HomeMy WebLinkAboutPEC120003 PEC120024 PEC memo_052112 TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: May 21 , 2012 SUBJECT: A request for a variance from Section 14 -6 -7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 14 -1 -5, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allo w for deviations from the retaining wall height limits, located at 530, 540, and 580 South Frontage Road East (Ford Park)/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120024) A request for the review of amendments to a conditional use perm it, pursuant to Section 12 -16 -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of various improvements at Ford Park (realignment of athletic fields, new restroom and concession buildings, new covered outdoor terrace, Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater renovations, park entrance improvements, Betty Ford Alpine Garden welcome center, streetscape improvements, etc.) located at 530, 540, and 580 South Frontage Road East/ Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto.. (PEC120003) Appl icant: Town of Vail Planner: Bill Gibson I. SUMMARY The applicant, the Town of Vail, is requesting a final review of a retaining wall height variance and amendments to the Ford Park conditional use permit . The proposed variance and conditional use permit amendments are intended to facilitate construction of the first phase of projects at Ford Park funded by the re -allocation of conference center funds approved by the Vail electorate in the 2011 election. The proposed amendments to the Ford Park conditi onal use permit are consistent with the Ford Park Man agement Plan recently reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission and updated by the Vail Town Council on April 17, 2012, by the adoption of Resolution No. 17, Series of 2012. The applicant is no longer requesting a variance from the parking lot landscape area requirements. The applicant is not proposing conditional use permit amendments for a covered outdoor terrace or a garden welcome center at this time.
Town of Vail Page 2 Based upon Staff’s review of the cr iteria outlined in Section s VII and VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends approval , with a condition , of both application s subject to the findings noted in Section IX of this memor andum. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST T he subject variance and conditional use permit amendment ap plications are intended to facilitate the construction of park improvements funded by the November 8, 2011, election. The proposed variance and conditional use permit amendments are proposed by the Town of Vail in collaboration with the Vail Recreation Di strict, Vail Valley Foundation, and Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. The applicant, the Town of Vail, is requesting a variance to allow for the construction of a retaining wall with an exposed face in excess of 6 feet in height. The proposed 14.5 foot tall retaining wall will be located d irectly below the re -aligned East Betty Ford Way east of the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater loading dock . The existing 12 .5 foot tall boulder retaining wall supporting East Betty Ford Way in this location is legally non -conforming in regard to the wall heigh t limits prescribed by Section 14 -6 -7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code. The applicant is also proposing amendments to the Ford Park conditional use permit to allow for the construction of the following improvements at Ford Park: Landscape and Pedestriani zation Improvements • Upgrading of walkways from Frontage Road t ransit/parking areas into Park • West Betty Ford Way - path widening, new path surface, seating and lighting • East Betty Ford Way - path widening, re -grading to lower slope of path, new path sur face, seating and lig hting, overlooks to Gore Creek • Landscape improvements throughout Park • Creek bank restoration/enhancement below (parking lot) Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater • Re -design of lawn seating area • New east restrooms and u pgrading of existing re strooms • Garden Overlook Terrace (within Amphitheater) to Alpine Gardens Athletic Fields • Re -configured/expand athletic fields and associated retaining wall, seati ng, fencing, landscaping, etc. • New bathrooms and concession building at east end of fields • New west bathrooms and maintenance/storage building (for VRD and Alpine Garden) Betty Ford Alpine Garden • North entry to Garden
Town of Vail Page 3 Transit/Parking/Service • Dedicated bus stop (and shelter) along Frontage Road (location of shelter is proposed at this tim e, architectural design of shelter to be provided for PEC review at lat er date) • Re -configured parking lot, new ac cess points with Frontage Road • Improved storm water d rainage system for parking lot • Centralized trash facility (location of facility is propo sed at this time, architectural design of shelter to be provided for PEC review at later date) • New sewer line on west end of Park and new water line from Tennis Center to Amph itheater along East Betty Ford • Improved loading/delivery to the Amphitheater by designing East Betty Ford Way such that this corridor can accommodate trucks/deliveries A vicinity map (Attachment A), the applicant’s request (Attachment B), and revised development plans (Attachment C) have been attached for review. The Ford Park Man agement Plan as u pdated on April 17, 2012 (Attachment D) has been attached for reference . III. BACKGROUND Ford Park is located within the General Use (GU) District. Ford Park (i.e. “p ublic and private parks and active outdoor recreation areas, facilities, an d uses”) is a conditional use in the General Use District. The development standards of the General Use District are prescribed by the Planning and Environmental Commission as part of its review of conditional use permit applications. On November 8, 20 11, the Town of Vail electorate approved ballot question #1 which stated: “Without increasing taxes, shall the Town of Vail use the remainder of the one and one -half percent lodging tax revenues and one -half percent sales tax revenues collected from Janua ry 1, 2003 through December 31, 2005 to fund the following projects that will promote recreation, promote tourism and support the economy in the Town of Vail: Expansion and improvement of the clubhouse at the Vail Golf Course and Nordic Center, including multi -use community space; Field expansion and restroom renovation at the Ford Park Sports Complex; and Ford Amphitheater improvements, including outdoor seating and restroom improvements?” On April 9, 2012, the Planning and Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council for amendments to the Ford Park
Town of Vail Page 4 Management Plan. These amendments were in response to the November 8, 2011, election which re -allocated conference center funds to Ford Park and Vail Golf Course projects. On April 17 , 2012, the Vail Town Council adopted Resolution No. 17, Series of 2012, to amend the Ford Park Manageme nt Plan. The proposed variance and conditional use permit amendments are intended to facilitate the first phase of construction projects at Ford Park. On April 18, 2012, the Design Review Board conceptually reviewed the proposed Ford Park improvements. Final review by the Board will be scheduled at a future public hearing. On May 14, 2012, the Planning and Environmental Commissioner held a work session at its public hearing to discuss the proposed conditional use permit amendment application. The appli cant had made revisions to the proposed development plan (Attachment C) in response to input from that hearing. IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Staff believes that the following provisions of the Vail Town Code are relevant to the review of this prop osal: Zoning Regulations (Title 12) Chapter 12 -1: TITLE, PURPOSE, AND APPLICABILITY (in part) Section 12 -1 -2: Purpose A. General: These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town, an d to promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of high quality. B. Specific: These regulations are intended to achieve the following more specific purposes: 1. To provide for adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities. 2. To secure safety from fire, panic, flood, avalanche, accumulation of snow, and other dangerous conditions. 3 . To promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and to lessen congestion in the streets.
Town of Vail Page 5 4. To promote adequate and appropriately located off street parking and loading facilities. 5. To conserve and maintain established comm unity qualities and economic values. 6. To encourage a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consistent with municipal development objectives. 7. To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land with structu res. 8. To safeguard and enhance the appearance of the town. 9. To conserve and protect wildlife, streams, woods, hillsides, and other desirable natural features. 10. To assure adequate open space, recreation opportunities, and other amenities and facil ities conducive to desired living quarters. 11. To otherwise provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community. Article 12 -9C: General Use District (in part) Section 12 -9C -1: Purpose The general use district is intended to provide sites for pub lic and quasi -public uses which, because of their special characteristics, cannot be appropriately regulated by the development standards prescribed for other zoning districts, and for which development standards especially prescribed for each particular d evelopment proposal or project are necessary to achieve the purposes prescribed in section 12 -1 -2 of this title and to provide for the public welfare. The general use district is i ntended to ensure that public buildings and grounds and certain types of quasi -public uses permitted in the district are appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and, in the case of buildings and other structures, to ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of uses. Section 12 -9C -5: Development Standards A. Prescribed By Planning And Environmental Commission: In the gene ral use district, development standards in each of the following categories shall be as prescribed by the planning and environmental commission: 1. Lot area and site dimensions. 2. Setbacks. 3. Building height. 4. Density control.
Town of Vail Page 6 5. Site coverage. 6. Lan dscaping and site development. 7. Parking and loading. B. Reviewed By Planning And Environmental Commission: Development standards shall be proposed by the applicant as a part of a conditional use permit application. Site specific development standards sh all then be determined by the planning and environmental commission during the review of the conditional use request in accordance with the provisions of chapter 16 of this title. Cha pter 12 -16: Conditional Use Permits (in part) Section 12 -16 -1: Purpose; Limitations: In order to provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of this title, specified uses are permitted in certain districts subject to the granting of a co nditional use permit. Because of their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require review so that they may be located properly with respect to the purposes of this title and with respect to their effects on surrounding properties. The re view process prescribed in this chapter is intended to assure compatibility and harmonious development between conditional uses and surrounding properties in the Town at large. Uses listed as conditional uses in the various districts may be permitted subj ect to such conditions and limitations as the Town may prescribe to insure that the location and operation of the conditional uses will be in accordance with the development objectives of the Town and will not be detrimental to other uses or properties. W here conditions cannot be devised, to achieve these objectives, applications for conditional use permits shall be denied. Chapter 12 -17: VARIANCES (in part) 12 -17 -1: Purpose: Reasons for Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary p hysical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reas on for granting a variance. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (Title 14) Chapter 14 -2, DEFINITIONS (in part)
Town of Vail Page 7 PUBLIC WAY: Any public street, easement, right of way, highway, alley, way, place, road or bike path, and any nonexclusive utility easement. STREET, PRIVATE: Any street not dedicated to the public for purposes of vehicular or pedestrian use. STREET, PUBLIC: A . The entire width between the boundary lines of every way publicly maintained when any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular or pedestrian travel; B. The entire width of every way declared to be a public highway by any l aw of this state; and further classified and defined as follows: 1. Arterial Streets: Those which permit the relatively rapid and unimpeded movement of large volumes of traffic from one part of the community to another. 2. Collector Streets: Those which collect traffic from minor streets and carry it to arterial streets or to local traffic generators. Collector streets include the principal entrance streets to a residential development, those linking such adjacent developments, and those streets providing circulation within such developments. 3. Minor Streets: Those used primarily for direct access to properties abutting the right of way. Minor streets carry traffic having an origin or destination within the development and do not carry through traffic. Chapter 14 -6: GRADING STANDARDS (in part) Chapter 14 -6 -7: Retaining Walls (in part) A. G eneral: All retaining walls are reviewed by the design review board or the administrator to determine compatibility to the existing topography and the materials in use . Retaining walls shall not exceed an expos ed face height of six feet (6').W ithin a front setback, retaining walls shall not exceed an exposed face height of three feet (3'), unless related to access to a structure constructed on excessive slopes (in exces s of 30 percent). Retaining walls associated with a street located within a public right of way or access to an underground covered parking structure are exempt from these height limits, but must be approved by the de sign review board. VAIL LAND USE PLAN Goal 1. General Growth/Development 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident.
Town of Vail Page 8 1.2 The quality of the env ironment including air, water and other natural resources should be protected as the Town grows. 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing de veloped areas (infill areas). 1.13 Vail recognizes its stream tract as being a desirable land feature as well as its potential for public use. Goal 2. Skier /Tourist Concerns 2.1The community should emphasize its role as a destination resort while acc ommodating day visitors. 2.4 The community should improve summer recreational options to improve year -round tourism. 2.5 The community should improve non -skier recreational options to improve year -round tourism. 2.7 The Town of Vail should improve the e xisting park and open space lands while continuing to purchase open space. Goal 6. Community Services 6.1 Services should keep pace with increased growth. 6.2 The Town of Vail should play a role in future development through balancing growth with servic es. 6.3 Services should be adjusted to keep pace with the needs of peak periods. FORD PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN (1997) SECTION 5: GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND ACTION STEPS Goals for Ford Park are summarized in six major goal statements. Each goal statem ent focuses on a particular aspect of Ford Park brought up during the stakeholder and public input portions of the Management Plan process. As one might anticipate, there is a certain amount of overlap between the goal statements. The issues concerning F ord Park are complicated and convoluted as are the solutions to these issues. It is intended that the goal statements be consistent and complementary to each other and be designed to provide a framework, or direction, for the future management of Ford Par k.
Town of Vail Page 9 A series of objectives following each goal statement outline specific steps that can be taken toward achieving each stated goal. Policy statements are intended to guide decision -making in achieving each of the stated objectives in reviewing developmen t proposals and implementing capital improvement projects. Action steps are the final measure in implementing the goal statements. Illustrative plans following the Goals, Objective, and Action Steps are included to help explain the concepts represented by those statements. The illustrations are conceptual and are not to be considered as final design solutions. Goal #1: Preserve and protect Ford Park. Objectives: 1.1: Limit future development. Action Step 1.1.1: Draft a new ordinance to exclude thos e uses listed in Ordinance No.6, Series of 1973, now considered to be inappropriate, and to redefine the allowable uses within Ford Park. Policy Statement 1: The following uses that are allowed and prohibited for Ford Park shall take precedence over Sec tion 18.36.030 of the Municipal Code concerning the General Use Zone District. Allowed Uses • Park and greenbelt • Bicycle and hiking trails • Children’s playground • Outdoor amphitheater • Botanical gardens • Environmental, educational, and historical centers • Picnic areas • Recreation and athletic facilities • Transportation systems and other public utility easements • Parking • Administrative offices Prohibited uses • Ski lift and related facilities • Exchange or trade • Civic center, convention/conference center, public schools , gymnasium, and assembly hall • Swimming pools • Equestrian trails • Type III and IV employee housing
Town of Vail Page 10 Policy Statement 2: New or changed facilities or uses will not be permitted to curtail existing public uses of facilities in the Park unless there is either a compelling public interest or adequate alternative facilities are available to its users. All functions in the park shall be maintained and function at a high quality level. Action Step 1.1.2: Create and attach plan sheets which outline lease areas, r eferred to as Exhibit A in the Vail Recreation District lease agreement and Exhibit B in the Vail Valley Foundation lease agreement, but which were never attached. Policy Statement 3: The existing variety of uses and facilities in the Park will be preser ved. The Town will not enter into a lease agreement with any party that does not currently hold such an agreement, hereby maintaining current leaseholder status to: Vail Valley Foundation, Vail Alpine Garden Foundation, and Vail Recreation District, or the ir successors. 1.2: Refine criteria for evaluating future development proposals. Action Step 1.2.1: Update the Design Criteria and Site Guidelines included in the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan by: a) Creating additional development guidelines for undergr ound, low visual impact type structures, enhanced landscaping, and full and complete impact mitigation. b) Enforcing existing criteria and guidelines to solve and/or avoid problems associated with development projects within Ford Park. 1.3: Designate Pr eservation Zones within Ford Park to protect sensitive natural areas and/or buffer zones between venues areas from developmental impacts. Define allowed uses within Preservation Zone areas. Action Step 1.3.1: Define criteria for designating Preservatio n Zones and their uses within Ford Park. For example, significant native vegetation, wildlife habitat, and wetlands may be criteria for designating sensitive natural areas, while grade separations and dense landscape plantings may be criteria for designat ing sensitive buffer zones. Action Step 1.3.2: Delineate Preservation Zones within Ford Park. Policy Statement 4: All proposed development projects shall be reviewed for compliance with Design Criteria and Site Guidelines, as well as other Town regulat ions, and shall be additionally judged according to the recreational, educational or social benefit they bring to the community.
Town of Vail Page 11 Policy Statement 5: Functions that do not maintain high standards of quality or that diminish the experience of park users, wi ll not be permitted. Policy Statement 6: The historic qualities and natural character of the Nature Center are to be maintained. 1.4: Enhance use and preservation of the Historic School House. Action Step 1.4.1: Negotiate a contract with the Vail Alpi ne Garden Foundation to open the School House for public visitation and to perform preservation activities of photographs and artifacts. Action Step 1.4.2: Make physical improvements to the school house to enhance lighting, public access and viewing areas . Goal #2: Reduce vehicular intrusions in, and their impact on, the park. Objectives: 2.1: Reduce the demand for vehicular intrusions into the park. Action Step 2.1.1: Provide additional on -site storage facilities within the Amphitheater, Alpine Garden and Recreation District areas to reduce and control the frequency of delivery and service vehicle intrusions into the park. Action Step 2.1.2: Improve traffic gate operations and restrictions on both the east and west access roads to eliminate unnecess ary and unauthorized vehicular intrusions into the park. Action Step 2.1.3: Construct a central trash collection facility, accessible from the South Frontage Road, to be used by all leaseholders within the park for the disposal of trash, landscape debris, and recyclables. Policy Statement 7: Vehicular encroachment into the park will be minimized. The only vehicular uses allowed in the park are for: maintenance; delivery of goods and materials too large or heavy to be carried by non -motorized means; ac cess for people with disabilities or limited mobility; public transportation; and emergency services. 2.2: Reduce the conflicts between vehicles and park users. Action Step 2.2.1: Coordinate delivery schedules to reduce the frequency of delivery and ser vice vehicle intrusions into the park during peak use time periods. Action Step 2.2.2: Improve loading dock facilities in the Amphitheater to expedite the unloading and setup for performances and to reduce the need for large vehicle parking outside of th e Amphitheater area.
