLUMBING PERMIT
AT
tl .
ALL TIMES
P 9 6-018 B
APPLICANT CONCEPT MECHANICAL, INC
41344 u.S. HWY 6 & 24 WESTI BLDG E,
CONTRACTOR CONCEPT MECHANICAL, INC
4L348 U.S. HWY 6 E 24 WEST, BLDG E/OWNER MAHER JERRY & JOAN
25L FOWLER RD, FAR HILLS N.J. 0?931
Description: PLUMBING FOR NEW KITCHEN
Phone: 97O9490200
UNIT 4, AVON, CO 81,620
Phone l 9709490200
uNrT 4, AVON, CO 81620
Phone: 908-234-2578
Valuation:
Job Address
Location. . .ParceI No. .Project No.
725 FOREST RD
725 FOREST RD
2IO1-O'72-10-010
PRJ96-0192
.00
40.50
Status. . .Applied..
Issued. . .
Expires. .
Totat Catcutated Fees--->
Additionat Fees--------->
TotaI Pernit Fee-------->
Pavments-------
I SSUED
1r/07/Lee6
L\/04/7ee6
os /o3 / teeT
1, 500.00
*****************i***********t*****:ht************iii******* FEE SUtttlARY *******************************************1-r*************
P Lumbi ng----->
PLan check--->
Investigation>
Hi l, L Ca L l.---->
Restuarant P lan Revi ev-->
TOTAL FEES----_
10.00
7.50
.00
3 .00
40.50
.00
/.0. 5 0
40. 50
DCpt: BUILDING Division:
Dept! FIRE Division:
*************************************************************************************t***********t********************************
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. FIELD TNSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
*************************t*****************************i************************************************************ff************
DECLARATIONS
Item: .05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT II/04/1996 CHUCK Action: AppR Item:' 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT Ll/04/I996 CHUCK Action: AppR
I hereby acknolrtedge that I have read.this application, til,l.ed out in fuLl. the information required, compteted an ptan, and state that att the information provided as requi red is correct. I agree to compty r^i.ith tire iniormation to conpty lrith al'l' Tovn ordinances,and state [aws, and to buitd this structure according tothe Tovn's zoning and codes, design review approved, tln'iform Euil.ding code and other ordinances of the Town a[pticabte thereto.
accurate p lot
and p[ot p [an,
subdivision
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE }IADE TI.IENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 472-?138 qN AT OUR OFFICE FROI.I
TOWN OF VAII,
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
vArL, co 8L657
97 0-479-2t38
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
\IUtt( 6
1i'.,-z
ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit +: 896-0345
-pL
l',.li'L
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED
eoo/er-,t sFR BUrLD PERMTT
Job Address
Location. . .
Parcef No..
Project No.
725 FOREST RD
725 FOREST RD
2t0L-072-L0-010
PRJg6-0192
Status...: APPRO\rED
Applied..: LL/0L/t996 riiuea...: LL/04/L9e6
Expires. . : 05/03/199'7
Phone: 3038275924
Phone r 3038275924
Phone z 908-234-2578
#of l,ood/Pa l' I'et:
APPLICANt MINICK CONSTRUCTION
P o Box 4018, VAIL CO 81658
CONTRACTOR MINICK CONSTRUCTION
P O BOX 4018/ vArL CO 81658
OWNER MAHER JERRY & JOAN
251 FOWLER RD, FAR HILLS N.J. 07931
Description:
REMOVE AND REPLACE STAIRS' NEW KITCHEN
Occupancy: R3 Single Family Residence
Type Conitruction: V N Type V ltlon-Rated
Valuation:
FireDtace Infofmation: Restricted:
25 ,"1 00 Add Sq Ft :
fof Gas Appl'iances:#Of Gas Logs:
****r.*****ffiffiffi***ffi FEE suf4ttARy ffi*lr**ffi!wr********ffi***Jrjd$tlt*******'r***t****ftt
Bui [ding----> 322.@ Restuarant Pl,an Revieu--> -oo Totat caLcutated Fees---) 814-30
PLan Check---> 209'30 DRB Fee-------------- --> 5O'OO Additionat Fees--------> -O0
Investigation> .oo Recreation Fee----------> .oo Total Pernit Fee--------] 65/''30
Uil.l, catl,----> 3.OO cLean-up Depos r t--------> 250'oo Payments------------a -0o
TOTAL FEES-----
ffi *r*****r*ffi *ffi tr,c|t*rd.tlt****,r,r**********i**M
Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT - -^ -P9PFi-BUILDING Division:
i17(ii/bA6'-cFARLTE- -AaEion, NorE PLANS ro cHARLTE
11'/04'/.1996 cHUcK Action: APPR
17'/04'/1s96 cii[eii Actioni Appn oK PER L.w STGNED-qqE-.-- -.i€6;i'6sa5o-itili..iur1.re -onFafliptiillt---- - -- -Dept: PIANNTNG Dlvrs:-on:
iif/ni /.7t A 6- cirEif,ie- -+cEion i--tloin ereryq- r9 LAUREN? ? ? - --ii'/oAnsei; eii-tt-CK-- Aqgj-qqi APFR OK PER L.w. STGNED oFF
i[Air;,0sooO-i;inil' oepAR1t4niit Dept: FIRE Divr-sr-on:
lI7ni/]9gfj-cHARLTE Acqion: APPR N/A nrrr.r r.raotz r\.i ruem:' ossdo-iitib'ilie wijnxs---' " --',: Dept: PUB woRK Division:
ii'tiiitIiSFi-ciIARLiE Ac-tion: APPR N/A
***Jrdit*fflnt*trJr*rntietffirtnHnt**i*Jdr*******ffi**JriJ*tr*ffiirr*JrffQt**ffi*trthtdr**trffi*tr*J.J**irffr***frM
see Page 2 of this Document for any conditions that rnay apply to this permit'
DECLARATIONS
r hereby ackmHtedge that r have read this appL'ication, fitted out in futl' the information requi red, conPteted an accurate ptot
p[an/ and state that al,t, the infonmat,ion pro;ided as rlquired is correct. .I agree to comply t{ith the information and plot ptan/
to compl,y vith al,[ To0rn ordinances and state [avs, and io buil,d this structure according to'the Town's zoning and suHivision
codes, design revieH approved, uniform Bui[din9 code and other ordinances of the Toun appLicabl'e thereto'
REouEsrs FoR llspEcrroNs SHALL BE nADE TuENTy-Fot R HouRs IN ADvANcE BY TELEPHoNE AT 479-?138 oR AT ouR oFFIcE FRoll 6:00 Ail 5:00 Plt
Send Ctean-UP Deposit To: I4INICK CONSTRUCT;SIGNATURE oi I on coNTRAcroR FoR HlllsELF AilD ol'NER
Page 2
***************************************i****************************************
CONDITIONS
Permit #: 896-0345 ""-"t i/04/.?9. status---: APPROVED
*******************************************i************************************
permit rype: ADD/ALT sFR BurLD PERMTT Applied--z rr/0l/1996
Applicanr--: urniCK CoNSTRUCTIoN r-siued--:t ll/04/L996
3038275924 To Expire ' o5/03/L997
Job Address: 725 FOREST RD
Location---: 725 FOREST RD
Parcel No--: 2LO1-072-10-010
Description:
REMOVE AND REPLACE STAIRS' NEW KITCHEN
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * COnditiong * * * * * * rt * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I.FIELDINSPECTIoNSAREREQUIREDTocHEcKFoRcoDECoMPI-,IANCE.
2. SMOKE DETEcToRs ARE REQUiRED rN ALL BEDROOMS AND EVERY sToRY
AS PER SEC.121O OF THE 1991 UBC.
3.AsTRUcTuRALENG.MAYBEREQUIREDToAPPRoVESTRUCTURALCHAN
GES.4. STAIRS, HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH
THE 1991 UBC.
5. IF FIREPLACE IS REPACED IT MUST BE GAS.
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD vArL, co 81657
9t 0-479-2138
8ui Ldi ng-----)
P lan Check--->
Invest i gat ion>
tlil.L catt---->
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED
ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT
ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit. #: B96-0345
APPLICANT MINICK CONSTRUCTION
P O BOX 4018, VArL CO 81658
CONTRACTOR MINICK CONSTRUCTION
P O BOX 4018, VAIL CO 81658
OWNER MAHER JERRY & JOAN
251 FOWLER RD, FAR HrLLS N.J. 07931
DescrJ-ption:
REMOVE AND REPLACE STAIRS, NEW KITCHEN
Occupancy: R3 Single Fam.ily Residence
Type Construction: V N Type V Non-Rated
Job Address
Localion. . .
Parcel No..Project No.
725 FOREST RD
725 FOREST RD
21,0I-07 2-L0 - 0 I 0
PRJ9 6 -019 2
Status . . .
Applied..
Issued. . .
Expires. .
I S SUED
|t/01/Lee6 rr/ o4 / l-se 6
05/03/ree7
834.30
.oo
834 -30
Phone: 3O38275924
Phone:. 3038275924
Phone:908-234-2578
Valuation:25,7OO Add Sq Ft:
F i reptace lnformation: Restricted:#ot 6as App t iances:fof Gas Logs:#of Uood/Pa l. Let :
********************************fi***************ff******** FEE SUlll.lARy *****t***********t***************************************
322.OO nestuarant P Lan Review-->?O9.3O DRB Fee--------.00 Recreation Fee---------->3-00 Ctean-Up Deposi t-------->
.00 Tota I CaIcutated Fees--->50.00 AdditionaL Fees--------->.00 Tota L Pernit Fee-------->250.00 Payments > 834.30
***********************r***************ll]ll*l5li;;;;;;;;;;;iiii**********li*;il-*****llliXff-lli;;;;*ii**ii***********i?!***
IIE.M: .O51qO BUILDING DEPARTMENT DEPI: BUILDING DiViSiON:!!/.QL/,r996 CHARLTE ect:_onl Nbfe pr,eNs ro cHAFiin-----7I'/.04'/L996 CHUCK action: AFFn U'/o4'/I99Q_cgqq{ Acrj_onr AppR oK pER L.w SIGNED OFF Ilelni'.0s4q0 PLANNTNG DEPARTMENT - nept-j-Fr,LirirrNe Division:I!/,Q\/.Le-96, qHARLTE Aaaiona--Noie pr,aNs ro LEUFEN?i1"-'-'--'- "'
LL'/04'/L996, CryqqK Acrion: AppR Or Den-r.,.wl-SrGNen oF,r Ilern!'.056Q0_EIBE_DEPARTMENT . -- -'. oe[ii"FInE^- Di_vision:!!/0I/\226 CHARLTE Acaiont AppR N/A Ils{tj-,959q0-PUEI,Iq woRKS ,^_^ --',_ Depr: puB woRK Division:77/01,/1996 CHARLIE Action: AppR N/A
***********************************ff********************************#*******Jr*********ff*irt****************rrt****ffi**ffi*******
see Page 2 of this Document for any condit,ions that may apply to this permit.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowtedge that I have fead this apptication, f itl,ed out in fuLl. the infonmation required, cornpteted an
PLan/ and state that att the information provided as requifed is correct. I agree to compLy uith tire information to compty t{ith aLl' Tolrn ordinances and state laus, and to buiLd this structure according to'the Town,s zon.ing ana codes, design review approved, uniforn Buil.ding code and other ordinances of the Town appl.,icabLe thereto.
accurate ptot
and plot p [an,
subdi vi sion
REaUESTS toR TNSPECTIONS SHALL BE I4ADE TUENTY-FOUR HOURS rN AoVANCE By TELEPHONE At 479-2^138 oR AI olJR OFFICE FROII
o
ON
Permit Type: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMTT Applicant-- : MINICK CONSTRUCTION
3038275924
Job Address: 725 FOREST RD Location---: 725 FOREST RD Parcel No--: 2L0L-072-10-010
Send C lean-Up Deposit To: ilINlCK CONSTRUCTI
Page 2 ********************************************************************************
CONDITIONS Permit #: 896-0345 as of 77/08/96 Status---: ISSUED ***************************************************rr****************************
o
SIGNATURE OF OIINER OR CONTRACTOR fOR HII.ISELF AND OI.INER
Applied-- | It/ot/1.ee6
Issued--- t LL/04/1996
To Expirer 05/03/L997
Description:
REMOVE AND REPLACE STAIRS, NEW KITCHEN
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * COnditiOnS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.2. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED IN ALL BEDROOMS AND EVERY STORY
AS PER SEC.121O OF THE 1991 UBC.3. A STRUCTURAL ENG. MAY BE REQUIRED TO APPROVE STRUCTURAL CHAN
GES.
4. STAIRS, HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH
THE 1991 UBC.
5. IF FIREPLACE IS REPACED IT MUST BE GAS.
****************************************************************
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statemnt ****************************************************************
Statemnt Number: REC-0230 Amount: 834.30 1,I/08/96 L1:36
Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #6628 Init: CD
permir No: 896-0345 Type: A-BUILD ADD/ALT SFR BUILD pE
Parcel No: 21OL-072-10-010 Site Address: 725 FOREST RD
Location t 725 FOREST RD
Total Fees: 834.30 This Payment 834.30 Total ALL pmts: 834.30 Balance: .00 ****************************************************************
Account Code Description Amount 01 OOOO 41310 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 322.00 01 OOOO 41331 DESIGN REVIEW FEES 5O.OO 01 OOOO 4L332 PLAN CHECK FEES 209.30 01 0000 22002 CLEANUP DEPOSTTS 250.00 01 OOOO 41336 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.OO
o
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
725 FOREST RD
725 FOREST RD
2IOr-O72-r0-010
PRJ9 6-019 2
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
97 0-47 9-2138
E Iectri ca [--->
DRB Fee
Invest i gat ion>
Ui tL ca l. L---->
JOBSITE AT AtL TIMES
Permit #: E96-0282
Job Address
Location. . .
Parcel No. .
Project No.
Status. . .
AppIied..Issued...
Expires. .
Phone: 30382
I S SUED n/or/7es6
rr/04 /7ee6 05/03/Lee7
?5918 APPLICANT OLD ELECTRIC
P O BOX 490, MINTURN CO 81645
CONTRACTOR OLD ELECTRIC
P O BOX 490, MINTURN CO 81645 OWNER MAHER JERRY & JOAN
251 FOWLER RD, FAR HrLLS N.J. 07931
Description: ELECTRICAL FOR NEW KITCHEN
Phone: 3038275918
Phone z 9O8-234-2578
Val-uation:4,200.00
*************ff*****************************t*************i FEE SUll14ARY ********i*t***************f****Jr*t**t*********************
90. o0
.00
.00
3.00
TorAL FEES---> 93.00
TotaI CaLcutated Fees--->
AdditionaI tees--------->
TotaL Permit Fee-------->
Payments
93-00
.00
93. O0 > 93.00
BALANCE DUE-----
******i****************i*****lt't*****************************t***************************************ff*ir**************ff**********
Dept: BUILDING Division:
Dept: FIRE Divi s ion :
***************************************************************************************************************************t******
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
*********ir****************,t*********ff**********t********Jcl***************f***************************ffi****lt*********************
DECLARATIONS
l.hereby acknowtedge that I have read this apptication, fitted out in fuLt the information required, compl,eted an accurate ptot ptan, and state that atl the information provided as required-is correct. r agree to compl,y }rith the infofmation and pt,ot pt,an/to comply with atl Town ordinances and state [aws, and to buitd this structure according io-the Town,s zoning and subdivision codes/ design review approved, uniforn Buitding code and other ordinances of the Town appLicabte thereto.
REOUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE I'IAOE TIIENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE Af 179-?138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROI4 E:OO A 5:OO PI.1
Item: .06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT II/04/1996 CHUCK Action: APpR ITEm:,-O56OO FIRE DEPARTMENT 17/04/1996 CHUCK Action: APpR
S IGNATURE
****************************************************************
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statemnt
*****rk**********************************************************
Statemnt Number: REC-0230 Amountz 93.00 11/08/sa tt:ls
Payment Method: CHECK Notationt *6628 Initi CD
Permit No: 896-0282 Type: B-ELEC ELECTRICAL PERMIT Parcel No: 27Ot-072-70-010 Sit.e Address: 725 FOREST RD tocationt 725 FOREST RD Total Fees: 93.00 This Payment 93.00 Total ALL Pmts: 93.00 Balance: .00 ****************************************************************
Account Code Description Amount 01 OOOO 413].3 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 9O.OO 01 OOOO 41336 WILL CALL INSPECT]ON FEE 3.OO
o
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE
Permit PLUMBING PERMIT
Job Address Location...
ParceL No..Project No.
APPLICANT CONCEPT MECHANICAL, INC
41348 u.S. HIVY 6 & 24 WEST, BLDG E,
CoNTRACTOR CONCEPT MECHANICAL/ INC
41348 u.S. HwY 6 e 24 WEST/ BLDG E,OWNER MAHER JERRY & JOAN
251 FOWLER RD, FAR HrLLS N.J. 07931
Description: PLUMBING FOR NEW KITCHEN
PLumbing-----) 30.00
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
vAIL, CO 81657
97 0-47 9-2138
AT ALL TIMES
P 9 6-018 8 lt.
725 FOREST RD
725 FOREST RD
2107-07 2-L0 -0 L 0
PRJg6-0192
Status. . .
AppJ.ied. .
Issued...
Expires. .
I S SUED
1r /07 / rse 6 I!/a4/ree6
05 / 03 /ree7
Phone: 9709490200
UNIT 4, AVON, CO 81620
Phone: 9709490200
uNrT 4, AVON, CO 81620
Phone:908-234-2578
Val-uation:1,500.00
**************t************ir***t*********Jr't**rc*******t***** FEE SUfil.lARy *****t**********************i**t****ff*rr******************
P[an Check--->
Investigation>
UitL CaLt---->
.00
40.50
40.50
.00
40.50
40.50
7 .50
.00
3.00
Restuarant Ptan Revi er.r-->
TOTAL fEES-----
TotaI Catculated Fees--->
AdditionaI Fees--------->
Totat Permit Fee-------->
Dept: BUILDING Divisiont
Dept: FIRE Division:
Paymen
Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT lL/04/1996 CHUCK Action: AppR It€rn:' 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT 7L/04/L996 cHUcK Action: AppR
*****************************************************t**it****************rr***********ff********tr*************************rt******
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
**i*i**************************************************'(*********ff*************************i***i***************l*****************
DECLARATIONS
l.hereby acknowtedge that I have read.this application, fiLted out in futl, the information required, completed an accurate ptot pLan, and state that atI the information provided as required is correct- I agree to conpty iith the information and p1ot il.an,to compty with aLL Town ordinances and state Lar.rs, and to buil.d this structure according io'the Town,s zonin! anO subdivision codes, design revie|l approved, Uniforn Buil,ding code and other ordinances of the Town appLicabl,e thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE IIADE TI.IENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE By TELEPHONE AI 172-213g qn AT ouR otFIcE FROII
****************************************************************
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statemnt
*****************************************************!k**********
Statemnt Number: REC-0230 Amount:
Payment Method: CK Notation. #6628
40.50 LL/OB/96 11 :35 Init: cD
P96-0188 Type: B-PLMB PLUMBING PERMTT 2t0I-072-10-010
725 FOREST RD
725 FOREST RD Total Fees:40.50 Total ALL Pmts:
Balance:
* * ** * * t **** * * * *** ****** * ** ** * * * *** * * *** * ********** ****** * * * * * * **
Permit No3 Parcel Nol Site Address:
Location:
This Payment
Account Code 01 0000 41311
01 0000 41332
01 0000 41336
Description
PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
PLAN CHECK FEES
WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE
40. 50
40.50
nn
Amount
30. 00
7.50
3.00
t
PIANNING AND ENVIRON!.IENTAIJ
l{arch 19, 1990 ltinutes
Present
Chuck Crist
Diana Donovan
Connie Knight Jin Shearer
Kathy Warren
Dalton Willians
Absent
Ludwig Kurz
cot'tMlssIoN
Staff Kristan Pritz
Tom Braun uike lilollica Shelly Mello
Penny Perry
Then Planning and Environmental coumission meeting was called to order at 3:30 p.n. by Diana Donovan, Chairperson.
