Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutB12-0146 - CR1 - 060412 Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
TOWN OF VAIL' va�i, CO 87657
Te1: 970-479-2128
www.vailgov.com
Development Review Coordinator
TRANSMITTAL FORM
Revision Submittals:
1. "Field SeP'of approved plans MUST accompany revisions.
2. No further inspections will be performed unlil the revisions are approved&the permit is re-issued. �
3. Fees for reviewing revisions are$55.00 per hour(2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance.
��Permit#(s) information applies to: Attention: �Revisions
B12-0146 Martin Haeberle ' Response to Correction Letter
� Qattached copy of correction letter
� I(j Deferred Submittal
�Other
�Project Street Address:
Top of Bridge StreeUSki Yard
(Number) (Street) (Suite#)
Buiiding/complex Name: Gondola 1 Operator's House Description/List of Changes:
Stamp floor plan and elevation sheets,veneer attachment,
Contractor Information
Vail Cor oration d/b/a Vail Associates, Inc. electric panel details, attach soils report(open hole
Business Name: P
Business Address:
PO Box 7 soils report to be submitted prior to footing inspection),
Vail CO 81658 Stamped truss drawings to be submitted upon receipt
City State: Zip:
Bill Kenned from supplier. Address plans examiner comments on
�Contact Name: Y
970-754-2564 Cell: 970331-6029 drawings (no correction letter provided)
Contact Phone: (use additional sheet if necessary)
Contact E-Maie bkennedy@vailresorts.com
Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor&Materials)
.(DO NOT include original valuation)
� I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out � �
in full the information required,completed an accurate plot plan, �Building: $ 0
and state that all the information as required is wrrect. I agree to
� comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town Plumbing: $ 0
ordinances and stale laws, and to build this strucWre according
�� to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- �.. Electrical: $ 0
roved, Intemafy naI Buildin and Residential Codes d other
' ordinan e th�Town appl�icable there o. Mechanical: $ 0 �
�X � / �� Total: $ 0
�Owner/Owner's Representative Signature (Require '
Applicant Information .
��Applicant Name: Bill KBnnedy ' Date Received:
,Applicant Phone: 9�0-754-2564 Cell: 970-331-6029
Applicant e-Maie bkennedy@vailresorts.com
�or Officc Use Only:
Fee Paid:
Received From:
Cash Check#
CQ Visa/MC Last 4 CC# exp.date:
Auth#
01-0cbl I
KOECHLEIN CUNSULTI��G ENGINEERS, IIl�•
COl�'S Ul,T'Il'�'G GE�TEC:R��7CAL..fi11�D M.4IERIALS ENGI11��'E'RS
SQFLS AND FOUI�TDA'TION P�NEST'7GATIO�v
VAIL'S F'RONT'DO�R
LO�T' 2, SEC?'1DN $, T.� SOUIH,R..$0 ti'1E5�, 6'�' P„M,
AI��
AREA SOUTHEAS'T O�' T'HE, LODGE AT VAIL CaNDO?vIINI'UMS
VAIL. COL�RADO
a�� ���� �
����,.....�����,�a
�. � '.�%
.p�
.
• � . _
. .
� : � ;�=
-�� �4,;
�9�' c3�.Z7�z;.Z.y`-':
't•y,�c+••� �; \���
����[`�., �. ��j*\�
�''��.,,,s++7 l��A`1.�`E,��°`�
�repared for:
Terry Winnick, V..P.
Vail Resoris Development Company R�C�����? -
P..�. Bok 9�9
Avon. CO 8I624-09�9 OCT 3 2042
URaAN�E51Gh GnO41P
DEN'rER C��I!'E
Job Na.. 0?-107 Septernber 27, 2002 '
DE.'1'f'ER: 1135! H esr 4famede Prkn�..Suite 11�,Lakewnnd,C'D�l �/aj�'S F'i'dnt DOOT '
A��OA%S'lLiEItTNOR1�'E° (47D) 449-6U09 E�,�;�.on�,��ta� �����#R��oF� RECEIVED
Page$-b ' By David Rhoades at 3:47 pm, Jun 04, 2012
5eptember 2't,2002 K�EC`HL.EIN CONS'UL.T7NG E'NG'l]VEERS, lA'G
3abNo. 02-107 Consulrina Georechnira! Enninrers
TABLE. O� CON�'ENT'S
1 '
SCDPE '
EXECUT'tVE, SUMMARY 2
PROPOS�D CaNSTRUCTION �
SI7'E CONDIT'10NS �
PREVjOUS iNVESTIGAT�ONS �'
3NV E,S T'1GATI ON �
7
RADON
SUBSURFACE CONDIT'30NS �
EXCAVAT�ONS q
SHORTNG 1�
GROUND WA7ER 1�
E'XIST'ING FACILIT'IES �'
FOUNDAT�ONS 1�
F'LQOR SLABS ��
F�UNDATION DRAINAGE, ��
L AT'�'.RAL WAL,L. L.OADS �9
SURFACE DR.AINAGE. �4
COMPAC'TE,D F'ILt. �}
��
L.IMITAT'IONS --
ViC�7*ITTY MAP F'i�,. 1
L,OCAT�ONS OF E',XPL,ORAT�ORY BOR3NGS ���° �
LOGS O�' E.XPLORAT'ORY BOR�NGS �igs,. 3 thru 10
LEGEND OF EXPLORA'T'ORti' BORITIGS �1�� � �
GRP.DA�'lON T'E5T RESULTS F'igs. 12 thru �0
�OUNDAT'lOi�1 E'.7CCAVAS'ION RECOMMENDATI�N �i��� ��
TYP�CAI�.WALL. DRATN DETAiL. Fig. 22
TYPICAL RET'AINING WAL,1_. DRATN DE;TAIL F'ig,, z3
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TE,ST RESULTS Tab�e I
Vai3's Front Door�
Enviranmer�tai Impact Repor# ,
Page S-7 '
September 2'1,20�2 KOECHL.EfN C'OA'S'Ui.77AjG'�h'G'!A'FERS,3NC
3nbNo. 02-10'7 C'onsulEing Geatechnica! Engirreers
SCOPE
This report gresents the results of a soils and foundation investi�ation for the
Vail's Front Door development �acated south and 5011t11�3Si of� the Lodge at Vail
Candominiutns in Vail, Co�orado. The approximate site loeation is shovm an the
Vicinity Map, F'ig ]. T�e pc�rpose of this investi�ation was to evaluate the suhsurface
conditions at the site and to pFOViae �eotechnical reeommendations for the pr��posed
canstruction..
A ]ar�e portion a#' the proposed Vai3`s F'i'ont Daor de�elapment, souih of' the
Lad�e at Vail Condaminiums, has been pr•e�viausiy investigated.. 'I�e reports for the
pre��iously investi�ated area �;rere used in the compilation of this report, T�e purpose of�
this report is to provide descriptions of'subsc�il and graun� water• conditions encountered
in the exgloratary borings, alio��able soi! bearin� capacity, recarr►mended faundatian
systerns, and recommended foundation desi�n and canstruction criteria far praposed
development. This repon was prepared from data devetoped dur�ng the field
in�esti�ation, our laboratory testin�, rev�e«� of' our previaus investigations, and our
ex��rience with similar projects and subsurface cnnditions in the area,
The recommendasians presented in ihis report are based an the propos�d
deveiopment as described in the �'ROP4S�.D CONSTRUCTION 50C�lOTY Of �'11S F�F70rt.
We should be cantacted to review ovr reearnmendation5 when the final pla.r�s far the
Vaif's �ront Door�
Environmental Impact Report
Page B-8
Se�rtember�'7,2Q�2 1C�EC'IILEINC'ON.S'UL.T7NG�'NGTN�EflS',TNC_ ',
3c�bNo 02-1€31 Cansulling Genlec)rnical En�ineers
developmer�t have been compieted. A summary of our f�ndings and conc3usions is '
presented be]ow. '
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY '
1. 7he subsUrf'ace conditions encount�reti in the explaratory borYn�s varied '
wiil� �ocation„ The suhsurface conditions consisted o�' 1 .0 to 10.,0 feet of� ',
existing i�il, to�soii oi� roadbas� underlai� by either a dense to very dense,
sanciy�r�avel witli cobUles and houlders or•a dense to very derise, silty sand
with so�ne gravei to �arying deptl�s af' S.0 to 30.,0 feet, The existi�� fill
was charactez�iz,ed by a loose to mediuin dense, silty, sandy gravel wilh '
some cobbies Practicai dcill rib t�efixsal on houlders was encountered in
explaraiory borings T�I-3 {40-09'7} tt�cu TH-I1 {00-097), TH-13 (00-097} ',
thru T'H-f9 {00-09'7) and in T'H-1 (98-348), TH-2 (98-34$), 'FH-4 {98- '
348}, and TH-5 (98-348) in our previous investigations„ ',
?, �;xzsting f+l1 to vaiying de��ths of I.,O tc� 1Q,0 feet was encauntered at this ',
site, The existing fill wilf �3eed ta he r�ernoved from all constrvctian areas ',
pr�ior ta coz�struction. ''
3 Ground water was encounter�ed in TI-i-3 (9$-3�#$} at a depth of' 2.0..4 feet ',
anc] in TH-22 (02-107) at a degth o#� 17,.0 feet at tiie tirr�e eacii boiin� was ,
clrilie�l,. Ground w�ter was nat e�lcountered in any otl3er bot�inbs for this ,
investigation or• in previous investigations, Ref'er� to the GROUND '
WA`i'rR sec#ian of tliis repnrt for additional detai�s,
4 We antici�ate that th� existin� f31 will be encountered at the pr•oposed ,
foundatioi� elevations In our opinior� �he existin�; fl� will not safe�y ,
support ioundaiions, l�i aur o�inion the under�lying natur�al, san�y grave! '
wii� su��ort spread footing foundation systems for ti�e proposed buildings '
and addit�o�s, Refe�' to tlze FOUNDAT'IONS section of this report for -
compiete recorr3mendations.
S We anticipate t�at the soils at the potential iloor slab elevatians wi1� '
co�nsist of existin}; fiil. li� aur opinion the existing �l� will not safely
support slab-on-grade floors. li� our opinian tlie under9ying natura} sandy ',
gravei Qr pi�o�erty moisture canditioned and eom�actecl structura� fill will '
V ail's �€�ont Doos� ,
2 Envir�onme�tal imp�ct Repor't
Page B-9
5eptember 2'7.2Qa2 I+O�C'NLEIN G'011'S'ULT7NG'ENG'lNEEK.S,INL'.
3obNo.02-10'T Goasetlfiree Gen�echnica! Engineers
satisfactorily support slab-on-�rade floors, Refer ta the F'LOOR SL.ABS
sectian of ihis repon for comp�ete recammendations '
6 Because cabbles and bouiders we�'e encountered in the expjoratory
bor�ngs, we anticigate that heavy-duty excavation eq�igment ���ill be
necessary to cornplete the required excavations..
7. Draina�e around �he structures shou�d be desi�ed and constructed to
provide for rapid removal of s�rface runoff' and avoid concent�ation of
water ad}acent to foundatian walls.
PR�POSED CONSTRUCTION
A hand drawn preliminary site plan was pmvided by Vai� Resorts Developrnent
Corr�pany prior to �ur f eld investigation,. The preliminary site plan presented the
locations o#� the existing struc�ures and propos�d structures. At the time of this
investination, the final development plan f'or Vail's Front Door has nat been completed,
We �ncierstartd that the pr�oposed der�e3opment invoives the canstruction of� resitfential
struct�res, a 5�3�T C�Ub, ad�itions to the L.od�e at Vai� Condqminiu�ns, a skier services
hui�din„ ad��tiaRS to buildin�s southeast af the Lodge ac Vaii, and possibly the
relacat�on of�the Vista Bahn Lif�.
She reside�tial buildings and skier club south af�the Lodge at Vail Condominiums
are located in an area previausly investi�a�ed by Koechlein Consultin� E,ngineers, �nc.
Based on the pretiminary development pians, the propo�ed plans are similar to those
plans assurned in our previous investi�ations. We anticipate that the bui�din�s will be 2
to 3-stories in height with ] below �r'ade le�el We anticipate that excavations vp to j 5
-,
VailTS �I"Oii� DODC'
' E�vir�onrr�e�tal Impact Report
Page B-10
September 21,2002 KDGC'NL.EIN C'OlYS'UL.7lNG'�"NCIN�'ER.S', 1NC.
JobNo �2-107 Cnnsultin�,= Grnieclr►rira! F.ngeueers
feet �nay Ue required fai� constr�ction of ihe bui�dings witltin the existin� hitlside [f
excavatians �reater t�ian l S feet are r•equired for construction of t��e ��o�osed bui�dings,
we sllo�lc� he contacted io revie�v our� ieco�z�mendatic�ns, We anlicspate t�iat tltie �roposed
buildings will �be of cast-in-�lace cor�ci°ete a��d ��oad frame const�vclion �vitli slab-o�-
�rat�e t'�oors.. Maxirnui�� column anc! wail �oa�1s for the }�c'oposed ��esidences and ski clu�
�7lli�dlE3� were assun�ed to be those normally associated witl� residential struclures and
li�itit camrnercial structures
7lie area ��ot previaus�y in��estigatecl includes tize ac�ea of the skier� services ,
buiiciinb, ac3ditions to tl�e L,od�e a� Vail, additions to the Uuildi��bs sout��east of�tl�e Lodge
at �fai1, ancl tl�e relocation of�the Vista Ba1ti�� Lif't We antici�ate i��at llie skier' services '
buildinb will he u� to one-story in heiglit and �vill be of'cast-in-�iace concrete a�d ��c�od '',
f'rarne cnnstruction wilia slab-oi�-grade floors We c!o not believe thaE a basement oi '
l�elo`v gc�acle area wiil he constructec! 4'or the proposed Uuilc�in�. W� anticipate ',
excavations of' uP ta 5 feei i�a depth will he required for� construction o�' tlie �ropased '
buiiclinb in ordei 10 remove t��e existin�; �11. We anticipate tl�at tl�e pr'o�osec� acic�itions tc�
the L,oc�ge at Vai� anc� otlier l��iildin�s southeast of the Lod�;e will �e ane to two siories iti
l�eight wit�� hasez�ents �nd slab-on-grade f]oors. Lxcavations foz� the a�iciitions may be �p
to i2 feet in depth. T4ie relocated lif� builciin�; will be a sing�e-story buildin� witll s��b-
on-gr�ade #]oors, bui with n� haserr�ent or cra�vlspace Maximum column and wall laads
Vail`s F'r�ont Doar�
4 Environmental Irnpact Repar•t
Page B-1 l
September 27,2002 KOECNL:EIN C'ONS'Ul.TING EA'GINEERS,ING.
3obNo. O?-10'7 Consullirrg Geotechnical Eag+neers
were assumed To be those r�ormally associated with iight t� medium cammercial
structures.