Town of Vail Page 12 Action Step 2.2.3: Improve the configuration of the east access road to allow use by large delivery vehicles, thus reducing the overall number of trips on the west access road and the need for the backing and turning of large vehicle s on the lower bench of the park. Goal #3: Reduce conflicts between all Ford Park venues. Objectives: 3.1: Coordinate events on all Ford Park venues. Action Step 3.1.1: Expand the master schedule kept by the Town Clerk to include all venues within t he park. Action Step 3.1.2: Hold preseason and monthly event/activity coordination meetings. Action Step 3.1.3: Hold semiannual (2x per year) coordination and input meetings with the Town Administrators, leaseholder representatives, and neighborhood and adjacent property owner representatives. Policy Statement 8: Overlapping or simultaneous events that exceed the available community parking or other park infrastructure shall be discouraged. Policy Statement 9: No one event or type of use will be allowed to dominate the usage of the Park. Policy Statement 10: The Park is a Town of Vail community facility and in the case of conflicting uses, functions that best serve the interests of the community will have the highest priority. In all cases, fina l decisions regarding the Park rest with the Vail Town Manager. Policy Statement 11: The day -to -day management and coordination of activities in the Park will be assigned to the Park Superintendent. The Park Superintendent will coordinate as necessary w ith a representative of: • the Town of Vail • the Vail Valley Foundation • the Alpine Garden • the Vail Recreation District 3.2: Improve buffers between different use areas within the park. Action Step 3.2.1: Enhance the buffer zone between the softball fields and the amphitheater and gardens by reversing the orientation of the center and east softball fields.
Town of Vail Page 13 Action Step 3.2.2: Enhance existing and new buffer zone areas through the addition of landscape planting. Goal #4: Resolve parking and South Frontage R oad access problems. Objectives: 4.1: Develop and implement a parking management plan for Ford Park. Action Step 4.1.1: Locate a variable message sign between the main roundabout and entrance to Village Structure for the purpose of informing drivers tha t close -in parking at Ford Park is restricted, at a fee, or full, and parking in the VTC is free and shuttle bus service is available. Action Step 4.1.2: Schedule shuttle bus service from top deck of the Village Structure to Ford Park Frontage Road stop f or special event/high demand days. Extend in -town shuttle bus service to Ford Park Vail Valley Drive stop. Action Step 4.1.3: Designate drop -off parking from Frontage Road using 15 spaces north of bus stop. Enforce 5 minute time limit. Drop -off lane functions as a turn around once lot is filled. Schedule attendants on -site to manage drop -off spaces and assist users in loading and unloading. Action Step 4.1.4: Allocate close -in parking on Frontage Road and Vail Valley Drive through reserve ticket pur chases or on a fee basis. Parking attendants on -site to manage entrances and exits. Establish a ticket surcharge or parking fee price schedule which will generate sufficient funds to cover attendant and shuttle bus service costs. Fee parking is to be i n effect for high -parking demand days only. Action Step 4.1.5: Construct Frontage Road sidewalk from the Village Structure and improve sign system as necessary to accommodate pedestrian traffic to Ford Park. Policy Statement 12: Adequate parking for th e needs of the park are to be provided in the park and at the Village Structure. 4.2: Improve vehicular access from the South Frontage Road and improve parking lot design to maximize the number of parking spaces, aesthetics, and safety while mitigating e nvironmental impacts. Action Step 4.2.1: Design and construct improvements to the South Frontage Road to meet CDOT requirements for obtaining a state highway access permit.
Town of Vail Page 14 Action Step 4.2.2: Design and construct improvements to all existing parking area s that maximize the number of parking spaces; provide landscape buffering and treatment of storm water run -off. Goal #5: Improve internal pedestrian circulation within Ford Park and the pedestrian connections between Ford Park and Vail Village. Objective s: 5.1: Improve directional and informational signs to and within Ford Park. Action Step 5.1.1: Develop a comprehensive sign plan to direct Ford Park visitors from central sites in the Vail Village and from each level of the Village Parking Structure to destinations within Ford Park. 5.2: Improve pedestrian routes to Ford Park. Action Step 5.2.1: Design improvements to existing pedestrian routes that will correct grading, surfacing, and lighting and will provide resting and sitting areas. 5.3: Im prove internal pedestrian circulation within Ford Park. Action Step 5.3.1: Design a central pedestrian path to enhance the connection between the upper and lower bench areas of the park. Policy Statement 14: Any uses added to Ford Park in the future sha ll be structured to encourage users or participants to walk or ride the bus rather than drive. Policy Statement 15: Pedestrian access to the Park from the Vail Village should be easy and visible. The Park shall be as pedestrian -friendly as possible. Go al #6: Delineate financial responsibilities among Ford Park leaseholders and the Town of Vail. Objectives: 6.1: Formalize existing division of facility management/operation costs. Action Step 6.1.1: Research current lease, license and use agreements for delineation of financial responsibilities. Action Step 6.1.2: Correct inequities in utility billing procedures and distribution systems, current utility use, and payment relationships. Policy Statement 16: All Ford Park leaseholders and the Town of Vail shall be required to share in common operating costs that benefit the whole
Town of Vail Page 15 park facility and as outlined in current lease or license agreements. These include but are not limited to, electrical charges for pedestrian path and parking lot lighting, trash removal charges, and regular parking lot and pedestrian path maintenance costs. 6.2: Create a cost -sharing agreement for Capital Improvement costs. Action Step 6.2.1: Create a five year capital improvements program for Ford Park. Action Step 6.2.2: Es tablish the benefit/cost relationship for capital projects to determine appropriate cost sharing agreements. Policy Statement 17: Ford Park leaseholders and the Town of Vail desiring to make capital improvements within their respective lease areas shall b e required to provide funding for those improvements and for subsequent modifications to those areas outside of the lease area caused by those improvements. Policy Statement 18: Services, functions, and programs provided by Ford Park leaseholders, by brin ging visitors to the community, generate sales tax revenues which contribute General Fund funding sources. Residents of the community which participate in those programs, contribute to the Real Estate Transfer Tax funding source through real estate transa ctions. Both of these funding sources can be utilized by the Town of Vail to pay for capital projects and improvements within Ford Park, reducing the need for contributions from the leaseholders. V. SITE ANALYSIS Address: 530, 540, and 580 South Front age Road East Legal Description: Unplatted Lot Area: +/- 39 acres (per the Ford Park Management P lan) Zoning: General Use District Land Use Designation: Park Geological Hazards: Gore Cre ek 100 -year floodplain Development Standard Allowed/Required Proposed West Storage/Restrooms Setbacks: North per PEC 50 ft. West per PEC 115 ft. East per PEC > 2,300 ft. South p er PEC 185 ft. Height : per PEC 14’-10” Site Coverage : per PEC 1,785 sq. ft. (+0.001%)
Town of Vail Page 16 Concessions/Restrooms Setbacks: North per PEC 42 ft. West per PEC > 1,100 ft. East per PEC > 1,200 ft. South per PEC > 600 ft. Height : per PEC 13’-6” Site Coverage : per PEC 1,612 sq. ft. (+0.001%) Amphitheater Restrooms Setbacks: North per PEC > 400 ft. West per PEC > 800 ft. East per PEC > 1,300 ft. South per PEC > 300 ft. Height: per PEC 11’-6” Site Coverage : per PEC 981 sq. ft. (+0.001%) VI. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONI NG Land Use Zoning North: I -70/Hwy 6 N/A West: Residential High Density Multiple Family District Stream Tract Natural Area Preservation District Residential SDD #38 East: Golf Course Outdoor Recreation District Residential Two -Family Prima ry/Secondary District South: Residential SDD #2 and SDD #38 Soccer Fields General Use District VII. VARIANCE REVIEW CRITERIA The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by Chapter 12 -17 , Variances, Vail Town Code. 1. The relatio nship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The proposed retaining wall height variance will facilitate the expansion and re -alignment of East Betty Ford Way . The proposed expansion and re -alignment will improve the flow of pedestrians and shuttles between the parking lot and the amphitheater. The proposed expansion and re -alignment will also facilitate the relocat ion of automobile and delivery truck traffic to the east side of the park. The propos ed improvements to East Betty Ford Way will reduce vehicular traffic along West Betty Ford Way and will reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts at the west entrances to the park, the playground area, the open field area, the AIPP public art display area, and t he
Town of Vail Page 17 Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, which Staff finds positively affects the existing and potential park uses and structures in the vicinity . The proposed 14.5 foot tall retaining wall will be located directly below the re -aligned East Betty Ford Way east of th e Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater loading dock. The existing 12.5 foot tall boulder retaining wall supporting East Betty Ford Way in this location is legally non -conforming in regard to the wall height limits prescribed by Section 14 -6 -7, Retaining Walls, Vai l Town Code. Due to the legally non -conforming conditions of the existing retaining wall , Staff does not believe the proposed variance will have a significant negative affect on the existing and potential use and structures in the vicinity in comparison t o existing conditions. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing boulder retaining wall with a new single wall, rather than a series of tiered retaining walls no taller than 6 feet in height. The proposed single wall will create less site distur bance than a tiered wall design . Additionally, t he applicant is proposing to implement BMP’s (best management practices) during the construction of the proposed retaining wall to minimize impacts to the adja cent Gore Creek riparian area from run -off, debr is, sedimentation, etc. Therefore, Staff finds the propose retaining wall height variance is consistent with this review criteria. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is neces sary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege. The proposed 14.5 foot tall retaining wall will be located directly below the re -aligned East Betty Ford Way east of the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater loading dock. The existing 12.5 foot tall boulder retaining wall supporting East Betty Ford Way in this location is legally non -conforming in regard to the wall height limits prescribed by Sectio n 14 -6 -7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code. The proposed retaining wall height variance will facilitate the expansion and re -alignment of East Betty Ford Way consistent with the recommendations of the adopted Ford Park Management Plan. The proposed re -a lignment can be located no further to the north due to the proximity of the existing Gerald R. Ford amphitheater. The applicant is proposing a single retaining wall exceeding the prescribed 6 foot height limit to minimize the site disturbance and potentia l impacts to the Gore Creek riparian area associate d with constructing a series of tiered walls less than 6 feet in height. Due to the legally non -conforming conditions of the existing retaining wall , the proximity of the existing amphitheater, and the re commendations of the Ford Park Management Plan, Staff finds the proposed variance is necessary to attain the development objectives of the Zoning Regulations without a grant of special privilege. Staff therefore finds the propose variance is consistent wit h this review criteria.
Town of Vail Page 18 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. The proposed retaining wall height variance will faci litate the expansion and re -alignment of East Betty Ford Way to relocate automobile and delivery truck traffic to the east side of the park. The proposed improvements to East Betty Ford Way will reduce vehicular traffic along West Betty Ford Way and will reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts at the west entrances to the park, the playground area, the open field area, the AIPP public art display area, and the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. Staff believes this will positively impact transportation and traffic fac ilities and public safety. Staff does not believe the requested variance will have a significant negative a ffect on light and air , the distribution of population , or public facilities and utilities in comparison to the existing conditions. Therefore, Sta ff finds the propose variance is consistent with this review criteria. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. Pursuant to Section 14 -6 -7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code, “…retaining walls associate d with a street located within a public right -of -way or to an underground covered parking structure are exempt from these height limits…” The terms public way, p rivate s t reet , and public street are defined by Chapter 14 -2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, as follow s: PUBLIC WAY: Any public street, easement, right of way, highway, alley, way, place, road or bike path, and any nonexclusive utility easement. STREET, PRIVATE: Any street not dedicated to the public for purposes of vehicular or pedestrian use. STREET, PUBLIC: A. The entire width between the boundary lines of every way publicly maintained when any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular or pedestrian travel; B. The entire width of every way declared to be a public highwa y by any law of this state; and further classified and defined as follows: 1. Arterial Streets: Those which permit the relatively rapid and unimpeded movement of large volumes of traffic from one part of the community to another. 2. Collector Streets: Th ose which collect traffic from minor streets and carry it to arterial streets or to local traffic generators. Collector streets
Town of Vail Page 19 include the principal entrance streets to a residential development, those linking such adjacent developments, and those streets providing circulation within such developments. 3. Minor Streets: Those used primarily for direct access to properties abutting the right of way. Minor streets carry traffic having an origin or destination within the development and do not carry through traffic. Staff do es not find Betty Ford Way to meet the expli c it definitions above and d oes not i nterpret Betty Ford Way as “a street located within a public right -of -way ”. H owever, Staff believes Betty F o rd Way exhibits the characteristics of a street located with in a public right -of -way and believes the proposed retaining wall variance is in keeping with the intent and purpose of the retaining wall height exemption prescribed in Section 14 -6 -7, Ret aining Walls, Vail Town Code. VII I . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA Before acting on a conditional use permit application, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors with respect t o the proposed use: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town. Staff finds the proposed amendments to the Ford Park conditional use permit further the general purposes of the zoning regulations. S taff believes the e xisting park and the proposed improvements to Ford Park maintain the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its natural environme nt and its established character as a resort and residential community of high quality. Staff finds the proposed conditional use permit amendments further the specific purposes of the zoning regulations by continuing : • To provide for adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities. • To secure safety from fire, panic, flood, avalanche, accumulation of snow, an d other dangerous conditions. • To promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and to lessen congestion in the streets. • To promote adequate and appropriately located off street parking and loading facilities. • To conserve and maint ain established community qualities and economic values. • To encourage a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consistent with municipal development objectives. • To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land with structures. • To safeguard and enhance the appearance of the town.
Town of Vail Page 20 • To conserve and protect wildlife, streams, woods, hillsides, and other desirable natural features. • To assure adequate open space, recreation opportunities, and other amenities and facili ties conducive to desired living quarters. • To otherwise provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community. Staff f inds the proposed conditional use permit amendments further the purposes of the General Use District. St aff believes the existing park and the proposed improvements to Ford Park continue to provide sites for public and quasi -public uses which, because of their special characteristics, cannot be appropriately regulated by the development standards prescribed for other zoning district s, and for which development standards especially prescribed for each particular development proposal or project are necessary to achi eve the purposes prescribed in S ection 12 -1 -2 , P u rpose, of the Zoning Regulations , and to provide for the public welfare. Staff finds the existing park and the proposed conditional use permit amendments continue to ensure that public buildings and grounds and certain types of quasi -public uses permitted in the General Use District are appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail, are harmonized with surrounding uses, and, in the case of buildings and other structures, ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other a menities appropriate to the permitted types of uses. Staff finds the existing park and proposed conditional use permit amendments are consistent with the following Land Use Plan goals: Goal 1. General Growth/Development 1.1 Vail should continue to gro w in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.2 The quality of the environment including air, water and other natural resources should be protected as the Town grows. 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 1.13 Vail recognizes its stream tract as being a desirable land feature as well as its potential for public use. Goal 2. Skier /Tourist Concerns 2.1The community should emphasize its role as a destination resort while accommodating day visitors.