Item No. 1: Approval of minutes for ltlarch 12, 1990 meetinct.
Motion for anproval of minutes as written was made bv Kathv Warren and seconded bv Chuck Crist.
VOTE: 5 - O IN FAVOR WITH CONNIE KNTGHT NOT YET PRESENT
Item No. 2: A recruest for an exterior alteration to the Vailcrlo Lodge on a portion of Lot 1 Block 2. Vail
Lionshead Third FiLing.Applicant: Craig Holzfaster
Tom Braun presented the proposal explaining that this iten was initially presented to the Planning Connission on February 12,1990. At that ureeting, the Planning Comrnission was supportive of the proposed entry vestibules and porte cochere, but requested that the applicant incorporate landscape inprovenents along the north side of the property and that the existing trash dumpster be screened or enclosed. The proposal was tabled to allow the applicant an opportunity to study these requests. There have
been no changes proposed to the original application.
Initially, the staff recommended approval of this request with the condition that the proposed landscape plan be revised to include improvernents to the berm between the Vailglo parking lot
and the South Frontage Road. The staff still maintains that relocating this landscaping to the bern between the Vaitglo parking lot and the South Frontage Road would greatly inprove the
appearance of the property.
,!
t The staff supports the Pl-anning Cornrnissionrs direction regarding
the screening or enclosure of ttre dunpster and landscape
improvenents along the Frontage Road. The Design Review
Guidelines require dumpsters to be enclosed, and it has been
standard practice to reguire dumpsters on existing buildings to
be addressed as a part of any addition or remodeling. Requesting
the applicant to provide site inprovenents as a part of this
proposal is both reasonable and consistent with other requests,with the conditions that:
1. The existing dunpster be relocated, and/ot screen
from view.
2. Landscape improvenents to the area between the
parking lot and the t{est Frontage Road be irnproved
beyond what is shown on current plans.
Kirk Aker, representative for the applicant, stated that all the
changes proposed are on Vailglors property. As he remeurbered,staff and the Conmission had no problern with the structural
changes. They would be willing to relocate the dumpster to an
enclosed area in the parking area or Purchase a compactor for the
parking area.
Jin Shearer had no comments.
Kathy Warren asked if the removal of the dumpster could be a
condition of approval . Aker replied, rrYesrr.
Kathy then asked the staff if landscaping along the highway could
be done. Torn replied it could. It was a matter of coordination
with the highway department.
Kathy asked how far the paved parking lot was fron the highway.
Eon replied approximatelY 501
Kathy then asked Kirk Aker if they were planning to landscape on
the Ligtrway side. Kirk replied that he felt it lras unreasonable
of the Cornmission to ask them to landscape so far away from the
proposed improvements. Kathy then responded tbat she felt the
money would be better spent on the highway side rather than lthere
the landscaping was ProPosed.
Hugh l{arder, Council for the applicant, stated that the problem
is that the Vailglo can not guarantee anything. They would first
have to satisfy the PEc and then the Highway Department.
Kristan Pritz suggested a compromise of landscaping the Planter
area where snow is currently plowed toward the Northwest corner.
a
Craig Holzfaster, the applicant, replied that he could do tbis if
the landscaping was back by the wall so as to avoid killing it
during the winter months with plowed snow.
Chuck Crist asked what tlpe of foliage was proposed on the
current p1ans. Kirk Aker replied that the bulk was 3 Spruce
trees. Chuck continued by asking about the cropped trees.
tfhether they would continue to be cropped as they grew.
Diana asked if these trees would be affected. Kirk Aker replied
no.
Diana asked if the post on the outside edge would just be in the grass. Kirk replied that was correct. Nothing else would be
disturbed.
Diana continued to state that she was happy that they decided
they would do something wlth ttre dumpster. Alsor.as far as
berrring, if they were to bern the property line, it would help
disting"uish property lines. As it is now, they are not
distingalishable. This should encourage the applicant to do so.
Kathy Warren asked if Kristanrs suggestion of landscaping the
corner area could be a condition. Kirk Aker replied yes.
Motion for approval per the staff nemo with the following
conditions was made bv Kathv Warren and seconded bv Chuck
Crist:
L. Dumpster be rehoved.
2. Landscape the Northwest corner
VOTE: 5 - O IN FAVOR WITH CONNTE KNIGHT NOT YET PRESENT
ftem No. 33 A request for a side setback Yafiance for Lot 6,
Block 2, vail village Sixth Filinq.
APPlicant: Clinton G. Ames, Jr.
shelly Mello presented the project explaining that the applicant
is requesting- a variance frorn the side setback requilgln9nt to . -allow-tlre construction of a 13 1 x L2r6tr two story addition on the
west side of the existing structure. The applicant's proposal is
to add 288 sq ft of additional GRFA to the unit which will
subsequently encroach into the 15r side setback-
shelly continued stating that approval would be a grant
specilt privilege. Staffrs reconmendation is for denial of the
requested 3 foot encroachnent into the side setback. The staff
fe6ts that the applicant has not fully investigated all possible
alternatives that-would not require a variance. t{ithout being
able to identify a true physical hardship which would liutit the
location of the proposed addition, the staff is unable to support
the applicantrs request.
John Perkins, architect representing the applicant, stated that
he hopes to convince the staff and the Cornmission that indeed
there is a hardship. Ile was the original architect on the hone.
He explained that the New England Architecture used on the home
must stay clear and sinple. The location of the proposed roof
needs to be located where it is due to the architectural style.
Any offset becoroes difficult architecturally as well as virtually
inpossible for interior space and furniture placement.
The area to the South is very steep with an 8r plus transition.
Building in this area would put the new structure sithin 4: of
the existing structure and possibly affect the footing. Drainage
sould also be a problen. They feel that the proposed location is
the best possible. There are hardships.
John continued quoting criteria #A-2 nThe degree to which relief
frorn the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a
specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and
unifornity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain
the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege.rl
He believed this is what he had just pointed out.
Quoting the Findings *c-l rrThe strict interpretation or
enforcenent of the specified regulation would deprive the
applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties
in the same district.rr, ilohn stated a precedence that he felt was
set approxinately one year ago on the Acketman project. He was
the architect on this project and they received approval. He
felt the only difference between the two projects was that the
Ackerman project had decks that were already in the setback.
Mr. Perkins betieved that approval tras ltarranted according to the
criteria and finding just guoted. He asked that the Com:nission
review the personal letter from ltr. Ames carefully.
ltr. Ames then addressed the Connission. He expJ.ained that he
purchased the hone 5 to 6 years ago as a rental property. At
that tirne, the size of the rooms was of no consequence. Now that
he has retired, the rooms are too small for a second hone. He
would like to make the hone nore rrlivabler!. l'tr. Ames reiterate
what they felt to be physical hardships to the South including
the steep grade and closeness of the property line to the
adjacent-Uuifaing. He stated that the roorn has to 9o where it
was proposed. He then passed around photographs.
Dalton Williarns asked how much the encroachment was?
John Perkins replied 3 | at the most extreme point.
Dalton then cornnented that if the room was blocked off it would
stiLl be 12x9. llr. Perkins answered that with closets etc., the
bedroon would be 7x9. This does not make sense for a house of
this stature.
Kathy warren suggested that they offset with a deck to allow for
a roof pitch change. .]ohn stated that his a 9r dimension into a
bedroom did not make sense. Kathy stated that she sees a
solution without a variance. Architectural problems is not a
hardship for a variance. John said that a 9x1O bedroon is a
hardship.
Dalton suggested that he move the closets. John stated that this
would still sreate a small room.
Kathy warren continued, stating that the precedence that John had
mentioned earlier did indeed have a hardship. The steepness of
the hill was much greater than in this case. She doesnrt see a
hardship here. John feels that the same situation applies here.
Kathy stated that there were other alternatives.
Jim Shearer wished to clarify Johnrs statement referencing the
roof c1ip. He asked if this would be the case if they moved the
closets South. John stated that it would create a 8rx6 I room and
this was a hardship.
Chuck Crist asked where the property line was and John Perkins
demonstrated on the site plat. There are 6 different parcels
that jog back and forth. It is very complicated.
Alice Parsons from the audience, an adjacent property owner,
stated that she hopes the board will deny this reguest for 2
reasons. First, the property is border to border already-
second, her view was shoitened after !1r. Ames added bay windows.
This addition would aIl. but finish her view. She felt that
property tines were put in place for a reason, and asked the
board not to set a precedence.
John Perkins closed by stating that they were sinply asking for a
L7.25 sq. ft. variance. He has thoroughly researched the
alternatives and feels the slope and room dinensions should be
considered a hardship for a variance.
Diana Donovan explained that she syrnpathizes with ltr. Ames.
However, there il a solution within the styJ.e and architecture.
The board has tried to point some of these alternative out to
John, though it is not their position to do so.
A motion for denial as per the staff nemo was made bv Kathv
I{arren and seconded Jim Shearer.
Dalton stated that he would like to help then out. However, he
felt they needed to place the addition within the linits of
zoning.
VOTE: 5 - O FOR DENTAL WITH CONNIE KNIGHT NOT YET PRESENT
' Item No. 43 A recruest for a conditional use pernit to e:Crand a
proposed parkinq structure for the vail vallev
l,tedical Center of Lots E and F, Vail Villaoe 2nd Filinq at 181 West Ueadow Drive.Applicant: vail vallev l.tedical center.
Iten No. 5:
CONNIE KNIGHT JOINED THE COUI.fiSSION AT 4:2O DURING STAFFTS
PFESENTATION.
Tom Braun presented the proposal explaining ttrat there are 4 main
elements as follows:
The proposal would result in 3 condors
The enclosure of the patio area in the sane manner of
the existing deck.
A new dining deck along l{ill Creek with Rekord Doors.
a public vallmay.
A recnrest for an exterior alteration, stream
setback variance, view corridor amendment, site
coveraqe variance, and conditional use for a qeck
enclosure and new outdoor oatio for the Red Lion
This proposal entails the revielt and approval of five separate
reque-sts-by the Planning Commission. These requests include the
following:
A notion to tab}e this itern was nade by Jirn Shearer and
seconded bv Chuck Crist.
VOTE: 5 - O IN FAVOR OF TABLING WITH CONNIE KNIGITT NOT YET
PRESENT
1. Exterior alteration.
2. A Btream setback variance for a small building
addition, dining patio, and pubJ-ic walkway.
3. A site coverage variance for a snall building addition
and the new dining patio.
A conditional use permit for ttre dining patio.
Modification to adopted view corridor #1. (vantage
point fron the steps of the parking structure over vail
Vitlage to Vail I'tountain. )
t-.
2.
3.
4.
4.
5.
Applicable elements of this proposal are reviewed within the
nemos. The staff can not support this project at this ti:ne.
There are a number of positive elenents of this plan that should
not be overlooked. Among these are the streetedge improvements
along Hanson Ranch Road, the introduction of dining and the
walkway along Mill Creek, and tlre fact that developnent on the
site is not being maximized. However, the staff feels strongly
that nany eleurents need refinement. Among these are the new
dining and walkway along ltill Creek, the overall massing and roof
forms proposed on the building, and the proposal to conpletely
enclose the existing Red Lion dining deck. Staff recommends
denial of this request as currently proposed.
Jay Petersen, councit representing the applicants, began by
re-alling the last neeting. To the best of his memory the
Corunission asked for several changes at the last meeting. To
sinplify the roof forns, Iessen transparency' move the deck to
the east and enclosure along the northhtest corner.
Jay asked that the Connission keep in mind that there are 2
diiferent applicants in this nanner. one was the comnercial
space otrners and the other the private condo ordners.
Jay felt that in tooking at the Design Guidelines, it was
important to get activity around the proposed back deck area. He
telt that this would not be accomplished ltithout the deck. As
far as the deck enclosure, he felt that the nrekordil doors litere a
trade-off. Blurs, Sweet Basil and Vendettars were examples of
businesses currently using nrekordr doors. Contrary to What Tom
lrad said, he felt they were opening the deck up rather tban
closing it. If this enclosure lras a najor problem' the
applicants were open to discussion.
Jay continued to explain that he felt the town had lost a lot of
reltaurants because of the cost of redevelopment and commercial
space. Referencing public input on this project, Jay wished for
the Conrnission to be aware of the feelings of neighboring
building owners htho Itere not present. He said that Jack Curtain
and the-Board of Director of the Stifer Building are now in
agreement.
Jay felt that they had been very sensitive in trying to keep the
nassing out of view. It was unfortunate that it affected the
Rucksa6k. He felt that the mass needed to be kept off of Bridge
Street and Hanson Ranch road. In order to significantly reduce
the view irnpact to Rucksack, they would trave to shift tbe
building by 20-30 feet.
Jin trlorter, architect representing ttre applicants, began to
address issues raised by Ton. He stated that he agreed that a
3r5n walk eras not enough.
Kathy lfarren inquired about the tree relocation. Jin t{orter
explained that the only reason they were considering relocating
the trees was to allow for the public wal.kway. It had nothing to
do with the building or construction itself.
Jin Morter explained that they felt the view down Hanson Ranch
Road was very inportant though it was not a fornally adopted corridor. He continued to explain that they would be more than
happy to work with Jeff Winston of Winston and Associates. As
far as the adopted View corridor, they were behind the Clock
Tower and Rucksack Tower and below Gold Peak Building. Jin felt
that it was appropriate to keep the roof of the building stepping
back. Ite showed in exanple of the Hill building and how it was
done.
Jim Morter explained that he had followed the suggestion of the
board from the previous neeting and reduced the glazing with
windows. However, he felt that it was appropriate to have
nindows in a living room. They have changed the windows in this
location but not deleted then.
Referencing Tomrs cornnents on Sun/Shade, they cast no new shade
on the Rucksack building.
Kristan asked for Jin llorter to point out the specific structural
changes that were made.
Jim Morter pointed the changes out on the drawings. The changes
basically include window deletions, regroupings, mass changes and
changes on the East elevation. The decks were siroplified'
windows were changed to punched opening rather than arched
openings, and in general, a more Tyrolean look was added to the
architectural style.
Jin Morter showed pictures of roof lines and window treatments
found on various buildings throughout the town. Exanples of
buildings included the Sitzmark, the Gorsuch Buildinq' the One
vail Plice Building, the Hill Building, Helgas, the Tivoli and
the Lodge building. These examples showed that the Red Lion
building was both appropriate and found within the framework of
the vi1lage. Jin continued to explain the roof changes on the
north and south elevations and the deletion of roof slopes.
Regarding the windows, they made a 3Ot reduction in window
treatrnenis. The only place large glass is still in place is the
living room. He felt he could not recomnend to his ctient to put
3 3r5ir window in a living room with a view of vail Mountain.
Regarding the suggested roof changes along Hanson Ranch Roadt
th-y nade only ninor changes to the elevation. He felt that to
bring the lines together would add unwanted bulk.
Jay Peterson interjected on the views on that side of the building. He felt this added bulk would block a wanted view.
For example, the Hong Kong building blocked the Lazier Arcade
building view.
A VIDEO TAPE OF THE SUPER STRUCTT'RE WAS SHOT{N.
Yvonne l{ullaIly addressed the Conmission with public input. She
ouns a unit in the Rucksack building. She had a few guestions.
First she wished to know if the deck in the back required a
setback variance. second, she asked Jln llorter how the addition
affects her right to light. She has to lay on her back to see
dayJ-ight. liorter responded that the addition is affecting the
arnount of sky but not light.
Diana asked Tom to distinguish the difference between Light and View. Tom expJ.ained that tiqht does not specifically nean direct
sun light. Jirn Morter pointed out that according to Sun/Shade
charts, the Red Lion buitding only cast shadohls on an existing
roof.
Yvonne asked why atl the rnass of the building was on the side of
the Rucksack buitding. Stre continued to ask why more cement is
needed (walkway) along the creek. She also found it hard to
believe that they were planning to relocate 17 year old trees.
Yvonne continued by asking wbether Rod Slifer's approval of the
project lras on behalf of the condo Association or his personal
Lenefit. Jay responded that the approval was per the Board of
directors.
Pepi Granshanrner approached the Commission with public input. He
statea that he is at this neeting on behalf of the Village' not
specifically this project. He feels that the Vil-lage sty]9 and
sLale is why people visit Vail. one building will not kill the
character oi Ltre-vi11age. However, if you approve ttris project'
it will set a precedence for others. AIso, the summer tourist
trade is very important to the Village. He feels this trade
would be hurt by such major construction in the Village. It also
seems to him that a project that requires five variances nust be
looked at very carefully. we should be careful not to burt the
character of our village.
Dalton Willians conmented on the unit entrance by the Szechwan
Lion Restaurant. Instead of four 90 deqree turns, it would be
nore suitable to leave it the way it ras today. This would save
tosing a tree, planter and a cut-up walk. Dalton would prefer to
see the walk follow the contour of the strean, meandering, rather
than a straight edge. He also suggested the possibility of
constructing-a bridge at the end oi the wafk until the connection
behind the Rucksack building can be conrpleted. Dalton liked the
punched windows. However, he felt they still looked 1980rs or -90's. He agreed with Pepi that growth must be linited.
concerning the Rucksack building, Dalton felt that the Red Lion project was taking 100t of the views fron the unit in the Rucksack. lle suggested taking the back corner where the fireprace was straight back. This wourd add back sone view of Gold Peak for the neighbor. Dalton was also concerned about the vent fans. Ile was rrappalJedrr by the noise and grease. Uore attention needed to be paid in this area. negaiaing the front deck enclosure, he was not too concerned as rong as-it was opened up. He was concerned sith the existing planter. It looked as though it would fall apart at any tine. -
chuck crist asked if the passage between the Rucksack and the Red Lion building could be opened up by this proposal and Tom responded, nNorr. Both buildings were built to existing property lines.
chuck continued by commenting on the vent fans. He wourd like to see them consolidated due to the snelr etc. He appreciated the reduction in windows and felt it did look better arong with the reduction of the nunber of roofs. He asked what the litch was along the roof and uorter answered, '3/L2r. chuck slia that tre would like to see flower boxes on every porch. He had no problem with enclosing-the front deck. Eowever,-he did see a prob-Iern with the existing planter wall out front.
Kathy Warren questioned the June 15 to Septenber 15 requirement to keep the deck open. Jay responded that he did not feel that the intent was to keep the deck open 24 hours a day. ft does not nake sense if it is raining and cold. Also, they would like to be able to close the doors at the tine the establishnent closes.
Kristan Pritz conmented that this is a najor concern and should be addressed further. In her opinion, this 1982 condition of approval should continue.
Dalton stated that a compronise could possibly be nade. They could be required to be open with the exception of inclement-weather. This would eliminate the possibility of closing then due to noise.
Diana asked if there hrere any restriction of Vendettars or Blurs and Tom responded none. The assumption was made that the desirability of an open deck would keep the operation open when possible.
Jay stated that they could agree to a compronise such as Dalton had suggested.
10
Kathy warren continued by agreeing that the mass should be
brought toward Hanson Ranch Road in order to be more sensitive to
the Rucksack buildlng. She was also concerned about the fans.