SiTE. CONDTTIONS
Vail's Front Doar develapment will be located immediately south and southeasi of
the Lod�e at Vai3 Condominiums in Vai�, Colorado. Access to the s�te is from a �ravel
road off'of�Vail Road. 7�e ]ocat�on of'the roa� is shown on the Locations of'Explaratory
BflT'1T1�5, �ig. 2,. The area of�the pro�rosed residences and ski club bui]ding consists of an
undevelaped slope covered with tcees, shrubs, v�Jee�s and �asses A portion of'the slope
has been cleared of' all trees and ve;etation in this area consists of��ass. The overall
slope of'the existin�hill is dou�n tow�ards the narth-northeas�.
T�he area o#'the propnsed ad�itions for the Lod�e at Vasi is immediately sauth of'
the existin; buildin� and consists of'a parkin� lot and is �ener�al�y level ?he parti�n of'
the developrner�t for the building additions southeast of� #he Ladge at Vail, the slcier
services buildin� an� the relocation of'the Vista Bahn Lift consists of'a deve�oped area
southeast of the Lod;e at Vai! Condominiums. T'his area incluc�es a portia� south of'the
existing Vista Bahn Lift.. 7his area has been deve�oped with an existing lift, sing��•-story
buildin�s, mulii-story buiidin�s and landscapin�. T�e averali s�ope of'this area is down
towards the north-nnrtheast. Ve�etation on the site consisis of�grass.
Vail's Fr•ont Door
S Environmental Irripact Repar•t
Page B-12
September Z'7,2E}02 KOECNL.EfN C'OA'S'UL7'!1�'G'LrNG7NEERS,tl�'C.
7obNa.42-107 L'nnsrtdlrna GenFechniccf En�ineers
PRE;VIOUS TNVES�IGATi�NS
Two previous geotecfinical irs��estigations were perfbrmed for the southern ponion
nf'the �roposed Vail's Front Door development, This area o#�the prapased development ',
incl�des the residential buildin�s, sl:ier club and the additians to the LodRe at Vail. This ''
area has been previausly Fnvesti�ated by Koechlein Consultin� Engineer�s, �nc. 7he data
and results of these previous investi�ations have been reviewed and included in the '
prepara4ion c�f� this report. The foliowing reports were reviewed and informatian from
the�n used in compilation of this report..
1„ Koechlein Consultin� En�neers, Inc., Prelimirran� Geotechnical
Inve.s�tiaarion, Pr��pos�ed Developmenl, The ?'1�ade Parcel, Lot ?. Section �,
�.5 Soutli, R RD T�est. Fith P:Ai., Varl, Colorado, Decemher 3, 1998, Job
No„ 98-348.
?„ kaech�ein Cansultin� E,n!_ineers, Inc.., Sails a�id Fotu�datinn Irati�esrtgation
pr•�posed Btrrldirz,�s, Yarl Lodge - Tr�ade Par•cel, Lot ', Sectior2 8, T.�
Sotttl:, R 80 1�'e.st. E'' P.A�., Yail, Color�ado, July 11, ?000, .lob No. 00-097,
INVFST']GAT'10N
Subsurf'ace conditic�ns f'vr this im�esti�ation were perfarrned at �his site on
September 1'7, 300? by dr�llin� four ex�,joratory borin�s, TH-20 {02-107) thru TH-23
(0?-10'7), with a 4-inch diameter soiid stem flighc power au�er at the locations shown on
the Locations of Exp�oratory Barings, Fi�. ?.. An engineer from our of'fice was c�n the site
to supervise the drillin; of the exploratary borin�s and visua�ly classify and document the
subsur€ace so�3s and �round water conditions. Our engineer also obtain�d representative
Vail's Fr�ont Door '
b E.nviro�mental Impact Repor•t '
Page B-13
5eptember 2 7,2002 K�ECFIL.EIN C'ONSULT'ING ENC'F?1`�ERS*I�IC,
]obNo. Q2-107 Cansultine Gentechnical �ngin�ers
sar�ples of'the soils withir� the exploratory bor�ngs to �e examined �n our �aboratory. A
description of the subsurface soils obsen�ed in the expioratory barin�s for this
im�esti�ation and from our previous investi�ations (.Job Na. 98-�45 and 3ab Na, 04-097)
is shown on the L.a�s of E.xploratory Bor�n�s, Fi�s. 3 ihru l0; and an the Legend of�
E�:ploratory Borings, �'ia 1 l.
O�r ]aboratory investi�ation included visual classification of' al] samples and
testin� of s�lected samples far natur•al r�aisture content and ;�adation analysis. Resu�ts
of'che laboratory tests for chis investigation and our previaus investi�ations (..�ob Na.. 98-
;48 and 3ob No. 00-�9'7) are presented on the Logs �f'�xp�or�atory Borin�s, Figs.. ;3 thru
]0; on the Gradatior► ?est Resu�ts, Fi�s.. 12 thru 20; and in the Sumrrzary of' Labaratary
T est Results, T'able I ''
1'tABON '
In recent years, radon �as has become a concern. Radon gas is a colorless, ',
ndorless gas that is produced by the decay of�minerals in soi] and rock. T'he pot�;�tial for� '
ra�on Das in the suhsurface strata of mountain terrain is likel,y, Due to the �ran�lar nature
of' the natural sflifs, it is o�r ogi�ion that the risk for radan gas at this site is iow.
However, because be�ow �rade areas may be consiructed for the proposed residences and
additions to tt�e L.od�e at �'ail anci other buildin;s, we recomrnend that the be�ow grade
areas he desi�ed with ��en€ilation to re�uce the risk of'radon gas buiid-up in these areas.
Vail's Fr�ant Dovr�
� EnvEr�onme�tal �mpact Repor•t
Page B-14
September 2'7,2003 I►0ECHI.�IN CON5'UL7'Il!'G'ENG'7NEERS',IA'C.
JobNo. 42-107 CATJ54f�iTtta Gentechni'caf Enrineers
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Subsurface canditions encountered in the expioratory bo�ings for t�iis
investieation [TH-20 (4.2-107} thru TH-23 {02-]07)j were simi�ar 'The subsurface
conditit�ns consisted of 4 inches of�topsoil underlain l�y an existing fill to varyin� depchs
of' S 0 to 6.0 feet., The existing fill was char•acterized by a dark brnr�rn, moist, medium
dense, silty sandy �ra��e3. Beiow the existin� f'tll, to the rnaxirr»rn depth explored of.20,0 '
feet, ihe subsurface conditions consiste� of'a natural, light br�owr� to br��wn, dry to moist, '
ciense to very dense, si�ty, sandy gravei with scattered cabbles and boulders, '
The subsurface conditions encountered in the e�;ploratory borings for�a�r previous '
investi�ations {Jab No. 95-3�48 and .Job No. 0�-[?97) varied with location. The suhsvrface
canditions consisted of' 1.0 to �0.0 feet of' existin� fil1, topsoil ar �•oadbase u�dariain by '
either a ciense to very dense, sandy �ra�le] wiih cobbles and bouiders ar a dense to very ',
ciense, silty sand with some �rave� to �aryin� depihs of'S..O to �0 0 feet.. The existsn� fill '
was charac�erized by a lc�ose to medium dense, silty, sar�dy �ravel utith some cobbles. ''
Practical dril! rig refusal on boulders �;�as encountered in exploratory borin�s T'H-8 (DO- '
097) t�ru TT�-11 (DO-091}, T'H-�3 �00-d97} thru TH-�9 {DO-09'7) and in TN-1 (98-:348),
�'H_2 (gg-;4g), TH�-4 (98-348), and TH-� (98-345) in nur previous investigatians
Ground water was encountered in �'H�-3 (9�-348) at a depth of' 20.0 #'eet and in
T'H-ZZ (0�-]07) at a depth of' 1'7.0 feet at the time each borin� was dri��ed Ground water :
Vail's Fro�t Door�
S Envir�onmentaf Impact Report '
Page B-1S
s�������'�,2�a2 �aECx�.�rN cot�'S'UL7T11'G'ENGIN�L�RS, rntc:
3obNo.,02-l07 Cansvlterrg Geatech�ica! Enaincers
was not encauntered in arEy other bor�ngs for this investigation or in previaus
investi�atians
E.XCAVAT�ONS
We anticipate that excavations o�up to 15 feet may be required #or constr�ction of'
the proposed residentiai and ski elub buildin�s within the existin; slope alon� fh4
sauthwest side of� the subject site.. If' excavations greater than 15 feet are requir��ci for
canstructi�n of ihe pr�aposed hui�dings, we should be contactsd ta review our ;
recommendations, �.xcavations ran'ing from � to 13 feet in depth may be r�equired fior '
construction of'the propased additions, �ift terminal a�d skier services huildin�.. Because '
c�hbies and bou3ders ��ere encountered ufithin the explar•atory borinE�s, it is our opinion ',
that ]�eaw-d�ty excavation ec�uipment «�ill be necessary to complete the required
excavations.
Gare needs t� be exercised durin� construction so that the exca�ation slopes
remain siable. in our o�inion, the existin�, moist, �andy �ave� #ill, natura� si�ty sand
with �ravel, and the �aturai, moist, sandy �ravei classify as T'ype B soils in accor�ance
with OSHA. Wet or sat�ra�ed natural sandy gra�el will classify as Type C soils in
accordar�ce with �SHA re�ulations. OSHA re�ulations should he followed in any
excavatior�s or cuts. In order to re�uce the size of the rec��ired excavations temporary
shorin�may�e�sed Refer to ihe SHORiNG sectian af this report for additional details.
9 Vaii's F'ront Door�
Envir•€�n�enta[ lm�gact Repor�t
Page B-16
Septernber 2'7,2002 KQ�CFlL,EfN C�NS'ULT7A'G ENG1N£,�'!t5',ING
3pbNa.02-1a7 Consul�inQ Geotechhica! Engineers
All existing fi11, foundations, and soft soils beneath the proposed constn�c�ian
sha�ld be removed, and if' necessary, replaced with properly moisture conc�itione.� and
compacted fill, Refer to the �XISS'�T1G F'ACILITiES sect�on of'this re�►Qrt far add�tional
details. All fill should be placecl and carnpacted as recommended in the COMPACTE'D
�'ILL section of'this report.
SHOR'�NG
jn order to reciuce the size of' the excavations and limit the disturbance of'
constructian, temporary shorin� rriay be used„ A typical shoring system rxsed for c�eep
excavations includes piles (either dri�ren or socketed in pre-drilled holes) as soldier posts
with la��in� However, due to the presence o#' cabbles ar�d boulciers, driving or pre-
drillin� holes with comTentiorial drilling equipment may not be possible, An a}ternative
tn driven piles ar socketed pi�es using con��entional drilling equipment as saldiei� posts
could be multiple �ninipiles ir► conjunction with tie-backs, which can be dri]led thrt�ugh
the cohhles and b�u]det•s Minipi]es are installed by driliing ai�d advancinb a casing into
the �rou�ci to the desired ciepth. �re hole is then filled with �out as the casing is
removed fr�m the hole„ Where �round ti�Ja�er is enco�r�tered, �t is sometimes necessary to
ieave t�e casi�g in the graund to prevent water from enterin� the hole. Mu�bple
m�nipi3es in conjunction with tie-backs co�ld he used as soldier posts for a sa3dier post
and la�gin,�shor�ns system.
�a Vail's Fr•ont Door
Envir�rtmental Irrapact Repor�t
Page B-17
Se€�tember 2'1,2002 IiQE'C'I{LEIN CONS'UI,77NG�'NCl1Y�E11S.ll�'C;. '
Jo6No 02-1fl�7 Consulting G'eo�rcfruiea� Engineers
An alternative slioring systeni ihat inay also be considered far titis site is a soii '
nailed shoring system. Installatian of a soil naiied sharin� system will be in#luenceci hy '
the piesence of�cobl�les and bouldet�s anc! by the p�'esence of ad�acent existing structures '
and utilities. P�ap�rty baundaries may also limiE how f'ar the sl�orin� system can exiend '
l�eyanc] the excavation and i�itrude i��ta the ad,�ae�nt property. Therefore, othe�� n�etl}ods,
such as interior hraciii�, �ray need to Ue evaluated. '
The ability to cc�mplete the excavatians ti�itliin the site constraints and tl�e nee� for� '
,� 5I1DClE7� system Zi1C�LiC�ITI� 1�1� iYp� q� 5Y51e177 sl}ouid be �vaivated di�rin�; the desi�n
�hase of' tfie projeci. Base� an t��e subsurface conditians encounter�eti durin� t��is '
investi�atioE� anc� our ��revio�s invesii�ation, the sl�oring sysieni may be c�esignecl usin�; '
tiie f�ullue�+in� e�gineerin� soil c]tar�acteristics for tl�e natural sandy �;ra�e1: c�' = 38°, y =
135 �sf', c= 0. ',
lE'soi! nails are tisecl as �art of tlte sl�oring system, theic pullout ca}�acity wiil be ',
influenced Uy the existii�� soii co��ditions, �i7ethod of'ilole advancement, ha�e diameter, '
boncieci le���;t1i, �rout type, and groutin� pressute. roz� prelimiilary desi�n �urpases, thc
soil t3ails may be ciesibned usinb an ultiniate utiit resislattce of'24 kpf; assunzi��; that tlie
soil nails are sn�all diameter� a��c� are bacfCfiliec] wit}i !ow-pressc�r'e �;rouk in the natural '
sandy �ravel.
Vail's �r�ont Door� '
� l Environrrtental Impact Report
Page B-18
September 27,2Q(�2 I+OE'C'H1.EIN C'ONS'UL.Tf;�G ENClNEER.S,TNC..
3obNo.OZ-1�7 C'onsulrirrg Georech►rical Enginetrs
GROUND WATER
Ground water r��as encovntered in 'T'H-3 {98-34�} at a depth o�� :?0.� feet and in
TH-2? (02-107) at a depth of 17.0 feet at the time each baring was driiled. Grounci water
was not encountere� in any other borings for this investi�ation or in previous
investi�ations., Since we anticipate excavations to a depth c�f�� tv i� feet may be required
far constrvctian af'the praposed buiidin�s and additions, it is our oginion that the r�sk of
a pund ivater influencin� the construction of' the proposed buildin�s is low. However,
shallow �ae�nd water from localized sprin�s �as been encauntered in various �r�ojects
a�on; Fores# Raad and Beave�� Dam Road durin� the late spring and early svmmer
months Therefore, depenciin� upon t�e time of construction, it is possib�e t��at gt�ound
water may be encounterec�. If' �round t�rater is encountered durin� excavations for the
praPosed buildin�s, speciaf precautions may be requ�red �ur�n� constn.�ction, T'�ese
precautions may include temporary dewatering trenehes, pumping from ti�e e�:ca�ation
d�rin� construction or possit�ly mvre elaborate and expensive ternporary dewatexing '
SYSTe1715, ''
T'o reduce the potential r�s�: of �aund water enterin� the excavation from
locali�ed sprin�s, we recomme�d that COI�StTUCt10F1 take glace after peak runoff' time, ,
which is typically July 15 'Ta �'urther reduce the ris� of' �round water infiltration,
constr�action should take place at the end af August. Startin; construction at the times ',
outli�ed abo��e wiil not eliminate the risi: c�f water entering the excavation. Hnwever,
Vail's Frnnt Doar '
1� E:nvironmental Impact Repart '
Page B-13
5epternber 2'7,2002 KO�C'HI,.EIN C'Ol�'SUL.7ING'ENG'Ih'EERS', !NC
iobNo. O?-107 C'nnsulting Geotechnical Erreineera
they tend to reduce the risk of water infiltration and i#'water is encauntered, the amount
of water enterin�the excavation is typieally less than other tirtzes of'the year
If ground waier is encauntered �uring constructian of the praposed buildin�s and
additians, we should be contacted to review o�r �'oundation dra.in recornrnendatians. It
may be necessary to re��ise our foun�a�ivn drain recommendations and aiso provide an
underslab dr�ain system f'or the buildings and additions.