Town of Vail Page 21 2.4 The community should improve summer r ecreational options to improve year -round tourism. 2.5 The community should improve non -skier recreational options to improve year -round tourism. 2.7 The Town of Vail should improve the existing park and open space lands while continuing to purchase open space. Goal 6. Community Services 6.1 Services should keep pace with increased growth. 6.2 The Town of Vail should play a role in future development through balancing growth with services. 6.3 Services should be adjusted to keep pace with the needs o f peak periods. Staff finds the proposed amendments to the Ford Park conditional use permit are consistent with the goals, objectives, and policy statements of the adopted Ford Park Management Plan. The following is a summary of the proposed park improvements a nd the supporting Ford Park Management Plan goal s (including objectives, policy statements, and action steps): Landscape and Pedestrianization Improvements - see Goals #1, 3, 4 & 5 • Upgrading of walkways from Frontage Road t ransit/parking areas into Park • West Betty Ford Way - pa th widening, new path surface, seating and lighting • East Betty Ford Way - path widening, re -grading to lower slope of path, new path surface, seating and lig hting, overlooks to Gore Creek • Landscape improvements throughout Park • Creek bank restoration/enhan cement below (parking lot) Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater – see Goals #3 & 5 • Re -design of lawn seating area • New east restrooms and u pgrading of existing restrooms • Garden Overlook Terrace (within Amphitheater) to Alpine Gardens Athletic Fields – see Goals #2 , 3 &4 • Re -configured/expand athletic fields and associated retaining wall, seati ng, fencing, landscaping, etc. • New bathrooms and concession building at east end of fields • New west bathrooms and maintenance/storage building (for VRD and Alpine Garden) Betty Ford Alpine Garden – see Goal #5
Town of Vail Page 22 • North entry to Garden See Goals #4 and 5 Transit/Parking/Service – see Goal s #2 & 4 • Dedicated bus stop (and shelter) along Frontage Road (location of shelter is proposed at this time, architectural design of shelter to be provided for PEC review at lat er date) • Re -configured parking lot, new ac cess points with Frontage Road • Improved storm water d rainage system for parking lot Consistent with Goal #1 (Preserve and Protect Ford Park ) of the Ford Park Management Plan, the proposed conditional use permit amendment s do : • Limit future development to only new and existing uses allowed by the plan. • Maintain all existing park functions at a high quality level (generally in their current loc ations). Consistent with Goal #1 (Preserve and Protect Ford Park) of the Ford Park Management Plan, the proposed conditional use permit amendment s do not : • Allow any new or existing use that is prohibited by the management plan. • Allow any new or changed f acility to curtail another existing public use or facility at the park. • Allow lease agreements for any party that does not currently hold such an agreement (Vail Valley Foundation, Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, and Vail Recreation District). • Alter the histori c qualities and natural character of the Nature Center. Staff finds that the proposed conditional use permit amendments are consistent with the Illustrative Plan recommendations of the Ford Park Management Plan (see Attachment D). Therefore, Staff finds the proposed amendments to a conditional use permit are consistent with this review criterion. 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, an d other public facilities needs. The proposed conditional use permit amendments include improvements to the North Frontage Road, the Ford Park parking lot, the North Frontage Road bus stop, and Betty Ford Way which Staff finds to have a positive effect up on the transportation facilities of the park. The proposed amendments to the Ford Park conditional use permit facilitate the construction of various improvements to the park as identified in Section II of this
Town of Vail Page 23 memorandum. Staff finds these improvements t o the community’s parks and recreations facilitates in keeping with the outcome of the November 8, 2011, election which reallocated conference center funds to improvements projects at Ford Park. Staff finds the proposed amendments to the conditional use permi t do not significantly affect light and air, distribution of population, utilities, schools, and other public facilities need s in comparison to existing conditions. Therefore, Staff finds the proposed amendments to the conditional use permit are consisten t with this review criterion. 3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. As identified elsewhere in this memorandum, the proposed conditional use permit amendments include improvements to the North Frontage Road, the Ford Park parking lot, the North Frontage Road bus stop, and Betty Ford Way which Staff finds to have a positive e ffect upon congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. Therefore, Staff finds the proposed amendments to a conditional use permit a re consistent with this review criterion. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. The proposed conditional use permit amendmen ts include the proposed construction of the three new structures: • Storage/restrooms at the west end of the athletics fields . • Concessions/restrooms at the North Frontage Road park entrance between the athletic fields and the tennis courts . • Amphitheater restr ooms located at the east amphitheater entry gate . Staff finds the proposed location, scale and bulk of these structures is consistent with the Illustrative Plan recommendations of the adopted Ford Park Management Plan. These proposed structures are also s ubject to further review by the Town of Vail Design Review Board for conformance with the Town’s adopted design guidelines. Therefore, Staff finds the proposed amendments to a conditional use permit are consistent with this review criterion. 5 . Such othe r factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed use.
Town of Vail Page 24 I X . RECOMMENDATION VARIANCE The Community Development Department recommends approval , with a condition, of this request for a variance from Section 14 -6 -7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 14 -1 -5, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for deviations from the retaining wall height limits, located at 530, 540, and 580 South Frontage Road East (Ford Park)/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Staff’s recommendation is based upon the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to appro ve this variance request , the Community Development Dep artment recommends the Commission pass the following motion : “The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the applicant’s request for a variance from Section 14 -6 -7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 14 -1 -5, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for deviations from the retaining wall height limits, located at 530, 540, and 580 South Frontage Road East (Ford Park)/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto.” Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to appr ove this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission imposes the following conditions : “1. Approval of this variance is contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town of Vail approval of the associated design review appl ication s .” Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings : “Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section V II of the Staff memorandum s to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated May 21 , 2012 , and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. The granting of this variance will not constitute a granting of spec ial privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the General Use District. 2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improve ments in the vicinity. 3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons:
Town of Vail Page 25 a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the o bjectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that does not apply generally to other properties in the General Use District. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the General Use District.” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The Community Development Department recommends the Planning an Environmental Commission approves, with a condition, these amendments to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -16 -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of various improvements at Ford Park (reali gnment of athletic fields, new restroom and concession buildings, Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater renovations, park entrance improvements, streetscape improvements, etc.) located at 530, 540, an d 580 South Frontage Road East/Unplatted, and setting forth detail s in regard thereto. This recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section V I II of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this conditional use permit amendment request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission passes the following motion : “The Planning and Environmental Commission approves t he applicant’s request for amendments to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Sect ion 12 -16 -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of various improvements at Ford Park (realignment of athletic fields, new restroom and concession buildings, Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater renovations, park entrance improvemen ts, streetscape improvements, etc.) located at 530, 540, an d 580 South Frontage Road East/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto .” Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this conditional use permit amendment req uest, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission imposes the following condition : “1 . This conditional use permit approval is contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town of Vail approval of the associated design review application s .” Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this conditional use permit amendment request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings :
Town of Vail Page 26 “Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section V I II of the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated May 21 , 2012 , and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. The proposed conditional use permit is in accordance wi th the purposes of the Zoning Regulations and the General Use District. 2. The proposed conditional use permit and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained are not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in jurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The proposed conditional use permit complies with each of the applicable provisions of Chapter 12 -16, Conditional Use Permit, Vail Town Code.” IX. ATTACHMENTS A. V icinity Map B. Applicant’s Request C. Rev ised Development Plan D. Ford Park Management Plan Updated April 17, 2012
Opal Building ∙ 225 Main Street ∙ Suite G -002 ∙ Edwards, Colorado ∙ 81632 970 -926 -7575 ∙ 970 -926 -7576 fax ∙ www.braunassociates.com M E M O R A N D U M TO: Bill Gibson FROM: Tom Braun CC: Todd Oppenheimer, Kurt Freizen, Pedro Campos DATE: May 17, 2012 RE: Refinements to Plan Set The following summarizes the refinements that have been made to the Development Plan for Ford Park. Sheet LS103 : • A small boulder wall was added along EBFW near the tennis courts and minor refinements to site grading have been done in order to create a terrace -effect to provide space for additional landscape planting (see sheet LS202 below) • T he retaining w all elevation s have been nominally reduced as a result of the new cross -section of EBFW. Cross -section changes include the addition of a curb on the south side of the path (to protect the landscape strip along the railing) and a correspondin g reduction in the height of the retaining wall (see LS202 for wall detail). Sheet LS106: • The retaining w all elevation s have been nominally reduced as a result of the new cross -section of EBFW (see LS202 for wall detail). Sheets LS106.1 -106.3 • Refinements to Amphitheater lawn grading, elimination of continuous boulder walls, etc. Sheet LS202 • Detail 1 of the Pedestrian Railing changed from 30” to 42” (this increase corresponds with the elimination of 12” of retaining wall at the base of the railing) • Detail 2 Special Pavement Image was updated to reflect site changes (shuttle shelter relocated, bollards removed, planting beds along EBFW narrowed) Sheet LP103 • Additional landscaping at the upper end of EBFW to define/embellish the path. We will be present ing a variety of additional information in response to PEC comments regarding the application; however this information does not affect the proposed Development Plan. If interested, I would be happy to discuss the nature of this additional information wit h you.
Opal Building · 225 Main Street · Suite G-002 · Edwards, Colorado · 81632 970-926-7575 · 970-926-7576 fax · www.braunassociates.com FORD PARK IMPROVEMENT PLAN C.U.P. APPLICATION May 4, 2012 The purpose of this report is to provide a narr ative description of improvement plans proposed for Ford Park. This description includes how the proposal complies w ith applicable review criteria for the requested Conditional Use Permit a nd Variance applications and an assessment of the Development Plan and its conformance with zoning standards. Included in the narrative below is the following: • Public Initiative on Impr ovements to Ford Park • Ford Park Stakeholders • Ford Park Management Plan • Improvement/Development Program • Conditional Use Permit Proce ss and Review Criteria • Variance Request Review Criteria • Development Plan/Zoning Standard evaluation • Project Phasing Public Initiative on Improvements to Ford Park Improvements to Ford Park have been an ongoi ng topic of discussion si nce the old Antholtz Ranch was named the Gerald R. Ford Park in 1977 . A number of plans have been completed in order to define the parks future and over th e past three decades many significant improvements to the Park have been made. Today Ford Park provides the community with a focal point for recreational, educational, social and cultural activity. Along with Vail Mountain, Bridge Street, Lionshead and the Gore Range; Ford Park is one of the special and unique places in Vail that defines our community. The most recent impetus for improvements to Ford Park evolved from discussions of the Town’s Conference Center funding. This past fall 87% of Vail voters approved re-allocation of the $9-plus million Conference Center Funds. As endorse d by the voters, reallocation of these funds is to provide funding for a portion of the improve ments proposed for Ford Park, specifically improvements to the Ford Amphitheater as well as expansion of the fields and restroom improvements at the Ford Park athletic co mplex. By an overwhelming margin the Vail community has endorsed improvements to Ford Park.
Ford Park Stakeholders The Town of Vail is the land owne r of Ford Park and plays an active role in the management and operation of the Park. The Town also has lease or other agreements with three other entities that manage and maintain facilities in the Park: • The Vail Recreation District, • The Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, and • The Vail Valley Foundation. Collectively the Town and the Ford Park stakeh olders have been working collaboratively on the preparation of improvement plans for the Park. To varying degrees each of the stakeholders are collaborating with the Town by participating in the design and fundi ng of their respective improvement plans. Ford Park Management Plan The Ford Park Master Plan was adopted in 1985 and in 1997 this plan was amended with the adoption of the Ford Park Management Plan. Th e Management Plan “sets forth six management goals with accompanying objectives, action steps, and policy statements to provide a framework for future management decisions”. Conceptual site plans and written descriptions of these potential park improvements are al so included in this Plan. This past Spring the Management Plan was updated to reflect new ideas for improvements planned for the Park. The 2012 update continues th e overall direction for the Park established by the 1997 Management Plan and in doing so main tains the role the Park has played in the community for the past 30 years. The update made no changes to the six goal statements or to the related objectives, policy statements and action steps outlined in the 1997 Plan, nor were any significant changes to the activities that currentl y take place in the Park proposed. The new ideas for improvements in the Park are expressed via the Ford Park Illustrative Plan, a generalized site plan and accompanying narrative description of future improvements that could occur in the Park. This plan is found on the following page. Concepts depicted on the Illustrative Plan are considered to be appropriate improvements and activities for the Park. However, all improveme nts are subject to further review by the Town (Conditional Use Permit, Development Plan review , DRB review) prior to being implemented. In some cases the description of improveme nts provided below include parameters or considerations that should be addressed during detailed design and as a part of subsequent review by the Town. Improvements proposed by this Development Plan have evolved from the concepts depicted on th e Illustrative Plan. 2012 Ford Park Improvement Plans 2 CUP/Variance/Development Plan
2012 Ford Park Improvement Plans 3 CUP/Variance/Development Plan
Improvement/Development Program The following summarizes improvements included with the proposed Development Plan: Landscape and Pedestrianization Improvements • Upgrading of walkways from Frontage Road transit/parking areas into Park • West Betty Ford Way - path widening, new path surface, seating and lighting • East Betty Ford Way - path widening, re-grading to lower slope of path, new path surface, seating and lighting, overlooks to Gore Creek • Landscape improvements throughout Park • Creek bank restoration/enhancement below (parking lot) Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater • Re-design of lawn seating area • New east restrooms and upgrad ing of existing restrooms • Garden Overlook Terrace (within Amphitheater) to Alpine Gardens Athletic Fields • Re-configured/expand athletic fi elds and associated retain ing wall, seating, fencing, landscaping, etc. • New bathrooms and concession buil ding at east end of fields • New west bathrooms and maintenance/storag e building (for VRD and Alpine Garden) Betty Ford Alpine Garden • North entry to Garden Transit/Parking/Service • Dedicated bus stop (and shelter) along Frontage Road (location of shelter is proposed at this time, architectural design of shelter to be provided for PEC review at later date) • Re-configured parking lot, new access points with Frontage Road • Improved storm water drainage system for parking lot • Centralized trash facility (loca tion of facility is proposed at this time, architectural design of shelter to be provided fo r PEC review at later date) • New sewer line on west end of Park and new water line from Tennis Center to Amphitheater along East Betty Ford • Improved loading/delivery to the Amphitheate r by designing East Betty Ford Way such that this corridor can accommodate trucks/deliveries 2012 Ford Park Improvement Plans 4 CUP/Variance/Development Plan
Conditional Use Permit Review Process Ford Park is zoned General Use (GU). In the GU District “Public and private parks and active outdoor recreation areas, facilities and uses” are a Conditional Use. As such, virtually any improvement proposed in the Park requires revi ew of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The CUP process requires submittal of a Developmen t Plan. The Development Plan includes detailed building plans, engineer ing plans and landscape plans. This plan is then evaluated relative to applicable CUP review criteria. The following criteria are to be used by the PEC in reviewing the CUP and proposed Development Plan: 1. Describe the precise nature of the proposed use and measures proposed to make the use compatible with other pr operties in the vicinity. Response There are no new uses proposed for the Park. Improvements proposed replace or enhance uses and activities that currently existi ng at the Park – athle tic fields, restrooms, the Amphitheater, paths and trails, parking and transit, service func tions. Given the size of the Park and the location of properties in the vicinity, no compatibility issues are anticipated from the proposed Park improvements. That said, one improvement worth noting relative to compatibility with othe r properties is the ne w bathroom/storage building at the west end of the Park. This building has been designed to be a very low-profile structure benched into the terrain a nd will include a green roof in order to minimize any impacts to neighboring residential uses. 2. The relationship and impact of the us e on development objec tives of the Town. Response Improvements proposed to the Park are in di rect response to the Town’s development objectives of enhancing the economic vitality of the community. A si gnificant portion of the project funding is from the re-allocati on of conference cente r funding. Vail voters overwhelmingly approved the use of conf erence center funding to improvement Ford Park. These improvements are intended to in crease the utilization of the park (i.e. expanded fields will allow the VRD to attrac t a wider range of us ers and groups creating economic development opportunities) and e nhance the overall ch aracter and guest experience of the Park (i.e. pedestrian e nhancements, improvements to loading/delivery and refinements to the Amphitheater). 2012 Ford Park Improvement Plans 5 CUP/Variance/Development Plan