She would like to see the elevation fron the pedestrianrs view
frorn Hanson Ranch Road staked again and felt the elevation is still very complicated. Jin Morter asked if she felt so strongly
about the elevation that she would prefer to see a cold line with
more bulk. Kathy explained that it seemed to her they could pull
some of the mass fron Rucksack toward the Hanson Ranch side and
sinplify the roof on Hanson Ranch. Kathy was Dore confortable
with the fenestration. she was in favor of ttre trrekordtr doors on
the Bridge Street deck. She was opposed to the patio dining on
Town of Vail property. She would agree to the strean setback
only for the small building addition, not for the deck. She
could not agree to a site coverage variance for the patio dining.
Honever, she had no problem with a site coverage variance for the
small building additlon. Kathy had no objection to the view
corridor arnendment and would like to reiterate that the planter
area in the front needs to be redone.
Jay asked if she felt it needed to be redone or repaired and
Kathy responded redone.
Jirn Shearer took the floor by conrnented that he also would l-ike
to see the North elevation restaked. He asked about a right to
air and sight. what it irnplies. If exhaust comes directly into
Rucksack, what happens?
Jirn Shearer continued by explaining that one chimney would be
more desirable for the senses of snell and vision. He agreed
with Da1ton that the view from Rucksack could be addressed by
deleting the corner fron the back chirnney area.
Jin asked if the rock wall found along the strearnwalk behind the
A & D building was sonething tbat could or would be done behind
the Red Lion building? Kristan answered that the staff feels
that opening the area up to pedestrians is positive. The 6taff
feels Ltrat [ne proposed dining deck could be reduced to allow for
more of a green area. They would prefer not to use any tlpe of
retaining wall.
Jirn Shearer liked the walkway idea in general . He liked the
architectural changes on the most part and agreed with Chuck that
he would like to see more flower boxes. Jin Liked the rrekordrl
doors and was happy to see that the logo would be brought back.
He also liked the iact that they were witling to work with Jeff
ttinston on the streetscaPe.
11
connie Knight apologized for not making the site visits. She
stated that she had no problens with the window changes. She
asked how much room there was to the South for a nass shift and
Jirn llorter answered approximately several thousand sguare feet.
Connie continued asking if they could shift the mass in this
direction without affecting the view corridor? Morter replied
that they could expand without affecting an official view
corridor. Holtever, they felt the view between Red Lion and
Cyranors rras important.
Connie then asked if they could redesign tbe back corner by the
fireplace as suggested previously in order to open up the
Rucksack View and lrrorter answered that this would not leave a living area. Connie then asked if the awning would be left on
the front side of the building and Morter replied yes, a
permanent awning. Connie then asked BitI Anderson, proposed
construction superintendent, if he could build without hurting
the trees in the back and he replied yes.
Diana Donovan wished to reiterate points made by the other
Cornnission members. she agreed that the fans needed to be
addressed and that the stream setback should not be increased
except for the condo entrance. she didnrt feel there should be
an open patio in the back. Glass doors would be nice. The path
area should be infonnal with no retaining walls. Diana then
asked about the height of the planter wall out front. ltorter
responded that the wall behind the new planter rould be taken
out.
Diana felt a two foot planter would not be adequate to keep
people safely within the deck boundaries. The deck needed more
ieplration. -Keeping the awning and logo was great. She did not
like the access for the condo entrance. It should not be entered
off a public area. Diana was against the North deck enclosure
without receiving soroething in return. She would be nore in
favor of the enclosure if they could Curve the corner so as not
to block the view around the corner. She felt ttrat the rrrekordrl
door issue (tines for openingr/closing) needed specific
restrictions. she coutd agree to allowing then to cl-ose the
doors lrhen the bar closed but not during inclement lteather.
Diana felt it would show great sensitivity if they could redesign
the corner to allow a view from ttre Rucksack building.
Diana preferred not to move the line on the view corridor but to
allow Lhe exception of a new picture once the building was
complete. Stre was afraid of setting a precedence.
Tom stated that this was an issue to be discussed with Larry
Eslsith.
L2
Diana continued stating that she would like to see the applicants help find a solution to the delivery problem. She would like to
see all access to the Red Lion building totally from Hanson Ranch Road. In response to Pepirs conments, Diana agreed that there
are some tough decisions ahead for the Connission. There will be
nany that will rnake people unhappy, however, she felt they would
be looked upon favorably in the future.
oscar Tang, speaking for his wife, stated that they trave been
accused of being part tine residents. They prefer to live here part tine. His wife has chosen to improve the property. If you
want flower boxes, she wlll rnake sure they are there. She wouLd
love to win the contest for fl-owers or lights. However, the Hills are pretty tough to beat.
Tank continued stating that his wife is not a developer. They
bought the Red Lion with the intent of capturing the control of redeveloping. They have the same desires as Pepi and feel they
are sirnply taking a more active role by purchasing and developing
the property themselves. They felt that they could be more
sensitive than just any developer. They understand they are
hurting others, but feel they are helping tbe Town as a whole.!tr. Tang expressed ttre fact that he would be willing to restrict future developnent.
Chuck Crist stated that he had since changed his nind and would
rather not see a deck in tbe back. He liked Dianars idea of
large glass windows. In response to Mr. Tangrs conment
concerning restriction of future development, Chuck inquired as to the number and names of the other owners and how this restriction could be accomplished.
Jay replied that there were two individuals through Landnark properties and the Tangrs. Tang would agree to bind GRFA.
Everything outside the confines of airspace will need permission
of all other condo owners.
Jay then reguested that the matter be tabled.
Discussion continued regarding the staking of the property with
Jay conmenting on the cost and Tom directing the Conmission that
if they have any questions, they should request the staking.
Diana cornrnented that it would make her feel more comfortable in
rnaking a decision. It was agreed the entire roof would be staked for the April 9 neeting.
A rnotion to table this proposal to the 4/9 rneetinq with the
condition that revised plans be subnitted bv 3/26 was rnade
by Connie Knicrht and seconded by Dalton Willians.
VOTE: 6 . O IN FAVOR OF TABLING
The meeting hras adjourned at 7:30 p.n.
13
-
€'"o-' 'a an".!'a/ # flM v eJ'4t'o/lJ>
3/a/zo.2nd Revision
PUBLIC NOTICE
NoTICE Is ITEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental
Comnission of the Town of vail will hold a public hearing in
accordance lrith section 18.56.060 of the nunicipal code of the
Town of vail on March L9, L99O at 3:00 p.n. in the Town of Vail
Municipal Building. Consideration of:
1. A request for an exterior alteration' stream setback
variance, view corridor anendrnent, site coverage variance,
and conditional use for a deck enclosure and new outdoor
patio for the Red Lion Building.
Applicant: Frankie Tang and Landrnark Properties
2. A Work Session on Air Quality
3. A request for a side setback variance for Lot 5, Block 2,
VaiI Village Sixth Filing.Applicant: Clinton G. Ames, Jr.
4. A request for a conditional use permit to ex;rand a proposed
parking structure for the Vail Valley Medical Center on Lots
E and F, Vail Village 2nd I'iling at 181 West Meadow Drive.
Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center
5. A request for a Speciat Development Dj-strict for the Garden
of the Gods on Lot K, Block 5, Vail Village Fifth Filing at
365 Gore Creek Drive.
Applicant: Garden of the Gods, Mrs. A.G. Hill Fanily
The apptications and inforrnation about the proposals are
available for public inspection in the Community Developrnent
Department office.
Town of vail
Conrnunity Deve)-oprnent Department
Published in the Vail Trail on March 2, L990.
John M. Perkins I nrcnitectrA / Fost office acx2a,i vol, cotdo 81658 / go+94946s7
21 February, 1990
Shelly Mellow
Office of Community Development
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Boad West
Vail , Colorado 81657
Re: Clinton and Doris Ames' Request for a Side Set-back
Variance: Lot 6, Vail Village' 6th Filing
Dear Ms. Mellow:
Kindly review t!r'e attached letter of 18 Februaryr 1990
from Clinton Ames to the undersigned. Mr. Ames believes
that if you are fu1ly apprised of his reasons for request-
ing the setback variance as original-ly submi-tted that you
will understand the "practical , efficient and economic"
necessity of constructing the addition on tbe west side
rather than to the south as you recormend.
Your further consideration, in light of these enclosed
issues as explicated by Mr. Ames which are most germane
to the exigencies of the addition's location, is sin-
cerely appreciated.
from Clinton G. Ames
dially,
Encl: Letter of 18 February, 1990
JMP/ran cc. Clinton and Dori.s Ames
February 18, 1990
John M. Perkins
P.O. Box 266
Vall, Colorado 81658
Dear John:
I had previously looked at rnaking the house addition to the south but
decided that it was not practical, efficient or economical for the
following reasons.
t. There is an 8+foot elevation difference between the south side
of the house and the north side of the garage. If the room
addition was nade by extending the house to the south' the
floor and window levels of the new room addition would be
below grade.
2, Snow falling and rain drainage fron the garage roof would fall
to a six foot area and impinge against the south side of the
new roon.
3. Double garage located directly behind ny house is deeded to
owners of larger house (Dr.& Mrs.Cadol). The addition of ny
house to the south would be within 8ft. of their structure'
Excavation into the steep grade coutd effect the foundation of
their building. I would not ask or expect them to aPProve such
anarfangement.Conversely,allthepropertytothewestofny
house is deeded to me. Therefore, any addition would not
effect the Cadol'e ProPertY.4. The Cadol's house is used as rental ProPerty' The only
entrance to both houses is down the stairs from the garage and
carport area. For safety and convenience, this area remains
lighted most nights and traffic down the stairs is very
noisy. The addition of a bedroom for the most quiet and
comfort should be as far away from this area aE possible'
5. Extension of the housa to the south would be costly and
inefficient. It would necessitate relocating the second floor
bath in order to provide access to the new Znd f loor bedroom.
I don't believe that a good arrangeBent can be worked out that
would allow bathroom convenience to both bedrooms without
sacrificing scarce floor space for hallway. Also' if this were
done, the second floor bedroom would be too small and the
whole project not justified. Conversely' by making the
addition to the west, the access to the new bedroon would be
through the existing window with convenient access to the
existing bath.
6.Asfarashardship,l'mnotcertainthatanyonewhoPaysthe price for real estate in Vail can clairn hardship. As explained
to you, we use the house in vail as ouf second home. we have a
daughter and a son who live a considerable distance fron us
and also from each other. l.l e use Vail as the nfamily gathering
' place. tt is obvious that another bedroom would be
conslder.gbly nor.e courfortable, convenient and liveable. The
'one mann kitchen in the house is nost inpractical and
Page 2
dtfflcult tf thls house ls golng to be used as a long tern
home. The only uay this can be corrected ls by the expanalon
belng requested.
Denlal of ny request to expand ny house to nake this a home which would be more
and coofortable. I guess at rly stage in
be a hardship.
to the yest wlll stop uy plan practical, liveable, uscable,llfe this denial sould really
I hope the above rrill convincE the local authoritiee to approve ny
house expansion as raquested, lncluding the addttional GRFA tf
poasible.
youra,dh
Clinton G. Anes
P.O. Box 137
Polnt Clear, AL 36564
Tel: €OS) 924-0795
o o
furr ED
TO:
FRO}T:
DATE:
Planning and Environmental Conrnission
Conmunity Development Department
February 12, 1990
SURTECT: A reguest for a variance from the side setback
requirement of the Primary/Secondary Resj-dential Zone
oistrict for Lot 6, Block 2, Parcel B, Vail Village
Sixth Filing (725-9 Forest Road).Applicants: Clinton and Doris Ames
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE VARIANCE REOUESTED
The appticants, orrners of Lot 6, Block 2, Parcel B, VaiI
Village sixth Filing, are requesting a variance from the
side setback reguirement to allow the construction of a l-3rx
L2t6't two story addition on the west side of the existing
structure. The addition to the secondary unit will encroach
3 feet at the north end and will taper down to the 15 foot
setback line on the south.
The site is currently occupied by a 2 farnily structure
consisting of 2792.7 sq.ft of GRFA ltith a total allowable
GRFA of 4190 sq. ft. The prinary unit consists of L679.2
sq. ft. of GRFA and the secondary unit has LLl-3.5 sq. ft. of
GRFA. The maximum site coverage allowed is 3879 sq. ft.
for this lot, and the property currently has 2a28 sq. ft.
The applicantrs proposal is to add 288 sq ft of additional
GRFA to the unit which will subsequently encroach into the
15r side setback.
II. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060 of
the Vail Municipal Code, the Department of Cournunity
Development recornmends denial of the reguested variance
based upon the fotlowing factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
l-. The relationship of the recruested variance to
other existingr or potential uses and structures in
the vicinity.
The proposed addition should not have any negative
impacts on the existing or proposed structures in
the vicinity. adjacent property owners would not
be significantly inpacted by tbe proposed
addition.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a
specified requlation is necessarv to achieve compatibility and unifonnity of treatment anong sites in the vicinitv or to attain the objectives of this title without <rrant of special privilecre.
Staff does not find that there is a physical
hardship regarding this variance request and feels that approval of the request rould constitute a grant of special privilege. We also feel that the applicant has not given full consideration to
other design solutions for construction of the addition wtrich would not require a variance.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population. transportation
and traffic facilities. public facilities and utilities. and public safety.
Staff finds that the reguested variance will have
no significant effect upon any of the above
considerations.
III. Such other factors and criteria as the cornrnission deems
applicable to the proposed variance.
IV. FINDINGS
A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the lirnitations on other properties classified in ttre same district.
B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in
the vicinity.
c. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
1. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
2. There are exceptions or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone.
3. The strict interpretation or enforcernent of the
specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the oltners of other properties in the same district.
V. STAFF RECOIIIMENDATION
Staff reconnendation is for denial of the requested 3 foot
encroachment into the side setback. The staff feels that the applicant has not fully investigated all possible alternatives that would not reguire a variance. The staff feels that the addition could be redesigned or noved from the west elevation so that it wiLl not encroach into the setback. Without being able to identify a true physical
hardship which would linit the Location of the proposed addition, the staff is unable support the applicantrs
request.
t-'
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning
Cornmunity
February
and Environmental Conmission
Development Department
L2, L99O
-------+
II.
Applicants:
(725-8 Forest Road).Clinton and Doris Ames
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE VARIANCE REOUESTED
other existincr or potential uses and structures in
the vicinitrr.
The proposed addition should not have any negative
impacts on the existing or proposed structures in
the vicinity. Adjacent property owners would not
be significantly inpacted by the proposed
addition.
literal interpretation and enforcement of a
specified regulation is necessarv to achieve
compatibilitv and unifonnitv of treatnent amoncr sites in the vicinitv or to attain the obiectives of this title without grant of special nrivilecre.
sq. ft.r.for thi
The
-F-.
of GRFA andl
pr unit consists of L679.2
s 1ot, and the property currently has 2828
Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060 of
the vail Municipal Code, the Department of Community
Development reconmends denial of the requested variance
based upon the following factors:
ry
CRITERTA AND FINDTNGS
A.b C&W(p o{,r,rg^k
t iv,nd'tIt'
wilrl #u
t*t"4,"|V'
2.
Staff does not find that there is a physical
hardship regarding this variance request and feels that approval of the request would constitute a grant of special privilege. We also feel that the applicant has not given full consideration to other design solutions for construction of the addition which would not recruire a variance.
?A
air. distribution of nonulation. transportation
and traffic facilities. oublic facilities and
utilities, and public safetv.
staff finds that the reguested variance will have
no significant effect upon any of the above
considerations.
III. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems
applicable to the proposed variance.
IV. FINDINGS
The Planning and Environnental Conrnission sha1l rnake the
followingr findinqs before crrantinct a variance:.
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the Iirnitations on other properties classified in the same district.
That the granting of the variance will not be
detrimental to the public healtlr, safety or welfare, or naterially injurious to properties or improvements in
the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the
following reasons:
l-. The strict literal interpretation or enforcenent of the specified regrulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this tit1e.
2. There are exceptions or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same zone.
3. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the
specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the sane district.
J.
tarwv,h,r4 ^4ti
A'
\t\F t&*'W. a w\w*,
c.
STAFF RECOUI,TENDATION
t o
D,Wfu^,wtnuf Vw\fr %1:u W W^X Afv 7
Wwt' fuwr1oy*hr''t +o not'^51lu^"P *cLd'tt;w7
?r',,kf." \^Ah* +o di if" blm^^'r- +
M\tdMkx*w& | uW'
WW "W lo \^-a4 +vl/w W^
Wr&,"Sulu {^Af {vvts i, W TWY
'bw cgvnv-n-r,,wr Wo_ ^Wt/ovv-4
^/^{o Wd- Jo I DW
bt\trw ?wrw'nq'\ry W w1,f - 6wt d yr.dr"f
?lx|I^w+ - AITUA,^A W fl",zA 4,
Wn+ v#'tX"u'**o{ tuttlth'v'^s
Vfu*q - fih-;tvo 6/va ehlt yi rvlti gaWhans
"A& /v$^Y 'rw'd*VrtttP
iWL*b tuoda W a' N -f
l2ah'lLJl/ Vrlaxvtttt"-, du,r'^vd A% W vt urW *
,vnet, fu"ua W a- qf*rJ t fuol yrfu yrdw trwah wr
#ry Slrvt 6-O L^r,*^jnrurns &" aw-og
o
'-'---1-''-'/
@ Itletl
!-
N
u
I
I
,!]
i
lo )'>tl a.$*i{
TEI
IDoi"IlIt -i >3
ttit
!--. ":
tl$t
:
?
{f
(.i
I
I .)
.t
t
I
I
rl
i,
1l ,
sl
0 o
J
lLf
s
sJ$dI+
$..L.'1 :II
o
a
j.i
ilj
PI,ANNING AND ENVIRONITIENTAL COMMISSION
February 12, 1990
![inutes
Present
Chuck Crist
Diana Donovan
Connie Knight
Ludwig Kurz
Jim Sbearer
Katby Warren
Dalton Willians
Item no. 2:
Staff Kristan Pritz
Irlike Mollica Shelly Mello
Tom Braun
Betsy Rosolack
The Planning and Environmental coiunission meeting began at
approximately 3:00 p.n. following Site Visits which started at
r2loo p.m. ihe neeting ltas called to order by the vice-
chairperson, Diana Donovan.
ftem No. L: Appointnent of PEC chairperson and
vice-chairperson.
KathlWarren moved to appoint Diana Donovan as chaircerson.
Chuck Crist seconded the rnotion.
VOTE!6-OINFAVOR.
Jirn Shearer noved to appoint Chuck Crist as vice-
chairperson.
VOTE:6-OINFAVOR.
part of Lot D, BLock 2, Vail Villaqe 2nd.
Applicant: Vail National Bank B1dg. Corp.
Jim Shearer excused hirnself frorn this item due to conflict of
interest.
Tom Braun reminded the Board that this was a recomnendation to
the Town Council . He explained the proposal. by stating that
there were two parts to it. one was an amendnent to the approved
plan to allow for the enclosure of two decks on the third floor
of the structure and the second Part ltas a request for an
amendment to the parking standards to allow parking for the
addition within the parking structure at the vail Valley Medical
center. Tom reviewed the criteria for major amendments to sDDls
and then listed several concerns of the staff. He stated that
the staff recommended denial of the request.