EXiSTING FACiLITIES
We anticipate that priar to canstruction of'this pqrtion o#' the deve��gment, the
existin� struct�res and utiiities v�rill be remo�ed. We recommer►d that exis�in;
fnundatians, slahs-an-�r'ade, utilitie5, and existing fil� be completeiy removed and, if'
necessary, replaced ��ith properly rnaisture conditioned and compacted fill �riar to
consmaciian of' the new faciiities, A representative from our affiee should observe the
complete.� dernolition and removal af' the existi�� favndatians, slabs-on-grade, uti�ities,
and existing fill in order to verify that they have beer� completely removed„
Provided that the existin� fill is free of deleterious material, the existing fill rnay
be used as structural f�l! for chis project. All filI for this projec# sho�ld be moist�re
treated and campacted as recammended in the COMPACTED FILL section af tl�is re�ort„
A representative frorn our of�ice shauid �bserve and/or test the removal of't�e existing
13 Vail's Fr�ont Door•
E�vironrnefltaE Impact Repor�t
Page B-20
5eptember 27,200� KOEC'HLEIN C'OA'.5'UL.TIR'G EI�'Gf,'t'EEliS, IIVG
1abNo 02-107 L'orrsulrinb Gentechrtical Enainetrs
faundations, siabs-on-grade, associated utilit�es, and existing fill, as well as the ptacement
and compaction of'any fill beneath the new faciiities. ',
FOUNDATIONS
The subsur�'ace rnateria� at the potentiat foundation e�evati�n for the praposed ,
buil�in;s and additions cansist af' eit�ier #he existing filt, naturat sandy �avel or silty '
sand with some a avel. In our opinion, the existing fill will not safely sugpart a spreaci '
footing foundation system. T�e existin; fill s�ould be remaved and replaced u�ith '
pragerly moisture canditioned and ca�ngacted structural fil! prior to #'oundation !
canstreaction,. After remaval and replacement of the existin; fill, it is our n�i�ian that the ',
�ro�osed buiidin�s and additions may be supported by spread #oc�tin�s bearing an the
natt�ra3 sandy �ravel, silty sand ar compacted fill, We recommend that tl�e s�read footin� '
foundation syssems be desi��ed and eonstructed to meet the followin� criteria: ',
l . F'ootin�s should be supporteci by the undisturbed natural sandy gravei, '
silty sand or properly moisture conc�itioned and compacted fil�, as '
c�escrih�below in Items 2, 3 1, 12, and 13. '
2., All existin� fill must be remo�ed fram below praposed #'o��ndatians, �f '
necessary, properly moisture treated and compacted structural fill rnay be ',
p3aced beneath the proposed #oundations in ord�- to raise the levei of the '
excavation af�er remo��ai o#' the existino f 1l If stn�ctural fi11 is plaeed '_
beneath the proposed foundations, ar� equa] depth o#' fiIl must be piaced ''
be3ow the entire foundation 7he fill beneath the praposed #ootings shaujd '
extend �eydnd the proposed footin�, as shoum in the Fa�ndat�an '
E,xcavation Recommendation, �'ig. 23. AIl structural f}l placed beneat� '
fo�ndations must be mais[ure treated and compacied as recommended in '
the COMPACT'�D FILL, section of'this report. Placement af'the fill rn�st '
14 Vai1's Frout Door
Envir•anmentat Irnpact Repor�#
Page B-Z1
Septembos 27,2��2 KDEC'HLEIN C'ON5UI.7INt"i'ENG'f11'��'R,S�!11'G.
1obNo.02-107 Consulfiag Gentechnitaf Ea�ineers
be observed and tested an a fisll tirr�e basis by a representative fmm o�r
office
�, We recommend waIl and column footin�s be desi�ed for a maximum
a�lowable soi]bearin� px�essua�e �,000 psf'.
4, Spread footin�s constructed on the natural sandy �rar�el, silty sand or
properly moisture treated and compactet� structural f Il may experience up
to 0„S inches of� diff'erential movement between founc�ation elements..
Because the soils are grar�ular in nature, we anticipate that the rnajority of'
the differential settlement wil] occur during canstrvction.
� Cansrivction of'new foundation excavations next to existing footin�s rnay
cause undercutting of the sails beneath the existing #ootings., 'The loss a�'
support couid result in settlement of�the existin� footings, Tlie iocatian of'
the new foundation needs to be evaluated during design., The placernent of'
Ehe new faundatior�s should be sueh that they do not re�uce t�e stability of�
the existin� foundations during constn�ctian, The new foundations shauld ',
be located such that they meet the require�nents presented in ]tem 6, '
6 E.xcavation f'or �'oundations adjacent to existin� structures sh�t�id be ',
perforr�ed with care. The excavatian sho�ld he rnade sn that existino ',
fnundations and floar s�abs are not undermined Excavations adjacent to '
existin� structures should be excavated at a i ta 1 slope (H�rizontat to ''
V ertical)., '
7. Wall footin�s and foundatian wails should be desi�ned to span a distance ',
of' at least i0.0 feet in or�der to account for ar�omalies in the soil ar '
compacted fiI1. '
S Foun�ation watl bac�:f il sh�uld not be considerec� for snpport of' load '
bearin� footings, Footings shouid be stepped and supporte� by ',
undisrurbed r�atura! sandy gr�vel or silty sand and shouid not be
constructe� an foun�ation wall backfil!. Foun�ation walls ar grade beams
should be desi;ned to span across an excavation backfill zone and should
not be eonstructed u7th footin�s wiihin this zone.
9, The base of' the exterior foatings shou�d be establishe� at a minimum
depth below the exterior gro�nd surface, as rec�uired by the ]oeal bui�ding
Vail's FE•ont Door�
�$ ERVir�onmental Impact Repor�t
Page B-22
5eptember 2l,2002 KOECNL.EIN C'DII�SUL.T'ING E'NGlNEER.S, 11YC,
3o6No.fl2-1�7 C'ansulfing G'eaterl�itical Erigirreers
code„ 4Ve believe tha� tE�e depti� for frast pr•otection iti t1�e local huildin�
coc�e in ihis area is 3.5 feet,
1�. Co]umn �'ooiin�s shauld llave a mi�imu�t� dime�ision of 24 inches squar•e
and continuaus wall #ootin�s s��ould liave a minirnunj widtl� o#' 16 inclfes.
Fooling widtlis may be gt°eater�to accoinmo�ate st�-vctural design loads„
i 1 We antic�pate that col�Ules and bouldez� �vill l�e encounker�ed at t�ie
foundatior� ekevatiQn. Removal of'the ca�bies and ho�lder•s may resu�t in '
dCpCe551DR5 and r�o�tg1� bottoms in the excavaiion. Th� resulting
depressioi�s cai; �e backfi�led wit1� compacted backfill or iea� co�►cr•ete. '
Refer co the COM1'ACI'ED FIi.L seclion of' this t�epor�t for backfil!
rec�uir•ements. '
12,. Pockets or layers of'existin� fF11 �zay be encountered in the bottain of'ti�e '
completed taaiing excavations, 7'hese materials shauici be remaved to ',
expose the undisi�rbe�, nafvr�al sandy gravel ar silEy sand. The '
ioundations should be ca�lsti°�ictecl on tlie natur�al sanciy �ravel, silty sand '
or new cotnpacleci str�icttir�at fiil. Refer ta tl�e COMPACTE.D ��LL '
sectio�� of this re�o�t fnr backfili r�ec�uirements, ',
1:3 Fill s�ioi�ld be �lacec! �nci com�acted as ouilinecl in the C4MPACTED ''
TILL, seclEOii of� this r�e��ar�t. We recoznmend tl�at a representative of' our '',
of�ice obsenje a�1c� test ilie �lacement and compaction �F' structur•al fi!1 ''
use�l ir� fau�dation construction. It has been our experience that without
e�igineering quality control, poar CURS�IUCtIOR techniques accur wl�icl7 ''
resu�t in pnor Faun�ation ��e��fonnance '
��4, W� recommc:�u! lhat a re�r�eseiltative of'our� of�ic� ahserve t�ie corn�leted
f'ounc�atio�ti excal�atioi�. Vaiiatians f�om tl�e conditions c�escribed in this
report, whicl} �vec�c not inciicatecl �y our borin�s, can occur, Ti�e '
representative can oUserve tl�e excavation to evaluate the exposec�
suUsurface canciitions
F'LOOR SLABS
Tl�e sut�sur�face sai�s at lhe t]oc�r siab elevatiflzas consisted oF'existing fi�l, ln our ,
o�it�ia�t the existiE�g iili wi!! not sa�'ely support slab-on-grade floars, Hawever, it is our '
l6 Vail's Front Door•
Environmental Impact Repor�
Page B-Z3
5epterrEber 2'7,20a2 KOEC'H1.E7�1'C'0�1!S ULTING ENG'INL�L�'It�,IA'�. ',
3ohNo 02-107 C'ansulling G'ealecbniral Engrneets ',
opinion that the underlying natUral sandy gravel, silty sand or new compacted structura.] '
fili will s�pport slab-on-grade floors with a low ris� of'movernent. We anticipate that
s3abs-or�-grade constructed on the na#ural soi�s or prop��iy moisture treated and ',
compacted structural f 1] rnay experience up to 0„25 inch of�moverrient,. We recornmend '
the follov�rin� grecautions f'ar the construction of'slab-on-€rade flaars:
j , Slabs shouid be plac�ti on the natut�al sandy b�avel, silty sand or nevv '
corr�pacted fill. All existing fill ar sc�ft soils beneath slabs-on�-grade s}iQUld ',
be remaved prior to placement o#'fi�� or construction af flnors. '',
Z. A s�abgrade mod�}us of'20Q pci may be use� for desi;m of'siabs-on-�rade.
�. Slabs shou3d be separated from exterior wa11s and interior bearing '',
members. Vertical mo�ement of�the slab should not be restricted. !
4 Exterior slabs should be separated fr�am ihe buildin�s, T'hese slabs should ',
be reinforced to function as independent units. Movement of' these slabs '
shouid not be transmitted directly to the foundations or walfs af the '
strucfure.
5. Fre.quent control joints should be prn�ided in ali stabs to red�ce problems
associated v��ith shrinka�e
b. lf �rounci water is encountered durin� constructian of' the proposed
huildin�s ar additions, we should �e contacted to review the need for an
undersla6 drain sysiem.
7. �il� beneath 5iabs-on-�ades may cons�st of'on-site soils free of�deleterious
material or approved fiii Fill should be placed and compacted as
recommended in the COMPAC?'ED FIiL section of this report,
Placement and co�n�saction of fl] beneath slabs should be observed and
tested by s representative of�our office.
� � Vaif's Fr•o�t Door�
En�ironmenEal Impact Repart
Page B-24
5eptem'oer 27,2DQ? 1L'DEC'NI.EIN C'ONS'ULTIR�G EA'G'fNEER.S',IA'G.
1obNa a?-107 Cnrrsulrrng Georechnicaf Engirreers
FOUND.4'fION DRAINAGE
Surface water tencis to flo�� throu;h relativeiy permeable backfill typicallY �ounci
ad�acent to founc�ations, T�e water that flows throu�h the f�jl callects on the surface of
relatively impermeable soils occurring at tl�e foundation elevation. Both this surface
water and gossible ground waier can cause wet or moist below grade canciirions after '
construction..
Beeause belo�;� �rade areas are anticipated for same of the k�uiidin�s and ',
ad�itions, we recommend the installation o#' a drai� along t�3e �elo��� gr-ade founc�ation ',
walls T'he foundation cira:in will help reduce the risk af hydrostatic pressure devel�ging '
' on founciation walls and nf' �rour�d watei� infiitrating into the below grade areas. 7he '
drain should consist c�f�a 4-inch diameter perforated pipe encased in free dra�nin� aravel
and a r,�an�factured wal! drain. T�e arain s�ould �e slop�� so that water flows to a
�ositive �ravity ovtlet ar tn a sump where the water can he removed by p�mping..
Recommended details for a typicai fo�ndatian wal] drain are �resented in the 'T'ypicai
Wa�l Drain Detail, Fig. ??. �f �round �c�ater is encaun#ered durin; excavation for the
propased buiidir►�s and add�tions, we shnuid be contacted tn review our foundation dr�ain
recommer�dations.
�� Vaif's Front Door�
Envit�onmental Im�act Repart
Page B-25
September 2'7,2002 IC�EC7fL,L•1N C'ONS'UL,T7NG'ENGINLCRS'.INC:,
3obNa.02-10'7 Consulfing Gentechnicaf F.ng+xrrrs
LATE.RAL WALL L.OADS
We anticipate tl�at helotiv gracfe walis, z��►ich wili renuire iater�a� eartti pre$sures fior !
c3esig�� will be constructed, Lateral eartli Pressur�es depend on t]�e type af'backfiil and the '
heibl}t ancl ty��e of� wali. Walls, �vhicl} are iiee ta r�otate sufficiently to i�c���ilize ihe ',
stren�;th af'tiie backfill, s�iou3d �e designed to resist the "active" eartll �r�essure condition.,
W�]ls tl�at a��e FeS�I'aiT]£[� stiould �ie desi�ned fo Te515E the "�t rest" earf�i p��ess�ire
conditio�l The fallowing tabie �resents the �ateral wal! �ressur�es that may be used for
design
Carth 1'ressure Cor�dition E.quivalent F�uid Pressure'
����
Aciive �S
At-rest 5�
!'assive 3�d
Notes:
1 Cquiva�ent (luid �ressures are ior a hvrizoi�tal �acki`iil conditioi� with no hyd��ostatic
pressures or live 4aads.
2, A coe��ieient of'frictiar� of'4,� may he used at tl�e base o#�retaining wa1! ot�spread
footings tn resist latera! wall �oads.