Improvement plans for the Park are also c onsistent with the im provements generally depicted on the Illustrative Site Plan found in the Ford Park Management Plan and improvement plans are also supported by the goals, objectives and po licy statements of the Management Plan. Foremost among these are Goal #2 – Reduce vehicular intrusions in, and their impact on the Park and Goal #3 – Improve internal pe destrian circulation within Ford and the pedestri an connections between Ford Park and Vail Village. Improvements to pedestrian flow are planne d between the bus stop/parking area and the lower bench of the Park. Betty Ford Way is the primary pedestrian corridor within the Park and improvements are also planned along th is entire corridor. A major objective of these improvements is to increase the width of this path to better accommodate pedestrians during peak periods of use, to re duce the slope of path s and to improve the quality of the Park by add lighting, sea ting and improved walking surfaces. The improvement plans are also intended to significantly reduce the impact of truck traffic (primarily deliver/serv ice vehicles to the Amphitheat er) through the lower bench. This will be accomplished by designing East Betty Ford Way to accommodate trucks such that the major of all delivery trucks can enter and exit the Park via East Betty Ford Way. Currently approximately 150 trucks each summer access the Amphitheater via Betty Ford Way from the west and this traffi c significantly diminishes the quality of the Park experience, specifically on the lower bench. Improvements planned for East Betty Ford Way will allow for all but 8-12 (large) truc k trips per year to enter and exit the Park via the east. 3. The effect of the use on light and air, dist ribution of population, tran sportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. Response The proposed project will have a direct effect on two of the considerations listed above – the project will result in significant improve ments to the Town’s park and recreation facilities and the development of a dedi cated bus stop will improve transportation operations to and from the Park. While Gore Creek technically does not fall within the considerations listed above, potential effects of proposed improvements on Gore Creek warrant discussion. Specifically, this relates to plans for improve ments to the parking lot and to East Betty Ford Way and associated retaining wall cons truction. A number of improvements and other measures are planned to minimize adverse effects of these projects on the Creek: 2012 Ford Park Improvement Plans 6 CUP/Variance/Development Plan
• Best Management Practices (BMP’s) will be established during the preparation of construction drawings. These improvement s will be designed specific to the steep slope of the creek bank and include among ot her things measures to prevent run-off and erosion into the Creek during construction. • A slope restoration plan is pr oposed for the existing creek ban k. This is in addition to the re-vegetation of areas disturbed by c onstruction. This program will improve the aesthetic appearance of the bank. • New stormwater management improvements are proposed for the parking lot. This plan will collect runoff from the lot and r un it though a filter system prior to discharge into the Creek. Currently runoff flows o ff the parking lot dir ectly to the Creek. 4. The effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking area. Response The expanded athletic fields arguably will allow for an increased level of activity at the Park, i.e. two lacrosse or soccer games on “fu ll-sized” fields would be able to take place at the same time. However, this level of activity is much less than that of other events such as the 3 on 3 soccer tournament. Further, two soccer games can occur simultaneously today on “junior level” fields so in that respect ha ving two “full-sized” fields would not significantly increase traffic or congestion in the Park from what can occur today. The development of a dedicated bus drop-off, se parate from the parking lot, will increase safety and convenience for both the bus riders and private vehicles. 5. The effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed us e is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. Response There are no new uses proposed for the Park and as such uses will have no effect on the character of the area or surrounding uses. A ll new buildings proposed for the Park are very low-scale and will be comp atible with surrounding uses. Variance Review Process A variance to the 6’ maximum retaining wall hei ght is proposed. While the majority of all retaining walls proposed for the project are within the 6’ maximum, there is a small section of 2012 Ford Park Improvement Plans 7 CUP/Variance/Development Plan
wall adjacent to the Amphitheater loading dock and to Gore Creek that exceeds the maximum allowable height. Refer to the attached sk etch for plans of existing and proposed wall conditions. Additional information on this variance is provided below. 2012 Ford Park Improvement Plans 8 CUP/Variance/Development Plan
2012 Ford Park Improvement Plans 9 CUP/Variance/Development Plan
Factors Enumerated: Before acting on a varian ce application, the planning and environmental commission shall consider the following factor s with respect to the requested variance: 1. Describe the precise nature of the proposed use and measures proposed to make the use compatible with other pr operties in the vicinity. Response A boulder retaining wall of approximately 12.5 ’ currently exists along East Betty Ford Way adjacent to the Amphithea ter loading dock and Gore Creek. The widening of East Betty Ford Way has created the need for a new wall in this area. An engineered wall is proposed. At its highest point this proposed wa ll is +/-14’6” tall. Site conditions are major factors in the height of this wall. Existing amphitheater improvements do not allow for the path to be moved to the north (which would allow for a lower wall). Limited space between the wall and Gore Creek preclude the possibili ty of terracing the wall. Limited space between the wall and Gore Creek also precludes the possibility of creating a fill slope below the wall. As a “fill wall” this retaining wall will not be as visible as a cut wall. Visually the wall will be buffered by existing vegetation. Th e wall will be faced with Colorado Buff Sandstone Veneer. 2. The relationship and impact of the use on development objectiv es of the Town. Response The wall is a direct function of providing a wider path. Widening the path accomplishes two purposes – to improve pedestrian flow to and from the Amphitheater and to provide a path of sufficient width to accommodate deliv ery vehicles and in doing so significantly reduce the number of trucks that currently im pact the Lower Bench of Ford Park. These improvements are directly consistent with goals for the Park as outlined in the Ford Park Management Plan. 3. The effect of the use on light and air, dist ribution of population, tran sportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. Response Other than the benefits to the Park as men tioned above, the variance has no direct effect on these other considerations. 2012 Ford Park Improvement Plans 10 CUP/Variance/Development Plan
4. The effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenien ce, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking area. Response The wall height variance will allow for widening East Betty Ford Way. This will improve both convenience and safety for park users. 5. The effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in re lation to surrounding uses. Response While exceeding the maximum 6’ wall height, the retaining that is proposed is not uncommon for mountain conditions and as such the proposed wall height should not have an effect of the characte r of the surrounding area. Development Plan/Zoning Standards Development standards within the GU District are to be determined by the PEC during the review of a proposed Development Plan. These standards include lot ar ea and site dimensions, setbacks, building height, density control, site coverage, landscaping and site development and parking and loading. Most of thes e standards are not rele vant given Ford Park’s large site area and the relatively modest level of development that is proposed. Further, the majority of proposed improvements involves landscaping and s ite work and as such does not affect these development standards. Development statistics for proposed buildings are: West Restroom Building 1,785 Gross SF 14’ 10” Building Height Bathroom/Concession Building 1,612 Gross SF 13’ 6” Building Height East Amphitheater Restrooms 981 Gross SF 11’ 6” Building Height 2012 Ford Park Improvement Plans 11 CUP/Variance/Development Plan
Below is a summary of parki ng standards for the project: Parking Ford Park currently has 199 parking spaces, on a typi cally a number that is more than sufficient to meet the parking needs of the Park. “Peak days” are another matter – the 4 th of July Lacrosse tournament, the “3 on 3” soccer tournament, Am phitheater events, etc. all draw a significant number of people to the Park. During these types of events th e on-site parking will be 100% utilized and alternative m eans of accessing the Park are utilized. Foremost among the alternatives used by Park users is to park in the Vail Village Parking Structure and walk to the Park. The Town also provides direct shuttle bus es from the Structure to the Park and also extends the “In-Town” route beyond Golden Peak to provide service to the Nature Center Bridge. These alternative means of access to the Park ar e in keeping with long term goals for parking management. For example: The 1973 Vail Plan discussed the Antholz Property (later to become Ford Park) and highlighted the property’s “ease of walking distance from the Village” and that “major parking will be accommodated in the transportation center”. The 1985 Master Plan for Ford Park depicted only 136 parking spaces, yet this plan included basicall y all park improvements that currently existing and a swimming pool complex. A policy statement from the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan states “new uses added to Ford Park in the fu ture shall be structured to encourage users or participants to walk or ride the bus rather th an drive.” Another policy states that “adequate parking for the needs of the park are to be provided in the park and at the Village Structure”. In summary, the premise for Ford Park has always b een that parking for peak events should be provided at the Village Structure and that alternative means of accessing the park be provided. The proposed Development Plan includes 203 park ing spaces, 188 of which are located within the parking lot and 15 are proposed along the Fron tage Road. Frontage Road spaces will require approval from the Colorado Department of Tran sportation. Dialogue w ith the State is ongoing and an initial decision on these spaces is expected in the coming months. Currently all 199 existing spaces are located w ithin the parking lot. The Town Council’s objective is that improvements to Ford Park resu lt in “no net loss” of parking. The proposed parking standard is for 203 spaces, with the condition that CDOT approve the 15 Frontage Road spaces. In the event CDOT does not approve the Frontage Road spaces the proposed parking standard for Ford Park would be 188 spaces. Th is lesser number of space s is considered an adequate number of spaces to meet the typical daily needs for the Park and that during peak events bus transportation and the Vail Villag e Parking Structure provi de sufficient parking alternatives. 2012 Ford Park Improvement Plans 12 CUP/Variance/Development Plan
Project Phasing Initial improvements planned for Ford Park in clude all improvements outlined above and as depicted on the Ford Park Phase I Development Pl an (that accompanies this application). There will however, be some phasing of these Phase I imp rovements as the project will be implemented over the next couple of years. Funding for thes e improvements is coming from three sources – the Town of Vail, the Vail Valley Foundation and the Vail Recreation District. Cost estimating of the Phase I Development Plan is currently underway and the results of this analysis will influence decisions regarding th e final phasing of the project. Detailed phasing, or better term ed “construction sequencing” will be provided at time of final review by the PEC. These plans will be made based on funding availability, construction efficiencies and the premise that all improvements to be initiated can “stand on their own” (i.e. are not dependent upon the completion of other improvements at a later date). 2012 Ford Park Improvement Plans 13 CUP/Variance/Development Plan
ED SMALL OUTDOOR SCONCE HUBARDTON FORGE FORD PARK Exterior Materials List Final DRB 4/23/12 Material Location Manufacturer Species/Color 2” Thinstone Veneer “Sports Central” West Restrooms Telluride Stone Company “Santa Fe Ledge” or “Highlands” Cementitious Stucco “Sports Central” West Restrooms Dryvit 457B “Whole Wheat” Wood Channel Rustic Siding “Sports Central” West Restrooms Stain: PPG/Porter Paints Species: Red Cedar or Beetle-Kill Pine, Color:“Clove Brown”Semi-Transparent Wood Trim “Sports Central” West Restrooms N/A Species: Red Cedar or Beetle-Kill Pine,Color: “Clove Brown”Semi-Transparent Man Doors “Sports Central” West Restrooms N/A Dark Brown Wood-Clad Overhead Doors West Restrooms Stain: PPG/Porter Paints Species: Red Cedar or Beetle-Kill Pine,Color: “Clove Brown”Semi-Transparent Coiling Doors “Sports Central” N/A Dark Brown Windows“Sports Central” West Restrooms Eagle Windows Metal-Clad, “Coffee Bean” Standing Seam Metal Roof “Sports Central” Berridge “Medium Bronze” EPDM/ Concrete Tile Roof “Sports Central” Carlisle Roofing Tiles integrally-colored by Davis Colors: “San Diego Buff” Baked Metal Fascia “Sports Central” West Restrooms Berridge “Medium Bronze” “Living” (Vegetated) Roof West Restrooms Tray System N/A -BANDED Outdoor aluminum sconce with glass options and top plates, small. Available in additional sizes; see Specification Book for details.Dimensions Height 12.5"Width 6"Projection 4.7"Backplate 12.5" x 5.3"Mounting Height 6.3"Max Hanging Weight 3 lbs Incandescent Lamping Socket: medium Bulb: BT-15, 100 watt max Fluorescent Lamping (30-5992F)Socket: fluorescent: GU24 Bulb (Included): GU24 fluorescent, 13 watt Glass 66 - Tube 2.99" OD x 9.96"Glass Color Options G - Opal H - Stone ZW - Soft Amber ZX - Pearl UL / CUL Listing Suitable for wet locations FL
ED SMALL OUTDOOR SCONCE HUBARDTON FORGE FORD PARK Exterior Materials List Final DRB 4/23/12 Material Location Manufacturer Species/Color 2” Thinstone Veneer “Sports Central” West Restrooms Telluride Stone Company “Santa Fe Ledge” or “Highlands” Cementitious Stucco “Sports Central” West Restrooms Dryvit 457B “Whole Wheat” Wood Channel Rustic Siding “Sports Central” West Restrooms Stain: PPG/Porter Paints Species: Red Cedar or Beetle-Kill Pine, Color:“Clove Brown”Semi-Transparent Wood Trim “Sports Central” West Restrooms N/A Species: Red Cedar or Beetle-Kill Pine,Color: “Clove Brown”Semi-Transparent Man Doors “Sports Central” West Restrooms N/A Dark Brown Wood-Clad Overhead Doors West Restrooms Stain: PPG/Porter Paints Species: Red Cedar or Beetle-Kill Pine,Color: “Clove Brown”Semi-Transparent Coiling Doors “Sports Central” N/A Dark Brown Windows“Sports Central” West Restrooms Eagle Windows Metal-Clad, “Coffee Bean” Standing Seam Metal Roof “Sports Central” Berridge “Medium Bronze” EPDM/ Concrete Tile Roof “Sports Central” Carlisle Roofing Tiles integrally-colored by Davis Colors: “San Diego Buff” Baked Metal Fascia “Sports Central” West Restrooms Berridge “Medium Bronze” “Living” (Vegetated) Roof West Restrooms Tray System N/A -BANDED Outdoor aluminum sconce with glass options and top plates, small. Available in additional sizes; see Specification Book for details.Dimensions Height 12.5"Width 6"Projection 4.7"Backplate 12.5" x 5.3"Mounting Height 6.3"Max Hanging Weight 3 lbs Incandescent Lamping Socket: medium Bulb: BT-15, 100 watt max Fluorescent Lamping (30-5992F)Socket: fluorescent: GU24 Bulb (Included): GU24 fluorescent, 13 watt Glass 66 - Tube 2.99" OD x 9.96"Glass Color Options G - Opal H - Stone ZW - Soft Amber ZX - Pearl UL / CUL Listing Suitable for wet locations FL
NEW COPPER CLADDING STUCCO TO MATCH EXISTING NEW STONE VENEER TO MATCH PROPOSED LANDSCAPE STONE NEW METAL FENCE PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING METAL FEATURES NEW ZAHNER ‘DIRTY PENNY’ COPPER FACED EGRESS NEW VEGETATED ROOF TRAY SYSTEM VIEW LOOKING AT EXISTING EAST GATE TOWARDS GORE RANGE VIEW LOOKING AT EXISTING EAST GATE TOWARDS STAGE VIEW LOOKING AT EXISTING EAST GATE UP TRAIL NEW STONE VENEER TO MATCH EXISTING STUCCO SIDING PAINTED METAL TO MATCH EXISTING
NEW COPPER CLADDING STUCCO TO MATCH EXISTING NEW STONE VENEER TO MATCH PROPOSED LANDSCAPE STONE NEW METAL FENCE PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING METAL FEATURES NEW ZAHNER ‘DIRTY PENNY’ COPPER FACED EGRESS NEW VEGETATED ROOF TRAY SYSTEM VIEW LOOKING AT EXISTING EAST GATE TOWARDS GORE RANGE VIEW LOOKING AT EXISTING EAST GATE TOWARDS STAGE VIEW LOOKING AT EXISTING EAST GATE UP TRAIL NEW STONE VENEER TO MATCH EXISTING STUCCO SIDING PAINTED METAL TO MATCH EXISTING
1 Resolution No. 17 , Series of 20 12 RESOLUTION NO. 1 7 Series of 2012 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FORD PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN , AND SETTING FORTH DETAIL S IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, the Ford Park Management Plan was last updated on April 14, 1997 ; and, WHEREAS, on November 8, 2011, the Town of Vail electorate approved ballot question #1 which stated: “Without increasing taxes, shall the Town of Vail use the remainder of the one and one -half percent lodging tax revenues and one -half percent sales tax revenues collected from January 1, 2003 throu gh December 31, 2005 to fund the following projects that will promote recreation, promote tourism and support the economy in the Town of Vail: Expansion and improvement of the clubhouse at the Vail Golf Course and Nordic Center, including multi -use commu nity space; Field expansion and restroom renovation at the Ford Park Sports Complex; and Ford Amphitheater improvements, including outdoor seating and restroom improvements?” ; WHEREAS, the allocation of funding for projects at Ford Park by the Novemb er 8, 2011 , election necessita tes updates to the Ford Park Management Plan; WHEREAS, the purpose of the amendments to the Ford Park Management Plan is t o facilitate the construction of projects funded by the November 8, 2011 , election; WHEREAS, the amend ments to the Ford Park Management Plan do not alter the objective s or policy statements of the plan as adopted on April 14, 1997 ; WHEREAS, the amendments to the Ford Park Management Plan are proposed by the Town of Vail in collaboration with the Vail Recr eation District, Vail Valley Foundation, and Betty Ford Alpine Gard ens ; WHEREAS, on March 5, March 26, and April 9, 2012, the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission held public hearing s on an application to amend the Ford Park Management Pla n ;
2 Resolution No. 17 , Series of 20 12 WHEREAS, on April 9, 201 2 , the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval for the proposed Ford Park Management Plan amendments to the Vail Town Council ; WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds and determine s that the amendment s are consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the developm ent objectives of the town; WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds and determines that the amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan further s the general and specific purposes of the plan; and, WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds and determines that the amendment s promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. NOW TH E REFORE, BE IT R ESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: S ECTION 1. The Ford Park Management Plan is hereby amended as depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto (text to be deleted is in strikethrough , text that is to be added is in red ). INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail held this 17 th day of April , 201 2 . __________________ Andrew P. Daly, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Lorelei Donaldson, Tow n Clerk