A request for an arnendment to Special Development
District 23 and a parkinq variance to allow for an
office expansion. to the vail National Bank
Buildincr, 108 S. Frontage Road a resubdivision of
Jay Peterson, representing the applicant, explained the original
reguests from the hospital and from the Doubletree regarding parking and the proposed hospital parking structure. Jay pointed
out that the Doubletree had anended their sDD even though the parking structure was not started and no condition was placed on the Doubletree at that tine. Jay stated that the hospital has
agreed to add tvro L/2 levels, 35 innediately for parking and 35 at the present would be used for other things to maxinize the space. He said that the past two approvals were not conditional
upon the parking agreement.
He suggested to the Planning Connission that they could approve the reguest with conditions concerning the start of construction of the Hospital parking structure. Jay said the Vail National
Bank wanted to start construction May first. They would be done in July or August. The conditions could state that the parking
structure must be started by August 1 so the Planning Commission
would know whether or not there would indeed be parking
available.
Jay explained that they do have a tenporary timing problem prior to the conpletion of the parking structure. He explained tbat if
one assumed the Hospital did not build their parking structure
the Town could revoke the tenporary C.o. and he would sign a
Letter regarding that.
Ton pointed out that the approved parking structure does not have
excess parking spaces but only rneets the denand of the Doubletree
and the hospital. The proposed additional parking spaces have
not yet been approved.
Kristan Pritz added that at best, there night be one excess
parking spot. Stre also added that, although the town is
supportive of adding the two 1,/2 levels, the Highway Department
would need to be contacted for apProval of the addj.tional parking
spaces because they would contribute to additional traffic. She
continued to explain that the issue is adjacent property owners
wanting additional developurent without the parking in place.
Connie Knight stated that she felt the present Vail National Bank
parking was atrocious and would recornmend denial .
Kathy warren stated that until sonething concrete was in place
with the hospital parking structure, she felt that the Bank
should provide some temporary parking. Also, that the existing
parking should be addressed because, at present, it is already a
problen.
Jay stated that the Bank did neet parking requirements now.
Chuck asked if the Bank wanted to purchase additional parking
spaces that were going to be constructed but were not yet
approved. When he was told that was correct, he wondered what
would happen if the structure was not constructed. Jay stated
that the vail National Bank would have to exercise their option for the additional spaces that they were renting before receiving
a building pernit. Chuck felt that with that restriction, he
would vote for the reguest.
Datton stated that he had lranted to lease a space in the Vail
National Bank for his business but he could not get parking along
with it. He asked if they could reguest a parking study to see
exactly what the needs really were at the vail National Bank
Building. Dalton wondered if they were too premature in trying to vote on the project. Perhaps the hospital could come in with
the proposal for the additional parking first.
Kristan felt that they were premature but that it was an issue
for the Planning Comrnission to decide.
Ludwig added to Daltonrs remarks. He felt that he would have to
say no to the proposal at the mornent. Ludwig asked what the time
table was for construction.
Jay said that it would be okay to table the issue for 2 weeks.
He added that he felt it was unfair of the Planning Commission to
nake the Bank provide more parking than is really reguired-
Diana asked that if there were more spaces needed than were
originally required, if it htere possible to stiIl reguire more.
Kristan said she would discuss it with Larfy.
Tom explained that Larryrs feeling is that if they are cornplying
with the code, he was reluctant to say whether or not they could
ask for rnore parking.
Kristan remarked that if the bank was planning to lease parking
spaces on a permanent basis it rnay alleviate concerns for the
future.
Diana had the same concerns as the other planners and said that
the Planning Cornrnission couLd deny the request, table it or they
could approve it with conditions.
Jay stated that with conditions the Town sould have absolute
protection that the spaces will exist by the end-of the fall and
it would be easily enforced. Ton stated that this was not easily
enforced.
Jay pointed out that the conditions would work, that the Vail
National Bank would not be able to take out a building permit
until the construction of the parking structure began and they
could get a Tco when the parking structure was substantially
conpleted.
Kristan stated that the board needed to realize the wishes of,
and the number of entities involved. She rtas concerned about
getting a Tco before completion of the parking structure. She
added that the Bank is not under constraints that were inposed on
the Hospital. Unusual circumstances lrere put on the Hospital
because of the staging and she wanted the board to keep in rnind
that the action on the bank proposal uas a real precedent and
needed to be looked at very carefully. Jay said he felt that the
Vail National Bank was in the same position as the hospital .
Dalton asked if there was a contract betlteen the Bank and the
Hospital . Kristan answered that it was not officially approved
yet.
Diana suggested tabling for two weeks and Jay agreed. Tom asked
Jay to put the conditions that he had suggested in writing.
The motion was made by Dalton Willians and seconded bv Chuck
crist to tabte the matter for two weeks with the condition that
Jav wouLd draft and submit conditions to Kristan within one week.
voTE: 6 - 0 - 1 (with Jirn Shearer abstaining)
Iten No. 3! A recruest for an exterior alteration to the
Tom Braun described the request as a modest one. That the
Vailglo wanted to add two entries pLus a porte cochere. They
also want to put up a gate and do additional landscaping on the
West side. Tom reviewed criteria and said that it would be as
outlined in CCII zone district and the Vail Lionshead Urban
Design Guide Plan in addition to standard zoning considerations
such as set backs, site coverager parking etc. However, since
the Lionshead Plan focuses prinarily on the pedestrianized mall
area of Lionshead and the Vailglo Lodge is located outside the
main pedestrianized area of Lionshead, most of the review
criteiia were not directly relevant to the Vailglo proposal .
There were no sub areas directly affecting the property. As far
as compliance with the Urban Design Considerations for Lionsbead,
the relevant issues were massing, roofs, facade-walls, structure
and accent elements. The proposal seemed to be in compliance
wittr these elements. Ton pointed out that the proposal is also
consistent with zoning considerations in the CCII zone district.
The staff reconmendation was for approval . However, in
evaluating this site ttre staff felt that landscaping inprovements
are needed on the berm on the Frontage Road. Iandscaping in that
area would screen the parking lot and Ln conjunction with
irnprovements that would be made to Lrostello, it would greatly
improve the streetscape in this area.
The staff reconmended approval with the conditj-on that the
proposed landscape plan be revised to include improvenents to the
berm between the parking Iot and the south Frontage Road.
This revision is to be made prior to the Design Review Board
Review of the proposal .
Kirk Aker, Architect on the project, stated that landscaping on
the back berm provided very Little advantage for users of
vailglo.Jin Shearer stated that he would like to see the entire Frontage
Road landscaped. He also added that he wanted to see the
durnpster on the Southwest corner incorporated in the landscaping
pIan.
Kirk said he would like to discuss these landscape issues with
his client.
Kathy felt that an enclosure or screen for the durnpster should be
part of the conditions to the Design Review Board-
chuck Crist agreed with the need for landscaping on the Frontage
Road and the screening on the dumpster. He said that he was
unhappy about the fact that the tops of the.pine trees were sawed
off Lo-allow the sign on the wall of the VaiJ'glo to be viewed.
Dalton felt that the bern needs to be high and there needs to be
better landscaping, because on the Interstate one can see the
parked cars.
Diana stated that with all the signs on the Vailglo the berm can
be built up a bit.
Connie mentioned that the proPosal did look nj-ce to her.
Crist to table the itern.
VOTE:7-OTNFAVOR
o
Iten No. 4: A request for a ninor subdivision and zone change for Lots 4 & 5, Block 2. Biqhorn First
Addition.Appllcant: Sable/Lupine Partners, Ltd.
Mike Dlollica explained the proposal . He reminded the board that
they had had a work session on this iten trlo weeks prior. He
explained that there were two parts to the requesti a zone
change and a minor subdivision.
The request for the minor subdivision wouLd create four single fanily lots from two duplex lots and the zone change was for single fanily zoning.
Mike reviewed existing zoning and the criteria to evaluate a
zone change. one iten was the suitability of the proposed
rezoning. The staff felt that the proposed rezoning would be
consistent with the Toqrnrs objectives and would not increase
overaLl density.
Mike showed a rnap which indicated large areas of snon and debris flow, red hazard and blue hazard avalanche zones within the
boundaries of the two lots. He explained that the applicant was
proposing to rnitigate the hazards either by constructing large
berrns or direct nitigation whictr is structural strengthening of
the buildings. He said the applicant wanted to keep open the
options of which type of rnitigation to use, and would prefer to
have the individual lot owners decide the method for ttrenselves.
Mike continued to explain that the staff felt very strongly that
the proposed bernj.ng rnethod of nitigation was unacceptable. ft
was felt that vehicular access into the woods to construct the
berm would create additional scaring. Another concern of the staff was the four driveway cuts proposed and the staff
recommended a maximum of two driveway cuts.
The second criteria was whether or not the amendment presented a
convenient, workable relationship within land uses consistent with the rnunicipal objectives. Mike stated that the staff felt that single fanily residential zoning was consistent with
adjacent land uses and was compatible with the neighborhood.
The staff was in favor of the proposed staggered setbacks along
Lupine Drive. Ilowever, one concern of the staff was the
applicantsr request for GRFA. The existing allowable GRFA is
1,3,295 square feet. The applicant is asking for 14,390 square feet. The staff was not in favor of that increase.
The third criteria was whether the rezoning provides for the
growth of an orderly, viable conmunity. Tbe staff believed that
the rezoning would provide for the growth of an orderly and viable conmunity.
The staff recomrnendation was for approval of both the requests
with the following conditions of approval:
1. That the Town council approve the zone change
request before the Planning Connission cha5.rperson
signs the plat.
2. Bhat the plat prohibits the nitigation.3. That the plat include a the total allowable GRFA
include a restriction which
use of berming as a method of hazard
restriction which linits to 13r295 sguare feet.
4. That the plat include a restrictl-on liniting the
number of driveway cuts to a maximum of two.
Michael Perkins, architect for the project, stated that the
applicant would prefer to be allowed sone flexibility in tle
solutions for nitigation of the hazards. He passed out a draft
restrictive covenant proposed to be used for hazard nitigation.
It stated that ttre use of berms as the sole or prinary rnethod of
nitigation of natural hazards be prohibited and that the use of
bermi, retaining wa1ls or other nitigation devices less than 6
feet in height rnay be used in conJunction with direct rnitigation
of the structure. Ite continued to explain that the reason they
were asking for extra GRFA is that it would cost more to do
direct mitigation. This, according to Perkins, would off-set
their cost.
Marty Abel , property owner, said that his engineer confinned that
eactr dwelling unit woutd cost about 24 thousand dollars to do the
direct rnitigition and that ttrat was how they arrived at the
additional square footage for each unit--270 more square feet per
unit.
fn regard to driveway cuts lrtichael Perkins felt that with four
cuts it would be 5Ot Less traffic as opposed to two cuts and he
felt that if they were meeting the single fanily restrictions
they should have single farnily allowance of one driveway per
unil. He said sharing a driveway is part of what raakes a duplex
not as pleasant as a single fanily house-
Marty Abel said he would agree to covenants that restrict large
berms. However, he felt the best way for nitigation was site
specific, not necessarily direct nitigation. He felt the wording
on the restriction should satisfy each requirement for
construction and felt that excluding all berminqt was unfair. He
felt that the covenants could say that beming would not be used
as the prinary nitigation rnethod.
Kathy asked hirn that if he did not want to go along with any of the staff recommended conditj.ons. Uarty that they would go along with iterns #2 and #3 but not #4. Kathy was not very comfortable with the statement that said that they could only do a certain
type of nitigation and asked Kristan if it would be appropriate for the applicant to come back to the Planning Comrnission if
berning is proposed. Kristan answered that the condition was
related to the subdivision request and therefore must be dealt with now.
Kathy fett that the correct way to do this was to come back with
a design and discuss nitigation.
Marty felt that the prinary nethod but felt it was unfair to restrict
Kathy was not cornfortable allowing the drive cuts, she had no problem
should be direct rnitigation
berms conpletely.
additional GRFA. Regarding
having four drivenays.
Dalton felt that the applicant could be permitted additional GRFA
since it would be allowed under single fanily zoning, which is
what they lrere requesting. Dalton also preferred the sentence
that allowed retaining ualls or berns less than 5 feet in height
to be used in conjunction with direct nitigation.
Connie asked if with hazard nitigation was a concern of the
Planning Comrnission. Kristan answered that the Planning
commission needed to consider any concerns that were part of a proposal. Connie was in favor of two driveway cuts, did not
want an increase in GRFA and felt that the nitigation should
probabJ.y be in the structure itself. She also felt that there
should be some warning of the hazard on the plat.
Jirn had no problen with four driveway cuts. He spoke of the
reconfiguration of the lot lines and felt that this type of thing
shouLd be discouraged. He wanted the GRFA to stay the same as
that which was originalJ-y on the tots. With regard to
mitigation, he felt that if they need both tlpes of nitigation
then both types of uitigation should be pernitted.
Diana stated that developerst financial concerns cannot be a
consideration of the Planning Cornrnission. She felt that four
driveways were better than two and that the GRFA should stay the
same. She stated that the Planning Corunission has not previously
given additional GRFA when changing zoning. She suggested
possibly adding a condition that said trees over six inch cal.iper
cannot be renoved. She wanted the setbacks shown on the plat and
covenants for all four lots.
chuck asked if the total square footage restriction would be
placed on all the lots. Mike answered that this would be part of
with the covenants.
A motion was made by Kathv Warren and seconded bv Dalton
WiLliams to recomnend approval of a minor subdivision to the
Town Council based on the staff neno with the following
conditions:
1. That the Town Council approve the zone change reguest
before the PEc chairperson signs the plat.
2. The the following restrictive covenant be placed on the
subdivision: rrTlre primary rritigation of natural
hazards on the property shall be through direct
rnitigation of the structure, and the use of berms as
the sole or primary rnethod of nitigation shall be prohibited. Berms, retaining walls or other nitigation
devices less than six feet in height nay be used in
conjunction with such direct nitigation.rl
3. That the following restrictive covenant
the subdivision: ilThe total allowable
subdivision shall be as followst Lot I
feet, Lot 2 = 31300 square feet, Lot 3 =feet and Lot 4 : 3,395 square feet. The
shall be L3,295 square feet.rl
be pJ.aced on
GRFA for the
3r300 square
3r3oo square total GRFA
4. The front, staggered setbacks shall be indicated on the
Plat.Lot l- = 4o foot front setback
Lo|-. 2 = 20 foot front setback
Lot 3 = 30 foot front setback
Lot 4 = 5o foot front setback
VOTE:5 - 2 with Connie and Chuck votinq acrainst
L2. L990.
VOTE:7-OINFAVOR
Itern No. 5:A recruest to amend a special Develobment DistricE
ior the earden of the Gods on Lot K. Block 5, Vail
A notion was nade by Kathy warren and seconded by Ludwiq Kurz to
approve the zone chancre based on the staff meno dated February
Connie removed
Gods stating a
Fanilv
herself from conflict of
the discussion of the Garden of the
interest.
villaoe Fifth Filino at 365 Gore Creek Drive.
I "/ro
Kristan Pritz presented the proposal to the Board. She started
out by saying that the applicant had decided to have only a
worksession.
Mr. Don Hare, representing Mrs. Hill, discussed the proposal . He
concurred with the staff and reasons for the proposal . He said
the owner will tear down the building and build a new one.
Regarding the concerns of the Vorlaufer residence, he said he met
wiitr ttrern and considered rotation of the building but will still
need to arnend the SDD.
Art carol , a resident of the Vorlaufer, asked when this wouLd be
proposed to come back. Kristan answered that this would be on
the 26th of February, but that she feLt it would be helpful to
hear his concerns today. The main concern is the effect on the
view of the nountain and he questioned whether there nas some way
that this could be lessened. There followed a long discussion of
views, amount of encroachment and View Corridors.
Itern No. 6 :
Condominium Unit #3 in the Gore Creek Plaza
Building at 193 East Gore Creek Drive, Block 58.
vail Villacre First Filinq.
Mike Mollica presented this proposal . He trad a letter of
approval from the Condoninium Association.
The owner of condominium #1, next to the condominium that was
proposing changes objected to the location of a balcony. She had
two- concerns. The first was sharing the balcony and the second
was the fireplace venting. This was discussed and it was decided
to elininate the balcony, and the fireplace would be vented to
the east, three feet above unit #lrs operable windows.
for approval with conditions.
Conditions: 1.The Balconv be rernoved from the comrnon
waII.
The fireplace be vented to the East
about three feet above the window per
the staff memo.
VOTE:T.OINFAVOR
Iten No. 7:
She1ly Mello explained that the applicant reguested to table this
item for two weeks.
est for Ln €xtedalal
10
The rnotion was made bv Kathv Warren and seconded bv Jim Shearer
to table this item until Februarv 26. 1990.
VOTE3 7-OINFAVOR
ften No. 8: A request for a heicrht variance to construct a new
residence on Lot 3, Block 2. vail Potato Patch;
A1pine Townhomes fV.Applicant: Michael Lauterbach
The request is for a height variances ranging from two to nine feet. Tom Braun presented this request and showed site plans and
surveys. He exptained that the project would involve altering existing grades by filling in low points throughout the lot. An
existing easenent is also referenced as a hardship affecting site planning. Tom pointed out that the history on the lot was
relevant.
Sonetime in 19ze excavation was begun for a residence. The
excavation dramatically altered the grade and then this past
sumner the applicant began filling the lot without approval fron
the Town. The factors were relevant in deternining what is the
existing grade of the lot. Ton also added that considering the.
grade of the lot after the L976 excavation would impose an unfair
hardship on the applicant because of the hole that had been
created on the 1ot.
Two surveys ldere subnitted, one showing essentially existing
conditions and one showing the conditions of the lot prior to
excavation in 1976. The staff deterrnined that the most
reasonable survey to use was the one that was done prior to
excavation in l-975. This approach is also consistent with other
decisions rnade by staff concerning J.ots that have been disturbed.
Torn continued to discuss criteria and findings. The staff felt
that granting the request would be a grant of special privilege.
The staff recommendation was for denial. The staff could see no
legitirnate physical hardship to alIost for the variance. The
stiff fett tnat the proposed design showed little consideration
to the grade of the propertY.
Mike Lauterbach, the applicant, took exception to the staff memo.
He felt that he could conforn to the required regulated height if
there were not a gas line in the easenent. He felt that he could
drop the house nine feet into the hole, compensate by allowing a
four to six foot height variance or fill the lot conpJ.etely and
start from scratch. He then pointed out that the Lionsridge
subdivision had filled a whole ravine. He felt that the Potato
Patch subdivision would be best served if the house were built to
the highest and best use for this site. He stated that without
filling the lot, there would be no views of the ski nountain.
11
a
Gary Bossow, a property ouner who lives two lots alray, agreed with both Mike and the staff in that you could fill and build but
he said Lo feet over the height restrictl.on was excessive.
Kristan explained that in construction, the exJ.sting grade must
be used and persons were not given pernission to dunp dirt and
then build on the Lot later on.
Chuck asked how the Lionsridge Eubdivision obtained approvaL and
Kristan said that the planning Cornrnission had given approval for
a total site plan.
cary Bossow stated that naybe the lot was not designed to have a
view of Vail Mountain. Ludwig Kurz then stated that with really
creative plans you could improve the situation without reguiring
a variance. Lauterbach said that he felt that Ludwig was
suggesting that he point the house down the valley but that was
not what he wanted to do.
Connie asked if it was pernissable to fill lots and Diana
explained that they could fill then but they still must use the
original grade in considering height restrictions.
Mike added that the ridge was artificially high and that was a
hardship and that the easement was as big a problen as the low point on the lot. Diana said she could not find a reason for the
variance, and that the lack of a view is not a hardship. Mike
asked about the easernent. Kathy asked if the easements hlere on
the lot wben it was purchased and Mike stated that they were.