Backfill Placed he��i�1c1 or acljaccnt to 1nt�ndation walls anci retainir�g wa�ls sl�ou��d '
he �laeecl and compaetecl as r•eco�nrnended in tj�e COMPACTED �1LL seetion of' this ''
��e�ror�t, f'lacement and comPaction of the fill should be observes� and iested by a ',
representative af'our of�ice
Due tn the sio�e of' t��c existin� hi!! in the soutl�west corner of the site, w� '
anticipate tltiat retaining wa�3s may 6e constr�cted as gart af this devela��nent T'�e types '
Vaif's Fr•ont Door�
lg Enviranmentaf Impact Repor�t
Page B-26
September 2'7,2602 ICQECFtC.EIN CUxs'tILT7NG ENGINEERS',Ir'G
1obNo 0?-l0'7 Consulting Genterhnical Engineers
a�r walls that are possible on this site are canventional c�ncre#e retaining walls, MSE,
(mechanically stabilized earth) walls, crib walls and �►ou]der retainin� walls. We
recomm�nd that drains be consm�cted adjacent to ihe retaining walis to reduce the
possihi3ity of'developin� hydrostatic pressures behind the vvalis. T1�e drain may cansist '
of'a mantifacrured drain system and �mavel., T�e: �ravel should ha>>e a maximum size of' '
i„5 inches and have a�naximum of'3 pereent passin� t�e No. 200 sie�re, Washed concFete ,
aggre�ate u�ill be saiisfactary for the gr•ave] drainage laye�', T�e manttfactured dfazn ',
should extend from the bottorn of' the retaining wall to within 2 feet af' sub�rade '
elevation. 'The water can be drained by a perfarated pipe with coIlection af�the water at
the b�ttom of'the wall leading to a positit�e �avity outiet. A tygical detail far a retaining
wa�l drain is presented in the T�ypical Retainin� Wall Drain Detail, �i�.. 2�.
SURFACE DRATNAGE
We recommend the fojlowin� precautians be observeci during construction and
maintained at all tirnes a�ter the f'acilities are compieted.
l . Wetting or dryi�g of' the open foundation excavations shou�d be
minimized during constn�ction,
2. Al] surface water should be directed away fram the top and sides of' the _
excavations during construction.
;. The �aund surface surraundin� the ex#erior of�the buildings and additions
shou]d be sloped to drain away in al! directions. V+Te recammend a slope
of at least l� inches in the first 10 feet
Vail's Fr'ont Door
20 Envir�onmental Impact Repart
Page B-27
Septernber 2'7,2003 KOEC'HLEfN C'011!S UL.7'ING ENGIA'EER.S. 1IYG.
3obNo. O�-307 C'n,rsulrrag Georechr+ical E,rgiatrrs
4. Backfill, especially around f'oundatian waiis, must �e placed and
com�acted as recomrnended in the C�MPACT�,D FILL section af this
report.
5. Surf'ace drainage should be designe.d by a Pro#'essronal Civil E.n�ineer..
CaMPAC?�ED F'ILL.
�'il� may consist of'the natural �andy �ravel, silty sand v�rith �ravel, existing on-
site san�y �ravel fill free of deleterious materiai, or approved imported fili. Deieterious
material includes; buildin�materials, trash, topsoil, and or�anics T�►e imported fiil may
consisE of non-expansive silty ar clayey sands or grave�s with up ta 1 S peF�cent passing the
No, 20Q sieve and a m�imum plasticiry index of' 10 No gravel or cc+bbles lar�er than 6
inches s�ouid he placed in �ill areas. �'ill areas s�ould be stri�ped o# ai� ve�etation and
loose soils, and then scarified, mozsture treated, and compacted. Fill shauid be p�aced in
thin lnose li�s; rnoisture treated, and comPacted as shown in the fallowin� table. The
recorr►mended co�npaction varies �or the given use af the fill, as indicated in the follawing
tabie.
�� Yail's Front Door'
Envir�onme�tal impact Re�ort
Page B-Z$ :
September 27,2Q02 X OECffLE1N C'O,Y.S UL'T7NG'�"NGlNEERS, INC;
3obNo.b2-107 Cn�sulrirrg Gealechniru! �ng+erarrs
Recommended Cc�rnpaction
Pereenta�e of the Percenta�e of t�e Percentage af the
Use of F�ill 5tandard Proctor Mc�dif�ed Proctar Optimum ',
Maximurr�Dry Maa:imUrri Dry Moisture Gontent ',
Density Density {ASTM D-698 '
(AS�'M D-69�) {ASTM D-1�5'7) �rD-�557}'
Below Smacture Foundatians 98 95 -2 to +2 '
Below Slabs-On-Grade 9a 90 -2 to +?
Utility Trench Backfili 95 90 -2 ta +2 '
Backfill {Non-Str�ctriral} 90 9Q -2 tb+? '
Notes: '
l . For clay soils the moisture content should be 0 to +2 per�cent of the optitnum mozstur'e content.
For �ranular soils the moisture content should be—2 to +2 of'the optimum moisture cont�nt. ',
We recnmFnend that a representative o#'aur office observe and test the p�acement
and campaction of structural fli. F'i1i placed below fbundatians and siabs-an-�-ade is
considered stnactural 1t has heen our experience that without en�ineerin� quality contro�,
pc�or construction technic�ues can occur which resu3t in �oor• fo�andation and slab-an-b*rade
�erformance.
LIMIT:A7'lON5
Alihnu�h t�e exploratory borin�s ��ere ]ocated to obtain a reasor�ably accurate
detern�ination of foundation condit�ons, �ariations in the subsurface conditions ar� always
gossible An}f variations t�at exist �eneath the site generally become evi�er�t ciurin� -
excavation for the removai of existin� structures and excavation for the new structures. A
re�resentative frorn our office s3�o�1� observe the completed excavations to canfirm that
Vail's Fr�ont Door• '
�� E�tvi��onrr�ental Impact Repae�t
Page B-Z9
5eptc�ber 27,200� KOECHL,EII�'C0�'►'SG1.TI�'G E.��GI.'��EERS,IA'�
3obl�o. 02-107 Consulring Geotechnico! En�ineers
the soi15 are as indicated by the exploratory borings and to �rerify our foundat�an and s3ab-
on-srade recoir�nendations. T`he placement and compactian of fill, as well as insta�lation '
of foundations, sho�d al5o �ie absen�ec� and!or tested.. �T�ie desi�n criter�a and subsurface '
data presente� in this report are valid for � �ears from the date of'this report.
If we can be of further assista.nce in discussz�� the contents of�this report or in
an�lyses of'the praposed p;o,ject frorn a soils and foundatian vie�•point, please call
KOECHLE� CONSlii.�ING E.NGmTE�'RS, INC.
<«<un mrur��
ao�•R��!sr'�-,,
. � �� ••�' -�
.., .�,-�
r
� � �:°=
' 33822 ' -
• • -
-�o: / ���
�0: ���r°Z::�:� '
4 et,�{,•� �' \`�•
'��. � •.....••E�v.�
,4''�4 S;�N�I�l u;,t ti���``�`````
5catt B Myers, P.E ',
Senior E,naineer '
Revie��ed by: '
.� � -� 1��
� . �, h. . ...�...
: �
,� �.�_ _�-,t--
Wzltiam H.. Koechlein. P.�.
President
(4 cogies sent}
VaiPs Fr�ont Door�
�� Environrnental Impact Report
_.�
Page S-.3Q '
KDECiIl..Ei�J CDNSUL'�ING ENGiN�ERS,INC..
Consulting Geotechr�icai Engineers
.� . ._ . . _ ���:�� . � �. -_ ... , . .. . = . . _ . . -,
r°'�gF'.Fcr 4r , ' ,.. _�,._ , . . - . _
-'" .. ��o r�3re � .
, : ��,�� „ _ � . -. �"�� . • .
, _ i:,:Y���A � . ' _ _ ,� , _ ,_ . _ , ' :�
�.�
' ��� �`. ::� �� �.•1. ' . ' -l.
.
� •
, :.,�� �.���`-,. ,. ;: - .
, �.�._ '+-- � �_ �7e � .. � '
6e�v�r�cn Rt1 . -• �l�,'�x[y ,;7 �l�
_ ' ��,'� �- �� � .�_...._..� f- �'�'
�-� v, .. .., . , . _,S Fr� a�e
Ss- ty� � �:mr --- --•
��� - ' - - r' . +�i � m .E���'a''� s ` ,��' •' . "
• � ' • �fG�' . i `, � �.� , . . ' .�--
.. . ;. .. :y�c�,.k�e�d : �'" . _ 4. �s +_ t;- ;l " ,':, ,'�Y�
�._ ,� -�.= _ ��
. . ,. � . � :i� r,_ , _ �-�s� -;
. ' � _ � '!_".?R;.. :-.} .i.:.�:...n': k�Jw-r •4- `�� �i. .y t �
i� .. ' . , . .1� �,a,C � �iJ'
F . ., , �:�: . , � ,_ , . 'i
. :,- �� � ' , r
r 's
i_ . _. ' �l �� ' � 1_, :
. � . 3L
. � �" 1_ � S , � .
� � �' S ! �' �'�',L� �.�'v�i i.'�'>.xh,;v``x'.y ` - k-:
i ' � _ _ •, ,l . � '1 . h�..i i...,'�.,..�^.....-��"".1..�Ty���i.�7� ! l _ T4 +_` .. .
: . . . J�. - �.4'MO:' '�•L fl ` _ _ 'i+'
i .. " . _ .,i . a _-:4. ir � R� `a „t �. . �4..,:
, . ��'�t'- $�,.> -'�'•` . � -
f • . �_'- ��. . °:;::
a . : :. ._..
:� , . . .: .'
• . . , . r :.1 . t „
_ . � . .., ' � ���`,� � . '� � � � � ^ . '!s
. �. � _. � . � �, , .. P' .. . .. -. - ` . - � - - ._ . ..
SITE
NOT TO SCALE ���
VICINITY MAP '
Vail's Front Door '
'B ��" °2'��� Envir�onrnental �mpact Repor�t '
Page B-31 '
�CD�CHLc4h1 CONSLlLTl1�G EidC�N�ERS,EI
Consulting Geotechnicat Engine
_ . - _. � � : _ - _ =.:-,
� . .. ' . _ .- - .. r _' � �.'`•�. _ .
,. '. . " . ..�' '. . : � .- .c� -��-? - . — � ' _ ._ ' - - • �, �,.
�� _. , .. ' . -' , � . . .. ., � ._ � - � - . �
,. , � .. . _ : ,... � ' - � --- _ �
_ _ _ Y x� . _ -- - ..� - _ �;-"_ r , ��'.,tJ .�" _
�. ::.. � ,
-_ . _ . :fA. __ ., � ,��.� �-� -_
- : _
� . , , ... , ,-..� __ ; f��:��- , - -
- � .. "' _ . +�..--_ - _ �_E -
, _ .� , ' ' ,� . _ ` - ' , _ . 1.�.-�_ �. `k .' '
- ?°- ��'~ .__ '�' `c- _,- � - __�,._ _ .. _ .__..,.- ---._ ...__ .- - /�' QV`�. !`"'r�`` -.. -
- - - APPR4XIM�.'�E AREA
_ _ . _.. - _�_-- - -- - / PR{3POSEf) LODGE A`f� �IL '- � _ _
- .• -- -- � ADE3[-CIOiVS :� { �, .y-'�-- .
.; �, ._
. _ •-. ..
� - ... .. � -
� , . ., _, , . . _ ._ TM
.. _ - . ' '' :-. ,.. ° . R - � ��y."'�+�� _}vj: "
. -_ . . .. _ _ �-„" �r, ,� �i:t , .
. ' , ' . _
•r _
- "`' LODGE A'T VAiL GORfDONiINIL3 5 ' -. ' ' _ `" _ ,'
: .. r; , ; � .��� , _,�,. _
r '�'� -
V-� �, .fi-. ,_ __
_ � .. _., - -� _ _ �_ -- ! �^��.�� [-�� -' -� .
..- ` t.1 _ — ...... _ � _ .....` �... __. — � _ � _ . ...� , �. � � — � � .
.. _ . ' T '-: -;i r� �"+.-..�—_ �'H' „ _.� _ .. .
...., .. __ __'_ .' �+ "--t.4 „�� Ir- - i �'—�^ �
__ --_.- �7 qS � � �-' �_ ---_-- _..___. :..��- ��r ��-�`.s � - `� ����.— t�=`. -- - ,
- - =.�"p qL r�" ' ; ; � �' , -.�-- --' - _�--�r. s _ . .
.. ::� ��. '�o,� � �:y � Tk�-3(s8-34sj � - -- - _ . ` ; - -�' -- � ��'.�i� - — —
_ _ _ _ �'Fl 7�00-49 � ' �TH-8�00-�9� . * T�-9�flU�Q9'�''. ` ' t�'=� ,�=.�"_' .��. "��`_�. —
' y- - '_,�. �
.. . -„- . � -� l_. � �--� _ _ -
_ - .: . . n — - - - -,�.,..�. .
- _, --i_� _`' �-���w:� :., '�_.� � ...��' =1,--�� '�'�^'�-�...�-iF�.e'. � -��" - 'r-�_�"'�.z.'� .� � �.
. .. �_ .
- ,. `�"H �9-�U0-�97�; . '-`'� � � __ -.• � - _ _ Tl-1-'� (98-348)t�r�=:�;y"'" 3 r- '"��,..:� : A "�f...:�-�°°'�'� '_.'i",.-� �- .
_ � 1u � , . - � ` �Y�' ; �. .r+^'.ry_ S : f T.r -"-^'� .� ,�� - �1� ,
- �;�• � y T-�i-2(98- g� ,;,` �- ..�., -t fx �_��; ��.-- --�ti---- , —`�' s-�:�-�-- �
_° - �;=- --• -- 34 ���.s �_� ': �:f��r�' # � , �� . ,-,, � ..
._ _ ,.
- , . .
.. . ^ .: � ,�---•�-.� i�
. . .... .
_ -. - - �. - : � - 2
'�H-18 (UO-097f- " • ' �� • _.. ��� - • - _ ,
� _� :��� r -�- ,a TEi-20(� 10.7)',.
...__._r•...-,. � ,.- ��... J��_ _-=_:�..— , .�
, ._-. _. '' .
.�.._-. �_; _ . .�-•� ..� .a
,_. �._ _ _ ., �:..- � _ , il�.y-`�-� +i^'~ � l � � : .• ��' � + .
-�: , . '�^ '' . ..,9: , • `.--. '
� ti
� ;::" T}i-�7 00-�97 ' ': ..� !�`�[ y —ry�r -- � i _fi-i 0. 40-09 - .
._._
. : .
_ � 3 40 f . _ .� 'f'}q•-2(02 07} _
. _ . _ _ _ _ _
_W . _ , .. „- _ . _ . ` '
__ ._ �T � {
__�.__ � �. „ •,, .-� - {=.�='� _ • •.�:��.. ..�' _
Fi-4•(98 34&y,
. . . • ]
•.�r,-�.
_ . . . . j _
., -"- �•�._. ..._. '� . .... .• �..'�A ;" ' . �'r: _ _ _. ..T M _�� ���.