AN UPDATE TO THE FINAL REPORT FORD PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN An Amendment to the Ford Park Master Plan April 14, 1997 Updated April, 2012 New text added to the Plan is in “red ” Text deleted is in “strikeout ”
AN UPDATE TO THE FINAL REPORT FORD PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN An Amendment to the Ford Park Master Plan Prepare for: Town of Vail Public Works Department Community Development Department Administration Department Prepared by: Braun Associates, Inc. AECOM Zehren Associates, Inc. Updated April, 2012
Ford Park Management Plan Update 1 April 2012 Introduction The Ford Park Management Plan herein pr esented is to serve as an amendment to the 1985 Master Plan for Gerald R. Fo rd Park. The Ford Park Management Plan contains eight sections. Sections 1 - 4 introduce the plan: An executive summary, a history and time line of Ford Park, a description of the management plan process, and a statement of purpose of the management plan. Section 5 is the heart of the management plan: a set of six management goals with accompanying objectives, action steps, and policy statements to provide a framework for future management decisions . Section 6 contains illustrative, conceptual plans and written descriptions which support the various action steps. A 5-Year Capital Improvement s Program for Ford Park is presented in Section 7. In 2012 the Ford Park Management Plan was updated to reflect new ideas for improvements planned for the Park. Plans to make improvements to the Park were initiated when Vail voters approved funding by re-allocating a portion of Convention Center Funds to Ford Park. The other stakeholders in the Park are also participating in the fundi ng of these improvements. The 2012 update continues the overall dire ction for the Park established by the 1997 Management Plan and in doing so main tains the role the Park has played in the community for the past 30 years. The 2012 update makes no significant changes to the activities that currently take place in the Park. By way of example, all of the major uses in the Park – athletic fields, passive recreation, the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater , the Alpine Gardens and tennis remain in place. There are no changes to the six major goal statements or to the related objectives, policy statem ents and action steps outlined in the 1997 Plan. Refinements to the Plan resulting from the 2012 update ar e limited to the Illustrative Plan Component of the 1997 M anagement Plan. The Illustrative Plan Components are conceptual site plan di agrams of improvements suggested for the Park. Many of the park improvements identified by the 2012 Update will implement improvements firs t identified in the 1997 Plan. These improvements and new improvements not previously contemplated by the 1997 Plan are outlined in Section 6.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 2 April 2012 Section 1: Executive Summary The property which is today Gerald R. Ford Park was acquired by the town in 1973 in response to public reaction against a high density residential development proposal. The 39 acre park si te represented the last remaining parcel of land central to use by all re sidents and visitors of the Vail Community. The Vail Plan (1973) described the site as a major community park – cultural center that would satisfy the town’s growing recreat ional and cultural needs. Development of the lower por tion of the park was directed by the Gerald R. Ford/ Donovan Park Master Plan (1985). St rong public participation led to the establishment of guidelines for the im plementation of future improvements. Upper area improvements, softball fields, tennis courts, and parking areas, were constructed without the benef it of preplanning and subsequently created some barriers to the lower bench, natur al areas, and Nature Center. The Vail Village Master Plan (1990) recommended the park be considered as a site for additional skier parking to serve expansion on the eastern side of Vail Mountain. It also recommended the cons truction of bike/pedestrian ways along the South Frontage Road and Va il Valley Drive. There are currently four main organiza tions involved in the operation of Ford Park. The Town of Vail, Vail Recreati on District, Alpine Garden Foundation, and the Vail Valley Foundation all play dist inct roles and manage separate portions of the park. The Town of Vail is the ow ner of the park and manages the community park, stream tract, and parking lot areas. The other three organizations each hold a lease or license agreement to operate their respective facilities and programs within the park. A proposal by the Alpine Garden Foundatio n to construct an educational center within the garden area was a significant im petus to the creation of this document. However, several other formal and in formal development expansion proposals and numerous unresolved park management iss ues also existed. The Ford Park Management Plan was created as a means to evaluate development proposals in order to protect and enhance t he character of the park. The 1997 Plan was a direct product of strong public participation in focus groups and public input sessions. One clear, concise message was conveyed to the town staff from the public participants: Our role is steward to the park; don’t screw it up by over development. To that end, this Plan, serving as an amendment to the 1985 Ford Park Mast er Plan, was intended to guide the outcome of future development a nd improvement proposals through the implementation of six major goals: 1. Preservation and protection 2. Reduction of vehicular intrusions
Ford Park Management Plan Update 3 April 2012 3. Reduction of conflicts between venues 4. Resolution of parking and Frontage Road access problems 5. Improvement of pe destrian circulation 6. Delineation of financial responsibilities Designed to be a framework for future management decisions, a series of objectives, action steps and policy statements facilitat e the implementation of each goal statement. The most recent motivation for initiating improvements to Ford Park evolved from discussions of how to utilize the Town’s Conference Center f unding. In the Fall of 2011 Vail voters approved the re-allocati on of the $9-plus million Conference Center Funds by an 87 percent margin. As endorsed by the voters, a portion of these funds was to provide funding for im provements to Ford Park, specifically improvements to the Ford Amphit heater, the Alpine Gardens, park-wide pedestrian flow, as well as expansion of the athletic fields and restroom improvements at the Ford Pa rk athletic complex. As a part of the 2012 Update process the 1997 Management Plan was one of the considerations used to define improvem ents both necessary and appropriate for the Park. Improvements contemplated for the Park are consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and action steps of the 1997 Plan. However, some improvements were new ideas and nece ssitated some clarification to the Illustrative Site Plan concepts depicted in the 1997 Plan. In response to this the 2012 Update to the Ford Park Management Plan was prepared. Ford Park Stakeholders The Town of Vail is the land owner of Fo rd Park and plays an active role in the management and operation of the Park. T he Town also has lease or other agreements with three other entities that manage and main tain facilities in the Park: • The Vail Recreation District, • The Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, and • The Vail Valley Foundation. Collectively the Town and the Ford Park stakeholders have been working collaboratively on the preparat ion of improvement plans for the Park and to varying degrees each of the stakeholders are collaborating with the Town by participating in the funding of their respective improvements
Ford Park Management Plan Update 4 April 2012 Section 2: Background of Ford Park History Gerald R. Ford Park has been the subject of numerous legislative and community planning actions over the last 24 years. The time line at the end of this section illustrates the relationship between the actions discussed in this section. The Ford Park site was acquired by the Town of Vail in April of 1973 for the stated purpose of improving t he quality of life in the community. This 39 acre park site represented the last remaining parcel of land central to use by all residents and visitors of the Vail community. The ex isting conditions plan, which follows this section, illustrates Ford Pa rk in its current condition. Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1973, signed April 3, 1973, (a copy of which is included in the Appendix), authorized the purchase (b y condemnation) of the property known as the Antholz Ranch. T he ordinance listed a variety of possible uses for the property including the following: • for park and greenbelt purposes, • to preserve the natural and physi cal character of the area to be condemned, • for bicycle, equestrian and hiking trails, • for children’s playground, • for performing arts and civic center, • for a ski lift and related facilities, • for picnic areas, • for recreational facilities such as tennis courts, swimming pools, gymnasium, ice skating rink, • for theater and assembly halls, convention center, public schools, • for possible exchange or trade of condemned land, or a portion thereof, with other property which may exactl y meet the needs of the town, and • to construct and maintain water wor ks, transportation systems, and other public utilities relating to public health, safety, and welfare. In August of 1973, the Vail Plan was co mpleted. This plan was designed to control the growth and development of the community and contained a chapter on the town recreation system. The Ant holz Ranch property was mentioned as the only site satisfying the recreation use anticipated. In the Vail Plan the uses intended for the property were further defined. The uses listed include a place for showing and creating art, cr afts, etc.; an indoor theater as well as an 800 seat outdoor amphitheater; meet ing rooms and community workshops; wide outdoor terraces and natural landscapes; indoor ice arena, tennis and handball courts; children’s play facilities and space for family activities; headquarters for the Annual Vail Symposium and local televi sion; and a possible location for an ecologium (nature center). The property was described as a major community
Ford Park Management Plan Update 5 April 2012 park-cultural center. The plan called fo r 200 surface parking spaces and direct service from the town bus system . Major parking needs were to be accommodated in the Vail Transportation C enter with various trails and bikeways connecting to the park. In January of 1977, Resolution No. 1, Series of 1977, was passed naming the property commonly known as the Antholz Ranch as Gerald R. Ford Park in appreciation of President Ford’s contri butions to the community. Resolution No. 1, Series of 1977 is included in the Appendix. In August of 1985 the Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park Master Plan Development Final Report was complet ed. The Ford Park Master Plan was adopted by Council with Resolution No. 19, Series of 1985, which is included in the Appendix. The purpose of the master plan was to guide the future development of these parks and establish guidelines fo r the implementation of improvements. The master planning project used a Re creation Needs Analysis Survey and involvement of the public in determining the recreation priorities of the community and the design concepts and cr iteria for the two park sites. The Ford Park master plan proposed a s wimming pool complex, neighborhood park improvements, a skating rink on the lowe r bench, and the realignment of the eastern softball field. The neighbo rhood park open space area, playground, and access road were the only portions of the master plan actually constructed. The first major structure to be construc ted in the park, t he Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater, was completed in July of 1987. The Parking and Transit Study completed in April of 1979 for the Am phitheater made five recommendations: The Village Structure should be considered the major parking facility for Ford Park, with improvements to the si gns, sidewalks, and bus service being necessary; extend shuttle bus service to the soccer field; disallow Frontage Road parking; construct a vehicle turn-ar ound and passenger unloading area at Ford Park; and do not schedule concurrent events. Resolution No. 27, Series of 1987, was passed on November 3, 1987. Resolution 27 designated the seven acres around the Nature Center as an area to be preserved as an example of the Gore Valle y’s natural history. Vehicular traffic was restricted and certain policies and procedures for preservation and maintenance of the grounds and facilities we re established with the resolution. A copy of resolution No. 27, Series of 1987, is included in the Appendix. Development of the community park por tion on the lower bench of Ford Park included the restroom, play ground area, open turf area and picnic facilities, and the west access road. Thes e improvements were completed in November of 1988. In December of 1988, the Vail Metropolit an Recreation District (Now the Vail Recreation District) and the Town of Vail, requested an amendment to the 1985
Ford Park Management Plan Update 6 April 2012 Ford Park Master Plan. The two phas e amendment was adopted by Council as Resolution No. 44, Series of 1988. P hase one of the amendment was to utilize the on-site tennis courts and allow the construction of four additional courts. Phase two of the amendment changed t he proposed location of the Aquatic Facility to the eastern softball field. F unding of the Aquatic Facility was rejected by voters in a special election on February 6, 1989. Vail Town Council was presented with a petition to delete all re ference to an aquatics center from the Ford Park Master Plan in April of 1990. No record of Council action on the petition was found. While t he tennis center building is not mentioned in the Master plan amendment, the VRD did rece ive a Conditional Use Permit for the project on May 8, 1990. In 2008 a new lease between the Town of Vail and the Vail Recreation District was created and included all Town owned facilities managed by the Vail Recreation District. The lease requires a 20 year Capital Maintenance Plan, reviewed annually, to detail the financia l responsibilities of each party. The Vail Village Master Plan, adopted January 16, 1990, addresses Ford Park as a specific study area. This study acknow ledges the use of the park in recent years to accommodate overflow skier and local parking needs. It recommends the park be studied further as a site for additional skier parking to serve expansion of the eastern side of Vail Mountain. Action Step #5 under Goal #5 states “study the feasib ility of an undergroun d (recreation fields would remain) parking structure in Ford Park”. The Parking and Circulation Plan, within the Vail Village Master Plan, identifies the we stern portion of the upper bench for a potential parking beneath park, and calls for separ ated bike/pedestrian ways along the South Frontage Road a nd Vail Valley Drive. The Vail Transportation Master Plan, co mpleted in 1993, states, the existing Ford Park Parking area (east end of par k) should be considered for a possible 2-level parking facility with the second leve l below existing grade. Ford Park and the athletic field parking area are also listed as two possible sites for oversized vehicles if the lot east of the Lionshead Structure becomes developed. The 2009 Vail Transportation Master Pl an Update replaced the 1993 Plan and mentions Ford Park as a possible area fo r increasing the Town’s parking supply, and that “potentially, 300-600 net new parking spaces could be provided at Ford Park” and suggests a roundabout be constr ucted east of the Vail Valley Drive intersection with the South Frontage Road to allow east bound traffic to be diverted back to the west. Currently this action occurs at the Ford Park bus stop area. Current Park Management There are currently four main organizati ons operating in Gerald R. Ford Park. The Town of Vail, Vail Recreation Dis trict, Alpine Garden Foundation, and the
Ford Park Management Plan Update 7 April 2012 Vail Valley Foundation all play distinct roles and manage separate portions of the park. The Town of Vail is the owner of the entire Gerald R. Ford Park site and manages the community park, stream tr act, and parking lot areas. The other three organizations each hold a lease or license agreement to operate their respective facilities and programs within the park. The Vail Recreation District Lease of December 21, 1993, describes the premises license as incl uding the upper bench of Ford Park, public tennis courts, athletic fields and Nature Center, al though the graphic repr esentation of the premises was not attached to the lease agreement. The VRD offers a variety of sports leagues, camps, and tournaments to area residents and guests. The Vail Nature Center occupies the seven ac res between Vail Valley Drive and Gore Creek and offers environmental educat ion and research opportunities to residents and guests. The Vail Valley Foundation , (VVF), a non-profit, c haritable organization, manages and maintains the Ford Am phitheater and immediate grounds. The terms of the agreement bet ween the Town and the VVF, signed December 8, 1987, and renewed in 1999; includes an endowment for ongoing repair and maintenance of the Amphitheater. The amphitheater seats up to 2,500 people and hosts approximately 60 events dur ing the summer. Hot Summer Nights concerts, Bravo! Colorado, and the Bolsho i Ballet are some of the more popular programs held at t he amphitheater. The Vail Alpine Garden Foundation , a Colorado non-profit corporation, manages the Betty Ford Alpine Garden under a Limi ted License Agreement signed June 8, 1994. The original Alpine Display Ga rden was constructed in 1987 under a license agreement with the Town at the entrance to the amphitheater. The site for the Alpine Garden was established in the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan to act as a buffer between the amphitheater and active park areas. The second phase of the garden, the Perennial Garden, and third phase, the Meditation Garden, were constructed in 1989 and 1991 respectively. The Alpine Rock Garden was constructed in 1998 and the Children’s Garden was constructed in 2002. A proposal by the Alpine Garden Foundation to construct an Educational Center with the final phase of the garden was contro versial. Opposition to the expanded use of the garden and the in terior of park was a signi ficant impetus to the creation of the 1997 Management Plan. In response to that opposition, the Vail Alpine Garden Foundation m odified the proposal to locate the Educational Center near the athletic field parking lo t on Vail Valley Drive. This location received conceptual approval by the Council on October 15, 1996, however the project was not im plemented. The lower bench of Ford Park is managed by the Town of Vail Department of Public Works and Transportation and serves as a community park and open space facility with picnic, playground and open play areas. The lower bench is utilized several times a year for specia l events where large tents are often