Diana wondered if the Planning Corunission didnrt often give
variances for easements. Torn pointed out that there htas still
plenty of land to build on.
At this point the board discussed other ways and places that the
hone could be built.
Jim stated that he felt that the home needed to be redesigned.
Diana said she ltas not convinced a variance was needed.
Bossow asked what kind of bardship Lauterbach could possibly
have.
Diana expressed a need to look at ttre lot again.
llike asked how the L,ionshead subdivision had gotten an approval
and Kristan explained that they went before the Planning
couunission requesting a fill and grading pernit.
Mike Laterbach said he would like to table for two weeks and
present a grading plan.
The motion was made bv Kathy Warren and seconded by Ludwig Kurz
for Denial based on the fact that there was no hardship proven
and per the staff memo.
L2
Ludwiq withdrew his second.
Torn reminded Mike that if the lot were regraded, the engineer
would need to look at the whole proJect and the other lots
affected. Mike said he thought he could come back with a
revised grading plan and asked to table.
Diana asked Kristan if you could look at all the lots that had
been filled. Diana stated that the Planning Conmission had
allowed gullies on lots to deternine whether units could be
separated. Dalton said if the ridge were artLficially raised
that that seerned to be a factor.
The motion was nade bv Chuck Crist and seconded bv Jim Shearer to
table for two weeks.
VOTE:6 - 1 with Kathv votino acrainst tablinq.
ften No. 9: Discussion of revisions to Zoning Code' Siqn Code
and Desicrn Review Guidelines-
Tom explained to the board that there was a need to revise
existing development regulations, that over tine a nurnber of
small and relatively isolated issues and probleros with the codes
had arisen. He asked that the Planning Board take a
comprehensive look at the regulations.
He stated that he was interested in the big picture PercePtion of
existing guidelines, for example do the codes only need
refinenents or are they in need of a major overtraul? Can the
relationship between DRB, PEc, and Council be improved with
regard to the developnent review process? Is the existing review
process cumbersome and slow, not thorough enough or adeguate.
iom wanted to know what the prob).ens were and wanted input for
the RFP.
Diana felt that it was not a good thing to rewrite the zoning
code and that she also feft that it was not a good thing to hire
an outsider. She sirnply felt it needed to be tightened up.
Ton explained that it was extremely valuable to bring in fresh
eyes to look at the zoning code.
Kristan explained that when they did choose a consultant the
staff and Board would have input. They wanted to work with the
Board and Council but felt that a fresh look was inportant.
Diana feft that there were very few ninor problems. Chuck tended
to agree with Diana, he was very opposed to hiring an outside
consuLtant.
13
Jirn felt that we did not need najor involvenent of an attorney to
oversee the project.
Dalton did not feel that an outside consultant was necessary.
He said that the consultant would be paid to study rules that the
staff was already faniliar with. Diana stated that everyone that
works with the code knows the problems already.
Kristan explained that the staff wasnrt advising a total overhaul
of the zoning code, but that she has seen the use of nany loop-
holes and she felt the need for consultant assistance was
inportant, especially given the existing staff level in planning.
Dalton wondered if you could get an outside advisors in certain
areas wlthout hiring a consultant.
Diana expressed that fact that usually ideas seemed to come from
the community during the public hearings.
Kristan said that there would need to be sorne type of consulting
team and that the staff nas not in the position to work on this
because of their work load. Kathy felt that this was not an easy project, that there were broad range issues to consider and that
Lhe county regulations and those of the Town should fit together
better.
Kristan said that it sounded as though the PEC wanted a lead
person with consultants as needed. But she reminded thern that
they would need an Attorney for rewriting the code. Jim stated
thal he would like to see clearer lines between the Planning
Commission and the Design Review Board. Tom agreed that total
revision was not necessary.
Kathy liked Chuckrs idea of having localsr input, but fel-t there
were many locals that were self serving.
The discussion ended.
L4
O NLAI'@ To
fe).W?
Ml*w+'tPl PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GfvEN that the Planning and Environmental
Commission of the Town of vail will hold a public hearing in
accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the rnunicipal code of the
Town of vail on February L2, 1-990 at 3:0o P.n. in the Town of Vail
Municipal Building. Consideration of:
1,. A request for a ninor subdivision and zone change for Lots 4
& 5, Block 2, Bighorn 1st Addition.
Applicant: Sable/Lupine Partners' Ltd'
2. A request for an exterior alteration for the Arnerican Ski
Exchange in the Wal-l Street Building on Block 5c, VaiI
Village First Filingr.
Applicant: American Ski Exchange
3. A request for an exterior alteration for Condoniniun Unit #3
in the Gore Creek Plaza Building at L93 East Gore Creek
Drive, Block 58, Vail village First Filinq.
Applicant: Michael Sanner/Piero Rivolta
4. A request to rezone a Special Development District for the
Garden of the Gods on Lot K, Block 5, Vail Village Fifth
Filing at 365 Gore Creek Drive.
Applicant: Garden of the Gods, Mrs. A-G. Hill Fanily
5.
5. An amendment to Special Development District 4, cascade
Village, to amend Area D, clen Lyon Office Building at 1000
South Frontage Road West, Lot 54, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: clen l.',yon office Bldg. - A Colorado Partnership
A request for a height variance for Lot 3, Block 2, Vail
Potato Patch; ALpine lownhones IV.
Applicant: Michael Lauterbach
A request for an exterior alteration for a portion of Lot 1,
Block 2, Vail Lionshead Third Filingt vailglo Lodge.
Applicant: Craig Holzfaster
A request for an amendment to Special Development District 23
and a parking variance to allow for an office expansion, for
the Vail National Bank Building at log south Frontage Road
$lest, a resubdivision of part of Lpt D, Block 2 ' vail Village
Second Filing.
Applicant: Vail National Bank Building Corp.
7.
8.
nATF: 'U,UqD . -,, r. tt1i t-t'--iiiii ryBtock -l- Filins uet'l v,r tz' -
AoonEss: 17-K FoR€sr Ro -----O!'INER ftv"1LE bii.ii"-ARCHI TECT
ZONE DISTRICT
?nl
l(l
IJU/l3u/
38fr-{+zh?&,++
-.
zoi'lE cHEcK
FOR
SFR, R, R P/S ZONE DISTRICTS
PROPOSED USE
LOT SIZE
Hei ght
Total GRFA
PrimarY GRFA
SecondarY GRFA
Setbacks: Front
Sides
Rear
Water Course
Site Coverage 2 07ct
LandscaPi ng
Fence,/Retai ning 'dal1 Heights
Parki ng
Credi ts: Garage
Mechani cai
Ai r'lock
Storage
Solar Heat
Drive: SloPe Permitted
Envi ronmental /Hazards :
(300) (600)
@ptzoo)
(50)(1oo)
(2s)(50)
(2oo)(4oo)
€/rsTtNlr
P+eoe€ed
a
lesc &d;k
lb,l?,7
ll/3. 5
=-t-4dc*' I
2',)12,? Y
2a
(\
a +
G,\
I )ltwl
1erl2u,fl
I
{a (.-/'
r' \.
' /- -t /tA'\I z vv \----r-- J
Slope Actuai
Aval anche
Flood Plain
Slope
lletl ands
Geoi ogi c
A'l 'l ovted
13sI(33)
+tqo
L6l+
fbTb
Hazards
Comnents:
Zoni ng:
Date:
Approved/ Di saPProveo
)Eatt 5lgnaEure
John M. Perkins / nrcnitecilA / Fost office acx2a,/ voir, cotdo 81658 1 ggg4t+6r
+fttr-F'6o
31 January, 1990
Ms. She1ly Me1low
Planning and Zoning Commisslon
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail , Colorado 81657
Re: Clinton and Doris Ames' Side Set-Back Variance.
Lot 6, Vail Vil1age, 6th Filing
Dear Ms. Mellow:
Pursuant to your request, I offer the following infor-
mati-on to more clearly explicate the hardship aspect
of the Ames' desire to expand their residence at the
above-captioned location.
I might mention, so that you are current on the history
of this submission, that Mr. and Mrs. Ames did meet
with Betsy Rosalack during the Christmas holidays to
discuss their p1ans. Although the outcome of any Plan-
ning and Zoning Commission action cannot be anticipated,
the Ames were encouraged about their chances for ap-
proval .
It is my opinion that this request is a very simple and
straightforward application and feel that the Planning
and Zoning Commission should grant approval for the
following reasons:
(1)The requested location is the only possible
one at which the addition is feasible without
severe hardship to the owners and the owners
of the adjacent primary unit because of the
following inherent hardships:
(a) If the addition was positioned on the
east side of the secondary unit, it would
disrupt the access to both units via an
attached, covered walkwaY.
Page 2
(2)
(3)
(b) If the addition was placed on the south
side of the secondary unit, it would
disrupt the building's proportions and
roof lines and complicate the overall
relationship between building masses,
i.e., the garage/covered parking struc-
ture. It rrould further cause snow to
slide from a steep roof (12/12) onto
the stairway conneeting the existing
(c)
structures.
If the addition was placed on the west
side but moved far enough south to clear
the setback line, it would totally dis-
rupt and bastardize the roof lines leav-
ing an exposed "4 gable" end from the
west side. (The building's design is
based upon the simplicity of the three
building forms and their integrated rela-
tionships with each other. )
The requested location is the only possible
one at which the addition is feasible:-from-.an
internal plan arrangement without incurring
the following hardships:
(a) The proposed first floor allows an exact
width addition to an existing bedroom
that comprises a new bathroom and approx-
imately seven (7) linear feet of addi-
tional bedroom space. Any offset, i.e.t (1c) in the width breaks the lines of the
i.nterior walls making bedroom furnlture
placement disastrous.
(b) The proposed second floor allows a nesl
secondary bedroom to work with an exist-
ing bathroom and takes access through an
existing exterior window. Any other
alignment i-s much less efficj.ent and high-
ly difficult.
The size of the proposed addition (L2'xI2') is
the only acceptable one possible without incur-
ring the following hardships:
(a) Keeping the addition in the same location
but inside the setback line would give the
new upper floor bedroom an east-west inside
Page 3
dimension af 7t -3" which is totally unacceptable for a home of this stature a.nd location and
further makes bedroom furniture placement not
disastrous but impossible.
(b) Keeping the addition in the same location but
inside the setback line wastes approxlmately
30 of the entitled 250 new GRFA.
Ms. Mellow, will you please thoroughly consider the above
mentioned hardships and carefully review the appropriate
drawi-ngs submitted last month. Upon doing so I trust that
you will clearly see the merit of this request and will
recommend its approval .
If you have any questions in writing your evaluation of
this request or wish to discuss the proposal furthert
please do not hesitate to call me at 476-5248.
Thank you.
erely, ,
-- l/\r.n M. Perkins
Iran Clinton and Doris Ames
APPLICATION !ATE: 15 J4""tV' re{
DATE OF oRB XEETII|G3 21 Februa'rv, 1990
DRB APPLICATION 1'
***r*THrs AppLICATISN r,rir-l HOr BE AC;EprED UNTIL ALL INFgRMATION IS SUBIIITTED*** ':.v y v||..- ..--
. :'{:a
I.PRE-APPLIcATI0NMEETING:.;...,..:...'
A pre-application meeting with-a planning staff member,is-strongly suggested to .;:;|;
determine if a'y additional information"ir-iilir"l. No application-r*ill be accented '"i;*"
unress it is comprete (must rlsl'ile 'ri iiJ;l:ii*l*i":i:,il'ln :i:1?ti:"?1351' '-ii#l
it'il'.il ]ipfi:!;l[ ]U;;r;i;iil;y-i; i'i[.-un-dppointmLnt.with the starr to rind -.,*,,
out about additional submittal requir"t"niil -Ff"iiu note.that a CoMPLETE applica--:"':':-,ii-lg
tion will streamiine the approval nry..ti-io" your proiect bv decreasing the number "'"''
of conditions or apprJ"ir-ifili'irt"-bne-,niv'iliiriltE' ALL cirnditions of approval must :#i
l" i.iJit"a before' i lui t d'ing perm'it i s i ssued '
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Airpl icant$' vrish to add a J2tx1-2 ' , two-storY t
frame addition to a secondary A"pt"" @
used as additional bath and sleeping areas'
B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Fores Address
Lega'l DescriPti on Lot
Zon'i ng Pr imarY / SecondarY
B'lock Filinq vv 6th
C. NAI'IE OF APPLICANT:Clinton G. Ames
Address
D. MiUE OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE:John M. Perkins
AddressP.O. Bo* 266 (1000 Liots e Loo
E. NAT1E OF Cl inton Ames
'-<>l gnaEure '_
0 - $ 10'000
001 - $ 50,000
001 - $ 150,000
oo1 - $ .500,000
001 - $1,000,000 er $1,000'000
lai ephone2OS / 928-0795
tel ephone 476-5288
tel ePhone 2051928-Oi95
Address
F.DRB FEE: The fee will be Paid at the time a buiiciing perir'i" is requested'
VALUATlON
$ 1o.oo
$ 2s.oo
$ s0.00
$1oo . oo . $200.00
$300.00
FEE
$
$ 10,
$:.so,
$1so,
$500,$0v
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO.THE DRB:
1. In addition to meet'i n9 submittal reguirements, the-applicant must stake the site
to indicate p"opliiv"il;:;";;-br;iiins .otnurs' Trees that will be removed
should atso be ,]ii'"a."'iiil"r"ir'ruii'u"-.0*pleted before the DRB v'isits the
. si te.
2. The review process for'NEll BUILDINGS will normally involve two separate meetings
of the Design R;;;#b";;],-io-pf un-on at least tivo meetings for their.approval '
3. People who fail to appear before the Design Reviel Board at their scheduled
meeting and who niu"'[ol'allea for i postionement will be requ'ired to be
republished.
The fo.l lowing items no longer have to be presented-to.the,Design Review Board'
They, however, have to be presented to irt!'i""i"s Admin'istrat'or for approval:
skylights and similar exterior changes that do not alter the
plane of the building; and
4.
a. l,li ndows 'exi sti ng
b. Euilding additions that are not viewed
wnich hive had letters submitted from
the addition: and,/or approval fron the
assoc'iati on .
you may be required .to conduct Natural Hazard studies on your
irreci irltn a Town Planner before proceeding'
from any other lot or Public sPacer
adjoining property owners approvrnq -ii.nt f6r', or manager of a condominium
property. You shouid 5.
/;::
l' ;'
o
Appl ication Date 15 January, 1990
pEC MEETING DATE I a FebrqarV, !999
APPLICATION FOR A YARIANCE
NAME 0F APPLICANT Clinton G. Ames, Jr.
ADDRESS P.O. Box 137. Point C1ear, Alabama 36564
I.This
},i'll
A.
procedure is required for any proiect requesting a variance. The applicatlon
hot be accepted until all infoimation is submitted.
B.
., . PI{0NE2O5/928-O795
NAME 0F APPLICANTTS REPRESENTATM John M. Perkins
ADDRESSp.o. eo" 266 (1000 L
PH0NE 476-7975
c.NAME OF OI.INER(S type or p Clinton G. Ames, Jr.
ADDRESS Box 137, Point Cleart labama 36564
PHoNE205 / 9 28-O795
D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS 725-9 Forest Road, Vail , Colorado 81657
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT6 BLSCK 2 ftttttC VV 6th
E.FEE
THE
YOUR
tl $1oo PAID tltllo cK # 2z4z
FEE MUST BE PAID EEFORE THE COMMUNITY
FR0M Clinton G. Ames. Jr.
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I,IILL ACCEPT
PROPOSAL.
F. A'list of the names of oi.rners of all property adjacent to the subject property
INCLUDING PR0PERTY BEHIND AND A.CIICSS STREETS, and their mailing addresses.
THE APPLICANT I"IILL BE RESPONSiBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES.
II. A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE I,IITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED
TO "}DETERMINE !F ANY'ADDITIONAL INFORI'IATiOI,i IS NEEDED. NO APPLICATION t,jILL BE
ACCEPTED UNLESS IT IS COMPLETE (MUST INCLUDE ALL ITEMS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR). IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MKE AN APPOINTNENT
}IITH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADt)ITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A ESULLIIE APPLICATION WILL STREAI"ILINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR
YOUR PROJECT SV OCCRMTNG-THE NUI'IBER oF CoNDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING .AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MY STIPULATE. ALL CONDITiONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE
COMPLIED I.IITH BEFORE A BUILDING PERI,IIT IS ISSNEO. ' ,
III. FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FOLLO!|INC MUST BE SUBMITTED:
. A. A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTEO AND THE
. REGULATiON INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS:
'1. The relationship of the requested variance to'other existing or poter.ltial
uses and structures in the vicinity.
2. The_ degree to-which re]ief from the strict or litera'l interpretation and enforcement of 1,tl:!ill:-d^":gyrltigl it.necessary.to achieve corpaiiuiiity and uniformit_y gt treatment among sites in the vilinity or to iiiii;'til"objectives of this title without grant of special privilege.
OVER
o
2-Vari ance
3. The effect of the variance ol light and air, dlstribution of-population'
ii:inip6itition, traffic facilitiis, utilities, and public safety.
A toooqraphic and/or lmprovement survey at a scale of at least l': - 20' stamped -tu-i'iotoi-ado licensed lurveyor lncluding locations of all.existing.'lmprove-
il6nts,-in|iuOtng-giaaes and -elevations. -0ther elenents which must be shown.
i"ii-iirii"S-anJ't6aa.ing areas, lngress and egress, landscpPed areas and
utility and drainage features.
A site plan at a scale of at least 1".20r showing existing and proposed
bui l di ngs.
All pre'liminary building elevations and floor plans-sufficient to indicate
1h; [i;;;;ions-, genera1-appearance' scale and use of all buildings and spaces
existing and proposed on the slte.
A preliminary title report to verify ownership and easements
If the proposal is located in a multi-fami'ly development.which has a homeowners
issoc'ialioir, then written approval from the association in.support.of.the
projebt musi be received by'i duly authorized agent for said association.
Any additional material necessary for the review of the application as
determined by the zoning administrator..
* For interior modifications' an improvement survey and site plan may be
wa'ived by the zoning administrator. :
IV. Time Requirments
The Planning and Environmental-Commission meets on-the 2nd and 4th Mondays
of each month.'-A-;ilii;te ipptication form and all accompanying material
ias-aescriueo auovej [usi-ue'iubmitted a m'inimum of 4 weeks prior to the date of tl'
iEc ilbii"-["u"iigl' iio-inlJrpi"te applications (as-determined bv the zonins
administr.rto"t uriii u"-uil.ptla bv tirb planning itaff before or after the desig-
nated subr,rittal date.
B.
c.
D.
E.
F.
G.
APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL GRFA
FOR PROPERTIES IN EXCESS OF ALLOWABLE GRFA
Date of Applicationa5 Janua.ry' 1990 .
Date of DRB Meeting2l February' 1990
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE
A pre-app'l ication conference with a member of the planning staff is strongly
encouraged to discuss the provisions under which additiona'l GRFA can be added to a site. It should be understood that this ordinance does not assure each property
an^additional 250_square feet of GRFA. Rather, the ordinance allows for gp tb
250 square feet if certain conditions are mei.
Applications for addjtions under this section wil'l not be accepted unless they are complete. This includes all information requ'i red on this iorm as wel'l as-
Des'ign Review Board submitta'l requirements.
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Anpt ie.anrs wish fn Frt.t "r .lrr-.12r, twe_stery,
frame addition.to a secondary duplex unit. The rooms will be
used as additional bath and sleeprn areas.