1 C7.��4� J 1� - ���_.. ' ! �.+ � j �
t.�±-. ', �'. ' ` ' .. . .. : -^�.—.�- ' _ T7� . � _ .�.
•�4".� �=S C F M� •��.,� } �
�� .z 7 �
-... �. ,.; '. ..., �� � . - 1 fl'"�2���� s
'_' _' � — . .,.� ,
' -'..: " ' _ ' ' — ,
.
k _
_ �.. -. � . , .., '—L��..^,r. - . ��
_- - ... �� '. � TF# 1��.{10=Q97jY � =1�3.{�0�•-09'7} " -�� _3 0„-097 `.� f� - , � '
i� � �J z=�� .�;x_:�_ �-:--.. • 'f 99-� � :°� ., ,a'
_
...
�. - --��.:�
_. - .,. ._
: . : �
�,.�-�." �
" ' ' ' � - �IidC�
� _. _
.�.- L
� .� _ . ,� �-71i-�S (04�'Q97j �� ''LLQQ ' ' '
`�_
_.. •_ � . ��^-�'' - '•- � � . _:r�
-• _�-----�.. . _ . - ,e� . . .�.
- ,-__-.=...-,.'�-,._ - s � + -- . . . -�`�-
� G��]]�_
� _'_ 'J � _„-._.�v .T� � ��_^ r. _ __._+-.v 1..M1``�'� '�. ',�•w �ti_ .'r..�G�F°'luci ',,
-� ' ��. .�:z'�'ry\ -' ' _
_ � . � �
, , "�- � .�._.__ �FC R
.
_ ._. _=�.. .. ; .. __:�- �.. __ �.,;� �..�.�.-- = ;�• - . , .
. _
___:,�, . . ., . -, t. ' _ _ .�� _ .J
. �• ���a �
� .
. _ w. �, . __ ._ ,-.,, �T_.,� �:y;: _ �� ,,-.....
�
_. �. - . _ - ° APPRQXIf41iATE AF2EA�F
�-�,,. •__. _...� �..�.�. .. .. -_. __ _ -
.. � � ��' �.
_. � -
__ ..._ -, - --- - � - - - �
, _ �
._ .:._._. _ . �F __ ... _ _ -.._ - .� • IT�GAE]DITIQ�S
._._. _._. < . ... . - - .
�:
A` �
_� �.q� � ,�, ��_�
- � .. .__- _..-. ... .. . �-.�. - - - - POS�b BUfLD
_ _ . _ __. � - _ _ . � -_ -� -- :� . w TH-27 {U2-�l 07). �4 �. PFt
-._ - _ •. 'i'� -_
-- --- ,.-
�- _ '
- ' ' - .: � ...'., � ' ,4 —•' . ~ ' 1, � - .
' ..;. � ' .' : , y �— '. � r.. - -�� , ? , i . , .
"�'�'- '��"'+.. .� .
... Y . . . .. ... ` r� r :
-.t....... . .�3�-•' . �� ���- �.� ^ w-`=, �'�"� -. ��-- ~'v� •`�. ,. �` �,� �°_'"s' !} ,.
- �-. � �� �,�.- ti '
. _ _ � . ... �� _ .�-.L,,� • 4 �...,,,. 'y ,. r{ � ..� i , � �--�-
' �'.E'�-G�9gi'3�8� "� . _-�...._ r •.=�..v �, _ _ _ ' .,. '��..1 � `?� _ q1 • _
-, • � �; �, - -.
� �, �� - �� '' _ �.�
. '�-,,�- �----`. �
_ , � �r- -3� ' } 4 ��� ``� :5Y'_ fJ
�-� � � ��` .�` ,.. i � r�
� ° ��,Y � t � ��j�~..� •�� ti'`;�ti�'r _ ` yr ��; . '�,5
.'�. �` —s"�. �� �� _ i '-s'�"�V ti`ti �+,�`-. \��.\ � � _ '~I �� ' ti ; _ 1 � , -�
. ?
�- . .�;�. _ .
,y
�- - ' ��� �-� �' f � -
� - ? ; �\ t . � 1
.l %�
.
-,. , -� � �•.A, �' Vr^. �
`__i"N 5(98-�48] � _ - i� � -�•' : •� �,
,
,� � _ � �. 'ri
_ .-:�__:__�..��.�_�,_ � _ . � � ,
. .`
,_y, . _ �� � �' :
�
,�� :. . . .r .
�• - �- - • '��
.\`
.
,.�� _ � ''�- .._ �+.."1.,_ _ � ,♦ � b 'y� r` r
. �. . �.ti � � �..
_ .__ . ., -� � - • TE AR O f2 A
.� . .
, w ;
• ,
. ,
, -
: _ _. . _,, .APP.RDX�Mi4 �A ���. 4l OP _ _ , , �..,:
_r r, `! � .:! �
. _ r,4P PDXlfili 'f�A<<.EA �. S�GEER . '� ;
_� _ — � -.P�20PQ�EqR�SIU�NGES A�iQ ��'SE32VIC-E5 BUIL'D1NG�� � ' �� - �� �r. ';
. ti..� r -` �. ..I� ,�-`r
� 51:1'•CLtI$;:`���\.�-. �� ��-i.„ ' -- 't , } ' :fr
' �'. - ��'1 `` . ..,. , }..`y e '�'`_``�_� _��`. t� l. � ' ry; i i=
''\.�� .� �`` ,�.' i .��. �. � j 0 1, s
���� �I 1 • � _ _} : : � �i a �r'=
� � .,�'�.. ; - i ._ -. ; ,
�., `L` _.,\,;ti'� ..� ji,.• .._: ���, :� � ';`;
` `�``� '� , I. �� ..'.,,_ � _`_ .` . �` k �" �,.�3;(021Q�Z'
• ,, '� �' ,.�� �.•„ • f �` ��v.
�;�` �:�`�-�.�i��` �'. �.t� � �.� i � � S f�:`,. �� "�.>_ ��.��` ti
. . ;� `'�. 7 _�� . �'4`� ,� #� .. -�.` ��.r+...
1� �� �� � �` � '�, � � '�_z,''ti `'` ''�
�` . . l^ �. `'` � `
. \`•~`� � = - . � ~��}` ,�F�"_ti• ,. ,
APPf�O��MAT��.QGATIO�I�-OF � 'h _ "��.~ 1..,;,,���;,` '
REl..�CAT�E�VlSTA S�HN-�{,.lF3'�' — � � -
� � • . �; '' --`�Y �i;
. . ,r� �, .--� �_ ...�; ��. , ..
, :�- _ � =a:�_ _�.�-� ,
�r� _ ,� � �1 -
- ^,�4-_.` �=Y _ _ . ,
.. ... . _ .
--, : _
� ' � �=��~ := 1` _ _ ' f —-r--� � ' ; r. - .
'�' � $Q� —�y1� _~ �t�`�- '�' .�__ _� -- , � .
.. . .. ~�`- . _ - `. _ .
LQGATIDNS Q� E�PL�RATORY B(]R�NGS � - - _ _
Vail's Fro�t Door�
�og r�a.n2-io7 �� �
Envi��onmen#al impact Repor�
Page B�-32
Ko�et����n� co�su�Yir�� �rv���;�t�5, ��u,
Cansulting Geotechnica! Engineers '
1'H-1 TH-2 TH-3 '
{98-3481 {98-348) (38-348}
APP.EL. 8172 APP.�L. 8188 APP„EL. 8170
0 �
� fl
.�� p� o.�� 501�a �
rJ Q .� �-qQ�
QOO� �..
:OR oL�
pQa ��i'�3p
:oa� o:cs
-t3 F� S�"Q
�ao� .�3:
.oQr� a-c��-, 5016
�Q Q� , . � 10
'a°a
Qp� .Q..
•m0 o:p
--� �E7 4°a
� �:
:oc �
s�a oa�
-�a .�:
.o0 5016 p-cQ 3216
15 0�. INC=4 ---s- .-� WC-11 75 -
-200=3 3 amd -200=19
�4b6 •�-
�. �a
_ �o� ��t� °
� �°�{ � b
i o 4 ' a•� 38112 2
�Qo �tS4�
Z ZQ � _ •� �0 �
_ ¢�� TI
p-p �T'1
u1 ��Q �
� �Q
•�.
b:�
��� 2�
Z�J
30 30
35 �5 -
a.a `�0
L�GS �F EXPL�RAT�RY BORlNG� vai�'s Fr�ont Doo:
�nvironmental Iinpact Rep[�r '
�os No. az-�o� Page S-.3
Cansutti�g C;eaiechn�ca� tng+neers '
�H-4 TH-5 TF1'6 '
{98�-348) {98-348} t88-3481
APP.EL. $196 APP.EL 8248 APP.EL. 8259
0
0 '
I �
� � � 1 '
i
5 :��c ' j 5 ',
�ocs � ;
�aa� , '
'c�G �
�'�aiz'
�•ata�
^�G?4
�t4��
QA r, ; 36�12
�4� 5015 '-' 10
�� W�=7
i0 a�c �:� ::4 pp�130
�A�f -200=2�
�oaG
�sC�ofl�
i3•o�
�c'�� :::
�•sb �{ 24112
��6� ��� 501$ ::uWC='E1 15
15 D-0o-z aaG pD=11 S
C�:o°s�� ��q� -20Q=43
a4 p�Q 4 O
� �Q� ���� m
� �
� 000� �o°o� '-i
Z �� 16112 2
— 20 �ac ' WC=7 3 2� Z
_ �� DD= 720
-200=43 '�.�yy
� 4 i11
Q_ �Q�b� �
� Q�u��i
C
� n��d�
�do� 50/3
� 5016
R�on Z 5
25 �f`�
ti
5014
30
30
35
35
40
4�
LQGS QF EXPLaRATORY B�F Vai]'s �ront Door :
Env�ronmental lmpact Repor�k
�o$ No. Q2-to7 Page B-34
c.ai��a.,,.u.y •.......�.... .,...._. _,.�.....__._ �'.�,
7H-7 TH-8 TH-S ''
(OQ-097) f00-�97} {DO-097} ,
APP,EL. 8l$4 APP.EL. 6176 A�P.EL, $172
0 �
� � �
�: �� �: �
�: :l �: :;
�,� ::::. �oi,2
n�o�
B�o 90172 �::::: WC=6 5
� R�a� WC=52g s`' DD= 117
�:ots� �-200 -2�0=1�
�°o
� r ::�
10
7d .�..
o:�
fl�
v:o�
�ad
�:
.�qQ
- � 15
�5 ��
o:p
L7°C1
°� v
�
� ��� �
� �
� _
z �� �a z
_ �
� �
�. k �
� �
0
�
��
��
30
30
35
3�
40
40
LOGS OF EXPLORAT�RY BORII� vai!'s Front Doo��
Envir�onrr�ental Impact Regort
,ro6 r�o. o2-ia7 Page B-35
- L:OilSi]IEITIy �cucc�.�.��•.,•.•• ����a�"."__�._
TH-14 7�i•�13 TH-12
[04-097? {OD-097? {AD-Q97}
APP„EL. 8186 APP EL 8188 APP.,EL.. $189 ,
O
0 � �:�
� ��o
�a z
,,¢� �ac;; ::,
�o� oa . i '
r�O 19!9 2 ��� '
��� @:ob� B2l1 Z :::.�40/Z 2 �
:oCi t 'CLJ �'...
5 �oQC �aot?
,,aaA` B:a�� �:::
u:aS?� ���� I
e 4;'.:
��� b�� '
•ea C � 6CS
�b�G �
��°0 341�2 � � ��� 50f12 '
�4 0
`Gia WC��� �oQ cc '
�°o� D D=121 �c�a�W G6 5 �'�#� W C=3 10 ',
10 �aQ� -200=37 °Q°•°•' .•aQ� DD=117 '
czo�? �qo •�200=16 ,
'�.Qp� �� : Q: -200=6 ,
�je�, �csv��
��°�� �o '
�°�.�� 951i 2 '
a�.
�ao� 15
15 �r�o� '
�Q e� '
�b,3a p
m
u� � -�i '
t�e� _
ts 2� ,
Z 20 � '
2 m
n~.. -�-i '
w '
� '
25
25
30 '
30 '
35
35
4D
40
L�GS aF EKPLORATORY BOR1�' vaii's Fr•ent Door '
En�ironmental Impa�t Repar't
aos �v�. 02�-�o� Page B-3Cs
�.�i�a.,.,...y ,_„__..__.... .__- - - '�.
TH-14 TH-��
TH-13 {00-097}
{04-097} (a0-Qg7}
APP,�L $190 APP..EL. 8�90 APP.E�. 8�97
�� d
o � � �
::i �
:� :; ��
:I �=
:�::., .
� � C" 29l7 2 4�112
:::::�40112 ::� �
5 h: : �: :� -Qa::�
.�:::.; ::i '���
�- � -a'°�
:�
::� �015
WC=7 10
10 pD=130 '
-20b=23 '
a�p
15 '
l5 '
0 '
m
r � '
W •-{ '
Lti = ',
!L 2Q
Z 2� Z '
_ �
o~.. � '
es.� �
� '
25
25
30
30
35
35
40
40
L�GS OF EXPLORATORY B�REl1 vail's Fr�ont Door�
Environrnental Tmpact Report
,�os �U. o2-t o7 Page B-37
� �.Ulisu�as�y v....�..�-.. . _- _
TH 18 TH�-17 TH=18
(04-Q97) [Da-Q971 t�0-Q97?
APP..��. $223 AP�.EL. 82�7 A��..��-� 8220
�
D
b ,� � �
� �""-'
::� �' ::�
..� = 5011 D
;,� :.� 25J12 ;
�� '��'
::[� 79/72 h: ::� �t3-.ae� 5
� � :...s p�
� ::� �::�.:I � ��
; �', �� ��
:.I �: :::� �
�.i; ��vo 5015 �'�
::..i WC=3 �� 3Z112
oa�39!12 � ..200=0 �' a wC=3 �0
l fl occs �-20a=9
:04�
pAS-�
:a�f
�p�
Q�.,
�°�° 50l5 15 —
15 :so�WC=2
•o�� -200=9
�� v
�Qa,
�Q�� . �
� a� �
w � _
�- 2�
Z 24 �
�
2 �
p~„ 'i
�
❑
25
2�
30
30
35
35
40
4D
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORI vaii's Fr�ont Dvor
Environme�tal Impact Repor�
.�os ►va. oz��a� Page B-38
i:onsuinng l3CLllCl..�un�.0 _.,�� -- -
T1�-19 TH-20 TH-21
(00-D971 ta�-�a�} i�2-1 D71
APP.EL 821� APP EL. 8191„9 APP.EL. $193 1 �
_�
0 °'� - '
� �
-....�
34112 �. '
�:� ,
�:::::� ''
��::i::'� ! 6I�2 -,W�185 � '
C:..:_' 3fi112 .�
r•
5 � ... Qeo� �°��1 ��204= 12 ,
y.::;'.: .m4 Z h��,��
:::t �bo� �:.�
. ��aa ,
.00 d o 4� '
�'� �Qo� -�:� '
:::::; �:Dii ,'3-4�j
�":::i
� 21/12 paoo�5Q1�2 a�4217 2
�� lQ
poo -44 �4��
7 d °a� aQG o• '
��:+p�c oo �
[3'.��� dD� �t��°a
bGi�� C7C ,
. Y�OA' OC� b'O� ..