Ford Park Management Plan Update 8 April 2012 erected to accommodate the activities. A ccess to the park from the Golden Peak ski base is by a public access easement through the Manor Vail property. A copy of the easement is included in the A ppendix. The Town operates the upper bench parking lot as a public parking facilit y during the ski season. Access to the upper bench parking areas is from the State owned South Frontage Road. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) is the agency responsible for reviewing and approving access permit applications from the State-owned Frontage Road. Currently, no access permi t has been issued for the access by the CDOT. CDOT Frontage Road right-of-way covers a substantial portion of the paved parking lot. Time Line of Ford Park Activities April 1973 Condemnation of An tholz Ranch. Ordinance 6, 1973 August 1973 Completion of Vail Plan. January 1977 Antholtz Ranch named Gerald R. Ford Park. Resolution 1, 1977 August 1985 Completion of Ford/Do novan Park Masterplan. Resolution 19,1985 July 1987 Amphitheater construction complete August 1987 Alpine Demons tration Garden complete. November 1987 Preservation of Nature Center. Resolution 27, 1987 December 1987 Vail Valley Foundation lease signed. November 1988 Lower Bench improvements complete. December 1988 Masterplan amendment by VRD. Resolution 44, 1988 December 1988 Service agreement with VRD. Resolution 46, 1988 May 1989 Tennis Center receives Conditional Use Permit. July 1989 Alpine Perennial Garden complete. January 1990 Completion of Vail Village Masterplan. February 1990 Aquatic Cent er rejected by voters in special election.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 9 April 2012 April 1990 Council petitioned to delet e Aquatic Center from Masterplan. May 1990 Tennis Center construction complete. June 1991 Alpine Meditation Garden complete. April 1993 Completion of Va il Transportation Master Plan. December 1993 Vail Recreation District agreement renewed. June 1994 Vail Alpine Garden Foundat ion license agreement signed. June 1995 Town begins Ford Park Management Plan. October 1996 Council allows Vail Alpine Garden Foundation to proceed through process with Educationa l Center at Soccer Field parking lot (not implemented). April 1997 Ford Park Management Plan adopted. 1999 Lease with Vail Valley Foundation renewed. 2008 Lease with Vail Recrea tion District renewed. 2009 Vail Transportation Plan Update completed. November 2011 Voters approve use of Conference Center Funding for Ford Park Improvements
Ford Park Management Plan Update 10 April 2012 Section 3: Process of Developing the Management Plan The Ford Park Management Plan proce ss was initiated in June of 1995 in response to several development proposals which had been formally and informally discussed and as a means to solve existing park management issues. The development proposals included an Educ ational Center for the Betty Ford Alpine Garden, cultural/performing arts ce nter, expansion of the tennis facility, athletic field fencing, and a communi ty parking structure. Park management issues included parking shortage, fr ontage road access, pedestrian access and circulation, access for the elderly and di sabled, utilization of the lower bench, conflicts between uses within the park, conflicts with adjacent property owners, and delineation of financial responsibilitie s. At the time the project was authorized Council expressed concern that a new master plan for Ford Park would result in an excessive amount of new development. In response, staff noted the intention of the project was to create a ma nagement plan as a means to adequately and consistently evaluate development proposals, thus limiting development and protecting the character of the park. Those organizations with a financia l and managerial role along, with two neighborhood representatives, were i dentified as the Stakeholder Group and were invited to participate in the process. A third party facilita tor was retained for the project in August of 1995. Staff me mbers from the To wn, Vail Recreation District and Alpine Garden participated in the facilitator selection process. Staff felt that a third-party facilitator would be beneficial to the pr oject by offering a non-biased opinion and increasing Stak eholder participation. The Stakeholder Group was assembled in a series of meet ings over the eight month period from August 1995 to April 1996. The meetings drew out issues, ideas, expansion proposals, and began formulating possible solutions. Alternative design solutions addressi ng parking options, vehicular access, Frontage Road improvements, additiona l sports facilities and management policies, were presented to the public in an open house at the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater on June 12, 1996. Citizens were asked to complete a self-guided presentation and opinion survey form. The open house presentation was a turning point in the process of developing the Management Plan. Several residents we re alarmed by the alternatives included in the presentati on and initiated a grass-root s movement to place a referendum on any future expansion/devel opment within the park. This strong public reaction, combined with a lack of closure with the St akeholders Group, prompted the Town to revise the proce ss to include more public involvement at that time. Previously, public input was being reserved for a time when alternative plans could be presented for comment. Three Focus Group meetings with selected individuals from the community were held on September 18, 1996. Stakeholder groups were invited to submit a list of questions for inclusion in the Focus Group discussions. In round table di scussion, individuals were asked to
Ford Park Management Plan Update 11 April 2012 respond to a list of prepared questions regarding uses and issues associated with Ford Park. The Focus Group questions and responses are included in the Appendix. Additional public input sessions were hel d on October 2 and 3, 1996, which validated the focus group res ponses and further refined staff’s understanding of the public perception and desires regarding Ford Park. The combined results of the focus gr oup and public input sessions along with a preliminary master plan framework were presented to the Planning and Environmental Commission on October 14, 1996, and Town Council on October 15, 1996. Both PEC and Council directed st aff to proceed with drafting the plan as an amendment to the 1985 Ford Pa rk Master Plan based on the input received and presented. Plans to make improvements to the Park were initiated in 2011 when Vail voters approved funding by re-allocating a portion of Convention Center Funds to Ford Park. During the election schematic plans were presented that involved improvements to the athletic fields , the amphitheater, the alpine gardens, pedestrian circulation, trans it and other areas of t he park. Following voter approval of funding the main stakeholde rs in the Park began to refine improvement plans. Meetings were hel d with adjacent neighbors, a community open house was held and numerous public meet ings were held by the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Town Council.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 12 April 2012 Section 4: Purpose of the Management Plan This document is formatted as an amendm ent to the 1985 Master plan (revised) for Ford Park. While so me of the physical aspec ts of the park have changed since the adoption of the 1985 Master plan, the essential character, concept, and function of the park have remained cons istent. The 1985 Master Plan, enhanced by this amendment, remains a valid docum ent to be used in the future planning and decision-making process for Ford Park . As with all master plans, this document will have a definite life for which it remains a useful decision-making tool. The life expectancy of this plan is approximately 10 year s but should remain in effect until replaced by an updated master plan document. The Ford Park Management Plan will take precedence over the 1985 Master Plan where conflicts or discrepancies occur. The intention of the combined document s is to guide the outcome of future development proposals within Ford Park by modifying the permitted uses (1973 acquisition legislation), recommending development guidelines, limiting the number of leaseholders within Ford Park, and designating buffer/protection zones within and adjacent to the park. The 1985 Master Plan acknowledges some s hortcomings in the overall design of the park, particularly the layout of the upper bench area and the internal pedestrian circulation system. This amendm ent will formulate design alternatives to these specific problem areas to co rrect the deficiencies that exist. This amendment will also delineate manager ial, operational, and financial responsibilities between t he Town and the leaseholders. As outlined above, the 2012 update to t he 1997 Management Plan furthers the overall direction for the Park estab lished by the 1997 Plan and in doing so maintains the role the Park has played in the community for the past 30 years. Specifically, the 2012 Update suggests fe w significant changes to the overall level of development and activities that ta ke place in the Park. In addition, many of the improvements identifi ed in the 2012 Update were orig inally proposed in the 1997 Plan. Most importantly all improvem ents proposed in Section 6: Illustrative Plan Components are in keeping with the goals, objectives and policies of the Management Plan.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 13 April 2012 Section 5: Goals, Objectives, Policies and Action Steps Goals for Ford Park are summarized in six major goal stat ements. Each goal statement focuses on a particular aspec t of Ford Park brought up during the stakeholder and public input portions of the Management Plan process. As one might anticipate, there is a certain amount of overlap between the goal statements. The issues concerning Ford Park are complicated and convoluted as are the solutions to these issues. It is intended that t he goal statements be consistent and complementary to eac h other and be designed to provide a framework, or direction, for the future management of Ford Park. A series of objectives following each goal statement outline specific steps that can be taken toward achieving each stated goal. Policy statements are intended to guide decision-making in achieving each of the stated objectives in reviewing development proposals and implementing c apital improvement projects. Action steps are the final measure in im plementing the goal statements. Illustrative plans following the Goals, Objective, and Action Steps are included to help explain the concepts represented by t hose statements. The illustrations are conceptual and are not to be consi dered as final design solutions. Goal #1: Preserve and protect Ford Park. Objective 1.1: Limit future development . Action Step 1.1.1 : Draft a new ordinance to exclude those uses listed in Ordinance No.6, Series of 1973, now considered to be inappropriate, and to redefine the allowable uses within Ford Park. Policy Statement 1: The following uses that are allowed and prohibited for Ford Park shall take precedence over Se ction 18.36.030 of the Municipal Code concerning the General Use Zone District. Allowed Uses Park and greenbelt Bicycle and hiking trails Children’s playground Outdoor amphitheater Botanical gardens Environmental, educational, and historical centers Picnic areas Recreation and athletic facilities Transportation systems and other public utility easements Parking Administrative offices
Ford Park Management Plan Update 14 April 2012 Prohibited uses Ski lift and related facilities Exchange or trade Civic center, convention/conference c enter, public schools, gymnasium, and assembly hall Swimming pools Equestrian trails Type III and IV employee housing Policy Statement 2: New or changed facilities or uses will not be permitted to curtail existing public uses of facilities in the Park unless there is either a compelling public interest or adequate alter native facilities are available to its users. All functions in t he park shall be maintained and function at a high quality level. Action Step 1.1.2 : Create and attach plan sh eets which outline lease areas, referred to as Exhibit A in the Vail Recreation District lease agreement and Exhibit B in the Vail Valley Foundation l ease agreement, but which were never attached. Policy Statement 3: The existing variety of uses and facilities in the Park will be preserved. The Town will not enter into a lease agree ment with any party that does not currently hold such an agr eement, hereby maintaining current leaseholder status to: Vail Valley F oundation, Vail Alpine Garden Foundation, and Vail Recreation Distri ct, or their successors. Objective 1.2: Refine criteria for evaluati ng future development proposals. Action Step 1.2.1 : Update the Design Criteria and Site Guidelines included in the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan by: a) Creating additional development gui delines for underground, low visual impact type structures, enhanced landscaping, and full and complete impact mitigation. b) Enforcing existing criteria and guide lines to solve and/or avoid problems associated with development pr ojects within Ford Park. Objective 1.3: Designate Preservation Zones within Ford Park to protect sensitive natural areas and/or buffe r zones between venues areas from developmental impacts. Define allowed uses within Preservation Zone areas. Action Step 1.3.1: Define criteria for designating Preservation Zones and their uses within Ford Park. For exam ple, significant native vegetation, wildlife habitat, and wetlands may be cr iteria for designating sensitive
Ford Park Management Plan Update 15 April 2012 natural areas, while grade separat ions and dense landscape plantings may be criteria for designating sensitive buffer zones. Action Step 1.3.2: Delineate Pres ervation Zones within Ford Park. Policy Statement 4: All proposed development projects shall be reviewed for compliance with Design Criteria and Site Guidelines, as well as other Town regulations, and shall be additionally j udged according to the recreational, educational or social benefit t hey bring to the community. Policy Statement 5: Functions that do not maintain high standards of quality or that diminish the experience of park users, will not be permitted. Policy Statement 6: The historic qualities and natur al character of the Nature Center are to be maintained. Objective 1.4: Enhance use and preservation of the Historic School House. Action Step 1.4.1: Negotiate a c ontract with the Vail Alpine Garden Foundation to open the School House for public visitation and to perform preservation activities of photographs and artifacts. Action Step 1.4.2: Make physical im provements to the school house to enhance lighting, public access and viewing areas. Goal #2: Reduce vehicular intrus ions in, and their impact on, the park. Objective 2.1 : Reduce the demand for vehicular intrusions into the park. Action Step 2.1.1: Provide additiona l on-site storage facilities within the Amphitheater, Alpine Garden and Recreatio n District areas to reduce and control the frequency of delivery and serv ice vehicle intrusions into the park. Action Step 2.1.2: Improve traffic gat e operations and restrictions on both the east and west access roads to eliminate unnecessary and unauthorized vehicular intrus ions into the park. Action Step 2.1.3: Construct a centra l trash collection facility, accessible from the South Frontage R oad, to be used by all leaseholders within the park for the disposal of trash, landscape debris, and recyclables. Policy Statement 7: Vehicular encroachment into the park will be minimized. The only vehicular uses allowed in the park are for: maintenance; delivery of
Ford Park Management Plan Update 16 April 2012 goods and materials too large or heavy to be carried by non-motorized means; access for people with disabilities limit ed mobility; public transportation; and emergency services. Objective 2.2: Reduce the conflicts betw een vehicles and park users. Action Step 2.2.1: Coordinate deliv ery schedules to reduce the frequency of delivery and service vehicle intrus ions into the park during peak use time periods. Action Step 2.2.2: Improve loading do ck facilities in the Amphitheater to expedite the unloading and setup fo r performances and to reduce the need for large vehicle parking outsi de of the Amphi theater area. Action Step 2.2.3: Improv e the configuration of the east access road to allow use by large delivery vehicles, thus reducing the ov erall number of trips on the west access road and the need for the backing and turning of large vehicles on the lower bench of the park. Goal #3: Reduce conflicts between all Ford Park venues. Objective 3.1: Coordinate events on all Ford Park venues. Action Step 3.1.1: Expand the master schedule kept by the Town Clerk to include all venues within the park. Action Step 3.1.2: Hold preseason and monthly event/activity coordination meetings. Action Step 3.1.3: Hold semiannual (2x per year) coordination and input meetings with the Town Administra tors, leaseholder representatives, and neighborhood and adjacent property owner representatives. Policy Statement 8: Overlapping or simultaneous events that exceed the available community parking or other park infrastructure shall be discouraged. Policy Statement 9: No one event or type of use wil l be allowed to dominate the usage of the Park. Policy Statement 10: The Park is a Town of Vail community facility and in the case of conflicting uses, functions that best serve the interests of the community will have the highest priority. In all cases, final decisions regarding the Park rest with the Vail Town Manager.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 17 April 2012 Policy Statement 11: The day-to-day management and c oordination of activities in the Park will be assigned to the Park Superintendent. The Park Superintendent will coordinate as necessary with a representative of: The Town of Vail The Vail Valley Foundation The Alpine Garden The Vail Recreation District Objective 3.2: Improve buffers between differ ent use areas within the park. Action Step 3.2.1: Enhance the buffe r zone between the softball fields and the amphitheater and gardens by reversi ng the orientation of the center and east softball fields . Action Step 3.2.2: Enhance existi ng and new buffer zone areas through the addition of landscape planting. Goal #4: Resolve parking a nd South Frontage Road access problems. Objective 4.1: Develop and implement a parki ng management plan for Ford Park. Action Step 4.1.1: Locate a vari able message sign between the main roundabout and entrance to Village Stru cture for the purpose of informing drivers that close-in parking at Ford Park is restricted, at a fee, or full, and parking in the VTC is free and shuttle bus service is available. Action Step 4.1.2: Schedule shuttle bus service from top deck of the Village Structure to Ford Park Front age Road stop for special event/high demand days. Extend in-town shuttle bus service to Ford Park Vail Valley Drive stop. Action Step 4.1.3: De signate drop-off parking fr om Frontage Road using 15 spaces north of bus stop. Enforc e 5 minute time limit. Drop-off lane functions as a turn around once lot is filled. Schedule attendants on-site to manage drop-off spaces and assist users in loading and unloading. Action Step 4.1.4: Allocate clos e-in parking on Frontage Road and Vail Valley Drive through reserve ticket purchases or on a fee basis. Parking attendants on-site to manage entrances and exits. Establish a ticket surcharge or parking fee price schedul e which will generate sufficient funds to cover attendant and shuttle bus service costs. Fee parking is to be in effect for high-parking demand days only.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 18 April 2012 Action Step 4.1.5: Construct Fr ontage Road sidewalk from the Village Structure and improve sign system as necessary to accommodate pedestrian traffic to Ford Park. Policy Statement 12: Adequate parking for the needs of the park are to be provided in the park and at the Village Structure. Objective 4.2: Improve vehicular access from the South Frontage Road and improve parking lot design to maximize the number of parking spaces, aesthetics, and safety while mi tigating environmental impacts. Action Step 4.2.1: Design and cons truct improvements to the South Frontage Road to meet CDOT requirement s for obtaining a state highway access permit. Action Step 4.2.2: Design and constr uct improvements to all existing parking areas that maximize the number of parking spaces; provide landscape buffering and treatment of storm water run-off. Goal #5: Improve internal pedestrian circulation within Ford Park and the pedestrian connections between Ford Park and Vail Village. Objective 5.1: Improve directional and informat ional signs to and within Ford Park. Action Step 5.1.1: Develop a comprehens ive sign plan to direct Ford Park visitors from central sites in the Va il Village and from ea ch level of the Village Parking Structure to destinations within Ford Park. Objective 5.2: Improve pedestrian routes to Ford Park. Action Step 5.2.1: Design improvements to existing pedestrian routes that will correct grading, surf acing, and lighting and wil l provide resting and sitting areas. Objective 5.3: Improve internal pedestrian ci rculation within Ford Park. Action Step 5.3.1: Design a cent ral pedestrian path to enhance the connection between the upper and lowe r bench areas of the park. Policy Statement 14: Any uses added to Ford Park in the future shall be structured to encourage users or participants to walk or ride the bus rather than drive.