B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
AddreSs 725-8 Forest Roa(i,
Legal Description: Lot a__plock__ z _F'il ing W 6th
Zon€ Distrigt Primary/Seconda.ry
C. NAME 0F APPLICANT: Clinton G. Am
Address p.O. Box 132 point C hone JeElS2,g-JIl.s
D. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: John M- perkins
Address P.O. Box 266 (1OOO L gbn e 4'76-5288
E. NAr'rE 0F oWNER(S
# Signature(s)Y
A.Cdr"essP.O. Box 137 Point Ctear ama 36564 honQOS/928-0795
F. Filing Fee of $1OO.O0 is required at time of submitta'1 AmSouth Bank Ck. #2747
/ /ft1?l
submittal requirements, shall be
a final certificate of occupancy.
property owners and of owners of is availab'le from the Eagle County
Condominium association approval (if appl icable).
Existing floor plan of structure.
Your proposal wi'l I be reviewed for conpliance with
The following information, in addition to DRB
required with this submittal:
l. Verification that the unit has received
2. Names and mailing addresses of::adjacent
units on the same lot. This information
Assessor's office.
3.
4.
APPLICANT: Clinton
G.Vail's Comprehensive Plan.
John M, Pekins / nrcnitectlA / Fost Office bx266f Voir, Cfodo 8'1658 | 909-949-46g7
L7 January, 1990
Shelly Mellow
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vai"l, Colorado 81657
Dear Shelly:
Pursuant to our conversation of this dater kindly find
listed below the names and respective addresses of the
abutters who are to be notified re Clinton and Doris
Amesr request for a setback varlance:
Vail Village 6th Filing:
Lot3-Ref #OOO8O3O:
Block I: Lot 5 -Ref #0008710: George R. Cannon
36 Steele Street, #25O
Denver, CO 80206
LotT-
Ref #0010330: P.A. Novelly & Samuel Goldstein
8182 Maryland Avenue
Clayton, MO 63105
Block II: Lot 2 -Ref #0010080:Robert F. Engelman I Financial Pla.ce, Suite 1116
Chicago, IL 60605
Robert F. Engelman 1 Financial P1ace, Suite 1116
Chicago, IL 60605
Lot4-Ref #0009860: Thea J. Rumford
15OO Baseline Road
Boulder, C0 80302
Page 2
Tract
Sincere thanks this afternoon please give me
appreciated.
B: Vail Associates
P.O. Box 7
- Vail, CO 81658
for'"walking" me through the missing parts
and if further detail should be necessary,* caLL. Your attitude and graciousness are
Richard Norris
Cordially,
John M, Perkins I n "niJA / Post office bx266l voir, Cotodo 81658 I 90&949-4697
10 January, 1990
Mrs. Betsy Rosalack
Planner
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail , Colorado 81658
Re: Addition to the Ames Residence
725-9 Forest Road Lot 6, Vail Vi11age, 6th Filing
Dear Betsy:
l{r. and Mrs. Clinton Ames of Point C1ear, Alabama wish to construct a 288 square foot (GRFA) addition to their above referenced Vail residence. The adclition will require favorable action by the Town of Vail Planning Commission for an additional allowable 25Q GRFA and a sideyard set-back along the west property line. This letter shall serve as Mr. and Mrs. Ames formal request for consi.dera-tion by the Commission.
You have previously determined that the west half (secon-
dary unit) of the existing duplex on Lot 6 has 41 allow-able GRFA remaining. The additional allowable 250 GRFA
would make a total of 291 al1owab1e GRFA which would
cover the requested additional 288 GRFA with 3 GRFA to spare.
The Amesr have determined that L2txl2' (inside dimension)is the minimum size for a desired second floor bedroom.
The lower floor footprint also being L2'xL2' necessitates
encroaching into the 15' sideyard setback with a triangle of the proposed addition measuring 3' height and 11.5'
base. The 3r height measured perpendicular to the set-
back line leaves a LZt setback at the most extreme point
of encroachment angling back to the 15' required set-
back at the southwest corner of the proposed addition.
The total area of the required encroachment would be only
L7,25 square feet.
Page 2
Iflthout the setback variance as requested, the inside di-
mension of the second floor bedroom in an east-west direc-
tion would be 9r-O". This dimension would not allow the
Ames to meet their needs with this addition and poses a
definite hardship upon them.
Please find all appropriate application forms' signed by
Mr. Ames and his check for $200.00. AIso note the 1986
improvement location certificate that f have obtained
through Dan Corcoran. Please place these requests on
the agenda for the regularly scheduled Planning Commis-
sj-on meeting on 12 February, 1990.
Should you require any additional information or drawingst
please do not hesitate to call.qi;/r'\L
Encls:
ccr Mr.
Dr.
erkins
DRB Apptication
Variance Application
Application for Additional GRFA Architectural Site Plan and 1986 ILC
and Mrs. Cllnton Ames
and Mrs. Roger Cadol
I|I,*;;;x,t.o.-'|cv -Amsnded't'
3
Order,No.: lZ0Z-V
Date of Policy: I October O3,
1.Name of Insured: I
CL$II'0N g, tt{Es, iIR,
The estate or interest in the land
rEE SIilPT.E
sEPru{BER 27, t9B5 I}r BOOK 426
322505:
TO]IN OF VAIL
COUIITY OF EAGLE
slAlTl OF COLOnADO
SCHEDULE A
1985 At l0r?4 A.H.
and DORIS l{. NIES
described herein and which is covered by this policy is: .
${
VAIL VIf,t.AGE
I,IAP T}IEREOF RECORI}E}
242 *S nECEPTIOil NO,
2.
3.
4.
The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of policy vested in:
CLI$TO$ G. N{ES, JR, and DORIS ll. AIIES
The land referred to in this policy is described as follows:
PARCEL A
TOGST}TM r{ITfT PARCEL D
IOGSITIEXI IUTT{ AH UT{DIVIIM OIE-TALF ( l/2) r
PARCEI, E AltD F, A RESUtsDMSIO$ 0 ffi 6, BLOCI(
SIXTII FILING, ACCORDIIiIG TO I}IE
ATP
. { rt'.,
STE\flARTTITLE
GUAXANTY GOXPANI cobr mt2
Iia.
'JER
#:':"-$';ui"
SCHEDULE B
PolicYNo.: 0-9902-116588
This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following:
l. Rights or clbims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancids, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a
correct survey and inspection o{ the premises iould disclose and which are not shown by the
public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien. Jor services, labor'or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed
by law and not shown by the public records.
5. Any antl all unPatd baxeg and assessnents and any unredeered :
tax saleg. | .',,
T.RighEofwayfordltche8andcanalsconstrucbedbytbcaubhorlby.i..'of the Unlted States, *" ,*"**ta-ly Patent recoricd Septetber lti
19?3 tn Book 93 ab Fage 98'
8. All oll' gas and other nineralr wtthtn- ag$ect.property and cny -
"tO all-a6eig"t""t" bhereof of lntereats\retn'
9. Easement IO feet in wldth alqra the north"\'.rrt" of aubJcct
- - p"il;;ty t" oi"ttt-on itt" ttco\\ plat of sa\a sulolvlslon'
10. Resbrtctlons, whlc[do not con{n a forfeilu1e or reverter
crause, *" "onfi;;Gii" i"strun\ts recorded in Eook I?{ aE
Pases I?9 ancl it;' It\il sg"F, 18i at Pase l ' as anended bv
initi"t2qt recordecl\\aoott I83 at Pase 1{1'
11. Easen""\', rights-of-$ reslrlcbiona as dror* on ttrs
recorded ylab'recorded Septer,.ber 27, 1985 in Book d25 at
bage 242 \ gecePtlon No' 322505'
\,,
12.Terng,cond,itlonsandrestrlctionsascont'alnedtnPartyt|al.l "" i;;;;;.;;";;.i-necraration of covenanLe' condltlons and
Reservation"
-tor-a Resubdlvlglon of Lot 5' Block 2' Vail
Village' Sixtir-itffing recorded Septenber 27' 1985 tn Book
4i5 ai i'age 2+1 as P.iceptlon No' 322504'
'tl
_lr
;;i
't; i'
"1", 'l..
STE\I'AIIT TITLE.".1,
OUANANII ,COXPAXY ,I'
1613 (20M r2€31
Page 3
Project Application
,^," o4 f o'uf ct'll ,
Proiect Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and
owner, Address and phone: CLIF{dOt{ t L tt
Architect, Address and Phone:
riring 6& , zone
Comments:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
D ISAPPROVAL
Summary:
lt ;, l:i ' i,ltr: i'llilrt/t
t'" , Town Planner //\ tA'::i/-\n^+^ .L-* Yl ll /
E statr Approval
o Project Application
t/7 ,*.O l-.J
/o^r. 3r/z 3 '
Proiect Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
LJ | /c1(s/<
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
!Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Surhmary;
6"'r * L
Town Planner
o^r", s/s o/ r 1
(ar"u Approval
o o
-
-
-
-
2
tl ll
T I I
:iltil=il r-'. ;f Fhqrrll! i"f -
lt.st tkv '! I I =._ | | t| -
ar-r
iflflfrfr!fff
o
DRB APPLICATION
*****THJS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL
l,l
APPLTCATT0N DArEt 3/zi/[ 7
-
DATE 0F DRB MEETING , 4 /, s-,/t I
INF0RMATIoN IS SUBITITTED*****
I. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:
A pre-application meeting with a planning staff member is strongly suggested to
determine if any additional information is needed. No app'l ication will be accepted
unless it is complete (must include all items required by the zoning administrator).It is the applicant's responsibi'lity to make an appointnent with the staff to find
out about additional submittal requirements. Please note that a C0MPLETE applica-
tion will streamline the approval process for your project by decreasing the number of conditions of approval that the DRB may stipulate. ALL conditions of approval must
be resolved before a building permit is jssued.
4 v / ^, 1 -tt n t A. PR0JECT DESCRIPTI0N: I tu t ro- L ') ' X 5' i)t I '/A /*lotz
0 +l y'lo,lh 'w"tT 1 ,d. ,4 n-r,t 7 4/ x r'T
B. LOCATION OF
Address
PROPOSAL:
1 ). f Ftn*q f Al ''7 u,' L h
^J (Legal Description Lot BI ock Fi'l i ng
Zoni ng f?,, il o ^f ,nl /n t*,or-,-7n.onJ,,+rt-/
C. NAME OF APPLICANT:
D. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE:
Address ?63] Arr,,-,u Xl, 4 t,,'t te'lephone'i7(-??il
E. MME Oft OI,JNERS:
Address SO1O (|..r' .5ee.,.tas s4. G A.*6.a l.,ol tel ephone 3rZ-tvy-lLY?
Si gnature
Address
t.DRB FEE: The fee wi I l
VALUATION
tel ephone
be paid at the time a buiiding permit is requested.
FEE
$ 0-$ 10,000
$10,001 -$ 50,000
$.50,001 - $ 15o,ooo
$150,001 - $ 500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000 $ Over $1,000,000
$ 10.00
$ 25.00
$ 50.00
$1oo.oo
$200.00
$300 .00
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
1. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant must stake the site to indicate property lines and building corners. Trees that will be removed
should also be marked. This work must be completed before the DRB visits the
si te.
2. The review process for NEll BUILDINGS will normal 1y involve two separate meetings
of the Design Review Board, so plan on at least two meetings for their approval .
3. Peopie who fail to appear before the Design Rev'iew Board at their scheduled
meeting and who have not asked for a postponement will be required to be
republ i shed.
o
4. The following iterns no longer have to be presented to the Design Review Board.
They, howevei, have to be presented to the Zoning Admjnistrator for approval:
a. Windows, skylights and similar exterior changes that do not alter the
existing plane of the building; and
b. Building add'itions that are not viewed from any other lot or public space,
which have had letters submitted from adjo'ining property owners approving
the addition; and/or approval from the agent for, or manager of a condominium
association.
5. You may be required to conduct Natura'l Hazard Studies on your property. You should
check with a Town Planner before proceeding.
MATERIAL TO BE SUBMITTED
I. NEl,l CONSTRUCTION
A. Topographic map and site plan of site containing the following (2 copies):
l. Licensed surveyor's stamp.
2. Contour intervals of not more than 2' unless the parcel consists of 6 acres or
more, in which case, 5' contour intervals will be accepted.
3. Existing trees or groups of trees having trunks with diameters of 4" or more
one foot above grade.
4. Rock outcroppings and other significant natural features (large boulders,
intermittent streams, etc. ) .
5. Avalanche areas, 100 year flood plain and slopes 40% or more, if applicable.
6. Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS landmark or sewer invert.
7. Locations of the following:
a. Proposed surface drainage on and off site showing size and type of
cul verts , sv',al es , etc .
b. Exact locat'ions of all utilities to include existing sources and proposed
service lines from sources to the structure. Utilities to include:
cabl e TV sewer gas Telephone water electric
c. Property ljnes showing distances and bearings and a basis of bearing
d. Proposed driveways with percent slope and spot elevations
e. Al I easements
8. Existing and finished grades.
9. All existing and proposed improvements including structures, landscaped areas,
service areas, storage areas, walks, driveways, off-street parking, loading
areas, retaining walls (with spot elevations), and other site improvements.
10. Elevations of top of roof ridges (with existing grade shown underneath) to
determine height of buiiding.
B. A statement from each utility verifying location of service and availability. To
be submitted with site plan.
C. Preliminary title report to accompany all submittals, to insure property ownersh'ip " 'and all easements on property.
D. Landscape Plan (1" = 20' or larger) - 2 copies
1. Show the location of 4" diameter or.larger trees, :other'shptj6s,aiid-iiatiVe plants thi are on the site and the location and design of proposed landscape areas with
the varieties and approximate sizes of plant materials to be planted. N
2. Complete landscape materials ljst.
3. Designate trees to be saved and those to be lost.
N0TE: As much of the above'i nformation as poss'i b1e should occur on the site plan, so that
the inter-relation of the various components is clear. The landscape plan should be
separate. The existing topographic and vegetational characteristics may be a separate
map. The applicant must stake the site to show lot lines and building corners. Trees
that will be lost during construction must be tagged. The work should be completed
before the DRB site visit.
t
. E. Architectural Plans (1/8" = 1' or larger) 2 copies
, 1. Must inc'l ude floor plans and all elevations as they wj 11 appear on corpletion.
Elevations must show both existing and finished grades.
2. Exterior surfacing materials and colors shal 1 be specified and submitted for
review on the materials list available from the Department of Conqunity [leveiop-
ment. Color chips, siding samples etc., should be presented at the Design Rev'iew
Board meeting.
F. The Zoning Administrator and/or DRB may require the submission of additional p1ans,
drawings, specifications, samples and other material (including a model) if deemed
necessary to determine whether a project will comply with design gu'idelines.
II. MINOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS
Photos or sketches that ctearly ind'icate what is proposed and the location (site plan)
of proposal may be submitted in lieu of the more formal requirements given above, as
long as they provide all important specifications for the proposed includ'i ng colors and
materials to be used.
III. ADDITIONS - RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL
A. Original f'loor p'lans with all specifications shown
B. Floor plan for addition - 2 copies
C. Site plan'showing existing and proposed construction - 2 copies topos
D. Elevations of addition
E. Photos of exist'ing structure
F. Spec'ifications for all materjals and color samples on materjals list available at
Department of Cornmunity Development
At the request of the Design Review Administrator you may also be required to submit:
G. Statement from each ut'iljty verifying location of service and availability. See
attached util ity'location verification form.
H. Site improvement survey, stamped by reg'istered professional surveyor.
I. Prefiminary title report, verifying ownership of property and lists of easements.
IV. FINAL SITE PLAN
After a building permit has been'issued, and when the project is underway, the foilowing
will be required before any bu'ilding receives a framing inspection from the Building
Department: A certified improvement survey showing:
A. Buj lding locations with tjes to property corners, i.e. djstances and angles.
B. Building dimensions to nearest tenth of foot.
C. All utility service lines as-builts showing size of lines, type of material used,
and exact locations. 2 cop'i es
D. Drainage as-builts. 2 coPies
E. Basis of bearing to tie to section corner.
F. A1 1 property pins are to be either found or set and stated on map.
G. Al I easements
H. Bui'l ding floor elevations and roof ridge e1 evations.
LIST OF MATERIALS
NAME OF PROJECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF P
The following information is required for submittal
Board before a final approval can be fiven:
A. BUILDING MTERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL
Roof
Si di ng
0ther l.lall Materials
by the applicant to the Design Review
COLOR
c o J a, 5k i,vr-|.,/rt"y l7ou 'rq, tal
rtuafh oy ti I
CLol
Fasci a
Soffi ts
l,li ndows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fl ues
Fl ashi ngs
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
0ther
B.LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer:
phone:
PLANT MATERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
Botani'caI Name Common Name Quani ty
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED
Si ze*
for conifers.
(over)
*Indicate caliper for deciducious trees,I ndi cate he'ight
" PLANT IIATERIALS: Botanical Name Common Name ' Quanity Size (con't)
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
Tvpe Square Footage
GROUND COVERS
s0D
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
C. OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swiruning pools, etc.) Please specify.
PARTY I{ALL AGREEIIEIIT AT{D
DECLARATION OF
covENAlllTS, CONDITIONS AIitD RESERVArIONS
FOR
A RESUBDIVISION OF
TfrT 6, BLOCK 2, VAIL VILLAGE, SIXTH FILING
TO!{N OF VAIL, EAGT,E COU}ITYI COLORADO
RECITALS
.l. Roger V. Cadol and Sally !1 . Cadolr ("Declarantsi)are the ounera of the reat_propeity sltuat6 in ihe county'of Eagle, Slate of Colorado, dlscilbed as a Reeubdivlston o?Lot_6r_Block 2, Vall-VtllageT Slxth piling, Town oi viii,Eagle County, Cotorado.
2- Declarante have constructed on parcel A and parcel B a bulldlng conslstlng of trro unitsr each desiqned and lntended for use and occupalcy-as a resl.dentiif dwelling gnifr and_two garage unlti deiignated as parcels C and 6,ctgslgnated herein ae .Unit A' and ,Unlt Br, respectivelyl whlch are sonetlnes referred to herern sepirii"iy as "unit"or col.lectlvely aB "unlts'.
3. ParceL A contalns unit A and parcel B contarns unit B. Parcel c (garagel ahalr be appurtenant to and shall be
:9ny:I:q. ?s a. portion of parcet i, parcet D (garagel shatl be appurtengnt to and ghall be conveyed ag a'fortion of Parcel-81 the parcels nay noE be sepirately cbnveyea or partltloned.
DECLARAIION
Declarants do hereby publtsh and declare that the followlng terna, covenanEel conditlons, eaeerenCs,restrictlons, uae8, reaervatlons, ltmtiattons-tnd obllgatlons_eh-all be deemed to run with the land-deecribed o€lQln' snarr ue a burden and a beneflt to Declarants, their pereonal representatlves, helrs, succeasors and aeefgns-in--any peraon acqulrlng or ownlng an intereet ln the reil P-roperty wffgh ls discrtbed hereln and improvementa bullt thereon, thelr grantees, personal repreaeitativet, heirs,successore and aaslgns.
DEFINITIONS
Unlees the context shall expressly provide otherwise,the followlng terms ehall have the folloitng meanings:
A. rThe Properttes" means all of the real estate l9g?fly deecrlbed aa Lot 6, Block 2r vall Vlllage, Slxth Ftllngr according to the nrap thereoi recorded ii ihe offlce of the Fagfg eounty, Colorador Clerk and Recorder,contalnlng 0.4453 icres, nore or IeBs.
B. 'Lot' or iBulldlng Site' neans parcel A or parcel
B as shown on the lilap togetf,er with al1 appurtenances.