�:0��' �QQ� i�•& .
� �aS? p ' I
(7Q, � I
�`¢eu 4fi!� CS°�
�oq 1, c�o° 50110 ��-,�� 41 I6
�� 38112 Qb�WC=�7 �°aa■ i5
15 Q�o ���a� �-200= 7 4 �
�-a
�:ot� O�� �
�40�9 �o� �
'9
�~u �C��� QoQ� �.1
L1.1 �c7oa� �:4k�S� '_
� �� da'a`� 26112 20 Z
zo 7�
�
�
a -�-I
w .
❑
2�
25
30
30
35
35
40
4a
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY B(7Rth Vaii's Fr'ont Daor� '
Environrne�tal Irnpac# Report '
�os n�o. a2 �o� Page B-34 ,
TH-22 TH-23
co2-i o�� �a2-�o�t
APP.EL $S 88.0 APP E�. 8248.0
o ,� a
;
�
�
; ,
�..
� - " zaii z • 5ats
5 WC�z �
-200=18
R�Q�o '
ap:a: a
6LS°yi3� GS] Q�
b�:� ��a
raa.ci� �!
a �
��� �aq
�
10 �?�� 5016 �a WC�z4 10 � '
��, ��a�� -zao= �5
ea4�; ��3:�
IL�?3:0 �
�°'�� A°Q '
a��` .�:�
��:b
�P� � 4�d
b4?�Q!
�a�a 5�19 4�v�
�
C3-c' 'fl� '15 �
l� �'b.�i �a�l
naae�; f3:
���
�oi .R 0
�,,, � c�, o,
p f3:a, � • F77
C?QQ p��}- 'O
l�il pESaQ�
.�.. �
Z �o� 3�112 °���40I10 2
2Q � °°�" 20 Z ,
2 '
H - � '
� m
ua ..�",�
❑
25 2� '
30 �� '
35 35 '
4�4�} 44
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BOF vail's �ront Doar�
E.n�ironmental lrnpaet Repnr't ;
�oa �ao oz��o7 Page B-�40
KO�CHLEW CDNSULTING ENGINE�R�, i�tC„
Gor�sulting Geotechnical Engineers
aEND:
� FIE.L, G�tAVEL, Sandy, Silty, Scatcered cabbies, D�y to moist.
� Loose tv mediusn �ense, Brown ta dark brown.
� GRAVEL, Sandy, Cobblss, Boulders, SiEiy. Dry to
�� moist, Dense to very dense, Light brown to b�awn.
��? '
. ASPHALT
'.'�� SAND. 5lty, Some grave� Moist, bense ta very dense, Light
.`. brown to reddish brown,
� TQPSDIt
.`�
�
-► CAVlf3G lndicates depth of caving saiis while driHing
7� REFl1SA�. lndicates practicai drill rig refusal.
�
_ WA�'ER. Indicates depth of water encouniered while drikling
SPL[T SE'ODEV DR1VE SAMPLE. The symbal 5016 indicates ihat 50
� blows of a 140 pound hammer fallinc� 30 inGhes were required to
drive a 2 0 inch O.D sampler 6 inches.
CALIFDR�€tA DRIVE SAMPL�. 'The s��mbfl� 36112 indicates that 36
� bfows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to ,
dri�e a 2.5 inch O D sampler 72 inches_ ,
� BLJ�K SAMPLE. Obta�ned from auges cuttings ',
Notes: '
1 . Explaratory bori�gs TH°1 ihru TH-6 were drilled an October 2fi, 1998 ',
borings TH-7 thru Tki-1 3 were dril�ed ors May 30 and 3'!, 2000, and ,
�arings �H-20 thru T�i� 23 were driEled on Sepiember 17, 2002.
2, Ground water was encountered in boring TN��3 at a depth of 2Q.0 feet ,
and ir� exploratory baring 7H-23 at a depth afi 17 0 feet
3 The Boring �ogs are subjeGt ta the explanatians kim+tations, and
concfusions as �ontained in this report
4. Laboratory TesF Results:
WC - indicates natural moisture (%1
bD - lncficates dry density ipc#1
..200 - indicates percent passing the No 200 sieve {%}
5 Approximate elevations far barings �`H��1 thru TH-19 are based on the
Tapagraphic Map shown on the l.ocatians of Exploratary Borings, Fig.2.
Approximate elsvations for Tl-i��2fl thru TH 23 were measured using a
Starsley Gorr�pu-�evel and are based on a known i�lei elevation
LEGEND OF EXPL�RATORY BOF Vail's Fr�ont Door�
En�ironmental Impact Report
JOB tVO. 02•l b7 Page B-41
KOECHLE�N CONSUL'TING ENG�NEERS
.rn rr . �o ^ � � � � 0
I i �
toa j i I,',.� r'�� � � � � � � ti � i ! iu�, 4 � � va
' , � i I
�a � , � z } ! � � �
, I i � zo
� I �
i �
8C3 } � i I 4 '.
� , � i ' ; ' � � � � ''�.
rn
' � � � � �
� � ; ; �
, �� ; ; � � � I 4 ' { f , .� �
� �ii : �
, ; . . ,
a e° I : 'I i I � � � � � 77
�
� t ' t � I ' �
u.� � I I � I � � � � � � ` I � irE
z
V so � ' i . �� I �� 1 7Q �
��if � � � � 7
� � , I i
� j ! i � '� ; I � � BO
, . � I i
zo I � � � � � � 4 I �
4D � I � f � I I � � I 7 1�D
} I �
fl � i �. � ; �I� 4 � � � ooi 000i
' ni
� zoo ino 10 �
DIAMETER dF PARTICLE 1N I+A11A
SiLT CIAY I
.3' GRAVEL SAH� ,
GRAVEL 4� °!o SAi+1D �' '� ',
Sample af SAI�[>and GRAVEL,Si1 '
Saurce 1'H-1 (98-i48� 5ample Na. ��, EVevlDepth _ ]4.0�cct 5iL'C 8 CLAY 33 "k tl�t3�LIMIT �
P!_ASTICI'TY INflEX
.r ..� .s,+ ., ,.� � � ` � o
� 1�� k •1R 1' � I
. t00 �"�^�;�—�S 1 �n i 3 � I I� � i � � � IU
I� i I � � } � i I ' � � 1 �
1 I 1 I 1 ]
.� 1 �T� I I �I � � � F I � I 4 '^� �
�� �� � I ` ' � I I S i � I � I l i
69 I� � ���� it , f i ! � � i
I � � j ' I i ' � I I 3D �
4 � I m
C7 Tp 1 �� ` i � 1 � i I 1 i � 40 m
(n 6p I i I � � ' � I 4 � �
a � � ; 14 � � � 4 i � � m
� � ; : , i 4� i I � } � i ��� ' � � i a
� � j � � I� � � � Z
� ao ; � i ; � �� �i� � � ; 4 � � i � � . 7o a '
� � i � '�� ',� � i , :' ! i i � i I
� � � � ; i i � ; i ! �� � 4I ' '� "° ,
zo �I � `� �`�`�j � : � i �1 � � ' � ,'
io ' ' , ` ' j l � I s I ' I I 1 soo '
�
p �� � � : � ; � j i � ; 5� I I 1 � � ao� oaa� '
t� o�
20° �� D1AM�TER dF PARTiCLE iN M1N
+� ���L SANO
SILT eLP`Y
SAND.Gravelh•.Si1 GRAVEL 2S °/a SAhtD �_,._°/` ;
Sample of °� '
Elev.lDepth 14.0 feet SILT 8 CL.AY 19 °� LIQUlfl LEMIT a,
Saurte TH-=, (�8-3481 5ample No �� --�'��' p�SnClTY lNDEX
GRADATION TEST RES� 1� TS '
Vail's Fr�ont Doar
,1ob No 03-1�7
Envir•ou�nental Impact Report
Page B-4z '
KOECHLEIN C4NSULTING ENGINEERS
�. �,�� .,�
.,o � _•� fl
,�� �
'°° � I � i i �� � � I i�� l ' l
� ,�
� � ; . ; �
� � i � 4 � '� ; � �
� , {
so � . 1 + ' ' � � '
, � i ; , � i
I � ' ' ; t � l � � rn
�o � i ` �
I : � �
I I � � i '� j � I 4 � 1 � �` —�--. <o m
! � � ' � � z
', s° i , , � 3 � � � i � � � � �
: !I ' !� � � � � m
50 , ' , i � i -�!
; � ? � � i �° Z
� �o j , ; � , i , i � m
; ; ' � , i ,I � ti � � ' � 7n °
3° , i ', � 1 � � ao ;
i � ' ; � �
zd � E � � ' I � ,
en I -� I I I I I I � � � �
o � � � � j i I ! ! 1 � � � I ! tioo
�.1 4 0 3 fl 001
�200 1W � tU � �'.,
DVAhl1�TER��PARTICL�IN MM
,3• GwavEL
sr.HO si�.r cu0.Y '
5ample oF
SAND,Gravel! ,5i1 GRAVEL 3.i; � SAND 43 '�6 ',
>curce TN-5 l9S-34B1 Sample No. Elev.Jflepth 9.4 feet SIL'T&CLAY 24 °� LfQUO L1Ml� °�
PLASTIC�Y lN�EX x
1 � �� ir� ar . r+' r.�n •i n�n : I 0
I '� Rr ;l N; 7 i �' i I S I � �i y ; ,I^ I 1 i I I I I � ` � '
S '�
' � I I t ; . I •�_ i f ' ! �I : I I I 1
I � I � � 4 � I I j
� � i I } I � i � i 2 U
� '� � i ti s � �
� � 4 �� � i I �
� !E ' ' �� � � ; � � 4 1 � �
1 m
�o • �
Z i lil � 't � �� � ! j I �a �
�
� �p i ' I j � � i i � � ;, I � �
¢ I I i � I I I j �' �3
a s i � ' } , m
� i � � � � ; � _ s -i
Z ^� I� � s 1 � i � gp a
li.l � ; I ' ' �i 1 !� - i . Z
� 44 � i+l � � y I I i a
� � I � � I I � � � � � I 7D
a ' . �
� � .
i ; � ' I I � � �E � � � ' eo
Za �i ! � � � i � � � � I � � � �
�
� � � i
so- � I I • i I I ; II ton
o � � i , � �` � � 3 1 i 1 1 � �I � I o 1 � I a o, a nos
zoo tioa �o t
DIAMETER bF PARTICLE !N N!M
.�. � GRAVEt
SAND SllT �E'n'Y '
Sample of 51E.'T,Gravelh. 5and� GRAVEL 30 •k SAHD 27 '�
Souvice TH-5 f4$-3481 5am}�le No. Elev.l�ept� 14.0 �eet SILT&CLAY 43 X L1�UlB LtNi17 '�
PL_ASTICiTY INbE7( �� '
GRADATI�N TEST RESt �� T�
����o a,-E�� Vaii's F'ront Door
Environrrtental Impact Repor�t ,
Page B-43 '
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGtNEERS
s� s�n we .co aem ..�o
40U ' i'! i � � �
I I �' � � I I � �
k � iQ
9° 1 ( i �
� �
86 �
I � � ( I I
; 4 ' ; � � �
� �o f
� ! � i i � I � I <a r�i
so , : . �
¢ I � � 'E I 4 � � i I � I I � �
d 5� 3 ! X1
izi.l I � ' I I I I I f I � 5p D
� 4� � I 4 �
a I � � ! ' � I m
70 °
3° � I , i I �
zo ' I � I � ao
s
� � i �
,o �� I l ', '� I � � , I. l !
a � i � ic�o
' o� o a, a.oai
�� �� 4� DVAMET�R DF PART�CLE IN MlJf
+3' GRAV/EL SAND S1LT CE.AY
Sample af SILT snd SAND,Gravel� GRAVEL i 5 °� 5A13D 4? °I.
5o�rce TH-6(9$-i4&) Sampfe Na EfevlDepth l9.0 feet SfLT 8 ClAY 43 % LlQi1D LIMf'1` %
PL.ASTFCITf IN�EX •�
�,f. r sm un n nM
104 1.�7"�. '�, � I w ' i I � � 0
^ II � I I j ' I I i � � � I I � I � � 1a
i �
9a-�— i 1 � i I
I �_,.,_..�._ I i I I
I
� � I � � � I 20
BO�Ii I 'I I `I i � I � � } i � I 30
i � t � � ' � � '�
� i m
z 7 A " j �l ` � i � Ilj � � '� � � � c�
z
40
v�i � I I � �`� j , ' j � z
¢ � i i i i i . � � i � --�
� � , : �
I I m
� , i i � i I i I I I I � �
U � `
a ,a � � � I � � I 3 � , j � � I � � �o °
w
� � � i ;I . � I � � � i � � I i
� ea
� � � �
io I , � i � I I ; ! I � ; I ! � too -
zao �oo ,a , 4, o.o� a.aoi
QIAMET�R QF PARTICLE EIV MM
+3" GRAUEL SAND SIl.T CLAY
Sarnpie af SAND,CrravellV. Siiri GRAVEL ?3 °� SAN� 4S %
Spurce TF3-7(O(1-{797} 5ample No. EIevlDepth 4.� feet SI�T 8 CLAY ?9 h LIQLIID LI11fE« °lo
PlJISTICITY IFlDEX °�
GRADAT��N TEST RESULTS
.�dn�,o o?-�a�
Vai�'s Fr�ont Door�
Envir�anmentaf Impact Report
�age B-4�
KOECHLEiN CONSULT�NG ENGINEERS '
k ,�
..� n� .,. . o '
,� �-; �.. ,_ � �� �i � � ► � ; ,, , 4 ,�
� i i , I 4 ; �
� ' � ' � � 4 �
� � � i
Ba t � i I � I '� � � I I � I �
l � II
i I i I � � 3 � I Il � �
79 �j : z � I f I I � j '� ; { I f � �o c�
� � � ! �
; f � �
� �° ��, � � °, � � } � � �' , � ' i � � I �
. . , 1 � � i �° �
; � j� � � � ; i j�-' � 4 1 ' 1 �° Z
� k0
,., , t rr�
� I il '� � ' � � � � '° �
_ . ii
� � Ik � ' � ' � so
xo �
7 � i ' ; � � �
�o � , j I ; i �. I I t 1 � I � a.� ao� o.00i �oo
zoo ,00 �n
p{pfy1E�TE}2 OF PARTICLE tN IuIM
S1LT CLAY
+3' I GR�4VEL ���
Gwiv�� bt r °� saNO 's '�
5ample af F'ILL,Gravel,Sand ,Si! °
3o�ree �'H-9(OD-D97) Sarnpie No. �levlDepth 4A �eet SiLS�CLAY 1 1 °ti �-l4UD LIM[T �
PLASTICITY 113D�X
•m r+� n u �M ■��n �
� �; i� n.� �n�. ~ . I
I � � �
�� �il j � i �, 1� I I I � � � i� i I � i 4 li � 10
� i� W�� I I I � i 4 � ' � ' � �
It � '� �� i I�1 � � � I � � � � i 20
eo ---�=�-1- ` . � � I
� !