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 19 April 2012 Policy Statement 15: Pedestrian access to the Park from the Vail Village should be easy and visible. The Park shall be as pedestrian-friendly as possible. Goal #6: Delineate financial responsibilities among Ford Park leaseholders and the Town of Vail. Objective 6.1: Formalize existing division of facility m anagement/operation costs. Action Step 6.1.1: Research current lease, license and use agreements for delineation of financial responsibilities. Action Step 6.1.2: Correct inequities in utility billing procedures and distribution systems, cu rrent utility use, and pay ment relationships. Policy Statement 16: All Ford Park leaseholders and the Town of Vail shall be required to share in common operating cost s that benefit the whole park facility and as outlined in current lease or license agreements. These in clude but are not limited to, electrical charges for pedestr ian path and parking lot lighting, trash removal charges, and regular parking lot and pedestrian path maintenance costs. . Objective 6.2: Create a cost-sharing agreement for Capital Improvement costs. Action Step 6.2.1: Create a five y ear capital improvements program for Ford Park. Action Step 6.2.2: Establish the be nefit/cost relationship for capital projects to determine appropria te cost sharing agreements. Policy Statement 17: Ford Park leaseholders and the Town of Vail desiring to make capital improvements within their re spective lease areas shall be required to provide funding for those improvem ents and for subsequent modifications to those areas outside of the lease ar ea caused by those improvements. Policy Statement 18: Services, functions, and programs provided by Ford Park leaseholders, by bringing visitors to the community, generate sales tax revenues which contribute General Fund funding s ources. Residents of the community which participate in those programs, cont ribute to the Real Estate Transfer Tax funding source through real estate transac tions. Both of these funding sources can be utilized by the Town of Vail to pay for capita l projects and improvements within Ford Park, reducing the need for contributions from the leaseholders.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 20 April 2012 Section 6: Illustrative Plan Components Section 6: Illustrative Plan Components. This section contains the maps and drawings necessary to illustrate the physical aspects and relationships of the plan. There are 7 plan sheets at a scale of 1" = 50'. The Index sheet orients each plan sheet to the overall park layout. A 24” x 36”' plan sheet at 1"=100' is included in the back of this document. The following text for each of the 7 plan sheets offers a written description of the improvements illustrate d. These drawings and descriptions are intended to illustrate the concepts of the improvements only and are not considered to be final construction documents. Sheet 1: Streamwalk and West Access Road Improvements. Streamwalk. Regrade eastern 370' of path to reduce existing slope of 15% to a maximum of 4.5%. Construct approximately 320' of 8' maximum height retaining wall. Replace existing vandal -prone path lights with a more vandal -resistant fixture. Install benches at 150' intervals to provide sitting and resting places. West Access Road. Reduce width of road entrance from South Frontage Road from the existing 50' to 10' to reduce visual significance of this entrance. Install an automated traffic control gate. Control gate to be hand -held opener operated on the Frontage Road side and automatic loop operated on the park side. The gate is to function as an exit only gate in conjunction with the East Access Road. Install additional landscape plantings and directional and park entrance signs. Install benches a t 150' intervals to provide sitting and resting places. South Frontage Road Walk Path. Construct 12' concrete pedestrian/bike path along south edge of roadway from Vail Valley Drive to the West Access Road entrance. Path will be separated from the roadway by 6" curb and gutter. Construct left -hand turn lane and right -hand turn traffic island at South Frontage Road and Vail Valley Drive intersection. Install additional path lights as necessary. Sheet 2: Ballfield and Circulation Route Improvements. Pedes trian Path. Extend pedestrian/bike path beyond West Access Road as 10' detached pathway. Widen path between softball infields and extend beyond the Tennis Center to the proposed main park entrance. Install 300 feet of highway guardrail along South Frontage Road to protect bleachers and spectators adjacent to softball fields. Install additional path lights as necessary. Softball Field and Path: Remove existing paved parking area and move eastern softball field approximately 30' north. Construct an 8' paved pedestrian path around the east and south sides of the eastern softball field to connect to the existing concrete path from the playground area. Install additional path lights and benches as necessary. Install directional signs at all path intersections. Install additional landscape plantings east and south of ballfield as a landscape buffer.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 21 April 2012 Sheet 3: Bus Stop / Main Entrance Improvements. South Frontage Road Improvements: Widen South Frontage Road to provide 6' bi ke lanes on each side, two 12' through l anes, 12' east bound right -hand turn lane, and 16' west -bound left -hand turn lane. Construct curb and gutter on both sides of the roadway. Construct raised, landscape median islands where possible to reduce the quantity of paved surface and to delineate tr avel lanes. (See typical cross section of median island). The turning and travel lanes indicated are in accordance with Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) highway access code requirements . Obtain Highway access permit form Colorado Department of Transportation. Bus Stop/Drop -off. Construct dedicated bus stop lane, accessed by an enter only drive cut from the South Frontage Road. This drive will also provide access to 15 dedicated drop -off parking spaces directly across from the Tennis Center entr ance. Install additional landscape plantings to buffer and screen parking areas from the roadways. Main Park Entrance. Construct Main Park Entrance drive with one entrance and two exit lanes. Install main park entrance sign and landscape plantings at this location. Install directional signs at all pedestrian paths and intersections. Install pedestrian and roadway lights as required. Tennis Court Relocation. Remove eastern court from existing bank of 4 courts. Construct new court on the western end of the existing bank of 2 courts. Excavation of the existing berm and relocation of water meter pits will be required. Sheet 4: Parking Area improvements. Parking Lot. Construct 7 disabled accessible parking spaces along east side of Tennis Complex. Expand are a of existing gravel parking area by cons tructing two sets of tiered 4' retaining walls. Revegetate hillside with native w ildflowers and shrubs. Construct 194 space paved parking lot with curb and gutter and landscape islands. Install storm water filtratio n system to clean water before discharge into Gore Creek. A total number of 209 parking spaces are indicated on this plan, an increase of 10 spaces. Install landscape plantings along Frontage Road and south edge of parking lot to screen and buffer parking area from adjacent roadways and neighborhoods. Install parking lot lighting as needed. Central Trash Enclosure. A central trash enclosure is shown at the southwest corner of the parking lot. This is intended to be a fully enclosed building which contains a trash dumpster or compactor unit. All leaseholders will utilize the central enclosure to dispose of trash generated at each facility. No trash truck traffic will be allowed into the park. Sheet 5: Manor Vail Entrance Improvements.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 22 April 2012 Manor Vail Walkway. R epair existing brick and concrete walkway as needed. Install Ford Park Entrance signs at intersection for walkway and Vail Valley Drive and at right -hand turn to the Manor Vail Bridge. The second entrance sign should be located where it is clearly visible from the walkway. Manor Vail Bridge. Increase the deck height of the Manor Vail covered bridge by approximately 4'. This is accomplished by removing the bridge from its footings intact, pouring an additional 4' of wall on the existing concrete footings, a nd resetting the bridge. Any structural improvements can be made to the bridge at that time. The 4' increase in elevation will allow the walks approaching the bridge form both directions to be reconstructed at lower grades. Replace existing pedestrian ligh ts with vandalproof fixtures. Install benches at approximately 150' intervals to provide sitting and resting places. Sheet 6: East Access Road Improvements. Access Gate. This entrance is intended to function as the primary service vehicle entrance to the Lower Bench. Install Automated traffic control gate at Intersection with parking lot. Gate will be hand -held opener operated on the parking lot side and roadway loop operated on the park side. This will be an enter and exit access point. Reconstruct exis ting access road to a 15' width at a maximum of 7.9% slope. Construct approximately 160' of 8' maximum height retaining wall along uphill side of the road. Install benches at approximately 100' intervals to provide sitting and resting places. Install addi tional path lights and directional signs as needed. Amphitheater loading Dock. Construct an additional 12' x 35' loading bay on the south side of the amphitheater to accommodate performance deliveries. The addi tional loading bay will reduce vehicle traffi c during peak park use times and reduce the need for parking outside the managed amphitheater area. Sheet 7: South Entrance Improvements. Soccer Field Parking. Improve the Soccer Field parking lot driveway entrance and restripe the existing lot to maximi ze the number of parking spaces. The Soccer Field lot is noted as the future site of the Alpine Garden Foundation=s Education Center pending development review process approval. This section contains site plan diagrams that illustrate conceptual plans for the Park . The Ford Park Illustrative Plan prov ided herein replaces site plans from the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan. This new plan reflects many of the same improvements contemplated by the 1997 Plan, but also includes a few improvements not previously contemplated. Concepts depi cted on the Illustrative Plan are considered to be appropriate impr ovements and activities for the Park. However, all improvements are subjec t to further review by the Town (Conditional Use Permit, Development Pl an review, DRB review) prior to being
Ford Park Management Plan Update 23 April 2012 implemented. In some cases the descr iption of improvem ents provided below include parameters or cons iderations that should be addressed during detailed design and as a part of subsequent review by the Town. Brief descriptions of improvements depicted on the Illustrative Plan for Ford Park, and when appropriate enlargements of such improvements, ar e provided below. It should also be understood that the site plan depicting thes e improvements is done at a very general, conceptual level. This plan is intended to illustrate concepts only and improvements depicted on this Plan will be refined as designs progress. As such final designs may vary from what is depicted on this generalized plan. Prior to the implementation of any im provements in Ford Park additional design details will be provided for review by the Town as a part of the Planning Commission’s review of a Devel opment Plan (as part of a Conditional Use Process) and/ or as a part of the Design Review Board review process. The Illustrative Plan provides a co mprehensive depiction of improvements contemplated for Ford Park. This does not mean however , that only those improvements depicted on this plan may be made. Improvem ents not depicted on the Illustrative Plan may be proposed provided they are consistent with the overall goals for the Park and with applicable objective s, policy statements and action steps outlined in the Management Pl an. It should also be understood that the improvements being depicted on the Illustrative Pl an does not ensure if or when they will be implemented. In many respects the Illustrative Plan is a vision for how the Park may be developed and not a commitment to any specific improvement.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 24 April 2012 Implemented Improvements from 1997 Illustrative Plan A number of improvements proposed by the 1997 Plan have been implemented. These improvements are listed below: 1. Reduce width of road entrance fr om South Frontage Road; install an automated traffic control gate. 2. Construct 12' concrete pedestrian/bike path along south edge of roadway from Vail Valley Drive to the West Access Road entrance. 3. Extend pedestrian/bike path bey ond West Access Road as 10' detached pathway. Widen path between softball infields and extend beyond the Tennis Center to the proposed main park entrance. 4. A central trash enclosure is shown at the southwest corner of the parking lot. 5. Increase the deck height of t he Manor Vail covered bridge by approximately 4'. 6. Widen South Frontage Road to provide 6' bike lanes on each side. 2012 Ford Park Illustrative Plan The Ford Park Illustrative Plan is found on the following page. Subsequent pages provide descriptions of specif ic improvements identified on each enlargement sheet of the Illustrative Plan. These improvements are presented by “topical” category (i.e. pedestrianizati on), location (i.e. the lower bench area) or major user (i.e. the Amphitheater or the athletic fields). Refer to the Illustrative Plan when reviewing thes e descriptions for a graphic depiction of the improvem ent and the surrounding context. When appropriate an enlarged section of the Illustrative Plan is provided in the context of narrative descriptions.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 25 April 2012
Ford Park Management Plan Update 26 April 2012 Preservation Zone One of the objectives of the 1997 Plan was to: Designate Preservation Zones within Ford Park to protect sensitive natural areas and/or buffer z ones between venues areas from developmental impacts. Define a llowed uses within Preservation Zone areas. A Preservation Zone is identified on the Ford Park Illustrative Plan. This zone primarily includes the Gore Creek Corri dor and the 7 acre Na ture Center area located south of Gore Creek. The location of the Preservation Zone was determined based on natural features and existing improvemen ts, the 100-year floodplain and the 50-foot waterbody setback. Within the preservation zone it is in tended that existing us es, improvements and buildings can be maintained and that no new uses, improvements or buildings inconsistent with the pres ervation of these areas is to occur. Low-impact improvements such as soft surface walki ng paths, fishing access, etc. along with utility improvements, drainage improvements, creek cr ossings, creek restoration projects and similar activities may be in itiated within the Preservation Zone. Fisherman access to Gore Creek, while curr ently not an issue (i.e. excessive use resulting in riparian area degradation), could become an issue in the future. A creek access point was considered at t he east end of the Nature Center (using the bus turnaround on Vail Valley Drive as an unloading area) but was rejected as contradictory to the intended use of the Nature Center. A defined creek access point is now being considered above Ford Park in the vicinity of the Pulis Bridge. Some improvements to the Park are c ontemplated adjacent to the Preservation Zone, notably the potential widening of Betty Ford Way. If the widening of this road is pursued, great care and attent ion to design and construction will be necessary in order to protect Gore Cr eek. Best management practices (BMP’s) will be essential in contro lling runoff, erosion, debris, etc. that could otherwise harm the creek. Pedestrianization/Park Arrival Ford Park has two distinct areas – t he upper bench which has an athletic focus and the lower bench which has more of an ar ts and cultural focus. Access to the Park is provided by one of six portals , each with their own unique purpose and characteristics. These portals are identif ied on the Ford Park Illustrative Plan.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 27 April 2012 Improvements are contemplated for a num ber of these portals, many of which originate outside the actual boundar y of the Park. One improvement contemplated for each portal is to in troduce a distinctive monument or identification feature to i dentify access to Ford Park. For example, the Gore Creek Trail provides access for people who park in the Village Parking Structure. An identification feature wher e the trail begins east of Vail Valley Drive could help people find their way to the Park. These features would signal the beginning of one’s “entry” to Ford Park with “arriva l” coming when one reaches the Park. While the design of individual identific ation features may vary, a common design character for all features should be used in order to create continuity and consistency in how the Park is identified. • Manor Vail Entry at Vail Valley Driv e – A pedestrian easement is in place that provides pedestrian access from Vail Valley Drive to the Covered Bridge. An identificati on feature should be considered at this location, the design of which would need to be c oordinated with Manor Vail. • Gore Creek Streamwalk – This tranqu il trail provides park access for many who park at the Village Parking Structur e. An identification feature should be installed at Vail Valley Drive. Efforts should be made to lessen the grade of this trail behind the Wr en Condominiums. This could be accomplished by re-grading the trail and installing retaining walls along the existing trail that could bring the grade down from +/-15% to +/-9%. Another alternative could be to re-ali gn the trail immediately adjacent to the Park in a manner that would c ontour across the hillside and eliminate the trail from “going up to only come down”. Due to steep terrain and proximity to Gore Creek, this solu tion would require sensitive design and construction so as to minimize impac ts on the creek. An alternative to a retaining wall solution could be to cant ilever a portion of the trail over the steeper hillside sections. • Frontage Road Sidewalk – This sidewal k provides direct access to the Park from the Village Parking Structure. An identificatio n feature should be considered at the intersection of the Frontage Road and Vail Valley Drive. • VV Drive/Soccer Field - During performances and special events buses are added to the town’s system and t heir route is extended to the turnaround at the east end of the Soccer Field in order to serve this portal (topography and roadway width prev ent the development of a bus turnaround closer to this portal). An identification feature should be considered at the intersection of t he Frontage Road and Va il Valley Drive. • Frontage Road/Transit Stop – A new trans it stop will provide access to an improved pedestrian corridor that leads into the Park and to the lower bench. An identification feature, along with identif ication of access to the
Ford Park Management Plan Update 28 April 2012 tennis center should be considered where this corridor begins. An accessible route consistent with t he Americans with Disabilities Act Guidelines should be identif ied from the transit stop to facilities throughout the park. • Frontage Road/Parking Area – East Betty Ford Way is the primary access to the lower bench from the parking area. An identification feature, along with identification of access to the tennis center should be considered where this corridor begins. Other pedes trian improvements to this corridor are described below. An accessible r oute consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act Guidelines should be identified from the transit stop to facilities throughout the park. Shuttle During events at the Amphitheater, golf cart shuttles are utilized for moving people to and from the venue. The idea of creating a similar system to provide shuttle service to general park users throughout the summer months is under consideration. The purpose of this shuttl e is two-fold - one is to provide the shuttles as a guest service and the other to provide alternative access into the Park for elderly or disabled guests. With regard to the later, the shuttle system could allow for the removal of accessibl e parking spaces at the Amphitheater and in doing so reduce car trips into the Park. Until such time as a shuttle system is implemented the accessible parking spaces at the Amphitheater should remain. Frontage Road Entry/Parking/Transit Existing transit and parking facilities al ong the Frontage Road are ill-defined and in many respects do not function well. For example, vehicle access points to parking areas are unclear and buses are not adequately segregated from private vehicles. While it is likely that more people enter the Park via pedestrian routes from the west and south, many guests do access the Park from this area via buses from the Frontage Road transit st op and from parking areas. A number of improvements are planned in order to im prove both the appearance and function of this area.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 29 April 2012 Frontage Road Entry/Parking/Transit Parking Facilities Existing parking areas should be redesi gned in order to achieve the Town Council’s goal of “no net loss” of parki ng. Currently there are approximately 200 parking spaces in the Frontage Road area, of which 17 are disabled parking spaces. An equivalent number of spac es are reflected on the Ford Park Illustrative Plan. Major changes to parking include the elim ination of approximately 50 existing spaces in order to accommodate the ex pansion to athletic fields and a new transit drop-off area. New spaces c an be created with the re-design of the eastern portion of the lot and by loca ting parking where the bus drop-off is currently located. The addition of “low impact” parking spaces along the South Frontage Road is also under c onsideration. This improvement will necessitate a sidewalk along the south side of the road and coor dination with CDOT will be necessary in order to implement this improvement. Access points to parking areas should be c onsolidated into two locations and may include turn lane improvements on the Frontage Road (subject to CDOT review). Short term drop-off parking spaces will be es tablished, the location of which will be determined during detailed de sign. Efforts should be made to locate short-term drop-off at the western end of the parking lots. The re-design of the parking area as depicted on the Illustrative Plan will still allow for use of this area for special ev ents and concerts. Determination of how