- _-9. ipuplex' or 'Buildingi meane the two contiguoua duelllng unlts conatructed upon the parcela.
D. iUniti means any one
conprlslng the ' Duplextr, with
parcela.
of the two dwellings thelr appurtenant garage
E. 'Conmon Arear means Parcels E and F as shown on the
I{ap which ghall be owned equally by both of the ownerg of the Parcel A and B eaeh havlng an equal undlvided one-half interest as Tenantg ln Conmon ln and to the Conmon Areas.
P. nOwnert means a person, perBonsr firm,corporationl pnrtnership or assoclatlonr or other legal entltyr or any conbination thereofl orlng an interest in the
Parcele
G. 'Map" meana the englneerlng survey of the
ProperUles by Eagle Valley Englneerlng and Land Surveying,Inc.r Colorado L.Si 16827r deplctlng and locatlng speclflclty thereon the Parcels and lmprovements thereon,
such land and lmprovenents belng hereby submitted to Ehis
Declaratlon. Such Map shall be recorded in the office of Lhe
Eagle County Clerk and Recorder prior to the recordation of thie Oeclaratlon.
DESCRIPTION AllD RESERVAIION. Every Contract of Sale,
Deedl 1 Leaael ltortgager Trust Deed, Wlll or other lneLrument shall legally descrlbe a Unlt or real property interest as
followg:
Parcel A together wlth Parcel C and Parce} B together wlth Parcel D (as the case may be) r together with an
untlivldedl one-half (1,/2) lnterest ln Parcels E and F, a
Resubdlvlsion of Lot 6r Block 2, Vail Villager Sixth Fllingl accordlng to the recorded map thereof recorded in
Book
-1
Page
-
of the records of the Clerk and
Recorder of Eagle County, State of Colorado.
Every guch deecrlptlon shall be good and sufficlent for all purpogee to eell, convey, transfer, encunber or
otherwlse effect the f,ot and all appurtenant rights, 'benefltsr and burdens thereto as created by the provlsions of thlg Declaration, and each such descrlptlon shall be so construed. This provision shall apply to lhe properties as
sald tern (the Propertles) ls deflned In this Declaration.
PRQPERny DTVISION-
l. Declarants hereby establlsbes this plan for the
subdlvision of the Propertles tnto Stx (6) Parcels for
ownershlp ln fee slmple by the lndlviduat and separate
owners of Parcel A and C, and Parcel B and D' as undivided
co-tenants of Parcels E and F which conmonly owned properEy
ls deflned and referenced as Common Area.
2. The Conmon Area shall be subject to the easements
noted on the map and those set forth herein.
3. Parcel A and Cr and Parcel B and D shall have
appurtenant thereto an undlvlded one-half (1,/2) lnterest in
Parcels E and F, whlch shall be inseparable from Parce1 A
and Cl and Parcel B and D and may be eonveyedr leasedr
devlsed or encurnbered only ae such undivided and appurtenant
interest.
4. No owner shall brlng any actlon for partition or
divlslon of Parcel A and Cr and Parcel B and D or of said
parcels fron their appurtenant undlvlded lnterests In
Parcels E and F.
5. In the event Parcel A and Cr and Parcel B and D are
orned by Ehe game entltlee, the doctrlne of merger shall not
apply;
2
o
6. fhe partie6, lf,,nore than oner having the
ownershlp of each auch unlt shall agree anong ihenselves how to share the right,s and obllgatlons of euch ownership;provldedz however, that lf a corporatlon, partnershipr
assoclatlon or other legal entity shall become an owner or the partles, of nore than one, have the concurren! ownership of a unltr then such entity or concurrent omers shall from tlne to tlne deeignate one indlvidual who shall represent
such entlty or concurrent owners in all matters concernlng a1l rlghts and obllgatlons purauant to thls Declaratlon.
. 7. A4y euch entlty or concurrent omers shall give wrltten notlce to the other onner dealgnatlng the lndividual to act on lte or thelr behalf and such-notlce ghall be effectlve untll revoked ln wrltlng by such entity or omerg.Any agt or omlsslon by such deelgnated indlvldual qlafl be binillng on the entlty or owneri having designated hlm ln favor of the other omer or any other person who nay rely thereon.
8. Eacb unit shall be considered a aeparate parcel of real properhy and shall be separately addressed and taxed.
ENCROACnUENIS. If any portlon of parcel A and C, or Parcel B and D now encroaches upon the parcel as a result of the constructlon of any buildlng, or lf any such
encroachnent shall occur hereafter aa a result of settllnq or ghlftlng of any bulldlng, a vallcl easenent for the
encroachnent and for the malntenance of the sane so long as the bulldllng stands, ehall exlst. In the event any bullding ehall be partially or totally destroyed as a result of fire or other casualty or as a result of condemnatlon or eminent
domain proceedlngs and then rebuilt, encroachments of parts of the bulldlng on the other parcel, due to such rebuilding,shall be permlttedr so long ae such encroachments are of no greater extent than those previouely exlsting, and valid
easenenta f,or such encroachments and the nalntenance thereof shall exlgt ao long as the bullctlng shall gtand. ,
PAR:rr !{ALL. (a) The conmon wall placed equally divideil on the comnon boundary separatlng Untt A and Unlt B,the footlngs underlylng and the portlon of roof over such wall is collectlvely referred to hereln as the iparty Wall,.
(b) To the extent not inconsistent with thls Declaratlon, the general rules of, law regarding party ualls
and liabllity for damage due to negllgenie, wtltiul icts or onlssions shall apply to the Party WaIl.
(c) The ownere of either unlt ehall have a perpetual eaaenent in and to that part of the other unlt on wblch the Party lVall ls located, for party wall purposes,lncludlng mutual supportr maintenance, repair and lnspection. In the event of danage to or the destruction of the Party !{all from any cause, then the owners shall at
Joint expense, repair or rebulld said party wall, and each
oeDe!1 shall have the right to the full use of sald party wall so repalred and rebullt. Notwithstanding anylhing
contalned above to the contrary, if the negligence, willful act or onlsgion of any own€rr his family, agent or invitee,shall cause damage to or destructlon of, the party Wall,
euch owner ehall bear the entire cost of repair or reconstructlon' and an owner who by his negligent or willful act cauges the Party Wall to be exposed to the elements shall bear the ful.l cost of furnishing the neceasary protection against such elenents.
LANDSCAPING, SFIRVICE FACILITIES AND PARKING. (a) The
ortners fron tlrne to tlne shall undertake such landscaping
and general outdoor lmprovements including but not limited
3
tod
unan
both llab
any
born
exPe
wlth
impr
dama
outs toP
o
rlveway and parklng areaa as they may mutually and lmously deem proper for the harmonlous improv-ernent of unlts Ln a conmon thene, and, except for any er(pense or iltty caused through the neqllsence or $tllful ait of olrn€r1 hls family, agent or-invlteg, which shall be e eolely by such ouner, each otrner shall share all nses, liabtlitigs and general upkeep responsibilities respect to such landscaplng and ouldoor-ovenents.The owner of one unit shall not unreasonably
99 th-e yalug- of the other unlt such as by shoddy upf6ep ide, but both owners shall nake alI reasonable effbrts-reaerve a harmonlous comnon appearance of the units.
(b) Conmon utiltty or servl.ce connections or llnes, common facilities or other eguipnent and property located tn or on either of the untti birt usea in-coinnon with the other unit, lf any, shall be owned as tenants in common of-equal undlvided one-half lnterests by the o$rners of each unlt andr except for-atly expense or rlabtlity caused bhrough the negllgence or willful act of any owner, his family,agent or invitee, whlch shall be boine solely by such-owner,all-expenaga and tiabilitiea concerned wlth such property shall be shared-proportionately wlth such ownership.- Tha oyner of the unlt on which such property ls not loiated ehall have a perpetual eaeernent -tn ind E,o that part of such other unlt contalnlng such property as is reasoirably necessary for purposee of naintenance, repair, and lnspection.
(c) It is expected that common access facilities will be provided on a portlon of each of the units. There is hereby created a reciprocal easernent and right-of-way for each owner over, across and through that pait of the-parking and access facitlty located on the other owner's unit-. The -
owners shall have equal right to the use of such access and no onner shall hlnder or permlt hls invitees to hlnder reasonable access by the other owner and hls invitees to the other orrnerrs unit or park or pernit hls invltees to park ,a1Y vehlcle on the parllng and-access facility located on the other ounerrs unit wiEhout the consent of the other oytner.- It is presumed that enowplowlng will be requlred from time to tlme, the cost of wi:ictr wilt Ue shared- by the ownerg. Other maintenance, repair or improvement of such parklng and- access facilities-may be required fron time to tlne, and the sane ehall be undeitaken ripon the unanimous agreenent of the ot{ners who shall share all expenses.
4LTERATION, UAINTENANCE ANp REPAIRS. (a) In addition,to maintenance provided for, the orners shall, at their Joint expense, provlde exterlor malntenance and exterior repair- upon-unlt and the unimproved portions of the parcel
upon whlch ls located including, bub not llmited tol the exterior and the roof housing the units, repairl replacement or cleaning of exterior windows shall be considered- interior maintenance. If the need for repalr is caused through the negligence or willful act of any-osrner, his farnily, igent or lnvitee, such owner shall bear Ehe entlre costs oi suctr repair or reconatruction. Both units must
and with the same cationg the character o the bu
o erior nodi-
(q) In the event an onner at his own expense faile to nalntal.n, preserve, and replace aE needed, ttre treee, ehrubs, and grase (the plantings) wlthln the property
boundaries of, hls residence conrnensurite wtth the stlndirds set by the other resldences ln the Subdivisionr the other owner nay, after 15 days written notice to the owner, if
euch failure and if within said time the owner has failed to
nake a good faith effort to bring his plantings into subetantial conformihy with his nelghbors plantingsr the other may contract with responsible parties to bring to standard the offendlng ownerrs plantings and charge the
owner theref,ore and guch coet, ehall be added to and become a part of the asaeesnent to whlch euch slte ls subJect. The owner hereby.grants to the other owner, lts agenfs and aselgns, an lrrevocable easenent to peiforn t6e aforesaid .
(c) Each owner shall be solely responslble for ndtntenance and repalr of the lnelde oe f,ts uiit inctudlng fixturee and lrnprovenents and all utlltty llnes and equlpment_ located therein and gervlng suEh unlt only,windowr glass and franes shall be deemed interlor nalntenance. In perfornlng euch malntenance and repair, or in inprovl1g- oI alterlng hie unitr no ouner ehall db any act or-work whlch lmpalre the structural soundness of eithei unlt or the Party lfaIl or rhlch lnterferes wlth any eaaenenr granted or reoerved hereln.
- (d) Utlltty,or servlce connectione or llnesr facllltles or othe-r ultltty equlpment and property rocated in, on or upon elther of the unlls, whlch ire'usei solely to sgpply a gervice or.utlllty to one unit shall be owned b|the owner of the gnlt uatng euch utirlty or service and all expenses and llabllltiee for repair and-nalntenance shall be borne solely by the otrner of euch unlt, who shall have a perpet'ual eagement ln and to that, part of euch other parcel or unrt contatnlng.such property ai ls reasonably neceaaary for purposes of malntenance, repatr and lnspectiin.
(q) No onner shall make or euffer any structural or deelgn change (lncludling a color schene chanie), either pern-anent ot temporary and of any type or nature whatsoever to the erterlor of his unlt or consliuct any additional bullcllng- gtructure-9f any lype or nature whiteoever upon any part of hle unlt wlthout fiilt obtalning the prior written -
conaent thereto fron the other ovner. in casE of danage or deetructlon of any unit or any part thereof Ui iny ".u"e whatsoeverr the owner of auch-uiit aball cauei wifn aue diltgelce the unlt to be_repalred and restorea, ippfying the pFoceeds of lnsurancer lf any, for that purposi. 'Such unitr shall be restored to a condlLion conpara6te-to that prioi to the danagg ald in a harmonious rnannei to promote the-conmon thene of both unlts.
- _ ALI,oCATTON OF EXpENSES. CostE and expensee of landscaplngl eervlce facllitlee, parklng, ilterationr nalntenance and repat.rsr exc€pt ai caus6d by negligence of wlllful act of an 6wner, shari be allocated-in-ir,e-ioiiowing proportlonst
Parcel A and Parcel B and
c
D
50c
50r
UECHaNICIS LTENS: TNnFMNIFICATION3 (a) Except for Itene lncurred as a common expenBe is Froviaia ror terein,if any owner sharl cause any rnateriar [o be furnlshed to his parcel or unl.t thereon or any labor to be perforned therein or thereon, the other owner inaft not undei any clrcumstances be liable for the payment of any-expenBe incurred or for the value of the-work done or-matirial furnished; all such nork shall be at the expense of the omer caueing lt to be done, and euch onner shall be solely reeponslble to contractors, laborerg, materialnen and othe?persons furnlshlng-labor or materlals to hls unit or any lmprovenents theriin or thereonl nothing hereln contalnid ahall authorlze either owner or any perion deallng throughl wlth or under elther owner to charge-the unlt or €he oth6r'omer wlth any mechanlcrs llen or 5ther llen or encunbrance whateve-r' and, on the contrary (and notlce ls hereby given)the-right and power to charge-any lien or encunbranie-of any ktnd agatnst one owner or against one otnerrg unlt for work
done or materlalg furnlshed to the other onner's unit is hereby expressly denled.
(b) Except aa provlded for below, if, because of any act or onlsgion of any ownerr ant nechanicfs or other Iten or order for the payment of rnon-y shall be filed against the other ownerrs unlt or any lmprovements therein or thereon or against any other owner (whether or not such Iten or order ls valld or enforceable js such), the owner
whose act or omlsslon forns the basis for such lien or order shall a! hie. own cost and expenae cauae the same to be cancelled and dlscharged of record or bonded by a surety conpany reasonably acceptable to such other owner, within Z0 days after the date of ftltng thereofr and further Ehall lndennify_and aave the other owner harnlees fron and against
?ny_a!q all coster orpena€B; claLns, logseg or danages,lncluding reasonable ittorneyrs fees resulting ther6from.
rNSUnlNcE: (a) Each owner shall keep his unit and alt fixtures therein ineured agalnst loss or dimage by fire and extended coverage perlls (includlng vandallem and malicious mlschief) for the naxinun replacenent value thereof. Any owner nay on 30 dayar wrltten notlcer at any tine one year or-Ionger af,ter the last appraisal of the units, obtaln a lr-ritten appraisal of such untts from a competen! appraiser,charglng both owners nlth the costs thereof. Such-ippraiser shall be a disinterested and lndependent third party who is unrelated in any manner to elther onner rhether-through
Joint businesg adventuree or otherwise.
(b) Each owner shall provide and keep in force,for the protectlon of hlmself, glneral public liability ana property damage insurance against clalms for bodily injury or death or property damage occurring in1 on or upon, his-parcel owned in fee slnple and the lmprovements thereonr in a ltmlt of not tess than S5001000.00 in respect of bodiiy injgly or death to any number of persons ar-lslng out of 6ne accldent or dlgaster, of for darnale to property] and if )
hlgher llnlte shall at any ttme b6 cust6naiy t6 protecr against posaible tort liablllty, auch highel timits shatt be carrled and each owner shall nirne the otier o$rner as an addltlonal lnsured party under such pollcy.
(c) Each owner shall dellver to the other owner certlflcatee evldenclng alI lnsurance requlred to be carried Under thla paragraph, iach contalnlng agfeements by the lnsurers not to cancel or modlfy the pollcles without giving the other owner wrltten notlce of at least 30 days. Eich ownet shall have the right to lnspect and copy all such insutance policlea of the other owner and require evldence of the payment of preniuns thereon.
(d) Nothing provided in this paragraph shall prevent the owners from Jointly acguiring a single policy to cover any one or motre of t,he hazards requlred in this paragraph to be eeparately lnsured against by each onner.
pAMAGE OR pESTRUCTION
DESTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ON PARCEL. (a) In the event of danage or destructlon to a unit by fire or other dlsaeter, the insurance proceeds, if sufficient to recongtruct the unltr shall be deposlted into a bank account which requires, for withdrawals, the aignat,ures of both the
ownerB, or disbursed directly by the insurance carrler. The
owners shall then promptly authorize the necessary repair and reconstruction work and the insurance proceeds wlll be appltecl by the owners to defray the cost thereof. "Repair and reconstructlon" of units, as used herein, means restoring the improvements to substantially
the eame conditlon ln whlch they exleted prior to the damage with each unlt having the same boundaries as before.
(b) If the lnsurance proceede are lnsufficient to repalr or reconatruct any damaged unltr such damage or deEtructlon shall be pronptly repaired and reconstructed by the owner uslng t,he lnsurance proceede and the proceeds of a
special-asseaament against the owners of the damaged unlt.
Any euch assessnente ehall be egual to the anount by whlch the cost of reconstruction or repair of the unlt exceeds the
sum of the lnsurance proceeds allocable to such unit. Such assessment shall be due and payable not sooner than thirty (301 dayg after wrltten notlce thereof. The special
asaeaament provldled for hereln shalt be a debt- of each owner
and a llen on hla parcel and the lmprovements hereon and nay be enforced and collected by foreclosure proceedings in t,he Courts.
DAMqcE TO COUMON AREA. fn the event of danage or destruction to all or a portlon of the Comnon Area due to flre or other dleaster; the lngurance proceeds if sufficlent to reconstruct or repalr the damage, ghall be applied by the
owners to such reconstructlon and repalr. If the lnsurance proceeds-with respect to such Comnon-Area darnage or deetructlon are lneufflclent to repalr and reconstruct the
damaged or destroyed Connon Area, the owners shall conslder a speclal assessnent. If such assessment ls approved by both ownersr the owners shall make such assessment and
proceed to make such repairs or reconstruction. If such
aaseasment ls not approvedr the insurance proceeds may be applled ln accordance with the wlehes of bhe owners, unless
nade Jolntly payable to the owners and the first nortgagees of thelr respectlve parcels, lf any. The assessrnen! as to
each owner and parcel shall be equal to the assessment agalnst every other onner and parcel. Such assessment shall
be due and payable not sooner than thlrty (30) days after wrltten notlce thereof. The asseesment provlded for herein shall be a debt of each owner and a llen on his parcel and,
Bhe Inprovementa thereon and may be enforced and collected by foreclosure proceedings ln the Courts.
RIGHT TO LIEN. 8. If an owner, at any tlme, shall neglect,or refuae to perform or pay his share of any obllgatlon requlred hireunderr the other owner nay, but shall not be obllgated to, after 20 daye written notlce unless the clrcumstanceg requlre lnnediate actionr nake such payment or, on behalf of such other owner, expend such sum as nay be necessary to perforn such obligation includingl but not llnltett to, the paynent of any lneurance premiums
required hereunder or the undertaklng of any work reguired
hereunder for repair, restoratlon or malntenance, and such other omer ehall have an easenent ln and to that part of
euch def,aultlng ownerfe unit as is reasonably necessary for
such repalr, reetoration or mainteDanc€.
(b) All sums so pald or expended by Bo otrn€rr wlth tntereet thereon at the rate of 18 percent per year
from the date of such payment or expenditurer shall be
payable by the owner so failing to perform (the "defaulting owner") upon demand of the other ovrner.