�� � � � I Il � f4 � � v
�o � ' � I I � � � �
� � � � I { I I ;o n
� ' ,-� z
n 60 I � � � � .�
a � � � � �� � ' � i � m
�- 5D � � ! � • i' � --i
� � ,� j � � � � � a
w i ; . z
u�i ,� ' � ' ; � j I. i � � 70 a
� � 'I % �I 1 I i } � � � � I i j j sD
� � i � i � }
2D � � � � 1 I i I � � I �
I � '
l0 I . � , I I I � 1 � 4 j � �i � . � I I � I Q DOi i�
a � � 40 � 4 S D Ot ;
� 1°0 pfA�+1lETER OF PARTiCLE 1N MM ',
SANQ Skl�T CLAY
,�° � GRAVEk. ',
Sampie of 5AND.Gravei! . 5il � GRAVEL 24 °!o SA�1g 39 °�
Source TH-iQ f00-097) Sampke�lo �r Eiev,lDepth S.0 feef SILT�CLAY 37 % Lf�k310 LINf(T %
-- PLASTICliY 1hfD�X ��°
GRADATlQN T�ST RE�� �� T� '
sob r�o 0�-30� Vail's Fr�ont Door•
Envir•onmental Impact Re�ort
Page B-45
K4ECHLEIN CC�NSULTING ENGINEERS '
� •�n o. �.n n ■..n � � i 0 �'�..
,an zni ; i,.;:I, �� .,�i 1 i �I j � f I I � 1 I I i ,o ''
so i � � � I ' �'
�
� . � j � j � �
�
eo � I i � � i ; j � � � s � '
� � � , � �
i
� 70 � � ! I � � I I ' } � � I I I` �
n
z � I � °D m
¢ so � I � � ,! ' i � I � ! I I I ' � � I � I �—� �
0. I � < , ' ' 4
H � � � I � '
_ � � � ; � j i � n '
�., , . � , z
� 40 � ` Y I �
I i
� � ! I ; � I � � ' � } 7u °
� I � � � � � � i —
� —� so
20 � I 4 � I i � '
I � i
� E ! � j
} I4 I �
'o I i ' ' I i ! I i � � ! ! i 4 � o�� � � � a o� I o ooi ��
2�6 40[3 �� �
DiAMETER�F PAFtSICLE tN N1M
+3 GRAVEL SAMD SI�T CE.AY '
Sample of $AND and GFtAVEL, 5ilt GRAVEL 4l % SANO 43 ^°�
SourGe TH-1 1 {00-D97 Sample No _ E�e�l�eptt► 9.0 feet SIL�8 GL4Y 16 °/ Ll�llil LIMIT '�
PLA57iCITY INDEX X
nm r�n
ri•� n v,., i^., �. .. .:c • D .
SOD I� 'i �,.' I' �— �� � � . � i .' � 4 1 I ly� � � I � 10 .
� i' � ��;�� 1 1' � �' j � � ; i
� lt � ' i I � � � � ' � ' � ` — zo
eo i � � � � � } �
�
� � I ' � i �� � � � � _ 30 �
' 1
7D �-'_� i i m
c� � � I � - t � l � � I ,o �
� � I I � J��. ' � � I Z
4 � . ! � I � l I � I ! � � -�
� � � � � � � i , � �
a � m
z 50 � I , , � � � � � � �
�- � � � � ' �
w i � � � � � � � 9
z
� '4 � � 1, 141 } ; I � � 4 ; i i � I 4 m
a i , I I i � � i � ' � i � � � '���. �o �
� � . , , ' ' ' •
I • I 4 � lil ,
� � � � � � ' � I i ` � �
2n i � ; �
,� � � � � j � i , i � i � i
�
,e ! I � i i I� � � � � 1 ; �i I 1 'i f � 1 I I � � � o.00, ,00
0 p j 0 07
� t� �� 1
DtAMETER�F PARTtC�E 1N MN4
+3• Gi2AVEL SAND SILT CkAY
Sample o[ SAND,Gravellti,5if , GRAV�L 35 % SANi] 69 °!
Sour�e TH-1'_(00-Q97} Sartspie No Ekev.lDepth 9.0 feet StLT&CL.AY 6 % l.IQLfID LIMi7 'J
� Pf.AS'1"7CfTY iNDEX '!"
GRADATl�N TEST RESULTS
.�o��ao o�-to? V�ai�'s Fr�ont Door�
Environrne�tal �mpacf Repor�t
Page B-46
K4ECHLEIN CONSULT�NG ENGlNEERS
s., �N�.w. �nM3�e�. �+
n nr ..� .en .i n.n 4
'I� , � ,` il I � � I � � �
100 I ; ' I" I �
i i , I 1a
i
90 I ` ' � I ! � � �
S I t �
� � , , I
� { �, � � , I i i I � �
� � j j �. f � I' } � � I � � �
70 i � , � � I � �
Z I ' � � � � l � � � �
a �� �� � � � I 'i � ' � j � � ' i I � � � �
a � , :
4 � m
� I } ► ' ��_ i 4 I ' i ' , � z
� 40 ili � i ; � ' ; � ! � � � a
a � . i i � I ' �
ao ,
II � ! � , �
zo � � �
�
,o � � , ; � � ; � Ii � � i � � � i 1 I � � �
, ,�
� � 1 6� 0.01 0.007
20I� 100 10
DiAMEf�R OF PARTICL�1N MM
.3� GRAVEL
SA�ID 51LT GLAY
Sample of SAND,Gravell •,5i1
GRpyEL 33 °� SAN q S 5 °k
Source T'}i-1� l00-097f Sample No. �� EIev.JDapth 4_�feet SiLT&GL.AY 23 °� LIQtJD L!M!T °�
P�..AS�ncmr iHa�x �
.�, �,� .,,N �
.,� � � I � � i
. ,., ,�. ,� ,�_ ., i i
too � i �r� ! ' i� � i' 4� I ` � ;i j � � � ! ! II �o
� 1� i 'i i i I I ! ! �ii ' � � � 3
. I � i i I � �� E s I 2D
ea�--T� . � , � � � � � I
i �
1� � ' ; t I i � �
ca 70 1 ' � ' i ' �
� � , i ` 1 � .o �
� w � � �. , �f �. � � i i � � a
a i� � � ti i i I I ; ` � I } �6 �
a � � ' �
! m
w � i ; I ; ,� � i I � } � � 'R � 1 � i l e° �
z
� �� l � I ; � � ' � � � m
t � � � I I } � � � � � � I � � O
a ' I I � � i G �__:_�^ '
30 ; . ; ' � � I
j � : � ; � � I , i �
� I 1 I I � ' � � I � I I �
� � '' I � � I � S; ; , � ; I �
, , �
; � , i
,o : ', � 11
` ,
a � � i � i '€ � E �� � 11 � ' ! � I � ! ' a.i ' ,00
200 10o tia t o.nt o 4n1
pIAMETER 4F PARTICLE 1N MM
.3- GRAVEL
SAND SILT CLAY
SampEe ofi GRAV£f.and SANb,Siln GRAVEL 48 °!0 SAHEY 43 'Ie
Source T'l-i-�6 f00-097i Samp�e h10 E1ev JDepth 14.0 fee[ 5il.T�CLAY 9 /a L�QU�L1 L�MfT 'f
PLA5T1C1TY tNDEX %
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
.�o�r�o o�-�o� Vai!'sFr�ontDoor�
Environme�tal fr�pact Repor�t
Page B-47
KOECHLEI� CONSULTING ENGINEERS
,_ , n�� i
.. .,� .� �� .u� „ .,. o '
tao • � i� :�� { � I � � � � I 1 }
�' � I � t I � 1 I I �o
i `� � i � � } 4 '
so ; � j � I i I '
BO � I f � � � � � 1 4 � ; � '
' I : li i : I � F � I I i � 3p ���.
I � � � � � m
� , I
I � � ' �� � n
rn � , � � -�� �
. i!i 60 I ' � � � I I i � � � � I 46 �
Q I � ; �, ' ; � � I � I I �- �
�
a � ! � �
� i � l � ; � 1 � � , � � ! � � , �° Z
� 40 �; � ' 1 � ' i
m
i ` } � I . � � i � I �a °
a i i � � � I
� . . : } � �
' � ! � � 1 eo
zo � }
i � � gp
tio � � ' ; ; '� 'I � 4 � I 1 I o� � a o� o oa, tiao
� 20� l04 tp �
_ qWMETER OF PARTICLE l�MM
+3' GRAI/EL
sa.wo SILY ctAY
GRAV�L.Sand GRAY�L. bl `k SAND 39 �°J' I
Sample nf °.� '
Source T'H-�7{00-497) Sa�npie�lo„ �� �fe�.lDepth 8.0 feet SILT 8 GLAY °/= L1QUD LIMIT
— F'LASTlCITY iNREX � ,
.,� .,�, ..� � .,.� o '
40a I � ~�.; ' �~ 'n � ! � j I i i i I f � � ` 6
90 I ', � I • � � ' �� � � � '
� � �. j ; �� : 1 I j 3 � I I 20
.I# i � � � � � L�
BO -^- �I � Y I � I � I I I 30
� ' �
� 70 ; ! '' l � � I 3 I � � n
� I �1
Z � � }4 �� RI
u] 6p � .i � � '� I ; � � � i � �
� �
a �� jii � , i i �I �
, m
r 50 �; � , � �� y
� !� '� i ; � 4 � � � � �° �
; ,
t� �o -5—;-� ; , , I i j , � � � � i m
� i , � �n o
� 4 II � � '
� � � � t � i } I j
�i � � t � � � � so
zo ,
� i� iI � � I � �
ip I, '. . j � � I { I I i I � I�I aos o.mi
�I � � 1 i t i � � I � 4� '
2USS t00 - t0 � '',.
DIANfETER OF PAR�'1CLE IN fv41Ul
SAND SILT GLAY ',
r 3' GRAVEL '
Sampke of SAND, Gravell ,Silrv GRAVEL 4� °!4 SAND S1 °k '
Source TH-1 S (Db-D971 Sample No Elev..IQepth 9A feet 51LT&Cl..AY 9 °k L1QifID LIMIT •/
PLASTICiTl'iNpEX
GRADAT�C�N TEST RE�� �� T�
1ob lJo. b2-1 Q7
Vail's Front Door�
E�s�ir�onmental Impact Repar�t
Page B-48 ,
K�ECHLEIN CONSULTiNG E�GINEERS
. . .,, , � , o
,oa ;� �I I•`� ! .. , � �� � � I � ' �"I � I I ' ��
� • I i I � io
f � � ' 'i I I zo
So � li � , � ; i � � I , I � I
� �
I ' i � '� i ' � I � j � � �.
�0 � i �I � 4 � ( 73
� I S } 1 � �f � � � I A6 m ��.
cn BO � , � i ! I i � z
¢ �!' i �� ' r � I � I ! � —�
d � I � � E � �
50�—^—T— � ' t m
t� I� � � � � � 1� � I I I � i � D '
V 4D , ; : I Z '
i
� ' i � '� ? : ' I � � � I � i I �o �
i � !
. �-� � I �' ! � I �,.
� ', � BO
zo I } –
I � i I � e°
�o lij ; , � i ! } � � ; � � 4 . I 4 �
� � 100
o p� oo� aooti
zoo �on ' �o �
�IAehk�ER OF PARTlCL� IN MM
+3' GfiAVEL SANp StLT CLAY
ga�p��o� SAND, Gravel! ,5i! GRAVEL 36 `� SAN� SD °/
Sourte �"FI�4(6?-1071 Sam�#e No, Elev..ldepth 14.0 fee! SIL7&C�AY i4 % LIQ41D LIM1T °�
Pl..ASTIGITY INDEX '�°
n m r+M1-
F� lnr Aw �e Y10 /�0 Mn +R(! �1 � } O
_� x�l ' �� I � I' � � I I �I I• I I R( � I —
� � i
I � i 30
90 ��. ' ! I � ' I � ��.
i � � � t I � 1 ' � � 4f I � i i � � ' z� '',
ao � : � � ,
I � I f
� , .f
�4 . ; � � I I i ' � 4 I � �
� I �
Z 70 � ; ', � ! I� I i } � � I � �0 � ,
� 60 � � ` k � 1 I � i S � '
a � i ' ; I • i � � � � I � �
i
u�.t � I > I � � - � i � I � � � � � �
� �
� D
� 45 }� � i i ! � 'i I i i I � 1r1
d iz � j : � i . } � I ' I � � 70 �
so -�� '�--I--;–� � ; � � � ' � � J I I !
�� il � ' ' I � � � j ? � � � � i �
� � I �I I� ' � �� I � ' � � � ��� I
to I �I � i ; � ��--�j ! ! � � II � �
a ; 1 , ' i . � kII I � I I I I � � i onoti
200 100 t 0 5 (}1 9 4 f
I?fAM�TER DF PARTICLE IN lv1M
•9. GRAVEL SAND SlLT CLAY
5ampie af S.AND aad GRAVEL, Sil � GRAVE� 4� °!. SA�lC1 42 `k
5ource Thi-�'E (03-!07� Sample No E1e�.lDepih 4.4 feet Sl��8 CLAY 12 % �IQUIl3 LiMIT 7�
PL..A571C�'fY lAIDEX �
GRADATl�N TEST RESULTS
�o��0 0?-t�� Vail's Front Door•
Env�r•onmental im�act Repor't
Page 5-49
KOECHLEiN CONSULTiNG ENGINEERS
no ..a ex •..n � �'�..
e., . � �ve� u �� � � � � � � ' '��.