Ford Park Management Plan Update 30 April 2012 this area is used will be made by the Town Council and the Commission on Special Events. Bus Stop/Drop-off A dedicated bus stop lane separate from pr ivate vehicles will be provided. This facility is planned just west of the re-designed parking area. This location may allow for a bus shelter to be inco rporated into or adjacent to the Concessions/Restroom building. Pedestrian Improvements-Transit Stop Currently the relationship of the transit stop and the adjacent tennis center area is not well defined nor does this area have a clear image or relationship to other facilities within the Park. For exampl e, the arrangement and relationship of existing improvements is not clear and pedes trian routes to the Alpine Garden, the Amphitheater or lower bench recreation facilities are not intuitive. Landscape, signage and pedestrian improvements thro ughout this area will be implemented to improve existing conditions. Pedestrian Improvements-East Betty Ford Way East Betty Ford Way is a major pedestrian route from parking facilities to the Amphitheater. While this corridor provi des excellent views to Gore Creek and the Gore Range, the trial itself is in need of improvement. Porti ons of the trail are very steep and present challenges for some park users. The trail is also very narrow, particularly during periods of peak usage. This problem is compounded during Amphitheater events when golf ca rt shuttles share the trail with pedestrians. This trail should be wide ned and efforts made to lessen the grade of the trail. Widening of t he trail (12’ to 13’ maximu m) will alleviate golf cart - pedestrian conflicts, enable a shuttle system to be implemented at a future date, and allow increased use by delivery vehicles thus reducing delivery vehicle – pedestrian conflicts to the west. Pedestrian overlooks to Gore Creek along this route should be considered, both for aesthetic purposes and to provide pedestrians a safe location to stand at ti mes shuttles (or trucks) may be using this route. Athletic Fields Concessions/Restroom Building A new concessions/restroom building is contemplated at the east end of the athletic fields. The building may also include a small satellite office for the Recreation District (for us e during events and tournaments). This facility, along with the existing tennis center will “anchor” this area of the Park. Athletic Fields The size and shape of existing athletic fields is inefficient. The following improvements are planned to provide more usable fields:
Ford Park Management Plan Update 31 April 2012 Field Expansion Removal of the existing restroom/c oncession building and the westernmost surface parking lot will allow for increas ed field area that will accommodate three full-sized softball fields or two full-sized soccer/lacrosse fields. This is a major improvement to the Park in terms of the type of events that could be hosted. A retaining wall at the southwest corner of the fields will be necessary. It is anticipated that at the talle st point will be approximately 12’ and will taper back to existing grade at either end. Various wall systems and designs will be studied. This field improvement will also include new fencing around most of the fields and improvements to spectator areas. T he introduction of additional landscaping on the south side of the fields should be done to provide both shade and screening. West Field Restr oom/Storage Building A new restroom and park storage building is suggested at t he west end of the fields. The small storage component fo r the Recreation District and the Alpine Garden will minimize the number of vehicl e trips into the Park. This building replaces an existing storage buildi ng and will clean up existing unsecured maintenance and storage areas currently scattered throughout the park. Given the prominent location of this building at the west entry to the Park, it will be critical that users of th e storage facility keep all vehicles and stored material enclosed. Restrooms wil l serve users of the fields and pedestrians entering/exiting the Park from the west. The buildi ng should be low-profile and have a “grounded” appearance in the landscape. Athletic Fields/Concession Building
Ford Park Management Plan Update 32 April 2012 Lower Bench The following improvements ar e contemplated for the Lo wer Bench area of the park: Playground Restrooms Restrooms at the play ground are poorly sited , undersized and present an uncomfortable relationship to the rest of the Park. In th e near future these restrooms will be in need of renovation and at such time consideration should be given to re-locating them to a more discret e location. One alternative is to bench the restrooms into the hill below the athl etic fields. This location could allow these facilities to be accessible to users of the fields. If this solution is pursued consideration should be given to cr eating a stronger connection between the playground and the adjacent playfield. Ford Family Tribute The design intent and objective for the Fo rd Tribute is to announce the arrival to Ford Park in an iconic manner that cel ebrates the life and in fluence of the Ford family on our community. Envisioned as a unique landscape feature comprised of a combination of plants, stone, art and other natural materials, the Tribute will be located in the vicinity of the Manor Vail Bridge at the intersection with Betty Ford Way. The goal is to help solidify the Ford’s legacy for posterity, and to do so in a manner that is contextual to the natural environment, the Betty Ford Alpine Garden, the Gerald R. Ford Amphi theater, and the overall context of Ford Park. The Tribute is not envisioned as a bui lding or structure, but rather a series of elements that help create a very special sense of place as the beginning of the enhanced park experience along Betty Fo rd Way, between Manor Vail and the Social Courtyard at th e amphitheater. Betty Ford Way Betty Ford Way provides a major pedestr ian access route into the Park, both from Vail Village/Village Parking Stru cture and from the Park’s upper bench parking lot and transit stop. The section of Betty Ford Way between the Covered Bridge and the Amphitheater ent ry is envisioned to be a “feature area”. This pedestrian corridor will be treated with a higher level of design, surface materials, lighting, seating, etc. Enhancements to Betty Ford Way will improve a park visitor’s experience to and through the lower bench of the park. The existing path will be widened from approximately 10 feet to between 11 and 13 feet to a ccommodate the multiple user types that visit the park in peak use times (e.g. pedestrians, bicyclists, skateboarders and roller-skaters) and reduce conflicts when golf cart shuttles share the trail with pedestrians. T he asphalt pavement along Betty Ford Way should be replaced with finer textured, higher quality pavements such as colored concrete, or stone or concrete pavers. Seating areas with benches at select locations along the path, and li ghting fixtures to match ne w architectural features in the park will better un ify the image and character of the entire Park.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 33 April 2012 Landscaping adjacent to Betty Ford Way should be enhanced with additional shrubs and wildflowers to provide more interest and color al ong the route, and new wayfinding signage inst alled. The portion of th e path between the Manor Vail Bridge and the Amphitheater ent rance is the portion of the path that receives the highest level of use. It s hould be of the same character as the rest of Betty Ford Way, but receive a higher level of fini sh on the path surface, and the landscaping should include more floral displays, wh ich will be designed to be complementary to the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens landscape. Nature Trail Improvements to the informal nature tr ail along Gore Creek are envisioned. Lower Bench Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater Host to approximately 60 events each year, the Amphitheater is one of, if not the main activity generator in the Park. A number of improvem ents are planned for this facility. Social Courtyard Expansion of the existing plaz a at the entry to the Am phitheater is intended to provide a more gracious and more functi onal entry to the venue. The design
Ford Park Management Plan Update 34 April 2012 intent and objective for the new “social c ourtyard” is to creat e a multi-use outdoor space of that serves as the primary arri val for the Amphitheater as well as a pre-convene and post-function space during scheduled events. The social courtyard will also serve as a new programmable space within the lower bench of Ford Park for smaller gat herings and events. Use of the space will be available by various groups and stakeholders such as the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens or the Art in Public Places, and the common park user, during times when the amphitheater is not in operation and when there are no scheduled events taking place. The space is envisioned to be richly landscaped, and have a high level of design and attention to detail. Two new gates ar e planned to serve as ticket control and baggage check, and a perimeter landscape barrier combining plants and a decorative artistic fence will be designed to provide se curity for the venue. Portions of the social courtyard are envis ioned to be covered by a roof feature to shelter patrons from rain during incl ement weather and provide shade during sunny days. In this case consideration should be given to the relationship of this structure to surrounding improvements and to how important viewsheds can be maintained. Ticketing/Restrooms/Seating A number of improvements are planned to the operati ons and interior of the Amphitheater. These include expanded ti cket windows, remodeling of existing restrooms and new restroom s at the east entry to the Amphitheater. Re-contouring of the lawn seating area is also planned, the primary purpose of which is to lessen the existing grade of the lawn area. Noise Mitigation The relationship between the Amphitheater and the athletic fields at times creates conflicts, specifically with noise. I-70 traffic also creates problems for the Amphitheater. Noise mitigation studi es have been completed and to date no definitive decisions have been made regarding possible noise mitigation measures. Space between the Amphitheater and the fields has been defined in order to accommodate potential measures that may be pursued in the future (walls, berms, landscaping, etc.).
Ford Park Management Plan Update 35 April 2012 Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater Betty Ford Alpine Gardens The Alpine Gardens are a major su mmer attraction and the following improvements are contempl ated for this facility: North Entry A more formally defined entry to the Gardens from the upper bench, along with improved pedestrian corridors are planned. Garden Expansion Area Expansion to the gardens is planned along Gore Creek, in an area east of the old school house. BFAG Education Center Located proximate to the Ga rdens on the lower bench, the Education Center is envisioned to house administrative offi ces, a greenhouse and a multi-use space for a variety of functions. The building is planned to be two levels (one story with a lower walkout level) with a building footprint of approximately 1500 SF. The BFAG building is envisioned to be west of the old school house. The location is preferred for two reasons – to preserve the Children’s Garden (located
Ford Park Management Plan Update 36 April 2012 just east of the old school, and to not “cro wd” the entry to the Amphitheater. Site design of the building should give consideration to the following: • The building should be “low profile” and not dominate t he immediate area. • The design of the building should be s ensitive to its close proximity to the old school house and should create uni fied compound of structures. • While the old school house and the E ducation Center will be two separate buildings, landscape features, patios, et c. should be used to “link” the two buildings, • Consideration should be given to creat ing a new entry to the gardens that is adjacent to the new building, • The specimen spruce tree should be maintained, • The degree to which the building ext ends to the west should be minimized in order to maintain the existing o pen space and views to Gore Creek from Betty Ford Way. The location of this building is appropria te given its proximity and relationship to the Gardens. However, measures will ne ed to be implemented that will minimize vehicle trips to the building and how winter access is provided. Betty Ford Alpine Gardens
Ford Park Management Plan Update 37 April 2012 Art in Public Places (AIPP) AIPP has an active program in Ford Park. The organization has placed permanent art within the Park, the mo st recent being the Jesús Moroles sculpture. AAIP also uses a portion of the Lower Bench for temporary/summer exhibition space. AAIP has the opportuni ty to utilize other areas of the park which may be appropriate for art insta llations. However, any installation (temporary or permanent) will be evaluated with respect to how it minimizes impacts on other existing facilities and uses in the Park. Service and Delivery The following initiatives are contempl ated to improve the efficiency of and minimize the impacts from service and delivery functions within the Park Central Trash Enclosure A new central trash enclosure (to replace an existing buil ding) is planned at the eastern corner of the parking lot. This is intended to be a fully enclosed building which contains either a trash dumpster or compactor unit. All leaseholders would utilize this central enclosure to dispose of trash generated at their respective facilities. One of the under lying goals of this approach is to not have trash truck traffic within the Park. Amphitheater Deliveries Amphitheater operations necessitate a signi ficant number of deliveries, including on average 8-12 large semi-trucks eac h year (typically delivering for performances) and frequent truck deliveries from food, beer and other vendors. During the peak summer season deliveries from these vendors can be as much as two to four per day. These deliver ies currently access the Amphitheater via West Betty Ford Way and create a very negative impact on the rest of the Park, particularly the highly pedestrianized lower bench area. One of the six goals for Ford Park is to “reduce vehicular intrusi ons into the park” and in response to this a number of alternatives are under consider ation that could dramatically reduce the impact of these delivery vehicles. Consideration has been given to “managemen t solutions”. For example, truck deliveries could be limited to specific time s (i.e. early morning) of day to avoid vehicle/pedestrian conflicts. Given t he constraints Vail already imposes on deliveries in the Vail Village area, it is assumed that further confining delivery times to Ford Park would be impractical on trucks and drivers. Another idea would be to have trucks deliver to the parking lots then off-load deliveries to smaller vehicles. While this may be vi able for some deliveries, it may not be viable for liquor/beer deliver ies due to state laws.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 38 April 2012 The reconstruction of East Betty Ford Way such that all or some delivery vehicles could utilize this corridor (in lieu of enter ing the Park from the west) would greatly reduce vehicle/pedestrian conflic ts. In order to do so th e eastern portion of Betty Ford Way would need be reconstructed to widen the path platform and to reduce steep portions of the path. As noted above, these improvements are already planned in order to improv e pedestrian use of this co rridor. In conjunction with these improvements to the path, the re-desi gn of the new Social Courtyard/Amphitheater entry could be done to accommodate truck turning movements such that trucks could enter from the east, turn around and then exit to the east. While in concept these improvements woul d address a major goal for the Park in reducing vehicle trips and minimizing pedes trian impacts, there are a number of other factors to consider. For example, the cost of these physical improvements must be considered relative to the benefit s (reduction of vehicular trips) and other design implications such as how designing the amphitheater entry to accommodate truck turning mo vements might affect the qualitative aspects of the entry and how the need for retaining walls and the width/alignment of East Betty Ford Way will affect this pedestrian corri dor. These and other considerations will be addressed during the detailed desi gn of these improvements. An existing sewer line servicing the t ennis center needs to be replaced in the East Betty Ford Way corridor and as su ch this pedestrian corridor will be re-constructed to some degree. At a minimu m it is anticipated t hat the path will be enhanced to address the pedestrian im provements described above. The degree to which improvements can be done to accommodate all or some truck traffic will be determined following more det ailed design with further evaluation of the proposal during the Devel opment Plan review process. Access Road Management The gate-controlled entrance to East Betty Ford Way is intended to limit vehicle access to the Lower Bench. This gate/tra ffic control system is also utilized on the west end of Betty Ford Way and should continue.
Ford Park Management Plan Update 39 April 2012 Vail Nature Center The Vail Nature Center is located on the south banks of Gore Creek at the southern end of Ford Park. The Nature Center is intended to be a natural preserve and includes self-guided trails with a small interpretive center that provides environmental and educational programs. Resolution #27 of 1987 documents the Town’s intentions for how the Nature Center is to be managed. No changes are contempl ated for this area. Vail Nature Center
Ford Park Management Plan Update 40 April 2012 Section 7: Capital Improvements Plan for Ford Park This section outlines a five to ten year plan for making physical improvemen ts to the park. The final list of projects will be reviewed and coordinated with Ford Park leaseholders, and adjacent property owners and must be validated through open public participation. Ford Park projects and improvement costs are eligible for Real Es tate Transfer Tax funds and grant funding through Great Outdoors Colorado. Preliminary list of projects: 1. Streamwalk reconstruction. 2. Streamwalk path light installation. 3. Directional sign package design and installation. 4. Additional site furnishin gs installation. 5. West Access Road control gate installation and landscaping. 6. South Frontage Road pedestri an/bike path construction. 7. Relocate eastern softball field. 8. Internal pedestrian path construction. 9. South Frontage Road accel/decel lane construction. 10. Relocate tennis court. 11. Bus stop, parking lot, and main entrance improvements construction. 12. Central trash enclosure design and construction. 13. Manor Vail walkway repair and sign installation. 14. Manor Vail br idge and path recons truction. 15. East Access Road improvement construction. 16. East Access Road control gate installation. 17. Amphitheater loading dock design and construction. 18. Athletic Field parking lo t improvement construction. 19. Nature Center trail reconstruction.