(c) All suns ao denanded but unpald by the defaultlng owner shall constltute a lien oir ttre irnit of the defaultlng onner ln favor of the other owner prior to all other llens and encurnbrancesr ercept: (i) ltins for taxes and.epeclal assegenente;_andr (it)-the itin of any firsi nortgage- or_firgt deed of trust oi record encumbeiing such unlt. The llen shall abtach from the date when ir,e inp.ia sum ehall becone due and nay be foreclosed ln rike nanner as a nortgage- on real property upon the recordlns of a notice or claim'thereof executed by-!h9 nondefaultln! owner setting forth the amount of the unpild lndebtednesg, €he narne of th6 defaultlng-ornerr-and_a-deicrlption of the unit. In any such foreclosure_the defaurt{ng orner shall be requlred to pay the costs and expengee of euch proceedlnge, fn'ciuoinl-reasonable attorneyt- fees.
(dl The llen provlded for hereln ehall be gubordlnate to the llen of any flrst mortgage or deed of trustr_ lncludlng atl addltlonll advances €tr6reon. sare or transfer of any unlt as the reeurt of court foreclosure of a nortgage, forecloeure through the publlc trustee, or any proceedlng ln lleu of foreclosure, shall ertlnguish the'lten or such asseasments a8 to paynents thereof uhiah becone due prior to euch sale or tranifer, but shall not relie"e ini--
lgtTgl.or"?I oF pereonal liabtiity therefor. rhe nortgalee of such unlt who acqulres title bi way of foreclosure or-the !?fl:tg of a deed ln lieu thereofr-ehail not trowtver, be
*laPle for any past due assesanent and shall only become rlaDre ror f,uture assessments on the date it becomes the omer of such unlt. No sale or transfer sharl relieve such unlt fron ltabtlity fo-r any_asEeaanents therearter uecornint due or from the tlcn thereof. rn the event of the sale or-transfer of a unit with respect to whlch suns shall be unpald by a defaultlng ornei, ercept transfere to a first mortg?geg tn connection wlth a foriclosure of its lien or a dleed ln lleu tbereofr the purchaeer or other transferee of an lntereat ln auch unit slrall be Jointly and-severafiy --
llable wlth the selter or transferor theieof for any sich ,unpald suna.
(e) Upon written requeet of any otrner, nortgagee,ptospecElve nortgagee, purchaeer or other prospective -
transferee of a unitr the owner of the othlr uirtt shatt lesue a wrltten statement eettlng forth ttre arnount he is owed under. thle paragraph, lf ani, with respect to euch unlE. such statenent is blndlng upon the eiecutlng owner in favor of any person who may reli tlereon ln good faith.u?l99s g.lequest for such statement shall be-complied wlth wlthln frfteen daya-after recelpt thereofr all uirpaid sums wlfgb became due prlor to the dite of naking such'request shall be subordlnltea to the lien or other inteiest oe tne person requestlng such statenent.
ANMINISTRATION AIID UANAGEIIEIIT
adminlstratlon and management of thl obligatlo hereunder. However, ln-tbe event both owiers cannot mutually-agree- when a decision ie requlrecl by this Declaration, the lmpassee shall be resolved ie follors:
- (a! Declslon regulred ln year 1986 ancl every agcond year thereafter: parcel A ownerrs declslon ie -
blnding.
_ (b, Declslon regulred ln year I9g7 and every second year thereafter: parcel g ownerrs decielon is -
blnding.
I
oVERRIDE. In the event any owner bellevesr based on the Etandard of the reasonable man, (i, that an lnpasse declelon hae been made incorrectly or contrary to the Declaratlon as (tt) that the onnei ln ult,lnate control is gullty of, mis-r mal-, or non-feaaance with respect to this Declaration then the aggrieved owner may petition the Eagle
County District Court for judlcial deternination of the
controversy which declsion shall be binding upon both or{ners. The Court may assese costs and any reasonable attorney fees ae may have been lncurred by the parties based
upon the merlts of the case.
UsE RFS'FRIC'FTOIIS. (a) Each unlt shalt be restrtcted to a residentlal dwelling ae a permitted use, and such use as well as conditloned and accessory uses shalt be defined by the Town of Vall and Zonlng Restrlctlong and Covenants Vall Vtllage, Sixth Ftltng, Vail, Eagle County, Colorado.
(bl No exterior nounted radiol shortwave,televlelon or other type of antenna whatsoever or tank of
any kln, elther elevated or burled, or clothesline or incineratot".of any klnd whateoever or outslde storage of any personal property shall be permitted or malntained on either unit without the prlor written approval of both onners.
(cl No anlmals shall be kept or malntained in, on or upon elther unit, except that each owner rnay keep and naintain within hie unit one domesticated dog and,/or one
doneetlcated cat; providedl however, that euch donesticated anlnals are kept under control at all tlrnesr do not presenb
a nuieance to the other owner and are kept controlled in strict conpliance with all County of Eagle ordinances that
may apply to such anLmals.
(d) In atlditlon to the parking restrictlons set forth ln subparagraph LANDSCAPING, SERVICE FACILITIES AND
PARKING (c) above, each owner may keep no nore than two
automotlve vehlcles permanently on Parcel E. Parking of ,boatsr trallere, campera, notor hones, ATVg or recreational vehiclee on either unit ls expresely prohibited. Parking of
more than two automotive vehlcles by either ovrner or his family, agent or invltee on Parcel E for more than a 48 hour period ls expreesly prohibited.
(e) No "tine sharlng", ilnterval ownership" or similar lnterest, whereby owneiship of, a unlt is shared by
owners on a tlne baslgr ahall be egtabllehed on either unit wlthout tbe prlor written approval of both owners and all llenore holding a first, mortgage or flrst deed of trust of record on any portlon of Parcel A or Parcel B, which
approval ehall be reflected ln a document of record.
NOTICE. Each owner shall reglster its rnailing address with the owner and all notices or denands intended to be gerved upon owners shall be sent by certifled maill postage prepaidl addressed ln the name of the owner at such registered mailing address. In the alternative, notices may
be dellvered lf in writing, personally to onnera.
DURATION OF DECLARATTON. Each provislon contalned in this Oeclaration which is subject to the laws or rules
sometltnes referred to aB the rule agalnst perpetuitles or the rule prohlbiting unreasonable restraints on alienation shall continue and renain ln full force and effect for the period oE 2l years following the death of Roger V. Cadol and Sally M. Cadoll or until thls peclaration is terminated as
hereinafter protided, whlchever first occurs. Atl. other provlsions contained in this Declaratlon shall continue and
renain ln full force and effect unt,ll January I,2015 A.D.,
^,'ln-
and thereafter for successlve perlods of l0 years each;unless at least I year prior to January lr 2025 A.D.; or at least I year prtol to the expiratlon of any such 10 year period of, extended durationl thls Declarat-lon ls terrninated by recorded instrumentr- dtrectlng termlnation, signed by all
owners and all lienors holdllng a-flrst mortgage oi firsL
deed of trust of record on any portlon of piriel A or parcel
B.
rMnNFilr:rltn oR RFVOCATTOTI. Thls Declaration may be
anended or revoked only upon unanlmous written approval in recordable forn of all ohrners and all llenors holding a flret mortgage or flrst deed of trust of record on any portlon of Parcel A or parcel B.
EFFECT OE pROVISIONS OF DECLARATION. Each provlslon of thls Declaration, and agreementr promleel covenant and undertaklng to conply with each piovislon of this Declarationr and any neceseary exceptlon or reservation or grant of, tltle, eetater rlght or inLerest to effectuate any provislon of thle Declaration: (f) ghall be deemed lncorporated in each deed or other instrunent by whlch any rlght, tltle or interest in any portion of parcil A or Parcel B ls granted, devlsed or conveyed, whether or not set forth or referred to ln such deed or other lnstrumenti (ti)shallr by virtue of acceptance of any rtght, title or lntereet ln any portlon of Parcel A or Parcel B by an orrner,be deened accepted, ratifledl adopted and declared as a personal covenant of such owner and, as a personal covenant.,ehall be bindlng on such onner and his helrs, personal
representativee, auccessors and aseigns; and shall be deemed a peraonal covenant to, wlth and for the benefit of each
owner of any portion of Parcel A or parcel B; and (iii)ahall be deemed a real covenant by Declarants, for
t,henselvear thelr helrg, peraonal- repres€ntatives,
succeBsora and assl.gns, and aleo an eguitable servitude,running' ln each case, ag a burden wlth and upon the title to each and every portlon of Parcel A and parcel B. '
_ ENF9RCEMENT AND REilEprES. (a) Each proviEion of this Declaration shall be enforceable by any owner by a proceeding for a prohlbitlve or manaatory lnJun-tion or by a sult or actlon to recover danages. If court proceedings are lnstltuted in connectlon with €he rlghts of eiforcemenf and remedleg provlded ln this Declarat,lon, the prevalling party sball be entltled to recover its costs and expenses in-
connectLon therewlth, includlng reasonable atlorney fees.
(b) Each owner hereby agrees that any and all actions in equlty or at law which ire instituted to enforce any provigion hereunder shall be brought ln and only in the Distrlct Court of Eagle County, State of Colorado.
(c) Failure to enforce any provision of this Declaratlon ehall not operate as a walver of any such provialon, the right to enforce such provision thereafter,or of any other provislon of this Declaration.
EXERCISE OF RIGHTS. Any exercise of any right granted
hereunder by one olrner with respect to the other orner rs
unit including but not limited to the use of any easement granted herein shall be exerclsed ln a manner which shall not unreasonably hinder, impede or impose upon such other
ordner's u6e of his unit.
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. Except as otberwise provided hereinr this Declaratlon shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of each owner and the
t0
,:f-.
helrar peraonal representatlvesl succeggors and aeslgne of
each.
-SEITERABILTF!. fnvalldfty or unenforceablllty of any
Brovlelons of thls Declaratlon ln uhole or tn parl sball-not effect the valldtlty or enforceiable part of a piovlalon of thls Declaratlon.
-eAP4r?oNs. _ The captlone and headlnga ln thls lnstrunent are for convenlence only and shall not be conaldered in construlng any provlslone of thlg Declaratl.on.
the nagcullne of any rord used ln-thlg Decl.aratlon shalt Lnclude, tbe fenlnlne or neuter genderr and tbe slngular the plural and vlce versa.
lN WIINESS !{HEREOF Declarante has erecuted this Declaratlon thl.s ..7 day of S4otaaau r 1995.
')
ROGER V.
lozrt @4a- -t ut
STATE OP €EI'oRIDE
COU!'I[I OP
- Subecrlbed and sworn to Aaratad-r 1985 by Roger V.
Itltnese ny hand andl offlclal seal.
&{y cdnnlsalon explrea onr /S S.f St
I ) ss.
before
Cadol
day of
adol .
-3 yll.c me thls
and Sall
ll
.r$r
75 soulh frontage road
uail, colorado 8'1657
(303) 476-7000
August 30, 1985
Ross Davis, Jr
Attorney at Law
Vail National Bank B1dg.
Suite 307 Vail, Co. 81657
Re: Va j I Vi 'l I age 6th , Lot 6, Bl ock 2
Dear Ross:
olflce of communlty development
Both Public llorks and the Pl anning Departnent have reviewed the plat
for the resubdivision of Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Village 6th Filing. I
am requesting that you add additional wording in the a'lteration, maintenance
and repairs section of the declaration that would require both owners to paint the exterior of both units at the same time. The reason for
this request is that our department has had many complaints from residents
concerning primary/secondary units that are not repainted at the same tine. If you would please add this additjonal wording to the maintenance
section, our office will then be able to quickly sign off on this resub-
division.
Please contact me if you have any further questions.
Sincerely,
Krrhn [,h
Kristan Pritz
Town P'lanner
KP/b1f
APPLICATION FOR
DUPLEX SUBDIVISION REVIEl^l
{*}['s.-b-,-R.oo ,Lt-L Oltiq [o-
; Caob-t-A.
B.
D.
NAME OF
MILING
NAME OF
MAILING
APPL ICANT
ADDRESS
APPL ICANT' S REPRESENTATI VE
ADDRESS YaJ-Cl . B trro
PH0NEjl_?":A{&_b__
C. NAME OF PROPERTY OWNE Crrlcrl + firtrs. Sull
PHONE q i
fo1 lowing the requirements
and l4 of the Subdivision
BlocK;t_sueorvrsror VarL VLLI-c-4,i rnrne U
-rov E,FEE $loo.00 PAID
MATERIAL TO BE SUBMITTED 'I I : I.:
'1 . Two mylar copies of the duplex subdivision p'l at of Section .l7.16130(C) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,.l0,1i,.|3
Regul ations.
2. The plat must contajn the following statement:
G.
1 "For zoning purposes, the two'lots created by this subdjvision are to I be treated as one entity wjth nc more than one two-family residence allowed i on the cbmbined areas o? fhe two lots." The staterirent m-ust tre modified i according to the number of lots created. -...,.
:
3. A copy of the declarations and/or covenants proposed to assure the maintenance of any common areas.
APPROVAL PROCESS, REVIEt,l CRITERIA
These can be found in Chapter 17.24 of the Subdivision Regulations.
FILING AND RECORDING
The Department of Conmunity Development will be responsible for promptly recording
the plat and accompany'ing documents with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder
upon Town of Vail approval .
X owr'rEn's sIGNATURE
MAILING ADDRESS (
LOCATION
LOT L
OF PROPOSAL
H.
Ross Davis, Jr.
Attorney at Law
Ross Davis, Jr.
Cyrus G. Allen III
Jacqueline A. Flater
Suite 307
Vail National Bank Bldg.
P.O. Box 190
Vail, Colorado 81658
Telephone:
.3O3J 476-2414
August 26, 1985
Planning Department
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Rd.Vail, CO 81658
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed herewith please find a Mylar Plat, and Party Wall
Agreement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and
Reservations for a Resubdivision of Lot 6 ' Block 2, VaiI
Village, Sixth Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle county, Colorado.
Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $100.00.
Anything you could do to expedite this application would be
greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have
any questions please contact my office.
RD: ns
Enclosures
Sincer
a
PROJECT:
DATE SUBMITTEd: J\rr,r.
C0I'{{ENTS NEEDED ByJ
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
FIRE DEPARTMENT
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVI El.l
OF PUBLIC
Reviewed by:
Comments:
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comnents:
Date
RECREATION DEPARTI4ENT
Reviewed by:
Comments:
PUBLIC HO
Reviewed by:
Comments:
t/
su6 e,/27/8r
/t
Date
Date
t 'i+ I c.' l Project Application
,1 i')"-, v 7.-t x Proiect Name:
; t: t1 '
project Descrip r'on. lt't i'' 'l'-' .'l':"' t'or" J'r ft:-ti -+ K o'., ,"/n^i,4-
contactpersonandenon" :.,,,' .;t,,,! 'iL,'.tri7i. iD,,'rf r'ill91/t/
Owner. Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot l/ , Block
J--Comments:fj.u-/ t,t.{e i
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
Stafl Approval
I (l
Project Name:a
Project Application
Project Descrip1166, 'l ''":Ii tif ,i I ' :'v i t \'
- ') t,/;
,l
Contact Person and Phone
I
I
t
Legal Description: Lot r-. Block
Comments:
Filing , Zone
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
f- . 'l ., iu,,,.. , t p-"
Summarv: t(tLlq It ""lI / '
'<"ff ,1,- i, I;,t;:,, !' ', i.. i
'il-':: '
|h
Project Apptication fO
Prolect Name:
Project Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
>^J
'o'Yon (a,
-7s/{
Li&
t -'2
Legal Descriptio n: tot (P , Blocu L 64^
Zonei
Zoning
Design Review Board
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
|r
sFR,
zor,tE cllEcK
. for R, R P/S ZONE DISTRICTS
tega'l
0uner
GRFA:
GRFA:
Proposcd
Propc:ed
Actual
./
Sl ope / fu'4o /|y'.
i
t
Description: Lot Z-ehck 7 Filine l/!, ' I Lr / il+
Architect tt/S
Proposed Use !
Sides-Required l5' Proposed
Rear -Required 15' Propo sed {/t-
llaterccurse-required 5()' Proposed
At'towed i 44Zd . Propo:',ed ' 22.
-
Primarry A'll owed Z -4 5 Primary Proposed
Secondary Al]oried t 31: secondary Proposed 'n ', ,
-Site Coverage: Alloired Zr,"/" = 38{/ Proposed 21.?L= dZ
Landscaping: Requirea' (ri'')o ,-L
Parking:
Drive: Slope Pernitted f7a sIoPe
.Av,.:'lanche /U
, t./ l Flood pl ain /Vfl
iorments:
Z(rring:
TINIA
L
LS
D
NAME OF otncr 60& &&E(
LE.AL D'scRrPrro* O t*
DESCRIP'TION OF PROJECT
"to* (e& lrtr,'r{
The
to
A.)
fo 1 lowin g
the Design
BUILDING
Roof
Siding
Other Wall
I'asci a
Sof flts
Wlndows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trin
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
TJ.ashings
Cbi.nneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
informat ion
Review Board
MATERIALS:
ls requlred for submittal by the Applicant before a final- approval san be given.
Type of Material Color
zdud
p/r
17
p.) pLANr MATERTALS fuz*j -re Craan"a6 /z/i 4/t=/e t (Vegetative,-Landsiaping Materials incruding'Trees, dntrr6",' "and Ground Cover)
Botanical Name
&___7&n.2a.%aavs
Corrnon l.lame
8p/4'
6/e6/
QuanEitv
4?p
a .2/
Size
54/.,Ma
il
Cmon Name Quantltv Slze
!I.ANDSCAPE FEATI'RES
alnLng llalle', Fences,Swiming Poole , etc. )
n l
L)u Project Name:
Proiect Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and phone: JO I q P" t /(' o '
ption: Lot I Descri Legal
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board lz- 3
Date
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Chief Building Off icial
;-
Project Application
Co{./
Proiect Name:
Proiect DescriPtion:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Descriptio n: tot 6 ,Blocx )'- ,,,,^n ? U L - 1
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
'z^znurut#IAPPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Chief Building Official
a
z0t{E cH[cK
for
SFR, R, R P/S ZONE DISTRICTS
Legal
Owner
Zone
Description:
0koos
Secondary Proposed // 73,{
t/*
Landscaping:
Parking:
Required tP:k
Propos ed
Proposcd
Propc: ed
ActuaI
/,Required /LLntt'4 ,4,
Drive: Slope Permitted f,?o Slope
Environmental,/Hazarcls: Ava.'lanche tUA
F'lood Pi ain d/4'
Sl ope d /c-
Conments:( r(/. f,a /{u
l'I,.'.vJ -lrD-fl&
Lot Area )q 4t Height Allorved 30' Proposed _---...7.+6b
Setbacks: Front-Requircd 20i"-Proposed
Sides-Required l5' Proposed
Rear -Requirecl l5 ' Pr.:posed
l{atercourse-required -6' Proposed _
GRFA: A1toned i41t7?F ,propo:ed
GRFA:Primary nuovt&bt|S Primary Proposed /7?3,E
Lot h l,ocx Z -Filins Vl *o
Architect
District' 'K P _Proposed Use
,[
Secondary nlovte$13!1
Site Coverage: Alloled 7c'',/c
Zoning: Approved/Disapproved
'
i
'Zon i ng 'in i strator
. +rin t- i.
- -r; 'a
' t' tL Project Application
on I cr/z tr /YC' '
F:r's
{
Project Name:
Proiect Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architecr Address and phone: ''\,'1,^ () * , l' , , ', ' W3s/ {
Legal Description' 1-e1 d , Block Filing
Zoning Approved:
Deslgn Review Board
,^," rtfsfrd ,
DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
Chief Building Official
Date:
l| Ftrlrt/v.d
Project Application
Proiect Name:
Prolect Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot , Block c Filing
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
Date
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
Date:
Chief Building Ofticial