�
400 I ' i r{' I � � '�..
ly ; i yp
� � � � i j �
; � l � � �
ao ' ; { ; � ,� i I ; f � I
70 , I � � � ' } � I � j � � � � � � �
Z � � � � � � � c�
� � I I 4° m
�
� s j z
� 60 �; � ; i �; � i I41 � � ! � 11 i � � � � ` ' � �
� � : ; � � ° , � � � � � �� � � � ' � i � � ! �
� ' ' � � � ' � � �° a
� � � z
� �o � � i � , � � � a
�yl � � ! i � � � � � 76
(1_ f
� � , I � ; � I ' I I
� i � I � i
I i 80
zo � i � � �
�a � I I I I I I I l �
o �� I I � � i I� l I � 4 t :. � � i 1 I . � € 1 I � 4 ,00
� o.ti o.o, a.c+ni
Zao tioo ,o
DlAMETER OF PARTfCLE!N MM
+3" C+RAVEL
SAMD SIL� CLAY
Sampfe of GR.AVEi., Sand , Sil CRl�VEL �9 % SAND 25 "/4
Source T'H-?3 f�2_l07) Sample No.. ElevlDepth 4.0 ftet SIl�7&CLAY 16 °� LI4Ud LIAAIT .�
PLAST7CTTY IhtDEX
,h . � „ �. aw a'x. rm �+r. r+n n .vn I 6
,00 , �., ,T'.°�,' �� ; i , � i , � � 4 � , � � � j � 1 I �
! y . i : ; , j 3 f I �
�; � ! I � j � j � � i I � I ' � to
� i�� � � I � � � � � � � � 'i � I I I
BD i i � � � 20
� , I j I � i 'i � i � ' , i � i � �
70 �I � � z� , � m
z ' � I } I � I � ' ao n
Cn 60 � � f Z
�
a i ' I � � I � � �. I i I � 50 �
Z 5° � f i �; � � I I i , . j � ; I � �� I I -m-1
� � ' I j ' ! � j � D
� �
aao I I '; i � � Ij , � I ' jii i � D
4 � i � � ! ; � � I ; . �a
so �� i i� j � i � i � I � � � � � � 1— � I so
' i . ;
� i jl ' � � �
�o �,� 1 I � ! � � � � � � � i I I ! I � i � I I t � � aot� 000� �� �
zoo ioo io , a s �
pIAMETER OF PARTICLE tN MN1 �
,�' GRAVEL 5,4ND 51LT CLAY �
Sample af SAND and GRA\'�L, 5il Gi�AVEL 4? °Je SAh1D 43 °/
Source TM-?3 f0?-iQ7} Sample No � EIevlDepth 9.C} feel SfLT 8 GL.AY 15 % v�Ut����T °`
PLASTICt'fY ll�[�EX ��
GRADATl�N TEST RESULTS
jfle HQ o?-�07 Vail's Fr�o�t Door•
�nvironrnental Impact Repar�#
Page B-SQ
.v W f —,Cons�lting Geotec�nical Engineers
CONCRETE FOdT1NG
�r—Ji� . ,:1 ,'�.
- � �
EXISTING 1 � EXISTIN6
F1LL C�6APAC7ED GRANULAFt FiLt FIL� ,
� (SEE �EPDRT FDR
CO�PAC71at� RECO�a�ENDAT10N5) '
'I �._.�_ '�e�f i 1-1��— ��.
1 i Ll I k—���l I I=1I1= FiR�s NATURAL SQ�L
�i��L..ii�_
EbGE OF ExCnvAS�ON
{EXCAVATE AS PER ',
05HA REGULA�'IONS)
FOUNDATf�N EXCAVATION RECOMMENDATlQN
JOB NO„ Dz��147 Vail's Front Door'
Env�ronmental irnQact Report
Page B-5i
Consttlting Geotethnical Engineers
C�AYEY gACKFILL� ��
� �—–�..:_-1
_____"" "_'T – i A�ANU�AC7URE� ,
� �I �C—� I���– – WIAI.L DRA[N
�_� �pt�PACTED BACK�ILt
SELDw GR.ADE wALL
� '
EDGE OF EXCt�VATIpN '
(EXCAVATE AS PER
QSHA REGULATiOhlS) '
WATERPROOFING
�
�'1L�£R FABRIC�
GRAVEL-�.`
12��
FLASTEC SHEETING
� F�-�1 2� MIH,
PERFORATEI} P�PE�
�10TE5:
1 , DRAIN SHOULD BE A7 LEAST 1? INCI-iES S�LOW �OP bF FO�TING
AT 7�lE HIGHEST POtn�� AND SLOPE DOwtvWARD TO A PQS�i'1VE
GRAVi�'Y OUTLE; OR TD A SUN1P WHERE WA�ER CAN $E REMOVED 6Y
PUN1PlNG.
2, EXCAVATlONS AOJACENT TD FOOTINGS 5�10L�LD BE CUT A7 A t TO I
1 (HORIZqNTAL �0 VER7ICAL) OR FLAT�i�ER SLOPE FROM THE BOTTO[� '
OF THE FOQ�lNGS. EXCAVATiONS AD.IACE�f� �0 �ObTENGS SHOULD
�1��' BE CtJT vER71CA�L�
3. THE DRA1N S�►OULD B� LAId ON A $LOPE RANGING 8E7WEEt� 3/8 '
INCH AND 1/4 INCN DROP PER �OQ7 OF DRAIN. ;
4. GRAVEL 5PECIF�CATIONS: WASH�D 1.5 l�1CH TO N0. 4 GRAV�t ',
W1TH LESS THAN 3% PASSING TH� N0. 200 SIEVE. '
5. TH� BELpW GRApE CONCRE�fE FOUNDATION WALLS SHOULO HE
�RQTECTED �R01�A Mp1STURE 1[�I�ILTRATIO�f BY APPLYING A SPRAYED '
ON MAS71C WATERPROOF�NG �R AN EQUIVALENT PROTECTiON AA�T�tOD ',
TYP[CAL V1lALL DRA1N DETA�L
.�oa �o a2��ia7 VaiPs Front Door
Envir�onmental Irnpact Repor�t
Page B-SZ
t\Utt�l"3LCIIY LIJ��JLtL�u�v L���s���s����.�i+�«.�
Consulting Geatechnica[Engi�eers
CLAYEY $ACKFILL �� —
1 �� !=_
— —'�— -`� �tANUFACTIiREA
�I�I ��—� WAlL ORAIIrt
f CO�iPAC�ED GRAhEULA32 REFAtN1iVG WALL
-�� BACKFILL
EDGE OF EXCAVA�ION
(EXCAVATE A5 PER
QSHA RECULATtONS}
�4YA7ERPR04fING
FILT�R FAB IC
G E�
o�0
o
fi lNCH �lA1�AETER
PEAFORATED P[PE
t�OTES:
1. DRAtN SHOULD $E SLOPED DOWNWAR❑ TO A POS17[VE GRAVI7Y
OUTLE3 OR TO A SUMP WME�� WATER CAN BE REMOV�� BY
PUMPING
2. TNE DRAEH 5�ou�D BE �iD pN A SLOP� RANGtNG BETwEErv �/8
INCH AI�ED 1/4 INCI-i pRpP PER FODT OF' DRAlN.
3. GRAV�L SPEC�FECAT10H5: wAS�iED 1.5 WCH TO NO. 4 GRAV�L
WkTf-� 1.E5$ THAN 3� PAS5ING TH� NQ. 240 SIEVE
4. THE $E�Ow GRADE CDNCRETE FOUNpATlDN WALLS SHDU�� BE
PROTECTED FROM MO15TL�RE 1fVFlLTRA�lp�1 BY APPLYING A SPRAYEp
O�i lylASTkC WATERPRQ0�ING OR AN EQUtVALEI�T PROTEC�EON METNOD.
TYPfCAL RETAINING 1dVALL DRAtN DETAlL
JDB,.N�..43-1D7 Vail's Fr�ont Door�
E�vir�anmentaf lmpact Report
Page B-53
U
Z
[A '
�-• �•, � �`+ (� '
. � r� }. 7� y �s �] �1 � � �+ � I..
,,,� ClJ 6/] cG 1%. C!] ,� �/] �_,] `I} V'7 Z ',.
� � � � � � � � � � � Z �''�,
„a S� � 4.> �' Q � � a� 0] a� LiJ
c � c�a � j 2' eo ?+ � � m � C�
� E-�- v {j C7 `L° r¢n C7 �' C7 � V C7 Z
� z z � � (Q U � a Cz.l � �-' .
�
�
¢ .r�r� �.�n �n � c�i� � r� Q c�r� � �
� v� � � U
Z
w
�
v =
z � � �
r!� � r� o� c r+� r� o, r �O � N �
� O LZ] o� nl � tt N r*�
°� X
< z �
�
� U � �
� f-� A 4 '
..� � ? "� '
C7 .-] '
� �- '
ry l:: '
L�.
� � � � � '
�
�
� � �- a � � '
¢ r� E , .�
� � �
_
�
; �
� �
¢
� � >- f= o 00 o r— .._.. t— a
� _ � z r"1 N [V �
� � Q L'a
Z �
� a �
� � �
� ^ � �
� N o � �- _ �' in v-, ° tn r� t-
� D
z �,
w ,,,,.
�
F" Q Q o °. o 0 0 o a o a
� � � 'e� v O, �' O' Q Q oo c; � Q;
[� Q
r-. � .�
^ r- n n n
00 on o:r oa co r� n a� rn v, o.
� � � � � °' °` o a a a
� �, � � � � o o � � � � �
� o0 00 0o ao 0o C7 O O O O O �
O O� O� d+ Q� Qi � Q r' ,
4/ �� 4/ �/ 4+ ti/ �/ \/ \./ 4/ `� �
T � r� +n �o � n o, p — N `r' Q
' � � � , � — -�- --
= � �= � � � �= H � � � ° '
z
w '
� '
--,
Vai!'s Froat Door� '
En�ir•onmenta� �rnpact Repar•t
Page B-54
U
Z
A �, ?� �
� �
� �, 7�, � � � LL�
❑ .p Cl] C/� ,� � ,_] Z
= L3� LI.�
+Z cC A .�-. ' „„U�'' , �7
�.] �= C �' a� c� Z
� ,.j a � � � � �
� �" ro �� U C7 � —a `'� �
Z
� .��J C�] C� w � e[v J
� � z z ❑ o �
� c�.� r�i� ¢ � Q �
C7 �n cn U
Z
�
C7 �
o � _
z io U
�� a � N �G v1 �
� �,y] o O� O 01 �
� o ,� - -
Qz �, Y
�
�
'.�`.� U � ,�
� ❑ �.
e
� z �
� ¢
� �
�
� �
N f=1
L:. �
w 0 � C P
Q � ¢ � � �
, ...1
G... W —
. �
[J.1
v "] },
� � �.
� - z
� ° Ga
z o
� � .
� �
� � o N t+'� M 1"� v1 N �
� �
z �
w ,�
�
a. F- ,-. o a o o � o a
� v � � oo a ? c � a+
� a
� n r= � i r= �
0 0 � Q � o 0
W ' � r ; �
'� O C O v O a O 0
o --
_ .� n ao o — nt r*� �y
— � — rV c� n1 N p
� � �
F-- �- E-� f-� F- E-- E� U
Z
m
D
�
Vail's Front Door�
Environrt�ental Impae# Repvrt
Page B-SS
uxww,�aw
SROGERPF�f
�
ar�y��7A�9 W: k�
�. _ .>
�'��L.bB ?J�G ,`
9 'w�::.' PP6.. .
��
�FOF C����
��Mriannnno�eo`
uxww,�aw
SROGERPF�f
�
ar�y��7A�9 W: k�
�. _ .>
�'��L.bB ?J�G ,`
9 'w�::.' PP6.. .
��
�FOF C����
��Mriannnno�eo`
uxww,�aw
SROGERPF�f
�
ar�y��7A�9 W: k�
�. _ .>
�'��L.bB ?J�G ,`
9 'w�::.' PP6.. .
��
�FOF C����
��Mriannnno�eo`
uxww,�aw
SROGERPF�f
�
ar�y��7A�9 W: k�
�. _ .>
�'��L.bB ?J�G ,`
9 'w�::.' PP6.. .
��
�FOF C����
��Mriannnno�eo`
uxww,�aw
SROGERPF�f
�
ar�y��7A�9 W: k�
�. _ .>
�'��L.bB ?J�G ,`
9 'w�::.' PP6.. .
��
�FOF C����
��Mriannnno�eo`
uxww,�aw
SROGERPF�f
�
ar�y��7A�9 W: k�
�. _ .>
�'��L.bB ?J�G ,`
9 'w�::.' PP6.. .
��
�FOF C����
��Mriannnno�eo`
uxww,�aw
SROGERPF�f
�
ar�y��7A�9 W: k�
�. _ .>
�'��L.bB ?J�G ,`
9 'w�::.' PP6.. .
��
�FOF C����
��Mriannnno�eo`
uxww,�aw
SROGERPF�f
�
ar�y��7A�9 W: k�
�. _ .>
�'��L.bB ?J�G ,`
9 'w�::.' PP6.. .
��
�FOF C����
��Mriannnno�eo`
uxww,�aw
SROGERPF�f
�
ar�y��7A�9 W: k�
�. _ .>
�'��L.bB ?J�G ,`
9 'w�::.' PP6.. .
��
�FOF C����
��Mriannnno�eo`
NIItivNpn
SµO�ER pF)
b`�' Fq
�
#y� ��� i� ka
'P � o`J .. . .
9� iu�� t?/p-;.`
o P
rf Or C���o��
n:nwnnn°a�
uxww,�aw
SROGERPF�f
�
ar�y��7A�9 W: k�
�. _ .>
�'��L.bB ?J�G ,`
9 'w�::.' PP6.. .
��
�FOF C����
��Mriannnno�eo`
�� �
� o
N N �� �
� � o�,
� °�
��
� � Q �� ��
� o 0 0 �� mo�
� XO�
I �� O��
� �W rn
� � �� a��
� � �
� , � � m
3Kw Daton Electric �
O Heaters(provide 208V N
electrical service) (3)4'Dual Tube o N
6"Recessed i � F�uorescent Lights -�
� �
j' �rr n �
Can _ a
N
� � Q
y.� �. �
� J �
, T'f � �, Q (� �
� � cvn w o
S (m � N �o
S y-I� � 0- cn
— � L Z n
i
-
- 3Kw Daton Electric a � � �
• � H a�
Heaters rovide 208V N
�p �
-
� c� — c� o
electrical service) � � �
(B � U � � —�
� �
j � Q N w � � m
� � �' p o °° -°�
Electrical conduit �
(� 0
sizing, location and �Fi' j � m C�
Lift Electrical Panel layout to lift by Vail � � c'7 � QD p �
250A,208VAC, 3 Phase Lift Low Voltage and Poma-see p
Square D NQOD Panel Control Cabinet civil plans.
� � �
Special Event Meter, �
Disconnect and Panel-200A,
_ ' 208VAC,Single Phase.
Siemens W2040L1200 Panel
I\ Lift Meter&Disconnect- �
250A,208VAC,3 Phase �
+�
(�
O Mount Outlet at 7'-0 x (n
for Exterior Security m° O
Camera. E ..-.
o �
U L
� �
6"Recessed ~ �
� � Can �� 6"Recessed � L
Can �
S S �
J (�
I � �
(Q
`hY � (6
U
� +-� L
U
I � � �
N
� Z �
Operator Station Electrical Plan o o �
RECEI VED SCALE:%Z"= 1�_0 � a
w �
�
Z p � w
By David Rhoades at 3:45 pm, Jun 04, 2012 ' o z 4 a Q �